The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4/6/1992 - RegularO~ (iOAN ~~ ti ~ ~ ~ i -~+~~ca cr j a= ~t~ ~~ ,~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~a 'tea; as sFSCU1CENTEMN~P~ ~ ~/] ~ Q ~A ~ Bcautilul8cgimm~g "/ o j ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA APRIL 6, 1992 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THIS IS A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUDGET WORK SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE TAX RATES. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (4:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call AT 4:05 P.M. FM ARRIVED AT 4:15 P.M. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS LBE ADDED CITIZEN COIVIlVIENTS AT THE END OF AFTERNOON AND EVENING SESSION. BLJ EXPRESSED REGRET REGARDING DISCUSSION WITH SCHOOL i BOARD AT 3/24/92 WORK SESSION. C. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to Discuss a Potential School and County Bond Referendum and Consideration of Projects for Inclusion. DR WILSON PRESENTED SCHOOL BOARD PROPOSED BOND PROJECTS = $6,760,000 ECH PRESENTED COUNTY PROPOSED BOND PROJECT = $5,183,000 BOARD CONSENSUS TO SUPPORT A BOND REFERENDUM. ECH AND BAYES WILSON TO BRING BACK PROPOSED BOND REFERENDUM ON 4/28/92. 1 CITIZEN SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO CLOSING MT. PLEASANT LIBRARY 10 CITIZENS SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF BOND REFERENDUM. 2. Second Work Session on School and County Budget CONTINUED FOLLOWING EVENING SESSION RECESS - 6:15 P.M. RECONVENE - 7:03 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS a 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Real Estate Tax Rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. ONE CITIZEN SPOKE SUPPORTING ONE-TIME ONLY EXTRA HOLIDAY FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEE IN LIEU OF RAISE AND SUPPORT FOR INCREASE IN UNAPPROPRIATED BAIANCE. 2. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Personal Property Tax Rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation. NO ONE SPOKE 3. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Machinery and Tools Tax Rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. NO ONE SPOKE WORK SESSION CONTINUED (7:20 P.M.) ECH PRESENTED RESPONSE TO I.BE'S BUDGET SUGGESTIONS. BOARD CONSENSUS (3-2) TO LIMIT COUNTY EMPLOYEE SALARIES TO 3% INSTEAD OF 3-1/2% WHICH WOULD EQUAL SCHOOL'S SAIARY INCREASE. I.BE SUGGESTED USING FUNDS FOR CAPITAL NEEDS HCN SUGGESTED CATEGORIZING SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET BOARD CONSENSUS TO CONTINUE USE OF CELLUTAR PHONES BUT TO MONITOR USE. BOARD CONSENSUS TO SUPPORT HEALTH DEPT. CHIP PROGRAM. DILLON RULE POSITION PAPER PMM ASKED FOR BOARD CONIIViENT. SUGGESTED REMOVING OR MODIFYING FIItST PARAGRAPH. E. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1- 344 (A) (1) To discuss a personnel matter FM MOTION AT 8:35 P.M. - URC E.' CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-4692-1 BLJ MOTION AT 9:18 P.M. - URC G. ADJOifItNMENT BLJ MOTION AT 9:20 P.M. - UW 4 '` O~ ROAN ~ F ` ~ A j ALL-AM~ICA Ctilf a= C~~~n~ ~~ ,~u~~t~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ESO; ea s~SQU1CENTENN~P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ (~ A Btaun~ttlBtgirtrting o j ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA APRIL 6, 1992 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THIS IS A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUDGET WORK SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE TAX RATES. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (4:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to Discuss a Potential School and County Bond Referendum and Consideration of Projects for Inclusion. 2. Second Work Session on School and County Budget D. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1- 344 (A) E. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Real Estate Tax Rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. 2. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Personal Property Tax Rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation. 3. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on setting a Machinery and Tools Tax Rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. G. ADJOURNMENT a AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1992 RESOLUTION 4692-1 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~'Y~ a~`~ ~/. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors C ` AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1992 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 6, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Real Estate Tax Rate. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors at the March 10, 1992 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992 as follows: Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. This public hearing is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Real Estate Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992. No ordinance which imposes or increases any tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days shall have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1-504). The last advertisement was published on March 30, 1992; therefore, the tax rate is scheduled for adoption on April 14, 1992. Respectfully submitted, Approved by Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management & Budget ----- County Administrator ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens _ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~' ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 6, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Personal Property Tax Rate. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors at the March 10, 1992 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Personal Property Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992 as follows: Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. This public hearing is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Personal Property Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992. No ordinance which imposes or increases any tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days shall have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1- 504). The last advertisement was published on March 30, 1992; therefore, the tax rate is scheduled for adoption on April 14, 1992. Respectfully submitted, Approved by,• 2 ,~ ~ - ^ ~ y Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management & Budget County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 6, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Machinery and Tools Tax Rate. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors at the March 10, 1992 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Machinery and Tools Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992 as follows: Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. This public hearing is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Machinery and Tools Tax Rate for the calendar year 1992. No ordinance which imposes or increases any tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days shall have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1- 504). The last advertisement was published on March 30, 1992; therefore, the tax rate is scheduled for adoption on April 14, 1992. Respectfully submitted, Approved by ,C~ L~2~ -w.,-' ~o~'~I Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management & Budget County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER C-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 6, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to Discuss Potential School and County Bond Referendum and Consideration of Projects for Inclusion COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is a joint Work Session with School Superintendent Bayes Wilson and the School Board to consider whether or not the County should go forward with a small general bond referendum. Staff will be prepared to provide general information on potential items that could be included in the bond issue. ~ii' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ck p0AN0'FF G ti A z z ov .. a reaa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 April 3, 1992 (~C~~x~#~ ~# ~a~xx~~~e P.O_ BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 C~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: (703) 772-2005 You may recall that we discussed a number of budget requests during the work session at our last Board meeting. The staff and I have tried to allocate the $230,000 health care savings to those items where there was a Board consensus. Several issues needed further information and are presented in this memo for your consideration at our next work session on April 6. A portion of the $230,000 has been allocated as follows: Additional one-half per cent salary increase to match the increase proposed for School employees $ 102,500 ° Increase in the Mental Health Services allocation to $1 per capita 9,348 ° Increase in the Health Department allocation to match the State allocation 20,000 $ 131,848 After funding the three items listed above, $98, 152 will be left to be allocated. There are also several outstanding issues that will require discussion. They are shown in the table below: Principal & Interest Cost FY 1992-93 Rear-loading refuse truck $ 98,000 $ 23,750 Fire truck (Mason Cove) 240,000 29,067 Cable TV (County's share) 55,000 N/A Vinton ladder truck (replace ladder, County's share) 130,000 N/A Street lights 10,000 N A $533,000 $ 52,817 The staff and I would recommend to the Board the following items for the allocation of the remaining funds: I support the use of the cable television program for economic development and educational purposes. However, not having received ® Recycled Paper -2- ._ a report from Mr. Musser's Regional Cable Television Committee with regard to the cost of operating this program, I believe it is better to defer the funding of this item at this time. ° I recommend that the County match Vinton's $130,000 allocation for replacement of the ladder on Vinton's ladder truck from the Unappropriated General Fund Balance NOW. This equipment should be repaired as quickly as possible. We are getting coverage from Roanoke City at the present time, and that can be continued in the interim. We will continue our efforts to recover this cost from Grumman and will reimburse the General Fund Balance when we do. ° As you will recall, the proposed budget presented to you on March 24 included funding for the lease-purchase of two new ambulances and one new trash truck. I am still proposing we purchase the new trash truck through a lease-purchase. However, I recommend that we purchase the ambulance for Hollins Rescue Squad at full cost and, instead of lease-purchasing a new ambulance for Mason Cove, I propose that we reimburse Mason Cove for the cost of the used ambulance they purchased this year. That vehicle is in good condition and will serve us well until more funds are available in the future. ° I recommend that we lease-purchase one new fire truck for Mason Cove Fire Department. The lead time for delivery of a new truck is such that we need to fund only one-half year lease-purchase payment in FY 1992-93. ° The civic leagues and County staff have been working on suggested changes to our street light program. We will have that for you at our April 28 meeting. They are asking for an additional $10,000 and I would recommend funding that increase. These recommendations are summarized below: Remaining funds available Lease-purchase fire truck - Mason Cove Fire Used ambulance - reimburse Mason Cove Rescue Ambulance - Hollins Rescue Squad Street lights Funds originally budgeted for lease- purchase of two ambulances 31,775 $ 17,360 I would like to reach agreement on the allocation of the remaining budget items on April 6 if possible. We still must do a lot of work to prepare real estate and personal property bills for mailing by May 5. We will also be prepared to discuss a potential bond issue with you. Please let me know if you have questions or suggestions. Very truly yours, Elmer C. Hodge C1 County Administrator $ 98,152 Department (29,067) Squad (8,500) (65,000) (10,000) ECH/meh ADDITIONAL BUDGET WORK SESSION INFORMATION A 2 a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 March 27, 1992 TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: eanna W. Gordon, Assistant Superintendent ane W. James, Supervisor of Media Services SUBJECT: Instructional Use of Proposed Television Studio Facility As communications technologies have improved and become more readily available for use in instruction, we within Roanoke County Schools have sought ways to economically utilize these technologies to provide optimum instructional opportunities for our students. The proposed studio provides an excellent way to more fully utilize the expertise of our teaching staff and the numerous community resources available to us. Using this facility, it will be possible to transmit live broadcasts via cable or to videotape presentations for subsequent transmission and/or circulation. The types of programming we envision include: • Guest Speakers such as subject area "experts," business leaders, authors, or government officials who are willing to make a single presentation but whose schedule would not permit presentations in each school; • Special lectures, demonstrations or lessons by teachers within our system who have particular interests or expertise not common to all schools; • Student presentations, such as musical performances, theater arts, forensics, athletic achievements or academic projects; • Inservice opportunities for teachers; • Special programs for PTA of parent groups; • Informational/news programs on special topics such as safety or drug/alcohol abuse; • Programs promoting special events such as National Library Week; and • Special needs programming, such as elementary foreign language, global education or gifted education. All of the above types of programming could be generated and utilized with existing school staff, provided that technical assistance for filming and editing is available through the operational budget of the Public/Education/Government Studio. We appreciate your continued support as we seek additional ways to broaden opportunities available to students, teachers and citizens of Roanoke County. c: Dr. Bayes E. Wilson, Superintendent ~ .. 18 '.~50. 88 A Berwti/WBeginang RETA R. GUSHER. CPA DIRECTOR 1dEIrIORA~TDIIM TO: Dr. Harry Nickens FROM: Reta R. Busher, Director, Management and Budget DATE: April 3, 1992 SUBJECT: FY1992-93 School Budget MANAGEMENT & BUDGET The following is provided in response to your March 27, 1992, request for additional information with regard to the FY1992-93 School Budget. 1. The results of a telephone survey on teacher salary increases proposed by neighboring localities are as follows: C~nu~y of iRattnnkr a. Roanoke City. 3$ + Tier. The percent increase associated with a tier varies depending on the tier. Approximately 20$ of the teacher population will receive 3$ + Tier. A teacher will remain on a tier for three years. b. Botetourt County. The School Board has proposed a flat 5~ raise for teachers. c. Craig County. The School Board has proposed a flat 5~ raise for teachers. d. Franklin County. The School Board has proposed a 6$ raise; however, they have not yet received sufficient local money to fund this increase. e. Bedford County. The School Board is proposing an average 1$ increase. Some teachers may receive 2$ if they are due an "experience" step movement. f . City of Salem. The School Board has proposed a f lat 4$ salary increase for teachers. P.O. BOX 29600 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24016-0796 • <703> 772-2021 Dr. Nickens Memo Page 2 April 3, 1992 2. The health care cost savings for the schools would equate to what ~ salary increase? The amount originally budgeted for school health care cost increases in FY1992-93 was $1,200,000. With the wonderful bids that were received, the health care cost increase was revised downward to $750,000, a savings of $450,000. The School Board has proposed to use this savings to increase their employee health care contribution to 74$. This equates to a $25 per person benefit. Roanoke County's contribution is at 83$. A one percent salary increase for all school employees is approximately $525,000. The School Board has proposed to use the Cigarette Tax Revenue to provide a one-half percent salary increase for all school employees. 3. Other benefit changes included in the FY1992-93 School budget are as follows: a. Addback 2 professional leave days. b. Increase unused sick-leave pay-out for retirees from $20 to $30 per day. The County currently pays $20 per day. c. Increase substitute teachers' pay from $42 to $45 per day. d. Increase teacher tuition assistance from $39 to $45 per hour. RRB/mwr cc: All Board Members Elmer Hodge, County Administrator ~ ~•~' n Na N~ '_'~ ~C ~rri O~xi Z~ ~ a, ~ ~ x r~ x `~ ~y x ~ -M~. O x ~ `~~i ~ ~ n C C rny 4~+ ~ • ~ y ~ :n S ^ :A FMS' fA ~ V] CA ~+ ~ u aQ ~ O `Cy ~ h "Ly ~ ~r b ~ b ~ b ~ b M ~ ~ ~ C n CC'4 ~ ~ " C'4 CC n C"1 C i C"t C fD C C 0 CD ~C D ~ D ~ D ~ ~ .•.• ~ u u u u u u ~ n , O p ~ ~ ~ ~ J W W ~ ~ 00 S CJ1 O~ ~ C p ~ ,Y • O oo ? ~ ~ ~' p cra y y ~. to p ~• n ~ A C =, r-~ ~••~ N ~ A ~• ~ y W 00 ~ ~p ~ W F~+ p ~ ~ z ~ ~ N S ~ ~ ~ r-+ ~ ~ ~ N ~Np ~y ~ W N O ~. ~ ~ `~ o ~• ~ o + + -~ + -~ n y '' ~ J o0 ~ c~ m o ~ z N ~ J ~ V? J N S ~ ".3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_. p p y z ~ o ~ w ~.. oo ~ C rn 'v ~ ° o H ~ ~ ~? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~zy \ C~+ e-r ~y r•+ ~"' ~ ~ VI 00 J tr !~ N E A* ~ N O~0 N OWO J W J ~q ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ n ~ F° ~ .A ~ z W ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ y ~ A A ~ ONO ~ N ~ i..i '"C CD O ~ ~ D p O n Q ~ O H O n O °z b ~ ~ bd A C08T COMPARISON BY BRANCH BOR THE THREE PART-TIME SITES Bent Mountain Branch Salary Part-time Library Assistant $ 8,385 [18 hrs per week @ $8.3213 per hr./52 weeks per year./+FICA 24 years experience in system] Part-time Page 1,802 [6 hrs per week @ $5.3652 per hr./52 weeks per year./+FICA 8 years experience in system] Sub-Total $10,187 Utilities & Telephone $ 439 Periodicals & Subscriptions $ 699 Materials $ 3,000 TOTAL $14,325 Mt. Pleasant Branch Salary Part-time Library Assistant $ 7,653 [21 hrs per week @ $6.510 per hr./52 weeks per year./+FICA 4 months experience in system] Utilities & Telephone $ 1,107 Periodicals & Subscriptions $ 221 Materials 3 000 TOTAL $11,981 Catawba Book Station Salary Part-time Page $ 1,427 [6 hrs per week @ $4.250 per hr./52 weeks per year./+FICA 3 1/2 months experience in system.] The Library has no other expenses at this site. TOTAL $ 1,427 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PRIORITY LISTING 1. 2505 Electric Rd. -Our Lady of Nazareth Church 2. 1887 Electric Rd. -Good Shepard Lutheran Church 3. Colonial Ave. S.W. and Ogden Rd. S.W. 4. Main Entrance to Cave Spring H.S. Chapparal Dr. 5. 4203 Electric Rd. -Ogden and Electric Rd. S.W. 6. Dow Hollow between I-81 bridges - no water main 7. Glenvar High School 8. Williamson Rd. and Commander Dr. N.W. 9. Water Fall Dr. and Sundance Circle N.W. 10. Route 24 and Baker Dr. 11. 6 Hydrants between -Salem line and #9 Fire Station -West Main St. 12. 2730 Ogden RD., Colonial American Bank 13. Colonial Ave. S.W. and Girard Dr. S.W. 14. Colonial Ave. S.W. and Georgetown Rd. S.W. 15. Intersection of SR 638, 1175 and 774 -Fort Lewis, no water main 16. Colonial Ave. S.W. and OverDale Rd S.W. 17. Manassas Dr. and Antietam Dr. S.W. 18. Manassas Dr. and Bunker Hill Dr. S.W. 19. RTE 24 and Maple Wood Dr. 20. RTE 24 and Linden Wood Dr. 21. Plantation Rd. N.W. and Santee Rd. 22. Whipledale and Twilight Rd. N.W. 23. Finney Dr. and Cambridge Dr. 24. Pedigo Lane and Cambridge Dr. 25. Medeco Entrance off Hawley Dr. - no water main 26. Woodland Dr. and Colonial Ave. S.W. 27. Valley Forge and Bunker Hill Dr. S.W. 28. Hardy Rd. and Finney Dr. 29. 6231 Nell Circle N.W. 30. Manassas Dr. and View Ave. S.W. 31. Sugar Ridge Rd. S.W. at Old Barn Circle 32. Hollins Rd. N.E. Roanoke Fish & Oster 33. Starkey Rd. S.W. and Eden Ln. S.W. 34. Intersection of Poor Mtn Rd. and West River Rd. - no water main 35. Canter Dr. and Lakeland Dr. S.W. 36. Hugh Ave. N.W. and Peyton St. N.W. 37. 3203 Woodland Dr. S.W. 38. Northlakes Dr. N.W. and East Dale N.W. 39. Williamson Rd. N.W. at entrance to Roanoke Valley Christian School 40. 3340-3350 Block of Woodland Dr. S.W. 41. Glenvar Elementary School Entrance 42. Poor Mtn. Rd. at R.R. Crossing - no water main 43. Intersection of SR 639 & 882 - no water main 44. Hugh Ave. N.W. and Estes St. N.W. 45. Whipledale Ave. N.W. and Quail Hollow N.W. 46. Peyton St. N.W. and Estes St. 47. Hollins Rd. and Garman Dr. N.W. 48. 5265 Northspring Dr. N.W. 49. May Fair Dr. at Blue Ridge Beverage - no water main 50. 5416 Plantation Rd. N.W. 51. Deer Park Dr. and Heather Hill N:W. 52. 602 Magnolia St. N.W. 53. Hollins Rd. and Carlos Dr. N.W. 54. Williamson Rd. N.W. at Nelms Dr. 55. Harbor Wood Dr. at Green Hill Circle - no water main 56. Hollins Rd at Trevillian 57. Hollins Rd. at Beaumont 58. Garst Mill Rd. at Hollowdale S.W. 59. 6339 Nell Dr. 60. 7016 Plantation Rd. 61. Eveningwood Ln and Northlakes Dr. 62. Summer Dr. and Evening Wood Ln. 63. 544 Water Oak Dr. N.W. 64. Plantation Rd. and Petty Ave. 65. Williamson Rd. at Enon Baptist 66. Hollins Rd. at Shadwell Dr. 67. 3434 Electric Rd. S.W. - K-92 68. St. RTE 777 at I-81 Bridges - no water main 69. Brambleton Ave. at Old Cave Spring Rd. -Central Fidelity Bank side 70. Daughtry Rd. and SR 1146 - no water main 71. Alleghany Dr. at Givens Tyler Rd. - no water main 72. Alleghany Dr. between I-81 bridges - no water main 73. Alleghany Dr. at Givens Ave - no water main 74. 4955 Northlakes Dr. 75. Summer Dr. and North Garden Ln 76. Mason Park Dr. and Winter Park Dr. 77. Willett and Hastings S.W. 78. West Main St. in front of Dixie Caverns Auto Parts 79. Northlakes and Green Tree Ln 80. Barley Rd at rear of Ponterfield Dist. - no water main 81. 5416 Plantation Rd 82. Williamson Rd. and Dent Rd. 83. Intersection of SR 639 and 737 - no water main 84. Tinker View and Shadwell Dr. N.W. 85. Locust Grove Ln near the Church - no water main 86. Benois Road SW at railroad tracks. 87. Franklin Road SW at Buck Mountain Road SW. 88. Franklin Road SW and 5000 block of Stable Road SW. 89. Valley Avenue SW and Meadowview Road SW. 90. Valley Avenue SW and Booker Road SW. 91. Booker Road SW at the Roanoke County Leisure Arts Building. ti MEMORANDUM TO: Reta B. Busher FROM: Diana Rosapepe DATE: February 21, 1992 BIIBJECT: Changes in CIP Proposal for Hollins Branch Library When the original proposal for the relocation of the Hollins Branch Library was made, several factors affecting total cost were not considered. The attached revised proposal reflects an increase caused by the following factors: •Increase in total number sq. feet from 15,000 to 17,000 to -meet State standards of .6 sq. ft. of space per citizen, based on a projected population of 28,000+ by the year 2003. -allow curatorial space for documents and other items related to the history of Roanoke County which are currently in storage. •Higher construction costs per square foot of $71 vs. $65 [$71 = avg. cost for one-story library construction in the VA/NC region during the past year.) •Higher engineering and planning fees, currently estimated by Engineering to be approximately 10~ of construction costs. •Realistic cost of furnishings, including adequate seating for patrons, shelving for a 90,000 volume collection, and a security system for the document collection. •Automation costs for system MUX and additional terminals. •Personnel costs [salary and benefits] for a professional librarian and one library assistant. •Consultant fee to assist in planning, grant application, and ADA compliance. These factors should also be noted: -Plans for space for a Roanoke County History Room might be a favorable influence in an LSCA grant application process, if the County chooses to pursue that option. -Public libraries will be heavily impacted by ADA requirements and, of course, any new building would be subject to its provisions. Current available library literature projects 2-4$ of construction and furnishing costs would be necessary to build in compliance with ADA. If the sale of the existing building generated sufficient funds to offset the cost of a new site, the total cost of the project would be $1,527,000, a net increase of $452,000 over the proposal in the FY1992-96 CIP. ' County of Boanore YY1993-1997 Capital Zmprovemeat Prograa Project Request Vora ?Y1992-1993 1. Department: LIBRARY 2. Project Title: Hollins Branch Library. Relocation 3. Project Number: 4. Project Status: New First Year in CIP Resubmission Page` FY1992-96 CIP p.45 In Progress (Describe) 5. Departmental Rank (Urgent, Essential, etc.) Explain: Necessary. This project is designed to replace a decaying facility which is undersized for current use. 6. Departmental Priority (1,2,3, etc.): 1 7. Project Description/Location (Attach Map): Relocation of present Hollins library to a visible location in the Hollins district. _ This facility should be 17,000 sq. ft., with parking for 65 cars. It requires new construction and land acquisition. [No site has been chosen so no map is attached.] 8. Project Justification: The present facility, with 6,500 sq ft., will be serving more than 28,000 citizens within 10 years. It _is now the second-busiest library in the Roanoke valley, with an annual circulation of 164,951 in 1991. To meet standards, it should encompass .6 sq. ft. -for each resident in~the service area. It should also be used to house unique materials, currently in storage, -related to the. history -of Roanoke~County. ~- I i . } ~ ,J r 9. Project Schedule (start date, completion date, explain any date changes): The ~roiect should take fourteen months to com- Qlete. Exact date would be dependent on passage of a bond issue. 10. Project Origin (Civic Group, Board Request, County Administrator Request, Team Request, Department Request, Other):_ This project originated from a departmental request, supported by the Library Board. 11. Project Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan: This nroiect type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 12. Impact If Project Not Funded: The current facility is less than 1/2 the size and has 1/3 the seating space necessary to meet standards. Inadequate shelving s ace limits collection growth and citizen access to materials. Heavy use has caused a deteri- oration of the building and its furnishings ---- - I3. Project Alternatives: __ The present building could be remodeled to add 10,500 sq. ft. at a reduced construction cost. This would retain a highly visible and convenient location but would require maximum use of an irregularly-sha ed lot --. m c c ti v v • 0 a` .: W U -- 2 - g m -- J ~ Q 1 O O '_ O O F- c7 O =~ ~ i:-:y. O LL ~ ~ N :2 t11 :` N ~ _ ~ ~ i - ~~ pp Qs = ' ~O I _ ~ _- } LL - W J - I U ~! ~ - W ' O O O O O O O~ O ;= O O O O I O O O O O O I~ O O er 111 er N C1 N Q1 N Q1 N ~-i f'~7 ~ ~ ~'~ fr1 M '~ ri ':- r1 ~ r-~ O O O C O ~:- O ~ O O O O O = O O N ~ ~ ~ N .. ~ __ t11 fr'1 l11 f'r1 ~ ~ _ 4 W ~ ~ ~ _- ~ Z ~_ ~ -_ Q LL a = -- o = z ~- q p -= = O Z c c O c O c m o E •~ ~ _ ~ _<_< ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ m e • ~ c _ ~ ~ 0 .::.::. .. _: n ~~~~ e U W ~ ~ Y > > ~ m o o i +~ ~ ~ . .... ~ •~~~-~ a :~ ~ e O < ~ 0 2 ; Y ; a .~ a ~ ~ a c ~ ~ ~ ~ ` c ~ ~ t o :~:- a:='' _ ~ : :. ~ o : ~ a e t a H e ~ w v ~i ~ __ _ ~ ~ v~ O z U a E 0 v m 0 c 4 O a Q ~ O~ 0 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 _ _ : __ ° o O ~ 00 ~c .~ _ :;_ ~, ~ a~ 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 O O :~ ;;. _ :: o c m ~ ~ . w >:_ 3 o O O O :~ _ W O O O O ~ O O ~ =:= ~= O O O ~ 1D O ~p .-_ ~O ~ O 1 O O O O O O • O O O . :=- ~__ =:~ :: O O O }~ LL 10 ~ O ~ 1p O ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ :: =__ :_= O O O Q } ~ ~ ~ O ~ =- ~ ~ O c~ - O - 1 __ U1 - ~ •rl = .~ ~ - •~ • ~ .,~ .. «. a :- _ :`:~ o .. D U ~ 0 ~ o m o` ~ O '~~ c a cA 5 rr w «. 0` a M c ~ a ~ ~ s ° : -= m c m 0 0 C C O ~~ a O Q c° ° ° ~ ~ o o O ~ ~ ~r 0 er 0 ~ ~ 0 o O 0 o O ~ o o O ~ o o ~ N ri ~ ~ O O O O ~ O O O w ~ • } LL O O N ~ ~ ~ O O p O O O O ~ O O O 00 OD ~p } N r-1 ~ O O O O O O ~ ~ O O p } ~ ~ O O ~ ~ LL N ~ ~ LL A ~ • +~ ro ^ A~ •~I ,~ a cn ~ ~ U N ~ W ~ H •~ ~ ~ : y a ~ o H . r N 17. Notes/Assumptions for Cost Estimates and Additional Personnel: Construction costs are based on the current average of new, one- story library construction in the VA/NC area Site costs are offset by the sale of the current building Furnishings and auto- mation costs estimated by MIIX, number of terminals, and level II ' library requirements Additional staff would be a Branch Librarian (Grade 21; $27,713 salary and benefits] and a Library Assistant [Grade 11; 517,600 salary and benefitsl - 18. Other Comments: (Highlight Changes from FY1992-96 CIP) This proposal shows an increase of $452,000 over the FY1992 96 CIP, primarily due to increased construction and engineering costs and a slight enlargement in the size of the building to meet standards based on projected population size It also adds appropriate furnishings and automation costs for this sized building. Submitted By : i ~" J ~ Title: Assistant Director Date: February 21, 1992 PARKBOND April 6, 1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR CONSIDERATION IN A BOND ISSUE ------------------------------------------- BALL FIELD AND COURT RENNOVATIONS 194,000 TENNIS COURT RENNOVATIONS 170,000 SHELTER AND PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT RENNOVATION 78,000 OUTDOOR LIGHTING RENNOVATION 86,000 TOTAL RENNOVATIONS 528,000 11 BALLFIELDS AT 40,000 EACH 440,000 PURCHASE OF LAND 32,000 TOTAL 1,000,000 Additional monies will be needed to maintain new ball fields and/or facilities included in the bond program. f r Q /4 A I N A G E Development of Stormwater Management Master Plan ~ 300,000 Remedial Projects (from Master Plan) $ 200,000 Major Projects $ 350,000 Minor Projects (Maintenance) $ 150_,_000 Tota 1 $1 , 000 , 000 Benefits of a Comprehensive stormwater Management Program A comprehensive stormwater management plan involves developing a watershed "master plan", which identifies the most appropriate control measures and optimum locations to control watershed-wide impacts. This approach typically involves combinations of the following: (a) strategically locating a single stormwater detention facility (as opposed to several smaller detention ponds); (b) providing stream channel improvements where necessary; and (c) nonstructural measures such as parkland acquisition and rloodproof~n4 to supplement structural control measures. The master plan approach offers significant advantages over the piecemeal approach, including: reductions in capital and in operating and maintenance costs; reductions in the risk of downstream flooding and erosion; opportunities to manage existing stormwater problems; increases in land development opportunities; increased opportunities for recreational uses of facilities; potential contributions from land and real estate development; and conformity with land use planning issues. ROANOKE REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Priority watersheds 1. Glade Creek 2. Cole Hollow Brook 3. Mason Creek 4. Tinker Creek 5. Peters Creek 6. Carvin Creek 7. Lick Run 8. Back Creek 9. Ore Branch 10. Murray Run 11. Mudlick Creek 12. Dry Branch 13. Gish Branch Participation with Roanoke City, Salem, Vinton Roanoke County share - $250,000 - $300,000 M A J O R P R O J E C T S 1. Sierra Drive/Fenwick Drive Description: County owned sinkhole receives runoff from subdivision which floods adjacent properties Estimated Cost: $75,000 Magisterial District: Hollins 2. Green Valley Description: Poor overall drainage contributes to property damage Estimated Cost: $75,000 Magisterial District: Cave Spring 3. Nottingham Hills Area Description: Channel improvements Estimated Cost: $75,000 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills 4. Mason Creek Description: Residential flooding along Mason Creek Estimated Cost: $75,000 Magisterial District: Catawba 5. Wolf Creek Description: Residential flooding and erosion Estimated Cost: $50,000 Magisterial District: Vinton MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer Hodge FROM: Leesa Dalton, Chairman Library Board of Trustees DATE: April 5, 1992 SUBJECT: INCLUSION OF A PROVISION IN THE UPCOMING BOND ISSUE FOR A NEW BRANCH LIBRARY AT HOLLINS The Hollins Library has been a topic of discussion among the Library Board for several years. It is the second busiest library in the county system, having an annual circulation in 1991 of 164,951. Unfortunately, the current facility has only 6,500 square feet. It has limited parking, no handicapped access and inadequate shelving space which limits collection growth and patron access to materials. While renovation of the existing facility is an option, it is not a viable one. The renovation would require maximum use of a small, irregularly-shaped lot and would not necessarily alleviate the parking problem. Further, because of the population growth in the Hollins area, the library will be serving more than 28,000 citizens in 10 years. The building should be 17,000 square feet, with parking for 65 vehicles. Another option would be to coordinate with Roanoke City and construct a joint facility, similar to the Blue Ridge Library which we constructed and currently operate with Botetourt County. While this may be attractive on its face in that construction and operating costs may be shared by the two jurisdictions, it may prove to be quite troublesome in the long run. The County has already encountered "problems" with its contribution to the operating budget of the Blue Ridge Library. Were it not for the observations made by two of our current Library Board members who served on the joint committee to review operating costs, the County would have been responsible for paying more than its share of the operating budget of the joint facility, based on patron usage. The discrepancy in the figure recommended by the joint committee and the one which appeared in the library budget for 1992-93 was discovered during our regular meeting in January. On behalf of the Board of Trustees, I urge you to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that they include a provision in the upcoming bond issue for a new branch library at Hollins. In addition to offering better service to the citizens of the Hollins area, the new branch could house the Roanoke County historical collection, which is currently in storage and which might possibly afford us the opportunity to receive additional monies fron the state in the form of grants. It goes without saying, of course, that the monies realized from the sale of the existing building could be used to offset the expense of the new facility. There are currently several possible sites listed for sale along Peters Creek Road. In our opinion, to postpone erecting a new facility would result not only in reduced services to the citizens of the Hollins area, but also in increased expense. We firmly believe that this is a necessary project and one worthy of immediate attention. Thank you for your assistance. Please find attached a copy of Diana Rosapepe's revised version of the CIP Proposal for the Hollins branch which contains more detailed information than that contained herein. Both Diana and I, as well as several other Library Board members, plan to be at Monday's meeting and we will be willing to answer any questions that you or the Supervisors may have. Should you need me in the meantime, please call me at 989-0000. COUNTY OF ROANOKE HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS FY 1992-93 BUDGET APRIL 6, 1992 WIJNIi~N[$~~IGi*~AG~tCY : f~9(I~-9~' A~Titr4L : 7991..92:> ~~F~GI`~" ~99~~ 93a R~Q~T 199~h-~3' P~tE>#?~S~D' ADULT CARE CENTER OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY $4,000 $4,000 $5,000 $4,000 ADULT CARE CENTER VAN 2,500 0 0 0 ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS (ARC) 5,000 5,000 62,270 5,000 BETHANY HALL 0 0 5,000 0 CHILD ABUSE 8 NEGLECT COORDINATING COUNCIL 2,720 2,720 3,500 2,720 COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES INFORMATION AND REFERRAL CENTER 2,500 2,500 4,760 2,500 VIRGINIA SILVER STAR FOUNDATION 0 0 100 0 FAMILY SERVICE OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY 2,500 2,500 3,500 2,500 FIFTH DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT 8~ TRAINING CONSORTIUM 0 2,500 3,550 2,500 FREE CLINIC OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS 10,000 10,000 17,523 10,000 PLANNED PARENTHOOD 500 500 500 ROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES 1,333 1,333 1,400 1,333 ROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER 0 0 1,000 0 THE SALVATION ARMY 0 0 5,000 0 TINKER MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES 3,500 3,500 5,000 3,500 TRUST 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER 0 0 1,000 0 CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER 0 0 500 0 COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN ARTS COUNCIL OF THE BLUE RIDGE 0 0 1,000 0 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH INVEST. PROJECT{CHIP) 0 0 19,600 ---------- 0 ---------- TOTAL ---------- $46,053 ---------- $46,053 $151,203 $46,053 COUNTY OF ROANOKE CULTURAL AND OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS FY1992-93 BUDGET APRIL 6, 1992 O~NTR16lk71UNS '. '990-9~ ACTi1AL' :1:991 ~92<' i3~iD~E~" :. '1:992-93 ..:E~~G2UI*5'C aE992r-93 PAQ1a~~~1~ ; HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES: TAP $25,000 $25,000 $72,500 $25,000 TAP-TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER 15,000 15,000 15,000 MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 69,984 69,984 - 97,155 ---------- 79,332 ---------- ---------- 109,984 --------- 109,984 169,655 119,332 CULTURAL ENRICHMENT: VINTON DOGWOOD FESTIVAL 500 500 500 500 ROANOKE SYMPHONY 4,625 2,500 2,500 2,500 ROANOKE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS 0 0 0 CENTER IN THE SQUARE 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 ARTS COUNCIL OF THE BLUE RIDGE 4,625 2,500 2,500 2,500 MILL MOUNTAIN THEATER 0 0 2,621 0 HARRISON MUSEUM OF AFRICAN/AMER CULTURE 0 0 5,000 --------- 0 ---------- ---------- 24,750 ---------- 20,500 33,121 20,500 OTHER: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS 275 275 275 275 TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM 4,590 4,500 4,500 4,500 JULIAN WISE FOUNDATION 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 MILL MOUNTAIN ZOO 0 0 5,000 0 VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND 5,237 5,192 5,585 5,585 CONSTRUCTION SCIENCE BUILDING 21,094 21,093 0 0 ARBORETUM 1,660 0 0 -- 0 ---------- ---------- 37,856 ---------- 36,060 -------- 20,360 15,360 TOTAL $172,590 $166,544 $223,136 $155,192 As Co--I'rrsident cf Brack Creek Elementary Schaai F''TA.. I'm hex~? tt~,day to voi ~e my s!.;p~:~~:~x't :c,~. Raanake County School ' s CuY~.ital ?r~r~x~vem~•nt rl~~.t~ which includes addition=~l classr~aam >pace to Back Cree)~; Eiementar~y. It wasn'± lar; ac~o that. our, school was renovated into the beaut.if;at lear-.-ling ;~nvi.r~anment •~r;,-ak,: it is taday. We are very pr_o,_~d {.•f o;.z~•. r:fw building. However, being the fastest c~r,owing school in tr,e caunty, we are alread~i running o«t of space. 0~_~r ,art & mus i c teacl rers ml_~st share the same roam, ~~~~, camputer 1 ark is located in administrative f_-ffice;~, and enrallment continues to climb. Additional classroom :~pac:e will definitely be needed by 19~' . WC c~;~; :_~;_a rec~_,rr_1 -~~~ si:ppCsr't xng Roanoke County SC'hoal ' s Capi-tal Improvement Plan which includes additional classraom =pa'~? t.;~ ~3ac;~: +"r_ec-}.; E.ezr,~=ntary. Oak Grove Elementary School has long been proud of the tremendous support we have received from the pazents and faculty of our school. This is evidenced with the attendance of those here tonight. We appreciate the opportunity to have our name on the list of those schools that may be on the bond referendum this fall for monies for capital improvements and renovations. While we did not expect this, it is long overdue for us and the other county schools. We realize that money is tight and the budgeting process with limited resources is difficult. Because of this, we aze concerned that if we aze not successful with our inclusion on this bond referendum, we may never see the needed improvements to the school made. As with all of the other PTA units in the Roanoke Valley, we do more than our fair shaze of providing critical resources for the school. Even though PTA units aze not supposed to be fund raising entities, we have found ourselves in this position. County Council PTA completed a survey this past fall to determine the amount of monetary support provided to the schools. They had found that approximately $350,000 was contributed directly to the schools from the PTA units. Also approximately $150,000 came from school clubs and other groups. In total, $500,000, ahalf-million, was made available and put back into the schools. This should be proof of the level of dedication and determination of the people to insure that we aze able to provide a high quality education for our children. This comes at a price though as we aze forced to use the energies of our members to raise these funds. During the fall of each yeaz, we go to our teachers and ask that they give us a list of what they consider to be priority items they require for their classrooms. In the past we have been able to purchase books, computers, vcr's, etc. This yeaz we went to them and brought up our plans for purchasing air conditioning which our classrooms have long needed. The teachers responded by naming air conditioning as their number one priority. We feel this is a mandate from the faculty and pazents of the school as it was voted on during the budget and priority item votes at the General Membership meetings. This will require a significant amount of money from our PTA. If the capital improvement and renovation needs of the schools aze placed on the bond referendum, we aze excited about the prospect of having this money available to the school to provide additional educational resources. We will be able to explore new and exciting educational opportunities. Please allow us this opportunity. Thank you. March 26, 1992 ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1993-94 - 1997 Bond Referendum - November 1992 1. Mason's Cove - classroom addition & renovations $ 500,000. 2. Back Creek - classroom addition 600,000. 3. Cave Spring E1 - library addition & renovations 800,000. 4. Glenvar E1 - renovations 300,000. 5. Herman L. Horn - renovations 300,000. 6. Mountain View - renovations 300,000. 7. Oak Grove - renovations 300,000. 8. Burlington - renovations 300,000. 9. Mount Pleasant - renovations. 300,000. 10. Clearbrook - renovations 100,000. 11. Roland E. Cook - renovations 100,000. $3,900,000. 12. Glenvar High - addition 2,500,000. (Middle school addition - close Ft. Lewis) $6,400,000. Architects/Engineers for completion of plans for these high school projects in order to place them on the Literarv Fund "active" list: 13 Northside High (6$ of $1,500,000) $ 90,000. 14. William Byrd High (6~ of $2,000,000) 120,000. 15. Cave Spring High (6~ of $2,500,000) 150,000. 360,000. $6,760,000. March 26, 1992 LITERARY FUND 1994-95 *1995-96 *1997-98 *1999-2000 Cave Spring Junior $2,500,000. (Plans to be completed in 1992 in order to be placed on Literary Fund "active" list. Funds available in 1994) Northside High - classroom addition and renovations (principal $75,000 - 20 yrs.; interest @ 4$ $60,000 = $135,000 annual debt payment) William Byrd High - science rooms and addition (principal $100,000 - 20 yrs.; interest @ 4~ $80,000 = $180,000 annual debt payment) Cave Spring High - science room addition & renovations (principal $125,000 - 20 yrs.; interest @ 4~ $100,000 = $225,000 annual debt payment) 1,500,000. 2,000,000. 2,500,000. *Plans will need to be completed at least two years in advance of these dates in order to become eligible for the Literary Fund "active" list. New site for Cave Spring High School ? March 26, 1992 ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET Obtain Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) Loans in 1992-93 1. Roof replacements $ 500,000 2. Cave Spring Jr -completion of site improvements 75,000 3. Mason's Cove El -sewerage system 75•~ 650,000 4. Green Valley El -building renovations and kindergarten rooms 1 •~•~ $1,650,000 5. Improvements to meet requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act 50,000 6. Tennis court renovations at each high school 1_ 18$_ 4 ,~_ ALLOCATION OF PRIOR-YEAR BALANCE End-of-Year School Operating Fund Balance from 1990-91 Roof Replacements Architect/engineer fees for Cave Spring Junior renovations (to become eligible for Literary Fund loan in 1994) School bus replacements March 26, 1992 568 717 $100,000 100,000 368.717 568 717 5 M E M O RAN D U M To: Board of Sup rvisors y y r t 7C v From: Elmer C. Hodge Date: April 2, 1992 Subject: Chairman Eddy's March 30 memorandum about 1992-93 budget I would like to try to address Mr. Eddy's memo about the budget in advance so we can make the most productive use of our time at the work session. A. Employee Salaries and Benefits: 1. Three Per Cent Salarv Increases with Cam: I proposed that 3.5 per cent salary increase to match that being proposed by Dr. Wilson for school personnel. My primary concern is that school and County employees be treated the same. Dr. Wilson and I felt that this would be an opportunity for us to do something for the employees during a very difficult year. I would remind the Board that funds for the County salary increase were generated from savings in departmental budgets, through attrition and reduction. I was reminded by the staff on Monday of this week that if funds are not to be used for salary increases, they should go back into their operating budgets. 2. School Board Members' Salarv Increase: School Board decision. 3. Cigarette Tax Revenue: This is an issue that should be discussed with the School Board. I suggest that Chairman Eddy contact the the School Board Chairman for further discussion. B. Revenues• 1. Adult Recreation Program User Fee Increases: I support this concept, but we may need to take more time to review programs and fees. The Parks and Recreation Department has already established and advertised its programs and fee schedules for the summer. Also, John Chambliss advises that this is already being done for those classes of users other than youth athletics and senior citizens. C. Reductions in Operating Expenditures: 1. Position Elimination: This is a personnel issue, and I prefer to discuss it in executive session. The Board has stated publicly that there will be no layoffs. -2- 2. Cellular Phone Elimination: Please be assured that we keep proper controls on usage of cellular phones at this time. I am willing to look at reducing the number, but would ask the Board to consider the impact on productivity. 3. Reduce Recyclable Materials Collection: I agree with the reduction from weekly to semi-monthly collection of these materials. 4. Jail Inmate Labor: I have already spoken with Sheriff Holt and the other staff about using inmate labor whenever possible. We plan to expand their use. However, I oppose reducing the budgets of General Services and Parks and Recreation correspondingly. Both of these departments are presently under considerable stress. Throughout the years, each of you has received complaints about the Condition and availability of our recreation facilities. General Services, out of necessity, has overrun its budget for the last two years. Any savings should certainly stay within these two depart- ments. I would remind the Board once again that department heads have, at my request, reduced their operating budgets in order to generate funds to provide salary increases. 5. Health Care: This is a very good concept and I will ask the EAC to provide recommendations. 6. Reduced Fundinc for Police Department: As reported in the current 1991-92 Annual Fiscal Plan, the loss in 599 funding is approximately $800,000. In addition, there have been reductions in State funds to the Sheriff's Department of another $200,000. However, the County Attorney's office recently contacted the State Compensation Board's Executive Director, who indicated there are no funds available to revert the law enforcement function to the Sheriff's Department in this situation. 7. Mount Pleasant Branch Librarv: Attached is a copy of a report from the Headquarters Library pointing out usage and cost of each of the branches. I support examining County operations and facilities and, if necessary, eliminating those that are not cost effective in delivering services to our citizens. However, it is important to maintain services in the more rural portions of the County. At the present time, it may cost more for Bent Mountain, Catawba, and Mount Pleasant, but I am not in favor of closing any of these branches. I prefer to see if there are alternatives such as getting volunteers to operate the libraries. 8. S ace for yPI & SII: I support this recommendation. The present lease expires June 30, 1993. We will investigate alternatives during the next fiscal year. As a matter of fact, the VA Hospital has notified us that they have space available in their facility. 9. Staff Reductions: I think the staff should be recognized and commended for their efforts. Further reductions will be -3- increasingly more difficult as we redistribute the workload. Staff and I are pleased that you have had no complaints about service levels since shielding the citizens from reductions in service delivery was the number one goal throughout the staff reduction process. However, demands for further service, coupled with additional reductions, will only result in further loss of employee morale, which is already low, as shown by the responses to the employee survey. D. E. F. Capital Acquisitions and Improvements: 1. Vehicle Replacement Policy: I agree. 2. Vehicle Lease-Purchase: I wish that we never had to lease-purchase or finance capital projects through bonds. Out of necessity we have had to. In doing so, we are using a lower level of recurring revenues to pay for recurring expenses rather than using fund balance (non-recurring revenue) to cover recurring expenses. This is a decision for the Board to make. Do we minimize capital purchases this year, or use fund balance, which we had reserved for Dixie Caverns and other unusual expenditures, or do we lease- purchase? 3. Ambulance/Refuse Truck Purchase: See my attached memorandum. 4. Utility Tax Used for Capital Purposes: This has already been done. The half million dollars in additional funds were used this year for capital items. I would remind the Board that we were half a million short because of reduced revenue from personal property taxes. 5. VDOT Revenue Sharinc: I propose doing this through a bond issue. Bond Issue• 1. State Bond Issue: I am sure we will know what the Governor's decision on the State's bond referendum will be by the time we finish on April 28. 2. Specific Breakdown: Because of the current-year staff reductions, I am reluctant to have staff engage in a detailed study of potential bond projects without some reasonable expectation that the Board will approve a referendum. We will have enough informa- tion available at the work session for a go-no go decision to be made. Contributions: 1. Mental Health Services: I agree. 2. CATV Channel: I support the use of this program for economic -4- development, information, and education. Not having received a report from Mr. Musser's Regional Cable Television Committee, we have had to guess what the costs may be. The $55,000 estimate is based upon the allocation of the additional revenue from the increased franchise fee. Perhaps it is better to defer this item until the Regional Committee can complete its study and make a recommendation to the various localities. 3. Convention & Visitors Bureau: The contributions lie with the Board. Herbert requested, and I would like our therapeutics program. 4. TAP: Board decision. 5. CHIP: Board decision. decisions on allocation of $40,000 is more than Bob to see something in return on 6. Julian Wise Museum: Board decision. G. Miscellaneous: 1. Street Liqhts: The civic leagues and County staff have been working on some suggested changes to the street light policy. We will have that for you at our April 28 meeting. They are asking for an additional $10,000, and I want to fund this. ECH/meh Attachments ~~ PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (1991-92) FUNDING TOTAL ROUTE DESC. MAG.DIST. COUNTY STATE COST PRIORITY Rt. 795 Road CS S 17,500 S 17,500 S 35,000 1 Fallowater Widening Lane Additional Funds (90-91 Rev. Shar. Project) Rt. 1506 Construct H S 17,500 S 17,500 S 35,000 2 Eveningwood under-drains Lane & Repair Surf ace Rt. 666 Curve V S 17,500 S 17,500 S 35,000 3 Bandy Widening & Road Plant Mia Rt. 619 Daylight C S 17,500 S 17,500 S 35,000 4 Wildwood Curves & Road Widen Rd. Rt. 695 Curve WH S 17,500 5 17,500 S 35,000 5 Ridgelea Widening & Road Plant Mix Rt. 1542 Plant Mix & C S 7,500 S 7,500 S 15,000 6- Poindexter Drainage Lane Imprv. Rt. 677 Drainage CS S 20,000 S 20,000 S 40,000 7 Willow Imprv. & Branch Prime & Road Seal 1 ~-3 PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (151-92) FUNDING TOTAL ROUTE DESC. MAG.DIST. COUNTY STATE. COST PRIORITY Rt. 615 Daylight CS S 35,000 S 35,OC~ S 70,000 8 Starlight curves, Lane Prime ~ Seal Rt. 690 Spot WH $ 2,500 S 2, 5C~ S 5,000 9 Poage PatcLing & Valley Repair Road Rt. 889 Surface WH S 5,000 S 5, OG: S 10,000 10 Mili Creek Trea~ent Road Rt. 780 Draicage C $ 65,000 S 65, OC~: S130,000 11 Cove Road Impr~. Rt. 1851 Plan: ra x H S 7,740 S 7, 74 S 15,480 12 Commander Fr. Rt. 11 Drive To E.S.M. Rt. 1843 Plan: l~ix H S 13,360 S 13, 3f? S 26,720 13 Darby Road Fr. Rt. 1851 To E.S.M. - - -- Rt. 1844 Plan; rix H S 6,780 S 6, 7E: S 13,560 14 Abney Road Fr. Rt. 11 To E.S.M. Rt. 1006 Plan: t+sx V S 1, 950 S 1, 95:: S 3, 900 15 Stonebridge Fr. Rt. Circle 1007 to cul-de-sac 2 ~_3 PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (1991-92) FUNDING TOTAL ROUTE DESC. MAG.DIST. COUNTY STATE COST PRIORITY Rt. 1007 Plant Mix V S 7,920 S 7,920 S 15,840 15 Stonebridge Fr. Int. Drive Rt. 24 to Rt. 1009 Rt. 651 Plant Mix V Mountain Fr. Rt. View Road 24 to Rt. 1078 Rt. 659 Plant Mix V Mayfield Fr. Rt. 116 Drive to Rt. 666 Rt. 838 Plant Mix H Thornrose Fr. Rt. 1851 Road To Rt. 890 Rt. 1850 Plant Mix H Palmyra Fr. Rt. 1843 Road To Rt. 838 Rt. 1849 Plant Mix H Anchor Fr. Rt. 1851 Drive To Rt. 838 Rt. 1676 Plant Mix WH Ayrshire Fr. Rt. Drive 1516 to .19 Mi. E. Rt. 1652 S 20,000 $ 20,000 S 40,000 I7 S 15,000 S 15,000 S 30,000 I8 S 14,715 S 14,715 $ 29,430 19 S 3,100 S 3,100 $ 6,200 20 S 4,400 S 4,400 S 8,800 21 S 10,250 S 10,250 $ 20,500 22 3 • ". ~-3 PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (1991-92) ROUTE DESC. MAG.DIST. FUNDING COUNTY STATE TOTAL COST PRIORITY Rt. 1653 Plant Mix WH S 13,000 S 13,000 S 26,000 23 Galloway Fr. .13 Drive Mi. E. Rt. 1652 to Rt. 702 Rt. 1008 Plant Mix V S 5,280 S 5,280 S 10,560 29 Echo Drive Fr. Rt. 1007 to Rt. 1009 Rt. 1009 Plant Mix V S 5,650 S 5,650 $ 11,300 25 Robindale Fr. Rt. Drive 1008 to D.E. Rt. 1058 Plant Mix V S 1,200 S 1,200 $ 2,400 26 Stoneacres Fr. Rt. Drive 1009 to cul-de-sac (East) Rt: 1058 Plant Mix V S 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 9,000 27 Stoneacres Fr. Rt. Drive 1009 to cul-de-sac (k'est) Rt. 1848 Plant Mix H S 5,545 S 5,545 S 11,090 28 Fairhurst Fr. Rt. 1843 Drive To E.S.M. Rt. 1847 Plant Mix H S 3,435 S 3,435 S 6,870 29 Fenwick Fr. Rt. 838 Drive To Rt. 1843 4 J7-3 PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (1991-92) FUNDING TOTAL ROUTE DESC. MAG.DIST. COUNTY STATE COST F=:ORITY Rt. 839 Plant Mia H Malvern Fr. Rt. 1847 Road To Rt. 840 Rt. 1845 Plant Mia H Littleton Fr. Rt. 838 Road To Rt. 1844 Rt. 837 Plant Mia H Raymond Fr. Rt. 839 Avenue To E.S.M. Rt. 740 Plant Mia C Carvins Fr. Int. Cove Rt. 912 Road to 1.5 Mi. E. of Int. Rt. 1688 Plant Mia WH Longhorn Fr.Rt. Road 1687 to .23 Mi. W. Rt. 1689 Rt. 1529 Plant Mia WH Galloway Fr. Rt. Circle 1653 to .07 Mi. S. Rt. 1653 S 8,325 S 8,325 $ 16,650 30 S 5,620 S 5,620 S 11,240 31 S 2,115 S 2,115 S 4,230 32 S 24,000 S 24,000 S 48,000 33 S 7,500 S 7,500 S 15,000 34 S 2,000 S 2,000 S 4,000 35 5 ~-3 PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING PROJECTS (1991-92) ROUTE DESC. Rt. 1517 Plant Mix Hereford Fr. Rt. Road 702 To Rt. 1358 MAG.DIST. FUNDING TOTAL COUNTY STATE COST PRIORITY ~ S 4,000 5 4,000 S 8,000 36 Rt. 1031 Plant Mix V Deer Run Fr. Rt. 1033 Drive to Rt. 1033 Rt. 1033 Plant Mix V Chestnut Fr. Rt. 1033 Mtn. Drive to 2nd Int. Y/Rt. 1031 Rt. 840 Plant Mix H Nelms Lane Fr. Rt. 838 To Rt. 839 TOTAL S 7,000 5 7,000 S 14,000 37 S 4,000 $ 4,000 5 8,000 38 S 1,585 5 1,585 S 3,170 39 $436,470 5436,470 $864,940 6 Q ~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ; F AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ;~ CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~~~~~; G'r- ~~ ~E~.~-~' ~v~~~~'~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO TIC CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE »;. ~~~`~ ~~ ~oC ~ ~ ~~-- ~s -~ ~-~ ~-, _ ~~pC ~ ~ sI 47 ~Or°_" I t ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' t ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 1 ~ ' ' ' , ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' t ' ' t 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 t ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. = APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE ~! CITIZENS COMMENTS r,"' SUBJECT: I L.~' ~ ri_c~s ~- ~'' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must 6e directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE ,--- ~ ~~ ~ ~`" ~ 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~s~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. _____ APPEAI~:ANCE REQUEST FOR ~UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~-~ G-~T" ._ ~%~/~ /~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 3 NAME r ~ A- ~/V /~ ~/~S ADDRESS ~ 5.3~ ~9-f3 ~~-r[0 ~~ ~ ~~~~ PHONE ,~ ~ Z - ~-~/_~~~ I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 -:: II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS ~~ ~ ,, ~? SUBJECT: ~~~~~~ (~' _ ~~~~l~v~ ~:~ j~~~~~-~ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~~~~=~~~~ 5 ~ <~ 7 -~ ~ ~ ~~:-~ ~.~.-, ADDRESS ~~~~ ~ :~~: <<,~--~ ~%~ ~~' PHONE - (, ~ ~r~~ 7 7 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I1111111111111111l111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC FIEARING -ORDINANCE ~/ CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: S~:hao~ C~r~if~( ~~imrv,ie~rer~S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WIN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vr~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~ h1 ~ h ~ rsa ADDRESS ca v S ..~ ul PHONE ~~ q -~v ~ ~ ~ II111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE ~LCITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: anC~~- .~ ~)c,h~~ C.'c~ r~-tc~~ --~_ ~rn ~G~L~'~~.r1rt ~1- tcc-r I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~ I,tSC',~r1 ~-,.urYt~~c~ n ADDRESS . (~ t~ l C~;a~ ~,b~-~,-~k 1~-.. ~ S c.,.~ PHONE _~ `~ ~--i - ~~ 31 Iillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllll 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may pe entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~D 1~ ~ ~~~-~-tJ o y ,ti-~-. - s~,t-~o ~ ~ s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS Z3~~ STA~~.~~v-~, Gtz.c.,L~ Z`-~~~~ PHONE ~ ~~ - S 3 S c~ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCECITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ` ~ ~ ~, ~~ a~ r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~~ f~ ~ d ~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vc~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR ,PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: 1 ~4 ~irr ~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T'I~ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIIE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME J ,,~C ~ ~!~ ADDRESS ~. ~ . ~; ~ ~, S~ ~ ~-,~ , ~-~. r v)k= PHONE ,~ ~ ~,- ,~.-~~:; ~~~~ 11111111111111111111111111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111