Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7/28/1992 - Regular
~ pOAN ,~, F ~ ~ p Z z a 1838 ,~ ff ~.~,~ C~~ix~~~ .~# ~..~~xx~n~.e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JULY 28, 1992 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. There will be an Audit Committee Meeting at 2 p.m. in the County Administrator's Conference Room. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. HCN ABSENT AT 3:03 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND i ® Recycled paper AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 for Donation of a Rescue Boat to Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad. R-72892-1 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH HCN ABSENT D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Authorization to Conduct Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program on Privately Owned Sewer Facilities. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) A-72892-2 B .T MOTION TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO GO FORWARD WITH TESTING AND REPORT BACK IN 90 DAYS AND THAT THERE BE NO ENFORCEMENT OR FINES LEVIED DURING THAT TIME. URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Request for Funding for the Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) A-72892-3 BIzT MOTION TO APPROVE FUNDING OF $2,000 FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND URC WITH HCN ABSENT 3. Request for Appropriation of Donation Received from Millard Trussell. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) A-72892-4 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOr~Il1~NDATION URC WITH HCN ABSENT a E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, to Review Utility Projects in the Capital Improvement Program. WORK SESSION SET FOR 8/11/92 2. Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, on Expansion of the Sewage Treatment Plant. WORK SESSION SET FOR 8/11/92 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BIT MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING 2ND - 8/25/92 URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. An Ordinance to Amend Proffered Conditions on a 0.685 Acre Tract Zoned M-1 to Allow Automobile Repair and Wholesale Storage Warehouses, Located at 2730 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 2. An Ordinance to Rezone Approximately .25 Acre from B-2 to B-1, Located at 5314 Fallawater Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of G. L. Boone and J. A. Boone. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of Easements 3 and Property for the South Transmission Line and Starkey Road Water Projects. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 8/11/92 URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. An Ordinance Amending and Readopting Ordinance 71189-6 Concerning the Conveyance of 2.281 Acres of Real Estate (Southview) to the Commonwealth of Virginia, by Deleting the Reversionary Provisions, An Emergency Measure. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-72892-5 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AND WAIVE 2ND READING URC WITH HCN ABSENT I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) 0-72892-6 BLT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board LBE NOMINATED MRS. CHRIS PICKARD TO SERVE AONE-YEAR TERM AS ALTERNATES TERM EXPIRING 8/31/93 2. Grievance Panel 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 4 FM NOMINATED GLENN SIVERLING AND ROBERT TOHNSON TO SERVE FOUR YEAR TERMS EXPIRING 6/30/96. 4. Industrial Development Authority K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-72892-7 BLT MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. A-72892-7.a 2. Approval of Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. A-72892-7.b 3. Request to Accept Grant from Virginia State Library and Archives for VLIN Online Database Service for County Library. A-72892-7.c 4. Request for Appropriation of $675 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini-Grant. A-72892-7.d 5. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. A-72892- 7.e s 6. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation Concerning the Reporting of Property Taxes to the Federal Government. A-72892-7.f L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR TOHNSON REPORTED ON THE AUDIT CONIlVHZTEE MEETING AND ANNOUNCED A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT HAD BEEN AWARDED TO PEAK MARWICK M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMiVIUNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June 1992 5. 1991 Water Projects 6. Smith Gap Landfill RECESS AT 4:20 P.M. RECONVENE AT 4:30 P.M. O. WORK SESSION 6 1. Final Review of the Zoning Ordinance. BOARD CONSENSUS TO ADOPT ZONING ORDINANCE AT 8/25/92 MEETING WITH IMPLEMENTATION TO BE EFFECTIVE 12/31/92. ISSUES STILL PENDING - LOT SIZES AND LOT SIZES FOR TOWNHOUSES. TH TO BRING ADDENDUM ON 8/25 SHOWING CHANGES RESULTING FROM WORK SESSIONS. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to consider the acquisition of real estate and (7) for consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation: (a) Conner v. McGraw, et al and (b) Robertson v. Holt, et al FM MOTION AT 5:50 P.M. URC WITH HCN ABSENT Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-72892-8 B T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AT 7:04 P.M. URC WITH HCN ABSENT EVENING SESSION R PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Presentation by Virginia Amateur Sports. PRESENTED BY KENNETH KING, CHAIRIVLAN OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PRESENTED PLAQUES TO MARCIA PATTON, `TORN CHAMBLISS AND COUNTY. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on the Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-93. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) DARRELL BRANSTETTER SPOKE PRESENTING MAP WITH RECOMII~NDED CHANGES TO TALL OAK ROAD. LBE DIRECTED STAFF TO REVIEW FOR NEXT SIX YEAR PLAN. R-72892-9 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT FUNDING RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. A Resolution Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Sanitary Fill Stump Dump and Inert Material Landfill on a 74.86 Acre Tract, Located on the East Side of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) (PETITIONER HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE UNTIL AUGUST 25, 1992) TWO CITIZENS SPOKE FM MOTION TO REFER BACK TO PLAN1yING CONIlVIISSION URC WITH HCN ABSENT T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance amending and readopting Article I "In General" of Chapter 21, "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code by the Addition of a New Section 21-8 "Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Legal Action." (Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer) 0-72892-10 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. An Ordinance to rezone .9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to Allow Continuation and Expansion of an Existing Residential Use, Located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Martha C. Chinault. (Terry s Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) 0-72892-11 B T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT U. CITIZEN CONIlVIENTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE V. ADJOURNMENT BLOT MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 7:50 P.M. ~ pOAN ,~.~ a ~ p Z o a 1838 (~Snr~xxt#~ ~f ~..~~xx~~~te ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JULY 28, 1992 IEART 6 TIE !UE fmCi Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. There will be an Audit Committee Meeting at 2 p.m. in the County Administrator's Conference Room. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1 ® Headed paper 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 for Donation of a Rescue Boat to Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Authorization to Conduct Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program on Privately Owned Sewer Facilities. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 2. Request for Funding for the Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 3. Request for Appropriation of Donation Received from Millard Trussell. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, to Review Utility Projects in the Capital Improvement Program. 2. Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, on Expansion of the Sewage Treatment Plant. F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An Ordinance to Amend Proffered Conditions on a 0.685 Acre Tract Zoned M-1 to Allow Automobile Repair and a Wholesale Storage Warehouses, Located at 2730 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. H. I. J. 2. An Ordinance to Rezone Approximately .25 Acre from B-2 to B-1, Located at 5314 Fallowater Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of G. L. Boone and J. A. Boone. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of Easements and Property for the South Transmission Line and Starkey Road Water Projects. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 2. An Ordinance Amending and Readopting Ordinance 71189-6 Concerning the Conveyance of 2.281 Acres of Real Estate (Southview) to the Commonwealth of Virginia, by Deleting the Reversionary Provisions, An Emergency Measure. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Grievance Panel 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3 4. Industrial Development Authority K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. 3. Request to Accept Grant from Virginia State Library and Archives for VLIN Online Database Service for County Library. 4. Request for Appropriation of $675 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini-Grant. 5. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 6. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation Concerning the Reporting of Property Taxes to the Federal Government. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 4 M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June 1992 5. 1991 Water Projects 6. Smith Gap Landfill O. WORK SESSION 1. Final Review of the Zoning Ordinance. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to consider the acquisition of real estate and (7) for consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation: (a) Conner v. McGraw, et al and (b) Robertson v. Holt, et al Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS s 1. Presentation by Virginia Amateur Sports. S. T. U. v. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on the Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-93. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) 2. A Resolution Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Sanitary Fill Stump Dump and Inert Material Landfill on a 74.86 Acre Tract, Located on the East Side of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) (PETITIONER HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE UNTIL AUGUST 25, 1992) PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance amending and readopting Article I "In General" of Chapter 21, "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code by the Addition of a New Section 21-8 "Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Legal Action." (Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer) 2. An Ordinance to rezone .9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to Allow Continuation and Expansion of an Existing Residential Use, Located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Martha C. Chinault. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) CITIZEN COD~IlI~NTS AND COMML)NICATIONS ADJOURNMENT 6 ~ i P AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-1 OF APPRECIATION TO ROANORE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 FOR DONATION OF A RESCUE BOAT TO CATAWBA-MASON COVE RESCUE SQUAD WHEREAS, fire and rescue protection is an important service provided to County residents; and WHEREAS, the volunteer Fire and Rescue Squads of Roanoke County have a long history of outstanding service to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the support of the community is an important component of that service; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Lodge No. 284, Loyal Order of Moose, has donated to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad a swift water rescue boat and related equipment, which will be used in the event of flooding, or for rescue in the lakes, rivers and streams of the County; and WHEREAS, through this gift to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of the Mason Cove/Bradshaw area of the County, expresses deepest appreciation and thanks to the ROANORE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 and its membership for the support and benevolence which it has shown to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy None Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File T. C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue ~-i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JIILY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ROANORE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 FOR DONATION OF A RESCIIE BOAT TO CATAWBA-MASON COVE RESCUE SQUAD WHEREAS, fire and rescue protection is an important service provided to County residents;. and WHEREAS, the volunteer Fire and Rescue Squads of Roanoke County have a long history of outstanding service to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the support of the community is an important component of that service; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Lodge No. 284, Loyal Order of Moose, has donated to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad a swift water rescue boat and related equipment, which will be used in the event of flooding, or for rescue in the lakes, rivers and streams of the County; and WHEREAS, through this gift to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of the Mason Cove/Bradshaw area of the County, expresses deepest appreciation and thanks to the ROANORE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 and its membership for the support and benevolence which it has shown to Roanoke County. i ACTION # A-72892-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Conduct Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation Program on Privately Owned Sewer Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : I prefer to proceed with the testing and after the first ninety days of the testing we will review our findings with the Board. We can then decide whether or not to take enforcement action. We will also review our ordinances to see if it is feasible to retrict construction of basement facilities in areas where flooding may occur. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors approved the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program in 1986 to reduce the amount of infiltration and inflow into the Sanitary Sewer System. The SSE/R Program will extend the useful capacity of the public sewer facilities as well as reduce backup into customers homes. The SSE/R Program is divided into publicly owned facilities and privately owned facilities connected to the public sewer system. Staff has completed the public portion on two sewersheds and is currently working on the third sewershed. After the recent flooding in April of this year, residents of the Penn Forest area experienced difficulty with back up from the sanitary sewer system into their homes. Staff believes that the cause of this back up is improper discharge of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, which would be addressed by a private SSE/R program. A work session was held with the Board of Supervisors on July 14, 1992 concerning the need to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned facilities connected to the public system, and the session was attended by citizens from the Penn Forest area. The Board of Supervisors requested staff to prepare a Board Report detailing the proposed procedure for conducting the program. DISCUSSION The following procedure is proposed to conduct the SSE/R Program of privately owned facilities connected to the public sewer: 1 L .~-i (1) The privately owned facilities will be inspected only after completion of the public portion of the SSE/R Program in the sewershed to which the private facilities are connected. The only exception to this would be if a property owner requests that his or her sewer facility be inspected earlier. The program would begin in Penn Forest, as this area has the highest priority for the public SSE/R program. (2) The inspection will begin at the highest elevation in the sewershed or sub-area and proceed toward the lower portion. (3) Property owners will receive written notification prior to scheduling the inspection. This notification will include a form for property owners to sign giving the County permission to inspect their property. For those property owners that refuse to give permission to have their property inspected, an administrative search warrant under authority already provided by Article 18 of the Roanoke County Code. (4) Inspections of the interior portion of any building will only be conducted in the presence of the homeowner or their designee. (5) All inspections will be performed by County employees who will carry proper identification. The following work/inspection will be performed: (1) The sewer lateral will be excavated at the point where it crosses the property line or edge of sewer easement. The sewer lateral will be inspected by: (a) Internal TV inspection to the point it connects to the sewer main. Any discrepancies noted will be scheduled for repair. (b) Internal TV inspection as far as possible toward the building. A pressurized smoke test may be performed on this section. Any discrepancies will be noted for correction. (2) Any downspout connection, areaway drain, patio drain, or other external drains will be dye tested to determine if they are connected to the sewer system. Any connections found will be noted for correction. (3 ) Foundation drains will be tested by dye injection to determine if they are connected to the sewer lateral. Any connections found will be noted for correction. (4) A cleanout will be installed on the sewer lateral with a cap at grade. The lateral excavation will be backfilled and restored. 2 ~-I Note: For properties that have a cleanout at the property line, the above testing would be observed by inserting the TV camera into the cleanout or main sewer. (5) An internal inspection of the building sewer facilities will be conducted in the presence of the owner or designee and will include the following: (A) Test for pick-hole in floor drains that will permit groundwater to enter the sewer system. (B) Check for indication of leaking basement walls or floor that could enter the floor drains. (C) Check for sump pumps connected to or piped for connection to the sewer system. (D) Check for a foundation drain connected to the sewer system. Any discrepancies will be noted and explained to the property owner. (6) A general inspection will be made of the area outside the building to determine adequate grading, downspout diversion and sump pump outlet or other factors that may cause surface or groundwater to enter the building and eventually enter the public sewer through floor drains. Upon completion of the inspection, a complete report of the findings will be written by the inspector. This report will be reviewed by the Utility engineering personnel. A final report will then be prepared for the property owner detailing the results of the inspection along with some suggestions for correction of problems noted. This report will be sent to the property owner along with an offer to discuss the discrepancies on-site with the owner. After the property owner has corrected any improper connection or conditions, sufficient re-inspections will be made to insure corrections are completed. The Roanoke County Code already prohibits discharge of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and provides penalties for violation of that section. Violation of that part of the Code is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and penalties under that can include fines of up to $1,000 per day, and/or confinement in jail for not more than 12 months. Additionally, the County may also terminate the sewer and water connection. 3 ~-i ALTERNATIVE AND IMPACTS: Alternative No. 1 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedure outlined above. The property owner would be given six months to correct illegal facilities before enforcement action is taken under provisions of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code. Enforcement would involve pursuing the matter in Court, where the judge could impose the penalties outlined above. This alternative may result in the fastest correction of illegal facilities and result in the highest degree of protection to other users of the public sewer system, since it involves the threat of legal action and conviction of a crime. However, judges may be reluctant to find homeowners guilty of a Class I misdemeanor, particularly if they did not make or authorize the illegal connection. Alternative No. 2 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedures outlined above. The property owner would be given six months to correct illegal facilities. If corrections were not made at the end of six months, the County would terminate the sewer and water connection to the property until such time corrections have been made. Appeals from the termination can be made to the Board of Supervisors, and can be decided on a case-by-case basis. Customers will be notified prior to the action being taken, so that they will have the opportunity to appeal before service is terminated. The authority for this action is provided by Section 18-172 of the County Code. This alternative would result in correction of illegal facilities and protection of other users without the use of fines or court action on the part of the County. If the Board chooses this option, and enforcement problems develop, Alternative 1 could then be implemented, if necessary. Alternative No. 3 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedures outlined above. Correction of illegal facilities would be on a voluntary basis with no enforcement action taken on the part of the County. This alternative would result in information being provided to the property owners and would rely on their own conscience to make the required corrections. This alternative would also provide the County with information by which to quantify the magnitude of the 4 ~-i corrections required. However, it may also result in legal action from property owners who are being affected by the discharge, as the County would be knowingly not enforcing its own Code. Alternative No. 4 The Board of Supervisors would not authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities. This alternative would result in continued infiltration and inflow into the public sewer system from private facilities. This alternative will also result in continued sewer backup into homes even after the SSE/R Program has been completed. FISCAL IMPACT• The SSE/R program was approved by the Board in 1986, and staff and equipment is already in place. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to best protect the health, safety and welfare of all County sewer customers, staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve Alternative No. 1. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor aig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Substitute ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion No Denied ( ) to authorize staff to ao Eddy _ Received ( ) forward with testing and repor~ohnson _ Referred back in 90 days and that thereKohinke _ to be no enforcement or fines Minnix _ levied during that time Nickens cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Yes Absent x x x x x 5 1 ACTION NO. A-72892-3 ITEM NO. `Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funding for the Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~~~~„~ Cs-c.~+vr~~~.-c BACKGROUND: Since early 1991, Roanoke County has actively participated in the formation and operation of the Roanoke Regional Housing Network. The Network is comprised of representatives from Roanoke County, Salem, Roanoke City, and over 20 other regional agencies and associations. The common thread between all of these organizations is an interest in Roanoke regional housing issues. The Network is currently involved in a number of housing related initiatives. One of which is a proposal to invite the Enterprise Foundation to the Roanoke Valley to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the Valley's affordable housing needs and potential. The Enterprise Foundation is a national non-profit corporation. It's mission is to provide low-income persons decent and affordable housing. They currently are providing services and working on projects in over 60 cities in the United States, including Lynchburg, Virginia. Rather than take a primary funding role, the Foundation identifies local capacity to provide affordable housing. It then facilitates, coordinates and leverages these local resources for affordable private and public housing construction and rehabilitation. The cost of the Foundation's assessment is $10, 000 plus travel expenses. The Network has requested that Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and Salem each contribute $2,000 towards the cost. The Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority has also committed to a $2,000 contribution. The United Way has expressed an interest in contributing the remaining funds necessary. To date, Salem, Roanoke City and the Housing Authority have formally authorized their respective $2,000 contributions. ~-Z 2 I have attached to this report two brief documents that provide the Board additional information on the scope of the assessment and the products that we would receive. I have also place in your Reading File a copy of the assessment report undertaken for Lynchburg in 1991. Fiscal Impact• The fiscal impact of this request is $2,000. Staff recommends that funds be appropriated from the Board's Contingency Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board authorize the requested $2,000 contribution towards the cost of the Enterprise Foundations affordable housing assessment of the Roanoke region. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. ar gton Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) motion to approve funding Received ( ) 9f X2.000 from Board Referred Contingencv Plan to cc: File Terrance L. Diane Hyatt, Reta Busher, Harrrington, Director, Director, Finance Director, Management Vote No Yes Absent Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x Planning & Zoning & Budget C:\WPSIWGENDA\BR ENTER ~ -Z. The scope of the Assessment will cover the following: HOUSING NEEDS • Review existing statistics and studies regarding housing problems, housing needs of the low and moderate-income population and special populations, existing programs and plans. • Interview housing officials and key public and private leaders regarding their perception of needs. HOUSING PRODUCTION • Review annual production of housing, and other remedial efforts, including programs and activities of local government, nonprofit organizations, private developers, local housing authority, and banks. • Analyze basic categories of major housing efforts, typical costs and incomes of beneficiaries. HOUSING FINANCE • Review available funding mechanisms and levels of funding. • Analyze actual and potential availability of funding for new initiatives. PUBLIC LEADERSHIP FOR HOUSING INITIATIVES • Interview key housing officials and key public and private leaders regarding their perception of: a) new initiatives that should be undertaken; and b) the amount and source of support that these initiatives are likely to receive. • Determine whether consensus exists on: a) feasible new initiatives; and b) who should the beneficiaries, both in terms of target areas and income groups. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY • Review production trends among the various housing producers. • Interview key producers regarding the capacities and limitations of the local housing industry. HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY LINKAGE TO HOUSING PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION • Review community social service providers and their relationship to housing. • Interview social service providers regarding perceptions and needs in linking housing and social services. 3:~Nd V tl ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ a vi v vv v • ~v. vv ~.~ ~. ~-2 q EN'~'ER1'RISF FOUNAA-.T~ON CQMMUNI7.'Y A„SS + *'S~V1~N'~'S May 7, 1992 ~Phat are the purposes, ~ benefits, and outaome~ 4~ an Ent~lxpriaq Foundation aasee$ment of A aommunity~e housing needs, rp$ouxpea, and development patentials~ Jim Rouse has describes the purpose of an Enterprsie.~agseasmellt a~ answering "what are the real needs and the real conditions oP the poor, and what. resources can be mobilized~~ to addre~+3 th~~e conditions.l-Mora specifically, Enterprise oonducts assesamanta of every city that requests its assistance for these reaaonsi to learn as much as possible about the housing needs and conditions of the poor and the potentj.als for constructi~tg, rehab~.].itating, and preserving more low-income hous~.nq • to ascertain which cities have the commitment and capacity to develop afPoative partnerships • to increase the iikeiihood that the public, private aild nonprofit leader3 in tho cities selected for Enterpzi.a4 assistance are strongly committed to deve~.opinq and funding a public-private partnership far 1ow~ and moderate;incoma housing • to increase the likelihood that the capacity exists for partnerships to be effective and become self-suetain~.nq • to give selected cities and their pxi,vate and nonpza~it partnex:~ a signifi4ant head start toward developing the partner3hip • to determine if therE is a useful role for Enterprir~e~ in cities seeking our assistance • to outline a common agenda of issues and recommendattiona on which selected cities and the Enter^pr.ise Foundatio~a can determine a scope of work for further technical assi®tance • to h©lp cities that are not selected for enterprise assi,starice better understand the steps they need to take to improve their housing programs What do Enterprise's aotnmunity assesementg contain and addr®®e7 ~~'amss jQ. Rouse, ~.unCtl~sGn speech at they Enterprise NotWork Conference, October 12, 190. l ~~~ • an articulation of Enterprises mission to make all houe~.ng fit and affordable within a generation as a platform t~n h~l~ low income peopl8 up and out of poverty • a review of the local housing environment, incl~.~ding i$su~9 of housing supply, demand, and other market forces and dynamics • an a3aasomont of local gavernmantal housing reso~trc~s~ and programs • an examination of nonprofit and for profit affordable housing production and oapacity~as Well as existing pub~.ic/private partnership operations an identification of resources that are or could be directed at the production and preservation of low-income housing from public and private sector,sourocc • an assessment of the potent~.al f~'or new or expanded public/priate partnersh~.p aetj.vitiep • suggested strategies to help the community respond to its 1ow- ir7~:ome housing Heads and cha~.leng®:s, including spQCiPio programs that cQuid be undertaken with and without the assistance of The Enterprise foundation Tf an Enterprise assessment could b~ b4i~.ed down to A hAnklful of key questions, what woulA they be7 • What are the ~Qu~,~ng conditions and ~.4~~sing needs of the ~ow-- and moderate-income population? • What ~gsources ars currently laei,ng used and what resolix~e~ might potentially be used to address the housing needs of the low- and moderate income population? • What is thB community's low- and moderate-income d~ve~ mn ent capacity (for-profit. and non-profit)? • What are the ,.potentials for the creation of pupllc-px'Ly~te ~s s addressing the specific housing needs, resouK'oes, And capacities of the. locality? • What are the basic elements of a public-primate pap~nershl~2 develvpmett 5tratagy_ and a low- and moderate-inoomQ housing program for the community to pursue? - 2 ACTION NO. A-72892-4 ITEM NUMBER ~ , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation of Donation Received from Millard Trussell COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On July 13, 1992, Mr. Millard Trussell sent a $1,000 donation to the County as a token of his appreciation to the County and its citizens. He did not specify how this contribution should be used and asked that we make that decision. I have sent a letter to Mr. Trussell thanking him for his generosity and for allowing us to determine how to use his donation. I believe this amount could be very helpful in addressing the needs of the County's disabled persons, especially in view of the recent Americans with Disabilities Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept Mr. Trussell's $1,000 donation and direct Diane Hyatt, Finance Director, to set up an escrow account entitled "Millard Trussell Escrow Account for Disabled Persons". There are many citizens, and employees, too, who are disabled in some way. It has been suggested that we use the funds for playground equipment for children with disabilities. It also has been suggested that we use it to improve access to some of our buildings or parks for the disabled. The Employee Advisory Committee will review the possible uses and make a recommendation to the Board in the near future. At such time as the money is distributed, I would like to invite Mr. Trussell to a board meeting for appropriate recognition. Approved b , Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ~+~' ;~ ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke Denied ( ) to app_rov ~ aff r o m nda ion Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Eddy _ Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Yes Abs ent _x- cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Diana Wilson, Chairman, EAC ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ +' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, to Review Utility Projects in the Capital Improvement Program. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting that time be set aside on the August 11, 1992 agenda for a work session to review the utility projects in the Capital Improvement Program. Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session on August 11, 1992, on Expansion of the Sewage Treatment Plant COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting that time be set aside on the August 11, 1992 agenda for a work session on expansion of the sewage treatment plant. Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NO. '~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for August 25, 1992. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on a 0.685 acre tract zoned M-1 to allow automobile repair and wholesale storage warehouses, located at 2730 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. 2. An ordinance to rezone approximately .25 acre from B-2 to B- 1, located at 5314 Fallowater Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of G. L. Boone & J. A. Boone. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR'3 OFFICE. •R G -I-z STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 25, 1992. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 2, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~`~.~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs Date Rec .: ~• ~ ~~ Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANORB COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION G- i wner's Name: ~ ~ ~ ~ Phone: 6 ~ {Gw 1. • Address: ~b 13Gk ~ ~ 2-~ ~~8~~~~-, V ~ 2~~ ~ / 2. Applicant's Name: Address: 3. Location of Property: Tax Map Number(s): 4. Magisterial District: 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: 7. Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffer/s,.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ~~ lJ 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of P operty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's A nt: Signature Date Phone: 6 ~ e ws ~~ c- -- I w ,~ . s -! C 6ti~ Y1 , l ~ S '• HUBBARD SERVICE DEPARTMENT ` ' 4909 Cove Road NW P.O. Box 7426 Roanoke, VA 24019-0426 (703)562-1600 FAX (703)562-0407 1-800-284-8361 June 16, 1992 Letter of Application We propose to lease 1500 s/f of our back building at 2730 Peters Creek Road, Roanoke, Va. We have a one year lease with "D & A" Automotive Service" owned by Chris Davis and Robert Altizer to be used as an automobile repair shop. Si cerely, Tommy' ubbar , President/Owner P.S. It is understood in their lease that there is not to be any outside storage and there is only to be four outside parking places. HUBBARD SERVICE DEPARTMENT 4909 Cove Road NW P.O. Box 7426 Roanoke, VA 24019-0426 (703)562-1600 FAX (703)562-0407 1-800-284-8361 Virginia: Before The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County 2730 Peters Creek Road Amended Pr ff r Conditions Tax Map #37.17-01.05 0.68 acre June 16, 1992 Petition of Tommy Hubbard, Jr. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. In accordance with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et set of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Tommy Hubbard, Jr., hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia certain conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. 1. No outside storage of materials. 2. The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, administrative and other purposes, reasonably related to the acitivities above described. Also under M-1 (Permitted uses enumerated) #2 Automobile painting, up- holstering, repairing, reboiling, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling. #10 Wholesale business, storage warehouses; Respectfully submitted, l~ Tommy Hubbard, Jr. • . • ~~ ~ :~~• ~' W .~~~•' 4 , .1:04:77...1• ~ 1 '.~' e+vi rl,ri lrllH ~ ~ ' ': ~~:? ~: rl~t~it,~c r s, r tYi ro Y. ~, q~p, M l.-YUIM 'T~ ~ rl ~,': r1~~......~ ~* ~~' ~ A t 1-'U7fnl11.eee-r _ ~; Vii, 1, 1 •i.~lL:~tsc~ ff`~.~~~~y~~~ H~ a an r~xr1 h/ vie ti eM '-- ~ ~"r`'V14 fM1 1! ~ ~ MlY 11 !I Itn~ ~q~ '• ,ti V~ ~ ., ~- ~ t •M~. ~ ~. , ; . ~ ' = 3 l ~ ~ n •. s Ath JSIONI'OY ~ M ~. i 1.~,f ~1. u~ ft v.n Or+s1H pi oil H`,RV !l r~~e 11 rr1K1/ra~~ • '(. ~' , - ... r ~ 7 tl -- . ~r -/ ~7j j ~;~5i ! ~ ~ o ~ ` - ` • ~ I j~' _ w - - - - s •: ,~ ~a :xc~ sa3 ~ ~~- ~~~. ~ _ •• • • n ~ V M ~ • a ~ w' r ~ S ~ _ r-•"~L ~~ ~ ~~ \ti• a` ~ti t` v, ~t 0 o~'~ .Dt~ -;, ;~ . ~ _~ ~ ~~ Z 1~ ~ ~- ~ (1J ! r ulwol t kobu~r,N ~ Nnrb~ ~ to re flit, rrt ; ~ Thomas R. Hubbard, Jr. ~~ ~v~rMUtvrr r girt v~~;ti~ ~srw nr+~rntnn~in~rw 37.17-1-5 ~ ~ j` /; j~ / ~ ~ / 7 '~ o ', x r '~ , ~ r <. ~,, ,* O ~ ~ i~ ~\ +/ o --- ~ ` `• ~ ~__ ~ r ,, y~`_.__~ , x o ~ -~-' ;, x _ _ ~~ i \ r "' ` / x ~ ~ ~ ~.~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ i ~~ . "i O ` ~~ E `~ \' \ - \- ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~, .~ _ ~, ~~' ,~ ~~\', ~ X r ~' 0 ~ ,, ~, _- _ \\ \\ ` - _ b \ ~ "\' ~ O Q ---~~ ` ~ 1 tt -.. ~ : +~ -~ ~ ~ ~ t y f: ~ \ \~ ~' _ ~_ ~ ~` 1''~.. .,. 1 '~ ___` . - ~__ --- ~~' ° 1 _______- -_- - - - -- ~} ~ ,=- 1. I ~ _ ~. J,- ~ ~ J ~` ~~! } /~ t`~~ ~ .r --rte _ _ J- ~/ `,h ~ ~ . ~ J ~ > r rl ~ \ ~ i W 4 _ `' , ~\ ` a ~r p 1 W ~ ~ x - _ :~., :_ - / ..~ . ~ ~ ~: ~ . Y S~ ~`~ - ~,,. ~ ~ n ~ 4 '~ ~ 4 ~Y . ., ~ .... * ~. ~ ~ r 4 ~# 4 ~ t.'L ..F ~ 1 •~ ~M C i " _ ~tr ~ r ~ _ ?_, r ,gym ' ~ i c ?E~ ,, "'Kin' ry t_~. r ~ ~i;S' d - n~. • ~ "~ ~ g ` k , . ~£ ,7 ~ !+~ a .: .. , • ~Y a •J ':~ , w n ~ * ~ ~ ~ n. ~ ". ~ ~ ,~ ~ . t r ~ . t , ~ ~ 'A f 'o- •. Y ~ YYY "._ _ ~' ,, t 3 a ~' ,~ ,y}~ ._ .a..~ .. ^... ~ ~ L'C ~ S } A ~ , e~ ~ ?y'~ ~ c +' ~y ; s ~ ~ •c .~, _ y~ ~ r i 'Ap f~ } a~ y . . _ s ".. i. l,'F3~ y ~,. - ~. , • - .. ~ - ;: ~ ~ i Y ~ ~1.~ Y wow ~ ~ ~ ~~ W ' ' . _ t t " J ' ~ it M ; .. r t ~ } ~ - _. .. '" ti. x ,: •` ~ tom' F - r (~ ~ ., ; T. _ r.. ~ ,; , j n ` r E O ~.. L A ` 1t' w v4 i. , g A .s. D T • _ - 1 t`~-~. 'C ~-E ~ ~' .~ t ~ . y it S~ ,-~ L ~A ~ ~ , • ~ " v ~ - .Y 1.tif. ~ w~ :. ~ v .O l..~ ~ . _~`R' Ac •Q ':~.. A!i k~' S ~ yi ,. ~ 99 x, . .... 4 _4 ~ e 'All -L ~]1 Y d ~ ~. A R ~ I £ ~ v ~ l F "' _" y ''l~~ ~# ' ~... 5` 6 .ir' ~ ~ `~ ~ ~c fir. '." ......;~ # ~ ~ a.1~~ ~~rs~7u .~'~` ~,}, ~r ~i. .'i f ~ .{ h- ," . C~ ..a-4. ~.h ...K ' 1~" M~ A. it I ! ~+~- n"y{f .f~ {. ; i}y, tla fi %.. •y.~3. -7R• ~ ~K ~1r' ~ .~ aY '~~i4 ~ ~ A' ,~ - ~ x .. . v . . , . ,. v ter. ' - .• ~ - e ,, l ~ •. ~ ..- n . . X j. - 4 ..., y .. , " ~ ' - ry ' ~ ' " '"'7~, ~~ r .r `. ~~ ~ '' "~ i' k x ..~ l .. O ~ I ~ ,~ _-.,. ~ -- _ i X ,, f t. _ ~- .~ _ , _~ __ _ _. ,.. 1-' p ~ . ~ ` ~` U !7 ~ ~ o ~''~ ''j'' l ~ t ~( / / ,,,. ~~ "~-- / ~ /;~ ,. 0 __ _. }}-'-~--' ~,/ , -- ~_ ~; a ~- -_ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~a~ ~~ ~ Q ~ ~ /`~ e C ` ~ '` ~ ~ ~;! ~ ~ c,~",r ..~ , ,~ ~, - - ~ ~ ~.~~ ~„ ~~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ Y f ~ ~ t ~,~ f, r ~ \ ~ ~` ....... ~, i ~ ~~ i a ,r ~ ~~ ,y + ~, W ~ ,~,, ; ~. 2` _.. S`i 3 --.- w~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ._ ~ ~ __. ,_ o _~___ ~,, ,~ .~ ,, _-! .. .. ~ , _ ~ 1 ., _ _. - ~ _ _ __ x , ~ ,~ ~~` ~- /~~ x ~; ~ ~ / 1 r~ ' ~~,~~ n, ~ `~ l ~ ~ \ ~~ ~ _.~..._._ _ ` ,~ ~ _ ,~ ,~ ~,. ~~ , , ~~ r~ ~ w ,~ ~ ~ t ~~ ~~o ~ v, E., _ _ -~ .: ~ ,~ ~ K ~ ~ ~, Y - _ ,- ~ ~,,~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~M C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~- ~ __.__. ~._~_ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~_~ ~~ x ~ ''~ ~O , ~ ~ -~~ '!~ ~ ~ / o, ~ ~ ' f L~ ~, \. ~ i ~ ~ \ ,~ \\ \ F:. _ ~r~ - \ ~ x ~. - ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~. V ° ._ ~ - ---~ . . ~''~ k ~ a ,. ~ a s ~ w ~ , _-___., r w ~, ~ ~ \~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ 2~ ~ 'i ~` ~' x ~ W "~. F. !-. ~ i ~ ~, ~., af~- \ ~~ `` ~ ~ "ti t ~ . ~ \ -~ ,. 9S t 3. '' ~~ ~'~ r `~" _~~~` h c, . ~~`\ k x i_ X. x - -~"~ ' x ~~ } /~ 112__ ~--- ~ w J ~ I \ i 0 W ---~.. X x-I UX U ~ ~I ~ ,/ Q "I ~ X ~'~11 X J o~, J _-_ 0 Q - Date Rec.: Received By: • •` Case No.: .F Ord. No.: ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: ~, ~,~oop-G ~ y •~. ~joa~l~ Phone: ~~Z-q Address: ~o'~X g614" °~'~ t~/~, ~~~ 2. Applicant's Name: ~t~E Phone: Address : ~ikr~ 3 . Location of Property: ~3 ~~ ~~E'LtDU1M~ ',~7C,. S, In/. Tax Map Number(s) : 77 Iq- ~- 2¢ • 4. Magisterial District: CAE ~~} Ir1U 5. Size of Property: 7,67 X ?~./3 k,Zc-x l71•s7 x So.9SX g~•~ 6. Existing Zoning: ~j_T 2 W~CpIID~T~w~S Existing Land Use : ~~'(- 2arJ~ ~dX- ~! I p~U ~v~-F~~~KE - avT ~vo,0 Spa 7. Proposed Zoning: ~~~ _ Proposed Land Use: ~'~tf7iJ~t ~LLa*~ /~ ~-1 Zor~lHL~ 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No_~~ G-z. (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) gCl4{1 NE.~ ~/ 10. Value of Land and (~opaee~-) Buildings: (v~~~DO ~~•_~,g~~~1~ 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application Concept Plan / Metes and Bounds Description ~ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~- Vicinity Map / Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Pr rty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's g t Signatur Date ~ ~~ Z G -2 June 16, 1992 Department of Planning and Zoning Roanoke County Administration Center P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Sirs: Attached is my application for rezoning of 5314 Fallowater Drive, S.W., (Tax Map #77.19-1-24). I am requesting this property be rezoned from B-2 with conditions to its original zoning of B-1. The property is currently zoned for a.-video store and/or take-out food shop. Its conditional zoning is ext;.remely restrictive. Attached to the application for rezoning are the checked items listed in ,~11. Terry Harrington stated I did not need to provide a water and sewer application or a concept plan. We own the adjoining three houses which are all zoned B-1. The property was originally zoned B-1. We wish to have it rezoned back to B-1. Due to the economy we would currently lease this house as a residence. At some later date we envision tearing down this house and the adjoining three homes to build a small office park with architecture consistent with the architecture of our Boone & Company Office Park which is across the street. our e y BOONE & OM truly, ANY, REALTORS Le Bo e ' eside t /nms Attachments ^ Main OPfice / 13t. 419 ^ Hollins Office ^ 460 East Office 3906 Electric Road, S.W., P.O. Box 8614 7507 Williamson Road, P.O. Box 19704 3548 Orange Ave., N.E., P.O. Box 11963 Roanoke, VA 24014 ~~ Roanoke, VA 24019 /^~ Roanoke, VA 24022 ^^ (703) 989-0863 LJ ~~ - ' (703)366-2401 L (703)343-5800 U ~~_ ~~ i ~' ~~ ~` ~- - = `..~~" C~^S~o~Q i~l -~''---. i ~ ll~ _ 1. l ~ ' h`` ~`A L ~ D 1~~4'T~'/~ L19~vE ~ :~,,e ~eQ,~ s~,~,~bs ~~ d~~, ~o~~~~es ~ a_~e~rQ~,~ slr.~,~,bS ~obQ ~~~...~2~ ~~ ~ic.w,c babies ~ _Z', ~JOTE: This plot plan is a modification of a plot plan originally submitted by John Lee Davenport when this parcel was rezoned in 1990. TH 1 ROAgOEE COONTY -' ` OTILITY DEPARTMENT •' APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE ~ - TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date Name of Applicant G. L. /JOo~~., Phone '7'7.x- 9z y,~ Address of Applicant /~ O• ~oc ~'6/Y ~o,o,,,oF ~/,J a2yo_<y Name of Developer .~~C.~! ~ Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer /Vas`' ~' Phone_ Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person G• ~. /~o~:~-~ Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Nc'c.cJ (~ E/z.b n ~/~ ar- ~nr~n~P~...~r /7t~C~c~r~TP Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map): Size of proposed development in acres: Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. ~ ,( ~ 1 q?-- ~~I (OVER) Signature of Applicant -~ VICINITY MAP ~~. _ ~~~ I, ~ ', g CHERRY ~`' ~ > c+ : L i K IH14L PAR ~``':: ~~ ^~ R fT~~L` ~- 5 ~ E c\ f / .fE!! ~•!~~ tS I J fwd Rl~O! \KD\[ \V ~ LU DS( ,I NNI 4 D 1 ERIDGF ... ORO IRK r ~ ~~ ~. •~h ~c T 11 ~ °= 24017 Iw A CEY. Q rowERS SHOP. cTN. `, -- WINDS ~,- ;. WINDSOR e~ _ ~ Ey N~LLS ~ ,~~ ai ND n^oso f~ T, , '~ a g .. „ N 'Vt~'T~ k1~ ,, . P ,sH ~ ~\ V1RG1 ri C~BiR ~ ~ ~' ~*n'~t~~, S`,,,,,f:~J r~ J E F N_ _~ 1 ZZO M ,, 7JY~r'r • M R G~A{RST MILL PART r ~ .. ~~ ,PSI ~} t -r ~ LLJ ~. `AD Y "'y' R btRWl CK HT ~' : a o ~ ~ Oep' °i ! ~ ~ ~ T R d , \LLErD- sT• q(~N - •. J ~ 1 ET ~ NCH LS , Iw ~ .` .~~ r !off DR ~ 4'. a DR$AN $AUC I APT ~~'a ~RCVUE t ~ ~ 2 A ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 E~ ~IE ~ E$ - •~ r~~,~ • '~ ~~ • qtr ~'~ E •. ~X~,`• ~ vl STONE ES' F~ N,D \F~ITOOK t~ •!+~ , ~ ~ FE P ~ •.,~ g c~N D~ pb ~. t ~. ~ a ~~ ! f i ~ " YEM. ROA E CO. \ ~ Ea~f f.1p. F • '~.~ ~ - 1 :: CileR ~ N H~'• ~~ A4y ! SE a ITISENS~ [STS 3 ~.tILcS '. / ! 1'Ell • ~+ _ PO SE • fJf- j w ~ a !g °, ! L E1 TANGLE D MALL /,T ~ S : f' p• ~ ' ~K RESC u` HI ° ~~ 419 I, f~ T ILLS ,'. ROANOKE ~ \ s ~~E • ?l1~~ ~ ~ OJ bryM ',CAMPGROUfa ~. '"dl cca ur D •EMT fit' ` T"~ ~rP ~~$ ~ MISTO ~ w ~ w `,Cff J ~ ~ CINKARD COU T ~/f(EK fjs ~ t > F ` L• ~ ~ E~ y` iillll s AlNO H NO 55 SCH. ~1~ 1^ ! ` ~y~ '. I ti poJ~ ,p, PROF 551 L Aif ~ ~~ •~1..' ~ ~ JE ET ^ l~ ~ ~-'/(~ pp~~ ~ + PARK G. `t ,~ : ~ ~ M0/.~ 7 B ELY. ~' \ .~kL., i PINKAR~ ~ o E ~ e°. c R G C ^ T~ ~ F T~ Rp MAR IIS U c~ Iy NT ~ 7S3 • .. s FO LL t l0 ROff~ ~ ~ ~FLINF v ~ ~ 3 ,• ~ _ o = P N~ • f SARK ~ ~?Li~.~•T~D. !`~ 4' ~O ~ 6 EROK\ ~ ` STARKEy NURA HLL ELK 1 m o ~ ~ C C Yi LES 1 1fi^ ~~pT ~ ~` % U • CAVE Si RlN C~ 'r 4 '6 !OE p ~ 1~ + NUNTIN RLLS ~1 r f ~-y1R• ~ (E ' G LF COURS $ ~ D ./ a ~ V ~pING HI ~ f M~A» SET -KO R Y ~ Ro t ~'. R PENN F SO IE~N PINES 8 NU ILLS , ~mll 24014 ~~: ~~ .. ~.~~~~nOC ~ ~ YIIK+ IRD + h ~ \ p ~ TOURIST ^ HUY f • ~ ~, ~+f C•'IT'~~ r.~'[~atr .lr inn; CUI'NMUtr-i~ ~' Jts~cYiLa~ Boone and Boone ~ t-rn navQ~np~u~~rr 77.19-2-24 `\ ~ ~ A ` ~'"t-- ' ' ~~ S'~ ~ ~N\V '~ d1s- '_- _. , "f \\ cp p ~ ~,p `~J try ~. ~ / ter---~ ~ ~ J `1' t r"~ ~ ~f Oi ~ `~/+Qr ~ ~\ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ - . ~\M ~ r ~ ~ w ~ ~ ,. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ __ ~ i ~._ _ __ ~. ~..- _~ _ ~ „ I i. -~, ~ , A i _ ~, ~., ~~ , ~~, , ~ ~Y (^j Q ~ r~ V ._ ' ~ ~?- ~, }~ ~\ -fi ~ ~~ o ~ 1 /~ _ I `J ~i f ~~ \ ~ ~' ~ _ ~ - _ ~ ~~, BER A p , m .N ' / ' r/ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ f- ~ ,~ ! ~ ~~ ° I ~ I ~ r. j ~ Z bZtQQ _-~ II 1F. '1 ~ 'o ., //" , / ~ ~ ~ 1 ~9'SVO i , .. / ` , .. - .. _-~' ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ L . ; ~ ~ _ N r. ~ ~ M' ~ // I ~~/ ~ ~~44 ~ ~,~ 'S ~, ,. : ..~ ,.,~ ~ ' l f ( q ~ ~ ~ ~ ' u, S ~ ~ ~ 4 k .~ ~ F. _ ' y ~ i ~ ' ~ ){ { r f . ~ r l ~ T ~ /4.. e" y 7. _ ~ _ r. _ ~.~ :1 Y=~ },...~~ C .. w I .~ v .. `_ [.,{ _ ~, '`~ _~~- J ~/ i , .. l ~ \\ l;, v ` \) - - -- JJ ~ / ~ ~ . ~ } \ , ~ , ~ ~ \\ ~ ! A ~' ~ ~ ~,.a• ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~~ •~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ \\ i ~~ _~ .~ ,~ ' ~~"' ~ ~ -ti / l / i. ~; , 1 I ~ \ ~\ x ,i _ _- ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ '~ __, _ , ~~~ _._. -, ~ ~ _ ~ ,. -- I ~ `~ ~ `~ g ~~ <. ~~ ,~~~ ~,~ `.9 ' ~ - 3n1 0~`~ 2i w ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~l ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~-r~ C_..v ~ ~' , p j \ _ ~ ~ `~ ~~ n -- r t~--Y t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,,,,, _., 1 ~ "' -'~- Y ~ ~= ~ ~A ~ ~ ,~: ,, ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \\ ~%~~ ~. , ~ ~,. ~ L~ a vv` ~\ } ~. _~, ~ ,~ \~~!,~ ~ \ ~ ~biO o00 \ irc ~ ,~ ~ ~Y ~ N ~~ ~;~ - o~~ ~ ,, ~ . ~1., ~ ~~a \ ~ ~~ h ~ r 1 ~ „~ _ 1~ _~` -~ ~ 1 ti __~ ~ i -~ \ 1 ~~ /~ ~ r J ,\, F .,/ ~ ~ / ) 1 11 ~ ~ // /~ ~1 .. ~~ YV' l/ 1 ~~' d ~ ~ - ~ M , ~ ~ M ~ ~~i °a~- BER A p 1 ~ t i p f ~. ~ 1 Via., ~ ,~ O~ O n ? /K t, j~ ~ ~ 6i1i0 ~ ~ r- ,, 'i i`_ ~, _ t•_. . i ~/ , ..- ~, Y Y • ';,+~ ~`'' ~ ..1 'i { ~ ,t- r 1j~~L' ~ ' ;F: -/`. ` ` .' `~ ~ .M ^.~.~aA. ~~t' -~ -. 1. If.i. ' .. -- - `~ /~ \ \ /.~ ~'. ~ \~ ~ ~V~ .,rp~ _ ~, + ~ ~ 1 1~ ~,~ i m 1 ~ ~--` ~ ~ - ~.~-- -... _~ \ _, `.,~ , , ~ - ~ - V ~, , / ~.( x ~ i ) O ~ -~ i - --' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a N d ~~ __ ~ ~ ~-. ~. r~ i >.. g , l! ~ ~~ ~ ' . ~ ~ ! ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ l t ,-~ ~ ~ ' ,M'r-- , ~ i i ~ . l ~/ / ~ ~, K~ / / l ~ - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~~ 4 5 ~ ~< " ' .~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~~~ ~ l {~ ~ ~ ~ z .\ ~ \ ~ ~S F ~ { ~., n i ~ ~ ~ ',+ I ^~ / - _ ~i- ~ . r" _. _ :: ~ ~: . ,~ .; . . ACTION # ITEM NUMBER t" '- I_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Acquire Necessary Easements and Property to Construct the South Transmission Line and the Starkey Road Water Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~,C~,ysrw~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors has approved the South Transmission Line and Starkey Water Line Projects along with the appropriate funding. The above projects will involve acquisition of approximately 150 easements and one property. In order to secure the required property in a timely manner, staff will bring a partial list of affected properties for approval by the Board instead of waiting until all properties have been identified. An Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the first group of easements and acquisition of the pump station property is attached. The following is a list of properties involved: TAX MAP PROPERTY OWNER ACQUISITION 97.08-01-40 97.08-O1-42 97.08-01-41 97.08-01-39 97.08-01-38 97.08-01-37 97.08-01-36 97.08-01-35 97.05-01-26 97.02-O1-10 97.05-01-06 97.05-01-04 97.01-01-06 97.01-O1-05.2 97.01-01-03 97.01-01-1.1 Mills, Frank E. Casey, James W. Jr. & Margarette E. Mills, Frank E. Webb, William H. & Eva J. Pope, Reuben Eric & Dossie R. Austin, Jennie McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. Taylor, D. M. Heirs Palm Hermitage Corp. Guilliams, Lewis & Clyde Stoots, Gary & Susan Hackley, T. R. Knighton, Eugene B. Board, G. H. Blankenship, Edward & Lois Easement Property Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement N-1 TAX MAP 97.01-02-17 97.01-02-09 97.01-02-05 97.01-02-03 97.01-02-02 96.08-01-04 96.02-01-46 96.02-01-45 96.02-01-39 96.02-01-38 96.02-01-37 86.03-04-06 86.03-04-04 86.03-04-03 86.03-04-02.1 86.03-04-02 86.03-04-01.1 86.03-04-O1 86.03-02-09 86.03-02-07 86.03-02-03 86.03-02-02 86.03-01-38 86.01-03-01 86.01-01-49 86.01-O1-19 86.01-01-17 86.01-02-03 86.01-02-01 86.01-02-01.2 76.03-07-05.1 76.03-04-32 76.03-04-31 76.03-04-30 76.03-03-83 76.03-03-76 76.03-03-70 76.01-01-04 76.01-01-21 76.01-01-14 76.01-01-13 76.01-01-12 66.04-02-15 66.04-02-17 66.04-02-15.2 66.04-02-15.1 66.04-02-13 66.04-01-11 66.04-01-14 66.04-01-46 66.44-O1-19 66.04-01-18 66.04-01-17 66.04-01-16 66.04-01-15 66.01-01-07 PROPERTY OWNER Beasley, Nicholas H. Kidd, David E. & Virginia L. Steele, T. D. Janosko, George Janosko, George R. & Wanda C. Steele, T. D. Beasley, Nicholas H. Sigmon, Norma J. Gordon, Michael J. Musgrove, Bruce A. Mormon Church Ridgeway, Robert L. Et Als Muse, Paul T. Muse, Charles M. Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Metheny, Mary M. Martin, Frank W. Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. White, Charles E. & J. Kimberly Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Grisso, Edwin O. Minter, Marie H. Wirth, Verla S. Poage, Lewis S. Peoples, George D. & Deborah S. Arthur, David M. & Mollie B. Neal, Denver D. & Kum Cha Wertz, Bennie L. & Jean P. Boone, L. Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P. Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P. Minnix C. E. & Jessie V. Minnix C. E. & Jessie V. Wallace, Jean O. Jamison, V. E., M. A., & D. A. Porter, F. D. & McFarland, J. G. Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly Porter, Frank D., III, Et Al Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly Malley, Margaret L. Minnix, Roy W. & Evelyn K. Powell, Barbara B. Minnix, Roy W. & Evelyn K. Powell, Barbara B. Double R Corporation Swope, John D. & Emily P. Coates, Fred B., Jr., & Rita A. FFE Development Corporation Tetreau, Michael C. V. V. ACQUISITION Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Glowers, Jesse Wayne & Brenda Cronk Baron, Maryhelen F. Baron, Maryhelen F. Sears, Merriman N-I Staff would recommend that the cost of acquisition for easements and property be based on the following: (1) Acquisition of property for the pump station be based on 100•°s of the assessed value of the property. (2) Acquisition of easements not to exceed 40~ of assessed value of land plus any actual damage to improvements. FISCAL IMPACT' The cost of easement and property acquisition is included as part of the overall project budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the first reading of an Ordinance authorizing acquisition of easements at a cost not to exceed 40% of the assessed value plus cost of actual damage and property at a cost not to exceed the assessed value as needed for the South Transmission Line and the Starkey Road Water Projects. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffo aig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hod County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens H-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE SOUTH TRANSMISSION LINE AND THE STARKEY ROAD WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, location plans for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project have been completed and the projects will require acquisition of property and easements across certain properties; and, WHEREAS, said property and easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the water line project; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1992, and the second reading was held on August 11, 1992. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary easements and property for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Project are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition 97.08-O1-40 97.08-01-42 9?.08-01-41 97.08-01-39 97.08-01-38 97.08-01-37 97.08-01-36 97.08-01-35 97.05-01-26 Mills, Frank E. Easement Casey, James W. Jr. & Margarette E. Fee Simple Mills, Frank E. Easement Webb, William H. & Eva J. Easement Pope, Reuben Eric & Dossie R. Easement Austin, Jennie Easement McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. Easement McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. Easement Taylor, D. M. Heirs Easement H-i Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition 97.02-01-10 Palm Hermitage Corp. Easement 97.05-01-06 Guilliams, Lewis & Clyde Easement 97.05-01-04 Stoots, Gary & Susan Easement 97.01-01-06 Hackley, T. R. Easement 97.01-01-05.2 Knighton, Eugene B. Easement 97.01-01-03 Board, G. H. Easement 97.01-01-1.1 Blankenship, Edward & Lois Easement 97.01-02-17 Beasley, Nicholas H. Easement 97.01-02-09 Kidd, David E. & Virginia L. Easement 97.01-02-05 Steele, T. D. Easement 97.01-02-03 Janosko, George Easement 97.01-02-02 Janosko, George R. & Wanda C. Easement 96.08-01-04 Steele, T. D. Easement 96.02-01-46 Beasley, Nicholas H. Easement 96.02-01-45 Sigmon, Norma J. Easement 96.02-01-39 Gordon, Michael J. Easement 96.02-01-38 Musgrove, Bruce A. Easement 96.02-01-37 Mormon Church Easement 86.03-04-06 Ridgeway, Robert L. Et Als Easement 86.03-04-04 Muse, Paul T. Easement 86.03-04-03 Muse, Charles M. Easement 86.03-04-02.1 Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Easement 86.03-04-02 Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Easement 86.03-04-01.1 Metheny, Mary M. Easement 86.03-04-01 Martin, Frank W. Easement 86.03-02-09 Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. Easement 86.03-02-07 White, Charles E. & J. Kimberly Easement 86.03-02-03 Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. Easement 86.03-02-02 Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S. Easement 86.03-01-38 Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H. Easement 86.01-03-01 Grisso, Edwin O. Easement 86.01-01-49 Minter, Marie H. Easement 86.01-01-19 Wirth, Verla S. Easement 86.01-O1-17 Poage, Lewis S. Easement 86.01-02-03 Peoples, George D. & Deborah S. Easement 86.01-02-O1 Arthur, David M. & Mollie B. Easement 86.01-02-01.2 Neal, Denver D. & Kum Cha Easement 76.03-07-05.1 Wertz, Bennie L. & Jean P. Easement 76.03-04-32 Boone, L. Easement 76.03-04-31 Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P. Easement 76.03-04-30 Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P. Easement 76.03-03-83 Minnix C. E. & Jessie V. Easement 76.03-03-76 Minnix C. E. & Jessie V. Easement 76.03-03-70 Wallace, Jean 0. Easement 76.01-01-04 Jamison, V. E., M. A., & D. A. Easement 76.01-01-21 Porter, F. D. & McFarland, J. G. Easement 76.01-01-14 Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly V. Easement 76.01-01-13 Porter, Frank D., III, Et Al Easement 76.01-01-12 Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly V. Easement 66.04-02-15 Malley, Margaret L. Easement 66.04-02-17 Minnix, Roy W. & Evelyn K. Easement 66.04-02-15.2 Powell, Barbara B. Easement I(-~ Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition 66.04-02-15.1 Minnix, Roy W. & Evelyn K. Easement 66.04-02-13 Powell, Barbara B. Easement 66.04-01-11 Double R Corpora tion Easement 66.04-01-14 Swope, John D. & Emily P. Easement 66.04-01-46 Coates, Fred B., Jr., & Rita A. Easement 66.04-O1-19 FFE Development Corporation Easement 66.04-01-18 Tetreau, Michael C. Easement 66.04-01-17 Glowers, Jesse Wayne & Brenda Cronk Easement 66.04-01-16 Baron, Maryhelen F. Easement 66.04-01-15 Baron, Maryhelen F. Easement 66.01-01-07 Sears, Merriman Easement 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40~ of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any. Fee simple property acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 100 of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project funds; and, 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp57 \agenda\realest\trans.so 0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-5 AMENDING AND READOPTING ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 CONCERNING THE CONVEY- ANCE OF 2.281 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOIITHVIEW) TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BY DELETING THE REVERSIONARY PROVISIONS THEREOF, AN EMER- GENCY MEASURE WHEREAS, on July 11, 1989 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 0-71189-6, which authorized the acceptance and acquisition of 6 acres of real estate (Southview) from the Roanoke County School Board, and further, authorized the conveyance of 2.281 acres thereof to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the construction of a forensics laboratory, and, WHEREAS, paragraph 5 of said ordinance directed that a reversionary clause be incorporated in any deed of conveyance to the Commonwealth, and, WHEREAS, it now appears that the reversionary clause consti- tutes an impediment to the issuance of bonds by the Virginia Public Building Authority to finance the construction of the proposed forensics laboratory on said property, and, WHEREAS, since the Virginia Public Building Authority proposes to price the bonds on July 28, 1992, and to execute the formal Bond Purchase Contract on July 29, 1992, time for appropriate action is critical, and, WHEREAS, upon the request of bond counsel for the Virginia Public Building Authority and upon the assurances contained in the preliminary official statement, it appears necessary and appropri- 1 1 ate to authorize the removal of the reversionary clause from the original deed, and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1992, and since an emergency exists, that the second reading of this ordinance be dispensed with, in accordance with Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 0-71189-6 is hereby amended and readopted, by the deletion of paragraph 5 of said ordinance, said paragraph reading as follows: That if the Commonwealth of Virginia ceases to utilize said property for a forensics laboratory, then said property shall revert to the County. Further, if the Commonwealth does not commence construction of a foren- sics laboratory facility on this property by June 30, 1993, then said property shall revert to the County. 2. That the conveyance of 2.281 acres of real estate to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of constructing a forensics laboratory is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a deed of correction removing the reversionary clause contained in the original deed, and such other documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transac- tion, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That an emergency exists requiring the immediate adoption of this ordinance, dispensing with the second reading thereof. 2 This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance and waive the second reading, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Gerald Holt, Sheriff Skip Burkart, Commonwealth's Attorney 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28,1992 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 CONCERNING THE CONVEYANCE OF 2.281 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOUTHVIEW) TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BY DELETING THE REVERSIONARY PROVISIONS THEREOF, AN EMERGENCY MEASURE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~,,~~,,,~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This ordinance amends an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on July 11, 1989, which authorized the conveyance of 2.281 acres of real estate to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the construction of a forensics laboratory. The amendment removes a reversionary clause running to the benefit of the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On July 11, 1989 the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of 2.281 acres of real estate (being a portion of the 6 acre Southview tract acquired from the School Board) to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the construction of the forensics laboratory. This ordinance included the following reversionary language: 5. That if the Commonwealth of Virginia ceases to utilize said property for a forensics laboratory, then said property shall revert to the County. Further, if the Commonwealth does not commence construction of a forensics laboratory facility on this property by June 30, 1993, then said property shall revert to the County. Bond counsel for the Virginia Public Building Authority has advised this office that this reversionary provision constitutes an impediment to the ability of the Authority to issue bonds to finance the proposed forensics laboratory. Bond Counsel requests that the Board authorize the execution and delivery of a deed of correction removing the reversionary clause contained in •the original deed. Bond counsel's correspondence is attached, which describes the necessity for the requested action, outlines the H -Z timetable for Authority action (pricing the bonds on July 28, 1992 and signing bond purchase contract on July 29, 1992), and provides evidence that the project's financing appears to be a certainty. A copy of the Preliminary Official Statement is also available. If the Board fails to authorize the removal of the reversion- ary clause, then I have been informed that this project will be deleted from the bond issue. The attached ordinance amends the previously adopted ordinance by authorizing the removal of the reversionary clause. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the removal of the reversionary clause from the original deed, which includes waiver of the second reading. 2. Refuse to adopt the proposed ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although the proposed ordinance places the County at some risk with respect to the concerns that originally motivated the Board to include the reversionary clause in the transaction, it appears that there now exists a greater risk of losing the entire project. Therefore staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed amending ordinance authorizing the removal of the reversionary clause. Respectfully submitted, < rn. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 N-z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 CONCERNING THE CONVEYANCE OF 2.281 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOUTHVIEW) TO THE COM- MONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BY DELETING THE REVER- SIONARY PROVISIONS THEREOF, AN EMERGENCY MEASURE WHEREAS, on July 11, 1989 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 0-71189-6, which authorized the acceptance and acquisition of 6 acres of real estate (Southview) from the Roanoke County School Board, and further, authorized the conveyance of 2.281 acres thereof to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the construction of a forensics laboratory, and, WHEREAS, paragraph 5 of said ordinance directed that a reversionary clause be incorporated in any deed of conveyance to the Commonwealth, and, WHEREAS, it now appears that the reversionary clause consti- tutes an impediment to the issuance of bonds by the Virginia Public Building Authority to finance the construction of the proposed forensics laboratory on said property, and, WHEREAS, since the Virginia Public Building Authority proposes to price the bonds on July 28, 1992, and to execute the formal Bond Purchase Contract on July 29, 1992, time for appropriate action is critical, and, WHEREAS, upon the request of bond counsel for the Virginia Public Building Authority and upon the assurances contained in the preliminary official statement, it appears necessary and appropri- 3 N-~ ate to authorize the removal of the reversionary clause from the original deed, and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1992, and since an emergency exists, that the second reading of this ordinance be dispensed with, in accordance with Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 0-71189-6 is hereby amended and readopted, by the deletion of paragraph 5 of said ordinance, said paragraph reading as follows: That if the Commonwealth of Virginia ceases to utilize said property for a forensics laboratory, then said property shall revert to the County. Further, if the Commonwealth does not commence construction of a foren- sics laboratory facility on this property by June 30, 1993, then said property shall revert to the County. 2. That the conveyance of 2.281 acres of real estate to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of constructing a forensics laboratory is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a deed of correction removing the reversionary clause contained in the original deed, and such other documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transac- tion, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That an emergency exists requiring the immediate adoption of this ordinance, dispensing with the second reading thereof. 4 N-z This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. C:\WP51\AGENDA\REALESTPORIAB.ORD H-Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 11,.,1989 ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF 6 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOUTHVIEW) FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF 2.281 ACRES, BEING A PORTION THEREOF, TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading on this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989; and a second reading was held on July 11, 1989. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a portion of the subject real estate is --_ _ being mm-tee -.=ava'l:~a~°~e to the Commonwealth of Virginia for other public uses, namely, the State Forensics Laboratory. 3. That the acceptance and acquisition of six (6) acres of real estate from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. 4. That the conveyance of 2.281 acres or real estate, being a portion of that real estate conveyed to the County by the Roanoke County School Board, to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of constructing a forensics laboratory, is hereby authorized and approved. 5. That if the Commonwealth of Virginia ceases to utilize said property for a forensics laboratory, then said property shall revert to the County. Further, if the Commonwealth does not H-z commence construction of a forensics laboratory facility on this property by June 30, 1993, then said property shall revert to the County. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: -_ _ _ ~. - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supevisors _ ----- - - _-- - - -- - - - -Paul Mahoney,--=County Attorney Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Mike Kavanaugh, Sheriff Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney 2 1-1- Z W I L LC OX & SAVAG E, P.C. TOY D. SAVAGE, JR. PHILIP G. DENMAN PALMER S. RUTHERFORD, JR. JOSEPH A. LEAFE HUGH L. PATTERSON WILLIAM E. RACHELS, JR. ALLAN G. DONN CONRAD M. SHUMADINE THOMAS G. JOHNSON. JR. JOHN Y. PEARSON. JR. JAMES C. HOWELL RONALD P. DONN ROSS C. REEVES JAMES R. WARNER, JR. THOMAS A. RUCKER ANTHONY M. THIEL GUY R. FRIDDELL, III BRUCE T. BISHOP PETER M. HUBER WILLIAM W. HARRISO N, JR. KEITH C. CUTHRELL, JR. STEPHEN W. BREWER JAMES S. MCNIDER, III WALTER D. KELLEY, JR. JEFFREY H. GRAY MARSHALL B. MARTIN ROBERT L. DEWEY KENNETH B. TILLOU WARREN L. TISDALE PETER G. ZE MANIAN SHEILA RYAN HORNE JAMES J. WHEATON RANDY D. SINGER S. BERNARD GOODWYN DAVID C. BOWEN JOYCE JACKSON WOOD JEFFREY W.BREESER STEPHEN R. DAVIS SHAREN PADGETT HUGHES LATANE WARE BROWN GARY A. BRYANT STEPHEN R. JACKSON JOHN S. WILSON WILLIAM M. FURR ALAN F. GARRISON SUSAN SHAW HULBERT DAVID A. SNOUFFER MARK D. STILES JOHN F. FABER, JR. KEVIN L KELLER PETER T. FARIEL PETER V. CHIUSANO AMY LYNN MOSS J. STEVEN PATTERSON OF COUNSEL FR EDERIC A. NICHOLSON ELIZABETH HOVES ESINHART t; ~~ I j ~~ ; ' II .. 1/ ) -~..... ...ra...... ~.. .- ... ...-~..~~-. ~... ~~atiM ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1800 NATIONSBANK CENTER ONE COMMERCIAL PLACE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 2 3 510-219 7 NORFOLK: (804) 628-5500 PENINSULA: (804) 875-1429 FACSIMILE: (804) 628-5566 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (804) 628-5565 VIA FEDERAL E%PRESS July 20, 1992 Paul Mahoney, Esq. County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Roanoke County Conveyance of 2.281 Acres to the Department of General Services for Construction of a Planned Forensic Laboratory Dear Paul: Reference is made to the Deed from the County of Roanoke to the Commonwealth of Virginia, recorded in Deed Book 1370 at Page 357. In the Deed, Roanoke County reserved a reversionary right if the aforesaid property is not operated by the Commonwealth of Virginia as a forsensic laboratory or if the Commonwealth of Virginia does not commence construction by June 30, 1993. I have advised you that this language constitutes an impediment to the ability of the Virginia Public Building Authority to issue Bonds to finance the proposed Forensics Laboratory. The Virginia Public Building Authority plans to issue on August 13, 1992 its state building revenue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $175,000,000 of which $9,356,500 has been allocated to the Roanoke Forensics Laboratory. Enclosed herewith please find a Preliminary Official Statement which has already been released by the Virginia Public Building Authority in connection with the proposed issuance of Bonds. H-2 WILLCOX & SAVAGE, P.C. Paul Mahoney, Esq. July 20, 1992 Page 2 The Virginia Public Building Authority proposes to price the Bonds on July 28, 1992, and will sign a formal Bond Purchase Contract with its Underwriters on July 29, 1992. The purpose of my letter is to provide satisfactory evidence to you and the County Board of Supervisors that the Project's financing appears to be a certainty and the request that the County Board of Supervisors approve the execution and delivery of a correction Deed removing the reversionary clause contained in the original Deed. The removal of such reversionary clause is absolutely mandatory before the Virginia Public Building Authority can take title to the real property and cause the issuance of Bonds to finance the construction of the forsensic laboratory. Please call me if you should have any questions in regard to this matter. Very truly yours, William W. Harrison, Jr. WWH:we Enclosure cc: Barbara H. Vann, Esq. Susan F. Dewey r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-6 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. an electric line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on July 14, 1992; a second reading was held on July 28, 1992; and 3. That the electric line easement across property owned by Roanoke County (Stonebridge Park) for Appalachian Power Company upgrades the power lines to the East Vinton Plaza; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the offer of the Appalachian Power Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 1 a On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company Across the side of Stonebridge Park II. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' Appalachian Power Company is seeking an easement across the southern side of Stonebridge Park II to upgrade the power lines to East Vinton Plaza. The proposed easement does not interfere with the athletic fields and normal operation of the park (see attached map). The attached ordinance is submitted for your consideration and covers the legal requirements of the County's charter. The first reading of the ordinance was held on July 14 and the second reading and public hearing is scheduled for today's meeting. FISCAL IMPACT' Appalachian Power Company has offered one dollar ($1.00) to bind this easement. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the attached ordinance. ~,Respectfu~ ly submitted, Approved by, r ~. (' ~ / ~l ~~ John M. Chambliss,~~'r. Elmer C. Hodge ''Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. an electric line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on July 14, 1992; a second reading was held on July 28, 1992; and 3. That the electric line easement across property owned by Roanoke County (Stonebridge Park) for Appalachian Power Company upgrades the power lines to the East Vinton Plaza; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the offer of the Appalachian Power Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\realest\apco.est 1 F ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Community Corrections Resources Board One year terms of Edmund J. Kielty, and Mrs. Chris Pickard, Alternate, will expire August 31, 1992. 2. Grievance Panel Two year term of R. Vincent Reynolds will expire September 9, 1992. 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Four year terms of Leo Trenor, Citizen at Large, and Charlotte Lichtenstein, Neighborhood Organization, expired June 30, 1992. Mr. Trenor and Ms. Lichtenstein have served two consecutive terms and are not eligible for reappointment. 4. Industrial Development Authority Four year term of J. Richard Cranwell will expire September 26, 1992. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- T i-~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 28, 1992, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. 3. Request to Accept Grant from Virginia State Library and Archives for VLIN Online Database Service for County Library. 4. Request for Appropriation of $675 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini- Grant. 5. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 6. Approval of Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation Concerning the Reporting or Property Taxes to the Federal Government. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Spencer Watts, Director, Libraries Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools A-72892-7.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Supervisor Kohinke nominated Wayne Gauldin to complete the unexpired three-year term of Fenton E. Harrison, Jr., Catawba Magisterial District. This term will expire June 30, 1994. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board Supervisor Kohinke nominated Mikeiel T. Wimmer for another four- year term, which will expire July 31, 1998. Ms. Wimmer has been contacted and has agreed to serve. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above nominees be appointed. ~ .~ ~..-~e~J Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. ,7c~hnsc~n No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Parks & Recreation Advisory Board File Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board File ACTION NO. A-72892-7.b ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit and One- Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Penn Forest Elementary School has requested a permit to hold a raffle and one-time bingo game in Roanoke County on October 31, 1992. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. He advises that one application will cover both permits since the monies collected will be used for the same purpose. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit and One- Time Bingo Game be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. lien Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs ent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File K-z COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that. may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seq. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seq. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. ;,,The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke t'he permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: RAFFLE PERMIT L7 ay~ Name of Organization ~'~~:'. Street Address ~~'~~~ Mailing Address (check one) BINGO GAMES ~~ ~`~ ~~~ ~~~ City, State, Zip Code ~~ `~ ~~ Y~ (~ ~~ -~~ ~~ ~"~ ~~1~ ~~ ~ ~~ Purpose and Type of Organization When was the organization founded? JL~ ~~ '~. Roanoke County meeting place? ~r~~~ {~ ~ ~i`~ (~ ~' C;~ ~ ~~~- g ~ f K_ ~ Has the organization b n in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? YES ~,~- NO Federal Identification Number ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-!~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. Officers of the Organization: President: ,( ~1f ~ '> ~. ~ t ~ ~ Vice-President ~~rj(~(~ ~ t,((~(~ ~ (~ ~, ~ ~~ ;.I ~ 14~. ~E Address : ~ _ p~f l~( ~. ~,L~ Address : ~~,~~ ~ 1~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~:^~~ ~ ~.f r ~~ ~ Y ~ ~ `~ ` ~-~- Secretary : ~' , (" ,~a,t ~ ~R~/"~Treasurer • ~~ ~~ ~' ~ (~n t Address. ~,,~~ f I~t~cri~~- ~~r. ~jt:~~ Address.~~J`I'~d~ p d~t-~~y;Y~c~~~' d~~ ~~ ~~ ~- ~ <<.t Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations: Name : ~' j ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ L~YIC~,I,~l/Yr`.A~-,-., } J(~ .~~-- C,.-~ r ~~~C Home Address ~ ~~Z (7 7 t f ~l `~ ~ I ~~ ~~ r, ~f~-~.e~..a~ ~ ~t7--~ ~y' ~? I g Phone ~~ ~c~-- ~- ~} (~, Bus Phone .~. A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (~ ~~ ~-~ `~ ~C '~ .~"~ ~ f ,~ ~t ~ _~. , Specific location where Raffl or Bing¢~Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES : Date of Drawing ~ ~ i Time of Drawing ~-~.,' ,1 '~ BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To `~ Saturday From I~Qi~ To 2 K-2 State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~` ~ ~ _._ ,, ~ ~'~q l ya ., ~ .. ,~~.~.., ~~~ r .y J a \ ~" 4.l .. ., } 3 K-2 ' BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO -~ ~- Name : Rai r,4 k~:. ~~~ ~ ~-~~ ~ ~ ~' n r ~ ~~~ ~~~~ --~~- I-~ Address: l.E-'~ <~.~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1 I~`~~4 (~ 1~~. ~ ~d ~ ~,~ County ''~ \ '1 ~~_State ~~ ~~` ZIP ~ ~ (~ Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? ' ~~~` Seating capacity for each location: ~ ~ ~> Parking spaces for each location: ~ ~~ ~ ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purposeFof organizing, managing, or conducting Bingo Games or Raffles? °;f~' ~; 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such ecords are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? °~'~'° 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit a 1 records required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~' .~ 4 is to be conducted: K- 2 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of N v~bmber of each calendar year for which a permit has been issued? ~ '~' 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter 1 ter than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or Raffle thereafter unt,i ~uch report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~ ~'. 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions ~f Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? I 9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission oft ap~ual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~`~~ .~ 10. Does your orga ization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke a.~d only at such locations, r such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, e cept a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in ~n na ement, operations, or conduct of any such game or raffle? \ ~ ~~ 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual per it fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? r?'' 5 K- ~ 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who 'col tes the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 14. Has your organization attached a com 1 to ist of it membership to this application form?_~ ~'7 ~)C'i ~,' ~~~ ~ ~ n ~ ~. ~ R ~ (~ 15. Has your organization att h~d a copy of its bylaws to this application form?_ ~ (`; ~~ ~ ~~ J 16. Has the organization been declared exempt f m property taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues?~ ~'.~", If yes, state whether exemption is for real,, pe sonal property, or both and identi y,exem t pr perty. ~~ r~}) qty 17. State he specific tyke and pur~ose of the organization. '~ ~ - ~ _ -~ ~~~ r -~ ~ ~ 18 . Is this organization ihcorporated in Virginia? ~`~ (1; ~,_.a_,~.1 ~~'' If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: p. ~ ~~, t 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? '1 (If so, attach copy of registered agent.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registrat ' or~.~by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?~-1 (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Arti/~cle~y De _cri/-pptio j _ , Fair Market Value ~ -y (fir / ~~1 4 ~G'i t', ~" f / i r J ~(•' r`' ..~/' / (~~ ~t~ ~ "~~/V M1 `J ~1.~~ ~!l ~ ~ `..'1.. (,, , r, 6 ti ~~ j / c~ f !~^ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducte more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? ~(=' ~~~ 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of the Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of instant bingo supplies? ' ~~~ < b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each te, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? ~'c (These records must be retained for three.ye rs. c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo ga prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? '~~ ~` d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to, be filed, and that these rec ds must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? ,(`~.~, 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular bingo game is in progress, and only at such loc ions and at such times as are specified in this application? '~~ 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? ~ ~ 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell a~';'i stant bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?-\ 7 KZ ' 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are expected to exceed $75, 000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501C Internal Revenue Code Service? ~+~'`~ (Certificate must be attached.) 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained r be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? ~ `~ 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandis valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? ~~ ,`%. _~` a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hundred dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. gned by: P~ ~ Name itle H me Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this t ~~ day of ~~,t_~19~ in the County/City of ~D„~f~IL.~ Virginia. J My commission expires: RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513 E ~/ N tary Publi 8 R NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED K- Z The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~~ ~~~c~~ Date ~ ommissi ner of the enue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 A-72892-7.c ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a Grant by the County Library for VLIN online database service. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Public Library has been notified by the Virginia State Library and Archives that it has been awarded a $12,425 grant under Title I of the Library Services and Construction Act. This grant will allow the Library to purchase equipment and software to access the VLIN database. This new database will include the holdings records of the majority of Virginia libraries. The Library will search VLIN to fill requests for materials which are not available locally. When the equipment is not needed for this interlibrary loan function, it will be used for clerical and bibliographic tasks. FISCAL IMPACT: The State Library will provide a toll-free number for VLIN. The only anticipated ongoing cost would be the maintenance costs for the equipment which would be absorbed by the Library budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the acceptance of said grant in order to provide access to the state-wide information network. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, "V ~ ~f-rrr~/ ~5~-t~ Spen er Watts ~ Elmer C. Hodg Library Director County Administrator K-.~ f- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens ~ cc: File Spencer Watts, Library Director Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION # A-7y2892-7.d ITEM NUMBER ^~ MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: July 28, 1992 Request for an Appropriation of $675.00 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini-Grant COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The Pupil Personnel Department submitted to the Virginia Department of Education a proposed project for funding to employ teachers during the summer of 1992 to integrate transition activities into the curriculum guide for all students with disabilities. The summer curriculum revision will update current guides to include specific transition activities, finalized forms, and process activities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Board received from the department of education a mini-grant in the amount of $675.00 for the project as proposed. Teachers have been employed and are now in the process of doing the transition work. FISCAL IMPACT: None. No matching funds are involved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $675.00 to the School Grant Fund. ~~~-~~~ Eddie L. Kolb, Director of Pupil Personnel Services /~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved ( x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix X To Nickens ~ cc: File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance K-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AT 7 P.M. ON JULY 9, 1992 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR A TRANSITION PROGRAM SUPPORT MINI-GRANT WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has been awarded a transition program support mini-grant in the amount of $675.00 to employ teachers during the summer of 1992 to integrate transition activities for youth with disabilities into the curriculum guide; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded requests the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to appropriate $675.00 to the School Grant Fund for the purpose as set forth. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Charlsie S. Pafford TESTE: .- =-~~`--~ C 1 er k c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt ACTION NO. `~''-72892-~ • e ITEM NUMBER f't~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective July 1, 1992. Edgebrook Road 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road (Route 1150) SUBMITTED BY : /~ ,, , Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROV D BY: ~-c~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ~) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections r j n AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-7.f OPPOSING FEDERAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING THE REPORTING OF PROPERTY TAXES TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, a Bill has been approved by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States House of Representatives, and is currently being considered by the full House, which would require state and local governments to itemize property tax bills in order to distinguish deductible taxes from non-deductible fees; and WHEREAS, the Bill would further require that state and local governments prepare IRS 1099 forms for all taxpayers, and to mail those forms both to the taxpayers and to the Internal Revenue Services; and WHEREAS, the information is currently available to the Internal Revenue Service on a case-by-case basis during an audit of an individual taxpayer; and WHEREAS, the cost of changing computer systems to separate the information into the required categories, and the additional cost of preparing and mailing these forms would be an unnecessary, unfair and burdensome cost on each local government and its taxpayers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby strongly object to the proposed bill, introduced by Rep. William Coyne (D-Pa), and urges its representatives in Congress to work for its defeat; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be transmitted immediately to the Honorable John Warner, the Honorable Charles Robb, the Honorable Jim Olin and the Honorable Rick Boucher. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File The Honorable John Warner The Honorable Charles Robb The Honorable Jim Olin The Honorable Rick Boucher The Honorable Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Anne Marie Green, Public Information Officer ACTION # ITEM NUMBER -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation Concerning the Reporting of Property Taxes to the Federal Government COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I recommend that the County oppose this legislation. It will be costly to us and according to the National Association of Counties, may result in ,the loss of an important tax deduction to our residents. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: U.S. Representative William Coyne of Pennsylvania has recently introduced a bill which would require state and local governments to itemize property tax bills in order to distinguish deductible taxes from non-deductible fees. The bill would also require the governments to prepare 1099 forms for taxpayers, and mail them to the taxpayers and to the Internal Revenue Service. The bill has passed the House Ways and Means Committee and will be considered by the full House shortly. The National Association of Counties has contacted Roanoke County, requesting information on the costs which would be associated with this requirement. NACO believes that the proposal is a step toward repeal of the deduction for state and local real property taxes. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Treasurer is currently working on a response to NACO which would estimate the various costs. These include changing the computer system so that it can itemize the bills as required, and the cost of preparing and mailing 1099 forms to every County taxpayer and to the Federal Government. Staff anticipates that the cost would be substantial and burdensome and that the result is also likely to be burdensome to our residents. Currently, if the Internal Revenue Service is conducting an audit or has a question about a particular taxpayer, the County's records are available on a case-by-case basis and can be provided if necessary. The attached resolution has been prepared for transmission to Roanoke County's representatives in the United States Congress, stating the County's opposition to the matter and requesting that the Senators and Congressmen work towards its defeat. ! • ~_ FISCAL IMPACT: The impact of the passage of this bill is unknown at this time, but is anticipated to be substantial. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Adopt the attached resolution opposing the passage of this bill in the United States Congress. 2. Do not adopt the attached resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. ~~~~ Anne Marie Green Public Information Officer Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Kohinke Referred Johnson To Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs cc: File Kb AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION OPPOSING FEDERAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING THE REPORTING OF PROPERTY TA%ES TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, a Bill has been approved by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States House of Representatives, and is currently being considered by the full House, which would require state and local governments to itemize property tax bills in order to distinguish deductible taxes from non-deductible fees; and WHEREAS, the Bill would further require that state and local governments prepare IRS 1099 forms for all taxpayers, and to mail those forms both to the taxpayers and to the Internal Revenue Services; and WHEREAS, the information is currently available to the Internal Revenue Service on a case-by-case basis during an audit of an individual taxpayer; and WHEREAS, the cost of changing computer systems to separate the information into the required categories, and the additional cost of preparing and mailing these forms would be an unnecessary, unfair and burdensome cost on each local government and its taxpayers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby strongly object to the proposed bill, introduced by Rep. William Coyne (D-Pa), and urges its representatives in Congress to work for its defeat; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be transmitted immediately to the Honorable John Warner, the Honorable Charles Robb, the Honorable Jim Olin and the Honorable Rick Boucher. ~~' COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Beginning Balance at $4,041,917 July 1, 1992 (unaudited) Balance as of July 28, 1992 $4,041,917 Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~ of General ~ 1> Fund Expenditures 5.60 5.60$ Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25$ of General Fund expenditures ($72,151,291). ~z COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FIIND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 (unaudited) Addition to Capital Reserve from original 1992-1993 budget July 14, 1992 Lighting of Green Hill Park Ball Fields (15,OOOj, Balance as of July 28, 1992 $ 8,511 114,760 $ 108,271 Submitted by ~~ ~•~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~~ COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 $ 50,000 July 14, 1992 Information Program for Bond Referendum (18,250 Balance as of July 28, 1992 ~ 31,750 Submitted by yV~,Q,/~1Q., ~V ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER /~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - June 1992 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $ 2,981,342.10 Payroll: 6/05/92 $ 457,806.83 6/19/92 469,128.61 6/09/92 118.49 927,053.93 Total: $ 3,908,396.03 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: [.~mR.J Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Cy.~/ ~-~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~V-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: July Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir is now in its eighth month and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last month included: ° Grouting along the west and east rim ° Excavation of the dam foundation including excavation of clay seams between the rock layers ° Construction of cut-off trench ° Railroad borings for 42 inch electric and 60 inch water line casings ° Clearing of rock quarry area There is more overburden and clay material to be removed within the dam area than anticipated. While this is not a serious problem, it may require a change order. Funds are available for this in the contingency account. The contractor has requested an extension of contract time to complete the work due to time lost during the wet conditions in May. Staff has approved change order number 5 in an amount of $13,939.24. This change order was required to increase the thickness of the casing pipe used under the railroad in order to meet new railroad requirements. N-5 During the next month, the contractor will perform the following: ° Rim grouting ° Excavation of the dam foundation ° Construct cut-off trench ° Begin construction of the River Pump Station ° Install the 54 inch pipes in the stream between the railroad and the river. Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $2,755,159.98 for construction and $453,710.69 for engineering construction phase services. WATER TREATMENT PLANT The Water Treatment Plant is in the design phase. Work continues on the design of the treatment facility buildings, treatment processes, residue handling facilities, storage facilities and high service pump station. The pilot water treatment plant at the Glenvar site is operated eight hours per day, five days per week. The pilot continues to operate as expected and produces a high quality finished water. The Chairman and Staff met with the Corps of Engineers to discuss permit conditions. The Chairman suggested a tiered permit condition by which release/pump back would not be required if withdrawal were limited to times when flow was greater than 0.4 Mean Annual Flow during June through March and 0.5 Mean Annual Flow during April and May. The Corps of Engineers said they would look at such a proposal and request comments from other State and Federal Agencies. Staff will model the County water operation under the reduced withdrawal proposed to determine the resultant safe yield of the reservoir. Staff will present the results of the model and its effect on the reservoir operation after review by Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern who developed the conditions of the original permit. During the next month, the following work will be performed: ° Design will continue on the treatment plant and site plan. ° The pilot plant will be operated. ° The second river stream gauge will be completed. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work has been started and will continue on the Water Transmission Line: ° Route selection ° Title certification ° Easement negotiation ° Obtaining easements ° preparation of construction drawings ~1~-5 SUBMITTED BY: Clifford ig, P. . Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Ho e County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~- L7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Smith Gap Landfill Substantial progress has been made during the past month with the more favorable weather conditions. Both sediment control ponds are functional at this time and the entrance is nearing completion. Grading has begun in the fill areas and will continue throughout the remaining construction time. A time extension has been granted for the completion of the grading of the tipper site to August 10, 1992. This extension will not delay construction of the tipper station. Transfer Station The submittal of the final design and Part B Submittal to the Department of Waste Management has been delayed and is expected to be submitted by the end of July. Advertisement for construction bids will be placed in early August. Demolition of the existing structures by Trinity Industries will begin by July 30. The property acquisition closure has not been completed to date. The Resource Authority's legal counsel is working on final closing documents. Norfolk Southern Rail Spur Clearing for the rail spur is approximately 70% complete and grading has begun. The contractor continues to make progress. No delays are expected that will affect construction completion. N-e Smith Gap Facilities• Tipper Station The final design of the Tipper Station is being completed at this time. Advertisement for construction bids is expected in early August. The rail car dumper is being fabricated and will be ready for on site assembly by December. Construction of the building will begin in September. Attached are project updates of the status of the major waste disposal facilities in progress. Please note that construction bids for the Tipper Building are due on August 19 and for the Transfer Station on September 8. Demolition work at the Transfer Station should begin soon. Respectfully submitted: ` ~~ :. r'' z ~~ John R. Hubbard Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs N-b PROJECT STATUS SMITH GAP LANDFILL SCHEDULE 1992 1993 9(, J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C O E A E A P A U U U E C 0 E O N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T 0 E E U R C I E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R SITE CLEARING 100 ACCESS ROAD 4 TIPPER SITE 90 DRAINAGE 14 SED. POND #1 24 SED. POND #4 56 LEACH. TANK RD 0 WATER TANK RD MISCELLANEOUS 15 DISPOSAL AREAS ,...._ .................. .1 DESIGN FINANCIAL STATUS CONSTRUCTION S779,850 Contract Amount 53,068.541 -0- -0- Change Orders 5779,850 TOTAL S3,068,541 $503,175 Payments to Date S 542,864 64% Percent of Totai 1 god Olver, Inc. Contractor Thomas Bros., Inc. 7/92 N-b PROJECT STATUS ROANOKE TRANSFER 8TATION SCHEDULE 1992 1993 qb J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E O N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R DEMOLITION 10 CO NST RU CTI ON 0 FINANCIAL STATUS DESIGN CONSTRUCTION S460,000 Contract Amount _0' Change Orders 5460,000 TOTAL S 169,570 Payments to Date 36% Percent of Total Olver, Inc. Contractor 6/92 N-6 PROJECT STATUS NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAIL SPUR SCHEDULE 1992 1993 96 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R DESIGN 100 ACQUISITION 95 CLEARI NG GRA DE 0 2 TRACK CONST. 0 SPUR TO TRANS. 0 DUMPER 10 CARS 0 COVERS 0 FINANCIAL STATUS ESTIMATED COST: 59,000,000 (Design, construction, capital equipment) RVRA to pay actual costs not to exceed S9,000,000. Payments to be made in accordance with contract. Percent Complete: 15 7/92 ~r PROJECT STATUS SMITH GAP TIPPER STATION SCHEDULE 1992 1993 9f, J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C O E A E A P A U U U E C O E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R DESIGN 90 CONST. BIDS 0 CO NST RU CTI ON ..... ........ 0 DUMPER FABRIC. 10 DUMPER INSTALL 0 DESIGN (Tipper station design costs are included in FINANCU\L STATUS CONSTRUCTION the following cost schedule for the landfilq S779,850 Contract Amount ~ -0- -0- Change Orders S779,850 TOTAL -O- S 503,175 Payments to Date _0_ 64% Percent of Total _a Olver, Inc. Contractor 7/92 1 ACTION N0. ITEM NO. 0 ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Worksession to discuss proposed 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors scheduled Second Reading and action on the proposed zoning ordinance for August 25, 1992. At your First Reading on June 23, 1992 the Board requested a worksession on the ordinance. This worksession will be used to obtain information and discuss the remaining ordinance issues. The remaining issues include the June 23, 1992 comments of the Roanoke Regional Homebuilder's Association (RRHBA), and the suggested changes offered by Mr. Eddy in a memo dated July 6, 1992. I have attached copies of the RRHBA's and Mr. Eddy's comments for the Board review prior to the worksession. Several issues raised by the RRHBA continue to be of significant importance. The RRHBA continues to object to the separation of the approval processes for the zoning text and zoning map. They have requested that the text not be implemented until such time that the map is adopted. The RRHBA presented this issue to the Planning Commission prior to their five worksessions in April and May. The issue was thoroughly discussed by the Commission. The Commission concluded that the separation of the text and maps is critical to the successful implementation of the zoning ordinance, and that the short interim period between the adoption of the text and maps was a feasible and necessary approach to the implementation process. The interim period will allow the residents of Roanoke County to benefit from the flexibility contained in the new text while the maps are prepared and reviewed by the community, Commission and Board. The RRHBA has expressed concern that significant public controversy will emerge as part of the map adoption process. o-~ 2 Although some specific property interests within the County may object to the proposed maps, (including the RRHBA) the maps will be prepared using the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Plan as a guide. Historically, property owners within Roanoke County have voiced concerns over zoning map changes that did not follow the Comprehensive Plan. As our objective in this process is to implement the Plan, the staff and the Commission believe that there will be community support for most of the map changes proposed throughout the County. The Commission also discussed and concluded that the proposed interim period is a significant incentive to develop a community consensus on the proposed maps. If the implementation of the text is delayed until the adoption of the maps, Roanoke County will not have a new zoning ordinance until the maps are approved. Without the implementation of the text, there is no incentive for the community to participate and support the map adoption process. The other major issue raised by the RRHBA was the issue of average lot sizes in agricultural areas. Paul Mahoney has given you his June 23, 1992 opinion on this matter, and it need not be elaborated upon in this report. The RRHBA comments also focused on the health and safety issues associated with minimum lot sizes. Although their comments focus on the adequacy of recent health department standards, the Commission and staff approached the minimum lot size issue from the perspective of public health and safety, and from the growth management policies clearly contained in the County's Comprehensive Plan. An objective of the new ordinance is to influence the location and timing of new residential growth, regardless of the provision of public water and sewer. The staff hopes that the worksession on Tuesday will allow significant time to discuss these issues and the remaining issues that have been raised. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That a worksession on the proposed 1992 Zoning Ordinance be held on July 28, 1992. Respectfully Submitted, ~. ~ , /,_ Terrance L. Harrin on Director of Plann ng and Zoning Approved, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator o-i Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs C:1WP51 WGENDA\BR0714 ROANOKE REGIONAL ®~ ~l11LDED~ ASSOCIATION Prs»Id~nt Jkn Buds ~~~~~~~ June 23, 1992 David Vaughn Trs+asunr Bob Fetzer Ss+cntary Rk:kwr,ltn~ Mr. Terrance L. Harrington Director of Planning Imm~d. Past PrasldraM Bob Flynn COUNTY OF ROANOKE VP/Assoctat~ Post Office Box 29800 Bul Janson Roanoke, Virginia 24018 VP/R~modebrTM Rk:k Cdlns Re : PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE Directors ked Baldwin Dear Terry Jim Beavers Worth Boone Kyle cook We have enclosed a copy of RRHBA's position on the June Edc«~ 1992 proposed Draft of the Roanoke County Zoning Text AllenDeweese Dann Fec¢ell along with a Summary of Comments. y Gary Feazell Jef-y ~ We appreciate your continued interest in soliciting our K~ ~„1Ot~e views as this zoning ordinance approval process stevelyon continues. We would like the opportunity to discuss our W~nrrk summary of comments in more detail with the Board of ~• c. Peters Howiard Poage Supervisors prior to the Second Public Hearin g - David F. Radford chlps~ucs~ Earle Shumate We are leased with the ro ress made to date and are p P 9 Jonwilliarna hopeful that our remaining concerns will be recognized G°^'Yan'"e and addressed. NAHB ltls+ Directors ElbertWakdron Sincerel y Ron Wllbrd , NAHB Dkoctor: ~~ J. T. Huddleston ~~~~~Ulr Charles Simpson HBAV PastPreskieNs Richard S. Whitney, Jr. F-ank R. Radford Chairman, Zoning Task Force Maury Shauss Elbert Waldron HBAV Vk:e President RSW, JR. ~1CW lew Jamison HBAV Directors Jim Buck sin Johruon Enclosure (s ) Jock Loeb, Jr. Steve Strauss Layai Counsel David Helscher Executtva VP Melody Williams 1626 Appertlon Drive, Salem VA 24153. 703-389-7135 • Fax 703~89•d~30 Affiliated with National Association of Home Builders • Home Builders association of Virginia 4-I ROANOKE REGIONAL HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION Position on Proposed Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County The RRHBA compliments both the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission for their efforts with the monumental task of a complete rewrite of the Zoning Text. The text as currently drafted goes a long way towards addressing problem areas experienced in the past, clarifying definitions, and is written and formatted in a more user friendly document. The RRHBA, however, opposes the Zoning Ordinance as currently drafted. The first and foremost concern is the timing of the implementation of the text without the Zoning Maps. We recommend that the text be approved with certain modifications but not be implemented until such time as the map has been approved and adopted. The conversion table proposed to be used will be effective to a taking of land in many circumstances until the proposed map is adopted. Although staff has indicated a two month time frame for preparing the draft map, the final approval could take. many months before being adopted. Over 80$ of the land in Roanoke County is zoned R.E. or A-1 which currently allows 15000 SF lots without public utilities or 7200 SF lots with public utilities. The new zoning text would require all lots in these districts to have a minimum size of one acre regardless of utilities available. The new zoning map may resolve this inequity by rezoning some of these lands to the R-1 district. But the question and concern is when will the zoning map be adopted and how long will property o-~ Page 2 owners be severally impaired. If the map becomes controversial, the time frame for approval may lengthen and may further necessitate numerous rezoning petitions to be filed. It is essential that either a definite timeframe be adhered to in approving the zoning map, or that the Zoning Text be approved but not implemented until the Zoning Map is approved. The second major area of disagreement is with the methodology of the larger lot sizes in the agricultural districts. RRHBA agrees with lower densities in the agricultural districts, but we believe this can be handled with "Density Zoning". We recommend that the AG-1 District average 1.5 acres for the entire platted subdivision with no lot smaller than 1 acre; that the AR District average 1 acre per platted subdivision with no lot smaller than 20,000 SF, that the AV District be reduced to 20,000 SF. One reason given by Staff for larger lots is a concern about growth in areas where utilities do not currently exist. This is coupled with a concern for septic field failures. Prior to November of 1982, there was no formal testing of land located within platted lots of a subdivision. In some cases, the developer/owner had random tests made through percolation test holes which were not always accurate. After the lots were put on record and a building permit was to be secured, the Health Department went to the site and checked the soil for a septic tank permit. Thus prior to 1982, platted lots normally were subject to o-~ Page 3 Health Department review after "the fact" and sometimes approval of questionable soils was the outcome. In November, 1982, the Virginia Department of Health approved stricter regulations which dictated that drainfields be approved for each platted lot and all accompanying documentation be kept on record at each respective Health Department. These requirements were subject to all localities who had the Health Department sign the final plat. Roanoke County did not have this requirement so lots were still being platted without Roanoke County Health Department approval of drainfields prior to recordation. Not until July 1, 1988 did Roanoke County fully implement a policy for subdivision approval with on-site sewerage disposal and achieve coordination between the County and the Department of Health. Based on the above review procedures until 1988, the Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association feels that lot sizes are not the main reason for septic field failures but the lack of stringent standards for on-site sewerage disposal systems. Roanoke County now has a workable policy for subdivision approval with on-site sewerage disposal systems which additionally includes reserve areas for questionable soils which should help eliminate the problem of drainfield failures which cannot be done by simply increasing lot sizes. Additionally, RRHBA feels the County should be encouraging development in areas where the new water supply lines from the d-i Page 4 Spring Hollow Reservoir may be extended. With additional density for lots with either sewer or water in AR Districts, development will be encouraged to utilize County water. If this is not changed, the Board may be facing numerous rezoning requests in the future once water has been extended to these areas. The remaining comments by the RRHBA are outlined on the attached "Summary of Comments". We would respectfully request that we be allowed to discuss these items in a work session with the Board of Supervisors. We feel that many of these items can be resolved satisfactorily with a two way discussion of our concerns and recommended solutions. ROANOKE REGIONAL HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION D"'~ SUMMARY OF COMMENTS Roanoke County Zoning Text • The text and Maps should be implemented concurrently. • Change definition of Utility Services, Major to not include community water and establish specific use standards to apply. • In the AG-1 District: - Revise Frontage Requirement from 150' to 120' - Increase allowable building coverage from 10$ to 15~ - Increase allowable lot coverage from 25$ to 30~ • In the AR District: - Reduce Minimum Lot Sizes w/o sewer and water to 1 acre average size per platted subdivision - Revise Minimum Lot Sizes with sewer and water from 1 acre to 20,000 sq. ft. - Revise minimum lot size with either water or sewer to 25,000 sq. ft. - Increase allowable building coverage from 10$ to 15~ - Increase allowable lot coverage from 25~ to 30$ • In the AV District: - Reduce lot size w/o sewer and water from 1 acre to 20, 000 sq. ft. - Reduce lot size with either sewer or water, or both from 20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft. - Reduce front yard setback from 35 to 30 feet • In the R-~. District: - Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft. - Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks for main structure are used • In the R-2 District: - Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft. - Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks for main structure are used o-~ SUMMARY OF COMMENTS Page 2 • In the R-3 District: - Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft. - Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks for main structure are used • In the R-4 District: - Reduce lot size with sewer or water from 20,000 sq. ft. to 15,000 sq. ft. - Allow accessory structure height to 25' provided setbacks for main structure are used • For Townhouse developments: - Review and revise building and lot coverage requirements - Recommends changing the minimum lot size and building and lot coverage. Ext. Interior Lot Bldg. Lot Lot Size Size Coverage Coverage R-2 R-3 1800 2300 40 65 R-4 • In the Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yard provisions: - Reduce the 10$ landscaping requirement for parking areas to 5$ • For Zero Lot Line Option: - Change minimum side yard opposite the zero yard from 20 feet to 10 feet • Opposed to deleting restaurant, drive-in and fast food and convenience stores as an allowed use on property currently zoned B-2 or B-3 i r.. ~~` , •MEMO - 7/6/92 ('1 _ To: Supervisors V From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: Work Session - Zoning Ordinance After further consideration of my "laundry list" memo of 6/22/92, Jon Hartley°s response of 6/23/92, and Rick Whitney's letter to Terry Harrington dated June 23, 1992, I offer the following list of major, potentially controversial topics for discussion at the zoning ordinance work session on 7/14/92. Many of these issues stem from the position of the Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association (RR88A). Inclusion of any item in this list does not necessarily mean that I favor or oppose it, only that it is an appropriate topic for discussion: 1. Delay the effective date of the new ordinance until the revised map is prepared. The Planning Commission and staff position, and the Board's 1st reading, are based on adopting the text on S/25/92 and applying the new district requirements to the existing map as follows, until the new map is adopted: Existing Map New Text A-1 AG-1 RE p~R R-1 R-1 R-2 R-2 R-3, R-4, R-5, R-6 R-3 R-M8 R-MH B-1 C-1 B-2, B-3 C_2 M-1 I-1 M-2, M-3 I-2 2. Eliminate or modify the proposed maximum depth-to-width ratio of 5:1 for lots in AG-3 and AG-1. 3. In agricultural districts use "average" rather than "minimum" lot sizes. For comments see Paul Mahoney's memo of 23 June, 1992. 4. Reduce minimum lot sizes as follows, as proposed by the RRHBA. "N/C" denotes no change (1 acre~43,560sf):•. District Water b Text Sewer RRHBA Water Text or Sewer RRHBA No Water or Sewer Text RRHBA AR AV 1 acre 20,OOOsf 20,OOOsf 15,OOOsf 1 acre 20 OOOsf 25,OOOsf 15 OOOsf 1 acre 1 1 ac.av. R-1 7,200sf N/C , 20,OOOsf , 15,OOOsf acre 32,670sf 20,OOOsf N/C R-2,3,4 7,200sf N/C 20,OOOsf 15,OOOsf 32,670sf N/C 5. Reduce minimum lot sizes in AG-3 to less than 3 acres, and in AG-1 to less than 1.5 acres. 6. Reduce lot frontage requirement in AG-1 from 150 to 120 feet. ii C ~' ~ ~ i 7. Increase allowable building coverage from 108 to 158, and allowable lot coverage from 258 to 308, in districts AG-1 and AR. 8. In districts R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 change the maximum allowable height of accessory structures from 15 feet to 25 feet if the same setbacks are observed as for the main structure. 9. Change the minimum lot sizes and maximum coverages for townhouses, as follows: Interior Lots (sf) Zone ---- Text ----- RRHBA R-2 - - 2000 ------ 2000 R-3 2000 1800 R-4 1600 1600 End Lots (sf) Text RRHBA 2500 2500 2500 2300 2500 2100 Bldg. Coverage Text RRHBA 308 358 358 408 358 458 Lot Coverage Text RRHBA 508 60$ 608 658 75$ 708 10. Allow R-4 buildings to be taller than 45 feet (or 60 feet if side and rear yards are increased). 11. Reduce landscaping requirements in large parking lots from 108 to 58. 12. In one agricultural zone (AG-3 or AG-4) prohibit all uses other than bona fide farming, forestry or recreation, as a way to guard the County's steep and remote lands against incompatible or uneconomic development. 13. Change private kennels in R-1 from a permission by right (1 acre minimum) to a special use permit. copy: Elmer Hodge, Paul Mahoney, Terry Harrington 4 ~; o-~ MEMO - 7/6/92 :_.Toi Terry Sarringtoo From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: Minor Modif cat ons - Zoning Ordinance As a result of my memo of 6/22/92 and Jon Hartley's response of 6/23/92, I would like to see the following minor revisions made to the draft of the proposed zoning ordinance dated June, 1992. Page Section Change ---- --------- -------------------------------------------------- 5 10(A)3 Include forestry operations as an exception. 14 21(B),(C) Allow the Administrator discretion to permit additional time for "structural" corrections. 34 29-1 WAYSIDE STAND: Allow for sale of goods produced on nearby property. 49 32-3(B)l.a Allow an exception for alterations or expansions to existing structures. Same for AG-1 & AR. 145 85-8(A)4 Allow bed & breakfast quests to stay 30 nights. 146 85-9(A)10 Same for campgrounds. 170 91-2(A)1 Allow a screened storage area for boats and recreational vehicles in multi-family projects. 204 94(A) Delete the 2nd line of the introductory sentence. Respond to complaints in residential areas. Please call with any questions. copy: Supervisors, Elmer Aodge AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-8 CERTIFYING E7CECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an. executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the certification resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: cc: File Executive Session Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation by Virginia Amateur Sports COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Amateur Sports, sponsor of the Commonwealth Games of Virginia, has asked to make a presentation to the Board. Mr. Peter R. Lampman, Associate Director, and Mr. Kenneth C. King, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors, will present an appreciation plaque to the County of Roanoke for their support of the 1992 Commonwealth Games of Virginia. They will also recognize Ms. Marcia Patton, Parks and Recreation Department, for the major role she played in the success of the Games. Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-9 APPROVING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE FUNDING OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SI%-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 28, 1992, to receive comments on the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93; and WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 as set out on the attached construction program allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: mary x. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Adoption of the Funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-1993 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~,,~~,~%~~ -~~ ~~ t~ ~~~~~~~ . BACKGROUND In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Supervisors is required to conduct a public hearing on the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan to receive public comments. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION On March 24, 1992, the Board of Supervisors approved the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for 1992-1998 based upon an estimated allocation each year of $2,233,846. Since then, VDOT has revised our final allocation to $2,227,720, a reduction of $6,126 for fiscal year 1992-93. Enclosed is a copy of the final allocation of construction funds and summary of changes for your review. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Conducting the public hearing involves no expenditures of County funds. s-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the public hearing and adopt the funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-93. TTED BY; APPROVED BY: r Arnold Cove , Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineeri g & I spections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens pc: Virginia Department of Transportation S-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE FUNDING OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 28, 1992, to receive comments on the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93; and WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 as set out on the attached construction program allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 by the Clerk to the Board. S-1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FY 1992-93 I. COUNTY - WIDE CONSTRUCTION - Items include culvert pipe, ditching, patching, safety improvements and Rural Addition. -Reduced from $250,000 to $206,386; however, rural addition allocations increased from approximately $80,000 to $111,386. -No other changes have been made under this section. II. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION - Items include: Plant mix and minor safety improvements. - Mayfield Drive has recently been plant mixed using maintenance funds, and replaced with North Barrens Road (from Bell Haven to Barrens Road); and Upland Game Road (from Falcon Ridge to cul-de-sac) to be plant mixed. - No other changes have been made from priority ,#1 to #19. III. NUMBERED PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION: Items include major reconstruction or improvements and unpaved roads. - Four projects completed this past year were not completely funded or exceeded the original estimate. They are as follows: S-I PRIORITY # ROAD DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL FUNDING 20 Boones Chapel Road Unpaved Road $ 43,080.00 21 Willow Branch Road Unpaved Road $ 64,060.00 22 Barrens Road Reconstruction $ 61,600.00 23 Starkey Road Reconstruction $100,000.00 Total $268,740.00 - With the addition of the four projects above, a number of adjustments had to be made in our original estimated plan for FY 1992-93. Several projects had funding reduced: PRIORITY # ROAD 25 West River Road 30 Cresthill Drive 32 Glade Creek Road 36 Cove Road 37 Timberview Road 38 Cox Hopkins Road FUNDING DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS ACTUAL Reconstruction $ 90, 000 $ 50,000 Bridge Replacement 205, 000 190,000 Reconstruction 170, 000 ]50,000 Drainage 30, 000 29,879 Reconstruction 56, 500 50,000 unpaved 125,000 74,403 2 ~'- -TWO PROJECTS RECEIVED ADDITIONAL FUNDING: FUNDING PRIORITY # ROAD DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS ACTUAL 29 Cresthill Drive Approaches to Bridge $ 45,000 $ 50,000 35 Colonial Avenue Curve Improvements 5,000 25,000 -With all the changes made only one project (Patterson Drive) was not funded (unpaved Road). 3 rn 0 1 v m N a s N a .n O~+ U O+ N ~ M O O VJ O c'f O 1-I .-1 U A W _ _ F O O N W ti m to x .. ., rn 1 N 01 01 .-1 ti ~ S a bl z F w F 2 z a o a ~ v I" t Z r1 > ~e £W a O F F 2 W N O ?C O ~ U Ww£+ a r/°~ 2 F Q y O a Z N O W W U A V1 A N 01 O M t0 O I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 7 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 1 I I I 1 1 U I I I I 1 I I q I 1 I 1 1 I 1 3r 1 1 I I a ~ ~ U i i i ~ N i W i 0 i N i q I I m 1 db 1 O 1 m 1 m I l a l u l u l u l u l u l 1 1 -. I Le I 1r I 1. I L. 1 I 1 O I O I O I O I O I I I I I W 1 t4 I I 4. 1 I 1 k~ 1 W I 1 1 d 1 d 1 q 1 1 d 1 I d I 1 1 ~ I ~ 1 N I V 1 a+ 1 1 I q I q I q I q 1 q I 1 1 i.l I / I J3 I N I i~ 1 I I I 1 I 1 I to I Vj 1 1 1 I N 1 I I 1 I y 1 I 1 IQ 1 I 1 I ! I I I I I I I I I I I O I 1p I O I O I O I 1 i O i CD 1 O 1 O 1 VT 1 I O 1 ~ 1 M I O I ~ 1 I I M I IA 1 .y 1 O I O 1 I I F 1 f•1 I .y I IA I .-1 1 I 1 v I 0 I 1 1 ~ I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I r ' 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I i I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I OI I I 1 1 1 1 I C 1 I i I I I I ~.1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 -. 1 I 1 1 I I 1 m I 1 1 1 I 1 1 d I I i i I i ~ i m I ~ O i U i i i C i OI i > i i W c F i i ~. i I LL 1 L. I I 1 T I 'O 1 I w 1 m I ~ I I 1. 1 ® I I U 1 y I 1 I C 1 N 1 I I A I 1 I ~~ I 1 I I N 1 1 C I H I 'O I I Q I YI 1 I O I ~.I 1 C 1 W ~ q 1 p~ i c i i + i m i I I CA I O 1 q 1 1. I C 1 I I 1 +1 1 .d 1 W I O I 1 I 'O I a.~ I .d 1 I -a 1 1 I C 1 +~I I q 1 'p 1 Y 1 1 1 q I '® 1 1 Y C I q I U i < i qq tl i q i -.N+ 1 I -.i I I N 1 ,~. i N 1 1 I W 1 ~-1 1 I d 1 ~.i 1 I I W 1 q I o 1 ~ 1 i+ 1 I 1 q I 3. 1 8 I w I w 1 I 1 {. 1 ~ I ,~1 1 7 I m 1 1 1 F 1 a I p. I N 1 (a 1 1 I 1- I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 i I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I F i 1 C7 I I 1 1 I i I 1 1 I I I Z 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 I I 1 W . 7 I 1 1 1 I I 1- I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I O I 1 1 1 I F£ i £ .~ i M i a i In i to I I U O 1 O I O I O I O I W F f 10 I t0 1 10 1 10 1 10 I '7 f'I I to 1 In I I[I 1 to I In a p , i i 1 i I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1- I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 W 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I i I M O I IlI I N I ~ I "J 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 .-1 I .-1 I to l o l o l o l o l o l l a I to I f0 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 CD I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I t0 O 1`7 t0 O N la I I F N IF 1 IW f i o la 16~ 1 -1 q 1 M I ~ I F ~U I M rn O m Yl m a < N a cn M rn U o+ eti ~ N O ~ tF/l O M O ~+ N W U q ~ O N W h O t0 S ._. ... vi N 01 01 .-1 H m ~ C GI h 8 ~ a W O < s P° z a o M O h+ a lpa/~I gg U O F F Z f+l. IA O OC O ~ U 13 F W ~ ~ ~ o O W W U q y q N 01 O C7 10 O 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 Z I I 1 O I 1 I H I I 1 F I 1 1 U 1 I 1 D 1 X i tF/)F 1 ~ i OW ~ I £' 1 Uh I a i ..7 a I 1 < I I F I 1 I Z I I 1 W I I I q 1 U ~ 1 1 Z I 1 1 ~+ I 1 1 I I I I i -- 1 I 1 1 I I I O I Z I rn I 1 O I I 1 M I ll) I 1 < 1 ~ I 1 I I 1 i ~ 1 I I ~7 1 i I < 1 i I I i I 1 i I i I I I I 1 1 1 I O I H I F 1 F 2U UO ~a i F 1 z 1 q I N I 2 1 ra 1 O N F H ZU UO Fa Z W q U Z N O M F U O F ZU UO ZFa Q M U Z N Z I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I O I 1 O F I M 1 1 I F I I ~ I U 1 I I O I 1 a I a 1 1 ZU 1 ZU I 1 U i UO ii O W i < a i O . 1 F I I ~ i W q I A I I N I H 1 I I U I I y 1 Z I I N 1 M I I I 1 1 O I O 1 O 1 O I O 11 0 O 1 O 1 O 1 O I O 1 1 0 O I O I I O 1 1 O I I O I 101 I I I V~ 1 !n I M 1 O 1 O I l r ti 1 f/1 I N I ~ 1 In I l r ~ I I ~ 1 ~ I N I I H 1 I 1 I 1 1~ I I I 1 1 I I O I I 1 1 1 O I 1 O 1 1 I o 1 o I o I o I o 1 1 o I o I o 1 0 1 o I o 1 1 O 1 O I O 1 co 1 O I to I '1 01 1 VI I IA 1 N I O I i i N i I 1 1 I ~ 1 I I I i wn I I I I i 1 I 1 1 N 1 I I 1 +? 1 1 I I 1 I I I N 1 1 1 I Z 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 0 1 1 1 I 1 1 I M 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ~+ I Q, 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I M I I 1 1 1 I l a I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I ~} v 1 I .+ I q I 1 II 1 I II 1 I 1 II I 1 II I ti r1 1 QI T 11 I .'1 I c+f M I I Y I ~+ I V I N 1 F 1 a I I N I N I N I Yl I F F Yn I F b 1 I U o 1 0 1 0 l U o laa o l a o I 1 < U I U I U I < U 1 U 1 U 1 I y I 1 1 U 1 yN 1 3 1 I I k 9 1 m X'O 110 X 9 1 IA 1 !C 'Q I X q I '?C ~ I I W M dl I O M m 1 C~ r .. CI 1 In W M ~ I H M M W 1 .•1 M M I 17 g E ~+ I VO E+~ ~ 14001E a~+ 1 tAgE / 1 EEE F 1 .-IEE a+ qq I S E . ]E + F~~•.Bi i FF[y[y'rr~ i FFZ 6 i F~ H i M~2 1 + i F~Z B I I aU<a+ .... y I aa«+ .... r~~ fNA 1 aa< .... M Vy1 1 aU~ .... rrr111 i ++ I In 10< .... i F I aN< .... Fa i N Sa.FaW i l+.FW W i GI.Fa W k.FO. k.FW t..FO. 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 M I 1 I M 1 I I M I I I H 1 I I M I I I 1 i E I E 1 E I E 1 E I w I CL' 1 I 1 1 I 1 E I F 1 ti 1 01 1 r 1 10 I O I I O 1 .•1 I ti I .••1 I 1n 1 in I O 1 7[~y I wd I 11....77 1 1 I 1 I O 1 1 I I I I O 1 1 1 1 1 1 O I 1 1 1 I 1 O i 1 I 1 I I ti I 1 I 1 I I N I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 I IFFY i i i i W F i .~ i N th a ~ co I hH I O I O I O 1 O 1 O I O I O I O I O 1 O 1 O 1 O I O l a I to I IA I <n 1 In I In I IA I pl I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 10 1 r 1 N 1 t0 I N I p I I O 1 O 1 Cf I 1'~ I N I N 1 I O I O 1 m I 01 1 1D I 10 I 1 .-1 1 e•1 1 rl 1 N 1 O 1 O U q 1 i a I I I 1 1 N M ~ Ip I 1 W .•1 I W 1 1 W I A U1 1 W t 7 i ~ ( ~ ~ i O } i •a } i ~ ~ i R~ ~ i a ~ (~ I 'J I N `~ I N 1 I (0 1 3 ~ 1 1 0 1 Ica F I ra ~ 1 NVJ ~ I t0 ~ 1 < F 1 F l a I I O¢pq~ I OFl M I O(~ a l OW M I P'1Z a l 00 1'+ a I M 1 01 H a I N S 1 NIA M a 1 V'W' I NO N a I 1 i '•1 1 O O I ey M 1 O O I H fYi N 1 (~ O N I .-I 1 O N 1 10 ~ 1 O H I 1D ~ I O M i aN 1 a < a 0. I a5 W 1 a W i a I aN a O 0 M RJ Z a e O H I I 1 1 I 1 I i i I rn I m N m a N I a rn F ~ p+ r ~ • ~ F O O D Iq M O 1-1 f`7 U q W ti m ~ S ~. ._. VI 1 N 01 01 .-1 eel >~ ~C J C GI ti a ~ W 2 C9 F ~ z a o > ~ F b. F ~ Ul F O ~ U N O WW P~ 3 V1 a U q V1 A N I 1 I 1 Of I 1 1 1 \ 1 t I 1 ~ I 1 O 1 O I O ~O I I H I ~+ t H O I I [-~ I F 1 F i ~ i ~ O i F i F to F 1 I X 1 NF 1 to F 1 NF la 1 2U , 1 2U 1 2U I< 1 OW I OW I OW £ I U I UO i UO W O is s i ~a i sa i a I I F 1 F I F I 1 W 1 W I W I I q I q I q I 1 M 1 M I H 2 i y 2 I I 1 4d 1 N 1 M 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I O 1 I O 1 I O 1 1 O I O 1 O 1 2 1 .y 1 to I O I O I - I I ap i ~ ~ F i N i +/A 1 < I I 1 I U I t I I I 1 1 < 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 o I I I I o 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 o I o 1 0 1 1 .-~ I IA I O I '1 IA I m 1 r ~ i ~ i ~ I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I O 1 1 1 I M I I 1 1 F I 1 0~ I 1 I I I I M 1 1 I l a I I 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I q I 1 I II I II 1 1 II I I 1 ~ 1 Y 1 J+ y v 1 1 x v l x ' I to l x v 1 1 •-/0 1-1 O ~ 1 0 M I r W .l m 1 I OD aDE N 1 mV'E a+ I ODgE~+ i ~° 0D F = 1 ao N q 1 .~. 1 b I I FF2 ++ i FF~ ++ i F7~ ~ aa~ .y+ ~ as +y+ i aUav I I wFa I I W 1 wFa W I 1 t,wFal~ I 1 1 1 - I I 1 1 I 1 1 E i E i E Z i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ 14] I O 1 O 1 O 1 .1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I - 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I s 1 1 I 1 1 0 I I 1 w ~+ i r i ap i rn ~ I O 1 O 1 O I O l a 1 1A I 1n I <n l a I I 1 1 1 1 1 i I IA N 1 O 1 I 10 I 10 I 01 I 1 O I I 1 O I N I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I a 1 I O I I .~ I I I r l CD I ra OI 1 .+ I .r I I 1 I 1 U I I 1 W a ~i a } x ;i ~ i q i 0 1 3 ~ i 3 a F i r0 ~ i ao.7 ~ i ap,Z7 l a 1 .-~ W H I .-1 W M 1 O M I O M 1 O H I I I In .. al In.+ al rn ~ a l rn al O+W at I 1 ~o> of ~o> of .. 0 1 ~ of ..> of 1 1 H I M I M 1 O H 1 O M 1 a~ ai a~ ai a~ a i au ai au e a I I I I O I O 0-1 I N p~ i ~ [. i F ZU i 2U Uh i Uh a°a i a°a Fa i Fn' W i W A I q H 1 rl 2 1 2 H 1 M 1 I O I O 1 O 1 1 O 1 1 ~ I O 1 V? I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I V? i I I O 1 .-1 1 N I H i 1 1 1 1 I o 1 I I I f ~ I I I 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I ~ 1 O I 1 1 I 1 ~ I ~ 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I II I I I I II I I 1 V I V I ~ V N i y Igo lx a Itolx v I IrW.+ m Irw.. m I 1 ttD q E ~+ I CD A E ~+ I 1 .y 1 d 1 I Itl 1 z ' { i av~ ' ' av W + y + a a + 1yA (•.F I I W i IaFO . 1 I W I I 1 E I I ~ I O I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I o 1 .i 1 O 1 ~ I 1 i o 1 01 1 rl !F 1 O 1 y 10 I ~ME+ I U IF 12 IU I 1 1 IF I 1 Iq i M z I M 1 I I 1 M 1 I I E 1 I I 1 t I O 1 1 O iip 1 I 1 F 1 1 I ti O m O OI .~ e 0 m O VI ~- u'1 rn m v 9 • ^ a • OG s N I M 0~1 U 01 H a w O ~ IFA O M O ~+ V• U A W ~ W Z ti OOD IND S 1 N N ~+ 01 H ti m ~ ~ O C QI a 41 F o'0 H F 2 z a o a ~ v > s a W F ~ V O W IFA O S O y U > O 3 < O W O W U A VI A 1 I N I 1 01 I 1 \ 1 1 O 1 1 M 1 I \ I I 10 1 1 0 1 I I I 1 I I 1 la I 1 4 1 I E I 11~ I la I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I t ,._- I I I i I 1 I 1 Z 1 1 O I ~F i 1 nC I 1 U I 1 o I 1 t I I 1 I 1 I - I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 .1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I z I 10 i 1 M 1 I F I I Q~ 1 I M 1 la 1 I U 1 I N 1 1 W 1 I I I I O I O HI 1 F•I U i U F i F 2U ~ 2U U i U O O a a i as • s $ I Z A I q M I M Z I Z M 1 1 H O O O Q N 0 0 0 v 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I O i O i O U i { i U U a i a i a F i i N I /1F F NF ow i ow i ow UO i UO i U O a a i ` a i s • a • e a Z 1 2 1 Z W A 1 A I A H 1 H 1 M Z I Z 1 Z F-0 I I I N I I I M 1 O 1 O i O 1 O O O i O 1 1 I I i I O 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 (/1 I 1 N 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 ° i o i o ~ o o 1 01 I In I ti 1 c+f VJ• i V- i L? i y 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I N N 1 1 I I Om I A 1 II 1 II I II 1 II I m0 II I N 1 b i .+ i CA 1 v i v % 1 {~ i F F F~ 1 a ++ V I 1 1 X 0 1 1 O I 0 I O a I > 1 1 0 I I 1 0 U 1 U I U I U 1 ZZO U 1 2 i • saox~ i aorx rrnx C ~ i CDx'C i ..Na V I 1 1 0 01-1 1 a01EN 1 0 0 ~+ 10101£ d I O V' 1••I N 101tDE I N to H m V I OM£4+ 1£ E£ 1 H Q1 1 i+ I d ~ 1 .•1 •r d 1 .-I .•1 b I P .r b I~ 1l7 Q I .7 F a 1 F ^ 1 8 I F 6 1 00 W B I I I UFZ+1 I FFZ .~ I FF .~ I FFZ••+ I •> ~.I I za~.+ ~ aaa +~ i as ~ a+ i aaa+~ °~ ~ ~ oo~ +~ ~ i i wFar~ ~ ~.Fa a ~ a.Fa r ~ r~Fa ~ 6.FU t~ I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I ~ 1 1 I 1 1 M 1 1 M 1 I N I I N 1 1 N 1 I 1 1 1 £ I £ I E 1 £ I E 1 ~ 1 I ~ 1 N 1 tp I 117 1 O 1 1 (9 I O I H 1 O 1 .1 1 '•1 I I Z 1 1 1 I 1 1 i f+] 1 ~..1 1 1 1 I 1 O 1 1 1 I I 1 O 1 I I I I O 1 1 1 1 I 1 O I 1 1 1 1 O I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 l a I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I UW 1 1 1 I bI F 1 N I f•'1 1 ~ I llI I 10 I I h H 1 N 1 •-1 1 N I .-1 I N I 1 0 1 O 1 O I O I O I O 1 l a I an I 1A 1 in I In 1 In 1 l a I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 10 I 10 1 t0 I F I 01 1 1 1 r I r I r 1 s 1 OJ 1 I 1 O I O 1 ~ I N 1 t0 I I 1 - I ti 1 1 H 1 ti 1 I .•~ 1 O I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 N 1 P') 1 V1 In A 10 1 1 I .+ 1 .+ I .~ 1 ti t a .-1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I ~ i { i i ~ ~ i { i A x 0 a • a A a ? . A > • p A O 8 i IoA > i In F i Io F i r ~ i l a 1 r •~ M I r •~ M I r •{' M I .-1 O M 1 01 a N 1 I I ao a a l a0 a a l ao a a l In a l r>p a 1 1 I .+ a 6 o l .r pG o f .•+ pG 1 W o f .+ ~ 0 1 101A 0 1 1 t I 1 I F 1-I M a I 1 F ~+ M a l F ~+ M I a l F H I a a l F •t I-11 a l act a ~ aln a l am a l a a l ax a l O O Q r N F 1 y t 10 I M IF IU I ~ IU is IF q 1 w z t N i 1 1 1 1 a 1 F a s 0 O y ~'' rn 1 d 'O m q m a N a M ~ C) ~ .-1 ~ fi F a w O ~ VI O rl O ~+ In U q W W ~ O N W h CD ~ S I N Ol 01 ti ., ~ ~+ ~t ~ C m ., g ., a ai O F Iq z a o a ~ v > < a 1.. F ~ VFJ 7C O EEEN+++ U 2 ~ A N E p<p,, Z a O W W W U q N q N 01 O 10 O I 1 i 1 I I I I I 1 t I I I I 1 Q 1 Q I I H I M 1 I [+ I F i ~ D i W ~ i F 6 i OW i 1 OW UO i U O is i s w i 4a 1 I [-~ I F W I 1 W 1 I 1 q 1 q I 1 H 1 H I 1 U 1 Z I I Z I I I 1 1 I M I H 1 1 I I I 1 I I O I I Q I I O 1 O I Z I O 1 O I O 1 I N i F 1 N ~ i ~ i N U U 1 O 1 i a . 7 14 I 1 1 I I I -- I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 0 I I I 1 0 I I o 1 0 1 I o 1 0 I ' I IO I O I 1 1 1 N I N 1 1 I 1 ~ I 1 ~ 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I i 1 1 1 1 i 1 0 I H 1 1 I F I Q~ I I 1 I 1 H I I Ia I I 1 1 ~ I 1 I 1o I rr i ~ q Z a ir~FII £ F W ~ p G W I O W U i aay££W ~N Z i my>U 1 I a I 1 IOHa v IHHab 1 110£E ® I x£aal 1 110 H }+ 1 EN ~ H I 1 OW 6 I/'1tO R 1 1 I F • > 1 aoa •.i v I .~ l oo~++ 1 i O y 1 1 ~ WFU 1 W i f..F VIW 1 1 - I I I 1 1 H I I H x i £ i £ I F 1 M 1 01 1 Q I O I .~ 1 1 o 1 a i I 1 I i I I I i o 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 i I 1 I I 0 I 1 W~i 1 ~ i t0 I h H I .-~ 1 H a i o i o l n u i I d 1 1 I I I I T 1 01 ~ i ~ I _O __ I O I I O I O I ~ i ~ 1 10 1 ~ i i 1 I I I I 0 1 0 I ~ 1 ti 1 10 I N I C7 (Q I Z I H 1 q I M 1 3 W> 1 M O I aU rw Z N C~ 11 I UWv OK~U I wo ~ -+Q~a°m I ti(,~Ev IM2H~ I FOF-+ I a E ~ +py~1 WFtnW 1 1 10 I CD I M I Ir ~~ I i i F Z O U a 4 OQ U OH M ~i o~ ZH UWq ~3 wz QO 2U H E r rn O I v N 10 O i 1 I IF I IF i a oF0 D 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 r I .-1 I q a CO I .-~ 1 e0.1 ~ 1 °a i y rn 3 ~ H i ~ o+ p30t ~ rri I a s ~ I .F.1 I I 1 I I 1 ao~ ~o a l o f i r~o 1n as 4 a 1 o 1 NO ~ 3 a l o f M 1 1 1 I I FO as a a l F ax a i a I FW az a I a 1 1 1 I I 1 O I H 1 F j I F OW 1 UO 1 as 1 <a 2 1 W 1 q 1 H 1 2 I H 1 ~~~ n rn m I a v m M m a s N a rn U ~ Nr H w Z F O rOi O 1~+ ~ W U A ~ ~ ~ 1 N O1 01 .A m a o e a c m ~ °o '~ a r~ W O F (A < < z a o H O M H z '•,~ ~ ~ F O w ~ O ~C O y U F~ WE~ a y° £Z F A .] E p<, U F O W W W v A a A N I I I 1 1 01 I 1 1 \ i 1 I O 1 1 I M 1 I I \ I 1 I 10 I 1 1 O I 1 I 1 1 I i a I W U W Z 1 < I O 6 I O < E i a ~ i a ~ W a • l a 1 .~ 1 .. w w 1 1 W I W ~ . W U i i U ~ U A ~ U O 10 F 1 UUt O la la I < i I 1 1 O m O M N O 10 O a t0 t? C7 Z H O < a z~ a A &~. w F a :: O W U A O O 10 .--1 V? I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I Or I 00 I ON I OM I 00 1 Oln I Old I OOt I r01 I t•'t .-1 1 10r 1 oNo I .-1 .-1p I N'+O 1 Into I ~~~ 1 ~~~ I ~~~ 1 I 1 1 1 0 1 I M I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I M I 1 II 1 I II I II l a I 1 1 U I O i C 1 (/ 1/jj O i O I W 1 I A I -.1 I II ~+ 1 -.i 1 11/ I II +~ NOU! v~un! NOu I I I I O.-1 1 U •-1 I 0.-1 N I U rI V I O.-1 U rl I I < C I < C I < C I i 0 0 y I d 0 m f~ 6 a , pl (a 6 . U' I W U ti Z I oa. <4 H I A w I I F I .W-1 U P~ r+ 1 O W U A I O O O O O o r~ T •-1 fh O aoro 1 I 1 1 I 1 I Z 1 A I W I $ I 0 1 w 1 U 1 z ~ U 1 I I ~ I r 1 N 1 I N 1 M 1 .-1 1 N I ~l lnN I '+N1°) I (~ 1 1 N I 1 W ii 1 I Z 1 I O I I M I I U ii a ii O 1 I U I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I O 1 I Q O 1 1 .+ O 1 I O 1 1 to I 110 N I I O I I ~ I I ~ O'+rn 1 I 0001 I 1 00+0 1 I rlo I rIN 1 rroo I 1010~ l ooa+ I l a OlO I I < f•) C') i .y In ti ' t'I f'1 I 1 0 V!V}V? 1 N(AN I LlVPi? I I F I I I 1 ~ I 1 I I O I 1 1 1 I I VJ 1 1 I 1 I I F I 1 I I U 1 1 I I W I I I I h I 1 I I O 1 1 I l a I 1 I I I l a 1 I 11 I II i II I I Z 1 1 1 1 0 O i O i C 1 1 F-1 .~ ~ i i ~.1 I -.~ I .-+ - U n ++ I r u a+ I u a+ I I D N i U F i U p U 1 N OZ v p p K Z a+u uu i iF N O I O 111 0 1 O W O I I N 0 -+ VI I r F ~ + 0 •~ b 1 IA ~+ y 0 -+ 1 1 Z (( ++ N UtZ 1 a U C i U U ' C 1 O U t-1 < <C 1 I U '0 J I 2 0 m01 IF a 'Q 7 1 E 01 O mv wl va '0 11 ~ mN6.1 Iq 1 1 a+ 1 a+ I a+ I M~ I a .. F a+ I O lO F a+ 1 I W 1 I I 1 a B oml -'1 i. l eoml H ~'1 >. I eoml 8 '.+ 1• 1 a 8 oWl EVI -~ a I F Z oomll~ m p 1 • B'~ 1 oml lp I 1 .1 >>I .~>71 -N>71 -.1 > IZOO .. F Z 6 -•~>710a0 -~ -•1 4 1 I W >71 1f0 1 I r mvl a ~+ma+l ~ mi+l N m 1~1NU 1 ~ +mN1 ..U N mV11E i l g W wS~ i y t 1au0 i V 1 G1a i 0 y a i ..0a 0 1 i a"F'a a 0 ~ a ~ i i z 1 1 I . • I 6 1. I tl t 1 r.J 6 a t w 1 1 I 1- I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M I 1 I I I I I 1 I I H E 1 I H 1 E I w £ 1 I ~ ~ E I ~ E Ila 1 1< I x 1 I F I O I I 1 O I N I I N 10 I 1 O ; I M 11 0 1 (9 I I I c'1 1 1 M 1 • I N I 1 0 I N 1 M I I F I I 1 O 1 H I O 1 O 1 1 O I 1 O I l q 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I to 1 1 1 1 1 t I -- I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 11 1 1 I 1 '-1 O 1 1 e-1 I O I .r O I I .-1 1 .r I O I .+ 1 O I I I I 1 1 l a 1 In Z I 1 In 1 Z I to U I I O 10 I In I U I In 1 U I I 1 1 1 0 I I 1 I F£ I ~? N 1 I I 1 ~ I M I ~ 10 01 t 1 1 I In .-1 1 1 M I 01 I 1 .-1 1 O I I I I I I I UW I I WF I a 1 I I a 1 1 I ti 1 1 I N I I .y 1 ~I 1 '] H I O 1 O 1 O I O 1 I 1 O I I O 1 I 1 1 1 0 I m I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 l a 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 0 l a I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I •! 1 r 1 N I a 1 In 1 01 1 1 I 1 •-1 1 r 1 M I O I O 1 df 1 1 I I t0 1 10 1 O 1 OI I tD I 1D I I 1 I 1 1 O I I O I I .-1 t 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 1 I I A I a 1 I I I 11 I I 1 1 1 1 a I O I 1 x .-1 1 I N I I M I 1 V I A 1 1 I 1 N I U N I N I N I a N I a tnI I I I I~ 1 I 1 (11 < ' ~ I ; 1 1 Z 1 < ; 1 a O I A a M i ; 1 I A a 1 A ; I 1 Z O I ; I a 1 W N I I 1 1 ; 1 1 1 I~ 1 O I '-1 i • 10 1D U I 1 r CI .r >• I N V1 r F 1 f") N V V I O >• 1 001 >• I > N 11 ~ la 110 ~ /'7 N1r 3 rf N10 J In 1 y <0'1 F 1 a MIO >• (O W r F 1 Iff .-I In 1-+10 Nr Vj (r I Of r+.-1 .-+ ~/j <' NIMa 04 + I 1 1 1 W w a 1 1c o w a l .~ W w a l rn x a 1 1n ~ 1 ' w a l 1o to w H1 I a l l gza °i ~ ; of ZA H I ~ ; ZA of M I ~ ; VIA of A ; N I Z ••A of Z M I VV~~ 1 I Of+ a l rOr a l O.+ a l F<Ir a l <U1-1 O a l WUQO a i I Riza a 1 3za a 1 Gaza a l Vlwa a l mFa z a 1 3Faz a l l ,~ v"' 00 01 m 1 v 9 N .~ m a N a ti M O'1 '.~ H 01 O ~ N O t'1 O H F W U Ca Z -- -- ~ COO tN0 I N rn a+ .-t ~+ ~C h b ~ O E a VI ~a z ~ 4 < ~ z a o N ~ H a+ rn ~ > ~ a Wg F O W N 7C O >• U 3~ >• NO 2 R ~7 O p4p,~ O ~K(...I1 O W W W U Ca VI A 1 N 1 01 1 \ I O I M I \ 1 l0 1 O 1 I i 1 I la I I 1 I 1 I i 1 t i - 1 O I M 1 I ~ 1 I (~ I I o 1 1 ~] 1 1 a 1 I •f. I O a a 1 1 i I 1 1 1 i I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 U• I I 1 (7 I I I I (~ 1 I I I U' 1 Z 1 2 I Z 1 Z 1 Z M I M 1 M i M 1 H Z 1 2 I 2 I 2 I z Ir I 1 W 1 I Ir 1 ~ 1 1r z I z 1 1 z 1 1 z 1 z O F i F i F i H i I U U I I U U 1 F U F i h i F i F i F 1 ~ I h I ~ I y U I U i U I U 1 I I i 1 I I I I i 1 I I U CD O rn M H Inrw I rnaoo I 10.11(1 I Mr1o I oven 1 f`NQ 1 ~~~ 1 O I N I O I O 1 I 1 O 1 1~ 1 O 1 .~ I 10 1 IA I O1 ~ I ~ 1 ~ I ti °o°o°o c~'IN~ v}vfv) 1 u l u l I I 1 I O 1 M O I M 1 +~ 1 e-1 -.I I ti 1 u a+ 1 1o n a+ 1 10 on~11 is oNOu is I ONUUf, (~(~'' I N V U~~ j N I V~CDOQ 7 1 H 'J j) 7 I H 11o1oamu~wlE am~b.lE ~~tFAOOmiIn VI1~'EOmi1n 1 aao -.» 1 o-.» 1 I Ua+ma~ 10 U++m++ 10 wiral~aa~, i a, ar°>~aw i a -~- 1 E 1 1 I 1 1 (~ I z 1 Q I ~ 1 I., I z I O I M I a Z I U O 0 O O W N I 1 m I N I I tp I N I I t/) I t/} 1 1 I I I 1 1 N I I 1 1 I ~ 11~ I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I O I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 O N N I ,Y, O O O I 000 1 000 1 1 O•-IO I W O O 1 000 I 000 1 1 vrN I w 10 1o I Inoln I In oln 1 1 10 t~10 1 a 10 10 I t0.r 1n 1 aD Ci1n I I •-10110 I U 1 N N I In r1 v I I vwlta 1 X I I V)+/)V? i vYt/}t!) i NNN I I F I U I 1 ii I H I I F I a I I 1 1 R1 1 I Ca i I I 1 i i N 1 O 1 1 1 1 I E I 1 I 1 I F I y C I C1 W W i W i IIW 1 > 1 a 11 '7 I I I O n i o F n i V i i i a W u 1 O a i `° 0 i C U G i C i i Z 0 1 H ~.1 1 H na+ 1 a O I F O 1 1 0 ~.~ I a -1 l a ,-1 I I H ua~ 1 na+ I uv I I F 0 1 w m 1 a m l e 1 I Q a+ II I V II I pzN II I Z Z++ II 1 1 .7 ~ ~ ~ H o.~'Cy 1; ~ . ~ ss s a~ ~ ~~ ; a 'yO t ~ C p ~ r [U p F ~ 4 E ~ < 7i1 OW '0 7i~; '0 7i V N 7'O ~11O +m+~tti i.I°,U •a Y 1 O 1 +m+7tti i.`°, F+m+76' i ~ V i i V wF 7 g >7iZa C 7 s ~ o B>jioa z 8•»i i( 8>7izC Y mNiHa i o a ~rmylHHoNO+II U}Iy~11W r°~a~ i w< r~ar~. ~ e~.m~ar~a"r~. ~ ~Har~a~ i i ~ I j i 112 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I~ 1 01 I 1 1 1 I I O 1 ~ 1 1 1 I I I 1T. I O I I 1 1 1 I I (ry7 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 t I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1- I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I .'1 I rl 1 N 1 I I O I O I r 1 a i U i E i oiOO i U I [ Or 1 I I I I Uw 1 N I N 1 N 1 N I w F I 1 I I 1 I I I I O H I O 1 O I O I O a i ~ i ~ i ~ I 1 f'I I 1A 1 In I O I I ti I •-1 1 rl I In 1 1 O I O I O I ti 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I ~ i La N ~ Z N i Z N i oa N I ~ I a ;I `7 iRl `1 ail a o i z F o ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ap ~ .`~, >. I O 1 M~(tOP 1 toOr10 1ln OrlO ~~//jj 1 In H.-I yl F l a I ~ENM M I .-1 MIn (7~H 1'-I H{n M•f~M 110 X r/10 H 1 110 Ha a 110a~ Ira I1D .•~ Wa l.•+F01 a I 1 papd~ ar of a~ ~ of ~ ~ of v~.,: o~ I i EFa a i VFIFW20a. i VF1F0•za i UFa Ga. i I I i I 1 I M 1 I E 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 I 1 O\ 1 1 1 I t I O I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 r I .•1 I I 1o I o I I 10 1 in I I ~ I 1 U 1 1 /'~I 1 • 01 I I 1 I N I N 11 N I I I N I I O 1 I O I I 11 O I O 1 1 0 I 1 I o II 1 1 1 10 1 10 1 I ~ 1 I O 1 1 I q I I I 1 I 4 I 1 a M 1 a M i t ~ i ~ a c•1 m ~ ao 1a 1a-I ~ v F i 1~0 01`On > >.. F c ~ ~ F i 3 M + a N a ~/ Nj ~ O ~ N ~ W 1 A I I UFa a p l i Fa W "' rn m Q V • 0 • a s N I a y M 01 F 01 OI U H >• M (y F a O M Q w m W U A F h OOD ~ Y .-. ... y 1 N m o+ ~ m a o B o c m ti a -~ O q a VI F W O ~ F Rf ~ F Z 2 O O z ~ w F E y °'w ~ o Z O ~+ U F V1 w a y1°/~ Z ~ Q aJ £ < O < o w w ~u U q V! q CJ m O M 10 O i 1 I 1 i I I y 1 I ~ I la 1 Is I I E I .W 1 I a 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 2 M q Z O w z 0 M F U O F V] 2 O U O Z H q Z w z 0 H F U O a N Z O U C7 Z M A Z O w z O H F j F U O U U Z M A Z w z O M U O a F y 'L O U O Z M q Z A w z O H F U O a F N Z O U C9 Z H 2 w z O M U O F y O U I 1 O 1 O 1 O i O 1 r i O I I O I O I IO I O 1 01 1 O I z 1 0 1 o I r 1 o I m I o 1 0 i 1 I 1 1 I I M i O I O I 01 1 In I 01 I In I F 1 In I Ih I C7 1 N 1 N I N I U I N I 1 1 I I 1 0 I I 1 I I 1 l a I 1 1 I I I 1 4J I I 1 1 I I I< I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I - I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I O/"I C~ 1 O O 1 000 I N N I O M I O O I 1 0010 I O O I Oln In I 10 10 I 000 I 000 I 1 0101`'1 I O O I O N 1~ I V 7 1 O •~ I O O I 1 O N h I O O 1 1[1.•1 C'1 I .+ 10 I O O I t~ N I 1 N l-1 m l O [~ 1 1"1 N •-1 I C O 10 1 N •-1 I t0 10 I I 10'-1 V I •--10 I '•1 ./ 1 I .9 .y I 1 'I I I 1 1 I I I NtA+A I VJVfN I iRJ/)L! 1 VfViN I NL?N I V}NtR I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I z 1 1 I I 1 I I O I I 1 I I 1 I M I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I W 1 I M 1 II I II 1 11 1 N 11 1 ~[ VI II 1 II la I 17 I IN 1ON I r1 I U I M G 1 01 C I C I N C I Zr C I 1o C I N 1 O 0 11o O I 0 1 O I<~ O I ap O I 1 r W -.i I -.1 1 +•1 I W .N I O +•I 1 +-1 Iq 1 Z ua+ IW nM I ua~ IF ua+ IaF u~+ I W ua+ 1 I W w a I F a 1 a l a a I a a I F a I I F1-JZN Il l a z~ 11 1 Y II I ZN u 11 1 .J ~u II I a Y u II 1 l a ON I ON I NO 1 3 OWO I U il0 I NO I 1 O f•1 O •~ N I W N .~q I N N O •-+ y l y N 0 .d y 1 2 2 O •-1 1 1+1 O -+ N 1 I W U F U -~ 9 1 F rl'p I N m U ••-1 '~ I F U -•1'O 1 U ••1 ~ i 10 Z U -•1 b I I U < C 1 M U < C I N10 < C I • U < C 1 < C I m < C 1 I N F O'~ q a 1 E p.p'7~~'O 7 I WW '0 ~ 11-1 O'0 0~!! ~ 1 M N '0 mY1~ 1 W~,1~ 'p 7 E~FV7w i 0 F+m' 7w i FF V 7w i ErF+m+7w i £E +m+7w i F£ +m+7w I IlAOVIaomIN Inaomlaa aomlominaomllno aomla aom I I O F Z B TI -• 1 • Z B -•i Y• I B --1 M I N 10 Z B --1 >• I .'1 .1 I 1 O •-1 » l 0 O -•+ > 7 1 ~-• F -•+ > 7 1 O TI > 7 1 6» i (r ~ ~> 7 I IOFU++mYI•• U+~ma~lZ2 ++m++IOFU+~ma+100 Vy mill z.y VV1 m41 I 1••OWNa•71w WNr.7lrl o-1 Wa w7i ..a 0GW 0~•40•i.. .. WW60.i~ WPM. [.0. I 1 wmawaw I- a aw 1 .. .. 1 I I 1 a0 1 µio I ao I 'pco I 1 I I F 1 F 1 w F 1 F 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I N I M I M I H I M 1 H I I ~,` I £ 1 ~' I E 1 £ 1 E I T. I I I 1 I 1 I F 1 O I O I m I .•1 1 m I O I U' 1 M 1 N I .i I O 1 N 1 O I W I O 1 O I O I O 1 O 1 .-1 1 1-J 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I •-1 1 1 I I I I 1 O I I I a i U i m i U i U i i U I O 1 ~ 1 I I 1 U I I £ 1 I I m I 1 1 Wf. 1 I 1 1 i N I I i I i I I hN I O I O I O 1 O I O I O I O 1 m 1 ~ I O 1 m I m 1 m l a 1 0 1 0 1 o I o I o I o l a 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 10 I O I N I O 1 O I ~ 1 I ~o 1 1 I I I I M I h 1 O I N 1 m I O I 1D 1 10 I 10 I [~ 1 h I 7 I O 1 O I N 1 O 1 O I •-1 1 I I I I 1 1 < I 1 1 W I 1 q I O 1 1 a I p I 1 < I a N I I A V I Z In I 10 1 O [~ I M I M 1 1`7 1 W Ih I C7 1 a M 1 9C I q M 1 -1 1 > 1 1 I W act a 1 .] acI < it ;I $ ; I W r-1 I 1t7 ; I M O I O 10 I O q V' 17 W O 1 a •'+ I Z ti >• I N x •-1 I N .d ~ Pl >• I m< .•+ I~ >• 1 0 M .r >• 110 UrVlv1 1 of vvlF 1 O VIVOF I r< v-+F 1 t~OV1~r1[IF 1 v>r/1V'OF 11'1 t010 M I [~ In l0<M 110 1n0-1 I H SOMw 1 a 10PH 1 .+ t001r 110 Wt•7 wa I to 01 wa 1 .~r~w Ina I z rna I w Na 1 ~w /•'Ia 1 ac O I F ~ O I X v! O I O i O I W i! O I 7! O I qZN i •q ZN I 22A••M I rJ V1A ••1-1 I DZA••M I ~zA••1-1 1 .]U-IOa I U1rOa I OI-+Ua I O ~•IUa I 00~-IUa I 1-+O~-IUa I c~Fazal Faza_1_ oazaFal UwaFal nzaFal FzaFa C•) rn 10 1 1 ~ 1 < IF 10 IF I I IW I h I a ~a 10 1 H IV I ~ Iz 10 IU iW I a' E z ~~ O ~~ o+ m v b d h .~ m a N 1 faA N ~ U O1 ~ ~ H w O ~ O .+ rn W U q Z ~ W h GOD b y 1 N OI OI .-1 '. ~ 'J C 41 g R a W O M F fA N F Z z a o M O M l7 a F ~Z{' £p O ~ F Z O ~ V w a z ~ a E W U E U A VWI q N OI O rl b O I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I i I i 1 1 I I I N I IX I I ~ 1 I 1 I ~^ 1 I W I la I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I - 1 1 I t I I IZ I 10 I 1 M 1 IF 1 14 1 I U I I o I .`~i 14 I 1 I Z 1 1 O 1 1 M 1 I ~+ 1 1 P~ 1 O V' O V y ~ O W W o S F a U a d H > y U ~ M O a a h N o r o rn O N O IA r rn r. o ~~~ I i i 1 1 I I i 1 1 I M I O 17 I I ~ Ir I N la Is IE 10 iH v O .~ a m Yi a 8 7 Z 8 a V O g '~ i M I II I I p $ I I U i ~ i ~ 0 W i ~ i q n N i a a v n i~z yy U~ 1 p 1 1 10 M if, C I I I I E 'O 7 1 I a I N WO QI I I 2 @ 0 711 I I M i.l O N 1 1 N -. 7 1 I 1 1 t+. F I I a~ I I 1 - 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I N I I 1 I }' I I I 1 I 1 ~ 1 I I 1 1 U• i N 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I O I I I •.i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I I 1 I - I I 1 .-I I 1 1 1 1 1 O I I I 1 Z 1 1 l a I I I l0 I 1 I 11 W~i w I I ii Iyrll O I I I O I ~ 1 1 la 1 o II I W I I 1 1 1 1 ~ I 1 1 1 ti I I 1 - O I I I I 1 I 1 of i `~ i rn I W 1 Z acl 1 i0 ilnw is irnx~ a i a ~ xx •• i i OF ~ O . a ip •-• M ~ T a r ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ V} t/! N F W VI F O W .+ a 7 a w £ O A ~ °• °a Q W A q W > Z j 2 H Z r7 4 4 4 F ~ F O N t` r ci N 2 O F e s s O F E Z O U W O Z O a S-I NORT~i ......~. 14 w ~ .- ~ - ~ ~' 19 `~0 1 d t ~~ ~ ~ a, 16 ?~ ~J ~ " 1.65 Ac. 17 ~ ~~ 3 .~~ ~~ ~ o f Sao ~' f ~ 19 ~ ~' ?~.~ ytio ~ ~ ~ b ~ to ~~ ~ 6 ~ !r .~ ~ /A ~~ si.u- I-II I ` • loo ~/nom Byrd pA Sc/wo/ .~ fi / O O O wos~'~9~~n BNGINBBRIN(i Route 1006 Stonebridge Circle Plant Mix: 0.11 Miles 1 12 ~~.a -'1~ - - -- :~,,,~ ~~~~ ~, gate ~ gI _ SPRIN G OvE i •nop I ~ `', SPRING GRe • ~cr ~ M:1 ~u f ~ ~,~ .~ VICINITY MAP ~ u . s-~ I ~.- N®RThi ....... 009 • g ~ ~„ ~~ N v 9 `'•- ~ ~ ~ ~ ;'`Z: _ v 3 N ~ ' ~ See AAop 61.02 10 '' 1" • 200' ~~ 6 S ! a ~° II ° os s ~ '`°, 2 5 12 ~1 a 9 • V ~~ a s +~ O ~` ~ 13 4 r 0 n ~ J .G iC P ~ PV[~' c °° SZ1~ / 15 rr 4 7. 16S At ti I~ a O - .••, ~ o °o yy~ L+ ~ J ti~ 22 r~ sa ° 6 z, ! __ y ~~ 20 oa q) 1i ~ ~ i• ~' i 7 ' '0 2~ 3 ? ~, 1~ ?9~S 19J6 o rJ a • 1 as 96 i ?S!9 t96~ 1970 2976 19B1q•^~r 1~, e O 'o a 2 ~ _c as i~ 2a Bd m a a 21 <C~ 7 9 ~ >• • rr.. cw. Slonebridge Circle °s 9 •A ~ s~ ° ~ ~ ~qiT I 9 9SJ d ~7q 1963 197: 1977 n I41ysi ~ ~~6 10 II ~ i2 _ 13 P4 °a I r. v ~ r! ss6S b K '~ ,ra ~~96! P P/O 61.11-I-II r' " ?°0s I' • 100' +0 25 ~~'~ Wd/rOrn Byrd 9f~ ~ ilal Wash~~Q`o^ Route 1007 BHGINBBRING stonebriage Drive Plant Mix: 0.19 Miles 13 ~ i ' /~~ •" ~i • " '~\ ~ ~~ ~ H~ "/ • ~ `% i <~~/ • ~ ~ ---' ~ `~~ ~ f~ ` ~~'~O~jT URII ~~. ~. ~ `l` ~'b ... _. ~O. ~ ~ V ynw !- ~ ,~.o -~ , - - ~ V1ClNIT1' BLit rIY ~ / \` 1`~ i~ ~~ vi 13 ./ u py 14 ~` ~O~ e \ 24 ~~ ~~ urr \ r ~ K ,~~ ~ s, ~3 an ~, \ 19 ?2 ~ \ ,~ eee. / ,, earl ~ ~,•' ,r ~ ~ i , / ~b .1 ~~~~ 21 ~ ~ eIJJ ~• ~ e~ ., ~ e ""/ . ~ ~ \ oJ~ 14 •~ /7 8 ~ ~ ~~~ •i:e kS ~° i , ~~- 4 ~ p / sx/ Ig r° K1. /,~ I7 ~•.N YJ/J 13 B~e a~// \K. 'iae g+q, ~ J ' ~ ~ \\ ' .. t~/ f` t \ a \ e//• q3 K,i\2 e '6y 1~ ,~ Y/ti 5 I pf' 17 \ S s' ~,9 p~ ~„e ~~ d ROUTE 1832 NORTH BARRENS ROAD" B1VCsl1VBB~11Va PLANT MIX: 0.17 MILES 3 r - ~9 e P`' P~r rate \/y 21 14 ~..._____ v..A_~.__~__ ~~ ar, ,awe _ . ~'~ '~ x '0r"r. HUMII11~~ ~ HIIIS .,, 3~ ~~~ ~ roel \ 9UC7t •_~` N ~. f t S- i I -~ NOR?'8 S - ~,.~ e ao° psa„ axa a -alas. - o ~ ~ 1.03AC ~ . xm I .>? 6 ) B 9 ,t° ~ I.OOAC 100 AC I I.i1AC I 19 I.SIAC lOII I.OIAC ~ ~ ~c O sa ,tom ~.~ ~ 3 :,,. ti~ I6 Lp1 Ac !~ e~zs ei» II I) IOOA< R • i. 3 sox 4 I.H1c O S/I! O 16 Sri 1.02 Ac 12 ~ aov 3 1.30AC 2.l6 Ac a i Zr ~cia vle .iii ~ /, I ,p~' , ~ ~~4 ~a1 l6{AC 9! 183e 1.1 13 2 iD Ac s vats K L37Ac / ^ BNGMBBi71VG ROUTE 1936 UPLAND GAME ROAD PLANT MIX: .55 MILES 4 /. ~~ ~`~~ 5 NORTB ....s_ ~~, W O ~:.:: °~~~~ 320 a G / •. .:. 77 .etCrK1 ' Q u / ~ 698 6'. '~ ' o ~- - is:. G ~ `r qq .. :~~~ 3n \ /~ ~ p4 toq.°o ~/6q ~ P t , boo . NPS\ON .: ~. ti ` °.~ / 6 .'.'~62q ``~ ~ S9 ~/ ~tp\!1 0 X ~ ~ 622 glq 8~~ _ M : , ~ C7 0 \ ` ~~~~~~~ ~~ rilrr T11~ T11pGE5~ ~ 62q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ON}a ~~ ~~~~~~ . ~`i~r: ti~~.r t..~i ti .r 1. ~1 }~.:_ ,. : tp S MDt J 1 .. F 5 C 1 bN s 1 1 ` ~ z+° a~O~E ~ 697 ~~- /' 1 ~° '~ P,Nf ~ ~~ t wg1, r ~Mwens Slot• j P GP ~ a ~- Gp Gom• RNu41 1 62 c _ / 1 F X11 / , t ~ l>~~ '622 ~ N~~~N :::/ I ~°~ 1 d~ 4 ~R+a \ ~ :. 615 5 P\9 :2~ ~: ~:rr:r/ ~ jg''; \\ boaynw y ~~\S ~~ $ ~ ~ t1~ rTow ow/~"35 ~ 11a ~ . 1 \ ~ O ~ 4 ~ ' +' ~~ ~ .~: d. 112 1 ~ (,uM Q~ ~ '{~ ice.. 1 • ~a W3 6q i ...•.'.'. ~..: q60 1 .927 Gle+v°r ~ = 1'.'~'. j a7 E61 Cori f•ot1 ~... 1 C own ~ 69q ~. 1 \ r -os ~ 1 s r_~~ (635 1 \ w2 *,.c.vc ~~~. 1 O \ a~ocR 1 • 221 RMa 1 \ 91p u. CMFRR O~ 1 ~ ~ "0"`0`- ~_ ~ / ~ ~ 6i2 '+~ l0~ 1 F 1 1 ~ ~ ^' 639 1 i ~ //~ '~ BINGIIYSBRING Route 622 Bradshaw Road Plant Mix: 1.50 Miles 5 ~+5 16 °i Z..r' NORTA 't '~ ~ / • .:~~ v ~ ~ oat ~'~ r-~ ~'. 70~ ~~ v ~~ ~~ yU ~• ~, ~~ a~ 620 `~~. 873 6s6~' ~ ~: ~~ ~. 624• ••• ••• ••••~~s• • `'i'P~1iR!~~.~ 'i~if .tom SpNOS ':~ `..•;.;•• • ~ON~ ~•'.. • . . ~~` , ' ~'" Gp ~s ~ (~omi': ~ Ri~u4i' C~ ~: 622 (,~ ~;~ ~ ~ p~H • .; j K~~ '.~yJN • .= j ~~ `~. 6t9 ~~ ~ / ~ E ~ \•_! . .~~:~~ .`~,~.. ~ ~~ ~ BNGINBSRING Route 624 Newport Road Plant Mix: 2.00 Miles 6 >> S- I ~Q NORT,B ~..~... A iC~ ~ ~°°~~'•b ~ .21 Y ~~ ~ •y ~ ~ ' S9 Z. ..yre ',, w ~. ~.• , 7;` ~'~ / __ ~ '~ 33 l~ ~sr _ •-\l ~0j3 +r ~Z`~,~ 1, 1// 4° J _\ \ 2 /~ \ ~~ ~; i '~, ~~. ~~ !II •,` / ~ / ' \ xOJI qMr 1 aM4 a a'°xrr / _~ i ~,+~ xor A at• sz n .• u aq4 •~~ •:IJ /-~ L •Jq arxr •sa 4 ~ ~ ~" ~t z,~ R ~~ ~• ss r, z aa,r a ~ ~ _ .....w G J/ •" 't { '; . 9~ r j.t/S +? . ~ / agar ao ~•> , u: ~:~ r / f [ar•y J•.w~ MH N M-u• U 3•w aaeo a a ~., ~. ~_ ~~ ~ ' • zar i i,... N~ ~~ .:~,, 1 ~ 3 k TS00 •w•. w ~\ ~ , \S lMr .a • ~ p `O R E't/Ct~U ~ Sh~a~-G In ION. ~ nor • ~ ~ '°'~ \~ ~ ~ M ti •. } ~1 1600.~i 9 ~ \ q .. _•, NN i 0 .. `1 p I p•• ~ a y air '.. x ~~ n,. » r,» ~' xxW, xyx ~ IS ~. ~" xiM - JI ~U~ I ~~\ J ~ ~ _ ~_-~. BNGINBSRINO \" s~ ~l ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ ?wir - 63 O ~ ~ y ~ •` y,/ »i ~ ~ ;. 1 ~~ :~~ ~~~ T 32'x. d N A a :~.. r >. . ai at `~,~{ y '•' ~' • >o .•, !t ~ H ~ p~b t, tt • Y Q Y. a x. f ' ~ A Y ~jJ C• yY2. ,+ '•~ m ,r K ~; ~ ~' •aa x~x .~ w~ ~ ' I r~iw•cw.R. Route 651 Mountain View Road Plant Mix: 0.68 Miles 7 & 8 ]8 .~~' ~~~-w-~.'Y"_.'i~4~}._e~i.c4iR+. ~';-:.~Itt~ .~..-i...Fe`s~...}'S$ltbai~.'~ y v-:=i '' i ~~~~ ~~t~ y Z~ a ,~ ` s /yam. w S-I NORTB 6~ ~r/~ ,~„~. Rt. 1849 ~-- ~~ M ~. ~ ' ll' 2 ~ ~n C b •i. ., 2! I n ~ ~ ~O 2 ., O ~ r,,; ~ /4 m 26 Q1' y'Si 78 42 0 ~ o o ~- ~ c ,az 9~ L 43 ~' ~ r 3 o o ati ~o i 39.67 ~r ~~~ BNGINSeR71V(i Route 1907 Charnwood Circle Plant Mix: 0.09 Miles 9 19 S- I ~- NORT1~ ~~ .1/ ~« 7 t~ .- 9 6 n 13 4~ y ~„ ~ y O od° •~ ~ ., o , w .,.n s ~ „ s .~ ., p 8 ~ ~~ 3 w ~ " rY 2 r R ~ ' ti s,~ ' .p~~ ~O ~. ~ j 29 u ~ N ^ ' t ~. 'f / 1 $ is ~ o '~ ~ "~ 32 Z 16 ~ p Ri ~ M P ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 r b ~ r ~ x i ~ 18 Ms. ~ ~` 3S 20 O ~ ~ 19 M • rtae n Route 1908 ` ~~ Grove Lane BNGINBBRINO Plant Mix: 0.15 Miles 10 & it _ 20 SI ~-' NORTB ... r • t \ M • ' ~ `. f ~~ ;'' . ~. t ~~: \ 5 ~ N / M D~ ~ ~ ' i 1~ ~y 2 •^ ~ L~ •~• ~' I' r ~ /•`` bsa~s. / ~, r.J.•,~~ / / j // M.~d 1'q~' ~f1 ~ ; ~ .r~ ~ ~~ r ~ v ~i !t • Ufa . .~ ~ c5 f ~ ~~. ~..Na f ~~, .gyp • ~ ~ '~a .e' _ ~ .r M'A, S, p pfA ~ Z 1 S ,. ~ a~a A - Ala' W MN y'.N ~ Wpa ' „ j ~ to r i.~ ~p•%q ~.~ ~ fit' a• ' 6~~a / +7 3 : ~ " t ~ 1 r r Q'~~a ' M ~ ~ .; ;iA j'~ / o /. r 7 ~..• ~ it ~ Y ~~ ~ ~ n i aF ..~~ ~ .~ ae+~ +• .,~ ~ " ,. ~ '•M a''', •' _, t ~ •,.'a a~ . .•f ~. BNGlNBBRINO Route 1876 Sierra Drive Plant Mix: 0.22 Miles 12, 13, & 14 21 Q'S-~ NORTS ...~.. esss O '00 5903 '~ j s3 41 ` ~ 5855 20 5839 25 21 °° ~ 4 5932 16 !~ 16 a~ _° 14 ~ bs 13 15 ,~ ,B ~ 32 ~°, 9 j goo ° 3004 ~ a ~ /7 1q0 ~ N 2°6 9s'OS ss N 31 5. ~ ; ~ 30/2 ~ h i6 5838 ~' ~ 12 -~ ^ 302/ 2 '~ 95 s4 ~ \ ~ „ 1O 9 /°p 223 ~ ~ of a 34 ; 2. ~3 A 237 e4 3020 j : ^ ,6 5833 _ 58~ '0w ej 49 `~ 5C ~' ~ - ,s 3035 ~ 6 i2 zs II ~ 35 ~~J 3028 ° a /26 j ~ti S25 /~ 3 4 le+ ~ 1.03 Ac eh M f0 N 93l 7 O~ ~ 36 ° ~ P 2s S921ti 9p 2s „ 48 303 s ' `, / > i3 110.1 ~ 5834 s1;2 3'4r S7 24 d9 ^ ~ ~ 5911 ~ ;a P ~, ~ '4~' a ti~ 7 'Q ~ „~ 10 37 95 5828' 2 1 le 2 25:3 ' 5903 ~ s~ 3042 s ~ ~ 204 X21 6 ~ ^ N ~ / 4 7 pp. Ost~@ a 4q 45 ~ ` ~~S ~ 38 2s 9i 16 2489 1669 IToCk 70 ~92~ 3g 5B4/ a 16.s5 ~ 15 ROQf~ ` ~ ~, 19 e9 „ °~ 39 ~ z' 3 ~ 12S '"OS/~8 9j 5833 vo° 58~ ,, ~ 40 5924 ? ?59/6 g I ~~ ^ ~ ~O0 s • 5906 ~ RqC~ ~°ii 7 ~~ 6 ^ ti _ BNO/NBBRlNO Route 1517 Hereford Road Plant Mix: 0.15 Miles 15 22 ~, 6b ~ r n2 6 r 613 W ~ ~ ~':~. i .... ~~ 771 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•Ot~ ~-~~ f~MCtVR tRORw- •szl 1p !•Oil / b sR20~ ~~~'~ 639 Mir[ ~~ ~ W2 attoc. L ~' ...~ vrcrNrrr~ /~^\ •~ ~ NORTB `~ BNGAVBBRING Route 639 Harborwood Road Curve Improvement: 16 0.10 Miles 2 Q S-I NORTH ^'~~ ~,o ~ ~ ~ ,6 ;, is c, a ~~-'6 ' h~'~e ood .s3 ~~, H`9 d. ,5 6 ~~ e 9g ~~ 3~ ' 5 J j4 ~9 9 s s4±~ ~ 26 O ~ ~ 6 Q D 1 h_ 2E9 9 i2A I iiA a m Z0 N 2 02 ~ l i 39 ~ ~ : ~ - `S~ ., ; ~~ ~s 44 r 24 a 45 1.57 AC v ~., ~ - ,, ~, S54r ,,~ -. ~ d3 :; ~~ P~ ~;,1 ; ~, a .I a~ D. N s 25.1 212 Nf y~~ N ~ ~ J r ti > ~ ~: 2 4. I w r' >~ 22 \ Z C6 ac 45j, ' 23 • •A 4649 v ., yc~ m, ~~ ,n N t6~'6 a ~ ~~ Off, Route 689 BNGINBBRING Rose 1 awn Road Curve Improvement: 0.03 Miles 17 y ~' '89 -Rose lawn ---Rood ....~ ~, I.a~ ~ / r ~ ~ MGM(: . ~ ~ .... .. ~ 7.ht 1;. 7•r,•. ;.,. ot.aca ~~+' ~ ~ .ea CNMM 1 M ~^ ~ °~ 769 ~ ~ ~ ~ • LONG / • RIDGE ~ vrclNrTY~ " Q S-I NORTB '~:c 'E .!4' 16 8.24 Ac 5~ 18 j ~~~ 8.50Ac 62 29.17 Ac (Di 43 ?4 Ac(Cl 62 1 I50Ac ,avy 0 a ' ,,~ 18.OO.:c 31.2 28.35 Ac 31.1 zOOJAc ~_ i r, 28 ~ LCi~Ac Lone \ -See Enlargement . '27.2 ~ ~6;~ 1.02Ac 2 . 25 Llo !6 ~~n a 1b 118 19 ~ 17 III Ic ~ I µ Ac q 1.52 Ac ; a Ac iBf+f+ 14 7 • 2 OC A ~4 17 ' i I 2 ~4 ~ ' 28Ac 44Ac - 7,4`1` ,Y. :o~n ir.r / Route 639 BNGINBBRING Harborwood Road ' Spot Improvement: 0.19 Miles 18 25 ~~ 7 ~VHC T~ 'e'n ~ ggUS~ MOUHTUN C / + •'~~ e. ~/NppfN ~ `'w.: / ~`' 9° ~'~. ~e1~EffEa~~N ~~ '~~ NATIONA4 ~~ ~. ~ t 2 - ` ~ ~~ t,a Sze ~ip~S ~, ~q, o-34~ 6~p ,'.. ce1y~o 'WF ~ RIDGE 6Ze . . ~~. ~. .~. ', ~ ~a• 0) RAM 69~ gee t e `~• p\ „~ ~ SnNDSTON~~~~ 52? ~ •~~ ~y,N __ -- ~s. VICINI?7 MAP ,~~' .,s ~'ei,, ~ ~ r~ .~ gee- 1NORTIl ' ---- l t . G P /~ ~ ~/ /. G ~ uN~P\N `~ ,~ 1A~: ~ ./OaJ~c~~S~N~~o~, O~ ~~ o ° X89 ~ Pay ~~~ ~Q ~ B~oas~rn. ~ ..L/~7 C (13.00 / 21.00) !~~E 8F Route 624 Newport Road BIVGINBERING Plant Mig, Spot Improvements and Curve {~lidening -- ._ _ _O ~ -~°`. W 11F" ~, / Ca~e~ee 3i .: 'L~ c~ , ~~O ~ ~o c `o`ff ~ 622 \ g14 _o P`~ ~.:: ~~ !! /t jMavens State " j 26 ,~" 'L`J' NORTH ,~ 32 80.73 Ac ~ 72.30 Ac (CI. 30 ` 23.so Ac CMv~d e IM Bn/AN» t. -,~-"' 17 47 SO Ac (d 38.42 Ac (G 2 a 22 21 28.%Ae O 24 20 %Ac 2.1 28.96 Ac a '00 Ac ~ 422 2.20 ~ 41 9.11 Ac ,. /42.4 ~) fl00 At0) 9.73 At IC) 2 ~) ~_ 4.00 At ~ w r M ]W 000 ~ 31 9.00 Ac 3.46 Ae 33 3.39AC~ 3.73 Ac 34 l00 Ac O OQ t 733 27 _,1225 Ae (0) 4.91 Ae (C) 4900Ae 'qY S>> 36 79.OOAe i~\ ROUTE 614 BNGINBBRING ~ BOONE CHAPEL ROAD UPGRADE OF GRAVEL SECONDARY ROAD (20) 31 40.48 Ac 28 2QOOAe 26 zs.99 Ac ro) 31.06 Ac (C1 27 Q- `~. NORTH '0 e i t ,Isar loo ~ ' ~ , ~ row! ,a1 e Poor ~ ~~ ss 2 / ~~O,rO i9 Nr,1 ~-~ ~ (2 ) ,for ~ / 11 ~J as fl1 20 ~' yy ~ INr M%4 III '~ 3 ~ { f r1C1 .., 2 ~ 22 e t . )!~ • a a)1 ~ .`~ s SN 2 I f 00 r ~ .(^ Jl1 ~ ~I 2a b i N 2ri1 F ~ ]6 lu a2r / 1071 ` r7oo1 / 27 a,ia1 23 !10401 7 'R en ap -1 ~ ... r '~ e ~ f ~S 1 sfal N S1 .71 Xl ' 9 ' 2,f1c1 ~ e rairlo ~fe)1 ~ 2e r) b1 / 71 f7 r ]22!10 ~ )e 0700101 e)004 [I ]0 29. ~ i!>D 1 '. CM> ]9 ~ ~ Frrr•. f)tr 10 I I e00101 9rf1a7 y2 1]2 11 ~ e ~ « ]I aWr e07l101 a0Y1 ` • e1 Y 72 )O a<[I // 1) 6 fJOr _ l 111 ,),)a< I~ K \ ~ fon a. 71 f7or IILO~V rw1 ~ to } -f 101 4)01 2fJ1101~ la ~~ rc, cl T R ~ 211: ~ \`II R ' " f ' sa\ 1 a,ral r K 7lrS: ~ •r•7rb 2e / / feVrKl ~ 20001 ~ 7~! 1 ( - _~~rfrm, M g /tt rc- ~ 27 ~ M 11.1 70%1 MforO, % a+aor + 72N1[I q )` ~ l (.O 21 / ` \ \. t!) ?%1 \ ate a2.f rx a. \ ~ :s~lr ry \\ ~ rt2r 1YYr 1~ ]~{:erKl ~ (113.00) ~ ~ •R \~ ---- _ - - - -,. ..__ I 1 • ROUTE 677 ENGINE&RING ALLOW BRANCH ROAD UPGRADE OF GRAVEL SECONDARY ROAD. 28 ~- -s= ~ NORTH ~^ c- . ~ II a 't` eorr°n ti8 12 / w ,~ ~ .~ j e 12 0 i '' ~j 8 13 ~~`f~ 5 p la -,, r ~ ,, ~, r 8 '<< ~s 11 'y as r •~) ~, Foonol• County Boone oI Sup~rritort 4 I ' ~ 2.SZAC y ~~ 2 9 62 Ac i °o i ~ r ~ + ` °~ 2.1 ~ ~ '' + .ate . s, ~ } O w 16 10 ~ , ~ . P ,~ ~ I ~ i p +d,+ J 1 ~ ~ '~ 9 +eo .o o '+4 Norihmonl , a, - ,~ ', ~} ~ ,h a ~~ so •s r~ ° ~ = ~ \ ~ lOl 26 _ I9 19 ; \ O ~~ • ' I I ~ a ~ \ - `~7 " \ \ ~ , r O , ~~ e. ~~ ,~ 1 No.~A (~oonoRr ,,e ~ v \ ~ \ Cip~~~b / ~ i \ ~ n5 { 32 0 o b \ ~ \ r + ~ .! O J 'IY'M .W. ~ / \ \ ~I / \ \ , ;33 ~Opd~ x~ \ \ \\ 3 ~ \\ \\ \ eK' ~~ Z \ \ a= Gte ~ x~ ~ K 1 2~ \ \~ ; 26 p e~e~ i i \A ~S • ~ ~ ~' ~ x.79 Ac. ~ x ~ ~ . 5 , 25 s \ ~ ~2 ~0° 0 ~\ 'r +if_ ~ \ b 28.1 ~ O \ ~ 26 c r \ 48 s 4 J \ / « 1 ~, rp ~ ~ 6 9 s. . ; b •~ r : ~° ry ti - ~ 65Q Ac \ ROUTS 1832 BNGINBBRING BARRENS ROAD RECONSTRIICTION 22 29 ~ ~ ~~ A PENN W ~P .'y,~ o_ GIFcNMON!~tu"~d~1.~ r~~4~' / "~ `iii ~ 1 BLVO y ~y. cowxlso a ,~ '? h ~M.=~ ®7 ~ BF'IIE M ~o ~ ~{W~li EY pp~~~ gg,rypy d ~~~1 ,$~ %~ ~ '!'I C ~ ~~ ~!u `% ~ &' FADE !)Rt ~:;-...-...` CNlI! "".~..K'A~. tlb!~.EUf(70N~ ~ _ ~` ~ ,~Qr ~, ~% 613 BEE E ~CRnlR~ ~ ~'~~F"„~~ ~~~ L ~ ulxaq,q a- S CAN ~ %ygg~ ~ ~_ ~'.~ \ ~, o~tw. Pay1p~ 4'' ~°urQ„4 s "- 4.'3~ P~ 'FIf4 RO c~. `4JE ~-'P~~L #~~i s "~ m K ~~ ~. n! wK'f' ~~' ~ ", sRvriK ri s .^ It ~ ~-u+'~p"~1° cs ' ~ n !~S%l1'-•" ~SPRIN~WN, Fl~~~~.ACE __,_ ~•..- ~ ltroax~ru.,s \. y o ~ ~ ~q~K^ F .g ~~ fROMA Tax` i^.~e'~ ~j • ~ \ ' ®4 -1541 G 6 4,x~.R, R sEC59€~~rn. ~ ~~ ~~<`' ~~ ~ '? ' ~~~~ 0~4®, r ~.-`l'_~ \_._nunri .s~fx+c..vi,wws `~a ~0.~,~a~.~'. ,~~4A ~~ 9'. .~ ~c~ t ~n ~Sdd' `~ op~yy,w ,~ A. . 9 9a iPuul. ~ ~$ . S ,i ~! `ASTOR Av ~ MNER / RC. G~'~aw~°N`~~ir Gi~iO~t ~-- - _-_:_ .. ~y ;~;~~` ~l-~ac~nS~~r~RFl BD ~---~+":`~' .~,,...~, ~ ~, VICINITY MAP ~' :• -_ ~: .-_ _ COMMUNITY SERVICES sTAR~CtY ~oA~ AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT # 0904-080-215-C-501 23 30 ~. s- i NORTB -- - ..-. ~~ ._- r F ~ ~~• 1 v is .~+.~. vM ~ ~1 / / 1 ~ ''.. //V ~~ ~.~7e N.31 Ac , m ~ 18.~l~t _ 2.OOAc o.~ rio ze.oa-r2 r • 200' r i~ i " ~ ;. a~o~ St• Mo0 28J0 r . ao' .' ~s~ s ® ~r~ ~~ o~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ e i -~i^ «~ , ~' a r m, n ~, f Route 605 BNGINBB'RING Sanderson Drive Reconstruction: 0.20 Mi. 24 31 Q No~~ ~/ i~ iil i ~l! ~j~ 1 , ~~ r' 2S 2100 4c It11 IC ,# ,~~ `'»'•,r 0 stir (63.0 ) ~~ ~ 1 o ~ ~~~~ SI. •911c ICa O ~i } ,~.~ \ ~~ . ~ R~--~ 9N7 P! ` \ ~ ~.~~. 212.4 \ ./ /~ Rao .1 tick /~ i 2 s.• Mov ~s.oo 1' • 400' 0 t I Route 639 SNGINSBRING W . River Road Reconstruction: 0.33 Mi. ~.,, zs ~ ~ ~k ~ R~ ~~~ ,,.~ o.... ~Aoou .° ~ t.6'!9 ~. 32 ^, Q $-I N®R~ snrcnveswxo Route 613 Merriman Road , Reconstruction: 0.39 Mi. 26 33 1 ~ - - -.~.• - - - - -- 174cIC .o 3OO4c(Ol ~ Q 1174cfC1 ` 1254c(0 \ 25 AC (C1 ~ "•. 4 t i 3, ill ~~ ~ 13 . • , ~~~141 ~o'• 14 • ~ •14 2 ,~ 11.12 Ac(Df \ 6.97 Ac1U 14.3 ~ 1834c ~ \ i I 1. F9T LANE M r-- 7 - )1 J O IS s 6 35 4c { 97.03 ) ,~ 2 404 17 30 00 4c 1 D 1 is ~34c (C1 __ _,_ 2 s ss ao p. 1 1` ~~ { -. ,{ J Route 615 ; BNGINBBRING Star 1 fight Lane Bridge & Approaches 34 ~. s i 1 ®R~~ g.3 S 4. 47rr N _ w -__ _ aS4 • ' '11 B ~ ~F ~2 ~ 4y ~ ~ e~ • ~ 'a a - 40 'S.2 re ~°' - t3 ss , ; . . .~ ~~ • s~ • ~o o ~' r~ s a 13 a •e ~• 1 ~o: n' s~pm r enf. t 64 c` = . /p er ? ~ .~• t! vJ . S8 !!9 60 ~ ~ 63 ~0 1 6Y _ l . ~, 1 1 1 ® ._.~ ..o ~ C-..~nett ® r ri r s ... to ~ 1~ a ,O r ~ ~{+ 'r ~' v 30 >< I O ~ 1 I e ee re 3t ~. / ~ •• ~ ,e ~ . I 'a 33 32 o Oa / + er.e N .~ ~ fua ~ / ~ „ ~ ~ (~ Y 2- r er.e ~ ', KkhMpp~' ~ ~~ a r ~4 ' ~ ~ m 8 / / , d~ na 6 y. /o` , ~ ~ ~ i ~ s .f ~ 'd' o wr y a• e , ~ ~ ~ • ~ 34 ~ ~ ' . .f ( ~ ) t2 P ~ ` t ,e ~ 23 3 7 . 37 ~ \. P ~. + mss, O 6 ~ A ~ e x e 8 S if 10 ~: 3s ~ y ~~ a4 • n ~ . to ; e ~ 9 ~ a 15 rr ~ ~, r , Ii ~ '~' 1a K if ~'1 r ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ N µ.. t. ~~ ~~ ~i S .: e ~ ' ' jl . a ; ~ gh~ldoe , ~ • 0~ Route 1658 BNGINSBRING Cresthill Drive Bridge & Approaches 35 Q 5~ I N®1~T1~ SNGINLBRING Route 668 Yellow Mountain Road Reconstruction: 0.97 Mi. 31 36 a O i74 l/ 1 i 1 "~x LI r ~ l '~` I ~' 1 >~ ~,~,~i .,., nr~. v.w a.~ J ~ ~~~~ 3 140.04)- - I~~~ ~__ '_----- --- \J s~ \ ~ ~Ji 11 p.u~ i f 37 9 ,y 3S``y9i` ~~• ~ ~~~,+~~~~ X39 9, 30 38~ fee \~ . 29 ~ 'a 36 ~ ~ 1vA, ~ \ o~ ~ - A3 • 28 \ . `~~ i : 74c \ QoaO ~ ~: •~ ~ J ~' 3615 , 6 ~ l/ - ----- - _~ /fsf ® ,~\7 26s6es •~. x.25 ~ -~_ - a~~•dt ~ ww ~/ ~ ~~e a'I a~ 7 ~ w. . 1 CV~, /yye C ~-"/ i ~ ~ ~ -, , " ~ p \` ? 6 1 9 • t~Ac _i 6 S \ 9 a„qc ` 9 C ec 9 ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~\ \ s ~a /~ ~ ~ S \ 1 ~ ~ ' . ~i , ` ~ 5 7 mac ~ e9 `\ RI 670 ' - / ~. ~. y .p, ~ ., \ f9 3 a4~e,iLi \ % 4 \••~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ _-_ - ~ o` a / ~ ~~ 1~ ~ \ \ ~~ _ I 2 ~ O - - ~ ~ ,1 ' gee r ' V - A / -~" -_ ~` ~, ~ i 3933 ~ / ` ``~ i9 • / ~ . ~ (85.03) Route 670 BNGINBBRING Lost Mountain Road Bridge Replacement 38 fr? S ~ . NORT1~ - - `~`` . ao ~`~,o~ ~ ~ , ZZ~ ,, 6• ' ' ~ 964 ,c 6 3 `I~y ~`~al/ ~` '.I " ', Q zl ;~- / o to ~ , .° ~ + i~y~ , o \ ~c~ ' .- 11 e ,e .. * ~ ~~(~f Oye ~ fi\5 91131 : 1,2 \ , ° « 2 ! ~ .° a ~ a ~ '% e „ 18 ` ~ ~ .. `' °~~ ~ ~^ I ; ~ e. / ~ 17 °` I ~ ~ ., 3 ` r I6 '- i 15 . •r 14 i ~ ~„ ~ q ~ ;~ ~~ vt. ~ p° 's g~ ~ .A i 6 - ' eo h ., l ,r ~ r 0 •~ ,cf 4 37 ~ e SI 2 " w ' am / ~'+' 3 .~ A C B S ~\~~ ~ ~ ° °P ~_ ~ ,1~ Canty ~A+r.nNtro~,ve Carer ` s+ "o ACES .r 39. s 2 s04 ID) - \ 4 4 s ~e ~s lu s ~ 'a •' '~ . •~ a', eo ., ~ 10 ~ ~ .a'. 41 + ~' • • sn„ ` cu ~8 so / .' 6 ~ so ,; '',, „ ~ a . 49 ~ 32 ~' ~ ~ r, , 4 3 '~ 2 l 1 ° , 5 ~ u ', , , ~ ~ ~ ~~ II q- g , R pre ~ -` a~4 ~ 16 '~ ~ sc e•o 13 z~y~ t „ » A a r. ~• ~° ~ r' .. ~ 8 b° 'x' .o' as 12 : 17 ~ ~ ~ ~ r i ~ e ~ f ~ 14 ~'~ ~o ,°+ roc s ~ w ~ • .e r 'r ' • ;?32 SS I r1 J ' I 37 ,~c,K~= .~ i~ ,46 38 - '~ ~~ i e 18 .~b, ~ w . i a 30 ~! au °c $ 62 • ~ ~-- ° • yr _n°'~ "'r 1 ~ ~ s c ~ ~ . ° / • ; ~ ~ ke, ~ 19 e • r !~ 60 i S ~ ~ 'b r ,. ea 43 :e° ~ • w• 47 a .: oro \ - 46 c '' ~ ~ 4g • .. it J Route 1602 SNGINBERING Bunker Hi 11 Drive Reconstruction: 0.18 Mi. 39 Q S.! NORTH ®~^ .r 14 R c•~ ao~r ~ y+. i .C i' ~ ~ { 5 1917 IJI d6d d1C ~s~s N '~ 190 y ~A ~61en:..~ z~ ~. 13 a e o w C.i b n • N 2!2 1~ ~i b v C. Z e' ~ ` ~ I ~ O i 6y. Zen ~ g ` e q 6! o I ~ 1_ ~( E R~ I ~O S Boa 06 ~ e6.i ~.~ Ie~ 99 I I lS ~ . 0 • s I 3 •b3 • ~O / ~~p9 ,,,, e r~ BNGINBBRI1Vli Route 720 Colonial Avenue Curve Improvement 35 40 Q S-I NOd~TB ..~..~ anrcnvsexnva Route 780 Cove Road Drainage Improvements - 3 5 ~ -- 41 Route 1404 B~VGINBBRING Timberview Road Reconstruction: 1.0 Mi. i . 37 _ c 42 _,A~_:~. ~ ! NOS .~..^. T~ 1.42Ac 4 ~ / . t»• 3.OOAc l01 1.31 Ac ld 8 / 2.56 Ae tC) 1.09Ae lC) ~ ISOAe ~ ? ss3~ ss/s 6 1.79Ac ~.13 Ac tDl 2. ~ AclCl 3 ~ I.OOAe ,~~01 .~o~ 2.19Ae 3 19 A '~ ss3s 4.1e Ac (O) 4'~' a~ S6l~ ~ ~. 5.97 Ae fCl 10 Q./ 16 !1 + ~67ac \` ~ ti~~l a.25 Ac t ~•~ ~ 12.1 , S1~i,b., • 8.60A C) 2C c.ea.~ ~ 12 ~~ e~/ 12 3a. s3u b K aoeAe( ti ~ ~, •.• ~• s6=S ~. •~ »• ss.~ Rt. 6~ I ~ 28 '~ ~ Y~Ibw ss>• ss~s ~ eta s a« S ~ a1 ` I ~ IW „ ~ 29 t ~ ~ 1.84AS6e0 ~ 4.39Ac (O) shat • ~+~•• 5.91 Ae (C) s~ 24 I ~ 11.70Ac I.OOAe sA1: c9s.oat 3f Route 915 BNGINBSRING Cox Hopkins Road .Reconstruction: 0.25~Mi. 43 I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111' AGENDA ITEM NO S - / APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR ..~' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~~~N / ~'~ ND TALL ~,aK RaA b SUBJECT; 9. ~'1 ~ ~~ t~ s (~co~/~,e~ ~~ --- -- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR 1'HE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will 6e limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO 1'HE CLERK N~ U,c~RRELL B1~AN TETT'ER ADDRESS cn n ~3 SYLVAN ~RnoK P~o~D PHONE R (~ A N O ILE . V ,4. 2 ~1- b t R I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: A Resolution Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Sanitary Fill Stump Dump and Inert Material Landfill on a 74.86 Acre Tract, Located on the East Side of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) (PETITIONER HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE UNTIL AUGUST 25, 1992) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the material on the rezoning requested by Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. for a special use permit to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill. Mr. Bandy has now requested a 30 day deferral to work through some remaining issues. Also enclosed is a letter from Ed Natt which indicates Mr. Bandy's decision to change his request. At this time, he wants to continue using the site for a stump dump as agreed to by the Board in 1989 and 1991. He has withdrawn his request to use it for construction material. He wishes to change only the 50 foot buffer requirement under the present conditions. Staff is opposed to using this landfill for any other purpose. However, because of the changes, I am asking the Board to send this back to the Planning Commission and planning staff for their evaluation. Approved by, 6~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator sa Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: s.a County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terry Harrington~I• DATE: July 23, 1992 RE: Request to Continue Special Exception Permit Request; Joe Bandy and Son. Inc. Attached is a letter from Mr. Bandy requesting that the Board continue his special exception request. Although the letter is not explicit, Mr. Bandy requests that his item be postponed until August 25, 1992. C: \ W P51 \MEMOS\BOS0728 .s.a JOE BANDY. ~ SON, INC. P. O. BOX 4061 ROANOKE, VA. 24015 PHONE: 342 -5187 EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR - DON •BANDY, PRESIDENT July 23, 1992 Mr. Terrance Harrington Director of Planning & Zoning Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA. 24018 REF': Petition-.for debris landfill Dear Mr. Harrington: . This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of 7-23-92, we are requesting the postponement of the Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for Tuesday -July 28, 1992. It is currently the position of Joe Bandy & Son, Tnc. that this meeting be delayed for an indefinite period of time. The following (3) items we are requesting recognition of: (1) Due to the expense currently involved in establishing this debris landfill, we are requesting termination of-a~same. (2) 10 acre we do not need . (3) we are asking to use our land within 50 ft. of the property line on the South side. If I can of any further assistance, please contact our Roanoke office. Sincerely yours, JOE BANDY & SON, INC. Donald W. Bandy President. DWB/kws THANK YOU LAW OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD HAND DELIVER 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. P. O. BOX 200G8 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 July 22, 1992 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 RE: Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. - Gentlemen: ~r TELEPHONE 703-774- 1197 FAX NO. 703-7 74-0961 Special Exception Application This letter is written to advise that as a result of more recent conversations with the Solid Waste Management Board, Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. desires. to proceed with the amendment of its earlier Application in only one area. Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. desires only to have the buffer on the two adjoining properties reduced to 50 feet. Because of complexities, it will not be possible to construct a construction debris landfill on this site, and therefore the request for that amendment is withdrawn. Additionally, the request for 35 acres is withdrawn. Therefore, the only request still outstanding to be considered by the Board on the 28th of July is the request for a 50 foot buffer on the two adjoining properties as previously set out. Your attention to this matter would be appreciated. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~9.~.9co/l,~- EAN/sai Edward A. Natt c: Robert E. & Gladys M. Simmons 7136 Merriman Road Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 s-a James E. Chewning 7445 Starlight Lane Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 James E. and Teresa H. Chewning 7445 Starlight Lane Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 Francis & Gregory W. French 7382 Merriman Road Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 Donnie L. Dudley 5535 Arthur Street, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Roxie Ann C. Phelps 7460 Merriman Road Boones Mill, Virginia 24065 Taze H. Phelps 1630 Fairland Road, NW Roanoke, Virginia 24017 Larry E. Duncan Route 1, Box 348A Shawsville, Virginia 24162 Russell G. Creasey Route 1, Box 348A Shawsville, Virginia 24162 Cecil L. Meador 96 Oregon Avenue Ypsilanti, Michigan 48198 Don Bandy P. O. Box 4061 Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Mr. Terrance Harrington Roanoke County Planning Commission P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~~ County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terry Harrington '/• DATE: July 22, 1992 RE: Special Exception Request, Joe Bandy and Son; Modification of Conditions Attached to Existing Special Exception Permit. To purpose of this memo is to advise the Board on two additional items related to this request. The first item concerns the definition of "Construction Debris". The second item pertains to recent allegations of illegal dumping on the adjacent Bandy landf i 11. Definition of Construction Debris Mr. Bandy has requested a condition modification that would allow the landfill site to be used for "Construction Debris". During the Commission's review of this request, the discussion centered on Mr. Bandy's desire to use the site to deposit asphalt, concrete, wood and other scrap materials associated with the demolition of buildings. Virginia Department of Waste Management regulations define construction debris to include these materials and other materials such as tires, metal, and white goods (washers, dryers, stoves, etc.). Although Mr.Bandy has indicated he has no desire to deposit tires on the site, his attorney has stated that he may have an interest in accepting white goods. If the Board wishes to further restrict the nature of the materials that can be deposited on the site, you may do so by attaching additional conditions on this request. Alleged Illegal Dumping Residents of the area have reported to the County that illegal materials have been dumped on an adjacent property also owned by the applicant. This site was the location of a previous special exception issued by the Board several years ago. This special exception limits the use of this site to a "stump dump"; an area for trees, brush and other vegetation. The residents presented the County photographs that allegedly s. a showed illegally deposited materials such as wood, automobile parts, white goods, and fiberglass. My office inspected the site with the residents earlier this week. We did not see the materials shown in the photograph. The residents believe that the materials have been buried on the site. Mr. Bandy has asserted that these materials were deposited illegally by an unauthorized person, and that he has removed them from the area. Our investigation of this matter is continuing. We are receiving assistance from Mr. Olin Willis, a representative of the Virginia Department of Waste Management. Because of these two items, Mr. Bandy may request that his item be continued until your August 25, 1992 meeting. If you accept his continuation request, I request that the Board consider referring this matter back to the Planning Commission for further discussion and consideration. C: \WP51 \MEMOS\BOSBANDY S-~, PETITIONER: JOE BANDY & SON, INC. CASE NUMBER: 14-7/92 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 7, 1992 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 28, 1992 A. REQUEST Petition of Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill on approximately 75 acres, located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613), 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Marlin Thompson inquired as to the boundaries of the landfill and the kinds of construction material to be disposed. He asked if the landfill will be used by the public, and staff said that it will be open to the public. Scott Gray asked what controls will be imposed on the landfill to protect against odors, hazardous waste, water quality, etc. Ms. Scheid said that the landfill will be regulated by the state. A copy of VDWM regulations will be mailed to Mr. Gray. Taze Phelps explained that he is in the same business but on a smaller scale. He expressed concern for the road to the site and that hazardous debris would be deposited at the site. He said that he thought that people in the area don't realize what is happening. Rick Whitney said there is a need for this kind of landfill in order to ensure a longer life for the Smith Gap Landfill. He remarked that the Home Builders have expressed concern that illegal dumping may occur because of higher rates as well as travel time to Smith Gap. Cecil Meador expressed the following concerns: property devaluation; poor roads; environment; more people should be notified of the public hearing--not just adjoining property owners. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Staff pointed out that petitioner was granted a permit for this site by the Board last year and now Mr. Bandy would like to amend the conditions. The Commission asked if future requests for landfills will be referred to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for their comment. Ms. Scheid said that it would be good policy in order to obtain as much information as possible. Mr. Robinson commented that the request should be viewed as a land use issue; not an economic issue. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 35 acres. 2) Where the subject property boundary adjoins tax map parcel number 106.00-2-44 and 106- 00-2-50, there will be a 50-foot minimum buffer established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. Along all other property boundaries, a minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. s-a 3) Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 4) This landfill will be a construction and demolition debris landfill as defined by Virginia Department of Waste Management. 5) This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. 6) The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. 7) The 400-foot access road will be surface treated. 8) Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regulations regarding Countywide inspections. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. Mr. Massey stated that the public hearing had been advertised and all adjoining property owners were notified as required. He said that he will be supporting the motion. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Gordon, Massey NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker, Witt F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Te: Ro Secretary nine Commission S-a MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 1992 To: Planning Commission and Board of upervisors From: Janet Scheid, Planning Departm n Re: Special Exception Permit of Joe Bandy & Son I requested comments from John Hubbard, Executive Director of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority on the above cited permit application. I specifically asked John to comment on Mr. Bandy's request to be allowed to dispose of building construction and demolition debris in this landfill. Attached please find John's comments. ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 3433 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 (703) ?72-2130 MEMORANDUM TO: Janet Scheid Planning FROM: John R. Hubbard - ~~ Executive Director DATE: June 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Landfill Permit Amendments for Joe Bandy & Son S-a ~~~~~~~~ JUN 25 1992 PtJ~ti~lili, ZtMii~IG ~ f~fiJ ~IgKE AO',1~6'fl` I have received and reviewed your memo of June 16, 1992, concerning the landfill permit amendments for Jce Bandy & Son. I appreciate your thoughtfulness in requesting my comments. After discussion with the existing landfill operation and review of the current debris tonnage received by the landfill, it is my opinion that the diversion to Mr. Bandy's landfill could be as much as 10,000 tons per year and a loss of revenue of approximately $500,000 per year to the Resource Authority. The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is not in favor of allowing the amendment to the permit to accept building construction and demolition debris. However, the Authority would not object to allowing construction and demolition wastes generated by Mr. Bandy's work itself. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. JRH/cw s-a STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 14-7/92 PETITIONER: Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid DATE: July 7, 1992 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petition for a Special Exception Permit to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill on approximately 75 acres located off of Merriman Road (Route 613) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. b. Petitioner plans to use this site for the disposal of trees, stumps, concrete, asphalt, and building and construction debris. He estimates that approximately 35 acres of the site will be active fill over a period of time of about 20 years. c. Petitioner plans to open this landfill to the public for a fee. d. In 1991, a Special Exception Permit was issued to Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. to operate a landfill on this site. That permit imposed the following conditions: (i) Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 25 acres. (2) A minimum buffer of 400' shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. (3) Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 am to 5:30 pm, Monday through Saturday. (4) Building construction or demolition debris, such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not be permitted to be landfilled on this site. (5) This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. (6) The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. (7) The 400-foot access road will be paved. (8) Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regulations regarding County-wide inspections. Petitioner is requesting changes to Condition ~1, ,~2, and ,~4 above. After discussions with VDWM, petitioner has decided to install a liner in this landfill and will be subject to State regulations and specifications. Consequently, petitioner would like to be able to dispose of construction and building debris at this site. In order to maximize his use of this site and most effectively meet VDWM regulations petitioner would also like to increase the active landfill area from 25 acres to 35 acres and reduce the required buffer yard on the southern portion of this site from 400 feet to 50 feet. 1 S• a, 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance requires a special exception permit be approved by the governing body prior to locating a refuse landfill. The Board has requested that the Planning Commission review and make recommendations on landfill sites. The Commission can recommend and the Board approve conditions to any permit granted. b. The Virginia Department of Waste Management (VDWM) must also approve landfill proposals. The State regulations require site preparation and operation plans, minimum setbacks, hydrogeologic studies, groundwater protection measures, leachate monitoring and collection plans, surface water runoff control, access control, and final closure plans. c. Prior to construction, petitioner would be required to submit a site plan and closure plan to the County staff for administrative review to ensure compliance with all zoning ordinance regulations and special exception permit conditions. d. Erosion and sedimentation control permit will be required and enforced by Roanoke County. e. This property is currently under forestry land-use taxation. The area to be landfilled would no longer be eligible for this tax category because trees can not be planted over a capped landfill. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Mountainous terrain, severely sloping into a central basin. Soil appears to drain well. There are several streams that traverse this property. b. Ground Cover: Dense forest. Mature trees 8" - 16" in diameter with scattered pine growth in understory. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Clearbrook Community Planning Area. This area is designated for limited growth and does not receive urban services. b. General area: Petitioner owns and operates a landfill site immediately to the south. Generally, a sparsely developed rural residential area to the west and north of this site, and undeveloped properties to the east. 2 5. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. Landfill uses are not specifically listed in the Plan. Landfill sites must be located where geological conditions are most suitable but the potentially harmful effects on housing, farming, and resource protection areas must be recognized and mitigated. b. Surrounding Land: To the south is another landfill site that the petitioner owns. Directly to the northwest is one residence and farther northwest the area is sparsely developed. Directly to the southwest is one residence and farther southwest and east the area is sparsely developed. Undeveloped land is wooded. c. Neighboring Area: This is primarily a rural residential area. To the southwest is a church. d. Site Layout: VDWM regulations will control the location and extent of the fill area. An active landfill area must conform to the following distances: (1) 100' from any regularly flowing stream; (2) 200' from any well or spring used for drinking water, or any residence, school or park; (3) 50' from any public right-of-way or landfill property boundary. e. Screening and Landscape: Current permits for this site and petitioner's site south of this one, require petitioner to provide 400' buffer between fill area and property boundaries. Petitioner is requesting that he be allowed to fill within 50' of property boundary on the southern side. This southern boundary borders property owned by Mr. Bandy and property owned by other individuals. None of these properties are developed. As stated above, 50' is what the State requires and given the terrain (i.e., ridges and steep slopes) the 50' may be adequate protection. f. Amenities: Trees outside the excavation area should be retained as visual buffer and erosion control to the maximum extent possible. g. Natural Features: Steep slopes leading to a central basin. Several streams traverse the property. This site is aesthetically pleasing, diverse, and offers water quality protection and wildlife habitat. TRAFFIC h. Street Capacities: This site is located just north of Simmonds Gap, approximately one mile north of the Roanoke 3 County-Franklin County border. Access is from Merriman Road (VA 613). VA 613 had an average daily traffic county of approximately 250 in 1986. i. Circulation: Petitioner has indicated his intentions to open this landfill site to the public. The entrance will be protected with a controlled gatehouse where the load will be inspected and a fee collected. Petitioner has indicated that trip ends per day are very variable but estimates a maximum of 30 per day. VDWM regulations require all weather access roads leading to a landfill facility as well as to the disposal area. The 1991 permit states that the 400' access road must be paved and the gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. UTILITIES j. Water and Sewer: Nearest private well and septic system is approximately 0.1 mile to the north from the property boundary. No public water or sewer is available to this area. i}RAINAGE k. Basin: Proposed active fill site is located on top of a tributary in the Back Creek Drainage basin. Back Creek drains into the Roanoke River below the Roanoke River gorge and above Smith Mt. Lake. 1. Floodplain: Site is not within the 100-year floodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES m. Fire and Rescue Service: Proposed site is not within established service area. ENVIRONMENT n. Air: Access roads may generate excessive amounts of dust. Control can be accomplished through sprinkling. o. Water: VDWM will require an extensive network of groundwater monitoring wells and leachate holding tanks. As stated earlier, no active landfill area is to be located within 100' of any regularly flowing stream or within 500' of any well or spring used for drinking water. p. Soils: VDWM requires no steeper than a 3 to 1 slope. County will require and soil and erosion control permit. that controls 4 " ~^~"'1 q. Noise: VDWM requires that the noise levels be below 80 dB(A) when measured at the property boundary. r. Signage: as per ordinance for A-1 district. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve. The petitioner's proposal can be deemed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan provided: (1) VDWM regulations are strictly adhered to and strictly enforced in the design and operation of the landfill, and (2) All conditions that may be recommended by the Planning Commission are imposed by the Board of Supervisors. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposed use is subject to VDWM regulations and to all conditions imposed through the Special Exception permitting process; (2) Requested reduction in buffer from 400' to 50' - this change would affect two properties. One of these properties is owned by the petitioner and both pieces are currently undeveloped; (3) Petitioner is now proposing to install a liner and cap. These features will add to the safety of this facility; (4) The finished, capped landfill can potentially provide usable open space for recreational purposes, i.e., a park or golf course, at some point in the future. b. Weaknesses: (1) Truck traffic volume and noise levels are highly variable and difficult to predict; (2) The capped landfill will result in the loss of forestry resources which provide ground water protection and wildlife habitat. c. Recommended Conditions - Retain the following conditions from the 1991 permit: (1) Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 am to 5:30 pm, Monday through Saturday; (2) Site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County; (3) The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613; (4) The 400-foot access road will be paved; (5) Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regulations regarding County-wide inspections. In addition add the following conditions: (6) Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 35 acres; (7) Where the subject property boundary adjoins tax map parcel number 106.00-2-44 and 106.00-2-50 there will be a 50-foot minimum buffer established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary; (8) Along all other property boundaries a minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. 5 ROANOKE COONTY -- ~ , •• APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE 1. Applicant's Name: Joe Bandy E Son, Inc. Phone: 342-5187 Address: P. O. Box 4061 Roanoke, VA Zip: 24015 2. Property owner's name Same as above Address: Phone: Zip: 3. Location of Property: Masons Knob, County of Roanoke Size of property 74.86 acres/sgcx~.t. Sizes of proposed special exception use 74.86 acres/. 4 . Tax Map # : 106-2-64 E 106-2-49 Old Tax Map # 5. Zoning Classification: A-1 ---- - -- - 6. Magisterial District Location: Cave ring -_ - 7. Existing Land Use: Vacant 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: Operation of the sanitary f i I I method garbage and refuse site (stump dump and inert material landfill) 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural reserve 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: lJnknovK~ Value of Land 62,100 Value of Proposed Buildings -0- Value of Machinery & Tools ~~~ Number to be Employed ~~10~"n 11. Check Completed Items: X -- 81t" x 11" plot plan - X Consultation - r •:~~,.~. X List of adjacent property owners ~_ Letter of Application ~¢• - • X Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $1,875 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill _ method garbage and refuse site $40 All other Special Exception Uses 12. Date of Application: 5/20/92 _ JOE BANDY 6 SON, INC. (~ „ - 13. Applicant's Signature: By Edward A. Natt, its Attorney (~ a O,- - .iARLES H. OSTERMOUOT MICHAEL S. FERGUSON EDWARD A. MATT MICHAEL J. AHERON O. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD OSTE RHOU DT, LAW OFFICES FERGU.SON, NATT, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W. P. O. BOX 20068 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 May 20, 1992 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Joe Bandy & Son, Inc., Request for Special Exception Gentlemen: AHERON €~ AGEE au.' TELEPHONE 703.7 74.1 197 iAX NO. 703-7 74-0061 This letter is written on behalf of my client, Joe Bandy & Son, Inc., in support of its application for a special exception use- to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill on its property situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The property is located off of Merriman Road (Route 613) and contains approximately 75 acres. The Board of Supervisors granted a special exception permit for this property on October-22nd, 1991. A copy ~f the resolution granting the same is attached hereto. Since that time, Mr. Bandy has had extensive conversations with the Virginia Department of Waste Management and, as a result thereof, is requesting some amendments to the previously granted special excep~ion use permit. In his initial conversations with the Virginia Department of Waste Management, and in his first appearance before the Board of Supervisors, it was not anticipated that a liner would be required or placed on the site. As a result, Mr. Bandy planned only to use the site for the disposal of trees, stumps, concrete and asphalt. Since that time, the Virginia Department of Waste Management has indicated that a liner would be required on the site. With this in mind, Mr. Bandy would like to request an amendment to his permit to provide that construction debris can be disposed of on the site. The liner, as required by the Virginia Department of Waste Management, will adequately insure that there is no pollution to the soil. The facility will have a liner, ground water monitoring well and a leachate collection system to insure the safety of the soil. Any leachate collected will be collected in tanks and disposed of at the sewage treatment plant. In addition to the above amendment, Mr: Bandy would like to request two additional changes in the permit. They are as follows: 1. That the 400 foot buffer be reduced to 50 feet from Point A on the attached map to Point B on the attached map. The reason for this is the topography and the grading which will be required on site. An on-site inspection of the premises would be most beneficial to see how this buffer will be sufficient to protect the adjoining property. 2. It is requested that the area to be utilized for land fill purposes be increased from 25 to 35 acres. This does not mean that all 35 acres would be used at any time but, because of the grading required, the maximum potential available site would be the 35 acres. The Petitioner would respectfully request that this matter be considered favorably by the Board of Supervisors. We are aware of the additional permitting requirements imposed in the special exception for sanitary fill garbage and refuse sites and we are willing to comply with those. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. Edwar-dA. Natt EAN/bp Encl. cc: Don Bandy Joe Bandy & Son P. 0. Box 4061 Roanoke, VA 24015 .~' __ _ ~~ SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION For The SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE PERMIT To Operate a SANITARY FILL METHOD GARBAGE & REFUSE SITE DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE TYPES OF FOREIGN MATERIAL WHICH WILL BE INVOLVED IN ANY LANDFILL OR DUMPING OPERATION. Tree sturps, rock and concrete and asphalt demolition ebris DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSED METHOD FOR COVERING THE FOREIGN MATERIAL DESCRIBED ABOVE. Dirt and fill material - Linea wi I I be instal led meeting yf7MA Star,darcic - '~ HO+. LONG DO YOU ANTICIPATE THE PROPOSED OPERATION TO CONTINUE? --20 ears _ - - __ _ - WHO WILL MAINTAIN CONTROL AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE OPERATION? Joe Bandy i; Son Inc a Virginia cornQration rr~ : .. ~;~" _.S, ~.. .~-- A~. ~J ~`J / !• ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~._ ~- °/~ i`O~. CGC~ ARP yam. co ,, °',% . ~, ~ •. ."`ANC ~, . ..~ .~T: ,•: ,:,~ "i t ^+ ,att.}t.;~, ..~6~ .Q ~: ~v , s ~'. r ., 0 ~ , ('+ , ~,' . ' ~ 3 ~j ~' ti~ °s q 8 ! I ~ ~ y .P i 85 • L ... l.~:i `E'li *~ 8~c rO' s i ..~ ,~'~ ~~-,~ ~, { 1 ~,i~ 1~ ~.i~'V~ ` sN~ p. T •~.'\. ., 11 / ~` ' y ' ~tl(' ,,1'~ '" }. 54`0 ~Ir .~ ~ ~3 qc (1. • ,.f ~ p~~*. ~{ti+*~~~ ~Y 't ~~~r + •~ ~x ~ C ' i ~C 9 !' ~' E i ~-7 J~{Y,,~t ~ . t ~ t •~` ; - ``" ` .,~ 390 ' + •~r , t •..t a +., ~ t .. ,fir`. ~ g 9 ••t 7 ::~1~ ,"'V! O ~ (~ ~p$ i ;. ., .. ~ ~ / ~ r~ ~ i- ~_ 8 't S/(o,5' 39--2 ~':t,' y _ _ `' 6~ q ~ r•. ~1$c.1I t~ . 5 JJ ,}d.~ .. M ~~Y~, + ' 8 ~~,, ~ , ~~ ~, "" ~' -. :fir ~' 3• ; ~ ., J`~d 283: - , ` ,y i ~ ~~~lii/~ve~ ,~ /5.~5~K, ,.~,~~':' ~ t,• ~.•.,,1, ti ''s,~hrlr;°r. . ~,o/ /~ C , tie.,: :; .~ , c ~L ~ T ~s,yo~,viiv~ ~~a~~2 Ty oc _ __ ,Qom N oK c Cov~ry , ~//2 Go i~/~.q .3GA LE / "- -yGoc ' ,D /4 TC ; -~~/L )' L 5~ i 9 91 - 1 ~ i r ,.., .. ~,,;1 ~ ; ~o ~'`0' ''~`~; 1-, ~~~ - ~:~, ~~ ~~ ~~,; ,.,~~~, ~ ~ ;' y- '' i O .J _~ ~ .- ~; ~~` ~ . ,~ ";~ \~ `~ • t ~~~}•.~ ~~ ~- ~;/- .~~ ~, /~ ``~ it << ;~I r~~ (C .i~': ~ 1 ~ ':~ a V ~ .. ~~ ~,. -~~ ~~ ~ ~ , ~ :, ~ ;,.~ ~ ~ ` ,, ~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ / -- ~ ~~~~ 1 ~~~ ,~ ` ~ /~/iii ~ --1. • _ _. j, ~' ~a L o ~ iC'~f L ~1~9 P ~ l~ ~~ 1``Di2 Jac ~3 /~~~.o ~~ ~ , ~~~ f~ ,r~~ ~ . ~. ~T..,.y~ T ~_~ ~,._.-.~--~-- ..1. ~,..T_•l1-l Y/ 1 1-... ..-i.r--1 _'Y-F -:- -~ ;_`_ 1 ._.._ _, _ -- _. _T-rS_-TZ--~_.r 1 ~- i 1 T j ! 1 I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 - ~ rT i -r -,- r~ ~_~''__~~_ ~.i._+._a. _ :J -ri- 1 ..T.,-~_t.T.r~ --_'.~-~---r-+- ' art- ~ ~, ~/ ' I~ I 1 1 I I - 1 1 1 ----~ ' ~_ 1~ 1 ~~ + -- 1 ~" , ~ "1_. T..r ~ ~ It'll.... _.~1 ~ ~ ~"'}yL' 1 i ' ~~~~ 1---.-y ~- ^ _T rt- - ~ ~ 1 ' I ~~ __~r.~. 1 i 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 X11 1f _ ..,~~ I r 1~ ..~ 1 I i'' 1 I 1 1. ~ 1 ' I ' L' ~'.. I~' LT 1 ~T~ 1 i ~'~ ! I • 1 ~' . I 1 1 1 } l i, t' 1 ' 1~_ _ 1 •--4 1 ,~ . 1 1 {~ 1 1 ~ { 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~~ l = I l ~ 1 .. 1 J ~ ! I ~~ .~~y.y~u.{.. 1 . ~ . { ~ 1 1 II I 1 ~.~.~...~ ~_ 1 I ~ 1.3-; T Y ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ '- ~ i .~ 1 1 i I I 1 1 •~ ~•n.~ I 1 1' I I i ~ 1 ~TT I I I I I I 1 1 I .~ ^ 1 I i I ! 1 1 ' I i I 1 -~-~ ' 1 1 1 1 1 V I I 1 1 l i l i I 1 ' ~ l i .7.. 1 1 I 1 1 ' I 1 1 1 r ~ I I l i~ j 1 I . I%1 ~ ~ " t ~ 1 I 1 • i , ~~ ~ 1 1 i I 1 I I T ~ 1 1 I ! i t 1 i 1 ; 1 1 1. I 1 1 II j i I! i 1 1 1 t I I 1 I i i i 1 1 I i- I 1 I i i I I i 1 I 1 t 1 1 I ; T 1 1 ~~ } I l.y.l ~I ; I l i i i ~ ! ~~ 1 i t i I I - 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ; ~ 1 1 I~ i 1 1 l~ i i 1 1 1' 1 , 1 1 I~ 1 • 1~ , l 1, 1 1 y : l l I l I 1 1 1 ! ' 1 '~.: ' ! 1 ~'-i-r*- I 1 i I I ~~ t 1 3 I ~ i l 1 1 t x !! : 1 1 b I I I 1 1 I t r'~ 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 I+t 1 1~_ -~ T I_~ Iy i~ 1 1 1 ~yy~ ; l , ? . : , 1 . 1 -.rte 1 , 1 1 1 ! l ~^`r~ S ` ~ . ~ I' 1 ' _ i I I i J.. ' ; f 1 i~ ' _ ~ ~ ~y ` ~ _ ~ , _ i i ; i I - ~ 1 X 1 1 ~ 1 1 ' 1 1 ! +~^ I '1 1 r I l . 1 I i r I ~~~,~~~L -~-!--i- I -T~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~' ~ ~ I { j ~ T j i I 1 1 ~ •• 1 i _y ; r.~ _ __. __ _ .t, ~ l • , ~~ ~ L + ~~ ~- i-+ ~ 1 , + y T -~ 1 ' _~+. r._ {__ 1 1.r mil - . 1 T ~' I 1 i 1 ' 1 'T~~T - 1 I _ y1..~.~'~...r.-y. I i ` - j ~•~1- 1 I 1 ' r~ ! ~1_ 1 1 I 1 ' ~t j _ I'~ , I I~ _ l r ~-1 _ ~ , _ -~~ ~ 1 - r -- - ~~ 1 ~ ~ I I i ~ I , I 1 1+ _ _ _ I I I , I f 1 i ~ 1 ~ ~ , i -T ~_ ~ -~ 1 ~~1 - ~ '~- '- ' _~ ~ -v ~~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~-1- -F•- ~~ YT 1i ,~_y~_ ~~~ I I(~ ; ys,rt.~.~.y~~ ~.1 ^--r-^T-_ - ~ ' ~~t ' I~ ~ 1 ~ ~ „ ~~. i .: i rT~ I - ~ 11 r 1--+- I 1`+ = ' ~--+~-r-i-!-T I . -•~... ..fir. -r 1 --t--i-1--IT 1 - -} i T-;-7-: 1 ~ r'~_~..f 1 _ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT_ UNTY ADMINISTRATION-CENTER O1~ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1991 RESOLIITION 102291-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO JOE BANDY i SON INC. TO OPERATE A BTIIMP AND CONSTRIICTION DEBRIS LANDFILL ON A 74.86 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD (ROIITE 613) 800 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH TOKEN ROAD (ROIITE 684, CAPE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter October 22, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special ---exception permit-far--the-~-ocation and operation of a stump an3- construction debris andfill is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Joe Bandy & Son Inc. to operate a stump and construction debris landfill on a 74.86 acre tract of land located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route E13; 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a. Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 25 acres. b. A minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. C~ E ~° -;~ ~_ ~~ c. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. d. Building construction or demolition debris, such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not be permitted to be landfilled on this site. e. This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a penait is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. f. The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. g. The 400-foot access road will be paved. h. Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regula- tions regarding County-wide inspections. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt__ ordinance_ _with_ ____ additional conditions that 400 foot access road will be paved and petitioner will agree to abide by any future regulations regarding county-wide inspections, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney; County Attorney I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of -Resolution 102291-12 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on October 22, 1991 Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors -'UcLISnc~.'S rtE - ~ii7.lu - C:Jwn(~V - ~.µTT 1919 tL_i,TrZIt, ;<l; Sn f(OM~VUIt C STHTE OF vi:~~I~~I:+ CITY CF tur,iv~lc VA Z4G13 aFFii:NV1T CF NUCLiC~+TICN lr ITnE ~.,:.Jtr"cSIvrvEO) ~N rUinuKILEG ncr%rlcSctvT,~T I vc CF THt T il"cJ-nGr:Lu ~un- ~iJi<aTIJnr ~~HICn CuriPUt<.,TI~J~v I~ PUoLI~F-cri OF TnE ttur-I`OnE TIhtcS ~ n~:KLU-iVtr~.ir N uriILY ~~C/1Jf tir:'Z PUCLISi1E;, liV Kur~vt)ntr iN THE aT,~TE CF ,~ irZulivIrlr JC CcnTTrY_. Tnr+T TL .+iV1~CXCU ,~VTIi.t Wr{S rl,dLl~f1CJ l.v J~+IU ,PF+PErtJ U''~ Trc ruLL~.:rvI~+~ u~TE:, 1C/C5/~1 1;;R~I'v~ i. EvLf~1r~U 10/1/91 ~1JRr~I~~li ~ EV rtvIw~ rtiTrJESjr THIS 1.`,Tn G~.Y CF ~CTuuEr. 1571 _ ~• IEGAI NOTItE • • % ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD r• ,~~ ------~~? r- `-~'` I ~'~ ~~~'% '~• ~~ ~~ --'~'~-`-s`•`"~•"-~"~"'~~ OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke~Covnty Board of SuparvlsorswlllholdaDUblle __ r/ (! L ~/ T f L; U N T U K C ~ 1 ~ hesrlnp at 7 p.m. on TuasdaY. r ~ v~ v October 27. 19x1, In the Com- munNY Room of the Roanoke Cevnty Administration Cen- far, 373 BramDleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, an the petition Of Joe Bandy 6 SOn, Inc. for a SDedal Use Permit to operate e ftUTD and COn31NUl0n de-I brie landfill on a 74.16 acre tract located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613), a00 feet north o1 Its Int1r- section with Token Rosd (ROUt• 6!1 ), Cave SDrlnp Maglsterlel DI{1rICt. A coDY of this epDlicatlon Is available for Inspection in the Department Of Planning and I Zenlnp, 37~ Snmblafon AvM nua. Raanoka, VA. Dated: October l 1991 Mary M. Allen, Clerk i (60) ti ~.. A ~e p W •, M ICI tb IL10Ae~ 10.OrM0 N.nk01 20A1Aefq E ~ ~ p-' .f3ka 3t fA6A~ ~ _ •• / SA6Ae ~tA0te0 I IbuM C1 ~J ~l L llllll /I S- NORTH 9 5t s1.0oAe bl it.NMq i0 i.~ +1 b0 . ZNr ~ 10.10b i+anrti. , A ~ $ a awr,- a ~ 4S ~~ ~latAe lgACO ~ 1 tAtActy X00 k N.~lAe 44 ~ `. OOAOM ~m k A1XC N- ~~~ ~J • sr ~~.3 ~ 3SJ w.. 3S3 w t 00 k 10.00 k ' i X7.2 ~ N.09 Ao ~2.t 1.!! At ~ .---- - COlV11KUN1?'YSBRVICBS sloe Sandy & Son,Inc ANDDBVBLOPMBNT 1~6-2-64 lOb-2-49 ~oecial Exception ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 102291-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JOE BANDY & SON INC. TO OPERATE A STUMP AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS LANDFILL ON A 74.86-ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD (ROUTE 613) 800 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH TOKEN ROAD (ROUTE 684), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on October 22, 1991, the Board of Supervisors granted a special exception permit for the location and operation of a stump and construction debris landfill on a 74.86 acre tract of land located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613) 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. has filed a petition to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill at the same location with amended the conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 7, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter July 28, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special exception permit for the location and operation of a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1 S-a. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Joe Bandy & Son Inc. to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill on approximately 75 acres of land located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613) 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following amended conditions: a. Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than ~-5 3 5 acres . b. Where the subiect property boundary adjoins tax map parcel number 106 00-2-44 and 106.00-2-50, there will be a 50-foot minimum buffer established from any portion of fill area to any point on the prop- erty boundary Along all other property bound- aries, a minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be estab- lished from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. c. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. d. i~ e~~,..u'rr-ccir~e~6€-ii~~-`~ ,~ ~ ti• ^ i ^ ; ~. } ^,~ ~e-~-~~~r~^~~t~i~s-~ : This 1 a nd f i 11 w i 11 be a construction and demolition debris landfill as defined by Virginia Department of Waste Management. e. This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. 2 S-2~ f. The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. g. The 400-foot access road will be wed surface treated. h. Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regula- tions regarding County-wide inspections. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\bandy 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT UNTY ADMINISTRATION-CENTER ON- -~ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1991 RESOLOTION 102291-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO JOE HANDY 8 SON INC. TO OPERATE A BTIIMP AND CONSTRQCTION DEBRIS LANDFILL ON A 74.86 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD (ROIITE 613) 800 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH TOKEN ROAD (ROIITE 684), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a public hearing on this matter October 22, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special exception permit-for the-~Tocation and operation of a stump an3 construction debris andfill is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Joe Bandy & Son Inc. to operate a stump and construction debris - landfill on a 74.86 acre tract of land located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route E13) 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a. Active landfilling will not be conducted on more than 25 acres. b. A minimum buffer of 400 feet shall be established from any portion of fill area to any point on the property boundary. -Y- }- ~~ c. Operating hours shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. d. Building construction or demolition debris, such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not be permitted to be landfilled on this site. e. This site will not be utilized as a landfill until a permit is received from VDWM and copy of such submitted to the County. f. The gatehouse will not be visible from Route 613. g. The 400-foot access road will be paved. h. Petitioner agrees to abide by any future regula- tions regarding County-wide inspections. On motion of Supervisor Robers to adopt__ordinance with additional conditions that 400 foot access road will be paved and petitioner will agree to abide by any future regulations regarding county-wide inspections, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None -~ A COPY TESTE: ~4~ Mary H ~ Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ' -John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney; County Attorney I hereby certify that the foregoing is a Resolution 102291-12 adopted by the ~ Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote I ~ ~,t~ Mary H. lien, Roanoke County true and correct copy of toanoke County Board of on October 22, 1991 C~-~ = ~/ Clerk Board of Subervi ;ors lUiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~~ _ _ - ~ - - ~ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - APPEARANCE RE VEST s -~ _ _ Q - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. s ~ a- _ - _ - = SUBJECT , ~ ~ g ~ ~ ©y ~ s oro , z,v c. _ _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to __ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed bythe majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c = with the clerk. c c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii111 S!~ July 28, 1992 To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Subject: Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. petition for landfill In reviewing Resolution 10'1291-12 granting a special use permit for the subject landfill after a public hearing on October 22, 1991, there are several questions about terminology and content. 1. The terminology i.n the resolution does not correspond with the 1988 Department of Waste Management Regulations pertaining to landfills. There is no such entity as a "stump and construction debris landfill". In the Regulations this would be called a "Construction/Debr.is landfill". Also, paragraph 2.d. states, "Building construction or demolition debris, such as lumber, drywall, and roofing will not be permitted to be landfilled on this site." What construction debris is allowed if all these are excluded from the landfill? 2. I was told by Roanoke County Planning Commission staff that this resolution allowed the landfill to be open to the public with gatehouse to collect fees. Where does the resolution state that the landfill is open to the public"? Also, i.f the landfill is open to the public, how can Mr. Bandy post No-Trespassing signs? This seems like a conflict in terms. 3. The request on June 15, 1992 for a Special Use Permit to operate a "sanitary fill stump dump" and "inert material landfill" are also words that do not appear in the Regulations. The words sanitary, fill, and dump never appear. The word "stump" is catagorized under Debris Waste, and "inert material" is referred to as Inert Waste. This is not merely a matter of semantics because in this important Resolution, it would seem appropriate to use exact words from the Regulations so they could not be misconstrued or open to interpretation. Page 1 of 2 4. When does Mr. Bandy want his petition heard? In a letter dated July 23, 1992, from Mr. Bandy to Mr. Harrington, it requests "that this meeting be delayed for an indefinite period of time", but in referencing his letter, Janet Scheid said, "until the August 25th public hearing". Which time is correct? It is understood that Mr. Bandy has withdrawn the request for a Construction/Demolition/Debris Landfill and returned to a Debris Waste term meaning stumps, wood, brush, and leaves from land clearing operations. This would eliminate a major problem for the citizens, but we do not want the landfill open to the public because of traffic hazards from dump trucks and because private landfills in the county take money away from the taxpayer- funded Smith Gap landfill that has been approved by all cognizant governmental bodies. We would prefer to have the landfill closed permanently, but if you let your resolution stand, we request that an organized citizen's group we are forming be allowed to have specific representatives (whose names will be given to Mr. Bandy, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors) inspect the the landfill at any time during normal business hours. Sincerely, yrLQf~Q~;; /'*' Marlin H. Thompson MHT/tj Page 2 of 2 JULY 17, 1992 I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CONCERNING MR. BANDY'S PETITION FOR CHANGES TO THE HIGHWAY 613 LANDFILL ON JULY 28, BUT I WISH TO EXPRESS MY OPPOSITION TO THE REQUESTED CHANGES. ~~~~ -4-.3G' ~~~ ~ -S E ~ -~ ~~ ~- - ~ ~ ~~ r ~_ ., ,r ~„~ .fir,( ~ , ' ~_Si~~ ~, l._ 33~ _S ~ ~~ ~•~~i ~~2~~~ ~~y ~~1; ~~ .. 52Z^ ~~~ ~~ ~S•~ rb 3y~ ,~-~' NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE '1 II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ' a APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~~ ~ ` I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS PHONE I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 -~ m©~~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-10 AMENDING AND READOPTING ARTICLE I "IN GENERAL," OF CHAPTER 21 "TAXATION" OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 21-8 "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR TAX COLLECTION BY LEGAL ACTION" WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3958 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes a local governing body to impose on delinquent taxpayers a fee to cover administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes; and, WHEREAS, the Treasurer of Roanoke County has recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt such an ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines that the adoption of this ordinance is in the public interest since it places a portion of the costs of collection upon those individuals requiring such collection actions; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 1992; and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 28, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That Article I. "IN GENERAL" of Chapter 21. "TAXATION" of the Roanoke County Code, is hereby amended and readopted by the addition of a new section as follows: Section 21-8. Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Lectal Action There is hereby imposed upon the person or persons owing any tax levied by the County a fee to cover the administrative costs 1 associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. This fee shall be in the amount of Twenty ($20.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to the filing of a warrant or other appropriate legal document but prior to judgment, and Twenty-Five ($25.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. Such fee shall be in addition to all penalties and interest. Nothing in this ordinance shall foreclose the County's collection of additional or higher fees and costs, where allowed by general law of the Commonwealth. 2) That the effective date of this ordinance shall be from and after July 28, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens cc: File Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompetere, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Larcuri, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Bwkart, Commomvealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krant7/Betty Perry A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Chwch Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheritf John M. Chambliss, Jn, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER 1 - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Amending and Readopting Article I "In General" of Chapter 21, "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code by the Addition of a New Section 21-8 "Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Legal Action" COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Code of Virginia authorizes the imposition of a delinquent taxpayers fee that covers administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. This fee would place collection costs upon the delinquent taxpayer and remove some of the burden of the cost from the taxpayer who pays his taxes in a timely manner. This would cover the extra ordinary cost associated with delinquent collections. The proposed fee is $20.00 for taxes collected subsequent to the filing of a warrant or other appropriate legal document but prior to judgment, and $25.00 for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. FISCAL IMPACT Based on 2,000 delinquent accounts, it is estimated that this fee will generate $40,000 in revenue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be adopted following Second Reading and Public Hearing on July 28, 1992. i red C. A derson County Treasurer Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~_ 1 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Tr AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING ARTICLE I "IN GENERAL," OF CHAPTER 21 "TAXATION" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 21-8 "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR TAX COLLECTION BY LEGAL ACTION" WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3958 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes a local governing body to impose on delinquent taxpayers a fee to cover administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes; and, WHEREAS, the Treasurer of Roanoke County has recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt such an ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines that the adoption of this ordinance is in the public interest since it places a portion of the costs of collection upon those individuals requiring such collection actions; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 1992; and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 28, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That Article I. "IN GENERAL" of Chapter 21. "TAXATION" of the Roanoke County Code, is hereby amended and readopted by the addition of a new section as follows: Section 21-8. Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Lectal Action There is hereby imposed upon the person or persons owing any tax levied by the County a fee to cover the administrative costs •f 1 associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. This fee shall be in the amount of Twenty ($20.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to the filing of a warrant or other appropriate legal document but prior to judgment, and Twenty-Five ($25.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. Such fee shall be in addition to all penalties and interest. Nothing in this ordinance shall foreclose the County's collection of additional or higher fees and costs, where allowed by general law of the Commonwealth. 2) That the effective date of this ordinance shall be from and after July 28, 1992. c:\wp57\agenda\general\taxrn4fee e AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4616 LAYMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 40.04-1-58) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTHA C. CHINAULT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 23, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 28, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 7, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .9 acre, as described herein, and located at 4616 Layman Road, (Tax Map Number 40.04-1-58) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Martha C. Chinault. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of Glade Creek at a point where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of State Route No. 606 and said point being 25 feet north of the said center line of State Route No. 606; thence running along the northerly right-of- ~. . r way line of Route No. 606 and being 25 feet north and parallel to the said center line of same a distance of 440 feet, more or less, to a point where said highway right-of-way line intersects the easterly right-of-way line of the N&W Railway Company and said point being 40 feet east of the said center line of the easternmost track; thence along the easterly right-of-way line of said railway company 40 feet east and parallel to the center line of the easternmost track 130 feet, more or less, to a point in said right-of-way line where same intersects the center line of Glade Creek; thence leaving the railway company's right-of-way line and running down the center line of Glade Creek 305 feet, more or less, with the meanders thereof to a point in center line of Glade Creek where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of Route No. 606, the point of Beginning, and containing 0.90 acre, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney T-a PETITIONER: MARTHA CHINAULT CASE NUMBER: 13-7/92 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 7, 1992 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 28, 1992 A. REQUEST Petition of Martha C. Chinault to rezone .9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to allow continuation and expansion of an existing residential use, located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mrs. Dowdy who owns the nearby farm inquired about the zoning of her property. The Commission said that her property has not been rezoned for industrial use. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Massey said that the request is a housekeeping matter and moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Gordon, Massey NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker, Witt F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other _.L..~-~~-,.. Terrance Harrington, S cretary Roanoke County Pla ing Commission STATF REIaORT - "'~""~ CASE NUMBER: 13-7/92 REVIEWED BY: LYNN DONIHE PETITIONER: MARTHA CHINAULT DATE: JULY 7, 1992 Petition of Martha C. Chinault to rezone 0.9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to allow continuation and expansion of an existing residential use, located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner requests rezoning in order to eliminate a nonconforming, situation. There is a sixty-Year old single-family house on this pro~erry, zoned for industnal use. The petitioner is trying to sell this property and the potential purchaser would like to expand the house. This expansion ~ro~ect cannot be undertaken because the house in a nonconforming use in the industrial distnct. b. This site is not within an identified industrial site. The Department of Economic Development states that this request is not in conflict with the Economic Development Strategy. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-2 Heavy Industrial district permits a variety of manufacturing, processing, and assembling uses, as well as warehousing, contractors' equipment yards, concrete and steel plants, and automobile body shops. b. The proposed R-1 single-family residential district permits single family dwellings, schools, churches, and other similar community and civic uses. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Site is gently sloping up from Layman Road. GROUND COVER: Residential landscaping, garden area, and wooded area. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Bonsack Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stimulate growth. Area is within the urban sernce limits, although urban services are not available. GENERAL AREA is agricultural with some large lot single-family residential uses. Many of the properties in the area that abut the railway have a portion of the site zoned M-2 but have a history of agriculture and residential use. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 =positive impact, 2 =negligible impact, 3 =manageable impact, 4 =disruptive impact, S =severe impact, and N/A =not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Surface Water and Flood Hazard designation. The Plan encourages protection of floodplain areas and natural drainage courses. A major portion of the site is located within the 100 year f}t~~?d plain. ""'~~ ~ 2 1 SURROUNDING LAND: Site is bordered on the northwest by the N&S Railway, on the south by Layman Road, and on the northeast by Glade Creek. Properties across these boundaries are agricultural and residential. Continued use of this site as residential is more compatible with the area than industrial uses. 1 NEIGHBORING AREA: See "surrounding land." 2 SITE LAYOUT: Existing single-family dwelling appears to be located outside of the 100 year floodplain limits. 2 ARCHITECTURE: Existing wood sided dwelling. N/A SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: N/A AMENITIES: 2 NATURAL AMENITIES: Site is bordered by Glade Creek on the northeast. The VA Department of Forestry recommends that a buffer of existing trees and vegetation be retained along the creek to protect the water quality. TRAFFIC 2 STREET CAPACITIES and CIRCULATION: No change. UTILITIES 2 WATER and SEWER Existing well and septic. No change. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Glade Creek drainage basin. 2 FLOODPLAIN: A portion of the property lies within the limits of the 100 year floodplain, as shown on FEMA maps. The actual limits of this floodplain will have to be identified if any future expansion of the dwelling occurs and all improvements to the site must be in accord with the floodplain ordinance. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE PROTECTION: No chapge. Within established service standard. 2 RESCUE: No change. Not within established service area. N/A PARKS AND RECREATION: N/A SCHOOLS: PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Surface Water and Flood Hazard. The existing dwelling does not ap~eaz to be located wnthin the FEMA 100 year floodplain, althouggh a major portion of the site is within those limits. Any expansion must conform to applicable Fooodplain Ordinance requirements. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: (1) The site has been used for residential purposes for sixty years. The neighborhood is residential and agricultural in nature. (2) The azea is not one identified by the Department of Economic Development as a prime industrial area or site. The request is not in conflict with the Econ~mc Development Strategy. ' , ~ a C~'~ Date Rec.: ~t 'd ~~~ Received By: _ ~~ ~S, CAGp <A~J~~ Case No.. w ~ I - Ord. No. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: ,• iii /iu f Address : ~~~~ ~/~~.OIR,E y ~/l ~ ~`G ~(A~~Os Nab rssc~~.o ~(~- . Phone :~1~.3' ~7~' yC 7~ f ~ ~~'Sd l 2. Applicant's Name: 5,~.~ Z Phone: Address: 3. Location of Property: '/Si~ ck Tax Map Number(s) : ~{(~. 04- l- S~~ 4 . Magisterial District.: ~G ~ ~, ~ ~~ 5. Size of Property: ~~-t ,~c,. 6. Existing Zoning:_~_ Existing Land Use: ~~s~c~~cgl - SrN~~z~ ~_~,~,~~( 7. Proposed Zoning: ~~-~ Proposed Land Use: (~~~~, c~~,~.1-~~i~ ( - S ~~c,, ( z ~,o..t ~ ~~/ --- ~K~.~~ lJ~~, 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 1 )~~~r ~ ~ ~;~{~,~I` 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No ,/ (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: C, k ti} A Letter of Application _~ Concept Plan ~ ~~ ~ Z Metes and Bounds Description ,/ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map ~~ c~ Application Fee ~_ Written Proffers ~A ~~~tn ~ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) ~J~ 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: ' ` <• S ignature ~~`1~ •~- •~-~~ Date ~ ~~~ > ~ Ta MEMORANDUM Date: May 27, 1992 To: Offices Reviewing Rezoning Petitions From: Janet Scheid, Planning Department Re: Martha Chinault Rezoning Petition The above mentioned petition is to rezone a piece of residential property from Industrial M-1 to Residential R-1. There is a 60 year old single family house on this property. The petitioner is trying to sell this property and the potential purchaser would like to expand the house. This expansion project can not be undertaken because the house is a nonconforming use in the industrial district. Thus, the request to rezone. The Economic Development Department does not have any problems with this site being rezoned to residential. ~r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4616 LAYMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 40.04-1-58) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTHA C. CHINAIILT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 23, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 28, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 7, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .9 acre, as described herein, and located at 4616 Layman Road, (Tax Map Number 40.04-1-58) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Martha C. Chinault. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of Glade Creek at a point where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of State Route No. 606 and said point being 25 feet north of the said center line of State Route No. 606; thence running along the northerly right-of- ~~ way line of Route No. 606 and being 25 feet north and parallel to the said center line of same a distance of 440 feet, more or less, to a point where said highway right-of-way line intersects the easterly right-of-way line of the N&W Railway Company and said point being 40 feet east of the said center line of the easternmost track; thence along the easterly right-of-way line of said railway company 40 feet east and parallel to the center line of the easternmost track 130 feet, more or less, to a point in said right-of-way line where same intersects the center line of Glade Creek; thence leaving the railway company's right-of-way line and running down the center line of Glade Creek 305 feet, more or less, with the meanders thereof to a point in center line of Glade Creek where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of Route No. 606, the point of Beginning, and containing 0.90 acre, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\chinault O~ pOANp,I.~ a ti p z ~ 2 a 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Cn~~x~# ~#' ~~xY~.C~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Mrs. Mikeiel T. Wimmer 3878 Harborwood Road Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mrs. Wimmer: July 28, 1992 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board for a four-year term. Your new term will expire on July 31, 1996. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, '.~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board LBE/bj h Enclosures cc: John H, Parrott, Chairman Jeffrey Cromer, Disposal Manager of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper 0~ pOANp~.~ a ~ ~ ~ z ~ 38 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN (703) 772-2004 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT July 2 8, 19 9 2 HowNS MAGISTER L DHISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Wayne Gauldin 6032 Newport Road Catawba, VA 24070 Dear Mr. Gauldin: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission for complete the unexpired three-year term of Fenton E. Harrison, Jr. This term will expire June 30, 1994. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Lee B. Eddy, Chai an Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bjh Enclosures cc: John Chambliss, Acting Director, Parks & Recreation ® Recycled Paper of RoaNa~~ t, p 2 J ? a ~ 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 July 29, 1992 P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZY MINNIX GVE SPRING MAGISTERALL. DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable John Warner, U. S. Senator The Honorable Charles Robb, U. S. Senator The Honorable Jim Olin, U. S. Representative The Honorable Rick Boucher, U. S. Representative Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 72892-7f opposing Federal legislation concerning the reporting of property taxes to the Federal government. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, July 28, 1992. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bj h Attachment cc: The Honorable Alfred C. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 y'YLcL ~ 7~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Anderson, Roanoke County Treasurer ® Recycled Paper ~F (~OANp~-~ a ~ p z ~ J ? a 1 38 C~~~xxt# ~~ ~~xx~~.~.~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 July 28, 1992 Ms. Cynthia Delumyea, Chairman Raffle Committee 5370 Silver Fox Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Delumyea: (703) 772-2005 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. for a raffle and one-time bingo game permit. This event will be held on October 31, 1992. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1992. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER I OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KONINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZY MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ® RecyGed paper t ry ~. ~1~ ~:. I ~1 i ir' .h n + :> > ~, :~p.~.. - ®~LVJL®1'~1 G'Y JL.e~JL~~ ®~ ~Y ~~~~A~1~~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHT~L RICHMOND, 232? 9 COMMISSIONER July 15 , 19 9 2 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated May 26, 1992, the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby approved, effective July 1, 1992. ADDITION LENGTH EDGEBROOK ROAD Route 1150 (Edgebrook Road) - From Route 705 to existing Route 1150 0.37 mile Southwest Route 311 0.60 Mi Sincerely, ~~Ra D Pethte y 1 Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY `! 7-z~ MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge FROM Edward G. Kohinke, DATE: .July 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Recognition for Moose Lodge Donation Please make sure that we generate a suitable form of recognition for the Moose Lodge. Also, if the media doesn't show up for the presentation on Saturday, we may want to follow up with something later on when the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad actually gets the boat. To the best of my knowledge, there aren't too many of these boats around, and this could be areal novelty as well as a valuable rescue asset. CC: Board of Supervisors Tommy Fuqua Anne Marie Green ROANOKE LODGE No. 284 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE Mailing Address: ('O. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 Phone: 384-7172 June 25, 1992 Mr. Edward Kohinke Roanoke County Supervisor 3738 Brambleton Ave. PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Kohinke The Masons Cove Rescue Squad recently requested our help in obtaining a Swift Water Rescue Boat for their use in the event of a flood or in the Lakes, Rivers and Streams of Roanoke County. In compliance of the Bingo Laws of Roanoke County, The Board of Officers and Membership of Roanoke Moose Lodge # 284, approved a donation of $ 16,380.00 for the purchase of this Boat and the associated equipment consisting of Trailer, Motor, Life preservers, Lights, Drag Hooks, Radios and Oars. This Boat along with the Suburban Passenger Vehicle we donated to the Masons Cove Fire Department in February of this year, will be on display and Officially donated to the Masons Cove Rescue Squad, at our Lodge on July 4, 1992 at 2:00 PM. We would be honored with your, presence at this Ceremony. We are having an open house for our Members with food, refreshments, swimming and fun. You and your family are welcome as our guests. The Roanoke Moose Lodge # 284 is constantly striving through our Community Service programs to be a good neighbor in our Community, that we are indeed a Family Fraternity. Please join with us for this important ceremony and an afternoon of fun and fellowship. 7f~(~1L ~-,~ ~ ~ Sincerely, 0' cs~ Bruce Hensley Community Service Chairman 362-4047 y V ~ ~ Lodge Locat From I-81, it 41 On SR 311, North r'i~ VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. 412 Shenandoah Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 343-0987 FAX (703) 343-7407 July 16, 1992 Ms. Mary H. Allen Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Allen, Please accept this letter as a request from Virginia Amateur Sports, sponsor of the Commonwealth Games of Virginia, to appear before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, July 28 at 7:00 pm. Representing our company will be Peter R. Lampman, Associate Director, and Kenneth C. King Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors for VAS. Mr. King would like to present an appreciation plaque to the County of Roanoke at this time for their gracious support of the 1992 Commonwealth Games of Virginia. We would also like to recognize Ms. Marcia Patton, an employee of the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department for the major role she played in the success of the Games. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns. Si cerely, ~~ (- Peter R. L'~mpman Associate Director CC: Kenneth C. King Jr. Marcia Patton SPONSOR OF 2 JULY 21 - JOINT MEETING WITH VINTON JULY 28 "ESTABLISH SSE/R PROGRAM IN PRIVATE SECTOR REQUEST FOR FUNDING FROM REGIONAL HOUSING NETWORK .ACCEPT SCHOOL GRANT FOR TRANSITION PROGRAM PUBLIC HEARINGS REZONE .9 ACRES M-2 TO R-1 LAYMAN ROAD 6-YR CONSTRUCTION PLAN SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR STUMP AND INERT DUMP (BANDY) ,,..ORD. TO RAISE ADMINISTRATIVE FEES ;'2ND READING - ORD CONVEYING EASEMENT TO APCO ~'"REPORTS - WATER PROJECT (INCLUDE RECIRCULATING) LANDFILL -WORK SESSIONS - ZONING ORDINAN E <r c~c.~ ~,+tiQ ~~ RECOGNIZE ~OOSE L~DGE BOAT DONATION ALAS TO MAKE PRESENTATION (7 PM) ~~ ,P_.~~ ~ - iy-~z ~ ~ .~ ~. ~~s ~-~~~ ` ~~N ,, ~ ~ , ; 1 ~~~- :. Jn, / l t~, MEMO - 7/10/92 ~ ~ ~ ;,a_ ,- -I ~~~ ,.,, ~,~ .. 1 To: Elmer Hodge ~ e ~, ~o t ~ 1~~.,~ .~~~`~ , From: Lee B. Eddy ~" ~ ~' Subject: Information on Replacement of Water Lines ~ '~ ~`~ ~ `~ ~~' ~ f ~'~ ~ , f, Confirming our discussion on 7/9/92, I am requesting the following ~ information: ~-- 1. The criteria used to determine which existing water distribution lines are in the greatest need of replacement. 2. A list of those water systems that have been identified for replacement, and an approximate time schedule. Thank you for your help. copy: Cliff Craig a 0~ ROANp~,~ a ~ 9 Z 's = 8 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 ~.oixxt#~ ~# ~.~r~tx~.~~.e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: Members, Board of Supervisors -~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge July 17, 1992 DONATION FROM MR. MILLARD TRUSSELL (703) 772-2005 Attached is a copy of a letter which contained a check for $1,000 that I recently received from Mr. Millard Trussell. After speaking with Mr. Trussell, I found that he sent a similar check to Roanoke City. I wanted to let you know that the check was received and ask that you be thinking about an appropriate way to thank Mr. Trussell. I will bring this to you at a board meeting for acceptance and appropriation. ECH/bjh Enclosure BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERAL OISTRKT BOB L. JOHNSON MOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZI"' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ® Recycled Paper +T~a °~ s r ~~ ~ ~ ~ Shenandoah Life insurance Company A MUTUAL COMPANY MILLARD M. TRUSSELL, CLU July 13 , 1992 Mr. Elmer Hodge, Manager County of Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Hodge; It has been my intention for quite some time to show my appreciation to the people of and the county in which I live for the many blessings that I have enjoyed over these past fifty years. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,000.00 to be put to use by you in any intelligent manner that you see fit. I am sure that you, in your position, will have much better knowledge of that decision than I would ever possess. Thank you for your fine work for me and the rest of the fine people of Roanoke County. Sincerely, ~~ ~ ~~ Millard M. Trussell 4246 STARKEY ROAD • SUITES A, B ~ C • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014. OFFICE (703)989.4531; RES. (703) T74-0386 NT~s e °~ m W ~~ _ 6 T M1~ ~~ Shenandoah Life Insurance Company A MUTUAL COMPANY MILLARD M. TRUSSELL, C! U July 13 , 1992 Mr. Elmer Hodge, Manager County of Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, Virginia Dear Prlr . Hodge ; It has been my intention for quite some time to show my appreciation to the people of and the county in which I live for the many blessings that I have enjoyed over these past fifty years. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,000.00 to be put to use by you in any intelligent manner that you see fit. I am sure that you, in your position, will have much better knowledge of that decision than I would ever possess. Thank you for your fine work for me and the rest of the fine people of Roanoke County. Sincerely, Millard M. Trussell July 28 - Evening Session at 7:00 p.m. Kenneth King, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Pete Lampman, Associate Director of Virginia Amateur Sports have asked for a few minutes at 7:00 p.m. to present recognition to the Board of Supervisors for their contribution to the VAS. They would also like to recognize Marsha Patton (loaned employee from P&R) at that time. Per telephone coversation with Pete Lampman (343-0987) on 7/13/92 pOANp,I, tk~ i L 2 ~ 1 3 .~~ P.O. BOX 29800 ~~ (a- ~'"' ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 --~ I ty~ ~~ ~~ L~ I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HO~GE June 2 9 , 19 9 2 (703) 772-2004 EDWARD c ~~ Robert H. Fetzer, President n. UDELL`FUZZY" MINNIx Roanoke Regional Housing Network CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P. 0. BOX 5 9 8 HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT Roanoke, Virginia 24004 (703)772-2005 Re: RRHN Request for Funds Dear Mr. Fetzer: In response to your letter dated June 26, 1992 I will ask the County Administrator to prepare an analysis and report for consideration by the Board of Supervisors at a regular meeting on July 14 or 28, 1992. I will also ask him to advise you of the meeting time and date so you or a representative may speak to the Board on this subject. I believe there is general support on the Board of Supervisors for more efforts aimed at "affordable housing". Personally, I would be very interested in hearing about the experiences of other communities that have had the Enterprise Foundation do similar studies for them. Thank you for your interest and leadership in working toward a very laudable goal. Sincerely, ~~ Lee B. Eddy copy: Board Reading File Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Terry Harrington * - with copy of Fetzer letter and attachments ® Recycled Paper oano e e Tonal Cousin etZvork, B affiCzated with the Council of Community Services June 26, 1992 Mr. Lee Eddy Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P 0 Box 28900 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Eddy: As you know, the Roanoke Regional Housing Network recently requested assistance from the Enterprise Foundation in the. development of a regional strategy to meet the housing needs of the Cities of Salem and Roanoke., Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton. I have attached for your information a copy of their response to our request. It is clear that they are eager to become involved, and are prepared to begin as early as this fall. The cost for services under the agreement would be $10,000 plus reasonable travel expenses. The Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority has agreed to contribute $2,000. We are requesting that the Cities of Salem and. Roanoke, and Roanoke County participate by each contributing the same amount of $2,000. Since the United Way. has also indicated an interest in-our endeavors we are requesting that they contribute the remainder. of the cost. The Roanoke Regional Housing Network is encouraged and excited by the participation of the valley governments, service organizations and private businesses in this endeavor. I would appreciate your consideration of this request and, should you so desire, I would be more than happy to meet with you to further discuss this matter. Sincerely, Robert H. Fetzer President Roanoke Regional Housing Network nb Enclosure ~ - cc: Terry Harrington, bebbie Kendall .Dan. Pollock, Joe Yates P. O .Bob 5~8; 7~oanoke, N~! 24004 • (703) 985-0131. • ~~lX (703).982-2935 ~~~/ CELEBRATINGI THEE TERP ~~~~ N RI E F DATI N O / S OtJN 0 1 k>!>t `rural t1~~1rs J.{MLS N'. NUUSE tll.{IBM.>" June 12, 1992 P.\uLC.RRUrur 1 It\R 1 UN 11 {N\ 1 1, 111 \ ICI. CIIAIR N CO-CLU LD\\'.{RDI_Q(IINN Mr. Robert H. Fetzer SCNIOR\'ICEPRESIUENI Interim President RIi I:CUIIEN Roanoke Regional Housing Network VICE PRESIDENT P . ~ . pox 117 4 "{l1ERG EARR Roanoke, Virginia 24006 \~li E 1`RESIUENT JU{N AI. RLL\ L~ \ll L 1'RESIUEN I P.\lR1iL\ l RO(I~L Dear Bob, SlCRL lARI' IRI {~URLR I Nl~~ 1 LL5 IL{RR1' \Y. Al URIG111, f R SI:S.{N G. U{ALR µ111N P. RIwRN P\UI C. URUPIIY 1 \l1NNLU UI~NKL I UIL I.C.{BILK 1N N1\\IUNIIG / IIAMUI N~ Ill \NI' l.. LUNLNU) I.IIRUUN (.I ISUI MA llll:\5 1. U~ \ 110 Cl•)IIINI. N. UUI ULAHI. \\ 11. AROf.IE GEORGE HI\ERLY 5111 S GRLLNOiGII RON{l U GNZ\'\\"INSI~I 1 tlAR lUNII:\N\'EI'. 111 {NUKE\1' IIEISAEIL I{MES.{.1011\SON p~GL\M{N CIIARLES McC Ald i 111\). IR. U.\\1U 0. AL{\\\'Ll 1. NOUCRT 5. M.,N {~I,{R{ )111 !ON I. 1'ETNI[ EU\\'{RU l.. ltl it\N IILNRI' S. RLlyj 1 \MES \1'. ROUSL P 11 RILIA I. RUU~L \111 I1.{~i .{, ~(-IINIYI R I 1 I'1II:N S I \ALU tl 11 N Slll LUI RI.LN 11 N{U1 VIII 11{EI 11. 1\{I 111 A.\REN IIdS UL \\ II I IAAI~ R.{UI 1'L.{GUIRRC U {RR1'ZIG{S IIl1NORARI' TROD 1 LL5 CUI LAI UNU 1O11N \1'. GARUNCR LRNESI \\'. II.{IIN 1 UUU E. ~I{RTIN LCEU.{ ~I.iRTINI: RICA {NDD P\H~UM i 11.\Rl L5~. RIIUU .11LS:1NOCRU INUNUNIUGI. As we had discussed, enclosed is our form assessment contract. This can certainly be amended to meet Roanoke Valley's needs. Please look it over, and I look forward to hearing from you by the end of next week. Sincerely, ~~ _ i C Heidi Most Deputy Director for Program Services L:Ci i Rick Cohen I~ ~ ~~1~~4i~ ~, ~ ~ V' .a r JUN 22 1992 RRHBA SUII :\I\I[RI(.:\N < I I1 Ullll I)INt., (t)l 1IM81:\, ~IAI(YI ANI) LIUi4 ilU / 964-1230 DRAFT June 12, 1992 Mr. Robert H. Fetzer Interim President Roanoke Regional Housing Network Post Office Box 1174 Roanoke, Virginia 24006 Dear Bob: This letter agreemett (the "Letter Agreement") WiU serve g.S a proposal and if, executed by you, will become a binding agreement. Under this agreement, the Enterprise Foundation ("the Foundation"). Will GAnduct an assessment (the "Assessment") of current affordable housing needs and opportunities in Roanoke Valley, Virginia and potential far increased affordable housing opportunities through apublic/private partnership in your community. The Assessment will help the Foundation evaluate your community's commitment and capacity to develop an effective public/private partnership for affordable housing. The scope of the Assessment will cover the following: Housing Needs - Review existing statistics and studies regarding housing problems, housing needs of the low and moderate-income population and special populations, existing programs and plans. - Interview housing officials and key public and private leaders regarding their perception of needs. Housing Production - Review annual production of housing, and other remedial efforts, including programs and activities of local government, nonprofit organizations, private developers, local housing authority, and banks. - Analyze basic categories of major housing efforts, typical costs and incomes of beneficiaries. Mr. Robert H. Fetzer June 15, 1992 Page -3- Our report will be based on review of material provided before and during the visit and on the interviews and meetings that take place during the visit. Appropriate Enterprise staff will visit the Roanoke Valley in 1992, approximately two weeks after all necessary appointments have been set up. It has been agreed that you will arrange interviews and meetings with appropriate individuals in Roanoke Valley, as set forth in the "Assessment Planning Form." In executing this agreement, you agree to pay the Foundation up to $10,000 plus all reasonable travel expenses. Tire $10,000 will defray the cost of preparing for the visit, conducting the assessment, producing thirty (30) copies of the written report, and providing follow-up telephone consultation. Any changes to the terms of this Letter Agreement shall be in writing. If this is your organization's understanding of our agreement please execute this Letter Agreement, in duplicate, and return one copy to: Ms. LaCharla Figgs, Contract Coordinator, The Enterprise Foundation, 500 American City Building, Columbia, Maryland 21044. Sincerely, This Letter Agreement is agreed to and acknowledged and we covenant to perform all obligations of the City of Roanoke, Virginia as set forth above: THE ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION, INC. Rick Cohen, Vice President Program Services By: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (OR 1EIOUSING COMMISSION) By: Signature Date Typed or Printed Name & Title ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION ASSESSMENT PLANNING FORM Please fill out this pre-visit questionnaire to facilitate the planning of an itinerary and to give Enterprise staff the information necessary to conduct informed interviews. A. Key Leaders 1. Foundations, Institutions and Corporations Institutions Key Leader/Title 2. Local government -- List those housing professionals, council members concerned about housing, city manager, mayor, etc. Name Title 3. Housing Authority Name Title 1-~-91 ASMTFORM C. Key Housing Program - List below major past present housing programs or initiatives which have led to the production of low-income housing (e.g. a Neighborhood Housing Service loan program; city-run rehab program; private developer new construction initiative, etc.); Type/Amount Program/Initiative Housing Produced Contact D. Primary Development Opportunities -- What type of housing or development make most sense to develop as low-income housing? Estimated Total Development Tvpe of Housing Occupied/Vacant Location Cost Per Unit E. LOCAL DATA: Please attach readily available data on the need for low-income housing. Helpful information would include: 1. A population breakdown by income. 2. A breakdown of rental units by rent levels 3. A summary of for sale units by value 4. The number of substandard rental and owner-occupied units 5. Vacancy rates in for sale and rental stock 6. Location of deteriorated or overcrowded units 7. Location of neighborhoods undergoing economic or racial change 8. Map of designated CDBG, Farmers Home or other targeted areas. 9. Studies of housing and community development needs for individual neighborhoods 10. Housing Assistance Plan and Comprehensive Homeless Assistance Plan F. Supportive Social Services - Please list institutions, agencies, programs that provide social services in the community that could potentially support persona living in low-income housing. Institution/Agency Program Contact MISSION STATEMENT ROANOKE REGIONAL HO~JSING NETWORR Housing is basic shelter... and much more. Zt is a symbol of a community's values. It is also a product of those values, and its availability and condition represent the efforts of many interests striving to achieve individual, organizational, and community objectives. Whether the focus of these objectives is planning, financing, preservation, development or advocacy, housing is the common element of each. The mission of the Roanoke Rectional Housing Network is to bring together diverse yet complementary interests to promote comprehensive discussions and effective action on housing issues throughout the Roanoke region. The Network shall be a forum and catalyst for the Roanoke region's housing interests to become proactively involved in the resolution of housing issues. To this end, the Network shall strive to: Advocate equal opportunities for all types of housing throughout the Roanoke region, for all income levels and population groups, Propose and promote comprehensive, innovative and bold strategies and plans to enhance housing's contributing role to the region, Facilitate, coordinate, encourage and solicit cooperation and communication among various community housing interests so that the efficient and optimal use of resources can be achieved, and Sponsor and promote community dialogue on and understanding of housing issues. Adopted: December 18, 1991 ROANOKE REGIONAL HOUSING NETWORK Organizations represented on the BOARD OF DIRECTORS Blue Ridge Environmental Network City Manager's Follow-up Task Force on Homelessness (Roanoke City) City of Roanoke City of Salem Council of Community Services County of Roanoke Downtown Roanoke, Inc. Fifth Planning District Commission League of Older Americans Mental Health Services Neighborhood organizations of Roanoke County Neighborhood organizations of Salem Roanoke Community Development Corporation, Inc. Roanoke Neighborhood Partnership Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce Roanoke Regional Home Builders Association, Inc. Roanoke Valley Apartment Association Roanoke Valley Association of Realtors Roanoke Valley Ministers Conference Roanoke Valley Mortgage Bankers Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation TAP Housing Foundation Total Action Against Poverty United Way of Roanoke Valley 5/5/92 1 i~/1 THE ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION J.~)tES \~ RI~CS[ CH.41R\IA. The Enterprise Foundation is a nonprofit, publicly supported, charitable foundation, Pal L ~_ BRUPH, launched in 1982 by Jim and Patty Rouse. Its mission is to see that all low-income \~ICE CII11R Americans have, within a generation, the opportunity for fit and affordable housing F. BARTO~ H>R~'El~. III ~~ICE CEi aIR and economic self-sufficiency. . ED~~~>RDl QCI\V SENOR \1CE PRESIDE\T RIChc0I1E. Enterprise works in more than 90 cities with over 150 nonprofit groups. It works VICE PRESIDENT through community partnerships forged with local nonprofit housing groups \~.4ETER ~,_ F.4RR "~E PRESIDE.T neighborhood people, businesses, social service agencies and local governments. P.aTRIC1:1 T ROl~SE Enterprise helps these nonprofit groups build their capacity to provide affordable SECRETaR, . TREaSE:RER housing by reducing the cost of construction and rehabilitation, by financing projects at low-interest rates, by finding local business support and by linking essential TRCSTEES human support services to low-income housing. To date, the Foundation's assistance "{RR' " ~LBRIGHT ,R has helped make possible more than 16,000 new and rehabbed units of housing for SCS.~~ G. BARER JOHN P BOORS lower-income families. P~CL C. BROPHS 1'~~OS>F R Bl RRE LISLEC C~RTER.JR. Ra,~"°`° ~. ~H.a?,BERS At the national level Enterprise tries to create understanding and sensitivity for the HE>RSG CIS~EROS GORDO~ COS B, , housing needs of the poor by working closely with both policy makers and \,„ H. a5 ~ De\ ITO philanthropic organizations. Enterprise provides advice to elected officials and CCSHIAG~ DOLBf dRE ,a?ILELi,iR, federal agencies on housing policy initiatives. The foundation and its board of \\ II F:RO\,E ~,EORGIi distinguished Americans have raised over $228 million through equity investments RU~dI D:: RZ1AAIA5f;1 ,. B:\Rro~ h+R\ Ee ll, and through grants and loans from corporations, foundations and individuals to ,.DRE\\E~,EI,~EEI support its work in communities. I UCI51 A14R71~ D~\,D,~ \,>~\,ELE CII~RLES\'`` \, ~\THI:\S.JR ROBERT S )Ic~A?IARA In 1990 Enterprise committed itself to an expanded outreach effort to aid many ~ \HETI)., PETRIE more cities, neighborhoods and poor Americans. Enterprise also established a ED\„RD'.. QL,.. HE~R1S RE~SS Community Services Group to help communities assess and link available support ,~>ILS\\ Rl>LSE services to low-income housing. P>TRI<IA 1 ROUSE STEPHF~ ST1?L~5 ELLE.SE,.ZBERGERST~RaL~S ?HCH {ELH \\aLSH The Foundation has two for-profit subsidiaries: The Enterprise Social Investment . KaRE. H.4511E \\,LEL4~I5 Corporation (ESIC), identifies and develops new sources of financing to help 4>DRL\~) ~o~sc R4CE 1'Z ~GLIRRE communitles rovide housin for lower-income families; and The Enterprise P g BURR, ZIG95 Development Company (EDC), a taxpaying commercial real estate developer. Earnings from both ESIC and EDC flow to the Foundation to support its charitable HO>OR4R1 iRl STEFS wQrk~ _ ( OY EAl l ~D ~pH~ v~ ~,~RD>f.R FR>FS7 ~\ Eiiti~ LFE-D4 \I~RTI~G August 1991 , RI<H.~RD r, r~RSC)cs Ui:ARLLSS R(,BB 11 I A.A~D! R B IRCIACBRIUGF 500 AMERIC.~V CIiY BUILDING. COTCMBId_ SiARYl9A'D 310ii }01 i 96i-1230 f -~~ Rick Cohen Rick Cohen is Vice President of The Enterprise Foundation, a charitable organization building a national system of housing for very low-income households. From 1985 to 1989, he was Director of the Department of Housing and Economic Development for the City of Jersey City, New Jersey, where he established major new initiatives in low-income housing and community-based development. Mr. Cohen has also worked for national nonprofits, including the Trust for Public Land and The Institute on Man and Science. Before joining The Enterprise Foundation, Mr. Cohen also served as a consultant to a number of governmental and nonprofit organizations through his consulting firm, Rick Cohen and Associates. An AICP accredited planner, he is well-known in the planning and development field for his design of "linkage" programs in which market-rate developers contribute to the cost of building low- income housing. Mr. Cohen's other professional expertise includes neighborhood planning, downtown and waterfront development, and inclusionary zoning. He has been an adjunct professor of public policy at St. Peter's College in Jersey City, New Jersey, and urban planning at Rutgers State University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Mr. Cohen is the author of several books, including Housing Trust Funds in I~ew Jersev (1989) and Small Towns and Small Towners (1979), as well as numerous articles in professional and international journals. Mr. Cohen holds a B.A. in political science from Boston University and a Masters in City Planning from the University of Pennsylvania. V MEMORANDIIM TO: Bob Johnson Ed Kohinke Elmer Hodge Bayes Wilson Paul Grice FROM: Diane Hyatt ~,ta,~ DATE: July 7, 1992 SIIBJECT: Audit Committee Meeting The next Audit Committee meeting is scheduled for 2:00 PM, July 28, 1992, in the County Administrator's conference room. At this time KPMG Peat Marwick will make a brief presentation of their audit procedures and their preliminary findings from the interim audit work. Please let me know if you have any conflicts with this meeting. ~. V MEMORANDUM TO: Lee Eddy Bob Johnson Ed Kohinke Fuzzy Minnix Harry Nickens FROM Mary Allen ..ml~ ~- DATE: July 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Landfill Board Appointment At the July 14 meeting, Ed Kohinke nominated Mikeiel Wimmer to another four-year term on the Landfill Board if she was willing to serve. I contacted Ms. Wimmer today, and she indicated that she is willing to serve another four-year term. Therefore, I will place her name for appointment on the July 28 Consent Agenda. Mary or Brenda: The Smith Gap Landfill and Spring Hollow Reservoir status reports will be on the July 28 agenda. I have called Cliff and John to remind them and asked that they get something to me by the first part of next week. Wanda 7/15/92 J t K MEMORANDUM TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: Mary Allen John Chambliss Edward G. Kohinke June 26, 1992 ,~-l'. Appointment to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission At the next board meeting I will nominate Wayne Gauldin for the Parks and Rec Advisory Commission. His address is 6032 Newport Road, Catawba Virginia 24070. His phone number is 384-6507. Please be sure that he is contacted the soonest by someone from staff to fill him in on his duties, the meeting schedule, etc. Wayne is very sports as well as civic minded. He is a past president of the Catawba Ruritan Club, and his son is active in many of our sports programs. He will be a real asset to the commission, and I'm understating it when I say that I wanted to jump for joy when he finally agreed to do it. I regret that my friend Spike Harrison had to resign, and 1 want him to receive a letter of appreciation for his efforts. CC: Wayne Gauldin Fenton Harrison Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a sanitary fill stump dump and inert material landfill on approximately 75 acres, located on the east side of Merriman Road (Route 613), 800 feet north of its intersection with Token Road (Route 684), Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 9, 1992 7)'~ c:za~~ ~l Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 14, 1992 Tuesday, July 21, 1992 Direct the bill for publication to: Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. c/o Ed Natt PO Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 r PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on July 28, 1992, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING ARTICLE I "IN GENERAL," OF CHAPTER 21 "TAXATION" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 21-8 "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR TAX COLLECTION BY LEGAL ACTION" All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~. aul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: July 14, 1992 July 21, 1992 Post-Its"" brand fax transmittal memo 671 f pages - To Fro Send invoice to: _ try Board of Supervisors Dept. Phon P. O. BOX 29800 Fax# Fax# Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN r~-T K-~ -- _, 1 s r P U B L I C N O T I C E Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County at its meeting on the 28th day of July, 1992, at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: Adopt the Virginia Department of Transportation funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for fiscal year 1992-93. All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the proposed schedule referred to above is on file at the Residency Office, State Highway Department, 714 South Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, and the Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia where it is available for public inspection during regular business hours. y~~-..~d Q..eeP.~/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PUBLISHED IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES Tuesday, July 14, 1992 Tuesday, July 21, 1992 BILL TO: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 f LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Martha C. Chinault to rezone .9 acre from M-2 to R-1 to allow continuation and expansion of an existing residential use, located at 4616 Layman Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 9, 1992 ~~~h ~/~~~J ~w Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 14, 1992 Tuesday, July 21, 1992 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018