Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/1991 - Regular~~ ROAN ~~
ar4 ~ L
~~ 7!
2 ~
J ?
a
18 ,Eso; 88
SFS~UICENTENµ~P~
1 BmnnhtlBcgrmm~g
nuaw
~I11~It~LJ II~ ~II~iliil~P 1
~~9~8~9
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1991
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held c-n the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will 6e announced.
PRIOR TO THIS AFTERNOON'S MEETING THERE WILL BE A
MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT 2:00 P.M.
THIS WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER
THE MEETINGS IN DECEMBER WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 3
AND DECEMBER 17 1991.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M.
2. Invocation: The Reverend F. Tupper Garden
Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
i
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
LBE ADDED ITEM D-0 RESO OPPOSING DIVISION OF ROANOKE
COUNTY INTO TWO OR MORE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS.
HCN ASKED THAT ITEM D-5 BE DISCUSSED AT END OF NEW
BUSINESS IF CITIZEN IS NOT PRESENT TO SPEAK.
LBE ADDED REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF PROTEST REGARDING
APCO TRANSMISSION LINE.
ECH ADDED 1ST READING OF ORD REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH VINYARD PARK
C. PROC7AMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 17 through
23, 1991 as American Education Week.
BL,T MOTION TO ADOPT
UW
2. Recognition of receipt of the Governor's Award for
Ernironmental Excellence.
TERRY HARRINGTON AND GARDNER SMITH ACCEPTED. TH
ANNOUNCED SECRETARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILL HOLD
SPECIAL RECOGNIITON OF AWARD IN ROANOKE CO. AT LATER
DATE.
SAM RECOGNIZED PACK 280 WEBLOS WHO WERE PRESENT
SAM PRESENTED SIX-YEAR ANNIVERSARY GIFT TO ECH
D. NEW BUSINESS
a
0. Resolution opposing the division of Roanoke County into
two or more congressional districts.
R-111991-1
LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AND FAX TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY
AYE S-LBE,BI~,HCN, SAM
NAYS-RWR
1. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for funding
for Transitional Living Center.
A-111991-2
RWR MOTION TO APPROVE $10,000 FUNDING FROM BOARD
CONTINGENCY FUND
URC
2. Request for County share of traffic light at Intersection
of Route 117 and Northside High School Road.
A-111991-3
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE $12,500 FUNDING FROM CAPITAL FUND
URC
3.
A-111991-4
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
4. Request from School Board for acceptance of $3,000
award and appropriation to School Capital Improvement
Fund.
A-111991-5
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
5. Presentation of Year-end Audit.
A-111991-6
BLJ SUBST. MOTION TO ALLOCATE $375,000 FOR $100 BONUS FOR
Request from School Board for acceptance of $10,450
federal grant for the School Federal Programs Fund.
3
COUNTY AND SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
AYES-RWR,BLJ
NAYS-LBE,HCN,SAM
HCN MOTION TO ADD $791,332 TO UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
AND THAT $12,500 OF THE SCHOOL BOARD SURPLUS BE
ALLOCATED TO NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC LIGHT
AYES-LBE,HCN,SAM
NAYS-RWR,BI.J
6. Approval of amendment to the Employee Handbook -
Sick Leave Bank.
A-111991-7
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED BY BOARD MEMBERS
URC
7.
R-111991-8
SAM MOTION TO APPROVE
AYES-RWR,BI~T,HCN,SAM
NAYS-LBE
8.
A-111991-9
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
AYES-RWR,BL~T,HCN,SAM
NAYS-LBE
9.
A-111991-10
HcN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
Authorization to acquire by eminent domain 2.3 acres of
land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for
Spring Hollow Reservoir project.
Request to amend engineering services agreement with
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow
construction management.
Approval of revised Capital Improvement Program
Review Process and Calendar of Events.
4
10. Authorization to negotiate lease for Courthouse and Jail
parking facilities.
A-111991-11
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE
AYES-LBE,RWR,BI~J,SAM
NAYS-HCN
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON MONTHLY UTILITY BILLING
- DISCUSSED UNDER REPORTS
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
- CONSENT AGENDA
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
PUBLIC HEARINGS SET FOR 12/17/91
URC
1. Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 3.59 acres from
Neighborhood Conservation to Principal Industrial and
to rezone said property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a
Special Exception Permit to construct an office located at
the northwest corner of Enon and Waldron Drive, Hollins
Magisterial District upon the petition of James C.
Wilson.
2. Ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone
approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to
5
operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair
facility located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vito DeMonte.
3. Ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to
operate a used household appliance shop, located at 1806
Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District,
upon the petition of ~erett J. Miles, Sr.
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of two parcels of
land from Canaan Land Company in connection with the
Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project.
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING
2ND - 12/3/91
URC
2. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of real estate
adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with
Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp.
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 12/3/91
URC
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion
of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to
the Valley Soccer Club.
(THIS HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 3, 1991.1
2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the
6
addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to
Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of
security and fire alarm systems. (CONTINUED FROM
OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 22, 1991)
0-111991-12
LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED AND CHANGING FEES
NO VOTE
HCN SUBST. MOTION TO APPROVE AS AMENDED WITH FEES
REMAINING THE SAME.
URC
3.
0-111991-13
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
J. APPOIlVTMENTS
1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board
LBE NOMINATED HARRY NICKENS TO THREE-YEAR TERM
EXPIRING 12/31/94.
2. Grievance Panel
3. Library Board
4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of
Directors
RWR NOMNATED RITA J. GLINIECKI TO THItEE-YEAR TERM
EXPIRING 12/31/94. MIiA TO CONTACT MHSRV REGARDING Z/91
Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article
IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18, 1985 Code
(formerly Article III, Chapter 16, Code of 1971).
(CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1991)
LETTER ASKING THAT BOARD MEMBER BE APPOINTED.
5. Planning Commission
RWR REAPPOINTED DONALD R WITT TO FOUR-YEAR TERM
EXPIRING 12/31/1995.
RWR TO DISCUSS WITH SUPERVISOR-ELECT MINNIX
6. Social Services Board
HCN TO MAKE NOMINATION IN DECEMBER
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS
DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII,L BE REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
R-111991-14
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
1. Approval of Minutes -October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991,
October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991
2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department
Board of Directors.
A-111991-14.a
3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the
retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire
Station.
s
A-111991-14.6
4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in
connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III
Project.
A-111991-14.c
5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and
Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road
Drainage Project.
A-111991-14.d
L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) REMINDED BOARD OF RIBBON
CUTTING AT READ MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION. (2) ASKED THAT
LEASE PURCHASE MEMO BE PLACED ON 12/3/91 AGENDA UNDER
REPORTS. (3) ASKED PMM TO RESEARCH CONFLICT BETWEEN
CHARTER AND STATE CODE REGARDING AUTHORITY OF LIBRARY
BOARD OVER LIBRARY DIRECTION AND VVT~THER LIBRARY
BOARD COULD BE ABOLISHED. PMM WILL REPORT BACK PRIOR
TO 12/3/91 MEETING. (4) CONCERNED ABOUT THE EXTRA TWO
HOLIDAYS AT CHRISTMAS FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES AND COST
TO CITIZENS.
SUPERVISOR NICKENS: (1) ATTENDED VACO ANNUAL
CONFERENCE. (2) ANNOUNCED THAT STATE SOCIAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT WILL NOT CHANGE THE AUTHORITY FOR
INVESTIGATION OF CHILD ABUSE IN SCHOOLS. (2) $13.SM IN
LOTTERY TICKETS PURCHASED IN ROANOKE COUNTY. PRIZE
COULD BE REDUCED WITH SHARE GOING TO LO('-Ai i7TES, ~O
OPPOSED TO PROPOSAL THAT LOCALITIES SHARE WITH STATE
(80.20) COSTS OF ROAD 117AINTENANCE. SUGGESTED THESE BE
INCLUDED IN LEGISLATIVE PACKET. (3) SUGGESTED THAT TO
AVOID STREET SIGNS BEING STOLEN FREQUENTLY, THE COUN'T'Y
9
COULD SELL THEM TO CITIZENS WHO WANT THEM.
SUPERVISOR TOHNSON• (1) ASKED AMG TO CONTACT
CITIZENS IN LABELLVUE ABOUT READ MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION.
(2) ATTENDED MEETING IN SALEM ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AND ASKED THAT THIS ISSUE BE INCLUDED IN JANUARY BOARD
RETREAT.
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) THERE HAS BEEN NO
AGREEMENT YET BETWEEN THE VACO/VML TASK FORCE. (2)
ANNOUNCED THE EMPLOYEE LUNCH WII.L BE DECEMBER 18 AND
CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING WII,L BE DECEMBER 4.
M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIiJNICATIONS
NONE
N. REPORTS
BIJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 6
AND 9 AND REMOVAL OF ITEM 6 FOR A VOTE.
UW
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid -October 1991
5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for four months
ended October 31, 1991
6. Report on Monthly Utility Billing
io
A-111991-15
LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION - NO CONSENSUS
HCN MOTION TO IlVIPLEMENT ALT. #4 WITH NO ADDITIONAL
PERSONNEL
AYES-RWR,BIiT,HCN,SAM
NAYS-LBE
7. Report from Youth Haven II
S. Report on proposed Noise Ordinance
9. Industrial Development Authority 1990/91 Audit
O. WORK SESSIONS
(I~LD FOLLOWING EVENTING SESSIONT~
1. Design and Operation of Water Treatment Plant.
P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (7) FOR CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL
COUNSEL AND BRIEFINGS BY STAFF MEMBERS
PERTAINING TO ACTUAL OR PROBABLY LITIGATION,
I.E. GRUMMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY.
BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:40 P.M.
URC
EVENING SESSION
Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
R-111991-16
HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT RESO
AT 7:15 P.M.
URC
ii
R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND RECOGNITIONS
AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior
Women's CIu6 for founding the Roanoke County Library
System in 1933.
R-111991-17
LBE MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
DOT ELLER WITH WOMEN'S CLUB ACCEPTED THE RESO
S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC
HEARINGS
1191-1
0-111991-18
SAM MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
1191-2 An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2
to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into
conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile
northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley
Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the
petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission.
0-111991-19
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to
bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance
with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River
Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
iz
T. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1191-3 Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend
the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating
policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on the
northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith
Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
LBE MOTION TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO 12/3/91
URC
4 CITIZENS SPOKE
JH TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS
U. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of easements
between CWY, Inc. and the County of Roanoke in
connection with Berkley Court Subdivision and Vinyard
Park.
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 12/3/91
AYES-I.BE,RWR,HCN,SAM
ABSTAIN-BI.~
NEW BUSINESS
1. NOTICE OF PROTEST REGARDING APCO TRANSMISSION
LINE
SAM DIRECTED PMM TO PREPARE A "FRIENDLY" NOTICE OF
PROTEST.
2. ACTION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION WITH
GRUMMAN EQUIPMENT
HCN MOTION TO FILE THE NECESSARY LEGAL DOCUMENTS
13
AGAINST GRLT~VIMAN TO COVER THE LOSS OF EQUIPMENT
URC
V. CITIZEN CO1VIlViENTS AND C011~IlVIUNICATIONS
1. W. H. HIGHFILL , TLR, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF THE SOCIAL
SERVICE DEPT. CONTINUING TO INVESTIGATE CHILD ABUSE
CASES IN SCHOOL SYSTEMS.
RWR MOTION TO RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN 10/22/91
AYES-RWR,HCN,SAM
NAYS-LBE,BLJ
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD POSITION
THAT INVESTIGATION OF CHII,D ABUUE IN SCHOOL SYSTEMS BE
IlWESTIGATED BY SOCIAL SERVICES RATHER THAN SCHOOL
BOARDS, AND THAT LETTERS BE SENT TO THE APPROPRIATE
INDIVIDUALS ADVISING THEM OF THIS ACTION.
AYES - RWR, HCN, SAM
NAYS-LBE,BLJ
WORK SESSION
DESIGN AND OPERATION OF TREATMENT PLAN
PRESENTED BY CLIFF CRAIG
OPEN SESSION
HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 1030 P.M. - UW
HCN MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO
MOVE FORWARD WITH TEST BORINGS ON THE WEST SITE,
PROVIDED THERE IS NO INTEREST BY CITY OF SALEM TO
JOIlVTLY PARTICIPATE IN THE SALEM SITE, AND THAT STAFF
PROCEED TO SECURE AN OPTION FOR THE LAND SUBJECT TO
14
TESTING AND APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AYES-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM
ABSTAIN-LBE
WORK SESSION
BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO WORK SESSION FORMAT AT 1035
AYES-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM
ABSTAIN - LBE
ECH WII,L BRING BACK REPORT ON 12/3 REGARDING A CONCEPT
PLAN FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT PIANT
MADE UP OF TEAM OF COUNTY ENGINEERS AND CONSULTING
ENGINEERS FROM THE ROANOKE VALLEY.
V. ADJOURNMENT
RWR MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 10:50 P.M.
UW
15
OF ROANp~~
°~ a~
• ~~~~' $$
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul8cginning
(~II~tri~~ itf ~D~triII~2F ~ .mac ~
~-g •8.9
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1991
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
PRIOR TO THIS AFTERNOON'S MEETING THERE WILL BE A
MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT 2:00 P.M.
THIS WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER
THE MEETINGS IN DECEMBER WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 3
AND DECEMBER 17, 1991.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend F. Tupper Garden
Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
i
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 17 through
23, 1991 as American Education Week.
2. Recognition of receipt of the Governor's Award for
Environmental Excellence.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for funding
for Transitional Living Center.
2. Request for County share of traffic light at Intersection
of Route 117 and Northside High School Road.
3. Request from School Board for acceptance of $10,450
federal grant for the School Federal Programs Fund.
4. Request from School Board for acceptance of $3,000
award and appropriation to School Capital Improvement
Fund.
5. Presentation of Year-end Audit.
6. Approval of amendment to the Employee Handbook -
Sick Leave Bank.
7. Authorization to acquire by eminent domain 2.3 acres of
land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for
Spring Hollow Reservoir project.
8. Request to amend engineering services agreement with
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow
construction management.
a
9. Approval of revised Capital Improvement Program
Review Process and Calendar of Events.
10. Authorization to negotiate lease for Courthouse and Jail
parking facilities.
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF
ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
1. Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 3.59 acres from
Neighborhood Conservation to Principal Industrial and
to rezone said property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a
Special Exception Permit to construct an office located at
the northwest corner of Enon and Waldron Drive,
Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of James
C. Wilson.
2. Ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone
approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to
operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair
facility located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vito DeMonte.
3. Ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to
operate a used household appliance shop, located at 1806
Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District,
upon the petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr.
3
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of two parcels of
land from Canaan Land Company in connection with the
Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III Project.
2. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of real estate
adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with
Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp.
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion
of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to
the Valley Soccer Club.
THIS HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 3, 1991.)
2. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the
addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to
Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of
security and fire alarm systems. (CONTINUED FROM
OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 22, 1991)
3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article
IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18, 1985 Code
(formerly Article III, Chapter 16, Code of 1971).
(CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1991)
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board
2. Grievance Panel
3. Library Board
4
4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of
Directors
5. Planning Commission
6. Social Services Board
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS
DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of Minutes -October 8, 1991, October 17, 1991,
October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991
2. Ratification of inactive status of Health Department
Board of Directors.
3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles by the
retention of a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire
Station.
4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in
connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III
Project.
5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd and
Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove Road
Drainage Project.
5
L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid -October 1991
5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for four months
ended October 31, 1991
6. Report on Monthly Utility Billing
7. Report from Youth Haven II
8. Report on proposed Noise Ordinance
9. Industrial Development Authority 1990/91 Audit
O. WORK SESSIONS
1. Design and Operation of Water Treatment Plant.
P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A
Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
6
EVENTING SESSION
R PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND RECOGNITIONS
AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior
Women's Club for founding the Roanoke County Library
System in 1933.
S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC
HEARINGS
1191-1 An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to
bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance
with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River
Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
1191-2 An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2
to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into
conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile
northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley
Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the
petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission.
T. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1191-3 Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend
the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating
policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on the
northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith
Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
U. CITIZEN CONIlVIENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
V. ADJOURNMENT
C-/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEER OF
NOVEMBER 17 THROUGH 23, 1991
AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEER
WHEREAS, the health of America's democracy tomorrow
depends on the children in America's classrooms today; and
WHEREAS, America's public schools remain the surest
pathway to a future more prosperous, more just, and more free; and
WHEREAS, each community's public schools must prepare
the next generation for a new constellation of social, economic,
ethical, and political challenges; and
WHEREAS, quality education demands the active
involvement and collaboration of all segments of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of November 17
through 23, 1991, as
AMERICAN EDUCATION WEER
and urge all citizens to observe this week with appropriate
activities and to renew their commitment to the education of every
child.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto set our hands and
caused the seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed
this 19th day of November, 1991.
f
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. ~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Report; Receipt of 1991 Environmental Excellence
Award; Crowell's Gap Cleanup.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: /
j~
'i
~~
~,~ - _
BACKGROUND'
In April of this year, Roanoke County orchestrated a
public/private partnership that resulted in the cleanup of what
became known as the "Crowell's Gap Dump". With the assistance of
Franklin County and over thirty private sector individuals and
firms, thirty-three tons of illegally dumped refuse were removed
from this beautiful mountain hillside and were legally placed in
the regional landfill. Over $100,000 in equipment and labor were
donated to this effort. The Board commended all of the involved
parties in May of 1991 (Resolution 52891-1).
In August of this year, the Department of Planning and Zoning
submitted this commendable effort as a nominee for the 1991
Governor's Environmental Excellence Awards. Statewide over 300
nominations were submitted. In October we were notified that we
had received one of the sixteen awards granted this year. In
recognizing Roanoke County, the Governor cited the cooperation
between Roanoke County and Franklin County and the successful
partnership between the public and private sectors.
Roanoke County and Franklin County jointly accepted the award
at a dinner ceremony with Governor Wilder held on October 17th.
Lee Garman, who was instrumental in orchestrating the cleanup,
accepted the award from the Governor on the County's behalf. The
Governor presented Mr. Garman a framed resolution, and a large
banner commemorating the receipt of this award.
~"
2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board recognize the County's receipt
of this award, and direct that the banner be displayed in the
Community Room of the RCAC.
Respectfully Submitted,
Terrance L. Harrin on
Director of Plann ng and Zoning
Approved,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Vote
No Yes Abs
~ 4L/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION 111991-1 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OPPOSING THE DIVISION OF ROANORE COUNTY
INTO TWO OR MORE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, news reports indicate that the Virginia General
Assembly is considering one or more congressional redistricting
plans that would divide Roanoke County between the sixth and ninth
congressional districts; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
believes that future relations with Congress will be enhanced and
strengthened if the entire county remains in one congressional
district; and
WHEREAS, dividing Roanoke County into two or more
congressional districts will create undue confusion among Roanoke
County citizens who have historically been part of the sixth
congressional district; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County that the strongest opposition be
stated to any redistricting plan that would divide Roanoke County
into two or more congressional districts; and
FURTHER, that copies of this resolution be transmitted
immediately by electronic means to all members of the Virginia
State Senate and House of Delegates who represent areas of Roanoke
County and to Congressman Jim Olin.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to approve the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: Supervisor Robers
A COPY TESTE:
~~ ~ '
Mary H. llen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Roanoke Valley Legislators
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION NO. A-111991-2
ITEM NUMBER ~ _ I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Total Action Against Poverty for
additional funding for the Transitional Living
Center
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 8 COMMENTS: `;~,,~.,,,~ iy~~~~^~
r~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Total Action Against Poverty has requested time on the agenda to
update the Board on the Transitional Living Center.
Representatives also plan to make a request for additional funds
for the project.
During the 1991-92 budget process, the Board of Supervisors
approved a $15,000 contribution to the Center. Staff at TAP has
indicated that they will be making a request for additional funds
in the amount of $10,000 to help meet the required federal match
for the HUD Supportive Housing Demonstration Grant. Roanoke City
Council recently approved an additional $75,000 and TAP also plans
to ask the City of Salem for additional funds. TAP originally
asked for a deadline extension of November 15, 1991 to confirm that
matching funds would be available. The deadline has again been
extended to allow Roanoke County to take action on this request.
Attached is further information regarding the Transitional Living
Center.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$10,000 must be appropriated from the Unappropriated Balance or
Board Contingency Fund for this request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the $10,000
request for additional funds, and that the funds be allocated from
the Board Contingency Fund.
~_i
7
^ - %F
jj r ~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: Richard W. Robers motion
to approve $10,000 funding from Eddy
Board Contingency Fund Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
X
x
x
x
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Education
Employment
Health
Housing and
Homelessness
Neighbodroods
Economic
Development
Crime Prevention
Cabell Brand,
President
Georgia Meadows,
Vice ('resident
Elizabeth Bowles,
Secretary
Lewis Peery,
Creasurer
Monty Plymale,
A ssisla n t
Sncrctnry/Treasurer
John Berry
Sarah Bostic
Pauline Brower
Betty Carpenter
Elmore Dennis
Ted Feinour
John Fishwick
Jeanne Goddard
Cleo Hardy
Zane )ones
A. C. Jordan
Hilda Larson
Laurence Levy
Betty Littleton
Gertrude Logan
Dorothy Mendenhall
A. 6V. MEn rill
Rosa Miller
Meredith L. Mills
Paul Moyer
Lewis Nelson
Larry Rcnfroe
Rev. James W. Reynolds
Malika Shakoor
Linda Scruggs
William Sparrow
Elizabeth Stokes
Floruu: Thornhill
W. D. lNard
Bernice Watson
Nancy Williams
Posl Office Box 2868
Roanoke, Virginia
24001-2868
(703J 345-6781
Fax (703) 345-4461
October 17, 1991
Elmer Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
3738 Brambleton Avenue SW
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Elmer:
~_i
On behalf of the Board of Total Action Against Poverty, I am
respectfully requesting the emergency allocation of $10,000 for
the Transitional Living Center. We are truly grateful for the
consistent support demonstrated by Roanoke County for the TLC
since its opening three years ago.
Due to drastic decreases in local private charitable contributions
which, in past years, have helped us to meet the required match
for the HUD Supportive Housing Demonstration Grant, we are
$87,000 short of the matching funds required for the Program
Year which begins December 1, 1991. Our contract with HUD
requires us to confirm matching funds for PY 91-92 by
September 30, 1991. We have requested and received an
extension of this deadline until November 15, 1991.
It was the decision of the TAP Board to go back to each locality
to request additional emergency funding to make up the existing
shortfall. With the decade of federal funding cuts and the
problems we have had over the last few years, the agency is
simply not in the position to provide the funds. To do so would
seriously jeopardize other critical education, employment,
housing and health care services.
The Transitional Living Center has been a godsend to homeless
people, helping them to get on their feet. Over the last three
~- i
years, we have served more than 700 residents. Of the 274
residents served last year, 60% were assisted in obtaining income,
either through employment or eligibility for benefits, and one-
third of the residents who left the TLC were transitioned into
permanent housing.
Cabell will be appearing before the Board of Supervisors on
Monday afternoon with a presentation on the TLC and the request
for $10,000. Meeting the HUD match is imperative if the TLC is
to continue to provide critically needed services to the homeless
in our community. Roanoke County's financial support is crucial
if the match is to be met.
Sincerely,
~ ~~~~~
Ted Edlich
Executive Director
cc: Members of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
~ -i
I am here today with an emergency request on behalf of the Transitional
Living Center for $10,000 to complete the focal match required to access
the federal grant funds. Just over a month ago, the TLC was in a serious
deficit situation, with less than $75,000 raised of the $162,000 needed to
match the HUD grant. It was the decision of the TAP Board of Directors to
request emergency allocations from each of the Valley governments to
make up the difference of $87,000 in order to meet the November 15
deadline for confirmation to HUD of the match.
Requests were made to Roanoke City ($74,952), Botetourt County ($2,500),
Salem ($5,000) and Roanoke County ($10,000). To date, Roanoke City has
pledged $72,500 and Salem has contributed $5,000. A letter from Roanoke
County Administrator Elmer Hodge stating that the Board of Supervisors
would consider TAP's request on this date, and his recommendation of
approval of the $10,000 contribution allowed us to meet the November 15
deadline with all other necessary funding in place and the Roanoke County
contribution tentatively pledged.
This is the last piece of the funding puzzle needed to match the federal
money and ensure operation of the TLC for the year that begins Dec. 1.
Meeting the match will provide the TLC with $324,000 in base operating
funds, enabling it to provide its effective program of transitional housing
and comprehensive support services to the homeless residents of the
Roanoke Valley.
Last year the TLC served 274 residents, but turned away another 577. Of
those served, nearly 80% obtained income through employment or benefit
programs. Fully a third of the residents who left the TLC last year
transitioned into stable permanent housing.
The base operating cost will enable the TLC to house and serve 35-40
residents daily. An additional $100,000 is required to operate the facility
at full capacity of 75 residents per day. However, with the base funding
in place, private contributions can be used to provide services to
additional residents.
We are extremely grateful that Roanoke County has continuously
contributed to the operation of the TLC since its opening in 1988. Your
contribution of $10,000 at this time is the critical piece to ensure the
successful operation of the program for another year.
ACTION NO.
A-111991-3
ITEM NUMBER ~ 'c~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Request for funds for a traffic signal at the
intersection of Northside High School Road and
Peters Creek Road.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~L.L.rc~-r~rw~-.~~ q~~,~-~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Current estimate for installation of this signal is $100,000.
The cost would be shared equally by Roanoke County, the City of
Roanoke, Virginia Department of Transportation and Kroger Food
Stores.
BACKGROUND'
For the past five years there has been an on-going effort to
have a traffic signal installed at the intersection of Northside
High School Road and Peters Creek Road. Concerns over the need for
this signal have been expressed by Kroger on behalf of its more
than 300 employees, the Northside High School and Jr. High School
Administrations and P.T.A.'s on behalf of their students, and by
the Roanoke County Chief of Police regarding the safety of officers
who come and go from the Roanoke County Public Safety Center.
A 1986 traffic study indicated that signal was warranted at
this location. There have been a number of collisions and near
misses since that time. However, despite that, and numerous
letters and petitions, no action has yet been taken.
Roanoke County Staff has worked with the City of Roanoke, VDOT
and Kroger to arrange a joint project. The other entities have
agreed to pay their share of the cost. The Roanoke County School
Administration has agreed to pay one-half the County portion. Once
the project is approved, it is expected to take six to nine months
before the signal would be installed.
FISCAL IMPACT'
The County's share from the Capital Fund Unappropriated
Balance is $12,500.
r .
~-a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that $12,500 be appropriated from the Capital
Fund Unappropriated Balance to allow this project to proceed.
Respectfully submitted,
/v .
Donnie C. My s
Assistant Administrator
ACTION
Approved (~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson
Denied ( ) motion to approve $12,500 Eddy
Received ( ) from Capital Fund Johnson
Referred ( ) McGraw
To ( ) Nickens
Robers
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
cc: File
Donnie C. Myers, Assistant Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Dr. Bayer Wilson, Superintendent, Schools
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
,~
ACTION #
A-111991-4
ITEM NUMBER ..L~' J
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM:
Acceptance of Additional Grant of $10,450 and
Appropriation to the School Federal Programs Fund
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County Schools has been awarded an additional grant of
$10,450 under Chapter 1 of Title I, Elementary and Secondary
Education Act, for program improvement. These federal funds have
been made available to school divisions who wish to offer
remediation or special instruction and materials to assist
elementary school children who do not achieve to their expected
level. Roanoke County has identified a need for this type of
funding which will be used to provide training and retraining of
personnel, to develop appropriate curricula and innovative
strategies to enhance parental involvement, and to purchase
materials and equipment.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. 100 percent federally funded with no
county matching funds required. Revenue would be recorded to
reflect $10,450.00 in the School Federal Programs Fund for 1991-
92. Expenditures would also be recorded.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the
additional grant totaling $10,450.00 and appropriation of said
amount to the School Federal Programs Fund.
~.
eph Kyle, Di ctor of Elmer C. Hodge
ederal Programs & esting County Administrator
ACTION
Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. NickensEddy
Denied ( ) motion to approve _ Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred ( ) ~ Nickens
To _ Robers
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools
No
VOTE
Yes
x
Abs
x
X
x_
X
~-3
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 24, 1991 IN THE
BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM,
VIRGINIA.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL FEDERAL
PROGRAMS FUND.
WHEREAS, application was made for federal program
improvement assistance funds under Chapter 1 of Title I of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act to assist elementary
school children who do not achieve to their expected level, and
WHEREAS, $10,450 in additional funding has been
approved, 100 percent federally reimbursable, to provide training
and retraining of personnel, to develop appropriate curricula and
innovative strategies to enhance parental involvement, and to
purchase materials and equipment;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board
of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly
seconded requests an additional appropriation of $10,450 to the
Chapter 1 account in the School Federal Programs Fund.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S.
Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
TEST
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
ACTION # A-111991-5
ITEM NUMBER ~' ~
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Award of $3,000.00 and Request for
Appropriation to the School Capital Improvements
Fund for Instructional Equipment
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~/'
y ~~ ~~e
/~L~r-e--ryy-
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
For the past several years the General Electric Elfun Society has
been very supportive of the school system by making substantial
financial awards for individual school projects. The Elfuns on
October 14, 1991 presented the school division a check for $3,000
to be applied toward the purchase of a Braille printer which can
be attached to a computer. The total cost of the printer is
$4,600; the remaining $1,600 will be expended from capital
improvements funds for instructional equipment. The printer will
be used by a blind Glenvar High student who is learning
keyboarding and, with the assistance of a laptop computer, will
be able to take notes, print them in Braille and use them as
study guides. The printer will also be used by the itinerant
vision teacher in preparing tests and other materials for the
Glenvar High student and a blind student at Bent Mountain
Elementary School.
FISCAL
Capital
fund the
IMPACT: Will require a $1,600 expenditure
Improvements Fund for Instructional Equipment
cost of the printer.
from the
to totally
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the
monetary award and appropriation of funds as requested.
Eddie L. Kolb, Director Elmer C. Hodg
Pupil Personnel Services County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( x) t on by. y Eddy
Denied ( ) motion to approve _ Johnson
Received ( ) _ McGraw
Referred ( ) Nickens
To Robers
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Mo i Harr C. Nickens x
x
x
x
x
~-~
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 24, 1991 IN THE
BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM,
VIRGINIA.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE
SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND FOR
INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT.
WHEREAS, the General Electric Elfun Society has awarded
the Roanoke County School System $3,000.00 to be applied toward
the purchase of a Braille printer that attaches to a computer to
be used by and for blind students;
BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke
County on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded
requests an appropriation of $3,000.00 to the School Capital
Improvements Fund for Instructional Equipment to assist with the
purchase of a Braille printer.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S.
Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
TESTE:
,~
.c-~:-r __ _ , C l c r k
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
ACTION NO.
A-111991-6
ITEM NUMBER J-1"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Report on Audited Financial Statements for the Year
Ended June 30, 1991
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~f~ -c~'~z~''-~~ ~-~`~'``~ ~ ~?~ 7~i 3 3 Z
ohm ~,, _;~=~'4-~t.~G-may ~-f..~'~ -~.t/~-G"~ _~'-rr ,I .~-l ~ ~v
~ //
BACKGROUND: On August 27, 1991, staff presented the preliminary
financial figures for the year ended June 30, 1991. KPMG Peat
Marwick has now completed their independent audit of the County's
financial statements for the year. Earlier today the auditors met
with the audit committee to discuss the results of the financial
statements and the preliminary management letter comments. The
printed comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended
June 30, 1991 is currently being printed and will be distributed
around the first of December.
SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: On August 27, 1991, we reported that an
additional $680,000 would be available to add to the fund balance
as a result of actual expenditures being less than budget. During
the year end procedure, additional revenues were accrued and the
final amount available to add to fund balance is $791,332. In
addition, the school preliminary report showed $592,429 available
to the schools as a result of expenditures being less than budget.
This amount has remained unchanged.
Unless otherwise directed, the County money automatically reverts
to Unappropriated Fund Balance at year end. The School money
reverts to the School Bus Fund. The County School Board met on
October 10, 1991 and adopted a resolution for its year end surplus
as follows:
School Buses $ 350,000
Mason Cove Sewage System 40,000
Traffic Light at Northside High
School and Peters Creek Rd. 12,500
Other Capital Needs (Including Roofs) 189,929
Total $ 592,429
1
~j-5
We are currently reviewing the County revenues for 1991-1992 to
date. Because of the sluggish economy we are monitoring the
projected budgets for personal property taxes, sales tax and real
estate tax. In addition, the State is notifying localities of
declines in State aid for education and state-wide sales tax. The
revenues will be reviewed in detail in January 1992. At this time
we would recommend caution. The Schools have volunteered to delay
the purchase of their school buses for a few months until we can
get a clearer picture of all the revenues.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends allowing the $791,332 to
remain in the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for future budget
needs. Staff also recommends approving the School Board resolution
with the understanding that they will hold off on the purchase of
school buses until this year's revenues are certain.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
~. rrn.t,~
Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by: Harr ick
motion to a , to Eddy x
unappropriated balance and thatJohnson x _
12,500 of the School Board McGraw x
surplus be allocated to Nickens x
Northside High School traffic Robers x
light
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Schools
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
2
~!
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986 $1,584,637 3.16$
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987 $2,063,493 3.87
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1988 $3,037,141 5.32
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1989 $4,038,318 6.93
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1990 $5,653,746 8.57
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1991 $5,060,731 7.41$
Undesignated Fund Balance at November 19, 1991 $5,060,731 7.23
3
~...5
O
M
N
C
7
"1
ro
0
ro
c
~w
.,~
N ~
00 N
Fa >~
7 U
^ }1
x LI
O O
C w
O N
P: C
O
W ..i
O i~
~. L+
N N
a a
7O
O
U w
O
fn
+>
N
U
C~
I I 1 I I II
1 1 NN 01M W I ~' W I d'd' I O II
Ul I I O O O O W I O 1n 1 IL) 00 I M it
U I rl I W ~00MM I W c0 I W~ 101 II
a I W I .. .. .. , .. .. I I I I
>. 1 7 I 1N Nd'li7 I N1 I d'1[1 I O II
[-~ 1 a1 I ti01 ^y c00 I OM I CO I CO II
ri I U I 01 [0 V' V' cD I O 00 11 1l1 11 II
rl ro I Q I I 1~ 1 II
Q C I I O N V' N OD I 01 O I CO I [~ II
C I I M .--I .--i I O O I 1 II
.-1 w l I I ... I I II
~ I _
+1 rl I I I 11 II
O 1d I I 000001 I O MCO 100 I O II
F N I I 0 0 0 001 I 01 01 M I M M I I I
M I N I 0 0 0 000 1 W 1 M I LA N I II
C I N I I 1 I II
N I 00 1 010001 I c0 MCO I M M 1 II
C7 I ro I 1O01n d' 11 Nt0 100 I II
1 7 1 01 O M .-I N 1 cD .^I 47 I O O I II
I W I I 1 I II
I I O M V' N CO I W .~-1 V' 1 1 1 I II
I I M ~--I "I I O 1~ I~ 1 II
1 I I ~ I I II
I I I I^ I 11
I 1 NNO)MO I [D .i I u7 V' 101 II
ro I 1 O O O O.--i I N S I N M 1 O II
C I .-i 1 OJT W MO I'd's I ~ 1 1 c0 I I
C I cd I I I I II
W I 7 1 1 N N d' 1 1 d' OI 1 u7 1l7 I O II
p I~ I ti 01 .~-I O O I 1c7 c0 I .-1 00 11 II
C I U I MtD d'd' cD I rl W 11C0 1 N II
U} I Q I I I Q I - II
I I ONd'N 1 1 N W I 1 1 1 it
ro l I M~ .ti I tD cD I I II
C I I I ... I 1 II
C I
w l I I ^^ I^ I II
I I 000000 I W N c0 100 I O II
.-1 I I 000001 101 It7M 10101 1 II
W I +~ I 000001 101 d'M 111 I II
H 1 N I I i I it
71 I DO I 010001 I cDMCO 1 NN I II
C l ro l 1 0 0117 1 1 0 1 In I N N I II
U I C I TO M.--I N I 1 0 In I O 01 I II
C7 I W I I I I II
I I O Md'N 1 1 1 Od' I cD [0 I II
I I M .--I r1 I O 1~ 1 ~-' I II
I I I ~ I I II
I II
1 N .-i I O II I
.-I M 1 II
N II
t p M M I M I I M O I M I I
N Q7 1 I Q7 II 1 M I
I M II
^ II
^ I II
IL7 'd' O I O II 001 I .--I II
M (D fD 1 [D II c0 (D I 01 II
IL7 r-I 0 1 1 it O N I 1 II
.--I .--I 10 I 1 II u7 d' 1
I II I
I II I
N
N
>
y
N
(-I }1
N ~. N
N [~ O
U O
a
r N N
+~ ~ e
c+ ~, i~ o
y c v oro ti
m k .C N U a ~+ w
vm +' m
o xo
F
O f v
k N f.1 W U N
U] F N td ro N N 7 ro C L.
Ul Ul F N G U A U1 N H ttl O
x >, 5 0 [a C a a ~ o ~ •~
ca ,~ v a m ~ H o a ~ +~
F c, ro N C N rl N
r 0.l
ro Lt1 cd
~
a~a^a~
>,ama~> U
a m
w ~
No
oc+o ti~ roo
.1 0 o a~ a w ~wro oY a s
c. c. rn •~1 a ~ ro y ~ a [a a o
oa ~a m a ro•.+ro+~ ^ w
a .~ r~ In m 7 0 o ro o m ro oo ~
O rl t0 N N N w U +~ C a1 C 4l •.1 O 01
F. 16 cq N ~ sa a~ q W o Id oo ~ N +1 rn
a s ~,~ c c oo m e aa•~I c o
v, o rl a o ~ o a rl oo x oo N c ro C 1
Ul r-I N cp •.I ••a DO •^I td •^I W •.I N m a ~
7~ t+ U N .i
roc
q
a N w 'ti , .
O
C N N O C ~-1 C ~rl C N N C Ul +~ O
N 0.' a .] W C N +I •^I ro A A 5 G1 N
ro W •.i .-a
ro
C N ro
fk W U 0.l w a .] Q
4
COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Audited Balance at July 1, 1990
7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools
9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department
9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User
Fees
11/13/90 Allied Signal
11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station
12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds
12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns
12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service
12/18/90 Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station
Balance as of June 25, 1991
~'
~ of General~l~
Amount Fund Expenditures
$5,653,756
500,000
(200,000)
(85,421)
(875,000)
(174,886)
(347,500)
(186,850)
(5,000)
(9,700)
$4,269,399
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
6.25$
Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement
to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25 of General Fund
expenditures ($68,310,395).
5
~_5
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 10, 1991 IN THE
BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ALLOCATION OF THE 1990-
91 YEAR-END BALANCE IN THE SCHOOL OPERATING
BUDGET.
WHEREAS, the audit of school operations for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 1991 indicates a balance of $592,429, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has by
resolution allowed the school board to retain the year-end
balance in the capital account for the purchase of school buses
with the latitude of applying some of the funds to other needs;
BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke
County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded,
requests the Board of County Supervisors to retain $350,000 of
the year-in surplus in the bus fund; and to transfer $242,429 to
the capital fund to purchase land for a new sewage system for
Mason's Cove Elementary School (estimated at $40,000), to fund
the school board's portion of the cost for installing a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek and Northside High
School roads (estimated at $12,500), and to reserve the balance
for other needs.
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford,
Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Paul G. Black
TESTE~•77
\,%
.~.~- y `y , Clerk
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt
6
iiiiii~~iii~i~i~i~~ii~~i~~~ii~i~~i~iiii~~~ii~~~~ii~iii~~~~i~i~~iiiii~itiiii~ii
AGENDA ITEM NO. -~ - ~~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
-PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: _
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
/f
-; ~_
~, ~. ,
_ f
,,,
1 _,
,;
~~-~
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON OCTOBER 10, 1991 IN THE
BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ALLOCATION OF THE 1990-
91 YEAR-END BALANCE IN THE SCHOOL OPERATING
BUDGET.
WHEREAS, the audit of school operations for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 1991 indicates a balance of $592,429, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has by
resolution allowed the school board to retain the year-end
balance in the capital account for the purchase of school buses
with the latitude of applying some of the funds to other needs;
BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke
County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded,
requests the Board of County Supervisors to retain $350,000 of
the year-in surplus in the bus fund; and to transfer $242,429 to
the capital fund to purchase land for a new sewage system for
Mason's Cove Elementary School (estimated at $40,000), to fund
the school board's portion of the cost for installing a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek and Northside High
School roads (estimated at $12,500), and to reserve the balance
ACTION NO. A-111991-7
ITEM NUMBER ~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Amendment to Employee Handbook -
Sick Leave Bank
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: `~ ~ ~~l•
~~~ c~~ ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Sick Leave Bank Program for County employees is recommended
to provide a loan of sick leave benefits for eligible employees who
experience a serious illness or disability. The first 240 hours
(30 consecutive workings days) of illness or disability must be
covered by an employee's own accumulated leave or leave without
pay, prior to utilization of the Sick Leave Bank.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The establishment of a Sick Leave Bank program will provide
for a loan of sick leave in the event of a major or protracted
illness, after accumulated sick leave and annual leave balances
have been exhausted.
The establishment of the Sick Leave Bank program has been
reviewed by the Internal Support and Operations Team, the Strategic
Management Team and the Employee Advisory Committee. Prior to
finalizing this program, similar sick leave programs in other
municipalities were reviewed. The program recommended for adoption
is similar to the Roanoke County Schools Sick Leave Bank program.
A Sick Leave Bank program has operated successfully in the school
system since July 1, 1982.
A proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Employee Handbook
is included with this report as Attachment A. Included as
Attachment B is the proposed Sick Leave Bank policy referred to in
the County Employee Handbook amendment. The proposed amendment
will become effective on July 1, 1992, at the beginning of the new
fiscal year. This will provide adequate time for payroll
programming changes by the Department of Management Information
Systems, and for data entry, reporting, ordering of forms and
dissemination of information to employees (MIS request memo
attached).
~-~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Roanoke County Employee Handbook be
amended to incorporate the Sick Leave Bank program included as
Attachment A of this report.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
D. Keith Cook Elmer C. Hodge
Director, Human Resources County Administrator
ACTION
Approved ( ~ Motion by: Harr C' _ Ni t~kPnS
Denied ( ) to api rnvP a ~ amPnc3PC3 b~
ReCelVed ( ) Beard MPmbPrs
Referred ( )
To ( )
-----------------
VOTE
No Yes Ab
Eddy ~
Johnson ~
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
~~
D. PROCEDURES CONCERNING USE OF SICK LEAVE BANR BENEFIT
1. The employee must make application for this benefit - it
is not automatic.
2. The sick leave bank benefit may be used by an enrolled
employee for a major and protracted illness, the duration
of which requires the employee to utilize all of his/her
accumulated sick leave and annual leave. The benefit is
for the enrolled employee only; family illnesses are
excluded from coverage.
3. The first 240 hours (30 consecutive working days) of
illness or disability must be covered by the employee's
own accumulated leave or leave without pay.
4. A member of the bank shall not be permitted to use his or
her sick leave bank benefits until all his or her own
sick leave and annual leave is depleted. If compensation
is received by an employee as the result of an illness or
an injury covered under the County's worker's
compensation program, at no time shall the employee be
permitted to draw more salary income from worker's
compensation and the sick leave bank than the employee
normally would draw had the employee not been injured or
disabled. An employee who is presently disabled from
work who has received approval for disability retirement
benefits through the Virginia Retirement System or social
Security shall not be permitted his or her sick leave
bank benefit.
5. A physician's certificate is required before a sick leave
bank member can use his or her sick leave bank benefit.
This certificate is to be submitted to the Department of
Human Resources and must include the employee's name,
social security number, and occupation. The physician
Amended to must indicate: the nature of the illness or disability,
include that the employee is unable to perform any work because
secondary job of such illness or disability, the date the employee
ceased work, and approximately how long the employee will
be unable to return to work. A request for loan of days
from the sick leave bank, accompanied by the physician's
certificate, must be submitted to the Department of Human
Resources on forms provided by the Department of Human
Resources.
2
~•~o
6. A maximum of 360 hours (45 working days) from the bank
may be utilized each fiscal year by any one member.
Participating members must return to work and must meet
the requirements of items 1,3,4 and 5 before again
becoming eligible to utilize sick leave bank benefits.
If the member suffers a relapse within 30 calendar days
due to the same illness or disability which necessitated
initial utilization of the bank, the member need not meet
another 30-working-day elimination period.
7. Repayment Requirements
At the beginning of each fiscal year, following receipt
of the loan, the loan recipient shall donate a minimum of
24 hours of sick leave or annual leave to the sick leave
bank until the loan has been repaid in full. Upon
termination of employment, any balance due the sick leave
bank shall be repaid to the sick leave bank from the
balance of unused sick leave days. or annual leave
E. ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS
The members of a bank shall be assessed annually an additional
8 hours of sick leave when that bank is reduced to 800 hours
(100 days).
Notification of such assessment shall be sent to each member
at the time it is determined to be necessary, and the
assessment shall be made unless the participant chooses to
cease membership in the bank. A member not wishing the
assessment may terminate membership in the bank by notifying
the Department of Human Resources, in writing, within 30
calendar days from the date of the notice. A member who has
no sick leave to contribute at the time of assessment shall be
assessed these 8 hours from the first sick leave subsequently
accumulated.
F. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
Upon termination of employment or withdrawal of membership
from the bank, a participating employee shall not be permitted
to withdraw his or her contributed hours.
Final determination of utilization of the sick leave bank will be
at the discretion of the I~tsrna-Y-~vppor~and-9peratsons~ea~ after
review of the request by the Director of Human Resources.
discretion of County Administrator 10/15/91
~-~
Attachment B
SICK LEAVE BANK
A. GENERAL
A sick leave bank for Roanoke County employees shall be
maintained. The donation of sick leave will not adversely
affect the Attendance Award Program.
B. MEMBERSHIP
Membership shall be voluntary on the part of the employees.
C. ENROLLMENT
All full time regular employees who have completed their first
six months of original employment or re-employment are
considered as eligible employees for this program. An
eligible employee may enroll by donating 16 hours of his or
her accumulated sick leave or annual leave to the bank. In
addition, as annual leave credits accumulated may not exceed
240 hours (thirty days) at the end of any fiscal year (June
30), any eligible employee may donate any excess hours over
the 240 hour annual leave maximum to the sick leave bank at
the end of the fiscal year. Accumulated sick leave or annual
leave contributed to the bank must have been earned while in
the employment of the County of Roanoke. Enrollment may be
accomplished by forwarding a completed Sick Leave Bank
Application Form to the Department of Human Resources on forms
provided by the Department of Human Resources.
The periods of enrollment shall be as follows:
1. An eligible employee may enroll at the time of completion
of their first six months of original employment or re-
employment.
2. An eligible employee who does not enroll when first
eligible (under item 1 above) may do so between any
subsequent June 1 to June 30 period by making application
on forms provided by the Department of Human Resources.
Such an employee must be enrolled in the plan for six
months prior to becoming eligible to utilize the benefits
of the sick leave bank. The six-month qualification
period must expire before the eligibility period
commences for benefits relating to a particular illness
or disability.
1
D-b
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: DIANE HYATT COPIES: INTERNAL SERVICES TEAM
VICKI BENNINGER
FROM: DIANA C WILSON
DATE: September 6, 1991
SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF SICK LEAVE BANK FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES
I WANT TO REQUEST THAT THE SICK LEAVE BANK BE IMPLEMENTED WITH THE
NEW FISCAL YEAR. THE FIRST OPEN ENROLLMENT WILL BE FROM JUNE 1,
1992 - JUNE 30, 1992. THIS FOLLOWS THE POLICY FOR THE YEARLY
ENROLLMENT PERIOD. THIS WILL GIVE MY DEPARTMENT ADEQUATE TIME FOR
ANALYSIS AND PROGRAMMING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE PROJECT COMPLETED IN
TIME FOR DATA ENTRY, REPORTING, ETC. THIS MAY ALSO ALLOW ENOUGH
TIME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES AND/OR PAYROLL TO PLAN FOR THE ADDITIONAL
FORMS, WORK, ETC. THAT MAY BE NEEDED.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS, PLEASE CALL ME AT 561-8004.
~e
Attachment A
AMENDMENT TO ROANORE COONTY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
CHAPTER I%
B. Sick Leave
8. Sick Leave Bank
A Sick Leave Bank is available for eligible employees on a
voluntary basis. This program provides for a loan of sick
leave in the event of a major or protracted illness, after all
accumulated sick leave and annual leave balances have been
exhausted. This program will become effective July 1, 1992.
For further information refer to the Sick Leave Bank Policy on
file in the Department of Human Resources.
Amendment #91-05
e
_./'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION 111991-8 PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION
15.1-238 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950 (AS AMENDED),
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A 2.030-ACRE PARCEL OF
LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE R. WIDNEY FOR THE
SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT BY EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, including the
construction of a water supply system, pump station, and reservoir,
has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of
Roanoke County.
2. That the project is necessary for the general health,
safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a
long-term water source in Roanoke County.
3. That acquisition of a certain parcel of land, consisting
of 2.030 acres, is necessary for construction of the major access
road to the reservoir and the pump station.
4. That the parcel of land required for this phase of the
project is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney and is
more particularly described as follows:
All that certain parcel of land, together with any
improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and
appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba
Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown
and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474"
upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden
Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This
being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph
H. Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by
deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474.
The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke
County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7.
5. That the fair market value of the property is $4,800.00,
which is hereby offered to the property owners for purchase of fee
simple, marketable title to the subject parcel by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter
upon and take possession of such property and commence construction
of said water supply system, pump station and reservoir and any
other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more
adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and
to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as
to the above-described property as provided by law.
7. That a certified copy of this resolution, to be sent by
certified mail to Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, on or
before November 22, 1991, shall constitute notice to said property
owners of the offer to purchase as set forth above and the intent
to enter upon and take possession of said property to commence
construction, as provided for in Section 15.1-238 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950 (as amended).
7. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and Section
15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), the Board does
hereby invoke all and singular the rights, privileges, and
provisions as to the vesting of powers in the County under the
Virginia General Condemnation Act (§25-46.1, et se ., of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, (as amended), and Section 15.1-238, all as made
and provided by law.
8. That the County Administrator and the County Attorney are
a
r
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions
as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition through eminent
domain proceedings, or otherwise.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: Supervisor Eddy
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney - Certified Copy
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGOLAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Pursuant To Title 25 And Section 15.1-
238 Of The Code Of Virginia, 1950 (as amended),
Authorizing The Acquisition Of And Immediate Right
of Entry To A 2.030-Acre Parcel of Land from Joseph
H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney for the Spring
Hollow Reservoir Project By Eminent Domain
Proceedings
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 4~ ~ ~'
BACKGROUND•
As part of the Spring Hollow project, a number of properties
have been previously acquired. As negotiations for the purchase of
these lands progressed, agreements were reached with all landowners
except Mr. Davis and Ms. Widney. At that time, staff did not
pursue acquisition through eminent domain proceedings since the
financing of the project had not been approved by the Board.
Subsequent to the financing approval, the staff contacted the
owners and has been unable to reach an agreeable settlement.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The subject property is necessary for the Spring Hollow
Reservoir project, in order to provide the main access to the
reservoir and the pump station. This parcel of land is owned by
Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, and is more particularly
described as follows:
All that certain parcel of land, together with any
improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and
appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba
Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown
and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474"
upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden
Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This
being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph H.
D • ~j
Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by
deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474.
The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke
County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7.
In an effort to reach a settlement with the owners, a written
offer of $4,000.00 has been extended to the property owners; the
owners have made a verbal counter-offer of $20,000.00 for purchase
of the property by the County. Consequently, Staff feels that it
is necessary at this time to go forward with eminent domain
proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement
of project construction as previously directed by the Board.
Staff has obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated
fair market value for the proposed acquisition from Earl G.
Robertson, MAI, SRPA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. The
appraiser's opinion is that the estimated market value of the
proposed acquisition is $2,358.30 per acre. Based upon the
surveyed acreage of 2.030, the estimated fair market value of the
property is $4,787.35, rounded to $4,800.00.
FISCAL IMPACT'
The appraised value of
Hollow account along with
awards made by the court.
ALTERNATIVES'
$4, 800.00 would be paid from the Spring
all related court costs and additional
Funds are available from Bond proceeds.
1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of and
immediate right of entry to the 2.030-acre parcel of land
from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney by eminent
domain proceedings.
2. Authorize County staff to accept the offer of $20,000
made by the owners.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt a resolution pursuant to
Title 25 and Section 15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as
amended), and authorize the County Administrator and the County
Attorney to take such steps as may be necessary to acquire the
Davis-Widney property, together with all rights incident thereto,
by eminent domain proceedings.
SUBMI D BY:
J n R. bbard, P. .
Assistan County Administrator
APPROVED:
~a , /~~~,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
~' 1
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION VOTE
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
No Yes Abs
Q
i..,ti
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
Z~ti ~ Q'
e
c S = ~ `-~
V ~
J
~~o~
~ v /~
` Oti ~
~
~ ~ E~
.C1. ~ O~ti'L ~
'
A= 1 B'14'OS"
R= 1265.62
T= ?03.11 O ~ ~hh
,tit ~1 ~ f
~ /h,~`E
~~~
TAX'~73.00-1-6
//// PROPERTY OP
~' TFIE g OARn OG SUPER V /SOR4
tib (ROn P(N 5ET OF ROANOKE CO. V/R4IN/A
l5'ON DINE
0A FROM IjOR. (1. ff. 1251 1'G.1365
'~ _ s
` q0 s~ABAnnoNEo
y WATE4 DINE
19'x ?9'
ME lAl'
5lfEn
m
c'>
s_
BRG.105~69'35'13°W •~..~ ~~~1~~1 G. ~ 30 ,~. Q~iRE~!
CHD. 401.09 2a' p2 n• 13. (0 3 5 Pf1, 47¢ I 3) J
IRON PIN 5ET~6~, ~(0 Q~~ i 2 P~P65 ~
~~ z 13RANCN fYti~,tb'~. VIp
lQ`~~/a0 ~ ~ ~
p~v
~~ o
,z s ~ .,~., ° N ~
~~ G~ i
r Cf/NETAgV o ~ O,`~~G w
l~ ° 3 9'1.2' OR O`~ CJ VV vPR RI ~
&7
tµON /
NORFO6 K ~
50UTNERN ~
eRro4e ~r74 ~ ~
BaANGK ~
i
NOTES:
1. THIS PUT lS BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY.
Z. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT
OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY
EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THIS PROPERTY
NOT SHOWN HEREON.
3. IRON PINS SET AS SHOWN.
4. THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN
A 100 YEAR FL000 BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED
BY FEMA. THIS OPINION !S BASED ON AN
INSPECTION OF FL000 INSURANCE RATE AIAP
,510190 0075 A, ZONE A-12, ANO HAS NOT
BEEN VERIFIED WITH ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS.
PLAT SHOWING
2.030 AC. TRACT OF LAND
(TAX #73.00-1 -7)
BEING CONVEYED TO THE
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF
~yzx of SUPERVISORS
~~
Dl
"P
11
, B Y
8,~EE
7, JOSEPH H. DAMS &
RENDERS N, JR. a
6 ~~~~~'
~ SUZANNE WIDNEY
' I
No. 1480 (FORMERLY SUZANNE K. DAMS)
t
~ oq~ CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
~~",
SURvD' ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: 1q- NOVEMBER 1991
LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES
P. C
,
.
ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMM. #91-478
~~7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 25 AND SECTION 15.1-238 OF
THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950 (AS AMENDED), AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF A 2.030-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H.
DAVIS AND SUZANNE K. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW
RESERVOIR PROJECT BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, including the
construction of a water supply system, pump station, and reservoir,
has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of
Roanoke County.
2. That the project is necessary for the general health,
safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a
long-term water source in Roanoke County.
3. That acquisition of a certain parcel of land, consisting
of 2.030 acres, is necessary for construction of the major access
road to the reservoir and the pump station.
4. That the parcel of land required for this phase of the
project is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney and is
more particularly described as follows:
All that certain parcel of land, together with any
improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and
appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Catawba
Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, shown
and designated as "2.030 ACRES -- D.B. 1035, PG. 474"
upon the plat, dated 14 November 1991, made by Lumsden
Associates, P.C., attached hereto as Exhibit A. This
being all of the same real estate conveyed unto Joseph H.
Davis and Suzanne K. Davis, now Suzanne K. Widney, by
deed dated February 4, 1976, from Margaret M. Kelly, of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1035, Page 474.
The above-described parcel is designated on the Roanoke
County Land Records as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7.
~-7
5. That the fair market value of the property is $4,800.00,
which is hereby offered to the property owners for purchase of fee
simple, marketable title to the subject parcel by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter
upon and take possession of such property and commence construction
of said water supply system, pump station and reservoir and any
other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more
adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and to
institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to
the above-described property as provided by law.
7. That a certified copy of this resolution, to be sent by
certified mail to Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney, on or
before November 22, 1991, shall constitute notice to said property
owners of the offer to purchase as set forth above and the intent
to enter upon and take possession of said property to commence
construction, as provided for in Section 15.1-238 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950 (as amended).
7. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 25 and Section
15.1-238 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), the Board does
hereby invoke all and singular the rights, privileges, and
provisions as to the vesting of powers in the County under the
Virginia General Condemnation Act (§25-46.1, et sea., of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, (as amended), and Section 15.1-238, all as made
and provided by law.
8. That the County Administrator and the County Attorney are
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions
~~
as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition through eminent
domain proceedings, or otherwise.
c:\wp51 \agenda\realeat\davis. Aso
fr
cn~r~ . 15 ~ ) ~ 8 l
~~~-~ , '~~ ~ ~~t~.bl~~c~
~~C 1~ ~- ~~~l~C~'\ L-~~ is ~~ ~~Ci ~~ ~ ~) ~ ~~.~<~ . ~~~~ ~ 3-~_ ~ ~ -
C~ `C' c ~ `~ ~ t~~; ~ ~-~ ~1 J CZ 17 L~ l 1. ~.~ C~ S ~ ~ y~~ c;~ C~ ~~ Li ~ ~
E~ \:. r vac - ~---
~- ~, c.~~~~.~
`~ a 9~~,
='~
~t. :,,,,~ ~~'~
F-, `-.:
/.
~, ~ c- ~.~
.<,.; ..~
ACTION # A-111991-9
ITEM NUMBER ~"' (~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Request to Amend Engineering Services Agreement with
Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern for Spring Hollow
Construction Management
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~.-,~
BACKGROUND'
In October of 1984, the County entered into an agreement of
engineering services for Spring Hollow Reservoir. Those services
included design and construction management. The agreement
identified a completion date of August 1988 (3.6 years).
With the delays in permitting and financing approvals, the
project will now be completed in May of 1994.
Along with cost increases of the delay, inspection services
have increased with the RCC method of construction. The RCC method
requires additional quality control measures that add to the work
effort.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The staff has negotiated a new fee that reflects the cost
increases of personnel and overhead during the 6-year delay and the
additional quality control and inspection work required with the
RCC dam.
A negotiated "cost not to exceed" fee of $1,800,000 has been
agreed upon by staff and Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern. This
fee will include all work required by HSMM, their subcontractors,
and all testing services during the construction phase of the
project. Costs will be monitored by staff to help control actual
costs. Payments will be made only for work performed up to the
"not to exceed" amount.
~-S
FISCAL IMPACT•
Funds are available from Bond proceeds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary amendment to the Engineering
Services Agreement with Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
~ `~
~~
ohn R. bbard, P.L. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistan County Administrator County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
motion to approve
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
ACTION NO.
A-111991-10
ITEM NUMBER ~'""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Revised Capital Improvement Program:
Review Process and Calendar of Events
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : f~ ~ryLrns~ ~'~ `~'" "~ C
BACKGROUND•
The Capital Improvement Program: FY 1992-1996 was the first five
year CIP approved by the Board of Supervisors since FY 1986-1987.
Each year, it is the County's intention to reevaluate and update
the CIP, extending the useful life of the County's capital planning
into the future. The CIP is prepared by the Department of
Management and Budget in conjunction with the Department of
Planning and Zoning. Its implementation rests with the Board of
Supervisors through its adoption of the CIP and incorporation of
projects annually in the County's capital budget. Thus, an item's
inclusion in the CIP does not necessarily indicate a funding
commitment by the governing body.
With the development of the "team approach" to decision making,
staff submitted the CIP process to the Facilities Management Team
for review. Based upon the Team's evaluation of the criteria and
process used in FY 1991-1992 and based upon a survey of nine other
Virginia counties, the Facilities Management Team prepared for
Board approval, a report of their recommended changes to the CIP
process. The survey of other Virginia counties is attached for
your review.
Staff believes these recommendations will better structure the CIP
review process, and will provide the necessary guidance for those
County Departments that submit CIP projects.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Facilities Management Team CIP recommendations are as follows:
~D-9
1. A ten member CIP Review Committee would be established to
review and rank all CIP projects submitted by the department
directors. It is proposed that the Review Committee would be
comprised of the Directors of Budget and Planning, a
representative of each of the five "Teams", an Assistant
county Administrator, a school Hoard Representative, and an
Employee Advisory Committee member. The Departments of
Planning and Hudget would provide staff support for the
Committee.
The Facilities Management Team believes that the Review
Committee approach is in keeping with the new organizational
structure and will increase representation, ownership and
support in the CIP process.
2. The CIP period should remain at five years.
The five-year time horizon seems to be typical among the
jurisdictions surveyed.
3. The definition of a "capital project" for inclusion in the CIP
would change from $50, 000 and a seven year life, to $25, 000 and
a seven year life.
The Team interpret's this definition to mean that no grouping
of similar projects would be allowed to meet the $25,000
minimum. Each project must be evaluated individually based
upon its own merits. The CIP Review Committee would evaluate
the possibility of grouping similar projects on a case-by-case
basis.
Also, capital projects submitted for inclusion in the CIP would
not be submitted in the departmental operating budget. Only
capital projects valued at less than $25,000 would be funded
within target. CIP projects would be approved as a package and
funded through the Capital Fund for monitoring purposes.
4. Repair and maintenance items and vehicle replacements would
continue to be eligible for inclusion in the CIP.
It was the consensus of the Facilities Management Team that
routine maintenance and repair items should not normally be
funded through a CIP. However, given the magnitude of the
County's maintenance and repair needs, the Team believed that,
for now, the CIP is the only feasible way of setting priorities
for, and the funding of these needed improvements.
It was also the consensus of the Team that a vehicle
replacement policy should be developed in the future. However,
because of the economic downturn and the County's current
2
~5
inability to fund a vehicle replacement account, vehicle
replacements over $25,000 in value should continue to be
included in the CIP process.
5. New CIP projects suet be subaitted for funding no earlier than
the third year of the CIP. Bsaeptions would be allowed for
emergencies.
In FY 1991-1992, projects were submitted for funding in any of
the five CIP years. Requiring that projects be submitted no
earlier than the third year forces departments to think long-
range when evaluating their capital needs. The survey of other
Virginia localities indicated that approximately one-half of
those surveyed had similar requirements.
6. That a two-tier ranking system be utilised to evaluate eligible
CIP projects. The first ranking would use a qualitative
approach (urgent, essential, necessary, etc.). These
definitions can be found on page 6 of this report. The second
ranking would be numerical or quantitative and would prioritise
the projects as first, second, third, etc. under each of the
qualitative headings based on its numerical scoring.
All but one of the localities surveyed, currently uses the
qualitative approach. One locality is considering a change to
a quantitative method, but has not yet done so.
If the two-tiered ranking system is approved, the quantitative
ranking methodology would need to be developed by the
Facilities Management Team and reviewed by the Planning
Commission. Staff would anticipate bringing the proposed
methodology to the Board for approval within 45 days.
7. Recommend that the Board approve the attached CIP calendar for
FY 1992-1993.
This proposed calendar of events corresponds to the Budget
calendar so that capital funding decisions can be made in
conjunction with the normal budget process.
FISCAL IMPACT•
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the adoption of the revised CIP process and
proposed calendar of events as prepared by the Facilities
Management Team.
3
~-y
Respectfully submitted,
Reta R. Busher
Director, Management
and Budget
Approved by,
~~ ~,~
Elmer C. odge
County Administrator
-~
Terrance L. Harringto
Director, Planning a Zoning
ACTION
Approved (x ) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
Denied ( ) motion to approve Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
cc: File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Terrance Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
VOTE
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
4
~-9
O
Q
34
d
W I
U
< n
rZ
O
_Z ¢ '
~ '
0
ao
v ~, i
Z
O
oC
•
~yQ
6
D
V w
~ ~ ~ ~
W U
W Qy
Z Y ~
oy J
(l J ~ Q
(s =
¢
Z
~ O
~ ~ W
~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~
Wp<
W
O W
~
aG=
`
~ mm
d
Z ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~~
p
W W
~
~ Z 8
~ ~ Z ~
`~
~ W Z
~ ~
W
~
~ ~ rC
` ~
~
~ ~ y~
Y~
~
~
2
W Z N
(~ ~>
~
Z
5 ~
W N
O Z ~
Z~
~ m
7 a
s t1_ O~ Z~ ~
LLl
~ ¢ 2
2~
~
U T
V~
~ j
VVV. y~~
10y IGGGWy _ 1
~iJ
W Q
Z~ ~
W ~ ~
~
_ ~
~
~ ~
~
O
~ 1y
00 _~
d ~ ~ vV ` m z
4.
4
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 3 ~ ~
~ O
~ ~ ~ W
~ o f
~
W
W
W
3
~
W~ 7
W
~~ ~
~~ ~1
YU
O W
~ g ~~~~
N 8
~Z~
6 ~
Z
i
2
Z W J ~ J
~_~~
~
2
2
2
Z_
6 N d Z
i ~~'
z ~ O
= W
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ W
~ W
~
p
~ 8 Q
Q
' Q
R Q
t O
g ~$ W
/~
g
F
d
NS 7{
_a
• Y
Q
M W
V Z
OJ
Q x~
1~
~ ~ Z
Z V
a V
~
Z
= O
Q~
<
5
~ ~ ~ ~
W
W
• > Y > ~ ~ ~ T
O F r
~
W `~
J
Z J
W A
2 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DEFINITION OF RANKINGS
FY 1992-93
Urgent Projects (U)
Projects that cannot reasonably be postponed; projects that would remedy a
condition dangerous to public health, welfare, or safety; projects required to
maintain a critically needed departmental program; projects needed to meet an
emergency situation.
Essential Projects (E)
Projects required to complete or make fully usable a major public improvement;
projects required to maintain a minimum standard as part of a continuing
departmental program; projects for which outside funds for over 65 percent of the
costs are available for only a limited period.
Necessary Projects (N)
Projects that should be carried out within a few years to meet clearly
demonstrated anticipated needs; projects designated for replacement of
unsatisfactory or obsolete facilities; projects designated for remodeling for
continued use.
Desirable Projects (D)
Adequately planned projects needed for the expansion of current departmental
programs; projects designed to initiate new programs that are considered proper
for a progressive community in competition with other communities; projects for
the conversion of existing facilities to other uses.
Acceptable Projects (A)
Adequately planned projects that could be used for ideal operations, but that can
be postponed without detriment to present operations if budget reductions are
necessary.
Deferrable Projects (DEF)
Projects that are definitely recommended for postponement or elimination from
immediate consideration in the current capital program since they are questionable
in terms of overall needs, adequate planning, or proper timing.
6
D-9
11/19/91
COIIl~iTY OF ROANOEB
PROP088D CALENDAR OF BVS~i'P8
FY1993-1997 CAPITAL IKPROV8M8NT PROGRAM
FY1992-93
Date Activity
November 19, 1991 Present proposed CIP Process to Board
of Supervisors.
November 29, 1991
January 6, 1992
January, 1992
February, 1992
March, 1992
April, 1992
Distribute CIP forms and instructions
to Department Directors and
Constitutional Officers.
CIP Project Request Forms submitted
to Department of Management and
Budget.
Board of Supervisors to set CIP
priorities for FY1992-93.
CIP Review Committee (Taskforce,
Team) to review CIP Project Requests
for accuracy, completeness and rank.
Present draft CIP to Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors.
Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors to hold Public Hearings
on CIP.
May, 1992 Adopt CIP for FY1993-FY1997.
7
A-111991-11
Action Number
Item Number -~° ~ [.,~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HELD AT
THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
SUBJECT: Parking Needs at Roanoke County Courthouse and Jail
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~/~
U~-ti~~uy :%~~6~r ~~ ~' ~2:.cl-d-G~' ~-'"U{ .~CZ.[,~C~ t'a-'~-~'d~ ---Z.u~e~~
,,'' v~ ./
BACKGROUND: Since construction of the County Jail and the Courthouse in
the same block of East Main Street in Salem, the lack of parking space has
been a problem, for employees and for those with business to transact in
those buildings. The few spaces at the rear of the Jail are reserved for
various court officers and judges. To the east, around the small office
building occupied by Sheriff Kavanaugh, there is only very limited space
that can be used for parking.
Until recently, most of the overflow parking was accommodated on
paved areas surrounding a Getty Mart and a vacant restaurant on the north
side of Main Street, across Thompson Memorial Drive from the County
property. The Getty Mart owners have now purchased the vacant restaurant,
which will be razed to allow expansion of the Getty Mart and which will
eliminate the extra parking space.
William Watts is the owner of a 0.68-acre tract bounded by East Main
Street, Craig Avenue, Clay Street, and the Getty Mart property (see plat
attached). He is not willing to sell the land, but rie will give the
County first option on leasing his lot, which could be used for parking.
If Roanoke County does not lease it, he will lease to Allright Parking.
There is no other parking space of adequate size within reasonable
walking distance of these County facilities.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The need for parking space for the Sheriff's
Office and the Courthouse/Jail complex is very real. In addition to
parking for employees, space to park is needed for the citizens,
prisoners' families, lawyers, witnesses, jurors, etc. who must visit these
buildings and for the State Troopers, County Police, and other law
enforcement officers who must appear in court. The employees in these
facilities feel that they are entitled to free parking because no other
group of County employees must pay to park.
RECOMMENDATION: Preliminary negotiations with Mr. Watts indicate he would
lease his lot to the County for around $735 a month, or $8,820 annually.
Since July, 1990, the County's General District and Circuit Courts have
-2- ~-~r~
been collecting a $2 fee on each of their criminal and traffic cases,
which money is to be used solely for construction, renovation, or
maintenance of courthouse or jail and court-related facilities, as
provided in §14.1-133.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. As governing
body, the Supervisors approve disbursement of these funds. Annual revenue
from this source has been around $24,800. I believe that lease of the
Watts property in order to provide parking for the Courthouse/Jail complex
could be considered "maintenance of a court-related facility" and would
be a proper expenditure of this reserve fund.
I recommend that the County Administrator be directed to proceed with
negotiations for a long-term lease with Mr. Watts, at a cost not to exceed
the figure mentioned herein, and that the County Attorney be directed to
prepare the ordinance required in order for the County to enter into such
lease.
FISCAL IMPACT: The lease and upkeep of this parking lot will become an
annual financial obligation which, it is anticipated, can be met from
revenues generated by the special fee collected by the County's General
District and Circuit Courts. An appropriation resolution will be prepared
for your consideration along with the ordinance authorizing a lease
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
4~J
E mer C. Hodg
County Administrator
A C T I O N
Approved (x) Motion by:
Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson motion to
Received ( ) approve
Referred
to
cc; File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Sheriff Kavanaugh
Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, Circuit Court
Theresa Childress, Clerk, General District
Peggy Gray, Clerk, Family Court
G. O. Clemens, Chief Judge, Circuit Court
Edward S. Kidd, Jr., Chief Judge, General
Joseph M. Clarke, II, Chief Judge, Family
McGraw
Nickens
Eddy
Johnson
Robers
Court
V O T E
Yes No
x _
X
x
x
X
Abs
District Court
Court
- ~ ~ '~a~~~~s N~
''~im- ^D , I ~
~. I
e~
h~
o~
:~
V
0
i
__ __ . N
O. G 80 ,4 C,P ~.S
t
h (5~ P.
M
fo,~t
n
~'1 '~ '^
ti ~
~ ~ F ~ ~
~
m
• t~ ~C O(
B p
~ ~ W
„~
T ti
hey
31 c.ts' \ u Q . ~
N a ~ ,~ a
0
4 ~ ~
~
S¢ O
~ 3G.~j o
/0.00 /.
W
~~
o ''' ~
~~~
N ~ V
'ti • Sa 4 • ~ 2 Ol
d-33_-- ~577'43~~ :~&- ~3c~f
NJ,q/N STREET -EAST PLAT nF SU.PVEy
~``~- `1//LL/!-~M lNI~TTS
~ ti, ~LT(f ~ f N. 9. ZG 8 ,/n9. N~•/4125 OF P,QOPERTY nN M.9/N ST,2EET- EAST
of ~• ~ ~ AP:Q/L 3. /974 BET['VEEN
,L 1 Tf/OMPSON ~IEMgR/yL L~,?/VE
~ , NERE.By CEaT/fy TH~oTTN/S
'G^' C.eA/G AVE. ¢ CLAY STQEET
C,1;,~~ DlCR Z rLAT Of suave- Is cnaRECT .$19LEM YlR6/N/A
S i
1 - 'V i
• ~ 9r: oovin ns cK ,! ASSncnw~~s
i
I ~ ;` ~ ~ ENGiNFEK S ,f S[/.QVEyO.QS I
',~~~~ I G2a~ ~.~iTt~= APP/L 3 /97¢ .SCi9~ E ~ /•• - 30~ i
- •r.,~ ~ ---- - •-- - -......
W
n\
G
~r -~
Q C~ ~Q
C ~ Q
S~ ~ M
.C ~ q
m
c ~ N~
`~ v
A ~1 P N
`.1' .~+ ry
~~ ~ ~ o
~ ~
N
M
~ C,~qy STREET
I12.3a
77' 3/'E.-` /01.32
N N.1 = /9'w•
'
- .
98.08 8.53
v
q
TAN. =.9.¢¢ ;
o
ARc`/6.f7 ~
h "`
,QAD. - /2.5~ ~ ~
~ o
~
~ ~ ~
6c. Q6' n1 F owceN.Wb
I 48.9' r.6"
1 W
~ / - srn.vy k h o
1 ~ Bc~iGnilvG ~~ n M
j ~ O2 ~o~
I ~r ~~
4S~,f 71'
' /.6~
I
~,
I I,7• ~
q, s'
Rr'OF OVERHANG JJ
D. 789 ,4 cR Fs
?n,Q~ ~ ~- ~~ --~- 1 a.
I
ZI /-sr~QY Ii
ZI
~L~ ~ BQ/CK ~
BUILDING ~ ~
Ij
I ~
C 4.3~ 1C
I
ei /•~' `+~~`
~° OI ~nNC. WA !~
rr
~ ~~
~-~ -.-- ~ 1
0
r r ~' N
•r °'
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO . ~" ~ "'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and
First Reading for
Rezoning Ordinances
Consent Agenda
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND'
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by
adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items.
The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the
substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather
approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County
Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second
reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing
on these ordinances is scheduled for December 17, 1991.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 3.59 acres from Neighborhood
Conservation to Principal Industrial and to rezone said
property from R-1 to M-1 and obtain a Special Exception
Permit to construct an office to be used in conjunction
with the manufacturing and warehousing operation, located
at the northwest corner of Enon and Walrond Drive,
Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of James
C. Wilson.
2. An ordinance to amend conditions and to rezone
approximately 2.43 acres from B-2 to B-2 and M-1 to
operate a new auto dealership and auto collision repair
facility, located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District upon the petition of Vito DeMonte.
3. An ordinance to rezone 0.10 acres from B-3 to B-2 to
operate a used household appliances shop, located at 1806
Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District
upon the petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr.
G~-3
2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
(1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of
these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling
the second reading and public hearing for December 17,
1991.
(2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is,
approved and concurred in as to each item separately set
forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk
is authorized and directed where required by law to set
forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation
for any such item pursuant to this action.
Respectfully submitted,
~ Y1 .~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Vote
No Yes Abs
G-I
Date Rec.:
Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
ROANOKE COUNTY LAND IISE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name: Whorley W. Sink Phone: 703-366-7942
Address : 7802 Enon Drive, Roanoke. VA 24019
2. Applicant's Name: James C. Wi Ison Phone: _703-362-3657
Address: P. O. Box 7311, Roanoke, Virainia 24019
3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Enon and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond
Tax Map Number(s) : Part of 27.06-3-4 27 06-3-9 27 06-3-7 and 27 06-3-6
4. Magisterial District: Hol I ins
5. Size of Property: 3.59 acres more or less
6. Existing Zoning: R-1
7. Existing Land Uses: Vacant and res ident is I with garage apartrrpnt
8. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighborhood conservation
9. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal industrial
10. The Following Items Must IBe Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete.
X Letter of Application
X Vicinity Map
X Statement of Justification
(Please complete below.)
;( Application Fee
X List of Adjacent Owners
il. Please explain, in detail, how this request conforms to the Land
Use Determinants of the Roanoke County Comprehensive
P1 an: 1. The area is one in which industry has historically developed.
2. There are existing industrial zonir~ areas immediately adjacent.
3. The topography is generally flat or gently sloping allowing for
reasonable development.
4. ll~e property is outside the flood plain.
5. Resources are not threatened.
6. Utilities are availat3le.
~ LnR OFFICCS ~ ~
' ~
OSTERHOIIDT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE
n PROFESSIONAL CORPORnTION
1919 ELECTRIC ROnD, S W
CHARLES H.OSTERH0007 P O BOX 20068 TELEPHONE
MICHAEL S. FERGVSON
ROANOKE
VIRGINIA
703-'7'-"°'
EDWARD A. NATT ,
MICHAEL J. AHERON 24OI V FAX NO.
G. STEVEN AGEE
703.774-096+
MARK D. KIOO
October 29, 1991
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Re: Request for Land Use Plan Amendment
Gentlemen:
This is to advise that our firm represents James C. Wilson who
has petitioned the Board of Supervisors to rezone a parcel of land
situate in North County and described in the attached Land Use Plan
Amendment Application. Mr. Wilson intends to lease the land to
Dragon Corporation for a future expansion for office and
warehousing for that corporation.
In order to accomplish the above, and to be consistent with
the County's comprehensive plan, the property needs to be
reclassified from neighborhood conservation to principal
industrial. It is felt that, because of the nature of the
surrounding properties, this proposed change will have very little
effect on the surrounding area. The surrounding area is basically
principal industrial and commercial in nature.
The justification for the amendment using land use
determinants is set for on the attached Application.
It is respectfully requested that the Board of Supervisors
approve this land use plan amendment.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT,
AHERON & AGEE, P.C.
Edward A. Natt
EAN/dle
Enclosures
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
j, Case No.:____--
Ord. No.
r ~~ ~~ ~f
1. Ovner's Name: Whorley W. Sink Phone: 703-366-7992
Address: 7802 Eason Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019
2. Applicant's Name: James C. wiison Phone: 703-362-3657
Address : P• ~• Box 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019
3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Eason and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond
Tax Map Number(s) : Part of 27.06-3-4, 27.06-3-9, 27.06-3-7 and 27.06-3-6.
4. Magisterial District:
5. Size of Property:
Hollins
3.59 acres, more or Tess
6. Existing Zoning: R-1
Existing Land Use: vacant and residential with garage ap artment
7. Proposed Zoning: NI-1 with special exception for_off.ice use in M-1, if necessary
Proposed Land Use: off ice txii IdinaP and warehouse
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighs t~orhood C~n~ervation and Principal (r~dustrial.
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes X No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
' Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ~~ -approximately $30,000.00
- approxima e y 'completion
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
X Letter of Application X Concept Plan
~_ Metes and Bounds Description -~- List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~- Vicinity Map
~_ Application Fee ~- Written Proffers
~_ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agent:
Signature--~tLz..~ ~ ~V~; _~~,,r-- Date ~~\2.3.~..° ~
L10. ~~ffICES ~~
OSTERHO~DT, FERGIISON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE
A PROFE)SIONAL CORPORATION
CHARLES H. OSTERHOU DT
MIG HAEL S. FERGUSON
EDWARD A. NATT
MICHAEL J. AHERON
G. STEVEN AGEE
MARK D. KIDD
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W
P O BOX 20068
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018
October 24, 1991
of Roanoke County
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Sirs:
TELEPHONE
Boa-»~- I I O
~~~ FAX NO.
~i 7 096'
' 1
ocr ,~ 19 1~~'
91
pl.~k;i~lalJt+K, Zaiij,;,1G ~,
~yy W~.~r1Eih~j
This letter is in support of the rezoning request of James C.
Wilson to rezone property situate at the intersection of Walrond
Drive and Enon Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District from
Residential District R-1 to Industrial District M-1 with an
additional request for a special exception for office use in M-1,
if such is necessary.
As the Board is aware, Dragon Corporation is presently located
in Roanoke County on property immediately adjacent to the subject
property. The business needs to enlarge its facilities, both in
the area of office space and in warehouse space.. The proposed
office expansion is necessary immediately. The first phase of the
warehouse expansion containing approximately 24,000 square feet is
to be undertaken in the near future and a second addition is
proposed containing an additional 24,000 square feet of warehousing
space for sometime in the future. This rezoning request would
enable the above to be permitted under the provisions of the
ordinance.
As stated above, the immediate needs include an office
facility of approximately 5,500 square feet and a 24,000 square
fcot warehouse. These additions are showr_ on the concept plan
prepared by Ernie Rose, Architects, Inc., which is submitted with
and made a condition of the rezoning request. The concept plan
also shows a second future warehouse addition of approximately
24,000 square feet.
The site plan also includes the necessary screening and
buffering to comply with the provisions of the county ordinance as
well as the necessary parking spaces. Since the project will
include truck traffic, a sufficient area within the property is
reserved for truck movement. Also, the ingress and egress are
designed with the truck movement in mind.
We would respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors
approve this request pursuant to the provisions of the County
G-
ordinance.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, MATT,
AHERON & AGEE, P.C.
~a~~
Edward A. Natt
EAN/dle
F
ROANOKE COUNTY ''
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION LSE
1. :,policant's Nam:~: James C. Wilson
G-~
p:.~,~,~ 703-362-3657
Address: P. O. Box 7311
Roanoke, Virginia Zip: 24019
2. Property owner's name Whorley W. Sink
Address: 7802 Enon Drive
Phone: 703-366-7992
Roanoke, VA Zip; 24019
3. Location of Property: Northwest corner of Er~on and Walrond Drive fronting Walrond
Size of property 3.59 acre$cresrsge~t.
Size of proposed special exception use 3.59 acres moreaco~'e~.ft.
Part of 27.06-3-4,27.06-3-9
4. Tax Map #: _ _ _ _ Old Tax Map #:
5. Zcning Classification: R-1
6. Magisterial District Location: Hol I ins
7. Existing Land Use• Vacant and residential with garage apartment
8. Proposed Special Exception Use: Construction of approximate 5,500
square foot office in N4-1 District to be used in conjunction with manufacturing
a ware ousing ope a i
9. Comprehe nsive Plan Designation: Neighborhood Conservation and Principal
' sal
10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue:
Value of Land A~~ab~ly `helve of Proposed Buildings approximately 500,000
at completion
Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed
11. Check Completed Items:
X 8~" x 11" plot plan X Consultation
_~ List of adjacent property owners X Letter of Application
%~ Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke"
$20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage a:~d
refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport
$40 All other Special Exception Uses
12. Date of Application: Qctober 24, 1991
13. Applicant's Signatures J\pN„~,~
"~~~~n U•,. nay O - ./
i
~~
t
Written Proffers - Petition of James C. Wilson
October 8, 1991
The undersigned does hereby voluntarily proffer the following
conditions in connection with the above rezoning.
1. That the property will be developed in substantial
conformity with the concept plan prepared by Ernie Rose,
Architects, Inc..
C~~~~vR~
Whor~ley Sink
~~ '~, .
James__~ Wilson
z
w
a
O
w
w
Q
W ~
~ Z
Q Z~
w °Z
~~
C!~ 3 0
O "
~~.'' CJ Y
ON ~O
~" ~ O
a ;~
Q iq ~~ _
~ e
~ -_
~
~~ ~_
„~ ~~
~ m K
,- ,;
~~ ~~
~Q ~~,
.n .~m
~ y
c
~
i
~ 3
~ ~
~- e
~~ ~~~
_n ~~~,
_ _` ~aa~; `\ `
__,~ ~s v,;~, , ~
~ `\
~~ ~ ~
G-I
~~
ani~Q uou3
ROAIAORE COONTY
UTILITY DEPARTMEN?
APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
TO
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Date
Name Of AppliCant~ James C. Wilson phone 703-362-3657
Addzess of Applicant_ P. O. Sox 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019
Name of Developer James C. Wilson Phone 703-362-3657
Address of Developer P. O. Sox 7311, Roanoke, VA 24019
Name of Design Engineez
Ernie Rose
Phone 804-747-1305
Address of Design Engineer 4192 Innslake Drive, Glen Allen, VA 23060
Name of Contact Person James C. Wi Ison
Name of Proposed Development
Type of Development and proposed number of units ()3e specific)
approximately
One story office buildiru~ containinq~5,500 square feet with an adjoining
one story warehouse containing 24,000 ~c~uare feet and a future addition containing
24,000 square feet.--site covera~.~e being 51.717. ~'
Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) : Approximately 3.59
acres beginning at the Northwest corner of Enon S Walrond Drive fronting Walrond
a ~
corner
of Nanspile property thence parallel that line to Enon Drive and from that point of
beginning.
Size of proposed development in acres: 3.59 Acres
Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which
the individual water/sewer service connections would be located:
Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL
Is this application for a development that will be a part or
section of a larger future development? No _~_ Yes
If yes, provide map of entire area if available.
(OVER)
~,
~~
-~"
8' ature of Applicant
~ ~ ~ '- ~ _ 1
~, ~ , ~ ~.
m ~ ~ ~
o ~ ~, _ ~ - ~
''~ '4
~~
~~ - - - 1-
,, ; i , -~ -
•
~- ;F
l}
i ~ ~ ~' _ ~ _ ~ Q ?
~ %~
o __
,, ( ,
~ / ,.
~` ~ ` ` ,
I ..
~ w \~~ ~
~. ~~~ ~ ~,
l ~
•~
\` ~ - ,~
~ ~ % _ ~1'
l
w~
~ \ 1 p
O ~ l
~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~~ \
_ ~ ~ ~ ~~
Et• IN -~OT~1~ _; QLE ~~~ ~ ~ J ~ _
tE NOUsiNG ! ~ - ~ '~ ~ CONT LR ~r
I ( ~ ~ i'
otis o~ __ ~~ / S ~ GR p 8~qs N ~,~~ 1~ ~ _
~~~~ CEO _ -1 S _,'! ~` _ `r ~~.. ~ p ~~4 4:.STaY~LAyE L 1NATf ~Y M
~-~. -
o
. o ~ ,.
-- ~ ~
~ ~ -
1~ - ` 1\
/ I 0 N, 0 ~,
.. • ~~ i { ~
,~
' " ,~ ~ ~ ( w
too
/~~
_ _ ~ P Q'~
\ I / \
A
~; / - u
~ o' ~
} 4-Z9-10 ~ l ..
CA . ~ '''' a ~ 1 )
~~y~9-e o ! o ~ >
_ r
~ 4 T A ~ - 1~ ~
-fit 1 J ~ ~ 'Y ~ ~ r ~-~
/ 1A
~ ~ ~R~•: ~''~'1~ 1. ~ o ~ 9^-10 I 1
'Mi5 -~- ,W1$ FiM4MCE0 iN •~ T ~. ~ •} P ~ `~~' ~
-hN~ RMT ~ROr ~~~' MOUS~MG, ~~ ~ `
' V \ ~
til r M „~*~ROV~S~ JOR 1
~ V- I ~'p -~~aa .. ~ ~ Cam.. '~1 ~ ~ ,
~~6 AGT Oi ~95Y 1f aENOEO
} .~ R o .
~ ~ ' ~ fi' ~ / / 1 I ~
~~ ~~ ~~
~yRyR}.a.,1. 4'k ~~i: i'~iQ~:Yw: -_ .~I.tlaD'~l!1A.'4a."t:. .':^'L ~ ~ ~, ~... . ~ n ~ N ~a /~ ~ . - ... a ~ ~ ~... ~ a.. , . i.~+~t~.K ~i ~ ~ F
COMMUNI71'SBRVICl~S James C. Wilson
/MIII1RVl~I/1PA~IR111'l' R-1 to F4_1
Date Rec.:_
Received By:
Case No.: _
Ord. No..
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name: Robert C. Bell Phone: 981-0353
Address: c/o R. Calvin Bell, 517 Walnut Ave., S.F.., Roanoke, VA 24014
2. Applicant's Name: Vito DeMonte
Phone:(804)?_37-3111
Address: 3725 Wards Road, Lynchburg, Virginia 24502
3. Location of Property: 4037 Electric Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24014
Tax Map Number(s): 87.07-1-39; 87.07-1-40; 87.07-1-41
4. Magisterial District: Cave Sprin
5. Size of Property:
2.43 acres
6. Existing Zoning:B-2 General Commercial District with conditions
Existing Land Use: Unoccupied Building, formerly new automobile dealership;
B- General Commercial District,( s to Dart) and
7. Proposed Zoning: M-~ Light Industrial District wit~i conditions
l~ew auto dealership (as to dart);
Proposed Land Use: auto collision rep ~r f il, ~ s o _a r_),
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Core
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes X No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of tte Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
X Letter of Application X Concept Plar,
X Metes and Bounds Description X List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) X Vicinity MaF
X Application Fee X Written Prof°ers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applica~le)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract
Or Owner' s A ent • ~
• Purchaser,
, ;'
~
Ro er
C. Bell t
~
~~
Signature B ~ ~ ~ ~.,
Date ~d
. Calvin ell,
his attorney-in- act
Vito Monte •
B - -
-~
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 2.43-acre parcel of land at )
4037 Electric Road, S. W. ) PETITION OF
Roanoke County Tax Parcels ) VITO DEMONTE
87.07-1-39, 87.07-1-40, 87.07-1-41 )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Your Petitioner, Vito DeMonte ("DeMonte"), files this
petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, to show the following:
1) DeMonte has contracted to purchase the referenced
parcel of land.
2) Robert C. Bell, the owner of the land, has consented
to this petition and related application.
3) The property is presently zoned under the provisions
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-2 General Commercial
District, subject to proffered conditions.
4) The property is designated "Core" in the Future Land
Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan.
5) The 2.43-acre tract is depicted on Exhibit A. DeMonte
desires that the portion of the property situated north of the
broken line identified as "zoning line" be B-2 General
Commercial District, subject to no proffered conditions, and
that the remaining portion of the property (that is, south of
Wetherington the "zoning line" ) be rezoned to M-1, Light Industrial District,
~~ Melchicxuia
subject to the conditions proffered with this petition.
c-a
6. The parcel for which rezoning is sought is more fully
described in Exhibit B attached hereto.
WHEREFORE, DeMonte respectfully requests that the Zoning
Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above
referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 5.
FURTHER, DeMonte further requests that this petition be
referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning
Commission for its consideration and recommendation.
Respectfully submitted,
Vito De onte
Counsel for e itioner
Vito DeMonte
c/o Donald L. Wetherington
Wetherington & Melchionna
P. O. Box 90
1100 Crestar Bank Building
Roanoke, Virginia 24002
Wetherington
~~ Mekhionr-a
2
~i- -.
~IONNO C; s> 2
Oa m Z 0 9 N O
> Cm-1 A Z; m
a x3x
9 - -i 2 ••
< A Z C N O N m
m O m D m O1 11 3 ti
.S ~ 9N K> x
O>OCm NOS
9 N O N 'A K~ m N
mom< mm
ooooi>n .°n~K~
m T x T o z~ >
>- 9m 2N-1
> a3•~ N m2
C JC > Z> 2 m- C
-1--i--1-OA-1>
02mN Z NZN
O OC'TZO T m9
O (10f -9mOKP
00[t> N9!->f m
K S)-1 00-1 d
VK -Ia mo>
0--->NOOA
~CON3-1C •im
2 2 2 m m D P 2 0
AO H• O<m1
O m<O ~1
H < - 2 A
Z N• O
m m =
v
I
I
~ le
t ~', 3
::~_,; I
'~;=
t~1if I
n
e ~
o~e~
~ a j3
~ i
O
~ ~
Z
R
zfi~S
'~~: i
:~n
a!a 0
:d~ga
•i
•+~
,~
~, ~ ~~~
,\
~ ~~
\\\ ~~ 4.4 +e+~
F ~•~-_
a ~C7it7 \\
1 \
4/9
~~ ~)y ~y0
<\
\` •, ~
aa ~
8.a
}j ~Y
8 y
.",.R
6Y
a
a
r
_ S~i
L
P
r
E
i
~.~' \ 1
\~•
I
x
s,
~.
l_
-- __ f
,> >ot _ _
i
4
~+ I 1
G-~
EXHIBIT B
BEGINNING at~an iron pin on the southeasterly side~of
Virginia State Primary Route 419, said point being Point
1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat and being the
northeasterly corner of the property herein described and
adjacent to the property of Atalantis Group, Inc.; thence
leaving Route 419 and with the line of Atalantis Group,
Inc., property, S. 45 degrees 45' 00" E. 402.6 ft, to
point 2, a fence post corner, corner to the property of
Emma S. and Earl S. Cunningham; thence leaving the
Atalantis Group Property and with the line of the
Cunningham ,property the following three courses and
distances: S. 50 degrees 30' 00" W. 131.3 ft. to point
3, marked by an iron pin; thence N. 45 degrees 07' 2$~~ W.
89.33 ft. to a fence post corner, being corner 4; thencE
S. SI degrees 40' 00" W. 232,10 ft. to an existing iron
pin, being corner 5, said point being on the
northeasterly side of a 20 foot read right-of-way; thence
with said road, N. 43 degrees 08' 00" W. 99.2 ft. to
existing iron pin, being paint 6, said point being corner
to the property of John H. Lipscomb and David A. McCray;
thence with the Lipscomb and McCray property the
following four courses and distances: N. 41 degrees 03'
00" E. 232.71 ft. to an iron pin at canner 7; thence N.
49 degrees Ol' I1" W. 163.11 ft. to an existing iron pin
at corner 8; thence S. 40 degrees Ol' S6" W. 9 ft. to a
fence post at corner 9 and N. 47 degrees 52' 59" W, g~,69
ft. to an iron pin at corner 10, said point being on the
southeasterly side of Routa 419; thence with the
southeasterly side of Route 419 the following two courses
and distances, with a curve to the right having a radius
of 929.93 ft., a chord bearing of N. 58 degrees 07' 01~~
E., an arc distance•of 80.38 ft. to an iron pin at corner
11; thence N. 66 degrees 42' 0" E. 169.3 ft. to an iron
pzn at corner 1, the place of BEGINNING; and
Containing 2.43 acres and being as more particularly
shown on Plat of Survey dated June 3, 1985 made by Buford
T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C,, Engineers - Surveyozs,
BEING the same property conveyed to Robert C. $ell by the
following deeds: (l) dated November 2, 1983, recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, in Deed Eook 1200, page 529; and (2)~
dated February 6, 1973, recorded in the Clerk's Office
aforesaid in Deed Baok 965, page 226.
~°~
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 2.43-acre parcel of land at )
4037 Electric Road, S. W. )
Roanoke County Tax Parcels )
87.07-1-39, 87.07-1-40, 87.07-1-41 )
PROFFER OF
CONDITIONS
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
The Petitioner Vito DeMonte hereby voluntarily proffers to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the
following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced
parcel of land.
1. The part of the parcel situated south of the zoning
line on the attached Concept Plan will be used as an automobile
collision repair facility and reasonably incidental and related
purposes.
2. The part of the parcel south of the zoning line may
also be used for the preparation for sale, service and repair of
automobiles in connection with the operation of an automobile
dealership, if any, from time to time on that part of the
property north of the zoning line.
3. No automobiles for which collision repair is scheduled
will be stored outside the building on the property, except in
the parking compound to be located as shown on the attached
concept plan.
V~'ettkringuxi
~Mekhionna 4. The parking compound will be constructed substantially
in the location and according to the specifications detailed on
-~.
the attached concept plan.
5. All conditions previously proffered and adopted in
connection with zoning the property are eliminated. The
conditions set forth in this proffer are the sole conditions
affecting the property.
Respectfully submitted,
Vito DeMonte
By : --
Counsel for Petitioner
Vito DeMonte
c/o Donald L. Wetherington
Wetherington & Melchionna
P.O. Box 90
1100 Crestar Bank Building
Roanoke, Virginia 24002
~tietherington
~ Mekh~ina
2
,~
~~~ sx ,..
~ /
• ~ ~ I ~.,.
2.01
~' ~I i i J
~' " ~
~I `•
' iz~
3 '~ ~ e~
~ ~
_T , ~.
~~ ~
I
r
'~
a
~ ~.
~'
~'
I
.~ _~I-_
~I I
`_ f~
\W ~ ~~~)
N~
\ ~~1 •~~
\y ~ fie. '
\\ ~ba.y
6~~
~~
~~~y
i
,R
~~V
li
~
~
~
'
t;
..
~i~
'
x
t i t
~ f
1!
:~
Y Z
Y `
}
t
3
N~T~
a• ,
h
i
L
~~
~B
~ v\~ ~~)
\ \ \_~,Ji
~ ~e
`` `\
~ ~ i tl
I
I
i ,
~
ci I
~ w
~
Y
44o O
i
~~I {i Rp
it O
U~`1~
Q;sr; {
Q
k$
4;
~,
~~
=lei;'
r., r.
i..,.
I i[it
nisi
I =°ii'-
~i,;,
Ei=~`=.
I
:I
I ~
.,I a
0
L W W
O .N Z
C 2 - Y r
LL O > W O -
rW>O •r O V_
Wi~OrLN00
< m W N C r r 6
aW J< J 6 N< U 0 0
oW¢-~ouo
6Y O26_] 0
W W U r V
N S N 2 N W 2 0
<r¢O-r-r-r
] L W N< r L¢<
rN2 W! -<
< - 2 D LL K> W
1 m Z D i W 0 6 0 0
W 01 > W 6 W -
N W~ Y 2 N 4 N 6'
ON m70<O
Z<r - NLL 6Q
riUNW 6WOW
W N O N~ S C>
~r dra-
_Z=Z
w~xu rw]<¢
rc uaaN uo a
D O Z LL O
2<< C] O N N O LL
~~ ~~'
-~.
i
ROA1901CE COUNTY
UTILITY DEPARTMBNT
APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
TO
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Date October 24, 1991
Name of Applicant Vito DeMonte Phone (804) 237-3111
Address of Applicant 3725 Wards Road, L chburg, Virginia 24502
Name of Developer same Phone
Address of Developer
Name of Design Engineer
Address of Design Engineer
Phone
(or Donald L. Wetherington,
Name of Contact Person Vito DeMonte his attorney 982-3800)
Name of Proposed Development
Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific)
Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map):
Size of proposed development in acres: 2.43 Acres
Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which
the individual water/sewer service connections would be located:
Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL
Is this application for a development that will be a part or
section of a larger future development? No Yes
If yes, provide map of entire area if available.
(OVER)
Signature o Applicant
.D ~~ ~ 1/
.~ 1
~„ ~ .-- ~ ~
a ~:~_ i
r ~
~-
.~ '
~. ~-~
/.
',.
t
~_.,_._.
~ ~ y. M y j~ ~ ,3 77 T
' +~."' a`
•~ y ~ Q 2
., ~ .
~,
r~, ~~
m ~ ,~ y ~,
a hY' y~ O ~ \ ~'. ~ ~ ~:~ t Y'. .'ley
ti ~ ~.
~~~\~ ~ ~ _ ~ \~~\',-off '~ ~Y'`\ ~\ \ < ~y __ ~`1 ,~ ~, ` ~ ~ ~,~`'
'~ ~'~ ' -~--- ~'yn -~ -~ ~~ ~ ~
-" \ ~~~
! ~ r
.'
''*e ~. /.
„~„ ;
. A ~ ~
.. o
~..
. .
1 - s t ~
,. ;
-:.
... . '' '. '~. ..:~. v4 _ '
.,
,~
.yy ~.K r _ ,~ /.
VVJ/ \ _
.:
~ ~
N ,
1
1:
~-
. ".` ~ 3, i ~' ';~~~ ~ Q r ,. _ ~ tai' .""~7r,:.~_
\ti o ,~
~ ~ ~~ ~,
,- , i ~ ~ ~
~ _ ,
u - ,
,. , . . ,
oQ .~ . , _~
_~
+ ,'~. Lq
~ ,. ~- io
,. . _ .
d i
6~ ~
1 ~ 1 ~_ _
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~~ `~
x ~ \`
r-~~ _ `~ \
F ' ~~( i ~
+ ~ ' r..
\~ ~-
~ :~~~ ~- ~ ~o `-
~ ' ~ ~ ~- ~
~ r
~ ~ ~
,. ~ ~ ~ \
~- /
r ~ \~ 1 > ~ /
,,
' ~
~,.
,_, ~ ~ ~ _ -
~- - ~~
.. __
.. ~
V ~ V~`~~ ~ ~~~ x . ~ ~ ~ ~
\ ~ ~ ~ ~ r .,
~V y`v ~ ~
\~ ~ ~ ~ Y - - _ --
~ ' ~~ ti'' /
i f
i ~ ~ ~ a !`
r
~ ~ i ~'"
/ ~ ~ O / O ~
~ ~ _, ~ ._
~"
(~~ i
~~ 1 I i
y
~ ,-
,,, _ _
-- ` , ~ ~ ~ x \ ` ~ ,
,\ ~~ ~ I - _
~/ /r VSf s~
_ ,s
_ -! ~4 ,,~
~ ~ ~ ' ~F~• jG~n4 g •+ ~~~~ ~~, :+ u CIF1~i,~~e'~T `t 4s'.
r ,`
al~f `g Eqpt iyFr,i,,~.,,Q~ f - 'S t~ ~'6 l
JT ~+['y~ i` J'am`. :i<<~'~^k'i'pN Gi.'rMn't~ t..~ ~.~:
xi , ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~-b. ~ ~+
Sp[KK[ ~.
a ~ ~V JCINI TY bIAP i ~ 4J ahµ~
~-
G -~
NORTB
CObl11lUNITY SERVICES V I TO DEf-10NTE
I un nQV~cino~~c~rr TAX f~1AP ~ b7.07-1-39, -40, -41
Date Rec.: r~~
Received By: nti~ ~ ti r•~r ~.-~..f-.,
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
P~AC~~?n3 ISSuFO rn~a~
~'
1. Owner's Name: ~,~,-Pit J, Miles. sr. Phone: 387-0886
Address: 1812 'I"txxnpson Memorial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019
2. Applicant's NaIDe:_ ~erett J. Miles, Sr. Phone: 387-0886
Address: 1812 Tt~npson Memorial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019
3. Location of Property: Roanoke county
Tax Map Number(s):
4. Magisterial District:
36,01-2-3
Catawba
5. Size of Property: 9 q ~ -9 x 7 9• S ~~ ~ 902. 3 sQ- ~'r-
6. Existing Zoning: B-3
Existing Land Use: Used Car zit
7. Proposed Zoning: B-2
Proposed Land Use : Sale of Used H ousehold Appliances
8. Comprehensive Plan Desiqnat ion:
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No x
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of pour applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. a member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
11. The Following Items Kust He Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application
Metes and Bounds Description
of Property (Attach Exhibit A)
Application Fee
Water and Sewer Application
Concept Plan
List of Adjacent Owners
Vicinity Map
Written Proffers
(If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agent:
signature ~ ~7~~ Date /G -- ~ S - g ~
1 J Yt~'+1 't f~~sl~r V~F` / ~+~i iJ~7~,~~, r` /f/4. f~/ 'arx,rwaW .~ y T
a~-~--~-----11 ,JCL J' ~/~C } , ~ .OR{ y I ' ~ 1 ^~' `-v+~ 7 l
-j•,~ t. l -,tl, ' i 11. I/' P ~~~j~ . ~~~ 'r' ~ f ~ ~ `~°"' I,Ci,'
' • ~~:~.. Oc0 y4~r S"f~' : ~ ~ ~~ .,~;:~•'v '•~i~••~ Ii 'Iwf I `~~ (i ~.{'~,~ ~ f'1 ~ •-•'!~i ~ 1
~= •~' ~'`~ ~`~~.f;l•1 ~ I -' ~,` di ' `~• j {~ I ~~ 11 ~ ail ~ ~>I,~~Y[~ f[- .s_ v:
~ ~;~~+ '~ctia •' I l 1 I ;~ I l f _i :, ~i. j c i ''l "' I 'i ~ ~ , µ.(;+yi ~ -•
E ~ ,{I
1 ~6• 1 ~~~-I.7 .a ~~f~~ ~~ ~.i FI. ~ b' , -iii ' i'.1 •;~:,,
~~. +, ~`•'•~+'r .~, wV _~ f ~~ ~r 17r ,i~ r' n f~ 1 ~I~ + '~{!T j~ wA •
;'. .,r• ~, 111 ,("P~i ~+ 1• ~ ~ ,. i,~~~~ l~ ~• it'"'~ N ~1~.~'!-.,
(~-_ f '
~ l ~ ~ W~
.,;
}} ~ ~ ";; °t" a•-srr•!c'~NO~Ee6F~cC~ ~ ~ .,. F ,t 1 ~' 'u y~/~ (( .. ~ ' ~; 'a
s :: ` i r {1)
~'` py •~ ,_r I~. ~ (f ..~ 0 .s r.n~ ~ gyp. !g,'fQ,T ~^
• ~ ,~- i,•
,.~`z 1•>;~+t..j~ ~ ~ '~I'~ NiG7•tf SPv..rv ~' ~I~O qD KJ T L :~
7'TO I+ /QOA/:r j,:'~.. ~ '1 ~,1•~~ A<> ; .. l~~~rl_ •. ~~ ^'}'~"~~~oMC~I~~Ij ~O j;v a"i *"~T~r~is. j_`~.~ ~
L ~.. .. ... - ,amt _ ~ •-~ ~~~ ~,~
.~ ?Y ' ~G; -•-.544'00'}'/ j ~'~ ~ ~iit 'fl~~l~+~,3~ ' ' Q47.•--~'~_ `'~ 'I.:~t.
t-`yam°~~.~i l ~~•1, ,Ii :i •7r• ir11' :i~~~~ Q~ _ -
LBM`~` ~,~ : 1 _ '~ ~l~~yE ~~•I;l • 1 ~~ IY'~i~~'I;' ~~b~i ~~r f{~ ~ ~, ' ~ ~ Y~J fTFx2 '#4 1
t t ~ ~~
I~ ~ ]L r~''f,i ~ }
~ _ r ~1 r ~'I' t i O• ~
~~' , i .,., `~ ' {,, t~~l y, ~.11., [;~~nL~ 11111 r ~ d,~v:;* _ ,
. t t ifs ~ ~ ! 1
f ~ •.~ ~. ~ 1, ~Iil li ,.a:p+ i S i, i~~~a~ ~ .~ ~,•
- L~ . F
~4 ~. ,~ ~, .. .+. s•: alto a P.: ~• '~. ~+,~ ".. 1-;~:~~ ~
;,.' OF,4' ~/BG~~a AGQE '~'~PACT I ,DE/NG ~ CONVEYED
a ,,~ t
' , ,.. ~ _ {_ , ~' ~-~°~a Ali i;~!' ~, ~~tJ~ti~~F~~f ~l
-; `, } ~VEQ~T T :,` ~.:fAC~S~N _/Ii~/_ L•ES ~ . -
~. . ~ }~• ~_. ~, • • S/TU.4T. ,4 T, NflNG~il/6 i ROCf~ ~ /N ~'
K BES$ c`C ~- - ~POANC/l•E~ ,' COUNTY,•'.I I' V,P6/A//A _-
~$!~ r. b" SCALE./..r~0' .1 ~• ,~!OEC'. 5, /9,73 '
107.0,:-~`~ •,~ .~- - ~`1.3y 'r~~ JACK G.' 13E5S
+` `:~~'" ~'t :t. ~ f '" G~~~jR'T/FJED L,.i9n/O SU,P/EYO••P '
~'dcs~` qtr . ~. ..:~7 'l • _,i' ~r of ~~' ,.' t. ~ v' ~ .. +"
!.• 1~ ~.~ ~~ a `..w~I~ ..'•+.C-•i•.lYri`i1P1~u N.. l!. - V ~a y /.+
~~ - - .r.:: a. '_ ._ ....rte
_ _ e
.~,;
_ '. ROA80EE COONTY
OTILIZ7 DEPART!(Eti?
APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SE~tER SERVICE
TO
PROPOSED DEVELOPMEIiT
Date October 24, 1991
Name of Applicant ~erett J, rules, Sr. phone 387-0886
Address of Applicant 1812 Z'Yu7meson yS~norial Drive, Roanoke, VA 24019
Name of Developer Phone
Address of Developer
Name of Design Engineer Phone
Address of Design Engineer
Name of Contact Person Et7erett J. Miles, Sr.
Name of Proposed Development
Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific)
Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) :
Size of proposed development in acres s Acres
Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which
the individual water/sewer service connections would be located:
Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL
Is this application for a development that will be a part or
section of a larger future development? No Yes
If yes, provide map of entire area if availab el .
(OVER)
~-~
_. .
~_ ~ . _~-~
.-
O- J
~ _.:
~~! ~ ~
O- • ~ \\11 ~
~(~L
sY ~ ~ ~~ +
s-~ i
D
Yn~ru
COMMUNITY SERVICES
ANDDEVBLOPJrlEN~' Everett J . ;Miles
33C to ~2 i i
VICINITY MAP
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER fT °'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Acquire Two Parcels of Land from
Canaan Land Company
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : l.G,~'X~wn-z~'Lt-,~~ a,- - ,=~~•c>-vr-c~
~~
BACKGROUND'
During construction of the Roanoke River Interceptor, it was
determined that the sewer line crossing of Poor Mountain Road would
have to be made by boring under the road. This determination was
made by the Highway Department in order to maintain traffic on Poor
Mountain Road during construction. The location of the sewer line,
manhole and boring pit is across two parcels of land owned by
Canaan Land Company. The parcels are 50 feet by 96 feet and 60
feet by 104 feet and are located between Poor Mountain Road and the
Roanoke River.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The two above mentioned parcels have little usable area that is not
located in the floodway. The construction of the water line, sewer
line and manhole on the parcel will further limit the owners use
of the property. During discussions between the owner and the
County, it was agreed that purchase of the land by the County was
preferable to granting of an easement across the land. A purchase
price of $2,000 was tentatively agreed to by the owner and the
County.
Due to the low value of the land under consideration, an outside
appraisal of market value was not made.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Due to the significant portion of the land that would be required
for a water line, sewer line and access easement along with its
associated cost, staff feels there is no alternative to purchasing
the land. Funds are available for the purchase of the land from
the Roanoke River Interceptor Project account.
..
,~ .,
i~-~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that Board approve first reading of the
ordinance authorizing acquisition of two parcels of land from
Canaan Land Company.
SUBMITTED BY:
Cliffor aig, P.E. ~~,
Utility Director
APPROVED:
/~
Elmer C. Hodges
County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
?.~ exi r ^ ` .....
/~ ` 'n= O i
I - __. r•.__ ~. ~~ P~ jF~
GHE~hITS ' I ' ~~ _?' ~ ;~ `~
~' '~u~ i
""~ ` / ` FOFepSM j
~~~ ~ ~
f: ~.
VICINITY MAP
N-~
8
NORTS
~ ____ _ __ ... _ _ __ z _
~ ~ PROPERTY OF y
PpRPR~ o ROGER E. RARDIN
j~ON ~ ' ' o TAX NO. 65.00-02-53
C
~ n- D.B. 1069. PG. 809
~j 40' W AjER R N a ~
N'~W S ARC SEWS ~ 1~E o~
Sp,NI -~ ~ - ~ S 32'30'
E ASEMEN ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 38.1
PROPERTY OF N ~ oro cD o N .VARIABLE WIDTH
-~ N w ~ TEMPORARY CONSTF
CAROLYN C. JAY N ~ ~ EASEMENT -~
~, TAX NO. 64.02-01-57
`~ W.B. 44, PG. 911 ~ 7 64.54
SEE NOTES 3 & 4 ~ •°,~ ~ p~ PIN _~~ .~
' 82'53
_----------- i~ss' ~--S 213.
S 78 '23' 40° W ' •
324.55' ~ I~
~, cn ~ PROPOSE
PROPOSED MANHOLE #120 ~ ~ oo ~, o
)3'24" W ~ z ~` N rn~ f
.-- cD
;' TOTAL N 10'26'54 W °' HOME
66.87' ' ~, ° . ~ '~ Nrn
~ ~ ~, ~, TAX I
PROPERTY OF °- rn °',
s
CANAAN LAND COMPANY ~ ,~•
TAX N0. 64.02-01-21
D.B. 1326, F;. 900 ~ i
SEE N~Tr b ~ ~ -- - RnA"1~KE RIB
-~
,,~.
,~PPk~;~'P,"ATE ! IMITS `.
JF wATE~. .~ GEORc
30' PRESCRIPTIVE--~ ~~~ ' TAu
~i ~
ACQUISITION OF TWO PROPERTIES FROM CANAAN, LAND
BNGINSBRDYG coMPANY
N-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE TWO PARCELS OF
LAND FROM CANAAN LAND COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ROANOKE RIVER SEWER INTERCEPTOR PHASE III PROJECT
WHEREAS, a permanent sanitary sewer easement is required
across two parcels of land owned by Canaan Land Company in
connection with the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor Phase III
Project; and,
WHEREAS, the small size of the lots and the construction
requirements for the project will limit the use of said lots by the
owner, and damage the residue, to the extent that purchase of a fee
simple interest to said lots would be appropriate; and,
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated with the property owner for the
acquisition of said parcels, being Lots 1 and 2, lying between Poor
Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according to the Map Showing
Subdivision of Tract of land Lying North of and Adjacent to
"Nature's Own Bathing Pool" of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 3, page 8; and,
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcels
from Canaan Land Company for the sum of $2,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 19, 1991,
and the second reading was held on December 3, 1991.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
_~ .
1. That the acquisition and acceptance of Lots 1 and 2,
lying between Poor Mountain Road and the Roanoke River, according
to the above-reference map from Canaan Land Company, for a sum not
to exceed $2,000.00, is hereby authorized and approved; and
2. That the consideration of $2000.00 shall be paid from the
funds previously appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to the
Utility Department budget for the Roanoke River Sewer Interceptor
Phase III Project; and,
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to
accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved
by the County Attorney.
c:\wp5 ]\agenda\realert\rA~~~
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing Exchange of Real Estate
adjacent to Burlington Elementary School with
Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: !~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY'
This ordinance will implement an exchange of two small parcels
of real estate between the Roanoke County School Board and
Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation in conjunction with
their joint construction of a new street (Barrens Road extension)
providing improved bus access to Burlington Elementary School
When the Roanoke County School Board acquired the property for
Burlington School in 1938, the seller reserved a 60 foot right-of-
way easement along the western edge of that parcel. By an Agreement
dated July 11, 1991, the Roanoke County School Board entered into
a contract with Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp., the
successor in interest to the seller, to share some of the cost of
construction of a new street, 50 feet in width. This street, an
extension of Barrens Road across Peters Creek Road, will be
constructed in accordance with the standards of the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) and will be subsequently
conveyed to VDOT upon the expiration of the required waiting
period.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The construction of this new street will result in a small
parcel owned by the School Board, containing 0.031 acre (Parcel 1),
being cut off from the main school property on the west side of
this street, and a small parcel owned by Friendship Manor,
containing 0.217 acre (Parcel 2), being cut off from their property
on the east side of the street. In accordance with the Agreement of
July 11, 1991, prior to commencement of construction of the new
road, the parties intend to execute a deed to exchange these two
orphan parcels as well as to extinguish any remaining interest of
Friendship Manor in the original 60 foot right-of-way easement on
the Burlington School property. The Roanoke County School Board at
its November 21, 1991, meeting will adopt a resolution declaring
,~-~.
the parcel of 0.031 acres (Parcel 1) as surplus and conveying such
parcel to the County of Roanoke for reconveyance to Friendship
Manor. By said resolution, the Roanoke County School Board has
expressed its desire to receive title to the parcel of 0.217 acres
(Parcel 2) which adjoins Burlington School. This ordinance
authorizes the acceptance of title to Parcel 1 by the County and in
turn authorizes the County Administrator to execute such deeds and
other documents as shall be necessary to carry out this exchange of
real estate.
FISCAL IMPACTS'
None
ALTERNATIVES'
1. Authorize the exchange of two parcels of real estate to
facilitate extension of Barrens Road.
2. Decline to authorize such exchange of real estate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends favorable consideration of the ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~~ ~
J ep B. Obenshain
S nior Assistant County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers __
C:\W P51\AGENDA\REALEST~BURLINGI'ON
} ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING EBCHANGE OF REAL ESTATE
ADJACENT TO BIIRLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KITH
FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION
WHEREAS, by Agreement dated July 11, 1991, the County
School Board of Roanoke County and Friendship Manor Apartment
Village Corporation entered into a contract for the sharing of
costs for the construction of a new road over the property of both
parties adjacent to Burlington Elementary School and for the
exchange of parcels of real estate which would be left in isolation
by such construction; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on Thursday, November 21, 1991, the
County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, has adopted a
resolution declaring a parcel of 0.031 acre, which will remain upon
the western side of Barrens Road upon the completion of said 50
foot road, as surplus property and requesting the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to convey such property to Friendship
Manor Apartment Village Corporation as part of an exchange of real
estate pursuant to said agreement; and
WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has caused
a true copy of the aforesaid resolution to be filed with the Clerk
of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as
required by law so that the title to the aforesaid parcel of real
estate is now vested in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
conveyance of the hereinafter described real estate was held on
~f'~.
November 19, 1991; a second reading was held on December 3, 1991.
THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows:
1. That the conveyance of certain real estate identified as
"Parcel 1" on a plat designated "RESUBDIVISION FOR COUNTY SCHOOL
BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE
CORPORATION" dated February 15, 1991, prepared by Balzer and
Associates, Inc., having previously been declared surplus property
by the County School Board of Roanoke County, to the County of
Roanoke is hereby accepted and approved; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the aforesaid property is declared
surplus and is made available to exchange for real estate for other
public uses; and
3. That the conveyance of such Parcel 1 to Friendship Manor
Apartment Village Corporation in exchange for Parcel 2 identified
in the same plat, which Parcel 2 shall be conveyed to the County
School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, for school purposes is in
the public interest and is hereby accepted and approved.
4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as
are necessary to accomplish the conveyance and exchange of the
aforesaid properties, all of which shall be upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
c:\wp57 \agenda\realest\burlington.ord
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER ~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending County Code regulating the use
and operation of security and fire alarm systems.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~,~
~~
BACKGROUND:
The first reading of this ordinance was passed on October 8, 1991.
A request was made for some additional information and input from
the local alarm industry.
The Public Safety Agencies of Roanoke County respond to a large
number of mechanical/electrical alarms annually. A high number of
these alarms are false, resulting from human error, poor maintenance
or inferior product quality. Nearly every alarm requires an
emergency response exposing public safety employees and others on
the highway to a higher traffic safety risk. Additionally,
repeated false alarms tend to delay response to that location.
The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department has determined that it
already has authority to deal with false fire alarms under the
Roanoke County Fire Prevention Code and Commonwealth of Virginia
Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Therefore, this ordinance does not
address false fire alarms except by reference to the above two fire
prevention codes.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Public Safety Team reviewed the problems associated with alarms
1
,~'
for security, intrusion and fire. It was
alarms had a very high probability of being
police alarms received in a six month study
(see Addendum 1)
determined that police
false. Less than 1% of
period were emergencies.
Responses to alarms are typically made under emergency conditions
with multiple police units responding. Increased exposure to
liability arises when both employees and the public are exposed to
high speed public safety vehicles.
Currently, there is little private sector incentive to insure
employee alarm training/discipline, correct faulty installation,
provide quality maintenance or install high quality equipment
matched to site requirements. Alarms, both real and false,
terminating in the E-911 Center may tie up incoming emergency phone
lines to the point of grid lock.
A survey shows that ten localities in Virginia have ordinances that
address both the termination of alarms in E-911 Centers and the
response to repeated false alarms by public safety responders.
These ordinances typically control alarm termination in E-911
Centers and provide for a graduated penalty in the instance multiple
false alarms are received. Currently, one on-duty dispatcher's time
is essentially devoted to monitoring, receiving, dispatching and
resetting alarms.
After the first reading, and a public hearing on this ordinance,
October 8, 1991, additional contact was made with a representative
from the alarm installers in the Roanoke area. Further contact was
made with the Director of Maintenance at Tanglewood Mall. Input
from both sources was received and several minor changes were made.
They were:
- eliminating fees based on multiple unit responses
- allowing four false alarms in 12 months, instead of four
false alarms in six months
- setting a new fee schedule and requiring an inspection of
an alarm system upon the fourth false alarm in 12 months.
- changing the review panel membership by adding the
Building Commissioner and eliminating the County Attorney
- adding the definition of Alarm Company
- modifying County Fire Department reaction to false alarms
so that penalties could be assessed under the existing
County or State Fire Codes as opposed to this ordinance
- requiring that new alarm systems include a UPS component,
2
~- ~
(uninterrupted power supply) or battery back up consistent
with manufacturer's specifications.
Careful consideration was given in drafting the ordinance so that an
occasional false alarm would not result in a violation of law. It
was written in a spirit that encourages warning, enforcement and
ultimately compliance. Unusual situations may be reviewed by an
administrative review panel.
The contents of the proposed ordinance represents the unanimous
opinion of the Public Safety Team.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative #1:
To adopt the proposed ordinance. The proposed fee schedule is as
follows:
- First four false alarms in a twelve month period - no fee.
- Fifth false alarm in a twelve month period - $25.00 and
mandatory system inspection.
- Sixth false alarm in a twelve month period - $50.00.
- Seventh false alarm in a twelve month period - $100.00.
- Eighth false alarm and all subsequent false alarms in a
twelve month period - $150.00.
The additional revenue generated could be spent on capital needs at
the Communications Center.
The ordinance is designed to encourage compliance. A recent review
of records indicates that several thousands of dollars in potential
charges and fines may be available, although it is anticipated that
this amount would decrease dramatically in the first year based upon
other communities and their experience with similar legislation.
Alternative #2:
Do not adopt the ordinance.
Failure to regulate alarm system quality and termination of alarms
in the E-911 Center will result in continued higher liability
exposure to the public and employees and increased drains on limited
County resources. There will remain the negative impact of
responding to continuous false alarms which is detrimental to the
public safety mission.
3
I-~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the unanimous recommendation of the Public Safety Team that
the Board approve Alternative #1.
SUBMITTED BY:
Thomas C. Fuqua
Fire and Rescue Chief
Chairman, Public Safety Team
APPROVED:
~~~
Elmer C. odge, Jr.
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
4
Robers
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Eddy
No Yes Abs
Addendum 1
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
'~
Captain D. A. LaPrade
Ramona P. Kern
September 27, 1991
False Alarm Calls
Below is a table summary of false alarm calls for business and residential
alarms since May, 1990.
Date Range Alarm Type Alarms Handled Handled Verified ~`alse
Received by by Alarms Alarms
Roanoke Other
,County.
05-21-90 Daytime 150 142 8 7 135
to Business
12-31-90 Alarm
Nighttime 717 674 43 9 665
Business
Alarms
Residential 411 383 28 6 377
Alarms
CUMBINEb 1278 1199 79 22 1177
ALARMS
01-01-91 Daytime 147 140 7 10 130
to Business
09-15-91 Alarm
Nighttime 432 412 20 6 406
Business
Alarms
Residentail 512 481 31 5 476
Alarms
.COMBINED 1091 1033 58 21 '1b12
ALARMS
~~ ,. ~).
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE 111991-12 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY
CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND
SECURITY ALARMS" TO CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO
REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF SECURITY AND
FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
WHEREAS, the improper operation of fire and security
alarms by property owners, and the occasional unlawful activation
of such alarms, within the County of Roanoke threatens the safety
and health of the citizens of this county through unnecessary
responses by police and fire units as well as causing unnecessary
expense to the public and inconvenience to the neighbors of such
alarms; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance occurred on
October 8, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing occurred
on November 19, 1991.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a new Article VIII, "Fire and Security Alarms" of
Chapter 16, "POLICE" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and
enacted as follows:
ARTICLE VIII. FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS
Sec 16-20. Purpose
The purpose of this article is to regulate the use and
operation of security and fire alarm systems in premises to which
the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to
respond in order to reduce the number of false alarms and protect
1
a ,
the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county.
Sec 16-21. Definitions
For purposes of this article, the following words and phrases
shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section:
a. Alarm
Any device which, when actuated by the occurrence of a
criminal act or fire risk requiring police, fire or
rescue response, transmits a signal to a central alarm
system, a third party or directly to the Public Safety
Center or produces an audible or visible signal designed
to notify persons within audible or visual range of the
signal.
b. Alarm Board
The facility located in the communications section of the
Public Safety Center which is designed to receive direct
signals from Alarm Systems authorized to be connected
thereto.
c. Alarm Company
Any Person legally authorized to transact business within
the Commonwealth of Virginia and currently maintaining
either a Virginia contractor's license or a local
business license to engage in the business of
installation, maintenance, alteration, servicing or
monitoring alarm systems.
d. Automatic Dialinq Device
A device installed, operational and which is
2
1 ~
interconnected to a telephone line programmed to send a
recorded message, code or signal from a protected
premises to a telephone number assigned to the Public
Safety Center. This term shall include a "telephone
dialer" or a "tape dialer" or any other similar device
or equipment.
e. False Alarm
Any security or fire alarm signal, communicated directly
or indirectly to the Public Safety Center which is not
in response to actual or threatened criminal activity or
fire risk requiring immediate police, fire, or rescue
response. False Alarms include negligently or
accidentally activated signals; signals which are the
result of faulty, malfunctioning, or improperly installed
or maintained equipment; signals which are purposely
activated to summon the police department or fire and
rescue service in non-emergency situations; and signals
for which the actual cause is not determined. False
Alarms shall not include signals activated by unusually
severe weather conditions or other causes which are
identified and determined by the Chief of Police or
designee to be beyond the control of the User
f. Hiqh Hazard Premises
A facility requiring urgent attention to which the
police, fire or rescue department is expected to respond
for the protection of multiple persons as designated by
3
the Chief of Police or the Chief of Fire and Rescue
including but not limited to nursing homes, hospitals and
homes for the elderly. Such facilities shall include
those structures meeting the requirements for
institutional occupation under the Roanoke County
Building Code.
g. Person
Any individual, firm, partnership, association, company,
corporation, organization or other legal entity.
h. Protected Premises
The premises upon which a Security or Fire Alarm System
has been placed for the purpose of detecting a hazard.
i. Public Safety Center
The Roanoke County Public Safety Center including the E-
911 Center and the dispatch communications center or
their successors in title.
j. Security or Fire Alarm System/Alarm System
Any assembly of equipment or device designated to detect
and signal the unauthorized intrusion into a premises or
to signal an attempted burglary, robbery, other criminal
activity, or fire at the protected premises, to which the
police department or fire and rescue service are expected
to respond. Such term, however, shall not include
security alarm systems maintained by governmental
agencies.
k. User
4
Any Person using a Security or Fire Alarm System or
having an insurable interest in any premises upon which
is located such a system, regardless of whether the
Person owns the Security or Fire Alarm System or the
premises on which it is located.
Sec 16-22. False Alarms - Prohibited
a. It shall be unlawful for any Person to knowingly and
without just cause to activate a Security or Fire Alarm System to
summon the police department or fire and rescue service in
situations where there is no actual or threatened criminal or fire
risk requiring immediate police, fire or rescue response.
b. Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1
Misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to Two Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) or not more than twelve (12) months
in jail, or both.
Sec 16-23. Alarm - Deactivation
The police officer or fire and rescue official responding to
a False Alarm shall have the authority to deactivate said
Alarm System without liability when it is disturbing the peace and
quiet of the community, if the User fails to deactivate the Alarm
System within a reasonable time. A reasonable time for purposes of
this section shall be 30 minutes from the time that substantial
efforts are first made to contact the User.
Sec 16-24. New Alarm Connections
a. The County of Roanoke shall only maintain alarm
monitoring capability for those premises that are deemed to be a
5
High Hazard Premises. Such decision to issue permits for these
Alarm Systems shall require the approval of the Chief of Police and
Chief of Fire & Rescue of Roanoke County.
b. New Users may connect, maintain and operate Security or
Fire Alarm Systems that have their point of termination in the
Public Safety Center only upon satisfaction of the following
conditions:
1. Completion upon an annual basis of an application
form to be provided by the Chief of Police, or if
afire alarm, the Chief of Fire & Rescue, containing
the following information:
(a). name and address of the protected premises;
(b). name, address, telephone number or other
locations whereby the person(s) maintaining
the alarm can be located;
(c). name, address, telephone number or other means
of locating a minimum of two persons who can
be contacted on a 24 hour-a-day basis in case
of alarm or malfunction.
(d). any additional relevant information requested
by the Chief of Police or Chief of Fire &
Rescue of Roanoke County;
(e) . execution of a release of liability by the User
or by an officer or authorized agent of the
User.
Any material misstatement of fact made by any applicant
6
shall be sufficient cause for refusal to issue a permit
or to revoke any permit previously issued.
2. Installation by an Alarm Company or licensed
electrician maintaining a valid business license
within the Commonwealth of Virginia with the cost
to be paid by the User.
3. Monthly inspection and testing of the Alarm System
by the User and reporting, by the 10th day of the
next month, of the results of said inspections to
the Chief of Police or, if for a fire alarm, to
the Chief of Fire & Rescue, on forms to be provided
by said departments.
4. Implementation of a continuous training program for
appropriate employees and others, who may have
occasion to activate the Alarm System, regarding
the use and operation of such Alarm System, which
includes instruction on the setting, activation and
resetting of the Alarm.
c. Roanoke County assumes no liability for any omission or
commission resulting from the Security or Fire Alarm System
terminating in the Alarm Boards in the Public Safety Center.
d. No alarm permit issued under this Article can be
transferred to another person. A permit holder shall inform the
Chief of Police of any change that materially alters any
information listed on the permit application within five business
days of such occurrence.
7
Sec 16-25. Deactivation of Existing Alarms - Prohibited Alarms
a. Any User which has its Alarm System connected to the
Public Safety Center on the effective date of this ordinance shall,
30 days after receipt of written communication from the Chief of
Police, disconnect any alarm terminating therein. Failure to
disconnect will result in said alarm being disconnected by the
County without liability, at the owners expense.
b. After the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be
unlawful for any person to install, operate or maintain an
Automatic Dialing Device or service which is programmed to transmit
a prerecorded message or code signal directly from a residence,
premises or dwelling to any telephone number assigned to the Public
Safety Center, Police, or Fire and Rescue Departments, or to
install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or other
Security or Fire Alarm System in violation of the provision of this
ordinance.
c. Alarms may be connected to an Alarm Board located in the
Public Safety Center only with the express written approval of the
Chief of Police and the Chief of Fire & Rescue of Roanoke County.
d. Nothing contained herein will prohibit any Person or User
from installing an Alarm System which terminates with a commercial
or other alarm monitoring and answering service.
e. A User of a local Alarm shall adjust the mechanism of any
Alarm or cause such mechanism to be adjusted so that an alarm
signal shall not sound for longer than 30 minutes after being
activated.
8
f. After the effective date of this ordinance, no Alarm
System shall be installed in any premises within this county which
does not have an independent source of power capable of providing
an uninterrupted power supply to such alarm in conformity with thee
manufactures specifications for that installation. In the absence
of any such manufactures specification, the Alarm System shall
provide a minimum of eight hours of independent power supply.
Sec 16-26. False Alarm Fees
a. Users shall be allowed four false alarms, without fees,
in any calendar year. For each false alarm beyond the four
permitted by this section, there will be fees levied against the
User, except as follows:
1. No fee shall be charged for a false alarm if, prior to
dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department to
the scene of the alarm, the Public Safety Center is notified
by the User or an authorized employee or agent of said User.
2. No fee shall be charged for a False Alarm when the User
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police, or
designee, that said false alarm was generated by adverse
weather conditions, or electrical or telephonic power failures
or other causes which are identified and determined by the
Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the
User.
(i) All fire False Alarms shall come under the
jurisdiction of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in
accordance with the Fire Prevention Code of the County
9
of Roanoke as set forth in Article II of Chapter 9 of the
Roanoke County Code.
b. If within any calendar year, there is a dispatch of
vehicles or personnel of the police department in response to more
than four false alarms per premises, fees shall be assessed against
the User for all subsequent dispatches in accordance with the
following schedule:
1. Fifth Dispatch $ 25.00
2. Sixth Dispatch $ 50.00
3. Seventh Dispatch $100.00
4. Eighth and all subsequent Dispatches $150.00
The fees assessed by this section are intended to reflect the
actual costs or a portion thereof incurred by the County in
providing alarm responses and in administering this Chapter and
such fees shall be re-evaluated on an as-needed basis,
c. Telephonic requests received for police, fire or
rescue response to a protected premises or dwelling, from a third
party alarm monitoring service that meet the criteria for "False
Alarms" as defined by ordinance shall be subject to the false alarm
fee schedule contained herein. The User shall be legally
responsible for all fees or charges imposed thereunder.
d. Any User experiencing a fourth False Alarm as defined in
subsection a. above shall have their Alarm System inspected by an
Alarm Company. This inspection shall include a complete examination
of the Alarm System including, but not limited to, satisfactory
design and installation of the alarm equipment, proper functioning
10
of the Alarm and education of the User in the proper operation of
the Alarm System. The Alarm Company shall record the details of
this inspection on a form provided by the Police Department for
this purpose. The completed inspection report shall be returned to
the Police Department by the Alarm Company within seven days of the
inspection. A copy of the completed inspection report shall be
provided to the User by the Alarm Company at the same time.
e. The Police Department shall notify a User of the
requirements of subsection d by registered mail within 30 days of
the fourth false alarm. If the inspection required by subsection
d is not completed within 30 days of this notification, the User
shall be liable to the County for an administrative service fee of
One Hundred Dollars ($100.00).
f. The Roanoke County Police Department will be responsible
for maintaining records of false alarms for billing purposes and
shall forward such information to the Roanoke County Treasurer's
Office on a monthly basis.
g. In the event that a User fails to pay a false alarm fee
or administrative service fee, or both, levied under this Section
within 30 days of the billing date used by the County Treasurer,
the User shall be charged interest at the judgment rate from such
billing date All such fees and charges shall be paid to the
Roanoke County Treasurer. An appeal, as provided for below, shall
suspend the running of such interest, but interest shall be due to
Roanoke County as calculated from the date the fees or charges were
originally billed in the event that such appeal is denied.
11
h. Any fees or charges, or both, collected under this
Section shall be deposited in a capital improvement account for the
benefit of the Roanoke County Public Safety Communications Center.
Sec. 16-27. Administrative appeal procedure
a. Disputes over the number of False Alarms or assessment
of fees may be reviewed by a panel consisting of the Chief of
Police or designee, an Assistant County Administrator and the
Building Commissioner upon receipt of a written request from the
petitioner within five business days of receiving the bill.
Decisions of this appeal panel shall be consistent with the
purposes and intent of this ordinance. A consensus of the panel
shall constitute the final decision which shall be communicated to
the petitioner and Roanoke County Treasurer in writing. A member
of the fire and signal alarm industry shall be an ex-officio
member.
b. The administrative appeal panel shall consider the
following factors in reaching a determination as to the
appropriateness of a false alarm fee or administrative service fee:
1. Evidence of attempts by the User to eliminate the
cause of False Alarms, including (i) installation of new
equipment, (ii) replacement of defective equipment, (iii)
inspection and repair of the system by an Alarm Company, and
(iv) specific formal training of User.
2. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by
electrical storm, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, or other act
of God.
12
3. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by the
disruption of telephone circuits beyond the control of the
User or any Alarm Company or central monitoring agency and
that the cause of such disruption has been corrected.
4. Written evidence that the Alarm System which caused
the alarm responses has been disconnected and removed from the
premises.
Sec. 16-28. Authority of Department of Fire and Rescue
This Article shall not be interpreted to limit the authority
of the Department of Fire and Rescue and the Fire Marshal of
Roanoke County to enforce any provision of the Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code as incorporated in Article II of Chapter 9,
"Fire Prevention and Protection", of the Roanoke County Code
regarding Alarms Systems or False Alarms.
2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after January
1, 1992.
On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve as
amended with fees remaining the same, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~ `
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Circuit Court
13
C. O. Clemens, Chief Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Chief Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
John H. Cease, Police Chief
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
14
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - ~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
-PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE _CTTIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT:
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIIE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
;;~
NAME ~ ~ ~~ ~-{~, w ~ 5~ ~'f , ~~' ~ ~ ~~ ; ~ Ste; ~ ~ s ;1 ~~~,~
ADDRESS " ~ ~ ' 1
__
PHONE ..~ ~ 3 - ~ / ~ ~"
I11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
iii~i~i~iii~i~~iiiii~ii~ii~iii~~~~i~tii~~i~i~~itiii~~iiiii~iii~ii~~i~ti~~itiii
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ T ~ ~~
APPE CE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~/~~ ~_ `' r'= _ ;~~' f~~'~,` ~ ~, ~ k~ i_) ~;,~.~ ,~ ~ v ~ ,t`
Ci '
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR 1~ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
,^
NAME
,
ADDRESS ~, - ,.
PHONE = = ~- ~ ,~ '
'- w
""1 I""""' I' 1 t""""' I"' ~""""""' f""'t"""""""""""' 1 t
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' -1- ~~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ w,e~~y ~~~ s
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIC
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
WA yy E ~~.vy~
~. ~~1--~7T- ~7zT~ t
~0 4- ;'~~- X300
11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
iii~iii~iii~~~t~ii~~~ii~i~~i~~~~i~~i~i~iiiii~i~~~ii~iiitiiiii~~~~i~i~~t~~~ii~~~
AGENDA ITEM NO. -~- - ~--~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: _ ~ Div Un U ~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~. ~'~'/~/~~ ~ h~ ~ ~-z ~. ,,;.~
ADDRESS _ ~ :.3i ~ S ~--~ ~=~~L c~ v,~=
PHONE -~ ~ _~ ~ .~ 5~- ~ ~ 5 ~~
~~11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
t ~ - _% ..
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND
SECURITY ALARMS" TO CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO
REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF SECURITY AND
FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
WHEREAS, the improper operation of fire and security
alarms by property owners, and the occasional unlawful activation
of such alarms, within the County of Roanoke threatens the safety
and health of the citizens of this county through unnecessary
responses by police and fire units as well as causing unnecessary
expense to the public and inconvenience to the neighbors of such
alarms; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance occurred on
October 8, 1991; and the second reading and public hearing occurred
on November 19, 1991.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a new Article VIII, "Fire and Security Alarms" of
Chapter 16, "POLICE" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and
enacted as follows:
ARTICLE VIII. FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS
Sec 16-20. Purpose
The purpose of this article is to regulate the use and
operation of security and fire alarm systems in premises to which
the police department or fire and rescue service are expected to
respond in order to reduce the number of false alarms and protect
1
~~
the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county.
Sec 16-21. Definitions
For purposes of this article, the following words and phrases
shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section:
a. Alarm
Any device which, when actuated by the occurrence of a
criminal act or fire risk requiring police, fire or
rescue response, transmits a signal to a central alarm
system, a third party or directly to the Public Safety
Center or produces an audible or visible signal designed
to notify persons within audible or visual range of the
signal.
b. Alarm Board
The facility located in the communications section of the
Public Safety Center which is designed to receive direct
signals from Alarm Systems authorized to be connected
thereto.
c. Alarm Company
Any Person legally authorized to transact business within
the Commonwealth of Virginia and currently maintaining
either a Virginia contractor's license or a local
business license to engage in the business of
installation, maintenance, alteration, servicing or
monitoring alarm systems.
d. Automatic Dialing Device
A device installed, operational and which is
2
'"
interconnected to a telephone line programmed to send a
recorded message, code or signal from a protected
premises to a telephone number assigned to the Public
Safety Center. This term shall include a "telephone
dialer" or a "tape dialer" or any other similar device or
equipment.
e. False Alarm
Any security or fire alarm signal, communicated directly
or indirectly to the Public Safety Center which is not in
response to actual or threatened criminal activity or
fire risk requiring immediate police, fire, or rescue
response. False Alarms include negligently or
accidentally activated signals; signals which are the
result of faulty, malfunctioning, or improperly installed
or maintained equipment; signals which are purposely
activated to summon the police department or fire and
rescue service in non-emergency situations; and signals
for which the actual cause is not determined. False
Alarms shall not include signals activated by unusually
severe weather conditions or other causes which are
identified and determined by the Chief of Police or
designee to be beyond the control of the User
f. Hiqh Hasard Premises
A facility requiring urgent attention to which the
police, fire or rescue department is expected to respond
for the protection of multiple persons as designated by
3
the Chief of Police or the Chief of Fire and Rescue
including but not limited to nursing homes, hospitals and
homes for the elderly. Such facilities shall include
those structures meeting the requirements for
institutional occupation under the Roanoke County
Building Code.
g. Person
Any individual, firm, partnership, association, company,
corporation, organization or other legal entity.
h. Protected Premises
The premises upon which a Security or Fire Alarm System
has been placed for the purpose of detecting a hazard.
i. Public Safety Center
The Roanoke County Public Safety Center including the E-
911 Center and the dispatch communications center or
their successors in title.
j. Security or Fire Alarm System/Alarm System
Any assembly of equipment or device designated to detect
and signal the unauthorized intrusion into a premises or
to signal an attempted burglary, robbery, other criminal
activity, or fire at the protected premises, to which the
police department or fire and rescue service are expected
to respond. Such term, however, shall not include
security alarm systems maintained by governmental
agencies.
k. Oser
4
Any Person using a Security or Fire Alarm System or
having an insurable interest in any premises upon which
is located such a system, regardless of whether the
Person owns the Security or Fire Alarm System or the
premises on which it is located.
Sec 16-22. False Alarms - Prohibited
a. It shall be unlawful for any Person to knowingly and
without just cause to activate a Security or Fire Alarm System to
summon the police department or fire and rescue service in
situations where there is no actual or threatened criminal or fire
risk requiring immediate police, fire or rescue response.
b. Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1
Misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to Two Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) or not more than twelve (12) months in
jail, or both.
Sec 16-23. Alarm - Deactivation
The police officer or fire and rescue official responding to
a False Alarm shall have the authority to deactivate said
Alarm System without liability when it is disturbing the peace and
quiet of the community, if the User fails to deactivate the Alarm
System within a reasonable time. A reasonable time for purposes of
this section shall be 30 minutes from the time that substantial
efforts are first made to contact the User.
Sec 16-24. New Alarm Connections
a. The County of Roanoke shall only maintain alarm
monitoring capability for those premises that are deemed to be a
5
.~ a
shall be sufficient cause for refusal to issue a permit
or to revoke any permit previously issued.
2. Installation by an Alarm Company or licensed
electrician maintaining a valid business license
within the Commonwealth of Virginia with the cost
to be paid by the User.
3. Monthly inspection and testing of the Alarm System
by the User and reporting, by the 10th day of the
next month, of the results of said inspections to
the Chief of Police , or, if for a fire alarm, to
the Fire Chief, on forms to be provided by said
departments.
4. Implementation of a continuous training program for
appropriate employees and others, who may have
occasion to activate the Alarm System, regarding
the use and operation of such Alarm System, which
includes instruction on the setting, activation and
resetting of the Alarm.
c. Roanoke County assumes no liability for any omission or
commission resulting from the Security or Fire Alarm System
terminating in the Alarm Boards in the Public Safety Center.
d. No alarm permit issued under this Article can be
transferred to another person. A permit holder shall inform the
Chief of Police of any change that materially alters any
information listed on the permit application within five business
days of such occurrence.
7
High Hazard Premises. Such decision to issue permits for these
Alarm Systems shall require the approval of the Chief of Police and
Fire Chief of Roanoke County.
b. New Users may connect, maintain and operate Security or
Fire Alarm Systems that have their point of termination in the
Public Safety Center only upon satisfaction of the following
conditions:
1. Completion upon an annual basis of an application
form to be provided by the Chief of Police, or if a
fire alarm, the Fire Chief, containing the
following information:
(a). name and address of the protected premises;
(b). name, address, telephone number or other
locations whereby the person(s) maintaining
the alarm can be located;
(c). name, address, telephone number or other means
of locating a minimum of two persons who can
be contacted on a 24 hour-a-day basis in case
of alarm or malfunction.
(d). any additional relevant information requested
by the Chief of Police or Fire Chief of
Roanoke County;
(e). execution of a release of liability by the
User or by an officer or authorized agent of
the User.
Any material misstatement of fact made by any applicant
6
.~= ~
Sec 16-25. Deactivation of Existing Alarms - Prohibited Alarms
a. Any User which has its Alarm System connected to the
Public Safety Center on the effective date of this ordinance shall,
30 days after receipt of written communication from the Chief of
Police, disconnect any alarm terminating therein. Failure to
disconnect will result in said alarm being disconnected by the
County without liability, at the owners expense.
b. After the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be
unlawful for any person to install, operate or maintain an
Automatic Dialing Device or service which is programmed to transmit
a prerecorded message or code signal directly from a residence,
premises or dwelling to any telephone number assigned to the Public
Safety Center, Police, or Fire and Rescue Departments, or to
install, operate or maintain an Automatic Dialing Device or other
Security or Fire Alarm System in violation of the provision of this
ordinance.
c. Alarms may be connected to an Alarm Board located in the
Public Safety Center only with the express written approval of the
Chief of Police and the Fire Chief of Roanoke County.
d. Nothing contained herein will prohibit any Person or User
from installing an Alarm System which terminates with a commercial
or other alarm monitoring and answering service.
e. A User of a local Alarm shall adjust the mechanism of any
Alarm or cause such mechanism to be adjusted so that an alarm
signal shall not sound for longer than 30 minutes after being
activated.
8
f. After the effective date of this ordinance, no Alarm
System shall be installed in any premises within this county which
does not have an independent source of power capable of providing
an uninterrupted power supply to such alarm in conformity with thee
manufactures specifications for that installation. In the absence
of any such manufactures specification, the Alarm System shall
provide a minimum of eight hours of independent power supply.
Sec 16-26. False Alarm Fees
a. Users shall be allowed four false alarms, without fees,
in any calendar year. For each false alarm beyond the four
permitted by this section, there will be fees levied against the
User, except as follows:
1. No fee shall be charged for a false alarm if, prior to
dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department to
the scene of the alarm, the Public Safety Center is notified
by the User or an authorized employee or agent of said User.
2. No fee shall be charged for a False Alarm when the User
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police, or
designee, that said false alarm was generated by adverse
weather conditions, or electrical or telephonic power failures
or other causes which are identified and determined by the
Chief of Police or designee to be beyond the control of the
User.
(i) All fire False Alarms shall come under the
jurisdiction of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in
accordance with the Fire Prevention Code of the County of
9
"~
Roanoke as set forth in Article II of Chapter 9 of the
Roanoke County Code.
b. If within any 12 month calendar period, there is a
dispatch of vehicles or personnel of the police department in
response to more than four false alarms, fees shall be assessed
against the User for all subsequent dispatches in accordance with
the following schedule:
1. Fifth Dispatch $ 25.00
2. Sixth Dispatch $ 50.00
3. Seventh Dispatch $100.00
4. Eighth and all subsequent Dispatches $150.00
The fees assessed by this section are intended to reflect the
actual costs incurred by the County in providing alarm responses
and in administering this Chapter and such fees shall be re-
evaluated on an as-needed basis,
c. Telephonic requests received for police, fire or
rescue response to a protected premises or dwelling, from a third
party alarm monitoring service that meet the criteria for "False
Alarms" as defined by ordinance shall be subject to the false alarm
fee schedule contained herein. The User shall be legally
responsible for all fees or charges imposed thereunder.
d. Any User experiencing a fourth False Alarm as defined in
subsection a. above shall have their Alarm System inspected by an
Alarm Company. This inspection shall include a complete examination
of the Alarm System including, but not limited to, satisfactory
design and installation of the alarm equipment, proper functioning
10
,."
of the Alarm and education of the User in the proper operation of
the Alarm System. The Alarm Company shall record the details of
this inspection on a form provided by the Police Department for
this purpose. The completed inspection report shall be returned to
the Police Department by the Alarm Company within seven days of the
inspection. A copy of the completed inspection report shall be
provided to the User by the Alarm Company at the same time.
e. The Police Department shall notify a User of the
requirements of subsection d by registered mail within 30 days of
the fourth false alarm. If the inspection required by subsection d
is not completed within 30 days of this notification, the User
shall be liable to the County for an administrative service fee of
One Hundred Dollars ($100.00).
f. The Roanoke County Police Department will be responsible
for maintaining records of false alarms for billing purposes and
shall forward such information to the Roanoke County Treasurer's
Office on a monthly basis.
g. In the event that a User fails to pay a false alarm fee
or administrative service fee or both, levied under this Section
within 30 days of the billing date used by the County Treasurer,
the User shall be charged interest at the judgment rate from such
billing date All such fees and charges shall be paid to the
Roanoke County Treasurer. An appeal, as provided for below, shall
suspend the running of such interest, but interest shall be due to
Roanoke County as calculated from the date the fees or charges were
originally billed in the event that such appeal is denied.
11
h. Any fees or charges, or both, collected under this
Section shall be deposited in a capital improvement account for the
benefit of the Roanoke County Public Safety Communications Center.
Sec. 16-27. Administrative appeal procedure
a.. Disputes over the number of False Alarms or assessment of
fees may be reviewed by a panel consisting of the Chief of Police
or designee, an Assistant County Administrator and the Building
Commissioner upon receipt of a written request from the petitioner
within five business days of receiving the bill. Decisions of this
appeal panel shall be consistent with the purposes and intent of
this ordinance. A consensus of the panel shall constitute the final
decision which shall be communicated to the petitioner and Roanoke
County Treasurer in writing.
b. The administrative appeal panel shall consider the
following factors in reaching a determination as to the
appropriateness of a false alarm fee or administrative service fee:
1. Evidence of attempts by the User to eliminate the
cause of False Alarms, including (i) installation of new
equipment, (ii) replacement of defective equipment, (iii)
inspection and repair of the system by an Alarm Company, and
(iv) specific formal training of User.
2. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by
electrical storm, hurricane, tornado, blizzard, or other act
of God.
3. Evidence that any False Alarm was caused by the
disruption of telephone circuits beyond the control of the
12
~'' ~
User or any Alarm Company or central monitoring agency and
that the cause of such disruption has been corrected.
4. Written evidence that the Alarm System which caused
the alarm responses has been disconnected and removed from the
premises.
Sec. 16-28. Authority of Department of Fire and Rescue
This Article shall not be interpreted to limit the authority
of the Department of Fire and Rescue and the Fire Marshal of
Roanoke County to enforce any provision of the Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code as incorporated in Article II of Chapter 9,
"Fire Prevention and Protection", of the Roanoke County Code
regarding Alarms Systems or False Alarms.
2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after January 1,
1992.
c:\wp5 ] \agenda\code\firealrm.ord
13
r
g--
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE 111991-13 AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE
IV, SEWER USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE
ROANORE COUNTY CODE OF 1985 (formerly, Article III,
of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971).
WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement entered into by
and between, and still binding upon, Roanoke City and the County of
Roanoke requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations as
necessary to conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they
pertain to Sewer Use Standards; and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance # 62486-146, § 1, adopted on June 24,
1986, Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 was amended to add
an Article III relative to sewer use standards and by Ordinance # 91289-
14, adopted on September 12, 1989, said Article was further amended; and
WHEREAS, recent regulatory requirements enacted by the State
Water Control Board and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency have
necessitated changes by the City of Roanoke to its Sewer Use Standards;
and
WHEREAS, the operative requirements of the current Sewage
Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke
requires amendment of the County's ordinances to bring them into
conformity with the current Roanoke City Sewer Use Standards; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July
9, 1991, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 23,
1991, and continued to November 19, 1991.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1
1. That the amended "SEWER USE STANDARDS" be reenacted as
"ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS" of CHAPTER 18 of the Roanoke County
Code of 1985.
CHAPTER 18
ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS
Sec. 18-151 Definitions.
For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases set out in
this section shall have the following meanings:
Act means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., as amended.
Approving Authority for purposes of this Article only shall mean the
county administrator or his duly authorized representative and shall be
ectuivalent to control authority.
BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) means the quantity of oxygen by weight,
expressed in mg/1, utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic
matter under standard laboratory conditions for five (5) days at a
temperature of twenty (20) degrees centigrade.
Building sewer means the extension from the building drain to the
public sewer or other place of disposal (also called house lateral and
house connection).
Categorical Standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards
or Pretreatment Standard.
Capital costs means a sum sufficient recovered by user charges computed
by using the capital recover factor for the average life of all capital
items including capitalized O & M charges (unless collected separately)
2
on which expenditures have been made or will have to be made for
wastewater treatment facilities, processes or transmission lines.
Capital costs may be adjusted from time to time to reflect cost
experience.
Categorical standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatment
Standard.
Class I user means any person discharging normal domestic wastewater
into a sanitary sewer and any industrial user discharging Group B
wastewater into the sanitary sewer.
Class II user means any person discharging Group A wastewater into a
sanitary sewer.
COD (chemical oxygen demand) means the measure, expressed in mg/1, of the
oxygen consuming capacity of inorganic and organic matter present in
water or wastewater, expressing the amount of oxygen consumed from a
chemical oxidant in a specific test, but not differentiating between
stable and unstable organic matter and thus not necessarily correlating
with biochemical oxygen demand.
COD-BOD ratio means the ratio of the value of COD to BOD as these
values are defined above.
COD (soluble) means the COD of the filtrate from wastewater that is
filtered through a gooch crucible as required by the suspended solids
test in "Standard Methods."
Control manhole means a manhole giving access to a building sewer at
some point before the building sewer discharge mixes with other
3
discharges in the public sewer.
Control point means a point of access to a course of discharge before
the discharge mixes with other discharges in the public sewer.
County means Roanoke County .
Discharge means any introduction of substances into the sanitary
sewer.
Garbage means animal and vegetable wastes and residue from the
preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the handling,
processing, storage and sale of food products and produce.
Group A wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers
in which any one of the parameters below are more than the given
loading:
Average Daily
Parameter Monthly Composite
Total suspended solids (TSS) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day
Total phosphorus (TP) 3.75 lbs./day 4.5 lbs./day
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) 4.50 lbs./day 5.4 lbs./day
Group B wastewater means the discharge of permitted industrial
wastewater not otherwise qualifying as Group A wastewater.
Incompatible waste means a waste which is not susceptible to adequate
treatment by the wastewater treatment plant.
Industrial user means any user of publicly owned treatment works
identified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987,
4
Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under
divisions A, B,D, E, and I, including governmental facilities that
discharge wastewater to the plant.
Industrial waste means waste resulting from any process of industry,
manufacturing, trade or business from the development of any natural
resource, or any mixture of the waste with water or normal wastewater,
or distinct from normal wastewater.
Infiltration means water entering a sewer system, including service
connections from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to,
defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls.
Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from inflow.
Inflow means water discharged into a sewer system, including service
connections, from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders,
cellar yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water
discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross
connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm
waters, surface runoff, street wash waters, or drainage. It does not
include, and is distinguished from infiltration.
Interference means a discharge which, along or in conjunction with a
discharge or discharges from other sources, (1) inhibits or disrupts the
plant, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes,
use or disposal; or (2) causes a violation of the plant's VPDES permit.
Milligrams per liter (mg/1) means the same as parts per million and is a
weight-to-volume ratio; the milligram-per liter value multiplied by the
factor 8.34 shall be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water.
5
National categorical pretreatment standard or pretreatment standard means any
regulations containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the EPA
in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 1317)
and 40 C.F.R. Subchapter N (Parts 401-471) as amended, which applies to
a specific category of industrial users.
Natural outlet means any outlet into a watercourse, ditch, lake or other
body of surface water or ground water.
Normal wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers
in which the average concentration of total suspended solids and BOD is
not more than 250 mg/1, total phosphorus is not more than 15 mg/1, total
Kjeldahl nitrogen is not more than 18 mg/1 and total flow is not more
than 25,000 gallons per day.
Overload means the imposition of organic or hydraulic loading on a
treatment facility in excess of its engineered design capacity.
Pass through means a discharge which exits the plant into water of the
United States in quantities which may cause a violation of the plant's
VPDES permit.
Person includes individual, corporation, organization, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust,
partnership association and any other legal entity.
pH means the logarithm (base 10) of the reciprocal of the hydrogen
ion concentration expressed in grams per liter.
Phosphorus (total) means the sum of the various types of phosphate
expressed as elemental phosphorus. found in wastewater. The various
6
forms include ortho phosphate, condensed phosphates (pyro, meta, and
poly-phosphates), and organically bound phosphates. The concentration
of total phosphate is determined by the "Standard Methods" test
procedure.
Plant means the City of Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant, e~
Public sewer means pipe or conduit carrying wastewater or unpolluted
drainage in which owners of abutting properties shall have the use,
subject to control by the County.
Sanitary sewer means a public sewer that conveys domestic wastewater or
industrial wastes or a combination of both, and into which storm water,
surface water, groundwater and other unpolluted wastes are not
intentionally passed.
Slug means any discharge of water, wastewater or industrial waste
which, in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow,
exceeds, for any period longer than fifteen (15) minutes, more than five
(5) times the average twenty-four (24) hour concentration or flows
during normal operation.
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) means classification pursuant to the
Standard Industrial Classification Manual issued by the Executive Office
of *_-~re~es~e~~~Pf-~e~e a Management and
Budget, 1987, as amended.
Standard Methods means the examination and analytical procedures set
forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of "Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as prepared,
7
ti
approved and published jointly by the American Public Health
Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water
Pollution Control Federation.
Storm sewer means a public sewer which carries storm and surface water
and drainage and into which domestic wastewater or industrial wastes are
not intentionally passed.
Storm water means rainfall or any other forms of precipitation.
Suspended solids means solids measured in mg/1 that either float on the
surface of, or are in suspension in, water, wastewater or other liquids,
and which are largely removable by a laboratory filtration device.
To discharge includes to deposit, conduct, drain, emit, throw, run,
allow to seep or otherwise release or dispose of, or to allow, permit
or suffer any of these acts or omissions.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen means the combined ammonia and organic nitrogen in
a given wastewater, as measured by the "Standard Methods" test
procedure. It does not include nitrite and nitrate nitrogen.
Trap means a device designed to skim, settle or otherwise remove
grease, oil, sand, flammable wastes or other harmful substances.
Unpolluted wastewater means water containing:
(1) No fee or emulsified grease or oil.
(2) No acids or alkalis.
(3) No phenols or other substances producing taste or odor in
receiving water.
(4) No toxic or poisonous substances in suspension, colloidal
state or solution.
8
(5) No noxious or otherwise obnoxious or odorous gases.
(6) Not more than ten (10) mg/1 each of suspended solids and BOD.
(7) Color not exceeding fifty (50) units, as measured by the
Platinum-Cobalt method of determination, as specified in
"Standard Methods."
User charge means the charge made to those persons who discharge
normal wastewater into the County's sewage system. This charge shall
include a proportionate share of any capital improvements to the system
(capital costs).
User surcharge means the charge made, in excess of the user charge, for
all wastewater over and above the loading defined as normal wastewater.
Waste means rejected, unutilized or superfluous substances, in
liquid, gaseous or solid form, resulting from domestic, agricultural or
industrial activities.
Wastewater means a combination of the water-carried waste from
residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial
establishments, together with any ground, surface and storm water that
may be present.
Wastewater facilities includes all facilities for collection, pumping,
treating and disposing of wastewater and industrial wastes.
Wastewater service charge means the charge. on all users of the public sewer
whose wastes are treated at the plant and is the appropriate sum of the
user charge and user surcharge.
Wastewater treatment plant means any municipal-owned facilities, devices
and structures used for receiving, processing and treating wastewater,
9
industrial waste and sludges from the sanitary sewers.
Wastecourse means a natural or man-made channel in which a flow of
water occurs, either continuously or intermittently.
Sec. 18-152. General Requirements.
(a) All discharges into public sewers shall conform to
requirements of this article; however, the federal categorical
pretreatment standards or any standards imposed by the state water
control board or its successor in authority are hereby incorporated by
reference where applicable and where such standards are more stringent
than those set forth in this article.
J
No
significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approving
authority shall discharge industrial wastewaters into the sanitarv sewer
system without an appropriate industrial waste discharge permit as
provided in this article.
(c) Unless exception is granted by the approving authority or by
other provisions of this chapter, the public sewer system shall be used
by all persons discharging wastewater, industrial waste, polluted
liquids or unpolluted waters or liquids.
(d) Unless authorized by the State Water Control Board or its
successor in authority, no person shall deposit or discharge any waste
included in subsection (c) of this section on public or private property
in or adjacent to any natural outlet, watercourse, storm sewer or other
area within the jurisdiction of the County.
(e) The approving authority shall determine, prior to discharge,
10
that wastes to be discharged will receive such treatment as is required
by the laws, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders of federal, state
and local authorities, or such discharge shall not be permitted.
(f) Each industrial user discharging industrial waste waters into
the sanitary sewer system shall provide protection from accidental
discharge of prohibited materials or other substances regulated by this
Article. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited
materials shall be provided and maintained at the owner or user's own
cost and expense. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating
procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the
approving authority before construction of the facility. All such
existing users shall complete such a plan by July 1, 1986. No such user
who commences operation after the effective date of this section shall
be permitted to introduce pollutants into the system until accidental
discharge procedures have been so approved. Review and approval of such
plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the industrial user
from the responsibility to modify the user's facility as necessary to
meet the requirements of this Article. In the case of an accidental
discharge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone
and notify the approving authority of the incident. The notification
shall include location of discharge, type of waste, concentration and
volume and corrective actions.
Within five (5) days following an accidental discharge; the user
shall submit to the approving authority a detailed written report
describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by
the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall
11
t
not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability
which may be incurred as a result of damage to the sewer system or
treatment plant, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property;
nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil
penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by this article or
other applicable law.
A notice shall be permanently posted on the user's bulletin board
or other prominent place advising employees whom to call in the event
of a dangerous discharge. Employers shall insure that all employees who
may cause or suffer such a dangerous discharge to occur are advised of
the emergency notification procedure.
(g) In the event of an emergency, as determined by the approving
authority, the approving authority shall be authorized to immediately
halt any actual or threatened discharge.
(h) A person discharging in violation of the provisions of this
article, within thirty (30) days of the date of such discharge, shall
sample, analyze and submit the data to the approving authority unless
the approving authority elects to perform such sampling.
Sec. 18-153. Prohibited Discharges Generally.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any waste which,
by itself or by interaction with other wastes, may:
(1) Injure or interfere with wastewater treatment processes
or facilities;
(2) Constitute a hazard to humans or animals; or
(3) Create a hazard in receiving waters of the wastewater
treatment plant effluent.
12
j4Z Generate heat in amounts which will inhibit biological
activity in the plant resulting in interference, and in
no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at
the plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Celsius (one hundred
four (104) degrees Fahrenheit) unless the approving
authority approves alternate temperature limits.
(b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain:
(1) Antifreeze.
(2) Fluoride other than that contained in the public water
supply greater than 10.0 mg/1.
(3 ) Eh-~e~-ie~Ps i-~-ee~~~~z-ears g~e~
Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX) greater
than 5.0 mg/1.
(4 ) ~s~9~li~"c~~-ircEl~ , , e~eiT-9iQ-6-t-~i.., c ~ .. ..',. ~ ..
' , Flammable or
explosive liquid, solid or gas in hazardous amounts.
(5) Substances causing a chemical oxygen demand (COD) greater
than 1,500 mg/1 in the wastewater.
(6) Strong acid or concentrated plating solutions, whether
neutralized or not.
(7) Fats, wax, grease or oils, whether emulsified or not, in
excess of 100 mg/1 or containing substances which may
solidify or become viscous at temperatures between
thirty-two (32°) degrees and one hundred fifty (150)
degrees Fahrenheit (0° and 65° Centigrade).
13
(8) Obnoxious, toxic or poisonous solids, liquids, or gases
in quantities sufficient to violate the provisions of
subsection (a) of this section.
(9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a Ph
lower than 5.5 or higher than 9.5, or any other substance
with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or
hazard to structures, equipment or personnel at the
wastewater facility.
(10) Substances which cause a COD to BOD ratio greater than
5.
(11) Waste, wastewater or any other substance containing
phenols, hydrogen sulfide or other taste-and-odor
producing substances that have not been minimized. After
treatment of the composite wastewater, effluent
concentration limits may not exceed the requirements
established by state, federal or other agencies with
jurisdiction over discharges to receiving waters.
12 Antimony and beryllium greater than 1.0 mct/1.
Sec. 18-154. Technical
based local limits.
(a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals
greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic
materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on
the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods"
are:
14
(1) Arsenic: ^~-~~~ .25 mg/1
(2) Barium: 5.0 mg/1
(3) Boron: ~ 1.0 mg/1
(4) Cadmium: 0.02 mg/1
(5) Chromium, Total: ~ 2.0 mq/1
(6) Chromium VI: .011 mq~
-f6} S7~ Copper: 1.0 mg/1
{-~} ~ Lead: ~ .2 mg/1
-(~} _( 9_L Manganese : 1.0 mg/1
-f 9-} 10 Mercury: 0.005 mg/1
-(~6-} 11 Nickel: j~ 2.0 mg/1
-~1~} 12 Selenium: 0.02 mg/1
{~} 13 Silver: 0.1 mg/1
{~} 14 Z inc : 2 .0 mg/ 1
-F~} 15 Cyanide : 1. 0 mg/ 1
In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters
exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment
plant, an adjustment in the give n parameter concentration limit will be
required. To accomplish this, the industrial discharge permits for
industries discharging the par ticular compound will be adjusted to
insure compliance.
(c) No other heavy metals or toxic materials shall be discharged
into public sewers without a permit from the approving authority
specifying conditions of pretreatment, concentrations, volumes and other
applicable provisions.
(d) Prohibited toxic materials include, but are
15
not limited to:
{3-~-~~~
{~}- ~, Herbicides.
~-~} j2Z Fungicides.
{~} S3~ Pesticides.
Sec. 18-155. Discharge of garbage.
(a) No person may discharge garbage into public sewers, unless it
is shredded to a degree that all particles can be carried freely under
the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers. Particles
greater than one-half inch in any dimension are prohibited.
(b) The approving authority shall have the right to review and
approve the installation and operation of any garbage grinder equipped
with a motor of three-fourths horsepower (0.76 hp metric) or greater.
Sec. 18-156. Discharge of storm water and other unpolluted drainage.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sanitary sewers:
(1) Unpolluted storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof
runoff or subsurface drainage.
16
{~}-~ Other unpolluted drainage.
(b) The approving authority shall designate storm sewers and other
watercourses into which unpolluted drainage described in subsection (a)
of this section may be discharged.
Sec. 18-157. Temperature of discharges.
No person shall discharge liquid or vapor having a temperature
higher than one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (65° Centigrade),
or any substance which causes the temperature of the total wastewater
treatment plant influent to increase at a rate of ten (10) degrees
Fahrenheit or more per hour, or a combined total increase of plant
influent temperature to one hundred four (104) degrees Fahrenheit.
Sec. 18-158. Discharge of radioactive wastes.
(a) No person shall discharge radioactive wastes or isotopes into
public sewers, without the permission of the approving authority.
(b) The approving authority reserves the right to establish, in
compliance with applicable state and federal regulations, regulations
for discharge of radioactive waste into public sewers.
Sec. 18-159 Discharge of substances capable of impairing, etc.
facilities.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance
capable of causing:
(1) Obstruction to the flow in sewers;
(2) Interference with the operation of treatment processes
or facilities; or
(3) Excessive loading of treatment facilities.
17
(b) Discharges prohibited by subsection (a) of this section
include, but are not limited to, materials which exert or cause
concentrations of:
(1) ~z Inert suspended solids greater than 250 mg/1
including, but not limited to Fuller's earth, lime
slurries and lime residues.
(2) Dissolved solids greater than 500 mg/1 including, but not
limited to sodium chlorine and sodium sulfate.
(3) Excessive discoloration including, but not limited to dye
wastes and vegetable tanning solutions.
(4) Wastes having a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5 to 1.
Industries having wastewater of this nature shall provide pretreatment
as required by the approving authority.
(c) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance
that may:
(1) Deposit grease or oil in the sewer lines in such a manner
as to clog the sewers;
(2) Overload skimming and grease handling equipment;
(3) Pass to the receiving waters without being effectively
treated by normal wastewater treatment processes due to
the nonamenability of the substance to bacterial action;
or
(4) Deleteriously affect the treatment process due to
excessive quantities.
(d) No person shall discharge incompatible waste into public
sewers which:
18
(1) Is not amenable to treatment or reduction by the
wastewater treatment processes and facilities employed;
or
(2) Is amenable to treatment only to such a degree that the
treatment plant effluent cannot meet the requirements of
other agencies having jurisdiction over discharges to the
receiving waters. Subsection (b) (3) of this section
illustrates the types of substances intended to be
regulated by this subsection.
(e) The approving authority shall regulate the flow and
concentration of slugs when they may:
(1) Impair the treatment process;
(2) Cause damage to collection facilities;
(3) Incur treatment costs exceeding those for normal
wastewater; or
(4) Render the waste unfit for stream disposal or industrial
use.
Industrial operations which, on occasion, release sludges of waterborne
wastes into the sewers, or which, on occasion, release any significant
quantities of materials which adversely influence the effectiveness of
treatment in the wastewater treatment plant shall notify the plant in
advance of their release, and shall control, at the discretion of the
approving authority, the rate of release of these wastes. Permission
for such planned releases shall not be unreasonably withheld. Persons
failing to comply with these requirements shall be subject to a fine of
not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per incident, and shall
19
also be liable for the payment of any damages caused, either directly
or indirectly, by the unapproved discharge.
(f) No person shall discharge into public sewers solid or viscous
substances which violate subsection (a)of this section, if present in
sufficient quantity or size, including but not limited to:
(1) Ashes.
(2) Cinders.
(3) Sand.
(4) Mud.
(5) Straw.
(6) Shavings.
(7) Metal.
(8) Glass.
(9) Rags.
(10) Feathers.
(11) Tar.
(12) Plastics.
(13) Wood.
(14) Unground garbage.
(15) Whole blood.
(16) Paunch manure.
(17) Hair and fleshings.
(18) Entrails.
(19) Paper products, either whole or ground by garbage
grinders
(20) Slops.
20
(21) Chemical residues.
(22) Paint residues.
(23) Bulk solids.
(g) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants
which cause interference or pass through.
(h) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants
with a high flow rate or concentration of conventional pollutants as to
interfere with the plant.
Sec. 18-160. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to reject
discharges.
(a) If discharges or proposed discharges into public sewers may
deleteriously affect wastewater facilities, processes, equipment or
receiving waters; create a hazard to life or health; or create a public
nuisance; the approving authority shall require:
(1) Pretreatment to an acceptable condition before discharge
into the public sewers;
(2) Control over the quantities and rates of discharge; and
(3) Payment to cover the cost of handling and treating the
wastes, in addition to capital costs.
(b) The approving authority shall reject wastes when he determines
that a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection (a)
of this section and the discharger does not meet the requirements of
subsection (a) of this section.
(c) No person shall utilize dilution as a means of treatment.
(d) The app roving authority shall have the ri ght to determine
whether a dischar ge or p roposed discharge is included under subsection
21
(a) of this section.
Sec. 18-161. Desiqn, installation and maintenance of pretreatment and
control facilities.
(a) If pretreatment or control is required, the approving
authority may, at his sole discretion, require, review and approve the
design and installation of equipment and processes. The design and
installation of such equipment and processes shall conform to all
applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and other laws, including Federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards.
(b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring pretreatment,
flow-equalizing or other facilities shall provide and maintain the
facilities in effective operating condition at this own expense.
Sec.18-162. Requirements for traps.
(a) Discharges requiring a trap include:
(1) Grease or waste containing grease in excessive amounts;
(2) Oil;
(3) Sand;
(4) Flammable wastes; and
(5) Other harmful substances.
(b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring a trap shall,
at his own expense and as required by the approving authority:
(1) Provide equipment and facilities of a type and capacity
approved by the approving authority;
(2) Locate the trap in a manner that provides ready and easy
accessibility for cleaning and inspection; and
(3) Maintain the trap in effective operating condition.
22
Sec. 18-163. Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of discharges.
(a) The owner of each facility discharging other than normal
wastewater or discharging Class A wastewater shall submit monthly, or
at such other frequency as may be required by the approving authority,
to the County, on forms supplied by the County, a certified statement
of the quantities of its wastes discharged into the sewers and sewage
works of the County or into any sewer connected therewith. Copies of
pertinent water bills may be required to be submitted with the above
statement. Such documents shall be filed with the County not later than
the tenth day of the following month. A separate statement shall be
filed for each industrial plant. The total quantities of wastes to be
measured and certified by the person so discharging shall be established
by the approving authority and shall, as a minimum, include:
(1) Liquid in gallons.
(2) Five-day BOD in pounds.
(3) Suspended solids in pounds, on a dry solids basis.
(4) Total phosphorus in pounds.
(5) Total Kjeldahl nitrogen in pounds.
(6) COD in pounds.
(b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement, test, sampling,
or analysis required to be made hereunder shall be made in accordance
with 40 C.F.R. Part 136, as amended.
(c) In order to provide for accurate sampling and measurement of
industrial wastes, each person discharging Class A wastewater shall
provide and maintain, on each of its industrial waste outlet sewers, a
large manhole or sampling chamber to be located outside or near its
23
plant boundary line, where feasible. If inside the plant fence, there
shall be a gate near the sampling chamber with a key furnished to the
County. There shall be ample room provided in each sampling chamber to
enable convenient inspection and sampling by the County.
(d) Each sampling chamber shall contain a Parshall flume, accurate
weir or similar device, with a recording and totalizing register for
measurement of the liquid quantity; or the metered water supply to the
industrial plant may be used as the liquid quantity, where it is
substantiated that the metered water supply and waste quantities are
approximately the same, or where a measurable adjustment can be made in
the metered supply to determine the liquid quantity.
(e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly refrigerated and
composited in proportion to the flow for a representative twenty-four
(24)hours sample. For oil and grease, pH, phenols, cyanide, volatile
toxic organic and other appropriate pollutants, property grab sampling
shall be performed. Each sampling shall be repeated on as many days as
necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire reporting
period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in quantities of
wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced automatically by the
flow-measuring device.
(f) Minimum requirements for representative quantities under this
section shall include re-evaluation during each twelve (12) month
period. The determination of representative quantities shall include not
less than seven (7) consecutive days of twenty-four (24) hour composite
samplings, taken during periods of normal operation, together with
acceptable flow measurements. The frequency of sampling, sampling
24
chamber, metering device, sampling methods and analyses of samples shall
be subject, at any time, to inspection and verification by the County.
Sampling and measuring facilities shall be such as to provide safe
access for authorized personnel of the County for making such inspection
and verification.
(g) Plans for sampling chambers, with their locations shown on a
site plan, shall be submitted to the County for approval.
(h) All owners of facilities governed by this section shall also
comply with any applicable Monitoring Requirements and Regulations
established by the approving authority which are hereby incorporated by
reference.
(i) All owners of facilities governed by this article shall comply
with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 as amended, which
is incorporated by reference herein, including, without limitation, the
signatory, certification and record keeping requirements of 40 C.F.R.
403.12 (c),(d), (i), and (1). All records shall be retained for a
minimum of three years and this retention period shall be extended
during litigation or upon request of the approving authority.
Sj.,1 Samt~linct for discharge limit compliance shall be taken at the
sampling chamber without any dilution factor except for proUerly
classified catectorical or significant users.
ik~ Sampling for prohibited materials may be collected_at either
the sampling chamber or end of process to determine the absence of the
prohibited material.
Sec. 18-164. Discharge permits for industrial waste.
25
J- C i. L. ' ~ cu v -
/ ~
~ ~ '
~
a te
~
' } O •7
~ -TtTG
RATITrG[-1 i[[u.~ a
.
r
/ ~
9t-s~i~i°E~S ~ i ~
26
(a) It shall be unlawful for any significant industrial user or
other user as determined by the approving authority to dischar e
industrial waste into the public sanitary sewer system -unless an
appropriate Industrial Discharae Permit has been issued by the approvina
authority In order to obtain an Industrial Discharae Permit, such
person shall.
~_ Submit a complete application at least ninety (90) days
prior to the date proposed for initial discharae on forms
suQplied by the approving authority The approvina
authority will act upon the application within sixty (60)
days.
~_ Comply- with all reauirements for the discharae permit
including, but not limited to provisions for payment of
charges, installation and operation of pretreatment
facilities and samQling and analysis to determine
~antity and strength.
X31 Provide a sampling point subject to the provisions of
this article and approval of the approvina authority.
i4~ Comply with the requirements of federal categorical
standards, where applicable including the development
of any required compliance schedules or the applicable
provisions of this article.
(b) An industrial user applying for a new discharge shall meet all
conditions of subsection (a) of this section and shall secure a permit
prior to discharging any waste.
(c) A person not applying for a discharge permit within the
27
allotted time and continuing to discharge an unpermitted discharge shall
be deemed to be in violation of this article.
(d) A permit issued under this section shall be valid for up to
five (5) years from its date of issuance, after which time the
industrial user shall be required to obtain a new discharge permit.
(e) The approving authority shall have the right to accept or
reject any increases in flow or pollutants under existing or new
permits.
Sec. 18-165. Waiver or modification of requirements of article.
The approving authority shall have the right to waive or modify,
on an interim basis to be noted in any permit issued under this article,
the requirements of this article as they pertain to strength of
contaminants. No such waiver or modification shall be granted contrary
to any County, state or federal regulation and no waiver or modification
shall be granted, if it would result in the violation of the discharge
permit for the plant, as it is now issued or as such permit may be
amended.
sec. 18-166. Charged generally.
Persons making discharges of industrial waste shall pay a charge
to cover the cost of collection and treatment in addition to capital
costs. When a permit application for industrial waste is approved, the
County or its authorized representative shall issue a permit stating:
(a) The terms of acceptance by the County; and
(b) The basis of payment.
Sec. 18-167. User charges and added costs.
(a) If the volume or character of the waste to be treated by the
28
plant meets the requirements of other provisions of this article and
does not cause overloading of the sewage collection, treatment or
disposal facilities of the County, the approving authority shall require
that the discharger pay a charge to be determined from the schedule of
charges which shall include capital costs.
(b) If a proposed discharge of waste is responsible for exceeding
the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities and the
wastewater treatment plant must be upgraded, expanded or enlarged in
order to treat the wastewater, the approving authority shall require
that the discharger pay in full all added costs which shall include
capital costs the County may incur due to acceptance of the wastewater.
(c) The schedule of charges pursuant to subsection (a) of this
section shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) Capital costs, including debt retirement and interest on
debt, of the County's cost on all capital outlays for
collecting and treating the waste, including new capital
outlay and the proportionate part of the value of the
existing system used in handling and treating waste.
(2) Operation and maintenance costs (capitalized), including
but not limited to, salaries and wages, power costs,
costs of chemicals and supplies, proper allowances for
maintenance, depreciation, overhead and office expense.
Sec. 18-168. Schedule of charges.
(a) Persons discharging wastewater shall pay a charge to cover the
capital cost and the cost of collection and treatment of all wastewater
discharged.
29
(1) All Class I users discharging normal wastewater or Group
B wastewater shall pay a user charge computed upon cost
per volume of wastewater discharged.
(2) All Class II users discharging Group A wastewater shall
have their user charge computed upon a cost per unit
volume basis for the amount plus the unit cost of
treatment for all over the base amount for volume,
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (SS),
phosphorus (P) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). In
computing the contaminant loading, the parameter
concentrations for normal wastewater will be considered
as standard strength in determining the base amount in
the effluent discharge flow.
Initially, the responsibility for determining the contaminant
loading for each category of establishment will be that of the approving
authority. However, each establishment must verify its own contaminant
loading monthly by initiating a sampling and analytical program at its
own expense and with the approval of the approving authority.
(b) The units costs to be used to compute the charge for Class I
and II users shall be established by the approving authority. The unit
costs for all users and the allowances for normal wastewater for users
may be revised as necessary to correspond to current costs and
experience. Revisions may be made, no more often than once a year, upon
approval of the approving authority. The user charge for users shall
be computed as follows:
Class I Users: Cu = Vu x Vd
30
Class II Users:
CS = Vu x Vd + VSVc + BSBc + SSSc + PSPc + NSNc
And:
Cu Charge for Class I users
CS = Charge for Class II users
V = Unit cost of treatment chargeable to normal wastewater ($/1,000
u
gal.)
Vd = Volume of wastewater from normal wastewater (1,000 gals.)
V = Volume of Class II wastewater (1,000 gals.) in excess of Class I
s
wastewater
Vc = Cost of treating 1,000 gals. of Class II wastewater ($/1,000 gal.)
IJ3T` -~. ~i3 T T } e~IfLTG~~PD GeSlLZT77'Lt~rG~ ~1~e'~i ~e1 R..ZZ~'rg~
B - Class II wastewater BOD contribution in excess of Class I
-s
wastewater limit (lbs.)
Bc = Cost of treating Class II BOD contribution ($/lb.)
S =Class II wastewater SS contribution in excess of Class I wastewater
s
limit (lbs.)
S'c = Cost of` treating Class II SS contribution ($/lb.)
t'G-`C-i agZi eZ TrCA'~S2T~ /"1 l T T L. ...L....... ~ .~ +. ~ L. 1 ~ ...~. / C / 1 L. \
r wr IJYV1V1f l Y/
P - Class II wastewater phosphorus contribution in excess of Class I
-s
wastewater limit (lbs.)
N =Class II wastewater unoxidized nitrogen contribution in excess of
s
Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Nc = Cost of treating Class II nitrogen contribution ($/lb.)
31
Sec. 18-169. Adjustment of charges.
(a) The county may adjust charges at least annually to reflect
changes in the characteristics of wastewater based on the results of
sampling and testing. This adjustment will correspond to charges
established by the operating authority for the treatment plant.
(b) The county shall review at least annually the basis for
determining charges and shall adjust the unit treatment cost in the
formula to reflect increases or decreases in wastewater treatment costs
based on the previous year's experience.
Sec. 18-170. Billing and payment of charges.
(a) The county may bill the discharger by the month or by the
quarter and shall show waste charges as a separate item on the regular
bill for water and sewer charges. The discharger shall pay in
accordance with practices existing for payment of sewer charges.
(b) In addition to sanctions provided for by this article, the
County is entitled to exercise sanctions provided for by the other
ordinances of the County for failure to pay the bill for water and
sanitary sewer service when due.
Sec. 18-171. Right of entry to enforce article.
(a) The approving authority and other duly authorized employees
of the County bearing proper credentials and identification shall be
authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable
time for the purpose of enforcing this article for sampling purposes,
inspect monitoring equipment and to inspect and copy all documents
relevant to the enforcement of this article, including, without
limitation, monitoring reports. Anyone acting under this authority
32
shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning
safety, internal security, and fire protection.
~~.~,
~~-
~_ Appropriate information submitted to the approvinct authority
,pursuant to these regulations excluding any information utilized in
determining effluent limits may be claimed as confidential by the
submitter at the time of submission by stampinu the words "confidential
business information" on each page containing such information. If a
claim is asserted the information shall be treated in accordance with
applicable law.
(c) No person acting under authority of this section may inquire
into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining,
ceramic, paper or other industries, beyond that point having a direct
bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the public sewers.
G1Ci llll 1V uuv~.i r~..w, v~~v ,r~~~~~~.. ~.~~___ ______
33
Sec. 18-172. Authority to disconnect service.
(a) The county reserves the right to terminate water and
wastewater disposal services and disconnect a customer from the system
and revoke any discharge permit issued under this article when:
(1) Acids or chemicals damaging to sewer lines or treatment
process are released into the sewer causing rapid
deterioration of these structures or interfering with
proper conveyance and treatment of wastewater;
(2) A governmental agency informs the County that the
effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is no longer
a quality permitted for discharge into a watercourse, and
it is found that the customer is delivering wastewater
to the County's system that cannot be sufficiently
treated or requires treatment that is not provided by the
County as normal domestic treatment; or
(3) The customer:
a. Discharges industrial waste or wastewater that is in
violation of the permit issued by the approving
authority;
b. Discharges wastewater at an uncontrolled, variable
rate in sufficient quantity to cause an imbalance in the
wastewater treatment system;
c. Fails to pay bills for water and sanitary sewer
services when due; or
d. Repeats a discharge of prohibited wastes into public
sewers.
34
(4) The permittee has engaged in fraudulent reporting to the
approval authority or failed to report adequately as
required changes in discharge.
(b) If the service is disconnected pursuant to subsection (a) (2)
of this section, the County shall:
(1) Disconnect the customer;
(2) Supply the customer with the governmental agency's report
and provide the customer with all pertinent information;
and
(3) Continue disconnection until such time as the customer
provides additional pretreatment or other facilities
designed to remove the objectionable characteristics from
this wastes.
Sec. 18-173. Notice of violations
The county shall serve persons discharging in violation of this
article with written notice stating the nature of the violation and
requiring immediate satisfactory compliance.
The approving authority shall have the authority to publish
annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or a newspaper
of general circulation in the Roanoke area a list of persons which were
not in compliance with the terms of this Article at least once during
the twelve (12) previous months.
Sec. 18-17d. Penalty for violations.
(a) A person who violates the provisions of this article shall be
guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable by a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation per day and
confinement in jail for not more than twelve months, either or both.
In the event of a violation, the approving authority shall also have the
right to terminate the sewer and waSer connection.
(b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-section (a)
of this section, the County is entitled to pursue all other criminal and
civil remedies to which it is entitled under authority of state statues
or other ordinances of the County against a person continuing prohibited
discharges, including, without limitation, injunctive relief.
~ Any person who knowingly makes anv false statements,
representations or certifications in anv application record, report,
plan or other document files required to be maintained pursuant to this
ordinance, or wastewater permit or who falsifies, tampers with, or
knowingly renders inaccurate anv monitoring device or method required
under this ordinance shall upon conviction be punishable by a fine of
$1 000 00 per violation, per day or imprisonment for not more than one
year, or both.
~_ The approving authority shall be authorized to implement such
other ro ram and enforcement mechanisms as are consistent with
regulatory guidelines and are deemed appropriate.
Sec. 18-175. Payment of costs for work required by prohibited
deposits.
In any case where a sewer main or pipe connection is stopped,
damaged or choked by any materials or rubbish being deposited therein
contrary to the provisions of this article, by any tenant or property
owner, upon due ascertainment by the County Administrator, he shall
cause the main pipe connection or manhole to be opened, cleaned,
replaced or repaired, and shall cause the cost for doing such work to
be collected from the property owner. The payment of such cost shall
not relieve any person from prosecution for a violation of this article.
Sec. 18-176. Public access to data.
36
Effluent data complied as part of the approving authority's
pretreatment program shall be available to the public.
2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after December 1, 1991.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Circuit Court
Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk
Familv Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Chief Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
John H. Cease, Police Chief
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
37
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER "`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Continuation of Second Reading for Ordinance Amending
Article III, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 16 of
the Roanoke County Code of 1971 (Chapter 18 of the
Roanoke County Code of 1985)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~~,~,~,.~,~ .~~~
~~
BACKGROUND'
The 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and
Roanoke County requires the County to adopt such ordinances and
regulations that conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke
as they pertain to Sewer Use Standards. The County of Roanoke
adopted Ordinance 62486-146 on June 24, 1986 and Ordinance
91289-14 amending Ordinance 62486-146 on September 12, 1989 in
order to meet the above requirements. Recent requirements of the
State Water Control Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
have required the City of Roanoke to amend their Sewer Use
Standards.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is the proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Sewer Use
Standards that are required so that our Ordinance conforms to the
form and intent of the City of Roanoke Ordinance which was adopted
on October 14, 1991.
Section 153 and 154 of the Ordinance is amended to eliminate
Bismuth, Cobalt, Molybdenum, Rhenium, Strontium, Tellurium, and
Uranium Ion from regulated status and increase the discharge limits
for Anitimony and Beryllium from prohibited to 1.0 mg/l. The above
amendments include the items requested by County users at the
public hearing.
The first reading of this Ordinance was held on July 9, 1991 and
a second reading was held on July 23, 1991. Adoption was withheld
pending the adoption by the City of their Ordinance to include the
above mentioned items.
Z"- 3
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
There is no practical alternative to adopting this Ordinance.
Adoption is required by the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Ordinance be adopted after the second
reading with an effective date of November 20, 1991.
SUBMITTED BY:
.1
~~' )
Cliffo raig, P. .
Utility Director
APPROVED:
~,~ ~~J
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE IV, SEWER
USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE OF 1985 (formerly, Article III, of Chapter 16
of the Roanoke County Code of 1971).
WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement entered into by
and between, and still binding upon, Roanoke City and the County of
Roanoke requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations as
necessary to conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they
pertain to Sewer Use Standards; and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance # 62486-146, § 1, adopted on June 24,
1986, Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 was amended to add
an Article III relative to sewer use standards and by Ordinance # 91289-
14, adopted on September 12, 1989, said Article was further amended; and
WHEREAS, recent regulatory requirements enacted by the State
Water Control Board and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency have
necessitated changes by the City of Roanoke to its Sewer Use Standards;
and
WHEREAS, the operative requirements of the current Sewage
Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and the County of Roanoke
requires amendment of the County's ordinances to bring them into
conformity with the current Roanoke City Sewer Use Standards; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July
9, 1991, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 23,
1991, and continued to November 19, 1991.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1
~A
1. That the amended "SEWER USE STANDARDS" be reenacted as
"ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS" of CHAPTER 18 of the Roanoke County
Code of 1985.
CHAPTER 18
ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS
Sec. 18-151 Definitions.
For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases set out in
this section shall have the following meanings:
Act means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., as amended.
Approving Authority for purposes of this Article only shall mean the
county administrator or his duly authorized representative and shall be
equivalent to control authority.
BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) means the quantity of oxygen by weight,
expressed in mg/1, utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic
matter under standard laboratory conditions for five (5) days at a
temperature of twenty (20) degrees centigrade.
Building sewer means the extension from the building drain to the public
sewer or other place of disposal (also called house lateral and house
connection).
Categorical Standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards
or Pretreatment Standard.
Capital costs means a sum sufficient recovered by user charges computed
by using the capital recover factor for the average life of all capital
items including capitalized O & M charges (unless collected separately)
on which expenditures have been made or will have to be made for
2
~ =3
wastewater treatment facilities, processes or transmission lines.
Capital costs may be adjusted from time to time to reflect cost
experience.
Categorical standards means National Categorical Pretreatment Standards or Pretreatmefar
Standard.
Class I user means any person discharging normal domestic wastewater
into a sanitary sewer and any industrial user discharging Group B
wastewater into the sanitary sewer.
Class II user means any person discharging Group A wastewater into a
sanitary sewer.
COD (chemical oxygen demand) means the measure, expressed in mg/1, of the
oxygen consuming capacity of inorganic and organic matter present in
water or wastewater, expressing the amount of oxygen consumed from a
chemical oxidant in a specific test, but not differentiating between
stable and unstable organic matter and thus not necessarily correlating
with biochemical oxygen demand.
COD-BOD ratio means the ratio of the value of COD to BOD as these
values are defined above.
COD (soluble) means the COD of the filtrate from wastewater that is
filtered through a gooch crucible as required by the suspended solids
test in "Standard Methods."
Control manhole means a manhole giving access to a building sewer at
some point before the building sewer discharge mixes with other
discharges in the public sewer.
Control point means a point of access to a course of discharge before
3
~~
the discharge mixes with other discharges in the public sewer.
County means Roanoke County.
Discharge means any introduction of substances into the sanitary
sewer.
Garbage means animal and vegetable wastes and residue from the
preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the handling,
processing, storage and sale of food products and produce.
GroupA wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers
in which any one of the parameters below are more than the given
loading:
Average Daily
Parameter Monthly Composite
Total suspended solids (TSS) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) 62.5 lbs./day 75 lbs./day
Total phosphorus (TP) 3.75 lbs./day 4.5 lbs./day
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) 4.50 lbs./day 5.4 lbs./day
Group B wastewater means the discharge of permitted industrial
wastewater not otherwise qualifying as Group A wastewater.
Incompatible waste means a waste which is not susceptible to adequate
treatment by the wastewater treatment plant.
Industrial user means any user of publicly owned treatment works
identified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987,
Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under
divisions A, B,D, E, and I, including governmental facilities that
discharge wastewater to the plant.
4
,~" ,~"`
Industrial waste means waste resulting from any process of industry,
manufacturing, trade or business from the development of any natural
resource, or any mixture of the waste with water or normal wastewater,
or distinct from normal wastewater.
Infiltration means water entering a sewer system, including service
connections from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to,
defective pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls.
Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from inflow.
Inflow means water discharged into a sewer system, including service
connections, from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders,
cellar,yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water
discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross
connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm
waters, surface runoff, street wash waters, or drainage. It does not
include, and is distinguished from infiltration.
Interference means a discharge which, along or in conjunction with a
discharge or discharges from other sources, (1) inhibits or disrupts the
plant, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes,
use or disposal; or (2) causes a violation of the plant's VPDES permit.
Milligrams per liter (mg/1) means the same as parts per million and is a
weight-to-volume ratio; the milligram-per liter value multiplied by the
factor 8.34 shall be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water.
,National categorical pretreatment standard or pretreatment standard means any
regulations containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the EPA
in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 1317)
5
...~
and 40 C.F.R. Subchapter N (Parts 401-471) as amended, which applies to
a specific category of industrial users.
Natural outlet means any outlet into a watercourse, ditch, lake or other
body of surface water or ground water.
Normal wastewater means wastewater discharged into the sanitary sewers
in which the average concentration of total suspended solids and BOD is
not more than 250 mg/1, total phosphorus is not more than 15 mg/1, total
Kjeldahl nitrogen is not more than 18 mg/1 and total flow is not more
than 25,000 gallons per day.
Overload means the imposition of organic or hydraulic loading on a
treatment facility in excess of its engineered design capacity.
Pass through means a discharge which exits the plant into water of the
United States in quantities which may cause a violation of the plant's
VPDES permit.
Person includes individual, corporation, organization, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust,
partnership association and any other legal entity.
pH means the logarithm (base 10) of the reciprocal of the hydrogen
ion concentration expressed in grams per liter.
Phosphorus (total) means the sum of the various types of phosphate
expressed as elemental phosphorus found in wastewater. The various
forms include ortho phosphate, condensed phosphates (pyro, meta, and
poly-phosphates), and organically bound phosphates. The concentration
of total phosphate is determined by the "Standard Methods" test
procedure.
6
1 ~~
Plant means the City of Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant, e~
Public sewer means pipe or conduit carrying wastewater or unpolluted
drainage in which owners of abutting properties shall have the use,
subject to control by the County.
Sanitary sewer means a public sewer that conveys domestic wastewater or
industrial wastes or a combination of both, and into which storm water,
surface water, groundwater and other unpolluted wastes are not
intentionally passed.
Slug means any discharge of water, wastewater or industrial waste
which, in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow,
exceeds, for any period longer than fifteen (15) minutes, more than five
(5) times the average twenty-four (24) hour concentration or flows
during normal operation.
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) means classification pursuant to the
Standard Industrial Classification Manual issued by the Executive Office
of t-~i~res}ei '- , ^" ' ee-e Management and
Budctet 1987 as amended.
Standard Methods means the examination and analytical procedures set
forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of "Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as prepared,
approved and published jointly by the American Public Health
Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water
Pollution Control Federation.
Storm sewer means a public sewer which carries storm and surface water
7
~--
and drainage and into which domestic wastewater or industrial wastes are
not intentionally passed.
Storm water means rainfall or any other forms of precipitation.
Suspended solids means solids measured in mg/1 that either float on the
surface of, or are in suspension in, water, wastewater or other liquids,
and which are largely removable by a laboratory filtration device.
To discharge includes to deposit, conduct, drain, emit, throw, run,
allow to seep or otherwise release or dispose of, or to allow, permit or
suffer any of these acts or omissions.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen means the combined ammonia and organic nitrogen in
a given wastewater, as measured by the "Standard Methods" test
procedure. It does not include nitrite and nitrate nitrogen.
Trap means a device designed to skim, settle or otherwise remove
grease, oil, sand, flammable wastes or other harmful substances.
Unpolluted wastewater means water containing:
(1) No fee or emulsified grease or oil.
(2) No acids or alkalis.
(3) No phenols or other substances producing taste or odor in
receiving water.
(4) No toxic or poisonous substances in suspension, colloidal
state or solution.
(5) No noxious or otherwise obnoxious or odorous gases.
(6) Not more than ten (10) mg/1 each of suspended solids and BOD.
(7) Color not exceeding fifty (50) units, as measured by the
Platinum-Cobalt method of determination, as specified in
8
..
,~
"Standard Methods."
User charge means the charge made to those persons who discharge normal
wastewater into the County's sewage system. This charge shall include
a proportionate share of any capital improvements to the system (capital
costs).
User surcharge means the charge made, in excess of the user charge, for
all wastewater over and above the loading defined as normal wastewater.
Waste means rejected, unutilized or superfluous substances, in
liquid, gaseous or solid form, resulting from domestic, agricultural or
industrial activities.
Wastewater means a combination of the water-carried waste from
residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial
establishments, together with any ground, surface and storm water that
may be present.
Wastewater facilities includes all facilities for collection, pumping,
treating and disposing of wastewater and industrial wastes.
Wastewater service charge means the charge on all users of the public sewer
whose wastes are treated at the plant and is the appropriate sum of the
user charge and user surcharge.
Wastewater treatment plant means any municipal-owned facilities, devices
and structures used for receiving, processing and treating wastewater,
industrial waste and sludges from the sanitary sewers.
Wastecourse means a natural or man-made channel in which a flow of
water occurs, either continuously or intermittently.
Sec. 18-152. General Requirements.
9
r
(a) All discharges into public
requirements of this article;- however,
sewers shall conform to
the federal categorical
pretreatment standards or any standards imposed by the state water
control board or its successor in authority are hereby incorporated by
reference where applicable and where such standards are more stringent
than those set forth in this article.
(b)
~~rrta~-gem j '~e~-e~~e No
significant industrial user or other user as determined by the approvina
authority shall discharae industrial wastewaters into the sanitary sewer
system without an appropriate industrial waste discharae permit as
provided in this article.
(c) Unless exception is granted by the approving authority or by
other provisions of this chapter, the public sewer system shall be used
by all persons discharging wastewater, industrial waste, polluted
liquids or unpolluted waters or liquids.
(d) Unless authorized by the State Water Control Board or its
successor in authority, no person shall deposit or discharge any waste
included in subsection (c) of this section on public or private property
in or adjacent to any natural outlet, watercourse, storm sewer or other
area within the jurisdiction of the County.
(e) The approving authority shall determine, prior to discharge,
that wastes to be discharged will receive such treatment as is required
by the laws, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders of federal, state
and local authorities, or such discharge shall not be permitted.
(f) Each industrial user discharging industrial waste waters into
10
~3
the sanitary sewer system shall provide protection from accidental
discharge of prohibited materials or other substances regulated by this
Article. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited
materials shall be provided and maintained at the owner or user's own
cost and expense. Detailed plans showing facilities and operating
procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the
approving authority before construction of the facility. All such
existing users shall complete such a plan by July 1, 1986. No such user
who commences operation after the effective date of this section shall
be permitted to introduce pollutants into the system until accidental
discharge procedures have been so approved. Review and approval of such
plans and operating procedures shall not relieve the industrial user
from the responsibility to modify the user's facility as necessary to
meet the requirements of this Article. In the case of an accidental
discharge, it is the responsibility of the user to immediately telephone
and notify the approving authority of the incident. The notification
shall include location of discharge, type of waste, concentration and
volume and corrective actions.
Within five (5) days following an accidental discharge; the user
shall submit to the approving authority a detailed written report
describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by
the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall
not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability
which may be incurred as a result of damage to the sewer system or
treatment plant, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property;
nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil
11
s3
penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by this article or
other applicable law.
A notice shall be permanently posted on the user's bulletin board
or other prominent place advising employees whom to call in the event of
a dangerous discharge. Employers shall insure that all employees who
may cause or suffer such a dangerous discharge to occur are advised of
the emergency notification procedure.
(g) In the event of an emergency, as determined by the approving
authority, the approving authority shall be authorized to immediately
halt any actual or threatened discharge.
(h) A person discharging in violation of the provisions of this
article, within thirty (30) days of the date of such discharge, shall
sample, analyze and submit the data to the approving authority unless
the approving authority elects to perform such sampling.
Sec. 18-153. Prohibited Discharges Generally.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any waste which,
by itself or by interaction with other wastes, may:
(1) Injure or interfere with wastewater treatment processes
or facilities;
(2) Constitute a hazard to humans or animals; or
(3) Create a hazard in receiving waters of the wastewater
treatment plant effluent.
Generate heat in amounts which will inhibit biological
activity in the plant resulting in interference, and in
no case heat in such cruantities that the temperature at
the plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Celsius (one hundred
12
.~
four (104) decrees Fahrenheit) unless the approving
authority approves alternate temperature limits.
(b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain:
(1) Antifreeze.
(2) Fluoride other than that contained in the public water
supply greater than 10.0 mg/l.
(3 ) "~ztirr6iLt~P4 ~ Yi e'6rr~crriz~r6i~9 ~i'ca~ce~- czzca::- ~,» .~.y j ~
Benzene, Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX) greater
than 5.0 mq/1.
' Flammable or
explosive liquid solid or gas in hazardous amounts.
(5) Substances causing a chemical oxygen demand (COD) greater
than 1,500 mg/1 in the wastewater.
(6) Strong acid or concentrated plating solutions, whether
neutralized or not.
(7) Fats, wax, grease or oils, whether emulsified or not, in
excess of 100 mg/1 or containing substances which may
solidify or become viscous at temperatures between
thirty-two (32°) degrees and one hundred fifty (150)
degrees Fahrenheit (0° and 65~ Centigrade).
(8) Obnoxious, toxic or poisonous solids, liquids, or gases
in quantities sufficient to violate the provisions of
subsection (a) of this section.
(9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a Ph
13
13
lower than 5.5 or higher than 9.5, or any other substance
with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or
hazard to structures, equipment or personnel at the
wastewater facility.
(10) Substances which cause a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5.
(11) Waste, wastewater or any other substance containing
phenols, hydrogen sulfide or other taste-and-odor
producing substances that have not been minimized. After
treatment of the composite wastewater, effluent
concentration limits may not exceed the requirements
established by state, federal or other agencies with
jurisdiction over discharges to receiving waters.
12 Antimony and beryllium greater than 1.0 ma/1.
Sec. 18-154. Technical
based local limits.
(a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals
greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic
materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on
the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods"
are:
(1) Arsenic:
(2) Barium:
(3) Boron:
(4) Cadmium:
(5) Chromium, Total:
f} .25 mg/1
5.0 mg/1
~~ 1.0 mg/ 1
0.02 mg/1
r9-~~ 2 . 0 mg/ 1
14
~3
(6) Chromium VI: .011 mg/L.
f6} ~_ Copper: 1.0 mg/1
-(~- ,~8 ~ Lead : ~' • 2 mqL
{-8} x.91 Manganese: 1.0 mg/1
-{-9-}- 10 Mercury : 0.0 0 5 mg/ 1
{~~} 11 Nickel: 3:-A-~-/~ 2.0 mq/1
{~~ 12 Selenium: 0.02 mg/1
-~} 13 Silver: 0.1 mg/1
{-1-3~}- 14 Z inc : 2 . 0 mg/ 1
{~4} 15 Cvanide: 1.0 mg/1
In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters
exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment
plant, an adjustment in the given parameter concentration limit will be
required. To accomplish this, the industrial discharge permits for
industries discharging the particular compound will be adjusted to
insure compliance.
(c) No other heavy me tals or toxic materials shall be discharged
into public sewers withou t a permit from the approving authority
specifying conditions of pretreatment, concentrations, volumes and other
applicable provisions.
(d) Prohibited toxic materials include, but are
not limited to:
~-
~~
~-
~~
15
Z-~
~n~ R,,.~ ~, _
{-~6-}- ~ Herbicides .
{}~} j21 Fungicides.
-Fi-~-~ ~ Pesticides.
Sec. 18-155. Discharge of garbage.
(a) No person may discharge garbage into public sewers, unless it
is shredded to a degree that all particles can be carried freely under
the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers. Particles
greater than one-half inch in any dimension are prohibited.
(b) The approving authority shall have the right to review and
approve the installation and operation of any garbage grinder equipped
with a motor of three-fourths horsepower (0.76 hp metric) or greater.
Sec. 18-156. Discharge of storm water and other unpolluted drainage.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sanitary sewers:
(1) Unpolluted storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof
runoff or subsurface drainage.
{-~}~ Other unpolluted drainage.
(b) The approving authority shall designate storm sewers and other
watercourses into which unpolluted drainage described in subsection (a)
of this section may be discharged.
16
..~ 3
Sec. 18-157. Temperature of discharges.
No person shall discharge liquid or vapor having a temperature
higher than one hundred fifty (150) degrees Fahrenheit (65° Centigrade),
or any substance which causes the temperature of the total wastewater
treatment plant influent to increase at a rate of ten (10) degrees
Fahrenheit or more per hour, or a combined total increase of plant
influent temperature to one hundred four (104) degrees Fahrenheit.
Sec. 18-158. Discharge of radioactive wastes.
(a) No person shall discharge radioactive wastes or isotopes into
public sewers, without the permission of the approving authority.
(b) The approving authority reserves the right to establish, in
compliance with applicable state and federal regulations, regulations
for discharge of radioactive waste into public sewers.
Sec. 18-159 Discharge of substances capable of impairing, etc.
facilities.
(a) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance
capable of causing:
(1) Obstruction to the flow in sewers;
(2) Interference with the operation of treatment processes or
facilities; or
(3) Excessive loading of treatment facilities.
(b) Discharges prohibited by subsection (a) of this section
include, but are not limited to, materials which exert or cause
concentrations of:
(1) ~~ Inert suspended solids greater than 250 mg/1
including, but not limited to Fuller's earth, lime
17
1~
slurries and lime residues.
(2) Dissolved solids greater than 500 mg/1 including, but not
limited to sodium chlorine and sodium sulfate.
(3) Excessive discoloration including, but not limited to dye
wastes and vegetable tanning solutions.
(4) Wastes having a COD to BOD ratio greater than 5 to 1.
Industries having wastewater of this nature shall provide pretreatment
as required by the approving authority.
(c) No person shall discharge into public sewers any substance
that may:
(1) Deposit grease or oil in the sewer lines in such a manner
as to clog the sewers;
(2) Overload skimming and grease handling equipment;
(3) Pass to the receiving waters without being effectively
treated by normal wastewater treatment processes due to
the nonamenability of the substance to bacterial action;
or
(4) Deleteriously affect the treatment process due to
excessive quantities.
(d) No person shall discharge incompatible waste into public
sewers which:
(1) Is not amenable to treatment or reduction by the
wastewater treatment processes and facilities employed;
or
(2) Is amenable to treatment only to such a degree that the
treatment plant effluent cannot meet the requirements of
18
other agencies having jurisdiction over discharges to the
receiving waters. Subsection (b) (3) of this section
illustrates the types of substances intended to be
regulated by this subsection.
(e) The approving authority shall regulate the flow and
concentration of slugs when they may:
(1) Impair the treatment process;
(2) Cause damage to collection facilities;
(3) Incur treatment costs exceeding those for normal
wastewater; or
(4) Render the waste unfit for stream disposal or industrial
use.
Industrial operations which, on occasion, release sludges of waterborne
wastes into the sewers, or which, on occasion, release any significant
quantities of materials which adversely influence the effectiveness of
treatment in the wastewater treatment plant shall notify the plant in
advance of their release, and shall control, at the discretion of the
approving authority, the rate of release of these wastes. Permission
for such planned releases shall not be unreasonably withheld. Persons
failing to comply with these requirements shall be subject to a fine of
not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per incident, and shall
also be liable for the payment of any damages caused, either directly or
indirectly, by the unapproved discharge.
(f) No person shall discharge into public sewers solid or viscous
substances which violate subsection (a)of this section, if present in
sufficient quantity or size, including but not limited to:
19
Z-3
(1) Ashes.
(2) Cinders.
(3) Sand.
(4) Mud.
(5) Straw.
(6) Shavings.
(7) Metal.
(8) Glass.
(9) Rags.
(10) Feathers.
(11) Tar.
(12) Plastics.
(13) Wood.
(14) Unground garbage.
(15) Whole blood.
(16) Paunch manure.
(17) Hair and fleshings.
(18) Entrails.
(19) Paper products, either whole or ground by garbage
grinders
(20) Slops.
(21) Chemical residues.
(22) Paint residues.
(23) Bulk solids.
(g) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants
which cause interference or pass through.
20
~:
(h) No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants
with a high flow rate or concentration of conventional pollutants as to
interfere with the plant.
sec. 18-160. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to reject
discharges.
(a) If discharges or proposed discharges into public sewers may
deleteriously affect wastewater facilities, processes, equipment or
receiving waters; create a hazard to life or health; or create a public
nuisance; the approving authority shall require:
(1) Pretreatment to an acceptable condition before discharge
into the public sewers;
(2) Control over the quantities and rates of discharge; and
(3) Payment to cover the cost of handling and treating the
wastes, in addition to capital costs.
(b) The approving authority shall reject wastes when he determines
that a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection (a)
of this section and the discharger does not meet the requirements of
subsection (a) of this section.
(c) No person shall utilize dilution as a means of treatment.
jd) The approving authority shall have the riaht to determine
whether a discharge or proposed discharge is included under subsection
(aL of this section.
Sec. 18-161. Design, installation and maintenance of pretreatment and
control facilities.
(a) If pretreatment or control is required, the approving
authority may, at his sole discretion, require, review and approve the
21
~~
design and installation of equipment and processes. The design anc3
installation of such equipment and processes shall conform to all
applicable statutes, codes, ordinances and other laws, including Federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards.
(b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring pretreatment,
flow-equalizing or other facilities shall provide and maintain the
facilities in effective operating condition at this own expense.
Sec.18-162. Requirements for traps.
(a) Discharges requiring a trap include:
(1) Grease or waste containing grease in excessive amounts;
(2) Oil;
(3) Sand;
(4) Flammable wastes; and
(5) Other harmful substances.
(b) Any person responsible for discharges requiring a trap shall,
at his own expense and as required by the approving authority:
(1) Provide equipment and facilities of a type and capacity
approved by the approving authority;
(2) Locate the trap in a manner that provides ready and easy
accessibility for cleaning and inspection; and
(3) Maintain the trap in effective operating condition.
Sec. 18-163. Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of discharges.
(a) The owner of each facility discharging other than normal
wastewater or discharging Class A wastewater shall submit monthly, or at
such other frequency as may be required by the approving authority, to
the County, on forms supplied by the County, a certified statement of
22
~"- 3
the quantities of its wastes discharged into the sewers and sewage works
of the County or into any sewer connected therewith. Copies of
pertinent water bills may be required to be submitted with the above
statement. Such documents shall be filed with the County not later than
the tenth day of the following month. A separate statement shall be
filed for each industrial plant. The total quantities of wastes to be
measured and certified by the person so discharging shall be established
by the approving authority and shall, as a minimum, include:
(1) Liquid in gallons.
(2) Five-day BOD in pounds.
(3) Suspended solids in pounds, on a dry solids basis.
(4) Total phosphorus in pounds.
(5) Total Kjeldahl nitrogen in pounds.
(6) COD in pounds.
(b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement, test, sampling,
or analysis required to be made hereunder shall be made in accordance
with 40 C.F.R. Part 136, as amended.
(c) In order to provide for accurate sampling and measurement of
industrial wastes, each person discharging Class A wastewater shall
provide and maintain, on each of its industrial waste outlet sewers, a
large manhole or sampling chamber to be located outside or near its
plant boundary line, where feasible. If inside the plant fence, there
shall be a gate near the sampling chamber with a key furnished to the
County. There shall be ample room provided in each sampling chamber tc
enable convenient inspection and sampling by the County.
(d) Each sampling chamber shall contain a Parshall flume, accurate
23
i'
weir or similar device, with a recording and totalizing register for
measurement of the liquid quantity; or the metered water supply to the
industrial plant may be used as the liquid quantity, where it is
substantiated that the metered water supply and waste quantities are
approximately the same, or where a measurable adjustment can be made in
the metered supply to determine the liquid quantity.
(e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly refrigerated and
composited in proportion to the flow for a representative twenty-four
(24)hours sample. For oil and grease, pH, phenols, cyanide, volatile
toxic organic and other appropriate pollutants, property grab sampling
shall be performed. Each sampling shall be repeated on as many days as
necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire reporting
period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in quantities of
wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced automatically by the
flow-measuring device.
(f) Minimum requirements for representative quantities under this
section shall include re-evaluation during each twelve (12) month
period. The determination of representative quantities shall include not
less than seven (7) consecutive days of twenty-four (24) hour composite
samplings, taken during periods of normal operation, together with
acceptable flow measurements. The frequency of sampling, sampling
chamber, metering device, sampling methods and analyses of samples shall
be subject, at any time, to inspection and verification by the County.
Sampling and measuring facilities shall be such as to provide safe
access for authorized personnel of the County for making such inspection:
and verification.
24
~~
(g) Plans for sampling chambers, with their locations shown on a
site plan, shall be submitted to the County for approval.
(h) All owners of facilities governed by this section shall also
comply with any applicable Monitoring Requirements and Regulations
established by the approving authority which are hereby incorporated by
reference.
(i) All owners of facilities governed by this article shall comply
with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12 as amended, which
is incorporated by reference herein, including, without limitation, the
signatory, certification and record keeping requirements of 40 C.F.R.
403.12 (c),(d), (i), and (1). All records shall be retained for a
minimum of three years and this retention period shall be extended
during litigation or upon request of the approving authority.
1.1.L Sampling for discharge limit compliance shall be taken at the
sampling chamber without any dilution factor except for proAerly
classified categorical or significant users.
~_ Sampling for prohibited materials may be collected at either
the sampling chamber or end of process to determine the absence of the
prohibited material.
Sec. 18-164. Discharge permits for industrial waste.
~ ~
~Z~t~eica-arr-t-~i39 e~~~ei~~3~6i~~e~--t-~i~~te _..,a__.'~_ j.:
,., ~ . , ~..,.. ; } .. ,,..,, i ; ,-... } ; ,.,., ; ~ t, ; ...
•~1~-----#O~l~equ~~r~p-l~e~~ea~t-ale:..., ......__.._-- --- --rr--------- -•------- ----
25
~- 3
-~2-T~~eg~t ~~g-p-i~~e at~e~t ; eu~-ids-a--pe~~--a~g3~ea~e~= -gin
o~~~~~ed--a-i-g3 88-}-dates a~€~
4ri~~6 ^~ c1~Ffl=~3~~-~3~~9~s-~T@~
,
e-tg'~-~1~~--~y-j-r~e~~e-a~~e;aa-~e~t~i~e-r~rt i~-a~3-~~
des ee~tp~-red-wit-~i-e~eq~~eme~s~e= ---- ---- ----- ~ - r "----- -
, ,
~. iuvi
-F~~~e~rdes ~' i-erg-~ei~t s~~-ee~e-fir ..~.,..~ .,~ ....~..
-{-~}-E-emp~-res-~i t~-~e-~eg~ri~eme~s e~-€e~i~aa _ ~'- ~ ~ ~ = - - ~ ,
st-a-~a-r~s~re~e-a~p~e~a~~-~i-~e~~i~~-t~~ev~e~e~g~t:~} ~ an;
~ti., , ,. ~.~ ; .., .,
(a) It shall be unlawful for any significant industrial user or
other user as determined by the approving authority to discharge
industrial waste into the public sanitary sewer system unless an
appropriate Industrial Discharge Permit has been issued by the approving
authority. In order to obtain an Industrial Discharge Permit, such
26
Z3
person shall.
,~ Submit a complete application at least ninety (90) days
rior to the date proposed .for initial discharae on forms
supplied by the approving authority. The approving
authori~ will act upon the application within sixty (60)
days.
L~ Comply with all requirements for the discharge Qermit
including but not limited to, provisions for payment of
charges installation and operation of pretreatment
facilities and sampling and analysis to determine
quantity and strength.
~, Provide a sampling point subject to the provisions of
this article and approval of the approving authority.
S~ Comply with the requirements of federal categorical
standards where applicable, including the development of
any required compliance schedules or the applicable
provisions of this article.
(b) An industrial user applying for a new discharge shall meet all
conditions of subsection (a) of this section and shall secure a permit
prior to discharging any waste.
(c) A person not applying for a discharge permit within the
allotted time and continuing to discharge an unpermitted discharge shall
be deemed to be in violation of this article.
(d) A permit issued under this section shall be valid for up to
five (5) years from its date of issuance, after which time the
industrial user shall be required to obtain a new discharge permit.
27
'~~~
(e) The approving authority shall have the right to accept or
reject any increases in flow or pollutants under existing or new
permits.
sec. 18-165. Waiver or modification of requirements of article.
The approving authority shall have the right to waive or modify, on
an interim basis to be noted in any permit issued under this article,
the requirements of this article as they pertain to strength of
contaminants. No such waiver or modification shall be granted contrary
to any County, state or federal regulation and no waiver or modification.
shall be granted, if it would result in the violation of the discharge
permit for the plant, as it is now issued or as such permit may be
amended.
Sec. 18-166. Charged generally.
Persons making discharges of industrial waste shall pay a charge to
cover the cost of collection and treatment in addition to capital costs.
When a permit application for industrial waste is approved, the County
or its authorized representative shall issue a permit stating:
(a) The terms of acceptance by the County; and
(b) The basis of payment.
Sec. 18-167. User charges and added costs.
(a) If the volume or character of the waste to be treated by the
plant meets the requirements of other provisions of this article and
does not cause overloading of the sewage collection, treatment or
disposal facilities of the County, the approving authority shall require
that the discharger pay a charge to be determined from the schedule of
charges which shall include capital costs.
28
(b) If a proposed discharge of waste is responsible for exceeding
the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities and the
wastewater treatment plant must be upgraded, expanded or enlarged in
order to treat the wastewater, the approving authority shall require
that the discharger pay in full all added costs which shall include
capital costs the County may incur due to acceptance of the wastewater.
(c) The schedule of charges pursuant to subsection (a) of this
section shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) Capital costs, including debt retirement and interest on
debt, of the County's cost on all capital outlays for
collecting and treating the waste, including new capital
outlay and the proportionate part of the value of the
existing system used in handling and treating waste.
(2) Operation and maintenance costs (capitalized), including
but not limited to, salaries and wages, power costs,
costs of chemicals and supplies, proper allowances for
maintenance, depreciation, overhead and office expense.
Sec. 18-168. Schedule of charges.
(a) Persons discharging wastewater shall pay a charge to cover the
capital cost and the cost of collection and treatment of all wastewater
discharged.
(1) All Class I users discharging normal wastewater or Group
B wastewater shall pay a user charge computed upon cost
per volume of wastewater discharged.
(2) All Class II users discharging Group A wastewater shall
have their user charge computed upon a cost per unit
29
~- 3
volume basis for the amount plus the unit cost of
treatment for all over the base amount for volume,
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (SS),
phosphorus (P) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). In
computing the contaminant loading, the parameter
concentrations for normal wastewater will be considered
as standard strength in determining the base amount in
the effluent discharge flow.
Initially, the responsibility for determining the contaminant
loading for each category of establishment will be that of the approving
authority. However, each establishment must verify its own contaminant
loading monthly by initiating a sampling and analytical program at its
own expense and with the approval of the approving authority.
(b) The units costs to be used to compute the charge for Class I
and II users shall be established by the approving authority. The unit
costs for all users and the allowances for normal wastewater for users
may be revised as necessary to correspond to current costs and
experience. Revisions may be made, no more often than once a year, upon
approval of the approving authority. The user charge for users shall be
computed as follows:
Class I Users: Cu = Vu x Vd
Class II Users:
Cs = Vu x Vd + VSVc + BSBc + SSSc + PSPc + NSNc
And:
Cu Charge for Class I users
30
~3
Cs = Charge for Class II users
Vu = Unit cost of treatment chargeable to normal wastewater ($/1,000
gal.)
Vd = Volume of wastewater from normal wastewater (1,000 gals.)
Vs = Volume of Class II wastewater (1,000 gals.) in excess of Class I
wastewater
V
= Cost of treating 1,000 gals. of Class II wastewater ($/1,000 gal.)
c
-~
~
~ i~ i~--
-
~b~s
B e~a
~
= Class {
~
II wastewater BOD contribution in excess of Class I
-s
wastewater limit (lbs.)
B = Cost of treating Class II BOD contribution ($/lb.)
c
S = Class II wastewater SS contribution in excess of Class I wastewater
s
limit (lbs.)
S = Cost of treating Class II SS contribution ($/lb.)
c
~= C-est e~t~ea~g-E-l-ass-i~-glre sp~re~ts ~eb~e~--~~1~-3-
Ps = Class II wastewater phosphorus contribution in excess of Class I
wastewater limit (lbs.~
Ns = Class II wastewater unoxidized nitrogen contribution in excess of
Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Nc = Cost of treating Class II nitrogen contribution ($/lb.)
Sec. 18-169. Adjustment of charges.
(a) The county may adjust charges at least annually to reflect
changes in the characteristics of wastewater based on the results of
sampling and testing. This adjustment will correspond to charges
established by the operating authority for the treatment plant.
31
~`
(b) The county shall review at least annually the basis for
determining charges and shall adjust the unit treatment cost in the
formula to reflect increases or decreases in wastewater treatment costs
based on the previous year's experience.
Sec. 18-170. Billing and payment of charges.
(a) The county may bill the discharger by the month or by the
quarter and shall show waste charges as a separate item on the regular
bill for water and sewer charges. The discharger shall pay in
accordance with practices existing for payment of sewer charges.
(b) In addition to sanctions provided for by this article, the
County is entitled to exercise sanctions provided for by the other
ordinances of the County for failure to pay the bill for water and
sanitary sewer service when due.
Sec. 18-171. Right of entry to enforce article.
(a) The approving authority and other duly authorized employees of
the County bearing proper credentials and identification shall be
authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable
time for the purpose of enforcing this article for sampling purposes,
inspect monitoring equipment and to inspect and copy all documents
relevant to the enforcement of this article, including, without
limitation, monitoring reports. Anyone acting under this authority
shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning
safety, internal security, and fire protection.
~e~s~ e~da~age-fie ids-p-r~e- e~~e~ees~~-a~g~i~rsrt_ _~'~ _' _},•
32
13
~..~ ~ ..l
uZ""i.ZT. =eT
Appropriate information submitted to the approving authority
pursuant to these regulations excluding any information utilized in
determining effluent limits may be claimed as confidential by the
submitter at the time of submission by stampinct the words "confidential
business information" on each page containing such information. If a
claim is asserted the information shall be treated in accordance with
applicable law.
(c) No person acting under authority of this section may inquire
into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining,
ceramic, paper or other industries, beyond that point having a direct
bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the public sewers.
dQ-te-~i-~-i~rg-e~€~~~~.--aim' e-e-l-a-iced-a~s ~e~de~~-bye
Sec. 18-172. Authority to disconnect service.
(a) The county reserves the right to terminate water and
wastewater disposal services and disconnect a customer from the system
and revoke any discharge permit issued under this article when:
(1) Acids or chemicals damaging to sewer lines or treatment
33
~`
process are released into the sewer causing rapid
deterioration of these structures or interfering with
proper conveyance and treatment of wastewater;
(2) A governmental agency informs the County that the
effluent from the wastewater treatment plant is no longer
a quality permitted for discharge into a watercourse, and
it is found that the customer is delivering wastewater to
the County's system that cannot be sufficiently treated
or requires treatment that is not provided by the County
as normal domestic treatment; or
(3) The customer:
a. Discharges industrial waste or wastewater that is in
violation of the permit issued by the approving
authority;
b. Discharges wastewater at an uncontrolled, variable
rate in sufficient quantity to cause an imbalance in the
wastewater treatment system;
c. Fails to pay bills for water and sanitary sewer
services when due; or
d. Repeats a discharge of prohibited wastes into public
sewers.
(4) The permittee has engaged in fraudulent reporting to the
approval authority or failed to report adequately as
required changes in discharge.
(b) If the service is disconnected pursuant to subsection (a) (2)
of this section, the County shall:
34
7- 3
(1) Disconnect the customer;
(2) Supply the customer with the governmental agency's report
and provide the customer with all pertinent information;
and
(3) Continue disconnection until such time as the customer
provides additional pretreatment or other facilities
designed to remove the objectionable characteristics from
this wastes.
Sec. 18-173. Notice of violations
The county shall serve persons discharging in violation of this
article with written notice stating the nature of the violation and
requiring immediate satisfactory compliance.
The approving authority shall have the authority to publish
annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or a newspaper of
general circulation in the Roanoke area a list of persons which were not
in compliance with the terms of this Article at least once during the
twelve (12) previous months.
Sec. 18-174. Penalty for violations.
(a) A person who violates the provisions of this article shall be
guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable by a
fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation per day and
confinement in jail for not more than twelve months, either or both. In
the event of a violation, the approving authority shall also have the
right to terminate the sewer and water connection.
(b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-section (a)
of this section, the County is entitled to pursue all other criminal and
35
1 '~
civil remedies to which it is entitled under authority of state statues
or other ordinances of the County against a person continuing prohibited
discharges, including, without limitation, injunctive relief.
~_ Any person who knowingly makes any false statements,
representations or certifications in any application, record, report,
plan or other document files required to be maintained pursuant to this
ordinance, or wastewater permit, or who falsifies, tampers with or
knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required
under this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be punishable by a fine of
51,000.00 per violation, per dav, or imprisonment for not more than one
ear, or both.
~_ The approving authority shall be authorized to implement such
other program and enforcement mechanisms as are consistent with
regulatory guidelines and are deemed appropriate.
Sec. 18-175. Payment of costs for work required by prohibited
deposits.
In any case where a sewer main or pipe connection is stopped,
damaged or choked by any materials or rubbish being deposited therein
contrary to the provisions of this article, by any tenant or property
owner, upon due ascertainment by the County Administrator, he shall
cause the main pipe connection or manhole to be opened, cleaned,
replaced or repaired, and shall cause the cost for doing such work to be
collected from the property owner. The payment of such cost shall not
relieve any person from prosecution for a violation of this article.
S@C. 18-176. Pub11C aCC@33 tO data.
Effluent data complied as part of the approving authority's
pretreatment program shall be available to the public.
2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after December 1, 1991.
c:\wp5]\agenda\code\sewet2
36
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Court-Community Corrections Policy Board
Three-year term of Harry C. Nickens will expire December 31,
1991. Supervisor Nickens has indicated his willingness to
serve another term on this Board.
2. Grievance Panel
Three-year term of alternate Cecil Hill expired October 12, 1991.
Mr. Hill has been appointed as a regular member of the panel.
3. Librarv Board
Four-year terms of Jane Bryant, Catawba Magisterial District and
Dr. Paul M. Zeis, Windsor Hills Magisterial District will expire
December 31, 1991.
4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of
Directors
Three-year term of Rita J. Gliniecki will expire December 31,
1991. Ms. Gliniecki is eligible for reappointment. Please see
attached letter.
5. Planning Commission
Four-year term of Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring Magisterial
District will expire December 31, 1991.
6. Social Services Board
Four-year term of William P. Broderick will expire January 1,
1992. Mr. Broderick has served two terms and is not eligible for
reappointment.
~~
SUBMITTED BY: APPR VED BY•
~ ~ .~ ~~.
Mary H. lien Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Motion by:
ACTION
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
', ~'
i-.
~, ` i~ ,
~~ ~ -
~.
,,,
Chairman
John M. Hudgins, Jr.
Vice Chairman
Henry J. Sullivan, Ph.D
Treasurer
Daniel E. Karnes
Secretary
Rita J. Gliniecki
E,tecutiue Director
Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D.
November 7, 1991
Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 298P1P1
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mr. McGraw:
~°~
According to our records, Mrs. Rita J.
Gliniecki's term of appointment to Mental Health
Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors
by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors expires
December 31, 1991. Our records also indicate
that Mrs. Gliniecki is eligible for consideration
for appointment to another three-year term in com-
pliance with Virginia Statutes regulating
appointments to our Board.
Your attention to this matter will be very
much appreciated.
S' cerely,
Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D.
Executive Director
FPRjr:cd
C: Elmer C.
Mary H.
John M.
Rita J.
Hodge
Allen
Hudgins, Jr.
Gliniecki
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOICE VALLEY -Executive Offices
301 Elm Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24015-4026 - (703) 345-9841 FAX (703) 342-3855
Serving the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke
~~ ~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT
AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for November 19, 1991, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 5, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - October 8, 1991, October 17,
1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991
2. Ratification of inactive status of Health
Department Board of Directors.
3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles
by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read
Mountain Fire Station.
4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in
connection with the Roanoke River~Interceptor Phase
III Project.
5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd
and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove
Road Drainage Project.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
f
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION 111991-14 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET
FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for November 19, 1991, designated as Item K -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 5, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - October 8, 1991, October 17,
1991, October 22, 1991, October 23, 1991
2. Ratification of inactive status of Health
Department Board of Directors.
3. Request to increase number of authorized vehicles
by the retention of a vehicle for use by the Read
Mountain Fire Station.
4. Donation of sanitary sewer and water easements in
connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase
III Project.
5. Donation of drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd
and Lois Ann Boyd in connection with Carvins Cove
Road Drainage Project.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
:x
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Health Department Board of Directors File
~-,
October 8, 1991
;~-
~.
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
October 8, 1991
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration
Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly
scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1991.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:14 p.m. The
roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PREBENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry
C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L.
Johnson, Richard W. Robers
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
8TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk
to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County
Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant
County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant
County Administrator, Anne Marie Green,
Information Officer
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Kenneth Stofft, Our
Lady of Nazareth Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by
October 8, 1991
~ l/ •J
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to NEDRA
W. CROCRETT for fourteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated
service to Roanoke County.
FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its
best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
b. Iris S. Groft
R-10891-1.b
Ms. Groff was present and also received a savings bond and
plaque recognizing over 25 years of service. Supervisor Robers
moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
RESOLIITION 10891-1.b E%PRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY TO IRIS 8. GROFF
FOR TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COIINTY
WHEREAS, Iris S. Groff was first employed in July,
1966, as a Social Worker in the Department of Social Services;
and
c
October 8, 1991
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
RESOLIITION 10891-i.c E%PRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY TO RONALD R.
HENDERBON, SR. FOR THIRTY-TWO YEARS OF SERVICES TO
ROANORE COIINTY
WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr. was first employed
in May, 1959 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and
WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr. has also served as
Lieutenant and Captain in the Sheriff's Office; and
WHEREAS, Ronald R. Henderson, Sr., through his
employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in
improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to RONALD
R. HENDERSON, SR. for thirty-two years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its
best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
October 8, 1991
"" .~ ..
3
life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses it deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROGER
D. HIIFFMAN for twenty three years of capable, loyal and dedicated
service to Roanoke County.
FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its
best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
2. Resolution of Aooreciation to Magnetic Bearings,
Incorporated for locating in Roanoke County.
R-10891-2
Representatives from Magnetic Bearings were present to
receive the resolution. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the
resolution. The motion was carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
RESOLIITION 10891-2 OF APPRECIATION TO MAGNETIC
BEARINGS, INC. (MBI) FOR LOCATING IN ROANORE COIINTY
WHEREAS, MBI conducted a search to relocate its 37
employees and expand its facilities in the Roanoke Valley from
Radford; and
,,
October 8, 1991
A-10891-3
There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to
approve the Public-Private Partnership request. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
2. Discussion of proposed 1991-92 Legislative Program
County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that items on the
proposed legislative program requests came from individual Board
members, other localities and the Employee Advisory Committee.
He reported that the VACo/VML joint annexation task force is
still studying this legislative request, and that the County
Attorney's office will monitor this and the reallocation of state
funding of education for equity. There was discussion on some
requests as to whether these should be addressed through a
charter amendment or general legislation. Mr. Mahoney advised
that a public hearing must be held for charter amendments and
that a patron must sponsor general legislation in the General
Assembly.
Chairman McGraw asked Mr. Mahoney to bring back a
prioritized list of legislative requests to the October 22, 1991
meeting.
3. Reconsideration of 301 Gilmer Associates Rezonin
Re uest.
At the request of the attorney for the petitioner,
Supervisor Johnson moved to reconsider the issue. He asked staff
October 8, 1991
i
ordinance. They were not necessarily opposed to the ordinance
but requested involvement in preparation.
1. Seth P. Oginz, Security Consultants Unlimited, 4333 Old
Cave Spring Road.
2. Hugh Preston, Affiliated Electronics Corporation, 2112
Shenandoah Avenue.
3. Doug Mathena, Alarmtronics Company, 542 Parkdale Drive,
Salem.
4. D. Martin Etzler, Jr., 4040 Franklin Road
5. Connie Higginbotham, Route 4, Box 1450, Rocky Mount, Va.
Supervisor Robers moved that the item be deferred to allow
for input from the alarm industry. Mr. Hodge asked that the
Board approve the first reading of the ordinance and that the
staff will meet with the alarm industry and bring back more
information for the second reading.
Supervisor Robers amended his motion to approve first
reading and that staff meet with the industry and set a work
session if necessary prior to the second reading of the
ordinance. Supervisor Nickens asked that the second reading
include verification of which firms had been contacted for input.
The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance acce tin an offer for and authorizin
E
October 8, 1991
~'
°~
1-17; and
3. That an offer having been received for said property,
the offer of Dennis L. Humston to purchase this property of Nine
Thousand Dollars ($9,000.00) is hereby accepted; and
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are
to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund pursuant to Section
16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property,
all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
1. Industrial Development Authority
Supervisor Nickens nominated Wayne Dunman to a four year
term expiring September 26, 1995 upon recommendation of the
Vinton Town Council.
2. Planninc Commission
Supervisor Johnson nominated Ronald Massey to another four-
year term that will expire December 31, 1995.
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
October 8, 1991
f n ~
i
with Item 4 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
IN RE: REQUEST FROM SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD FOR SUPPORT IN
OPPOSITION TO AMENDMENTS TO THE CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT LAW
Several Board members asked for more information on this
issue which would exclude local school personnel from being
investigated by Social Services agencies for allegations of child
abuse and neglect.
Supervisor Eddy moved to defer this item to gather further
information including input from the Schools and staff. There
was no vote. Supervisor Robers offered a substitute motion to
bring back the issue on October 22, 1991 with additional input
from the school administration and staff. The motion was carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIEB OF BOARD MEMBERS
8unervisor Eddv: (1) Announced he had attended Congressman
Jim Olin's seminar on affordable housing. He requested a report
from the Planning staff on Roanoke County's effort to provide
affordable housing. The Board members suggested that Supervisor
Eddy meet with the Planning Director instead. (2) Asked for
more information on the Spring Hollow bid timeframe. Mr. Hodge
t
V
October 8, 1991
IN RE: WORK SESSION
1. Joint Work Session with Appalachian Power
Officials - APCO Transmission Line
Mr. Hodge introduced officials from Appalachian Power
Company. They included Charles A. Simmons, Vice President,
Construction and Maintenance and Dr. Leonard J. Simutis, Study
Team consultant.
Mr. Simmons provided an overview of the APCO and American
Electric Power study which was undertaken by a study team from
West Virginia University and VPI&SU who recommended a preferred
corridor and an alternate corridor for the 765 kv line. The
proposed line will cross Roanoke County in the Catawba area. He
advised that SCC will hold public hearings on April 2, 1992 in
New Castle, Virginia and on April 6, 1992 in Richmond regarding
the preferred and alternate corridors. Dr. Simutis reported that
the study team studied 26 different routes and the team paid
particular attention to residences and the potential scenic
impact to the Jefferson National Forest and the Appalachian
Trail. They were also mandated to parallel existing transmission
lines whenever possible. He advised there were only 17 homes in
Virginia within 500 feet of the preferred corridor.
Mr. Hodge advised that the staff would continue to work with
the citizens in the affected area, with Appalachian Power
officials, and will keep the board informed. Supervisor McGraw
asked that the Board of Supervisors be provided with a list of
residences that would be impacted by the transmission line.
October 8, 1991
~ ~
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that,
to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were
heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Eddy
IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT
October 17, 1991
.~ n ~„
~. ,+
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
October 17, 1991
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration
Center, this being an adjourned meeting from Tuesday, October 8,
1991 for the purpose of accepting bids for the General Obligation
and Water Revenue Bonds for the Spring Hollow Reservoir.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:11 p.m. The
roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry
C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L.
Johnson, Richard W. Robers
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk
to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County
Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant
County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant
County Administrator, Anne Marie Green,
Information Officer
IN RE: INVOCATION
October 17, 1991
.7 r
~_ ,;
1. Acceptance of Sale of S15 million General Obligation
Bonds.
R-101791-1
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared resolution
accepting the sale of $15 million General Obligation Bonds.
Supervisor Eddy presented the following comments that he
requested be included in the minutes.
"Mr. Chairman, I am pleased that the bond interest rates
appear to be so attractive. I am also pleased that the combined
amount of the bond issue has been moderately reduced from that
previously estimated as a result of the low interest rates and the
favorable construction bids received on the reservoir portion of
the project. I think most of the teams involved in developing the
financing package have performed very well, and are to be
commended. However, I plan to vote against the resolutions
ratifying the terms of the bond sales for the following reasons:
1. I have previously opposed the Spring Hollow Project
and the bond issues, and I intend to act in a consistent manner.
2. The Spring Hollow Project has a very high cost-to-
benefit ratio.
3. In my opinion, alternate sources and arrangements
have not been evaluated to a sufficient degree to demonstrate,
without question, that the Spring Hollow Project financed entirely
by Roanoke County is the best solution to the Roanoke Valley's
water needs in the foreseeable future.
4. The County is approaching the overall project on a
October 17, 1991
`~ +.` f
Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1991 ("Bond Purchase
Agreement") with Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated, Craigie
Incorporated, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Scott & Stringfellow
Investment Corp. ("Underwriters").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. Ratification of Terms. The issuance and sale of
theBonds upon the terms and conditions set forth in the
BondPurchase Agreement are approved and ratified.
2. Ratification of Preliminary Official Statement;
Execution of Official Statement. The Preliminary Official
Statement is deemed final as of its date except for the omissionof
certain Information such as offering prices, interest rates,
selling compensation and other information permitted by Rule 15c-
2-12 (b) of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Chairman
of the Board is authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Official Statement with respect to the issuance and sale of the
Bonds in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official
Statement with such changes that are not inconsistent with Rule
15c-2-12 as such officer may consider necessary or desirable in
connection therewith and such Official Statement is
hereby approved.
3. ADUrOVal and Execution of Bond Purchase Agreement
The Bond Purchase Agreement is approved in substantially the form
submitted at this meeting, with such changes, insertions or
omissions as may be approved by the Chairman of the Board or the
October 17, 1991
~ v ~j
R-101791-2
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution
accepting the sale of $59,731,874 Water Revenue Bonds. The motion
was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: Supervisor Eddy
REBOLIITION 10791-2 OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS
OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA WITH RESPECT
TO WATER SYSTEM REVENIIE BONDB, SERIES 1991
The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a Resolution on August 27,
1991 ("Resolution"), authorizing the issuance and sale of the
County's Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 1991 ("Bonds"). The
Bonds will be issued pursuant to the following documents:
(i) Master Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1991,
between the County and Crestar Bank, as Trustee ("Trustee"); (ii)
First Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of
October 1, 1991, between the County and the Trustee;
(iii) Preliminary official Statement with respect to the sale
of the Bonds, dated October 4, 1991; and
(iv) Bond Purchase Agreement, dated October 17, 1991 ("Bond
Purchase Agreement") among the County and Alex. Brown & Sons,
Incorporated, Craigie Incorporated, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Scott
& Stringfellow Investment Corp., as Underwriters
("Underwriters"). All of the documents listed above, except the
Preliminary
Official Statement, are referred to in this Resolution as the
October 17, 1991
Documents. The execution and delivery of and performance by the
County of the Basic Documents are authorized.
4. Ratification of Escrow Agreement The County has
defeased the outstanding principal amount of its $960,000 Water
System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("VRA Bond") pursuant to the
Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1991 ("Escrow
Agreement") among the County, Crestar Bank, as Escrow Agent and
the Virginia Resources Authority. The execution and delivery of
the Escrow Agreement and all actions in connection with the
defeasance of the VRA Bond taken or required to be taken by the
County Administrator, and such officers and agents of the County
as he may designate, are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed.
5. Further Actions. The County Administrator, and such
officers and agents of the County as he may designate, are
authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such
instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform
such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate
to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or
contemplated by the Bonds, the Escrow Agreement and the Basic
Documents; and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed
by such officers or agents of the County, are in all respects
approved, ratified and confirmed.
6. Filing of Resolution The County Attorney is
authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution
with the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia pursuant
to Sections 15.1-227.9 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
October 17, 1991
1~,~
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in
the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were
heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
IN REt ADJOIIRNMENT
At 5:04 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
.~
' {.< <J
October 22, 1991
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
October 22, 1991
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration
Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly
scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1991.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:11 p.m. The
roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry
C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L.
Johnson (arrived at 3:35 p.m.), Richard W.
Robers
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
8TAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk
to the Board; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County
Administrator, John M. Chambliss, Assistant
County Administrator, Don M. Myers, Assistant
County Administrator, Anne Marie Green,
Information Officer
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
October 22, 1991
~ +~
local subcontractors.
IN RE: NEW BIISINE88
1. Rewest for authorization to award construction
contract for spring Hollow Reservoir.
A-102291-1
Supervisors Johnson, Robers and McGraw spoke in strong support
for the reservoir project. Supervisor Eddy announced he would vote
in opposition.
Supervisor Nickens moved to award the contract to PCL from
Tempe, Arizona. The motion was carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
Following the award, Chairman McGraw and Mr. Lord participated
in a signing ceremony.
2. Revuest from Social Services Department to accept
and a~Dro~riate Childcare and Development Block
Grant.
A-102291-2
Social Services Director Betty Lucas reported that this grant
would increase the availability, affordability and quality of child
care for low-income families who are not on welfare assistance and
enable them to continue working or attending education and training
programs. The grant is $41,270.00 and is 100 percent reimbursable,
but requires "up front" monies.
October 22, 1991
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson
NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, McGraw
4. Aooroval of 1991-92 Legislative Program
R-102291-4
Mr. Mahoney reported that at the October 8 meeting the Board
discussed the proposed legislative program and directed that he
bring back the program for approval with any additional comments
from the Board members.
Supervisor Nickens suggested that the request regarding funds
for law enforcement expenditures (Item 2.a) should be included as
a charter amendment. Supervisor Johnson suggested including it in
both general legislation and charter amendments.
Supervisor Eddy asked for support for his requests that
included limiting courts in rezoning decisions and a local tax on
bingo profits. Mr. Mahoney responded that there was no legislator
willing to sponsor the rezoning legislation. Following other
discussion, there was no consensus to add Supervisor's Eddy's
requests to the program.
Supervisors Nickens and Johnson questioned the enforceability
of the request that would allow the County to regulate the sounds
of train bells and suggested that this issue be discussed with the
railroad (Item 3.b).
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the legislative program
with Item 3.B removed and Item 2.A included in both general
legislative requests and charter amendment legislation. The motion
October 22, 1991
A + ,
a. Amend § 2.02 to increase the authority of the County
to levy and collect taxes on hotel and motel rooms from 2$ to 4$.
b. Amend § 2.02 to authorize the County to impose a tax
upon the sale or use of cigarettes or other tobacco products.
c. Amend § 12.04 to authorize the Roanoke County School
Board to set the school calendar and establish an earlier date for
the opening of the school year and relieve the County from the
post-Labor Day opening day requirement.
d. Amend Chapter 5, Administrative Departments, by the
addition of § 5.02 to provide for law enforcement funding by
establishing a distribution of funds for law enforcement
expenditures in an amount not less than the amount of expenditures
to the county by the State Compensation Board for law enforcement
purposes.
2. That the general laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia be
amended as follows:
a. Amend Article 10 of Title 14.1 to establish a
distribution of funds for law enforcement expenditures for counties
establishing a police force pursuant to referendum in an amount not
less than the amount of expenditures to that county by the State
Compensation Board for law enforcement purposes.
b. Amend general law to provide for a beverage
container deposit.
c. Repeal the Dillon Rule.
d. Amend § 59.1-274 to increase the number of
enterprise zones. The General Assembly is requested to authorize
October 22, 1991
i4 h
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
5. Reovest from School Board for acceptance of grants
totalinc 5180,000 for vocational education programs.
A-102291-5
Garland Kidd, Director of Vocational and Adult Education was
present to answer questions. Supervisor Johnson moved to accept
the grants. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
6. ReQUest for 5350,000 allocation from year end
surplus for meritorious bonuses for all county
employees
Supervisor Johnson asked that a portion of the year-end
surplus be allocated to fund a bonus for all county and school
employees in recognition of their contributions since the County
did not fund salary increases this year. Budget Director Reta
Busher advised that a $100 bonus for 2500 employees would cost
$375,000.
Mr. Hodge responded that he would prefer that the year-
end surplus be set aside in a special account to fund salaries in
the 1992-93 budget.
Supervisor McGraw asked that the staff bring back a list
of alternatives including employee bonuses, future salary increases
October 22, 1991
F
Planning Commission.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
i. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a
portion of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant
property, to the Valley Soccer Club.
Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Carpenter presented
the staff report advising that the Soccer Club will be responsible
for maintaining the property and that improvements will revert back
to the County upon termination of the 10 year renewable lease. He
reported that the County will be able to use the fields at no
charge when not in conflict with Valley Soccer Club activities.
In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy, Mr.
Mahoney advised the lease will be available for review at the
second reading on November 19.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading. The
motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amendinct the Roanoke County Code by the
addition of Article VIII "Fire and Securit Alarms"
to Chapter 16 "Police" to regulate the use and
aeration of security and fire alarm systems
(CONTINIIED TO NOVEMBER 19, 1991)
October 22, 1991
M
.:
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - September 10, 1991,
September 24, 1991.
2 Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Court-Community Corrections Policy Board, the
Industrial Development Authority and the
Planning Commission.
3. Request for acceptance of Strathmore Lane and
Cardington Drive into the Virginia Department
of Transportation Secondary System.
4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer
facilities serving Bentley Park Subdivision.
5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer
facilities serving Hollins Court.
6. Approval of Raffle Permit for Cave Spring
District Lions Club.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
on motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve with Item
5 removed for separate vote, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve Item No.
5, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
October 22, 1991
,, r
~l
~ ~
Cardington Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch
accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary
System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after
notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by
the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
supervisor Eddv• (1) Asked who will be attending the
Virginia Association of Counties annual conference. He was
informed that Chairman McGraw will be attending at VACo's expense
because he is president of the organization. Others attending
include Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Hodge, Mr. Mahoney and Public
Information Officer Anne Marie Green. (2) Asked about a report
on enforcement of the weed ordinance. Mr. Hodge responded that he
will bring back a report on December 17.
Supervisor Nickens: (1) Asked for report regarding
Roanoke County's contributions encouraging tourism in the Roanoke
Valley.
Supervisor Johnson• (1) Asked when the audit report
would be ready. Mr. Hodge responded that he will have the report
for the November 19, 1991 meeting and will also schedule an Audit
October 22, 1991
75~
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7)
for legal consultation regarding the landfill contract and the
Fralin & Waldron court case (Too-Tall Building), and (1) to discuss
a personnel matter regarding appointments to the Library Board.
The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECUTIVE SESSION
R-102291-7
At 5:55 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to Open
Session and adopt the certification resolution. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 102291=7 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
October 22, 1991
IN RE: PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation declarinc the week of November 3
through 9, 1991 as Royal Ambassador Week.
Dave Simmons with the Royal Ambassadors was present to
receive the proclamation and introduced the youths who were
involved in the program. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the
proclamation. The motion was carried by a unanimous voice vote
with Supervisor Nickens absent.
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS
1091-1 Recuest for a Special Exception Permit from
valley Soccer Club. Inc. to construct
recreational soccer fields on a 14.51 acre
tract located at 6661 Merriman Road Cave
Spring Macisterial District.
A-102291-8
Planning and Zoning Director Terry Harrington presented
the staff report. He advised that the property is owned by the
County and was the location of the Starkey Road sewer lagoon. It
is currently zoned M-1 Light Industrial and recreational uses are
permitted with a Special Exception Permit. He reported that the
property is in a floodplain and FEMA requirements will have to be
met, and that the petitioner has received approval for a variance
for the paving requirements.
Rachel Wilkerson, who lives on Merriman Road, was
concerned about whether the fields will be lighted in the future.
y ~ n
,'~ .~
October 22, 1991
i
Caretaker mobile homes are not permitted in any zoning district and
the application is for uses not provided in the zoning ordinance.
Supervisor McGraw moved to grant the Use Not Provided for
Permit. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, McGraw.
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 102291-9 AIITHORIZING A IISE-NOT-
PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ALLOW A CARETAKER'S
MOBILE HOME IN THE CAMPGROIIND LOCATED AT 5753
WEST MAIN STREET, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
IIPON THE APPLICATION OF DIBIE CAVERNS ~ POTTERY
INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
September 24, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was
held October 22, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided
as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a use-not-provided-for permit allowing a
caretaker's mobile home in the campground (a portion of Tax Map
Number 63.04-1-1) located at 5753 West Main Street in the Catawba
Magisterial District is hereby authorized.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of
Dixie caverns ~ Pottery Inc.
October 22, 1991
~ 1
r ~
Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr.
0-102291-10
Mr. Harrington explained that Mr. Hubbard plans to
operate a 24-hour taxi-cab business from the site. The area is in
a Transition Land Use category, and the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the request 4 - 1.
Supervisor Eddy asked if there was any limit to the
number of taxis that Mr. Hubbard can operate, and Mr. Harrington
responded there is nothing in the conditions that would limit the
number.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the request. The
motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson McGraw.
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 102291-10 TO AMEND PROFFERED
CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 0.685-ACRE
TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4909 COVE ROAD
(TAB MAP NO. 37.17-1-5) IN THE CATAWHA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF M-1, LIGHT INDIISTRIAL
DISTRICT, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-
1, LIGHT INDIISTRIAL DISTRICT/CONDITIONAL
(AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) AND AIITHORIZING A IISE-
NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE A TABI
SERVICE IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THOMAS R.
HIIBBARD JR.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
September 24, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing
was held October 22, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a
October 22, 1991
(a) No outside storage of materials.
(b) Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the
building.
(c) Plant new shrubs in front of the
building.
(d) The property will be used primarily for the
sale of heating and air conditioning systems
and guttering and related components, and for
the inside storage and fabrication of
materials incidental to such sales and for
office, administrative and other purposes
reasonably related to the activities above-
described. Also this Droperty will be used to
operate a taxi cab service.
(e) The total area of all business signs on the
property will not at any one time exceed the
sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot
of street frontage and in no event more than
300 square feet, regardless of the number of
lineal feet of street frontage.
L,L The storage of motor fuels in bulk, either above or
below around, shall be prohibited.
All other proffers and conditions would remain in full
force.
5. That said real estate is more fully described as
follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake on the northwesterly
right-of-way line of Peters Creek Road, Virginia
Highway Route 117, 146.29 feet northeasterly from
an angle point at the northwesterly corner of
Peters Creek Road and Cove Road, said beginning
point being the northeasterly corner of the
property of Humble Oil Co.; thence leaving Peters
Creek Road and with two lines of the Humble Oil Co.
property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 100.0 feet to an iron
stake; thence S. 34 deg. 28' 30" W. 165.00 feet to
an iron stake on the northerly right-of-way line of
Cove Road (Virginia Highway No. 116); thence with
same, leaving the Humble Oil Co. property N. 74
deg. 21' W. 113.00 feet to an iron stake, a corner
to the property of Mrs. Dorothy H. Whitesell, Mrs.
Geraldine H. Waring and Frances H. Easley; thence
with same and leaving Cove Road, N. 35 deg. 12' 10"
October 22, 1991
t~
petitioner. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson,
Mr. Harrington explained that the stormwater management standards
were proffered so that the petitioner could not request a waiver
of the standards from the staff at a future time. The original
request was for a building that would have a height of up to 100
feet to facilitate visibility from the interstate. The Planning
Commission and the applicant decided to proffer the height of the
building to be no higher than 55 ft above the finished grade.
Supervisor Eddy asked for a determination of what
finished grade meant. Mr. Harrington responded that meant the
property as it is now. The City of Roanoke has a main water
transmission line through the property and will not allow fill
dirt on the line. At this time it is undetermined whether the
City will move the transmission line in the future. Following
discussion of whether the petitioner could use fill dirt in the
future to raise the grade of the property, Mr. Johnson asked how
high the building was going to be in reference to the street. Mr.
Harrington advised that they did not know at this point. Anne
Grove, attorney for the petitioner, explained that the property
falls approximately 25 to 30 feet off Plantation Road and they
considered the finished grade to mean road level and that the
building would rise only about 25 feet above Planation Road. They
have no intention of using fill dirt to create a taller building.
She further explained they were working with the City of Roanoke
regarding movement of the transmission line or easement.
Carol Slate, 7538 Friendship Lane, expressed concern
October 22, 1991
~~
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract
of real estate containing 2.15 acres, as described herein, and
located at the intersection of Plantation Road and Friendship Lane,
(Tax Map Number 18.18-2-5) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is
hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-3, Special
Commercial District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General
Commercial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of
Relau Inc.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing
the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts:
a) The rezoning request from B-3 to B-2 commercial
is for the purpose of constructing a small two-
story hotel/motel (approximately 50-80 rooms)
designed and franchised by the Hampton Inn
Corporation or some other similar hotel/motel
chain.
b) Applicant agrees to construct this building in
accordance with the BOCA National Building Code
(1990) requirements for the installation of a
sprinkler system on the second floor as
requested by the Roanoke County Building
Inspections Department.
c) Applicant agrees to construct this building no
higher than 55 feet above average finished
i
October 22, 1991
east side of Merriman Road, 800 feet north of
its intersection with Token Road, Cave Sprinq
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Joe
Bandy and son, Inc.
0-102291-12
Mr. Harrington reported that the landfill will be used
to dispose of tree stumps, concrete and asphalt. Approximately 25
acres will be an active landfill area. The conditions from a
Special Use Permit issued in 1988 are being complied to by Mr.
Bandy. Mr. Bandy has not yet received a permit from the Department
of Waste Management. The petitioner has agreed to six proffered
conditions and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
In response to questions from Supervisor Johnson, Mr.
Harrington advised that the County does not currently inspect
landfills such as these. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner
advised that the state permit regulates the construction,
operation, closing and post-closing of the landfill. He estimated
there will be 25 to 30 trucks going to the landfill a day.
Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about the dust from the truck
trips, and Mr. Natt responded that Mr. Bandy would be willing to
improve the access road to eliminate the dust.
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern that the state would
not monitor the landfill in regard to complying with the
regulations. He asked the staff to work with the petition to
ensure that appropriate inspections takes place. Mr. Natt
responded that Mr. Bandy would be willing to proffer any county-
.. _'
I
October 22, 1991
exception permit for the location and operation of a stump and
construction debris landfill is substantially in accord with the
adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of §
15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit
to Joe Bandy & Son Inc. to operate a stump and construction debris
landfill on a 74.86 acre tract of land located on the east side of
Merriman Road (Route 613) 800 feet north of its intersection with
Token Road (Route 684), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District,
subject to the following conditions:
a. Active landfilling will not be conducted on
more than 25 acres.
b. A minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be
established from any portion of fill area to
any point on the property boundary.
c. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m.
to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
d. Building construction or demolition debris,
such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not
be permitted to be landfilled on this site.
e. This site will not be utilized as a landfill
until a permit is received from VDWM and copy
of such submitted to the County.
f. The gatehouse will not be visible from Route
613.
g. The 400-foot access road will be paved.
October 22, 1991
,r
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the request. The
motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
ORDINANCE 102291-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.20 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF IIS 220, RED
HILL AREA, ( TA% MAP NO . 9 8.0 4 -2 -2 0 ) IN THE CAVE
SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, OFFICE DISTRICT, TO THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE
APPLICATION OF MA%EY HOMES INCORPORATED
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 23, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was held
October 22, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided
as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract
of real estate containing 0.20 acre, as described herein, and
located on the west side of US Route 220, Red Hill area, (Tax Map
Number 98.04-2-20) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is
hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Office
District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial
District.
October 22, 1991
'' '~ s
.' % ct
1091-7 An ordinance to rezone 4.647 acres from R-3 to
B-2 for general commercial uses, located on the
south side of Peters Creek Road at its
intersection with Barrens Road Hollins
Magisterial District, upon the petition of
Friendshiu Manor Apartment Village Coro.
A-102291-14
Mr. Harrington advised that this request will allow the
site to be developed for commercial uses. There is no proffered
site plan nor have any uses been proposed. VDOT will require a
commercial entrance permit and the staff will require a site plan
review for any of the potential uses.
Supervisor Nickens asked about fire protection or
sprinklers and adequate water pressure. Mr. Harrington advised
that the BOCA Code requires sprinklers for certain uses, and that
there is not even sufficient flow for the current zoning of the
property. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy regarding
a site plan, Mr. Harrington responded that the applicant did not
wish to proffer a site plan.
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about the inadequate
water pressure that could create criticism of the County in the
future for allowing this use. Mr. Johnson felt that the
petitioner will have to meet the code with the limited water
pressure.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the request. The
motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
October 22, 1991
I /
FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORP.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing
the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby
accepts:
a. To maximize safety of ingress and egress to
property along Barrens Road, the commercial
entrance to the parcel bordering Barrens and
Peters Creek Road shall be aligned with the
proposed bus exit near the front of Burlington
School.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as
follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin found on the eastern right-
of-way of Southern Drive, 50' wide; said pin being
202.24 feet from the intersection of the southern
right-of-way of Peters Creek Road (Virginia State
Route 117) and the eastern right-of-way of Southern
Drive; thence with a line parallel to Peters Creek
Road N. 71 deg. 59' 11' E. 410.63 feet to a point
on the western right-of-way a 50' private mutual
cross access easement (see Plat Book 13, page 138,
Roanoke County Circuit Court); thence with the
western right-of-way of said easement S. 14 deg. 32'
29" E. 68.41 feet to a point of curvature; thence
continuing with said right-of-way with a curve whose
radius is 405.57 feet, a delta of 12 deg. 00' 00",
an arc of 84.94 feet, a chord bearing of S. 20 deg.
32' 29" E. and a chord distance of 84.79 feet to a
point of tangency; thence S. 26 deg. 32' 29" E.
296.16 feet to a point of curvature; thence with a
curve whose radius is 255.00 feet, a delta of 9 deg.
51' 15", an arc of 43.86 feet, a chord bearing of
S. 31 deg. 28' 06" E. and a chord distance of 43.80
feet to a point; thence leaving the western right-
of-way of said easement S. 63 deg. 55' S0" W. 391.30
feet to a point on the eastern right-of-way of
Southern Drive; thence with the eastern right-of-
way of Southern Drive N. 26 deg. 04' 10" W. 548.72
feet to the point and place of BEGINNING and
containing 4.647 acres.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
October 23, 1991
~' i 3
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W.
Roanoke,. Virginia 24018
October 23, 1991
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Vinton War Memorial, Vinton,
Virginia, this being an adjourned meeting from October 22, 1991
and a joint meeting with the Roanoke City Council, Vinton Town
Council, Roanoke County Resource Authority and the Roanoke Valley
Regional Solid Waste Management Board.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman McGraw called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. The
roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Vice Chairman Harry
C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L.
Johnson (arrived at 3:45 p.m.), Richard W.
Robers
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk
to the Board;
OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the Roanoke City Council, Members
of the Vinton Town Council, Members of the
Roanoke Regional Solid Waste Management Board,
Members of the Roanoke County Resource
Authority, Officials of Norfolk Southern
Railroad Corporation
e
October 23, 1991
'J
the Roanoke County Resource Authority by motion of Mr. Johnson.
RESOLIITION 102391-1 APPROVING AND AIITHORIZING THE
EBECIITION OF CERTAIN AGREEMENTS FOR THE DERELOPMENT AND
IISE OF REGIONAL SOLID WASTE FACILITIES AND FOR THE
DISPOSAL OF ACCEPTABLE SOLID WASTE
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, the Town
of Vinton, and the Roanoke County Resource Authority hereby intend
to approve and execute certain documents and agreements for the
development and use of regional solid waste facilities and for the
disposal of acceptable solid waste; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management
Board intends to join in the approval and execution of certain of
these documents and agreements in order to assign and distribute
certain assets and property to the successful completion of the
development of a regional solid waste facility; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of all the parties and
of their citizens to undertake the actions contemplated herein for
a regional solution to the problems associated with the disposal
of solid waste.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the terms, conditions, and provisions set forth in
the "Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement,"
"Assignment Agreement," and "Distribution and Indemnification
Agreement" are hereby approved and ratified. This approval and
ratification of these agreements shall be evidenced by the execu-
tion thereof by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
October 23, 1991
L
NAYS: None
2. Resolution an~ointina the initial members of the Roanoke
Valley Resource Authority.
R-102391-2
Supervisor Nickens moved to appoint the County's initial
members of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. The motion was
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw.
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 102391-2 APPOINTING INITIAL MEMBERS
TO THE ROANORE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority")
has determined that it is in the best interests of the Authority
to authorize the City of Roanoke ("City") and the Town of Vinton
("Town") to become members of the existing Roanoke County Resource
Authority, pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and
Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, ("Act"); and,
WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed the proposed "Articles of
Amendment of the Roanoke County Resource Authority;" and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint the initial Roanoke County
members to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the names, addresses, and terms of office of the
initial Roanoke County members of the Board of the Roanoke Valley
.~
October 23, 1991
the Roanoke Valley. He reported this was the first time in America
that rail transportation will be used to haul solid waste from a
transfer station directly to a landfill. He announced that they
plan to have the solid waste at the landfill at 8:00 every morning
for the landfill employees. He again thanked the officials for
including him in the ceremony.
2. Comments b Harr C. Nickens Chairman Roanoke Count
Resource Authority
Supervisor Nickens pointed out that the histories of the
Roanoke Valley and Norfolk Southern have been linked together for
over 100 years. He recognized that Mr. Goode was a Roanoke County
and Vinton native, and thanked the County staff for working so hard
to make the landfill a reality.
Following comments, Supervisor Nickens as Chairman of the
Roanoke County Resource Authority and David Goode signed the
agreement for transportation of solid waste to the new landfill.
IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT
At 5:10 p.m., Chairman McGraw declared the meeting adjourned.
Following adjournment, there was a signing ceremony and reception
hosted by the Town of Vinton.
Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
ACTION NO. A-111991-14.a
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Ratification of inactive status of Health
Department Board of Directors
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Health Department Board of Directors was established in 1985
by a former Health Department Director. Roanoke County appointed
one individual for a two year term to the Board, and the Board was
active for several years.
Since the appointment of Dr. Molly Hagan as Director of the Health
Department, the Board of Directors has not been an active
organization. Dr. Hagan advises that she currently has no plans
to activate the Board, and recommended that the Board of
Supervisors not appoint a member to serve at this time. If she
decides to reactive the Board of Directors, she will inform the
County and the Board may then appoint an individual to serve.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board
individual to the Health Departmen
time as the Board is reactivated.
a letter of appreciation be sent
thanking her for her willingness t
of Supervisors not appoint an
t Board of Directors until such
It is further recommended that
to former member Anne Renner
o serve in this position.
Respectfully Submitted by:
~Qh,v~
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
Approved by:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
~~ a
Approved (~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L Johnson
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Health Department Board of Directors File
Dr. Molly Hagan, Director, Health Department
ACTION NO. A-111991-14.b
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Request to increase the number of vehicles
authorized in the County fleet by the retention of
a vehicle for use by the Read Mountain Fire Station
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~„~~f
BACKGROUND•
The Board of Supervisors previously established an authorized
inventory of vehicles for use by the various departments. Any new
vehicles authorized by the Board during the budget process would
have the effect of increasing the authorized number, however, a
replacement authorized in the budget process requires that an old
vehicle be disposed (sold at auction). The fire and rescue
department has one such vehicle for disposal and has requested that
the vehicle be authorized for assignment to the new Read Mountain
Fire Department as a utility vehicle that can transport additional
personnel to calls and to be able to pull a vehicle extrication
trailer that will carry specialized tools and equipment. Roanoke
County would continue to own the vehicle and the insurance and
operating expenses would be shared in the same fashion as other
expenses of the Read Mountain Fire Station.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The insurance and operating expenses will be shared as all
other expenses at the Read Mountain Fire Station and no additional
appropriation is required for the Fire and Rescue budget.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
vehicle inventory to be increased by one vehicle to allow the Read
Mountain Fire Department to use this vehicle as outline above.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
/John M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
- ACTION VOTE
Approved Motion by: RnYLL JnhnG~n No Yes
Denied x
Received
Referred
To
(x)
/( )
l )
( )
( )
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr.,
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief,
Rita Busher, Director,
Diane Hyatt, Director,
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Assistant Administrator
Fire & Rescue
Management & Budget
Finaace
X
x
x
x
Abs
_ ~,
ACTION NO.
A-111991-14.c
ITEM NO. "'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer and water easement in
connection with the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase
III Project to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of an easement
for sanitary sewer and water purposes over and across property
located in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of
Roanoke in relation to the Roanoke River Interceptor Phase III
Project as follows:
a) Donation of a sanitary sewer and water easement, of
variable width and triangular in shape, from Roger E.
Rardin and Deborah P. Rardin (Deed Book 1069, page 809)
(Tax Map No. 65.00-02-53), shown and designated as "NEW
40' WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT" on a plat
prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, dated January 14, 1991,
and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County in Plat Book 13, page 148.
The location and dimensions of these properties have been
reviewed and approved by the County's Utility Department
engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this property.
Respe tfully submitted,
•\
Vick'e L. Hu a
Assistant County Attorney
s -
K-`~
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. ,Johnson Eddy x
Denied ( ) Johnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens x
to Robers x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Cliff Craig, Director, Utility
ACTION NO. A-111991-14.d
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Robert C. Boyd
and Lois Ann Boyd to the County of Roanoke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of the
following easement to the County of Roanoke for drainage purposes
in connection with the Carvins Cove Road Drainage Project in the
Catawba Magisterial District:
a) Donation of a drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in
width, from Robert C. Boyd and Lois Ann Boyd, also known
as Lois R. Boyd, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1256, page
746, and Deed Book 1284, page 282) (Tax Map No. 25.01-1-8
and No. 25.01-1-24) as shown on a plat prepared by the
Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated October 23,
1991.
The location and dimensions of this property have been
reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of this property.
Respectfully submitted,
Vickie L. ffman
Assistant County Attorney
Action
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by Bob L. Johnson
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Cliff Craig, Director, Utility
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COl-fPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
AN ACCURATE B 0 UNDARY SURVEY. CqR V jNS ~~
~~ s6, s8 c~~~R
~o E D,
n'`
i
i
o"'
ti
2
k O
~e o
... ~
ti
PROPOSED 15'
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(BOTH PROPERTIES AS SHOWN) -
O
0
\O~
? CV
~~
ti o~~q
0
~o ~ ~ ~~ ti
°Q~
~~ '~ ~
~ ,~ ti
~ti ~
~ J k
2~v q ~~
~O .Q.
Q
4S 00,
4SOp,
i
o
ti ~O
~~ ~/
;,
4
ti
=o
Q
~~
~~
- --~ 4 S, 70' ~ / ~' 15, 26
N17'30~
~~' ~/ -~
BELDpN DRIVE
TAX MAP N0.25.O1_1-24 & 25,01_1_8
PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED 15 FT. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TD RDANDKE COUNTY
BY ROBERT C, AND LDIS A, BDYD
of
i
o•''
ti
=o
k
~Q
SCALE: 1 IN_ = 40 FT.
PREPARED B Y.• R OANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 10 / 23 / 91
/~'-I
COIINTY OF ROANOR$, VIR~3INIA
GENERAL FOND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
$ of General ~ 1>
Amount Fund Expenditures
Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1991 $4,269,399 6.10
and Balance as of November 19, 1991
Submitted By
~ ~~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement
to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25 of General Fund
expenditures ($70,036,927).
~-a
COONTY OF ROANORE, VIR~iINIA
CAPITAL FIIND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 6,097
August 15, 1991 Sale of Shamrock Park (Board approved
sale on March 26, 1991, Sale Finalized
August 1, 1991) 34,914
Balance as of November 19, 1991 S 41,011
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
N-~
COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
RLSSRVE FOR BOARD CONTINaB~TCY
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 50,000
July 9, 1991 Additional funds for Alleghany Health
District (8,000)
July 9, 1991 Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors
Bureau (3,000)
Balance as of November 19, 1991 S 39,000
Submitted by
/,rQJlle.j /V • ~~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - October 1991
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Payments to Vendors: $2,255,548.01
Payroll: 10/11/91 $ 453,533.08
10/25/91 466,013.62
10/28/91 161.35
919.708.05
$3.175.256.06
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors.
Respectfully submitted,
~~n~~~ ~ . ~~~
Diane D. Hyat
Director of Finance
Approved by,
{ ~-~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by:
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
,,_____~ rJ ~ 4,/ ,- 'v~.__ ti.r~ J __~v.:/
V.,J.. u' ~J .~/ ~ W~
~.J ~ V 4._ _ -..{
, '
-
t^
R ~1 C W ~
~ ~n I Y ~
~ _: V C q
~ Y W J ~L yy
U e~ sn W t l~ !•
_.
...
_
l
i
'~.
'
~.I ;I i ~ I
P-,:- ~~~~-.ONM~-W ~f (`NMiFN ~-PU7 .-P tl7MNMmMm{71 r-~ 00
N
o N Ui V• N IL71 In In p o
P p M m '
'
'
'
N
`- f
~*^~
//
~
' 1 I
I r 1 I
..
M tt U1 M V
ifl .- ~ U7 N
-- N M ~ ~
V
OJ U~ N '.7 M a~ Ifl 7 N J~ G+a0 N N ~O .- J~ I~ N iU Lfl -,- D+ O o to as 'q• {!1 ! Q 'iR rr
I
/
j
'
m i 1 C Di,l
I a I ':I I
M~ MMMMaO VIVO roMUt 7'iv a0 .-o (~-;N a0 io O00 Wc. Ul kil ln; ~ ~
~.- ,
it ;
\ 1 L H!I a+..n 6+,. M ~--DDM~O ap N? 6+U~ ~N.. [~:.- J' 0+11716 .•-NPIC++ N~ N M
N i i L 1 ': I (U M o V' '~ ~ 7 ~ j ~ i ;.- N N ~1 N iP+
1,
~
W W I I 1
I i
I
IV' lt7 lfl 7 N to ~N l!1 U N Ift 00 m M ~o o M ~N m~ W N ~ M ~N lfl ~ W
T o ~O j
hO
.O
U' F- I T : I N h m M u~ ~- N G+ .o c. .- m P N o V' 7 Ip~ .- o P N b N' o M <n N; N m OI ~~
¢¢ ' 1 ., T.i Nu o~o6m~oNf~ V"C.~N N.MM N.o MV' a+: MI11 I, Nino Mi 7 ~o of ~I
'~ ~ ' i r C I 0+ .O M M N V' V u N M ob ,- '~f ~~'~.a N to G. M O~ '~ N Ul N OJ 1I1 ~- ~
I
: N
IO h! I :
o!
'
~. ' I C O 1
' I O : I ~ 0 0) t- N. N
M .- t!t
M ~- N~ N o .- F ~- N M R
M *- ~ MNI '~ .- i ^ i~ - M .- i ~ N
lV :,
? I
O' I ITIJ N ; I
i ;
~ j
i
' c
I I I
;
7 0 0 0 0 0 O O q 0 ~O O o O O O b 0 0 ~O O i O o M In 0 0 0 V' M I? O ~
~
'M ~ I
I,M
~ ~~
} I N o 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 Oo 0 0 0 0 0':.0 0 o a o~ y o W O' o 0 o M oIM to
I
~
'
' jd i~
-
LL r ' i aD o
0 0 0 0 0 o'f-Moo t(1 M p Ul P-,o op o N M
~
o 0 0
0 0 0 0 l!1 0 Io o
'
' :I a I I
~ I U ' I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .. ^I ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ ^
M ~o o U1 0 0 0 'o O o N o W v O O+:M Ul U1 U1 N -- o N U7 ~06 7 0 ~..- .- Itr N I
!aD I
;W I
' ~ :1 L ' I V' o Ul N P to m W V' N - V• ~ l11 Ul Ul .- N o'.. t!1 ~- M Ifl'M 7 !n 0+ M~,.- M :UY to ' i
11 7 '~ 1 Q' M
N P v M ~f N V~ M M N N a0 ~'Q I N! !n N ~ M,M N o m illt !N I j
I ~ I CA I I
^ ^ - ~ ~ ;
'. I ~ 1 M ~ ~ ''~ : ~.
.
_,
I'
~ jF ~~` I
', I I I U"I
M Ul o,N .- •- •- !il M;o O N
.O !N P
F e. M'1~- N eU ~~m 47 N US e+ ~t~ o
,F ~ ~ IN
;
N'. I
1 r '1 c• o. P .- m 0)P N Ui .-,M In W 7 M '~tN O'o N P'o N ?'W !N o
U~ N M N' a+ mi I
'
:' '.I C Cl: I 7'w' O Ul? 00 N P !n N o P W 7:N .- W •- •-.M O ~O I!Y F-;N .n O'1O jV m Ll1 Illy I
'
~ 'I L1-.I N !n ?'.P ap i~ o:MMODI~OP.6 io :NN
o.-NO0.U1P'V•o~no NIoD .-'.
I
I ; I L I I 117 N of c+.c0 Ul .~'OJ .- V' '.~D U .- tY ~ M Mlo+ M !n iM !o+
~ IV ;
Y
I I :1 7L~I I ! ~.-I oNI~ ~N
.-m ~ oM' ~ v !o o~ I i
I . 1 !
.- I •-~ {
'~h ~;
f~ ~
c
~ ~
i I I i
G~ ', 1
I I ..
~' 1 I
j l I
irl N P M.M• CU W G• Q? N:h1 c+i~ o'f~ .- V',117 117 oloD ~ •-'•- In OpO o CU '.00 tN T
' IN
- 'N ~ I
'' .- ro I .o N m:o N V' W !N o
o+ ut P N:c M N:~ ~n «J P N In -r'M VI eD !V' M 7:1~ oD Im '~o+ , ~,'
~
I a~ 7 ' I V'.m o lh V o] N.G+ LO No c~.W V'~N .- O .- ~'.M o :~ to N-.N P o;o ;7 m IW !tn j
I 0.~ '.o V ~~ I o ~~ N ODiU7 - P v o ~O o 117.E ~~N U1 st o+ m~~.- o -~M M n) ~ a~ m'o ~,N N .-
O+ 0+ ¢ I UlN OJ G~aD W ~ U .•V ; ~ ~ .- : ? .- M M: 0~ M NM P j'p V
: a L }• q ' i
LL F- i ' I
~ ; 1 ~
~
' 'F
I ,,F I
i Y O
' I } I
i ` ! I
~ '
I C
ro N I
! I I I j : ~. ' i ;
:
o 0 o O~ 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 ~. 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 '~ O!. C+ O Ij} 0~~, 0 0 ~7'OO O•; O a0
.
'
lap ~ i
.Oi j
I
O a
I ; 1 ; 1 ,P U5 .- W o
aD o M o o o U5 ~,.o h-:~ W P
O'.o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0.O 0 0 0 o
'
' IM M.
,
, 2 7 I I r i i . ~;
o Lf7 I~IO ~ M:R U7;N N
0 ~l0 0 0:0 0 0 0 L17 0 o O o o Lf7iQ+ N QJ '~D o !l17 111,
.
I i4- a ' I 41 '. I P'~.o 0 0.6 0 Oo (t! olU7 Ul o.o Ut,-- N st' ~O Ul'i 06 N 00 W o P Oy el•'; .- ~
~ j~
' .
~''~ f I
'
O > .I •O I . ~O o D-I~t 7j~ M
i^•lo 0 o'ap o .a'LA o U'I~ M oo ~.F o7 M O dI M N .- 0• OD o)
,
~ ~ 7 l
, P o M M M Ul :.- M M M N N c0 N ~- ~O N .- .- : M 7~ i O ; u V' 100 06I
?. ~
I ~r j q
i
II I o.'M .- ~' 7 ~~N ~ i j M N-:N Ih ~
~ ;~ .o;
j C 0. '. I I I M ~^ I
i ~ II ~I 't r' F f
I 7 O i - ~ i I ! I ~ I
10
i U C
I
~~! 1 ! I
U~17 ~ V'n N ol~ N -- of ~o NOU ~'o U M'o 0+ 06',N o M N N N~'o M P,~o U5 0)'o U7
NNo~
'~-•0 ?
0N
OnM V"N V'mM~D M'
~
'
'
'
'~o
~~
I~
:~O
_
O
''~ N jI ;1
t .~ '' 1 ,
.
ap
R ~9 o-mcU '-N ~-~W ~o
i
,o In Lfl
M
,M V
00 ~
V f~ M!N ~- ?;N'Q N UI .- ~O~W Q' ODIN V'
N!C' U misi G~ N:N Lf1 W'v c+.~.V V''. ~M M
~I b
i 1 7 1 ~
I
^j .
^; ^
N M!o C JI '7 O~r- UIrP R' M~tlO 00 0+1O N M.~ 1o
^M V' P~U .- o
.- N V W ~- V'
D {
~0
L
t j 1 ;
,
M o N~~O f-
V' M'? W .O UI N N~'
M o N
tn .-'
~- ^
P N 0'
00 V' 7 CU ~ P
M
~ M N I
i
b
{ d I r
I V ~' I .
.
.
;
j
I
jv
.
o,.o N M:. V' ISM M M M N ~:h iN N NI Tt,N M 0+!M N NSF N to ~'
M I
IM
i
E
O Io d 1
;G+ ! I .i I ~ I i ^ I
O+.N .- V' ~ N ! ~ 7 II ~N G+. stn
~
~ I o o! P M O CO N O .- st,~ M: o+ P
o:o o N. 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o o', r- o o I~ F~
i
I} ! I N io 0 ~; 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 O',o o;. ~ o W o U'i. N o o a• o. o .- P-? M: ~- M F i
Fi
~ ~ 'ILL r i. ( r- X01 V' ~D
R'1O o X10 o OO O O o o O,,O NI U~ O Nlfl C0~•t r-.O ~ 71,0 M 7: ~O Oi ~ ;
7 ~ it I m I j
.-'~o N M' V~ o o ~~o o I11 0 0 0 !.o U7 ~. M o IN M' ~ .o N ~- a0 0 <!• F IF ap' N N i V' R, ~
I
. U I I L ~ 1 r-'.ln 00 P'.h o .~o .O N 0.l M III :.o .-~.o N ~ h; ~:Q M N~N M ~'.W jo a0 Ln ~~ I
.
I I ! 1 7 I tnd o N', N Ul ~- N M N N ~- N V' ! ~I M:N M m;M N oil joy ~O M' M; i
' ro I II i N I.-~ : RAN j j ;
j
a I m , ~ ~ rn I I ~
I m I
I
O I ~ ro a I 1 j T ! a l j
j ! I LO O. ~ N '' r r ~ { I.
L E N'. ~
L
~ I I
I ,
I
.. ' ' T a ~ U . -.~
C ~ N' ;.
! I
o a~.. iva ~ 1 ¢m ;o I
I G. N j a~3 UI I '~ C O I N NI a
~ i.- ; '
I I ~' !N
INrO'.a LL al I I O L W a..+U ~I
j I i is ro ! x i.y x~IJt ! N ! ',Ed •.I~ip ..a a
~ ~
,
; N x~ a N'O I a UI~, N a >. V> b U
' x L r
~
a ~+- 0. W E 7 L' •~ L •~'. L
ro O N:. h- N` x N C F- O a
o ~ i f- d a, F- ro CIO x ; O N; U. j N L' O O a; N C !~ N i L a d, 7 i
!
~
I L U 0. F a'. .~+ N E:U. a a 7; U~~ L a '., .•+ N` O u0 I O
~
~
~ a N N,; a a •.~ OI> J< ~ ~N
NIT O a'O ~ U}rF O'; at OI
'
~
i ~ alr U r' r: a ~~+ N O'.'O LL C iLL a ~+, Ul N >; O N r+! a r+ +~ {
x L C 7 x •.+- N J U a 0!:; a I ~~ OI d, U U Lj L~ Ui Ut N. r b u QI
ro:a a.. a ro~ C L N ;L :V -r L4-I a0_ VN a•..; i0 •.I •.+iC O
Z
j ' ; r l a u •.. 1- •~+ a x a O C ~-+ b O .+ ' L ro L'! E E N( UI N, V N V i U U L: •~
' •~ C O O O V
I
'
! I~
LL
•.+ 7 L O
' O O U 7 O
O •++ W, J r U N ~•-~:. U a a d L
)
~
' i
~ a ffi W C
O U U.! L L LI a 0 U L a Vi
ai L> N~ •'I !- U
a U r; a l0 r; 7
I r,0^ L I1CC a jJ •~~a'•~ OjL a CIO] ~U 4. IL O L a O d ,r N
'
' J I
i !
I I
' ! O U x W I N W r! C UI
T •O'. Y-~ N C
N a s r~ .-. N; a L J ~' n. x O:
r '+ UI •~ ro L' UI Ul a. C ~ N V: V i 4- d C' N N L iG Gr a W , r N .~ L Q
F- JJ~I
Q~
1
! N I N r. r (A a' UI ~-+ >~ O a w: I F- '', C N j 0 O NI a a N [0 .~ L r a'~ to a U U_ d O !1"^{I
I !
I W I C U •.~ C E; a t r '- ~-+' ro r ; U : 7 7 a l ~••~ a. N V L': L i w
J] a> U a N'i L N t
: L N
N ~ !
c O UI C C O
'
:
' F O
F
j W
W I
~ a
..
I
O ~.~+ -+
a ~-+ 7: C U L
N ~•+ ~. N L
a -+ a:. a s E' V E N' L r a a a L E V O 1 L wl a w a a C
'+~ U .-~ ro. E N N! ~-+ C O y
j
to ! ,
N~ L J] C: T U C" N N r x ~.. r x L ••+: C L a'. a O C>> N.~ N U C ro ~'L A L L b Q ;
a s 7 a N O 0i 7 L O N r O ro r C N a a'. -~ t •~* a s L, a •.+ N O L al r a r! r L Z' i
~. it I ~'addaJU,61 lL~HOSf-04,JO.U.:U a. It::~~U~,~EOC,Z fn 3;O3 O1O F-
~
I i Q
CI L
:' Z 10 '
o~.-NM V~o.-'NMst lf7 .o f~W Po~N V;1~-o?c~'or-N;o~~n o.-~1M O.CNM
I ~ I
~
'
'
I U O.
I U^ a ~i
O; '~ G+P
NNUl .O ~O a[11N OD
1? V V
r-~-~-~-NNNNNNNNNNM.MMM,;MMt
ofooo,oooaoo!ooolooo:ooo~oooooooodooo!ooooo
I~ o ~ I i I
I
r I
._ -,:,
QO
,-,_
a
^ .~
00
o~
o^
ww
~~
¢¢
~. q
N
C
O
ro
L
a'
O
L
a^
ac
q'
bM
)cam
ro b
A N W
. d I-
.u¢
~Cq
ro
F.LL"
uao
~E
) 7 N
V ¢
oc
W I
. _
Yd Z
Lo
.~ ~'
• M
a ~•+
x 4.
W 7~
wo
o
d
O
d i
.C
U
y i
j
I
l
i
E I
i
i
i
j
f
i I 1
j b 4- I
I C a O
d E' r I
Q 7 \ d I
x U ~ I
~ W C ;ro L I
j W I ]
i q N m
H W ,ro I
r i I
I b
d
L d I
I ~d U 1
' E ro 1
] '" 1
U ro 1
'C 00 I
I ~d 1
iC i '
I p
N.
t d'Iw I
I L W 1
I ] tE 1 '
•.~ ~U p
•O iC F
C W N I '
d I
` 4?b 1
x ~ I ~,
f W~rnd l l
!C U I i
i M C 1 !I
i "t7 ro 1
~' C L
ro a r.
r E 1
N ] ( '
r U I '
] C I
O W I -.
N
I d I i
L
~ 7 1
~ I 1
IL I li
Ir V I ~
C C I ;
~O d I i
s a I j
x I ~
W
I
I ..
d I
i U I '
'O I 1
] I
j i m
1 ,
it
I
i
d E ~ ~ '
` ~ ~ i
j ~ I
1
I ~ I - i f~
N I
a s i ~
r
l I L I i' ~I.
Q
'O Z! ' i
~y ~ ~ II -
1
.a j '
I .( I I
• J+w d- ~ 1t Y ~ h 0 C~ ~j
i;
i
I
i
0
I q I
•i
I y
r
I
I{
1
f
I
40071
OM1 o W
•i
P h ^ '
sl•M M
j
11100 Q~'. o
M o N ~ h
(`- N ^ ' o
CDT00~ a0
.- T .- M
}^7^~ h
I M M
i
at' h ~O I p
~ 7 ~O h
II l11 ~D : M
N N 7 i c
00~w' c
o ^
N N
McO+' N
hNh1 00
aNtn~ N
M a+ ] M
~ ,, h
3
I '
ti M N { M
f'1^7~ c
N I'1 ^ ~
F ~^ ~ O
~ ~' { to
r`aw{ c
00 h h i ?
o^N' l11
o.O h~ M
Ntl1^ c
~; 1 ~;
v i E
ro V
L j 6
r N;
N .+ ~ r
C rol C
..+ •.+ ~ d
E U; E
L •.+ ~ C
¢ 0. L
0.{ d
.+ O i >
ro } o
•.+ W j O
V
C b ~ .-~
C roI L
„~ p' d
~~.m~ c
d
vM kJ N ~ (Q
r rol
ro .~ L i o
^~ ro Oi o
FN d UI o
IBC dI
d d .•~
09 W I
O O 0!
^N~1
1
0 0 O
J M
~ ~ _i,~
il•
1 J I
.~-~
»;
*I W
Ws Z !
~~ (9
r ..
N (/j
1- N
¢
q' I
W Z
a ~
C9
N 1! i
N et
N
¢ o
Z o I
~' O
dF { i
•1t t
of
o '
OI
O I
',
G+W Oj 111 O~C+t7h ^'-^hh.-^^ ooMC I
oN^ o+lflNNb Ntp W ^M.O lil ~ 007111
ODN7~'~. Mlfl lli~N oNh00oom'~ ~ti^
N M^ ''~ M M M M M i M N N M 7 M N' M M
~ i :
!1
1f1 .-a''. +- O'~00M~'uN O O~[Oh.-h O, M oMON I
hLfl , 7 0~ W 7lfl .o W OD.-cNM h-. h oN~N
Mc^' 7 ~OOlltoh o tfiG+W ~Oh^7' 7 o7otll
Molfl m 111 N N glno ^~7O ol11MN ~
507 o aO~No.- W OhO+.-7~0 .O! 7 Nhlflc ! ~ ,
V' N h to h 7 N ~- o ~ 7 ~- M^ 7' h ': M M l11 i
^
i ~!
N p In ; h 7 v7 0 7 .- ~7 M h a0 :~ lfl b Ifl ~P j
111 C67; q 7OCUio P 111111OtDMO111; ~b O lnN '
T p. OD ! d h^ M M h N M 7 o M CD 7 .- ~ U1 0 ^ h
b7 ~o bMh77 O O?~NUU V'Ndi ~C o 0~7 :
W.- P 7h h^l11 •o MNh W O+h Pj OD N N7 ~ j
N ODCh^ h I11dN N ~M j
~ ^ '~
i
M! 7 tt7MUlo (~ ~ cci0 ~D ~0
O c: O+ OoNtn M ~ NTf'1 7i, o c: i
CU O~ o Nc~NLO 111 '~. o c W W:~ 7 c~ '
fU N P o 00 00 ~tl l!1 i CU ~ ~ ~~.
!t? MI N 1 ^! M 1 j
^ i i
~ 1 i i j ' ;,. j j i
t I ~ i I ~ I j
I III y i. ~ ' ,.
I
~7N o a. 00m~.op N h'ohc111cc~ c b w';o 1
'v 0 7{ ^ m .e/ r• m h a m 'M O ~o c M .- I v a0 ^ ,7
IO' N ~O ! o t~ h OD o h N o ,0+ 111 O+ p N L(1 ~ M w o (11 I 1
IP .G 7 ~11 p c .c N l0 [n I..n M h h h •- i M .- M1 .P j ~I
111 N ^.i 00 P N 00 M .- b~ 7 OD I`.^ 7 I 00 i+ 7 h '
~ ~ MN GO ~ .-^~ ~ 7
i
f ~~' ! j ~ 1
pp O O{ N o 000 L,M M tit N ~^ o T {11 lA h j P M ~O ~h i i .
~D ao o~ N I!1 h h -:0 111 Lfl M 7 N 111 ~•- 7 N i M I N ^111
N00 0~ -- M~ U'.77 M m;T 06 oU~ If1 aC: o ct N.N
~7 (f1 ~O i d N ~t N ~lll h ~N .o ~.o W O d~ 7 i' aD th M N i
7 t11 ~ o N M o .- .~ 7 N ;c .Lt P ~'i M u~ i N ~ h h 7 '.
~O M 0 7 h N M^ 00 ^ ~ o h u7 N ~D ; an M G+tn ',
i
~ .- 1!1 N N :' ~b ~ N C I ~
^ i
I
I I o u o' ]•
! ~ > j0 L
.~ d O
'+~- to r i w . d '
~~ C'. rot ~:.
? I ;ro M:O '>. Lr N ~
d l :L 'C !r r; ~~ N ~I 0.i
' L I ~ Cb b- C, ~ ~I L O;
l
r c{ b ;d u ov a ~r ad rnaL; a -+-+v•..
.+ r, ] 'U N C!•~ C ~] ;CAN U C E d' ] 'ro ro C'. N
ro •~" ti !L d O'r O '~, ri..... C •~+ O Nj d !d d d N
d 3'~ '~O ~ •~', V U C1J q ro,L V ': .2 2 r'¢
NC Ei o ;C~b U:L••+ 'o r!r d d d dro', o L+ U•~+,U '~, '.
r O •~, N W d'r ro M U1' d N r C O~ L', 7 ro •~ L .~ 1
L E r'. o d L N E a •..., d] C •~ ro d ,. o ''.. r .+ d ~. •+ ~~
U E U i ~i 3 L L C •~+ ~ N! L 4- •~+ Q~ L C' ' C a ~. a I I
O O •~+ I : ro ~.+ O O C N r d ro C ro d '~ , d ] 7'] ''..
IC) U>; J Irt. VDU ¢ ¢,tA OC E W t1 W:~ ~ d N,O..
0 o U1~ ~0 0 00 111 I olln o 111 0 l11 0' `o ltl o'.ln
t^ N N~ ^ N M'7 7 ~ ~-'-- N N M M 7'. IN N M'M '
N N N ~.M M MM M 717 7 7 7 ~' 71, L/1 lf~ tll l11
',O O O~ O o C!'.O O O,O 0 0 0 0 Oi :O 0 0 0
~ ~ • ! ~ '~
I
t _ _
_ ~ O d I
..~ t.. ~
b - -
- ... .. ,. ., . .n ., .. • .. ., .. ,
N ~ j i '
0 0 ', ~.
o \ ~ : ~, i
o ._ ~ - ~! I
o
wW
~' I
~~
I
'
II
f
~ :..~• I '~ i
o ~~:F ^ ,
V ~f~- m ^ N
a0 W O+ N T ~o
,
.- O+ '0 0 0 ~'O 0 0
~
' I CnO I oIO+O+ m~,cONeDM
' '
; ooV.-f-,op No.oooooo
! ~
'
a E' Y 1 1
d 7 ~\ a I L
~o O i . ~,
.
.
t~ o o~ N In ,
^ f7Y l71 VIN
I
p N -.
x U' ~ 1 '. o;M V N'M N N AD M ^ N fU N!V ~- ~
I '~ W C' ro V I j
^
~ .
W, 7 1 I ! , ', ~
~ q ~I N m 1 i ~
~ F W ;
ro 1 ! ' '. ' '
j I
I .
r l I~ .
~
; . ..
~ I ~ ~
i
In j ~ N 1 I "~oD of F UI'M o o 'a m l F M V'V
^ N M I 0 0 0 t11 o N;
o c0 o
! C L a I ;. ;N aO In 1l1 ',M ~-No .-! NNONO~N V m~.o V omoM'.
. N
O ! I ~ a U t inn m i~ 00 ~~ N N 'o V, N^ N l11 t~ :a0 M j ~ o m;
N M o m o c~
~.. ~ E N 1 ~M V iV V Im N O 'M o
' N V ~^ ^ N~1~ o~ a6 OIO V o M o [p;, a0
~ ! ro ! ~ ~ 7 ~•+ 1 ~ ; V O ^ o w aS .- F
~. F .- 111 c+ Vl : m I. m m o~ o I to o; m
:
!
f i. L- i i C m 1 ~
i i i I
i tl ~ s I I N
^
^ I '
j O C I I ; ~~ j I i ',
;
i
I L '~ I ,
~ ! I ~
a ^
~
ml i
~
~o
'
M
o M U1 ~ Ifl~~l" ,
W :~ I
111 Ni
^ N'
^
j ; d o+;
6 \' - a I ,
L:n I j V it0 ~
CjM O~ M
~!] M V M
ifl
Op
V 171 M a ;
.-,
N ^? UJ o'. III
NI, .
.
lIl 0+: m M;
N
j
.
t i ^' , -. 7'E 1 ,, o~.M T ~',N ,
IIIM N W'V1 ql•, 1!1 N N N V.N o~ ^ m'. u w'.
'
'
ro C \~ -d U D I '~ ~CIjT V 'L71 O~!oD V N:'I~• IIt' V V m o f~~.
U1
' N', V 7: M oDi
.
-.. ro o~ ~ ~ C 1-^ 1 i ,-~o V ~tfl N:aO M M'.- +o, M .-
N M ^ m:, c ^ O: f•-
' a! I ~
j I ~
I~ N W T F a'b I j ~ ~ ~ E
COI
ro i ; rn a
. C V i '~, ~
j~
~N
m'. N
~ o
o f
:, .I ~
m
' L lL! i.+ C 1 j M M t"/.~ M: '. .- I UY! I11
~
~c E ' ~ ! C L I B
~' ,: I ,
O 71P ': ! 'Iron I ~ ~ i N
V F' ~ ^
IroC i N71!
~7 C 1 j ;
~
_ 2' !O W I i ~ ' ~
:
i
V- N F,.i I ~ ; ;. ~
L O' ~ a 1
~ ~ aD aD )
{J11 r. V ~ •- ~D Ut _~ In .G; o j I
w N~ '.o N! G+
' T 7 S', L I i W N V'IF N G~ 111 V Ul N 1f1 V i M G~ IM O
N In O~
~
r r T 7 I ~ :m oi. ,p M i o m N.N o gyn. m~ V ,-,
'.7 ~ d: '.iL ••, I ~
,N 'ln o!I!1 0] ~ V~ N V N N 111:: F~;, ~- U1 Ut' V`
:O C Uj I ;jr V I I N
I ~~tn olc~ o N V .- o+; W!
~~ c•~
`U a ~' C C I ' ~N ^ N. i !
! X• w
i O a 1 '.
~ a 1 '
~
I
~ ~ w x 1i ~ ~ ~ I
I
`~'! ~ w ~
~ I ~ I
w o~
~'
O I ~
1
V;t~V
^ I I
^NU1MO
o
Na'MOO'.- :
N~
No~o0 0 O
'
N
I I ~
~ V ! o~ ap N sY:' 1~ ~n UI : o M' V M Ul -- o' oD N : o V o o
V ~
' V
' a ' ~, ' ~+ I om C~ :~ Vlm c o'171 o+ 07 M~o M N,~o V': V o o u' o~ o
I r-
7 1 7' O~ 1 m, N m 'o+ V P• ~o ~,o 1I1 .~ tb'~ N o, M N, N M o V o o
~
• o
V 1
I a lLi
( V l j
i 7 1 ~ ;ln o
_ I M ~- Imo.
;N m:tn .- V-.N
M N^ ~ M
aD o N V N h•j^
v^ M ~- aD.
o~ ^
o 0 o iIl
V
N ^. M N ~- N
o
te
' V ro 1 i M
I N, I ~
^ ^
to
; L I,. 1 1 ;
~ ~
~ ,
'. : ~ '.
,, j ~ ~, ~
C i ,
ro M 7 D.
(7 ~ I C i 1 7 ro'.
~ ro: C ~ N
f '~ i. j (
~ ( •.O.
i
~ S ~
7 I L' W
~ L~
~ a'.
E ~ C
O N
k t ~ r i L O C ..
o o_ : v a
; ~
1 ro
a
! o
o
L 'Y
o'
' c m L ...
I ' M L i v a~ a c .,
' m m 7 m
iN ro v ro a x M Y
I ~ I ~ j C 'w i L >: ro C'' C' L > E
~ C
~ ro f .~•~ r L
. a O~ V O t, a ~b E C 'fl a
! ~ OI a .
I N a w L •~+' C •~+ 0;~, O O C a E
0 ~
{ a! L i 3 G, C 4l' G U N' a 3 ~+, N ~ T U r a U 17( ~+
Lj O i O, •~+ '. a a P C E a ro a >: U1 .+ C d C r L
ro. .a •.~ E O~ E ~ C a. d •.+ a U +~': L ~.• .••! x ro C
++ : ro
k ~~ f r,: m t r' v Y t ~~ r' o> L L ~
•
~ ,
... ! a L >Iw .-~ ~ a
i I ~~a ,t ro~ ¢ 'u , cx'..ao7 c u- No ~ roo a
t I. i - ~ ~ ,,,~` ~„~ U I w a N~ •.+ N O W'i a K O. O 7~ a lR .•~ d ~+; a w V q
i t ro; ++ I••+ L' O C~ L .x N ;> VI N E:~ C 7 W L •~+, ~•+ U I
I ~ ! f C, C> ~ N U U O~ C L a' a Y C a E~. a O\ •~ '17!.O TQ C
!; ~ o''IaL 'a a' -..w ro .H>.gcro~ o; maw.darou o
.. j
I •.+~ > a IS W: Y vl d' +•~~ a L
~ U, C'~ a L! a C ?; Z
~
~ yi ro N I C 7~ ~. U ~+
U E F. U ' a ro .~+ ~••~ U N a L
~N { 7: _ ! o w7. T ro n ro o' C N, •.~ d .•• o a .•..-. ro L U O o
1 ', ~ I I I Yi .+ ~ o I L ~+ L o .+ L'', E O U L o T .-. a C a' 7 C w. o
~ f
I
I •w' L N lfl UI ro Ul L 7 N' C a, O .. •.l O q~ O d W O N n •~+ C O+
!S
~
I II ~r ~..., o ac: L •~ r r o: C fS C a m r of ~-. U ~ 7' E +~ a o
'q I I Ulj 7 U I G.: n N C ~•+ ro O; O> n' N I O. Ut x OI u.j •.+ C
i q _ ' " i G O O ' +O. ++ N O 7 .~ O~ U a 7. •~+
' i E N a a:' a O C
L
;i i ~•~+i ?- N dl J d U. V 2 U
,, W q d' _ W E~ 1- [C ~: lr U ..
Y
! L q~ i j O, III O j
~ d O O O, O L11 0~: U1 O O O ~ O I!1 O 111 6 (jl O Ify'
O i 2: ;. V:V 111 I --:MV Lfl'~D ~N:NM V111 ! --NMM V..V 111171
tn'Intn I r-rr-r~1~ aoasoawarco j c,~mmc~c~c~m
~ ~ ~ ( oio o f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~ i I i ~
i i I j i ,
t
_ j
;
1
•. _
_
~
,
-- _
__ _ _. _.. _ __ ___ _ ._.~ _. _. _- -- - _ - .
Op O
M o
DD V N
N U1 M
ap N
~ N ~
N N 111
P O+ O
N M
M M
,m 'w
M M
~ In
M M
~ N
1!1 '111
O O
M 'M
M ~
M IM
'ln ~; to
I,i In
F ~• ~-
^ N :f~
V N ' ~
o (~ F
a0 N I W
V c~ I M
07 G+
M iM
!
r +~ I
7 7
0 0 ' r I
7
I N N i O '
L L
a a ! N
0.4- L
N N a
I C C 0.
ro ro : N
L L ; C j
rr 'ro
jL i
vv ~• I
C C
7 7 p
IL ro ', O+
l a L ',o
!rr '
C C I,
H ~.
b b
c+ a,
Ioo
I -
p
A
p
g
c
3
{~
__ ,,,
N t n ~~ .- r
~ n
_... i
I
~ n'
i, n r .. ~ .. , i , ~
...
j
T ~ i j III
l j
: i ~
,
~ i, j
I ~
I i, I
:.
- ~~. i
j
o o ` { ~ ~ ~ { I I
i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~
~ ~ ~
W I i I
i
~
i
~ ,
aa~
f i ~ I
'
~
I j I ,
ao ~ ( ~ ~
i i , i ~
~ I i
I I
i
i ~
i
I
I ~
.L 4- I
~
~
!U ~
~ 'I : li
i '
G C .O O 1 ~
~ '
1 d E V i ~ M i
I ~ a7 m1 , ~. ,
~ x ul rn I
w c ro v i
~
i
W ~
~
i NCi i f
C7 ~ '
I ~ ~ ~ '
I Hw ro I t
I
C j
~ :L d I ':
id U I b
!1 ~p i
to I
'
O ~.
i } . ,
I
..r
I C I
s
I ~ ! IN N i
~ iC OD I i
d ~ ~ ;d I I !n I71
' ',
~
1 w l i ~
I~ ~ ~
I ~
'.
a~-~ m
I
~ 7 E I. ~4 7 .
~ V M
ro c~~ ~ ~+ 7 I I
•.. u^ 1 :,
m
ao
I
.. ro o ~ v' c I- I F ul In i
,
'M .•.. c w r 1 icu N
' ~
rnuiw~ aw I m m , ;
ir. mr, x1 1 I
u¢i w I
y CA,
N
i
~ I
~ 'rny
C U I i
.-
• f. LL
~ '•^~ C I I !fl lit.
IN d O~ ;d ro I~
j 'tU N~ ~ ~ I
:~ a ~ roa i i ~ ~. i
0 7 u~ ,
i
c
:
~
C U Q ~ ~ r E I
~ ~
~ r, .
ro C
~O 111 I:.~ ~ Ul 7 1
~
ja U I N N f
i
I j i 1 I ,~ ~'
~ f i I ~ '~ I I J ~ ~
O mZ
~ I ~ N ~ i ~ '.
L O
~T 7 S~ G v I
L I I ~L(1
jln l17 ~
N. ~ _ : I
;1+ y I i ~ T 7 I
~ 'M M 1 ' '
~
IC •.y J .
I
,
-~~
i
I i ~ ,
I
. ~i ~ I
E7 'O Q.{ .
t ~ I .-
! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I F:
'O C Vi
~ vL I I N
~
Cl N LO ~ C C I
''. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
d tw
x u,
I ~. O v I
s a I
'
W i. I
kp I
I _
( ~ i
W f x l
~ ~
I I I
I
~
1 W I I '
~ I
I
~ i
'
~~
O ~I I
'
I M
; M j
' ' I ~ 1 I _ ~ ~
I ~
F
i
d f
~ i I
.. I ~
~o d
o ~ C ~ ! i
~. i
.r
7 CI
7 I W i ~
V~ 1
W ~i 'I I
a0 i :. i
I ~
~
I
~ _ V l LL : ~ 1 4f1
' lfl ~ !
~ 1 I I
~
i i f
i
y ~ 7 1 ~. , lfl UI
i ~
~
,C .r
~ m 1 I I ~ ~
- i
! i I
1 ,
i U m I ! ,
,~ .•. ~ ~
[(1 ~ i i h !~ ~ ~ ~ I ',
1 ~,
~
~ ( i i
~ (.
d {
f
°i
I
I I
I
I
qp ~ I
d. ~, j
!d I 4. .
i~ j
I
'o j
a- ;
o
;Z
;~
i~
Q J
F Q)
O !-
F
I~ ~
I GI
Z
I,
I ,
}~._~:
n m e I'~rv m a m n __~ i s
ACTION NO.
A-111991-15
ITEM NUMBER'""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Monthly Utility Billing Report
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~l ~,~,t,.a~' .
SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors has asked for a
report on monthly utility billing. The staff has reviewed several
alternatives to implement monthly billing and outlined the
advantages and disadvantages, and the cost in time and money of
each method. These choices are attached for your review and will
be discussed in greater detail during the worksession. All
commercial accounts are currently read and billed monthly.
Residential accounts are presently read and billed quarterly.
We currently offer monthly billing on an optional basis to
customers who request it. The customer can now estimate his next
bill and send us a check in the first and second month of his
reading cycle to reduce the amount remaining on the third month
when the bill is mailed. Since this requires manual processing,
this same method would not be feasible on a mandatory basis.
Cash flow should not be a major concern in the decision.
Utility collections stay within $60,000 per month, and much of that
difference can be attributed to usage variances. Of course there
would be a one-time initial influx of money during the first two
months when we are catching up with the last quarterly billings.
The sale of the water revenue bonds has placed new
restrictions on the water funds. Any budget amendments will need
to be submitted to the Trustee. In addition, cash flow has been
included in our bond documents. Any additions to the utility
budget will require a rate increase or a transfer from the general
fund. There are no excess funds in the utility budget to pay for
these increases.
As a part of the County-wide twenty position cutback, the
Utility Billing Department has eliminated one Account Clerk II
position this year. This leaves three people to handle all of the
billing, phone calls, problems, and new customers. With the added
strain from the rate increases, collection of utility consumer tax,
and credit for the elderly, this department has reached the maximum
level of work it can accomplish. A change to any of the monthly
billing alternatives would require that this position be reinstated
and the County cutback goal be reduced to nineteen positions.
/V-(n
The alternates reviewed by staff were:
1) Complete monthly billing - Monthly reading of all County
meters and monthly bills mailed
2) Meters read quarterly, mandatory estimated bills sent the
first two months of a cycle
3) Meters read quarterly, bills mailed quarterly with two
additional stubs to submit mandatory estimated payments
4) Optional monthly payment
5) Optional monthly budget payment plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would like to develop an optional
monthly billing plan (Method 4) to offer to the citizens. We would
like to have this plan in place as soon as possible, but no later
than July 1, 1992. In the meantime, customers may take advantage
of our current optional method of sending in monthly payments if
they choose. Additional costs will be included in the 1992-1993
budget. In addition, we would need to reinstate the previously
deleted Account Clerk II position which is funded in the current
budget.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
~ ~~~ ~~
Diane D. Hyat Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by:
Denied ( ) mntinn o ;mplement AlternativeEddy x
Received ( ) ~4 w;th no additional Johnson x
Referred ( ) i PrcnnnPl McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
2
/Y-L
Method 1: Complete Monthly Billing
(Monthly Reading of All County Meters)
Description
We currently read all residential meters on a quarterly basis
and commercial meters on a monthly basis. In order to read all
meters on a monthly basis, and do turn-offs for late payment on all
meters on a monthly basis, we would need to add five meter readers.
These meter readers would need a truck and computerized meter
reading equipment in order to do their job. In addition, we would
need five additional clerical positions (four new positions and the
reinstatement of one deleted position) in order to process monthly
bills, answer problems, process penalty notices and coordinate
turn-offs and turn-ons. In addition, postage expense would almost
triple and forms cost would increase. This large staff would not
fit into the current office space at the Administration Building,
so we would have to rent space elsewhere.
Advantages
1) The customer receives an accurate bill each month based
on his actual usage.
2) Leaks and other high usage factors can be detected
earlier.
3) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly
amounts rather than in large quarterly bills.
Disadvantages
1) Extremely expensive - additional cost would need to be
passed on to the customer.
2) Delinquencies would require more collection effort for a
larger number of bills with smaller amounts.
3) Space problems - there would not be enough office space
for the expanded operation.
4) Additional work for collections in the Treasurer's Office.
Additional Cost
5 Meter readers and equipment $198,564
4 Account clerks and equipment 85,801
Forms 3,700
Postage 60,000
Rent of office space 139,392
487 457
Based upon our projected annual water consumption of
1,800,000,000 gallons this would add $0.27 per thousand gallons to
the volume charge, and we would need to adjust the water rate
accordingly. A customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an
additional $16.20 per year for this service.
3
/V-lo
In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II
position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money
for this position is already in this year's budget and would not
require additional funds.
Implementation Time Required
In order to implement this method, we would need to hire
additional staff, find a new office location, order equipment and
forms, and make the necessary programming changes in the computer
software. It would require approximately four months to convert
to this method.
4
n-~
Method 2: Meters Read Quarterly, Mandatory Estimated Bills
Bent the First Tyro Months of a Cycle
Description
In this method, the meters would continue to be read
quarterly. However, all customers would receive a mandatory
estimated bill through the mail during the first month and the
second month of their reading cycle. During the third month, the
meter would be read and a bill sent to the customer showing the
usage and charge for the quarter, with a credit for payments made
on an estimated basis during the first two months. These estimated
bills would be based upon the usage from the previous quarter.
Since payment of estimates would be mandatory, this method
would require an additional meter reader to handle the turn-offs
from the monthly penalties. In addition, postage would increase
greatly because of monthly mailings to all customers. We would
need to reinstate the Account Clerk II position that was cut-back
during the year in order to handle the increased phone calls and
penalty notices. There would also be an increase in forms costs.
Advantages
1) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly
amounts rather than in a large quarterly bill.
Disadvantages
1) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter
bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer
may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is
too high.
2) Additional costs would need to be passed on to the
customer.
3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office.
Additional Cost
1 Meter reader and equipment $ 39,715
Forms 3,700
Postage 60,000
$103,415
Based upon our projected annual water consumption of
1,800,000,000 gallons this would add $0.06 per thousand gallons to
the volume charge, and we would need to adjust the water rate
accordingly. A customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an
additional $3.60 per year for this service.
In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II
position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money
for this position is already in this year's budget and would not
require additional funds.
5
/V-G
Implementation Time Required
In order to implement this method we would need to hire
additional staff, order equipment, and make the necessary computer
programming changes. It would take approximately three months to
convert to this method.
/' "~,
Method 3: Meters Read Quarterly, Bills Mailed Quarterly With Two
Additional Stubs to Submit Mandatory Estimated Payments
Description
This option is similar to Method 2, except that residential
accounts receive one mailing a quarter which includes their current
bill, and additional stubs to make mandatory estimated payments in
each of the next two months. With this method, we can save the
expense of monthly mailings to all customers. Postage will
increase some due to the heavier weight of the mailing.
We still need to add an additional meter reader position in
order to make monthly disconnections, and we need to reinstate the
Account Clerk II position to handle the monthly phone calls and
penalties.
Advantages
1) The customer may find it easier to pay in smaller monthly
amounts rather than in a large quarterly bill.
Disadvantages
1) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter
bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer
may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is
too high.
2) Additional costs would need to be passed on to the
customer.
3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office.
Additional Cost
1 Meter reader and equipment $39,715
Forms 3,700
Postage 20,000
63 415
Based upon our projected annual consumption of 1,800,000,000
gallons this would add $0.04 per thousand gallons to the volume
charge and we would need to adjust the water rate accordingly. A
customer using 5,000 gallons a month would pay an additional $2.40
per year for this service.
In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II
position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money
for this position is already in this year's budget and would not
require additional funds.
Implementation Time Required
In order to implement this method we would need to hire
additional staff, order forms and equipment, and make the necessary
computer programming changes. It would take approximately 4 months
to convert to this system. This method would take a little longer
to implement because we would have to design and order new forms.
7
~~°
Method 4: Optional Monthly Payment
Description
We currently offer optional monthly billing on a very limited
basis. When customers call in requesting it, we tell them that
they can estimate their own bill and make installment payments in
the first and second month of their reading cycle. These payments
must then be processed manually.
In order to advertise this service and increase the potential
use, we would recommend printing a message on the bills to contact
us if they would like to receive monthly billing. The customers
that have notified us would receive, with their quarterly bill, two
additional estimated bills to be remitted with their payment during
the next two months. In order to process large amounts of
payments, it is very important to have some type of remittance
advice sent in with the check.
Since the payments are optional, we will not need to process
penalties and make disconnections on a monthly basis, and
therefore, would not need an additional meter reader. The insert
bills would be sent without additional return envelopes to save on
postage.
Advantages
1) The customer can make
but it is not required,
2) Least expensive of the
monthly payments if he wants to,
monthly billing alternatives.
Disadvantages
i) Will require manual effort to match estimated bill
remittances with bills for mailing.
2 ) The estimated bills will be based on the previous quarter
bill. If that quarter is unreasonably high, the customer
may complain that the estimate for the next 2 months is
too high.
3) Additional work for collections in Treasurer's Office.
Additional Cost
Forms 3 700
The money for forms can be covered within the existing Utility
budget.
In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II
position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money
for this position is already in this year's budget and would not
require additional funds.
Implementation Time Required
In order to implement this method we would need to order forms
and make the necessary computer programming changes. It would take
approximately three months to convert to this system.
8
jlf-c.
Method 5: Optional Monthly Budget Paym®nt Plaa
Description
This option would work similar to the budget plans established
by electric and gas companies. If a customer desires to go on a
monthly budget plan he would contact the Utility Billing office to
sign up for the service. As part of the service, he will agree to
pay his utility bills on a monthly basis rather than a quarterly
basis. Utility Billing will then compute the customers average
bill based upon past history. The customer will then receive
monthly bills based upon the computed average. At least once a
year, the customers account will be adjusted to actual.
Advantages
1) The customer can make monthly payments on his bill.
Disadvantages
1) Once the customer signs up for budget payments, he must
make his payment on a monthly basis or his service will
be disconnected.
2) Additional work for collections in the Treasurer's Office.
Additional Cost
Forms
Postage
$ 3,700
10,000
$ 13,700
In addition, we would need to reinstate the Account Clerk II
position that we had deleted due to County wide cutbacks. Money
for this position is already in this year's budget and would not
require additional funds.
Implementation Time Required
This method would take the longest to preplan and to change
the software. We would like to allow six to seven months for
proper planning and testing of the conversion.
9
r
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~ r
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is the Youth Haven II Program Evaluation Report for the
period from 2/27/87 through 12/31/89.
Youth Haven II was officially open on February 27, 1987 and has
exceeded their program goals during that period.
~' ~' e `'
Elmer C. odge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) McGraw
To ( ) Nickens
Robers
yquth
HAV
~~~
Helping girls find their way home
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Board of Supervisors
,~ F1
FROM: Beverly T. Waldo, Director, Youth Haven II~~ ~"~
DATE: September 23, 1991
RE: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation
~~"
N-7
-~ - :~~~
It is with pleasure that I forward to you our Youth Haven II
Program Evaluation Report for the first 3 years of operation.
In this you will see that we have exceeded our program goals.
Many people have worked very hard to accomplish these very fine
results and we are all very proud of a job well done.
We hope that you will find this Report informative. If you have
any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel
free to call me at 563-4475.
BTW/krf
Enclosure
cc: John Chambliss
5929 Cove Road, N.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
(703) 563-4475
.,
r-~
YOUTH HAVEN II PROGRAM EVALUATION
2/27/87 - 12/31/89
~~~ N~?
I would like to thank the following staff members for their hard
work and dedication in persevering to produce this report. Claire
Alasio for data collection and co-authorship. Michael Metz for data
collection and analysis. Kim Farmer for typing numerous drafts before
producing the final product. And finally, to all of the Youth Haven II
staff for their ongoing support and understanding.
Beverly T. Waldo, MSW
Director
N-7
YOUTH HAVEN II PR0GRA~1 EVALUATION
2/27/87 - 12/31/89
INTRODUCTION
Youth Haven II was dedicated on December 14, 1986 and accepted its
first resident on February 27, 1987. Because it was a new program, it
was felt that Youth Haven II needed to be operational for at least
three years before there would be sufficient data collected to provide
a meaningful report. This is our first such report.
From its inception, Youth Haven II identified the following
measurable goals:
1) To provide a structured, community-based residential treatment
program for female adolescents in the Roanoke area;
2) To work intensively with each girl and her family so that she
may return home, where possible, and as soon as possible;
3) To offer a pre and post-dispositional placement option to the
Judges of the Juvenile Courts;
4) To prevent adjudication, before the courts, in 60~ of our
graduates during the first year after discharge; and
5) To improve social and personal adjustment, in at least 50~ of
our graduates, as documented through standardized testing.
The following is a presentation of narrative and statistical
information about the population served by Youth Haven II during the
calendar years 1987 through 1989. We have attempted to analyze whether
or not the preceding stated goals have been met.
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
Youth Haven II serves adolescent females between the ages of 12
and 18. The program was designed for an average length of stay of 6 to
8 months with a capacity of 12.
During the past 34 months, Youth Haven II served a total popula-
tion of 45 girls. In 1987 there were 10 residents, in 1988 there were
21, and in 1989 there were 29.1
Admissions data indicate that 10 girls in 1987, 13 girls in 1988,
and 22 girls in 1989 were admitted to the program. Discharges
(including emergency, discretionary, and graduation) numbered 2 in
1987, 14 in 1988, and 18 in 1989.
The average age for all residents, 1987-1989, was 15.35 years.
The frequency distribution of the resident's age upon admission is
presented in Table 1.
1 If one were to total these numbers, it would produce a
total greater than the stated total population of 45
residents. This inflated total reflects a number of cases in
which the length of a resident's placement overlaps from
one calendar year to the next. In such instances, the
resident was counted as having been served in both years.
n-~
2
TABLE 1
AGE AT TIME OF ADMISSION2
1987 1988 1989
12 0 0 0
13 1 1 4
14 2 4 4
15 4 2 9
16 0 5 4
17 3 1 0
n-~
Data on race reveal that in 1987 507 (n=5) of our residents were
Caucasian and 50~ (n=5) were African American. In 1988, 53~ (n=11)
were Caucasian, 43~ (n=9) African American, and 4~ (n=1) Other. During
1989, Caucasians comprised 62~ (n=18) of the population served, African
Americans 35~ (n=10), and 3~ (n=1) were Other.
Youth who came into placement were from either Roanoke City or
Roanoke County.3 Legal residence of the youth who came into placement
during this period is shown in Table 2.
2 The frequency distribution was derived from the
chronological age in years, excluding the months after the
resident's last birthday. The average age upon admission
for all residents was calculated using the chronological
age in years and months (since last birthday).
3 This does not necessarily mean that jurisdictions other
than Roanoke City or Roanoke County were not referring
cases. It may be that cases were referred, but found to
be inappropriate, or that cases were referred, found to be
appropriate, but no funding stream was available to effect
placement. (Youth Haven II did not become a Title XX
vendor until January, 1989.)
3
N-7
Roanoke County
Roanoke City
Salem City
Other
TABLE 2
LEGAL RESIDENCE OF YOUTH
1987 1988 1989
20~ (n=2) 19~ (n=4) 147 (n=4)
80~ (n=8) 81~ (n=17) 86~ (n=25)
0 0 0
0 0 0
Referrals came primarily from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations
Courts, Departments of Social Services, Sanctuary Crisis Intervention
Center (Other Agency), and in 1987, there was 1 parental referral.
Table 3 indicates the percentage breakdown of these referents.
TABLE 3
SOURCES OF REFERRAL
1987 1988 1989
Department of Social Services 60% (n=6) 47.6 (n=10) 27.6 (n=8)
J & D Court Service Un-its 30~ (n=3) 47.6 (n=10) 44.8 (n=13)
Other Agency 0 4.8~ (n=1) 27.6 (n=8)
Mental Health System 0 0 0
Parent 10~ (n=1) 0 D
TREATMENT SERVICES DELIVERED
Youth Haven II provides services to meet the basic needs of its
residents such as food, ongoing clothing, shelter, medical and dental
care, and personal care and grooming supplies. Clinical services are a
cornerstone of the program and include milieu therapy (primarily
composed of a combination of behavior modification, cognitive and RET
4
N7
therapies), structured study halls with tutorial assistance, an in-
house summer school program, individual, group, and family counseling,
Parent Support Group, recreational and leisure time activities, an
Aftercare program for program graduates, community meeting, and a
Drug/Alcohol Education Group (facilitated by Prevention Plus
personnel).
There were 232 formal4 individual counseling sessions held during
1987, 365 during 1988, and 323 during 1989. Formal Family Counseling
sessions occurred at the rate of 43 in 1987, 61 in 1988, and 59 in
1989. A total of 177 group sessions was held in 1987, 305 in 1988, and
178 in 1989. Table 4 summarizes the type and number of counseling
sessions that were held.
TABLE 4
THERAPEUTIC SERVICES
1987 1988 1989
Individual Counseling 232 365 323
Group Counseling Total = 177 205 178
Process Group 75 64 48
Basic Skills Group 43 43 43
Substance Abuse Group 0 24 17
Parent Group 24 26 22
Community Meeting 35 48 48
Family Counseling 43 61 59
Recreation/Leisure Activities 301 280 308
4 It is to be noted that the word "formal" is used to denote
prearranged and documented sessions. Numerous additional
counseling sessions routinely occur that are informal and
undoct.imented, unless significant material is revealed.
5
N7
During 1987, 301 recreational/leisure time activities were conducted,
208 occurred in 1988, and 308 in 1989.
Youth Haven II operates an Aftercare Program that is designed to
facilitate transition from the program to home. The Aftercare program
is available only to program graduates and their families and consists
of regular phone contacts and counseling sessions for up to three
months after discharge.
During 1987, Aftercare services were provided to the one graduate
for a period of three months; this included 12 individual telephone
contacts and 2. family counseling sessions. In 1988, 33~ of the
graduates (N=6) utilized the Aftercare program. Contact was maintained
for an average of 1.5 months and a total of 10 telephone contacts and
four family sessions were held. Aftercare services were provided to
33~ of the graduates (N=3) in 1989; in a period of two months, 8
telephone contacts were made and one family session was held.
OUTCOME DATA
Successful completion of the program implies improved social
functioning in the Youth Haven II graduate. Improved functioning is
also objectively measured through the use of standardized testing. The
Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale (designed to assess self-esteem and its
components) and the Jesness Inventory (a measure of delinquency) are
administered shortly after admission and, again, two weeks prior to
discharge.
6
N-7
Official standardized testing was not completed for those resi-
dents who graduated the program in 1987.5 Of those graduates served in
1988, only two completed pre and post-testing. One resident
demonstrated a significant increase in self-esteem; her pre-test score
fell in the 49th percentile and her post-test score fell in the 85th
percentile, reflecting a 73~ increase in the self-esteem measure. No
significant difference was reflected in the self-esteem scores for the
second graduate. No significant changes were noted in the delinquency
indices for either graduate.6 All graduates tested in 1989 (N=3)
demonstrated dramatic increases in self-esteem scores; initial scores
fell between the 10th and 20th percentile and final scores ranged
between the 75th and 95th percentile, representing an average of 300
increase in self-esteem scores. Significant decreases in delinquency
scores were also noted for all graduates; there was an average decrease
of 32~ in delinquency scores for all graduates.
Although non-graduates complete standardized testing in the
initial days of placement, post-tests are rarely administered due to
the unplanned nature of discretionary discharges. It is assumed,
however, that non-graduates receive some benefit from simply being in
the program for any given length of time. This assertion is quantified
through the use of adjudicatory records; a non-graduate is thought to
have demonstrated improved functioning if they have not been
5 Implementation of pre and post testing of the Piers-
Harris Self-Concept Scale and the Jesness Inventory was official-
ly begun by the Department of Corrections in July, 1987.
6 A significant increase or decrease in delinquency and
self-esteem measures is defined as, at least, a 10~ change in the
value of the score.
7
N7
adjudicated within one year of discharge from Youth Haven II. The
adjudicatory data for non-graduates is presented in Table 5.
TABLE 5
ADJUDICATORY STATUS (NON-GRADUATES)
Year Not
Served Adjudicated Adjudicated
1987 1 0
(n=1) (100) 0
1988 5 4
(n=9) (56~) (44~)
1989 8 7
(n=15) (53~) (47~)
Total N=25 14 11
(56~) (44~)
The data indicate that of the total of non-graduates served in the
period between 1987 and 1989 (N=25), 44~ (n=11) were not adjudicated
within one year of discharge.
Adjudicatory data is also compiled for program graduates. Of the
10 residents successfully completing the program between 1987 and 1989,
eight (80~) were not adjudicated within one year of graduation from
Youth Haven II; the remaining two graduates were adjudicated for Grand
Larceny. Table 6 summarizes the adjudicatory status data for program
graduates.
8
. ~ _ ~~
TABLE 6
ADJUDICATORY STATUS (GRADUATES)
Year Not
Served Adjudicated Adjudicated
1987 (n=1) 0 1 (1000
1988 (n=6) 2 (33~) 4 (67~)
1989 (n=3) 0 3 (100%)
Total N=10 2 (20%) 8 (80%)
When examining where residents have been placed after discharge,
we find that in 1987, all residents (N=2) were returned home. In 1988,
9 of 14 residents discharged (64%) remained with their families and 5
residents (36%) went on to other placements. Of those residents
discharged in 1989 (N=18), 12 (67%) returned home; alternative living
arrangements were secured for the remaining 6 (33%) residents. The
types of post-discharge placements and the frequency distribution of
residents entering such placements are summarized in Table 7.
TABLE 7
POST DISCHARGE PLACEMENTS
1987 1988 1989
Home 2 (100%) 9 (64%) 12 (67%)
Other placement 0 5 (36%) 6 (33%)
Foster Care 0 1 (7%) 0
In-patient 0 0 1 (6%)
DOC/DYES 0 1 (7%) 4 (22%)
Long-ter.m residential 0 2 (14%) 1 (6%)
Independent living 0 0 0
Other 0 1 (7%} 0
9
n-~
SUMMARY
Youth Haven II came into existence in order to provide a community
based residential treatment facility for adolescent females in the
Roanoke Valley. The intent was to provide a structured therapeutic
environment for youth, and adjunctive services to their families, in
order to make possible the youth's return to her family. Treatment
objectives were established concerning improved social functioning as a
result of being in placement. It was proposed that at least 60~ of our
program graduates would not be adjudicated within one year of gradua-
tion. Additionally, 50~ of the graduates would exhibit improved social
and personal adjustment, as documented by testing.
In conclusion, it has been found that in addition to the provision
of basic services, (e.g., food, shelter, medical, and dental care),
extensive therapeutic services are provided by Youth Haven II, both
during and after placement. The intensive nature of these services has
made it possible for 67~ of all residents discharged (N=34) to return
dome. When examining what happens to residents after they leave the
program, we find that 80~ of all graduates are not adjudicated within
one year of graduation and 44~ of all non-graduates were not adjudi-
cated within one year of discharge. Standardized testing data reveals
that 91~ of graduates tested demonstrated dramatic increases in self-
esteem measures and 80~ of the graduates tested demonstrated
significant decreases in the delinquency measure. Consideration of
these data warrants the conclusion that Youth Haven II has clearly met
and/or exceeded its programmatic goals and objectives.
10
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Report on the status of the proposed noise ordi-
nance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY'
On May 20, 1991 The City Council for the City of Roanoke
adopted a "Noise Control" Ordinance. As a result of this action
the Board of Supervisors directed the County Atorney to report to
the Board on this ordinance after six months of its application.
BACKGROUND'
All parties realize the inadequacy of the County's existing
ordinance to address the common types of noise nuisances that
detract from the quality of life in an urban and suburban environ-
ment. Over the past six years citizen complaints have increased as
staff has researched various appoaches to resolve these problems.
Practical problems of enforceability and definition (how loud
is loud?) and constitutional concerns with First Amendment "free
speech" considerations have raised significant legal hurdles to an
effective local ordinance. These problems include the cost of
equipment to measure the duration, intensity and frequency of
sound.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This office is seeking the comments of Wilburn C. Dibling,
Jr., City Attorney, and Donald C. Caldwell, Commonwealth's Attorney
for Roanoke City, concerning the application and enforcement of the
City's noise ordinance. I am in the process of contacting experts
at Virginia Tech for their comments and assistance, as well as
coordinating a draft ordinance through the County's Public Safety
Team. I anticipate submitting a recommendation and a draft
ordinance to the Board within the next 2 or 3 months.
1
lY-8
Respectfully submitted,
~-`'^~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
c:\wp51\agenda\code\noise.:pt
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Vote
No Yes Abs
2
r ~ t
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER I Y "
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority
1990/91 Audit
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is the 1991 audit for the Industrial Development
Authority.
The audit was performed by Brown, Edwards and Company and has been
sent to the State Auditor of Public Accounts.
~..
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) McGraw
To ( ) Nickens
Robers
r
{ v ~
t '
I
LAW' OFFICES
OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE ' d
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S W.
CHARLES H. OSTERHOU DT P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE
MICHAEL S. FERGUSON
EDWARD A. NATT
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
703-774-1197
MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018 FAX NO.
G. STEVEN AGEE 703-774-0961
MARK D. KIDD
November 3, 1991
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find the audit for the Industrial Development
Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 1991. Copies have been provided to each member of the
Authority and also to the appropriate state agencies as required by
law. Should there be any questions concerning the audit or other
activities of the Authority, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT,
AHERON & AGEE, P.C.
~Q ~~ ~
Edward A. Natt
EAN/dle
Enclosure
c: Mr. Tim Gubala
~~~
I au .~r, ict ~
OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W
CHARLES H. OSTERHOVDT P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE
MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON
VIRGINIA
ROANOKE
703-774-1197
EDWARD A. NATT ,
MICHAEL J. AHERON 24OI S FAx NO.
G. STEVEN AGEE 703.774-0961
MARK D. KIDD
November 3, 1991
Auditor, Public Accounts
Commonwealth of Virginia
James Monroe Building
101 N. 14th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Re: Industrial Development Authority
of Roanoke County, Virginia
Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find a financial report for the Industrial
Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia dated June 30,
1991. , ,
Should there be any questions, please advise.
With best personal regards, I am,
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT,
AHEROPI & AGEE , P . C .
Edward A. Natt
EAN/dle
Enclosure
c: Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County
~.~ Ea1~r uY.Y~
N~~
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
FINANCIAL REPORT
June 30, 1991
~tc~'`.
- Er~uaEUr~
CLk1I#~Y
n-ti
OFFICERS
Charles R. Saul, Chairman
Tim Gubala, Secretary
Edward A. Natt, Treasurer
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Billy H. Branch Richard Cranwell
Ron Martin J. Carson Quarles
W. Darnell Vinyard Wayne Dunman
U~~~
Eu~~a[
Ccx~~w
/Y-~
C O N T E N T S
Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 4
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance Sheets 5
Statements of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balance 6
Notes to Financial Statements 7
~'"'
D
^ haw
D ^ C:o~Ar~
Certified Public Accountants
Tennessee • Virginia • West Virginia
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Members of the Board of Supervisors
and Board of Directors
Industrial Development Authority
Roanoke County, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of the Industrial
Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, as of June 30, 1991 and 1990,
and the related statements of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund
balance for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the management of the Industrial Development Authority of
Roanoke County, Virginia. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Industrial
Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, at June 30, 1991 and 1990,
and the results of its operations in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
~ ~ L~
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Roanoke, Virginia
September 26, 1991
Member: SEC and Private Companies Practice Sections of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Associated Regional Accounting Firms
- P~a~~
Er~~r~u~
: Ccx~mruvv
N-9
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 1991 and 1990
ASSETS
Cash
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Total liabilities
FUND BALANCE
Page S
1991 1990
S 4.519 S 4.425
S 4.519 S 4,425
S - S 500
- 500
4,519 3,925
S 4,519 S 4,425
The Notes to Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
13RCx~
- Et~~n[ur
~ CL~4~.titi'
~~
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND
` CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Years Ended June 30, 1991 and 1990 Page 6
1991 1990
REVENUES
Application fees
Processing and closing fees
Audit fees
Total revenues
EXPENDITURES
Directors' fees
Professional fees
Total expenditures
Excess of revenues over expenditures
FUND BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR
$ 250 $ 900
1,144 -
1,112 1,527
2.506 2.427
800 750
1,112 1,085
1.912 1,835
594 592
3.925 3.333
S 4.519 ~ 3,925
The Notes to Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
H~a~~ ._
: Cl~t~,`1~
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 1991 Page 7
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies
A. Purpose
The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, was created
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County on August 11, 1971, pursuant to
Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended (Industrial
Development and Revenue Bond Act). It is a political subdivision of the
Commonwealth of Virginia. The Authority promotes industry and develops trade
by encouraging manufacturing, industrial, governmental, and commercial
enterprises to locate or remain in Roanoke County. The Authority issues low-
interest, tax-free industrial revenue bonds to acquire and improve property
and equipment which is then sold or leased to the enterprise at terms
necessary to retire the financing.
B. Basis of Accountine
The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the Authority. Under
the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when
received. Expenditures are recorded when the liability is incurred.
C. Limitation of Liability
The Authority has issued revenue bonds and notes to acquire and finance
improvements of property and equipment which are immediately sold or leased.
The notes and bonds, as to principal and interest, are payable solely from
lease payments or payments on notes receivable. The long-term leases are
essentially sales agreements as the lessees have a bargain purchase option to
acquire the property at the expiration of the lease. The Authority does not
reflect in its accounts any ownership in the properties. If the lessee or
note makers default, the holders do not have recourse from the Authority but
must obtain indemnity from the lessee, note maker or by sale of the property.
Bonds and notes issued pursuant to the provisions of the Industrial
Development and Revenue Bond Act are not deemed to constitute a debt of the
Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof and are guaranteed by the
Authority only to the extent of revenues and other security pledged under the
terms of the individual agreements. However, the Authority and the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, may choose at their option to assume responsibility for
the debt issues in the event of default to preserve the credit rating of the
Authority for future issues.
Note 2. Revenue Bonds and Notes
As of June 30, 1991, the Authority has issued and outstanding $37, 680, 770 of
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds and Notes, pursuant to Chapter 33, Title 15.1
of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. These debt issues are not included
in the accompanying financial statements since the Authority is not liable for
their repayment, as discussed in Note 1.
(Continued)
- EU~:aan~S~
Ccx~ti~vt'
JV-9
Page 8
Balance
June 30. 1991
$ 341,702
834,378
393,486
99,639
109,266
129,236
3,312,326
1,665,000
505,000
3,320,000
395,000
8,510,000
400,000
388,204
308,274
297,000
65,665
1,718,800
7,881
166,326
259,163
95,237
138,652
965,188
760,000
356,591
1,198,454
3,870,000
433,877
427,235
691,190
708,000
3,000,000
1,450,000
360.000
Type of Project
Truck Sales and Service Facilities
Egg Production Facility
Plant Facility
Restaurant
Medical Facilities
Real Estate and Professional
Hotel
Hospital Center
Manufacturing Plant
Nursing Home
Hospital Center
Hospital and Residential Care
Freight Terminals
Restaurant
Office Building
Health Center Facility
Manufacturing Facility
Warehouse and Office Facility
Office Building
Office Building
Office Building
Feed Mill
Office Building
Office and Shopping Center
Mini-Warehouse Facility
Storage Building
Medical Office
Refunding 1982 Bond
Office Building
Office Building
Egg Production Facility
Office Building
Gymnasium
Office Facility
Center
Retail Shopping Center Facility
Office Building
~ 37.680.770
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER (J ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Work Session - Water Treatment Plant
BACKGROUND:
The Spring Hollow Water Project includes the construction of the
Spring Hollow Reservoir, a Water Treatment Plant and water
transmission lines. The Board of Supervisors have previously
approved the concept plan for the reservoir and transmission lines.
During this work session, staff will present alternative concept
plans for the water treatment facilities.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
During the Work Session, staff will discuss the water quality of
the Roanoke River and how it relates to treatment processes.
Staff will present three concept plans for a water treatment
facility. The three alternatives are construction of a water
treatment plant along Route 460, 2000 feet northwest of the
reservoir; construction of a water treatment plant at Glenvar on
the "Allied" site; and upgrade of the City of Salem Water Treatment
Plant located in Glenvar. All three concepts will fully comply
with the conditions of the permit issued to construct the Spring
Hollow Reservoir as it related to use of water from the Roanoke
River.
A method for handling the design and construction of the water
treatment plant will be discussed with the Board. Possible design
methods available range from awarding a full design/construction
management contract to one engineering firm, similar to the way
Spring Hollow Reservoir was done, to design/construction management
by County personnel similar to the way water and sewer projects
have been done for the last four years.
As a result of this Work Sessions., the Board will provide direction
to staff for the concept and design of the water treatment
facility.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~~ ~~
~~ ~ ~~
Cliffor ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
o-~
WORK SESSION
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
WATER QUALITY
The Virginia Water Control Board maintains a water quality
monitoring station on the Roanoke River at the Lafayette Gauging
Station. This station is just downstream of where the North and
South Fork combine to from the Roanoke River. The results of the
testing period ending May 31, 1991 are included in this report as
Attachment #l.
Due to the low number of parameters tested for by the Water Control
Board, staff hired an independent testing laboratory to collect
water samples and test for all contaminants listed in the Safe
Drinking Water Act, all contaminants proposed for listing in the
Safe Drinking Water Act, and all contaminants listed as Priority
Pollutants by the USEPA. A total of 178 items were tested for.
The results of these tests are included as Attachment #2.
Samples were also collected and tested for total and fecal
coliform. Nineteen samples have been collected since October 7 and
sampled for coliform. Copies of the coliform tests are included
as Attachment #3. The geometric mean of the nineteen daily samples
taken is 440/100m1 total coliform and 135/100m1 fecal coliform.
The section of the Roanoke River where the Spring Hollow Reservoir
intake pump station is located is classified as a Natural Trout
stream. The water quality required for classification as a Natural
Trout stream is higher than the water quality that is maintained
for a river section that has been classified as a Public Water
Supply.
The above information is provided to document
the water that is proposed to be used as a raw
water treatment plant.
the high quality of
water source for a
November 14, 1991
t
TREATMENT PLANT
The water treatment plant that is proposed to provide treated water
for Roanoke County will be selected to meet the following criteria:
1. Meet all requirements of the Surface Water Treatment Rule and
the Virginia Waterworks Regulations.
2. Be capable of treating water to meet all existing MCL's as
well as MCLG's for possible contaminants.
3. Construct at least cost to our residents and customers.
4. Treatment process that uses minimum possible energy.
5. Treatment process that uses minimum amount of chemicals and
has minimum chemical carry over into finished water.
6. Treatment process using minimum moving parts in order to
reduce energy requirements and maintenance.
7. Treatment process that produces minimum amount of sludge and
wastewater.
8. Treatment process with minimum in-plant time to reduce by-
product generation and minimize plant size.
9. Treatment process that can be easily expanded without
interfering with existing plant operation.
SITE SELECTION
The cost to construct a water treatment plant is based on the
quality of the raw water. Therefore, the cost to construct a
treatment plant at differing locations will vary by the cost of
land and site work. The cost of operating a treatment plant at
differing locations increases as the plant elevation decreases.
The construction and operating costs for a Salem, Glenvar or West
options are presented in tabular form on the following pages.
November 14, 1991
•
COST COMPARISON FOR ALTERNATIVE
TREATMENT PLANT SITES
SALEM BENDIX WEST
PLANT WATER SOURCE ELEVATION 1055'
~91' 1075'
>125' 1150'
>260'
PLANT INLET ELEVATION 1146' 1200' 1410'
PLANT FINISH WATER ELEVATION 1090'
>410' 1144'
'356' 1314'
'186'
TRANSMISSION STORAGE ELEVATION 1500 1500 1500
TOTAL STATIC HEAD -SOURCE/STORAGE 501' 481' 446'
BASIC COST PER MILLION GALLON PUMPED $125.25 $120.25 $111.5
~ ADD PER MILLION GALLON - DYNAMIC HEAD
5 MGD
$3.00
$3.00
$3.00
10 MGD $6.00 $6.00 $6.00
15 MGD $12.75 $12.75 $12.75
25 MGD $33.25 $33.25 $33.25
USING THE ABOVE FINISH WATER COST AND ADDING RAW WATER PUMPING COST AND
RIVER AUGMENTATION COST, THE ACTUAL TOTAL ANNUAL PUMPING COST FOR
HISTORICAL RIVER FLOWS WOULD BE:
SALEM BENDIX WEST
AVERAGE RIVER FLOW - 10 MGD DEMAND $594,791 $561,124 $480,732
AVERAGE RIVER FLOW - 17 MGD DEMAND $975,665 $920,439 $806,088
30 YEAR LOW RIVER FLOW - 17 MGD DEMAND $986,762 $930,908 $794,595
ADDITIONAL COST FOR SITES:
INLET PIPING
PUMP BACK LINE
RAW PUMP STATION
PRE-SETTLEMENT BASIN OR
ADDITIONAL PROCESS UNITS
SECOND TRANSMISSION PUMP STATION
LAN D
$50,000
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$450,000 $450,000
$100,000 $440,000
$200,000 ~
$1,280,000 ~
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST $2,550,000 $2,940,000 $1,480,000
OKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT
ROAN NOV. 14, 19911
D
O ~
z z
,~
O D
~ ~ ~ i ~
~, Z
~ N~
~ %` --~
~,
(n D
l l ~ ~ ~
m
rn
C -I
~ ~°
z ~ mpg ~
--~ N Z ~~
m ~
C ~ <_
-~ (T1 °- °
r D ~ t
fTl
~ ~ o
~ I 1 ~ ,~
~ -o ~ N
~ D
D
~ rn ~ m
~ z
~ RIVER
z c~
-~ _~
Nla i~ynQW ~u~d ~ m D ~
~< T`~
m~
I~
o ^
° v a
° ~
0
Dn
~n
Cn
0
D
~ ~
a? N
rn
~ ~ o
~ O
z D
z
D O
~ fTl ~ m
~ 2 ~
~ O o ~,
~ C ~ m
f
Tl Z -~
~J ~ ~
m
~ ~
~7 C
fTl ~ w
~ ~
~ ~ m
fTl z
z
~
o
s
~ D ~
z --~
~ ~ o 0 0 0 0
~ z o 0 0 0 0
~ ~
r-J, N
J
-~
O N
~
Z D ~
~~
< ~ ~ ~
m
-~
cp o
c1i
~ ~ ~
ATTACHMENT N0. 1
May 13, 1991 Lafayette Gauging Station VaWCB
NO 2 as N Total 0.010 mg/1
Un-ioned NH, as NH, 0.001 mg/1
NO 3 as N Total 0.457 mg/1
Total KJEL as N 0.313 mg/1
Phos-Total as P 0.146 mg/1
Phos-Dis Ortho as P 0.048 mg/1
Total Organic as C 2.000 mg/1
Total Hardness as C~CO, 155.290 mg/1
Chloride Total 19.046 mg/1
Fluoride as F Total 0.139 mg/1
Silica Dissolved 8.464 mg/1
Arsenic Total As 10.000 ug/1
Cadmium Total CD 13.750 ug/1
Chromium Total CR 10.000 ug/1
Copper Total CU 10.000 ug/1
Iron Total FE 135.000 ug/1
Lead Total PB 10.000 ug/1
Manganese MN 8.666 ug/1
Nickel Total NI 10.000 ug/1
Zinc Total Zinc 9.25 ug/1
Mercury Total HG 0.300 ug/1
ATTACHMENT N0. 2
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
LABORA?ORV DiR Er?OR
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, YIR(iINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814) 333-1468 FAX: (703) 382-1883
KENNETH G. HART
LA80RA?ORV DIREC?GR
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
11/01/91
TO: RtOANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATTN: MR. SCOTP AGNF~t
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SAL,Eri VA 29153 AOOOLIN'P N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PACE 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RDGEIVID: 08/28/91
----------------------------------------------------
pp'gt RESULTS UNITS
Cyanide (distillation)
<0.005 MG/L
Fluoride (distilled)
~'
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Nitrite
Sulfate
Asbestos (by TEM) °
Asbestos (by TEM) °
Arsenic (flameless)
Mercury
Selenium (flameless)
Radium 226
Radium 228
0.4
0.28
<0.05
30
0
0
<0.0005
<0.0001
<0.0005
<0.5
3+/-1
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MSL
NG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
pCi/L
* This analysis was performed by CEP, Inc., I.D. #N!s-CEP-AN-13.
° This analysis was performed by Structure Probe, NVLAP 1780.
---------------------------
DATE AND ANALYST
09/04/91 HEID/
WALTERS
09/11/91 PEARSUN
08/29/91 HANAUII2
08/29/91 HANAUER
09/03/91 LESSICK
09/10/91
09/06/91
09/05/91
10/10/91
KOZAKOVSKY
KOZAKOVSKY
PEPHTEL
~ Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
U_ ~blic Heath Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dept. of Apricuture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ,~.~r,,,,,i Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ',
- - - J
FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC.
7 ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIR(i1N1A 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 2dS-2544 KENNETH G. HART
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
FAX: (814) 333-1486 FAX: (703) 362-1683 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
11/01/91
~: ROANOICE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AQ1ER
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
gAjp4 VA 24153 AOOOUNT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL
----- REPORT FORM
----------------- PAIGE 2
------------
------------------
-----------------------------
SAMPLE ID ---------
RQANOKE
RIVIIt
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RF7CEIVID: 08/28/91
--
-----------------
------------
-----------------
------------------------------
pAgp~~ ------------
RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST
Uranitan * <0.001 MG/L 10/10/91
Radon * 12+/-8 pCi/L 10/10/91
Dibromomethane <0.005 MG/L 09/03/91 BEERS
2,6-Dichlorophenol <0.010 MG/L 09/10/91 HANS/
BOLARD
Dioxin SEE NOTE 09/10/91 HAMS/
BOLARD
Acid Digestion Preparation ODI~~LETE 09/03/91 9CHMiITT
2,4-D <0.00005 MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) <0.00005 MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH
* This analysis was performed by CEP, Inc., I.D. #NM-CEP-AN-13.
MOTE: The compound Dioxin, (2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) was not found in the
sample based on GC/MS screen according to Method 625.
>. Atxreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Heath Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
ublic Hsalth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Heath 6 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA O.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Apricuture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Heath Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~.~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC. ~• RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
L ABORATQRV DIRECTOR
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRQINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 KENNETH G. HART
LABORA T09v DIRECTOR
FAX: (814) 333-1488 FAX: (703) 382-1883 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
11/01/91
~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATTN: MR. SOOTP AGNER
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153 AOOOUNT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RECEIVID: 08/28/91
----------------------------------------------------
pp~Z~ RESULTS UNITS
BERBICIDES 5 INSECTICIDES
Ala or <0.0002 MG/L
Atrazine <0.0005
Butachlor <0.0001
Dalapon <0.00005
Dinoseb <0.00003
Diquat <0.001
Endothall <0.03
Glyphosate <1.0
Metribuzin <0.00002
Pichloram <0.00005
Propachlor <0.00006
Simazine <0.001
Metolafhlor <0.0002
* This analysis was performed by Aqua Tech, I.D. #34-126-4065.
DATE AND ANALYST
10/15/91
Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42'70)0
PA O.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dept. of Apricufture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ;°~',..:: Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.t.=WILL FOLLOW
_ _ _
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O.80X 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIR(iiNIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814) 333-1488 FAX: (703) 382-1883
11/01/91
~: RQA[VOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATTN : MR . SCOTT AIQ~~t
1206 KFSSLIIt MILL RD.
~,~ VA 24153 A(JOOUNT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
SAMPLE ID RaANO~c>;
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DIATE RDC~IVED: 08/28/91
p~ RESULTS UNITS
INSECTICIDES 6 HERBICIDES
05 MG/L
<0
apt a .
Aldicarb <0.05
Aldicarb Sulfone <0.05
Aldicarb Sulfoxide <0.05
Carbaryl <0.05
Carbofuran <0.05
Di (2-ethylhexyl) ~ipate <0.002
Epichlorohydrin <0.002
Methamyl <0.05
Vydate <0.05
3-Hydroxycarbofuran <0.05
* This analysis was performed by Aqua Tech, I.D. #34-126-4065.
PAGE 4
J. RICHARD WONIER, Ph.D.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
L1ATE AMID ANALYST
10/15/91
A. Axreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
~, 'ubllc Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Hsafth Laboratory LD. No. 10552 7!`"lLu~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 7023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < -LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
~tl
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883
11/01/91
TO: ROIANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNER
1206 KFSSLER MILL RD.
SALE]~i VA 24153
P.O. M
AOGOUIPP N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVF~2
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE REX;EIVED: 08/28/91
-----------------------------------------------------------
pAgp~~~ RESiJLTS UNITS
UNRDGIJLATID VOC
Ethylene Dibramide <0.00002 MG/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.00002
PAGE 5
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
_aPpaar~r~-~ "'OR
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
~_necaa-_•~~~ o,FecToa
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
DATE AND ANALYST
09/04/91 LEMISH
~' .Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
l1. ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboretory 1.0. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection lab I.D. No. '7613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. Of Health Laboretory LD. No. 10552 •'°" Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
._
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 16335 ROANOKE, VIR(31NIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1486 FAX: (703)362-1883
11/01/91
~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATPN: MR. SCOTT A~
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SAI,Eht VA 24153 AIOOOUNT NO. 01925
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM P1~GE 6
---------------------------------
SAMPLE ID
LAB ID
DATE RDL~IVID:
----------------------------------
PA~RAMEZTR
SEMI-VOLATILE B
Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodi-N-propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic Acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene
----------------
ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
10828704
08/28/91
RESULTS UNITS
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.002
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.050
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.002
<0.010
<0.010
MG/L
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
'_APORn?ORV DiREC?OR
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
..~BOR4'ORV OiR EC70R
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
DAATE AND ANALYST
09/10/91 HAMS/
BOLARD
`! A. Accreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
`~ ?ublic Hsatth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health b Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Em. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1486 FAX: (703)382-1863
11/01/91
~: F~OIANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. Y
ATTN : MR . SCOTT A(~t
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SAT,,~i VA 24153 ACOOUNT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LAB ID
DATE RDCEIVID:
---------------------------------
PARAME'PER
SAMPLE ID
ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
10828704
08/28/91
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
_ABORATORV DIRECTOR
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
DATE AND ANALYST
SEMI-VOLATILE COMPWNDS Continued
9-Chloro-3-methylphenol tpara-chlor
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
r 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-(~loronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
9,6-Dintro-2-methylphenol
N-n i trostxl i phenylalni ne
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
RESULTS UNITS
<0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.010
<0.002
<0.050
<O.OOZ
<0.002
<0.050
<0.002
<0.030
<0.030
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.050
<0.010
<0.010
<0.002
<0.002
MG/L
09/10/91 HAMS/
BOLARD
.Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
l~ ~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Labwratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboretory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Faality
NV Oept. of Heakh Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~^°~^~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC. J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
7 LABORA70RV ~iRECTOR
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (7'03) 265-2544 KENNETH G. HART
~_ABORArORV CiR EC7CR
FAX: (814) 333-1466 FAX: (703) 382-1883 p0AN0KE, VIRGINIA
11/01/91
~~ RQANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. ~
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGiVII2
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153 AQOOIJMP N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 8
-------------------------------------------
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RECEIVED: 08/28/91
PARAMETER RESULTS
SEMI-VOLATILE ~OLMDS Continued
Pentachlorophenol <0.010
Phenanthrene <0.002
Anthracene <0.002
Di-n-butylphthalate <0.002
Fluoranthene <0.002
Pyrene <0.002
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate <0.002
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine <0.010
Benzo(a)anthracene <0.002
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate <0.002
Chrysene <0.002
Di-n-octyl Phthalate <0.002
Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.002
Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.002
Benzo(a)pyrene <0.002
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.002
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.005
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.002
UNITS DATE AND ANALYST
MG/L 09/10/91 HAMS/
BOLARD
A. Accrodttation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
~~, _ rubliC Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dept. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~yc Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW ~
I
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (T03) 285-2544
~ FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883
m
11/01/91
~: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DBPT P.O. ~
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AC1dER
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153 ACCaMT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PACE 9
SAI~LE ID
LAB ID
DATE RDC~IVID:
---------------
PARAME~'ER
WLATILE CX~POUNDS
Chloromethane
Bromocnnethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethenes tTotal)
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichloropzopane
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
RoANOxE
RIVER
08/28/91
10828704
08/28/91
----------------
RFSULTS UNITS
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.10
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
MG/L
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
~ABOAn'~ar c~a E_r~a
MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
neoaaroav o~aECToa
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
DATE AND ANALYST
09/03/91 BEERS
A. Axreditatfon No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
'<. 'ublic Hsalth Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA O.E.R. Laborarory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NV Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 '-'y.w; Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f =WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883
11/01/91
~~ ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AIQ~t
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALDri VA
P.O. M
24153 AOOOUN'P N0. 01925
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 10
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
LABORATORY DIREC?OR
MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
'~ABORATORv DIRECTOR
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
SAMPLE ID RI'JAPIOKE
RIVER
08/28/91 -
LAB ID 10828704
DATE REiL'EIVID: 08/28/91
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pp,~~TER RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST
VOLATILE OOMPOUNDS Continued
Benzene <0.005 MG/L 09/03/91 BEERS
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.005
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether <0.010
Bromoforn- <0.005
2-Hexanone <0.050
4-Methyl-2-pentanone <0.050
Tetrachloroethene <0.005
Toluene <0.005
Chlorobenzene <0.005
Ethylbenzene <0.005
Styrene <0.005
Total Xylenes <0.005
4. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Heefth Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
Ie_ ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. LD. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboretory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Heahh Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 N"?v~ Natl. Voluntary lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < -LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (703) 265-2544
FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)362-1663
11/01/91
TO: ROAAIOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT
ATTN : MR . SCOTT AIGt~~t
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
~,~ VA 24153
PARAMETER
PESTICIDES ~ PCB'S
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4,4'-DDT
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDD
Dieldrin
alpha-Endosulfan
beta-Et~dosulfan
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
IIzdrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor Epoxide
Heptachlor
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCS-1248
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0004
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
MG/L 09/09/91 LEMISH
4. Accreditation No. 96 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
,~. 'ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dept. of Agriculture Approved Oairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 =`•'~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface MiNng Approved Facility
NY Dept. o} Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.t. =WILL FOLLOW
P.O. IR
AOCOL)NT N0. 01425
J. RICHARD WOHLER,Ph.D.
_ABORA'nav GiR~C'OR
MEADVILLE. PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
~ABORATOR~ DiR _C-OR
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE it
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE R~CEIVID: 08/28/91
RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST
FREE•COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1488 FAX: (703)382-1883
11/01/91
~~ ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT
ATTN: I4Et. SCO`1T AGNER
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
~,~•~ VA 24153
P.O. ~
ACOOiJDTP N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
SAt~LE ID RQANOKE
RiVFR
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RDGEIVED: 08/28/91
-----------------------------------------------------------
pT~g RESULTS UNITS
PESTICIDES ~ PCB'S CONTINOED
PCB-12 4 <0.001 MG/L
PCB-1260 <0.001
PAIGE 12
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
_ABORA70RV DiREC70R
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
~ABORA70RV DtREC70R
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
---------------------------
DATE AND ANALYST
09/09/91 LEMISH
i A. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
rublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Ern., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of ApricuRure Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Hsekh Laboretory LD. No. 10552 ~''lu1;o' Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Em. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: <=LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
I
FREE-COL LABORATORIES INC. J. RICHARD WOHLER,Ph.D.
s _aeaan ri: Av ~„aec-o5
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD MEADVILLE.. PENNSYLVANIA
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544 KENNETH G. HART
FAX: (814) 333-1486 FAX: (703) 382-1883 ROANOKE VIRGINIA
11/01!91
Tn: ROANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT
ATTN : MR . SCOTT' A~
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153
P.O. ~
ACCOUNT N0. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVFR
DIGESTION
LAB ID 10828705
DATE RECEIVID:
------- 08/28/91
-----------
-------------
----------------------------
pA,Rp,METER RESULTS UNITS
Altanintan (flameless) 0.214 S MG/L
Antimony (flameless) <0.010 MG/L
Barium (flameless) 0.070 S MG/L
Beryllium <0.03 MG/L
Cadmiiali <0.01 MG/L
Chromium (flameless) 0.001 MG/L
Copper <0.02 MG/L
Lead (flameless) 0.002 S MG/L
Molybdenum <0.1 MG/L
Nickel <0.04 MG/L
PAGE 13
----------------------------
----------------------
DATE AND ANALYST
11/01/91 BAKER
09/11/91 BAKER/
WESTON
10/31/91 BAKER
09/09/91 PRUTZMAN
09/04/91 LIM
10/28/91 BAKER
09/04/91 LIM
10/24/91 BAKER/
09/04/91 LIM
09/04/91 LIM
/ 1. Axredltation No. 913 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
C.. ublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory t.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env.. Health 8 Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Agriculture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Faality
NY Dept. o} Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ,^`=:,u~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-6242 PHONE: (703) 285-2544
FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)362-1863
11/01/91
~~ F'OANOKE CO. UTILITY DEPT P.O. M
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNER
1206 KESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153 AG'COUNT N0. 01425
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
'_ABORATORY D~REC?OR
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
J+BORATORV D~REC?OR
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
------------------------------- PAGE 14
----------------------
------------------ -----------
SAMPLE ID ROANOKE
RIVER
DIGESTION
LAB ID 10828705
DATE RDCEIVID: 08/28/91
----
--
------
---------------
----------------------
-------------------
PAFiAMETER~I' -------------
-
-
RESULTS UNITS DATE AND ANALYST
Silver (flameless) <0.0002 MG/L 10/23/91 BAKER/
Soditen 5.62 MG/L 09/04/91 pETH'I'II,
Thallitnn 0.1 MG/L 09/06/91 PRUTZMAN
Vanadiian <0.05 MG/L 09/05/91 PFtLfl'ZMAN
Zinc 0.020 MG/L 09/04/91 LIM
4. Axreditatlon No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Neturel Resources Cert. No. 236
~blic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health b Nat. Res. I.D. No. 4270)0
PA U.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Dept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Apricutture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 ~~ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surtace Mining Approved Facility
NY Dspt. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: < =LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. BOX 557,COTTON ROAD 5815 AIRPORT ROAD
MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 18335 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24012
PHONE: (814) 724-8242 PHONE: (703) 265.2544
FAX: (814)333-1466 FAX: (703)382-1863
11/01/91
TO: ROANORE CO. DTILITY DEPT P.O. #
ATTN: MR. SCOTT AGNBR
1206 RESSLER MILL RD.
SALEM VA 24153 ACCOIINT NO. 01425
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM PAGE 15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE ID ROANORE
RIVER
08/28/91
LAB ID 10828704
DATE RECEIVED: 08/28/91
J. RICHARD WOHLER, Ph.D.
_AEORtiroa~ ~~q_~-.
MEAOVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
KENNETH G. HART
_aB9pATnpr DiaEGT'A
ROANOKE. VIRGINIA
PARAMETER RESIILTS IINITS DATE AND ANALYST
TRI FORMATION POTENTIAL
Chloroform 0.067 MG/L 09/16/91 BCRLUND
Dichlorobromomethane 0.010 MG/L
Dibromochloromethane <0.002 MG/L
Bromoform <0.002 MG/L
Free Chlorine concentration at the end of the reaction period: 1.8 !!G/L
Trihalomethane Formation Potential (TPF) = 0.62 uFi/L as Chloroform
ttM/L =micro moles per liter
This complete report is fifteen pages.
~..~ .~
A. Accreditation No. 98 MD Dept. of Health Cert. No. 130 NC Dept. of Natural Resources Cert. No. 236
rublic Health Services Approved Facility VA Dept. of Health laboratory I.D. No. 00145 NC Dept. of Env., Health & Nat. Res. I.D. No. 42700
PA D.E.R. Laboratory I.D. No. 20-073 WV Oept. of Health Certification No. 21-R SC Dept. of Health Laboratory I.D. No. 89004
PA Dspt. of Apricufture Approved Dairy Laboratory NJ Dept. of Env. Protection Lab I.D. No. 77613 MI Dept. of Public Health Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Health Laboratory LD. No. 10552 =~"~„ Natl. Voluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. 1023 U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
NY Dept. of Env. Conservation Approved Facility
KEY: <=LESS THAN > =GREATER THAN w.f.=WILL FOLLOW
`=.
_ ~\ w
~:
FREE-COL LABORATORIES, INC.
P.O. s00( 667.COT70N ROAD 515 AIfpOR'f ROiAD
YEADVILLE, P!?M1~YLYAI~NA 1x135 NOiANOKE. VIRONA?+~W12
PHONE (h4) Tt4-~42 PMOI~IE: (70x) 316.2544
FAX: (t14) 333.14A6 FAX: (703) 3f33.1te3
ANALYTICAL REPORT FORM
CODE B:
CODE D:
CODE R:
~ CODE S:
CODE NA:
CODE ND:
VOID:
J. itlCllAtiO YYOHLER, faA.D.
ueoiu~oav oe~c+ou
A blank value over the detection limit of the test vas
subtracted from this result.
Detection limit change due to a dilution.
The percent recovery on the spiked sample associated vith this
sample vas not vithin the acceptance limits of 75~ - 125!
This result ras obtained by Method of Standard l~dditions.
Not lpplicable
Not Detectable
The sample plus spike concentration exceeded the linear range of
the standazd curve.
CODE Q: Values for parameters quantified in this sample have been
adiusted foz recoveries of the analytical matzix spike.
The adiustnents have been based on the matrix recoveries from
this sample or the recoveries from a sample at the same site.
~diusted values are not given vhere sample values vere less than
the detection limit or vhere spike recoveries are equal to 100$
r A. Accreellatton No. ae
;~ wbNe Hwth servfas Appwad F~dlily
PA aE.R. Laborabry I.a Na 20073
PA Dept. of Apriarlture Approved Delry Laboreary
NY Dept. a Heallh tab«eay l.a Na to6a2
NY Dept. or Env. Coraervetion Approve Facility
MD oapt. a Health drt. No. 130
w- Dept. of Hearth Laboratory LD. No. 00115
wv Dapt. d Health Certification No. 21-R
t+u Dept. d Env. Protection Lab I.a Na 77813
o~6f-f~ Natl. ~AOluntary Lab. Accred. Cert. No. ,029
Nc Dept. a R..ow~.e c.n. Na 236
rrc o.pL a Env., HeaNh a Net Rea l.a Na 12~oc
sc o•a. a HwMh Laborewry i.D. No. esoo.
Ml D•w. a Punic Health Approvd Faciiit)r
U.S. Office of Surface Mining Approved Facility
KEY: < -LESS THAN > .GREATER THAN w.f. ~ WILL FOLLOW
METHODS
PARAMETER METHOD SOURCE
Arsenic (flameless) 206.3 1
Mercury 245.1 1
Selenium (flameless) 270.3 1
Cyanide (distillation) 335.2 1
Fluoride 340.1 1
Nitrogen, Nitrate 353.2 1
Nitrogen, Nitrite 353.2 1
Sulfate 375.4 1
Radon 903.1 17
Radium 226 903.0 17
Radium 228 904.0 17
Asbestos TEM
Uranium E-U-O1 **
Acid Digestion Preparation Metals Intro. 1
Sect. 4.1.3
Semi-Volatile Compounds 625 5
Volatile Compounds 624 5
Herbicides 8150 2
Pesticides 608 5
PCB's 608 5
Glyphosate 547 U.S. EPA Draft Method
Diquat 549 U.S. EPA Draft Method
Alachlor 608 5
Atrazine 6pg 5
Butachlor 6pg 5
Dalapon
..
608
5
('
Dinoseb 608 5
Endothall 608 5
Metribuzan 608 5
Pichloram 608 5
Propachlor 608 5
Simazine 608 5
Metolachlor 608 5
Acrylamide 8240 2
Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 525 EPA/600/4-88/039
Aldicarb 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Aldicarb Sulfone 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Carbaryl 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Aldicarb Sulfoxide 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039
r
Carbofuran 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Methomyl 531,1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Vydate 531.1 EPA/600/4-88/039
Epichlorohydrin 608 5
Antimony (flameless) 204.2 1
Barium 200.7 1
Beryllium 200.7 1
Cadmium 213.1 1
Chromium 218.1 1
Copper 220.1 1
Lead 239.1 1
t~ Nickel 249.1 1
~_
f
Thallium
VOC Compounds
Trihalomethanes
Dioxin
Aluminum
Molybdenum
Silver
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
279.1 1
504 g
5710B 16
625 5
202.1 1
246.1 1
272.1 1
273.1 1
200.7 1
289.1 1
SOURCE
1 - "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water & Wastes", U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-79-020. Revised 1983.
2 - "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical
Methods, SW-84b, 2nd Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
April, 1984.
5 - "Part VIII Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 136,
Guidelines for Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of
Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Final Rule and Interim
Final Rule and Proposed", Federal Register, Oct. 1984.
6 - "The analysis of Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water by Liquid/
Liquid Extraction", USEPA, EMSL, Cincinnati, Ohio.
8 - "1,2-Dibromoethane (EDR) and 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DROP) in
water by Microextraction and Gas Chromatography", Method 504 (1985,
Edition Revised 1986.
16 - "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater",
17th Edition.
17 - "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater",
15th Edition.
'~ Anderson, C.H. and Long, J.M. 1980 Interim Method for
Determining Asbestos In Water, Environmental Research Laboratory,
Office of Research and T1evelopment, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Athens, Georgia 30605, EPA-600/4-80-005, pp. 1-34.
'~~ EML Procedures Manual HASL 300
ATTACHMENT N0. 3
Date
07-Oct-91
15-Oct-91
21-Oct-91
22-Oct-91
23-Oct-91
24-Oct-91
25-Oct-91
28-Oct-91
29-Oct-91
30-Oct-91
31-Oct-91
01-Nov-91
04-Nov-91
05-Nov-91
06-Nov-91
07-Nov-91
08-Nov-91
12-Nov-91
13-Nov-91
Roanoke River Bacteria
MPN/100ML
TOTAL FECAL
daily geo mean daily geo mean
900
130
500
170
170
500
1600
500
900
900
500
240
900
130
170
300
170
1600
1600
472
474
448
473
431
405
398
378
410
440
80
50
300
80
110
500
30
240
900
100
50
34
220
30
110
130
70
1600
500
142
129
116
122
110
110
111
108
126
135
•
~ ~ ~ C
a ~
•
1921 Salem Avenue. S. VU. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (7031 343-3618 Fax i i 03) 342-2054
Client: Roanoke River c/o RCUD
1208 Ressler Mill Road-
Salem VA
24153
~~W~~~D~L~~tS
Date:
October 11, 1991
Sample Code - A5461 Submitted By: Same.
Date Collected: 10/07/91 Date Submitted: 10/07/91
Analysis Date 10/07/91 Report Date 10/11/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 900 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 80 MPN
~ index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
~~
cn =©
v
-< o
~ ~~
f ~~
~ ~a
~~
o '~~ -~
w "~'
Remarks:
~%
! aboratory Director
•
~Qf
~1
~~~
df~11
1921 Salem Avenue. ~ '~'J • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-361 ~ r=ax (?03) 342-2054
' Client: Roanoke River c/o RCUD
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
~~~~~~o~a~~
oc~ ~~a~~~o~
Date:
October 17, 1991
Sample Code - A5598
Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/15/91 Date Submitted: 10/15/81
Analysis Date 10/15/81 Report Date 10/1?/82
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 130 MPN
index/100m1 SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 50 MPN
index/100m1 SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
rv -~' ~
-- r-- o
C --i D
~ ~o
a ~
~ ~~
_ •v ~
~ ~C
-i ~
rn --t
tD ~ ~
J
Remarks:
u~'~l
;oratory Direotor ~
~,
•
- ~~~ C
f ~
~f~11~ f
1921 Saiem Aver,~e. S VV. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (703} 343-36" 8 Fax (703) 342-2054
~~~' Roanoke River eJo Rt:UD
1206 Ressler Mi11 Road
Sale~a VA
24153:
~~~~~ r~O~Q~~
Date:
October 24, 1991
Sample Code - A5681 Submitted By:"Same
Date Collected: 1Ol21J91 Date Submitted: lfl/21l9~.,
Analysis Date 10121,91 Report Date 1C~/24I93.
Location: Roanoke River.- Rsw
-__
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 500 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221E Tech -PBN
Fecal Coliform 300 MPN
~., index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech -PBN
~~
~' o
~~
p ~ O
O~
f"n
~ ~ n
W "'~ y
~~
C'R •G
A A_
V~ •-- .
Remarks:
~„ LaboratorX Director
•
C
r ~
~~'~
1921 Salem Avenue. S W. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (7031 3~+~-3618 i=ax (7031 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility mgt,
1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem dA
24153
lf'11~~ ~~n~M(r-~~~
~~ L~1UVl; ~1t~ tl ~~~
Date:
October 28, 1991
Sample Code - A5?12 Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/22/91 Date Sub~titted: 14/22/91
Analysis Date : 10/22/91 Report Date 10/28/91
Location: Roanoke River -.Raw
Code Parameter
--- ------------------
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Result Method Notes
------------- ---------- ---------------
170 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
80 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
Laboratory Director
~._.
•
~~ C
•
d~n~~ r
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703} 343-3618 Fax {i03) 342-2054
~Ciien#: Roanoke County Utility ]'apt.
1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
~~~~(~~D~Q~~
Date:
October 28, 1991
Sample Code - A5746 Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/23/91 Date Submitted: 10/23/91
Analysis Date 10/23/91 Report Date 10/28/91
Location: Roanoke River -Raw
Code Parameter
--- ------------------
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Result Method Notes
------------- ---------- ---------------
170 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
110 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
v~
y -L---
~ahorafory Dir~eCtor ~
•
,-, ~~~ C
I~~f
d/~1
1921 Salem Aver~:.~. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone t703~ 3~~-3~~8 fax (7031 342-2054
Ctient: Roanoke County Ut i 1 ity Dept .
~~ 1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
~LS~~~~~~~Q~~
Date:
October 30, 1991
Sample Gode - A5766 Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/24/91 Date Submitted: 10/24/91
Analysis Date 10/24/91 Report Date 10/30/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 500 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 500 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
~~ ..t~ l .QY~~n/~I~Jr
~.
•
~, `~ ~ ~ C
•
~nn~~ r
1921 Salem Avenue. S. ~N. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703: 2~3-36, 8 Fax. 1703) 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153 ,
~~~~~~~~Q~~
Date:
October 30, 1991
Sample Code - A5782
Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/25/91 Date Submitted: 30/25/91
Analysis Date 10/25/91 Report Date 10/30/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 1600 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 30 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
~~ ~ ~•
/~ ~a~or~crv, DireCto~
•
_ O ~ ~~ C
•
~~'
1921 Salem Avenue. S. ~v. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone {703) 3~3-3616 Fax (703j 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
L5 W~~ ~~Dn~MLr,~~~
~~ 1;,~LI~JL,=~L~ It ~0~
Date:
November 1, 1991
--_
Sample Code - A5801
Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/28/91 Date Submitted: 10/28/91
Analysis Date 10/28/91 Report Date 11/01/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Farameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 500 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 240 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
< ~~
- -- _ ~__j:~ora?ory Direr' ~. _ _._
•
.-~ ~ ~ ~ C
•
F ~~'~
1921 Salem Avenue. S. b'V. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax ~703j 342-2054
' Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Kessler Mill Road.
Salem VA
24153
lf'/tl~~n~n /~~~n~MG=~~~
~~ G=ti1LIVL~I~If ~~~
Date:
November 4, 1991
Sample Code - A5810
Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 10/29/91 Date Submitted: 10/29/91
Analysis Date 10/29/91 Report Date 11/04/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter
--- ------------------
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Result Method Notes
------------- ---------- ---------------
900 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
900 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
~~
- ! ~uoratory Diret;t~~~~ ~~
Wetar
~Chami~lry
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone {703? 343-3618 l=ax (703) 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
Date:
November 5, 1991
Sample Code - A5836
Date Collected: 10/30/91
Analysis Date 10/30/91
Location: Roanoke River
Submitted By: Same
Date Submitted: 10/30/91
Report Date 11/05/91
Code Parameter
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Result
900 MPN
index/100 ml
110 MPN
index/100 ml
Method Notes
---------- ---------------
SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
w~
,....~
~;
Wetar
~Chamirt~y
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone f 7031 343-3618 Fa:x i X03 i 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
~'~~~ ~~~n~MQ~~
Q~ L=~UVG=~L~ tf ~~~
Date:
November 5, 1991
Sample Code - A5857
Date Collected: 10/31/91
Analysis Date 10/31/91
Location: Roanoke River
Submitted By: Same
Date Submitted: 10/31/91
Report Date 11/05/91
Code Parameter
--- ------------------
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
a
Result
500 MPN
index/100 ml
50 MPN
index/100 ml
Method Notes
---------- ---------------
SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
~!~'/
=, , -~.~ _
~ac~~ratorv D~r~=:
•
•
~r~~~
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. L'A 24016
Phone ( ~ 03) 343-36 i 8 Fax ~ ~03f 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Salem VA
24153
~~~~~~[~D~Q~C~
Oo G Q~aC~~~O~
Date:
November 5, 1991
Sample Code - A5883
Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 11/01/91 Date Submitted: 11/01/91
Analysis Date 11/01/91 Report Date 11/05/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 240 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 34 MPN
( index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
. ~~'~C/
_ ~,,,~
•
~~~ ~ ~~ C
•
dm~~ r
1921 Salem Avenue, S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703) 342-2054
Client:
1~~~bo~es=~~it~illil~oa~ Dept.
Sales VA
24153
~C~~~Of~~~,° `1~C
Date:
Novesber 8. 1991
Sample Code - A5887
Subsitted 8y: Same
Date Collected: ii/@4/91 Bate Subsitted: 11/84/91
Analysis Date a 11/04191 Report Date ~ 11/A8/91
Location: Roanoka River - Raw
Code Paraaeter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Colifora 900 MPN
index/100 al SM 9221 8 Tech - PBN
Fecal Colifora 220 MPN
index/100 al SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
~~
_.._ _ .. , _ _ _ t ;~
•
r ~ ~ ~~ C
•
df~11~ f
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (7031 342-2054
Client:
1~~5~~es~lert~il~iRoaa Dept.
Salem VA
24153
CSC G°~~~f~~C~Q~C
Date:
November 11, 1991
Sample Code - A5903
Subvitted By: 3a~e
Date Collected: 11/A5/91 Date Suboitted~ ii/A5/9i
Analysis Date ~ 11/85/91 Report Date : ii/11!91
Location: Roanoke Aiver -Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 130 MPN
index/100 ml SN 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 30 HPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
..
~~%'~
~. , : ---„
•
C%~ ~ C
~ dr
dm~~ ~
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703? 343-3618 Fax (703; 342-2054
Client:
Roanoke County Utility Dept,
1206 Ressler Mill Road
Sales VA
24153
~~~~o~o~a~~
Date:
November il. 1991
Sasple Code - A5924
Submitted By: Sass
Date Collected: 11/06/91 Date 3ubsitted: 11/06/91
Analysis Date ~ 11/06/91 Report Date ~ 11/11/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raw
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 170 NPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 110 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
'~
. - ~..,. ~<t„r, ~~
•
~ O ~ ~~ C
•
~~'~
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (7031 342-2054
Client:
Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Kessler Mill Road
Sale^ VA
24155
~~W~U-'t1~Qt1 LS
Date:
Noveaber 11. 1991
Sasple Code - A5952 ~#ubaitted By: Sase
Date Collected: 11/07/91 Date Su6aitted: 1~l07/91
Analysis Date : 11/07/91 R4port Date , 11111/91
Location: Roanoke River - Raft
Code Parameter Result Hethod Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform 300 HPN
index/100 ml 3H 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 130 HPN
index/100 ml SH 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
-- ~.', ~~ ~ ... "'~ ~,~ i . ~ ~ ~a r
i
•
O ~ ~ C
•
~~'
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703) 342-2054
ei
Roanoke County Utility Dapt.-
-1206 Hessler Mill Road
Sales ` VA
24153
J
~~~~~~~~Q~~
r~ Q~~° ~~~~~
Date:
November 11, 1991
Saaple Code - A5972 Sub'itted By: 8aae
Date Collected 11/0.8/91 lpate Sub~itted~ 11/08/91
Analysis Date : 1i/98/91 ~-~teport Date' _: 11/li/91
Location: Roanoke River - Adx
` ~::
Code Parameter
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Result
170 HPN
index/100 ml
70 MPN
index/100 ml
Hethod Notes
---------- ---------------
SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
..Remarks: fi
By .w.,
Laboratory Director
~_
•
...
•
~~'
1921 Salem Avenue, S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Fax (703j 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
1206 Ressler Mill Road
3ale^ VA
24153
CSC F~~~[~~C~Q~C~
Date:
November 15, 1991
Saaple Code - A5998 Submitted By: Same
Date Collected: 11/12/91 Date Submitted: 11!12/91
Analysis Date : 11/12/91 Report Date : 11115!91
Location: Roanoke River - RaW
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform >1600 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform >1600 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
. /~~~
~~-
L~ V
__~:~,~.~~~~~._:~~,~ Director
•
C. ~ ~ ~ C
•
~~'~
1921 Salem Avenue. S. W. • Roanoke. VA 24016
Phone (703) 343-3618 Pax (703) 342-2054
Client: Roanoke County Utility Dept.
12t~b Kessler Mill Road
Sala^ YA
24153
~~W/~~~~nlr~"~n~Mli ti1~~
Date:
November 18. 1991
Sasple Code - A6013 Su ^itte y: Same
Date Coilecteda 11/13/91 Date Subsitted: 11!13/91
Analysis Date : 11/13!91 Report Date : 11/18/91
Location, Roanoke Riger - Rav
Code Parameter Result Method Notes
--- ------------------ ------------- ---------- ---------------
Total Coliform >1600 NPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 B Tech - PBN
Fecal Coliform 500 MPN
index/100 ml SM 9221 C Tech - PBN
Remarks:
B~ ~,i~%/
'_drJO'cti0!`y' l`~IC@CtCr
P
ERECOTIVE SESSION
I move to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of
Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) for consultation with legal counsel and
briefings by staff members pertaining to actual or probable
litigation: i.e. Grumman Fire Equipment Company.
~~
,t
~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION 111991-16 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~ ~ Q~.~-~
Mary H. A len, Clerk
CC: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Executive Session
~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION 111991-17 OF APPRECIATION TO THE
ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB
FOR FOUNDING THE ROANORE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most
important services that can be provided by a local government; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was
responsible for founding the public library system in Roanoke
County in 1933, with a donation of 350 books and space in their
clubhouse; and
WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served
between 40 and 50 patrons per day during its first decade; and
WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for
donating books, facilities and workers to the library system; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently
stocks over 230, 000 books and serves over 1, 500 people per day, and
is one of the most popular services provided to citizens of Roanoke
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every
resident of the Roanoke Valley, does hereby extend its sincerest
appreciation to the ROANOKE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB for
foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library
System; and further
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes
continued success to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club in all
future projects.
~, r
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~~..~ '
Mary H. len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
George Garretson, Director, Libraries
.. ,
R--
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE
ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~B CLUB
FOR FOUNDING THE ROANORE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most
important services that can be provided by a local government; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was
responsible for founding the public library system in Roanoke
County in 1933, with a donation of 350 books and space in their
clubhouse; and
WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served
between 40 and 50 patrons per day during its first decade; and
WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for
donating books, facilities and workers to the library system; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently
stocks over 230, 000 books and serves over 1, 500 people per day, and
is one of the most popular services provided to citizens of Roanoke
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every
resident of the Roanoke Valley, does hereby extend its sincerest
appreciation to the ROANORE COUNTY JUNIOR WOMEN~S CLUB for
foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library
System; and further
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes
continued success to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club in all
future projects.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE 111991-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT 5266 WEST RIVER ROAD (TA7C
MAP NO. 64.04-4-19.1) IN THE CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R-E UPON THE APPLICATION OF
THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was
held November 19, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 2.9 acres, as described herein, and located at
5266 West River Road, (Tax Map Number 64.04-4-19.1) in the Catawba
Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning
classification of R-E, Residential Estate District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
STARTING at the old double locust tree at the
southwest corner of the property now or
formerly owned by Frank D. McDaniel (see DB
1
766, page 229); thence with the dividing line
between the said McDaniel property and the
property of Daniel Warren King (DB 761, page
141), N. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. W. 227.53
feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING of the herein-
described parcel of land, shown as 1-inch Rod
Set at fence line ints.; thence with the
boundary line between the subject property and
the property of Daniel Warren King hereinabove
mentioned, S. 76 deg. 25 min. 42 sec. W.
212.82 feet to a point located at a fence
post; thence with a new division line of the
original 5.658 acre tract of land, and along
a fence, N. 12 deg. 51 min. 05 sec. W. 441.55
feet to an iron pipe set at fence post; thence
N. 19 deg. Ol min. 35 sec. W. 18.96 feet to an
iron pin which also constitutes the
northeasterly corner of the 2.749 acre parcel;
thence N. 10 deg. O1 min. 24 sec. W. 224.26
feet as it intersects a power line to an iron
pin found on the 50-foot right-of-way on the
southerly side of Virginia State Route 639
(0.8 mile to Virginia State Route 649); thence
along the southerly side of said road, the
following five courses and distances: S. 72
deg. 20 min. 38 sec. E. 57.12 feet (again
intersecting with the power line aforesaid and
with a drive) to a point, S. 64 deg. 53 min.
28 sec. E. 48.99 feet to a point, S. 59 deg.
47 min. 34 sec. E. 40.19 feet to a point, S.
55 deg. 36 min. 42 sec. E. 47.91 feet to a
point, and 50 deg. 04 min. 03 sec. E. 79.61
feet, intersecting with a 10-foot gravel drive
to a point located approximately 11 feet from
a chain link fence post in cinder block;
thence leaving said State Secondary Route 639
and with the division line of the subject
property and the McDaniel property aforesaid
S. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. E. 496.61 feet,
through the middle of a shed to the PLACE OF
BEGINNING and containing 2.909 acres, as shown
on plat prepared by David B. Scott, C.L.S.,
dated April 18, 1983.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
2
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
3
~.
/191-/
PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CASE NUMBER: 25-11/91
Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991
A. REQUEST
Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to
bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located at
5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
In response to the Commission, staff said that a schedule has not been established for
changing the Comprehensive Plan designation for this area.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
None.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Ms. Chappelle moved to recommend approval of the petition and further recommended that
staff consider revising the Comprehensive Plan for this entire area. Mr. Witt asked that the
motion be amended to complete this revision within the next six months. Ms. Chappelle
agreed with Mr. Witt. The motion carved with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Gordon
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report _ Other
,.
Terrance ~rington~%~ecretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
//qr-1
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 25-11/91
REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
PETITIONER: Ms. Vickie Mack
DATE: November 7, 1991
a. This request is to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to
bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with
the zoning ordinance. Property is located in the Catawba
Magisterial District.
b. Petitioner would like to sell her house but potential
buyers are unable to obtain mortgage financing due to the
nonconfor~aing nature of the property.
c. This property is not within an identified industrial site.
The Department of Economic Development fully supports the
petition to rezone.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. Residential Estates District allows single family
dwellings, organizational uses such as schools and
churches, agricultural uses and other appropriate rural
residential uses.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: This property slopes upward from the road with
the house being part way up the hill.
b. Ground Cover: Typical residential groundcover - grass,
shrubbery, trees, driveway gravel.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar
Community Planning Area. This area is designated for
stimulated growth.
b. General area: Many residential properties in this
immediate area are also zoned M-2 including the properties
directly to the east, west, and south. Also, most of the
residential properties and the church, which are directly
across West River Road are zoned M-2. The remaining
properties are zoned A-1 and R-E.
1
/~~~~1
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the
proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable
impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and
N/A = not applicable.
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan
has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use
category. Considering the residential nature of this
community and the fact that the Economic Development
Department does not consider this area to be an industrial
site the comprehensive plan designation should be revised
to more accurately reflect the County's future plans for
this area.
1 b. Surrounding Land: Residential and civic uses.
1 c. Neighboring Area: Rural, large lot residential.
d. Traffic: No change.
e. Utilities: No change.
f. Drainage: No change.
g. Fire and Rescue Service: No change.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Principal Industrial. The
proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Principal
Industrial designation. This is an established residential
area. The County has no plans to utilize this area for an
industrial use. The Plan designation should be changed to
reflect the County's plans for this community.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) The site has been used for residential
purposes for many years. The neighborhood is residential
in nature. (2) The County has no intentions of developing
this area in a way consistent with the Principal Industrial
designation.(3) The County should initiate a revision to
the Comprehensive Plan to correct the designation for this
area.
b. Weaknesses: (1) None.
c. Proffers Suggested: (1) None.
2
lr~~~
Date Rec.: (v 1
Received By:~s
Case No.:
Ord. No.
ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
~ ~
- I `-'/
Q _ / .~.0'J 7 ~~
1. Owner's Name: ~Jl;i1-~- ~. ~f~L-IL Phone:~80-
Address: ~~(v~v ~~~~ i ,~iU'c°/L /~Oae/ o~~i/Fib, ~Q ~~/5~..3
~: Applicant's Name:
3.
Phone:
Address : J~2 !~ ~ ~~QS~ u~/~?,e /~Gl.c/ ~/~~Ei7~, 4'A- ~y/..~
Location of Property: ~~v~~~ ~~~/ ~/ ~~/~ ,,(~OA~ ~,H1F'f~ . U~.,
Tax Map Number (s) : ~ "~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ '- /~
4. Magisterial District: ~~~~cy6.9
5. Size of Property: ~ - `7 ~C~'~~s
6. Existing Zoning: >~~- Z
Existing Land Use: ~~-5/0~-~/~.
7. Proposed Zoning: ~~
Proposed Land Use: ~~
8 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: ''izi~c;~A~- (rv 0.~-TrL, o, cr
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
~~!~ Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map
~. Application Fee ---~-~ Written Proffers
. Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agen t--
/~r
Signature .rcc~~ %/ ~lc~ Dat ~~ ~Jc--.-
~~
. ; ,... S!f tiueJt;CT TO ihr~aMATZON WKICH nAY 4a DIBCt,piLD 8Y ?LSLa _J1~~TItACT.•
•l r•- ~ - ~1.-IIA1w ~• .~ ~~A Il
d, r~,~, ``..,~, ,.... ~ ~
~~. d s ,,.
0 ,a q ~v~rw,r~: ?
' l k `0~
:~. v ~ k o ~ ~ ~~• ~ 40 ~ r
~I~ ,
•~ o
a
.~ ..:
• ~~ ~ o~c~of s~'~ NOt/.~s HOV.~ o~JM
p, dEjAl~ .4 s~~Er/"tt0~
r •~r~.`~,, ~ W
;~ , •~~
x~a
~,~yE,.~ _ ~ M~tTAC.riV~O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~i,4 }
y~{( {y y I~ , ~ ~ .
~s'_' ~ ~ /
~~ ~~ pAN/El N'A,FRFN /~ PRC~ ~'ME 1ZUnJ60? PR04tR?Y Ie NO
~1LZ'HiN T,HE 4ZMY'Z8 Qt TNT _.20
J ~r .~~ ~ AX /1/4. ~¢•OQ.O¢•,d/ ~`~AR l~t~QQ~D`.:~O~ND~IR,Y,;';11~.::~HbW
.:,:;,, ••.:,. r ~QN.. ~'Nm PRIMA dLQQA ~1wNpAttY
!!AR- ?8i~ ~ Ds~~RMINATi~SN -. IS
C~ ~' ~' .BASED 0 ~p~ P4~D _ $i~DNbARY
ti111f AtVO AAA l1pT ~~ a e~
~y ~r rA 8~ ACZ'tlAL ltELO 11L~VA~'YONS.
_ ~ d/' • ~. 5+0 ~ Ae'~ES, siru~l~ ~r~i; ~yY~sj Rir.r~~Io
ahx ~ •.
` ^, 11 •
_~~~_ •
_ ,,~ ,
D ~• d~ vIROINIA F
0,•~i iCAli t
8Ys T. P. PAFtKGR ~ SON ~_o~.~, ~
'•''"~ ~ ~~tc..~'~.~...'. ENOiN[~Rb i S~RV~1!Q~~ ~ tTD.
M~ ~ oK~O~.~i.,` t LiM viRplhlA _...,., wp. p.
1h•N~ •• IIbM.w
• ..1~1(S-M~1r~1i.10f .~
~ , ,_ ~ .
v
_.
~` .
,:i^ I
y'
rw . . ..
` '
t,,,1
~: ~
.
.~" I Iy t00' .
l,~j:~
,,,
~*
;
~`
-
'~
~
• , .
: _ t 1
° M2 . .
- ':~+~ a
~ / M~~ s
e.ilAi
- i M ~?
M2
7
M? n
2~ ,
.. ,
~.ak t.uAR
~.~ - tf
.. a
M
~
~ ~ s~ .""~.. ~
3
~ ~ }mot, '
tiNM
1
' ~ U
+ n
-
9'"
~.~. li
~ M~
o ~~
f~ i ~. sa
;tt:' : - ~o
A<
M2 tttA. ~
.
r,
~
~C II ~ ~~Z ~
.
~
.;tk
~
~ 1 I.oAC R ~ MZ .M
~.!!At
_
b
`
te-c 1 Y.1 4
t
0~1 ~
too A
0
,,,, .,
•.ti,.,,,,.. .
t
N
~uko MZ c l
1
1>t/AC ICI
~.~ M2 M
~t M2
:~~r~°
w
~
'
'~ ~
=
k
.yP::. ;.
•.
~
M2
x M2
M2
1
-
S x
~
~, LgAt
M2 e~~
ti
~ ~ __
~,s
.WY
Y6 ~2 1
aoo~c pl
I
~"a~`' T., aa~~
i ras ~~ REN: I I
• ~0 ~ A/ ~lOACCI
t==+++ `C
~
,fit= .-- - y.-~- ..~ 'w<~ Rg
- o~~~,. ) Ac ~
~~ R _-
"r_
_
±. I
~
`
.
~~
~'
-'
MtlMta at A~ R V B I It I
~ MA
-
IAIiAL AMO MAPPUIY ttRvlCt ~ ' ' '
iiiA~t, WA~OpA
~ :: i •a•N i
r.». ..
.:._:,•.
~;
~~
,.
,
y
N~
~Sul~
T~"C T
,
l°
~h'C
'
~
~
.
~tf,
i r
,~
,
! ~. ~
.a2. ~o C
~", ~ ~ - ~
COMMUNITY SERVICES M-2 TO R-E
AND DBVBLOPMENT TAX MAP # 6 4.0 4 - 4 -19.1
i
r~~~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF A 2.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT
5266 WEST RIVER ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 64.04-4-
19.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R-E UPON THE APPLICATION OF
TH8 ROANORE COIINTY PLANNINQ~ COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was
held November 19, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 2.9 acres, as described herein, and located at
5266 West River Road, (Tax Map Number 64.04-4-19.1) in the Catawba
Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning
classification of R-E, Residential Estate District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
STARTING at the old double locust tree at the
southwest corner of the property now or
formerly owned by Frank D. McDaniel (see DB
766, page 229); thence with the dividing line
1
r
/1~~-1
between the saic
property of Danis
141), N. 13 deg.
feet to the PLACE
described parcel
Set at fence 1:
boundary line bet
the property of D
mentioned, S. 7~
212.82 feet to
post; thence wit]
original 5.658 ac
fence, N. 12 deg
feet to an iron p
N. 19 deg. 01 min
iron pin whi<
northeasterly cox
thence N. 10 deq
McDaniel property and the
:1 Warren King (DB 761, page
31 min. 57 sec. W. 227.53
OF BEGINNING of the herein-
of land, shown as 1-inch Rod
ne ints.; thence with the
seen the subject property and
~niel Warren King hereinabove
deg. 25 min. 42 sec. W.
i point located at a fence
~ a new division line of the
re tract of land, and along a
. 51 min. 05 sec. W. 441.55
ipe set at fence post; thence
. 35 sec. W. 18.96 feet to an
h also constitutes the
ner of the 2.749 acre parcel;
. O1 min. 24 sec. W. 224.26
feet as it intersects a power line to an iron
pin found on the 50-foot right-of-way on the
southerly side of Virginia State Route 639
(0.8 mile to Virginia State Route 649); thence
along the southerly side of said road, the
following five courses and distances: S. 72
deg. 20 min. 38 sec. E. 57.12 feet (again
intersecting with the power line aforesaid and
with a drive) to a point, S. 64 deg. 53 min.
28 sec. E. 48.99 feet to a point, S. 59 deg.
47 min. 34 sec. E. 40.19 feet to a point, S.
55 deg. 36 min. 42 sec. E. 47.91 feet to a
point, and 50 deg. 04 min. 03 sec. E. 79.61
feet, intersecting with a 10-foot gravel drive
to a point located approximately 11 feet from
a chain link fence post in cinder block;
thence leaving said State Secondary Route 639
and with the division line of the subject
property and the McDaniel property aforesaid
S. 13 deg. 31 min. 57 sec. E. 496.61 feet,
through the middle of a shed to the PLACE OF
BEGINNING and containing 2.909 acres, as shown
on plat prepared by David B. Scott, C.L.S.,
dated April 18, 1983.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\westrive.rd
2
`~ ,,n
i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE 111991-19 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 12.387 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED 0.8 MILE NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE
POINT OF INTERSECTION OF BERRLEY ROAD AND
NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RAILWAY (TAX MAP NO. 50.03-
1-7) IN THE VINTON AND HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICTS FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-
1 AND M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-
1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was
held November 19, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 12.387 acre, as described herein, and located 0.8
mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road
and Norfolk & Southern railway, (Tax Map Number 50-03-1-7) in the
Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts, is hereby changed from
the zoning classification of A-l, Agricultural District, and M-2,
General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of A-1,
Agricultural District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a set iron on the northeasterly side of now
or formerly Norfolk and Western Railway said point being
located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of
intersection of Berkley Road, said point further being
the northerly corner of property of Joe Helms & Sons,
Inc. (DB 1253, page 1); thence with the northeasterly
side of the Norfolk and Western Railway N. 42 deg. 27
min. 25 sec. E. 330.90 feet to a found iron rod; thence
leaving the said now or formerly Norfolk and Western
Railway S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 469.22 feet to a
set iron; thence N. 40 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. E. 81.26 feet
to a set iron; thence S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E.
666.94 feet to a concrete monument (IM-303B) located on
the northwesterly line of property of Blue Ridge Parkway;
thence with the same S. 11 deg. 39 min. 15 sec. 399.93
feet to a concrete monument (IM-303A) located on the line
of property of the aforesaid Joe Helms & Sons, Inc.;
thence with the same S. 62 deg. 45 min. 10 sec. W. 172.89
feet to a 20-inch ash with old marks; thence still with
property of Joe Helms & Sons, Inc. and generally
following traces of an old fence N. 43 deg. 52 min. 25
sec. W. 1280.53 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and
containing 12.387 acres as shown on survey for Frank P.
Ognibene and Dorothy Ognibene dated 4 June 1990, made by
Mountain Top Surveyors, Inc. and further known as Tax Map
No. 50-03-1-7.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
..~" -
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
. ~ ~ ~ /~
PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CASE NUMBER: 26-11/91
Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991
A. REQUEST
Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-
2 to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance,
located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk &
Southern railway, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission asked if an elevation certification is needed prior to issuance of a building
permit and staff replied that it may be required by engineering or building inspections.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
None.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carved with the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Gordon
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report _ Other
i\\ ~- -
_ ,_`_~
Terrance H~ngton, retary
Roanoke Qounty Planning Commission
STAFF REPORT 1 / "
CASE NUMBER: 26-11/91 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD
PETTIZONER ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1991
Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-
1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8
mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern Railway,
Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts.
NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Unconditional request to construct approximately 1,000 sq.ft. of additional space onto
petitioner's existing dwelling which currently straddles M-2/A-1 district boundary.
b. Vicinity map indicates neighboring zoning designations.
c. Property is not an identified industrial site and owner's request is supported by the Count}~s
Economic Development office.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. A-1, Agricultural District permits a wide variety of rural residential, agricultural,
organizational, institutional and a very limited number of commercial uses.
b. Site plan review will not be required.
c. VDOT will not require any change involving private entrance permit.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat bordering tracks southeast toward existing house which rests on a plateau
above most of front yard. Steep uphill southeast of dwelling.
GROUND COVER: Thick mixed deciduous evergreen forest behind house; grass and gravel driveway
in front of house.
AREA CHARACTERISTICS
FU'T'URE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Bonsack Community Planning Area. Although
Bonsack proper is designated for stimulated growth, subject site lies outside urban service limits.
GENERAL AREA is undeveloped. Forests, floodplain, and elevated N&W tracks dominate the general
area.
LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 thru 5.
1 =positive impact, 2 =negligible impact, 3 =manageable impact, 4 =disruptive impact,
5 =severe impact, and N/A =not applicable.
1l~'~-~?
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area
within a Rural Preserve and a flood hazard area. Rural residential uses at very low
densities are encouraged with high compatibility in Rural Preserve. No portion of dwelling
or its proposed expansion lie within flood hazard area.
2 SURROUNDING LAND: Single family residential, park and open space, woodland, N&W
rail line, and floodplain.
2 NEIGHBORING AREA: See "surrounding land' ; also additional park and open space,
woodland, and floodplain.
2 SITE LAYOUT: See "topograph}~' and "ground cover." Property is accessible via aone-
mile long private drive intersecting that portion of Berkley Road maintained in City of
Roanoke.
2 ARCHITECTURE: One story brick; brick expansion including kitchen, living room, dining
room, family and entrance.
IL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: N/A
N1A AIVIENI"I'IES: N/A
3 NATURAL AMENI'TIF.S: See "drainage floodplain."
TRAFFIC
2 STREET CAPACTfIF.S: No change.
2 CIRCULATION: No change.
2 WATER: Existing well.
2 SEWER: Existing septic.
DRAINAGE
2 BASIN: Glade Creek.
3 FLOODPLAIN: Most of petitioner's front yard is located within FEMA 100 year floodplain.
Dwelling itself rests well above projected 100 year flood level. Elevation certification may
be required from a licensed surveyor.
/i9~-a
PUBLIC SERVICES
~ FIRE PROTECTION: No changes; not within established service standard.
~ RF,SCUE: No changes; not within established service standard.
PARKS AND RECREATION: N/A
SCHOOLS: N/A
TAX BASE
2 LAND AND IIViPROVEMENT VALUE: $69,500 (land and existing dwelling)
TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YF.AR: N/A
TOTAL EMPLOYEES: N/A
TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: Approximately $785 (current)
PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Rural Preserve and Flood Hazard. Petitioner's request is consistent with
Rural Preserve guidelines, specifically policy RP-3 (allow only limited very low density residential
and limited institutional land development that is not detrimental to productive agricultural lands,
forest resources, and park and open space facilities). No portion of existing dwelling or proposed
addition lie within a flood hazard area.
STAFF EVALUATION
STRENGTHS: 1) Petitioner's property has been used residentially for several years. 2) The County
does not intend to develop this area according to its industrial site inventory.
WEAIdVESSES: None.
PROFFERS SUGGESTED: None.
~ ~~
Date Rec.:
Received By:
Case No.:~
Ord. No..
ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name: .~,~},~k gw~ ~~°-~~r~~ ©6~~~~.~e Phone:,~~~f~S~.ra7
O rlnJ ~ v.~-
Address : ~ ~ S 13 ~ R K LE y h-Z n VR _ ~ 4 o i -~
/b3
2. Applicant's Name: ~2%¢N~-- ©!~N/ScNGr' Phone: 3Y~-~t~7
Address: /~J' /.~c~Kur ~~'o.~/~ /~~f+.~olLc lr~r ~~fo /2
3. Location of Property: d. 8 ~l~~e no Qrrr @ri5 rc:/z~~ t-Qo~+r 7tiE rOi7T Or 1n rE¢pe~c T/O iJ OF ~F[~s~
~K~ /
Tax Map Number(s):
4. Magisterial District:
5. Size of Property:
05'0 , t93 - I -
(/, ~/ to ~J - f-/v L L ~,~ S
/~... j ~ ~/ /~c~eES
6. Existing Zoning: ~! - 2 9^'v A - /
Existing Land Use: ~es;~.~-7«~ ~s~
7. Proposed Zoning: ~-/
Proposed Land Use: ~h ~ ~~~~=1.~-~~ ~ ~ti-~ c~~~ ~:h., .
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~a`~ ~~~"-~~-
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes
No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application ~ Concept Plan
/ Metes and Bounds Description List of Ad~a~ent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) / Vicinity Map
N~,4 Application Fee Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Age t:
/~ ~
Signatur `- _ e'-~- Date j vZo-f/
<~,~C--c_ y- 3 u- 9 i
~•
•
Frank & Dorothy Ognibene
195 Berkley Road
P.O. Box 1433
Roanoke, Virginia 24007
County of Roanoke
Department of Planning & Zoning
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Attn: Terrance L. Harrington September 20, 1991
Director
Dear Mr. Harrington,
In June of 1990 we purchased a home on 12.387
acres with the intentions of adding an addition. The original
papers we have showed the house in A-1 ZONE and the front of the
property in M-2 ZONE.
Double checking with the county, we found the
house to be in the M-2 ZONE, and in order to add an addition we
must have a zoning change.
We feel that the zone change will be an upgrade
for the area.
FO;pf
Respectfully,
/~~
Frank O nibene
- /
BLUER/OGEPAA.f'N,4Y
s
~-
~s~o -
~~ •~
?B9' ~.
w~c~,vr
L,v~arc
cou^.r~>f
.vT
L,~,rtur
TYTOAN/•!/.OLS 5,76'04'10"E ~~ ~~ ~~
X66 ~~
;4BL/S//ED /N /4d 66'
GbGdPTfzi9
O AC4SAELOC.OTEO ~
T TF.O<ES OF
'PAGE ~/S. s U(OFENCE
LOGY>PLA/rY
'
B/
iOCTCl4L / .f~gKAlrNT
/.K.1R70
c~Ty /
~
i Q
~
~s/4 ~ QB'o~'4o'•E
.4C~',S 666.99'
' ~
l
~
~
1
~
p
~
A
c
f/WTLJ
696.'94'
._. __ _....
I
UNCFE : E ~
~1L UCA"
BU/LO/NG PR•POSF D •L'/TENTSI ~N N4~' ~~•<
N O'/9.10 "E ~w i
~
/ 90.3
~
B,l?6'
METAL V U
ZS I ~ 1 • ?O1B'
SNEO - /S
IZ. /N6LESTOFr -~
BF/C.f
~ ~
_~ ~~ .OPi',5
q/CH~li9D G. B D.4iYrVA. ~Y/JGiYEL~ __ ~ ~
'
~
49L1 ' Fjs
G.
i!./Q AO/'G. /662 / PANE
O.B. /.~/6PG. ?S.9
~v _
I ae'v~ EFf,
I
i
: fLEPNUNEPEOEST,4(
S 44' 49'90"E .sEE.~nrE'
1 /
996./0\ I
// ~
1 O
~
S ~B-0T 40"E
"
46911
I f/RE
F~,~~~ ~ ~~rH y o4N,a~~
NYORs1NT
- - ~ w,oTE.o vaLtg-,~ .~
/ voan ~,rE coati'Tr OFFi[ !~
%RX K~4~
1 ,R~7
~
' NOTEFMANrYULE
1---- - ---- _
- ,
~ce,aLro S'U,o3
y / -
1/LSB .9909 BER•eECFraoao
- v e •1~ zS L-
- THEPOr~T/ON
' _ _ NOM'OAfUr~,~NENLI' :S'/TU/!TE
_
~OAFl7Lit'.4N0 NESTEANN.4%LlY.4Y _ __ TfiLENc
S'OL L/NS
• /OD ' O ' /00 ' POO '
D,~
\,/~~~~ ~ ~ ~z NUBS. G NOM
es ~ ~
~' a O ~ ~ 4,~ 403
~ \REE •/ *f
IIY ~_
a! C ~
~ gvMn ~ 3 \
4CkER 781 ~
` ~ ' ~y ~ °q. ~2UYNER cv
~ \ APPLEW00~ ~ ~ SPRIN
5 ^"I L-~
S ~' R' LN O ~ ~ V 658
7=~ \~\~~' JONAT HAN ~I =
~F ~ ~
3='y ~~ ~ ,. ~ i z o OLD S
~ ` ~"0` '-; ° ° ~ HPaD f:ST RI pF'E V 604 ~ CK.
os Rp
~.1~(-~ j ~ \/ CD 0.C N,Nq" °PW°° , LA BELLEVUE DqC HLN ~ } 9p t~ _ \ jL~ DE C1c. "D
>< rqY \ ~ B~NSACK ~ 0 636
~'`o ` a " `'q ~~ q ~ 240 ~~ p . F q .. ~ ~ I
e'~ ~ a "I s
X18 '~ 19--~
/ ° ~ HUNTRIDGE~Iy`~~° ~ ~ ~i
L1 BELLE 0 ~^ A P $\ , q ey ~
q~\ \ t
IItN Rn_~~ wES N GEC ~,¢(~ \ 609 0" 603 ~O ~`
611 ,~ _ ~ ISTERIA~ ~„ eD~jS~'p ~ RD , ~
p 4N
l
Y~,. 4 ~. ~~' a `p.FE BACK-D- pqo ~~.. E
~$,,. ~~ ~ 610"\d6 oq
,~,~~ ~ Stewart
cuxel,na.,~lc. «7 '~ ` ' ~~F,`,~ ~ ~ G` Knob
~~e
~A ~ \co~ a DIST T ~ 2
,~, >~ R : ,~a •
` "r ROANOKE CENTE <~~, . pq'L ~~ ~~ FALLING %.REEK
fs ~ ~ \ F TRT . aE<< o p
/",; ,, - HNOL069 qQ C~O?s ~ - -"L. _. IoM"OH• ~Fq 2 v ~c'r 4Q~. a i \
,` SODA' 7WIry '~ 2~t 0"v ~ V ~ J2
_. s t t B~ _ RKR~ PyGyk1~cF ~~ Mbt/p N o~2 ? o° ~ ¢ \
LINDA s( °'4 MHQ AArG~R ~ ti' G~ POP ~ 4Pv <o g ~ _
24012 6`9D. NIR~ s 7ESN~{gk $ ~ 09 ~ ~ Coq DR ~°~ g GLEN PO
INDUS Av ~ L O ~ DV
~ •p \ ~ ` J R ~ ~ ..
HTS", ~ PARN ~s ar d4q~
~ * YI1R0 ~°l1 ~ . ~ ~ ~7Y `\P \ y~ ~~ . ~' Q4N C1a. ~ ~ 1
~N, Ar' n'$ ~ . I[11 ~ ~ fit`' Y h y'a ~1
YK t ° '10V . ao .. "\~ r9i^s \ ~ iy 651
t -'
~ ~' B ,y ~ P~ ~~o o ti n' 1 xn h tD. ~E 651
' ~
~ ~ Ti O 6t" ° .~ 'L i~ ~, SG ~ .~ ANOER 1 880 O~
DL qp q'<< 'rln TATION 1 °ES AN ~
•b ~ per q Cis F\D"' yo ~" G '
~~ ~ D~' ~ STONEBR I D~v CRE q ~Z ~aH°
~ "i. ' ~a~~~.~ .,.,~ v~~e v;,~O ~4~~5 ~o i\~tDp .~ . ~ ~ i'~Y ~.\ 24179 ~+r se00. oh BgYIGH 618 O
,, ,
.~ ~ 3~\p~ ~! _ MAN L '"s ~ <+ p~
~Fy "8t " ~ 4' ~ ~ ~O~ 9~ R ~ SIF,p I~~'
"/' ' i yIP`' '` s~ ~ •d iN
pY.tt Ls ~c N1 ~ t qk~, _. o ~"4P.
r ~ ~ P ~~
N n r r
N. _ CEOA R ` ~ ~ ~ W4srn 4DA,. ~. L - N 0
-,_
,~.AI.L - r. ~ R INI A AV Nq y ~ ~~s'; DtNERON 4A I ~ __
~ ~ j
n
~P - HARDF AOA ? q - $ ~
. ~- 1~.. .. ' ~~ • ~ ~ OLA ~ ~' g N USN VACLE ralOptON OR. u~ q.
4 ELEN. ..-_. 634 '~~ ~ ~ oR p1L1D11R ~;
~ « FtLlO SIDE • • A ~ - piC LU lN.
.E 1 "`~ K rs` ~ YN y°'~' P~ D7n DR. Eoy 1Rr a ~` 1 a S'9~i ~~ c LAnsL°"D~
EN70D /C( 6gEE" 'L`~" S(Y ' t yl ~~TIMB ' ~ `'CD $~ R A ~ ~ \'\ F N z DR.Q
FARM `" j
aec.cTa. ~ OD so ~ ssa
s ~ 240FS~ a v
'"~ 5 v N t+ 6RtARCLIFFSWIMCiu ~~~ ~ v yr ~ 9r )0 634 1034 \
~^ + A ~'V ~ ~f g 1101 ~YCW ObFF 4q'' ar /. \ ' ~0 57N CIR. N I
' ~q"/~ SEWAGE ~'$ foeD 1r ~ / " + R ~ , _-_
„~ TREATME T BL1 4BBEYpR FI E ~/„~1-~ ~ ~ ~~~w•• 63 1,
;t~ sp dIDR ° `'PLAN DN HTS. a I 1 ~~o* ° L ~ ~4'.IV I ,'O /~,\~
~" DD`W J" ' -DR a' i' > r- ~ \~ ` :~./ tit ._.-
r e ~ _~o 'AgJI 'R I VERDALE °ypF E~4p Ro. ~ ^ ~z~~ A''e~m ~ ~R f `1C ,'i~?`~ r/~ .
_ 9y ~~ NPARN qqi s L ~ ~~ lv P~ RI ? CM 'Y~~G ~/? ~~~
>YAY _' ~~' NYy N \ a ~+ !QV' RD- ~R"E 4y. ~ ` 9 r s ~ ~~y ..
s
~ 1 ~ ~ x.
p o r
pA f r ` 4y V" •i NIGNICNO ~ `!~ NIA°A ~ ~~~w{ ED •6~
_ _ ``! ~ so~f Ai >F4 /f ~ s c~ F $- off= D
4V ` ~ AD 9p 9t O 3 `!l.\. ~ ~R \E ~I -
- F. S.il~~m ~ , ~ r wonm eve ~. aD < y~o4.. LAxnsru. A'l !/GeZ V L
~~ ~
NORTB
M-2 & A-1 TO A-1
COMMUNl7'f'SERVICES TAX MAP # 50.03-1-~
AND DEVELOPMENT
~iqi ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF A 12.387 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED
0.8 MILE NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE POINT OF
INTERSECTION OF BERKLEY ROAD AND NORFOLK &
SOUTHERN RAILWAY (TAX MAP NO. 50.03-1-7) IN
THE VINTON AND HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS
FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 AND M-2
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 UPON THE
APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PL~iNNINC3
COMMI88ION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 22, 1991, and the second reading and public hearing was
held November 19, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 12.387 acre, as described herein, and located 0.8
mile northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley Road
and Norfolk & Southern railway, (Tax Map Number 50-03-1-7) in the
Vinton and Hollins Magisterial Districts, is hereby changed from
the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District, and M-2,
General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of A-1,
Agricultural District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of the
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
3 . That said real estate is more fully described as follows
/i~i~~
BEGINNING at a set iron on the northeasterly
side of now or formerly Norfolk and Western
Railway said point being located 0.8 mile
northeasterly from the point of intersection
of Berkley Road, said point further being the
northerly corner of property of Joe Helms &
Sons, Inc. (DB 1253, page 1); thence with the
northeasterly side of the Norfolk and Western
Railway N. 42 deg. 27 min. 25 sec. E. 330.90
feet to a found iron rod; thence leaving the
said now or formerly Norfolk and Western
Railway S. 48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 469.22
feet to a set iron; thence N. 40 deg. 19 min.
20 sec. E. 81.26 feet to a set iron; thence S.
48 deg. 07 min. 40 sec. E. 666.94 feet to a
concrete monument (IM-303B) located on the
northwesterly line of property of Blue Ridge
Parkway; thence with the same S. 11 deg. 39
min. 15 sec. 399.93 feet to a concrete
monument (IM-303A) located on the line of
property of the aforesaid Joe Helms & Sons,
Inc.; thence with the same S. 62 deg. 45 min.
10 sec. W. 172.89 feet to a 20-inch ash with
old marks; thence still with property of Joe
Helms & Sons, Inc. and generally following
traces of an old fence N. 43 deg. 52 min. 25
sec. W. 1280.53 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING
and containing 12.387 acres as shown on survey
for Frank P. Ognibene and Dorothy Ognibene
dated 4 June 1990, made by Mountain Top
Surveyors, Inc. and further known as Tax Map
No. 50-03-1-7.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp51\agenda\wning\berkky.rd
~~~dS~ l~~ ~~ ~~s ~~ die rs f ~reseY, ~a~i,n,
~ ~ ,F o u oC.'~-.
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. l ~ ~l
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~~~ri ~ c z ~i d~-- o -F is s u P .S ~ ~~ •1 j,
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
VVl^~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO TIIN CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111111111111~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. l~3
APPE CE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
~--~
SUBJECT: ~~-..; ~!~ %°~ ,, .~..__ ,.~,, F' .~~~, !`' ~.~~ .~ c,~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR TSE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
11111111111111111111111111111111~1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
~~
AGENDA ITEM NO. / ~g f ' -~
APPE CE REQUEST FOR
,~
{ 'PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS
SUBJECT. ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~t~~~y~~-'L--
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will 6e given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
,-~
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. /1 ~/- 3
APPE CE REQUEST FOR
~-~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~ rn r ~ ~a.t~ ,L~c h.~~~ (l - ~r~"'~ ~y/ /~'-l~ ~,u~~~~~~
~~~~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO 1'I~ LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
''Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllll
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~- --3
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ' `-~al~ 1 r~~r,,--s .~,.,~,.~.~ al s~~~ c ~ n u ~ 6 0,.-
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~Prc~~ a,. ~~-, ~-o%--sm-
PHONE ~~~_ac3Z
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~illlllllllllllilllllllliiillllllllllillllllllll
~iq~-~
PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY
CASE NUMBER: 27-11/91
Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 1991
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 19, 1991
A. REQUEST
Petition of Roanoke County Resource Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit
conditions and operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on 640.39 acres on the
northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba
Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission requested that the landfill permit conditions and policies be revised to clarify
grammer and other issues.
D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
See attached.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Ms. Chappelle moved to recommend approval of the petition as amended. The motion carried
with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Massey, Chappelle, Witt, Robinson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Gordon
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS: X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report _ Other
~-~~~ '~~
Terrance H 'ngton F ecretary
Roanoke ounty Pl nning Commission
llgl-3
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Terry Harrington
DATE: October 31, 1991
RE: Request of Roanoke County Resource Authority to Revise
Permit Conditions and Operating Policies to Provide for
the Hauling of Refuse by Rail; Smith Gap Landfill;
Catawba Magisterial District.
Background
In 1989 the Board of Supervisors adopted the permit conditions
and operating policies for the proposed Smith Gap Landfill. These
conditions and policies were developed by the Landfill Citizens
Advisory Committee, and were reviewed by the Commission prior to
their adoption. At the time of their adoption, access to the
proposed landfill was envisioned to be by way of a new access road
through Smith Gap. The recent decision to transport all of the
refuse to the landfill by rail has necessitated that the previously
adopted conditions and policies be modified to reflect this option,
and to extend to the residents within the proposed rail corridor
the protections currently offered to property owners around the
landfill site.
You received the proposed modifications in your packet last
month. A summary of these changes is presented below.
PERMIT CONDITIONS
I. Types of Waste
The original intent was to separate debris and sanitary fill
areas at the proposed landfill. Since that time it has been
determined to be equally cost effective to intermingle these two
types of waste. Areas will be set aside for "special wastes", so
that their location can be known and monitored. (Pg. 1)
II. operating Hours
Operating hours for the delivery of waste by rail have been
added to the permit conditions. (Pg. 1) These hours reflect the
1
//9'~ 3
evening delivery of waste to the landfill. As an entire days
refuse will be at the site when landfill crews arrive in the
morning, evening operating hours have been cutback to S:OOpm
Monday-Friday, and 3:30pm on Saturday
Due to the rail access, there will be no residential drop off
at the landfill. Thus, residential drop-off hours have been
eliminated. (Pg. 2) This service will take place at the transfer
station located in Roanoke.
III. Operating Controls
The permit conditions are revised to indicate that residents
in the rail corridor will be provided a telephone number to call
to complain about noise, dust, odor, or pests. (Pg. 4)
IV. Environmental Monitoring
A log will be kept of all complaints of residents and
businesses in the landfill area and the rail corridor. (Pg. 4)
O. Screening and Buffering
The existing conditions contain numerous standards for
screening and buffering at the landfill. The revised conditions
reflect that it may not be possible to totally buffer the rail line
from surrounding residents. The proposed conditions indicate that
Norfolk Southern will attempt to negotiate buffering issues, where
feasible, with property owners during purchase negotiations. (Pg.
6)
vI. site security
Provisions for security associated with the night time
delivery of waste by rail have been included in the conditions.
(Pg• ~)
The conditions now include standards requiring that vehicle
access points to the rail spur be properly gated, locked and posted
with "No Trespassing" signs. Signs will also be posted along the
rail spur. (Pg. 8)
OPERATING POLICIES
(Note: The operating policies, are policies of the Board,
and are not conditions attached to the Special
Exception Permit.)
2
~~~
I. Groundwater Protection
The proposed revisions to the operating policies guarantee
owners along the rail corridor groundwater protections in the event
of a derailment of waste, or if landfill contamination is detected
in their wells. (Pg. 11)
Ii. Property value Protection
The property value protections offered to residents around the
landfill have been extended to cover residents within the rail
corridor. (Pg. 13)
Moving expense provisions have been modified to reflect that
some eligible residents may now reside and wish to reside within
Montgomery County, and that payment for expenses shall be made
within 60 days. (Pg. 14)
III. Landfill Ownership
The revisions clarify that the newly formed landfill agency
(Roanoke Valley Resource authority) has full responsibility for
construction and operation of the landfill, and transportation of
the waste under the terms of the Norfolk Southern contract. (Pg.
15)
IV. Landfill Operational Priorities
Protecting the interests of the residents of the rail corridor
has been added as an operational priority. (Pg. 16)
O. Rail Access
These provisions have been added to the operating policies to
reflect the importance of providing safe. and adequate rail access
to the Smith Gap site. Many of these policies were discussed
during the public hearings on choosing a method of transporting
waste to the landfill. (Pgs. 17, 18) In summary these policies
address:
1. Access control to and
2. Minimizing the number
3. Train speed.
4. Construction standards
5. Use of train whistles.
6. Timing of trains.
7. Restrictions on use of
posting along the rail line.
of trains per day.
for grade crossings.
rail spur to landfill.
3
119~~~
8. Prohibition on use of herbicides to control ground cover.
9. Residents rights to repurchase their property at fair
market value.
vI. Host community Improvement Fund
This fund has been extended to cover the area within the
proposed rail corridor.
summary
The primary purpose of the proposed modifications to the
permit conditions and operating policies is to extend to the
residents of the rail corridor the same protections now offered to
residents of the landfill area. A secondary purpose is to modify
the landfill and train operating hours to reflect the hauling of
waste by rail.
The proposed modifications are consistent with, and further
extend, the work of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee which
developed the original conditions and policies adopted by the
Board. In this respect, the Planning Staff supports their adoption
and recommends that the Commission favorably consider these
modifications.
4
`~, lr~"~Q .:~.I.f j ~l~~~l'ill ~~J~j ~'~(~~(~~-{ ~1~ 5~~./~;~ild > ,~''ll ~`~~,v'~)~~v ~~~ `, ~~\\~ ~ ~ i
~'~,(,I,~ crfy-~ `~~~ I• / r .~.rP ,, ~~// ~', ~ ~, .,~~, fir. ~/ ., ~+~ ~!
, f ~" III // ', .II :,~..IfoA.,, 111 11 /,., .' X11 ~ /~ 0 vr.
/rJ,,,y ti !t. 7 1 I,jl 111, 1I ~~II, /. :.,,, l1 ~ . f ~ ! I -~ ~ f~ ~~` 6
1 A" ,/ 1p~~ /~ /'/ /~~li/~) i .~I ~/~;'~l~/,/ •~ ~ J/\/\t ~~~1• I~"' • ~ ~1\\` 1`,1~!\` I~ II~ 1 I~ `,~ ~ (~~~~ `'_~
//1 I.( '111• ~, / ~ , ,'1 •` • \ ~/ 11.. - \ ~, ~~
! /// ~ ~+f ~•~ t
f ~ ~ ~ f1 ~~,(: .lff1 / ~)~JJ~ 1 ' ~ f f `.. .~ v ~ 1 t 'u ~ 1•: (~. 1 ~ „~~ +`
. \ y ' ~~ ..~1 I III
. ~// ' ,,I, ~ 1111. ~ ~._~
. ~ ~,~
Av v u~ . ,t ~f l j _ l60p f.
~,1~~ - •la . .~ I ;+~ .I ii~CP+ ~ ~~. ~/. J~~II '~~IY Gr ~e , r ~1 N' ~ ll , ~
;1 ~ % • ' ~-~- ,. i1 '~ :~. I ~"~ r! I 1111
.~ ~ J ~ • /111 •ti ,,' I , ' 1 ~ ..' ~ ,11 ~~ r :~ ,I .„.
•1 _ : ; , ~1
"bi , .' _ ~ ~ ~: ~' Rail Corridor Map ~ •
1,1I ~' ~ ~ •;,~o ~ ;.~i itj1:,~ •.'•'' ail f .~~ ~"' ~ ~ Rail Corridor ~ `~~°
I I N ~ • •') ' II
;:~ ,:.. /
7 i., '' ~~~:.~~ \.'1,.11 .L'' '<:~~~; fa ,` '•''~•:
r •
11!~I • • P~.. ; ' ;,. ~ :1 ~ - .``~•~ - ' ~~~ '.;~.. ~,. ~, Preliminary Rail ..~
~`•'i~`•'1 ;;~ < 1,51 ~ ~1 ,. ,n~.~ ~)~~, ,1f,.. ,~ ~ I ll~ c.' Spur Location
11~~ ,, ,I .~,+..fl •,I/,. 1..I~,I~~' 1)I~ ~ ~~ \<< '~ ~,-~)2?_ •~. ~ deb. '~ ~ -~ \ ~ ~ :•, oa--•~. )
11 ~ fl, C I,I 1 •,. ~ ~1 .--i ~en~~ , 111 `_ ~~• ;•;. ; .1" ~``• ~~ ~...'~~~
,,; ~ 1 _ ~:. ~ .~
1. I ~ /\ ~I ~ `I I 1 , ~ `~ 111 ~ ~'~. ~'% f 1 /i00 , ~ ,'III ~'~ •!y\1~, `1: ~_ `.. ` ?
Il' .. : a.. 'lit , ~ '~~ • ~ ~\ r Il: ~ C ~ iUl (! . ,1 . II •''' ~1 '' -~ ~ i
..,,•,I ,, I;~ '.',1 11 I 1.I,I'I~\ ;I ,,,.,~~ , ~ 11„ j ~\ ~_ '~~ ~+•h .~\~1 ~'.~~• •+'Y~`l .(~l.
./ ,FF ~ ~ 1 d ~; (~'~\ 111, I ~ y , ~ ,~\• •l ~~ 1 ~. •.
111',, II/ 1. 1~1'~711, •11 ~I, : f~ 1~~~1 '~~' I. ~\1 ~ 1• i0 I , r, \ ier J~~ `~ ~
,h ~ I I,II, •1\\•~t 1 ~ ~~'~ ° I /. fF~~l~`•: 1 ~I .~ d ~ `1111 i'f. /1' (11( '~J~~ •' ~ 1 ~' 1
I I II , I I I~ ll. ~ • l 1 `1~ ~. ~~ ! Il~/• 111 { ~1~.. ~~ i•• ;~' _
4R~ _ 1;,11_ f ~~ ~ ~ '~ - ~<~~ ~ .- ,r ~ _ t ~ Fc
--.:a _.) ('1, ..~~., ~` ail' ~ ; ~~" / ~-^-.
-r ,/ ; `~~ 11 ,~f I1, ~~ It,l'~J(I"~ ~~ \J ,~' II `' ~~9 f!~w~ar~~~r~/
,:
~•,4.-~ ~~ 1 I \~~~• +\ ~ Cern~~ -.'L` .. ~N~'-t~l ~ I~1 ~~~ /~~~ '~~ ~• ~ ,~ •1))•'.~1 ~ 1~J
//~>-,~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
RESOLIITION GRANTING A BPECIAL IISE PERMIT AND
AMENDING CONDITIONS AND OPERATING POLICIES TO
THE ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY FOR THE
SMITH GAP SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY,
LOCATED IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on November 7, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter on November 19,
1991; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of amendments to
the Special Exception Permit conditions and operating policies for
the solid waste disposal facility at the Smith Gap site is
substatially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan
pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended.
2. That this action is taken upon the petition of the
Roanoke County Resource Authority.
3. That this action amends the Resolution 62789-12 of this
Board adopted on June 27, 1989.
4. That the Board hereby grants a Special Exception Permit
to the Roanoke County Resource Authority (and upon its creation and
1
~~
approval by the State Corporation Commission, its successor, the
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority) to publicly own and operate a
solid waste disposal facility on what is known as the "Smith Gap
Site" located on 640.39 acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis
Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road in the Catawba
Magisterial District, subject to the amended landfill permit
conditions and operating policies, which are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
5. That the Board acknowledges, to the extent permitted by
law, that the Authority has a non-binding moral obligation to pay
such amounts as may be needed to address the adopted operating
policies, including property value protection, and that such
payment is subject to future appropriations. Nothing in the
approved operating policies shall be deemed to constitute the
creation of a debt, the lending of the credit, nor a pledge of the
credit of the County under the Constitution and laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, nor shall any provision thereof give any
person any legal right to enforce the terms thereof against the
County or the Authority.
6. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All resolutions or
parts of resolutions in conflict with the provisions of this
resolution be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp51\agenda\landfill\spnseper.res
2
~ / ~` ,~ -'
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
ROANOKE COUNTY
LANDFILL PERNIIT CONDITIONS
AND
OPERATING POLICIES
MarcL 1991
TABL$ OF CONTENTS
Paste Number
Permit Conditions
Types of Waste. 1
Operating Hours 1
Operating Controls. 2
Active Fill Areas 4
Environmental Monitoring. 4
Screening and Buffering 5
Site Security 7
Fire Protection and Public Water. 9
Site Rejection. 9
Policies
Groundwater Protection 10
Property Value Protection 13
Appeals 15
Landfill Ownership. 15
Landfill Users. 16
Landfill Operational Priorities 16
Road Improvements and Access. 17
Hazardous Waste Collection. 18
Host Community Improvement Fund 18
Board of Supervisors Action
Board Report Adopting the Roanoke County
Landfill Permit Conditions and Operating
Policies . 19
Resolution Granting Special Exception
Permit for Boones Chapel Site 22
Resolution Granting Special Exception
Permit for Smith Gap Site 24
TABL$ OF CONTENTS
AMENDMENTS
Page Number
Permit Conditions
Types of Waste. 1
Operating Hours 1
Operating Controls. 2
Environmental Monitoring. 4
Screening and Buffering 5
Site Security 7
Policies
Groundwater Protection 10
Property Value Protection 13
Landfill Ownership. 15
Landfill Operational Priorities 16
Rail Access 17
Host Community Improvement Fund 18
Rail Corridor Establishment 19
Miscellaneous 19
Roanoke County Resource Authority Actions
P E R M I T C O N D I T I O N S
TYPES OF WASTE
In order to protect surrounding residents and prolong the life
of the Landfill site, the following conditions are made concerning
the types of waste that may be accepted.
1. No hazardous waste will be allowed at any time during the
entire life of the Landfill.
2.
. Wastes designated as "special
wastes" shall be disposed of in separate sections of the areas designated for
sanitary waste.
~3. Non-hazardous Incinerator Ash may be disposed of 3x--a
as a special waste in the new
Landfill.
r4. Only properly approved waste may be accepted, with the
main objective always being to safely dispose of
materials and prolong the useful life of the Landfill.
OPERATING HOURS
In consideration of the adjoining neighborhoods, it is
recommended that the following operating limits be placed on the
new facility:
1. Normal working hours shall be:
Delivery of Waste
by Authorized Vehicle
Monday-Friday Saturday
8:OOam-S:OOpm 8:OOam-3:30pm
Delivery of Waste
by Rail
Operation of all
Equipment
7.•OOpm-12: DOpm 7.•OOpm-12:OOpm
8:OOam-8:OOpm 8:OOam-6:30pm
1 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
2. Emergency operations shall allow for extended hours on
all days and Sundays whenever an emergency has been duly
declared by the Roanoke County Administrator.
3 :~~~-i e~e~~e~g~-e
~3. Operating hours can only be changed by action of the
Board of Supervisors, after public notice and hearing.
OPERATING CONTROLS
Effective control over potential Landfill pests and nuisances
are of great concern to all residents surrounding the Landfill
site. The following policies are designed to minimize such
nuisances:
1. Noise
a. Noise levels generated by the Landfill machinery and
equipment may not exceed the following amounts:
80 db (decibels) - Landfill site borders
65 db (decibels) - Surrounding residences
b. Landfill operations vehicles must be equipped with
the best possible muffler or exhaust system
available to minimize noise.
2. Dust
a. Fugitive dust emissions will be monitored by an
authorized agent of Roanoke. County or by the
Landfill Operators for compliance with state
regulations.
b. Problem areas arising during dry seasons will be
controlled with water.
c. Access roads should be cleaned and dust controlled
with water if excessive amounts of dust are
generated.
2 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
d. Any fill area of intermediate cover must be seeded
in vegetative cover within 30 days of fill.
3.
4.
Odor
a. Odor problems will be minimized if the Landfill
operation is conducted properly and active fill
areas are covered daily.
b. If problem odors exist that adversely impact
surrounding residents, deodorizing agents will be
used.
c. All holding tanks for Leachate collection systems
shall be in enclosed underground structures.
Lights
a. Sufficient lighting must be maintained at all times
to facilitate normal operations and to provide
adequate security over the Landfill site.
b. Lighting must be directed inward to keep the main-
body of light and glare off surrounding residents.
c. Adjoining property owners will be consulted as to
light placement, direction and height.
d. Lighting shall be limited to fixtures attached to
buildings as necessary for security and operations
and freestanding poles of not more than 16 feet in
height, and no lights shall exceed one footcandle
of light measured at the base of the pole or
structure.
5. Pests
a. A bonded, licensed pest control company will be
retained by the Landfill Agency throughout the
active life of the Landfill to provide preventive
inspections and treatments.
b. Adjoining property owners who incur pest problems
that are proven to be directly related to the
Landfill operation must be provided proper
extermination at the expense of the Landfill Agency.
c. Breeding areas for flying insects must be treated
as often as is necessary to prevent the breeding
cycle.
3
PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
6. A telephone number will be provided for use of
surrounding residents including tftose in the rail corridor to call in
complaints about noise, dust, odor, or pests. These
calls will be recorded and corrective actions documented.
ACTIVE FILL AREAS
The active areas of the landfill are regulated by the Virginia
Department of Waste Management. Strict guidelines are specified
in the regulations; however, the Landfill Citizens Advisory
Committee feels that active areas shall be designed to allow for
final cover as soon as possible.
Fill areas should be designed as far as practical from
adjoining properties to provide maximum buffering, and in no case
should extend within 100 feet of the Landfill boundary line.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
1. The responsible Landfill Agency must have all landfill
facilities inspected at least annually by a qualified
independent contractor to determine compliance with all
special exception permit conditions and all other landfill
conditions. Any violations must be reported to the
responsible Landfill Agency and shall be made public
information and the Landfill Agency shall take whatever steps
are necessary to immediately correct the violations.
2. The responsible Landfill Agency will be required to log all
complaints from any adjoining residents or businesses of the
landfill and rail corridor and all reasonable and legitimate complaints
shall receive the proper attention and shall be corrected
immediately. The complaint log shall be open to public
inspection.
4 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
SCREENING AND BUFFERING
Adequate screening and buffering is a paramount concern of the
Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. Effective screening and
buffering can reduce or mitigate the adverse impacts of noise, dust
and light from the landfill on adjoining properties, as well as
improve the visual appearance of the landfill operation. In
addition, landscaping of obtrusive buildings and active areas
within the landfill can reduce the visual blight from improved
properties which are above and overlook the landfill site.
Finally, minimizing the size of active and disturbed areas and
immediate seeding of these areas once activity ceases can further
reduce this visual blight.
To address these items, the following standards are
recommended. Additional requirements may be formulated for site
specific conditions upon review of the proposed landfill sites.
Any modification shall be subject to such site specific
circumstances, as determined by the Director of Planning.
1. The following buffer yard and plantings shall be
established around the perimeter of the landfill
property, except adjacent to an existing residential
property or public or private right-of-way. Trees shall
be planted in three separate rows or in clusters, where
natural land characteristics allow within the buffer
yard.
- 50 foot buffer yard;
- Three large deciduous trees with an ultimate height
of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer
yard;
- Five large evergreen trees with an ultimate height
of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer
yard; and,
- Seven small evergreen trees with an ultimate height
of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer
yard.
2. In areas adjacent to an existing residential property or
public or private right-of-way, the following shall be
established and maintained around the perimeter of the
landfill property. Trees shall be planted in three
separate rows or in clusters, where natural land
characteristics allow within the buffer yard.
- 100 foot buffer yard;
- Six large deciduous trees with an ultimate height
of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer
yard;
5 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
- Ten large evergreen trees with an ultimate height
of 50 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of buffer
• yard; and
- Fifteen small evergreen trees with an ultimate
height of 15 feet or greater per 100 linear feet of
buffer yard.
3. The buffer yard may only be used for passive recreation,
such as pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails provided
that:
- No plant material is eliminated;
- The total width of the buffer is maintained; and,
- All other requirements and conditions are met.
4. Buildings, active landfill areas, equipment storage areas
and other facilities shall be landscaped in such a manner
as to enhance (but not necessarily screen) the visual
appearance from adjoining properties.
5. The administrative standards and procedures contained
under Section 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance shall apply unless more restrictive or specific
standards are required above.
6. The rail line may or may not be able to be totally buffered by natural topography
or feasibly by normal screening methods. Where feasible, buffering will be
negotiated with the property owner during purchase negotiations.
6 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
SITE SECURITY
In compliance with State regulations, the following
suggestions are to make the landfill the most up to
date facility.
1. All facilities shall be surrounded on all sides by
natural barriers, fencing, or an equivalent means of
controlling vehicles access and preventing illegal
disposal. All access will be limited by gates, and such
gates shall be securable and equipped with locks.
a. All fencing utilized at the facility shall be
adequate to control unauthorized access.
b. Gates shall be at the main entrance as well as the
entrance to additional service areas.
2. Access to a solid waste disposal facility (landfill) shall be
permitted only when an attendant is on duty and only
during daylight hours, unless otherwise specified in the
facility permit, such as for rail delivery of waste.
3. Each solid waste disposal facility should be provided
with an adequately lighted and heated shelter where
operating personnel can exercise site control and have
access to essential sanitation facilities. Lighting,
heat and sanitation facilities may be provided by
portable equipment as necessary.
7 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
a. Dusk to dawn lights to be placed around buildings
and at each of the security gates.
4. All sanitary landfills will be equipped with permanent
or mobile telephone or radio communications.
a. The main security gate should be able to communicate
with all necessary areas of the landfill.
5. The operator is responsible for safety hazards to
operating personnel through an active safety program.
a. Security rules and regulations shall be posted at
each gate.
b. Security guard or landfill personnel shall be on
site 24 hours each day.
nuz-az~s ~T--nos-az=,-~~
6. All vehicle access points to the rail spur shall be properly gated with loch and
shall be posted with "No Trespassing" signs. Signs will also be posted at intervals
along the rail spur.
8 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
FIRE PROTECTION AND PUBLIC WATER
Fire protection for the site shall be provided on site with
adequate storage, distribution, and hydrants to properly extinguish
fires. The system shall be designed as a potable water system in
conformance with the standards of Roanoke County for the system
~ai~ may be deeded to Roanoke County for ownership and operation.
The system shall be designed to serve all on-site water needs as
well as being capable of serving adjoining properties.
Expansion of the water supply system, except when groundwater
contamination has been documented, shall be prohibited without
prior review for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. This
review shall follow the requirements and criteria outlined in
Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia, and shall also apply to
any proposal submitted under Section 15.1-475 (subdivision) and
Section 15.1-491(h) Site Plan Review, of the Code of Virginia.
SITE REJECTION
The Special Exception Permit for a landfill shall become null
and void upon official notification of the rejection of the site
by the Department of Waste Management or the date Roanoke County
selects not to submit a Part "B" application for the site.
9 PERMIT CONDITIONS
AMENDMENT
P O L I C I E S
GROUNDWATER PROTECTION
The single greatest concern of all residents surrounding a
landfill site is the potential contamination of groundwater
sources. Residents must be assured that the water supplies will
be protected at all times.
1. The responsible Landfill Agency will take all necessary
actions as required by state, federal or local laws or
regulations, including permit conditions to protect the
groundwater and water wells from contamination as a
result of the landfill construction and operation.
2. If private groundwater sources are contaminated as a
result of landfill leakage, construction, and/or
operation, the responsible Landfill Agency will, at its
expense, provide to each eligible resident or business
a clean source of replacement water.
a. The Landfill Agency may select any source of water
they so desire but it must meet all applicable
health standards. The newly established water
system will be extended to each residence or
business and connected at the Agency's expense
within 120 days after the date the contamination is
verified. All interior plumbing contaminated to
the extent that it is rendered hazardous for
continued use will be replaced at the Agency's
expense.
b. Eligible residents or businesses will receive free
water up to 6,000 gallons per month for as long as
they own and occupy the residence. All water usage
over 6,000 gallons per month will be paid by the
resident or business at the rates in effect at that
time. Heirs of residents will qualify for free
water under this provision.
c. The Landfill Agency agrees to continue to provide
water to subsequent owners of affected residences
or businesses. However, these residents or
businesses must pay the normal charge for water
services being paid by other County water users.
d. The Landfill Agency will provide water during the
interim period between providing a new source and
the well contamination.
10 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
3. This guarantee will remain in force for a period equal
to the State and EPA required monitoring period after
closure, but not less than 25 years.
4. To be eligible for groundwater protection, each
surrounding property owner (within 1,000 feet of landfill
property boundary) must sign an agreement and must agree
to allow water samples to be taken and tested at the
Landf i 11 Agency' s expense . All property owners in the rail corridor are
eligible forgroundwater protection only after a derailment of waste along the spur
line or if contamination from the landfill is detected from those wells being tested
quarterly. The Resource Authority will remain responsible to the property owners
during a derailment. However, Norfolk Southern may be ultimately responsible
under the transportation contract:
a. For all wells in existence before the opening of the
landfill, the initial water sample must pass all
health standards and must include the chemical and
bacteria tests.
b. All eligible residents or businesses must allow
water samples to be taken on a quarterly basis for
testing by the Landfill Agency. All testing is to
be done at the Landfill Agency's expense.
c. For all wells which pass the initial test, if
subsequent tests show contamination, it will qualify
under the terms of this agreement for guaranteed
replacement, unless the Landfill Agency can prove
that the source of the contamination is not the
landfill.
d. For all wells that fail the initial test, the exact
nature of the existing contamination must be
recorded and sufficient additional tests taken to
establish an accurate base-line of data against
which to compare future tests. If future tests
demonstrate a deterioration of water contamination
the well will qualify under the terms of this
agreement for guaranteed replacement.
e. All new wells drilled (within 1,000 feet of the
landfill property boundary) during the life of the
landfill that pass an initial water sample test
(chemical and bacteria) will qualify for groundwater
protection under the terms of this agreement.
5. All surrounding property owners 5,000 feet of the
landfill property boundary may elect to have .their water
11 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
tested at the Landfill Agency's expense. This will be
a one-time only test prior to the opening of the
landfill, and is to include chemical and bacteria
analysis.
6. A Contingency Plan must be designed and approved, for
providing potable water to surrounding residents covered
under this agreement, prior to the opening of the
landfill.
7.
The Landfill Agency will escrow sufficient money from
landfill tipping fees to guarantee fulfillment of this
agreement.
12 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
PROPERTY VALUE PROTECTION
A second major concern of residents surrounding the landfill
site is the potential devaluation of their property. This is
particularly true since people's homes usually represent the
majority of their assets. Residents must be assured that their
property values will be protected.
1. The responsible Landfill Agency will take all necessary
actions as required by federal, state or local laws or
regulations, including landfill permit conditions, to
insure residents surrounding the landfill site that their
property values will not be adversely impacted by the
landfill.
2. Any resident or business owning property within 5,000
feet of the landfill site border on the day the site
receives approval of the Part "B" application and
issuance of a permit by the Department of Waste
Management, and the site is selected for development by
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, may be eligible
for compensation if they can prove their property was
devalued as a result of the landfill. Any resident or business
owning property within the rail corridor on the day that construction begins on
the rail spur may be eligible for compensation if they can prove their property was
devalued as a result of the rail spur.
3. The resident must establish the value of the affected
property just prior to the sale date (Appraised Value)
by either obtaining an appraisal by a "Professionally
Certified Appraiser" or by use of the current Roanoke
County or Montgomery County tax assessments. Tax
assessments must reflect 100$ of fair market value. The
responsible Landfill Agency will pay 50$ of the cost of
the initial appraisal up to a total of $150. Appraisals
to be made as if landfill was not existing.
4. Any resident who sells their property for an amount (Sale
Value) which is less than the Appraised Value determined
under paragraph 3 will be eligible for compensation from
the responsible Landfill Agency for the amount of this
difference, subject to the following conditions:
a. The responsible Landfill Agency must be given the
"Right of First Refusal" to buy any property for
which a bona fide offer to purchase has been
received in an amount below the Appraised Value.
13 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
b. The responsible Landfill Agency must exercise their
rights under paragraph 4a within 30 days of the date
they are notified by the resident of a bona fide
purchase offer.
c. Appraisal shall take into account condition of
property.
5. The foregoing agreement to compensate residents for loss
in property values will only apply to properties sold
before the termination date, which is defined as 5 years
after the date the landfill is closed. Heirs of
residents qualifying under paragraph 2 will be eligible
for compensation under the terms of this agreement.
6. Any resident who is eligible for compensation for
property devaluation under the foregoing terms of this
agreement will also qualify for reimbursement of the
following expenses:
a. Residents or renters will receive reasonable Moving
Expenses to move to a new location within ~e
25 miles of existing residence.
Moving expenses are limited to the costs of
transporting household goods. Requires three (3)
written quotes approved by the Landfill Agency.
Payments to be made within 60 days of approved expenses.
b. Residents or renters will receive reimbursement for
the Interest Differential between their existing
mortgage loan and any new loan assumed on any
replacement property within ~e-be~~~s-a=
25 miles of existing residence . This
reimbursement will be defined as the present value
of the remaining principal payments, discounted at
the difference between the interest rates on the
original loan and on the replacement loan. Payments
to be made within 60 days of the new loan closing.
7. It shall be the responsibility of the resident to carry
adequate property insurance to cover any loss hazards.
In the event that a total loss does occur, the Landfill
Agency will compensate the resident (who qualifies under
the preceding terms of this agreement) for the difference
between the Assessed Value and the Insurance Settlement.
However, if the Insurance Settlement is for any amount
less than the Sale Value, the amount of compensation will
14 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
be the difference between the Assessed Value and the Sale
Value. For purposes of this provision, the Sale Value
is understood to be• the Replacement Value of the property
on the date of the insurance loss.
APPEALS
In order to provide a timely and inexpensive method for
parties that may be damaged by the landfill permit conditions and
policies, any disagreement between a property owner and the
responsible Landfill Agency concerning groundwater contamination
or property value damage, the matter may be resolved through the
provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act, Article 2 of Title 8.01
of the Code of Virginia (Section 8.01-581.01 et sect).
LANDFILL OWNERSHIP
The citizens of Roanoke County feel strongly that the landfill
operator needs to be responsive and accountable for properly
operating, maintaining, and adhering to the conditions placed on
the permit.
The
Landfill Agency shall remain in full control and accountable for the
construction and operation of the landfill. And will be accountable for
the proper transportation of waste under the Norfolk Southern transportation contract.
15 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
LANDFILL USERS
The responsible Landfill Agency shall limit users of the
Regional Landfill to qualifying residents and businesses of Roanoke
County, Roanoke City, Salem and Vinton. Private haulers will be
allowed to use the landfill only if the refuse that is submitted
originates from one of the municipalities previously mentioned and
if they have applied for and obtained a dump permit from the
Landfill Operator.
Surrounding counties and municipalities who elected not to
participate in the Regional Landfill on the date Part "A"
application was made to the Virginia Department of Waste Management
(VDWM) will not be allowed to use the landfill.
LANDFILL OPERATIONAL PRIORITIES
Siting and permitting a new landfill under current VDWM
regulations is extremely complex and difficult. This is true for
technical reasons but also due to the adverse impact on surrounding
residents. The Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee feels that the
following priorities must be used to guide the Landfill Operator
and Board in making all future policy determinations. These are
listed in priority order below:
1. Protection of the environment of the Roanoke Valley
Service Area.
2. Protection or extension of the useful life of the
landfill.
3. Protection of the interests of the residents of the
landfill host community.
4. Protection of the interests of the residents of the rail corridor.
~5. Minimization of landfill operating costs.
r6. Minimization of landfill tipping fees.
16 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCESS
Safe and adequate roadways leading to the landfill is a great
concern of the residents of Roanoke County. Properly constructed
and maintained roads are critical in the protection and safety of
the adjoining neighborhoods and motorists. The following
conditions are an attempt to address these issues:
1. With the construction of the landfill and prior to its
opening, all secondary roads utilized as the main access
to the landfill will be reconstructed to the appropriate
VDOT geometric design standards and pavement category to
safely handle the projected type and volume of traffic.
2. The Landfill Operator along with VDOT will properly
maintain the road in good, safe repair.
3. The Landfill Operator will keep the road and the
adjoining rights-of-way and properties free and clean of
litter and debris originating from vehicles traveling to
and from the landfill. Litter pickup is to be made a
minimum of twice a week, weather permitting.
4. Roanoke County will enforce speed limits along the access
roads to and from the landfill as part of regular
enforcement.
5. Roanoke County will work with the
impact of the additional landfill
Clearbrook Elementary School Zone
any landfill is opened on the Boon
RAIL ACCESS
VDOT to minimize the
traffic through the
of Route 220 South if
es Chapel site.
Safe and adequate rail lines to the landfill is a great concern of the residents of the rail
corridor. Properly constructed and maintained rail lines are critical in protection and safety of
the adjoining neighborhoods. The following conditions are an attempt to address these issues:
1. Adequate access controls and proper posting of the rail line shall be provided.
2. The number of train runs per day will be kept to a minimum.
3. Train speed shall not exceed 25 miles per hour.
17 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
4. Grade crossings should be of asphalt or other surfacing material other than
grave
S. Train whistles should be kept to a minimum and only when necessary.
6. Train runs should be as early as possible considering timing, scheduling, traffic
and operating controls.
7. Spur line shall be for landfill traffic only.
8. Ground cover and weeds shall not be controlled by use of toxic herbicides.
9 If, after purchase of property for the rail spur, the Landfill Agency or railroad
determines that the rail will not be used to transport waste to the landfill, the
property owners will have the right to repurchase their property at the fair market
value.
HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION
The landfill presently being sited in Roanoke County is
strictly for sanitary municipal solid waste. Since no hazardous
waste will be allowed, it is important for the Regional Landfill
service area to provide a means of disposing of hazardous waste.
The responsible Landfill Agency or Board will develop and make
public information for the proper disposal of hazardous waste.
HOST COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT FUND
A Host Community Improvement Fund will be established through
donations from the Landfill Agency for the purpose of public
improvements ~e for the Host Community. The Host Community is
defined as the area within 5, 000 feet of the landfill along with the rail
corridor. Donations will be made annually in amounts of $10,000;
however, the fund shall never exceed $150,000. The fund shall be
utilized for the construction and maintenance of public
improvements to Landfill Agency property approved by the Board of
Supervisors and the Planning Commission. A Public Improvement Plan
shall be developed by Roanoke County with assistance from the
residents of the Host Community for the expenditure of the fund.
18 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
RAIL CORRIDOR ESTABLISHMENT
The rail corridor has been established to identify the area adjacent to the rail spur that
may be influenced by the transportation of waste and the construction of the new lines Each
property owner will be adequately and fairly compensated for arty land acquired for the
construction of the rail line and any residue damage, if any. Those other adjoining properties
may experience some effects associated with the transportation waste along the rail spur as those
adjoining properties of the landfill and, therefore, should be afforded similar protection.
The rail corridor has been established and limited to those properties that adjoin the rail
spur property and those properties between the rail spur and State Routes 603, 629, and 622
north of existing N&W tracks as shown on the "Rail Corridor" map.
MISCELLANEOUS
T{re railroad's responsiveness to complaints and claims is of great concern of the rail
corridor residents. The Landfill Agency will make all efforts to assist the residents in satisfying
rheir concerns and obtaining quick response and resolve from the railroad.
Reimbursements for legitimate livestock claims will be resolved and paid within 60 days.
19 POLICIES
AMENDMENT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION
. -~
ACTION NO. _
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: November 19, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN
CWY, INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF
BERKLEY COURT SUBDIVISION, AND THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, IN CONNECTION WITH VINYARD PARK
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ - '' ~~ ~ `~ -~~ '` ~=- ~ ~-~= '~''
<<~-- Jy
-~y~
r,;
EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY
This is the first readi g of the proposed ordinance to
authorize conveyance of a perpet al easement, fifteen feet (15') in
width, for sanitary sewer pur oses, and a perpetual easement,
twenty feet (20') in width, fo drainage purposes, to CWY, INC.,
the developer of Berkley Cour Subdivision, in exchange for a
perpetual access easement, fifteen in width, to the County of
Roanoke for Vinyard Park.
By deed of gift, dated December 27, 1984, and corrected deed
of gift dated January 17, 1985, Walter Darnall Vinyard and
Claiborne Wood Vinyard conveyed unto the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, a certain tract of land situate in the
City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, containing 41.297 acres,
for park and recreational purposes. This property is commonly
known as Vinyard Park.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
CWY, INC., a Virginia corporation, is currently developing
Berkley Court Subdivision in the Town of Vinton. As part of the
development plan for the subdivision, CWY, INC., needs to acquire
a 15' sanitary sewer easement and a 20' drainage easement upon,
over, under, and across a portion of the above-referenced property,
which lies in the Town of Vinton and is owned by the County of
Roanoke. A copy of the plat showing the location of these proposed
easements is attached.
The preliminary development plans have been reviewed and
approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The
proposed easements have been reviewed by the Department of Parks
and Recreation, and they do not conflict with present or proposed
County use of Vinyard Park.
The development of Berkley Court Subdivision will, however,
eliminate access which has previously been used by Roanoke County
for entering and maintaining Vinyard Park. An alternate access,
over and across a granted easement for ingress and egress, in such
location as is satisfactory with the County Department of
Engineering and Inspections and Department of Parks and Recreation,
would be acceptable and would constitute fair consideration for the
easements to CWY, Inc..
FISCAL IMPACTS•
No monetary consideration has been offered to the County of
Roanoke by the developer.
ALTERNATIVES•
(i) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for
conveyance, without consideration due to the ultimate public
benefit, of the above-described easements to CWY, INC.
(2) Authorize the County Administrator to sell the easements
to CWY, INC., for consideration equal to forty percent (40$) of the
tax assessed value of the easement area, which consideration would
be in accordance with the guidelines followed by County Staff in
acquiring easements.
(3) Decline to authorize conveyance of the easements.
(4) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for
conveyance of the above-described easements to CWY, INC., in
exchange for conveyance of an acceptable 15' access easement to the
County of Roanoke for ingress and egress to and from Vinyard Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed Ordinance
in accordance with Alternative #4 above.
Res ectfully submitted,
Vickie L. Hu a
Assistant County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1991
ORDINANCE AIITHORISING EBCHANGE OF EABEMENTB BETWEEN CWY,
INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF BERRLEY COIIRT
BIIBDIVISION, AND THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, IN CONNECTION
WITH VINYARD PARR
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
is the owner of a tract of land situate in the City of Roanoke and
the Town of Vinton, containing 41.297 acres, which is used for park
and recreational purposes and is commonly known as Vinyard Park;
and,
WHEREAS, CWY, INC., a Virginia corporation, is currently
developing an adjoining parcel of land known as Berkley Court
Subdivision in the Town of Vinton; and,
WHEREAS, CWY, INC., needs to acquire a 15' sanitary sewer
easement and a 20' drainage easement upon, over, under, and across
a portion of the Vinyard Park property; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed easements do not conflict with the
present or proposed County use of Vinyard Park, but the County does
need an access easement for entering and maintaining Vinyard Park;
and,
WHEREAS, acquisition of an acceptable access easement for
Vinyard Park constitutes a fair consideration for the conveyance of
the sanitary sewer and drainage easements to CWY, INC.; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the exchange
of said interests in real estate was held on November 19, 1991; and
a second reading was held on December 3, 1991.
THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the subject easement areas do not
conflict with other public uses and will ultimately serve a public
purpose, and are hereby declared to be surplus; and,
2. That conveyance to CWY, INC., of the 15' sanitary sewer
easement and the 20' drainage easement upon, over, under, and
across a portion of the Vinyard Park property, located in the Town
of Vinton, as shown upon the Easement Plat dated October 3, 1991,
made by Balzer and Associates, Inc., attached hereto, is hereby
authorized.
3. That the consideration for said easements shall be
conveyance to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of an
acceptable 15' access easement for ingress and egress to and from
Vinyard Park, the acceptance of which is hereby authorized upon
concurrence of the Board of Supervisors by resolution; and,
4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as may be necessary to accomplish the exchange, all of which
shall be on form approved by the County Attorney.
ti~
ih
Q~ ,
0
c~ ~ ~., ~I
[h~ ~ i
E'
4•b hGP~
~ i
~~
~ ~ ~/
h
~iF ~/
RoANO~('E Co. W 0
l3oARD of ~Q•!~ I
SuRERVisoRS of
17•!3./si5, pG.G57/N ~
. MAC I~ ~
558°59 %3 "W o~ E /
29.h~/'
FOYG4N0 .Q VE. S..< ,_.
64! 50' _./ -mil I - , % ia.~:.~~
/ 2 ' ALL Ey -~, 8&.03 i ARa
/ ~
_~ _ ~/
ccEAn~s ~N£R / PROP. ~
,CANT/EM BFCknl6Q L3E'R X~
D.~i.55/, PG. 309 ~ ~ Y C~
' j ~ l{~. -' I ~ I ....
~ I W/LL/AM P. Y/NYARD
o I p• a• /G z7, I,oG, 380
ICI
~I I
,E~ M s rf?~~T
~o /,e/w
Fox ,c ~NO -t
P. Q. /~ PG. 2 5~
~~kl
EASEMENT PLAT
FOR
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
AND
15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TOWN OF VIN'TON, VIRGINIA
OCIL~B);'R 3, 1991
JOB NUMBER 91097
~~~ ~~~
~~
~lJ Ronald R. Clark
No. 1745
PLANNERS •AR~HITECTS • ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS•
1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA..772-95$0
OF pOANp~~
A
ti ~ ~ p
Z
2
v ^: a~
/x~ 150 0 0
1 V LEAFS QQ
SFSQ(IICENTENN~P~
:~ Beauti~ulBeginnin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
~LI~~MERICA CITY
C~~~~~
1979
1989
Mrs. Mary F. Parker,
Roanoke City Council
215 Church Avenue, S.
Roanoke, VA 24011
Dear Mary:
November 22, 1991
Clerk
W.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN
GTAWElA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE 8. EDDY
WINDSOR HILLS MAGSTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS
GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT
Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 111991-13 amending and
reenacting Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, of Chapter 18 of the
Roanoke County Code of 1985 (formerly Article III, of Chapter 16
of the Roanoke County Code of 1971). This ordinance was adopted
by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, November
19, 1991.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Mary H. llen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
QIIESTIONS FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY CITIZENS
PUBLIC HEARING
NOVEMBER 19, 1991
David Romney, Northfork Road:
1. Asked that residents on the other side of Route 603, in other
words the entire valley be afforded the same protection
regarding water quality and property values. All should be
given equal consideration.
Pat Lavery, 4769 Northfork Road
1. The residents on both sides of Route 603 need to know to what
extent the protections will be offered. Need clarification.
2. Asked for a larger geographically correct map that shows
exactly where the protection will be.
3. Devaluation of the land and homes is of major concern and
should not stop at Route 603 and Bradshaw Road but should
extend to the whole valley.
Ritty Harmon
1. Home abuts Route 603. Creek is 75 feet from the front porch.
Should have the same protection as other side of Route 603.
2. Asked what type of water testing will be done when the spur
is completed. What company will be doing the testing, who is
an authoritative source. What criteria will be used. Asked
that a water test be given both before and after the landfill
goes into operation.
3. Asked for legal form to fill out outlining protections.
letter from Lucille and Elmer Bower.
1. Resource Authority will take part of farm for trash train
through corn field that feeds their cattle. If corn field is
taken they will have to purchase feed. Who will be
responsible for the ruining of the family farm and cost to
feed the cattle?
2. Asked for legal confirmation that they will be compensated for
damages for the whole property and not just the trash train
right of way.
Letter from Ellen Thompson
1. Concerned about additional flooding, decrease in property
value. Want complete legal protection.
Louise Spangler
1. When was corridor established?
2. Presented information from Janet Y. Smith, Erosion and
Sediment Control Specialist, Division of Soil and Conservation
Branch at regional office at Dublin. Asked about an approved
erosion and sediment control plan that must be followed.
3. Sediment basins, etc. to trap sediment must be constructed as
first step before unsloped land disturbance takes place.
Separate drainage and protective basin should be every three
acres. Will Resource Authority do this?
4. Why doesn't the protected corridor cross the road?
5. What if flooding is more severe?
6. Asked that corridor be extended.
John Hubbard explained corridor was established prior to April 1991
and does not cross the road.
John Hubbard further explained that there was no protection
included for flooding because that area has always flooded. Will
occur in future regardless.
Montgomery County staff calculated flooding levels and felt that
flood increase will be minimal.
Steve asked John Hubbard to respond in writing with copies to the
Board. John Hubbard will answer by end of next week.
Bob Johnson reminded that rights of property owners are protected
by State of Virginia regardless of the side of the road. Even in
protected areas, the property owner will have to prove
contamination or decreased property value.
TRANSCRIPT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW'8 COMMENTS
YEAR-END SIIRPLIIS DISCIISSION
NOVEMBER 19. 1991
Supervisor McGraw: If you would drop back in history for a
moment to remind certain individuals of
the process we've been through for the
last eight years. When I first came on
this Board of Supervisors in 1984 there
were three of us who voted for a five cent
real estate tax rate increase later that
year, and the majority of that money went
into Schools, primarily for salaries. Um,
I think there was a three million dollar
increase that year, the largest single
increase for education in the history of
Roanoke County.
I was told then in my district, the
Catawba District that was very
conservative, that would put an end to my
political career and it did not in 1987.
And were I to be on this Board next year,
which I will not be, and I am looking
right now particularly at members of the
RCEA, I'll tell you that I would be in
favor of voting for a real estate tax rate
increase again, especially for education,
which I did in '84, and have pushed for
since then, every year - every year.
The process was politicized two weeks ago
when 25 or 30 or so teachers showed up
with RCEA members and came in and
attempted to influence this Board to spend
the $375, 000 then, just a few days before
the election. I didn't appreciate that
at all. I thought that was not the proper
way to approach the thing. When the two
cent tax rate reduction was passed by this
Board last year, I was the only one who
voted against it, primarily because I
didn't want to see the average Roanoke
County citizen save $16 a year and the
County budget lose $600,000 a year. Now,
those are the facts. What I can say to
you is you can look back at the elections
and it looks like the people of Roanoke
County wanted a more conservative Board
of Supervisors. Well, they're going to
get it. And what I say to you, is that
be careful what you ask for because
sometimes you just might get it.
OF ROANpK~
~ ,F i
~~
2
v a
/x~ 150
{/ YEANS 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A BeautifulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
A, ALI~AM
C~~~trt~ ~~ ~~~rt~r~~e 'I I'
I I
1979
1989
November 21, 1991
Mrs. Anne Renner
2131 Cantle Lane
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mrs. Renner:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STEVEN A. MCGRAW, CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE•CHAIRMAN
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT
At the Board of Supervisors Meeting on November 19, 1991, the
Health Department Board of Directors was designated as an inactive
organization. Until such time as Dr. Hagan, Director of the Health
Department, wishes to reactive the board, the County will not
appoint anyone to serve.
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors asked me to express to you
their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Health
Department Board of Directors. Allow me to personally thank you
for the time you served on this Board.
Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing
to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
Sincerely,
7~'La.Q-c~,~ .
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
MHA/bjh
cc: Dr. Margaret L. Hagan, Health Department Director
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004
~~
~.
~~
~~w
,2~
-~
y.'
~~ .
~'~
,~
~:
~4.
,_
~~~
~F (~
~-, -'
~~~ ~ ~~
`~ ~
,' W~
~_
~
~-
~.
~,t
.~i
O
H
Q~wua ~ ~
Q~x ~ z
~.
~~ p
O~?~- ~ O Q
f
j~ ~y_
1a/ J
U. ~ x ~ u
~" ~~ w
~ ~ ~.w ~,~~1 '.~
- ~/w:w~N ~
~~ ~ ~ ~~ -
~- z ~ -O V .~- ~ ~ ,t
o~ ~~ -~o
O~QOQ~ ~'~~Q
~wU,~~;~
~.E"Ew-~~w'V ~
~ ~ :~ ~ x
V~w~~ - u
~, ~~ ~
O '~w O ~ m
~~ ~ E-~ U ~
H
z
a
0
u
OF ROANp~~
~ ,~
Z
~ 2
v 'a
18~$ 150. $$
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
-l Beauti~ulBeginninR
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
~A1tn~LJ II~ ~II~tYtil~tF
AlL AMERICA CITY
'~II~'
1979
1989
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STEVEN A. MCGRAW. CHAIRMAN
UTAWEiA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY
WINDSOR HIL15 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS
UVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
November 20, 1991
Rev. F. Tupper Garden
Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church
1837 Grandin Road, S.W.
Roanoke, VA 24015
Dear Reverend Garden:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for attending the
meeting on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, to offer the invocation.
We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all
is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens.
Thank you for sharing your time with us.
Sincerely,
~ -~'~(' .
Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, at its meeting on November 19, 1991, at the
Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m.
will hold a public hearing on the following:
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE
ADDITION OF ARTICLE VIII. "FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS" TO
CHAPTER 16 "POLICE" TO REGULATE THE USE AND OPERATION OF
SECURITY AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
~~ -~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates:
November 10, 1991
November 17, 1991
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN
Post-lt'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 of pages -
-...., .r~- ~ ~ .
~c ~
Roanoke County ~-
Department of Economic Development
772-2069 ; ~~ i
CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDIIM
TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director
DATE: October 31, 1991
SIIBJECT: Traffic Signal at Colonnade
I met with Fred Altizer this morning to review and discuss plans
for a traffic signal to be installed on Route 419 at Colonnade.
VDOT has scheduled their contractor to start the project in mid-
November. Bruce Hobart has told them to wait pending the outcome
of discussions with Roanoke County. If delayed now, installation
would not occur until late January 1992.
Bruce Hobart has an agreement with VDOT to reimburse them half the
cost of installing the signal. The current estimated cost is about
$75,000. Billing would occur ninety (90) days after completion for
Bruce's share of $37,500.
I recommend that we contribute no more than $30,000 of public-
private partnership funds towards the installation of the traffic
signal with the following conditions:
1. Blue Cross/Blue Shield provides a letter of intent to Bruce
Hobart to locate in the Colonnade II building.
2. Bruce Hobart (Hobart Companies) contributes at least 10% of
the signal costs ($7,500).
In my opinion, our public-private partnership investment will
assist in inducing additional out-of-area prospects being courted
by the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, such that
a third building (Colonnade III) could be constructed.
I will prepare the Board report for the November 19 Board meeting
at your request.
sbo
WS - Design, Oper - Treatment Plant
Recognitions:
Harshbarger House
Elementary Art Teacher of the Year
Middle School Art Teacher of the Year
First Library in County
American Education Week
Street Light - Northside High School
Year-end Audit
TAP Funding for TLC
Policy Naming of Parks, buildings
Ord - Open BUrning
Fire Alarm
Sewer Use Standards
Soccer Field-Starkey Park
Reports - Youth Haven II
Noise Ordinance
Tourism
Setback Compliance
Lease-Purchase
Vinyard Park
PH - Rezone - M-2 to R-E West RIver Road
Rezone - A-1 to M-2 Berkley Road, Vinton
December 3
PH - Rke Valley Resource Authority
December 17
Weed Ord. enforcement
Status of 1991-92 budget
revenue projections
PH -
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community
Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning
Commission to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to bring an existing
nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning ordinance,
located at 5266 West River Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated : October 3 0 , 19 91 Yn-.G~~^ /'P ~ C~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, November 5, 1991
Tuesday, November 12, 1991
Direct the bill for publication to:
Roanoke County Planning Commission
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2068
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF BUPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community
Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning
Commission to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2 to A-1 to bring
an existing nonconforming use into conformance with the zoning
ordinance, located 0.8 mile northeasterly from the point of
intersection of Berkley Road and Norfolk & Southern railway, Vinton
and Hollins Magisterial Districts.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: October 30, 1991 ~,
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, November 5, 1991
Tuesday, November 12, 1991
Direct the bill for publication to:
Roanoke County Planning Commission
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2068
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANOKE COIINTY BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1991, in the Community
Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Resource
Authority to amend the Special Exception Permit conditions and
operating policies for the Smith Gap Landfill, located on 640.39
acres on the northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith
Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: October 30, 1991 ~ ~~~~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, November 5, 1991
Tuesday, November 12, 1991
Direct the bill for publication to:
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2005
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
~ ~~
~~, ~
~~ ~
..~~ d~,~
~~~
1 ,
~(Q °~`~~ h of America's democracy tomorrow
on the children in America's class-
~ay; and
~ public schools remain the surest
to a future more prosperous, more
dust, and more free; and
1NNE~iEAS, each community's public schools must prepare
the next generation for a new constellation of
social, economic, ethical, and political chal-
lenges; and
UIHEREAS, quality education demands the active involve-
ment and collaboration of all segments of the
community,
AI®~r, therefore,
.,
serving as
of
Do hereby proclaim
AMERICAN
E~UCAT~ON
WEEK
NOVEMBER y7-23, 7991
Schools ~ Communities
PARTNERS FOR
A STRONG AMERICA
_.~..
1
i2~~
---~-,'~
r~c~
Signed this day of
1991 .
~((
~1
~l
~~ - "J~
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF
NOVEMBER 11 - 17, 1990
AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK
WHEREAS, America's public schools serve all of the children of all of
the people; and
WHEREAS, the strength of a community Is measured by the schools
it keeps; and
WHEREAS, the schools of the 1990s need broad citizen support to
meet the diverse needs of today's families and to help each student achieve his
or her potential; and
WHEREAS, educational excellence is built on the involvement of the
entire community, Including parents, business leaders, elected officials, public
service personnel, and senior citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of November 11 through 17, 1990, as
AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK
and urge all citizens to observe this week with appropriate activities and to renew
their commitment to the education of every child.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto set our hands and caused
fhe seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this 13th day of
November, 1990.
Mary H. AI-en C-erk
~'C/
Richard W. Robers, airman
Steve,~p A. McGraw, Vice-Chairman
10/15/91
Mary Allen:
Marti Robinson called. Requested a presentation at November 19,
1991, Board Meeting at 3 p.m. for American Education Week
Proclamation. Week of November 17 - 23, 1991. Present will be
Kitty Boitnott, President, Roanoke County Education Association,
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Frank Thomas, Chairman, School
Board, and maybe one other.
He will send copy of sample proclamation and let us know for sure
who will be coming.
Brenda
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, a free public library system is one of the most important services that
can be provided by a local government; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club was responsible for
founding the public library system in Roanoke County in 1933, with a donation of 350
books and space in their clubhouse; and
WHEREAS, the library at the Conehurst Clubhouse served between 40 and 50
patrons per day during its first decade; and
WHEREAS, through the years, the Club was responsible for donating books,
facilities and workers to the library system; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Library System currently stocks over 230,000
books and serves over 1500 people per day, and is one of the most popular services
provided to citizens of Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of every resident of the Roanoke Valley,
does hereby extend its sincerest appreciation to the Roanoke County Junior Women's Club
for foresight and dedication in founding the Roanoke County Library System; and further
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes continued success to the
Junior Women's Club in all future projects.
TO: Ann Marie Green
FROM: Terry Harrington ~~'
DATE: October 21, 1991
RE: Harshbarger House
Please see the attached. Could we schedule a Board Resolution
for Mr. Truett commending him for his efforts to preserve this
landmark?
~:_ ..~ ary Allen
Jon Hartley
~ ~ ~ ~~
°~ ~Z
~,.~~,~~
a~~~
~' ,'~
~ v
~fl~~®N~~f~~,~'~ Of ~~R~~~~~
Hugh C. Miller, Director
October 11, 1991
Edward L. Truett
Golden Era Antiques
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond Virginia 23219
f t t~;A ,,.. TDD: (804) 786-1934
~;~ 1. ; ,; y 1'Qlcphgrte ~8pd) 786-31a3
r - : ~ . ~; ~ fiAX:1904). 225-4'261
t'.~ ~°
4
ocr ~ ~ ,
+i
~~~ICf ;.~1ca~'~'
Box 111
Cloverdale, VA 24077
RE: HARSHBARaER HOUSE, Roanoke County (DHR SO-13)
Dear Mr. Truett:
On behalf of the Commonwealth, it gives me great pleasure to inform you
that the state Board of Historic Resources has placed Harshbarger House on the
Virginia Landmarks Register and has endorsed its being nominated to the
National Register of Historic Places. We will be forwarding the nomination to
the National Park Service following final review by Department staff.
The Virginia Landmarks Register was established by an act of the General
Assembly in 1966 and includes "the buildings, structures, and sites which are
of statewide or national significance." It is our judgment that Harshbarger
House richly deserves this official recognition as one of the Commonwealth's
historic resources.
The National Register of Historic Places is maintained by the National
Park Service of the Department of the Interior. I am hopeful that the Keeper
of the National Register will approve our nomination and place Harshbarger
House on this official list of the nation's historic places.
The protection of registered Virginia landmarks is of immediate concern
to this office. It is our hope that you will let us know if we can be of any
assistance in the preservation of this property. Many times our staff can
offer advice to owners who contemplate alterations or renovations of their
properties, and we welcome the opportunity to serve.
Sincerely,
~. ~. I~,lr.~
Hugh Miller
Dire for
Enclosure
Edward L. Truett
Harshbarger House, Roanoke County
cc: The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane
Member, Virginia Senate
The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr.
Member, Virginia Senate
The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell
Member, Virginia House of Delegates
The Honorable G. Steven Agee
Member, Virginia House of Delegates
The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum
Member, Virginia House of Delegates
The Honorable A. Victor Thomas
Member, Virginia House of Delegates
Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Elmer C. Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
Terrance Harrington, Director
Roanoke County Planning Department
Kyle Robinson, Chairman
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Wayne Strickland, Executive Director
Fifth Planning District Commission
Gibson Worsham, Consultant
R-91091-9
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE WITH ITEM 2 REMOVED FOR
SEPARATE VOTE - URC
1. Approval of Minutes - August 13, 1991
2. Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Moose
Lodge
A-91091-9.a
BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE
AYES-LBE,RWR,BI.,T,HCN
ABSTAIN-SAM
3. Acknowledgements from VDOT of additions,
renumberings, discontinuances and abandonment from
the Secondary System.
A-91091-9.b
4. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring
Elementary School PTA.
A-91091-9.c
K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED ABOUT POLICY FOR NANIING OF
PARKS. ECH TO BRING BRICK POLICY IN 90 DAYS (11/19/91) (2)
+•~~~ ' '~ ~ ~~•~~ A~/! 1rT.T~iw ~.\ • !9T\ I9TTT-/Tw.T
October 23, 1991
MA: ECH and I talked about the Oct. 22 action agenda and the
upcoming reports that he is responsible for. On the weed ordinance
report due 12-17 and the tourism report due 11-19, he says please
put on your planning board.
He will have Diane Hyatt schedule a meeting of the Audit
Committee at 2 p.m. on 11-19.
M H
cc - Diane Hyatt
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Article
III, Sewer Use Standards of Chapter 16 Code of 1971
(Chapter 18, Code of 1985)
(CONTINUED FROM TULY 23, 1991) (THIS ITEM IS
CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 24, 1991.)
BLOT MOTION TO CONTINUE.
TO 9/24/91 - i1W
~~~~~~~
2. Ordinance ratifying and confirming the acquisition and
5
H. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
- CONSENT AGENDA
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 11/19/91
URC
1. An Ordinance to rezone 2.9 acres from M-2 to R-E to
bring an existing nonconforming use into conformance
with the zoning ordinance located at 5266 West River
Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of
Roanoke County Planning Commission.
2. An ordinance to rezone 12.387 acres from A-1 and M-2
to A-1 to bring an existing nonconforming use into
conformance with the zoning ordinance, located 0.8 mile
northeasterly from the point of intersection of Berkley
Road, Vinton and Hollins Magisterial District, upon the
petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission.
I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the lease of real estate, a portion
of the Old Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant property, to
the Valley Soccer Club.
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 11/19/91
URC
J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the
addition of Article VIII "Fire and Security Alarms" to
4
SUPERVISOR NICKENS: ASKED FOR REPORT ON
INFORMATION REGARDING ROANOKE COUNTY'S CONTRIBUTIONS
TOWARD TOURISM.
SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: (1) ASKED WHEN AUDIT REPORT
WOULD BE READY. ECH WILL HAVE ON 11/19/91 MEETING AND
WILL SCHEDULE AUDIT COMNIITTEE MEETING FOR THAT DATE.
(2) ASKED THAT REPORT ON TOURISM INCLUDE BOTH
FINANCIAL AND INI~ND CONTRIBU'T'IONS FROM ROANOKE
COUNTY.
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) THE VACO/VML TASK FORCE
WILL MEET AT END OF NOVEMBER (2) RECEIVED PETITION
FROM CITIZENS IN WEST ROANOKE COUN'T'Y. ASKED THAT IT BE
SUBNIITTED TO STAFF FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YFAR'S VDOT
HEARINGS AND THAT LETTER BE SENT TO MR HOWELL. ECH
WILL FOLLOW THROUGH.
N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
O. REPORTS
HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE
UW
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) VACO/VNiL TASK FORCE
COMING TO CONCLUSION AND WILL MEET IN NOVEMBER TO
DISCUSS ARFAS OF CONCERN. (2) ASKED STAFF TO DRAFT
NOISE ORDINANCE. PMM PLANS TO BRING BACK REPORT ON
11/19/91 ON RESULTS OF NOISE ORDINANCE IN ROANOKE CITY.
L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMIVIUNICATIONS
NONE
M. REPORTS
BI;T TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 5
UW
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
6
COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1991
JANIIARY
FEBRIIARY
REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
~rv~~
~ ~~ ~1 ~ ~
i
Three year term of Richard W. Robers will expire 02/10/91.
MARCH
LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COIINCIL
One year term of Frances R. Holsinger will expire 03/31/91.
LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS
One year term of Murry K. White will expire 03/31/91.
APRIL
TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION
Four year terms of Lt. Art LaPrade for the County Police; Fred
C. Altizer, Jr., for the Virginia Department of
Transportation; H. Rodney Smith for the Senior Citizens, and
Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison, will expire 04/01/91.
MAY
JIINE
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Five year term of Eldon L. Karr, Windsor Hills District, will
expire 06/30/91.
CLEAN VALLEY COIINCIL
Two year terms of Vince Reynolds and Richard W. Robers,
Advisory Member, will expire 06/30/91.
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
Three year term of Charles Steve Garrett will expire 06/30/91.
1
PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District; Yvonne
Willis, Catawba District; James Bryant, Hollins District; Paul
D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District; and Roger L. Falls, Vinton
District; will expire 06/30/91.
ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD
SELECTION COMMITTEE
Four year terms of Frank E. Thomas, Catawba District, and
Barbara Chewning, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/91.
VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD
Four year terms of Stephen A. Musselwhite and Jean Glontz will
expire 06/30/91.
JULY
ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
Four year term of John Hubbard, will expire 07/31/91.
AUGUST
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD
One year terms of Bernard Hairston and Edmund J. Kielty,
Alternate, will expire 08/31/91.
GRIEVANCE PANEL
Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 09/27/91.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Four year terms of Charles R. Saul and Bill Triplett will
expire 09/26/91.
OCTOBER
GRIEVANCE PANEL
Two year term of Cecil Hill, Alternate, will expire
10/12/91.
a
NOVEMBER
HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Two year term of Anne Renner will expire 11/26/91.
DECEMBER
ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY
Four year terms of Steven A. McGraw and Richard W. Robers will
expire 12/31/91.
COIIRT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD
Three year terms of Harry C. Nickens and Betty Pullen will
expire 12/31/91.
LIBRARY BOARD
Four year terms of Jane Bryant, Catawba District, and Dr. Paul
M. Zeis, Windsor Hills District, will expire 12/31/91.
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY
COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD
Three year terms of Rita J. Gliniecki, and Dr. Joseph Duetsch,
Member at Large, will expire 12/31/91.
ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION
Four year terms of Ronald L. Massey, Hollins District and
Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring District, will expire 12/31/91.
3
1990 IINFILLED COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Five year term of M. E. Maxey, Chairman, Vinton District,
expired 06/30/90.
BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENTS AND APPEALS
Four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell expired 12/12/90.
ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION
Four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, expired
12/31/90.
APPOINTMENTS/VACANCIES TO BE FILLED FOR 1991
DISTRICT TERM EICPIRES
ROANORE COIINTY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY
Steven A. McGraw Catawba 4 yrs 12/31/91
Richard W. Robers Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Eldon L. Karr Windsor Hills 5 yrs 06/30/91
M. E. Maxey, Chairman Vinton 5 yrs 06/30/90
BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT3 AND APPEALS
Wilmore T. Leffell 4 yrs 12/12/90
CLEAN VALLEY COIINCIL
Vince Reynolds 2 yrs 06/30/91
Richard W. Robers, Advisory 2 yrs 06/30/91
COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS RESOIIRCES BOARD
Bernard Hairston 1 yr 08/13/91
Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate 1 yr 08/13/91
COIIRT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COIINCIL/YOIITH AND FAMILY SERVICES
ADVISORY BOARD (INACTIVE UNTIL FIIRTHER NOTICE)
James K. Sanders Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/91
Gerald Curtiss Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90
Roger Smith Catawba 2 yrs 03/22/90
Gary J. Minter Hollins 2 yrs 03/22/90
Sherry Robison Windsor Hills 2 yrs 03/22/90
Hoyt C. Rath Vinton 2 yrs 01/26/89
James L. Trout Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89
Ted R. Powell Cave Spring 2 yrs 03/22/89
Dr. J. Andrew Archer Vinton 2 yrs 03/22/88
Youth Members Cave Spring 1 yr
William Byrd 1 yr
1
PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Kenneth D. Bowen Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91
Yvonne Willis Catawba 3 yrs 06/30/91
James Bryant Hollins 3 yrs 06/30/91
Paul D. Bailey Windsor Hills 3 yrs 06/30/91
Roger L. Falls Vinton 3 yrs 06/30/91
ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION
Ronald L. Massey Hollins 4 yrs 12/31/91
Donald R. Witt Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31/91
A. Kyle Robinson Vinton 4 yrs 12/31/90
REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
Richard W. Robers 3 yrs 02/10/91
ROANORE COIINTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION
COMMITTEE
Frank E. Thomas Catawba 4 yrs 06/30/91
Barbara Chewning Vinton 4 yrs 06/30/91
ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
John Hubbard 4 yrs 07/31/91
TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION
Lt. Art LaPrade, County Police 4 yrs 04/01/91
Fred C. Altizer, Jr., VDOT, Cave Spring 4 yrs 04/01/91
H. Rodney Smith, Sen.Citizen, Windsor Hills 4 yrs 04/01/91
Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison Vinton 4 yrs 04/01/91
VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMIINITY COLLEGE BOARD
Stephen A. Musselwhite
Jean Glontz
4 yrs 06/30/91
4 yrs 06/30/91
3
Glenvar High 1 yr
Northside High 1 yr
COIIRT-COMMIINITY CORRECTIONS POLICY BOARD
Harry C. Nickens
Betty Pullen
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
Charles Steve Garrett
GRIEVANCE PANEL
Kim Owens
Cecil Hill, Alternate
HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Anne Renner
INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY
Charles R. Saul
Bill Triplett
LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COIINCIL
Frances R. Holsinger
LEAGIIE OF OLDER AMERICANS-BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Murry K. White
3 yrs
3 yrs
3 yrs
2 yrs
3 yrs
2 yrs
4 yrs
4 yrs
1 yr
LIBRARY BOARD
Jane Bryant Catawba 4 yrs
Dr. Paul M. Zeis Windsor Hills 4 yrs
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY
COMMIINITY SERVICES BOARD
Rita J. Gliniecki 3 yrs
Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large 3 yrs
2
12/31/91
12/31/91
06/30/91
09/27/91
10/12/91
11/26/91
09/26/91
09/26/91
03/31/91
03/31/91
12/31/91
12/31/91
12/31/91
12/31/91
R-91091-10
LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AT 6:46 - URC
EVENING SESSION (7:00 P M )
P. WORK SESSION
1. Joint Work Session with Board of Zoning Appeals
ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT IN 60 DAYS (11/19/91) ON WAYS TO
ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
CONSENSUS TO SET ANOTHER WORK SESSION IN SIX MONTHS
(MARCH 1992)
2. Privatization
NO CONSENSUS TO GO FORWARD AT THIS TIME
Q. ADJOURNMENT
HCN MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 935 P.M.
UW
9
Chapter 16, "Police" to regulate the use and operation of
security and fire alarm systems. (COr~TINLTED TO
NOVEMBER 19, 1991)
CONTIlVUED TO 11/19/91
K. APPOINTMENTS
1. Court Community Corrections Policy Board
2. Grievance Panel.
~ ~ ~ ~ °1 3. Health Department Board of Directors
LBE SUGGESTED THAT THIS APPOINTMENT BE DROPPED UNTIL
THE BOARD BECOMES ACTIVE.
4. Library Board
ECH ASKED THAT APPOIIVTMENTS TO THIS BOARD BE DEFERRED
5. Planning Commission
6. Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
L. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION Ilv THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS
DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
5
I~~~ c.~~.~-E bt.
~ . "l ' ~ ~ ~ '~~ ~~ r
,~~~
'` ~'~'`~ ~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY
~`.~' ;» ~' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
.i
MEMO T0: Elmer G. Hodge, County Administrator
FROM: Stephen H. Carpen Parks and Recreation
DATE: September 3, 1991
SUBJECT: Equestrian Committee Request
At their regularly scheduled meeting held today, the Roanoke County
Equestrian Committee requested permission to appear before the
Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, September 24,
1991. The purpose of the request is to formally present a framed
photograph of the Green Hill Park Equestrian Center to Joe Thomas,
Sr. in appreciation for his donated work which helped the
Equestrian Center a reality. Possible a Resolution of Appreciation
from the Board of Supervisors would also be in order.
The Equestrian Committee would also like to bring the Board up to
date regarding the success of the Equestrian Center and their
planned activities,
Please let me know if I can make arrangements for the Equestrian
Committee and Mr. Joe Thomas to attend the September 24, 1991,
Board meeting. Thank you.
SC/bb
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors Members
FROM: Joseph B. Obenshain ~ /
Senior Assistant County Att r y
DATE: October 4, 1991 '
SUBJECT: Open Burning Ordinance - Proposed
SAPCB approval
I am providing for your advance review the proposed "Open
Burning" ordinance which will soon be presented to the Board for
official action. State law, § 10.1-1321 requires that the State Air
Pollution Control Board [SAPCB) must approve any local ordinance
relating to air pollution before it becomes legally effective. My
intention is to submit this proposed ordinance to the SAPCB within
the next ten days in the final form which we hope it to have upon
passage.
This proposed ordinance adopts by reference the state's
regulations on open burning and establishes a permit system to
enforce and regulate this process. No permit would be required for
practices, such as agricultural or forest management practices,
which are currently permitted by the SAPCB regulations without
permits in the rural areas of the county.
The SAPCB regional office has estimated that the approval
process may take as long as six to eight weeks. In order to avoid
a major delay necessitated by having to resubmit our ordinance
should changes be made at 1st or 2nd reading, I would appreciate
receiving any comments you might have within the next ten days.
/jbo
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE I, OPEN BURNING, TO
PROVIDE FOR A PERMIT SYSTEM FOR THE REGULATION
OF OPEN BURNING AND TO PERMIT THE OPEN BURNING
OF LEAVES FROM TREES
WHEREAS, at present the Virginia Department of Air
Pollution Control, the Virginia Division of Forestry .and the
Roanoke County Fire Marshal's Office all have overlapping and
potentially conflicting jurisdiction over open burning occurring
within the County of Roanoke; and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the Department of Air
Pollution Control provide that local ordinances concerning leaf
burning shall supersede the Department's regulations and that local
ordinances which are as least as restrictive as the Department's
regulations shall likewise supersede the Department's regulations
on that subject; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Air Pollution Control has
indicated that it lacks the manpower and other resources to enforce
its regulations controlling open burning within the County of
Roanoke, and citizens of the County have indicated frustration and
confusion in attempting to deal with the overlapping agencies and
conflicting regulations governing open burning within the county;
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took .place
on and the second reading and public hearing of
this ordinance took place on
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a new Article I, "Roanoke County Open Burning
Regulations" of Chapter 3, "Air Pollution" of the Roanoke County
Code is adopted and enacted as follows:
ARTICLE I. ROANOKE COUNTY OPEN BURNING REGULATIONS
Sec. 3-i. Permitted open burning of leaves from trees.
a. In those areas of the county r~:`<`~~ ~..;•..
vi:}iiii•%?.:{v..>UJ4:+%Ai:?ii~riJC•:??i::: •::::.ii'riiiii::hi: iiiiii'{i4Nn'i~GG'r, •• •••••
:L?+;?:':'.~''i ~ i:;:'~":;ii;;: i::i::: ~? • {i::i: :%::::: •.~:yj. •:i.":i?iF ~••' ~''~' i::ii::t`::iii:Jiiii::' ;?:i::i:::; ':nii::i?:: :..i:?^:^{?:?CL{i4iY.: •.u:•iv:?.}:.i}i}ii:' }iiiiiii:.}}}:w: • v.: :
......+ ......................:: :w:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:::: ::w:::.::::::::•:w::r ?ry:::::4:L??:.:•i:::: is i:.~:::: Oii:4ii .:C ~:Oii::4: i:4iiiii:4i:'!i0
fif3~~e ~~ , ,~ ,..~ Q...,~'i fse~rs~•s =tee e
~g o ~ez-e fete
e€-Bret--les•e ~a~r--per-e9--~~~ the open burning of leaves from
trees shall be permitted after the hour of 4:00 p.m. and before
sunset o~~:~e;~ys--between September 15 and December 1 and between
March 1 and May 15, subject to the requirements of subsection c.
b. In all other areas of the county except those covered by
subsection a, the open burning of leaves from trees is permitted
after the hours of 4:00 p.m. and before sunset from
March 1 through May 15 or at any time of the weep day during the
rest of the year, subject to the requirements of subsection c.
c. The following conditions shall apply to all open burning
permitted by this section, as follows:
1. The burning shall take place only upon the residential.
lot or adjoining property owned by the individual who conducts
....
M
t.
such burnin ~""'" '~"'~' ~ ~ • ~~
.;. •, ~.
g. :::::~~ • ...::~ .: :~ :.. • • t. ... .:.. .
::::' Abil.{?::ilrYh'ris. rii..J•. `:VR4'/ .,r .. .................:.... : ... .. • ~ y} ~„•.,•~.
•~' nwtiir?nRy.,.:ndfl.Gi r'w,+>sx~a~.•'.\~'>•,'VAV! :: +:'•~~•
.;.
~{ •^~^.v; .{.x. v{.,yi~,N,~I,.!:iC.:/{{?.,:{:..;, }v,{r{..•x.•r: r{ryn;.w,,,v,... . {~+
r .:
:' •" ~ ~: ;r.::.,~~yy~:~:~{ ~~F?, fay
+{'•r:.. .,. `;:, rivy'? ~{Cr: M1iiu{rr;v.:ryy,:
~....v......JAt...:....~, fY/F..?:;::•FI.Mi;.+l..?ti~:~M•IM:iM. .
.. 7
:•:::::%•}]OOC 4i•::::??i?ri..::???+iiir%fF//N:r:CCtt:;{;'rtivti:•:i+iif ~?iiii:~iiii:}:::iii:::::•i: ii: ~: ri •::::'•i::•S?i:•::: i:: ~: ~::' .: :................... ... ~ry~.G;ki::•M~I/%:j~i~iiiF:. ..•
.............................::: f.:~i.•%•:::vvv::::L.:.•;.:::!{.;{::::•:{?::::: n:.: of ffffli ii\~J:<ti:::jjC:;'y`: i:::•::•iY•i:~?~Yi •~.4
.; .... M1,~ ~ ~ ...........
2. The location of any burning shall be not less than 300
feet from any occupied building unless the occupant(s) have
given their prior permission in writing, but in no case may
such burning be closer than 50 feet to any structure.
3. The fire or burning shall be attended at all times, and
until completely extinguished, by a competent adult who is
physically capable of taking reasonable efforts to control
such burning.
d. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as
authorizing any other open burning except as shall be lawfully
permitted by county ordinance or regulation or state law or
regulation.
e. The Office of the Fire Marshal of the County of Roanoke
shall have the power to enforce this section Violation of this
section shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor and be punished in
accordance with Sec 1-10. If any fire shall originate from the open
burning of leaves by any person, such person shall, in addition to
any fine, be liable to the county for the full amount of all
expenses incurred by the county in suppressing such fire. Such
amount shall be recoverable in a civil action brought on behalf of
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
sec 3-2. open Burning Regulations.
a. impose. It is the u ~~~~~ ~"'~"` ""~~ ~~~ --~ -
p rpose of this ~~ =m~~-to
......:::.:::v:.....
establish a permit program for certain types of open burning within
the county under standards that are consistent with and no less
stringent than the requirements of the Department of Air Pollution
Control and the Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
b. State regulations adopted. The regulations of the
Department of Air Pollution Control, effective January 1, 1988 or
their successor, governing "OPEN BURNING" (RULE 4-40), and in
particular § 120-04-4001 through § 120-04-4005, and the provisions
of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code, 8th edition, adopted April
15, 1991, governing open burning, and in particular Section F-301.0
"OPEN BURNING", are hereby adopted by reference and made a part
hereof to the same extent as if set out at length herein. For the
purpose of this ordinance, the terms "the board", "the executive
director", and "the regional director" as they appear in the
aforesaid regulations or Code shall mean the Fire Marshal of
Roanoke County, his assistants or designees.
c. Permit svstem. Other than as lawfully permitted by Sec
3-1, it shall be unlawful for any person within the boundaries of
the County of Roanoke to undertake or permit any open burning
otherwise permitted by state regulations under subsection b without
obtaining a valid permit in accordance with this subsection.
1. The Fire Marshal or his assistants <r>,;. ;.;:~ are
......................:::.~Y,:.~«
authorized to issue permits for open burning after being
contacted by the owner of the property upon which such burning
shall take place, or his/her authorized agent, and physically
examining the location to insure compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations and that such burning will not
present an undue danger to life or property.
i^`i: :~i::`•:. nib:::: }Yxxrr{.}}v.;rmn}:x?? } .y~ YMhy^i:•:.v?Hr: ••.:7M .JM:^};yY r• .M ., YfN~?H^!?{!!: ? :4,M:f.???Y.^:?•:..,•.;.•.k,....}....:n~
• ;.:: .
• .' ,;;..
.::::::: ~..:..~::::::•:o•.:?•:.:::::;?.:c:~.:.::.::aY~w:>:w::ti:::;;.::::%:r.::::wneu?.»s::?,::.:?w.Y::x::;:G:;.is:.~...;.~.;~.,:::.:;.v~:::daia~
':'~} v.::;'•,';:;::'::0:.%.xi:Syr:~~.~r~.••~~:;{.:i'i::LCiy~:~i::i:;isi{ii'}:•:i::isyi:::::;{%~':~~::~~}:?'...iisi:{•}::'rG::tii~sfinYi:'}.....:'.;{i:';':::in•:.;. •4;{n?.{t.{.yr:::~ f•?•~~i'i': i.. r. ~j ~/~ I~ .(
^'•:{iiy
t .
'~ ~....~ ~ ......... afiiM~... ~4~~~w.#•~~~rlf~ ~~ ~h~ f~~~~j:~~„{1i,•~i~i::~~,~,11~:i~::~i.~v:,:I,.'.i ~. .: :: .:.
......... ......... ..........................:::::::::nw::.::v:::::::; .•:::viii:iii}isiv:...............::::::::::::::. :..;• ...
.......................
v.v ......................•..nv%~/~
-:: i:'.i:G:?i• • v; . ;. v.:v v w:::.::::::: • w: v.:w:: v: x:::.}.i: {::v.:: v: u:::......::.v.v:.y:.{: y:::.
... v ... ., .:i.....~.. +..:...::. ,::::::i:::: .. ...i ...:::::. ~~J:{~..,•R.,{yv{h:(v.~.r.~. r .:.._.: ~ii::i: :i~1"j:~i:..i.~}.i.~j.: '.7y~,'.,'~:.~:A.: ii~;l'•:~:ry{•:,•:::;i:}•: •iii/:i1:~::i:::::iffl,' :.
Fih~~~ ~~~~ ~h .~ ~Nt•MRI-Ki~Y~t~:r:::S/•:n'r,:~,4.,~M,~:M~F~W .F ~I :::,:~~..... ..
.n., in..n ...
.. n..... ......... ........: iii::4}::4iiii: , .
........::.•r::::::~.::.w::m :.: m:::: ...:..}... .....xu: iii>ii}W:Y iy '
'r;•{:n•.{i :: :..:.:...:.: ::•w;:.v::•::nv:::.x.:ix:::,.w:•ivi's,..4yvm:: xn:v:+.yw;:: •i: ~in: is
}~.'1.ix.;.:iy,•isti:..i.•..r.r:r:{.}::rxx.i}:vv.:.. i:.}:{: ••{x..
-:::::.
...,,..:>ii:.iiii:.::z:;::::.::.ii:.i:•>::>::>::::>::i~i:>s:~::>: <> i.: rr:: ••: rr:::~ :......:....., , ~~~.:«z::.
::: : .:: .:::..:.......:fa
:.:.,.:.M................,.:....:.......:.., :.::.::::: ..
.:.. ~ '~t•'~a~a' ~~is.~:ao-:: ~:..;.>..:..:, f ::.:;..:: ~ :~ ~ : • :...::i::::... i;:.<,"::,:,«::ii: ':::: f<ii:..i.>;:i• .i.:.i:.:i:;:;;::<.y,.:.;.•,9o:.~oe .. eaegow.
:. .:::::::.:::::::::::::::.i:..
......... ,...,..:.. 3A.~,
... :::....::.:.::... N::,;: w :::
<:;::::: •,: •o: • ••:i•.•.:.:..::.o: ~fm.••::.i.::<iii...rf.?..ii: ..;.i i..:~••»••::i.,;iii.;;ii: iiviii:::iiyyy:.i., iio.
ti .:::::::::. ~.. ~,~,
::.: ~ ?~+ 4 ~X~i •v'~N'.iii.:x •..k..:....ii:;x.,v?r:x,^!K!AYf
:..:::,~::ii,:iiiii:i:.ii:.>iii:.iii:r>i;;<::a~-:::~>:~:::>:::>~:~:>::;.:~:n :.. ••
.. ::::..r.isi::.i..:.~ :................:.............. ....::::....
• ..:..:. .. ....:.:::.......::::Fi.Nr:::::.iii:::ii>ri~,iii:.:::>:::~:.;::.........
....: i..
ir.:C•,v,~M:{n:i:~i:::.:::uror .w.i.. ::.:i^:H.•+..}}•H.+fp}v .%{C,y,:x ;.viv:v..:.v::: r :. N..,H.:n::•.iiGtiiriw•.:iipy, nny:,~
::...,... ........... ~... '~~~::.::.~.N:..~C~
•iFfi}iiiiX4iiiv:i•:iVi::.:ii.:~iiv%~nii}4~iG:•itiim4'i••••••..:.:••••. •: .,'x:. iC ll.<:..,.•• ~• '!•!yR':' •••. ~y~•i: :: ~. •:
••• • . ffrk+i: i•:•:•ii•:i•:ti+f~: i • • •,• : kiFn•)C4lf.4ri~iriiLri4'}i:{tii{::Si'ri7,~:; %i ~•' •'~(~d
"~i( y rL:?Ji;•w.n••{.:.w.;n:;vvx~nv,.;nr lrr,:+~wimrii..v,.:..nrmnvx}yi;..,mwx.,w.: f. .:.. :.
44~' '.::.;'f.?;ky:~ iGi:::: ~ ... :: .:.i'f.'f,.': : ~ .. ~. '...: ~ .:: i::i::..:. ••:1f1fA.:•Y•..•vwrnmrw.}', . i.:r ,.;.nwi.:.vp~ :::' .:
::..........:..:.:.........v........... .................::....,::......:..:.................~..:. •~
................ ....::::::.::::...:.iiv:~ .ii:.i:.iii..........::::::::::::~i~:i:;:Y:::io~:i'.,,
_.
ii,~i:...:i<i..v««..:~:.>ii:.:.::::i•..i:::x.,..~..w.k.:iv,.w.>:. ...
..::......
~r~~~:~>::~::.i :... .::::...i.....,..,.
... .. .
~:
.,..~~~ ., ems :..::::::.::. • . :.:.::.i:<>~<.:.: is
.... :i4}.:.::. f/.p '• iY,:: ti{.;r<i.:.:: r: x:: fN..{{.•v{i.~
2. Open burning operations shall be permitted
consistent with the requirements of subsection (b) upon the
responsible party obtaining a permit from
~::...: •: ~ i i.
.....»~kf•.J.[de:F,t.'f~w•'%/rfacC:aaiH~R}{:i:~~A~l~i;~'~~aIW'~d~k~ :. :• :, a
....w,,:.•AcGff3 rXYY,io." Cfdxkv`:ic:'•.. .'v't~ila'fi'::,.:ccGi„b;ur;;c"
;::..
°.......:.:.• ~ ..:..:...:::..:... and upon payment of
the required fee as specified herein:
(i) for residential burning within the boundary of such
t
residential tax parcel by the owner of any residence -
payment of a fee of $25.00 ;
(ii) for business/commercial burning by the owner of a
business or commercial premises holding a current Roanoke
County Business License decal - payment of a fee of
$50.00 ;
(iii) for construction or other related operation by an
individual or firm holding a valid Roanoke County
building: ~~---demolition ~~'~' ermit for the
...................::.....................::: P
property upon which the burning will be conducted -
payment of a fee of $100.00.
(d) Penalties. The penalty for any violation which would
constitute a violation of state law or regulation shall be as
prescribed by state law. The Office of the Fire Marshal of the
County of Roanoke shall have the power to enforce this section.
Violation of this section shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor
and be punished in accordance with Sec 1-10. If any fire shall
originate from any open burning regulated by this section by any
person, such person shall, in addition to any fine, be liable to
the county for the full amount of all expenses incurred by the
county in suppressing such fire. Such amount shall be recoverable
in a civil action brought on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
2. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after
/jbo •
~ it A ~'F
~, L
~- ~o
z ~
z
a
OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS
526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE
SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153
October 25, 1991
TO: Mrs. Mary Allen
FROM: Ruth Wade
Enclosed are two appropriation resolutions which we would like for
the Board of Supervisors to consider at its November 19 meeting.
Dr. Kolb and Dr. Kyle will attend the meeting.
Enclosures (2)
c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt
M E M O RAN D U M
TO: Elmer Hodge
FROM: Don Myers ~~~
DATE: September 24, 1991
RE: Traffic Light at Intersection of Route 117 and Northside
High School Road
---------------------------------------------------------
I have contacted Fred Altizer of VDOT and Bob Bengston at the
City of Roanoke regarding the subject traffic light and have
determined the following:
o According to Bob Bengston, the light is estimated to cost
an upper limit of $100,000.
o The City is willing to pay its share.
o Fred Altizer has indicated that VDOT would contribute
one-fourth toward the cost of the light.
o Bayse Wilson has agreed to pay for one-half the County
share. I am presently working to identify the source of
funds for the remaining portion.
o At this point, there is no firm commitment from Kroger
to participate in the funding of the light. We should
probably contact Mr. Sieveking at Kroger directly to
determine their position.
~\
r ~ .,,I ~
ROANp~
DeC F AII~AMERICA CIT
~~ ~ ~ Yt.~~~e ~~IlI~
~~~~
v "'_ ''a ~ 1979
150 p 1989
18 YEARS $° OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
SFSQUICENTENN~P`'
A Beauti~ul Beginning
PAUL M. MAHONEY November 5, 1991 I(~SFPH B. OBENSHAIN
COUNTY ATTORNEY - -~`
Seth P. Oginz, President `'
>t
. ~ ~ ;'
SECURITY CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED -
P. O. Box 4693
Roanoke, VA 24015
Re: False Alarm Ordinance G
Roanoke County
~~
Dear Seth:
I am enclosing for your review the latest draft of the proposed "false alarm
ordinance" for Roanoke County. It is still the intention of the county administration to
present this ordinance to the Board of Supervisors at their November 19 meeting for final
adoption. If you have any further comments or suggestions, I would appreciate receiving
them by next Tuesday, November 12, so that any necessary changes can be made before
the agenda is distributed to the Board by the end of that week.
I believe that you will find that this draft reflects all of the matters which were
discussed in our meeting with you on October 16, 1991, with one exception. After
considerable discussion among the county officials involved, it is our recommendation not
to include a representative of your industry upon the review panel provided for in Section
16-27 for a number of reasons. First is a philosophical concern about permitting a private
individual to make decisions about matters which directly involve public safety. Secondly,
there are logistical concerns about difficulties is scheduling such hearing with outside
members and the problems when conflicts of interest develop between the appealing party
and the industry panel member.
We are hopeful that the other changes which have been made to this proposed
ordinance are acceptable to you and that you will be willing to support its adoption on
those matters. However, we would certainly understand any views which you might wish
to press upon the Board of Supervisors concerning the composition of the appeals panel.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2007
Page Two
5 November 1991
Let me again extend to you the appreciation of the county administration for you
time and energy in working with us in developing a false alarm ordinance which will be
of significant benefit to both the citizens of Roanoke County and their public servants
within county govemment.
ty yours,
B. benshain, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney
Enclosure
cc: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman
Elmer C. Hodge
Chief John H. Cease
Chief Tommy C. Fuqua
Jack L. Beville, Jr., Acting Fire Marshal
Youth
HAV
~~~
Helping girls find their way home.
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Steven A. McGraw, Chairman Board of Supervisors
~~;~~~Y 1
FROM: Beverly T. Waldo, Director, Youth Haven II~
DATE: September 23, 1991
RE: Youth Haven II Program Evaluation
w'~t ~
It is with pleasure that I forward to you our Youth Haven II
Program Evaluation Report for the first 3 years of operation.
In this you will see that we have exceeded our program goals.
Many people have worked very hard to accomplish these very fine
results and we are all very proud of a job well done.
We hope that you will find this Report informative. If you have
any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel
free to call me at 563-4475.
BTW/krf
Enclosure
cc: John Chambliss
5929 Cove Road, N.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
(703) 563-4475
O~p OAry~kf
~, .I~ ~A
2
Jj d
1818
LVY/C C%vE.4N5 ~
EX/T . ~'~ ~
\
~ t .- _- 'l~4` 1
f I ~
GLEN VAR
MEK,HT$ ~ ~ •~a}~ ~ ~ ~
(
r ~~~ ~~
~
1 ~ ~ ~ fCRF]SN~
~ ...
1
VICINITY MAP
vJ //
/~ . l
~.t_
V
1VORTB
__ .. ..
__ z
_ .___...._.~.._
___.__. __ _
~
~
~ __
OF -__~_
PROPERTY
PORN ~ ~ ROGER E. RARDIN
C~~ ~ 1 1
o TAX N0. 65.00-02-53
~
~~
. W p,TER R N n-
a D.B. 1069, PG. 809
40
SE
W `
wE ~
(
N~TAR ~ ~
~ T1E OC;`
'
j
SA
MEN ~r - ~ S 32'30
E ASE o _ ~ ~
ct N~ N
~ } •
J 38.1
PROPERTY OF
~ ~
~ ~ ~ `D
o N .
VARIABLE WIDTH
' ~
0O `" ~ TEMPORARY CONST~
CAROLYN C. JAY
~ ~
~ EASEMENT -~
~, TAX N0. 64.02-01-57
~ ~~
'
I W.B. 44, PG. 911
~ ~
~ 64.54
SEE NOTES 3 & 4
----------
--- ~p pIN ~~.,_.
~S g253':
- ~~ss
~
S 87'23' 40" W 213.
324.55' uj,
_
PROPOSED MANHOLE #120
pI ~
~ o PROPOSE.
)3'24" W -
N 10'26 54 W
'
~ ~ z ~. p
~ ~ J
~ rn°, F
,
TOTAL
66.87 ' p
~ °' N H OM E
'c
~
~ , os
-
3
TAX t
o W f~ ~ m
D.BI
PROPERTY OF °. a°, a;
i
CANAAN LAND COMPANY ~ ~
TAX N0. 64.02-01- 21 ~
D.B. 1326, FG. 900
SEE NOT_ b ,
' _-- - RnA";EKE RIB
-~
OF WATER-
GEOR~
30' PRESCRIPTi~E--~~ ~ !~ ~~ T~`~
_ l
ACQUISITION OF TWO PROPERTIES FROM CANAAN LAND
BNGINBBRING COMPANY
~ ROANp~
O F
Z A
~ ~ / ALldMfgICA CITY
~~
18 E50 $8 1979
1989
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
Aeeauti/uleeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STEVEN A. MCGRAW, CHAIRMAN
GTAWElA MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
ELMER C. HODGE VINTON MAGLSTERW. DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERUL DISTRICT
October 2 2 , 19 91 HowNS MAGOisTERiAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS
GVE SPRING MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT
Mr. Ted Edlich, Executive Director
Total Action Against Poverty
P. O. Box 2868
Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868
Dear Ted:
I received your letter requesting an emergency allocation of
$10,000 for the Transitional Living Center. As we discussed on the
phone last week, it is my understanding that this would be in
addition to the $15,000 that is already in this year's County
budget for that facility.
I plan to take the request to the Board of Supervisors at
their November 19 meeting. By that time, we will have the results
of the 1990-91 fiscal year audit. I will recommend to the Board
that your request be approved. In the past the Board has been very
supportive of TAP and TLC in particular, and I expect that they
will be so this time.
I am sorry that I cannot take this to the Board sooner, but
there is only one Board meeting in November, so the 19th will be
the earliest that it can be considered.
Please let me know if I may be of further assistance.
Very truly yo~r)s,
n ~/ ~~c/
~wui
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ECH/meh
cc - Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Ms. Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Department
Ms. Reta R. Busher, Director, Management and Budget Department
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2004
a W
We, the Cit~
light at the ,
our opinion
Because of
situation. ' ~~~~~I
not solve the pronrem.
,,
),:_
1 9
petition t:he City of Roanoke to install a traffic
Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
onger die 3rd on a waiting list:, waiting for funds.
Peters Creek Road, this has become ~~ hazardous
~n duty at certain tunes is apl~r~~~ci<rt:ed, but does
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Adrninistration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and yarnes on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and sc:t7ools' fields. Northside High
School audii:orium is rented to civic, groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a Irriority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter 1:his tame. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME _ ADDREc~ -----_ tea- PIIOfJE N0. _
~-
10.3 ~ ~ti , ~ ; ~,
:~-: ; ~ ~ ~ .~
----
~.
•T
- "~'
-- -
~~,, ~~ f-' }C_ - ___,~:il~~ ~c1Llr<,c ~~~~ _/v~,~1,' , ~~~~7u~1^1s-°f_(,<i.<<x~~l~?1 ~~_ -`~~~~;:) -_~~~ ~
~~
_, ,
_ _ _ - 1~ ~ ` - ,1/~~-~ ant ~_.~~ ~ -!~ ~~
/ ~-Q~~1(.,Q ( DO `i ~ ~ ~.:r/:~..~' (_.C.. ~)~~v~r; _. - .V ~ ~ %~D/~ ,: ~~~1v=7~ DO
---
- ~ _ -
..r ~~; .555'</~~~ ~,/~~ ~,~ ~ - S S
-- -;
• ~ - _- "
_ -.
~~C~eu G~^ - _ 36 a.- 40 ~ ~
~, ~ ~~-~Q Val` ~.~1 ~ I ~ --
~ a~r~~ ~ ~ a ~~~
-- .
- ---
_l
-- --- - -
- ,' -
~ ~ ~._~~~~~~~ .~~ ` \ ~ ~Q ~ ~ _ ~ _~'C _.~~'?!~ _...ss._L? L~. -'~ ` -=-~_- 'mil ~ j , - L>~_
-- t
`~~ _ (1/` a.`~,~?~k- ----- Co ~-_11.__ -~~-,q>?.,M yea ~ P_ ~o ~. ~~,k o- c~_'f ° _~1. ~ (p ~ -~ `~~ <
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Ualley, petit.ion i:hc~ City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road ar-d Northside Hiyh Sr.hool Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
[3ecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at: certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersect-ion serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' /ldministration office and Roanoke
County Safety [3uilding, as well as student,, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road.
Also using Northside ffigh School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
N E DDRESS _ __-__ PfIONE NU.
-._ -
•
r r * a~cl _ 7 o b C o ~ e__ ~_ '~ I_~__ ~' `f o l ~----------- - ---5 _!~_? • ~ r ~S =
~- r- :cam ~Qr~x~ a h I °I a ~ne'l~ ~9 • Cc~~~~- ~b _--3° ~-~a.3 ~
- _
. -
~ ~ -
-- l~ ~ i/
__-__
T
--~---- -
_ i 7 ~7
c~-ee/ _~-~ ~~l Z_ j1J_-c1z_~_~~y.<:z - -- I~ r _lU~J C c~~r,,a_/~? (/~_2_~~ t<
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has herrnne a hazardous
situation. having a crossing guard on duty at: certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exiE pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1f00. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Hiyh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and Barnes on
the Roanoke County Parks 8. Recreation fields and schools' fields. Nor•tttside Iliyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS P(iONE N0.
--- --
32t _ ~~~=~~-tom
----------------------------
..__ _
~S Ste- ~e asoQ('h_,a..e-~_c~ • ~6s --~ SFS ~ -
~-- ' 11
---
_ ~~ ~~ tti~~--~---- ---~~--~
---- ~zZ ---`~- __ ~ _35~- --
--
~-
-- - _`~~~n X33 B _~ 5~~.------------ 5~.3- ~ ~ ~
~ `~a _
~~~~~ ~~ ~ L~, _ ~~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, wailing for funds.
E3ecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety (;uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road.
Also using Northside 11igh School Road are families going to practice and games orr
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Iliyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
ADI)RFSS
I'IlONF N(l.
_ ...~cY~/~ ~U O
`7
36~ -F~3 ~ 1
j ~3~ sivJ
~F5- r~Zo
-------~z-~~io _
~ . /A I/'N3.Yr.In,~l rn, ~ ~ n `Y !UI ~v,Q_ ~--Ca r~ - - -~_~ ~_=..
7`f ~.. ('rrcc
,~,
y 3a_2 - -i_ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ v.i.c~ w -~~
--- 3~' ~_~1~~--
3 ~, ~-s3/' ?J~
..
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, wait;ing for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve t(~e problem.
besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iligh Sc(rool Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Higlr
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a (rriority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
N ME ADDRESS _ __ ('IIONE N0.
_ ~S"~ ~ __ SG ~ -a a 3
~ o.a ~ ~ I c3.4 ~~~e.~.-C-.~~,__~ ~ _ ~~.~~5~~
t3. ?ov9 i ' ---~5~3 -~5-~31
~~ c~ T, - ~. R n _ ~ !~_3~ a 3-_~-.
_
l~lfo S 7 ~ ~ 3 co~(.a-~. ~ t~ ~- _ _~ ~~ - ..~ ~- Z ~..
~.. o (~-~-~.s --7 ~ ~ 3 C~d-~. ~~ ~- ------- ---~~v a-34 ~ a-
Zc~3 --~ •-- -- - -~° 1-QZ~-7_~
~1~ ~L1- l DI1._G~ Lb~-~'------------
~ ~8 ~S yC.~. Y?t.cJ _ --- -------------
S G 3- 1 p 7a
_
_
~ ~~
~9 ~ q .-~ d~ ~ ~ Sa.1 ~.,.L, -38 ~ ~ a `7
,6 ~rii - _ ~r~_t~__ _5~~=/s~~ .-
. _ ~
S ~"' ~ Co ~~~Gl/ -- -- - SCOrT~~
~i a ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ --- V `L'
--------
-- ---mow`-"5 l'-°'L_.~ ~ `~~
/
/
__ ~~-~,d~d~~~L._ a ~i~t,~ V ~t -- --~-~a-~L ~ I ~~ -
_ _
~.~ . ~-f 6 3 O Cj ~y?~fc,~,~~ o t_.1G'Y{ ~-J i ~ ~iai-f9'Q~'i., V ~. __ _ G
_ ~~_-..~ ~P Cy O --
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME _ _ ADDRESS __ PHONE N0.
_ ~/~.,.~, -l,~lr,~ k'/off c:~.lo% 07 .7~G 70~ 7
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside liigh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS _ PHONE N0.
~ -~
~2, _ -- ~34a _~~,~.~ ~ ;~ 111. ~~~,~,~ ~~~G..1- ~~'~3
---
\ ~ --7 r
l
~ ' - ~ 2 -- - - ~~'(tz~~-~ >,~~
d-1G~!/` SC(YP 1 ]N JCB/O~Y ~/~trcij-y ~i~~?~J~~1~~---~:~°i~ I~S1~"l)
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. tt is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3r•d on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
4 Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain tunes is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a clay care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and dames on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated. _~
NAME
ADDRESS
P110NE N0.
---
J__~_.~' 2(o Z
36 ~__~~a b __
~(~ 3 -~C~C~~
• ~~~/S~
- ._.~ t~S-_-~73 ~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iligh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain tunes is apprer.iat:ecl, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety E3uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and c~anu~s on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Hiyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a irriority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS ________-__---------_--_-- PIIONE N0.__-_.
` ~ - - ~L 2 -- c ~/v ~'
~ Lt ~ -0 ~--~s- ~~ 7 ~-- ~---- ~ --------- -- - - ------------
_~,~~~
,. .--
~= 31.E _
~; ~-~~~
~G6~ ~60~
---3 ~~ ~~
S~_~c~~2 y ~-~
3b~G-e~zi~~
!. ~/ K.d~si c7VJ{'/1~¢..~ X01 2.6 ~A'K. /~_ c~ - -_~~Z~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition 1.he City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside 11igh School Road. It is
our opinion that t:his issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at: certain tunes is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside high School Road.
Also using Northside Fliyh School Road are families going to practice and dames on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic yroups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this i;ime. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PRONE N0.
3 d3 l~ ~e~~.~-l--r s62 -i~.3~
» ~ ~-. Swri,~~ ~ 9~G ~-s~/~.e.eS~~e~ ~r ~~~s /)'1~~~~T ~~rPl~~Co)
Q=cU~~C ~ ~!7 U ~ s~ ~'Urse~ri~~ lac -___ ~_~,.__~/~ _~ YO! 9 __ 3 6 G - Y s S7
~ - -
e~~ --L3 33 ~!~~~ ~Gc,~--.'P~!ri)/~--L(/~-_____a~l `~ 5~3-S14r
_ _ ~ ~--Icy ~~--~__ _ ,~ --- ----U~ ~?~c~~ ~----_7_~_~~~a
~ ~_ ~ __~~ .__l~~U~_ Z'~~-~------------366 --,s7,~~
--
---- - _ _ _- ___ _ - ___ _ -------~~~. - --- __ . . /~~ __ _ _ ~ ._ ~ _ D/~ __ _ __ ~.7~~-.D ~7~~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside high School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
+ because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Haviny a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
' County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
' and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tune. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PIIONE N0.
.~~~~' ---~,~~_~~~1~Uk-ter ~~; _?l~ ~ ~1l ~l _~_ - j`~` ~ r `1_ ~~~
11-11inn~ S Q-I 2. BBB[ 1511- la . OUdYLGtGt, ~_2y~ 2l __ -----2~7~~y~-
~i
.. ~ .. .:'vr,v- ., .'7 - .~;~~. ~-5..~-u .,lr~{~f~p~±~~w^, .crR~(r,}~9!'~717'~•Tn ce~1 ~~~~t `c~r~T~•rL.At1`7 ^".',If ~1')Y?:. ~'~i.~; tiT,, 1. .!'~, ~i ~~ t~~r'.!
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
]fight at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3r°d on a waiting list, waiting for funds. -
~ Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous ~ ~
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road.
Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to pr•actic;e and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Niyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not consicierecf a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated. i
NAME ADDRESS
f I l(JNE N0.
~ ~ a~,
.,, ~ ~ ~~-~
-- - -
-- _
_.
11
.
_ • r,
_,
---
/~-~) X21+ ~ ~~~- -`' 6 .z . ~~ 3 /3
---- ~~
... ., ~~•.:v v.*u~~. ~.~..: .. -~. ice., •r•.,. , ..;y~•r+:'-a,^m~-:r~1~-n~orewr. .¢^.v~ ztr-r71^•^:7~~,jr ~.v: T,*„1.r1 •n rt,n^.-1.-^tr!!7^.'.I~r .~..Th:..~ ~ r• t~fr,~ -Y ~ ~ i r~ ..~4Rt~^.4 `, ..
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous ~
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600, There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iligh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going t.o practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Iliyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
~I AME _ ADDRESS _______ _______ PIIONE NO____
_. ~-- ~ -
~~ ~~ .
~-----
._ ,
-4:~~ ') /7 ~ ' _ // y-/~.~~iLLLYZ~:ILU~ ~ ~~' ,,~!s~--- --s,.3r~ll =1~t-~?_~ -
.•
f ~ ~-
- - ___ - -
-- -~--
i
' ~ „q~fr1,V ., ,d .'' ,'dr'y:. ,~•'fY~ t''~v4!2RR!",!t;, ;i?"4;Rr~~~Y.Y.&^L"!A'rlvy^~,ft;n•,k ,rs,~, Y •Tr•;,;: li;•. , i ~~rlr K.- ~ 'SiIS(t, !. .r...
i P 'F4L'$, . 1•i 1 '', '"i: ' is a. 't
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
' County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practir,e and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a I~riority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
_-- NAME_ ____ A[)DRESS ___-- _ f'110fJE NO _ _ --
. n ~ ( _~
~~QC~~. ~_l~rr_.2~~ ~ ~ CCl.il-x`l~~f~ ~CL~r-{mil ~f~E:~ ~~~ . -- ----- ~-~'~.=~~:j~J
~ ~ ~-- ~ ~
_ 5~ ~ ~ -
~~~ n
~_S~_~IL7L ~._.. ~ ~~ Y~'17~j f 1~~ ~/1i2,{,Jlr ~~ir"- _ ,~,7 _(~ ~.~_~._.-
~ ~r ---- ~>oG~,~
~__ _ _ ~ .
~~ ~
i c ~ ~,
---__ ~~-
•, -
~ ,a _ • __ /Q 3 Noll ~ A_v_c~~ ,ti : (ZV ~N a k-e +U~ _ _ ___ ~5 `-~ Z - S~ U
. ~ .~--R- (_.i ` `~ 1?-~4_. ~ __ 7 / ~ ~~. C~La- ~- d? ~ . ~~~Co...l, ~ V"%1--- _ _ _ 3_ Y `~ __ (r SO l
'Q1t .0 Aa•• ,L i rJ {~-('I g~ .9.1 ~~~/~ [ 1Ef 1\ 1JaE~ / ~! ~a ~_P rr, l~~- ---- ----- -~~_'1 ~~
'~~ ~Y-~~.-1'.+-~o.N- ~-~r~ ~.iX.~... Val Zs1t~ 1<? ~'/ "7 ~' I Z<~
~a-_V~ ,, - - -------.a~~~~
•,
T„ a.- c ~ , i r,~
1' ' ----1 -----
.,
,,
!t'RYf,a.~ ~ ~' -+""' ',!;~. „F t!(.", .,~''~IE°S~'~, .g7"y• 1:5 ~) 7. j n ~~~,,,.~~ 1. '? .1+. - • :' r~ .r, .r.. +. ,; T 1..
{S•".^' .r .; }~- ~ n .'.~%r `iP ;7i'S@'TK•5t~. .~,.?y,;• i'f• R; .'~'. ,..,?eA +'. , t' (f'
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside fiiglr School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
a fiecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Nor~t~rside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
_ NAME ADDRESS __ PHO~JE N0. __
~~~ _..
~~~tia~_ F~ 11 ~v y~-r--- -~_-~~~ ~~~- -- ~~~. > ~_i;~~-_-
~)Q, .: G,,,,.n-~~ Jul ~ ~'~~,~a.~.o ~~.~ . `~n~,v~,r~~o Vii `>Cr~~~1 ~~~~~~
~/ IG.. M-s~~~~s~~-t,~~-~% ~tlp4' U Gy', ~cv~o,f../~/_ ,.~a~C,2~~m.i ~''~c'J --.~~r,~ ~, . 2-~ ~,
g y _q - -
f6~~~.- y > -L/-----
f~Y{~~L>~v~,.~~ ','~Z~~'~~t~! _S':3~Y ~Lir~r~~r~~L CAL.'' ,/l'~Lc~ ~l'~ ~I~ ~- ---- - ~' ~~ '~ °
~-~ ~ -+- ;
~~Q~ r o_ 6 a 1 fL? '7'x'7 /)~? ~~~ ,n !./ ~~, _ _ ' \>, ~~-7 ,._ _ ~ ~.. ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ C~~~ . +,,
,~~'9-1831
___~~- ,~-_a~.~3
~~~._ll~..l
•
e' _ _
~1~}!-'(>~f'1~ - ,u~ti, ~?c.~L~ ~ ~=c~/SCjr' ,=}i rL'F f~~F ~~/~ - _-~~,._~^ ~.~~ :~~
We, the Citizer.~ of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iliyh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but: does
not solve the problem.
[iesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety building, as well as students, parents and staff of a clay care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1f00. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families goiny to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS I'IIONE N0.
--- --
---~-' ~r<h ~ 1 ~'~ ~ .t'~ t~ r o~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,t l 1 ~r~ , ~ 1~l i; ~ ' ~ ~i, ~ . i _~ (•, S ((.!,:;~< ~ )
-- --~-j / c~-~f ~ -- / 7
Y.~~~`~{, ~/ly.~,. ~~•Cir tt, ~ J //7'~Cct?.G -,- ---~~~_G`__ ~ ~il ~ ~ - -- -' /'~- J (' J-
-- - /- 'r,
_`/~1_~,~Z~ ~ ~ / "'n ~ i \..~ti(1y - J ~ J ~= Y_~) r . 1i> t-~rv . ~'~ ~ 1 ~''~. __ s\%~`~_~`~! i_ ` > ~~ ~;~ __~ ~ ~ I,.,2
-- -~a~,..-~~ii _ `-~ ~ I ~ "7~.e~1'r~.~.~.~ ~e.a~__t~~.~~z!~lZs?,~c_~ ~ ~-{v I'+ ____ ~~L- `-?-~~~ -
~ 7
- - ,, [t - r ~
._._ /
~_~~~~r~~1~r'>^~(~3/ CICr--Sk^'~ /~U~~ /.C'r'lavJ`"c`-~_t f~ ~ /% ~ 7c/ _ :~rJ J-~.~
~)- 1 M -- - - --- -- - __ _ _n ---
(i L..~U,L ~_- a 1 ~`~ ~vrt~~' Crf'. U,~1~~,. l1~? ~ U' ~~' ~ /L~ rK~ ~[./
f ~
_"~_"~`~
~- ~ - ~~~.~ .l'f G_~1~ moo. i3v ' ' ~1 ~ ~r~~~~ ~- ~~~~;>1~'----- _ - `~:' L-r--:~~~~/
/7 7 /, .i j 7n / y/.-, , ..
L..'L~/ -/ f~+ =a ~-~~-- /lJC/1 A/f~~~TiC; ~~7II~. r7..ll_l.~ i ( .r i > i '~- ~ ,~ i /:i~ ~
i ~ 7r - 5 ~ ~_~ ~-.._ s-_.--_. _ _ _..__s.-~ ~_~:.
j
1~- ~~ 3 ,~ - - ,
~'.,.~ ~ .,~~ uL - ~ D ~ LO ~F~~~'.. 4~ ~ J~- ~IUC..V-f~\C~ Y ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~-~~_ ~ `~ Cad I •J l
- -
_~.°~~.n`k.1~u., S50~~t~'Ir..e~?~ R~ ~~-.r`~-.____~~~~_4J~___ 3~~Z.a_~.~3
f ,~ p
._.1 ~ (9'f~'-LPL: ~rl 'ter r d ~~r~1/Ll.l-~C~~.Q~ ~I~~t-~,^ 2 9,) L~.tt'7t.E:JL~ r J ~ j U /~/~ r 11._~ r..r~ ; 7:l
~~~~~~'~ ~(,~/~19.L~1't,~ ~~,j~~~c~'C"/C 71~7~1G r)tc'~-~j~C,+'~`C ~,~~ c ~~t~ r i 'j t' :~ - ...'`j~!i
_ .. ( ._
_~x.~ ~; ~>rz.+ esq. i c.r!'1! ., ~' `~ Z./ (~ App, n~ s~?cx~ ~i- ~ c4-' u-l'~_ ~`r~ ~ I `r ~~ ~ ` ~ -G 3
--->_- > --~ -- --~----~_ __~-~-y 5
~~P.Mr:J r+ i ~ ~ I,r' ~ .~fi Pp. ~,L+'t~!fi M' P .I .r 1j:T Y ,~ .t~~ :T •:.. ,t-.~ `~,r'%• ril' r vl~r K "a'Yi "I'~yTfr j-~~.
... ~ ~ / .. I.~.L'.i ..~ r G~' ~r ~r•- It t. .vl, i .~'t. ~. l~l ~~ .. ~ .k .t '..
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
• light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside high School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waitiny list, waitiny for funds.
~ Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety BLilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks 8. Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creatiny additional traffic.
_ ~i
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAh1E _ ADDRESS __
N ci
-_~'~- "`-`gy`p'- __-~? l --- ~.'~" ` ,''~ c~_~r .=`
.y J / ~ v
/,G~4;,Cj•(,G~ ~~r~J _ ,~1, dU ' ~7IZ ~~CCCG~2G'CG~ 4'~CC
~Q,"G~ ~~!~' ~c,~C/V Z. c_sL . 7nU ~~~ X_~L___ ~' Cc.~ ~ /i J ~ -
C .~
cr_~__t~"__~~t1l.t\~~R- _ ~3~=2~ \~t.~c'~. ~~1tit 't-:~~
,~ -~
~ ~.
/ ~
14 u__
~ , , t ~~ .•r .., a ~~ /]fi.~ r .:1 . (.~., .n, l ~t ~J7 ~~.. ~ r J c! / ~ /~C,
_---- _PIIONE NO__--
_ ~
~/ r'
~ :S ~~' ~~
1, Vr, ~t~ia~ _ -J~~.~ _,~~y~~~,3~~~ ~
T------------- l -- -- -_----
1 --- - - ~~ - ~ )
f /~
v~ ~ ~ _v ~ 3'{3_`r~'u1o
~-
5ys~
// ,. /
--
ax' v ~- ~ ~ ~,~,tq~ ~-r~ ~~ ~~~,~ r -r,}, 'L@ ~`ar. ~;~^~ :Y:rrm M.^. t' ]~"' i r. ;r~i I~. ,i ,+ ;t
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to practice and Barnes on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditor°iurn is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the (natter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAM~_-
L'-- v- ?-.,~,'~
~, ~~~s
~,~~
_~
~h~(~ n~,
_ ADDRESS _ _ PHONE N0.
7
~ i
-~~=- -~-- t-- - -------
;, ~-~-
,~
_ ~3 ~(' ~~ ~,~~ -~~~ ~---- -
I1 ~AKL N ~ 1 t ~ `\ 1C"t \. , r~ Il 1"~ ~1 ^l~ -~E ~ ~, Q ICJn Y(l ': ~fl (~17
i~l ,~c,~r
- ~t
~ boa ~ ~~i~ 9~~_s~,~
~~
v
~1~ V ~ ~ , Yf[_~~/ ~ ~_ ~ / ~ ~~~L.~. ~~Za_.~_. ]L2 ~ __-~ ` LI '_I _._ __._.__ _--..__ ~J~.1~ I t~C_~~`J
Z , - ~ ~D ` ~ ~~. ~ X'~S~- 1~ T ( ~j~~=~ -mil/[>
~~ _ ~" ~ ~~~~c 19l ~ Vic! J'h-~ ~~,-~ s~,~ U ~?~~-i ~=~~---- .~~~ ; ~> ~~
~---
.~~1. ~ ~c I -?QL L~-~ ~.~ ~ S'r- ~ o_s~+~.flY+~~ V a Z_~s] i l b z - ~ 8b5
~ ,
'.' , ' ~' ,~ ~ ~,~cz3~ /Tl ~ Gh Ci.~, .a/~~/7 .~~~~ ~~>'~~~/
a.Cl/~-/1 ct.a/~c/~(3/ G~tJSe. 171.E OCtnGift l _'
-----~---__-- ~----- -._-__1__..~------- --___ ------- ~------ - _ _ - - - - - -- --_-~` __.
We, the Citizers of Qoanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High Sciiooi Road.
Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
7
NAMF ADDRESS PHONE N0.
. ~ i
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic II
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside I1igh School Road. 1t is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, ~~faiting for funds.
{ Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous _ ~
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the probl ern.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tine. An ex{~edient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0.
- -, ~; ,;ti ~; i 3 L
.~ y ~o ~~~.~~<~~~s~ ~ ,
~~ ~ ,2~z=~~,~ ------ ~~~ti_ ~~=:- ~ f ~ = s ~ s--- --
~ -- -a-------------- ----__ -
,,
-- - .
c
,~
- r `J
-_._-~ S ~-1 ~-r•-! c l~c,fi _~ / ~n ~~-GsJS' c-~„t-~~,~ ~y _~ ~~!t~1L~° _ ~ ~l~ ~' -] J ~", c~
_ --- "-
_ ~ - ~ ~ 'r_
--/ - - -1-/ ~- ~ / - ' --- - ---~.
-~?cr~-_~ ~~ _~-~~.•~.~-L-~~- - ~ ~ - --------
- -- ---
- >L/~'i [~ i /-~- a,~ t S/e ,~ ~ /~ 0 ~ ; ~+ '~ 7i e.a ~` ~ ~ S~~> U`.~ ~~ y~ ,; ~; t~~r1 Y 3 ~.
-- _-------1_/
-~-=- -~---~ -=----- ~-~- ------- -_----- t?`~=-~ -- -
_ ~- ,
- --- _
----
---j-- ~"--Y rvM_-L£~tN--------_-_--_. G ~_~Lufi"_f_ r i'~ /~?- -k°!`~!'~`'~ ~ f1< .'i'~!S '~'''~ 1a /C).-
f!~?Ci (fJfC.(~O'~ ZGi JIVt'//aN(~ J1 ~~olnJt"rNG"ZEN WV ZJ ?(''~ r- c~J
G
~ --- -- Y~ - -- ----- y----- --- _._ --- -----
/ -- ---- ----
L '~,
7
_ i
- - " ~ _.
~~ ~ ~ ,
---- - - ~ '
_ 6~' - _. - - --- ~ ~ - - ----- ---- ~ ~' . - -- ---__ --L ._. __ ___ a t A-_ _ _ __
J - - _ - ` _ ,fir, /
~_~ ~ ~_ r /~ J .SC~1 G Lr/iCjc d - / t--'~7/'/=~~-~v ~-..r-`//J,l----~ ^` ~' ~-`-'=='G+
k' y~C~ri(1>~/-~ --- ~ z~'~C) ~ c~ ~~~~i~ ~. lt~Cxr_~_~1 C~~-f~~ /'~/ ~rc~s~_y__ 3~~1~a ti-~~>~lo
titi-yv L^r-t,- ~ ~~ i~?/DC~~~ ~ ~ ~^'~'~--- 'ter'? /~iS~>
- - ~ -; r , __ -- - --
--__ - -~ ,
,,
~u U) ~ti~~ 2SSrl ~~~•1~.. /~"'- ~ w rcr:~„,. ,( ~`/~-- - -~17a 321"
c~__ ~ _ ~ ---~------ -- -----------~ --~-~----= ---- ----==------~
.. .~'~vr.v... - .. .. ,.. n r ~k~'rtvtn!^o~!^~c!^•• '..i/,. ,S.R`t~~ ~..~"A^ a R:Fr<n*~.K..,!1' 1`ly'i..'d, ~ r. ~in,:P~/~ ;i r~'J'.ti ...
';~~r
i
J • , ,~1 ~
v ~..,~,~. q~ j~i,~sso~Jr~ ~~- C.
~ ~,~ ; T o y C~~~~%'~ iii
/~ ~ ~
fr! Jll~ r_' '~
;4 ~ ~~'~~..~
._.___ -_..L__- ~~..** ~-
--_-__l 2 ~ ~~
- __-_4r~~t Z~ ~ ~3 ~
----- Paz ~ ~ ~ y'y
---- --_-``4~4n- /l~)G7~
c.~ ~C~11>J-~~
~~ ~ ~~ /' ~--- oZ~-.~ ,,' ~c~Cz- e GAT ~ ~/i ~: ~~ / ~< --0~ i ~'
~-------
,~. ~~- ~ ~'Tr
i ~ t~ _
~
~
~,~~ 1.,~,1so~ ZSI
~ ~ -
i I ~ i r'on ~~ 30 ~ e.dr ~ ~ e lc~ ~ . --------- `7 `la` - - o~ 3
• ?~ r2~~ I ~ ~ / O Y i4~~-J i ~J~-- ~~V • ~~A tr 01~:~ ~ ~1 _ _ 7 ~ `f - ~.~ ~
_
+ 1 ~ +
r "-~ ~ v' C .J7L~(•~--1L~1/G~/}~ '~V .1 L/.--- I ~~--a V ~t
./ ' f ~ 055 C.~~f~...~~ 12 7. Z ya/~?~ -7l Z _ ~~,9~
,~ ~ ~ ~ ?/J tau ~J ~~10~~ ~/t~~! ~" ~ ;~ ~~ % y'r CvL~~ /~~ (~~_ ~~~`~ - `~l ~`/
~
-
~~ 1 ~ Z t_ ~ ,,
)~ ~ J c /l//~,l ~ ~ ~ - ~'c s ~_~1.-:/_ '/r '~ ` C~~ ~ . /fir ~~
Y
1. ? _ ~ -
-
/ ~i
> ~" ~ e Y~ ~~ ~ ~ ~s3 ~'4
~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ r~~- , ~ r 1 7__ ~ I 3~_
-
--~-
-----
~
~-~ 7
- 1 -~
J _..~..-_-.- ~J
_;,
/
! ~~
(" - 7
cQ.v (.. ~~~ _ ;
~ (5 ~ J a. =fit. 2 c ^ ~- ~ . ~' ~~ ~., n I;O li /J ,~ ~{ a ~ ~ ~~'~: 3- s-~k..r
,~_
• 5~3 l.. ~ ~-~ ~; G~~ ~~-~ , ~~ l~ .~~~>~ ~ 7T y-i~y~
~.
_. , ~.
- .-
Form .41-1II
~~~ ~I
'~`-
(-O1'111 Z11~-1£3 - __-^ T
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road anc! Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd an a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerf:ain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks ~ Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME
ADDRESS
/„ c
o S ABLE
~~
V
ENE N0.
s~ /- flo qJ
rave ~ . iv+e~5e~n CaS! IV4~~~_ft,0 ~r • ,r,,.~ Va sC91-gly
'~~' .~ ' ~~1''' f~;, ,~ _ ,
~ ,~d~,,
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to inst;all a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
nur nnininn that 1hi~ issllP f.an no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' 1ldministration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road.
111 so usiny Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside high
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt at:tention be givenrto the matter this time. 11n expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
ninn~r
nnnRf= ss
PHONE N0.
J
t~l- r1 ~' ~~,Itit~ c% ~` j r~ _ Q~IJ~ r A. l ~ IC-T('~' ` V ~~ l __ _ _ 5~ ~,7 ~ "" ~ 3
/ ,~
~~ !l
r
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition t:he City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Qecause of t:he increased traffic nn Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
[iesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
Couni:y Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of• approximately 1600. 1-here is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke Country Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before arJ not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
nnnrirrr r~{~"N1" Nl/.
y
r
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition t;he City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light; at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Qecause of the increased traffic on Petters Creek Road, t;his has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
[3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Quilling, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and t:wo schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. 1-here is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside high
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0.
_-__~~.'~.C.1- ~-~j~y~~. X1-1 `'7~'t f`~ 6Y`.-C~ Is/'..~r--~ T]r-- 7 ~ ~ - -,G ~ .1
-~~--~ -
~~~ a -s~ ~-- -- ~`
.,
~_&
~_
,~~ ~~ ~~.
~„ 1 L
\f
'4
+~
i ,~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS __ PHONE N0.
t ~,.~ j
_ > I ~~ 7
~ ~ - . C.z3% -~
(_ f
l_
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition~tfie Cit:y of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Iliyh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
E3ecause of the increased traffic nn Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
t3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety [3uilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an enttrance off Northside iliyh School Road.
Also using Northside Hiyh School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0._
.j ,
-- l~ ~~w ~ ~ '
,..
~ ~, ~- ~ ` b
. /fit ,;~ ~ • ~-
!_J--- ___.___-
~1 1
r A
f' -_
~ }f,~~ ~ i
~'~i' ;,~~-!
~~E ~,
G r i=-- r~. 1 -
~iir,. ~~ ~ ~.t '
-Y_."_-~-- _.
/. ~~ l ~ i
1
_,,,
r
~>,. -
'?.' r _ -~
f ~ .. ( ~ •~ 1~ .
l ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ` ___
f ~ ~ ~ %;
;~. ~ ,,
(i ( ~ --
-, , .
~ r ;,
~~ ~ ,
irk ~ ! (, ~. ~f ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ --
~ ----
~,
--,
.~ ~ ~ , w , __._
_~
i ~' G~ ~ ~"
1 ~~r" A A ~ kI f . _ _
T / ~
l! ~ ~ f ,1
j i, '
,~ ~
,i
r ~i'
~~,- ~ ~_
u ~ ~~ ~
~>>~ , a
i
~~.~
~,
-~~ ~ ~ ago
,~ ~~~, ~
/e
7~
~ys'
'~.3
.~G~~~ c
~-~
r.
i
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of i:he increased traffic on Petters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. having a crossing guard on duty at; cr.rtain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit; pattern for employees of Kroyers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parentis and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Iliyh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
t:he Roanoke Count;y Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Hiyh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given; to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be a~~preciated.
NAMC AdDRESS
t ~~
'~~~((>~C~ PHONE N0.
_ ~ ( _ r_.~
_ ~.
~.
/ y
~,
' ~f.)
~r 1 ,1 . . _, r
_.'
L ~
~~'r °.Jf~cL '~Xfj1lg~~fi1 I! U/D~~ 4"c'~F'.~ ~.r.I~' %c'.•~;:C L~r G~!/~ "~: ~~, ~
j ~ ~ ~ / ,..1 ! !~,
a t'~l ~ ~. ~ ( .
J1 / ~ Y ---
1.
~ \i
r~ ~
,.
'; ~1,,
l
~.~ ~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Ct°eek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' AdministraY,ion office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families, going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this tlnle. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS ___ _ _,_PFIONE N0.
~~nn~ - .
~kWt. -~Y'i+~-V~~~Si~1~' ~ '1?:~~.\'~~S+a_~~' crr~r_~'`,~},1, , ~:,,, `'i ~ ~y
.,
~~ s .~i
~~
(ti/ '
.~ --~ ~ r
v`_' /r UC J ~ ~1~/S r1~ r~. ,s 2 5 L.. A ~'~~ ,(11 ~ ` ~ I/~ ----- ' l~ 7 - o c ~~~
,~,,. S 21 it W ~ ~L (' E:~ ~1 L ~°.-- ~1 S~"_.. __---- ~~ y,~ - r~ G'J~~
~ ~ ~ ~IYA i~w~~r~+,~ _ ~~2~ 895 3
,-
!1 ~ i
~, .
~~_~' g ~ G z- S" f~ Y z
`' ' l ~ _z_
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd an a waiting list, waiting far funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cert:ain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families. going to practic? and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Nigh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ____~_
~~
C ~ ~~ ~
~~
_~'N i stn ~ ri•-i _
~:
/~
~.~.,~~__r..c4-
/~
~1 ~-d c,;~,ckx~
E .`i~~ ~1--~~ ~
" .~
~~
n. 7 ..._%? .c+
~'~ ~r) ~' __----
A~- r' r~ __
PIIONE N0.
j~~~~J(_
[ ~ ~~ '_i
., .> `1,-
L~ ~ ~ ~ "L~
_..~~i_ ~~ ~,_ ___~5~~ -a yes
~~
^i•"
~ J
r~
X3/3 ~~~:~~ ,~.~~ t ~~_-
_~ ~~, ~- ~~~:~z
!! nn
ADDRESS _
S~ -3~ ~ .,.J ~ {..~,-...~ ,~.
i ) /~ ~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety~Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside Nigh School Road are families. going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME _ _
l ~
- ---
~.
'~
~ >:~.
G~~'`~"~
,~
~ t,.;,,
`r
~rt h.te-
t/' ./
7 ` ~
.~
91.~-~-~ ,~~
~,
!) ~,r,~ ~,,, ,-
,~{. ryv
/~ r ~ d.
l,'
~~
ADDR
ESS PiIONE N0.
1
-J ~
i
~
`.J.XLti...:~
.
1_..:~..1.2_.1_~S..7L. S_~1:.---s_
: _ _'J r J~I ~...~
~.-.
\
/
/
~1
¢r
{.
(
- ,,
~ 4
~, , ,
~-
.
/
<.
r
' ~
1/
r~.. s l ,~ ~ - -_._
:~ r
G~~~~~ ; ,~ ~~
i
t
~~ N, AMA ~~p ~ ~.-~-__..-------- --.._~`a_~~~ 1_
~ ___~ !
~~_.- /rte ___Y___ ~ s ./~~~ _~... _ _~1.~:_~
~1 C,:~1 (f I l ~ {~ ~ ~i }•_~~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ !r+ ri 1 r J ~' ~ ri , ~r J /~~ >
.,,~G ~ / ..,,. .,
(.,. ~7c9 a'C"G',,v ~" ~oc,~0 ~:2 Y•!r!f L r". [- ~`~~?~" - ~_- -~ ~~ ..~ _' ~ / C•) ;r'
(~ - - _- r~
Nl LG.`S '[1 r ~~[ ~ l .~`~./, h~~(~ -?~ ~ .'t f ~'~ ~'~~Q~~ .r'°l '`~ j ~ i ~ ~n ~ ~J 1
,,
~ -
~(,~..~.~ ~ Ci 'k'i~(1 t_((, ,(~~~ 1 ~~,~'~~~ J~-~ ~ -~,/~.?..r ~, ~~, ~ V ~ I~~1 U ~~~' _~' ~_.L~ ~; ~~~~ ~ ~ ~=lr~~
~lL~IJG~.~I: l }(~l .r" ,~,> l t"~ rl.~l i.° '~' i :r. %~~:"`_~C c?~~ (/=:J ~;>~i, ~y 5° / ~~~ uG
~,.lrGGtn~. 0~~~~(~; ~~~:~,
(~ ~ }-- T __--- - ~ r -- - ~ I - -
~~ `}~~,~~ ~~/fit t,[!" f1 ~ !~c's_S.L r''.rd r_... .r.._.~^t r~3...i.~L-_~.___._~t•r ur!._ c~-~[/tj~1~; "~' :~. ~,r,^.~ J C
r
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Quilding, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0.
~ L
_ . ~
~+ _- .,~ ~
~-
U
r4 c~
~
Z
A }} //
~D ~'v~ n P W~-ri" `` R-}G~ (A~Jr'x , , _ ~ f•. V U
~
~ ~1C)~ ~~
IA A,
C~
nti
_ //
~v o ~ i~.s u.y
v~ ~- ~J
:~ ~S`"'7 a 7 /~~~ lv ~' ,~,~~ ~~ ~~, ~'~~` ~ , ~ ,~ nr a .S C~_~: ,/ ~~ ~. .
,
ati
~("IU~1~il/~ ~ ~ `~IZ.SO S TDT Ol '1 lvH ~ 1'? /r G+~ . r'`~'j''" t' 1=~1~~ J' .a • Y ?/~
-
r
w~ ~. ~.. e4 ..~..
~' ~ -- ` _,_.._,~ ~~~ ~~ I<<,I ~ ~ ;.fit- , , ,~~
l v
~ ,, , .._`
I
>~ ~~
;~
1
M~ r1 ~ ~
i /.// _
r
~.r
' ~
~~
-
~
.
~,
C_G ~
r . ..
.r
,
t" - ~
...-
'
:,~` •~.' ~ - ~-
' ~~ ~~, > ~.. ~~~~ ~- , ~~, , ~ ~~ ~~ ~ X44 ~~rr~. .~~tn~ -. a
•• - 5 ~ ~~..,c, .~ ~ z - ~~~ ~
~ .~. ... -
. _,
~~
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke tc- install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Raad and Northside High School Raad. It is
our opinion that this issue can rro longer be 3rd on a wa iting list, waiting far funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not salve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/ex,it pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practicf~ and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and s~chaols' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic,
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and oat considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this_ time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME _„ _ _ ADDRESS ,____.___.__.___ ___. ~.____.____PiIONE N0.
~~~~
~..., .. ,
i ~r ~ ~ ~~ ~ ! ,~_ ~'jR_'~~'-- ~~ ~ -- ~'~- - ------~-~- ~~ ~~
~ ~- ~ l~" ?
..
-~ ~__
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High Sr..hool Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funeis.
Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek F;oad, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerl:ain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
aesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practir:e and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this tirne. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME
~' ~~.'~~
~:~
~~.~ ~,~!iiZ
5 (3c(~i-1
,,, z r,l ~l A.
~., ~. ~~~
%~ ~~
~~
1t~ ~ ri-Za
f ~-r~
G.-
~sy
r,
/e'
_
(,
~~. c ~ PEIONE N0. _
__ - -~~c,_~,-O~~.C~ j
1. ~ .~~~11 ~ ~~ ; -ls_~ -- _~'~_~~- ~~ 11.3
1
~~ Q-- ~ -- ----- ? ~ ~ ,_-
~
--~-
_ _ _ ~-1.~1~u__.____ ._ ` ~-~
~" _
~
~' ~'n ~'
' ~--
~. ~.
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanake t.o install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek goad, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty~at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Raad are families goiny to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside Nigh
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0.
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road anti Northside Nigh School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Qecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at cerf;ain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Qesides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety~Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of appro~;imately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Nigh School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families, going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to t:he matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE N0.
~ `S ~ r
--11JfJA 1.J~D~~Q bS~Z~. ~'~EVIL1~-~1 ~P._Nt, ~~2-g~Z7
u~ , ntiv~ r c ~. ~ 7~
`' T s 9 rv
L- ~ ~-e ~S < <v ~~ L v i
.~ 6 :~-~ry~7
bJe, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke tri install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
or.ir opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
[iecause of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has heconu~ a hazardous
situation. Having a crossiny guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
(3esides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety E3uilding, as well as students, parents and stafF of a clay care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside Higf- School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional i;raffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking t:hat prompt attention be given to -the matter l:his t.imc. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAMC _ ADf)RESS __` _ - __ ___ PIIONE N0. __
__t
- -
~~
f -- - ~ --_ __----- --- ~_
. ~ - ~,
- ~ ~-.1 ~---- -- ---- --------- ~_~ ~ ~ c ~ - _ 01.E
~ ~ ~j - _ - ---------- -
r~~- ~ J ,
-~ J~~~ ~
o ~ ~. 3 ~s~
- --Gr~c.l~ _____~ -h-- ~ r---- ~ - -------- -_--- -- -~-~-----__
--
- - -~~
-- - - ~d - --- ----- ------- -------------. ------ -_.. --- -------- --------------
_ 4 7 ~ -- ------
-- -
r~ c . r r
-~,~c~~'~i~~~~m• ---- - -` "s~,~..4077.!~----~_~-------------------_----------`~~n~c-+`~ia3a _
-- ~ ~- J ----------~-p4~q_AQ._.-~A._`_~~ --------------- _ __--_. __----~~a~._~3g-FS
We, the Citizens of Roanoke Valley, petition the City of Roanoke to install a traffic
light at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northside High School Road. It is
our opinion that this issue can no longer be 3rd on a waiting list, waiting for funds.
Because of the increased traffic on Peters Creek Road, this has become a hazardous
situation. Having a crossing guard on duty at certain times is appreciated, but does
not solve the problem.
Besides the usual flow of traffic on Peters Creek Road, this intersection serves as
an entrance/exit pattern for employees of Krogers' Administration office and Roanoke
County Safety Building, as well as students, parents and staff of a day care center,
and two schools with combined enrollment of approximately 1600. There is also a
church with an entrance off Northside High School Road.
Also using Northside High School Road are families going to practice and games on
the Roanoke County Parks & Recreation fields and schools' fields. Northside High
School auditorium is rented to civic groups, creating additional traffic.
We are aware this issue has been addressed before and not considered a priority. We
are now asking that prompt attention be given to the matter this time. An expedient
resolution would be appreciated.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0.
~!5 ~ L~'1NG~~~ Gov /t-r,c.J C~~,L- /_~ ~! `~
/~///e X7.7 S- ~%vvK/i~z~ Drt /e''~'E-= l/~'~ '~7~ t~~~~-
~~ ~ 523.7 ~~/-y~-G--~-G- CCi.~e, /V _W ,~~ G~C~
` C 3~'~ 5' ~ fps C', c 1~ i~ ~.P
L~,1 ~,~,~~?~ ~0°1 Lnk~ eve ;ic~~eYY, yA - a~t153--
o ~,~~ D 1 ~ ~3q~~r3~~FY ~ ~ min `' 1.~,~~ ~ yl' y
,~
,~ ~~
VMIt _._ ~ Zv ¢ /~i7Y.i'4 ~~J=7C /Cd /`JC"~ _
s ~~ ~~~
.502-2/59
85~'-3C,.z 3
~~,.C~3~
~~ 9 -~y~~
' >/> ~~
- C:C (~
-$~'~~
,~_~~_V
3 .- b s ,sJ.":4.... ~.
~~- _ I 7
ink , ` ~ p ~~ ~ -~ ~ 1 ~ ~'J a • ! ~ G (;~ ; ~ ~:r . S'~ '~
1 a W f~i ~ ft l< <~c~n c~
~n Q nLLL'~ 5SS3 ~ly'~P~c~i~,~,~fi ~,~ , ~c~,.~~- ~56?_-~~~~
A A ~ A
l,i.`~
~~
dam'/' ~~ .,9 , s p a u