Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/24/1991 - RegularOF AOANp~.~ w ~ ~ I/ '"Q ALL-AMERICA CITY 8 E50 88 s~SQUICENTENN\P~' ~ A Beauti fuJBeginning ' ~ ~ . Q ROANOKE COUN1~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call at 3:05 p.m. BLOT ARRIVED 3:07 P.M. HCN ARRIVED 3:35 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i ITEM O -LBE ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE DISPOSITION OF PUBLICLY-HELD REAL ESTATE THE OLD BENT MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION ECH INTRODUCED AMY LONG SENIOR AT HOLLINS COLLEGE WHO WILL BE SERVING AN INTERNSHIP WITH THE COUNTY WORKING WITH THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Lowell Gobble. R-92491-1 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT LOWELL GOBBLE ACCEPTED 2. Recognition of Arnold Covey for being named Public Employee of the Year by the Roanoke Valley Regional Home Builders Association. ARNOLD COVEY PRESENT D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Support for Roanoke County's United Way Campaign. 2 R-92491-2 B T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT PLEDGE CARDS DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MEMBERS 2. Report from Mr. Briggs Andrews, Council of Community Services' Board Member, and Chairman, Needs Assessment Project. MR. BRIGGS ANDREWS PRESENTED REPORT 3. Policy requiring environmental assessment for real estate acquisitions. A-92491-3 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH HCN ABSENT LBE RE VESTED A STAFF REPORT ON OPTIONS AND DIFFERENT METHODS FOR PREPARATION OF A POLICY MANUAL E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 NONE G. PUBLIC FEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA B T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 10/22/91 1. An ordinance authorizing a Use Not Provided for Permit to allow a caretaker's mobile home in the campground, located at 5753 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dixie Caverns & Pottery, Inc. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on a 0.685 acre tract zoned M-1 and obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a taxi service located at 4909 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 2.15 acres from B- 3 to B-2 to construct a motel, located at the intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Relax, Inc. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An ordinance authorizing the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park to the Roanoke Symphony Association. 4 0-92491-4 RWR MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH WORD "AVAILABLE" INSERTED IN AGREEMENT 6.D - URC 2 An ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a 13.88 acre parcel of land to construct a Water Pump Station for the Spring Hollow Water Project. 0-92491-5 B ~T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: RWR, B ~T, HCN, SAM NAYS: LBE ONE CITIZEN SPOKE I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel. LBE ADVISED THAT HE WILL MAKE A NOMINATION AT THE NEXT MEETING 2. Industrial Development Authority. HCN ADVISED THAT A NOMINATION FROM VINTON SHOULD BE RECEIVED BEFORE THE 10/8/91 MEETING J. CONSENT AGENDA. ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA 5 ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO ON N THE FORM WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTI OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-92491-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Community Corrections Resources Board and Grievance Panel. A-92491-6.a 2. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer, from Section 22. A-92491-6.b 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2. A-92491-6.c 4. Donation of a water, sewer and drainage easement from David L & Diane L. Caldwell to the County of Roanoke. A-92491-6.d 5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program. 6 A-92491-6.e 6. Acknowledgement of acceptance of 0.05 miles of Lange Lane in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. A-92491-6.f 7. Donation of a drainage easement in connection with Suncrest Heights Subdivision, Section 3. A-92491-6.g g, Approval of Raffle Permit for Oak Grove Elementary School PTA. A-92491-6.h 9. Settlement of contract dispute with GTE/Vision Tech regarding CAD software package. A-92491-6.i K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY (1) INOi1IRED ABOUT STATUS OF LEAF COLLECTION CIP AND DIRECTORY OF COUNTY SERVICES. ECH RESPONDED. 2 RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PRIVATIZATION WORK SESSION AND DISAPPOINTED AT RESULTS. (3) FELT THE STAFF REPORT ON LOW-FLOW TOILETS WAS NOT COMPLETE AND LACKED DETAIL. (4~ INQUIRED ABOUT THE STATUS OF SEWER STANDARDS. PMM ADVISED COUNTY IS WORKING WITH THE CITY'S TIMETABLE ON THIS. (5) INQUIRED ABOUT STATUS OF RESPONSE CARD IN ROANOKE COUNTY TODAY. AMG ADVISED THAT REPORT HAD BEEN COMPILED AND COPIES SENT TO THE SUPERVISORS. ASKED PMM WHEN LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM WOULD BE COMPLETE. PMM ADVISED THIS SHOULD BE READY BY 10/8/91 MEETING. SUPERVISOR NICKENS (11 COMMENTED ON THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY TODAY SURVEY REPORT AND FELT RTC SHOULD BE COMPLIMENTED BE UFUFSERED THE CITY HAS BEGUN CITYSCENE NEWSLETTER. (2 SUGGESTION THAT PLASTIC BOTTLES COULD BE FILLED WITH WATER AND PUT INTO TOILETS TO CONSERVE WATER. THIS WOULD ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY AND EXPENSE OF LOW- FLOW TOILETS. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON (1) WELCOMED NEWEST INDUSTRY, MAGNETIC BEARINGS AT VALLEYPOINTE TODAY AND REQUESTED RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATIOS ~F OR ~~ /WATER MEETING. 2 HAS RECEIVED COMPLAINT PRESSURE AT TREVILLIAN AND QUAIL PLACE. REOUESTED COUNTY STAFF BRING BACK PLAN TO HELP CITIZENS ON PUBLIC WATER WHO HAVE LOW WA'T'ER PRESSURE. (3) TIRED OF DENIGRATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND STAFF. SUPERVISOR ROBERS ~1) ADVISED THAT GENERAL MOTORS AND VOLVO MET AT TECH YESTERDAY TO DISCUSS TECHNICAL PROPOSALS FOR SMART HIGHWAY.MrJVDOROi~1'I'E FOR MEETING SOON AT TECH TO DETERMINE THE THE ROAD. 2 COMMENTED 'T'HAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO LOOK AT AREAS WHERE WE COULD PRIVATIZE. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW (1) MET WITH BLUE RIDGE STUDY COMIVIISSION AT BLACKSBURG TODAY. (2) MET WITH VACO/VML ANNEXATION TASK FORCE IN CHARLOTTESVILLE. (3 COMII~NTED THAT GOVERNMENTS MAY NEED TO PUBLICIZE s THEMSELVES SUCH AS IS BEING DONE WITH SLETTER 40~~ TODAY AND CITYSCENE. ROANOKE CITY NEW COMIVHTTEE OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY ECONOMIC LL~a~LV~..~...~.s ,_~--- COMBINING CITY AND COUNTY ECONOMIC D~E~LO~PMENT EFFORTS. 5 ADVISED THAT CITY AND CO - ~~_, . ~..r,r~. r~TTT r !'~ ATi7Ti'i? 1 ALCOHOL FREE FUN. L. CITIZENS' COMI~~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS RAY SCHER SUGGESTED A MEDIATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY _ _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~.-. ..,..-r, .../1!1 T A T T uT TiT iITT CONFLICT WITHOUT FURTHER COURT ACTION M. REPORTS MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW LBE REQUESTED THAT (1) LIST OF SCHOOL PROlECTS_ RECEIVED FROM DR WILSON AND (2) MEMO CONCERNING CITIZENS IN GOVERNMENT FROM ANNE MARIE GREEN BE RECEIVED AND FILED AS PART OF THE REPORTS SAM DIRECTED THAT THESE TWO REPORTS BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR 10/8/91 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August 1991 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of August 31, 1991. 6. Report on policy regarding RADAR transportation into the County. N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A. (3) to discuss the disposition of publicly- held real estate, the old Bent Mountain Fire Station. FOLLOWING THE RESOURCE AUTHORITY MEETING URC EXECUTIVE SESSION HELD AT 5:55 P.M. RECESS AT 6.00 P.M. EVENING SESSION 7:00 P.M. ALL PRESENT O. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 0.443 acre, more or less, known as the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. ADDED BY PAUL MAHONEY FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION 10 LBE MOVED 1ST READING - URC 2ND READING - 10/8/91 O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-92491-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC P. PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolutions of Congratulations to Vinton Sluggers, Ponytail Division, Softball Team for winning the State Championship. R-92491-8 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC COACHES AND PLAYERS WERE PRESENT Q. PUBLIC HEARINGS 991-1 Special Exception Request of Shelva Walker to operate a beauty shop located at 6961 LaMarre Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. 0-92491-9 ii BI T MOTION TO APPROVE - URC R PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 991-2 An ordinance to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow aself-storage facility, located at 6426 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of 301 Gilmer Associates. (REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 27, 1991) 0-92491-10 RWR MOTION TO ADOPT ORD -DENIED AYES• LBE. RWR NAYS: BL.T, HCN, SAM 991-3 An ordinance to obtain a Use Not Provided for Permit to erect aself-supporting communication tower, located off of Twelve O'clock Knob Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Cellular One. 0-92491-11 SAM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: LBE- HCN, SAM NAYS: RWR, BLT 991-4 An ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement located on lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 12 0-92491-12 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD - URC 991-5 An ordinance vacating a 20 foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. 0-92491-13 B T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD - URC B RE VESTED THAT STAFF CONTACT MR. LINGERFELT CONCERNING RECENT COMPLAINTS ABOUT WATER FROM VAI,LEYPOINTE RUNNING ACROSS PETERS CREEK ROAD S. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE T. ADJOURNMENT HCN MOTION TO AD TOURN AT 7.45 P.M. - UW 13 0~ ROANp~~ ~~ a2 ~ ~~ ~~~1T~~.~ 1 C~~~n ~a E50~ as sFSRU1CENTENN~P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q .A Bcaati~ul8egimm~g o ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Lowell Gobble. 2. Recognition of Arnold Covey for receiving the Public Employee of the Year Award by the Roanoke Valley Regional Home Builders Association. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Support for Roanoke County's United Way Campaign. 2. Report from Mr. Briggs Andrews, Council of Community Services' Board Member, and Chairman, Needs Assessment Project. 3. Policy requiring environmental assessment for real estate acquisitions. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF a ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance authorizing a Use Not Provided for Permit to allow a caretaker's mobile home in the campground, located at 5753 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dixie Caverns & Pottery, Inc. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on a 0.685 acre tract zoned M-1 and obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a taxi service located at 4909 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 2.15 acres from B- 3 to B-2 to construct a motel, located at the intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Relax, Inc. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An ordinance authorizing the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park to the Roanoke Symphony Association. 2 An ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a 13.88 acre parcel of land to construct a Water Pump Station for the Spring Hollow Water Project. I. APPOINTMENTS 3 1. Grievance Panel. 2. Industrial Development Authority. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Community Corrections Resources Board and Grievance Panel. 2. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer, from Section 22. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2. 4. Donation of a water, sewer and drainage easement from David L & Diane L. Caldwell to the County of Roanoke. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program. 6. Acknowledgement of acceptance of 0.05 miles of Lange Lane in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Donation of a drainage easement in connection with 4 Suncrest Heights Subdivision, Section 3. 8. Approval of Raffle Permit for Oak Grove Elementary School PTA. 9. Settlement of contract dispute with GTE/Vision Tech regarding CAD software package. K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' COMI~~NTS AND COMMiJNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August 1991 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of August 31, 1991. 6. Report on policy regarding RADAR transportation into the County. 5 N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A O. CERTIFICATION. OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION P. PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolutions of Congratulations to Vinton Sluggers, Ponytail Division, Softball Team for winning the State Championship. Q. PUBLIC HEARINGS 991-1 Special Exception Request of Shelva Walker to operate a beauty shop located at 6961 LaMarre Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. R PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 6 991-2 An ordinance to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow aself-storage facility, located at 6426 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of 301 Gilmer Associates. (REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 27, 1991) 991-3 An ordinance to obtain a Use Not Provided for Permit to erect aself-supporting communication tower, located off of Twelve O'clock Knob Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Cellular One. 991-4 An ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement located on lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 991-5 An ordinance vacating a 20 foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. S. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T. ADJOURNMENT r ,~ _ 1 L- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION 92491-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO LOWELL GOBBLE FOR THIRTY-ONE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY CITIZENS WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served as the Roanoke County Extension Agent since 1960 and will retire this year after 31 years in that office; and WHEREAS, in the 75 years of the Extension Service, Lowell Gobble has served as Extension Agent for Roanoke County longer than any other agent; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served during a period of change in the agricultural character of Roanoke County, and yet he and his staff have found ways to meet the needs of all the citizens, homeowners and farmers alike, during this period; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has made an invaluable contribution to the children of the Roanoke Valley, with his dedication to 4-H Clubs throughout the region; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served the Extension Service and the State of Virginia with dedication and has been a good friend and co-worker to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Staff . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of the many residents of the Roanoke Valley who have benefitted from Mr. Gobble's advice and friendship, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation and gratitude to LOWELL GOBBLE for thirty-one years .~. of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County citizens. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO LOWELL GOBBLE FOR THIRTY-ONE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY CITIZENS WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served as the Roanoke County Extension Agent since 1960 and will retire this year after 31 years in that office; and WHEREAS, in the 75 years of the Extension Service, Lowell Gobble has served as Extension Agent for Roanoke County longer than any other agent; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served during a period of change in the agricultural character of Roanoke County, and yet he and his staff have found ways to meet the needs of all the citizens, homeowners and farmers alike, during this period; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has made an invaluable contribution to the children of the Roanoke Valley, with his dedication to 4-H Clubs throughout the region; and WHEREAS, Lowell Gobble has served the Extension Service and the State of Virginia with dedication and has been a good friend and co-worker to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Staff . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of the many residents of the Roanoke Valley who have benefitted from Mr. Gobble's advice and friendship, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation and gratitude to LOWELL GOBBLE for thirty-one years G- ~ f ~ , of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County citizens. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of "Public Employee of the Year" Award received by Arnold Covey COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : C~~~~,,"""' i~`'~'r-` ~~ "`'~ BACKGROUND' Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections, received the first annual "Public Employee of the Year" Award from the Roanoke Valley Regional Home Builders Association. This award was presented at their meeting on September 12, 1991. The criteria for this award is: (1) employee must be directly involved in the control, development, supervision, or production of new housing (2) in the opinion of the Awards Committee, a person who has, within the limits of his or her responsibility, done the most to assist in providing new housing through the private section to the general public, (3) individual should be in the planning, public works, zoning, code enforcement, engineering or inspections department of the jurisdiction involved, although other employees are not excluded from consideration if appropriate Respectfully submitted, ~S ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION 92491-2 AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL AND SUPPORT OF THE ROANORE COUNTY EMPLOYEES 1991 UNITED WAY FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has established a solid tradition of supporting local community services through contribution to United Way; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the United Way program extends support to many valley agencies to include emergency service companies in the County; and WHEREAS, it is the goal of the County in 1991 to increase the level of contributor participation over the previous year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do support the ROANORE COUNTY 1991 UNITED WAY FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN and encourage that the opportunity of participation be given to employees. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors encourages all Team Captains to give their best efforts to ensure that their individual departments participate and support the County and Roanoke Valley programs in their endeavors to attain the goals set forth. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gardner Smith, Director, General Services ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF 3UPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for support for the United Way Campaign COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The United Way campaign for the Roanoke Valley is getting under way for 1991 with a goal to increase participation over last year. Thirty six health and human service agencies throughout the Roanoke Valley will be supported by these contributions. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Campaign Staff is in place to begin the campaign and the goal is to increase participation by 5.2%. Gardner W. Smith will serve as Campaign Coordinator and will be working with a committee of Team Captains and the United Way Loaned Executive, Steve Smith, to reach the goal established for the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Board is asked to approve the attached resolution in support of the 1991 Roanoke County United Way Program. The Board of Supervisors is further asked to support the United Way of Roanoke Valley by contributing a portion of their gift through the County Team Captains and authorizing the County employees to participate in the campaign by encouraging all employees to be generous with their pledges. Re pectf ly submitted, Approved by, ardner W. Smith Elmer C. Hodge Director of General Services County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs cc: Gardner W. Smith, Director of General Services John Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator File -~ - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL AND SUPPORT OF THE ROANORE COUNTY EMPLOYEES 1991 UNITED WAY FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has established a solid tradition of supporting local community services through contribution to United Way; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the United Way program extends support to many valley agencies to include emergency service companies in the County; and WHEREAS, it is the goal of the County in 1991 to increase the level of contributor participation over the previous year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do support the ROANORE COUNTY 1991 UNITED WAY FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN and encourage that the opportunity of participation be given to employees. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors encourages all Team Captains to give their best efforts to ensure that their individual departments participate and support the County and Roanoke Valley programs in their endeavors to attain the goals set forth. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~° 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Report from Mr. Briggs Andrews, Council of Community Services' Board Member, and Chairman, Needs Assessment Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' Mr. Briggs Andrews, Council of Community Services' Board Member, and Chairman, Needs Assessment Project, has asked to appear before the Board today. He would like to explain the Council's Needs Assessment Project. An information sheet from Mr. Andrews is attached. Respectfully submitted, Appro ed b , ~~~~ `~'Y(cc.u~- Mary H Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers _ r ~ Council of Community Services 518 Carlton Terrace Building / P.O. Box 598 920 South Jefferson Street / Roanoke, VA 24004 Telephone: (703) 985-0131 ~~ PRESIDENT: Broaddus C. Fitzpatrick VICE PRESIDENTS: NEEDS aSSESS~[EtiT PROJECT C. Stan Cross, Jr. -~ Jn Tuesday . July 23, 1991 the Coureil of ::ommunitti Howard Packett Cheri Hartman, Ph.D. Sergi°ices announc?d the implementation of a ~-a11e~--wide human service needs assessment. The assessment is BOARD OF DIRECTORS: designed to identif~~ the seriousness of need in the specific areas of child and ~ouih services, adult ser- BriggsAndrews vices, ~lderi;- services and other o~°erali communit~- Roger L. Baumgardner needs . Caroyn R. Bass James P. Beatty ~ committee has been appointed by the Board of the Michael W. Coffman Council of Community Services to guide the needs assess- David C. Douglas went project. Board member Bri;;s Andrews has been MarcS.Fink J. W. "Bill" Fox, Jr. named committee chair. Cther members are :+iar~- Ellen Jan B. Garrett Carneal, Bill Elliot, Heidi hrisch, Katherine McCain, Kenneth Haley and Harry Nickens. William F. Hawkins Edna Henning The needs assessment process will ;et underway this Calvin Johnson summer with distribution of a survey form to selected Samuel L Lionberger tar;et groups and key informants. The process will Richard D. Lucas culminate this fall in the release of the study results Donna Proctor and the conduction of a human services assembly during MariynA. Rigby which the needs identified in the study will be Wayne Stusher VanettaStockton addressed. Mary Ellen Carneal EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Raleigh Campbell The Council of Community Services is a non-profit, community-based, citizen-led planning agency primarily serving the residents of the Fifth Planning District and Southwestern Virginia. A United Way Agency P COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY SUMMER 1991 '~-- PLEASE NOTE: IT IS POSSIBLE YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED THIS SURVEY THROUGH ANOTHER SOURCE DUE TO YOUR INVOLVEMENT WITH MORE THAN ONE ORGANIZATION OR CIVIC GROUP. SHOULD YOU RECEIVE DUPLICATE SURVEYS PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN ONLY ONE. THANK YOU. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z THE FOLLOWING ISALISTOFCOMMON PROBLEMSAND NEEDS ACOMMUNITII'MIGHTHAVE. WE ARE INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHETHER YOU FEEL THE ROANOKE VALLEY HAS THESE PROBLEMS AND NEEDS AND IF SO, HOW SERIOUS EACH ONE IS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO TELL US WHAT YOU THINK. YOUR OPINION IS IMPORTANT. WHEN COMPILED ALONG WITH THE OPINION OF MANY OTHERS IN THE VALLEY, WE WILL GET AN IDEA OF THE PROBLEM AND NEED AREAS TO WORK ON. INSTRUCTIONS: FOR EACH PROBLEM OR NEED LISTED PLEASE TELL US HOW SERIOUS YOU THINK IT IS IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY. IF YOU FEELTHE PROBLEM OR NEED IS: VERY SERIOUS S CIRCLE 1 IN THAT LINE SERIOUS SE CIRCLE 2 IN THAT LINE NOT SERIOUS NS CIRCLE 3 IN THAT LINE IF YOU DON'T KNOW D CIRCLE 4 IN THAT LINE PLEASE NOTE THAT WE HAVE ARRANGED THE LIST OF PROBLEMS AND NEEDS IN FOUR DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. THE SAME PROBLEM OR NEED MAY APPEAR IN MORE THAN ONE CATEGORY. CATEGORY PROBLEM/NEED VS HOW SERIOUS SE NS DK CHILDREN 1. Youth suicide 1 2 3 4 & 2. Child abuse and neglect 1 2 3 4 YOUTH 3. Lack of child care providers/facilities 1 2 3 4 4. Lack of emergency shelters for children/youth 1 2 3 4 5. Teenage pregnancy 1 2 3 4 6. Lack of supervised/structured recreation programs 1 2 3 4 7. Alcohol abuse 1 2 3 4 8. Drug abuse 1 2 3 4 9. Lack of youth employment opportunities 1 2 3 4 10. Lack of services for the physically handicapped 1 2 3 4 i CATEGORY PROBLEM/NEED VS HOW SERIOUS SE NS DK CHILDREN 11. Lack of services for the mentally retarded 1 2 3 4 YOUTH 12. Lack of services for the emotionally disturbed 1 2 3 4 continued 13. Juvenile crime 1 2 3 4 14. Lack of preventive/comprehensive health care 1 2 3 4 15. Lack of after-school and/or summer programs 1 2 3 4 16. Lack of family-focused treatment for children 1 2 3 4 17. Need for comprehensive school-based health services 1 2 3 4 18. Poor physical fitness and nutrition 1 2 3 4 19. Transportation to/from child care services 1 2 3 4 20. Need for affordable child care services for working 1 2 3 4 parents ADULTS 1. Alcohol abuse 1 2 3 4 2. Drug abuse 1 2 3 4 3. Need for family planning services 1 2 3 4 4. Need for rape counseling/education services 1 2 3 4 5. Need for emergency shelters for abused women 1 2 3 4 6. Need for career counseling or retraining 1 2 3 4 7. Unemployment 1 2 3 4 8. Lack of recreation programs/services 1 2 3 4 9. Family violence 1 2 3 4 10. Need for family counseling services 1 2 3 4 11. Need for services for the mentally retarded 1 2 3 4 12. Need for services for the physically handicapped 1 2 3 4 13. Need for services for the mentally ill 1 2 3 4 14. Illiteracy 1 2 3 4 15. Poor physical fitness and nutrition 1 2 3 4 16. Need for parenting education programs 1 2 3 4 17. Need for financial counseling services 1 2 3 4 -2- HOW SERIOUS CATEGORY PROBLEM/NEED VS SE NS DK ELDERLY 1. Lack of day care services 1 2 3 4 2. Need for more in-home meals delivery 1 2 3 4 3. Lack of affordable in-home medical care services 1 2 3 4 4. Need for more in-home personal care services 1 2 3 4 5. Need for subsidized home maintenance 1 2 3 4 6. Lack of legal aid services 1 2 3 4 7. Need for congregate living facilities 1 2 3 4 8. Need for respite services for care givers 1 2 3 4 9. Lack of transportation services for frail elderly 1 2 3 4 10. Lack of resources for medications for Medicaid ineligible 1 2 3 4 11. Need for mental health services for home-bound elderly 1 2 3 4 12. Abuse of the elderly 1 2 3 4 13. Need for additional services to protect the elderly from 1 2 3 4 neglect/abuse 14. Need for temporary emergency shelters for abused 1 2 3 4 elderly 15. Need for personal care to help the elderly maintain their 1 2 3 4 independence (e.g., shopping, etc.) 16. Lack of recreational/leisure time activities 1 2 3 4 COMMUNITY 1. Lack of affordable housing 1 2 3 4 CONCERNS 2 Inadequate public transportation 1 2 3 4 3. Lack of special needs transportation (e.g., poor, handi- 1 2 3 4 capped) 4. Need for centralized information and referral for human 1 2 3 4 services 5. Lack of emergency financial assistance 1 2 3 4 6. Lack of emergency assistance -food 1 2 3 4 ~ 7. Lack of emergency assistance -clothing 1 2 3 4 '~ 8. Lack of emergency health care 1 2 3 4 9. Need for centralized volunteer recruitment/development 1 2 3 4 ~~ 10. Need for increased crime prevention 1 2 3 4 I' 11. Need for community-wide planning 1 2 3 4 j 12. Lack of emergency community mental health 1 2 3 4 -3- f ~ CATEGORY PROBLEM/NEED VS HOW SERIOUS SE NS DK COMMUNITY 13. Lack of AIDS education and/or prevention programs 1 2 3 4 CONCERNS 14. Pollution (water, air, waste) 1 2 3 4 15. Poverty 1 2 3 4 16. Lack of affordable legal services 1 2 3 4 17. Lack of affordable medical care 1 2 3 4 18. Racial/ethnic discrimination 1 2 3 4 19. Substandard housing 1 2 3 4 20. Shortage of recreational facilities/programs 1 2 3 4 21. Homelessness 1 2 3 4 22. Lack of community awareness of available resources 1 2 3 4 23. Need for recycling facilities 1 2 3 4 24. Need for coordination of human services 1 2 3 4 25. Crime 1 2 3 4 26. Lack of affordable dental care 1 2 3 4 YOUR TIME AND EFFORT TO COMPLETE THIS SURVEY IS GREATLY APPRECIATED. WE SINCERELY THANK YOU. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SURVEY, PLEASE CONTACT THE COUNCIL OF COMMUNnY SERVICES AT 985-0131. Tha Council of Community Services is a United Way Partner Agency. WE NOW ASKYOU TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS TO GIVE US SOME GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUTTHE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLETING THE SURVEY FORM. PLEASE DO NOT, HOWEVER, PUT YOUR NAME ON THE SURVEY IN ORDER TO PROTECT YOUR INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY. 1. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE THE WORD WHICH DESCRIBES YOUR RACE OR ETHNIC GROUP: 1. White 4. Asian/Pacific Islander 2. Black 5. Other 3. Hispanic/Spanish (Please specify) 2. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE YOUR AGE GROUP: 1. 18 or younger 3. 35 - 54 5. 65 and over 2. 19-34 4. 55-64 3. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE YOUR GENDER: 1. Male 2. Female -4- .l COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY SUMMER 1991 THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF CONCERNS AND PROBLEMS THAT ARE FACED BY MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE GO OVER THE LIST AND TELL US IF EACH ONE HAS BEEN: NOT A PROBLEM A MINOR PROBLEM OR A MAJ R PROBLEM FOR YOU OR ANY OTHERS LIVING IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS. IF YOU DON'T KNOW PLEASE CIRCLE THAT ANSWER. PROBLEM CIRCLE ONE ANSWER FOR EACH PROBLEM LISTED 1. Unable to afford child day care Not Minor Major Don't Know 2. Unable to find child day care Not Minor Major Don't Know 3. Unable to find after-school care Not Minor Major Don't Know 4. Children/teens having behavior/emotional Not Minor Major Don't Know problems 5. Physical abuse or fighting Not Minor Major Don't Know 6. Experiencing anxiety, stress or depression Not Minor Major Don't Know 7. Experiencing an alcohol abuse problem Not Minor Major Don't Know 8. Experiencing a drug abuse problem Not Minor Major Don't Know 9. Unable to find work Not Minor Major Don't Know 10. Unable to read Not Minor Major Don't Know 11. Unable to get transportation for handicapped Not Minor Major Don't Know person 12. Unable to get adult care for an elderly person Not Minor Major Don't Know 13. Unable to get home health care for an elderly Not Minor Major Don't Know person 14. Not having enough money to buy prescrip- Not Minor Major Don't Know tion medicine 15. Unable to afford medical insurance Not Minor Major Don't Know 16. Unable to pay water, gas or electric bill Not Minor Major Don't Know PROBLEM CIRCLE ONE ANSWER FOR EACH PROBLEM LISTED 17. Unable to afford dental care Not Minor Major Don't Know 18. Unable to pay for rent or mortgage Not Minor Major Don't Know 19. Not enough money to buy food Not Minor Major Don't Know 20. Not enough room for everyone living in your home Not Minor Major Don't Know 21. Living in a house/apartment needing a lot of Not Minor Major Don't Know repairs 22. Not enough money to buy clothing/shoes Not Minor Major Don't Know 23. Not knowing what resources are available in the Not Minor Major Don't Know community 24. Being afraid in my neighborhood Not Minor Major Don't Know 25. Unable to get landlord to make needed repairs Not Minor Major Don't Know THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN COMPLETING THIS FORM. YOUR EFFORT IS GREATLY APPRECIATED. IN THE EVENT YOU NEED HELP FROM THE EXISTING HUMAN SERV- ICES IN OUR COMMUNITY, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR TELEPHONE DIRECTORY UNDER COMMUNITY SERVICE NUMBERS OR CALLTHE INFORMATION & REFERRAL CENTER AT 982-234. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS SURVEY PLEASE CONTACT THE COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AT 985-0131. The Council of Community Services is a United Way Partner Agency. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z - 2- i WE NOW ASK YOU TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS TO GIVE US SOME GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE COMPLETING THE SURVEY FORM. PLEASE DO NOT, HOWEVER, PUT YOUR NAME ON THE SURVEY IN ORDER TO PROTECT YOUR INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY. 1. WHAT IS THE POSTAL ZIP CODE OF YOUR HOME ADDRESS? 2. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE THE STATEMENT WHICH DESCRIBES YOUR LIVING SITUATION/HOUSEHOLD: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Two or more adults without children Two or more adults with at least one child under age 18 One adult with at least one child under age 18 One adult living alone Other (please specify) 3. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE THE WORD WHICH DESCRIBES YOUR RACE OR ETHNIC GROUP: 1) White 2) Black 3) Hispanic/Spanish 4) Asian/Pacific Islander 5) Other (please specify) 4. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE YOUR AGE GROUP: 1) 18 or younger 2) 19 - 34 3. 35 - 54 5. 65 and over 4. 55 - 64 5. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE YOUR GENDER: 1. Male 2. Female 6. CIRCLE THE NUMBER BESIDE THE INCOME RANGE WHICH DESCRIBES THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF INCOME (INCLUDING SOCIAL SECURITY, SSI, ADC, RETIREMENT) RECEIVED LAST YEAR BY ALL THOSE LIVING IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD: 1. Less than $5,000 4. $15,000 - $19,999 2. $5,000 - $9,999 5. $20,000 - $24,999 3. $10,000 - $14,999 6. $25,000 -and over -3- ACTION NO. A-92491-3 ITEM NO. ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Policy Requiring Environmental Assessments for Real Estate Acquisitions COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SiJNIlKARY This report requests the Board to establish a County policy requiring environmental audits or assessments for real estate acquisitions. BACKGROUND• Over the past few years we have all become painfully aware of the threats and hazards to our environment and the tremendous financial and social costs of addressing environmental problems. This heightened awareness is reflected in a more cautious and careful analysis of the environmental risks inherent in real estate transactions. It is suggested that the Board adopt a policy for the County requiring environmental audits for all fee simple real estate acquisitions by the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Federal law imposes significant liabilities (strict liability, irrespective of fault) upon all parties deemed statutorily responsible for the release of hazardous substances. The current owner of the real estate is one of the parties responsible for cleanup costs. There is an "innocent landowner" provision to the "third party" defense, which protects an owner who did not know or have reason to know of prior contamination when the site was acquired. To prove absence of reason to know, one must have undertaken all appropriate inquiry into the ownership and uses of the property "consistent with good commercial or customary practice in an effort to minimize liability", determined by the standards at the time of the acquisition. ~.1.~` -~ In consideration of the current commercial and customary practice, staff issued a request for proposals to perform environ- mental audits on July 30, 1991, and received approximately 12 responses. This request divided the scope of work into two phases: to determine if the land is contaminated and requires further, more comprehensive, investigation; and, if warranted, testing, sampling, analysis and surveys to determine the extent and content of the contamination. Staff is prepared to conduct environmental audits on all fee simple real estate acquisitions by the County. Staff recommends that the Board adopt a policy directing that an environmental audit be conducted for all fee simple real estate acquisitions by the County, including donations or gifts. FISCAL IMPACTS• The costs for an environmental audit shall be billed on an hourly rate, and laboratory fees for testing and sampling is dependent upon the specific testing method requested, which shall be billed at cost. Depending upon the size or quantity of real estate involved, and the nature of the property (raw land vs. a building or structure, underground storage tanks, etc.) it is estimated that an environmental audit could cost at a minimum $1500.00. The cost of the environmental audit is billed to the request- ing or using department, just as survey fees, appraisal fees and recording costs are currently allocated. ALTERNATIVES• 1) Adopt a policy for Roanoke County requiring an environ- mental audit for all fee simple real estate acquisitions. 2) Do not require environmental audits, run the risk of potential environmental liability for real estate acquisitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board adopt a policy requiring an environmental audit of all fee simple real estate acquisitions. Respectfully submitted, -' l ~ '~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~~ Action Vote No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by Lee B. Eddy to Eddy x Denied ( ) approve Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x File cc: Reta R. Busher , Director, Management & Budget Paul Mahoney, County Attorney e:\wp5l\agenda\reakst\environ.ass Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 1 '-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for October 22. 1991. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance authorizing a Use Not Provided For Permit to allow a caretaker's mobile home in the campground, located at 5753 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dixie Caverns & Pottery, Inc. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on a 0.685 acre tract zoned M-1 and obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a taxi service located at 4909 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 2.15 acres from B- 3 to B-2 to construct a motel, located at the intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Relax, Inc. r ~ ~ -3 a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for October 22, 1991. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~_i ' ROANORE COUNTY "USE NOT PROVIDED FOR" PERMIT APPLICATION ~~ -.``/ 1. Name fk Dnfharv_ Tnc_~,_.~~~.~ 38C-2085 Applicant' s Dixie Cav~rrs ~, - - ;~ 5753 4d. Maia Street FFIC /~~ e LsRe ~'~ Address: Roa ~ Virg~.nia'2401 Zip:' ~ 18 alem Vir~inia t - ;r 5753 W. Main Street'; ~, ~ .. -` 2. Location of Property: r.-'~ ~, Salem, Virginia 34153`. _; - ~ ~•~~_ -~Q ~:,~= 63.04-1-1 Old Tax Map 1: NSA 3. Nev Tax Map ~: 4. Magisterial District Location: Cata~.~a 61.47 Acres acres/sq. ft. 5. Sise of Property: 7 acres/sq. ft. Size of Proposed Use Not Provided For: Existing Land Use: Dixie Caverns, Pottery, Campground Existing Zoning: A-I Agricultural 7. Proposed Land Use: One careta;cer's mowile :tome Core. 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: No 9. Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes Nor.? 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: 11. Value of Land: -- Value of tProposed) Buildings: -- 12. Value of Machinery ~ Tools: -- Number to be Employed: 13. Check Completed Items: X Consultation X Letter of Application X g}" x 11" Concept Plan Legal Forms X List of Adjacent Properties X Application Fee 14. Applicant's Signature: Pub is Hearing Notices Issued / / / r 15. Owner's Consent, if different than applicant: Name: Signature: -------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY: Hearing Date: Application Deadline: Received By: Board of Supervisors Rearing Date: Date Received: Action: ~iaie Caverns & Popery, ~nc. "Nature's Oum -Nature's Best" Office: 6020 Oriole Lane, S.W. Roanol~e. Virginia 24018 (703) 774.6419 County Board of Supervisors- P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Cavem &c Pottery: August 23, 1991 :;.~,-. ~-/ .. ~-- :,' 5753 W Main Streit Salem, Virginia 24153 (703) 380-5 Dear Board Members: As many of you know, along with the Cavern and Pottery Shop. we have a campground facility on about seven acres of the property. Along with the campground we provide bathroom facilities. ` In past years the old bathhouse vas not only used by our paying campers, but also by transients and young adults and anyone ~---.~ else passing by. This led to the deplorable condition of tihat bathhouse, because not only was that bathhouse fighting age, it was also fighting the constant abuse of sinks being tort from the walls, showers torn from the shower stalls, and all sorts C€ general vandalism. The county health department mandated our not reopening the existing bathhouse ~.-hich forced us to erect a new bathhouse ~~hich we opened in July of this year. Already a mirror has been broken and toilet paper sti:.ffed in the toilet. I am requesting that you allow a caretaker to move his mobile home onto the campground. This gentleman is in his late fifties and is employed as the raintainence person and grounds'ceeper. His lovely ti~ife has bee:: employed by Dixie Caverns for o~.~er t~~ years and ~rorks in the pottery building. 'They have a one ~•ear c:d mobile home and it could be placed near the bathhouse and far out of sight of the highway. I certainly have no intention of ma{ing tills a mobile home park, ~~ are an overnight campground. We are a small buisiness and have gone to an expense we di3 not need to incur at this time - we have also been effected by the slow economy. Please allow me to protect the campground and our new bathhouse by allowing me to put a caretaker on the property. Thank you . l~ ~~~~ ~~Lr ------- Connie T. Hausman, President _ ~ 1 ~'~ ~ ~ -! ~~ ~ ~~t/ l ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~ __ - -- ~_ ,- i . _~_ , -- ~~. `(~'' ~_ ' '~ ~' -t ---- -_ j t ;' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~, -~ C S, ~ ~, -- ~. C N _ ~ '~ ~/ ~, ~ ~ ~ --~ c~~ -, ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ---_ ~,, ~ ~~ T .~~ T ~~~ ~ ~'~~ . , S~ rE t:+ ~„ ,~ { ~Q s y ~, ~ ,Z~2 ~ s' ~ N~~ f3 ~9Ti-/ - a ~-~ ~ Sc ~~ -_ v ~ ~ , .~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ C. .~ ~,. 1,r r ~_ ~'y ~ ~~ V' ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION ~" /`' G' ~~ /J-r'~/ /~ _ Phone : ~ • ~,E~ ~/ G 1. Owner s Name: ~p n ~ Y1-~ ~~t- l/~ ? Y~'rs Address: ~~ f`' ',~' 2. Applicant's name: Address: Date Rec .: ~ `~' ( Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.. Phone: 3. Location of Property: Tax Map Number(s): 4. Magisterial Listrict: 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zon_ng: Existing Lan: IIse: 7. Proposed Zon_ng: Proposed Lance IIse: ' ~. ^./ ) ~G~,, ~ r 8. Comprehensiv= Plan Designation: 9. Are Conditio-s Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Lan and (Proposed) Buildings: /~~ L~G~U 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes end Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners ~~ of Pra~erty (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map ~L61b' Application Fee Written Proffers Water end Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's~ent: Signature Date 0 ' 2 ~" ~/ 1 .~ ~/~ ~~-- ~~~~ ROANORE COUNTY ~ Z "USE NOT PROVIDED FOR" PERMIT APPLICATION 1. Applicant's Name: `, °~s /~ /~(/~~/~~ ~~- Phone: S~~ /6~~ Address: ~~ ~ak ~ 7'" ~b ~U/~n~i K ~//.~. ~ T ~~~ U ~~ v~ /`-Q' Zip: T~~ 2. Location of Property: ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~~ ~7-~'S 3 . New Tax Map # : ~ _ ~ ~" ~ % O'ld Tax Map # 4. Magisterial District Location: CST t~y~~~/ 5. Size of Property: ~i ~O ~ acres/sq. ft. Size of Proposed Use Not Provided For: acres/sq. ft. 6. Existing Land Use: ~ ~~•~ Existing Zoning: 7 . Proposed Land Use: ~~ n i Ny ~~ ~l; ~v~L~ ~~ '~ XS.`5 trS d~ ~S 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~~/~-~ ~' % ~U ~~ 9. Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes Nc 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: 11. Value,of Land: Value of (Proposed) Building: 12. Value of Machinery & Tools: Number to be Employed: 13. Check Completed Items: Letter of Application Legal Forms ~'~ Application Fee ~lsl • 14. Applicant's Signature: 15. Owner's Consent, if different than Name: Signature: cant: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY: Application Deadline: Hearing Date: Received By: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: _ Consultation Date Received: Action: 8~" •x 11" Concept Plan List of Adjacent Properties Public Hearing Notices Issued ROAHOICE COONTY ~ ,..,,~,, OTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date ~ /~~ Name of Applicant ~`~ S ~ , /~~/hbf~ro~ ~/C Phone ,F, 2 /+~ ~~ Address of Applicant ~~ ~-~GX ~~~~ ~oiF~~ ~/). 2¢~~y Name of Developer Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Phone "-~ Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Name of Proposed Development .Z t--, Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) r /f~ Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map): ~9'G'~1 ~~ ~e .~a~~ Size of proposed development in acres: ~ ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that wi 1 be a part or section of a larger future development? ~ No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OSIER) Sig ature of licant HUBBARD SERVICE DEPARTMENT 4909 Cove Road NW P.O. Box 7426 Roanoke, VA 24019-0426 (703)562-1600 RM (703)483-8896 (70344-8888 FAX (703)562-0407 Virginia: Before The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Cove Road, N.W. ) Amended Proffer 49.26 Conditions Tax Map # 37.17-O1-OS ) 0.68 acre ) August 23, 1991 Petition of Tommy Hubbard, Jr. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. In accordance with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et set of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Tommy Hubbard, Jr., hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia certain conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. The conditions so proffered include three conditions initially proffered with the Petitioner's application, one condition set forth in that certain Amended Proffer of Conditions dated August 23, 1991 and an additional condition, all as follows: 1. No outside storage of materials. 2. Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. 3. Plant new shrubs in front of the building. 4. The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, administrative and other purposes reason- ably related to the activities above described. Also, this property will be used to operate a Taxi Cab service. 5. The total area of all business signs on the property will not at any one time exceed the sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot of street frontage and in no event more than 300 square feet, regardless of the number of lineal feet of street frontage. Respectfully submitted, Tommy Hubbard, Jr. a ~ ,~~ . r August 23, 1991 LETTER OF APPLICATION We propose to operate a 24 hour Taxi Cab service operated at 4909 Cove Road, Roanoke, Va. We plan to start with two cabs radio dispatched with the company name of Star City Cab, Inc, owned and operated by Tommy Hubbard, Jr. Sin rely, ~~ - Tommy Hubbar , J Owner ----,~A~ ..~.~w!.~~.c ^'o' ~-}~"-~?r.~Y r 1t. rJJ' fir -y+w•>. '~. .- i! 1. ii tt ` r ; `_ ~ _ ~ ,_, .~. ` E •~ f ,.yr~~ ~>y~'~µt'r+ hr .A~`. ,~ ~'~ C ~~ ~ C`je ~: .IR~F,9 ~y3, W~l ~.~,wY~*}} .F ) ay.4 $},~ . ~ ,-` ~7Ji=s `• .~~',~~~/.'y~-~~~..}~~~Yg~,A+YJ~I.'~t .i~\~YjV $ - Oa'r~tlx ~ } ~ ~' r, d • j; is '"c`~~+' :'t °~ '~ orar r!!b9 4rs[fd y ~ t , ~ -.y,4 $ ~~ +~....,r~tl~ ~~~ ~° c ' x )Y,! 14,r~ o ~p j ~ owed ~ ~ '. ~ ,. y:'. ; i r'.''vi. ~- 5- .~-,.r~ Y! w ~ 3~.+~>!~" g ~~~i s s ..•] 9M1l HI ~ Sa3L3d ~ . ~.r a D + ~O ~ ` ~ .i3 .] c..~ {'rn9 lMUigy ~~ ~ D ~j 1~ y i s ~ Ds,lwvlys! d Om7 71fi7 • ~ _ S ~~ - ~ a w~ U w~ ~ O i N {SN D . tc.. ~ •s. BY~ U~MAHY) NJ,M v .. ,°, vv D ~ < Q = ~ jOfOrd lU. hou ~ o uui°n liiaY~ `'~.~.((a 1= p ~V i 2 K J O YN ~ - .icep ~ ~ ~ 7 O ~ 1~' < V 4 a i t s w 0 i .e8~ IAOHVOH ., : ~ ~d a~~rpr u.aNi ~ NOOW T ~ i~ w~ . J ~~ ~ w c ~ ~ ~ 7 r.!!'4 ~ ! ... ~ .: .. ~ _- - - ~~ 09'~~oHnot~ OwV~4/ Ni ~~y ~. - IO'!~ I ,• ~1., 1 19 tI ` ars~rv M sl+h ~ y r , - ; ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~,~ ~ ~ 4x~~~ 2 w. ~°:~ ~z }°~~ o z ., Q ~ c ' -~ N o e• .'~. N ~tiT ti~ h eb. !~* ~e 0 .t~'a\o\'.~ :~,~ ~ ~ ;.. I .. o ry ~F py .. ~K Y r=~1t[ rv_ ry tX : •~ $, ~- ,o ~ .. ~. _. r. a w ~• i.- i=r w o a rw ,i> j V M~ -rte Vw r ~~: i ~o i0~/ih ~'9 ~ ~~_ S`o~ ~ _ t I .. . i bq 'i ~'`. ra '~`. o Q ~~tpe~a {.tea ~'~F~~ -_ " ; N y^ . r r~ . ~y ~ rj7~~. r ~ ~ i +", t~)7I1{I ~ i (M ~r ; ~~ .00•~~ ~ a;*~.L ~-}gN .Tag :/Ly~J _ ~ j1 .. \; ~~. / 11Ik)N1/ d. M.Of.It.tf4' " ; _- ` '? `~ .e /' of ~AvranJ~, unca _ ~• ~ ~J" - .. Y/0Al IN,MS13Jl l1,tJ • - r- `~~ " snrn 1 v ~ _ ~ 9w1ur0 ,~ll).33 ~ O z r _ ~ ~~ ?~ 8 € ~ JNr~ ~ ~~ ~ e ~, ~ ate o u ~° a ~# ~ p;~ o w'. !w ~O] ~ ~ i ~ ~ 0 ~ W ~- i ~L -w "' `~ p _-Z. _ - ~ .~.• o ~°, , .00043 m . - ~, a.z[.~fN O (7) !-N U3N01 N017U1dti1 ~+ Nf7d27~ 10-s0•ElYf, rr/ R ~ r s '~F YI ~:. ~~ 9 .; ~gl; , f N '. Q ~ -~ ~~ ou ~Z I~ a i~~ ' ^~:a ~~ L ~ E~~•~ ~ ~~ 1 ~~ z g Z ~. ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION Date Rec. :~~ Received By:~ Case No.• Ord. No.: 1. Owner' s Name : Re'-ax, Inc . c/o Jay Patel Phone : 703-366-7681 Address : 7120 Wil~i.amson Road 2. Applicant's Name: Relax, Inc. c/o Jay Patel Address : 7120 Williamson Read Phone: 703-366-7681 3. Location of Property Intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane Tax Map Number(s) : 18.18-2-5 4. Magisterial District: Hollins 5. Size of Property: 2.15 acres 6. Existing Zoning: B-3 Existing Land Use: 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2 Proposed Land Use : Motel 8. Comprehensive P:an Designation: Principal Industrial 9. Are Conditions ?coffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land a^:d (Proposed) Buildings: Uniteroved 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: X Letter of Application X Concept Pla- X Metes and Bounds Description X List of Adjacent Owners X of Property (Attach Exhibit A) X Vicinity Ma? Application Fee Written Pro=fers X Water and Sewer Application (If Applic<~le) 12. Signature Of Prperty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature Date G Co~n~ercial - vacant August 23, 1991 ~a~ ~ e a v/ _3 ~- ~ ~. Z ~o rn -c w ~,,,~ I t ~ ~ •~~ p,U ~ n y; v~C ~W p 70 ~ s in3 r.~ p p Z N ~ U< Z ~= ~ ~~ ~~ c? a ~Z w<,=_ ~ ~ ~ Wiz ,.. ° -.. a. ° ai. 0 d Z Z< ~O Y Z ~ < '~ J 5 m '' 0 1^w+-w t ~-~ w Oi~ C ~ ~2rc~ a 'R~ ~ at' O z v+ °? e W '^ X < o o N o Q iu ..-,.r-+ a ~ ~ v o~~ ~ZN~3 z° ~ ~ Z sY o ..~ a o < o~,wo o ~ r~ii~'z i ~ o .I ZO o~ r ~ i T = ~ ~w ~•~ .. ~. w R \ F~ u 3 Z ,n ~_'. Z R T ~~ . •)„7 .~ . -. c4 .iZ.lF -/A~ Win:; `'t l~ ,1 fi ~ : s N `\ ,,, Sri/,i ~~ ,. ~ t` S ~ ~. ,M Q,. F V+ r Q c~ ^ ~ ` Sv~3i~~ ~_. C~ ~ ~ ~~`~`~~~ ~ U ~0~r .,~ JE~~ Oa~4 y" .<,n ~ ivi Q- •` 0~ ~ o, ~ T r ~ 4 O ~~Wnti CI ~ O~C O ~'I >z N ~~_` +~ Q Z I 4 ~ yam, <Q Y °p U2 ~m^ ~ ~ \\ ZU C Y n <xm ° 7d~ 0~5 \ / 47 U J~o ~ o~ Pa Va /~ F 47 ~~ n_o o Q W O .. / z n do ~ V °zo / ~. siv e ., / W ~~n 2 ~ : / / / -'O / ~A!'j O fy,J1~ ~ 99 V O / / /' ~ ti b2 Wm ~ Oar. // ~(~ .'ti ~ O~Z? W ~ P / /~ / ~ ryT :~~ 1 1WJ rc == 1 /. ~~~ / J O W W O ~~~& a z ~ 1 ~I O V < < W ~ Ct W YY / ,~,c~ 1 111 O OZ t ~ ~ ~ i ~ v vi RJ ~ ~ / ~ / tie /\v' b ' , '~ . v. O W W -1 ~" t\~i. ~ ~ JP V z i'i~ Zn ~V~rc~Z 7~ 000/~/ W :, W 0~•' 16 om3~ <' 207 z<~Z f ' j n c V / / ~f < z O FY~V V~ / ~ a ~- °~S ~' S^ ~ shoo&o7~ 15 ~ Q c e Q QO ~ ~ ° ~z= ut '~ n ,ri 2 ' ~y n / ~~oo'•9n ~ ooao~oz~ 1 a• y ~i`v ? ~` N _ N ~~= O anon me J ~t Q°a/ 1P .' W ,}a ?2 .` r W IZ . ~ ~ i. -- 0 ~~ h t?.?~ r ~ 70, .~ . ~~OW Pn 7e t0/ z a W ~i ~ 3 91 Miy ei \ O~2 ~y a~ c o 0 o n 8 i V O ~ .z M n ~ < ~Zo z o ~ ? ~k ` ° a <°na~ W< S O _ ~ ~as a 1 g Y ~~ WnN 0 ~ CWf W ~ = \ ~ U~ N m O 8 ~ ]~ZV O O _ P 3 JU 4~2 < ~~ ~ ~ F N<D: ~ , 3Y O ~m ~t C~ _ ` ~rKnvi ZZC < W°,°--~ O :w W iorom,J ° g 1G a c~ < $c 3 V s0 i r pZN_ ~~ ^ ~ Z=Ri V V £ °~ O . ¢ ~ W¢~~ ~~,n~ U F~j °ti W4pN ~ '~ ~ ~^' i WO O V'Q ~1J< n d CYr ~i e" ~+ 2?W <U ~7 n _ O.y ~N ~ p ~ 1 ~ L ~ JJ zVOUip ~ ~ '~jf£ pOp~ C) ~O~G O~[ ?~ m p ~<m ,-o .~ ~~ zV 1O 3 O O + ~ N ~WQ ~ _ y~~ Jp3~V ~ FN y O 4 ~~'~°> W O a L~l N~GI . Of F ~ '' ~ QoK ^ A~ a ~ ~i<~ ~ F 2_ C~'zQ w J ¢¢ m e O ri ,- s I x Ws Z m t~N ~~ ~ Lit °n'°"zya°aiWi<' ~ ~iR m< - 2 n o° y,F (, ~. . uu0m~,ri~~ Yzt '.l m~ ~ Y w T OpR3~aN3 30 VQ+- ° ~y ~Ofe Rm 6 ~ i~J40W~~I 1IW W~CO ~ F Y~ ~1~1 IJ I1~ n N~tl~awry ~v M ~~~ LAW OFFICES DODSON, PENCE. VIAR, WOODRUM & MACKEY FOURTw FLOOR S `aN E7 BAhx BUILDING 7E lEPNONE E. GR.`FI7'" C)O DSON. JR. ':3 345-OS26 RIC WARD F_ PENCE ,^. CwURCw AVENUE. S. W. RICNARD E. VIAR a^,57 OFFICE BOx 1371 7ELEFAX CLIFTON A. yy00DRUM. III -_3~ 3423788 G. NELSON MACKEY. JR. RCAN OKE, VIRGINIA 24007 MARS L. POLETTI ANNE C. GROVE August 23, 1991 Roanoke County Planning Department 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Re: Application for Rezoning Gentlemen: This application is for the purpose of requesting a rezoning of property located on the corner of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane, consisting of approximately 2.05 acres, from B-3 commercial classification to B-2 commercial classification. The owner of this property, Relax, Inc. , c/o Jay Patel, desires to construct a motel, designed and franchised by the Hampton Inn corporation, headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee. Information about the Eampton Inn franchise is available for your review upon request. This land is designated a 'Principal Industrial' area according to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan, (the "Plan"), and corresponding zoning for such classification includes B-2 and B-3 commercial in addition to M-1, M-2, M-3 industrial. It is necessary to rezone the property in order to comply with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance B-2 Commercial District Permitted Uses for construction and operation of a hotel/motel. The adjacent properties are a mixture of both B-2 and B-3 and the intended use of the property in question is compatible with the surrounding business establishments. The factors to be examined, in accordance with the Plan, include existing land use patterns and zoning, potential industrial growth, water and sewer, access, etc. This area of Roanoke is suitable for commercial growth due to the geographical characteristics, existing businesses and the close proximity to the Interstate highway. Only one other hotel/motel exists within a 1 mile radius to this property, and there are no restrictions on record which limit development of a motel or similar business. We ask for this rezoning from B-3 to B-2 and will be happy to accommodate additional requests for information. ~ -3 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, ~ l Anne C. Grove Attorney for Relax, Inc. ACG/kp Enc~psures cc: Mr. Jay Patel ~` ~~ i~ ~: GtI;IA i~ ~~ !i i J ,~ ., c Y O ~ ~W° ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ W ~ ~ .~ w `~ ~ ~ ~ t \~.~ ~~0~ ~ ~~ ~~\V Y ~ '~ ~ -~ e .~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ O Z - ` i Z .. 2S ~ { ~• i ~ O~ / Q ~ a ~; r _ o ~ /// ~ • Z ~o~--- , T § Q ~ c . tS ter-.. ~ ~ ~ ~ L c ~ ! -~ ' t o~.-~ ~ --. ~ ~ ; ~ --~ ~ e ~` '~'; o b ~' ~~ \ ~ dl .~~, ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ n o, ~ j ~ 0 1~ i ,, ~' it ,, i .! ~` . ~-~ ~ Pry ~ I / ~ : / ~ ~ ~ ~ p .~ / ~ ~, ': ~~ It ~ ~ f F • a~ ~ ^ ~- '~ .~ ~ ~~ K; ~: c~ ~~ • , ~, 1~ ~o v~ Z'i ti z ~. ~~ J'i~?~' ~.~ e ~~~ ~< N ~ .~ _ ~^ ~' ~ w J ~ U ~~ V ~ ~ U~ G ~ tai' . '.~ J ~. G ~~~4 1 . c.0'd E,I:~i IboI-SI- ~3 6. WATER AND SEWER APPLICATION ATTACHMENT (Recorded copy of water easement included) C 3 ROAHOICE COONTY OTILITY DEPARTl~BN? APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date _~ ~ ~ 1991 Name of Applicant ~~~ Ir~c • c/o Jay Patel Phone 366-4681 Address of Applicant 7120 ~~i.lliamson Road Name of Developer Jay Patel Phone 366-7fi81 Address of Developer 7120 Williamson Road AP Architection Name of Design Engineerc/o Abhay Pradhan phone 704-563-0937 Address of Design Engineer 6407 Idlewild Road, ~~500, Charlotte, North Carolina Name of Contact Person Acme C. Grove, Attorney for Relax, Inc. Name of Proposed Development Hampton Inn Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Motel: 52 traits with parking, lobby and pool. 'Itao floors, each floor containing 10,000 square feet. Total area equals 2.05 acres. Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map): Corner of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane Size of proposed development in acres : 2.048 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use DSGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL *Please see attact~ents Is this apglication for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? R No Yes :f yes, provide map of entire area if available. (oVE~) ~. • WATER AND 5'FidQt APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS ~ °"3 An 8}" x 11" photocopy of the appropriate USGS contour map should be submitted with t,~le application. A photocopy of the USES may be obtained from the Roanoke County Engineering D?partanwnt at no charge. For those parcels that are within the area covered by the serer and water planimetrics and are less than 20 acres in size, an 8}"x11" photocopy of the appropriate planimetric should be submitted. This copy may be obtai~i fran the Engine°r- ing Department at no cost. However, if the applicant desires to have the entire planimetric copied, there will be a charge of S2. It is the developer's responsibility to ensure that these maps are attached to the application and t.°lat the parcel as correctly delineated. After it is receives, rile application for water and sewer wlll be forwarded to tatie Roanoke County Utility Department for evaluation of the present sys_~11 capacity at the point of the proposed connection. This information will be includes in the staff report submitted for review to the Board of Supervisors and Planning Cocmiissiorl. Any questions with regard to the water and sewer application should be made to Roanace County Utility Department, 1206 Kessler Mill Road; Salem, VA 24153; glove 387-5104. 772-2080 Drafting Depar~ent Examples of oiniam acceptable information for Contour Mapa Telephone convtTSatior. Example A: Portion of Sever Planimetric. Required when the parcel !s less than nth Todd BOOM 20 acre and vithia the areas covered by the eater and sever planimet:•ics. $_19-91 EXAt0?LE B: Portion of USGS C~tour Map. Required when the parcel is greater th$ 8_20_(~l 20 acres or outside of the areas covered by the eater and sever • oh~Ltrlcs. ~~~ 3~ Map Number: TANB ~j1 ..y ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ J ~ ~, a ~. -~-,- -; ~ ~d~ ~~`\ f ~, Z ~ ` '. ~ aa~ ~~. ~ ~ O , ~ _ ~ _ ~~" . . ,~ _~ ; .~ ,, ~ ~-~ `~ • ~ ~A9 ~•` ~ 1 1 ..-. ~~. r _ ` ` J. ` ~ .v • -r~\ ~2 ~ ~ ,~ d~ ~ .~^ . 3 } r- ,y~` x~. ~ l _ ( ~, . ----~ 1! ~ ~ ~ ~ \ i~ ~~ - - \_ ~ l ~. . ~b ~ _ , , moo- ~. •- - o ~ ~ ,~~ _"'~y 1 J ' t _ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ +o Wa-~ ` '~ n ~ ~~ t: -r ~ .. 1~ ,.. ~~s ,/ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~` ~ ~ ~ r i ~i~~ N ~ ,~ ~ ,s~ _ .~ . _ . -s_.. _- R.~ ~ "~ r 4:.a~ _ J ~ ~ ~. 1143 ~~ ~-- - -+ .N / ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ s' ~ ~ I - ~_~ \ ; ~Cr O ~ \ J- ~' 1 `~ I + / 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ °'~ ~~. ,., ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ '- ° ~ 4 ti~\~ \ \\ \~1 ~ SZ '. ~, ~ ~, . O ~a ~. .; N '• 0 ~ I O O '-_` ~~ _\ ~ _ - ~ - ~ _ '' ` O ~~ . o ~ `~ a ~~ O ~-- ;~. , ~ a~ /,+h ~~~ ~ ~i ~ ti ~/~ Q _.p t ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,. .~"` ~~ ~o . \9Z ~ < ,. „ L~ ~ o i' ~ / }, f f ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ' 'rr~ / v / r' v Y _.. ~ t ~ ^" ~ ~ ~. r ~ '/ ~ ~ ~ / ! ~ _~ i r 1 - '' • ~ ' ~. ~ ~.~ ~ i ~ / ~ ~ ~~ ,ai ~ --- C~ 3 1 ~ } F •, ~ •t t ~ ~ t, o~ ~ ~, z ~~~, r-~ z 1 ~ Q i I ~ ~, s ~ 5 t~ i ~~°~m ~ ~ ~ <~~~ LA „~. t'Z~ END ,;l~ /~Cf?tiiC:C~ (rC:~e: T/ G-3 NORTB Relax, Inc. c/o Jay °atel COM11lUNITY SERVICES 6 - 3 to r _ 2 AND DBVBLOPMENT 1 a . is-2 -5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE 92491-4 AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, A PORTION OF GREEN HILL PARR, TO THE ROANORE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park as shown on Exhibit "A" attached to this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991. The second reading on this matter was held on September 24, 1991. 2. That it is in the County's best interests to lease this property to the Roanoke Symphony Association in order to assist the Association in its charitable, benevolent, and educational purposes by providing facilities for its fund-raising activities. In exchange for the authorization to utilize a portion of Green Hill Park, the Roanoke Symphony Association will undertake substantial and valuable improvements to this County real estate. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None 1 A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Assessment Recreation 2 ,, ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, A PORTION OF GREEN HILL PARK, TO THE ROANOKE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This ordinance would authorize the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park to the Roanoke Symphony Association. BACKGROUND• On April 9, 1991 the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to execute an agreement with the Roanoke Symphony Association for the use of Green Hill Park for its annual major fund raising event, the polo match. As a result of discussions between attorneys representing the Association and the County Attorney, the execution of a formal lease between the parties appears to protect the interests of all concerned. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 18.04 of the Charter for Roanoke County requires that the granting of a lease to use public property be accomplished only by ordinance. The first reading of this proposed ordinance will be held on September 10, 1991; the second reading will be held on September 24, 1991. This lease agreement identifies that portion of Green Hill Park over which the Association shall have exclusive use each year for the annual polo cup and related functions, grants the right for non-exclusive use of the park for additional fund-raising events (subject to the County's normal schedule of events), addresses the mutual responsibilities of the parties, and imposes certain termination and liability insurance requirements. The Association has scheduled the polo cup for October 4 and 5, 1991. f-/- / FISCAL IMPACTS• The County shall be responsible for normal maintenance, removal of soccer goal posts, benches and other structures from the property during the Association's use of the property, providing a yard hydrant for potable drinking water, providing electrical service, and installation and removal of approximately 1200 bleacher seats and 20 picnic tables. In addition, the County is incurring a one-time expenditure of funds and in-kind services to assist in the preparation of the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~ `gym . `~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by cc: Jim Jones Reta Busher Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs c:\wp51\agenda\realest\polo.rpt H- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, A PORTION OF GREEN HILL PARK, TO THE ROANOKE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park as shown on Exhibit "A" attached to this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991. The second reading on this matter was held on September 24, 1991. 2. That it is in the County's best interests to lease this property to the Roanoke Symphony Association in order to assist the Association in its charitable, benevolent, and educational purposes by providing facilities for its fund-raising activities. In exchange for the authorization to utilize a portion of Green Hill Park, the Roanoke Symphony Association will undertake substantial and valuable improvements to this County real estate. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\reakst\polo.cup 1 f ./ ~, m~ [`! Z t D O N '1+ O ~ < . v m . \ ~• ~ m O ~ z f m i 1 x z z ~ cro ~~cc M r. s c s > t. ~ _ , r q ~ ~,~= m ~ ~ ^y~`} m Z F,.~a g ~~k- ,~ -~,~~ . T-<>;, m m ~ \ ~. ~. m ~~ Q > ~ ~-~ ~xm~T mu D m \~;i [oppp~ y n D Z_ m ~ S x u Z~ m ~ ('! r v i- /1 i ~ . `, ` ~~ 1 ---. 1~, _ / ~ ~. ~ ~ Ci rr(O T _, \`\`' ~~, . ~~~~ Q~ v~ ~ S S i~ ~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~~m $b~ or ~ ~~ ~~.~~ +~ y ; . j~'Y ~~ ~ n g Q 11.~ ( '~~ ''F~''11l jpp Co ti O Z s o ~ ~l-+ f / •'~ T O D m S v o FFL F ~ / r Q ., 6 ~ v ~~ ~ j.l ~~ ~~ . R ~ ~" m ~~ r r • ~ n / __ ~ ~ ~ T Q O O I (sj D S T ~ ~ n A ~ T x r 1 T ~ Q ~ T o 1 9 .. _ _ .. ._ . .... . .. .. ...... v ~ . ... iYJ v JG ~~~ ~ ~~ Fir C~~~p~~~~®~ ~r~l~ Sub~~~~~ THIS AGREEMENT dated this ~ day of _ . > ~y and between BOARD OF SUPERVISORS QF RQANOKE GOUNTY, VIRGINIA (hereinafter "County"), and ROANO~E SYMPHpNY ASSOCIATIQN (hereinafter "Association"). IN CONSIDER,ATIOIV of rental payments in the amount of One Dollar `per year reserved by the County, and in further consi eration o e promises contained herein and other good and valuable considera#aon, the County agrees to lease the following described Property to the Association, on the terms and conditionB set forth below. 1, Property. The Property consists of the new Polo Field and appurtenant land located in Green Hill Park, as shown on the drawing attached as Exhibit A, 2. E$+olusive Use. The Association shall have the exclusive use of the Property, without additional charge, for the Association's annual Polo Cup and related functions, Commencing each year with the initial site preparation and set-up. The period of time set aside for the Association's exclusive use of the Property shall not exceed 14 days (unless extraordinary circumstances prevent the prompt removal of the Association's personal property and all rented and borrowed property upon conclusion of the Polo Cup and. related functions). The period of exclusive use of the Property shall be speC~"ied by the Association on an annual basis with at least 90 days notice to the County and i$ expected to occur between September 15 and Octo~ 15 of each year. 3. Nou-exclusive Use. The Association shall have th,e right to use the Property, without additional charge, far additional fund-raising events and activities throughout the year; however, the Association must reserve the Property at least ~b days in advance, and the Association's additional use of the Property shall be subject to the County's normal schedule of events involving the Property. D _ the term of this lease, the County shall not permit the Property to be used for any polo match or polo exhibition other than the Association s annu o a up, vnt u the written consent of the Association. 4. Termfnat~vn. The term of tkds lease shall extend through December 31, 2011, and shall automatic y renew t ere er on a year-to-year as~e (Januar 1 throu h ]~eeember 31) unless either party gives at east fi man g wzltten notice of termination. Upon termination, t ~s eases not a renews e Property is then required for any of the purposes mentioned in Section 15.1-25$ of the Code of Virginia (1950), ag amended. Upon termination, all improvements erected thereon by the Association shall revert to the County and shall be free from any encumbrance placed thereon by the Association, The Association may terminate this lease at any time by giving written notice thereof to the County. by/Gt7/y 1 ~~y ~ 18 MO:~S & kOC'OV [ CH ~ ~~3 For D~~~~~~~®~ ®nly N~ 5. Reaponaibilitiee of the Associa~~i ~ p~'~is lease, the Association shall be responsible for the following, (a) Development of the Polo Field. (b) All applicable permits and licenses. (c) Maintenance during the Association's use, including trash pick-up and repair of damage to field caused by horses or guests. (d) Security during use of Property by the Association. (e) Porto johns as needed. or required by law. (f) Compliance with the Roanoke County Ordinance re_gul.ating conduct in County Parks, Chapter 1S, Roanoke County Code. (g) Annual overseeding within fifteen (1.5) days after the conclusion o e exc usive use; wit~~ a' sQe m~~ture a~'-rp oved:_by the._. Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation. 6. Respon~ibi~lities of the County. During the term of this lease, the County shall be responsible for the following; (a) Normal maintenance of the Property in accordance with the County's written maintenance standards, except durixag tie _ Association's exclusive use of the Property. However, t~ standards of maintenance shall equ ar exceed-tf~e ~ presen~Iy existing U.S, Falo .P~ssociation's suggested maintenance standards for polo fields. (b) R.amoyal of the soccer goal posts,_ benchos and other structures from the _ Property during _the Assacia_tion's use of the Property if these items conflict with the use .of the Prnperty for polo. All such improvements on the~Property rriust be cornp~etely r©movab a in or er to proV'i~ _ a s e e d~`or p in attar ante with the U.S. Polo_ Assooia_tion's suggested_ „standards for polo fields. In particular, all iz~-ground cleaves or __ retainers must be installed at sufficient depth to allow a covering of sod to be~l,acesLo~er t~iem-`d~ii-~r-~ig,A~~oc~a~'~on s use of the (c) Providing a yard hydrant for potable drinking water during the Assoaiation's use of the Property. (d) Providing electrical service during the Association's use of the property. (e) Installation az~d, removal of approximately 1200 bleachez~ seats far use by the Association. (~ Installation and removal of approxiiuately twenty picnic tables for use by the Association. 7. Iuaur~nce. The Association will provide liability insurance coverage far Association staff and guests during the Association's use of the k'roperty, The Association will require each Polo player and each individual working with the ~; 09i2F~i91 c~y.29 MOSS & kOCOVICH For ~ 004 - ~, RAFT horses to (a) provide For his or her own insurance covers ~~°°` handling of horses and equipment, or (b) sign a release agreement releasing the Association and/or the County from all liability. In addition, the Association will provide general liability insurance coverage in the minimum-amount of $1,000,000.00 _ naming the County as an additional _insured. _The execution of this lease by_-the_ County and the Association's use of the Property. shall not~constitute a waiver of anY _ _. ---- `. - a$ amen3ec~. ixmnuniti$s granted b~Section _15.1~~1. of the o -e ° '--- ~rgn~a .-_ , _ ---.... . 8. Niiacellan~eous. This agreement shall be binding an the parties end may not be amended or modified without the written agreement of a]l parties in accordance with applicable law. The County warrants that there has been full comp]iance with the require~oaents of Section 15.1-61.1 of the Code of Virginia (1990), as amended, and with the requirements of Section 18.04 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke. 9. Assignment. This lease may not be assigned by the Association to any third party without the County's written consent. However, this restriction. shall not apply to the assignment of this lease by the Association to a similar corporation or foundation whose primary purpose is to support the Roanoke Symphony Qrchestra, nor shall this restriction prevent the merger, consolidation or other corporate reorgani2atian of the Association provided the surviving entity's primary purpose ig to support the Roanoke Symphony Qrchestra. ~-~ --- _ __. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: SEAL Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By Title: SEp~, Roanoke Symphony Association By Title: ._.. _.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE 92491-5 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A 13.88 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND (TAX MAP NO. 65.00-2-55) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER PUMP STATION WHEREAS, in order to construct a treatment plant intake and pump station at Glenvar in connection with the Spring Hollow Reservoir, staff has located a certain parcel of land consisting of 13.88 acres, more or less, in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Homer J. Duncan currently holds a contract to purchase said parcel from the owners, George W. and Esther H. Hartless; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcel from Homer J. Duncan for the sum of $69,300, being the estimated fair market value based upon an appraisal; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; the second reading was held on September 24, 1991. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Homer J. Duncan (or the present owner if necessary) a 13.88-acre parcel of land identified as Tax Map No. 65.00-2-55 for an amount not to exceed $69,300, which shall be paid out of the funds available for the Spring Hollow Water Project. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Y ~ , ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Acquire a 13.88 Acre Parcel of Land for Construction of a Water Pump Station COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : /~~-y~,~.,,,Q BACKGROUND: The permit issued by the State and Army Corp of Engineers for the Spring Hollow Reservoir includes construction of a treatment plant intake at "Glenvar." Staff has selected a parcel of land that will be suitable for the Glenvar intake and has negotiated a purchase price with the owner. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The parcel selected for the location of the Glenvar intake and pump station is Tax Map No. 65.00-2-55. The parcel contains 13.88 acres and has approximately 1900 feet of frontage on the Roanoke River. This parcel meets the requirements of a "Glenvar intake" as required in the Spring Hollow Reservoir Permit. Additionally, the County will need a 40 foot easement through this property for construction of a water and sewer line to serve the West County area. The Roanoke River frontage will also serve as a river front greenway that is not available on the opposite bank of the river. The agreement of sale for this property is contingent upon satisfactory results of an environmental survey and final approval by the Board of Supervisors. Staff has obtained a property appraisal for this parcel from Mr. Earl Robertson, MAI, SRA of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. The market value including improvements is $69,300. The first reading was held on September 10, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available within the Spring Hollow Water Project from which to purchase this land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ` / -~ Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading authorizing the acquisition of the 13.88 acre parcel of land at the fair market value of $69,300. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor aig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A 13.88 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND (TAX MAP NO. 65.00-2-55) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER PUMP STATION WHEREAS, in order to construct a treatment plant intake and pump station at Glenvar in connection with the Spring Hollow Reservoir, staff has located a certain parcel of land consisting of 13.88 acres, more or less, in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Homer J. Duncan currently holds a contract to purchase said parcel from the owners, George W. and Esther H. Hartless; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcel from Homer J. Duncan for the sum of $69,300, being the estimated fair market value based upon an appraisal; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; the second reading was held on September 24, 1991. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Homer J. Duncan (or the present owner if necessary) a 13.88-acre parcel of land identified as Tax Map No. 65.00-2-55 for an amount not to exceed $69, 300, which shall be paid out of the funds available for the Spring Hollow Water Project. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in /-~-°~ this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\realest\duncan 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~. ,_ . ~ . ADDRESS ~ ~ ~,` ~ -. ,r, PHONE . I11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~.r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Grievance Panel Three-year term of alternate Cecil Hill will expire October 12, 1991. 2. Industrial Development Authority Four-year term of William Triplett will expire September 26, 1991. Supervisor Nickens advises that the Vinton Town Council will make a nomination for appointment to the Authority at its next meeting on October 1, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: ~2_a~~ y .1~- Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ `~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION 92491-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September 24, 1991, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board and Grievance Panel. 2. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer, from Section 22. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2. 4. Donation of a water, sewer and drainage easement from David L & Diane L. Caldwell. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program. 6. Acceptance of 0.05 miles of Lange Lane in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Donation of a drainage easement in connection with Suncrest Heights Subdivision, Section 3. 8. Approval of Raffle Permit for Oak Grove Elementary School PTA. 9. Settlement of contract dispute with GTE/Vision Tech regarding CAD software package. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Bingo/Raffle Permit File A-92491-6.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and Grievance Panel. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the September 10, 1991 meeting. Community Corrections Resource Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Mrs. James A. (Chris) Pickard to serve a one-year term as an alternate member. Her term will expire August 31, 1992. Grievance Panel Supervisor Nickens nominated Cecil Hill to serve a two-year term which will expire September 27, 1993. Mr. Hill previously served as an alternate member of the Grievance Panel. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Appr ved by, `~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ es~r ~/ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk -------------------------- County Administrator ----- ACTION ---- ------------------- VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Harry C Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Community Corrections Resource Board File Grievance Panel File r :~ ACTION # A-92491-6.b ITEM NUMBER ~." ~ ~° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~,~,.( h~ ~T"t"~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22, Old Heritage Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22, dated July 28, 1989, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $32,000. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary sewer facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22 along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ` ~ 2 SUBMITTED BY: Clifford 'g, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( x) Motion by: Harr C' _ Ni c-kPn~ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x to Nickens x Robers x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections j DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIC,NMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 28th day of March, 1990, by and between: Old Heritage Corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public uti 1 ity, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plans entitled: Hunting Hills Section 22 dated June 20, 1986 made by Lumsden Associates Hunting Hills Sewer from Section 22 dated July 28, 1989 made by Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the County and rill perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrus~ent to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: By Approved as to form: County Attorney County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia Elmer C. Hodge Tit 1 e : ~,~ er--~'l~~Q ~~0 . By: '~_ ' ` Title : _Y~c ~ /Q--,~~~ State of : ~ ~ ' County/City of: ~ to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: a? 9 ~`~- day of 19 Duly authorized officer Title on behal f of l?~.a~ L Notary"Public My Commission expires: a9. /9 9'~ State of: County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed rr~as acknowledged before me this: day of i9 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County ~inistrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: t ~ ~:QivtKiwi: ~" a - - - - a~ ' •. ~o ~., ~((pvyJ) DP _ / ~' y I ~ , - s "~''`_ --;-: - ~--.a~~ MR VICINITY MAP - _ ------- ~ „_:~:; . •~ . NORTB :?~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 9 \~A - ~F - ~ \ ~ - ~`° ~ > +•a t-'q ~ , sWac '~ ~•x,r ,~ .. 1 ~ ' ' Jr%~//~~ •~ ~~ .f/ ry ~~ ``t\ ~lt ~V/ a ' i iil•TIUO - ~ swwrtww, V' LpstNWT ~ 4 s111I. iiMli ... /~~~~- ~~ ~ ~ `e~earLwun ` . ~ t _ -MAMNSLI i / ~ IM WI[ •Il / ~ ~ ,~~y ..wwe.w~rn ~ _~- n a / o bu / . t a anon xw i% ~ ` r W ~ N / ~ ~ ~Nf 'fl 1 ~ ~ - ' r y ~ ~ Mi M4YMW !b MA 1 1I1T64I/[i/j - fllsvl[ V i/Il.Il, *F[ QI/NL. tW[/•!t!, F , • ~ _ yt I ~ i~ W ~ k , ~GE1 Lfi-S 1'• yid N~ _ ~ s ' = y i 3 . e E ~1 ~ ' i - - - ..__ - - - / 1 " 114e ~ __ _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ 1440 / --__ -_ i - I~ __ _ _ _ _ - _ -~ - - Ian. - -- i - - - i s - _ - -- - - _ _ - - - - uIR a ~,i - - - -- ~ __ -• _ - __. _. ._ _ _.._ ___ 14 a .. _ __ - _ ._ - .__ -_ __ . - _ __-~_ - ~~ - r ~... -__- _ ___ --__ - - 1- - --_ _ - : u -- -- - _- -_. - - -. _. -: a -- --- - --- - - - -_ - - - - -- - - ~ -_ _ s - - - - _ - - - -- --- - - - - - - -- 41e- - ~ .. __ _ _ ~ _ - - __ - _ __ - - - _ _ sT _.. v ~~__ __ ____ -_ ___ ~ ._ ____ r ___ -__ -- - __ __ _ _ _ ._ _. _-. _. _ _-._ __ ..~ .__t _ __- _ __ _ - _ - - __ _ - _ _ _ - - _ - -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _QD -- -_ _ - IDM .- _ ~.. _.. _.. - _ __ __ s - - - - __- _ _ ___ _ J _. ___-. -_ _____ __ __ - __ _ - fa- - _ __ _ _ _- __ -_ -. a _._ _ ._ _.- • __ ____ -- __- __ - _. ._ - 1 Te- _ _ __ _ __ a~vcnvsBRnva ACCEPTANCE OF SF,WER FROM HUNTING HILLS, SECTION 22 r ~ ',~ r ACTION # A-92491-6.c ITEM NUMBER ~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2, FFE Development Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates entitled Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2, dated July 31, 1987, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $15,000 and $60,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2 along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. „ • r SUBMITTED BY: Clifford ig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: -~ CyJ~~'sed Gl Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Harm Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to C. Nickens VOTE No Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ~ .~ ..,-1~-- .. . DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EA~Eh1ENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 7th day of August, 1991, by and between: F F E Development Corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Developer, " party of the first part; the BOARD OF Sl-~ERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," tarty of the second part; and ELMER C. NODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party pf the third part. w' I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to ac;:rue, the Developer does hereby GRANT; CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the -n:enants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water 3n~/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, latarals, connections, storage facilities. sources of water supply, p~_~mps, manholes and any and all other epuipment. and acc:.,rtenances thereunto, in and to the wa±er and/or sewer systems in the streets; avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that. have been or R.3y hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right. to perpetually use ?nd occupy the easements in which the sr^~e may he located, all of which is more oa.~ticularly shown and described and designated as follows, t.o wit: As shown nn the plan entitled Fairway Forest Estates Sectir^ 2 dated ~1uly 31, 1987 made by 3~_~ford T. Lumsden anti associates and nr =i le in the Roanoke Co~_mty Engineering Department. Page 1 of 8 .R The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible far the proper installation and construction of the said water and/ar sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of ane (1) year after dare of acceptance by the Board and will perfarm any necessary repairs at its cost-. Elmer C. Hodge, Caunty Administrator of Raanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the exerut~an of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this canveyance pursuant. to Resolution No, adopted by the Board of Supervisars of Raanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FALLOWING signatures ann seals; Developer: F F E e la met Cor ion , By: R, y l ism RPi As : ~~ ` State o`: ~l ~' ,jam( ~ . County/City of: ~ ~.~) t ~ o wit: _.Tne foregoing deed was acknowled Pd hPfnre me this: i! 1 ~ ~ ! day nf~ -_--_'~Gl~ c,'(, ; ~ -_---~- 19 / / , Cn;ly authorized officer Title ~ f on beha 1 f of °~-. ~~: ~ ~=~ Y._r_.~~C' i1~ ; .1-- ~'~. ~~: ~ Vic. ~ ") _~ - _ Ndtary Public My Commission expires: ~. Page 2 of 3 . , Approved a~ to form: County Attorney State of: County t-~--inistrator of Roanoke County, .~rginia By Elmer Hodge County/City of: ~:~ wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before ne this: day of _ ig by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, nn behal= ~f the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke vounty, Virginia. Notary Public My Commiss;-r, expires: Revised 1C:j6/g0 Page 3 of / ~ ~~ HiCxG~i' ~ - ~h e MIL ~ ~.rt~o~ i~ O n rQ ~ ~~ua~~~4 ,~ ~ ~ `~ ~~~Ev~c MyM^"'^'V~ ~ppy~ 4 S _ _ - OR w ~ fi rSM~ ~ ~ \ 4 ~~ ~oic i4'=BRiDtf F i~ at8 ~ s~ `Sr'i ~~ a~ VICINITY JKAP ~~ etoo; w ~'r `? ~ [17v v I~EY ~9G..,....~.~ ~ ~ wtM• ~3 NORTB Y N y. f ~L y~ I~n~1~J 13 183tl0! AYMtlIV~ \~ tau~~an %/~ ~ ~r ~ / a ~ \ ~ M rr~ 4 ~r~ , r N u N ~ ~-.t.....""1 ~~ ni r....n I i, 1\ ' / rT ! \ I I ~I ~ ~ \ \ ~,. ~ 1 Mr ~ ~~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ \~ ~( ...,,~y~, I ~ ......... J.' 1 rY~ . ~ ~ ....^^ _ .. --~ r.r..w . .N Y ~ • .~N .• ~ ~ . ~ _ \ / ~ L~ N011~36 / / ~ / ~ ~ Y ~` ~~ M / M I ~. r~A ` ~ / , / A / TY1~, ` ~ ~~ • A \~ \ •\ Y~~ Y ~ 1 P) ~ \ P: \ / / Y• ` ~ w L • • ~\ ~ ~ V• 1 ~\ \ ' rq ~ ;++ J / ~; ~ ~~ ` i Nr ^ ~ / ~l ~ .uw% 1 r NYYYYYYY• •YYYYYYYYYY.. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY• • r ,... w ."'r.' '•t~ M y _ . YYYYY •YY Uwrr w~.rt• .~ ru~wr ~• • • ti- BNGINBBRIlVQ ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER SERVING FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES, SECTION 2 ACTION NO. A-92491-6.d ITEM NO. - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water, sewer and drainage easement from David L. & Diane L. Caldwell to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easement(s) to the County of Roanoke for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage purposes in connection with a utility improvement project in the Penn Forest area near Cave Spring High School, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District: a) Donation of a water, sanitary sewer, and drainage easement, varying in width from 12.5 feet to 36.37 feet, from David L. Caldwell and Diane L. Caldwell, (Deed Book 1247, page 1738) (Tax Map No. 87.09-8-5) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated April 25, 1991. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, .; Vic ie L. H fm n Assistant Co my Attorney Action Approved (~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Harry C_ NickPnG Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ACTION NO. A-92491-6.e ITEM NUMBER ..~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program has requested a permit to hold a raffle on December 12, 1991 in Roanoke County. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application of the Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry ~. N;ckens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. s_e~c. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT YES BINGO GAMES Name of Organization MARINE CORPS RESERVE TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM Street Address N&MCRTC, 5301 BARNS AVE, NW Mailing Address N&MCRTC, 5301 BARNS AVE, NW City, State, Zip Code ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24019-3899 Purpose and Type of Organization PROVIDE TOYS TO NEEDY CHILDREN AT CHRISTMAS, NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION. When was the organization founded? 1947 1 Roanoke County meeting place? NA Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES XX NO Is the organization non-profit? YES XX NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # 540831990 Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President:CAPT A M TRINGALI Vice-Presidentl~TS('T R_ w_ F(1STER Address: 5301 BARNS AVE, NW Address: 5301 BARNS AVE NW ROANOKE, VA 24019-3899 ROANOKE VA 24019-3899 Secretary: SGT D. C. FOLEY Treasurer:STEBBINS HUBBARD Address: 5301 BARNS AVE. NW Address: 601 S JEFFERSON STREET ROANOKE, VA 24019-3899 ROANOKE. VA Member authorized to be resoonsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name SERGEANT DEBORAH C. FOLEY Home Address 108 CAMBRIDGE SQUARE, VINTON, VA 24179 Phone 342-5976 Bus. Phone 563-4979 A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing. 911201 Time of Drawing 5:00 PM BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. RAFFLE TICKETS WILL BE TRADED FOR A NEW UNWRAPPED TOY FOR THE TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM. ANYONE WISHING NOT TO PURCHASE A TOY MAY OBTAIN A RAFFLE TICKET FOR $3.00. ALL PROCEEDS WILL BE USED TO PURCHASE TOYS FOR THE MARINE CORPS RESERVE TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM. 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: NA Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Nq Seating capacity for each location: NA - Parking spaces for each location: NA ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. NOT APPLICABLE BINGO INSTANT BINGO lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Garnes or Raffles? YES 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? vF~ 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? YES 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issuQd? YES 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? YES 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? YES 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board. of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of_ the Code of Virginia?YES 9. Does your organization understand that a Ewa percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? YES 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? vF~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who sha?-~ have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? yE5 12. Has your organization attached a check fo.r the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? YES 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? yFg 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? N0, ALL MEMBERS ARE LISTED ON,PG #2 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? NOT APPLICABLE 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? NO If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. TO PROVIDE NFEDY ('HILDREN WTTH TOYS AT ('HRTSTMASTTMF 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? N~ If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code?_ (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? NO (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value COMPLETE BEDROOM SUIT DONATED $2,000.00 BY SINGER FURNITURE CORPORATION Department Charitable N0 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of_ in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing the number of people amount of receipts (These records must be of the dates on which Bingo in attendance on each date, and prizes on each day? retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an o.rganization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo gai,e is in progress, and at such times as are specified in is played, and the 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of_ the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Si ned by: ^4 C~t~~~ 4760 GOLFVIEW, ROANOKE, VV FIRST SERGEANT Name Title Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, *_his 12TH day of SEPTEMBERlg 91 My commission expires: ~- o..~,,, ~... --~'~' AUGUST 31 19 94 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION 'I'O: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box ?.0409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due farm, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Commi sinner o the Re enue The above application is not approved, ' Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION NO. A-92491-6.f ITEM NUMBER .~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgment of acceptance of 0.05 mile of Lange Lane to the Secondary System in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following addition to the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation has been approved, effective September 11, 1991. ADDITION Lange Lane (Route 1955) SUBMITTED BY: 7'Y' Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board 0.05 mi APPROVED ~ BY: ~ LCG ~' ~~.~~j Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x ) Motion by: uarS~ r , ~,1~ ~~e~s No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ACTION NO. A-92491-6.g ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement in connection with Suncrest Heights Subdivision, Section 3, to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easement to the County of Roanoke for drainage purposes in relation to Suncrest Heights Subdivision, Section 3, owned and developed by John A. Hall & Company, Inc.: a) Donation of a drainage easement, varying in width from twenty to twenty-five feet (20'-25'), from Paul W. Sink, Sr., and Willa D. Sink, (Deed Book 692, page 589) (Tax Map No. 98.02-1-51) as shown on a plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd., dated June 25, 1991. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this property. Resp ctfully submitted, is ie L. f an Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Harry C. Nickens Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs X x x x x c:\wp 5 ] \agenda\dona[ion\suncrest. rpt cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ACTION NO. A-92491-6.h ITEM NUMBER .~T®"' a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Oak Grove Elementary PTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: _SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Oak Grove Elementary PTA has requested a permit to hold a raffle on October 12, 1991 in Roanoke County. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application of the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Y~c~~ ~• Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Har r ~_ Nic-kPnG No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File - ;. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seg. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sec. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ~~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization ~~K C,S~I<rV~` ~~=iriE~dl~f~ ~ /~ Street Addr e s s ,,,,, <~-,k /~i/l~i j~ ~~~~ ~"!Y %l""iCf"; ~ 6/V Mailing Address :.~/J/iL. /'=/J j~/J~j~~~--~ City, State, Zip Code ~(~f~/~'f%~'' f° V/~ :J;~~~/~ Purpose and Type of Organization /V`G~/kJ --/,C'Gi~, ,j " ~~J. ~liil~ l~%%~~-~ When was the organization founded? 1 • Roanoke County meeting place? ~~/~~ ~~~'L'rC ~./~//J~/~'~'/f.~`~> `~ (~/f ~~ ~ Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~ /-~~ ~(,~ /~j ~~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: ~~' ..Y.--~ ..~, President: `//%}~ C-~.~ Vice-President .,_//~y'/~`/- ,~,~•'~',~~~°ef/~`, Address : ~~ 9~ ~;t~'k~:,/~'.~41nr ~~1. • Address : ~i ~.~"o~ ~/~~i~ ~ /~ ~' ~- ~ tc J /•~ fr~.C Secretary:.[/~"~,,' .c: ~N~~-,~.~~-L~ Treasurer: ~an/ ~- ~A,~,,J~, PyG/L. Address: ~Q~/ ~.2a~,~,r,r=~.~ .,D Address: ~.30~.5~ ~d~-1~G /. ~~ Member authorized to be resaonsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: '~ Name ~~.~"'~~ ~ ~~ ~. ~. Home Add r e s s ~ ~~~ ~, f 1~~~ ~'~.~e~ ~t ` ~` > ~: Lt f /~"f~.~.L. ~ ~`~-lir~~' ~~ ~~~e~/.~~. Phone~~~;~- ~ /r,~..~~ Bus . Phone ,°L /~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. C"~~~ CR/CGdI- 1- l L /~~L/y'//J.~~ ~ f'/`/LJI C- RAFFLES: Date of Drawing /~1 ~ /~- C// Time of Drawing /+•'.j~~/~ BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 s State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. //r~zlixtc0 'Y ac+ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? )/~'~ 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue?~ ~ S 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~~l F 5 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? 1/ ~' S --- 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter?~_ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? =',;~_ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?_~,~, 9. Does your organization understand that a Ewa percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~ 5 ~' 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~t_'_ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who sha'_~l have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? ~,~~. --~- 12. Has your organization attached a check fo.r the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia?_-v~/~~ 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~',- 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form?--1~. 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form?_ ~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Solicitations Act, Section 57-4R of the Virginia Code?_ (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value ~~~ U ~oveZ ~Q®. ~ Department Charitable 6 ,~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does .your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo gai,e is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand. that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of_ Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Cade of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~~ .~~v ~-14,ZL~C~txet,.cJ //~~ ame Title Subscribed and sworn before me, this My commission expires: 19 ~ ~~~L.si,C~v9~/ l~~li/ /.~. Home Address day of 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.0. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 6- NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of thisr~calendar year. 1 _ ~// Date C mmis Toner o e Revenue. The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 . ~, ACTION NO. A-92491-6.i ITEM NO. .,~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24,1991 AGENDA ITEM: Settlement of contract dispute with GTE/Vision Tech regarding CAD software package COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• Negotiations with GTE's legal staff has resulted in a settlement offer of $50,573.75 which represents one-half of the amount originally paid by Roanoke County to Vision Technology, Inc. for multiple software packages in 1988. A disagreement developed in January, 1991 between the County and GTE over the performance of the integrated police and fire computer aided dispatch (CAD) software system for which the County had contracted in September, 1988 with Vision Technology (GTE's predecessor in interest). Based upon comparisons of other CAD systems operated by other localities of this size, county staff was of the opinion that at this time the potential existed for obtaining a system which is more appropriate for this County's requirements. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several face-to-face negotiating sessions between GTE's legal counsel and the county's staff has produced an agreement in principle for the settlement of this dispute. The essential terms of such settlement are as follows: 1. Payment by GTE to Roanoke County of $50,573.75 within 30 days of the execution of a settlement agreement. 2. Return of all software and proprietary information to GTE by November 1, 1991, to allow for transfer of records data currently usable. 3. The county to provide to GTE information developed by the county during "Beta" testing as to defects in software. 4. A agreement as to appropriate public comments regarding the terms of this settlement. 1 . s ~~~ FISCAL IMPACTS' The county would receive a payment of $50,573.75 within 30 days of the settlement of this dispute which could be utilized to pay for the new PSSI consolidated dispatch software program. ALTERNATIVES' 1. Accept the settlement upon the terms agreed to with GTE. 2. Reject the settlement and proceed to litigation with GTE which could reasonably be expected to take several years and with only a 50-50 chance of success. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend acceptance of the settlement terms as set forward above. Respectfully submitted, J sep B. Obenshain Senior Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x) Motion by Harr C'_ Nic~kPn~ Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers c:\W p51\agenda\lit\gte Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ~ ~- I COUNTY OF ROANORE~ VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE ~ of Genera 1 ~ 1 ~ Amount Fund Expenditures Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1991 $4,269,399 6.10$ and Balance as of September 24, 1991 Submitted by ~~~ Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25$ of General Fund expenditures ($70,036,927). " / -~ August 15, 1991 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 Sale of Shamrock Park (Board approved sale on March 26, 1991, Sale Finalized August 1, 1991) $ 6,097 34,914 Balance as of September 24, 1991 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance a 41,U11 `"' COUNTY OF ROANORE~ VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 50,000 July 9, 1991 Additional funds for Alleghany Health District (8,000) July 9, 1991 Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (3,000) Balance as of September 24, 1991 $ 39,000 Submitted by YV C,lav~ ~ • ~~~' Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~~ ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - August 1991 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,219,605.81 Payroll: 8/2/91 $ 454,091.29 8/16/91 443,539.22 8/30/91 516,050.37 1,413.680.88 $4,633,286.69 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers V ~ Y N n+ n o h o a °_N I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I i o ~ I I O O { ~ ! WWI c~ 1- ¢a o. o t i (` I N k d c• I dt >• ~ I ... .c. ',rnro` L 7 ~w t+ I > U I ^Q. I d V Y C I O ro i C rove 'O d ~ N ro W E O •w i ~ IT N ~ W C !7 w O-0 1- C i d II E f d ++ ~ ro I ~ I i f'1 0 i = i A ~r L O a d i _,/~' n ri ~. 1.1 a n bh N O NI N_N h_N: ~ ~i m ~ d I I 7 1 C V-) 1 d O +~ I > d I d\~U I ~ ;b I ro .7 I q {D I H N ~ I r ro I v~ I d'd I N jU I •~ iC I .-t ; ro I roil a ro I L m 1 G~ t ~ I I I 1 N 1 d 17 I o !c I h d Y J 1 d 1 ~ 1 I I N 1 T d r+ . 7 1 t ~! C V ld C > 1 o':d I S ~ I r I Id 1 `D• i (V i7 m I ;1 1 i I i ~r~l N C h J J' •- rV l 7 YI ~ h Q ] ~' N rf Y! ~ r~ m i n i I ' r v v a a a a I ! i I I . : I v v l a .~ n mat rt I I I W R O N :7 yy n W h W P P N a n l* n n~ t0 'D b g b i V V ~N h-.-C h h_ ~~1 ~~~~ i ~ ~ I i I FFOOYCFO^MOD C.o V'o111FUlMaDFOMOj~IOODOM'~7'~l'MOO i FCUOON!DFODNaOFOCFF~Lt1Fl11 YD IlOOOrDOO+{U O+N 111 tp OiO .,. N.- o FF 'MN e61 a0 F'+-a0 FoP m': U1 0 lltl`•~oPCO I ", .- I +- M N M M~ ~- ~ M M i I ~ { i I i I OO~oOd• v' V'Q~o+NMOU1 ^~F'1 oD0 I oD ^'lilo moOOMOM~Ir•F~O in ~D ~!: YDi mlAo.-W WMU1F•-.oaU1oNM~FF• WNm W ~OOt,-vooW ~Y.O a'~,.. a') llto+oNFlllUlo~~-lfiMOM~O;'lll~t Rmo; oa01~-o~+•-m V D~~OUIV ~i ~t .I . oMONT00 a!'Or :POFOIJIFV'111mo6 .-1111 N Mo.ocPF71I1 NCO UII- N; I11N1J1 o+apoNlll OOM WvP-o,d" •- •-; F o.-.-M•-.FFF o oD ', a0 MF:V N •-~RMMNN`-F, 7'~ •- tIYN^MNO+OD~O i"~ o; o~ '^~^ ~' N~ " ~ I N I .001 a0l M ~ i. '~. ^ '; i ~ I ~ { M O• .- Ul 111 Ul lfl O F ~0 i ~' 0 r0 N •- •- 00 0] Ul P 0+ 0+ N !.- P W OD 'O .O lfl ~. 111 ' O7 0.-^w V'NOO O+; 'V' O+FU' 111FF ^NMODF V'MiIY O+O+vf 7 P~ st ' ulo, FN V'V oM•t~o~: v~MoOO'NF0+0+~. ~tO1l1 ~-.poMoUlUYI W': oD i N.O ii N •-111oO+O+F~'. G~N~JIMtl'Mro T,,. o F NU1OFl11 111 N! Q+ 0+ mFi M ~tMNL1MN, MV"~. MM M 7 Nom; NrM I 0+i 0' I : ' ~~ ; I ~ ~ i 1 I mCI 7F~10O~-aDM'0; U1O:~tno V'Mln~Ulm m t11N~ P~O'Z' ~ mI .n,~ ~OFi trw.-~O V w~00+' O+~ONFrnNN o.-P M rO~awO+M i N! N. ~0op! v .v^mFF.n'~: ~-.--~•O+MFMF! ~o M ~oPO~o.- i 111i NI .- .o j .D ~ V' 0 V' In F j o sf ~tal 'C .a N O+ ~ F 0+ F ~N ~0 F stn ~ ~ F i F .- 111 ~ ~0 V' 00 ^ •- CJ '~: M 4 ': N N C' F F F eY I M ~ M M ^N 0~ 01 ~ ^I ' a'o~oOOOOOOOOOOO~oOOOOO o ooM~lp<>oo•t ~ N~ N `) i Foooooo0000000000000-, 0 '70O4oooM ;~O R;: ~f .- o io 0 0 0 0 0111 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F t'1 0 0! Ui NI o 111 F o 0 o N 1~ M. M M o o U1 0 ~o 0 0 C0 o U1 ~o lfi o ~o or M IJ1 V1 Ili i N ^ o a0 ~1i1 00 'd' ° '~QO 111 ! 111 7 o..tnN0+111 .0O7F.-V'r-llt U1 LI1 .- N'. O U1~-M111Mb•NT ':O 0; OD I N m 7 M 7 F? ~» M M N N 00 '.. ~ i N to N^ M M N o P M o; o ' NM~•- 7 •-N R ! 1 t MIN (^ F F I M I~ ~ ^ j ~ p , I !N d j 'i ! ~ ~' ~ ro a '' I m o ~ ~ ~ iI `~ ro v L ' ''l00. a ~ ~ ~ ' d' o i Ud I °~ '•.. C Ni d3~. N I ~ C~' G- I 'NM ~ ' I Ifi : •+ O d! IL d I I O[ 4- ( '.,da ro i i d ro x'. .8- x N~. Ui ~ SI ~ I x -; L t+ ro~ x d ro v! d i I N ~ N d i '. > U •O i - ~. ro 1 0 N F ~, ro x: U~ C '. F O '. d d 4- - N E 7 1. ! L •~+ •r+ , ~ I F- 'i a d F ro C O x O i. NIL ! N ~: L O d ro C! •D N 6 a I '' i L L 4- ': F- '. d •a ro ELL ' d d 7 ', U L d; I I N T: O d O' T ~ V +~ k O i, d U d: N r d •„ O>! Q O ^' I ,. i d ~+ ~V v a+ d~ •a ro O L .. LL C! LL~ d •~ Ut ~> O d i '.••t d ro i I, x L ! C 7 ' x ..a N~. J >7 d ~ d i ' Ot y 7 ~ L L ~ '. UI .-~ UI ro ++ U ', Q '. i ro d l d .~ d' ro .•+ C !. L Ifs L' •-, V ~ v ~~. L w '. d 0. ' r ro d «+ ro ~+ I Z i I F a'U •~+1-•~+ d'x d 0::C •+ ro'~ O~i L'.ro L Etn N;U1 U N'UV LI 7 O .... W J '. v U ro~ U d d n.'. L •~+ 7' L O O i V 7 O ••+ C ~'. O O I LL ~ i d L!> ' Ul 7 •.+ F- U d' U 4+ d N v 7 O -,U LL L I, L d 0 ,U L d N d U i ~. rajL N C~d J •~+~•~ O L'd C WI V:, Y-.O L d O 0.~. +~ N JI i ro :ddH.-~N dt JSO.~xo .TTJ V-roC~.VO~xWro~!N 4; J ' j V r•+!N •.~ :ro L N'N d C ~ro V U I 0.!D. C N! .L N';d d W! V roL FI d , U1 ro~: y+.cn d N•ti>OAW I.F- C:N O'~O ro d~NN~'•t'.Lr ~.dNVd O` F i I i W CIU ••+ C. E dt r r+ N.v 'U 7'd I .wld ro V'L Iw F-; O I I O .~+ ~•+ d '•+ 7 C: U L N ••+ ~-+ N L ro •~+ x 0 N C Qt ~ d ~'. > V d ro L L N 1- : .•+ N ', r-+ ro E ro N ••+ C O d '+ d d d E ~7 E N L i +r d d L E U O I L a- d d C ro L~ C T U C N ro r x •.+ ~ x't •.. C 'L a d', O C> N •~+ N. V C ro ~•+ L L' ro O ' d d' 7 d ro 0 0 7 L O ro ~+ O N ++ C ro' d d .+ L •r+ d L d ~~+ d O L d v r L Z ~d~dn.a.JV 0]LL.Yi-O=F-.OQJ[LLL. V dLL~ V~>:~ZUI3OO,i- Q ^~, ~ I Z ~. o .- 'N M V o^ N M V U1 ~0 F 0 P o .- N ~f F 00 T o N o r- w o .- v M w M t9 ], '~~. ^.-'~,~^^NCUNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM V' V Ul UI U1 rO~~0FOD O~ ~ , LL, j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : -- (. o~l o~ om ool W W f O~II as I i # # f j i N ~ O I , •'~ g r i ro ..r I 4 a o ~ ~ a^ a o+ I ¢ \ ~ M r !roc ~ .M NOD ~ 'c 'o ~ ~rnmw ' L d i- F.+ U d '7 C ^ N kf ~ L 4. ~d ~ O Y E O 7 N !C U d # i0 W I 0. N F- I O L O 6 ~5~7~ ~+ ~+ { 'C ••+J IS 17~d ~V NUT i o. M x 4. P W 10.O r ; a f 7 L N U i. i 41 I +; t j k F I r IN 5 ~q M L a O a N Q' i f N.M ,~.d;~~ _ i n 1 :i'.'m ; n nan a_n a_v I ~ ~~ i I .~^~ '~ 1 f ' ~ ~ - N o W j I .- N W' I In N NM •t I N aO to lnl iN Ut UI ' ' o o N N w. 1 b C J]!p I ! . ~ O~. ~ W M,, !N V O+I~ !M tf1 ~0 ;1~ 1~ I N ; •UI o M~•- N O~ ! o O V~ ~- d Ei M d7\ d I 6+M o; INNRj 'O+OD Nj`~'O <A ~DNN'V'b ~O ~Oj ^ w c'~~, ro v l ~ ~ GI N m I ! F ~b m I I ~ ! ! I i i ~ ! T- I ' I I a i 1 i ~ I d 1 ~ '. ! I I b~ a ~': ? o .-, l11 , ^ a0 .-~. ^ ~ 'V' oD f`-'~. 111 P ' ! ~~ ' ^ I '. ! ~F o ln'N ~ Ulj M ' 1 !M M e1', ' ~O I ' L W 1 o~ O m 00 UI':, N N N o'. ~ o .N N o;o ^ ' ' .OD ln;r- o N7 N V'; O ~ O+ ~ ~ ~f' ~N N M. ' M ~ ^ N W ! ' I W U I I OI O M v a0'. m W N F ,, M C ,V 111 O+la6 •- !O I O m OD f I ~ ' !~ C I i E N I ! i . to ( to .~.. •- •- ~ ' N ~'R M Iil j <Y ~N N Rt l ^ O+ j.o aO N OD ~O M U1 ^ ~ ma+O00mIAi o Ill ~ V UI OD I ~•-N7 N 7 ~7.., 1 I ^I .- ~bUl' U1 Mm M 7a0.-,~UIM ' M , V' ml C' N ~ ! M ~O F U N 1 ', V' lA N 00 ~,M ~• ODIN ^ :h . , ^) N j . ~~ I ! N ` 1 '' i v' N ~ .- .- oD~' .- Ur o N M w to o' O• M ^ ~, M V M ' U1 ' ' M _, 0 ' o M ' L ~ 1 a .- V' ! Ill o OD 0+'~.. ~f' M tl+ N m M , M N 7 M o !~- 00 ; ao P 0 V o , ~ N !M o V' 7. E I '~._ N OD O+'i N ,o+ o N ' M ':u r- out 0 .- . ! Oj V U1 0 M f •.r ', U ^ I ', O• m N ! N ...lJt N '~., c4 .~. 00 O 0 00 ' N O ~ .o .n N V' N N'. • o o+ ! 7 U1' ; - N i o~ o~ ~ C f- I ', N a+ ^ h- I m .o ~, IA ~ •Y o~ W .IAN o .- N M •- N i a . i ~, o. w 1 ,.. .- ~ ~ ' ~ N I I i ~ x -. ~ I , ~, ~ I ~ w I ~ ', ; , '. ~ ' iU m ~ !C U I ' I o N N'', W -- o ~i .- N N N~o 111 'h W o+v F~ o ' ! P U1 ! 1 { .. C I !. M +a .O' to o sf V' o N N 111 N 1`- I St W h NI V• N h ~t m . ll1 - i ,~ N I ~ M III ^ o .O ^ ~ N '.w N aDI M ~ ~ ~ i ~ ' C L I ', I m d I I ! ' M o .- bl V' R M to O~I :? ~ ~ •- h-: V• N~ 111 ' sI ! I N 7 1 ^ ~. ' ~ I I I M U 1! i 7 C I ~ ~ i j ~ ' -0 W I ~ i I I, C '~ I ! ! UI W I i hl .o ' O+ OD M.. ' M ^ ~ ~o+ U1 .a.m U1 N M c Lf1 oD h o I IA{o W ll1~N 00 0l N 00 Ulf ~0;.- a V' ^ M ! ,gyp F v IA M =N L I j ~I A 7 I ~ N lfl h: W o ~' N :o .a . ^ IN ^ ^ W o V' V'N m :N . N,^ N N,•- o OD IA iM M ^ jO~ I j I ; t •~, I' Nlll o, M ~~. '.QO 7 .-oMM W ~ ~:N ' NCI f~•Y Ulm06 W~i ' 111 !fo W ~ o I OD - I ; i r 'D I i .- .o .- O+ ' Ul V' ~ O+ M N b M ^ ' ~. a0 .~ O+ .- N I N .- ! ^ o 1.• I N f . .- ' , C C I '' to ' In .tn M N ~ ~ ^ N. ~O ' ! j ~ ~ W I ~ ~ f I I I I ~ 1I I ' N N N ^ u... V• ~.M o o~; M M IA OD~M M ~~.N N~'.^ 111 P'ln o F! ' ~' I M.O j '.I~ ' ~. I i , o o O. O+ 0+ W ~OD ~D O' •f .- N N,o lA :N M~.7 y' VI ll1 o N I11 N ^ ~. t11 •p :. r I o' o ' I W V' h ~ •- ~..,, P- OD o .o .- M o+! 7 ~t . M ~ ml V 7 0 ~, N P- ~o: V' j R N ~ N 7 ; ! pl 1 I ~ ,:. (A I O .- N' Ul ~.. o l!1 .O N ~ ~] N N N M • m' 00 lil W ' oD M a" I ' Q+ M M .O + ' N O ~ Ul M N h ~; N V' I lL ! i •O I ! ' •- o .o N : ' t -, M W ' M 111 ', 'o M ~ m O+ 00 00 0 0 ~J M aO N M +- d F I. : ~ 0 V N o /+<<o N .o~ ^ ~o ~ M v+ ; l T ~ : N i I 7 I I m l! c . N W 111 : ~ . lil N N: o ' ~ I N^ I Ill i 1 I L 1 ~ ~ . ~ j C ~ a, ! 3F r E ~. M N , E', V ~' C' j l N j L~ W m L V d C I W ' p U EI O', 7 I ' C9 i ~ '. V •.~ V O i i 1 I .•. N~. C I U - L L, (9. ' H ~, ~ d ; ~.,, W O ~' N. ; C] V c w C N ' ' • ~ j w d 0.j L >- j ~. N O. U >. L~, N , • o ., ~ ...w co o 'w a.. N •.. v, I o ~a j j ~ ! F--~: N ~ U 1 ~ r '~ .. M •~ tiT E' N' ' 3 N ` ' V j l '~' ~ ~ d C '9 .a M N I M d 7 L .. •.~ N . ~ C ~ i ' ^' I ro L' m d m' ~ •~ C o m .• O ' u d: ro 7 x u i N N m d ++ u •~+ ~ ~ L C L . N i ~+ W Z Z ~ C m •~+ O L N Ul t d ~ W d ~ E 7 ~b. C L '~ , O r O .-. > ' '+ . ~ / M W t N , ca ' a ti m c r c: v a u o .~ a t a a p. a L v a ••• -+ ! .•, .., * -> y .+ M 7 '~ V N C ~-+ C '. 7 !~ UI U C E Or' 7 N m C j N ; i s N'. dF '. ~...b ..~ U1 N •.. •'1 j L N O ~+ O 0. -~ •.+ ••a C •.• O N, a j d d W I N ,,. i N' jr ro ' W 3; OO:++. U V : ~ CJ ^ N L V ;~ !22 M I6 ' i d. o ~ N ~-, L 0 3 0 , ~• v 7 ' o N C' d .-~~ ' O C I ~' 1 '. o '.. ro 0 0 N C E o C W U. L -+ , o ++' M W N W N m, o .+ U •~ U ' - Z o N L r ^ ' v O •.. N I W a, .. m ', M N N N ++ C U L', V• ~ N '~+ L , ++ . ' O. o .. W V o ~ L E r o i N L UI E o ... Oi 7 c •.+ ro W. o M .r N .+ '. U C ' ' 7 E 3~ L C •~+ Ui L 4- •~ O~ L C: i C p Q~ ao-' ~ N d ~ O O~ m~ O O C N N N m C m W' , d 7 7; 7 it J V' W V V>. JLL. UUd d4)OL'S WC9 NI ,L O_Ul7d I C]' ~, ~~ 0 0 0 0 o o Ul 0 0 0 0 lil o- 111 0 lA o Ul 0 ~ 0111 O, Ul ~~ Z' : ' o ^NM ^NN ^NM7 V' ^^NNMM V ~ iNNMM ' j O : , o. .- .- ^ N N N M M M M M R' ~ V ~ V' V' R . U1 U1 U1 lit LL ~, ~ r , ~_._ o ~. i O o 0 : O o 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 O. O O O. ~ I m o L i c' v o- C, ~ L o~ ', O O O~ O I , I ! ~ . ., r ~ ~ CQ ~'~ ..n~~ oono a~-- .S { i ~ \ ; o\I o~,' o o WW1 C7 ~ ! Q Q a^, E i :J !~ I C3 ~~ a v i •a ~r d v a` •~ _. i ~, n~nT~ n ooT-V n o ~a F rvT~ •i ~, - - - I i I 4 I ,, ~ I I 1 ' i ~ ! ( O ` I ep O I ; ipOO OOO ~' bO , f •p C .~ y.. i ~ O 1 o O O O i i I ~ WIT W U1N O I^ O O+ M I 111 V ~D I -M; N T O q' Q~ M O O O O b 0 0 O O p, 7 '„~\~ a I (.. 0 1n In ~ ~ +a .n .a to N v W M [~ ~ i W I I ` i x U i U I l O i...N , .-;~~a0ao N ('1N I I I I W C ro V i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I i I i W 7 1 I ' i F-W Iro I 1 ! ! ~ I I I ~ I ~ ' I r ! I I '~ I ! ! i ! N I U I !a 1 'L a I ~ I iT V' SOW M r- I i ot"1~oO 111woNO ,~~ 1111 M! ; I ~NtbON~O Mo~(11o MO j W ~ I i 1 MO'OOO~olf1, o~oo~•or•oNl ~O a0 i0o NN i M ~ C O I '~a U 1 ! I vv o ~7NNo of O+mNM.oao 1111 oop~oo,'7or•+ ~ o~~o }A r E ro l I mN ti' W ~MIf1M ' N~---W?~"1 0! NMO~tolflolA m NM I ro '-7 r+ I o+ W M O+ ~ O+ .- ul I F N ~- 1~ .o , tni o .- o .0 o WWI ~ P fil i I f.. .a ~:U ro 1 i !N ~ .-o MI N~ N i N'~ N'"~N^' M :. ~ ', i M ~ N i i W O I = I I' ~ : I • ~ i I+ f ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ; I ~ I ! a~ ! do+ N; a. I ; ', ' vt~o r- , ooMMb P-! aM•ta~h-o M! ' ~ 111 ; 1111 " N N I i I i. Q\ I L D I '~ 'R N o o m V' ~O M o N; sr er t;, o n o w ~, i 1 ' r' ~ I ~ i I 7.E l i 0111111 0+ NNW W W I NI to M No tnd W M i a I i I 1 'ro CA j •••~'U^ 1 j ~!MN l11 . .o'~.-t-oN Mj mwmvttlM W! 0.1 j W W~ W W o ~ ! :., ro W ; L: C I- I ~•- UI N M m o .•. M .- .o : N N N I v, ,.. ~ff 1 I j I I I OI N W ~ i d W i t i i ' I i ~ ! ~ I ~ L a 1-- ~~ ! : ~ . : I . ~ :.. U 4 W! 1 1 i ~~ i I ~' I l I p > C^ ,rna '.C U 1! .D Ul N 'a O+ N ', N o W W ~! ! 1 N i I ' N i ' i I : '~ L lL •.+ C I M ~ m 1~- N v l M 1•- o j o' ^ ~ i a a 0 t fD ro l l i (!i ~- N tt . `•- O+ i •- i i 1 i ~ II O7W1 I ~ro~1~ I c'W NI, ' ~ a•i ~ Ni N ! ~ ~~Q r E 1 I N , 1 !roC ' N71 ~ ' ' { ~ i , ' i 'p W I ~: ' r U I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ i ; I ~ I ' a .. Sj ~ O W I I I I I Y- N i- ! '. I ~ I i i i , ~ i 'O a Z l L O ! Ni a l V' o N ~W N M' W V' ; W m if1 o N :o O+ I .- I 'Z' V o I.. ~ ~ hi > ~E L 1 I sf to 1`~ 111 r-~Mi P'. W MMN~DO V' N j M i ~ ll , ~ '.~.~. ~T7 I f o.ln .- WNIltM' 7- VN~W 111:m o1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~7 V Q Y I i ~ :W m .-. ~N .- .- ~ N '~ N M .- N UI M 0~ ~' V' ~ 111 ~ ~ VI'"' ` i ~ ~O C U ''.r b I I .- M W N N E U1 M N ! N. i ~ I U a U1 ! I ' C C I ', M ~, Ni, I. ! i I i a., I ~ '~o a I I~ I ! I x iL ; E a l i W ! ~ x I; I N a_ o p ( , W 1 ~' ~ ' .,~ 7 ~ ~ '7 lf1 M o , M! •a M o o, ' + o to 0 o I. o I p ~ .O o ~0 ~ i i0~ ! I y ~ ! ~ I I t i ~' I ~ d• '..c~ W o [T O+ N O+ V' o ~n 111 0 vf~ooUY ~n i 1`•i W M Itl p o i ~MOMN; W I M! ~ N w :,o s1' O i o Moomo! O N O N N i0+~0 ,ul ! , I 7 7 1 j ~ O 1 W ~N m u~ 7 N ~- ~n o N ' c !, ~ N a0 ~ N o ': 111 N et• o N m G+ o M ;o et o o N •-:o ~O o{ W~ 07 N M I^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) p. I f V I i 7 I I .- In o ~ M.- W N O+ 7 ~ a MN~ W.j I M•-M.- t 0+~ N~--MN~-~ o M O+ N I i a U ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ . , N i ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ( ~ i I f'1 M L m w I I ~ Vi ! i I i G y ~ I ' I ro .~ ~ ~ , i a. i s i I i i I ~ N i E C i ' V E r ~ ~ ~ o x rn wi L I a. ' u c ' I I I I ..~ 1 L I , i ~ E i, N O ' 1 ` ro j a O % a O; ~~ L'. r a, ~c O~ ~, C N L ,y j Iro ~ ro i ,+, r ! ~ : I ~, .N. ' N i'I, ' ro•. j > rj ro ! iro C'L C~ ai >. ~ 2 r I I E .•, I r C > > 00 ~ i I {r I I I ! ~ C ro 0. .•. ! L , i r L' i a ~~. . O ;r O ~. V' +C •~ • ; y ', ^. I'b E C V I O O C a a E iN N i 7 !O ~ ~ ~ U '! a Ui aw C ' LI U • I N'a 3 r'UI ~TU v a U Nj r iL L I I o ~ ! i L a 3 C to C O! .~+ a ' a' D• C'E a ro~a T; N :-+ C~a C r, L ;a a I fN { I ^ I L,. O ro' W ••, .. E O.E ~! C a;a•~ r,U r; r L r •••'x ro Ci I ro '~ 4- !L j ~ U N r~ V V L •.•~ r~ > L '~. L ••+ : a L> W .-i 7 li ••~ d N N ~ i s ~ i i ! ~-• a L ro' d -V ^~ ~' C x a O'7 ao 'a C~ ~ 0. IV O ~0 OI aa-+ar am u; a ^ C C ' iroro jN i 1 j ' I i , ., ..u r a, m•.+ a , ' ~ ow '> Ui N E W L•~~+ U' C 7 1 aL L IC I ro; •• ••+ L O CL Y ~ ~ N i I . + ~^ T Q • C F h- f N 1 I I '~~ C' C> N U: V O' C Li. a a r C ~. a E ; a O I\ ~ U ! O I L O~a L a a. +~ W rol, w>^ C rolar OI m a.0. Q a ro i f I I ..+.> a x ~, r r' a' ..,; a L: ~, c!a Lla c >.~ z tov ,r ; I I I rroUY ~ G7-+ I p~r'UEF-IU ! arol•~.,V.NaL~. !CC i N I' I 7.S o w~rro.n'N o! C ro:•., d i•.. of ar•h ro :L U~Oi o !7 7 Y Y I° j i n I i, r: .-~ o ': L r •~+ L o; .. L E O U L ~ o! T .~ ! a C a 7 C r, o - . - ~ ' ~ ' ~ -t ro In N l ro Ui L :7 N. -0 r+ ~~ O C a W I O a f O N L ~+ C I •~ 7 E r a' V O+ O I L ro a L ; O ' o ~ r :, F...~ N'7 U O Y: L ••+ r r L~ UI C .. O! C d C a .•-~ r ro O O> d~N O; .•-~ ;. • d N'.x ~0. C >ii , !r r ~ ~ i C] ^ 4 C O O ro •~ UI O 7 S O U a 7 •~+ ~ E ~~ ' ro a a s O C: ~~ C C j I I ~ .r ?-U) C.Jd V U d V WOa2 W f,N~Q: Q:U-+~. ~"n" I r L ^i. oU1o ooooo ~, ulolnoo~o ' olnolllolnotn~'~ ' ~N I ! ~p I Z; '~ 'V' 7 lft ~- M R 111 ~O ~ N N M V',lft 7 Ill Ul. ~ N M M V •O ~O ~ a i ' . o, ui ut ut r~ r- r- r- 1~ W W W W W W c~ m m m m c c~ c+ O' m c oo j i , y I ILI ' o,oo 00000 000000 oOOOOOO I ~ ! , ~ ,. .. ,~ ~ • y __ ~ ! k. _. ( ", ~,/~__ ~ .._ s.+t u j 1rr V a c ` .~ n eNi~ n n '~~~ - N n d !, m a > - I o - N ~ d*u~n n~n o a o~ rv d•n '~T '-• <: S.~ ~' ,, ~ n n $;n a m dim o a~o r`. ~. 1! m r ~ N !1 d n O h O a ~ .. .. ~ .- ._ .~ - Ni N N N N; N f ~...f ~i M ! F, d d d ~~ __. ~ ._ _~ - __ _- _ __...I _. _ _ ... - --~ - ~ - ( ~ t i I . j ~' ~ ~ i ~ ~,; ~ ~ I \' , , i M~ I i i i, ~ o .- , ~i I '.. ~ ~ . o o h ~ ~ t ~ ~, ~ ', ', ~ ~ ~ j (~ F- ~ ~ j I ~ ~ '. ~' '' I 1~ d O I i j I ~ ~ I,.. ~I ~ j I,i I I { i ' i i 1 i i i ~ I I C .O '~. O 1 I ! ~ , W E r I N i j a~~ a I ~ , ~ ; ~ j w c' ~o v I i I i ~ ! I i I j w; ~ I j ; s ~ I t Cl •. N QY I I '~ ,I ~ i j II '- o o I, i IA I ~ ' a' I ~ i '~ '~ I '.. i j C I ~L N 1~ 'Lf1 III I. i I f ' - I I p i ~.W U 1 ~ ~. ! I i ~ i j j ' ~ ~.. E r6 I 'tn to ! ' •.~ j ~ i V N I ~ ~ i I I L j G G1 I i ~ t ~~ I ' p, 'i d I ~, UI 1f1 ' ~ '. I ' r d ~i a o+ 7 ~ E I .- I . ~' d ~ I 1 ~rn m w j a w 1 to to I ' x I ~ ' i •~ U Q! i W' I~ i j, i ip C U I •- •- ~ ' i I~p C I .N 7 I ~ IM M~ '. I ' !. r U 1 ~ -' I ~ ~i IOW 1 I _ I ' O W I I ~ !, ~, ~ i I t 1 4- N F- ~ ~ :. ~ ~ i ~ I O W Z i N ' ~. i j ~ J L O. ~ d l I ~~ M M I ! i r 7 E i •~ L I ~ o o ~ j { .r V I } '~ 7 I 1 I11 111 : i ~ I .G ... J! r I ~ ' i O C V~ ' r b 1 '~ M ~ M ', I V 0i US ~, ' C C 1 N N I ~ , '~ - i ~I ! 1 a..~ I ;o w 1 t _ ~ ' t w N j w ~. ', i. i I t i I I I R V I I ~~' r l M M' ~ ~ i , I I 4~ ~ ~ I i a 1 _ i ~ I I : ~ ~. i W ~ 1 9 ~' i u I ~~ ~ i o o '' ~ 'I I i ! II to ! L I I ~ ~` ~` ~ ' ~' I •~' i j ~ j j `~j ' ~ j I i { ~j o ~ i j I j I ~ ! i i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' j ~. i ~ I j % ~ ~~ I i t i 1 j + a~ ~ I I i i ' i o ~ I z ~ ~ j I ~ a ~ ~ ~ j o ~;. j ~ ~ j i I i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z, ; 'L O, ~. ! O I 2' ~~ C'J ~, ~ I ', v. I ~ I ~ ! p: 11 w ., f ~. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER /'/ " ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Policy regarding RADAR transportation into the County and Funding COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the September 10, 1991, meeting of the Board of Supervisors Susan Williams from the League of Older Americans office spoke concerning a public hearing to be held for comment on special needs transportation. She indicated that RADAR, the special needs transportation for Roanoke City, refuses to come into the County. At the request of the Board of Supervisors I have investigated this matter and offer the following analysis. The Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc., provides the specialized transportation service for agencies and municipalities in the Roanoke Valley area. For services in the City of Roanoke and areas serviced by Valley Metro, the service is called VM-STAR (Valley Metro - Specialized Transit-Arranged Ride), formerly called RADAR. In the County of Roanoke (including the Town of Vinton) the service is known as CORTRAN. The services which are provided by Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc., are spelled out in the contract with the respective municipality and include associated cost. In the case of CORTRAN, qualified County residents may schedule a ride 24 hours in advance, which may include destination inside the City of Roanoke. The County has budgeted $68,000 during the current fiscal year to cover this service. VM-STAR provides service to qualified city residents. Additionally, persons living within one quarter of a mile of an existing Valley Metro route (which could include areas of Roanoke County and the City of Salem) may also qualify for this service. The one quarter of a mile extension is based on federal regulations for public transportation systems receiving federal monies. °- The County of Roanoke does not provide a public mass transit system and operates CORTRAN as a specialized service. Roanoke City, on the other hand, operates Valley Metro and receives supplemental funding from the federal government to provide specialized transportation. Because of the federal funding, the specialized transportation routes must parallel regular Valley Metro routes. To date, there has been no decision to provide transportation for City residents outside of the City boundaries above and beyond the routes normally operated through Valley Metro. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that the needs of the County's residents are being adequately serviced at the present time. We will continue to monitor the progress of the Americans With Disabilities Act and its implication of expanding the service area of VM-STAR, which may be beneficial to the Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services and other County services located near current Valley Metro routes. Respectfully submitted, John M. Chambl' s, Jr. Assistant Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs 2 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST FOR ARING ORDINANCE ~ C ZENS COMMENTS PUBLIC HE ~, SUBJECT: .~/1 U /` ,!a J;~ ~ t/i -f;` ~-; - L~/ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIIE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must 6e directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 ,~ ~ ~, `: ~ '~, f '3 / j 1 L~ ' ~_ / ~;'!'L ` ~ (iii-/ ~ 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 September 24, 1991 EXECUTIVE SESSION County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss the disposition of publicly-held real estate, the old Bent Mountain Fire Station, in accordance with Section 2.1- 344.A.3. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION 92491-7 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk CC: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Executive Session ~" ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZ- ING THE SALE OF 0.443 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS THE OLD BENT MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on -i ~~'{ I ~1 ~ and a second reading was held on ( Q ~ b~~ ~ ~ concerning the sale and disposition of 0.443 acre, more or less, known as the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station, Tax Map No. 111.00-1-17; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of a~~ ~~ to purchase this property for $ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ Q is hereby accepted; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\W p S I \agenda\realesta\bnc mtn AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 RESOLUTION 92491-8 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE VINTON SLUGGERS, PONYTAIL DIVISION, SOFTBALL TEAM FOR WINNING THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, the Vinton Sluggers, Ponytail Division, recently won the Virginia State Softball Championship; and WHEREAS, the Sluggers also placed fifth in the National Softball Championship; and WHEREAS, athletics are an important part in the development of the minds and bodies of young people, boys and girls alike, helping them to develop lifelong habits of exercise and teamwork. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its congratulations to the VINTON SLUGGERS, PONYTAIL DIVISION, on their outstanding accomplishment and statewide achievement; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes continued athletic ability and skill to each and every member of the team. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H -ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File f.. t` 1 ACTION NO. A-92491-9 ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Special Exception Request of Shelva Walker to operate a beauty shop at the residence, located at 6961 La Marre Drive, in the Hollins Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Unaware of County licensing requirements, petitioner commenced operating a beauty establishment at her residence in July 1991. At that time, the Commissioner of Revenue's office contacted Planning and Zoning staff which investigated and except for lack of Special Exception Permit and the associated business license, found the petitioner to be operating within the applicable regulations outlined below. Ms. Walker has filed documentation supporting her claim that an infirmity exists which impedes her ability to work outside the home. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: See attached staff report. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative 1: Approve the petition for a special exception to operate a beauty establishment as a home occupation, with condi- tions recommended by staff. Alternative 2: Deny the petition for a special exception permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, Terrance H rringt Director f Plan ing Approved by, ~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 2 Action Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson to Eddy Denied ( ) approve Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections STAFF REPORT ~,/°`«~ ~/ CASE NUMBER: SE-2-9/91 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETITIONER: SHELVA WALI~R DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 Petition of Shelva Walker to obtain a Special Exception Permit in order to operate a beauty shop at the residence, located at 6961 La Marre Drive, in the Hollins Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petition to obtain a Special Exception in order to operate a beauty shop as a home occupation. Hours of operation vary during the day, with no Saturday or Sunday operations. Petitioner states that a maximum of two additional vehicles may be at the residence at one time. b. Petitioner seeks approval to continue operating from home in order to supplement disability income. Ms. Walker was not aware of County licensing requirements prior to beginning operations in her home in July, 1991. At that time, the Commissioner of Revenue's office contacted Planning and Zoning staff which investigated and, except for lack of a Special Exception and the associated business license, found the petitioner to be operating within the applicable regulations outlined below. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The property is zoned R-1, single family residential. Home occupations are permitted uses in this district. b. Beauty and barbering establishments to be operated as home occupations may, after notice and public hearing, be permitted as a Special Exception only if an infirmity exists which prevents either the home operator of the occupation or a permanent occupant of the dwelling unit from regularly leaving the dwelling unit to pursue gainful employment. A special exception granted for beauty and barbering home occupations shall be for a period of one year and may be renewed administratively each year absent written complaint regarding home occupation by residents of the residential zone affected. A letter from Ms. Walker's physician, dated July 29, 1991 was submitted with her petition. This letter states that Ms. Walker "has severe chronic obstructive lung disease which greatly impairs her ability to work." The physician has also stated that Ms. Walker has lost most of her lung capacity. c. Beauty and barbering establishments to be operated as home occupations shall have no more than one chair and no retail sales of beauty or barber supplies shall occur. d. The Board of Supervisors may attach additional conditions to this special exception request. e. Roanoke County business license required. 2 f. Proper plumbing and electrical equipment and fixtures must be in-place prior to approval of business license. ~f~~ srrE CHARACI'ERIST'ICs TOPOGRAPHY: Level lot with one-story brick ranch. GROUND COVER: Residential landscaping. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Growth initiative for Peters Creek is to stimulate growth. GENERAL AREA is developed with single family housing. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 thru 5. 1 =positive impact, 2 =negligible impact, 3 =manageable impact, 4 =disruptive impact, 5 =severe impact, and N/A =not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation area. Policy NC-1 encourages protection of residential communities from disruptive impacts of land use changes. A beauty establishment as a home occupation could become a disruptive influence if the quantities of both customers and vehicles are not limited. 2 SURROUNDING LAND: Site is bordered by residential properties and VA Secondary Route 1815 (La Marre Drive). 2 NEIGHBORING AREA: Residential uses and additional local streets. 2 SITE LAYOUT: Home occupation is located within petitioner's dwelling. Existing driveway is used for parking, no on-street parking is anticipated. 2 ARCHITECTURE: Existing brick ranch. NL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: AMENITIES: 3 1VL NATURAL FEATURES: TRAFFIC ~ ~~ '"~ 2 STREET CAPACITIES: In 1986, average ADT for La Marre Drive between Ridgecrest Drive and Chester Avenue was 932. A twelve hour work period, (a high estimate in this case) with one customer each hour could produce 24 trip ends per day). Proposed use is a low traffic generator and should not negatively effect local street capacities. 2 CIRCULATION: La Marre Drive and connecting streets provide a through route for traffic. No on-street parking is expected. UTILITIES 2 WATER: Adequate source and distribution. 2 SEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Tinker Creek. NLA FLOODPLAIN: PUBLIC SERVICES 3 FIRE PROTECTION: Estimated 4-8 minute travel time. 3 RESCUE: Estimated 4-8 minute travel time. PARKS AND RECREATION: 1VLA SCHOOLS: TAX BASE 2 LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALUE: (Residential real estate only) $68,600 TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: TOTAL EMPLOYEES: TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: $775 ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOUS: 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: PLAN CONSISTENCY 4 `~"-~' This area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. Petitioner's request should be compatible with land use policies if the number of customers and cars permitted at any time is limited. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: None WBAI~IESSES: (1) Probable traffic increase if quantities of both customers and vehicles are not limited. (2) Potential neighborhood disruption unless customers and vehicles are limited. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: The following conditions are suggested if this request is approved: (1) Maximum two customers allowed on-site at any one time. (2) Maximum two customers' cars allowed on site at any one time. (3) Petitioner shall install plumbing and electrical equipment to chief building official's satisfaction before business license is issued. (4) Hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 am to 8:00 pm, Monday to Friday. ' ROANOKE COUNTY - APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION L'SE 9 ~/ _/ 1. Applica;~t's Name: .~f7C)YA WA~K~L Phcne: ~(~- ~~~g Address: lo9Gl LA/jIq/^rC 1]y; 2. Property owner's name ~-~ e 1 v~ _~iA 1K~1~ Address: ~Rlo 1 ,~/a (~AI^rC AK Phone: ~~~- ~,7s1~ ~oA/La d'~ YA- Zip: r?S~G/rj 3. Location of Property: ~ S~ ~ ~/d y!„grj,e ,~ Size of property acres~~ Size of proposed special exception use Z _/sq.ft. 4 . Tax Map # : ~.7,-b - Z.,,, - ~!~ Old Tax ~iap # : 5. Zoning Classification: p~ --~ 6. Magisterial District Location: Nt~w ~ g 7. Existing Land Use: RtS~i~~lfTtA -~ 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: ~j~~.( ~,~~~ ~ ~ ~~ c~c~t~~bN 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~cl~},i3t,Rµ~y~ L~~~~TiaA( 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: #~~~Db Value of Land Value of Proposed Buildings Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed ~_ 11. Check Completed Items: ~(. 8}" x 11" plot plan x Consultation ~_ List of adjacent property owners ~ Letter of Application _~ Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport $40 All other Special Exception Uses 12 . Date of Application: (~ , ~, to ~ /5 y' 13 . Applicant's Signature: ~~,~y,, /~~,~ 1. ~~, ~~ • ; ,; ~; ,. ,, c_. :,., `~) f 'c ,~ ,- c r~ - s ~ ,, ~ . _ ~~ .."'/ ~ 9, ~~~/ - ~~~~y ,~~~, .~, ~' 1 _ . ~~ ~ // 1~ ~~ ~~~ ~ w .ZB v~ ~ i2u .~ ~:~~ ~ ~ //////~ .ufu%t,c, ~~ 1,~u'-mac, ~ ~~~~~~ ~~a L~ .Ga %'r~~ l~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~° ~~ ~~~, a Lr~,~. ; ~ ~., . ~~ ~ ~~~., Win,., . ~-~~ ~. ~~ ~~~ ,, . ;~ ,-, :< ~. ~. -, C' r' C` ~. ~- t 99i-~ } ~ ~" ~ _ '~~~ G'~, V (yam `V {/~~~~~`~ {/ frt (` .~ r :. V ~~- X .A lr~ • «~ 1 f~ '3 • ~ ..~ i T ^i ' F + ~ ~ '~ ~ • t~-~r ~ - ~. { r ~ , `,, ! ti, j ' ~~ rte . ,~ r - Y .~ =,, ~ULMgNARY MEDICINE ASSOCIA~S James R. Castle, M.f~. ~/ rlw'~ Bruce N. Stewart, M.C. ! ~ Kirk E. Hippensteel, M.C. ~ Chest disease Robert C. Ke@ley, M.D. Occupational Lung ~ISease ~ i JeffE+rson Mcadicai Park ~ ~ Pulmonary Functionl'esting 111-A South Jofierson Street Arterial Blood Gases Roanoke, Virginia 24016 i ! Pulmonary ExerciseTesting (7031 342-6701 ' it !i July 29, 1991 To Whom It May Concern: .,- Re: Shelva Walker SS~I: 226-46-1461 h This woman has severe chronic obstructive lung disease which greatly impairs her ability to work. I am a lung specialist who follows her for this severe condition. She has severe enough function to qualify for complete Social Security disability but is interested in contin- uing some work in the home if possible, which I have encouraged. Work at home is easier on her than work outside the home because she can control her environment such better there to make it so her breathing does not get aggravated by such work. It is therefore necessary for her to have this working area at home or else she is left with not working at all which psychologically I do not think is a good idea for her. If you have any further questions regarding her medical condition and recuirements of work environment, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, KEH/vs dt:7/30/91 ~„~t,L ~ /~! i ,•.~~7wr lJ~.-ice Kirk E. Hip ensteel, M.D. ee ', I °Pi/~ .~ a o_ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ d ~ ~aT z3 LoJ- 2/ ~ [or 2 z ,6tocr s a~ h as .;, w' 504 6 `~. 3 ~ ¢Z.O ~ ~• o~rd N /~~ b~G~ l~ yi 3. >.~ ~ 5 s3.s~ ~~ a s ~'~- h9~ ~~ \ ho ~ ~~1Ja~ PEI ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~a ~ \ ~P ~o~ ego ~ ~scy:~!1¢=zs~ 23./9' ~'~ ¢~ - - -~ ,qlC. 9/. // '~- il!SZ:¢O N! ,Q,yO. /,20.00 , rA./ ¢~ ee .. I' ~ /Nb~CT IMrallt q Iwt vts>t><M TMti~ MAMA -~g1ra~ -~woo It~Wi I~QIMMfsi 1~1~ttltATlgl. I. ~~ ~c T. P. PARKER Z tµo ~ ~ ~-,o. , 4Y0 `° ~LAMD N~1 SURVEY FOR OF ~Ol 1 ? BOCK .9 SEC. 3 SUM/1'lE,QOEAr/ ~~ -~77 P• B. 3 ~ 96 ~JG~ L n• 1'i~iZ ~ ~T ~S~-//53 ,P0~9//OCE G'pl/~/ry V1lIGfMIA H.s. 6. 9 CALC. SCALE: ~'- •~~ eY: T. P. PARKER & SON DATE: //O(/ /~p c oRAwN B• /~ cK'D. ~ ENGINEERS i SURVEYORS ,LTD. ,•..- +oe~ __ _ _ 6AlEM VIRGINIA w.o. /Z9/ D_ 297/9 99/-~ J • ew~e,lun lNgdnl el gwmNe AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 92491-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .71 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6426 MERRIMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 97.06-1-6) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF 301 GILMER ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 27, 1991, at which time it was referred back to the Planning Commission. Thereafter, the amended ordinance was brought before the Board of Supervisors for a second reading and public hearing on September 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1991, and September 3, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, McGraw A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney PETITIONER: 301 GILMER ASSOCIATES ~ ~~'~" CASE NUMBER: 19-8/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 1991 & September 3, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 27, 1991 & September 24, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of 301 Gilmer Associates to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow aself-storage facility, located at 6426 Memman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commission commented that Roanoke County sold the property in good faith, the owner bought in good faith and now it appears that we are trying to restrict whether or not they can tear the building down; there is no covenant in the deed that prevents the demolition of the building. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Pine trees, S feet tall, will be planted every 10 feet at the rear and school side yard of the property. 2) The exterior of the existing building will remain brick. There will be approximately five garage (roll-up) doors at the rear of the building. Door colors will be of earth tone color. 3) The facility will not be utilized for the following: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; private off-street parking lots; and indoor flea markets; no outside boat or recreational vehicle storage. 4) No new mini-warehouses will be constructed on the site. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with the additional proffer. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Massey, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Chappelle F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Proffers .~ Terrance Ha ngton ecretary Roanoke C unty Planning Commission ~~~~ TO: Planning Commission~~II FROM: Terry Harrington ' N• DATE: August 29, 1991 RE: Rezoning Request of 301 Gilmer Associates; Board of Supervisors Referral of Request back to Planning Commission for Consideration of Additional Proffers. At your August meeting, the Commission recommended approval of this request. Conditions were offered that limited the use of the property, and controlled the exterior materials of the building. (See attached transmittal report to the Board) At their meeting on August 27th, the Board indicated a desire to see a proffer that would prohibit the construction of new mini- warehouses on the property. They also questioned whether the proposed proffers prohibit the demolition of the existing building. They asked the applicant to consider proffers along these lines, and they referred the request back to the Commission for further review. I expect that the applicant will consider these additional proffer ideas by your meeting on Tuesday. If new proffers are submitted, there- is no need to hold a public hearing. The Commission may review these proffers at your meeting on the 3rd, and forward your comments to the Board at that time. MEMORANDUM TO: Terry Harrington, Director Planning and Zoning FROM Mary Allen Clerk to the Board DATE: August 29, 1991 SUBJECT: 301 Gilmer Associates Petition Attached is a synopsis of the public hearing discussion regarding the request of 301 Gilmer Associates to rezone land on Merriman Road for mini-warehouses. The petition was referred back to the Planning Commission so that the petitioner could proffer additional conditions. °r PETITION OF 301 GILMER ASSOCIATES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 27, 1991 Mr. Eddy asked if the proffered conditions were sufficient to ensure that the petitioners follow through with plans. Mr. Harrington responded that there were no proffers that would prohibit that building from being removed and traditional mini-warehouses being constructed except for space limitations on the site. Mr. McGraw felt that since the proffers stated that the existing building would remain brick, the exterior of the building would stay. Mr. Harrington agreed but stated there was nothing to prohibit razing the building. The proffer only specifies that the existing building would remain brick as long as it was standing. Mr. McGraw reminded the Board that this happened on a Hop-In rezoning several years ago on Peters Creek Road. The Board assumed that an office building would be between the Hop-In and neighborhood which was not the case. Mr. Eddy asked if it would be possible to send the petition back to the Planning Commission to work out a satisfactory assurance that the building would remain. Mr. Harrington responded that this could be accomplished. Mr. Johnston, with 301 Gilmer Associates, advised that they did not plan to demolish the building and plan to keep the existing exterior. Mini warehouses is planned as an interim use. They would be willing to submit a proffer that the building would not be demolished and new mini-warehouses would not be constructed on the site. Mr. Johnson advised that the Board could not legally accept the proffers at this time. The best approach would be to refer the petition back to the Planning Commission. Dr. Nickens asked why the Board could not assume that the building would remain both because of the proffer stating the existing building would remain brick and the petitioner's public statement that he wold not raze the building. Mr. Mahoney responded that the language in the proffer does not state that the building would remain and would not be razed and a judge might not rule in the County's favor in a legal case. Dr, Nickens moved to deny the petition and expressed concern that this was not discussed with the Planning staff or at the Commission hearing. Mr. Johnson suggested referring the petition back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Mahoney responded that the petition could be referred back to the Planning Commission or the Board could continue the public hearing. However, the proffer ~' 9f -.z- must be in writing prior to the public hearing. Denial would mean the petitioner could not come back with the request for a year. Dr. Nickens withdrew his motion. Mr. Johnson moved to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for their next meeting. Mr. Mahoney advised that a first reading was not necessary. The motion passed by unanimous recorded vote. `~9/ .~. STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 19-8/91 PETITIONER: 301 GILMER ASSOCIAT88 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: AUGIIST 6, 1991 Petition of 301 Gilmer Associates to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow a self-storage facility, located at 6426 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to improve an existing 4,000 sq.ft. building in order to construct five to nine self storage mini-warehouse units within the current building footprint. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project further. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-1 , Light Industrial District permits a variety of light industrial uses. The owner has proffered to plant five-foot tall pine trees every 10 feet at the rear (east) and side (north) property lines. Petitioner has also proffered to retain the brick exterior of the building and to apply earth tone colors to the rear roll-up garage doors. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Predominantly flat; very gentle rise toward center of site. GROUND COVER: Grass; existing, centrally-located brick building. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. This area has been designated for stable growth. Urban services are available. GENERAL AREA is developed with residential, institutional, and industrial uses. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. 2 RATING FACTOR COMMENTS ~ ~'f LAND IISE COMPATIBILITY 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Warehousing land uses are normally discouraged with low compatibility in Core designated areas. The proposal is not consistent with policy C-2 (provide arterial or higher grade street service to each Core area). Proposed use is consistent with policies C-4 (coordinate site design creating a minimum of public street/vehicular access points and building size, shape, height, and materials to complement adjacent buildings) and C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering along Core boundaries to reduce nuisances with less intensive development. Self-storage or mini-warehouse uses are not mentioned under Core land use applications of mixed use development referred to by policy C-1. 3 SIIRROIINDING LAND: Adjacent uses include institutional; heavily traveled major collector highway and an industrial access road; immediately south and east of the two roads, single family residential, office commercial, and general industrial uses occur. 2 NEIGHBORING AREA: Single family residential; service commercial; parks and open space; woodland. 3 SITE LAYOIIT: Sharply constrained by small size of property and existing building (approximately 4,000 sq.ft.). Single access encircling building will begin and end with Merriman Road at northwest corner of site. Customers will park outside rear units to load/unload vehicles. These storage units will average approximately 600 sq.ft. each. Customers renting units without individual access will park north of loop road and use front door. These storage units are estimated at a maximum of 100 sq. ft. each. 3 ARCHITBCTIIRE: This building has been recognized by Frazier Associates as an historic resource. Its exact significance has not yet been determined. Existing brick exterior to remain by proffer. A maximum of five roll-up garage doors at the rear of the building will bear earth tone paint to match brick effect. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: The petitioner has proffered to plant five foot tall pine trees, ten feet apart along the property's north and east boundaries (also see suggested proffers). Per the ordinance land use intensity matrix, no plantings, screen, or buffer yard are required. Petitioner intends to plant evergreen shrubs between the building front and Merriman Road. Existing hardwood south of proposed entrance will remain. 4 AMENITIES: Concept plan indicates no parking spaces. Ordinance requires one space due to building size and one per 1-1/2 employees (no employees anticipated). Ample space remains north of access road to construct parking stalls for 4-5 customers who will not have drive-up access to individual storage units (see site layout). ~~ 3 Those customers who will have drive-up access to rear units must park parallel to the building to provide emergency equipment adequate room to pass. Fire & Rescue Dept. will require the installation of fire lane signs to ensure a minimum width travel aisle. 3 NATURAL AMENITIES: Site rests within a naturally low basin and includes well-defined drainage ditches on south and west borders. See Drainage Floodplain. TRAFFIC 2 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT: 2,841 (.9 mi. segment of Merriman Road from Commonwealth Drive to Crystal Creek Road. 1986 ADT: 242 (.3 mi. segment of Commonwealth Drive from Merriman Road to Corrugated Container site. 1987: 2 accidents on Merriman Road between Starkey Road and approximate intersection with Meadowlark Road; none on Commonwealth Drive. Proposed use is expected to generate fewer than 20 vehicle trip-ends per day. 3 CIRCULATION: Proposed access from Merriman Road; no connection to Commonwealth Drive is planned. Unless traffic generated exceeds expectations, no need for "one-way" flow is anticipated. Customers using rear storage units will be parking in a portion of the travel aisle. See site layout and amenities for further discussion. UTILITIES 2 WATER: Existing well; 12" Starkey water .line expected to be in place along Merriman Road by mid-1992. 2 SEWER: Existing 8" line available along Merriman Road. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Back Creek sub-basin. No stormwater detention required if interior loop access road is graveled rather than paved. 4 FLOODPLAIN: Engineering staff reports that building was surrounded by floodwaters in 1985 and that a detailed study of the 100 year flood level is needed. Engineering also recommends floodproofing foundation and basement areas (possibly raising or sealing ground-level walls). PUBLIC SERVICES 3 FIRE PROTECTION: Currently lacks hydrant service (see utilities, water). Tanker truck service available (marginal 4-5 minute estimated response time). 3 RESCUE: Marginal with regard to established service standard (4- 5 minute estimated response time). N1A PARRS AND RECREATION: NLA SCHOOLS: s..~.,, 4 TAX BASE 2 LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALOE: $150,000 TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: Unknown TOTAL EMPLOYEES: 0 TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COIINTY/YEAR: Approximately $1,695 improved real estate only ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOILS: 2 NOISE: 3 SIGNAGE: Not specified. Industrial district regulations call for 1-1/2 sq.ft. of signage per frontage foot and not more than one freestanding sign on site. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. Mini-warehouse/self storage is consistent with policy C-4 due to minimum number of access points onto Merriman Road and the complementary aspects of the existing building and with C-5 when separation, screening and buffering are provided to reduce nuisances with less intensive development. The proposal is inconsistent with policy C-2 due to the lack of an arterial highway or higher grade street network. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: 1) Consistency with Core Policies C-4 and C-5. 2j Infill nature of proposal. 3) Petitioner has proffered to plant evergreen trees along north and east borders of subject site. 4) Petitioner has proffered to retain building's existing exterior and to apply earth tone colors to garage doors at the rear. WEAKNESSES: 1) Proposal is inconsistent with Core Policy C-2. 2) Subject site has suffered from flooding in the past. 3) Wide variety of possible future M-1 district uses poses the threat of incompatibility with nearby land uses. 4) Proposal would convert a building recognize3 as an historic resource into a storage operation. PROFFERS SUGGESTED: 1) On-site uses will be limited to the following: wholesale business, storage warehouses; public utilities; silk screen material processing and similar operations. 2) No outside boat or recreational vehicle storage shall be permitted. 301 GILMER ASSOCIATES Post Office Box 1138 Roanoke, Virginia 24006 (703) 982-1210 (703) 982-2829 PROFFERED CONDITIONS Petitioner: 301 Gilmer Associates Property: 6426 Merriman Road, S. W. ~~". ,,~, 1. Pine Trees, 5 feet tall, will be planted every ten feet at the rear and (school) side yard of the property. 2. The exterior of the existing building will remain brick. There will be approximately five garage (roll-up) doors at the rear of the building. Door colors will be of "earth tone" color. 3. The facility will not be utilized for the following: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; private off-street parking lots; and indoor flea markets; no outside boat or fi M'i recreational vehicle storage. ~i Ne~v 4. Noimini-warehouses will be constructed on the site. ~`~ .. .fir ~ iri ~~; ~ r ,~~ ~ ~• ~ .r ., ;~ .~ • .u • 4. i •, ~~ ~~ • ~) t ~ Q ~'•' ~- ~d ~~ , u~ ~A ~ ~ n .) n -- ~ ~~ u i'~ • ~ ~ 1 ~. ~ • a ~ ~ 1 .~ •--~ ~• ~ n N •- Q ~./~1 /~ • ~-r F+~ GST ~1Grrs.~lr~lrey S~~oo ~ ~ ~ /.. 1 • ~ a,e~ . ,.. i l ~f ~ ~ • • ~ ~ , 1~I hli 1:::~ is i ~; 1 e7i ~7 Ger ' ~r'•~T, ~Tgtkty t•I'b,~M` Bw~ ~ -uT SNOMING DIVISION :L:..~.~_~,', .•=- ~~~~ 3oi 6~/~+Qit. ~'l~eciwyy,s OF /NO-ENTY (0.71 AC.) fOR ~Q ~~ ;:..:~ ~~'/r THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARU ~~`.,r;,su~.vy`':°' Of ROAr;OKt COUNTY. YIkGINIA ''• •-~•- ~~S iittw SITWTED ON THE EAST iIOE YA. SEC. ROUTE X613 II~~ ., CAPE f-aINO NA61iTEt1Al OISTNICT ~OAN01(E COUNTY. YINGINIA ~~ ~`' 60' o~n: 16 JUNE IYB3 ~{IP0~0 T. t{MIMOiM r AN06A*1f~ I C fMOMiM-MIIIVE~OM w~~ aNnwA ~ u 99~ -2 NORT9 ., ______ ~ ~~~ rio s: s-3-t r• poor s • ~' R1 s ~ .•. ~~ M2 u .~ ~+ a 0 _~ 0 3 2 i i ~~ ~ i/l ~~ .~- /" i ~' ..- -- COMMUNITYSERYICBS 3~1 Gilr~er f?ssociates AND DBVBLOPMBNT 9 ~ • o~- 0A 1-06 r-1 tC 'i-1 ~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .71 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6426 MERRIMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 97.06-1-6) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF 301 GILMER A83OCIATEB WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 27, 1991, at which time it was referred back to the Planning Commission. Thereafter, the amended ordinance was brought before the Board of Supervisors for a second reading and public hearing on September 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1991, and September 3, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .71 acre, as described herein, and located at 6426 Merriman Road, (Tax Map Number 97.06-1-6) in the Cave Spring Magisterial. District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of M-l, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of 301 Gilmer Assooites. ~i -.-~.. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. Pine trees (5 feet tall) will be planted every 10 feet at the rear and school side yard of the property. b. The exterior of the existing building will remain brick. There will be approximately five garage (roll up) doors at the rear of the building. Door colors will be of earth tone color. c. The facility will not be utilized for the BEGINNING at corner 1, an iron pin set, being in the easterly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 613 (Merriman Road) and also being the southwesterly corner of Corrugated Containter Corp.; thence, leaving Corrugated Container Corp. and with Virginia Secondary Route 613 with a curve to the left which curve is defined by a delta angle of 1° 52' 45", a radius of 7927.87 feet, an arc of 260.02 feet, a chord of 260.00 feet and chord bearing N. 24° 46' 08" W. to corner 2, an iron pin set; thence, leaving Virginia Secondary Route 613 and with the following two new division lines through property of the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, N. 64° 30' 00" E. 125.71 feet to corner 3, an iron pin set; ~'~~-.~ thence, S. 27° 08' 30" E. 218.17 feet to corner 4, an iron pin set, said corner being on the westerly property line of Corrugated Containter Corp. S. 47° 17' W. 141.62 feet to corner 1, the place of BEGINNING, and containing 0.71 acres as more particularly shown on plat prepred by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors, Roanoke, Virginia, dated 16 June 1983. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51 \agenda\zoning\gilmer .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE 92491-11 AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT- PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ERECT A SELF-SUPPORTING COMMUNICATION TOWER LOCATED OFF TWELVE O'CLOCR KNOB ROAD IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF CELLULAR ONE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 22, 1991 and the second reading and public hearing was held September 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 3, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing 31 acres, as described herein, and located at off Twelve O'Clock Knob Road, (Tax Map Number 66.00-1- 12.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Cellular One. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 694, also known as Twelve O'Clock Knob Road, on the line of the property now owned by Peggy L. Moulse and on the line of the Julia C. Powell property; thence leaving said point of beginning and following a line between said property owners S. 42° 57' W. 180.58 feet to an old pipe; thence continuing between said properties, N. 87° 48' 15" W. 449.41 feet to a point; thence S. 64° 41' 45" W. 236.79 feet to a point; thence continuing between said properties, S. 84° 41' 45" W. 462.00 feet to an old iron on top of the mountain; thence along the top of the mountain with a line between the June M. Manoogian property and the property herein described, N. 5° 00' W. 561 feet to a point; thence continuing with same, N. 17° 30' W. 561 feet to a point, corner to the John R. Goodman property; thence with the Goodman property, then the Charles E. Johnston property and the property herein described, N. 40° 30' E. 500 feet to a point; thence with the division line between Tracts #1 and #2, N. 87° 25' S0" E. 405.15 feet to a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 694; thence with a new division line following the center of Route 694 and dividing Tract #1 of the Peggy L. Moulse property and with the following courses, S. 50° 08' 25" W. 41.80 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 143.42 feet and whose radius is 80.06 feet (chord equals S. 1° 10' 47" E. 124.99 feet) to a point; thence S. 52° 30' E. 63.06 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right whose arc is 263.82 feet and whose radius is 197.27 feet (chord equals S. 14° 11' 12" E. 244.60 feet) to a point; thence continuing with the center of the road, S. 24° 09' W. 121.14 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 98.88 feet and whose radius is 269.87 feet (chord equals S. 13° 37' 47" W. 98.33 feet) to a point; thence S. 3° 08' W. 41.22 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 92.79 feet and whose radius is 100.47 feet (chord equals S. 23° 19' 25" E. 89.53 feet) to a point; thence S. 49° 46' S0" E. 42.66 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right whose arc is 96.74 feet and whose radius is 155.07 feet (chord equals S. 31° 54' 32" E. 95.18 feet) to a point; thence S. 14° 02' 15" E. 63.87 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 354.79 feet and whose radius is 308.10 feet (chord equals S. 47° 01' 37" E. 335.51 feet) to a point; thence S. 80° 01' E. 87.14 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 72.25 feet and whose radius is 89.66 feet (chord equals S. 55° 58' 30" E. 73.06 feet) to a point; thence continuing with the center line of Route 694, S. 31° 56' E. 28.74 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing approximately 31 acres and being as shown on map titled Partial Survey for G. Hampton Moulse dated March 31, 1983, Revised February 8, 1984, by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. 4. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. That the total height of shall not exceed 114 feet as determined by the FAA to present no hazard to air navigation. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: Supervisors Robers, Johnson A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney j < PETITIONER: CELLULAR ONE CASE NUMBER: 4-2/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 3, 1991 (cont. from February 5, 1991) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 24, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of Cellular One to obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to erect aself-supporting communication tower, located off of Twelve O'clock Knob Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if anyone from FAA-New York was in Roanoke when the determination was made. Ms. Bolton replied that the local tower responded to FAA's request for comment but does not know if any other FAA representative H•as here. In response to the Commission, Mr. Basham said that he has already invested a great deal of money for the site and that locating another site would be too expensive at this point. The Commission expressed concern that a study has not been prepared addressing guidelines for towers; in particular, aesthetics, property values, health and welfare of citizens. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS Total height shall not exceed 114 feet as determined by the FAA to present no hazard to air navigation. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Massey, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Chappelle F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. of petition with proffered condition. The G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report X Other Terrance H gton, S retary Roanoke unty Pl g Commission 99i-3 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington ~~~~~ DATE: August 29, 1991 RE: Cellular One Request; Transmission Tower; Twelve O'clock Knob As you know, this request has been tabled for a number of months while the applicant waited for the FAA Regional Office to formally comment on their application. The Regional Office has now reviewed this application and has not objected to the placement of the tower at this location. Ms. Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport, and the local FAA Tower have objected to the placement of this tower at this location. Because of the comments of the Regional FAA office, the local tower is now prohibited from making any further comments on this request. It is my understanding from discussions with Ms. Shuck, that the local tower continues to have concerns about the placement of this tower. The difference of opinion betveen local airport officials, and the Regional FAA office in Jamaica New York, seems to be based upon two factors. First, according to Ms. Shuck, the Regional Office is primarily concerned with structures and facilities which interfere with the instrument (electronic) approaches of aircraft. Apparently, if a tower is lighted, the FAA's attitude is that pilots will see the obstruction and turn, if necessary, to avoid a collision. Second, local officials are sore knowledgeable of the severe physical constraints that influence flight patterns in this area. Poor Mountain, Twelve O'clock Knob, Tinker Mountain and Read Mountain all limit the flight paths for commercial and general aviation aircraft using the airport. The communication towers on these mountains contribute to these restrictions, and further reduce the air space available for safe approaches and takeoffs. Although some of the existing towers on Twelve O'clock Knob, and all of the towers on Poor Mountain are at an elevation higher than the proposed tower, local airport officials do not believe that it is appropriate policy to further aggravate the problem by allowing additional towers in these critical approach and takeoff zones. Airport Commission W. 2obert Herbert, Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Joel M. Schlonger Richard W. Robers Kit B. Kiser 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Yrginia 24012 (703) 362-1999 FAX (703)563-4838 Jacqueline L Shuck, Executive Director Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager Raava~ ~on~ soar September 3, 1991 IPir. Terry Harrington Roanoke County Planning and Zoning Department P, O. Box 29840 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Harrington: Despite the FAA's determination of "no hazard" for the proposed antenna for Cellular One, on behalf of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, I object to the construction of the tower. While the proponent and the FAA do not dispute that the tower will penetrate the FAR Part 77 surface, the determination of "no hazard" appears to be made primarily because there are already other towers or "hazards" in the area. As stated in the FAA's response "This proposed antenna is adverse by introducing an addi- tional obstruction into an airport environment which is already heavily encumbered by obstructions both manmade and natural terrain. When this structure is properly obstruction marked and lighted, it will pose no greater impact to aircraft opera- tion than the existing conditions." In other words, errors made in the past will be multiplied, not rectified in the future. I find this especially true in this case since Cellular One already has a facility at this location, but seeks to replace it with a new tower which is even higher. When Contel wants to increase the size of its toyer, or a new cellular system wants to compete on 12 O'Clock Knob, will the rationale be that the towers are just a little taller or that there are already towers present? How high will the towers be permitted to go and will there never be an opportunity to undo the harm which has been done in the past? Terry Harrington September 3, 1991 Page Two ~/ "` Despite the FAA's response, I do believe that the modified Cellular One tower will continue and aggravate the negative immpact on the visual or VFR traffic into the airport. This traffic is not controlled by the FAA tower. Since most of our operations are VFR and our private plane operations are double o•.~r commercial flights, I believe this impact is significant anri oL~j ect to the construction of the tower. Very truly yours, J eline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS : csp ., US Department SYSTEM MANAGEMENT BRANCH, AEA-530 of TrpnSportotrgn AIIt TRAFFIC DIVISION/EASTERN REGION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMYNI$TRATION Federal Aviation FzTZGERALD FEDERAL BUILDING Adminlsfrotlon JFR INTERNATZONAY, AIRPORT JAMAICA, NEW YORI{ 7.1430 DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARb TO AIR NAVI~ATIQN rN REhY NEfER TO AERONAUTICAL STUOY No. 90-A>:A-1896-OE ~, CONSTRUCTION LOCATION Century Roanoke Cellular Corp. c c/o Lukas, McGowan, Nace & Gutierrez t~t;NAME i 1819 li Street, N.W., 7th Floor Salem, VA d Washington, DC 20006 N u-ntuoE ~oNGnvoE 3715-02 80-0500 • DESCf11PT10N Hf~GNTpNfEETt CONSTRUCTION Antenna Towex' - cellular A0i 4 "D " 25'4 PROPOSED An aeronautical study of the proypsed Construction described above has been comptettrd under the provisions of Part' ~7 of the Federal Avlatlpn Regulations. Based On the study ~: rs found that tho construction would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efflCiont utilization of the navrgabte airspace by airuaft or on the Operation of air navigation facilit~es.'Cherefore, pursuant to the authority deregaled tome, it Is hereby determined that the COnStruCtiDn would not be a hazard to err navigation provided the tptipwrng conditions are rMl; Conditions: This structure shall be marked and lighted in accordance with Advisory Circular AC 74/7460-1G Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 9. Supplemenlat notice of construction is required any time the project is abandoned (use the encoesed FAA form), pr [~ At least s8 hours Mtoro tM start o1 Construction (use the enclosed FAA form). Q Within five days after the construction raacr-es its gredlest height (use the enclosed FAA form). This determination expires on March 14 , 1992 unless: (a) extended,revised or terminated by the issuing office; (D) th® Construction is wb¢ect to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission end an appliCetion for a construction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such case the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of Construction, or on the date the FCC denies the apaiprtion. NOTE: Request for extension of the effective period of this determination must be postmarked or dolivere4 to the issuing oft)ce at least 16 days p-lor t0 the expiration dace. This determination is subJad to t+eview it an interested party tiles a petition on or before Sep t ember 4 1991 . In the event a petition for review ittiled• A should be submitted in triplicate to the Manager, Flight Inlarllatwn and ObstruCtipns Branch, MT• 210, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, O.C. 20591, and Contain a fut! statement of the bass upon wniph it is made. This detsMrttnatlon becomes final txt Se tember 14 i 991 unless a petition for review is tlmery toed, in which Case tM determination wilt not become Tina! pending disposition of the petition, Interested paAies will be notified 01 the grant of any review. An account Of the alUdy findings, a4NOnaUtiCIII ObJetlipnS, it any, registered with the FAA during the study, and the basis for the FM's decision In this matter will be found on the Idtowing page(s). If the structure is subJett to tM tiosnsing authority of Cho FCC, a Copy of this determination writ W sent to that Agency. This determination, issued In accordance with FAA Part >7, concerns the effect of this proposal on the safe and efliclent uas of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relievo iha sponsor of any compliance responsibilities reteling to any law, OrdlnanCS, or tegulatiort 01 any Federal, State, Or IoCel government body. This proposal is to construct an antenna tower on 7.2 O'clock Knob, a ridge approximately 7 nautical miles (NM) southwest of Roanoke Airport, Roanoke, Virginia. sxsNEo /~^-s~.i ~T~Airepace Specialist, System Management $ranch ranc s an, r. r6buEOw Jamaica. NY or,r August S, 1991 FAA Form 7460.9 (?/N) tUPEpSEOES t+'REVIOUS CDITION Page 1 pf ~ Pegq ROAti;<= AIRPORT TEL No.703-X63-838 Aug 7.91 12 52 NC.~J1 P.03 AERONAUTICAL STUDY N0. 90-AEA-1896-OE At that location, the proposed antenna would~excee3 the Obstruction Standards of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows: r Section 77.23(a)(5) Airport Sux'faces by penetrating Runway 6 Section 77.25 (d) Runway Approach Surface by the full filed height. The proposed structure exceeds, because the terrain exceeds. Negotiations wore attempted with the proponent, but resulted in a request for further study at full filed height. This proposal was cix'cularized for comment on May 15, 2991. Objection was received. The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission objects to anything that will further restrict the utility of the airport. Specific points are transition areas for aircraft and helicopters, planned new approaches and departure criteria. The $eronautical study disclosed: The runway referred to in the circular is actually Runway 6 vice Runway 5. Magnetic declination has runway heading at 056 degrees, therefore, Runway 6. This proposal does not impact any airport traffic patterns. This proposal does not impact any instrument terminal procedure. This proposal is for a structure which exceeds Obstruction Standards and will be on terrain which is more than one thoc:sand feet above airport elevation. This proposal wi1J, increase the height of the terrain by an additional 114 feet above ground level. This structure shall be required to be obstruction marked and lighted with red obstruction lighting and marking. White lighting is not recommended due to runway alignment. This proposal will not impact any VFR or IFR enroute procedure. This proposal is in an area where aircraft, including helicopters, transition for la»ding and from departing. When properly obstruction marked and lighted, this proposed object will not interfere with a substantial amount of operations, as most operations should be well above it. Thf s airport has plans on file for improved approaches. This proposal will not interfere with any plans on file. 99i -3 AERONAUTYCAL STUDY N0. 90~AEA-1896-OE This proposed antenna is adverse by introducing an additional obstruction into an airport environment which is already heavily encumbered by obstructions both manmade and natural terx'ain. When this structure is properly obstruction marked and lighted, it will pose no greater impact to aircraft operation than the existing conditions. Therefore, a Determination of _No Hazard to Ai~,_Nav~gation fs issued. This determination does not include temporary construction equipment, such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during the actual construction phase of this proposal. Such equipment which has a height greater than the proposed structure and a height which would exceed the notice standard of Qart 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations requires separate notice. No appurtenances will be added to this structure that would exceed the height specified above. This determination issued in accordance with Federal. Aviation Regulations, Part 77, concerns the effect of this proposal on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of any compliance responsib~.lities relating to any law, ordinance, ox regulation of any Federal, state, or local governmental, body. This decision is based solely on the~foregoinq description of the structure/s, which includes location, height, ERP, and operating Frequency. The FAA hereby requests that notice be given for any future construction or alteration that Would exceed the above described heights, include any inczease to the ERP, alter the transmitta~ng frequency, and/or add other transmitting device/s. ~~?px: :,mmission v: Bert Herbert, Chairman 3~~ .Johnson. Vice Chairman ~~ M. Schlanger r<C~ard W Robers K- ? ~Ciser 520 'ration Drive Roa-ace. Virginia 20012 (70:,, 362-1999 FAX '7rJ3) 563-483$ ~'~/i~ Ja-_~-eline L. Shuck, Executive Director R:~? C. Fbole, Airport Manager ~c~va~ June 13, 1991 R~a~ Mr. Francis T. Jordan, Jr. Airspace Specialist System Management Branch, AEA-530 Air Traffic Division/Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration Fitzgerald Federal Building JFK International Airport Jamaica, NY 11430 Dear Mr. Jordan: ~ ~--a ~ ~ JUN I9 pQ.,a,T - ~ cxx~rrx Re: Aeronautical Study No. 90-AEA-1896-OE Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the pr~xsed construction of an antenna tower on 12 O'clock Knob. On behalf of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, join in the reply of the Roanoke Tower (copy attached) and objet to construction of this antenna. As the. operator of an ext:~.~.ely constrained airport facility, I request that the FAA not ac= in a manner which would further restrict the utility of the ai ~c~t, especially in VFR weather con~itions. Very truly yours, cqueline L. Shuck tm cc: Mr. Scott Basham, Cellular One Ms. Anita McMillan, Roanoke County Planning and Zoning Department _-- rv Memorandum U S. Departme•t or ~'~«'°"«' COPY FOR YOUR Federal Avkrtiot- INFORMATION Admfnlsfratlon ~ ,~~~ _ . subject: Aeronautical Study No. 90-AEA-1896-OE oars: May 24, 1991 Repy to From: Air Tc of f i c 1•tanayer, Roanoke Tower au". or HWi lburn Tc: i•lanayer, AEA•-530, System Management Branch Attn: Frznk Jordan Rc~arroke Tower oi~jects to ttre construction of ttris antenna for several reasc~rrs. Fir: t ttte area of the proposed construction is a very iinportarrt VFR traffic area for aircraft transitioning from t.lie Roan~k? Regional Airport to the Blacksburg/Virginia Tech Airport and tt~e Pulaski/New River Valley Airport. Also for aircraft trarrsitiorriny from the New Rlver Valley area through the Roanoke valley to t.tt~ Lynctrt~urg area, especially in etarginal VFR weather. i•lany helicopters transition this area including Med-evac flights. This area is tt~e route used by Special VFR aircraft into and out of the Roanoke ARSA. Due to Poor Mountain; 12 NM west, elevation 4041 feet, arrd trigh terrain south of Poor Mountain the proposed site is tt-e only area of low terrain for the transition of aircraft east and west irr the Roanoke Valley. Althou7li ttre l~rellmlrtary study indlcates no instrument impact, there ace tcvo corrslcierations presented for further study. First t~eginning Pt~iy 2A, 1991, a test t•ticrowave Landing System is being evaluated on Roarroke's Runway 6. One of the objectives of the t•llcrowave lrr:~t,allation is to more closely align the approach with t.lre centerline of Runway 6. This would bring the protected area for tt~e t•1LS instrument procedure closer to the proposed constrict iort area. Secondly the Aeronautical Study of Proposed Construction or Alteration transmitted to this facility states: "Section 77.230)(5) Airport Surfaces by penetrating Runway 5 Section 77.25(cl) Runway Approach Surface by the full filed height." Roanoke currently Iran rro Rr_rnway 5 but a Runway 6, actual runway treaclirrg o56. We request that the instrument impact be reevaluated based on Runway 6 and that the data base be changed to reflect Runway 6. Aclclit.ional cotrsiclerations are that Runway 24 jet departures second stage climb requirements may be affected by the construction of additional ~~r~t.rrirra, in this area, Rost of our jet aircraft depart Runway 24 on t»acaing 235 and many turbo props depart Runway 24 on assigned headings 220 and 250. Roanoke Regional Airport is presently conciurt irrg a FAR Part 150 Noise Study. At tt~e present time this runway 24 departure sequence is the most valuable to the movement of aircraft departing Roanoke Reglonal Airport and future rrolse considerations. s: -2- Any c'<,n;tnict.ic~n that would derogate IFR arrivals to P:lnway 6 or airy d~i~~~rt~ttes r~Ef Run:~ay 24 would adversely affect Roar,©ke Tower's ability to tnc>v~ oi.~r traffic. Restrictions to the use of Runway G anti ]t~inri.~y 74 fc~C Air Carrier, Commuter and Corporate aircraft would have an adverse impact on their services to this community and t;lie local economy. John D. Hinkle hmw CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARTHUR K. PETERS RADIO TELEVISION 7020 N.W. ItrH PLACE GAINESVILLE,fLORIDA 32605 CATV COMMON CARRIER r sot, 331 -O 119 August 26, 1991 fAX:1904,331-6026 Mr. Scott Barham Century Roanoke Cellular 5228 Valley Pointe Parkway, Suite 2 Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Dear Scott ~'/ --3 MEMBER AfCCE This is to follow up on our telephone conversation this morning concerning the Roanoke 12 O'clock Knob site. We will address three issues here: Radio propagation technicalities, FAA considerations and bcal airport matters. You are proposing to increase the overall height of your structure from 60' to 114' at 12 O'clock Knob. This is primarily because the coverage from your present antenna is inadequate. After our discussions, we have determined that the principal reason for inadequate coverage is the fact that your antenna is not above the level of the trees. Factors such as defraction and refraction of signals from tree leaves are common at cellular frequencies. Wet leaves also block signals. It is not sufficient to simply place your antenna immediately above the trees. Because the site is a high one, the signals will actuary require clearance above the trees sloping down the slopes. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain a fairly good elevation above the nearest trees so the signals may propagate out and down, simuttaneousy. I would recommend a distance of 40-60 wavelengths above the tree tops, which at cellular frequencies, translates to 40-60 feet Your proposed antenna height is a little less than this, but represents a good compromise which you can live with, even though your signals may not be optimum. The only other radio propagation consideration is the use of microwave frequencies and antennas. Microwave signals can be totally blocked by leaves and other vegetable matter. Even though the beam from the microwave antenna is relatively srnatl, it must be totally unobstructed in the vicinity of the antenna and also on a line to the antenna at the other end of the path. For these reasons, it is our recommendation as your consulting engineers, that the height which you proposed at 12 O'clock Knob is the bwest practicable height you should empby. If the antenna height is any lower, the signals will start degrading, eventually reaching the point where they are now. Avery undesirable situation. It is my understanding that you have approached the FAA and received approval from them regarding your proposed tower and antenna heights at 12 O'clock Knob_ You should be assured that when issuing authorization for a tower, the FAA carefully considers all factors regarding safety of flight. The FAA has an entire division which does nothing but air space clearances for tower erection. All of the 99,E ~' Mr. Scott Bashavn August 26, 1991 Page 2 instrument approach procedures and VFR procedures in arnd around nearby airports are taken nto consicSeration in the FAA decision. I am a cornmeresal pilot and instrument rated and am very much concerned with safety 'sues retested to FAA decisions regarding towers. When the FAA says there wi be no hazard to navigation, you can rest assured that there will be no hazard. E an airplane is low enough across those mountains to come within 114 feet of the ground, it has very serious problems. in fact, its problems would be so serious that it would ra~ety be crashing into trees which would be located some 20-25 feet bebw the he+~ght of your antenna. FAA regulations prohibit such operations of aircraft at low ai~itudes except in an emergency. The local airpoR manager and/or airport authority has had an opportunity to relate their fears and desires to the FAA in this procedure. While it is the job of the local airport manage.' to support the pilots and aircraft using their airport, the proper form for carrying on such a fight would be at the FAA, and not at the Local zoning level. The reason that the FAA regulates towers, is to provide a uniform code for the entire Country. ff a zoning board or airport authority arbitraniy assigns different standards at their airport, there might be some risk that their standards ccutd be in violation of Fede{at statutes. We would require a record of the a~w~g proeedings and a transcript or other written material to proceed further in ttars matter. If we may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to Let us know. AKP:pjl BTAFF RBPOR? ~~~ CABB STOKBERt 4-Z/91 REVIEWED BYs ANITA MCMILL!-N 'BTITIONERt CBLLOLAR ONE DATBt FBBROARY S, 1991 Petition of Scott Basham, Cellular One, for a "Use Not Provided for Permit" to construct a 120 foot communication tower, located off of Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Road 694), Catawba Magisterial District. ~1ATOR8 OF RBQOEBT a. Petitioner has applied for a "Use Not Provided for Fermit" to construct a 120 foot self-supporting communication tower with 14 foot base. The size of the property is 31 acre tract. The disturbed area will be 400 square feet. Petitioner currently has a 240 square foot one-story equipment shelter and three existing utility poles with whip antennae on this site. b. Petitioner has proffer as a condition that the tower will not exceed 120 feet. The three existing utility poles will be removed. The existing access road, equipment shelter, fence and appurtenances will remain. No water or sewer is needed for this installation and the existing electric service will be unaffected. c. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project in more detail. APPLIC!-BLE REGOLP-TZONS 3. The tower would need to comply with airport and FAA restrictions on height and radio transmission, if located in an approach zone. b. FAA approval is necessary before a building permit will be issued. c. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Section 21-102-5 states that an application fora "Use Not Provided For Permit" may be made to the County "if, in any district, a use is not specifically permitted N . . . d. Building plans must be submitted and certified by a Virginia registered professional engineer. e. Site plan review and approval will be required, prior to building permit issuance, to ensure compliance with all County requirements. BITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGR!-PHYt The area is severely sloping upwards towards the proposed tower site. The proposed tower will be built on the highest elevation of the site which is 2,300 feet. GROOND COVERS Some of the area is heavily wooded with mature tree cover such as pine and oak. The existing built area and the proposed site for the tower is clear and covered with gravel. ~A CHARACTERISTIC8 FOTORB GRORTH PRIORITYs Situated within the Glenvar Community Planning Area. This area is designated for rural preserve. The Rural Preserve designation delineates outlying areas which are primarily undeveloped and stable. ~' z GENERAL AREAL Undeveloped wooded area with mature landscaping. There is ~ substantial distance between the existing residential area and the proposed site. IJ1KD OBE IMPACT ASBE88MBNT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 s positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 aanageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. IN FACTOR COMMENTB LAND OSE COMPATIBILITY 3 C0MPREHENBIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. Communication tower uses are of moderate compatibility fn this category. 3 SORROONDING LAND: Wooded area with matured pine and oak trees. An existing locked pipe gate is across the access road as it enters Twelve O'clock Knob Road. 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Very low density single-family residential development, generally averaging one unit per five to ten net acres. An existing Valley Communication tower is approximately 100 feet away and a Contel communication tower is located a few miles away iron the proposed site. The question of possible health threat posed by the microwaves used to transmit a cellular communications should be taken into consideration. According to Eugene Rosenberg, a cellular communications consultant, the amount of microwave radiation produced by cellular communication should not be underestiaated (Zoning Kews Report, January 1991, p. 2). 2 SITE LAYOOT: Petitioner proposes to build a 120 foot self-supporting communication tower. The disturbed area will be 400 square feet. ARCHITECTOREi N/A 3 BCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Zoning Ordinance. will be required per Roanoke County AMENITIES: N/A 3 NATORAL FEATURESs The site is well screened by a natural buffer of mature trees. On the other hand, the tower elevation in relation to existing residential area of Twelve O'clock Knob Road could create a visual disturbance. STREET CAPACITIES: N/A CIRCOLATIONi N/A OTILITI88 wATERi N/A BSWER: N/A 3 ~~/-~3 HABINi N/A FLOODPLAIN: N/A PIIBLIC BBRVIC88 2 FIRE PROTBCTION: Within established service standard. 2 REBCOBs Within established service standard. PAR1C8 AND RECREATION: N/A BCHOOLB: N/A TAZ BA88 LAND AND IMPROVE2~NT VALQB: N/A TAZABLB aR088 BALES/YEAR: N/A TOTAL EMPLOYEES: N/A TOTAL REVENIIB TO THB COQNTY/YEAR: N/A EN9IRONMENT AIR: N/A WATBR: N/A BOILB s N/A NOIBB: N/A BIGNAGBi N/A PLAN CONSISTBNCY This area is designated as rural preserve. ~TAFY BVALOATION BTRSNGTHBs (1) The site and the proposed tower will be located in a substantial distance from residential area. (2) There is a locked pipe gate across the access road to the proposed site as it enters Twelve O'Clock Rnob. 1rEA1CNE88ESt (1) Petitioner has yet to receive FAA approval to build a 120 foot structure. (2) The Roanoke Regional Airport Executive Director has yet to review this proposal. (3) In addition to aesthetic concerns, the question of possible health hazard mentioned above, should be taken into consideration. QROFF8R8 BQGGBSTBDs Structure height limited to 120 feet including all appurtenances and lighting above. ~~ September 5, 1991 Ms. Anita McMillan Department of Planning and Zoning Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Proposed Cellular One Tower Twelve O'Clock Knob Dear Ms. McMillan In consideration of approval of the requested "Use Not Provided For" Permit to construct a self-supporting communications tower on the existing Cellular One cell site on Tax Parcel 66.00-1-21, I proffer that the total height shall not exceed 114 feet as determined by the FAA to present no hazard to air navigation. Sincerely, Sherri 1 Smith cc: Scott Basham, Cellular One Carolyn Bolton, Balzer & Associates, Inc. , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ;~ ~ ! ' sANUAnr tit AQAERICAN /' -IANNINO ASSOCIATION Siting Ceilutar 'IYansmitters Cellular tekpfiones have become an important method of communicatiam since they were introduced in the early 1980s. They have become so widely uud that nearly 600 cellular comrsJuaications networks have been established nationwide-a dramatic increase over the 32 systems in place only six ~~ean ago. Some inside the industry expect that within 10 yci-"s one-fifth of all telephone communications will be traasr~:ircd via cellular units. As the devices become more popular. the antennas that broadcast their transmissions arc becoming ~cornmon features on the landscape of America's cites and suburbs. And, like any new land use, these antcr•~¢ present problems that must be addressed in local zoning codes. cellulu ce+:r.:nunication systems operate through a network of 'cxl sites." Each cell site has two principal componcnu, s 12-by-28-foot structure for radio and computer e~u:.gment and a broadcast antenna. The antenna may sit uop ~ existing tall structure, such as an office tower ~- ~ traditioaa<I steel lattice communications tower. or may be ~•estandin~ pole ranging from 60 to ISO feet in height. As .... density of users increases within a cellular system, more cell situ must bt established to keep pace with the demand. Local zoning modes have only begun to address the question of how to n:g-nlate these facilities. The issues center around aesthetics grid compatibility with existing land uses. Further complicating astters is a growing concern that microwave emissions from these facilities may pose a risk to public health. ~~ .,.../ . excluding those used '" ~ exclusively for dispatch communications." Another approach is a system of administrative review prior to approval of a new cell site. Cincinnati established seven criteria to protect residential districts from being overrun by cellulu facilities while - _ ' _ allowing for the network's _= =~' ~ ~ orderly growth and - , - development. . - - "~ ~ - yt ^ No new cell may be - - - established if there is a - technically suitable span available on an existing communications tower . _ within the geographic area that the new cell site is to serve. Labels and Categories One difficulty with cellular telephone transmission towers lies in definir$ them. In many communities, cell sites are classified u "public utility distribution systems" or as "public uti!it) stations." Many zoning codes allow these uses by right in aiL-post every zone and allow them to be established w ~:'sout any public hearing. In contrast, radio or television tow e7s are often not permitted in residential and other tones vr~ere aesthetics is a primary concern. Because the demand fir cellular communications facilities has grown so rapidly arse shows no signs of abating soon, communities should draft specific regulations that address their land-use impacts. One commoa approach to regulating all sites is to include them a existing regulations for radio and television towns. >'+emsacala, Florida. took this approach when it was faced with the introduction of a cellular system. The city •ertded t3te inning code by expanding its definition of a ;rtter~c-ial eoatmunications tower. "a structure situated on a nonresidtntiad site that is intended for transmitting or receiving ram, television, or telephone communications, ^ A11 structures must meet minimum setback requirements in their district as specified by the zoning code. ^ The entire facility must be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with its environment. ~..: ^ Fencing must be provided -~ to secure the site. No barbed wire or razor win: r, ~ fencing is to be permitted _ in residential districts. Monopole antennas, likt this one on Chicago's North Side, art prolijcrating along with the cellalar telephones rhty strut. ^ Vegetative buffering mug be provided to separate the facility from adjaceen land usa. ^ The facility's owner must file an annual report wits the building inspector's office detailing how the facility is continuing to conform to the above standards. ^ All obsolete or unused facilities must be removed within 12 months of cessation of operations at the site. In addition, rnmmunication towers were eliminated as art as-of-right use in low-density residential zones. As a result, all towers proposed for a residential dasarict now require a conditional use hearing. An exception is made for monopole rs. The intent of this policy is to tacourage their use . -ruse they are less visually obwsive than steel lattice towers or rooftop installations. Public Nealth Issues ~In addition to aesthetic concems, some communities have addressed the question of a possible beahh threat posed by the microwave used to transmit cellular communications. Eugene Rosenberg, a cellular communications consultant in Milwaukee. says the amount of microvrave radiation produced by cellular communications should not be undercstimated.l/ The telephones themselves, notes Rosenberg, emit between three and five watts of power as around 824 megahertz. This radiation has both tbera~al and nonthermal effects. To illustrate the heating effect. Rosenberg says that this power is enough to begin to coot a bet dog in about 1 S minutes. By comparison, the transmissitcxr towers typically operate at 75 watts, but can emit appreciably more power in larger, rural service areas. The nonthermal effects of microwave radiation are less understood. As part of a growing concenn about the effect of nonionizing radiation on humans, radiation associated with cellular communications has become suspect. APA's research department has received numerous questions from planners about this concern over the lase tight to 10 months. Cell sites, as well as all other electromagnetic radiators, aze •-atoning to become the next big NIMBY issue. t is not within the scope of this article to discuss and uses the health hazazd of nonionizing radiation. Table 1 is included to give an indication of whu some of the effects might be at varying rates of exposure. tiote that, generally, cell sites have been measured to emit less than any amount of radiation that unequivocally will caose i11 effects. Although the federal government has not issued any regulations concerning the nonthermal effects of radiation exposure for the public at large, some bcal governments have addressed the subject. The following regulations aze ~i offered u examples of standards in piattx. Oldham County, Kentucky, hu incorporated standards for communications facilities that regulate the amount of non- , ionizing electromagnetic radiation that may be emitted. The Table 1. Summary of Effects of Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure (mW/cm~ Effects 100 Threshold of cataract formation 28 Teratogenic (tumor{ausing) effects 10 Molecular, genetic eSects (thermal) 4 Threshold for neuro endocrine effete 0.05 Decreased sperm ~ 0.03 Increased brain amine levels 0.01 Altered brain permeability Source; Mme. Aden, "Tissue Interactions ~itf Noeiosn~~ E]ectromsanetic Folds; 14a2. county's zoning code requires ttut the general public not be exposed to ambient radiation eiceeding a power density d 0.2 milliwatts per square arrtimeter. PAS Report Numbs ~t~/ 384 (1984), Rt-gulating Rafiio and lY ToM~ers, offers a mode ordinance based on land-use controls in place in Multnomah County, Oregon. That ordinance recommended that the type of antenna used for cellulu communications should be u least six feet from the surface o(any habitable structure and that its highest point be at lean 1S feu from the nearest exterior surface. The ordinance includes comprehensive provisions for regulating all types of communications facilities. An agency considering any sort of comprehensive approach to broadcast towers a with an eye toward establishing performance standards for uses emitting nonionizing radiation should uamine that report. DB. Loudoun County Developers to Pay for Roads Loudoun County, Virginia, is considering a plan this month that would require developers to pay for rural road improvements. The tees wou"d be used to increase a road's carrying capacity to accommodate any proposed project. Developed with the assistancx of land-use consultant t.ane Kendig, the Fair Share Rural Road Improvement Policy resulted from recent concerns about rural road safety and the preservation of agricultural lands. According to Karen Gavrilovic, principal plannu for the county, the measure has a "SO-SO chance" of passage by the planning commission this month, but would not actual}y be implemented for at least a year if approved. The plan encourages the building of subdivisions near towns where adequate facilities such u roads already exist. County officials hope that dcrelopers will opt to build on parcels where a road already has the rtetded carrying capacity. As a result, agricuburc in Loudoun County should continue without disturbances from residential development. Rural road safety, however, is the plan's most important consideration. Currently, half of the county's local roads are unpaved, and the zoning ordinance allows for nearly three times more development thaw the rural roads can safely handle. Many consist of just one 12-foot-wide lane, making two-way traffic extremely dangerous. One county board member has called western Loudoun County "the killing fields" because of its recent increase of traffic deaths. Although the area's A-3 zoning district permits a maximum density of one house per three acres. the roads can only absorb the traffic generated from a density of one house per six to 10 acres. As an alternuive to downzoning, the fau- share policy would let land be developed to its full potential. The fair-share method world entail a detailed evaluation of the current road situation in Loudoun County. Variables such as lane width, availabie passing distance, presence d obstructions, pavement type, and temin will be used in determining a road's carrying capacity. In addition. the county and the Virginia Department o[ Transportation would designate appropriate levels d service (which range from no congestion [level Aj to total congestion [level F]) for each road type. For example, rural arterials could be designated u Z ,• .- j y ~1~~ ~ _ ,q( ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.~' Jt~:~s ~ .%i _ = Para ~~ _- ~.N /d of :?/{-!i/'~~'' 1. _VVV ~ •r~ ~~~ _ • e- ` .~ s : • `' ~ . '~''.,, ~:. /• '~ , ~ ~ ~ sir w - '' ~~ ~ .. ~~ ~/ %/% qZ~ •- ,~i .~~~ -~ '1111 ', ^ ~ ' )~ ~ - =.J_ /~`Sl:-_/ ~~~ •V '~ n, ~`` /sue. ~ ~ r - -'!• ~. ~.1 • ~-` " ~-i j•.~~F~', ^ !~ ~„~.'~~~.1~v / ~/~ _ :~.~ _ ~~^_ --- ~/rte. i 1 Ate' ~ a yr r~ _~~~ _ _ ~~~~~~ .^~ ,^~~1 ~ ... ;~\ ~ . ~~ % y~~~ , ~~-- ' _ -~~_. nu~ ~~! I '~r~ - _^< ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~- ~~ : 1~ ` ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ =! L \,, ,~ li ,.~' .. ~_ ,:t ~ ` Vii.' 3: ir.' M ~. ~ ~~ r ~~ ~~ ~ .L ~ ~ 1,p ~ ~. ' t.. ,ct ~--- r x >r O O ' J~~~ i 1 t i I h~4~ ~ ~~ I `__J r~ l_ - J ->~ ~ k- Z ~ V Q ti b 0 0 N 1 .l~ 1 I ~~3~ e0 WW c ~o .~ ~~~ ~ ~~ i~ ~~ ~ 8 Q~ ~ ,~ ~;~ti '' .jam z r/ ~~~~ I / ~,,, S 1 ~ a x X h~ ~~ ~~ ~~ x ~~ eo ~~ _i W~ h b ~ °c 0 h , ~ ~ ~ ~p N1 M d i ~~ ~~ o~~; 4~~~ ooa~ ~F~~ W ~` b ~ ch~~` -- , ~~~ Q• y~! V ~I~I ~ °aO~ OHyH O i~ O ~Q~~a.7~0 U ~ ~Nj,.~H ~O H{x Q ~UNWENa+ ° ~~~m~ °u v z~O ~ .~ ~ k: O ~ ~ ~ " G O 0. O ~ ~ O h ~a a w~ off °° o ~- ° ' _ ; , W r ~~ ~ ~~ z ~ c fL C W~ w> : ~ z c~ ~ z e v W y U H o i ~ U v ! Q ~~ j ~ ' Z 3E ~~i. ~ ~ 5 /:3 9/~'/~.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ERECT A SELF-SUPPORTING COMMUNICATION TOWER LOCATED OFF TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB ROAD IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF CELLIILAR ONE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 22, 1991 and the second reading and public hearing was held September 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 3, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing 31 acres, as described herein, and located at off Twelve O'Clock Knob Road, (Tax Map Number 66.00-1-12.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Cellular one. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 694, also known as Twelve O'Clock Knob Road, on the line of the property now owned by Peggy L. Moulse and on the line of the Julia C. Powell property; thence leaving said point of beginning and following a line between said property owners S. 42° 57' W. 180.58 feet to an old pipe; thence continuing between said properties, N. 87° 48' 15" W. 449.41 feet to a point; thence S. 64° 41' 45" W. 236.79 feet to a point; thence continuing between said properties, S. 84° 41' 99~~ 45" W. 462.00 feet to an old iron on top of the mountain; thence along the top of the mountain with a line between the June M. Manoogian property and the property herein described, N. 5° 00' W. 561 feet to a point; thence continuing with same, N. 17° 30' W. 561 feet to a point, corner to the John R. Goodman property; thence with the Goodman property, then the Charles E. Johnston property and the property herein described, N. 40° 30' E. 500 feet to a point; thence with the division line between Tracts #1 and #2, N. 87° 25' 50" E. 405.15 feet to a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 694; thence with a new division line following the center of Route 694 and dividing Tract #1 of the Peggy L. Moulse property and with the following courses, S. 50° 08' 25" W. 41.80 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 143.42 feet and whose radius is 80.06 feet (chord equals S. 1° 10' 47" E. 124.99 feet) to a point; thence S. 52° 30' E. 63.06 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right whose arc is 263.82 feet and whose radius is 197.27 feet (chord equals S. 14° 11' 12" E. 244.60 feet) to a point; thence continuing with the center of the road, S. 24° 09' W. 121.14 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 98.88 feet and whose radius is 269.87 feet (chord equals S. 13° 37' 47" W. 98.33 feet) to a point; thence S. 3° 08' W. 41.22 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 92.79 feet and whose radius is 100.47 feet (chord equals S. 23° 19' 25" E. 89.53 feet) to a point; thence S. 49° 46' 50" E. 42.66 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right whose arc is 96.74 feet and whose radius is 155.07 feet (chord equals S. 31° 54' 32" E. 95.18 feet) to a point; thence S. 14° 02' 15" E. 63.87 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 354.79 feet and whose radius is 308.10 feet (chord equals S. 47° 01' 37" E. 335.51 feet) to a point; thence S. 80° O1' E. 87.14 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 72.25 feet and whose radius is 89.66 feet (chord equals S. 55° 58' 30" E. 73.06 feet) to a point; thence continuing with the center line of Route 694, S. 31° 56' E. 28.74 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing approximately 31 acres and being as shown on map titled Partial Survey for G. Hampton Moulse dated March 31, 1983, Revised February 8, 1984, by T. P. ~~ Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. 4. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. That the total height of shall not exceed 114 feet as determined by the FAA to present no hazard to air navigation. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\cellular.one ' 1 ..} AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE 92491-12 VACATING A 20-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 21 AND 22, VISTA FOREST SUBDIVISION (PB 10, PAGE 158), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Engineering Staff has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot drainage easement located on Lots 22 and 22 in the Vista Forest Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 10, at page 158 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot drainage easement located on Lots 21 and 22 in the Vista Forest Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 10, at page 158, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Roanoke County shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # I TSM NUMBER ~'° '7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: To vacate the 20' Drainage Easement recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 158, located on lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest Subdivision, situated in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Petitioner, Roanoke County Engineering Staff, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate the 20 foot Drainage Easement by Ordinance, in order to remove the encumbrance on lots 21 and 22. BACKGROUND Roanoke County Engineering approximately 250 feet of a 20 lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest development of lot 21, the eliminating the need for the attached map). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff request involves vacating Eoot Drainage Easement located on Subdivision because during the topography was altered thus described easement {Refer to Roanoke County staff is requesting that the described Drainage Easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-4$2(b}, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. d ~. First reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for September 24, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT• None STAFF RECOMMENDATION County Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the 20 foot Drainage Easement and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary Ordinance. S ITTED BY: APPROVED HY: Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe tions County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( } Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( } Received ( } Referred To pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 %. K ~~ ;~ 0 p Q ~ G \\\T~ 2~~ ~ ~~~b ~~~~ ~e s Ae~o 1 Op~ oOQ'~ 'ZO ~ ~ dhh~ o i „~ ~ ~~~ QD ~tio~~ 6h' 23 aka tih~~'\ ZI ~ a 22 s o ~ _ EXtS~ZO' ~ ~' o ~ ~°~ ExisT,n.&.ro ti oaAINACe .~ ~, ~~o, ~~ ~ REMAJN ~, EASEMENT ~ m y y~ FOR EXf~T, SWALf ~ ~ TD ~E VAGATEn \ - - ~, ACa04e5 60Tti Z- ~jI\QI ~~ ~...~ .. FOREST e(5o ~` ~ ~ 9B J~y~ P EXIST, ZO,X ~~~J N59•~3, ~~ ~ ~ _ ZO'nRA1HAl~E ~6~1' \ EASEMENT 70 ~?EMAIN ~a/~" VE ri iRVF noTo CURVE .ANGLE RADIUS ARC TAN CHORD CH. BEARING "A" 54°34'03" 105.00' 100.00' 54.16' 96.26' S 86°30'17" E "B" 42°11'15" 245.00' 180.40` 94.51' 176.35' S 80°18'53" E "C" 75°55'16" 25.00' 33.13' 19.50' 30.76' S 63°26'52" E "D" 10°16'22" 676.55' 121.30' 60.81' 121.14' S 30°37'25" E ~~: NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE.EI:OOD INSUR- ANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIPIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. LO:~'. PLAT SHOWING 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED BY noANUKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS „ s(,Ty 0~ ~+~ SITUATED ON LOTS 21 & 22, ~ ` VISTA FOREST (P.B. 10, PAGE 158) } p 5_11_.11 rpC WINDSOR FiILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT B. LEE '~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HENDERSON JR.~ SCALE: 1-- = loo' DATE: 19 AUGUST 1991 , ~. A'~'~- q,. (UCENSQ Na l~ LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. O¢ ~ ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ~ 3UR`1 '~ ROANOK6, VIRGINIA x1~.~.16 v ~ M~ ~tl~~t ...q~.....a..R COMM. JJ' BE' ~i34 3 • ~ i ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE VACATING A 20-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 21 AND 22, VISTA FOREST SUBDIVISION (PB 10, PAGE 158), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Engineering Staff has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot drainage easement located on Lots 22 and 22 in the Vista Forest Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 10, at page 158 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot drainage easement located on Lots 21 and 22 in the Vista Forest Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 10, at page 158, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts ~~~. of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Roanoke County shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. c:\wp51 \agenda\vacation\vista ~~~', AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE 92491-13 VACATING A 20-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON TRACT 1D, VALLEYPOINTE (PB 11, PAGE 46), HOLLIN3 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Lingerfelt Development Corporation, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot water easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 11 at page 46 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, in the Hollins Magisterial District, of record in Plat Book 11 at page 46 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Lingerfelt Development Corporation shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by Lingerfelt Development Corporation, their heirs, successors, or assigns. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~`+~+' AT A R$GULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MESTiNG DATE: September 24, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: To vacate the 20 foot Water Line Easement recorded in Plat Book II, Page 46, located on Tract 1D, situated in the Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- The Petitioner, Lingerfelt Development Corporation, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate the 20 foot Water Line Easement by Ordinance, in order to remove the encumbrance on Tract 1D {refer to the attached map). BACKGROUND- During the first development phase of Valleypointe the 20 foot waterline easement was established in order to provide temporary water service to building A & B while the development plans for Valleypointe were being revised. Now since the road and utility plans for Valleypointe, Phase I have been finalized and all water and sewer construction has been completed the need for the referenced easement has been eliminated. (Refer to attached map) ,• ~~ c SUMriARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County staff is requesting that the described Water Line Easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(ba, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The Roanoke County staff has no objections to the. vacating of the 20 foot Water Line Easement. First reading of the Proposed Ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for September 24, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT- None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Hoard of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the 20 foot Water Line Easement and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary Ordinance. MITTED BY: APPROVED HY: Arnold Covey, Directo of Elmer C. Hodge Engineering & Inspections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( } Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Hoard 2 '\ ~ ~ ` ` ~ Y 1 Q ~ ~ ~~•r \tOh'Ph~\ ~~ Q a q ~~~ ~ ~~ Qp \~ ~~ P ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~~. u Q \~ J~~U ~~ S y o - i Q ~' 31~OQ' 1 M N'36°~~ y1 331.00 y1" ~ ~h36°~~' pg11PG.~~~) ~a1A'~ `3101. a ~ ~ I pRrVaTE 85' AGGE55 a~ ~ t°.~ N N i (1TIGfTY EASEMENT - - ~ },---i ~i /Z - i~i 7 ' ~ N55'0o'00"E-- ' v - ~~ 3 0 ~ o° M N~ ti ~ ~ v ~ `~` f_ 17RACt 3A i 1 350.56' s ~- -.~ t7RAINAGE EA56MBNT (P,P~ r7 PG. 33) y 50'AGGE54 EASEMENT (PB.12 PG. 33) I c ~~ ~I ~, TRAG7 117 3.s(3 ACaES M m Ar ~ I', 9 a3 A4 ; -:-; --- ------, ~~1~ E~0'WATER l,1NE EASEMENT Ah ~+ Al A7 (1:8.11 PG.46) TO t3E VAGA7E0 ~3V TuE °~ ~; ROANONE COUNTY gOQap OF SUPERVf40A5 I ~ II e- U o 3 ~` ~O Q ~ v `~ p o ~ M uc~ W ~•~ I cq ,v °~ i .~; s s ~ o m1 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT Al-A2 N55°16' 25"W 21.03' CH. A2-A3 N52°45' 01"E 71.33' A3-A4 N32°21' 47"E 42.22' A4-M N54°50' 48"E 253.97' M-A5 S53°15' 03"E 21.04' A5-A6 S54°50' 48"W 256.53' A6-A7 S32°21' 47"W 41.84' A7-A1 S52°45' 01"W 68.42' r \o TRacr r8 (Pr3.rrPG,46) T4x "`3207-! - 14.1 - 15'1'UfiGlc uT1LrtV EASEMENT (P. F}, 12 PG,33, _^t7RA/NAGE EAb~MENl (P 8.12 PG, 33) .00' -__-- __ _ -. ~ vac t, E Yr'~,g a K 4 "c-, •, TRACT I ~ Z (pr3. I3 PG, Z9) I~aIVE 5o'al~' CURVE ANGLE RADIUS ARC TAN CHORD CH. BEARING C-1 14°05'45" 611.62' 150.47' 75.62' 150.09' S 64°34'11" W C-2 18°52'03" 661.62' 217.87' 109.93' 216.89' N 62°11'02" E C-3 90°00'00" 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' S 82°14'59" E C-4 02°23'00" 1457.40' 60.62' 30.32' 60.62' S 38°26'29" E C-5 06°09'16" 1407.40' 151.17' 75.66' 151.10' S 42°42'37" E PLAT SHOWING ZO' WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING VACATED BY ROANOKE COUNTY 90ARD OF SUPERVISORS O}~~p,LTFI p~,`r~ SITUATED ACROSS TRACT 1D (P.B. 12, PAGE 33) HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~ (,~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA B. LEE ~ SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: 1H JULY 1991 HENDE}3SON, R.> (LICENSE N0. LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. 1,4SO ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ~¢ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~~ 9URV~ W. ~ COMM. #8?. 5 25 - ¢ 3 ~qi- .~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 ORDINANCE VACATING A 20-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON TRACT 1D, VALLEYPOINTE (PB 11, PAGE 46), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Lingerfelt Development Corporation, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot water easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 11 at page 46 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 10, 1991; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, in the Hollins Magisterial District, of record in Plat Book 11 at page 46 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Lingerfelt Development Corporation shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by Lingerfelt Development Corporation, their heirs, successors, or assigns. c:\wp51\agenda\vacation\valleypo I J` ! ? Y d s r -. .3 "! 9/12/91 Anne Marie, I called Susan Wood (the other coach) and got the information from her. The name of the team is the VINTON SLUGGERS - PONYTAIL DIVISION. The names of the girls on the team are: TAMASA ADAMS WENDY BELCHER LAURIE BOWMAN ERIN CALDWELL CABBIE DOUPNIK MELISSA FALLS KELLY HILLIGSBERG LEAH LEAVENS HEATHER RING MICHELLE ROYAL AMY RUMBLEY JODI STUCKEY TIFFANY TAMULONIS They won the VIRGINIA STATE CHAMPIONSHIP and they placed 5th in the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP. They would like to be presented at the 7:00 PM portion of the meeting and the girls will be there. The girls will also be wearing their Virginia State Championship shirts. I told her if they had any questions or changes to call me. MWR O~ ROANp~~ . p Z ~ 'a /x~ 150 1 V YEAflS 8$ SFS6?UICENTENN\P~' A Beauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Cecil Hill Rt. 8, Box 161 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Hill: September 25, 1991 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL D45TRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGSSTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLWS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for a two-year term. Your term will expire on September 27, 1993. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources ALLdMfRICA CITY ~~~~~ ~~ ~u ~t~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 ~ ROANpK O~F ~ •~ z A J 2 :. b ~18 150 $$ rengs S~SQ1/1CENTENNIP~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE September 25, 1991 Mrs. James A. (Chris) Pickard 5460 Stoneybrook Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs. Pickard: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWEl11 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on September 24, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a alternate member of the Community Corrections Resources Board for a one-year term. Your term will expire August 13, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~~~y2- - "`C<J Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Phipps, VASAP /~. ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i L'AMERICA~Tj .\`J~ ~~I,, ~ nor .r 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 OF ROANp~~ ~ •~ ~ ~ J "b 18 (E50 1988 CSQUICENTENNIP A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mrs. Carole Popik 6486 Fairway View Trail Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs. Popik: September 26, 1991 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN cATAwEIA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CFWRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 12, 1991. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYNOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ~, AIL~AMERICII GTY C~~~n~ ~~ ~~r~Yt~~~ 'I I' I I 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2004 O~ FlOANp~~ ~ •~ ~ , aZ 18^ E501 1J88 cS~U1CENTENN~p ~l Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE September 26, 1991 Sergeant Deborah C. Foley 108 Cambridge Square Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Sergeant Foley: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN CATAWE3A MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WIN060R HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on December 4, 1991. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, G- Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~~~~~ ~~ ~. ALiAMERICA~TY ~~~~~~~ ~ I I 1979 1989 O~ ROANp~.~ ~ •~ z A ~. '~ a 1$ E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN\p~ A Beauti fulBeginninQ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Dr, Robert L Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 1501 Washington Street Vinton, VA 24179 September 25, 1991 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW, CHAIRMAN CATAWElA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WIND50R HILLS MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL D45TRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Dr. Wayne: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, !would like to thank you for attending the meeting on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. Sincerely, .6~t .. /~~r~~~~ ~~ ~~~ iIIAMERICA~Ti •/\~J'• III, ~~~~ 1979 1989 Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Lee Eddy FROM Elmer Hodge County Administrator DATE: September 20, 1991 SUBJECT: DARE Program Please be assured that there will be no reduction in the staffing of the DARE Program. There may be a short period of time when we will have to stretch the available resources because one of the DARE officers has resigned to take a position with the State Police. Chief Cease and I are aware of the Board's priority for this program. If necessary, we will reassign other office staff to fill the position. Since the County was not able to give salary increases and because we are trying to eliminate 20 positions, there will be turnover. However, we are committed to providing the services in public safety established by the Board as a priority. This vacancy is already under review by Chief Cease and the Public Safety Team and they may be able to resolve the problem through reassignment of existing personnel. You are correct that other localities fund at least a portion of the DARE Program from the school budget while we do not. If would be very helpful to have the use of some of the grant funds recently awarded to the school system for substance abuse. CC: Members of the Board of Supervisors Dr. Bayes Wilson Chief John Cease MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors FROM Elmer C. Hodge DATE: September 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Report of Low-Flow Toilets At the June 25, 1991 meeting, the Board requested that staff do a limited study of low-flow toilets. Staff has now completed the study. Water conservation type water closets have been required in the BOCA National Plumbing Code (Section 1219.1 and 1503.8) since 1981, and all new construction meets these requirements. Any homes that have been remodeled since 1981 also must meet the same requirement. It is difficult, however, to determine how many low flow toilets have been installed as a result of remodeling. Using manufacturer's literature, based on an average household, there is a potential savings to the citizen of $1.12 per month per household if low flow toilets are installed in older structures. However, the estimated cost to replace these toilets is $150 to $300 per unit including purchase and plumbing costs. The savings to the County are difficult to estimate. If 15,000 households convert, the water consumption might be reduced by as much as 400,000 gallons per day. There are several problems associated with converting all units to low flow toilets. They are: (1) additional costs to the homeowner for conversion; and (2) how to mandate conversion. The Board also requested information of the possible reuse of residential wastewater. Both the BOCA Plumbing Code (Section P-1201.1) and Virginia Health Department Regulations prohibit the reuse of residential wastewater. At this time, I would recommend no further action. Conservation will continue to take place through enforcement of the BOCA code. F of ~~ ~ ~; - G Z A J :r 2 'a SFS~)UICENTENN~p~ ~l BeaurifulBeginning PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE ~o~t~t~ a~ ~a~~a~e MEMORANDUM DATE: September 23, 1991 TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: Anne Marie Green, Public Information Officer RE: Citizens and Governm?nt At the meeting of September 10, I was asked to review Supervisor Eddy's memorandum on citizen involvement, and to provide an analysis of the suggestions. Mr. Eddy is correct - most people are interested only in actions that directly affect them, their families or their property. Additionally, our recent survey showed that the vast majority of County residents are satisfied with the actions of the Board and the staff, which means that few people see a need to become involved. I have the following comments on his suggestions: 1. Mary Allen is going to change the automated message for the Board of Supervisors' telephone number, and will include information on the public hearings and pending actions of general interest. 2. A display ad in the Roanoke Times and World News is expensive, and I believe we can achieve the same effect with the list of recent and upcoming Board actions in Roanoke County Today. On the response cards which we recently received, many citizens indicated that they like this feature of the newsletter and read it regularly. 3. I will contact Norma Jean Peters, who oversees the Social Studies curriculum for the County schools, and remind her that the 1 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2010 Supervisors and staff are always available for appearances at the schools. Classroom visits should start below the junior and senior high school level. Last school year, a student at Radford University arranged visits of this type as part of a course project. The Sheriff, the County Administrator, the Animal Control Officer and Dick Robers each spoke to students at Cave Spring Elementary School, and their visits were very well received. Additionally, Student Government Day continues to be popular with the schools, and our program is one of the oldest in the Country. 4. Mr. Hodge has started meeting with civic league presidents on a quarterly basis, and at the next meeting, we will remind them that the Supervisors and staff are always available for speaking engagements. 5. If the Board wishes, I can explore interview programs with local TV and radio stations. I will need to know who is available to be interviewed and the topics you would be willing to speak about. The stations do occasionally contact Mr. Hodge and other staff members for interviews, and we do everything possible to accommodate the requests. 6. Once the government access channels become available, the County will have the opportunity to use Cable TV regularly. I am a representative to the Cable TV Committee, and the first meeting is this week. I will report back as to the possibility of televised Board meetings, interviews, etc. 7. We can make copies of controversial or important agenda items to be placed on the back table along with copies of the agenda itself. Obviously, there is a cost to this, but if the Board wishes, it can be done on an experimental basis. Currently, a variety of civic leagues, citizens and news media agencies receive a copy of the agenda in the mail prior to the meetings. They send us a written request at the beginning of the year, and the clerk's office mails the agenda to them. Staff frequently receive calls from the press asking for more information on certain items after they receive the agenda, and we generally fax them the Board Reports. The press also has the media packet available to them beginning at 3:00 p.m. on Friday before the meeting, as well as during the meeting itself, and some of the reporters do come into the office to review the agenda. 8. The County could advertise vacancies on committees, commissions and boards. This does require application forms, however, and then the individual Board member would have to choose who to recommend. 2 9. The local media has been enduring budget cuts, and they are finding it difficult to cover everything in the Roanoke Valley. Press conferences should be kept for important issues and events, and I believe we will receive better coverage that way. We do send press releases to all the news media on a regular basis, and also receives periodic telephone calls from them asking for "news". As a member of the Virginia Municipal League's Public Affairs Network and the National Association of County Public Information Officers, I regularly receive newsletters containing suggestions on communicating with citizens. Many of these have associated costs, but I will watch for any which we can do inexpensively. cc: Elmer Hodge County Administrator 3 MEMO - 9/4/91 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy ~~- Subject: Citizens and Government As mentioned at a recent Board meeting, I am very interested in exploring what can be done to improve citizen involvement in Roanoke County's government. There appears to be a general lack interest and information on the part of most residents regarding the ongoing activities of County government. In my experience, a significant number of citizens become interested only in cases of controversial zoning changes, proposed pet control ordinances, changes in youth athletic programs, or a substantial increase in taxes or service fees. There are many other actions that should of interest and concern to citizens. I have attempted to address this problem through the Windsor Hills District REPORTER (the feedback to date has been positive>, but that newsletter has a circulation of only 150. of be This concern of mine is not related to partisan politics, but rather is a perceived need for more public interest and involvement. Some initial specific suggestions for addressing this need are as follows: ~... 1. Change the automated message for the Board of Supervisors' telephone number (772-8949) each Friday before a Board meeting to include information on all public hearings and other pending action of general interest. 2. Run a display ad in the RTWN on the Monday before each Board meeting, with information on pending public hearings and other actions of general interest. 3. Promote supervisor/staff appearances at high school and junior high school government classes. 4. Promote supervisor/staff appearances at meetings of civic leagues and other community organizations. 5. Propose one or more interview programs with local TV and radio stations. One scenario might include the Board Chairman and County Administrator to outline pending matters on a progam run the weekend before a Board meeting, and selected Supervisors to analyze Board actions on the following weekend. 6. When public/government-access cable TV is operative, consider televising Board meetings and/or interviews with Supervisors/Staff. 7. At Board meetings have the Chairman or Staff provide more introductory or background information for all Board resolutions and ordinances, so the audience and news media will have a better idea of what action is being considered. Alternately, provide some additional information in the printed agenda copies that are available to those attending Board meetings. 8. Promote more citizen participation in committees, task forces, etC. 9. Hold more news conferences, with participation by the Board Chairman and County Administrator. There are undoubtedly other approaches that should be considered. Your response would be greatly appreciated. cc: Elmer Hodge, Anne Marie Green, LBE FOI File 8/23/91 Mary Allen: Tina with Council of Community Services, 985-0131, called and said that Mr. Briggs Andrews, Director, Council of Community Services would like to come to the next Board Meeting and speak to the board about their Needs Assessment Program. Told her Aug 27th agenda was being published today and it might be better to come Sept 10 or 24. Told her he would have to speak under Citizens Comments and could be published on the agenda or not. She will check with him to see which date. Told her I would ask you to call her. Brenda 9- s ~.~. a°--~ 9- a ~ ~-- of Services 518 Carlton Terrace Building / P.O. Box 598 920 South Jefferson Street / Roanoke, VA 24004 Telephone: (703) 985-0131 .. _.. ..r PRESIDENT: Broaddus C. Fitzpatrick September 5, 1991 VICE PRESIDENTS: Ms. Mary Allen C. Stan Cross, Jr. Clerk of the Board Howard Packett of Supervisors Cheri Hartman, Ph.D. P• 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Dear Ms. Allen: Briggs Andrews Roger L. Baumgardner This letter is to confirm that Briggs Andrews, Council Carolyn R. Bass of Community Services' Board Member and Chairman of the James P. Beatty Michael W Coffman Needs Assessment Committee, would like to appear before . David C. Douglas the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, Marc S. Fink September 24, 1991 at its 3:00 p. m. session. Mr. J. W. "Bill" Fox, Jr. Andrews would like to share some information on the Jan B. Garrett Council's Needs Assessment Project with you and members Kenneth Haley of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. I am enclos- William F. Hawkins ing information regarding the Project. Edna Henning Calvin Johnson If you have questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Samuel L. Lionberger Andrews, 981-8053, or me. Richard D. Lucas Donna Proctor Sincerely , Marilyn A. Rigby ~~ Wayne Slusher !~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Vanetta Stockton ~ l j ~ , , / j,` ~ , ' ` Mary Ellen Carneal ' -~'-'~~'~-" ' ' ~~~'~ ` ~ s ~-"'` ~ ~ ~ Raleigh ampbell EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Executive Director Raleigh Campbell / j yt Enclosure A United Way Agency `, i' ~~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER September 11, 1991 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated May 14, 1991, the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby approved, effective September 11, 1991. ADDITION QUEENS COURT Route 1955 (Lange Lane) - From Route 1549 to 0.05 mile East Route 1549 Sincerely, a D. Pethtel Commissioner LENGTH 0.05 Mi TRANSP~F',TATION FGr~ THE 21ST CENTURY FOR 9/24 BOARD AGENDA: #1 BOARD REPORT FROM T. HARRINGTON, WEED ORDINANCE. PUBLIC HEARING: PETITION OF CELLULAR ONE TO OBTAIN A USE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERMIT TO ERECT A SELF-SUPPORTING COMMUNICATION TOWER, LOCATED OFF OF 12 O'CLOCK KNOB ROAD, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. RECONSIDER ADDITIONAL PROFFER FOR 301 GILMER ASSOCIATES. PETITIONER HAS PROFFERED THAT NO NEW MINZ-WAREHOUSES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST OF SHELVA WALKER TO OPERATE A BEAUTY SHOP AT THE RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 6961 LA MARRE DRIVE, IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~a~ 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~' o . o~ °z~ ~~° ~zc o x ~ ~, z ~° ~ ~ ~ ~~ z y~ ~ o •~ ~ z ~~ z w ~~ `'~'~ ~~ ~~ o d ~ ~- ,~~ ~o. ~y ~ ~~ ~' ~ o ~ o ~y z~ ~ ~O ~od ~~ a o o~z ~~ ~d~ ~~ o ~~ ~~ dd ~ ~p ~~ o z ~~ b o ~ ° ~' y~ z ~~ ~~ n ~H b ~~ ~' oO ~0~~ ~ O ~ ~ o z~~ r r z ~ y~z ~ d~~ ~~a~. r y ~iT~~j p ~' C ~ ,4'~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a ,~ ~ ~ ,~ r ~~ ~ r pz ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 x ~ ~:~ MEMORANDUM TO: Lee Eddy Bob Johnson Steve McGraw Harry Nickens Dick Robers h~ ~ FROM Mary Allen DATE: September 5, 1991 SUBJECT: Agenda Information Grievance Panel: Kim Owens has asked me to express appreciation to the Board for allowing her to serve on the Grievance Panel. However, she does not wish to serve another term. Report on Literary Loan Proiects Dr. Wilson has asked that this item be continued to September 24. Because of school openings, he has not had a change to do a more detailed report as the Board has requested. .~ DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Marv Allen DEPT: Board of Supervisors FROM: Mary Hale DEPT: Utility SUBJECT Board Report dated Sept. 24, 1991 DATE: September 11, 1991 Would you please replace the first sheet of the Board Report for Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22 with the one attached. If you have any questions, please call me. Thanks. i ~' ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22, Old Heritage Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22, dated July 28, 1989, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $16,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary sewer facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer from Section 22 along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~~~d~~ M A (~ ~ ~ Uhl M~ ~~~~nP~ ~or i~(~'e~n~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ,s <Sg-,6 ~ S7~'D~ e~ ~roo k- ~r~~e I~-~ G n o k-? U~ L ~i ~O~ g (~~ 774- 6St~ S totalling $42,225.20 for a mentor teacher program. A-91091-4 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT GRANTS URC 4. Approval of agreement with Roanoke County Resource Authority to provide for reimbursement of staff expenses. A-91091-5 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE ALT #1 AND APPROVE AGREEMENT URC 5. Adoption of resolution authorizing the acquisition of land from Mary Viola Bush by eminent domain proceedings. R-91091-6 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION WITH APCO OFFICIALS ON TRANSMISSION LINE. WORK SESSION SET FOR 10/8/91 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement located on lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 3 2. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of a sanitary sewer easement from H. M. and Learleen D. Obenchain. 0-91091-8 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC I. APPOINTMENTS ' 1. Community Corrections Resources Board Cry n --F ~ r m LBE NOIVIINATED CHRIS PICKARD TO ONE-YEAR TERM AS ALTERNATE 2. Grievance Panel HCN TO CONTACT CECIL HILL 3. Industrial Development Authority LBE SUGGESTED REC011~IlVIENDATIONS FROM VIlV'rON TOWN COUNCIL -BOARD CONSENSUS TO GO FORWARD J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII..L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. s SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ANNOUNCED TWO CITIZENS CALLED HIM TO APOLOGIZE FOR SUPPORTING CRAIG CREEK OPTION. (2) SUGGESTED STUDYING TWO REFUSE FEES -ONE FOR THOSE WHO RECYCLE AND ONE FOR THOSE WHO DON'T. (3) NOTED THAT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS WERE RECENTLY LISTED AS 7TH IN FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF SCHOOLS. SUPERVISOR NICKENS: ANNOUNCED HE DID NOT AGREE WITH LBE'S MEMO THAT BOARD AND STAFF TAKES A CAVALIER ATTITUDE TOWARDS CITIZENS AND THINKS COUNTY DOES GOOD JOB OF INVOLVING CITIZENS. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) ANNOUNCED BLUE RIDGE REGION STUDY COMII~IISSION MET ON AUG. 26 AND WILL MEET AGAIN ON SEPT. 24. THANI~D BOARD FOR SUPPORT OF ORGANIZATION. (2) ANNOUNCED HE WAS REAPPOINTED TO GRAYSON CONIlVIISSION AND THAT VMI~VACO TASK FORCE WILL MEET AGAIN BETWEEN NOW AND THE END OF THE YEAR. L. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS SUSAN WILLIAMS, LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS ANNOUNCED PUBLIC HEARING SPONSORED BY VA. DEPT ON AGING TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 12 AT VALLEY METRO ON SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION RECONIlVIENDATIONS. INVITED BOARD MEMBERS TO ATTEND AND PROVIDE INPUT. WERE NOT ALLOWED TO HOLD PUBLIC F[FARING AT ROANOKE COUNTY BECAUSE OF RADAR FUNDING. ECH WILL INVESTIGATE AND REPORT BACK ON 9/24/91. BOYD OVER.STREET, PRESIDENT OF BENT MOUNTAIN CIVIC LEAGUE ASKED THAT OLD BENT MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION EITHER BE MAIlVTAINED OR DEMOLISHED. M. REPORTS MEMORANDUM TO: John Chambli_s~s FROM Mary Alien 7rly~~ DATE: September 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Specialized Transportation At the Board meeting on September 10, Susan Williams with the League of Older Americans spoke regarding a public hearing being held for comment on special needs transportation. She informed the Board at that time that RADAR, the special needs transportation for Roanoke City refuses to come into the County. The Board asked for a report on why they have this policy. Mr. Hodge would like you to investigate and prepare a report for the September 24 meeting. You might want to talk with Debbie Pitts regarding this. She informed me yesterday that this is a decision by the Department of Transportation based on the fact that Roanoke County does not subsidize Valley Metro. ~, v THELMA E BLAND COMMISSIONER Department for the Aging 700 East Franklin Street 10th Floor Richmond. vir,~inia 23219-2j27 TO: Executive Directors, Area Agencies on Aging FROM: Bob Knox SUBJECT: Specialized Transportation Recommendations DATE: August 20, 1991 91-266 TELEPHONE 1804) 225-227, rrr 180a) 2zs-z27, In May, pursuant to HJR 299,' Lieutenant~Governor Beyer appointed a committee to study transportation services for the elderly and disabled solicit the views and suggestions of local governments and local governmental agencies, affected state agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and concerned individuals develop a flexible and cost-effective plan for providing improved transportation services for the elderly and disabled. Commissioner Bland chaired the committee, which included a number of persons involved in public transportation or human service transportation. AAA personnel included. Susan Williams, Dennis Horton, John Skirven, Debbie Palmer, and Sherman Saunders. The committee has drafted proposed recommendations and is planning public hearings on them in the month of September. A copy is attached. The final recommendations will go to the Beyer Commission for review and adoption in October. The recommendations do not call for additional expenditures by local governments, but they do increase their involvement and cooperation in providing specialized transportation to the elderly and disabled. Therefore, we are actively soliciting the views and suggestions of local government officials. The main recommendation of the committee is statutory establishment of a state "Specialized Transportation Council," to guide regional coordination for specialized transportation services. The membership, appointed by the Governor, includes the Secretary of Health and Human Resources and the Secretary of ~ `M~ An Equal Opportunity Emplover `~ MEMORANDUM TO: Cliff Craig FROM Mary Allen `~'1~~' DATE: September 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Low Flow Toilets Mr. Hodge asked that I remind you that the Board of Supervisors would like a report on low flow toilets for the September 24 meeting. If you will not be able to have the report for that meeting, please let me know. SuGGESTL+'ll ~rr•UK1~J K~ MAIUL '1'u 11Vl:KrAJL~ 1.Y11GLrv INVOLVEMENT. ASKED FOR APPROPRIATE TEAMS TO DEVELOP. NO CONSENSUS TO SUPPORT. AMG TO EVALUATE SUGGESTIONS AND BRING BACK A REPORT. (3) CONCERNED ABOUT TONE IN RCT ARTICLE ON CRAIG CREEK WATER OPTION. (4) ASKED FOR REPORT ON LOW FLOW TOILETS. STAFF TO BRING BACK ON 9/24/91. 6 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Cellular One to obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to erect a self-supporting communication tower, located off of Twelve O'clock Knob Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1991 ~"~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, September 10, 1991 Tuesday, September 17, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Scott Basham Cellular One 5228 Valley Pointe Parkway, Suite 2 Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 345-0808 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on a Special Exception Request of Shelva Walker to operate a beauty shop at the residence, located at 6961 LaMarre Drive, in the Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1991 Mary H. Al en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, September 10, 1991 Tuesday, September 17, 1991 To be paid on delivery by: Shelva Walker 6961 LaMarre Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 366-8248 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 i 4 a a a. LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. on the petition of THE ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS requesting VACATION OF A 20 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 21 AND 22, VISTA FOREST SUBDIVISION, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1991. Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Dept. of Engineering & Inspections County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 24, 1991, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. on the petition of LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION requesting VACATION OF A 20 FOOT WATERLINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON TRACT 1 D, VALLEYPOINTE, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1991. Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 12 South Third Street Richmond, VA 23219 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of 301 Gilmer Associates to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow a self-storage facility, located at 6426 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1991 5'Y~a~..~~,-- ;~1. Mary H. A en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, September 10, 1991 Tuesday, September 17, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: 301 Gilmer Associates PO Box 1138 Roanoke, VA 24006 (703) 982-1210 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 URC 2ND - 9/24/91 2. Ordinance vacating a 20 foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC 2ND READING - 9/24/91 3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of a portion of Green Hill Park to the Roanoke Symphony Association. RWR MOTION TO APPROVE URC ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT ON EXACT COSTS TO ROANOKE COUNTY REGARDING POLO MATCH ~/lc~ - ~/~ 1l fcj ~ 4. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a 13.88 acre parcel of land to construct a Water Pump Station for the Spring Hollow Water Project. BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE URC H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article II, Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code of Chapter 9, Fire Prevention and Protection. 0-91091-7 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 4 BOARD MEETING CHECK UST MEETING DATE: Minister: Reminder: Public Hearings Advertised: • Draft Agenda Prepared: Reminder to Outside Participants: Prepare any "fancy" resolutions: BOARD MEETING DAY: Board Reading File Done: "Fancy" Resolutions Signed and ready: Tapes Prepared: Sound System Ready: Room Set up: Media Packet ready: Double Spaced Agenda: Chairman told of anything different: • Extra Agenda Copies: Dinner Plans: # People for Dinner: AGENDA FOLLOWUP Action Agenda Prepared and sent: Thank you letter -Minister: Resolutions and Ordinances Completed: Board Report Action completed: Appointment Letters: Bingo/Raffle Letters: Other letters prepared: Meeting Board filed in: • Followup memos to staff: Other: a~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Lowell Gobble. SL 2. oft of Appreciat.~un~~°to~~Joe~~homas for his efforts on bell f of th~~een Hill Park e~s~n Center. u.- D. NEW BUSINESS ~S' 1. Resolution of Support for Roanoke County's United Way Campaign. 2. Report from Mr. Briggs Andrews, Council of Community Services' Board Member, and Chairman, Needs Assessment Project. ~' ~ 3. Re i sop ing ce ain requir s of the epart a of Waste M ent. __________-- - ~__ _._. ----- U ~~ ~ ~~~ , __ - ~ __ E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance authorizing a Use Not Provided for Permit to allow a caretaker's mobile home in the campground, located at 5753 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dixie Caverns & Pottery, Inc. 2. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on a 0.685 acre tract zoned B-2 and obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a taxi service located at 4909 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 3. ~An ;ordinance to rezone approximately 2.15 acres from B- b B-2 to construct a motel, located at the intersection ~~Plantation Road and Friendshi Lane Hollins P Magisterial District, upon the petition of Relax, Inc. H. '~`I SREADING OF ORDINANCES 3 I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel. 2. Industrial Development Authority. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. 2. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Hunting Hills, Sewer, from Section 22. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities serving Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2. 4. Donation of a water, sewer and drainage easement from David L & Diane L. Caldwell to the County of Roanoke. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit for Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots Program. 4 K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COD~IlVIUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Board Contingency Fund 3. Accounts Paid -August 1991 ~1,1~C~-- 4. g ~C ~ U~'~ e~s~a ~ citizen involvement. e-~-- L, ~ 5. low flow toilets. (~~-~ ~-~ ~~ ~~-~---_______-~.--- KPp1~I-r~--on-z~o~Th~.~~ti~li~. 1~i1-1~n-~r.~~~1-° c-~51f'~ U~/~-- S~ 7. a olicies regarding RADAR transportation into the County and funding. ~ LJ 8. Report from(School Board on Literary Loan Projects. '- ---~. --- eed- Ordinanc rr~^- N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION P. PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS ~~ 1~1~~ 1. Resolutions of Congratulations to Vinton Dixie Debs Softball Team for winning State Title. ~~' 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the Cave Spring Dixie Girls Softball Team for winning the State Title and runner-up in the National Tournament. Q. PUBLIC HEARINGS 991-1 Special Exception Request of Shelva Walker to operate a beauty shop located at 6961 LaMarre Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. R. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 991-2 An ordinance to rezone 4.647 acres from R-3 to B-2 for general commercial use, located on the south side of 6 Peters Creek Road at its intersection with Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation. (CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 22, 1991, AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER) 991-3 An ordinance to rezone .71 acre from R-1 to M-1 to allow aself-storage facility, located at 6426 Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of 301 Gilmer Associates. (REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 27, 1991) 991-4 An ordinance to obtain a Use Not Provided for Permit to erect aself-suppor ng communication tower, located off of Twelve O'cloc Kno~R~ad, Catawba Magisterial District, upon th petiti of Cellular One. 991-5 An ordinance authorizing the vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement located on lots 21 and 22, Vista Forest subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 991-6 An ordinance vacating a 20 foot water line easement located on Tract 1D, Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. 991-7 An ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a 13.88 acre parcel of land to construct a Water Pump Station for the Spring Hollow Water Project. S.~E3 CO READ ~ OF ORDINANCES 1. O 'nanc au orizing t se f a portion of Green i P ~ tot anoke Symphony Association. 2. Ordina ce amendin a Roanoke County Code Article III, w r Use St nd~rds of C per 16 Co f 197 (C pt~'r 18, C de of 1985) Ol~-TINUE FIFO UL 2.1991 AN SEPTEMB 10. `19911 CITIZEN CONIl~fCNTS AND COMMUNICATIONS i~. ADJOURNLI~NT s ti Q 00 Q~ ~ ~ ~~~T~ ~ ~\ ~ • 2~ ~ o. 20 o'~~ oh ah~` ,~y1~'~ 1~ S~ 8° .sip, „~ °G,~ a p0 .p ~ ~yh ~, °A, ~c ZI ~~~y ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ °~ EXIyT,n&, TO ~~ ~: ~~ ~% t3EMA(N 9i \ ~ - ..C , } 6~ 23 W 22 a ~ S M p EXISr.20' ~ ~~ naalNA~~ ~ 4 .' M EAgEMENT ~ m ~ ~ FOa EXIST, SWQCE rv ~E ~ACQ7Ea Acaoss coTti zl 30• A 6\~ Z? FOa~ST ~ / ~ P (50,~/~'` N59e 981p ~~h EXIti7, ZO'X J ~ ~ ~ ZO' nF{AI NAGS EASEMENT 74 REMA(N CURVE DAT UL<Y1'i "A" . L11\VLL 54°34'03" ~~~ ~~ 105.00' 100.00' ' 54.16' 1` 96.26' 35' 176 "$" "C" 42°11'15" 75°55'16" 245.00` 180.40 25.00' 33.13' 94.5 19.50' . 30.76' ' "D" 10°16'22" 676.55'. 121.30' 60.81' 121.14 NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE.EZ:OOD INSUR- ANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. ..; ~~;~ , ~... _ . „~„ ~a~vE CH. BEARING S 86°30'17" E S 80°18'53" E S 63°26'52" E S 30°37'25" E PLAT SHOWING 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED BY rcuNNUrtt GUUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SITUATED ON LOTS 21 & 22, .,F.AI-T~ O.~ , VTCTA FnRFST (P.B. 10. PAGE 158) ?~~'1 t ~~~~'~ ~ Z~ ~~M , t)t1~ Q ~Q` ,`[~ ~~ ~~~ h~P G ~~ R ye ,~~ s ~ o m P ~~'- J ~1Q~Q' 1 ~ ~ ~6°~k y1 ~ y1" ~ s !4 ~' ~. s ~ o m 33~•~~ r h 36°~~' 1' PG ~~~~ 7 ~ ~c~pg,.~~2 .~,~at fi 31,01 1A~ ~ ~1 ~aTY EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (P.g. 1c7 PG. -49) i ~ ~ i Ngh'0o'DO"E-- 17 ' I 350.56' ~ r)RAINQGE EASEMENT (P,P tZ PG. 33) s' y ~ 50'AGGE55 EASEMENT (P.B.12 PG.33~ -~ o ~' , ~ TRAGT 1 ~ 3.813 ACaES M i ~ i 9 A3 A4 ~-,-_,_~-,----i- m At _ ~ ~% i %~ '~~~ - =~ ~ =~- _~-- ,..~!-~ EX15r 20'WAtER (,iNE EASEMENT Ah ' A~ (1°,b.ll PG.46) TO gE YAGATEp 13V TuE -~ A~ a0AN0l~E GOUNtY P~OQa-~ OF SUPERVIhORS -~ ~ h o- ~~ o 3 ~` Q O Q ~a N o ~ 10 ~ M ` , ~ t ~ ~~.. C j> 7f~AC7 3A o~ v CURVE D ATA CURVE ANGLE RADIUS ARC TAN CHORD CH. BEARING C-1 14° 05'45" 611.62' 150.47' 75.62' 150.09' S 64° 34' 11" W " C-2 18° 52'03" 661.62' 217.87' 109.93' 216.89' N 62° ° 11' 02 E " C-3 90° 00'00" 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' S 82 14' E 59 " C-4 02° 23'00" 1457.40' 60.62' 30.32' 60.62' S 38° 26' E 29 " C-5 06° 09'16" 1407.40' 151.17' 75.66' 151.10' S 42° 42' E 37 PLAT SHOWING 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING VACATED BY ~ rnl IAITV an~R~ t7F SIIPFRV I SORS 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT Al-A2 N55° 16'25"W 21.03' CH. A2-A3 N52° 45' 01"E 71.33' A3-A4 N32° 21' 47"E 42.22' A4-M N54° 50' 48"E 253.97' M-A5 553° 15' 03"E 21.04' A5-A6 S54° 50' 48"W 256.53' A6-A7 S32° 21' 47"W 41.84' A7-A1 S52° 45' 01"W 68.42' s m ~o - 15'punr;~c Ur-~~rV EASEMENT (Pr3,i2 PG.33) ^_ naA-NAGE EA~FMENT (P, e. -2 pG, 33) ~' VAG~EYr~gaK ..~ ~_ -- 4 TRAC7 1 E Z (P, r3.13 PU, 29) TRI~CT 19 (P13.11 PG,46) 7"QX '~ 37, 07 - I - 14. I J___ 5o'al-~