Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/25/1991 - RegularACTION AGENDA DISTRIBUTION Mary Hicks/Elmer Hodge Brenda Holton Lee Eddy Bob Johnson Steve McGraw Harry Nickens Dick Robers Paul Mahoney Don Myers John Chambliss John Hubbard Tim Gubala Keith Cook Tommy Fuqua John Cease Diane Hyatt Reta Busher Anne Marie Green Mary Allen O~ ROAN ~ F > ~ . p_ ~ ~ Z ~ ~~t~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ° a ~~ ~a E50; ae S~SGUICENTENN~P~ .~ Bea,uiiul Btgimm~g ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 25, 1991 ui-~we~ an ~•9~8'9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call AT 3:10 SAM ABSENT (A,RRIVED AT 3:55 P.M.) HCN ABSENT RWR ACTING CHEIIRMA]K 2. Irnocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ADDED ITEM D-4, PROPOSAL FOR A REGIONAL RESOURCE AUTHORITY FOR WATER, SEWER, LANDFILL LBE ADDED: ITEM D-5, APPROVAL OF HOLIDAY FOR JULY 5, AND i 691-S.c, RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SOLID WASTE PLAN C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of County employees and programs: a. Kenneth Hogan, named Employee of the Year by the National Animal Control Officers Association KEN HOGAN WAS PRESENT b. Beverly Waldo, named Social Worker of the Year by the Roanoke Valley Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers BEV WALDO WAS PRESENT c. Receipt of six National Association of Counties Achievement Awards RWR INTRODUCED WINNING APPLICANTS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from School Board to appropriate funds to the 1991-92 Regional Special Education Fund. A-62591-1 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT 2. Acceptance of $105,432 Grant and Appropriation to the School Board for Dropout Prevention Program. A-62591-2 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT z r 3. Request for additional appropriation of state funds to School Operating Fund for Remedial Summer School. A-62591-3 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 4. Proposal for a Regional Resource Authority for Water, Sewer and Landfill RWR MOTION THAT ROANOKE COUNTY MOVE FORWARD IN SUGGESTING TO ROANOKE CITY THAT A REGIONAL RESOURCE AUTHORITY FOR WATER, LANDFILL AND SEWAGE BE FORMED. NO VOTE BIJ MOTION TO TABLE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT 5. Approval of holiday for County employees on July 5, 1991 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT F. REQUESTS .FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G, PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7/23/91 URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.709 acres from A-1 to R-3 to 3 r construct townhouses, located in Emerald Court Subdivision, Reservoir Road, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of A. J. Everett, Lynward Tvvine and Cline Conner. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on 3 acres zoned B-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for the elderly, located on Fallowater Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of The Wilkinson Group, Inc. 3. An ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include Section 21-25-1 pertaining to standards and provision for the review of the proposed Explore Park. H. FIRST REP~DING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to authorize the purchase of the Ponderosa Park Water System LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 7/9/91 URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council 2. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 3. Transportation and Safety Commission LBE NOMINATED HORACE MCPHERSON TO FOUR-YEAR TERM J. CONSENT AGENDA 4 r ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII•L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-62591-4 BLS MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH SAM AND HCN ABSENT 1. Approval of Minutes -May 14, 1991, May 28, 1991, June 8, 1991. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board, and Ratification of the advisory member appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission. A-62591-4.a 3. Resolution authorizing the Clean Valley Council to apply for a grant on behalf of Roanoke County. R-62591-4.b 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easement in connection with the Orchards Subdivision from F & W Community Development Corporation A-62591-4.c SAM ARRIVED AT 3:55 P.M. K, REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED ABOUT EVALUATION FORMS 5 r FOR ECH AND PNIM. EACH WILL FILL OUT AND REVIEW AT 7/9 MEETING (2) ASKED ABOUT IMPROVING COMPLYING WITH ORDINANCE REQUIRING BUILDING AND HOUSE NUMBERS. ECH WILL ASK CEASE AND FUQUA TO REPORT BACK ON 7/9/91. (3) ASKED WHAT COULD BE DONE TO ASSIST JERRY GRUBB'S PROBLEMS WITH HIS LOTS THAT DON'T PERK.ECH R]~D WHAT HAD BEEN DONE AND NO CONSENSUS TO ASSIST FURTHER (4) ASKED FOR REPORT FROM STAFF ON WAYS TO CONSERVE WATER SUCH AS ENCOURAGING USE OF LOW FLOW TOILETS. (5) EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT HIGH COST OF PRINTING BUDGET BOOKS. (~ ASKED FOR RESPONSE FROM STAFF ON CRITERIA FOR RANKING CIP PROJECTS. ECH WILL RESPOND. SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: QUESTIONED SOME INFORMATION REGARDING SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR INCLUDED IN LBE'S BULLETIN TO HIS DISTRICT. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ASKED ABOUT PRIVATIZATION REPORT. ECH WILL BRING BACK EITHER FIRST OR SECOND MEETING IN JULY. (2) ASKED ABOUT PMM AND ECH EVALUATION. SAM ASKED EACH BOARD MEMBER TO FILL OUT IN ADVANCE AND DISCUSS AT 7/9/91 MEETING. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW:(1) VACO TASK FORCE MET 6/24/91 TO DISCUSS PLANS FOR VACO/VML TASK FORCE MEETING NEXT WEEK. L. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND C011~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE M. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE 6 r URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Board Contingency Fund 3. Accounts Paid -May 1991 4. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of May 31, 1991. 5. Report on Interest Earned on Tax Anticipation Note N. WORK SESSIONS 1. Solid Waste Plan PRESENTED BY GARDNER SMITH. PLAN, ORD. AND RESO WILL BE ADOPTED FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Transmission Lines for Water System CLIFF CRAIG PRESENTED OPTIONS FOR TRANSMISSION LINES AND ASKED FOR DIRECTION ON FIRST PHASE ROUTE. PMM WILL BRING BACK RESO. O. EXECiJ1'IVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A (7) to discuss legal matter concerning negotiations with an economic development prospect. BLJ MOTION AT 5:29 EVENING SESSION P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-62591-5 BLJ MOTION AT 7:03 URC WITH HCN ABSENT Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIItST READING OF ORDINANCES 691-1 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Section 2-5 to establish a schedule of fines and fees for overdue, damaged or lost public library materials RWR MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 7/9/91 URC WITH HCN ABSENT R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 691-2 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending and reenacting Section 21-3, Utility Service Tax of Chapter 21, Taxation providing for an increase in rates and expansion of services subject to this tax. 0-62591-6 7 SPOKE IN OPPOSITION 2 SPOKE IN SUPPORT BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. AND THAT STAFF BRING BACK OPTIONS TO FREEZE OR LINIIT INCREASES TO SENIOR CITIZENS ON FIXED INCOMES URC WITH HCN ABSENT 691-3 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by ` amending and reenacting Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 22, Water by providing procedures for an increase in water service rates and connection fees. 8 0-62591-7 10 CITIZENS SPOKE HCN ABSENT BUT SENT WRITTEN SUPPORT FOR RATE INCREASES & WATER PROJECT. LBE MOTION TO DEFER DECISION PENDING FURTHER STUDY BASED ON COMII~NTS BY THE CITIZENS AYES-LBE NAYS-RWR,BI-~T,SAM ABSENT-HCN SAM MOTION TO ADOPT WITH TRANSITION PROVISION INCLUDED IN ORD. AYES-RWR,BLJ,SAM NAYS-LBE ABSENT-HCN 691-4 Ordinance vacating an existing 12 foot public utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision, upon petition of Ronald B. Smith. 0-62591-8 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT URC WITH HCN ABSENT 691-5 Public Hearing to elicit public comment on the approval and application to the Regional Solid Waste Management Board for recycling implementation grant funds, and adoption of the following ordinances. a. Ordinance amending Chapter 20, "Solid Waste," of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new article III, "Recycling" by providing for certain recycling reports. 9 r 0-62591-9 BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT b. Ordinance amending Chapter 17 of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new Section 17- 21. Recycled Paper and Paper Products, providing for a preference for the purchase of recycled paper or paper products. 0-62591-10 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT c. Adoption of Resolution adopting and implementing a comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan R-62591-11 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT 691-6 An Ordinance to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R-1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the zoning into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 0-62591-12 RWR MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 691-7 An ordinance to rezone 2.35 acres from B-3 to M-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located at 4116 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling io 0-62591-13 SAM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing corrveyance of Rights-of--Way in Hollins Community Development Project to Botetourt County for acceptance by VDOT. 0-62591-14 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 12-8, Adoption of State Law of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic. 0-62591-15 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 3. Ordinance authorizing the dedication of Vinyard Park Drive to the City of Roanoke and the execution of a new agreement with the City concerning Vinyard Park Drive. 0-62591-16 RWR MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT T. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMiViUNICATIONS TWO CITIZENS SIGNED TO SPEAK ON IANDFILL BUT WERE NOT PRESENT T. ADJOURNMENT BIB MOTION AT 9:45 P.M. - iIW WITH HCN ABSENT ii O~ POANp~.F ~ ( A Z z °,~ a ~8 ~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ~ Bututi(ul8cginning C~~un~~ of ~nttnnkr i " ~ 4•g•8~9 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 25, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend G. Thomas Brown Southview United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of County employees and programs: a. Kenneth Hogan, named Employee of the Year by i fi the National Animal Control Officers Association b. Beverly Waldo, named Social Worker of the Year by the Roanoke Valley Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers c. Receipt of six National Association of Counties Achievement Awards D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from School Board to appropriate funds to the 1991-92 Regional Special Education Fund. 2. Acceptance of $105,432 Grant and Appropriation to the School Board for Dropout Prevention Program. 3. Request for additional appropriation of state funds to School Operating Fund for Remedial Summer School. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.709 acres from A-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located in Emerald Court Subdivision, Reservoir Road, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of A. J. Everett, Lyrnward Twine and Cline Conner. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on 3 acres a zoned B-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for the elderly, located on Fallawater Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of The Wilkinson Group, Inc. H. I. J. 3. An ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include Section 21-25-1 pertaining to standards and provision for the review of the proposed Explore Park. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to authorize the purchase of the Ponderosa Park Water System APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council 2. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 3. Transportation and Safety Commission CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -May 14, 1991, May 28, 1991, June 8, 1991. 3 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board, and Ratification of the advisory member appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission. 3. Resolution authorizing the Clean Valley Council to apply for a grant on behalf of Roanoke County. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easement in connection with the Orchards Subdivision from F & W Community Development Corporation K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Board Contingency Fund 3. Accounts Paid -May 1991 4. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of May 31, 1991. 5. Report on Interest Earned on Tax Anticipation Note N. WORK SESSIONS 1. Solid Waste Plan 2. Transmission Lines for Water System 4 O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION Q, PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 691-1 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Section 2-5 to establish a schedule of fines and fees for overdue, damaged or lost public library materials R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 691-2 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending and reenacting Section 21-3, Utilt~ Service Tax of Chapter 21, Taxation providing for an increase n rates and expansion of services subject to this tax. 691-3 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by ` amending and reenacting Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 22, Water by providing procedures for an increase in water service rates and connection fees. 691-4 Ordinance vacating an existing 12 foot public utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision, upon petition of Ronald B. Smith. 691-5 Public Hearing to elicit public comment on the approval and application to the Regional Solid Waste Management Board for recycling implementation grant funds, and adoption of the following ordinances. a. Ordinance amending Chapter 20, "Solid Waste;' of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new article III, "Recycling" by providing for certain recycling reports. b. Ordinance amending Chapter 17 of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new Section 17- 21. Recycled Paper and Paper Products, providing for a preference for the purchase of recycled paper or paper products. 691-6 An Ordinance to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R-1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the zoning into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 691-7 An ordinance to rezone 2.35 acres from B-3 to M-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located at 4116 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing corneyance of Rights-of-Way in Hollins Community Development Project to Botetourt County for acceptance by VDOT. 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 12-5, Adoption of State Law of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic. 6 3. Ordinance authorizing the dedication of Vinyard Park Drive to the City of Roanoke and the execution of a new agreement with the City concerning Vinyard Park Drive. T. ADJOURNMENT ACTION NO. l ITEM NUMBER '~ _ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of County staff and programs COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following employees have recently been recognized by their professional organizations: Kenneth Hogan - National Animal Control Employee of the Year Nominees for this award must have been involved in Animal Control activities for a minimum of five years, be a current participating member of the National or State Association and be nominated for a single achievement or long term exceptional performance in animal control work. Mr. Hogan received this award at the annual meeting of the National Animal Control Association. Beverly Waldo - Social Worker of the Year in the Roanoke Valley Ms. Waldo received this award from the Roanoke Valley Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers. She was recognized for the development and directorship of Youth Haven II, a group home for girls which serves as an alternate to juvenile detention facilities. National Association of Counties Achievement Awards Roanoke County was recently informed that it was the recipient of six NACO Achievement Awards. Programs submitted must satisfy criteria such as: (1) program should have been developed in response to a particular problem or concern; (2) the County must play a decisive role in the program; (3) the program should be operational long enough to evaluate the results; (4) the program must have proven tangible results; and (5) there should be an ongoing commitment to the program through staffing, funding or support. The winning programs are: C -~ Use of Automation for Collection of Taxes Applicant: Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Green Hill Equestrian Center PubliclPrivate Partnership Applicant: Stephen Carpenter, Director of Parks & Recreation Customer Service Training and Resource Committee Applicant: Ms. Katherine Claytor, Assistant Director of Human Resources Risk Management Program - Implementation and Results Applicant: Mr. Robert C. Jernigan, Risk Management Work Force - An Inmate Work Program Applicant: Mr. Michael Kavanaugh, Sheriff Automating Real Estate Assessments John D. Wiley, Director of Real Estate Assessments Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs A-62591-1 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~" ` MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the 1991-92 Regional Special Education Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS S COMMENTS : ~~~~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County School Board serves as the fiscal agent for the Roanoke Valley Regional Special Education Board. The budget for the regional board for 1990-91 was $1,945,538.00. The board-adopted budget for 1991-92 is $2,063,286.00. The Regional Program began operation during the fiscal year 1986-87 with six school divisions involved in serving two (2) handicapped populations: autistic and severe/profound handicapped. All programs were housed in Roanoke County schools. During the 1990-91 school year the following populations were added: Multihandicapped - MH Deaf/Hard of Hearing - D/HH Multihandicapped/Visually Impaired - MH/VI Regional classes are currently housed in the following school divisions: Roanoke County Roanoke City Botetourt County Franklin County Dr. Eddie L. Kolb, director of pupil personnel services for Roanoke County Schools, will be present to answer any questions related to the program. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue received from state funding and participating school divisions based on a per pupil cost will offset expenditures. C ~ '~ / STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of the Roanoke Valley Regional Special Education Board's budget for 1991- 92. ~ ~ /~~~~ Frank J. Spa s Elmer C. Hodge Supervisor of Special Education County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To Robers x cc. File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane Hyatt,: Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~ , z 2 a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON APRIL 25, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RE: APPROPRIATION OF ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL BOARD BUDGET Moved by Mrs. Pafford and duly seconded, the board approved the total budget of $2,063,286 for the Roanoke Valley Regional Board low incidence populations for 1991.-92. In reviewing the tuition costs for the various services, Director Eddie Kolb advised that the tuition charged is considerably less than a locality would have to pay for residential or local services. TEST ~ ~~ ,,~~ Clerk r~ ACTION # A-62591-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ -'~'~ MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of $105,432.00 Grant and Appropriation to the School Operating Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S BACKGROUND COMMENTS: A concentrated effort is being made throughout the United States to reduce the school dropout rate of its youth. The Virginia General Assembly has appropriated $10,361,539 to support a statewide dropout prevention program. Roanoke County was identified as a qualifying school division and was awarded $105,432. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The overall objective of Project YES is to keep potential dropouts in a regular or alternative school program until graduation or other successful completion. This will be accomplished by specific objectives: increase the daily attendance of 7-10 grade students, reduce the counseling ratio at William Byrd Middle School, provide preventive counseling and support for at-risk students, provide a vocational assessment on each at-risk student, establish two transitional programs for 10th grade students, expand the tutorial program, and expand the crisis intervention program at Roanoke County Career Center. FISCAL IMPACT: None. No county matching funds are required. Revenues would be recorded to reflect $105,432.00 from State Funding in the School Operating Fund. Related expenditures would also be recorded. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the $105,432.00 grant and appropriation of said amount to the School Oper ting Fund. ~ ;~~ Garlan J. idd, Director Elmer C. Hodge Vocational & Adult Education County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- -2- ACTION Approved (x ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Eddy Johnson Received ( ) Referred ( ) To _ McGraw Nickens Robers ~'~ VOTE No Yes Ab~nt x ._x._ _~ -- -~- ~_ cc: File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~.. ,~ ~ -2 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON JUNE 11, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF $105,432 GRANT AND APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Public School Division submitted a proposal to the Virginia Department of Education and received funding in the amount of $105,432 for Project YES- Target Grants for Dropout Prevention - for 1991-92, and WHEREAS, the overall objective of Project YES is to lower the dropout rate in Roanoke County Public Schools with efforts aimed at increasing average daily attendance, providing preventive counseling and support for identified at-risk students and providing a comprehensive vocational education assessment on each of these students, and establishing transitional programs and expanding tutorial and crisis intervention programs; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Charlsie S, Pafford and duly seconded, requests acceptance of the $105,432 grant and an appropriation of said amount to the appropriate revenue and expenditure accounts in the School Operating Fund, Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Paul G. Black, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None q r' 1 A-62591-3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~" .~ MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Additional Appropriation to the School Operating Fund for Remedial Summer School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J~~~ BACKGROUND In the past the uncertainty of state appropriations for summer remediation has caused the school board to limit the program to the most critical areas. At-risk kindergarten students going to first grade were offered the opportunity to gain more readiness skills. The next area to be identified included students in grades four, five and six who needed additional work to ensure their ability to pass the Literacy Passport Test. These programs have been in place for three years and have been effective in meeting the needs of participating students. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A May 1991 memo from the Virginia Department of Education confirmed funding at a level that would support maintaining the current program and expanding the offerings to include students in grades one, two and three who demonstrate deficiencies in reading, mathematics and language skills. One hundred ninety (19U) students in grades one, two and three have enrolled for summer classes. Additional state funding in the amount of $27,733 would be available to support the full funding of our expenses in offering the program. FISCAL IMPACT: None. No county matching funds are required. Revenues would be recorded to reflect a total budget of $55,466.00 from State Funds for Remedial Summer School in the School Operating Fund. Related expenditures would also be recorded. STAF RECOMMENDATION:- S't"off recommends an additional ap priation of 7 733 to the School Op rating Fund. ~'~ ~ Deanna W. Gordon Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Superintendent County Administrator -2- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved ( x) Motion by: Denied Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Bob L. Johnson Eddy Johnson _ McGraw Nickens Robers x x x x x cc: File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ,~ .~-3 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M .. ON JUNE 11, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION CENTER, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND FOR REMEDIAL SUMMER SCHOOL, WHEREAS, remediation in math and reading has been offered in Roanoke County's summer school program for grades K, four, five, and six in past years primarily because state funding was sufficient for only those grades, and WHEREAS, subsequent to adoption of the 1991-92 School Operating Budget, notification was received from the Virginia Department of Education that funding would be available for grades K - six, and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the number of Roanoke County students in grades one, two, and three who would qualify for the summer remediation program would increase the total enrollment by 100 percent, thus increasing the amount budgeted by 100 percent; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded, requests an additional appropriation of $27,733 to the summer school remedial education revenue and expenditure accounts in the School Operating Budget increasing the total budgeted amount to $55,466. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B, Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Paul G, Black, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~- "7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Proposal for Regional Resource Authority for Water, Landfill, and Sewage COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the June 11 Board meeting, Supervisor Robers discussed with the Board of Supervisors the possibility of proposing to Roanoke City a regional Resource Authority for water, sewer and landfill operations. Since the Resource Authority is already established for the new landfill, it could be expanded to include water and sewer, or separate authorities could be formed for each of these services. Supervisor Robers asked that this issue be placed on the June 25 agenda for further discussion and action. If the Board chooses to officially approve this suggestion, a resolution will be brought back to the Board for adoption, and letter of recommendation will be prepared for the Chairman's signature. .~ v~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers OF ROANp~ F .. ~ a' ~ Z ~ ~ ~ rtll~AMERICA CITY I I ~_~ ~ 18 ~ -,; 88 19~s 1989 SFSQUICENTENN,P~ ~ Beauntui BeQrmm~Q BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWEIA MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE VINTON MAGISIERUIL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGLSTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERUL DISTRICT TO: Elmer Hodge FROM Richard W. Robers ~,. ,~ DATE: June lo, 1991 SUBJECT: RESOURCE AUTHORITY FOR WATER, LANDFILL AND SEWAGE I would like to place the proposal for the formation of a Resource Authority for water, landfill and sewage on the agenda for the June 25th board meeting. This authority would be composed of an equal number of representatives from Roanoke City and Roanoke County. There would need to be a neutral tie-breaker who could be selected in the way that an arbitrator is selected in labor disputes. If the Board approves this proposal, it could be forwarded to Roanoke City Council for their consideration. RWR/bj h cc: Members, Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2401b-0798 • (703) 772-2004 r - 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for July 23. 1991. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.709 acres from A-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located in Emerald Court Subdivision, Reservoir Road, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of A. J. Everett, Lynward Twine and Cline Conner. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on 3 acres zoned B-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for the elderly, located on Fallowater Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of The Wilkinson Group Inc. 3. An ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include Section 21-25-1 pertaining to I- 3 2 standards and provisions for the review of the proposed Explore Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for July 23, 1991. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1-3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~. rn~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs .: • • ++r 1 \ t, ~, ; ~'~ '~,. r .y • ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~26 2~1~19 ~yJ;~ ~ ~ ~ o~' ~'L. ~~-91 N. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICA N ~~,',~,rrl1~F~ ~ ~r~l;~~s 9~~. F ~'v ~ ~`' -1 Date Rec.: Received By: Case No.: Ord. No. 1. Owner's Name: A.J. Everett, Lynward 'Itai1~~~~~~}~Conner Phone: 703/389-8131 Address: 1239 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 2. Applicant's Name: same Phone: same Address : same 3. Location of Property: Lot 8, Emerald Court Subdivision, Reservoir Road Tax Map Number(s) : Portion of 27.08-2-27 4. Magisterial District: Hollins 5. Size of Property: 1.709 acres 6. Existing Zoning: A-1 Existing Land Use: vacant 7. Proposed Zoning: R-3 Proposed Land Use: Townhouses 7 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: pFY~1..t~n(E-J/ 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes xx 10. 11. No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) _ 3.104 acres assessed $6,200 •,: current Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: assessment on portion of tract $3 414; 19 dwellings @ 1008 s.f. x $35/s.f. = 670,320 + 3,414 = $673,734. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: xx Letter of Application ~ Concept Plan xx Metes and Bounds Description ~ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~ Vicinity Map xx Application Fee xx Written Proffers ~ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 2. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Aqent: Signature Date .S =~3~9J BL 11~L AND ASSvC~ATES INC ~ ~ ~l~ ~ RE~"LE=T~'~G TOMORROW May 23, 1991 Mr. Tim Beard Roanoke County Planning Department P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Emerald Court, Phase II Rezoning JOB NUMBER: 910130104 Dear Tim, ~ -/ Enclosed please find the application package to rezone the above referenced project. The original 3.104 acre tract (Tax Map Number 27.08-2-27) has been subdivided into eight (8) lots. They are zoned A-1. Lots 1-7 will have single family or duplex homes constructed on them in accordance with the A-1 zoning requirements. On the remaining 1.709 acre Lot 8, we request a rezoning to R-3 to allow the construction of a 19 unit townhouse development. The combination of single family and duplex lots fronting the existing streets and multi-family (townhouses) accessing the interior of this tract is tailored to the mandates of the Land Use Guidelines, especially Policy D-8. This development provides a positive impact on the neighborhood with a mix of affordable housing for the established neighborhood as well as townhouses convenient to Route it and the increasing needs of the local college community. This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan of Roanoke County development framework growth initiatives for this area calling for stimulation of growth with urban development. • FtAN-dERS • ARCHf1ECi5 • ENGINEERS • SURVEYO(tS 1208 Corporate Clrcle • Roanoke, Vlrplnia 24018 • (703) 772-9580 FAX (703) 772.8050 ~ ..r ~ ~~ page 2 May 22, 1991 Ti' Beard The parcel is in the general area specifying future land use as "Development", compatible with middle-high density residential areas of 6-12 units per acre. The proposed density of the portion to be rezoned is 11.1 units per acre. The maximum density of the entire tax parcel (assuming all duplexes on Lots 1-7) is 10.6 units per acre. As shown on the accompanying Concept Plan, the proposed development will access Reservoir Road near Route 11. Emerald Lane will not be impacted. Utility easements have been platted in the earlier subdivision to provide water and sewer accessibility. Storm. water management has been addressed previously as well. In consideration for approval of this request to rezone, we proffer that permitted uses on this 1.709 acres shall be townhouses or lower density uses in accordance with 21-22-4 A (1-3). A letter of proffer from the owners is included in the application package. Should you have any questions with regard to this request, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. N ~.~T Carolyn Bolton Project Engineer Enclosures cc: Messrs. Everett, Twine and Conner ~--I May 23, 1991 Mr. Tim Beard Roanoke.County Planning Department P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Emerald Court, Phase II Rezoning JOB NUMBER: 91013-1 Dear Mr. Beard: We have requested a rezoning on a 1.709 acre portion of Tax Map Number 27.08-2-27 known as Lot 8, Emerald Court from the current A- 1 zoning to R-3, Multi-family Residential District. In consideration for approval of this request to rezone, we proffer that permitted uses on this 1.709 acres shall be townhouses or lower density uses in accordance with 21-22-4 A (1-3). Sincerely, A. J/,~ Fd/erett, Owtfer 1~ / n < Lyt~iard Twine, Owner ~~~ Cline Conner, Owner cc: Carolyn C. Bolton, Balzer and Assoc., Inc. ~ -/ i. ~;y ~ t: ! i~ ~„ ~s ~ i= ~'' ~ . ~ ~~l~ ~~l: ,• ~'li' '~~' ~i~la :,Sa . ~~Nf9Yll1 A,/N/1~> ~MQNI(Irl • Z ~ ~ e E rune td3~no~ c ° ° ~ w ~ ~ 14ino~ a~v e3w3 ~a r ~ ~ = p k ~ G~ a ~ ~' ~Z~ ~~ ~.' j,O >i x .~ 1 / ~ ~ ~ / r ~ `, ,.I ~~~,M1ea~r j/Q.C~ ~ j ~z %~ , I = A ~~ a ~_; .C- .r _ ~~ ~ ~ I I i ~ ~ti '~ ~ •'~~• j.. Ilj ,i w ~ ~~. .~ Q - s~'~• ~ , ~, .~ I~ ~, ~ ~- -~. .•- - , ~ /~ t ~ ~ a~: y __.~ ~° ~ ~:.:: .~t .,: 1 ~~i . E°: ~G <' o :'~ ~w ,yy~~y~~^~ > N <S i ` }O yO iyy~ ~y ;~ < ~f iH ti u ~:: ~o=~ t~_~ ,,- ..: [[~ wP~i. uu o .~ GAO ~iN~w ~~ ° ~7 p >yy~ ~:: ~>s g ~~i ON Yrt.YiO~ Y_ O `a .~~ ~~f~f~CM ~a ~Y~ ~~((pp D ~~ •1H ~CY O~y~y~yQ~~~`pt C~yO .,,.~ --- ~• ... q •.s ~` .... ~. ,7`0 ~„ ~~ .~ r ~ • ~~~+~ 50.1 f "r-~ ~ ~ ' ~-/ NORTH 'gab /l~o~~i /, no4e e~ \ ~ ~ :.~,~ ~ Co may, ; \ io .-, s~zk ` ~osk t~, O 6 ~ Q ~ ~ ., ,~ ~ ..., Q ~ ~ 3 i c :r X26 , ~ ~ ! o i ~ ~ ~' \~ / 3 K 28 ~,, `~, ' •d z9 d n Z~ \ '; ~~.~ ~a ~s t•, /+ a 23 ~ Rces ;' q~ ?~ 'S „~y ~ 20 ~ ~ .,M'~ I ~' ~-~ ~,,, / ~uK / ~e / / ~ookio oei~ic~ / ~ B~ .-- C01r1MUN117 SBRVICBS ~"~~ ~ Tuti.ne, and Conners ~ Nn ARVRInPl4lR1VT EmPhaed Cnuht 11 ~+ . N ~ ~ e Rec.: ~~~ ~ ~~Za~ 'ved By: ~7i~(~\ ~h~~ ~ Cas x . ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: ~n, t~A`l ~Iy~D RFC °' ~pNSTRER~~aE g ;,LD6~ ~o ,. F ~,1D ``~~, ne: (703)989-1923 Address: 'i959 Electr;.c Road, Roanoke, Virginia .24018 2. Applicant's Name: The Wilkinson Group, Inc_ Phone:~~n~)9~~-nuns Address: ,~60 Webster Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24012 3. Location of Property: Fallowater Lane Tax Map Number(s) : 77.19-1-33, 77.19-1-34 4. Magisterial District: Cave Sprine Magisterial District 5. Size of Property: 3 Acres 6. Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: Vacant 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2C Proposed Land Use: Home for the Elderly and Landscaped Grounds 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Core 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes x No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as apart of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 52,000,000.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: x Letter of Application x Concept Plan x Metes and Bounds Description x List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) x Vicinity Map x Application Fee x Written Proffers x Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 2. Signature Of Property owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: J Signature Date Mgy 1 5 ~ 1991 ROANORE COONTY APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE 1. Applicant's Name: The Wilkinson Group, Inc. C,-2 Phone: 703-977-0005 Address: 9b0 Webster Rd. Roanoke . Va . 24012 Zip 2. Property owner's name Lynn Brae Farms, Inc. Address: 3959 Elecric Rd. 24018 Phone• • 9~8~=Tg2~- Zip: 3. Location of Property: Fallowater Lane Size of property 3 acres/sq.ft. Size of proposed special exception use 3 acres/sq.ft. 4 . Tax Map # : ? ~ - ~ ° ' ~ " 3 3 Old Tax Map # 5. Zoning Classification: ~ 2,, 6. Magisterial District Location: Cave Spring Magisterial 7. Existing Land Use: vacant 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: Home for the Elderly 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Core area 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: 1.25 million Value of Land 300,000 Value of Proposed Buildings 1.7 million Value of Machinery ~ Tools ' Number to be Employed 25 1 1. Check Completed Items: x 8}" x 11" plot plan x Consultation X List of adjacent property owners X Letter of Application x Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport $40 All other Special Exception Uses 12. Date of Application: May 23, 991 1 ~ _ Anal i cant's Signature: C7 --~ ELIZABETH HOUSE and GARDENS at Tanglewood The intent of this letter is to provide an overview of our proposed assisted care project as it relates to our request for a special exception to the present zoning. ~4'e intend to develop, construct and operate a form of housing for the elderly which provides assistance with the activities of daily living to the residents of the facility. The building will be constructed and operated in accordance with all applicable regulations and standards called for in this ripe of structure. The land on which we would like to develop this facility is presently vacant. Immediately surrounding this site is office development, multi-family housing and another vacant parcel. In close proximity is other more-intense retail use, as well as a building which services the elderly through programs and activities. «'e are requesting this special exception as the normal course of business for any such facility located in the County of Roanoke. This special exception application is being applied for in conjunction with a rezoning request from a present B-2-C status to a B-2-C with different proffered conditions, namely the allowance of home for adult facilities. «'e agree to abide by all previously proffered conditions from the previous rezoning, except that proffer which restricts the land use for a Home for the Elderly. The property is located in the Core area of the County Plan for Development, which seems to indicate a more intense use than that which we propose. We believe the use of the property in this fashion will be an appropriate transitional use between the existing adjacent multi-family property and the e.~cisting office and retail located across the street. Our intent in developing this assisted care facility is to begin to address the ~•ast market in need of care but find the cost and environment of nursing homes unappealing. This facility will be a state of the art structure that is residential in appearance, yet fully equipped to serve a population in need of specific services. The building will exceed all fire and safety codes and requirements. . ~-2 PROFFER OF CONDITIONS Subject Property: Property submitted for rezoning on Fallo«~ater Lane We agree to proffer the following conditions in our petition for rezoning: 1. Any develupment on the subject property will not include the uses itemized in paragraphs 5 through 8 and paragraphs 11 and 12, inclusive, of Section 21-23-2 of the Roanoke County Code. A copy of said ordinance is attached as Exhibit A. 2. No more than 100 residential units will be built on the subject property. L~~nn Brae Farms, Inc. B~ .~~ y Owner and The Wilkinson Group, Inc. (Purchaser) By Press ent -~ 2 3 - 2 B-2 GENERAL COfti1MERCIAL DISTRICT A. Permitted uses. In the B-2 General Commercial District, any buildings to be erected or land to be used shall be ors or more of the following uses: (t) Any use permitted in the B-1 District, except residential; (2) Commercial uses serving the needs of a community such as banks, retail drug stores, food sales, wearing apparel shops, home appliance sales and services, barber and beauty shops, otiices, hotels, motets, theaters, assembly halls, coin-operated laundries and small dry cleaning and laundry estab~shments, new car dealerships (which may include service facilities and used car tots), and personal and p-ofessional services. Only merchandise intended to be sold at retail on the premises shall be stock. d. Restaurants, aN types except restaurants/on premises consumption/dancing; in all types shopp-ng centers, and all types restaurants/on premises consumption/dancing, when accessory to a hotel end motel operation, pursuant to Article II, Chapter 4 of the Roanoke County Code; (3) Public and private off-street parking lots; (4) Public and nonprofit organization uses such as churches, libraries, schools, playgrounds and parks (5) Undertaking establishments and funeral homes; (6) Public billboard parlors and poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement only after a public hearing shall have been held by the governing body on an application submitted to the body for such use. The governing body may request that the Commission subm;; a recommendation to them concerning such application. In approving any such application, the governing body may establish such special requirements and regulations for the protection of adjacent property, set the hours of operation, and make requirements as they deem necessary in the public interESt; (7) Public utilities; (8) Animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels provided they are fully enclosed without exter~r runs and yards for animals; (g~ Home for adults provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; (10) Clinic, hospital, hospital special care, and nursing home; (11) Flea markets -outside or inside a structure - provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and (12) Public dance halls, subject to the provision of Article II, Chapter 4 of this Code and upon a special exceF' on being approved by the Board of Supervisors. Exhibit A 31 (i' _ Z /, ~~ 2? A ~3 C C x ~ N ~ O d f j C T g t,c-`. :: - ~i ~\ _ ~~ I ~~~h [ ~~ ~~ _ \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~- eo ~\ E ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i `r' ~ - - `~ - ~- ' - ~i ~~ \ I ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~\ , . '• ~ ~:- i ~ /I ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 .y ~~ a ~ C < .s / / =~ o / _ i ~~1 ~ i ~ ~ / ~ ~ r ~ ~ ,\ t / / /. "\ ~ / / ~ i ~ A~,e ~/ ~~ ~ ` ~. . \ f < ~ ~'' ,- ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~ . \\ i ~ ~ '_ / ,, ~Y . \ \ ~ ~ ~Y/ /~/ r ~ ~ ~~ / b ~ \ \~~ i ,, ~7 ~ aF d' ~~ ,m IIIi ~~~~~~~~:! IIIlilllllllll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °° ~ `~ ~ {~} ~illip,IllNl~lnlllllU' %/ /. ^ r~ c r` x ~ N r~ f C `rya.. h~ \r _\ \ ~\~~\\\~~ ~ w!~ ~iij `-1I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ y J ~ M" l ( _ \ ~~ ~Yiil nrp ~ 1' ' c ' \ 1 ~~l ~ ~ ~ -..,CO a ~~ ; ~ \ ~ \~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -~~" ~ _ ~ , J ~ ~ ~ ,e~ \ ~~ ~. --~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ / 1 •• 1~~~`fl \ ` / ~ x~ ~ ~ i ~. J~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J , / i ~p1/,` \ r~ i1 ~~ \ A ~ / \ \\ ` j / /, ~ / / l~ / ,~\ / / ~. ~~ ~ ~ ,; ~ ~ f~ ~~ / /wi~~r c ~ ~ /av~tt•t d~ 'Jl~, i r ~ i'II III ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~T c >m d i~,t~ l ~ --~ ~ ~n ~ o ~z ~1'~ g ~~~~ ~~ ---i-~.- • """i. ;,~ , ~ ~! 1 • /~. 1~ 1 ~ ~~ '~ MW .1 M/r t~0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ •-y~~ o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 1 .+ ~` J t~-Ir'{ .~ j J;,`'S ; ~' ~ ~, VICINITY J~IAP ~~ t~~•. ; . at ~~ ~~ - ., ~;- •-• so • .~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ v ~p 3 , d~' ~ .., N o` ~i %' -. :• ' ~~ ~ ~ •• *• ~ . . s a2 r ~. " •~ 0 `~ ~ .• ~ ~~ '~ n . .. ' 96 - )~ ~~ /; ~ _ " ,, ~ ~' r 3J ~ iC /~Y ;~, .i '~~~~~ / O ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~. v n/ ~ n. ~ • J / ~ ~ b 2 ! Ik r ~ ~.. / ~, ~ / ~. ~~/ ~-~ ` ~ ~ • 21 ~.° 20 2 ~/ C ~ ~0) ac t 23 ~ ~ '~~ ~~ ~ ~ Eo ~. , ., O " JS ~ ' ~t Ci -~ Noire o~~ / ~ e~ o, ~. ~e' ~ ~i 30 + 20 , 301~c ~ ~ . . ~. i ' . ' •. ' .> ~, • ~~ COMMUNIIYSERVICBS The (U-i.eluwson Gncun Isic. 20 \ i~ . ~ ~f S~ r ._ ~ a ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. _ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: An ordinance to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance by the addition of Section 21-25-1, creating the Explore Park Zoning District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The River Foundation, on behalf of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority, has requested that Roanoke County initiate and proceed with the legislative steps necessary for the Explore Park to obtain its local land use approvals. This zoning process involves two steps: 1. Amend the zoning ordinance to include standards and procedures for the review of the Explore Park, and 2. Evaluate the Explore Park against these standards and procedures, and issue zoning approvals. This ordinance, if adopted, accomplishes Step 1. It proposes to establish an Explore Park District (EPD) within the text of the zoning ordinance. The proposed district regulations are similar in scope to planned unit development regulations; issues pertaining to allowable land uses, site design and access will all be negotiable as part of a future land use review and approval process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: That the Board of Supervisors approve the First Reading of this ordinance and schedule the Second Reading and public hearing for July 23, 1991. ~'-3 2 Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. ar in on Director f Plan ng and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION NUMBERED 21-25-1, EXPLORE PARK DISTRICT (EPD~ TO PROVIDE FOR A ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATED AND RESERVED SOLELY FOR ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORE PARK WHEREAS, in order for the Explore Park to obtain local land use approvals it is necessary for the Board of Supervisors to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include standards and procedures for use in evaluating this project and issuing the required zoning approvals; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 23, 1991; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended by the addition of a new section numbered 21-25-1 and entitled Explore Park District {EPD~ as follows: SEC. 21-25-1 EXPLORE PARR DISTRICT (EPD) A. Purpose The purpose of this district is to establish an area within the County that is designated and reserved solely for activities associated with the Explore Park, (hereafter referred to as the Park). These district regulations are designed to permit a wide variety of Park activities. In addition, they are designed to ensure, through adequate public review, that areas surrounding the 1 Explore Park are afforded any protections necessitated by the Park's development and operation. They are also designed to ensure that public facilities and services are planned and are adequate to ensure the safe and efficient operation of the Park with a minimum of impact on the surrounding neighborhood and the larger community. B. Applicability These regulations shall only apply to land owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA), and to any facilities, and/or operations on such land, after review and approval by the Board of Supervisors. C. Permitted Uses The VRFA shall have the authority to plan and propose all uses within the Park. However, approved uses and activities within the Park shall be restricted to those uses and activities planned and shown on the Preliminary Master Plan, reviewed and approved by the Board of Supervisors under the provisions of this ordinance. D. Relationship to Existing Development Regulations All zoning related site development regulations shall apply to the development of the park, unless such regulations are modified as a condition of the approved Preliminary Master Plan. E. Application Process a. Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff members shall confer to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process. 2 b. Any application to rezone land to the EPD designation, shall constitute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section 21-105. The written and graphic information submitted by the VRFA as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 21-105 E of this ordinance. Once the Preliminary Master Plan is approved by the Board of Supervisors, all accepted proffers shall constitute conditions pursuant to Section 21-105 E. c. To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete an rezoning application packet. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a Preliminary Master Plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information shall include: 1. A legal description of the proposed site. This may be a metes and bounds description and plat, or a tabular summary of all tax parcels proposed for rezoning. If tax parcels are used, a composite plan shall be submitted, showing the limits of the proposed district, and the location of each parcel within the district. 2. Current information on the existing zoning and land use of each parcel proposed for the district. 3. If future additions to the district are envisioned, a concept plan showing their location shall be 3 ~~ submitted. This concept plan shall show the relationship of these parcels to the proposed district, and their intended use, if known. 4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, archeological and historic resources, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, etc. A general statement of planning objectives is to be included indicating how the development and use of the site will address the management and preservation of these features. 5. A generalized land use plan. This plan shall in schematic form show the proposed location of all major land use or activity areas. For each area designated, information shall be provided in written and/or graphic form that describes the nature and character of the improvements or activities proposed. This information shall be of sufficient detail to clearly portray the intended use and design objectives. 6. For planned activity areas devoted to retail, restaurant, lodging, education, conference, or other similar types of commercial activities, information shall be provided on the maximum intensity, size or number of such activities, their generalized location and operating characteristics, 4 .~.~ - .,~ and a generalized phasing plan for their construction. 7. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural and community design guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, heights, lighting plans, treatment of outside storage areas etc.. 8. The general arrangements envisioned for the management and control of uses and activities not directly owned by VFRA shall be included. This information shall address the general nature of such uses, and the nature of any control proposed to be exercised. 9. A description of vehicular transportation and circulation objectives. This information should include information on proposals and limitations on parking areas, and public, emergency, service, and construction access. General information on the proposed construction standards for these facilities should be included. The generalized location of all existing or proposed major roads within the district should be shown, and information concerning their specifications provided. All points of connection to existing state maintained roads should be designated along 5 `~ with the intended use of each access point. Where access to existing state maintained roads is proposed to be limited, design and operational characteristics intended to limit use should be described. 10. Information on expected vehicle trip generation shall be included. Trip information shall be presented by phase of construction, and type of trip, i.e., public, employee, service, etc. 11. Planning objectives for on-site pedestrian or bicycle circulation should be included, with a generalized location for external points of connection. Generalized time frames for the construction of such facilities, if any, should be included. 12. Statements of planning objectives and conceptual designs for perimeter areas of the district. If buffer yards are proposed at specific points, the design and location of these buffer areas shall be included. Specific activities for all buffer areas shall be included. 13. Information on all proposed plans for public utilities, including their conceptual design, location, and areas to be served. If public utilities are to be provided in phases, each phase should be indicated, with an envisioned time frame 6 ~~ for its design and construction. 14. General information on employment levels within the district by phase, should be provided indicating the expected number and type of employees. 15. Information on any anticipated noise, odor, airpollution, water pollution, or other environmental impacts of the district, and a plan to address these impacts. d. The completed rezoning application and supporting Preliminary Master Plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this information and make a report of it's findings to the Board of Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to section 15.1-431 of the code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the Commission public hearing. e. The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within ninety (90) days of the receipt of the materials, unless the VRFA requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the Preliminary Master Plan for the Park. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within this period shall constitute a Commission recommendation of approval. f. If the Commission recommends denial of the Preliminary 7 -J Master Plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the Preliminary Master Plan, the Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. g. The Board of Supervisors shall review the Preliminary Master Plan, and act to approve or deny the plan within ninety days. Approval of the Preliminary Master Plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 21-105 E. of this ordinance. The plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the Final Master Plan for the park. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Zoning Administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the EPD district. F. Revisions to Final Master Plan a. Major revisions to the Final Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 21-105 E, above. Major revisions, as determined by the Zoning Administrator may include, but not be limited to changes such as: 1. The addition or substantial relocation of major new land uses or activities not envisioned or planned at the time of the review and approval of the Final Master Plan. 2. The acquisition of property by the VRFA, if such property is intended to be incorporated and used as 8 ~~~ part of the Park activities. 3. Any transportation or road alignment changes resulting in any change in the location of public access to the Park, or substantial changes in the location or number of service and employee access locations. G. Approval of Preliminary and Final Bite Development Plans a. Following the approval of the Final Master Plan, the VRFA or its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site development plans for any phase or component of the Park that involves the construction of structures, or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Department of Engineering and Inspections. b. Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans shall be substantially in accord with the Final Master Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Administrative review of these plans shall ensure compliance with the approved Final Master Plan. c. Failure of the VFRA to submit a site development plan for any part of the park within five (5) years of the approval of the Final Master Plan, shall constitute an application on the part of VRFA to rezone the EPD to the district designations in effect prior to the approval of the final master plan. 9 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 10 ~~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER f /- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Purchase Ponderosa Park Water System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' At the May 14, 1991 Board Meeting, the Board authorized staff to negotiate with the H & B Water Company to purchase the Ponderosa Park Water System. This water system is located between Merriman Road and Crystal Creek Drive. It consists of a 52 gallon per minute well, a 30,000 gallon reservoir, 4 inch and 2 inch distribution lines and serves 28 customers. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Utility Coordinator and Water Operations Supervisor met with the owners of the Ponderosa Park Water System, H & B Water Company, Inc., to negotiate a purchase price for this system. They agreed on a price of $35,000. In a letter dated May 20, 1991, the H & B Water Company, Inc. has offered to sell the water system including two parcels of real estate, well, pump house, storage tank and all connections at a price of $35,000. FISCAL IMPACT' Funds are available for the purchase of the Ponderosa Park Water System from bonds sold for the purpose of acquiring private water systems. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of an ordinance to authorize the purchase of the Ponderosa Park Water System. Additionally, Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance authorizing this purchase after a second reading on July 9, 1991. ~/ _ / SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor aig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~ / '" /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PONDEROSA PARK WATER SYSTEM WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986, the voters of Roanoke County approved at referendum the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance the costs of improving the County's public water supply; and, WHEREAS, $1,000,000 of this referendum was allocated to the purchase of selected private water systems and wells; and, WHEREAS, the Utility Director has negotiated an agreement to acquire the Ponderosa Park Water System owned by H & B Water Company; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991, and the second reading was held on July 9, 1991. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: (1) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Ponderosa Park Water System, located between Merriman Road and Crystal Creek drive, from H & B Water Company, Inc. for the sum of Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) is hereby authorized and approved. (2) That the sum of Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) is hereby appropriated from the 1988 General Obligation Bond proceeds to fund the purchase of the Ponderosa Park Water System for the purposes herein described. The full faith and credit of the County is pledged to the payment of this bond; however, the ry'- / County plans to pay this bond from the proceeds of the revenues from the County water system and Utility Enterprise Fund. (3) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~ !~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Clean Valley Council Two-year term of Vince Reynolds will expire June 30, 1991. 2. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year term of Robert L. Falls, Vinton Magisterial District will expire June 30, 1991. 3. Transportation and Safety Commission Four-year term of Harry C. Nickens, Board liaison expired. April 1, 1991. At the March 26, 1991 meeting, the Board eliminated the Board liaison position and added a citizen representative. SUBMITTED BY: ~- , Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~~ z ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers ..T"~ - y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 25, 1991, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 14, 1991, May 28, 1991, June 8, 1991. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board, and Ratification of the advisory member appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission. 3. Resolution authorizing the Clean Valley Council to apply for a grant on behalf of Roanoke County. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easement in connection with the Orchards Subdivision from F & W Community Development Corporation 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION 62591-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE- DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 25, 1991, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 14, 1991, May 28, 1991, June 8, 1991. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board, and Ratification of the advisory member appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission. 3. Resolution authorizing the Clean Valley Council to apply for a grant on behalf of Roanoke County. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easement in connection with the Orchards Subdivision from F & W Community Development Corporation 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Robers ,, NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, McGraw A COPY TESTE: `.~~~~~ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections Clifford Craig, Utility Director File `~-~ -- ~ s L .34 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 14, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1991. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:06 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Greg Reynolds, Penn r r c T _ 35Q were called to active duty to serve in the Persian Gulf or at other military bases; and WHEREAS, seven Roanoke County employees served their country with honor and distinction, both overseas and in the United States, during the DESERT SHIELD AND DESERT STORM OPERATIONS; and - WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to recognize their special contributions in helping the United States and its allies win the War. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of its citizens expresses its profound appreciation and pride to MIQIIEL VILLARINI, PAIIL MCELVEIN, AND DARYELL D. SEBTON for the sacrifices they made by serving in the United States Armed Forces during the Persian Gulf War; and FIIRTHER, the Board directs that Resolutions of Appreciation be presented to WILLIAM GRAY, ROBERT R. SMITH, JR., RICHARD ROCK, AND MARVIN L. LOYD, still serving in the military, upon their return to employment with Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ?• Proclamation declarin th week of Ma 12 - lg 1991 as National Historic Preservation Week. The proclamation was presented to Kent Chrisman, Dr. r r 1 5 2 -, Supervisors of Roanoke County that we express our sincere appreciation to the officers, members, and volunteers of the Roanoke valley Youth Soccer Club, Inc. for their tireless efforts in organizing and holding the SIBTH ANNIIAL FESTIVAL SOCCER TOIIRNAMENT and wish to each participant a warm welcome to the Roanoke Valley and much success in their athletic endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BIISINESS 1. Authorization and a ro riation of funds for the Roanoke River Interce for Phase III Project. A-51491-3 Utility Director Clifford Craig announced that the Allied Signal Project is on hold, but that the staff would like to go forward with the sanitary sewer project to provide possible future service at the Dixie Caverns landfill and development west of I-81 in the Cherokee Hills area. The bids that have been received are lower than bids received for a previous project three years ago, and staff recommended that the project be expanded to construct the river and railroad crossing portion of the sewer sub-main extension to Route 460, and a water line across the Roanoke River. The total cost of the project is $865,000. r r - 35~ 1991-92 as set out on the attached summary; and 2. That a public hearing was held on March 26, 1991, to receive comments on the Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1991-92; and 3. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of_ Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the Secondary Highway Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1991-92 by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None IN RE: ERECIITIDE SESSION At 3:50 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) to discuss potential litigation with legal counsel regarding execution of a contract. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF E$ECIITIVE SESSION R-51491-5 At 4:00 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion was ~; AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None 3. Authorization of contract with Public Safet S stems Incorporated (PSSI) to provide an integrated Computer Aided Dispatch Svstem. A-51491-6 Supervisor Johnson moved to authorize the County Administrator to execute a software contract with Public Safety Systems Inc. to provide an integrated Computer Aided Dispatch System, and that the contract not exceed $125,000. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 4. Reo~uest from owners to purchase Hivhview Water Com an oakrid a Water S stem and Ponderosa Park Water Svstem A-51491-7 Utility Director Clifford Craig reported that the owners of the privately owned water systems have requested that Roanoke County purchase and/or take over their water systems due to the owners inability to operate the systems as required by the State Health Department. The Highview Water Company is a user owned community water system serving 18 customers located off Brushy Mountain. The Oakridge Water System is owned by Roselawn Forest Inc. and serves 16 customers. Mr. Craig advised r - 35 ~ negotiate with the owners of the Oakridge Water System and that the negotiations include an outstanding debt of $40,000 owed to the County. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 5. Acce tance of Grant b the Count Librar for Humanities Lecture series. A-51491-8 Supervisor Eddy moved to accept the $1,350 grant to support a spring lecture discussion series. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 6. Reconsideration of Fralin and Waldron's re est for Vircinia Housing Development Authority Financinc. Mr. Hodge reported that Fralin and Waldron have requested reconsideration of the Board's action on April 23, 1991 disapproving VHDA financing of their proposed multi-family residential housing development. He advised that his concerns were: (1) that this is a 60 unit complex to be constructed on seven of more than 250 acres; (2) Fralin and Waldron have advised that the quality can be greater if VHDA funding is approved because they could put more funding in the project. However, this needs to be demonstrated; (3) Although some. recreational o r 36p NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECIITIVE SESSION R-51491-9 At 6:15 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to open session and adopt the certification resolution. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLIITION 51491-9 CERTIFYING EXECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, 362 IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance a ro riatin funds for the Fiscal Year 1991-92 Budget. There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 2_ Ordinance_vacatinc the eastern 3.5 foot portion of a 20 foot sanitarv sewer easement located on Lot 6, Block 2, section 11, Woodbridge subdivision recorded in Plat Book ii Pa a 145 in the Catawba Magisterial District There was no discussion. Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 3. Ordinance vacatin an existin 15 foot sanita sewer easement showin on the lot of Meadowbrook yillace, Phase IV Townhouses, recorded in Plat Book 12 Pa a 18 in the Hollins Ma isterial District. There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to '* precincts. County Attorney Paul Mahoney explained that this amendment included changes made by Governor Wilder after the ordinance was approved. There are changes to the precincts and boundaries, but no change to the people within the magisterial district. Supervisor Eddy asked for copies of a map with the new districts. Supervisor Johnson announced he would not support this action because felt the Bonsack area should be in the Vinton Magisterial District rather than the Hollins Magisterial District. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council Supervisor Robers nominated Supervisor Eddy to serve a two-year term expiring June 30, 1993 as the Board liaison. ?. Fifth Planning District Commission Supervisor McGraw nominated Supervisor Eddy to serve as a member of the Executive Committee. Supervisor Nickens nominated Charles Steve Garrett to a three-year term which will expire June 30, 1994. 3_ Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission F F - sfi6 . through 7 inclusive, as follows: 1• Approval of Minutes - March 26, 1991, April 9, 1991, April 16, 1991. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Transportation and Safety Commission. nn,~ ~~ ~~ ,,,,,,~}R~-_°'~3°I'SSer'~ ~ Tl g~'1-12C'-~~,.e.~3,eL~~b r i L r ~ ~ I~R~: 4. Acceptance of Lange Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Acceptance of Meadow Road and Lakeland Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Queens Court, Sections 1 and 2 7. Resolution requesting Final Approval of Reservoir Road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 3 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None RESOLIITION 51491-10.b REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LANGE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the 368 - Ma V 1 d~ 1 g g,l MEADOA ROAD AND LARELAND INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Green Meadow Road approximately 0.13 miles from the intersection of Farmington Drive to the new cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.02 miles, and Lakeland Drive approximately 0.17 miles from the intersection of Farmington Drive to the new cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.10 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Windemere Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 169, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 1, 1988 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Green Meadow Road and Lakeland Drive which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways r r 370 - Magi 4,.-;~; 648) and shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby, confirmed as a public road within the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, upon official final approval of said improved road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Edd~• (1) Asked about the County Code Books. Mr. Mahoney advised that the books have been received and asked direction from the Board on setting a fee to charge citizens who wish to purchase them. There was board consensus that he set the fee based on the cost of the books. (2) Asked about a letter to Congressman Olin in support of increased payments in lieu of taxes. Mr. Hodge will investigate and send a letter if one has not been sent. (3) Asked about the Memorial Day parade. (4) Invited the board members to his home on May 25 to meet his son who has returned from the Persian Gulf war. (5) Asked whether the Board should be involved in the new management structure and organizational changes. There was board consensus that Mr. Hodge has the authority to make the changes. Supervisor Nickens: (1) Asked the County Attorney to investigate the legality of hiring a private firm to collect ,, F . I the Development Review Process. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 7:15 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. May 28, 1991 37 3 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 28, 1991 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1991. IN ~: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERB PRESENT: Chainaan Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens (Arrived at 3:15 p.m.), Supervisors-Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson (Arrived at 3:25 p.m.), Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT= None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; '~ S7~ May 28, 1991 RE80LIITION 52891-1 OF APPRECIATION TO ORGANIZATIONB FOR VOLIINTARY PARTICIPATION IN THE CROWELL GAP ROAD CLEAN-IIP PROJECT 1991 WHEREAS, the management of solid waste is one of the priority issues facing local government; and WHEREAS, roadside dumping of garbage continues to be a problem for the County of Roanoke and adjacent municipalities; and WHEREAS, cleaning up of our environment is a critical concern for all citizens, and the removal of trash from County road sides and illegal dumps makes a substantial contribution to this effort; and WHEREAS, an illegal trash dump on Crowell Gap Road along the Roanoke County/Franklin County line has existed for more than ten years and has been one of the largest dumps in the County; and WHEREAS, the clean-up by volunteers of the trash dump on Crowell Gap Road over a three-day period resulted in the disposal of more than 33 tons of trash at an estimated cost savings of $100,000 in personnel, equipment and supplies. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that we, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby recognize the following volunteers and their organizations: John Lester, Franklin county Administration; Bflly Kingery, Carter Maohinery; Richard Dooley, cycle systems; Gayle simmers, James River Equipment; Chris Greene, Pisaa Hut; J. W. Roon, Kroger; Bob Hansel, Mountain Valley Grocery; Ray Espy, Allied Satety; George David, Jr., Mika Fraley, Mize Hines, Ricky Perkins, Joseph Chadaell, Tom Partridge, Branch Highxays, May 28, 1991 377 Mutual Assistance Agreement with the Town of Vinton is necessary so that the arrest powers and law enforcement capabilities of police officers will be recognized in each locality and in cases of emergency situations. The agreement was developed by Chief Cease and Chief Foutz of the Vinton Police Department and will be revised annually and reviewed periodically throughout the year. The agreement has been reviewed by the County Attorney. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the agreement. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson ?. Acceptance of Grant and appropriation to the School Federal Programs Fund for Job Traininc Partnershi Act ~JTPA) Summer Youth Program. A-52891-3 Mr. Willie Waker, Principal of Roanoke County Career Center, requested the acceptance of a $97,530.40 grant from the Fifth District Planning Employment and Training Consortium's Private Industry Council and Policy Board for the JTPA Summer Youth Program for the second consecutive year. The program will be housed at the Roanoke County Career Center and no matching funds are required. Supervisor Robers moved to accept the grant and appropriate the funds to the School Board Federal Programs Fund. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: ~r May 28, 1991 3~~ motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the project list to be sent to VDOT without any funding provision. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw None 4• AD~roval of contracts for em~loyee health and dental insurance. A-52891-5 Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources, recommended approval of contracts with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia for employee health insurance and Delta Dental Plan for employee dental insurance. In response to Supervisor Eddy~s questions, Mr. Cook advised that competitive bids were not solicited this year. Under State requirements, contracts for professional services are allowed to be bid every three years. He explained that the rates are within the area of medical inflation which are rising about 22~ to 25~ per year and the committee felt that bidding the contract would not result in better rates. Supervisor Eddy expressed concern that the proposal for Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia contained a 23.9$ increase for County employees and 18.3% for School Board employees, and the Delta Dental Plan of Virginia contained a 25$ increase for all employees. Mr. Cook May 28, 1991 381 making the first installment of $200,000 of a capital grant a p yment in connection with the renewal of its cable television franchise. The three Roanoke Valley governments need to accept and determine how the funds will be handled. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about the hidden cost of the grant such as the costs for additional personnel to run the program. Supervisor Eddy moved to receive the funds jointly as a capital grant payment, and payment of expenditures to be subject to authorization from the three localities on the recommendations of the CATV Committee. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Nickens. IN ~~ RBQIIESTB FOW WORK 8E88ION8 Mr. Hodge advised that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission had requested a work session for June 11, 1991, at 5:30 p.m. to consider use of the Ogden Senior Citizens facility and to update their activities for the year. ZN REs REQIIEBT FOR PUBLIC HE718INa AND FI88T READING FOB RESONINa ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA 1• An ordinance to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R- 1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the.zoninq into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, r~ May 28, 1991 383 the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1991-92; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on April 23, 1991, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 14, 1991, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1991, and ending June 30, 1992, for the functions and purposes indicated: 46VBNUBS: Gig@RAL FU'~D DZcT SZFVICB PUYD CAPITAL FUYD FOUTH HAV~H II ?U9D g°CflBATI04 FB3 CLASS FU?,'D I9TEHNAL SZVICB FUSD UTILITY FUVO OFPSITB PACILiTY PU9D-iiAiBR OFFSITH FACILITY FUVD-SfiiBR GAP.AGB II FC'iD TOTAL COU`TY P':!iDS SCHOOL OP?~ATING FUND SCHOOL CAFBTESIA FUND SCHOOL PBD°HAL PnOGHA$S FUND scHaaL TfiyTxoo~ FUND TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS TOTA6 flfiVfiNUfiS ALL FUNDS . :~ 568,x12,599 6,128,889 J25,000 31x,122 379,165 I,2°.9,S1I 8,946,519 90,094 193,951 233,100 x81,358,813 ~63,E29,306 2,x15,000 1,128,011 532,a5a S6x,305,Z38 ------------- S1S5,661,05I May 28, 1991 3~5 r~,.SGNHEL " _ ---- ~~EP,ATItiC - -- PITAL----17- -------- ~~• AtiSF?r".S ------------ "TOTAL C;,NTP,AL ACCJUHTI'~'G PAYP OLL 'I9 c3~- J '~ y -----79 417-- ------------------------ ------------ . P9?LIC TflANSPGTATIOH 113,310 1S,1a0 398,953 128,496 yAHAGBYEHT AHD BUDGET 81,516 70'200 18 250 10,200 EISg >4AHAG8HF';T PF.OCURFNEHT S??YICES a0,694 , !,064,673 105,826 1 145 367 FiP.E A1iD RESCU? 202,412 23,886 2,400 ~ , , 229 698 ADHINIST°ATiOY 59,160 192 313 , OPERATI09S ~~'P°ORT S~7iCZS 1,320,031 , 1? ~1 3,•,4 124,158 116,891 1 513 515 +uLUHTBE,°. ~.-~ ,e ~, -•9,6"0 ?35,435 40,200 , , 545,211 ~OLUNTEE3 ;;C~3 54,300 55,000 109,800 20CHRL CO~YUIiICATiGYS lO6,aS9 5,000 111,869 ASST CO ADyIH-~uY!+UHITT ?'.;,5 lla,ol2 3'`70 1a 5DO 3,000 G~NBRAL SF.'.YICZS 191,791 , 21 7Sfl (lo,aoo! :2s,112 SOLID YASTB , 219,559 r-.iFUSB COLL~CTIOY ~ECYCLIIi~: 763 221 ? 23,OOa 229,914 1 916 143 LOAF COLLBC;ION 19,419 20 544 41,000 8,000 , , 68,419 °SGINEBRIHG , 25,300 45,844 2HGINEERING I'A~TISG A Z5C0?DS 234,029 11,211 10,000 (91,5841 163 661 COHSTP.UCTiCN I1;SPBCTI~9 103,071 128 880 10,264 11,CD0 (39,158) , 84,511 ~SAIHAGE , 103,323 9,364 46 934 (51,730) 9 80,514 OADWAY ' 45,070 , 1 700 1,807 241,824 ~". .EBT LIGiii'iC 52,110 :~iLDISG $AISTENAHCB 98,441 98,441 ~UiLDIRG L+AIHTE?lAHC3 JANITORIAL SBRYICES 1 ' 141,851 211,321 302,043 35 922 18,815 (20,000) 439,415 7 A5 HIHG h ZOHItiG , 9,000 311,2!9 ADHINISTRATICH ZONING OEDINAHCB 213,939 5~ 618 "' 331,611 PLANNING COHHISSION OBYBLOPNENT AHD IHSPBCTICSS 16,195 3,000 0 19,195 ADBINISTRATION IHSPBCTICtiS 54,092 20,286 DBYB60PNEtiT P.EYIE14 280,291 26 116 11,290 14,318 231,581 ASST CO ADHIY-GYAH S?7IC?S ': , 100,733 8 405 26 816 ' OUNDS ElAIRTEYANCB , 758 109,903 COgNDS YAI'.iTENAIiCE ' 634,996 3x4 913 LFA. COLL cCiIGY , 1,019,909 Y~RYBT SI:tiS 0 :AE?S AHD ~'~»~ATI09 4,200 4,200 CCL~?NIT°• aD;JCATICY :~iSt7:~ .-rT,.,.,._ _.. ,:~,.~.:~:.. •!,111 102 572 I' ,. 0 5,111 CoTD00~ A7Si33 ^ , 40,134 1,C0 2 .11 1r3,Si2 S_14I vR CIiiZ;.SS 36,123 3 :90 43,161 , 90,389 r - May 2 8 , 19 91 ,~ ------------------- ---------------------- PEP.SOIIHEL GPEP.ATIN,r, CAPITAL ;'AAHSPB?S "OTAL -------------------------------- POUTS EAVEH II FUND 219,022 6c,700 1 000 , 348,122 P,?CREATIOII FBB CLASS FUND _ CONyONITY BDUCATIOH LBISUAE ACTIVITIES 60,115 20,300 2,000 83 015 OUTCOOR ADVENTURE 25'836 6 459 9,400 2,000 , 61'236 3ENiUA CITIZ?NS ~ , 6,476 24,000 832 24 4'150 x5,209 r?CIAL EVENTS ~;iERAPEUTICS 2,153 ' 43,700 10 000 3 000 SI,308 ADULT ATSLBTICS 6,997 43 598 ?,100 , 1,000 3,853 11,091 FOOTS ATHLETICS ' :3,500 1,000 58,098 ADBIHISTAATION PART CONSBRVATION 4,914 X15 1,000 9FS 1,000 11,914 ------------ -- 1,000 TOTAL FBB CLASS FUND 51,208 ____ ---- :?8,801 _ -- ""-"-""" 23,150 ------------ 0 ------- 319,165 INTERNAL SBRVICB FUND l4AHAGEHENT IHFORNATIOH SFSiBHS AuHINISTRATIOH OPERATIONS 154,483 13,800 ^EVBLOPSEHT 83 486 + 244 239 a :.5,100 14,597 ?1,208 168,283 :30,991 %ND USER C08HUHICATIONS , 43,952 1,450 12,900 ;;,000 254,689 224,881 213,809 56,852 __________ _ __ 438,696 DOTAL INTERNAL SVCE FUHOS 15I,041 ___________ 433,659 ----------- " I1,S91 ---- ?1 208__ _ -- , ,,299,511 UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLBCTIONS HETBB RBADIHG 101,315 100,095 UTILITY DEPT 53,459 8,111 2!,000 201,410 86,236 ADtlIAISTRATION KATBB OPERATIONS 198,569 t 4,533 1,200 YATBB BAIHTBHAHCB 391,008 162 294 I,462,15I 40,000 250,302 1,899,159 SBYEQ OPERATIONS S , 30 359 ~ :98,890 319 192 282,060 843+244 BYBB BAINTEYANCB SANITARY SBYEII EVALUATION 423,554 315 , 218,304 51,000 BSO,ISI 692 862 NON-DBPARTB>:HTAL-i1ATBR ,041 151,918 45,200 , 518 219 NON-OBPABTBENTAL-Se73R 1'481'342 161,350 , 1 654 692 ------------- -1=T42,o90 206,154 , , 1,949 644 DOTAL UTILIT Y FUI;D I,o81,6S3 ""--'----- 5,441,3So ---- -'-_---- 449 460 ---•------- 374 10 , ------ 3 , , 4 2,946,57 n* May 28, 1991 389 3. and capital, at June 30, 1991, are reappropriated to the 1991-92 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of until the completion of by appropriate action, completion of a capital project and transfer to This section applies to the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated the project or until the Board of Supervisors, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon project, staff is authorized to close out the the funding source any remaining balances. appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1991, and appropriations in the 1991-92 budget. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None 0-52891-8 That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating ?• Ordinance authorizen the ac isition of necessa easemeats to construct the Roanoke River Se~-er Znterce~tor Phase III Proiect Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance upon second reading. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None At Supervisor Eddy~s suggestion, Mr. Mahoney will include as a part of the negotiations conducted the possible use of these May 28, 1991 39 1 65.00-2-43 65.00-2-44 West Salem Associates 65.00-2-54 Regine N. Archer 64.02-1-21 Homer J. Duncan 64.02-1-57 Canaan Land Company 64.02-1-51 Carolyn C. Jay 64.02-2-53 Allied-Signal, Inc. 65.00-2-49 Allied-Signal, Inc. 54.04-2-19 Bennie T. Jr. and Linda J. Altizer Charl 54.04-2-8 es W. and Pamela B. Bayse T. E. Beason Heirs 2• That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40; of the 1991 tax assessment for the permanent easement area to be acquired; and 3• That the consideration for each easement, not to exceed an aggregate sum of $10,800.00, shall be paid from the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project Fund; and, 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. on motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw 3• Ordinance authorizinc cenvevance of a .4 acre parcel of real estate located on Route 311 in the Catawba Ma ~sterial D atrist to Sherill L. anA Maxine smith. 0-52891-9 Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance upon second reading. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens May 28, 1991 393 3. That conveyance of the subject parcel, described as .4 of an acre located on Route 311 adjacent to the Catawba African Church (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-73.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, to Sherrill L. Smith and Maxine Smith is hereby authorized. 4. That the offer of Sherrill L. Smith and Maxine Smith of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500) for the purchase of this property is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of this property are to be allocated to the School Capital Improvements Fund; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw IN RES APPOINTMENT8 1• Board of Zoninc A~oeais Supervisor Eddy reappointed Eldon Karr to another five-year term which will expire June 30, 1996. ?. Parks and Recreation Adviso Commission Supervisor Eddy reappointed Paul Bailey to another three- *,, May 28, 1991 3g 5 T8I8 DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R-CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 28, 1991, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1• Approval of minutes - April 23, 1991. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission and Parks & Recreation Advisory commission. 3. Acceptance of "Sanitary Sewer Extension" for Lots 34, 35, 36, and 37, Block 16, Survey No. 2, "Mount Vernon Heights". 4. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving 419 office Building (La Premier Office Building). 5. Approval of Public-Private Partnership Request with Plantation & Kanter for Medeco. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution with Item K-5 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ,, +~ May 28, 1991 39 7 completed. (3) He acknowledged the significant economic impact of the recent soccer tournament and requested that the Chairman direct staff to cooperate fully for future tournaments. He asked that resolutions of appreciation be sent to people involved. (4) He expressed support for Mr. Hodges response to the County budget problems for 1992 by his efforts at reducing the staff by 20 positions. SIIPERVISOR ROHERB: (1) He expressed his opinion that executive sessions are unnecessary and indicated that he will vote against future executive sessions unless they involve personnel or negotiation matters. BIIPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) He advised that the VACo/VML task force met in Richmond last week and will meet again June 5, 1991, to discuss the final half of draft legislation to be presented to the General Assembly through the Grayson Commission. IN RE: CITIZENB~ COMMENT8 AND COI~QiONICATIONB Ms Patricia Barnett 4926 su arloaf Mountain Ro expressed her concern about dusk to dawn lights infringing on the rights of neighbors and requested that the County consider requiring light blocking devices. Mr. Mahoney will respond to Mrs. Barnett and the board members as to what action could be taken under the County ordinances. IN RE: RBPORTB n~ May 28, 1991 ~9 9 At 6:05 p.m., Supervisors Nickens moved to return to open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None RE80LUTION 52891-11 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS GELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2• Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. r .~ . May 28, 1991 401 EVENING SESSION (7:30 p M.) IN RE: RECONVENEMENT Chairman McGraw reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m, IN RE: RECOGNITIONS Chairman McGraw recognized Mr. Russell Potter who teaches chess at Penn Forest Elementary School. Mr. Potter was accompanied by a number of his students and their parents. MY--. Potter introduced those students who participated and received awards in various chess tournaments. IN RE: PIIBLIC BEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 591-i Ordinance aIDandin ordinance x2391-14 reapportioninc the representation in the Board of su ervlsors b alterin t boundaries of the election districts a establishing votinv tirecincts. 0-52891-12 Mr. Mahoney advised that the County~s redistricting ordinance had to be amended to conform with the revised redistricting plan adopted by the General Assembly and to avoid split districts. Mr. Mahoney advised that the ordinance does not alter the population of any of the supervisor election districts but contains three changes. These are: (1) changes in the boundaries ;,. . ~ , May 28, 1991 o .~ Vinton Magisterial District Cave Spring Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District from each of which there shall be elected one member of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and 2• That the outside boundaries of the five said magisterial districts shall be as follows: Catawba Magisterial District Beginning at the common corner -between Craig, Montgomery, and Roanoke counties; thence with the line between Craig and Roanoke counties along the crest of North and Brush Mountains in a northeastern direction to the common corner in the line between Roanoke, Craig, and Botetourt counties; thence with the line between Roanoke and Botetourt counties in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of-way line of Interstate 81; thence with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 to its intersection with Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road), said point being on the northerly boundary of the City of Roanoke and the northerly right-of-way of Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road); thence in the southwesterly direction of Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) and with the City of Roanoke co intersection with Cove Road; thence witho Cove Roade andtwithhthe City of Roanoke corporate lines in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with the east corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a northwesterly direction to Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road); thence with the east co of Salem and Virginia Primary Route i4"P19rate line of the City Interstate 81 and the north corporate line of(the City of Salem thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and Interstate 81 in a southwesterly direction to the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction and with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and southerly direction to a point on the corporate line of the City of Salem at a point where the said line turns from southeast to northeast near the 1990 terminus of State Route 736 (Mowles Road); thence with a line in a southwesterly direction to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of Twelve O'clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the crest of Twelve O~Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between the Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with State Secondary Route 612; thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in a direction to a point of intersection witheStatel Secondary sRoute w May 28, 1991 4 V 5 Beginning at a point where Virginia Secondary Route 668 (Yellow Mountain Road) crosses the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southerly direction until Virginia Secondary Route 668 (Yellow Mountain Road) intersects Route 667 (Mayland Road); thence in a southeasterly direction with Secondary Route 667 to its intersec- tion with State Route 666 (Bandy Road); thence in a northeasterly direction with State Route 666 to its intersection with State Route 667 (Old Virginia Springs Road); thence southeasterly with State Route 667 (Old Virginia Springs Road) extended to the Roanoke/ Franklin County line; thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line in a southwest to northwest direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to a point where State Secondary Route 691 crosses said Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence in a northerly direction with the State Secondary Route 691 to its point of intersection with State Secondary Route 690; thence with State Secondary Route 690 in a northerly direction to its intersection with U. S. Highway 221; thence in a northeasterly direction with U. S. Highway 221 to a point where said route enters the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly and easterly direction until it intersects with the western side of Virginia Secondary Route 668 (Yellow Mountain Road) at the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Macisteria istrirt Beginning at a point on the east side of Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road) and the north side of Virginia Secondary Highway 635 (Keagy Road) a common corner on the City of Salem/City of Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road) in a south- southeasterly direction to the intersection of Virginia Highway 713 (Glen Heather Road); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Virginia Highway 713 (Glen Heather Road) in an easterly direction to the intersection with State Secondary Route 686 (Grandin Road Extension); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of State Secondary Route 686 (Grandin Road Extension) in an easterly direction to the west outside bounda Subdivision; thence with the west corporate line f therCity lof Roanoke to Garst Mill Road; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Garst Mill Road in an east-northeasterly direction to the intersection of Grandin Road Extension; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension in an easterly direction to the center of Mudlick Creek; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to U. S. Highway 221; thence leaving the co with U. S. Highway 221 in caa so thweste ly directionc to kState Secondary Route 690; thence southerly with State Secondary Route 690 to State Secondary Route 691; thence with State Secondary M , May 28, 1991 ~n 7 Bonsack Precinct Beginning at a point of intersection of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence in a southwesterly direction with the Blue Ridge Parkway to the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob; crest of Stewart's Knob in a westerly d recdn to aepointgonpthe east corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke ina north-northwester~~ direction to its intersection with State Secondary Route 611 (Read Mountain Road); thence in a eas~}~ westerly direction with Secondary Route 611 until it intersects with the crest of Read Mountain Extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects with the Roanoke/ Botetourt County line; thence southeasterly with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Bonsack United Methodist Church - Voting Place Botetourt Springs Precinct Beginning at the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek to Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road); thence with Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) in a westerly direction to the west fork of Carvin Creek; thence with the west fork of Carvin Creek in a northwesterly direction. approximately 1,000 feet to a where the center line of the present Cross Timbers Trail,~lf extended, would intersect the said west fork of Carvin Creek; thence with the center line of Cross Timbers Trail extended in a southwesterly direction to the true center line of the existing Cross Timbers Trail; thence with the center line of Cross Timbers Trail to its intersection with Virginia Secondary Route 628 (Wood Haven Road); thence with State Secondary Route 628 (Wood Haven Road) west to the west right-of-way of Interstate Route 581; thence north with the west right-of-way line of Interstate Route 581 to Interstate Route 81; thence east with the southerly right- of-way of Interstate 81 to the Botetourt/Roanoke County line being the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Hollins Fire Station - Voting Place Burlington Precinct Beginning at a point at the intersection of U.S. Highway 11 (Williamson Road) and Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road); thence west with Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) $ May 28, 1991 ~n Beginning at the top of Brush Mountain at the Montgomery-Roanoke-Craig County line; thence with the Roanoke- Craig County line in a northeasterly direction to the Roanoke- Craig-Botetourt County line; thence with the Roanoke-Botetourt County line in a southerly direction to the crest of Tinker Mountain; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in a westerly direction to the top of McAfee Knob on Catawba Mountain,; thence continuing in a westerly direction with the crest of Catawba Mountain to the Roanoke-Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke-Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Catawba Fire Station - Voting Place Cave s rin Precinct Beginning at a point at the intersection of U.S. Highway 221 (Brambleton Avenue) and State Secondary Route 720 (Colonial Avenue); thence east with State Secondary Route 720 (Colonial Avenue) to State Secondary Route 687 (Penn Forest Boulevard); thence continuing east with State Secondary Route 687 (Penn Forest Boulevard) to State Secondary Route 800 (Chaparral Drive); thence southwest with State Secondary Route 800 (Chaparral Drive) to State Secondary Route 613 (Merriman Road) thence with State Secondary Route 613 southeasterly to State Secondary Route 1726 (Cartwr ght Drive), thence with Cartwright Drive in a southwesterly direction to State Secondary Route 897; thence with State Secondary Route 897 in a westerly direction to U.S. Highway 221 (Brambleton Avenue); thence with U.S. Highway 221 (Brambleton Avenue) in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Cave Spring Elementary school - voting place Clearbrook Precinct Beginning at a point in the City of Roanoke corporate line where U.S. 220 south exits the City; thence with the southerly boundary of the City of Roanoke in a northeasterly direction to a point where it intersects Secondary Route 668 (Yellow Mountain Road); thence in a southerly direction until Route 668 (Yellow Mountain Road) intersects Route 667 Road); thence in a southeasterly direction with Secondary aRoute 667 until it intersects with Secondary Route 666 thence in a northeasterly direction with Secondarya Route a666 {Bandy Road) to its intersection with State Route 667 (Old Virginia Springs Road); thence southeasterly with State Route 667 (Old Virginia Springs Road extended) to the Franklin County line at the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains; thence with the Roanoke-Franklin County line in a southwesterly to northwesterly direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to State Secondary Route 613; thence northerly along State Secondary Route 613 until it intersects the Blue Ridge r May 28, 1991 ~~ line to a point where Dry Branch forks into an easterly and westerly fork; thence with the easterly fork of the said Dry Branch as it meanders in generally a northwesterly direction to where this branch or hollow intersects a fire trail at the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain, the said branch or hollow crosses the boundary of the Haven State Game Refuge and is approximately 8,600 feet southwesterly of its eastern most corner; thence with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain and generally a southwesterly direction to its intersection with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the said Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a southeaster-ly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Glenvar Elementary School - Voting Place Green Hill Precinct Beginning at a point on U.S. Interstate 81 at its intersection with Secondary Route 640 and opposite and north of the City of Salem corporate limits; thence south to the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction and with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and southerly direction to a point on the corporate line of the City of Salem at a point where the said line turns from southeast to northeast near the 1990 terminus of State Route 736 (Mowles Road); thence with a line in a southwesterly direction to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of 12 O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the crest of 12 O'Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to the intersection of State Secondary Route 612; thence following a }~=rj_--- `---- the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally southwesterly direction to its intersection with State Secondary Route 916 on the Montgomery/Roanoke County line; thence with the Montgomery/Roanoke County line in a northerly direction to U.S. Interstate 81; thence in a northeasterly direction with U.S. Interstate 81 to the point of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Fort Lewis Fire Station - Voting Place Hollins Precinct Beginning at the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek as it meanders to Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road); thence easterly with Virginia Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) to its intersection with Route 11 (Williamson Road); thence in a southeasterly direction with Route 11 (Williamson Road) to its intersection with State Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); May 28, 1991 4~ ~ Catawba Mountain in an easterly direction to the top of McAfee Knob; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in an easterly direction to the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81; thence west with Interstate 81 to its intersection with a service road identified as Loch Haven Drive; thence north with Loch Haven Drive to Loch Haven Country Club; thence north with the road to Loch Haven Country Club to State Secondary Route 1404; thence in a westerly direction with State Secondary Route 1404 to the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence north with the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Masons Creek to the intersection of Virginia Route 311 and State Secondary Route 863; thence north with Virginia Route 311 to the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence leaving Virginia Route 311 with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain in a westerly direction to the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Mason Cove Elementary School - Voting Place Mountain vier precinct Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Botetourt County line at its intersection with U. S. Primary Route 11 (Williamson Road); thence in a westerly direction with U. S. Primary Route 11 (Williamson Road) to its intersection with Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road); thence in a southerly direction with Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road to a intersects with the north corporate line of)the Citylof Roanoket thence northeasterly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke as it meanders until it intersects with Secondary Route 611 (Read Mountain Road); thence in an easterly direction with Secondary Route 611 (Read Mountain Road) until it intersects with the crest of Read Mountain Extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence northwesterly with the said Roanoke/Botetourt County line to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Mountain View Elementary School - Voting Place Mount Pleasant Precinct Beginning at the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton and the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke at the Roanoke River; thence with the Roanoke River in a southeasterly direction to the Roanoke-Bedford County line; thence in a southerly direction with the Roanoke River/Roanoke County/Bedford County line to the Roanoke/Franklin/Bedford County line; thence r May 28, 1991 Virginia Avenue; thence with the corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a northeasterly and easterly direction to Wolf Creek; thence with Wolf Creek and the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly direction to Washington Avenue; thence with Washington Avenue in a westerly direction to Pollard Street; thence with Pollard Street in a southerly direction to Virginia Avenue at First Street; thence with Virginia Avenue in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District Vinton Fire Station - Voting Place Oak Grove Precinct Beginning at a point on the east side of Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road) and on the north side of Virginia Secondary Highway 685 (Keagy Road) being a point on the City of Salem/City of Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road) in a south- southeasterly direction to the intersection with State Secondary Route 1316 (Stoneybrook Drive); thence in a southwesterly direction with State Secondary Route 1316 (Stoneybrook Drive) to State Secondary Route 702 (Castle Rock Road); thence in an easterly direction with State Secondary Route 702 (Castle Rock Road) to State Secondary Route 1688 (Longhorn Road); thence south with State Secondary Route 1688 Secondary Route 1687 (Brahma Road); hence osoutheast w th State Secondary Route 1687 (Brahma Road) to the crossing of the Appalachian Power Company high tension Glen Lyn-Hancock electric transmission line; thence with the Appalachian Power Company high tension Glen Lyn-Hancock electric transmission line in a southwesterly direction to State Secondary Route 689 (Roselawn Road); thence northwest with State Secondary Route 689 (Roselawn Road) to State Secondary Route 692; thence west with State Secondary Route 692 (Mount Chestnut Road) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly direction to its intersection with the crest of 12 O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with a line in a north- easterly direction to a point on the south corporate line of the City of Salem near the 1990 terminus of State Route 736 (Mowles Road); thence with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Oak Grove Elementary School - Voting Place ocden Precinct Beginning at a point on State Secondary Route 720 (Colonial Avenue) and the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with State Secondary Route 720 (Colonial Avenue) in a southwesterly direction to State Secondary Route 687 (Penn Forest Boulevard); thence east with State Secondary Route_ 687 (Penn Forest- Boulevard) to State Secondary Route 904 (Starkey :* R May 28, 1991 meanders to a point where Dry Branch divides into an east and west fork at the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with State Route 419 (Electric Road); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a south-northeasterly direction to a point on the City of Salem, Roanoke County, and City of Roanoke line at Green Ridge Road; thence in a southeasterly direction with Green Ridge Road to its intersection with Cove Road; thence in an easterly direction with Cove Road at its intersection with Green Ridge Road; thence north with Green Ridge Road to its intersection with Wood Haven Road; thence east with Wood Haven Road to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Glen Cove Elementary School - Voting Place Plantation Precinct Beginning at a point where Route 11 (Williamson Road) intersects Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); thence southeasterly with Route 11 (Williamson Road) until it intersects Secondary Route 623 (Florist Road); thence in a southeasterly direction with Secondary Route 623 (Florist Road) until it intersects the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly direction with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke until it intersects Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road); thence in a northwesterly direction with Virginia Primary Route 115 (Plantation Road) to a point where the said road intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence with the east fork of Carvins Creek in a southwesterly direction as it meanders to a point opposite the center line extended of Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive); thence northwesterly with the center line of Secondary Route 1821 (Clubhouse Drive) to its intersection with U.S. Route 11 (Williamson Road) the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Roanoke Valley Christian Schools - Voting Place Poaces Mill Precinct Beginning at a point on the western right-of-way of U. S. Highway 221 (Bran-bleton Avenue) and its intersection with ------ .-~.. Ran Lvnn Road; thence in a no hwesterly direction with ~?g`-'°~==cot Ran Lynn Road to its intersection with State Route 689 690 (South Roselawn Roa 1; thence with State Secondary Route 690 fSouth1 Roselawn Roa a north~Fes~}~ easter v direction to its inte section with State Route 689 fRoselawn Road1• thence in a Wort a d' ection with State Route 689 fRoselawn Road1 to State Secondary Route 692; thence west with State Secondary Route 692 (Mount Chestnut Road) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly direction to its intersection with the crest of Twelve O'clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the. F May 28, 1991 Road); thence north with Old McVitty Road to its intersection with Cordell Drive; thence west with Cordell Drive to Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road); thence north with Virginia Primary Route 419 (Electric Road); to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church - Voting Place Woodlands Precinct Beginning at a point on the northerly right of wav of Virginia Hicrt,~ua„ 117 (PPtr~rc r+se~. n ~. ..~n n~nu - one ce w1 the west o Garvin C ek i s no hwester direction a ox'matel feet to a point where tt,o ..e„~..._ , : __ _ ,. . . ^~uj~ 1~i~ersecL sa1C1 west fo 0 Garvin Creek• thence with the center 1' a of Cross T' ers T extended in a southwesterl direction to the true centerli e o the existing Cross Timbc~rc Tra i 7 . ,..ti...___ ___ ~L . . .(Peters Creek Road1 to the place of BeainninQ Hollins Magisterial District Northside Junior Hiah School Votin P1 ce 4. That there is hereby established a central absentee voter election district or precinct in accordance with the provisions of Section 24.1-233.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The location of this central absentee voter election district or precinct shall be the Cave Spring Rescue Squad Building. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Johnson 591-2 An Ordinance to resone 1.465 acres from -i to` M 2 to operate a highoray construct ~~ otfiCe arm ehww i i May 28, 1991 42 y zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Carter M. Coffey Action Contracting Co. Inc.. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1. Use of property shall be limited only to a contractor's storage yard and office, and any use permitted in the M-1, Light Industrial District. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southerly side of Milk- A-Way Drive, (Virginia Secondary Route #1914 iron pin bein a ). said g pproximately 589.6 feet easterly along the said southerly side of Milk-A-Way Drive from Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route #115), and also marking the northeasterly corner of the land of Robert D. Peters. Thence with the southerly side of Milk-A- Way Drive, N. 64 deg. 52' 00" E. 206.39 feet to an iron pin; thence with a curve to the left whose radius is 50 feet and whose arc distance is 104.72 feet and whose chord bearing and distance is N. 64 deg. 52' 00" E. 86.60 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the said Milk-A-Way Drive, S. 85 deg. 08' 00" E. 8.30 feet to an iron pin on the line of Darymen, Inc.; thence with the line of Dairymen, Inc. S. 27 deg. 40' 30" E. 204.32 feet to an iron pin on the line of Peter L. Williams; thence with the line of said Williams, S. 62 deg. 55' 00" W. 247.31 feet to an iron pin marking an angle point in the line; thence partially with the line of the said Williams and partially with the line of the said Hollins Manor, S. 62 deg. 28' 30" W. 52.69 feet to an iron pin, a corner with the Peters; thence with the said Peters, N. 27 deg. 36' 00" W. 219.13 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 1.456 acres. "M May 28, 1991 423 held May 28, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 7, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.13 acre, as described herein, and located on the southwesterly side of Route 419 north of Grandin Road Extension, (Tax Map Number 67.18-1-1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Gofland L'mited. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Martin and Associates dated 2/20/91. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the southwesterly side of Route 419 and the easterly corner of property owned by Good Shepherd Lutheran May 28, 1991 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ORDINANCE 52891-~5 VACATING THE EASTERN 3.5- FOOT PORTION OF A 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SECTION 11, WOODBRIDGE SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Mark C. Lyon and Lisa T. Lyon have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 3.5-foot section of a twenty (20') foot sanitary sewer easement ten (10') feet of which is located on their property (Lot 6, Block 2, Section 11, Woodbridge Subdivision) in the Catawba Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 11, at page 145 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code og Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, ~~AS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 14, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1• That a 3.5-foot section of a twenty (20') foot sanitary sewer easement ten (10') feet of which is located on Lot 6, Block 2, Section il, Woodbridge Subdivision in the Catawba Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 11, at page May 28, 1991 42 ~ 0-52891-16 There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance upon the second reading. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ORDINANC$ 52891-16 VACATING AN EBIBTING 15- FOOT SANITARY 88WER EABBMENT A8 ggpy~ ON A PLAT OF MEADOWBROOIC VILLAGE. PHASE IV TOIINHOIISEB (PB 12, PAGE 18) WHEREAS, J. H. Fralin & Son, general contractors, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate an existing 15-foot sanitary sewer easement located on Lots lA, 2A, 3A, and 4A, Block 4, Meadowbrook Village Phase IV Townhouses as shown in Plat Book 12, at page 18 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, ~~AS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 14, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: '`,~ . May 28, 1991 42 9 _.. 1. Douglas E Brinckman Attorney for Houston Motor Excess requested an extension for submitting construction bids on Smith Gap Landfill which are due May 31, 1991. Supervisor Nickens explained that any request for an extension of time should be directed to the Roanoke County Resource Authority. He advised that the Roanoke County Resource Authority could review the proposals and decide to accept additional bids. 2• William T Carter 4435 Cordell Drive landowner in Montgomery County and resident of Roanoke County, questioned who will construct, own and operate the landfill. He expressed his concern about whether the Smith Gap Landfill will accept out of state garbage, his opposition to the rail spur and possible contamination of Spring Hollow Reservoir. Supervisor Nickens advised that the Roanoke County Resource Authority will construct, operate and own the Smith Gap Landfill and transfer station. The intent is to not accept waste from out of state but accept the refuse stream from the valley governments first, and possibly outside but still within the state. 3. Pat Lavery 4759 North Fork Road ~t~~ E11~ VA expressed her concerns about valley water in .connection with. the potential rail spur to the landfill. 4 • I~uise Snanaler 4731 o t, ~.,,a. E1 ictnw May 28, 1991 `~ 3 ~! ?~ ADDtoval of additional engineerinc services for 8orsnc Ho pow Reservoir. A-52891-18 Mr. Hodge advised that this is a request for $150,000 to be transferred from the utility fund to the Spring Hollow account in order to pay the total costs of $188,982 for design changes. In response to Supervisor Eddy~s question about the specific utility fund, Ms. Hyatt advised that this will be a loan from the unappropriated balance and water off-site facilities fund. The resolution following states that this loan will be reimbursed by bond proceeds. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the additional engineering services for Spring Hollow Reservoir. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ~. A~Droval o esolutio for reimbursable eaesnsss ed o B R-52891-19 Mr. Hodge advised that this resolution will make it possible for the County to be repaid once the bonds are issued. Ms. Hyatt advised that this resolution is due to new treasury :'~ , . May 28, 1991 ~ `~ expenditures paid by the County (including expenditures previously paid by the County to the extent permitted by law) in connection with the Project before the issuance of the Bonds by incurring such tax-exempt debt to pay all or any portion of the costs of the Project. Section 2 . source o Interim Finan ; r,ci and Payment of ~• The County expects to pay the capital expenditures related to the Project and incurred before the issuance of the Bonds with an interfund loan from the County s general fund and from a temporary loan of any revenues derived from the County~s water system available for such purpose. The County expects to pay debt service on a portion of the Bonds in the principal amount of $15,000,000 from its general fund consisting of general tax revenues and on the remaining portion of the Bonds from revenues derived from users of the County~s water system, including the Project when completed. Section 3. Effective Date• Publi Inspection. This Resolution shall be~~in full force and effect upon its adoption. The Clerk of the County shall file a copy of this Resolution in the records of the County within 10 days after its adoption and thereafter keep it continuously available for inspection by the general public during the County~s normal business hours. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None °M . . Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 8, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Hollins Branch Library, this being an adjourned meeting from May 28, 1991 for the purpose of a Strategic Planning Session. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 7:55 a.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson MEMBERS A88ENT: Supervisor Richard W. Robers (arrived at 1:00 p.m.) STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board IN RE: VIEWING OF VIDEO The Board members viewed the video "What's Hot in Hampton", describing the new management style at the City of Hampton, 43 ~ r • 43 ~ - JtiAO 8 , ° s' (4) Create and direct positive news stories (5) Look for the story and sell it. IN RE: REGIONAL COOPERATION The Board members discussed specific issues such as water and landfill that could be addressed through regional cooperation versus general planning types of projects. Following discussion, there was Board consensus that Chairman McGraw would write Dr. James McComas, President of VPI&SU and Delegate Richard Cranwell and ask their assistance in setting up a meeting with other Roanoke Valley governing bodies to discuss issues such as long range planning, state funding losses, tourism, and sponsorship of major athletic events. IN RE: OTHER ISSIIEB: 1. Jobs and Neichborhoods: There was Board consensus that the zoning ordinance should interpret a philosophy towards increasing industry. It should be more customer/building oriented and flexible but with high standards. Greater use of neighborhood and community meetings was emphasized, as was protection of land for future commercial use. 2. Privatization: Mr. Hodge reported that a committee is studying various privatization options and will report back to the Board in June. 3. Staff Reorganization: Mr. Hodge, County Attorney Paul Mahoney and Clerk Mary Allen updated the Board on the structure reorganization of County staff. Mr. Hodge explained that the Assistant Count Administrators will not- have direct line `* r ., ~~ 8. Hotel Roanoke: Supervisor McGraw recommended putting the question of County funding of the project before the citizens in a bond referendum. 9. DiBie Caverns and Stormwater Utility: Mr. Mahoney updated the board members on these issues. 10. IIucomincr Elections: Mr. Hodge asked for board direction on requests for information from candidates. They advised that he should use his own discretion, depending upon the time and cost involved. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 3:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. r Steven A. McGraw, Chairman ACTION NO. A-62591-4.a ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board and Ratification of an Advisory Appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination were made at the June 11, 1991 meeting. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board Supervisor McGraw nominated John Hubbard to another four-year term His term will expire July 31, 1995. Ratification of Advisory Member on the Transportation Safety Commission George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering and Inspections, will replace Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning, as an advisory member. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. lien Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs ent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board File Transportation Safety Commission File d - , ___,,-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION 62591-4.b AUTHORIZING THE CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL TO APPLY FOR AN ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM GRANT FOR ROANORE COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992; and 2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992, which shall represent said program for all localities named in this resolution; and 3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant, and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and completion of the program; and 4. That the Board further accepts responsibility jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for all phases of the program; and r y 5. That said funds when received will be transferred immediately to Clean Valley Council, Inc.; all funds will be used in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its endorsement and support; and 6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council, Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the County of Roanoke and such data shall be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the County; and 7. That the Board requests the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling to consider and approve the application and program, said program being in accord with the regulations governing use and expenditure of said funds. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, McGraw A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Clean Valley Council Randolph Smith, Salem City Manager W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Brad Corcoran, Vinton Town Manager John B. Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER `? ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution requesting approval of a grant application for the Clean Valley Council COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: N~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Each year Roanoke County receives a request from the Clean Valley Council for adoption of a resolution designating the Clean Valley Council as the agency to handle litter control for Roanoke County as well as the cities of Roanoke and Salem, the Town of Vinton and Botetourt County. This resolution is necessary to apply for grant funds for operation of the program. All participating localities must adopt similar resolutions to allow the grant application to be sent to the State Division of Litter Control and Recycling. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution authorizing the Clean Valley Council as the designated agency to handle litter control for Roanoke County, and requesting approval of the grant application. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. A len Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs ~.7 -..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL TO APPLY FOR AN ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM GRANT FOR ROANORE COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992; and 2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992, which shall represent said program for all localities named in this resolution; and 3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant, and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and completion of the program; and 4. That the Board further accepts responsibility jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for all phases of the program; and 5. That said funds when received will be transferred immediately to Clean Valley Council, Inc.; all funds will be used in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its endorsement and support; and 6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council, Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the County of Roanoke and such data shall be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the County; and 7. That the Board requests the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling to consider and approve the application and program, said program being in accord with the regulations governing use and expenditure of said funds. ACTION NO. A-62591-4.c ITEM NO. ~7= AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a sanitary sewer easement in connection with The Orchards Subdivision from F & W Community Development Corporation to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : Q'~~~~,~,~,1 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of an easement for sanitary sewer purposes over and across property owned by F & W Community Development Corporation, located in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke as follows: a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 1, "The Orchards", Section 2, Applewood (Plat Book 9, page 112), from F & W Community Development Corporation, said easement being shown and designated as "NEW 20' S.S.E." on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 1 May 1991. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Resp ctfully submitted, V ckie L Hu fman Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Rnh T. _ ,7c~hnson Vote No Yes Absent Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File George Simpson, Assistant Director, Eng & Inspections Cliff Craig, Director, Utility ~' - / COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Audited Balance at July 1, 1990 7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department 9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User Fees 11/13/90 Allied Signal 11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station 12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds 12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns 12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service 12/18/90 Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station Balance as of June 25, 1991 $ of General~l~ Amount Fund Expenditures $5,653,756 500,000 (200,000) (85,421) (875,000) (174,886) (347,500) (186,850) (5,000) (9,700) $4,269,399 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 6.25 Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25$ of General Fund expenditures ($68,310,395). COIINTY OF ROANORE~ VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Code Book Supplement (9,845) September 25, 1990 Contribution to TAP - Transitional Living Center (15,000) September 25, 1990 Contribution to Darrell Shell Scholarship (1,000) October 23, 1990 Replacement of lost State Revenues for the Arts (4,250) November 13, 1990 Attorney fees for cable tv negotiations (6,800) December 18, 1990 Back Creek Fire and Rescue station (5,574) March 12, 1991 Contribution to Terry Plunk Memorial (1,000) Balance as of June 25, 1991 $ 6,531 Submitted by ~~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER I~/f ' `'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - May 1991 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,025,494.91 Payroll: 5/10/91 $ 458,315.30 5/13/91 Manual Check 396.41 5/24/91 438,758.69 897,470.40 ~3 922 965.31 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: n Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: i Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~-, F ~ ~; rte; - - is _. ~ ~ I ._ G .` a .~ ' r ' o o w fs; i ~ I t i i I , a, o c ~ . ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ! ~ i _ ~ i~ ~ ~I ~ ? I ~ i i _ ~i i i _ i i. a~ 1 i ~ , I ? ! i i i ~ 'I (' i i ~4 ; I 1 ' ~ ', :., F : cuo n ~ 'o~cN+o ~ , ~ U N ov~'r c ' ' } ; O 1 ~ . J l . ..,ot i , it MorcL~t~o-t r or. C '. ~ i o . o~oMh- ~ U c+aJ M oo RJ N ~ ,'W L( , C ,~- : I ' a O', +' 1 • I . . 1 N V ct c~L'}Ca~G~UlMG~.-0'J 07 Ul J~ M~ Nr-.~ooi M ~ V US , G~LilN00 G~M~' Ln ~ tYJ V o'.. CO CIJ .- [0 W N ~' • ' > a . . , M ~ Oi OO G~ o'o (~•~ W' fn V' 0) M G N U1 ar ' t a \ OI I o J : Oi m ' ~ ro :. ~ N r N i ' a ~ ~• ro.. J i 1 I 1! ~~I 11 F - C F ry C G+ ' Lfl '. ~' • . , ~l In N I Cti O'..V w Ly-O O h-: RT N N i~J er .r ..0 O N. G~ .- .-': I+ 'V' O'.- 6+ V <U a+ m N Ul N ~ 1'- Ur c+ ? ' CJ l hl M , I .. ~ d ~ ~, a a . :. U M V' : M c~ F v a7 v ~. to :~ o h•• c M Cv tY+ .- : C+ -- v+ M al V .-tn VCdNM~G~CTNO N OJ : N Ul V ^ ~ r'7 '. V' M ' ' N CU.. > ' N U 1 ,., - ~.. M ~ N ~ M N : P M O ': V' N M I W •- V ~ ' , O o m a, .- ..., C 1 ~ LL ~ , .- ~ h V' ~^ to , , , , , , _ 0.i .-~ L•1 ^ CU 1~- C+ 'V' ~.1' L" W N f`. Ul ~ lIi h- '. U} O V ' V Ul W 1"' - U N 7 t':. O .G ~. U} 1`. VI - ' N':, t•, ' \ .-e ro f w rp-... I . . ; ~..- '1,. Ul ~"' N ~ M~O U1 .••. N G ~- V' o. W.N .- UI N M N; , 1"' F.. pl m o a., m I j , . ' i r' " ~ i '., N'i UlI Ul.. ~ L W f ~ I f ^' ~ I ~ ~, I ~ ~... I ~ ~ !+ w t ~ ~ U H'~ ~ ~'~ I I : ~ ~ ' - ; o o+l G+ o a, '.. •- m 7 W o o ~ P- a+ U'l ~ N aU 00 ~ tll c~ c+ h ~' t OJ ~- N N of ~~ o o nJ ~' ~t M o .- m ~~ N'. M I : 1 1 a~ b : ~ . w Lf1;M o N!M .-- V`N M ~,F o ~a;N m I~,UI CU t~;M 7 o W.o N 6+ i~ ; ' .- w o N N~ ~- . MI M N .~: CLL. ~ ' i a I ~ ~ ! 4+ t•Y ,-' ,- m M , w~,, M'~. M 0] U1 M M t~-;~ N •- ^, I w f.-{ ~ w P', Lfl I ^i O ro O ' : 1 : i ^ q• :,. to Ul o Cr+ U1; .a er} o o N i ai m M' N aD c~ .- Ln [6 t~!NO~~,N Lfi 'V FNQ'~ Mb' V'hr-`a v' C(J. titN~b oGJi ~ M, M ~!J' `a C f Im'A U)' CI F- ; a I ~ ' . ! h M v' ; G~ O .O'. o OJ .- v' Ul fi+' 411 bJ . UI V' J~ , N N f V' .-' ~ V .-, r M ' O o ~''i N N ' ' ^ a' ~ .. O a Q ~ > i '>-' , , , i , ' M N ! w M M; M M CU 4J ~- q I CU W' ~ y ~ i . , ~ ~ , ' a' 1 I M N' v ~' ^ . w w m w ~ I rJ ~~ ' ; 3 >- N Z N c+ ~ c+ c~ q•:. o ~- .- U} 0 0 ~ N crJ 0.~ ~ ~i~~, N N N ~. M ~7' lfl,_ •- c , t-- - m ~ o"' ~ `v M i I v+ VJ O, ~~ ' ~ 41 0 ~ L(1 N N v : o m 7 U1 CU •b ~ 1 U ~- N i M •- M : M V' I N N G~ G+ U} 1 - h-! 7' O N W CU o M ^' ;N ~ N i 7 ~' >+ a 1 NM G+ V 0.~ N NN -- 0?. M ~; lfl P r- U ^ • N r''' ,~ e ~; O {J J.. :. ,-+':; 7 1 ; , ., , , ~- o' J V N '. .- c .o ~ t~J V '. 1i1 M Ut UJ .- o+ 00:. 'a• G~ tl+ st a7~. 06 w 'i ~ •- N t7U N ' - ' Q' ' ' ~ ~, ' i V Q' L:~ C 1 o ~t U7 . ~ .- N 1"' lil rU t,J M 7 v. al l!1 N ~ •- r' tn- ~- ! to M, M ~: N ~' U1 0 w' ~ ' y V. ' ++. m t .. . ~ O a 1 ELL: ~' a I o al .- - N N a I . F y ^ U^ I ~ O 0 O O O O Q' 'V', OJ O. ~ ~ ~ a0oooono'ooooo0 00'00-- o fUOwoo.o lllN MW;o W 0'J - v o' y ~ - 1 U ~ O O. 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O: O O O O ff' lli ^ 07, U10+NO3~;. a wo'~c~f;o':vMU1. N(U![Y+ 0- .,o w J '!y t . oooaoooaulao~o0 Lfl .-.OJ •!' w! lfl N N~~,'£1 W o. ~ O G~ M o- ' 0 J M M U I ~ . o to lfl o C G~ o o 0 0'. o 0 l ~ ~ 7 O U}.-MOO; .-NO)M V, MU' N^~•t~`1Q •F-P f NO'G ONO W Ln' M N V 1 E 7 1 . c+o,MM IMIl1•-IMMM'.NNOO. N-- i , ., , ~ 1 r- r s v~ ', a L ~ ~ i ~, 4, { w' ' ! I N a I >. ~+ a ro a i y ~ u, ~ ~, ~ ,- c m a . L rov , L v ~~' C a N ., '~ a' a a' I a: N I ' o f ^ m a a v • ~' ~ t ~ { - I ~ to +~ 6 a.: ~, LL x N~ N ro a, ~~ ~ ! 4C ro x' °rJ ' . ~ ~amH' rox Nc ro v'. vv-!a-Ne'~ N L a~ O a N~ C ~; a LJ a 4 O ! ' i o' x d N LL' .., tt? O, W O F-'. a a t- m; c O a ' ~ ~ o > : i , t f '~ ' 1-, a •. I L L w .n E LLI a .. a .y ~ u~ ~ a' N ~ a' a • N T O a 0. T ~I +' ~ C a~ ~ a : •.•NN>ov ~ °r ayc,,• .'a ro a~ tJ_c N m+^ .:~ rna~~ L c:a N-~ ' ~ 5 , x• .. m J~,aa aq ad y m a rtc• ~, x c. c a m a' a 1-+ m': m .-• C L N L ^' •O' y, L w ~ U7 N N U N U U U L L ro L E ~ 7 t : ' ' , t.. S LI ..I F .-~ a x a O, C ..+ ro G H N U ro .-~ U~ a a 4 L ~~ 3 L O O D 'D 7 0 .~+',. C O ' 0 0 U: a Ui acn ~~... a ~-~ °~ J ' GVLL L':L {- d OU L lL ' , , . , . . a C.' > NO••+I- V C.U 1• a N y 7 LL O f- a O t1 +'' a' ; U 4- . J f . ., O C a C W ?. 'p li- m C 'D OI x W R~ W y C,. N ,. ~ L ul C a J '^ a! ~ C f x O a s 1 m a v w ro N 4- t1 C N~ ro L N N a C ro U V a' tf~ 0! U LL O M p , ~ y '+ UJ.y Ut Cp y ++ ifi N ul ~~ ? G T "b I' 1-- C. Ul O O rtt a, a N u7~, ••+ L v 3' 7 a 1~ .-+ a m 'O L '~. L G ! V} O i w C~ .w C eat ~ ..~ ro~ U .-. a .~ ~ C U L UI ~ N L m -. O 'n C. C CJI A a> U a m L m L L' N U O I L 't- a Y- a a- C f- ~ ~ :L ' O .-1 N •• m E ro UU ~~+ C O N -~ a a a E V E ~n L v a a' a L E >> t6 ~•+ N U C N ~-+ % ~-+ L L 'D < L ~•• C L a a O G Z . __ r t~ O : ~ m L J] C T U C N ro ~+ a .., +~ ~ a a 7 'w T 0 0 .i L G K Y O m t+ C m a a' ~+ L~ a s J_ a ~-+ a 0 L G c~ a~ +~ +• L a~Ua~fY 7_ati 3O3OD!- U UO 2 _ . ~LLrl O_d JUtYJLL LF-~-CFO¢JGtL ~ +, L O O Z O.-(llMOO.-NM7Ul ~n D-uioa-(U V r-wc+G.-iUO^.4 c, V MouNM CU CUNMt'1 flMMMM~ 7 V'la U'1 Lil v` ~0~-'%`~CirNG~4' G O Cl 2 J . ^ .-C~(UNN•U CU id O O O G O O G O O O O U O O O O G '~ O O O U O O O y LL O O O O O O O G O R' J ` ui C O ++ N L Gi G f_ t1. ac Q ~. YJ M rG L. \ • rq U] r- O' I rn w W L a >-- ., a ¢. > c c, m - L L a A 0 m E O 7 67 C U cC. ro C C w tz S 'i- N f- U a t s_ O ~ ~ Y i+ C ..y J -~~6 O r U U a U] Ci .. x U. w O a~ 7 v ' w ; N +O 2 Q 0 L O a a tY ~ : - 1 ~ 'O 4- Ii Jt: N r ~ .:> q' 7 ~ I Oj P Q, .- ~, <t' ~ i ~ .-~ O. N O~ N c i i Cr..- Ul Ul- C' ~r O ~ ' C A. O I ~. q' c U7 q' op •O ,-: O) J• M! o U• r; [YJ a m~' c N rf'r. r- •.^, G+. •o M o y ~ +~ I~ d 3\ a I '~ o' M sh (U m sr c, o) ct rl r -- M Ul zr N M •o M r~ M c r- o x u a.I~ a+'arw rww ararc~~c. mwco~m:ma~ m,~~marMmu w c m v I. w ~ 1' , Q U1 fL i I r i v I, ~ a I G o M ~. M V' G+ O llt o Ul CU c, CU q' v': M PJ M N C' {U ! D'i r V O u iV r~ t ar 1 m N c G+ M ~'+ ,7 o ar Ul Ui (tJ r c .e, .-'. o r r N OJ '~ M 0) ~ o .-. M Ul U'i ~.. ~y U I -. Ul G+ U) M G'~ 6, q' : M q'. q' ~ q' N N f- ~tJ 4? M ~: N M : 7' •- O C, T' G~ 7 q' A C i' - ~ .. E rp I : G,, 0] q' rt N q' O] - q' Ui ~- U1 07 l}J V', G+ ..n •O r lfl '. N N OJ •-- ~' •a N U. 7 ~-+ 1 ~- v0 CU G+ M '~ N r -- -- CU N CU •- o o ul M r N ~- f^- Ul q" G+ C Si 1 ', a 1 : C I '. U '.. '. N ~ : I. '~ t '. ~ U'1 m M ', N d'. '- G~ tfi G+~ ru' er M~ .- UT m 'r ~. N 0'1 r- m ~ N ~~ e+ ul r-~ v q' V' M L A I ' q• N ~ : M {U UI M ~ v .- 7 c' o o U1 ar .- ~. M n,J i'•- ~ v .a ~ M ~ U •- n] G ~ E I; q'. N V ten, 07 Ul !. o M ~ O] o' [0 CJ, N n, N 7 C+ ~- a V cr o ~ .- o G~ c, ~7J r 7 1 - ~ - _ _ ~ V Cl I' ln~.~ O) ro]{U GC iU U].-nN ~-Ifr? q'~.n V' O -- U)q'vMMG~ +r l7 C F- 1 '~, t7 M M ~ UI o G .- ~ ,~ M1 •? t7 r' trt P rr c r i M ' ri o u rF G+ o V ', C w : - t ;. .-~ ;11 .- ~ o] UT M ''~. 0.~ r U1 o N '- r` +- lft Oi r-~. ~- "7 '. o ~ 7 r m. (U •-^ ti 'U 1 ',. ' : : t1 ~ 1 ~ ' q' ' q' ' 4 N CU m, tU -- ,. ~, .D r ' (."t . x 1 ' w" I,': ~. ~, ~J, ~. - i - ~., c u i r-vM q r ~ ;tJ rln--wo ru v~:,rtG M r <r c or ' ,+ C I ~ O r V iu U1 u' UI •-• rY~ q' .- : 7 r 'q`: N 1`i r- r ~ '7 '. ~ ro I ! c o o) G) N N M c+ 0.r r. •»' M .7 0`~ N c r : Ln '~~ •-- '~. ~ C i- I '.. _ '. .. _ - ': ro n I ~ M .- N ~.. r M ~,' M f"'t 0.~ .- l!1 ' U5 c ~ .0 c : N r V '., ~ C 1 , ~ ~ r '. ' O W 1 I ~ ~ ' a I O O .p :. r r- r- v ~ ~~ Ul CG .O ~ N r O .-..- O U'1 ~- UJ ~ Ul rl •O CU Ul O G) ' L I': ri +O .7 ~~ln rMrl ~7 crG~n'0., f- Lll o'nr UIMM N Gh ?fir uo v . : ?~ 7 I," 01 •- o tf G+ M (U Ul ~-} m 'Q' M CU Cr .-; O r o) M .- V O) N U V O 7 ~, i - .. _ _ .C .-~ 1 iU 7 Gt U7 0) ~ ' U1 er r ~'+ ~-• o nJ h f= U"I U) o M iU c v+ N U't U'1 U] v 'a I ~ ' r1 Ul N 0] ~ M1 ^- itJ M ~-. ', .:i t1J aG ?' iU lli a N N C C i ' M M M r- ~- - N (U •- '. U7 ~- ~ rl 9 a I ~. ' ', i Ci x I ~. ' : W : i. p ar r ~ G -- O O O .- r M q' 'J M G UI ri r' C M ~'. r r+ r o ffJ O .U v N 1' Nq'U'I : M U'I .oo 'N Mrc~Nr c No.-0"i .-oo ',M tliM V Imo .00) ~a 4 +~ I or-M 'UI Uiro '.M o)Ul V Ulo 7 Mrmr--r V` 0] --,-lftOO MCr iU ' 7 U t lfl Gl .- tl ri M M G~ N G G? (: ~ ~t O+ M o .- M G, CV 'ct h ~J 'J O .U C C. LL •v 1' ooh r- oq~ v woJr nJr- o] Nu)•noc.M <r ',ri r'i-MUD.-MCA 7 : ~ I cu q- ~- : r r M o nJ a, .-. M ..- r ~ .o o rr N ul ' q• v o cr, M ._ u, _ , N : I, Ul lft U'I N N o N N ~ ; ,a CU M L 1I '', ~ ' a' a ' N ! b G a E C N U' ! L I Q O U O 7 G ', ~, N N '., U U ~ O ~ O ', C N '~ C : U L L ' C7 ~ ~, ' • 'a ~ a o N a ~ u E w G) +- ~+, a~ ra L ~ .~ ~ C 0. C ~ ro U t9 ! ¢ w r_ ~. ro oat >. L u. ~ c w ' v- a a t, ~ c ~ +~ ' rn w +~ to '. ' ~ .. O I > i C ~ ~' M +~ ~-• a UI ~ C 1 x ' v- CT a I G ro ~ O ~ L C U 4. C •~+ ~ - f_ O a L: 3 .. .b Icy o I w a-. ro .. ~ ~ !o i aL a ' ~ u : N .~ ~.. G~ E j u~ 3 ~ N u ro •b ` r b ~ • N 4+ j ro +{ a 7 U i •-a •.+ a ' C V 41 '. ~ m L N ', ¢ 49 ~, ••+ C r~ W ~-+ U cC f ro 7 ! x U U ~ ~+ ro ~ a L ~ I c ro r_ ut a a s a .„ ui ut xJ a .+ t s c ...-+ .~+ u ~ j ~o a to ~ __~w~r_ .a o..o .,> +:~aaro a,tLw c ~ c ~v a u o.. Ja v.C' as o.ar_ n .. 'n.~ c c ~ N > a .-. r ~ u a c .. c ~ of m u c~ a ' 3 m ro c ui o a r_ a, , •!t .-. U' rD~+ "~ .. d O r O 4 a~ "H ... G ... U (n 0. a a a UI •^t > a T I ++ m a3 ' ~ O(Y ~~+ UU C,JO m LU 22 +~¢ s' NU) ' ro.. L '.o 3 .0 4.. ++ _7 a ro~ C a o C 72 o. ' ~'-~ ro 0 O Ul C~ O C W U L^ O Y H a a a a m O r+ U •~ U Y G '. ' N L .- ' v o w N w a .~ m M rn a N +• [ at L v ro •.. L .+ ,..c N ut ..au o L~~ o aLinE o ~a~c..roa o ,. .. a-++~+-.- o ' : ar C a 3 E U 3 L S- C ~~+ U7 L 4- ~.. rn L t= C A O. A ul 7 V ar a..-+ o o N~ o o c m~ a ~, c ro a ur ~ ~~ c o 0 JC7 W UU7 JILUUQ dU}a'S W C9 t9 k(L U70.•~Y-G) CJ o00 ooUl 00oc, Ul OU}olf+aUlo vUlorffoU'I .~ -- NM ~iU OJ --rU f^ tl"~r ~-NiUMMq' CU OJMM q"?lil ~ N iJ iU M M M M r, 4' q' q' V' 7 q' 7 Ul U, V1 U7 Ul ~: Vi U_ O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O G O O O Q O G O G O O ' 1~ t7 ~ i ; 'v V Moo vo h ~~ .o •:a M'v O o,0 0 0'0 0 t(rL11 0 ' : : C.OO I :hWM.oo iUMoUtNW ~-.WOOooo.oo triv ~' W ' l1 ~ \ a 1 O G +~ III h U t`• U~ M h .- M GPI O OJ CU r: u a~ 1 ', r- ctr c~ o o r-':~ c+ o:, r- N v c to cu W ri wC~oro I ... ~. W ~ I •, C, m w I , F- .a ~y 1 , ?- 1 ', ro I - I ' Ui a 1 CaMV' h hh hv'nh OJ G},LIOO UG• ~Nf- o Ift f^ M. In Ul C L a I 7c>>J ~ MoONIIt C' O} ~Y lflov o07 h.-o M ~-~• o M hl O v u I oo v.. ~v WGyoM -- o].-oho .-WN V v v o v -- '- ~ .n G 1 _ _ _ _ +~ '... E ti 1 o UI 7 o `n M OJ N ~ r` -- 0.~ o v o UI v lfl o Ur V' Lfi C~ h- h ~y 7~-+ I o}h.- h M ~- ~<U 0.i .OO W lflN--o.- a• hU"1 N Ur o'~ ' V M -0J ~- V' ~- CU : M N Ul N W V r• .9 CU N L ~ C C6 I _ Cl 'L I : R V' V' ti' h't M O L' 1 : i +- L ~ : '. Cr. .- ~ Lt c a I '. lfl o ~O ht o cr trl Ut v V' M N Lfi W :. ~- c, c'~ f- ..~ P' -- c+ CRI N ~ \ L 1) I ~. V• Lt7 ht Ul U1 M L1 ~•~• ~ W 7 Ut o Cu 0 0a o OJ Ol ' G N C- f- : ~ E I U U3 v,c h- '7 Uj.O h n Ui ~ Ul ~h o .- ' v G~ va o: v v ~ K C .. u q 1 ~ v .- C ~O v •o CU N CU .- c P- .-'. t` '. o Ut ' G v .- ;;J a ~+ ^ ' -+ N Lit ro C F- o ul ~ C N : M OJ N ~ ~ VI h b :lfi N '~ N M pJ ~J ~ ~t h• C o ': C W ?- I ' •- a ; M I`i :.- M C•~ N CU K5 c+: h ~O lY' V' .. :. a 1 : _ Q~ UI LLl, Gl: •b 1 .- .- ~ ', N M i C : M rl L a f-- x I~ ' - 'i M M ~O ~~ > e^, rna ~ N C U 1 ~ O CU M v! h - M '~ t0 '. u? C4 O"j a s o, ro ro I ', Ica .:5 ' pt N r- c ' ~ ~. o 0 ~ U 7 U5 ~. i6 17 i I ~ .- N ~~ ~'t M ~ ~ M : M ~ M C - U 2 ' Y E r Cu '. '~ N '' ~- .- 'T P. . ,y C U~ ~ i ! t,.l ; M S 7 C I : ' ' 2 G W i ', v.. ur r o a ~ ul ~ I L O '. 4~ 1 h h r, o v Cu a7 N w M Cu : o Ji •~) i u : v Ui v: V' ~- v ', ~£~ ' T 7 <'.. ~. L 1 ' v o iu a O) ~~ m h M o U1 aJ o rt : M : Ut ~t Ltl. Lf1 UJ N 1+ Y T ~ ! ',, t( O .-- LLl O M v] OJ ~" tla rrl f ~'1 +.J iU C, ~ O ~ T .•- .- '. rt ro d L ~•+ I G• M h' ~O w] ~l ~D V' !'-' lIt O h'1 hl ~Y h. h `Y Vt LLl O C U ++ ro 1 Ci+ t. n ltJ. V' +^ o : !:l h' N P- n_ iu CU ' ~~+ a v 1 x :>_ '.. F, 0.I CU N V' V' :. W x .-. ' W :.. . 4- .- - O 1~ MMNMo 'N ~-MN~•-oo tom- oci0oo wN ~~ MO+ N 0.t Cu ' : 1' mv~Ul lfi O mCUh~-..oo c~ ohovO t`-~ ~ v v c+ O O v ro +~ I' :aJ U' Woh :~ v'o to oUO ,ten hNouo o?N M Oi ~J v: ~O ~ r+ ~ C I a I ~ '. ~ 7 7' O, 1 ~ !n n M ~O V '.. ~O C, ~n LL't C•. o L!1 UI O• Ul o v: o V'~ lfi c Lt't M C: M M '4 L4 ro 1 W M --~r tU n UICU nJ o h M CU W'M o .;!.o .-:0 o Lp ol, .^t ~M : - a 7 I - M N ~. CO Q ~-- M +- ~- M N''- . Ifl to P 0'.1 N h ' h : ' U ,y : i ~ .- : N ',. ..-- ~ ', T :. III O)':~ ~ v] , ,O a : ' C I ' N ~.. 7 ~~. CL ' ~ : ~, Q~ E, C i V E +~ 0. • Ur ': 7 'D ' ' N C N ': x'rn ,w L Ia u c ' ~ L' O ~ I C ~ O '. u ro +. a ' ' ~ O i O I L ~•• O C N D L .+ ~ o '. Y a ; •~ a c m In 7 ~o Y Y ._ ', ~ v L a O Y O C9 I a b E,. C t7 ~ C a 7' : ' 1 Ui a i~+ L ! •.. C •+ : ^ O' O C qr rU ~ E N' N O. o' j ' C G to C 'i U !n a 3' r N T U ~+ 4+ U '+ rn ~+ L' L ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ! O Y I N U C E a: m a ' T N'. C 0.C: c0 Y ! L a: d VI : . E O E ~ . ~ CI a 0. ~~+. v U ~ r vi. L vI ... x N. tO C : ,y ~ a- L~ ' r ro v .C '. ~ i Y O >' L L •. •~. a L> W ~+ J ! 0. Ul N a b Q. U ~ C' x .r a O 7 I C 4- ro Off. N 4 O a ~ C 4-' ^ : N N .„r : N O~ W a tY 0.O '. U tv rn .-, L1 v+ a fYl a U ' ^ N. N Ut, ~~ ' L U C L x hi'. > U~ N ' E C 7 W L. ~n +. U 1 L L G' ~ '. '. ' ''. V U-. O C '' L a a r C a ~ E a O\ ••+. ro J] T rtl Q C i-. F ~0 lL : ' ', a ~+LL ~ rD W>G C NAY O W a4-Q:a cG U.,. p L'. ' , [Y w. v S a L I U C a L a G L A Z ~J ro f-: J : C 7 ,-+ 41 ~+ U E h U v rt,`•+ ,-+ U Ul v 0.L ~ C C Q J N '..-0 >•. N 17 r6 :. o C ti •„ (~ G a .-. ,-, m L fA O O 0 3~ O F- w L.-~..L ~o ..Leduc- o a.-.aLa~cL..~ o v-4- ~ o ~. ulmmL~ 'h Casa.-, ..o ri, oa.~oul.o~~+a~ c+ L~ ~ r o _[ ', ' _~ L .~' +~ r o C 0.C a .+ a• o .-~ ~.1 .+ ~ E r 0. a~ o a L o' ~ r- ' ~. q L J7 Iti C .-, K O O > J] N 0. Ut x rn 4- •ti C rp > f+ r R iD ~~+ ifi O 7 •-+ G U a 3 ••+ E .-~ 2 a a a O C C C C O S J E U U 2 U W ~ S S W E H ii tX U. U~ ~-. .r .-. z Y S L G o 0 0 0 o Ut o Ul G o c c Ui v lr i o lJt u CU Ifi - N cY O Z -- M Tl U"r v7 -- (U iu M ~~ Ur ~-. 0.1 "~ M ~' ? Ul Ll Vl ~ •n O ~ h h h h r~^ N W U! O:l O? rii ~ ~ G'~ ~~ . C Cr. C G+ T. tT a lL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G O 0 4 0 0 0 0 C> o O 0 0 C1; ACTION # ITEM NUMBER J~~ --- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE -BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 SUBJECT: Interest earned on Tax Anticipation Note COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: There has been discussion over the past several years concerning the cost of borrowing money in anticipa- tion of tax revenues and how much of this cost is recovered in interest earned on the funds before they are expended. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In February, the County borrowed $9,000,000 on a short term basis to meet various obligations until tax revenues were received later in the Spring. These funds were immediately deposited in interest bearing accounts at an average rate of 6.15 during February. The rate fell during the period, ending with an average in June of 5.55. The loan was paid in full on June 13. The interest paid on the note was $149, 435.00, which was offset by the $104, 201.67 which we were able to earn in interest. The total interest earned by the County's overall portfolio since February 13 more than covered the cost of the loan. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. -- red C. And rson Elmer C. Hodge, r. reasurer County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Robers Johnson Nickens McGraw cc: File Alfred C. Anderson ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 SUBJECT: Work Session on The Solid Waste Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The staff has developed a Comprehensive Solid Waste Plan which is required to be submitted to the Department of Solid Waste Management by June 30, 1991. The plan and associated ordinances are attached to the request for second reading in that portion of the agenda (EVENING SESSION, PUBLIC HEARING 691-5). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the work session, the staff will provide the following information: Summary of the County's current recycle program A comprehensive Solid Waste Plan summary The make up and contribution of the Recycle Advisory Committee An outline of the strategy to attain the diversion rate mandated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The plan is scheduled for public hearing during the evening session and approval will be requested following that hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: None 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends work session. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodqe County Administrator Gardner W. Smith, Director Department of General Services ~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session - Selection of Route for Water Transmission Lines COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: INFORMATION: The pending water project to construct Spring Hollow Reservoir and Water Treatment facilities includes the construction of $5,408,000 of water transmission lines. During the Work Sessions, staff will present a map of the proposed water transmission lines that will serve the County. Staff will discuss with the Board the relative merits of the various portions of the transmission lines. As a result of the Work Session, the Board would establish the priority in which the various portions of the transmission line should be constructed. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor Craig, P. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator June 25, 1991 County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning negotiations with an economic development prospect in accordance with Section 2.1-344 A 7 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. AT A RERGGiAR MEHELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRA ION CENTER COUNTY, VI ~ ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION 62591-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File ~ ~ /' Lj'/~r~ MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 1991 TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~ ~f>~~ FROM: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator RE: Spring Hollow Reservoir It is important to remember as the Board considers methods of payment for Spring Hollow Reservoir why the project is so critical to the Roanoke Valley. The local governments have been studying new water supplies for the last two decades. To date, the only new supply which has been designed and permitted is Spring Hollow Reservoir. This reservoir will allow us to perform one of the crucial duties of a local government: supply safe water to those who need it. Included in these users will be residential and commercial development, fire protection systems and recreational faciliti- es. Some people ask why we are in a hurry to begin construction. We need to begin this project immediately, because our current water system cannot meet our current demand and it will take at least three years to build the new system. We don't have time to wait. Consider that we purchase 50% of our water from the City of Roanoke, and that Carvins Cove is therefore part of "our" water system. As such, the following quotes from the January 1991 report on Carvins Cove prepared by the City's consultant offers some insight into the ability of Roanoke City to supply additional water to us: o In spite of the 1990 Census indication of no population growth in the valley, and an indication of a population decline in the City, water demand ...has continued to increase: 1980 1990 Average Daily Demand (MGD) - City Only 11.93 15.51 1 ~ ~-~~ Maximum Day Demand (MGD) - City Only (Estimated) 16.70 21.71 Peak Hour Demand (MGD) - City Only (Estimated) 23.38 30.39 (P. 2). o ... [the city's treatment] plant, including the raw water supply facilities and the backbone of the distribution system, cannot continue to sustain delivery of water at the current high demand rates and at the same time have capacity for delivering fire flows. (p. 3). o Health Department Regulations require .that when the average water production for any consecutive three month period exceeds 80% of the system's rated capacity, that the Owner (of a water system) shall cause plans and specifications to be developed for expansion of the waterworks and to include a schedule for construction.... During 1990, total water production from all of the City's water sources averaged over 80% of the rated capacity of the system during three three-month periods.... In fact, total water production averaged over 80.8% of the rated capacity for the entire year of 1990. (p. 3). o ... on 114 days out of 365 in 1990, the treatment plant operated at or above its approved capacity. (p. 4). o At this time, the water demand has exceeded the City's capacity to provide drinking water to its customers. Regardless of whether or not the City serves on additional customer, the filtration plant, the raw water supply and portions of the distribution system must be expanded and upgraded to reliably serve the existing customer base and to meet Health Department and Safe Drinking Water Act criteria. (p. 6). Remember, this report refers to 50% of the Coun 's water supply. And the proposed upgrade and expansion to the City's system does not enlarge the water supply by one drop -only the treatment capacity. And what about the rest of our water? Almost all of it is provided by wells. In 1980, we had 90 wells in operation; today, due to contamination and low flow, that number is down to 69. As development of the County continues, it is likely that contamination of ground water will also. Another question which has been raised about Spring Hollow is whether our population projections are accurate. Some people believe that the projected growth will 2 GPI-~~- not happen. But, remember that the City's consultant found an increase in water consumption even though the population decreased. During the same period, the County's population increased, as did our demand for water. I believe. there is no better predictor of the future than the past -the need of the Valley for water will only increase over the next decades, even if the population remains static. Further, the Spring Hollow project is phased -the first phase of construction will supply current needs. As growth patterns become established in the future, we will be able to expand to meet those needs at that time. .The Valley has been studying the need for water since the early 1970's. We have evaluated alternatives, and due to cost, Federal regulations and practical considerations, chose Spring Hollow as the most efficient, least impacting method of providing water. Yes, it would be nice to build this as a regional project -and it was originally planned as such. But the two cities decided in 1988 that they did not want to participate, leaving the County with two choices: going forward alone or facing the prospect of running out of water in the future. I still believe that this project has potential as a regional one, but we cannot delay it any longer. Beginning the project alone does not necessarily mean that it cannot be regional in the future. Another concern which has been raised, particularly by the editorial staff of the Roanoke Times & World News, is that by refusing to consolidate, County residents have brought the burden of paying for the reservoir onto themselves. As I am sure you remember, Spring Hollow was specifically excluded from being a joint project under the consolidation agreement -County taxpayers were to pay the bill alone, despite the economic development benefits which would accrue to the consolidated entity. Consolidation is not an issue in the financing of Spring Hollow. This Board is to be commended for the support and foresight it has demonstrated in planning for the future of the Roanoke Valley. Spring Hollow may be the most important project the County ever undertakes. The Board is also to be commended for its efforts to impact County citizens as little as possible. For example, despite the consultant's recommendations about increases in rates, the Board decided to lower those to more manageable levels. I'm sure that many people thought that building Carvins Cove was impractical, too expensive and unnecessary. Fortunately for the Valley, in the 1920's, the citizens of Roanoke planned for the future and the City has therefore been able to supply us with water. Now, in the 1990's, it is the County's chance to demonstrate the same commitment to the quality of life of our children and grandchildren. I strongly encourage the Board of Supervisors to approve the payment methods outlined in the June 25 agenda, and to authorize County staff to immediately proceed with preparation for the bond sale. 3 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of Ordinance Establishing Fines for the County Library COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In 1970, the Roanoke County Public Library stopped charging fines for overdue materials. Although it was felt that the policy engendered public good will, no study was ever done to determine if the elimination of fines improved the rate of return of library materials. It continued through the years because of the cost and complexity of manual record-keeping. Salem and Roanoke City Libraries discontinued fines when the Valley-wide card was adopted in 1986. With the advent of automation the three library systems now agree that it is appropriate to reinstate fines. The automated system has the capability to efficiently manage the process of computing fines and sending notices. Any funds which might be generated would be helpful in offsetting the increased costs of materials. Salem and Roanoke City governments have already given approval for the reinstatement of fines. The cooperation and standardization among the libraries will be damaged if one system does not charge fines. FISCAL IMPACT: Because there are many variables, it would be difficult to determine the income that would be generated by overdue fines. At this time, it is estimated to be $15,000 per year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the reinstatement of fines in order to standardize library policies in the Valley and to assist in the monetary support of the library systems. aYf-l Respectfully submitted, P-- eorge D. arretson Library Director Approved by, ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge, J . County Administrator ---------------------------- -'--- VOTE ----------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~.." AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY AD9 Ii ISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 2-5 TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE OF FINES AND FEES FOR OVERDUE, DAMAGED, OR LOST PUBLIC LIBRARY MATERIALS AND TO PROVIDE FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this proposed ordinance was held on June 25, 1991; and the second reading was held on July 9, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article I of Chapter 2, Administration, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 2-5 as follows: Sec. 2-5. Library fines and fees. There is hereby established the following schedule of fines and fees for overdue, damaged or lost public library items or materials: Overdue Fines $0.10 Adult book or material per day 0.05 Children's book or material per day 1.00 Video cassette per day 0.10 Other materials per day 5.00 Maximum fine per item Maximum fine per item for children's book or material 1.00 Fees $1.00 Replacement library card 1 l:a~t°'~ Bindery (for books damaged but usable if rebound) 6.00 Lost Materials Service charge $5.00 Lost item charge (Total = service charge + lost item charge) Each adult book $20.00 Each children's book 15.00 Each video cassette 25.00 Each multi-reel book cassette 45.00 Each single reel book cassette 10.00 Each compact disc 20.00 Denial of Privileges A person shall be denied library privileges if $25.00 in fines, fees or charges have accrued and are unpaid or if 25 or more items are overdue. 2. That these fines, fees and charges shall be credited to the library book budget account. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after August 1, 1991. 2 (, 9/- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, RATES AND FEES OF CHAPTER 22, WATER BY PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PROCEDURES, FOR AN INCREASE IN WATER SERVICE RATES, FOR AN INCREASE IN CONNECTION FEES, AND FOR CERTAIN EFFECTIVE DATES WHEREAS, by Ordinance 62486-147 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted and established water user rates for Roanoke County utility customers; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.1-292.2 and 15.1-875 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the establishment of rates and charges for water service; and WHEREAS, the first reading for this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing for this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991, after publication and notice as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 22-82, Rates and fees of Chapter 22, Water of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 22-82 Rates and fees. (a) Water service rates. The following rates and charges as established by the board of supervisors for water service shall apply where water service is provided by the county: The volume charge per 1000 gallons will be based on water used 1 ~j!" The volume charge is added to the base charge to determine the total water a ^ ~ bill. WATER RATES - Effective Dates Base Charge 1000 gallon 7 1/91 7/1/92 7/1/93 7/1/94 7/1 95 per m onth 9.46 $ $ 10.41 $ 11.45 $ 12.60 $ 13.86 0 11 - 10 - 14 14.20 15.62 17.18 18.90 50 31 20.79 34.65 15 - 17 23.67 26.04 20 43 28.64 47.52 . 52.27 57.50 18 - 28 39.27 89 54 . 60.38 66.42 73.06 80.37 29 - 39 . 71 75 83.28 91.61 100.77 110.85 40 - 54 . 47 97 107.22 117.94 129.73 142.70 55 - 69 . 57 157 173.33 190.66 209.73 230.70 70 - 111 . 66 217 239.43 263.37 289.71 318.68 112 - 153 . 58 298 328.44 361.28 397.41 437.15 154 - 210 . 49 379 417.44 459.18 505.10 555.61 211 - 267 . 06 625 687.57 756.33 831.96 915.16 268 - 440 . 64 870 957.70 1,053.47 1,158.82 1,274.70 441 - 613 . 211.33 1 1,332.46 1,465.71 1,612.28 1,773.51 614 - 853 , 552.01 1 1,707.21 1,877.93 2,065.72 2,272.29 854 - 1093 , 987.34 1 2,186.07 2,404.68 2,645.15 2,909.67 1094 - 1400 , 422.66 2 2,664.93 2,931.42 3,224.56 3,547.02 1401 - 1707 , 962.08 2 3,258.29 3,584.12 3,942.53 4,336.78 1708 - 2087 , 501.50 3 3,851.65 4,236.82 4,660.50 5,126.55 2088 - 2467 , $1.40 $1.54 $1.69 $1.86 $2.05 Volu me charge (b ) Connection fees. (1) Generally. The total water connection fee shall consist of costs and considerations associated with (a) a basic connection fee; (b) off-site facilities fee; (c) off-site and oversized main credit policy. c, Off-site and oversized main credit policy. Credits will be allowed against the off-site facilities fee for off-site extension in excess of three hundred (300) feet and/or line size in excess of minimum size required by the county. For any off-site extensions, on a public right-of-way or easement adjacent to owners' (applicant) property, credit will be allowed against the off-site facilities fee only for line size in excess of the minimum 2 ~9r-3 diameter required by the county. No credit will be allowed where a main size greater than minimum size in diameter is required to adequately serve the owner (applicant). Credits will be limited to a maximum of ~ one-fourth the amount assessed for the off-site facilities fee and are subiect to funds bein available for credits within the water off-site facilities fees fund. Credits will be computed based on recent bids taken for construction of similar water facilities. Installation of a well and/or storage facilities in excess of sixty thousand (60,000) gallons to provide a water source, and pumpage required to supply the storage facility where County facilities are not available, are considered off-site facilities for purposes of this paragraph. e. The total connection fee shall be paid as follows: ercent at time of plan approval, Twenty-five ( 2 5~ ) p } . ~ ~, • , ., ; „ seventy-five (75~) percent -- -~ ~t (balance) prior to occupancy or water use by the facility. When the off-site facilities fee is increased the applicant may pay the remaininct sevent -five 75~ ercent of the rior fee within one 1 ear after the effective date of the new fee. Thereafter the remainin sevent -five 75 ercent shall be calculated on the fee that exists at the time the balance is paid. ( 5 ) Fire Service. Al l separate f ire services shal l be properly metered and protected against backflow with a check valve. The meter vault, meter and backflow device shall be furnished and installed by the county. The total connection fee for separate fire service connections will be equal to the basic connection portion of the connection fee plus the off-site facilities fee ~s established for the size fire service requested. The se arate fire service fee is as follows: SEPARATE FIRE SERVICE FEE Fire Service Line Basic Off-Site Size (Inches) Connection Facilities Total 2 $ 2,600 $ 2,122 $ 4,722 3 3,800 4,774 8,574 4 4,500 8,487 12,987 3 ~,g~ ~ 7,600 6 19,096 948 33 26,696 44,448 g 10,500 500 12 , 53,043 65 543 ~ , 10 15,000 12 76,382 91,382 The Ut i 1 it ~ ireczvr ~«a 1=u..~-- ----- - - - for fire service when the fire service meter is laced in the same vault as the domestic service. (6) Schedule of Connection fees. The Total Connection Fee is the sum _ „__ .,.,ti.; ..ti, ; ~ ~Atermined by meter S1Ze luS tine vii-~l~G »--- t e of i - -- service and effective ze determined b meter s indicated in Tables I II & III. date as TABLE I BASIC CONNECTION FEE Basic Meter Size ERC Connection Inches $ 1.00 $ 500 5/8 in. 1.44 525 3/4 in. 2.56 700 1 in. 5.76 1,800 1 1/2 in. 10.24 2,600 2 in. 23.04 3,800 3 in. 40.96 4,500 4 in. 92.16 7,600 6 in. 163.84 10,500 8 in. 256.00 12,500 10 in. 368.64 15,000 12 in. The 5/8 inch meter is equal to service to one equivalent residential connection or "ERC". Service and meters larger than 5/8 inch are sized as their volume ratio to the 5/8 inch meter or ERC. TABLE II OFF-SITE FACILITIES FEE Effective Dates Types of Service 7 1 91 7 1 92 7 1 93 7 1 94 7 1 95 Single-family (per dwelling unit) $2,210 $2,320 $2,440 $2,560 $2,690 Multi-family 440 2,560 2,690 (per dwelling unit) 2,210 2,320 2, 4 '~" ..~ Motel and Hotel 1 105 1,160 1,220 1,280 1,345 (per bed) Hospital 210 2 2,320 2,440 560 2,690 2, (Per bed) , Other residential institutions (including nursing homes) 325 1 390 1, 1,465 1,535 1,615 (per bed) , All other businesses, industrial and public buildings will be based on meter size as follows: TA BLE III Meter Size 7 1 91 Effective Date 7 1 92 7 1 93 s 7 1 94 7 1 95 Inches 5/8 in. 2,210 $ $ 2,320 341 $ 2,440 514 3 $ 2,560 3,686 $ 2,690 3,874 3/4 in. i 3,182 658 5 3, 5,939 , 6,246 6,554 6 886 , n. 1 1 1/2 in. , 12,730 13,363 57 14,054 986 24 17,746 26,214 15,494 27,546 2 in. i 22,630 918 50 23,7 53,453 , 56,218 58,982 61,978 n. 3 4 in. , 90,522 95,027 11 99,942 870 224 104,858 235,930 110,186 247,910 6 in. i 203,674 086 362 213,8 380,109 , 399,770 419,430 440,730 n. 8 10 in. , 565,760 593,920 45 624,640 482 899 655,360 943,718 688,640 991,642 12 in. 814,694 855,2 , (7) Miscellaneous Charges. The following charg es for service to customers, other than sale of water s foll ows•e a a. Re-check reading of meter $10 (No charge if original reading was in error) b. Investigation/verification of leakage in $20 customer's line c. Meter accuracy test $25 (No charge if meter fails accuracy test) d. Round trip for meter turn-off, turn-on for $25 non-payment e. Reset meter if pulled due to non-payment $25 5 ~; ~ . f. Special request to discontine or turn-on $10 service for other than non-payment g. Temporary construction meter $100 ($50 charge plus $50 deposit) 2. That the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Article are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance shall remain valid. 3. That the provisions of this ordinance and the rates established hereby shall be effective from and after July 1, 1991. 6 ~ 9 ~_`3 TRANSITION PROVISIONS If a concept plan or site plan is submitted to and accepted by the County on or before 3 : 00 p.m. , July 1, 1991, and final plan approval occurs on or before June 30, 1992, then the person submitting this plan shall pay at the time of issuance of building permit or recordation of plat twenty-five (25%) percent of the connection fee in effect on June 30, 1991. Seventy-five (75%) percent (balance) of this connection fee may be paid on or before June 30, 1992; after June 30, 1992, seventy-five (75%) percent of the connection fee in effect at that time must be paid. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MHELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEp,DMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance to Increase Water Rates and Water Connection Fees for a Five-Year Period beginning with Fiscal Year 1991- 92 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ . '~ ;~ Gam. BACKGROUND' In 1983, the Roanoke Valley local governments sale 1 e forrthe Hollow as the best and most economical new water supp y Valley. Spring Hollow, along with improvements to Roanoke City's water system and treatment plant and the would provide water to the facilities and plants in Roanoke County, region for the next 50 years. roceeded with all design and permitting Roanoke County p requirements. Roanoke City and Salem have since decided their future water demands will not exceed their existing capacities and, therefore, will not astnuelwithnplanned improvementsrtoutheir However, each will con existing systems. The du tlicate the CountyPsaeffortspg The City existing system does not p ~ to serve water im rovements will extend the City s capability P through the year 2010. Roanoki C will be need d by the yeare2010em that an additional water supp y The first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991. SUNIl~IARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County andde 1 Valrloe~heed SpringdHollowl isa thesbesty to continue planned or Y g most economical solution to the problem. Delays in construction will result in continued poor quality and undependable sources of water along with increasing costs far beyond the current estimates. ~r- The cost of this project is estimated to be $72,177,000. In order to fund this construction, the County will issue $15,000,000 General Obligation Bonds and approximately $57,177,000 in Water Revenue Bonds. The deb enses incurrede by this sy tem bwill needtto increased operating exp be funded from a combination of increases in water rates an increases in water co rst 5ecur ties, Inche have worked w th the McDonnell and Wheat, F County staff to determine tbreakdowncbetweenewaterorate increases these bonds as well as the and connection fee increases. In order to make these bonds more attractive to bond insurers and bond buyers, the County should commit to a five year program of scheduled water rate and connection fee increases. These increases will assure tsuffoicientytosretireothisnn wedebthatThis revenue source will be five year commitment is necessary to meet the bTheseonewaratestand that are needed to obtain a good bond rating. fees are outlined in the 991 ached ordinance. These rates will become effective July 1, 1 FISCAL IMPACT• This ordinance will provide the additional water revenues needed to retire debt ufficient revenueso to cover the nincreased as well as provide s operating expenses as a result of the new water system. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that after the public hearing, the Board approve the attached ordinance, and proceed with the preparation for the bond sale. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ ~, ~ ~ y12-t / ~~rf~.~{/4 A k~ [~.~, ~ Diane D. Hyat Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ---------------- ------------------------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers ~-. ~~.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THTUESD~AY,R JUNEU25~, gD91 NISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE 62591-7 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, RATES AND FEES OF CHAPTER 22, WATER BY PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PROCEDURES, FOR NNECT ONSFEES,WANDRFORRCERTA NTEFFECTIVE DATESEASE IN CO WHEREAS, by Ordinance 62486-147 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted and established water user rates for Roanoke County utility customers; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.1-292.2 and 15.1-875 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the establishment of rates and charges for water service; and WHEREAS, the first reading for this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing for this ordinance was~held on June 25, 1991, after publication and notice as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 22-82, Rates and fees of Chapter 22, Water of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 22-82 Rates and fees. (a) Water service rates. The followinct rates and charges as established by the board of supervisors for water service shall apply where water service is provided by the county: The volume charge per 1000 gallons will be based on water used T . The volume charge is added to the base charge 1 .- ~~ to determine the total water ~:~ ____=r bill. WATER RATES - Effective Dates Base Charge 1000 gallon 7~ 1 7/1/92 7/1/93 7/1/94 7/1f 95 per mont h 0 - 10 $ 9.46 $ 10.41 $ 11.45 $ 12.60 90 18 $ 13.86 20.79 11 - 14 14.20 15.62 04 26 17.18 28.64 . 31.50 34.65 15 - 17 23.67 27 39 . 43.20 47.52 52.27 57.50 18 - 28 . 89 54 60.38 66.42 73.06 80.37 29 - 39 . 71 75 83.28 91.61 100.77 110.85 40 - 54 . 47 97 107.22 117.94 129.73 142.70 55 - 69 . 57 157 173.33 190.66 209.73 230.70 70 - 111 . 66 217 239.43 263.37 289.71 318.68 112 - 153 . 58 298 328.44 361.28 397.41 437.15 154 - 210 . 49 379 417.44 459.18 505.10 555.61 211 - 267 . 06 625 687.57 756.33 831.96 915.16 268 - 440 . 64 870 957.70 1,053.47 1,158.82 1,274.70 441 - 613 . 211.33 1 1,332.46 1,465.71 1,612.28 1,773.51 614 - 853 , 552.01 1 1,707.21 1,877.93 2,065.72 2,272.29 854 - 1093 , 987.34 1 2,186.07 2,404.68 2,645.15 2,909.67 1094 - 1400 , 422.66 2 2,664.93 2,931.42 3,224.56 3,547.02 1401 - 1707 , 962.08 2 3,258.29 3,584.12 3,942.53 4,336.78 1708 - 2087 , 501.50 3 3,851.65 4,236.82 4,660.50 5,126.55 2088 - 2467 , $1.40 $1.54 $1.69 $1.86 $2.05 Volume charge (b) Connection fees. (1) Generally. The total water connection fee shall consist of costs and considerations associated with (a) a basic connection fee; (b) off-site facilities fee; (c) off-site and oversized main credit policy. c. O,~`=site and oversized main credit policy. Credits will be allowed against the off-site facilities fee for off-site extension in excess of three hundred (300) feet and/or line size in excess of minimum size required by the county. For any off-site extensions, on a public right-of-way or easement adjacent to owners' (applicant) property, credit will be allowed against the off-site facilities fee only for line size in excess of the minimum diameter required by the county. No credit will be allowed where a main size greater than minimum size in diameter is required to adequately 2 serve the owner (applicant). Credits will be limited ~-~~£ one-fourth the amount to a maximum of ~~ assessed for the off-site facilities fee and are sub'ect to funds bein available for credits within the water off-site facilities fees fund. Credits will be computed based on recent bids taken for construction of similar water facilities. Installation of a well and/or storage facilities in excess of sixty thousand (60, 000) gallons to provide a water source, and pumpage required to supply the storage facility where County facilities are not available, are considered off-site facilities for purposes of this paragraph. e. The total connection fee Twenty-five (25~) percent seventy-five (75~) percent shall be paid as follows: at time of plan approval, ~ • ~ ~ ~ 7 V ~, facility. When the o==-sic 1Q~11y~~v- _-- increased, the applicant may pay the remaininct seventy- five (75%) percent of the rior fee within one 1 ear after the effective date of the new fee. Thereafter the remainin sevent -five 75~ ercent shall be calculated on the fee that exists at the time the balance is paid. ( 5 ) Fire Service. Al l separate f ire services shal l be properly metered and protected against backflow with a check valve. The meter vault, meter and backflow device shall be furnished and installed by the county. The total connection fee for separate fire service connections will be equal to the basic connection portion of the connection fee plus the off-site facilities fee a~ established for the size fire service requested. The se arate fire service fee is as follows: SEPARATE FIRE SERVICE FEE Fire Service Line Basic nnection C Off-Site Facilities Total Size (Inches) o 2 $ 2,600 $ 2,122 $ 4,722 574 8 3 3,800 4,774 487 8 , 12,987 4 4,500 600 7 , 19,096 26,696 6 g , 10,500 33,948 44,448 10 12,500 53,043 382 76 65,543 91,382 12 15,000 , 3 The Utilit DirecLOr ma ~~uu~~ ~--~ ---- for fire service when the fire service meter is laced in the same vault as the domestic service. ( 6 ) Schedule of Connection fees. _ Theme Total ~ ^°~ries d term ned by meter 51Ze 1115 Lne vii-J1~~ ~~~~-~----- - bv meter size type of service, and effective date). as indicated in Tables I II & III. TABLE I BASIC CONNECTION FEE Basic Meter Size ERC Connection Inches $ 1.00 $ 500 5/8 in. 1.44 525 3/4 in. 2.56 700 1 in. 5.76 1,800 1 1/2 in. 10.24 2,600 2 in. 23.04 3,800 3 in. 40.96 4,500 4 in. 92.16 7,600 6 in. 163.84 10,500 8 in. 256.00 12,500 10 in. 368.64 15,000 12 in. The 5/8 inch meter is equal to service to one equivalent residential connection or "ERC". Service and meters larger than 5/8 inch are sized as their volume ratio to the 5/8 inch meter or ERC. TABLE II OFF-SITE FACILITIES FEE Effective Dates Tynes of Service 7 1 91 7 1 92 7 1 93 7 1 94 7 1 95 Single-family (per dwelling unit) $2,210 $2,320 $2,440 $2,560 $2,690 Multi-family 560 2,690 (per dwelling unit) 2,210 2,320 2,440 2, Motel and Hotel (per bed) 1,105 1,160 1,220 1,280 1,345 4 Hospital (Per bed) 2,210 2,320 2,440 2,560 2,69 Other residential institutions (including nursing homes) 465 1,535 1,615 (per bed) 1,325 1,390 1, All other businesses, industrial and public buildings will be based on meter size as follows: TABLE III Meter Size Effective Date 91 7 1 92 7 1 93 s 7 1 94 7 1 95 Inches 7 1 5/8 in. $ 2,210 $ 2,320 $ 2,440 14 $ 2,560. $ 686 3 2,690 3,874 3/4 in. 3,182 3,341 3,5 939 6,246 658 5 , 6,554 6,886 1 in. 1 1/2 in. , 5, 12,730 13,363 14,054 86 17,746 214 26 15,494 27,546 2 in. 22,630 23,757 24,9 918 53,453 56,218 50 , 58,982 61,978 3 in. 4 in. , 90,522 95,027 99,942 70 104,858 930 235 110,186 247,910 6 in. i 203,674 213,811 224,8 086 380,109 399,770 362 , 419,430 440,730 n. 8 10 in. , 565,760 593,920 624,640 82 655,360 718 943 688,640 991,642 12 in. 814,694 855,245 899,4 , (7) Miscellaneous Charges. The following -- charctes for service to ~~g b e shall customers, other than sale of water follows• as a. Re-check reading of meter if original reading was in error) $10 (No charge b. Investigation/verification of leakage in $20 customer's line c. Meter accuracy test (No charge if meter fails accuracy te st) $25 d. Round trip for meter turn-off, turn-on for $25 non-payment e. Reset meter if pulled due to non-payment $25 f. Special request to discontine or turn-on $10 service for other than non-payment 5 g, Temporary construction meter $100 ($50 charge plus $50 deposit) 2. That the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Article are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance shall remain valid. 3. That the provisions of this ordinance and the rates established hereby shall be effective from and after July 1, 1991. TRANSITION PROVISIONS If a concept plan or site plan is submitted to and accepted by the County on or before 3:00 p.m., July 1, 1991, and final plan approval occurs on or before June 30, 1992, then the person submitting this plan shall pay at the time of issuance of building permit or recordation of plat twenty-five (25~) percent of the connection fee in effect on June 30, 1991. Seventy-five (75~) percent (balance) of this connection fee may be paid on or before June 30, 1992; after June 30, 1992, seventy- five (75%) percent of the connection fee in effect at that time must be paid. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance with transition provision included in ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 6 cc: A COPY TESTE: Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Clifford Craig, Director, Utility R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart County Attorney Paul Mahoney Magistrate Main Library Police Department Roanoke Law Library, Roanoke County Code Sheriff's Office 315 Church Avenue, 5.W., Rke 24016 Book 7 ,~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THTUESDAAY,X JUNE r25, Ai 9I1 ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE 62591-6 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-3, IITILITY SERVICE TAX OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION BY PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN RATES FORD THIS ETAX CE~DFFOR~ANE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOFS SUBJECT T WHEREAS, by Ordinance 85-179 adopted on October 8, 1985, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, levied a consumer utility service tax on purchases of certain utility services within the County; and WHEREAS, Article 4 of Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the imposition of such a tax; and WHEREAS, Section 2.02 of the Roanoke County Charter authorizes a consumer utility tax on certain public utility services at a rate or rates not exceeding those authorized by general law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing for this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991, after publication and notice as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 21-3, Utility service tax of Chapter 21, Taxation of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: 1 Sec. 21-3. Utility service tax. (a) There is hereby imposed and levied by the county, upon urchaser of a utility service '"`'"' r each and every p ~ a tax in the amount of -~-~ ~ -~ twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser with respect to each utility service; which tax, in every case, shall be collected by the seller from the purchaser and shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller for the use of the county at the time that the purchase price or such charge shall become due and payable under the agreement between the purchaser and the seller; provided, however, that the tax hereinabove imposed shall not be deemed to apply to that part of the charge in excess of fifteen (15) dollars per month made by any seller of any utility service to any purchaser thereof who uses such utility service in private homes or residential units; provided, further, that any commercial or industrial user shall pay the hereinabove set out ~ ~t twelve (12) percent on the first five thousand (5,000) ~ {r• dollars of utility service. (g) The tax imposed in subsection (a) of this section is hereby imposed and levied and -•~ within the shall apply to the purchase of bottled gas county for cooking, heating, gas refrigeration, and lighting, h~ 2 at the rate of ~_~"'-'" twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser with respect to such commodity. (j) The following words and phrases when used in this section shall, for the purposes of this section, have the following respective meanings, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. (iv) Utility service. The phrase "utility service" shall include local exchange telephone service of corporations falling within the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 38, Title 58.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, water service and electricity service and gas service of corporations falling within the provisi- ons of Article 4, Chapter 38, Title 58.1 of the aforesaid Code of Virginia, furnished in the county. 2. That the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Article are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance shall remain valid. 3 , This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after September 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw 3 NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~/ ~~_,~~ Mary H. A en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart County Attorney Paul Mahoney Magistrate Main Library Police Department Roanoke Law Library, Roanoke County Code Sheriff's Office 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Book 4 ACTION NO. /,, ITEM NUMBER w 7~ - AT A REGULAR MEETINGATOTHEHROANO E COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance to Increase Utility Service Tax and to Add Water Service as a Taxable Utility Service. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Board of Supervisors has determine the aCounty,ra t is provide for the long-term water needs of treatment plant and necessary to construct the water reservoir, Hollow distribution and star c stf of lthiss projecta is hestimated to be Water Project. Th the County will $72,177,000. In orde eYtralunobligations bonds o and approximately issue $15 million g $57,177,000 in water re Will beo funded from the general fundtof general obligation bonds the County. The first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991. SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION An increase in the consumer utility service tax will generate sufficient revenue to reot ds thatdwillsbe lissued tfor $themSpring in general obligation b utilit service tax is charged Hollow Water Project. Currently, Y on local exchange telephone service, electric service and gas service. There is a cap for residential service theme m nth s tThe tax does not apply to expenses in excess of $15 p attached ordinance would increase this tax service ~ There will include water service as a taxable utility continue to be a $15 cap as the maximum amount of monthly expense that this tax could be applied against for residential users. The maximum utility consumer tax that is allowable by the State of Virginia is 20~. The increase proposed on the attached ¢r ordinance would equalize our utility service tax with that of the City of Roanoke. Because of refinements the staff has been able to ents on the bond amortization, we may be able to cover the debi n~the utility $15 million general obligation bonds without app y g consumer tax against the water bills. The proposed ordinance includes water as a taxable utility, however if the Board wishes to remove this provision there will probably still be sufficient funds to cover debt service. Any revenues collected in excess of debt service would be available for other general fund capital needs. These rates will bec ~ thi f tax vto the eCounty~must receive companies required to remi notice by certified mail 60 days prior to the effective date of the tax. FISCAL IMPACT' This ordinance will provide the additiona15 emillion egeneral retire the debt service on the proposed $ obligation bonds to be issued for the Spring Hollow Water Project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that after the public hearing the Board approve the attached ordinance, and proceed with the preparation for the bond sale. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- ------------------- VOTE ---------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers ~~~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T TUESDAY R JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-3, UTILITY SERVICE TAX OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION BY PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR SUCH SERVICES, FOR AN EXPANSION OF THE SERVICES SUBJECT TO THIS TAX, AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF WHEREAS, by Ordinance 85-179 adopted on October 8, 1985, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, levied a consumer utility service tax on purchases of certain utility services within the County; and WHEREAS, Article 4 of Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the imposition of such a tax; and WHEREAS, Section 2.02 of the Roanoke County Charter authorizes a consumer utility tax on certain public utility services at a rate or rates not exceeding those authorized by general law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing for this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991, after publication and notice as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That Section 21-3, Utility service tax of Chapter 21, Taxation of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: 1 ~~-~ Sec. 21-3. Utility service tax. (a) There is hereby imposed and levied by the county, upon urchaser of a utility service }'' r"""' ~~ each and every p _ „} a tax in the amount of twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser with respect to each utility service; which tax, in every case, shall be collected by the seller from the purchaser and shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller for the use of the county at the time that the purchase price or such charge shall become due and payable under the agreement between the purchaser and the seller; provided, however, that the tax hereinabove imposed shall not be deemed to apply to that part of the charge in excess of fifteen (15) dollars per month made by any seller of any utility service to any purchaser thereof who uses such utility service in private homes or residential units; provided, further, that any commercial or industrial user shall pay the hereinabove set out sr-i~ ~t twelve (12) percent on the first five thousand (5,000) } ~ . 1, L, a dollars of utility service. }~~=«u (g) `' } }+~~ a }The tax imposed ~ ..~.-, y~ 7.. -- - in subsection (a) of this section is hereby imposed and levied and to the purchase of bottled gas ~ •^"'~ within the shall apply county for cooking, heating, gas refrigeration, and lighting, 2 f ~"" "^ at the rate of ~ ~~=t twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser with respect to such commodity. (j ) The following words and phrases when used in this section shall, for the purposes of this section, have the following respective meanings, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. (iv) Utility service. The phrase "utility service" shall include local exchange telephone service of corporations falling within the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 38, Title 58.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, water service and electricity service and gas service of corporations falling within the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 38, Title 58.1 of the aforesaid Code of Virginia, furnished in the county. 2. That the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Article are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance shall remain valid. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after September 1, 1991. 3 Burns 8~ McDonnell County of Roanoke, Virginia WATER RATE and FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY in support of the SPRING HOLLOW WATER PROJECT 'c .~ ai Y O C rd O O T C O U a O W U P~ Q 3 w ~a x x c~ w A w F U .a a 0 .z 0 w 0 v T u .~ s u °a U ~. W Y. N b pC G X «`Q ~ ~ ~ ~~. a g a `o_ 'a C QQ 75 ~ ~ O ~ ~ I N ~ Cam. 'n ~ N O M O ~ ~ O ~ 2FCj~ N M ~ 71 ,{, ~ N N I C 2 y, N •C1 N Y A }. ~ C_ O W LL C _ (d ~A O O b g, Nni p 7 0 ~ O O T ~~ o~0 h N~ T N N O M O o0 00 C ~` p~p~~ N N`~.~ N N '~ M ~ C C O O~ N U ~ (A m c N O. fi N ~ po O~ N .~• V1 N 'C V1 ao O~ O vM1 iT O ~ r M . n t ~ n ~p O `n .+ ci O Ni O [~ t~ 1. O. y ^ I ~ ~„~ N N N N O M~ ~ ~ b Q. N~ ~ h ~ [[~~ T S ~ T N N~ y~ <I D N O M O ~ j ~ N ~ N ti N N ~' Q ~p ~ ~ O b b V N 00 N ~ U N ~ N O M a b O O~ (~ V' O O N~ ~ v ~ ~ I ~ . pp O~ N N O N O C'~' ~~Qjj O p i y D, ~ v1 O. a o r ~ N h [~ N of N I~ G ~G a~ ~ ~ i N~ ~ O cn O ~ ~ pp CV N p i S N 1~ O L ^ O M V1 M b~ Q N ~ ~+` M j M U [ ~ ~ M ~ ~ O ~ ~ N ~ ti ~ Q~ N O M ~D i ~O 1 F~ 1 p . ~ O O .-~ N N M ~ ~.~ W O a o ~...{ Yom) ~ ~ M M pp O M O. I h .~. h ~ N < G~ Nri 1 O i O ~G b [~] '~ p, ~ O a ~ ~ N ~ M ~ (V O r ~ ~ ^ ~ Q. N "' r 00 W ~ i ~ W V W ^~ ~ 4 a M O O M M O '^ (~ ~p T O h~ 0 P N ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h l ~ ~ N V N ~~ N O M i z .~ ~ ~ o W ~= ~ ~ T _ ~ 'y ~ F T Q 0. ~ T p I S U U .~ ^ ' OQ~~ v ~ Q ~~pp ~ N~ ~ ~ 7 6. N ~ M 7 1 ~ '~ i '~ W p C ~ N o O. j ~~ N N V O ~ ~ N O R F~ ~ O ~ > F-1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .O U a,~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ W ~ E o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ao a~0 N O v i v M ~ M ono ~ V p ~ ~ O G E h r r~ 00 V1 h `~ + N .r R d' ~ N O M V1 ~ ~ .f'!. ~'. R ' ?: 3 ~ V1 ~O M h ~ ~ [\ 7 O C O Op. ee O~ a ao -~ ~ Cy ~C O ~.. ~ ~ U W ~ v o U U ~ ~ y ~ °; °; Q o ~•~~ W~ "" N b I tH~ M M N~ b ~ V~ OD N O N O M ~ ~ ~ V1 ~ 'n ~ b a ~ W. 'y 4: 7 O O e 0 I V~ M ~ u ~ H 0 00 .bi [~ ~ ~"~ I N ~ O ~ ~ ~ L T ti . .-O+ v I ~ ~ O y 7 ~ ~'~" O ^ 0. T q ~ ~ ~ q 6 '. v ~ n T A' Q U~ o n . 'J w ~ w C t uOv. 1-' .y,,i v o ~ ~ ~ ~_°. .°• .d m 3~ 3 u N .C .~ Y O c c~ O O _T C 7 O U g O~ pp,, (h~ pO~~ pp M.M M MM N ~.N vNi h-~ O U h ~ N N h ~O ~ 'C N ae ~ oo v~ o M N t~+f `D N . i o o f O h oN} M.~ oo M. vMi M N N ~ O~ ~ ~ fi h R ~ ~ a O I OT, O~ Vf . . . -~ . n N R. ` O ^. .. y .r N N M d' V~ ~O .r H O H O ~ p p p ~7 p ~y e~ n N ~ • ~+ ~ ~ n b ~ h .. v'^i r ~D ~.. oho M N T ~.~ M ~ T be ~ pM~ O ~ O' N f`? . Om ` N . . . . p ~ p p V ~ y 8 { ~ p III H N ~T. b a N ~ N ~. ~ ` ~ `D 7 ti O M .r .~{ ~ t . b , ~ . . D O 4 N N.M 7'n V1 h ~ O O . H ~ ` ` °° g v °° vcvo ~ D ~ vhi T a ~ a o"o, o~ o"a a ~ u a4 ~^ a~oo :°. ~ rn . ~ ~ „ ~ N N , i ~n M oo ~} a: M oo ~o 00 oo eo M oo h ~o vi N M `D Op. N ~ ;Q rr ppN~~ M .ONO ~ H N ~. ~ :Q ~ H U ~'1 N~ ri ~ ~o Vl .~.~ ~ .-+ N M M V `n ~ ~ ~ H ~ p, ~7 (~ pO (~ oo v~[~ ~ N of v~ ~.~ ~ ~ `O N ~ O ~ a «~r. N N ~ 6D M Q~ O D2 ~ h o. O ~ 7 h T H rr ~Op~ U M oho ~ O h `n ~ ~ N M ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ M ~~.~ O~0 t V i N .+ N M M'. 7 Vl ~ ~ „~ ~ o~ ~ o M ~ o o ~ ~ ~o ~O g ~, ~ ~ o> °h° ~ De ~ o0 O O~ ~ i° ~ , 0 ~ p p Nef ~ r N O~ iA M .N.+ H N ~h'i OD. ~ i ~ M ~ ^' N O , , Op; . V i O~ .+ r. N N M R v1 ^ y M ~ Vf - O o .-, ~p oo N v~ ~p M p r r ~ h ~ ~ Q~ 00 N h .. N... ~ X71 V'~ N O O 8f ~ t~ vii O [0r0 ~ V1 O~ QC, Q+ p' ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ N p p~ 0~ !~ V7 .-. a0 N-y Vp1 V~ V app .-. M v'i ~ O N O N . O ~ CNV O~ ~D h M M T h `D ~ H N O c j y .i O O i ~A o c cif i F"'1 b `, . M 7. .-; N N K M M h~ U ~ O~/ h+l ~ { O. _ h o~ y N N. ^' 7 ~ 4i1 N ,~.~.. M R I~ P ~D C'.. .N. ONp. ~D P ~D ~n ~ ~ 0 00 O~ O h ~ ~ ~ ^ 1+~ I Q J t OIL ~ . y ~~pp ~ O M .--~ O~ ~O M v1 (ham ep~ e.~ .h-~ N 7 `D O~ Q` ~ N d0 d O ~ Nh-. V W M r N M d h 0 7 y. ~ N N M ~f ; "' x ~ ~ [I] w] ~h V M ~ p ~ .Np ¢ ~ t~~l N N M ~ ~ ~... h't t~ ~ N O a ~ ~ v Se O [M~ -+ O yyy p b (h z Y~ ~ 0. ~. ~ M 0. M [^ M O. N ti W Vhj M ~ YV~. ~ V1 N 7 ~~DD oD O h~ ~ VVVO00 N 00 ap h 7 l N V ~ V ~` ~.9 . . M~ ~D O~ M [ H M M' N N 00 00 ^ N ~ . ~ i i9 W ~ A ~ w W //~~ ~~ I"°i1 ~ ~4/ 1 p _ ~p O h [~ 0~.. .. h t~ oo A M ~ °O . O ~.. d~: N `D N OO h ~ v~ ~D v~ 7. O ~D M O M~ 8~ M 00 7 O M °~ N V O Fal B v~ ti ~ 7 M O~ vt hh [~ ~ 00 6~ N (G~ "'i VN'~ ohO N iD o H ~ N M ~ h O~~. N P M. ~ 00 N a!1 O~ Q U ~? M ~ ~ v1 ~n "' ~ ~ T .. N N M y N H ~ a ~ pp.. ~~pp °o OO N t+~ .h, ~ O O. N ~ ~ v1. M. ~ C~ O h O~ O ~O N ~O ^'~ M ~ [~ O~ N 'lT ~ ~ H N 'd vl h `D N N 7 a~0 ~ C Oh; v1 O N ~ ~ V1 pNp pip ~ ~ TTT -~ .ti ^. ri N N '. M j OOO ~ Vi ~~II ~1 a 3 O g p. ~p p c.~ _ ~.7 ~p r N -' ~ O P... N ~ ~ V~ ~ O.. D ON VNi vM1 O ~ ~ 0 ~ O p a •p ~ ~ ao O w 7 p ( ~ r V ~ ~ ~ r ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ N N 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ oo 9 . . .. 0 0 . .. N N. M d. ~y~yp/f :.. g OO~~ ~~pp p c~ ~O [~ N .. ~ O ~ N ~ ~ V~ ~ ~.. N O ~ v1 O `D O ~ O p O DD ti o p p v~ ~ iL ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ .hr ~ ~ N ~ `D N a0 ~O [G~ N v~j ~ ~. .. oO "'i.. ~ ~ Vt op ~ M o0 ~ ~ p . ~ N N 'S . N N h M ~ ^' ~ . . I N y Q _ _ _ ...:. _.. .n .n '.o .a iY w 1F rR LQ flC 3'R :. c O a C .~ C LL O 2 0 .~ C m W c m t0 3 .~ .~ ai Y O c co O 0 c 0 U r~r t'~ U O a ~ ~ w w O z 0 z A4 3 w H a~ x a c~ z c~ a w H W Q U ~. F 'S ~ ~ u •^ a '3 w ~v g w _w N ~ Vi 0 O ~,? O w U ~w w f~ C .~ N Y 0 C O O C O U O xo ~ U ~ A W ~ W w F W Q U Q M v1 ~ n{ N N O O~ 1lp'1 p^. ~~ ~ O O O D 1 O O e a ~ `O ~ O~ l ~ O~ a 0 O `O O~ 0 O D U ~ 1 i C 00 7N O ~ O O ~M~}} ~ M pp O ~ M O t ~ ~~f i O l~ ~ M N s.9 ~ 1 a0 ~ O' V yy ~ s9 % v H A v ~ r ~ H ... . _. f i v i Vi ~ p p M [0[~0~ ~ I ~ M O O ~ O O O I N O. 0 N ~ 0 ~ O V1 T I O~ ~ ~ ~ M of b ~ N oo ~ ~ ~ rf R ~ ~ ' p o f9 ~ ~ v ~ ' ..i :A H .... ~ v v y ' H y ~ H ~ ~ N V~1 M VV 11 O O ~ 00 ~ a g O O B O O O 1 Q~ ~p ~p 8 ~D V~ V1 ~ M ~ O ~D 1 M M e'i M O~ M O~ SV M M pN oN ~O O H 00 ~D l M ~ ~ ~ y y ~ to ~/1 ~O A i9 O ~ ~ ~ v v H y v ~ V! i A ~ to N ~yyO ~O O O Q ~o pNp ~aO ao ~ g O ~ O ~ v 1 O O 1 T N o0 j O~ O r 7 ~ T O i^ v ; o ~ ~ pp Ni ~ T .-r ( ~ b [~ N T o f v~ p M ~ ~ `~ A~ ( SZ pyNp H ``eq ~ 00 ~ M 00 .-~ N O MV! VT y ~ ~pp K `~' , v y i9 ~q Vi ~-' H i9 H C. a N ~ ^" O O~ ~ ,~~~i ~ ~ O O B O O O i ~ ~ ~ I w M M a O M C a ~ M ~ .+ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ pp ' O~ r+ MMr .Mi ~ ti M M L` . N iIf .n H ~ v ..+ .i ~ v . ~ ir9 ~ ~ ]( ~~ O 0 0 ~ ~ l~ O N O O O~ b O O 1 O ~ i ~ 7 ~ p. 0 ~ O ~ y ~ N M ~ ~ ~ O p71 h O N ~ a W h M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r V9 a ~ t` ~ iH ... M f9 te '' 69 H H v ~} ~ n a. l~ O O 8 ~~i o~0 7 ~i 8 0 O~ g O O N o o o_ o O b O ~D l ~ M O p O" 00 V~ 0o O o p p N O. OM. p ,~ N M 7 0 Q. me. ~ N O N ~ C• [~ t o N~ ~p ~ 00 H ~A O O ~ M [~ I~ H fy ~ ~ ' f.9 ~ t/ ~ ~ 4f H ~'' . .. ~ r r v iN9 . .. a g o ~ $ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ c ~ ~ 825 ° c~ ~ 5 25 25 2 1 o 25 ~ N ~ q . O O O ~ ` " ~ M ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Dp S ~ °~ O M ~ v `Q M a`() ~ , I N oD ~ v T H H v id) ~ M H v M M H 49 `"' 49 v ~ ~ ~ ~pp~ o ~ g ~ 8$ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N p ~ p ~ [Q M M O 00 ~ M ~ N ~ D N ~ l~ ~O M v M . 9 O . -i 4 ~ ~ .. + i/f N H `-' H H.. i9 O i M O O~ O O ~ I O O ~ ~ :~5 0` ~ 7 O O O ~ M O ^ v C~ ~' p 0 ~ O p ; 7 N ~ . b. ~ ~ y _ O 0. cA ..i s.9 y v ~ ~O ~ ~ p ~~{{ 88 v1 t~1 1 N I N M ~ .r~-i i 1 N ~ N v 1 j ~ a 0 0 O 0 7 O T O 7~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ op ~ 0o V o ~` 0~0 V1 7 0 d ~ `D H b h ( M O M Q ~p O `~ a o y ~ H ~• ~ H N . ~+ ~ M "' ih v Vi N H_. Q. U ~ ;~N.., ~+ : ~ 00 l~ ~ O~ ~p M pp. 8 pQ O, M P O l ~~ ~ .Ni O N .. Qp. 1 N I I^ I 1 1 ~ ~ Opp 1 I h ~ ~ 1 O O~ . ~ ~ v~ ~O ev o ~p p ~1 ~ ~O ~ O f o0 Q. ~ ~O ~ N N O. a ~ ~ a ~ ~ n O O v e.9 v e9 H-+ " ~ H 0 'c .~ ti Y O C O O T C 7 O U W H x w~ U O rJ W ~ ~ Cz7 ~ H ~ W A w w ~'' U W 3 d u .~ .~ N Y O C f~ O 0 _T C U a O O ~+.+ 1'N W I~ 3 w a~ x ,~ V W A W W Q U ff ~ D N ~ O ~O O . r (( ~~ ~ N ~ M N M ~p O .~ O . V T ~ N w ,a ~ O ~ N om ~' `O O ~O r N . Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OND .ri H ~ N ~ H a M V1 O ~ O ~ r o O I ~ O CT ?p~ v rN N O ~`~ O O N O H ~ y y ~ c9 OD O ao N N O h 7 r N 6 oMO N .~+ Grp ONO . ~ M N 00 .-~ ~ y ~ " y a N r W y 0~0 O O. ~ ~ ~ O ~ Off. ~ `O ~O M N b W ~ ~ i ~ ~1 O O t ~ i . ~ V i r W ~ ~ ~ ~ H ,~~~ 00 O Ca o0 N b O~ n -~. T r `D 7 O ~ ~p M N N ~ O st O O t+f 00 ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ;, ~ ~ O~ ~ O ~ N 7 ~ ~ D n pp ~ ~p N 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ao 7 N r~ W N a0 y ~ C y ~ ~ H a '. O~ M 7 aD O O~ M r r T ~ ~ ` D V ~O O O M " (Q nN ~ pO p ~~ ~ y ONO 01 pp ~O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N $ O 7 ~ ~ O gy M O~ b . . p , o p ti 8 V1 ONO (per. r M ~ V1 OND a ~ 49 V ~ ~ ~p H 9 G9 Vf i ~ a ~ i i i i . i 0. ~ i i Q ` U' ' ~: a F ~' ~ a ., ~ '' ~~~~a~3 6/25/91 Steve McGraw Mr. Tom Runions called and asked tonight's meeting. Said he was oppo and raising of the water rates. project before, they believed they project. Believes it should not be Salem, and Roanoke County. Brenda cc: Mr. Hodge Mary Allen Bob Johnson to express his opinion for sed to Spring Hollow Reservoir When the voters approved the were voting for a regional done unless by Roanoke City, 6/ 18/91 2:45 p.m. Mr. McGraw: Margie Runions called to say be at public meeting on June opposing the construction Reservoir. Brenda ';,~ .,, ,..,. ~._ ~ : ~ ~. k ~ - -~ that she and~her husband, Tom, cannot 25th but she wants to go on record as and financing of the Spring Hollow 6/24/91 Steve McGraw Mrs. Maxey called to say that she and her husband, James L. Maxey, Boxley Hills, wanted you to know that they are opposed to water rates going up. They are concerned about elderly people on fixed income. She said they would not be totally opposed to Spring Hollow Reservoir but wanted it to be financed cheaper so rates would not double. Brenda cc: Mr. Hodge f ~ ~; 6/24/91 Steve McGraw, Chairman Mr. Ron Blandy from the Boxley Hills neighborhood called and said he would like his views expressed at the meeting tonight. He thinks the Spring Hollow Project is good but is opposed to the amount of increase for the water rates. He would like to see the project phased in at a slower pace, a different method of funding, regional approach - whatever will help to lower the increase of water rates. He mentioned concerned for people on fixed income and people who are not getting a raise and not keeping up with inflation. Brenda cc: Mr. Hodge 7 ( 'ti - ~ ,~ ~p~.ve~ ~'~_ ,. 6/24/91 Mr. Hodge: Mr. Dave Murray, Past President of Boxley Hills Civic Club, called. As Past President, he is serving as liaison to the County for the club. He has been getting many calls and questions about raising water rates. He does plan to be at public hearing tomorrow. He suggested that perhaps you could send out a periodic report to civic groups to keep them informed so when they get questions they will have some information. He said enlisting civic groups in on- going things could help with support for projects, etc. He said some of the citizens calling seems to think that Mr. Eddy held district meetings to explain about Spring Hollow and wanted to know why Bob Johnson did not hold meetings. Told him that they probably meant the Reporter he sends out since the last two dealt with Spring Hollow. I told him I was unaware if Mr. Eddy's held any district meetings. I explained that Roanoke County Today's last two issues had a great deal of information about Spring Hollow and listed upcoming board actionsm etc. Said he did not get a copy in his paper. He said he would like to discuss this idea with you. Told him you might want to have Anne Marie as PIO call him. Brenda cc: Anne Marie ~r~~w~ ~ ~_ ~ ~, u. ~a~ ~~~+ ~-~~ _ `F- O~ FtOANq~.~ ti 'A p z ~ z °,~ ,. ' a .~ $ 150 , 988 ^~ SFSQUICEN7ENN~P ~ Beauri~ul8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: r '14-t-~ = - ) I ~~ ,~ ~. ~;~ ~ -I- , ~~~~ 1 ALI~AAIERIGLIT'f ~ ~~~~~ ~ ,~~ ~~~n~ ~ 1979 1989 MEMORANDUM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN AWBA ~~~ ~gSTRICT HARRY C. vINT'ON MAG IISTERUCIL~DISTR~T LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MALiI>>TERIAL DISTRICT Steve McGraw, Chairman EiOB L JOHNSON HowNS MAGISTERIAL DSSTRICT Fellow Board Members/ RICHARp W. BORERS /, ~ L-, CAVE SPRING AAAGIBiERIAL DISTRICT C. Nickens / ~' Harry ~~~'~~ June 24, 1991 SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT sincere apologies for not being with you this Please accept my standing takes me out of the state. evening. A commitment of long The need for additional wateokeehavecbeenochronicled fortmoredthan the Cities of Salem and Roan wells have come and gone, two-score years. During this time, ointed droughts and floods, elected officials children born and administrators, Viet Nam and Desert Storm, ears graduated from college (the same ones!). More tabout wensuring a have passed since the Valley starting talking basic governmental service -- water. There are those who continue to say let's study the issue further; da s and get Roanoke City and the City of Salem let s delay ninety y to join in; let's seriously look at all the alternatives. Fellow board members and citizens, the moment of truth is at hand. Now is the time for decisi he endlof•the rainbows I ffer myyfull issue in hopes of finding t endorsement to the Spring Hollow Reservoir Treatment and Distribution System. This weighty decision was not arrived and without considerable study, conversation with citizens, meditation. I am sensiin le heads of householdsr and t ose who citizens, those who are s g have not received a pay raisoewtReservoir and assoc ated syst mbis on the proposed Spring Holl a grave error. I can only in absentia tru ble vote in support f thesonl viable Board will result in a favora solution to the Valley's water needs that has evolved in more than twenty years. HCN/bjh CC: ElP~BOX-~9g0p ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2401'b-0798 (703) 772-2004 n O~ POANp~~ i t; A Z ~ 2 v a ~a ESO as SF`SQUICENTENN~P :1 Beauti~ul8egimm~Q COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: C~nunty of +~nannke MEMORANDUM ALL~AMERIG CITY '' I ~'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEcN A BA -A~c~isrERw ~ISrRIC'r HARRY C. N IICK~ M~ I~~ ~7R G LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HI115 M/~t"1STER~- D45TRICT Steve McGraw, Chairman Hou.INS~lsra~"~,~ Fellow Board Members R,cw,RD w. RoeERs (J 1.., CAVE SPRING MAGISTER~ DISTRICT ~! ~. Harry C . N ickens ~~/'~~ June 24, 1991 SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT ologies for not being with you this Please accept my sincere aP takes me out of the state. evening. A commitment of long standing and for The need for additional waanokeehavecbeenochronicled fortmore oven the Cities of Salem and Ro this time, wells have come and g two-score years. During officials and appointed droughts and floods, elected children born and administrators, Viet Nam and Desert Storm, ears graduated from college (the same ones!). More tabout ensuring a have passed since the Valley starting talking overnmental service -- water. basic g There are those who continue to say let's study the issue further; et Roanoke City and the City of Salem let's delay ninety days and g to join in; let's seriously look at all the alternatives. Fellow board members and citizens, the moment of truth is at hand. Now is the time for decisive action. No longer can we studyfull issue in hopes of finding the end of the rainbow- I offer my endorsement to the Spring Hollow Reservoir Treatment and stem. This weighty decision was not arrived and Distribution Sy conversation with citizens, without considerable study, meditation. I am sensitive to the needs of our and t osecwho those who are single heads of households, citizens, a raise this year. Yet not to act favorably have not received a p y Hollow Reservoir and associated system is on the proposed Spring a grave error. I can only in absentia trust that the collo~~ f thesonl v able Board will result in a fs v4o ter needs that has evolved in more than solution to the Valley twenty years. HCN/bjh CC : El~~ ~~~e8oo • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2401'b-079B • (703) 772"200'4 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~L APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~I -~' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may commentD. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AN ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as, an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time li orcet he r ule unlessuinstruct d lbyethe smajority of the issue, and will enf Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. uestions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Q ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE ~j~DUAL TO REPRESENT HEM, THE GROUP ALLOWING THE PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TI ~ ~l01 K AGENDA ITEM NO. la 9/- ~, APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCECITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~;~~~ ~ ~ ~ L~ C.~~:i ~,~'~~~0 v"~(~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~ ~- ~, L ~~ ~ c ~ ~ - ADDRESS ~ y'/tom ~~ t~~ ~ ~ ~" ~= ~ ~ ~ PHONE ~(~(v'~.~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~3 APPE CE REQUEST FOR ~/ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE C ITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~.~~ i~ - ~ ~.--t._~.:~~~.1 ,}~ ~ ~~` ~.~ ~~~ ~~. , I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADS.~ES.$.-_.F~..~.~.~F.I3.~~Q:~p. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. --- ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~ ~ ,1._ , , ~, ~; ,.~=' . R _ .. .. RESS ~.. t ~ ~~ ~~' r ~ ~ PHONE "`~ ~'~ _ ~ ~' ~ ~. I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~r/~. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR ;PUBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCE _CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: --~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~' r ~ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ PHONE i -- ~,~ ~.-- /~ s~ ~ .~ /~ ~.~ I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I111111~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE / CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: _ ~~ ~ -^ ,~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~--j"',,,,, ~, c_.. ~ k~,~ S~ ~ ADDRESS . 402 ~ c~J1;, ~~ °~ .~.e, t.a ..., ~_ ~ PHONE _ ~,~.~ _ ~~~~..~ "r---.-- II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~=3 APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCF,~ =CI'~IZENS COMME NTS SUBJECT: ~L~ ~': ~ / ~ C. i ;_- ~ ~ j( /~ ~ , ~% , ~' j_ '^ ~f 1, ~ , ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO.~ 9/ _~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR _PUBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCE _CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~.,. ~ ~-~~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~~~ ~ ~ ~ C~'tf Fits©,,,~, ~77~ ~yl~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I AGENDA ITEM NO. `y~' t ` APPE CE REQUEST FOR ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ =~ a f ~~~ f : ,, E ,.., ~~' ,,~ ,~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained 6y the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE .,~ ~~ ~~ ~', ~ , C' o c~ ~ i '~ -~ fE ~ ~ ~" ~, ,~ n 4 1 ~ .' ~s ~ `~a. (' Lrt,~'~_ ~~~ III111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 9/ -3 APPEARANCE REQU ~ ST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will 6e given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 4 ~' -'~ /APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR 1/UBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: IN~.~,~5~-}- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~f~ Its r~S ~R/~ vE' S 7 ~ y - ys--a -L I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 AGENDA ITEM NO. to ~1'l ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR UBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCE _CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: W A~~L~ ~I~IST~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME r ~ ADDRESS PHONE ~ c~,~/,~ 2 -~ ~~~ II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II11111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~, q/`..~, C~ ~~ j--~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~~~~ ~ ADDRESS G~ `~~O ~'~C~jy~,9~ y ,~ , PHONE _ ~D,~i~/C~i~~ ~Gc ' ~ ~Q~ I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111 ~~~~~~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~t~ C `~ 2 ~ j APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS A SUBJECT: .~k-~~vG ~ ; ~,% /_'? _ G~.v % v KL~.k''Cr I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE My NEE AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE S"~ ~~~ S -- lYc; i l ~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~'PE CE REQUEST FOR ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE `CITIZENS COMMENTS ~, , SUBJECT: ~.- ~~~ ,~ - ;' ,~~ ' - ,' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~ ~ ~~ ., ,~ ~:, s-~~ ~~ ~~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 9'~- °~ ~` 3 APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~I `Z ~ Z ,3 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME , ~ ~ S ~--~ ADDRESS ~f ~ ~- ~ ,~ .~' ,G, „/G C' c ~... PHONE 9 ~ ~ ~{ o ,-~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ j -~ a 3 APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS }~ ~ SUBJECT: , ~~ ~! ~'~., ~ ~ ~ 1 ~.-- ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS F'OR T'HE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUID;~LINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE AGENDA ITEM NO. ~9~ -~-~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR y -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~,G ~ ~ ~ ~ `~f ~- ? /~,li ~;. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE AGENDA ITEM NO. ,~~ ~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ,rx CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~. i,~ ~~~;~ ~_ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TIIE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~~-~r~ -~~--- ~~'E' CE RE VEST FORm ~~"~ ` ng Q PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT.. _ ' ~>~c~ ~_~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE k 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 nnnininniinininininiiniuuinunniniinnininii ~n ~ ~~I AGENDA ITEM N . APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR --~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: v~~~~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ r; !,. - ~ '~ ~1 ~fa~L~c~ ~ f ~~" I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE My NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~~ -j ~ ~~o ~ ~~~/ u,~~': III111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 11111111'lllllll~lllllllllllllllllililllllllllll 11111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~,~-~ ~'PE~RANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~ . 1 would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE My NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 7 Iilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillllilllillllll 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111,1111111111111111111111111111111111111~11,11111111111111111111111 ~/~ G-e h ~ i .s Gt s~ e:~--~2 ~n r ~-~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCECITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ..~;~, ~~% L-C~ W % ~ ~ ~ ~=~~' ah- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may commentD. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AN ADDRESS FOR 1'HE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the wimeenforcet he r ule unlessuinst uct d lbyethe smajoritgy of the issue, and Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. uestions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Q ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE ~ G THE IND D AL TO REPRESENT THEM, THE GROUP ALLOWIN PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~.~~ c ~c ~SSac. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ 9i- a, 3 1 June 20, 1991 WATER RESOURCES - A MORE VIABLE OPTION A REGIONAL APPROACH BY LOU ROSSIE A RETIRED WATER t^10RKS ENGINEER AND A DIRECTOR AND CO-CHAIR OF THE LEGISLATIVE C024P4ITTEE OF THE SOUTHWEST ROANOKE VALLEY CHAPTER OF AARP P7ith federal spending continuing to skyrocket, with taxes recently approved by congress beginning to be syphoned out of the mainstream of the economy, as interest rates go lower and lower and, thereby, reduce the income of millions of taxpayers who depend on income from their lifes savings, skyrocketing health care costs, caith municipalities like Bridgeport, Connecticut filing for bankruptcy, with the recession not expected to ease off until after this calendar year, with the serious state of the economy in our own commonwealth, with the local unemployment rate going higher and higher every month, with more and more companies in the Valley going out of business and with fewer and fewer businesses willing to move to Roanoke, ane wonders how much more homeowners and taxpayers can take. Surely, the federal, state and local governments are testing the breaking point which could explode anytime now, I suspect. H06-7 much more can taxpayers afford. 2 I believe it was ~^lill Rogers who said that of the two, one had less to fear from death because after death, at least, you no longer had to worry everytime Congress met. Perhaps P.oanoke County will not have to file for bankruptcy as did Bridgeport but with limited industry and a growth rate of less than 1~, this area may not be that far behind. There has to be a more cost effective ~~ay to meet the County's oaater needs for years to come and we believe there is. The 72 million dollar plus figure is too large an expense for a daily yield of 23 million gallons per day. With regional cooperation, expansion of consolidated treatment plant and distribution facilities and with regionally oriented water resources instead of ttao separate ones, the goals of more water availability at far less cost can be achieved. There needs to be more consideration by all due to valley location on drainage area and high cost of loc~a-yield fragmented sources. The need for two large 8-24 million-gallon--per-day plants is the same reasoning that gave us toao civic centers and currently might bring us another conference center. There sho?tld be more citizen input and evaluation. A more balanced regional proposal would appear to warrant more evaluation. 3 The best source from an overall regional development view and safe yield was pointed out in a 1967 regional report which I believe was approved by most valley governments as a workable caater resource plan. Ho;~rard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendorf Caere the consultants who made the study for the 5th Planning District. The plan represented a 40 million-gallon-per-day safe yield source which could be modified for pipe direction and phased treatment plant/distribution improvements easily. The Upper Craig Creek Dam Site in the 1969 report provided a source oahich r,culd be pumped 200 feet, plus or minus, in elevation and flaw by gravity down to the existing Catawba Creek intake and tunnel to Carvins Cove. A 5 mile, plus or minus, tunnel, similar to an existing one, would connect through Worth Mountain to the existing 6' 5" by 6' 2" tunnel structure. The pipe size and tunnel is the same as mentioned in the 1967 report when a 40 million- gallon-per-day safe yield was proposed with a 10 billion gallon storage capacity, as contrasted with Carvins Cove •~ahich has 20 million gallons per day safe yield. This caould provide 60 million gallons per day safe yield plus other existing sources (10 million). 4 The advantage of a pump/tunnel facility is that it could be used as needed at a 72 million-gallon-per-day rate, as proposed in the 1967 report. You merely expand Carvins Cove as needed with a shorter time schedule for construction. Additional sources for extreme long-range eater projection is also considered for future utilization. Some of these suggestions could be phased in, taking advantage of existing facilities and timing the costs more closely to need. It should eliminate county speculation with funds to project and work with developers to provide proper distribution system improvements in a phased manner. The large safe yield potential of good quality eaater should be of interest to all localities. Craig, Botetourt and Roanoke County, Salem and the City of Roanoke c~~ould benefit from a regional development of the source. This makes more sense than fragmented development of smaller sources more distant from the population center and operation cf t~ao treatment plants. Outsiders look at the area as Roanoke Valley and a new look needs to be presented to industry for future growth. Pater at high prices will drive industry out and divert nec~~ industry to other communities. The 1967 original Craig Creek Plan is also an option to consider, if Carvins Cove ex pansion could not be worked out. 5 Roanoke County should not take over private fragmented systems ~~hich do not meet EPA, state and local standards. Roanoke County should not promulgate private systems which cannot be econcmically self supporting. Roanoke County, years ago, bought larger systems with this goal in mind - to let new systems come to the more central system. A regional distribution system should contain plans for expansion and be controlled more at the site plan level for the future. Roanoke County in 1979-8D purchased a waste treatment plant that was not cost effective or finanr_ially ~°~ise. It required expensive upgrading when a plant Baas abandoned and a new pump station. built at considerable expense to the county taxpayers. Lets hope that a similar decision nova will be avoided with water supplies. The 1% growth in projected water needs seems extremely high as stated in County documents that are available. This data needs more verification. In the process, one needs to study the county's well production capacity ~-rhich also deserves more consideration. With the proposed high cost effect on current use, there would be less water used, resulting in less revenue, resulting in increased eater costs to the r_ustomers. This is similar to a drought scenario from a financial vi.e~~apoint. 6 Increased costs caill cause seniors on fixed incomes and lower income people to move out. This will have an even higher impact on the tax rate because of the reduced tax base. With a lack of job growth, many younger people will be forced to leave each year. t~~ith higher water rates, ne~~ industry will not consider Roanoke County. Couple that ~ait'z increased sewer rates which will probably follow, and lookout bankruptcy, here ~~~e come!! There should be more citizen input and a county vote on such a large investment of taxpayer funds before making a decision. County Supervisors need to hold local community hearings, give the p~~blic an opportunity to ask questions, ar.d evaluate alternatives, again, before making a decision. S^Ie need more valley cooperation or consolidation to hold doom the cost of government services. Water, and seoaerage and flood control facilities should be under one agency on a regional basis for all citizens of Roanoke Valley. Participation by all localities should reduce F.oanoke County's share in a joint project for more Valley water (4~ million gallons per day). This regional approach has worked well in Charlottesville/ Albemarle County where new industry and other development has been good over the past ten years. Roanoke County Supervisors should work towards such an agreement on a regional basis for the good of the entire Valley before going it alone at a higher cast per million gallons. I urge you to stop and take a look at this alternative. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTEPITION!!! \., ~. g ZZ~~°Z ~~ ~~~~ a JZpZ= a? KwZZ a \_ _i~o'~r ~3 aOOOv~. S~. ~'Zx ~~ l 'V ~ n n n o f ~W 3Z HO? z~ ~ W ° a'^ a Z Z o 0~ . W O~ = Z o 0 0 O ~ O Z Z ... r Y ~ ~Ow .. aww- io-LLO o B Z a p ~c~ o >o V o~'a^oLL z°~ ~LLao,a,~ = Z = i u d j -i7 a Oro V m° LL ° ~~ / j~ ~OK ~= w Fri ° w O,.,Z~ O ~ o K N O v F O O Z v O LL O~ V m S~ l l N - ° LL ri w OZ ..mZ F s? ~., Z ° O ~ ~ o ~ ° _ ¢ ~ ~ = s Z O ~ ~- ~., '- v 3 i ~ w ' V Zw as ~ '~ a _ 3~~0 ,~ , .. w a ~ ~ ~NSr ~F~a~a ~O Z "' ~ - z Ov ~ ~~ n n n ~Z~ia~~ Z O O ~>>~ ~ 000 ,,, ~w~ _w ~ ~ ~ <o a a d o ~~o ~ N ~ j ~Faa ..__ w o Zj Z o _OOi- o.- ~ Q O vim °~ 43 O W O m , _ U~ N ~ Q ~ o ~~°° Y~ j ° n u 0 ~ F \ ~~ W ° Q .- ,., a O a o f i o3~E i7 _ ,., ~ - ~ ~ ti b x m l I I I~ ~ ~ ti II I~ ? t I~~ ~ -.{ I ~ I"+ ( j ji J I~ W 1 _ Z M ~ I( ii ~ n .. •e. Q' Ck a ~ .~ ~ ` / ~ i r~~ : n J =~. w ~ ~, (~ ~; ~ o ul t^. w ~ ~ ~ ~ x U ~ C v r c ~' w -a c ~, G F P~-~'S M M=AN `'~ ,~ ~,, ' ~ `~ ~ m z J O F-' d- MAN' ~~'o d%>-(d o~ ~~ ~\~ ~ ~ `~ a ~ ~i ~ _ `J J I ~ `~~ .i u~ V' ~ \ d~ ,~~ \ t~ ~ -~..r~ • J ~ ~ e. ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~.~. _ ~~~_ AA-- ~ 1 Q ~ -l ~~~i LL- ~ `C \ ~. ~' '~a b~~ J/b ~ GOO ~~~~ ~ ~~ '7d~ ~ ~~ J,d _` 0~~\Gl i ~~tK~~,; b bJ i ~ ~ ~' ~ \ ~~~~;' , 71!'x. ` 'LiA l . ~ ~ ? 'o' o ' Q ~ c~C S ~ G~F,~ ~p~o , U ~- / O ~p`~` ~ ~ \ Q P +`~~O/d ~ ,~c~ Q Z `~ idi c' Ob~J-~ Z - ~ ~- J ~ , ~ -``` 0 d O Q. Q ~ b\ ~ o~ ~ \ ~ 1 ~~ t~2 60 C d 1 ] r d \ ~ ~~ ~__~ w ~ _ , ~ ~ , O~ i, J / 1 m ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~ ~ ' \O Q` V 1 ..~ ...~ ~.~ ~ fem.-- f S o ~ R ,_-/ ,'~ PEA ~~EEK } __ ----- . r~ `~.i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~L c~,~ ~< ?'• ~~ ~, ~„"` v \ lr -.~\\ l L ti:. ~"\ t i C 1.,"~...., ..1 S ~ I-F ~` . i ~ - ~ 0~.^~ ` i I ~~~ \ ~„H ~.1' ° -~ ~~~~~ `~`~ cn/~~~~~ ` 1~~~_ ~~ ~~ lC^` ~~~~Ly,~l(~ ~i I ~jFl~r~~~1%~6f ~ ~=' \~~' I/~~~ \-- \o~`~\U, \~~- ~- _ ~ .-o/ ~/ ~ , li \ \1 /~~.`r 1~`\. ~~\ ~~`~~o\~~`_ ~-~~ `\1 (fi\~ ( r _ ~ / \~1 ~i~1~I \ ' ~ ` ~ I1 u ~ ~ ~ ~ \J: ~ i ~ ~~ / `~1 - ~ - ~ / ., ~~- _ . ~.1~~ - ~- A ~I'f{„~ ,f,/ ~\ I 0 :,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~- a, 3 Boxley Hills Nei hborhood Association Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting June 25, 1991 In 1986, county residents approved a $ l Sir Now tgeene~ ject i.gno to ger aregional° pay for the county's share of the regional reservo P and the full cost, currently estimated at $72 million fal~sf s~ 986e1w~ ~ its cap ~al doutlay, county residents. This makes the approved bond issue , irrelevant to the current reservoir project, its cost, and to those obligated to pay for its construction. Unfortunately, county residents are not always dirdkMeetinps ~~And altho ghcthe Supervisor on issues that concern them until these Bo g project has received coverage in the Roanoke Timeever Wnelsut scribes t ~ the paper or County Today supplement of the evening paper, not y reads the articles unless the headlines appear alarmingr~d nt fiscal management is begng in this forum we can only assume that efficient and p practiced in all other areas of the county budget and tl to trate~rovert~t} ehnext five years our utility tax from 6 to 12 percent and double our wa will be approved and come to fruition due to no other financial or construction alternatives. The residents of Boxley Hills do not question the county's position on providing a water reservoir which will meet the future resident and business needs of the county. However, given Supervisor Eddy's recommendation that there are perhaps alternatives to this major project and the expenses incurred by county residents, and that this project has not been approved by a county bond issue, the 480~nesidents of the Boxley Hills Neighborhood Association vote against approving thi p Respectfully submitted, David R. Murray Immediate Past President Boxley Hills Neighborhood Association COUNTY OF ROANOl~, VIRGINIA ~ q /_ ~ ~ ~ SPRING HOLLOW WATER SUPPLY p(AMPLES OF EFFECT ON Cff1ZENS CURRENT PROPOSED MONTHLY MAXIMUM FF MONTHLY DMFERE CE IXPENSE EXPENSE ERENCE DI Citizen with self-owned water supply Utility Consumer Tax 0.90 $ 10.80 Electricity $ 0.90 $ 1.80 $ 0.90 10.80 0.90 1.80 10.80 Gas 0.90 1.80 0.90 Telephone ~ 32_40 Citizen with private water company Utility Consumer Tax $ 1 80 $ 0.90 $ 10.80 Electricity $ 0.90 90 0 . 1.80 0.90 10.80 Gas . 0.90 1.80 0.90 10.80 60 21 Telephone 00 0 1.80 1 80 . Water . 54.00 ith County water - 5,000 gallons a month usage (average user) Citizen w Utility Bills $ 12.21 $ 16.46 $ 4.25 $ 51.00 00 0 Water 9.49 9.49 0.00 . Sewer Utility Consumer Tax 1 80 0.90 10.80 Electricity 0'90 80 1 0.90 10.80 Gas 0.90 . 1 80 0.90 10.80 Telephone 0.90 00 0 . 1.80 1.80 21.60 Water . 1~ p5,p0 Citizen with County water - 10,000 gallons a month usage (high user) Utility bills 72.60 $ 17.41 $ 23.46 $ 6.05 $ Water 13.39 0.00 0.00 Sewer 13.39 Utility consumer tax 1 80 0.90 10.80 Electricity 0.90 80 1 0.90 10.80 Gas 0.90 0 90 . 1.80 0.90 10.80 Telephone ' 00 0 1.80 1.80 21.60 Water . 126.60 County of Roanoke Comparative Quarterly Utility Bills erly bills based upon the current les of comparative qua Listed below are several examp sed water rates for 2 1991 9 water rates and th e propo Current Proposed Total Quarterly Quarterfy Water Usage in Gallons ~uarterty Bill p~~erty gill Increase Amount Percent 000 12 Water $ 33.51 $ 45.18 13 26 , Sewer 2613 6 . 4 ~~ 19.6% 59. ~--.- 000 18 Water $ 39.75 $ 53.58 81 30 , Sewer 30.81 ~ . 13,83= 19.6% 000 24 Water $ 45.99 $ 61.98 49 35 , Sewer 35.49 . 15.99 19.6% 000 30 Water $ 52.23 $ 70.38 17 40 , Sewer 40 17 2 ~----- . 1~_~ $ 18.15 19.6% Spring Hollow Water Project FACT SHEET Why do we need the Spring Hollow Water Project? • The County expects to use 17 million gallons per day within the next 50 years to serve the growing needs. Roanoke City's recent consultant's report stressed the need for a new water supply by the year 2010. Roanoke County has tried to supply water with wells over the past 20 years. These efforts have failed to provide the adequate amount and the quality of water needed. In 1980, the County used 90 wells, the County now uses only 69, the difference being lost in contamination and drought. N towards a newlawate~s pplyquate water and poor quality have helped in moving Is this project a duplication of Roanoke City's current water project? • The City improvements have always been part of the overall plan for supplying Roanoke Valley with water. Th ~~ Int' needs. RoanrokegCounty wil~lbu Id a new meet higher demands and trea system to supply existing needs and provide for new orderly growth. ff the City and the County had consolidated, would we still need the Spring Hollow Project? • Consolidation of the local governments would not have postponed or eliminated the need to upgrade the City's system or build the County's new system, nor would it have cost anyone less m he needed improvementsh n thei a respect ve would have paid separately for t localities. What effect will this project have on the Roanoke River? • The Spring Hollow Project will play a major role in improving the quality of the river. The project will actually add water to the river during low flow periods. What is the cost of the Project? • The Spring Hollow Water Project is broken down into components as follows: $36,440,000 Spring Hollow Reservoir 28,246,000 Water Treatment Facility 2,083,000 Distribution Storage 5 408,000 Transmission Mains $ 72,177,000 How will the County pay for this project? The County will need to sell bonds to pay for this project. In order to repay these bonds, the County will need to raise revenues from the following sources: (1) Increase in water rates; (2) Increase in water connection fees; and, (3) Increase in utility consumer tax. How much will my water bill increase? • The needed increase in water rates will be spread over the next five fiscal years as follows: Percent Incxease from Previous Year 35% 10% 10% 10% 10% Year 1991-1992 1992-1993 1993-1994 19941995 1995-1996 allons of water a month is currently paying $36.63 a A resident who uses 5,000 g quarter for water. Beginning July 1, 1991, their water bill will be $49.38 per quarter, which is an increase of $12.75, or $4.25 per month. How will I be affected by an increase in water connection fees? • A water connection fee is a one time charge to connect a new ou wdll not have water system. ff you are already connected to the water system, y to pay this fee. ff you build a new house or buildi o ~ will need to pay t isg ee. m using a private well to the County water system, y • The water connection fee will be increased over the next five years as follows: Water Connection Fee $1,036 2,210 2,320 2,440 2,560 2,690 Year Current 1991-1992 1992-1993 1993-1994 19941995 1995-1996 How will I be affected by an increase in utility consumer tax? The utility consumer tax is a tax that is ~ tee honensThe taxSS added to~hese residential charges for electricity, gas, an p utility billings. This tax will be increased frS a ~ ble ut~ty Thislme'ans thatlthe to the first $15. Also, water will be added a maximum monthly tax on each residential utility will be $1.80. Commercial or industrial users are taxed charges, so the maximum monthly tax on on the first $5,000 of monthly utility each commercial utility will be $600. 2 When will these increases be effective? • The water rate increase and the water connection fee increase will be effective for service received on or after July 1, 1991. The utility consumer tax will be effective for billings on or after September 1, 1991. Is water becoming an expensive commodity? • Federal and State regulations that control the quality of the water you drink greatly increase the cost of producing the water. However, when you compare the cost of water, which is an essential commodity, to some of your other monthly bills, you may be surprised. Average Service Monthly Bill Electricity $56.83 Gas 35.00 Cable Television 28.00 Water (new 1991-92 rates) 16.46 Telephone ~ 16.14 • Some other costs comparisons show that water can be a real bargain: Commodity Price per Ton Soft Drinks $1,315.00 Milk 504.00 Dirt 5'~ Gravel 4.50 Water 0'78 3 ~ qi_~ 5~~~, J ^/ ~, ~ P .~ Y ~d<<~, ,~ ,~~~,~~ ~~~1~~~~~ Too( ~-~-_~~s ~ y r ~.~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ GULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD Off' $yPADMINIBTRATI NACENTER ON Y, AT A RE VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE UNE 25, 1991 TUESDAY, ORDINANCE 625-8 VACATING A TWELVE (12) FOOT PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 4, BLOCK 5, UTILITY AND PAGE SECTION 1, HIDDEN VALLGISTER AL DISTRICT ON APB 3, 305), WINDSOR HILLS MA WHEREAS, Ronald B. Smith has requested the Board of Superv- ublic isors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 12-foot p Block 5, Section utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, isterial Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Mag' 1, rict as shown in Plat Book 3, at page 305 of record in t e Dist Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, inia, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virg lished by the as amended, requires that such action be accomp the governing body; and, adoption of an ordinance by Section 15.1- iven as required by WHEREAS, notice has been g' the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading 431 of is ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second of th 1991. reading of this ordinance was held on June 25- BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: and drainage easement 1, That a 12-foot public utility Hidden Valley Homes Subdivi- Block 5, Section 1, located on Lot 4, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Sion 3 at page 305, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Book , vacated be, and hereby is, Virginia, Court of Roanoke County, as suant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, pur amended; and, 2, That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect s S thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Ronald B. Smith shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by Ronald B. Smith, his heirs, successors, or assigns. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: /~' ~--~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # _._._ C~ ITEM NUMBER ~~M AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 _AGENDA ITEM: To vacate a 12' Public Utility and Drainage Easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision, Recorded in Piat Book 3, Page 305, situated in the Windsor Hill Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS :_ G~+,~~ EXECUTIVE S__UMMARY. The petitioner, Ronald B. Smith, is requesting the Board of Supervisors to vacate a 12' public utility and drainage easement which runs the entire width of his property, by ordinance, in order to remove the encumbrance on his lot. BACKGROUND• Mr. Ronald Smith's request involves vacating a 12' wide public utility and drainage easement which parallels his rear property line (refer to the attached map}. The reason for vacating the easement is because the rear southeast corner of the lot is the only area suitable in which to construct a garage. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION_:_ Roanoke County Staff is requesting that the described public utility and drainage easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The County Staff and Public Utility Companies have no objections. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; public hearing and second reading is scheduled for June 25, 1991. ~_ q. .FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF 12ECOMMENDATION: County Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors the attached ordinance. adopt MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Direct r Elmer C. Hodg--~-- of Engineering & Inspections County Administrator ------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE APProved { ) Motion by• Denied { ) No Yes Abs Edd Received ( ) Referred To Y Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers '~~r~ *~' HiCxC~ •s~ ~ ~yy~,~R M 44Pt MIE N ~` E~IMr~ ~~ lWl~`O'4'wOr'C Sl 'MEab~~, ,K Q t' Y citiawo.~ ~t MIS v4' ~ ~ 4, i-a E ~~ y+A ooy~ R ..~, ~. r Sl ~ ~ ' E 1 GRn nr~:nS \ ® ~ wrwwE~ ° gF :r 4 NI'~L .orf .• BRi[7:C 3v ~o fr.','t'~ r ~~~,~~ 1`r,;. ~J ~LI~ _ _ X03 yy 7 x aS f'LflCR* ~~R ~ ~y ~ htr rQ6L~~ Yr'p~V'~~~J'~,~• "~~r ~~^~r~KDeu+c~ `~. ~e ,,,~ as 3`'~' ~ , VICINITYMAP;r ~ `~ " ~- ~~-~~, ~///~~ry~\\\/~ V NORTB 2•~ ~ '-/~ a `JO• ~ ~°' ti~ M ~J h~ ~ 4 ~ o~ ~~~ ~, ~~ `~ ,~~ < 0 ti _~J.,'~~ ~? ~'- '~A~Qo E. / - _ ~~ - ,pG~E , ,w9L/C Uf/L/fY EASE D - - __ S~3rei 1 O; l o'~ o \ '~ \_ J ) F a°, w° `' ~ r c ~~ o ~~o~oQ A' ~~ ~ ~ 4 ~ a _ryi -so .°% ~ti °~ ,~ ti ~ o ~, w ti ti ti ' o ~w ~~ ~( ~~! ~ g°\"/"•r'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.~~o ~ 094 ~' f / Aso ~i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ %} ~ ~ ~~r• ti ~ 4 ~ \ r ~ ~~•q~' ~~/ fA P 10 ~ n4 ~ h1C s/C v ~ ~ ~ V ~ `' '~ ff107 /f7 ^ i \4~0 1Y ~ i `fb ~ ~ sv//Cj/ / p .~ i ~~ / r+r / V ~ VACATION OF A 12' PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON LOT 4, BNGINBSRING BLOCK S, SECTION 1 , HIDDEN VALLEY HOMES SUBDIVISION 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE VACATING A TWELVE (12) FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 4, BLOCK 5, SECTION 1, HIDDEN VALLEY HOMES SUBDIVISION (PB 3, PAGE 305), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ronald B. Smith has requested the Board of Superv- isors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 12-foot public utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 3, at page 305 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 12-foot public utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivi- sion in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 3, at page 305, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect ~~<-y thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Ronald B. Smith shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by Ronald B. Smith, his heirs, successors, or assigns. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading and Public Hearing on Ordinances regarding Recycling and the use of Recycled paper and paper products, and approval of Solid Waste Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• ~~~ ~ ~~~ BACRGROUND: The Virginia Commonwealth laws require every municipality in the Commonwealth to develop a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. The County staff has been working with the State Department of Waste Management, the Clean Valley Council, and the participants in the Regional Landfill to develop a County Plan which will have regional application. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County has developed the attached plan which is designed to attain the mandated long and short range diversion objectives by using the following approach: • Attain maximum recycling participation by the businesses and private haulers by managing an aggressive reporting system. • Conduct landfill operations on a regional basis. Trash will be delivered to a centrally located transfer station, loaded, and transported daily to the landfill. • Provide a yard waste program to ensure maximum diversion of materials. • Develop an active white goods recovery program to ensure maximum diversion from the landfill. 1 ~9i-~ • Gain general population participation in recycling through education, the use of curbside pick up, area drop-off centers, and school and community collection programs. • Establish an efficient residential collection program through the maximum use of automated (one-armed side loader) collection vehicles for regular trash. The attached ordinances are designed to support the plan outlined above and are written within the guidelines of the enabling legislation. FISCAL IMPACT SOLID WASTE Capital Operating Solid Waste Total RECYCLE Capital Operating Recycle Costs SOLID WASTE PLAN OPERATIONAL COST Funds Required Above Current Allocation Thousands of dollars FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 $0 $0 $0 $335 $335 0 0 0 240 288 $0 $0 $0 $575 $573 $0 $0 $0 $114 $138 0 0 0 85 150 $0 $0 $0 $199 $288 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $774 $861 per year The above figures cover "collection costs" but do not include tipping fees and administrative costs. These figures are derived from Source Separation costs which are the most expensive option. Since Source Separation and Commingled Collection are both being tested, it was best to present the estimated "worst case". After test results are completed, staff will recommend the most economic and efficient option. 2 ~9/-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends second reading of Ordinances and Public Hearing on Ordinances and Solid Waste Plan. ,,r.-~ fully s itte , Approved by, ~~ w/ Gardner w. Smith, Director Elmer C. Hodq - ~.- Department of General Services County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 3 ,~ '~ ~" ~`~~-~ ROANORE COIINTY COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN SECOND DRAFT June 18, 1991 Staff Report TENTATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ ~{ ~;` ..~..~ I. Executive Summary II. Introduction A. Legislation B. Regulations C. Objective/Performance Requirements D. General Description E. Population 1. Population Density 2. Growth and Trends III. Current Collection Systems A. County B. Evaluation of Private Systems 1. Cycle Systems, Inc. 2. Handy Dump IV. Current Waste Disposal Facilities V. Waste Generation Analysis (Residential and Commercial) VI. Long-Term Waste Management Goals VII. Assessment of Hierarchial Levels A. Source Reduction 1. In-house strategies 2. General strategies 3. Public education/awareness 4. Commercial/industrial B. Reuse 1. Strategies 2. Objectives C. Recycling 1. Objectives a. Residential recycling program b. Commercial recycling program c. Yard waste management program 2. Public "Outreach" Program (Current and Future) a. General public b. Area schools c. Business or industry D. Waste - Energy E. Incineration F. Landfills VIII. Summary ri f ~~~~ INDEX OF APPENDICES Appendix A Stages of Accomplishment Appendix B Roanoke County Enacted Ordinances Appendix C Requirement Checklist Appendix D Roanoke County Schools Recycling Activities Appendix E Citizen Advisory Committee Summary Appendix F Public Hearing Minutes Appendix G Definitions ' Appendix H Board of Supervisor's Resolution Appendix I Method of Reporting Statistics I + ~,~ r,~- .:~~ ~<~-r-- ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ . ~'~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Virginia Commonwealth laws require every municipality in the Commonwealth to develop a comprehensive solid waste management plan. The Plan must be submitted to the Department of Waste Management by July 1, 1991. The plan will include an integrated waste management strategy illustrating the hierarchy of source reduction, reuse, recycling, resource recovery, incineration, and landfilling. The County is committed to reaching the mandate. The County plans to attain its long and short range diversion objectives by using the following approach: • Attain maximum recycling participation by the businesses and private haulers by managing an aggressive reporting system. • Conduct landfill operations on a regional basis. Trash will be delivered to a centrally located transfer station, loaded, and transported daily to the landfill. • Provide a yard waste program to ensure maximum diversion of materials. • Develop an active white goods recovery program to ensure maximum diversion from the landfill. • Gain general population participation in recycling through education, the use of curbside pick up, area drop-off centers, and school and community collection programs. • Utilize education and community involvement to keep the total solid waste program at the forefront. • Establish an efficient residential collection program through the maximum use of automated (one-armed side loader) collection vehicles for regular trash. Legislation The Virginia State General Assembly has passed legislation to establish the parameters to plan and implement the solid waste management programs. House Bill 1743 allows the Department of Waste Management to specify requirements for local comprehensive solid waste management plans. By-July 1, 1992, all localities must have an approved comprehensive solid waste plan. All plans must identify how minimum recycling goals of 10% by 1991, 15% by 1993 and 25% by 1995 will be reached. 2 - ~~~ The Virginia Waste Management Board will provide staff assistance to local governments, encourage source reduction, and assist in education programs on solid waste issues. Performance Requirements and Objectives Performance Requirements: • Plan completed and submitted to the Department of Waste Management no later than July 1, 1991. • Report to update Plan must then be submitted by July 1, 1996 and each 5-year period thereafter. Plan Parameters and Objectives: • A comprehensive waste management strategy. • Incremental stages and schedule. • Description of the funding resource requirements. • Strategy for provision of funding. • Public education and information programs on recycling. • Consideration of private/public partnerships. • Methodology to achieve recycling goals of 25~ by 1995. • Progress report submitted within 120 days of the ' prescribed time. • A procedure to monitor the total solid waste stream in place by July 1, 1991. General Description A Solid Waste Management Plan that correctly reflects the impact of solid waste disposal must give consideration to the environmental characteristics and land use within the region. Roanoke County is located in the Fifth Planning District and is situated on the eastern border of the Appalachian Plateau. It is approximately 251 square miles with a population of approximately 71,667 (1990 census, excludes Town of Vinton). Interstate 81 and U. S. Route 220 are the major thoroughfares that serve Roanoke- County, but there are several other major arteries. Route 419 serves as a major transportation link as it 4 - a~ ~ x.,. ~~- growth in the entire Fifth Planning District will grow .4~ annually between 1990 and 2010. Population density will be an important factor in considering the feasibility of various solid waste management strategies. For example, curbside collection works more efficiently in the more urban areas, whereas drop-off centers work more efficiently in the rural areas. In terms of actual household information, the number of persons per house decreased from 1970 to 1980, but remained fairly stable from 1980 to 1987, while the actual number of households increased. Roanoke County has some 25,500 households to be serviced. The largest age group in the 1990 census was the 25-44 group, which can have a dramatic effect on solid waste management planning. The current population, excluding Vinton, is approximately 71,667. Projected increases are as follows (1995) 72,821; (2000) 74,289; (2010) 77,314. In terms of population density, Roanoke County has 301 persons per square mile as compared to 2,293 for Roanoke City, and 1,729 for Salem. Educationally, Roanoke County has the highest percentage of people over the age of 25 who have completed high school in the Roanoke Valley. Within the Fifth Planning District, the highest percentage of those over 25 who have completed four years of college reside in the County. This characteristic will positively influence the development of new solid waste disposal methods as educated persons learn the important reasons for changing their waste disposal methods. Approximately 90% of Roanoke County citizens live in what is defined as urban setting (i.e. the number of persons per square mile is high). The definition of urban vs. rural is commonly determined by whether residents receive public water/sewer or have private wells/septic tanks. This urban versus rural community is an important factor when considering the feasibility of various solid waste collection methods. Roanoke County currently operates on an 18/82 revenue tax basis. The commercial/industrial provides 18% of tax revenue and the residential personal property and real estate provide 82$. The ultimate goal is 25/75. More than 40% of the waste going into the existing Regional Landfill comes from a commercial/industrial source. There are approximately 4,000 businesses licensed in the County; more than half operate out of the home. Approximately 1,300 are listed in the March 1988 issue of County Business Patterns. In terms~of size there are only 34 establishments which have 50 or more employees. Almost 60% have four or fewer 6 G~fR.~ A third collection process is the collection of bulk and yard waste items that are not part of the normal daily household waste stream. The large items, such as furniture, white goods, water heaters, old carpeting and roofing materials are collected in large quantities during various times during the year. The size of the crews and vehicles assigned will vary based on these fluctuations. The crew assignment levels and vehicle assignments are very flexible and depend upon assessments made by field supervisors. Private Collection Systems The collection of refuse in the County includes private haulers who provide service to businesses and schools, and multi- family dwellings. These haulers are in two categories. There are firms who collect commercial/residential waste and those who handle by-product disposal from their own business. The three "main component" haulers of waste in the Roanoke Valley are Cycle Systems, Handy Dump, and Virginia Container Systems. These companies use the Regional Landfill and can be expected to continue to do so. Two of the "by-product" haulers of solid waste are Thomas Brothers, Inc. and J. M. Turner Company. These companies are in the construction business and have to haul and dispose of "clean" construction debris. Previously, these types of companies were allowed to own and operate private landfills that handled only construction waste that was thought to have little or no impact on the environment. However, future Commonwealth regulations will call for (and enforce) the same strict operation standards for small private construction landfills that will be in effect for larger sanitary landfills. These smaller operations will become more expensive and decrease in number as the older construction landfills reach capacity. As part of the development of its solid waste plan, each locality will evaluate its existing garbage collection system and provide for improvements, if necessary. According to a report published by the Environmental Protection Agency, a typical governmental solid waste collection system would address the following: • Environmental Protection - healthful, sanitary, and aesthetic. • Convenience - readily available service. • Continuity - uninterrupted service. • Resource Recovery - reclaim where desired. _ $ ~ ~i s newspaper, corrugated chip board, aluminum and bi-metal beverage containers, and several other materials at the specific request of the customer. They have also developed a paper route on which establishments with a high volume of paper waste will be collected and taken back to the plant for processing. Cycle Systems distributes waste containers appropriate to the amount of waste generated in any given area, the garbage collection vehicles are not chosen according to the amount of trash generated. Instead, vehicles are chosen in compliance with Commonwealth and local ordinances, as well as to be of an efficient size to travel along the streets of the collection area. Handy Dump Handy Dump is a commercial hauler that collects non-hazardous solid waste from businesses throughout the Roanoke Valley. In order to ensure a "healthful, sanitary, and aesthetic" collection system, Handy Dump follows several industry standards, such as using self-contained trucks and containers for the collection and storage of solid waste. Each Handy Dump client has a dumpster on-site for the storage of solid waste. In addition to these individual collection sites, Handy Dump also has a drop-off center for recyclables on-site at the Handy Dump office on River Avenue in Roanoke. Currently, Handy Dump does not conduct residential curbside collection. Handy Dump does conduct some material separation at its plant. Clients are asked to practice in-house source separation, when practical. Recyclable materials that are retrieved from the waste stream are sold to brokers and end-users. Handy Dump operates as efficiently as possible to provide maximum service at minimal costs, so therefore, the collection routes and the types of vehicles used for collection are chosen to reflect the best interests of both customer and provider. Each client served by Handy Dump rents waste containers according to the amount of waste it generates. Handy Dump offers waste containers in four, six, or eight cubic yard sizes; twenty, thirty, or forty cubic yard sizes, along with some special sizes. CURRENT WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES The Roanoke Regional Landfill is located in the Southeastern corner of Roanoke County at 1212 Rutrough Road and is operating on a 290 acre site. There are some 90 acres of land currently being used with the remainder being utilized as buffer zones or other - 10 ~, ROANOKE COUNTY FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 FY 1990 Tons 25,218 24,724 26,890 28,896 In the Roanoke Valley last year, 203,023 tons of processible waste were disposed of in the Regional Landfill. Roanoke County residential waste comprised approximately 14~ of that total. Per capita generation of residential waste for Roanoke County was .4 tons per year, equal to 2.2 pounds per day. Commercial/industrial waste and waste hauled to the landfill by private concerns constituted approximately 57%. Due to numerous crossing of jurisdictional lines, the collection system has not been able to report Roanoke County's portion of the commercial waste stream. The private haulers are developing a method to assign commercial waste to specific localities to provide better data for the comprehensive plan. It is very difficult to accurately project waste flows because of the extreme fluctuation of waste production, especially commercial/industrial waste. Product packaging plays an important role in determining the waste stream. Waste flow trends are based on three factors: population projections, current per capita waste generation, and the national trend for per capita waste production. Although these figures are widely used as the means to predict future waste generation, there are several reasons why they may not be completely accurate. Each region differs as to waste production depending upon industrial development, commercial activities, and population. In determining future waste trends, planners will consider the possibility of natural disasters. The occurrence of Hurricane Hugo dramatically increased the amount of waste landfilled for that year. Seasonal changes also have an effect on amounts of waste disposed. Economic conditions, and of course population growth all have an effect on waste production. Olver, Inc., in the 1988 Solid Waste Management Plan, predicted a steady .6o annual increase in processible solid waste (residential only). Based on the current rate of 2.2 pounds per person per day, and the national average increase of .6%, the pounds per person is expected to increase to 2.48 by the year 2010. Combining this value with the estimated population increases, produces the following predicted quantities of residential waste: 1990 1995 2000 2005 Tons 28,896 30,035 31,275 33,333 In the Roanoke County area, population is increase, causing an increase in residential waste. 2010 34,992 expected to The increase 12 ~~- Detailed studies and recommendations on large scale resource recovery and recycling projects for the region. Efforts to establish or encourage new regional collection and marketing of recycled materials. Explore new technology in curbside collection of household waste to include automation of at least 90~ of the County. To expand the current automated service to the desired level of participation will require four more vehicles @ $120,000 each and approximately 10,000 containers @ $65 each, for an investment of $1,130,000. The remaining 10% of the County will require the purchase of two manual loading rear-loaders and the additional employment of at least six personnel. All monies for the solid waste diversion will come from the General Fund. The County has no plans in the current five year program period to institute use of volume based fees. Develop a comprehensive recycle program with a combination of curbside and drop-off service. (Details and financial impact to be discussed later). Continuous assessment of waste management strategy with emphasis on developing new and implementing current solid waste management techniques. ASSESSMENT OF HIERARCHY The Department of Waste Management listed several options that must be addressed in a comprehensive solid waste plan. These levels are source reduction, reuse, recycling, resource recovery (waste to energy), incineration, and landfilling. In evaluating these alternatives, the County will address long-range objectives, funding requirements, economic and environmental impact, and public education requirements for each alternative. This report will evaluate each of the levels of hierarchy as they pertain to the long range plans of Roanoke County. Source Reduction The elimination or lessening the generation of waste rather than lessening disposal amounts is the basic premise behind the hierarchy level known as source reduction. Source reduction needs to be fostered at the manufacturing, government, and citizen level. The County of Roanoke intends to utilize the element of source reduction in several different areas of County activities. The elements of a source reduction program are product reuse, 14 proposed local ordinance Appendix ~,'). Establish a waste reduction policy with full support from top management and elected officials to worker level. Establish an employee training program that emphasizes the importance of waste reduction and efficient materials handling practices (e.g. keep lids on degreasers and avoid spills during material transfers and use). Establish an employee incentive program that rewards employees for their waste reduction efforts and their suggestions on measures to enhance program success. Require that all capital improvements be reviewed in respect to a waste reduction program. Require special approval for volumes of 55-gallon drums and more for all toxic chemicals. Label containers properly to avoid misuse of materials; inspect on-hand material on a regular basis. Establish a rigorous maintenance program to keep equipment operating efficiently. Replace caustic solutions with detergent-based solutions and solvent cleaners with water-based cleaners. Use drip pans when working on damaged vehicles or changing fluids. Recycle waste oil, spent antifreeze, and spent batteries. Use dry adsorbents to clean up spills. Use high pressure spray nozzles. Public Education/Awareness: Activities to encourage source reduction and teach citizens to become environmental shoppers. Plan educational curricula (with assistance of Clean Valley Council) emphasizing need for source reduction, consequences, available choices, benefits, costs, and goodwill. Educational emphasis given to awareness program aimed at consumers. Educate citizens as to specific, immediate actions that can 16 ~f -^ waste. Roanoke County will implement a comprehensive strategy for source reduction after evaluating all of the options. Many of the in-house activities planned will be phased over a gradual period. The public awareness as well as that of the commercial sector will be a joint effort between Roanoke County, Clean Valley Council, and the Roanoke County Recycle Advisory Committee. Many of the ideas espoused in the education phase have already begun under the auspices of the Clean Valley Council. The social and economic equity of all activities will be considered, as will the economic feasibility. The main component of source reduction is education. Many of the ideas generated under such a program can actually be cost saving ideas. The overall impact on the environment will be a main concern and will be carefully studied before any programs are implemented. Reuse The "throw-away" philosophy is responsible for the crisis now being faced at many landfills. Landfills in the past have handled up to 80~ of the nation's trash, but this trend cannot continue as space is running out. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that within five years, half of the entire country's landfills will be sealed and shut down. If the landfill crisis is to be addressed properly, strategies for reuse of eligible material must be formulated. Reuse is placed higher than even "recycling" on the Virginia Waste Management Board's Hierarchy of solid waste management alternatives, primarily because reuse does not require physical change of an item. Reuse does not require the extensive market research and effort that recycling does. If reuse is employed by Roanoke County citizens, recycling will come naturally because reuse involves changing our waste disposal habits. Reuse is a major part of the solution to our waste disposal problems. Plans for implementing reuse as part of the County's integrated solid waste management plan will follow closely with those general reuse opportunities outlined in the State Planning Assistance Program. These plans will involve aiming direct appeals at residential and commercial waste contributors to evaluate opportunities for materials reuse, instead of disposal. More specifically, reuse will be encouraged County-wide in the following ways: • Educational efforts will be focused on both residents of Roanoke County and commercial or private businesses 18 #~ participation rates doubled immediately to 24o and have since averaged approximately 32%. Some 200 of the additional residents have been asked to only set out their recycle bins every other week. Test results are incomplete at this time. County staff is in the process of developing a survey to ascertain the effect of twice monthly source separated collection from weekly (i.e., overflow, convenience, and suitability of containers). A comparison of tonnages is being done before the switch to twice-monthly and will be done after the switch. Staff is also comparing the difference from week to week. By using this data, analysis can be made as to whether the containers have ample volume. The twice-monthly method of collection would be less costly than weekly collection, but more costly and less convenient than monthly automated. In an effort to implement a comprehensive solid waste management strategy, staff began to test automated commingle recycling in a limited area. By implementing this type of collection method for recycling, Roanoke County would have a method of collecting both recycling and regular household trash that was both efficient and complimentary (i.e, each serves as a backup for the other). In the automated commingle program, each resident was given a 60 gallon container in which to commingle the recyclable materials. The list of materials collected in the program include mixed grade paper (newsprint, junk mail, magazines, and office/computer paper), corrugated cardboard, aluminum, bi-metal, and plastic. The container is then collected once a month by an automated truck with a single operator. In addition to curbside service to a limited area, Roanoke County residents have the opportunity to recycle at a variety of drop-off centers located throughout the Valley. There are several centers located at various Kroger stores that will accept newsprint, aluminum, glass and plastic. The Clean Valley Council operates a community recycling station that accepts mixed paper, corrugated cardboard, aluminum, plastic, and bi-metal. Multiple private concerns offer drop-off centers, such as Handy Dump, Chesapeake and Reynolds Aluminum (list not meant to be all inclusive but rather to illustrate variety of recycling methods offered to residents). The ultimate objective of Roanoke County's recycling strategy is to implement the program that not only achieves the State mandated goals of 10 o by 1991, 15 o by 1993 and 25% by 1995, but also provides the most economical, feasible and convenient method of collection to its citizens. The plan detailed in the following pages will outline the County's objectives, with both a timeline and cost of achieving those objectives. 20 r~ ~~- Sorting and weighing of waste to determine exact makeup can be extremely time consuming and expensive. Some experts contend that any locality's waste stream will be within 1 - 2$ of the national average, although seasonal fluctuations could occur. Given the mild nature of Roanoke County's weather, the infrequence of natural disasters, and the relative stability of population (little seasonal influx of tourists), Roanoke County's municipal waste stream composition probably remains within the 1 - 2$ deviation. According to the national figures given by EPA, the municipal solid waste is comprised of the following materials: Composition of Roanoke County Solid Waste Material Paper/Paperboard Glass Yard Waste Food Waste Metals Aluminum Rubber/Leather/Textiles/Wood Plastics Percentase by Weight 41.0$ 8.2% 17.9% 7.90 8.0% .70 8.1~ 6.50 In planning a program, volume, ease of recyclability and markets for each material must be assessed. The Department of Waste Management, as a part of their technical assistance program for local governments, commissioned the Marketing Information Data and Services, Inc. (MIDAS), to conduct a market study for recyclable materials. MIDAS searched 2,000 databases to generate data and information on recycling and the markets for recycling in the Commonwealth of Virginia. In the report to DWM the MIDAS group made the following extrapolations: Markets do exist for the recyclables identified in the study (glass, paper, plastic, and metal). Virginia industry has the potential to use all of the recyclable material resulting from Virginia's recycling programs, once the items have been collected and processed. • In turn, markets for these materials made from recycled content need to be assured through a determined commitment from the public, local government and private sector. In analyzing marketing strategies there are several factors that need to be evaluated. Marketing strategies can develop along the same line as col-lection methods. Localities can either opt to perform the marketing service themselves or they can contract with 22 CO ~/ providing services and not the in the business of competing with the private sector in areas such as marketing. Marketing in-house would require additional staff for tracking of markets, procuring contracts, inspecting materials, packaging and processing. Contracting with local entities serves the twofold advantage of supporting privatization and allowing the County to concentrate on efficient curbside residential refuse collection service. Roanoke County will continue to contract the processing of recyclable materials in the foreseeable future. The option is available for increased in-house operations. In the past, the service has always been provided by the most established vendor due to the pilot (uncertain) nature of the test. After the completion of the test phases, the contract will be put out to bid and be awarded to the most responsive and cost competitive bidder. Residential Recycling Program Source Separation and Commingled Two types of household recycle collection being performed are employed by Roanoke County. These two processes, Source Separation and Commingle, differ in the degree of materials segregation performed by the household. Roanoke County is in the process of testing both methods to see which yields the highest participation rates, the highest material returns, and the most cost efficient operation. Studies have shown (County test included) that the success of curbside programs is attributed to the impact of the municipality providing containers to the residents. This enhances convenience, was a main motivator, and served as a constant reminder to the residents. Roanoke County chose to test a source separated program and an automated commingle program. In the source separated program, the residents were given three stackable bins in which to place newsprint, aluminum, and glass. The program requires that residents separate recyclables from non-recyclables and then segregate the recyclables by placing them in the stackable bins and setting the bins at the curb weekly. The program participation has averaged 32~ on a weekly basis and 89~ on a monthly basis (meaning 89 0 of the residents have participated at least once a month). The diversion rate from those households participating has been approximated at 12 - 14~. Total tons collected in fiscal year 90/91 are estimated to be 239.61. A portion of the source separation residents were asked to change their procedures and set their bins at the curb every other week (twice-monthly). The purpose of this test was to see if the participation rate and/or volume would change if residents were required to wait until they had a larger quantity. As stated earlier, final results will be forthcoming. Preliminary participation rates show a l0 - 12% 24 f ~~ plan will achieve 90$ service in budget year 1995. The overall financial impact of the curbside program is approximately $550,000 per year (with implementation dependent upon budgetary appropriations). The actual costs will be dependent upon the type of service (source separation vs. commingled) chosen. The cost to offer the rural service (and possibly modified glass collection) will be as follows: 1 - one ton pickup $20,000 2 - mobile trailers $32,000 ($16,000 each) 1 - one employee $22,000 There are many well documented positive environmental impacts associated with recycling, such as conservation of landfill space and energy resources. Roanoke County plans to fully study the environmental impact of all waste management alternatives implemented and comply with all local, state and federal policies and laws. Commercial Recycling Program The commercial/industrial sector constitutes nearly 46~ of the total waste stream going into the landfill. The main focus of the County commercial recycling plan has been to pinpoint what portion of the commercial waste stream as well as any commercial recycling activity that should be included in the Roanoke County totals. At the current time, commercial recycling makes up the bulk of the 7$ diversion rate claimed for the Valley, of which some percentage belongs to Roanoke County. There are several businesses located within County bounfdaries that currently have extensive recycling programs, such as the Kroger Company. In the attempt to tally only Roanoke County commercial waste, staff has begun accumulating data. Roanoke County currently has approximately 4,000 business licenses on file. The Commissioner of Revenue estimates that over half of those are operated out of the home. In those cases, the waste is counted as a part of the residential stream and they will be included as part of the curbside recycling program. The remaining businesses are serviced either through collection by private haulers, hauling it themselves, or returning waste as well as recyclable materials to home offices. The Virginia Employment Commission has approximately 1,300 businesses on file for Roanoke County. Roanoke City has nearly 3,400 businesses listed with the Commission. By that comparison the County has nearly 28~ of all businesses within its jurisdiction. Roanoke County has a three step approach to identifying the commercial waste stream. The first step will involve developing 26 GB ~(..~ Assembly has encouraged the locality to implement yard waste programs by giving them the authority to ban such materials from the landfills. The locality may prohibit the disposal of leaves and grass clippings after July 1, 1995 provided the municipality has developed a composting program capable of handling all such materials generated within its jurisdiction. Roanoke County has attempted to prevent brush materials from going into the landfill when equipment and personnel permit. Theoretically, there is a bulk/brush collection schedule under which this material is collected separately from the normal household trash. Under ideal situations, the brush is also collected separately from the bulk and taken to the landfill to be shredded for mulch. Often, the constraints of lack of equipment and personnel dictate that the bulk and brush be collected together which prevents the later separation for shredding. Less than 10~ of the trucks going into the landfill have been trucks filled solely with brush. At the present time, budgetary constraints prevent the implementation of a comprehensive yard waste program. Such a program would require the purchase of at least four knuckleboom vehicles @ $80,000 each. The knucklebooms would be necessary to hasten the process of collecting the brush/bulk separate from one another. The volume of brush precludes separate collection without automating the method. Additional replacement vehicles @ $100,000 each would be necessary for the collection of grass and leaves as well as there currently being no place to compost the grass. For the past two years, Roanoke County Solid Waste Division in conjunction with the Parks & Recreation Department has effectively prevented over 97% of the leaves from going into the landfill. All vacuumed leaves have either been given away to area farmers or taken to an alternate site for later use in the various parks. At all times these leaves are available for use by the citizens. The Solid Waste Division has been responsible for the collection of bagged leaves. During a two month period from mid- October to mid-December all bagged leaves have gone to the same alternate site. During the rest of the year the small percentage (3%) of bagged leaves collected go to the landfill. Four collection vehicles and at least twelve personnel were utilized to perform the bagged collection part of this program (the vacuum service was provided through the Parks and Recreation Department). Once the bagged leaves have been dumped in the alternate site, jail labor provided by the Sheriff's Department has been employed to debag. In the first year of operation, 808 tons of leaves were kept from the landfill. This past year saw an increase of 39% to 1,124 tons of leaves diverted. The current plan calls for the bagged leaf collection to continue as before at least for the next two to three years.- In the current budget cycle, the vacuum leaf service has been discontinued. A comprehensive change would occur 28 ~, ~ , ~.,. ~~ ~F~ attempted to use free publicity, such as news releases and community events to remind the participating neighborhoods of the program. In addition, County staff has on several occasions attended association groups to speak about the program. A more intensive approach was used in the commingle program due to the nature of the program. Residents had been programmed to believe that they must separate the materials in order for a program to work. Also a concerted effort was made to implant the once a month collection day in the resident's memory. A variety of stickers were affixed to the containers to remind the citizens what could/could not be recycled as well as to remind them of the collection day. In addition, both a brochure and a door knocker were included with the delivery of the container. Approximately one week before the scheduled collection day, letters addressing the most pertinent questions the staff had received, additional stickers, an explanatory brochure, and a kitchen magnet advertising the collection day were mailed to all participants in the program. An intensive effort was made to get the media interested in the program and a variety of coverage resulted that included radio, television and print coverage. This type of educational/promotional program has proven to be successful and will be followed in the future expansion of the curbside program. There are other elements that will be incorporated as the program expands to a wider participating audience. A program appointing block or area captains will be initiated so that residents will have a convenient champion of recycling close by. County staff plans to begin releasing a newsletter that trumpets the great strides the County has made in improving the environment. There are a wide variety of other promotional tools that can be introduced at a later date to include posters, stickers, contests and manuals. Staff is currently in the process of developing a guide to aid in the management of yard waste, specifically to encourage backyard composting and leaving the grass clippings on the lawn. The Clean Valley Council has performed valuable work in the publicity/promotional sector and will continue to do so in the future. County staff has relied on the Council a great deal for information. In addition, Clean Valley Council staff does a tremendous amount of the public speaking engagements educating the public about recycling in general, as well as the County program. The Council also performs an invaluable service by providing an environmental educator to speak at schools. The Council has developed an entire curriculum dealing with waste management issues and will present it to any interested school system. All recycling programs that have captured the interest of the school age children in the home have a much better chance of succeeding. Listed below is a brief synopsis-of all CVC activities available. 30 ~~ ~9 CVC offers educational services related to recycling and litter control. Target audiences often include the general public, the schools, and businesses. These services are described below. General Public• • Speaking engagements: offered to civic groups, church groups, clubs, youth organizations, senior citizen groups, and/or professional meetings on a by-request basis. • Distribution of materials by direct request: brochures on a variety of subjects related to waste minimization and recycling may be obtained by calling or writing the CVC office. • Participation at special events: CVC can provide a visual display for festivals, trade shows, etc., accompanied by staff to distribute materials and answer questions. Area Schools• • Elementary: grade-specific programs featuring videos and/or hands-on activities are scheduled by each school's principal. Every school is mailed a detailed description of these programs at the beginning of the year. • Middle/high school: Programs are scheduled at the request of individual teachers or club sponsors and are developed to complement current areas of study/interest. • Colleges: lectures designed to provide in-depth information on subjects related to a specific course of study are available on an individualized basis (example: "Recycling in the restaurant or hotel business"). • School-wide assemblies/programs: programs appropriate to any grade level for special presentations to large groups. • School boards, PTA's, etc.: CVC staff is available to serve as members of recycling committees and/or to present programs to these organizations on an on-going or interim basis. Business or Industry: • Telephone consultations: provide businesses with information on local resources available for setting up recycling programs. 31 ~`~~ Roanoke County has no plans in the next five years to implement incineration as a waste disposal method. It can therefore have no economic or environmental impact. Incineration will be reviewed as a solid waste management alternative at each five year plan update period. Landfills Landfills are the most common method of waste disposal in the Commonwealth of Virginia and are the primary method of waste disposal by the County of Roanoke. Landfilling is the final segment of the waste management hierarchy and any comprehensive waste management plan must detail the use of landfills in the disposal of waste. There are two landfills involved in the disposal of Roanoke County's waste during the next five years (and next 20 years). Therefore this section will detail both the current Roanoke Regional Landfill and the proposed Smith Gap Landfill in an attempt to describe the landfilling segment of the hierarchy. The Roanoke Regional Landfill is located in the Southeastern corner of Roanoke County, 1212 Rutrough Road and is operating on a 290 acre site. There are some 90 acres of fillable land with the remainder being utilized as buffer zones or other non-landfillable uses. As of spring 1991, five of seven planned sections have been filled and closed. One section is operational and the seventh section has been withheld from development. The closure plan for the current will be submitted as required by State date is January 1, 1994 and the approximately six months prior to that. Roanoke Regional Landfill regulations. The closing actual last date-of-use The Smith Gap Landfill will be located in a northern-central part of the County in a geographic section of the County that is best described as mountainous and rural. At present there are no major state highways that directly access the site. The County plan is to build a small administrative road to the site to provide access for employees of the landfill, administrative traffic, and visitor access. The actual transport of waste to the landfill is being studied by both rail and road. The transfer station will be centrally located and will provide for basic processing of waste materials in preparation for transport to the landfill. Approximately 8 - 10 acres will be used for the station, and the station will be capable of processing 1,000 tons of waste per day. The transfer station will have an extensive system of waste separation activities to include brush, materials recycling, contractor debris, white goods (refrigerators, stoves, etc.). 33 i>' 1 ~~ v APPENDI% A Stages of Accomplishment 35 ~~~~ STAGES OF ACCOMPLISHMENT Phase I Curbside program began in 1987, approximatley 1,000 homes participated in the pilot. Program was expanded in 1989 when 900 homes were added. Funding was a joint effort between Roanoke County, Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems Inc., and Division of Mines, Minerals and Energy. Phase II Began taking recycle vehicle to various locations to serve as drop- off center. Permanent drop-offs located at Cave Spring Corners in Roanoke County. 1989 began program to attempt total diversion of leaves and Christmas trees from landfill. Funding covered under current budget appropriations. In 1990 new pilot automated commingle recycling program began in nearly 1,700 homes. Funding was a joint effort between Roanoke County and Regional Landfill Board. Phase III Implement aggressive program to incorporate commercial/business sector into County plan. Develop reporting requirements for businesses to detail recyclable materials and non-recyclable waste. Continue present curbside collection of recyclable materials (in pilot areas), leaves and Christmas trees. Continue pesent drop- off system. Funding of operations to be covered under general fund monies as well as any grant monies available. Phase IV Gradual implementation of curbside collection of recyclable materials to approximately 90~ of County residents. (Approx. 23,000 residents). Exact costs will be determined by method of collection chosen. Implement mobile drop-off system to cover remainder of County. (Costs covered in plan). 36 F Implement completely separate collection of all yard waste materials to divert from landfill. Implement completely separate collection of all white goods to divert from landfill. Funding of operations will be allocated from the General Fund and will be done under a schedule devised by the budget process. By 1991 Improved reporting of business recycling Current curbside collection Current diversion of leaves and Christmas trees Current drop-off system (mobile & Kroger) 1993 More involved commercial/business sector ~ increase in curbside participants Phased in yard waste program Drop-off program By 1995 Completely involved commercial/business sector ~ increase in curbside participants Yard waste program Drop-off program Note: 10$ 15~ 25$ These goals are minimum required. Staff feels that very aggressive commercial/business program will achieve even higher diversion rates. 37 r APPENDI% B Roanoke County Enacted Ordinances 38 ~~ PROPOSED ORDINANCE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 17-_ PROVIDING FOR A PREFERENCE FOR THE PURCHASE OF RECYCLED PAPER OR PAPER PRODUCTS WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is the promotion of governmental utilization of recycled paper and paper products; and WHEREAS, § § 11-47.2 and 15.1-11.5:01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, specifically authorizes this action; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991; and the second reading was held on June 11, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 17, "Procurement" of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the addition of a new section 17- as follows: Sec. 17- Recycled paper and paper products. a. "Recycled paper and paper products" means any paper and paper products meeting the EPA Recommended Content Standards as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 250. b. In determining the award of any contract for paper or paper products to be purchased for use by any division, department, or agency of the County of Roanoke, the purchasing agent for the County of Roanoke shall use competitive sealed bidding and shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder offering recycled paper or paper products of a quality suitable for the 39 r purpose intended, so long as the bid price is not more than ten (10~) percent greater than the bid price of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder offering a product that does not qualify as recycled paper and paper products under this ordinance. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. 40 r ' (, 915 PROPOSED ORDINANCED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, "SOLID WASTE," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW ARTICLE III, "RECYCLING," BY PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN RECYCLING REPORTS WHEREAS, House Bill 543 and Senate Bill 447 of the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly allow counties to require solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials to annually report solid waste information necessary to facilitate compliance with state regulations, and WHEREAS, non-residential entities dispose of more than 40% of the waste going into the regional landfill; and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate compliance with the state- mandated recycling goals, localities must be able to obtain any and all information pertaining to solid waste generation, management and recycling; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to further the Solid Waste Management Activities of the County of Roanoke and specifically the recycling of solid waste as provided for in Section 15.1-11.5:2 and Section 10.1-1411 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held June 11, 1991; and the second reading was held June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 41 r 1. That Chapter 20, "Solid Waste," of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the addition of a new Article III entitled "Recycling" as follows: Article III. Recycling Section 20-40. Recycling Reports. 1. Definitions. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces solid waste as defined herein. Manacte means to collect, store, treat, transport, and dispose of solid waste as defined herein. Reused means once having been a waste and being: (1) employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or (2) employed in a particular function or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resource. Recycling means the process of separating a given waste material from the waste stream and processing it so that it is used again as a raw material for a product, which may or may not be similar to the original product. Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous. material, resulting from industrial, commercial, residential, mining, and agricultural operations, or community activities, but does not include: (1) solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, ,, 4 2 ¢~ ~ ~., '~ ~ ~ ~ •~ (2) solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows in industrial discharges which resources subject to a permit from the State Water Control Board, or (3) source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Source reduction means any action that reduces or eliminates the generation of waste at the source, usually within a process. Source reduction measures include among others, process modifications, feedstock substitutions, improvements in feedstock purity, improvements in housekeeping and management practices, increases in the efficiency of machinery, and recycling within a process. Principle recyclable materials means newspaper, ferrous scrap metals, non-ferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, kraft paper, container glass, aluminum, high grade office paper, tin cans, cloth, automobile bodies, plastic, clean wood, brush, leaves, grass, and arboreal materials. 2. Report Requirement. All non-residential solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials generated within Roanoke County shall submit an annual report to Roanoke County. The County will provide official reporting forms which can be obtained from the Solid Waste Office or the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Report must be submitted to the Department of General Services - Solid Waste Division by December 31 of the current reporting year. ,. 4 3 ~~ 3. Report Substance. Each annual report required to be submitted hereunder shall include the following information with respect to the reporting party for the period covered by the report: (1) the name and address of the reporting party; (2) the total quantity of solid waste (a) generated, (b) managed, and (c) recycled by the reporting party during the reporting period; and (3) the total quantity or volume of solid waste that has been the subject of source reduction or reuse as defined herein. 4. Report Basis. Any report required under this section shall be based on actual volume or weight. Where actual volume or weight cannot be accurately determined, the volume or weight may be reported using carefully estimated data. Any such report shall include a description of the basis for the reported data. 5. Proprietary Protection. Nothing hereunder shall be construed to require any party to report information of a proprietary nature. Where any party fails to report any information otherwise required hereunder based upon a determination that such information is of a proprietary nature, the party shall specify in its report the nature of the information withheld and the basis for its determination that such information is of a proprietary nature. 6. Local Generation. The report shall include only those solid wastes generated within Roanoke County both in terms of recycled material and ,, 4 4 .~ ~' material disposed of in the landfill. 7. Civil Penalties. Any party not reporting the required information or otherwise not complying with the provisions of this ordinance could be subject to a civil fine not to exceed $100.00. In addition, any party not in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance could be denied access to or use of the solid waste disposal facility serving Roanoke County. 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. r 45 - ~~~ APPENDIX C Requirement Checklist 46 ~ ~ p..,,, ~A ~f,~~ REGULATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS CHECK LIST 4.1 GENERAL PLAN PAGE # 1) Consideration of hierarchy 2) Demonstrate 3.2 B recycling rates 3) Include copy of local resolution 4) Virginia Development Act 4.2 - INCORPORATED DATA: 1) Demographic & population 20 yr. projection 2) * Urban concentrations * Geographic conditions * Markets * Transportation conditions * Related factors 3) Estimates of solid waste generation: * Households * Commercial Institutions * Industry * Other 4) List of all waste management facilities 5) Plan implementation milestones, 20 years 6) Programs 7) Outreach programs 8) Evaluating collection systems 4.3 - ASSESSMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT NEEDS: 1) * Waste management needs, for 20 years * Action to be taken to meet needs 4.4 - ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES: r 47 x,~ ,~ ~,~ 1) Mandatory objectives (3.2) 2) Hierarchy (2.2) 3) Environmental Compatibility 4) Economic Growth 5) Waste Collection OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE REOOIRED 3.2 - MANDATORY PLAN OBJECTIVES A) The Solid Waste PLan shall include: 1. Integrated strategy 2. Objectives 3. Stages towards accomplishment 4. Funding and resources necessary 5. Strategy for funding and resources 6. Public education and information 7. Private sector participation 3.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: A) Record of public hearing and comments B) Citizen advisory committees * 4g A~ ~~ APPENDIX D Roanoke County Schools Recycling Activities 49 -~.~ ROANORE COIINTY SCHOOLS RECYCLING ACTIVITIES In accordance with 1990 legislation (SB 287, HJR 158, HJR 153), each agency, university and public school must implement new solid waste management programs. Specifically the school system must do the following: 1) Recycle (at a minimum) office paper, cardboard, glass aluminum and used motor oil. Other materials include newspaper, metal, plastic, bi-metal cans, yard or arboreal waste and used vehicle tires, batteries and antifreeze. 2) Document the amount of waste generated and the amount recycled. 3) Promote procurement of products made partially or fully of recycled raw materials. 4) Minimize the amount of waste generated. 5) Develop plans and implement procedures for achieving above. Roanoke County School System has implemented. several phases of the requirements as set forth by the state. An employee of the school system has been given the mission of developing and overseeing the recycling activities. The school board has commissioned an advisory committee to help develop and implement various solid waste strategies. Below is a brief overview of some of the strategies the schools have already implemented: Schools have changed from fan fold towels to roll-out towels. Schools have also converted to large roll tissue dispensers. Both of which reduce usage and waste. The schools have started developing a special environmental curriculum in conjunction with the Clean Valley Council. As a result of this area of study some schools have implemented in-school recycling programs (usually to separate paper products). Several of the schools have very active science clubs which often spearhead recycling efforts. Administration plans to encourage this type of activity. Each school has been instructed to appoint a recycling liaison whose main functions will be to supervise recycling at their individual schools and report to the advisory committee on progress. Polystyrene recycling has been implemented in several pilot schools. In these schools, the polystryrene dishes r 50 .~ , .~~~~~ will be collected and taken to a densifier, supplied by the Dart Container Corp. , to be baled. A truck from Dart will collect the densified plastic and take it to a plant in Pennsylvania to be processed. Another project being tested is the use of plastic milk pouches instead of cartons. Roanoke County school staff is currently looking for someone to recycle the pouches; nevertheless, the pouches do take up less room in the landfill than cartons would. ,, 51 ~.. k~ byN APPENDI% E Citizen Advisory Committee Summary 52 ROANORE COUNTY CITIZEN ADVISORY RECYCLING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Ellen Aiken, Executive Director, Clean Valley Council James A. Connor, Controller, Cycle Systems, Inc.(County Business) Homer Duff, Director of Facilities, Roanoke County Schools Lee B. Eddy, Member Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Marielayna Rossillo, Citizen Appointed to Committee Gardner W. Smith, Director of General Services, Roanoke County Mikeiel Wimmer, Citizen Appointed to Committee April Yow, Property Manager, Edinburgh Square Foundation (County Business) County Staff: Nancy Bailey, Coordinator, Solid Waste Division, Roanoke County In the regulations set forth by the Department of Waste Management, citizen participation in the development of the comprehensive solid waste plan is strongly recommended. In choosing to appoint a committee the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors endorsed this concept (see attached Board report). Committee input has been a successful technique for county staff in the past when projects have affected both private and commercial concerns. In the initial meetings, the committee developed its own scope, goals and objectives. Below are a list of issues prioritized by committee members: County Achievement of State Mandated Goals Comprehensive Recycling Plan County Policy/Ordinance: Mandatory vs. Other Commercial Recycling: Education and Recognition Recycling Activity Reporting Source Reduction The committee has in recent meetings been reviewing and commenting on the County's comprehensive Solid Waste Plan. The committee then plans to turn its attention to developing methods to obtain the necessary information from the commercial sector, as well as methods to encourage the commercial sector to implement recycling activities. ,, 5 3 ~e. APPENDIB F Public Hearinq Minutes and Comments 54 +~; ~' APPENDI% G Definitions 55 <~" DEFINITIONS Abandoned material. Means any material that is disposed of; burned or incinerated; or accumulated, stored, or treated (but not recycled) before or instead of being abandoned by being disposed of, burned, or incinerated. Abatement. The reduction in landfill pollution by source reduction and waste recycling. Aluminum. A ductile, silvery-white metallic element. Its symbol is A1. At-the-desk separation. The sorting and storage of recyclable office papers on or beside the employee's desk. Automated Recycling Program. The collection of recyclable materials at the curb utilizing the automated equipment. Automation, or Automated Refuse Collection System. A method of collection utilizing a vehicle equipped with a hydraulic arm that empties specially provided containers. The system requires only one operator and does not require manual handling of the garbage, Avoided costs. Solid waste management cost savings resulting from a recycling program. One cost saving can be avoided - disposal fees. Another avoided cost can be the saving in garbage collection costs through rerouting and extended truck life Backyard composting. The controlled biodegradation of leaves, grass clippings, and/or other yard wastes on the site where they were generated. Bi-metal can. A beverage container with a steel body and aluminum top. Biodegradable. Organic materials capable of being converted into basic compounds or elements by bacteria. Biweekly service. Generally used, every-other week service. Less commonly used, it means twice-per-month service. Block-leader promotion. The use of volunteers to promote recycling collection service in a specific block or neighborhood. Board. Means the Virginia Waste Management Board. Board of supervisors. An elected body of Roanoke County citizens that develop ptilicy and pass ordinances directing County government. Broker. A firm that purchases secondary materials from processors for resale to consumers, acting as an intermediary in the marketplace. A broker typically does not take physical possession of the secondary materials. " 56 F ~~ ~ Brush Collection. Roanoke County curbside collection of brush, tree limbs, and other arboreal materials. Brush collection DOES NOT include tree limbs exceeding 10 feet in length and 3 inches in diameter. Brush/Bulk Collection. The County program which provides bulk waste pickup of appliances, furniture, brush, tree limbs, and other heavy items as deemed collectible by the County. Please see BRIISH COLLECTION and BIILR COLLECTION. Buffer Zone. Space or distance between a composting or recycling operation and sensitive land areas, such as residential neighborhoods. Bulk Collection. Roanoke County curbside collection of appliances, furniture, and other white goods. Bulk collection DOES NOT include construction material from contracted jobs. Buy-back recycling center. A commercially located, staffed recycling facility that purchase small amounts of post-consumer secondary materials from the public. Buy-back centers typically purchase aluminum cans and may also handle glass containers and newspaper. Little processing of materials occurs at buy-back centers. Capacity. A measure of the maximum output under normal operating condition. Capital costs. Outlays for real property, plant, equipment, and other depreciable investments. Capture rate. The percent of generated secondary materials actually recovered from a household or business. Cardboard box. Generic term for old corrugated containers. Chipper. A device using sharp blades attached to a rotating shaft to shave off pieces of an item. Citizen Advisory Committee, or Citizen Advisory Group. A group formed to provide input on the comprehensive solid waste plan being developed by the County. The specific goal of the committee would be to aid in formulating recycling policy. Civil Penalty. Article 8, Section. 10.1-455 Virginia Waste Management Act provides that any person who violates any provision of said Act, any condition of a permit or certification, or any regulation or order of the Board shall, upon such finding by an appropriate circuit court be assessed a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for~each day of such violation(such penalties shall be $25,000 beginning July 1, 1990), and any person willfully violating or refusing, failing or neglecting to comply with any regulation or order of the Board or the Director shall be guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor, unless a different penalty is specified. Clean Valley Council. A local agency serving the Roanoke Regional area for that specializes in the formulation and dessimination of 57 ~, '~' ~ '~' information pertaining to recycling education, recycling activities, environmental curriculums, and administering of the litter control grants. Collection center. A site designed to accept secondary materials from individuals. See drop-off recycling center. Collection frequency. The schedule for recycling collection service (e.g., weekly, biweekly, monthly, etc.). Commercial waste. Means all solid waste generated by establishments engaged in business operations other than manufacturing. This category includes, but is not limited to, solid waste resulting from the operation of stores, markets, office building, restaurants, and shopping centers. Commercial Waste Audit. A systematic accounting of the materials input and product/waste output that identifies procedures with potential for waste reduction or recycling. The Commercial Waste Audit identifies quantities of raw materials, composition of waste and percentage of recyclable materials and the point of contamination of potentially recyclable materials. Commingled collection. The pick up of several recyclable materials mixed together. Commingle Recycling Program. A method of collection recyclable materials that have been placed to the curb or street mixed together. The separation process occurs at a central processing location as opposed to at the source. Compactor. Apower-driven device used to compress and reduce the volume of wastes or secondary materials. Compost. As a noun, the humus-like organic product generated from composting. As a verb, to decay. Composting. The microbial degradation of organic matter into a useful product. Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. A Plan developed by the Roanoke County Solid Waste Division which sets forth the County's expectations for implementing an integrated approach toward county-wide solid waste management. Construction/Demolition/Debris landfill.. Means a land burial facility engineered constructed, and operated to contain and isolate construction waste, demolition waste, debris waste, inert waste, or combinations of the above solid wastes. Construction and demolition waste. Waste material produced in the construction, remodeling, repair, or demolition of buildings, homes, industrial plants, pavements, and structures. Construction Waste. Means solid waste which is produced or generated during construction of structures. Construction waste 58 consists of lumber, wire, sheetrock, broken brick, shingles, glass, pipes, concrete, and metal and plastics if they are part of the construction material or are empty containers for such materials. Paints, coatings, solvents, asbestos, compressed gases, liquids or semi-liquids, and garbage are not construction wastes. Consumer. See end user. Consumption. The amount of any resource or energy used in a given time by a given number of people. Contaminant. A material that is harmful to the recycling process when included with a recyclable material. Called contraries in some countries. Contamination. Means the degradation in quality of naturally occurring water, air, or soil resulting either directly or indirectly from human activity. Cradle-to-grave. A system that handles solid waste from creation through disposal. Crusher. A mechanical device used to break secondary materials such as glass bottles into smaller pieces. Gullet. Broken scrap glass material, usually prepared in uniform, small pieces. See also container cullet. Cultivation. In composting, accelerating the decomposition of biodegradable wastes by turning, watering, aerating, loosening and/or inoculating the waste with micro-organisms or fertilizer to lower the carbon/nitrogen ratio. Curbside Collection. Means the collection of materials that have been set to the curb or street. Curbside recycling. The generic term for scheduled recycling collection service to households. Some curbside recycling collection programs collect from alleys. Typically, curbside recycling does not refer to service to multi-family dwellings. Curbside Recycling Program. Means the collection of recyclable materials that have been set to the curb or street. Dealer. A firm that purchases, grades and processes waste paper or scrap metals for sale to brokers and/or end users. Debris waste. Means stumps, wood, brush, and leaves from land clearing operations. Demolition waste. Means solid waste produced by destruction of structures and their foundations and includes the same materials as construction wastes. Director. Means the Director of the Department of Waste Management. * 59 " ~~ Discarded material. Means a material which is abandoned material as defined in this part, recycled material as defined in this part, or considered inherently waste-like. Disposal. Means the discharge, deposit, injection, dumping, spilling, leaking or placing of any solid waste into or on any land or water so that such solid waste or any constituent thereof may enter the environment or be emitted into the air or discharged into any waters. Disposal cost savings. Savings of reduced waste hauling requirements, avoided tipping fees, and other operational cost savings related to waste disposal because of the operation of a recycling program. Diversion credit. See waste diversion credit. Diversion rate. The amount of municipal solid waste diverted from disposal through reduction, reuse, and recycling efforts. Do-it-yourself used oil changer. An individual who removes used, motor oil from an automobile, truck, boat, etc. Door hanger. A printed card, distributed to households and hung on a door, promoting a recycling service. Drivebys. The number of households or businesses on a specific recycling collection route(s). This is the theoretical service population, given participation by all potential households or businesses. Drop-off center. A recycling collection location where citizens can deliver separated secondary materials, such as newspapers, glass containers and metal cans. The typical center is unattended. Durable. Lasting in spite of use. Durable goods. Products designed for long-term use, such as furniture, tires, and appliances. End user. Mills and other industrial facilities where secondary materials are converted into new materials. Paper mills, steel mills, and glass container production plants are examples of end users. EPA. An acronym for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Facility. Means solid waste management facility unless the context indicates otherwise. Ferrous. Pertaining to or derived from iron. Most ferrous metals are magnetic. 60 F .,,` Fifth Planning District Commission(Fifth PDC). A regional planning commission consisting of representatives from nine municipalities. These municipalities include the Cities of Roanoke, Clifton Forge, Covington and Salem, as well as the Counties of Roanoke, Botetourt, Craig, Alleghany, and the Town of Vinton. Free Loader. A 14' x 8' x 4', 5-ton trailer which may be reserved by Roanoke County residents for one weekday or one weekend. The Free Loader holds 10,000 pounds of trash. Fully allocated costs. The assignment of all known costs of recycling to the program, including the portion of costs shared with other operations or programs. Garbage. 1) Discarded food wastes. 2) Wastes likely to decompose. Generate. To originate or produce. Generator. An individual, company, organization, or activity that produces wastes or secondary materials. Glass. An inorganic product resulting from fusion that has cooled to a rigid condition without crystallizing. For precision, the term "glass" should not be used alone, as there are numerous glass products, such as glass containers, flat glass, and glass tableware. Glass containers. Glass bottles and jars used to package food, beer, liquor, wine, juice, soft drinks, medicine, toiletries, and chemicals. Gooseneck trailer. A trailer attached to a truck using a slender, curved gooseneck hitch. Grade. A class of secondary material that is distinguished from similar classes on the basis of quality, color, use, content, appearance, density, or other factors. Grades of recyclable materials can be determined informally as part of common industry practices or officially as part of a trade association or governmental effort. Gross ton. A measure of weight equal to 1.016 metric tons or 2,240 pounds. Also called long ton. See net ton. Groundcover. Material used to cover the soil surface to control erosion and leaching, shade the ground, and offer protection from excessive heaving and freezing. Some ground covers are produced from yard waste compost. Groundwater. Means any water, except capillary moisture or unsaturated zone moisture, beneath the land surface in the zone of 61 r r` ,, b. saturation or beneath the bed of any stream, lake, reservoir or other body of surface water within the boundaries of this Commonwealth, whatever may be the subsurface geologic structure in which such water stands, flows, or otherwise-occurs. n Hazardous waste. Means a hazardous waste" as defined by the Virginia Hazardous Management Waste Rectulation. HDPE. An acronym for high density polyethylene plastic. See polyethylenes. Heavy metals. Metals such as cadmium, lead, and mercury that are persistent in the environment and are poisonous. Hierarchy. The seven elements that make up the Virginia Waste Management Board's integrated approach to comprehensive waste management programs. These elements include, in order of consideration, planning, source reduction, reuse, recycling, resource recovery waste to energy), incineration volume reduction), and landfilling. Household separation unit. See household storage. Household storage container. A small bin, tub, pail, or box provided to residents for use in storing secondary materials and for carrying them to the curb for collection. Household waste. Means any waste material, including garbage, trash and refuse, derived from households. Households include single and multiple residences, hotels and motels, bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew quarters, campgrounds, picnic grounds, and day-use recreation areas. Humus. The organic portion of soil created by the partial decomposition of organic matter. Yard waste composting can create humus. Hydraulic. Moved or operated by fluid under pressure. Illegal disposal. Means disposal which is contrary to applicable law or regulations. Incineration. Means the controlled combustion of solid waste for disposal. Incinerator. Means a facility or device designed for the treatment for volume reduction of solid waste by combustion. Incremental costs. See partially allocated costs. Industrial waste. Means any or industrial process that This term does not include solid waste generated by manufacturing is not a regulated hazardous waste. mining waste or oid and gas waste. 62 r ~, ,..nr Industrial waste landfill. Means a solid waste landfill used primarily for the disposal of a specific industrial waste or a waste which is a by-product of a production process. Inorganic. Not composed of once-living material. Minerals are inorganic substances. Institutional solid wastes. Solid wastes generated by schools, hospitals, universities, museums, governments, and other institutions. Some communities define institutional solid wastes as commercial solid wastes. Institutional solid wastes are one portion of municipal solid wastes. Integrated waste management plan. Means a governmental plan that considers all elements of waste management during generation, collection, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal and selects the appropriate methods of providing necessary control and services for effective and efficient management of all wastes. An "integrated waste management plan" must provide for source reduction, reuse, and recycling within the jurisdiction and the proper funding and management of waste management programs. Intensive recycling. A concept promoted by opponents of waste-to- energy systems, whereby municipal recycling efforts target all recyclables in the waste stream. Intermediate processing center. 1) A term commonly used for a facility that separates mixed glass and metal containers and processes the materials for sale to end users. Also called a materials recovery facility or materials recycling facility. 2) A firm that purchases, processes, and markets source-separated materials. For instance, under this definition a waste paper dealer would be an intermediate processor. An acronym is IPC. Investment tax credit. A reduction in taxes permitted for the purchase and installation of specific types of equipment and other investments. Junk. As-generated secondary materials. Jurisdiction. Means a local governing body; city, county, or town; or any independent entity, such as a federal or state agency, which join with local governing bodies to develop a waste management plan. Landfill. Means a sanitary landfill, an industrial waste landfill, or a construction/demolition/debris landfill. Landfillinq. The method of burying solid waste in the earth. Large diameter tree stumps. Means tree stumps too large to be chipped or processed using available technology. 63 ~' . ;. Leachate. Liquid that has passed through, been in contact with, or produced in a landfill or compost pile. Leaf ate. A term used by some yard waste composting professionals for the leachate from leaf piles. Lifecycle value. The value of an asset in terms of its operating life. Loam. A mixture of silt, sand, or clay, or a combination of any of these, with humus. See humus. Mandatory recycling. Programs requiring by ordinance or statute that residents or businesses keep specific secondary materials from their solid wastes and prepare the materials for recycling. Manual Collection. The collection of waste materials at the curb by solid waste personnel as opposed to mechanical equipment. Market. A firm or operation purchasing secondary materials. The term of reference may vary. For instance, a processor is considered a market for a collector while an end user is considered a market of processors. Materials recovery facility or materials recycling facility. A common acronym is MRF. See intermediate processing center. Material specifications. See specifications. Metals. All ferrous, non-ferrous, and alloy materials. Mixed waste paper. A mixture of various grades of recyclable waste paper not limited by packing or fiber content. Moisture content. The weight loss in percent when a material is dried. M3W. An acronym for municipal solid waste. Mulch. An organic product, produced from the yard waste composting process, for placement on the soil or lawn to improve growing conditions, retain soil moisture, and supply minimal levels of nutrients. Multi-material. A collection or processing system handling more than one secondary material. For example, a drop-off center accepting newspaper and aluminum cans is considered a multi- material operation. Municipal solid waste. Wastes generated by residents, businesses, and institutions. The acronym MSW is commonly used. Natural resources. The supply of materials, not made by man, that are used for making goods. Also called raw, primary, or virgin 64 ~ Y ,F ~ + t .~ materials. Net ton. 2,000 pounds. Also called short ton. See gross ton. Newsprint. The type of paper generally used for printing newspapers. Non-ferrous scrap metals. Metals which contain no iron. Non-household waste or Noa-household solid waste. Means any solid waste that is not defined as "household waste". Obsolescence. The process of becoming useless. Obsolete scrap. A term used in the ferrous scrap processing industry for products which have completed their useful economic life. Office paper. Secondary fibers produced by office workers, including ledger, computer, and bond papers. Old corrugated containers. As a paper stock grade, baled, corrugated containers having liners of test liner, jute, or kraft. The boxes are generated in retail stores, factories, and homes when merchandise is removed from them. A common acronym is OCC. Old newspapers. As a paper stock grade, baled printed newspapers (containing less than 5 percent of other grades) that have been distributed to readers and are available for recycling. A common acronyia is ONP. One-Arm Bandit. A refuse vehicle equipped with a mechanical arm. This vehicle allows automated collection. Open dump. Means a site on which any solid waste is placed, discharged, deposited, injected, dumped, or spilled so as to create a nuisance or so as to pose within the determination of the Director a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment, including the pollution of air, land, surface water, or groundwater. For further detail see the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations. Operating costs. Recurring program costs, such as labor, equipment operation and maintenance, utilities, administration, and promotion. Ordinance. A local government statute. Organic. Living•or once-living material. Packer. A solid waste collection vehicle employing a compaction mechanism. 65 r S~µ~ ~ lei±~. Paper. A type of matted ar sheeted fibrous product. In common terms, paper is distinguished from paperboard by being lighter, thinner, and more flexible. See also specialty products. Partially allocated costs. The costs of adding a recycling program to an existing operation such as a waste hauling company or public works department. Also known as incremental costs. Participation rate. The percentage of households and/or businesses actually participating in a recycling program. Passbys. The total number of potential participants on a residential recycling collection route. PE. An acronym for polyethylene. See polyethylenes. Permit. Means the written permission of the Director to own, operate, or construct a solid waste management facility. PET. An acronym for polyethylene terephthalate. Planning. The process of developing integrative and comprehensive, strategies that will describe how a local government and the community it services will work together to meet the recycling goals of 10$ by 1991, 15~ by 1993, and 25~ by 1995. Plastic. A specific polymer in combination with various amounts of plasticisers, stabilizers, colorants, fillers, and other organic and inorganic compounds. Polyethylene terephthalate. A lightweight, transparent, rigid polymer resistant to chemical and moisture and with good insulating properties ( usually the soda/drink bottle containters). Polystryrene. A hard, dimensionally stable thermoplastic that is easily molded. PS is a common acronym. Post-consumer waste. A discard generated by a business or residence and that has fulfilled its useful life. Post-consumer waste does not include discards from industrial and manufacturing processes. Primary materials. See natural resources. Principal Recyclable Materials. Materials eligible for recycling, as defined in the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Waste Management Regulations for solid waste management plans. Principle Recyclable Materials include newspaper, ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metals, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, kraft paper, container glass, aluminum, high-grade office paper, tin cans, cloth, automobile bodies, certain plastics, clean wood, brush, leaves, grass and other arboreal materials. 66 Processor. A recycling operation where secondary materials are sorted, graded, cleaned, densified, or packaged. Included are scrap metal yards and waste paper dealers. Prohibitive material. 1) Any material included in paper stock, in excess of the amount allowed, which will make the paper stock shipment unusable at the grade specified. 2) Any materials that may be damaging to recycling equipment. Public Education. The process of generating information for the public about recycling and other waste management alternatives, as well as creating public support for these alternatives. Public Participation. The process of extensive public information, and public education to help make the general populace aware of the solid waste management hierarchy, and the vital role of the public in making any waste management plan a success. Raw materials. See natural resources. Recovered material. Material which has been diverted from solid waste, but not including material generated from and commonly reused within an original manufacturing process ( see broke and home , scrap) . Recovery rate. The total amount of solid waste recovered through source reduction, reuse and recycling in a given community. Commonly, the recovery rate is expressed as a percent of solid waste generation. Recyclable. When commonly used, refers to the technical ability of a material to be reused in manufacture. A more precise definition incorporates requirements that a recycling collection, processing, and market system be in place and economically functioning in order for a material to be recyclable. Using this definition, many materials are technically capable of being recycled but are not considered recyclable due to the lack of a viable recovery system. Recycle, or Recycling. The process of separating a given waste material from the waste stream, and processing it so that it is used again as a raw material for a product, which may or may not be similar to the original product. Recycling includes the participative stage of source separation, as well as the methods of collection and distribution of recyclable materials to recycling centers. Recycling also includes any program that aids in the separation, collection and processing of eligible materials. Recycling Center. An agency that deals in principal recyclable materials, purchasing these items for current market prices, and selling them to available markets. Recycling efficiency. The likelihood a recycling program participant will prepare a specific material for recycling. 67 r ~"~ ... Recycling processor. A generic term for businesses and operations that prepare secondary materials for sale to end users. Waste paper dealers, scrap metal yards, drop-off centers, and buy-back centers are examples of recycling processors. Reduction. To diminish the amount of solid waste destined for disposal. Refuse. Means all solid waste products having the characters of solids rather than liquids and which are composed wholly or partially of materials such as garbage, trash, rubbish, litter, residues from clean up of spills or contamination, or other discarded materials. Reporting Requirement. An annual reporting of waste generation, as well as any recycling activity by commercial businesses and private waste haulers. Residential solid waste. Solid waste generated from housing structures. An acronym is RSW. Resource recovery. Means a solid waste management system which provides for collection, separation, recycling, and recovery of energy or solid wastes, including disposal of non-recoverable waste residues. Reuse. A waste reduction strategy where a product is used for the same or new purpose without undergoing a physical change. Reused. Means having once been a waste and being employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or employed in a particular function or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resources. sanitary landfill. Means an engineered land burial facility for the disposal of solid waste which is so located, designed, constructed and operated to contain and isolate the solid waste so that it does not pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment. Scrap metal. Means bits and pieces of metal parts such as bars, rods, wire, or metal pieces that may be. combined together with bolts or soldering which are discarded material and can be recycled. secondary material. Recyclable materials, such as waste paper and scrap metals. Self haulers. Residents and businesses that haul their own solid wastes to transfer or disposal sites. 68 r *` Set out. 1) The amount material (weight or volume) put out for recycling collection by a participant. 2) The act of placing recyclables at the curb for collection. 3) A single incidence of participation in recycling collection. See stop. Shredder. A mechanical device that tears or grinds material to reduce it in size. Site. Means all land and structures, other appurtenances, and improvements thereon used for treating, storing, and disposing of solid waste. This term includes adjacent land within the property boundary used for the utility systems such as repair, storage, shipping or processing areas, or other areas incident to the management of solid waste. (Note: This term includes all sites whether they are planned and managed facilities or open dumps.) Solid waste. Means any garbage, refuse, sludge, and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid or contained gaseous material, resulting from industrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations, or community activities, but does not include solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage; solid or, dissolved material in irrigation return flows or in industrial discharges which are sources subject to a permit from the roduct Water Control Board; or source, special nuclear, or byp material as defined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. As used in these regulations, solid waste does not include hazardous wastes as defined in the Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations. solid waste disposal facility. Means a solid waste management facility at which solid waste will remain after closure. Solid waste management facility ("SWMF")• -Means a site used for planned treating, storing, or disposing of solid waste. A facility may consist of several treatment, storage, or disposal units. Source reduction. Means any action that reduces or eliminates the generation of waste at the source, usually within a process. Source reduction measures include process modifications, feedstock substitutions, improvements in feedstock purity, improvements in housekeeping and management practices, increases in the efficiency of machinery, and recycling within a process. Source separation. The preparation of individual secondary materials at the point of generation for recycling. Source Separation Recycling Vehicle. A curbside collection vehicle with separate compartments for the specific recycling materials collected and separated at the source (point of collection). Special wastes. Means solid wastes that are difficult to handle, require special precautions because of hazardous properties, or the 69 r ~~ nature of the waste creates waste management problems in r}ormal operations. Specifications. The characteristics of a recyclable material that meet necessary performance requirements. State solid waste management plan ("State Plan" or "Plan"). Means the document prepared in accordance with §4008 (aj(1) of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and which sets forth solid waste management goals and objectives, and describes planning and regulatory concepts to be employed by the Commonwealth. Stop. A stop made by a recycling collection vehicle and crew to pick up materials from a household or business. See set out. supplemental recyclable material. Means construction rubble, tires, concrete and similar inert materials, batteries, ash, sludge or large diameter tree stumps; or as may be authorized by the Director. Tin can. A container made from tin-plated steel. The tin coating typically consists of 0.25 to 4.0 percent of the can's weight. Tipping fee. The charge assessed for unloading solid waste at a disposal or transfer site. Ton. A unit of weight equal to .907 metric tons, or 2,000 pounds. See gross, long, metric, net, and short ton. Tonnage. Means the total number of tons of solid waste registered or carried from individual residences or places of business. Tonne. See metric ton. Top dressing. A covering material, such as yard waste compost, spread on soil without being plowed under. TPD, TPW, TPY. Acronyms for tons per day, tons per week, and tons per year, respectively. Transfer station. Means any solid waste storage or collection facility at which solid waste is transferred from collection vehicles to haulage vehicles for transportation to a central solid waste management facility for disposal; incineration or resource recovery. Trash. Solid waste materials, including plant trimmings but not including food waste. Tub grinder. A machine used to process agricultural and organic wastes, including yard debris. The device incorporates a rotating tub feeding a grinder. 70 '* t,~~ IIsed beverage cans. Used cans generated from the consumption of beer, soft drinks, juice and other beverages. The reference is typically to used aluminum cans. Also known as UBC. IIsed motor oil. Any oil previously used in machinery. IIsed or reused material. Means a material which is either employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or employed in a particular fashion or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resources. Voluntary separation. The participation in waste recycling willingly, as opposed to mandatory recycling. Waste composition. The relative amount of various types of materials in a specific waste stream. Waste diversion credit. A financial incentive provided to municipalities or private recycling operations based on the tonnage diverted from the waste stream. Waste exchange. Means any system to identify sources of wastes with potential for reuse, recycling, or reclamation and to facilitate its acquisition by persons who reuse, recycle, or reclaim it, with a provision for maintaining confidentiality of trade secrets. Waste minimization. An action leading to the reduction of waste generation, particularly by industrial firms. Waste paper. Recyclable paper and paperboard. Waste reduction. The prevention of waste at its source. Waste stream. The waste material output of a community, region, or facility. Waste to energy facility. Means a facility that uses waste to generate usable energy, or treats the waste in order to facilitate its use in the production of usable energy. White goods. A generic term for obsolete major appliances such as refrigerators, water heaters, and stoves. The term derives from the white enameled metal used in many appliances. See also brown goods. windrowiaq. The placement and management of compostable material in piled rows, where micro-organisms break down organic material into a finished compost product. Yard waste. Leaves, grass clippings and other organic wastes produced as part of yard and garden development and maintenance. 71 r ~~ APPENDIB H Roanoke County Board of Supervisor Resolution 72 ,; ., f~-~. AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIINE 25, 1991 RESOLIITION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF SIIPPORT AND REQIIEST FOR APPLICATION TO REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR RECYCLING IMPLEMENTATION GRANT FUNDS. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has initiated action through the Roanoke Valley Landfill Authority to close the existing landfill by 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has initiated the process developed and activated a new landfill and, therefore, recognizes the need for alternative means of disposal; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has reviewed and accepted the Waste Management Hierarchy (Source Reduction, Recycling, Resource Recovery, Incineration, and Landfilling); and WHEREAS, over the past two years the County of Roanoke, Virginia has taken the lead in recycling with curbside collection, source separation, and now automated commingle recycling collection with the goal of a regional approach to Roanoke Valley solid waste management. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Roanoke County accepts and adopts the Commonwealth of Virginia recycle diversion rates of 10~ by 1991, 15~ by 1993, and 25~ by 1995; 73 * ' ,,.~ /y~ Y 2. That Roanoke County, Virginia has developed a ' comprehensive solid waste management program which has included the Waste Management Hierarchy; 3. That the effective date of this resolution is July 1, 1991. 74 ~ ~ ~ ~. wA, ,< APPENDI% I Method of Reporting 75 Calendar Yea x;:;;19 Arboreal means wood, brush, leaves, grass, and similar materials AECYC-1 a ~*r Source Reduction Reuse Please check one box ENTITY ENGAGED IN ACTIVITY: DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES: ESTIMATED WASTE REDUCTION in tons per year: CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: Page otf DW1~I Form I~ECYC-2 ~Qf WAST~~ ~Z ~ n ~ ~ °~P h~~y~ r ~ ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THT ERS ANY KE UNE N25 ~99I1 ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE 62591-9 AMENDING CHAPTER 20, "SOLID WASTE," OF THE ROANORE COUNTYRECCyCLING,'TBY ADDITION OF A NEW ARTICLE III, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN RECYCLING REPORTS WHEREAS, House Bill 543 and Senate Bill 447 of the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly allow counties to require solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials to annually report solid waste information necessary to facilitate compliance with state regulations, and WHEREAS, non-residential entities dispose of more than 40~ of the waste going into the regional landfill; and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate compliance with the state- mandated recycling goals, localities must be able to obtain any and all information pertaining to solid waste generation, management and recycling; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to further the Solid Waste Management Activities of the County of Roanoke and specifically the recycling of solid waste as provided for in Section 15.1-11.5:2 and Section 10.1-1411 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 20, "Solid Waste," of the Roanoke County Code 1 r ~ be amended by the addition of a new Article III entitled "Recycling" as follows: Article III. Recycling Section 20-40. Recycling Reports. 1. Definitions. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces solid waste as defined herein. Manacte means to collect, store, treat, transport, and dispose of solid waste as defined herein. Reused means once having been a waste and being: (1) employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or (2) employed in a particular function or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resource. Recyclinct means the process of separating a given waste material from the waste stream and processing it so that it is used again as a raw material for a product, which may or may not be similar to the original product. Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material, resulting from industrial, commercial, residential, mining, and agricultural operations, or community activities, but does not include: 2 i (1) solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, (2) solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows or in industrial discharges which re sources subject to a permit from the State Water Control Board, or (3) source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Source reduction means any action that reduces or eliminates the generation of waste at the source, usually within a process. Source reduction measures include among others, process modifications, feedstock substitutions, improvements in feedstock purity, improvements in housekeeping and management practices, increases in the efficiency of machinery, and recycling within a process. Princi le rec clable materials means newspaper, ferrous scrap non-ferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated metals, cardboard, kraft paper, container glass, aluminum, high grade office paper, tin cans, cloth, automobile bodies, plastic, clean wood, brush, leaves, grass, and arboreal materials. 2. Report Requirement. All non-residential solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials generated within Roanoke County shall submit an annual report to Roanoke County. The County will provide official reporting forms which can be obtained from the Solid Waste Office or the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Report must be submitted to the Department of General 3 Services - Solid Waste Division by December 31 of the current reporting year. 3. Report Substance. Each annual report required to be submitted hereunder shall include the following information with respect to the reporting party for the period covered by the report: (1) the name and address of the reporting party; (2) the total quantity of solid waste (a) generated, (b) managed, and (c) recycled by the reporting party during the reporting period; and (3 ) the total quantity or volume of solid waste that has been the subject of source reduction or reuse as defined herein. 4. Report Basis. Any report required under this section shall be based on actual volume or weight. Where actual volume or weight cannot be accurately determined, the volume or weight may be reported using carefully estimated data. Any such report shall include a description of the basis for the reported data. 5. Proprietary Protection. Nothing hereunder shall be construed to require any party to report information of a proprietary nature. Where any party fails to report any information otherwise required hereunder based upon a determination that such information is of a proprietary nature, the party shall specify in its report the nature of the information withheld and the basis for its determination that such information 4 is of a proprietary nature. 6, Local Generation. The report shall include only those solid wastes generated within Roanoke County, excluding the Town of Vinton, both in terms of recycled material and material disposed of in the landfill. ~. Civil Penalties. Any party not reporting the required information or otherwise not complying with the provisions of this ordinance shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $100.00. This civil penalty shall be payable to the General Fund of Roanoke County. In addition, any party not in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance may be denied access to or use of the solid waste disposal facility serving Roanoke County. g. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File General Services Gardner Smith, Director, John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 5 Virginia Department of Solid Waste Management Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, JudgJud e George W. Harris, Jr., g Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart County Attorney Paul Mahoney Magistrate Main Library Police Department Roanoke Law Library, Roanoke County Code Sheriff's Office 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Book 6 ~9/-~a., AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T TUESDAY K JUNE N25, AD9 Ii ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, "SOLID WASTE," OF THE ROANOKE COUNT RECYDCL ING THEBY DpROVIDING A NEW ARTICLE III, FOR CERTAIN RECYCLING REPORTS WHEREAS, House Bill 543 and Senate Bill 447 of the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly allow counties to require solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials to annually report solid waste information necessary to facilitate compliance with state regulations, and WHEREAS, non-residential entities dispose of more than 400 of the waste going into the regional landfill; and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate compliance with the state- mandated recycling goals, localities must be able to obtain any and all information pertaining to solid waste generation, management and recycling; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to further the Solid Waste Management Activities of the County of Roanoke and specifically the recycling of solid waste as provided for in Section 15.1-11.5:2 and Section 10.1-1411 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 20, "Solid Waste," of the Roanoke County Code 1 ~~i- s~, be amended by the addition of a new Article III entitled "Recycling" as follows: Article III. Recycling Section 20-40. Recycling Reports. 1. Definitions. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces solid waste as defined herein. Manacte means to collect, store, treat, transport, and dispose of solid waste as defined herein. Reused means once having been a waste and being: (1) employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or (2) employed in a particular function or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resource. Recycling means the process of separating a given waste material from the waste stream and processing it so that it is used again as a raw material for a product, which may or may not be similar to the original product. Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material, resulting from industrial, commercial, residential, mining, and agricultural operations, or community activities, but does not include: 2 ~ ~'~- 5"~ (1) solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, (2) solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows or in industrial discharges which re sources subject to a permit from the State Water Control Board, or (3) source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Source reduction means any action that reduces or eliminates the generation of waste at the source, usually within a process. Source reduction measures include among others, process modifications, feedstock substitutions, improvements in feedstock purity, improvements in housekeeping and management practices, increases in the efficiency of machinery, and recycling within a process. Princi le rec clable materials means newspaper, ferrous scrap non-ferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated metals, cardboard, kraft paper, container glass, aluminum, high grade office paper, tin cans, cloth, automobile bodies, plastic, clean wood, brush, leaves, grass, and arboreal materials. 2. Report Requirement. All non-residential solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials generated within Roanoke County shall submit an annual report to Roanoke County. The County will provide official reporting forms which can be obtained from the Solid Waste Office or the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Report must be submitted to the Department of General 3 Services - Solid Waste Division by December 31 of the current reporting year. 3, Report Substance. Each annual report required to be submitted hereunder shall include the following information with respect to the reporting party for the period covered by the report: (1) the name and address of the reporting party; (2) the total quantity of solid waste (a) generated, (b) managed, and (c) recycled by the reporting party during the reporting period; and (3) the total quantity or volume of solid waste that has been the subject of source reduction or reuse as defined herein. 4, Report Basis. Any report required under this section shall be based on actual volume or weight. Where actual volume or weight cannot be accurately determined, the volume or weight may be reported using carefully estimated data. Any such report shall include a description of the basis for the reported data. 5. Proprietary Protection. Nothing hereunder shall be construed to require any party to report information of a proprietary nature. Where any party fails to report any information otherwise required hereunder based upon a determination that such information is of a proprietary nature, the party shall specify in its report the nature of the information withheld and the basis for its determination that such information 4 ~~~~ is of a proprietary nature. 6. Local Generation. The report shall include only those solid wastes generated within Roanoke County both in terms of recycled material and material disposed of in the landfill. ~, Civil Penalties. Any party not reporting the required information or otherwise not complying with the provisions of this ordinance shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $100.00. This civil penalty shall be payable to the General Fund of Roanoke County. In addition, any party not in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance may be denied access to or use of the solid waste disposal facility serving Roanoke County. 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. 5 ~; AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TROANORECOUNTYPADMINISTRATI NACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TIIESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 625 ~ SENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 17, PROCUREMENT CODE BY THB ADDITION OF A NEN SECT OR A PREFERENCE LFOR THEE PURCHASEPOF RECYCLED PROVIDING F PAPER OR PAPER PRODUCTS WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is the promotion of governmental utilization of recycled paper and paper products; and WHEREAS, Sections 11-47.2 and 15.1-11.5:01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, specifically authorizes this action; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That Chapter 17, Procurement Code of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the addition of a new section numbered 17-21 as follows: Section 17-21. Recycled paper and paper products. a . Recycled paper and paper products means any paper and paper product meeting the EPA Recommended Content Standards as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 250. b. In determining the award of any contract for paper or paper products to be purchased for use by any division, department, or agency of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, the purchasing agent for the County of Roanoke shall use competitive sealed bidding and shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder offering 1 recycled paper or paper products of a quality suitable for the purpose intended, so long as the bid price is not more than ten (10) percent greater than the bid price of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder offering a product that does not qualify as recycled paper and paper products under this ordinance. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~"}'~ ~ Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Sue Hansey, Director, Procurement Gardner Smith, Director, General Services John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Virginia Department of Solid Waste Management Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge 2 Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart County Attorney Paul Mahoney Magistrate Main Library Police Department Roanoke Law Library, Roanoke County Code Sheriff's Office 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Book 3 'S~ f ./ -~ ~C.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THEE D Y K JUNE N25, AD99I1 ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 17, PROCUREMENT CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION A PREFERENCEL FOR THE PURCHASE OFRRECYCLEDRPAPER ING FOR OR PAPER PRODUCTS WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is the promotion of governmental utilization of recycled paper and paper products; and WHEREAS, Sections 11-47.2 and 15.1-11.5:01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, specifically authorizes this action; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 25, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 17, Procurement Code of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the addition of a new section numbered 17-21 as follows: Section 17-21. Recycled paper and paper products. a . Recycled paper and paper products means any paper and paper product meeting the EPA Recommended Content Standards as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 250. b. In determining the award of any contract for paper or paper products to be purchased for use by any division, department, or agency of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, the purchasing agent for the County of Roanoke shall use competitive sealed bidding and shall award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder offering 1 (~ ~~'- recycled paper or paper products of a quality suitable for the purpose intended, so long as the bid price is not more than ten (10) percent greater than the bid price of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder offering a product that does not qualify as recycled paper and paper products under this ordinance. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991. 2 -- , ~ 4~ ~~ %~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T TUESDAAY,K JUNE N25, Ai99I1 IgTRATION CENTER ON RESOLUTION 62591-11 ADOPTING AND IMPLEMENTING A COMPRE- HENSIVE SOLID 1~ASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for Roanoke County was held on June 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has initiated action through the Roanoke Valley Landfill Authority to close the existing landfill by 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has initiated the process to develop and activate a new landfill and, therefore, recognizes the need for alternative means of disposal; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has reviewed and adopted the Waste Management Hierarchy (Source Reduction, Recycling, Resource Recovery, Incineration, and Landfil- ling); and WHEREAS, over the past two years the County of Roanoke, Virginia has taken the lead in recycling with curbside collection, source separation, and now automated commingle recycling collection with the goal of a regional approach to Roanoke Valley solid waste management. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Roanoke County hereby adopts the attached comprehen- sive solid waste management plan; and 1 2. That Roanoke County accepts and adopts the Commonwealth of Virginia recycle diversion rates of 10~ by 1991, 15~ by 1993, and 25~ by 1995; 3. That the effective date of this resolution is July 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: `~ ~. Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gardner Smith, Director, General Services John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Virginia Department of Solid Waste Management 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TROANOKEDCOUNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 RESOLUTION ADO AGEMENTNPLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTYREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MAN WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for Roanoke County was held on June 25, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has initiated action through the Roanoke Valley Landfill Authority to close the existing landfill by 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has initiated the process to develop and activate a new landfill and, therefore, recognizes the need for alternative means of disposal; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has reviewed and adopted the Waste Management Hierarchy (Source Reduction, Recycling, Resource Recovery, Incineration, and Landfilling); and WHEREAS, over the past two years the County of Roanoke, Virginia has taken the lead in recycling with curbside collection, source separation, and now automated commingle recycling collection with the goal of a regional approach to Roanoke Valley solid waste management. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That Roanoke County hereby adopts the attached comprehen- sive solid waste management plan; and 1 r 2. That Roanoke County accepts and adopts the Commonwealth of Virginia recycle diversion rates of 10~ by 1991, 15~ by 1993, and 25% by 1995; 3. That the effective date of this resolution is July 1, 1991. 2 ~ + ~/ `gip? AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE-BOARD OF BUPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 62591-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.39 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5245, 5249, 5241, AND 5237 FALCON RIDGE ROAD (TA% MAP NUMBERS 88.09-1-2; 88.09-1-3; 88.09-1-4; and 88.09-1-5) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND B-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.39 acres, as described herein, and located at 5245, 5249, 5241, and 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, (Tax Map Numbers 88.09-1-2; 88.09-1-3; 88.09-1-4; and 88.09-1-5) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1 and B-1, Single Family Residential District and Office District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 3 of Hunting Hills, Section 7, as shown on plat dated 4/23/73 prepared by Raymond C. Weeks, CLS. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~~?/Z ~ . Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~ti-~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 11-6/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 4, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 25, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R-1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the zoning into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, and 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Massey, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Chappelle F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other r Terrance Ha gton, Se etary Roanoke Co my Pl g Commission (o 9l-/p TO: Roanoke County Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington ~~'` DATE: May 28, 1991 RE: Rezoning of 4 lots from R-1 Single Family Residential District and B-1 Office District to R-1. This is a request initiated by the staff on behalf of the Commission. The request is to rezone four single-family lots from B-1 Office to R-1 Residential. These lots are located on Falcon Ridge Road, and were platted in 1973 as part of Hunting Hills Section 7. The existing B-1 designation on a portion of these four lots appears to be the result of a residual strip of B-1 zoning located along Route 220 South. This zoning was in existence in 1973. The lots apparently were platted without knowledge or consideration of the underlying zoning. The four lots are developed for single-family purposes. Covenants on the properties restrict usage to single family dwellings. The four property owners have been advised of this proposed action. Action to approve this request would be consistent with the existing comprehensive plan designation for Hunting Hills, (Neighborhood Conservation), and would be consistent with existing usage of the properties. '~"~" MEMORANDUM TO: Roanoke County Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington DATE: April 30, 1991 SUBJECT: Rezoning Request for June Planning Commission Public Hearing I am requesting that you initiate the rezoning of four lots located in Hunting Hills from B-1 Office to R-1 Single Family Residential. Your consent agenda has been modified to reflect this request. As shown on the accompanying map, these lots front on Falcon Ridge Road in Hunting Hills, and two lots have frontage on Route 220. Each lot is now developed as single family residential. ft appears that when this section of Hunting Hills was platted in 1973, a strip of B- 1zoning existed along Route 220. This zoning designation was never changed. The B-1 zoning now restricts these four houses from expanding because single family residential uses are not permitted in the B-1 district. The four property owners have been notified of this situation and the reasons for the initiation of this request. They have been invited to fully participate in the process. I expect that they will fully support this rezoning, given that each lot is now used for single family purposes. ff you have concerns regarding the initiation of this rezoning, we can discuss them at your work session on Tuesday. ajb Attachment (.® '_' ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.39 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5245, 5249, 5241, AND 5237 FALCON RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NUMBERS 88.09-1-2; 88.09-1-3; 88.09- 1-4; and 88.09-1-5) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND B-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMI83ION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.39 acres, as described herein, and located at 5245, 5249, 5241, and 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, (Tax Map Numbers 88.09-1-2; 88.09-1-3; 88.09-1-4; and 88.09-1-5) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1 and B-l, Single Family Residential District and Office District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: ,~~ Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 3 of Hunting Hills, Section 7, as shown on plat dated 4/23/73 prepared by Raymond C. Weeks, CLS. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ~ ~~'~'- l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 62591-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.35 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4116 WEST MAIN STREET (TAB MAP NOB. 55.03-3-31 AND 55.03-3-30) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-3 TO THS ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF H & H ASSOCIATES/IMPORT AUTO RECYCLING WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.35 acre, as described herein, and located at 4661 West Main Street, (Tax Map Numbers 55.03-3-30 and 55.03-3- 31) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-3, Special Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of H & H Associates/Import Auto Recycling. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The front of Parcel II (Tax Map No. 55.03-3-30) between Route 11/460 and the stockade fence, will be landscaped as follows: 8 to 10 evergreen shrubs, 18" at the time of planting as shown on the concept plan drawn by Draper Aden Associates and dated June 1991. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel I - Tax Map No. 55.03-3-31 BEGINNING at a point on the south side of Lee Highway (U.S. Route 11), where same intersects the easterly corner of that certain one acre tract of land conveyed by Emma B.C. Fauber to Mattie Blackwell, by deed dated August 7, 1945; thence along and with the easterly line of the one acre tract conveyed to Mattie Blackwell, S. 26 deg. 00' E. 381.29 feet to a point on the northerly line of the Norfolk & Western Railway; thence along and with the northerly line of the Norfolk and Western Railway, N. 72 deg. 32' E. 151.8 feet to a point, corner to the property formerly owned by O.C. and Ocie E. Bowling; thence with the Bowling line, N. 26 deg. 00; W. 403.81 feet to a point on the southerly side of Lee Highway; thence along and with the southerly side of said Lee Highway, S. 64 deg. 00' W. 150.12 feet to the place of BEGINNING. Parcel II - Tax Map No. 55.03-3-30 BEGINNING at a point on the south side of U.S. Route 11, at the west line of a 50-foot strip reserved for a roadway; thence S. 15 deg. 21' E. 421.15 feet to a point on the northline of the Norfolk & Western right-of-way; thence with said right-of-way S. 72 deg. 32' W. 67.93 feet; thence N. 26 deg. W. 403.81 feet to the south line of said Route 11; thence with the south line of said Route 11, N. 64 deg. E. 145 feet to the place of BEGINNING. 5. That a Special Exception is hereby granted to operate an automobile graveyard on the property identified in paragraph 4 above in accordance with Section 21-24-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 6 of the Roanoke County Code. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TE5TE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~ ~ ,~_ ~~ r~ ~ ~ r' ' ~~ ~~. O ti ~~~, ~ ^ ~ N V }~ ^ i~ t ,° ~. ~ C ~ .a ~ a a~ o f ~~ ~. Q. o a ~ ~t~ ~¢~ } ;¢ .~. k; ~ ~$, ~9i-~ PETITIONER: H&H ASSOCIATES/IMPORT AUTO RECYCLING CASE NUMBER: 12-6/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 4, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 25, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling to rezone 2.35 acres from B-3 to M- 2and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located at 4116 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if the site plan were proffered, would we be restricting any future demolition or additions for this site. Staff replied that removal of buildings or making minor additions would not require petitioner to go through the rezoning process again. However, if major new construction is proposed, the concept plan would need to be amended and this would require a change to the proffered condition. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS The front of parcel 2, between Route 11/460 and the stockade fence, will be landscaped as follows: 8 to 10 evergreen shrubs, 18" at time of planting as shown on concept plan drawn by Draper Aden Assoc. and dated June 1991. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to approve the rezoning with proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Massey, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Chappelle F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton, S retary Roanoke Co ty Planning Commission ~,~.~ ~~ CASE NUMBER: 12-6/91 REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid 1. NATURE OF REQUEST STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: H&H Associates DATE: June 4, 1991 a. Unconditional request of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling to rezone two lots totalling 2.35 acres from B- 3 to M-2, and obtain a Special Exception permit. The petitioner currently operates an automotive parts recycling and storage business on adjoining properties. If approved, this petition would allow the expansion of this use. These two sites would be used primarily for the outside storage of vehicles. b. The sites are located on West Main Street in the Catawba Magisterial District. The western most site contains three buildings. The small cinder block building at the front of the property contains a heating and cooling retail business. Petitioner has indicated that this business will likely remain and that the larger cinder block building may be leased out to a compatible business. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-2 General Industrial District allows a wide variety of manufacturing, assembling and storage uses. b. There are no side or rear yard regulations in the M-2 District, except for lots adjacent to a residential district boundary. c. The screening and buffering requirements of the Roanoke County zoning ordinance do not apply to industrial sites that border on other industrial sites as is the case with this petition. The district regulations do provide the flexibility to require landscaping in the front setback area and around off-street parking areas. d. The Roanoke County Code regulates automobile graveyards as to record keeping, fencing, and environmental issues. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Generally flat with some gentle slope southward towards the railroad. b. Ground Cover: Weeds, grass, gravel 1 ~~ ~- ~...f 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar Community Planning Area. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that growth be stimulated in this area. These parcels are largely vacant and the proposed use is compatible with the growth priority. b. General area: These sites are bordered on the east, west and south by industrial sites and the railroad tracks. Across Route 11/460 is the water filtration plant, a convenience store, and two single-family residences. The Route 11/460 frontage is all zoned business. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial Land Use category. The proposed use is compatible with this designation. 3 b. Surrounding Land: This site is bordered on the north by Route 11/460, on the east by Route 817, and on the south by railroad tracks. The petitioners existing business borders this site on the west. On the north side of Route 11/460 a two hundred foot strip of road frontage is zoned Business. All of the other surrounding properties are zoned M-2. 2 c. Neighboring Area: This area is industrial and commercial in nature. Although there are two single family residences in close proximity these parcels are zoned business. 2 d. Site Layout: One site has two cinder block buildings and a metal/frame building. The second site is vacant. Petitioner proposes to store cars on both lots behind a stockade fence. Petitioner has not proffered the concept plan. N/A e. Architecture: 2 ~~~ 3 f. Screening and Buffering: The zoning ordinance does not require any screening and buffering for these sites. The ordinance does allow the legislative flexibility to require landscaping within an established front setback area. The petitioner has proposed, on the concept plan, to plant shrubs on the street side of the stockade fence along Route 11/460. At this time the petitioner has not proffered the concept plan. The Roanoke County Code requires that these sites be entirely enclosed by a hedge or fence eight feet in height. The fence must be of a solid material, i.e. plank boards, brick, cinder block, etc. 1 g. Amenities: No additional parking is required for the expanded automotive parts recycling business. There is adequate parking for the existing heating and cooling business. N/A h. Natural Features: None. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: The section of Route 11/460 from the west Salem City line to Interstate 81 had a 1983 vehicle count of 6,500 vehicles per day. The proposed use will have an insignificant impact on increased traffic. 2 j. Circulation: Adequate circulation. UTILITIES 1 k. Water: Existing water and sewer service is adequate. DRAINAGE 1 n. Floodplain: These sites are not within the 100-year floodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES 1 0. Fire and Rescue Service: Adequate service can be provided to this site. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. -Land and Improvement Value: $160,000 -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: -Total Employees: Probably no additional employees. -Total revenue to the County/Year: 3 (~ % !- `~ ENVIRONMENT N/A t. Air: No impacts. 2 u. Water: The existing business is a state-of-the art recycling facility. Vehicles are drained of all water, anti-freeze, oil and gasoline before they are removed from the tow trucks. Oil and gasoline is recycled. There should be no water or soil impacts as a result of these operating practices. 2 v. Soils: See comment above. 2 w. Noise: Some noise from the crushing operation. 2 x. Signage: Petitioner will be required to comply with sign regulations of the Roanoke County zoning ordinance and Roanoke County Code. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. The proposed use is consistent with this Comprehensive Plan designation. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1)The expansion of this existing business is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. b. Weaknesses: (1)Petitioner has not proffered the concept plan. c. Proffers Suggested: (1)Petitioner should proffer the concept plan. 4 ~;7 AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS § 6.4 Sec. 6.1. Defined. As used in this chapter, the term "automobile graveyard" means any lot or place which is exposed to the weather and upon which more than Cive (5) inoperative motor vehicles, trailers, or semitrailers las defined in Chapter 12, section 12.122 of the Roanoke County Code) are placed, located, or found. Code 1971, § 6-1; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84; Ord. No. 32586-78, § 2(a1, 3-25-86) Cross references-Inoperable motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers, § 12-121 et seq.; zoning, App. A. State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 33.1.348(b)(2). Sec. 6.2. Violations of chapter. Unless otherwise specifically provided, a violation of any provision of this chapter shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor. Cross reference-Penalty for Class 1 misdemeanor, § 1-10. Sec. 6.3. Record of purchases. Every person operating an automobile graveyard who purchases any vehicle or vehicle parts or accessories shall record, in a book kept at his place of business, the following infor- mation concerning each such purchase: (1) The day and time of day of the purchase. (2J The name, address, race, age and height of the seller and of the person actually delivering the vehicle or parts or accessories. (3) The amount of the purchase price. (4) The make, state license number, motor number, body number, style and seating capacity of the vehicle purchased. (5) The make and identifying number of radiators, speedometers and magnetos pur- chased. (6) Such other information as may be necessary to prove ownership or identity of the vehicle or parts or accessories purchased. (Cade 1971, § 6-14) Sec. 6.4. Inquiry as to right of seller to make sale. Before the operator of an automobile graveyard purchases any vehicle or vehicle parts or accessories, diligent inquiry shall also be made as to the legal right of the seller to make such sale. (Code 1971, § 6-14) 311 ~~' § 6.5 ROANOI{E COUNTY CODE Sec. 6.5. Inspections. All automobile graveyards, together with the records required by section 6-3, shall, at all times during normal business hours, be kept open for inspection to all officers of the county having police powers, including the sheritr, zoning administrator, fire marshal and business license inspector. Code 1971, § 6-15; Ord. No. 84-202, 11.13-54) Sec. 6.6. Fencing. ia~ Automobile_grave~ards shall be entirely enclosed by a hedge or fence eight (8) feet in height. The fence shall be kept neatly painted and in good repair at all times as required by the zoning administrator and shall be constructed of plank boards, corrugated_iron, brick, cinder block or concrete, so as to exclude such graveyards from public view. No plank board fence shall be erected within any fire zone as now or hereafter established, and any fence so erected shall be at least twenty (20) feet from the street or road and in no event beyond the building line of other buildings on the same street or road. ib~ A fence required by this section shall not be used for bill posting or other advertising purpose, except for the advertisement of the business of the owner thereof. Where the auto- mobile graveyard Fronts on more than one street or road, the use of space for advertisement herein permitted shall extend to each street or road on which the graveyard abuts. ' ~c~ The contents of an automobile graveyazd shall not be placed or deposited to a hei ht __ g greater than the height of the hedge or fence required by this section. Code 1971, § 6-7; Ord. No. 84.202, 11.13-84) Sec. 6.7. To be kept free of rubbish and waste matter. An automobile graveyazd shall, as faz as practicable, be kept clear and clean of all rubbish or waste matter, as well as solid waste as defined in chapter 20 of this Code. +Code 1971, § 6-9; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Cross references-Unlawful accumulations of trash, § 13-14; solid waste generally, Ch. 20. Sec. 6.8. Abutting sidewalks to be kept clean. All sidewalks abutting an automobile graveyard shall be kept clear and clean of all vehicles, trash or other waste matter. !Code 1971, § 6-13) Sec. 6.9. Abutting streets to be kept clear of inoperable vehicles. All streets abutting an automobile graveyard shall be kept clear and clean of all vehicles incapable of being operated under their own power. (Code 1971, § 6.13) 312 ~ ~ ~. y AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS § 6-13 Sec. 6.10. Fire extinguishers and other safety devices. Safety devices, such as Cire extinguishers or other like apparatus, shall be required at an automobile graveyard as set forth in the building code and fiire prevention code. Code 1971, § 6-10; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Cross references-Building code, § 7.16 et seq.; fire prevention code, Ch. 9. Sec. 6.11. Fires. ~ai No open fires for the burning of rubbish, trash, automobiles or parts thereof or other waste matter shall be permitted at an automobile graveyard; provided, that an accidental or casual fire occasioned by the use of an acetylene torch shall not be regarded as an open fire, where it is shown that the person operating or maintaining the automobile graveyard has, by the use of Cire extinguishers or other safety devices, made reasonable effort to prevent the same. obi No fire, open or enclosed, for the burning of automobiles, parts thereof or any rubbish or trash shall be permitted at an automobile graveyard, if the smoke or fly ash therefrom will damage the property of any person. (Code 1971, § 6-8) Cross reference-Air pollution control, Ch. 3. Sec. 6-12. Gasoline to be drained from vehicles. All tanks and engines of vehicles at automobile graveyards shall be kept thoroughly t ;.~~` ~ drained of gasoline. (Code 1971, § 6.111 Sec. 6.13. Tanks, containers, etc., to be kept drained of water. All tanks, engines, automobile parts, receptacles and containers capable of holding water ~, or any source of stagnant water whatever, where mosquitoes may breed at an automobile graveyard, shall be kept thoroughly drained and dry. (Code 1971, § 6-12) (The next page ie 363] 313 c 0 .~ c a x m a m o~ ~~ .~ ~~ m~ ~~ a r w ~' ~ 0 m w m v ~ v a a v m ~~ m~ r l/f ; 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~~ ~ f ] ,A~ AAA ~~ ~~. `` j 6SM~IY ~; H + 1 ' F t 1 } O v 1 , ` W s ~ O ~. J ~ ~ Q - ~~ r Q ~ ~O t f ' O ` .: ({. .S ~ - - ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ . s ~ 3 ~. ;, F ' ,' 4 y T .. i, s i•' ` ~; . ~ ; ,. ~ Via,, ~ ~ ~ + ~~' ;. r- ,~ #. ~~ ~ ~. '' ,~'~ ~ t ,j . f,; .+ ; ,, ~, ~ ~ !{~ ~ t ~ •C ~ :~j i r : ! ~ ti _~ ' t SE\T BY~K~OODS.ROGERS,&HaZLEGRO~ 6-1~-91 ~ 1203 i ~ VIRGINIA: Roanoke- 7037722030:: 3' 3 ~~ . ~ ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: Rezoning of 2.35 acres of land } located at 4116 West ) Main Street bearing Official ) Tax No. 55.03-03-30 and No. ) PRpFFERED CONDITIONS 55.03-03-31 from 8-3 Special } Commercial District to M-2 ) General Industrial District ) TO THE HONORABLE BOARD pF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H&H Associates, Import Auto Recycl~.ng, Inc. and $ank of Shawsville, respectfully request the 2.35 acres situated at 4],16 West Main Street to be x'ezoned M-2 General Industrial District. be subject to the following condition: 1. The front of Parcel No. 2 between State Rdute 11-460 and the stockade fence will be landscaped by 8 to 10 evergreen shrubs, at least 18 inches at the time of planting, as shown on the June 19, 1991, concept plan by Draper-Aden Associates, Inc. filed as an exhibit with the Petition to Rezone. BANK OF $HAWSVILLE By: By: H&H ASSOCIATES IMPORT AUTp RECYCLING, INC. 8y: w OFFICES IDS, RODERE ~-ZLEOROYE ~NOKE, YA. .._ ~ .. JU"!r 19, 1991 ,.<<r~ w~..`'_~~ -. .EEC ~ U S• C '~ ~ 1295 IRON PIK $ET•y,. , ~ , a N FOUND E CLEAR '.~; 0.19 CLEAR 1.58 H H ASSOC. T X PARCEL NO 55.03-03-32 :'' ~ ::: ' RUS~ r ~~ ' ' ~ 150.12 • • .. ~: • ~ IPE .SiGta'-•-••:::..: ~ JUN ~ H£TZU .... 1' ' . • ' ~ CN1N£N$I•~. •• •. : ~; L: t- ' • -:-~-:.~~- :•~•-~••~:-:~f'Af?GEL•:2--:•~.••:-~.~-' . 8L1 -~ ' • ~•• •-• ~~ TAX Nn. 55.133.=n3-3n~: . 3.34, PG: •-264 ~ :• :-:•-. { ~~~ ~:D.B: . . ~ . . ' 18, ~ . - . .. OSED ~...•::: :. '~~.•..- ~~p F~µClr ~ -' .. :. ....::::.. 7 . ~ -~.. PPOPOSED 8~ HIGH •• '.: gT0 ......:... ::....::: 33. : pPAQUE FENCING ~ - . (EXISTING 6~CLF) • . METAL •.. '4 .::.......... ~ ~ ~ _~~' ~....... FR BLDG. •-::~.....•..• ...~ -.. :X•• N N -PRO 0$~D:'•GAR•~. ~ - : STO. E ~Af~EA.•_: . . w o • Z Z~ - . PARCEL' ~- ~f• -•. ~: ~-. ~~• ~~ ~~ ~-~ •~-. •: •• ~• ••-~~ .. -. • • . :~.•:~:~.:: AC.~• -•• Zo ~. ~1.35 .o ..~-.•:•:-•::::. ~ :o ....• ......... •• • :: - • ~ : • . . .. -•0~L.31. ~-- '.•••-~-:TAX No..55:fJ~ .. :•- • .: . ~.-.:::: en 4 •:.:.:...o ^~z...:.•••.........:•.,•.:. • ~: . :~-.•~~~ a~8: f3~4,:~:PG. X64:•:-: • . ••:-.•~•••:•::::.•~.•.:-.~::::: ;:•:;::•...:... . ::'. EX. WOVEN WIRE FENCE . • ~ ~,•::: ~ ~• • -.: -•'• ' ~~ ~ • •' - '•~••' TQ BE REPLACED WITH .~ ::" ~ ' : .~..... .. ~ .. • .. • • . • . . • ~.'.':';~.~,f 8 OPAQUE- FENC.E•151.80'• 93' fi7 '. ,~. • . .. ..' • ' IRON PIN FOUND PROPERTY OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP. 80~ R~W ~-- S 72° 32' 00" W (219.73) PIN FOUND IRON PIN SET 3 ~ ~ ~~ W 0 0 ~~ ti DD W W Q 1 0 W a a Y I\\ AXLE FOUND REZONING MAP FOR H &H ASSOCIATES t ' ` KYI I mx R jy ~ ~/ {~ / •- J•+J S, M+ I~H~ ~'~\ OoP~.Q' \ N° qty ~, Kam,, ~ ,~ YICINITI' MAP .. ' •. ^ d ~P ~~ NORTB .-- -- COMblUNI1YSERYICBS F: ~H ASSOCIATES/I"1PCR? AUTO ANDDBVBLOPMBNT ~ P.ECYCLIIG g-3 TO M-2 ~-~ ~~i-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.35 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4116 WEST MAIN STREET (TAX MAP NOS. 55.03-3-31 AND 55.03-3-30) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF H & H ASSOCIATES/IMPORT AUTO RECYCLING WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 25, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 4, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.35 acre, as described herein, and located at 4661 West Main Street, (Tax Map Numbers 55.03-3-30 and 55.03-3-31) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-3, Special Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of H & H Associates/Import Auto Recycling. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The front of Parcel II (Tax Map No. 55.03-3-30) between Route 11/460 and the stockade fence, will be landscaped as follows: 8 to 10 evergreen ~~~ ~ shrubs, 18" at the time of planting as shown on the concept plan drawn by Draper Aden Associates and dated June 1991. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel I - Tax Map No 55.03-3-31 BEGINNING at a point on the south side of Lee Highway (U.S. Route 11), where same intersects the easterly corner of that certain one acre tract of land conveyed by Emma B.C. Fauber to Mattie Blackwell, by deed dated August 7, 1945; thence along and with the easterly line of the one acre tract conveyed to Mattie Blackwell, S. 26 deg. 00' E. 381.29 feet to a point on the northerly line of the Norfolk & Western Railway; thence along and with the northerly line of the Norfolk and Western Railway, N. 72 deg. 32' E. 151.8 feet to a point, corner to the property formerly owned by O.C. and Ocie E. Bowling; thence with the Bowling line, N. 26 deg. 00; W. 403.81 feet to a point on the southerly side of Lee Highway; thence along and with the southerly side of said Lee Highway, S. 64 deg. 00' W. 150.12 feet to the place of BEGINNING. Parcel II - Tax Map No 55.03-3-30 BEGINNING at a point on the south side of U.S. Route 11, at the west line of a 50-foot strip reserved for a roadway; thence S. 15 deg. 21' E. 421.15 feet to a point on the northline of the Norfolk & Western right-of-way; thence with said right-of-way S. 72 deg. 32' W. 67.93 feet; thence N. 26 deg. W. 403.81 feet to the south line of said Route 11; thence with the south line of said Route 11, N. 64 deg. E. 145 feet to the place of BEGINNING. 5. That a Special Exception is hereby granted to operate an automobile graveyard on the property identified in paragraph 4 above in accordance with Section 21-24-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 6 of the Roanoke County Code. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. a ~'' f ,~~'" I AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 62591-14 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BOTETOURT COUNTY FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, certain parcels of real estate located in Botetourt County, Virginia, were deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in order to permit the widening and improvement of Reservoir Road (Route 648) as part of the "Hollins Community Development Project" , financed in part by Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, for the portions of this road lying in Botetourt County, Virginia, it is necessary that the rights-of-way for said road be deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, as a condition for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accepting the improved Reservoir Road into the Virginia Secondary road system. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, a first reading concerning the conveyance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on June 11, 1991; a second reading was held on June 25, 1991. The real estate involved consists of twenty (20) parcels of land located in Botetourt County, Virginia, and previously conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by various landowners for the purpose of improving Reservoir Road. 2. That Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 29, as shown on a set of plans entitled "Hollins Community Development Project" on file in the office of the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities are hereby authorized and approved to be conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, for the purpose of acceptance of the improved Reservoir Road into the State Secondary System of the Virginia Department of Transportation. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: /~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Virginia Department of Transportation John Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator George Simpson, Director, Engineering ACTION NO. ITEM NO. S ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of Rights-of-Way in Hollins Community Development Project to Botetourt County for Acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the road improvements undertaken in conjunction with the Hollins Community Development Project for Reservoir Road (Route 648), twenty (20) parcels of land, most of which were physically located in Botetourt County, were conveyed by adjacent property owners to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The subject parcels were portions of larger pieces of land, fifteen (15) of which are carried on the Roanoke County tax records. In order to obtain final approval and acceptance of the improved Reservoir Road into the State Secondary System, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires a resolution to guarantee title to and request final approval of Reservoir Road. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 51491-10.e with respect to the portion of Reservoir Road that lies within the County of Roanoke. A similar resolution is needed from the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County for the remaining major portion of Reservoir Road lying in Botetourt County. Conveyance of the twenty parcels by deed to Botetourt County will enable the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County to adopt the appropriate resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the conveyance of these parcels to Botetourt County so the required resolution may be adopted to finalize approval and acceptance of the improved Reservoir Road into the State Secondary System by VDOT. Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. Huf a Assistant County Attorney s-e No zes Hps Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF RIGHTS-OF- WAY IN HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BOTETOURT COUNTY FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, certain parcels of real estate located in Botetourt County, Virginia, were deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in order to permit the widening and improvement of Reservoir Road (Route 648) as part of the "Hollins Community Development Project", financed in part by Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, for the portions of this road lying in Botetourt County, Virginia, it is necessary that the rights-of-way for said road be deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, as a condition for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accepting the improved Reservoir Road into the Virginia Secondary road system. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, a first reading concerning the conveyance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on June 11, 1991; a second reading was held on June 25, 1991. The real estate involved consists of twenty (20) parcels of land located in Botetourt County, Virginia, and previously conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by various landowners for the purpose of improving Reservoir Road. 2. That Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, S -~ 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 29, as shown on a set of plans entitled "Hollins Community Development Project" on file in the office of the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities are hereby authorized and approved to be conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, for the purpose of acceptance of the improved Reservoir Road into the State Secondary System of the Virginia Department of Transportation. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. „~. .~,. ~~,. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 62591-15 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTION OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.2 and in Article 2 (Section 18.2-226 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the County. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all amendments to said laws made effective as of the date that this ordinance is itself effective. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: `~-~ ~~' ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart County Attorney Paul Mahoney Magistrate Main Library Police Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Sheriff's Office Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment and readoption of Section 12-8 of the Roanoke County Code; adopting provisions of Title 46.2 and 18.2 of the Code of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1991 session of the General Assembly of Virginia adopted certain amendments to the Motor Vehicle laws of Virginia (Title 46.2). Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Roanoke County Code, contains within Article I, a Section 12-8 entitled Adoption of state law. The purpose of Section 12-8 is to incorporate by reference those sections of Virginia law found in Title 46.2, Motor Vehicles, and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2, Crimes, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which are applicable to the regulation of traffic within Roanoke County. Amendments as a result of the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly to Title 46.2 and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, become effective as of July 1, 1991. The purpose of this ordinance is to make clear that the Board of Supervisors has taken affirmative action after the General Assembly amendments to bring these changes in the law into proper effect for Roanoke County. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Failure to adopt this amendment risks having any traffic charge issued as a County violation which involves incorporation by reference of any Virginia code section amended by the General Assembly being dismissed as not properly subject to the County Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this proposed amendment and reenactment. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 1 S -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTION OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.2 and in Article 2 (Section 18.2-226 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the County. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed c~'~~ for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all amendments to said laws made effective as of the date that this ordinance is itself effective. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1991. .~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE 62591-16 AUTHORIZING DEDICATION OF VINYARD PARR DRIVE IN FEE SIMPLE TO THE CITY OF ROANORE AND ALL APPURTENANT EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC USE AND AUTHORIZING EgECUTION OF A NEW AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROANORE CONCERNING VINYARD PARR DRIVE WHEREAS, Vinyard Park is a recreational facility located in the City of Roanoke, owned and developed by Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Park requires adequate road access; and, WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke has cooperated with the County and recommended allocation of necessary recreational access funds pursuant to §33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for construction of the road; and WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Roanoke and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) concerning the road provides that the City of Roanoke will acquire the right of way and easements necessary for the construction of the project at no cost to VDOT; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke City and Roanoke County have negotiated a new agreement concerning this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and a second reading was held on June 25, 1991. 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the Plat Showing "NEW 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY & NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE DEDICATED TO CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA", dated 27 February, 1990, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to dedicate the right-of-way for Vinyard Park Drive to the City of Roanoke in fee simple and to dedicate the necessary drainage easements to public use. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the new proposed agreement with the City of Roanoke concerning Vinyard Park Drive, and particularly providing for dedication of the right-of-way and easements. 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such other actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: /`F Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation George Simpson, Director, Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. ITEM NO . v _ _ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 25, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING DEDICATION OF VINYARD PARK DRIVE IN FEE SIMPLE TO THE CITY OF ROANOKE AND ALL APPURTENANT EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC USE AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A NEW AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE CONCERNING VINYARD PARK DRIVE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This is the first reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize dedication of Vinyard Park Drive in fee simple to the City of Roanoke, and further to authorize dedication of all easements in connection therewith to public use. This proposed ordinance would also authorize execution of a new agreement with the City of Roanoke concerning Vinyard Park Drive. BACKGROUND' Vinyard Park is located within the City of Roanoke, but is owned, developed and maintained by the County. When the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation initiated plans to construct an access road to the Park, it was determined that the application to the Commonwealth of Virginia for a park access road grant must be filed by the City. Staff worked with officials from the City of Roanoke, who filed an application on behalf of Roanoke County for the park access road grant in the amount of $26,000.00, utilizing the 1987- 88 fiscal year allocations. The resolution adopted by City Council made this application contingent upon an acceptable agreement being reached between the County and City, wherein the County would maintain full responsibility for this roadway. On July 12, 1988, the Board adopted Resolution No. 71288-2, authorizing the County Administrator to enter into the agreement. 1 s- ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The access road, known as Vinyard Park Drive, is in the process of being completed in accordance with state standards by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The final stages of road construction, i.e. paving, remain to be completed by contract through VDOT. One of the requirements for VDOT to obtain the park access funds for completion is that the road must be dedicated to the City of Roanoke. Dedication can be accomplished by execution and recordation of the plat, dated February 27, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The plat requires approval of the Subdivision Agent and City Engineer of the City of Roanoke. In order to obtain such approval, the City has proposed that a new agreement be entered into between the City and the County. Most of the revisions or additions involve recitation of obligations which have previously been agreed to or complied with from a practical standpoint. One provision in particular has been added which, according to the City, necessitates execution of a new agreement. The County would agree to ensure that the Access Road is accepted into and becomes part of the road system, including dedication of the land, while the City would agree to cooperate with the County's efforts with respect to said acceptance and dedication. FISCAL IMPACTS' Credit of $26,000.00 to the County of Roanoke for completion of Vinyard Park Drive; any cost over this estimated amount is to be reimbursed to VDOT by the City, which in turn is to be paid by the County. In the event that the cost is under $26,000.00, the difference remains with VDOT for reallocation. ALTERNATIVES' (1) Authorize the County Administrator to execute the plat showing "NEW 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY & NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE DEDICATED TO CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA" and to enter into the proposed new agreement with the City of Roanoke with regard to Vinyard Park Drive and maintenance thereof. (2) Take no further action with respect to Vinyard Park Drive, in which case the $26,000.00 will be reallocated by VDOT and Vinyard Park Drive will not be completed. Also, those funds already expended by VDOT for the road construction must ultimately be paid by the County of Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute the dedication plat and execute the new agreement with the City of Roanoke concerning Vinyard Park Drive. 2 s-3 Respectfully submitted, Vick'e L. m n Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 3 -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING DEDICATION OF VINYARD PARK DRIVE IN FEE SIMPLE TO THE CITY OF ROANOKE AND ALL APPURTENANT EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC USE AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A NEW AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE CONCERNING VINYARD PARK DRIVE WHEREAS, Vinyard Park is a recreational facility located in the City of Roanoke, owned and developed by Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Park requires adequate road access; and, WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke has cooperated with the County and recommended allocation of necessary recreational access funds pursuant to §33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for construction of the road; and WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Roanoke and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) concerning the road provides that the City of Roanoke will acquire the right of way and easements necessary for the construction of the project at no cost to VDOT; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke City and Roanoke County have negotiated a new agreement concerning this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 11, 1991; and a second reading was held on June 25, 1991. s-.3 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the Plat Showing "NEW 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY & NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE DEDICATED TO CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA", dated 27 February, 1990, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to dedicate the right-of-way for Vinyard Park Drive to the City of Roanoke in fee simple and to dedicate the necessary drainage easements to public use. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute the new proposed agreement with the City of Roanoke concerning Vinyard Park Drive, and particularly providing for dedication of the right-of-way and easements. 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such other actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. O~ ROANp,Y~ ~ '~ A Z Z °v a 18~ E50 8$ `rFgQU1CENTENN~P~' A beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~uixn~~ of ~uttnnkr June 26, 1991 Mr. John R. Hubbard Assistant County Administrator Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hubbard: ALL~AMERICA CITY '~II~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWEtA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, June 25, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board for a four-year term. Your term will expire on July 31, 1995. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, `~'~ GL~ y Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: John H. Parrott, Chairman Jeffrey Cromer, Disposal Manager P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 OF ROANp~~ > A i ti p Z ~ ~ 2 o, ,a 18 E50 8$ `rFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~n~tnt~ of ~nttnnke June 26, 1991 Mr. George Simpson Assistant Director Engineering & Inspections Department P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Simpson: ALL~AMERIG CITY '~II~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWElA MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MALsLST'ERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, June 25, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as an advisory member of the Transportation and Safety Commission. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~n~~ ~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. William G. Rosebro, Chairman P.O. BOX 29800 ROAN®KE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 OF p,OANp~~ ~ ,~ Z ~~ ~ a 1$ E50 $8 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeQinninq COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE June 26, 1991 Ms. Ann E. Weaver Executive Director Clean Valley Council, Inc. P. O. Box 3320 Roanoke, VA 24015-1320 Dear Ms. Weaver: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN GTAWE3A MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINT'ON MAGISTERUL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERW. DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 62591-4.b authorizing the Clean Valley Council to apply for an anti-litter program grant for Roanoke County. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 25, 1991. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Randolph Smith, Salem City Manager W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Brad Corcoran, Vinton Town Manager John B. Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator AL4AMERICA WTY 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANIOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 - ~~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON JUNE 11, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF $105,432 GRANT AND APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Public School Division submitted a proposal to the Virginia Department of Education and received funding in the amount of $105,432 for Project YES- Target Grants for Dropout Prevention - for 1991-92, and WHEREAS, the overall objective of Project YES is to lower the dropout rate in Roanoke County Public Schools with efforts aimed at increasing average daily attendance, providing preventive counseling and support for identified at-risk students and providing a comprehensive vocational education assessment on each of these students, and establishing transitional programs and expanding tutorial and crisis intervention programs; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests acceptance of the $105,432 grant and an appropriation of said amount to the appropriate revenue and expenditure accounts in the School Operating Fund. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Paul G. Black, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ~. i i / ~~% .~-3 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P,M, ON JUNE 11, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION CENTER, SALEM, VIRGINIA, RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND FOR REMEDIAL SUMMER SCHOOL, WHEREAS, remediation in math and reading has been offered in Roanoke County's summer school program for grades K, four, five, and six in past years primarily because state funding was sufficient for only those grades, and WHEREAS, subsequent to adoption of the 1991-92 School Operating Budget, notification was received from the Virginia Department of Education that funding would be available for grades K - six, and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the number of Roanoke County students in grades one, two, and three who would qualify for the summer remediation program would increase the total enrollment by 100 percent, thus increasing the amount budgeted by 100 percent; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B, Chewning and duly seconded, requests an additional appropriation of $27,733 to the summer school remedial education revenue and expenditure accounts in the School Operating Budget increasing the total budgeted amount to $55,466. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S, Pafford, Paul G, Black, Frank E, Thomas NAYS: None VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: Rezoning of 2.35 acres of land ) located at 4116 West ) Main Street bearing Official ) Tax No. 55.03-03-30 and No. ) PROFFERED CONDITIONS 55.03-03-31 from B-3 Special ) Commercial District to M-2 ) General Industrial District ) TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H&H Associates, Import Auto Recycling, Inc. and Bank of Shawsville, respectfully request the 2.35 acres situated at 4116 West Main Street to be rezoned M-2 General Industrial District be subject to the following condition: 1. The front of Parcel No. 2 between State Route 11-460 and the stockade fence will be landscaped by 8 to 10 evergreen shrubs, at least 18 inches at the time of planting, as shown on the June 19, 1991, concept plan by Draper-Aden Associates, Inc, filed as an exhibit with the Petition to Rezone. BA~OF SH VILLE r _~ By : ~ '~. R. Luke^~;ivel r. Vice President l ~. H&H ~S.SO IA`rES By: IMPOR AU RECYCLING, ' OFFICES By ~S, ROGERS !IEGROVE VOKE, VA. George: 1 ~~~ As you know, Mr. Hodge pulled your board report. He would like the following information included in the board report for 6/25: 1. Why are we reinstituting? Is the control worth the loss of good will? 2. Is this a decision of all libiraries? Has Roanoke City and Salem reinstituted fees? 3. What happens if Roanoke County says NO.? How does this affect automated system if two out of three assesss fines while one does not? 4. While you don't know how much money this will raise, can you check a few other localities to get some estimate of the funds that would be generated. Sorry this was pulled so late. Mary Allen JUNE 25 R ecognitions Bev Waldo ~ Ken Hogan Glenvar Girls Softball team v Northside High School Prom-Promise Contesnt new business Appropriation to the 1991-92 Regional Special Education Fund Request for Funds - Alleghany Health District Request for Funds - Cer~en on and Visitors(; BUr,~au Litter Grant - Clean Valley Council ~ ~ > 1ST READING & public hearing Library Fine •~,-~ ~- -~ ~~~ 2nd Reading & public hearing Water Rates . Utility tax fees Vacation of easement - Ron Smith jRecycled Paper ~~~_ ~~ ' Recycling Code amendments ~ __.__._._~________-_ _-.- -_J Solid Waste Plan .- Rezoning R-1 Falcon Ridge Road ~ Special Exception - Auto graveyard 2nd Reading of Ord. -- ~tights-of Way - Hollins Project ' Code amendment - Traffic i ~„/' L _ -__~-- ~7 ~• ~. ,~ Vinyard Park Drive Work Session Water System Solid Waste Plan Executive Session Allied Signal JULY 9 Privatization Report Work Session - CIP Adoption of CIP Work Session - Water System RESOURCE AUTHORITY Bids for transfer of refuse F A ~F >. F. ~p 2 ~ d2 ~ ~` '" ~ ~ iE OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 241 53 June 12, 1991 TO: Mary Allen FROM: Ruth Wade Enclosed is an item for the June 25 Board of Supervisors' agenda. Thanks. Enclosure ~~~ ~~~~ LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, JUNE 25, 1991, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. on the petition of RONALD B. SMITH, requesting VACATION OF A 12 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 4, BLOCK 5, SECTION 1, HIDDEN VALLEY HOMES SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this FOURTH DAY OF JUNE, 1991. ~~~ ~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 1991 TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Arnold Covey, Director Engineering and Inspections County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ~. r - _.,,Y PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 25, 1991, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 2-5 TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE OF FINES AND FEES FOR OVERDUE, DAMAGED, OR LOST PUBLIC LIBRARY MATERIALS AND TO PROVIDE FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 11, 1991 June 18, 1991 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Post-It`"" ttal memo 7671 brand fax transmi # pages - To / ,+A,e 1 J '~,C~£ ,~.. l Fromm. ~ ~ `.. 1.. _. S Co. CO. Dept. Phone #6~ ~~~ _ t ll~~' o~-V Fax # Fax # ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 25, 1991, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, RATES AND FEES OF CHAPTER 22, WATER BY PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN PROCEDURES, FOR AN INCREASE IN WATER SERVICE RATES, FOR AN INCREASE IN CONNECTION FEES, AND FOR CERTAIN EFFECTIVE DATES All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~ ~ • yv~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 11, 1991 June 18, 1991 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 25, 1991, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-3, UTILITY SERVICE TAX OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION BY PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR SUCH SERVICES, FOR AN EXPANSION OF THE SERVICES SUBJECT TO THIS TAX, AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. _Vv\.~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 11, 1991 June 18, 1991 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors ,P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling to rezone 2.35 acres from B-3 to M-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located at 4116 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated : June 6 , 19 91 ~,~~ ~ ~~Z~~' ~..i Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 11, 1991 Tuesday, June 18, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling c/o Woods, Rogers & Hazelgrove PO Box 720 Roanoke, VA 24004-0720 (703) 982-4200 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO$ 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R-1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the zoning into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, and 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 6, 1991 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 11, 1991 Tuesday, June 18, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Commission PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 BEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE~ VA 24018 ;~ -~~ ~~ ~~~, ~ 2. Approval of Agreement with Certified Medical Representative Institute, Inc. for fee in lieu of Real Estate taxes. A-61191-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE - URC 3. Request from Roanoke County Firefighters Association for payroll deduction of dues. A-61191-5 BLJ MOTION TO GRANT -DENIED AYES-RWR, BI,J NAYS-LBE,BLJ,HCN E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on June 25, 1991 to discuss water lines for new water system. BLS MOTION TO SET WORK SESSION FOR 6/25 AND CONTINUE TO 7/9 - URC F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing an increase in the Utility Service Tax and adding Water Service as a taxable utility service. BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING WITH MINOR CHANGES TO ORDINANCE - URC 2ND - 6/25/91 3 a. Ordinance amending Chapter 20, "Solid Waste," of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new article III, "Recycling" by providing for certain recycling reports. VOTE TAKEN ABOVE b. Ordinance amending Chapter 17 of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of a new Section providing for a preference for the purchase of recycled paper or paper products. VOTE TAKEN ABOVE 5. Ordinance authorizing corrveyance of Rights-of-Way in Hollins Community Development Project to Botetourt County for acceptance by VDOT. BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT 1ST READING URC - 2ND 6/25/91 6. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 12-8, Adoption of State Law of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic. RWR MOTION TO ADOPT 1ST READING URC - 2ND 6/25/91 7. Ordinance authorizing the dedication of Vinyard Park Drive to the City of Roanoke and the execution of a new agreement with the City concerning Vinyard Park Drive. HCN MOTION TO ADOPT 1ST RE~iDING URC - 2ND 6/25/91 5 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending and reenacting Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 12, Water by providing procedures for an increase in water service rates and connection fees. LBE MOTION TO DEFER UNTIL BOARD HAS STUDIED COMPLETE RATE FEASIBILITY STUDY CONDUCTED BY CONSULTANTS - NO VOTE HCN SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AYES-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM NAYS-LBE 2ND - 6/25/91 LBE ASKED THAT HIS WRITTEN COMII~NTS BE INCLUDED IN 11~IINiJTES 3. Ordinance vacating an existing 12 foot public utility and drainage easement located on Lot 4, Block 5, Section 1, Hidden Valley Homes Subdivision, upon petition of Ronald B. Smith. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC 2ND - 6/25/91 4. Ordinances amending the Roanoke County Code regarding Recycling and the purchase of recycled paper. HCN ASKED THAT APPROVAL BE CONTINUED TO 7/9/91 BECAUSE HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND 6/25 MEETING RWR TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET WORK SESSION FOR 6/25/91 AYES-LBE,RWR,BLJ,SAM ABSTAIN-HCN 4 H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council 2. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 3. Transportation and Safety Commission ~~~p,/`o„ 4, Roanoke Valley Regional Cable TV Committee 5. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board HCN NOMINATED JOHN HUBBARD TO FOUR-YEAR TERM J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO ON IN THE FORM WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTI OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-61191-6 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE WITH ITEM 5 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE - URC 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Board 6 NONE G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance to rezone approximately 3.39 acres from R-1 and B-1 to R-1 to bring the zoning into conformity with the residential use, located at 5245, 5249, 5241, and 5237 Falcon Ridge Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. 2. An ordinance to rezone 2.35 acres from B-3 to M-2 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located at 4116 West Main Street Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of H&H Associates/Import Auto Recycling HCN MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 6/25/91 URC H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE 4 BOARD MEETING CHECK UST MEETING DATE: Minister: Reminder: Public Hearings Advertised: ' Draft Agenda Prepared: Reminder to Outside Participants: Prepare any "fancy" resolutions: BOARD MEETING DAY: Board Reading File Done: "Fancy" Resolutions Signed and ready: Tapes Prepared: Sound System Ready: Room Set up: Media Packet ready: Double Spaced Agenda: , Chairman told of anything different: Extra Agenda Copies: Dinner Plans: # People for Dinner: AGENDA FOLLOWUP Action Agenda Prepared and sent: Thank you letter -Minister: Resolutions and Ordinances Completed: Board Report Action completed: Appointment Letters: Bingo/Raffle Letters: Other letters prepared: Meeting Board filed in: Followup memos to staff: Other: COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1991 JANUARY FEBRUARY REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Three year term of Richard W. Robers will expire 02/10/91. MARCH LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COUNCIL One year term of Frances R. Holsinger will expire 03/31/91. LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS One year term of Murry K. White will expire 03/31/91. APRIL TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year terms of Lt. Art LaPrade for the County Police; Fred C. Altizer, Jr., for the Virginia Department of Transportation; H. Rodney Smith for the Senior Citizens, and Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison, will expire 04/01/91. MAY JUNE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of Eldon L. Karr, Windsor Hills District, will expire 06/30/91. CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL Two year terms of Vince Reynolds and Richard W. Robers, Advisory Member, will expire 06/30/91. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Three year term of Charles Steve Garrett will expire 06/30/91. 1 PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District; Yvonne Willis, Catawba District; James Bryant, Hollins District; Paul D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District; and Roger L. Falls, Vinton District; will expire 06/30/91. ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Four year terms °Vinton District,awill aexpire 06/30/91. and Barbara Chewning, VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD Four year terms of Stephen A. Musselwhite and Jean Glontz will expire 06/30/91. JULY ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD Four year term of John Hubbard, will expire 07/31/91. AUGUST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD One year terms of Bernard Hairston and Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate, will expire 08/31/91. SEPTEMBER GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 09/27/91. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Four year terms of Charles R. Saul and Bill Triplett will expire 09/26/91. OCTOBER GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Cecil Hill, 10/12/91. Alternate, will expire 2 NOVEMBER HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Two year term of Anne Renner will expire 11/26/91. DECEMBER ROANORE COUNTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY . Four year terms of Steven A. McGraw and Richard W. Robers will expire 12/31/91. COURT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD Three year terms of Harry C. Nickens and Betty Pullen will expire 12/31/91. LIBRARY BOARD Four year terms of Jane Bryant, Catawba District, and Dr. Paul M. Zeis, Windsor Hills District, will expire 12/31/91. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD Three year terms of Rita J. Gliniecki, and Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large, will expire 12/31/91. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year terms of Ronald L. Massey, Hollins District and Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring District, will expire 12/31/91. 3 1990 IINFILLED COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS HOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of M. E. Maxey, Chairman, Vinton District, expired 06/30/90. BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell expired 12/12/90. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, expired 12/31/90. APPOINTMENTS/VACANCIES TO BE FILLED FOR 1991 DISTRICT TERM EICPIRES ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AUTHORITY Steven A. McGraw Catawba 4 yrs 12/31/91 Richard W. Robers Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Eldon L. Karr Windsor Hills 5 yrs 06/30/91 M. E. Maxey, Chairman Vinton 5 yrs 06/30/90 BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Wilmore T. Leffell 4 yrs 12/12/90 CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL Vince Reynolds 2 yrs 06/30/91 Richard W. Robers, Advisory 2 yrs 06/30/91 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOIIRCES BOARD Bernard Hairston 1 yr 08/13/91 Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate 1 yr 08/13/91 COURT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD (INACTIVE UNTIL FURTHER_NOTICE) James K. Sanders Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/91 Gerald Curtiss Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90 Roger Smith Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90 Gary J. Minter Hollins 2 yrs 03/22/90 Sherry Robison Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/90 Hoyt C. Rath Vinton 2 yrs 01 26 89 James L. Trout Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89 Ted R. Powell Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89 Dr. J. Andrew Archer Vinton 2 yrs 03/22/88 Youth Members Cave Spring 1 yr William Byrd 1 yr 1 PARRS & RECREATION_ADVISORY COMMISSION Kenneth D. Bowen Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91 Yvonne Willis Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91 James Bryant Hollins 3 yrs 06/30/91 Paul D. Bailey Windsor Hills 3 yrs 06/30/91 Roger L. Falls Vinton 3 yrs 06/30/91 ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Ronald L. Massey Hollins 4 yrs 12/31/91 Donald R. Witt Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91 A. Kyle Robinson Vinton 4 yrs 12/31/90 REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Richard W. Robers 3 yrs 02/10/91 ROANORE COIINTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Frank E. Thomas Catawba 4 yrs 06/30/91 Barbara Chewning Vinton 4 yrs 06/30/91 ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD John Hubbard TRANSPORTATION ANDSAFETY COMMISSION 4 yrs 07/31/91 Lt. Art LaPrade, County Police 4 yrs 04/01/91 Fred C. Altizer, Jr., VDOT, Cave Spring 4 yrs 04/01/91 H. Rodney Smith, Sen.Citizen, Windsor Hills 4 yrs 04/01/91 Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison Vinton 4 yrs 04/01/91 VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMIINITY COLLEGE BOARD Stephen A. Musselwhite Jean Glontz 4 yrs 06/30/91 4 yrs 06/30/91 3 Glenvar High 1 yr Northside High 1 yr COIIRT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD Harry C. Nickens Betty Pullen FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Charles Steve Garrett GRIEVANCE PANEL Kim Owens Cecil Hill, Alternate HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Anne Renner INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY Charles R. Saul Bill Triplett LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COIINCIL Frances R. Holsinger 3 yrs 3 yrs 3 yrs 2 yrs 3 yrs 2 yrs 4 yrs 4 yrs 1 yr LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS Murry K. White LIBRARY BOARD Jane Bryant Dr. Paul M. Zeis Catawba 4 yrs Windsor Hills 4 yrs MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD Rita J. Gliniecki 3 yrs Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large 3 yrs 12/31/91 12/31/91 06/30/91 09/27/91 10/12/91 11/26/91 09/26/91 09/26/91 03/31/91 03/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 2 O~ 1a0ANp~~ z ~ ~ ~ z o `a 150 ~/{ /x~ 1 $ YEAflS ~/y SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nunt~ of ~uttnnkr January 8, 1991 Rev. G. Thomas Brown Southview United Methodist Church 3539 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Reverend Brown: ALI~AMERICA CITY '' I I' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS.6I~FMRM>•cl'f' CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. 1A6E-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILIS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS y1CB VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT(~µAA ~-! ~,;- ~~~ ~-~ ~~ On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board Meetings in the past. We would again like to call on you to present the invocation on Tuesday, June 25, 1991, at 3:00 p.m. For your information, I am attaching a list of the board meeting dates for 1991. These meetings are held the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month and the invocation is always given at 3 p.m. If the date requested above is not convenient, please call me at 772-2005. I will be calling you soon to see if this time is acceptable to you or if you would prefer another date. The Board members are aware of how busy your schedule is, and they appreciate your volunteering your time to offer God's blessing at their meetings. Sincerely, 9~ Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~"' ~~ /r` ~ -C~~.~ _~_----- P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~ A ~~ >. F- 70 2 d2 rj ' OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 June 14, 1991 TO: Mary All~n FROM: Ruth Wad ~ Enclosed are two more items for the June 25 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Dr. Gordon and Mr. Kidd will be present to answer any questions board members may have. Enclosures (2)