No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/1991 - Regular~~ ROAN ~~ ar4 ~ L ~~ 7! 2 ~ J ? a 18 ,Eso; 88 SFS~UICENTENµ~P~ 1 BmnnhtlBcgrmm~g nuaw ~I11~It~LJ II~ ~II~iliil~P 1 ~~9~8~9 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held c-n the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will 6e announced. PRIOR TO THIS AFTERNOON'S MEETING THERE WILL BE A MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT 2:00 P.M. THIS WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER THE MEETINGS IN DECEMBER WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 3 AND DECEMBER 17 1991. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend F. Tupper Garden Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE i ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS LBE ADDED ITEM D-0 RESO OPPOSING DIVISION OF ROANOKE COUNTY INTO TWO OR MORE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS. HCN ASKED THAT ITEM D-5 BE DISCUSSED AT END OF NEW BUSINESS IF CITIZEN IS NOT PRESENT TO SPEAK. LBE ADDED REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF PROTEST REGARDING APCO TRANSMISSION LINE. ECH ADDED 1ST READING OF ORD REGARDING EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH VINYARD PARK C. PROC7AMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 17 through 23, 1991 as American Education Week. BL,T MOTION TO ADOPT UW 2. Recognition of receipt of the Governor's Award for Ernironmental Excellence. TERRY HARRINGTON AND GARDNER SMITH ACCEPTED. TH ANNOUNCED SECRETARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILL HOLD SPECIAL RECOGNIITON OF AWARD IN ROANOKE CO. AT LATER DATE. SAM RECOGNIZED PACK 280 WEBLOS WHO WERE PRESENT SAM PRESENTED SIX-YEAR ANNIVERSARY GIFT TO ECH D. NEW BUSINESS a 0. Resolution opposing the division of Roanoke County into two or more congressional districts. R-111991-1 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AND FAX TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY AYE S-LBE,BI~,HCN, SAM NAYS-RWR 1. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for funding for Transitional Living Center. A-111991-2 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE $10,000 FUNDING FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND URC 2. Request for County share of traffic light at Intersection of Route 117 and Northside High School Road. A-111991-3 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE $12,500 FUNDING FROM CAPITAL FUND URC 3. A-111991-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Request from School Board for acceptance of $3,000 award and appropriation to School Capital Improvement Fund. A-111991-5 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 5. Presentation of Year-end Audit. A-111991-6 BLJ SUBST. MOTION TO ALLOCATE $375,000 FOR $100 BONUS FOR Request from School Board for acceptance of $10,450 federal grant for the School Federal Programs Fund. 3 COUNTY AND SCHOOL EMPLOYEES AYES-RWR,BLJ NAYS-LBE,HCN,SAM HCN MOTION TO ADD $791,332 TO UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND THAT $12,500 OF THE SCHOOL BOARD SURPLUS BE ALLOCATED TO NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC LIGHT AYES-LBE,HCN,SAM NAYS-RWR,BI.J 6. Approval of amendment to the Employee Handbook - Sick Leave Bank. A-111991-7 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED BY BOARD MEMBERS URC 7. R-111991-8 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-RWR,BI~T,HCN,SAM NAYS-LBE 8. A-111991-9 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-RWR,BL~T,HCN,SAM NAYS-LBE 9. A-111991-10 HcN MOTION TO APPROVE URC Authorization to acquire by eminent domain 2.3 acres of land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for Spring Hollow Reservoir project. Request to amend engineering services agreement with Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow construction management. Approval of revised Capital Improvement Program Review Process and Calendar of Events. 4 10. Authorization to negotiate lease for Courthouse and Jail parking facilities. A-111991-11 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-LBE,RWR,BI~J,SAM NAYS-HCN E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON MONTHLY UTILITY BILLING - DISCUSSED UNDER REPORTS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING PUBLIC HEARINGS SET FOR 12/17/91 URC 1. Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 3.59 acres from Neighborhood Conservation to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to construct an office located at the northwest corner of Enon and Waldron Drive, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of James C. Wilson. 2. Ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to 5 operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair facility located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vito DeMonte. 3. Ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to operate a used household appliance shop, located at 1806 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of ~erett J. Miles, Sr. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of two parcels of land from Canaan Land Company in connection with the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING 2ND - 12/3/91 URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of real estate adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/3/91 URC I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to the Valley Soccer Club. (THIS HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 3, 1991.1 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the 6 addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems. (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 22, 1991) 0-111991-12 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED AND CHANGING FEES NO VOTE HCN SUBST. MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED WITH FEES REMAINING THE SAME. URC 3. 0-111991-13 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC J. APPOIlVTMENTS 1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board LBE NOMINATED HARRY NICKENS TO THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 12/31/94. 2. Grievance Panel 3. Library Board 4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors RWR NOMNATED RITA J. GLINIECKI TO THItEE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 12/31/94. MIiA TO CONTACT MHSRV REGARDING Z/91 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18, 1985 Code (formerly Article III, Chapter 16, Code of 1971). (CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1991) LETTER ASKING THAT BOARD MEMBER BE APPOINTED. 5. Planning Commission RWR REAPPOINTED DONALD R WITT TO FOUR-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 12/31/1995. RWR TO DISCUSS WITH SUPERVISOR-ELECT MINNIX 6. Social Services Board HCN TO MAKE NOMINATION IN DECEMBER K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII,L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-111991-14 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC 1. Approval of Minutes -October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991 2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department Board of Directors. A-111991-14.a 3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station. s A-111991-14.6 4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III Project. A-111991-14.c 5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project. A-111991-14.d L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) REMINDED BOARD OF RIBBON CUTTING AT READ MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION. (2) ASKED THAT LEASE PURCHASE MEMO BE PLACED ON 12/3/91 AGENDA UNDER REPORTS. (3) ASKED PMM TO RESEARCH CONFLICT BETWEEN CHARTER AND STATE CODE REGARDING AUTHORITY OF LIBRARY BOARD OVER LIBRARY DIRECTION AND VVT~THER LIBRARY BOARD COULD BE ABOLISHED. PMM WILL REPORT BACK PRIOR TO 12/3/91 MEETING. (4) CONCERNED ABOUT THE EXTRA TWO HOLIDAYS AT CHRISTMAS FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES AND COST TO CITIZENS. SUPERVISOR NICKENS: (1) ATTENDED VACO ANNUAL CONFERENCE. (2) ANNOUNCED THAT STATE SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT WILL NOT CHANGE THE AUTHORITY FOR INVESTIGATION OF CHILD ABUSE IN SCHOOLS. (2) $13.SM IN LOTTERY TICKETS PURCHASED IN ROANOKE COUNTY. PRIZE COULD BE REDUCED WITH SHARE GOING TO LO('-Ai i7TES, ~O OPPOSED TO PROPOSAL THAT LOCALITIES SHARE WITH STATE (80.20) COSTS OF ROAD 117AINTENANCE. SUGGESTED THESE BE INCLUDED IN LEGISLATIVE PACKET. (3) SUGGESTED THAT TO AVOID STREET SIGNS BEING STOLEN FREQUENTLY, THE COUN'T'Y 9 COULD SELL THEM TO CITIZENS WHO WANT THEM. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON• (1) ASKED AMG TO CONTACT CITIZENS IN LABELLVUE ABOUT READ MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION. (2) ATTENDED MEETING IN SALEM ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND ASKED THAT THIS ISSUE BE INCLUDED IN JANUARY BOARD RETREAT. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) THERE HAS BEEN NO AGREEMENT YET BETWEEN THE VACO/VML TASK FORCE. (2) ANNOUNCED THE EMPLOYEE LUNCH WII.L BE DECEMBER 18 AND CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING WII,L BE DECEMBER 4. M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIiJNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS BIJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 6 AND 9 AND REMOVAL OF ITEM 6 FOR A VOTE. UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -October 1991 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for four months ended October 31, 1991 6. Report on Monthly Utility Billing io A-111991-15 LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION - NO CONSENSUS HCN MOTION TO IlVIPLEMENT ALT. #4 WITH NO ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AYES-RWR,BIiT,HCN,SAM NAYS-LBE 7. Report from Youth Haven II S. Report on proposed Noise Ordinance 9. Industrial Development Authority 1990/91 Audit O. WORK SESSIONS (I~LD FOLLOWING EVENTING SESSIONT~ 1. Design and Operation of Water Treatment Plant. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) FOR CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND BRIEFINGS BY STAFF MEMBERS PERTAINING TO ACTUAL OR PROBABLY LITIGATION, I.E. GRUMMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY. BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:40 P.M. URC EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-111991-16 HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT RESO AT 7:15 P.M. URC ii R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior Women's CIu6 for founding the Roanoke County Library System in 1933. R-111991-17 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE URC DOT ELLER WITH WOMEN'S CLUB ACCEPTED THE RESO S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 1191-1 0-111991-18 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE URC 1191-2 An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. 0-111991-19 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. iz T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1191-3 Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. LBE MOTION TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO 12/3/91 URC 4 CITIZENS SPOKE JH TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS U. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of easements between CWY, Inc. and the County of Roanoke in connection with Berkley Court Subdivision and Vinyard Park. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/3/91 AYES-I.BE,RWR,HCN,SAM ABSTAIN-BI.~ NEW BUSINESS 1. NOTICE OF PROTEST REGARDING APCO TRANSMISSION LINE SAM DIRECTED PMM TO PREPARE A "FRIENDLY" NOTICE OF PROTEST. 2. ACTION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION WITH GRUMMAN EQUIPMENT HCN MOTION TO FILE THE NECESSARY LEGAL DOCUMENTS 13 AGAINST GRLT~VIMAN TO COVER THE LOSS OF EQUIPMENT URC V. CITIZEN CO1VIlViENTS AND C011~IlVIUNICATIONS 1. W. H. HIGHFILL , TLR, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF THE SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT. CONTINUING TO INVESTIGATE CHILD ABUSE CASES IN SCHOOL SYSTEMS. RWR MOTION TO RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN 10/22/91 AYES-RWR,HCN,SAM NAYS-LBE,BLJ HCN MOTION TO APPROVE SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD POSITION THAT INVESTIGATION OF CHII,D ABUUE IN SCHOOL SYSTEMS BE IlWESTIGATED BY SOCIAL SERVICES RATHER THAN SCHOOL BOARDS, AND THAT LETTERS BE SENT TO THE APPROPRIATE INDIVIDUALS ADVISING THEM OF THIS ACTION. AYES - RWR, HCN, SAM NAYS-LBE,BLJ WORK SESSION DESIGN AND OPERATION OF TREATMENT PLAN PRESENTED BY CLIFF CRAIG OPEN SESSION HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 1030 P.M. - UW HCN MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MOVE FORWARD WITH TEST BORINGS ON THE WEST SITE, PROVIDED THERE IS NO INTEREST BY CITY OF SALEM TO JOIlVTLY PARTICIPATE IN THE SALEM SITE, AND THAT STAFF PROCEED TO SECURE AN OPTION FOR THE LAND SUBJECT TO 14 TESTING AND APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AYES-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM ABSTAIN-LBE WORK SESSION BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO WORK SESSION FORMAT AT 1035 AYES-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM ABSTAIN - LBE ECH WII,L BRING BACK REPORT ON 12/3 REGARDING A CONCEPT PLAN FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT PIANT MADE UP OF TEAM OF COUNTY ENGINEERS AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS FROM THE ROANOKE VALLEY. V. ADJOURNMENT RWR MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 10:50 P.M. UW 15 OF ROANp~~ °~ a~ • ~~~~' $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul8cginning (~II~tri~~ itf ~D~triII~2F ~ .mac ~ ~-g •8.9 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. PRIOR TO THIS AFTERNOON'S MEETING THERE WILL BE A MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT 2:00 P.M. THIS WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER THE MEETINGS IN DECEMBER WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 3 AND DECEMBER 17, 1991. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend F. Tupper Garden Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 17 through 23, 1991 as American Education Week. 2. Recognition of receipt of the Governor's Award for Environmental Excellence. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for funding for Transitional Living Center. 2. Request for County share of traffic light at Intersection of Route 117 and Northside High School Road. 3. Request from School Board for acceptance of $10,450 federal grant for the School Federal Programs Fund. 4. Request from School Board for acceptance of $3,000 award and appropriation to School Capital Improvement Fund. 5. Presentation of Year-end Audit. 6. Approval of amendment to the Employee Handbook - Sick Leave Bank. 7. Authorization to acquire by eminent domain 2.3 acres of land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for Spring Hollow Reservoir project. 8. Request to amend engineering services agreement with Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow construction management. a 9. Approval of revised Capital Improvement Program Review Process and Calendar of Events. 10. Authorization to negotiate lease for Courthouse and Jail parking facilities. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 3.59 acres from Neighborhood Conservation to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to construct an office located at the northwest corner of Enon and Waldron Drive, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of James C. Wilson. 2. Ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair facility located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vito DeMonte. 3. Ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to operate a used household appliance shop, located at 1806 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr. 3 H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of two parcels of land from Canaan Land Company in connection with the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project. 2. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of real estate adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to the Valley Soccer Club. THIS HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 3, 1991.) 2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems. (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 22, 1991) 3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18, 1985 Code (formerly Article III, Chapter 16, Code of 1971). (CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1991) J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board 2. Grievance Panel 3. Library Board 4 4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors 5. Planning Commission 6. Social Services Board K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991 2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department Board of Directors. 3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III Project. 5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project. 5 L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -October 1991 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for four months ended October 31, 1991 6. Report on Monthly Utility Billing 7. Report from Youth Haven II 8. Report on proposed Noise Ordinance 9. Industrial Development Authority 1990/91 Audit O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Design and Operation of Water Treatment Plant. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 6 EVENTING SESSION R PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club for founding the Roanoke County Library System in 1933. S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 1191-1 An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. 1191-2 An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1191-3 Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. U. CITIZEN CONIlVIENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. ADJOURNMENT C-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEER OF NOVEMBER 17 THROUGH 23, 1991 AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEER WHEREAS, the health of America's democracy tomorrow depends on the children in America's classrooms today; and WHEREAS, America's public schools remain the surest pathway to a future more prosperous, more just, and more free; and WHEREAS, each community's public schools must prepare the next generation for a new constellation of social, economic, ethical, and political challenges; and WHEREAS, quality education demands the active involvement and collaboration of all segments of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of November 17 through 23, 1991, as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEER and urge all citizens to observe this week with appropriate activities and to renew their commitment to the education of every child. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto set our hands and caused the seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this 19th day of November, 1991. f 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Report; Receipt of 1991 Environmental Excellence Award; Crowell's Gap Cleanup. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: / j~ 'i ~~ ~,~ - _ BACKGROUND' In April of this year, Roanoke County orchestrated a public/private partnership that resulted in the cleanup of what became known as the "Crowell's Gap Dump". With the assistance of Franklin County and over thirty private sector individuals and firms, thirty-three tons of illegally dumped refuse were removed from this beautiful mountain hillside and were legally placed in the regional landfill. Over $100,000 in equipment and labor were donated to this effort. The Board commended all of the involved parties in May of 1991 (Resolution 52891-1). In August of this year, the Department of Planning and Zoning submitted this commendable effort as a nominee for the 1991 Governor's Environmental Excellence Awards. Statewide over 300 nominations were submitted. In October we were notified that we had received one of the sixteen awards granted this year. In recognizing Roanoke County, the Governor cited the cooperation between Roanoke County and Franklin County and the successful partnership between the public and private sectors. Roanoke County and Franklin County jointly accepted the award at a dinner ceremony with Governor Wilder held on October 17th. Lee Garman, who was instrumental in orchestrating the cleanup, accepted the award from the Governor on the County's behalf. The Governor presented Mr. Garman a framed resolution, and a large banner commemorating the receipt of this award. ~" 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board recognize the County's receipt of this award, and direct that the banner be displayed in the Community Room of the RCAC. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. Harrin on Director of Plann ng and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~ 4L/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 111991-1 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OPPOSING THE DIVISION OF ROANORE COUNTY INTO TWO OR MORE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, news reports indicate that the Virginia General Assembly is considering one or more congressional redistricting plans that would divide Roanoke County between the sixth and ninth congressional districts; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors believes that future relations with Congress will be enhanced and strengthened if the entire county remains in one congressional district; and WHEREAS, dividing Roanoke County into two or more congressional districts will create undue confusion among Roanoke County citizens who have historically been part of the sixth congressional district; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the strongest opposition be stated to any redistricting plan that would divide Roanoke County into two or more congressional districts; and FURTHER, that copies of this resolution be transmitted immediately by electronic means to all members of the Virginia State Senate and House of Delegates who represent areas of Roanoke County and to Congressman Jim Olin. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to approve the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Robers A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~ ' Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Roanoke Valley Legislators Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ACTION NO. A-111991-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ _ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Total Action Against Poverty for additional funding for the Transitional Living Center COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 8 COMMENTS: `;~,,~.,,,~ iy~~~~^~ r~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Total Action Against Poverty has requested time on the agenda to update the Board on the Transitional Living Center. Representatives also plan to make a request for additional funds for the project. During the 1991-92 budget process, the Board of Supervisors approved a $15,000 contribution to the Center. Staff at TAP has indicated that they will be making a request for additional funds in the amount of $10,000 to help meet the required federal match for the HUD Supportive Housing Demonstration Grant. Roanoke City Council recently approved an additional $75,000 and TAP also plans to ask the City of Salem for additional funds. TAP originally asked for a deadline extension of November 15, 1991 to confirm that matching funds would be available. The deadline has again been extended to allow Roanoke County to take action on this request. Attached is further information regarding the Transitional Living Center. FISCAL IMPACT: $10,000 must be appropriated from the Unappropriated Balance or Board Contingency Fund for this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the $10,000 request for additional funds, and that the funds be allocated from the Board Contingency Fund. ~_i 7 ^ - %F jj r ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Richard W. Robers motion to approve $10,000 funding from Eddy Board Contingency Fund Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance VOTE No Yes Abs x X x x x Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Education Employment Health Housing and Homelessness Neighbodroods Economic Development Crime Prevention Cabell Brand, President Georgia Meadows, Vice ('resident Elizabeth Bowles, Secretary Lewis Peery, Creasurer Monty Plymale, A ssisla n t Sncrctnry/Treasurer John Berry Sarah Bostic Pauline Brower Betty Carpenter Elmore Dennis Ted Feinour John Fishwick Jeanne Goddard Cleo Hardy Zane )ones A. C. Jordan Hilda Larson Laurence Levy Betty Littleton Gertrude Logan Dorothy Mendenhall A. 6V. MEn rill Rosa Miller Meredith L. Mills Paul Moyer Lewis Nelson Larry Rcnfroe Rev. James W. Reynolds Malika Shakoor Linda Scruggs William Sparrow Elizabeth Stokes Floruu: Thornhill W. D. lNard Bernice Watson Nancy Williams Posl Office Box 2868 Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 (703J 345-6781 Fax (703) 345-4461 October 17, 1991 Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Administrator 3738 Brambleton Avenue SW Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: ~_i On behalf of the Board of Total Action Against Poverty, I am respectfully requesting the emergency allocation of $10,000 for the Transitional Living Center. We are truly grateful for the consistent support demonstrated by Roanoke County for the TLC since its opening three years ago. Due to drastic decreases in local private charitable contributions which, in past years, have helped us to meet the required match for the HUD Supportive Housing Demonstration Grant, we are $87,000 short of the matching funds required for the Program Year which begins December 1, 1991. Our contract with HUD requires us to confirm matching funds for PY 91-92 by September 30, 1991. We have requested and received an extension of this deadline until November 15, 1991. It was the decision of the TAP Board to go back to each locality to request additional emergency funding to make up the existing shortfall. With the decade of federal funding cuts and the problems we have had over the last few years, the agency is simply not in the position to provide the funds. To do so would seriously jeopardize other critical education, employment, housing and health care services. The Transitional Living Center has been a godsend to homeless people, helping them to get on their feet. Over the last three ~- i years, we have served more than 700 residents. Of the 274 residents served last year, 60% were assisted in obtaining income, either through employment or eligibility for benefits, and one- third of the residents who left the TLC were transitioned into permanent housing. Cabell will be appearing before the Board of Supervisors on Monday afternoon with a presentation on the TLC and the request for $10,000. Meeting the HUD match is imperative if the TLC is to continue to provide critically needed services to the homeless in our community. Roanoke County's financial support is crucial if the match is to be met. Sincerely, ~ ~~~~~ Ted Edlich Executive Director cc: Members of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~ -i I am here today with an emergency request on behalf of the Transitional Living Center for $10,000 to complete the focal match required to access the federal grant funds. Just over a month ago, the TLC was in a serious deficit situation, with less than $75,000 raised of the $162,000 needed to match the HUD grant. It was the decision of the TAP Board of Directors to request emergency allocations from each of the Valley governments to make up the difference of $87,000 in order to meet the November 15 deadline for confirmation to HUD of the match. Requests were made to Roanoke City ($74,952), Botetourt County ($2,500), Salem ($5,000) and Roanoke County ($10,000). To date, Roanoke City has pledged $72,500 and Salem has contributed $5,000. A letter from Roanoke County Administrator Elmer Hodge stating that the Board of Supervisors would consider TAP's request on this date, and his recommendation of approval of the $10,000 contribution allowed us to meet the November 15 deadline with all other necessary funding in place and the Roanoke County contribution tentatively pledged. This is the last piece of the funding puzzle needed to match the federal money and ensure operation of the TLC for the year that begins Dec. 1. Meeting the match will provide the TLC with $324,000 in base operating funds, enabling it to provide its effective program of transitional housing and comprehensive support services to the homeless residents of the Roanoke Valley. Last year the TLC served 274 residents, but turned away another 577. Of those served, nearly 80% obtained income through employment or benefit programs. Fully a third of the residents who left the TLC last year transitioned into stable permanent housing. The base operating cost will enable the TLC to house and serve 35-40 residents daily. An additional $100,000 is required to operate the facility at full capacity of 75 residents per day. However, with the base funding in place, private contributions can be used to provide services to additional residents. We are extremely grateful that Roanoke County has continuously contributed to the operation of the TLC since its opening in 1988. Your contribution of $10,000 at this time is the critical piece to ensure the successful operation of the program for another year. ACTION NO. A-111991-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ 'c~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request for funds for a traffic signal at the intersection of Northside High School Road and Peters Creek Road. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~L.L.rc~-r~rw~-.~~ q~~,~-~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Current estimate for installation of this signal is $100,000. The cost would be shared equally by Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, Virginia Department of Transportation and Kroger Food Stores. BACKGROUND' For the past five years there has been an on-going effort to have a traffic signal installed at the intersection of Northside High School Road and Peters Creek Road. Concerns over the need for this signal have been expressed by Kroger on behalf of its more than 300 employees, the Northside High School and Jr. High School Administrations and P.T.A.'s on behalf of their students, and by the Roanoke County Chief of Police regarding the safety of officers who come and go from the Roanoke County Public Safety Center. A 1986 traffic study indicated that signal was warranted at this location. There have been a number of collisions and near misses since that time. However, despite that, and numerous letters and petitions, no action has yet been taken. Roanoke County Staff has worked with the City of Roanoke, VDOT and Kroger to arrange a joint project. The other entities have agreed to pay their share of the cost. The Roanoke County School Administration has agreed to pay one-half the County portion. Once the project is approved, it is expected to take six to nine months before the signal would be installed. FISCAL IMPACT' The County's share from the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance is $12,500. r . ~-a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that $12,500 be appropriated from the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance to allow this project to proceed. Respectfully submitted, /v . Donnie C. My s Assistant Administrator ACTION Approved (~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) motion to approve $12,500 Eddy Received ( ) from Capital Fund Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc: File Donnie C. Myers, Assistant Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Dr. Bayer Wilson, Superintendent, Schools VOTE No Yes Abs x x x x x ,~ ACTION # A-111991-4 ITEM NUMBER ..L~' J MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Additional Grant of $10,450 and Appropriation to the School Federal Programs Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools has been awarded an additional grant of $10,450 under Chapter 1 of Title I, Elementary and Secondary Education Act, for program improvement. These federal funds have been made available to school divisions who wish to offer remediation or special instruction and materials to assist elementary school children who do not achieve to their expected level. Roanoke County has identified a need for this type of funding which will be used to provide training and retraining of personnel, to develop appropriate curricula and innovative strategies to enhance parental involvement, and to purchase materials and equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: None. 100 percent federally funded with no county matching funds required. Revenue would be recorded to reflect $10,450.00 in the School Federal Programs Fund for 1991- 92. Expenditures would also be recorded. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the additional grant totaling $10,450.00 and appropriation of said amount to the School Federal Programs Fund. ~. eph Kyle, Di ctor of Elmer C. Hodge ederal Programs & esting County Administrator ACTION Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. NickensEddy Denied ( ) motion to approve _ Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) ~ Nickens To _ Robers cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools No VOTE Yes x Abs x X x_ X ~-3 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 24, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND. WHEREAS, application was made for federal program improvement assistance funds under Chapter 1 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to assist elementary school children who do not achieve to their expected level, and WHEREAS, $10,450 in additional funding has been approved, 100 percent federally reimbursable, to provide training and retraining of personnel, to develop appropriate curricula and innovative strategies to enhance parental involvement, and to purchase materials and equipment; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded requests an additional appropriation of $10,450 to the Chapter 1 account in the School Federal Programs Fund. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TEST c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ACTION # A-111991-5 ITEM NUMBER ~' ~ MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Award of $3,000.00 and Request for Appropriation to the School Capital Improvements Fund for Instructional Equipment COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~/' y ~~ ~~e /~L~r-e--ryy- SUMMARY OF INFORMATION For the past several years the General Electric Elfun Society has been very supportive of the school system by making substantial financial awards for individual school projects. The Elfuns on October 14, 1991 presented the school division a check for $3,000 to be applied toward the purchase of a Braille printer which can be attached to a computer. The total cost of the printer is $4,600; the remaining $1,600 will be expended from capital improvements funds for instructional equipment. The printer will be used by a blind Glenvar High student who is learning keyboarding and, with the assistance of a laptop computer, will be able to take notes, print them in Braille and use them as study guides. The printer will also be used by the itinerant vision teacher in preparing tests and other materials for the Glenvar High student and a blind student at Bent Mountain Elementary School. FISCAL Capital fund the IMPACT: Will require a $1,600 expenditure Improvements Fund for Instructional Equipment cost of the printer. from the to totally STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the monetary award and appropriation of funds as requested. Eddie L. Kolb, Director Elmer C. Hodg Pupil Personnel Services County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( x) t on by. y Eddy Denied ( ) motion to approve _ Johnson Received ( ) _ McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Mo i Harr C. Nickens x x x x x ~-~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 24, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND FOR INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT. WHEREAS, the General Electric Elfun Society has awarded the Roanoke County School System $3,000.00 to be applied toward the purchase of a Braille printer that attaches to a computer to be used by and for blind students; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded requests an appropriation of $3,000.00 to the School Capital Improvements Fund for Instructional Equipment to assist with the purchase of a Braille printer. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ,~ .c-~:-r __ _ , C l c r k c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ACTION NO. A-111991-6 ITEM NUMBER J-1" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Audited Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30, 1991 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~f~ -c~'~z~''-~~ ~-~`~'``~ ~ ~?~ 7~i 3 3 Z ohm ~,, _;~=~'4-~t.~G-may ~-f..~'~ -~.t/~-G"~ _~'-rr ,I .~-l ~ ~v ~ // BACKGROUND: On August 27, 1991, staff presented the preliminary financial figures for the year ended June 30, 1991. KPMG Peat Marwick has now completed their independent audit of the County's financial statements for the year. Earlier today the auditors met with the audit committee to discuss the results of the financial statements and the preliminary management letter comments. The printed comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1991 is currently being printed and will be distributed around the first of December. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: On August 27, 1991, we reported that an additional $680,000 would be available to add to the fund balance as a result of actual expenditures being less than budget. During the year end procedure, additional revenues were accrued and the final amount available to add to fund balance is $791,332. In addition, the school preliminary report showed $592,429 available to the schools as a result of expenditures being less than budget. This amount has remained unchanged. Unless otherwise directed, the County money automatically reverts to Unappropriated Fund Balance at year end. The School money reverts to the School Bus Fund. The County School Board met on October 10, 1991 and adopted a resolution for its year end surplus as follows: School Buses $ 350,000 Mason Cove Sewage System 40,000 Traffic Light at Northside High School and Peters Creek Rd. 12,500 Other Capital Needs (Including Roofs) 189,929 Total $ 592,429 1 ~j-5 We are currently reviewing the County revenues for 1991-1992 to date. Because of the sluggish economy we are monitoring the projected budgets for personal property taxes, sales tax and real estate tax. In addition, the State is notifying localities of declines in State aid for education and state-wide sales tax. The revenues will be reviewed in detail in January 1992. At this time we would recommend caution. The Schools have volunteered to delay the purchase of their school buses for a few months until we can get a clearer picture of all the revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends allowing the $791,332 to remain in the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for future budget needs. Staff also recommends approving the School Board resolution with the understanding that they will hold off on the purchase of school buses until this year's revenues are certain. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~. rrn.t,~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Harr ick motion to a , to Eddy x unappropriated balance and thatJohnson x _ 12,500 of the School Board McGraw x surplus be allocated to Nickens x Northside High School traffic Robers x light cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget 2 ~! COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986 $1,584,637 3.16$ Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987 $2,063,493 3.87 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1988 $3,037,141 5.32 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1989 $4,038,318 6.93 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1990 $5,653,746 8.57 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1991 $5,060,731 7.41$ Undesignated Fund Balance at November 19, 1991 $5,060,731 7.23 3 ~...5 O M N C 7 "1 ro 0 ro c ~w .,~ N ~ 00 N Fa >~ 7 U ^ }1 x LI O O C w O N P: C O W ..i O i~ ~. L+ N N a a 7O O U w O fn +> N U C~ I I 1 I I II 1 1 NN 01M W I ~' W I d'd' I O II Ul I I O O O O W I O 1n 1 IL) 00 I M it U I rl I W ~00MM I W c0 I W~ 101 II a I W I .. .. .. , .. .. I I I I >. 1 7 I 1N Nd'li7 I N1 I d'1[1 I O II [-~ 1 a1 I ti01 ^y c00 I OM I CO I CO II ri I U I 01 [0 V' V' cD I O 00 11 1l1 11 II rl ro I Q I I 1~ 1 II Q C I I O N V' N OD I 01 O I CO I [~ II C I I M .--I .--i I O O I 1 II .-1 w l I I ... I I II ~ I _ +1 rl I I I 11 II O 1d I I 000001 I O MCO 100 I O II F N I I 0 0 0 001 I 01 01 M I M M I I I M I N I 0 0 0 000 1 W 1 M I LA N I II C I N I I 1 I II N I 00 1 010001 I c0 MCO I M M 1 II C7 I ro I 1O01n d' 11 Nt0 100 I II 1 7 1 01 O M .-I N 1 cD .^I 47 I O O I II I W I I 1 I II I I O M V' N CO I W .~-1 V' 1 1 1 I II I I M ~--I "I I O 1~ I~ 1 II 1 I I ~ I I II I I I I^ I 11 I 1 NNO)MO I [D .i I u7 V' 101 II ro I 1 O O O O.--i I N S I N M 1 O II C I .-i 1 OJT W MO I'd's I ~ 1 1 c0 I I C I cd I I I I II W I 7 1 1 N N d' 1 1 d' OI 1 u7 1l7 I O II p I~ I ti 01 .~-I O O I 1c7 c0 I .-1 00 11 II C I U I MtD d'd' cD I rl W 11C0 1 N II U} I Q I I I Q I - II I I ONd'N 1 1 N W I 1 1 1 it ro l I M~ .ti I tD cD I I II C I I I ... I 1 II C I w l I I ^^ I^ I II I I 000000 I W N c0 100 I O II .-1 I I 000001 101 It7M 10101 1 II W I +~ I 000001 101 d'M 111 I II H 1 N I I i I it 71 I DO I 010001 I cDMCO 1 NN I II C l ro l 1 0 0117 1 1 0 1 In I N N I II U I C I TO M.--I N I 1 0 In I O 01 I II C7 I W I I I I II I I O Md'N 1 1 1 Od' I cD [0 I II I I M .--I r1 I O 1~ 1 ~-' I II I I I ~ I I II I II 1 N .-i I O II I .-I M 1 II N II t p M M I M I I M O I M I I N Q7 1 I Q7 II 1 M I I M II ^ II ^ I II IL7 'd' O I O II 001 I .--I II M (D fD 1 [D II c0 (D I 01 II IL7 r-I 0 1 1 it O N I 1 II .--I .--I 10 I 1 II u7 d' 1 I II I I II I N N > y N (-I }1 N ~. N N [~ O U O a r N N +~ ~ e c+ ~, i~ o y c v oro ti m k .C N U a ~+ w vm +' m o xo F O f v k N f.1 W U N U] F N td ro N N 7 ro C L. Ul Ul F N G U A U1 N H ttl O x >, 5 0 [a C a a ~ o ~ •~ ca ,~ v a m ~ H o a ~ +~ F c, ro N C N rl N r 0.l ro Lt1 cd ~ a~a^a~ >,ama~> U a m w ~ No oc+o ti~ roo .1 0 o a~ a w ~wro oY a s c. c. rn •~1 a ~ ro y ~ a [a a o oa ~a m a ro•.+ro+~ ^ w a .~ r~ In m 7 0 o ro o m ro oo ~ O rl t0 N N N w U +~ C a1 C 4l •.1 O 01 F. 16 cq N ~ sa a~ q W o Id oo ~ N +1 rn a s ~,~ c c oo m e aa•~I c o v, o rl a o ~ o a rl oo x oo N c ro C 1 Ul r-I N cp •.I ••a DO •^I td •^I W •.I N m a ~ 7~ t+ U N .i roc q a N w 'ti , . O C N N O C ~-1 C ~rl C N N C Ul +~ O N 0.' a .] W C N +I •^I ro A A 5 G1 N ro W •.i .-a ro C N ro fk W U 0.l w a .] Q 4 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Audited Balance at July 1, 1990 7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department 9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User Fees 11/13/90 Allied Signal 11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station 12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds 12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns 12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service 12/18/90 Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station Balance as of June 25, 1991 ~' ~ of General~l~ Amount Fund Expenditures $5,653,756 500,000 (200,000) (85,421) (875,000) (174,886) (347,500) (186,850) (5,000) (9,700) $4,269,399 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 6.25$ Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25 of General Fund expenditures ($68,310,395). 5 ~_5 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 10, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA RESOLUTION REQUESTING ALLOCATION OF THE 1990- 91 YEAR-END BALANCE IN THE SCHOOL OPERATING BUDGET. WHEREAS, the audit of school operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991 indicates a balance of $592,429, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has by resolution allowed the school board to retain the year-end balance in the capital account for the purchase of school buses with the latitude of applying some of the funds to other needs; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests the Board of County Supervisors to retain $350,000 of the year-in surplus in the bus fund; and to transfer $242,429 to the capital fund to purchase land for a new sewage system for Mason's Cove Elementary School (estimated at $40,000), to fund the school board's portion of the cost for installing a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek and Northside High School roads (estimated at $12,500), and to reserve the balance for other needs. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Paul G. Black TESTE~•77 \,% .~.~- y `y , Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt 6 iiiiii~~iii~i~i~i~~ii~~i~~~ii~i~~i~iiii~~~ii~~~~ii~iii~~~~i~i~~iiiii~itiiii~ii AGENDA ITEM NO. -~ - ~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE /f -; ~_ ~, ~. , _ f ,,, 1 _, ,; ~~-~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 10, 1991 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA RESOLUTION REQUESTING ALLOCATION OF THE 1990- 91 YEAR-END BALANCE IN THE SCHOOL OPERATING BUDGET. WHEREAS, the audit of school operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991 indicates a balance of $592,429, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has by resolution allowed the school board to retain the year-end balance in the capital account for the purchase of school buses with the latitude of applying some of the funds to other needs; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests the Board of County Supervisors to retain $350,000 of the year-in surplus in the bus fund; and to transfer $242,429 to the capital fund to purchase land for a new sewage system for Mason's Cove Elementary School (estimated at $40,000), to fund the school board's portion of the cost for installing a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek and Northside High School roads (estimated at $12,500), and to reserve the balance ACTION NO. A-111991-7 ITEM NUMBER ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Amendment to Employee Handbook - Sick Leave Bank COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: `~ ~ ~~l• ~~~ c~~ ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Sick Leave Bank Program for County employees is recommended to provide a loan of sick leave benefits for eligible employees who experience a serious illness or disability. The first 240 hours (30 consecutive workings days) of illness or disability must be covered by an employee's own accumulated leave or leave without pay, prior to utilization of the Sick Leave Bank. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The establishment of a Sick Leave Bank program will provide for a loan of sick leave in the event of a major or protracted illness, after accumulated sick leave and annual leave balances have been exhausted. The establishment of the Sick Leave Bank program has been reviewed by the Internal Support and Operations Team, the Strategic Management Team and the Employee Advisory Committee. Prior to finalizing this program, similar sick leave programs in other municipalities were reviewed. The program recommended for adoption is similar to the Roanoke County Schools Sick Leave Bank program. A Sick Leave Bank program has operated successfully in the school system since July 1, 1982. A proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Employee Handbook is included with this report as Attachment A. Included as Attachment B is the proposed Sick Leave Bank policy referred to in the County Employee Handbook amendment. The proposed amendment will become effective on July 1, 1992, at the beginning of the new fiscal year. This will provide adequate time for payroll programming changes by the Department of Management Information Systems, and for data entry, reporting, ordering of forms and dissemination of information to employees (MIS request memo attached). ~-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Roanoke County Employee Handbook be amended to incorporate the Sick Leave Bank program included as Attachment A of this report. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, D. Keith Cook Elmer C. Hodge Director, Human Resources County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ~ Motion by: Harr C' _ Ni t~kPnS Denied ( ) to api rnvP a ~ amPnc3PC3 b~ ReCelVed ( ) Beard MPmbPrs Referred ( ) To ( ) ----------------- VOTE No Yes Ab Eddy ~ Johnson ~ McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources ~~ D. PROCEDURES CONCERNING USE OF SICK LEAVE BANR BENEFIT 1. The employee must make application for this benefit - it is not automatic. 2. The sick leave bank benefit may be used by an enrolled employee for a major and protracted illness, the duration of which requires the employee to utilize all of his/her accumulated sick leave and annual leave. The benefit is for the enrolled employee only; family illnesses are excluded from coverage. 3. The first 240 hours (30 consecutive working days) of illness or disability must be covered by the employee's own accumulated leave or leave without pay. 4. A member of the bank shall not be permitted to use his or her sick leave bank benefits until all his or her own sick leave and annual leave is depleted. If compensation is received by an employee as the result of an illness or an injury covered under the County's worker's compensation program, at no time shall the employee be permitted to draw more salary income from worker's compensation and the sick leave bank than the employee normally would draw had the employee not been injured or disabled. An employee who is presently disabled from work who has received approval for disability retirement benefits through the Virginia Retirement System or social Security shall not be permitted his or her sick leave bank benefit. 5. A physician's certificate is required before a sick leave bank member can use his or her sick leave bank benefit. This certificate is to be submitted to the Department of Human Resources and must include the employee's name, social security number, and occupation. The physician Amended to must indicate: the nature of the illness or disability, include that the employee is unable to perform any work because secondary job of such illness or disability, the date the employee ceased work, and approximately how long the employee will be unable to return to work. A request for loan of days from the sick leave bank, accompanied by the physician's certificate, must be submitted to the Department of Human Resources on forms provided by the Department of Human Resources. 2 ~•~o 6. A maximum of 360 hours (45 working days) from the bank may be utilized each fiscal year by any one member. Participating members must return to work and must meet the requirements of items 1,3,4 and 5 before again becoming eligible to utilize sick leave bank benefits. If the member suffers a relapse within 30 calendar days due to the same illness or disability which necessitated initial utilization of the bank, the member need not meet another 30-working-day elimination period. 7. Repayment Requirements At the beginning of each fiscal year, following receipt of the loan, the loan recipient shall donate a minimum of 24 hours of sick leave or annual leave to the sick leave bank until the loan has been repaid in full. Upon termination of employment, any balance due the sick leave bank shall be repaid to the sick leave bank from the balance of unused sick leave days. or annual leave E. ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS The members of a bank shall be assessed annually an additional 8 hours of sick leave when that bank is reduced to 800 hours (100 days). Notification of such assessment shall be sent to each member at the time it is determined to be necessary, and the assessment shall be made unless the participant chooses to cease membership in the bank. A member not wishing the assessment may terminate membership in the bank by notifying the Department of Human Resources, in writing, within 30 calendar days from the date of the notice. A member who has no sick leave to contribute at the time of assessment shall be assessed these 8 hours from the first sick leave subsequently accumulated. F. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT Upon termination of employment or withdrawal of membership from the bank, a participating employee shall not be permitted to withdraw his or her contributed hours. Final determination of utilization of the sick leave bank will be at the discretion of the I~tsrna-Y-~vppor~and-9peratsons~ea~ after review of the request by the Director of Human Resources. discretion of County Administrator 10/15/91 ~-~ Attachment B SICK LEAVE BANK A. GENERAL A sick leave bank for Roanoke County employees shall be maintained. The donation of sick leave will not adversely affect the Attendance Award Program. B. MEMBERSHIP Membership shall be voluntary on the part of the employees. C. ENROLLMENT All full time regular employees who have completed their first six months of original employment or re-employment are considered as eligible employees for this program. An eligible employee may enroll by donating 16 hours of his or her accumulated sick leave or annual leave to the bank. In addition, as annual leave credits accumulated may not exceed 240 hours (thirty days) at the end of any fiscal year (June 30), any eligible employee may donate any excess hours over the 240 hour annual leave maximum to the sick leave bank at the end of the fiscal year. Accumulated sick leave or annual leave contributed to the bank must have been earned while in the employment of the County of Roanoke. Enrollment may be accomplished by forwarding a completed Sick Leave Bank Application Form to the Department of Human Resources on forms provided by the Department of Human Resources. The periods of enrollment shall be as follows: 1. An eligible employee may enroll at the time of completion of their first six months of original employment or re- employment. 2. An eligible employee who does not enroll when first eligible (under item 1 above) may do so between any subsequent June 1 to June 30 period by making application on forms provided by the Department of Human Resources. Such an employee must be enrolled in the plan for six months prior to becoming eligible to utilize the benefits of the sick leave bank. The six-month qualification period must expire before the eligibility period commences for benefits relating to a particular illness or disability. 1 D-b M E M O R A N D U M TO: DIANE HYATT COPIES: INTERNAL SERVICES TEAM VICKI BENNINGER FROM: DIANA C WILSON DATE: September 6, 1991 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF SICK LEAVE BANK FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES I WANT TO REQUEST THAT THE SICK LEAVE BANK BE IMPLEMENTED WITH THE NEW FISCAL YEAR. THE FIRST OPEN ENROLLMENT WILL BE FROM JUNE 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1992. THIS FOLLOWS THE POLICY FOR THE YEARLY ENROLLMENT PERIOD. THIS WILL GIVE MY DEPARTMENT ADEQUATE TIME FOR ANALYSIS AND PROGRAMMING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE PROJECT COMPLETED IN TIME FOR DATA ENTRY, REPORTING, ETC. THIS MAY ALSO ALLOW ENOUGH TIME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES AND/OR PAYROLL TO PLAN FOR THE ADDITIONAL FORMS, WORK, ETC. THAT MAY BE NEEDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, PLEASE CALL ME AT 561-8004. ~e Attachment A AMENDMENT TO ROANORE COONTY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK CHAPTER I% B. Sick Leave 8. Sick Leave Bank A Sick Leave Bank is available for eligible employees on a voluntary basis. This program provides for a loan of sick leave in the event of a major or protracted illness, after all accumulated sick leave and annual leave balances have been exhausted. This program will become effective July 1, 1992. For further information refer to the Sick Leave Bank Policy on file in the Department of Human Resources. Amendment #91-05 e _./' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 111991-8 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION 15.1-238 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950 (AS AMENDED), AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A 2.030-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE R. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, including the construction of a water supply system, pump station, and reservoir, has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of Roanoke County. 2. That the project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a long-term water source in Roanoke County. 3. That acquisition of a certain parcel of land, consisting of 2.030 acres, is necessary for construction of the major access road to the reservoir and the pump station. 4. That the parcel of land required for this phase of the project is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney and is more particularly described as follows: All that certain parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474" upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474. The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7. 5. That the fair market value of the property is $4,800.00, which is hereby offered to the property owners for purchase of fee simple, marketable title to the subject parcel by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take possession of such property and commence construction of said water supply system, pump station and reservoir and any other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to the above-described property as provided by law. 7. That a certified copy of this resolution, to be sent by certified mail to Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, on or before November 22, 1991, shall constitute notice to said property owners of the offer to purchase as set forth above and the intent to enter upon and take possession of said property to commence construction, as provided for in Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended). 7. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights, privileges, and provisions as to the vesting of powers in the County under the Virginia General Condemnation Act (§25-46.1, et se ., of the Code of Virginia, 1950, (as amended), and Section 15.1-238, all as made and provided by law. 8. That the County Administrator and the County Attorney are a r hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition through eminent domain proceedings, or otherwise. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney - Certified Copy ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGOLAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Pursuant To Title 25 And Section 15.1- 238 Of The Code Of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), Authorizing The Acquisition Of And Immediate Right of Entry To A 2.030-Acre Parcel of Land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project By Eminent Domain Proceedings COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 4~ ~ ~' BACKGROUND• As part of the Spring Hollow project, a number of properties have been previously acquired. As negotiations for the purchase of these lands progressed, agreements were reached with all landowners except Mr. Davis and Ms. Widney. At that time, staff did not pursue acquisition through eminent domain proceedings since the financing of the project had not been approved by the Board. Subsequent to the financing approval, the staff contacted the owners and has been unable to reach an agreeable settlement. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The subject property is necessary for the Spring Hollow Reservoir project, in order to provide the main access to the reservoir and the pump station. This parcel of land is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, and is more particularly described as follows: All that certain parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474" upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph H. D • ~j Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474. The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7. In an effort to reach a settlement with the owners, a written offer of $4,000.00 has been extended to the property owners; the owners have made a verbal counter-offer of $20,000.00 for purchase of the property by the County. Consequently, Staff feels that it is necessary at this time to go forward with eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of project construction as previously directed by the Board. Staff has obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value for the proposed acquisition from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRPA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. The appraiser's opinion is that the estimated market value of the proposed acquisition is $2,358.30 per acre. Based upon the surveyed acreage of 2.030, the estimated fair market value of the property is $4,787.35, rounded to $4,800.00. FISCAL IMPACT' The appraised value of Hollow account along with awards made by the court. ALTERNATIVES' $4, 800.00 would be paid from the Spring all related court costs and additional Funds are available from Bond proceeds. 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of and immediate right of entry to the 2.030-acre parcel of land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney by eminent domain proceedings. 2. Authorize County staff to accept the offer of $20,000 made by the owners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt a resolution pursuant to Title 25 and Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), and authorize the County Administrator and the County Attorney to take such steps as may be necessary to acquire the Davis-Widney property, together with all rights incident thereto, by eminent domain proceedings. SUBMI D BY: J n R. bbard, P. . Assistan County Administrator APPROVED: ~a , /~~~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~' 1 Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers No Yes Abs Q i..,ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z~ti ~ Q' e c S = ~ `-~ V ~ J ~~o~ ~ v /~ ` Oti ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ .C1. ~ O~ti'L ~ ' A= 1 B'14'OS" R= 1265.62 T= ?03.11 O ~ ~hh ,tit ~1 ~ f ~ /h,~`E ~~~ TAX'~73.00-1-6 //// PROPERTY OP ~' TFIE g OARn OG SUPER V /SOR4 tib (ROn P(N 5ET OF ROANOKE CO. V/R4IN/A l5'ON DINE 0A FROM IjOR. (1. ff. 1251 1'G.1365 '~ _ s ` q0 s~ABAnnoNEo y WATE4 DINE 19'x ?9' ME lAl' 5lfEn m c'> s_ BRG.105~69'35'13°W •~..~ ~~~1~~1 G. ~ 30 ,~. Q~iRE~! CHD. 401.09 2a' p2 n• 13. (0 3 5 Pf1, 47¢ I 3) J IRON PIN 5ET~6~, ~(0 Q~~ i 2 P~P65 ~ ~~ z 13RANCN fYti~,tb'~. VIp lQ`~~/a0 ~ ~ ~ p~v ~~ o ,z s ~ .,~., ° N ~ ~~ G~ i r Cf/NETAgV o ~ O,`~~G w l~ ° 3 9'1.2' OR O`~ CJ VV vPR RI ~ &7 tµON / NORFO6 K ~ 50UTNERN ~ eRro4e ~r74 ~ ~ BaANGK ~ i NOTES: 1. THIS PUT lS BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. Z. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THIS PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. 3. IRON PINS SET AS SHOWN. 4. THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN A 100 YEAR FL000 BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION !S BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF FL000 INSURANCE RATE AIAP ,510190 0075 A, ZONE A-12, ANO HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITH ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. PLAT SHOWING 2.030 AC. TRACT OF LAND (TAX #73.00-1 -7) BEING CONVEYED TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ~yzx of SUPERVISORS ~~ Dl "P 11 , B Y 8,~EE 7, JOSEPH H. DAMS & RENDERS N, JR. a 6 ~~~~~' ~ SUZANNE WIDNEY ' I No. 1480 (FORMERLY SUZANNE K. DAMS) t ~ oq~ CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~~", SURvD' ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: 1q- NOVEMBER 1991 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES P. C , . ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. #91-478 ~~7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION 15.1-238 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950 (AS AMENDED), AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A 2.030-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE K. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, including the construction of a water supply system, pump station, and reservoir, has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of Roanoke County. 2. That the project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a long-term water source in Roanoke County. 3. That acquisition of a certain parcel of land, consisting of 2.030 acres, is necessary for construction of the major access road to the reservoir and the pump station. 4. That the parcel of land required for this phase of the project is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney and is more particularly described as follows: All that certain parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474" upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474. The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7. ~-7 5. That the fair market value of the property is $4,800.00, which is hereby offered to the property owners for purchase of fee simple, marketable title to the subject parcel by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take possession of such property and commence construction of said water supply system, pump station and reservoir and any other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to the above-described property as provided by law. 7. That a certified copy of this resolution, to be sent by certified mail to Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, on or before November 22, 1991, shall constitute notice to said property owners of the offer to purchase as set forth above and the intent to enter upon and take possession of said property to commence construction, as provided for in Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended). 7. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights, privileges, and provisions as to the vesting of powers in the County under the Virginia General Condemnation Act (§25-46.1, et sea., of the Code of Virginia, 1950, (as amended), and Section 15.1-238, all as made and provided by law. 8. That the County Administrator and the County Attorney are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions ~~ as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition through eminent domain proceedings, or otherwise. c:\wp51 \agenda\realeat\davis. Aso fr cn~r~ . 15 ~ ) ~ 8 l ~~~-~ , '~~ ~ ~~t~.bl~~c~ ~~C 1~ ~- ~~~l~C~'\ L-~~ is ~~ ~~Ci ~~ ~ ~) ~ ~~.~<~ . ~~~~ ~ 3-~_ ~ ~ - C~ `C' c ~ `~ ~ t~~; ~ ~-~ ~1 J CZ 17 L~ l 1. ~.~ C~ S ~ ~ y~~ c;~ C~ ~~ Li ~ ~ E~ \:. r vac - ~--- ~- ~, c.~~~~.~ `~ a 9~~, ='~ ~t. :,,,,~ ~~'~ F-, `-.: /. ~, ~ c- ~.~ .<,.; ..~ ACTION # A-111991-9 ITEM NUMBER ~"' (~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Amend Engineering Services Agreement with Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow Construction Management COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~.-,~ BACKGROUND' In October of 1984, the County entered into an agreement of engineering services for Spring Hollow Reservoir. Those services included design and construction management. The agreement identified a completion date of August 1988 (3.6 years). With the delays in permitting and financing approvals, the project will now be completed in May of 1994. Along with cost increases of the delay, inspection services have increased with the RCC method of construction. The RCC method requires additional quality control measures that add to the work effort. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The staff has negotiated a new fee that reflects the cost increases of personnel and overhead during the 6-year delay and the additional quality control and inspection work required with the RCC dam. A negotiated "cost not to exceed" fee of $1,800,000 has been agreed upon by staff and Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern. This fee will include all work required by HSMM, their subcontractors, and all testing services during the construction phase of the project. Costs will be monitored by staff to help control actual costs. Payments will be made only for work performed up to the "not to exceed" amount. ~-S FISCAL IMPACT• Funds are available from Bond proceeds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary amendment to the Engineering Services Agreement with Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ `~ ~~ ohn R. bbard, P.L. Elmer C. Hodge Assistan County Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator ACTION NO. A-111991-10 ITEM NUMBER ~'"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Revised Capital Improvement Program: Review Process and Calendar of Events COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : f~ ~ryLrns~ ~'~ `~'" "~ C BACKGROUND• The Capital Improvement Program: FY 1992-1996 was the first five year CIP approved by the Board of Supervisors since FY 1986-1987. Each year, it is the County's intention to reevaluate and update the CIP, extending the useful life of the County's capital planning into the future. The CIP is prepared by the Department of Management and Budget in conjunction with the Department of Planning and Zoning. Its implementation rests with the Board of Supervisors through its adoption of the CIP and incorporation of projects annually in the County's capital budget. Thus, an item's inclusion in the CIP does not necessarily indicate a funding commitment by the governing body. With the development of the "team approach" to decision making, staff submitted the CIP process to the Facilities Management Team for review. Based upon the Team's evaluation of the criteria and process used in FY 1991-1992 and based upon a survey of nine other Virginia counties, the Facilities Management Team prepared for Board approval, a report of their recommended changes to the CIP process. The survey of other Virginia counties is attached for your review. Staff believes these recommendations will better structure the CIP review process, and will provide the necessary guidance for those County Departments that submit CIP projects. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Facilities Management Team CIP recommendations are as follows: ~D-9 1. A ten member CIP Review Committee would be established to review and rank all CIP projects submitted by the department directors. It is proposed that the Review Committee would be comprised of the Directors of Budget and Planning, a representative of each of the five "Teams", an Assistant county Administrator, a school Hoard Representative, and an Employee Advisory Committee member. The Departments of Planning and Hudget would provide staff support for the Committee. The Facilities Management Team believes that the Review Committee approach is in keeping with the new organizational structure and will increase representation, ownership and support in the CIP process. 2. The CIP period should remain at five years. The five-year time horizon seems to be typical among the jurisdictions surveyed. 3. The definition of a "capital project" for inclusion in the CIP would change from $50, 000 and a seven year life, to $25, 000 and a seven year life. The Team interpret's this definition to mean that no grouping of similar projects would be allowed to meet the $25,000 minimum. Each project must be evaluated individually based upon its own merits. The CIP Review Committee would evaluate the possibility of grouping similar projects on a case-by-case basis. Also, capital projects submitted for inclusion in the CIP would not be submitted in the departmental operating budget. Only capital projects valued at less than $25,000 would be funded within target. CIP projects would be approved as a package and funded through the Capital Fund for monitoring purposes. 4. Repair and maintenance items and vehicle replacements would continue to be eligible for inclusion in the CIP. It was the consensus of the Facilities Management Team that routine maintenance and repair items should not normally be funded through a CIP. However, given the magnitude of the County's maintenance and repair needs, the Team believed that, for now, the CIP is the only feasible way of setting priorities for, and the funding of these needed improvements. It was also the consensus of the Team that a vehicle replacement policy should be developed in the future. However, because of the economic downturn and the County's current 2 ~5 inability to fund a vehicle replacement account, vehicle replacements over $25,000 in value should continue to be included in the CIP process. 5. New CIP projects suet be subaitted for funding no earlier than the third year of the CIP. Bsaeptions would be allowed for emergencies. In FY 1991-1992, projects were submitted for funding in any of the five CIP years. Requiring that projects be submitted no earlier than the third year forces departments to think long- range when evaluating their capital needs. The survey of other Virginia localities indicated that approximately one-half of those surveyed had similar requirements. 6. That a two-tier ranking system be utilised to evaluate eligible CIP projects. The first ranking would use a qualitative approach (urgent, essential, necessary, etc.). These definitions can be found on page 6 of this report. The second ranking would be numerical or quantitative and would prioritise the projects as first, second, third, etc. under each of the qualitative headings based on its numerical scoring. All but one of the localities surveyed, currently uses the qualitative approach. One locality is considering a change to a quantitative method, but has not yet done so. If the two-tiered ranking system is approved, the quantitative ranking methodology would need to be developed by the Facilities Management Team and reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff would anticipate bringing the proposed methodology to the Board for approval within 45 days. 7. Recommend that the Board approve the attached CIP calendar for FY 1992-1993. This proposed calendar of events corresponds to the Budget calendar so that capital funding decisions can be made in conjunction with the normal budget process. FISCAL IMPACT• None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the revised CIP process and proposed calendar of events as prepared by the Facilities Management Team. 3 ~-y Respectfully submitted, Reta R. Busher Director, Management and Budget Approved by, ~~ ~,~ Elmer C. odge County Administrator -~ Terrance L. Harringto Director, Planning a Zoning ACTION Approved (x ) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Denied ( ) motion to approve Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens Robers cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Terrance Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning VOTE No Yes Abs x x x x x 4 ~-9 O Q 34 d W I U < n rZ O _Z ¢ ' ~ ' 0 ao v ~, i Z O oC • ~yQ 6 D V w ~ ~ ~ ~ W U W Qy Z Y ~ oy J (l J ~ Q (s = ¢ Z ~ O ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ Wp< W O W ~ aG= ` ~ mm d Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ p W W ~ ~ Z 8 ~ ~ Z ~ `~ ~ W Z ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ rC ` ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ Y~ ~ ~ 2 W Z N (~ ~> ~ Z 5 ~ W N O Z ~ Z~ ~ m 7 a s t1_ O~ Z~ ~ LLl ~ ¢ 2 2~ ~ U T V~ ~ j VVV. y~~ 10y IGGGWy _ 1 ~iJ W Q Z~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 1y 00 _~ d ~ ~ vV ` m z 4. 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ W ~ o f ~ W W W 3 ~ W~ 7 W ~~ ~ ~~ ~1 YU O W ~ g ~~~~ N 8 ~Z~ 6 ~ Z i 2 Z W J ~ J ~_~~ ~ 2 2 2 Z_ 6 N d Z i ~~' z ~ O = W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ W ~ p ~ 8 Q Q ' Q R Q t O g ~$ W /~ g F d NS 7{ _a • Y Q M W V Z OJ Q x~ 1~ ~ ~ Z Z V a V ~ Z = O Q~ < 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ W W • > Y > ~ ~ ~ T O F r ~ W `~ J Z J W A 2 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEFINITION OF RANKINGS FY 1992-93 Urgent Projects (U) Projects that cannot reasonably be postponed; projects that would remedy a condition dangerous to public health, welfare, or safety; projects required to maintain a critically needed departmental program; projects needed to meet an emergency situation. Essential Projects (E) Projects required to complete or make fully usable a major public improvement; projects required to maintain a minimum standard as part of a continuing departmental program; projects for which outside funds for over 65 percent of the costs are available for only a limited period. Necessary Projects (N) Projects that should be carried out within a few years to meet clearly demonstrated anticipated needs; projects designated for replacement of unsatisfactory or obsolete facilities; projects designated for remodeling for continued use. Desirable Projects (D) Adequately planned projects needed for the expansion of current departmental programs; projects designed to initiate new programs that are considered proper for a progressive community in competition with other communities; projects for the conversion of existing facilities to other uses. Acceptable Projects (A) Adequately planned projects that could be used for ideal operations, but that can be postponed without detriment to present operations if budget reductions are necessary. Deferrable Projects (DEF) Projects that are definitely recommended for postponement or elimination from immediate consideration in the current capital program since they are questionable in terms of overall needs, adequate planning, or proper timing. 6 D-9 11/19/91 COIIl~iTY OF ROANOEB PROP088D CALENDAR OF BVS~i'P8 FY1993-1997 CAPITAL IKPROV8M8NT PROGRAM FY1992-93 Date Activity November 19, 1991 Present proposed CIP Process to Board of Supervisors. November 29, 1991 January 6, 1992 January, 1992 February, 1992 March, 1992 April, 1992 Distribute CIP forms and instructions to Department Directors and Constitutional Officers. CIP Project Request Forms submitted to Department of Management and Budget. Board of Supervisors to set CIP priorities for FY1992-93. CIP Review Committee (Taskforce, Team) to review CIP Project Requests for accuracy, completeness and rank. Present draft CIP to Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to hold Public Hearings on CIP. May, 1992 Adopt CIP for FY1993-FY1997. 7 A-111991-11 Action Number Item Number -~° ~ [.,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Parking Needs at Roanoke County Courthouse and Jail COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~/~ U~-ti~~uy :%~~6~r ~~ ~' ~2:.cl-d-G~' ~-'"U{ .~CZ.[,~C~ t'a-'~-~'d~ ---Z.u~e~~ ,,'' v~ ./ BACKGROUND: Since construction of the County Jail and the Courthouse in the same block of East Main Street in Salem, the lack of parking space has been a problem, for employees and for those with business to transact in those buildings. The few spaces at the rear of the Jail are reserved for various court officers and judges. To the east, around the small office building occupied by Sheriff Kavanaugh, there is only very limited space that can be used for parking. Until recently, most of the overflow parking was accommodated on paved areas surrounding a Getty Mart and a vacant restaurant on the north side of Main Street, across Thompson Memorial Drive from the County property. The Getty Mart owners have now purchased the vacant restaurant, which will be razed to allow expansion of the Getty Mart and which will eliminate the extra parking space. William Watts is the owner of a 0.68-acre tract bounded by East Main Street, Craig Avenue, Clay Street, and the Getty Mart property (see plat attached). He is not willing to sell the land, but rie will give the County first option on leasing his lot, which could be used for parking. If Roanoke County does not lease it, he will lease to Allright Parking. There is no other parking space of adequate size within reasonable walking distance of these County facilities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The need for parking space for the Sheriff's Office and the Courthouse/Jail complex is very real. In addition to parking for employees, space to park is needed for the citizens, prisoners' families, lawyers, witnesses, jurors, etc. who must visit these buildings and for the State Troopers, County Police, and other law enforcement officers who must appear in court. The employees in these facilities feel that they are entitled to free parking because no other group of County employees must pay to park. RECOMMENDATION: Preliminary negotiations with Mr. Watts indicate he would lease his lot to the County for around $735 a month, or $8,820 annually. Since July, 1990, the County's General District and Circuit Courts have -2- ~-~r~ been collecting a $2 fee on each of their criminal and traffic cases, which money is to be used solely for construction, renovation, or maintenance of courthouse or jail and court-related facilities, as provided in §14.1-133.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. As governing body, the Supervisors approve disbursement of these funds. Annual revenue from this source has been around $24,800. I believe that lease of the Watts property in order to provide parking for the Courthouse/Jail complex could be considered "maintenance of a court-related facility" and would be a proper expenditure of this reserve fund. I recommend that the County Administrator be directed to proceed with negotiations for a long-term lease with Mr. Watts, at a cost not to exceed the figure mentioned herein, and that the County Attorney be directed to prepare the ordinance required in order for the County to enter into such lease. FISCAL IMPACT: The lease and upkeep of this parking lot will become an annual financial obligation which, it is anticipated, can be met from revenues generated by the special fee collected by the County's General District and Circuit Courts. An appropriation resolution will be prepared for your consideration along with the ordinance authorizing a lease agreement. Respectfully submitted, 4~J E mer C. Hodg County Administrator A C T I O N Approved (x) Motion by: Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson motion to Received ( ) approve Referred to cc; File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Sheriff Kavanaugh Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, Circuit Court Theresa Childress, Clerk, General District Peggy Gray, Clerk, Family Court G. O. Clemens, Chief Judge, Circuit Court Edward S. Kidd, Jr., Chief Judge, General Joseph M. Clarke, II, Chief Judge, Family McGraw Nickens Eddy Johnson Robers Court V O T E Yes No x _ X x x X Abs District Court Court - ~ ~ '~a~~~~s N~ ''~im- ^D , I ~ ~. I e~ h~ o~ :~ V 0 i __ __ . N O. G 80 ,4 C,P ~.S t h (5~ P. M fo,~t n ~'1 '~ '^ ti ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ m • t~ ~C O( B p ~ ~ W „~ T ti hey 31 c.ts' \ u Q . ~ N a ~ ,~ a 0 4 ~ ~ ~ S¢ O ~ 3G.~j o /0.00 /. W ~~ o ''' ~ ~~~ N ~ V 'ti • Sa 4 • ~ 2 Ol d-33_-- ~577'43~~ :~&- ~3c~f NJ,q/N STREET -EAST PLAT nF SU.PVEy ~``~- `1//LL/!-~M lNI~TTS ~ ti, ~LT(f ~ f N. 9. ZG 8 ,/n9. N~•/4125 OF P,QOPERTY nN M.9/N ST,2EET- EAST of ~• ~ ~ AP:Q/L 3. /974 BET['VEEN ,L 1 Tf/OMPSON ~IEMgR/yL L~,?/VE ~ , NERE.By CEaT/fy TH~oTTN/S 'G^' C.eA/G AVE. ¢ CLAY STQEET C,1;,~~ DlCR Z rLAT Of suave- Is cnaRECT .$19LEM YlR6/N/A S i 1 - 'V i • ~ 9r: oovin ns cK ,! ASSncnw~~s i I ~ ;` ~ ~ ENGiNFEK S ,f S[/.QVEyO.QS I ',~~~~ I G2a~ ~.~iTt~= APP/L 3 /97¢ .SCi9~ E ~ /•• - 30~ i - •r.,~ ~ ---- - •-- - -...... W n\ G ~r -~ Q C~ ~Q C ~ Q S~ ~ M .C ~ q m c ~ N~ `~ v A ~1 P N `.1' .~+ ry ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ N M ~ C,~qy STREET I12.3a 77' 3/'E.-` /01.32 N N.1 = /9'w• ' - . 98.08 8.53 v q TAN. =.9.¢¢ ; o ARc`/6.f7 ~ h "` ,QAD. - /2.5~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 6c. Q6' n1 F owceN.Wb I 48.9' r.6" 1 W ~ / - srn.vy k h o 1 ~ Bc~iGnilvG ~~ n M j ~ O2 ~o~ I ~r ~~ 4S~,f 71' ' /.6~ I ~, I I,7• ~ q, s' Rr'OF OVERHANG JJ D. 789 ,4 cR Fs ?n,Q~ ~ ~- ~~ --~- 1 a. I ZI /-sr~QY Ii ZI ~L~ ~ BQ/CK ~ BUILDING ~ ~ Ij I ~ C 4.3~ 1C I ei /•~' `+~~` ~° OI ~nNC. WA !~ rr ~ ~~ ~-~ -.-- ~ 1 0 r r ~' N •r °' 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~" ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for December 17, 1991. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 3.59 acres from Neighborhood Conservation to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a Special Exception Permit to construct an office to be used in conjunction with the manufacturing and warehousing operation, located at the northwest corner of Enon and Walrond Drive, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of James C. Wilson. 2. An ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair facility, located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Vito DeMonte. 3. An ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to operate a used household appliances shop, located at 1806 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District upon the petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr. G~-3 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for December 17, 1991. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~ Y1 .~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs G-I Date Rec.: Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY LAND IISE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Whorley W. Sink Phone: 703-366-7942 Address : 7802 Enon Drive, Roanoke. VA 24019 2. Applicant's Name: James C. Wi Ison Phone: _703-362-3657 Address: P. O. Box 7311, Roanoke, Virainia 24019 3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Enon and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond Tax Map Number(s) : Part of 27.06-3-4 27 06-3-9 27 06-3-7 and 27 06-3-6 4. Magisterial District: Hol I ins 5. Size of Property: 3.59 acres more or less 6. Existing Zoning: R-1 7. Existing Land Uses: Vacant and res ident is I with garage apartrrpnt 8. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighborhood conservation 9. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal industrial 10. The Following Items Must IBe Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete. X Letter of Application X Vicinity Map X Statement of Justification (Please complete below.) ;( Application Fee X List of Adjacent Owners il. Please explain, in detail, how this request conforms to the Land Use Determinants of the Roanoke County Comprehensive P1 an: 1. The area is one in which industry has historically developed. 2. There are existing industrial zonir~ areas immediately adjacent. 3. The topography is generally flat or gently sloping allowing for reasonable development. 4. ll~e property is outside the flood plain. 5. Resources are not threatened. 6. Utilities are availat3le. ~ LnR OFFICCS ~ ~ ' ~ OSTERHOIIDT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE n PROFESSIONAL CORPORnTION 1919 ELECTRIC ROnD, S W CHARLES H.OSTERH0007 P O BOX 20068 TELEPHONE MICHAEL S. FERGVSON ROANOKE VIRGINIA 703-'7'-"°' EDWARD A. NATT , MICHAEL J. AHERON 24OI V FAX NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703.774-096+ MARK D. KIOO October 29, 1991 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Request for Land Use Plan Amendment Gentlemen: This is to advise that our firm represents James C. Wilson who has petitioned the Board of Supervisors to rezone a parcel of land situate in North County and described in the attached Land Use Plan Amendment Application. Mr. Wilson intends to lease the land to Dragon Corporation for a future expansion for office and warehousing for that corporation. In order to accomplish the above, and to be consistent with the County's comprehensive plan, the property needs to be reclassified from neighborhood conservation to principal industrial. It is felt that, because of the nature of the surrounding properties, this proposed change will have very little effect on the surrounding area. The surrounding area is basically principal industrial and commercial in nature. The justification for the amendment using land use determinants is set for on the attached Application. It is respectfully requested that the Board of Supervisors approve this land use plan amendment. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. Edward A. Natt EAN/dle Enclosures ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION j, Case No.:____-- Ord. No. r ~~ ~~ ~f 1. Ovner's Name: Whorley W. Sink Phone: 703-366-7992 Address: 7802 Eason Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019 2. Applicant's Name: James C. wiison Phone: 703-362-3657 Address : P• ~• Box 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019 3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Eason and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond Tax Map Number(s) : Part of 27.06-3-4, 27.06-3-9, 27.06-3-7 and 27.06-3-6. 4. Magisterial District: 5. Size of Property: Hollins 3.59 acres, more or Tess 6. Existing Zoning: R-1 Existing Land Use: vacant and residential with garage ap artment 7. Proposed Zoning: NI-1 with special exception for_off.ice use in M-1, if necessary Proposed Land Use: off ice txii IdinaP and warehouse 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighs t~orhood C~n~ervation and Principal (r~dustrial. 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes X No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning ' Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ~~ -approximately $30,000.00 - approxima e y 'completion 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: X Letter of Application X Concept Plan ~_ Metes and Bounds Description -~- List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~- Vicinity Map ~_ Application Fee ~- Written Proffers ~_ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature--~tLz..~ ~ ~V~; _~~,,r-- Date ~~\2.3.~..° ~ L10. ~~ffICES ~~ OSTERHO~DT, FERGIISON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE A PROFE)SIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOU DT MIG HAEL S. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W P O BOX 20068 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 October 24, 1991 of Roanoke County Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Sirs: TELEPHONE Boa-»~- I I O ~~~ FAX NO. ~i 7 096' ' 1 ocr ,~ 19 1~~' 91 pl.~k;i~lalJt+K, Zaiij,;,1G ~, ~yy W~.~r1Eih~j This letter is in support of the rezoning request of James C. Wilson to rezone property situate at the intersection of Walrond Drive and Enon Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District from Residential District R-1 to Industrial District M-1 with an additional request for a special exception for office use in M-1, if such is necessary. As the Board is aware, Dragon Corporation is presently located in Roanoke County on property immediately adjacent to the subject property. The business needs to enlarge its facilities, both in the area of office space and in warehouse space.. The proposed office expansion is necessary immediately. The first phase of the warehouse expansion containing approximately 24,000 square feet is to be undertaken in the near future and a second addition is proposed containing an additional 24,000 square feet of warehousing space for sometime in the future. This rezoning request would enable the above to be permitted under the provisions of the ordinance. As stated above, the immediate needs include an office facility of approximately 5,500 square feet and a 24,000 square fcot warehouse. These additions are showr_ on the concept plan prepared by Ernie Rose, Architects, Inc., which is submitted with and made a condition of the rezoning request. The concept plan also shows a second future warehouse addition of approximately 24,000 square feet. The site plan also includes the necessary screening and buffering to comply with the provisions of the county ordinance as well as the necessary parking spaces. Since the project will include truck traffic, a sufficient area within the property is reserved for truck movement. Also, the ingress and egress are designed with the truck movement in mind. We would respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors approve this request pursuant to the provisions of the County G- ordinance. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, MATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~a~~ Edward A. Natt EAN/dle F ROANOKE COUNTY '' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION LSE 1. :,policant's Nam:~: James C. Wilson G-~ p:.~,~,~ 703-362-3657 Address: P. O. Box 7311 Roanoke, Virginia Zip: 24019 2. Property owner's name Whorley W. Sink Address: 7802 Enon Drive Phone: 703-366-7992 Roanoke, VA Zip; 24019 3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Er~on and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond Size of property 3.59 acre$cresrsge~t. Size of proposed special exception use 3.59 acres moreaco~'e~.ft. Part of 27.06-3-4,27.06-3-9 4. Tax Map #: _ _ _ _ Old Tax Map #: 5. Zcning Classification: R-1 6. Magisterial District Location: Hol I ins 7. Existing Land Use• Vacant and residential with garage apartment 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: Construction of approximate 5,500 square foot office in N4-1 District to be used in conjunction with manufacturing a ware ousing ope a i 9. Comprehe nsive Plan Designation: Neighborhood Conservation and Principal ' sal 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Value of Land A~~ab~ly `helve of Proposed Buildings approximately 500,000 at completion Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed 11. Check Completed Items: X 8~" x 11" plot plan X Consultation _~ List of adjacent property owners X Letter of Application %~ Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage a:~d refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport $40 All other Special Exception Uses 12. Date of Application: Qctober 24, 1991 13. Applicant's Signatures J\pN„~,~ "~~~~n U•,. nay O - ./ i ~~ t Written Proffers - Petition of James C. Wilson October 8, 1991 The undersigned does hereby voluntarily proffer the following conditions in connection with the above rezoning. 1. That the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Ernie Rose, Architects, Inc.. C~~~~vR~ Whor~ley Sink ~~ '~, . James__~ Wilson z w a O w w Q W ~ ~ Z Q Z~ w °Z ~~ C!~ 3 0 O " ~~.'' CJ Y ON ~O ~" ~ O a ;~ Q iq ~~ _ ~ e ~ -_ ~ ~~ ~_ „~ ~~ ~ m K ,- ,; ~~ ~~ ~Q ~~, .n .~m ~ y c ~ i ~ 3 ~ ~ ~- e ~~ ~~~ _n ~~~, _ _` ~aa~; `\ ` __,~ ~s v,;~, , ~ ~ `\ ~~ ~ ~ G-I ~~ ani~Q uou3 ROAIAORE COONTY UTILITY DEPARTMEN? APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date Name Of AppliCant~ James C. Wilson phone 703-362-3657 Addzess of Applicant_ P. O. Sox 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019 Name of Developer James C. Wilson Phone 703-362-3657 Address of Developer P. O. Sox 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019 Name of Design Engineez Ernie Rose Phone 804-747-1305 Address of Design Engineer 4192 Innslake Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23060 Name of Contact Person James C. Wi Ison Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units ()3e specific) approximately One story office buildiru~ containinq~5,500 square feet with an adjoining one story warehouse containing 24,000 ~c~uare feet and a future addition containing 24,000 square feet.--site covera~.~e being 51.717. ~' Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) : Approximately 3.59 acres beginning at the Northwest corner of Enon S Walrond Drive fronting Walrond a ~ corner of Nanspile property thence parallel that line to Enon Drive and from that point of beginning. Size of proposed development in acres: 3.59 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No _~_ Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) ~, ~~ -~" 8' ature of Applicant ~ ~ ~ '- ~ _ 1 ~, ~ , ~ ~. m ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~, _ ~ - ~ ''~ '4 ~~ ~~ - - - 1- ,, ; i , -~ - • ~- ;F l} i ~ ~ ~' _ ~ _ ~ Q ? ~ %~ o __ ,, ( , ~ / ,. ~` ~ ` ` , I .. ~ w \~~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~, l ~ •~ \` ~ - ,~ ~ ~ % _ ~1' l w~ ~ \ 1 p O ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Et• IN -~OT~1~ _; QLE ~~~ ~ ~ J ~ _ tE NOUsiNG ! ~ - ~ '~ ~ CONT LR ~r I ( ~ ~ i' otis o~ __ ~~ / S ~ GR p 8~qs N ~,~~ 1~ ~ _ ~~~~ CEO _ -1 S _,'! ~` _ `r ~~.. ~ p ~~4 4:.STaY~LAyE L 1NATf ~Y M ~-~. - o . o ~ ,. -- ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1~ - ` 1\ / I 0 N, 0 ~, .. • ~~ i { ~ ,~ ' " ,~ ~ ~ ( w too /~~ _ _ ~ P Q'~ \ I / \ A ~; / - u ~ o' ~ } 4-Z9-10 ~ l .. CA . ~ '''' a ~ 1 ) ~~y~9-e o ! o ~ > _ r ~ 4 T A ~ - 1~ ~ -fit 1 J ~ ~ 'Y ~ ~ r ~-~ / 1A ~ ~ ~R~•: ~''~'1~ 1. ~ o ~ 9^-10 I 1 'Mi5 -~- ,W1$ FiM4MCE0 iN •~ T ~. ~ •} P ~ `~~' ~ -hN~ RMT ~ROr ~~~' MOUS~MG, ~~ ~ ` ' V \ ~ til r M „~*~ROV~S~ JOR 1 ~ V- I ~'p -~~aa .. ~ ~ Cam.. '~1 ~ ~ , ~~6 AGT Oi ~95Y 1f aENOEO } .~ R o . ~ ~ ' ~ fi' ~ / / 1 I ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~yRyR}.a.,1. 4'k ~~i: i'~iQ~:Yw: -_ .~I.tlaD'~l!1A.'4a."t:. .':^'L ~ ~ ~, ~... . ~ n ~ N ~a /~ ~ . - ... a ~ ~ ~... ~ a.. , . i.~+~t~.K ~i ~ ~ F COMMUNI71'SBRVICl~S James C. Wilson /MIII1RVl~I/1PA~IR111'l' R-1 to F4_1 Date Rec.:_ Received By: Case No.: _ Ord. No.. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Robert C. Bell Phone: 981-0353 Address: c/o R. Calvin Bell, 517 Walnut Ave., S.F.., Roanoke, VA 24014 2. Applicant's Name: Vito DeMonte Phone:(804)?_37-3111 Address: 3725 Wards Road, Lynchburg, Virginia 24502 3. Location of Property: 4037 Electric Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Tax Map Number(s): 87.07-1-39; 87.07-1-40; 87.07-1-41 4. Magisterial District: Cave Sprin 5. Size of Property: 2.43 acres 6. Existing Zoning:B-2 General Commercial District with conditions Existing Land Use: Unoccupied Building, formerly new automobile dealership; B- General Commercial District,( s to Dart) and 7. Proposed Zoning: M-~ Light Industrial District wit~i conditions l~ew auto dealership (as to dart); Proposed Land Use: auto collision rep ~r f il, ~ s o _a r_), 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Core 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes X No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of tte Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: X Letter of Application X Concept Plar, X Metes and Bounds Description X List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) X Vicinity MaF X Application Fee X Written Prof°ers Water and Sewer Application (If Applica~le) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Or Owner' s A ent • ~ • Purchaser, , ;' ~ Ro er C. Bell t ~ ~~ Signature B ~ ~ ~ ~., Date ~d . Calvin ell, his attorney-in- act Vito Monte • B - - -~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 2.43-acre parcel of land at ) 4037 Electric Road, S. W. ) PETITION OF Roanoke County Tax Parcels ) VITO DEMONTE 87.07-1-39, 87.07-1-40, 87.07-1-41 ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, Vito DeMonte ("DeMonte"), files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to show the following: 1) DeMonte has contracted to purchase the referenced parcel of land. 2) Robert C. Bell, the owner of the land, has consented to this petition and related application. 3) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-2 General Commercial District, subject to proffered conditions. 4) The property is designated "Core" in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 5) The 2.43-acre tract is depicted on Exhibit A. DeMonte desires that the portion of the property situated north of the broken line identified as "zoning line" be B-2 General Commercial District, subject to no proffered conditions, and that the remaining portion of the property (that is, south of Wetherington the "zoning line" ) be rezoned to M-1, Light Industrial District, ~~ Melchicxuia subject to the conditions proffered with this petition. c-a 6. The parcel for which rezoning is sought is more fully described in Exhibit B attached hereto. WHEREFORE, DeMonte respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 5. FURTHER, DeMonte further requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Vito De onte Counsel for e itioner Vito DeMonte c/o Donald L. Wetherington Wetherington & Melchionna P. O. Box 90 1100 Crestar Bank Building Roanoke, Virginia 24002 Wetherington ~~ Mekhionr-a 2 ~i- -. ~IONNO C; s> 2 Oa m Z 0 9 N O > Cm-1 A Z; m a x3x 9 - -i 2 •• < A Z C N O N m m O m D m O1 11 3 ti .S ~ 9N K> x O>OCm NOS 9 N O N 'A K~ m N mom< mm ooooi>n .°n~K~ m T x T o z~ > >- 9m 2N-1 > a3•~ N m2 C JC > Z> 2 m- C -1--i--1-OA-1> 02mN Z NZN O OC'TZO T m9 O (10f -9mOKP 00[t> N9!->f m K S)-1 00-1 d VK -Ia mo> 0--->NOOA ~CON3-1C •im 2 2 2 m m D P 2 0 AO H• O<m1 O m<O ~1 H < - 2 A Z N• O m m = v I I ~ le t ~', 3 ::~_,; I '~;= t~1if I n e ~ o~e~ ~ a j3 ~ i O ~ ~ Z R zfi~S '~~: i :~n a!a 0 :d~ga •i •+~ ,~ ~, ~ ~~~ ,\ ~ ~~ \\\ ~~ 4.4 +e+~ F ~•~-_ a ~C7it7 \\ 1 \ 4/9 ~~ ~)y ~y0 <\ \` •, ~ aa ~ 8.a }j ~Y 8 y .",.R 6Y a a r _ S~i L P r E i ~.~' \ 1 \~• I x s, ~. l_ -- __ f ,> >ot _ _ i 4 ~+ I 1 G-~ EXHIBIT B BEGINNING at~an iron pin on the southeasterly side~of Virginia State Primary Route 419, said point being Point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat and being the northeasterly corner of the property herein described and adjacent to the property of Atalantis Group, Inc.; thence leaving Route 419 and with the line of Atalantis Group, Inc., property, S. 45 degrees 45' 00" E. 402.6 ft, to point 2, a fence post corner, corner to the property of Emma S. and Earl S. Cunningham; thence leaving the Atalantis Group Property and with the line of the Cunningham ,property the following three courses and distances: S. 50 degrees 30' 00" W. 131.3 ft. to point 3, marked by an iron pin; thence N. 45 degrees 07' 2$~~ W. 89.33 ft. to a fence post corner, being corner 4; thencE S. SI degrees 40' 00" W. 232,10 ft. to an existing iron pin, being corner 5, said point being on the northeasterly side of a 20 foot read right-of-way; thence with said road, N. 43 degrees 08' 00" W. 99.2 ft. to existing iron pin, being paint 6, said point being corner to the property of John H. Lipscomb and David A. McCray; thence with the Lipscomb and McCray property the following four courses and distances: N. 41 degrees 03' 00" E. 232.71 ft. to an iron pin at canner 7; thence N. 49 degrees Ol' I1" W. 163.11 ft. to an existing iron pin at corner 8; thence S. 40 degrees Ol' S6" W. 9 ft. to a fence post at corner 9 and N. 47 degrees 52' 59" W, g~,69 ft. to an iron pin at corner 10, said point being on the southeasterly side of Routa 419; thence with the southeasterly side of Route 419 the following two courses and distances, with a curve to the right having a radius of 929.93 ft., a chord bearing of N. 58 degrees 07' 01~~ E., an arc distance•of 80.38 ft. to an iron pin at corner 11; thence N. 66 degrees 42' 0" E. 169.3 ft. to an iron pzn at corner 1, the place of BEGINNING; and Containing 2.43 acres and being as more particularly shown on Plat of Survey dated June 3, 1985 made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C,, Engineers - Surveyozs, BEING the same property conveyed to Robert C. $ell by the following deeds: (l) dated November 2, 1983, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Eook 1200, page 529; and (2)~ dated February 6, 1973, recorded in the Clerk's Office aforesaid in Deed Baok 965, page 226. ~°~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 2.43-acre parcel of land at ) 4037 Electric Road, S. W. ) Roanoke County Tax Parcels ) 87.07-1-39, 87.07-1-40, 87.07-1-41 ) PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: The Petitioner Vito DeMonte hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. 1. The part of the parcel situated south of the zoning line on the attached Concept Plan will be used as an automobile collision repair facility and reasonably incidental and related purposes. 2. The part of the parcel south of the zoning line may also be used for the preparation for sale, service and repair of automobiles in connection with the operation of an automobile dealership, if any, from time to time on that part of the property north of the zoning line. 3. No automobiles for which collision repair is scheduled will be stored outside the building on the property, except in the parking compound to be located as shown on the attached concept plan. V~'ettkringuxi ~Mekhionna 4. The parking compound will be constructed substantially in the location and according to the specifications detailed on -~. the attached concept plan. 5. All conditions previously proffered and adopted in connection with zoning the property are eliminated. The conditions set forth in this proffer are the sole conditions affecting the property. Respectfully submitted, Vito DeMonte By : -- Counsel for Petitioner Vito DeMonte c/o Donald L. Wetherington Wetherington & Melchionna P.O. Box 90 1100 Crestar Bank Building Roanoke, Virginia 24002 ~tietherington ~ Mekh~ina 2 ,~ ~~~ sx ,.. ~ / • ~ ~ I ~.,. 2.01 ~' ~I i i J ~' " ~ ~I `• ' iz~ 3 '~ ~ e~ ~ ~ _T , ~. ~~ ~ I r '~ a ~ ~. ~' ~' I .~ _~I-_ ~I I `_ f~ \W ~ ~~~) N~ \ ~~1 •~~ \y ~ fie. ' \\ ~ba.y 6~~ ~~ ~~~y i ,R ~~V li ~ ~ ~ ' t; .. ~i~ ' x t i t ~ f 1! :~ Y Z Y ` } t 3 N~T~ a• , h i L ~~ ~B ~ v\~ ~~) \ \ \_~,Ji ~ ~e `` `\ ~ ~ i tl I I i , ~ ci I ~ w ~ Y 44o O i ~~I {i Rp it O U~`1~ Q;sr; { Q k$ 4; ~, ~~ =lei;' r., r. i..,. I i[it nisi I =°ii'- ~i,;, Ei=~`=. I :I I ~ .,I a 0 L W W O .N Z C 2 - Y r LL O > W O - rW>O •r O V_ Wi~OrLN00 < m W N C r r 6 aW J< J 6 N< U 0 0 oW¢-~ouo 6Y O26_] 0 W W U r V N S N 2 N W 2 0 <r¢O-r-r-r ] L W N< r L¢< rN2 W! -< < - 2 D LL K> W 1 m Z D i W 0 6 0 0 W 01 > W 6 W - N W~ Y 2 N 4 N 6' ON m70<O Z<r - NLL 6Q riUNW 6WOW W N O N~ S C> ~r dra- _Z=Z w~xu rw]<¢ rc uaaN uo a D O Z LL O 2<< C] O N N O LL ~~ ~~' -~. i ROA1901CE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date October 24, 1991 Name of Applicant Vito DeMonte Phone (804) 237-3111 Address of Applicant 3725 Wards Road, L chburg, Virginia 24502 Name of Developer same Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of Design Engineer Phone (or Donald L. Wetherington, Name of Contact Person Vito DeMonte his attorney 982-3800) Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map): Size of proposed development in acres: 2.43 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) Signature o Applicant .D ~~ ~ 1/ .~ 1 ~„ ~ .-- ~ ~ a ~:~_ i r ~ ~- .~ ' ~. ~-~ /. ',. t ~_.,_._. ~ ~ y. M y j~ ~ ,3 77 T ' +~."' a` •~ y ~ Q 2 ., ~ . ~, r~, ~~ m ~ ,~ y ~, a hY' y~ O ~ \ ~'. ~ ~ ~:~ t Y'. .'ley ti ~ ~. ~~~\~ ~ ~ _ ~ \~~\',-off '~ ~Y'`\ ~\ \ < ~y __ ~`1 ,~ ~, ` ~ ~ ~,~`' '~ ~'~ ' -~--- ~'yn -~ -~ ~~ ~ ~ -" \ ~~~ ! ~ r .' ''*e ~. /. „~„ ; . A ~ ~ .. o ~.. . . 1 - s t ~ ,. ; -:. ... . '' '. '~. ..:~. v4 _ ' ., ,~ .yy ~.K r _ ,~ /. VVJ/ \ _ .: ~ ~ N , 1 1: ~- . ".` ~ 3, i ~' ';~~~ ~ Q r ,. _ ~ tai' .""~7r,:.~_ \ti o ,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, ,- , i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , u - , ,. , . . , oQ .~ . , _~ _~ + ,'~. Lq ~ ,. ~- io ,. . _ . d i 6~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~_ _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ `~ x ~ \` r-~~ _ `~ \ F ' ~~( i ~ + ~ ' r.. \~ ~- ~ :~~~ ~- ~ ~o `- ~ ' ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ \ ~- / r ~ \~ 1 > ~ / ,, ' ~ ~,. ,_, ~ ~ ~ _ - ~- - ~~ .. __ .. ~ V ~ V~`~~ ~ ~~~ x . ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ., ~V y`v ~ ~ \~ ~ ~ ~ Y - - _ -- ~ ' ~~ ti'' / i f i ~ ~ ~ a !` r ~ ~ i ~'" / ~ ~ O / O ~ ~ ~ _, ~ ._ ~" (~~ i ~~ 1 I i y ~ ,- ,,, _ _ -- ` , ~ ~ ~ x \ ` ~ , ,\ ~~ ~ I - _ ~/ /r VSf s~ _ ,s _ -! ~4 ,,~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~F~• jG~n4 g •+ ~~~~ ~~, :+ u CIF1~i,~~e'~T `t 4s'. r ,` al~f `g Eqpt iyFr,i,,~.,,Q~ f - 'S t~ ~'6 l JT ~+['y~ i` J'am`. :i<<~'~^k'i'pN Gi.'rMn't~ t..~ ~.~: xi , ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~-b. ~ ~+ Sp[KK[ ~. a ~ ~V JCINI TY bIAP i ~ 4J ahµ~ ~- G -~ NORTB CObl11lUNITY SERVICES V I TO DEf-10NTE I un nQV~cino~~c~rr TAX f~1AP ~ b7.07-1-39, -40, -41 Date Rec.: r~~ Received By: nti~ ~ ti r•~r ~.-~..f-., Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION P~AC~~?n3 ISSuFO rn~a~ ~' 1. Owner's Name: ~,~,-Pit J, Miles. sr. Phone: 387-0886 Address: 1812 'I"txxnpson Memorial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019 2. Applicant's NaIDe:_ ~erett J. Miles, Sr. Phone: 387-0886 Address: 1812 Tt~npson Memorial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019 3. Location of Property: Roanoke county Tax Map Number(s): 4. Magisterial District: 36,01-2-3 Catawba 5. Size of Property: 9 q ~ -9 x 7 9• S ~~ ~ 902. 3 sQ- ~'r- 6. Existing Zoning: B-3 Existing Land Use: Used Car zit 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2 Proposed Land Use : Sale of Used H ousehold Appliances 8. Comprehensive Plan Desiqnat ion: 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No x (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of pour applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. a member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Kust He Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Metes and Bounds Description of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Application Fee Water and Sewer Application Concept Plan List of Adjacent Owners Vicinity Map Written Proffers (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: signature ~ ~7~~ Date /G -- ~ S - g ~ 1 J Yt~'+1 't f~~sl~r V~F` / ~+~i iJ~7~,~~, r` /f/4. f~/ 'arx,rwaW .~ y T a~-~--~-----11 ,JCL J' ~/~C } , ~ .OR{ y I ' ~ 1 ^~' `-v+~ 7 l -j•,~ t. l -,tl, ' i 11. I/' P ~~~j~ . ~~~ 'r' ~ f ~ ~ `~°"' I,Ci,' ' • ~~:~.. Oc0 y4~r S"f~' : ~ ~ ~~ .,~;:~•'v '•~i~••~ Ii 'Iwf I `~~ (i ~.{'~,~ ~ f'1 ~ •-•'!~i ~ 1 ~= •~' ~'`~ ~`~~.f;l•1 ~ I -' ~,` di ' `~• j {~ I ~~ 11 ~ ail ~ ~>I,~~Y[~ f[- .s_ v: ~ ~;~~+ '~ctia •' I l 1 I ;~ I l f _i :, ~i. j c i ''l "' I 'i ~ ~ , µ.(;+yi ~ -• E ~ ,{I 1 ~6• 1 ~~~-I.7 .a ~~f~~ ~~ ~.i FI. ~ b' , -iii ' i'.1 •;~:,, ~~. +, ~`•'•~+'r .~, wV _~ f ~~ ~r 17r ,i~ r' n f~ 1 ~I~ + '~{!T j~ wA • ;'. .,r• ~, 111 ,("P~i ~+ 1• ~ ~ ,. i,~~~~ l~ ~• it'"'~ N ~1~.~'!-., (~-_ f ' ~ l ~ ~ W~ .,; }} ~ ~ ";; °t" a•-srr•!c'~NO~Ee6F~cC~ ~ ~ .,. F ,t 1 ~' 'u y~/~ (( .. ~ ' ~; 'a s :: ` i r {1) ~'` py •~ ,_r I~. ~ (f ..~ 0 .s r.n~ ~ gyp. !g,'fQ,T ~^ • ~ ,~- i,• ,.~`z 1•>;~+t..j~ ~ ~ '~I'~ NiG7•tf SPv..rv ~' ~I~O qD KJ T L :~ 7'TO I+ /QOA/:r j,:'~.. ~ '1 ~,1•~~ A<> ; .. l~~~rl_ •. ~~ ^'}'~"~~~oMC~I~~Ij ~O j;v a"i *"~T~r~is. j_`~.~ ~ L ~.. .. ... - ,amt _ ~ •-~ ~~~ ~,~ .~ ?Y ' ~G; -•-.544'00'}'/ j ~'~ ~ ~iit 'fl~~l~+~,3~ ' ' Q47.•--~'~_ `'~ 'I.:~t. t-`yam°~~.~i l ~~•1, ,Ii :i •7r• ir11' :i~~~~ Q~ _ - LBM`~` ~,~ : 1 _ '~ ~l~~yE ~~•I;l • 1 ~~ IY'~i~~'I;' ~~b~i ~~r f{~ ~ ~, ' ~ ~ Y~J fTFx2 '#4 1 t t ~ ~~ I~ ~ ]L r~''f,i ~ } ~ _ r ~1 r ~'I' t i O• ~ ~~' , i .,., `~ ' {,, t~~l y, ~.11., [;~~nL~ 11111 r ~ d,~v:;* _ , . t t ifs ~ ~ ! 1 f ~ •.~ ~. ~ 1, ~Iil li ,.a:p+ i S i, i~~~a~ ~ .~ ~,• - L~ . F ~4 ~. ,~ ~, .. .+. s•: alto a P.: ~• '~. ~+,~ ".. 1-;~:~~ ~ ;,.' OF,4' ~/BG~~a AGQE '~'~PACT I ,DE/NG ~ CONVEYED a ,,~ t ' , ,.. ~ _ {_ , ~' ~-~°~a Ali i;~!' ~, ~~tJ~ti~~F~~f ~l -; `, } ~VEQ~T T :,` ~.:fAC~S~N _/Ii~/_ L•ES ~ . - ~. . ~ }~• ~_. ~, • • S/TU.4T. ,4 T, NflNG~il/6 i ROCf~ ~ /N ~' K BES$ c`C ~- - ~POANC/l•E~ ,' COUNTY,•'.I I' V,P6/A//A _- ~$!~ r. b" SCALE./..r~0' .1 ~• ,~!OEC'. 5, /9,73 ' 107.0,:-~`~ •,~ .~- - ~`1.3y 'r~~ JACK G.' 13E5S +` `:~~'" ~'t :t. ~ f '" G~~~jR'T/FJED L,.i9n/O SU,P/EYO••P ' ~'dcs~` qtr . ~. ..:~7 'l • _,i' ~r of ~~' ,.' t. ~ v' ~ .. +" !.• 1~ ~.~ ~~ a `..w~I~ ..'•+.C-•i•.lYri`i1P1~u N.. l!. - V ~a y /.+ ~~ - - .r.:: a. '_ ._ ....rte _ _ e .~,; _ '. ROA80EE COONTY OTILIZ7 DEPART!(Eti? APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SE~tER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMEIiT Date October 24, 1991 Name of Applicant ~erett J, rules, Sr. phone 387-0886 Address of Applicant 1812 Z'Yu7meson yS~norial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019 Name of Developer Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Et7erett J. Miles, Sr. Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) : Size of proposed development in acres s Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if availab el . (OVER) ~-~ _. . ~_ ~ . _~-~ .- O- J ~ _.: ~~! ~ ~ O- • ~ \\11 ~ ~(~L sY ~ ~ ~~ + s-~ i D Yn~ru COMMUNITY SERVICES ANDDEVBLOPJrlEN~' Everett J . ;Miles 33C to ~2 i i VICINITY MAP ACTION # ITEM NUMBER fT °' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Acquire Two Parcels of Land from Canaan Land Company COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : l.G,~'X~wn-z~'Lt-,~~ a,- - ,=~~•c>-vr-c~ ~~ BACKGROUND' During construction of the Roanoke River Interceptor, it was determined that the sewer line crossing of Poor Mountain Road would have to be made by boring under the road. This determination was made by the Highway Department in order to maintain traffic on Poor Mountain Road during construction. The location of the sewer line, manhole and boring pit is across two parcels of land owned by Canaan Land Company. The parcels are 50 feet by 96 feet and 60 feet by 104 feet and are located between Poor Mountain Road and the Roanoke River. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The two above mentioned parcels have little usable area that is not located in the floodway. The construction of the water line, sewer line and manhole on the parcel will further limit the owners use of the property. During discussions between the owner and the County, it was agreed that purchase of the land by the County was preferable to granting of an easement across the land. A purchase price of $2,000 was tentatively agreed to by the owner and the County. Due to the low value of the land under consideration, an outside appraisal of market value was not made. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Due to the significant portion of the land that would be required for a water line, sewer line and access easement along with its associated cost, staff feels there is no alternative to purchasing the land. Funds are available for the purchase of the land from the Roanoke River Interceptor Project account. .. ,~ ., i~-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that Board approve first reading of the ordinance authorizing acquisition of two parcels of land from Canaan Land Company. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor aig, P.E. ~~, Utility Director APPROVED: /~ Elmer C. Hodges County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ?.~ exi r ^ ` ..... /~ ` 'n= O i I - __. r•.__ ~. ~~ P~ jF~ GHE~hITS ' I ' ~~ _?' ~ ;~ `~ ~' '~u~ i ""~ ` / ` FOFepSM j ~~~ ~ ~ f: ~. VICINITY MAP N-~ 8 NORTS ~ ____ _ __ ... _ _ __ z _ ~ ~ PROPERTY OF y PpRPR~ o ROGER E. RARDIN j~ON ~ ' ' o TAX NO. 65.00-02-53 C ~ n- D.B. 1069. PG. 809 ~j 40' W AjER R N a ~ N'~W S ARC SEWS ~ 1~E o~ Sp,NI -~ ~ - ~ S 32'30' E ASEMEN ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 38.1 PROPERTY OF N ~ oro cD o N .VARIABLE WIDTH -~ N w ~ TEMPORARY CONSTF CAROLYN C. JAY N ~ ~ EASEMENT -~ ~, TAX NO. 64.02-01-57 `~ W.B. 44, PG. 911 ~ 7 64.54 SEE NOTES 3 & 4 ~ •°,~ ~ p~ PIN _~~ .~ ' 82'53 _----------- i~ss' ~--S 213. S 78 '23' 40° W ' • 324.55' ~ I~ ~, cn ~ PROPOSE PROPOSED MANHOLE #120 ~ ~ oo ~, o )3'24" W ~ z ~` N rn~ f .-- cD ;' TOTAL N 10'26'54 W °' HOME 66.87' ' ~, ° . ~ '~ Nrn ~ ~ ~, ~, TAX I PROPERTY OF °- rn °', s CANAAN LAND COMPANY ~ ,~• TAX N0. 64.02-01-21 D.B. 1326, F;. 900 ~ i SEE N~Tr b ~ ~ -- - RnA"1~KE RIB -~ ,,~. ,~PPk~;~'P,"ATE ! IMITS `. JF wATE~. .~ GEORc 30' PRESCRIPTIVE--~ ~~~ ' TAu ~i ~ ACQUISITION OF TWO PROPERTIES FROM CANAAN, LAND BNGINSBRDYG coMPANY N- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE TWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM CANAAN LAND COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ROANOKE RIVER SEWER INTERCEPTOR PHASE III PROJECT WHEREAS, a permanent sanitary sewer easement is required across two parcels of land owned by Canaan Land Company in connection with the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project; and, WHEREAS, the small size of the lots and the construction requirements for the project will limit the use of said lots by the owner, and damage the residue, to the extent that purchase of a fee simple interest to said lots would be appropriate; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated with the property owner for the acquisition of said parcels, being Lots 1 and 2, lying between Poor Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according to the Map Showing Subdivision of Tract of land Lying North of and Adjacent to "Nature's Own Bathing Pool" of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 3, page 8; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcels from Canaan Land Company for the sum of $2,000.00; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 19, 1991, and the second reading was held on December 3, 1991. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: _~ . 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of Lots 1 and 2, lying between Poor Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according to the above-reference map from Canaan Land Company, for a sum not to exceed $2,000.00, is hereby authorized and approved; and 2. That the consideration of $2000.00 shall be paid from the funds previously appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to the Utility Department budget for the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project; and, 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp5 ]\agenda\realert\rA~~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing Exchange of Real Estate adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: !~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This ordinance will implement an exchange of two small parcels of real estate between the Roanoke County School Board and Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation in conjunction with their joint construction of a new street (Barrens Road extension) providing improved bus access to Burlington Elementary School When the Roanoke County School Board acquired the property for Burlington School in 1938, the seller reserved a 60 foot right-of- way easement along the western edge of that parcel. By an Agreement dated July 11, 1991, the Roanoke County School Board entered into a contract with Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp., the successor in interest to the seller, to share some of the cost of construction of a new street, 50 feet in width. This street, an extension of Barrens Road across Peters Creek Road, will be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and will be subsequently conveyed to VDOT upon the expiration of the required waiting period. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The construction of this new street will result in a small parcel owned by the School Board, containing 0.031 acre (Parcel 1), being cut off from the main school property on the west side of this street, and a small parcel owned by Friendship Manor, containing 0.217 acre (Parcel 2), being cut off from their property on the east side of the street. In accordance with the Agreement of July 11, 1991, prior to commencement of construction of the new road, the parties intend to execute a deed to exchange these two orphan parcels as well as to extinguish any remaining interest of Friendship Manor in the original 60 foot right-of-way easement on the Burlington School property. The Roanoke County School Board at its November 21, 1991, meeting will adopt a resolution declaring ,~-~. the parcel of 0.031 acres (Parcel 1) as surplus and conveying such parcel to the County of Roanoke for reconveyance to Friendship Manor. By said resolution, the Roanoke County School Board has expressed its desire to receive title to the parcel of 0.217 acres (Parcel 2) which adjoins Burlington School. This ordinance authorizes the acceptance of title to Parcel 1 by the County and in turn authorizes the County Administrator to execute such deeds and other documents as shall be necessary to carry out this exchange of real estate. FISCAL IMPACTS' None ALTERNATIVES' 1. Authorize the exchange of two parcels of real estate to facilitate extension of Barrens Road. 2. Decline to authorize such exchange of real estate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends favorable consideration of the ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ ~ J ep B. Obenshain S nior Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers __ C:\W P51\AGENDA\REALEST~BURLINGI'ON } ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING EBCHANGE OF REAL ESTATE ADJACENT TO BIIRLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KITH FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION WHEREAS, by Agreement dated July 11, 1991, the County School Board of Roanoke County and Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation entered into a contract for the sharing of costs for the construction of a new road over the property of both parties adjacent to Burlington Elementary School and for the exchange of parcels of real estate which would be left in isolation by such construction; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on Thursday, November 21, 1991, the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, has adopted a resolution declaring a parcel of 0.031 acre, which will remain upon the western side of Barrens Road upon the completion of said 50 foot road, as surplus property and requesting the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to convey such property to Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation as part of an exchange of real estate pursuant to said agreement; and WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has caused a true copy of the aforesaid resolution to be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as required by law so that the title to the aforesaid parcel of real estate is now vested in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the conveyance of the hereinafter described real estate was held on ~f'~. November 19, 1991; a second reading was held on December 3, 1991. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows: 1. That the conveyance of certain real estate identified as "Parcel 1" on a plat designated "RESUBDIVISION FOR COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION" dated February 15, 1991, prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., having previously been declared surplus property by the County School Board of Roanoke County, to the County of Roanoke is hereby accepted and approved; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the aforesaid property is declared surplus and is made available to exchange for real estate for other public uses; and 3. That the conveyance of such Parcel 1 to Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation in exchange for Parcel 2 identified in the same plat, which Parcel 2 shall be conveyed to the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, for school purposes is in the public interest and is hereby accepted and approved. 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance and exchange of the aforesaid properties, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp57 \agenda\realest\burlington.ord ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending County Code regulating the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~,~ ~~ BACKGROUND: The first reading of this ordinance was passed on October 8, 1991. A request was made for some additional information and input from the local alarm industry. The Public Safety Agencies of Roanoke County respond to a large number of mechanical/electrical alarms annually. A high number of these alarms are false, resulting from human error, poor maintenance or inferior product quality. Nearly every alarm requires an emergency response exposing public safety employees and others on the highway to a higher traffic safety risk. Additionally, repeated false alarms tend to delay response to that location. The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department has determined that it already has authority to deal with false fire alarms under the Roanoke County Fire Prevention Code and Commonwealth of Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Therefore, this ordinance does not address false fire alarms except by reference to the above two fire prevention codes. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Public Safety Team reviewed the problems associated with alarms 1 ,~' for security, intrusion and fire. It was alarms had a very high probability of being police alarms received in a six month study (see Addendum 1) determined that police false. Less than 1% of period were emergencies. Responses to alarms are typically made under emergency conditions with multiple police units responding. Increased exposure to liability arises when both employees and the public are exposed to high speed public safety vehicles. Currently, there is little private sector incentive to insure employee alarm training/discipline, correct faulty installation, provide quality maintenance or install high quality equipment matched to site requirements. Alarms, both real and false, terminating in the E-911 Center may tie up incoming emergency phone lines to the point of grid lock. A survey shows that ten localities in Virginia have ordinances that address both the termination of alarms in E-911 Centers and the response to repeated false alarms by public safety responders. These ordinances typically control alarm termination in E-911 Centers and provide for a graduated penalty in the instance multiple false alarms are received. Currently, one on-duty dispatcher's time is essentially devoted to monitoring, receiving, dispatching and resetting alarms. After the first reading, and a public hearing on this ordinance, October 8, 1991, additional contact was made with a representative from the alarm installers in the Roanoke area. Further contact was made with the Director of Maintenance at Tanglewood Mall. Input from both sources was received and several minor changes were made. They were: - eliminating fees based on multiple unit responses - allowing four false alarms in 12 months, instead of four false alarms in six months - setting a new fee schedule and requiring an inspection of an alarm system upon the fourth false alarm in 12 months. - changing the review panel membership by adding the Building Commissioner and eliminating the County Attorney - adding the definition of Alarm Company - modifying County Fire Department reaction to false alarms so that penalties could be assessed under the existing County or State Fire Codes as opposed to this ordinance - requiring that new alarm systems include a UPS component, 2 ~- ~ (uninterrupted power supply) or battery back up consistent with manufacturer's specifications. Careful consideration was given in drafting the ordinance so that an occasional false alarm would not result in a violation of law. It was written in a spirit that encourages warning, enforcement and ultimately compliance. Unusual situations may be reviewed by an administrative review panel. The contents of the proposed ordinance represents the unanimous opinion of the Public Safety Team. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative #1: To adopt the proposed ordinance. The proposed fee schedule is as follows: - First four false alarms in a twelve month period - no fee. - Fifth false alarm in a twelve month period - $25.00 and mandatory system inspection. - Sixth false alarm in a twelve month period - $50.00. - Seventh false alarm in a twelve month period - $100.00. - Eighth false alarm and all subsequent false alarms in a twelve month period - $150.00. The additional revenue generated could be spent on capital needs at the Communications Center. The ordinance is designed to encourage compliance. A recent review of records indicates that several thousands of dollars in potential charges and fines may be available, although it is anticipated that this amount would decrease dramatically in the first year based upon other communities and their experience with similar legislation. Alternative #2: Do not adopt the ordinance. Failure to regulate alarm system quality and termination of alarms in the E-911 Center will result in continued higher liability exposure to the public and employees and increased drains on limited County resources. There will remain the negative impact of responding to continuous false alarms which is detrimental to the public safety mission. 3 I-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the unanimous recommendation of the Public Safety Team that the Board approve Alternative #1. SUBMITTED BY: Thomas C. Fuqua Fire and Rescue Chief Chairman, Public Safety Team APPROVED: ~~~ Elmer C. odge, Jr. County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: 4 Robers Johnson McGraw Nickens Eddy No Yes Abs Addendum 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: '~ Captain D. A. LaPrade Ramona P. Kern September 27, 1991 False Alarm Calls Below is a table summary of false alarm calls for business and residential alarms since May, 1990. Date Range Alarm Type Alarms Handled Handled Verified ~`alse Received by by Alarms Alarms Roanoke Other ,County. 05-21-90 Daytime 150 142 8 7 135 to Business 12-31-90 Alarm Nighttime 717 674 43 9 665 Business Alarms Residential 411 383 28 6 377 Alarms CUMBINEb 1278 1199 79 22 1177 ALARMS 01-01-91 Daytime 147 140 7 10 130 to Business 09-15-91 Alarm Nighttime 432 412 20 6 406 Business Alarms Residentail 512 481 31 5 476 Alarms .COMBINED 1091 1033 58 21 '1b12 ALARMS ~~ ,. ~). AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE 111991-12 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS" TO CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the improper operation of fire and security alarms by property owners, and the occasional unlawful activation of such alarms, within the County of Roanoke threatens the safety and health of the citizens of this county through unnecessary responses by police and fire units as well as causing unnecessary expense to the public and inconvenience to the neighbors of such alarms; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance occurred on October 8, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing occurred on November 19, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a new Article VIII, "Fire and Security Alarms" of Chapter 16, "POLICE" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and enacted as follows: ARTICLE VIII. FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS Sec 16-20. Purpose The purpose of this article is to regulate the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems in premises to which the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to respond in order to reduce the number of false alarms and protect 1 a , the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county. Sec 16-21. Definitions For purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section: a. Alarm Any device which, when actuated by the occurrence of a criminal act or fire risk requiring police, fire or rescue response, transmits a signal to a central alarm system, a third party or directly to the Public Safety Center or produces an audible or visible signal designed to notify persons within audible or visual range of the signal. b. Alarm Board The facility located in the communications section of the Public Safety Center which is designed to receive direct signals from Alarm Systems authorized to be connected thereto. c. Alarm Company Any Person legally authorized to transact business within the Commonwealth of Virginia and currently maintaining either a Virginia contractor's license or a local business license to engage in the business of installation, maintenance, alteration, servicing or monitoring alarm systems. d. Automatic Dialinq Device A device installed, operational and which is 2 1 ~ interconnected to a telephone line programmed to send a recorded message, code or signal from a protected premises to a telephone number assigned to the Public Safety Center. This term shall include a "telephone dialer" or a "tape dialer" or any other similar device or equipment. e. False Alarm Any security or fire alarm signal, communicated directly or indirectly to the Public Safety Center which is not in response to actual or threatened criminal activity or fire risk requiring immediate police, fire, or rescue response. False Alarms include negligently or accidentally activated signals; signals which are the result of faulty, malfunctioning, or improperly installed or maintained equipment; signals which are purposely activated to summon the police department or fire and rescue service in non-emergency situations; and signals for which the actual cause is not determined. False Alarms shall not include signals activated by unusually severe weather conditions or other causes which are identified and determined by the Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the User f. Hiqh Hazard Premises A facility requiring urgent attention to which the police, fire or rescue department is expected to respond for the protection of multiple persons as designated by 3 the Chief of Police or the Chief of Fire and Rescue including but not limited to nursing homes, hospitals and homes for the elderly. Such facilities shall include those structures meeting the requirements for institutional occupation under the Roanoke County Building Code. g. Person Any individual, firm, partnership, association, company, corporation, organization or other legal entity. h. Protected Premises The premises upon which a Security or Fire Alarm System has been placed for the purpose of detecting a hazard. i. Public Safety Center The Roanoke County Public Safety Center including the E- 911 Center and the dispatch communications center or their successors in title. j. Security or Fire Alarm System/Alarm System Any assembly of equipment or device designated to detect and signal the unauthorized intrusion into a premises or to signal an attempted burglary, robbery, other criminal activity, or fire at the protected premises, to which the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to respond. Such term, however, shall not include security alarm systems maintained by governmental agencies. k. User 4 Any Person using a Security or Fire Alarm System or having an insurable interest in any premises upon which is located such a system, regardless of whether the Person owns the Security or Fire Alarm System or the premises on which it is located. Sec 16-22. False Alarms - Prohibited a. It shall be unlawful for any Person to knowingly and without just cause to activate a Security or Fire Alarm System to summon the police department or fire and rescue service in situations where there is no actual or threatened criminal or fire risk requiring immediate police, fire or rescue response. b. Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1 Misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) or not more than twelve (12) months in jail, or both. Sec 16-23. Alarm - Deactivation The police officer or fire and rescue official responding to a False Alarm shall have the authority to deactivate said Alarm System without liability when it is disturbing the peace and quiet of the community, if the User fails to deactivate the Alarm System within a reasonable time. A reasonable time for purposes of this section shall be 30 minutes from the time that substantial efforts are first made to contact the User. Sec 16-24. New Alarm Connections a. The County of Roanoke shall only maintain alarm monitoring capability for those premises that are deemed to be a 5 High Hazard Premises. Such decision to issue permits for these Alarm Systems shall require the approval of the Chief of Police and Chief of Fire & Rescue of Roanoke County. b. New Users may connect, maintain and operate Security or Fire Alarm Systems that have their point of termination in the Public Safety Center only upon satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. Completion upon an annual basis of an application form to be provided by the Chief of Police, or if afire alarm, the Chief of Fire & Rescue, containing the following information: (a). name and address of the protected premises; (b). name, address, telephone number or other locations whereby the person(s) maintaining the alarm can be located; (c). name, address, telephone number or other means of locating a minimum of two persons who can be contacted on a 24 hour-a-day basis in case of alarm or malfunction. (d). any additional relevant information requested by the Chief of Police or Chief of Fire & Rescue of Roanoke County; (e) . execution of a release of liability by the User or by an officer or authorized agent of the User. Any material misstatement of fact made by any applicant 6 shall be sufficient cause for refusal to issue a permit or to revoke any permit previously issued. 2. Installation by an Alarm Company or licensed electrician maintaining a valid business license within the Commonwealth of Virginia with the cost to be paid by the User. 3. Monthly inspection and testing of the Alarm System by the User and reporting, by the 10th day of the next month, of the results of said inspections to the Chief of Police or, if for a fire alarm, to the Chief of Fire & Rescue, on forms to be provided by said departments. 4. Implementation of a continuous training program for appropriate employees and others, who may have occasion to activate the Alarm System, regarding the use and operation of such Alarm System, which includes instruction on the setting, activation and resetting of the Alarm. c. Roanoke County assumes no liability for any omission or commission resulting from the Security or Fire Alarm System terminating in the Alarm Boards in the Public Safety Center. d. No alarm permit issued under this Article can be transferred to another person. A permit holder shall inform the Chief of Police of any change that materially alters any information listed on the permit application within five business days of such occurrence. 7 Sec 16-25. Deactivation of Existing Alarms - Prohibited Alarms a. Any User which has its Alarm System connected to the Public Safety Center on the effective date of this ordinance shall, 30 days after receipt of written communication from the Chief of Police, disconnect any alarm terminating therein. Failure to disconnect will result in said alarm being disconnected by the County without liability, at the owners expense. b. After the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person to install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or service which is programmed to transmit a prerecorded message or code signal directly from a residence, premises or dwelling to any telephone number assigned to the Public Safety Center, Police, or Fire and Rescue Departments, or to install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or other Security or Fire Alarm System in violation of the provision of this ordinance. c. Alarms may be connected to an Alarm Board located in the Public Safety Center only with the express written approval of the Chief of Police and the Chief of Fire & Rescue of Roanoke County. d. Nothing contained herein will prohibit any Person or User from installing an Alarm System which terminates with a commercial or other alarm monitoring and answering service. e. A User of a local Alarm shall adjust the mechanism of any Alarm or cause such mechanism to be adjusted so that an alarm signal shall not sound for longer than 30 minutes after being activated. 8 f. After the effective date of this ordinance, no Alarm System shall be installed in any premises within this county which does not have an independent source of power capable of providing an uninterrupted power supply to such alarm in conformity with thee manufactures specifications for that installation. In the absence of any such manufactures specification, the Alarm System shall provide a minimum of eight hours of independent power supply. Sec 16-26. False Alarm Fees a. Users shall be allowed four false alarms, without fees, in any calendar year. For each false alarm beyond the four permitted by this section, there will be fees levied against the User, except as follows: 1. No fee shall be charged for a false alarm if, prior to dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department to the scene of the alarm, the Public Safety Center is notified by the User or an authorized employee or agent of said User. 2. No fee shall be charged for a False Alarm when the User demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police, or designee, that said false alarm was generated by adverse weather conditions, or electrical or telephonic power failures or other causes which are identified and determined by the Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the User. (i) All fire False Alarms shall come under the jurisdiction of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in accordance with the Fire Prevention Code of the County 9 of Roanoke as set forth in Article II of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code. b. If within any calendar year, there is a dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department in response to more than four false alarms per premises, fees shall be assessed against the User for all subsequent dispatches in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Fifth Dispatch $ 25.00 2. Sixth Dispatch $ 50.00 3. Seventh Dispatch $100.00 4. Eighth and all subsequent Dispatches $150.00 The fees assessed by this section are intended to reflect the actual costs or a portion thereof incurred by the County in providing alarm responses and in administering this Chapter and such fees shall be re-evaluated on an as-needed basis, c. Telephonic requests received for police, fire or rescue response to a protected premises or dwelling, from a third party alarm monitoring service that meet the criteria for "False Alarms" as defined by ordinance shall be subject to the false alarm fee schedule contained herein. The User shall be legally responsible for all fees or charges imposed thereunder. d. Any User experiencing a fourth False Alarm as defined in subsection a. above shall have their Alarm System inspected by an Alarm Company. This inspection shall include a complete examination of the Alarm System including, but not limited to, satisfactory design and installation of the alarm equipment, proper functioning 10 of the Alarm and education of the User in the proper operation of the Alarm System. The Alarm Company shall record the details of this inspection on a form provided by the Police Department for this purpose. The completed inspection report shall be returned to the Police Department by the Alarm Company within seven days of the inspection. A copy of the completed inspection report shall be provided to the User by the Alarm Company at the same time. e. The Police Department shall notify a User of the requirements of subsection d by registered mail within 30 days of the fourth false alarm. If the inspection required by subsection d is not completed within 30 days of this notification, the User shall be liable to the County for an administrative service fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). f. The Roanoke County Police Department will be responsible for maintaining records of false alarms for billing purposes and shall forward such information to the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office on a monthly basis. g. In the event that a User fails to pay a false alarm fee or administrative service fee, or both, levied under this Section within 30 days of the billing date used by the County Treasurer, the User shall be charged interest at the judgment rate from such billing date All such fees and charges shall be paid to the Roanoke County Treasurer. An appeal, as provided for below, shall suspend the running of such interest, but interest shall be due to Roanoke County as calculated from the date the fees or charges were originally billed in the event that such appeal is denied. 11 h. Any fees or charges, or both, collected under this Section shall be deposited in a capital improvement account for the benefit of the Roanoke County Public Safety Communications Center. Sec. 16-27. Administrative appeal procedure a. Disputes over the number of False Alarms or assessment of fees may be reviewed by a panel consisting of the Chief of Police or designee, an Assistant County Administrator and the Building Commissioner upon receipt of a written request from the petitioner within five business days of receiving the bill. Decisions of this appeal panel shall be consistent with the purposes and intent of this ordinance. A consensus of the panel shall constitute the final decision which shall be communicated to the petitioner and Roanoke County Treasurer in writing. A member of the fire and signal alarm industry shall be an ex-officio member. b. The administrative appeal panel shall consider the following factors in reaching a determination as to the appropriateness of a false alarm fee or administrative service fee: 1. Evidence of attempts by the User to eliminate the cause of False Alarms, including (i) installation of new equipment, (ii) replacement of defective equipment, (iii) inspection and repair of the system by an Alarm Company, and (iv) specific formal training of User. 2. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by electrical storm, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, or other act of God. 12 3. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by the disruption of telephone circuits beyond the control of the User or any Alarm Company or central monitoring agency and that the cause of such disruption has been corrected. 4. Written evidence that the Alarm System which caused the alarm responses has been disconnected and removed from the premises. Sec. 16-28. Authority of Department of Fire and Rescue This Article shall not be interpreted to limit the authority of the Department of Fire and Rescue and the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County to enforce any provision of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as incorporated in Article II of Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection", of the Roanoke County Code regarding Alarms Systems or False Alarms. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after January 1, 1992. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve as amended with fees remaining the same, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court 13 C. O. Clemens, Chief Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Chief Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer 14 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE _CTTIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIIE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ;;~ NAME ~ ~ ~~ ~-{~, w ~ 5~ ~'f , ~~' ~ ~ ~~ ; ~ Ste; ~ ~ s ;1 ~~~,~ ADDRESS " ~ ~ ' 1 __ PHONE ..~ ~ 3 - ~ / ~ ~" I11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 iii~i~i~iii~i~~iiiii~ii~ii~iii~~~~i~tii~~i~i~~itiii~~iiiii~iii~ii~~i~ti~~itiii AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ T ~ ~~ APPE CE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~/~~ ~_ `' r'= _ ;~~' f~~'~,` ~ ~, ~ k~ i_) ~;,~.~ ,~ ~ v ~ ,t` Ci ' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR 1~ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,^ NAME , ADDRESS ~, - ,. PHONE = = ~- ~ ,~ ' '- w ""1 I""""' I' 1 t""""' I"' ~""""""' f""'t"""""""""""' 1 t 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' -1- ~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ w,e~~y ~~~ s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIC GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE WA yy E ~~.vy~ ~. ~~1--~7T- ~7zT~ t ~0 4- ;'~~- X300 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 iii~iii~iii~~~t~ii~~~ii~i~~i~~~~i~~i~i~iiiii~i~~~ii~iiitiiiii~~~~i~i~~t~~~ii~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. -~- - ~--~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: _ ~ Div Un U ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~. ~'~'/~/~~ ~ h~ ~ ~-z ~. ,,;.~ ADDRESS _ ~ :.3i ~ S ~--~ ~=~~L c~ v,~= PHONE -~ ~ _~ ~ .~ 5~- ~ ~ 5 ~~ ~~11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 t ~ - _% .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS" TO CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the improper operation of fire and security alarms by property owners, and the occasional unlawful activation of such alarms, within the County of Roanoke threatens the safety and health of the citizens of this county through unnecessary responses by police and fire units as well as causing unnecessary expense to the public and inconvenience to the neighbors of such alarms; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance occurred on October 8, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing occurred on November 19, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a new Article VIII, "Fire and Security Alarms" of Chapter 16, "POLICE" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and enacted as follows: ARTICLE VIII. FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS Sec 16-20. Purpose The purpose of this article is to regulate the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems in premises to which the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to respond in order to reduce the number of false alarms and protect 1 ~~ the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county. Sec 16-21. Definitions For purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section: a. Alarm Any device which, when actuated by the occurrence of a criminal act or fire risk requiring police, fire or rescue response, transmits a signal to a central alarm system, a third party or directly to the Public Safety Center or produces an audible or visible signal designed to notify persons within audible or visual range of the signal. b. Alarm Board The facility located in the communications section of the Public Safety Center which is designed to receive direct signals from Alarm Systems authorized to be connected thereto. c. Alarm Company Any Person legally authorized to transact business within the Commonwealth of Virginia and currently maintaining either a Virginia contractor's license or a local business license to engage in the business of installation, maintenance, alteration, servicing or monitoring alarm systems. d. Automatic Dialing Device A device installed, operational and which is 2 '" interconnected to a telephone line programmed to send a recorded message, code or signal from a protected premises to a telephone number assigned to the Public Safety Center. This term shall include a "telephone dialer" or a "tape dialer" or any other similar device or equipment. e. False Alarm Any security or fire alarm signal, communicated directly or indirectly to the Public Safety Center which is not in response to actual or threatened criminal activity or fire risk requiring immediate police, fire, or rescue response. False Alarms include negligently or accidentally activated signals; signals which are the result of faulty, malfunctioning, or improperly installed or maintained equipment; signals which are purposely activated to summon the police department or fire and rescue service in non-emergency situations; and signals for which the actual cause is not determined. False Alarms shall not include signals activated by unusually severe weather conditions or other causes which are identified and determined by the Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the User f. Hiqh Hasard Premises A facility requiring urgent attention to which the police, fire or rescue department is expected to respond for the protection of multiple persons as designated by 3 the Chief of Police or the Chief of Fire and Rescue including but not limited to nursing homes, hospitals and homes for the elderly. Such facilities shall include those structures meeting the requirements for institutional occupation under the Roanoke County Building Code. g. Person Any individual, firm, partnership, association, company, corporation, organization or other legal entity. h. Protected Premises The premises upon which a Security or Fire Alarm System has been placed for the purpose of detecting a hazard. i. Public Safety Center The Roanoke County Public Safety Center including the E- 911 Center and the dispatch communications center or their successors in title. j. Security or Fire Alarm System/Alarm System Any assembly of equipment or device designated to detect and signal the unauthorized intrusion into a premises or to signal an attempted burglary, robbery, other criminal activity, or fire at the protected premises, to which the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to respond. Such term, however, shall not include security alarm systems maintained by governmental agencies. k. Oser 4 Any Person using a Security or Fire Alarm System or having an insurable interest in any premises upon which is located such a system, regardless of whether the Person owns the Security or Fire Alarm System or the premises on which it is located. Sec 16-22. False Alarms - Prohibited a. It shall be unlawful for any Person to knowingly and without just cause to activate a Security or Fire Alarm System to summon the police department or fire and rescue service in situations where there is no actual or threatened criminal or fire risk requiring immediate police, fire or rescue response. b. Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1 Misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) or not more than twelve (12) months in jail, or both. Sec 16-23. Alarm - Deactivation The police officer or fire and rescue official responding to a False Alarm shall have the authority to deactivate said Alarm System without liability when it is disturbing the peace and quiet of the community, if the User fails to deactivate the Alarm System within a reasonable time. A reasonable time for purposes of this section shall be 30 minutes from the time that substantial efforts are first made to contact the User. Sec 16-24. New Alarm Connections a. The County of Roanoke shall only maintain alarm monitoring capability for those premises that are deemed to be a 5 .~ a shall be sufficient cause for refusal to issue a permit or to revoke any permit previously issued. 2. Installation by an Alarm Company or licensed electrician maintaining a valid business license within the Commonwealth of Virginia with the cost to be paid by the User. 3. Monthly inspection and testing of the Alarm System by the User and reporting, by the 10th day of the next month, of the results of said inspections to the Chief of Police , or, if for a fire alarm, to the Fire Chief, on forms to be provided by said departments. 4. Implementation of a continuous training program for appropriate employees and others, who may have occasion to activate the Alarm System, regarding the use and operation of such Alarm System, which includes instruction on the setting, activation and resetting of the Alarm. c. Roanoke County assumes no liability for any omission or commission resulting from the Security or Fire Alarm System terminating in the Alarm Boards in the Public Safety Center. d. No alarm permit issued under this Article can be transferred to another person. A permit holder shall inform the Chief of Police of any change that materially alters any information listed on the permit application within five business days of such occurrence. 7 High Hazard Premises. Such decision to issue permits for these Alarm Systems shall require the approval of the Chief of Police and Fire Chief of Roanoke County. b. New Users may connect, maintain and operate Security or Fire Alarm Systems that have their point of termination in the Public Safety Center only upon satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. Completion upon an annual basis of an application form to be provided by the Chief of Police, or if a fire alarm, the Fire Chief, containing the following information: (a). name and address of the protected premises; (b). name, address, telephone number or other locations whereby the person(s) maintaining the alarm can be located; (c). name, address, telephone number or other means of locating a minimum of two persons who can be contacted on a 24 hour-a-day basis in case of alarm or malfunction. (d). any additional relevant information requested by the Chief of Police or Fire Chief of Roanoke County; (e). execution of a release of liability by the User or by an officer or authorized agent of the User. Any material misstatement of fact made by any applicant 6 .~= ~ Sec 16-25. Deactivation of Existing Alarms - Prohibited Alarms a. Any User which has its Alarm System connected to the Public Safety Center on the effective date of this ordinance shall, 30 days after receipt of written communication from the Chief of Police, disconnect any alarm terminating therein. Failure to disconnect will result in said alarm being disconnected by the County without liability, at the owners expense. b. After the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person to install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or service which is programmed to transmit a prerecorded message or code signal directly from a residence, premises or dwelling to any telephone number assigned to the Public Safety Center, Police, or Fire and Rescue Departments, or to install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or other Security or Fire Alarm System in violation of the provision of this ordinance. c. Alarms may be connected to an Alarm Board located in the Public Safety Center only with the express written approval of the Chief of Police and the Fire Chief of Roanoke County. d. Nothing contained herein will prohibit any Person or User from installing an Alarm System which terminates with a commercial or other alarm monitoring and answering service. e. A User of a local Alarm shall adjust the mechanism of any Alarm or cause such mechanism to be adjusted so that an alarm signal shall not sound for longer than 30 minutes after being activated. 8 f. After the effective date of this ordinance, no Alarm System shall be installed in any premises within this county which does not have an independent source of power capable of providing an uninterrupted power supply to such alarm in conformity with thee manufactures specifications for that installation. In the absence of any such manufactures specification, the Alarm System shall provide a minimum of eight hours of independent power supply. Sec 16-26. False Alarm Fees a. Users shall be allowed four false alarms, without fees, in any calendar year. For each false alarm beyond the four permitted by this section, there will be fees levied against the User, except as follows: 1. No fee shall be charged for a false alarm if, prior to dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department to the scene of the alarm, the Public Safety Center is notified by the User or an authorized employee or agent of said User. 2. No fee shall be charged for a False Alarm when the User demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police, or designee, that said false alarm was generated by adverse weather conditions, or electrical or telephonic power failures or other causes which are identified and determined by the Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the User. (i) All fire False Alarms shall come under the jurisdiction of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in accordance with the Fire Prevention Code of the County of 9 "~ Roanoke as set forth in Article II of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code. b. If within any 12 month calendar period, there is a dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department in response to more than four false alarms, fees shall be assessed against the User for all subsequent dispatches in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Fifth Dispatch $ 25.00 2. Sixth Dispatch $ 50.00 3. Seventh Dispatch $100.00 4. Eighth and all subsequent Dispatches $150.00 The fees assessed by this section are intended to reflect the actual costs incurred by the County in providing alarm responses and in administering this Chapter and such fees shall be re- evaluated on an as-needed basis, c. Telephonic requests received for police, fire or rescue response to a protected premises or dwelling, from a third party alarm monitoring service that meet the criteria for "False Alarms" as defined by ordinance shall be subject to the false alarm fee schedule contained herein. The User shall be legally responsible for all fees or charges imposed thereunder. d. Any User experiencing a fourth False Alarm as defined in subsection a. above shall have their Alarm System inspected by an Alarm Company. This inspection shall include a complete examination of the Alarm System including, but not limited to, satisfactory design and installation of the alarm equipment, proper functioning 10 ,." of the Alarm and education of the User in the proper operation of the Alarm System. The Alarm Company shall record the details of this inspection on a form provided by the Police Department for this purpose. The completed inspection report shall be returned to the Police Department by the Alarm Company within seven days of the inspection. A copy of the completed inspection report shall be provided to the User by the Alarm Company at the same time. e. The Police Department shall notify a User of the requirements of subsection d by registered mail within 30 days of the fourth false alarm. If the inspection required by subsection d is not completed within 30 days of this notification, the User shall be liable to the County for an administrative service fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). f. The Roanoke County Police Department will be responsible for maintaining records of false alarms for billing purposes and shall forward such information to the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office on a monthly basis. g. In the event that a User fails to pay a false alarm fee or administrative service fee or both, levied under this Section within 30 days of the billing date used by the County Treasurer, the User shall be charged interest at the judgment rate from such billing date All such fees and charges shall be paid to the Roanoke County Treasurer. An appeal, as provided for below, shall suspend the running of such interest, but interest shall be due to Roanoke County as calculated from the date the fees or charges were originally billed in the event that such appeal is denied. 11 h. Any fees or charges, or both, collected under this Section shall be deposited in a capital improvement account for the benefit of the Roanoke County Public Safety Communications Center. Sec. 16-27. Administrative appeal procedure a.. Disputes over the number of False Alarms or assessment of fees may be reviewed by a panel consisting of the Chief of Police or designee, an Assistant County Administrator and the Building Commissioner upon receipt of a written request from the petitioner within five business days of receiving the bill. Decisions of this appeal panel shall be consistent with the purposes and intent of this ordinance. A consensus of the panel shall constitute the final decision which shall be communicated to the petitioner and Roanoke County Treasurer in writing. b. The administrative appeal panel shall consider the following factors in reaching a determination as to the appropriateness of a false alarm fee or administrative service fee: 1. Evidence of attempts by the User to eliminate the cause of False Alarms, including (i) installation of new equipment, (ii) replacement of defective equipment, (iii) inspection and repair of the system by an Alarm Company, and (iv) specific formal training of User. 2. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by electrical storm, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, or other act of God. 3. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by the disruption of telephone circuits beyond the control of the 12 ~'' ~ User or any Alarm Company or central monitoring agency and that the cause of such disruption has been corrected. 4. Written evidence that the Alarm System which caused the alarm responses has been disconnected and removed from the premises. Sec. 16-28. Authority of Department of Fire and Rescue This Article shall not be interpreted to limit the authority of the Department of Fire and Rescue and the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County to enforce any provision of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as incorporated in Article II of Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and Protection", of the Roanoke County Code regarding Alarms Systems or False Alarms. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after January 1, 1992. c:\wp5 ] \agenda\code\firealrm.ord 13 r g-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE 111991-13 AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE IV, SEWER USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE OF 1985 (formerly, Article III, of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971). WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement entered into by and between, and still binding upon, Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations as necessary to conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they pertain to Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance # 62486-146, § 1, adopted on June 24, 1986, Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 was amended to add an Article III relative to sewer use standards and by Ordinance # 91289- 14, adopted on September 12, 1989, said Article was further amended; and WHEREAS, recent regulatory requirements enacted by the State Water Control Board and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency have necessitated changes by the City of Roanoke to its Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, the operative requirements of the current Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke requires amendment of the County's ordinances to bring them into conformity with the current Roanoke City Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 1991, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1991, and continued to November 19, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 1. That the amended "SEWER USE STANDARDS" be reenacted as "ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS" of CHAPTER 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985. CHAPTER 18 ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS Sec. 18-151 Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases set out in this section shall have the following meanings: Act means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., as amended. Approving Authority for purposes of this Article only shall mean the county administrator or his duly authorized representative and shall be ectuivalent to control authority. BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) means the quantity of oxygen by weight, expressed in mg/1, utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory conditions for five (5) days at a temperature of twenty (20) degrees centigrade. Building sewer means the extension from the building drain to the public sewer or other place of disposal (also called house lateral and house connection). Categorical Standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatment Standard. Capital costs means a sum sufficient recovered by user charges computed by using the capital recover factor for the average life of all capital items including capitalized O & M charges (unless collected separately) 2 on which expenditures have been made or will have to be made for wastewater treatment facilities, processes or transmission lines. Capital costs may be adjusted from time to time to reflect cost experience. Categorical standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatment Standard. Class I user means any person discharging normal domestic wastewater into a sanitary sewer and any industrial user discharging Group B wastewater into the sanitary sewer. Class II user means any person discharging Group A wastewater into a sanitary sewer. COD (chemical oxygen demand) means the measure, expressed in mg/1, of the oxygen consuming capacity of inorganic and organic matter present in water or wastewater, expressing the amount of oxygen consumed from a chemical oxidant in a specific test, but not differentiating between stable and unstable organic matter and thus not necessarily correlating with biochemical oxygen demand. COD-BOD ratio means the ratio of the value of COD to BOD as these values are defined above. COD (soluble) means the COD of the filtrate from wastewater that is filtered through a gooch crucible as required by the suspended solids test in "Standard Methods." Control manhole means a manhole giving access to a building sewer at some point before the building sewer discharge mixes with other 3 discharges in the public sewer. Control point means a point of access to a course of discharge before the discharge mixes with other discharges in the public sewer. County means Roanoke County . Discharge means any introduction of substances into the sanitary sewer. Garbage means animal and vegetable wastes and residue from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the handling, processing, storage and sale of food products and produce. Group A wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers in which any one of the parameters below are more than the given loading: Average Daily Parameter Monthly Composite Total suspended solids (TSS) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day Total phosphorus (TP) 3.75 lbs./day 4.5 lbs./day Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) 4.50 lbs./day 5.4 lbs./day Group B wastewater means the discharge of permitted industrial wastewater not otherwise qualifying as Group A wastewater. Incompatible waste means a waste which is not susceptible to adequate treatment by the wastewater treatment plant. Industrial user means any user of publicly owned treatment works identified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, 4 Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under divisions A, B,D, E, and I, including governmental facilities that discharge wastewater to the plant. Industrial waste means waste resulting from any process of industry, manufacturing, trade or business from the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of the waste with water or normal wastewater, or distinct from normal wastewater. Infiltration means water entering a sewer system, including service connections from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from inflow. Inflow means water discharged into a sewer system, including service connections, from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters, or drainage. It does not include, and is distinguished from infiltration. Interference means a discharge which, along or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, (1) inhibits or disrupts the plant, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; or (2) causes a violation of the plant's VPDES permit. Milligrams per liter (mg/1) means the same as parts per million and is a weight-to-volume ratio; the milligram-per liter value multiplied by the factor 8.34 shall be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water. 5 National categorical pretreatment standard or pretreatment standard means any regulations containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 1317) and 40 C.F.R. Subchapter N (Parts 401-471) as amended, which applies to a specific category of industrial users. Natural outlet means any outlet into a watercourse, ditch, lake or other body of surface water or ground water. Normal wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers in which the average concentration of total suspended solids and BOD is not more than 250 mg/1, total phosphorus is not more than 15 mg/1, total Kjeldahl nitrogen is not more than 18 mg/1 and total flow is not more than 25,000 gallons per day. Overload means the imposition of organic or hydraulic loading on a treatment facility in excess of its engineered design capacity. Pass through means a discharge which exits the plant into water of the United States in quantities which may cause a violation of the plant's VPDES permit. Person includes individual, corporation, organization, government or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership association and any other legal entity. pH means the logarithm (base 10) of the reciprocal of the hydrogen ion concentration expressed in grams per liter. Phosphorus (total) means the sum of the various types of phosphate expressed as elemental phosphorus. found in wastewater. The various 6 forms include ortho phosphate, condensed phosphates (pyro, meta, and poly-phosphates), and organically bound phosphates. The concentration of total phosphate is determined by the "Standard Methods" test procedure. Plant means the City of Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant, e~ Public sewer means pipe or conduit carrying wastewater or unpolluted drainage in which owners of abutting properties shall have the use, subject to control by the County. Sanitary sewer means a public sewer that conveys domestic wastewater or industrial wastes or a combination of both, and into which storm water, surface water, groundwater and other unpolluted wastes are not intentionally passed. Slug means any discharge of water, wastewater or industrial waste which, in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow, exceeds, for any period longer than fifteen (15) minutes, more than five (5) times the average twenty-four (24) hour concentration or flows during normal operation. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) means classification pursuant to the Standard Industrial Classification Manual issued by the Executive Office of *_-~re~es~e~~~Pf-~e~e a Management and Budget, 1987, as amended. Standard Methods means the examination and analytical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as prepared, 7 ti approved and published jointly by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. Storm sewer means a public sewer which carries storm and surface water and drainage and into which domestic wastewater or industrial wastes are not intentionally passed. Storm water means rainfall or any other forms of precipitation. Suspended solids means solids measured in mg/1 that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, wastewater or other liquids, and which are largely removable by a laboratory filtration device. To discharge includes to deposit, conduct, drain, emit, throw, run, allow to seep or otherwise release or dispose of, or to allow, permit or suffer any of these acts or omissions. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen means the combined ammonia and organic nitrogen in a given wastewater, as measured by the "Standard Methods" test procedure. It does not include nitrite and nitrate nitrogen. Trap means a device designed to skim, settle or otherwise remove grease, oil, sand, flammable wastes or other harmful substances. Unpolluted wastewater means water containing: (1) No fee or emulsified grease or oil. (2) No acids or alkalis. (3) No phenols or other substances producing taste or odor in receiving water. (4) No toxic or poisonous substances in suspension, colloidal state or solution. 8 (5) No noxious or otherwise obnoxious or odorous gases. (6) Not more than ten (10) mg/1 each of suspended solids and BOD. (7) Color not exceeding fifty (50) units, as measured by the Platinum-Cobalt method of determination, as specified in "Standard Methods." User charge means the charge made to those persons who discharge normal wastewater into the County's sewage system. This charge shall include a proportionate share of any capital improvements to the system (capital costs). User surcharge means the charge made, in excess of the user charge, for all wastewater over and above the loading defined as normal wastewater. Waste means rejected, unutilized or superfluous substances, in liquid, gaseous or solid form, resulting from domestic, agricultural or industrial activities. Wastewater means a combination of the water-carried waste from residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments, together with any ground, surface and storm water that may be present. Wastewater facilities includes all facilities for collection, pumping, treating and disposing of wastewater and industrial wastes. Wastewater service charge means the charge. on all users of the public sewer whose wastes are treated at the plant and is the appropriate sum of the user charge and user surcharge. Wastewater treatment plant means any municipal-owned facilities, devices and structures used for receiving, processing and treating wastewater, 9 industrial waste and sludges from the sanitary sewers. Wastecourse means a natural or man-made channel in which a flow of water occurs, either continuously or intermittently. Sec. 18-152. General Requirements. (a) All discharges into public sewers shall conform to requirements of this article; however, the federal categorical pretreatment standards or any standards imposed by the state water control board or its successor in authority are hereby incorporated by reference where applicable and where such standards are more stringent than those set forth in this article. J No significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approving authority shall discharge industrial wastewaters into the sanitarv sewer system without an appropriate industrial waste discharge permit as provided in this article. (c) Unless exception is granted by the approving authority or by other provisions of this chapter, the public sewer system shall be used by all persons discharging wastewater, industrial waste, polluted liquids or unpolluted waters or liquids. (d) Unless authorized by the State Water Control Board or its successor in authority, no person shall deposit or discharge any waste included in subsection (c) of this section on public or private property in or adjacent to any natural outlet, watercourse, storm sewer or other area within the jurisdiction of the County. (e) The approving authority shall determine, prior to discharge, 10 that wastes to be discharged will receive such treatment as is required by the laws, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders of federal, state and local authorities, or such discharge shall not be permitted. (f) Each industrial user discharging industrial waste waters into the sanitary sewer system shall provide protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other substances regulated by this Article. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials shall be provided and maintained at the owner or user's own cost and expense. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the approving authority before construction of the facility. All such existing users shall complete such a plan by July 1, 1986. No such user who commences operation after the effective date of this section shall be permitted to introduce pollutants into the system until accidental discharge procedures have been so approved. Review and approval of such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the industrial user from the responsibility to modify the user's facility as necessary to meet the requirements of this Article. In the case of an accidental discharge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone and notify the approving authority of the incident. The notification shall include location of discharge, type of waste, concentration and volume and corrective actions. Within five (5) days following an accidental discharge; the user shall submit to the approving authority a detailed written report describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall 11 t not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage to the sewer system or treatment plant, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by this article or other applicable law. A notice shall be permanently posted on the user's bulletin board or other prominent place advising employees whom to call in the event of a dangerous discharge. Employers shall insure that all employees who may cause or suffer such a dangerous discharge to occur are advised of the emergency notification procedure. (g) In the event of an emergency, as determined by the approving authority, the approving authority shall be authorized to immediately halt any actual or threatened discharge. (h) A person discharging in violation of the provisions of this article, within thirty (30) days of the date of such discharge, shall sample, analyze and submit the data to the approving authority unless the approving authority elects to perform such sampling. Sec. 18-153. Prohibited Discharges Generally. (a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any waste which, by itself or by interaction with other wastes, may: (1) Injure or interfere with wastewater treatment processes or facilities; (2) Constitute a hazard to humans or animals; or (3) Create a hazard in receiving waters of the wastewater treatment plant effluent. 12 j4Z Generate heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the plant resulting in interference, and in no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Celsius (one hundred four (104) degrees Fahrenheit) unless the approving authority approves alternate temperature limits. (b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain: (1) Antifreeze. (2) Fluoride other than that contained in the public water supply greater than 10.0 mg/1. (3 ) Eh-~e~-ie~Ps i-~-ee~~~~z-ears g~e~ Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX) greater than 5.0 mg/1. (4 ) ~s~9~li~"c~~-ircEl~ , , e~eiT-9iQ-6-t-~i.., c ~ .. ..',. ~ .. ' , Flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas in hazardous amounts. (5) Substances causing a chemical oxygen demand (COD) greater than 1,500 mg/1 in the wastewater. (6) Strong acid or concentrated plating solutions, whether neutralized or not. (7) Fats, wax, grease or oils, whether emulsified or not, in excess of 100 mg/1 or containing substances which may solidify or become viscous at temperatures between thirty-two (32°) degrees and one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (0° and 65° Centigrade). 13 (8) Obnoxious, toxic or poisonous solids, liquids, or gases in quantities sufficient to violate the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. (9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a Ph lower than 5.5 or higher than 9.5, or any other substance with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment or personnel at the wastewater facility. (10) Substances which cause a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5. (11) Waste, wastewater or any other substance containing phenols, hydrogen sulfide or other taste-and-odor producing substances that have not been minimized. After treatment of the composite wastewater, effluent concentration limits may not exceed the requirements established by state, federal or other agencies with jurisdiction over discharges to receiving waters. 12 Antimony and beryllium greater than 1.0 mct/1. Sec. 18-154. Technical based local limits. (a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods" are: 14 (1) Arsenic: ^~-~~~ .25 mg/1 (2) Barium: 5.0 mg/1 (3) Boron: ~ 1.0 mg/1 (4) Cadmium: 0.02 mg/1 (5) Chromium, Total: ~ 2.0 mq/1 (6) Chromium VI: .011 mq~ -f6} S7~ Copper: 1.0 mg/1 {-~} ~ Lead: ~ .2 mg/1 -(~} _( 9_L Manganese : 1.0 mg/1 -f 9-} 10 Mercury: 0.005 mg/1 -(~6-} 11 Nickel: j~ 2.0 mg/1 -~1~} 12 Selenium: 0.02 mg/1 {~} 13 Silver: 0.1 mg/1 {~} 14 Z inc : 2 .0 mg/ 1 -F~} 15 Cyanide : 1. 0 mg/ 1 In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment plant, an adjustment in the give n parameter concentration limit will be required. To accomplish this, the industrial discharge permits for industries discharging the par ticular compound will be adjusted to insure compliance. (c) No other heavy metals or toxic materials shall be discharged into public sewers without a permit from the approving authority specifying conditions of pretreatment, concentrations, volumes and other applicable provisions. (d) Prohibited toxic materials include, but are 15 not limited to: {3-~-~~~ {~}- ~, Herbicides. ~-~} j2Z Fungicides. {~} S3~ Pesticides. Sec. 18-155. Discharge of garbage. (a) No person may discharge garbage into public sewers, unless it is shredded to a degree that all particles can be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers. Particles greater than one-half inch in any dimension are prohibited. (b) The approving authority shall have the right to review and approve the installation and operation of any garbage grinder equipped with a motor of three-fourths horsepower (0.76 hp metric) or greater. Sec. 18-156. Discharge of storm water and other unpolluted drainage. (a) No person shall discharge into public sanitary sewers: (1) Unpolluted storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage. 16 {~}-~ Other unpolluted drainage. (b) The approving authority shall designate storm sewers and other watercourses into which unpolluted drainage described in subsection (a) of this section may be discharged. Sec. 18-157. Temperature of discharges. No person shall discharge liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (65° Centigrade), or any substance which causes the temperature of the total wastewater treatment plant influent to increase at a rate of ten (10) degrees Fahrenheit or more per hour, or a combined total increase of plant influent temperature to one hundred four (104) degrees Fahrenheit. Sec. 18-158. Discharge of radioactive wastes. (a) No person shall discharge radioactive wastes or isotopes into public sewers, without the permission of the approving authority. (b) The approving authority reserves the right to establish, in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations, regulations for discharge of radioactive waste into public sewers. Sec. 18-159 Discharge of substances capable of impairing, etc. facilities. (a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance capable of causing: (1) Obstruction to the flow in sewers; (2) Interference with the operation of treatment processes or facilities; or (3) Excessive loading of treatment facilities. 17 (b) Discharges prohibited by subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, materials which exert or cause concentrations of: (1) ~z Inert suspended solids greater than 250 mg/1 including, but not limited to Fuller's earth, lime slurries and lime residues. (2) Dissolved solids greater than 500 mg/1 including, but not limited to sodium chlorine and sodium sulfate. (3) Excessive discoloration including, but not limited to dye wastes and vegetable tanning solutions. (4) Wastes having a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5 to 1. Industries having wastewater of this nature shall provide pretreatment as required by the approving authority. (c) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance that may: (1) Deposit grease or oil in the sewer lines in such a manner as to clog the sewers; (2) Overload skimming and grease handling equipment; (3) Pass to the receiving waters without being effectively treated by normal wastewater treatment processes due to the nonamenability of the substance to bacterial action; or (4) Deleteriously affect the treatment process due to excessive quantities. (d) No person shall discharge incompatible waste into public sewers which: 18 (1) Is not amenable to treatment or reduction by the wastewater treatment processes and facilities employed; or (2) Is amenable to treatment only to such a degree that the treatment plant effluent cannot meet the requirements of other agencies having jurisdiction over discharges to the receiving waters. Subsection (b) (3) of this section illustrates the types of substances intended to be regulated by this subsection. (e) The approving authority shall regulate the flow and concentration of slugs when they may: (1) Impair the treatment process; (2) Cause damage to collection facilities; (3) Incur treatment costs exceeding those for normal wastewater; or (4) Render the waste unfit for stream disposal or industrial use. Industrial operations which, on occasion, release sludges of waterborne wastes into the sewers, or which, on occasion, release any significant quantities of materials which adversely influence the effectiveness of treatment in the wastewater treatment plant shall notify the plant in advance of their release, and shall control, at the discretion of the approving authority, the rate of release of these wastes. Permission for such planned releases shall not be unreasonably withheld. Persons failing to comply with these requirements shall be subject to a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per incident, and shall 19 also be liable for the payment of any damages caused, either directly or indirectly, by the unapproved discharge. (f) No person shall discharge into public sewers solid or viscous substances which violate subsection (a)of this section, if present in sufficient quantity or size, including but not limited to: (1) Ashes. (2) Cinders. (3) Sand. (4) Mud. (5) Straw. (6) Shavings. (7) Metal. (8) Glass. (9) Rags. (10) Feathers. (11) Tar. (12) Plastics. (13) Wood. (14) Unground garbage. (15) Whole blood. (16) Paunch manure. (17) Hair and fleshings. (18) Entrails. (19) Paper products, either whole or ground by garbage grinders (20) Slops. 20 (21) Chemical residues. (22) Paint residues. (23) Bulk solids. (g) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants which cause interference or pass through. (h) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants with a high flow rate or concentration of conventional pollutants as to interfere with the plant. Sec. 18-160. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to reject discharges. (a) If discharges or proposed discharges into public sewers may deleteriously affect wastewater facilities, processes, equipment or receiving waters; create a hazard to life or health; or create a public nuisance; the approving authority shall require: (1) Pretreatment to an acceptable condition before discharge into the public sewers; (2) Control over the quantities and rates of discharge; and (3) Payment to cover the cost of handling and treating the wastes, in addition to capital costs. (b) The approving authority shall reject wastes when he determines that a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection (a) of this section and the discharger does not meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (c) No person shall utilize dilution as a means of treatment. (d) The app roving authority shall have the ri ght to determine whether a dischar ge or p roposed discharge is included under subsection 21 (a) of this section. Sec. 18-161. Desiqn, installation and maintenance of pretreatment and control facilities. (a) If pretreatment or control is required, the approving authority may, at his sole discretion, require, review and approve the design and installation of equipment and processes. The design and installation of such equipment and processes shall conform to all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and other laws, including Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. (b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring pretreatment, flow-equalizing or other facilities shall provide and maintain the facilities in effective operating condition at this own expense. Sec.18-162. Requirements for traps. (a) Discharges requiring a trap include: (1) Grease or waste containing grease in excessive amounts; (2) Oil; (3) Sand; (4) Flammable wastes; and (5) Other harmful substances. (b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring a trap shall, at his own expense and as required by the approving authority: (1) Provide equipment and facilities of a type and capacity approved by the approving authority; (2) Locate the trap in a manner that provides ready and easy accessibility for cleaning and inspection; and (3) Maintain the trap in effective operating condition. 22 Sec. 18-163. Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of discharges. (a) The owner of each facility discharging other than normal wastewater or discharging Class A wastewater shall submit monthly, or at such other frequency as may be required by the approving authority, to the County, on forms supplied by the County, a certified statement of the quantities of its wastes discharged into the sewers and sewage works of the County or into any sewer connected therewith. Copies of pertinent water bills may be required to be submitted with the above statement. Such documents shall be filed with the County not later than the tenth day of the following month. A separate statement shall be filed for each industrial plant. The total quantities of wastes to be measured and certified by the person so discharging shall be established by the approving authority and shall, as a minimum, include: (1) Liquid in gallons. (2) Five-day BOD in pounds. (3) Suspended solids in pounds, on a dry solids basis. (4) Total phosphorus in pounds. (5) Total Kjeldahl nitrogen in pounds. (6) COD in pounds. (b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement, test, sampling, or analysis required to be made hereunder shall be made in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 136, as amended. (c) In order to provide for accurate sampling and measurement of industrial wastes, each person discharging Class A wastewater shall provide and maintain, on each of its industrial waste outlet sewers, a large manhole or sampling chamber to be located outside or near its 23 plant boundary line, where feasible. If inside the plant fence, there shall be a gate near the sampling chamber with a key furnished to the County. There shall be ample room provided in each sampling chamber to enable convenient inspection and sampling by the County. (d) Each sampling chamber shall contain a Parshall flume, accurate weir or similar device, with a recording and totalizing register for measurement of the liquid quantity; or the metered water supply to the industrial plant may be used as the liquid quantity, where it is substantiated that the metered water supply and waste quantities are approximately the same, or where a measurable adjustment can be made in the metered supply to determine the liquid quantity. (e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly refrigerated and composited in proportion to the flow for a representative twenty-four (24)hours sample. For oil and grease, pH, phenols, cyanide, volatile toxic organic and other appropriate pollutants, property grab sampling shall be performed. Each sampling shall be repeated on as many days as necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire reporting period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in quantities of wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced automatically by the flow-measuring device. (f) Minimum requirements for representative quantities under this section shall include re-evaluation during each twelve (12) month period. The determination of representative quantities shall include not less than seven (7) consecutive days of twenty-four (24) hour composite samplings, taken during periods of normal operation, together with acceptable flow measurements. The frequency of sampling, sampling 24 chamber, metering device, sampling methods and analyses of samples shall be subject, at any time, to inspection and verification by the County. Sampling and measuring facilities shall be such as to provide safe access for authorized personnel of the County for making such inspection and verification. (g) Plans for sampling chambers, with their locations shown on a site plan, shall be submitted to the County for approval. (h) All owners of facilities governed by this section shall also comply with any applicable Monitoring Requirements and Regulations established by the approving authority which are hereby incorporated by reference. (i) All owners of facilities governed by this article shall comply with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 as amended, which is incorporated by reference herein, including, without limitation, the signatory, certification and record keeping requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 (c),(d), (i), and (1). All records shall be retained for a minimum of three years and this retention period shall be extended during litigation or upon request of the approving authority. Sj.,1 Samt~linct for discharge limit compliance shall be taken at the sampling chamber without any dilution factor except for proUerly classified catectorical or significant users. ik~ Sampling for prohibited materials may be collected_at either the sampling chamber or end of process to determine the absence of the prohibited material. Sec. 18-164. Discharge permits for industrial waste. 25 J- C i. L. ' ~ cu v - / ~ ~ ~ ' ~ a te ~ ' } O •7 ~ -TtTG RATITrG[-1 i[[u.~ a . r / ~ 9t-s~i~i°E~S ~ i ~ 26 (a) It shall be unlawful for any significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approving authority to dischar e industrial waste into the public sanitary sewer system -unless an appropriate Industrial Discharae Permit has been issued by the approvina authority In order to obtain an Industrial Discharae Permit, such person shall. ~_ Submit a complete application at least ninety (90) days prior to the date proposed for initial discharae on forms suQplied by the approving authority The approvina authority will act upon the application within sixty (60) days. ~_ Comply- with all reauirements for the discharae permit including, but not limited to provisions for payment of charges, installation and operation of pretreatment facilities and samQling and analysis to determine ~antity and strength. X31 Provide a sampling point subject to the provisions of this article and approval of the approvina authority. i4~ Comply with the requirements of federal categorical standards, where applicable including the development of any required compliance schedules or the applicable provisions of this article. (b) An industrial user applying for a new discharge shall meet all conditions of subsection (a) of this section and shall secure a permit prior to discharging any waste. (c) A person not applying for a discharge permit within the 27 allotted time and continuing to discharge an unpermitted discharge shall be deemed to be in violation of this article. (d) A permit issued under this section shall be valid for up to five (5) years from its date of issuance, after which time the industrial user shall be required to obtain a new discharge permit. (e) The approving authority shall have the right to accept or reject any increases in flow or pollutants under existing or new permits. Sec. 18-165. Waiver or modification of requirements of article. The approving authority shall have the right to waive or modify, on an interim basis to be noted in any permit issued under this article, the requirements of this article as they pertain to strength of contaminants. No such waiver or modification shall be granted contrary to any County, state or federal regulation and no waiver or modification shall be granted, if it would result in the violation of the discharge permit for the plant, as it is now issued or as such permit may be amended. sec. 18-166. Charged generally. Persons making discharges of industrial waste shall pay a charge to cover the cost of collection and treatment in addition to capital costs. When a permit application for industrial waste is approved, the County or its authorized representative shall issue a permit stating: (a) The terms of acceptance by the County; and (b) The basis of payment. Sec. 18-167. User charges and added costs. (a) If the volume or character of the waste to be treated by the 28 plant meets the requirements of other provisions of this article and does not cause overloading of the sewage collection, treatment or disposal facilities of the County, the approving authority shall require that the discharger pay a charge to be determined from the schedule of charges which shall include capital costs. (b) If a proposed discharge of waste is responsible for exceeding the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities and the wastewater treatment plant must be upgraded, expanded or enlarged in order to treat the wastewater, the approving authority shall require that the discharger pay in full all added costs which shall include capital costs the County may incur due to acceptance of the wastewater. (c) The schedule of charges pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall include, but not be limited to: (1) Capital costs, including debt retirement and interest on debt, of the County's cost on all capital outlays for collecting and treating the waste, including new capital outlay and the proportionate part of the value of the existing system used in handling and treating waste. (2) Operation and maintenance costs (capitalized), including but not limited to, salaries and wages, power costs, costs of chemicals and supplies, proper allowances for maintenance, depreciation, overhead and office expense. Sec. 18-168. Schedule of charges. (a) Persons discharging wastewater shall pay a charge to cover the capital cost and the cost of collection and treatment of all wastewater discharged. 29 (1) All Class I users discharging normal wastewater or Group B wastewater shall pay a user charge computed upon cost per volume of wastewater discharged. (2) All Class II users discharging Group A wastewater shall have their user charge computed upon a cost per unit volume basis for the amount plus the unit cost of treatment for all over the base amount for volume, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (SS), phosphorus (P) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). In computing the contaminant loading, the parameter concentrations for normal wastewater will be considered as standard strength in determining the base amount in the effluent discharge flow. Initially, the responsibility for determining the contaminant loading for each category of establishment will be that of the approving authority. However, each establishment must verify its own contaminant loading monthly by initiating a sampling and analytical program at its own expense and with the approval of the approving authority. (b) The units costs to be used to compute the charge for Class I and II users shall be established by the approving authority. The unit costs for all users and the allowances for normal wastewater for users may be revised as necessary to correspond to current costs and experience. Revisions may be made, no more often than once a year, upon approval of the approving authority. The user charge for users shall be computed as follows: Class I Users: Cu = Vu x Vd 30 Class II Users: CS = Vu x Vd + VSVc + BSBc + SSSc + PSPc + NSNc And: Cu Charge for Class I users CS = Charge for Class II users V = Unit cost of treatment chargeable to normal wastewater ($/1,000 u gal.) Vd = Volume of wastewater from normal wastewater (1,000 gals.) V = Volume of Class II wastewater (1,000 gals.) in excess of Class I s wastewater Vc = Cost of treating 1,000 gals. of Class II wastewater ($/1,000 gal.) IJ3T` -~. ~i3 T T } e~IfLTG~~PD GeSlLZT77'Lt~rG~ ~1~e'~i ~e1 R..ZZ~'rg~ B - Class II wastewater BOD contribution in excess of Class I -s wastewater limit (lbs.) Bc = Cost of treating Class II BOD contribution ($/lb.) S =Class II wastewater SS contribution in excess of Class I wastewater s limit (lbs.) S'c = Cost of` treating Class II SS contribution ($/lb.) t'G-`C-i agZi eZ TrCA'~S2T~ /"1 l T T L. ...L....... ~ .~ +. ~ L. 1 ~ ...~. / C / 1 L. \ r wr IJYV1V1f l Y/ P - Class II wastewater phosphorus contribution in excess of Class I -s wastewater limit (lbs.) N =Class II wastewater unoxidized nitrogen contribution in excess of s Class I wastewater limit (lbs.) Nc = Cost of treating Class II nitrogen contribution ($/lb.) 31 Sec. 18-169. Adjustment of charges. (a) The county may adjust charges at least annually to reflect changes in the characteristics of wastewater based on the results of sampling and testing. This adjustment will correspond to charges established by the operating authority for the treatment plant. (b) The county shall review at least annually the basis for determining charges and shall adjust the unit treatment cost in the formula to reflect increases or decreases in wastewater treatment costs based on the previous year's experience. Sec. 18-170. Billing and payment of charges. (a) The county may bill the discharger by the month or by the quarter and shall show waste charges as a separate item on the regular bill for water and sewer charges. The discharger shall pay in accordance with practices existing for payment of sewer charges. (b) In addition to sanctions provided for by this article, the County is entitled to exercise sanctions provided for by the other ordinances of the County for failure to pay the bill for water and sanitary sewer service when due. Sec. 18-171. Right of entry to enforce article. (a) The approving authority and other duly authorized employees of the County bearing proper credentials and identification shall be authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of enforcing this article for sampling purposes, inspect monitoring equipment and to inspect and copy all documents relevant to the enforcement of this article, including, without limitation, monitoring reports. Anyone acting under this authority 32 shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection. ~~.~, ~~- ~_ Appropriate information submitted to the approvinct authority ,pursuant to these regulations excluding any information utilized in determining effluent limits may be claimed as confidential by the submitter at the time of submission by stampinu the words "confidential business information" on each page containing such information. If a claim is asserted the information shall be treated in accordance with applicable law. (c) No person acting under authority of this section may inquire into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining, ceramic, paper or other industries, beyond that point having a direct bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the public sewers. G1Ci llll 1V uuv~.i r~..w, v~~v ,r~~~~~~.. ~.~~___ ______ 33 Sec. 18-172. Authority to disconnect service. (a) The county reserves the right to terminate water and wastewater disposal services and disconnect a customer from the system and revoke any discharge permit issued under this article when: (1) Acids or chemicals damaging to sewer lines or treatment process are released into the sewer causing rapid deterioration of these structures or interfering with proper conveyance and treatment of wastewater; (2) A governmental agency informs the County that the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is no longer a quality permitted for discharge into a watercourse, and it is found that the customer is delivering wastewater to the County's system that cannot be sufficiently treated or requires treatment that is not provided by the County as normal domestic treatment; or (3) The customer: a. Discharges industrial waste or wastewater that is in violation of the permit issued by the approving authority; b. Discharges wastewater at an uncontrolled, variable rate in sufficient quantity to cause an imbalance in the wastewater treatment system; c. Fails to pay bills for water and sanitary sewer services when due; or d. Repeats a discharge of prohibited wastes into public sewers. 34 (4) The permittee has engaged in fraudulent reporting to the approval authority or failed to report adequately as required changes in discharge. (b) If the service is disconnected pursuant to subsection (a) (2) of this section, the County shall: (1) Disconnect the customer; (2) Supply the customer with the governmental agency's report and provide the customer with all pertinent information; and (3) Continue disconnection until such time as the customer provides additional pretreatment or other facilities designed to remove the objectionable characteristics from this wastes. Sec. 18-173. Notice of violations The county shall serve persons discharging in violation of this article with written notice stating the nature of the violation and requiring immediate satisfactory compliance. The approving authority shall have the authority to publish annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the Roanoke area a list of persons which were not in compliance with the terms of this Article at least once during the twelve (12) previous months. Sec. 18-17d. Penalty for violations. (a) A person who violates the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation per day and confinement in jail for not more than twelve months, either or both. In the event of a violation, the approving authority shall also have the right to terminate the sewer and waSer connection. (b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-section (a) of this section, the County is entitled to pursue all other criminal and civil remedies to which it is entitled under authority of state statues or other ordinances of the County against a person continuing prohibited discharges, including, without limitation, injunctive relief. ~ Any person who knowingly makes anv false statements, representations or certifications in anv application record, report, plan or other document files required to be maintained pursuant to this ordinance, or wastewater permit or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate anv monitoring device or method required under this ordinance shall upon conviction be punishable by a fine of $1 000 00 per violation, per day or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both. ~_ The approving authority shall be authorized to implement such other ro ram and enforcement mechanisms as are consistent with regulatory guidelines and are deemed appropriate. Sec. 18-175. Payment of costs for work required by prohibited deposits. In any case where a sewer main or pipe connection is stopped, damaged or choked by any materials or rubbish being deposited therein contrary to the provisions of this article, by any tenant or property owner, upon due ascertainment by the County Administrator, he shall cause the main pipe connection or manhole to be opened, cleaned, replaced or repaired, and shall cause the cost for doing such work to be collected from the property owner. The payment of such cost shall not relieve any person from prosecution for a violation of this article. Sec. 18-176. Public access to data. 36 Effluent data complied as part of the approving authority's pretreatment program shall be available to the public. 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after December 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk Familv Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Chief Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 37 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Continuation of Second Reading for Ordinance Amending Article III, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 (Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~~,~,~,.~,~ .~~~ ~~ BACKGROUND' The 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and Roanoke County requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations that conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they pertain to Sewer Use Standards. The County of Roanoke adopted Ordinance 62486-146 on June 24, 1986 and Ordinance 91289-14 amending Ordinance 62486-146 on September 12, 1989 in order to meet the above requirements. Recent requirements of the State Water Control Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have required the City of Roanoke to amend their Sewer Use Standards. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Sewer Use Standards that are required so that our Ordinance conforms to the form and intent of the City of Roanoke Ordinance which was adopted on October 14, 1991. Section 153 and 154 of the Ordinance is amended to eliminate Bismuth, Cobalt, Molybdenum, Rhenium, Strontium, Tellurium, and Uranium Ion from regulated status and increase the discharge limits for Anitimony and Beryllium from prohibited to 1.0 mg/l. The above amendments include the items requested by County users at the public hearing. The first reading of this Ordinance was held on July 9, 1991 and a second reading was held on July 23, 1991. Adoption was withheld pending the adoption by the City of their Ordinance to include the above mentioned items. Z"- 3 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: There is no practical alternative to adopting this Ordinance. Adoption is required by the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Ordinance be adopted after the second reading with an effective date of November 20, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: .1 ~~' ) Cliffo raig, P. . Utility Director APPROVED: ~,~ ~~J Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE IV, SEWER USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE OF 1985 (formerly, Article III, of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971). WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement entered into by and between, and still binding upon, Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations as necessary to conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they pertain to Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance # 62486-146, § 1, adopted on June 24, 1986, Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 was amended to add an Article III relative to sewer use standards and by Ordinance # 91289- 14, adopted on September 12, 1989, said Article was further amended; and WHEREAS, recent regulatory requirements enacted by the State Water Control Board and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency have necessitated changes by the City of Roanoke to its Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, the operative requirements of the current Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke requires amendment of the County's ordinances to bring them into conformity with the current Roanoke City Sewer Use Standards; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 1991, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1991, and continued to November 19, 1991. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 ~A 1. That the amended "SEWER USE STANDARDS" be reenacted as "ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS" of CHAPTER 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985. CHAPTER 18 ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS Sec. 18-151 Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases set out in this section shall have the following meanings: Act means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., as amended. Approving Authority for purposes of this Article only shall mean the county administrator or his duly authorized representative and shall be equivalent to control authority. BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) means the quantity of oxygen by weight, expressed in mg/1, utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory conditions for five (5) days at a temperature of twenty (20) degrees centigrade. Building sewer means the extension from the building drain to the public sewer or other place of disposal (also called house lateral and house connection). Categorical Standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatment Standard. Capital costs means a sum sufficient recovered by user charges computed by using the capital recover factor for the average life of all capital items including capitalized O & M charges (unless collected separately) on which expenditures have been made or will have to be made for 2 ~ =3 wastewater treatment facilities, processes or transmission lines. Capital costs may be adjusted from time to time to reflect cost experience. Categorical standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatmefar Standard. Class I user means any person discharging normal domestic wastewater into a sanitary sewer and any industrial user discharging Group B wastewater into the sanitary sewer. Class II user means any person discharging Group A wastewater into a sanitary sewer. COD (chemical oxygen demand) means the measure, expressed in mg/1, of the oxygen consuming capacity of inorganic and organic matter present in water or wastewater, expressing the amount of oxygen consumed from a chemical oxidant in a specific test, but not differentiating between stable and unstable organic matter and thus not necessarily correlating with biochemical oxygen demand. COD-BOD ratio means the ratio of the value of COD to BOD as these values are defined above. COD (soluble) means the COD of the filtrate from wastewater that is filtered through a gooch crucible as required by the suspended solids test in "Standard Methods." Control manhole means a manhole giving access to a building sewer at some point before the building sewer discharge mixes with other discharges in the public sewer. Control point means a point of access to a course of discharge before 3 ~~ the discharge mixes with other discharges in the public sewer. County means Roanoke County. Discharge means any introduction of substances into the sanitary sewer. Garbage means animal and vegetable wastes and residue from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the handling, processing, storage and sale of food products and produce. GroupA wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers in which any one of the parameters below are more than the given loading: Average Daily Parameter Monthly Composite Total suspended solids (TSS) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day Total phosphorus (TP) 3.75 lbs./day 4.5 lbs./day Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) 4.50 lbs./day 5.4 lbs./day Group B wastewater means the discharge of permitted industrial wastewater not otherwise qualifying as Group A wastewater. Incompatible waste means a waste which is not susceptible to adequate treatment by the wastewater treatment plant. Industrial user means any user of publicly owned treatment works identified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under divisions A, B,D, E, and I, including governmental facilities that discharge wastewater to the plant. 4 ,~" ,~"` Industrial waste means waste resulting from any process of industry, manufacturing, trade or business from the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of the waste with water or normal wastewater, or distinct from normal wastewater. Infiltration means water entering a sewer system, including service connections from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from inflow. Inflow means water discharged into a sewer system, including service connections, from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar,yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters, or drainage. It does not include, and is distinguished from infiltration. Interference means a discharge which, along or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, (1) inhibits or disrupts the plant, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; or (2) causes a violation of the plant's VPDES permit. Milligrams per liter (mg/1) means the same as parts per million and is a weight-to-volume ratio; the milligram-per liter value multiplied by the factor 8.34 shall be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water. ,National categorical pretreatment standard or pretreatment standard means any regulations containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 1317) 5 ...~ and 40 C.F.R. Subchapter N (Parts 401-471) as amended, which applies to a specific category of industrial users. Natural outlet means any outlet into a watercourse, ditch, lake or other body of surface water or ground water. Normal wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers in which the average concentration of total suspended solids and BOD is not more than 250 mg/1, total phosphorus is not more than 15 mg/1, total Kjeldahl nitrogen is not more than 18 mg/1 and total flow is not more than 25,000 gallons per day. Overload means the imposition of organic or hydraulic loading on a treatment facility in excess of its engineered design capacity. Pass through means a discharge which exits the plant into water of the United States in quantities which may cause a violation of the plant's VPDES permit. Person includes individual, corporation, organization, government or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership association and any other legal entity. pH means the logarithm (base 10) of the reciprocal of the hydrogen ion concentration expressed in grams per liter. Phosphorus (total) means the sum of the various types of phosphate expressed as elemental phosphorus found in wastewater. The various forms include ortho phosphate, condensed phosphates (pyro, meta, and poly-phosphates), and organically bound phosphates. The concentration of total phosphate is determined by the "Standard Methods" test procedure. 6 1 ~~ Plant means the City of Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant, e~ Public sewer means pipe or conduit carrying wastewater or unpolluted drainage in which owners of abutting properties shall have the use, subject to control by the County. Sanitary sewer means a public sewer that conveys domestic wastewater or industrial wastes or a combination of both, and into which storm water, surface water, groundwater and other unpolluted wastes are not intentionally passed. Slug means any discharge of water, wastewater or industrial waste which, in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow, exceeds, for any period longer than fifteen (15) minutes, more than five (5) times the average twenty-four (24) hour concentration or flows during normal operation. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) means classification pursuant to the Standard Industrial Classification Manual issued by the Executive Office of t-~i~res}ei '- , ^" ' ee-e Management and Budctet 1987 as amended. Standard Methods means the examination and analytical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as prepared, approved and published jointly by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. Storm sewer means a public sewer which carries storm and surface water 7 ~-- and drainage and into which domestic wastewater or industrial wastes are not intentionally passed. Storm water means rainfall or any other forms of precipitation. Suspended solids means solids measured in mg/1 that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, wastewater or other liquids, and which are largely removable by a laboratory filtration device. To discharge includes to deposit, conduct, drain, emit, throw, run, allow to seep or otherwise release or dispose of, or to allow, permit or suffer any of these acts or omissions. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen means the combined ammonia and organic nitrogen in a given wastewater, as measured by the "Standard Methods" test procedure. It does not include nitrite and nitrate nitrogen. Trap means a device designed to skim, settle or otherwise remove grease, oil, sand, flammable wastes or other harmful substances. Unpolluted wastewater means water containing: (1) No fee or emulsified grease or oil. (2) No acids or alkalis. (3) No phenols or other substances producing taste or odor in receiving water. (4) No toxic or poisonous substances in suspension, colloidal state or solution. (5) No noxious or otherwise obnoxious or odorous gases. (6) Not more than ten (10) mg/1 each of suspended solids and BOD. (7) Color not exceeding fifty (50) units, as measured by the Platinum-Cobalt method of determination, as specified in 8 .. ,~ "Standard Methods." User charge means the charge made to those persons who discharge normal wastewater into the County's sewage system. This charge shall include a proportionate share of any capital improvements to the system (capital costs). User surcharge means the charge made, in excess of the user charge, for all wastewater over and above the loading defined as normal wastewater. Waste means rejected, unutilized or superfluous substances, in liquid, gaseous or solid form, resulting from domestic, agricultural or industrial activities. Wastewater means a combination of the water-carried waste from residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments, together with any ground, surface and storm water that may be present. Wastewater facilities includes all facilities for collection, pumping, treating and disposing of wastewater and industrial wastes. Wastewater service charge means the charge on all users of the public sewer whose wastes are treated at the plant and is the appropriate sum of the user charge and user surcharge. Wastewater treatment plant means any municipal-owned facilities, devices and structures used for receiving, processing and treating wastewater, industrial waste and sludges from the sanitary sewers. Wastecourse means a natural or man-made channel in which a flow of water occurs, either continuously or intermittently. Sec. 18-152. General Requirements. 9 r (a) All discharges into public requirements of this article;- however, sewers shall conform to the federal categorical pretreatment standards or any standards imposed by the state water control board or its successor in authority are hereby incorporated by reference where applicable and where such standards are more stringent than those set forth in this article. (b) ~~rrta~-gem j '~e~-e~~e No significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approvina authority shall discharae industrial wastewaters into the sanitary sewer system without an appropriate industrial waste discharae permit as provided in this article. (c) Unless exception is granted by the approving authority or by other provisions of this chapter, the public sewer system shall be used by all persons discharging wastewater, industrial waste, polluted liquids or unpolluted waters or liquids. (d) Unless authorized by the State Water Control Board or its successor in authority, no person shall deposit or discharge any waste included in subsection (c) of this section on public or private property in or adjacent to any natural outlet, watercourse, storm sewer or other area within the jurisdiction of the County. (e) The approving authority shall determine, prior to discharge, that wastes to be discharged will receive such treatment as is required by the laws, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders of federal, state and local authorities, or such discharge shall not be permitted. (f) Each industrial user discharging industrial waste waters into 10 ~3 the sanitary sewer system shall provide protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other substances regulated by this Article. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials shall be provided and maintained at the owner or user's own cost and expense. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the approving authority before construction of the facility. All such existing users shall complete such a plan by July 1, 1986. No such user who commences operation after the effective date of this section shall be permitted to introduce pollutants into the system until accidental discharge procedures have been so approved. Review and approval of such plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the industrial user from the responsibility to modify the user's facility as necessary to meet the requirements of this Article. In the case of an accidental discharge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone and notify the approving authority of the incident. The notification shall include location of discharge, type of waste, concentration and volume and corrective actions. Within five (5) days following an accidental discharge; the user shall submit to the approving authority a detailed written report describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage to the sewer system or treatment plant, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil 11 s3 penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by this article or other applicable law. A notice shall be permanently posted on the user's bulletin board or other prominent place advising employees whom to call in the event of a dangerous discharge. Employers shall insure that all employees who may cause or suffer such a dangerous discharge to occur are advised of the emergency notification procedure. (g) In the event of an emergency, as determined by the approving authority, the approving authority shall be authorized to immediately halt any actual or threatened discharge. (h) A person discharging in violation of the provisions of this article, within thirty (30) days of the date of such discharge, shall sample, analyze and submit the data to the approving authority unless the approving authority elects to perform such sampling. Sec. 18-153. Prohibited Discharges Generally. (a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any waste which, by itself or by interaction with other wastes, may: (1) Injure or interfere with wastewater treatment processes or facilities; (2) Constitute a hazard to humans or animals; or (3) Create a hazard in receiving waters of the wastewater treatment plant effluent. Generate heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the plant resulting in interference, and in no case heat in such cruantities that the temperature at the plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Celsius (one hundred 12 .~ four (104) decrees Fahrenheit) unless the approving authority approves alternate temperature limits. (b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain: (1) Antifreeze. (2) Fluoride other than that contained in the public water supply greater than 10.0 mg/l. (3 ) "~ztirr6iLt~P4 ~ Yi e'6rr~crriz~r6i~9 ~i'ca~ce~- czzca::- ~,» .~.y j ~ Benzene, Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX) greater than 5.0 mq/1. ' Flammable or explosive liquid solid or gas in hazardous amounts. (5) Substances causing a chemical oxygen demand (COD) greater than 1,500 mg/1 in the wastewater. (6) Strong acid or concentrated plating solutions, whether neutralized or not. (7) Fats, wax, grease or oils, whether emulsified or not, in excess of 100 mg/1 or containing substances which may solidify or become viscous at temperatures between thirty-two (32°) degrees and one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (0° and 65~ Centigrade). (8) Obnoxious, toxic or poisonous solids, liquids, or gases in quantities sufficient to violate the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. (9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a Ph 13 13 lower than 5.5 or higher than 9.5, or any other substance with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment or personnel at the wastewater facility. (10) Substances which cause a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5. (11) Waste, wastewater or any other substance containing phenols, hydrogen sulfide or other taste-and-odor producing substances that have not been minimized. After treatment of the composite wastewater, effluent concentration limits may not exceed the requirements established by state, federal or other agencies with jurisdiction over discharges to receiving waters. 12 Antimony and beryllium greater than 1.0 ma/1. Sec. 18-154. Technical based local limits. (a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods" are: (1) Arsenic: (2) Barium: (3) Boron: (4) Cadmium: (5) Chromium, Total: f} .25 mg/1 5.0 mg/1 ~~ 1.0 mg/ 1 0.02 mg/1 r9-~~ 2 . 0 mg/ 1 14 ~3 (6) Chromium VI: .011 mg/L. f6} ~_ Copper: 1.0 mg/1 -(~- ,~8 ~ Lead : ~' • 2 mqL {-8} x.91 Manganese: 1.0 mg/1 -{-9-}- 10 Mercury : 0.0 0 5 mg/ 1 {~~} 11 Nickel: 3:-A-~-/~ 2.0 mq/1 {~~ 12 Selenium: 0.02 mg/1 -~} 13 Silver: 0.1 mg/1 {-1-3~}- 14 Z inc : 2 . 0 mg/ 1 {~4} 15 Cvanide: 1.0 mg/1 In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment plant, an adjustment in the given parameter concentration limit will be required. To accomplish this, the industrial discharge permits for industries discharging the particular compound will be adjusted to insure compliance. (c) No other heavy me tals or toxic materials shall be discharged into public sewers withou t a permit from the approving authority specifying conditions of pretreatment, concentrations, volumes and other applicable provisions. (d) Prohibited toxic materials include, but are not limited to: ~- ~~ ~- ~~ 15 Z-~ ~n~ R,,.~ ~, _ {-~6-}- ~ Herbicides . {}~} j21 Fungicides. -Fi-~-~ ~ Pesticides. Sec. 18-155. Discharge of garbage. (a) No person may discharge garbage into public sewers, unless it is shredded to a degree that all particles can be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers. Particles greater than one-half inch in any dimension are prohibited. (b) The approving authority shall have the right to review and approve the installation and operation of any garbage grinder equipped with a motor of three-fourths horsepower (0.76 hp metric) or greater. Sec. 18-156. Discharge of storm water and other unpolluted drainage. (a) No person shall discharge into public sanitary sewers: (1) Unpolluted storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage. {-~}~ Other unpolluted drainage. (b) The approving authority shall designate storm sewers and other watercourses into which unpolluted drainage described in subsection (a) of this section may be discharged. 16 ..~ 3 Sec. 18-157. Temperature of discharges. No person shall discharge liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (65° Centigrade), or any substance which causes the temperature of the total wastewater treatment plant influent to increase at a rate of ten (10) degrees Fahrenheit or more per hour, or a combined total increase of plant influent temperature to one hundred four (104) degrees Fahrenheit. Sec. 18-158. Discharge of radioactive wastes. (a) No person shall discharge radioactive wastes or isotopes into public sewers, without the permission of the approving authority. (b) The approving authority reserves the right to establish, in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations, regulations for discharge of radioactive waste into public sewers. Sec. 18-159 Discharge of substances capable of impairing, etc. facilities. (a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance capable of causing: (1) Obstruction to the flow in sewers; (2) Interference with the operation of treatment processes or facilities; or (3) Excessive loading of treatment facilities. (b) Discharges prohibited by subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, materials which exert or cause concentrations of: (1) ~~ Inert suspended solids greater than 250 mg/1 including, but not limited to Fuller's earth, lime 17 1~ slurries and lime residues. (2) Dissolved solids greater than 500 mg/1 including, but not limited to sodium chlorine and sodium sulfate. (3) Excessive discoloration including, but not limited to dye wastes and vegetable tanning solutions. (4) Wastes having a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5 to 1. Industries having wastewater of this nature shall provide pretreatment as required by the approving authority. (c) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance that may: (1) Deposit grease or oil in the sewer lines in such a manner as to clog the sewers; (2) Overload skimming and grease handling equipment; (3) Pass to the receiving waters without being effectively treated by normal wastewater treatment processes due to the nonamenability of the substance to bacterial action; or (4) Deleteriously affect the treatment process due to excessive quantities. (d) No person shall discharge incompatible waste into public sewers which: (1) Is not amenable to treatment or reduction by the wastewater treatment processes and facilities employed; or (2) Is amenable to treatment only to such a degree that the treatment plant effluent cannot meet the requirements of 18 other agencies having jurisdiction over discharges to the receiving waters. Subsection (b) (3) of this section illustrates the types of substances intended to be regulated by this subsection. (e) The approving authority shall regulate the flow and concentration of slugs when they may: (1) Impair the treatment process; (2) Cause damage to collection facilities; (3) Incur treatment costs exceeding those for normal wastewater; or (4) Render the waste unfit for stream disposal or industrial use. Industrial operations which, on occasion, release sludges of waterborne wastes into the sewers, or which, on occasion, release any significant quantities of materials which adversely influence the effectiveness of treatment in the wastewater treatment plant shall notify the plant in advance of their release, and shall control, at the discretion of the approving authority, the rate of release of these wastes. Permission for such planned releases shall not be unreasonably withheld. Persons failing to comply with these requirements shall be subject to a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per incident, and shall also be liable for the payment of any damages caused, either directly or indirectly, by the unapproved discharge. (f) No person shall discharge into public sewers solid or viscous substances which violate subsection (a)of this section, if present in sufficient quantity or size, including but not limited to: 19 Z-3 (1) Ashes. (2) Cinders. (3) Sand. (4) Mud. (5) Straw. (6) Shavings. (7) Metal. (8) Glass. (9) Rags. (10) Feathers. (11) Tar. (12) Plastics. (13) Wood. (14) Unground garbage. (15) Whole blood. (16) Paunch manure. (17) Hair and fleshings. (18) Entrails. (19) Paper products, either whole or ground by garbage grinders (20) Slops. (21) Chemical residues. (22) Paint residues. (23) Bulk solids. (g) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants which cause interference or pass through. 20 ~: (h) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants with a high flow rate or concentration of conventional pollutants as to interfere with the plant. sec. 18-160. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to reject discharges. (a) If discharges or proposed discharges into public sewers may deleteriously affect wastewater facilities, processes, equipment or receiving waters; create a hazard to life or health; or create a public nuisance; the approving authority shall require: (1) Pretreatment to an acceptable condition before discharge into the public sewers; (2) Control over the quantities and rates of discharge; and (3) Payment to cover the cost of handling and treating the wastes, in addition to capital costs. (b) The approving authority shall reject wastes when he determines that a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection (a) of this section and the discharger does not meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (c) No person shall utilize dilution as a means of treatment. jd) The approving authority shall have the riaht to determine whether a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection (aL of this section. Sec. 18-161. Design, installation and maintenance of pretreatment and control facilities. (a) If pretreatment or control is required, the approving authority may, at his sole discretion, require, review and approve the 21 ~~ design and installation of equipment and processes. The design anc3 installation of such equipment and processes shall conform to all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and other laws, including Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. (b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring pretreatment, flow-equalizing or other facilities shall provide and maintain the facilities in effective operating condition at this own expense. Sec.18-162. Requirements for traps. (a) Discharges requiring a trap include: (1) Grease or waste containing grease in excessive amounts; (2) Oil; (3) Sand; (4) Flammable wastes; and (5) Other harmful substances. (b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring a trap shall, at his own expense and as required by the approving authority: (1) Provide equipment and facilities of a type and capacity approved by the approving authority; (2) Locate the trap in a manner that provides ready and easy accessibility for cleaning and inspection; and (3) Maintain the trap in effective operating condition. Sec. 18-163. Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of discharges. (a) The owner of each facility discharging other than normal wastewater or discharging Class A wastewater shall submit monthly, or at such other frequency as may be required by the approving authority, to the County, on forms supplied by the County, a certified statement of 22 ~"- 3 the quantities of its wastes discharged into the sewers and sewage works of the County or into any sewer connected therewith. Copies of pertinent water bills may be required to be submitted with the above statement. Such documents shall be filed with the County not later than the tenth day of the following month. A separate statement shall be filed for each industrial plant. The total quantities of wastes to be measured and certified by the person so discharging shall be established by the approving authority and shall, as a minimum, include: (1) Liquid in gallons. (2) Five-day BOD in pounds. (3) Suspended solids in pounds, on a dry solids basis. (4) Total phosphorus in pounds. (5) Total Kjeldahl nitrogen in pounds. (6) COD in pounds. (b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement, test, sampling, or analysis required to be made hereunder shall be made in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 136, as amended. (c) In order to provide for accurate sampling and measurement of industrial wastes, each person discharging Class A wastewater shall provide and maintain, on each of its industrial waste outlet sewers, a large manhole or sampling chamber to be located outside or near its plant boundary line, where feasible. If inside the plant fence, there shall be a gate near the sampling chamber with a key furnished to the County. There shall be ample room provided in each sampling chamber tc enable convenient inspection and sampling by the County. (d) Each sampling chamber shall contain a Parshall flume, accurate 23 i' weir or similar device, with a recording and totalizing register for measurement of the liquid quantity; or the metered water supply to the industrial plant may be used as the liquid quantity, where it is substantiated that the metered water supply and waste quantities are approximately the same, or where a measurable adjustment can be made in the metered supply to determine the liquid quantity. (e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly refrigerated and composited in proportion to the flow for a representative twenty-four (24)hours sample. For oil and grease, pH, phenols, cyanide, volatile toxic organic and other appropriate pollutants, property grab sampling shall be performed. Each sampling shall be repeated on as many days as necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire reporting period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in quantities of wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced automatically by the flow-measuring device. (f) Minimum requirements for representative quantities under this section shall include re-evaluation during each twelve (12) month period. The determination of representative quantities shall include not less than seven (7) consecutive days of twenty-four (24) hour composite samplings, taken during periods of normal operation, together with acceptable flow measurements. The frequency of sampling, sampling chamber, metering device, sampling methods and analyses of samples shall be subject, at any time, to inspection and verification by the County. Sampling and measuring facilities shall be such as to provide safe access for authorized personnel of the County for making such inspection: and verification. 24 ~~ (g) Plans for sampling chambers, with their locations shown on a site plan, shall be submitted to the County for approval. (h) All owners of facilities governed by this section shall also comply with any applicable Monitoring Requirements and Regulations established by the approving authority which are hereby incorporated by reference. (i) All owners of facilities governed by this article shall comply with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 as amended, which is incorporated by reference herein, including, without limitation, the signatory, certification and record keeping requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 (c),(d), (i), and (1). All records shall be retained for a minimum of three years and this retention period shall be extended during litigation or upon request of the approving authority. 1.1.L Sampling for discharge limit compliance shall be taken at the sampling chamber without any dilution factor except for proAerly classified categorical or significant users. ~_ Sampling for prohibited materials may be collected at either the sampling chamber or end of process to determine the absence of the prohibited material. Sec. 18-164. Discharge permits for industrial waste. ~ ~ ~Z~t~eica-arr-t-~i39 e~~~ei~~3~6i~~e~--t-~i~~te _..,a__.'~_ j.: ,., ~ . , ~..,.. ; } .. ,,..,, i ; ,-... } ; ,.,., ; ~ t, ; ... •~1~-----#O~l~equ~~r~p-l~e~~ea~t-ale:..., ......__.._-- --- --rr--------- -•------- ---- 25 ~- 3 -~2-T~~eg~t ~~g-p-i~~e at~e~t ; eu~-ids-a--pe~~--a~g3~ea~e~= -gin o~~~~~ed--a-i-g3 88-}-dates a~€~ 4ri~~6 ^~ c1~Ffl=~3~~-~3~~9~s-~T@~ , e-tg'~-~1~~--~y-j-r~e~~e-a~~e;aa-~e~t~i~e-r~rt i~-a~3-~~ des ee~tp~-red-wit-~i-e~eq~~eme~s~e= ---- ---- ----- ~ - r "----- - , , ~. iuvi -F~~~e~rdes ~' i-erg-~ei~t s~~-ee~e-fir ..~.,..~ .,~ ....~.. -{-~}-E-emp~-res-~i t~-~e-~eg~ri~eme~s e~-€e~i~aa _ ~'- ~ ~ ~ = - - ~ , st-a-~a-r~s~re~e-a~p~e~a~~-~i-~e~~i~~-t~~ev~e~e~g~t:~} ~ an; ~ti., , ,. ~.~ ; .., ., (a) It shall be unlawful for any significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approving authority to discharge industrial waste into the public sanitary sewer system unless an appropriate Industrial Discharge Permit has been issued by the approving authority. In order to obtain an Industrial Discharge Permit, such 26 Z3 person shall. ,~ Submit a complete application at least ninety (90) days rior to the date proposed .for initial discharae on forms supplied by the approving authority. The approving authori~ will act upon the application within sixty (60) days. L~ Comply with all requirements for the discharge Qermit including but not limited to, provisions for payment of charges installation and operation of pretreatment facilities and sampling and analysis to determine quantity and strength. ~, Provide a sampling point subject to the provisions of this article and approval of the approving authority. S~ Comply with the requirements of federal categorical standards where applicable, including the development of any required compliance schedules or the applicable provisions of this article. (b) An industrial user applying for a new discharge shall meet all conditions of subsection (a) of this section and shall secure a permit prior to discharging any waste. (c) A person not applying for a discharge permit within the allotted time and continuing to discharge an unpermitted discharge shall be deemed to be in violation of this article. (d) A permit issued under this section shall be valid for up to five (5) years from its date of issuance, after which time the industrial user shall be required to obtain a new discharge permit. 27 '~~~ (e) The approving authority shall have the right to accept or reject any increases in flow or pollutants under existing or new permits. sec. 18-165. Waiver or modification of requirements of article. The approving authority shall have the right to waive or modify, on an interim basis to be noted in any permit issued under this article, the requirements of this article as they pertain to strength of contaminants. No such waiver or modification shall be granted contrary to any County, state or federal regulation and no waiver or modification. shall be granted, if it would result in the violation of the discharge permit for the plant, as it is now issued or as such permit may be amended. Sec. 18-166. Charged generally. Persons making discharges of industrial waste shall pay a charge to cover the cost of collection and treatment in addition to capital costs. When a permit application for industrial waste is approved, the County or its authorized representative shall issue a permit stating: (a) The terms of acceptance by the County; and (b) The basis of payment. Sec. 18-167. User charges and added costs. (a) If the volume or character of the waste to be treated by the plant meets the requirements of other provisions of this article and does not cause overloading of the sewage collection, treatment or disposal facilities of the County, the approving authority shall require that the discharger pay a charge to be determined from the schedule of charges which shall include capital costs. 28 (b) If a proposed discharge of waste is responsible for exceeding the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities and the wastewater treatment plant must be upgraded, expanded or enlarged in order to treat the wastewater, the approving authority shall require that the discharger pay in full all added costs which shall include capital costs the County may incur due to acceptance of the wastewater. (c) The schedule of charges pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall include, but not be limited to: (1) Capital costs, including debt retirement and interest on debt, of the County's cost on all capital outlays for collecting and treating the waste, including new capital outlay and the proportionate part of the value of the existing system used in handling and treating waste. (2) Operation and maintenance costs (capitalized), including but not limited to, salaries and wages, power costs, costs of chemicals and supplies, proper allowances for maintenance, depreciation, overhead and office expense. Sec. 18-168. Schedule of charges. (a) Persons discharging wastewater shall pay a charge to cover the capital cost and the cost of collection and treatment of all wastewater discharged. (1) All Class I users discharging normal wastewater or Group B wastewater shall pay a user charge computed upon cost per volume of wastewater discharged. (2) All Class II users discharging Group A wastewater shall have their user charge computed upon a cost per unit 29 ~- 3 volume basis for the amount plus the unit cost of treatment for all over the base amount for volume, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (SS), phosphorus (P) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). In computing the contaminant loading, the parameter concentrations for normal wastewater will be considered as standard strength in determining the base amount in the effluent discharge flow. Initially, the responsibility for determining the contaminant loading for each category of establishment will be that of the approving authority. However, each establishment must verify its own contaminant loading monthly by initiating a sampling and analytical program at its own expense and with the approval of the approving authority. (b) The units costs to be used to compute the charge for Class I and II users shall be established by the approving authority. The unit costs for all users and the allowances for normal wastewater for users may be revised as necessary to correspond to current costs and experience. Revisions may be made, no more often than once a year, upon approval of the approving authority. The user charge for users shall be computed as follows: Class I Users: Cu = Vu x Vd Class II Users: Cs = Vu x Vd + VSVc + BSBc + SSSc + PSPc + NSNc And: Cu Charge for Class I users 30 ~3 Cs = Charge for Class II users Vu = Unit cost of treatment chargeable to normal wastewater ($/1,000 gal.) Vd = Volume of wastewater from normal wastewater (1,000 gals.) Vs = Volume of Class II wastewater (1,000 gals.) in excess of Class I wastewater V = Cost of treating 1,000 gals. of Class II wastewater ($/1,000 gal.) c -~ ~ ~ i~ i~-- - ~b~s B e~a ~ = Class { ~ II wastewater BOD contribution in excess of Class I -s wastewater limit (lbs.) B = Cost of treating Class II BOD contribution ($/lb.) c S = Class II wastewater SS contribution in excess of Class I wastewater s limit (lbs.) S = Cost of treating Class II SS contribution ($/lb.) c ~= C-est e~t~ea~g-E-l-ass-i~-glre sp~re~ts ~eb~e~--~~1~-3- Ps = Class II wastewater phosphorus contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.~ Ns = Class II wastewater unoxidized nitrogen contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.) Nc = Cost of treating Class II nitrogen contribution ($/lb.) Sec. 18-169. Adjustment of charges. (a) The county may adjust charges at least annually to reflect changes in the characteristics of wastewater based on the results of sampling and testing. This adjustment will correspond to charges established by the operating authority for the treatment plant. 31 ~` (b) The county shall review at least annually the basis for determining charges and shall adjust the unit treatment cost in the formula to reflect increases or decreases in wastewater treatment costs based on the previous year's experience. Sec. 18-170. Billing and payment of charges. (a) The county may bill the discharger by the month or by the quarter and shall show waste charges as a separate item on the regular bill for water and sewer charges. The discharger shall pay in accordance with practices existing for payment of sewer charges. (b) In addition to sanctions provided for by this article, the County is entitled to exercise sanctions provided for by the other ordinances of the County for failure to pay the bill for water and sanitary sewer service when due. Sec. 18-171. Right of entry to enforce article. (a) The approving authority and other duly authorized employees of the County bearing proper credentials and identification shall be authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of enforcing this article for sampling purposes, inspect monitoring equipment and to inspect and copy all documents relevant to the enforcement of this article, including, without limitation, monitoring reports. Anyone acting under this authority shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection. ~e~s~ e~da~age-fie ids-p-r~e- e~~e~ees~~-a~g~i~rsrt_ _~'~ _' _},• 32 13 ~..~ ~ ..l uZ""i.ZT. =eT Appropriate information submitted to the approving authority pursuant to these regulations excluding any information utilized in determining effluent limits may be claimed as confidential by the submitter at the time of submission by stampinct the words "confidential business information" on each page containing such information. If a claim is asserted the information shall be treated in accordance with applicable law. (c) No person acting under authority of this section may inquire into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining, ceramic, paper or other industries, beyond that point having a direct bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the public sewers. dQ-te-~i-~-i~rg-e~€~~~~.--aim' e-e-l-a-iced-a~s ~e~de~~-bye Sec. 18-172. Authority to disconnect service. (a) The county reserves the right to terminate water and wastewater disposal services and disconnect a customer from the system and revoke any discharge permit issued under this article when: (1) Acids or chemicals damaging to sewer lines or treatment 33 ~` process are released into the sewer causing rapid deterioration of these structures or interfering with proper conveyance and treatment of wastewater; (2) A governmental agency informs the County that the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is no longer a quality permitted for discharge into a watercourse, and it is found that the customer is delivering wastewater to the County's system that cannot be sufficiently treated or requires treatment that is not provided by the County as normal domestic treatment; or (3) The customer: a. Discharges industrial waste or wastewater that is in violation of the permit issued by the approving authority; b. Discharges wastewater at an uncontrolled, variable rate in sufficient quantity to cause an imbalance in the wastewater treatment system; c. Fails to pay bills for water and sanitary sewer services when due; or d. Repeats a discharge of prohibited wastes into public sewers. (4) The permittee has engaged in fraudulent reporting to the approval authority or failed to report adequately as required changes in discharge. (b) If the service is disconnected pursuant to subsection (a) (2) of this section, the County shall: 34 7- 3 (1) Disconnect the customer; (2) Supply the customer with the governmental agency's report and provide the customer with all pertinent information; and (3) Continue disconnection until such time as the customer provides additional pretreatment or other facilities designed to remove the objectionable characteristics from this wastes. Sec. 18-173. Notice of violations The county shall serve persons discharging in violation of this article with written notice stating the nature of the violation and requiring immediate satisfactory compliance. The approving authority shall have the authority to publish annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the Roanoke area a list of persons which were not in compliance with the terms of this Article at least once during the twelve (12) previous months. Sec. 18-174. Penalty for violations. (a) A person who violates the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation per day and confinement in jail for not more than twelve months, either or both. In the event of a violation, the approving authority shall also have the right to terminate the sewer and water connection. (b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-section (a) of this section, the County is entitled to pursue all other criminal and 35 1 '~ civil remedies to which it is entitled under authority of state statues or other ordinances of the County against a person continuing prohibited discharges, including, without limitation, injunctive relief. ~_ Any person who knowingly makes any false statements, representations or certifications in any application, record, report, plan or other document files required to be maintained pursuant to this ordinance, or wastewater permit, or who falsifies, tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required under this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be punishable by a fine of 51,000.00 per violation, per dav, or imprisonment for not more than one ear, or both. ~_ The approving authority shall be authorized to implement such other program and enforcement mechanisms as are consistent with regulatory guidelines and are deemed appropriate. Sec. 18-175. Payment of costs for work required by prohibited deposits. In any case where a sewer main or pipe connection is stopped, damaged or choked by any materials or rubbish being deposited therein contrary to the provisions of this article, by any tenant or property owner, upon due ascertainment by the County Administrator, he shall cause the main pipe connection or manhole to be opened, cleaned, replaced or repaired, and shall cause the cost for doing such work to be collected from the property owner. The payment of such cost shall not relieve any person from prosecution for a violation of this article. S@C. 18-176. Pub11C aCC@33 tO data. Effluent data complied as part of the approving authority's pretreatment program shall be available to the public. 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after December 1, 1991. c:\wp5]\agenda\code\sewet2 36 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Court-Community Corrections Policy Board Three-year term of Harry C. Nickens will expire December 31, 1991. Supervisor Nickens has indicated his willingness to serve another term on this Board. 2. Grievance Panel Three-year term of alternate Cecil Hill expired October 12, 1991. Mr. Hill has been appointed as a regular member of the panel. 3. Librarv Board Four-year terms of Jane Bryant, Catawba Magisterial District and Dr. Paul M. Zeis, Windsor Hills Magisterial District will expire December 31, 1991. 4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors Three-year term of Rita J. Gliniecki will expire December 31, 1991. Ms. Gliniecki is eligible for reappointment. Please see attached letter. 5. Planning Commission Four-year term of Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring Magisterial District will expire December 31, 1991. 6. Social Services Board Four-year term of William P. Broderick will expire January 1, 1992. Mr. Broderick has served two terms and is not eligible for reappointment. ~~ SUBMITTED BY: APPR VED BY• ~ ~ .~ ~~. Mary H. lien Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs ', ~' i-. ~, ` i~ , ~~ ~ - ~. ,,, Chairman John M. Hudgins, Jr. Vice Chairman Henry J. Sullivan, Ph.D Treasurer Daniel E. Karnes Secretary Rita J. Gliniecki E,tecutiue Director Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. November 7, 1991 Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 298P1P1 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. McGraw: ~°~ According to our records, Mrs. Rita J. Gliniecki's term of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors expires December 31, 1991. Our records also indicate that Mrs. Gliniecki is eligible for consideration for appointment to another three-year term in com- pliance with Virginia Statutes regulating appointments to our Board. Your attention to this matter will be very much appreciated. S' cerely, Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. Executive Director FPRjr:cd C: Elmer C. Mary H. John M. Rita J. Hodge Allen Hudgins, Jr. Gliniecki MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOICE VALLEY -Executive Offices 301 Elm Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24015-4026 - (703) 345-9841 FAX (703) 342-3855 Serving the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke ~~ ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 19, 1991, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991 2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department Board of Directors. 3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in connection with the Roanoke River~Interceptor Phase III Project. 5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 111991-14 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 19, 1991, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991 2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department Board of Directors. 3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III Project. 5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: :x AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Health Department Board of Directors File ~-, October 8, 1991 ;~- ~. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 8, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1991. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:14 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PREBENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT: None 8TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator, Anne Marie Green, Information Officer IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Kenneth Stofft, Our Lady of Nazareth Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by October 8, 1991 ~ l/ •J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to NEDRA W. CROCRETT for fourteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None b. Iris S. Groft R-10891-1.b Ms. Groff was present and also received a savings bond and plaque recognizing over 25 years of service. Supervisor Robers moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLIITION 10891-1.b E%PRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY TO IRIS 8. GROFF FOR TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COIINTY WHEREAS, Iris S. Groff was first employed in July, 1966, as a Social Worker in the Department of Social Services; and c October 8, 1991 following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLIITION 10891-i.c E%PRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY TO RONALD R. HENDERBON, SR. FOR THIRTY-TWO YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COIINTY WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr. was first employed in May, 1959 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr. has also served as Lieutenant and Captain in the Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr., through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to RONALD R. HENDERSON, SR. for thirty-two years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: October 8, 1991 "" .~ .. 3 life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROGER D. HIIFFMAN for twenty three years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None 2. Resolution of Aooreciation to Magnetic Bearings, Incorporated for locating in Roanoke County. R-10891-2 Representatives from Magnetic Bearings were present to receive the resolution. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLIITION 10891-2 OF APPRECIATION TO MAGNETIC BEARINGS, INC. (MBI) FOR LOCATING IN ROANORE COIINTY WHEREAS, MBI conducted a search to relocate its 37 employees and expand its facilities in the Roanoke Valley from Radford; and ,, October 8, 1991 A-10891-3 There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Public-Private Partnership request. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 2. Discussion of proposed 1991-92 Legislative Program County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that items on the proposed legislative program requests came from individual Board members, other localities and the Employee Advisory Committee. He reported that the VACo/VML joint annexation task force is still studying this legislative request, and that the County Attorney's office will monitor this and the reallocation of state funding of education for equity. There was discussion on some requests as to whether these should be addressed through a charter amendment or general legislation. Mr. Mahoney advised that a public hearing must be held for charter amendments and that a patron must sponsor general legislation in the General Assembly. Chairman McGraw asked Mr. Mahoney to bring back a prioritized list of legislative requests to the October 22, 1991 meeting. 3. Reconsideration of 301 Gilmer Associates Rezonin Re uest. At the request of the attorney for the petitioner, Supervisor Johnson moved to reconsider the issue. He asked staff October 8, 1991 i ordinance. They were not necessarily opposed to the ordinance but requested involvement in preparation. 1. Seth P. Oginz, Security Consultants Unlimited, 4333 Old Cave Spring Road. 2. Hugh Preston, Affiliated Electronics Corporation, 2112 Shenandoah Avenue. 3. Doug Mathena, Alarmtronics Company, 542 Parkdale Drive, Salem. 4. D. Martin Etzler, Jr., 4040 Franklin Road 5. Connie Higginbotham, Route 4, Box 1450, Rocky Mount, Va. Supervisor Robers moved that the item be deferred to allow for input from the alarm industry. Mr. Hodge asked that the Board approve the first reading of the ordinance and that the staff will meet with the alarm industry and bring back more information for the second reading. Supervisor Robers amended his motion to approve first reading and that staff meet with the industry and set a work session if necessary prior to the second reading of the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens asked that the second reading include verification of which firms had been contacted for input. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance acce tin an offer for and authorizin E October 8, 1991 ~' °~ 1-17; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of Dennis L. Humston to purchase this property of Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,000.00) is hereby accepted; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Nickens nominated Wayne Dunman to a four year term expiring September 26, 1995 upon recommendation of the Vinton Town Council. 2. Planninc Commission Supervisor Johnson nominated Ronald Massey to another four- year term that will expire December 31, 1995. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA October 8, 1991 f n ~ i with Item 4 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST FROM SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD FOR SUPPORT IN OPPOSITION TO AMENDMENTS TO THE CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT LAW Several Board members asked for more information on this issue which would exclude local school personnel from being investigated by Social Services agencies for allegations of child abuse and neglect. Supervisor Eddy moved to defer this item to gather further information including input from the Schools and staff. There was no vote. Supervisor Robers offered a substitute motion to bring back the issue on October 22, 1991 with additional input from the school administration and staff. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIEB OF BOARD MEMBERS 8unervisor Eddv: (1) Announced he had attended Congressman Jim Olin's seminar on affordable housing. He requested a report from the Planning staff on Roanoke County's effort to provide affordable housing. The Board members suggested that Supervisor Eddy meet with the Planning Director instead. (2) Asked for more information on the Spring Hollow bid timeframe. Mr. Hodge t V October 8, 1991 IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Joint Work Session with Appalachian Power Officials - APCO Transmission Line Mr. Hodge introduced officials from Appalachian Power Company. They included Charles A. Simmons, Vice President, Construction and Maintenance and Dr. Leonard J. Simutis, Study Team consultant. Mr. Simmons provided an overview of the APCO and American Electric Power study which was undertaken by a study team from West Virginia University and VPI&SU who recommended a preferred corridor and an alternate corridor for the 765 kv line. The proposed line will cross Roanoke County in the Catawba area. He advised that SCC will hold public hearings on April 2, 1992 in New Castle, Virginia and on April 6, 1992 in Richmond regarding the preferred and alternate corridors. Dr. Simutis reported that the study team studied 26 different routes and the team paid particular attention to residences and the potential scenic impact to the Jefferson National Forest and the Appalachian Trail. They were also mandated to parallel existing transmission lines whenever possible. He advised there were only 17 homes in Virginia within 500 feet of the preferred corridor. Mr. Hodge advised that the staff would continue to work with the citizens in the affected area, with Appalachian Power officials, and will keep the board informed. Supervisor McGraw asked that the Board of Supervisors be provided with a list of residences that would be impacted by the transmission line. October 8, 1991 ~ ~ WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Eddy IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT October 17, 1991 .~ n ~„ ~. ,+ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 17, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being an adjourned meeting from Tuesday, October 8, 1991 for the purpose of accepting bids for the General Obligation and Water Revenue Bonds for the Spring Hollow Reservoir. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:11 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator, Anne Marie Green, Information Officer IN RE: INVOCATION October 17, 1991 .7 r ~_ ,; 1. Acceptance of Sale of S15 million General Obligation Bonds. R-101791-1 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared resolution accepting the sale of $15 million General Obligation Bonds. Supervisor Eddy presented the following comments that he requested be included in the minutes. "Mr. Chairman, I am pleased that the bond interest rates appear to be so attractive. I am also pleased that the combined amount of the bond issue has been moderately reduced from that previously estimated as a result of the low interest rates and the favorable construction bids received on the reservoir portion of the project. I think most of the teams involved in developing the financing package have performed very well, and are to be commended. However, I plan to vote against the resolutions ratifying the terms of the bond sales for the following reasons: 1. I have previously opposed the Spring Hollow Project and the bond issues, and I intend to act in a consistent manner. 2. The Spring Hollow Project has a very high cost-to- benefit ratio. 3. In my opinion, alternate sources and arrangements have not been evaluated to a sufficient degree to demonstrate, without question, that the Spring Hollow Project financed entirely by Roanoke County is the best solution to the Roanoke Valley's water needs in the foreseeable future. 4. The County is approaching the overall project on a October 17, 1991 `~ +.` f Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1991 ("Bond Purchase Agreement") with Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated, Craigie Incorporated, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Scott & Stringfellow Investment Corp. ("Underwriters"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Ratification of Terms. The issuance and sale of theBonds upon the terms and conditions set forth in the BondPurchase Agreement are approved and ratified. 2. Ratification of Preliminary Official Statement; Execution of Official Statement. The Preliminary Official Statement is deemed final as of its date except for the omissionof certain Information such as offering prices, interest rates, selling compensation and other information permitted by Rule 15c- 2-12 (b) of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Chairman of the Board is authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Official Statement with respect to the issuance and sale of the Bonds in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement with such changes that are not inconsistent with Rule 15c-2-12 as such officer may consider necessary or desirable in connection therewith and such Official Statement is hereby approved. 3. ADUrOVal and Execution of Bond Purchase Agreement The Bond Purchase Agreement is approved in substantially the form submitted at this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omissions as may be approved by the Chairman of the Board or the October 17, 1991 ~ v ~j R-101791-2 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution accepting the sale of $59,731,874 Water Revenue Bonds. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: Supervisor Eddy REBOLIITION 10791-2 OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA WITH RESPECT TO WATER SYSTEM REVENIIE BONDB, SERIES 1991 The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a Resolution on August 27, 1991 ("Resolution"), authorizing the issuance and sale of the County's Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 1991 ("Bonds"). The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the following documents: (i) Master Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1991, between the County and Crestar Bank, as Trustee ("Trustee"); (ii) First Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1991, between the County and the Trustee; (iii) Preliminary official Statement with respect to the sale of the Bonds, dated October 4, 1991; and (iv) Bond Purchase Agreement, dated October 17, 1991 ("Bond Purchase Agreement") among the County and Alex. Brown & Sons, Incorporated, Craigie Incorporated, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Scott & Stringfellow Investment Corp., as Underwriters ("Underwriters"). All of the documents listed above, except the Preliminary Official Statement, are referred to in this Resolution as the October 17, 1991 Documents. The execution and delivery of and performance by the County of the Basic Documents are authorized. 4. Ratification of Escrow Agreement The County has defeased the outstanding principal amount of its $960,000 Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("VRA Bond") pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1991 ("Escrow Agreement") among the County, Crestar Bank, as Escrow Agent and the Virginia Resources Authority. The execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement and all actions in connection with the defeasance of the VRA Bond taken or required to be taken by the County Administrator, and such officers and agents of the County as he may designate, are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed. 5. Further Actions. The County Administrator, and such officers and agents of the County as he may designate, are authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by the Bonds, the Escrow Agreement and the Basic Documents; and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed by such officers or agents of the County, are in all respects approved, ratified and confirmed. 6. Filing of Resolution The County Attorney is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia pursuant to Sections 15.1-227.9 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. October 17, 1991 1~,~ Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN REt ADJOIIRNMENT At 5:04 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Steven A. McGraw, Chairman .~ ' {.< <J October 22, 1991 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 22, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1991. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:11 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson (arrived at 3:35 p.m.), Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT: None 8TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator, Anne Marie Green, Information Officer IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES October 22, 1991 ~ +~ local subcontractors. IN RE: NEW BIISINE88 1. Rewest for authorization to award construction contract for spring Hollow Reservoir. A-102291-1 Supervisors Johnson, Robers and McGraw spoke in strong support for the reservoir project. Supervisor Eddy announced he would vote in opposition. Supervisor Nickens moved to award the contract to PCL from Tempe, Arizona. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None Following the award, Chairman McGraw and Mr. Lord participated in a signing ceremony. 2. Revuest from Social Services Department to accept and a~Dro~riate Childcare and Development Block Grant. A-102291-2 Social Services Director Betty Lucas reported that this grant would increase the availability, affordability and quality of child care for low-income families who are not on welfare assistance and enable them to continue working or attending education and training programs. The grant is $41,270.00 and is 100 percent reimbursable, but requires "up front" monies. October 22, 1991 following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, McGraw 4. Aooroval of 1991-92 Legislative Program R-102291-4 Mr. Mahoney reported that at the October 8 meeting the Board discussed the proposed legislative program and directed that he bring back the program for approval with any additional comments from the Board members. Supervisor Nickens suggested that the request regarding funds for law enforcement expenditures (Item 2.a) should be included as a charter amendment. Supervisor Johnson suggested including it in both general legislation and charter amendments. Supervisor Eddy asked for support for his requests that included limiting courts in rezoning decisions and a local tax on bingo profits. Mr. Mahoney responded that there was no legislator willing to sponsor the rezoning legislation. Following other discussion, there was no consensus to add Supervisor's Eddy's requests to the program. Supervisors Nickens and Johnson questioned the enforceability of the request that would allow the County to regulate the sounds of train bells and suggested that this issue be discussed with the railroad (Item 3.b). Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the legislative program with Item 3.B removed and Item 2.A included in both general legislative requests and charter amendment legislation. The motion October 22, 1991 A + , a. Amend § 2.02 to increase the authority of the County to levy and collect taxes on hotel and motel rooms from 2$ to 4$. b. Amend § 2.02 to authorize the County to impose a tax upon the sale or use of cigarettes or other tobacco products. c. Amend § 12.04 to authorize the Roanoke County School Board to set the school calendar and establish an earlier date for the opening of the school year and relieve the County from the post-Labor Day opening day requirement. d. Amend Chapter 5, Administrative Departments, by the addition of § 5.02 to provide for law enforcement funding by establishing a distribution of funds for law enforcement expenditures in an amount not less than the amount of expenditures to the county by the State Compensation Board for law enforcement purposes. 2. That the general laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia be amended as follows: a. Amend Article 10 of Title 14.1 to establish a distribution of funds for law enforcement expenditures for counties establishing a police force pursuant to referendum in an amount not less than the amount of expenditures to that county by the State Compensation Board for law enforcement purposes. b. Amend general law to provide for a beverage container deposit. c. Repeal the Dillon Rule. d. Amend § 59.1-274 to increase the number of enterprise zones. The General Assembly is requested to authorize October 22, 1991 i4 h recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None 5. Reovest from School Board for acceptance of grants totalinc 5180,000 for vocational education programs. A-102291-5 Garland Kidd, Director of Vocational and Adult Education was present to answer questions. Supervisor Johnson moved to accept the grants. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None 6. ReQUest for 5350,000 allocation from year end surplus for meritorious bonuses for all county employees Supervisor Johnson asked that a portion of the year-end surplus be allocated to fund a bonus for all county and school employees in recognition of their contributions since the County did not fund salary increases this year. Budget Director Reta Busher advised that a $100 bonus for 2500 employees would cost $375,000. Mr. Hodge responded that he would prefer that the year- end surplus be set aside in a special account to fund salaries in the 1992-93 budget. Supervisor McGraw asked that the staff bring back a list of alternatives including employee bonuses, future salary increases October 22, 1991 F Planning Commission. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES i. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to the Valley Soccer Club. Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Carpenter presented the staff report advising that the Soccer Club will be responsible for maintaining the property and that improvements will revert back to the County upon termination of the 10 year renewable lease. He reported that the County will be able to use the fields at no charge when not in conflict with Valley Soccer Club activities. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy, Mr. Mahoney advised the lease will be available for review at the second reading on November 19. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amendinct the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Article VIII "Fire and Securit Alarms" to Chapter 16 "Police" to regulate the use and aeration of security and fire alarm systems (CONTINIIED TO NOVEMBER 19, 1991) October 22, 1991 M .: each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - September 10, 1991, September 24, 1991. 2 Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Court-Community Corrections Policy Board, the Industrial Development Authority and the Planning Commission. 3. Request for acceptance of Strathmore Lane and Cardington Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Bentley Park Subdivision. 5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Hollins Court. 6. Approval of Raffle Permit for Cave Spring District Lions Club. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. on motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve with Item 5 removed for separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve Item No. 5, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None October 22, 1991 ,, r ~l ~ ~ Cardington Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS supervisor Eddv• (1) Asked who will be attending the Virginia Association of Counties annual conference. He was informed that Chairman McGraw will be attending at VACo's expense because he is president of the organization. Others attending include Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Hodge, Mr. Mahoney and Public Information Officer Anne Marie Green. (2) Asked about a report on enforcement of the weed ordinance. Mr. Hodge responded that he will bring back a report on December 17. Supervisor Nickens: (1) Asked for report regarding Roanoke County's contributions encouraging tourism in the Roanoke Valley. Supervisor Johnson• (1) Asked when the audit report would be ready. Mr. Hodge responded that he will have the report for the November 19, 1991 meeting and will also schedule an Audit October 22, 1991 75~ Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) for legal consultation regarding the landfill contract and the Fralin & Waldron court case (Too-Tall Building), and (1) to discuss a personnel matter regarding appointments to the Library Board. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECUTIVE SESSION R-102291-7 At 5:55 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to Open Session and adopt the certification resolution. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLUTION 102291=7 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of October 22, 1991 IN RE: PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declarinc the week of November 3 through 9, 1991 as Royal Ambassador Week. Dave Simmons with the Royal Ambassadors was present to receive the proclamation and introduced the youths who were involved in the program. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the proclamation. The motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote with Supervisor Nickens absent. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 1091-1 Recuest for a Special Exception Permit from valley Soccer Club. Inc. to construct recreational soccer fields on a 14.51 acre tract located at 6661 Merriman Road Cave Spring Macisterial District. A-102291-8 Planning and Zoning Director Terry Harrington presented the staff report. He advised that the property is owned by the County and was the location of the Starkey Road sewer lagoon. It is currently zoned M-1 Light Industrial and recreational uses are permitted with a Special Exception Permit. He reported that the property is in a floodplain and FEMA requirements will have to be met, and that the petitioner has received approval for a variance for the paving requirements. Rachel Wilkerson, who lives on Merriman Road, was concerned about whether the fields will be lighted in the future. y ~ n ,'~ .~ October 22, 1991 i Caretaker mobile homes are not permitted in any zoning district and the application is for uses not provided in the zoning ordinance. Supervisor McGraw moved to grant the Use Not Provided for Permit. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw. NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 102291-9 AIITHORIZING A IISE-NOT- PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ALLOW A CARETAKER'S MOBILE HOME IN THE CAMPGROIIND LOCATED AT 5753 WEST MAIN STREET, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT IIPON THE APPLICATION OF DIBIE CAVERNS ~ POTTERY INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 22, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit allowing a caretaker's mobile home in the campground (a portion of Tax Map Number 63.04-1-1) located at 5753 West Main Street in the Catawba Magisterial District is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dixie caverns ~ Pottery Inc. October 22, 1991 ~ 1 r ~ Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 0-102291-10 Mr. Harrington explained that Mr. Hubbard plans to operate a 24-hour taxi-cab business from the site. The area is in a Transition Land Use category, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request 4 - 1. Supervisor Eddy asked if there was any limit to the number of taxis that Mr. Hubbard can operate, and Mr. Harrington responded there is nothing in the conditions that would limit the number. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the request. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson McGraw. NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 102291-10 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 0.685-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4909 COVE ROAD (TAB MAP NO. 37.17-1-5) IN THE CATAWHA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1, LIGHT INDIISTRIAL DISTRICT, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M- 1, LIGHT INDIISTRIAL DISTRICT/CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) AND AIITHORIZING A IISE- NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE A TABI SERVICE IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THOMAS R. HIIBBARD JR. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 24, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 22, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a October 22, 1991 (a) No outside storage of materials. (b) Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. (c) Plant new shrubs in front of the building. (d) The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, administrative and other purposes reasonably related to the activities above- described. Also this Droperty will be used to operate a taxi cab service. (e) The total area of all business signs on the property will not at any one time exceed the sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot of street frontage and in no event more than 300 square feet, regardless of the number of lineal feet of street frontage. L,L The storage of motor fuels in bulk, either above or below around, shall be prohibited. All other proffers and conditions would remain in full force. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron stake on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Peters Creek Road, Virginia Highway Route 117, 146.29 feet northeasterly from an angle point at the northwesterly corner of Peters Creek Road and Cove Road, said beginning point being the northeasterly corner of the property of Humble Oil Co.; thence leaving Peters Creek Road and with two lines of the Humble Oil Co. property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 100.0 feet to an iron stake; thence S. 34 deg. 28' 30" W. 165.00 feet to an iron stake on the northerly right-of-way line of Cove Road (Virginia Highway No. 116); thence with same, leaving the Humble Oil Co. property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 113.00 feet to an iron stake, a corner to the property of Mrs. Dorothy H. Whitesell, Mrs. Geraldine H. Waring and Frances H. Easley; thence with same and leaving Cove Road, N. 35 deg. 12' 10" October 22, 1991 t~ petitioner. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Harrington explained that the stormwater management standards were proffered so that the petitioner could not request a waiver of the standards from the staff at a future time. The original request was for a building that would have a height of up to 100 feet to facilitate visibility from the interstate. The Planning Commission and the applicant decided to proffer the height of the building to be no higher than 55 ft above the finished grade. Supervisor Eddy asked for a determination of what finished grade meant. Mr. Harrington responded that meant the property as it is now. The City of Roanoke has a main water transmission line through the property and will not allow fill dirt on the line. At this time it is undetermined whether the City will move the transmission line in the future. Following discussion of whether the petitioner could use fill dirt in the future to raise the grade of the property, Mr. Johnson asked how high the building was going to be in reference to the street. Mr. Harrington advised that they did not know at this point. Anne Grove, attorney for the petitioner, explained that the property falls approximately 25 to 30 feet off Plantation Road and they considered the finished grade to mean road level and that the building would rise only about 25 feet above Planation Road. They have no intention of using fill dirt to create a taller building. She further explained they were working with the City of Roanoke regarding movement of the transmission line or easement. Carol Slate, 7538 Friendship Lane, expressed concern October 22, 1991 ~~ 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.15 acres, as described herein, and located at the intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane, (Tax Map Number 18.18-2-5) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-3, Special Commercial District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Relau Inc. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The rezoning request from B-3 to B-2 commercial is for the purpose of constructing a small two- story hotel/motel (approximately 50-80 rooms) designed and franchised by the Hampton Inn Corporation or some other similar hotel/motel chain. b) Applicant agrees to construct this building in accordance with the BOCA National Building Code (1990) requirements for the installation of a sprinkler system on the second floor as requested by the Roanoke County Building Inspections Department. c) Applicant agrees to construct this building no higher than 55 feet above average finished i October 22, 1991 east side of Merriman Road, 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road, Cave Sprinq Magisterial District, upon the petition of Joe Bandy and son, Inc. 0-102291-12 Mr. Harrington reported that the landfill will be used to dispose of tree stumps, concrete and asphalt. Approximately 25 acres will be an active landfill area. The conditions from a Special Use Permit issued in 1988 are being complied to by Mr. Bandy. Mr. Bandy has not yet received a permit from the Department of Waste Management. The petitioner has agreed to six proffered conditions and the Planning Commission recommended approval. In response to questions from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Harrington advised that the County does not currently inspect landfills such as these. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner advised that the state permit regulates the construction, operation, closing and post-closing of the landfill. He estimated there will be 25 to 30 trucks going to the landfill a day. Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about the dust from the truck trips, and Mr. Natt responded that Mr. Bandy would be willing to improve the access road to eliminate the dust. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern that the state would not monitor the landfill in regard to complying with the regulations. He asked the staff to work with the petition to ensure that appropriate inspections takes place. Mr. Natt responded that Mr. Bandy would be willing to proffer any county- .. _' I October 22, 1991 exception permit for the location and operation of a stump and construction debris landfill is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Joe Bandy & Son Inc. to operate a stump and construction debris landfill on a 74.86 acre tract of land located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613) 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a. Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 25 acres. b. A minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. c. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. d. Building construction or demolition debris, such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not be permitted to be landfilled on this site. e. This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. f. The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. g. The 400-foot access road will be paved. October 22, 1991 ,r Supervisor Robers moved to approve the request. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None ORDINANCE 102291-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.20 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IIS 220, RED HILL AREA, ( TA% MAP NO . 9 8.0 4 -2 -2 0 ) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, OFFICE DISTRICT, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE APPLICATION OF MA%EY HOMES INCORPORATED WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 22, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.20 acre, as described herein, and located on the west side of US Route 220, Red Hill area, (Tax Map Number 98.04-2-20) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. October 22, 1991 '' '~ s .' % ct 1091-7 An ordinance to rezone 4.647 acres from R-3 to B-2 for general commercial uses, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road at its intersection with Barrens Road Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Friendshiu Manor Apartment Village Coro. A-102291-14 Mr. Harrington advised that this request will allow the site to be developed for commercial uses. There is no proffered site plan nor have any uses been proposed. VDOT will require a commercial entrance permit and the staff will require a site plan review for any of the potential uses. Supervisor Nickens asked about fire protection or sprinklers and adequate water pressure. Mr. Harrington advised that the BOCA Code requires sprinklers for certain uses, and that there is not even sufficient flow for the current zoning of the property. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy regarding a site plan, Mr. Harrington responded that the applicant did not wish to proffer a site plan. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about the inadequate water pressure that could create criticism of the County in the future for allowing this use. Mr. Johnson felt that the petitioner will have to meet the code with the limited water pressure. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the request. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: October 22, 1991 I / FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORP. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. To maximize safety of ingress and egress to property along Barrens Road, the commercial entrance to the parcel bordering Barrens and Peters Creek Road shall be aligned with the proposed bus exit near the front of Burlington School. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin found on the eastern right- of-way of Southern Drive, 50' wide; said pin being 202.24 feet from the intersection of the southern right-of-way of Peters Creek Road (Virginia State Route 117) and the eastern right-of-way of Southern Drive; thence with a line parallel to Peters Creek Road N. 71 deg. 59' 11' E. 410.63 feet to a point on the western right-of-way a 50' private mutual cross access easement (see Plat Book 13, page 138, Roanoke County Circuit Court); thence with the western right-of-way of said easement S. 14 deg. 32' 29" E. 68.41 feet to a point of curvature; thence continuing with said right-of-way with a curve whose radius is 405.57 feet, a delta of 12 deg. 00' 00", an arc of 84.94 feet, a chord bearing of S. 20 deg. 32' 29" E. and a chord distance of 84.79 feet to a point of tangency; thence S. 26 deg. 32' 29" E. 296.16 feet to a point of curvature; thence with a curve whose radius is 255.00 feet, a delta of 9 deg. 51' 15", an arc of 43.86 feet, a chord bearing of S. 31 deg. 28' 06" E. and a chord distance of 43.80 feet to a point; thence leaving the western right- of-way of said easement S. 63 deg. 55' S0" W. 391.30 feet to a point on the eastern right-of-way of Southern Drive; thence with the eastern right-of- way of Southern Drive N. 26 deg. 04' 10" W. 548.72 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING and containing 4.647 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances October 23, 1991 ~' i 3 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Roanoke,. Virginia 24018 October 23, 1991 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Vinton War Memorial, Vinton, Virginia, this being an adjourned meeting from October 22, 1991 and a joint meeting with the Roanoke City Council, Vinton Town Council, Roanoke County Resource Authority and the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson (arrived at 3:45 p.m.), Richard W. Robers MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the Roanoke City Council, Members of the Vinton Town Council, Members of the Roanoke Regional Solid Waste Management Board, Members of the Roanoke County Resource Authority, Officials of Norfolk Southern Railroad Corporation e October 23, 1991 'J the Roanoke County Resource Authority by motion of Mr. Johnson. RESOLIITION 102391-1 APPROVING AND AIITHORIZING THE EBECIITION OF CERTAIN AGREEMENTS FOR THE DERELOPMENT AND IISE OF REGIONAL SOLID WASTE FACILITIES AND FOR THE DISPOSAL OF ACCEPTABLE SOLID WASTE WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the Roanoke County Resource Authority hereby intend to approve and execute certain documents and agreements for the development and use of regional solid waste facilities and for the disposal of acceptable solid waste; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board intends to join in the approval and execution of certain of these documents and agreements in order to assign and distribute certain assets and property to the successful completion of the development of a regional solid waste facility; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of all the parties and of their citizens to undertake the actions contemplated herein for a regional solution to the problems associated with the disposal of solid waste. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the terms, conditions, and provisions set forth in the "Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement," "Assignment Agreement," and "Distribution and Indemnification Agreement" are hereby approved and ratified. This approval and ratification of these agreements shall be evidenced by the execu- tion thereof by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke October 23, 1991 L NAYS: None 2. Resolution an~ointina the initial members of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. R-102391-2 Supervisor Nickens moved to appoint the County's initial members of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw. NAYS: None RESOLUTION 102391-2 APPOINTING INITIAL MEMBERS TO THE ROANORE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") has determined that it is in the best interests of the Authority to authorize the City of Roanoke ("City") and the Town of Vinton ("Town") to become members of the existing Roanoke County Resource Authority, pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, ("Act"); and, WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed the proposed "Articles of Amendment of the Roanoke County Resource Authority;" and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint the initial Roanoke County members to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the names, addresses, and terms of office of the initial Roanoke County members of the Board of the Roanoke Valley .~ October 23, 1991 the Roanoke Valley. He reported this was the first time in America that rail transportation will be used to haul solid waste from a transfer station directly to a landfill. He announced that they plan to have the solid waste at the landfill at 8:00 every morning for the landfill employees. He again thanked the officials for including him in the ceremony. 2. Comments b Harr C. Nickens Chairman Roanoke Count Resource Authority Supervisor Nickens pointed out that the histories of the Roanoke Valley and Norfolk Southern have been linked together for over 100 years. He recognized that Mr. Goode was a Roanoke County and Vinton native, and thanked the County staff for working so hard to make the landfill a reality. Following comments, Supervisor Nickens as Chairman of the Roanoke County Resource Authority and David Goode signed the agreement for transportation of solid waste to the new landfill. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 5:10 p.m., Chairman McGraw declared the meeting adjourned. Following adjournment, there was a signing ceremony and reception hosted by the Town of Vinton. Steven A. McGraw, Chairman ACTION NO. A-111991-14.a ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ratification of inactive status of Health Department Board of Directors COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Health Department Board of Directors was established in 1985 by a former Health Department Director. Roanoke County appointed one individual for a two year term to the Board, and the Board was active for several years. Since the appointment of Dr. Molly Hagan as Director of the Health Department, the Board of Directors has not been an active organization. Dr. Hagan advises that she currently has no plans to activate the Board, and recommended that the Board of Supervisors not appoint a member to serve at this time. If she decides to reactive the Board of Directors, she will inform the County and the Board may then appoint an individual to serve. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board individual to the Health Departmen time as the Board is reactivated. a letter of appreciation be sent thanking her for her willingness t of Supervisors not appoint an t Board of Directors until such It is further recommended that to former member Anne Renner o serve in this position. Respectfully Submitted by: ~Qh,v~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~~ a Approved (~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Bob L Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Health Department Board of Directors File Dr. Molly Hagan, Director, Health Department ACTION NO. A-111991-14.b ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Request to increase the number of vehicles authorized in the County fleet by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~„~~f BACKGROUND• The Board of Supervisors previously established an authorized inventory of vehicles for use by the various departments. Any new vehicles authorized by the Board during the budget process would have the effect of increasing the authorized number, however, a replacement authorized in the budget process requires that an old vehicle be disposed (sold at auction). The fire and rescue department has one such vehicle for disposal and has requested that the vehicle be authorized for assignment to the new Read Mountain Fire Department as a utility vehicle that can transport additional personnel to calls and to be able to pull a vehicle extrication trailer that will carry specialized tools and equipment. Roanoke County would continue to own the vehicle and the insurance and operating expenses would be shared in the same fashion as other expenses of the Read Mountain Fire Station. FISCAL IMPACT• The insurance and operating expenses will be shared as all other expenses at the Read Mountain Fire Station and no additional appropriation is required for the Fire and Rescue budget. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the vehicle inventory to be increased by one vehicle to allow the Read Mountain Fire Department to use this vehicle as outline above. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, /John M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- - ACTION VOTE Approved Motion by: RnYLL JnhnG~n No Yes Denied x Received Referred To (x) /( ) l ) ( ) ( ) cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Rita Busher, Director, Diane Hyatt, Director, Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Assistant Administrator Fire & Rescue Management & Budget Finaace X x x x Abs _ ~, ACTION NO. A-111991-14.c ITEM NO. "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer and water easement in connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III Project to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of an easement for sanitary sewer and water purposes over and across property located in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke in relation to the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III Project as follows: a) Donation of a sanitary sewer and water easement, of variable width and triangular in shape, from Roger E. Rardin and Deborah P. Rardin (Deed Book 1069, page 809) (Tax Map No. 65.00-02-53), shown and designated as "NEW 40' WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, dated January 14, 1991, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 13, page 148. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by the County's Utility Department engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this property. Respe tfully submitted, •\ Vick'e L. Hu a Assistant County Attorney s - K-`~ Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. ,Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Cliff Craig, Director, Utility ACTION NO. A-111991-14.d ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easement to the County of Roanoke for drainage purposes in connection with the Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project in the Catawba Magisterial District: a) Donation of a drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd, also known as Lois R. Boyd, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1256, page 746, and Deed Book 1284, page 282) (Tax Map No. 25.01-1-8 and No. 25.01-1-24) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated October 23, 1991. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this property. Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. ffman Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Bob L. Johnson Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Cliff Craig, Director, Utility METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COl-fPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE B 0 UNDARY SURVEY. CqR V jNS ~~ ~~ s6, s8 c~~~R ~o E D, n'` i i o"' ti 2 k O ~e o ... ~ ti PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (BOTH PROPERTIES AS SHOWN) - O 0 \O~ ? CV ~~ ti o~~q 0 ~o ~ ~ ~~ ti °Q~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ ,~ ti ~ti ~ ~ J k 2~v q ~~ ~O .Q. Q 4S 00, 4SOp, i o ti ~O ~~ ~/ ;, 4 ti =o Q ~~ ~~ - --~ 4 S, 70' ~ / ~' 15, 26 N17'30~ ~~' ~/ -~ BELDpN DRIVE TAX MAP N0.25.O1_1-24 & 25,01_1_8 PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED 15 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TD RDANDKE COUNTY BY ROBERT C, AND LDIS A, BDYD of i o•'' ti =o k ~Q SCALE: 1 IN_ = 40 FT. PREPARED B Y.• R OANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 10 / 23 / 91 /~'-I COIINTY OF ROANOR$, VIR~3INIA GENERAL FOND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE $ of General ~ 1> Amount Fund Expenditures Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1991 $4,269,399 6.10 and Balance as of November 19, 1991 Submitted By ~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25 of General Fund expenditures ($70,036,927). ~-a COONTY OF ROANORE, VIR~iINIA CAPITAL FIIND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 6,097 August 15, 1991 Sale of Shamrock Park (Board approved sale on March 26, 1991, Sale Finalized August 1, 1991) 34,914 Balance as of November 19, 1991 S 41,011 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N-~ COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RLSSRVE FOR BOARD CONTINaB~TCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 50,000 July 9, 1991 Additional funds for Alleghany Health District (8,000) July 9, 1991 Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (3,000) Balance as of November 19, 1991 S 39,000 Submitted by /,rQJlle.j /V • ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - October 1991 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $2,255,548.01 Payroll: 10/11/91 $ 453,533.08 10/25/91 466,013.62 10/28/91 161.35 919.708.05 $3.175.256.06 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, ~~n~~~ ~ . ~~~ Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance Approved by, { ~-~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens Robers ,,_____~ rJ ~ 4,/ ,- 'v~.__ ti.r~ J __~v.:/ V.,J.. u' ~J .~/ ~ W~ ~.J ~ V 4._ _ -..{ , ' - t^ R ~1 C W ~ ~ ~n I Y ~ ~ _: V C q ~ Y W J ~L yy U e~ sn W t l~ !• _. ... _ l i '~. ' ~.I ;I i ~ I P-,:- ~~~~-.ONM~-W ~f (`NMiFN ~-PU7 .-P tl7MNMmMm{71 r-~ 00 N o N Ui V• N IL71 In In p o P p M m ' ' ' ' N `- f ~*^~ // ~ ' 1 I I r 1 I .. M tt U1 M V ifl .- ~ U7 N -- N M ~ ~ V OJ U~ N '.7 M a~ Ifl 7 N J~ G+a0 N N ~O .- J~ I~ N iU Lfl -,- D+ O o to as 'q• {!1 ! Q 'iR rr I / j ' m i 1 C Di,l I a I ':I I M~ MMMMaO VIVO roMUt 7'iv a0 .-o (~-;N a0 io O00 Wc. Ul kil ln; ~ ~ ~.- , it ; \ 1 L H!I a+..n 6+,. M ~--DDM~O ap N? 6+U~ ~N.. [~:.- J' 0+11716 .•-NPIC++ N~ N M N i i L 1 ': I (U M o V' '~ ~ 7 ~ j ~ i ;.- N N ~1 N iP+ 1, ~ W W I I 1 I i I IV' lt7 lfl 7 N to ~N l!1 U N Ift 00 m M ~o o M ~N m~ W N ~ M ~N lfl ~ W T o ~O j hO .O U' F- I T : I N h m M u~ ~- N G+ .o c. .- m P N o V' 7 Ip~ .- o P N b N' o M <n N; N m OI ~~ ¢¢ ' 1 ., T.i Nu o~o6m~oNf~ V"C.~N N.MM N.o MV' a+: MI11 I, Nino Mi 7 ~o of ~I '~ ~ ' i r C I 0+ .O M M N V' V u N M ob ,- '~f ~~'~.a N to G. M O~ '~ N Ul N OJ 1I1 ~- ~ I : N IO h! I : o! ' ~. ' I C O 1 ' I O : I ~ 0 0) t- N. N M .- t!t M ~- N~ N o .- F ~- N M R M *- ~ MNI '~ .- i ^ i~ - M .- i ~ N lV :, ? I O' I ITIJ N ; I i ; ~ j i ' c I I I ; 7 0 0 0 0 0 O O q 0 ~O O o O O O b 0 0 ~O O i O o M In 0 0 0 V' M I? O ~ ~ 'M ~ I I,M ~ ~~ } I N o 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 Oo 0 0 0 0 0':.0 0 o a o~ y o W O' o 0 o M oIM to I ~ ' ' jd i~ - LL r ' i aD o 0 0 0 0 0 o'f-Moo t(1 M p Ul P-,o op o N M ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 l!1 0 Io o ' ' :I a I I ~ I U ' I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .. ^I ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ M ~o o U1 0 0 0 'o O o N o W v O O+:M Ul U1 U1 N -- o N U7 ~06 7 0 ~..- .- Itr N I !aD I ;W I ' ~ :1 L ' I V' o Ul N P to m W V' N - V• ~ l11 Ul Ul .- N o'.. t!1 ~- M Ifl'M 7 !n 0+ M~,.- M :UY to ' i 11 7 '~ 1 Q' M N P v M ~f N V~ M M N N a0 ~'Q I N! !n N ~ M,M N o m illt !N I j I ~ I CA I I ^ ^ - ~ ~ ; '. I ~ 1 M ~ ~ ''~ : ~. . _, I' ~ jF ~~` I ', I I I U"I M Ul o,N .- •- •- !il M;o O N .O !N P F e. M'1~- N eU ~~m 47 N US e+ ~t~ o ,F ~ ~ IN ; N'. I 1 r '1 c• o. P .- m 0)P N Ui .-,M In W 7 M '~tN O'o N P'o N ?'W !N o U~ N M N' a+ mi I ' :' '.I C Cl: I 7'w' O Ul? 00 N P !n N o P W 7:N .- W •- •-.M O ~O I!Y F-;N .n O'1O jV m Ll1 Illy I ' ~ 'I L1-.I N !n ?'.P ap i~ o:MMODI~OP.6 io :NN o.-NO0.U1P'V•o~no NIoD .-'. I I ; I L I I 117 N of c+.c0 Ul .~'OJ .- V' '.~D U .- tY ~ M Mlo+ M !n iM !o+ ~ IV ; Y I I :1 7L~I I ! ~.-I oNI~ ~N .-m ~ oM' ~ v !o o~ I i I . 1 ! .- I •-~ { '~h ~; f~ ~ c ~ ~ i I I i G~ ', 1 I I .. ~' 1 I j l I irl N P M.M• CU W G• Q? N:h1 c+i~ o'f~ .- V',117 117 oloD ~ •-'•- In OpO o CU '.00 tN T ' IN - 'N ~ I '' .- ro I .o N m:o N V' W !N o o+ ut P N:c M N:~ ~n «J P N In -r'M VI eD !V' M 7:1~ oD Im '~o+ , ~,' ~ I a~ 7 ' I V'.m o lh V o] N.G+ LO No c~.W V'~N .- O .- ~'.M o :~ to N-.N P o;o ;7 m IW !tn j I 0.~ '.o V ~~ I o ~~ N ODiU7 - P v o ~O o 117.E ~~N U1 st o+ m~~.- o -~M M n) ~ a~ m'o ~,N N .- O+ 0+ ¢ I UlN OJ G~aD W ~ U .•V ; ~ ~ .- : ? .- M M: 0~ M NM P j'p V : a L }• q ' i LL F- i ' I ~ ; 1 ~ ~ ' 'F I ,,F I i Y O ' I } I i ` ! I ~ ' I C ro N I ! I I I j : ~. ' i ; : o 0 o O~ 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 ~. 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 '~ O!. C+ O Ij} 0~~, 0 0 ~7'OO O•; O a0 . ' lap ~ i .Oi j I O a I ; 1 ; 1 ,P U5 .- W o aD o M o o o U5 ~,.o h-:~ W P O'.o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0.O 0 0 0 o ' ' IM M. , , 2 7 I I r i i . ~; o Lf7 I~IO ~ M:R U7;N N 0 ~l0 0 0:0 0 0 0 L17 0 o O o o Lf7iQ+ N QJ '~D o !l17 111, . I i4- a ' I 41 '. I P'~.o 0 0.6 0 Oo (t! olU7 Ul o.o Ut,-- N st' ~O Ul'i 06 N 00 W o P Oy el•'; .- ~ ~ j~ ' . ~''~ f I ' O > .I •O I . ~O o D-I~t 7j~ M i^•lo 0 o'ap o .a'LA o U'I~ M oo ~.F o7 M O dI M N .- 0• OD o) , ~ ~ 7 l , P o M M M Ul :.- M M M N N c0 N ~- ~O N .- .- : M 7~ i O ; u V' 100 06I ?. ~ I ~r j q i II I o.'M .- ~' 7 ~~N ~ i j M N-:N Ih ~ ~ ;~ .o; j C 0. '. I I I M ~^ I i ~ II ~I 't r' F f I 7 O i - ~ i I ! I ~ I 10 i U C I ~~! 1 ! I U~17 ~ V'n N ol~ N -- of ~o NOU ~'o U M'o 0+ 06',N o M N N N~'o M P,~o U5 0)'o U7 NNo~ '~-•0 ? 0N OnM V"N V'mM~D M' ~ ' ' ' '~o ~~ I~ :~O _ O ''~ N jI ;1 t .~ '' 1 , . ap R ~9 o-mcU '-N ~-~W ~o i ,o In Lfl M ,M V 00 ~ V f~ M!N ~- ?;N'Q N UI .- ~O~W Q' ODIN V' N!C' U misi G~ N:N Lf1 W'v c+.~.V V''. ~M M ~I b i 1 7 1 ~ I ^j . ^; ^ N M!o C JI '7 O~r- UIrP R' M~tlO 00 0+1O N M.~ 1o ^M V' P~U .- o .- N V W ~- V' D { ~0 L t j 1 ; , M o N~~O f- V' M'? W .O UI N N~' M o N tn .-' ~- ^ P N 0' 00 V' 7 CU ~ P M ~ M N I i b { d I r I V ~' I . . . ; j I jv . o,.o N M:. V' ISM M M M N ~:h iN N NI Tt,N M 0+!M N NSF N to ~' M I IM i E O Io d 1 ;G+ ! I .i I ~ I i ^ I O+.N .- V' ~ N ! ~ 7 II ~N G+. stn ~ ~ I o o! P M O CO N O .- st,~ M: o+ P o:o o N. 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o o', r- o o I~ F~ i I} ! I N io 0 ~; 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 O',o o;. ~ o W o U'i. N o o a• o. o .- P-? M: ~- M F i Fi ~ ~ 'ILL r i. ( r- X01 V' ~D R'1O o X10 o OO O O o o O,,O NI U~ O Nlfl C0~•t r-.O ~ 71,0 M 7: ~O Oi ~ ; 7 ~ it I m I j .-'~o N M' V~ o o ~~o o I11 0 0 0 !.o U7 ~. M o IN M' ~ .o N ~- a0 0 <!• F IF ap' N N i V' R, ~ I . U I I L ~ 1 r-'.ln 00 P'.h o .~o .O N 0.l M III :.o .-~.o N ~ h; ~:Q M N~N M ~'.W jo a0 Ln ~~ I . I I ! 1 7 I tnd o N', N Ul ~- N M N N ~- N V' ! ~I M:N M m;M N oil joy ~O M' M; i ' ro I II i N I.-~ : RAN j j ; j a I m , ~ ~ rn I I ~ I m I I O I ~ ro a I 1 j T ! a l j j ! I LO O. ~ N '' r r ~ { I. L E N'. ~ L ~ I I I , I .. ' ' T a ~ U . -.~ C ~ N' ;. ! I o a~.. iva ~ 1 ¢m ;o I I G. N j a~3 UI I '~ C O I N NI a ~ i.- ; ' I I ~' !N INrO'.a LL al I I O L W a..+U ~I j I i is ro ! x i.y x~IJt ! N ! ',Ed •.I~ip ..a a ~ ~ , ; N x~ a N'O I a UI~, N a >. V> b U ' x L r ~ a ~+- 0. W E 7 L' •~ L •~'. L ro O N:. h- N` x N C F- O a o ~ i f- d a, F- ro CIO x ; O N; U. j N L' O O a; N C !~ N i L a d, 7 i ! ~ I L U 0. F a'. .~+ N E:U. a a 7; U~~ L a '., .•+ N` O u0 I O ~ ~ ~ a N N,; a a •.~ OI> J< ~ ~N NIT O a'O ~ U}rF O'; at OI ' ~ i ~ alr U r' r: a ~~+ N O'.'O LL C iLL a ~+, Ul N >; O N r+! a r+ +~ { x L C 7 x •.+- N J U a 0!:; a I ~~ OI d, U U Lj L~ Ui Ut N. r b u QI ro:a a.. a ro~ C L N ;L :V -r L4-I a0_ VN a•..; i0 •.I •.+iC O Z j ' ; r l a u •.. 1- •~+ a x a O C ~-+ b O .+ ' L ro L'! E E N( UI N, V N V i U U L: •~ ' •~ C O O O V I ' ! I~ LL •.+ 7 L O ' O O U 7 O O •++ W, J r U N ~•-~:. U a a d L ) ~ ' i ~ a ffi W C O U U.! L L LI a 0 U L a Vi ai L> N~ •'I !- U a U r; a l0 r; 7 I r,0^ L I1CC a jJ •~~a'•~ OjL a CIO] ~U 4. IL O L a O d ,r N ' ' J I i ! I I ' ! O U x W I N W r! C UI T •O'. Y-~ N C N a s r~ .-. N; a L J ~' n. x O: r '+ UI •~ ro L' UI Ul a. C ~ N V: V i 4- d C' N N L iG Gr a W , r N .~ L Q F- JJ~I Q~ 1 ! N I N r. r (A a' UI ~-+ >~ O a w: I F- '', C N j 0 O NI a a N [0 .~ L r a'~ to a U U_ d O !1"^{I I ! I W I C U •.~ C E; a t r '- ~-+' ro r ; U : 7 7 a l ~••~ a. N V L': L i w J] a> U a N'i L N t : L N N ~ ! c O UI C C O ' : ' F O F j W W I ~ a .. I O ~.~+ -+ a ~-+ 7: C U L N ~•+ ~. N L a -+ a:. a s E' V E N' L r a a a L E V O 1 L wl a w a a C '+~ U .-~ ro. E N N! ~-+ C O y j to ! , N~ L J] C: T U C" N N r x ~.. r x L ••+: C L a'. a O C>> N.~ N U C ro ~'L A L L b Q ; a s 7 a N O 0i 7 L O N r O ro r C N a a'. -~ t •~* a s L, a •.+ N O L al r a r! r L Z' i ~. it I ~'addaJU,61 lL~HOSf-04,JO.U.:U a. It::~~U~,~EOC,Z fn 3;O3 O1O F- ~ I i Q CI L :' Z 10 ' o~.-NM V~o.-'NMst lf7 .o f~W Po~N V;1~-o?c~'or-N;o~~n o.-~1M O.CNM I ~ I ~ ' ' I U O. I U^ a ~i O; '~ G+P NNUl .O ~O a[11N OD 1? V V r-~-~-~-NNNNNNNNNNM.MMM,;MMt ofooo,oooaoo!ooolooo:ooo~oooooooodooo!ooooo I~ o ~ I i I I r I ._ -,:, QO ,-,_ a ^ .~ 00 o~ o^ ww ~~ ¢¢ ~. q N C O ro L a' O L a^ ac q' bM )cam ro b A N W . d I- .u¢ ~Cq ro F.LL" uao ~E ) 7 N V ¢ oc W I . _ Yd Z Lo .~ ~' • M a ~•+ x 4. W 7~ wo o d O d i .C U y i j I l i E I i i i j f i I 1 j b 4- I I C a O d E' r I Q 7 \ d I x U ~ I ~ W C ;ro L I j W I ] i q N m H W ,ro I r i I I b d L d I I ~d U 1 ' E ro 1 ] '" 1 U ro 1 'C 00 I I ~d 1 iC i ' I p N. t d'Iw I I L W 1 I ] tE 1 ' •.~ ~U p •O iC F C W N I ' d I ` 4?b 1 x ~ I ~, f W~rnd l l !C U I i i M C 1 !I i "t7 ro 1 ~' C L ro a r. r E 1 N ] ( ' r U I ' ] C I O W I -. N I d I i L ~ 7 1 ~ I 1 IL I li Ir V I ~ C C I ; ~O d I i s a I j x I ~ W I I .. d I i U I ' 'O I 1 ] I j i m 1 , it I i d E ~ ~ ' ` ~ ~ i j ~ I 1 I ~ I - i f~ N I a s i ~ r l I L I i' ~I. Q 'O Z! ' i ~y ~ ~ II - 1 .a j ' I .( I I • J+w d- ~ 1t Y ~ h 0 C~ ~j i; i I i 0 I q I •i I y r I I{ 1 f I 40071 OM1 o W •i P h ^ ' sl•M M j 11100 Q~'. o M o N ~ h (`- N ^ ' o CDT00~ a0 .- T .- M }^7^~ h I M M i at' h ~O I p ~ 7 ~O h II l11 ~D : M N N 7 i c 00~w' c o ^ N N McO+' N hNh1 00 aNtn~ N M a+ ] M ~ ,, h 3 I ' ti M N { M f'1^7~ c N I'1 ^ ~ F ~^ ~ O ~ ~' { to r`aw{ c 00 h h i ? o^N' l11 o.O h~ M Ntl1^ c ~; 1 ~; v i E ro V L j 6 r N; N .+ ~ r C rol C ..+ •.+ ~ d E U; E L •.+ ~ C ¢ 0. L 0.{ d .+ O i > ro } o •.+ W j O V C b ~ .-~ C roI L „~ p' d ~~.m~ c d vM kJ N ~ (Q r rol ro .~ L i o ^~ ro Oi o FN d UI o IBC dI d d .•~ 09 W I O O 0! ^N~1 1 0 0 O J M ~ ~ _i,~ il• 1 J I .~-~ »; *I W Ws Z ! ~~ (9 r .. N (/j 1- N ¢ q' I W Z a ~ C9 N 1! i N et N ¢ o Z o I ~' O dF { i •1t t of o ' OI O I ', G+W Oj 111 O~C+t7h ^'-^hh.-^^ ooMC I oN^ o+lflNNb Ntp W ^M.O lil ~ 007111 ODN7~'~. Mlfl lli~N oNh00oom'~ ~ti^ N M^ ''~ M M M M M i M N N M 7 M N' M M ~ i : !1 1f1 .-a''. +- O'~00M~'uN O O~[Oh.-h O, M oMON I hLfl , 7 0~ W 7lfl .o W OD.-cNM h-. h oN~N Mc^' 7 ~OOlltoh o tfiG+W ~Oh^7' 7 o7otll Molfl m 111 N N glno ^~7O ol11MN ~ 507 o aO~No.- W OhO+.-7~0 .O! 7 Nhlflc ! ~ , V' N h to h 7 N ~- o ~ 7 ~- M^ 7' h ': M M l11 i ^ i ~! N p In ; h 7 v7 0 7 .- ~7 M h a0 :~ lfl b Ifl ~P j 111 C67; q 7OCUio P 111111OtDMO111; ~b O lnN ' T p. OD ! d h^ M M h N M 7 o M CD 7 .- ~ U1 0 ^ h b7 ~o bMh77 O O?~NUU V'Ndi ~C o 0~7 : W.- P 7h h^l11 •o MNh W O+h Pj OD N N7 ~ j N ODCh^ h I11dN N ~M j ~ ^ '~ i M! 7 tt7MUlo (~ ~ cci0 ~D ~0 O c: O+ OoNtn M ~ NTf'1 7i, o c: i CU O~ o Nc~NLO 111 '~. o c W W:~ 7 c~ ' fU N P o 00 00 ~tl l!1 i CU ~ ~ ~~. !t? MI N 1 ^! M 1 j ^ i i ~ 1 i i j ' ;,. j j i t I ~ i I ~ I j I III y i. ~ ' ,. I ~7N o a. 00m~.op N h'ohc111cc~ c b w';o 1 'v 0 7{ ^ m .e/ r• m h a m 'M O ~o c M .- I v a0 ^ ,7 IO' N ~O ! o t~ h OD o h N o ,0+ 111 O+ p N L(1 ~ M w o (11 I 1 IP .G 7 ~11 p c .c N l0 [n I..n M h h h •- i M .- M1 .P j ~I 111 N ^.i 00 P N 00 M .- b~ 7 OD I`.^ 7 I 00 i+ 7 h ' ~ ~ MN GO ~ .-^~ ~ 7 i f ~~' ! j ~ 1 pp O O{ N o 000 L,M M tit N ~^ o T {11 lA h j P M ~O ~h i i . ~D ao o~ N I!1 h h -:0 111 Lfl M 7 N 111 ~•- 7 N i M I N ^111 N00 0~ -- M~ U'.77 M m;T 06 oU~ If1 aC: o ct N.N ~7 (f1 ~O i d N ~t N ~lll h ~N .o ~.o W O d~ 7 i' aD th M N i 7 t11 ~ o N M o .- .~ 7 N ;c .Lt P ~'i M u~ i N ~ h h 7 '. ~O M 0 7 h N M^ 00 ^ ~ o h u7 N ~D ; an M G+tn ', i ~ .- 1!1 N N :' ~b ~ N C I ~ ^ i I I I o u o' ]• ! ~ > j0 L .~ d O '+~- to r i w . d ' ~~ C'. rot ~:. ? I ;ro M:O '>. Lr N ~ d l :L 'C !r r; ~~ N ~I 0.i ' L I ~ Cb b- C, ~ ~I L O; l r c{ b ;d u ov a ~r ad rnaL; a -+-+v•.. .+ r, ] 'U N C!•~ C ~] ;CAN U C E d' ] 'ro ro C'. N ro •~" ti !L d O'r O '~, ri..... C •~+ O Nj d !d d d N d 3'~ '~O ~ •~', V U C1J q ro,L V ': .2 2 r'¢ NC Ei o ;C~b U:L••+ 'o r!r d d d dro', o L+ U•~+,U '~, '. r O •~, N W d'r ro M U1' d N r C O~ L', 7 ro •~ L .~ 1 L E r'. o d L N E a •..., d] C •~ ro d ,. o ''.. r .+ d ~. •+ ~~ U E U i ~i 3 L L C •~+ ~ N! L 4- •~+ Q~ L C' ' C a ~. a I I O O •~+ I : ro ~.+ O O C N r d ro C ro d '~ , d ] 7'] ''.. IC) U>; J Irt. VDU ¢ ¢,tA OC E W t1 W:~ ~ d N,O.. 0 o U1~ ~0 0 00 111 I olln o 111 0 l11 0' `o ltl o'.ln t^ N N~ ^ N M'7 7 ~ ~-'-- N N M M 7'. IN N M'M ' N N N ~.M M MM M 717 7 7 7 ~' 71, L/1 lf~ tll l11 ',O O O~ O o C!'.O O O,O 0 0 0 0 Oi :O 0 0 0 ~ ~ • ! ~ '~ I t _ _ _ ~ O d I ..~ t.. ~ b - - - ... .. ,. ., . .n ., .. • .. ., .. , N ~ j i ' 0 0 ', ~. o \ ~ : ~, i o ._ ~ - ~! I o wW ~' I ~~ I ' II f ~ :..~• I '~ i o ~~:F ^ , V ~f~- m ^ N a0 W O+ N T ~o , .- O+ '0 0 0 ~'O 0 0 ~ ' I CnO I oIO+O+ m~,cONeDM ' ' ; ooV.-f-,op No.oooooo ! ~ ' a E' Y 1 1 d 7 ~\ a I L ~o O i . ~, . . t~ o o~ N In , ^ f7Y l71 VIN I p N -. x U' ~ 1 '. o;M V N'M N N AD M ^ N fU N!V ~- ~ I '~ W C' ro V I j ^ ~ . W, 7 1 I ! , ', ~ ~ q ~I N m 1 i ~ ~ F W ; ro 1 ! ' '. ' ' j I I . r l I~ . ~ ; . .. ~ I ~ ~ i In j ~ N 1 I "~oD of F UI'M o o 'a m l F M V'V ^ N M I 0 0 0 t11 o N; o c0 o ! C L a I ;. ;N aO In 1l1 ',M ~-No .-! NNONO~N V m~.o V omoM'. . N O ! I ~ a U t inn m i~ 00 ~~ N N 'o V, N^ N l11 t~ :a0 M j ~ o m; N M o m o c~ ~.. ~ E N 1 ~M V iV V Im N O 'M o ' N V ~^ ^ N~1~ o~ a6 OIO V o M o [p;, a0 ~ ! ro ! ~ ~ 7 ~•+ 1 ~ ; V O ^ o w aS .- F ~. F .- 111 c+ Vl : m I. m m o~ o I to o; m : ! f i. L- i i C m 1 ~ i i i I i tl ~ s I I N ^ ^ I ' j O C I I ; ~~ j I i ', ; i I L '~ I , ~ ! I ~ a ^ ~ ml i ~ ~o ' M o M U1 ~ Ifl~~l" , W :~ I 111 Ni ^ N' ^ j ; d o+; 6 \' - a I , L:n I j V it0 ~ CjM O~ M ~!] M V M ifl Op V 171 M a ; .-, N ^? UJ o'. III NI, . . lIl 0+: m M; N j . t i ^' , -. 7'E 1 ,, o~.M T ~',N , IIIM N W'V1 ql•, 1!1 N N N V.N o~ ^ m'. u w'. ' ' ro C \~ -d U D I '~ ~CIjT V 'L71 O~!oD V N:'I~• IIt' V V m o f~~. U1 ' N', V 7: M oDi . -.. ro o~ ~ ~ C 1-^ 1 i ,-~o V ~tfl N:aO M M'.- +o, M .- N M ^ m:, c ^ O: f•- ' a! I ~ j I ~ I~ N W T F a'b I j ~ ~ ~ E COI ro i ; rn a . C V i '~, ~ j~ ~N m'. N ~ o o f :, .I ~ m ' L lL! i.+ C 1 j M M t"/.~ M: '. .- I UY! I11 ~ ~c E ' ~ ! C L I B ~' ,: I , O 71P ': ! 'Iron I ~ ~ i N V F' ~ ^ IroC i N71! ~7 C 1 j ; ~ _ 2' !O W I i ~ ' ~ : i V- N F,.i I ~ ; ;. ~ L O' ~ a 1 ~ ~ aD aD ) {J11 r. V ~ •- ~D Ut _~ In .G; o j I w N~ '.o N! G+ ' T 7 S', L I i W N V'IF N G~ 111 V Ul N 1f1 V i M G~ IM O N In O~ ~ r r T 7 I ~ :m oi. ,p M i o m N.N o gyn. m~ V ,-, '.7 ~ d: '.iL ••, I ~ ,N 'ln o!I!1 0] ~ V~ N V N N 111:: F~;, ~- U1 Ut' V` :O C Uj I ;jr V I I N I ~~tn olc~ o N V .- o+; W! ~~ c•~ `U a ~' C C I ' ~N ^ N. i ! ! X• w i O a 1 '. ~ a 1 ' ~ I ~ ~ w x 1i ~ ~ ~ I I `~'! ~ w ~ ~ I ~ I w o~ ~' O I ~ 1 V;t~V ^ I I ^NU1MO o Na'MOO'.- : N~ No~o0 0 O ' N I I ~ ~ V ! o~ ap N sY:' 1~ ~n UI : o M' V M Ul -- o' oD N : o V o o V ~ ' V ' a ' ~, ' ~+ I om C~ :~ Vlm c o'171 o+ 07 M~o M N,~o V': V o o u' o~ o I r- 7 1 7' O~ 1 m, N m 'o+ V P• ~o ~,o 1I1 .~ tb'~ N o, M N, N M o V o o ~ • o V 1 I a lLi ( V l j i 7 1 ~ ;ln o _ I M ~- Imo. ;N m:tn .- V-.N M N^ ~ M aD o N V N h•j^ v^ M ~- aD. o~ ^ o 0 o iIl V N ^. M N ~- N o te ' V ro 1 i M I N, I ~ ^ ^ to ; L I,. 1 1 ; ~ ~ ~ , '. : ~ '. ,, j ~ ~, ~ C i , ro M 7 D. (7 ~ I C i 1 7 ro'. ~ ro: C ~ N f '~ i. j ( ~ ( •.O. i ~ S ~ 7 I L' W ~ L~ ~ a'. E ~ C O N k t ~ r i L O C .. o o_ : v a ; ~ 1 ro a ! o o L 'Y o' ' c m L ... I ' M L i v a~ a c ., ' m m 7 m iN ro v ro a x M Y I ~ I ~ j C 'w i L >: ro C'' C' L > E ~ C ~ ro f .~•~ r L . a O~ V O t, a ~b E C 'fl a ! ~ OI a . I N a w L •~+' C •~+ 0;~, O O C a E 0 ~ { a! L i 3 G, C 4l' G U N' a 3 ~+, N ~ T U r a U 17( ~+ Lj O i O, •~+ '. a a P C E a ro a >: U1 .+ C d C r L ro. .a •.~ E O~ E ~ C a. d •.+ a U +~': L ~.• .••! x ro C ++ : ro k ~~ f r,: m t r' v Y t ~~ r' o> L L ~ • ~ , ... ! a L >Iw .-~ ~ a i I ~~a ,t ro~ ¢ 'u , cx'..ao7 c u- No ~ roo a t I. i - ~ ~ ,,,~` ~„~ U I w a N~ •.+ N O W'i a K O. O 7~ a lR .•~ d ~+; a w V q i t ro; ++ I••+ L' O C~ L .x N ;> VI N E:~ C 7 W L •~+, ~•+ U I I ~ ! f C, C> ~ N U U O~ C L a' a Y C a E~. a O\ •~ '17!.O TQ C !; ~ o''IaL 'a a' -..w ro .H>.gcro~ o; maw.darou o .. j I •.+~ > a IS W: Y vl d' +•~~ a L ~ U, C'~ a L! a C ?; Z ~ ~ yi ro N I C 7~ ~. U ~+ U E F. U ' a ro .~+ ~••~ U N a L ~N { 7: _ ! o w7. T ro n ro o' C N, •.~ d .•• o a .•..-. ro L U O o 1 ', ~ I I I Yi .+ ~ o I L ~+ L o .+ L'', E O U L o T .-. a C a' 7 C w. o ~ f I I •w' L N lfl UI ro Ul L 7 N' C a, O .. •.l O q~ O d W O N n •~+ C O+ !S ~ I II ~r ~..., o ac: L •~ r r o: C fS C a m r of ~-. U ~ 7' E +~ a o 'q I I Ulj 7 U I G.: n N C ~•+ ro O; O> n' N I O. Ut x OI u.j •.+ C i q _ ' " i G O O ' +O. ++ N O 7 .~ O~ U a 7. •~+ ' i E N a a:' a O C L ;i i ~•~+i ?- N dl J d U. V 2 U ,, W q d' _ W E~ 1- [C ~: lr U .. Y ! L q~ i j O, III O j ~ d O O O, O L11 0~: U1 O O O ~ O I!1 O 111 6 (jl O Ify' O i 2: ;. V:V 111 I --:MV Lfl'~D ~N:NM V111 ! --NMM V..V 111171 tn'Intn I r-rr-r~1~ aoasoawarco j c,~mmc~c~c~m ~ ~ ~ ( oio o f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ i I i ~ i i I j i , t _ j ; 1 •. _ _ ~ , -- _ __ _ _. _.. _ __ ___ _ ._.~ _. _. _- -- - _ - . Op O M o DD V N N U1 M ap N ~ N ~ N N 111 P O+ O N M M M ,m 'w M M ~ In M M ~ N 1!1 '111 O O M 'M M ~ M IM 'ln ~; to I,i In F ~• ~- ^ N :f~ V N ' ~ o (~ F a0 N I W V c~ I M 07 G+ M iM ! r +~ I 7 7 0 0 ' r I 7 I N N i O ' L L a a ! N 0.4- L N N a I C C 0. ro ro : N L L ; C j rr 'ro jL i vv ~• I C C 7 7 p IL ro ', O+ l a L ',o !rr ' C C I, H ~. b b c+ a, Ioo I - p A p g c 3 {~ __ ,,, N t n ~~ .- r ~ n _... i I ~ n' i, n r .. ~ .. , i , ~ ... j T ~ i j III l j : i ~ , ~ i, j I ~ I i, I :. - ~~. i j o o ` { ~ ~ ~ { I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ W I i I i ~ i ~ , aa~ f i ~ I ' ~ I j I , ao ~ ( ~ ~ i i , i ~ ~ I i I I i i ~ i I I ~ .L 4- I ~ ~ !U ~ ~ 'I : li i ' G C .O O 1 ~ ~ ' 1 d E V i ~ M i I ~ a7 m1 , ~. , ~ x ul rn I w c ro v i ~ i W ~ ~ i NCi i f C7 ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ' I Hw ro I t I C j ~ :L d I ': id U I b !1 ~p i to I ' O ~. i } . , I ..r I C I s I ~ ! IN N i ~ iC OD I i d ~ ~ ;d I I !n I71 ' ', ~ 1 w l i ~ I~ ~ ~ I ~ '. a~-~ m I ~ 7 E I. ~4 7 . ~ V M ro c~~ ~ ~+ 7 I I •.. u^ 1 :, m ao I .. ro o ~ v' c I- I F ul In i , 'M .•.. c w r 1 icu N ' ~ rnuiw~ aw I m m , ; ir. mr, x1 1 I u¢i w I y CA, N i ~ I ~ 'rny C U I i .- • f. LL ~ '•^~ C I I !fl lit. IN d O~ ;d ro I~ j 'tU N~ ~ ~ I :~ a ~ roa i i ~ ~. i 0 7 u~ , i c : ~ C U Q ~ ~ r E I ~ ~ ~ r, . ro C ~O 111 I:.~ ~ Ul 7 1 ~ ja U I N N f i I j i 1 I ,~ ~' ~ f i I ~ '~ I I J ~ ~ O mZ ~ I ~ N ~ i ~ '. L O ~T 7 S~ G v I L I I ~L(1 jln l17 ~ N. ~ _ : I ;1+ y I i ~ T 7 I ~ 'M M 1 ' ' ~ IC •.y J . I , -~~ i I i ~ , I . ~i ~ I E7 'O Q.{ . t ~ I .- ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I F: 'O C Vi ~ vL I I N ~ Cl N LO ~ C C I ''. ~ ~ ~ ~ , d tw x u, I ~. O v I s a I ' W i. I kp I I _ ( ~ i W f x l ~ ~ I I I I ~ 1 W I I ' ~ I I ~ i ' ~~ O ~I I ' I M ; M j ' ' I ~ 1 I _ ~ ~ I ~ F i d f ~ i I .. I ~ ~o d o ~ C ~ ! i ~. i .r 7 CI 7 I W i ~ V~ 1 W ~i 'I I a0 i :. i I ~ ~ I ~ _ V l LL : ~ 1 4f1 ' lfl ~ ! ~ 1 I I ~ i i f i y ~ 7 1 ~. , lfl UI i ~ ~ ,C .r ~ m 1 I I ~ ~ - i ! i I 1 , i U m I ! , ,~ .•. ~ ~ [(1 ~ i i h !~ ~ ~ ~ I ', 1 ~, ~ ~ ( i i ~ (. d { f °i I I I I I qp ~ I d. ~, j !d I 4. . i~ j I 'o j a- ; o ;Z ;~ i~ Q J F Q) O !- F I~ ~ I GI Z I, I , }~._~: n m e I'~rv m a m n __~ i s ACTION NO. A-111991-15 ITEM NUMBER'"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Monthly Utility Billing Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~l ~,~,t,.a~' . SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors has asked for a report on monthly utility billing. The staff has reviewed several alternatives to implement monthly billing and outlined the advantages and disadvantages, and the cost in time and money of each method. These choices are attached for your review and will be discussed in greater detail during the worksession. All commercial accounts are currently read and billed monthly. Residential accounts are presently read and billed quarterly. We currently offer monthly billing on an optional basis to customers who request it. The customer can now estimate his next bill and send us a check in the first and second month of his reading cycle to reduce the amount remaining on the third month when the bill is mailed. Since this requires manual processing, this same method would not be feasible on a mandatory basis. Cash flow should not be a major concern in the decision. Utility collections stay within $60,000 per month, and much of that difference can be attributed to usage variances. Of course there would be a one-time initial influx of money during the first two months when we are catching up with the last quarterly billings. The sale of the water revenue bonds has placed new restrictions on the water funds. Any budget amendments will need to be submitted to the Trustee. In addition, cash flow has been included in our bond documents. Any additions to the utility budget will require a rate increase or a transfer from the general fund. There are no excess funds in the utility budget to pay for these increases. As a part of the County-wide twenty position cutback, the Utility Billing Department has eliminated one Account Clerk II position this year. This leaves three people to handle all of the billing, phone calls, problems, and new customers. With the added strain from the rate increases, collection of utility consumer tax, and credit for the elderly, this department has reached the maximum level of work it can accomplish. A change to any of the monthly billing alternatives would require that this position be reinstated and the County cutback goal be reduced to nineteen positions. /V-(n The alternates reviewed by staff were: 1) Complete monthly billing - Monthly reading of all County meters and monthly bills mailed 2) Meters read quarterly, mandatory estimated bills sent the first two months of a cycle 3) Meters read quarterly, bills mailed quarterly with two additional stubs to submit mandatory estimated payments 4) Optional monthly payment 5) Optional monthly budget payment plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would like to develop an optional monthly billing plan (Method 4) to offer to the citizens. We would like to have this plan in place as soon as possible, but no later than July 1, 1992. In the meantime, customers may take advantage of our current optional method of sending in monthly payments if they choose. Additional costs will be included in the 1992-1993 budget. In addition, we would need to reinstate the previously deleted Account Clerk II position which is funded in the current budget. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ ~~~ ~~ Diane D. Hyat Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Denied ( ) mntinn o ;mplement AlternativeEddy x Received ( ) ~4 w;th no additional Johnson x Referred ( ) i PrcnnnPl McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget 2 /Y-L Method 1: Complete Monthly Billing (Monthly Reading of All County Meters) Description We currently read all residential meters on a quarterly basis and commercial meters on a monthly basis. In order to read all meters on a monthly basis, and do turn-offs for late payment on all meters on a monthly basis, we would need to add five meter readers. These meter readers would need a truck and computerized meter reading equipment in order to do their job. In addition, we would need five additional clerical positions (four new positions and the reinstatement of one deleted position) in order to process monthly bills, answer problems, process penalty notices and coordinate turn-offs and turn-ons. In addition, postage expense would almost triple and forms cost would increase. This large staff would not fit into the current office space at the Administration Building, so we would have to rent space elsewhere. Advantages 1) The customer receives an accurate bill each month based on his actual usage. 2) Leaks and other high usage factors can be detected earlier. 3) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly amounts rather than in large quarterly bills. Disadvantages 1) Extremely expensive - additional cost would need to be passed on to the customer. 2) Delinquencies would require more collection effort for a larger number of bills with smaller amounts. 3) Space problems - there would not be enough office space for the expanded operation. 4) Additional work for collections in the Treasurer's Office. Additional Cost 5 Meter readers and equipment $198,564 4 Account clerks and equipment 85,801 Forms 3,700 Postage 60,000 Rent of office space 139,392 487 457 Based upon our projected annual water consumption of 1,800,000,000 gallons this would add $0.27 per thousand gallons to the volume charge, and we would need to adjust the water rate accordingly. A customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an additional $16.20 per year for this service. 3 /V-lo In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money for this position is already in this year's budget and would not require additional funds. Implementation Time Required In order to implement this method, we would need to hire additional staff, find a new office location, order equipment and forms, and make the necessary programming changes in the computer software. It would require approximately four months to convert to this method. 4 n-~ Method 2: Meters Read Quarterly, Mandatory Estimated Bills Bent the First Tyro Months of a Cycle Description In this method, the meters would continue to be read quarterly. However, all customers would receive a mandatory estimated bill through the mail during the first month and the second month of their reading cycle. During the third month, the meter would be read and a bill sent to the customer showing the usage and charge for the quarter, with a credit for payments made on an estimated basis during the first two months. These estimated bills would be based upon the usage from the previous quarter. Since payment of estimates would be mandatory, this method would require an additional meter reader to handle the turn-offs from the monthly penalties. In addition, postage would increase greatly because of monthly mailings to all customers. We would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that was cut-back during the year in order to handle the increased phone calls and penalty notices. There would also be an increase in forms costs. Advantages 1) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly amounts rather than in a large quarterly bill. Disadvantages 1) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is too high. 2) Additional costs would need to be passed on to the customer. 3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office. Additional Cost 1 Meter reader and equipment $ 39,715 Forms 3,700 Postage 60,000 $103,415 Based upon our projected annual water consumption of 1,800,000,000 gallons this would add $0.06 per thousand gallons to the volume charge, and we would need to adjust the water rate accordingly. A customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an additional $3.60 per year for this service. In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money for this position is already in this year's budget and would not require additional funds. 5 /V-G Implementation Time Required In order to implement this method we would need to hire additional staff, order equipment, and make the necessary computer programming changes. It would take approximately three months to convert to this method. /' "~, Method 3: Meters Read Quarterly, Bills Mailed Quarterly With Two Additional Stubs to Submit Mandatory Estimated Payments Description This option is similar to Method 2, except that residential accounts receive one mailing a quarter which includes their current bill, and additional stubs to make mandatory estimated payments in each of the next two months. With this method, we can save the expense of monthly mailings to all customers. Postage will increase some due to the heavier weight of the mailing. We still need to add an additional meter reader position in order to make monthly disconnections, and we need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position to handle the monthly phone calls and penalties. Advantages 1) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly amounts rather than in a large quarterly bill. Disadvantages 1) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is too high. 2) Additional costs would need to be passed on to the customer. 3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office. Additional Cost 1 Meter reader and equipment $39,715 Forms 3,700 Postage 20,000 63 415 Based upon our projected annual consumption of 1,800,000,000 gallons this would add $0.04 per thousand gallons to the volume charge and we would need to adjust the water rate accordingly. A customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an additional $2.40 per year for this service. In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money for this position is already in this year's budget and would not require additional funds. Implementation Time Required In order to implement this method we would need to hire additional staff, order forms and equipment, and make the necessary computer programming changes. It would take approximately 4 months to convert to this system. This method would take a little longer to implement because we would have to design and order new forms. 7 ~~° Method 4: Optional Monthly Payment Description We currently offer optional monthly billing on a very limited basis. When customers call in requesting it, we tell them that they can estimate their own bill and make installment payments in the first and second month of their reading cycle. These payments must then be processed manually. In order to advertise this service and increase the potential use, we would recommend printing a message on the bills to contact us if they would like to receive monthly billing. The customers that have notified us would receive, with their quarterly bill, two additional estimated bills to be remitted with their payment during the next two months. In order to process large amounts of payments, it is very important to have some type of remittance advice sent in with the check. Since the payments are optional, we will not need to process penalties and make disconnections on a monthly basis, and therefore, would not need an additional meter reader. The insert bills would be sent without additional return envelopes to save on postage. Advantages 1) The customer can make but it is not required, 2) Least expensive of the monthly payments if he wants to, monthly billing alternatives. Disadvantages i) Will require manual effort to match estimated bill remittances with bills for mailing. 2 ) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is too high. 3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office. Additional Cost Forms 3 700 The money for forms can be covered within the existing Utility budget. In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money for this position is already in this year's budget and would not require additional funds. Implementation Time Required In order to implement this method we would need to order forms and make the necessary computer programming changes. It would take approximately three months to convert to this system. 8 jlf-c. Method 5: Optional Monthly Budget Paym®nt Plaa Description This option would work similar to the budget plans established by electric and gas companies. If a customer desires to go on a monthly budget plan he would contact the Utility Billing office to sign up for the service. As part of the service, he will agree to pay his utility bills on a monthly basis rather than a quarterly basis. Utility Billing will then compute the customers average bill based upon past history. The customer will then receive monthly bills based upon the computed average. At least once a year, the customers account will be adjusted to actual. Advantages 1) The customer can make monthly payments on his bill. Disadvantages 1) Once the customer signs up for budget payments, he must make his payment on a monthly basis or his service will be disconnected. 2) Additional work for collections in the Treasurer's Office. Additional Cost Forms Postage $ 3,700 10,000 $ 13,700 In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money for this position is already in this year's budget and would not require additional funds. Implementation Time Required This method would take the longest to preplan and to change the software. We would like to allow six to seven months for proper planning and testing of the conversion. 9 r ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the Youth Haven II Program Evaluation Report for the period from 2/27/87 through 12/31/89. Youth Haven II was officially open on February 27, 1987 and has exceeded their program goals during that period. ~' ~' e `' Elmer C. odge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers yquth HAV ~~~ Helping girls find their way home M E M O R A N D U M T0: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Board of Supervisors ,~ F1 FROM: Beverly T. Waldo, Director, Youth Haven II~~ ~"~ DATE: September 23, 1991 RE: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation ~~" N-7 -~ - :~~~ It is with pleasure that I forward to you our Youth Haven II Program Evaluation Report for the first 3 years of operation. In this you will see that we have exceeded our program goals. Many people have worked very hard to accomplish these very fine results and we are all very proud of a job well done. We hope that you will find this Report informative. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel free to call me at 563-4475. BTW/krf Enclosure cc: John Chambliss 5929 Cove Road, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (703) 563-4475 ., r-~ YOUTH HAVEN II PROGRAM EVALUATION 2/27/87 - 12/31/89 ~~~ N~? I would like to thank the following staff members for their hard work and dedication in persevering to produce this report. Claire Alasio for data collection and co-authorship. Michael Metz for data collection and analysis. Kim Farmer for typing numerous drafts before producing the final product. And finally, to all of the Youth Haven II staff for their ongoing support and understanding. Beverly T. Waldo, MSW Director N-7 YOUTH HAVEN II PR0GRA~1 EVALUATION 2/27/87 - 12/31/89 INTRODUCTION Youth Haven II was dedicated on December 14, 1986 and accepted its first resident on February 27, 1987. Because it was a new program, it was felt that Youth Haven II needed to be operational for at least three years before there would be sufficient data collected to provide a meaningful report. This is our first such report. From its inception, Youth Haven II identified the following measurable goals: 1) To provide a structured, community-based residential treatment program for female adolescents in the Roanoke area; 2) To work intensively with each girl and her family so that she may return home, where possible, and as soon as possible; 3) To offer a pre and post-dispositional placement option to the Judges of the Juvenile Courts; 4) To prevent adjudication, before the courts, in 60~ of our graduates during the first year after discharge; and 5) To improve social and personal adjustment, in at least 50~ of our graduates, as documented through standardized testing. The following is a presentation of narrative and statistical information about the population served by Youth Haven II during the calendar years 1987 through 1989. We have attempted to analyze whether or not the preceding stated goals have been met. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Youth Haven II serves adolescent females between the ages of 12 and 18. The program was designed for an average length of stay of 6 to 8 months with a capacity of 12. During the past 34 months, Youth Haven II served a total popula- tion of 45 girls. In 1987 there were 10 residents, in 1988 there were 21, and in 1989 there were 29.1 Admissions data indicate that 10 girls in 1987, 13 girls in 1988, and 22 girls in 1989 were admitted to the program. Discharges (including emergency, discretionary, and graduation) numbered 2 in 1987, 14 in 1988, and 18 in 1989. The average age for all residents, 1987-1989, was 15.35 years. The frequency distribution of the resident's age upon admission is presented in Table 1. 1 If one were to total these numbers, it would produce a total greater than the stated total population of 45 residents. This inflated total reflects a number of cases in which the length of a resident's placement overlaps from one calendar year to the next. In such instances, the resident was counted as having been served in both years. n-~ 2 TABLE 1 AGE AT TIME OF ADMISSION2 1987 1988 1989 12 0 0 0 13 1 1 4 14 2 4 4 15 4 2 9 16 0 5 4 17 3 1 0 n-~ Data on race reveal that in 1987 507 (n=5) of our residents were Caucasian and 50~ (n=5) were African American. In 1988, 53~ (n=11) were Caucasian, 43~ (n=9) African American, and 4~ (n=1) Other. During 1989, Caucasians comprised 62~ (n=18) of the population served, African Americans 35~ (n=10), and 3~ (n=1) were Other. Youth who came into placement were from either Roanoke City or Roanoke County.3 Legal residence of the youth who came into placement during this period is shown in Table 2. 2 The frequency distribution was derived from the chronological age in years, excluding the months after the resident's last birthday. The average age upon admission for all residents was calculated using the chronological age in years and months (since last birthday). 3 This does not necessarily mean that jurisdictions other than Roanoke City or Roanoke County were not referring cases. It may be that cases were referred, but found to be inappropriate, or that cases were referred, found to be appropriate, but no funding stream was available to effect placement. (Youth Haven II did not become a Title XX vendor until January, 1989.) 3 N-7 Roanoke County Roanoke City Salem City Other TABLE 2 LEGAL RESIDENCE OF YOUTH 1987 1988 1989 20~ (n=2) 19~ (n=4) 147 (n=4) 80~ (n=8) 81~ (n=17) 86~ (n=25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Referrals came primarily from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts, Departments of Social Services, Sanctuary Crisis Intervention Center (Other Agency), and in 1987, there was 1 parental referral. Table 3 indicates the percentage breakdown of these referents. TABLE 3 SOURCES OF REFERRAL 1987 1988 1989 Department of Social Services 60% (n=6) 47.6 (n=10) 27.6 (n=8) J & D Court Service Un-its 30~ (n=3) 47.6 (n=10) 44.8 (n=13) Other Agency 0 4.8~ (n=1) 27.6 (n=8) Mental Health System 0 0 0 Parent 10~ (n=1) 0 D TREATMENT SERVICES DELIVERED Youth Haven II provides services to meet the basic needs of its residents such as food, ongoing clothing, shelter, medical and dental care, and personal care and grooming supplies. Clinical services are a cornerstone of the program and include milieu therapy (primarily composed of a combination of behavior modification, cognitive and RET 4 N7 therapies), structured study halls with tutorial assistance, an in- house summer school program, individual, group, and family counseling, Parent Support Group, recreational and leisure time activities, an Aftercare program for program graduates, community meeting, and a Drug/Alcohol Education Group (facilitated by Prevention Plus personnel). There were 232 formal4 individual counseling sessions held during 1987, 365 during 1988, and 323 during 1989. Formal Family Counseling sessions occurred at the rate of 43 in 1987, 61 in 1988, and 59 in 1989. A total of 177 group sessions was held in 1987, 305 in 1988, and 178 in 1989. Table 4 summarizes the type and number of counseling sessions that were held. TABLE 4 THERAPEUTIC SERVICES 1987 1988 1989 Individual Counseling 232 365 323 Group Counseling Total = 177 205 178 Process Group 75 64 48 Basic Skills Group 43 43 43 Substance Abuse Group 0 24 17 Parent Group 24 26 22 Community Meeting 35 48 48 Family Counseling 43 61 59 Recreation/Leisure Activities 301 280 308 4 It is to be noted that the word "formal" is used to denote prearranged and documented sessions. Numerous additional counseling sessions routinely occur that are informal and undoct.imented, unless significant material is revealed. 5 N7 During 1987, 301 recreational/leisure time activities were conducted, 208 occurred in 1988, and 308 in 1989. Youth Haven II operates an Aftercare Program that is designed to facilitate transition from the program to home. The Aftercare program is available only to program graduates and their families and consists of regular phone contacts and counseling sessions for up to three months after discharge. During 1987, Aftercare services were provided to the one graduate for a period of three months; this included 12 individual telephone contacts and 2. family counseling sessions. In 1988, 33~ of the graduates (N=6) utilized the Aftercare program. Contact was maintained for an average of 1.5 months and a total of 10 telephone contacts and four family sessions were held. Aftercare services were provided to 33~ of the graduates (N=3) in 1989; in a period of two months, 8 telephone contacts were made and one family session was held. OUTCOME DATA Successful completion of the program implies improved social functioning in the Youth Haven II graduate. Improved functioning is also objectively measured through the use of standardized testing. The Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale (designed to assess self-esteem and its components) and the Jesness Inventory (a measure of delinquency) are administered shortly after admission and, again, two weeks prior to discharge. 6 N-7 Official standardized testing was not completed for those resi- dents who graduated the program in 1987.5 Of those graduates served in 1988, only two completed pre and post-testing. One resident demonstrated a significant increase in self-esteem; her pre-test score fell in the 49th percentile and her post-test score fell in the 85th percentile, reflecting a 73~ increase in the self-esteem measure. No significant difference was reflected in the self-esteem scores for the second graduate. No significant changes were noted in the delinquency indices for either graduate.6 All graduates tested in 1989 (N=3) demonstrated dramatic increases in self-esteem scores; initial scores fell between the 10th and 20th percentile and final scores ranged between the 75th and 95th percentile, representing an average of 300 increase in self-esteem scores. Significant decreases in delinquency scores were also noted for all graduates; there was an average decrease of 32~ in delinquency scores for all graduates. Although non-graduates complete standardized testing in the initial days of placement, post-tests are rarely administered due to the unplanned nature of discretionary discharges. It is assumed, however, that non-graduates receive some benefit from simply being in the program for any given length of time. This assertion is quantified through the use of adjudicatory records; a non-graduate is thought to have demonstrated improved functioning if they have not been 5 Implementation of pre and post testing of the Piers- Harris Self-Concept Scale and the Jesness Inventory was official- ly begun by the Department of Corrections in July, 1987. 6 A significant increase or decrease in delinquency and self-esteem measures is defined as, at least, a 10~ change in the value of the score. 7 N7 adjudicated within one year of discharge from Youth Haven II. The adjudicatory data for non-graduates is presented in Table 5. TABLE 5 ADJUDICATORY STATUS (NON-GRADUATES) Year Not Served Adjudicated Adjudicated 1987 1 0 (n=1) (100) 0 1988 5 4 (n=9) (56~) (44~) 1989 8 7 (n=15) (53~) (47~) Total N=25 14 11 (56~) (44~) The data indicate that of the total of non-graduates served in the period between 1987 and 1989 (N=25), 44~ (n=11) were not adjudicated within one year of discharge. Adjudicatory data is also compiled for program graduates. Of the 10 residents successfully completing the program between 1987 and 1989, eight (80~) were not adjudicated within one year of graduation from Youth Haven II; the remaining two graduates were adjudicated for Grand Larceny. Table 6 summarizes the adjudicatory status data for program graduates. 8 . ~ _ ~~ TABLE 6 ADJUDICATORY STATUS (GRADUATES) Year Not Served Adjudicated Adjudicated 1987 (n=1) 0 1 (1000 1988 (n=6) 2 (33~) 4 (67~) 1989 (n=3) 0 3 (100%) Total N=10 2 (20%) 8 (80%) When examining where residents have been placed after discharge, we find that in 1987, all residents (N=2) were returned home. In 1988, 9 of 14 residents discharged (64%) remained with their families and 5 residents (36%) went on to other placements. Of those residents discharged in 1989 (N=18), 12 (67%) returned home; alternative living arrangements were secured for the remaining 6 (33%) residents. The types of post-discharge placements and the frequency distribution of residents entering such placements are summarized in Table 7. TABLE 7 POST DISCHARGE PLACEMENTS 1987 1988 1989 Home 2 (100%) 9 (64%) 12 (67%) Other placement 0 5 (36%) 6 (33%) Foster Care 0 1 (7%) 0 In-patient 0 0 1 (6%) DOC/DYES 0 1 (7%) 4 (22%) Long-ter.m residential 0 2 (14%) 1 (6%) Independent living 0 0 0 Other 0 1 (7%} 0 9 n-~ SUMMARY Youth Haven II came into existence in order to provide a community based residential treatment facility for adolescent females in the Roanoke Valley. The intent was to provide a structured therapeutic environment for youth, and adjunctive services to their families, in order to make possible the youth's return to her family. Treatment objectives were established concerning improved social functioning as a result of being in placement. It was proposed that at least 60~ of our program graduates would not be adjudicated within one year of gradua- tion. Additionally, 50~ of the graduates would exhibit improved social and personal adjustment, as documented by testing. In conclusion, it has been found that in addition to the provision of basic services, (e.g., food, shelter, medical, and dental care), extensive therapeutic services are provided by Youth Haven II, both during and after placement. The intensive nature of these services has made it possible for 67~ of all residents discharged (N=34) to return dome. When examining what happens to residents after they leave the program, we find that 80~ of all graduates are not adjudicated within one year of graduation and 44~ of all non-graduates were not adjudi- cated within one year of discharge. Standardized testing data reveals that 91~ of graduates tested demonstrated dramatic increases in self- esteem measures and 80~ of the graduates tested demonstrated significant decreases in the delinquency measure. Consideration of these data warrants the conclusion that Youth Haven II has clearly met and/or exceeded its programmatic goals and objectives. 10 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Report on the status of the proposed noise ordi- nance COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' On May 20, 1991 The City Council for the City of Roanoke adopted a "Noise Control" Ordinance. As a result of this action the Board of Supervisors directed the County Atorney to report to the Board on this ordinance after six months of its application. BACKGROUND' All parties realize the inadequacy of the County's existing ordinance to address the common types of noise nuisances that detract from the quality of life in an urban and suburban environ- ment. Over the past six years citizen complaints have increased as staff has researched various appoaches to resolve these problems. Practical problems of enforceability and definition (how loud is loud?) and constitutional concerns with First Amendment "free speech" considerations have raised significant legal hurdles to an effective local ordinance. These problems include the cost of equipment to measure the duration, intensity and frequency of sound. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This office is seeking the comments of Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney, and Donald C. Caldwell, Commonwealth's Attorney for Roanoke City, concerning the application and enforcement of the City's noise ordinance. I am in the process of contacting experts at Virginia Tech for their comments and assistance, as well as coordinating a draft ordinance through the County's Public Safety Team. I anticipate submitting a recommendation and a draft ordinance to the Board within the next 2 or 3 months. 1 lY-8 Respectfully submitted, ~-`'^~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to c:\wp51\agenda\code\noise.:pt Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 2 r ~ t ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER I Y " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority 1990/91 Audit COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the 1991 audit for the Industrial Development Authority. The audit was performed by Brown, Edwards and Company and has been sent to the State Auditor of Public Accounts. ~.. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers r { v ~ t ' I LAW' OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE ' d A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOU DT P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE MICHAEL S. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 703-774-1197 MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018 FAX NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703-774-0961 MARK D. KIDD November 3, 1991 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the audit for the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991. Copies have been provided to each member of the Authority and also to the appropriate state agencies as required by law. Should there be any questions concerning the audit or other activities of the Authority, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~Q ~~ ~ Edward A. Natt EAN/dle Enclosure c: Mr. Tim Gubala ~~~ I au .~r, ict ~ OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W CHARLES H. OSTERHOVDT P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON VIRGINIA ROANOKE 703-774-1197 EDWARD A. NATT , MICHAEL J. AHERON 24OI S FAx NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703.774-0961 MARK D. KIDD November 3, 1991 Auditor, Public Accounts Commonwealth of Virginia James Monroe Building 101 N. 14th Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Re: Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a financial report for the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia dated June 30, 1991. , , Should there be any questions, please advise. With best personal regards, I am, Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHEROPI & AGEE , P . C . Edward A. Natt EAN/dle Enclosure c: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ~.~ Ea1~r uY.Y~ N~~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA FINANCIAL REPORT June 30, 1991 ~tc~'`. - Er~uaEUr~ CLk1I#~Y n-ti OFFICERS Charles R. Saul, Chairman Tim Gubala, Secretary Edward A. Natt, Treasurer BOARD OF DIRECTORS Billy H. Branch Richard Cranwell Ron Martin J. Carson Quarles W. Darnell Vinyard Wayne Dunman U~~~ Eu~~a[ Ccx~~w /Y-~ C O N T E N T S Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance Sheets 5 Statements of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 6 Notes to Financial Statements 7 ~'"' D ^ haw D ^ C:o~Ar~ Certified Public Accountants Tennessee • Virginia • West Virginia INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Members of the Board of Supervisors and Board of Directors Industrial Development Authority Roanoke County, Virginia We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, as of June 30, 1991 and 1990, and the related statements of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, at June 30, 1991 and 1990, and the results of its operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ~ ~ L~ CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Roanoke, Virginia September 26, 1991 Member: SEC and Private Companies Practice Sections of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Associated Regional Accounting Firms - P~a~~ Er~~r~u~ : Ccx~mruvv N-9 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1991 and 1990 ASSETS Cash Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES Accounts payable Total liabilities FUND BALANCE Page S 1991 1990 S 4.519 S 4.425 S 4.519 S 4,425 S - S 500 - 500 4,519 3,925 S 4,519 S 4,425 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 13RCx~ - Et~~n[ur ~ CL~4~.titi' ~~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND ` CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Years Ended June 30, 1991 and 1990 Page 6 1991 1990 REVENUES Application fees Processing and closing fees Audit fees Total revenues EXPENDITURES Directors' fees Professional fees Total expenditures Excess of revenues over expenditures FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $ 250 $ 900 1,144 - 1,112 1,527 2.506 2.427 800 750 1,112 1,085 1.912 1,835 594 592 3.925 3.333 S 4.519 ~ 3,925 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. H~a~~ ._ : Cl~t~,`1~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1991 Page 7 Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies A. Purpose The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, was created by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County on August 11, 1971, pursuant to Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended (Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act). It is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Authority promotes industry and develops trade by encouraging manufacturing, industrial, governmental, and commercial enterprises to locate or remain in Roanoke County. The Authority issues low- interest, tax-free industrial revenue bonds to acquire and improve property and equipment which is then sold or leased to the enterprise at terms necessary to retire the financing. B. Basis of Accountine The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the Authority. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when received. Expenditures are recorded when the liability is incurred. C. Limitation of Liability The Authority has issued revenue bonds and notes to acquire and finance improvements of property and equipment which are immediately sold or leased. The notes and bonds, as to principal and interest, are payable solely from lease payments or payments on notes receivable. The long-term leases are essentially sales agreements as the lessees have a bargain purchase option to acquire the property at the expiration of the lease. The Authority does not reflect in its accounts any ownership in the properties. If the lessee or note makers default, the holders do not have recourse from the Authority but must obtain indemnity from the lessee, note maker or by sale of the property. Bonds and notes issued pursuant to the provisions of the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act are not deemed to constitute a debt of the Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof and are guaranteed by the Authority only to the extent of revenues and other security pledged under the terms of the individual agreements. However, the Authority and the County of Roanoke, Virginia, may choose at their option to assume responsibility for the debt issues in the event of default to preserve the credit rating of the Authority for future issues. Note 2. Revenue Bonds and Notes As of June 30, 1991, the Authority has issued and outstanding $37, 680, 770 of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds and Notes, pursuant to Chapter 33, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. These debt issues are not included in the accompanying financial statements since the Authority is not liable for their repayment, as discussed in Note 1. (Continued) - EU~:aan~S~ Ccx~ti~vt' JV-9 Page 8 Balance June 30. 1991 $ 341,702 834,378 393,486 99,639 109,266 129,236 3,312,326 1,665,000 505,000 3,320,000 395,000 8,510,000 400,000 388,204 308,274 297,000 65,665 1,718,800 7,881 166,326 259,163 95,237 138,652 965,188 760,000 356,591 1,198,454 3,870,000 433,877 427,235 691,190 708,000 3,000,000 1,450,000 360.000 Type of Project Truck Sales and Service Facilities Egg Production Facility Plant Facility Restaurant Medical Facilities Real Estate and Professional Hotel Hospital Center Manufacturing Plant Nursing Home Hospital Center Hospital and Residential Care Freight Terminals Restaurant Office Building Health Center Facility Manufacturing Facility Warehouse and Office Facility Office Building Office Building Office Building Feed Mill Office Building Office and Shopping Center Mini-Warehouse Facility Storage Building Medical Office Refunding 1982 Bond Office Building Office Building Egg Production Facility Office Building Gymnasium Office Facility Center Retail Shopping Center Facility Office Building ~ 37.680.770 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER (J ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session - Water Treatment Plant BACKGROUND: The Spring Hollow Water Project includes the construction of the Spring Hollow Reservoir, a Water Treatment Plant and water transmission lines. The Board of Supervisors have previously approved the concept plan for the reservoir and transmission lines. During this work session, staff will present alternative concept plans for the water treatment facilities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the Work Session, staff will discuss the water quality of the Roanoke River and how it relates to treatment processes. Staff will present three concept plans for a water treatment facility. The three alternatives are construction of a water treatment plant along Route 460, 2000 feet northwest of the reservoir; construction of a water treatment plant at Glenvar on the "Allied" site; and upgrade of the City of Salem Water Treatment Plant located in Glenvar. All three concepts will fully comply with the conditions of the permit issued to construct the Spring Hollow Reservoir as it related to use of water from the Roanoke River. A method for handling the design and construction of the water treatment plant will be discussed with the Board. Possible design methods available range from awarding a full design/construction management contract to one engineering firm, similar to the way Spring Hollow Reservoir was done, to design/construction management by County personnel similar to the way water and sewer projects have been done for the last four years. As a result of this Work Sessions., the Board will provide direction to staff for the concept and design of the water treatment facility. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ Cliffor ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator o-~ WORK SESSION WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER QUALITY The Virginia Water Control Board maintains a water quality monitoring station on the Roanoke River at the Lafayette Gauging Station. This station is just downstream of where the North and South Fork combine to from the Roanoke River. The results of the testing period ending May 31, 1991 are included in this report as Attachment #l. Due to the low number of parameters tested for by the Water Control Board, staff hired an independent testing laboratory to collect water samples and test for all contaminants listed in the Safe Drinking Water Act, all contaminants proposed for listing in the Safe Drinking Water Act, and all contaminants listed as Priority Pollutants by the USEPA. A total of 178 items were tested for. The results of these tests are included as Attachment #2. Samples were also collected and tested for total and fecal coliform. Nineteen samples have been collected since October 7 and sampled for coliform. Copies of the coliform tests are included as Attachment #3. The geometric mean of the nineteen daily samples taken is 440/100m1 total coliform and 135/100m1 fecal coliform. The section of the Roanoke River where the Spring Hollow Reservoir intake pump station is located is classified as a Natural Trout stream. The water quality required for classification as a Natural Trout stream is higher than the water quality that is maintained for a river section that has been classified as a Public Water Supply. The above information is provided to document the water that is proposed to be used as a raw water treatment plant. the high quality of water source for a November 14, 1991 t TREATMENT PLANT The water treatment plant that is proposed to provide treated water for Roanoke County will be selected to meet the following criteria: 1. Meet all requirements of the Surface Water Treatment Rule and the Virginia Waterworks Regulations. 2. Be capable of treating water to meet all existing MCL's as well as MCLG's for possible contaminants. 3. Construct at least cost to our residents and customers. 4. Treatment process that uses minimum possible energy. 5. Treatment process that uses minimum amount of chemicals and has minimum chemical carry over into finished water. 6. Treatment process using minimum moving parts in order to reduce energy requirements and maintenance. 7. Treatment process that produces minimum amount of sludge and wastewater. 8. Treatment process with minimum in-plant time to reduce by- product generation and minimize plant size. 9. Treatment process that can be easily expanded without interfering with existing plant operation. SITE SELECTION The cost to construct a water treatment plant is based on the quality of the raw water. Therefore, the cost to construct a treatment plant at differing locations will vary by the cost of land and site work. The cost of operating a treatment plant at differing locations increases as the plant elevation decreases. The construction and operating costs for a Salem, Glenvar or West options are presented in tabular form on the following pages. November 14, 1991 • COST COMPARISON FOR ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLANT SITES SALEM BENDIX WEST PLANT WATER SOURCE ELEVATION 1055' ~91' 1075' >125' 1150' >260' PLANT INLET ELEVATION 1146' 1200' 1410' PLANT FINISH WATER ELEVATION 1090' >410' 1144' '356' 1314' '186' TRANSMISSION STORAGE ELEVATION 1500 1500 1500 TOTAL STATIC HEAD -SOURCE/STORAGE 501' 481' 446' BASIC COST PER MILLION GALLON PUMPED $125.25 $120.25 $111.5 ~ ADD PER MILLION GALLON - DYNAMIC HEAD 5 MGD $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 10 MGD $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 15 MGD $12.75 $12.75 $12.75 25 MGD $33.25 $33.25 $33.25 USING THE ABOVE FINISH WATER COST AND ADDING RAW WATER PUMPING COST AND RIVER AUGMENTATION COST, THE ACTUAL TOTAL ANNUAL PUMPING COST FOR HISTORICAL RIVER FLOWS WOULD BE: SALEM BENDIX WEST AVERAGE RIVER FLOW - 10 MGD DEMAND $594,791 $561,124 $480,732 AVERAGE RIVER FLOW - 17 MGD DEMAND $975,665 $920,439 $806,088 30 YEAR LOW RIVER FLOW - 17 MGD DEMAND $986,762 $930,908 $794,595 ADDITIONAL COST FOR SITES: INLET PIPING PUMP BACK LINE RAW PUMP STATION PRE-SETTLEMENT BASIN OR ADDITIONAL PROCESS UNITS SECOND TRANSMISSION PUMP STATION LAN D $50,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $450,000 $450,000 $100,000 $440,000 $200,000 ~ $1,280,000 ~ TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $2,550,000 $2,940,000 $1,480,000 OKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ROAN NOV. 14, 19911 D O ~ z z ,~ O D ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~, Z ~ N~ ~ %` --~ ~, (n D l l ~ ~ ~ m rn C -I ~ ~° z ~ mpg ~ --~ N Z ~~ m ~ C ~ <_ -~ (T1 °- ° r D ~ t fTl ~ ~ o ~ I 1 ~ ,~ ~ -o ~ N ~ D D ~ rn ~ m ~ z ~ RIVER z c~ -~ _~ Nla i~ynQW ~u~d ~ m D ~ ~< T`~ m~ I~ o ^ ° v a ° ~ 0 Dn ~n Cn 0 D ~ ~ a? N rn ~ ~ o ~ O z D z D O ~ fTl ~ m ~ 2 ~ ~ O o ~, ~ C ~ m f Tl Z -~ ~J ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~7 C fTl ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ m fTl z z ~ o s ~ D ~ z --~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 ~ z o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ r-J, N J -~ O N ~ Z D ~ ~~ < ~ ~ ~ m -~ cp o c1i ~ ~ ~ ATTACHMENT N0. 1 May 13, 1991 Lafayette Gauging Station VaWCB NO 2 as N Total 0.010 mg/1 Un-ioned NH, as NH, 0.001 mg/1 NO 3 as N Total 0.457 mg/1 Total KJEL as N 0.313 mg/1 Phos-Total as P 0.146 mg/1 Phos-Dis Ortho as P 0.048 mg/1 Total Organic as C 2.000 mg/1 Total Hardness as C~CO, 155.290 mg/1 Chloride Total 19.046 mg/1 Fluoride as F Total 0.139 mg/1 Silica Dissolved 8.464 mg/1 Arsenic Total As 10.000 ug/1 Cadmium Total CD 13.750 ug/1 Chromium Total CR 10.000 ug/1 Copper Total CU 10.000 ug/1 Iron Total FE 135.000 ug/1 Lead Total PB 10.000 ug/1 Manganese MN 8.666 ug/1 Nickel Total NI 10.000 ug/1 Zinc Total Zinc 9.25 ug/1 Mercury Total HG 0.300 ug/1 ATTACHMENT N0. 2 FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. LABORA?ORV DiR Er?OR P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, YIR(iINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814) 333-1468 FAX: (703) 382-1883 KENNETH G. HART LA80RA?ORV DIREC?GR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 11/01/91 TO: RtOANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATTN: MR. SCOTP AGNF~t 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SAL,Eri VA 29153 AOOOLIN'P N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PACE 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RDGEIVID: 08/28/91 ---------------------------------------------------- pp'gt RESULTS UNITS Cyanide (distillation) <0.005 MG/L Fluoride (distilled) ~' Nitrogen, Nitrate Nitrogen, Nitrite Sulfate Asbestos (by TEM) ° Asbestos (by TEM) ° Arsenic (flameless) Mercury Selenium (flameless) Radium 226 Radium 228 0.4 0.28 <0.05 30 0 0 <0.0005 <0.0001 <0.0005 <0.5 3+/-1 MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MSL NG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L pCi/L * This analysis was performed by CEP, Inc., I.D. #N!s-CEP-AN-13. ° This analysis was performed by Structure Probe, NVLAP 1780. --------------------------- DATE AND ANALYST 09/04/91 HEID/ WALTERS 09/11/91 PEARSUN 08/29/91 HANAUII2 08/29/91 HANAUER 09/03/91 LESSICK 09/10/91 09/06/91 09/05/91 10/10/91 KOZAKOVSKY KOZAKOVSKY PEPHTEL ~ Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 U_ ~blic Heath Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dept. of Apricuture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ,~.~r,,,,,i Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ', - - - J FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC. 7 ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. LABORATORY DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIR(i1N1A 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 2dS-2544 KENNETH G. HART LABORATORY DIRECTOR FAX: (814) 333-1486 FAX: (703) 362-1683 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 11/01/91 ~: ROANOICE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATTN: MR. SCOTT AQ1ER 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. gAjp4 VA 24153 AOOOUNT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL ----- REPORT FORM ----------------- PAIGE 2 ------------ ------------------ ----------------------------- SAMPLE ID --------- RQANOKE RIVIIt 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RF7CEIVID: 08/28/91 -- ----------------- ------------ ----------------- ------------------------------ pAgp~~ ------------ RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST Uranitan * <0.001 MG/L 10/10/91 Radon * 12+/-8 pCi/L 10/10/91 Dibromomethane <0.005 MG/L 09/03/91 BEERS 2,6-Dichlorophenol <0.010 MG/L 09/10/91 HANS/ BOLARD Dioxin SEE NOTE 09/10/91 HAMS/ BOLARD Acid Digestion Preparation ODI~~LETE 09/03/91 9CHMiITT 2,4-D <0.00005 MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) <0.00005 MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH * This analysis was performed by CEP, Inc., I.D. #NM-CEP-AN-13. MOTE: The compound Dioxin, (2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) was not found in the sample based on GC/MS screen according to Method 625. >. Atxreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Heath Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 ublic Hsalth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Heath 6 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA O.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Apricuture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Heath Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~.~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. L ABORATQRV DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRQINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 KENNETH G. HART LABORA T09v DIRECTOR FAX: (814) 333-1488 FAX: (703) 382-1883 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 11/01/91 ~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATTN: MR. SOOTP AGNER 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 AOOOUNT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RECEIVID: 08/28/91 ---------------------------------------------------- pp~Z~ RESULTS UNITS BERBICIDES 5 INSECTICIDES Ala or <0.0002 MG/L Atrazine <0.0005 Butachlor <0.0001 Dalapon <0.00005 Dinoseb <0.00003 Diquat <0.001 Endothall <0.03 Glyphosate <1.0 Metribuzin <0.00002 Pichloram <0.00005 Propachlor <0.00006 Simazine <0.001 Metolafhlor <0.0002 * This analysis was performed by Aqua Tech, I.D. #34-126-4065. DATE AND ANALYST 10/15/91 Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42'70)0 PA O.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dept. of Apricufture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ;°~',..:: Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.t.=WILL FOLLOW _ _ _ FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O.80X 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIR(iiNIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814) 333-1488 FAX: (703) 382-1883 11/01/91 ~: RQA[VOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATTN : MR . SCOTT AIQ~~t 1206 KFSSLIIt MILL RD. ~,~ VA 24153 A(JOOUNT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM SAMPLE ID RaANO~c>; RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DIATE RDC~IVED: 08/28/91 p~ RESULTS UNITS INSECTICIDES 6 HERBICIDES 05 MG/L <0 apt a . Aldicarb <0.05 Aldicarb Sulfone <0.05 Aldicarb Sulfoxide <0.05 Carbaryl <0.05 Carbofuran <0.05 Di (2-ethylhexyl) ~ipate <0.002 Epichlorohydrin <0.002 Methamyl <0.05 Vydate <0.05 3-Hydroxycarbofuran <0.05 * This analysis was performed by Aqua Tech, I.D. #34-126-4065. PAGE 4 J. RICHARD WONIER, Ph.D. LABORATORY DIRECTOR MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART LABORATORY DIRECTOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA L1ATE AMID ANALYST 10/15/91 A. Axreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 ~, 'ubllc Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Hsafth Laboratory LD. No. 10552 7!`"lLu~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 7023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < -LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ~tl FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883 11/01/91 TO: ROIANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNER 1206 KFSSLER MILL RD. SALE]~i VA 24153 P.O. M AOGOUIPP N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVF~2 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE REX;EIVED: 08/28/91 ----------------------------------------------------------- pAgp~~~ RESiJLTS UNITS UNRDGIJLATID VOC Ethylene Dibramide <0.00002 MG/L 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.00002 PAGE 5 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. _aPpaar~r~-~ "'OR MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART ~_necaa-_•~~~ o,FecToa ROANOKE. VIRGINIA DATE AND ANALYST 09/04/91 LEMISH ~' .Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 l1. ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboretory 1.0. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection lab I.D. No. '7613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. Of Health Laboretory LD. No. 10552 •'°" Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ._ FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 16335 ROANOKE, VIR(31NIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1486 FAX: (703)362-1883 11/01/91 ~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATPN: MR. SCOTT A~ 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SAI,Eht VA 24153 AIOOOUNT NO. 01925 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM P1~GE 6 --------------------------------- SAMPLE ID LAB ID DATE RDL~IVID: ---------------------------------- PA~RAMEZTR SEMI-VOLATILE B Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl Alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 4-Methylphenol N-Nitrosodi-N-propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol Benzoic Acid bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene ---------------- ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 10828704 08/28/91 RESULTS UNITS <0.002 <0.005 <0.002 <0.005 <0.005 <0.010 <0.005 <0.005 <0.002 <0.005 <0.010 <0.010 <0.005 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.050 <0.002 <0.002 <0.005 <0.002 <0.010 <0.010 MG/L J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. '_APORn?ORV DiREC?OR MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART ..~BOR4'ORV OiR EC70R ROANOKE. VIRGINIA DAATE AND ANALYST 09/10/91 HAMS/ BOLARD `! A. Accreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 `~ ?ublic Hsatth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health b Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Em. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1486 FAX: (703)382-1863 11/01/91 ~: F~OIANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. Y ATTN : MR . SCOTT A(~t 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SAT,,~i VA 24153 ACOOUNT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LAB ID DATE RDCEIVID: --------------------------------- PARAME'PER SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 10828704 08/28/91 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART _ABORATORV DIRECTOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DATE AND ANALYST SEMI-VOLATILE COMPWNDS Continued 9-Chloro-3-methylphenol tpara-chlor 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene r 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2-(~loronaphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl Phthalate Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 9,6-Dintro-2-methylphenol N-n i trostxl i phenylalni ne 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl ether Hexachlorobenzene RESULTS UNITS <0.002 <0.010 <0.010 <0.002 <0.010 <0.002 <0.050 <O.OOZ <0.002 <0.050 <0.002 <0.030 <0.030 <0.010 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.002 <0.002 MG/L 09/10/91 HAMS/ BOLARD .Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 l~ ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Labwratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboretory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Faality NV Oept. of Heakh Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~^°~^~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC. J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. 7 LABORA70RV ~iRECTOR P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (7'03) 265-2544 KENNETH G. HART ~_ABORArORV CiR EC7CR FAX: (814) 333-1466 FAX: (703) 382-1883 p0AN0KE, VIRGINIA 11/01/91 ~~ RQANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~ ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGiVII2 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 AQOOIJMP N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 8 ------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RECEIVED: 08/28/91 PARAMETER RESULTS SEMI-VOLATILE ~OLMDS Continued Pentachlorophenol <0.010 Phenanthrene <0.002 Anthracene <0.002 Di-n-butylphthalate <0.002 Fluoranthene <0.002 Pyrene <0.002 Butyl Benzyl Phthalate <0.002 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine <0.010 Benzo(a)anthracene <0.002 bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate <0.002 Chrysene <0.002 Di-n-octyl Phthalate <0.002 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.002 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.002 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.002 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.002 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.005 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.002 UNITS DATE AND ANALYST MG/L 09/10/91 HAMS/ BOLARD A. Accrodttation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 ~~, _ rubliC Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dept. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~yc Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ~ I FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (T03) 285-2544 ~ FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883 m 11/01/91 ~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DBPT P.O. ~ ATTN: MR. SCOTT AC1dER 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 ACCaMT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PACE 9 SAI~LE ID LAB ID DATE RDC~IVID: --------------- PARAME~'ER WLATILE CX~POUNDS Chloromethane Bromocnnethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride Acetone Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethenes tTotal) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,2-Dichloropzopane trans-l,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane RoANOxE RIVER 08/28/91 10828704 08/28/91 ---------------- RFSULTS UNITS <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.005 <0.10 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.10 <0.005 <0.005 <0.050 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 MG/L J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. ~ABOAn'~ar c~a E_r~a MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART neoaaroav o~aECToa ROANOKE. VIRGINIA DATE AND ANALYST 09/03/91 BEERS A. Axreditatfon No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 '<. 'ublic Hsalth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA O.E.R. Laborarory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NV Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 '-'y.w; Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f =WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883 11/01/91 ~~ ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT ATTN: MR. SCOTT AIQ~t 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALDri VA P.O. M 24153 AOOOUN'P N0. 01925 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 10 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. LABORATORY DIREC?OR MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART '~ABORATORv DIRECTOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SAMPLE ID RI'JAPIOKE RIVER 08/28/91 - LAB ID 10828704 DATE REiL'EIVID: 08/28/91 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pp,~~TER RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST VOLATILE OOMPOUNDS Continued Benzene <0.005 MG/L 09/03/91 BEERS cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.005 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether <0.010 Bromoforn- <0.005 2-Hexanone <0.050 4-Methyl-2-pentanone <0.050 Tetrachloroethene <0.005 Toluene <0.005 Chlorobenzene <0.005 Ethylbenzene <0.005 Styrene <0.005 Total Xylenes <0.005 4. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Heefth Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 Ie_ ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. LD. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboretory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Heahh Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 N"?v~ Natl. Voluntary lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < -LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (703) 265-2544 FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)362-1663 11/01/91 TO: ROAAIOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT ATTN : MR . SCOTT AIGt~~t 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. ~,~ VA 24153 PARAMETER PESTICIDES ~ PCB'S Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC Chlordane 4,4'-DDT 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDD Dieldrin alpha-Endosulfan beta-Et~dosulfan Endosulfan Sulfate Endrin IIzdrin Aldehyde Heptachlor Epoxide Heptachlor Methoxychlor Toxaphene PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCS-1248 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0004 <0.0001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH 4. Accreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 ,~. 'ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dept. of Agriculture Approved Oairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 =`•'~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface MiNng Approved Facility NY Dept. o} Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.t. =WILL FOLLOW P.O. IR AOCOL)NT N0. 01425 J. RICHARD WOHLER,Ph.D. _ABORA'nav GiR~C'OR MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART ~ABORATOR~ DiR _C-OR ROANOKE. VIRGINIA ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE it SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE R~CEIVID: 08/28/91 RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST FREE•COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883 11/01/91 ~~ ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT ATTN: I4Et. SCO`1T AGNER 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. ~,~•~ VA 24153 P.O. ~ ACOOiJDTP N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM SAt~LE ID RQANOKE RiVFR 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RDGEIVED: 08/28/91 ----------------------------------------------------------- pT~g RESULTS UNITS PESTICIDES ~ PCB'S CONTINOED PCB-12 4 <0.001 MG/L PCB-1260 <0.001 PAIGE 12 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. _ABORA70RV DiREC70R MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART ~ABORA70RV DtREC70R ROANOKE. VIRGINIA --------------------------- DATE AND ANALYST 09/09/91 LEMISH i A. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 rublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of ApricuRure Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Hsekh Laboretory LD. No. 10552 ~''lu1;o' Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Em. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: <=LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW I FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC. J. RICHARD WOHLER,Ph.D. s _aeaan ri: Av ~„aec-o5 P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE.. PENNSYLVANIA MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 KENNETH G. HART FAX: (814) 333-1486 FAX: (703) 382-1883 ROANOKE VIRGINIA 11/01!91 Tn: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT ATTN : MR . SCOTT' A~ 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 P.O. ~ ACCOUNT N0. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVFR DIGESTION LAB ID 10828705 DATE RECEIVID: ------- 08/28/91 ----------- ------------- ---------------------------- pA,Rp,METER RESULTS UNITS Altanintan (flameless) 0.214 S MG/L Antimony (flameless) <0.010 MG/L Barium (flameless) 0.070 S MG/L Beryllium <0.03 MG/L Cadmiiali <0.01 MG/L Chromium (flameless) 0.001 MG/L Copper <0.02 MG/L Lead (flameless) 0.002 S MG/L Molybdenum <0.1 MG/L Nickel <0.04 MG/L PAGE 13 ---------------------------- ---------------------- DATE AND ANALYST 11/01/91 BAKER 09/11/91 BAKER/ WESTON 10/31/91 BAKER 09/09/91 PRUTZMAN 09/04/91 LIM 10/28/91 BAKER 09/04/91 LIM 10/24/91 BAKER/ 09/04/91 LIM 09/04/91 LIM / 1. Axredltation No. 913 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 C.. ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory t.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env.. Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Faality NY Dept. o} Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ,^`=:,u~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)362-1863 11/01/91 ~~ F'OANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. M ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNER 1206 KESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 AG'COUNT N0. 01425 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. '_ABORATORY D~REC?OR MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART J+BORATORV D~REC?OR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM ------------------------------- PAGE 14 ---------------------- ------------------ ----------- SAMPLE ID ROANOKE RIVER DIGESTION LAB ID 10828705 DATE RDCEIVID: 08/28/91 ---- -- ------ --------------- ---------------------- ------------------- PAFiAMETER~I' ------------- - - RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST Silver (flameless) <0.0002 MG/L 10/23/91 BAKER/ Soditen 5.62 MG/L 09/04/91 pETH'I'II, Thallitnn 0.1 MG/L 09/06/91 PRUTZMAN Vanadiian <0.05 MG/L 09/05/91 PFtLfl'ZMAN Zinc 0.020 MG/L 09/04/91 LIM 4. Axreditatlon No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Neturel Resources Cert. No. 236 ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health b Nat. Res. I.D. No. 4270)0 PA U.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility NY Dspt. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012 PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 265.2544 FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)382-1863 11/01/91 TO: ROANORE CO. DTILITY DEPT P.O. # ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNBR 1206 RESSLER MILL RD. SALEM VA 24153 ACCOIINT NO. 01425 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SAMPLE ID ROANORE RIVER 08/28/91 LAB ID 10828704 DATE RECEIVED: 08/28/91 J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D. _AEORtiroa~ ~~q_~-. MEAOVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH G. HART _aB9pATnpr DiaEGT'A ROANOKE. VIRGINIA PARAMETER RESIILTS IINITS DATE AND ANALYST TRI FORMATION POTENTIAL Chloroform 0.067 MG/L 09/16/91 BCRLUND Dichlorobromomethane 0.010 MG/L Dibromochloromethane <0.002 MG/L Bromoform <0.002 MG/L Free Chlorine concentration at the end of the reaction period: 1.8 !!G/L Trihalomethane Formation Potential (TPF) = 0.62 uFi/L as Chloroform ttM/L =micro moles per liter This complete report is fifteen pages. ~..~ .~ A. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236 rublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700 PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Oept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004 PA Dspt. of Apricufture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 =~"~„ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility KEY: <=LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW `=. _ ~\ w ~: FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. s00( 667.COT70N ROAD 515 AIfpOR'f ROiAD YEADVILLE, P!?M1~YLYAI~NA 1x135 NOiANOKE. VIRONA?+~W12 PHONE (h4) Tt4-~42 PMOI~IE: (70x) 316.2544 FAX: (t14) 333.14A6 FAX: (703) 3f33.1te3 ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM CODE B: CODE D: CODE R: ~ CODE S: CODE NA: CODE ND: VOID: J. itlCllAtiO YYOHLER, faA.D. ueoiu~oav oe~c+ou A blank value over the detection limit of the test vas subtracted from this result. Detection limit change due to a dilution. The percent recovery on the spiked sample associated vith this sample vas not vithin the acceptance limits of 75~ - 125! This result ras obtained by Method of Standard l~dditions. Not lpplicable Not Detectable The sample plus spike concentration exceeded the linear range of the standazd curve. CODE Q: Values for parameters quantified in this sample have been adiusted foz recoveries of the analytical matzix spike. The adiustnents have been based on the matrix recoveries from this sample or the recoveries from a sample at the same site. ~diusted values are not given vhere sample values vere less than the detection limit or vhere spike recoveries are equal to 100$ r A. Accreellatton No. ae ;~ wbNe Hwth servfas Appwad F~dlily PA aE.R. Laborabry I.a Na 20073 PA Dept. of Apriarlture Approved Delry Laboreary NY Dept. a Heallh tab«eay l.a Na to6a2 NY Dept. or Env. Coraervetion Approve Facility MD oapt. a Health drt. No. 130 w- Dept. of Hearth Laboratory LD. No. 00115 wv Dapt. d Health Certification No. 21-R t+u Dept. d Env. Protection Lab I.a Na 77813 o~6f-f~ Natl. ~AOluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. ,029 Nc Dept. a R..ow~.e c.n. Na 236 rrc o.pL a Env., HeaNh a Net Rea l.a Na 12~oc sc o•a. a HwMh Laborewry i.D. No. esoo. Ml D•w. a Punic Health Approvd Faciiit)r U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility KEY: < -LESS THAN > .GREATER THAN w.f. ~ WILL FOLLOW METHODS PARAMETER METHOD SOURCE Arsenic (flameless) 206.3 1 Mercury 245.1 1 Selenium (flameless) 270.3 1 Cyanide (distillation) 335.2 1 Fluoride 340.1 1 Nitrogen, Nitrate 353.2 1 Nitrogen, Nitrite 353.2 1 Sulfate 375.4 1 Radon 903.1 17 Radium 226 903.0 17 Radium 228 904.0 17 Asbestos TEM Uranium E-U-O1 ** Acid Digestion Preparation Metals Intro. 1 Sect. 4.1.3 Semi-Volatile Compounds 625 5 Volatile Compounds 624 5 Herbicides 8150 2 Pesticides 608 5 PCB's 608 5 Glyphosate 547 U.S. EPA Draft Method Diquat 549 U.S. EPA Draft Method Alachlor 608 5 Atrazine 6pg 5 Butachlor 6pg 5 Dalapon .. 608 5 (' Dinoseb 608 5 Endothall 608 5 Metribuzan 608 5 Pichloram 608 5 Propachlor 608 5 Simazine 608 5 Metolachlor 608 5 Acrylamide 8240 2 Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 525 EPA/600/4-88/039 Aldicarb 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Aldicarb Sulfone 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Carbaryl 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Aldicarb Sulfoxide 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039 r Carbofuran 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Methomyl 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Vydate 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039 Epichlorohydrin 608 5 Antimony (flameless) 204.2 1 Barium 200.7 1 Beryllium 200.7 1 Cadmium 213.1 1 Chromium 218.1 1 Copper 220.1 1 Lead 239.1 1 t~ Nickel 249.1 1 ~_ f Thallium VOC Compounds Trihalomethanes Dioxin Aluminum Molybdenum Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc 279.1 1 504 g 5710B 16 625 5 202.1 1 246.1 1 272.1 1 273.1 1 200.7 1 289.1 1 SOURCE 1 - "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water & Wastes", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-79-020. Revised 1983. 2 - "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-84b, 2nd Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April, 1984. 5 - "Part VIII Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 136, Guidelines for Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Final Rule and Interim Final Rule and Proposed", Federal Register, Oct. 1984. 6 - "The analysis of Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water by Liquid/ Liquid Extraction", USEPA, EMSL, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8 - "1,2-Dibromoethane (EDR) and 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DROP) in water by Microextraction and Gas Chromatography", Method 504 (1985, Edition Revised 1986. 16 - "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 17th Edition. 17 - "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 15th Edition. '~ Anderson, C.H. and Long, J.M. 1980 Interim Method for Determining Asbestos In Water, Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and T1evelopment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia 30605, EPA-600/4-80-005, pp. 1-34. '~~ EML Procedures Manual HASL 300 ATTACHMENT N0. 3 Date 07-Oct-91 15-Oct-91 21-Oct-91 22-Oct-91 23-Oct-91 24-Oct-91 25-Oct-91 28-Oct-91 29-Oct-91 30-Oct-91 31-Oct-91 01-Nov-91 04-Nov-91 05-Nov-91 06-Nov-91 07-Nov-91 08-Nov-91 12-Nov-91 13-Nov-91 Roanoke River Bacteria MPN/100ML TOTAL FECAL daily geo mean daily geo mean 900 130 500 170 170 500 1600 500 900 900 500 240 900 130 170 300 170 1600 1600 472 474 448 473 431 405 398 378 410 440 80 50 300 80 110 500 30 240 900 100 50 34 220 30 110 130 70 1600 500 142 129 116 122 110 110 111 108 126 135 • ~ ~ ~ C a ~ • 1921 Salem Avenue. S. VU. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (7031 343-3618 Fax i i 03) 342-2054 Client: Roanoke River c/o RCUD 1208 Ressler Mill Road- Salem VA 24153 ~~W~~~D~L~~tS Date: October 11, 1991 Sample Code - A5461 Submitted By: Same. Date Collected: 10/07/91 Date Submitted: 10/07/91 Analysis Date 10/07/91 Report Date 10/11/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 900 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 80 MPN ~ index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN ~~ cn =© v -< o ~ ~~ f ~~ ~ ~a ~~ o '~~ -~ w "~' Remarks: ~% ! aboratory Director • ~Qf ~1 ~~~ df~11 1921 Salem Avenue. ~ '~'J • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-361 ~ r=ax (?03) 342-2054 ' Client: Roanoke River c/o RCUD 1206 Ressler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 ~~~~~~o~a~~ oc~ ~~a~~~o~ Date: October 17, 1991 Sample Code - A5598 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/15/91 Date Submitted: 10/15/81 Analysis Date 10/15/81 Report Date 10/1?/82 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 130 MPN index/100m1 SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 50 MPN index/100m1 SM 9221 C Tech - PBN rv -~' ~ -- r-- o C --i D ~ ~o a ~ ~ ~~ _ •v ~ ~ ~C -i ~ rn --t tD ~ ~ J Remarks: u~'~l ;oratory Direotor ~ ~, • - ~~~ C f ~ ~f~11~ f 1921 Saiem Aver,~e. S VV. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (703} 343-36" 8 Fax (703) 342-2054 ~~~' Roanoke River eJo Rt:UD 1206 Ressler Mi11 Road Sale~a VA 24153: ~~~~~ r~O~Q~~ Date: October 24, 1991 Sample Code - A5681 Submitted By:"Same Date Collected: 1Ol21J91 Date Submitted: lfl/21l9~., Analysis Date 10121,91 Report Date 1C~/24I93. Location: Roanoke River.- Rsw -__ Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 500 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221E Tech -PBN Fecal Coliform 300 MPN ~., index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech -PBN ~~ ~' o ~~ p ~ O O~ f"n ~ ~ n W "'~ y ~~ C'R •G A A_ V~ •-- . Remarks: ~„ LaboratorX Director • C r ~ ~~'~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S W. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (7031 3~+~-3618 i=ax (7031 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility mgt, 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem dA 24153 lf'11~~ ~~n~M(r-~~~ ~~ L~1UVl; ~1t~ tl ~~~ Date: October 28, 1991 Sample Code - A5?12 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/22/91 Date Sub~titted: 14/22/91 Analysis Date : 10/22/91 Report Date 10/28/91 Location: Roanoke River -.Raw Code Parameter --- ------------------ Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Result Method Notes ------------- ---------- --------------- 170 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN 80 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: Laboratory Director ~._. • ~~ C • d~n~~ r 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703} 343-3618 Fax {i03) 342-2054 ~Ciien#: Roanoke County Utility ]'apt. 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 ~~~~(~~D~Q~~ Date: October 28, 1991 Sample Code - A5746 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/23/91 Date Submitted: 10/23/91 Analysis Date 10/23/91 Report Date 10/28/91 Location: Roanoke River -Raw Code Parameter --- ------------------ Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Result Method Notes ------------- ---------- --------------- 170 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN 110 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: v~ y -L--- ~ahorafory Dir~eCtor ~ • ,-, ~~~ C I~~f d/~1 1921 Salem Aver~:.~. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone t703~ 3~~-3~~8 fax (7031 342-2054 Ctient: Roanoke County Ut i 1 ity Dept . ~~ 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 ~LS~~~~~~~Q~~ Date: October 30, 1991 Sample Gode - A5766 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/24/91 Date Submitted: 10/24/91 Analysis Date 10/24/91 Report Date 10/30/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 500 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 500 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: ~~ ..t~ l .QY~~n/~I~Jr ~. • ~, `~ ~ ~ C • ~nn~~ r 1921 Salem Avenue. S. ~N. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703: 2~3-36, 8 Fax. 1703) 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Ressler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 , ~~~~~~~~Q~~ Date: October 30, 1991 Sample Code - A5782 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/25/91 Date Submitted: 30/25/91 Analysis Date 10/25/91 Report Date 10/30/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 1600 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 30 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: ~~ ~ ~• /~ ~a~or~crv, DireCto~ • _ O ~ ~~ C • ~~' 1921 Salem Avenue. S. ~v. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone {703) 3~3-3616 Fax (703j 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Ressler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 L5 W~~ ~~Dn~MLr,~~~ ~~ 1;,~LI~JL,=~L~ It ~0~ Date: November 1, 1991 --_ Sample Code - A5801 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/28/91 Date Submitted: 10/28/91 Analysis Date 10/28/91 Report Date 11/01/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Farameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 500 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 240 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: < ~~ - -- _ ~__j:~ora?ory Direr' ~. _ _._ • .-~ ~ ~ ~ C • F ~~'~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S. b'V. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax ~703j 342-2054 ' Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Kessler Mill Road. Salem VA 24153 lf'/tl~~n~n /~~~n~MG=~~~ ~~ G=ti1LIVL~I~If ~~~ Date: November 4, 1991 Sample Code - A5810 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 10/29/91 Date Submitted: 10/29/91 Analysis Date 10/29/91 Report Date 11/04/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter --- ------------------ Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Result Method Notes ------------- ---------- --------------- 900 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN 900 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: ~~ - ! ~uoratory Diret;t~~~~ ~~ Wetar ~Chami~lry 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone {703? 343-3618 l=ax (703) 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Ressler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 Date: November 5, 1991 Sample Code - A5836 Date Collected: 10/30/91 Analysis Date 10/30/91 Location: Roanoke River Submitted By: Same Date Submitted: 10/30/91 Report Date 11/05/91 Code Parameter Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Result 900 MPN index/100 ml 110 MPN index/100 ml Method Notes ---------- --------------- SM 9221 B Tech - PBN SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: w~ ,....~ ~; Wetar ~Chamirt~y 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone f 7031 343-3618 Fa:x i X03 i 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 ~'~~~ ~~~n~MQ~~ Q~ L=~UVG=~L~ tf ~~~ Date: November 5, 1991 Sample Code - A5857 Date Collected: 10/31/91 Analysis Date 10/31/91 Location: Roanoke River Submitted By: Same Date Submitted: 10/31/91 Report Date 11/05/91 Code Parameter --- ------------------ Total Coliform Fecal Coliform a Result 500 MPN index/100 ml 50 MPN index/100 ml Method Notes ---------- --------------- SM 9221 B Tech - PBN SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: ~!~'/ =, , -~.~ _ ~ac~~ratorv D~r~=: • • ~r~~~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. L'A 24016 Phone ( ~ 03) 343-36 i 8 Fax ~ ~03f 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Ressler Mill Road Salem VA 24153 ~~~~~~[~D~Q~C~ Oo G Q~aC~~~O~ Date: November 5, 1991 Sample Code - A5883 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 11/01/91 Date Submitted: 11/01/91 Analysis Date 11/01/91 Report Date 11/05/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 240 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 34 MPN ( index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: . ~~'~C/ _ ~,,,~ • ~~~ ~ ~~ C • dm~~ r 1921 Salem Avenue, S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703) 342-2054 Client: 1~~~bo~es=~~it~illil~oa~ Dept. Sales VA 24153 ~C~~~Of~~~,° `1~C Date: Novesber 8. 1991 Sample Code - A5887 Subsitted 8y: Same Date Collected: ii/@4/91 Bate Subsitted: 11/84/91 Analysis Date a 11/04191 Report Date ~ 11/A8/91 Location: Roanoka River - Raw Code Paraaeter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Colifora 900 MPN index/100 al SM 9221 8 Tech - PBN Fecal Colifora 220 MPN index/100 al SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: ~~ _.._ _ .. , _ _ _ t ;~ • r ~ ~ ~~ C • df~11~ f 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (7031 342-2054 Client: 1~~5~~es~lert~il~iRoaa Dept. Salem VA 24153 CSC G°~~~f~~C~Q~C Date: November 11, 1991 Sample Code - A5903 Subvitted By: 3a~e Date Collected: 11/A5/91 Date Suboitted~ ii/A5/9i Analysis Date ~ 11/85/91 Report Date : ii/11!91 Location: Roanoke Aiver -Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 130 MPN index/100 ml SN 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 30 HPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: .. ~~%'~ ~. , : ---„ • C%~ ~ C ~ dr dm~~ ~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703? 343-3618 Fax (703; 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept, 1206 Ressler Mill Road Sales VA 24153 ~~~~o~o~a~~ Date: November il. 1991 Sasple Code - A5924 Submitted By: Sass Date Collected: 11/06/91 Date 3ubsitted: 11/06/91 Analysis Date ~ 11/06/91 Report Date ~ 11/11/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raw Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 170 NPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 110 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: '~ . - ~..,. ~<t„r, ~~ • ~ O ~ ~~ C • ~~'~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (7031 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Kessler Mill Road Sale^ VA 24155 ~~W~U-'t1~Qt1 LS Date: Noveaber 11. 1991 Sasple Code - A5952 ~#ubaitted By: Sase Date Collected: 11/07/91 Date Su6aitted: 1~l07/91 Analysis Date : 11/07/91 R4port Date , 11111/91 Location: Roanoke River - Raft Code Parameter Result Hethod Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform 300 HPN index/100 ml 3H 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 130 HPN index/100 ml SH 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: -- ~.', ~~ ~ ... "'~ ~,~ i . ~ ~ ~a r i • O ~ ~ C • ~~' 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703) 342-2054 ei Roanoke County Utility Dapt.- -1206 Hessler Mill Road Sales ` VA 24153 J ~~~~~~~~Q~~ r~ Q~~° ~~~~~ Date: November 11, 1991 Saaple Code - A5972 Sub'itted By: 8aae Date Collected 11/0.8/91 lpate Sub~itted~ 11/08/91 Analysis Date : 1i/98/91 ~-~teport Date' _: 11/li/91 Location: Roanoke River - Adx ` ~:: Code Parameter Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Result 170 HPN index/100 ml 70 MPN index/100 ml Hethod Notes ---------- --------------- SM 9221 B Tech - PBN SM 9221 C Tech - PBN ..Remarks: fi By .w., Laboratory Director ~_ • ... • ~~' 1921 Salem Avenue, S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703j 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 1206 Ressler Mill Road 3ale^ VA 24153 CSC F~~~[~~C~Q~C~ Date: November 15, 1991 Saaple Code - A5998 Submitted By: Same Date Collected: 11/12/91 Date Submitted: 11!12/91 Analysis Date : 11/12/91 Report Date : 11115!91 Location: Roanoke River - RaW Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform >1600 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform >1600 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: . /~~~ ~~- L~ V __~:~,~.~~~~~._:~~,~ Director • C. ~ ~ ~ C • ~~'~ 1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016 Phone (703) 343-3618 Pax (703) 342-2054 Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept. 12t~b Kessler Mill Road Sala^ YA 24153 ~~W/~~~~nlr~"~n~Mli ti1~~ Date: November 18. 1991 Sasple Code - A6013 Su ^itte y: Same Date Coilecteda 11/13/91 Date Subsitted: 11!13/91 Analysis Date : 11/13!91 Report Date : 11/18/91 Location, Roanoke Riger - Rav Code Parameter Result Method Notes --- ------------------ ------------- ---------- --------------- Total Coliform >1600 NPN index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN Fecal Coliform 500 MPN index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN Remarks: B~ ~,i~%/ '_drJO'cti0!`y' l`~IC@CtCr P ERECOTIVE SESSION I move to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) for consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable litigation: i.e. Grumman Fire Equipment Company. ~~ ,t ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 111991-16 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~ ~ Q~.~-~ Mary H. A len, Clerk CC: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Executive Session ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 111991-17 OF APPRECIATION TO THE ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB FOR FOUNDING THE ROANORE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most important services that can be provided by a local government; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was responsible for founding the public library system in Roanoke County in 1933, with a donation of 350 books and space in their clubhouse; and WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served between 40 and 50 patrons per day during its first decade; and WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for donating books, facilities and workers to the library system; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently stocks over 230, 000 books and serves over 1, 500 people per day, and is one of the most popular services provided to citizens of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every resident of the Roanoke Valley, does hereby extend its sincerest appreciation to the ROANOKE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB for foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library System; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes continued success to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club in all future projects. ~, r On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~..~ ' Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File George Garretson, Director, Libraries .. , R-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~B CLUB FOR FOUNDING THE ROANORE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most important services that can be provided by a local government; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was responsible for founding the public library system in Roanoke County in 1933, with a donation of 350 books and space in their clubhouse; and WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served between 40 and 50 patrons per day during its first decade; and WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for donating books, facilities and workers to the library system; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently stocks over 230, 000 books and serves over 1, 500 people per day, and is one of the most popular services provided to citizens of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every resident of the Roanoke Valley, does hereby extend its sincerest appreciation to the ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB for foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library System; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes continued success to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club in all future projects. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE 111991-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5266 WEST RIVER ROAD (TA7C MAP NO. 64.04-4-19.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held November 19, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.9 acres, as described herein, and located at 5266 West River Road, (Tax Map Number 64.04-4-19.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: STARTING at the old double locust tree at the southwest corner of the property now or formerly owned by Frank D. McDaniel (see DB 1 766, page 229); thence with the dividing line between the said McDaniel property and the property of Daniel Warren King (DB 761, page 141), N. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. W. 227.53 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING of the herein- described parcel of land, shown as 1-inch Rod Set at fence line ints.; thence with the boundary line between the subject property and the property of Daniel Warren King hereinabove mentioned, S. 76 deg. 25 min. 42 sec. W. 212.82 feet to a point located at a fence post; thence with a new division line of the original 5.658 acre tract of land, and along a fence, N. 12 deg. 51 min. 05 sec. W. 441.55 feet to an iron pipe set at fence post; thence N. 19 deg. Ol min. 35 sec. W. 18.96 feet to an iron pin which also constitutes the northeasterly corner of the 2.749 acre parcel; thence N. 10 deg. O1 min. 24 sec. W. 224.26 feet as it intersects a power line to an iron pin found on the 50-foot right-of-way on the southerly side of Virginia State Route 639 (0.8 mile to Virginia State Route 649); thence along the southerly side of said road, the following five courses and distances: S. 72 deg. 20 min. 38 sec. E. 57.12 feet (again intersecting with the power line aforesaid and with a drive) to a point, S. 64 deg. 53 min. 28 sec. E. 48.99 feet to a point, S. 59 deg. 47 min. 34 sec. E. 40.19 feet to a point, S. 55 deg. 36 min. 42 sec. E. 47.91 feet to a point, and 50 deg. 04 min. 03 sec. E. 79.61 feet, intersecting with a 10-foot gravel drive to a point located approximately 11 feet from a chain link fence post in cinder block; thence leaving said State Secondary Route 639 and with the division line of the subject property and the McDaniel property aforesaid S. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. E. 496.61 feet, through the middle of a shed to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 2.909 acres, as shown on plat prepared by David B. Scott, C.L.S., dated April 18, 1983. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 2 On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~. /191-/ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 25-11/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, staff said that a schedule has not been established for changing the Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Chappelle moved to recommend approval of the petition and further recommended that staff consider revising the Comprehensive Plan for this entire area. Mr. Witt asked that the motion be amended to complete this revision within the next six months. Ms. Chappelle agreed with Mr. Witt. The motion carved with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Gordon F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report _ Other ,. Terrance ~rington~%~ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission //qr-1 STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 25-11/91 REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid 1. NATURE OF REQUEST PETITIONER: Ms. Vickie Mack DATE: November 7, 1991 a. This request is to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance. Property is located in the Catawba Magisterial District. b. Petitioner would like to sell her house but potential buyers are unable to obtain mortgage financing due to the nonconfor~aing nature of the property. c. This property is not within an identified industrial site. The Department of Economic Development fully supports the petition to rezone. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Residential Estates District allows single family dwellings, organizational uses such as schools and churches, agricultural uses and other appropriate rural residential uses. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: This property slopes upward from the road with the house being part way up the hill. b. Ground Cover: Typical residential groundcover - grass, shrubbery, trees, driveway gravel. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar Community Planning Area. This area is designated for stimulated growth. b. General area: Many residential properties in this immediate area are also zoned M-2 including the properties directly to the east, west, and south. Also, most of the residential properties and the church, which are directly across West River Road are zoned M-2. The remaining properties are zoned A-1 and R-E. 1 /~~~~1 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use category. Considering the residential nature of this community and the fact that the Economic Development Department does not consider this area to be an industrial site the comprehensive plan designation should be revised to more accurately reflect the County's future plans for this area. 1 b. Surrounding Land: Residential and civic uses. 1 c. Neighboring Area: Rural, large lot residential. d. Traffic: No change. e. Utilities: No change. f. Drainage: No change. g. Fire and Rescue Service: No change. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Principal Industrial designation. This is an established residential area. The County has no plans to utilize this area for an industrial use. The Plan designation should be changed to reflect the County's plans for this community. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The site has been used for residential purposes for many years. The neighborhood is residential in nature. (2) The County has no intentions of developing this area in a way consistent with the Principal Industrial designation.(3) The County should initiate a revision to the Comprehensive Plan to correct the designation for this area. b. Weaknesses: (1) None. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) None. 2 lr~~~ Date Rec.: (v 1 Received By:~s Case No.: Ord. No. ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION ~ ~ - I `-'/ Q _ / .~.0'J 7 ~~ 1. Owner's Name: ~Jl;i1-~- ~. ~f~L-IL Phone:~80- Address: ~~(v~v ~~~~ i ,~iU'c°/L /~Oae/ o~~i/Fib, ~Q ~~/5~..3 ~: Applicant's Name: 3. Phone: Address : J~2 !~ ~ ~~QS~ u~/~?,e /~Gl.c/ ~/~~Ei7~, 4'A- ~y/..~ Location of Property: ~~v~~~ ~~~/ ~/ ~~/~ ,,(~OA~ ~,H1F'f~ . U~., Tax Map Number (s) : ~ "~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ '- /~ 4. Magisterial District: ~~~~cy6.9 5. Size of Property: ~ - `7 ~C~'~~s 6. Existing Zoning: >~~- Z Existing Land Use: ~~-5/0~-~/~. 7. Proposed Zoning: ~~ Proposed Land Use: ~~ 8 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: ''izi~c;~A~- (rv 0.~-TrL, o, cr 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: ~~!~ Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map ~. Application Fee ---~-~ Written Proffers . Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agen t-- /~r Signature .rcc~~ %/ ~lc~ Dat ~~ ~Jc--.- ~~ . ; ,... S!f tiueJt;CT TO ihr~aMATZON WKICH nAY 4a DIBCt,piLD 8Y ?LSLa _J1~~TItACT.• •l r•- ~ - ~1.-IIA1w ~• .~ ~~A Il d, r~,~, ``..,~, ,.... ~ ~ ~~. d s ,,. 0 ,a q ~v~rw,r~: ? ' l k `0~ :~. v ~ k o ~ ~ ~~• ~ 40 ~ r ~I~ , •~ o a .~ ..: • ~~ ~ o~c~of s~'~ NOt/.~s HOV.~ o~JM p, dEjAl~ .4 s~~Er/"tt0~ r •~r~.`~,, ~ W ;~ , •~~ x~a ~,~yE,.~ _ ~ M~tTAC.riV~O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~i,4 } y~{( {y y I~ , ~ ~ . ~s'_' ~ ~ / ~~ ~~ pAN/El N'A,FRFN /~ PRC~ ~'ME 1ZUnJ60? PR04tR?Y Ie NO ~1LZ'HiN T,HE 4ZMY'Z8 Qt TNT _.20 J ~r .~~ ~ AX /1/4. ~¢•OQ.O¢•,d/ ~`~AR l~t~QQ~D`.:~O~ND~IR,Y,;';11~.::~HbW .:,:;,, ••.:,. r ~QN.. ~'Nm PRIMA dLQQA ~1wNpAttY !!AR- ?8i~ ~ Ds~~RMINATi~SN -. IS C~ ~' ~' .BASED 0 ~p~ P4~D _ $i~DNbARY ti111f AtVO AAA l1pT ~~ a e~ ~y ~r rA 8~ ACZ'tlAL ltELO 11L~VA~'YONS. _ ~ d/' • ~. 5+0 ~ Ae'~ES, siru~l~ ~r~i; ~yY~sj Rir.r~~Io ahx ~ •. ` ^, 11 • _~~~_ • _ ,,~ , D ~• d~ vIROINIA F 0,•~i iCAli t 8Ys T. P. PAFtKGR ~ SON ~_o~.~, ~ '•''"~ ~ ~~tc..~'~.~...'. ENOiN[~Rb i S~RV~1!Q~~ ~ tTD. M~ ~ oK~O~.~i.,` t LiM viRplhlA _...,., wp. p. 1h•N~ •• IIbM.w • ..1~1(S-M~1r~1i.10f .~ ~ , ,_ ~ . v _. ~` . ,:i^ I y' rw . . .. ` ' t,,,1 ~: ~ . .~" I Iy t00' . l,~j:~ ,,, ~* ; ~` - '~ ~ • , . : _ t 1 ° M2 . . - ':~+~ a ~ / M~~ s e.ilAi - i M ~? M2 7 M? n 2~ , .. , ~.ak t.uAR ~.~ - tf .. a M ~ ~ ~ s~ .""~.. ~ 3 ~ ~ }mot, ' tiNM 1 ' ~ U + n - 9'" ~.~. li ~ M~ o ~~ f~ i ~. sa ;tt:' : - ~o A< M2 tttA. ~ . r, ~ ~C II ~ ~~Z ~ . ~ .;tk ~ ~ 1 I.oAC R ~ MZ .M ~.!!At _ b ` te-c 1 Y.1 4 t 0~1 ~ too A 0 ,,,, ., •.ti,.,,,,.. . t N ~uko MZ c l 1 1>t/AC ICI ~.~ M2 M ~t M2 :~~r~° w ~ ' '~ ~ = k .yP::. ;. •. ~ M2 x M2 M2 1 - S x ~ ~, LgAt M2 e~~ ti ~ ~ __ ~,s .WY Y6 ~2 1 aoo~c pl I ~"a~`' T., aa~~ i ras ~~ REN: I I • ~0 ~ A/ ~lOACCI t==+++ `C ~ ,fit= .-- - y.-~- ..~ 'w<~ Rg - o~~~,. ) Ac ~ ~~ R _- "r_ _ ±. I ~ ` . ~~ ~' -' MtlMta at A~ R V B I It I ~ MA - IAIiAL AMO MAPPUIY ttRvlCt ~ ' ' ' iiiA~t, WA~OpA ~ :: i •a•N i r.». .. .:._:,•. ~; ~~ ,. , y N~ ~Sul~ T~"C T , l° ~h'C ' ~ ~ . ~tf, i r ,~ , ! ~. ~ .a2. ~o C ~", ~ ~ - ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES M-2 TO R-E AND DBVBLOPMENT TAX MAP # 6 4.0 4 - 4 -19.1 i r~~~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5266 WEST RIVER ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 64.04-4- 19.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E UPON THE APPLICATION OF TH8 ROANORE COIINTY PLANNINQ~ COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held November 19, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.9 acres, as described herein, and located at 5266 West River Road, (Tax Map Number 64.04-4-19.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: STARTING at the old double locust tree at the southwest corner of the property now or formerly owned by Frank D. McDaniel (see DB 766, page 229); thence with the dividing line 1 r /1~~-1 between the saic property of Danis 141), N. 13 deg. feet to the PLACE described parcel Set at fence 1: boundary line bet the property of D mentioned, S. 7~ 212.82 feet to post; thence wit] original 5.658 ac fence, N. 12 deg feet to an iron p N. 19 deg. 01 min iron pin whi< northeasterly cox thence N. 10 deq McDaniel property and the :1 Warren King (DB 761, page 31 min. 57 sec. W. 227.53 OF BEGINNING of the herein- of land, shown as 1-inch Rod ne ints.; thence with the seen the subject property and ~niel Warren King hereinabove deg. 25 min. 42 sec. W. i point located at a fence ~ a new division line of the re tract of land, and along a . 51 min. 05 sec. W. 441.55 ipe set at fence post; thence . 35 sec. W. 18.96 feet to an h also constitutes the ner of the 2.749 acre parcel; . O1 min. 24 sec. W. 224.26 feet as it intersects a power line to an iron pin found on the 50-foot right-of-way on the southerly side of Virginia State Route 639 (0.8 mile to Virginia State Route 649); thence along the southerly side of said road, the following five courses and distances: S. 72 deg. 20 min. 38 sec. E. 57.12 feet (again intersecting with the power line aforesaid and with a drive) to a point, S. 64 deg. 53 min. 28 sec. E. 48.99 feet to a point, S. 59 deg. 47 min. 34 sec. E. 40.19 feet to a point, S. 55 deg. 36 min. 42 sec. E. 47.91 feet to a point, and 50 deg. 04 min. 03 sec. E. 79.61 feet, intersecting with a 10-foot gravel drive to a point located approximately 11 feet from a chain link fence post in cinder block; thence leaving said State Secondary Route 639 and with the division line of the subject property and the McDaniel property aforesaid S. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. E. 496.61 feet, through the middle of a shed to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 2.909 acres, as shown on plat prepared by David B. Scott, C.L.S., dated April 18, 1983. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\westrive.rd 2 `~ ,,n i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE 111991-19 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 12.387 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 0.8 MILE NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF BERRLEY ROAD AND NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RAILWAY (TAX MAP NO. 50.03- 1-7) IN THE VINTON AND HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A- 1 AND M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A- 1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held November 19, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 12.387 acre, as described herein, and located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern railway, (Tax Map Number 50-03-1-7) in the Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of A-l, Agricultural District, and M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a set iron on the northeasterly side of now or formerly Norfolk and Western Railway said point being located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road, said point further being the northerly corner of property of Joe Helms & Sons, Inc. (DB 1253, page 1); thence with the northeasterly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway N. 42 deg. 27 min. 25 sec. E. 330.90 feet to a found iron rod; thence leaving the said now or formerly Norfolk and Western Railway S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 469.22 feet to a set iron; thence N. 40 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. E. 81.26 feet to a set iron; thence S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 666.94 feet to a concrete monument (IM-303B) located on the northwesterly line of property of Blue Ridge Parkway; thence with the same S. 11 deg. 39 min. 15 sec. 399.93 feet to a concrete monument (IM-303A) located on the line of property of the aforesaid Joe Helms & Sons, Inc.; thence with the same S. 62 deg. 45 min. 10 sec. W. 172.89 feet to a 20-inch ash with old marks; thence still with property of Joe Helms & Sons, Inc. and generally following traces of an old fence N. 43 deg. 52 min. 25 sec. W. 1280.53 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 12.387 acres as shown on survey for Frank P. Ognibene and Dorothy Ognibene dated 4 June 1990, made by Mountain Top Surveyors, Inc. and further known as Tax Map No. 50-03-1-7. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ..~" - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney . ~ ~ ~ /~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 26-11/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M- 2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern railway, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if an elevation certification is needed prior to issuance of a building permit and staff replied that it may be required by engineering or building inspections. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carved with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Gordon F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report _ Other i\\ ~- - _ ,_`_~ Terrance H~ngton, retary Roanoke Qounty Planning Commission STAFF REPORT 1 / " CASE NUMBER: 26-11/91 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETTIZONER ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1991 Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A- 1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern Railway, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to construct approximately 1,000 sq.ft. of additional space onto petitioner's existing dwelling which currently straddles M-2/A-1 district boundary. b. Vicinity map indicates neighboring zoning designations. c. Property is not an identified industrial site and owner's request is supported by the Count}~s Economic Development office. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. A-1, Agricultural District permits a wide variety of rural residential, agricultural, organizational, institutional and a very limited number of commercial uses. b. Site plan review will not be required. c. VDOT will not require any change involving private entrance permit. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Flat bordering tracks southeast toward existing house which rests on a plateau above most of front yard. Steep uphill southeast of dwelling. GROUND COVER: Thick mixed deciduous evergreen forest behind house; grass and gravel driveway in front of house. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FU'T'URE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Bonsack Community Planning Area. Although Bonsack proper is designated for stimulated growth, subject site lies outside urban service limits. GENERAL AREA is undeveloped. Forests, floodplain, and elevated N&W tracks dominate the general area. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 thru 5. 1 =positive impact, 2 =negligible impact, 3 =manageable impact, 4 =disruptive impact, 5 =severe impact, and N/A =not applicable. 1l~'~-~? RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve and a flood hazard area. Rural residential uses at very low densities are encouraged with high compatibility in Rural Preserve. No portion of dwelling or its proposed expansion lie within flood hazard area. 2 SURROUNDING LAND: Single family residential, park and open space, woodland, N&W rail line, and floodplain. 2 NEIGHBORING AREA: See "surrounding land' ; also additional park and open space, woodland, and floodplain. 2 SITE LAYOUT: See "topograph}~' and "ground cover." Property is accessible via aone- mile long private drive intersecting that portion of Berkley Road maintained in City of Roanoke. 2 ARCHITECTURE: One story brick; brick expansion including kitchen, living room, dining room, family and entrance. IL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: N/A N1A AIVIENI"I'IES: N/A 3 NATURAL AMENI'TIF.S: See "drainage floodplain." TRAFFIC 2 STREET CAPACTfIF.S: No change. 2 CIRCULATION: No change. 2 WATER: Existing well. 2 SEWER: Existing septic. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Glade Creek. 3 FLOODPLAIN: Most of petitioner's front yard is located within FEMA 100 year floodplain. Dwelling itself rests well above projected 100 year flood level. Elevation certification may be required from a licensed surveyor. /i9~-a PUBLIC SERVICES ~ FIRE PROTECTION: No changes; not within established service standard. ~ RF,SCUE: No changes; not within established service standard. PARKS AND RECREATION: N/A SCHOOLS: N/A TAX BASE 2 LAND AND IIViPROVEMENT VALUE: $69,500 (land and existing dwelling) TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YF.AR: N/A TOTAL EMPLOYEES: N/A TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: Approximately $785 (current) PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve and Flood Hazard. Petitioner's request is consistent with Rural Preserve guidelines, specifically policy RP-3 (allow only limited very low density residential and limited institutional land development that is not detrimental to productive agricultural lands, forest resources, and park and open space facilities). No portion of existing dwelling or proposed addition lie within a flood hazard area. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: 1) Petitioner's property has been used residentially for several years. 2) The County does not intend to develop this area according to its industrial site inventory. WEAIdVESSES: None. PROFFERS SUGGESTED: None. ~ ~~ Date Rec.: Received By: Case No.:~ Ord. No.. ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: .~,~},~k gw~ ~~°-~~r~~ ©6~~~~.~e Phone:,~~~f~S~.ra7 O rlnJ ~ v.~- Address : ~ ~ S 13 ~ R K LE y h-Z n VR _ ~ 4 o i -~ /b3 2. Applicant's Name: ~2%¢N~-- ©!~N/ScNGr' Phone: 3Y~-~t~7 Address: /~J' /.~c~Kur ~~'o.~/~ /~~f+.~olLc lr~r ~~fo /2 3. Location of Property: d. 8 ~l~~e no Qrrr @ri5 rc:/z~~ t-Qo~+r 7tiE rOi7T Or 1n rE¢pe~c T/O iJ OF ~F[~s~ ~K~ / Tax Map Number(s): 4. Magisterial District: 5. Size of Property: 05'0 , t93 - I - (/, ~/ to ~J - f-/v L L ~,~ S /~... j ~ ~/ /~c~eES 6. Existing Zoning: ~! - 2 9^'v A - / Existing Land Use: ~es;~.~-7«~ ~s~ 7. Proposed Zoning: ~-/ Proposed Land Use: ~h ~ ~~~~=1.~-~~ ~ ~ti-~ c~~~ ~:h., . 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~a`~ ~~~"-~~- 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application ~ Concept Plan / Metes and Bounds Description List of Ad~a~ent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) / Vicinity Map N~,4 Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Age t: /~ ~ Signatur `- _ e'-~- Date j vZo-f/ <~,~C--c_ y- 3 u- 9 i ~• • Frank & Dorothy Ognibene 195 Berkley Road P.O. Box 1433 Roanoke, Virginia 24007 County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Attn: Terrance L. Harrington September 20, 1991 Director Dear Mr. Harrington, In June of 1990 we purchased a home on 12.387 acres with the intentions of adding an addition. The original papers we have showed the house in A-1 ZONE and the front of the property in M-2 ZONE. Double checking with the county, we found the house to be in the M-2 ZONE, and in order to add an addition we must have a zoning change. We feel that the zone change will be an upgrade for the area. FO;pf Respectfully, /~~ Frank O nibene - / BLUER/OGEPAA.f'N,4Y s ~- ~s~o - ~~ •~ ?B9' ~. w~c~,vr L,v~arc cou^.r~>f .vT L,~,rtur TYTOAN/•!/.OLS 5,76'04'10"E ~~ ~~ ~~ X66 ~~ ;4BL/S//ED /N /4d 66' GbGdPTfzi9 O AC4SAELOC.OTEO ~ T TF.O<ES OF 'PAGE ~/S. s U(OFENCE LOGY>PLA/rY ' B/ iOCTCl4L / .f~gKAlrNT /.K.1R70 c~Ty / ~ i Q ~ ~s/4 ~ QB'o~'4o'•E .4C~',S 666.99' ' ~ l ~ ~ 1 ~ p ~ A c f/WTLJ 696.'94' ._. __ _.... I UNCFE : E ~ ~1L UCA" BU/LO/NG PR•POSF D •L'/TENTSI ~N N4~' ~~•< N O'/9.10 "E ~w i ~ / 90.3 ~ B,l?6' METAL V U ZS I ~ 1 • ?O1B' SNEO - /S IZ. /N6LESTOFr -~ BF/C.f ~ ~ _~ ~~ .OPi',5 q/CH~li9D G. B D.4iYrVA. ~Y/JGiYEL~ __ ~ ~ ' ~ 49L1 ' Fjs G. i!./Q AO/'G. /662 / PANE O.B. /.~/6PG. ?S.9 ~v _ I ae'v~ EFf, I i : fLEPNUNEPEOEST,4( S 44' 49'90"E .sEE.~nrE' 1 / 996./0\ I // ~ 1 O ~ S ~B-0T 40"E " 46911 I f/RE F~,~~~ ~ ~~rH y o4N,a~~ NYORs1NT - - ~ w,oTE.o vaLtg-,~ .~ / voan ~,rE coati'Tr OFFi[ !~ %RX K~4~ 1 ,R~7 ~ ' NOTEFMANrYULE 1---- - ---- _ - , ~ce,aLro S'U,o3 y / - 1/LSB .9909 BER•eECFraoao - v e •1~ zS L- - THEPOr~T/ON ' _ _ NOM'OAfUr~,~NENLI' :S'/TU/!TE _ ~OAFl7Lit'.4N0 NESTEANN.4%LlY.4Y _ __ TfiLENc S'OL L/NS • /OD ' O ' /00 ' POO ' D,~ \,/~~~~ ~ ~ ~z NUBS. G NOM es ~ ~ ~' a O ~ ~ 4,~ 403 ~ \REE •/ *f IIY ~_ a! C ~ ~ gvMn ~ 3 \ 4CkER 781 ~ ` ~ ' ~y ~ °q. ~2UYNER cv ~ \ APPLEW00~ ~ ~ SPRIN 5 ^"I L-~ S ~' R' LN O ~ ~ V 658 7=~ \~\~~' JONAT HAN ~I = ~F ~ ~ 3='y ~~ ~ ,. ~ i z o OLD S ~ ` ~"0` '-; ° ° ~ HPaD f:ST RI pF'E V 604 ~ CK. os Rp ~.1~(-~ j ~ \/ CD 0.C N,Nq" °PW°° , LA BELLEVUE DqC HLN ~ } 9p t~ _ \ jL~ DE C1c. "D >< rqY \ ~ B~NSACK ~ 0 636 ~'`o ` a " `'q ~~ q ~ 240 ~~ p . F q .. ~ ~ I e'~ ~ a "I s X18 '~ 19--~ / ° ~ HUNTRIDGE~Iy`~~° ~ ~ ~i L1 BELLE 0 ~^ A P $\ , q ey ~ q~\ \ t IItN Rn_~~ wES N GEC ~,¢(~ \ 609 0" 603 ~O ~` 611 ,~ _ ~ ISTERIA~ ~„ eD~jS~'p ~ RD , ~ p 4N l Y~,. 4 ~. ~~' a `p.FE BACK-D- pqo ~~.. E ~$,,. ~~ ~ 610"\d6 oq ,~,~~ ~ Stewart cuxel,na.,~lc. «7 '~ ` ' ~~F,`,~ ~ ~ G` Knob ~~e ~A ~ \co~ a DIST T ~ 2 ,~, >~ R : ,~a • ` "r ROANOKE CENTE <~~, . pq'L ~~ ~~ FALLING %.REEK fs ~ ~ \ F TRT . aE<< o p /",; ,, - HNOL069 qQ C~O?s ~ - -"L. _. IoM"OH• ~Fq 2 v ~c'r 4Q~. a i \ ,` SODA' 7WIry '~ 2~t 0"v ~ V ~ J2 _. s t t B~ _ RKR~ PyGyk1~cF ~~ Mbt/p N o~2 ? o° ~ ¢ \ LINDA s( °'4 MHQ AArG~R ~ ti' G~ POP ~ 4Pv <o g ~ _ 24012 6`9D. NIR~ s 7ESN~{gk $ ~ 09 ~ ~ Coq DR ~°~ g GLEN PO INDUS Av ~ L O ~ DV ~ •p \ ~ ` J R ~ ~ .. HTS", ~ PARN ~s ar d4q~ ~ * YI1R0 ~°l1 ~ . ~ ~ ~7Y `\P \ y~ ~~ . ~' Q4N C1a. ~ ~ 1 ~N, Ar' n'$ ~ . I[11 ~ ~ fit`' Y h y'a ~1 YK t ° '10V . ao .. "\~ r9i^s \ ~ iy 651 t -' ~ ~' B ,y ~ P~ ~~o o ti n' 1 xn h tD. ~E 651 ' ~ ~ ~ Ti O 6t" ° .~ 'L i~ ~, SG ~ .~ ANOER 1 880 O~ DL qp q'<< 'rln TATION 1 °ES AN ~ •b ~ per q Cis F\D"' yo ~" G ' ~~ ~ D~' ~ STONEBR I D~v CRE q ~Z ~aH° ~ "i. ' ~a~~~.~ .,.,~ v~~e v;,~O ~4~~5 ~o i\~tDp .~ . ~ ~ i'~Y ~.\ 24179 ~+r se00. oh BgYIGH 618 O ,, , .~ ~ 3~\p~ ~! _ MAN L '"s ~ <+ p~ ~Fy "8t " ~ 4' ~ ~ ~O~ 9~ R ~ SIF,p I~~' "/' ' i yIP`' '` s~ ~ •d iN pY.tt Ls ~c N1 ~ t qk~, _. o ~"4P. r ~ ~ P ~~ N n r r N. _ CEOA R ` ~ ~ ~ W4srn 4DA,. ~. L - N 0 -,_ ,~.AI.L - r. ~ R INI A AV Nq y ~ ~~s'; DtNERON 4A I ~ __ ~ ~ j n ~P - HARDF AOA ? q - $ ~ . ~- 1~.. .. ' ~~ • ~ ~ OLA ~ ~' g N USN VACLE ralOptON OR. u~ q. 4 ELEN. ..-_. 634 '~~ ~ ~ oR p1L1D11R ~; ~ « FtLlO SIDE • • A ~ - piC LU lN. .E 1 "`~ K rs` ~ YN y°'~' P~ D7n DR. Eoy 1Rr a ~` 1 a S'9~i ~~ c LAnsL°"D~ EN70D /C( 6gEE" 'L`~" S(Y ' t yl ~~TIMB ' ~ `'CD $~ R A ~ ~ \'\ F N z DR.Q FARM `" j aec.cTa. ~ OD so ~ ssa s ~ 240FS~ a v '"~ 5 v N t+ 6RtARCLIFFSWIMCiu ~~~ ~ v yr ~ 9r )0 634 1034 \ ~^ + A ~'V ~ ~f g 1101 ~YCW ObFF 4q'' ar /. \ ' ~0 57N CIR. N I ' ~q"/~ SEWAGE ~'$ foeD 1r ~ / " + R ~ , _-_ „~ TREATME T BL1 4BBEYpR FI E ~/„~1-~ ~ ~ ~~~w•• 63 1, ;t~ sp dIDR ° `'PLAN DN HTS. a I 1 ~~o* ° L ~ ~4'.IV I ,'O /~,\~ ~" DD`W J" ' -DR a' i' > r- ~ \~ ` :~./ tit ._.- r e ~ _~o 'AgJI 'R I VERDALE °ypF E~4p Ro. ~ ^ ~z~~ A''e~m ~ ~R f `1C ,'i~?`~ r/~ . _ 9y ~~ NPARN qqi s L ~ ~~ lv P~ RI ? CM 'Y~~G ~/? ~~~ >YAY _' ~~' NYy N \ a ~+ !QV' RD- ~R"E 4y. ~ ` 9 r s ~ ~~y .. s ~ 1 ~ ~ x. p o r pA f r ` 4y V" •i NIGNICNO ~ `!~ NIA°A ~ ~~~w{ ED •6~ _ _ ``! ~ so~f Ai >F4 /f ~ s c~ F $- off= D 4V ` ~ AD 9p 9t O 3 `!l.\. ~ ~R \E ~I - - F. S.il~~m ~ , ~ r wonm eve ~. aD < y~o4.. LAxnsru. A'l !/GeZ V L ~~ ~ NORTB M-2 & A-1 TO A-1 COMMUNl7'f'SERVICES TAX MAP # 50.03-1-~ AND DEVELOPMENT ~iqi ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 12.387 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 0.8 MILE NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF BERKLEY ROAD AND NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RAILWAY (TAX MAP NO. 50.03-1-7) IN THE VINTON AND HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 AND M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PL~iNNINC3 COMMI88ION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held November 19, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 12.387 acre, as described herein, and located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern railway, (Tax Map Number 50-03-1-7) in the Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District, and M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3 . That said real estate is more fully described as follows /i~i~~ BEGINNING at a set iron on the northeasterly side of now or formerly Norfolk and Western Railway said point being located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road, said point further being the northerly corner of property of Joe Helms & Sons, Inc. (DB 1253, page 1); thence with the northeasterly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway N. 42 deg. 27 min. 25 sec. E. 330.90 feet to a found iron rod; thence leaving the said now or formerly Norfolk and Western Railway S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 469.22 feet to a set iron; thence N. 40 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. E. 81.26 feet to a set iron; thence S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 666.94 feet to a concrete monument (IM-303B) located on the northwesterly line of property of Blue Ridge Parkway; thence with the same S. 11 deg. 39 min. 15 sec. 399.93 feet to a concrete monument (IM-303A) located on the line of property of the aforesaid Joe Helms & Sons, Inc.; thence with the same S. 62 deg. 45 min. 10 sec. W. 172.89 feet to a 20-inch ash with old marks; thence still with property of Joe Helms & Sons, Inc. and generally following traces of an old fence N. 43 deg. 52 min. 25 sec. W. 1280.53 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 12.387 acres as shown on survey for Frank P. Ognibene and Dorothy Ognibene dated 4 June 1990, made by Mountain Top Surveyors, Inc. and further known as Tax Map No. 50-03-1-7. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\wning\berkky.rd ~~~dS~ l~~ ~~ ~~s ~~ die rs f ~reseY, ~a~i,n, ~ ~ ,F o u oC.'~-. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. l ~ ~l APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~ri ~ c z ~i d~-- o -F is s u P .S ~ ~~ •1 j, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. VVl^~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO TIIN CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. l~3 APPE CE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~--~ SUBJECT: ~~-..; ~!~ %°~ ,, .~..__ ,.~,, F' .~~~, !`' ~.~~ .~ c,~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TSE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 11111111111111111111111111111111~1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. / ~g f ' -~ APPE CE REQUEST FOR ,~ { 'PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT. ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~t~~~y~~-'L-- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will 6e given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,-~ NAME ADDRESS PHONE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. /1 ~/- 3 APPE CE REQUEST FOR ~-~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ rn r ~ ~a.t~ ,L~c h.~~~ (l - ~r~"'~ ~y/ /~'-l~ ~,u~~~~~~ ~~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO 1'I~ LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ''Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllll AGENDA ITEM NO. ~- --3 APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ' `-~al~ 1 r~~r,,--s .~,.,~,.~.~ al s~~~ c ~ n u ~ 6 0,.- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~Prc~~ a,. ~~-, ~-o%--sm- PHONE ~~~_ac3Z IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~illlllllllllllilllllllliiillllllllllillllllllll ~iq~-~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY CASE NUMBER: 27-11/91 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on 640.39 acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission requested that the landfill permit conditions and policies be revised to clarify grammer and other issues. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS See attached. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Chappelle moved to recommend approval of the petition as amended. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Gordon F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map X Staff Report _ Other ~-~~~ '~~ Terrance H 'ngton F ecretary Roanoke ounty Pl nning Commission llgl-3 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington DATE: October 31, 1991 RE: Request of Roanoke County Resource Authority to Revise Permit Conditions and Operating Policies to Provide for the Hauling of Refuse by Rail; Smith Gap Landfill; Catawba Magisterial District. Background In 1989 the Board of Supervisors adopted the permit conditions and operating policies for the proposed Smith Gap Landfill. These conditions and policies were developed by the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee, and were reviewed by the Commission prior to their adoption. At the time of their adoption, access to the proposed landfill was envisioned to be by way of a new access road through Smith Gap. The recent decision to transport all of the refuse to the landfill by rail has necessitated that the previously adopted conditions and policies be modified to reflect this option, and to extend to the residents within the proposed rail corridor the protections currently offered to property owners around the landfill site. You received the proposed modifications in your packet last month. A summary of these changes is presented below. PERMIT CONDITIONS I. Types of Waste The original intent was to separate debris and sanitary fill areas at the proposed landfill. Since that time it has been determined to be equally cost effective to intermingle these two types of waste. Areas will be set aside for "special wastes", so that their location can be known and monitored. (Pg. 1) II. operating Hours Operating hours for the delivery of waste by rail have been added to the permit conditions. (Pg. 1) These hours reflect the 1 //9'~ 3 evening delivery of waste to the landfill. As an entire days refuse will be at the site when landfill crews arrive in the morning, evening operating hours have been cutback to S:OOpm Monday-Friday, and 3:30pm on Saturday Due to the rail access, there will be no residential drop off at the landfill. Thus, residential drop-off hours have been eliminated. (Pg. 2) This service will take place at the transfer station located in Roanoke. III. Operating Controls The permit conditions are revised to indicate that residents in the rail corridor will be provided a telephone number to call to complain about noise, dust, odor, or pests. (Pg. 4) IV. Environmental Monitoring A log will be kept of all complaints of residents and businesses in the landfill area and the rail corridor. (Pg. 4) O. Screening and Buffering The existing conditions contain numerous standards for screening and buffering at the landfill. The revised conditions reflect that it may not be possible to totally buffer the rail line from surrounding residents. The proposed conditions indicate that Norfolk Southern will attempt to negotiate buffering issues, where feasible, with property owners during purchase negotiations. (Pg. 6) vI. site security Provisions for security associated with the night time delivery of waste by rail have been included in the conditions. (Pg• ~) The conditions now include standards requiring that vehicle access points to the rail spur be properly gated, locked and posted with "No Trespassing" signs. Signs will also be posted along the rail spur. (Pg. 8) OPERATING POLICIES (Note: The operating policies, are policies of the Board, and are not conditions attached to the Special Exception Permit.) 2 ~~~ I. Groundwater Protection The proposed revisions to the operating policies guarantee owners along the rail corridor groundwater protections in the event of a derailment of waste, or if landfill contamination is detected in their wells. (Pg. 11) Ii. Property value Protection The property value protections offered to residents around the landfill have been extended to cover residents within the rail corridor. (Pg. 13) Moving expense provisions have been modified to reflect that some eligible residents may now reside and wish to reside within Montgomery County, and that payment for expenses shall be made within 60 days. (Pg. 14) III. Landfill Ownership The revisions clarify that the newly formed landfill agency (Roanoke Valley Resource authority) has full responsibility for construction and operation of the landfill, and transportation of the waste under the terms of the Norfolk Southern contract. (Pg. 15) IV. Landfill Operational Priorities Protecting the interests of the residents of the rail corridor has been added as an operational priority. (Pg. 16) O. Rail Access These provisions have been added to the operating policies to reflect the importance of providing safe. and adequate rail access to the Smith Gap site. Many of these policies were discussed during the public hearings on choosing a method of transporting waste to the landfill. (Pgs. 17, 18) In summary these policies address: 1. Access control to and 2. Minimizing the number 3. Train speed. 4. Construction standards 5. Use of train whistles. 6. Timing of trains. 7. Restrictions on use of posting along the rail line. of trains per day. for grade crossings. rail spur to landfill. 3 119~~~ 8. Prohibition on use of herbicides to control ground cover. 9. Residents rights to repurchase their property at fair market value. vI. Host community Improvement Fund This fund has been extended to cover the area within the proposed rail corridor. summary The primary purpose of the proposed modifications to the permit conditions and operating policies is to extend to the residents of the rail corridor the same protections now offered to residents of the landfill area. A secondary purpose is to modify the landfill and train operating hours to reflect the hauling of waste by rail. The proposed modifications are consistent with, and further extend, the work of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee which developed the original conditions and policies adopted by the Board. In this respect, the Planning Staff supports their adoption and recommends that the Commission favorably consider these modifications. 4 `~, lr~"~Q .:~.I.f j ~l~~~l'ill ~~J~j ~'~(~~(~~-{ ~1~ 5~~./~;~ild > ,~''ll ~`~~,v'~)~~v ~~~ `, ~~\\~ ~ ~ i ~'~,(,I,~ crfy-~ `~~~ I• / r .~.rP ,, ~~// ~', ~ ~, .,~~, fir. ~/ ., ~+~ ~! , f ~" III // ', .II :,~..IfoA.,, 111 11 /,., .' X11 ~ /~ 0 vr. /rJ,,,y ti !t. 7 1 I,jl 111, 1I ~~II, /. :.,,, l1 ~ . f ~ ! I -~ ~ f~ ~~` 6 1 A" ,/ 1p~~ /~ /'/ /~~li/~) i .~I ~/~;'~l~/,/ •~ ~ J/\/\t ~~~1• I~"' • ~ ~1\\` 1`,1~!\` I~ II~ 1 I~ `,~ ~ (~~~~ `'_~ //1 I.( '111• ~, / ~ , ,'1 •` • \ ~/ 11.. - \ ~, ~~ ! /// ~ ~+f ~•~ t f ~ ~ ~ f1 ~~,(: .lff1 / ~)~JJ~ 1 ' ~ f f `.. .~ v ~ 1 t 'u ~ 1•: (~. 1 ~ „~~ +` . \ y ' ~~ ..~1 I III . ~// ' ,,I, ~ 1111. ~ ~._~ . ~ ~,~ Av v u~ . ,t ~f l j _ l60p f. ~,1~~ - •la . .~ I ;+~ .I ii~CP+ ~ ~~. ~/. J~~II '~~IY Gr ~e , r ~1 N' ~ ll , ~ ;1 ~ % • ' ~-~- ,. i1 '~ :~. I ~"~ r! I 1111 .~ ~ J ~ • /111 •ti ,,' I , ' 1 ~ ..' ~ ,11 ~~ r :~ ,I .„. •1 _ : ; , ~1 "bi , .' _ ~ ~ ~: ~' Rail Corridor Map ~ • 1,1I ~' ~ ~ •;,~o ~ ;.~i itj1:,~ •.'•'' ail f .~~ ~"' ~ ~ Rail Corridor ~ `~~° I I N ~ • •') ' II ;:~ ,:.. / 7 i., '' ~~~:.~~ \.'1,.11 .L'' '<:~~~; fa ,` '•''~•: r • 11!~I • • P~.. ; ' ;,. ~ :1 ~ - .``~•~ - ' ~~~ '.;~.. ~,. ~, Preliminary Rail ..~ ~`•'i~`•'1 ;;~ < 1,51 ~ ~1 ,. ,n~.~ ~)~~, ,1f,.. ,~ ~ I ll~ c.' Spur Location 11~~ ,, ,I .~,+..fl •,I/,. 1..I~,I~~' 1)I~ ~ ~~ \<< '~ ~,-~)2?_ •~. ~ deb. '~ ~ -~ \ ~ ~ :•, oa--•~. ) 11 ~ fl, C I,I 1 •,. ~ ~1 .--i ~en~~ , 111 `_ ~~• ;•;. ; .1" ~``• ~~ ~...'~~~ ,,; ~ 1 _ ~:. ~ .~ 1. I ~ /\ ~I ~ `I I 1 , ~ `~ 111 ~ ~'~. ~'% f 1 /i00 , ~ ,'III ~'~ •!y\1~, `1: ~_ `.. ` ? Il' .. : a.. 'lit , ~ '~~ • ~ ~\ r Il: ~ C ~ iUl (! . ,1 . II •''' ~1 '' -~ ~ i ..,,•,I ,, I;~ '.',1 11 I 1.I,I'I~\ ;I ,,,.,~~ , ~ 11„ j ~\ ~_ '~~ ~+•h .~\~1 ~'.~~• •+'Y~`l .(~l. ./ ,FF ~ ~ 1 d ~; (~'~\ 111, I ~ y , ~ ,~\• •l ~~ 1 ~. •. 111',, II/ 1. 1~1'~711, •11 ~I, : f~ 1~~~1 '~~' I. ~\1 ~ 1• i0 I , r, \ ier J~~ `~ ~ ,h ~ I I,II, •1\\•~t 1 ~ ~~'~ ° I /. fF~~l~`•: 1 ~I .~ d ~ `1111 i'f. /1' (11( '~J~~ •' ~ 1 ~' 1 I I II , I I I~ ll. ~ • l 1 `1~ ~. ~~ ! Il~/• 111 { ~1~.. ~~ i•• ;~' _ 4R~ _ 1;,11_ f ~~ ~ ~ '~ - ~<~~ ~ .- ,r ~ _ t ~ Fc --.:a _.) ('1, ..~~., ~` ail' ~ ; ~~" / ~-^-. -r ,/ ; `~~ 11 ,~f I1, ~~ It,l'~J(I"~ ~~ \J ,~' II `' ~~9 f!~w~ar~~~r~/ ,: ~•,4.-~ ~~ 1 I \~~~• +\ ~ Cern~~ -.'L` .. ~N~'-t~l ~ I~1 ~~~ /~~~ '~~ ~• ~ ,~ •1))•'.~1 ~ 1~J //~>-,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 RESOLIITION GRANTING A BPECIAL IISE PERMIT AND AMENDING CONDITIONS AND OPERATING POLICIES TO THE ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY FOR THE SMITH GAP SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY, LOCATED IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and WHEREAS, the the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter on November 19, 1991; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of amendments to the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for the solid waste disposal facility at the Smith Gap site is substatially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That this action is taken upon the petition of the Roanoke County Resource Authority. 3. That this action amends the Resolution 62789-12 of this Board adopted on June 27, 1989. 4. That the Board hereby grants a Special Exception Permit to the Roanoke County Resource Authority (and upon its creation and 1 ~~ approval by the State Corporation Commission, its successor, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority) to publicly own and operate a solid waste disposal facility on what is known as the "Smith Gap Site" located on 640.39 acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road in the Catawba Magisterial District, subject to the amended landfill permit conditions and operating policies, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5. That the Board acknowledges, to the extent permitted by law, that the Authority has a non-binding moral obligation to pay such amounts as may be needed to address the adopted operating policies, including property value protection, and that such payment is subject to future appropriations. Nothing in the approved operating policies shall be deemed to constitute the creation of a debt, the lending of the credit, nor a pledge of the credit of the County under the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, nor shall any provision thereof give any person any legal right to enforce the terms thereof against the County or the Authority. 6. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with the provisions of this resolution be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\landfill\spnseper.res 2 ~ / ~` ,~ -' PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY LANDFILL PERNIIT CONDITIONS AND OPERATING POLICIES MarcL 1991 TABL$ OF CONTENTS Paste Number Permit Conditions Types of Waste. 1 Operating Hours 1 Operating Controls. 2 Active Fill Areas 4 Environmental Monitoring. 4 Screening and Buffering 5 Site Security 7 Fire Protection and Public Water. 9 Site Rejection. 9 Policies Groundwater Protection 10 Property Value Protection 13 Appeals 15 Landfill Ownership. 15 Landfill Users. 16 Landfill Operational Priorities 16 Road Improvements and Access. 17 Hazardous Waste Collection. 18 Host Community Improvement Fund 18 Board of Supervisors Action Board Report Adopting the Roanoke County Landfill Permit Conditions and Operating Policies . 19 Resolution Granting Special Exception Permit for Boones Chapel Site 22 Resolution Granting Special Exception Permit for Smith Gap Site 24 TABL$ OF CONTENTS AMENDMENTS Page Number Permit Conditions Types of Waste. 1 Operating Hours 1 Operating Controls. 2 Environmental Monitoring. 4 Screening and Buffering 5 Site Security 7 Policies Groundwater Protection 10 Property Value Protection 13 Landfill Ownership. 15 Landfill Operational Priorities 16 Rail Access 17 Host Community Improvement Fund 18 Rail Corridor Establishment 19 Miscellaneous 19 Roanoke County Resource Authority Actions P E R M I T C O N D I T I O N S TYPES OF WASTE In order to protect surrounding residents and prolong the life of the Landfill site, the following conditions are made concerning the types of waste that may be accepted. 1. No hazardous waste will be allowed at any time during the entire life of the Landfill. 2. . Wastes designated as "special wastes" shall be disposed of in separate sections of the areas designated for sanitary waste. ~3. Non-hazardous Incinerator Ash may be disposed of 3x--a as a special waste in the new Landfill. r4. Only properly approved waste may be accepted, with the main objective always being to safely dispose of materials and prolong the useful life of the Landfill. OPERATING HOURS In consideration of the adjoining neighborhoods, it is recommended that the following operating limits be placed on the new facility: 1. Normal working hours shall be: Delivery of Waste by Authorized Vehicle Monday-Friday Saturday 8:OOam-S:OOpm 8:OOam-3:30pm Delivery of Waste by Rail Operation of all Equipment 7.•OOpm-12: DOpm 7.•OOpm-12:OOpm 8:OOam-8:OOpm 8:OOam-6:30pm 1 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT 2. Emergency operations shall allow for extended hours on all days and Sundays whenever an emergency has been duly declared by the Roanoke County Administrator. 3 :~~~-i e~e~~e~g~-e ~3. Operating hours can only be changed by action of the Board of Supervisors, after public notice and hearing. OPERATING CONTROLS Effective control over potential Landfill pests and nuisances are of great concern to all residents surrounding the Landfill site. The following policies are designed to minimize such nuisances: 1. Noise a. Noise levels generated by the Landfill machinery and equipment may not exceed the following amounts: 80 db (decibels) - Landfill site borders 65 db (decibels) - Surrounding residences b. Landfill operations vehicles must be equipped with the best possible muffler or exhaust system available to minimize noise. 2. Dust a. Fugitive dust emissions will be monitored by an authorized agent of Roanoke. County or by the Landfill Operators for compliance with state regulations. b. Problem areas arising during dry seasons will be controlled with water. c. Access roads should be cleaned and dust controlled with water if excessive amounts of dust are generated. 2 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT d. Any fill area of intermediate cover must be seeded in vegetative cover within 30 days of fill. 3. 4. Odor a. Odor problems will be minimized if the Landfill operation is conducted properly and active fill areas are covered daily. b. If problem odors exist that adversely impact surrounding residents, deodorizing agents will be used. c. All holding tanks for Leachate collection systems shall be in enclosed underground structures. Lights a. Sufficient lighting must be maintained at all times to facilitate normal operations and to provide adequate security over the Landfill site. b. Lighting must be directed inward to keep the main- body of light and glare off surrounding residents. c. Adjoining property owners will be consulted as to light placement, direction and height. d. Lighting shall be limited to fixtures attached to buildings as necessary for security and operations and freestanding poles of not more than 16 feet in height, and no lights shall exceed one footcandle of light measured at the base of the pole or structure. 5. Pests a. A bonded, licensed pest control company will be retained by the Landfill Agency throughout the active life of the Landfill to provide preventive inspections and treatments. b. Adjoining property owners who incur pest problems that are proven to be directly related to the Landfill operation must be provided proper extermination at the expense of the Landfill Agency. c. Breeding areas for flying insects must be treated as often as is necessary to prevent the breeding cycle. 3 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT 6. A telephone number will be provided for use of surrounding residents including tftose in the rail corridor to call in complaints about noise, dust, odor, or pests. These calls will be recorded and corrective actions documented. ACTIVE FILL AREAS The active areas of the landfill are regulated by the Virginia Department of Waste Management. Strict guidelines are specified in the regulations; however, the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee feels that active areas shall be designed to allow for final cover as soon as possible. Fill areas should be designed as far as practical from adjoining properties to provide maximum buffering, and in no case should extend within 100 feet of the Landfill boundary line. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 1. The responsible Landfill Agency must have all landfill facilities inspected at least annually by a qualified independent contractor to determine compliance with all special exception permit conditions and all other landfill conditions. Any violations must be reported to the responsible Landfill Agency and shall be made public information and the Landfill Agency shall take whatever steps are necessary to immediately correct the violations. 2. The responsible Landfill Agency will be required to log all complaints from any adjoining residents or businesses of the landfill and rail corridor and all reasonable and legitimate complaints shall receive the proper attention and shall be corrected immediately. The complaint log shall be open to public inspection. 4 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT SCREENING AND BUFFERING Adequate screening and buffering is a paramount concern of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. Effective screening and buffering can reduce or mitigate the adverse impacts of noise, dust and light from the landfill on adjoining properties, as well as improve the visual appearance of the landfill operation. In addition, landscaping of obtrusive buildings and active areas within the landfill can reduce the visual blight from improved properties which are above and overlook the landfill site. Finally, minimizing the size of active and disturbed areas and immediate seeding of these areas once activity ceases can further reduce this visual blight. To address these items, the following standards are recommended. Additional requirements may be formulated for site specific conditions upon review of the proposed landfill sites. Any modification shall be subject to such site specific circumstances, as determined by the Director of Planning. 1. The following buffer yard and plantings shall be established around the perimeter of the landfill property, except adjacent to an existing residential property or public or private right-of-way. Trees shall be planted in three separate rows or in clusters, where natural land characteristics allow within the buffer yard. - 50 foot buffer yard; - Three large deciduous trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard; - Five large evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard; and, - Seven small evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard. 2. In areas adjacent to an existing residential property or public or private right-of-way, the following shall be established and maintained around the perimeter of the landfill property. Trees shall be planted in three separate rows or in clusters, where natural land characteristics allow within the buffer yard. - 100 foot buffer yard; - Six large deciduous trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard; 5 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT - Ten large evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer • yard; and - Fifteen small evergreen trees with an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer yard. 3. The buffer yard may only be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails provided that: - No plant material is eliminated; - The total width of the buffer is maintained; and, - All other requirements and conditions are met. 4. Buildings, active landfill areas, equipment storage areas and other facilities shall be landscaped in such a manner as to enhance (but not necessarily screen) the visual appearance from adjoining properties. 5. The administrative standards and procedures contained under Section 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance shall apply unless more restrictive or specific standards are required above. 6. The rail line may or may not be able to be totally buffered by natural topography or feasibly by normal screening methods. Where feasible, buffering will be negotiated with the property owner during purchase negotiations. 6 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT SITE SECURITY In compliance with State regulations, the following suggestions are to make the landfill the most up to date facility. 1. All facilities shall be surrounded on all sides by natural barriers, fencing, or an equivalent means of controlling vehicles access and preventing illegal disposal. All access will be limited by gates, and such gates shall be securable and equipped with locks. a. All fencing utilized at the facility shall be adequate to control unauthorized access. b. Gates shall be at the main entrance as well as the entrance to additional service areas. 2. Access to a solid waste disposal facility (landfill) shall be permitted only when an attendant is on duty and only during daylight hours, unless otherwise specified in the facility permit, such as for rail delivery of waste. 3. Each solid waste disposal facility should be provided with an adequately lighted and heated shelter where operating personnel can exercise site control and have access to essential sanitation facilities. Lighting, heat and sanitation facilities may be provided by portable equipment as necessary. 7 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT a. Dusk to dawn lights to be placed around buildings and at each of the security gates. 4. All sanitary landfills will be equipped with permanent or mobile telephone or radio communications. a. The main security gate should be able to communicate with all necessary areas of the landfill. 5. The operator is responsible for safety hazards to operating personnel through an active safety program. a. Security rules and regulations shall be posted at each gate. b. Security guard or landfill personnel shall be on site 24 hours each day. nuz-az~s ~T--nos-az=,-~~ 6. All vehicle access points to the rail spur shall be properly gated with loch and shall be posted with "No Trespassing" signs. Signs will also be posted at intervals along the rail spur. 8 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT FIRE PROTECTION AND PUBLIC WATER Fire protection for the site shall be provided on site with adequate storage, distribution, and hydrants to properly extinguish fires. The system shall be designed as a potable water system in conformance with the standards of Roanoke County for the system ~ai~ may be deeded to Roanoke County for ownership and operation. The system shall be designed to serve all on-site water needs as well as being capable of serving adjoining properties. Expansion of the water supply system, except when groundwater contamination has been documented, shall be prohibited without prior review for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. This review shall follow the requirements and criteria outlined in Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia, and shall also apply to any proposal submitted under Section 15.1-475 (subdivision) and Section 15.1-491(h) Site Plan Review, of the Code of Virginia. SITE REJECTION The Special Exception Permit for a landfill shall become null and void upon official notification of the rejection of the site by the Department of Waste Management or the date Roanoke County selects not to submit a Part "B" application for the site. 9 PERMIT CONDITIONS AMENDMENT P O L I C I E S GROUNDWATER PROTECTION The single greatest concern of all residents surrounding a landfill site is the potential contamination of groundwater sources. Residents must be assured that the water supplies will be protected at all times. 1. The responsible Landfill Agency will take all necessary actions as required by state, federal or local laws or regulations, including permit conditions to protect the groundwater and water wells from contamination as a result of the landfill construction and operation. 2. If private groundwater sources are contaminated as a result of landfill leakage, construction, and/or operation, the responsible Landfill Agency will, at its expense, provide to each eligible resident or business a clean source of replacement water. a. The Landfill Agency may select any source of water they so desire but it must meet all applicable health standards. The newly established water system will be extended to each residence or business and connected at the Agency's expense within 120 days after the date the contamination is verified. All interior plumbing contaminated to the extent that it is rendered hazardous for continued use will be replaced at the Agency's expense. b. Eligible residents or businesses will receive free water up to 6,000 gallons per month for as long as they own and occupy the residence. All water usage over 6,000 gallons per month will be paid by the resident or business at the rates in effect at that time. Heirs of residents will qualify for free water under this provision. c. The Landfill Agency agrees to continue to provide water to subsequent owners of affected residences or businesses. However, these residents or businesses must pay the normal charge for water services being paid by other County water users. d. The Landfill Agency will provide water during the interim period between providing a new source and the well contamination. 10 POLICIES AMENDMENT 3. This guarantee will remain in force for a period equal to the State and EPA required monitoring period after closure, but not less than 25 years. 4. To be eligible for groundwater protection, each surrounding property owner (within 1,000 feet of landfill property boundary) must sign an agreement and must agree to allow water samples to be taken and tested at the Landf i 11 Agency' s expense . All property owners in the rail corridor are eligible forgroundwater protection only after a derailment of waste along the spur line or if contamination from the landfill is detected from those wells being tested quarterly. The Resource Authority will remain responsible to the property owners during a derailment. However, Norfolk Southern may be ultimately responsible under the transportation contract: a. For all wells in existence before the opening of the landfill, the initial water sample must pass all health standards and must include the chemical and bacteria tests. b. All eligible residents or businesses must allow water samples to be taken on a quarterly basis for testing by the Landfill Agency. All testing is to be done at the Landfill Agency's expense. c. For all wells which pass the initial test, if subsequent tests show contamination, it will qualify under the terms of this agreement for guaranteed replacement, unless the Landfill Agency can prove that the source of the contamination is not the landfill. d. For all wells that fail the initial test, the exact nature of the existing contamination must be recorded and sufficient additional tests taken to establish an accurate base-line of data against which to compare future tests. If future tests demonstrate a deterioration of water contamination the well will qualify under the terms of this agreement for guaranteed replacement. e. All new wells drilled (within 1,000 feet of the landfill property boundary) during the life of the landfill that pass an initial water sample test (chemical and bacteria) will qualify for groundwater protection under the terms of this agreement. 5. All surrounding property owners 5,000 feet of the landfill property boundary may elect to have .their water 11 POLICIES AMENDMENT tested at the Landfill Agency's expense. This will be a one-time only test prior to the opening of the landfill, and is to include chemical and bacteria analysis. 6. A Contingency Plan must be designed and approved, for providing potable water to surrounding residents covered under this agreement, prior to the opening of the landfill. 7. The Landfill Agency will escrow sufficient money from landfill tipping fees to guarantee fulfillment of this agreement. 12 POLICIES AMENDMENT PROPERTY VALUE PROTECTION A second major concern of residents surrounding the landfill site is the potential devaluation of their property. This is particularly true since people's homes usually represent the majority of their assets. Residents must be assured that their property values will be protected. 1. The responsible Landfill Agency will take all necessary actions as required by federal, state or local laws or regulations, including landfill permit conditions, to insure residents surrounding the landfill site that their property values will not be adversely impacted by the landfill. 2. Any resident or business owning property within 5,000 feet of the landfill site border on the day the site receives approval of the Part "B" application and issuance of a permit by the Department of Waste Management, and the site is selected for development by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, may be eligible for compensation if they can prove their property was devalued as a result of the landfill. Any resident or business owning property within the rail corridor on the day that construction begins on the rail spur may be eligible for compensation if they can prove their property was devalued as a result of the rail spur. 3. The resident must establish the value of the affected property just prior to the sale date (Appraised Value) by either obtaining an appraisal by a "Professionally Certified Appraiser" or by use of the current Roanoke County or Montgomery County tax assessments. Tax assessments must reflect 100$ of fair market value. The responsible Landfill Agency will pay 50$ of the cost of the initial appraisal up to a total of $150. Appraisals to be made as if landfill was not existing. 4. Any resident who sells their property for an amount (Sale Value) which is less than the Appraised Value determined under paragraph 3 will be eligible for compensation from the responsible Landfill Agency for the amount of this difference, subject to the following conditions: a. The responsible Landfill Agency must be given the "Right of First Refusal" to buy any property for which a bona fide offer to purchase has been received in an amount below the Appraised Value. 13 POLICIES AMENDMENT b. The responsible Landfill Agency must exercise their rights under paragraph 4a within 30 days of the date they are notified by the resident of a bona fide purchase offer. c. Appraisal shall take into account condition of property. 5. The foregoing agreement to compensate residents for loss in property values will only apply to properties sold before the termination date, which is defined as 5 years after the date the landfill is closed. Heirs of residents qualifying under paragraph 2 will be eligible for compensation under the terms of this agreement. 6. Any resident who is eligible for compensation for property devaluation under the foregoing terms of this agreement will also qualify for reimbursement of the following expenses: a. Residents or renters will receive reasonable Moving Expenses to move to a new location within ~e 25 miles of existing residence. Moving expenses are limited to the costs of transporting household goods. Requires three (3) written quotes approved by the Landfill Agency. Payments to be made within 60 days of approved expenses. b. Residents or renters will receive reimbursement for the Interest Differential between their existing mortgage loan and any new loan assumed on any replacement property within ~e-be~~~s-a= 25 miles of existing residence . This reimbursement will be defined as the present value of the remaining principal payments, discounted at the difference between the interest rates on the original loan and on the replacement loan. Payments to be made within 60 days of the new loan closing. 7. It shall be the responsibility of the resident to carry adequate property insurance to cover any loss hazards. In the event that a total loss does occur, the Landfill Agency will compensate the resident (who qualifies under the preceding terms of this agreement) for the difference between the Assessed Value and the Insurance Settlement. However, if the Insurance Settlement is for any amount less than the Sale Value, the amount of compensation will 14 POLICIES AMENDMENT be the difference between the Assessed Value and the Sale Value. For purposes of this provision, the Sale Value is understood to be• the Replacement Value of the property on the date of the insurance loss. APPEALS In order to provide a timely and inexpensive method for parties that may be damaged by the landfill permit conditions and policies, any disagreement between a property owner and the responsible Landfill Agency concerning groundwater contamination or property value damage, the matter may be resolved through the provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act, Article 2 of Title 8.01 of the Code of Virginia (Section 8.01-581.01 et sect). LANDFILL OWNERSHIP The citizens of Roanoke County feel strongly that the landfill operator needs to be responsive and accountable for properly operating, maintaining, and adhering to the conditions placed on the permit. The Landfill Agency shall remain in full control and accountable for the construction and operation of the landfill. And will be accountable for the proper transportation of waste under the Norfolk Southern transportation contract. 15 POLICIES AMENDMENT LANDFILL USERS The responsible Landfill Agency shall limit users of the Regional Landfill to qualifying residents and businesses of Roanoke County, Roanoke City, Salem and Vinton. Private haulers will be allowed to use the landfill only if the refuse that is submitted originates from one of the municipalities previously mentioned and if they have applied for and obtained a dump permit from the Landfill Operator. Surrounding counties and municipalities who elected not to participate in the Regional Landfill on the date Part "A" application was made to the Virginia Department of Waste Management (VDWM) will not be allowed to use the landfill. LANDFILL OPERATIONAL PRIORITIES Siting and permitting a new landfill under current VDWM regulations is extremely complex and difficult. This is true for technical reasons but also due to the adverse impact on surrounding residents. The Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee feels that the following priorities must be used to guide the Landfill Operator and Board in making all future policy determinations. These are listed in priority order below: 1. Protection of the environment of the Roanoke Valley Service Area. 2. Protection or extension of the useful life of the landfill. 3. Protection of the interests of the residents of the landfill host community. 4. Protection of the interests of the residents of the rail corridor. ~5. Minimization of landfill operating costs. r6. Minimization of landfill tipping fees. 16 POLICIES AMENDMENT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCESS Safe and adequate roadways leading to the landfill is a great concern of the residents of Roanoke County. Properly constructed and maintained roads are critical in the protection and safety of the adjoining neighborhoods and motorists. The following conditions are an attempt to address these issues: 1. With the construction of the landfill and prior to its opening, all secondary roads utilized as the main access to the landfill will be reconstructed to the appropriate VDOT geometric design standards and pavement category to safely handle the projected type and volume of traffic. 2. The Landfill Operator along with VDOT will properly maintain the road in good, safe repair. 3. The Landfill Operator will keep the road and the adjoining rights-of-way and properties free and clean of litter and debris originating from vehicles traveling to and from the landfill. Litter pickup is to be made a minimum of twice a week, weather permitting. 4. Roanoke County will enforce speed limits along the access roads to and from the landfill as part of regular enforcement. 5. Roanoke County will work with the impact of the additional landfill Clearbrook Elementary School Zone any landfill is opened on the Boon RAIL ACCESS VDOT to minimize the traffic through the of Route 220 South if es Chapel site. Safe and adequate rail lines to the landfill is a great concern of the residents of the rail corridor. Properly constructed and maintained rail lines are critical in protection and safety of the adjoining neighborhoods. The following conditions are an attempt to address these issues: 1. Adequate access controls and proper posting of the rail line shall be provided. 2. The number of train runs per day will be kept to a minimum. 3. Train speed shall not exceed 25 miles per hour. 17 POLICIES AMENDMENT 4. Grade crossings should be of asphalt or other surfacing material other than grave S. Train whistles should be kept to a minimum and only when necessary. 6. Train runs should be as early as possible considering timing, scheduling, traffic and operating controls. 7. Spur line shall be for landfill traffic only. 8. Ground cover and weeds shall not be controlled by use of toxic herbicides. 9 If, after purchase of property for the rail spur, the Landfill Agency or railroad determines that the rail will not be used to transport waste to the landfill, the property owners will have the right to repurchase their property at the fair market value. HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION The landfill presently being sited in Roanoke County is strictly for sanitary municipal solid waste. Since no hazardous waste will be allowed, it is important for the Regional Landfill service area to provide a means of disposing of hazardous waste. The responsible Landfill Agency or Board will develop and make public information for the proper disposal of hazardous waste. HOST COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FUND A Host Community Improvement Fund will be established through donations from the Landfill Agency for the purpose of public improvements ~e for the Host Community. The Host Community is defined as the area within 5, 000 feet of the landfill along with the rail corridor. Donations will be made annually in amounts of $10,000; however, the fund shall never exceed $150,000. The fund shall be utilized for the construction and maintenance of public improvements to Landfill Agency property approved by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission. A Public Improvement Plan shall be developed by Roanoke County with assistance from the residents of the Host Community for the expenditure of the fund. 18 POLICIES AMENDMENT RAIL CORRIDOR ESTABLISHMENT The rail corridor has been established to identify the area adjacent to the rail spur that may be influenced by the transportation of waste and the construction of the new lines Each property owner will be adequately and fairly compensated for arty land acquired for the construction of the rail line and any residue damage, if any. Those other adjoining properties may experience some effects associated with the transportation waste along the rail spur as those adjoining properties of the landfill and, therefore, should be afforded similar protection. The rail corridor has been established and limited to those properties that adjoin the rail spur property and those properties between the rail spur and State Routes 603, 629, and 622 north of existing N&W tracks as shown on the "Rail Corridor" map. MISCELLANEOUS T{re railroad's responsiveness to complaints and claims is of great concern of the rail corridor residents. The Landfill Agency will make all efforts to assist the residents in satisfying rheir concerns and obtaining quick response and resolve from the railroad. Reimbursements for legitimate livestock claims will be resolved and paid within 60 days. 19 POLICIES AMENDMENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION . -~ ACTION NO. _ ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN CWY, INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF BERKLEY COURT SUBDIVISION, AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, IN CONNECTION WITH VINYARD PARK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ - '' ~~ ~ `~ -~~ '` ~=- ~ ~-~= '~'' <<~-- Jy -~y~ r,; EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY This is the first readi g of the proposed ordinance to authorize conveyance of a perpet al easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, for sanitary sewer pur oses, and a perpetual easement, twenty feet (20') in width, fo drainage purposes, to CWY, INC., the developer of Berkley Cour Subdivision, in exchange for a perpetual access easement, fifteen in width, to the County of Roanoke for Vinyard Park. By deed of gift, dated December 27, 1984, and corrected deed of gift dated January 17, 1985, Walter Darnall Vinyard and Claiborne Wood Vinyard conveyed unto the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, a certain tract of land situate in the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, containing 41.297 acres, for park and recreational purposes. This property is commonly known as Vinyard Park. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: CWY, INC., a Virginia corporation, is currently developing Berkley Court Subdivision in the Town of Vinton. As part of the development plan for the subdivision, CWY, INC., needs to acquire a 15' sanitary sewer easement and a 20' drainage easement upon, over, under, and across a portion of the above-referenced property, which lies in the Town of Vinton and is owned by the County of Roanoke. A copy of the plat showing the location of these proposed easements is attached. The preliminary development plans have been reviewed and approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The proposed easements have been reviewed by the Department of Parks and Recreation, and they do not conflict with present or proposed County use of Vinyard Park. The development of Berkley Court Subdivision will, however, eliminate access which has previously been used by Roanoke County for entering and maintaining Vinyard Park. An alternate access, over and across a granted easement for ingress and egress, in such location as is satisfactory with the County Department of Engineering and Inspections and Department of Parks and Recreation, would be acceptable and would constitute fair consideration for the easements to CWY, Inc.. FISCAL IMPACTS• No monetary consideration has been offered to the County of Roanoke by the developer. ALTERNATIVES• (i) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for conveyance, without consideration due to the ultimate public benefit, of the above-described easements to CWY, INC. (2) Authorize the County Administrator to sell the easements to CWY, INC., for consideration equal to forty percent (40$) of the tax assessed value of the easement area, which consideration would be in accordance with the guidelines followed by County Staff in acquiring easements. (3) Decline to authorize conveyance of the easements. (4) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for conveyance of the above-described easements to CWY, INC., in exchange for conveyance of an acceptable 15' access easement to the County of Roanoke for ingress and egress to and from Vinyard Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed Ordinance in accordance with Alternative #4 above. Res ectfully submitted, Vickie L. Hu a Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ORDINANCE AIITHORISING EBCHANGE OF EABEMENTB BETWEEN CWY, INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF BERRLEY COIIRT BIIBDIVISION, AND THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, IN CONNECTION WITH VINYARD PARR WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a tract of land situate in the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, containing 41.297 acres, which is used for park and recreational purposes and is commonly known as Vinyard Park; and, WHEREAS, CWY, INC., a Virginia corporation, is currently developing an adjoining parcel of land known as Berkley Court Subdivision in the Town of Vinton; and, WHEREAS, CWY, INC., needs to acquire a 15' sanitary sewer easement and a 20' drainage easement upon, over, under, and across a portion of the Vinyard Park property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements do not conflict with the present or proposed County use of Vinyard Park, but the County does need an access easement for entering and maintaining Vinyard Park; and, WHEREAS, acquisition of an acceptable access easement for Vinyard Park constitutes a fair consideration for the conveyance of the sanitary sewer and drainage easements to CWY, INC.; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the exchange of said interests in real estate was held on November 19, 1991; and a second reading was held on December 3, 1991. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject easement areas do not conflict with other public uses and will ultimately serve a public purpose, and are hereby declared to be surplus; and, 2. That conveyance to CWY, INC., of the 15' sanitary sewer easement and the 20' drainage easement upon, over, under, and across a portion of the Vinyard Park property, located in the Town of Vinton, as shown upon the Easement Plat dated October 3, 1991, made by Balzer and Associates, Inc., attached hereto, is hereby authorized. 3. That the consideration for said easements shall be conveyance to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of an acceptable 15' access easement for ingress and egress to and from Vinyard Park, the acceptance of which is hereby authorized upon concurrence of the Board of Supervisors by resolution; and, 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the exchange, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. ti~ ih Q~ , 0 c~ ~ ~., ~I [h~ ~ i E' 4•b hGP~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~/ h ~iF ~/ RoANO~('E Co. W 0 l3oARD of ~Q•!~ I SuRERVisoRS of 17•!3./si5, pG.G57/N ~ . MAC I~ ~ 558°59 %3 "W o~ E / 29.h~/' FOYG4N0 .Q VE. S..< ,_. 64! 50' _./ -mil I - , % ia.~:.~~ / 2 ' ALL Ey -~, 8&.03 i ARa / ~ _~ _ ~/ ccEAn~s ~N£R / PROP. ~ ,CANT/EM BFCknl6Q L3E'R X~ D.~i.55/, PG. 309 ~ ~ Y C~ ' j ~ l{~. -' I ~ I .... ~ I W/LL/AM P. Y/NYARD o I p• a• /G z7, I,oG, 380 ICI ~I I ,E~ M s rf?~~T ~o /,e/w Fox ,c ~NO -t P. Q. /~ PG. 2 5~ ~~kl EASEMENT PLAT FOR 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TOWN OF VIN'TON, VIRGINIA OCIL~B);'R 3, 1991 JOB NUMBER 91097 ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~lJ Ronald R. Clark No. 1745 PLANNERS •AR~HITECTS • ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS• 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA..772-95$0 OF pOANp~~ A ti ~ ~ p Z 2 v ^: a~ /x~ 150 0 0 1 V LEAFS QQ SFSQ(IICENTENN~P~ :~ Beauti~ulBeginnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~LI~~MERICA CITY C~~~~~ 1979 1989 Mrs. Mary F. Parker, Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue, S. Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mary: November 22, 1991 Clerk W. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN GTAWElA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGSTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 111991-13 amending and reenacting Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985 (formerly Article III, of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971). This ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, November 19, 1991. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 QIIESTIONS FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY CITIZENS PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 19, 1991 David Romney, Northfork Road: 1. Asked that residents on the other side of Route 603, in other words the entire valley be afforded the same protection regarding water quality and property values. All should be given equal consideration. Pat Lavery, 4769 Northfork Road 1. The residents on both sides of Route 603 need to know to what extent the protections will be offered. Need clarification. 2. Asked for a larger geographically correct map that shows exactly where the protection will be. 3. Devaluation of the land and homes is of major concern and should not stop at Route 603 and Bradshaw Road but should extend to the whole valley. Ritty Harmon 1. Home abuts Route 603. Creek is 75 feet from the front porch. Should have the same protection as other side of Route 603. 2. Asked what type of water testing will be done when the spur is completed. What company will be doing the testing, who is an authoritative source. What criteria will be used. Asked that a water test be given both before and after the landfill goes into operation. 3. Asked for legal form to fill out outlining protections. letter from Lucille and Elmer Bower. 1. Resource Authority will take part of farm for trash train through corn field that feeds their cattle. If corn field is taken they will have to purchase feed. Who will be responsible for the ruining of the family farm and cost to feed the cattle? 2. Asked for legal confirmation that they will be compensated for damages for the whole property and not just the trash train right of way. Letter from Ellen Thompson 1. Concerned about additional flooding, decrease in property value. Want complete legal protection. Louise Spangler 1. When was corridor established? 2. Presented information from Janet Y. Smith, Erosion and Sediment Control Specialist, Division of Soil and Conservation Branch at regional office at Dublin. Asked about an approved erosion and sediment control plan that must be followed. 3. Sediment basins, etc. to trap sediment must be constructed as first step before unsloped land disturbance takes place. Separate drainage and protective basin should be every three acres. Will Resource Authority do this? 4. Why doesn't the protected corridor cross the road? 5. What if flooding is more severe? 6. Asked that corridor be extended. John Hubbard explained corridor was established prior to April 1991 and does not cross the road. John Hubbard further explained that there was no protection included for flooding because that area has always flooded. Will occur in future regardless. Montgomery County staff calculated flooding levels and felt that flood increase will be minimal. Steve asked John Hubbard to respond in writing with copies to the Board. John Hubbard will answer by end of next week. Bob Johnson reminded that rights of property owners are protected by State of Virginia regardless of the side of the road. Even in protected areas, the property owner will have to prove contamination or decreased property value. TRANSCRIPT STEVEN A. MCGRAW'8 COMMENTS YEAR-END SIIRPLIIS DISCIISSION NOVEMBER 19. 1991 Supervisor McGraw: If you would drop back in history for a moment to remind certain individuals of the process we've been through for the last eight years. When I first came on this Board of Supervisors in 1984 there were three of us who voted for a five cent real estate tax rate increase later that year, and the majority of that money went into Schools, primarily for salaries. Um, I think there was a three million dollar increase that year, the largest single increase for education in the history of Roanoke County. I was told then in my district, the Catawba District that was very conservative, that would put an end to my political career and it did not in 1987. And were I to be on this Board next year, which I will not be, and I am looking right now particularly at members of the RCEA, I'll tell you that I would be in favor of voting for a real estate tax rate increase again, especially for education, which I did in '84, and have pushed for since then, every year - every year. The process was politicized two weeks ago when 25 or 30 or so teachers showed up with RCEA members and came in and attempted to influence this Board to spend the $375, 000 then, just a few days before the election. I didn't appreciate that at all. I thought that was not the proper way to approach the thing. When the two cent tax rate reduction was passed by this Board last year, I was the only one who voted against it, primarily because I didn't want to see the average Roanoke County citizen save $16 a year and the County budget lose $600,000 a year. Now, those are the facts. What I can say to you is you can look back at the elections and it looks like the people of Roanoke County wanted a more conservative Board of Supervisors. Well, they're going to get it. And what I say to you, is that be careful what you ask for because sometimes you just might get it. OF ROANpK~ ~ ,F i ~~ 2 v a /x~ 150 {/ YEANS 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A BeautifulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE A, ALI~AM C~~~trt~ ~~ ~~~rt~r~~e 'I I' I I 1979 1989 November 21, 1991 Mrs. Anne Renner 2131 Cantle Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs. Renner: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW, CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE•CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT At the Board of Supervisors Meeting on November 19, 1991, the Health Department Board of Directors was designated as an inactive organization. Until such time as Dr. Hagan, Director of the Health Department, wishes to reactive the board, the County will not appoint anyone to serve. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors asked me to express to you their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Health Department Board of Directors. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Sincerely, 7~'La.Q-c~,~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh cc: Dr. Margaret L. Hagan, Health Department Director P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 ~~ ~. ~~ ~~w ,2~ -~ y.' ~~ . ~'~ ,~ ~: ~4. ,_ ~~~ ~F (~ ~-, -' ~~~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ ,' W~ ~_ ~ ~- ~. ~,t .~i O H Q~wua ~ ~ Q~x ~ z ~. ~~ p O~?~- ~ O Q f j~ ~y_ 1a/ J U. ~ x ~ u ~" ~~ w ~ ~ ~.w ~,~~1 '.~ - ~/w:w~N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~- z ~ -O V .~- ~ ~ ,t o~ ~~ -~o O~QOQ~ ~'~~Q ~wU,~~;~ ~.E"Ew-~~w'V ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ x V~w~~ - u ~, ~~ ~ O '~w O ~ m ~~ ~ E-~ U ~ H z a 0 u OF ROANp~~ ~ ,~ Z ~ 2 v 'a 18~$ 150. $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ -l Beauti~ulBeginninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~A1tn~LJ II~ ~II~tYtil~tF AlL AMERICA CITY '~II~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN UTAWEiA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HIL15 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS UVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT November 20, 1991 Rev. F. Tupper Garden Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church 1837 Grandin Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Reverend Garden: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for attending the meeting on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. Sincerely, ~ -~'~(' . Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on November 19, 1991, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS" TO CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~ -~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: November 10, 1991 November 17, 1991 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN Post-lt'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 of pages - -...., .r~- ~ ~ . ~c ~ Roanoke County ~- Department of Economic Development 772-2069 ; ~~ i CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDIIM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director DATE: October 31, 1991 SIIBJECT: Traffic Signal at Colonnade I met with Fred Altizer this morning to review and discuss plans for a traffic signal to be installed on Route 419 at Colonnade. VDOT has scheduled their contractor to start the project in mid- November. Bruce Hobart has told them to wait pending the outcome of discussions with Roanoke County. If delayed now, installation would not occur until late January 1992. Bruce Hobart has an agreement with VDOT to reimburse them half the cost of installing the signal. The current estimated cost is about $75,000. Billing would occur ninety (90) days after completion for Bruce's share of $37,500. I recommend that we contribute no more than $30,000 of public- private partnership funds towards the installation of the traffic signal with the following conditions: 1. Blue Cross/Blue Shield provides a letter of intent to Bruce Hobart to locate in the Colonnade II building. 2. Bruce Hobart (Hobart Companies) contributes at least 10% of the signal costs ($7,500). In my opinion, our public-private partnership investment will assist in inducing additional out-of-area prospects being courted by the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, such that a third building (Colonnade III) could be constructed. I will prepare the Board report for the November 19 Board meeting at your request. sbo WS - Design, Oper - Treatment Plant Recognitions: Harshbarger House Elementary Art Teacher of the Year Middle School Art Teacher of the Year First Library in County American Education Week Street Light - Northside High School Year-end Audit TAP Funding for TLC Policy Naming of Parks, buildings Ord - Open BUrning Fire Alarm Sewer Use Standards Soccer Field-Starkey Park Reports - Youth Haven II Noise Ordinance Tourism Setback Compliance Lease-Purchase Vinyard Park PH - Rezone - M-2 to R-E West RIver Road Rezone - A-1 to M-2 Berkley Road, Vinton December 3 PH - Rke Valley Resource Authority December 17 Weed Ord. enforcement Status of 1991-92 budget revenue projections PH - LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated : October 3 0 , 19 91 Yn-.G~~^ /'P ~ C~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, November 5, 1991 Tuesday, November 12, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Commission PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF BUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern railway, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 30, 1991 ~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, November 5, 1991 Tuesday, November 12, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Commission PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COIINTY BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on 640.39 acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 30, 1991 ~ ~~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, November 5, 1991 Tuesday, November 12, 1991 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2005 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ~ ~~ ~~, ~ ~~ ~ ..~~ d~,~ ~~~ 1 , ~(Q °~`~~ h of America's democracy tomorrow on the children in America's class- ~ay; and ~ public schools remain the surest to a future more prosperous, more dust, and more free; and 1NNE~iEAS, each community's public schools must prepare the next generation for a new constellation of social, economic, ethical, and political chal- lenges; and UIHEREAS, quality education demands the active involve- ment and collaboration of all segments of the community, AI®~r, therefore, ., serving as of Do hereby proclaim AMERICAN E~UCAT~ON WEEK NOVEMBER y7-23, 7991 Schools ~ Communities PARTNERS FOR A STRONG AMERICA _.~.. 1 i2~~ ---~-,'~ r~c~ Signed this day of 1991 . ~(( ~1 ~l ~~ - "J~ PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 11 - 17, 1990 AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, America's public schools serve all of the children of all of the people; and WHEREAS, the strength of a community Is measured by the schools it keeps; and WHEREAS, the schools of the 1990s need broad citizen support to meet the diverse needs of today's families and to help each student achieve his or her potential; and WHEREAS, educational excellence is built on the involvement of the entire community, Including parents, business leaders, elected officials, public service personnel, and senior citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of November 11 through 17, 1990, as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK and urge all citizens to observe this week with appropriate activities and to renew their commitment to the education of every child. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto set our hands and caused fhe seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this 13th day of November, 1990. Mary H. AI-en C-erk ~'C/ Richard W. Robers, airman Steve,~p A. McGraw, Vice-Chairman 10/15/91 Mary Allen: Marti Robinson called. Requested a presentation at November 19, 1991, Board Meeting at 3 p.m. for American Education Week Proclamation. Week of November 17 - 23, 1991. Present will be Kitty Boitnott, President, Roanoke County Education Association, Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Frank Thomas, Chairman, School Board, and maybe one other. He will send copy of sample proclamation and let us know for sure who will be coming. Brenda RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most important services that can be provided by a local government; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was responsible for founding the public library system in Roanoke County in 1933, with a donation of 350 books and space in their clubhouse; and WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served between 40 and 50 patrons per day during its first decade; and WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for donating books, facilities and workers to the library system; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently stocks over 230,000 books and serves over 1500 people per day, and is one of the most popular services provided to citizens of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every resident of the Roanoke Valley, does hereby extend its sincerest appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club for foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library System; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes continued success to the Junior Women's Club in all future projects. TO: Ann Marie Green FROM: Terry Harrington ~~' DATE: October 21, 1991 RE: Harshbarger House Please see the attached. Could we schedule a Board Resolution for Mr. Truett commending him for his efforts to preserve this landmark? ~:_ ..~ ary Allen Jon Hartley ~ ~ ~ ~~ °~ ~Z ~,.~~,~~ a~~~ ~' ,'~ ~ v ~fl~~®N~~f~~,~'~ Of ~~R~~~~~ Hugh C. Miller, Director October 11, 1991 Edward L. Truett Golden Era Antiques Department of Historic Resources 221 Governor Street Richmond Virginia 23219 f t t~;A ,,.. TDD: (804) 786-1934 ~;~ 1. ; ,; y 1'Qlcphgrte ~8pd) 786-31a3 r - : ~ . ~; ~ fiAX:1904). 225-4'261 t'.~ ~° 4 ocr ~ ~ , +i ~~~ICf ;.~1ca~'~' Box 111 Cloverdale, VA 24077 RE: HARSHBARaER HOUSE, Roanoke County (DHR SO-13) Dear Mr. Truett: On behalf of the Commonwealth, it gives me great pleasure to inform you that the state Board of Historic Resources has placed Harshbarger House on the Virginia Landmarks Register and has endorsed its being nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. We will be forwarding the nomination to the National Park Service following final review by Department staff. The Virginia Landmarks Register was established by an act of the General Assembly in 1966 and includes "the buildings, structures, and sites which are of statewide or national significance." It is our judgment that Harshbarger House richly deserves this official recognition as one of the Commonwealth's historic resources. The National Register of Historic Places is maintained by the National Park Service of the Department of the Interior. I am hopeful that the Keeper of the National Register will approve our nomination and place Harshbarger House on this official list of the nation's historic places. The protection of registered Virginia landmarks is of immediate concern to this office. It is our hope that you will let us know if we can be of any assistance in the preservation of this property. Many times our staff can offer advice to owners who contemplate alterations or renovations of their properties, and we welcome the opportunity to serve. Sincerely, ~. ~. I~,lr.~ Hugh Miller Dire for Enclosure Edward L. Truett Harshbarger House, Roanoke County cc: The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane Member, Virginia Senate The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr. Member, Virginia Senate The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell Member, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable G. Steven Agee Member, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum Member, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Member, Virginia House of Delegates Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator Terrance Harrington, Director Roanoke County Planning Department Kyle Robinson, Chairman Roanoke County Planning Commission Wayne Strickland, Executive Director Fifth Planning District Commission Gibson Worsham, Consultant R-91091-9 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE WITH ITEM 2 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE - URC 1. Approval of Minutes - August 13, 1991 2. Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Moose Lodge A-91091-9.a BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-LBE,RWR,BI.,T,HCN ABSTAIN-SAM 3. Acknowledgements from VDOT of additions, renumberings, discontinuances and abandonment from the Secondary System. A-91091-9.b 4. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Elementary School PTA. A-91091-9.c K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED ABOUT POLICY FOR NANIING OF PARKS. ECH TO BRING BRICK POLICY IN 90 DAYS (11/19/91) (2) +•~~~ ' '~ ~ ~~•~~ A~/! 1rT.T~iw ~.\ • !9T\ I9TTT-/Tw.T October 23, 1991 MA: ECH and I talked about the Oct. 22 action agenda and the upcoming reports that he is responsible for. On the weed ordinance report due 12-17 and the tourism report due 11-19, he says please put on your planning board. He will have Diane Hyatt schedule a meeting of the Audit Committee at 2 p.m. on 11-19. M H cc - Diane Hyatt H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article III, Sewer Use Standards of Chapter 16 Code of 1971 (Chapter 18, Code of 1985) (CONTINUED FROM TULY 23, 1991) (THIS ITEM IS CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 24, 1991.) BLOT MOTION TO CONTINUE. TO 9/24/91 - i1W ~~~~~~~ 2. Ordinance ratifying and confirming the acquisition and 5 H. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 11/19/91 URC 1. An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. 2. An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to the Valley Soccer Club. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 11/19/91 URC J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to 4 SUPERVISOR NICKENS: ASKED FOR REPORT ON INFORMATION REGARDING ROANOKE COUNTY'S CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD TOURISM. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: (1) ASKED WHEN AUDIT REPORT WOULD BE READY. ECH WILL HAVE ON 11/19/91 MEETING AND WILL SCHEDULE AUDIT COMNIITTEE MEETING FOR THAT DATE. (2) ASKED THAT REPORT ON TOURISM INCLUDE BOTH FINANCIAL AND INI~ND CONTRIBU'T'IONS FROM ROANOKE COUNTY. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) THE VACO/VML TASK FORCE WILL MEET AT END OF NOVEMBER (2) RECEIVED PETITION FROM CITIZENS IN WEST ROANOKE COUN'T'Y. ASKED THAT IT BE SUBNIITTED TO STAFF FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YFAR'S VDOT HEARINGS AND THAT LETTER BE SENT TO MR HOWELL. ECH WILL FOLLOW THROUGH. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE O. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) VACO/VNiL TASK FORCE COMING TO CONCLUSION AND WILL MEET IN NOVEMBER TO DISCUSS ARFAS OF CONCERN. (2) ASKED STAFF TO DRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE. PMM PLANS TO BRING BACK REPORT ON 11/19/91 ON RESULTS OF NOISE ORDINANCE IN ROANOKE CITY. L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMIVIUNICATIONS NONE M. REPORTS BI;T TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 5 UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 6 COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1991 JANIIARY FEBRIIARY REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION ~rv~~ ~ ~~ ~1 ~ ~ i Three year term of Richard W. Robers will expire 02/10/91. MARCH LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COIINCIL One year term of Frances R. Holsinger will expire 03/31/91. LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS One year term of Murry K. White will expire 03/31/91. APRIL TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year terms of Lt. Art LaPrade for the County Police; Fred C. Altizer, Jr., for the Virginia Department of Transportation; H. Rodney Smith for the Senior Citizens, and Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison, will expire 04/01/91. MAY JIINE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of Eldon L. Karr, Windsor Hills District, will expire 06/30/91. CLEAN VALLEY COIINCIL Two year terms of Vince Reynolds and Richard W. Robers, Advisory Member, will expire 06/30/91. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Three year term of Charles Steve Garrett will expire 06/30/91. 1 PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District; Yvonne Willis, Catawba District; James Bryant, Hollins District; Paul D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District; and Roger L. Falls, Vinton District; will expire 06/30/91. ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Four year terms of Frank E. Thomas, Catawba District, and Barbara Chewning, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/91. VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD Four year terms of Stephen A. Musselwhite and Jean Glontz will expire 06/30/91. JULY ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD Four year term of John Hubbard, will expire 07/31/91. AUGUST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD One year terms of Bernard Hairston and Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate, will expire 08/31/91. GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 09/27/91. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Four year terms of Charles R. Saul and Bill Triplett will expire 09/26/91. OCTOBER GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Cecil Hill, Alternate, will expire 10/12/91. a NOVEMBER HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Two year term of Anne Renner will expire 11/26/91. DECEMBER ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY Four year terms of Steven A. McGraw and Richard W. Robers will expire 12/31/91. COIIRT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD Three year terms of Harry C. Nickens and Betty Pullen will expire 12/31/91. LIBRARY BOARD Four year terms of Jane Bryant, Catawba District, and Dr. Paul M. Zeis, Windsor Hills District, will expire 12/31/91. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD Three year terms of Rita J. Gliniecki, and Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large, will expire 12/31/91. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year terms of Ronald L. Massey, Hollins District and Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring District, will expire 12/31/91. 3 1990 IINFILLED COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of M. E. Maxey, Chairman, Vinton District, expired 06/30/90. BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell expired 12/12/90. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, expired 12/31/90. APPOINTMENTS/VACANCIES TO BE FILLED FOR 1991 DISTRICT TERM EICPIRES ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY Steven A. McGraw Catawba 4 yrs 12/31/91 Richard W. Robers Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Eldon L. Karr Windsor Hills 5 yrs 06/30/91 M. E. Maxey, Chairman Vinton 5 yrs 06/30/90 BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT3 AND APPEALS Wilmore T. Leffell 4 yrs 12/12/90 CLEAN VALLEY COIINCIL Vince Reynolds 2 yrs 06/30/91 Richard W. Robers, Advisory 2 yrs 06/30/91 COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS RESOIIRCES BOARD Bernard Hairston 1 yr 08/13/91 Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate 1 yr 08/13/91 COIIRT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COIINCIL/YOIITH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD (INACTIVE UNTIL FIIRTHER NOTICE) James K. Sanders Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/91 Gerald Curtiss Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90 Roger Smith Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90 Gary J. Minter Hollins 2 yrs 03/22/90 Sherry Robison Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/90 Hoyt C. Rath Vinton 2 yrs 01/26/89 James L. Trout Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89 Ted R. Powell Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89 Dr. J. Andrew Archer Vinton 2 yrs 03/22/88 Youth Members Cave Spring 1 yr William Byrd 1 yr 1 PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Kenneth D. Bowen Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91 Yvonne Willis Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91 James Bryant Hollins 3 yrs 06/30/91 Paul D. Bailey Windsor Hills 3 yrs 06/30/91 Roger L. Falls Vinton 3 yrs 06/30/91 ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Ronald L. Massey Hollins 4 yrs 12/31/91 Donald R. Witt Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91 A. Kyle Robinson Vinton 4 yrs 12/31/90 REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Richard W. Robers 3 yrs 02/10/91 ROANORE COIINTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Frank E. Thomas Catawba 4 yrs 06/30/91 Barbara Chewning Vinton 4 yrs 06/30/91 ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD John Hubbard 4 yrs 07/31/91 TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Lt. Art LaPrade, County Police 4 yrs 04/01/91 Fred C. Altizer, Jr., VDOT, Cave Spring 4 yrs 04/01/91 H. Rodney Smith, Sen.Citizen, Windsor Hills 4 yrs 04/01/91 Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison Vinton 4 yrs 04/01/91 VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMIINITY COLLEGE BOARD Stephen A. Musselwhite Jean Glontz 4 yrs 06/30/91 4 yrs 06/30/91 3 Glenvar High 1 yr Northside High 1 yr COIIRT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD Harry C. Nickens Betty Pullen FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Charles Steve Garrett GRIEVANCE PANEL Kim Owens Cecil Hill, Alternate HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Anne Renner INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY Charles R. Saul Bill Triplett LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COIINCIL Frances R. Holsinger LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS Murry K. White 3 yrs 3 yrs 3 yrs 2 yrs 3 yrs 2 yrs 4 yrs 4 yrs 1 yr LIBRARY BOARD Jane Bryant Catawba 4 yrs Dr. Paul M. Zeis Windsor Hills 4 yrs MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD Rita J. Gliniecki 3 yrs Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large 3 yrs 2 12/31/91 12/31/91 06/30/91 09/27/91 10/12/91 11/26/91 09/26/91 09/26/91 03/31/91 03/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 12/31/91 R-91091-10 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AT 6:46 - URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P M ) P. WORK SESSION 1. Joint Work Session with Board of Zoning Appeals ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT IN 60 DAYS (11/19/91) ON WAYS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SETBACK REQUIREMENTS CONSENSUS TO SET ANOTHER WORK SESSION IN SIX MONTHS (MARCH 1992) 2. Privatization NO CONSENSUS TO GO FORWARD AT THIS TIME Q. ADJOURNMENT HCN MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 935 P.M. UW 9 Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of security and fire alarm systems. (COr~TINLTED TO NOVEMBER 19, 1991) CONTIlVUED TO 11/19/91 K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board 2. Grievance Panel. ~ ~ ~ ~ °1 3. Health Department Board of Directors LBE SUGGESTED THAT THIS APPOINTMENT BE DROPPED UNTIL THE BOARD BECOMES ACTIVE. 4. Library Board ECH ASKED THAT APPOIIVTMENTS TO THIS BOARD BE DEFERRED 5. Planning Commission 6. Roanoke Valley Resource Authority L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION Ilv THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 5 I~~~ c.~~.~-E bt. ~ . "l ' ~ ~ ~ '~~ ~~ r ,~~~ '` ~'~'`~ ~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY ~`.~' ;» ~' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT .i MEMO T0: Elmer G. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Stephen H. Carpen Parks and Recreation DATE: September 3, 1991 SUBJECT: Equestrian Committee Request At their regularly scheduled meeting held today, the Roanoke County Equestrian Committee requested permission to appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, September 24, 1991. The purpose of the request is to formally present a framed photograph of the Green Hill Park Equestrian Center to Joe Thomas, Sr. in appreciation for his donated work which helped the Equestrian Center a reality. Possible a Resolution of Appreciation from the Board of Supervisors would also be in order. The Equestrian Committee would also like to bring the Board up to date regarding the success of the Equestrian Center and their planned activities, Please let me know if I can make arrangements for the Equestrian Committee and Mr. Joe Thomas to attend the September 24, 1991, Board meeting. Thank you. SC/bb MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors Members FROM: Joseph B. Obenshain ~ / Senior Assistant County Att r y DATE: October 4, 1991 ' SUBJECT: Open Burning Ordinance - Proposed SAPCB approval I am providing for your advance review the proposed "Open Burning" ordinance which will soon be presented to the Board for official action. State law, § 10.1-1321 requires that the State Air Pollution Control Board [SAPCB) must approve any local ordinance relating to air pollution before it becomes legally effective. My intention is to submit this proposed ordinance to the SAPCB within the next ten days in the final form which we hope it to have upon passage. This proposed ordinance adopts by reference the state's regulations on open burning and establishes a permit system to enforce and regulate this process. No permit would be required for practices, such as agricultural or forest management practices, which are currently permitted by the SAPCB regulations without permits in the rural areas of the county. The SAPCB regional office has estimated that the approval process may take as long as six to eight weeks. In order to avoid a major delay necessitated by having to resubmit our ordinance should changes be made at 1st or 2nd reading, I would appreciate receiving any comments you might have within the next ten days. /jbo AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE I, OPEN BURNING, TO PROVIDE FOR A PERMIT SYSTEM FOR THE REGULATION OF OPEN BURNING AND TO PERMIT THE OPEN BURNING OF LEAVES FROM TREES WHEREAS, at present the Virginia Department of Air Pollution Control, the Virginia Division of Forestry .and the Roanoke County Fire Marshal's Office all have overlapping and potentially conflicting jurisdiction over open burning occurring within the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the regulations of the Department of Air Pollution Control provide that local ordinances concerning leaf burning shall supersede the Department's regulations and that local ordinances which are as least as restrictive as the Department's regulations shall likewise supersede the Department's regulations on that subject; and WHEREAS, the Department of Air Pollution Control has indicated that it lacks the manpower and other resources to enforce its regulations controlling open burning within the County of Roanoke, and citizens of the County have indicated frustration and confusion in attempting to deal with the overlapping agencies and conflicting regulations governing open burning within the county; WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took .place on and the second reading and public hearing of this ordinance took place on BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a new Article I, "Roanoke County Open Burning Regulations" of Chapter 3, "Air Pollution" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and enacted as follows: ARTICLE I. ROANOKE COUNTY OPEN BURNING REGULATIONS Sec. 3-i. Permitted open burning of leaves from trees. a. In those areas of the county r~:`<`~~ ~..;•.. vi:}iiii•%?.:{v..>UJ4:+%Ai:?ii~riJC•:??i::: •::::.ii'riiiii::hi: iiiiii'{i4Nn'i~GG'r, •• ••••• :L?+;?:':'.~''i ~ i:;:'~":;ii;;: i::i::: ~? • {i::i: :%::::: •.~:yj. •:i.":i?iF ~••' ~''~' i::ii::t`::iii:Jiiii::' ;?:i::i:::; ':nii::i?:: :..i:?^:^{?:?CL{i4iY.: •.u:•iv:?.}:.i}i}ii:' }iiiiiii:.}}}:w: • v.: : ......+ ......................:: :w:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:::: ::w:::.::::::::•:w::r ?ry:::::4:L??:.:•i:::: is i:.~:::: Oii:4ii .:C ~:Oii::4: i:4iiiii:4i:'!i0 fif3~~e ~~ , ,~ ,..~ Q...,~'i fse~rs~•s =tee e ~g o ~ez-e fete e€-Bret--les•e ~a~r--per-e9--~~~ the open burning of leaves from trees shall be permitted after the hour of 4:00 p.m. and before sunset o~~:~e;~ys--between September 15 and December 1 and between March 1 and May 15, subject to the requirements of subsection c. b. In all other areas of the county except those covered by subsection a, the open burning of leaves from trees is permitted after the hours of 4:00 p.m. and before sunset from March 1 through May 15 or at any time of the weep day during the rest of the year, subject to the requirements of subsection c. c. The following conditions shall apply to all open burning permitted by this section, as follows: 1. The burning shall take place only upon the residential. lot or adjoining property owned by the individual who conducts .... M t. such burnin ~""'" '~"'~' ~ ~ • ~~ .;. •, ~. g. :::::~~ • ...::~ .: :~ :.. • • t. ... .:.. . ::::' Abil.{?::ilrYh'ris. rii..J•. `:VR4'/ .,r .. .................:.... : ... .. • ~ y} ~„•.,•~. •~' nwtiir?nRy.,.:ndfl.Gi r'w,+>sx~a~.•'.\~'>•,'VAV! :: +:'•~~• .;. ~{ •^~^.v; .{.x. v{.,yi~,N,~I,.!:iC.:/{{?.,:{:..;, }v,{r{..•x.•r: r{ryn;.w,,,v,... . {~+ r .: :' •" ~ ~: ;r.::.,~~yy~:~:~{ ~~F?, fay +{'•r:.. .,. `;:, rivy'? ~{Cr: M1iiu{rr;v.:ryy,: ~....v......JAt...:....~, fY/F..?:;::•FI.Mi;.+l..?ti~:~M•IM:iM. . .. 7 :•:::::%•}]OOC 4i•::::??i?ri..::???+iiir%fF//N:r:CCtt:;{;'rtivti:•:i+iif ~?iiii:~iiii:}:::iii:::::•i: ii: ~: ri •::::'•i::•S?i:•::: i:: ~: ~::' .: :................... ... ~ry~.G;ki::•M~I/%:j~i~iiiF:. ..• .............................::: f.:~i.•%•:::vvv::::L.:.•;.:::!{.;{::::•:{?::::: n:.: of ffffli ii\~J:<ti:::jjC:;'y`: i:::•::•iY•i:~?~Yi •~.4 .; .... M1,~ ~ ~ ........... 2. The location of any burning shall be not less than 300 feet from any occupied building unless the occupant(s) have given their prior permission in writing, but in no case may such burning be closer than 50 feet to any structure. 3. The fire or burning shall be attended at all times, and until completely extinguished, by a competent adult who is physically capable of taking reasonable efforts to control such burning. d. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as authorizing any other open burning except as shall be lawfully permitted by county ordinance or regulation or state law or regulation. e. The Office of the Fire Marshal of the County of Roanoke shall have the power to enforce this section Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor and be punished in accordance with Sec 1-10. If any fire shall originate from the open burning of leaves by any person, such person shall, in addition to any fine, be liable to the county for the full amount of all expenses incurred by the county in suppressing such fire. Such amount shall be recoverable in a civil action brought on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. sec 3-2. open Burning Regulations. a. impose. It is the u ~~~~~ ~"'~"` ""~~ ~~~ --~ - p rpose of this ~~ =m~~-to ......:::.:::v:..... establish a permit program for certain types of open burning within the county under standards that are consistent with and no less stringent than the requirements of the Department of Air Pollution Control and the Statewide Fire Prevention Code. b. State regulations adopted. The regulations of the Department of Air Pollution Control, effective January 1, 1988 or their successor, governing "OPEN BURNING" (RULE 4-40), and in particular § 120-04-4001 through § 120-04-4005, and the provisions of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code, 8th edition, adopted April 15, 1991, governing open burning, and in particular Section F-301.0 "OPEN BURNING", are hereby adopted by reference and made a part hereof to the same extent as if set out at length herein. For the purpose of this ordinance, the terms "the board", "the executive director", and "the regional director" as they appear in the aforesaid regulations or Code shall mean the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County, his assistants or designees. c. Permit svstem. Other than as lawfully permitted by Sec 3-1, it shall be unlawful for any person within the boundaries of the County of Roanoke to undertake or permit any open burning otherwise permitted by state regulations under subsection b without obtaining a valid permit in accordance with this subsection. 1. The Fire Marshal or his assistants <r>,;. ;.;:~ are ......................:::.~Y,:.~« authorized to issue permits for open burning after being contacted by the owner of the property upon which such burning shall take place, or his/her authorized agent, and physically examining the location to insure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and that such burning will not present an undue danger to life or property. i^`i: :~i::`•:. nib:::: }Yxxrr{.}}v.;rmn}:x?? } .y~ YMhy^i:•:.v?Hr: ••.:7M .JM:^};yY r• .M ., YfN~?H^!?{!!: ? :4,M:f.???Y.^:?•:..,•.;.•.k,....}....:n~ • ;.:: . • .' ,;;.. .::::::: ~..:..~::::::•:o•.:?•:.:::::;?.:c:~.:.::.::aY~w:>:w::ti:::;;.::::%:r.::::wneu?.»s::?,::.:?w.Y::x::;:G:;.is:.~...;.~.;~.,:::.:;.v~:::daia~ ':'~} v.::;'•,';:;::'::0:.%.xi:Syr:~~.~r~.••~~:;{.:i'i::LCiy~:~i::i:;isi{ii'}:•:i::isyi:::::;{%~':~~::~~}:?'...iisi:{•}::'rG::tii~sfinYi:'}.....:'.;{i:';':::in•:.;. •4;{n?.{t.{.yr:::~ f•?•~~i'i': i.. r. ~j ~/~ I~ .( ^'•:{iiy t . '~ ~....~ ~ ......... afiiM~... ~4~~~w.#•~~~rlf~ ~~ ~h~ f~~~~j:~~„{1i,•~i~i::~~,~,11~:i~::~i.~v:,:I,.'.i ~. .: :: .:. ......... ......... ..........................:::::::::nw::.::v:::::::; .•:::viii:iii}isiv:...............::::::::::::::. :..;• ... ....................... v.v ......................•..nv%~/~ -:: i:'.i:G:?i• • v; . ;. v.:v v w:::.::::::: • w: v.:w:: v: x:::.}.i: {::v.:: v: u:::......::.v.v:.y:.{: y:::. ... v ... ., .:i.....~.. +..:...::. ,::::::i:::: .. ...i ...:::::. ~~J:{~..,•R.,{yv{h:(v.~.r.~. r .:.._.: ~ii::i: :i~1"j:~i:..i.~}.i.~j.: '.7y~,'.,'~:.~:A.: ii~;l'•:~:ry{•:,•:::;i:}•: •iii/:i1:~::i:::::iffl,' :. Fih~~~ ~~~~ ~h .~ ~Nt•MRI-Ki~Y~t~:r:::S/•:n'r,:~,4.,~M,~:M~F~W .F ~I :::,:~~..... .. .n., in..n ... .. n..... ......... ........: iii::4}::4iiii: , . ........::.•r::::::~.::.w::m :.: m:::: ...:..}... .....xu: iii>ii}W:Y iy ' 'r;•{:n•.{i :: :..:.:...:.: ::•w;:.v::•::nv:::.x.:ix:::,.w:•ivi's,..4yvm:: xn:v:+.yw;:: •i: ~in: is }~.'1.ix.;.:iy,•isti:..i.•..r.r:r:{.}::rxx.i}:vv.:.. i:.}:{: ••{x.. -:::::. ...,,..:>ii:.iiii:.::z:;::::.::.ii:.i:•>::>::>::::>::i~i:>s:~::>: <> i.: rr:: ••: rr:::~ :......:....., , ~~~.:«z::. ::: : .:: .:::..:.......:fa :.:.,.:.M................,.:....:.......:.., :.::.::::: .. .:.. ~ '~t•'~a~a' ~~is.~:ao-:: ~:..;.>..:..:, f ::.:;..:: ~ :~ ~ : • :...::i::::... i;:.<,"::,:,«::ii: ':::: f<ii:..i.>;:i• .i.:.i:.:i:;:;;::<.y,.:.;.•,9o:.~oe .. eaegow. :. .:::::::.:::::::::::::::.i:.. ......... ,...,..:.. 3A.~, ... :::....::.:.::... N::,;: w ::: <:;::::: •,: •o: • ••:i•.•.:.:..::.o: ~fm.••::.i.::<iii...rf.?..ii: ..;.i i..:~••»••::i.,;iii.;;ii: iiviii:::iiyyy:.i., iio. ti .:::::::::. ~.. ~,~, ::.: ~ ?~+ 4 ~X~i •v'~N'.iii.:x •..k..:....ii:;x.,v?r:x,^!K!AYf :..:::,~::ii,:iiiii:i:.ii:.>iii:.iii:r>i;;<::a~-:::~>:~:::>:::>~:~:>::;.:~:n :.. •• .. ::::..r.isi::.i..:.~ :................:.............. ....::::.... • ..:..:. .. ....:.:::.......::::Fi.Nr:::::.iii:::ii>ri~,iii:.:::>:::~:.;::......... ....: i.. ir.:C•,v,~M:{n:i:~i:::.:::uror .w.i.. ::.:i^:H.•+..}}•H.+fp}v .%{C,y,:x ;.viv:v..:.v::: r :. N..,H.:n::•.iiGtiiriw•.:iipy, nny:,~ ::...,... ........... ~... '~~~::.::.~.N:..~C~ •iFfi}iiiiX4iiiv:i•:iVi::.:ii.:~iiv%~nii}4~iG:•itiim4'i••••••..:.:••••. •: .,'x:. iC ll.<:..,.•• ~• '!•!yR':' •••. ~y~•i: :: ~. •: ••• • . ffrk+i: i•:•:•ii•:i•:ti+f~: i • • •,• : kiFn•)C4lf.4ri~iriiLri4'}i:{tii{::Si'ri7,~:; %i ~•' •'~(~d "~i( y rL:?Ji;•w.n••{.:.w.;n:;vvx~nv,.;nr lrr,:+~wimrii..v,.:..nrmnvx}yi;..,mwx.,w.: f. .:.. :. 44~' '.::.;'f.?;ky:~ iGi:::: ~ ... :: .:.i'f.'f,.': : ~ .. ~. '...: ~ .:: i::i::..:. ••:1f1fA.:•Y•..•vwrnmrw.}', . i.:r ,.;.nwi.:.vp~ :::' .: ::..........:..:.:.........v........... .................::....,::......:..:.................~..:. •~ ................ ....::::::.::::...:.iiv:~ .ii:.i:.iii..........::::::::::::~i~:i:;:Y:::io~:i'.,, _. ii,~i:...:i<i..v««..:~:.>ii:.:.::::i•..i:::x.,..~..w.k.:iv,.w.>:. ... ..::...... ~r~~~:~>::~::.i :... .::::...i.....,..,. ... .. . ~: .,..~~~ ., ems :..::::::.::. • . :.:.::.i:<>~<.:.: is .... :i4}.:.::. f/.p '• iY,:: ti{.;r<i.:.:: r: x:: fN..{{.•v{i.~ 2. Open burning operations shall be permitted consistent with the requirements of subsection (b) upon the responsible party obtaining a permit from ~::...: •: ~ i i. .....»~kf•.J.[de:F,t.'f~w•'%/rfacC:aaiH~R}{:i:~~A~l~i;~'~~aIW'~d~k~ :. :• :, a ....w,,:.•AcGff3 rXYY,io." Cfdxkv`:ic:'•.. .'v't~ila'fi'::,.:ccGi„b;ur;;c" ;::.. °.......:.:.• ~ ..:..:...:::..:... and upon payment of the required fee as specified herein: (i) for residential burning within the boundary of such t residential tax parcel by the owner of any residence - payment of a fee of $25.00 ; (ii) for business/commercial burning by the owner of a business or commercial premises holding a current Roanoke County Business License decal - payment of a fee of $50.00 ; (iii) for construction or other related operation by an individual or firm holding a valid Roanoke County building: ~~---demolition ~~'~' ermit for the ...................::.....................::: P property upon which the burning will be conducted - payment of a fee of $100.00. (d) Penalties. The penalty for any violation which would constitute a violation of state law or regulation shall be as prescribed by state law. The Office of the Fire Marshal of the County of Roanoke shall have the power to enforce this section. Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor and be punished in accordance with Sec 1-10. If any fire shall originate from any open burning regulated by this section by any person, such person shall, in addition to any fine, be liable to the county for the full amount of all expenses incurred by the county in suppressing such fire. Such amount shall be recoverable in a civil action brought on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after /jbo • ~ it A ~'F ~, L ~- ~o z ~ z a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153 October 25, 1991 TO: Mrs. Mary Allen FROM: Ruth Wade Enclosed are two appropriation resolutions which we would like for the Board of Supervisors to consider at its November 19 meeting. Dr. Kolb and Dr. Kyle will attend the meeting. Enclosures (2) c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt M E M O RAN D U M TO: Elmer Hodge FROM: Don Myers ~~~ DATE: September 24, 1991 RE: Traffic Light at Intersection of Route 117 and Northside High School Road --------------------------------------------------------- I have contacted Fred Altizer of VDOT and Bob Bengston at the City of Roanoke regarding the subject traffic light and have determined the following: o According to Bob Bengston, the light is estimated to cost an upper limit of $100,000. o The City is willing to pay its share. o Fred Altizer has indicated that VDOT would contribute one-fourth toward the cost of the light. o Bayse Wilson has agreed to pay for one-half the County share. I am presently working to identify the source of funds for the remaining portion. o At this point, there is no firm commitment from Kroger to participate in the funding of the light. We should probably contact Mr. Sieveking at Kroger directly to determine their position. ~\ r ~ .,,I ~ ROANp~ DeC F AII~AMERICA CIT ~~ ~ ~ Yt.~~~e ~~IlI~ ~~~~ v "'_ ''a ~ 1979 150 p 1989 18 YEARS $° OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY SFSQUICENTENN~P`' A Beauti~ul Beginning PAUL M. MAHONEY November 5, 1991 I(~SFPH B. OBENSHAIN COUNTY ATTORNEY - -~` Seth P. Oginz, President `' >t . ~ ~ ;' SECURITY CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED - P. O. Box 4693 Roanoke, VA 24015 Re: False Alarm Ordinance G Roanoke County ~~ Dear Seth: I am enclosing for your review the latest draft of the proposed "false alarm ordinance" for Roanoke County. It is still the intention of the county administration to present this ordinance to the Board of Supervisors at their November 19 meeting for final adoption. If you have any further comments or suggestions, I would appreciate receiving them by next Tuesday, November 12, so that any necessary changes can be made before the agenda is distributed to the Board by the end of that week. I believe that you will find that this draft reflects all of the matters which were discussed in our meeting with you on October 16, 1991, with one exception. After considerable discussion among the county officials involved, it is our recommendation not to include a representative of your industry upon the review panel provided for in Section 16-27 for a number of reasons. First is a philosophical concern about permitting a private individual to make decisions about matters which directly involve public safety. Secondly, there are logistical concerns about difficulties is scheduling such hearing with outside members and the problems when conflicts of interest develop between the appealing party and the industry panel member. We are hopeful that the other changes which have been made to this proposed ordinance are acceptable to you and that you will be willing to support its adoption on those matters. However, we would certainly understand any views which you might wish to press upon the Board of Supervisors concerning the composition of the appeals panel. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2007 Page Two 5 November 1991 Let me again extend to you the appreciation of the county administration for you time and energy in working with us in developing a false alarm ordinance which will be of significant benefit to both the citizens of Roanoke County and their public servants within county govemment. ty yours, B. benshain, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Enclosure cc: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Elmer C. Hodge Chief John H. Cease Chief Tommy C. Fuqua Jack L. Beville, Jr., Acting Fire Marshal Youth HAV ~~~ Helping girls find their way home. M E M O R A N D U M T0: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Board of Supervisors ~~;~~~Y 1 FROM: Beverly T. Waldo, Director, Youth Haven II~ DATE: September 23, 1991 RE: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation w'~t ~ It is with pleasure that I forward to you our Youth Haven II Program Evaluation Report for the first 3 years of operation. In this you will see that we have exceeded our program goals. Many people have worked very hard to accomplish these very fine results and we are all very proud of a job well done. We hope that you will find this Report informative. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel free to call me at 563-4475. BTW/krf Enclosure cc: John Chambliss 5929 Cove Road, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (703) 563-4475 O~p OAry~kf ~, .I~ ~A 2 Jj d 1818 LVY/C C%vE.4N5 ~ EX/T . ~'~ ~ \ ~ t .- _- 'l~4` 1 f I ~ GLEN VAR MEK,HT$ ~ ~ •~a}~ ~ ~ ~ ( r ~~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ fCRF]SN~ ~ ... 1 VICINITY MAP vJ // /~ . l ~.t_ V 1VORTB __ .. .. __ z _ .___...._.~.._ ___.__. __ _ ~ ~ ~ __ OF -__~_ PROPERTY PORN ~ ~ ROGER E. RARDIN C~~ ~ 1 1 o TAX N0. 65.00-02-53 ~ ~~ . W p,TER R N n- a D.B. 1069, PG. 809 40 SE W ` wE ~ ( N~TAR ~ ~ ~ T1E OC;` ' j SA MEN ~r - ~ S 32'30 E ASE o _ ~ ~ ct N~ N ~ } • J 38.1 PROPERTY OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `D o N . VARIABLE WIDTH ' ~ 0O `" ~ TEMPORARY CONST~ CAROLYN C. JAY ~ ~ ~ EASEMENT -~ ~, TAX N0. 64.02-01-57 ~ ~~ ' I W.B. 44, PG. 911 ~ ~ ~ 64.54 SEE NOTES 3 & 4 ---------- --- ~p pIN ~~.,_. ~S g253': - ~~ss ~ S 87'23' 40" W 213. 324.55' uj, _ PROPOSED MANHOLE #120 pI ~ ~ o PROPOSE. )3'24" W - N 10'26 54 W ' ~ ~ z ~. p ~ ~ J ~ rn°, F , TOTAL 66.87 ' p ~ °' N H OM E 'c ~ ~ , os - 3 TAX t o W f~ ~ m D.BI PROPERTY OF °. a°, a; i CANAAN LAND COMPANY ~ ~ TAX N0. 64.02-01- 21 ~ D.B. 1326, FG. 900 SEE NOT_ b , ' _-- - RnA";EKE RIB -~ OF WATER- GEOR~ 30' PRESCRIPTi~E--~~ ~ !~ ~~ T~`~ _ l ACQUISITION OF TWO PROPERTIES FROM CANAAN LAND BNGINBBRING COMPANY ~ ROANp~ O F Z A ~ ~ / ALldMfgICA CITY ~~ 18 E50 $8 1979 1989 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ Aeeauti/uleeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVEN A. MCGRAW, CHAIRMAN GTAWElA MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE VINTON MAGLSTERW. DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERUL DISTRICT October 2 2 , 19 91 HowNS MAGOisTERiAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS GVE SPRING MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT Mr. Ted Edlich, Executive Director Total Action Against Poverty P. O. Box 2868 Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 Dear Ted: I received your letter requesting an emergency allocation of $10,000 for the Transitional Living Center. As we discussed on the phone last week, it is my understanding that this would be in addition to the $15,000 that is already in this year's County budget for that facility. I plan to take the request to the Board of Supervisors at their November 19 meeting. By that time, we will have the results of the 1990-91 fiscal year audit. I will recommend to the Board that your request be approved. In the past the Board has been very supportive of TAP and TLC in particular, and I expect that they will be so this time. I am sorry that I cannot take this to the Board sooner, but there is only one Board meeting in November, so the 19th will be the earliest that it can be considered. Please let me know if I may be of further assistance. Very truly yo~r)s, n ~/ ~~c/ ~wui Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ECH/meh cc - Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk, Board of Supervisors Ms. Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Department Ms. Reta R. Busher, Director, Management and Budget Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2004 a W We, the Cit~ light at the , our opinion Because of situation. ' ~~~~~I not solve the pronrem. ,, ),:_ 1 9 petition t:he City of Roanoke to install a traffic Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is onger die 3rd on a waiting list:, waiting for funds. Peters Creek Road, this has become ~~ hazardous ~n duty at certain tunes is apl~r~~~ci<rt:ed, but does Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Adrninistration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and yarnes on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and sc:t7ools' fields. Northside High School audii:orium is rented to civic, groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a Irriority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter 1:his tame. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME _ ADDREc~ -----_ tea- PIIOfJE N0. _ ~- 10.3 ~ ~ti , ~ ; ~, :~-: ; ~ ~ ~ .~ ---- ~. •T - "~' -- - ~~,, ~~ f-' }C_ - ___,~:il~~ ~c1Llr<,c ~~~~ _/v~,~1,' , ~~~~7u~1^1s-°f_(,<i.<<x~~l~?1 ~~_ -`~~~~;:) -_~~~ ~ ~~ _, , _ _ _ - 1~ ~ ` - ,1/~~-~ ant ~_.~~ ~ -!~ ~~ / ~-Q~~1(.,Q ( DO `i ~ ~ ~.:r/:~..~' (_.C.. ~)~~v~r; _. - .V ~ ~ %~D/~ ,: ~~~1v=7~ DO --- - ~ _ - ..r ~~; .555'</~~~ ~,/~~ ~,~ ~ - S S -- -; • ~ - _- " _ -. ~~C~eu G~^ - _ 36 a.- 40 ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~-~Q Val` ~.~1 ~ I ~ -- ~ a~r~~ ~ ~ a ~~~ -- . - --- _l -- --- - - - ,' - ~ ~ ~._~~~~~~~ .~~ ` \ ~ ~Q ~ ~ _ ~ _~'C _.~~'?!~ _...ss._L? L~. -'~ ` -=-~_- 'mil ~ j , - L>~_ -- t `~~ _ (1/` a.`~,~?~k- ----- Co ~-_11.__ -~~-,q>?.,M yea ~ P_ ~o ~. ~~,k o- c~_'f ° _~1. ~ (p ~ -~ `~~ < We, the Citizens of Roanoke Ualley, petit.ion i:hc~ City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road ar-d Northside Hiyh Sr.hool Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. [3ecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at: certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersect-ion serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' /ldministration office and Roanoke County Safety [3uilding, as well as student,, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road. Also using Northside ffigh School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. N E DDRESS _ __-__ PfIONE NU. -._ - • r r * a~cl _ 7 o b C o ~ e__ ~_ '~ I_~__ ~' `f o l ~----------- - ---5 _!~_? • ~ r ~S = ~- r- :cam ~Qr~x~ a h I °I a ~ne'l~ ~9 • Cc~~~~- ~b _--3° ~-~a.3 ~ - _ . - ~ ~ - -- l~ ~ i/ __-__ T --~---- - _ i 7 ~7 c~-ee/ _~-~ ~~l Z_ j1J_-c1z_~_~~y.<:z - -- I~ r _lU~J C c~~r,,a_/~? (/~_2_~~ t< We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has herrnne a hazardous situation. having a crossing guard on duty at: certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exiE pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1f00. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Hiyh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and Barnes on the Roanoke County Parks 8. Recreation fields and schools' fields. Nor•tttside Iliyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS P(iONE N0. --- -- 32t _ ~~~=~~-tom ---------------------------- ..__ _ ~S Ste- ~e asoQ('h_,a..e-~_c~ • ~6s --~ SFS ~ - ~-- ' 11 --- _ ~~ ~~ tti~~--~---- ---~~--~ ---- ~zZ ---`~- __ ~ _35~- -- -- ~- -- - _`~~~n X33 B _~ 5~~.------------ 5~.3- ~ ~ ~ ~ `~a _ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ L~, _ ~~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, wailing for funds. E3ecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety (;uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road. Also using Northside 11igh School Road are families going to practice and games orr the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Iliyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. ADI)RFSS I'IlONF N(l. _ ...~cY~/~ ~U O `7 36~ -F~3 ~ 1 j ~3~ sivJ ~F5- r~Zo -------~z-~~io _ ~ . /A I/'N3.Yr.In,~l rn, ~ ~ n `Y !UI ~v,Q_ ~--Ca r~ - - -~_~ ~_=.. 7`f ~.. ('rrcc ,~, y 3a_2 - -i_ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ v.i.c~ w -~~ --- 3~' ~_~1~~-- 3 ~, ~-s3/' ?J~ .. We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, wait;ing for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve t(~e problem. besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iligh Sc(rool Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Higlr School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a (rriority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. N ME ADDRESS _ __ ('IIONE N0. _ ~S"~ ~ __ SG ~ -a a 3 ~ o.a ~ ~ I c3.4 ~~~e.~.-C-.~~,__~ ~ _ ~~.~~5~~ t3. ?ov9 i ' ---~5~3 -~5-~31 ~~ c~ T, - ~. R n _ ~ !~_3~ a 3-_~-. _ l~lfo S 7 ~ ~ 3 co~(.a-~. ~ t~ ~- _ _~ ~~ - ..~ ~- Z ~.. ~.. o (~-~-~.s --7 ~ ~ 3 C~d-~. ~~ ~- ------- ---~~v a-34 ~ a- Zc~3 --~ •-- -- - -~° 1-QZ~-7_~ ~1~ ~L1- l DI1._G~ Lb~-~'------------ ~ ~8 ~S yC.~. Y?t.cJ _ --- ------------- S G 3- 1 p 7a _ _ ~ ~~ ~9 ~ q .-~ d~ ~ ~ Sa.1 ~.,.L, -38 ~ ~ a `7 ,6 ~rii - _ ~r~_t~__ _5~~=/s~~ .- . _ ~ S ~"' ~ Co ~~~Gl/ -- -- - SCOrT~~ ~i a ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ --- V `L' -------- -- ---mow`-"5 l'-°'L_.~ ~ `~~ / / __ ~~-~,d~d~~~L._ a ~i~t,~ V ~t -- --~-~a-~L ~ I ~~ - _ _ ~.~ . ~-f 6 3 O Cj ~y?~fc,~,~~ o t_.1G'Y{ ~-J i ~ ~iai-f9'Q~'i., V ~. __ _ G _ ~~_-..~ ~P Cy O -- We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME _ _ ADDRESS __ PHONE N0. _ ~/~.,.~, -l,~lr,~ k'/off c:~.lo% 07 .7~G 70~ 7 We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside liigh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS _ PHONE N0. ~ -~ ~2, _ -- ~34a _~~,~.~ ~ ;~ 111. ~~~,~,~ ~~~G..1- ~~'~3 --- \ ~ --7 r l ~ ' - ~ 2 -- - - ~~'(tz~~-~ >,~~ d-1G~!/` SC(YP 1 ]N JCB/O~Y ~/~trcij-y ~i~~?~J~~1~~---~:~°i~ I~S1~"l) We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. tt is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3r•d on a waiting list, waiting for funds. 4 Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain tunes is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a clay care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and dames on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. _~ NAME ADDRESS P110NE N0. --- J__~_.~' 2(o Z 36 ~__~~a b __ ~(~ 3 -~C~C~~ • ~~~/S~ - ._.~ t~S-_-~73 ~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iligh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain tunes is apprer.iat:ecl, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety E3uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and c~anu~s on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Hiyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a irriority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS ________-__---------_--_-- PIIONE N0.__-_. ` ~ - - ~L 2 -- c ~/v ~' ~ Lt ~ -0 ~--~s- ~~ 7 ~-- ~---- ~ --------- -- - - ------------ _~,~~~ ,. .-- ~= 31.E _ ~; ~-~~~ ~G6~ ~60~ ---3 ~~ ~~ S~_~c~~2 y ~-~ 3b~G-e~zi~~ !. ~/ K.d~si c7VJ{'/1~¢..~ X01 2.6 ~A'K. /~_ c~ - -_~~Z~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition 1.he City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside 11igh School Road. It is our opinion that t:his issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at: certain tunes is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside high School Road. Also using Northside Fliyh School Road are families going to practice and dames on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic yroups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this i;ime. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PRONE N0. 3 d3 l~ ~e~~.~-l--r s62 -i~.3~ » ~ ~-. Swri,~~ ~ 9~G ~-s~/~.e.eS~~e~ ~r ~~~s /)'1~~~~T ~~rPl~~Co) Q=cU~~C ~ ~!7 U ~ s~ ~'Urse~ri~~ lac -___ ~_~,.__~/~ _~ YO! 9 __ 3 6 G - Y s S7 ~ - - e~~ --L3 33 ~!~~~ ~Gc,~--.'P~!ri)/~--L(/~-_____a~l `~ 5~3-S14r _ _ ~ ~--Icy ~~--~__ _ ,~ --- ----U~ ~?~c~~ ~----_7_~_~~~a ~ ~_ ~ __~~ .__l~~U~_ Z'~~-~------------366 --,s7,~~ -- ---- - _ _ _- ___ _ - ___ _ -------~~~. - --- __ . . /~~ __ _ _ ~ ._ ~ _ D/~ __ _ __ ~.7~~-.D ~7~~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside high School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. + because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Haviny a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke ' County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, ' and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tune. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PIIONE N0. .~~~~' ---~,~~_~~~1~Uk-ter ~~; _?l~ ~ ~1l ~l _~_ - j`~` ~ r `1_ ~~~ 11-11inn~ S Q-I 2. BBB[ 1511- la . OUdYLGtGt, ~_2y~ 2l __ -----2~7~~y~- ~i .. ~ .. .:'vr,v- ., .'7 - .~;~~. ~-5..~-u .,lr~{~f~p~±~~w^, .crR~(r,}~9!'~717'~•Tn ce~1 ~~~~t `c~r~T~•rL.At1`7 ^".',If ~1')Y?:. ~'~i.~; tiT,, 1. .!'~, ~i ~~ t~~r'.! We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic ]fight at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3r°d on a waiting list, waiting for funds. - ~ Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous ~ ~ situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road. Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to pr•actic;e and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Niyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not consicierecf a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. i NAME ADDRESS f I l(JNE N0. ~ ~ a~, .,, ~ ~ ~~-~ -- - - -- _ _. 11 . _ • r, _, --- /~-~) X21+ ~ ~~~- -`' 6 .z . ~~ 3 /3 ---- ~~ ... ., ~~•.:v v.*u~~. ~.~..: .. -~. ice., •r•.,. , ..;y~•r+:'-a,^m~-:r~1~-n~orewr. .¢^.v~ ztr-r71^•^:7~~,jr ~.v: T,*„1.r1 •n rt,n^.-1.-^tr!!7^.'.I~r .~..Th:..~ ~ r• t~fr,~ -Y ~ ~ i r~ ..~4Rt~^.4 `, .. We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous ~ situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600, There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going t.o practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Iliyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. ~I AME _ ADDRESS _______ _______ PIIONE NO____ _. ~-- ~ - ~~ ~~ . ~----- ._ , -4:~~ ') /7 ~ ' _ // y-/~.~~iLLLYZ~:ILU~ ~ ~~' ,,~!s~--- --s,.3r~ll =1~t-~?_~ - .• f ~ ~- - - ___ - - -- -~-- i ' ~ „q~fr1,V ., ,d .'' ,'dr'y:. ,~•'fY~ t''~v4!2RR!",!t;, ;i?"4;Rr~~~Y.Y.&^L"!A'rlvy^~,ft;n•,k ,rs,~, Y •Tr•;,;: li;•. , i ~~rlr K.- ~ 'SiIS(t, !. .r... i P 'F4L'$, . 1•i 1 '', '"i: ' is a. 't We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke ' County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practir,e and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a I~riority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. _-- NAME_ ____ A[)DRESS ___-- _ f'110fJE NO _ _ -- . n ~ ( _~ ~~QC~~. ~_l~rr_.2~~ ~ ~ CCl.il-x`l~~f~ ~CL~r-{mil ~f~E:~ ~~~ . -- ----- ~-~'~.=~~:j~J ~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ _ 5~ ~ ~ - ~~~ n ~_S~_~IL7L ~._.. ~ ~~ Y~'17~j f 1~~ ~/1i2,{,Jlr ~~ir"- _ ,~,7 _(~ ~.~_~._.- ~ ~r ---- ~>oG~,~ ~__ _ _ ~ . ~~ ~ i c ~ ~, ---__ ~~- •, - ~ ,a _ • __ /Q 3 Noll ~ A_v_c~~ ,ti : (ZV ~N a k-e +U~ _ _ ___ ~5 `-~ Z - S~ U . ~ .~--R- (_.i ` `~ 1?-~4_. ~ __ 7 / ~ ~~. C~La- ~- d? ~ . ~~~Co...l, ~ V"%1--- _ _ _ 3_ Y `~ __ (r SO l 'Q1t .0 Aa•• ,L i rJ {~-('I g~ .9.1 ~~~/~ [ 1Ef 1\ 1JaE~ / ~! ~a ~_P rr, l~~- ---- ----- -~~_'1 ~~ '~~ ~Y-~~.-1'.+-~o.N- ~-~r~ ~.iX.~... Val Zs1t~ 1<? ~'/ "7 ~' I Z<~ ~a-_V~ ,, - - -------.a~~~~ •, T„ a.- c ~ , i r,~ 1' ' ----1 ----- ., ,, !t'RYf,a.~ ~ ~' -+""' ',!;~. „F t!(.", .,~''~IE°S~'~, .g7"y• 1:5 ~) 7. j n ~~~,,,.~~ 1. '? .1+. - • :' r~ .r, .r.. +. ,; T 1.. {S•".^' .r .; }~- ~ n .'.~%r `iP ;7i'S@'TK•5t~. .~,.?y,;• i'f• R; .'~'. ,..,?eA +'. , t' (f' We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside fiiglr School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. a fiecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Nor~t~rside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. _ NAME ADDRESS __ PHO~JE N0. __ ~~~ _.. ~~~tia~_ F~ 11 ~v y~-r--- -~_-~~~ ~~~- -- ~~~. > ~_i;~~-_- ~)Q, .: G,,,,.n-~~ Jul ~ ~'~~,~a.~.o ~~.~ . `~n~,v~,r~~o Vii `>Cr~~~1 ~~~~~~ ~/ IG.. M-s~~~~s~~-t,~~-~% ~tlp4' U Gy', ~cv~o,f../~/_ ,.~a~C,2~~m.i ~''~c'J --.~~r,~ ~, . 2-~ ~, g y _q - - f6~~~.- y > -L/----- f~Y{~~L>~v~,.~~ ','~Z~~'~~t~! _S':3~Y ~Lir~r~~r~~L CAL.'' ,/l'~Lc~ ~l'~ ~I~ ~- ---- - ~' ~~ '~ ° ~-~ ~ -+- ; ~~Q~ r o_ 6 a 1 fL? '7'x'7 /)~? ~~~ ,n !./ ~~, _ _ ' \>, ~~-7 ,._ _ ~ ~.. ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ C~~~ . +,, ,~~'9-1831 ___~~- ,~-_a~.~3 ~~~._ll~..l • e' _ _ ~1~}!-'(>~f'1~ - ,u~ti, ~?c.~L~ ~ ~=c~/SCjr' ,=}i rL'F f~~F ~~/~ - _-~~,._~^ ~.~~ :~~ We, the Citizer.~ of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iliyh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but: does not solve the problem. [iesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety building, as well as students, parents and staff of a clay care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1f00. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families goiny to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS I'IIONE N0. --- -- ---~-' ~r<h ~ 1 ~'~ ~ .t'~ t~ r o~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,t l 1 ~r~ , ~ 1~l i; ~ ' ~ ~i, ~ . i _~ (•, S ((.!,:;~< ~ ) -- --~-j / c~-~f ~ -- / 7 Y.~~~`~{, ~/ly.~,. ~~•Cir tt, ~ J //7'~Cct?.G -,- ---~~~_G`__ ~ ~il ~ ~ - -- -' /'~- J (' J- -- - /- 'r, _`/~1_~,~Z~ ~ ~ / "'n ~ i \..~ti(1y - J ~ J ~= Y_~) r . 1i> t-~rv . ~'~ ~ 1 ~''~. __ s\%~`~_~`~! i_ ` > ~~ ~;~ __~ ~ ~ I,.,2 -- -~a~,..-~~ii _ `-~ ~ I ~ "7~.e~1'r~.~.~.~ ~e.a~__t~~.~~z!~lZs?,~c_~ ~ ~-{v I'+ ____ ~~L- `-?-~~~ - ~ 7 - - ,, [t - r ~ ._._ / ~_~~~~r~~1~r'>^~(~3/ CICr--Sk^'~ /~U~~ /.C'r'lavJ`"c`-~_t f~ ~ /% ~ 7c/ _ :~rJ J-~.~ ~)- 1 M -- - - --- -- - __ _ _n --- (i L..~U,L ~_- a 1 ~`~ ~vrt~~' Crf'. U,~1~~,. l1~? ~ U' ~~' ~ /L~ rK~ ~[./ f ~ _"~_"~`~ ~- ~ - ~~~.~ .l'f G_~1~ moo. i3v ' ' ~1 ~ ~r~~~~ ~- ~~~~;>1~'----- _ - `~:' L-r--:~~~~/ /7 7 /, .i j 7n / y/.-, , .. L..'L~/ -/ f~+ =a ~-~~-- /lJC/1 A/f~~~TiC; ~~7II~. r7..ll_l.~ i ( .r i > i '~- ~ ,~ i /:i~ ~ i ~ 7r - 5 ~ ~_~ ~-.._ s-_.--_. _ _ _..__s.-~ ~_~:. j 1~- ~~ 3 ,~ - - , ~'.,.~ ~ .,~~ uL - ~ D ~ LO ~F~~~'.. 4~ ~ J~- ~IUC..V-f~\C~ Y ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~-~~_ ~ `~ Cad I •J l - - _~.°~~.n`k.1~u., S50~~t~'Ir..e~?~ R~ ~~-.r`~-.____~~~~_4J~___ 3~~Z.a_~.~3 f ,~ p ._.1 ~ (9'f~'-LPL: ~rl 'ter r d ~~r~1/Ll.l-~C~~.Q~ ~I~~t-~,^ 2 9,) L~.tt'7t.E:JL~ r J ~ j U /~/~ r 11._~ r..r~ ; 7:l ~~~~~~'~ ~(,~/~19.L~1't,~ ~~,j~~~c~'C"/C 71~7~1G r)tc'~-~j~C,+'~`C ~,~~ c ~~t~ r i 'j t' :~ - ...'`j~!i _ .. ( ._ _~x.~ ~; ~>rz.+ esq. i c.r!'1! ., ~' `~ Z./ (~ App, n~ s~?cx~ ~i- ~ c4-' u-l'~_ ~`r~ ~ I `r ~~ ~ ` ~ -G 3 --->_- > --~ -- --~----~_ __~-~-y 5 ~~P.Mr:J r+ i ~ ~ I,r' ~ .~fi Pp. ~,L+'t~!fi M' P .I .r 1j:T Y ,~ .t~~ :T •:.. ,t-.~ `~,r'%• ril' r vl~r K "a'Yi "I'~yTfr j-~~. ... ~ ~ / .. I.~.L'.i ..~ r G~' ~r ~r•- It t. .vl, i .~'t. ~. l~l ~~ .. ~ .k .t '.. We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic • light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside high School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waitiny list, waitiny for funds. ~ Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety BLilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks 8. Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creatiny additional traffic. _ ~i We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAh1E _ ADDRESS __ N ci -_~'~- "`-`gy`p'- __-~? l --- ~.'~" ` ,''~ c~_~r .=` .y J / ~ v /,G~4;,Cj•(,G~ ~~r~J _ ,~1, dU ' ~7IZ ~~CCCG~2G'CG~ 4'~CC ~Q,"G~ ~~!~' ~c,~C/V Z. c_sL . 7nU ~~~ X_~L___ ~' Cc.~ ~ /i J ~ - C .~ cr_~__t~"__~~t1l.t\~~R- _ ~3~=2~ \~t.~c'~. ~~1tit 't-:~~ ,~ -~ ~ ~. / ~ 14 u__ ~ , , t ~~ .•r .., a ~~ /]fi.~ r .:1 . (.~., .n, l ~t ~J7 ~~.. ~ r J c! / ~ /~C, _---- _PIIONE NO__-- _ ~ ~/ r' ~ :S ~~' ~~ 1, Vr, ~t~ia~ _ -J~~.~ _,~~y~~~,3~~~ ~ T------------- l -- -- -_---- 1 --- - - ~~ - ~ ) f /~ v~ ~ ~ _v ~ 3'{3_`r~'u1o ~- 5ys~ // ,. / -- ax' v ~- ~ ~ ~,~,tq~ ~-r~ ~~ ~~~,~ r -r,}, 'L@ ~`ar. ~;~^~ :Y:rrm M.^. t' ]~"' i r. ;r~i I~. ,i ,+ ;t We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to practice and Barnes on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditor°iurn is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the (natter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAM~_- L'-- v- ?-.,~,'~ ~, ~~~s ~,~~ _~ ~h~(~ n~, _ ADDRESS _ _ PHONE N0. 7 ~ i -~~=- -~-- t-- - ------- ;, ~-~- ,~ _ ~3 ~(' ~~ ~,~~ -~~~ ~---- - I1 ~AKL N ~ 1 t ~ `\ 1C"t \. , r~ Il 1"~ ~1 ^l~ -~E ~ ~, Q ICJn Y(l ': ~fl (~17 i~l ,~c,~r - ~t ~ boa ~ ~~i~ 9~~_s~,~ ~~ v ~1~ V ~ ~ , Yf[_~~/ ~ ~_ ~ / ~ ~~~L.~. ~~Za_.~_. ]L2 ~ __-~ ` LI '_I _._ __._.__ _--..__ ~J~.1~ I t~C_~~`J Z , - ~ ~D ` ~ ~~. ~ X'~S~- 1~ T ( ~j~~=~ -mil/[> ~~ _ ~" ~ ~~~~c 19l ~ Vic! J'h-~ ~~,-~ s~,~ U ~?~~-i ~=~~---- .~~~ ; ~> ~~ ~--- .~~1. ~ ~c I -?QL L~-~ ~.~ ~ S'r- ~ o_s~+~.flY+~~ V a Z_~s] i l b z - ~ 8b5 ~ , '.' , ' ~' ,~ ~ ~,~cz3~ /Tl ~ Gh Ci.~, .a/~~/7 .~~~~ ~~>'~~~/ a.Cl/~-/1 ct.a/~c/~(3/ G~tJSe. 171.E OCtnGift l _' -----~---__-- ~----- -._-__1__..~------- --___ ------- ~------ - _ _ - - - - - -- --_-~` __. We, the Citizers of Qoanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High Sciiooi Road. Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. 7 NAMF ADDRESS PHONE N0. . ~ i We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic II light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside I1igh School Road. 1t is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, ~~faiting for funds. { Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous _ ~ situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the probl ern. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tine. An ex{~edient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. - -, ~; ,;ti ~; i 3 L .~ y ~o ~~~.~~<~~~s~ ~ , ~~ ~ ,2~z=~~,~ ------ ~~~ti_ ~~=:- ~ f ~ = s ~ s--- -- ~ -- -a-------------- ----__ - ,, -- - . c ,~ - r `J -_._-~ S ~-1 ~-r•-! c l~c,fi _~ / ~n ~~-GsJS' c-~„t-~~,~ ~y _~ ~~!t~1L~° _ ~ ~l~ ~' -] J ~", c~ _ --- "- _ ~ - ~ ~ 'r_ --/ - - -1-/ ~- ~ / - ' --- - ---~. -~?cr~-_~ ~~ _~-~~.•~.~-L-~~- - ~ ~ - -------- - -- --- - >L/~'i [~ i /-~- a,~ t S/e ,~ ~ /~ 0 ~ ; ~+ '~ 7i e.a ~` ~ ~ S~~> U`.~ ~~ y~ ,; ~; t~~r1 Y 3 ~. -- _-------1_/ -~-=- -~---~ -=----- ~-~- ------- -_----- t?`~=-~ -- - _ ~- , - --- _ ---- ---j-- ~"--Y rvM_-L£~tN--------_-_--_. G ~_~Lufi"_f_ r i'~ /~?- -k°!`~!'~`'~ ~ f1< .'i'~!S '~'''~ 1a /C).- f!~?Ci (fJfC.(~O'~ ZGi JIVt'//aN(~ J1 ~~olnJt"rNG"ZEN WV ZJ ?(''~ r- c~J G ~ --- -- Y~ - -- ----- y----- --- _._ --- ----- / -- ---- ---- L '~, 7 _ i - - " ~ _. ~~ ~ ~ , ---- - - ~ ' _ 6~' - _. - - --- ~ ~ - - ----- ---- ~ ~' . - -- ---__ --L ._. __ ___ a t A-_ _ _ __ J - - _ - ` _ ,fir, / ~_~ ~ ~_ r /~ J .SC~1 G Lr/iCjc d - / t--'~7/'/=~~-~v ~-..r-`//J,l----~ ^` ~' ~-`-'=='G+ k' y~C~ri(1>~/-~ --- ~ z~'~C) ~ c~ ~~~~i~ ~. lt~Cxr_~_~1 C~~-f~~ /'~/ ~rc~s~_y__ 3~~1~a ti-~~>~lo titi-yv L^r-t,- ~ ~~ i~?/DC~~~ ~ ~ ~^'~'~--- 'ter'? /~iS~> - - ~ -; r , __ -- - -- --__ - -~ , ,, ~u U) ~ti~~ 2SSrl ~~~•1~.. /~"'- ~ w rcr:~„,. ,( ~`/~-- - -~17a 321" c~__ ~ _ ~ ---~------ -- -----------~ --~-~----= ---- ----==------~ .. .~'~vr.v... - .. .. ,.. n r ~k~'rtvtn!^o~!^~c!^•• '..i/,. ,S.R`t~~ ~..~"A^ a R:Fr<n*~.K..,!1' 1`ly'i..'d, ~ r. ~in,:P~/~ ;i r~'J'.ti ... ';~~r i J • , ,~1 ~ v ~..,~,~. q~ j~i,~sso~Jr~ ~~- C. ~ ~,~ ; T o y C~~~~%'~ iii /~ ~ ~ fr! Jll~ r_' '~ ;4 ~ ~~'~~..~ ._.___ -_..L__- ~~..** ~- --_-__l 2 ~ ~~ - __-_4r~~t Z~ ~ ~3 ~ ----- Paz ~ ~ ~ y'y ---- --_-``4~4n- /l~)G7~ c.~ ~C~11>J-~~ ~~ ~ ~~ /' ~--- oZ~-.~ ,,' ~c~Cz- e GAT ~ ~/i ~: ~~ / ~< --0~ i ~' ~------- ,~. ~~- ~ ~'Tr i ~ t~ _ ~ ~ ~,~~ 1.,~,1so~ ZSI ~ ~ - i I ~ i r'on ~~ 30 ~ e.dr ~ ~ e lc~ ~ . --------- `7 `la` - - o~ 3 • ?~ r2~~ I ~ ~ / O Y i4~~-J i ~J~-- ~~V • ~~A tr 01~:~ ~ ~1 _ _ 7 ~ `f - ~.~ ~ _ + 1 ~ + r "-~ ~ v' C .J7L~(•~--1L~1/G~/}~ '~V .1 L/.--- I ~~--a V ~t ./ ' f ~ 055 C.~~f~...~~ 12 7. Z ya/~?~ -7l Z _ ~~,9~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ?/J tau ~J ~~10~~ ~/t~~! ~" ~ ;~ ~~ % y'r CvL~~ /~~ (~~_ ~~~`~ - `~l ~`/ ~ - ~~ 1 ~ Z t_ ~ ,, )~ ~ J c /l//~,l ~ ~ ~ - ~'c s ~_~1.-:/_ '/r '~ ` C~~ ~ . /fir ~~ Y 1. ? _ ~ - - / ~i > ~" ~ e Y~ ~~ ~ ~ ~s3 ~'4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ r~~- , ~ r 1 7__ ~ I 3~_ - --~- ----- ~ ~-~ 7 - 1 -~ J _..~..-_-.- ~J _;, / ! ~~ (" - 7 cQ.v (.. ~~~ _ ; ~ (5 ~ J a. =fit. 2 c ^ ~- ~ . ~' ~~ ~., n I;O li /J ,~ ~{ a ~ ~ ~~'~: 3- s-~k..r ,~_ • 5~3 l.. ~ ~-~ ~; G~~ ~~-~ , ~~ l~ .~~~>~ ~ 7T y-i~y~ ~. _. , ~. - .- Form .41-1II ~~~ ~I '~`- (-O1'111 Z11~-1£3 - __-^ T We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road anc! Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd an a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerf:ain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks ~ Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS /„ c o S ABLE ~~ V ENE N0. s~ /- flo qJ rave ~ . iv+e~5e~n CaS! IV4~~~_ft,0 ~r • ,r,,.~ Va sC91-gly '~~' .~ ' ~~1''' f~;, ,~ _ , ~ ,~d~,, We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to inst;all a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is nur nnininn that 1hi~ issllP f.an no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' 1ldministration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road. 111 so usiny Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside high School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt at:tention be givenrto the matter this time. 11n expedient resolution would be appreciated. ninn~r nnnRf= ss PHONE N0. J t~l- r1 ~' ~~,Itit~ c% ~` j r~ _ Q~IJ~ r A. l ~ IC-T('~' ` V ~~ l __ _ _ 5~ ~,7 ~ "" ~ 3 / ,~ ~~ !l r We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition t:he City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Qecause of t:he increased traffic nn Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. [iesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke Couni:y Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of• approximately 1600. 1-here is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke Country Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before arJ not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. nnnrirrr r~{~"N1" Nl/. y r We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition t;he City of Roanoke to install a traffic light; at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Qecause of the increased traffic on Petters Creek Road, t;his has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. [3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Quilling, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and t:wo schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. 1-here is also a church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside high School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. _-__~~.'~.C.1- ~-~j~y~~. X1-1 `'7~'t f`~ 6Y`.-C~ Is/'..~r--~ T]r-- 7 ~ ~ - -,G ~ .1 -~~--~ - ~~~ a -s~ ~-- -- ~` ., ~_& ~_ ,~~ ~~ ~~. ~„ 1 L \f '4 +~ i ,~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS __ PHONE N0. t ~,.~ j _ > I ~~ 7 ~ ~ - . C.z3% -~ (_ f l_ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition~tfie Cit:y of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iliyh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. E3ecause of the increased traffic nn Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. t3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety [3uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an enttrance off Northside iliyh School Road. Also using Northside Hiyh School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0._ .j , -- l~ ~~w ~ ~ ' ,.. ~ ~, ~- ~ ` b . /fit ,;~ ~ • ~- !_J--- ___.___- ~1 1 r A f' -_ ~ }f,~~ ~ i ~'~i' ;,~~-! ~~E ~, G r i=-- r~. 1 - ~iir,. ~~ ~ ~.t ' -Y_."_-~-- _. /. ~~ l ~ i 1 _,,, r ~>,. - '?.' r _ -~ f ~ .. ( ~ •~ 1~ . l ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ` ___ f ~ ~ ~ %; ;~. ~ ,, (i ( ~ -- -, , . ~ r ;, ~~ ~ , irk ~ ! (, ~. ~f ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ -- ~ ---- ~, --, .~ ~ ~ , w , __._ _~ i ~' G~ ~ ~" 1 ~~r" A A ~ kI f . _ _ T / ~ l! ~ ~ f ,1 j i, ' ,~ ~ ,i r ~i' ~~,- ~ ~_ u ~ ~~ ~ ~>>~ , a i ~~.~ ~, -~~ ~ ~ ago ,~ ~~~, ~ /e 7~ ~ys' '~.3 .~G~~~ c ~-~ r. i We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of i:he increased traffic on Petters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. having a crossing guard on duty at; cr.rtain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit; pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parentis and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on t:he Roanoke Count;y Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Hiyh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be a~~preciated. NAMC AdDRESS t ~~ '~~~((>~C~ PHONE N0. _ ~ ( _ r_.~ _ ~. ~. / y ~, ' ~f.) ~r 1 ,1 . . _, r _.' L ~ ~~'r °.Jf~cL '~Xfj1lg~~fi1 I! U/D~~ 4"c'~F'.~ ~.r.I~' %c'.•~;:C L~r G~!/~ "~: ~~, ~ j ~ ~ ~ / ,..1 ! !~, a t'~l ~ ~. ~ ( . J1 / ~ Y --- 1. ~ \i r~ ~ ,. '; ~1,, l ~.~ ~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Ct°eek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' AdministraY,ion office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families, going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tlnle. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS ___ _ _,_PFIONE N0. ~~nn~ - . ~kWt. -~Y'i+~-V~~~Si~1~' ~ '1?:~~.\'~~S+a_~~' crr~r_~'`,~},1, , ~:,,, `'i ~ ~y ., ~~ s .~i ~~ (ti/ ' .~ --~ ~ r v`_' /r UC J ~ ~1~/S r1~ r~. ,s 2 5 L.. A ~'~~ ,(11 ~ ` ~ I/~ ----- ' l~ 7 - o c ~~~ ,~,,. S 21 it W ~ ~L (' E:~ ~1 L ~°.-- ~1 S~"_.. __---- ~~ y,~ - r~ G'J~~ ~ ~ ~ ~IYA i~w~~r~+,~ _ ~~2~ 895 3 ,- !1 ~ i ~, . ~~_~' g ~ G z- S" f~ Y z `' ' l ~ _z_ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd an a waiting list, waiting far funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cert:ain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families. going to practic? and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Nigh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ____~_ ~~ C ~ ~~ ~ ~~ _~'N i stn ~ ri•-i _ ~: /~ ~.~.,~~__r..c4- /~ ~1 ~-d c,;~,ckx~ E .`i~~ ~1--~~ ~ " .~ ~~ n. 7 ..._%? .c+ ~'~ ~r) ~' __---- A~- r' r~ __ PIIONE N0. j~~~~J(_ [ ~ ~~ '_i ., .> `1,- L~ ~ ~ ~ "L~ _..~~i_ ~~ ~,_ ___~5~~ -a yes ~~ ^i•" ~ J r~ X3/3 ~~~:~~ ,~.~~ t ~~_- _~ ~~, ~- ~~~:~z !! nn ADDRESS _ S~ -3~ ~ .,.J ~ {..~,-...~ ,~. i ) /~ ~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety~Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families. going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME _ _ l ~ - --- ~. '~ ~ >:~. G~~'`~"~ ,~ ~ t,.;,, `r ~rt h.te- t/' ./ 7 ` ~ .~ 91.~-~-~ ,~~ ~, !) ~,r,~ ~,,, ,- ,~{. ryv /~ r ~ d. l,' ~~ ADDR ESS PiIONE N0. 1 -J ~ i ~ `.J.XLti...:~ . 1_..:~..1.2_.1_~S..7L. S_~1:.---s_ : _ _'J r J~I ~...~ ~.-. \ / / ~1 ¢r {. ( - ,, ~ 4 ~, , , ~- . / <. r ' ~ 1/ r~.. s l ,~ ~ - -_._ :~ r G~~~~~ ; ,~ ~~ i t ~~ N, AMA ~~p ~ ~.-~-__..-------- --.._~`a_~~~ 1_ ~ ___~ ! ~~_.- /rte ___Y___ ~ s ./~~~ _~... _ _~1.~:_~ ~1 C,:~1 (f I l ~ {~ ~ ~i }•_~~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ !r+ ri 1 r J ~' ~ ri , ~r J /~~ > .,,~G ~ / ..,,. ., (.,. ~7c9 a'C"G',,v ~" ~oc,~0 ~:2 Y•!r!f L r". [- ~`~~?~" - ~_- -~ ~~ ..~ _' ~ / C•) ;r' (~ - - _- r~ Nl LG.`S '[1 r ~~[ ~ l .~`~./, h~~(~ -?~ ~ .'t f ~'~ ~'~~Q~~ .r'°l '`~ j ~ i ~ ~n ~ ~J 1 ,, ~ - ~(,~..~.~ ~ Ci 'k'i~(1 t_((, ,(~~~ 1 ~~,~'~~~ J~-~ ~ -~,/~.?..r ~, ~~, ~ V ~ I~~1 U ~~~' _~' ~_.L~ ~; ~~~~ ~ ~ ~=lr~~ ~lL~IJG~.~I: l }(~l .r" ,~,> l t"~ rl.~l i.° '~' i :r. %~~:"`_~C c?~~ (/=:J ~;>~i, ~y 5° / ~~~ uG ~,.lrGGtn~. 0~~~~(~; ~~~:~, (~ ~ }-- T __--- - ~ r -- - ~ I - - ~~ `}~~,~~ ~~/fit t,[!" f1 ~ !~c's_S.L r''.rd r_... .r.._.~^t r~3...i.~L-_~.___._~t•r ur!._ c~-~[/tj~1~; "~' :~. ~,r,^.~ J C r We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Quilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. ~ L _ . ~ ~+ _- .,~ ~ ~- U r4 c~ ~ Z A }} // ~D ~'v~ n P W~-ri" `` R-}G~ (A~Jr'x , , _ ~ f•. V U ~ ~ ~1C)~ ~~ IA A, C~ nti _ // ~v o ~ i~.s u.y v~ ~- ~J :~ ~S`"'7 a 7 /~~~ lv ~' ,~,~~ ~~ ~~, ~'~~` ~ , ~ ,~ nr a .S C~_~: ,/ ~~ ~. . , ati ~("IU~1~il/~ ~ ~ `~IZ.SO S TDT Ol '1 lvH ~ 1'? /r G+~ . r'`~'j''" t' 1=~1~~ J' .a • Y ?/~ - r w~ ~. ~.. e4 ..~.. ~' ~ -- ` _,_.._,~ ~~~ ~~ I<<,I ~ ~ ;.fit- , , ,~~ l v ~ ,, , .._` I >~ ~~ ;~ 1 M~ r1 ~ ~ i /.// _ r ~.r ' ~ ~~ - ~ . ~, C_G ~ r . .. .r , t" - ~ ...- ' :,~` •~.' ~ - ~- ' ~~ ~~, > ~.. ~~~~ ~- , ~~, , ~ ~~ ~~ ~ X44 ~~rr~. .~~tn~ -. a •• - 5 ~ ~~..,c, .~ ~ z - ~~~ ~ ~ .~. ... - . _, ~~ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke tc- install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Raad and Northside High School Raad. It is our opinion that this issue can rro longer be 3rd on a wa iting list, waiting far funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not salve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/ex,it pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practicf~ and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and s~chaols' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic, We are aware this issue has been addressed before and oat considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this_ time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME _„ _ _ ADDRESS ,____.___.__.___ ___. ~.____.____PiIONE N0. ~~~~ ~..., .. , i ~r ~ ~ ~~ ~ ! ,~_ ~'jR_'~~'-- ~~ ~ -- ~'~- - ------~-~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ l~" ? .. -~ ~__ We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High Sr..hool Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funeis. Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerl:ain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. aesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practir:e and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this tirne. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ~' ~~.'~~ ~:~ ~~.~ ~,~!iiZ 5 (3c(~i-1 ,,, z r,l ~l A. ~., ~. ~~~ %~ ~~ ~~ 1t~ ~ ri-Za f ~-r~ G.- ~sy r, /e' _ (, ~~. c ~ PEIONE N0. _ __ - -~~c,_~,-O~~.C~ j 1. ~ .~~~11 ~ ~~ ; -ls_~ -- _~'~_~~- ~~ 11.3 1 ~~ Q-- ~ -- ----- ? ~ ~ ,_- ~ --~- _ _ _ ~-1.~1~u__.____ ._ ` ~-~ ~" _ ~ ~' ~'n ~' ' ~-- ~. ~. We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanake t.o install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek goad, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty~at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Raad are families goiny to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Nigh School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road anti Northside Nigh School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerf;ain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety~Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families, going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. ~ `S ~ r --11JfJA 1.J~D~~Q bS~Z~. ~'~EVIL1~-~1 ~P._Nt, ~~2-g~Z7 u~ , ntiv~ r c ~. ~ 7~ `' T s 9 rv L- ~ ~-e ~S < <v ~~ L v i .~ 6 :~-~ry~7 bJe, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke tri install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is or.ir opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. [iecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has heconu~ a hazardous situation. Having a crossiny guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. (3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety E3uilding, as well as students, parents and stafF of a clay care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside Higf- School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional i;raffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking t:hat prompt attention be given to -the matter l:his t.imc. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAMC _ ADf)RESS __` _ - __ ___ PIIONE N0. __ __t - - ~~ f -- - ~ --_ __----- --- ~_ . ~ - ~, - ~ ~-.1 ~---- -- ---- --------- ~_~ ~ ~ c ~ - _ 01.E ~ ~ ~j - _ - ---------- - r~~- ~ J , -~ J~~~ ~ o ~ ~. 3 ~s~ - --Gr~c.l~ _____~ -h-- ~ r---- ~ - -------- -_--- -- -~-~-----__ -- - - -~~ -- - - ~d - --- ----- ------- -------------. ------ -_.. --- -------- -------------- _ 4 7 ~ -- ------ -- - r~ c . r r -~,~c~~'~i~~~~m• ---- - -` "s~,~..4077.!~----~_~-------------------_----------`~~n~c-+`~ia3a _ -- ~ ~- J ----------~-p4~q_AQ._.-~A._`_~~ --------------- _ __--_. __----~~a~._~3g-FS We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds. Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does not solve the problem. Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center, and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a church with an entrance off Northside High School Road. Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic. We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient resolution would be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. ~!5 ~ L~'1NG~~~ Gov /t-r,c.J C~~,L- /_~ ~! `~ /~///e X7.7 S- ~%vvK/i~z~ Drt /e''~'E-= l/~'~ '~7~ t~~~~- ~~ ~ 523.7 ~~/-y~-G--~-G- CCi.~e, /V _W ,~~ G~C~ ` C 3~'~ 5' ~ fps C', c 1~ i~ ~.P L~,1 ~,~,~~?~ ~0°1 Lnk~ eve ;ic~~eYY, yA - a~t153-- o ~,~~ D 1 ~ ~3q~~r3~~FY ~ ~ min `' 1.~,~~ ~ yl' y ,~ ,~ ~~ VMIt _._ ~ Zv ¢ /~i7Y.i'4 ~~J=7C /Cd /`JC"~ _ s ~~ ~~~ .502-2/59 85~'-3C,.z 3 ~~,.C~3~ ~~ 9 -~y~~ ' >/> ~~ - C:C (~ -$~'~~ ,~_~~_V 3 .- b s ,sJ.":4.... ~. ~~- _ I 7 ink , ` ~ p ~~ ~ -~ ~ 1 ~ ~'J a • ! ~ G (;~ ; ~ ~:r . S'~ '~ 1 a W f~i ~ ft l< <~c~n c~ ~n Q nLLL'~ 5SS3 ~ly'~P~c~i~,~,~fi ~,~ , ~c~,.~~- ~56?_-~~~~ A A ~ A l,i.`~ ~~ dam'/' ~~ .,9 , s p a u