HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/23/1992 - Regular~ ROAN ~.
F
a
ti p
Z
a
183
C~aix~t~ .~# ~.~r~x~n~
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
JUNE 23, 1992
rffwrr a' ns~ ~ ~
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. There will be an
Audit Committee Meeting at 2:30 p.m.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M.
2. Invocation: Father Kenneth Stofft
Our Lady of Nazareth
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
LBE ADDED ITEM AT END OF EVENING SESSION -APPROVAL OF
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT
COMII~IISSION
LBE ADDED DISCUSSION OF ROANOKE CITY WATER BII.L TO
EXECUTIVE SESSION
1
® Recycled paper
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Introduction of Jeffrey A. Echols, Resident Engineer,
Salem Residency, Virginia Department of Transportation.
IlVTRODUCED BY ECH
2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of August 7 - 9, 1992,
as "The Battle of South Salem".
R-62392-1
FM MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
ACCEPTED BY BRUCE MAYER, COMMANDER, 2ND VIRGIlVIA
CAVALRY COMPANY, INC. AND VIC MIDDLEKAUFF
D. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
1. Recognition of Employees for Their Years of Services to
Roanoke County.
PRESENTED BY DKC, ECH, AND LBE
2. Reception Honoring Employees Who Received Service
Awards.
RECESS AT 3:35 P.M FOR 15 MINN~UTE RECESS
E. BRIEFINGS
1. Spring Hollow Reservoir
PRESENTED BY CLIFF CRAIG, AND JOHN BRADSHAW, HSMM
2
2. Smith Gap Landfill
PRESENTED BY TOHN HUBBARD, CEO, RVRA
BOARD DIRECTED THAT LBE, PMM, ECH CONTACT ROANOKE CITY
CONCERNING URGENCY TO APPROVE METHOD TO SELL BONDS
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Adoption of Goals and Policies for Fiscal Year
1992-93. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator)
A-62392-2
BI,~T MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
2. Request for Appropriation of 1990-91 School Surplus.
(Diane Hyatt, Finance Director)
A-62392-3
BI.LT MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
3. Approval of Change Order Procedure for Spring Hollow
Reservoir. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director)
A-62392-4
EGK MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
NONE
3
H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
B T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC
HEARING FOR TULY 28, 1992
URC
1. Ordinance to Rezone .9 Acre from M-2 to R-1 to Allow
Continuation and Expansion of an Existing Residential
Use, Located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Martha C. Chinault.
J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
NONE
K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
NONE
L APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals
BIiT NOMINATED CARLTON WRIGHT FOR ANOTHER FIVE-YEAR
TERM
2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission
3. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
4
4. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board
5. Social Services Board
HCN NOMINATED BETTY TO ANTHONY FOR ANOTHER FOUR-YEAR
TERM
M. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WII..L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
R-62392-5
B T MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
1. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Duxbury Court.
A-62392-S.a
2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees for Action
Against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
A-62392-5.b
3. Donation of Drainage Easements in Connection with the
Hawley Drive Drainage Project.
A-62392-S.c
4. Donation of Easements in Connection with the
Development of Canterbury Park, Section 9.
s
A-62392-5.d
5. Resolution of Appreciation to Paul G. Black for his
Services on the Roanoke County School Board.
R-62392-5.e
N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR NICKENS: (1) CONIlVIENTED ON REQUEST
FROM CITIZEN CONCERNING DISCOUNTING OF PERSONAL
PROPERTY TAXES FOR QUALIFYING VETERANS PER G.A.
AMENDMENT 1991. ASKED PMM TO REVIEW FOR LAW AND RWC
FOR FISCAL IlViPACT OF Il1~'LEMENTATION. (2) DISCUSSED MEMO
FROM SPENCER WATTS, LIB. DIR., CONCERNING LIBRARY
SERVICES.
SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: (1) ANNOUNCED CITY OF
ROANOKE APPROVED ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT
COMII~IISSION BUDGET. (2) ADVISED THAT BZA FEELS IT NEEDS
SOME FLEXIBILITY IN APPROACHING PROBLEMS. BOARD
CONSENSUS TO HOLD WORK SESSION WITH BZA ON 7/14/92.
SUPERVISOR KOHINKE: (1) FOUND RECENT TOUR OF
RESERVOIR VERY INFORMATIVE. (2) REQUESTED DATES FOR
BOARD RETREAT. ECH WII.L ADVISE BOARD OF TENTATIVE
DATES.
SUPERVISOR EDDY: ~1.,) ADVISED HE WILL BE AT VA
TECH CENTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE, VA COUNTY BOARD
C INSTITUTE, ON 7/15/92 IN CHARLOTTESVII.LE. ASKED
FOR SUGGESTIONS OR IDEAS TO TAKE TO MEETING.
O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMU1vICATIONS
NONE
P. REPORTS
B T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM
5
UW
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of May 31,
1992
5. Enforcement of Weed Ordinance
6. 1991 Water Projects
7. Smith Gap Landfill
Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel and
briefings by staff members, pertaining to actual or probable
litigation, (a) concerning Dixie Caverns and Roanoke Electric
Steel and (b) Roanoke City Water Bill.
FM MOTION AT 5:25 P.M.
URC
R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
R-62392-6
BI,~T MOTION TO APPROVE AT 7:03 P.M.
URC
EVENING SESSION
S. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Request for a Special Exception Permit from Reinhold
Arnold Winnemuth to Operate a Barber Shop in an M-1
Zoning District, 5221-A Starkey Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (Terry Harrington, Planning and
Zoning Director)
A-62392-7
FM MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT
URC
2. Request for Resolution of Intent to Enter Upon Certain
Properties (Roger E. and Sharon M. Vest) and Take
Certain Rights-of--Way in Connection with Development of
the Forest Edge Water System. (Paul M. Mahoney, County
Attorney) (COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HAS
DEFERRED THIS ITEM UNTIL A LATER DATE.)
DEFERRED UNTIL A LATER DATE
PUBLIC HEARING WAS NOT HELD
T. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by the Repeal
of Same and by Adopting and Reenacting a New Zoning
Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning
Director)
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND HOLD 2ND
READING AND PUBLIC HEARING ON 8/25/92
URC
8
WORK SESSION SET FOR 7/14/92
RICHARD S. + , SEC, RRHBA, PRESENTED ADDITIONAL
CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED
U. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCES
1. An ordinance to rezone 24.090 acres from M-2 to M-3 to
construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, located
on the south side of Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Asphalt
Paving Company. (Terry Harrington, Planning and
Zoning Director) (COr~TIIVUED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 22,
1992)
COr~'1'INUED UNTIL 9-22-92 AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER
2. An Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by
amending Section 12-8, Adoption of State Law, of Article I
of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke
County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
0-62392-8
FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
3. An Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.615 Acres from
B-1 and R-1 to B-2 to Operate a New Car Dealership
Located at the Corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer
Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the
Petition of Valley Motorsport. (Terry Harrington,
Planning and Zoning Director)
0-62392-9
BLT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
9
4. An Ordinance to Rezone 0.893 Acre from B-1 and B-2 to
B-2 to Operate a Convenience Store with Gas Dispenser,
Located at 3202 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial
District, Upon the Petition of Workman Oil Company.
(Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director)
0-62392-10
EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
V. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COlNIlVIUlVICATIONS
1. T. CARTER, 4435 CORDELL DRIVE, SPOKE
CONCERNING N&S RAILROAD - RIGHT OF EMINENT
DOMAIN
ECH TO ~ ~ SITUATION WITH TOHN HUBBARD
2. CHRISTINE ELLIOTT~ 108 TTH STREET. VIlVTON.
REPRESENTING MIDWAY CO , REQUESTED
HELP WITH FLOODING SITUATION
BOARD SUGGESTED THAT ECH MEET WITH TOWN OF VIIVTON
AND REPORT PROGRESS TO CITIZENS
3. PAT SCOTT, ON BEHALF OF HER MOTHER, 2240
DUNKIRK AVENUE, REQUESTED REGIONAL HELP WITH
FLOODING AND INVESTIGATION OF BUILDING PERMITS
BY ROANOKE CITY IN FLOOD PLAIN
HCN REOUESTED THAT STAFF DETERMINE SITUATION
CONCERNING BUILDING PERMITS
W. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Approval of Capital Expense for Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission. (Elmer Hodge, County
10
Administrator)
R-62392-11
HCN MOTION TO TABLE - WITfIDRAWN
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE
URC
X. ADJOURNMENT
B T MOTION AT 8:50 P.M. - UW
is
~ ~ pOAN ,~.
F
a
~ ~ p
Z
~ a
1838
C~.~uz~#g ~~ ~..o~~x~.o ~.e
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
JUNE 23, 1992
,gnrr o~ nr euE x~
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. There will be an
Audit Committee Meeting at 2:30 p.m.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: Father Kenneth Stofft
Our Lady of Nazareth
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
i
® Reoydad P~-
1. Introduction of Jeffrey A. Echols, Resident Engineer,
Salem Residency, Virginia Department of Transportation.
2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of August 7 - 9, 1992,
as "The Battle of South Salem".
D. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
1. Recognition of Employees for Their Years of Services to
Roanoke County.
2. Reception Honoring Employees Who Received Service
Awards.
E. BRIEFINGS
1. Spring Hollow Reservoir
Z. Smith Gap Landfill
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Adoption of Goals and Policies for Fiscal Year
1992-93. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator)
2. Request for Appropriation of 1990-91 School Surplus.
(Diane Hyatt, Finance Director)
3. Approval of Change Order Procedure for Spring Hollow
Reservoir. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director)
G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
2
H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
1. Ordinance to Rezone .9 Acre from M-2 to R-1 to Allow
Continuation and Expansion of an Existing Residential
Use, Located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Martha C. Chinault.
J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
L. APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals
2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission
3. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
4. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board
5. Social Services Board
M. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
3
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Duxbury Court.
2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees for Action
Against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
3. Donation of Drainage Easements in Connection with the
Hawley Drive Drainage Project.
4. Donation of Easements in Connection with the
Development of Canterbury Park, Section 9.
5. Resolution of Appreciation to Paul G. Black for his
Services on the Roanoke County School Board.
N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
O. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND CO1bIlVIUIVICATIONS
P. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4
4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of May 31,
1992
5. Enforcement of Weed Ordinance
6. 1991 Water Projects
7. Smith Gap Landfill
Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel and
briefings by staff members, pertaining to actual or probable
litigation, concerning Dixie Caverns and Roanoke Electric Steel.
R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
EVENING SESSION
S. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Request for a Special Exception Permit from Reinhold
Arnold Winnemuth to Operate a Barber Shop in an M-1
Zoning District, 5221-A Starkey Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (Terry Harrington, Planning and
Zoning Director)
2. Request for Resolution of Intent to Enter Upon Certain
Properties (Roger E. and Sharon M. Vest) and Take
Certain Rights-of--Way in Connection with Development of
the Forest Edge Water System. (Paul M. Mahoney, County
Attorney) (COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HAS
DEFERRED THIS ITEM UNTIL A LATER DATE.)
s
T.
U.
V.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by the Repeal
of Same and by Adopting and Reenacting a New Zoning
Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning
Director)
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCES
1. An ordinance to rezone 24.090 acres from M-2 to M-3 to
construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, located
on the south side of Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring
Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Asphalt
Paving Company. (Terry Harrington, Planning and
Zoning Director) (CON'T'INUED UN1~. SEPTEMBER 22,
1992)
2. An Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by
amending Section 12-8, Adoption of State Law, of Article I
of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke
County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
3. An Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.615 Acres from
B-1 and R-1 to B-2 to Operate a New Car Dealership
Located at the Corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer
Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the
Petition of Valley Motorsport. (Terry Harrington,
Planning and Zoning Director)
4. An Ordinance to Rezone 0.893 Acre from B-1 and B-2 to
B-2 to Operate a Convenience Store with Gas Dispenser,
Located at 3202 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial
District, Upon the Petition of Workman Oil Company.
(Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director)
CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COIV~IlVIUNICATIONS
W. ADJOURNMENT
6
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~ "
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of Jeffrey A. Echols, Resident
Engineer, Salem Residency, Virginia Department
of Transportation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Echols has been promoted to the position previously occupied by
Fred Altizer. He will be moving to the Roanoke area from
Charlottesville. Since he will be working with each of you in your
districts, I have arranged this time for him to appear before the
Board and meet you.
After he has moved to this area and is more familiar with Roanoke
County, you may wish to schedule time with him to see the road
needs in your district.
Appro ed by,
~,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
.•-r
"`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE BOUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1992
RESOLUTION 62392-1 DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF AUGUST 7 - 9, 1992
AS ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM~~
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, almost exactly one hundred and
twenty-eight years ago today, Confederate forces, under the
leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under
the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle
at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and
419 in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near
the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in
Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engage-
ment; and
WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the
Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 8 and 9, 1992, there will be a re-
enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in
Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the weekend of August 7-9,
1992 as ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM~~, and extends its best wishes
for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
s
A COPY TESTE:
~`.~.Gc.rP~CC~.J
Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
L~ ,,~
AT A REGULAR MEETING Off' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1992
RESOLUTION DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF AUGUST 7 - 9, 1992
AS "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM"
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, almost exactly one hundred and
twenty-eight years ago today, Confederate forces, under the
leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under
the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle
at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and
419 in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near
the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in
Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engage-
ment; and
WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the
Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 8 and 9, 1992, there will be a re-
enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in
Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the weekend of August 7-9,
1992 as "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM', and extends its best wishes
for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event.
ACTION NUMBER #
ITEM NUMBER # ,~ 1 •~' .,~._.,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Service Award Presentations
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The Board of Supervisors recognizes employees for their years of
service to the County. Employees are recognized for five years of
service and successive five-year intervals. Employees are
presented with a certificate of recognition at the Board of
Supervisors' meeting and may select a service pin or other
appropriate award through the Department of Human Resources
following the ceremony.
The list of 1991 service award recipients is attached for the
presentation of service certificates. Following the presentation,
a reception will be held to honor service award recipients and
their families. We congratulate these dedicated employees.
SUBMITTED BY:
D. K. Cook
Director of Human Resources
ACTION
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) Kohinke
Referred ( ) Nickens
To Minnix
VOTE
No Yes Abs
~~~
1991 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDB
THIRTY FIVE YEARS SERVICE
Mary E. Hicks
THIRTY YEARS SERVICE
Robert S. Lamb
County Administrator
General Services
TWENTY FIVE YEARS SERVICE (Quarter Century Plaque)
Joan A. Nelson
TWENTY YEARS SERVICE
Ernest R. Miller, Jr.
Charles L. Paitsel
Garland H. Rucker
Edward E. Burford
Linda S. Hogan
FIFTEEN YEARS SERVICE
Michael J. Simpson
Stephen P. Huff
Sherman A. Cable
Sarah S. Alls
Freddie L. Cooper,
R. Wayne Compton
Edna F. Lawson
Phillip W. Carper
John W. Birckhead
Dallas W. Parrish
William R. Hammond,
Fannie S. Bolden
Betsy B. Dennis
Darlene H. Adams
Billy H. McDaniel
Vickie G. McCorkle
Charles R. Hart
Mason W. Ferris
Jr.
Jr.
Social Services
General Services
General Services
General Services
General Services
Police Department
Sheriff's Office
Sheriff's Office
General Services
Finance Department
Library
Commissioner of Revenue
Management Information Sys
Parks & Recreation
Real Estate Assessment
General Services
Social Services
Library
Parks & Recreation
Procurement
General Services
Sheriff's Office
Sheriff's Office
Utility Department
1991 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
THIRTY FIVE YEARS SERVICE
Mary E. Hicks
THIRTY YEARS SERVICE
Robert S. Lamb
County Administrator
General Services
TWENTY FIVE YEARS SERVICE (Quarter Century Plaque)
Joan A. Nelson
TWENTY YEARS SERVICE
Ernest R. Miller, Jr.
Charles L. Paitsel
Garland H. Rucker
Edward E. Burford
Linda S. Hogan
FIFTEEN YEARS SERVICE
Michael J. Simpson
Stephen P. Huff
Sherman A. Cable
Sarah S. Alls
Freddie L. Cooper,
R. Wayne Compton
Edna F. Lawson
Phillip W. Carper
John W. Birckhead
Dallas W. Parrish
William R. Hammond,
Fannie S. Bolden
Betsy B. Dennis
Darlene H. Adams
Billy H. McDaniel
Vickie G. McCorkle
Charles R. Hart
Mason W. Ferris
Jr.
Jr.
Social Services
General Services
General Services
General Services
General Services
Police Department
Sheriff's Office
Sheriff's Office
General Services
Finance Department
Library
Commissioner of Revenue
Management Information Sys
Parks & Recreation
Real Estate Assessment
General Services
Social Services
Library
Parks & Recreation
Procurement
General Services
Sheriff's Office
Sheriff's Office
Utility Department
- 3 -
FIVE YEARS SERVICE (cont)
Troy A. Gray, Jr.
William Thorne
Dean A. Wood
Richard A. Dulaney
Harry E. Karnes
Joseph E. Howell
Carl L. Booth
Steven R. Martin
Carolyn B. Wagner
Sherlyn A. Matz
John R. Frank, Jr.
Daniel W. Foster
Wayne A. Kingery, Jr.
David M. Hafey
William D. Duff
Joey T. Stump
David W. Hogan
Jeffrey A. Lawson
Mark C. Fuller
Thomas J. Bier
Carolyn W. Puryear
Claude C. Pullen III
Vincent K. Copenhaver
Cecil D. Showalter
Sharon L. Reynolds
Brian K. Cook
Larry A. Boone
Diana L. Rosapepe
Deborah R. Stevens
Claire M. Alasio
R. Fay Mahone
Michael A. Metz
Shirlee E. Hill
Fire & Rescue
Parks & Recreation
Utility Department
Utility Department
Utility Department
Parks & Recreation
Sheriff's Office
Sheriff's Office
Resource Authority
Sheriff's Office
Utility Department
Utility Department
Utility Department
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue
Police Department
Fire & Rescue
Commissioner of Revenue
Fire & Rescue
Finance Department
Refuse Section
Police Department
Utility Department
Utility Department
Library
Social Services
Youth Haven II
Circuit Court
Youth Haven II
Refuse Section
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on Spring Hollow Reservoir
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside for a briefing on the progress of the
Spring Hollow Reservoir.
Utility Director Cliff Craig, and representatives from Hayes, Seay,
Mattern & Mattern will be present.
Approved by,
/'~'
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on Smith Gap Landfill
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This time has been set aside for a briefing on the progress of the
Smith Gap Landfill.
John Hubbard, Chief Executive Officer of the Roanoke Valley
Resource Authority and John Olver, Consultant, will be present.
Approved by,
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
ACTION NO. A-62392-2
ITEM NUMBER
~~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Adoption of Goals and Policies for
the County of Roanoke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the June 9, 1992, Board of Supervisors Meeting, a list of
proposed goals and policies was presented and discussed. Staff was
asked to make several changes to the list and to bring it back to
the Board at this meeting. These changes have been incorporated
and the document is now presented for your consideration.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the Statement of Goals and
Policies for the County of Roanoke effective July 1, 1992.
~~
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) motion to adopt Eddy x
Johnson x
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred ( ) x
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens x
cc: File
Assistant County Administrators
Department Heads
W~
STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES
FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
GOALS
Goals reflect the continuation, improvement or expansion of
activities or the delivery of services. Goals are intended to
provide a focus for the County's personnel, boards and commissions
as they make the daily decisions that affect their individual
actions and the actions of their departments. County personnel
should maintain a close familiarity with these goals and endeavor
to perform in a manner that is consistent with and supportive of
them within the constraints of funds available.
EDUCATION, CULTURAL ENRICHMENT AND RECREATION
Schools - Provide the highest quality public school system.
Libraries - Help meet the educational, informational and
recreational needs of the citizens of the County. Emphasize
collection development to effectively build resources and
cooperate with other valley libraries to provided greater
access to area materials.
Parks and Recreation - Provide park and recreational
facilities as appropriate for the needs and desires of County
citizens with emphasis on programs for youth. Provide a
reasonable level of services for senior citizens. Avoid
competition with commercial adult service providers.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Law Enforcement - Provide a professional law enforcement
service that achieves good rates of crime deterrence,
apprehension and conviction, and achieves a high level of
public safety consistent with the urban/rural character of the
County.
Fire and Rescue - Maintain a high level of public fire and
rescue service utilizing a combination of career and volunteer
personnel. Provide a level of quality in facilities,
equipment and benefits that will enhance the safety,
effectiveness and spirit of the fire and rescue organizations.
~-
2
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Road System - Work with state agencies to provide a safe and
convenient system of public roads and highways. Utilize the
state revenue sharing program for road construction as
economic conditions permit.
Utilities - Expand and improve public water and sewer
facilities consistent with residential and commercial needs
recognizing the economies of promoting growth near existing
developed areas.
ENVIRONMENT
Solid Waste Disposal - Provide a high level of consistency,
efficiency and service orientation in the collection and
disposal of solid wastes.
Recyclina - Emphasize recycling and source reduction of waste
by residents and commercial organizations. Discourage illegal
dumping.
POLICIES
Policies support goals. They represent definite courses or
methods of action selected from among alternatives and are intended
to guide and determine present and future decisions. The policies
of a local government are a reflection of its relations with others
-- its attitudes and behavior toward its citizens and the public
in general.
ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
Economic Development - Encourage desirable new businesses and
industries to locate in the Roanoke area recognizing the
limited quantity of developable land and the need to apportion
its use for optimum benefits. Encourage existing business and
industries to remain and expand. Promote the growth of
regional tourism.
Land Use - Provide a professional land use policy that
achieves a reasonable balance between the interests of
industrial, commercial, single-family and multi-family
residential development, consistent with community needs.
Promote a range of housing suitable for all income groups.
Comprehensive Plan - Develop a concise, workable comprehensive
plan and be consistent in is implementation.
t
3
COMMUNITY SPIRIT AND COMMUNICATIONS
Regional Cooperation - Promote cooperation with local
governments, businesses and organizations as appropriate and
necessary to enhance the quality of life in Roanoke County and
the Roanoke Valley.
Communications - Develop effective two-way communications
between all segments of County government and its citizens.
FISCAL POLICIES
Assessments - Provide fair and equitable property assessments,
consistent with state law.
Tax Rates - Set tax rates at the minimum level necessary to
fund efficient and effective services for citizens.
Types of Taxes - Provide a broad range of local taxes to
spread the tax burden among all county residents.
Reserves - Develop sufficient fund reserves to minimize short-
term borrowing and to provide a safety net for times of
economic adversity.
Recurring and Non-recurring Expenditures - Use bond issues
only for non-recurring large capital outlay projects. Use
current revenues for recurring replacement and maintenance
expenses.
,~
ACTION NO.
A-62392-3
.~. ,,,
ITEM NUMBER ~;~..~..
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of 1990-1991 School Surplus
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: y~_ a~~"`'~"~`~'~
BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1991, the staff reported that the
schools had a surplus of $592,429 available as a result of
expenditures being less than budget for the fiscal year ended June
30, 1991. At the time, the School's had some concern over the
1991-1992 revenue picture because of the sluggish economy;
therefore the money was temporarily reserved. Funds have been
appropriated as needed:
Original Surplus $592,429
Stoplight - School portion (12,500)
School bus for handicapped (14,500)
School buses (74,000)
X491,429
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County Schools is anticipating a
surplus for the 1991-1992 fiscal year, and would like to
appropriate the balance of the 1990-1991 surplus at this time. On
June 9, 1992 the School Board adopted the attached resolution
requesting that the remaining balance from the 1990-1991 fiscal
year be appropriated as follows:
Buses $246,429
Roof repairs 100,000
Cave Spring Jr. architectural 145,000
491 429
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends appropriating the remaining
$491,429 from the 1990-1991 fiscal year as requested by the School
Board.
1
F_ ,~
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
~ ~ ~ in,r,.J ~ e
~~'~-~'-
Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge, r
Director of Finance County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson
Denied ( ) motion to approve Eddy x
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred ( ) Johnson x
To Minnix x
Nickens _ x
1
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
2
r-~
FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING
IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON JUNE 9, 1992 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ALLOCATION OF THE 1990-91
END-OF-YEAR SCHOOL OPERATING FUND BALANCE
WHEREAS, the 1990-91 end-of-year School Operating Fund
balance of $491,429 is currently in the Bus Fund, and
WHEREAS, these funds will be expended during the 1992-93
school year as budgeted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board
of Roanoke County, on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded,
requests the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to allocate the
1990-91 end-of-year School Operating Fund balance as follows:
1. Bus Fund $246,429.
2. Roof replacements $100,000.
3. Architect/engineer fees for
Cave Spring Junior renovations $145,000
Adopted on the following recorded vote:
AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S.
Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas
NAYS: None
TESTE: i /
i~/ ~-~-- C l e r k
,,..c
ACTION NO. A-62392-4
ITEM NUMBER r °`~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Change Order Approval for Spring Hollow
Reservoir Construction
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ -~~
BACKGROUND•
The Board of Supervisors awarded the contract to construct the
Spring Hollow Reservoir to PCL Civil Contractors, Inc. and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the Contract.
During the past six months, there have been several change orders
which did not affect the funding of the project. These were
approved by the Utility Director.
SUMMARY:
In order to provide timely response to change order requests, a
policy needs to be adopted to establish change order approval
authority on behalf of the County.
The County Attorney, Procurement Director, and Utility Director
have developed the following proposed policy for approval authority
on change orders for the Spring Hollow-Reservoir Construction:
1. No change order will increase the total project budget without
prior appropriation by the Board.
2. All change orders must initially be approved by Hayes, Seay,
Mattern & Mattern, Consultant Engineer, and Roanoke County
Utility Director for engineering adequacy.
3. All change orders approved by the County will be included in
the monthly project report.
4. For change orders that result in a credit or no additional
cost to the owners, the Procurement Director is authorized to
sign the change order on behalf of the County.
r 4
~^^~ r°;
1.,.., «,. +i
1 ~,}
5. For change orders that require transfers from within the
budget or from the contingency account in an amount of 0.25
or less of the contract price, the Procurement Director is
authorized to sign the change order on behalf of the County.
6. For change orders that require transfers from within the
budget or from the contingency account in an amount greater
than 0.25 but less than 1% of the contract price, the County
Administrator is authorized to sign the change order on behalf
of the County.
7. For change orders that require transfers from within the
budget or from the contingency account of 1% of the contract
price or greater, the Board of Supervisors would authorize
approval on an individual change order basis.
ALTERNATIVES•
Alternative No. 1. The Board of Supervisors would adopt the above
seven items as the policy for approving change
orders for the Spring Hollow Reservoir
Project .
Alternative No. 2. The Board of Supervisors would adopt the above
seven items with different amounts of
percentages as the policy for approving change
orders for the Spring Hollow Reservoir
Project .
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt Alternative No. 1.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by,
Cli rd Craig, E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved (~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke
motion to approve Alternative
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Minnix x
Nickens x
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. ~""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and
First Reading for
Rezoning Ordinances
Consent Agenda
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by
adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items.
The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the
substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather
approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County
Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second
reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing
on these ordinances is scheduled for July 28, 1992.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1. An ordinance to rezone .9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to allow
continuation and expansion of an existing residential use,
located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District,
upon the petition of Martha C. Chinault.
MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE
CLERKS OFFICE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
(1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of
these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling
the second reading and public hearing for July 28, 1992.
r "~
R
(2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is,
approved and concurred in as to each item separately set
forth as Item 1, inclusive, and that the Clerk is
authorized and directed where required by law to set
forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation
for any such item pursuant to this action.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
1
/~'~-~ 'a SCE Date Rec.: ~1 a
~~~ Received By:
~i~~~ CAGp (~.~^~~ Case No.:
- ~ ~ Ord. No.
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name:
.~
~~~ ~ ~
Address : ~1/~ ~/~~y~l/~.~ ~/ L1l1 ~ ~`~'
f
~~~~-OS N~-~
~'d~~
2. Applicant's Name: J,O.~~ Phone:
Address:
3. Location of Property: ~~1~
~~
Tax Map Number (s) : (-{ D , p y - ~ - ~ ~,
4. Magisterial District: 1- e ,
5. Size of Property: * ~ ,~ ~ .
6. Existing Zoning:~=
Existing Land Use: (Z~~~,c~~l~~q ( - S +tic.: c,~ ~,y~,~_~
7. Proposed Zoning: ~~-
Proposed Land Use: (~~Si c~~ti}-!- ~ ~ - 5,,~;~,, ~z ~,a~,1,~~/ -- ~K(~,N.~ l~S~.
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 1 JSc ~~ (~ ~;~,~,~ ~~
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: --
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
~~,~ ~ A Letter of Application _ Concept Plan
~~ ~_ Metes and Bounds Description ,/ List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map
F~ ~ ~ c~ Application Fee _~.)y Written Proffers
~A {~.~~;~ ~ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
~~R
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner' sA-gye~ nt : /~
signature~~'/«~'f~ ~•~-~-~~ Date ~~ ~~- ~~-2
~- I
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 27, 1992
To: Offices Reviewing Rezoning Petitions
From: Janet Scheid, Planning Department
Re: Martha Chinault Rezoning Petition
The above mentioned petition is to rezone a piece of
residential property from Industrial M-1 to Residential R-1. There
is a 60 year old single family house on this property. The
petitioner is trying to sell this property and the potential
purchaser would like to expand the house. This expansion project
can not be undertaken because the house is a nonconforming use in
the industrial district. Thus, the request to rezone. The
Economic Development Department does not have any problems with
this site being rezoned to residential.
~~
NORTB
--e
a ~
Al lA.~7At
f
~ Al •• •.
At !
~P ~ a>nA. M 2
Al At
~ ! ~ •w , t M2
~ I At ~A : * t Al
~ I • ,..
At
Ar
Mi ~ O At
~?. Al ~,
-
.S. -
•; -
O r ,:,, ~ ~r /~ - -
-
' ~ ~l - Al
.-
tar ss - -
~ s ~"~ ~ Y2 1~{2 Ac1d
y ~ J iQ~ AcJq
3 -
-
., • .
" °° M 2 -
Y Y -
i y
- 54
r / y //
=.11fAt
~+ w ~ ~ /
'~ tliifl /
~ y 1 41
'- / ssi k
-•' 1 53
e y~ {p
N ! ,.~ ~ftAtlCl
•
T M Al
• /
* r / ~ .~+~
~.ss~a
~ t ~~ /
* /
... // 4
/ P/0 50.02.1-1
-- TE /• P10150~ -1.2
ALL PARCELS ON THIS MAP M ~ • •
ARE ZONED~_, UNLESS // A 1
OTHERWISE INDICATED. / /'1
COMMUNITYSBRVICBS Martha Chinnult
AND DBVBLOPMl~NT M- 2 To ~-1
40.J4-1-53
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER L.. ~° ~ "°'_ ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and
Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Board of Zoning Appeals:
Five-year term of Carlton Wright, Hollins Magisterial District
will expire June 30, 1992.
2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission
Four-year terms of Leo Trenor, Citizen at Large, and Charlotte
Lichtenstein, Neighborhood Organization, will expire June 30,
1992. Mr. Trenor and Ms. Lichtenstein have served two
consecutive terms and are not eligible for reappointment.
3. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Unexpired three-year term of Fenton E. Harrison, Jr., Catawba
Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1994.
4. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board
Four-year unexpired term of Mrs. Mikeiel T. Wimmer will expire
July 31, 1992.
5. Social Services Board
Four-year term of Betty Jo Anthony will expire July 19, 1992.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
Mary Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
~ M
i
.~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
RESOLUTION 62392-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN
CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM M- CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for June 23, 1992, designated as Item m - Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities
Serving Duxbury Court.
2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees for Action
Against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
3. Donation of Drainage Easements in Connection with
the Hawley Drive Drainage Project.
4. Donation of Easements in Connection with the
Development of Canterbury Park, Section 9.
5. Resolution of Appreciation to Paul G. Black for his
Services on the Roanoke County School Board.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the consent
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
_o
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Cliff Craig, Director, Utility
ACTION # A-62392-5.a
ITEM NUMBER ~~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving
Duxbury Court
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Duxbury Court, Beverly Heights Association, Ltd.,
have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the
water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along
with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Duxbury Court, dated
January 10, 1992, which are on file in the County Engineering
Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction
meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $32,000
and $42,000 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and
sanitary sewer facilities serving the Duxbury Court subdivision
along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County
Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these
facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
r i
Clifford i .E.
Utility Dire or
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
VOTE
No
Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
m-~
DEED (aF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT
THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 5 day of March
_, 1992, by and between: Beverly Heights Association Ltd. hereinafter referred
to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the
second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County,
VIRGINIA, party of the third part.
W I T N E S S E T H
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the
Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of
GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer
lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of
water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances
thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and
puhl is uti 1 ity, water and/or sewer easement areas that have peen or may hereafter
he installed by the Developer, along with the right. t.o perpet.ually use and occi_~py
the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly
shown and described and designated as follows, to wit.:
As shown on the plan entitled Duxbury Court dated January 10 1992 made
by Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering
Department.
Page 1 of S
F ~ 1 ""
The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible
for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer
systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility
trenches fora period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and
will perform any necessary repairs at its cast.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party
of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify
the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No,
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals:
Developer:
By:
By:
v,~I
G
As : ~~5 .
State of
-ou _' /City of : ~, .
t0 Wlt.;
The foregoing deed was acknowledger! Aefore me this:
~ ~~' ~ day of ~vr~ 19 _~.~~
B Y~ ,y~~•t S L. a s •Q a.~~~~
Duly authorized off cer Title
on behalf of ~5a~~
Notary Public
My Commission expires: l/ ~ c~
Page 2 of 3
Approved as to form:
County Attorney
~'~?
County Administrator of Roanoke
County, Virginia
By
Elmer C. Hodge
State of:
County/City of:
to wit:
The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this:
day of 19 ,
by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Revised 10/16/90
Page 3 of 3
~~
NORTH
• i i v\96MI~ -,- -- ,-
t off /AY/M/Nl
1 ~ • ~
l
~\
i' r ~ c
I /rr1/ 54.YN/
~.
~ -~
•
d' - ~ ~
' ~ ~ 0{~Y"Yrvf ~
L 7 6~[r/
,~ ~ 1
I:
•,
~ '
Q
~
, ~
v
' ,
~ PROtfA/J t~
NAYn/ N, MtSfi
/~. Of RY M MYSFL
o e my ,r, s7 6
ti
1
• '
~
'
r '
x
~
-- --
~
/ 7u a e.a
e•
Lo
~
;~
"
~
., //~R ro KN4t5,/
~ /L't /'Af9YLi4 i q ~
.
i
- 5•srw
W I
~ KMN~
.
~
~/ O~uoro•w I
;
1•tf.9
50 5'
6Tuq
[ur Lp
e.o' 3e e'
I/' • 51ue
",.,\
5r/~~o:/ wNNetr ~ -----~~ -- , O
I ~ ~ \ \/~ - ,,~ ,\
~' Lon rRA{ ne SYAU hYOnoo ~
Loutte n rNU a 5nR fs pvi / 1 • ~ \
-I tifvfRLY ,INHON// NOR/N•I~ (e A.7 'K.5/) \ \ `
' i°.
. s
1f~'IiRB ~
ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES
UTILITY
DEPARTMENT SERVING DU%BURY COURT
y
ACTION NO. A-62392-5.b
ITEM NO . °°
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees
for Action Against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ,i~~~,~,,(
r~ ~ ''
~~~~~
EXECUTIVE SUNIIKARY
The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal
expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc.
over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck.
BACKGROUND:
In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of
Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and
other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial
fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town.
Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed
that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation.
The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows:
February 11, 1992 $1,151.95
March 24, 1992 1,437.59
May 26, 1992 2,363.43*
*Revised statement dated June 11, 1992, indicates May 4, 1992
charges to be 50$ of $1,014.00 rather than 50$ of $2,924.92.
The County Administrator has informed the Town Manager that
the County shall no longer participate in future billings. It is
anticipated that no further billings shall occur, unless
specifically authorized by the Board.
FISCAL IMPACTS•
$1,779.16 in current fees to be paid from the Board
1
~r
contingency fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
payment of this invoice from the Board's contingency fund.
Respectfully submitted,
~~tM~
Paul M. ahoney
County Attorney
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Action
Vote
No Yes Abs
Bob L. Johnson Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Nickens x
Minnix x
cc: Reta Busher
c;\wp51\agenda\general\IegaLfee
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Reta Busher, Director, Finance
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
2
1`Yl - ~..
TOWN OF VINTON
P. O. BOX 338
VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179
PHONE (703) 983-0608 JOAN B. FURBISH
fAX /7031 983-0627 FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER
June 11, 1992
TO: Toe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
POB 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
STATEMENT
Statement From
Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC
For Professional Services Rendered
Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company
June 5, 1992 Statement -- $3,558.31
Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton $1,779.16
DUE UPON RECEIPT
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
T ^v vv i`7 OF Z'~TTON
CC: Diane D. Hyatt
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
A-62392-5.c
l '"'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements in connection with
the Hawley Drive Drainage Project to the County of
Roanoke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY•
BACKGROUND•
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item
following easements to the County
in relation to the Hawley Drive
Magisterial District:
involves the donation of the
of Roanoke for drainage purposes
Drainage Project in the Catawba
a) Donation of a drainage easement ten feet (10) in width
from Helen L. Cundiff, widow, (DB 651, page 569) (Tax Map
No. 55.06-3-17) as shown on a plat prepared by the
Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated November 25,
1991.
b) Donation of a drainage easement fifteen feet (15) in
width from Ray E. Carroll and Elfrieda J. Carroll (DB
1343, page 1212) (Tax Map No. 55.06-3-22) as shown on a
plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering
Department, dated November 25, 1991.
c) Donation of a drainage easement fifteen feet (15) in
width from Oscar W. Hall and Josephine M. Hall (DB 1290,
page 717) (Tax Map No. 55.06-3-9 & 10) as shown on a plat
prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department,
dated July 24, 1991.
d) Donation of a drainage easement five feet (5) in width
from Kenneth W. Hancock and Susanne Carroll Hancock (DB
1223, page 597) (Tax Map No. 55.06-3-23) as shown on a
1
w
~~ `~
plat prepared by the Roanoke
Department, dated November 25, 1991.
e) Donation of a drainage easement five feet (5) in width
from David N. Swain-and Tabbie W. Swain (DB 1171, page
654) (Tax Map No. 55.06-3-16) as shown on a plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated
November 25, 1991.
The location and dimensions of these easements have been
reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of these properties.
Respectfully submitted,
Vic ie L. u man
Assistant County Attorney
County Engineering
Action
Approved (~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Bob L. Johnson Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Minnix
c:\wp51\agenda\donation\liawley
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Cliff Craig, Director, Utility
Vote
No Yes
x
x
x
x
x
Abs
2
A-62392-5.d
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. i t ; ~" ~"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of easements in connection with the devel-
opment of Canterbury Park, Section 9, to the County
of Roanoke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : '~i~'+ ~~~~°~
SUNIIKARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of the
following easements to the County of Roanoke in relation to the
development of Section 9 of Canterbury Park in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
a) Donation of a 20' waterline easement from Boone, Boone &
Loeb, Inc. and Palm Hermitage Corp. (Plat Book 12, page
25) (Tax Map No. 86.01-1-1.3) shown and designated as
"NEW 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by
Lumsden Associates, P. C., dated 1 November 1991 .
b) Donation of a stormwater management area from Palm
Hermitage Corp. (Deed Book 1326, page 1286) (Tax Map No.
76.03-4-32) shown and designated as "STORMWATER MANAGE-
MENT AREA" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates,
P.C., dated 1 November 1991.
c) Donation of a 20' sanitary sewer easement from Palm
Hermitage Corp. (Deed Book 1326, page 1286) (Tax Map No.
76.03-4-32) shown and designated as "20' SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C.,
dated 1 November 1991.
d) Donation of a 15' access easement to the above-described
stormwater management area and sanitary sewer easement
from Palm Hermitage Corp. (Deed Book 1326, page 1286)
(Tax Map No. 76.03-4-32) shown and designated as "15'
ACCESS EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associ-
ates, P. C., dated 1 November 1991.
The location and dimensions of these properties have been
reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of these properties.
• .
` •..
x
i f ~
Respectfully submitted,
i ;
V ck' a L. H fm n
Assistant Co my Attorney
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Nickens x
Minnix x
c:\wps~\agenaa\aonahon\canterDUry
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Cliff Craig, Director, Utility
~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
RESOLIITION 62392-5.e OF APPRECIATION TO PAUL G. BLACK
FOR HIS SERVICES ON THE ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
WHEREAS, Paul G. Black has served as the Hollins
representative on the Roanoke County School Board since July, 1984;
and
WHEREAS, during his service on the School Board, Mr. Black has
supported a variety of interests and educational opportunities for
the children of Roanoke County. In doing so, Mr. Black has
o Advocated programs which would adequately meet the needs of
handicapped students attending Roanoke County or regional
special education classes;
o Supported continuation of an alternative education program
and the renovations to the William Byrd Junior High Building,
now the Roanoke County Career Center, to provide a proper
facility for students. This program has been a major
contributor to a significant decrease in the student drop out
rate in Roanoke County, which was 1.8% in 1990-91;
o Pursued an active interest in vocational education and
promoted whatever was possible to make the program viable and
attractive to students;
o Expended energy and enthusiasm to gain the funding needed
to maintain quality education for all students, and to assure
that programs would remain in place which would challenge each
child to do his/her best and promote interest and enthusiasm
for learning; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Black chose not to seek reappointment to the
Roanoke County School Board, and will retire from serving the
County on June 30, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf, and on behalf of
the children of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere
appreciation and gratitude to PAUL G. BLACK for his many years of
service to the Roanoke County School Board, and for his advocacy of
quality education for all the students in the County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. 4~olton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Resolutions of Appreciation File
ACTION NO. /~
ITEM NUMBER ~ ! ~ "per
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Appreciation to Paul G. Black
for his Services on the Roanoke County School
Board.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Supervisor Johnson has requested that a Resolution of Appreciation
be prepared for Paul G. Black for his services on the Roanoke
County School Board.
Mr. Black will not be present for the board meeting. Mr. Johnson
will deliver the resolution personally to Mr. Black at the School
Board Meeting on Thursday, June 25, 1992.
A copy of the resolution will be available at the board meeting on
Tuesday.
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
~'}'- 5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TIIESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO PAUL G. BLACK
FOR HIS SERVICES ON THE ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
WHEREAS, Paul G. Black has served as the Hollins
representative on the Roanoke County School Board since July, 1984;
and
WHEREAS, during his service on the School Board, Mr. Black has
supported a variety of interests and educational opportunities for
the children of Roanoke County. In doing so, Mr. Black has
• Advocated programs which would adequately meet the needs of
handicapped students attending Roanoke County or regional
special education classes;
• Supported continuation of an alternative education program
and the renovations to the William Byrd Junior High Building,
now the Roanoke County Career Center, to provide a proper
facility for students. This program has been a major
contributor to a significant decrease in the student drop out
rate in Roanoke County, which was 1.8% in 1990-91;
• Pursued an active interest in vocational education and
promoted whatever was possible to make the program viable and
attractive to students;
• Expended energy and enthusiasm to gain the funding needed
to maintain quality education for all students, and to assure
that programs would remain in place which would challenge each
child to do his/her best and promote interest and enthusiasm
for learning; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Black chose not to seek reappointment to the
Roanoke County School Board, and will retire from serving the
County on June 30, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf, and on behalf of
the children of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere
appreciation and gratitude to PAUL G. BLACK for his many years of
service to the Roanoke County School Board, and for his advocacy of
quality education for all the students in the County.
1" °'
COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
GENERAL FUND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Audited Balance at
July 1, 1991
January 28, 1992 Mid-year budget review
April 28, 1992 Flood damages
May 12, 1992 Renovation of RCAC lower
floor
Balance as of June 23,
1992
Amount
$5,060,731
(771,314)
(200,000)
(47,500)
$4,041,917
Submitted By
~ of General ~ 1>
Fund Expenditures
7.23$
5.77$
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement
to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25$ of General Fund
expenditures ($70,036,927).
~~
~" "~
COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991
August 15, 1991 Sale of Shamrock Park (Board approved
sale on March 26, 1991, Sale Finalized
August 1, 1991)
November 19, 1991 County Share of Traffic Light at
Northside High School and Peters
Creek Road
December 17, 1991 Roanoke County Career Center Ball Field
Lights - Emergency Repairs
December 17, 1991 Green Hill Park Playground Equipment
Balance as of June 23, 1992
Submitted by
$ 6,097
34,914
(12,500)
(lo,ooo)
(10,000)
S 8,511
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
~~
.~
COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1991 $ 50,000
July 9, 1991 Additional funds for Alleghany Health
District (8,000)
July 9, 1991 Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors
Bureau (3,000)
November 19, 1991 Transitional Living Center (10,000)
December 17, 1991 Vinyard Park Addition - Environmental
Assessment (10,000)
February 11, 1992 Legal Fees - Grumman Emergency Products (1,152)
February 28, 1992 Stop-Smoking Programs (1,500)
March 10, 1992 Contribution for Hazardous Household
Waste Disposal Day (3,300)
March 24, 1992 Legal Fees - Grumman Emergency Products (1,438)
May 26, 1 992 Legal Fees - Grumman Emergency Products (2,364)
Balance as of June 23, 1992 $ 9_,246
Submitted by
7~.~ t-Cx..rnlzJ ~ • ~~1
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
N ~ •: n t~ ni m J !. n. i ' n 7 h ~ O N ~ tJ ci ~ ri it N i ~. fl. j n n~ n t1 i~ i
~_ i-_ i .. .. - .. ~I
N
P
o .-
o °~
o ~
0 0
W W
U' F
¢ ¢
a^
' N
a
7
C N
a P
> \
!m a ^
tr M
~c
• '+ U7
rn ro c
L 7
+~ W
~ U F-
¢ ¢
^
I~ ,D
Y C Ii
Oro O
C
roUU7
O a Q
2 V
ro I
4.r E
Y~
p•~=
T N Z
~•+ W O
C f
7 4-
O O J
U Q
Y U
I C U)
a .-+
E U.
a
I +, ^
i U) ^
I
N j
I a
I 7
C V-
a O '.
>
a~~
I ~ rod'
I ^
~ N f
I r rol
I .D
I a.
~ I I
~ I
I ro I'
i a~`
L
C
^ I
H
~ I
I
I
I
I
+I
1
I
1
I
I
I I
IN I
a I
I7 I
rIC I
r y 1
CI> I
E CC I
I
i
I
I
jY I
a 1
P I
~ I
7 I
tL] I
I
I
C!
7I
U_ (
_ j
rol
Li
a'
C!
a!
C7 I
I
o~
f
^
Z:
U_
Q V
n c
•r_a ~ dT V ~_a v a `{ r
nin n
~ n ~ n
.~.. ; ~ . '
° i a n
' i _~_.? ~ ' c ~S ~o o •a F. r. r r~l
I
~ I
i
N N o o ~+ P P N Ll o~~ M P ;o P U~ M M a~ ~o a0 0 0• .- .- IP h~ ~.p o o 0 0 o f
V PhM•to^PL~~JN No0~~~.-tTNNO~oI~rr,•<1'PNMUIV•oNoo~n~
Ph~NPv~PPOIo^N~c+MI'-hh PO+ M I~U1 U1 I~^NV ^Mlo ^
haploh W OJpDOPPfAOpOppplPPl(10pq~~0 pDNP~POPPOUIo P'
N ~- P N ^ I ^ P I ^ I .-
I
II I I I I I I II I I I I I I I 1
UI M~UIPONQ)?,,.-Q•U~ hen ~i0~(1JM1 ^PIM V Ul F'1PUl NNO]1lIOR Ph
N tri '^ U'1 ~ M ~O N .P o:. V M Q~ P P o ;N t? •- 'P P o I.- Ul ~O P M O N In ~- W P I
M^I.-N^I'`~MhllnoPlP.-P.-h<tIINV'M^U~pMPt~•~UIp+M^ NoI
b y iP h N !u N AJ .o Ul Ul h M P V' h- v h0 v N h- -- ~ M o I^ q• h '7 ^ M P• o
u~ 'M ~^~~ N i7 Ul N N N ^ P I 'V• v N N P Ul h .- M '^ ^ M V o
^I^ ~ ^I
ap .-
op .O ~t o P ~ h 7 lay lfi M ~J ~ M o P P ~N ~ ~ IP P o ~M In ~ iW M V' I7 U1 Ifl ~ N I
O O I'•• h Cp I~ h h P P o Io W 0 lop h N 111 <t M^ ~- u M o P a h M to M ~O !n
lP to ;P h h 1'l ~ N h 7 P ~N ^ o U1 ~ P~ P h o^ ~o M o IUD N W ~^ 0111 I11 h I
~oa0 W tnh.Uho',oU'1Ul--P.-~NInO)V'~o MNN~oPO.r•Ul~U1PN ln~
h' ^ I~ N Ln Ul Ul V' N N ,N ^ l!1 N ~~- N ~J N ^ M M P ~P ^ P .-
~. I ~M N N -- I . I
N I N 7 ^i
^ ~^ ; ~ ^ I
N
0
0
ui
Ul
P
O
~J
h
0
7
0
P
O
h
I ^ap
NLtl
l ~ap7oN~PVM,V MhI
Opohr- V'
U10p~OM~La~ N U~ V, MP
Nr•NMNU1 U1 ap •ct Ul ith
~-~O'P V UI~ V'U WIM J~ P
P~tUI MI ap
.- V• I
I
M ap N o0 ^
^ o !n aD M P
In o ^ I
- .p M
I .No^ hj ~
- i
.i - ,
_ .i _~ .
I N N In ~ P
j
I ~t o cr Met o i o ~
I
~
I MP
Ph
I I
I ;
7P`P^.-•'.f-oMV•P~u I
^N^^'o .OMh^U9 - .
-
N M.-PhP
NI^ _ ,
.
M.-OOPh
N hwN ,I - ~
hv7 N~lllh^
NUI V
N ~n-- .
o; .-
Ulu tf~
Ul^
I - MN ^P ^i
1
^ ~ ,
M'N^ NI
i PP
I 1
j j
'
~ N
I
<r o
I
~o 0 0 o U'i o'o 0 0 i
~o 0 0
0 0 0
Io 0 0
o I
Io '
I I
h O
io 0 o IO ~ o',o o O
:o 0 0
0 0 o ~
Io 0 0
o o
I M I
hj o Op i Ul o .- o M o DU P h cU 0)
'V' O M :h p ~I^ pp ,- ~p I~p
~- o Io D o i .- ot11 D o i o 0 0 o h M o o Ili M o oI h o M'N N N
v N ~; o Io
Mo otllooPO
ppo Ut o Ulo oPM Ul UI to I
V' O ~
' l
1,(1 N P O Op [U 17 h .-
•
' ;
IQ ^ o
Ul Ul
^ N N
o MOP
IN ^ ~- hoD `n v7PN~111hM U7 111
.- M P h M ~0' N 7 ~0 ? 7
I V
hl M IoO}Q
V
~I7MM INNOp ~ N IhN MMo'~~.o.- IPIncU N N
M N I
I ^ Iv N N i .-. ~
i M ~N ^ <t - m .U
W ap
t
I a L I
N a '
I O
o
;
~ p I I
I O IJ
N ~ I~
~
j C2 I N.-. T W rov
C
U •~+ ro
~. O a .,.
C UI a 3
~ UI
a
C
.+
ro i
o
UI Q
af ro x w x u1 ~ Ul
I x
L Y ro x a
j
ro v
a S ro a
•
U
ro
' F- 0 UI 1- ro x
N C
d a 1- ro l C O f H O
x O a
Ul LL•
N a 4-
L O U1 E 7
a N C i ~ I to L
L +
'9 a L Q 7
U1 T L L 0.•I F-I a •~+
O a 0 1 T U r ro E U.
F O a
a CT a
a 7
N *+ a U L a
•.~ Ol > .', tq O U O
¢
U ,..' C U)
I a ~+
x L U +~ ~ a; •.. ro
C 7 x N J V O U
a O: a tL C V_ a •'+ N
O a O > O a
L L B I
.. a N O
ul .-~ 1n ro +. U
m pl I ^
roa
F d a,~-+aro.-. CI L
U •~+ _H •.~ a x a O
I
I m L
C •+ ro ~~
O ~••~ M
L La•.
ro L E as .
N N ,
..maj•..ro c z
N U N I U U L E~
O
I a L l
~+ a J
r U
ro .+ U
> UI O •.~ I F- U a
a a
U V a
I
L ++
UI r 7
7
O
L O O
U U
L
X 7
L a 0 ~
0 •.~ C O o i 0 U I U_
U L
'
i Y d
L N C ~ a J .~•+ 0= i
..~ O L
a C CI
U _
0.
O L a a
v1 a Qi L C
O dI r a i ~-• N J
I ro
V ~••~ a s ~.;~-• N 1 a L I
U) •~+ ro L N,' N a C l J L a x 0
ro U U
4-I TL
d C N w ro C V
L ro Ol x;.a ro ri C lni ¢ J
a a W
+ ro'
i
N •
+
UI ro
' W C
F+ ~+ U) a ul I •.a ] O
U •-+ C i E a t 1
~..b I 1
1+
- C
.r ro
ul O.
+• I
O ro a
U 7
m v7 .~
a 1 t
.
•
L
F ¢
L v I a U) U i U U_ a I O I-
O
~••~ UII~
~+ -. a ;~••~ 7 C i U L UI 1
-+ ro E~ ro UI •.+I C O a'
•~ .. 111
-. a a
L ro I•
a E U
~ Y
E m LI I
O 111 C ~
v a a ~-.
~ ,O a
L E UI a ro U L i s 0.I I- O
> U a~ ro L L' a L N F-
I
' ro LIJ
. a aI ] C TIU C NI N Y xl•
7 a ro .O O 7: L O ro ~ ,. r x L
Y O ro a •~+ C
• C ro L a a~
a a ^ O C >I
L ~•+ a ro •.+ UII
L a •
+ O I L a. a ai U a C
U C ro'~ L ti O t ro ^
a
'
'
CC al
a 2 d IJ U Q]iU_ L I-'
7 S I- O
Q J'
0. lL U
a U_ ~ ~
,
U~ EIS 0 t
a ~+ ++~ L v L,
j 2
Z !q 3 O O 4
O F-'
O^ C
~
U M vIo .- NIM 7 U11.
0 h W P
o ^~
N R h
W P o,
N O ^~~ .
Q
~
o ^:V M .O'
M
^
l
^ N N N'N N N:
N N NiN
M M,
M M Mi
M M VI
R 111 (11
to ^ N
i cA
~ ~
U h O
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0:O 0 O!
o 0 o
o
0 0.
0 0 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0
0 .
PPP, I
0
f
~ ~
I
l
l N
I 1
~
0 0 0 oIo 0 o
I
N '
o '
ll1 I
0
Ul
~ ~
(U
N
_ ~-- - L- ~- - ~-
y- •t ^r ~ ~~n m n nl n u - n n •
SU
P
o ^
o ~
o ~
0 0
W W
V H
Q
CL ^
I
C I
O j
•+, I
ro
•~ I
L i
[1
O
L
CL CU
aP
¢~
~ M.
ro C \
~~+ ro Ul ~
c o
rnu,w~
L a F
•~ U
?c^I
N
L lL '
a~O',
-x E
'O'tA
C U Q I
ro C
O LU 1 ii
CY
_'
~~- UI ~ '
O a Z
L O
TEL:
y
C J'
7UQ
O C V I
v a rn
a... I
w wj
~ ^i ~
O
a U
C'
7 I 7',
~ ~ w
a
L ! "I
V rol
UJ I L I
I a
I C~
Vii
of
CU
I
= I
^
^ '
Y
L ,
O
a
a
CL
- --- - -
t
m u rv 1 n ci ; ~ i ~~ r~ ~ n ri ii i n n' n n •• t> v •r v v v ~r ~ n n ;i ~ ci
___ _
. __1 I ~. _ ~ I.._ _. I____ i.._ _.
~ 1
1
LfY
--
C J]
a E O I
+~ I OO N M
I a~ ,.' a I v P
x U rn 1 aG 'a) oG
W C ro ~ I
W 7 I
^ N m I
F- ~b i
' ro I I
. r i
i I
'
h
a I
^ ~N 00
L a l i W Lf7 O
'i a U I ~ ~ 1W '~Y
! L C I ., i
I I !
E r° o ~M o7
.
I M ^
U ro I IO
m I
I a I I
C 1
~ ~
N'
I a~ I ~ v ,M F
. Li s I P 'M ~'
7 I E I I o iN o7
~ ~ 7 I I
U^ I G~ NM
~ ~ C 1- 1 I ~ I M W
CI W>- I j -- ~^
i al I
a.
I x' w I v
i
W I
'
rna ;
C U I I
' M'
I P r-
I~.. C I I O L ^
~ ro I
C L I
~ F i ^
•-
~ roJ] t I ^ N^
~ +• E 1 ,
N 7 I ~
iv U
7 C I j
j i0 W I I
'
N I
I a I I t6 M V
L I <l1 0 M
T 7 1 i O Vr 00
~ I
's•v I ^ N
C C I ~ M
IO a 1 '
salj
I
x I .
W
M 'lfi V
O+Io .-
~ IP ~
~ is to
i
i
rN• ~~ o
G+,c+ .-
7 :O OJ
^ :M
N!
I
~'P V'
O N iU
oJ'M c~
P '~] OJ
G~ ^
Q IM
M
0]
MI
Q• I C1 ul
OiM In
lfi i V' OJ
N,F
~T ', N
~ to UY o
J~ M~^i
N fVOC~I
O;Q+G+P ~
~ V'
o t`-
.-
~O U N ^ '^ a0
N io 7 0? {!l Ul
oloaNlh~
.o N N ^
!rl IUi M -~ ~- M
CrIIo~NNN
PN V'Nh0 V
Olll G+oINM
u1 ~^ P ^ 'til N
r~'u1 o M ~^
st INN
N ^ N lil ~
~D , C h- M 00
oIM N
!al ' N
N ~ M M o o M
NAM ~- M N N
.0 o? 7 N ' V' V'
olai G+III ICM
~-iP N N I^ OJ
v :.- r-
' I I
I i ~
N 1 O~
0 ul -aD
^ P
M 'o o
I V M P Q
o d
v I ( N uN IN aO INO ~^ n
rn l i P A N 'N R ~ Vl N ul
~ I i PI M N o ^ iN N (1
I 7 1 I -- V^ ,QU h M ~o d
m i
l
i
I I ui ui ~~ u
^,
Z
tL
++ E ' +
ro h ~
L iC
!
I +' N I L
C ro C l
E U E 0.
'O •.+ ' C 0.
i ¢ v- L a n
~ v- a a c
I .•. o > c F
I ~ O L
~b O O K
V I ~ I .-~
C V h I +~ ro +
I ro L , ro ; a In I •~ c
''~ ~ N i L
I N U 6
' O a L a ~+ E
' a ti Ln C r C U Q
w; j a 7 l
~
r ro a 3 C
.. L
ro io 3 jo 0.
~-
.
ro O to Nj C E ;o C
NIL +~ ^ a; O ~N !L
a U io L~. E r o
CnC y, 7:E ~ ~ 3
a' a O ~ O ip
JIC9 W. i VU > ~ ,J
O O O I O' O In O
~- CU M ^ I OJ CU ^
Ni N OJ ~ M
o~oo
I ~
~'~ o00
', o
IIN~M'Mo
NNMj~to
IIN W lit-~N o ,
,~U1 ul M IUD o I
IIN^^~Do
N M M ^ N
i N CU
I N
a
U
>
L
al
V?
C
O rn
.~ ~ ,
r•
C U v
a -+
t•+ •~
a 7,
^ m ~.•.
~a io
I7 W C L
u o +. ~
N C C
a O YO C
V 7i O <
' ~b U L I ~ .•O. <
a Yjro Ir
a L NiEtL c
' ~ L C • I
O Oi,C N
lL V VIQ T
IoootitN
M M M M M
0 0 0 0 0
M~G~ Rf
v c+ aa'i
to ~.- v F II
~~PPIi
N'M o III
or•oap
a iUl N M it
M N ~-• 00 ; I
v L- o M I
0 lJl N
~ao^
Hula,
- W 00
~ m o
- CU v'
1 M R
'1M~
nMF
i c ~. n~
n rv.([fr
`~ f
ii
I
h M P V' O M ~.Q~
~O G~ ^FoM~o
o P N Ct? o N 7
PP W c~oPio)
! ^ ~
I ~
C• iP M o ~u1 N :~
w !N N P o CU .c.
O ioN~N N'R
M 'M N ,N Ul N
m I tll -- N'^
7 N j
Mi^~~O~MP N loolfi '~-v7~o?
Mc~o)c.o c+Ml 7 c•li1NN~t ~~a~
Ul iF ? Ul'N ^ N I W ~O .- Vi M o ~ i7
CU 'FW ~lcNC+ Ul Q,MOir-~MICU '
O 'N .- M N o~ ~o N 0? N N .- o iP
r+ F v 9J VI o I M N .cam M.
^ ~l ~
^i
I I
O ^ ^ N I In ' V ', '.
^ N14~ V' .0 F'll
N^ ~ ~• •- I P ~ I
V' W ~- N i ~l I '~ I
N ^ ^ I ul
v9 F lf5 P'a0 ^ ^I ^ IM M~IF m~o
MiM o0 wlo N OJj w iO o~n oo
-- ~ N V' v7 l ^ M R .- ' v7 In N o ul
I ..
IN W N~ c~ N N i ~~V• ~~'i)1
I o ill ~- Q~ N v P N .-
i
N ^ ~ ^
I
I i j
~i~ N P,M N o N ~o M ~'N 7 N~.V
M ~O OD I~'NNo .- f~N ^IN7G~'a~
^ IM 'V 0+ u1 In OJ I 7 i CP V• N to o W ~ G~ ,
~111o+MCU~Im o+ OJMMMOCO'm
N~Cr ^ h•IM M Q' N M OG f-'o0 ~- CUio '
o F' ~ CU O ul I M P c~ M'~~ ^ .
N I U7 -- I I ~'i
I
E C ~ ~'~. N
O 7 i ~ C '.
V OI O
I L!
L t7 '~ a+
o ro
V ~tl a N
ro ~ , '.
L N I C
Y rn m w! m
N MI ~ w, rn
c ! L I o~ a L I
U' O i j a L O
EI .•~I N 3 I UI; U ro ~'
U ~••~ ~+ a ~ i C U N '
ro 7 x U ~ ++ N -+ a
O r O > ~+ ~ v+ a Ul N I•
vL aalrnaL n ! v•-• c ci>
rn N U A E a 7 ~ N ro C' N O a' L
CIJ ^ rol L V ' 2 S r~Q r ro, to
rol C a -+' o c 7 SI
rvaa.aaro o ~u u~ ;.,
~ a ul v C rn L rt N~ L'~ ~-+ L' ro
ln' L a- •-+! rn L c c a a n In ~', u
Ul i a+ a N C N a i a 7 7 7 C O, O '
I
oLnoVlIo LCIO ~o In o~lnOhlo '
^NNMM V' NNMMV Qllt
•t i V 7 C~~ ~7' ~ <f '~, lli Ill lit 111 In lTi, Ui
o ~~, 0 0 of o 0 0 ; o 0 0'. 0 0 0' o
. !~ ~~.i n
N
O
N --
o
o
O v7
O O
W W
C9 F-
4
ao
9
j
N
i C
i O
r
ro
.~
L
a
0
L
o. N
d c~
¢~
>7 M
'N C \
• ro~
~iC o
,CTN W
iL d F-
I~+ U <
~ C Gi
• L u.
dao,
~a E
O 3 N
iC U Q
i~9 C
O W
._
4- N F-
O ar Z
L O
'T7 E
r +, I
C•-+J
7 V Q~
ocvl
~ a vi
o.
I x (~.
W
O
I I
.+
I ~ I
W I
L '
' In
U
N
~O
C7
L
O
a
2'
I~ ~ ~ ~
0
CI'
Z I
~I
tL
1 1 5 _ ~i
~^ u q c~i~~ ~i u i ~~ ~ n `ri ~~ h n i
I
'O 1
C .~ O I
a' E r 1
a7,• a. 1
x U O I
W C N U 1
W 7 1
Ci U1 4] I
F W N I
r 1
d I
L d I
v u 1
C I
E ~0 1
7 '+ 1
u ro I
C W I
d I
c 1
a I
a I
L I
7 E I
r 7 I
••+ U D I
v c r- 1
C Y- I
d I
o. I
x I i
W 1
n d
C U I
c I
m I
C L I
2 J] I
r E I
N 7 I
+• U I
7 C I
W I i
N '
y 1 j
L
N 7 I
r I
IL .•, I
r L I
C C I
o w I
En.l'
x t i
W
I i
1
r I
W I
~ I
L 1
7 1
m I
I
I
vM.t•oo
•-(mot-o
op0oo
ap o) o
(`- 7 M1 M
~ to to
b _ _ ,
W N N
~,••• - N 1"J N Nt
r'i N 7
v~i ~CimtMnb iu
{'' tF 1'J ~ N ~,
(~- V• r1 V• ~ FJ 7
{U•-y N h• 4~ 7 J w
~- C M
IIrM p- N
I
,t] P Ill V'
'r~ oo a
~- N M
N t!i N
M
'M ~ V' l!1 o UI
C lfi lJl M o V' '
v uira~ °
,o .n c+ N v c~ i
lo'~ c m o I
N N
~~n .-voMlo coI
Ifl o ~ N t71 'o I"1
o W i9 o M I~, I~
7J N N O+IN
N oo.-~ N o
4ti 7N~ W
M N
N ••+ 7
E C V
7 ~
s rn w
1 L
Lo c
a o 0
L r d •~
N N •.~ r
~- I L > ~0
'+ r L N
a ~ to d r L
3 C C N C U
O •'+ 0, N
W E O E ~
r U M L
t N Q U
~ d UI .+ Ui
L I O C L Y
b U V O C L
d ,L W N
S ~ r r 4.
C 7 .r
o W~.N d rp o
o L r •~+ L o I
I In N ~ N UI L 7 N
o s L +~ r r o
L ,~ Ul C '+
b I••+ N O 7
I 4.JQVV i
I
O ;O 0 0 0
~M V' Nlv~
i N ti h N ~h
oooolo
_ 1 1 1 i
o~ ii ~ v v v K v v a v ~ m u
NC-ltM.~:o .-oboo#
U~ N Mme'` ~o`nooo
Mo UIf'1~ V•N Ill
wCOC~vh•ln No I,t
I
oN~00~tf M NCJOOo
oMNW O]p O~ t~-OO~ok
No oNfit a0 v Wb~op
.O N ~ N o0 lfl ~ 4~ G~ O Q' Ui
U' ~-N•O I O lJi .-O~b'
N f'i N
1 1 1 Jr -~ . ~ _.
~ n •~
u ~ .. ~ r ~l
II t
>0 00 7tJt
~ o o p M ~
I o t~
o ~
I
I i
ItUVIJt 1
V' I
NN,
7
'7--P M oo I o
io Cl6V I
00 .-o I N
l M o) O) N
I N ~a t0
N N o M o M
o r ao N ~
I M
I to i to
t'i t~ NNOD ~ UJ ~'tN ~ o~
,- o G~ Ni ~ r V -- Ui o
Mo IN~c~ J9 ~N o
c~ N ~ lfi ~ p0 I`- NM I IJl f~
M o Iti lJl N o 7 lJl
M ~ CD M
N
OJ
N
W
N
M V' I f~-
r- N ~ c~
LIl N ~ N
,I
lfl N I 00
Ol I J~
~ N o
ro ! m
V 7
111 ~
o (`- C-
M Lfi 7
N I(U ltl
U17I NNUlN ~t NG~I
c~N ~
MN!7 fti oM1
~
f'1 I'1 ~,.
~- .- i N V' lYJ
I
dNi V•M~l
I - NM',
CU M -- W ~- I
i
I
st o!M~o.- o, Noooo
r- R '[9 N o 00 M C o o sr o
LJJ O ap N N i~a o V o o .O O
.I .~, .j,
U19'NNOri ~, NMO7o
oN7Nh•.- N st OO.co
V'~M~- I o N N•-
E'
m
L
rn
0
L r
a c
ro
C C ;L
O r O
•~•+ G ..
UI d 3 r UI
CT C E ar N d
C d O. ••, r U
••+ ++ O > L L
C x .•+ N 0 7
ow da: ao
N > N N
ar N r C N
•b ~ GI C N fY
Qf L '
QI ++ U E F ~ U
~~+ L ~ E ~-O. U ~L
C NO ~ iO
C a. C N .+ 'r
N OI O > J] N
O~U ar 7~~
~VIWC1dIS
Jt o'iIn o o to
~ma~aoroo
D O O O O IO
a
r d
c m
a lu c
E O I
a jn •.+
a c In ~
'. Im a
d ~ •.~ 1
> , E
a, E C i
CJ ~ O O I
TV r ~
T N .+ C I
r r Lr++:
•~ •~+ d L ~ L
C 4.. fD O
~ 4, N, 4r 1
E C 7W{~1 L•~+~
E W O I~ ••+ L J
O W d k- Q at ~
V C W L 1
Qr ti %.+ .~ U l
O d ~ N 1
O >. r+ , d C of :
W O W~ O UJ 1
o ~•+ U 7 1
G. N x p14.1•.
E ~.. 'b N Wif
W S F ~ CIO
o Ili 'o It1 o I V
CCU I`IM Rjt
c~c~c+c ~o
O O O O OiG
I
I
0.~ V•
sr •-•
0 00
hi 0]
N --
0
n
u
7
al
a U
7 C
. a ro
U U ~-+ N
L C b r
~~omc
J r+ 7
A V O
~mwu
r U
i T IO Q
1 U •.+
i C L'~•
1 Qf QL
U O 10
1 C L r
i ~ a c
c r a;W
~ C N i>
i O C ~ C
V ~ r.
1 o N Itn
' Lrl Lf1 Ul
c, v, o
r O O p
Q+
NI
I
1
.~ I o7 Y'i I ~.
N' M N ! .•.
v~ uiMl c+
o ~ o m ( ~
~- I r` lrl I N
~ ~ .- ', 00
v v
? i -- ~ ~ N
NI ui f~J' o
~ I ~ ao ' to
,I
In ~ N 00 ! ~
N i 7 lrl ; o
.- W ~ o
W i to
~ i r J-~ I
r 7
CI O O Y
d 7
E UI Ui I O
r L L I
L N W i N
~0 0. 'ti L
o•I m N a
d C C 4-
ol, ro ~o, m
1 L L C
C; FFI N
O'i I L
Z! U U I F
C C
o '' 7 7 0
0 0.w ; ~
4~ L b ' C
o N L' o
r r
rr C ~
-- N
~ ~ i
c~ c+
O O ~
O '
N
M
vl
m',
In
tJt
0
N
N
N
G~
lfi :.
M
O
ht
r`
aU
O
o .
In
~i
N
o i
O
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. s"` "°
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Update on Enforcement of County Weed Ordinance.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~,~~~,,,2„~f~,~f-~" c~-~C-r
~ / ~~ ,
('_,iL~-sic ~~~'`,~r-r3'~ _ - l~-C ~„~,..y~ ~ c nru,~_ ~ .
BACKGROUND:
In December of 1991, the Board received the attached report
that provided an overview of current weed enforcement procedures
and an analysis of the effectiveness of these procedures. During
1991, approximately 96~ of the known violations were corrected
within 21 days. In December of 1991, the Board accepted
Alternative #1. authorizing the staff to continue with the
enforcement procedures in effect since 1989. This year, during the
current "weed season", we have success rate greater than 96~ using
these procedures.
Per recent Board comments, we have contacted the other
jurisdictions in the Roanoke Valley to ascertain how they enforce
their weed ordinances. We have determined the following:
Roanoke City
The City of Roanoke sends a 14 day notice to weed lot owners.
If the lot is not cut, the owner receives a second notice that the
city will cut the lot, and that the property owner will be billed.
If the bill is not paid, a lien is placed on the property.
Typically it takes the city at least 60 days to schedule the
cutting of the property.
Under this procedure, the city spends approximately $50,000
per year cutting weed lot violations. They recoup a "very small
percentage" of this amount through bills sent to the property
owners. The city representative indicated that under their current
procedures, the City has become a referral agency for weed lots.
Property owners prefer to have the city cut the lot, rather than
have the time and expense of cutting it themselves. Because only a
~l
~~
~. ~~
2
very small percentage pay the bill, the number of liens on property
is becoming unmanageable. The city representative indicated that
they have a desire to change their local weed ordinance.
Town of Vinton
The Town sends one letter and gives the property owner 10 days
to cut the property. If the property is not cut, town crews are
assigned to cut the property. The property owner is billed at a
rate of $72.50 per hour or piece of equipment necessary to perform
the job. If the bill is not paid by the property owner, a lien is
placed on the property.
No budget line item is designated for this activity. The
service is funded out of the Town's Street Services budget. No
information was available on what percentage of the property owners
pay their bills.
City of Salem
Salem sends a 15 day notice to cut the property and then
follows up with a second 7 day notice. If the property owner does
not comply, the City cuts the property with either a city crew, or
by use of a private firm. City crews are used for "large jobs",
while private firms are retained for smaller lots.
Owners are billed for the cost of the mowing. If the bill is
not paid, a lien is placed on the property. No information was
available on what percentage of the property owners pay their
bills. The city budgets over $2,000 per year for this service.
Respectfully Submitted,
\\~
~~
Terrance L. Harrin on
Director of Planning and Zoning
Approved,
~~ I ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
"~ '°'
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. -~~`=~7'"~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Report on Weed Ordinance Enforcement; Status of
Current Regulations and Procedures.
COUNTY AODMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
This report was prepared to respond to the inquiries of
several Board members who were interested in the procedures used
to enforce the county ordinance that regulates the growth of weeds
on private property.
The Department of Planning and Zoning is responsible for
enforcing Section 13-14 of the County Code. This section requires
that Roanoke County property owners keep grass and weeds on their
property cut to a length of 15 inches or less. The code also
outlines a process for administering and enforcing the requirements
of this section.
In summary, the enforcement process involves:
1. Notifying the offending property owner by certified mail.
The owner is informed of the violation, and given
fourteen (14) days to comply with the code.
2. Allowing the owner seven (7) days to object in writing
to the enforcement agents determination of the violation.
3. If the owner fails to comply, and the enforcement agent
finds that the violation is a clear public nuisance, the
enforcement agent may request that county officials abate
the nuisance through the use of county forces or by
contract. The agent may instead pursue criminal
sanctions.
~~ ., ~..
2
4. Procedural steps to recover county costs incurred in
abating the violation. These steps include administrative
hearings, the publication of assessment lists, and
securing property liens.
During the 1991 "weed season" the Department investigated and
resolved 126 violations of this section. Of the 126 violations,
approximately five (5) were not resolved within 21 days. One of
these cases was resolved as a result of judicial action. The
remaining cases (approximately four) were resolved
administratively, but administrative action took longer than
twenty-one days.
In almost all cases, violations are the result of ignorance
of the law and not a willful desire to violate the law. The few
difficult cases result from absentee property owners, property
owners who apparently lack the financial resources to achieve
compliance, or properties that lack clear title, are "tied up" in
estate actions, or trusts. In these situations, the staff has
worked with attorneys, realtors, relatives, trustees, etc. to
obtain compliance within the shortest possible time frame. While
some of these cases have taken an extended period of time to
resolve, the staff has taken a customer service approach to their
resolution. We have attempted to use legal action as a last
resort.
Since 1989, the staff has not pursued the use of county crews
or private contract to abate violations at county expense. As was
demonstrated this year, the vast majority of violations have been
resolved quickly as a result of certified letters sent to the
violating property owners.
Although the code allows the pursuit of property liens to
recover costs associated with direct county action to abate the
violation, these provisions are difficult to apply in practice.
Difficulties arise from the following factors:
1. The county does not have any work crews who can abate
these violations. Mowing contracts would need to be
secured with local private sector firms.
2. Local contractors have expressed hesitancy about entering
and mowing private property without the owners
permission. Although our local code authorizes the
county to retain private services, contractors would
prefer the owners permission.
3. The Department of Planning and Zoning currently budgets
$400.00 for mowing services. This amount would be
insufficient if we were to pursue a private contract for
F
3
every violation not resolved administratively within 21
days. Many of the more difficult violations are large
acreage tracts.
4. The administrative and legal costs to prepare and publish
assessment lists, hold public hearings, and secure
property liens are high. The potential for recovering
these costs in the short term is low. Under our code,
costs can only be recovered through action on the lien.
SUNIIKARY OF INFORMATION:
The Department of Planning and Zoning is responsible for
enforcing Section 13-14 of the County Code. Over the past year
ninety-six percent (96$) of the investigated violations were
resolved within 21 days as the result of administrative action.
The remaining four percent of the violations were also resolved,
but action took longer than 21 days. Judicial action was necessary
in one instance.
Over the past three summers the staff has elected not to
pursue the option of direct county action to correct weed ordinance
violations. This decision has been based upon (1) our high
administrative success rate, (2) our interest in working
cooperatively with county property owners to correct violations,
(3) judicial system support for criminal actions we have pursued,
and, (4) the large amount of fiscal and administrative resources
necessary to pursue direct county action.
ALTERNATIVES•
1. Accept this report and authorize the staff to enforce
Section 13-14 using the administrative policies in effect
since 1989.
2. Accept this report and instruct the staff to enforce
Section 13-14 through direct county action, using either
county crews or private contract to resolve violations
that are not able to be administratively resolved within
21 days.
FISCAL IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVES:
Acceptance of Alternative #1 will not require additional
county resources beyond those currently budgeted.
Acceptance of Alternative #2 will require an additional yearly
allocation of approximately $2000.00. This figure is an estimate
based upon our experience the last three years. This additional
4
funding could be allocated to the Department of Planning and Zoning
as part of the annual county budget process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends Alternative #1
Respectfully Submitted,
,\ i~
. -~,
Terrance L. Harr' gton
Directo~of Planning and Zoning
Approved,
~~ ~o+.~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Action Vote
Approved ( ) No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Ref erred
to
Motion by Eddy
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~~~~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: June Report on 1991 Water Projects
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND'
In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will
provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow
Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water
Transmission Line Project.
SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT
The construction of the reservoir is now in its seventh month and
the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last
month included:
• Grouting along the west and east rim
• Removing overburden from the quarry areas
• Installation of the two 42" pipes that pass through the dam
including concrete encasement
• Excavation of overburden in the area where the dam will be
constructed and excavation of the cut-off trench along the
axis of the dam.
• The archaeological work on the potential historic sites and a
final report is being prepared by the archaeologist.
• A three foot chain link fence has been installed around the
potential historic sites to protect them during construction.
• The access road to the pump station and gatehouse has been
redesigned so as not to disturb these sites.
After reviewing the archaeologists report, the State Historic
Resources Commission will make a recommendation as to what
additional protection if any, the sites should be afforded.
~~ ~~
,~.-
Page Two
During the next month, the contractor will perform the following:
• Rim grouting
• Excavation of the dam foundation using the excavated material to
construct the pump station and gatehouse access road
• Construct cut-off trench
• Begin construction of the river intake pump station by grading
and excavating for the 60" borings and casings under the
railroad
• Work will also be started on the two 54" pipes that will replace
the stream between the river and the railroad
Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir
are $2,202,010 for construction and $377,604 for engineering
construction phase services.
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
The Water Treatment Plant is in the design phase. The architect is
preparing the drawings for the treatment facility buildings and
jointly preparing the site plan with County Staff. Design of the
various treatment processes, residue handling facilities, finished
water storage and high service pump station continues by County
Staff.
Work on the Sanitary Survey of the Roanoke River watershed above
the reservoir intake has been started by Anderson and Associates.
The Joint Permit issued by the Virginia Marine Resources for River
Crossings has been received for the two water lines that will be
constructed between the reservoir and treatment plant. Staff
proposes to have the reservoir contractor install these two water
lines as part of the pump station intake work in order to minimize
the impact on the river.
County staff has completed construction of the 200,000 gallon per
day pilot water treatment plant at the Glenvar site. The pilot
plant was placed in service the second week of June and is
producing an excellent quality of water. On June 16, 1992, the
River water was so muddy (turbid) from the thunderstorm that the
turbidity measurement was over 100 NTU which is the maximum our
instrument measures. The water treatment unit consistently
produced finish water with a turbidity of less than 0.2 NTU. The
goal for finish water is 0.5 NTU and the maximum acceptable by the
State is 1.0 NTU. The average turbidity of the water in the
Roanoke River is less than 15 NTU. For river water of less than 15
NTU, the pilot treatment plant produced finish water with a
turbidity of 0.03 NTU or less. The initial week of the pilot plant
operation indicates that it is capable of treating water to a
quality of at least five times better than is commonly accepted for
public water supplies.
r'.,~ ~,
Page Three
During the next month, the following work will be performed:
• Design will continue on the treatment plant and site plan
• The pilot plant will be operated and optimized
• Operator training will continue
• The meeting with the Army Corp of Engineers to discuss permit
conditions will be the last week of June.
• Complete installation of the second river stream gauge at Dry
Hollow
WATER TRANSMISSION LINE
The following work has been started on the Water Transmission Line:
• The contract for legal services relative to obtaining easements
has been awarded.
• The initial section of the transmission line route was selected
• A meeting was held with the affected property owners
• The legal firm began work to certify title for the affected
properties
• Staff began meeting with the property owners to discuss
obtaining the required easement.
During the next month, work will continue on the following:
• Route selection
• Title certification
• Easement negotiation
• Easement plat preparation
• Preparation of construction scale drawings for the portions of
the route in which agreements on easements have been obtained.
• Easement acquisition and construction drawings will proceed from
Starkey to Spring Hollow so the water line construction can
proceed in that direction. This will allow us to test and
place the water line into service as it is constructed because
we have a supply of water from the existing county system.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
Cliffor ig, P.E. mer C. Hod
Utility Director County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
,.
ACTION #
~' #~~~
ITEM NUMBER """
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
Solid Waste Facilities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Below is the current status of the regional solid waste
facilities:
Smith Gam Landfill
The contractor continues to focus on completing the erosion
and sediment control ponds. Rain and wet conditions have
delayed completion of the ponds. Roanoke County inspectors
have directed that all work be focused on erosion and sediment
control.
Progress is being made despite the poor working conditions.
Currently, construction is approximately 40 days behind
schedule, however, the contractor indicates that the final
completion date has not been affected at this time.
The advertisement for construction bids for the Tipper
Building is expected the first week in July.
Transfer Station
The submittal of the final design and Part B application to
the Department of Waste Management is expected by June 30,
1992. Advertisement for construction bids will be placed the
second week in July with bids due mid-August.
Demolition of the existing building will be the responsibility
of Trinity Industries and will begin by the end of June. The
demolition will be completed within 45 days.
Final site plan review by the City Planning staff will require
some modifications. If modifications are considered
significant, approval must be given by the Planning
Commission.
Rail Spur
The rail spur clearing is approximately 50~ complete with the
contractor making excellent progress. No major problems have
occurred to date.
All right of entries have been granted and no delays are
expected due to acquisitions.
The tipper equipment is being manufactured and should be ready
for installation in October.
Salem Contract
The Salem Member Use Agreement has not been approved by the
Resource Authority as we are still waiting for further
comments from Roanoke City and County.
Attached are project status sheets for each component of the
solid waste facilities.
Respectfully submitted,
Gt__ ~
hn R. Hubbard
hief Executive Officer
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
~~~~r*~
r
PROJECT STATUS SMITH GAP
LANDFILL
1992 1993 %
SCHEDULE
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C
WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E O
N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M
U R C I E Y U T 0 E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P
A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L
R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E
Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T
Y E R R Y E R R E
R R
TE CLEARING .........
........
........
........
........
........
........ ........
........
........
........
........
........
........ ........
........
........
........
........
........
........ ........
........
........
........
........
........
.......
0
ACCESS ROAD 2
TIPPER SITE 50
DRAINAGE 10
SED. POND #~1 0
SED. POND X4 __ . _,>.` 43
LEACH. TANK RD 0
WATER TANK RD
MISCELLANEOUS 15
DISPOSAL AREAS 0
DESIGN FINANCIAL STATUS CONSTRUCTION
S779,850 Contract Amount $3,068.541
-0- -0-
Change Orders
S779,850 TOTAL S3,068,541
5503,175 Payments to Date S 417,598
64% Percent of Total 14%
Olver, Inc. Contractor Thomas Bros., Inc.
6/92
" ».:
PROJECT STATUS ROANOKE
TRANSFER STATION
1992 1993 %
SCHEDULE
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D C
WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C 0 E 0
N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M
U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P
A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L
R A T M E 8 B R A T M E B B E
Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T
Y E R R Y E R R E
R R
BMIT PART A ........
........
........
........
........
........
........ ........
........
........
........
........
........
........
0
SUB. VARIANCE W I T H D R A W N 100
DESIGN 50
PART B APPL. 90
CITY APPROVAL 90
ENVIR. ASSESS I 100
ENVIR. ASSESS II 100
ACQUISITION 95
DEMOLITION 0
CONSTRUCTION ! _ ..,: .. 0
FINANCIAL STATUS
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
S460,000 Contract Amount
-0- Change Orders
S460,000 TOTAL
S169,570 Payments to Date
36% Percent of Total
Olver, Inc. Contractor
6/92
-~`...,
PROJECT STATUS NORFOLK SOUTHERN
RAIL SPUR
1992 1993 %
SCHEDULE
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C
WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E 0
N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M
U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P
A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L
R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E
Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T
Y E R R Y E R R E
R R
ESIGN .......
........
.........
........
......... ........
.........
........
.........
........ .........
........
.........
........
.........
00
ACQUISITION
95
C
LEARING G
RADE
12
TRACK CONST.
0
SPUR TO TRANS. 0
DUMPER
10
CARS
0
COVERS
0
FINANCIAL STATUS
ESTIMATED COST: S9,000,000 (Design, construction,
capital equipment)
RVRA to pay actual costs not to exceed S9,000,000. Payments to be made in accordance with contract.
Percent Complete: 10
6/92
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23 1992
RESOLUTION 62392-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the certification
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session
1
ACTION NO. A-62392-7
ITEM NO. '"`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Request of Reinhold A. Winnemuth for a Special
Exception Permit to Operate a Barber Shop in an M-1
Zoning District; Located at 5221-A Starkey Rd in
the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : .y~yv~~ ~ ~+.v~'s~~C
~(Jccti ~~
NATURE OF REQUEST:
Mr. Reinhold Winnemuth has requested a special exception
permit to operate a barber shop at 5221-A Starkey Road. The
property is zoned M-l. This permit is being requested under the
authority granted by Section 21-24-1 (A) (15) of the Zoning
Ordinance which allows B-2 uses to locate within an M-1 District
provided the use is supportive of area industry.
The proposed barbershop will be located in a portion of a
space originally designed as a construction office. (See enclosed
site plan.) The County staff has reviewed this request and has
found no significant impact factors resulting from the use of this
space as a barber shop. Adequate parking exists on site to
accommodate the use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors approve the special
exception permit request of Reinhold Winnemuth to operate a barber
shop at 5221-A Starkey Road.
~~" ~
~'a,.r ..
f
2
Respectfully Submitted,
Terrance Ha ington
Directo of anning and Zoning
Approved,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( ~ Motion by Vii. Odell Minnix Eddy x
Denied ( ) motion to approve Johnson x
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred Minnix x
to Nickens x
cc: File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
~ / I ~ I
ROANORE COUNTY '"~°` ~
' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE
1. Applicant's Name: e-n~n~ol 7`irnn~c.~ ~Y1nPw~~~ Phone: 7~y-~~1z
Address: ~j ~ y ~ ma ~ on Kn o~ I r
~o~,n~k~ ti~~,. Zip: 2yfl~ ~
2 . Property owner' s name ~. e -.~,, ~ ~~ i ~ ~', ~ r p
Address: 5 ZZ ~ S-i-~,r keU ~ S', l~J, Phone:
~OH n o k P vet . ,.Zip: 2 `~D I~
3. Location of Property: ~ Z Z ~ ,4 S-}-~ ,~-~~e ~, I~ S t,J,
~o~~n ~k~ _V ~, Zyv ti ~
Size of property .~ acres/sq.ft.
Size of proposed special exception use Z:-~j s acres/sq.ft.
4 . Tax Map # : g 7. ~ JC '-Z " g Old Tax Map # :
5. Zoning Classification: m -1 ~,,~ I~l'1 -Z C.
6. Magisterial District Location: ~c~ ~. ~ ~,~ ~- ~ r1 A
7. Existing Land Use: ~ ~ h, ~:~ r~ h o ~ t ~ c~h c~ Co t~~ 'v G r f~/` ~{~~~ e
8. Proposed Special Exception Use: ~ c~ r ~ ~ r ~ ~ o D
9. Comprehensive Plan Designation:
10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue:
t~r~c~~o~a. ~ 1~.;~~ys~r-~.~
Value of Land - Value of Proposed Buildings
Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed 2
11. Check Completed Items:
8+~" x 11" plot plan _~ Consultation
~/_ List of adjacent property owners ~ Letter of Application
Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke"
$1,875 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill
method garbage and refuse site
$40 All other Special Exception Uses
12. Date of Application:
13. Applicant's Signature: ~ ~.b~fA ~,~
14. Owner's Signature:
~,,.
Mr. Reinhold A. Winnemuth
6848 Mason gnob Trail SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
(703) 774-6812
May 26, 1992
The Board of Supervisors
P.O. Boa 28800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter to request a special exception use
for 5221-A Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia.
I would like to open a family owned and operated Barber Shop,
The shop would be equipped with 2 barber chairs and a small
waiting area for customers, I hope to average 10-12 customers
per day.
Any consideration The Board could give me in this request
would be greatly appreciated.
Sin~erel~:.-_ ~'
~- ~ -:--
/~ ,
~ _ i ~,
Reinhold A. Winnemuth '-~
-°E`' /
N
O 1
Q N ~
W O
U ~ ~
y o ~
_ = Z
X N
1~-
Z U> 3 U
H W 6 N
x I I i ~
0~ •8\~
~ 3
O W O
N
H
Y Q W W
W
~
O `
J O N
J 1 I
3 ~ ~
~ o O
W
2
J ~ N
Q =
;~1
NI I
W
I
'V
!t ~ o
I n
w
I •
O
W ~ ;(
O .v
i ! >
J b
_°
t
Q
d
~ O
I a
i/ ~ !~
W ~
7 O
O
~~oPost ~
b~~
(~~ ,
s ~ ~,~
Z't~
:~
ti ~
~wx, ~x
w
t=
as
z
0
~'
W
f
I Q
~
1 '
I
1 a
~
``
r
I /A
1
. ~ N'
~ ~,
~.
W;
OI
V. o
n; e
<' N
~ I 1"~J
i
h
b
~ 2
ON
Z ~ O ~
I 1
~ Y ~ C
W ~ W
o =
I = i H
I~ ~
~ t X
I ~
H
I
IIIIIIIIIililllllllllillllilllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllll
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
1 PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~ p~ ~ G"-~--~J ~i v~ l~,S e-
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~~e~ n ~, o l d ~ ~ n n~ u--~ ~
ADDRESS ,~~~I-~ M ~50~ K~o~ 12 Val
PHONE ~ 7 ~--~- - ~>~ ~ ~,
nnnninnn~nninininnininn~niininnininiininiin~nniiinl
page 1
~i
We, the workers of the area industrial facilities surrounding
the Starkey Road area, would appreciate and benefit from a Barber/
c3tyling Shop located at 5221-A Starkey Road, Roanoke, Virginia.
~_ : ~~
~, ~.
~`
r ~~
<~
--~\` ~,
.x ,
.:~
~~ ~. r.
{ {:' ,
~ ` i,'
,p
r
> ~ --
. -s-, ~ ~~ ~- -
.~ ,
~, ~, ~
.~ ~-:
., r* ~
t ~~~` ~~ /' , ~~,...
V ~f~`~~k~~ ~ f
V ~..JC i.` __
^, ~ ~ ,.
q ./'~
/ ~~ j =~ f~
r'
~, ~,
~~,
~~ 1~
n ~. ~
'~.
1 ~ !' % i / j~ ,
/ ~~
~~~ , ,
~n
!/// ~-
~~ /~~' ~
, ' ,-
---,_,
1 ~ \
-_
_/ ~%,-- t
`,.J~
< ~` ~?.
~%~ ,~ , -
(~ ~. A __ ~
~~~ ~~~
~ ~
~ ~. "'
f' ~\
~~~`~'"~ S~~! "~ ~~"°L fir, r... ,~!-i"'~
~~ f
~~
t.J/ ~._ ~ ,/~~// / C
LC~
w
...~ ,- f
y%
~~ ~`
'''/j
i ~ ~~--°.' r,, - ~~ /
~~(( .t
~ ~~1~~ ~~
~ ~LQ ~) ~ 6 ~~ ` ~
~ `~-~
G~'~~1 ~ r~_ ~~
page 2
~i~-ss~~fl2=~j` i • -~
'~!.> ~.. _ ~~. '. t:: ' ~~z: ~. ~~~
~„ - - - -:-
;~~
''.~~,
%~ ,~,.~ ~
~_ ?
~~fn~~ «%~~~
~~~~~ ~
_.
~,~~)~ ~,' `~, J~1~~i~ C~~~vG' j
j R -
,/ ,~ - /" !~~. ~/~~//mar/ /7.
_r~ , ;/ ~
/( / ~-
r ^ ,, f j ,` ~~~
~/
,, .
;.
~~~.
,,A
~;
/rte ! 'r
"'' l'
I 1
`~
q ~ ~
/ 1
i _ n
~~ ti ; 4 ~~.
?~ 1---
. ~
- , ,.
t
~, ~~ L~
~ ,~
_ .__~_.
,,( ri
~/
/ ~ ~ ~' ~~
~"
..~ j~
~~,
~`
~ r
~' ,
,~ i~ 1 ~
4 ! t.- 1
-~ ,~, ,r~_~,'~ ~~~~'~~~~ - ~'_r~ l . ~,~ ...
~ ~ + J
,,
,j ..
'/`
r ~ J '~
l,` ~ 1/ n
,_, ~ 't
' l ~ ~~ ..c.~-~-~
~~~~~ ~
_ ~ ~" ~/'
~~ ;,<
F ~~ ~
,~'
/ i ,~.-
/° ~'
f !~ j1 ~~'f~r
~U
~~
~~ `_~ C=r xt - ~ J
~/
~~
~~ ~ ~~
~, ~}
n
~ ~~
~' ~ ~,~--
\, `J
i `
/~ Y
~~~
~, tares
,~ ^,,
`~ `~v~ j1~~ ~ ( ,~,~.~~i, ,-
+~-~ `~,
i,
I ~ I~ ~-
,,,~ , ~ ~,~, .r ~s~
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Intent to Enter Upon Certain
Properties (Roger E. and Sharon M. Vest) and
Take Certain Rights-of-Way in Connection with
Development of the Forest Edge Water System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
I have deferred this item because of conversations that I have had
with the property owner. I believe that we are getting close to a
resolution which will make these condemnation proceedings
unnecessary.
In the interim, we have obtained the rights-of-entry which are
necessary to proceed with the well drilling.
This action will be scheduled at a later time if necessary.
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Approved by
,~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Nickens
0~ ROANp~.~
-~ L
t` ~ p
2 ~
J 2
a
1838
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
June 18, 1992
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
Mr. Roger E. Vest
7892 Five Oaks Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Vest:
~""^
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Per our phone conversation, I am deferring any condemnation
action on your property until the July 14 Board of Supervisors
meeting. This matter had been scheduled for Board action at their
June 23 meeting and is being deferred because you had previously
planned to be out of town that week.
Our purpose in wanting to acquire a portion of your land is to
drill a well to supply water to residents in that area. It is my
understanding that we can proceed with the drilling of the well
during the time that you are away.
Between now and July 14 we will continue discussions to try to
resolve this matter to our mutual benefit. If you are in agreement,
please so indicate by signing one copy of this letter and returning
it to me.
Very truly yours,
/ crc
Z^
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ECH/meh
Enclosure
cc - Mr. Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Mr. Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility Department
Mrs. Mary H. Allen, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
% ~ , I
/ ' /
Roge E. Vest
® Recycled Paper
~;~ r.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION PURSUANT
CODE OF VIRGINIA,
INTENT OF ROANOKE
PROPERTIES AND TO
CONNECTION WITH THE
WATER SYSTEM
TO § 15.1-238 (E) OF THE 1950
AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE
COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN
TAKE CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FOREST EDGE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Immediate right-of-entry upon the proposed well site and
necessary easements through the property of Roger E. Vest and
Sharon M. Vest is required in order to begin drilling of an
additional well in the Forest Edge area of Roanoke County. To
avoid further delay, it is necessary to enter upon and take such
property prior to the condemnation proceedings. Virginia Code §
15.1-238.1 makes provision for the County to subsequently institute
and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said well
site and easements.
BACKGROUND•
On December 17, 1991, the Board authorized County staff to
negotiate options and drill well sites in the vicinity of the
Forest Edge and Carriage Hills Subdivisions. (See Attachment A for
copy of Board Report.)
Staff has been negotiating with Roger E. Vest and Sharon M.
Vest to purchase a portion of their property (Tax Map No. 95.01-1-
46) for use as a well site. Based upon an M.A.I. appraisal, a fair
market value offer of $4,954 was made to the property owners, which
offer has not been accepted. The Vests were notified by certified
letter of the public hearing for immediate right-of-entry scheduled
for June 23, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., before the Board of Supervisors.
1
",,.,~ r
~.~.~,
SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION
The proposed well site is a 100' by 100' parcel of real estate
located in the southwest corner of a 13.74-acre tract which is
located on the south side of U. S. Route 221 just opposite State
Route 1950 in Roanoke County. .The proposed permanent access
easement and temporary construction easement to the well site is
across Five Oaks Road and along the rear lot of line of the 13.74-
acre tract. (See Attachment B.) The entire 13.74-acre tract is
currently assessed for $18,600.
FISCAL IMPACTS•
$4,954.00 - 1991 Capital Improvement Program Funds
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution
authorizing immediate right-of-entry to the property in order to
begin drilling of the well, with condemnation proceedings (if
necessary) to be initiated and conducted thereafter.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
c:\wp51 ~agendaVit~vesc.rpc
Motion by
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Minnix
2
x.
~. ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO § 15.1-238 (E) OF THE 1950
CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE
INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN
PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN
CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THE FOREST EDGE
WATER SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That, due to drought conditions during the fall of 1991,
it became necessary to authorize the drilling of additional wells
in the Forest Edge area of Roanoke County; and
2. That, in the process of acquiring options for well sites,
staff negotiated for the purchase of a portion of the property
owned by Roger E. Vest and Sharon M. Vest for use as a well site,
said property more particularly described as follows:
A 100' by 100' parcel of real estate located
in the southwest corner of the 13.74-acre
tract identified as Tax Map No. 95.01-1-46,
plus a permanent easement (20' wide - 850'
long) along Five Oaks Road and across the rear
property line of the 13.74-acre tract, with an
additional temporary construction easement
(10' wide - 850' long).
3. That it is the intent of Roanoke County to enter and take
the property and necessary easements hereinabove described for the
Forest Edge water system.
4. That, pursuant to due notice as provided for by the
statute, a public hearing was held on June 23, 1992, on the
adoption of a Resolution pursuant to § 15.1-238 (E) of the 1950
1
.~',, ..
,, ~ ,~; ~
Wiz: ~„,,w_
Code of Virginia, as amended, concerning acquisition of and
immediate right-of-entry to said property by Roanoke County.
5. That the fair market value of the aforesaid interest to
be acquired is $4,954, such compensation having been, and hereby
is, offered the property owners.
6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter
upon and take such property and commence said drilling of the well
in order to maintain an adequate water supply in the Forest Edge
area of Roanoke County and to thereafter institute and conduct
appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said water system.
7. That pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-238 (E) of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to notice and
public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board does hereby
invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and provisions of
said § 15.1-238 (E) as to the vesting powers of the County pursuant
to § 33.1-119 through § 33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, all as made and provided by law.
c:\wp51 \agenda\lit\vest.rnn
2
~^
~.~.-, ._
ACTION $# A-121791-8
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 17, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization for County Staff to Negotiate Options
and Drill Well Sites in the Vicinity of the Forest
Edge and Carriage Hills Subdivisions
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The existing wells in the Forest Edge Subdivision were not able to
keep up with the domestic demand during the recent two-month
drought. It was necessary to prohibit all outdoor use of water in
order to maintain adequate water for fire protection. In addition,
it was necessary to haul 105,000 gallons of water in order to
maintain an adequate supply.
Due to the low production of the existing wells, the Virginia
Health Department has requested that Roanoke County discontinue the
issuance of building permits for any new houses in the Forest Edge
Subdivision until additional water supply is provided. They have
also requested that the Roanoke County Health Department
discontinue the issuance of septic tank drain field permits in this
subdivision.
Staff proposes to drill additional wells in the Forest Edge area
in order to provide adequate water supply for existin a
lots. The estimated cost for this work is $50,000, g pproved
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative No. 1. The County Administrator be authorized to take
necessary action in order to obtain options for well sites in the
Forest Edge area, and staff be allowed to drill on potential
productive sites. Funds are available within the 1991 Capital
Improvement Program that was contained in the recent bond sale.
ATTACHMENT A
~+uwe 1 w ... *:...5.w.. ~„~
~~
Alternative No. 2. No additional wells would be drilled in the
Forest Edge area. The restriction on new building permits and
outdoor use of water would continue in order to maintain adequate
water for fire fighting and existing indoor domestic use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative no. 1 with the understanding that the
water be used only to supply existing lots of record that currently
have County water services installed.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
Lf~
Cliffor r ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Di ector County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by:_ Harry C. Nickens
Denied No
( ) Substitute motion to approve Eddy _
Received ( ) staf~ recommendation Johnson
Referred
to McGraw _
Nickens _
Robers
Yes Absent
x
x
x
x
x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
• ,D E C- S- 9 1 F R I 1 3 4 4 L E }{ I N G T O N R O ! i 1~ r
• S J
~-'"
~c
COMMONWEALTH o f VIR~IN7A
.'
P 0 2
.~if~"'~
L~~
~.~ ~d-
c.M.a surra~r. ""°. Department Of Health ,~ sovm ~uroo~n, rang
~" Olfice of Water Programs `010"` ,~',°;~
Environmental Englneertng Field Oltice ~~ 4~1 ~•"~
December 6, 1991
SUBJECT: Roanoke County
Water - Forest Edge
Mr. C 1 i (ford Craig, P.E.
Director
Roanoke County Utility Department
1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem, Virginia ?4153
Dear Mr. Craig:
In regard to the Forest Edga water system, the water sy$tedt is
11m1ted by source capacity. Due to recent drought conditions, the
well capacities have docreasad to the point that the water system
can net support additional residential development.
Therefore, w~ are requesting that Roanoke County discontinue the
issuance of building permits for any new houses that are proposed
to be connected to the water system unt i 1 such t ime that add i t ions I
source capacity is provided.
8y a copy of this letter, we are also requesting that the Roanoke
County Mealth Department discontinue the issuance of septic tank-
drain field installation permits for new houses that are proposed
to be connected Lo this we ter system.
We will notify your office and the Roanoke County Health Department
when the above request can be rescinded.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any
questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
.9 r~
Joase O. Mayhew
District Engineer
JOM/cw
cc: J. T. Nininger - RaanoKe County Building Official
Roanoke County Health Department - Margaret L. Horgan, M. D.
VDM -- Richmond Central
~ t^ ,
r o
.. ,~
.~, ~
;' ~ ~
a ~ ~•~
L I • 'i•N `
C w.. ~ : ~ ~
y ~~ ~ ~ ~.
~~ ~ a
., t i ti
~t ~i'x " R
w •c~ ~ ~ .~
~.
6` • ~ •, x ~ Z .~ n..y
,., ~ vii ~ .~ ~'~ .y ~~ ~ ~. Z
~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ •~
(~ ~ ti w ~ ~ Z ~ • •
~. ,N~
rn ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ s
F ~. ~ ,g, o't .`~ , L~
o ` v ~ ~ ~, ~
-~ ~ ~ ~ p ~, ~ ~ r ~~ ~ ~
N r ~ ~
r •
~~yy ~
y~+ r
t ~ A '. 1\
M + ~
~o N ` ~ ~ ~
I• ~$
~w ,~` ~
~~ ~ _ ~~i ,
~ '~ ~... ~
~~ I ;~~
~ ~ ~ .~~
~ ~
~ ~
...
~ • ....r-....
' ~ ~ ATTACHMEr]T B
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. ~~ '"~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: First Reading; 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : G~~;s~-ti-~~'" ~~/ ~}`'~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Included with this report is the June 15th draft of the 1992
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission
recommends this draft to you for adoption.
This draft incorporates all of the revisions contained in the
June 4, 1992 Addendum to the March 9, 1992 draft. It reflects all
of the modifications made by the Planning Commission in response to
the public comments received since March of this year. A summary
of all of the Planning Commission's changes is contained in the
document entitled: Summary Table of Comments Received and Actions
Taken on the March 9, 1992 Draft of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance. This document was distributed to the Board at your June
9, 1992 worksession with the Planning Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors hold a First Reading of the
ordinance on June 23, 1992, and schedule the Second Reading and
Public Hearing for July 28, 1992.
Motion by
2
Respectfully Submitted,
Terrance L. Harrin on
Director of Planning and Zoning
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Ref erred
to
i ~`''°
Approved,
~~
_!~~ ~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
ROANOKE COUNTY BY THE REPEAL OF SAME AND BY
ADOPTING AND REENACTING A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE
FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, AND PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN
TRANSITION PROVISIONS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
THEREOF
WHEREAS, the old zoning ordinance for Roanoke County was
adopted over twenty years ago. It was reorganized and updated in
1985 to improve its ease of use, to correct possible legal
problems, and to make standards and documents consistent with then-
current conditions. Its substantive provisions have been amended
from time-to-time to address evolving issues of growth and land use
in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission and County
staff hve been laboring for the past three years to develop a new
zoning ordinance for the County to address the changing needs and
land use patterns of the County and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted in accordance with and
pursuant to the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 11, Title 15.1 of
the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and Chapters 3 and 9 of the
Roanoke County Charter; and
WHEREAS, the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is adopted
in order to implement the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan to
address future growth and development policies of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the adoption and reenactment of
this zoning ordinance will improve the public health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the citizens of the County and will
1
~"~`'"" !
a. ~
assist in planning for the future development of this community to
the end that transportation systems be carefully planned; that new
community centers be developed with adequate highway, utility,
health, educational, and recreational facilities; that the needs of
agriculture, industry, and business be recognized in future growth;
that residential areas be provided with healthly surroundings for
family life; that agricultural and forestal land be preserved; and
that the growth of the community be consonant with the efficient
and economical use of public funds; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission and planning
staff have conducted numberous neighborhood and civic league
meetings, work sessions, community open house sessions, and public
hearings to advise and inform the citizens and the development
community of the provisions of the new zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter April 7, 1992, and June 2, 1992; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June
23, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held on
July 28, 1992.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, 1985 edition,
as amended, is amended by repealing it in its entirety, Sections
21-1 through 21-140, as amended.
2
r~
2. That the following provisions of the Roanoke County Code
are hereby amended by repealing them in their entirety:
a. Sections 201.00 through .202.00 inclusive of all
subsections of the Public Street and Parking Design
Standards and Specifications of the Roanoke County
"Design and Construction Standards Manual."
b. Article II, "Public Dance Halls, " of Chapter 4,
"Amusements" of the Roanoke County Code.
c. Article III, "Shooting Matches" of Chapter 4,
"Amusements" of the Roanoke County Code.
3. That there is hereby adopted and reenacted a Zoning
Ordinance for Roanoke County, being Appendix A of the Roanoke
County Code, as follows:
3
~~- ~
4. That the following transition provisions shall apply for
the application and enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke
County:
a. Until revised official zoning maps are approved by
the Board of Supervisors, the zoning district
designations and regulations of the adopted and
reenacted Zoning Ordinance shall apply to the
existing official zoning map designations and
districts as provided in the following table:
Existing Map Reference New Text
A-1 AG-1
RE AR
R-1 R-1
R-2 R-2
R-3,R-4,R-5,R-6 R-3
R-MH R-MH
B-1 C-1
B-2,B-3 C-2
M-1 I-1
M-2,M-3 I-2
b. Upon the filing with the County by any owner of
real estate of a site development plan, an applica-
tion for a building permit, final subdivision plat,
or any other plan, plat, or permit required by or
under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance, before effective date of this ordinance,
then the provisions of the repealed Zoning Ordi-
nance shall apply to such plan, plat, permit, or
application, provided that such plan, plat, permit,
or application shall receive final approval by the
County within sixty (60) days of the effective date
of this ordinance.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after July 28, 1992.
c:\wp51 \agenda\code\wning.ord
'I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
-PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~rouck'r~ ~• ~/UI~cS ~~-~'
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY TIIE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~ic,~ w~t~t-r~v~'y s~~~- ~',~'~~A
ADDRESS . _ ~ 535~~ ,~ ,~~ ,~
PHONE ~~,~~ , 1/.4. ~~oi~
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
ROANOKE REGIONAL
HOME
BI11lDER~
ASSOCIATION
President
Jim Buck
VlcePresldent June 23, 1992
David Vaughn
Treasurer
Bob Fetzer
Secretary
Risk wl,itney
Mr . Terrance L . Harrington
Director of Planning
Immed. Past Presldent
Bob Flynn COUNTY OF ROANOKE
VP/Associate Post Office Box 29800
Bili Johnson Roanoke, Virginia 24018
VP/RemodelorT"'
Rick Collins Re : PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
Directors
Fred Baldwin Dear Terry
Jim Beavers
Worth Boone
Kyle Cook We have enclosed a copy of RRHBA's position on the June
BiliCorbitt
Ed Cronise 1992 ro osed Draft of the Roanoke County Zoning Text
P P
Allen DeWeese along with a Summary of Comments .
Danny Feazell
Gary Feazell
Jerry Jones We appreciate your continued interest in soliciting our
Andy Kelderhouse
Kirk Lumsden
views as this zoning ordinance approval process
Steve Lyon continues . We would like the opportunity to discuss our
Joe Miller
wayneMorris
summary of comments in more detail with the Board of
L. C. Peters Supervisors prior to the Second Public Hearing.
Howard Poage
David F. Radford
cnlpScruggs
Earle Shumate We are leased with the ro ress made to date and are
P P g
Jon Williams hopeful that our remaining concerns will be recognized
GoryYamine and addressed.
NAHB Llte Directors
Elbert Waldron Sincerel ,
y
Ron Willard
NAHB Directors ,~.~
~ ~/~ ~
~
J. T. Huddleston ~
~~~~~"vC.G~-~2
"~"r
Charles Simpson ~
Richard S. Whitney, Jr.
HBAV PastPresldents
Frank R. Radford Chairman, Zoning Task Force
Maury Strauss
Elbert Waldron
HBAV Vice Presldent RSW JR
~1CW
Lew Jamison .
~
HBAV Directors
Jim Buck
Biil Johnson Enclosure (s )
Jack Loeb, Jr.
Steve Strauss
Legal Counsel
David Helscher
ExecutNe VP
Melody Williams
1626 Apperson Drive, Salem, VA 24153. 703-389-7135 • Fax 703-389.4130
Affiliated with National Association of Home Builders • Home Builders Association of Virginia
ROANOKE REGIONAL HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION
Position on Proposed Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County
The RRHBA compliments both the Planning Staff and the Planning
Commission for their efforts with the monumental task of a complete
rewrite of the Zoning Text. The text as currently drafted goes a
long way towards addressing problem areas experienced in the past,
clarifying definitions, and is written and formatted in a more user
friendly document.
The RRHBA, however, opposes the Zoning Ordinance as currently
drafted. The first and foremost concern is the timing of the
implementation of the text without the Zoning Maps. We recommend
that the text be approved with certain modifications but not be
implemented until such time as the map has been approved and
adopted. The conversion table proposed to be used will be
effective to a taking of land in many circumstances until the
proposed map is adopted. Although staff has indicated a two month
time frame for preparing the draft map, the final approval could
take many months before being adopted.
Over 80°s of the land in Roanoke County is zoned R.E. or A-1
which currently allows 15000 SF lots without public utilities or
7200 SF lots with public utilities. The new zoning text would
require all lots in these districts to have a minimum size of one
acre regardless of utilities available.
The new zoning map may resolve this inequity by rezoning some
of these lands to the R-1 district. But the question and concern
is when will the zoning map be adopted and how long will property
Page 2
owners be severally impaired. If the map becomes controversial,
the time frame for approval may lengthen and may further
necessitate numerous rezoning petitions to be filed. It is
essential that either a definite timeframe be adhered to in
approving the zoning map, or that the Zoning Text be approved but
not implemented until the Zoning Map is approved.
The second major area of disagreement is with the methodology
of the larger lot sizes in the agricultural districts. RRHBA
agrees with lower densities in the agricultural districts, but we
believe this can be handled with "Density Zoning". We recommend
that the AG-1 District average 1.5 acres for the entire platted
subdivision with no lot smaller than 1 acre; that the AR District
average 1 acre per platted subdivision with no lot smaller than
20,000 SF, that the AV District be reduced to 20,000 SF.
One reason given by Staff for larger lots is a concern about
growth in areas where utilities do not currently exist. This is
coupled with a concern for septic field failures.
Prior to November of 1982, there was no formal testing of land
located within platted lots of a subdivision. In some cases, the
developer/owner had random tests made through percolation test
holes which were not always accurate. After the lots were put on
record and a building permit was to be secured, the Health
Department went to the site and checked the soil for a septic tank
permit. Thus prior to 1982, platted lots normally were subject to
Page 3
Health Department review after "the fact" and sometimes approval of
questionable soils was the outcome.
In November, 1982, the Virginia Department of Health approved
stricter regulations which dictated that drainfields be approved
for each platted lot and all accompanying documentation be kept on
record at each respective Health Department. These requirements
were subject to all localities who had the Health Department sign
the final plat. Roanoke County did not have this requirement so
lots were still being platted without Roanoke County Health
Department approval of drainfields prior to recordation.
Not until July 1, 1988 did Roanoke County fully implement a
policy for subdivision approval with on-site sewerage disposal and
achieve coordination between the County and the Department of
Health.
Based on the above review procedures until 1988, the Roanoke
Regional Home Builders Association feels that lot sizes are not the
main reason for septic field failures but the lack of stringent
standards for on-site sewerage disposal systems. Roanoke County
now has a workable policy for subdivision approval with on-site
sewerage disposal systems which additionally includes reserve areas
for .questionable soils which should help eliminate the problem of
drainfield failures which cannot be done by simply increasing lot
sizes.
Additionally, RRHBA feels the County should be encouraging
development in areas where the new water supply lines from the
t
Page 4
Spring Hollow Reservoir may be extended. With additional density
for lots with either sewer or water in AR Districts, development
will be encouraged to utilize County water. If this is not
changed, the Board may be facing numerous rezoning requests in the
future once water has been extended to these areas.
The remaining comments by the RRHBA are outlined on the
attached "Summary of Comments". We would respectfully request
that we be allowed to discuss these items in a work session with
the Board of Supervisors. We feel that many of these items can be
resolved satisfactorily with a two way discussion of our concerns
and recommended solutions.
ROANOKE REGIONAL HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
Roanoke County Zoning Text
• The text and Maps should be implemented concurrently.
• Change definition of Utility Services, Major to not include
community water and establish specific use standards to apply.
• In the AG-1 District:
- Revise Frontage Requirement from 150' to 120'
- Increase allowable building coverage from 10% to 15%
- Increase allowable lot coverage from 25% to 30%
• In the AR District:
- Reduce Minimum Lot Sizes w/o sewer and water to 1 acre
average size per platted subdivision
- Revise Minimum Lot Sizes with sewer and water from 1 acre
to 20,000 sq. ft.
- Revise minimum lot size with either water or sewer to
25,000 sq. ft.
- Increase allowable building coverage from 10% to 15%
- Increase allowable lot coverage from 25% to 30%
• In the AV District:
- Reduce lot size w/o sewer and water from 1 acre to 20, 000
sq, ft.
- Reduce lot size with either sewer or water, or both from
20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft.
- Reduce front yard setback from 35 to 30 feet
• In the R-1 District:
- Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft.
to 15,000 sq. ft.
- Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks
for main structure are used
• In the R-2 District:
- Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft.
to 15,000 sq. ft.
- Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks
for main structure are used
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
Page 2
• In the R-3 District:
- Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft.
to 15,000 sq. ft.
- Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks
for main structure are used
• In the R-4 District:
- Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft.
to 15,000 sq. ft.
- Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks
for main structure are used
• For Townhouse developments:
- Review and revise building and lot coverage requirements
- Recommends changing the minimum lot size and building and
lot coverage.
Interior
Lot Size Ext.
Lot
Size
Bldg.
Coverage
Lot
Coverage
R-2 2000 2500 35 60
R-3 1800 2300 40 65
R-4 1600 2100 45 70
• In the Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yard provisions:
- Reduce the 10% landscaping requirement for parking areas
to 5%
• For Zero Lot Line Option:
- Change minimum side yard opposite the zero yard from 20
feet to 10 feet
• Opposed to deleting restaurant, drive-in and fast food and
convenience stores as an allowed use on property currently
zoned B-2 or B-3
ROANOKE COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ___-,
a
" ~_
"V ~ tp
C 9 ` ~ /L ~
~-~~~ ~ ~~
6
• a.OMMYN~TY ~
co-rlvazeHeus~ve
vuau
Cep
rO~vi,~c
Jt
~~,
~~~~
iu ~ is
~~ ~~
LLL ~-~~
r < < <<<
iii ~~~
101p~ p~~n~f~f
'r'ItD of ~~a
lui 0 ~ fl ?,~-~--
Ofll ^
DRAFT
PRE~'A~Z~d JUNE 1992.
PROPOSED
ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING OR
DINANCE
JUNE 15, 1992
DRAFT
THE FOLLOWING REVISED DRAFT INCORPORATES ALL OF THE
REVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE JUNE 4, 1992 ADDENDUM AND THE
MARCH 9, 1992 DRAFT OF THE PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AT THEIR MEETING ON JUNE 2, 1992,
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
AFTER HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS ON APRIL 7 AND JUNE 2, 1992.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS
SEC. 30-1 AUTHORITY AND CITATION .............................. 1
SEC. 30-2 JURISDICTION ........................................ 1
SEC. 30-3 PURPOSE ........................................... 1
SEC. 30-4 APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS ........................... 2
SEC. 30-5 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR; POWERS AND DUTIES .............. 2
SEC. 30-6 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS ........................... 3
SEC. 30-7 INTERPRETATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ................. 3
SEC. 30-8 PLANNING COMMISSION; POWERS, DUTIES, AND COMPOSITION ... 4
Sec. 30-8-1 Comprehensive Plan .............................. 4
SEC. 30-9 ZONING PERMITS ..................................... 4
Sec. 30-9-1 Building Permits; Relation to Zoning ............. 5
SEC. 30-10 Certificates of Zoning Compliance .......................... 5
Sec. 30-10-1 Temporary or Partial Certificates of Zoning Compliance ..... 6
SEC. 30-11 ...30-13 (RESERVED) ................................... 6
SEC. 30-14 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE ........................... 7
Sec. 30-14-1 Commission Study and Action ....................... 7
Sec. 30-14-2 Board Study and Action ........................... 8
Sec. 30-14-3 Posting of Property .............................. 8
Sec. 30-14-4 Posting of Property; Exemptions ..................... 9
SEC. 30-15 CONDITIONAL ZONING; GENERALLY ........................ 9
Sec. 30-15-1 Enforcement of Conditions ......................... 10
Sec. 30-15-2 Records of Conditions ............................ 11
Sec. 30-15-3 Review of Administrator's Decisions .................. 11
Sec. 30-15-4 Amendments and Variations of Conditions .............. 11
SEC. 30-16 ... SEC. 30-18 (RESERVED) ............................. 11
SEC. 30-19 SPECIAL USE PERMITS; APPLICABILITY AND PURPOSE ........... 11
Sec. 30-19-1 General Standards ............................... 11
Sec. 30-19-2 Application Requirements .......................... 12
Sec. 30-19-3 Review and Action .............................. 12
Sec. 30-19-4 Time Limitations ................................ 13
Sec. 30-34-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 54
SEC. 30-35 (RESERVED) ......................................... 55
SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT ........................... 56
Sec. 30-36-1 Purpose ...................................... 56
Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 56
Sec. 30-36-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 58
SEC. 30-37 ... 30-40 (RESERVED) ................................... 59
SEC. 30-41 R-1 LO W DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ................... 60
Sec. 30-41-1 Purpose ...................................... 60
Sec. 30-41-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 60
Sec. 30-41-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 61
SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ................ 63
Sec. 30-42-1 Purpose ...................................... 63
Sec. 30-42-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 63
Sec. 30-42-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 64
SEC. 30-43 ... 30-44 (RESERVED) ................................... 65
SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ..... 66
Sec. 30-45-1 Purpose ...................................... 66
Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 66
Sec. 30-45-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 67
SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ........ 69
Sec. 30-46-1 Purpose ...................................... 69
Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 69
Sec. 30-46-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 70
SEC. 30-47 PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT .......... 72
Sec. 30-47-1 Purpose ...................................... 72
Sec. 30-47-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 72
Sec. 30-47-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 73
Sec. 30-47-4 Relationship to Existing Development Regulations ......... 74
Sec. 30-47-5 Application Process .............................. 75
Sec. 30-47-6 Revisions to Final Master Plan ....................... 76
Sec. 30-47-7 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans .... 77
Sec. 30-47-8 Failure to Begin Development ....................... 78
Sec. 30-47-9 Control Following Approval of Final Development Plans ..... 78
Sec. 30-47-10 Existing Planned Unit Developments ................... 78
SEC. 30-48 R-MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT .......... 79
Sec. 30-48-1 Purpose ...................................... 79
Sec. 30-48-2 Permitted Uses ................................. 79
Sec. 30-48-3 Site Development Regulations ....................... 79
Sec. 30-48-4 Designation and Process for Creation of Overlay .......... 79
SEC. 30-49 RCO RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER OVERLAY DISTRICT (RESERVED) ..... 80
SEC. 30-72 AO AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT ........................100
Sec. 30-72-1 Purpose ......................................100
Sec. 30-72-2 Creation of Zones ...............................100
Sec. 30-72-3 Height Limitations ...............................101
Sec. 30-72-4 Use Restrictions ................................102
SEC. 30-73 ECO EP
Sec. 30-73-1
Sec. 30-73-2
Sec. 30-73-3
Sec. 30-73-4
Sec. 30-73-5
Sec. 30-73-6
JIERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS OVERLAY DISTRICT .......104
Purpose ......................................104
Creation of Overlay ..............................104
Emergency Communication Zones. ..................104
Height and Use Limitations .........................104
Permits ......................................104
Appeals ......................................105
SEC. 30-74 FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT ....................... 106
Sec. 30-74-1 Purpose ...................................... 106
Sec. 30-74-2 Applicability and Administration ..................... 106
Sec. 30-74-3 Compliance .................................... 107
Sec. 30-74-4 Delineation of Areas ............................. 107
Sec. 30-74-5 Creation of Overlay .............................. 108
Sec. 30-74-6 Floodplain Boundary Changes and Interpretation .......... 108
Sec. 30-74-7 Floodplain Area Provisions, Generally .................. 108
Sec. 30-74-8 Floodway Development Regulations ................... 109
Sec. 30-74-9 Flood-Fringe and Approximated Floodplain Development
Regulations .................................... 110
Sec. 30-74-10 Procedures for Special Uses in Floodways .............. 110
Sec. 30-74-11 Variances ..................................... 111
Sec. 30-74-12 Existing Structures in Floodplain Areas ................. 112
Sec. 30-74-13 Liability ...................................... 113
SEC.30-74...30-79 (RESERVED) ...................................113
ARTICLE IV USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS
SEC. 30-80 USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS .............................115
SEC. 30-81 AGRICI.
Sec. 30-81-1
Sec. 30-81-2
Sec. 30-81-3
Sec. 30-81-4
Sec. 30-81-5
Sec. 30-81-6
Sec. 30-81-7
ILTURAL AND FORESTRY USES ......................115
Agriculture ....................................115
Commercial Feedlots .............................115
Farm Employee Housing ...........................115
Forestry Operations ..............................116
Stables, Private .................................116
Stable, Commercial ..............................117
Wayside Stands ................................117
SEC. 30-82 RESIDENTIAL USES ....................................118
Sec. 30-82-1 Accessory Apartments ............................118
Sec. 30-82-2 Home Beauty/Barber Salon .........................119
Sec. 30-82-3 Home Occupations, Type I and Type II .................119
Sec. 30-82-4 Kennel, Private .................................121
Sec. 30-82-5 Manufactured Homes, Accessory ....................122
Sec. 30-82-6 Manufactured Home, Class A .......................123
v
Sec. 30-85-24 Restaurant, Drive-In or Fast Food .....................151
Sec. 30-85-25 Truck Stop ....................................151
SEC. 30-86 INDUST
Sec. 30-86-1
Sec. 30-86-2
Sec. 30-86-3
Sec. 30-86-4
Sec. 30-86-5
Sec. 30-86-6
Sec. 30-86-7
Sec. 30-86-8
Sec. 30-86-9
Sec. 30-86-10
RIALUSES .....................................152
Asphalt Plants ..................................152
Construction Yards ..............................152
Custom Manufacturing ............................153
Landfill, Construction Debris ........................153
Landfill, Rubble .................................154
Landfill, Sanitary ................................155
Recycling Centers and Stations ......................156
Resource Extraction ..............................157
Scrap and Salvage Yards ..........................157
Transfer Station ................................157
SEC. 30-87 MISCELLANEOUS USES .................................159
Sec. 30-87-1 Aviation Facilities, Private ..........................159
Sec. 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower ..............................159
Sec. 30-87-3 Outdoor Gatherings ..............................160
Sec. 30-87-4 Parking Facilities ................................160
Sec. 30-87-5 Shooting Ranges, Outdoor .........................161
SEC. 30-88 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES ...................... 162
Sec. 30-88-1 Accessory Uses: Agricultural Use Types ............... 162
Sec. 30-88-2 Accessory Uses: Residential Use Types ................ 162
Sec. 30-88-3 Accessory Uses: Civic Use Types .................... 162
Sec. 30-88-4 Accessory Uses: Office Use Types ................... 163
Sec. 30-88-5 Accessory Uses: Commercial Use Types ............... 163
Sec. 30-88-6 Accessory Uses: Industrial Use Types ................. 164
SEC. 30-89 (RESERVED) .........................................164
ARTICLE V -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SEC. 30-90 SITE DEVI
Sec. 30-90-1
Sec. 30-90-2
Sec. 30-90-3
Sec. 30-90-4
:LOPMENT PLANS ................................165
Information Required .............................165
Format of Plans .................................167
Administrative Procedures and Requirements . ............168
Minimum Standards and Improvements Required ..........169
SEC. 30-91 OFF STREET PARKING, STACKING AND LOADING .............. 170
Sec. 30-91-1 Purpose ...................................... 170
Sec. 30-91-2 General Regulations for Parking ...................... 170
Sec. 30-91-3 Spaces for Disabled Parking ........................ 170
Sec. 30-91-4 Permitted Locations .............................. 171
Sec. 30-91-5 Access ....................................... 171
Sec. 30-91-6 Construction Standards ........................... 172
Sec. 30-91-7 Parking Space Dimensions ......................... 172
Sec. 30-91-8 General Criteria for Determining Parking ................ 173
Sec. 30-91-9 Minimum Parking Required ......................... 173
Sec. 30-91-10 Stacking Spaces and Drive-Through Facilities ............ 181
Sec. 30-91-11 Off-Street Loading, Generally ....................... 182
vii
Article I
ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS
SEC. 30-1 AUTHORITY AND CITATION
General Provisions
(A) The provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to Section 15.1-486 et seq., of
the Code of Virginia, as amended. This ordinance, and all provisions contained herein, together
with the official zoning map, a copy of which is on file in the Department of Planning and Zoning,
shall be known as the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and may be cited as such, or as the
"Zoning Ordinance."
SEC. 30-2 JURISDICTION
(A) The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to all property within the unincorporated
portions of Roanoke County, Virginia, including any property within the County that may be
assessed in an adjoining jurisdiction.
SEC. 30-3 PURPOSE
(A) The zoning regulations and districts set forth in this ordinance are for the general
purpose of implementing the comprehensive plan of Roanoke County. They are designed to
achieve the general purposes of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public,
and of further accomplishing the objectives of Section 15.1-427 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended. To these ends, this ordinance is designed to give reasonable consideration to each of
the following purposes:
1. Provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety from fire, flood and
other dangers;
2. Reduce or prevent congestion in the public streets;
3. Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community;
4. Facilitate the provision of adequate police, fire protection, disaster evacuation, civil
defense, transportation, water, sewer, flood protection, schools, parks, forests,
playgrounds, recreational facilities, airports and other public requirements;
5. Protect against destruction of, or encroachment upon historic buildings or areas;
6. Protect against one or more of the following: overcrowding of land, undue density of
population in relation to the community facilities existing or available, obstruction of
light or air, hazards and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss of life, health,
or property from fire, flood, panic, or other hazards;
7. Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and
enlarge the tax base;
8. Provide, for the preservation of agricultural and forestal lands;
6/15/92
Article I
SEC. 30-6 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS
(A) The following are established as Roanoke County zoning districts:
Agricultural Districts
AG-3 Agriculture/Rural Preserve District
AG-1 Agriculture/Rural Low Density District
AR Agriculture/Residential District
AV Village Center District
Residential Districts
R-1 Low Density Residential District
R-2 Medium Density Residential District
R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District
R-4 High Density Multi-Family Residential District
PRD Planned Residential Development District
R-MH Manufactured Home Overlay District
RCO Residential Cluster Overlay District (Reserved)
Commercial Districts
NC Neighborhood Commercial District
C-1 Office District
C-2 General Commercial District
INT Interchange District (Reserved)
PCD Planned Commercial Development District (Reserved)
Industrial Districts
I-1 Industrial District
I-2 Industrial District
PID Planned Industrial Development District (Reserved)
Special Purpose Districts
EP Explore Park District
AO Airport Overlay District
ECO Emergency Communications Overlay District
FO Floodplain Overlay District
General Provisions
The location and boundaries of these zoning districts are shown on the official zoning map.
SEC. 30-7 INTERPRETATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
(A) Where uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of districts shown on the official zoning
map, the following rules shall apply:
1. Boundaries indicated as approximately following the center lines of streets, right-of-
ways, or alleys shall be construed to follow such center lines;
3 6/15/92
Article I
General Provisions
2. Fences, provided their location and design conforms to Section 30-100-8 and Section
30-100-9 of this ordinance.
(B) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide any information necessary for
the Administrator to determine that the proposed use, building, or structure complies with all
provisions of this ordinance.
(C) For any use, building, or structure requiring an approved site development plan, no
zoning permit shall be issued, until such time as a site development plan is submitted, reviewed
and approved in accordance with Section 30-90 of this ordinance.
(D) For uses or structures not requiring an approved site development plan, the
Administrator shall determine, in accord with this ordinance, the type of information necessary to
review the permit. At a minimum, a plot plan shall be required meeting the standards contained
in Section 30-100-1 of this Ordinance.
(E) All zoning permits issued shall be valid for a period of six months, unless the structure,
use or activity for which the permit was issued has commenced. The Administrator may reissue
any expired permit provided the structure, use and or activity complies with all applicable
provisions of the ordinance at the time of reissuance.
(F) The Administrator shall have the authority to approve the form and content of zoning
permit applications.
Sec. 30-9-1 Building Permits; Relation to Zoning
(A) No building permit for the extension, erection, or alteration of any building or structure
shall be issued before an application has been made, and a zoning permit issued. No building or
structure shall be occupied or used until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued.
SEC. 30-10 Certificates of Zoning Compliance
(A) A certificate of zoning compliance shall be required for any of the following:
1. Occupancy or use of a building hereafter erected, enlarged or structurally altered.
2. Change in the use or occupancy of an existing building.
3. Occupancy or change in the use of vacant land except for the raising of crops, and
other agricultural uses not involving structures.
4. Any change in use of a nonconforming use, or any alteration of a nonconforming
building or structure.
(B) No such occupancy, use, or change in use shall take place until a certificate of zoning
compliance has been issued by the County. Such certificate shall certify that the building or the
proposed use, or the use of the land, complies with the provisions of this ordinance. Upon
application of the owner or an authorized agent, the County shall issue the certificate of zoning
5 6/15/92
Article I
General Provisions
SEC. 30-14 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE
(A) Whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice
require, the Board may, by ordinance, amend, supplement, or change these regulations, district
boundaries, or classifications of property. Any such amendments may be initiated by:
1. Resolution of the Board, or;
2. Motion of the Commission, or;
3. Petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's written consent, or the
owner's agent thereof, of the property which is the subject of the proposed zoning
map amendment.
Any petition submitted shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Administrator, Board
or Commission.
(B) The Administrator shall establish and maintain the amendment application materials.
These application materials shall, at a minimum, include any information the Administrator deems
necessary for the Commission and Board to adequately evaluate the amendment request. A
concept plan shall accompany all map amendment requests. Standards for concept plans are
found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Department of
Engineering and Inspections.
(C) The Administrator shall not accept any amendment application for a lot or parcel that
does not comply with the minimum lot area, width, or frontage requirements of the requested
zoning district. In such situations, the applicant shall first seek a variance from the Board of
Zoning Appeals. If a variance is granted, the Administrator shall thereafter accept the amendment
application for the consideration of the Commission and Board.
(D) If any amendment application is withdrawn at the request of the applicant subsequent
to the Commission's recommendation on the application, or if the Board denies any amendment
application submitted for its review, the County shall not consider substantially the same
application for the same property within one year of the application's withdrawal or the Board's
action. The Administrator shall have the authority to determine whether new applications
submitted within this one year period are substantially the same. In making any such
determination the Administrator shall have the authority to consider any items pertaining to the
proposed use or development of the site such as, but not limited to, the uses proposed, densities,
access, building locations, and overall site design.
Sec. 30-14-1 Commission Study and Action
(A) All proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance shall be referred by the Board to the
Commission for study and recommendation. The Commission shall study proposals to determine:
1. The need and justification for the change.
7 6/15/92
Article I General Provisions
(B) At least 14 days prior to the Commission's public hearing on the pending application,
the applicant shall erect on the subject property, signs provided by the Administrator, indicating
the change proposed, and the date, time, and place of the public hearing. Failure to do so shall
result in the cancellation or continuation the scheduled public hearing. The applicant shall be
responsible for all advertising costs associated with rescheduling the public hearing.
(C) The Administrator shall determine the number of signs required, however, there shall
be at least one sign posted along each public right of way abutting the property. At least one sign
shall be posted every 300 feet along any single right-of-way. For properties that lack any public
right-of-way, all required signs shall be posted along at least two property lines, as determined by
the Administrator.
(D) The applicant shall have the responsibility to determine and provide the structural
elements necessary to erect the sign on the property. All signs erected must be posted within ten
feet of the adjacent right of way, and must be clearly visible from same.
(E) The applicant shall have the responsibility of protecting the signs from the elements to
ensure that the sign is in place and legible through the date of the public hearing. If any sign is
damaged due to the elements, such that the pertinent information on the sign is unreadable, the
public hearing may be rescheduled or continued. The applicant shall be responsible for all
advertising costs associated with rescheduling the public hearing.
(F) All public hearing signs posted shall be removed from the property by the applicant
within 14 days after the Commission's public hearing.
Sec. 30-14-4 Posting of Property; Exemptions
(A) The following exemptions shall apply to the provisions of Section 30-14-3:
1. The posting of property shall not be required for any action initiated by a resolution of
the Board, if the action encompasses more than twenty-six parcels of land.
2. Vandalism or unauthorized removal of the signs prior to the Commission hearing shall
not violate the public notice intent of Section 30-14-3. The Administrator shall have
the responsibility for determining whether or not the signs have been vandalized.
SEC. 30-15 CONDITIONAL ZONING; GENERALLY
(A) In accordance with the authority granted to Roanoke County per 15.1-491.2:1 of the
Code of Virginia, as amended, the owner of property for which an amendment is requested may
voluntarily proffer in writing reasonable conditions, in addition to the applicable regulations for the
requested zoning district. All proffered conditions must be signed by the owner of the property.
(B) Roanoke County's acceptance of proffers pursuant to this authority shall be in accord
with the procedures and standards contained in 15.1-491.2:1.
9 6/15/92
Article I
Sec. 30-15-2 Records of Conditions
General Provisions
(A) The zoning map shall show by an appropriate symbol on the map the existence of
conditions attached to the zoning on the map. The Administrator shall keep and make available
for public inspection a conditional zoning index. The index shall provide ready access to the
ordinance creating the conditions in addition to the regulations provided for in a particular zoning
district or zone.
Sec. 30-15-3 Review of Administrator's Decisions
(A) Any zoning applicant, or any other person aggrieved by a decision of the Administrator
made pursuant to the provisions of Section 30-15, may petition the Board for the review of the
decision of the Administrator. All such petitions for review shall be filed with the Administrator
within thirty days from the date of the decision for which review is sought. All such petitions shall
specify the grounds upon which the petitioner is aggrieved.
Sec. 30-15-4 Amendments and Variations of Conditions
(A) Any request by an applicant to amend conditions that were voluntarily proffered and
accepted by the Board shall be considered an amendment to the zoning ordinance, and shall be
reviewed pursuant to the provisions contained in Section 30-14.
(B) There shall be no amendment or variation of conditions created pursuant to the
provisions of this ordinance until after a public hearing by the Commission and Board advertised
pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The cost of
all public advertisements shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
SEC. 30-16 ... SEC. 30-18 (RESERVED)
SEC. 30-19 SPECIAL USE PERMITS; APPLICABILITY AND PURPOSE
(A) The procedures and standards contained in this section shall apply to afl uses
specifically permitted as special uses in the district regulations found elsewhere in this ordinance.
(B) This category of uses known as special uses is established in recognition that in
addition to uses permitted by right, certain uses may, depending upon their scale, design, location,
and conditions imposed by the Board, be compatible with existing and future uses in a district.
(C) The review and subsequent approval or disapproval of a special use permit by the Board
shall be considered a legislative act, and shall be governed by the procedures thereof.
Sec. 30-19-1 General Standards
(A) No special use permit shall be issued except upon a finding of the Board that in addition
to conformity with any standards set forth in Article IV Use and Design Standards, the proposed
special use conforms with the following general standards. These standards shall be met either
by the proposal made in the original special use permit application, or by the proposal as modified
or amended as part of the review of the application by the Commission and the Board:
1 1 6/15/92
Article I General Provisions
(B) The Commission shall review and make recommendations to the Board concerning the
approval or disapproval of any special use permit. No such recommendation shall be made until
after a public hearing is held in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended. Posting of the property shall be in accord with Section 30-14-3 of this ordinance. The
Commission shall base its recommendation upon the review of the submitted application materials,
the specific and general criteria for the special use, public comment received at the hearing, and
the information and evaluation of the Department of Planning and Zoning. In making a
recommendation to the Board, the Commission may recommend any conditions necessary to
insure that the proposal meets the specific and general standards for the proposed use. Any such
conditions shall be related to the design, scale, use, or operation of the proposed special use.
Where warranted, for the purpose of compliance with the general standards for special uses, such
conditions may exceed the specific standards for the use found elsewhere in this ordinance.
(C) The Board may grant or deny any applicant a special use permit after notice is given
and a public hearing is held in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended. No action on any special use permit shall be taken until the Board has received the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. In granting a special use permit, the Board may
attach any conditions necessary to insure that the proposal meets the specific and general
standards for the proposed use. Any such conditions shall be related to the design, scale, use,
or operation of the proposed special use. Where warranted, for the purpose of compliance with
the general standards for special uses, such conditions may exceed the specific standards for the
use found elsewhere in this ordinance.
Sec. 30-19-4 Time Limitations
(A) Within ninety days from the date that the proposed special use permit application is
referred to the Commission, unless a longer period shall have been established by mutual
agreement between the Board and the Commission in a particular case, the Commission shall
review the proposed application and report its findings and recommendation to the Board along
with any appropriate explanatory materials. Failure of the Commission to report to the Board
within ninety days shall be deemed a recommendation of approval. If the Commission does not
report within ninety days, the Board may act on the application without the recommendation of
the Commission.
(B) The Board shall hold a public hearing and approve or deny any special use permit
application within twelve months after receiving the Commission's recommendation. Failure to
act on any permit within this twelve month period shall be deemed denial of the permit.
(C) Any special use permit granted shall be null and void two years after approval by the
Board if the use or development authorized by the permit is not commenced to a degree that, in
the opinion of the Administrator, clearly establishes the intent to utilize the granted special use
permit in a period of time deemed reasonable for the type and scope of improvements involved.
(D) Special uses which are approved by the Board shall run with the land, except that
1. Activities or uses approved by a special use permit which are discontinued for a period
of more than two consecutive years shall not be reestablished on the same property
unless a new special use permit is issued in accord with this ordinance.
13 6/15/92
Article I
General Provisions
1. Section 30-93, Signs; except for provisions relating to the posting of signs on public
property, or public rights-of-way.
2. (RESERVED)
(B) Each day during which any violation of the provisions scheduled above is found to have
existed shall constitute a separate offense. However, in no event shall any such violation arising
from the same set of operative facts be charged more frequently than once in any ten (10) day
period, nor shall any such violation arising from the same set of operative facts result in civil
penalties which exceed a total of three thousand dollars (53000.00).
(C) The designation of a particular violation of this ordinance as an infraction under this
section shall preclude the prosecution of such as a criminal misdemeanor, except for any violation
resulting in injury to any person or persons, which may be so prosecuted as well.
(D) The Administrator shall notify by summons a person committing or suffering the
existence of an infraction by certified, return receipt requested mail, of the infraction. The
Roanoke County Sheriff's Office may also deliver the summons. The summons shall contain the
following information:
1. The name and address of the person charged.
2. The nature of the infraction and the ordinance provision(s) being violated.
3. The location, date, and time that the infraction occurred, or was observed.
4. The amount of the civil penalty assessed for the infraction.
5. The manner, location, and time that the civil penalty may be paid to the County.
6. The right of the recipient of the summons to elect to stand trial for the infraction and
the date of such trial.
(E) The summons shall provide that any person summoned for a violation may, within
fourteen (14) days from the date of mailing of the summons, elect to pay the civil penalty by
making an appearance in person, or in writing by mail to the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office
at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the time and date fixed for trial and, by such appearance,
may enter a waiver of trial, admit liability, and pay the civil penalty established for the violation
charged. Such summons shall inform the persons summoned of their right to stand trial for the
violation charged and provide that a signature to an admission of liability shall have the same force
and effect as a judgement in court; however, an admission shall not be deemed a criminal
conviction for any purpose.
(F) If a person charged with a violation does not elect to enter a waiver of trial and admit
liability, the County shall cause the Sheriff of Roanoke County to serve the summons on the
person charged in the manner prescribed by law. The violation shall be tried in General District
Court in the same manner and with the same right of appeal as provided for in Title 8.01 of the
Code of Virginia. In any trial for a scheduled violation authorized by this section, it shall be the
15 6/15/92
Article I
General Provisions
2. The use is not converted or replaced, in whole or in part, by a use permitted in the
district regulations, or;
3. The buildings or structures containing the. nonconforming use are maintained in their
then structural condition.
If buildings or structures containing a nonconforming use are enlarged, extended,
reconstructed, or structurally altered, or if a nonconforming use of land is enlarged or expanded
in area, the use of the building, structure or land shall legally conform to the regulations of the
zoning district in which they are located.
(B) No nonconforming use shall be enlarged, intensified or increased, nor intensified to
occupy a larger structure or building than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or
subsequent amendment of this ordinance.
(C) No nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any portion of the lot or
parcel unoccupied by such use at the time of the adoption or subsequent amendment of this
ordinance.
(D) No building or structure not conforming to the requirements of this ordinance shall be
erected in connection with the nonconforming use of land.
(E) Where nonconforming use status applies to a building or structure, removal of the
building or structure, or damage from any cause to an extent of more than fifty percent of
replacement cost at the time of the damage shall eliminate the nonconforming status of the
building or structure or land.
(F) Any legally established use which existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, or any
subsequent amendments, shall nQt be considered a nonconforming use where a special use permit
is now required for establishment of such use. The use shall be allowed to continue operation,
as well as reconstruct or structural alter the building or structure without the necessity of
obtaining a special use permit. However, approval of a special use permit shall be required for any
future expansion, extension or enlargement of the use or structure.
Sec. 30-23-3 Nonconforming Buildings and Structures
(A) Where a lawful building or structure, exists at the time of passage or amendment of
this ordinance, which could not be built under the terms of this ordinance by reason of restrictions
on area, bulk, lot coverage, height, yards, or other characteristics of the building or structure, or
its location on a lot, such building or structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise
lawful provided:
1. No building or structure shall be enlarged in any way which increases or extends its
nonconformity.
2. Any building or structure which is damaged by any means to an extent of more than
fifty percent of its replacement cost at the time of damage, shall be reconstructed only
in conformity with the provisions of this chapter.
17 6/15/92
Article I
General Provisions
1. A property owner acquired the property in good faith and where by reason of the
exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of the property at the time of the
adoption of this ordinance, or where by reason of exceptional topographic conditions
or other extraordinary situation or condition of the property, the strict application of
this ordinance would effectively prohibit, or unreasonably restrict the use of the
property, or;
2. Due to the condition, situation, or development of immediately adjacent property, the
strict application of this ordinance would effectively prohibit, or unreasonably restrict
the use of the property, or;
3. That the granting of the variance will alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship
approaching confiscation, as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience
sought by the applicant.
All variances granted must be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of this
ordinance. Specifically, the BZA must find that the strict application of the ordinance would
produce undue hardship. This hardship must not be shared by other properties in the same zoning
district and in the same vicinity. The BZA must find that the granting of the variance will not be
of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be
changed by the granting of the variance. Finally, the BZA must not grant a variance unless it finds
that the condition or situation of the property is not so general or recurring a nature as to make
reasonably practical the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an amendment to this
ordinance.
No variance request shall be evaluated by the BZA until after notice and hearing as provided
by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. In addition, posting of the property
shall be required as provided for in Section 30-14-3 of this ordinance.
In granting a variance, the BZA may impose such conditions regarding the location, character
and other features of the proposed structure or use as it may deem necessary in the public
interest, and may require a guarantee or bond to ensure that the conditions imposed are being and
will continue to be complied with.
(C) The BZA shall have the power and duty to hear and decide appeals from any written
decision of the Administrator. No such appeal shall be heard except after notice and hearing as
provided by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended.
(D) The BZA shall have the power and duty to hear and decide applications for
interpretation of the official zoning map where the Administrator believes there is uncertainty as
to the location of a district boundary. No such determination shall be made except after notice
and hearing as provided by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. Any property
owner affected by a determination of the location of the boundary must be notified by first class
mail prior to any such determination. After notice and hearing the BZA may interpret the map in
such a way to carry out the intent and purpose of this ordinance, however the BZA shall not have
the power to change substantially the locations of the district boundaries as established by this
ordinance. This authority of the BZA to determine the location of district boundaries shall not be
construed as the power to rezone property.
19 6/15/92
Article I General Provisions
Sec. 30-24-5 Certiorari to Review Decision of BZA
(A) Any person jointly or separately aggrieved by any decision of the BZA, or any taxpayer
or any officer, department, board or bureau of the County, may present to the circuit court of the
County a petition specifying the grounds on which aggrieved. This petition must be filed within
30 days of the BZA's decision.
(B) Upon the presentation of such petition, the court shall allow a writ of certiorari to
review the decision of the BZA and shall prescribe therein the time within which a return thereto
must be made and served upon the relator's attorney, which shall not be less than ten days and
may be extended by the court. The allowance of the writ shall not stay proceedings upon the
decision appealed from, but the court may, on application, on notice to the BZA and on due cause
shown, grant a restraining order.
lC) The BZA shall not be required to return the original papers acted upon by it but it shall
be sufficient to return certified or sworn copies thereof or of such portions thereof as may be
called for by such writ. The return shall concisely set forth such other facts as may be pertinent
and material to show the grounds appealed from and shall be verified.
(D) If upon the hearing, it shall appear to the court that testimony is necessary for the
proper disposition of the matter, it may take evidence or appoint a commissioner to take such
evidence as it may direct, and report the same to the court with his findings of fact and
conclusions of law, which shall constitute a part of the proceedings upon which the determination
of the court shall be made. The court may reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or may modify the
decision brought up for review.
(E) Costs shall not be allowed against the BZA, unless it shall appear to the court that it
acted in bad faith or with malice in making the decision appealed from. In the event the decision
of the BZA is affirmed, and the court finds that the appeal was frivolous, the court may order the
person or persons who requested the issuance of the writ of certiorari to pay the costs incurred
in making a return of the record pursuant to the writ of certiorari.
SEC.30-25...30-27 (RESERVED)
21 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Definitions
ARTICLE 11 DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES
SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS
(A) The following rules for general construction of language shall apply to this ordinance:
The specific shall control the general.
The word "person" includes a "firm, association, organization, partnership, trust, company,"
as well as an "individual."
Any words pertaining to gender shall be interchangeable. The word "he" shall mean "she",
and "she" shall mean "he".
The words "used" or "occupied" include the words "intended, designed, or arranged to be
used or occupied."
The word "lot" includes the words "plot" or "parcel."
The present tense includes the future tense; the singular number includes the plural; the plural
number includes the singular.
The word "shall" is mandatory; the word "may" or "should" is permissive.
All public officials, bodies, and agencies referred to in this ordinance are those of Roanoke
County, Virginia, unless otherwise specifically indicated.
(B) Where terms are not defined, they shall have their ordinarily accepted meaning, or such
as the context may imply.
(C) For the purposes of this ordinance, the words and phrases listed below in this section
shall have the meanings described below.
ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE - A building or structure detached from a principal
building on the same lot and customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal building
or use. Where an accessory building or structure is attached to the principal building in a
substantial manner, as by a wall or roof, such accessory building shall be considered a part
of the principal building.
ACCESSORY USE - A use of land or a building or structure or portion thereof customarily
incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the land or building or structure and located
on the same lot with such principal use.
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SIGN -Any sign displayed for the purpose of advertising
agricultural products produced on the premises where the sign is displayed.
23 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Definitions
BUILDING LINE -The line, parallel to the street right-of-way, that passes through the point of
the principal building nearest the street right-of-way, or in the case of the rear building line,
furthest from the street right-of-way.
BUSINESS SIGN - A sign which directs attention to a profession or business conducted, or
to a commodity, service activity or entertainment sold or offered, upon the premises where
the sign is located, or in the building to which the sign is affixed.
CAMPSITE - A designated plot of ground within a campground intended or used for the
exclusive occupancy by a tent, recreational vehicle, or a vacation cottage.
CELLAR - A story having more than one-half of its height below average adjoining grade on
all sides of the building or structure.
CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE -For the purposes of this ordinance, official
certification that premises conform to all applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance and
may be lawfully used or occupied.
CLUSTER - A development design technique that concentrates buildings in specific areas on
the site to allow the remaining land to be used for recreation, common open space, and
preservation of environmentally-sensitive features.
COMMERCIAL DELIVERY -The delivery of goods, products, materials, or other items
associated with a home occupation by any means other than that which would normally
deliver to a residential neighborhood (i.e. U. S. Postal Service, UPS, Federal Express, etc.)
COMMISSION -The term Commission shall mean the Planning Commission of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
CONDOMINIUM - A building or group of buildings, created pursuant to Virginia Condominium
Act of 1974, Section 55-79.39 et seq., Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, in which units
are owned individually, and the structure, common areas and facilities are owned by all the
owners on a proportional, undivided basis.
CONSTRUCTION SIGN - A temporary sign identifying an architect, developer, builder, general
contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, and or financing entity participating in
construction on the property on which the sign is located.
COUNTY -Shall mean Roanoke County, Virginia.
DECK - A structure, without a roof, directly adjacent to a principal building which has an
average elevation of 30 inches or greater from finished grade. A deck may be constructed
of any materials.
DEDICATION -The transfer of private property to public ownership upon written acceptance.
25 6/15/92
ARTICLE II Definitions
FRONTAGE WIDTH - (See Lot, Frontage)
GARAGE, PRIVATE - A building for the private use of the owner or occupant of a principal
building situated on the same lot as the principal building for the storage of motor vehicles.
No facilities for mechanical service or repair of a commercial nature shall be permitted in a
private garage.
GLARE -The effect produced by brightness sufficient to cause annoyance, discomfort, or loss
in visual performance and visibility.
HISTORIC SITE SIGNS - A sign erected and maintained by a public agency, or non-profit
historical society, that identifies the location of, and provides information about, a historic
place or event.
HOME OCCUPATION SIGN - A sign associated with home occupation uses as provided for
elsewhere in this ordinance.
HOUSEHOLD PET -Animals that are kept for personal use or enjoyment within the home.
Household pet shall include but is not limited to dogs, cats, birds, and rodents.
IDENTIFICATION SIGN - A permanent on-premises sign displaying only the name of a
subdivision, multi-family housing project, shopping center, industrial park, office park, church,
school, public or quasi-public facility or similar type use.
ILLUMINATED SIGN -Any sign with an artificial light source incorporated internally or
externally for the purpose of illuminating the sign.
LANDSCAPING -The improvement of the appearance of an area by the planting of trees,
grass, shrubs, or other plant materials, or by the alteration of the contours of the ground.
LOADING SPACE, OFF-STREET -Space for bulk pick-ups and deliveries, scaled to delivery
vehicles expected to be used, and accessible to such vehicles when required off-street parking
spaces are filled.
LOT - A parcel of land intended to be separately owned, developed, or otherwise used as a
unit, established by plat, subdivisions or as otherwise permitted by law.
LOT, CORNER -A lot located at the intersection of two or more streets or where lot lines or
right-of-way lines, or the extension thereof, intersect at less than 135 degrees.
LOT COVERAGE -That portion of a lot, which when viewed from directly above, would be
covered by any building or structure, parking and loading areas and other surface which is
impermeable or substantially impervious to storm water. Gravel parking areas shall be
considered impervious. For the purposes of this definition, lot shall include contiguous lots
of the same ownership within a single zoning district which are to be used, developed or built
upon as a unit.
27 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Definitions
NATURAL WATERCOURSE -Any natural stream river, creek, waterway, gully, or wash in
which water flows in a definite direction or course, either continuously or intermittently, and
has a definite channel, bed and banks.
NONCONFORMING BUILDING -Any building the size, dimensions or location of which was
lawful when erected or altered, but which fails to conform to the current standards and
regulations due to the adoption, revision or amendment of this ordinance.
NONCONFORMING LOT - A lot, the area, dimensions or location of which was lawful at the
time the lot was created, but which fails to conform to the current standards and regulations
due to the adoption, revision or amendment of this ordinance.
NONCONFORMING USE - A use or activity which was lawful when originally established, but
which fails to conform to the current standards and regulations due to the adoption, revision
or amendment of this ordinance.
NOT-FOR-PROFIT - An organization or activity which has obtained non taxable status from
the U. S. Internal Revenue Service.
OFF-PREMISES SIGN -Any sign which directs attention to a message, or business,
commodity, activity, service or product not conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises
where the sign is located. These signs may also be known as location signs, billboards,
outdoor advertising signs, or general advertising signs.
OFF-STREET PARKING AREA -Space provided for vehicular parking outside the dedicated
street right-of-way.
ON-PREMISES SIGN -Any sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, activity,
service or product conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises where the sign is located.
OPEN SPACE -Any parcel or area of land or water essentially unimproved and set aside,
dedicated or reserved for public or private use or enjoyment, or for the use and enjoyment of
owners and occupants of land adjoining or neighboring such open space. Open Space may
include, recreation centers, swimming pools, tennis and basketball courts, and similar
facilities.
OPEN SPACE, COMMON -Land within or related to a development, not individually owned
or dedicated for public use, which is intended for the common use or enjoyment of the
residents of the development and may include such complementary structures as are
necessary and appropriate. Open Space may include, recreation centers, swimming pools,
tennis and basketball courts, and similar facilities.
OUTDOOR STORAGE -The keeping, in other than a building, of any goods, materials, or
merchandise on the same parcel for more than twenty-four consecutive hours.
OVERLAY DISTRICT - A district established by this Ordinance to prescribe special regulations
to be applied to a site in combination with the underlying or base district.
29 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Definitions
REPLACEMENT COST - The cost of restoring a damaged building or structure to its original
condition. Replacement cost shall include reasonable estimates of the cost of materials and
labor and shall be compared with the assessed value as determined by the County Assessor
to determine the percentage of the cost of improvements.
RIGHT-OF-WAY - A legally established area or strip of land, either public or private, on which
an irrevocable right of passage has been recorded, and which is occupied or intended to be
occupied by a street, utility service, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, or other similar
use.
SCREENING - A method of visually shielding or obscuring one abutting or nearby structure or
use from another by fencing, walls, berms or densely planted vegetation. Screening is
intended to substantially, but not necessarily totally obscure visual impacts between adjoining
uses.
SERVICE AREA, URBAN AND RURAL -Those areas designated in the Roanoke County
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, as either the urban service area or the rural service area.
SETBACK -The minimum distance by which any building or structure must be separated from
a street right-of-way or lot line.
SHOPPING CENTER - A group of commercial establishments planned, constructed and
managed as a total entity with shared access, customer and employee parking provided on-
site, provision of goods delivery separated from customer access, aesthetic considerations and
protection from the elements.
SIGN -Any device, structure, fixture or placard using graphics, symbols, and/or written copy
designed specifically for the purpose of advertising or identifying any establishment, product,
goods, service, or activity.
SIGN HEIGHT -The vertical distance measured from grade to the highest portion of the sign
or sign structure.
SIGN SETBACK -The minimum distance required between any property line and any portion
of a sign or sign structure.
SIGN STRUCTURE -The supports, uprights, bracing or framework of any structure exhibiting
a sign, be it single faced, double faced, v-type or otherwise.
SPECIAL USE - A use with operating and/or physical characteristics different from those uses
permitted by right in a given zoning district which may, nonetheless, be compatible with those
by right uses under special conditions and with adequate public review. Special uses are
allowed only at the discretion and approval of the Board of Supervisors, following review and
recommendation by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 30-19.
STOOP - A platform, without a roof, located at the entrance of a building with sufficient area
to facilitate the ingress and egress to the building.
31 6/15/92
ARTICLE II Use Types
SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY
(A) The purpose of the Use Types is to establish a classification system for land uses and
a consistent set of terms defining uses permitted within various zoning districts. The Use Types
section also facilitates the process of determining the applicable use type of any activity not
clearly within any defined use type.
(B) In the event of any question as to the appropriate use type of any existing or proposed
use or activity, the Administrator shall have the authority to determine the appropriate use type.
In making such determination, the Administrator shall consider the operational and physical
characteristics of the use in question and shall consider the classification contained in the most
recent edition of the Standard Industrial Classification Manual published by the U. S. Office of
Management and Budget. In addition, the Administrator shall consider the specific requirements
of the use in common with those included as examples of use types. Those examples, when
included in use type descriptions, are intended to be illustrative, as opposed to exclusive lists. The
Administrator may also determine that a proposed use or activity is sufficiently different from any
use type listed below and will require an amendment to the text of this ordinance.
(C) The Administrator shall make such determinations of appropriate use types in writing,
which shall include an explanation of the reasons for the determination.
(D) A determination of the Administrator maybe appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals
pursuant to the procedures for administrative appeals outlined in Section 30-24.
Sec. 30-29-1 Agricultural and Forestry Use Tvaes
AGRICULTURE -The use of land for the production of food and fibre, including farming,
dairying, pasturage, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, and animal and poultry husbandry.
A garden accessory to a residence shall not be considered agriculture.
COMMERCIAL FEEDLOTS - A site where animals are stabled or confined and fed or
maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12 month period, and where the number of
animals so confined include more than 300 slaughter or feeder cattle, 200 mature dairy cattle,
750 swine, 150 horses, or 30,000 laying hens or broilers, or any other site designated by the
Virginia Water Control Board as a "concentrated or intensified animal feeding operation"
pursuant to the Permit Regulations for Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System and
Virginia Pollution Abatement Permit Programs.
FARM EMPLOYEE HOUSING - A dwelling located on a farm for the purpose of housing an
employee of that farm operation and his/her family. Also included in this use type would be
multi-family dwelling(s) for seasonal employees in connection with an orchard or other
agricultural use which relies on seasonal employees who must be housed.
FORESTRY OPERATIONS -The use of land for the raising and harvesting of timber, pulp
woods and other forestry products for commercial purposes, including the temporary
operation of a sawmill and/or chipper to process the timber cut from that parcel or contiguous
parcels. Excluded from this definition shall be the cutting of timber associated with land
33 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Use Types
MANUFACTURED HOME, CLASS B -A traditional single ormulti-sectional manufactured home
constructed after July 1, 1976, that meets or exceeds the Manufactured Home Construction
and Safety Standards, promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development but that otherwise dyes not meet all of the criteria of a Class A, design
restricted manufactured home.
MANUFACTURED HOME, CLASS C - A manufactured home constructed before July 1, 1976,
and consequently does not meet the criteria of a Class A or Class B manufactured home.
MANUFACTURED HOME, EMERGENCY - A Class B manufactured home used temporarily for
the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by
fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally
declared disaster in accordance with Section 30-82-8.
MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION - A five acre or larger community of manufactured
home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership.
MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A five acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate
a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership.
A manufactured home park is also referred to as a mobile home park.
MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING - A building or portion thereof which contains three or more
dwelling units for permanent occupancy, regardless of the method of ownership. Included in
the use type would be garden apartments, low and high rise apartments, apartments for
elderly housing and condominiums.
RESIDENTIAL HUMAN CARE FACILITY - A building used as a family care home, foster home,
or group home serving not more than 8 mentally retarded or other developmentally disabled
persons, not related by blood or marriage, pursuant to Section 15.1-486-3 of the Code of
Virginia, as amended. Excluded from this definition are drug or alcohol rehabilitation centers,
half-way houses and similar uses.
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - A site built or modular building designed for or used exclusively
as one dwelling unit for permanent occupancy.
DETACHED: A single family dwelling which is surrounded by open space or yards on
all sides, is located on its own individual lot, and which is not attached to any other
dwelling by any means.
ATTACHED: Two single family dwellings sharing a common wall area, each on its own
individual lot.
TOWNHOUSE - A grouping of three or more attached single family dwellings in a row in which
each unit has its own front and rear access to the outside, no unit is located over another
unit, and each unit is separated from any other unit by one or more common walls.
TWO FAMILY DWELLING -The use of an individual lot for two dwelling units which share at
least one common wall, each occupied by one family.
35 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Use Types
FAMILY DAY CARE HOME - A single family dwelling in which more than five but less than
10 individuals, are received for care, protection and guidance during only part of atwenty-four
hour day. Individuals related by blood, legal adoption or marriage to the person who maintains
the home shall be excluded provided the total number of individuals at any time does not
exceed 9. The care of 5 or less individuals for portions of a day shall be considered as a
home occupation.
GUIDANCE SERVICES -A use providing counseling, guidance, recuperative, or similar services
for persons requiring rehabilitation assistance as a result of mental illness, alcoholism,
detention, drug addiction, or similar conditions for only part of a twenty-four hour day.
HALFWAY HOUSE - An establishment providing accommodations, rehabilitation, counseling,
and supervision to persons suffering from alcohol or drug addiction, to persons re-entering
society after being released from a correctional facility or other institution, or to persons
suffering from similar disorders.
HOME FOR ADULTS - An establishment that provides shelter and services which may include
meals, housekeeping, and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are
usually functionally impaired and socially isolated but otherwise in good health. They are able
to maintain asemi-independent life style, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing
home.
LIFE CARE FACILITY - A residential facility primarily for the continuing care of the elderly,
providing for transitional housing progressing from independent living in various dwelling units,
with or without kitchen facilities, and culminating in nursing home type care where all related
uses are located on the same lot. Such facility may include other services integral to the
personal and therapeutic care of the residents.
NURSING HOME - A use providing bed care and in-patient services for persons requiring
regular medical attention but excluding a facility providing surgical or emergency medical
services and excluding a facility providing care for alcoholism, drug addiction, mental disease,
or communicable disease.
PARK AND RIDE FACILITY- A publicly owned, short-term, parking facility for commuters.
POST OFFICE -Postal services directly available to the consumer operated by the United
States Postal Service.
PUBLIC ASSEMBLY -Facilities owned and operated by a public or quasi-public agency
accommodating public assembly for sports, amusement, or entertainment purposes. Typical
uses include auditoriums, sports stadiums, convention facilities, fairgrounds, and incidental
sales and exhibition facilities.
PUBLIC MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FACILITIES - A public facility supporting maintenance,
repair, vehicular or equipment servicing, material storage, and similar activities including street
or sewer yards, equipment services centers, and similar uses having characteristics of
commercial services or contracting or industrial activities.
37 6/15/92
ARTICLE II Use Types
Sec. 30-29-5 Commercial Use Tvnes
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES - An establishment primarily engaged in providing services
specifically for the agricultural community which is not directly associated with a farm
operation. Included in this use type would be servicing of agricultural equipment, independent
equipment operators, and other related agricultural services.
ANTIQUE SHOPS - A place offering only antiques for sale. An antique for the purposes of
this ordinance shall be a work of art, piece of furniture, decorative object, or the like, of or
belonging to the past, at least 30 years old.
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, NEW -The use of any building, land area or other premise for the
display of new and used automobiles, trucks, vans, or motorcycles for sale or rent, including
any warranty repair work and other major and minor repair service conducted as an accessory
use.
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, USED -Any lot or establishment where three or more used motor
vehicles, including automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles are displayed at one time for sale.
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR SERVICES, MAJOR -Repair of construction equipment, commercial
trucks, agricultural implements and similar heavy equipment, including automobiles, where
major engine and transmission repairs are conducted. Typical uses include automobile and
truck repair garages, transmission shops, radiator shops, body and fender shops, equipment
service centers, machine shops and other similar uses where major repair activities are
conducted.
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR SERVICES, MINOR -Repair of automobiles, noncommercial trucks,
motorcycles, motor homes, recreational vehicles, or boats, including the sale, installation, and
servicing of equipment and parts. Typical uses include tire sales and installation, wheel and
brake shops, oil and lubrication services and similar repair and service activities where minor
repairs and routine maintenance are conducted.
AUTOMOBILE RENTAL/LEASING -Rental of automobiles and light trucks and vans, including
incidental parking and servicing of vehicles for rent or lease. Typical uses include auto rental
agencies and taxicab dispatch areas.
AUTOMOBILE PARTS/SUPPLY, RETAIL -Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories.
Typical uses include automobile parts and supply stores which offer new and factory rebuilt
parts and accessories, and include establishments which offer minor automobile repair
services.
BED AND BREAKFAST - An owner-occupied dwelling in which not more than 5 bedrooms are
provided for overnight guests for compensation, on daily or weekly basis, with or without
meals.
BOARDING HOUSE - A dwelling unit, or part thereof, in which lodging is provided by the
owner or operator who resides on the premises to three or more but less than fourteen
boarders. Included in this use type are rooming houses and tourist homes.
39 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Use Types
telecommunication service centers, telegraph service offices or film and sound recording
facilities.
CONSTRUCTION SALES AND SERVICES -.Establishments or places of business primarily
engaged in retail or wholesale sale, from the premises, of materials used in the construction
of buildings or other structures, but specifically excluding automobile or equipment supplies
otherwise classified herein. Typical uses include building material stores and home supply
establishments.
CONSUMER REPAIR SERVICES -Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of repair
services to individuals and households, rather than businesses, but excluding automotive and
equipment repair use types. Typical uses include appliance repair shops, shoe repair, watch
or jewelry repair shops, or repair of musical instruments.
CONVENIENCE STORE -Establishments primarily engaged in the provision of frequently or
recurrently needed goods for household consumption, such as prepackaged food and
beverages, and limited household supplies and hardware. Convenience stores shall not
include fuel pumps or the selling of fuel for motor vehicles. Typical uses include neighborhood
markets and country stores.
DANCE HALL -Establishments in which more than 10 percent of the total floor area is
designed or used as a dance floor, or where an admission fee is directly collected, or some
other form of compensation is obtained for dancing.
EQUIPMENT SALES AND RENTAL -Establishments primarily engaged in the sale or rental of
tools, trucks, tractors, construction equipment, agricultural implements, and similar industrial
equipment, and the rental of mobile homes. Included in this use type is the incidental storage,
maintenance, and servicing of such equipment.
FUNERAL HOME -Establishments engaged in undertaking services such as preparing the dead
for burial, and arranging and managing funerals. Typical uses include funeral homes or
mortuaries.
GARDEN CENTER -Establishments or places of business primarily engaged in retail or
wholesale (bulk) sale, from the premises, of trees, shrubs, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, plants
and plant materials primarily for agricultural, residential and commercial consumers. Such
establishments typically sell products purchased from others, but may sell some material
which they grow themselves. Typical uses include nurseries, plant stores and lawn and
garden centers.
GASOLINE STATION -Any place of business with fuel pumps and underground storage tanks
which provides fuels and oil for motor vehicles.
GOLF COURSE - A tract of land for playing golf, improved with tees, greens, fairways,
hazards, and which may include clubhouses ar~d shelters. Included would be executive or par
3 golf courses. Specifically excluded would be independent driving ranges and any miniature
golf course.
41 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Use Types
RESTAURANT, FAMILY - An establishment engaged in the preparation of food and beverages
containing no more than 2,000 gross square feet and characterized primarily by table service
to customers in non-disposable containers. Typical uses include cafes, coffee shops, and
small restaurants.
RESTAURANT, DRIVE-IN OR FAST FOOD - An establishment primarily engaged in the
preparation of food and beverages, for either take-out, delivery or table service, served in
disposable containers at a counter, a drive-up or drive through service facility or offers curb
service.
RETAIL SALES -Sale or rental with incidental service of commonly used goods and
merchandise for personal or household use but excludes those classified more specifically by
these use type classifications.
STUDIO, FINE ARTS - A building, or portion thereof, used as a place of work by a sculptor,
artist, or photographer.
SURPLUS SALES -Businesses engaged in the sale of used or new items, involving regular or
periodic outdoor display of merchandise for sale. Typical uses include flea markets and
factory outlets, or discount businesses with outdoor display.
TRUCK STOP - An establishment containing a mixture of uses which cater to the traveling
public and in particular motor freight operators. A truck stop might include such uses as fuel
pumps, restaurants, overnight accommodations, retail sales related to the motor freight
industry, and similar uses.
VETERINARY HOSPITAL/CLINIC- Any establishment rendering surgical and medical treatment
of animals. Boarding of animals shall only be conducted indoors, on a short term basis, and
shall only be incidental to such hospital/clinic use, unless also authorized and approved as a
commercial kennel.
Sec. 30-29-6 Industrial Use Tvoes
ASPHALT PLANT - An establishment engaged in manufacturing or mixing of paving materials
derived from asphaltic mixtures or tar.
CONSTRUCTION YARDS -Establishments housing facilities of businesses primarily engaged
in construction activities, including outside storage of materials and equipment. Typical uses
are building contractor's yards.
CUSTOM MANUFACTURING -Establishments primarily engaged in the on-site production of
goods by hand manufacturing, within enclosed structures, involving the use of hand tools, or
the use of mechanical equipment commonly associated with residential or commercial uses,
or a single kiln not exceeding 8 KW.
43 6/15/92
ARTICLE II
Use Types
SCRAP AND SALVAGE SERVICES -Places of business primarily engaged in the storage, sale,
dismantling or other processing of uses or waste materials which are not intended for reuse
in their original forms. Typical uses include paper and metal salvage yards, automotive
wrecking yards, junk yards, used tire storage yards, or retail and/or wholesale sales of used
automobile parts and supplies.
TRANSFER STATION -Any storage or collection facility which is operated as a relay point for
municipal solid waste which ultimately is to be transferred to a landfill.
TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL - A facility for loading, unloading, and interchange of
passengers, baggage, and incidental freight or package express between modes of ground
transportation, including bus terminals, railroad stations, and public transit facilities.
TRUCK TERMINAL - A facility for the receipt, transfer, short term storage, and dispatching
of goods transported by truck. Included in the use type would be express and other mail and
package distribution facilities, including such facilities operated by the U.S. post office.
WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION -Uses including storage, warehousing and dispatching
of goods within enclosed structures, or outdoors. Typical uses include wholesale distributors,
storage warehouses, moving/storage firms.
Sec. 30-29-7 Miscellaneous Use Tvaes
AVIATION FACILITIES, PRIVATE -Any area of land used or intended for the landing and
taking-off of aircraft for personal use of the tenant or owner of the site, not available for
public use or commercial operations. Aircraft includes helicopters, all fixed-wing planes and
gliders, but not hang gliders.
AVIATION FACILITIES, GENERAL -Landing fields, aircraft parking and service facilities, and
related facilities for operation, service, fueling, repair, storage, charter, sales, and rental of
aircraft, and including activities directly associated with the operation and maintenance of
airport facilities and the provision of safety and security.
BROADCASTING TOWER - A structure for the transmission, broadcasting or receiving of
radio, television, radar, or microwaves, including ham radio towers, and similar types of
devices.
OUTDOOR GATHERING -Any temporary organized gathering expected to attract 500 or more
people at one time in open spaces outside an enclosed structure. Included in this use type
would be music festivals, church revivals, carnivals and fairs, and similar transient amusement
and recreational activities not otherwise listed in this section. Such activities held in public
parks or on public school property shall not be included within this use type.
PARKING FACILITY, SURFACE/STRUCTURE -Use of a site for surface parking or a parking
structure unrelated to a specific use which provides one or more parking spaces together with
driveways, aisles, turning and maneuvering areas, incorporated landscaped areas, and similar
features meeting the requirements established by this ordinance. This use type shall not
include parking facilities accessory to a permitted principal use.
45 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
ARTICLE III -DISTRICT REGULATIONS
SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT
Sec. 30-32-1 Purpose
AG-3 District
(A) The AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve district consists of land primarily used as
farmland, woodlands, and widely scattered residential development located within the rural service
area. Also found in these areas are lands with steep slopes, and groundwater recharge areas.
Many of the County's unique natural and scenic resources are found in this district. The purpose
of this district is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, and attempt to protect
sensitive and unique land resources from degradation as recommended in the Rural Preserve land
use category of the Comprehensive Plan. This may be accomplished by maintaining the existing
agricultural lands and preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses. Non-farm residents
should recognize that they are located in an agricultural environment where the right-to-farm has
been established as County policy. This district is also intended to minimize the demand for
unanticipated public improvements and services, such as public sewer and water, by reducing
development densities and discouraging large scale development.
Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Agriculture
Farm Employee Housing *
Forestry Operations
Stable, Private
Stable, Commercial
Wayside Stand
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Home Occupation, Type I and II '
Kennel, Private *
Manufactured Home, Accessory
Manufactured Home, Class A *
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Detached
3. Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Family Day Care Home
Park and Ride Facility *
47 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
AG-3 District
1. All lots, regardless of sewer and water provisions:
a. Area: 3 acres (130,680 square feet)
b. Frontage: 200 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
c. Maximum width to depth ratio: 1 to 5 (W to D) on streets in existence prior to
the adoption of this ordinance.
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 50 feet
a. On Virginia Route 785 (Blacksburg Road): 150 feet
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet
b. Accessory structures: 25 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 35 feet
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory
buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 25 feet from any side property
line.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. All structures: 45 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 5 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 20 percent of the total lot area.
49 6/15/92
ARTICLE III AG-1 District
Park and Ride Facility *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Utility Services, Minor
4. Commercial U es
Bed and Breakfast *
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Aaricultural Uses
Commercial Feedlots
2. Civic Uses
Cemetery
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Major
3. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services *
Campgrounds
Kennel, Commercial
4. Industrial Uses
Custom Manufacturing
Landfill, Construction Debris *
Landfill, Sanitary
Resource Extraction *
5. Miscellaneous Uses
Aviation Facilities, Private
Broadcasting Tower
Outdoor Gatherings *
Shooting Range, Outdoor
Sec. 30-33-3 Site Development Regulations
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific
uses, see Article IV -Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements
1. All lots, regardless of sewer and water provisions:
a. Area: 1.5 acres (65,340 square feet)
51 6/15/92
ARTICLE III AR District
SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 30-34-1 Purpose
(A) These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional
uses mixed with agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area.
These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and
employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained, while non-farm residents
should recognize that they are located in an agricultural environment where the right-to-farm has
been established as County policy. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become
increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over
agricultural and more rural type uses.
The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the
Comprehensive Plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the
level of services anticipated by the County. These areas are generally suitable for low density
residential development and other compatible land uses.
Sec. 30-44-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestrv Uses
Agriculture
Farm Employee Housing
Forestry Operations
Stable, Private
Stable, Commercial
Wayside Stand *
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Home Occupation, Type I *
Kennel, Private *
Manufactured Home, Accessory
Manufactured Home, Class A
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Detached
3. Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Family Day Care Home
53 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
b. Frontage: 1 10 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet)
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet
a. On Virginia Route 785 (Blacksburg Road): 150 feet
2. Side yard:
AR District
a. Principal structures: 15 feet
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet behind front building line or 10 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
5. Where the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street, accessory
buildings may be located 150 feet from the street and 20 feet from any side property
line.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. All structures: 45 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 10 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 25 percent of the total lot area.
SEC. 30-35 (RESERVED)
55 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Cultural Services
Day Care Center
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary
Family Day Care Home
Park and Ride Facility
Post Office
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Safety Services *
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Minor
4. Office Uses
Financial Institutions *
General Office
Medical Office
5. Commercial Uses
Antique Shops
Bed and Breakfast *
Consumer Repair Services
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, Family
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
AV District
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Stable, Commercial
2. Residential Uses
Multi-family Dwelling
Townhouse *
3. Civic Uses
Cemetery
Crisis Center
Halfway House
Home for Adults
Life Care Facility
Nursing Home
Utility Services, Major
57 6/15/92
ARTICLE III AV District
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. All structures: 45 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 75 percent of the total lot area.
SEC.30-37...30-40 (RESERVED)
59 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses
Stable, Private *
2. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment *
Home Beauty/Barber Salon
3. Civic Uses
Cemetery
Crisis Center
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary
Religious Assembly *
Utility Services, Major
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings
Sec. 30-41-3 Site Development Regulations
R-1 District
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific
uses, see Article IV -Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area: 0.75 acre (32,670 square feet)
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
3. All lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet
61 6/15/92
ARTICLE III R-2 District
SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 30-42-1 Purpose
(A) The purpose of the R-2, Medium Density District is to establish areas in the County
within the urban service area where existing low-middle to middle density residential development
(one to six units per acre) is primarily located and land areas which appear generally appropriate
for such development. These areas are consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation land use
category, and where public services warrant, the Development land use category as recommended
in the Comprehensive Plan. This district is intended to provide reasonable protection to existing
single family residential neighborhoods, while accommodating a diversity of alternative housing
options. These areas are designated based on access to roads, sewer and water, and schools
with suitable capacity to accommodate development at the stated density. Older neighborhoods
where smaller platted lot sizes exist are also included where opportunities exist for additional in-fill
development.
Sec. 30-42-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Home Occupation, Type I
Kennel, Private
Manufactured Home, Class A
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Attached
Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *)
Two Family Dwelling "
2. Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Family Day Care Home *
Park and Ride Facility
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Minor
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
63 6/15/92
ARTICLE III R-2 District
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 25 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45~feet
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 30 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for
accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
SEC. 30-43 ...304 (RESERVED)
65 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
R-3 District
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Home Beauty/Barber Salon *
2. Civic Uses
Cemetery *
Crisis Center
Day Care Center
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary
Safety Services
Utility Services, Major
3. Industrial Uses
Landfill, Rubble *
4. Miscellaneous Uses
Outdoor Gatherings
Sec. 30-45-3 Site Development Regulations
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific
uses, see Article IV -Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements
1. All lots served by private well and sewage disposal systems:
a. Area:.75 acre (32,670 square feet)
b. Frontage: 90 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
3. All lots served by both public sewer and water:
a. Area: 7,200 square feet.
b. Frontage: 60 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
4. For minimum lot size and permitted densities for multi-family dwellings and townhouses
refer to Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
67 6/15/92
ARTICLE III R-4 District
SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 30-46-1 Purpose
(A) The purpose of the R-4, High Density Multi-family Residential district is to provide areas
in the County within the urban service area where existing high density residential development
(twelve to twenty-four units per acre) has been established and land areas which generally appear
to be appropriate for such development. These areas should serve as a buffer between less
intensive and more intensive districts. This district coincides with the recommendations for the
Transition and Core land use categories contained in the Comprehensive Plan where residential
development appears to be appropriate. These areas are designated based on direct access to
major streets, and where sewer, water, and schools and other public services have suitable
capacity to accommodate development at the stated density. An additional consideration is that
the parcel sizes allow for well planned residential development. A variety of housing densities and
styles is encouraged in order to permit a diversity and flexibility in design and layout. Additional
standards are established to provide for amenities in higher density developments.
Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Home Occupation, Type I
Manufactured Home, Class A
Manufactured Home, Emergency
Multi-family Dwelling
Residential Human Care Facility
Single Family Dwelling, Attached
Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *)
Townhouse "
Two Family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Community Recreation *
Family Day Care Home *
Park and Ride Facility
Public Parks and Recreational Areas
Religious Assembly
Utility Services, Minor
3. Commercial Uses
Boarding House
69 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
R-4 District
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind front building line or 3 feet behind rear
building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The
maximum height may be increased to 60 feet provided each required side and
rear yard is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 35 percent of the total lot area for all buildings and 7 percent for
accessory buildings.
2. Lot coverage: 75 percent of the total lot area.
71 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Safety Services
Utility Services, Major
Utility Services, Minor
3. Office Uses
General Office *
Medical Office
4. Commercial Uses
Convenience Store
Gasoline Station
Personal Services
Restaurant, Family
PRD District
(B) Other use types which are not listed above and which are determined to be appropriate
and compatible with the proposed development and surrounding uses maybe permitted in the PRD
district where they are specifically proposed in the initial preliminary master plan and approved
pursuant to Section 30-47-5.
Sec. 30-47-3 Site Development Regulations
(A) Each planned residential development shall be subject to the following site development
standards.
1. Minimum district size: 10 acres of contiguous land.
2. Maximum gross density: 5 dwelling units per acre, excluding any density bonuses
provided for below.
3. Minimum common open space and/or recreational areas: 15 percent of the gross area
of the PRD district.
4. Criteria for all open space:
a. Minimum countable open space: 5,000 contiguous square feet.
b. Minimum horizontal dimension: 50 feet, except that areas with a horizontal
distance of not less than 20 feet shall be counted as open space provided such
areas contain facilities such as, but not limited to, bikeways, exercise trails, tot
lots, gazebos, picnic tables, etc.
c. Common open space shall not include proposed street right-of-ways, open
parking areas, driveways, or sites reserved for schools or places of religious
assembly.
d. Common open space and/or recreational areas shall be of an appropriate nature
and location to serve the residents of the district.
5. Open space bonus: for each additional 5 percent of open space the maximum gross
density specified in (A) 2. above shall be increased 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The
maximum open space bonus shall be 25 percent.
73 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Sec. 30-47-5 Application Process
PRD District
(A) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions,
the applicant and county staff shall meet to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose
of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process.
The applicant is encouraged to submit information on the scope and nature of the proposal to
allow staff to become familiar with the proposal in advance of this meeting.
(B) Any application to rezone land to the PRD designation, shall constitute an amendment
to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section 30-14. The written and graphic information submitted
by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-
15 of this ordinance. Once the Board of Supervisors has approved the final master plan, all
accepted proffers shall constitute conditions pursuant to Section 30-15.
(C) To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete a rezoning application packet. This
information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a
preliminary master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly
and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum
this information shall include:
1. A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot
lines, and easements.
2. Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district.
3. A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PRD district, including
a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed
ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives
towards any specific man-made and natural characteristics located on the site.
4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on
topography, archeological and historic resources, natural water courses, floodplains,
unique natural features, tree cover areas, etc.
5. Aland use plan designating specific uses for the site, both residential and non-
residential uses, and establishing site development regulations, including setback,
height, building coverage, lot coverage, and density requirements.
6. A circulation plan, including location of existing and proposed vehicular, pedestrian,
bicycle, and other circulation facilities and location and general design of parking and
loading facilities. General information on the trip generation, ownership and
maintenance and proposed construction standards for these facilities should be
included. A Traffic Impact Analysis may be required by the Administrator.
7. A public services and utilities plan providing requiremen~s for and provision of all
utilities, sewers, and other facilities to serve the site.
75 6/15/92
ARTICLE III PRD District
2. Substantial change in circulation or access;
3. Substantial change in the mixture of dwelling unit types included in the project;
4. Substantial changes in grading or utility provisions;
5. Substantial changes in the mixture of land uses or an increase in the amount of land
devoted to non-residential purposes;
6. Reduction in the approved open space, landscaping or buffering;
7. Substantial change in architectural or site design features of the development;
8. Any other change that the Administrator finds is a major divergence from the approved
final master plan.
(B) All other changes in the final master plan shall be considered minor amendments. The
Administrator, upon receipt of a written request of the owner, may approve such minor
amendments.
1. If the Administrator fails to act on a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan
within 15 calendar days, it shall be considered approved.
2. A request which is disapproved by the Administrator shall be considered a major
amendment and shall be subject to the approval process outlined above for such
amendments.
Sec. 30-47-7 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans
(A) Following the approval of the final master plan, the applicant or its authorized agent,
shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site
development plans for any phase or component of the PRD that involves the construction of
structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and
the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans
are found in a document entitled Land Develooment Procedures, available in the Department of
Engineering and Inspections.
(B) It is the intent of this section that subdivision review under the subdivision regulations
be carried out simultaneously with the review of a planned residential development under this
section. The plans required under this section shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the
requirements of the subdivision regulations, as determined by the Administrator.
(C) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall in compliance
with the final master plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall review
and approve or disapprove any Final Site Development Plan within 60 days of its submittal.
(DI No Planned Residential Development shall be approved and no work shall be authorized
on construction until all property included in the Final Master Plan is in common ownership.
77 6/15/92
ARTICLE III R-MH District
SEC. 30-48 R-MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT
Sec. 30-48-1 Purpose
(A) The provisions of the R-MH Manufactured Housing Overlay District are designed to
increase opportunities for affordable housing alternatives, to recognize modern advances in
manufactured housing technology, and to promote cost effective site development. This overlay
district provides locations where manufactured housing communities may harmoniously develop
in residential areas in which a mix of other affordable housing types -- multi-family apartments,
duplexes, townhouses, and compact detached housing -- may also develop. Furthermore, this
district provides for institutional support services, such as schools, churches, parks, and
community clubs within residential neighborhoods, yet protects against the intrusion of
incompatible commercial and industrial uses.
Sec. 30-48-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance, in addition to those uses permitted in the underlying zoning district.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Manufactured Home Subdivisions *
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19,
in addition to those uses permitted by Special Use Permit in the underlying zoning district. An
asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use
and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Manufactured Home Park
Sec. 30-48-3 Site Development Regulations
(A) All uses permitted by right or permitted with a special use permit in the underlying
zoning district shall conform to the site development regulations for that district, in addition to any
additional standards required by this ordinance.
(B) For the Site Development Standards for Manufactured Home Subdivisions and Parks
refer to Article IV, Use and Design Standards.
Sec. 30-48-4 Designation and Process for Creation of Overlay
(A) The R-MH District shall be considered an overlay to the underlying zoning district
designations as shown on the Official Zoning Map. This district may be approved as an overlay
district to the AR, R-1, R-2, R-3, or R-4 District provisions by the Board pursuant to Section 30-
79 6/15/92
ARTICLE III NC District
SEC. 30-51 NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 30-51-1 Purpose
(A) The purpose of this district is to provide for the development of low intensity retail
sales and service establishments developed either as a coordinated unit or on individual parcels
which primarily serve the residents of a geographically limited neighborhood or residential area.
The total district size should be no more than three acres and expansion beyond this size should
be limited. Neighborhood Commercial districts are most appropriately found along or near a
residential collector street or minor arterial roadway which serves the residents of a particular
subdivision or cluster of residences. These areas should also be served by public sewer and
water. Land uses permitted in this district are compatible with the recommendations set forth in
the Neighborhood Conservation and Development categories of the Comprehensive Development
Plan. to order to enhance the general character of the district, its function of neighborhood
service, and its compatibility with residential surroundings, building heights, the size of certain
uses and characteristics are all limited.
Sec. 30-51-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
Civic Uses
Community Recreation
Cultural Services
Day Care Center
Educational Facility, Primary/Secondary
Family Day Care Home
Post Office
Religious Assembly *
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Safety Services
Utility Services, Minor
2. Office Uses
General Office *
Medical Office
3. Commercial Uses
Convenience Store
Personal Services
Restaurant, Family
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
81 6/15/92
ARTICLE III C-1 District
SEC. 30-53 C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT
Sec. 30-53-1 Purpose
(Al The purpose of the C-1 Office District is to provide for the development of attractive
and efficient office uses in the urban service area which serve both community and county-wide
needs. The C-1 district allows for varying intensities of office development as part of either a
planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses. Retail uses are permitted,
to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment.
The C-1 districts are most appropriately found along or near major arterial streets where existing
commercial development has occurred and/or where commercial zoning has been established, or
near existing residential development where it would serve as a logical buffer strip between
conflicting land use types.
Land uses permitted in the C-1 Office District are generally consistent with the recommendations
forth in the Transition and Core land use categories of the Comprehensive Development Plan. Site
development standards are intended to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses.
Sec. 30-53-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Residential Uses
Accessory Apartment
Home Beauty/Barber Salon
Home Occupation, Type I
Multi-family Dwelling
Two-family Dwelling *
2. Civic Uses
Administrative Services
Clubs
Cultural Services
Day Care Center *
Educational Facilities, College/University
Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary
Guidance Services
Park and Ride Facility
Post Office
Public Parks and Recreational Areas *
Religious Assembly
Safety Services
Utility Services, Minor
83 6/15/92
ARTICLE III C-1 District
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
a. Area: 15,000 square feet
b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet on any one side, with a combined total on both
sides of at least 25 feet.
b. Accessory structures: 10 feet behind the front building line, or 3 feet behind
rear building line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including
rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided
each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two
feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all other locations the height is
unlimited unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance.
b. Accessory structures: 15 feet
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 80 percent of the total lot area.
85 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Medical Office
Laboratories
4. Commercial Uses
Agricultural Services
Antique Shops
Automobile Dealership, New
Automobile Repair Services, Minor
Automobile Rental/Leasing
Automobile Parts/Supply, Retail
Bed and Breakfast *
Boarding House
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools
Clinic
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
Communications Services
Construction Sales and Services
Consumer Repair Services
Funeral Services
Garden Center
Gasoline Station
Hospital
Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge
Kennel, Commercial *
Pawn Shop
Personal Improvement Services
Personal Services
Restaurant, General
Restaurant, Family
Retail Sales
Studio, Fine Arts
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
5. Industrial Uses
Recycling Centers and Stations
6. Miscellaneous Uses
Broadcasting Tower
Parking Facility
C-2 District
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
$~ 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
C-2 District
(B) Minimum setback requirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line.
2. Side yard: None.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. Height limitations:
a. Principal structures: When adjoining property zoned R-1 or R-2, 45 feet, including
rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased, provided
each required side and rear yard adjoining the R-1 or R-2 district is increased two
feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. In all locations the height is unlimited
unless otherwise restricted by this ordinance.
b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure.
(D) Maximum coveraae
1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
SEC. 30-55 (RESERVED)
SEC. 30-56 INT INTERCHANGE DISTRICT (RESERVED)
SEC. 30-57 PCD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (RESERVED)
SEC.30-58...30-60 (RESERVED)
89 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Business or Trade Schools
Equipment Sales and Rental
Laundry
5. Industrial Uses
Custom Manufacturing
Industry, Type I
Landfill, Rubble *
Recycling Centers and Stations
Transportation Terminal
Truck Terminal
Warehousing and Distribution
6. Miscellaneous Uses
Broadcasting Tower
Parking Facilities
I-1 District
(B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19.
An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV,
Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Commercial Uses
Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
Mini-warehouse
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop *
2. Industrial Uses
Resource Extraction *
Transfer Station
3. Miscellaneous Uses
Aviation Facilities, Private
Outdoor Gatherings
Sec. 30-61-3 Site Development Regulations
General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific
uses, see Article IV -Use and Design Standards.
(A) Minimum lot requirements
1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system;
a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet)
b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
91 6/15/92
ARTICLE III I-2 District
SEC. 30-62 1-2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 30-62-1 Purpose
(A) The purpose of the I-2, Industrial district is to provide areas within the urban service
area which contain existing more intensive industrial uses or are suitable for such activities. These
areas coincide with the Principal Industrial land use category contained in the Comprehensive Plan
and are designated based on the suitability of the land in terms of slope and freedom from flooding
and the relative remoteness and absence of substantial residential development which could be
adversely affected by such development. In addition, the availability of adequate sewer and water
capacity, access to arterial road network, and proximity to rail and airport facilities or the interstate
highway system are major considerations. Distributing these areas around the County in a planned
manner to create employment centers within close proximity to residential growth areas and
reduce heavy traffic generation of industrial uses is encouraged.
Sec. 30-62-2 Permitted Uses
(A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements
contained in this Ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified or more stringent
standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses.
1. Agricultural and Forestrv Uses
Agriculture
2. Civic Uses
Day Care Center
Park and Ride Facility
Post Office
Public Maintenance and Service Facilities
Safety Services
Utility Services, Minor
Utility Services, Major
3. Office Uses
Financial Institutions •
General Office
Laboratories
4. Commercial Uses
Automobile Repair Services, Major
Business Support Services
Business or Trade Schools
Equipment Sales and Service
Laundry
93 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
I-2 District
2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both:
a. Area: 20,000 square feet
b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street.
(B) Minimum setback reouirements
1. Front yard: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line.
2. Side yard:
a. Principal structures: 10 feet
b. Accessory structures: behind front building line and 3 feet from side line.
3. Rear yard:
a. Principal structures: 15 feet
b. Accessory structures: 3 feet
4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all
streets.
(C) Maximum height of structures
1. Height limitations:
a. All structures: 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum
height may be increased to 100 feet provided each side and rear yard is
increased one foot for each foot in height over 45 feet.
(D) Maximum coverage
1. Building coverage: 75 percent of the total lot area.
2. Lot coverage: 90 percent of the total lot area.
SEC. 30-63 PID PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (RESERVED)
SEC.30-64...30-70 (RESERVED)
95 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
EP District
clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a
minimum this information shall include:
1. A legal description of the proposed site. This may be a metes and bounds description
and plat, or a tabular summary of all tax parcels proposed for rezoning. If tax parcels
are used, a composite plan shall be submitted, showing the limits of the proposed
district, and the location of each parcel within the district.
2. Current information on the existing zoning and land use of each parcel proposed for the
district.
3. If future additions to the district are envisioned, a concept plan showing their location
shall be submitted. This concept plan shall show the relationship of these parcels to
the proposed district, and their intended use, if known.
4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on
topography, archeological and historic resources, natural water courses, floodplains,
unique natural features, tree cover areas, etc. A general statement of planning
objectives is to be included indicating how the development and use of the site will
address the management and preservation of these features.
5. A generalized land use plan. This plan shall in schematic form show the proposed
location of all major land use or activity areas. For each area designated, information
shall be provided in written and/or graphic form that describes the nature and character
of the improvements or activities proposed. This information shall be of sufficient
detail to clearly portray the intended use and design objectives.
6. For planned activity areas devoted to office, retail, restaurant, lodging, education,
conference, or other similar types of commercial activities, information shall be
provided on the maximum intensity, size or number of such activities, their generalized
location and operating characteristics, and a generalized phasing plan for their
construction. The size and scale of all retail, restaurant and lodging facilities shall be
limited to serve a support function to the larger purposes of the Park.
7. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural and community design guidelines
shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs,
orientations, styles, heights, lighting plans, treatment of outside storage areas etc.
8. The general arrangements envisioned for the management and control of uses and
activities not directly owned by VRFA shall be included. This information shall address
the general nature of such uses, and the nature of any control proposed to be
exercised.
9. A description of vehicular transportation and circulation objectives. This information
should include information on proposals and limitations on parking areas, and public,
emergency, service, and construction access. General information on the proposed
construction standards for these facilities should be included. The generalized location
of all existing or proposed major roads within the district should be shown, and
97 6/15/92
ARTICLE III EP District
(G) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary master plan, and act to approve
or deny the plan within 90 days. Approval of the preliminary master plan shall constitute
acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this
ordinance. The plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the final master plan
for the park. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Administrator shall authorize the
revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the EP district.
Sec. 30-71-6 Revisions to Final Master Plan
(A) Major revisions to the final master plan shall be reviewed and approved following the
procedures and requirements of Section 30-71-5 above. Major revisions, as determined by the
Administrator may include, but not be limited to changes such as:
1. Either (a) the addition of major new land uses or activities not planned at the time of
the approval of the final master plan, or (b) the substantial relocation of uses or
activities shown on the approved final master plan.
2. The acquisition of property by the VRFA, if such property is intended to be
incorporated and used as part of the Park activities.
3. Any transportation or road alignment changes resulting in any change in the location
of public access to the Park, or substantial changes in the location or number of service
and employee access locations.
Sec. 30-71-7 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans
(A) Following the approval of the final master plan, the VRFA or its authorized agent, shall
be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site
development plans for any phase or component of the Park that involves the construction of
structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and
the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans
are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Department of
Engineering and Inspections.
(B) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall be substantially
in accord with the final master plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall
review and approve or disapprove any Final Site Development Plan within 60 days of its submittal.
Administrative review of these plans shall ensure compliance with the approved final master plan.
Sec. 30-71-8 Failure to Begin Development
(A) Failure of the VRFA to submit a preliminary site development plan for at least one
portion of the park within 5 years of the approval of the final master plan, shall constitute an
application on the part of VRFA to rezone the EP to the district designations in effect prior to the
approval of the final master plan.
99 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
AO District
Further, Transition Zones shall be adjacent to both instrument and noninstrument
approach zones for the entire length of the approach zones. These Transition Zones
have variable widths, as shown on the Roanoke Regional Airport Zoning Map. Such
Transition Zones flare symmetrically with either side of the runway approach zones
from the base of such zones and slope upward and outward at the rate of one foot
vertically for each seven feet horizontally to the points where they intersect the
surfaces of the horizontal and conical zones. Furthermore, Transition Zones shall be
adjacent to the instrument approach zone where it projects through and beyond the
limits of the conical zone, extending a distance of five thousand feet measured
horizontally from the edge of the instrument approach zones at right angles to the
continuation of the centerline of the runway.
4. Horizontal Zone. The Horizontal Zone shall be the area within a circle with its center
at the airport reference point and having a radius of seven thousand feet. The
horizontal zone does not include the instrument and noninstrument approach zones and
the transition zones.
5. Conical Zone. Conical Zone shall be the area that commences at the periphery of the
horizontal zone and extends outward therefrom a distance of five thousand feet. The
conical zone does not include the instrument approach zones and transition zones.
Sec. 30-72-3 Height Limitations
(A) Except as may otherwise be provided in this Section, no structure or tree shall be
erected, altered, allowed to grow or maintained in any zone created by this Section to a height in
excess of the height limit herein established for such zone. Such height limitations are hereby
established for each of the zones as follows:
1. Instrument Aooroach Zones One foot in height for each fifty feet in horizontal
distance beginning at a point two hundred feet from and at the centerline elevation of
the end of the instrument runway and extending to a distance of ten thousand two
hundred feet from the end of the runway; thence one foot in height for each forty feet
in horizontal distance to a point fifty thousand two hundred feet from the end of the
runway.
2. Noninstrument Aooroach Zones One foot in height for each forty feet in horizontal
distance beginning at a point two hundred feet from and at the centerline elevation of
the end of the noninstrument runway and extending to a point ten thousand two
hundred feet from the end of the runway.
3) Transition Zone. One foot in height for each seven feet in horizontal distance beginning
at any point two hundred fifty feet normal to and at the elevation of the centerline of
noninstrument runways, extending two hundred feet beyond each end thereof, and five
hundred feet normal to and at the elevation of the centerline of the instrument runway,
extending two hundred feet beyond each end thereof, extending to a height of one
hundred fifty feet above the airport elevation which is one thousand one hundred
seventy-five feet above mean sea level.
101 6/15/92
ARTICLE III AO District
(D) All of the provisions of this Section shall be considered by the Administrator when
reviewing application for zoning permits. The applicant for a zoning permit shall include and
submit adequate information and detail necessary to ensure that the limitations of this Section
shall not be exceeded.
(E) Other than as provided in subsections immediately preceding, any variance authorized
to the provisions of this Section shall be so conditioned as to require the owner of the structure
or tree in question, as his own expense, to install, operate and maintain thereon such markers and
lights as may be deemed necessary by the Board of Zoning Appeals, acting with the advice and
recommendation of the Federal Aviation Agency or the airport manager.
(F) Structures- of public utilities shall be excluded from the requirements of the Section
provided plans for such structures have first been reviewed and determined by the Federal
Aviation Agency to have no adverse effect on air navigation as provided in part 77 of the Federal
Aviation Agency's Regulations.
103 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Sec. 30-73-6 Appeals
ECO District
(A) Any decision of the Technical Services Officer with regards to the requirements of this
Section shall be considered a decision of the Administrator, and may be appealed to the Board of
Zoning Appeals pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance.
105 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
Sec. 30-74-3 Compliance
FO District
(A) No land shall hereafter be developed and no structure shall be located, relocated,
constructed, enlarged, or structurally altered except in full compliance with the terms and
provisions of this Section and any other applicable ordinances and regulations which apply to uses
within the jurisdiction of this Section.
Sec. 30-74-4 Delineation of Areas
(A) The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to inundation by waters of the
100 year flood. The primary basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the Flood Insurance
Study for Roanoke County prepared by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Federal Insurance Administration, dated October 17, 1978. These areas are more specifically
defined as follows:
1. The Floodwav is delineated for purposes of this Section using the criteria that a certain
area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the 100 year flood
without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any
point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 2 of the above referenced
Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map
accompanying that study.
2. The Flood-Fringe shall be that area of the 100-year floodplain not included in the
Floodway. The basis for the outermost boundary of the Flood-Fringe shall be the 100
year flood elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above referenced Flood
Insurance Study and as shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map
accompanying the study.
3. The Aooroximated Floodolain shall be that floodplain area for which no detailed flood
profiles or elevations are provided, but where the drainage area is greater than 100
acres. Such areas may be on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map. Where the
specific 100-year flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other
sources of data such the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Floodplain Information
Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for
the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this elevation in
accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic engineering techniques. Hydrologic and
hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others of
demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly
reflect currently accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall
be related to existing land use and potential development under existing zoning.
Studies, analyses, computations, etc., shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow
a thorough review by the County Engineer.
107 6/15/92
ARTICLE III FO District
(C) The lowest floor elevation of any new residential structure constructed within a
floodplain area shall be at least two (2) feet above base flood elevation. The lowest floor elevation
of any new non-residential structure constructed within a floodplain area shalt be at least one (1)
foot above base flood elevation, unless such structure is floodproofed. In addition, no existing
structure shall be modified, expanded or enlarged unless the new construction complies with this
standard.
Sec. 30-74-8 Floodway Development Regulations
(A) In the Floodway no development shall be permitted except where the effect of such
development on flood heights is fully offset by accompanying improvements which have been
approved by all appropriate authorities as required above.
(B) The placement of any manufactured home, except in an existing manufactured home
park within the Floodway is specifically prohibited.
(C) In the Floodway, the following uses types and activities are permitted provided that (1)
they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying Zoning District, (2) are not prohibited
by any other ordinance and (3) no specific land use require any type of structure, fill, or storage
of materials and equipment:
Agricultural
2. Public Parks and Recreational Areas
3. Outdoor Sports and Recreation
4. Golf Courses
5. Accessory residential uses such as yard areas, gardens, play areas, and loading areas.
6. Accessory industrial and commercial uses such as yard areas, parking and loading
areas, airport landing strips, etc.
(D) The following uses and activities maybe permitted by Special Use pursuant to Section
30-19 of this ordinance provided that they are in compliance with the provisions of the underlying
Zoning District and are not prohibited by this or any other ordinance:
1. Structures (except for manufactured homes) accessory to the uses and activities
Ri°ht, above.
2. Certain utilities and public facilities and improvements such as pipe lines, water and
sewage treatment plants, and other similar or related uses.
3. Water-related uses and activities such as marinas, docks, wharves, piers, etc.
109 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
FO District
4. A summary report, prepared by professional engineers or others of demonstrated
qualifications, evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities;
the seriousness of flood damage to the use; and other pertinent technical matters.
5. A list of names and addresses of adjoining property owners.
(B) In acting upon such applications, the Planning Commission and the County Board of
Supervisors shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance and:
1. The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by
encroachments. No special use shall be granted for any proposed use, development,
or activity within the Floodway that will cause any increase in flood levels during the
100 year flood.
2. The danger that materials may be swept on to other lands or downstream to the injury
of others.
3. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to
prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions.
4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the
effect of such damage on the individual owners.
5. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the County.
6. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location.
7. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use.
8. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development
anticipated in the foreseeable future.
9. The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and floodplain
management program for the county.
10. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency
vehicles.
1 1. Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of this Section.
Sec. 30-74-11 Variances
(A) The Board of Zoning Appeals may consider variances to the requirements of this
Section, under the following guidelines and conditions:
1. Variances may not be considered within any Floodway if any increase in flood levels
during the 100 year flood would result.
111 6/15/92
ARTICLE III
FO District
2. Any modification, alteration, repair, reconstruction, or improvement of any kind to a
structure and/or use located in any floodplain area to an extent or amount of 50
percent or more of its market value, shall be undertaken only in full compliance with
the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building-Code.
Sec. 30-74-13 Liability
(A) The degree of flood protection sought by the provisions of this Section is considered
reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on acceptable engineering methods of study.
Larger floods may occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or
natural causes, such as ice jams and bridge openings restricted by debris. This Section does not
imply that areas outside floodplain areas, or that land uses permitted within such areas, will be
free from flooding or flood damages.
(B) This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of Roanoke County or any officers
or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any
administrative decision lawfully made thereunder.
SEC.30-74...30-79 (RESERVED)
113 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
ARTICLE IV USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS
SEC. 30-80 USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS
Use Standards-Ag.
(A) The standards contained in the district regulations in Article III shall apply to all of the
following use types, unless specifically modified and/or superseded by the use and design
standards below.
(B) The standards listed as general standards shall apply in all districts in which the use
type is permitted by right or permitted subject to approval of a special use permit, as indicated in
Article I11, District Regulations.
(C) Where a specific zoning district is indicated, the standards listed below shall apply to
that zoning district, in addition to any general standards listed for that use.
SEC. 30-81 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES
Sec. 30-81-1 Agriculture
(A) In the AR and AV districts, the keeping of swine for commercial purposes shall be
prohibited.
Sec. 30-81-2 Commercial Feedlots
(A) General standards:
1. Containment areas for animals shall be located 500 feet from any property line,
regardless of ownership, or any public right-of-way.
2. Any commercial feedlot proposed shall prepare and follow a management plan for
responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan
shall be approved by the Virginia Water Control Board.
3. Commercial feedlots shall be laid out and established consistent with the design
recommendations and standards set forth in the most recent issue of Best Management
Practices Handbook of the Virginia Water Control Board.
Sec. 30-81-3 Farm Employee Housing
(A) General standards:
1. Asingle-family dwelling, Class A Manufactured Home or Accessory Manufactured
Home, shall be permitted as an accessory use to an agricultural use exclusively for a
farm employee, and his/her family. Class A and Accessory Manufactured Homes shall
meet the requirements contained elsewhere in this Article. .
115 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Ag.
2. On lots of less than five acres, no more than one stable animal per acre shall be
permitted.
3. Stables and corrals shall comply with all the setback requirements for accessory
buildings.
4. Stables shall .properly manage animal waste so as to not create a nuisance or health
hazard to adjoining or nearby property owners.
Sec. 30-81-6 Stable, Commercial
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum lot size: 5 acres.
2. Minimum setback for stables and riding arenas: 50 feet from all property lines.
3. Accessory tack shops not exceeding 1,000 square feet are permitted in conjunction
with commercial stables.
4. Commercial stables shall prepare and follow a management plan for responsible and
environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan shall be acceptable
to the Virginia Water Control Board. Animal waste shall not create a nuisance or health
hazard to adjoining property owners.
Sec. 30-81-7 Wayside Stands
(A) General standards:
1. Front yard setback: 35 feet from any public right-of-way.
2. At least 50 percent of the goods and/or merchandise shall be produced on the site of
the stand, on adjoining contiguous property or on other properties owned or leased by
the owner of the site on which the wayside stand is located.
3. Entrances and exits to roads shall be clearly delineated, shall be so located as to
provide safe ingress and egress from roads, and shall be approved by the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
117 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Use Standards-Res.
(D) General Standards in the C-1 district, independent of the General standards above:
1. The accessory apartment shall be allowed only in the same structure as, and in
conjunction with, an associated civic, office or commercial use type.
2. The civic, office or commercial use type must occupy at least 50 percent of the gross
floor area of the structure.
Sec. 30-82-2 Home Beauty/Barber Salon
(A) Intent -Under certain unique circumstances asmall-scaled beauty and/or barber shops
may be an appropriate use within a residential dwelling. The standards and procedure for
establishing such uses are intended to limit the scope and nature of such uses and insure
capability with the adjoining properties.
(B) In the AR district and in all Residential Districts the following standards shall apply, in
addition to obtaining a special use permit from the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 30-
19:
The applicant shall submit documentation that an infirmity exists which prevents either
the salon operator or a permanent occupant of the dwelling unit from regularly leaving
the dwelling to pursue gainful employment.
2. The salon shall be limited to one chair only.
3. The retail sale of beauty and barber supplies shall be prohibited.
4. The special use permit shall be granted for a period of one year and may be renewed
administratively for successive one year periods provided the Administrator has not
received written complaints from adjoining residents.
(C) In the AV, C-1 and C-2 districts a home beauty/barber salon shall be limited to no more
than two chairs.
Sec. 30-82-3 Home Occupations, Type I and Type II
(A) Intent -These provisions are adopted in recognition that certain small-scaled
commercial activities may be appropriate accessory uses within residential dwellings. The
character and scale of such commercial activities must be subordinate and incidental to the
principal use of the premises for dwelling purposes, and must be consistent with the predominant
residential character of the property and/or surrounding neighborhood. In addition, these
provisions are intended to limit the size of such home occupations so as to not create an unfair
competitive advantage over businesses located in commercially zoned areas.
(B) General standards:
1. More than one home occupation may be permitted provided the total floor area used
for all home occupations do not exceed the applicable Type I or Type 11 standard.
119 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Use Standards-Res.
4. There shall be no display or storage of goods or products visible from the public right-
of-way or adjacent property.
5. The sale of goods or products produced on the premises, or providing services which
involve the consumer coming to the premises shall be limited to no more than 10
customers or clients in any one week period. Baby sitting for 5 or less children shall
be permitted.
6. Lessons in the applied arts shall be permitted, provided the class size for any lesson
does not exceed 5 student at any one time and shall not exceed 10 students in any
one week period.
7. No sign may be placed on the property advertising the home occupation.
8. No advertising through local media, including telephone books, and flyers shall call
attention to the residential address of the home occupation.
(D) Addition standards for all Type II home occupations:
1. The maximum floor area permitted for a home occupation shall be 25 percent of the
finished floor area of the dwelling unit. Storage of goods or products shall not exceed
10 percent of the finished floor area.
2. One person who is not a permanent residents of the dwelling may be engaged or
employed in the home occupation.
3. An accessory building or structure may be used with the home occupation, provided
that the total floor area devoted to the home occupation in the accessory structure and
dwelling unit does not exceed 25 percent of the finished floor area of the dwelling unit.
4. Lessons in the applied arts shall be permitted, provided the class size for any lesson
does not exceed 5 student at any one time and shall not exceed 10 students in any
one week period.
5. One non-illuminated sign, a maximum of 2 square feet in area, shall be permitted per
dwelling, regardless of the number of home occupations within the dwelling. Any sign
must conform with the provisions of Section 30-93 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Sec. 30-82-4 Kennel, Private
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum lot size: 1 acre.
2. A private kennel shall be permitted only when accessory to a single family dwelling.
121 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Res.
2. In considering any application for an accessory manufactured home the Administrator
shall visit the proposed site to view the proposed location and the character of the
surrounding area. In making a determination to issue or deny any application the
Administrator shall consider all of the following factors:
a. The purposes of the zoning ordinance outlined in Section 30-3.
b. The effect of the proposed accessory manufactured home on the conservation
of surrounding properties and their values, and its effect on the existing use and
character of the property.
c. The general land use compatibility of the accessory manufactured home in
relation to surrounding properties.
3. If the Administrator determines that the proposal does not conform to any of the
location, use or design standards contained in the above, the Administrator shall deny
the application and notify the applicant in writing. Any such denial may be appealed
to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
4. If the Administrator determines that the proposal conforms to the provisions of this
Section, the Administrator shall mail a first class letter to all adjacent property owners
notifying each owner of the County's intent to issue a permit for the accessory
manufactured home. All parties shall be given 15 days from the date of the notice to
formally object in writing to the issuance of the permit. If an objection is filed, it shall
be considered an appeal of the decision of the Administrator, and shall be considered
by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The person filing the appeal shall be responsible for
all required application and legal ad costs.
5. If no interested party objects within fifteen days of the date of the notice to the
adjacent property owners, the administrator may approve the accessory manufactured
home permit.
Sec. 30-82-6 Manufactured Home, Class A
(A) Intent -Manufactured homes provide a viable and affordable housing option for a
segment of the County's population. This housing option is provided under certain design criteria
in large portions of the County where they will not conflict with developments planned for site
built dwellings.
(B) General standards:
1. The location of a Class A manufactured home in a planned residential subdivision, as
defined in Article II of this ordinance, shall be prohibited.
2. The manufactured home shall have the tow assembly and wheels removed and be
mounted on and anchored to a permanent foundation in accordance with the provisions
of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
123 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Res.
2. Only one emergency manufactured home shall be permitted on any lot of record. It
shall be located on the same lot as the destroyed dwelling, and must be occupied only
by the person, persons, or family, whose dwelling was destroyed.
3. The emergency manufactured home shall meet all setback and yard requirements for
the district in which it is located. It shall be anchored and stabilized in accordance with
the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
4. The emergency manufactured home must be removed as soon as reconstruction or
replacement of the uninhabitable dwelling is complete, or within a 12 month period of
its placement on the site, whichever is sooner. A one time extension of up to 6
additional months maybe granted by the Administrator if substantial reconstruction of
the destroyed dwelling has occurred, and work has, and is continuing to progress. A
final certificate of zoning compliance for the reconstructed dwelling shall not be issued
until the emergency manufactured home is removed from the site.
(C) Federal Disasters -Where the President of the United States has declared a Federal
Disaster, the Administrator, upon consent of the County Administrator, may authorize the
placement of temporary manufactured homes supplied by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) to disaster victims who lost their homes. In such cases, all zoning and building
code requirements shall be waived in favor of FEMA standards. The period for temporary
placement of manufactured homes shall be 12 months, unless FEMA authorizes an extension for
an additional 12 months.
Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park
(A) General standards:
Minimum tract size for any new or expanding park: 5 contiguous acres.
2. Minimum frontage for any new or expanding park: 50 feet on a publicly owned and
maintained street.
3. Maximum density for any new or expanding park served by a public water and sewer
system: 7 dwelling units per gross acre. Lower densities may be required if the park
is not served by public water and sewer.
4. In a Manufactured Home Park the type of Manufactured Home permitted shall be Class
B Manufactured Homes or Class C Manufactured Homes consistent with Section 30-
82-7.
5. A Type C buffer yard, as defined in Section 30-92 of this ordinance, shall be installed
along the side and rear perimeter of the park. No square footage allocated to a
manufactured home lot shall be located within any portion of a required buffer yard.
125 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Res.
2. Each manufactured home lot shall be provided with a minimum of 300 cubic feet of
storage area. This shall be accomplished by one of the following:
a. Common storage areas available within the park; OR,
b. Within an accessory structure installed by the park owner or management, or
required of the occupant of the lot by the park owner or management.
(F) Recreation Areas:
1. Minimum usable space for recreational areas: 8 percent of the gross area of the
manufactured home park.
2. Criteria for all recreational areas:
a. Minimum countable space: 5,000 contiguous square feet.
b. Minimum horizontal dimension: 50 feet, except that areas with a horizontal
distance of not less than 20 feet shall be counted as open space provided such
areas contain facilities such as, but not limited to, bikeways, exercise trails, tot
lots, gazebos, picnic tables, etc.
c. Space shall not include manufactured home lots, buffer yards, street right-of-
ways, open parking areas, or driveways.
d. Recreational areas shall include passive and active facilities and be of an
appropriate nature and location to serve the residents of the park. This may
include facilities such as recreation centers, swimming pools, tennis and
basketball courts and similar facilities.
3. Maintenance of the designated recreation areas shall be the responsibility of the park
management.
(G) Management Office, Service and Community Facilities:
1. An office area, devoted solely to the management of the park shall be allowed within
the manufactured home park.
2. Retail convenience sales, located and designed to serve the daily needs of only the park
residents are allowed within a manufactured home park provided:
a. Such sales must be located within the same building as the management office,
and must not exceed 50 percent of the total gross floor area of the building.
b. No business signs associated with these sales are displayed on the exterior of
the building, or are otherwise displayed to be visible from any public right-of-
way. No other forms of advertising shall be used that are intended to market the
convenience sales to non-park residents.
127 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Res.
3. Parking spaces shall be provided for the management office, and other community
facilities to serve the convenience and needs of the residents.
4. Additional parking spaces, not required by this Section may be provided along certain
private streets where adequate width is provided, as specified above.
(J) Utilities:
1. All new utility lines within the park shall be placed underground.
2. If public water is not available to serve the park, a community water system, meeting
the County's water standards, shall be provided. Individual water meters shall be
provided to each manufactured home lot.
3. If septic systems are used, the drain field shall be located within the perimeter of the
park.
(K) Refuse Disposal:
1. Refuse disposal shall be the responsibility of park management. Common refuse areas
shall be provided throughout the park. All refuse areas shall be screened with a solid,
durable material meeting the requirements of this ordinance.
Sec. 30-82-10 Manufactured Housing Subdivision
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum tract size: 5 acres
2. Use limitations: Areas designated on the approved preliminary plan as a manufactured
housing subdivision shall be limited to class A or B manufactured home dwellings and
single family dwellings. Where a combination of manufactured homes and single family
dwellings are proposed, at least sixty percent (60°~) of the lots shall be reserved
exclusively for class A or B manufactured homes.
3. All lots shall front on a local public street; direct access to a major collector or arterial
street outside the subdivision (as determined by the Roanoke County Transportation
Plan), shall not be permitted.
4. Plat designation: Plats recorded for a manufactured housing subdivision shall contain
the following statement, "This is a manufactured housing subdivision" and shall
indicate which lots are reserved exclusively for class A or B manufactured homes.
5. Manufactured home installation: The manufactured home shall be anchored to
a concrete pad or be attached to a permanent foundation, in accordance with
the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Unless permanently attached to
a foundation, the manufactured home shall also be completely skirted with a
durable non-reflective material.
129 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Res.
e. Shall be of an appropriate nature and location to serve the residents of the multi-
family development.
(C) Additional standards in the AV district:
1. Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet for the first dwelling unit, plus 5,000 square feet
for each additional unit.
2. When adjoining a lot containing a single family dwelling, a Type C buffer yard as
described in Section 30-92 shall be provided.
(D) Additional standards in the R-3 district:
1. Minimum lot size: 7,200 square feet for the first dwelling unit, plus 3,630 square feet
for each additional unit.
2. Maximum density: 12 dwelling units per acre.
3. The property shall be served by public sewer and water.
4. Common open space and recreational areas required: 5 percent of the total lot area
for parcels of 2 to 5 acres, and 10 percent for parcels over 5 acres. No open space
is required for parcels under 2 acres.
(E) Additional standards in the R-4 district:
1. Minimum lot size: 7,200 square feet for the first dwelling unit, plus 1,815 square feet
for each additional unit.
2. Maximum density: 24 dwelling units per acre.
3. The property shall be served by public sewer and water.
4. Common open space and recreational areas required: 5 percent of the total lot area
for parcels of 2 to 5 acres, and 10 percent for parcels over 5 acres. No open space
is required for parcels under 2 acres.
(F) General Standards in the C-1 district, independent of the General standards above:
1. The multi-family use shall be allowed only in the same structure as, and in conjunction
with, an associated civic, office or commercial use type.
2. The civic, office or commercial use type must occupy at least 50 percent of the gross
floor area of the structure."
131 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Sec. 30-82-13 Single Family, Attached
Use Standards-Res.
(A) Intent -The following provisions are intended to offer greater flexibility in providing a
variety of housing options to meet the changing demands and needs of the public. The standards
below are intended to accommodate new developments of attached single family dwellings, as
well as to allow attached single family dwellings as in-fill development on scattered sites in
existing residential areas.
(B) General standards within a common development containing three or more acres:
1. The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the District
Regulations may be reduced up to 20 percent, provided:
a. The lot is an interior lot and does not adjoin a lot outside of the common
development designated for attached single family dwellings; OR,
b. The lot adjoins a Type C or greater buffer yard; OR,
c. The lot adjoins land zoned as commercial or industrial.
2. Minimum side yard opposite the common lot line between two attached dwellings: 10
feet.
3. A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted
to the Administrator. The Administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the
official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for attached dwellings.
(C) General standards on existing lots or in new developments containing less than three
acres:
1. Minimum side yard opposite the common lot line between two attached dwellings: 10
feet.
Sec. 30-82-14 Townhouses
(A) Intent - It is the intent of this section that townhouses be allowed in areas where they
are or may be appropriately intermingled with other compatible types of housing. The purpose of
the following design standards is to ensure the efficient, economical, comfortable and convenient
use of land and open space and serve the public purposes of zoning by providing an alternative
to conventional arrangements of yards and buildable areas.
(B) General standards:
1. All townhouse developments shall be served by public sewer and water.
133 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Use Standards-Res.
8. Maximum number in a group or block of townhouses: 4 townhouse units.
9. When a townhouse development adjoins a single family dwelling, a Type C buffer yard
as described more fully in Section 30-92 shall be provided.
(D) Additional standards in the R-2 and R-3 districts:
1. Maximum gross density: 12 townhouse units per acre.
2. Minimum parcel size: 7,200 square feet for the first dwelling unit, plus 3,630 square
feet for each additional unit.
3. Front yard setbacks for each group of townhouse units: an average of 15 feet, and not
be less than 10 feet for any individual townhouse unit. No common parking area,
common driveway or street right-of-way shall be permitted within the required front
yard area.
4. Aside yard setback of 15 feet shall be provided for each end residence in any group
of townhouses adjoining a property boundary of the development. Where a group of
townhouses adjoin a private drive or parking area or walkway intended for the common
use of townhouse occupants, the side yard setback shall be 10 feet.
5. Minimum rear yard setback: 25 feet.
6. Minimum lot size for individual townhouse lots: 2,000 square feet for interior lots and
2,500 square feet for end lots.
7. Minimum width for individual townhouse lots: 18 feet, measured from center of wall
to center of wall or outside end wall.
8. Maximum number in a group or block of townhouses: 10 townhouse units.
(E) Additional standards in the R-4 district:
1. Maximum gross density: 18 townhouse units per acre.
2. Minimum parcel size: 7,200 square feet for the first dwelling unit, plus 2,420 square
feet for each additional unit.
3. Front yard setback for each group of townhouse units: an average of 15 feet, and not
less than 10 feet for any individual townhouse unit. Common parking areas,
driveways, and rights-of-way may be permitted within the front yard setback.
4. Aside yard setback of 15 feet shall be provided for each end residence in any group
of townhouses adjoining a property boundary of the development. Where a group of
townhouses adjoin a private drive or parking area or walkway intended for the common
use of townhouse occupants, the side yard setback shall be 10 feet.
135 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES
Sec. 30-83-1 Cemetery
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum parcel size: 10 acres.
2. No interment shall occur within 25 feet of the property line.
Sec. 30-83-2 Clubs
Use Standards-Civic
(A) In the AV district, when a club adjoins a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in
accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the
residential use type.
Sec. 30-83-3 Community Recreation
(A) General standards:
1. Any outdoor activity area, swimming pool, or ball field or court which adjoins a
residential use type shall be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees in
accordance with Section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use
type. Where night-time lighting of such areas is proposed large evergreen trees shall
be required.
Sec. 30-83-4 Day Care Center
(A) General standards:
1. All Day Care Centers shall comply with the Minimum Standards for Day Care Centers
established by the Virginia Department of Social Services, as may be amended, unless
specifically exempt from those Minimum Standards.
2. A Business License or certificate of zoning compliance to operate a Day Care Center
shall be approved provided that a license to operate a Day Care Center from the
Virginia Department of Social Services is approved prior to beginning operation of the
Center. Failure to maintain a valid license approved by the Virginia Department of
Social Services shall be considered a violation of this ordinance.
Sec. 30-83-5 Educational Facilities
(A) General standards:
1. Any outdoor activity area, ball field or court, or stadium which adjoins a residential use
type shall be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees in accordance with
Section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use type. Where night-
time lighting of such areas is proposed large evergreen trees shall be required.
137 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Civic
2. When a place of religious assembly adjoins a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard
in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided between the parking area(s) and
the residential use type.
(B) In the AG-3, AG-1 and AR districts, the maximum building coverage shall be 20 percent
and the maximum lot coverage 50 percent of the total lot area.
Sec. 30-83-10 Safety Services
(A) General standards:
1. When a safety services establishment adjoins a residential use type, a Type C buffer
yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line which
adjoins the residential use type.
Sec. 30-83-11 Utility Services, Major
(A) General standards:
1. In considering an application for a special use permit, the Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors shall consider the justification for the location of the proposed
utility service and any alternative locations which may be available.
2. The minimum lot size may be reduced as part of approval of the special use permit
provided all setback and yard requirements are met and all other dimensional
requirements are achieved.
3. The height limitation contained in each district maybe increased as part of the approval
of the special use permit, subject to any other height limitation contained in the Section
30-72 and 30-73 of this ordinance.
4. No major utility service shall be located within 100 feet of an existing residence.
5. Except in the I-1 and I-2 districts, outdoor storage of materials and equipment, except
during construction of the utility facility, shall be prohibited in association with a major
utility service, unless specifically requested and approved as part of the special use
permit. In the I-1 and I-2 districts outdoor storage areas shall comply with the
screening provisions contained in Section 30-92-4 (E).
6. Buildings and facilities shall be designed and constructed to be compatible with the
surrounding area, so that these facilities or structures will not adversely affect nearby
properties.
7. Except in the I-1 and I-2 districts, Type E screening and buffering consistent with
Section 30-92 of this Ordinance shall be required, unless specifically modified as a part
of the approved special use permit.
139 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
SEC. 30-84 OFFICE USES
Sec. 30-84-1 General Office
Use Standards-Office
(A) In the AV and NC districts, when a general office use adjoins a residential use type, a
Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line
which adjoins the residential use type.
Sec. 30-84-2 Medical Office
(A) In the AV and NC districts, when a medical office use adjoins a residential use type,
a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line
which adjoins the residential use type.
Sec. 30-84-3 Financiallnstitutions
(A) General standards:
1. All drive-through windows shall conform to the standards for drive-through facilities
contained in Section 30-91-10.
(B) Additional standards in the AV District:
1. When a financial institution adjoins a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in
accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins
the residential use type.
141 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Com.
c. Any spray painting takes place within a structure designed for that purpose and
approved by the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department.
d. Any vehicle awaiting body repair or painting, or is missing major mechanical or
body parts, or has been substantially damaged shall be placed in a storage yard.
The storage yard shall be fully screened from public view and shall be set back
at least 100 feet from any adjoining residential district.
Sec. 30-85-4 Automobile Dealership, Used
(A) General standards:
1. Outdoor display areas in conjunction with automobile sales shall be constructed of the
same materials required for off-street parking areas as required in Public Street and
Parking Desian Standards and Soecifications.
2. A 10 foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to any public street right-of-way.
Within this planting strip, one large deciduous, large evergreen or small deciduous tree
shall be planted every 30 linear feet. Such planting materials shall otherwise comply
with the landscaping requirements contained in Section 30-92.
3. The storage and/or display of motor vehicles in the planting strip required above shall
be prohibited.
4. Exterior display or storage of new or used automobile parts is prohibited.
5. Any vehicle which is missing major mechanical or body parts or have been substantially
damaged shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened
from public view and shall be set back at least 100 feet from any adjoining residential
district.
Sec. 30-85-5 Automobile Repair Services, Major
(A) General standards:
1. All vehicles stored on the premises in excess of 72 hours shall be placed in a storage
yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from public view and shall be set back
at least 100 feet from any adjoining residential district.
2. Body and fender repair services shall be subject to the following:
a. The repair facilities are at least 150 feet from any adjoining residential district.
b. Any spray painting takes place within a structure designed for that purpose and
approved by the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department.
3. Exterior display or storage of new or used automobile parts is prohibited.
143 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Com.
4. Guests may stay no more than 14 consecutive nights in any one calendar year. The
operator of the bed and breakfast shall maintain a log of all guests, including their
name, address, license plate number, and length of stay, and shall make the log
available to county staff upon request.
5. Meals shall be provided only to overnight guests and no cooking shall be permitted in
guest rooms.
6. Required parking areas for guests and employees shall be provided on-site.
7. Health Department approval for sewage disposal, water supply and kitchen facilities
shall be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance.
8. The site shall front directly on and have direct access to a publicly owned and
maintained street.
Sec. 30-85-9 Campground
(A) General standards:
1. The minimum area for a campground shall be 10 contiguous acres.
2. Each campsite shall be set back a minimum distance of 50 feet from the perimeter
property line of the campground.
3. The maximum density shall be 14 sites per gross acre. Each campsite designed for
recreational vehicles shall have a minimum space of 2,000 square feet with a minimum
width of 30 feet. Areas devoted solely for tent camping shall provide at least 400
square feet per campsite.
4. Vacation cottages may be constructed within a campground provided that a minimum
land area of 4,000 square feet is designated solely for the first dwelling unit in a
cottage, with an additional 2,000 square feet of land area provided for each additional
dwelling unit within the cottage. The maximum floor area of a cottage shall be 30
percent of the site.
5. The primary access road shall be paved with a Category I surface in accordance with
the standards contained in the Public Street and Parkins Design Standards and
Soecifications. Such paving shall extend from the public street right-of-way to the
entrance station. Interior roads and access to individual sites shall consist at a
minimum of an all weather gravel surface. All interior roads shall be 18 feet minimum
width for two-way travel or 10 feet minimum width for one-way travel. No campsite
shall have direct access to a public street.
6. One Class A or Class B manufactured home, established pursuant to this ordinance,
may be located in a campground as a caretaker's residence.
145 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Com.
shall be planted every 30 linear feet. Such plantings shall other comply with the
landscaping requirements contained in Section 30-92.
2. The storage and/or display of goods and materials in the planting strip required above
shall be prohibited.
Sec. 30-85-13 Convenience Store
(A) General Standards:
1. Limited sale of foods prepared on the premises may be allowed provided no more than
20 percent of the floor areas is devoted to seating facilities. Seating areas in excess
of this shall constitute a fast food restaurant.
2. Exterior display of merchandise for sale is allowed under the following conditions:
a. On a paved walkway within three feet of the building.
b. Ice machines and soft drink vending machines, in operating condition, shall be
stored under roofed areas.
3. The display of vehicles "for sale" is prohibited.
(B) Additional standards in the NC district:
1. No convenience store shall exceed 2,000 square feet of gross floor area.
2. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section
30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
(C) Additional standards in the AV District:
1. No convenience store shall exceed 3,000 square feet of gross floor area.
2. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section
30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
Sec. 30-85-14 Equipment Sales and Rentals
(A) General standards:
1. A 10 foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to any public street right-of-way.
Within this planting strip, one large deciduous, large evergreen or small deciduous tree
shall be planted every 30 linear feet. Such plantings shall other comply with the
landscaping requirements contained in Section 30-92.
2. The storage and/or display of goods and materials in the planting strip required above
shall be prohibited.
147 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Use Standards-Com.
2. Animal waste shall disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Department of Health
3. Crematoria or land burial of animals in association with a commercial kennel shall be
prohibited.
(B) Additional standards in the AG-3, AG-1, AR and AV districts:
1. The minimum area required for a commercial kennel shall be 2 acres.
2. All facilities associated directly with the commercial kennel, whether indoors or
outdoors, shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from any property line.
3. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section
30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
4. The site shall front on and have direct access to a publicly owned and maintained
street.
(C) Additional standards in the C-2 district:
1. All outdoor runs, training areas and pens associated with a commercial kennel shall be
set back a minimum of 100 feet from any property line.
Sec. 30-85-19 Mini-warehouse
(A) General standards:
1. The minimum lot size shall be 2 acres.
2. The minimum front yard setback shall be 35 feet.
3. No security fencing, security gate or other obstruction to vehicle access shall be
permitted in the required front yard setback or in any buffer yard required pursuant to
Section 30-92.
4. All interior driveways shall be at least 26 feet wide when cubicles open onto one side
only and at least 30 feet wide when cubicles open onto both sides to accommodate
loading and unloading at individual cubicles. Adequate turning radiuses shall be
provided, where appropriate, fora 30 foot long single unit truck or moving van.
Materials and design shall otherwise conform to the standards contained in Public
Street and Parking Design Standards Manual.
5. No door openings for any cubicle shall be constructed facing any residentially zoned
property.
149 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Com.
2. The storage and/or display of recreational vehicles in the planting strip required above
shall be prohibited.
3. Any recreational vehicle which is missing major mechanical or body parts or has been
substantially damaged shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully
screened from public view and shall be set back at least 100 feet from any adjoining
residential district.
Sec. 30-85-22 Restaurant, Family
(A) In the AV district:
1. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section
30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
2. Health Department approval for sewage disposal, water supply and kitchen facilities
shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for a family restaurant.
Sec. 30-85-23 Restaurant, General
(A) In the AV district:
1. When adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard in accordance with Section
30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins the residential use type.
2. Health Department approval for sewage disposal, water supply and kitchen facilities
shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for a family restaurant.
Sec. 30-85-24 Restaurant, Drive-In or Fast Food
(A) General standards:
1. All drive-through windows shall comply with the standards for drive-through facilities
contained in Section 30-91-10.
Sec. 30-85-25 Truck Stop
(A) General standards:
1. The truck stop site shall be a minimum of 10 acres.
151 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Ind.
d. Specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property
lines.
e. Limit the hours of operation.
Sec. 30-86-3 Custom Manufacturing
(A) General standards:
1. A custom manufacturing establishment shall meet all the requirements for a principal
structure.
2. All activities associated with a custom manufacturing establishment, other than loading
and unloading, shall be conducted within an enclosed building.
(B) Additional standards in the AG-3, AG-1 and AV districts:
1. Maximum square footage for a custom manufacturing establishment: 3,000 square
feet.
2. When adjoining a residential use type on an adjoining lot, a Type C buffer yard in
accordance with Section 30-92 shall be provided along the property line which adjoins
the residential use type.
3. The site shall front directly on and have direct access to a publicly owned and
maintained street.
(C) Additional standards in the AG-3 and AG-1 districts:
1. The custom manufacturing establishment shall be accessoryto a single family dwelling.
2. No custom manufacturing establishment shall be located on lot containing less than
three (3) acres.
Sec. 30-86-4 Landfill, Construction Debris
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum parcel size: 20 acres.
2. A Type F buffer yard shall be provided in accordance with Section 30-92.
3. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all of the regulations
of the Virginia Department of Waste Management, include special conditions of any
landfill permit, for construction debris landfills.
153 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Ind.
2. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all regulations of the
Virginia Department of Waste Management, include special conditions of any landfill
permit.
3. In considering a special use permit, in addition to the above standards and the general
standards contained in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, the Board may consider and
set standards for the following:
a. The surface materials required for the access road, and length from the public
road this surface treatment is required.
b. Specific measures to control dust on the site.
c. Specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property
lines.
d. Limit the hours of operation.
e. Limitations on the types of materials to be landfilled.
The frequency at which fill material shall be covered.
g. Measures to insure adequate security of the site.
Sec. 30-86-6 Landfill, Sanitary
(A) General standards:
1. Minimum parcel size: 50 acres.
2. A Type F buffer yard shall be provided in accordance with Section 30-92.
3. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all of the regulations
of the Virginia Department of Waste Management, include special conditions of any
landfill permit, for sanitary landfills.
4. In addition to the application requirements for a special use permit, a Master Plan of
the proposed development and use of the site shall be submitted for consideration.
This Plan shall specify all physical changes and improvements to the property, areas
proposed for landfilling activities including a phasing plan with time frames for the
landfilling activities, methods for controlling drainage, run-off and leachate, erosion and
sediment control measures to be employed during development of the site, an
evaluation of the impact of the proposed activity on groundwater resources, methods
for securing the site from illegal entry, proposed access routes and impacts on public
roads, and proposed closure plan and eventual re-use of the site.
155 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Sec. 30-86-8 Resource Extraction
(A) General standards:
Use Standards-Ind.
1. No surface mining or extraction activity shall be conducted within 100 feet of the
exterior property line nor within 200 feet of any residential property or planned
residential subdivision. The setback shall not be used for any purpose during the period
of excavation, including overburden and spoil storage, except the minimum necessary
for access roads.
2. Access to the site shall be located so that truck traffic does not travel through any
planned residential development, and shall otherwise be located to have as little as
possible impact on residentially developed areas.
3. Access roads shall be maintained in a dust free manner. All access roads shall be
constructed so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles with public streets
and roads.
4. Off street parking areas adequate for all employees' vehicles and trucks shall be
provided.
5. In addition to the application requirements for a special use permit, a Master Plan of
the proposed site shall be submitted for consideration. This Plan shall specify all
physical changes or improvements to the property, methods for controlling drainage,
run-off, and potential ponding on the site, erosion and sediment control measures to
be employed, an evaluation of the impact of the proposed activity on groundwater
resources, methods for securing the site from illegal entry, proposed access routes and
impacts on public roads, a phasing plan including time frames for the extraction
activities, and proposed reclamation and re-use of the site upon completion of the
mining or excavation activity.
Sec. 30-86-9 Scrap and Salvage Yards
(A) General standards:
1. All scrap and salvage materials, and all associated vehicles and equipment stored on
the premises overnight shall be placed in a totally enclosed building or in a storage
yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from surrounding views in accordance
with Section 30-92, and shall be set back at least 100 feet from any adjoining
residential district.
Sec. 30-86-10 Transfer Station
(A) General standards:
The site development and operation shall be in accordance with all of the regulations
of the Virginia Department of Waste Management, including special conditions, for a
transfer station.
157 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Use Standards-Misc.
SEC. 30-87 MISCELLANEOUS USES
Sec. 30-87-1 Aviation Facilities, Private
(A) General standards:
1. Written approval shall be obtained from the State Department of Aviation, and when
located within 5 miles of any commercial airport, written approval from the Federal
Aviation Administration.
2. No flight strip or heliport shall be located within 500 feet of any adjoining residential
structure, other than residences planned in conjunction with the private aviation
facility.
3. Buildings and structures, such as hangers and maintenance sheds, shall be considered
accessory uses to the private airport, but shall otherwise comply with all requirements
for a principal building or structure.
4. Nighttime use and operation of a private airport shall be prohibited unless specifically
approved as part of the special use permit.
Sec. 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower
(A) General standards:
1. The maximum height of any broadcasting tower shall be made a condition of the
special use permit.
2. The minimum setback requirement from the base of the tower to any property line
abutting a residential use or district shall be equal to 110 percent of the height of the
tower, measured from the closest structural member of the tower.
3. The minimum set back from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any
other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be 50 feet and
in all other instances shall be no less than 25 feet.
4. More than one tower shall be permitted provided all setback requirements have been
met.
5. Towers shall be illuminated as required by the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), but no lighting shall be incorporated if not required by the FCC, other than
essential security lighting.
6. Any tower proposed within two miles from any general or commercial airport, or
located at a ground elevation at or above 2000 feet, average mean sea level, shall be
referred to the Federal Aviation Administration for review and comment. Comments
shall also be solicited from the operator/manager of any commercial airport which may
be affected.
159 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV
Use Standards-Misc.
than 10 percent of the total paved area. They shall be planned, designed and located
to channel traffic flow, facilitate stormwater management, and define and separate
parking areas and aisles. Each landscaped area shall be planted with a deciduous tree
with a minimum caliper of one inch at the time of planting in accordance with Section
30-92.
Sec. 30-87-5 Shooting Ranges, Outdoor
(A) General standards:
1. The site or area used as a shooting range or match shall be fenced, posted every 50
feet or otherwise restricted so that access to the site is controlled to insure the safety
of patrons, spectators and the public at large.
2. The Police Chief of Roanoke County shall review and approve the design and layout of
any shooting range or match as to its safety to patrons of the range as well as
surrounding property owners. As a general guide line, the following distances shall be
maintained unless modified in writing by the County Police Chief:
a. The minimum distance from any firing point measured in the direction of fire to
the nearest property line shall not be less than 300 feet;
b. Where a backstop is utilized to absorb the discharged load, the minimum
distance may be 200 feet; and,
c. No firing point shall be located within 100 feet of an adjoining property line.
161 6/15/92
ARTICLE IV Accessory Uses
2. Accessory dwellings commonly associated with or necessitated by the location and
operation of the principal use.
3. Food services operated incidental to the principal use and operated primarily for the
convenience of employees, residents or users of the principal use. Typical examples
include cafeterias, and dining halls.
4. Convenience commercial facilities clearly incidental to the principal use and operated
primarily for the convenience of employees, residents, and users of the principal use.
Typical examples include museum gift shops, college bookstores, or snack bars clearly
incidental to the principal use.
5. Other uses and activities necessarily and customarily associated with purpose and
function of civic use types, as determined by the Administrator.
Sec. 30-88-4 Accessory Uses: Office Use Types
(A) Office use types may include the following accessory uses, activities or structures on
the same site or lot:
1. Parking for the principal use.
2. Recreational facilities available only to the employees of the office use type.
3. Day care facilities available only to the employees of the office use type.
4. Other uses and activities necessarily and customarily associated with purpose and
function of office use types, as determined by the Administrator.
5. One accessory dwelling unit occupied by employees responsible for the security of the
use.
Sec. 30-88-5 Accessory Uses: Commercial Use Types
(A) Commercial use types may include the following accessory uses, activities or structures
on the same site or lot:
1. Parking for the principal use.
2. Accessory storage buildings or areas.
3. One accessory dwelling unit occupied by employees responsible for the security of the
use.
4. Other uses and activities necessarily and customarily associated with purpose and
function of commercial use types, as determined by the Administrator.
163 6/15/92
Article V
ARTICLE V -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SEC. 30-90 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Site Plans
(A) A site development plan shall be required and shall be submitted for the following:
1. New development in every zoning district, including uses approved as special uses,
except for single family and two family dwelling units on individual lots.
2. The conversion of any single family or two family dwelling unit to any other use, or a
higher intensity residential use, or the conversion of any building or property to a
different use category, (e.g., commercial to industrial)
3. New public buildings, except for minor utility services.
4. Uses involving a structure requiring review by the Commission under section 15.1-456
of the Code of Virginia, as amended.
5. Additions or modifications to buildings or uses, except single family or two family
dwelling units, that result in a 500 square foot or greater increase in the impervious
area of the site.
6. The conversion of any property from fee-simple ownership to a condominium form of
ownership.
7. The use or development of any parcel conditionally rezoned, where any of the
conditions accepted and attached to the parcel apply to the physical arrangement or
design of the site.
(B) Site development plans required by the County shall be prepared by a professional
engineer, architect or land surveyor who is registered by the Commonwealth of Virginia and is
conducting their practice in accordance with Section 54.1-400 et seq. of the Code of Virginia, as
amended. More stringent requirements may be established by the Roanoke County Code or the
Code of Virginia. This requirement may be waived by the Director of Engineering and Inspections
if the type, scale and/or location of the proposed development does not necessitate such plans.
(C) Any use or development permitted by this ordinance for which a site development plan
is not required, shall submit a plot plan in accord with the standards contained in Section 30-100-
1 of this ordinance.
Sec. 30-90-1 Information Required
(A) The following information shall be required on site development plans submitted to the
County for review:
1. Location of the lot or parcel by vicinity map. Site development plans shall also contain
a north arrow, original date, revision dates and graphical scale.
165 6/15/92
Article V Site Plans
16. The location of proposed or required fire lanes. and signs.
17. The existing topography of the parcel prior to grading, and the proposed finished
contours of the site with a maximum of two foot contour intervals.
18. Detailed utility plans and calculations shall be submitted for sites for which public
water or sewer will be provided or for sites on which existing utilities will be modified.
The Director of Utilities shall have the authority to set the standards for such plans.
19. An erosion and sedimentation control plan and detail sheet shall be submitted for site
developments involving the grading disturbance of greater than 10,000 square feet or
area, or 1000 cubic yards of material.
20. A detailed stormwater management plan and calculations shall be submitted. The
Director of Engineering and Inspections shall determine the requirements for such
plans. At a minimum these plans shall contain information that shows:
a. Spot elevations of proposed building corners, finished floor elevations, entrances,
driveway and parking lot limits, and culvert inverts,
b. The benchmark location and USGS elevation, where available.
21. The location of existing and proposed freestanding signs on the parcel.
22. The location and type of proposed exterior site lighting, including height of poles and
type of fixtures.
23. The location of any 100 year flood plain and floodway on the site, and the relationship
of buildings and structures to this floodplain and floodway. See Section 30-74.
24. The location of required or proposed buffer yards, screening, fencing, and site
landscaping. The type and size of the plant materials and screening to be used shall be
provided. In addition, the relationship of these materials to physical site improvements
and easements shall be provided.
(B) The Director of Engineering and Inspections may waive the requirement that any of this
information be shown on a submitted plan, if in his opinion such information is not necessary to
insure conformance with County ordinances or standards.
Sec. 30-90-2 Format of Plans
(A) Site plans shall be submitted on sheets no greater in size than 30 by 42 inches. A
sheet size of 24 by 36 inches is preferred. The scale of the plans shall not be greater than one
inch equals 10 feet (1 " =10'), or less than one inch equals fifty feet (1 " = 50'). Plans shall be
designed using an engineering scale. The Director of Engineering and Inspections may approve
a lesser scale such as 1 " =100' provided sufficient detail is provided to insure compliance with
all applicable requirements of this Ordinance and any other requirement or Ordinance of the County
or Commonwealth.
167 6/15/92
Article V Site Plans
(I) No change, revision, or erasure shall be made on any pending or approved site
development plan, nor on any accompanying data sheet where approval has been endorsed on the
plan or sheets, unless authorization for such changes is granted in writing by the Director of
Engineering and Inspections. The Director shall consult with all applicable departments or
agencies prior to approving the change.
Sec. 30-90-4 Minimum Standards and Improvements Required
(A) Any improvement required by this ordinance, or any other ordinance of Roanoke County
shall be installed at the cost of the developer unless other agreements have been reached between
the developer, the County, the Virginia Department of Transportation, and/or any other
governmental agency.
(B) Prior to the approval of a site development plan the applicant shall execute an
agreement to construct required or proposed improvements located within public rights-of-way or
easements or any such improvement connected to any public facility. The applicant shall also file
a performance guarantee with surety acceptable to the County in the amount of the estimated
cost of the improvements plus ten percent contingency, as determined by the Director of
Engineering and Inspections. The owner's performance guarantee shall not be released until the
construction has been inspected and accepted by the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation, as applicable.
(C) Proposed lot sizes, buildings or uses shown on site development plans shall conform
to the provisions of this ordinance. Nonconforming lots of record, buildings or uses may be
developed in accordance with Section 30-23 of this ordinance.
(D) Proposed parking areas, travel lanes, access drives and loading spaces shown on site
development plans shall be designed, located and constructed in accord with Section 30-91 of this
ordinance.
(E) Utilities shown on site development plans shall conform to applicable County
ordinances, as determined by the Director of Utilities.
(F) Stormwater management facilities shown on site development plans shall conform to
applicable County ordinances as determined by the Director of Engineering and Inspections.
(G) Erosion and sedimentation control plans shall be designed and implemented in accord
with the provisions of Chapter 8 of the County code.
(H) Proposed exterior site lighting shall be in accord with Section 30-94 of this ordinance.
(I) Required buffer yards, screening and/or landscaping shown on site development plans
shall be designed and located in accord with Section 30-92 of this ordinance.
169 6/15/92
Article V
Total Off-street Parking
Required
1 to 25
26 to 50
51 to 75
76 to 100
101 to 150
151 to 200
201 to 300
301 to 400
401 to 500
501 to 1000
1001 and over
Parking for Disabled
Required
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2 percent of total
20 plus 1 for each 100 over
1000
Parking
(B) All spaces for disabled parking shall have minimum dimensions of 13 feet by 20 feet.
(C) Spaces for disabled parking shall be the closest to a building entrance for which they
are provided, and shall be connected thereto by a paved surface with no less than 5 feet of
unobstructed width. At no point shall the gradient exceed one foot rise or fall in 20 feet, except
in the case of ramps which shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code
Sec. 30-91-4 Permitted Locations
(A) Off-street parking spaces that are located on the ground and open to the sky may be
located in any required yard unless otherwise required for screening, buffering, landscaping or
other provisions in the County Code.
(B) Parking structures and carports shall be subject to the minimum yard and setback
requirements applicable in the zoning district in which the structure is located.
Sec. 30-91-5 Access
(A) All off-street parking spaces shall provide safe convenient access to a street. If any
such spaces are contiguous to a public street, the public street side of such space shall be curbed.
(B) Whenever a development abuts a street which is included in the State System of
Primary Highways or a road designed as "Arterial" in the adopted Roanoke County Transportation
Plan, or the latest Statewide Highway Plan, the following conditions shall be met:
1. A reverse frontage and/or combined access concept shall be utilized such that no site
has exclusive access to the arterial highway at intervals of less than one access point
every 500 feet, measured from the center line of the entrance(s).
2. If reverse frontage or combined access cannot be provided, the site shall be limited to
one exclusive access point, or for shopping centers, one exclusive access point per
500 feet of road frontage.
171 6/15/92
Article V Parking
2. Dimensions for compact space are set forth in Section 207.08 of the Public Street and
Parking Design Standards and Specifications.
3. If the total parking requirement is 20 to 100 spaces, 25 percent of the spaces may be
designated for small/compact car use.
4. If the total parking requirement is more than 100 spaces, 30 percent of the spaces may
be designated for small/compact car use.
Sec. 30-91-8 General Criteria for Determining Parking
(A) When a building includes a combination of uses as set forth in this Section, the required
parking will be the sum of the required parking for each use.
(B) Where the parking requirement for a particular use is not defined in this Section, and
where no similar use is listed, the Administrator shall determine the number of spaces to be
provided based on requirements for similar uses, location of the proposed use, expected demand
and traffic generated by the proposed use, and appropriate traffic engineering and planning criteria
and information. Determination of requirements may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
(C) All references to square feet (sq. ft.) in the parking requirements below shall mean the
square feet of gross floor area, unless specifically stated otherwise.
(D) All reference to maximum occupancy shall mean the maximum occupancy as
determined pursuant to Section 806.0 of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
(E) Where a fractional space results during calculation of required parking, the required
number of parking spaces shall be construed to be the next highest whole number.
Sec. 30-91-9 Minimum Parking Required
USE TYPE
(A) Agricultural and Forestrv Use Tvpes
Agriculture
Commercial Feedlots
Farm Employee Housing
Forestry Operations
Stable, Private
Stable, Commercial
Wayside Stand
PARKING REQUIRED
No requirement
No requirement
2 spaces per dwelling unit
No requirement
No requirement
1 space per employee on major shift, plus
1 spaces for every four animals stabled
1 space per 100 sq. ft., 3 spaces minimum
173
6/15/92
Article V Parking
USE TYPE PARKING REQUIRED
Correction Facilities See Schedule B
Crisis Center 1 space per 2 persons of residential
capacity
Cultural Services 1 space per 300 square feet
Day Care Center 1 space per employee on major shift, plus
1 spaces per 20 students, plus 1 space for
each vehicle associated with facility
Educational Facilities, See Schedule B
College/University
Educational Facilities, See Schedule B, but no less than one space
Primary/Secondary per employee on major shift, plus 1 space
per each 4 students in 1 1 th and 12th
grades
Family Day Care Home 1 space per non-resident employee
Guidance Services 1 space per 250 sq. ft.
Halfway House 1 space per 2 persons of residentia!
capacity
Home for Adults 1 space per 3 residents, plus 1 space for
each employee on major shift
Life Care Facility See Schedule B
Nursing Home 1 space per 3 residents, plus 1 space for
each employee on major shift
Park And Ride Facility No requirement
Post Office See Schedule A
Public Assembly 1 space per 4 seats or similar
accommodations provided
Public Maintenance And See Schedule A
Service Facilities
Public Parks And See Schedule B
Recreational Areas
Safety Services 3 spaces per vehicle based at facility
Religious Assembly 1 space per 4 seats in principal place of
worship
175 6/15/92
Article V
USE TYPE
Car Wash
Clinic
Commercial Indoor Amusement
Commercial Indoor Entertainment
Parking
PARKING REQUIRED
1 space per employee on major shift, plus
required stacking spaces
3 spaces per examination or treatment
room, plus 1 space per employee on major
shift including doctors
1 space per 3 persons based on maximum
occupancy load
1 space per 4 seats or similar
accommodations, plus 1 space per two
employees on major shift
Commercial Indoor Sports
And Recreation
Bowling alley
Swimming Pool
Tennis and Other Court Games
Other indoor sports
4 spaces per alley, plus 1 space per
employee on major shift
1 space per 100 sq. ft. of water surface
4 spaces per court
1 space per 3 persons based on maximum
occupancy load, plus one space per
employee on major shift
Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
Commercial Outdoor Sports
And Recreation
1 space per 3 persons based on maximum
occupancy load, plus one space per
employee on major shift
Miniature Golf 1.5 spaces per hole
Swimming Pool 1 space per 100 sq. ft. of water surface
Tennis and Other Court Games 4 spaces per court
Other outdoor sports 1 space per 3 persons based on maximum
occupancy load, plus one space per
employee on major shift
Communications Services
1 space per 300 square feet, plus 1 space
per company vehicle
Construction Sales And Services
Consumer Repair Services
Convenience Store
See Schedule A
1 space per 300 square feet
1 space per 200 square feet for 1st 1000
sq. ft., plus 1 space for each additional
175 sq. ft., which may include any gas
pump spaces provided 5 other spaces are
furnished
177
6/15/92
Article V
USE TYPE
Restaurant, Family
Restaurant, Drive-in
Or Fast Food
With seats
With out seats
Retail Sales
Shopping center
Furniture, Carpet, and
Appliances
All others
Studio, Fine Arts
Surplus Sales
Truck Stop
Veterinary Hospital/Clinic
(F) Industrial Use Tvoes
Asphalt Plant
Construction Yards
Custom Manufacturing
Industry, Type I
Industry, Type II
Industry, Type III
Landfill, Construction Debris
Landfill, Rubble
Landfill, Sanitary
Meat Packing And Related
Industries
Parking
PARKING REQUIRED
1 space per 4 seats, plus 1 space per two
employees on major shift
1 space per 4 seats, plus 1 space per 4
employees on major shift, plus required
stacking space
1 space per 60 sq. ft., plus required
stacking space
4.4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.
1 space per 500 sq. ft.
1 space per 200 sq. ft.
See Schedule B
1 space per 100 sq. ft. of sales area
accessible to the public
See Schedule B
1 space per 300 sq. ft.
See Schedule B
See Schedule A
See Schedule A
See Schedule A
See Schedule A
See Schedule A
See Schedule B
See Schedule B
See Schedule B
1 space per employee on major shift
179
6/15/92
Article V Parking
Indoor or Outdoor Storage or 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft.
Warehousing
Schedule B
Specific requirements shall be determined by the Administrator based on requirements for
similar uses, location of proposed use, expected demand and traffic generated by the proposed
use, and appropriate traffic engineering and planning criteria and information. Determination of
requirements may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Sec. 30-91-10 Stacking Spaces and Drive-Through Facilities
(A) Stacking spaces shall be provided for any use having adrive-through facility or areas
having drop-off and pick-up areas. The following general standards shall apply to all stacking
spaces and drive-through facilities:
1. Stacking spaces and lanes for drive-through stations shall not impede on and off site
traffic movements, shall not cross or pass through off street parking areas, and shall
not create a potentially unsafe condition where crossed by pedestrian access to a
public entrance of a building.
2. Drive through lanes shall be separated from off-street parking areas. Individual lanes
shall be striped, marked or otherwise distinctly delineated.
3. Approach lanes for drive-through facilities shall have the following minimum widths:
a. One lane = 12 feet.
b. Two or more lanes = 10 feet per lane.
4. All drive-through facilities shall be provided with a bypass lane with a minimum width
of 10 feet.
5. Alleys or driveways in residentially zoned areas adjacent to drive-through facilities shall
not be used for circulation of customer traffic.
6. Each stacking space shall be a minimum of 10 feet by 20 feet.
(B) Stacking spaces shall be provided as follows:
1. Financial institutions with drive-through windows: 8 stacking spaces for the first drive-
through window and 2 stacking spaces for each additional window.
2. Car wash: 4 stacking spaces per bay/stall for self-service establishments, and 5
stacking spaces per bay/stall for an automated establishment.
181 6/15/92
Article V Parking
11. All references to square feet (sq. ft.) in the off-street loading requirements below shall
mean the square feet of gross floor area, unless specifically stated otherwise.
Sec. 30-91-12 Minimum Loading Spaces Required
(A) Minimum off-street loading spaces shall comply with the table below for those uses
listed:
REQUIRED NUMBER OF LOADING SPACES
USES
Retail Sales, Personal
Services, New and Used
Automobile Dealerships,
Restaurants,
NUMBER OF LOADING SPACES
Up to 15,000 sq. ft. = 1 space; 15,001 to
40,000 sq. ft. = 2 spaces; 40,001 to 100,000
sq. ft. = 3 spaces; 100,001 to 300,000 sq. ft. _
4 spaces; 300,001 to 1.0 million sq. ft. = 5
spaces; 1.0 million sq. ft. and over = 6 spaces.
Industrial (Type I and II), Up to 40,000 sq. ft. = 1 spaces; 40,001 to
Warehousing and 70,000 sq. ft. = 2 spaces; 70,001 to 110,000
Distribution. sq. ft. = 3 spaces; 110,0001 to 160,000 sq. ft.
= 4 spaces; 160,001 to 240,000 sq. ft. = 5
spaces; Each additional 200,000 sq. ft. = 1
additional space.
General Offices, Financial Up to 40,000 sq. ft. = 1 space; 40,001 to
Institutions, Medical 100,000 sq. ft. = 2 spaces; 100,001 to 300,000
Offices. sq. ft. = 3 spaces; 300,001 sq. ft. and over = 4
spaces.
Hotel/Motel/Motor
Lodge, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes, All
Commercial Recreational
Uses, All Educational
Facilities.
Up to 100,000 sq. ft. = 1 space; 100,001 to
200,000 sq. ft. = 2 spaces; 200,001 sq. ft. and
over = 3 spaces.
183
6/15/92
Article V
Screening & Buffering
2. When a proposed buffer yard has a variation in elevation of greater than 10 vertical
feet at any point, the required screening or landscaping within the yard shall be placed
to maximize the effectiveness of the screening or landscaping, as determined by the
Administrator.
The maximum slope of any required buffer yard shall be 2:1. (Horizontal :Vertical).
Sufficient vegetation and ground cover shall be established and maintained on any
slope to ensure stabilization.
(B) Where screening is required by this ordinance, the following shall apply:
1. Screening shall be visually opaque, and constructed of a durable material. It shall be
installed within a required buffer yard and shall be continuously maintained so as to
meet the intent of this Section.
2. Acceptable screening materials include stockade fences, decorative masonry walls,
brick walls, and earth berms. Alternative materials may be approved, if in the opinion
of the Administrator, their characteristics and design meet the intent and standards of
this Section.
(C) Where landscaping is required by this ordinance, the following shall apply:
1. Existing vegetation within buffer yards shall be considered as a substitute for otherwise
required landscaping, if in the opinion of the Administrator, the type, size, and density
of the existing vegetation complies with the following standards and the intent of this
Section.
2. Where specified, landscaping materials shall be planted in accordance with the on-
center requirements of this Section. If spacing requirements are not specified, required
landscaping shall be arranged within a buffer yard to achieve the intent of this Section.
3. Required evergreen shrubs shall have a minimum height of 18 inches at the time of
planting. These shrubs shall have an ultimate height of not less than 6 feet at
maturity. They shall be planted 5 feet on center or less.
4. Required small evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of 5 feet at the time of
planting. These trees shall have an ultimate height of not less than 15 feet at maturity.
One tree shall be planted for each 15 linear feet of buffer yard.
5. Required large evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of 5 feet at the time of
planting. These trees shall have an ultimate height of not less than 50 feet at maturity.
One tree shall be planted for each 20 linear feet of buffer yard.
6. Required small deciduous shall be species suitable for planting and growth within a
built-environment. Acceptable species shall include dogwoods, bradford pears, and
other dwarf varieties. These trees shall have an ultimate height of 15 feet at maturity.
One tree shall be planted for each 15 feet of buffer yard.
185 6/15!92
Article V
Screening & Buffering
D - 6 foot screening - 35 foot buffer yard
- 25 foot buffer yard - large evergreen trees, small
- large and small evergreen trees evergreen trees, and one row of
evergreen shrubs
E - 8 foot screening - 50 foot buffer yard
- 35 foot buffer yard - large deciduous trees, large
- large deciduous and large evergreen trees, small evergreen
evergreen trees trees, and one row of evergreen
shrubs
F - 8 foot screening - 100 foot buffer yard
- 50 foot buffer yard - 6 large deciduous trees per 100
- 3 large deciduous trees per 100 feet; 10 large evergreen trees per
feet; 5 large evergreen trees per 100 feet; and 15 small evergreen
100 feet; and 7 small evergreen trees per 100 feet.
trees per 100 feet.
(B) Where a new, expanded, or reconfigured parking area is proposed adjacent to a public
street right-of-way, a planting strip shall be established between the parking area and the adjacent
right-of-way. The planting strip shall have a minimum width of six feet. Within this planting strip,
one large deciduous, large evergreen, or small deciduous tree shall be planted every 30 linear feet
along the public street right-of-way. In addition, one evergreen shrub shall be placed in the planting
strip every 5 linear feet.
(C) New parking areas shall include landscaped medians, peninsulas or planter islands in
accordance with the Table below. Such areas shall be planned, designed and located to channel
traffic, facilitate stormwater management, and define and separate parking areas and aisles. Each
landscaped area shall be planted with small deciduous trees with a minimum caliper of one inch
at the time of planting.
PERCENT OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPING
IN PARKING AREAS
Number of I-1 and I-2 All Other
Parking Spaces Di tric Di ri
0 to 24 0 0
25 to 50 0 5 percent
More than 50 5 percent 10 percent
Expansion of existing parking areas shall comply with the requirements above if the expansion
involves the addition of an area equivalent to 10 or more parking spaces and the resultant parking
area has the equivalent of 25 or more spaces. The percent landscaping required above shall be
calculated on the basis of the square footage of new parking area only.
187 6/15/92
Article V
Screening & Buffering
(F) No landscaping or screening shall be required which in the opinion of the Administrator
interferes with traffic safety, or which violates the provisions of Section 30-100-8 of this
ordinance.
189 6/15/92
Article V Signs
Sec. 30-93-3 Exempted Signs
(A) The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within
Roanoke County without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required
for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service:
1. Official traffic signs or similar regulatory devices owned, erected and maintained by a
duly constituted governmental body.
2. Signs required to be displayed or maintained by law or governmental order, rule or
regulation.
3. Memorial tablets or signs, provided they are displayed by a public or quasi-public
agency.
4. Directional signs provided that each such sign does not exceed 5 square feet per sign,
and no such sign shall contain any advertising matter.
5. Street address signs, not exceeding 10 square feet in size.
6. Non-illuminated signs, not more than three square feet in area warning trespassers or
announcing property as posted.
7. Signs displayed on a truck, bus, or other vehicle while in use in the normal conduct of
business. This section shall not be interpreted to permit the parking for display
purposes a vehicle to which a sign is attached or the use of such a vehicle as a
portable sign.
8. Flags and insignias of any government except when displayed in connection with
commercial purposes.
9. On-premises real estate signs in residential or agricultural zoning districts not exceeding
5 square feet in area, or on-premises real estate signs in commercial or industrial zoning
districts not exceeding 16 square feet in area. On-premises real estate signs larger
than these exempted allowances may be installed as temporary signs in accordance
with Section 30-93-8 (B).
10. Clocks that display time and temperature through the use of mechanical means or the
controlled display of lights, provided these devices do not display any other message.
11. Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-
way, and are removed within 14 days after the campaign.
12. Signs displayed between Thanksgiving and Christmas associated with the sale of
Christmas trees and wreaths.
13. Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in Sections 30-93-4
(A) 5. and 7., which shall not be excluded.
191 6/15/92
Article V
Signs
12. Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or
pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering
a public right-of-way from private property.
Sec. 30-93-5 Sign Permits
(A) Except as provided in Section 30-93-3, no sign may be erected or displayed in Roanoke
County without an approved sign permit. Applications for a sign permit maybe obtained from the
Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning. Signs that are not visible from a public right-
of-way do not have to conform to the provisions of Section 30-93-13, District Regulations, and
the square footage of such signs shall not be included when calculating allowable signage on a
lot.
(B) Any owner of a parcel of land upon which a sign is to be displayed, or any authorized
agent of such owner may apply for a sign permit.
(C) Every application for a sign permit shall include a sketch of the property indicating the
lot frontage. The application shall also indicate the square footage of all existing signs on the
property, and the area, size, structure, design, location, lighting, and materials for the proposed
signs. In addition, the Administrator may require that the application contain any other information
that is necessary to ensure compliance with, or effectively administer, these regulations.
(D) Anon-refundable sign permit fee is due and payable with the filing of a sign permit
application. More than one sign on one building or group of buildings located on the same parcel
of land maybe included on one application provided that all such signs be applied for at one time.
A single temporary sign permit may be used for more than one temporary sign or for up to four
30 day display periods per calendar year, provided the temporary signs requested are for the same
business.
(E) After the issuance of an approved sign permit, the applicant may install and display any
such sign or signs approved. Once installed, the Administrator may inspect the sign(s) for
conformance with the approved sign permit and this ordinance. If the displayed sign(s), due to
size, location, height, or number do not conform to the information on the approved sign permit,
or the applicable standards of this ordinance, the Administrator shall notify the applicant in
accordance with Section 30-21.
(F) Any sign permit issued shall be null and void if any sign for which the permit was
issued is not installed in accordance with the permit within 6 months of the date the permit was
approved.
(G) Maintenance, repair, or restoration of nonconforming signs shall be in accordance with
Section 30-93-1 1. If the value of such work exceeds 50 percent of its replacement value, it shall
only be authorized after the approval of a sign permit application.
193 6/15/92
Article V Signs
Sec. 30-93-8 Temporary Signs
(A) Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant
to Section 30-93-5. Except as provided in subsections (B) and (C) below, pertaining to real estate
and construction signs, temporary signs shall comply with the following standards:
1. Each business or use on a lot shall be allowed to display a temporary sign a maximum
of 4 times per calendar year. No business may display temporary signage for more
than 120 days per calendar year. Businesses that wish to display temporary signage
in excess of these provisions may apply for a permanent sign permit which shall be
evaluated against the applicable district standards.
2. Only one portable sign may be displayed on a lot or at a shopping center, at any one
time. Any portable sign displayed shall have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from
the centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line,
whichever is greater.
3. No business or establishment shall display more than two temporary signs
simultaneously and the total square footage of any temporary signs displayed at one
time shall not exceed 60 square feet.
(B) Real estate signs greater than 16 square feet in commercial or industrial zoning districts
or greater than 5 square feet in agricultural or residential zoning districts may be installed on a lot
provided that each such sign does not exceed 96 square feet in area, and has a minimum sign
setback of 15 feet from any public right-of-way. All real estate signs must be removed within 14
days after the property has been sold or leased.
(C) On premises construction signs may be installed on active construction sites. No
construction sign shall exceed 96 square feet in area. Any such sign must have a minimum sign
setback of 15 feet from any public right-of-way. All construction signs must be removed from a
construction site prior to the issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance for the building or
project.
Sec. 30-93-9 Illuminated Signs
(A) Signs may be illuminated either through the use of backlighting or direct lighting
provided the following standards are met:
1. Information on any illumination proposed as part of a sign must be provided by the
applicant on the sign permit application.
2. No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare into or upon any building
other than the building to which the sign is related.
3. No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare on to any adjoining piece of
property, or any adjoining right-of-way.
195 6/15/92
Article V
Sec. 30-93-12 Damaged or Neglected Signs
Signs
(A) The Building Commissioner of Roanoke County shall have the authority to order the
removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses
a clear danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public.
Sec. 30-93-13 District Regulations
(A) AG-3 and AG-1 Zoning Districts
1. Lots within an AG-3 and AG-1 districts shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation
not to exceed one-quarter (.25) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot
frontage.
2. The following signs shall be allowed in the AG-3 and AG-1 districts subject to the
regulations contained herein:
Business Signs Each permitted business shall be allowed a maximum of 50 square feet
of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable
maximum as defined in (1) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that
meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of 25
square feet of signage.
Identification Signs A maximum of 30 square feet shall be allowed per use.
Home Occupation Signs A maximum of 2 square feet shall be allowed per home
occupation, or group of home occupations within one home.
Historic Site Signs A maximum of 15 square feet shall be allowed per sign.
Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 30-93-
8.
3. No freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than 200 feet of lot
frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under
single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located
within 15 feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot.
4. Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the
centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever
is greater.
5. No freestanding sign shall exceed 15 feet in height.
6. No establishment shall be allowed more than 4 signs.
197 6/15/92
Article V Signs
Identification Signs Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as
business signs within this district.
Historic Site Signs A maximum of 15 square feet shall be allowed per sign.
Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 30-93-
8.
3. No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than 100 feet
of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots
under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be
located within 15 feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot.
4. Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the
centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever
is greater.
5. No freestanding sign shall exceed 15 feet in height.
6. No establishment shall be allowed more than 4 signs.
(D) C-1 Office District Regulations
1. Lots within a C-1 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed
one-half t.5) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage.
2. The following signs shall be allowed in the C-1 Office District subject to the regulations
contained herein:
Business Signs Each permitted business in a C-1 district shall be allowed a maximum
of 500 square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not
exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (11 above. Businesses that request sign
permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a
maximum of 25 square feet of signage.
Identification Signs Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as
business signs within this district.
Historic Site Signs A maximum of 15 square feet shall be allowed per sign.
Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 30-93-
8.
3. No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than 100 feet
of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots
under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be
located within 15 feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot.
199 6/15/92
Article V
Signs
2. The following signs shall be allowed in the I-1 and I-2 districts subject to the
regulations contained herein:
Business Signs Each business in an industrial zoning district shall be allowed a
maximum of 300 square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot
does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (1) above. Businesses that
request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall
be allowed a maximum of 25 square feet of signage.
Historic Site Signs A maximum of 15 square feet shall be allowed per sign.
Identification Signs Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as
business signs within this district.
Temporary Signs Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 30-93-
8.
3. No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than 100 feet
of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots
under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be
located within 15 feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot.
4. Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the
centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever
is greater.
5. No freestanding sign shall exceed 25 feet in height.
6. No establishment shall be allowed more than 5 signs.
Sec. 30-93-14 Special Signage Districts and Regulations
(A) Off-Premises Signs Off-premises signs shall be allowed in the C-2, I-1, and I-2 Districts
provided the following location and design standards are met:
1. No off-premises sign shall be located within a 500 foot radius of an existing off-
premises sign, or an off-premises sign for which a valid permit has been obtained, but
has not yet been erected.
2. No off-premises sign shall be located within 200 feet of any residential zoning district,
public square, park, school, library, or religious assembly property.
3. No off-premises sign shall be allowed to be installed on any roof structure, nor shall
any such sign exceed 35 feet in height above the abutting road.
4. Side by side, double and multi-decker off-premises signs shall not be permitted.
201 6/15/92
Article V Signs
Sec. 30-93-16 Graphics
(A) Graphic representations of sign designs and terminology contained in this ordinance
should be viewed as illustrative examples only, and are not intended to be inclusive of all sign
designs.
203 6/15/92
Article V
SEC. 30-100 MISCELLANEOUS
Sec. 30-100-1 Plot Plans
Miscellaneous
(A) A plot plan shall be submitted, prior to the approval of a zoning permit, for any new or
expanded use or development not requiring a site development plan or a concept plan. Plot plans
shall be legibly drawn and shall clearly indicate the area, shape and dimensions of the property
proposed for development. All existing easements, natural water courses, and existing and
proposed improvements shall also be shown on the plan. The plan shall clearly indicate the
minimum distances between existing and proposed uses and all property lines. Proposed access
to the property shall also be shown.
Sec. 30-100-2 Yard, Setback and Height Requirements
(A) The lot area and yards required for any use or structure shall be permanently
maintained, and shall not be counted as the required lot area or yards for any other use or
structure.
(B) Required yards shall remain free of all uses or structures except for the following:
1. Fences, walls and landscaping shall be allowed in yards provided that sight triangles
are maintained per Section 30-100-8. Driveways and parking areas shall also be
allowed.
2. Eaves, cornices, window sills, belt courses, bay windows and chimneys may project
into a required yard a distance not to exceed 2 feet. Cantilevered building overhangs
shall not be allowed to project into a required setback area.
3. Patios and stoops shall be allowed within all required setback areas. Decks shall
comply with all district setback requirements.
4. Accessory structures shall be allowed in accord with the regulations for such
structures.
(C) Height limitations contained in Article III and IV of this ordinance shall not apply to
barns or silos associated with an agricultural use, church spires, belfries, residential chimneys, flag
poles, or residential television antennae, except as may apply in the Airport Overlay District or the
Emergency Communications Overlay District.
Sec. 30-100-3 Frontage Requirements on Cul-de-sacs
(A) The minimum lot frontage on the arc of a cul-de-sac shall be no less than 30 feet in all
zoning districts.
205 6/15/92
Article V Miscellaneous
(C) Nothing in this section shall imply the necessity of removing obstructions within this
sight triangle, provided that these obstructions were installed or planted prior to the effective date
of this ordinance. Routine trimming of shrubbery violating this height requirement shall be
required, if the trimming will not endanger the health of the species.
Sec. 30-100-9 Location and Design of Fences
(A) Except as provided for in Sections 30-92 and 30-100-8, fences may be constructed
in any location, on any lot.
(B) On any lot occupied by a residential use type, fences located in front of the building
line shall not exceed four feet in height.
Sec. 30-100-10 Standards and Procedures for Review of Condominiums
(A) A subdivision plat shall be submitted to Roanoke County for any new residential,
commercial or industrial condominium development, including the conversion of any existing
development to the condominium form of ownership. This plat shall meet all standards for
subdivision plats. Plats shall be reviewed by the Director of Engineering and Inspections who shall
approved the plat provided it meets the provisions of this ordinance and the Roanoke County
Subdivision Ordinance.
(B) An approved owner's association shall be established for all condominium projects
having individually owned structures or units, and common areas and facilities. The purpose of
this association is for the provision of upkeep and maintenance of the common areas and facilities.
The Director of Engineering and Inspections shall review the provisions of the association to insure
compliance with this section.
Sec. 30-100-11 Family Exemption; Permitted Locations and Standards
(A) As may be otherwise provided for in the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, family
exemption subdivisions pursuant to Section 15.1-466 A 12 of the Code of Virginia, as amended,
shall be allowed in all agricultural and residential districts, outside of Planned Residential
Subdivisions.
(B) Such lots shall be exempt from the minimum lot requirements for the district in which
it is located, but shall otherwise comply with the following requirements:
1. The lot shall be approved by the Roanoke CountyNinton Health Department for on-site
sewage disposal, in accordance with Section 17-6 (F) and 17-10 (KI of the County
Subdivision Ordinance, prior to recordation of the lot.
2. The lot shall conform with the Floodplain Overlay district provisions contained in
Section 30-74 of this ordinance.
3. The lot shall be of a size and configuration to allow construction in conformity with
minimum setback requirements of the district in which it is located.
207 6/15/92
a~ (a`,
- ~ ` a ( ,
c5~ (~,
Z ..,.:..
I ~.
w ~ ~ ( ~ .
U
Z
Q
z
O W c*~ i
o? ~
~ i
~ o
z w
N ~ ~ ! l . . . . ~ . .
IIII
W
a
O ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
U ~
Z
w
Y ~
t
~ Q
~~
~ N ~ ~
a ~ a aaa ~ as
0
,,amaaalas
~
I
~ i
~ av~aaa as
a
~ ~
a Q
w
W Q
~' o
~ LL
O
Q
J
U
Q
Q
w
m
c
m
o 'o ~
~~~m
~ ~~~
~ ~ Ewa
~QE ~~o
Q V tL lL
.
I (
a ~ ~
~ ~ .
~ ,
(a a ( ~ a ~ a
. ~ a a ( a w
f E m
c
~
~ m
~
f a v~ a~~~ a ~~ a a a
~ a a a
~ a ~~
L ~.
awa ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ aaa ~ aaa ~~
`~ E
m o
'
ama , a a ~ as ~ acna w
m u~ a ~ a ! a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a i a ~ ~ ~
~
c r
N O
(aaa a f a a i maa ~ acna Q
m
~ c
aw n. a ~ a a s ~ a ~ a ~ ~ W
~ ~£
o ~' $
a ~ aaa ~ a ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~
I s u ~~
U
j a
a aaa ~ a as i a ~ ,~ m a
o-
~ ~. ~.
m o~
~~.$~~
~~~~a
m
o m m c
= Y
m ~I
E~ ~
~ ~ ~ '',
m m 0
~ ~
•> >
a ;o
~ m<
a
a o 0
~ ~ ~
~_ c
Z, ~` p ~. '$ ~ II ~ N
amp G N ~
~ ~ O V
~~~ ~ ~-~ LLQ -~ ~E
t~
U U U Q w ~ a ~~ ~ ~ m a
m o m E o E m ~ c c crn ~
~~ ~o_ ~~
~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ o
'5 '~ '5 '5 '5 ~ ~ ~-° a oo = ~` x z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N
N~ I a a a I a(, a a (~.
- ~ I a a a ~ a~~ a a ~ w.
~ ( ~ aaaa ( aaav~m ~ aan.aa ~ as cna ~ cnaaaa
d ~ ~ a a a m f~, a a a (~.
_ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ! ,
~ I
m
v
w
Z O ~ ~
U
M
O ~ E ~
O O
N ~
Q
O
N i f
O
W
W
a ~
00 ~
'
U n
? o a
w ~ ~
z ~ a~ I a a a ~~ a ~ m ~ m a~ ~~ ~ N£
U ~
O
~ Q I I ,
I (A ~ N { I? C O
N
~
~ h
~ ~ . . ~ N . , , ~ , d , ~ , (A E , t
i O
Q i
a
r? I'
W
a
a to
N
U ~ ~
~~~o
~
~ ~ J
w
m
c ~ ~
~C7~ ~
U
O
O
.~,
Z ~ ~
a d~
~ ~ m a
a~.aa~
~ t o ~ o
~ ~ E E E
= p o 0
adaaa
~ ~ m
_
~ ~
r c
a ~
o
e c
0
1°
~
~
:' -
C ~
~
~ ~. ~ ~
o E v ~ ~
E c ~ ~
~
~
~ a a
g ~
~ ~i
~~ E
o
~i oN
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cyi
~ aw
~
g b b ~ ~ ~
a ~
~
a~a~a o ~
= $~
a~
'
` ~ c ccpp n
a ~ ~
o
m m mm
0 0 0 c c
n
o
~~ ~
~~ ~ m~_~~_
o m E m E ~ii O~
E E E~~
aaa~a8 c c
a m
mm ~~ n
c
c~~ E E~ E~
~~~~~ Y z
N' I maaaa ( m a a I aau~aa 1 aaa
~~ 1.....~..~
z, ~.....~.....i.....~...
~~ ~.....~.....1.....;...
Zo
Q U
Z
~ W ~ . . . . . . , (n . . . . .
O~ ~ ~ 't
~ ~
2 W
N Q
W
a
00 ~i ~~~.
U Z
W F
Y ~
Z J Q ~ ' U1 fA ~ j ~ .
Q Q
o~
Q; ~..~..~.~.N...~
Cy I a I~ m cn ~ N~.
a
w
d
N
W a '~
~ ~
j _
}~--
~~~ ~s
~~~~~
Z ~ ~ U c c
b
W
7
~ C
~ ~
0
a~
m
~~~~~
~~~~
~ Z
v
m o ~
~ m U ~
~~~~~~
~~ ~~
~~~~m
~ ~` q ~ C
~ ~ ~ H
C
F ~
U
O
C ~ W
~E o ~
H C j
m
~~°° Z
o~~
Q~ r g
m
m ~ ~ ~
~F-3 g
cn a to a
m a m a I•
• a m a , •
~ ~ ~ a ~ .
~,..N. ~.
~...~. f.
i
. ~ E ~
S
i ~~
~~
i
. . . ~
' t 2,
...
' ~ d
~ ~ . ~
1 ~ m
W o
..~. ~ ~t
~p
OD ~
c ~
i
~ ~ N ~
U
O
m
.
NN ~ ~
~ ~ ~m
~~
~~
L ~ C
N . ~ N • ~ N Q
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ n
~
'rn .~
-a
r c
~
a o
~
~
~ ~~
b ~ N
r O ~
~ ~ 7
O
~ ~ m p
»
~ ~ ~
a
L
v c~ o `D a ~
~
LL lLL a {L
~ n
n
~ F
io a~ -~ C
o .fie 8 Y 2
!
I QamOa cri~
~'~
N ~pp88
1n
O
O ppp
O O O p
Pj ~ ~ l'~ p
n Oj Z FO ~
p
O
o
N N
N ~
~ ~
- In O O
~ ~ p
8 A n 0
~ ~
~
N p p
IA 8i z
~ ~
~ t
r r ~ ap
^
l7j
vv C
~~
L
N ~ Q H
~ ~
~ iA O O
~~r g ~A In
nr. ~ In N O O
Z F
~~ O
O ~ E.~
W U
U ~ m ~
~ c
Z
o~ 5~ 5~
2525
g~~
p0~p~
~
~,~a
~~
~
0~ V Q ~ ~ ~ W W Z
~ .c
Z W ~ ~ ~
Z ~
N ~ m
~ ~
> T
~ Z Z Z ~
~ p
Z Z g o
l'~ ~ N Z ~ t~0 ~ op
l0 ~ 8 Q
V 0 v
Y Z
Q
.O
p
Q U
a
~ ~ C
~
~
~ ~
~ N
~ ~ m
fn ~
n tC /7 ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ O
fV ~
o a ~ a E
~ ~
m °
c t
m ~
a o
a g
g
~
~~
Q ~
E
X; m c
~
~
~ Q ~ m
W O ~
~ Q 0~ Y C~~ O ~
~
v ~
S
v .:
"~... 7
m ~ ~
C7
~ am
m
~ m
~ m >
~ ~
-'
>> E ~ ~
-~>> E ~ a ~ 'a 'a ~ ~o ~ ~ O W °~°
~ ~
aaa E aaa E ~ oY is ~cg
~ .
~
a~a~ ~ ~ ~ Z
~ ~ ~ 3
~ ~ ~N Q ~ m~ ~ aQ
0
-y
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~_, "~ t
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to rezone 24.090 acres
M-3 to construct and operate an
mix plant, located on the south
Mountain Road, Cave Spring
District, upon the petition
Asphalt Paving Company.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
from M-2 to
asphalt batch
side of Buck
Magisterial
of Virginia
Attached is a letter from Mr. G. Michael Pace, Attorney for
Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, requesting that this rezoning be
deferred until September. Mr. Pace has notified adjoining
landowners of this postponement.
Since this public hearing has already been advertised, there may be
some citizens present at the Board Meeting who are unaware that the
matter has been rescheduled.
Approved by,
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
SENT iY:Q L R M : 5-26-92 10:39AM : 7039828524-~ ?037722030:ti 2
~ ~
~~
703~9i2~s000
14McopN-103~9S2~dS24
GENTRY LaCKE
RAKES & IVK~RE
May Z6, lp9a
VIA F~cs11~lILE AIfD FIItST CL~1.48 ~L
Terrance L. Harrington
Director o! Planning
County qt Roanoke
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Yil1 24018-0798
Re: Virginia Asphalt paving Company Rexoninq
Dear Terry:
10 Fnnktin Road. S.L.
Post OAke Soot 1010
No~noke,v~pnw 24005
This will confirm my telephone conversation today with Tim Hoard
during which I informed him o! Virginia Asphait~s requort that
this matter be postponed until the 8eptembsr meeting o! th•
Planning Cam~tission and the soard of Supervisors. I understand
that the Planning Commission will consider tho application !or
rezoning at its meeting on September 1, and that th• Boaxd o!
8upsrvisvr$ will consider it on September aZ.
By copy of this letter, we era advising the adjoining landowners
listed in the materials accompanying our application of the
postponement.
Thanking you for your consideration in this matter, I am
Yours Sincerely,
GMP,jr/lqh
aC: Robert Q. Cunningham
All Adjoining Landowners
8856/4/002.Itr
r
r
~- a
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE 62392-8 AMENDING THE ROANOItE COUNTY CODE BY
AMENDING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTION OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE
I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE
ROANORE COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In
General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and
readopted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of
Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the
state contained in Title 46.2 and in Article 2 (Section 18.2-226 et
seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except
those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can
have no application to or within the County, are hereby adopted and
incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable
within the County. References to "highways of the state" contained
in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed
to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the
County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to
time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully
as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for
any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse
to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in
no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any
provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed
i
r ~
for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted.
The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws
of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all
amendments to said laws made effective as of the date that this
ordinance is itself effective.
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1,
1992.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc:
File
Circuit Court
G. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Fred L. Hoback, Jr., Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George W. Harris, Jr., Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
John H. Cease, Police Chief
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W.,
Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County
Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering &
Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning &
Zoning
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Perry
Main Library
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. °"" _
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Amendment and readoption of Section 12-8 of the
Roanoke County Code; adopting provisions of Title
46.2 and 18.2 of the Code of Virginia
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The 1992 session of the General Assembly of Virginia adopted
certain amendments to the Motor Vehicle laws of Virginia (Title
46.2).
Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Roanoke County
Code, contains within Article I, a Section 12-8 entitled Adoption
of state law. The purpose of Section 12-8 is to incorporate by
reference those sections of Virginia law found in Title 46.2, Motor
Vehicles, and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2, Crimes, of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which are applicable to the
regulation of traffic within Roanoke County. Amendments as a
result of the 1992 session of the Virginia General Assembly to
Title 46.2 and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, become effective as of July 1, 1992.
The purpose of this ordinance is to make clear that the Board of
Supervisors has taken affirmative action after the General Assembly
amendments to bring these changes in the law into proper effect for
Roanoke County.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Failure to adopt this amendment risks having any traffic
charge issued as a County violation which involves incorporation by
reference of any Virginia code section amended by the General
Assembly being dismissed as not properly subject to the County
Code.
~ d..
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this
proposed amendment and reenactment.
Respectfully submitted,
~5~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ( ) Motion by
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Minnix
c:\wp51 \agenda\mde\sta[elaw.rp[
r ~ ~. .~.,
'«
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING
SECTION 12-8, ADOPTION OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF
CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In
General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and
readopted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of
Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the
state contained in Title 46.2 and in Article 2 (Section 18.2-226 et
seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except
those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can
have no application to or within the County, are hereby adopted and
incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable
within the County. References to "highways of the state" contained
in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed
to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the
County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to
time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully
as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for
any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse
to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in
no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any
provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed
_d`~ 4. 4 `. ...
for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted.
The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws
of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all
amendments to said laws made effective as of the date that this
ordinance is itself effective.
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1,
1992.
c:\wp51\age~a\mde\atatelaw.ond
r ! , * 1
i R ~~..~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE 62392-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.615 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF PETERS CREEK
ROAD AND DEER BRANCH ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.10-
5-12 AND 27.10-5-13) IN THE HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 AND R-1 TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH CONDITION3 UPON THE
APPLICATION OF VALLEY MOTORSPORT
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May
26, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held June
23, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on June 2, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 1.615 acre, as described herein, and located at
the corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer Branch Road, (Tax Map
Numbers 27.10-5-12 and 27.10-5-13) in the Hollins Magisterial
District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1
and R-1, Office District and Single Family Residential District, to
the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Valley
Motorsport.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
1. Within that portion of tract 27.10-5-13 that has
been described on a concept plan prepared by Motley
and Associates and submitted with the rezoning
application, only dusk-to-dawn lights for security
purposes will be installed.
2. All non-security light pole fixtures shall not
exceed 20 feet.
3. To provide for additional screening, a 6-foot fence
beginning at the northwest corner of tract 27.10-5-
13 and continuing south for 140 ft. as well as an
extra 10 ft. of a 4-foot fence, will be installed.
Additionally, low ground cover of 2-3 feet in
height along the outside of said fence will be
planted beginning at the buffer yard and continuing
until the entrance of Deer Branch Road. The
finished side of the fence will be oriented toward
the road.
4. No exterior speakers will be included in the
development of this property.
5. At the corner of Deer Branch Road and Peters Creek
Road, the display of vehicles will be done in such
a way as not to obstruct the view of drivers
entering onto Peters Creek Road from Deer Branch
Road.
6. The delivery of vehicles shall not occur between
the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless this process
takes place on tract 27.10-5-12.
7. A convenience store will not be constructed on
tract 27.10-5-13.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on Peters Creek Road, point being
the southeast corner of the St. Philip Evangelical
Lutheran Church and parcel A; thence with Peters Creek
Road, N. 69 deg. 37' 50" E. to a point on a curve; thence
with a curve to the right with a radius of 25', a tangent
of 25', and an arc of 39.27' to a point on Deer Branch
Road; thence with the road N. 22 deg. 49' 10" W. 193.39'
to the southwesterly corner of Lot 1, thence continuing
on the same line 21.61' ; thence with a curve to the right
with a radius of 154.07'; a tangent of 68.21', and an arc
of 128.51' to a point on Post Road; thence N. 27 deg. 45'
30" E. 39.09' to the northeasterly corner of Lot 1;
thence continuing for the same line 80.00' to the
northeasterly corner of Lot 2; thence S. 62 deg. 14' 30"
E. 176.15'; thence S. 27 deg. 35' 40" W. 80.00'; thence
continuing on the same line 45.31' to the northeasterly
corner of Parcel A; thence S. 22 deg. 49' 10" E. 219.61'
to the Place of Beginning; and being Lots 1 and 2 and
Parcel 2 of Tinker Knoll as shown on a plat by Mattern
and Mattern Engineers dated February 7, 1947, and
recorded in Plat Book 3, page 1.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
S
9 .<k=~'w~,~x
PETITIONER: VALLEY MOTORSPORT
CASE NUMBER: 10-6/92
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 1992
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1992
A. REQUEST
Petition of Valley Motorsport to rezone approximately 1.615 acres from B-1 and R-1 to B-
2 to operate a new car dealership, located at the corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer
Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
James Hill expressed concern that a convenience store may go in on the property.
Barbara Heldreth asked that no access be allowed onto Deer Branch Road. Dusty Mosness
agreed with Ms. Heldreth and said that a lot of people test drive the cars in their
neighborhood.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission asked how the fence will be oriented. Calvin Phelps with Motley and
Associates said that the posts supporting the fence will be on petitioner's side so the residents
will benefit from the best side of the fence. Mr. Massey said that he is familiar with the site
and the plan is an excellent example of managed growth--expanding a business while
minimizing the impacts on surrounding areas.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
1) Within that portion of tract 27.10-5-13 that has been described on a concept plan prepared
by Motley and Associates and submitted with the rezoning application, only dusk-to-dawn
lights for security purposes will be installed.
2) All non-security light pole fixtures shall not exceed 20 feet.
3) To provide for additional screening, a 6-foot fence beginning at the northwest corner of
tract 27.10-5-13 and continuing south for 140 ft. as well as an extra 10 ft. of a 4-foot fence,
will be installed. Additionally, low ground cover of 2-3 feet in height along the outside of
said fence will be planted beginning at the buffer yard and continuing until the entrance of
Deer Branch Road. The finished side of the fence will be oriented toward the road.
4) No exterior speakers will be included in the development of this property.
5) At the corner of Deer Branch Road and Peters Creek Road, the display of vehicles will be
done in such a way as not to obstruct the view of drivers entering onto Peters Creek Road
from Deer Branch Road.
6) The delivery of vehicles shall not occur between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless this
process takes place on tract 27.10-5-12.
7) A convenience store will not be constructed on tract 27.10-5-13.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Mr. Massey moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. Mr. Gordon
supported the motion but wanted to comment with regard to the rating system used in the
staff report; staff works extremely hard on these reports and I think the job was well done.
The motion carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Hooker, Witt, Massey
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
F. DISSENTING PERSPEC'T'IVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS:
X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report _ Other
n._.>
Terrance rringto Secretary
Roanok County Planning Commission
r
~,~'
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 10-6/92 PETITIONER: Valley Kotorsport
REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid DATE: June 2, 1992
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. This is a conditional request to rezone approximately 1.615
acres from B-1 and R-1 to B-2 to operate a new car
dealership, located at the corner of Peters Creek Road and
Deer Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
b. Two parcels are involved in the rezoning request. Both
parcels are owned by St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran
Church. The parcel that fronts on Peters Creek Road, zoned
B-1, has been the site of this church since 1962. The back
parcel (zoned R-1) has a small, brick single-family
residence on it, similar to the homes in the neighboring
community. This house has been used by the church as a
pre-school facility for approximately 20 years.
c. Petitioner has proffered the following: (1)On the back
parcel only dusk-to-dawn lights for security purposes will
be installed. (2)All non-security light pole fixtures shall
not exceed 20 feet. (3)To install a 6-foot fence beginning
at the northwest corner of the back parcel and continuing
for 140 feet, as well as an additional 10 feet of a 4-foot
fence, will be installed. Additionally, low ground cover
of 2-3 feet in height along the outside of said fence will
be planted beginning at the buffer yard and continuing
until the entrance on Deer Branch Road. (4)No exterior
speakers will be included in the development of this
property. (5)At the corner of Deer Branch Road and Peters
Creek Road, the display of vehicles will be done in such
a way as not to obstruct the view of drivers entering onto
Peters Creek Road from Deer Branch Road. (6)The delivery
of vehicles shall not occur between the hours of 7 pm and
7 am unless this process takes place on tract 27.10-5-12
(the tract that fronts on Peters Creek Rd.).
d. Valley Motorsport has been located on the parcel directly
to the east of the church site since 1984. They have
expanded twice in the ensuing eight years. The request
before you tonight would facilitate another major
expansion.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. The B-2 zoning district allows a wide range of commercial
uses including new car dealerships and associated used car
lots and service facilities.
b. Petitioner will be required to submit site plans for review
and approval.
c. Commercial entrance permits will be required from Virginia
Department of Transportation.
1
y~'
"~~~
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Relatively flat with a slight upward slope to
the north.
b. Ground Cover: In addition to the church, the single-family
house and the associated parking areas both sites have some
natural groundcover consisting of typical landscaping such
as grass, shrubs and small trees.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek
Community Planning Area. The initiative for this area is
to stimulate growth.
b. General area: As stated above, Valley Motorsport is
located directly to the east. All of the parcels in the
general area, that front on Peters Creek Road, are zoned
commercial and range in use from farm equipment sales, to
doctor's offices and a funeral home. The back parcel,
where the pre-school is operating, was platted in 1947 as
Lots #1 and #`2 of the Tinker Knoll subdivision. This
subdivision is a well established single-family
neighborhood. It encompasses approximately 46 homes on
Post Road, Deer Branch Road, Knoll Road and Memory Lane.
Some of the homes along Memory Lane back up to the
industrial sites along Plantation Road. Along Post Road,
the four lots north of the day care center property back
up to the current Valley Motorsport car storage lots. To
the north west of this subdivision is Waldrond Park. The
homes along the northern portion of Deer Branch Road back
up to the park. In general, this subdivision is a
residential enclave, bordered on two sides by the
commercially and industrially developed areas of Peters
Creek and Plantation Roads and on one side by the open
space and recreational facilities of Walrond Park.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the
proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable
impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and
N/A = not applicable.
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan
has placed this area within a Core designation.
2
.. ~' ,
This designation, as drawn on the 1985 Future Land Use Plan
includes the single-family homes on the eastern side of
Post Road. The Core designation extends, in a triangular
shape from Peters Creek Road, along the eastern side of
Post Road, up to Plantation Road. All other homes in
Tinker Knoll, including those on the western side of Post
Road, are designated Neighborhood Conservation on the Land
Use Map. The petitioners proposed use is consistent with
the general retail aspects of the Core designation.
Petitioner proposes, and is consistent with Policy C-5, to
provide screening and buffering from the single-family
residential neighborhood that borders on the north side.
The proposal is not consistent with Policy C-4 which states
that commercial sites should be designed in such a way as
to facilitate site to site movements between adjoining
commercial sites and should minimize the number of
vehicular access points to public streets.
4
4
b. Surrounding Land: See the discussion above in "General
Area."
c. Neighboring Area: The petitioner is requesting to rezone
two parcels of land. Parcel #1 fronts on Peters Creek Road
and is bordered on the eastern side by Valley Motorsport,
a large car dealership. On the western side this site is
bordered by Deer Branch Road with a funeral home across the
street. Parcel #`2 is the site of a single-family home
which is used as a pre-school facility by the church. This
parcel is part of the Tinker Rnoll subdivision and is
bordered to the north by similar homes which are used as
residences, to the east by the Valley Motorsport car
storage yard, and to the west by Post Road with other
single-family homes across Post Road and a funeral home.
The funeral home has access from Deer Branch Road and does
generate an increased amount of traffic.
Although the back parcel, Parcel #`2, has been used for a
"commercial" use for many years, i.e., the church pre-
school, the nature of this use is less intensive than that
which is proposed in terms of aesthetics, truck traffic,
and hours of operation. There are approximately 40
children attending the pre-school. The hours of the school
are 9 am to 12 pm, Monday through Friday. The pre-school
use does generate relatively high peak hour traffic counts,
approximately 80 vehicle trip ends in the morning and 80
in the afternoon. The proposed use would bring cars being
test driven into the neighborhood in addition to heavy
trucks delivering new cars. The current use of this parcel
is more conducive to the single-family characteristics of
the Tinker Knoll subdivision. In staffs opinion the
proposed use of Parcel #`2 would have a more detrimental
impact on the neighborhood of which this site is a part.
3
.., ~,~-,
3 d. Site Layout: Petitioner proposes to retain the church
structure, modify the roof and install siding over the
brick building so as to have a similar appearance as the
existing Valley Motorsport building. This refurbished
building will then be used as a car showroom. The existing
gravel lot will be paved. On Parcel #2 the house will be
removed. The majority of the site will be paved, with the
exception of a buffer yard and landscaping strip, and used
as a vehicle storage yard. A two-way access from Deer
Branch Road is planned, at the same location ae the
existing church entrance, as well as the existing access
from Peters Creek Road. Although controversial,~the access
from Deer Branch is proposed in order to accommodate
traffic traveling east on Peters Creek Road (the median cut
is at the intersection) and in order to facilitate the flow
of truck traffic on-site.
3 e. Architecture: see comments under "Site Layout" above
3 f. Screening and Landscape: As per the ordinance
4 g. Amenities: Parking will be provided for 60 vehicles on the
church lot. The back parcel will be paved and used for
vehicle storage.
h. Natural Features: None
TRAFFIC
4 i. Street Capacities: This portion of Peters Creek Road
averages 25,500 vehicles per day. Deer Branch Road,
between Peters Creek and Post Road, averages approximately
600-700 vehicles per day. It is anticipated, based on 1987
estimates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers,
that the proposed expanded facility would generate an
additional 200 vehicles per day, during the week, and 80
vehicles per day on the week-ends. This may be a low
estimation because it does not take into consideration the
traffic generated by people test driving vehicles. In
addition, some of the additional traffic will be large car
hauling trucks delivering vehicles.
3 j. Circulation: Adequate
UTILITIES
2 k. Water and Sewer: Public water and sewer are available to
this site. The petitioner will be responsible for
installing a monitoring manhole.
DRAINAGE
2 1. Basin: Peters Creek drainage basin
2 m. Floodplain: No
4
K?
x~. .t
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 n. Fire and Rescue Service: Adequate service
N/A o. Parks and Recreation: No impacts
N/A p. School: No impacts
TAX BASE
2 q. -Total Employees: approximately 10 new employees
-Additional real estate tax: $7,000
ENVIRONMENT
N/A r. Air: No impact
N/A s. Water: No impact
N/A t. Soils: No impact
3 u. Noise: Facilities such as car dealerships typically utilize
loud speaker systems. Until recently, Valley Motorsport
used such a system on their current site. As a result of
complaints received at a community meeting in April 1992
the petitioner has disconnected portions of this system and
lowered the volume on other portions. Petitioner has
proffered that no exterior speakers will be included in the
development of this property.
3 v. Signage: As per ordinance
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Core. The proposed use is
consistent with the general retail provisions of this
designation. Policy C-4 states that site to site movement
should be coordinated when designing commercial sites and
that vehicular access points to public streets should be
kept to a minimum and if feasible, shared among sites.
Ideally, this site would share an access with the existing
Valley Motorsport site. Due to topography this may not be
feasible.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1)Proposal is consistent with the intentions
of the Core land use designation.(2)Proposed use is
appropriate for the one parcel that fronts on Peters Creek
Road. (3)Petitioner has proffered only dusk-to-dawn lights
on the back parcel, no exterior speakers on the site, no
obstruction of view of drivers entering onto Peters Creek
Road from Deer Branch Road, and no delivery of vehicles
between 7 pm and 7 am on the back parcel.
5
emu{.
b. Weaknesses: (i)The proposal is not appropriate for the
back parcel that is part of a long established single-
family neighborhood. (2)The proposed use would be
significantly more intensive on the back parcel than that
which exists there now. The aesthetics of a vehicle
storage area are not consistent with those that either
exist now on this site or that exist in the adjoining
neighborhood. The hours of operation of a car dealership
are more intensive than those of a pre-school. The pre-
school does not operate on the week-ends nor during evening
hours when the most residents are at home. The intensity
of the traffic generated by the proposed use constitutes
an additional weakness. Although the proposed use would
only generate marginally more automobile traffic than the
existing use (approximately 200 vehicles per day versus
160) the heavy truck traffic generated by the delivery of
new cars would be more intense than that which currently
exists on this site and more than is appropriate for this
residential neighborhood.
c. Proffers Suggested: (1)Install a six foot solid wooden
fence along the entire north property line of the back
parcel, tract 27.10-5-13. Plant low ground cover of 2-3
feet in height along the outside of this fence, beginning
at the buffer yard and continuing until the entrance on
Deer Branch Road. (2)No outdoor lights shall be installed
on the north property line (tract 27.10-5-13) that adjoins
the single-family property. Only dusk-to-dawn lights, for
security purposes, will be installed on tract 27.10-5-13.
No outdoor light on either parcel shall exceed one-half
candle foot at the property boundaries. (3)No vehicles
shall be parked within the buffer yards. At the corner of
Deer Branch Road and Peters Creek Road, the display of
vehicles will be done in such a way as not to obstruct the
view of drivers entering onto Peters Creek Road from Deer
Branch Road. (4)Exterior loud speakers shall not be used
on either of these two parcels. (5)The delivery of vehicles
shall not occur between the hours of 7 pm and 7 am on tract
27.10-5-13 (the back parcel).
6
~~
~~
1yTH~
fit'
St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church ~ ~~
6806 Peters Creek Road, NK' Roanoke, TEA 24019 '~gMeR~~'
703-366-7046 7'he Rev. Paul G. Gunsten, Pastor
May 28, 1992
Terrance Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning
Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning
P.V. Box 29880
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Mr. Harrington
Based on citizen comments made at the April 20 corr~m.~nity meeting held at our church and
because of our desire to ensure that the residents of Tinker Kno11 Subdivision continue
to have a safe environment in which to reside, we would Iike to offer the following
proffers as you consider the rezoning request made by Valley l~btor Sport for tracts
27.10-5-12, 13.
1. Wi thin that portion of tract 27.1 D-5-13 that leas been described on a
concept p1 an prepared by Ivb t1 ey and Associates and submitted wi th the
rezoning application only dusk-to-dawn lights for security purposes will
be installed.
2. A11 non-security light pole fixtures shall not e_ceed 2C feet.
south ~ ~ ~~
3. To provide for additional screening, a b-foot fe.7c beginning at the
northwest corner of tract 27.10-ti-13 ~~d continuirg`fvr 140 feet, as weal
as an additional 10 feet of a 4 foot fence, w.li be installed.
Additionally, Iow ground cover of 2-3 feet in Height along the outside of
said fence will ba planted beginning at the buffer ;~a~d and continu~.:g
until the entrance of Deer Branch Road. The finished side of the fence
will be oriented towards the road. ~~ l~
4. 11k~ exterior speakers will be included in the develc~~rr~r_: of*l:is propar~y.
5. At t11e corner of Peer Branch Road and Peters C. ee; Rea:l, the display of
vehicles will be done in such a way as not to obstruct the view of drivers
entering onto Peters Creek Road from Deer Branch oad.
6. The delivery of vehicles shall nct occur between t.`re 1,^urs of ,' PM and 7
AM unless this process takes place on tract 27.11-5-~~.
7. A convenience store will not be constructed on tract 27.10-5-13.~t ~~/
Sincerely,
The Trustees of St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church
Coleman Goode Arendall Wallace Edwin Mitchell Robert Inrving Nagele
~~
Date Rec.: 4 )23) 92 ,
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name: St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church
Phone : 366-7046
Address: 6806 Peters Creek Road, NW, Roanoke, VA 24019
2 . Applicant's Name : George Logan of Valley Motorsport
Address: 6900 Peters Creek Road, NW, Roanoke, VA 24019
Phone : 366-4830
3. Location of Property: Corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer Branch Road
Tax Map Number (s) : 2 7.10-5-12 and 2 7.10-5-13
4. Magisterial District: Hollins
5. Size of Property: 1.615+ acres
6. Existing Zoning: One parcel 27.10-5-12 (B-1) One parcel 27.10-5-13 (R-1)
Existing Land Use: Church and Day Care Center
7. Proposed Zoriing• B-2 General Commercial
Proposed Land Use: New car dealership
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Core
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes Forthcoming No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: S41o,o00
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
x Letter of Application x Concept Plan
x Metes and Bounds Description x List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) x Vicinity Map
x Application Fee Written Proffers
x Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agent:
Signature ~ ~ ~ Date ~1 ~" l l"I
Received By: ~
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
P~ AcARp3 tsStuEO TO ~ ~
q ~~a tg 2
=- -_ = Valle Motors ort
-__ - = Y p
- _ - - 6900 Peters Creek Road/P.O. Box 19309/Roanoke, Virginia 24019/PH. (703) 366~830/FAX (703) 366-6660
April 24, 1992
Terrance Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning
County of Roanoke
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Mr. Harrington:
Valley Motorsport has been located at 6900 Peters Creek Road
since 1984. Too, we had two major expansions, one in 1986 and
one in 1990. This application will serve to introduce you to
another expansion.
As you know, we are located between Dixie Farm Equipment and
St. Philip Lutheran Church. While this is a great location,
growth is limited unless one of our neighbors decides to relo-
cate. Therein lies our opportunity and the purpose of this
rezoning application.
It is my understanding that St. Philip's Building Committee
has recommended that the Church relocate to a site in north
Roanoke County. While the congregation has not yet voted on
this matter, the Building Committee's recommendation comes
with a unanimous endorsement. If the congregation agrees with
this recommendation, I intend to exercise my option and pur-
chase tracts 27.10-5-12 and 27.10-5-13 from the Church.
This purchase will allow us to move vehicles easier, clear the
front lane at our existing lot, allow for easier customer
access and make our three lines of vehicles more distinguish-
able. So as you can tell, this is an important step in the
development of my dealership.
In regards to [he development of the site, we understand that
we will need B-2 General Commercial Zoning. Additionally, the
Land Use Plan designates this area as Core.
Site specific changes and improvements can be seen on the
accompanying Concept P18n. But generally [hey include moving
the existing house and refurbishing the Church. The refur-
bished Church gill serve as a showroom for both Volkswagen
and Subaru.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to
contact me at your convenience.
Sipcerely,
(1~ ~ ~ • ^-
George X41. Loga P esident
_ Enclosure
`~/
„- sue~u.
• ~~
St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church ~
6806 Peters Creek Road, 1VN' Roanoke, YA 24019 '~,~E~1'
703-366-7046 The Rev. Paul G. Gunsten, Pastor
April 20, 1992
Mr. Terrance Harrington
Director of Planning 6 Zoning
Roanoke County
3738 Brambleton Av. SW
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mr. Harrington
I am writing in support of the Rezoning Application submitted by
George Logan of Valley Motor Sport. The property, located at the
corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer Branch Drive, i s presen tl y
owned by St. Philip Evangelical Lutheran Church, a congregation of
the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
We have completed a process of study to determine needs and the
1 ong range plans of our congrega ti on and community. Given the
present and potential growth in membership and expansion of
ministries, we have determined that an expanded facility is needed
requiring a larger site. Our Building Committee and Congregation
Council have unanimously agreed to recommend the sell of ovr
property to Valley Motor Sport, and we anticipate approval by the
congregation at a Special Meeting called for May 3, 1992.
As a congregation, we wish to be sensitive to our neighbors who
have been supportive of our ministry in this place. It is our
desire that our anticipated move would not cause disruption within
the community, especially for our residential neighbors. Our
congregation has enjoyed a most positive relationship with George
Logan and the staff of Valley Motor Sport through the years, and we
would anticipate that they would continue to be good neighbors for
those who adjoin this property. Therefore we wish to voice our
support for the Rezoning Application submitted by George Logan of
Valley Motor Sport.
Sincerely,
Pastor Paul G. "Chip" Gunsten
/ ~ •---- ~
\ \ ` ~ ~1 +~~•4
\ 3 / p /
1 • 1- / • ~
! {1At ~ i ~
\ /
~0 ++ 1l0• ~ ~pAt / lit!
• n • n. • ~ /
m
Ru '~ ~ `~a ~ ~'•
21 1.06Ae ~ . \ / 4
~ O
Rc'u. ~ ~ •
~ ~ ° ~ e~~
RGIS ~ b P•
~' 17 ~' 23 ~ s ~ 1 ~ sao
~ 4 Rc.~s . "` ,.oo~ ,~ ,.94At
~ f .y
IS / .` 9 ~ ~~ 'Y
~ >. ~ / sJn I r~
~• / ~ ~ / N ~h q ) /eC
l •
~ ~ ''o /
3 13 4 / 9 r ei~ ~'~ ~ J.
i M y d b N
• d ~`~ x at o4 / ~ - qtr ~-
~ • • 1!~ / 7 { • it / ~o ~ .
ii
1 8 n ~
s
~~ ~. ; a
~ ? O
/ ~ K ~r
~ sao.
~ \ ~ 3 " "i ~ ,ti's / ' `,~ le ~••,•,~ u,N,
2 ~ •s r IS j ~~ ', d ~~'
/ X10 ~ •'r~ i~~0'! p / 10 '~ 1~~ ^ - .~
~ ,r ~6 0 n
r 1 •
/ ~ ~a ~A~ ei ~~~ 16 - ~
3fJ h ~ •o
~~ t+ ~ ~ I
t9 ~ l Qd ~- q g \ - S
`• ••
1WI ` ~•O• / n!4 • / assn A''
` ~ S.1 6 $,
MO ~~ ~
:~riw~~ ~'f.~ e e ~ ,
` il~i a~ / ~
N ~ ~,~
~ \\
~\ `~ ..
` .. ~~
~'~
,..vek
t14
` <
•,
n ~/
C
3
4.04 ~t
:-
~.
,~,e
O~
,• ,
i
~ zzk
2
stems
>>00
/' /
~`1
~~
~~•
O~ ~
Q ~,
4y I°.
Q
~; ~~`
~~
~~~~`~
N
~.
rd
J
o~
0
cs
ZQ
dcfl
d
~~
N o
Motle & Associates
«, .~,~
36.
'T
gN~YgRo ~
A~q ~~
~Ti Ty
................... /~., S.
o
:.;:~:~'~'~:: 7
/ F r
/or
~3 .
.~._ ~L
r,
,\
\~,.
,.
t
;;. ~
~ ~
:~, ~'~
~.
~'
sO
-' -
~ ~opo
S G~~~K
PN
~~SSeo~Na ``~~ ~ ONCE PT PL o0
Noire
NOTE
LL PA
~
r " "
/ ''`
A
RCELS ON THIS MAP ,. ~
ARE ZONED p~
UNLESS
M
- , ,
~
/
,
OTHERWI~~
tNDICATED+ ~ ~ ~
~~1 j • m !
_
• ~
/
~ • ~ N
~ /
/ ! 'S
O
~ , ~
~ / ~\ # /
r
\ » r
_
w
/
» /
• .
n
~
~~
~ .
~
/
w '•°
~
: ~
,.
! n
~ s
~
` ascx
,,--~
~ /
~ ~
• ~ ~ ,.
O ` M N gZC gZG
~
~ ~ / ~
82
\
Lour ~' / A ~ M ~ ~ ~ u
~ •
~~ ~ ~ 'f cur
ar~r~
~ • ~
`\
~ ~
, asc ~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
a g2
! ` a
a wow a..
~ , .._ `
~
~ .
~ ~
63
O ` `,
~ ~
3
~i.ai ~ 4~,
MIM/~~ L/u.~ ' C
'p ,
~
~ ~ / ~
~
~
y
.'lM~
1
~
2
~
B ~ 82 A BZ
Z ` ~
~
~ K ~ '
~~ G~
BZ ~ B 2 a BZG~ ~ 4
~ ~~ ~
t
~ / ~ BZXC
li
0k
~ i i
'
/
\
~i ~
i
»
` '
~ BZ ~~ ~~~~ Rtx
~ „
t.
t C p ~
~~ p~
~~~ ` B3
i
B~ ~~
~
a -»,~ ~
B2
~ 62 ~~ :
y - '~
` '
• .
\ 4~er p ~ ~
sac
R1 ~~ `
~~
w.~~ ~r..M.~
w
82 s
F S9 ia~s ~
o.mr • fib
3 ~
O i
_ ~ i
COMMUNITYSBRVJCE,S VALLEY f•10TORSPORT
ANDDBVBLOPMBNT B 1 and R1 to a2
~.~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF A 1.615 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED
AT THE CORNER OF PETERS CREEK ROAD AND DEER
BRANCH ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.10-5-12 AND
27.10-5-13) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1
AND R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2
WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF VALLEY
MOTORSPORT
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May
26, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held June
23, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on June 2, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 1.615 acre, as described herein, and located at
the corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer Branch Road, (Tax Map
Numbers 27.10-5-12 and 27.10-5-13) in the Hollins Magisterial
District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1
and R-1, Office District and Single Family Residential District, to
the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Valley
Motorsport.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
~_, ..
1. Within that portion of tract 27.10-5-13 that has
been described on a concept plan prepared by Motley
and Associates and submitted with the rezoning
application, only dusk-to-dawn lights for security
purposes will be installed.
2. All non-security light pole fixtures shall not
exceed 20 feet.
3. To provide for additional screening, a 6-foot fence
beginning at the northwest corner of tract 27.10-5-
13 and continuing south for 140 ft. as well as an
extra 10 ft. of a 4-foot fence, will be installed.
Additionally, low ground cover of 2-3 feet in
height along the outside of said fence will be
planted beginning at the buffer yard and continuing
until the entrance of Deer Branch Road. The
finished side of the fence will be oriented toward
the road.
4. No exterior speakers will be included in the
development of this property.
5. At the corner of Deer Branch Road and Peters Creek
Road, the display of vehicles will be done in such
a way as not to obstruct the view of drivers
entering onto Peters Creek Road from Deer Branch
Road.
6. The delivery of vehicles shall not occur between
the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless this process
takes place on tract 27.10-5-12.
7. A convenience store will not be constructed on
tract 27.10-5-13.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on Peters Creek Road, point being
the southeast corner of the St. Philip Evangelical
Lutheran Church and parcel A; thence with Peters Creek
Road, N. 69 deg. 37' 50" E. to a point on a curve; thence
with a curve to the right with a radius of 25', a tangent
of 25', and an arc of 39.27' to a point on Deer Branch
Road; thence with the road N. 22 deg. 49' 10" W. 193.39'
to the southwesterly corner of Lot 1, thence continuing
on the same line 21.61' ; thence with a curve to the right
with a radius of 154.07'; a tangent of 68.21', and an arc
of 128.51' to a point on Post Road; thence N. 27 deg. 45'
30" E. 39.09' to the northeasterly corner of Lot 1;
thence continuing for the same line 80.00' to the
northeasterly corner of Lot 2; thence S. 62 deg. 14' 30"
E. 176.15'; thence S. 27 deg. 35' 40" W. 80.00'; thence
continuing on the same line 45.31' to the northeasterly
~~
. ~„..::.
corner of Parcel A; thence S. 22 deg. 49' 10" E. 219.61'
to the Place of Beginning; and being Lots 1 and 2 and
Parcel 2 of Tinker Knoll as shown on a plat by Mattern
and Mattern Engineers dated February 7, 1947, and
recorded in Plat Book 3, page 1.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp51 \agenda\zoning\valley. mot
r ~1
V~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE 62392-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.893 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED AT 3202 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX
MAP NO. 37.14-1-9) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1
AND B-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2
WITH CONDITIONS OPON THE APPLICATION OF
WORKMAN OIL COMPANY
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May
26, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held June
23, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on June 2, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 0.893
3202 Peters Creek Road,
Magisterial District,
classification of B-1
Commercial District, to
Commercial District.
acre, as described herein, and located at
(Tax Map Number 37.14-1-9) in the Catawba
is hereby changed from the zoning
and B-2, Office District and General
the zoning classification of B-2, General
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Workman
oil Company.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
1. The property rezoned to B-2 will be used only as a
convenience grocery store.
2. The gasoline pumps which will be used in connection
with the convenience store will be on the easterly
side of the store.
3. Petitioner will not request access for ingress and
egress to Peters Creek Road for new tract A-1.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
STARTING at a point on the north side of Peters Creek
Road at its intersection with the east side of North Lake
Drive marked with a chiseled "X"; thence with Peters
Creek Road, N. 56 deg. 12 min. 35 sec. E. 154.01 feet to
the actual Place of Beginning; thence with the westerly
line of the 0.423 acre presently zoned B-2, N. 20 deg. 41
min. W. 105.07 feet to a point; thence continuing with
the northerly line of the B-2 zoning, S. 69 deg. 19 min.
W. 150.00 feet to a point in the easterly right-of-way of
North Lake Drive; thence leaving the B-2 zoning and with
the easterly right-of-way of North Lake Drive, N. 20 deg.
41 min. 00 sec. W. 55.02 feet to an old pin; thence
continuing with said right-of-way N. 80 deg. 45 min. 00
sec. W. 15.88 feet to a point; thence leaving the right-
of-way of North Lake Drive and with the property of New
Tract A-2, as shown on Resubdivision for Orange Markets,
Inc. by T. P. Parker & Son dated August 3, 1989, N. 67
deg. 34 min. 42 sec. E. 241.38 feet to an iron pin found;
thence continuing with said New Tract A-2, S. 11 deg. 08
min. 01 sec. E. 165.87 feet to an iron pin in the
northerly right-of-way of Peters Creek Road; thence
leaving New Tract A-2 and with the right-of-way of Peters
Creek Road on a curve to the right whose radius is
5686.58 feet, whose arc is 38.09 feet and whose chord is
S. 56 deg. 01 min. 04 sec. W. 38.09 feet to a concrete
highway monument; thence continuing with said right-of-
way S. 56 deg. 12 min. 35 sec. W. 13.27 feet to the Point
of Beginning and containing 0.471 acre and being the
remainder of New Tract A-1 as shown on Resubdivision for
Orange Markets, Inc. which is currently Zoned B-1.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~ l.~~CJ
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
~: .
PETITIONER: WORKMAN OIL COMPANY
CASE NUMBER: 11-6/92
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 1992
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1992
A. REQUEST
Petition of Workman Oil Company to rezone 0.893 acre from B-1 and B-2 to B-2 to operate
a convenience store with gas dispensers, located at 3202 Peters Creek Road, Catawba
Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
None.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
1) The property rezoned to B-2 will be used only as a convenience grocery store.
2) The gasoline pumps which will be used in connection with the convenience store will be
on the easterly side of the store.
3) Petitioner will not request additional access for ingress and egress to Peters Creek Road
for new tract A-1.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. The motion
carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Hooker, Witt, Massey
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS:
X Concept Plan X Vicinity Map
X Staff Report _ Other
U ~~,, .
Terrance rri~Ygto ,Secretary
Roanok ounty annin~ Commission
a,:.
~:~, ~,
STAFF REPORT
CASE NU1~ER: 11-6/92
PETITIONER: WORKMAN OIL COMPANY
REVIEWED BY: LYNN DONIHE
DATE: JUNE 2, 1992
Petition of Workman Oil Company to rezone 0.893 acre from B-1 and B-2 to
B-2 to operate a convenience store with gas dispensers, located at 3202
Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Conditional request to rezone existing convenience store site to B-
2 in order to expand the retail gasoline facilities. Petitioner
proposes one additional dispenser with two hoses and a canopy over
top. This addition would extend into the portion of the site
currently zoned B-1. No new entrances are planned.
b. The existing B-2 portion of this site was originally rezoned for the
convenience store in 1985.
c. Petitioner has proffered the following conditions for the site: (1)
The property rezoned to Business District B-2 will be used only as
a convenience grocery store. (2) The gasoline pumps which will be
used in connection with the convenience store will be on the easterly
side of the store. (3) Petitioner will not request additional access
for ingress and egress to Peters Creek Road for New Tract A-1.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. Site plan or concept plan review may be required in order to ensure
compliance with County ordinances.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TOPOGRAPHY: Site is fairly level with bank rising on eastern edge of lot.
GROUND COVER: Site is developed with building, pavement and landscaped
areas.
AREA CHARACTERISTICS
FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Peters Creek Community
Planning Area, currently receiving urban services. The growth initiative
for this area is to stimulate growth.
GENERAL AREA is developed with single-family residential and mixed
commercial and office uses.
LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action.
Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact,
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable.
l . ~ ~. ~~
RATING FACTOR roTs
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed
this area within a Transition designation. Retail convenience
businesses are moderately compatible with this designation. The
development policies in the Transition Land Use category do not
address minor expansion of existing convenience businesses.
2 SURROUNDING LAND: Site is bordered by church property on north and
east, North Lakes Drive on the west, and Peters Creek Road (Roanoke
City) on the south. With the existing convenience store and gas
pumps in place, the addition of one gas pump should not be a
significant impact to surrounding properties.
2 NEIGHBORING AREA: A large single-family residential subdivision
(North Lakes) is to the northwest, mixed commercial and office uses
as well as scattered residential along Peters Creek Road. See
"Surrounding Land."
SITE LAYOUT: Existing building with canopied gas island will remain.
Petitioner proposes expanding gas island with canopy to east of
existing structure. Six additional parking spaces are proposed at
the pump area, as well as six additional parking spaces to the rear
of the paved area. Site shares access in rear with St. Paul's
Episcopal Church.
2 ARCHITECTURE: Existing building with canopy over gas island. New
island will also have canopy, attached to existing structure.
2 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: No additional landscaping will be
required.
1 AMENITIES: Concept plan indicates additional parking spaces to be
provided. This and spaces around gas pump should ease congestion
on the site.
N/A NATURAL AMENITIES:
TRAFFIC
2 STREET CAPACITIES: 1990 ADT for Peters Creek Road between Cove Road
and Route 581 (in Roanoke City) was 21,275. The ITE Trip Generation
manual has very limited data for gas pumps, but estimates about 133
trip ends per pump per day. This should not significantly impact the
traffic on Peters Creek Road.
1 CIRCULATION: The current site is congested, and backs traffic up
at the Peters Creek Road entrance. An additional pump with the
proposed six spaces at the pump along with the additional parking
spaces proposed at the rear of the site should promote better
circulation through the site. Concept plan indicates adequate travel
aisle widths. No additional entrances are requested.
~~ ~~ ``
UTILITIES
2 WATER: Existing service -- no adverse impacts on system.
2 SEWER: Existing service -- no adverse impacts on system.
DRAINAGE
2 BASIN: Lick Run drainage basin.
N/A FIAODPLAIN: None.
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 FIRE AND RESCUE PROTECTION: Within established service standard.
N/A PARRS AND RECREATION: No impact.
N/A SCHOOLS: No impact.
ENVIRONMENT
2 AIR:
2 WATER:
2 SOILS:
2 NOISE:
2 SIGNAGE: Per sign ordinance.
PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Transition and convenience businesses are
moderately compatible in this land use category. The Plan does not address
minor expansion of existing convenience businesses.
STAFF EVALUATION
STRENGTHS: (1) Additional gas pump and parking spaces will ease
congestion on the site.
WEAKNESSES: None.
• Date Rec. ~ a ~-
• Received By: ~ / .,_ ~,
Case No.: '~4
Ord. No..
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
1. Owner's Name: Workman Oil Company Phone: 804-239-6933
Address: P.O. Box 4332, Lynchburg, VA 24503, ATTN: Mr. Mike Duncan
2. Applicant's Name: Workman Oil Company Phone: 804-239-6933
Address: P.O. Box 4332, Lynchburg, VA 24503, ATTN: Mr. Mike Duncan
3. Location of Property: 3202_Peters Creek Road
Tax Map Number(s): 37.14-01-09
4. Magisterial District: Hollins
5. Size of Property: 0.893 Ac./38,915 Sq. Ft.
6. Existing Zoning: Convenience Store w/gas dispensers
Existing Land Use: B-1 0.471 Acre, B-2 0.422 Acre
7. Proposed Zoning: B-2
Proposed Land Use: Convenience Store w/gas dispensers
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Urban Developments
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No x~
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning
Staff caa assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:- Land $155,600/Bldgs. $10,000
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
x Letter of Application x Concept Plan
~_ Metes and Bounds Description x List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map
x Application Fee x Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agent:
Signature ~ Date ~ Z
.-
.!
TPP&S
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
County of Roanoke
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
ATTN: Mr. John Hartley
Planning Department
Dear John:
T. P. Parker, P.E., L.S. (1919-1989)
John T. Parker, P.E., L.S.
Frank B. Caldwell, III, P.E., L.S.
15 April 1992
RE: Rezoning Request for Workman Oil Co.
• Peters Creek Road ~ North Lake Drive
Work Order No. 91-1604
Please find enclosed the Rezoning Application Package and a
check in the amount of Nine Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($977.00)
for the application and filing fee for the referenced rezoning
request.
As we have previously discussed, this application is for the
rezoning to B-2 of the remaining part of New Tract A-1 which is
currently zoned B-1. The major portion of New Tract A-1 was rezoned
to B-2 in two separate requests. The last request was approved by
the Board of Supervisors on October 8, 1985.
As you may recall, during the original rezoning for this
property, the Planning Commission and Board was reluctant to zone the
entire frontage of the property owned by Ralph Richardson along
Peters Creek Road as B-2. This decision was based on their
uncertainty as to the ultimate use of the entire frontage.
Subsequent to these rezonings, a portion of this frontage, which is
now contained in New Tract A-2, was sold to the ELCA Fund (St. Paul
Lutheran Church). As a result of this sale, there can be no further
commercial development along Peters Creek Road in the frontage of New
Tracts A-1 & A-2. Workman Oil Company is requesting that all of
their property (New Tract A-1) be zoned under the B-2 designation.
Their request is made in order that they may expand their gasoline
retail facilities and associated canopy. We feel that this request
can be granted and stay within the intent of the original zonings to
B-2. Due to the current configuration of the property, there can be
no additional land added to New Tract A-1 which would have any
significant change on the current use in this corner. Additionally,
the City of Roanoke and YDOT will not allow any additional entrances
- T. P. Parker & Son -
816 Boulevard • Post Office Box 39 • Salem, Virginia 24153 • Telephone 703-387-1153 • FAX 703-389-5767
4~-~
i
County of Roanoke
ATTN: Mr. John Hartley
15 April 1992
Page 2
onto Peters Creek Road. Therefore, the approval of this request
would allow Workman Oil Company the fullest and best use of their
property without changing the original intent of the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors when this project was originally
approved. If you have any questions regarding this petition, please
feel free to call myself or Mr. Mike Duncan of Workman Oil Company
(804-239-6933). Thank you for your help.
Very truly yours,
T. P. PARKER & SON
rank B. Caldwell, III, P.E., L.S.
FBC/msc
Enclosures
~ ~ 9 ~,~
• ~ ~ tir+
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OE' ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of
Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance,
the Petitioner, Workman Oil Company, hereby voluntarily proffers
to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the
following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced
parcel of land:
1. The property rezoned to Business District B-2 will be used
only as a convenience grocery store.
2. The gasoline pumps which will be used in connection with the
convenience store will be on the easterly side of the store.
3. Petitioner will not request additional access for ingress
and egress to Peters Creek Road for New Tract A-1.
Respectfully submitted,
Petitioner
~~, i~9~
~~i~
~ ~~~~~
~~~ ~~o
My Commission ExpirBS_17,199J
( ' P 7ER5
'.+~~ ~~~~CREEK (Zp
PROPERTY Of
~.c.A. t ow ~
(sr. PAULSI~ fP1900PAL Cturtp~)
TAX PARCQ 37.14-01-9.1
~~a•
`~58i
SITE
covE
V 1,C 1N ITY MAP
~-~
~`Qr~~
/ ~~
/ ~~~
~ ~~\
E~SZMIG PROPOSED ~ ~ ~ ` .
~~~ 6 SPACES ~~~
E?lTRANCE
~1 ~
~ ~~• ~.
-~
~ I ~`~
1
1 „~ °~~ e
~ •• N ~'Y ~s ~~T
N ~ ~ '~
oas~t+c ~ O ~ d~ Cf ~
EASE1EJf T ~ ~ ~= N ~ N `~ ` C /
1 Q• a~ ~ Q m r ~p ~/
~a ~ `~ ~ ~
o ~•
~.
~ :~s•&a ~
~ ~ o
~ - 1
~~
°~
REZONMC PLAT
FnR
RKMAN OIL C
SITUATE PETERS CREEK ROAD
AND NORTH LAKE DRIVE
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
T~-~c No ~ ~•-Q1-~ TPP&S
N.e_ -- D~wN ~ r. p. p,~R ~ soN
ENO~NEERa Oid Hoal~n~rQ
-- CHK'D -- suRVE~s >~ Oioo~ 80~ >~
h ~~ ~ PV-NNERa ~~ ~ ~~
.1
n
i
n
COMMUNITY SBRVICl~,S WORKt~1A'V OIL COt1PAi~Y
AND DBVIsLOPMSIVT B -1 & B- 2 T 0 6- 2
37.14-1-9
;~~ .,, ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
OF A 0.893 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED
AT 3202 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 37.14-
1-9) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 AND B-2 TO
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH
CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF WORKMAN OIL
COMPANY
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May
26, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held June
23, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on June 2, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real
estate containing 0.893
3202 Peters Creek Road,
Magisterial District,
classification of B-1
Commercial District, to
Commercial District.
acre, as described herein, and located at
(Tax Map Number 37.14-1-9) in the Catawba
is hereby changed from the zoning
and B-2, Office District and General
the zoning classification of B-2, General
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Workman
oil Company.
3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts:
1. The property rezoned to B-2 will be used only as a
i ~~-
convenience grocery store.
2. The gasoline pumps which will be used in connection
with the convenience store will be on the easterly
side of the store.
3. Petitioner will not request access for ingress and
egress to Peters Creek Road for new tract A-1.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
STARTING at a point on the north side of Peters Creek
Road at its intersection with the east side of North Lake
Drive marked with a chiseled "X"; thence with Peters
Creek Road, N. 56 deg. 12 min. 35 sec. E. 154.01 feet to
the actual Place of Beginning; thence with the westerly
line of the 0.423 acre presently zoned B-2, N. 20 deg. 41
min. W. 105.07 feet to a point; thence continuing with
the northerly line of the B-2 zoning, S. 69 deg. 19 min.
W. 150.00 feet to a point in the easterly right-of-way of
North Lake Drive; thence leaving the B-2 zoning and with
the easterly right-of-way of North Lake Drive, N. 20 deg.
41 min. 00 sec. W. 55.02 feet to an old pin; thence
continuing with said right-of-way N. 80 deg. 45 min. 00
sec. W. 15.88 feet to a point; thence leaving the right-
of-way of North Lake Drive and with the property of New
Tract A-2, as shown on Resubdivision for Orange Markets,
Inc. by T. P. Parker & Son dated August 3, 1989, N. 67
deg. 34 min. 42 sec. E. 241.38 feet to an iron pin found;
thence continuing with said New Tract A-2, S. 11 deg. 08
min. O1 sec. E. 165.87 feet to an iron pin in the
northerly right-of-way of Peters Creek Road; thence
leaving New Tract A-2 and with the right-of-way of Peters
Creek Road on a curve to the right whose radius is
5686.58 feet, whose arc is 38.09 feet and whose chord is
S. 56 deg. 01 min. 04 sec. W. 38.09 feet to a concrete
highway monument; thence continuing with said right-of-
way S. 56 deg. 12 min. 35 sec. W. 13.27 feet to the Point
of Beginning and containing 0.471 acre and being the
remainder of New Tract A-1 as shown on Resubdivision for
Orange Markets, Inc. which is currently Zoned B-1.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts
of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp5l\agenda\zoning\workman.oil
~'
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TIIESDAY, JIINE 23, 1992
RESOLIITION 62392-i1 APPROVING A SPECIFIC CAPITAL
EBPENDITIIRE FOR THE ACQIIISITION BY THE ROANORE REGIONAL
AIRPORT COMMISSION OF THE PIIRCHASE OF AN AIRCRAFT
RESCIIE AND FIRE FIGHTING VEHICLE, IIPON CERTAIN TERMS AND
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between Roanoke
County, the City of Roanoke and the Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission provides that the commission shall prepare and submit
for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000.00
to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and
WHEREAS, by report dated June 23, 1992, a copy of which
is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, the Roanoke
Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County
approve a certain capital expenditure by the Commission for the
purchase of an aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicle in the
total amount of $263,089.00.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia that this Board hereby approves the
capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of
$263,089.00 in connection with the purchase of an aircraft rescue
and fire fighting vehicle, and the County Administrator and Clerk
to the Board are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on
behalf of the County, any additional documentation, in form
approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said
approval, as more particularly set forth in the report to this
Board on this subject from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
dated June 23, 1992, a copy of which is on file in the Office of
u,
the Clerk to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~~i' l.~c-L4'lU
Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
the Clerk to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission
W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT. h ~ ~~ ~~i /J ~=~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII..L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR TIE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed 6y the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will 6e limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111
~~_~~
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ---''CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~~1~0~?i~!(.~~-. I )
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~,~-~~ :~~>~~ti's _ ~' %1~ ~~rf-~
ADDRESS ~ /f;:~' 7 ~ -~- ~y , ivy-r~„T~~}
PHONE ~. ~`3 y:~ ~ ~-~.~ y~:-P
niininnnnniin~ninnnninn~un~~ninininiiiuinnnininnil
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 23, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Capital Expense for Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: '~
BACKGROUND:
According to the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke
County and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission any capital
expenditure in excess of $100,000 must be approved by the Council
of the City of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors of the County.
SUMMARY'
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission would like to acquire one 1,500
gallon aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicle to replace a
similar vehicle which has reached the end of its useful life. The
cost of this vehicle is $263,089. The Federal Government will
reimburse the Commission for 90$ of the cost of the acquisition and
the State will reimburse the Commission for 5~ of the cost. The
remaining funds are available within the existing funds of the
Airport Commission.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT:
The agreement between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County and the
Airport Commission requires a contribution from the County of
Roanoke only if the Airport Commission ends the year in a deficit
situation. Since necessary monies are available in the retained
earnings of the Airport Commission, this purchase should not
produce a deficit in the operations; therefore, there would be no
additional monies required from the County of Roanoke.
RECOMMENDATION'
Staff recommends approving the attached resolution which authorizes
the Airport Commission to proceed with the purchase of a $263,089
fire fighting vehicle.
F- `I
Respectfully submitted, Approved
f~ by,
'
~~
(~
'r1Q
/ ~ °Y+' w~
111 1 /
:
.
Diane D. ,
Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance
------ County Administrator
-------------------------------
-------- -------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
F-`~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1992
RESOLIITION APPROVING A SPECIFIC CAPITAL
E%PENDITIIRE FOR THE ACQIIISITION BY THE ROANORE REGIONAL
AIRPORT COMMISSION OF FOR THE PIIRCHASE OF AN AIRCRAFT
RESCIIE AND FIRE FIGHTING VEHICLE, IIPON CERTAIN TERMS AND
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between Roanoke
County, the City of Roanoke and the Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit
for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000.00
to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and
WHEREAS, by report dated June 23, 1992, a copy of which is on
file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve
a certain capital expenditure by the Commission for the purchase of
an aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicle in the total amount of
$263,089.00.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia that this Board hereby approves the
capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of
$263,089.00 in connection with the purchase of an aircraft rescue
and fire fighting vehicle, and the County Administrator and Clerk
to the Board are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on
behalf of the County, any additional documentation, in form
approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said
approval, as more particularly set forth in the report to this
Board on this subject from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
dated June 23, 1992, a copy of which is on file in the Office of
the Clerk to the Board.
Airpdrt Commission
W. Robert Herbert, Chairman
Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman
Joel M, Schlanger
H. Odell Minnix
Kit B. Kiser
~c C : ~r..-..:- l ~-
~,~~ lotion Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
(703) 362-1999
FAX (703) 563-4838
e
Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director
June 16, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Members
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Dear Members of the Board:
SUBJECT: Roanoke Regional Airport
Purchase of 1500 Gallon Aircraft Rescue
and Fire Fighting Vehicle (ARFF)
As you are aware, Section 17(b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke,
Roanoke County, and the Airport Commission requires any capital expenditure over
$100,000 be approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke and the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County.
This letter is to respectfully request that the Roanoke County Board of Super-
visors adopt a resolution approving the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission of $263,089.00 necessary to acquire one 1500 gallon aircraft rescue
and fire fighting vehicle to replace a similar vehicle which has reached the end of its
useful life. The federal government is expected to reimburse the Commission for 90%
of the cost of the acquisition, the State will reimburse the Commission for 5% of said
cost, and the Commission has funds available for the remaining cost; therefore, the
County will not be responsible for any part of the purchase price.
The details of the purchase are more particularly set forth in the attached report,
which has been prepared for presentation to the Commission at its June 23, 1992
meeting.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
Jacqueline L. Shuck
Executive Director
JLS:csp
Attachment
cc: Commission Members
Legal Counsel
County Clerk
~°'" '~
r"'- °"M
i,
June ?3, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Viembers
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
Dear Members of the Commission:
Subject: Purchase of an Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicle
I. RECOMMENDATION:
A. Award the contract for the purchase of one 1500 Qallon ARFF vehicle to
Oshkosh Truck Corporation.. in the amount of 5263,809.00 effective upon approval
of the purchase by the City and County of Roanoke, reject all other bids effective
upon the full execution of a purchase contract and authorize the Executive
Director to sign the purchase contract and any other documents related to the
purchase.
B. Transfer 5263,809.00 of unobligated funds in Account #004-058-8551-9003 to a
new account to be established by the Treasurer.
II. BACKGROUND:
A. The Airport owns 'wo (~ 1500 }allon ARFF vehicles; one of the Airport's 1500
gallon ARFF vehicles has reached the end of its useful service life and is
becoming undepen:iable.
B. Bids for the 1500 Qallon ARFF vehicle were preQared and then advertised on
May 6, 1992; four ~ Yl bid ~ackaQes were mailed to interested equipment vendors.
C. Bids were opened On iViay 29, 1992, with three X31 vendors bidding on a new
vehicle and two 21 vendors bidding on a remanufactured vehicle which was a
permissible alternate to the specifications.
D. The bid tabulation is attached as Attachment I, hereto.
E. Since the Airport is required by Federai Regulations to meet certain ARFF
response requirements, ARFF vehicles c~ualifv for Federal AIP funds.
F. Federal AIP grant funds in the amount of 5212,637.00, is ate Qrant funds in the
amount of S11,818.46, and local funds in the amount of 539,353.54 are currently
available for the purchase in Account ;044-058-8551-9003.
G. In order to close out the major portion of the grant projects, the $263,809.00 of
federal, state and local funds necessary to purchase the truck should be trans-
ferred from Account m004-058-8551-9003 to a new account.
Pa~_e Two
r
III. 1SSLTES:
.-~. Because there was a concern that the cost of a new vehicle might greatly exceed
the bud,et for the truck, the ~ecificationS permitted etch hidder to hid nn a new
vehicle and/nr a fully remanufactured vehicle.
B. The specifications specified that the Commission had the discretion to determine
whether it would huv a new ~r remanufactured vehicle after reviewing all bids.
C. The lrnv hid fnr a new vehicle is from the Oshkosh Thick Corporation; the low
hid for a remanufactured vehicle (the Alternate Bid) is from Walters Tn~ck
Corporation.
D. Both vehicles meet the Commission's FAA approved specifications and fundi^g is
available for either vehicle.
E. The Oshkosh vehicle has newer "state-of-the-art" technology and would be a
1992/93 vehicle; since the airport's second ARFF vehicle, an Oshkosh, will be
remanufactured in the next t<vo to three years, the purchase of the new Oshkosh
vehicle should result .n lower maintenance costs due to the use of similar parts
and supplies.
F. The Walter vehicle w,~u1d utilize a 197 vehicle year chassis and require a dual
engine operation: or :for the vehicle and one to operate the water pump system;
the Oshkosh uses a 1~.; Qer single engine with a "power take off' for pump
operation. Future m:~;intenance costs are expected to be higher for the Walter
truck. However, bot vehicles have a full one year warranty from delivery date.
G. The FA.~ has concur:•eci that the new Oshkosh truck is the better value and may
be purchased; and th state and F.=~A have indicated that once the purchase is
complete, both Qrant~ can he amended to reimburse the Commission 527,720.20
of the initial 539,.;33. =~ local share.
H. notice of ~~~~ capital proiect has been gent to the proper officials of the Citv am
County or Roanoke for their a~pmval in accordance with Section 17(b) of the
contract between the City, County and Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
~G~~
~/ ~'
Jacqueline L. Shuck
Executive Director
cc: General Counsel
Commission Treasurer
cspOb 1692.d
arI I
,~.irccrt Commission
,1`!. I<l:~Ct i i"'lei l~Cii, ~...,Clr~i.~'~.n
?cb L..;ohnson, Vice Chcirmcn
.:cel M. Schlcnger
H. OCell Minnix
Kit 8. Kiser
~TT~1CF~SEIv~ I
5202 Aviation Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24C
~'`~ (703) 362-1999
FAX (703) 563-4838
.;cc~ueline L. Shuck. ~Yecutive Cirectcr
RC~J~JC4
F~EG~Jr
P1f~
Bidder
Emergency One, Inc.
Oshkosh Truc'.~ Corporation
Bid Tabulation
for
X00 Gallon ~RFF Vehicle
Bid Opening Date: May 29, 1992
Bid Opening Time: 2:00 p.m.
~1ew Vehicle
5272,46.00
5263,809.00
Crash Rescue Equipment Service, Inc. ~o bid
Walter Truc'.~ Corporation 5319,863.00
Remanufactured Vehicle
Cathy(S. Pendleton, CPS
Commission Secretary
No bid
No bid
523,394.00
5198,~9~.00
F.~
RESOLUTION OF 'T.'HE ROANOKE REGIONAL r.IRPORT COaMISSION
Adopted this 23rd Day of June, 1992
No, 92-016
A RESOLUTION accepting a bid for the purchase of ona 1500
gallon Aircraft :rescue and Fire =fighting ("ARF:"} vehicle and
authorizing the transfer of $263,809.00 of unobligated funds to a
new account, upon certain terms and conditions.
BE IT RESOLVED 'cy the Roanoke Regicnal airport G~mmissicr.
that the bid or Oshkosh Tuck Corporation in the amount cf
X253,809.00 for the purchase of one new 1500 gallon ArZ;F vehlc_e
is hereby ACCE?TED, and the Executive Director and the Secretary
are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, n form
approved by the General Counsel, such ~~ritten documentation as is
necessary to conclude the pure..".ase cf said vehicle; and
$E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other bids received by ~.:^.e
Co;nmission for the sale of said ARFF vehicle are hereby RLJECmEJ,
and the Ccmmission'a 3acretary is directed to notify eac:Z other
bidder and to express the Commissicn's appreciation for
submission of such bias; and
BE IT FURTHER ?ESOLVED that the sum of X253,$09.00 of
unobligated funds, ~,arrently maintained in account nunber 004-
058-8551-9003 be transferred to a new account, to be establi3ed
by the Treasurer, for the payment of the purchase price of said
vehicle; all as mor° particularly set forth in the Report of ~:'?e
E:~ecutive Director to the Comriission dated June 23, 1392.
ATTEST:
Secreta_y
w#11CC77
Airport Commission ~--~..~- ~~ ~,~~ cation Drive
W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman (703) 362-1999
Joel M. Schlanger FAX (703) 563-4838
H. Odell Minnix s;
Kit B. Kiser
Jacqueline L. Shuck, Ixecutive Director
June 16, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Members
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Dear Members of the Board:
SUBJECT: Roanoke Regional Airport
Purchase of 1500 Gallon Aircraft Rescue
and Fire Fighting Vehicle (ARFF)
As you are aware, Section 17(b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke,
Roanoke County, and the Airport Commission requires any capital expenditure over
$100,000 be approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke and the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County.
This letter is to respectfully request that the Roanoke County Board of Super-
visors adopt a resolution approving the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission of $263,089.00 necessary to acquire one 1500 gallon aircraft rescue
and fire fighting vehicle to replace a similar vehicle which has reached the end of its
useful life. The federal government is expected to reimburse the Commission for 90%
of the cost of the acquisition, the State will reimburse the Commission for 5% of said
cost, and the Commission has funds available for the remaining cost; therefore, the
County will not be responsible for any part of the purchase price.
The details of the purchase are more particularly set forth in the attached report,
which has been prepared for presentation to the Commission at its June 23, 1992
meeting.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
Jacqueline L. Shuck
Executive Director
JLS:csp
Attachment
cc: Commission Members
Legal Counsel
County Clerk
.+
June ?3, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Llembers
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
Dear Members of the Commission:
Subject: Purchase of an Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicle
I. RECOMMENDATION:
A. Award the contract for the purchase of one 1500 gallon .ARFF vehicle to
Oshkosh Truck Corporation in the amount of 8263.809.00 effective upon approval
of the purchase by the City and County of Roanoke, reject all other bids effective
upon the full execution of a purchase contract and authorize the Executive
Director to sign the purchase contract and any other documents related to the
purchase.
B. Transfer $263,809.00 of unobligated funds in Account #004-058-85~ 1-9003 to a
new account to be established by the Treasurer.
II. B~,CKGROUi`1D:
A. The Airport owns 'wo (~ 100 gallon ARFF vehicles; one of the Airport's 100
gallon ARFF vehicles has reached the end of its useful service life and is
becoming undepen~.lable.
B. Bids for the 1500 gallon ARFF vehicle were prepared and then advertised. on
i/Iay 6, 1992; four ~ =11 bid packages were mailed to interested equipment vendors.
C. Bids were opened On ivtay 29, 1992, with three (3} vendors bidding on a new
vehicle and two (21 vendors bidding on a remanufactured vehicle which was a
permissible alternate to the specifications.
D. The bid tabulation is attached as Attachment I, hereto.
E. Since the Airport is required by Federal Regulations to meet certain ARFF
response requirements, ARFF vehicles c~ualifv for Federal AIP funds.
F. Federal AIP grant funds in the amount of 5212 637.00, state grant funds in the
amount of 511,818.46, and local funds in the amount of 539,353.54 are currently
available for the purchase in Account X004-058-8661-9003.
G. In order to close out the major portion of the grant projects, the 5263,809.00 of
federal, state and local funds necessary to purchase the truck should be trans-
ferred from Account m004-0~8-85~ 1-9003 to a new account.
Pa~,e Two
III. iSSUi?S:
.~. Because there was a concern that the cost of a new vehicle might greatly exceed
the budget for the truck, the ~ecifications permitted etch bidder to hid nn a new
vehicle ZndLnr a tulle remanufactured vehicle.
B. The specifications specified that the Commission had the discretion to determine
whether it would hue a new or remanufactured vehicle after reviewing all bids.
C. The logy hid for a new vehicle is from the Oshkosh Tnick Corporation; the low
hid for a remanufactured vehicle (the Alternate Bid) is from Walters Tn~cl~
Corporation.
D. Both vehicles meet the Commission's FAA approved specifications and fundi-~g is
available for either vehicle.
E. The Oshkosh vehicle has newer, "state-of-the-art" technology and would be a
199?/93 vehicle; since the airport's second ARFF vehicle, an Oshkosh, will be
remanufactured in the next two to three years, the purchase of the new Oshkosh
vehicle should result :n lower maintenance costs due to the use of similar parts
and supplies.
F. The Walter vehicle w,~uld utilize a 197 vehicle year chassis and require a dual
engine operation: or :tor the vehicle and one to operate the water pump system;
the Oshkosh uses a l~.r~er single engine with a "power take off' for pump
operation. Future maintenance costs are e:cpected to be higher for the Walter
truck. However, bot`: vehicles have a full one year warranty from delivery date.
G. The F_-~.~ has concur: ed that the new Oshkosh truck is the better value and may
be purchased; and th-, state and F.=~A have indicated that once the purchase is
complete, both Qrant~ can he amended to reimburse the Commission X27,720.20
of the initial :~39,5~3._~~4 local share.
H. Notice of this capital proiect has been gent to the proper officials of the City and
County of Roanoke for their aneroval in accordance with Section 17(b) of the
contract between the City, County and Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
~% `-
Jacqueline L. Shuck
Executive Director
cc: General Counsel
Commission Treasurer
cso0ti 1b92.d
arff
Air~crt Ccmmissicn
vV. i<C~e(i t~ierVCfi, ~~~ =irr^Cn
Bch L Johnson, Vice Cheirman
Jcel M. Schlan~er
H. Odell Minnix
Kit 8. Kiser
ATTACFR~NT I
5202 Aviation Drive
Roanoke, Virginia 24C (703) 362-1999
FAX (703)563-4838
Jcc~ueline L. Shuci<. ~Yecutive Cirectcr
Bidder
Emergency One, Inc.
Oshkosh True Corporation
Bid Tabulation
for
100 Gallon ~RFF Vehicle
Bid Opening Date: May 29, 1992
Bid Opening Time: 2:00 p.m.
Crash Rescue Equipmenr Service, Inc.
Walter True Corporation
~1ew Vehicle Remanufactured Vehicle
5272,46.00 No bid
5263,809.00 No bid
`lo bid 523,394.00
5319,863.00 ~198,~9~.00
~ ~~ ~ ~~'`
Cathy (S. Pendleton, CPS
Commission Secretary
RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
Adopted this 23rd Day of rune, 1992
No. 92-016
A RESOLUTION accepting a bid for the purchase of one 1500
gallon Aircraft Rescue and Fire sighting ("ARF~"} vesicle and
authorizing the transfer of $263,809.00 of unobligated funds to a
new account, upon certain terms and conditions.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regicnal airport Commission
that the bid of Oshkosh Tuck Corporation in the amount cf
X263,809.00 for the purchase of one new 1500 gallon AR~'F vehicle
is hereby ACCE?TE'D, and the Executive Director and the Secretary
are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, in form
approved by the General Counsel, such written documentation as is
necessary to conclude the purchase cf said vehicle; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other bids received b_r the
Commission for the :=ale of said ARFF vehicle are hereby REJECTED,
and the Commission's secretary is directed to notify eac:n other
bidder and to express the Commissicn's appreciation nor
submission of such rids; and
BE IT FURTHER ?E30LVED that tine sum of X253,809.00 of
unobligated funds, _~,.:.rrently maintained in account nu~ber 00~°
058-8551-9003 be trar.s~erred to a new account, to be established
by the Treasurer, for the payment of the ourchase price or said
vehicle; ali as more particularly set forth in the Report of the
Executive Director to the Commission dated June 23, 1992.
ATTEST:
Secretary
:~#11CQ77
O~ ROANp~,~
h p
z
o
a
1 38
C~.a~t~#g ~~ ~.~~xx~~~~
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
June 24, 1992
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DlSTR1CT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DSSTRICT
H. ODELL FUZZY MIN NIX
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERW.DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERALL. DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck
Executive Director
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
6202 Aviation Drive
Roanoke, VA 24012
Dear Ms. Shuck:
Attached is a copy of Resolution Na. 62392-11 approving a specific
capital expenditure for the acquisition by the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission of the purchase of an aircraft rescue and fire
fighting vehicle. This resolution was adopted by the Board of
Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 23, 1992.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Attachment
cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
® Regded paper
O~ pOANp,I.~
~ ~ 9
2
~ aZ
~~~~~
~~ ~~~~~~
18
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ELMER C. HO~GE LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN
(703) 772-2004 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGISTERU-L DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL OISTRIC7
June 24
1992 O
D
IS
, CAVE SPRIN
TRICT
G
MAGISTERIAL D
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
l=ather Kenneth Stofft
Our Lady of Nazareth
2505 Electric Road, S. W.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Father Stofft:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the
invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, June 23, 1992.
We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the
Board is very grateful for your contribution.
Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us.
Sincerely,
Lee B. Eddy, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
LBE/bjh
® Regded Paper
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1992, in the Community Room
of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on a Special Exception Request of Reinhold
Arnold Winnemuth to operate a barber shop at 5221-A Starkey Road,
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: June 3, 1992 ~ ~~~cJ
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, June 9, 1992
Tuesday, June 16, 1992
Direct the bill for publication to:
Roanoke County Planning Department
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2068
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1992, in the Community Room
of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Workman Oil Company to
rezone 0.893 acre from B-1 and B-2 to B-2 to operate a convenience
store with gas dispensers, located at 3202 Peters Creek Road,
Catawba Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: June 3, 1992 ~ Q-~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, June 9, 1992
Tuesday, June 16, 1992
Direct the bill for publication to:
Workman Oil Company
Attn: Mike Duncan
PO Box 4332
Lynchburg, VA 24503
(804) 239-6933
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1992, in the Community Room
of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Valley Motorsport to rezone
approximately 1.615 acres from B-1 and R-1 to B-2 to operate a new
car dealership, located at the corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer
Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: June 3, 1992
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, June 9, 1992
Tuesday, June 16, 1992
Direct the bill for publication to:
George Logan
c/o Valley Motorsport
6900 Peters Creek Road, NW
Roanoke, VA 24019
(703) 366-4830
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at the
County Administration Center, Community Room, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, will on June
23, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, hold a public
held on the question of the adoption of a Resolution pursuant to Section 15.1-238(e) of
the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, concerning acquisition of and immediate right-of-
entry to a portion of a parcel of real estate (Tax Map No. 95.01-1-46) and necessary
easement by Roanoke County. The property in question is a 100' by 100' parcel (plus
permanent and temporary easements) located in the southwest corner of a 13.74 acre tract
of real estate owned by Roger E. Vest and Sharon M. Vest.
Any member of the public may appear at the time and place aforesaid and address
the Board on the matter aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Please publish on the following dates:
June 14, 1992
June 21, 1992
Please send bill to:
~~-`='~'
Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire
Roanoke County Attorney
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24108
c:\wp57 Vornu\condemn\public.not
of aoaNO~"F
~ ~
z ~
°v s
a
~ 38
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
June 18, 1992
C~~~xxY# ~~ ~~xxY~.~.~
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
Mr. Roger E. Vest
7892 Five Oaks Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Vest:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Per our phone conversation, I am deferring any condemnation
action on your property until the July 14 Board of Supervisors
meeting. This matter had been scheduled for Board action at their
June 23 meeting and is being deferred because you had previously
planned to be out of town that week.
Our purpose in wanting to acquire a portion of your land is to
drill a well to supply water to residents in that area. It is my
understanding that we can proceed with the drilling of the well
during the time that you are away.
Between now and July 14 we will continue discussions to try to
resolve this matter to our mutual benefit. If you are in agreement,
please so indicate by signing one copy of this letter and returning
it to me.
Very truly yours,
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ECH/meh
Enclosure
cc - Mr. Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Mr. Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility Department
Mrs. Mary H. Allen, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
~j ~~
!/~ ~,
~_ , -
Roge E. Vest
® Recyded Paper
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 23, 1992, at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
Virginia, at the session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public
hearing on the following:
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 81391-6 WHICH AUTHORIZED
THE ASSESSMENT OF FEES AS PART OF THE COSTS IN CRIMINAL
AND TRAFFIC CASES FILED IN COURTS OF THE COUNTY FOR
CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR MAINTENANCE OF COURTHOUSE,
JAIL OR COURT-RELATED FACILITIES, BY PROVIDING FOR AN
EXPANSION OF THIS FEE TO INCLUDE CIVIL ACTIONS AND FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
Publish on the following dates:
June 9, 1992
June 16, 1992
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN
n. :Y
~~
1, ~,~+
~~~
w,:
L
/~ ~ -j
Paul M. Mahoney ~,
County Attorney
Roanoke County, Virgini~ ~~~-~-~
~~ ~~~~~
{ ~`'* ...
~ ~~
pr
~~~ ~ 1
~~'° '' U~
~. ~~,U
__ ;,1~, ,
}
~~ a
~/
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 23, 1992, at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
~.~ session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold
Virginia , at the _...~-------
a public hearing on the following:
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ASSESSMENT OF FEES TAXED AS
COSTS IN EACH CIVIL, CRIMINAL, AND TRAFFIC CASE FILED IN
COURTS OF THE COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION OR
MAINTENANCE OF COURTHOUSE, JAIL OR COURT-RELATED
FACILITIES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates:
June 9, 1992
June 16, 1992
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN