Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/22/1992 - Regularo~ aoaNO~~ ~ ~ r.. ' p Z ~, ~ a2 1838 /2ARl 6712 H.//E Fm's C~~~x~#~ ~~ ~..~~x~~~P ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. HCN ABSENT AT 3:03 P.M. (HCN ARRIVED 3:15 P.M.~ 2. Irnocation: Rev. Arthur E. Grant Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS LBE ANNOUNCED ITEM E-5 WITHDRAWN AT EGK'S REQUEST ADDED TWO REAL ESTATE ITEMS UNDER EXECUTIVE SESSION C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i ® Regded Paper 1. Introduction of the 1992-93 Officers of the Employees Advisory Committee. (Diana Wilson, Past Chairman) DIANA WILSON INTRODUCED NANCY BAILEY CHAIRMAN EAC AND TODD BOOTH VICE C EAC D. BRIEFINGS 1. September Report on 1991 Water Projects PRESENTED BY CLIFF CRAIG AND TED PETOSKI HAVES SEAY MATTERN & MATTERN 2. Smith Gap Landfill PRESENTED BY OHN HUBBARD, CEO, ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 3. Results of Space Needs Study PRESENTED BY ECH AND TYKE TONES, TONES & TONES ARCHITECTS 4. Team Training Program PRESENTED BY ECH AND DON MYERS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of Change Order for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Contract. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) A-92292-1 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER URC 2. Request from the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau for Resolution of Support for Grant Application 2 to the Center on Rural Development. (Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist) R-92292-2 BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE RESO URC 3. Request from the Department of Social Services for a Medicaid Benefit Program Worker to be Fully Reimbursed by the State of Virginia. (Dr. Betty McCrary, Social Services Director) A-92292-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE POSITION URC 4. Request for Approval of Recommendation to Implement Removal, Remedial and Closure of Dixie Caverns Landfill. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 8, 1992) (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) A-92292-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL STAFF POSITION AND EQUIPMENT AYES-Bh~T,EGK F~M,HCN ABSTAIN-LBE 5. Request to Reconsider Revising the Policy for Use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) WITHDRAWN AT REQUEST OF SUPERVISOR KOHINKE 6. Request for Declaration of Intention for Reimbursement of Expenses from Bond Issue Proceeds for Acquisition of Land for High School. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) R-92292-5 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE RESO 3 URC 7. Request to Extend Valley Metro Service into Roanoke County. (John Cham6liss, Assistant County Administrator) A-92292-6 FM MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMII~NDATION TO DEFER ANY DECISION TO THE 1993-94 BUDGET PROCESS URC F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA FM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING ZND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING 10/27/92 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 3.09 Acres from R-5 to R-1 to Construct Single Family Homes, Located at the Intersection of Buck Mountain and Starkey Roads, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Palm Hermitage Corporation. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1, Ordinance amending and readopting Article I, "In General" of Chapter 21 "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code by the Addition of a New Section 21-9 "Use of Credit Card in Payment of Taxes". BIT MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/13/92 4 J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to Amend and Reenact Section 7-61, Roanoke County Code and Adopt Section 105, Unsafe Buildings, Volume II, Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections) 0-92292-7 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 2. Ordinances Amending and Reenacting Various Sections of the Roanoke County Code to Reflect Recent Legislative Changes By the General Assembly. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCES URC a. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 3-5. SMOKING PROHIBITED. SEC. 3-8. EXEMPTIONS., SEC 3-10. POSTING REQUIREMENTS AND SEC. 3-12. ENFORCEMENT. OF ARTICLE II, ROANOKE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY OF CHAPTER 3, AIR POLLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE REGARDING EXCEPTIONS TO AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA INDOOR CLEAN AIR ACT. 0-92292-8.a b. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 4-86. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 4-90. PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT OPERATION OR CONDUCT GENERALLY., SEC. 4-95. LIMITATION ON VALUE OF PRIZES., SEC. 4-96. FINANCIAL RECORDS AND REPORTS GENERALLY. SEC. 4-97. CERTIFICATE TO ACCOMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT., SEC 4-100. LIMITATION ON FREQUENCY OF BINGO GAMES , SEC 4-101. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF GROSS RECEIPTS FROM BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES., SEC 4-113. QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANT , AND SEC. 4-117. 5 VALID ONLY IN COUNTY AND AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS; EXCEPTION OF ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE 0-92292-8.b c. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 7-68, REPAIR OR DEMOLITION BY COUNTY OF ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING LIENS AGAINST REAL ESTATE FOR COST OF REPAIR OR DEMOLITION 0-92292-8.c d. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 9-18. ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE FIRE MARSHAL TO ENTER PROPERTY TO INVESTIGATE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 0-92292-8.d e. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 10-4, APPLICATION FOR LICENSE• DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER• PENALTIES FOR OPERATING BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE FAILING TO FILE AN APPLICATION OR FILING FALSE STATEMENTS., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL TO RESTRICT ISSUANCE OF BUSINESS LICENSES WHERE ANY TAXES DUE THE COUNTY ARE UNPAID AND SEC. 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNT CODE TO ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS AND TO ADD 0-92292-8.e f. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 12-26, REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS, OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR 6 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING THE SITUS OF MOTOR VEHICLES 0-92292-8.f g. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC 12-54. PARKING PROHIBITED IN SPECIFIED PLACES. OF ARTICLE III, PARKING, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES BY ABOVE GRADE SIGNS. 0-92292-8.g h. ORDINANCE ENACTING SEC. 12-102, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES INVOLVED IN ACCIDENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO REMOVE VEHICLES WHICH ARE IMPEDING THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC AND FOR THEIR STORAGE 0-92292-8.h i. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 16.1- 25. INSPECTION OF RECORDS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER AND OR ARTICLES LISTED IN SUCH RECORDS., OF ARTICLE II. DEALERS, OF CHAPTER 16.1, PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ITEMS KNOW TO BE STOLEN. 0-92292-8.i j. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 17-2. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 17-14. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS., AND SEC. 17-15. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS GENERALLY., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, SEC. 17-75. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. OF DIVISION 3. COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION, AND SEC. 17-86. DEFINITIONS., OF DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES, OF ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF CHAPTER 17 PROCUREMENT CODE OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT BY WHICH FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS MAY BE INCREASED BY THE PURCHASING AGENT, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS ARE REQUIRED, TO AMEND THE CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION WITH QUALIFIED OFFERORS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND RAISE THE CEILING FOR SMALL PURCHASES AND PURCHASES RELATED TO MICROCOMPUTERS. 0-92292-S.i K. APPOINTMENTS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY, R-92292-9 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 7 URC 1. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.09 Miles of Ashbury Court, 0.20 Miles of Ashbury Drive, and 0.07 Miles of Greenmont Court into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. A-92292-9 .a 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly. A-92292-9.b 3. Request for Acceptance of Buckhorn Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-92292-9.c 4. Request for Acceptance of Christopher Drive into the 8 Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-92292-9.d 5. Request for Acceptance of Forest Creek Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-92292-9.e 6. Request for Public-Private Partnership Funds for an Industrial Building in Southwest Industrial Park. A-92292-9.f 7. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. A-92292-9.g PMM TO GET REPORT FROM TOWN OF VINTON ATTORNEY ON ADDITIONAL FEES. S. Acceptance of Donations of Right-of--way and Drainage Easement for Flintlock Road in Connection with the Hunting Hills Road Project. A-92292-9.h 9. Adoption of Resolution Endorsing the Passage of the State referenda Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. R-92292-9.i LBE ASKED THAT COPY GO TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY HCN ASKED THAT COPY GO TO VWCC 10. Approval of Raffle Permit from Cave Spring Elementary School PTA. A-92292-9.i M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR KOHINKE• (1) ATTENDED COUNTY COUNCIL OF PTA'S AND GLEN COVE PTA. RECEIVED FAVORABLE FEEDBACK ON BOND ISSUE. 9 SUPERVISOR 1VICKENS• (1) ANNOUNCED THERE IS NOW AN EXPLORE NEWSLETTER - "EXPLORATIONS". 2 ANNOUNCED THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DID NOT TURN UP G UNEXPECTED ON THE CURRENT LANDFILL. 3 THE EXPLORE BOARD APPROVED A $24,000 MATCH FROM VPI TO THE VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL ENDOWMENT FUND TO LOOK AT THE CLOSEOUT OF THE CURRENT LANDFILL,, 4 MET WITH PEOPLE ON RUTROUGH ROAD TO GET THEIR FEELINGS ON THE USE OF THE ROAD AS TEMPORARY ACCESS TO EXPLORE. SUPERVISOR OHNSON: (1) RESIDENTS IN I~IBELLVUE SUBDIVISION ARE HAVING PROBLEMS REFINANCING THEIR HOMES BECAUSE OF COUNTY LIEN FOR WATER LINE EXTENSION. PMM WILLING TO LIST THE LIEN AS A 2ND LIEN. 2 RESPONDED TO EGK'S MEMO REGARDING COMPANIES WHO HAVE LEFT THE ROANOKE VALLEY. SUPERVISOR EDDY: COMMENDED CHIEF CEASE FOR HIS ANNUAL REPORT. ASKED ECH TO GIVE UPDATE ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. 2 RECEIVED LETTER FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ON A PUBLIC HEARING THAT WILL BE HELD IN THE RCAC CO ROOM. 3 ATTENDED CENTER IN THE SQUARE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNiJAL MEETING. (4) ANNOUNCED THAT ROANOKE COUNTY HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE APPAIACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION. (5) ASKED ABOUT LEAF COLLECTION. ECH ADVISED GENERAL SERVICES WILL HANDLE WITH INMATE LABOR. (61 ADVISED THAT HE, ECH, FM AND TWG ATTENDED THE PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCING SALE OF DOMINION BANK BY FIRST UNION. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND C011,IlVIUNICATIONS O. REPORTS BI{T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance io 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -August, 1992 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of August 31, 1992 6. Report on Status of Sewage Treatment Plant Upgrade 7. Water Treatment Plant Design Review 8. Report on Norfolk and Western Petition for Correction of Erroneous tax Assessments. P. WORK SESSION 1. Review of Tax Exemption Programs for Air/Water Pollution Control and Recycling Equipment. STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO STUDY AND REPORT BACK HCN ASKED FOR RATIONALE ON COUNTY'S LOW ASSESSMENT OF MACHINERY AND TOOLS LBE ASKED FOR COMPARISON WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS OUTSIDE ROANOKE VALLEY. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to discuss consideration of the acquisition of real property for public purposes (two separate issues); (7) to consult with legal counsel concerning briefings by staff members pertaining to actual litigation. EGK MOTION AT 6:00 P.M. URC R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-92292-10 ii BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE EXCLUDING PENDING LITIGATION ISSUE URC WITH EGK ABSENT (LEFT AT 6.30 P M 1 EVENING SESSION S, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Chapter 13, Offenses-Miscellaneous by adding Article II, Noise, and by Deleting Section 13-3, Noise, of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) BIT MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND -OCTOBER 27 1992 - URC WITH EGK ABSENT T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Issuance of $1,830,000 General Obligation School Bonds from the Virginia Public School Authority. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) R-92292-11 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE RESO WITH CRESTAR BANK DESIGNATED AS BOND REGISTRAR URC WITH EGK ABSENT U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Eliminate Existing Conditions and Add One New Conditions on an Approximately 12 Acre Parcel Zoned B-2 Conditional, Located on the North Side of Peters Creek Road Approximately 50 Feet West of its Intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Dominion Bank, National Association. (Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & is Zoning) 0-92292-12 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC WITH EGK ABSENT V. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUI~TICATIONS NONE ~'~'• ADJOtifRNMENT BLJ MOTION AT 7.15 P M UVV WITH EGK ABSENT 13 ~ ROAN ,~. F ~. z ~' o a 1838 C~~ixxtt~ ~~ ~~~xx~a~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 Iff.~RI 6 7fE WE Rm~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Rev. Arthur E. Grant Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Introduction of the 1992-93 Officers of the Employees Advisory Committee. (Diana Wilson, Past Chairman) D. BRIEFINGS ® Recycled Paper 1. Quarterly Briefing on 1991 Water Projects. 2. Quarterly Briefing on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities. 3. Results of Space Needs Study. 4. Team Training Program. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of Change Order for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Contract. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 2. Request from the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau for Resolution of Support for Grant Application to the Center on Rural Development. (Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist) 3. Request from the Department of Social Services for a Medicaid Benefit Program Worker to be Fully Reimbursed by the State of Virginia. (Dr. Betty McCrary, Social Services Director) 4. Request for Approval of Recommendation to Implement Removal, Remedial and Closure of Dixie Caverns Landfill. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 8, 1992) (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 5. Request to Reconsider Revising the Policy for Use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) 6. Request for Declaration of Intention for Reimbursement of Expenses from Bond Issue Proceeds. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 7. Request to Extend Valley Metro Service into Roanoke a F. G. H. I. J. County. (John Chambliss, Administrator} REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Assistant County REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 3.09 Acres from R-5 to R-1 to Construct Single Family Homes, Located at the Intersection of Buck Mountain and Starkey Roads, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Palm Hermitage Corporation. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and readopting Article I, "In General" of Chapter 21 "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code by the Addition of a New Section 21-9 "Use of Credit Card in Payment of Taxes". SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to Amend and Reenact Section 7-61, Roanoke County Code and Adopt Section 105, Unsafe Buildings, Volume II, Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections) 2. Ordinances Amending and Reenacting Various Sections of the Roanoke County Code to Reflect Recent Legislative Changes By the General Assembly. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) a. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 3-5. SMOKING PROffiBITED., SEC. 3-8. EXEMPTIONS., SEC 3 3-10. POSTING REQUIREMENTS. AND SEC. 3-12. ENFORCEMENT. OF ARTICLE II, ROANOKE COUNTY SMOHING POLICY OF CHAPTER 3, AIR POLLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE REGARDING EXCEPTIONS TO AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA INDOOR CLEAN AIR ACT. b. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 4-86. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 4-90. PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT, OPERATION OR CONDUCT GENERALLY., SEC. 4-95. LIMITATION ON VALUE OF PRIZES., SEC. 4-96. FINANCIAL RECORDS AND REPORTS GENERALLY., SEC. 4-97. CERTIFICATE TO ACCOMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT., SEC 4-100. LIMITATION ON FREQUENCY OF BINGO GAMES., SEC 4-101. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF GROSS RECEIPTS FROM BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES., SEC 4-113. QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANT., AND SEC. 4-117. VALID ONLY IN COUNTY AND AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS; EXCEPTION. OF ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE c. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 7-68, REPAIR OR DEMOLITION BY COUNTY OF ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING LIENS AGAINST REAL ESTATE FOR COST OF REPAIR OR DEMOLITION d. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 9-18. ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE FIRE MARSHAL TO ENTER PROPERTY TO INVESTIGATE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS e. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 10-4, APPLICATION FOR LICENSE; DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER; PENALTIES FOR OPERATING BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE, FAILING TO FILE AN APPLICATION, OR FILING FALSE STATEMENTS., OF ARTICLE L IN GENERAL TO RESTRICT ISSUANCE OF 4 BUSINESS LICENSES WHERE ANY TAXES DUE THE COUNTY ARE UNPAID AND SEC. 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNT CODE TO ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS AND TO ADD f. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 12-26, REOUIRED; EXCEPTIONS, OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING THE SITUS OF MOTOR VEHICLES g. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC 12-54. PARKING PROHIBITED IN SPECIFIED PLACES. OF ARTICLE III, PARKING, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES BY ABOVE GRADE SIGNS. b. ORDINANCE ENACTING SEC. 12-102, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES INVOLVED IN ACCIDENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO REMOVE VEHICLES WHICH ARE IMPEDING THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC AND FOR THEIR STORAGE i. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 16.1- 25. INSPECTION OF RECORDS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER AND OR ARTICLES LISTED IN SUCH RECORDS., OF ARTICLE II. DEALERS, OF CHAPTER 16.1, PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ITEMS KNOW TO BE STOLEN. j. ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 17-2. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 17-14. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS., AND SEC. 17-15. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS GENERALLY., OF ARTICLE L IN GENERAL, SEC. 17-75. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES., OF DIVISION 3. COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION, AND SEC. 5 17-86. DEFINITIONS., OF DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES, OF ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF CHAPTER 17 PROCUREMENT CODE OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT BY WHICH FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS MAY BE INCREASED BY THE PURCHASING AGENT, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS ARE REQUIRED, TO AMEND THE CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION WITH QUALIFIED OFFERORS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND RAISE THE CEILING FOR SMALL PURCHASES AND PURCHASES RELATED TO MICROCOMPUTERS. K. APPOINTMENTS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII~L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.09 Miles of Ashbury Court, 0.20 Miles of Ashbury Drive, and 0.07 Miles of Greenmont Court into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly. 3. Request for Acceptance of Buckhorn Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for Acceptance of Christopher Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Request for Acceptance of Forest Creek Drive into the 6 Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Request for Public-Private Partnership Funds for an Industrial Building in Southwest Industrial Park. 7. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. 8. Acceptance of Donations of Right-of--way and Drainage Easement for Flintlock Road in Connection with the Hunting Hills Road Project. 9. Adoption of Resolution Endorsing the Passage of the State Referenda Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. 10. Approval of Raffle Permit from Cave Spring Elementary School PTA. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' C011~Il1~NTS AND COb~IlVIUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -August, 1992 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of August 31, 1992 6. Report on Status of Sewage Treatment Plant Upgrade 7. Water Treatment Plant Design Review 8. Report on Norfolk and Western Petition for Correction of Erroneous Tax Assessments. P. WORK SESSION 1. Review of Tax Exemption Programs for Air/Water Pollution Control and Recycling Equipment. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to discuss consideration of the acquisition of real property for public purposes; (7) to consult with legal counsel concerning briefings by staff members pertaining to actual litigation. R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION S. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Chapter 13, Offenses-Miscellaneous, by adding Article II, Noise, and by Deleting Section 13-3, Noise, of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Issuance of $1,830,000 General Obligation School Bonds from the Virginia Public School Authority. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Eliminate Existing Conditions and Add One New Condition on an Approximately 12 Acre Parcel Zoned B-2 Conditional, Located on the North Side of Peters Creek Road Approximately 50 Feet West of its s Intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Dominion Bank, National Association. (Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning) V. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COIbIlVIUNICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of 1992-93 Officers of the Employee Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Diana Wilson, past chairman of the Employee Advisory Committee, has requested time on the agenda to introduce the new officers for 1992-93. The Employee Advisory Committee provides a medium through which all employees may contribute advice, complaints, and suggestions regarding employment or employee relations matters in the County. Members also serve on the various County-wide committees and on Department teams. G~~ v ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens n h. i ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: September Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. Each quarter, a briefing will also be scheduled to discuss the progress. At the September 22 meeting, staff and representatives from Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern will be present to update the Board and answer questions. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir is now in its tenth month and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last month included: ° Grouting continued in Zones 2 and 3 ° Grouting of dam foundation started ° Grout access road was completed ° Excavation of dam foundation ° Construction of cut-off trench ° Completed excavation for river intake structure ° Excavation of pump house foundation ° Construction of pre-cast concrete panels for dam face started ° Development of the quarry area continues The Board approved change order number 7 in an amount of $755,563.43. Change order number 8 in an amount of $714,544.00 will be presented for approval by the Board at their September 22, 1992 meeting. The net effect of the eight change orders is to add $1,564,679.73 to the contract price. The current projected ~-/ Contract Total Cost including existing and pending change orders remains unchanged from last month and is $24,245,000.00. During the next month, the contractor will perform the following: ° Complete dam foundation excavation ° Continue dental grouting on west abutment ° Continue to develop the quarry site ° Continue work of pump house and river intake ° Continue casting pre-cast concrete panels ° Schedule factory tests of intake pump and motors Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $4,621,918.76 and $639,326.71 for engineering construction phase services. WATER TREATMENT PLANT The Water Treatment Plant is in the design phase. Work continues on the design of the treatment facility buildings, treatment processes, residue handling facilities, storage facilities and high service pump station. Work is 90% complete on the sanitary survey of the upper Roanoke River Basin and design work on the process control and display system is continuing. The pilot water treatment plant at the Glenvar site is operated 24 hours per day, five days per week with data provided to the State Health Department for review. The pilot continues to produce a high quality finished water. Staff has completed analysis of the effect of a tiered withdrawal permit. This analysis is presented in the attached separate report. During the next month staff will continue to operate the pilot water treatment plant at the Glenvar site. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work continues on the Water Transmission Line: ° Final route selection ° Title certification ° Easement negotiation ° Obtaining easements ° Preparation of construction drawings "4 SUBMITTED BY: _ ! APPROVED: Cliffor C ig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION _ys~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens -~-/ TIERED OPERATING PERMIT FOR SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR Early this Spring Mr. Eddy met with staff to discuss methods by which the County could get a temporary modification of the proposed Spring Hollow Reservoir permit that may allow the County to delay construction of the two million dollar Glenvar pump-back system and associated operating cost for a period of 15 to 20 years. Since the Army Corps of Engineers issued the permit and will be responsible for approving any modifications to the permit, a meeting with the Corps of Engineers was scheduled. On June 24, 1992 Lee Eddy, Don Myers and Cliff Craig met with Bob Hume and Thom Leedom of the Corps of Engineers to review the permit for withdrawing water from the Roanoke River. The permit modification proposed is that the County would agree to increase the minimum river flowby from 0.4 Mean Annual Flow (MAF) to 0.5 MAF during April and May and from 0.3 MAF to 0.4 MAF for the rest of the year. In exchange, the County would agree to increase the minimum flowby. The modified permit would not require river augmentation or pump-back as long as the County met the modified MAF requirements. Mr. Hume said that the Corps would consider such a permit modification. The Utility Department staff has run a computer model based on these proposed new conditions to determine their affect on flow in the river reduction in operating cost and their affect on the safe yield of the reservoir under the lower river withdrawal. The safe yield of the reservoir will be determined as the maximum amount of water that can be used during the worst drought since 1930. This safe yield will be used by the State Health Department for the operating permit of the water treatment plant. The worst drought since 1930 occurred from June 1980 to January 1982. The proposed permit modification to 0.5 and 0.4 MAF would provide a maximum safe yield of 7.5 MGD with the ability to provide 7.5 MGD the following year with average river flow. The County water usage projections indicate that the average water use in the year 2005 would be 10 MGD. With water purchased from the City and some use of wells, a 7.5 MGD safe yield could handle County needs until year 2005. If purchased water and wells could not be used, the 7.5 MGD safe yield would handle County needs until year 2000. Although the operating permit is established by safe yield during the drought period, operating costs were determined for a modified permit using average river flow. Attachment to the September Report on 1991 Water Projects A modified permit would result in the following savings in operating costs during average flow. MGD ANNUAL COST ~ _ / USAGE SAVINGS 3 $ 2,743 4 $ 5,211 5 $ 7,934 6 $10,756 7 $13,707 8 $16,941 The advantage to the County of a modified permit is the delay in constructing a major part of the $2,000,000 Glenvar pump station as well as the above operating costs and associated maintenance. The disadvantage to the County of a modified permit is the reduction of the safe yield from 19.2 MGD to 7.5 MGD. The modified permit would also require installation of pumping facilities between the reservoir and treatment plant 8 to 10 years earlier than would be required under the current permit. If the County deferred construction of the Glenvar pump station until year 2005 (or later), the County may be subject to new regulations regarding how safe yield is determined as well as possible new regulations regarding minimum in-stream flow requirements. Prior to staff proposing a permit modification to the Corps of Engineers, we need guidance form the Board of Supervisors as to the Board's willingness to accept an operating permit of 7.5 MGD and the possible associated risk of ever obtaining the ultimate 19.2 MGD permit. Staff prefers to continue under the original plan because of the possible reduction in the safe yield. Due to the potential savings associated with a modified permit, the Board may want to consider constructing the Glenvar pump station and obtain the ultimate safe yield of 19.2 MGD. At the same time, staff could discuss permit modifications with the Corps of Engineers that would not require operation of the Glenvar pump station unless our operations would decrease the river flow below the 0.5 or 0.4 MAF. There is a possibility that the Corps of Engineers would allow the County to operate the reservoir without river augmentation (pump- back) as long as no withdrawal from the river is made when the flow is 0.4 MAF or less. This may be accomplished by interpretation of the permit and not require a permit modification. The attached summary of the computer model shows the costs and river flows associated with a modified permit operation for both the June 1980 to January 1982 drought period and the January 1984 to January 1985 average year. Staff will proceed with this matter as directed by the Board of Supervisors. Attachment to the September Report on 1991 Water Projects m a .6 p r v 0 g • oooocno,a 3~~dd6ddd.= ~ ~~~ .~ ~ oooou~r~r~ ~ 3~ LL C d 0 0 0 ~ N • 4'v U 0 _t° a•p g mnmm.-mo • ~ o d .- N c4 sr v ~ci ~ ~ ~ 0 ti ~U ~ r~moma.~ao ~ ° N .- N a Ki r6 r: o ~ 2 ~ c~c~c~~°c~c~c~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m 2 ~ 3 ~ ~ LL ~ chi, ~i, ~°i, ~ ~i ~i, Z ~ ~ou~~~~u°NN3 m 3 ~i ~ ~o~~a°aSc~ ~: ~~i~~i~Si~i ~ U ~ ~ ~OOU~Oni~tdu°; ~N~ 83~#~~F~f~~ LL ~ o ~ T. ~ e~ ~ e~f th a ~ ~8~8888 c~ Y m ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 5 U a ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ o ~ o~~sg~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ 0 c~ammnaoa~ LL ~ ~ o • ~~ ~a' N N N p1 f7 ~ ~ d G O O G G 0 ~~v~~mm C d d C O C C m O Q t0 N m od~~.-NN Nv~~~mao ddrNNrf v n n n n n n n v v v v v a a nn~nnn{~: u~u>mn't~,u~n N N~~ N N N ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~e~ a ~ ~ n°, ~~~~~~~ g~3~~~~~ ~~~~~~g ~~~~s~~ n n ~a~~ ~~~~~~~ ffi~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~s~ ~~~~ c~vmm~mm `-/ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached are copies of the project status reports presented to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority at its September 17, 1992 meeting. Please note the adjustments made to the schedules due to delays. The tipper and maintenance facility was bid with costs exceeding the engineer's estimate. The project will be rebid after modifications in the plans, however, may still exceed estimates. The completion period will be shortened to meet deadlines. The transfer station has been advertised for bids, with bids due on September 30. Award of contract is anticipated to follow. The Resource Authority has completed the purchase of the transfer site and demolition has begun. Construction is expected to begin in November. The Part B permit has been submitted to the Department of Waste Management with comments expected by October 1. The site work at the landfill continues with major work being done on road building and grading in the fill area. Part B approval is still pending final resolution of the conflict between state and federal liner requirements. Meetings and a site visit with the Department of Waste Management have been held to inform them of the progress to date. Progress continues to be made, however, delays have resulted in modified schedules and completion dates. Respectfully submitte ~~ ohn R. ubbard Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority .~L.a ;'~ Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ----------------------- No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens .~ -2 PROJECT STATUS SMITH GAP LANDFILL 1992 1993 % SCHEDULE J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T 0 E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R ITE CLEARING ......... ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ '' ........ ........ ........ ........ ;::: `°'°' 00 ACCESS ROAD ~I ~I ~ I TIPPER SITE >:: "'<' 100 DRAINAGE I~<~ 16 ;.;::.;:. :... LJ SED. POND #1 ~I^ 73 SED. POND #4 n 67 LEACH. TANK RD 15 WATER TANK RD MISCELLANEOUS 32 DISPOSAL AREAS 1 Indicates change in schedule DESIGN FINANCIAL STATUS CONSTRUCTION 5779,850 Contract Amount 53,068.541 -0- -0- Change Orders 5779,850 TOTAL 53,068,541 S503,175 Payments to Date S 788,681 64% Percent of Total 27% Olver, Inc. Contractor Thomas Bros., Inc. 9/92 ~ -Z PROJECT STATUS ROANOKE TRANSFER STATION 1992 1993 % SCHEDULE J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R UBMIT PART A ........ ......... ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ P A R T A A P P R O V E D 00 SUB. VARIANCE W I T H D R A W N 100 DESIGN ! ^I ^ 99 PART B APPL. ^I ~ 100 CITY APPROVAL 95 ENVIR. ASSESS I 100 ENVIR. ASSESS II 100 ACQUISITION ~I ~I ~I 100 DEMOLITION ~~ I l k 15 CONSTRUCTION ;:;:;:; ;::: ;::: 0 CONST.REVISED o ioi o io io i^i i o i ii i ange s in chedule FINANCIAL STATUS DESIGN CONSTRUCTION $460,000 Contract Amount -0- Change Orders 5460,000 TOTAL 5169,570 Payments to Date 36% Percent of Total Olver, Inc. Contractor ..J -.2 PROJECT STATUS NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAIL SPUR SCHEDULE 1992 1993 % J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C O E A E A P A U U U E C O E O N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R DESIGN >;;;; 100 ACQUISITION 95 CLEARING\GRADE "' -:;: 25 TRACK CONST. ......... ........ ........ ......... ......... ........ ........ ......... ......... ........ 0 SPUR TO TRANS. 0 DUMPER 70 CARS 0 COVERS 0 FINANCIAL STATUS ESTIMATED COST: 59,000,000 (Design, construction, capital equipment) RVRA to pay actual costs not to exceed S9,000,000. Payments to be made in accordance with contract. Percent Complete: 30 9/92 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER _,~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Results of Space Needs Study COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for discussion of the current and future space needs for Roanoke County government. Jyke Jones, Jones & Jones Associates, will be present to review the results of his space study. Copies of previous reports on space needs will also be available. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR H~I DIAT THE ~ RE UNTY AD~INISTRATIONRCENTEI2 COUNTY , R.G ~R'rTNG DATE: September 22, 1992 AS3ENDA IT : Team Training Program Mrnz'rY ~t MTNTSmRATQR'S CO1~QiENTS: Qiilrii~ARY OF INFORMATION: The Training Advisory Team has designed a series of training sessions with a focus toward department heads and other Gang of Forty members. The purpose of the training is to assist those attending in gaining insight into the implementation of team management concepts throughout their organizations. Members of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator have been invited to attend and participate in this training. I am excited about this opportunity for us to meet and learn more about the concepts necessary for successful implementation and to exchange ideas about the process. Attached are the dates and an agenda for the sessions . As you will note, there will be team assignments which will provide an opportunity to discuss the status of the process, the advantages and dis ~ imtlement tion tfromatheoperspective of the Department continue p Heads, the Board, and the County Administrator, ~~ ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~-y "ENHANCING TEAMWORK IN RQ~NOKE COUNTY" AGENI~ September 24, 1992 I. Welcome -Elmer Hodge II. Introduction to "Enhancing Teamwork in Roanoke County" III. Team Dynamics in Roanoke County IV. Summary September 25, 1992 I. Recap Day I II. Making Communication Work for You III. Conflict: The Natural Growth Process October 5, 1992 I. Working Through Change II. Creating A Teamwork Environment October 6, 1992 I. The Goal of Continuous Improvement II. Where To Go From Here ~' ACTION # 92292-1 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Change Order No. 8 for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Contract COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~'~~ BACKGROUND• The Board of Supervisors approved a procedure for approval of Change- Orders on the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. This procedure requires Board of Supervisor approval for Change Orders that will cost in excess of $200,000. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• Change Order No. 8 in an amount of $714,544 is for material and construction required to add water lines associated with the water treatment plant and located within the Reservoir Project. These water lines are identified as lines B, C, and D on the construction drawings. The work involves: (1) Approximately 1, 094 linear feet of 36 inch raw water line from the gate house to crossing beneath and north of the Roanoke River, (2) Approximately 1,020 linear feet of 30 inch water line from the railroad tracks to crossing beneath and north of the Roanoke River, (3) Approximately 920 linear feet of 36 inch water line from the railroad tracks to discharge at the river near the river pipe crossing. Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc. has negotiated the price with the contractor and finds the $714, 544 cost to be fair and equitable and recommends acceptance. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds required for Change Order No. 8 in the amount of $714,544 are available within the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project Budget portion of the 1991 Water Projects Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Change Order No. 8 in the amount of $714,544. It is further recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to execute Change Order No. 8 on behalf of Roanoke County. SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~ ~~~ ,, ~) ~ ~, Cliffo C aig, P. . Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ~ ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-2 OF SUPPORT FOR GRANT APPLICATION FROM ROANORE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU TO THE CENTER ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, economic development is recognized as an essential ingredient in creating jobs, increasing the tax base and raising the quality of life of all Virginians; and WHEREAS, tourism is recognized as an $8 billion industry in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a vital component in economic development; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau promotes tourism throughout the urban and rural region, including the counties of: Botetourt, Craig, Franklin, and Roanoke; the cities of: Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and County of Roanoke have adopted resolutions supporting the Bureau's application for the Virginia Tourism Accreditation Program; and WHEREAS, the top needs of the region include increasing tourism and enhancing regional cooperation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley is becoming known for its recreational activities, scenic vistas, festivals, major events, historic landmarks, and visitor facilities and services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors supports the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau's application to The Center on Rural Development for an innovative grant to implement a new, low band visitor information/highway advisory radio system along the rural area of i i Interstate-81; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the purpose of the grant is to promote rural tourism in an effective, useful, and innovative manner that will result in educating the I-81 traveler about the region he or she is driving through with the ultimate intent of attracting a portion of travelers into the region for economic benefit . On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: i i ( !~ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy R. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Ilene Fitzgerald, CORD Office, The Jackson Center, Richmond, VA Martha Mackey, Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Item No . ~ .2... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau for Support for Grant Application to the Center on Rural Development. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR~B COMMENTS: ~ ~a BACKGROUND: Roanoke County supports the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (RVCVB or Bureau) to promote tourism in the Valley. The County adopted a resolution supporting the Bureaus application for the Virginia Tourism Accreditation Program in March of 1992. The Economic Development Strategy adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 12, 1992 cited the I-81 Corridor as a development opportunity area. The Bureau is applying for a Virginia Center on Rural Development (CORD) grant for the purpose of installing two low-band radio systems along rural stretches of Interstate 81. The low-band AM radio station will be designed to provide non-commercial visitor information on attractions, special events, recreational activities, and nearby visitor services, and will also provide updated highway advisory information, when needed. The systems have a range of 3-5 miles. With appropriate signage, the two systems would provide about 10 minutes of visitor service information from the approximate location of the Roanoke/Botetourt County line to the Dixie Caverns area of I-81. The anticipated results include: (a) increased awareness of the Roanoke Valley as a destination and visitor-friendly location, (b) increased economic impact in the region through visitation, (c) increased regional recognition of the Roanoke Valley, i.e. name recognition. In 1990, an estimated 24 million travelers in passenger vehicles, passed through the Roanoke Valley along I-81. Unofficial counts for 1991 indicate an increase of nearly 4 million travelers along the same stretch of I-81. Reaching only a fraction of these travelers could result in increased tourism and economic benefit in the Roanoke Valley. ~ .. . Roanoke County supports tourism and promotes the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau's grant application to the Center on Rural Development for the purpose of installing a low-band radio system along rural portions of I-81 in Roanoke County. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff has identified $3,000 of public-private partnership funds that could be used as a matching contribution. The radio system will be programmed and operated by the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. If the grant is approved, the staff would provide an update to the Board with any request for the funding from the Economic Development Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County present a resolution to the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau stating the County's support of their grant application to the Center on Rural Development for the promotion of tourism through the installation of a low-band AM radio system. Respectfully submitted: Approved: Timothy W.~_~bala, Director Elmer C. Hodge Director Economic County Administrator ---------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment r~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR GRANT APPLICATION FROM ROANORE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU TO THE CENTER ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, economic development is recognized as an essential ingredient in creating jobs, increasing the tax base and raising the quality of life of all Virginians; and WHEREAS, tourism is recognized as an $8 billion industry in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a vital component in economic development; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau promotes tourism throughout the urban and rural region, including the counties of: Botetourt, Craig, Franklin, and Roanoke; the cities of: Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and County of Roanoke have adopted resolutions supporting the Bureau's application for the Virginia Tourism Accreditation Program; and WHEREAS, the top needs of the region include increasing tourism and enhancing regional cooperation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley is becoming known for its recreational activities, scenic vistas, festivals, major events, historic landmarks, and visitor facilities and services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors supports the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau's application to The Center on Rural Development for an innovative grant to implement a new, low band visitor ~~ information/highway advisory radio system along the rural area of Interstate-81; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the purpose of the grant is to promote rural tourism in an effective, useful, and innovative manner that will result in educating the I-81 traveler about the region he or she is driving through with the ultimate intent of attracting a portion of travelers into the region for economic benefit. ACTION NO. A-92292-3 ITEM NUMBER E` - 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Department of Social Services for a Medicaid Benefit Program Worker Position to be Fully Reimbursed by the State. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~tTt~-rm~*-~C °", " " SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Although Medicaid applications have increased 43 percent since January 1991, staff to process applications in this program has not been expanded. In July 1992, the Roanoke County Department of Social Services, the Virginia Department of Social Services, the Roanoke County Health Department and the State Health Department entered into an agreement (copy attached) which will allow a Medicaid Benefit Program Worker to be placed in the local Health Department. This person would be employed by Roanoke County Social Services and outstationed in the Salem and Vinton Health Departments. This additional staff position would enhance customer service in these Medicaid programs. This worker will have caseload responsibility for pregnant women and two categories of children under the Medically Indigent Medicaid Program. Duties include screening potential applicants, taking applications, obtaining verifications and processing applications in these three program areas. This contract is for one year and this position must be reviewed at the end of that time by Social Services and the Health Department to measure its effectiveness and desired continuance. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the Benefit Program Worker position, including salary, benefits and mileage, will be reimbursed 100 percent by the Virginia Department of Social Services. The Roanoke County Department of Social Services will submit monthly claims, after expenses are incurred, for this reimbursement. Reimbursement would follow in approximately 30 days. The estimated cost of the Benefit Program Worker position is $18,538. This would fund the position from October 1992 through June 1993. z STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation of $18,538 for the employment of the Benefit Program Medicaid Worker with a corresponding increase in our budgeted revenue from the State. Respectfully submitted, Betty McCrary, Ph.D. Director of Social Services Appro ed by,, ~~,~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Betty R. McCrary, Director, Social Services D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS ~y J`jN~99 ~° - . Rod~~~~L ~ ? o e ~a ~. Ossco~~~ ,~;~ ~~ . ~~. tip ~@f~~$$ _ `~ ~. ;, `~ _ ~_ pT.e EMENT.OF ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION STAF `S~b EIVED r~ fa ~ ~ ~( (~ AT DESIGNATED HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ~ { ~~"at~`E~T~NE"~i~ L5 LrJ . ~+. Qax ~t Cc~+mss:ore~ AGREEMENT JUM 2$ 1492 JUN - 5 1992 _ .. Between ,,,. ;felerree tc DEPT OF S0.^.IAL SERVICES ROANOKEREGIONALOFFICE The State Health Department The Virginia Department of Social Services Roanoke County De artment of Social Sezvic • •. - ~ OfitGe of the Bud;et - ~~ JUN 29 1992 ARTICLE I '~ r PURPOSE ~.itC pept. of seC~t`~~ _r-~ This Agreement is entered into as of the date specified below by and between Roanoke County Department of Social Services hereafter referred to as the Local DSS, The State Health Department hereafter referred to as Health Department, and the Virginia Department of Social Services, hereafter referred to as VDSS to locate a Medicaid worker, hereafter referred to as Health _ department eligibility Worker (HDEW), on-site at the Health Department. The Local DSS and the Health Department agree to use the HDEW exclusively for the purpose outlined in this Agreement. The Local DSS is specifically prohibited from using the HDEW for any purpose other than completing cases originating through the Health Department. Effectiveness of this project will be determined by a measurement of~the following criteria: a. Increased reimbursement by Medicaid due to increased Medicaid enrollment when compared to the one year period . immediately prior to the effective date of the contract. b. Increased numbers of medically indigent eligibles enrolled in Medicaid when compared to the one year period immediately prior c. Increased numbers Medicaid within 1~ for Medicaid when immediately prior to the effective date of the contract. of pregnant eligibles enrolled in ~ days of the date of the application compared to the one year period to the effective date of the contract. t, . .- E '~ .. ARTICLE II. FUNCTIONS TO BE PERFORMED BY HDEW A. .Application Acceptance and.Processing Medicaid Applications - Health Department patients referred to the HDEW shall have all the rights and privileges of any other applicant for assistance. Health Department personnel wil l refer for Medicaid eligibility determination all potentially eligible medically indigent patients. a. Eligibility Criteria - Eligibility for Medicaid will be determined using all applicable rules, regulations, and policies governing the general population applying for Medicaid. 1) Each HDEW shall be supplied a copy of the Medicaid Manual by the Local DSS. It~'~shall be the responsibility of each HDEW to keep the Medicaid Manual current with all revising transmittals. 2) All forms necessary to process Medicaid applications shall be ordered by the appropriate local DSS through the usual procedures and made available to the HDEW. b. Case Development -. The HDEW shall process aII Medicaid applications taken at the Local Health Development for pregnant women and children who are residents of the HDEW's locality. Completed cases shall be forwarded daily to the local DSS for immediate enrollment. 1) Applications for patients from other jurisdictions will be forwarded by the HDEW, unprocessed, to the city or county of residence. 2) Medicaid eligibility must be determined in conformity with processing standards contained at Part II, Chapter A, of the Medicaid Manual. Therefore, no local DSS processing procedures shall encumber or delay certifying and enrolling eligible cases. B. Confidentiality of File Information 1. Confidentially of client information contained in existing files (both paper and electronic) is~to be protected, and access to Medicaid eligibility files shall be limited to the HDEWs and Local Departments of Social Services. _ 2 _ ~- -. -- _ .. B. 2. Information released to Health Department personnel shall be limited to information authorized for dissemination in accordance with the applicant Release of Information. It shall be released in a manner consistent with efficiency and non-duplication of effort among the Medicaid, WIC, and medical .services programs. .. 3. Information maintained by or which can be secured by the local DSS shall be shared with the HDEW when necessary to: determine eligibility for Medicaid~under,this Agreement. This includes sDX information and local public records. Health Department Eligibility Workers - Organization 1. ..Caseload Standards. The HDEW shall be an employee of the local DSS but shall not count in the determinations of local staffing needs. 2. Staffing level will be one full time position. This staffing level will be re-evaluated by representatives of the parties to this Agreement after six months of operation to determine its applicability and the need to _ make adjustment. 3. Training - The HDEWs shall be treated as other eligibility .workers as regards provision of Medicaid program training and technical assistance. The HDEW shall undergo training of not more than one week in the local DSS after which time the HDEW shall be on location in the local Health Department. 4. Coverage - HDEW shall be available to take applications at the Local Health Department during Local Health Department's prenatal clinics and at other times agreed to by the Local DSS and Health Department. 5. Performance Standards - Performance Standards applicable to other Medicaid workers shall be the performance standards applicable to the HDEW. 6. Job Classification - The HDEW shall be employed in the same personnel classification and be afforded the same benefits as any other local Medicaid worker in the Local DSS, except that their employment is restricted to the . life of this project. 7. Relationships - The Health Department, the HDEW, and .their employing agencies shall cooperate to the mutual .=- ~ benefit of both by sharing informational materials, - -conducting joint staff meetings, and providing each . ,~~~~worker with periodic reports of work performed such as: `•5. ~~ referrals made, application approvals and costs of - services paid, subject to.the confidentiality ~•-requirements in Article III, ~ B. - 3 - ..~. ~... L ~ ~• .. • 8. Liaison - Each of the parties to this Agreement shall designate a contact person for dissemination of - information about job functions; operating procedures, • and problem resolution. • D. Equipment ~ " 1. The Health Department will provide, at no cost to this project, necessary secure space. and equipment for the eligibility worker, such as desk,. chair,reasonable office supplies, and other furniture and equipment necessary for performance of`the contract.: " 2. The Local DSS.will provide support for purposes of tracking referred patients-and compiling statistical reports in MAPPER. ARTICLE III COSTS A. This project, whereby local workers will be physically located at the Health Department will use funds appropriated to the State Health Department to fund the non-federally matched portion of the costs of maintaining the HDEW. B. Procedures: 1. The Local DSS shall submit monthly to the VDSS individual claims for 100 percent reimbursement of personnel costs for the HDEW. a. Each claim for reimbursement shall be submitted on form DA-20-250, Accounting Voucher. b. Each monthly claim shall be reimbursed by the VDSS at 100 percent of costs. 2. The VDSS shall submit monthly to DMAS, separately identifiable from other federal claims for Medicaid administration reimbursement all claims of administrative expenditures associated with operation of this Agreement. 3. The Health Department agrees to reimburse the VDSS • through an Interagency Transfer of funds for any costs ..for which federal reimbursement does not equal 100 :-percent of such State agency reimbursement made for the Y. •';~month. The Interagency Transfer Invoice will be 'forwarded by the tenth working day~of the month following -: the_ covered period. • - 4 - .~. .. ~ - '- ~ ARTICLE IV - MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS • 1. Administrative Records - Records of administrative costs shall, be maintained separate from other local DSS and Health Department records for evaluation and determination of the ultimate effectiveness of the project. . 2. Applications.- Separate identification shall be maintained of all referrals made by Health. Department personnel to the HDEW. Referrals will be tracked and the outcome recorded as either approved, denied, or failure/refusal to, follow through. 3.. Approved cases. will be.tracked and total expenditures under. Medicaid to the Health Department and other providers will be periodically gathered into reports by Central Office staff. ARTICLE V TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall begin after all parties have signed this Agreement and when personnel have been employed and/or reassigned to the Health Department site. An effectiveness evaluation shall be conducted by representatives of this Agreement after the site has been fully operational for twelve months. After completion of the twelve month effectiveness evaluation, any party to this Agreement may terminate its participation in this project with or without cause upon sixty days notice in writing to the other parties. In Iieu of such action, this Agreement shall remain in effect until modified by mutual consent or operation of law. Interim evaluations, problem identification and resolution sessions will be held quarterly after the first six-month review, on an as needed basis throughout the life of this Agreement.. ~- ,: - _ j,- -,~ . _, ~Y _ ..• .,,,} • ~, - ___. ~.a:r-. - 5 - . .. _` SIGNATURE SHEET . ~ .~ ~ ,. .LY-- Agreement for placement of eligibility worke~/at the Roanoke County/Sales Health Department between: _The State Health Department .The Virginia Department of Social Services ~, Roanoke .o~n v Department of Social Services I hereby agree to theterms of.this agreement: +~ ~ ~ (Signed) La y.D. ackson,.Co mis Toner tate Department of Social Services . (Dated) (Signed) Betty R. McCrary. Ph.D. , Dire~or Roanoke County Department of Social Services (Dated) ~ ~~~`l/c~' ~J `-tr-t--- ( Signed ) Robert Stroube, M.D. State Health Commissioner State Health Department G L3 SY ~ (Dated). . ~ ~~ ~~ (Signed) Margaret L. agan, M. Alleghany alth Director ~ . ~_C//`7,-~~ ~ (Dated) _ 6 _ -. ACTION NO. A-92292-4 ITEM NO. ~'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Recommendation to Implement Removal, Remedial and Closure of Dixie Caverns Landfill COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: Th i s i s a request for funding of an existing vacant position. The work cannot be absorbed by the staff without serious impact on other critical projects. The Board should either fund the request or contract for these services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This report was originally submitted to the Board on September 8, 1992. At that time the Board requested additional information with respect to projected costs for outside consultants to peform these services. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the hiring of additional County staff and the purchase of equipment to perform the actions necessary to implement the removal, remedial and closure actions required for Dixie Caverns landfill as required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . BACKGROUND' On August 12, 1992 the Board of Supervisors authorized the execution of an Administrative Order by Consent for Removal Action." This Removal Consent Order will address the contaminated stream sediment and soil. The effective date of this Order is August 28, 1992. In September of 1992, the County will be required to execute a Consent Decree, which will address the flyash pile. The purpose of this action is to achieve a final, permanent remedy to this problem. While implementing both the Removal Consent Order and the Remedial Consent Decree, the County will work closely with Roanoke Electric Steel (RES) to achieve a reasonable, safe and effective solution to these environmental problems, in accordance with the cost-sharing agreement approved on August 12, 1992. Finally when these are completed to the satisfaction of EPA, the County shall commence the closure of the sanitary landfill in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. The 1992 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted legislation providing a "window of opportunity" until October of 1993 to ~~~ achieve closure in accordance with the less stringent federal (Sub- title D of RCRA) regulations. Funds for the closure are included in the November 3, 1992 bond referendum. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Engineering Department and George W. Simpson, III, P.E. have been designated as "Project Coordinator" for these three projects. County resources and personnel have been reallocated to this department to handle the increased workload. At this time staff believes that County resources and personnel can best be utilized in a construction or project management, oversight and inspection role, coordinating the work of outside contractors and subcontractors. It is anticipated that handling these projects "in-house" in this manner will result in significant savings of taxpayer funds. The nature, scope and timing of these critical Dixie Caverns projects, and the allocation of County personnel to implement these projects, may result in delays in implementing other projects assigned to the Engineering Department. This recommendation to implement the removal, remedial, and closure actions at Dixie Caverns includes the following: - role of County staff: construction project management and inspection; - hire Olver, Inc. to provide engineering design, prepara- tion of EPA required work plans, technical support for removal and remedial projects; - authorization to hire contractors and subcontractors to perform work required; - authorization to hire additional County personnel (one additional employee to oversee contractors, inspect and direct all construction activities, insure that local, state and federal regulations are complied with, make field decisions, document removal activities, and maintain accurate records); this position would be a "Construction Inspector;" and purchase required equip- ment (one additional four-wheel drive vehicle and safety equipment). - commitment to appropriate additional funds as required to accomplish these projects. ~ ""~ FISCAL IMPACTS' On August 12, 1992, the Board appropriated $100,000 to accomplish the purposes of the Removal Consent Order. Staff will return to the Board for additional appropriations as necessary. Staff estimates the following additional costs at this time: Construction inspector Four-wheel drive vehicle Safety training and equipment $38,000 (salary and fringe benefits ) 16,000 1,000 Mr. Simpson has gathered the additional information requested by the Board for outside consultant costs to handle these responsi- bilities. It is difficult to give exact figures due to the nature of the project. The scope and projected costs are not well defined and there are many variables that will come in to play during the project. One way to look at projected costs of construction management are to consider our best guess of total project costs - in the range of $4,000,000 to $9,000,000. Based on "Means Building Construction Cost Data", fees for construction management should be in the range of 2.5~ to 4.0~. This would result in a range of fees of $100,000 to $360,000 (see attached copy from Means). Another way to look at projected costs is based on a per hour basis for consulting engineers to provide this service (see attached rate schedule). As you can see, the cost of a resident inspector for the project would be $72,800 per year, not including reimbursable expenses (i.e. travel, supplies, etc.). The rate schedule also gives you a good idea of some of the hourly costs that would be associated with managing this type of project on a contract basis-from the project administrator on down to secretari- al time. Also note the costs of reimbursable expenses. Perhaps the best way to make a valid comparison of the projected costs for construction management is to look at the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project and what we are spending in consulting fees (see copy of summary). Direct costs are multiplied by a factor of 2.75 to obtain billing rates. For a resident project representative the cost would be $17.42 x 2.75 = $47.51 per hour. Additionally, all reimbursable expenses are billed at 110 of actual costs. Note under reimbursable expenses the travel expense of $18,257.44 that will also be billed at 110%, or $20,083.18. The total construction phase services proposal amounts to $1,800,000 for this project. For these reasons staff believes that it is far more cost effective and efficient to handle this project "in-house". ~-( ALTERNATIVES' 1) Construction project management and inspection by Engineering Department, with additional staff and equipment as necessary, to implement the removal, remedial, and closure projects at Dixie Caverns landfill. 2) Retain outside consultants to handle all phases of the removal, remedial, and closure projects at Dixie Caverns landfill. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ b ~ ~~ ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to Action Vote No Yes Abstain (~ Motion by Harry c. Ni_ckens _ Eddy x ( ) t~ aLZ rnvE? addi_ i~nal ff Johnson ( ) in~itinn and Pzl~i=m _n t_. Alt #1 Kohinke Nickens x Minnix x cc: File c:\wp51\agenda\dixie\proj.rpt Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utilities D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget MEANS BUILDING COST DA ATION 1991 49th Annual Edition _` ~ ~! ;~ 1~ ------- -- ~. `---~ ..- ,. ~ . .~._ . ,~ .1Yr V(~ ' ~ ~~. ~1. ,~r r_• ~ ~K '~~~ ;_'~ .. .,.~...~....-.. - k, ~ f~~ ', , • ~ DAILY MAN• BARE COSTS TOTAL 010 000 ~ Overhead CREW OUTPUT HOURS UNIT MAT. LA80R EQUIP. TOTAL I NCL 0&P 004 0011 ARCHITECTURAL FEES .~O _ 0 0 0020 For new construction _ 0060 Minimum Proj ect -- 4.90% 0090 Maximum 16% 0100 For alteration work, to $500,000, add to fee 50% 0150 Over $500,000, add to fee 2~/0 012 0010 CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX (Appendix) for 162 major U.S. and 01 0020 Canadian cities, total cost, min. (Greensboro, NC) % 78.60% 0050 Average 100% 0100 Maximum (Anchorage, AID 127% 014 0010 CONSTRUCTION ECONOMIES For bricklaying so 01 016 0010 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEES $1,000,000 job, minimum Pro ject 4.50/0 01 0050 Maximum 7.50% 0300 $5,000,000 job, minimum 2.50% 0350 Ma~amum 4% 018 0010 CONSTRUCTION TIME Requirements O 01 020 0010 CONTINGENCIES Allowance to add at conceptual stage Pro ject 15% 02 0050 Schematic stage 1~/0 0100 Preliminary working drawing stage 7% 0150 Final working drawing stage p/0 022 0010 CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT See division 016 13 11 02 024 0010 CREWS For building construction, see How To Use This Book 02 028 0010 ENGINEERING FEES Educational planning consultant, minimum Project .50% 02 0100 Maximum 2.50% 0200 Electrical, minimum 11 Contrct 4.10% 10.10% 0300 Maximum 0400 Elevator & conveying systems, minimum 2.50% 5% 0500 Maximum 8% 0600 Food service & kitchen equipment, minimum 12% 0700 Maxmum 0800 Landscaping & site development, minimum 2.50% g% 0900 Maximum 4 10% 1000 Mechanical (plumbing & HVAC), minimum ' 10.10% 1100 Maximum 1% 1200 Structural, minimum Project " 2.50% 1300 Maximum 0: 034 0010 FIELD OFFICE EXPENSE 50 148 0100 Office equipment rental, average Month 135 . 0120 Office supplies, average " 250 275 0125 Office trailer rental, see division 015-904 0140 Telephone bill; avg. bilVmonth incl. long dist. Month 225 247.5 0 0160 Field office lights & HVAC 78 85.8 30 0 0: 036 0010 FIELD PERSONNEL Clerk average Week 215 215 3 0100 Field engineer, minimum 505 505 765 .670 670 1,020 0120 Average 755 755 1,150 0140 Maximum 695 695 1,060 0160 General purpose laborer, average 955 955 1,450 0180 Project manager, minimum 065 1 620 1 1,065 , , 0200 Average 1,210 1,210 1,840 0220 Maximum 905 905 1,380 0240 0260 Superintendent, minimum e Avera 1,005 1,005 1,530 g 135 1 725 1 1,135 , , 0280 Maximum 585 585 890 0290 Timekeep°r, average 1 ,. ~2 02: 2~ PM ~pLVER P16 LC- R ATF. SCHEDULE PROJECT ADIvtINISTRATOR 100.00 00 90 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER . 65,00 PROJECT MANAGER 00 55 SENIOR PR03ECT ENGINEER . 00 50 PROJECT ENGINEER - 1 . 45.00 PROJECT ENGINEER - 2 00 40 PROCESS ENGINEER - 1 . 35A0 PROCESS ENGINEER - 2 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES IvIANAGER 50.00 , STRUCTURAL ENGINEER b0.00 50.00 HYI3ROGEOLOGIST 35.00 GEOLOGIST RESIDENT INSPECTOR - 1 35.00 RESIDENT I.NSPECTi~R ' Z 35.00 00 45 ENGINEERINCr TECHNICIAN , 00 65 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER . 50.00 SURVEYOR 00 3 SURVEY PARTY CHIEF ' 00 25 St1RVEYING ASSISTANT . 00 b5 TWO-MAN SURVEY CREW . 00 75 THREE-MAN SURVEY CREW . 00 35 5ENIdR FIELD TECHNICIAN ' 25.00 FIELD TECHNICIAN 00 30 DESIGNER-DRAFTSMAN . 25.00 DRAFTSMAN 20.00 CADD TIME ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 35.00 25.()0 ACCQUN'I'iNG 25.00 WORD PROCESSOR 20.00 SECRETARY SENIOR LAB TECHNICIAN 3t) 00 LABORATORY TECHNICIAN 25.t)q 1)0 50 MANAGER, ENVIRONMENTAL B10Lt7GY . 00 45 LABgRATt7RY DIRECTOR . 00 25 INFORMATIC?N SPECIALIST , REPRQDUtrTIQNlIv[AiLTNG CdST + 1{~% COST' + 10% PRINTSlPLANS COST + 10% TRAVELS 0.35/MILE MILEAGE SUBCONTRACT SERVICES: COST + 10% GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES August 1992 i3 r. ~ . t r r, ~' FEE PROPOSAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Spring Hollow Reservoir COUNTY OF ROANOKE Roanoke, Virginia HSMM COMMISSION NO. 4194 22 AUGUST 1991 (Revised 29 October 1991) ~-`~ O ~p ..p I M T O i Lh -N p O N Lh 1 O D~ O 1 ti l C p ~..~ M I Q Lh O 1 0 r ti O o ti Q' 1 +-1 m O I Lh t m a ~ as c~ n+ a. .~o O ~ rri L? 07 m I N 07 O I O ~ ro r0 opt Lh 1IF 1 /~ rl m 1 0 dfF~M1 1 03 ~ 1 1 ~ rl 1 .-1 1 ri AF {ry 1 LF 1 Yf ° ° i w° i ao c o O o o~ w i o L~ 0 1 I P-1t4 Lh 1 i Q YY i 1 i 1ti 1 1 ^ r-1 N P J O~ d Q ri ti to = ~ d W Ii W ~" ^ W t-- J v p pr H 11 ~ W q p~ p IY N 11 U r.~ U ^ H V V It O q y H O D it N O r.N HDC h- V P W ii q J G q ~ W N F- 11 . J ¢ rt CD HXp~O = II W X^ '"'M J O W rl W r+ 1! N ~-+ W = H OyQ-~-r-' Nil W WXX pW YA WW O W it 0. Warr HW L ~X OCJ N'/ipW X0. W II J U X W X3H rrp S J . q~-• J -~ ^ 6 ,'~: W W G 6i CS O q 1! 1-- II D to J p N X J DC 6 l~ 4. tS X 6 1-- l- ~? O 0. x r-i Q W6C.C ~ ~W O ~. ~ ~Y+ OX~O~ ~ i! p /- J ~-+ d 1-- J G~'.d C'i Y V J p V7 rl 11 it la OC t) W X r+ S V W X S = C.7 }' H k ~,,,1 ~r f/1 p~..~F .. O II O 6OGW N QB+W N fN W rr CD SC~>Cy If Gi 17C6CW OCgG Gd OC II J XZICq XS= ~ =J J CD OCG X F-- U= q ii 0 4» 2 p t» t:1: C 6 rrH Q = II = f/1JtL C.I ' ~t%aJ X WX -- IyXW . , O = p GC ¢ p p~G~leN H U _ 0. ~ NC~gN N 11 S N ~wc~ _Q Q ~4 0 .-1 O O r•1 ~11~ 1- 11 47mrIP-001~0 1 N m t Vi 11 Q'00 I~b~00v70 ~ m 1 i V 11 P- O~ b 1~ ~4 it N O i m .-i 1 ii ri O~i Q e-1 OD ~O ~O Q i N Q 1 11 N rl r7 +~'11~• Q b. r0 i O O 1 u mooovvL-~v 1 c' n- t 11 mQ•OOQ• m 1 ~O m 1 {nu-.-1.-1 i m VO i u i~ ii W ti i` OD N N L"l OD rD O F- it r-I OO Q Q W 00 i~ O ¢ ii DG 11 N~4 h~/~NCOO OD !1 4 N ~-1 r-1 C•i ri 1!t iR 11 ~fh ih it- iM1 •,IF YY 1 11 t! th 11 aC 11 O 11 OL'70~1~00-i0 i N S 1! Op~Q4'.,pOppm 1 ~O X II ODQI~--~O'~m~Om 1 O 6 11 rl L'7 L7 rl Q ri 1 N = ii O~ J O~ 6 ri y O aC 1 TL. W W L7 aG O ~ ~-+ ~' ri ~ r, U ~ y O ~~ , w a ~, x ~+ W N !-- W a~~Q II 11 Qth p~ Q~ ~} II ii OC W DC p W ri W y tl 11 -- OC C 'yQ'y F- V 11 Ii II yO. H r.ti W F- 04 aG .-.~ W W • ~ i C3 it II X aC DC -~' ~•-~ 1+ 6 J y th G W C~ 11 li II ~ O V X 11 )C !-- F-• W 6 - C7 - W 6 X X acs z n u ncccsc+r--+-+r a~ -- D_Xr•i = U 11 W6WWr+6~¢X a- 6.7 OX~-+O~ S aC 11 it ¢XOyVX~"~N O DC JOyri G II 11 XGOCXOC=aCW J Z ~'-~ J ..n Va LL -l'~ II ii 6r-~G.r-.¢CIWOC ¢ ¢ G p r.. ~-+ 1-- SUty O Q 11 J tl II = F~' 1. W J V F~ T 11 C.~1-M^aG M-C~W ~ A J /~ Lq aC O CO aC 1-- 11 O 11 V GG W W W X W /Y+ W O Sl--C.]= ¢ U 11 Cb 11 WF--6GXCD t.~C = S H y 6 = W ti W 11 ~ t/1 ~ r'+ H ~"" °"~ J y dC f' gGYW Z at II F- II OX(A VJ tdylr.W W dp~yN O -~ it 6 II OGGW WXW4. -+ O U~V¢N t/! C II K3 it CVOL aGWDDL~ O W I N Q I ~4 i Q l Q OO I N I . 1 i 1 m t w N i .i 1 b t N Q 1 1~ 1 m t c o. l m l ~. 1 i •. 1 OD t Q~ m l m l m l m O i 4 1 N• 1 O r-1 1 r-1 1 i 1R 1 1 1 ~-1 1 ~-{ 1 ! YF 1 ~!! 1 QO QO L'a O 1 O~ O+ 1 QN 00 N O ; W L7 ; (ti. ri O L^~ N O I L7 f~ I L7 P. L7 N /~ O i I` CO i N Q 1`. W L ' ~ ~ 4 O? W YF YF f l 7 m 1 .y u- ut 1 m 1 ~ i i ~~ .D t ~ ~ (A '~ O ^. W p ~ O y X 11 W • L'~ W 11 X L7 N L7 a" y it ONYT N % W I! Z itF W YY y W th it d XCD W X it WX 6X y y X ~ d It W f/J t/i m W W ¢ X 11 F-f/JpOm ~- y W 11 W= ~4y W O W D v W U xt3 m A O ~ d O J 11 C7XOm X~COW J X ¢ } /Y+11 r+Qmv¢ WV ¢ X W JUZ^ 6 tl F- F- v Z^ X 1•- C~i 11 f3 f/.r Wtd t/!¢¢ O J J J W J CL II ~ rw p V X Ci J 3 Y••~ ¢ 6 6 GO ¢ ~ 11 J CS D J r-. ra = J O 8+ !- F- 1- X 1- 4'+ 11 WC W4.~ WJ = O O p ~"~ p ~ ii O DC O ~-r i+. d m U J to F- t- F- S H ~ II Q a~ zir.O ~-r m VJ 6 ~ = C7 W it aC W O S ~"•~ y V DL II !- aL J y >C y ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Reconsider Use of the Roanoke Center Community Room COUNTY~JADMINISTRATOR' S COMM/EJNTS : ~~,,~..~,~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Revising the Policy for County Administration lJ At their meeting on September 8, 1992, the Board of Supervisors voted 3 to 2 to retain the current policies for use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room. Supervisor Kohinke, who voted on the prevailing side, has requested that the Board reconsider this issue. Attached is a the previous board report and Chairman Eddy's memorandum of September 8, 1992 that outlines his suggested revisions. The current $50.00 fee for civic, political, educational, cultural, religious and social groups is intended to cover the costs to process the application by the Clerk's Office, the setup and cleanup of the room by the custodial staff, lighting, heating and air conditioning costs, and the use of special equipment such as the kitchen and sound equipment. The Schools currently assess a separate charge for these expenses in addition to the rental fee. The proposed $100 deposit would create additional work for the staff and would offset none of the actual costs. The Clerk's Office would be responsible for issuing a receipt and sending the check through the Treasurer's Office for deposit. After 30 days, a request for a check would be issued through the Finance Department, and the check would then be mailed to the organization, resulting in additional staff time and paperwork. Staff is also concerned about security and the possibility of damage to the kitchen, the new personal computer equipment, the sound system, and other equipment. Because of the fire exit through the kitchen, the doors at the kitchen and into the County Administrator's Office cannot be locked. Under the current policy, the Community Room is not used very often by outside organizations. However, changes to the policy could increase the use and therefore increase the potential for damage. t STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~" Staff recommends that there be no change to the current policy and that the policy approved on September 8, 1992 be maintained. Submitted by: Mary H. Allen, CMC ~~~ Clerk to the Board Approved by: a Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~~ o~ ~iuar: kF ~• ~ p z a 1 38 (~~ixxt#g ~# ~.~~xx~.~~~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 MEMORANDUM K131-92 TO: FROM: DATE: Lee Eddy BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MI Fa MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL `FUZZY MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Edward Kohinke /~ ~i~~~ / ~, Catawba District Supervisor September 10, 1992 SUBJECT: ITEM D-2 ON THE SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 AGENDA (REQUEST TO REVISE POLICY FOR USE OF COMMUNITY ROOM) I request the subject item be placed on the agenda for September 22, 1992 for a reconsideration vote. Now that I have had a chance to read and digest your memo (which I received just prior to the September 8th meeting), I want to vote "no" to alternative 1 and vote "yes" to an alternative which incorporates the proposal which you have made. Sorry, but I am no speed reader, and I always need plenty of time to think things over before making a final decision. EGK/bjh cc: Members, Board of Supervisors Elmer Hodge Mary Allen ®Recyded Paper ~-~ MEMO - 9/8/92 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: Use of RCAC Community Room After reviewing the staff report on use of the non-governmental groups, I have not changed my think a few other modifications are in order: Community Room by general position, but do 1. It does seem reasonable to require a damage deposit, say $100, payable 14 days in advance and refundable after the event. This should tend to limit use to responsible groups. It would also ensure that funds would be available to pay custodial fees. 2. A custodial fee of $15.00 per hour is reasonable for Saturday and Sunday use, when no janitor is normally in the building. However, the fee should remain at $10.00 per hour for weekday nights when a janitor is normally in the building anyway. 3. Rather than assess a use fee of $50.00 for cultural, religious or social groups, I suggest adopting a policy that would not allow use of the room for these purposes at all, to avoid the possible charge of fee discrimination raised by the County Attorney. 4. In regard to need of the room by government after it has been scheduled to another group, I suggest that reservations be rescindable up to 14 days in advance of the scheduled date, for good cause, by the County Administrator, and up to one day in advance of the scheduled date by the Board Chairman. These provisions could be incorporated by changing existing resolution 32889-S.b as follows: Rule l.D: Non-governmental: Civic, political and educational groups (application necesary); use allowed only between 7 pm and 11 pm Monday through Friday and between 8 am and 11 pm Saturday or Sunday. Damage deposit of $100.00 required 14 days in advance of the event, refundable (less the cost of repairing any damage) 30 days after the event. Rule 2: Delete. Rule 6: Omit reference to Rule 2.A. Rule 12: Omit reference to Rule 2.A. Change to apply $10/hour janitor fee for non-governmental events (Rule 1.D) held between 7 pm and 11 pm Monday through Friday, and $15/hour for Saturday and Sunday. Rule 15: Change to the following: "Scheduled use may be rescinded or altered by the County Administrator up to 14 days prior to a scheduled event, to allow use for essential governmental purposes. Scheduled use may be altered or rescinded by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors until 24 hours prior to the scheduled event, to allow use for essential or emergency governmental purposes. In case of any change, the originavy scheduled organization shall be notified immediately. copy: Elmer Hodge, Paul Mahoney, Brenda Holton '~ ACTION NO. 9892-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 8, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Revise Policy for Use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room COIINTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: On March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 83-43 which established a policy for the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room. On March 28, 1989, the Board of Supervisors rescinded Resolution 83-43 and adopted a new policy under Resolution 32889-5.b. The new policy provided more detailed written procedures to address problems that had arisen over use of the room and also included a fee schedule to help defray the costs of making this facility available to the public for non- governmental activities. SIIMMARY OF INFORMATION: Listed below are the current rules for use of the Community Room Permitted use of the room (in priority order~• A. Board of Supervisors - NO FEE B. Roanoke County: Departments, Employees, Agencies, Committees and Commissions - NO FEE C. State and Federal Government: Officials and Agencies - NO FEE D. Non-governmental: Civic, Cultural, Political, Religious and Educational (Application Necessary) - $50.00 per day There is a $10.00 per hour custodial fee after 5:00 p.m. and on Saturday or Sunday. Permitted IIses When Approved by the Board o_f Supervisors A. Social Gatherings (Application Necessary) - $50.00 per day Prohibited IIses: A. Commercial Uses B. Fund Raising Uses ~~~ Staff has contacted other County departments and local governments for their fee schedules and a list of those charges is attached (ATTACHMENT A). There seems to be no consistent policy within the County. The Librarv meeting rooms are available for use free of charge during the hours the libraries are open to the public: Monday - Thursday 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Friday and Saturdays, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The Library prohibits use of the meeting rooms for religious, social, fund raising or other commercial purposes. The Parks and Recreation Department charges a minimum of $50.00 for two hours plus a $50.00 refundable damage deposit. However, they waive all fees for recreation organizations, but would not waive the fee for civic and cultural organizations unless the purpose of the meeting related specifically to parks or recreation. The Schools have a detailed policy for use of school buildings. Examples of charges are: (1) All school functions and PTA meetings: no charge; (2) Civic Leagues would be charged no fee as long as the meeting was open to the general public; but would be charged for janitorial costs if the meeting was held other than normal hours; (3) County political, social, and religious organizations (Examples: Republican and Democratic Parties) are charged $50.00 plus janitorial fee, plus additional charges for use of air conditioning, sound systems and audiovisual equipment. Supervisor Eddy has suggested that the Community Room fee be waived for civic, political or education groups using the facility after normal working hours on Monday through Friday or between 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday. He further recommended that such waivers not be granted to any one organization more than four times in any one calendar year. The Community Room has been used extensively during the evening hours over the past three years. Attached is a table showing the usage (ATTACHMENT B). Several times when organizations have used the community room, there have been instances of damage to such things as the sound system, the rest rooms and the community room floor. There have also been instances when County departments have requested the use of the room for such events as community meetings, but the room was previously reserved by another organization. While the County has first priority, we make every effort not to ask other organizations to change their plans. If the current rules are relaxed, there is a greater possibility for damage and less opportunity for the County of Roanoke to reserve the room for its own use. The County Attorney's Office also recommends that if the fee is waived for civic, political and education groups, it should also be waived for cultural and religious organizations, or the fee could be considered discriminatory. As the Board may recall, several years ago, the Board rescinded the waiver of Bingo and Raffle ~~~~ _~ Permit fees because of its possible discriminatory impact. However, if the Board decides to provide for a waiver, I would ask that it be done on a case by case basis by the Board of Supervisors. Staff recommends that the use policy not be changed. We can recall only two problems with the current policy in the past five years and see no reason to change. The current policy is fair to all organizations, consistent, nondiscriminatory and covers the actual costs to use the Community Room. Staff further recommends increasing the custodial fee from $10.00 to $15.00 to reflect the actual overtime cost for janitorial services. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Keep the policy as it currently stands under resolution 32889- 5.b. A $50.00 fee would be charged for civic, cultural, political, religious and education groups using the facility. However, staff recommends increasing the custodial fee from $10.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour. 2. Change the policy as Supervisor Eddy has suggested, and authorize the Board of Supervisors to waive the $50.00 fee for civic, political and education groups using the facility between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, or between 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Saturday or Sunday. Such waivers shall not be granted to any one organization more than four times in any one calendar year. Additionally, staff recommends increasing the custodial fee from $10.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour. 3. Change the policy to require a 550.00 deposit for civic cultural, political, religious and education groups. This deposit would be returned after 30 days, less any costs for cleaning or repair to the room or equipment. The fee may be waived by action of the Board of Supervisors only. This is similar to a deposit fee charged by the Parks and Recreation Department. Increase the custodial fee from $10.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alterative #1, that the policy remain the same. Staff further recommends that the custodial fee be increased from $10.00 to $15.00 per hour to reflect the actual overtime costs for janitorial services. ~~ e~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator .c'~'~-J ------------- ---------------------- ACTION --------- -------------------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) motion to keep policv as it Eddy x Received ( ) currently stands Alt #1 with Johnson x Referred ( ) increase in custodial fee Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x x Nicke ns cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Hicks, Policy Manual Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board ~~~~~ SALEM ATTAC~NT A Salem Civic Center ;~ ~,,q Meeting room are rented, Mon -Sun, 8 am until, by the event scheduled, number of people or catering (if catered, no rent charged). If you request use of equipment such as VCR, TV, etc., there is a charge. Parlors which hold up to 100 people rent for $50 (8 am - 3 pm) and $60 (all day or after 3 pm - ). Community Room for 600 people, three sections 200 each, $125 section, or $300 for entire room. Arena rents for $1,200 to $1,500 average. Local, state, and federal government groups are charged one-half price. City of Salem is not charged a fee and Civic Center refers private groups who ask for a reduced rate to Salem City Manager's office for his determination. ROANOKE CITY Roanoke City Municipal Bnil Council Chamber and Conference Room are available Mon -Fri, 8 am - 11 pm, at no charge for local, state or federal government groups. Private groups are permitted without charge at the discretion of the Clerk to the Council. Religious groups are prohibited. The other departments with meeting rooms follow the same guidelines. Roanoke City Parks & Recreation Department Shelters - 1J2 day $25 City Resident/$35 for Non-City Resident; All Day $35 City/$45 Non-City. Centers - $35/hr City/$45/Non-City with $20 each additional hour. Mountain View - $75/first hour and $40 each additional hour. Contingent upon space and center already being open, they will waive the rental fee for the centers for neighborhood groups and ask for operating costs only, minimum two hours at $5/hour. They are in the process of reviewing their guidelines on rentals. ROANORE COUNTY Roanoke County Schools Order of priorities for use of school buildings and grounds when not otherwise in use: (1) Schools and PTA - no charge (2) County Parks & Recreation - no charge but subject to janitor service fees (3) Community Groups, two categories, at varying charges ($10 to $150) depending on space used and subject to janitor's fees and additional charges (4) Institutions of IIigher Learning -$25/semester hour. Roanoke County Parks & Rey-reation Shelters - Private/Non-Profit 1/2 day $15-$20 and all day $25-$35; Corporate 1/2 day $30-$40 and all day $50- $70 Centers - $50 deposit plus $50/two hours and $25/per hour for each additional hour. Two hour minimum. No additional charge for City residents. Roanoke County library Library meeting rooms are available at no charge during the hours the libraries are open to the public (Mon - Thurs 9 am -9 pm, Fri -Sat 9 am - 5 pm). They can be used for public gatherings of a civic, cultural or educational nature but not religious, social, fund raising, or other commercial use. Roanoke County Community Room Order of priorities: (1) Board of Supervisors - no fee (2) Roanoke County Departments: Employees, Agencies, Committees and Commissions - no fee (3) State and Federal Government: Officials and Agencies - no fee (4) Non-Governmental: Civic, Cultural, Political, Religious, and Educational - $50/day and $10/hr custodial fee Sat/Sun and after 5 pm M-F (5) Social Gatherings - $50/day and $10/hr custodial fee with approval by Board action. Commercial and fund raising uses are prohibited. ATTACHMENT B TABLE SHOWING USAGE OF CO TY ROOM 1990, 1991, AND THROUGH AUGUST 31, 1992 1990 1991 1992 Number of Weeks 52 52 34 Number of Days (Mon - Fri) 260 260 170 (Mon - Sat) 312 312 204 Evening Uses (Mon - Fri) 101 98 76 (Mon - Sat) 104 100 gp Avg Uses Per Week (Mon - Fri) 1.94 1.88 2.24 (Mon - Sat) 2.00 1.92 2.35 % Utilization (Mon - Fri) 38.85% 37.69% 44.71% (Mon - Sat) 33.33 32.05 39.22 .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE~L~ 2. COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 32889-5.b AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 83-43 AND ADOPTING A POLICY FOR USE OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COMMUNITY ROOM, AND AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES AND REGULATIONS AND A FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, on March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Resolution No. 83-43 establish- ing a policy for the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room; and WHEREAS, occasions over the past years have arisen which indicate a need for a more detailed policy to assist the County Administrator and staff to address questions relating to the use of this facility. NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution No. 83-43 is hereby rescinded. 2. That the following rules and regulations governing the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room are hereby adopted: Rule 1. Permitted Use (in order of priority) and Fee Schedule A. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County - No Fee B. Roanoke County: Departments, Employees, Agencies, Committees, and Commissions - No Fee C. State and Federal Government: Officials and Agen- cies - No Fee ~ ~~ D. Non- overnment ~~%~~ 9 al: Civic, Cultural, Political, Religious, and Educational Groups (Application Necessary) -, $50/Day Rule 2. Permitted Uses As Approved by the Board of Supervisors A. Social Gatherings (Application Necessary) - $50/Day Rule 3. Prohibited Uses A. Commercial uses B. Fund-raising uses Rule 4. No smoking or alcoholic beverages allowed Rule 5. Groups are not to charge admission or ask for donations at any meeting. Rule 6. An "Application for Use of the Roanoke County Community Room" must be completed as soon as possible prior to the date of the event for use by 1D and 2A only. Approval will be by letter. Rule 7. Applications can be obtained from the following: Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone: 772-2005 Rule 8. Organizations holding meetings assume responsibility for any damage to room or contents. The room must be left in a neat and orderly condition. If additional cleanup is required, the organization will be notified and charged for this service. The organization will 2 ' ,, "W` indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County from any a~ nd all claims for damages or injuries arising out of the use of the Community Room. Rule 9. Neither the name nor the address of the Roanoke County Administration Center may be used as the official address or headquarters of an organization. Rule 10. No additional furniture or equipment other than that situated in the Community Room is to be used without approval. Rule 11. Use of other equipment is a "Special Request" and per- mission must be granted in advance. Rule 12. If the Non-Governmental event (1D or 2A) is held before or after normal working hours (8 a.m. until 5 p.m.) of the Administration Center, custodial services will be arranged for and paid to Roanoke .County General Ser- vices Department at the rate of $10/hour. Rule 13. The person requesting the permit for use of the Commun- ity Room assumes the responsibility for adherence to "Regulations and Rules for Use of the Community Room," and either that person or a person especially desig- nated will be present during the time requested. Rule 14. These rules are subject to change by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The County Administrator is auth- orized by the Board to develop additional rules and regulations concerning the use, scheduling, and opera- tion of the Community Room, which are not inconsistent herewith. 3 Special Note: Rule 15. The Roan right to scheduled purposes. 3. That April 1, 1989. eke County Board of Supervisors reserves the alter or amend any previously approved or use of the Community Room for governmental the effective date of this Resolution is On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTS: cc: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Hicks, Policy Manual Constitutional Officers Assistant County Administrators Department Heads 4 L--"- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-5 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("County") and the School Board of the County have determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring land necessary for a new high school for the County ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.103-18. 2. That the Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the School Board of the County to pay the costs of acquiring the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such purpose is $750,000. 3. That beginning no later that 30 days after the adoption of this resolution and ending on the date on which the debt or other financing is issued, this resolution will be reasonably available for inspection by the general public during normal business hours, at the office of the County Administrator. 1 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: -~r~Q;~,.~-. -~'d. Q,t,c-c~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools 2 ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PRO- CEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("County") and the School Board of the County have determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring land necessary for a new high school for the County ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.103-18. 2. That the Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the School Board of the County to pay the costs of acquiring the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such purpose is $750,000. 3. That beginning no later that 30 days after the adoption of this resolution and ending on the date on which the debt or other financing is issued, this resolution will be reasonably available for inspection by the general public during normal business hours, at the office of the County Administrator. 1 L_ ! ~iD 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. c:\wp51 \agenda\general\reimbwse.rso ACTION NO. A-92292-6 ITEM NUMBER ~- r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Extend Valley Metro Service into Roanoke County COUNT//Y,, ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ,.ci .~ C~-ys.a-~ct~ ,~1+a ~~~ The County of Roanoke recently received requests from residents and businesses to extend two of Valley Metro's routes into Roanoke County. The first would be along Brambleton Avenue from its present termination point on Red Rock Road near Wilson's Restaurant to a point beyond Brambleton Corporate Center to serve the needs of the Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services. A second request is to extend the route along Williamson Road to serve Hollins Manor Home for Adults. Outlined below is a history of the County's participation with Valley Metro for routes within the County, alternatives for meeting these requests for additional service and the needs of the residents. BACKGROUND' Valley Metro is operated by the greater Roanoke Transit Company to provide local mass transit facilities to the residents of the City of Roanoke and to certain other areas as contracted by adjoining localities. The formula for determining the adjoining localities' subsidy is outlined below: route miles in the Locality x Variable Cost per mile [ 1 75J) Revenue 2 *Plus an estimate of the cost to extend STAR service as required. In addition to this subsidy, the Fixed Route Service offered by Valley Metro has been expanded as a result of the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide Specialized Transit Service (STAR) for disabled persons. The locality would likewise be billed for 50% of the cost of this service. ~: ~! Currently, Valley Metro extends two routes into Roanoke County. The first extends from Avenham Avenue to Tanglewood Mall and back into the City utilizing Ogden Road and Colonial Avenue. A second route follows Hershberger Road to Edinburgh Square and back into the City using Plantation Road. Based upon current ridership, a modest profit is realized by Valley Metro from the Tanglewood route to offset the expense of the Edinburgh Square route so that the County has not had to subsidize these two routes. From November, 1987 through July, 1989, Valley Metro also operated an extension along Brambleton Avenue from its terminus beside Wilson's Restaurant to Postal Drive (at the Roanoke Orthopedic Center). At the time this route was terminated there were approximately 1,900 passengers annually requiring a subsidy from Roanoke County in the amount of $30,181. The Board of Supervisors voted on April 25, 1989, to discontinue. Requests for New Services• Extension along Brambleton Avenue to the Brambleton Corporate Center Requests have been made to extend Valley Metro service along Brambleton Avenue to the Brambleton Corporate Center. The least expensive route, as designated by Valley Metro, would require a subsidy for basic service of approximately $4,500 per year. Also required will be the removal of nine parking spaces and the relocation of three others at the Brambleton Corporate Center to allow the safe maneuvering of the buses. Other alternatives were considered; however, they are more costly because many of the side streets are not large enough to accommodate the width of the bus, particularly when meeting other large vehicles. In addition to the subsidy for basic service, the County would also be responsible for 50~ of the cost of expanding STAR service to the extended area, which could be an additional $4,500 per year. Request for Service to Hollins Manor The County has received two requests to consider extending Valley Metro service to the Hollins Manor Home for Adults in the North County area. Valley Metro has suggested two alternate routes for this. The first would go from Crossroads Mall, along Williamson Road to Hollins Manor and Hollins College and then return to the City along the same route. The second would travel along Williamson Road to Hollins Manor, on to Hollins College, and return along Plantation Road and Hershberger Road to the Crossroads Mall area. The estimated cost of the subsidy to provide either of these routes would be $28,775 annually (less 50% of the revenue from the route) for full service or $48,851 annually for an abbreviated service which would provide trips during the morning and early evening hours. Either of these two proposals would require an additional subsidy of approximately $4,700 per year to 2 ~'~_.;.. cover the cost of the STAR service to the expanded area. ANALYSIS: The County has contracted with the Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. (RADAR) to provide CORTRAN services to residents of Roanoke County. CORTRAN services include curb-to- curb transportation to any qualified County resident to and from points inside Roanoke County (including destinations inside Roanoke, Salem and Vinton). It does not, however, offer this service to the residents of the City of Roanoke. Basically, their needs are met through the STAR service provided by Valley Metro. To qualify for CORTRAN service, the resident must be sixty or older with an identification card from the League of Older Americans or be physically challenged and have an identification card indicating that they have met the qualifications from the Easter Seal Society. CORTRAN uses wheelchair-equipped vans to assist in this service. The STAR service (Specialized Transit-Arranged Rides) provides similar transportation facilities for persons living within three- quarters of one mile of an existing Valley Metro route. This basically includes the residents of the City of Roanoke and persons that live within three-quarters of a mile of a route that extends into an adjacent locality. Staff feels that because the Brambleton Corporate Center is located within three-quarters of a mile of the existing terminus of a Valley Metro route, that the needs of City residents to utilize this facility may be met through the STAR Service. County residents can be accommodated through the use of CORTRAN service without requiring an extension of Valley Metro along a new corridor. Eligible residents of Hollins Manor, as County residents, would likewise have the benefit of CORTRAN service to provide for their transportation needs. CORTRAN has suggested that its facilities are nearing capacity and that any appreciable increase in service desired by County residents could require the addition of one van plus associated operating cost. An estimated budget of $20,000 was suggested including $6,000 for the lease of a van and $14,000 for operating expenses. Considering this alternative, the County may wish to expand the scope of persons eligible to utilize CORTRAN services to include persons challenged by mental disabilities in addition to those challenged by physical disabilities. This type of improvement could be beneficial to all residents of Roanoke County instead of to limited transportation service areas such as along Williamson Road, Brambleton Avenue, etc. 3 . ,, '~~ FISCAL IMPACT AND ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not alter the existing service levels now and consider any alternatives as a part of the normal budget process for the fiscal year to begin July 1, 1993. 2. Expand the CORTRAN service to provide one additional van plus operating expenses ($20,000) and include persons challenged with mental disabilities meeting certain eligibility criteria. This benefit could be to residents County-wide. 3. Extend Valley Metro service along Brambleton Avenue to the Brambleton Corporate Center at an approximate annual cost of $9,000 per year for basic services plus STAR service. 4. Extend Valley Metro service to Hollins Manor using the limited service program (mornings and early evening service) at an annual cost of $19,541 which includes basic service plus STAR service. 5. Extend Valley Metro to Hollins Manor using full service at an annual cost of $33,475 including basic service and STAR service. 6. Extend Valley Metro service to both the Brambleton Corporate Center and Hollins Manor using the full service criteria at an annual cost of $42,475. 7. Make no changes now and suggest that the businesses (Brambleton Corporate Center and Hollins Manor) contract individually with Valley Metro or other appropriate transportation services to provide mass transit facilities or to consider vans or other transportation services from their own facility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends Alternative #1 (no alterations to services at this time) and that the alternatives be considered as part of the normal budget process for the 1993-94 fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ohn M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 4 . ~ t Lam- ACTION VOTE Approved (~) Motion by: u_ Od_11 Minnix No Yes Abs Denied ( ) mc~t i nn to a~prov ~ of f Eddy x Received ( ) rP~nmmanc9at~c~n (~ d f r any Johnson x Referred ( ) r3 PC-i si ~n to the 1_993-94 budget Kohinke x To ( ) -~ rneP~~ , Alt #1 Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John C. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~ ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for October 27. 1992. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to rezone 3.09 acres from R-5 to R-1 to construct single family homes, located at the intersection of Buck Mountain and Starkey roads, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Palm. Hermitage Corporation. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for October 27, 1992. ~-/- (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item 1 , inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Action Approved ( ) Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ~vw~ `~'~ - `~- Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name• Palm Hermitage Corporation Address: P. 0. Box 8614 Roanoke, VA 24014 Date Rec .: `o'~ Y~ Received By:~, Case No.: Ord. No.: ~1 /~~~ ~/ ~~~ (5`s~} i ~~ Phone: 772-9246 2. Applicant's Name: Same as #1 Phone: Address: 3. Location of Property: Corner Buck Mountain Road, Starkey Road, an Bran erwoo Drive Tax Map Number(s) : 97.02-01-10 ~~D M~~ q"7' ~~ ~ ~ ^ ~~ 4. Magisterial District: 5. Size of Property: 3.09 acres 6. Existing Zoning: R-5 Existing Land Use: Vacant 7. Proposed Zoning: R-1 Proposed Land Use: Lots for single family homes 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No X (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: $1,500,000 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application / Concept.Plan Metes and Bounds Description ~- List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) / Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property owner, Contract Purchaser, Or owner' ~e Date ~ ~' 2 Signature ~ ~-/ August 17, 1992 Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Letter of Application for Rezoning of Tax #97.02-01-10 Dear Sir or Madam: Please let this letter stand as our "Letter of Application" that is required for the rezoning of Tax #97.02-01-10. We are requesting that this property be rezoned from R-5 to R-1. By rezoning this property we would be able to build twelve (12) single family homes on the property as opposed to thirty (30) townhomes for which it is currently zoned. It is our belief that by down-zoning this property to single family homes, the general geographic area and the Branderwood neighborhood would be better served. The construction of these single family homes will be, in our opinion, more compatible with the neighborhood. Sincerely, PALM J1~R~'~GE CORPORATION ,Fe .., August 17, 1992 Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Tax No. 97.02-O1-10 Dear Sir or Madam: I have attached a check for $495.00 for the rezoning of the referenced Tax No. 97.02-01-10 from R-5 to R-1. At this time we will not make application for water and sewer. Such fees would be paid at the time our subdivision plan of development is approved. I have also attached a Meets and Bounds description as well as a proposed layout showing the lots that would be developed and a list of the adjacent property owners. Sincerely, PALM HERMITAGE CORPORATION r~ ~\ \~ \ \~ \o\ \ \ I ~ 'S / / % ~/ -_ ~ ~~ v ` } ~2 ~Z o • ~~~ Z~ ~, ~r~ ' Z 2~ -; ~ .~ ~ ~ oy ~~ ~ ~.~ ~ i RW~~~ ~~~pE /-f • a Q ~ ~9 ~ ti v ~,~•. h M V V D O ~~ Q J U~ ~ 2 V 1! V 1\ 1 11 - _• - I ~ ~ lil6 37 \ , r ,"j~ /z'.xr' z< ''~"'. _ ."~ ~ v 38 / ` ~ ~[\., , f°ocsr to°..r ~;/ _ xi xo ~• • •/ 26 xro '• `...~ e ` ___ 43 42 •Q\ u ~ 41 N.'l R3 Buct Run - `wl 28 ,.. _. _ v ~ asst 42 q3 _ ~T Cfurr .~.3 _ Iarn ~ alt ` cva I .s°r irT' Q' R.. 679 Buck /JOUnr4in Road o ~ ~ aaa ~~ ~Rf. 679 ~ • °~ ~ -_ o .>..~ - - - - - r- -- C 1 .rrf 'rsal iswn Hit _ 6 7 8 9 p^ MI t! t2 ~ 1 - ~ 5 C ,,,, . .sr, 'o .ya \ ° p'' '=a HO sas 4raa ern wa ° riff 13 !.Otte S . „ MT/pq~ .' n • ~ crrt ~ b ~prrt RI. 1964 'Z .+ S wn rr o .. p • A Iq BI Ti's ~ n. Y ~ NSI IrY IfM = $ (>' O i 44Ia = 21 ! _ vT 1 $ °'a ~ ' ; 20 19 : IB ' Y .. 16 rut M, fr r s ~ O' ~4n 4ti ~ ' 3 S 79 ° ' a 83 / i •.~ Wry 24 ..• ap „f 7g rfra , ,a.f83 4y~ ~ g , ~ .L.1°ia'' ~ 'O tart ~ °w M „ ~ .' _ ~ 7 } Ollyr t 'V 2.0f Ac b N IMI ' r.fl { rsJ t r..r7 it!! a ~ ~{ b 9 4rn 3 e ISIl 42 ~{~ .• f(Oi r ~ ~o, •J• ° irii ,i M 3 e, ~. r a° ~ • _ ° i d i ppM r: i12! l° 9 „ M 41 rrst '•~ itp ~`N~.s tb : 3 O 1 ~ • urr $ f °um . ;. rfv a s . 2 '7 ~ r~ afa rrr ,„ ro rlOl 17 LDr K uf.. ~_.~ s +W \ : ! of • i•i 4 j 10 ° 43 ~ .v ° r 28a 3 afw 4a ~•. fj~ a ~ ~ f .` S ' 4lrf r / Tarr roi 19 4f+i • ^, piri.• 27 y „ 11 ~ ~ r ~ «a. : 29 .ac 4c KI I~ , ~' '~ `is f O 3 f "alts : ~ ~ .as. a 3 + ,.. ~ Y..q« • _. 74 d ~ ~9`a ~4 ` 26 ,n i ' nr.a• 4 s„g~ o ~ 30 ' ~ ~ r h by dtt .• ~+ a{ ~'4.oa ' 47 r..r ~ !ap'fY• e ..pr >. s O d; 7Z M,~t da ,{Q ' rr °•I ' r+a {n r 3wq • rr~ r _ 71 * ~ 2.4 ,, , ~ ••~y ~:• ~ x'46 „ '- ...;' AT'T' OTHER PARCELS ,~ „ . , 1, ~ p ,,,. - v. ARE ZONED RE }Qt pOAr+ 41 _ `- ~A ROANOKE COUNTY PALM HERMITAGE~CORPORATION ~. d,~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 97.07-2-80 rue R-5C TO R-1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ~~IN~ DATE: September 22, 1992 ~ENDA ITEM: Ordinance to Authorize the County Treasurer to Accept Payment of Local Taxes and Other Fees and Charges by Use of a Credit Card. ' S COMMRNTS : ~,~-y,,~-„--~l~a ~A-f'( ~~ BACKGROUND: Section 58.1-3013 of the Code of Virginia enables a local governing body by ordinance to authorize the Treasurer to accept payment of local taxes, other fees, and charges through the use of a credit card. As County Treasurer, I would like to implement this practice in Roanoke County. SUI~II~ARY OF INFORMA~ON: As part of an ongoing effort to improve customer service, I propose that we implement the use of credit cards for the following reasons: 1. It provides the taxpayer with an alternate method of paying. 2. It gives constituents an additional cash management tool. 3. The County will benefit from the good will received as a result of providing an expanded service. Those citizens choosing to use the service will pay the service fee charged by the provider which is not to exceed 4$ of the bill being paid. In addition, the County cannot charge the citizen a fee which is higher than that charged by the provider. $380 annually for the rental of equipment and telephone line. Funds for this expense are included in the Treasurer's budget. STAFF ~COMMENnATInN: See attached proposed ordinance. ~/ i ~ i `~% ~ j Alfred C. Anderson, CFO, CGT Elmer C. Hodge Treasurer, Roanoke County County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING ARTICLE I "IN GENERAL" OF CHAPTER 21 "TAXATION" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 21-9 "USE OF CREDIT CARD IN PAYMENT OF TAXES" WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3013 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, enables a local governing body by ordinance to authorize the treasurer to accept payment of local taxes, other fees and charges generated by the sale of utility services by use of a credit card, and, WHEREAS, the Treasurer of Roanoke County has recommended to this Board of Supervisors that such ordinance be adopted in order to improve customer service and assist in the collection of taxes, other fees and charges, and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1992. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1) That a new section numbered 21-9 and entitled "Use of credit card in payment of taxes, other fees or charges" be and hereby enacted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 21-9. Use of credit card in payment of taxes, other fees or charges. The treasurer is authorized to accept payments of local taxes, other fees or charges generated by the sale of utility services by use of a credit card. In addition to any penalties and interest, 1 the treasurer shall add to such payment a sum not to exceed four (4) per centum of the amount of the tax, penalty and interest paid, as a service charge for the acceptance of such card. Such service charge shall not exceed the amount charged to the county. 2) This ordinance shall be in effect from and after October 13, 1992. c:\wp51\agenda\code\ctedit.crd 2 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 7-61 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF A PORTION OF VOLUME II "BUILDING MAINTENANCE CODE" OF THE UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE, AND TO ADOPT SUCH PROVISIONS TO REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OR REPAIR OF UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WHEREAS, Section 15.1-11.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the Board of Supervisors to provide by ordinance for the removal or repair of any building or structure which might endanger the public health or safety, for agents and employees of the County to remove or repair such buildings or structures after reasonable notice, for the recovery of the County's costs and expenses of repair or removal, and for the assessment of a lien for unpaid charges; and, WHEREAS, Volume II, "Building Maintenance Code", of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, provides that any local government may enforce the Building Maintenance Code, or any portion of the code; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 6 of Title 36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes local governing bodies to adopt and enforce this Uniform Statewide Building Code, and that this authorization will not prevent the adoption of other local ordinances in accordance with Title 15.1 of the State Code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby determines that it is in the public interest to adopt a portion of the Building Maintenance Code to address the problem of unsafe buildings, which shall be declared to be a public nuisance 1 a and unfit for human habitation and shall be made safe through compliance with this portion of the code and shall be vacated, and either secured against public entry or taken down and removed as directed by the building commissioner; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1992. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That Section 7-61 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: T-ke-p. ^r-.-,-o=T i e~rs~€~~s a~~e~-ems ~-sir-ate-t~~e--w~rr^~~~~l~~ee~~e~~e-erg i-n ~ .. TT.. ; ~..,,.,., ~ ~ .. ~ ^.., ~ a ^ ~~l~in ear-cvir~tir-~t~'~^cQ-sr,,..~~-s~~e~3i3g ei ^}•,.,,••~-,,,•••• be=~-=~~€^~~lra3~-b e~ ~~-e e~--~e~~e~~e~o~i-ems ez~~~ Sec. 7-61. Adoption. There is hereby adopted by the board of supervisors, insofar as not inconsistent with the laws of the State this Code and the ordinances of the County, for the purpose of establishing rules and regulations for the protection of the public health or safety as a result of an unsafe building or structure, a portion of that certain code known as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. Volume II, Building Maintenance Code, Section 105.0 "Unsafe Buildings", as the same may, from time to time, be amended. This 2 portion of said code is hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein and the provisions thereof shall be controlling in the inspection enforcement repair removal and securing of buildings or any other structures within the County and within the Town of Vinton. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ./~ • ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~^" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Reading of Ordinance to amend and reenact Section 7-61, Roanoke County Code and Adopt Section 105 Unsafe Buildings, Volume II, Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~s-~cc~rwr~~~--''( ~~~0 `~`'~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance to adopt Section 105, Volume II entitled Building Maintenance Code. Adoption of this section would give Roanoke County the authority to condemn buildings and structures regardless of which code was in effect at the time the structure was built. BACKGROUND At the present time, Roanoke County does not have the authority to condemn unsafe buildings and structures built after September 1, 1973. The reason is that in 1987, the Code of Virginia directed the Board of Housing and Community Development to adopt a Uniform Statewide Building Code to provide uniform regulations for construction, maintenance, and use of buildings and structures. To satisfy this mandate, the Board of Housing and Community Development developed two volumes of the Uniform Statewide Building Code; Volume I regulates new construction, and Volume II regulates the maintenance of existing buildings and structures. The Code of Virginia mandates local governments to enforce Volume I. Enforcement of Volume II by local governments is optional. ~'°-_ ~ The authority of the Building Commissioner to condemn unsafe buildings or structures was established in Volume II. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION In order for Roanoke County to address this issue, County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt Section 105 of Volume II of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. The first reading of the proposed September 8, 1992; Public Hearings and scheduled for September 22, 1992. FISCAL IMPACTS ordinance was held on the second reading is There may be some situations whereby the County will have to contract to have a building demolished or secured against entry. The contractor will have to be paid up front and a lien filed against the property. However, a lien filed against the property does not guarantee total compensation to the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance. Staff does not recommend adoption of the complete edition of Volume II of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, due to inadequate staff to enforce additional regulations. ED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~ ~/ _9 C..~ Arnold Covey, Direc Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe ions County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association Brad Corcoran, Vinton Town Manager VOTE No Yes Abs 2 ,T - I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 7-61 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF A PORTION OF VOLUME II "BUILDING MAINTENANCE CODE" OF THE UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE, AND TO ADOPT SUCH PROVISIONS TO REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OR REPAIR OF UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WHEREAS, Section 15.1-11.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the Board of Supervisors to provide by ordinance for the removal or repair of any building or structure which might endanger the public health or safety, for agents and employees of the County to remove or repair such buildings or structures after reasonable notice, for the recovery of the County's costs and expenses of repair or removal, and for .the assessment of a lien for unpaid charges; and, WHEREAS, Volume II, "Building Maintenance Code", of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, provides that any local government may enforce the Building Maintenance Code, or any portion of the code; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 6 of Title 36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes local governing bodies to adopt and enforce this Uniform Statewide Building Code, and that this authorization will not prevent the adoption of other local ordinances in accordance with Title 15.1 of the State Code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby determines that it is in the public interest to adopt a portion of the Building Maintenance Code to address the problem of 1 unsafe buildings, which shall be declared to be a public nuisance and unfit for human habitation and shall be made safe through compliance with this portion of the code and shall be vacated, and either secured against public entry or taken down and removed as directed by the building commissioner; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1992. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That Section 7-61 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: 8 3' o eccare--r~~-~-tira~-~upTccc-~e--crr t, , a ~. ~ .. "' °vcr-r~r'aa-i-rrg~6a~e-ii~esa-cv=rsciiccce'a TF ., .,ti.~ ' i a; ,•},•• ,•},arc r l ~ eG 6~t c ~e ~- r~.~~? 'crr'r ti,~e-3zm~"jze~--~6 ~}a, r ". ,• i can g E3 f ••i., Sec. 7-61. Adoption. There is hereby adopted by the board of supervisors, insofar as not inconsistent with the laws of the State,_this Code and the ordinances of the County for the purpose of establishing rules and regulations for the protection of the public health or safety as a result of an unsafe building or structure a portion of that certain code known as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Volume II Building Maintenance Code, Section 105.0 "Unsafe 2 ~` Buildings" as the same may, from time to time be amended. This ,portion of said code is hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein and the provisions thereof shall be controlling in the inspection enforcement repair. removal and securing of buildings or any other structures within the County and within the Town of Vinton. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after October 1, 1992. c:\wp57\agenda\rode\unsafe.bld 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~d~ ~"~ r. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCES AMENDING AND REENACTING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO REFLECT RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES BY THE GENERAfL ASSEMBLY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~,.~,,.i.,,,~.,~/ o~~'~'`~'`"~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• The proposed changes to various chapters and sections of the Roanoke County Code reflect a variety of noncontroversial house- keeping amendments which are either mandated or authorized by recent amendments to the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended by the General Assembly in the last two years. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The substance of the changes to the Roanoke County Code, in numerical sequence, are as follows: 1. Secs. 3-5, 3-8, 3-10 and 3-12 of the Roanoke County Smoking Policy to conform with state law regarding issuance of summons for violations, posting of certain signs, and clarification of definitions and exemptions. 2. Secs. 4-86, 4-90, 4-95, 4-96, 4-97, 4-100, 4-101, 4-101, 4- 113 and 4-117 of Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, AMUSEMENTS of the Code to conform to recent changes in the Code of Virginia with which our County Code may not conflict. 3. Sec. 7-68 of Chapter 7 BUILDING REGULATIONS to give liens for repairs or demolition of unsafe buildings the same legal effect as liens for unpaid local taxes. 4. Sec. 9-18 of the "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code" of Chapter 9 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION to authorize the Fire Marshall or his assistants to enter private property to investigate spills or releases of hazardous material or waste. 5. Secs. 10-4, 10-36 and 10-58 of Chapter 10 LICENSES to restrict issuance of business licenses where any applicant has delinquent business license, business personal property, meals, transient occupancy and admissions taxes outstanding, to amend the definition of business or personal services and ..,~ ~ Q to codify the requirements for "Going out of Business Sales" contained in state law. 6. Sec. 12-26 of Article II. County Vehicle License of Chapter 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC to clarify the situs of motor vehicles owned by college students as the student's domicile for purposes of county vehicle decals. 7. Sec. 12-54 of Article III. Parkins of Chapter 12 to incor- porate a requirement of the Virginia Statewide Building Code effective January 1, 1993, requiring that all signs for handicapped parking spaces be above grade. 8. Sec. 12-102 of Article IV. Accidents Chapter 12 authorizing county police officers to remove vehicles involved in an accident which are impeding the orderly flow of traffic. 9. Sec. 16.1-25 of Chapter 16.1 PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS to authorize law enforcement officers to take possession of articles known or believed to be stolen or missing. 10. Secs. 17-2, 17-14, 17-15, 17-75 and 17-86 of Chapter 17 PROCUREMENT CODE to expand the definition of professional services, increase the amount by which fixed-price contracts may be modified, raise the minimum amount of construction contracts for which performance and payment bonds are required, amend the conditions for negotiating with qualified offerors of professional services and raise the ceiling for the county's small purchase procedure including microcom- puters. FISCAL IMPACTS' Unknown ALTERNATIVES' 1. Adopt the proposed code changes to bring the county into agreement with current provisions of the Code of Virginia. 2. Decline to adopt the proposed changes and risk county actions and enforcement efforts being ruled as illegal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Roanoke County Code. 2 ~'aa. ~ Respectfully submitted, Jo ph B O enshain Se 'or A sistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 3 S- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.a AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 3-5. SMOKING PROHIBITED., SEC. 3-8. EREMPTIONB., SEC 3-10. POSTING REQUIREMENTS. AND SEC. 3-12. ENFORCEMENT. OF ARTICLE II, ROANORE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY OF CHAPTER 3, AIR POLLUTION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE REGARDING EXCEPTIONS TO AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA INDOOR CLEAN AIR ACT. WHEREAS, the "Roanoke County Smoking Policy" was adopted in 1990 to make effective within the County of Roanoke the provisions of the "Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act," Chapter 8.1 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, the 1991 and 1992 sessions of the General Assembly of Virginia have adopted certain amendments to the "Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act" which require corresponding amendments to the "Roanoke County Smoking Policy;" and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 3-5. "Smoking prohibited," SEC. 3-8. Exemptions," Sec. 3-10. "Posting requirements" and Sec. 3-12. "Enforcement" of Article II, "Roanoke County Smoking Policy" of Chapter 3, "AIR POLLUTION" be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 3-5. Smoking Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke in any of the following places: s of ca acit e~'~<«~`~`3~<`o 1. Elevators, regardles P Y, :::>.;;>~,::<:;:;::;:<::<;;;;:::;:;;::::.::::.::.:::::::.:::,,,: r .... ~' .i:::::4A;KP~r. Sec. 3-8. Exemptions. A. Provisions of this Article shall not be construed to regulate smoking in the following areas: `;` ~ "~~~ >~ ` oi?. . <> .~. ores:: ~«:::::>::t~?~a~r~:>:»waehv~t~:~~t~?~.;:.;:..~ :::::::::::::::::::::.:.~ 2 . Reta i 1 tobacco st ;:f;:>::>:::;:::::.;:.;:.:;;:;:.;:.;:>;:;;:.;:.:;;:::.;:.;:_:;;;;.:::.;;;;.~:::.;;::::::.:: :::::.::::.:::::::::.:::~.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::: :3T{.F!1'R.A 4f~~~.,~f~.,',!ie!:J::;~;:J~i:..~~. ,',::::„~r,,~.'~~i,R,~:',.~,',.~'; ~::4~:.~.`..'w~.. / Sec. 3-10. Posting Requirements. Any person who owns, manages, or otherwise controls any building or area in which smoking is regulated by this Article si ns ~ri;~ ;~xi~u~:::>:>:~<:::>::::> ::ukx1~:C<::>:<~tet~ stating Smoking shall post g ......:::::»»~»»>::>::>::>::>::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.>:.;;~;:;::;:.:::.;::.;:::; ::::::::::.:::.::::.;::;. Permitted" or "No Smokinq," and in restaurants, signs conspicuous to ordinary public view at or near each public entrance stating "No-Smokinq Section Available." Sec. 3-12. Enforcement. The provisions of this Article shall be enforced by any October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~'Lzz~ !~ Q~GC~~ Mary H.~Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Famil~Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF ,THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.b AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 4-86. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 4-90. PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT, OPERATION OR CONDUCT GENERALLY., SEC. 4-95. LIMITATION ON VALUE OF PRIZES., SEC 4-96. FINANCIAL RECORDS AND REPORTS GENERALLY., SEC. 4-97. CERTIFICATE TO ACCOMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT., SEC 4-100. LIMITATION ON FREQUENCY OF BINGO GAMES., SEC 4-101. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF GROSS RECEIPTS FROM BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES., SEC 4-113. QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANT., AND SEC. 4-117. VALID ONLY IN COUNTY AND AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS; EXCEPTION. OF ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended authorizes the governing body of any county to adopt an ordinance for the purpose of regulating any bingo game or raffle within such county as long as not in conflict with the provisions of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the 1992 Session of the General Assembly has adopted amendments to the above mentioned Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, which necessitate corresponding amendments to the Roanoke County Code to remove any conflict between the County Code and the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article V. BincLo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 4-86. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: Raffle means a lottery in which the prize is won by a random generally. ... ; ;.:::.:: ;::>::>::b; .; ,..:.;:.:::::.. ::::::. ~rscan.s:::::.~.~m ;1.~ :erg:::::::a~::::.;:.;~ :.:::::::::.:::::::::::::.;::.;:.;;;:.;:.;;:.:::::::::::.:~:::::::::::.;:.;;;;:.;::::::::::::: ~~~~~ :~::.;;;:.;;~Q~::::;:.;:.P.::::::.:;.>::.;:.;:.;;:;.;:.;;;:.;;:.>:.;;:.;:.;:~.::::.>;~:.;;;:.;:.;:.;:.;;;;:.;:.;:.;;: :.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....................................... .> . ..:.:.. .::.:.., ;;;;~?f:.>:.::cr;;:.;:.fc~~:.;::.deaf:.;;:;cap-:.;:.;b~.~.~::::::::P :::::::::::::::::.;:.;:.;{.:::::::.::::::::~::::. a bona fide member of an organization holding a permit under this Article who has been a member of such organization for at least ninety (90) days prior to such 2 3 calendar day exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). 4 acknowledged in the presence of an authorized notary public. (d) The failure to file the reports required by this section when due shall cause the automatic revocation for the permit issued under this Article and the organization involved shall not conduct any bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained. (e) The reports and other items required to be filed under this section shall be a matter of public record. Sec. 4-97. Certificate to accompany financial report. ~~~ The financial report required by section 4-96 shall be accompanied by a certificate, verified under oath, by the board of directors of the organization that the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have been used for those lawful, religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is 5 those lawful, religious, charitable, community or education purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized; and (iii) the gross receipts have been used in all respects in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Sec 4-100. Limitation on frequency of bingo games. (a) No organization may hold bingo games more frequently than two (2) calendar days in any one calendar week, except that a special permit may be granted an organization which entitles such organization to conduct more frequent operations, during carnivals, fairs and other similar events, at its principal meeting place or any other site selected by such organization which is located in the county and does not violate any other ordinance of the county. The sponsoring organization shall accept only cash`<`a'~~?` cy~~~~~1`~G~ in payment of any charges or assessments for p ayers to participate in bingo games. (b) No building or other premises shall be utilized, in whole or in part, for the purpose of conducting bingo games more frequently than two (2) calendar days in any one calendar week; 6 provided however, that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the playing of bingo pursuant to a special permit issued in accordance with subsection (a) above. No building or other premises owned by an organization as defined in section 4-86 which is qualified as a tax exempt organization pursuant to Section 501 (c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code shall be utilized in whole or in part for the purpose of conducting bingo games more frequently than four (4) calendar days in any one calendar #e ~ea~. One building or premises owned by the county shall also be exempt from the provisions of this subsection. Sec. 4-101. Restrictions on use of Gross Receipts from Bingo Games or Raffles. 7 Sec. 4-113. Qualifications of applicant. Prior to the issuance of a permit under this division, the applicant organization must meet the following requirements: (1) Except for recently established volunteer fire and rescue operations exceed, or can be expected to exceed, seventy- five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to section 501 ~~#' --E of the United States Internal Revenue 8 h ~:::>::::vxh:~~he~~<:a:~:>::e~:r:::: ~ r>~> .. :.:...:::::::. :::. ..: .....: ::: :::: na,:e::::>=a:n::::;:::~~d~~::~:dual:;::::~h.:.::;.:::::::::::::::::::: ::......................................... ...:>::>::>::»::>::>::;::>::;>::>::>::»>:<:::>:: er:l::.:< ;::>::: u.a. ~~. . .::::..es :can:s:~:b~..~:::::::.FQ.r.:.:.;:.;:.::.~.a>:~..a.n. ;:.:>::>:<~.h~:.:;:.;:.;a .::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::.~::::q:.:::::::::.::::.;:.;;;::.;:: ~> sec. 4-117. Valid only in county and at designated locations; exception. A permit issued under this division shall be valid only in this county and only in such locations as are designated in the permit application~i However, t an organization which has obtained a permit to conduct a raffle may sell such raffle ~~ ~i :::::::::::::::~::::::::.;:.;:.;:.;::.; 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `1'Y'1 ~'~,` ~ . ~.... Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 10 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.C AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 7-68, REPAIR OR DEMOLITION BY COUNTY OF ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING LIENS AGAINST REAL ESTATE FOR COST OF REPAIR OR DEMOLITION WHEREAS, Sec. 7-68, "Repair or demolition by county." provides for a lien against the real estate for the cost of any repair or demolition work performed by the county pursuant to Article IV of Chapter 7 of the County Code; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended § 15.1-11.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to provide that liens for repairs or demolition to property performed by a locality shall have the same dignity as liens for unpaid taxes and shall be enforceable in the same manner; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 7-68. "Repair or demolition by county" of Article IV. "UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES" of Chapter 7 "BUILDING REGULATIONS" of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 7-68. Repair or demolition by county. If a notice given pursuant to section 7-66 is not complied with, the county may proceed to repair or demolish the unsafe building or structure, and the cost to the county of such work shall be and constitute a lien against the real estate upon which >::>ski:~:~:~:>:::~~:n:;:<~?~:::>::~:::>:pad,~.:<::<:;;;:.<:::>::»>::»:::;:::::;.::::.;.:. such work is performed. ~;~~7-~n::>::»>::>::»>::»»::>::»>::;:.;:.;:.;:.;;::.;;;:;.;:.;:.;:.; ::.::::::::.:::::::::::::............ .::.:::........ :..: .;;:.;::..::: ::.: .::::.::::.: .: .:::::.:;.;:. ~s~::.;::~:.~:c~.f...::.;:.~~a, ~~:~;:.;::.:::::::.;:.;;::.;;;;:.;:.;::;.::::::.;:.;;:.::.;:.;;:.;;;;:.:::::;:::::::: 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `"l"37G~~ ~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22,1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.d AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 9-18. ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE FIRE MARSHAL TO ENTER PROPERTY TO INVESTIGATE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WHEREAS, Sec. 9-18 of the Roanoke County Code authorizes the Roanoke County Fire Marshal and his assistants to enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and Article II of Chapter 9 of the County Code; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently enacted § 27-37.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to expand the authority of localities to empower Fire Marshals to enter upon private property to investigate a release of hazardous materials or waste to determine the cause of any such release and the extent of any effect upon ground or surface water or soils and to obtain a summons when such entry is denied; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 9-18. "Enforcement" of Article II. "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE" of Chapter 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION'S be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 9-18. Enforcement. ~`~~' The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this code. The county fire marshal shall establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for the administration and enforcement of said code. The county fire marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation of the provisions of the code, pursuant to the provisions of Section F-106.8 of said Code. The fire marshal shall coordinate his enforcement activities with the county building official and zoning administrator. The fire marshal shall assign and detail such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in administering and enforcing the provisions of such code. 2 2. That is ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Y~ a~e•c f~ .mod . Q.u..c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Ave, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.e AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 10-4, APPLICATION FOR LICENSE; DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER; PENALTIES FOR OPERATING BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE. FAILING TO FILE AN APPLICATION, OR FILING FALSE STATEMENTS., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL TO RESTRICT ISSUANCE OF BUSINESS LICENSES WHERE ANY TAXES DUE THE COUNTY ARE UNPAID AND SEC. 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS AND TO ADD A NEW SEC. 10-58. GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALES, PERMITS, INSPECTIONS, APPLICATION FOR PERMIT, INVENTORY REQUIRED, COMMINGLING OF OTHER GOODS PROHIBITED; DURATION, ADDITIONAL PERMITS, ADVERTISEMENTS, FEE. TO CODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDUCTING SUCH SALES. WHEREAS, Sec 10-4 (e) of the Roanoke County Code currently restricts the issuance of any business license until the tax or fee for such license has been paid to the County; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended § 58.1-3700 to authorize any local governing body to restrict the issuance of any business license until all delinquent business license or personal property tax, and any meal, transient occupancy or admissions taxes properly assessed by and owed to the locality have been paid by the applicant; and WHEREAS, Sec. 10-36 of the Roanoke County Business License Ordinance sets forth the requirements for licensure as a personal or business services and contains a non-exclusive listing of representative business and personal service occupations; and WHEREAS, § 18.2-223 and § 18.2-224 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, establish standards that localities are to enforce for issuing permits for "going out of business" sales and authorization to charge a permit fee; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 10-8 Application for license; Duties of Commissioner; Penalties for operating business without a license, failing to file an application, or filing false statements., of Article I. In General, and Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations. of Article II, Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions of Chapter 10, LICENSES be amended and reenacted and a new Sec. 10-58, Going out of business sales; permits; inspections; application for permit; inventory required; commingling of other goods prohibited; duration; additional ,permits; advertisements; fee. of Article III, Special License Provisions, of Chapter 10, LICENSES be added as follows: Sec. 10-4. Application for license; duties of commissioner; penalties for operating business without a license, failing to file an application, or filing false statements. (e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to the ~}•~ ~~~~~~•~~~~~- and such payment shall ~~~~~~1 ~~~~~~~~~ 2 (b) Those rendering a personal or business service include, but not limited to, the following: .............................. ..:::::. tix~:`~: .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. Trucking companies, intrastate and interstate :c.eat:~;:~:a~:+ed::::>zaQ~:~a~::»veh~.~le carr~ez o .e~a~~:n.:>:::~n:»>th~:::::;omm~s:~w~~:~1 .::::.P..:: ~ :::.::::::::::::: g:.:::::.::::::::::::.::.::::.............................................. ;:;i..:: _:;R::::i::i::i::isisi::i:::;~:::::::::i::i:;;:i::::Y:';.`::X:i: ":::i::"•:::a:%;:':::?::2:iii;::::i::::;:: ~ :::::i::i::i::i::i::i::i::i:::::i::::::: ":::::::;;:;:;:::;::;:::::;::: ~::::.;:iii:::>:;;;::;::::::i;::::::::: :ec~>::>::b:: ;:<:::>:: ;::n::::::::>::>:a ::d»::>:f:~.a~z~i: >:::>~u:gib::::>:axu~ua::>:>r~ :~r~:<:<as:::>:r~:. u~~ .............. ~~::::::~~.:a...:.:~..~:::::... z'~ ....::::.......:.........................................................................................................................:.:..:::..::...y.::::. ...:::::.~ ..::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::.:::::::::::::::::::P::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::::.:::::.:..:.:....:...:............. ...................................... 5~~`>~-~esr~el-dire-ee~~€i-~a~e e€-~b-~= ----- --------= Sec. 10-58, Going out of business sales; permits; inspections; application for permit; inventory required; commingling of other goods prohibited; duration; additional permits; advertisements; 3 fee. s....h....~~-.~~....~~....a.:~~.t~~-~»::::'a:~::::>::~»»~>~::>::::~~:~:;za:; ::»>~c~r~~~:a:sed::>::>~n:~i:>«:cs~r~~u~~~d:>::>::~~ .::::.g .::::.::.::::::::::. .::::::::::::.:::::::::::. ~:.:::::::::::::::::::. ~:. ~::::::::::::::.: ~::::::::::::::. '::;::"::i:Y::i:%::::::i::: ~:::::i::i::i::i::i::i::i:::i:::::::.:>::i::ii:::::i::i::::%:::::%:::i::;;;:ii::'i ;:i `~ii<>~ S:r: :;::ii".'•:^~:~it:::::::::::<%::;::::>::i::i::i::i'::ii::i::;;:;::i;::::%'.;::::i::i::::::.::::::::::::: `::i::i::; ...........................:.....:.........:...:..:...::.::~:~.:.:~:.:::.:~~r:::::: s :e:~.~i..~,.~..:::::: ~~.~..~:.~:::::e~m.~:~s:::::: ~ha.~.:1.::.:: ~:e :~:::::~ :::.::.:::::::::.:::::::::::::FP!..~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::P::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.P...:::.~::::::::::::::::::::::::._:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :........................................:....................................................................:.................................................::.............................................................. . ..... ..::::::::. >:~:oe~:<:::f~: .:#.::::.~.::.: ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::.P.:::. ~ :::::::::::::::::.: ~.: ~::::::::::::.P.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::....:...............................................................P .............................. ~::iiiiiiiYiii'iii'^iiii:~i?i;>.•:' y Sj:';{: vvvL; ;:::::::i::i`':i:::i:>:::i::i::i: ~iiiiiiii%~i::::::::'::iiiiiiiii::i":i::..:::.::':::ii ii ii::':::iiliii iiii:•:•:•i~~::i vi ivv::;•::••::::::::ii:i:::iiiiiii::i::i::i::i::i::i:i::::::i::: ~`i'fi:i::ii}ii: ~'oi;ii+}:ii<A+:: {:' `..::ii:+. ~...~ :~ ~~ :~ . i:iiii i. i. .. . ; ::::::: ' . ..: .:::::. , ........................~~.........................::.:::.::::::::::::::::.Y....::::::~:::::;::~::.::::::::::~::::#.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::.....:::..:.................................................. .::::.P .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~. ~::::::::::: g::::::::.:::::.::::::::. ~:::..:................................... ii::?i iX. iiiii%' }i': F: iiiiiii"^}iiiiiiiii»»:: ••iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiX ii+i::: v}iii~::.iiiiiiiiiii:Ci:ivvivv^iiii:' iiiiiiii}i':iii:: •i' ::::::::::::::::::::::::.}•:::::::.}': •::::. ~:::::::::: ~. ~:::.;:.;.:.:'.::.::.::;.#:.:::.:i:.ii:.:::::::.i:.;::.;i::.:::.::.:;::Y:.iiii:.i:.;;;iii»>;:.;>iii:;;:::: ...:.................................................................................................................................................. :::::.::....:..:....:............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... <~_< ~< .....Y.:::.::.:..: ~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~::::::::.:::.::::::.:::::::::::::::.: ~.::::::::::::::. ::::.::::::::::::.::::::..:..i ::;.i:.ii:.;'.;:.;i:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.i:.::.;:.;:.;:.i:.i:.i:.i:.:;:.;:.;:.;:.i:.; :.;:;i;::.ii:.i::.ii:.ii:.i:.::::. .ii:.»»iii: ~:; ~:';;'.;iii>;:.:;.:.i:.i:.;:.ii".ii:.;:.:.;;:.;::.;:.;i:.ii:.ii:.i:.:.:'::::.iii:.:;:.:::::::.;:;;:::.ii::.i:.ii:.: ~:::.:.;'.i:.::;~:.;:.;:.:.i:.:.;:.;::::.ii:.i:.;:.;:.i.:.;:.:.;:.:.;:.;:.i'.:.;:'.i;;i:.ii:.i:.:.;:';;;;;.i::.i:.:.:.:. ..:. .. ......~: •: :ti•i} ::. . . ..... ...:...:... iiiii. .{...:..... R,i.......:...:. .i}i:,:. :...:... iiii: .: .:' . •v<:i:.....:i. v...'•iii'1.: .~: :' iii:i` .:: ...:...Li::i:: :.......:..::::Y .... i ...:: <..... ;..: : .:..: ..::: ~. ~~:~::>::>~,~m~?~r:>::;>:~~s~.: ~~::::>::::fr~~::::::::<~~a;~::<::::s~:7~:~:>::>:>~x;:::;:::>:~h~:>::::>:4xnz~~a:~s::~:~~..~ ............. .::::g ..:::..:::::::::::::::::::.:.:~::.:~.:~::..~..::_:::::::::::::.::::..~.::::::.:::::::::::.::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::: ~?.i:.is.i:.;i:.;:.;:;.;:.;:i:.;:.;:.i: i;:.;;;:.i:.i:.:i:.;::.i:.;:.;:.i:.i>:.;i:;>ii ........:...:...................................................................................................................................................................... :::................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ . ........................... :* :~ ::~>:<:>::::>::::>~he:::::>::o~m~s»~~c~n~~::>::a:f<::>:th+~:>:>Reenu~:>::steal;l:::>:~ha~........a..... ~ .... .:~:::..:3 .:::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::.:::.::::::.:::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::~.::::::..:::::::::::::::.~.:~ ::.::::::. :::i i:~ii:ii ''::iiii . . ~i::;:::~::>'::::: `:::iiiiiii:::''::i:r:2'<::::::::i:::::::: '::::::: ':::: `~:::~':i~::;<:::::;:::;i:::>• :>:..:::•:::::::' ';i::::':::::::i::i::i:>':.:i::i::;::i:::::::::::::;:::::::;'{.i::i`':;::i::;i::::::::::•i:;~ °:: ':'EIt~ J:I'~i.: z:::E:::r~T3:: i >~~:.::»:f~~~::><:<:~lc~~?~~~:::»:::>:::: ~5::t~::::>:::>::fcr~>:>:>~:>each:><::<:::erm~:t:<~:>:::>::~c~..... ...... 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5 ce: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.f AMENDING AND REENACTING BEC. 12-26, REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS, OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING THE SITUS OF MOTOR VEHICLES WHEREAS, Sec. 12-26 of the Roanoke County Code requires that every motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer normally garaged, stored, or parked or acquiring a situs within the county be licensed in the county as a condition to being operated upon the county's streets and roads; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended § 46.2-752 to legally define the domicile of a motor vehicle's owner as its situs in those situations where the owner is a college student; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took place on September 8, 1992; the second reading took place on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke as follows: 1. That Sec. 12-26. Required; exceptions. of Article II. County Vehicle License of Chapter 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 12-26. Required; exceptions. (a) Every motor vehicle, trailer and semitrailer normally garaged, stored, or parked or acquiring a situs within the county and capable of being operated on the streets, highways, roads or other traveled ways in the county shall be licensed in accordance with the provisions of this article and it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate any such vehicle on the streets, highways, roads or other traveled ways in the county, unless such rrent ear . ~~``!>>~~~~`:~ .::.::::::::::.;:::::::::;;.::. vehicle is so licensed for the cu y ............................................................. 1992. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: y~y~a~, J~• ~2-c-~-e-i1-- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor 2 General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.Q AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC 12-54. PARKING PROHIBITED IN SPECIFIED PLACES. OF ARTICLE III, PARKING, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES BY ABOVE GRADE SIGNS. WHEREAS, subsection (f) of Sec. 12-54. Parkinci Prohibited in specified places. prohibits unauthorized parking in spaces reserved for the handicapped both on public streets and highways and on private parking areas open to the public; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recently amended the Virginia Statewide Building Code and §46.2-1237 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to establish requirements for identification of handicapped parking spaces by above grade signs effective by January 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 12-54. Parking Prohibited in specified places. of Article III. PARKING of Chapter 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, of the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 12-54. parking prohibited in specified places. No person shall park or leave standing a motor vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to comply with the directions of a police officer or traffic-control device: (f) Any parking space reserved for the handicapped on a public street, highway, or other public way in the county or in privately owned parking areas open to the public, unless such vehicle displays a special license plate, decal or parking permit issued pursuant to sections 46.2- 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after January 1, 1993. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ,~ ~~~.Gf--2~t,/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 of Ro~°~ ~ YERVSS A~~1WIS~RA ~ per S Cp~11`t`; lgg2 pg TR TgE Rp 4 p M$Eg 22 r '.2 ~S ~O `SS•Rr' AT •j r SE SEC ~ S.~F'13 ARE ~. EE L~ E ~A G CC CK R M gE v S C~S,11 W A WRZ xEZR REGtS gGZW~ ER p11 ~ n EWoL`~V x'1•CZ'ES 'Epg ~ ,~ OTOR T EW ~ VE VE AWE 2 ~ ACO QTY r v C CE qZy~ sCL~,~ gR~ ~g~.iC te,~ ~, anoxe ,iWpt1 pi, VE •it~1 pg T f Chap oz go O~ pvp,L vT$p ~ypW a o tY £ 2,nd 4Eg v ~~S G ~~E "Accidents e5 a'~tn°tl cciaents' as d ST~~GW Azticle Zv • C°de pzovi ~ vehicle a is r 1950 ~ ce ~EgRAS' poke County tigate m°t° e of vl~gln an °~alnan • n e goa inv es e Cod pact v ed i ~~ of th ezs t° °f th s to e inv°l BZCS'~S 0ffic 2,1212 h°die ehicle i 4 in°~ d V °untY Yoe ce gEAS ~ g 6 . al q°vezn ozage of v f fic ~ an geld on C ~~ ozi2es 1°c val and st low of tza dinance was fez 22 r nded r auth the zem° e ozdezlY f of this oz don Se'Ptem art`e for de tY' ding ~ hel pz°viding which iz`pe e fizst zea zeadinq as County ° accidents WKEg~AS~ th the sec°nd s °f the 1992 ~ and f Sv~'ezvisoz lved Se~'te~ez 8 ~ the Boazd o ehicles invo E~Z 1992. CR~AIWED ~Y oil°WS . ~~ e'm°val °f v 12 ~~~CTCg V f R ow 8E ZT a, as 102 CYlaptez f°11 V iz~ini Sec • 12~ tsa of cted as Roanoke ~ at a Y'ew ~~pcciden ode is ena dents TY' le Zv • ntY C ao°1 vo 1• ts~~ of Aztec Roanoke Cou involved in itzailez in acciden .~ of the yebiCles oz sem low of C lez f ~~ ~~FFZ Removal of ehicle ~ tzai e the ozderlY °st to ~ 12~1~2' of°z v o impea at no c t o. a m t mi Se Whenevez o located as ficez may ail ailez oz se t is s i e pf cle ~ tz ede t an acciden CovntY poi ° .m°tor Beni X111 n°t i-mp oza~ oan°xe e the e it a st aY'Y R z em°V tY WY,ez ov ed to ezat°z vicini e zem oz op int in the e the vehicl o av spz`e P ~iil t' oz tzaf fic safekeeping and shall report the removal to the Department of Motor Vehicles and to the owner of the vehicle as promptly as possible. If the vehicle is removed to a storage area under clause (ii), the owner shall pay to the parties entitled thereto all costs incidental to its removal and storage. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~'7Q.il.t~ ,h/ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 2 E Rp~p pZI vYERVSS ABMSRSS~~,~S 80~~ 01CE CpvRTY 1992 ETIZyG OF A2 TgE SOEAEMBER 22 . ACTSNG EEZt EU A REG~ RGI SA R pN S~ESDp,Y , EZtDIEG E~R~ SEB SU ER ~'T TY r V I CEDE Z,1~ R U T F E 4 . •i p ST E CpvN 92292 gpECTIpiCLEB LgB~ pF gOANpR ORDIN~l6 1'25 psl~ pR E gS=' GEM FEZ TEpFF=p E 8E $EC . CX~p2E pF ART 2AL$ ~ EZZFpgCEMRZ1pWZt T RECpgDpRECIpv$ 4ERMZT OF STEMS C°de re~lres Cov~~Y E ~ p~ SESSIpE oan°ke C°nntY cers t° theiz T 2pLEN. 6.1-25 °f the R or°ement o£f 1 rds and at-Y S EgEAS' Sec. 1 admit law enf ne their reco ~ 15 dealers t° ours t° eXami d s recently a pre°1°us met ing bus1T'ess or stole' ~ an of V irglnla ha mended ~ to r premises du ed t° be misslnneral ASSe,.~lY inia ~ 1950 ~ as of any item item belle WHEREAS, the G the C°de of VirgaKe possession cl°us metal of o t re 54.1-4101'1 ent °fficers t remises of a to prevent its amended ~ law enf°rcem tolen on the p evidence or autY'Ori2e be missing or erVe the item as e was held or known t° to Ares ordinanc ber 22 dealer in °rder reading °£ this held on Se'Ptem traY'sfer ~ and Ep,S ~ the first c°nd reading was C°uY DER and the se er~is°rs °f the tuber $ ~ 1992' r of Sup Septe D by the Boa d s re~~ire' 1992 BE ZT oRDAINE f°llows• on of rec°rd ArticlE r inia ~ as ~~ Inspeeti ords • ~~ of c f R°anoke / V i gSec ~ 16.1-25 • d in such rec ms" of the R Ge 0 1• That articles ,liste i°us Metals and ws. hapter and of ter 161 apreanacted as foll° c1 ealers~~ of Chapmended and ree d pY chapter D C°de be a rewire C°untY of =ecosds ction 16.1-25• ~nspe Sec' articles listed in such records. Ever dealer ``'~-~ii:::~:~::s>::::>::em :~:e~:;:<e~ shall admit to his ~~~ during regular business hours,- the chief of police or officers of the police department, the sheriff or his sworn deputies and any law-enforcement official of the state or ~~::es.~::n :::::>::>:~:r::>::::xi:~x~:::>:::car:»:::~re:i::~:~ve~:::>::~; .>::>:::~i:~zn::>::;~v;<:::ha~~:<::::bee~z:::::>:s~to~:en:~:: [State law reference, § 54.1-4101.1 of the Code of Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk 2 Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri KrantzBetty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-8.i AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 17-2. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 17-14. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS., AND SEC. 17-15. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS GENERALLY., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, SEC. 17-75. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES., OF DIVISION 3. COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION, AND SEC. 17-86. DEFINITIONS., OF DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES, OF ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF CHAPTER 17 PROCUREMENT CODE OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT BY WHICH FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS MAY BE INCREASED BY THE PURCHASING AGENT, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS ARE REQUIRED, TO AMEND THE CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION WITH QUALIFIED OFFERORS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND RAISE THE CEILING FOR SMALL PURCHASES AND PURCHASES RELATED TO MICROCOMPUTERS. WHEREAS, Sections 17-2, 17-14, 17-15, 17-75 and 17-86 set forth certain definitions and requirements of the County's Procurement Code in accordance with state enabling legislation; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended § 11-37, § 11-41, § 11-55 and § 11-58 of the Code of Virginia to expand the category of professional services, to raise the ceiling for purchases not requiring competitive sealed bids or competitive negotiation and for purchases of microcomputers and related equipment and services, to expand the authority of the purchasing agent to increase the amount of fixed-price contracts without prior written approval of the governing body and to increase the minimum amount of public construction contracts for which performance and payment bonds are required; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took place on September 8, 1992; and the second reading took place on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 17-2. "Definitions.", Sec. 17-14. "Modification of Contracts.", Sec. 17-15. "Performance and payment bonds generally." of Article I. "In General", Sec. 17-75. "Provisions applicable to procurement of professional services." of Division 3. "Competitive Negotiation", and Sec. 17-86. "Definition." of Division 4. "Small Purchases" of Article II. "Competitive Procurement" of Chapter 17 "PROCUREMENT CODE" of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 17-2. Definitions. Professional services: Work performed by an independent contractor within the scope of the practice of accounting, a~`'z~~::>~~;:<s~~'!~;, architecture, land surveying, landscape architecture, law, medicine, optometry` or professional engineering. 2 advance written approval of the Board of Supervisors. Sec. 17-15. Performance and payment bonds generally. (a) Upon the award of any public construction contract €s~j~; `:t~.+.. >'~t~ exceeding ~?~:;,.;~;~tnr~~'~c:.:;;; :.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;~::::::>:;:::.;;:.;::::.;;:;:.::::::.:;~.;~::.:;:.::.;..~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. t~e~ts~a~e~--e~ez' ~ M~ ' ~' `, ^ ^ ^ ~ ~ i to any prime contractor, such contractor shall furnish to the Board of Supervisors the following bonds: (1) A performance bond in the sum of the contract amount conditioned upon the faithful performance of the contract in strict conformity with the plans, specifications and conditions of the contract. (2) A payment bond in the sum of the contract amount. Such bond shall be for the protection of claimants who have and fulfill contracts to supply labor or materials to the prime contractor to whom the contract was awarded, or to any subcontractors, in the prosecution of the work provided for in such contract, and shall be conditioned upon the prompt payment for all such material furnished or labor supplied or performed in the prosecution of the work. "Labor or materials" shall include public utility services and reasonable rental of equipment, but only for periods when the equipment rented is actually used at the site. Sec. 17-75. Provisions applicable to procurement of professional 3 services. (b) The purchasing agent shall engage in individual discussions with a3~ offers deemed ai fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses and with emphasis on professional competence to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. Such offerors shall be encouraged to elaborate on their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the proposed project, as well as alternative concepts. These discussions may encompass nonbinding estimates of total project cost, including where appropriate, design, construction and life cycle costs. Methods to be utilized in arriving at price for services may also be discussed. Proprietary information from competing offers shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. Sec. 17-86. Definition. 4 1992. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor Dir., Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Dir., Procurement John D. Willey, Dir., Real Estate Assessment Michael J. Lazzuri, Court Services Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Jr., Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Dir., Finance O. Arnold Covey, Dir., Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Dir., Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith, Dir., General Services 5 .r-a~- y:::::::::::: ryiiiiiiii:<9yiii}iiiyi}}}iii: 1. Elevators, regardless of capacity, '~`an~??`c~~xit ....... ..........................::::::::.::::::::::::::::::: nY4ii:'iiiiiii}Yv}ii:: '•i}iiiiti:i...~n:::: "::i%{{;:.. vniiii::i:;:}:iii:i4i:;i:J';{:;:yi "•i ;.:'.:..::. ':?. ':.}:{•i 4iii>}::'yi}iii:<{::.iiii::: '.:i::i::i::..::::::.4.;'::: ::}}iiyyv{:. 'y::v ....: ..: ..:.. v....iii:::: ~::: ~. }. ' .ii: iin :.. ~...: .~} /~y~y.~. {,y ~'y yy .: .: :. '.}}iii:::: '~. ? viiiii: ..i :: :..:. ::: .....vryiii:{ . .... ..:::::.:...: ~i:i.~e~+:::iii~~if;i::;:ii:'t:~!fiii::i:::r!.*.~:::t:i::R}: ~a~:~~>::::>::h4x ~;:;::::;e ~vat~~:,:>:.i:.i;no:::;::> ~~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::..............:.:........ ..,.:::: ~sa~ ; Sec. 3-8. Exemptions. A. Provisions of this Article shall not be construed to regulate smoking in the following areas: ;, i:: :<:::;:>:<:::> :.:;.i::.:::;::.::i:.;::;i:.>:.i:::»:::;.i::ii:.;::>:.iii:.i:: ~~i;:;.>:.:;~;;:.i:;.i:::i:.i::>~::>::>°.:':: >~ ~b~: 2. Retail tobacco stores~>»>ic>`><~:i,:~<~~~hc~'L'~~~t~:::<:>:<~?':::.i:.i:' :.:::::::::::::::::::::: Sec. 3-10. Posting Requirements. Any person who owns, manages, or otherwise controls any building or area in which smoking is regulated by this Article :.;:.i:.<:.:.::;;::<.i:.:;<.>i::i::ii:.:»::>:<>~ :.:>>:::>::>::;:ii:.:;.i:.:: ~;.<.~::;:.::ii:.:»::»;~i;::.i.:::;.i::i:;.i ~~Smokin st si ns ar~~:~~uo~~>;opa~€:~~: stating g shall po g ::::::..:.....P.:...:...:..:........ ... . Permitted~~ or ~~No Smokinq,~~ and in restaurants, signs conspicuous to ordinary public view at or near each public entrance stating 2 -~'- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 4-86. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 4-90. PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT, OPERATION OR CONDUCT GENERALLY , SEC. 4-95. LIMITATION ON VALUE OF PRIZES., SEC 4-96. FINANCIAL RECORDS AND REPORTS GENERALLY., SEC. 4-97. CERTIFICATE TO ACCOMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT., SEC 4-100. LIMITATION ON FREQUENCY OF BINGO GAMES., SEC 4-101. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF GROSS RECEIPTS FROM BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES . , SEC 4-113. QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANT., AND SEC. 4-117. VALID ONLY IN COUNTY AND AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS: EXCEPTION. OF ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended authorizes the governing body of any county to adopt an ordinance for the purpose of regulating any bingo game or raffle within such county as long as not in conflict with the provisions of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the 1992 Session of the General Assembly has adopted amendments to the above mentioned Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, which necessitate corresponding amendments to the Roanoke County Code to remove any conflict between the County Code and the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: c~ I.~ 1. That Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 4-86. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: 2 .T-a6 organization for at least ninety (90) days prior to such participation shall participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle. Except as provided hereir~ no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in the management, operation or conduct of any such game or raffle. 3 ~~ ~~ thousand dollars ($1,000.00), nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any calendar day exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). Sec. 4-96. Financial records and reports generally. (a) Complete records of all receipts and disbursements shall be kept by every organization holding a permit under this Article. Such records shall be filed annually, under oath, with the commissioner of :?;?iiirevenue. All such accounting shall be made on or before the first day of ~ ~]Fe~e~e~ of each calendar year for which a permit has been issued. Such accounting shall include a record of the gross receipts and disbursements of the organization for the year period which commenced on October 1 of • .i}}}}i}ii}i:.:'??iiiiiiiii?iiiiiiiiiiii?iiii}i::.i?i:.i?Jii"'hiiiiii:' ::: ••it•iiiiiii}}}iii+isvviiiiiii}Y}};;n;;.y:'i:"•iiii~4ii:vL•iiiiiiiiiiiii:Li:vvi::ii:..}iiiiiiiii:Ltr: iii'.., the revious ear ~:~:~>: and?:>a::>:r~cc rd:<:~f::ai<::m~x~e:.:::>:::zri::>t~xe:::.:c~:s~s~:x~~>:::o:~; ..................................................................................... P Y ....................................................................................::::::::.1~`.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::.~.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.: i'."::..,: ,;>::»,;:::;>~`>~' «':' ": " `><:::-;:;.;;.,,,,,,::::;_ ::; ;:;;.:::<`:::.;.:;:::><~~;: ~;::,.:,:.:::;. > ;:::::; An or ani z at ion whose ::.::::g::::r~~.e~~ .~f,.ii~h~~.;:;t~ m4ney...~a~.ii;~~~~,a,~~~.~. Y g gross receipts exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) during any calendar quarter shall be required to file an additional accounting of its receipts and disbursements during such quarter, no later than sixty (60) days following the last day of the quarter. (b) The term "gross receipts," as used in this section, shall mean the total amount of money received from bingo and "instant bingo" operations before the deduction of expenses or prizes. (c) All reports of receipts and disbursements required by this ij'i:j~l[;i}}}}}ii:::::::::::: %; ':•iii:::::::::::dt::::'iY•.:p}i:^istitititititi;:'is;iY;:;iiii}}{:y;:;:;:;iiijii:; section shall be made on a form etst~:n?~:<:::::::the:«::::::znf~xr~nat:rsn:::::::a~ 4 ~~~ approved by the Board of Supervisors and duly acknowledged in the presence of an authorized notary public. (d) The failure to file the reports required by this section when due shall cause the automatic revocation for the permit issued under this Article and the organization involved shall not conduct any bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained. (e) The reports and other items required to be filed under this section shall be a matter of public record. Sec. 4-97. Certificate to accompany financial report. ~} The financial report required by section 4-96 shall be accompanied by a certificate, verified under oath, by the board of directors of the organization that the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have been used for those lawful, religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized and that the operation of bingo games or raffles has been in accordance with this article. ~~5~ Any organization having annual gross receipts from bingo :: ";iY;i:iv~i'i ~iiiiii: ~'i:y:Lbiii:;i"}iiiii}i' ~~::iJi:'j':'ry:'}:.}}:j'i}}}}}i{}iWi: "::iii{{i:' :iii .•• :.••::iii:y:titij^i: ames or raffles in excess of ;~~:~:::~d~~:>~ <:'~~:flu~a~'fi~:;:;::~dt~~~:~: g ::...:...:..:.........:.....:::...:..:...:...:.........:...:..:...:...:.....::...:.........:...:..:...........:..:.. as shown on its annual financial report, shall attach to such report an ...::::::. opinion of a licensed ~~l*e~?~c~i certified public accountant that • :';:'iiiii:•iiii:tiiii:viiiiiiiiiiii:".iiiii::...il4iiiiiiiiiiiii}i}:.:4iii:"~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:.:'.iiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiii :iii:v.i'ii:vL.iiii'r:: "!•:!•i:.iiiii" 'iiiii:L: iiiii:.iiiiiiiiiiii:: 'i:"iiiiiiiiiiiii:'.:.iiiiiiiii:A.iiiii" is ~h~:>:any:~a:l>:>:f~nanc~:a;l:>:>re ::ort<»::< res~n~s:~<>~a3rl:.:< ::::>~~x:::>a1:I::»:ter~a ............................................................................ ( ) ::............................................................................:::::::::g:::::::::::::::p.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::y.~.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~sb~se~te~s~s~nel-ee~ee~; (ii) the proceeds of any bingo 5 a6 : ...:. .. Y: ..:..: .......: ;: . ..: ...:::: ..: .. y:::: . :. :..:. Y: ...::: .......: :}ii: .... ~. ~' :: ~:: .:iii.' .:.. v.....i::i. _ . • . :. .. _:. :•:. •:::::::: :: ... :::: ;;:.:::..:.;;:..:: ::>::> u < ~t:<::d::i:::a:~d~;~:>::>:f ee:>i::r~ ::1:r:::::::b:::»::>:e:c:::>::»::~4;~:~:::«: Sec 4-100. Limitation on frequency of bingo games. (a) No organization may hold bingo games more frequently than two (2) calendar days in any one calendar week, except that a special permit may be granted an organization which entitles such organization to conduct more frequent operations, during carnivals, fairs and other similar events, at its principal meeting place or any other site selected by such organization which is located in the county and does not violate any other ordinance of the county. The sponsoring organization shall accept only cash?`~?~~a'?1' in payment of any charges or assessments for players to participate in bingo games. (b) No building or other premises shall be utilized, in whole or in part, for the purpose of conducting bingo games more 6 C~ frequently than two (2) calendar days in any one calendar week; provided however, that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the playing of bingo pursuant to a special permit issued in accordance with subsection (a) above. No building or other premises owned by an organization as defined in section 4-86 which is qualified as a tax exempt organization pursuant to Section 501 (c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code shall be utilized in whole or in part for the purpose of conducting bingo games more frequently than four ( 4 ) calendar days in any one calendar s~I yeas. One building or premises owned by the county shall also be exempt from the provisions of this subsection. Sec. 4-101. Restrictions on use of Gross Receipts from Binqo Games or Raffles. ~> c'.: _>::>:€for:<:»r as. nabl~:>>::a d::>;::r~: er:~:>:~ > ~r~~~n.~:~c~~~s:~.°::>::>~~~l~x~€an: .::: ~:::~I~:.;:.::.: ~ ::::::::::.::.:::~::.::::: .:::::::::::::::.::::::.::::: ~:::::::.P:. ~::::: I~:::::::::.:::::: F::::::::::::::::::::::.:g.:::::::::::::::::::::::.x.:::::::::::::. ~::::::::::::::::::::g 7 ~~ [State law reference - Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § .] Sec. 4-113. qualifications of applicant. Prior to the issuance of a permit under this division, the applicant organization must meet the following requirements: (1) Except for recently established volunteer fire and rescue companies or departments after county approval, such organization shall have been in existence and met on a regular basis in the county for a period of at least two years immediately prior to making application for such ermit. x~:>::no::::case::::>shal::«<:the::>:cr. axt~:~a~ac~x:::>at::1::. ;»>:~~~>:::or ............................................................................... A permit may be issued, however, to an organization which relocates its meeting place, on a permanent basis, from another jurisdiction to the county and which complies with the requirement of this subparagraph, provided such organization was the holder of a valid permit at the time of such relocation. (2) Such organization shall be operated currently and shall have always been in existence as such nonprofit organization for a period of at least two (2) years immediately prior to making application for the permit. (3) Any organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations exceed, or can be expected to exceed, seventy- five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to 8 ~ =.~6 9 :~6 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\bingo.ord 10 '~`' ~ ~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 7-68, REPAIR OR DEMOLITION BY COUNTY OF ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING LIENS AGAINST REAL ESTATE FOR COST OF REPAIR OR DEMOLITION WHEREAS, Sec. 7-68, "Repair or demolition by county." provides for a lien against the real estate for the cost of any repair or demolition work performed by the county pursuant to Article IV of Chapter 7 of the County Code; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended 15.1-11.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to provide that liens for repairs or demolition to property performed by a locality shall have the same dignity as liens for unpaid taxes and shall be enforceable in the same manner; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 7-68. "Repair or demolition by county" of Article IV. "UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES" of Chapter 7 "BUILDING REGULATIONS" of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 7-68. Repair or demolition by county. If a notice given pursuant to section 7-66 is not complied s-ac. with, the county may proceed to repair or demolish the unsafe building or structure, and the cost to the county of such work shall be and constitute a lien against the real estate upon which ~ ::..ryiiiiii".iiiii: ".iiX.iiiiiiiiiiiiiii'+iiiiiY' is"ii:Piiiiyiiiiii:' iiii:hi}iiliiiiiiiiiii; ~::.i}}}}}i}i:~.i:'.i}ii:i4?i}}i:S.i::i:' iiiii:"i:?.iiiiiiiiiiii: such work is erformed. ~~ehr:::>13~n:::sha~::;:::rank?:>:~M:>:~:::: a~:~:..:<::>w~:€tx€:::~>z~~~ P ........................................................................................::.::.:p..;:.;:.::.;:.:;:.;:.;:~>:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;;;:.;;:.;:.;;:.;:.: :::::::::man~er::<:>:as ................... 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\demolit.ord 2 ~"` ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22,1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 9-18. ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE FIRE MARSHAL TO ENTER PROPERTY TO INVESTIGATE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WHEREAS, Sec. 9-18 of the Roanoke County Code authorizes the Roanoke County Fire Marshal and his assistants to enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and Article II of Chapter 9 of the County Code; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently enacted 27-37.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to expand the authority of localities to empower Fire Marshals to enter upon private property to investigate a release of hazardous materials or waste to determine the cause of any such release and the extent of any effect upon ground or surface water or soils and to obtain a summons when such entry is denied; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 9-18. "Enforcement" of Article II. "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE" of Chapter 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION° be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 9-18. Enforcement. -ate (a The Roanoke County Fire Marshal is hereby directed to enforce the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code and this code. The county fire marshal shall establish such procedures or requirements as may be necessary for the administration and enforcement of said code. The county fire marshal is hereby authorized to issue a summons for any violation of the provisions of the code, pursuant to the provisions of Section F-106.8 of said Code. The fire marshal shall coordinate his enforcement activities with the county building official and zoning administrator. The fire marshal shall ,assign and detail such members of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department as inspectors or other assistants as he may deem necessary in administering and enforcing the provisions of such code. i::ii":Sii:+':!?'•i}ii:: •••: iii:•: iiiii:v':.•^}ii:'^:'::ti :tiM:v^ :~~:~::~:~::~>f~.> .;.i:?~~:::<.the.iii i...+..iii::.iiiiiiiiiiii::...iii:": '.:diiiiiiihill.i?iJi:.iiiiii}iii}i :bode.iiiio.fiiii~:.~::..:3n:~:a.: iiiii i" ~i"'r:...}'vn}iiiiii:^ii:::•iii :l~.~;' ;<::as.>i> iiiiiii:4iiiiiiii:"•iiii:: "4iiiiii" iiiii}}}}}})}}i:^iiii?iii}iiiiiiiiiiiiiii:"~ ia~mende~; :.>i;:b~siiii:o~~~:rred: ~i:.iiiiiiiiiiY i}iiiiiiii:viiii:Liii*iiiiiiiiiii:":•Y: ".iiiii o~ «:s:€<:~sas~nabl:::: :::::~? : iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:'.iiiiii: ".iiii:'riiiiiii:: '.iiiiiiiiiiiiii: »::sus:::e~~~c~:;::>~a:::ha~e» ::::::::::::::P:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: L^i:<Jii::vi:i0i::• O:Oii:^ii: "•ii >r~~cur~~d:< ::::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::::: iiiii:^iii' • •?i:v^ii' ::LiI iiii:' iiii})' :ii}}?iii}iiiiiiiiiiii"ryiiii}}}}}}}}::': ::and:~:wh:ach<::ha~::::>~~~~~~d ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: viiiiiii: ".iiiii:vL.iii"•:;{•'<4i:Ji1:::^iii:^iiiiiiii' :ii:.iiiiiiiii"viiiiii%: i:: +iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:: 'viiiiiiii'•iiiiiiii}ii}}:' :}iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iii:"'•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:^i:^iiii:':::ti:v'ti^iii:^:"4:6iiiiiii:viiiii:CiiiV "'v'"LLv: rsrdsx~€:€:€:Q:::~:n:~estz: at¢:»ths:»~*~t~n:>:anr~<:>;:~~~sa:>:~f>:an:: ;:::>s~:>:r~:lsas~::>::~~~:: ~.::.~ :.::::.::::::::::. ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~:::::::::.~,: ~:::::::::::::. ~::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.::::.::::::::::: i~: 2 ~_°~~ October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\fireprev.ord AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 10-4, APPLICATION FOR LICENSE; DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER; PENALTIES FOR OPERATING BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE, FAILING TO FILE AN APPLICATION, OR FILING FALSE STATEMENTS., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL TO RESTRICT ISSUANCE OF BUSINESS LICENSES WHERE ANY TAXES DUE THE COUNTY ARE UNPAID AND SEC. 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS AND TO ADD A NEW SEC. 10-58. GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALES, PERMITS, INSPECTIONS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT, INVENTORY REOUIRED, COMMINGLING OF OTHER GOODS PROHIBITED; DURATION ADDITIONAL PERMITS ADVERTISEMENTS FEE. TO CODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDUCTING SUCH SALES. WHEREAS, Sec 10-4 (e) of the Roanoke County -Code currently restricts the issuance of any business license until the tax or fee for such license has been paid to the County; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended 58.1-3700 to authorize any local governing body to restrict the issuance of any business license until all delinquent business license or personal property tax, and any meal, transient occupancy or admissions taxes properly assessed by and owed to the locality have been paid by the applicant; and WHEREAS, Sec. 10-36 of the Roanoke County Business License Ordinance sets forth the requirements for licensure as a personal or business services and contains a non-exclusive listing of representative business and personal service occupations; and ~~ WHEREAS, 18.2-223 and 18.2-224 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, establish standards that localities are to enforce for issuing permits for "going out of business" sales and authorization to charge a permit fee; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 10-8 Application for license; Duties of Commissioner; Penalties for operating business without a license, failing to file an application, or filing false statements., of Article I. In General, and Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations. of Article II, Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions of Chapter 10, LICENSES be amended and reenacted and a new Sec. 10-58, Going out of business sales; permits; inspections; application for permit; inventory required; commingling of other goods prohibited; duration; additional permits; advertisements; fee. of Article III, Special License Provisions, of Chapter 10, LICENSES be added as follows: Sec. 10-4. Application for license; duties of commissioner; penalties for operating business without a license, failing to file an application, or filing false statements. (e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to 2 ~- ~. (b) Those rendering a personal or business service include, but not limited to, the following: ~...... w'.::.::.::.:: .............................. ............................... Sec. 10-58, Going out of business sales; permits; inspections; application for permit; inventory required; commingling of other 3 ~-~- v ~~ October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\buslicen.ord AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 12-26, REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS, OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING THE SITUS OF MOTOR VEHICLES WHEREAS, Sec. 12-26 of the Roanoke County Code requires that every motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer normally garaged, stored, or parked or acquiring a situs within the county be licensed in the county as a condition to being operated upon the county's streets and roads; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended 46.2-752 to legally define the domicile of a motor vehicle's owner as its situs in those situations where the owner is a college student; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took place on September 8, 1992; the second reading took place on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke as follows: 1. That Sec. 12-26. Required; exceptions. of Article II. County Vehicle License of Chapter 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 12-26. Required; exceptions. (a) Every motor vehicle, trailer and semitrailer normally garaged, stored, or parked or acquiring a situs within the county and capable of being operated on the streets, highways, roads or ~~ other traveled ways in the county shall be licensed in accordance with the provisions of this article and it shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate any such vehicle on the streets, highways, roads or other traveled ways in the county, unless such vehicle is so licensed for the current ear. <?~~~z'~sa~fil7i~''s Y :....:::...:.......:...:........:....:::....:..............:...... 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. c: \wp50\agenda\vehicles.ord 2 ~.7- +~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC 12-54. PARKING PROHIBITED IN SPECIFIED PLACES. OF ARTICLE III, PARKING, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES BY ABOVE GRADE SIGNS. WHEREAS, subsection (f) of Sec. 12-54. Parking Prohibited in specified places. prohibits unauthorized parking in spaces reserved for the handicapped both on public streets and highways and on private parking areas open to the public; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recently amended the Virginia Statewide Building Code and 46.2-1237 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to establish requirements for identification of handicapped parking spaces by above grade signs effective by January 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 12-54. Parkinci Prohibited in specified places. of Article III. PARKING of Chapter 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, of the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 12-54. parking prohibited in specified places. No person shall park or leave standing a motor vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to comply with the •.7~ °'~ ~ directions of a police officer or traffic-control device: (f) Any parking space reserved for the handicapped on a public street, highway, or other public way in the county or in privately owned parking areas open to the public, unless such vehicle displays a special license plate, decal or parking permit issued pursuant to sections 46.2- ii:: '~i{:. :'}i}ii:: *i:;Ji: :: ^::iiii:i::iY>}:. ''i::i?:}v:^iii:;{::'{}iii)}iiiiiq':;ii{:i} :vi:yYj<•i}iii:; 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after January 1, 1993. c:\wp50\agenda\handiprk.ord 2 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE ENACTING SEC. 12-102, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES INVOLVED IN ACCIDENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO REMOVE VEHICLES WHICH ARE IMPEDING THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC AND FOR THEIR STORAGE WHEREAS, Article IV. "Accidents" of Chapter 12, "MOTOR VEHICLES" of the Roanoke County Code provides authority for Roanoke County Police Officers to investigate motor vehicle accidents; and WHEREAS, 46.2-1212 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes local governing bodies to enact an ordinance providing for the removal and storage of vehicle involved in accidents which impede the orderly flow of traffic; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a new Sec. 12-102 "Removal of vehicles involved in accidents" of Article IV. "Accidents" of Chapter 12 "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC" of the Roanoke County Code is enacted as follows: Sec. 12-102. Removal of vehicles involved in accidents. Whenever a motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer involved in an accident is so located as to impede the orderly flow of traffic, any Roanoke County Police Officer may (i) at no cost to the owner or operator remove the motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer to some point in the vicinity where it will not impede the flow of /~ traffic or (ii) have the vehicle removed to a storage area for safekeeping and shall report the removal to the Department of Motor Vehicles and to the owner of the vehicle as promptly as possible. If the vehicle is removed to a storage area under clause (ii), the owner shall pay to the parties entitled thereto all costs incidental to its removal and storage. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\accident.ord 2 G,. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 16.1-25. INSPECTION OF RECORDS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER AND OR ARTICLES LISTED IN SUCH RECORDS., OF ARTICLE II. DEALERS, OF CHAPTER 16.1, PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ITEMS KNOWN TO BE STOLEN. WHEREAS, Sec. 16.1-25 of the Roanoke County Code requires precious metals dealers to admit law enforcement officers to their premises during business hours to examine their records and any item believed to be missing or stolen; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended 54.1-4101.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to authorize law enforcement officers to take possession of any item known to be missing or stolen on the premises of a precious metal dealer in order to preserve the item as evidence or to prevent its transfer; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 8, 1992; and the second reading was held on September 22, 1992; BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 16.1-25. "Inspection of records required by chapter and of articles listed in such records." of Article II. "Dealers" of Chapter 16.1 "Precious Metals and Gems" of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: L ..~ a Sec. 16.1-25. Inspection of records required by chapter and of articles listed in such records. .;:::.:.;;.:;:.;:::::>:>;;:.;:.;:.;;:.:::>:;.:::.;:.;;::;;:.: to his ~ ~ ~? Every dealer ~`oh~:::3:<:::>ntplt`:~?~ shall admit ~! .::::::::::..::::::::::::... 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\precmet.ord 2 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 17-2. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 17-14. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS., AND SEC. 17-15. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS GENERALLY., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, SEC. 17-75. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES., OF DIVISION 3. COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION, AND SEC. 17-86. DEFINITIONS., OF DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES, OF ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF CHAPTER 17 PROCUREMENT CODE OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT BY WHICH FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS MAY BE INCREASED BY THE PURCHASING AGENT, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS ARE REQUIRED, TO AMEND THE CONDITIONS FOR COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION WITH QUALIFIED OFFERORS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND RAISE THE CEILING FOR SMALL PURCHASES AND PURCHASES RELATED TO 1~iICROCOMPUTERS. WHEREAS, Sections 17-2, 17-14, 17-15, 17-75 and 17-86 set forth certain definitions and requirements of the County's Procurement Code in accordance with state enabling legislation; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended 1i-37, 11-41, 11-55 and 11-58 of the Code of Virginia to expand the category of professional services, to raise the ceiling for purchases not requiring competitive sealed bids or competitive negotiation and for purchases of microcomputers and related equipment and services, to expand the authority of the purchasing agent to increase the amount of fixed-price contracts without prior written approval of the governing body and to increase the minimum amount of public construction contracts for which performance and payment bonds are required; and V ~ Ot~ WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance took place on September 8, 1992; and the second reading took place on September 22, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 17-2. "Definitions.", Sec. 17-14. "Modification of Contracts.", Sec. 17-15. "Performance and payment bonds generally." of Article I. "In General", Sec. 17-75. "Provisions applicable to procurement of professional services." of Division 3. "Competitive Negotiation", and Sec. 17-86. "Definition." of Division 4. "Small Purchases" of Article II. "Competitive Procurement" of Chapter 17 "PROCUREMENT CODE" of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 17-2. Definitions. Professional services: Work performed by an independent contractor within the scope of the practice of accounting, ....:::.:::.............::::::::.:..:::,:.;:.;:.;~.;;::.;: landsca e P a~~~~:~a_~~~~~~, architecture, land surveying, .::::::::.:...:..:...:......:............................. . architecture, law, medicine, optometry~'3it or professional engineering. 2 "` ~ whichever is smaller, without the advance written approval of the Board of Supervisors. Sec. 17-15. Performance and payment bonds generally. (a) Upon the award of any public construction contract ...; .. ; :, .. 'iii:. ~~.:"; : '..::.::. ~ : <;;::;.`c :':: ~ ' .Mt~:~:l~:-~:::::i;410~:~~;:~:i::::i::~: ~~ ,:~:;:~~ ~; r: ~:.>:;~:. exceeding x~:>a~~::::::~.;:.;~::.::.:::.:::::.:::.::.:::.::.:::::: :::::::::::.:...:...:......... to any prime contractor, such or shall furnish to•the Board of Supervisors the following contract bonds: (1) A performance bond in the sum of the contract amount conditioned upon the faithful performance of the contract in strict conformity with the plans, specifications and conditions of the contract. (2) A payment bond in the sum of the contract amount. Such bond shall be for the protection of claimants who have and fulfill contracts to supply labor or materials to the prime contractor to whom the contract was awarded, or to any subcontractors, in the prosecution of the work provided for in such contract, and shall be conditioned upon the prompt payment for all such material furnished or labor supplied or performed in the prosecution of the work. "Labor or materials" shall include public utility services and reasonable rental of equipment, but only for periods when the equipment rented is actually used at the site. 3 ,~"" Sec. 17-75. Provisions applicable to procurement of professional services. (b) The purchasing agent shall engage in individual discussions with a~ offers deemed fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses and with emphasis on professional competence to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. Such offerors shall be encouraged to elaborate on their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the proposed project, as well as alternative concepts. These discussions may encompass nonbinding estimates of total project cost, including where appropriate, design, construction and life cycle costs. Methods to be utilized in arriving at price for services may also be discussed. Proprietary information from competing offers shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. Sec. 17-86. Definition. For the purpose of this division, small purchases shall be defined as purchases of goods, services, equipment, insurance, construction or other items needed in the day-to-day operations of x ::....:...::::::::: the county, the monetary value of which does not exceed ~t .... ...::::..:. .:.. . .....::.~ ::::::::::::::::::.. dollars ~1::.:>;:.;;:.;:.;;;;;:.;:.;:.::.::. ::............... 4 ~~ 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after October 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\procurc.ord ~ /-ra AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-9 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September 22, 1992, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows: 1. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.09 Miles of Ashbury Court, 0.20 Miles of Ashbury Drive, and 0.07 Miles of Greenmont Court into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly. 3. Request for Acceptance of Buckhorn Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for Acceptance of Christopher Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Request for Acceptance of Forest Creek Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Request for Public-Private Partnership Funds for an Industrial Building in Southwest Industrial Park. 7. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. 8. Acceptance of Donations of Right-of-way and Drainage Easement for Flintlock Road in Connection with the Hunting Hills Road Project. 9. Adoption of Resolution Endorsing the Passage of the State Referenda Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. 10. Approval of Raffle Permit from Cave Spring Elementary School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution after discussion of Item 7, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development A-92292-9.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.09 Miles of Ashbury Court, 0.20 Miles of Ashbury Drive, and 0.07 Miles of Greenmont Court into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective August 25, 1992: Meadows of Trent 0.09 Miles of Ashbury Court (Route 1072) 0.20 Miles of Ashbury Drive (Route 1073) 0.07 Miles of Greenmont Court (Route 1074) SUBMITTED BY: .~°d - Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson ~ To ( ) Minnix x Nickens ___x_ cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ACTION NO. A-92292-9.b ITEM NUMBER L~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on October 28, 1992. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File L --~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that. may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seq. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: RAFFLE PERMIT Name of Organization Street Address ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~,~~/S ~; VL 5~ri Mailing Address ~~ ~ ~ f--~f`~~~-/~l5 ,~ ~~ ~ ~~' City, State, Zip Code ,~~ // Ct h ~/C C! (JAY ~`j f ~ 1 Gam- ~~C/ Purpose and Type of Organization When was the organization founded? Roanoke County meeting place? (check one) BINGO GAMES c3 ~ 3c: (.~,`I~~~t tt ~ vim: ~.,~ Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES NO Is the organization non-profit? /YES NO Federal Identification Number ~1 ce ~ ~{/ (G ~ ~ ~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. Officers of the Organization: ~r President: ~.ryl~ ~ //~IC~ Vice-President ~~~%~A~ f/~!' ~ ~~y.~ ~;,~ Address: / ~~~,~~,(+.~C~L ~lv~ ~~ Address: ~~y~, t-t-~c~.'1l ~~,~~ 7 Secretary: ~~!~~%'G1 L-,~iu~'L ~ Treasurer: ~ ~L~Z~x~ r ~~ ~ nl~ y ~~n Address : ~,~5 U "~ul1C3~~5 l~~c. ~ Address : , ~ `-~ ~,~ /) >~~=%c~ .5 ~ (~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations: Name : ~ ~ya~l ~ / ~ ~= ~ ~P~"~ ~ ~L Home Address ~~~~~ ~i~Ll~~y% ~~I,~~/i.~-~ ~~i~~~l( ~U~ Phone ~ ~i,~ ~~ ~ ~5~~,/ Bus Phone f - '~t, 3 ~ ~" "~S .~l :3 A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. `~/3~ ~~/l~~ls G ~~`"IK' t r'wr^ ~ ~lu>yu~(~ ~ t1~W/~l~"~ RAFFLES: Date of Drawing ~ Time of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 "~/ a. 1V,1{ Z05 a ~~~~ ~r (~, ,-, ~~~e~---- State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~ a r ~ ~ f ~ 1 ~, . '~ '~ , i %`~ ~'. ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~ . - 1 ~ _ ~ ~ r, ~~ ~~ , ~-~- ~~ /' /' yf" ~ ~~~~ G . fi ~~ 5 ~~ (~/ RUC f ,f ~~ ,. ,. ~- . ~, ,~ (r'~ ~~~ ~7u~i ~-V ~~ ~f=-~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, _~..,~~ ,, S ~ 5 Gam. ,; (. ~ ~ ~. ~, 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State ZIP Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of B'3~ngo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Bingo Games or Raffles? 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all records required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? " 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a permit has been issued? 1 /,~ . 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~_ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or Raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report nii~st be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ! 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? `!; '; il. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or _ __ conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operations, or conduct of any such game or raffle? 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? ~~` 5 ,- 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? `i- 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its membership to this application form? ~ " 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal !roperty, or both and identify exempt property. ,{-i-5f ~kZ~~ ~~ ~C'hV LJ~(Jv '~' ~ ~~qd ~^1t G-' /~/l C7J ~e,'~-f'// CG'~`/C CL ~~ V ! ~~~~'~i2 ' ~a~~1 17. State the specific type and .purpose of the organization. ~, , _ ~ ~- ~ C~cr~-~ c~~i -f-V' 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? i/~'C (lf so, attach copy of registered agent.) ~- Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? ~/FS (If so, attach copy of exemption.) T~ , ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value 1 ~~~~ ~ ,~ 6~~ ~~v~~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of the Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written `= invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of instant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three. years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 7 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are expected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501C Internal Revenue Code Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hundred dollars. c: No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~£~~~~~~ ~ ~~tiC~`~ '~c~~/c~ L~~~`~~C;~~~Lf~ yr~l~r~,~u~,~y~~~~ ~$~~jc:~ ~i'uC~~y !~/c. ~ ,~,w j(~u~Ll~~ ~.. Name Title Home Address C' .-~ Subscribed and sworn before me, this _~,'J~day of ~19~ in the County/C-~~ of ~° ~'r_c% , Virginia. _ . _ My commission expires: ~~~~Z ~ ~ 19 1 l~ ~-~~//yrll~n9a G ~~ ~~1~ %~~ / Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have eff t until December 31st of this calendar year. ~- .. ~'~ D to C ssi ner~ f the Reve e The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue "~'r 9 ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-9.C REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BUCRHORN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Buckhorn Road North of Hunting Hills Drive to cul-de-sac and South of Hunting Hills Drive to cul-de-sac to be accepted pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 63, of record in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was opened to public use prior to July 1, 1980, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that no speculative interests are involved. 5. That said road known as Buckhorn Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation xo < i• - .~ I ~ aEO ~. / ~~ r UNiING y __ _., -, '~* Y p0. _ ASTOR MV ~NUNi/NG N!((.$!~`I• 42 ~u ~ «P • I ~ I i4 STER~F18§OUNTRY~O ~y Q 10l< ~ t t _ ~ Ra~Nmes g\."~ )EN AV C Y ~ >S< SKVLANO RD 3 ~ 'O O O b Oc ' P 2 ~ m HUNTING ' ~pp ~~~~ M`~ I g~.p~p~~~ W o ~ T NO H' plLO Ott ~ 6 ~0~4<CON RIO y~4933 N c.+~ N_MOU UN~'°°° _`'~ VI CINI T Y 117AP• ~~ ~~~_ _ .. ~~ NORTH Stop ~ 6 S Y • $ \ I ~a / un Asn O I / 16 . sw J ' • 7 , / b -8Ob ~ O ~ I Ewa. " I ~y 1'! O uzx 4 • •• t uxs r "~' ro ,. ? i I x la 9h + e S92AC ¢ zs.' '.a ~H 25 u 13 ~°'" _ A•x{ YN Ixs pf 3 + "' `+ 5' ,w I 9 S ~ ux m O '~ ~ 8 24 ~ 21 - 8,12-1-21 `'~ ~ s .•>• ~ O 2 q a ~ '. ' II sons J r een „/ ~u ? = • v ° 12 sus eal • ~ / Dr. ~ " • t .,.. ` . / ,.~ „ ~ E ~ $ : ' - ~n __' i / Hd\a ro • ~l „~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY +,s. ~pM / ~ 24 ' os j ~'1 .pt. .cos 9 .u - 1 Y_ `26 2 DESCRIPTION: ~O 12 27 ~ • ~ 1) Buckhorn road north of Hunting Hills e ~" .., a a "" ~~ Drive to cul-de-sac and South of Hunting 2B• $• - ~~ .,~ Hills Drive to cul-de-sac. 27 ' 22 2 LENGTH : (1) 0.3 6 MILES \ ~ RIGHT OF WAY : (1) 5 0 FEET ~ ~ Oi '"' ~ ROADWAY WIDTH : (1) 3 0 FEET ~. ~= SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET 1 ` am SERVICE: (1) 18 HOMES 1 ~ 21 ~ •.,» ' \\ , - .911 • r A / ' ~ , i i s 'r9 ~~1 ~~ 20 16 O •sz Xuntlnq ~ `~ ' } O a ~ . g •s•s - I ~ ~ u Y 4y P .b ~ znM * I •s•s IB ` I ' •sa 19 ,. 7 i 31 + ~ + 4 ' .sa ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF BUCKHORN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING & OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION # ITEM NUMBER `~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Buckhorn Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Buckhorn Road is one (1) of several roads within the Hunting Hills Subdivision, which were placed on the 1985 Road Bond List. Staff has developed plans for the various corrective actions required to bring this road into the VDOT's Secondary System. Prior to acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation and the assigning of state route numbers to the above road, staff has to submit a complete package of information, including Board Resolutions requesting acceptance of this road. FISCAL IMPACTS Funds for surveying, engineering, and administrative work on these roads are funded within the yearly roadway activity of the Engineering & Inspections Department. Construction funds will come from the Rural Addition Funds. These construction funds are available in the accounts administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. No appropriation of County funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Board approve the resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Buckhorn Road into VDOT's Secondary System. L-3 BY: APPROVED BY: ~~o~1d Cove~r,~Direc or Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & In pections County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To __ Minnix Nickens 2 L-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BUCRHORN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Buckhorn Road North of Hunting Hills Drive to cul-de-sac and South of Hunting Hills Drive to cul-de-sac to be accepted pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 63, of record in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was opened to public use prior to July 1, 1980, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that no speculative interests are involved. 3 L-3 5. That said road known as Buckhorn Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 ~'! RD UNTI Q RED ~,G ` i / -_ v •/ _~_ ASTOR ~ ND r ~4 t 4V iNUNT/N6 NICLS 'r vTRY C [UB 0U ~r ~, OR . M4 qF E ~ GEP HOH _ ~ z • .. R urouE ~ l ~" ESCER _ . pq FI 4 !_ R t 2_ __. a~ e . am¢ // ~a i' . _ Site ~ ~ ~f~~ ~~ SK~'~AND RD 3 0 O (~ P~ ~ Q ~ -''~ QN- ~J ' ,, v~ ~p1 lED DR. m HUNTING ~9 O ~~ a o RID E~ ~~~ ~766 r4~~6 ~O t.~, • - H O ~ (C0 ~ °~"° ~ . . S~ '~ '~MOU TuNn'400 `~ fog _ o Q VI CINI T Y ,111A P+ ~~ ~~~__ _ ~ ^ b ~`n y° bl9 ~ yen J I / , I6 s aM 3 ° " 7 a~ O b °, O .4 I ,°° - ~y 15 O ~ezz 4 + °ezs S P. t spas / _ ~ezs 7 19 i 9 ~` k n 14 6 ° L e ¢ I 1i Y ~ ° ' a sin + + y.92AC 3 25 a.~ 13 ° +°'n = b16 bsi ~~ 3 w's• ° tzs n . z 8 m' 11 6712-I-21 "~ ~ y •a9e ° ~~ O 2 W Y ~ + 9009 d - D 11 ~ °,e i say 2 + + - 12 9 'All `jO/°~ 7, \~ ` /9~9 O!. ~ 23 ~° ~ _ 901 .n w=T i i ~{dU W y r,i ~ °t _ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY y,. ~n„M ~ i " = 24 g . .5U9 ~, _ ~, 2S °g DESCRIPTION: ~~ 12 23 ~ -. 1) Buckhorn road north of Hunting Hills o ~" 19/I a S '9N Drive to cul-de-sac and South of Hunting S $ 26 • - . ~ A Hills Drive to cul- de-sac. \ „~ \ 27 ' LENGTH : (1) 0.3 6 MILES ~• ~ 22 `'° . a ~ „ RIGHT OF WAY : (1) 5 0 FEET s ~ ~ '~' w ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET ^ '° - .9z, WIDTH: ` 21 `~ ~ SERVICE • (1) 18 HOMES 1 ~ •°9,9 \ ' ~ - - /90 ~ ' \ o f u, + ' ~ Yi - s9 ~\1 °j ~ / /F I 20 °9M O ~ I6 +W 4 ~ 'nz Huntlnq ~ S e° ~ ,p • ' - 1999 . a e ,~ e + ~ u~° 19°9 I6 /916 y 31 - + I B J F ' ~m ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF BUCKHORN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING & OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT L Y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-9.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHRISTOPHER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Christopher Drive from the intersection of Cotton Hill Road (State Route 688) to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.27 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1- 229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Cotton Hill Estates, Section 3 Subdivision, which map was recorded in Plat Book 12, Page, 190 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on September 7, 1990, and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage easements and a right-of-way for the street. 3. That said road known as Christopher Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation i~ f NORTH I ~ C0770N N/LC EgTA lES// c \ O l COTTON N/LC E~iTAIEZ ~~/ '~ _~/~'Op~~•~Q+~^E ro°-B~_ _ i ~^ / ~icc /, Col 3 ,i ~~~. L ~ hec 2, Cof 9 tiM1\~ • ~ ~ : Lei. Bt~r _ _ Md /; F~ /eD % ~-~ ib ~ o 4 MD //, Pg /ZD ~~ EXI~iT '49'PUE -~ '~ ~ ~ % / C07JON H.C: E5.*.t7E5~ S Z 91um '.ts, axe /, Cof Z.{ ~ .L P 'c moo. 0\ Onal ! --20' R.al o' / t/ ~ C' W Onntwa,cao E T ~ ~ ~ t0 ~ ~C~ ~~ '3 f ~ ~ fTV° W ~. ^O +i~ t ~. ~/ ~ /3 °~ ~ ~~$ ~~~,n~r-i~~~~ ^a LOT /O ~' 'q 4\~/• ~ Q /. /G / A o~ A c z L //L A e z I' lL;l" / 0 A c _ -. o_ ~' ':a ano°wow,• S'SCOPEQJE(Z t, \?' ~ 'I ~ /TfHES ours/ ~ n lT - ,~ ~ L 7 Ac _ ~ ~ ~. ~'e `o'- ~. (trv) • Do:MOC~ -TA/S ASR r.c' ~X PE E9MJ i1~3 a6 /ret~ Q U ~~ \ -C19- 99.8/ I. BB-- -l6°.~ TJi9--.--_ '~ ~~~ ~'~ • 'r l~ p~I^E> ~ 'oy \~.'\ P~. o~',c~. CNR/670PHER OR/ E O R _ - `'e•vue "~ oLEFPYu .J E /i! _ - r 'MB " ~// J -- ~ /O'9LCL'.- ~ OT /Co a ti 'M 0!s 04-t .a9 0 DJ ~ GvuE '~01,V// CRq/NAyE E'. \c"is~. Z. 5lo5 Ac n. C~~ aft. ~\ ' $$ ~ ?b`.~, no 1,9 T2J iILOTURRL in i ® a ®y ^' P.1/5 AREA) ~ n' Ty\,\ ~~ a ~e'~ ORA/NRCEWAY ~ N ~~^. ~°h 2842 Ac. ~q' 4'c\••~ E ~~ o~(~~ w n i 27°'J ^ E ,y°° ~~4.a.~0 ry LOT /9~ ro LOT /$ ~` -- .--`"~'~,„fc°•s -. 0.89GAe '^078roAe.'^0.759AeaN• /` ~„~ier~~'~''~ ~ ~-.,_~J PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Christopher Drive from the intersection of Cotton Hill Road (State Route 688) to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.27 miles. LENGTH: (1) 0.27 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CHRISTOPHER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING do DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 a ^ t f t t I '~ r ITEM NUMBER L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Christopher Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Prestige Builders Developers, Inc., the developer of Cotton Hill Estates, Section 3, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Christopher Drive from the intersection of Cotton Hill Road (State Route 688) to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.27 miles. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and found the road acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Christopher Drive into the Secondary Road System. TTED BY: ~, APPROVED: ~~ Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe tions County Administrator ~~ `~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~'" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHRISTOPHER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Christopher Drive from the intersection of Cotton Hill Road (State Route 688) to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.27 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1- 229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Cotton Hill Estates, Section 3 Subdivision, which map was recorded in Plat Book 12, Page, 190 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on September 7, 1990, and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage easements and a right-of-way for the street. 3 ~-y 3. That said road known as Christopher Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 ~-- NORTH \ /6 / / SCC. /, LOT v / \ ~ ~ i~ -s m•oa. ~ ; COTTON N/CL EgTA reS./ ~~.• o~ 1/ ~ zso. oo.-,x •F so1.-sa/-,~ G~ c /, Laf 3 \ _ L ~, ~ C07TON N/CC E~iTA/E~i ~ - - _ ' 2ec Z, Cot9 ryM1, ~ ~ ~`f B.~ ~/ COTTON N%=~FST-17E522 SZ /z MB //, P /23 { ~ Sec /, Cat Z: Slump ~, o~. Onae ' -ZC' RA/N °`.~• / ~/ ~ .pC y J`io:~• ~ ~u Ono actG ~..W E T oO, ~ +. ~ ~ ZO „C~ ~~ t4l ~ ~ E ~ / ^" - ~ °•. /a) C' Lei ~ 6 ~o e~ ~ G /4 /3 .. L ~°' .nH GOT/O `'~ /4 d~/// ~ s? / /G/A ~' / Ac z L//L AC z ~ o ~9 / 0 Ac a ;esi °- ~ z -p ~ ~ a~~ L.aROV. NouSE S'YOFL°~JE. Csro J n (iB, ~~//yp~~AG~+. \ .cL \~//C/-/,~~\ ~ /TCHES OUTS/ ~ / \ °.. sJ V yQC f ~~ (7rY) • B~C~ _L//S A/fE yA f;0 °X GE E9Mf if6'p5 ~ Y i iNB`~°~sOO G ' ~, ~S{0~ ~ _ ~C]9-_/s 9H. Bl L I. BB-_ 1-~--f61.v 17i9 ._ ~ j' ~ 09'OJ'21 •E 'Sy l,'~ % ~ ~ ~.~, J1J. 0p ' '~%°~ CHR / gTO.PHER OR% E O R e. /s' vu E o 9 q 7CEElry.4p Ih P J J 9 0 -__I . _ fm.oa .:os. cfo =; ~~~~~--~ OB /tar c~ E~ _1 - - t - ~ '~ OT /Ca wry TM 4a Oa-t '/C'9C.C-'~ 4 0~ 19 ~ '7l - 5'OC/E ~ ~ D/WNACE ES .Tb..,a, w o C d S~. `/ I $ o l5/OE D/TCHE „ ~9 ` o~. ti ~ ® v ®, m ® rY/5 AREA) ^ y~ \~ N B~'9 TO NATUiLQL N ' ee `^ COT /7 -~~~`, -~ D~fq/rVRCiEWAY ~ ~ :N •ry Z.64Z AC. ~\~~~ Rp•~gCE n : ` u6674 vo^w 1~'~~~a~ tili m ~ n ~0nry GOT /9^ry LOT/$ : /r~1a' ~^ E°j~r pO _"'=~'°o:,,,"ca-~ -. ~0.89G Ac '^078GAc "0759ACmry ~ ~ / N ~ 4~~-~ ~~ - ^- J PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Christopher Drive from the intersection of Cotton Hill Road (State Route 688) to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.27 miles. LENGTH: (1) 0.27 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CHRISTOPHER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 s ~~: ~~,-~ ~* AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-9.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST CREEK DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: L-> 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Forest Creek Drive, from its intersection with Forest Edge Drive to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Forest Edge Section 3, and Forest Edge Section 1, Subdivisions which maps were recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 63, and Plat Book 10, Page 29 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on January 23, 1990, and October 29, 1986, respectively, and that by reason of the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage easements and a right-of-way for the street. 3. That said road known as Forest Creek Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the a State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~--~ a.~.,~- ~ . Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation t fOIEi( fOGF OAryE ~n ~ SE(,. ~ FOREbT EDGE " GOGATION MAP Ni 6fltf 4M '' £'ifN., n°` "``•2~ ~VICINI TY ,MAP L-5 NORTH //~~ M ~ t.l a ~.ON a b ~ ~ Ol'KI ~~ i . V~ ~~ N o ~~~ ~~9 ~ `1 •p~ ~ ~ ~'A a ~. e ,' ° c r_ ` ~ q b~c~ b•W ,fit ~l` c v~ _ V f • ,r °., ~ ~ O. !~ sa i o m V ~- r c.~ O •vn m c " ~ \~, ~ o ~ ( ~~yyb • $ N I ~ n ~ q r 4r ~ 5 O b YN 4 t.a ~ -. iczi w.~.c000` ~C o :'t.~ .w ~ ti n'~ `rv ~ ~ ,~. ; ,Y e " ~ .W .. wo e a $ :m $ b ~ ~~` ~- 4 ~A p `r W v Jd c 0:. L ~ r9p*~ p ~ W ~ ~ f q - ~~ V N O O ° b 7i. 4 .+e • e ~• ~ b 4 ~ „t y ~ o • Q ~_ cct :b p ,~ p i. O ~ - ~. • a a ~ ~ N D n .. W . • .N a ,~ .N ~ a`~°..m f11 N ~ N ~ Np ~~ r ~' q o crnai F t~ N Ed flf a ~ ' .~ a V t a~ • 4 a vt. v ' m: L n p 4: N r Of • w •-+ 0 ti o . V ti o _ ~ : t z N . Sao r 1 (n 0~ . ~ _y'..d _ ~. •z~ 4 m .. .. r D + ~.. .Z _ n PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Forest Creek Drive from the intersection of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) to the cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) .28 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST CREEK DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING ~• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 ITEM NUMBER ~~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Forest Creek Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Fralin & Waldron, Inc., the developer of Forest Edge Section 3, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.28 miles of Forest Creek Road, from its intersection with Forest Edge Drive to the cul-de-sac. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Forest Creek Drive into the Secondary Road System. ED BY: 1 A~bld Covey, Dire~eY' of Engineering & Inspect APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator rL -~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to __ Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 2 L--" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST CREEK DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Forest Creek Drive, from its intersection with Forest Edge Drive to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as Forest Edge Section 3, and Forest Edge Section 1, Subdivisions which maps were recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 63, and Plat Book 10, Page 29 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on January 23, 1990, and October 29, 1986, respectively, and that by reason of the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage easements and a right-of-way for the street. 3 LS 3. That said road known as Forest Creek Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 _ __ ~~ fO~E~/ EoGF WIryE ~~ i21 bE~.°3 . FORES-_ T E04E GOGAl70N MAP No Sc~LE 419 ~ J'°OEn,,_ °° ~'E.2~ VI CINI T Y ,MAP' pe a-, u~or~ orsu e , w a~ -4 ~'v `" r V y0 ~ ro fE~.9EOS A•t0 .~'za ~ ~ ~zo: V•O a`m, .o moc cr ~ •A ~ ,~ ~ ~ u..r 0 4~V-. _~~ V r~ v + -~ ~ N x. °~ Sze $ 'N V ~ r y am- w ~ ~Wy ((y~ (1i 0 iizat ~czV ~b •~ •°~ d ~gr ~ etvm co .N ~ WO w -•~ +p ~oz.•. ~ v j•A y r Nv •c rsc°a`~ •f .o v•N a - v m` c•w ~ b_ i~ ` ~ .W . WNN N oc` ~_ C1 wm.-Lm$~ may s=~ ,°o V'% ~Q w ~ o-` o"w -e.- ~~ O Oizo sn M ~ n •~ 'B~ c~ °r • V •+ O d 4 cD ~ N pc~ ~- J +~ 7 ~ ~ ~ i0 o w ~, N~ W °n 0 .c.a °" O ov m u ~cc ~~e~' 0.O #_ %~~ro 1 °Jm N ~ N v °N ~ W a i N' •~ °' m N `g 1 a •N o z•nu ` ,~~ avro i+y O HIV ~ ~ r W. ~~ ~ N Ed a' a v m ~ u w: ~~ ^+ ti0 _ e _ .. _ - PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Forest Creek Drive from the intersection of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) to the cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) .28 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST CREEK DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 r,,. ACTION N0. 92292-9.f Item No. ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public-Private Partnership Funds for an industrial building in Southwest Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR~B COMMENTS: ,/ .~/~-~-~ BACKGROUND: Southwest Industrial Park was Roanoke County's first public-private partnership in 1986. Roanoke County expended $193,852 in public funds for water,, sewer, and road improvements which opened up approximately fifty-five (55) acres of land for industrial development. Eight companies have located in Southwest Industrial Park and Corrugated Container Corporation has expanded their building and operations. Currently, these companies pay an annual total of $53,271 in real estate taxes. Twenty-seven (27) acres is vacant and available for development. Gorman Howell has constructed several of the buildings in Southwest Industrial Park. He is currently constructing a 7,500 square foot building for multi-tenant use. One company, Primedica, is consolidating its home health care products division into a portion of the building. Mr. Howell is requesting that Roanoke County share in the cost of a water and sewer connection so that he might lease the remaining portion of the building, 3,000 square feet, to a manufacturing user. FISCAL IMPACT: The Economic Development Fund has a balance of $92,793.44 as of August 31, 1992, in unappropriated funds. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Howell's project is estimated to cost $175,000. Real estate taxes on the land/building would be $2,373. The cost of a connection for sewer and a 5/8-inch water meter is $3,420. Roanoke County's portion would be $1,710. Payback for this investment of public-private partnership funds would occur within the first year of the project. ,~- ,,,,,- L-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Roanoke County enter into a public-private partnership with Gorman Howell and invest $1,710 as one half of the cost of a connection to Roanoke County's water and sewer systems. Respectfully submitted: Timothy W. Guba a, Director Economic Development Approved: ~~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ~ Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred Minnix to Nickens Attachment cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Clifford Craig, Director, Utility No Yes Abs x x x x x +GORMAN Inc. P~EALTORS 9 LIBRARY SQUARE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 703-389-5803 SEPTEMBER 14 , "1992 CY~JI~IIY OF ROANt~ DEPAI71ME1dI' OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 29800 ROAN~~1~, VA . 24018 ATTN: MR GUBALA RE: IPIL~!1STRIAL BUILDING L~X_'ATE~ IN SOCTI'IIVJFSI' I PJUt 1STRI AL PA.P.} ' AT h 5: i r. C?1~h4~?1•NaE11LTH DR . S . W . DEAR SIR, I AM IN TIC PROC`F~S OF Bl IILDTNG A 7 , 800 ~~l iARE F~~t?T I11Dt iSIRIAL STRUGTIJRE AT THE ABA.>VE ADDRESS . WITH THE HELP C?F YCRJR DEPAF7IMENT, I HAVE SUCCF.5SF11LLY PLACED FRIMEDICA HEALTH CARE IN 3, 300 SQt1ARE FEET OF 'I1-)E SPACE. THE BALANCE OF Tl~ BUILDING WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANCYIF~ TENANT. A.S YOU 1WOW, I HAVE DEVELOPE,'C? SEVERAL gL1ILDINC7S IN THE COUNTY AS FOLLOWS; 1. SCKJII~-IF~1STERN OPTICAL SUPPLY 6490 COMMONWEAITH DR. S.W. 6.000 SQ. FT. 2 . NOBLE-MEI' LTD . 6540 COI~IONWEALTH DR. S.W. 6,000 SQ. FT. 3. ARCtIITECIURAL WOOD FROL?UCTS 6525 COMMONWEALTH DR. S.W. 7 , 500 Sit . FT . 4. UIBF.~1T VALVE C'O. VALZEYPOIIJ'I'E FART{ 4,000 SQ. FT. IN VIEW OF MY EFFORTS IN DEVETAPIrIG THE PROPERTY AT 6535 C~~JNWEALTH DR., I AM HEREBY REQUESTING THE COLiM'Y TO PAfffICIPATE IN THE PRr.~7ECT BY PROVIDING UTILITY HOOk11PS AT A RIDUCID COST, SINCE THIS TYPE OF PRc~,JECT WILL PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT OPFOR'TUNI"TIES . I AM I NSTALI,I Nr, A 5/ 8 ~ ~ WATER METER AND TF~ COST I S F~~i~~BTFT~ ~T ~;1;10p:i~iy AT 'i~-II;~ TINC: PLEA,~~E CALL N'~ IF YC~t l 1~1~ AT~'Y ADI>ITI~?idAL INFC>RMATION . THANI{S , GORMAN HO4TII T , CONSULTANTS APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT ~. °~- ,. ~ 4 f ACTION NO. A-92292-9.g ITEM NO. L- 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: l1~"~°`~~~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc. over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck. BACKGROUND' In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town. Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation. The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows: February 11, 1992 $1,151.95 March 24, 1992 1,437.59 May 26, 1992 2,363.43 June 23, 1992 1,779.16 September 8, 1992 228.71 FISCAL IMPACTS' $868.75 in current fees to be paid from the Board contingency fund. 1 ~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the payment of this invoice from the Board's contingency fund. Respectfully submitted, ,~, ~.. ~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Edward G. Kohinke Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x cc: Diane Hyatt c;\wp51\agenda\generalVegal.fee cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ~' . ~ .,, _ , _._s,:~ TOWN OF VINTON P. O. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE (703) 983-0608 fAX (703/ 983-0621 September 9, 1992 TO: Joe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney County of Roanoke POB 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 o ~i JOAN-$: fl~RBtS1i----"°'~" ~-- FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER ~ STATEMENT ~ Statement From Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC For Professional Services Rendered Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company September 2, 1992 Statement -- $1,737.50 Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To Town of Vinton $868.75 August 5, 1992 Statement -- $457.42 Fifth Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To Town of Vinton 228.71 DUE UPON RECEIPT $1,097.46 MAKE CHECK PA.YARLE TO: TOWN OF VINTON CC: Diane D. Hyatt A-92292-9.h ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of donations of right-of-way and drainage easement for Flintlock Road in connection with the Hunting Hills Road Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following right-of-way and drainage easement for Flintlock Road to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in connection with the Hunting Hills Road Project in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) A parcel, area, or section of land, being fifty feet (50') in width, and designated as "FLINTLOCK ROAD" upon a plat entitled "Map of Section No. 8, Hunting Hills" and "Revised Map of Section No. 8, Hunting Hills," dated July 16, 1975, made by T. P. Parker & Son, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 63, and Plat Book 9, page 164, respectively. b) A drainage easement, varying in width from 7.5' to 16.04', from Mark R. Hanabury and Cathy R. Hanabury (Deed Book 1223, page 26) (Tax Map No. 87.12-2-22), shown and designated as "PROP. 7.5' DRAINAGE ESMT." on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated August 12, 1991. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. r- ~~ Respectfully submitted, c ie L. H m n Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Edward G.Kohinke Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utility "" ~- METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ~F' F ~j CURVE 'F' R 25.00 565• s3 Q8, ~~ OC' \ nq CH= N67 Il'21'E pS90 e ~~ `C 36.52 ~ RUR 1097.20 S' ~~/ ,~ Cb i = 116.11 ZN ~ CH= S6118.05 6'E 16p4 ~ Property of. CL MARK R. JR, & CATHY R. HANABURY ~ / ~~ / V` / y/ cuRVE •c• PRC1P,7,5'DRAINAGE / ~ti R = 25.00 L = 38.64 ESMT, ~,`O a~ ~~,~ CH= N24'00'S4'E l 34.91 ~ Z o~ ~'~ d CURVE 'B' 2/~ '~a R = 1525.00 Lj h° L = 199.64 p0 / CH= N64 '35'W /y~N~ B~ 199.50 ti~o/ j~~ 03/ .~~ TAX MAP N0. 87.12-2-22 SCALE: 1 5 PLAT SH[7WING PRC]P~SED DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONVEYED TD RCIAN~KE COUNTY BY MARK R. & CATHY R. HANABURY PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: os-12_91 ~-~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-9.i ENDORSING THE PASSAGE OF STATE REFERENDA ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, BALLOT, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Virginia's continued economic growth and development is dependent upon the Commonwealth's ability to provide for the needs of its citizens both now and into the 21st century; and WHEREAS, voters will have the opportunity to approve three bond referenda on November 3 that will provide funds to construct and renovate the facilities necessary to serve the state's growing population; and WHEREAS, $472.4 million is earmarked for the capital needs of higher education, providing badly needed classroom, laboratory and other teaching space, correction of life-safety code deficiencies, repairs to libraries, additions to computer centers, and other needs; and WHEREAS, $45.2 million is appropriated for the construction and renovation of seven high-priority projects for current and projected patient needs, particularly for children and elderly Virginians, enabling Virginia to meet legal mandates, and ensuring that state facilities will continue to receive Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements; and WHEREAS, $95.4 million is allocated to upgrade existing park facilities and purchase new land, enhancing Virginia's tourist potential and increasing the flow of out-of-state revenue to Virginia; and .' WHEREAS, passage of these three referenda will not jeopardize Virginia's AAA bond rating; taxes will not have to be raised; and passage will create 3,600 new jobs and generate $22 million in new revenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, endorses the passage of all three referenda on the November 3, 1992, ballot, authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors encourages the voters of Virginia to vote "YES" on each Question of whether the referendum should take effect. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Mental Health Association of Roanoke Valley Virginia Western Community College Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Director, Parks & Recreation Department Dr. Margaret Hagan, Director, Roanoke County Health Department Catawba Hospital The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder, Governor ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER C"""" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of Resolution Endorsing the Passage of the State Referenda Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Board Chairman Eddy has received a letter from the Mental Health Association of Roanoke Valley requesting that the Board of Supervisors endorse the State Bond Referenda by resolution. He has ascertained that the Board members support approval of this bond issue. If passed by the voters of the state, these bonds will provide funds for 130 projects at 60 facilities and institutions. Southwest Virginia will receive $123 million in construction funds. The three issues are for: (1) $472.4 million for Higher Education projects; (2) $95.4 million for Parks and Recreation projects; and (3) $45.2 million for Mental Health Facilities projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution endorsing the passage of the state referenda authorizing the issuance of General Obligation Bonds. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens L-q Mental Health • These bonds will fund six high-priority projects to meet the needs of Virginians with mental disabilities. • The projects are long-overdue and critically needed. They must be funded in some fashion, and G.O.bonds in a low interest-rate market are an efficient method. • Many of Virginia's mental-health facilities are aging and deteriorating, and lack basic safety features that comply with current building codes. The 1992 bonds will pay for renovations and upgrading of facilities. • The bonds will help fast-growing parts of the state meet unmet needs. For example, the number of beds at the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute has not changed for 20 years, even though the population it serves has doubled and is expected to increase by another 36 percent during the next decade. • Virginia needs to invest in high quality hospital and training centers for persons with mental disabilities. State facilities will continue to be an essential compo- nent of Virginia's mental health system, while we continue our commitment to develop a collaborative, well-integrated, community-based system of services. Parks and Natural Resources • Tourism is Virginia's second largest industry, provid- ingjobs for thousands of Virginians. Our state parks are vital to our tourism industry, with visitors to our parks adding $80 million annually to our state's economy. • Virginiaranks47thlowestinthenationintermsofstate park acreage per capita. Our parks are increasingly overcrowded and, as a result, are deteriorating as well. • About two-thirds of the bond proceeds will be used for 225 construction-related projects that will upgrade existing parks to make them more enjoyable for visi- tors, as well as create construction jobs for Virginians. • "The remaining bond funds will be used to expand our park system by buying land fornew parks. With cturent real estate market conditions, this is an opportunity for to acquire new land cost-effectively. • This bond also will protect rare, threatened, and endan- geredplant and animal species and natural habitats. Facrs ABOV~r V~cnvra's 1992 Bohn R~r~a Authorized by Virginians for Progress Foundation, REG. #VA 910485 ~` FACTS ABOUT vIRGIIYIA~S 1992 Bow REFERENDA General Background • On November 3rd of this year, Virginians will vote on three public-facility bond referenda: -$472.4 million for education, -$ 45.2 million for mental health, -$ 95.4 million forparks and natural resources. These are general-obligation ("G.O")bonds. Virgin- ianshave approved G.O. bonds for education, parks, and mentai health in the past: first, in 1968 at the urging of Governor Mills Godwin, and again in 1977, duringthesecondGodwinadministration.G.O. bonds are not the "pledge bond" proposals fumed down last year. Each project is specifically identified. There are no "blank checks." Issuing these bonds will not harm Virginia's "Triple- A" bond rating. As one of only five states rated "AAA" by Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch's ratings services, Virginia is considered to have rela- tively little G.O. debt, and this bond issue will not exceed conservative debt-to-revenue ratios. • Virginia's G.O. bond repayment history is excellent. The 1968 bond issue was paid off by 1985. The 1978 bonds will be paid off by 1997, with less than a third ofthe originalprincipalamountcun entlyremaining. • Just as a corporation borrows to build a new manu- facturing facility or an individual obtains a mortgage to finance the purchase of a home, Virginia's 1992 'r,~,; bond issue will be invested entirely in capital im- provements. None of the bond proceeds will be used for operating expenses of state government. Immediate Economic Benefit Although the primary purpose of the bonds is to meet critical capital requirements, there will be an imme- diate economic benefit to all Virginians. • The $600 million in constntction projects will ripple through our state's economy, generating an ultimate positive impact much greater than that amount. Construction of G.O: bond projects will create ap- proximately3,600newjobsandgenerate$22rnillion in additional general-fund revenues for Virginia. The positive economic impact will increase tax rev- enues to both state and local government and reduce outlays for unemployment, welfare, and other social services. All Virginians will benefit. Besides the economic benefits, the bonds will fund badly needed capital projects. They must be funded somehow, and G.O. bonds, with interest rates at atwo-decade low, are acost-effective methodofpaying forthese essen- tial facilities. Education • The 1992 bond issue is essential if Virginia's higher- education system is to maintain the level of quality that Virginians expect and to meet fimrre needs. State budget problems over the past two years have forced Virginia's colleges and universities to absorb $413 million in general-fund budget cuts and forgo $300 million of planned capital projects. As a result, vital construction and maintenance needs have been deferred, but they can be deferred no longer without fundamental damage to the system. There has been no state-supported capital-improve- mentprogram since 1986, yet enrollment in Virginia's higher education institutions has increased by 40,000 students since then and will increase by another 65,000 students by the yeaz 2000. Asaresult,thequalityofhighereducationfor Virginia's citildrenisdecliningas facilitiesbecomeovercrowded and deteriorate. For example, Virginia Tech needs 500,000 square feet ofnew space just to serve current enrollment. Of the educational and general space at our colleges and universities, l9 percent is more than 40 yeazs old; 28 percent is 20 to 40 years old. The 1992 education bond issue contains funds for 95 projects: 59 will add space for students and faculty, 27 are for renovations of old facilities, and nine are for improvements to utilities and infrastructure. A fiist-class higher-education system is a critical component ofeconomic growth. Business executives cite the quality ofa state's higher-education system as a key determinant in business-location decisions. This bond issue will help to ensure that our higher- educationsystem remains a strong asset to Virginia's business climate. ~-9 i HIGHER EDUCATION BOND PROJECTS Radtord University ~ Christopher Newport UniveMty Replacement of Wrasttticture 3,626,200 McConnell Labrary Addition Preston Hall Addition 4.692,900 3,811,000 Acgirrre Ferguson High School Phase III 1 Library Addition l 0,833,500 2,516,000 Reed Hall Renovation McGuffey Hall Renovation 2,534,400 3,159,900 , CNU Subtotal 16'15,700 College of Global Studies, Phase I 5,~,~ 200 198 19 ~ Clinch Vafley Coflege RU Subtotal , , Renovation of 2:ehmer Building Maintenance & Receiving Building 2,107,100 403,900 Richard Bland Colege Cammecce Hall & Chem. Bldg. Renov. 2,279,200 Labrary Addition Classroom Facility 1,400,700 4,600,000 Scknce Museum of Virginia Phase III Renovations 4 458100 > CVC Subtotal 8,511,700 Southwest Vhginia Higher Education Center Nevi' Consrtiuction: Higher Education Center 900,000 The College o[ Wifliem & Mary Undergtotmd Utility S Upgrade r 2,772,200 Statewide-Handicapped Access S 6,~16,~ Renovate James Blai Tercentenary Hall 5,290,000 6,107,600 University of Vh-ginia. Cabell, Halsey, Mmor Halls Renovations 4,610,900 Faciities Management Coi~lex W&M Subtotal 2,972,500 17,14200 Arts & Sciences Budding (Bryan) • Addition to Chemistry Building 4,592,600 8,010,000 Fruitier Culture Museum Dairy Bum Converaon 913,900 Addition to Medical Science Building Labrary StArage Facility 14,647,200 2.679,000 George Mason Univerity 500 383 9 Impmvemeats to Utihty and Sewer System UVa Subtotal 1,357,800 35,89700 Unn+er;ity Center Finley, Fast, West, Krug Halls Phase I prince Willliarri Campus , , 1,690,500 13,000,000 Virginia Commonwealth University Class/I,abJFaculty Ollices Renovations 5,095,800 , Canstnici Arluigton Metro Campus Business & Public Policy 12,896,100 10,098,300 Medical Sciences Building, Phase I Tompkins-McCaw Iabrsry Addition 17,767,100 1,592,900 GMU Subtotal 47,068,400 Fine Arts Center, Phase II MCV Biotechnology Research Park 10,942,600 5,000,000 James Madison Universi primary F.kcoical Upgade 7,703,300 VCU Subtotal ~~~~~ Fourth Floc Library Addition 4,183,400 Vhghila Commmdty Coflege System Physical Plant Building I-Iamson Hal18c Annex Renovation 7,918,500 1,104,300 Btae Ridge Community Coflege Improvements: Buildder~t~ A, C, D, E, F 753,300 Science & Tect>tiology Campus, Phase I 13,000,000 Science & Technology Budding 1,638,000 JMU Subtotal 33~09~00 Central VirgWa Community Colege Technology Center Manufacaain 3,S~Ob,000 Jamestown-Yorlatown Foundation Jonestown Settlement Phase I 2,320,100 g DanvIDe Community Colege ' Yodctown Victory Center J YF Subtotal 600 3,862, 6,182,700 Resource Center g Germanna Commwiity Coflege 3441,700 ~~,~ ~ flame Renovate Lancaster & Const. F.dtication 5,658,000 Auto Lab Ares Renovation Fr+edericksburgGampus 370,000 5,860,700 Mary Washington College Fice Arts Center Renovation 4,365,800 J. Sergeant Reynolds Community CoOege Repair - Exteirtal Masonry, Downtown 931,500 F'"'`~ Science Budding 7,727,400 Downtown Campus, Phase II 8,032,E MWC Subtotal 12,093,2W Lord Fah-faz Community College Resources Center in I 3,~>~ • Medical College o[ Vh^giriia Williams/West Hospital Renovations D A 2,457,700 .eam g Mountain Empire Community Coflege . . Norfolk State University ltemvate Woods Science Building 1,693,490 Godwin Hall Renovation Classroom Facilities 457,900 4,572,000 Lbrary Addition 6,045,800 New River Community Coflege i 000 457 Lechue Hall NSU Subtotal 7,914,300 15,653,500 on Ldarary Expans Btisiness ~ o ~ g , 3,819,500 Old Dominion University • ~~, Addition 13,839,700 N V ty CoQege nni C A»aandale Campos, Phase V 5,412,600 Oceanogfaphy & Phys. Science, Phase I 14,967,000 Constr. Manassas Campus, Phase II 4,906,900 Renovate Health 8c PE Bur7dmg ~ 3,327,500 1,050,000 Paul D. Camp Community Coflege Construction of OceupationaUTechnology ODU Subtotal _ 33,184,200 Bolding, Suffolk 3,085,900 Corrtirated CO~d ~-9 Patrick Henry Community Copege Ph>Ypoa Technical Center 2,538 000 Rappahannock CommuNly College , Renovate Academic 8c Admin. Buildings 2,216 400 Southwest Virginia CommuNty College , Renovate Five Buildings 1 046 800 Statewide ' Maja Mechanical & Heat Pump System II 4,456 900 Tidewater Community Copege , Constr. Va. Beach Campus Ph. IV 3,467 600 Constr. Chesapeake Campus, Ph. II , 2 871 000 Portsmouth Science Bldg. Renovation , , 1,148 000 Thomas Nelson Community Copege , Campus-wide Renovations 1,567 400 ~~nanoe & Receiving Building , 750 000 Virginia Highlands Community College , Constr. - OccJTech. Education Center 2,386 100 Virginia Western Conununky College , Corset. Lab/Continuing Ed. Building 2,898 500 WythevUle Commnnity College , Constr. Addition to Maamtenanoe Building 138,000 VCCS Subtotal Virginia Institute of Marine Science 7569,700 Toxicology/Pathology Fact7ity 8,510 500 Virginia Military Institute , Baaacks - Phase V 3,371 800 Preston Iabrary Renovations , 4,421 500 Maury, Brooke, Richardson Halls Renov. , 2,385,800 VMI Subtotal Virginia PolytechNc Institute 10,179,100 and State University Lrbrary Storage Facility 2,598,900 ~At~ttecaae Veterinary Medicine, Phase IV 17,444,000 8,351 300 Chiller Capacity ~atuion Major Williams hall Conversion , 2,574,100 5,860 800 ~ , FResearch Labors ~' Phase II 2,076 400 Biotechnolo Infill ~ , ~ /PIBcSiJ Subtotal Virginia State University 43;~~0 0 Renovate Virginia Hall Conctrttction of Music Building 3,440,000 4 045 600 Physical Plant Complex 3,914,400 Business School Addition (Singleton Hall) Campus Enviroruirertt Improvement 1,369,300 3,090,000 VSU Subtotal 15,859,300 Total 5472,406,000 MENTAL HEALTH BOND PROJECTS Catawba Hospital Patient Activity Building 51,818,000 Life Safety Improvements 1495 000 Contiraied Central State Hospital Forensic Building Improvements DeJarnette Center New Psychiatric Hospital for Children Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute 60-Bed Addition and Improvements Piedmont GerlaMc Hospital Life Safety Lnprovements Statewide New Food Service System Total 7 712 000 ' 7,171,000 6 111 000 ' 2 771 000 ' 18 095 000 545,173,000 NATURAL RESOURCES BOND PROJECTS Hungry Mother and Seashore State Parks . Const, ofMaintarance Facilities Hungry Mother and Doathat State Parks 5 497,000 Dam Improvements 5,173 000 Hungry Mother State Park and Hemlock , Haves Conference Ctr. . Const. of Dining Facilities 1 182 000 Lake Anna State Park ' Cont. of Office 152 000 Leesylvania State Park , Coast. of Recreational Facilities 3,620 000 Natural Tunnd State park and Caledon , Natural Area Caatst. ofExlu'bits 271 000 Natural Tunnd State Park , Const. of Walkways & Overlook Areas 237,000 Const of Conference & Education Center 2,715 000 Occoneechee State Park , Canst. of Otlice & Vistor Center 587 000 Pocahontas State Park , trnprnvemenLs to Facilities 7,567,000 Smith Mountain Lake Environmental Ed. Ctr. Improvements to Visitor Center 203 000 Statewide , Handicapped Access 1,215 000 Employee Residences , 996 000 ~°vements ~ U~Y Systen>s , 11,564 000 Improvements to Recreational Uses , 15,300 000 Improvements to Natuual Areas , 615 000 Improvement, to Cabins , 2,468 000 Acgtsition of Land for Parks , 26,450,000 Acquisition of Land for Natural Auras 11,475 000 Coast. Campgrounds, Utr7ities & Paving , 1,963 000 Staaatoa River State Park , Pool 950 000 VNeslmoreland State P , Coast, of Cabins 165,000 Total ~~~~ . L-! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE PASSAGE OF STATE REFERENDA ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, BALLOT, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Virginia's continued economic growth and development is dependent upon the Commonwealth's ability to provide for the needs of its citizens both now and into the 21st century; and WHEREAS, voters will have the opportunity to approve three bond referenda on November 3 that will provide funds to construct and renovate the facilities necessary to serve the state's growing population; and WHEREAS, $472.4 million is earmarked for the capital needs of higher education, providing badly needed classroom, laboratory and other teaching space, correction of life-safety code deficiencies, repairs to libraries, additions to computer centers, and other needs; and WHEREAS, $45.2 million is appropriated for the construction and renovation of seven high-priority projects for current and projected patient needs, particularly for children and elderly Virginians, enabling Virginia to meet legal mandates, and ensuring that state facilities will continue to receive Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements; and WHEREAS, $95.4 million is allocated to upgrade existing park facilities and purchase new land, enhancing Virginia's tourist potential and increasing the flow of out-of-state revenue to z-9 Virginia; and WHEREAS, passage of these three referenda will not jeopardize Virginia's AAA bond rating; taxes will not have to be raised; and passage will create 3,600 new jobs and generate $22 million in new revenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, endorses the passage of all three referenda on the November 3, 1992, ballot, authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors encourages the voters of Virginia to vote "YES" on each Question of whether the referendum should take effect. A-92292-9.j ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -IO AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Elementary P.T.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Cave Spring Elementary P.T.A. has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on October 10, 1992. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application from Cave Spring Elementary P.T.A. for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. llen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File .~ -/G~ ,~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that. may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sect. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sea. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT BINGO GAMES 1 G Name of Organization _ ~Z~~t~ ~~~~.rr~;,~~.;., ~~_, E {,':v~r,,~~,~.,_' ~; ~~; ~~ ~ ~- Street Address ~~-{-j}'-~ ~~i r~u ~%~,,_; rJi r~~-t-y ~. J ~-) Mailing Address ~~ ~z_.,,-,...sa--.- `--_7 City, State, Zip Code ~ (~ Q „~ ~ k ~ , (?,._ ~ ~~-1:~ ~~ Purpose and Type`` of Organization ~~~ i~. 5t'~inno ~~ 1x°- ~~ t I ~-G l,~'1 ~ ~5 S 0 C' When was the organization founded? ~ ~i l~ I Roanoke County meeting place? 5 ' Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES / NO Is the organization non-profit? YES_~ NO Federal Identification Number j 1-} - ~ ~, (~ '~ ~ ~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. Officers of the Organization: President: ~~,~~ ~~}-~ L ~~ ; ~~-;~ Vice-President ~ Q~ ~mi ~~, Address : ~ b ~ Jt ~Lwr~~a m Address : Co 1.3 t.o ~ta._i r~h4~,', Secretary: ~ t, ~pj _ ~CmCtg Treasurer: ~~.~ } `_rtZu;n~,r Address : (c ~ ~~ ~U,,,,'~y~ h C~.,~r-~ Address : ~ ~ % ~.~ ~ ~ p u C P 5 ~ e~ ~+ ~ c~..an ~ k ~ y c_ ~ '~ ~ i `~ ~~ o,~vt ~ is e V ~, ~ ~ 0 J ~' Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations: Name : ~_ ~,,,(`~ [~~ ~ i l (]. r~ v~ Home Address 5;,2.3 ~ ~~~,n~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~1X" ~ ~~.c~.v~~J k ~- Phone ~~~ - ~ {1 lr I Bus Phone A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing JQ -)~j - ~ ~... Time of Drawing ~ ,Qm BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From~To~_ 2 State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. iG i 3 ' BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State ZIP Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ,~ 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all records required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~..~~, 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of .the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a permit has been issued? 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or Raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ,~~ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke apd only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operations, or conduct of any such game or raffle? ;,t,~ 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke?~ 5 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~ 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its membership to this application form? Q--}._. :.~' 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~ ~_ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues? a If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal operty, or both and identify exempt property. '~ ~ Cam, 17. State the specific t pe and purpose of the organization. T 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ;yt,,~, If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? ~ y (If so, attach copy of registered agent.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? ~ (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description t.0. ~-1 ~. 1ti10`}~ C~- ~~~~n~ i~0~~` ~y L` ~r t b T ~0. C\ ~l ~-~C ('~ ~~ .~~ Fair Market Value a 7~~~~ 5~~~?O ~L7Ci?C3 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of the Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of instant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three. years.) c. A record of the name door prize, regular from the playing of and address of each individual or special Bingo game prize or Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required toµbe filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time a only at such locations and application? understand that instant Bingo may only s regular bingo game is in progress, and at such times as are specified in this 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? to whom a jackpot 7 ' 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are expected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501C Internal Revenue Code Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hundred dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: Name Title Home Address ~~. ~, Subscribed and sworn before me, this ~ : ~ day of t_'.~'. -.19 ,~::~~` in the County/ of ,~,~~ ;-; i, ~~,~ ;_~ _. , Virginia My commission expires: ,, iii .-! ~ 19 fj• ~ .,'~! i.~ ii ~=~f ~i ~r ~/ Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513 8 ~ `l NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~. Date ~- ,j Commis Toner of t e ~ evenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 a-~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 (unaudited) ~ of General ~ 1> Amount Fund Expenditures $4,041,917 5.60$ August 12, 1992 Dixie Caverns Sept. 8, 1992 Cable TV budget Balance as of Sept. 22,1992 (100,000) (21,149) $3,920,768 5.43% Submitted By 1 ~~J~'-CL~'~ ~'~.~ , 1~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund expenditures ($72,151,291). o- a July 14, 1992 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 $ 8,511 (unaudited) Addition to Capital Reserve from 114,760 original 1992-1993 budget Lighting of Green Hill Park Ball Fields 515,000) Balance as of September 22, 1992 108,271 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance {J`.7 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 $ 50,000 July 14, 1992 Information Program for Bond Referendum (18,250) July 28, 1992 Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy (2,000) August 12, 1992 Outside Legal Assistance (10,000) September 8, 1992 Grumman Litigation (229) Balance as of September 22, 1992 19,521 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - August 1992 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,667,151.61 Payroll: 8/14/92 $ 464,724.53 8/28/92 475,678.31 8/31/92 78.01 940,480.85 4,607,632.46 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~~- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens N P .. \ O O ~- O \ O ri+ O O W W U E- 4 ¢ a o i V i c I I I I I I q 1 n rt - ~ - - • '~ In y I 1 7 I N I11 lIl V' OD V1 V1 111 UI l11 ~O UI er o ~ .O o ~O 111 U1 O~ l11 ~O 0 C0. I NOS ~Itl r-lll OD W ~7 0~ .ate ~~ o~ In G` NN ~o y O I > 1 ~ N 111 ~ o ~ N -- 7 c+ N o M~ o ~ N c+ 0 4~ 7 N y\ q ~l r- N ~N DUI ~~ ~N NN N K 1 N ro~ l A I UI F N I y Y N I 7 C N 1 1 y G` 9 I M N o lil tY 00 N N l71 -- r• M N m N trl lri N ~- Ilt o U1 o M M 111 UI >\ y I 0+111 Mc~ NN o.- m111 TM 00~o h f-a0 goo QaD V'N MUl 0 0 i yr- td 1 N~ NaD .ON UI aD Nc+ ~F o0 00 0111 O1~ Imo ~M 7 7 \ .••• I c+ N l!1 I11 •t ~ ~ w o o~ M N ^- M N N o~ ~ o 00 M .o a0 ~ N f '+ 00 N I r- N O+ W M ~-1' --• ~ UI N ~• N M .- C~ N N 7 G~ ~O 00 M M lft nNO y I 77 N r-7 MN ~~O ~ -- O+N ~N 11100 7 G~ ~' 7 L I - ' ~ rW C 1 MN MN ~- r- Q` Q' • U F 7 1 M ~ `~ `~ ¢ ¢ q 1 i V 1 .oN ~7 IA r• NN 7 W W v' No N7 ~ Nm 7OD •-. N CIL I o7 .oo NN T00 07 o.O MoD N--~ o Nr- tll Ul 00 W i N0 I 7OD Nr- MN 7~ No 00N mm c+O+ o MN ^ ^ NCO ~ - •-. ^ I VN O I I oN 77 III 00 ODM oo r•U1 7.o NN N ~O~ --N o ~O i y¢ F I M N 111 111 M M M I!1 N 7 ~- N .- 7 N 7 .O ~J 7 Y >- I 7 M M ~ N N r- N I I E 1 M i • ~ 2 I r F 1 ~W O I N~ 77 ^-•N ODN 7.O Nlll N~ NN 00N 77 O O L I M l11 N o M o .- 00 O N 111 N ~ N OD .0 0 o N l!1 O a0 ~- I4- T I Mo om o~ N~o Inc .OF MO o Mao t-T ~ F f~- I ¢ J= I of ~-7 1117 QOM ~O I~ c+ N~ N~ N 1110 o M M rU Y I I11N M I11M ~M MAO -- -- N ~ MN tf~ o N N CN C 1 N~ M .- N~ N N y r. O 1 ' '~, E U. L I N N y 1 r N N 0 Y I o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o Iro Opo om o0M M U1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a~ O .- O O (-- ~ N 0~ f. ~ ~ o0 00 00 00 00 oUl 00 00 0ll1 No Ut~O oM l!1 i ~ ~ I o0 00 00 00 00 11100 .oo Nlfl oN Imo tllM N^- M lL I (11o to c~ o.o Na0 ~o MM .-N NM M7 No N111 u I 00 00 M 7 UI M N N OO N N O~ N N M m '- ^ ? o ,..~ N 1 I M N M N ~-• ^ r- M L 1 M r- 1" y C L O y y ~ ca a y O N r L E N '9 OL N .-. ~• N y V •.+ y... y yr+ I ¢ o C UI y 3 N C U N N Ul O N lL y O .• C~ y .-+ y x W x N Ill S > +~ N x Y N x y N V y N y I1I > V •O N UI F- N x UI C Y- O y y w N E L •~ •~ 0 F- y 1- ~0 C O O UI lL N L O N V y L ¢ L 4- H y ••+ E lL y y 7 U L to O UI T y 0 T U Y O y rn y Y y •~+ OI ¢ O y Y r Y y ~+ N O~ u. C LL. ~~+ N ~•+ O .~ y ro x L C 7 -~ N J~ N d y O a L N r+ m r U O m y ~-+ y .+ G L L '+ 'O Y u.. ~ O^ Y ro •.+ N• •~ Z r a ++ y y 0 ~ A O -~ L L E N N U U U L O O W J Y U '+ U y d L ••+ 7 O O 'O O ••+ O O !L y L O •'+ U y Y y Y 7 O lL L L y U L fn y J O~ r d UI C J •~ ~ O L C m U Y- O L O Y y J N y ~•+ !A L S a O V V- N 9 O W N Y UI ¢ N N r r y In > O w 1 C O ~ N y N UI L Y y (A V y O W C •.+ C E y ~•+ ~0 7 y l y m L V- F O r. y O C L N r~ N ~D ~c N C ~ J] > U N L L !n r+ UI N E N •~+ O y y y E U N L y y L E O I V- y ~ y C N L C T C N Y x Y x •.+ C y y C> ro •ti U C .. t ~ h t N y y y N O 7 O ~0 O N C N y .-. -~ y L y y 0 y Y a r L tr d a s V CO E F- S H ¢ J IL U IL O: v tr tr Z 3 0 0 1- Q p ! ~ Z o -- M 7 ~ N 7 l11 f`• aD o ~ 7 f`• u, o f 00 0 .~ 0 7 M ~O M ~ ~-f y1NN NN NN MM MM Mgt 7111 t1)v~ ~D t~ OJ O+ 1L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - --- - ----- - -- N I ~ --- - N ~~ 00 o ~ o m 0 0 W W t9 F a a^ N C O m I .~ a ~ O L a ~ I, a \ V M I' C \ ' ro q 0 N W d F U a C O ro L li. a O E 7 fA va C W I N H d Z L O 7 L Y. J ~ a C U d 4) a~ x IL w N w o 0 d 7 V d t U N I h..._`e. _•. it i I i~ c 7 LL ro L d C d U' 0 Z LL 1 c a i III d E r I a7. d I x U O I W C V I W 7 1 ^ R] 1 F- ~b 1 N I 1 1 d i U I C I ro I .. I ro I 00 I t I N d I L I 7 I r I ^ I ~ H I i C >- I d I a I x I W 1 d U I C I ro 1 L I at E 1 7 I U I C I W i N d I L I 7 1 ~ I 1 ~ I C 1 d I al x I w I I +~ I d l O~ I V i 7 1 m 1 I I ----• • o st QQ~~~~O W ~lI1M~No oD0 ~~oo+ ~~.o N 1 •t v ~ .o m o m f'I N ul N a0 N N M N 1f1 N ~T GD N Ifl ^ ~' ~. N N <tM M Nul ~ ~ oc+ NN '. T t11 0 .- ~ N l( Y M a V' a' ~D l11 N o O p to ~ 7 N M~ V' M 00 (I IMT I Q' I V' N ~- N OD 00 Ul M V' M 07 '. N N T o P T N m M M R N N o+ ~ N ~ R' o t p 1+1 ~o o -~ ~ ~ .O 1"1 C{ l ~O OD O p ~O N M N T o .+ - o r- f V M ~ i ~o f~ N OD M o ~ c+ M ~ c0 M~ M o.- ~ N.- N b NN "f ~N o No N- o .- N ~ N .O .o N N N M I at I ~ ul o~ a0 ut to 00 .- N m sr N N GD ~ ~ .- N N N N O~ N N N ~ 00 o CD ~ M ~ '- o .- N OD c0 ` OD m ~ GD .o u1 0 .o aD N N 't m N N M t'I N N 00 N m o0 ~ ~O o .O FI N N m 7 ul aD ~ ~t ~ o oD o N M ut oD v ri o. ~ ui ui ~ ao o+ ri MI N o ~ o .- N GO M~ N M o CO M ~- lii l11 ~ ` N N it v E ro L W L a p J ~+ N f H UI '+ V ~•+ C ro C H w ..~ y i! E U E it ^ V •••~ C C W 4 4- L T O W Z 4- d d •.~ J C7 .•~ O > C r F- ro O L C N ••~ W C9 O d F !n U t+ ~ t+ ¢ cv r ro a ^ I ro L ro a N ^ .+ W Z C ro L N U 4 W O Z ~ •~ O d L W 7 b L U' lL q C ~+ C V U F+ i4 d '+ ++ 7 N C C in •r w -. co ro •~ ~, d o 0 U? ro d 3 ~ •~+ U U a o .+ L o 3 0 ++ O I o ro 0 o C E o w U •~ O Z o L v O •.+ N d ro .+ ~ o y U o E r o W L E LL C W E U L L •~+ iF d .-•~ O ••+ •.+ O C N 0 00 out 00 111N o NM NN NM trN o N N M M I"1 f'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ • . • + • I ~~ ~I ~• 00 M N o~ o m .o M N In ~t .- .- .r .- u1 Th ~M N ~ m .- N N ul O m c+ Op o~ NM N o u v, N b N 7 .- 111 op .-. r- ~a o N ~o -- ul mm ov 00 N o ~ M OD N R N ~ ? N P o M T o N M N T P N r• • I"t ~c .o N m ~ ~ o ~o a0 ~ N N N I In m N G+ 00 O~.O T T 00 ~O In ~ 7 Q ~M ~ ~'C l11 N N UI m N o o tp to f'I ~O G+ ~O M T N OD ~O ` 111 00 ` N OD o N .o M v N 0+ t~ N ap o .- .- 'O C 7 O L (9 W T N •+ rn d C ~a. ... ro '9 fA N d U ro 7 x U ~•+ O .~ > a ad aL 7 N U E d n. •.. c • o cn ^ ro U o C .. o W N d ro 11 N a+ U L 0 7 c• ro w 4- •.. L C dro roa, z E c~ c~ o UI ul o N N M Y d• ~ ~ ~ 00 00 • s • Q~5 ~ N r r- .~ c N N ~ ~ ~ N ~o a0 ~ ~ N ~"4 c~ M u Q ~O M c+ M o0 m cY In N GO 1`l N U N ~ V M In d N DD 0~ 1 P l71 Q ~ N 'O ao to u~ In ~o r to d N N N M N M ~ d U N w Y 4- L O O 3 UI U Y •~ L C •-~ M d a -. v• 7 ro c n. a w 2 r o C o U •~ ~ ..• ~, . o •-+ y a a 7 7 a ur ut o N M l11 UI 0 0 • • ~. N 4~ N o o o \ o m 0 0 W W C9 F- ¢ ¢ ao I i 1 j - - - -- -- - {/,,-~ wJ I i ~ 1 I o ep p. .. ~p N o Op 0p N o 0 0 0 0 0 C a I ~ o .p .o ~ N M o st ~c ~- 0 0 0 0 0 0 d E v I x U O~ I G+ ~ ~ Ul N V ' W C V I W 7 I ^ Ql I H ~ I ~ I U1 I I m N M uo o a0v I I 7u In Mr- 1 0O I or- I M C d l .- M ~o N o q •t Ul M M V U I o N o v o o M Q ' 7 N O U 1 OD M N M N c } 7 o v U 1 0~ m o ap ~ a o o st o .O C 1 ~ F } •+ ro I c+ M N o N v c M U1 } M 'w o N ~- ~ o o Ut a0 4~ ro .. 1 N m N m aD ~ 4 ~O .O N 00 .O .- UI C 00 •~ ro I r- N N ~ ~ V' N~ N ~ o L m I d 1 .- N o O 1 R L d N Ui d m d 1 Ul o M a0 N V ~t M Ut N oD M ¢ \ L I OD M -- U1 !~ 'Q' OD M Ul U1 N U1 V' 7 I ~ ~O ~ o N o 7 0+ N N o f~• o ~ M a+ 1 C\ O 1 00 N NM o ~~ MUl M Mme- W ro 00 ~ F- 1 ~ N to O V ' 7 o C >- I N 7 fU d I N W O_ I d F x I U ¢ W I C ^ d ro U I Ifl U1 N O o L lL C I b N N o 00 c+ J] O ro I t~ ~O t' ~ 7 E L 1 { . 7 N J] I N ~ M U ¢ E I C 7 1 W I U I C 1 +2 W I N F d 2 N LO d I V' , ~M ~ V 00 NMO ~ MOD M 7L L 1 N a+lflq ~- N V ~ ~U1 o NUl •f r 7 1 O Q o q N ~ R a0 N M M N o ..a J y, 1 F ~ ¢ .. I a0 0o N ~O o M Ul N .- 0 00 0 C U ~ I ~- V' M U1 d N C I ~ ~ N d ~•+ d i x U_ d I W x I N W w o O I o N tr N M O+ ~ m o .n o 0 0 0 .- I o M m o~ UI o ~ o ~ m .o v o o M N d ~ w l o M M ~T UI N -- c+ N N o0 aD o 0 o er ~n '+ C d I 7 7 D' I o O O to +7 a ~ o M U1 N v o o UI o+ Z7 U_ V I N T o V' v ~ N N o [6 OD a0 ~ In R 00 M d 7 1 M ~- N M ~- o+ ~t N~ N o t _ W I U ro I -- N 0 0 U) L I Y d C ro •.+ 7 d U1 E C U E r O tJ C 7 ro ro C L o x rn w L d C a • I L Q~ E O r L O C O d C ro O O L O N O N ~+ d •.+ d N •.+ V ro •~+ M d tli 7 C L> ro C C > E O ro •+ L d O O d E C > Q~ N d L •.+ •~+ ^ O O d d UI o d L C N C U N 3 r U r U '+ L L O O . i d O~ C d ro T N C C N d µ d ro •.• E O ~ C d .• v r r v •.. ro d H 4 v- 1 U N 1+ L F+ •.+ V > L ~ ..+ L > ~ U ( 0. UI d ro 4 C x d 0 C V.. O ro •.+ 4 d ' C U d N N O W ~ a 7 d N d v OD > ro ro L O C ~c N U1 E C 7 L •~ L J] L C > U U O L d V C E d 0 •~ ~ T d ro F O L d •~ ro ~8 > C ro O QI d ¢ d U fn U •-. d Q: r r• d •~ d L U C L C •D r fn C 7 O~ a E F d ro •-+ U d r+ .+ C ~ .r, ro n o c ro~ a o d .••~ ro rn ro ro 7 ••+ ro N N L N C d .^~ •~+ W O d O UI ~ •.+ L O L +~ •.. ac •.. N o C a d .+ o .. U •~ 7 ~+ d •~ d ~ Ul U L N C ro 0 > J7 Q N O w C Y O +• C O ro N O .•+ O d 7 E ••+ d d O C W C ^ 0 0 0 0o Ulo 00 oU1 If1o oM ~ ((~~ // 2 7 t} ' U'1 V LII ~ N M V' ~ N M~ W U1 tli ~O ~0 7 NU UY N NN NOD x000 Tm c+T P~G ~c+ c+c ~4 U_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d ~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ R ~ M ~ 9 't r1 ~ q - n ~ ~ ~~ N M o o o \ 0 0+ 0 0 W W c~ I- do i i ~i I i I i V c 1 i 1 I I ___- - _~ ~ 1 I N ca I o d E r I N a 7 . d 1 x U U 1 W C L I W 7 I CI W 1 H W I } 1 N 1 I OD Op C N I M M O U 1 C I r N I lP I11 N '+ 1 • rol ~ ~ c. m I ` a 1 r N o I .o ~ aN a o. c~ a I v v \ t_ 1 to to 7 I v sT V M r 1 I C \ CI I OD 00 N N W V F I ~t 7 o C >- 1 v Q d 1 n N w a 1 to to d F- x I ~ U Q W 1 C Cl d A U I T O~ +LLL. C I 7 b' .a O b I N F E ~ I f 7 to a I to Ift U Q E I l!1 UI 1 C 7 1 M M f W I U 1 C I Z W 1 N F i d Z N -. L O d 1 7 S L I N N r 7 I l!1 !fl ~ J r I U Q ~+ I V Q' C V U I M M d (A C 1 l!1 111 a -~ a, t x ta, d l N N W x I N W 4- o O I M M I V, o+ d ~ r 1 I!1 N .-+ C d I 7 7 O~ I M M ~ lL ~ 1 ~ ~ d 7 1 0 0 t .. 07 I U A I M M y ~ 1 N N d C d C9 0 0 D Z lL J J r Q 0 1- r- o t- 0 z i ^ ~ o- z c~ p. ~ P tL - - A - A -- is 9 -!0 - 0 -,1- -~ ~ ~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ "~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Status of Sewage Treatment Plant Upgrade COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: During the last year, the respective staffs of Botetourt County, City of Salem, City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton and Roanoke County have been engaged in negotiations relative to the upgrade of the Regional Sewage Treatment Plant and major interceptor sewers. Progress has been made and tentative agreement reached for changes to be made in the future sewage treatment agreement between the City of Roanoke and the other municipalities. Negotiations are now at a point as to where the municipalities are discussing the method used to share the approximate 43 million dollar anticipated cost of the upgrade. On behalf of Botetourt County, City of Salem, Town of Vinton, Roanoke County has retained Finkbeiner, Pettis and Strout, Limited to analyze the construction costs and to make recommendations to these municipalities on a fair method of assessing costs. In approximately two months, the consultant's work will be completed to the point that we can sit down and discuss fair cost sharing of the future upgrades with the City of Roanoke. When tentative agreement has been reached between the staffs of the municipalities, this matter will be brought back to the governing bodies for their concurrence prior to writing a final document which will be approved individually by the municipalities using the Regional Sewage Treatment Plant. Due to the sensitive nature of these negotiations, no formal reports will be generated until such time as favorable negotiations between the municipalities has been reached. ~~ SUBMITTED BY: • ~ Clifford , P.E. Utility Dir ctor Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: o-~ ~~ ~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE _ No Eddy _ Johnson Kohinke _ Minnix _ Nickens Yes Abs D-7 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Elmer Hodge DATE: September 22, 1992 RE: Water Treatment Plant Design Review As you are aware, our proposed water treatment facility is being designed by Roanoke County Staff. This has been made possible by the uniqueness of the project, the excellent level of expertise of our Utility Department personnel, and their willingness to spend endless hours of overtime to accomplish the task. As a means of verifying the accuracy of our work, the firm of Hazen and Sawyer was engaged to review the process design concept for the plant. The purpose of the review was to identify any significant problem areas or faulty design decisions. Attached for your information is Hazen and Sawyer's report which enumerates the specific design considerations addressed. In addition to comments on the design, some suggestions have been provided for our consideration. Attached also is Mr. Cliff Craig's response to those suggestions. In summary, the consultants concur with the major design concepts and decisions made by the staff. Tn addition, during their visits, Hazen and Sawyer personnel were highly complimentary of the technical expertise of our Utility Department staff and of the quality of their design. ~IAZEN AND SAWYER Environmental Engineers & Scientists September 9, 1992 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Hazen and Sawyer, F C. 4011 WestChase Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833-7152 Fax: 919 833-1828 o-~ Re: Roanoke County WTP Process Review H&S No. 3277 Dear Mr. Hodge: We have reviewed information available to use concerning the Roanoke County Water Treatment Facilities process design concept. This letter summarizes our findings and recommendations. SCOPE OF SERVICES Roanoke County requested Hazen and Sawyer to review the process design concept for the County Water Treatment Facilities currently under design. The purpose of the review by Hazen and Sawyer was to identify any significant problem areas or faulty process design decisions. The level of effort requested does not include a detailed design check or value engineering services. On August 17, 1992, representatives of Hazen and Sawyer visited the County's pilot plant operation and discussed the water treatment facilities design with the county personnel. We reviewed preliminary design drawings, pilot plant operating data, water quality data and observed a typical backwash cycle for the operating pilot unit. We were furnished with a set of preliminary architectural drawings that are approximately 50 percent complete. Mechanical and equipment layouts were not available for detailed review. Hazen and Sawyer was requested to address the following specific design considerations: 1) Raw Water Supply and 404 Permit Conditions 2) Water Plant Siting Considerations 3) Water Treatment Process Selection 4) Distribution System Operating Gradient New York, NY • Armonk, NY • Upper Saddle River, NJ • Raleigh, NC • Charlotte, NC • Richmond, VA • Hollywood, FL • Boca Raton, FL • Fort Pierce, FL • Jupiter, FL • Miami, FL • Bogota, D.E. Colombia HAZENAND SAWYER Mr. Elmer C. Hodge ~"` September 9, 1992 Page 2 RAW WATER SUPPLY Raw water will be obtained from the Roanoke River and stored in the Spring Hollow Reservoir which is an off-stream reservoir now under construction. When completed, the new reservoir will provide 3.2 billion gallons of raw water storage with an average safe yield of 23 mgd. At full pool, up to 40 feet of head will be available for gravity flow to the water treatment plant. The design concept includes provision for future raw water pumps when system demands increase and seasonal reservoir water levels do not permit gravity flow. The off-stream reservoir concept has several potential advantages with respect to water quality and treatability of the raw water. These advantages include: 1) The capability to avoid weather related turbidity spikes in the Roanoke River by short-term interruptions in pumping from the river. The available detention time in the reservoir should produce a consistently low turbidity raw water for treatment. 2) Accidental spills into the river can be avoided provided that there is adequate notice to allow for interruption of the raw water pumps. 3) The natural tributary drainage area of the reservoir is small and will be largely owned and controlled by the County. Water quality impacts related to development in the watershed are expected to be minimal. The potential for trihalmethane (THM) formation using Roanoke River water appears to be favorably low based on available test data. Once the reservoir is in service, there may be an increase in THM formation potential due to development of algae and increased organic material in the reservoir which does not exist in the Roanoke River. We would not anticipate significant problems relative to THM potential but would recommend careful monitoring during initial reservoir operation until site specific data is available for analysis. It may also be desirable to have the capability to periodically open a gate at the bottom of the reservoir to flush water from the lower level of the reservoir during wet weather conditions. This would tend to reduce buildup of bottom sediments and undesirable organic material near the intake. The plan to locate the outlet of raw water pipe approximately 1,000 ft. beyond the intake tower to gain additional separation between the inlet and outlet will help eliminate dead spots in the reservoir and will provide more effective clarification of the raw water. HAZENAND SAWYER ~~~ Mr. Elmer C. Hodge September 9, 1992 Page 3 A single 36-inch diameter raw water main is proposed to convey raw water from the reservoir to the water treatment plant. Depending upon the final outcome of continuing discussions with the City of Salem, the ultimate design capacity of the water plant will be a 25 mgd (w/o Salem) or 30 mgd (with Salem). At these flow rates, velocities through the single 36-inch pipeline will be as follows: Flow Velocity 25 mgd 5.5 ft/sec 30 mgd 6.6 ft/sec Typically, gravity flow pipelines are designed to operate with velocities in the 3-5 feet per second range. At 25 mgd, the 36-inch diameter pipeline would operate at the upper end of this range. At 30 mgd, we assume the pipeline would be increased to at least 42-inch diameter. Given the gravity flow potential, careful consideration should be given to the sizing of the raw water pipeline to insure that headlosses are minimized. A larger pipeline may be economically justified based on extending the reservoir operating range over which gravity flow is viable. A single raw water pipeline would also tend to limit the operational flexibility and reliability of the system. Parallel pipelines would provide the flexibility to take one line out of service for maintenance or repair without disrupting plant operations. The economic evaluation of gravity flow discussed above could be combined with consideration of the second pipeline. The larger pipeline should be evaluated based on the cost-effectiveness of reducing headlosses and extending gravity flow. Consideration of the second pipeline would be influenced by this same economic evaluation but should also be evaluated in terms of the operational flexibility and reliability that it would provide. The 404 permit for the project includes provisions for a required minimum instream flow to be measured at a new gaging station constructed by the County at Glenvar. As originally conceived, the requirement for stream augmentation would have effectively reduced the safe yield of the reservoir. The County has proposed an innovative approach to satisfying this permit requirement that involves construction of a pump station/intake at Glenvar that pumps water back upstream to the site of the reservoir for release into the river. In this manner, the requirement for augmenting stream flows in the designated section of the river is satisfied without creating a demand on reservoir storage. This approach is extremely beneficial to the County and we certainly endorse the concept. More importantly, we understand that the Corps of Engineers has accepted the proposal as satisfying all permit conditions. WATER PLANT SITING CONSIDERATIONS Previous evaluations by the County considered three sites for the new water treatment plant. These sites are generally referred to as the (1) "West" site, (2) The HAZEN AND SAWYER Mr. Elmer C. Hodge September 9, 1992 Page 4 "Bendix" site, and the (3) "Salem" site. The County Utilities staff evaluated each of the alternatives and has recommended the West site which is located closest to the Spring Hollow Reservoir. We have reviewed the economic comparison conducted by the County and discussed other siting criteria with the County staff. Based on our review, we are satisfied that the West site is the most appropriate location for the new water treatment plant. The primary factors that we judge to favor this selection include the following: 1) The availability of gravity flow to the water treatment plant 2) Substantial energy savings due to gravity flow and the head required for finished water pumping 3) Lower anticipated treatment costs due to the capacity of minimizing raw water turbidity 4) Increased protection from accidental spills or other contamination of the Roanoke River since the river is not utilized to convey raw water to the treatment plant WATER TREATMENT PROCESS The proposed process for the Roanoke County Water Treatment Plant includes addition of chemical oxidants at the raw water reservoir, flash mixing of coagulants at the head of the plant, solids contact upflow clarification, multimedia filtration, granular activated carbon, chlorine disinfection and high service pumping. The Neptune Microfloc Tricon treatment system will provide an important part of the treatment, including the flocculation -clarification stage and filtration. The County is in the initial start-up phase of a pilot plant project designed to demonstrate performance of the Neptune system. The initial operating data is very favorable and it appears that the selected process will be capable of treating Roanoke River water in compliance with current State and USEPA requirements. The pilot unit will serve the dual purpose of demonstrating plant performance and operator training. We understand that the pilot unit will be operated for up to 12 months to satisfy state regulatory requirements. The limited pilot plant data available to date indicates that the filters have consistently produced water with very low turbidity levels (0.04 NTU). Unlike the full scale plant, raw water turbidities have varied over a wide range since there is no reservoir to provide presettling. As a consequence, settled water turbidities off the upflow clarifier have also varied considerably which increases the solids loading onto the filters. While the filters have continued to perform satisfactorily during these events, we would expect the allowable run-time between backwash .cycles to be significantly reduced, which could present operational difficulties under design HAZENAND SAWYER ~~ Mr. Elmer C. Hodge September 9, 1992 Page 5 conditions. We expect the presence of Spring Hollow Reservoir and the presettling that it will provide to greatly diminish this potential problem. The pilot plant presents a very valuable opportunity to develop "hands-on" operator protocols to address various treatment issues that may be encountered during full scale operation. We recommend that the following operational issues be considered at some point during the pilot plant program. 1) Current operation is limited to one shift per day, start/stop, which is the expected operational mode at start-up of the new plant. A backwash cycle is conducted once per day, irrespective of need. At or near design loading conditions, plant operations are expected to be on a 24-hour basis. In this mode, we would expect allowable filter head loss to dictate backwash cycles. In any event, it would be of interest to study filter performance at or near the headloss limit and immediately after the backwash cycle so that appropriate operating protocols can be developed. Continuous operation would also produce data on expected filter run times at design conditions. 2) Plant operation at various through-put rates should be evaluated. While the modular sizing of the plant will promote constant flow rate operation, it may be desirable to vary the flow rate to address future demands. Hazen and Sawyer has also made a general review of the preliminary architectural drawings of the operations building. Based on the review, it appears that the County will have adequate space for the initial and future process units. The following specific comments are offered for your consideration. 1) Because of the air scour feature for both the clarifier and filter units, it will be important to provide adequate building ventilation. During air scour operation large volumes of saturated and potentially corrosive air will be discharged inside the building. To avoid corrosion problems, adequate ventilation should be provided. A good paint system should be specified for all exposed metals in the process and chemical areas. 2) The chemical room appears to be very limited in floor space. Space utilization in the room will be affected by the location of the two doorways in the room. Because of the critical importance of the chemical feed systems, this area should be carefully reviewed. The preliminary drawings do not indicate how or where bulk chemical storage will be provided. 3) The preliminary site plan indicates a single two million gallon circular clearwell reservoir for storing finished water. This volume seems adequate for initial operation but is less than typically provided at a 25 HAZENAND SAWYER ~.~ Mr. Elmer C. Hodge September 9, 1992 Page 6 mgd plant. Multiple clearwells also increase the reliability of the system and allow units to be taken out of service for maintenance or repair. Adequate baffling should be provided in the circular clearwell to effectively use the available volume for chlorine contact. 4) The proposed process includes sludge thickening and dewatering. Ultimate sludge disposal is anticipated to be land fill. Because of the difficulties involved in dewatering water plant chemical sludge, it will be very important to pilot test dewatering equipment as discussed in the County's Concept Design Report dated August, 1991. Current sludge disposal regulation are more stringent with respect to solids concentration prior to disposal. Availability of disposal sites should also be thoroughly evaluated. WATER SERVICE AREA HYDRAULIC GRADIENT The County has established a general water storage working elevation of 1500 feet above sea level. This elevation appears reasonable based upon water use data provided to Hazen and Sawyer by the County. Estimated average daily use data for all the districts within the County's water service area indicate that between 70 to 80 percent of total water usage (based on volume) occurs at or below the 1500 ft elevation. We understand that this service elevation was selected based upon community input, and has been utilized by the County for the last several years. We believe the limit represents a reasonable public policy to address this issue. SUMMARY The success of any water treatment facility design and construction project depends upon a number of key factors, of which process selection is only one. The process selected by the County has been used at other installations throughout the country and is capable of servicing Roanoke County very well. We recommend that the County negotiate a guaranteed equipment price with Neptune Microfloc as soon as possible to protect the County's interest during equipment procurement. Since the design is so closely tied to this particular equipment, the County should take steps to avoid any unexpected price changes during the bidding process. HAZENAND SAWYER Mr. Elmer C. Hodge ~ "° F September 9, 1992 Page 7 Hazen and Sawyer enjoyed the opportunity to serve the County in this matter. If additional information or support services in this matter are desired by the County, please call us. Very truly yours, HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C. 1 Donald L. Cordell, P.E. Vice President DLC/wp o~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Clifford Craig, P.E., Utility Director DATE: September 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Comments on Hazen and Sawyer 9/9/92 Review of Roanoke County WTP Process At your request, I am providing staff comments to the items discussed and recommendations made in the above report. RAW WATER SUPPLY H & S report recommends monitoring of THM potential during initial reservoir operation. Monitoring of THM potential is a State Health Department requirement and will be met. Chlorine dioxide is being used as a pre-oxidant of the raw water to further reduce the production of THM's in the raw water. The treatment process will remove the THM pre-cursors and prevent the production of THM's by final disinfection with chlorine. H & S report recommends flushing of reservoir to reduce sediment buildup. The reservoir withdrawal tower is provided with a gate at elevation 1200 feet for the purpose of flushing light sediment. Flushing of bottom sediment into the river is prohibited by the reservoir operating permit and sediment control regulations. H & S report discusses the sizing of the raw water line between the reservoir and the water treatment plant. During initial design in late 1991, staff evaluated various sizes for the WTP raw water feed line. Both minimum and maximum velocity were considered as well as the cost associated with different sizes of pipe and valves. ,~~" Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Page Two September 16, 1992 A 42 inch water line would cost $300,000 more than a 36 inch water line. A 42 inch water line would have 4.11 feet less headloss than a 36 inch water line. This reduction in headloss would result in a cost savings only when the reservoir level was below 1370 feet and pumping to the WTP is required. The maximum cost savings in electrical cost during a 30 MGD operation is $30 per day for a maximum of 90 days a year. The potential to save $2,700 per year for operations after year 2030 cannot justify the $300,000 expense. Dual raw water pipe lines would provide partial backup if one water line required maintenance. It would also require more maintenance since there would be twice as much water line, fittings and valves. Dual raw water pipe lines would cost approximately $125,000 more than the simple 36 inch water line currently proposed. Staff feels that the overall Roanoke County water systems storage of two days supply will afford adequate water during the time required to perform maintenance on the 36 inch raw water line. Routine cleaning of the water line would be accomplished during periods of low water demand and would not affect the water supply to our customers. The 36 inch pipe line currently proposed provides the most cost effective size for the WTP raw water supply. WATER TREATMENT PRO__CESS Items mentioned by H & S relative to the pilot plant filter operation is included in the operating plan. The pilot plant has operated 24 hours a day, five days per week for the last two weeks. Filter runs are between 60 and 96 hours. The pilot plant includes filter to waste operation which prevents any turbidity spikes immediately after backwash. This data was not available for evaluation in the H & S report. H & S mentions the need for adequate building ventilation. The clarifier flush and air backwash will use up to 2800 CFM of air. This air flow will be for approximately 60 minutes per day. The building ventilation will be designed to handle this quantity of air. H & S mentions the size of the chemical room. The chemical room in the water treatment building provides space for 45 days chemical storage (Health Department Regulations require a minimum of 30 days storage). Space is also provided for proposed chemical feed systems with additional space to add feed systems if required in the future. D-7 Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Page Three September 16, 1992 In addition, a separate chemical feed area is provided in the GAC building for post-treatment addition of fluoride and corrosion control chemicals. Staff has reviewed the space currently provided and feels it to be adequate. H & S mentions the size of two million gallon clearwelL This two million gallon clearwell is used to provide final disinfection detention time and as a wet well for the high service pump station. The pumps will pump into a two million gallon reservoir on the south loop and another two million gallon reservoir on the north loop. This provides six million gallon finished water storage. All three sites provide area for additional storage to be added when needed. H & S mentions sludge dewatering and disposal Sludge disposal is addressed ir_ the Concept Design Report dated August 1991. Staff discussed sludge disposal requirements with the Executive Director of the Regional Landfill Authority last spring. The sludge thickening equipment selected will produce a sludge meeting the solids content requirements for disposal at the new landfill. H & S mentions equipment price guarantee by the manufacturer. Staff discussed this matter with CPC Microfloc in December 1991. I discussed this matter with the President of CPC Microfloc at their facility on September 1, 1992. CPC Microfloc has given price guarantee for their process/equipment for similar purchases by other entities. I am currently working with CPC Microfloc for design modification to include air supply piping in the equipment they would provide. When this design is complete, they will be in a position to give us a price guarantee subject to cost escalation of materials. I think the Hazen and Sawyer review provides an independent opinion that our concept plan does not contain significant problem areas or faulty process design decisions. D-S ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 772-2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Paul Mahone SUBJECT: Norfolk & Western Petition for Correction of Erroneous Tax Assessments DATE: 11 September 1992 On July 27, 1992, Norfolk & Western Railway Company filed an Application for Correction of Erroneous Assessment with the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond for the tax year 1988, and on August 18, 1992, it filed its Application for Correction of Erroneous Assessment for tax year 1989. I filed responses on behalf of the County, generally denying the allegations and requested relief. These requests for refunds are necessitated by the Department of Taxation's revised tax assessments for 1988 and 1989. The revised assessments were triggered by the Virginia Supreme Court decision in an Arlington County case. This decision invalidated the unit method of determining railroad value which the Department of Taxation had been utilizing. Following this decision, the Department reassessed railroad property using the "across the fence" method. The statewide net effect of this change was a significant increase in railroad taxes, primarily in highly-urbanized areas. In approximately 20 jurisdictions, however, this new assessment methodology reduced the assessment of railroad property. Roanoke County is one of the effected localities. The 1988 assessment was reduced from $10,121,732 to $7,844,095. The refund due for 1988 taxes is $26,192.83. The original 1989 assessment was reduced from $9,993,527 to $7,614,651. The refund due for 1989 taxes is $27,357.01. Neither of these refund amounts include interest allowed by statute. Since all of the State and Federal litigation has now ended with a result unfavorable to the railroads (the railroads supported the unit assessment method in the litigation), Norfolk & Western is now seeking a refund of the amounts due it. On August 31, 1992, the Commissioner of the Revenue Wayne Compton, County Assessor John Willey, and I met with representatives of Norfolk & Western in an attempt to resolve this Petition for a Refund without further litigation. This litigation was filed by the railroad to preserve its opportunity for a refund within the statute of limitations. The representatives of the railroad stressed that it did not want to cause the County any financial hardship; however, it has had to pay additional taxes to the victors in the original litigation as a result of the change in assessment methodology. They also indicated that the railroad would be willing to waive any interest due it if this matter could be resolved in a timely fashion. All litigation concerning the assessment methodology has ended. The State Department of Taxation has revised the assessments of railroad property in accordance with the decision of the Court. The revised assessments result in a reduction in Roanoke County. The railroad is legally entitled to the refunds requested. Therefore, staff will administratively process this refund request as it would process any other valid request for a refund. Because of the magnitude of the refund ($53,549.84) I believe that it is important to advise the Board of this refund. Prompt payment of this refund will save the County the assessment of interest on the amount due and further cots and expenses arising from fruitless litigation. I am available to respond to any questions regarding this refund. PMM/sp cc: Elmer Hodge Wayne Compton Fred Anderson John Willey Reta Busher ~~ 2 r ~ ,. MACHINERY & TOOLS/AIR POLLUTION EQUIPMENT TAX COMPARISON ROANORE CITY-SALEM CITY-ROANORE COUNTY CAPITALIZED ASSESSED TAX ROANORE CITY COST VALUATION RATE TAX FIRST YEAR $100,000 $ 60,000 $3.45 $2,070 SECOND YEAR 50,000 1,725 THIRD YEAR 40,000 1,380 FOURTH YEAR 30,000 1,035 THEREAFTER 20,000 690 QUALIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONT ROL EQUIPMENT IS TAX EXEMPT (ONLY ONE COMPANY QUALIFIES). CAPITALIZED ASSESSED TAX SALEM CITY COST VALUATION RATE TAX FIRST YEAR $100,000 $ 70,000 $3.20 $2,240 SECOND YEAR 60,000 1,920 THIRD YEAR 50,000 1,600 FOURTH YEAR 40,000 1,280 FIFTH YEAR 30,000 960 THEREAFTER 20,000 640 QUALIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT IS TAX EXEMPT (ONLY ONE COMPANY QUALIFIES). THE COMPANY FILES THE EQUIPMENT AND THEN THE CITY ADMINISTRATION NOTIFIES THE COMMISSIONER OF THE R EVENUE OF THE EXEMPTION ALLOWED. CAPITALIZED ASSESSED TAX ROANORE COUNTY COST VALUATION RATE TAX FIRST FIVE YRS $100,000 $ 25,000 $3.00 $ 750 SECOND FIVE YRS 20,000 600 THEREAFTER 15,000 450 Item No. ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session for consideration of an ordinance for exempting or partially exempting certified pollution control facilities and equipment from real and/or personal property and/or machinery and tools taxes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~~~ ~ a ~~a~ i `/"x (~.f-c /.,..C'r't-C . ) C~--yc.c..-~-nz _ iG„ .u~''~` .i'~vt ~sQ-c.~<2 ~~4' .~cc~c/.jv~/., BACKGROUND: ~%~~ ~, ~/ ~ y The Board of Supervisors received a request! from a County business inquiring about the feasibility of adopting an ordinance to exempt pollution control equipment from real and personal property taxation. The Code of Virginia, title 58.1-3660, authorizes local governments to "exempt or partially exempt" by ordinance, certified pollution control equipment and facilities. The Air Pollution Control Board and State Water Control Board are the agencies designated to certify applications for tax exemption from business and industry. At the present time, no Roanoke County companies have been certified. The Cities of Roanoke and Salem and Montgomery County have enacted ordinances exempting air pollution control facilities from varying degrees of taxation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The procedure for certification requires the business to request certification in writing from the appropriate state agency. Upon receiving a copy of the certification, Roanoke County would create a classification for certified real estate on their assessment records. Certified personal property would be reported to the Commissioner of the Revenue. The certified property would then be assessed and taxed according to the tax exemption ordinance in effect. Currently, there are eleven companies in Roanoke County that have air pollution control permits (see attachment from the State). Water Pollution Control equipment would constitute both a greater number of companies and potentially more dollar value. The effects and extent of exempting water pollution facilities requires more study. ~-~! Machinery and tools tax rate and method of assessment is less than that of adjacent localities. This situation has been a positive factor in competing with other areas of Virginia for industrial locations. FISCAL IMPACT: Either a full or partial tax exemption would reduce tax revenues to the County. The granting of an exemption for one class opens the door for other requests for exemptions which are authorized in the Code of Virginia. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance that would go into affect on January 1, 1993, that exempts certified air pollution control equipment. Set the initial exemption to be 250 of the original certified value. 2. Continue study of air and water pollution control equipment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance that would go into affect on January 1, 1993, that exempts certified air pollution control equipment. Set the initial exemption to be 25% of the original certified value. Respectfully submitted: Approved: Timothy W. Gub la, Director Elmer C. Hodge Economic Development County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs Attachment :` ~~ f ~. } § 58.1-3660 CODE OF VIRGINIA Resources Coalition, Inc., City of Portsmouth, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.436. Galax Commu- nity Apartments Corporation, City of Galax, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.437. Wytheville Com- munity Apartments Corporation, Town of Wytheville, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.438. Asso- ciation for the Preservation of Civil War Sites, Inc., Spotsylvania County, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.439. Petersburg Community Devel- opment Corporation, City of Petersburg, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.440. Greater Washington Jewish Community Foundation of Virginia, Inc., Fairfax County, (1991, c. ' 377); 58.1-3650.441. Virginia Beach Christian Out- reach Group, Inc., City of Virginia Beach, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.442. American Lung Association, City of Richmond, (1991, c. 377); 58.1-3650.443. The Virginia Beach Founda- tion, City of Virginia Beach, (1991, c. 377). § 58.1-3661'; These organizations have been specifically designated by the General Assembly `~.,ati benevolent, charitable, historical or patriotic organization or public park or playgro~ =;,; within the context of Va. Conat., Art, X, § g (a) ;, (6). In furtherance of the general policy of the ;' Commission to include in the Code only pro~_ '_' sions having general and permanent applica- tion, these sections, which are limited in their ;` purpose and scope, are not set out here, but , attention is called to them by this reference:'. For detailed information regarding any lirnita- tion of the exemption, including effective dates, reference should be made to the Acts, of `< Assembly. Editor's note. -The numbers of many of the sections described in the Code Commission;;;. note above have been assigned by the Virginua '<± Code Commission in order to avoid duplication`'} in numbering of sections. ; ~' s ARTICLE 5. Other Exempt Property. • ~--~ § 58.1-3660. Certified pollution control equipment and facilities. •- A. Certified pollution control equipment and facilities, as defined herein, are, hereby declared to be a separate class of property and shall constitute'._a' classification for local taxation separate from other such classification of real or personal property and such property. The governing body of any county, city or town may, by ordinance, exempt or partially exempt such property, from local taxation. ; ~•_-F ~: B. As used in this section: ~..' _~~. "Certified pollution control equipment and facilities" shall mean~:any; property, including real or personal property, equipment, facilities, or devices used primarily for the purpose of abating or preventing pollution of ~tfie atmosphere or waters of the Commonwealth and which the state certifying. authority having jurisdiction with respect to such property has certified to the' Department of Taxation as having been constructed, reconstructed, erected; or; acquired in conformity with the state program or requirements for abatement or control of water or atmospheric pollution or contamination. ~,~''~:> "State certifying authority" shall mean the State Water Control Board,tfor~, water pollution, and the State Air Pollution Control Board, for air pollutioa,~ and shall include any interstate agency authorized to act in place'+`of{ a certifying authority of the Commonwealth. (Code 1950, § 58-16:3; 1972;' 694; 1984, c. 675.) `'``~'°`j :~; .: Law Review. -For survey of Virginia law ~. ~a on taxation for the year 1971-1972, see 58 Va. ~ ~~~•~`; L. R.ev. 1338 (1972). i § 58.1-3661. Certified solar energy equipment, facilities or devi~ and certified recycling equipment, facilities or devices. - A. Certi solar energy equipment facilities or devices and certified recycling equipme facilities, or devices, as defined herein, are hereby declared to be a sepal' class of property and shall constitute a classification for local tasat separate from other classifications of real or personal property. The govern body of any county, city or town may, by ordinance, exempt or paE 468 >; 1 . ~~ • "~- ~ Revised 1/13/88 EXAMPLE OF LETTER OF APPLICATION CERTIFICATION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT FOR TAX PURPOSES SECTION 58.1-3660 Mr. John M. Daniel, J-r. Assistant Executive Director State Air Pollution Control Board Post Office Box 10089 Richmond, VA 23240 Re: Title 58.1 - Taxation Dear Mr. Daniel: Section 58.1-3660 covers certified pollution control equipment and facilities used primarily for the purpose of abating or preventing pollution of the atmosphere. The following information described an air pollution control facility for which we would like to obtain certification. a ) Name ,r_ddress , aI1C~ Federal I . D . Number (identification with regard to ownership of the facility} (b) Description of Facility (give the functional name of the air pollution control equipment and its purpose -- an attached sketch, drawing or flowsheet may be included and referred ta, as appropriate) (c) Address of Facility Location (the exact location of the air pollution control equipment) (d) Description of the Industrial Operation in ConnPctio_n with Which Such Facility Is Used (a statement which described the pollution problem and row the pollution control facility is related to it) (e) Description cf Effect of Such Facilities in Terns of the Cuantity and Quality of G7aste Removed or Disposed of by Such Facility {give cruantitative data as evidence to demonstrate how the air pollution control equipment is performing a valid emis~ior. co.ritrol function} 2 J ~,' . -~-i Mr. John M. Daniel, Jr. Page 2 Date (f) Date of Construction and Operation of Facilit (give dates of start and completion and initial operation) (g) Profit Derived throucth the Disposal of Waste (indicate value of material recovered and either recycled to process or sold as product. If none, write "None") (h) Cost of Pollution Control Facilities Please send us a copy of the information you forward to the State Taxation Department. Sincerely, (to be signed by responsible company officer) 3 TABLE 3 Counties and Cities in Virginia That Have Enacted Ordinances Exempting or Partially Exempting Certified Pollution Control Facilities and Equipment From Real and/or Personal Property Taxes (Calendar Year 1991 or Fiscal Year 1991-92) County City Alleghany Bedford Amherst Danville Campbell Fredericksburg Chesterfield Hampton Dinwiddie Hopewell Franklin Newport News Frederick Norfolk Giles Petersburg Grayson Portsmouth Henrico Richmond Henry Roanoke Isle of Wight Waynesboro King William Winchester Montgomery Salem Orange Shenandoah Spotsylvania Washington York Source: Tn July 1991, the Virginia Department of Economic Development sent a taz questionnaire to the Commissioner of the Revenue, Director of Finance, or Supervisor of Assessments in each county and city in the State. Their comments on whether or not such an ordinance has been enacted in their localities are summarized in this table. p.,.. ,~' °p ,~ a'V~Q --~_ i SUMMARY OF SELECTED LOCAL TAX RATES ~` Real Personal Machinery Utility Estate Property & Tool' t%> Botetourt S0.75 S 1.80 S 1.206 20 (E) Craig County 50.70 S2.20 Franklin County S0.50 S1.67 50.54-.22 20 (E,T) Roanoke City S 1.25 S3.45 52.07-.69 12" Roanoke County S1.13 53.50 50.75-.45 12 (E,G,T,1M Salem S 1.00 53.20 S2.24-.80 6 Vinton S l .l 8 54.50 S 1.00-.60 12 (E,G,T,~M 'Effective Tax Rate=Assessment Ratio x Nominal Tax Rate. All figures calculated per S 100 assessed value. 'Value for tax purposes depends on year of purchase. E=electricity: G=natural gas: T=telephone: W=Water. All others Include sewer. Utility tax ceilings vary by Jurisdiction. "Cap of S2,000 per meter, per month. 5 ROANOKE VALLEY OI= VIR<;tNl~ 111 Franklin Plaza~Suitc 333ARnanoke. ~'~ 244111-40t)-L~)C:~TF-?~7(1>-;~i-I»~`A! '~` ,~~ ~~~i'~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-10 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, excluding the pending litigation issue, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Kohinke A COPY TESTE: ~7'") ~~- ~Cf Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~""" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 13, OFFENSES-MISCELLANEOUS, BY ADDING ARTICLE II, NOISE, AND BY DELETING SECTION 13-3, NOISE, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: O ~ a~~G~`tt-~r-c~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• A noise ordinance parallelling ones recently adopted by the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton is presented for Board approval. BACKGROUND• At the request of the Board of Supervisors, the Public Safety Team and the County Attorney's Office have expended a considerable amount of time developing a noise ordinance which is similar to those of adjoining jurisdictions. Because of concerns about the enforceability of such an ordinance, the Public Safety Team has taken no specific position on this ordinance but has attempted to develop the clearest and most enforceable ordinance possible for the citizens of the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The ordinance prescribes both specific acts which are declared "noise disturbances" under Sec. 13-21 as well as a general prohibition against "noise disturbance" under Sec. 13-20. A "noise disturbance" is defined in Sec. 13-18 as encompassing three categories of sound, as follows: (1) sound which endangers or injures the safety or health of any person; (2) sound which annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities; or (3) sound which endangers or injures personal or real property. A violation of either the specific or general "noise disturbance" prohibitions would constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor punishable by a maximum fine of $2,500.00 or by confinement in jail for not more than 12 months, or by both such fine and confinement, under Sec. 1-10. S-1 The ordinance provides for certain exceptions to the applica- tion of its prohibitions including: (a) work required by a governmental emergency and notification related to such work; (b) school or county sponsored sports or recreational events; (c) music, chimes or sounds from a place of worship; (d) sounds coming from a county or state authorized activity up until 10:00 p.m.; and (e) sounds generated within commercial or industrial zoning districts. In addition, a procedure is detailed in Sec. 13-23 for applying to the Board of Supervisors for a waiver, not to exceed one year, from the prohibitions of this ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed noise ordinance. Respectfully submitted, J eph ~ObensTiain S for A sistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 2 S-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 13, OFFENSES-MISCELLANEOUS, BY ADDING ARTICLE II, NOISE, AND BY DELETING SEC. 13-3, NOISE. WHEREAS, excessive noise can be detrimental to the health and welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County and can degrade the quality of life which the citizens of this County seek to enjoy; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance occurred on September 22, 1992, and the second reading of this ordinance occurred on October 27, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous" be amended and reenacted by the addition of Article II, "Noise" as follows: Sec. 13-16. Short Title. This Article shall be known as the "Noise Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, Virginia." Sec. 13-17. Declaration of Policy. It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the County of Roanoke to promote an environment for its citizens free from excessive noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare or degrades the quality of life within Roanoke County. Sec. 13-18. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this Article shall have the meaning assigned to them in this section. S-I Emergency work shall mean work made necessary to restore property, public or private, to a safe condition following a state of emergency or a local emergency as defined by the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973, Chapter 3.2 of Title 44 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or its successor, or work required to protect persons or property from immediate exposure to danger, including work performed by the Roanoke County Utility Department or by public service companies when emergency inspection, repair of facilities or restoration of services is required for the immediate health, safety or welfare of the community. Motor vehicle shall mean a self-propelled vehicle including passenger cars, trucks, truck-trailers, semitrailers, campers, racing vehicles, and any motorcycles (including, but not limited to, motor scooters, mini-bikes, all-terrain vehicles and three- wheelers) as defined in § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia. Noise disturbance means any sound which (a) endangers or injures the safety or health of any person; (b) annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities; or (c) endangers or injures personal or real property. Person shall mean any individual, corporation, cooperative, partnership, firm, association, trust, estate, private institution, group, agency or any legal successor, representative, agent or agency thereof. 2 ~'" Sec. 13-19. Exceptions from this Article. The provisions of this Article shall not apply to: (1) The emission of sound for the purpose of alerting persons to the existence of an emergency or to the emission of sound in the performance of emergency work; (2) Music, bells, chimes or other sounds which are emanating from a church, temple, synagogue or other place of worship; (3) Sound generated from school or County sponsored athletic or recreational events; (4) Sound generated by activities which are an official or approved part of any County or State approved or licensed festival or activity, provided such exemption shall terminate at 10:00 p.m.; (5) Sound generated in commercial and industrial zoning districts which are necessary and incidental to the uses permitted therein; and (6) Sound for which a variance has been granted in accordance with Sec. 13-23 of this Article. Sec. 13-20. General Prohibition. In addition to the specific prohibitions contained in this Article, no person shall make, continue, permit, or cause to be made, continued or permitted any noise disturbance within the County. Sec. 13-21. Specific Acts as Noise Disturbances. The following acts are declared to be noise disturbances in violation of this Article. The acts so specified shall not be 3 S.. I deemed to be an exclusive enumeration of those acts which may constitute a noise disturbance under Sec. 13-20 and provided that the acts so specified below may still constitute a noise disturbance under Sec. 13-20 independently of the hours of the day such acts take place. (1) Engaging in, or operating or causing to be operated any equipment used in the construction, repair, alteration or demolition of buildings, streets, roads, alleys or appurtenances thereto between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day. (2) Repairing, rebuilding or modifying any motor vehicle or other mechanical equipment or device between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day in a manner so as to be plainly audible across property boundaries. (3) Loading or unloading trucks outdoors within 100 yards of a residence between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day. (4) Sounding the horn or warning device of a vehicle, except when necessary as a warning during the operation of the vehicle. (5) Operating or permitting the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, television, phonograph or any other device for the production of sound, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day, at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible across property boundaries or through partitions common to two residences 4 `~ within a building or plainly audible at 50 feet from such device. (6) Using or operating a loudspeaker or other sound amplifi- cation devices in a fixed or movable position exterior to any building, or mounted upon any motor vehicle or mounted in the interior of a building with the intent of providing service to an exterior area for the purpose of commercial advertising, giving instruction, information, directions, talks, addresses, lectures, or providing entertainment to any persons or assemblage of persons on any private or public property, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day. (7) Using or operating any motor vehicle without factory installed mufflers or their equivalent, on any public street or road in the county or on private property within a residential zoning district. (8) Using a radio receiving set, an audio cassette player, a compact disc player, or other device for the production of sound in a motor vehicle at a volume sufficient to be plainly audible at 50 feet from such vehicle. (9) Failure to deactivate an alarm system plainly audible at 50 feet from such alarm within such reasonable time as is established by Sec 16-23 of this Code. Sec. 13-22. Penalties. A violation of any provision of this Article shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each separate act on the part of the person 5 S- I violating this Article shall be deemed a separate offense, and each day a violation is permitted to continue unabated shall constitute a separate offense. Sec. 13-23. IIndue Hardship Waiver. (a) Any person responsible for a noise source may apply to the Board of Supervisors for a waiver, or partial waiver, from the provisions of this Article. The Board of Supervisors may grant such waiver, or partial waiver, upon a finding that either of the following circumstances exists: (1) The noise does not endanger the public health, safety or welfare; or (2) Compliance with the provisions of this Article from which a waiver is sought would produce serious economic hardship without producing substantial benefit to the public. (b) In determining whether to grant such waiver, the Board of Supervisors shall consider the time of day the noise will occur, the duration of the noise, whether the noise is intermittent or continuous, its extensiveness, the technical and economic feasibility of bringing the noise into conformance with this Article and such other matters as are reasonably related to the impact of the noise on the health, safety and welfare of the community and the degree of hardship which may result from the enforcement of the provisions of this Article. (c) No waiver, or partial waiver, issued pursuant to this Article shall be granted for a period to exceed one year, but any such waiver, or partial waiver may be renewed for successive like 6 periods if the Board of Supervisors shall find such renewal is justified after again applying the standards set forth in this Article. No renewal shall be granted except upon written application therefor. 2. That Sec. 13-3. "Noise" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby repealed. 3. That this Ordinance shall be in effect from and after November 1, 1992. c:\wp50\agenda\noise.ord 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION 92292-11 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $1,830,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $1,830,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. The County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, on September 22, 1992 on the issuance of such bonds in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code"). The School Board of the County has requested by resolution, the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,830,000 ("Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1992"; shall bear interest payable from the date of delivery thereof semi-annually on each June 15 and December 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning June 15, 1993, or such other date as VPSA may establish, at the rate or rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on December 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rate or rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that no such interest rate shall be more than ten one- hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the annual rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding maturity of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA ("VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that no interest rate on the Bonds shall exceed nine percent (9%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed $1,830,000 and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than December 15, 2014. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. 6. Payment• Payina Aaent and Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption; (b) All overdue payments of principal or interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds; and (c) '~ Richmond, Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar ~arid'~~~~~~ayrig"~~Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds coming due on or before December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before December 15, 2002, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds coming due after December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after December 15, 2002, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after December 15, 2002, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices December 15, 2002 to December 14, 2003, inclusive..... 103% December 15, 2003 to December 14, 2004, inclusive..... 102 December 15, 2004 to December 14, 2005, inclusive..... 101 December 15, 2005 and thereafter ...................... 100; Provided, however, that while the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the VPSA. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than thirty (30) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate and amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County -3- to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate; Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and that the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein. Furthermore, the Board covenants on behalf of the County that the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the Treasurer of the County to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, Public Financial Management, Inc., as investment manager, and Central Fidelity Bank, as depository. 12. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. -4- On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution with Crestar Bank designated as Bond Registrar, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Kohinke The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on September 22, 1992, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 22nd day of September, 1992. y»~, ~. CL,GC.c~~ Mary H. 1~llen, Clerk Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (SEAL) cc: File Bond Counsel Circuit Court Judge Ruth Wade, Clerk to the School Board Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney -5- Exhibit A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) NO. TR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1992 The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of ($ Dollars ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on December 15, and annually on December 15 thereafter to and including December 15, (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi- annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year commencing on (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Richmond, Virginia, as bond registrar ("Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1-227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax -2- upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. This Bond is registered in the name of Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the -3- surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before December 15, 2002, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after December 15, 2002, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after December 15, 2002, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices December 15, 2002 to December 14, 2003, inclusive...... 103% December 15, 2003 to December 14, 2004, inclusive...... 102 December 15, 2004 to December 14, 2005, inclusive...... 101 December 15, 2005 and thereafter ....................... 100; Provided, however, that while the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond or of the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged, the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities without first obtaining the written consent of the -4- Virginia Public School Authority. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than thirty (30) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated . 1992. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: By Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Virginia -5- ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, transfers unto the undersigned sells, assigns and (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) W: \VSA\~1NK\16.RS3 September 22, 1992 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on September 22, 1992, the following persons were present or absent as shown: PRFSINT ABS]TTI' Upon motion by _______________, seconded by ________________, the following resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by the following roll call vote, as recorded in the minutes of the meeting: NII~B112 -2- ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Issuance of not to exceed $1,830,000 General Obligation School Bonds to be sold to the Virginia Public School Authority. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: d~z-~-' ~~``~'~`~~ BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke has made application to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) for the issuance of not to exceed $1,830,000 in general obligation bonds as part of the 1992 Fall bond sale of the VPSA. The projects that are included in these bonds are as follows: Roof replacements $ 500,000 Cave Spring Junior site improvements 75,000 Mason's Cove Elementary sewage system 75,000 Green Valley Elementary renovations and kindergarten rooms 1,060,000 Improvements for Americans with Disabilities Act 50,000 1,760,000 Bond issuance cost (estimated) 70,000 Total VPSA Bond Issue 1,830,000 SUMMARY: As part of the application process, the County needs to have a public hearing at this time on the issuance of these bonds. In addition, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors needs to adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the issuance of these bonds and outlining certain terms and conditions. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds to pay for the current year debt service on these bonds have been included in the 1992-1993 budget. Future debt payments will be included in future schools budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends holding a public hearing on the issuance of these bonds. At the conclusion of this public hearing, the attached resolution should be adopted. 7-1 Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Q Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Approved by, ~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens -7 = i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $1,830,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $1,830,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. The County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, on September 22, 1992 on the issuance of such bonds in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code"). The School Board of the County has requested by resolution, the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,830,000 ("Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1992"; shall bear interest payable from the date of delivery 7~ thereof semi-annually on each June 15 and December 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning June 15, 1993, or such other date as VPSA may establish, at the rate or rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on December 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rate or rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that no such interest rate shall be more than ten one- hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the annual rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding maturity of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA ("VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that no interest rate on the Bonds shall exceed nine percent (9~) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed $1,830,000 and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than December 15, 2014. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. 6. Payment; Payina Aaent and Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption; (b) All overdue payments of principal or interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds; and 7- (c) Richmond, Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds coming due on or before December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before December 15, 2002, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds coming due after December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after December 15, 2002, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after December 15, 2002, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices December 15, 2002 to December 14, 2003, inclusive..... 103 December 15, 2003 to December 14, 2004, inclusive..... 102 December 15, 2004 to December 14, 2005, inclusive..... 101 December 15, 2005 and thereafter ...................... 100; Provided, however, that while the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the VPSA. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than thirty (30) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate and amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County -3- 7 to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate; Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and that the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein. Furthermore, the Board covenants on behalf of the County that the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Proaram; Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the Treasurer of the County to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, Public Financial Management, Inc., as investment manager, and Central Fidelity Bank, as depository. 12. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. -4- Ti The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on September 22, 1992, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 22nd day of September, 1992. Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (SEAL) -5- T- NO. TR-1 Exhibit A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1992 fi The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Dollars ($ ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on December 15, and annually on December 15 thereafter to and including December 15, (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi- annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year commencing on (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. l For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Richmond, Virginia, as bond registrar ("Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1-227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax -2- -~ upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. This Bond is registered in the name of Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the -3- i -t surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before December 15, 2002, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after December 15, 2002, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after December 15, 2002, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after December 15, 2002, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices December 15, 2002 to December 14, 2003, inclusive...... 103 December 15, 2003 to December 14, 2004, inclusive...... 102 December 15, 2004 to December 14, 2005, inclusive...... 101 December 15, 2005 and thereafter ....................... 100; Provided, however, that while the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond or of the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged, the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities without first obtaining the written consent of the -4- 7=f Virginia Public School Authority. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than thirty (30) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated 1992. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: By Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Virginia -5- ~~~ ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) W:\VSA\ROANK\ROANKI6.RS3 ~,...~," .. September 22, 1992 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on September 22, 1992, the following persons were present or absent as shown: PRESENT: ABSENT: Upon motion by seconded by , the following resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by the following roll call vote, as recorded in the minutes of the meeting: MEMBER VOTE -2- ~l.~l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE 92292-12 TO ELIMINATE PROFFERED EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 12.26-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (ROUTE 117) APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH CENTURION ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, WITH ONE CONDITION, UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 22, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 1, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from M-1, Light Manufacturing, and A-1, Agriculture, to B-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, in August of 1987. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 12.26-acres, as described herein, and located on the north side of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) approximately 50 feet west of its intersection with Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, with 1 conditions to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, with one condition. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bank, National Association. 3. That the Petitioner, Dominion Bank, National Association, now requests elimination of the following proffered conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in August of 1987, and that the following proffered conditions are hereby rescinded: (a) That the property will be utilized in substantial conformity with the development plan prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, under date of July 6, 1987, with the exception that there will only be two entrances to said property. (b) That the showroom to be constructed will be a two-story structure. (c) That all lighting will be shielded away from adjoining properties and will be directed solely upon the subject property. (d) That one entrance shall be aligned with a cut in Peters Creek Road, either at the existing location or at a new location, should the present location be moved. (e) That all drainage, screening and buffering shall be in accordance with the Roanoke County Ordinance. (f) That there will only be two signs on the property which are not attached to structures. The signs will be in substantial conformity with the design attached hereto. 4. That the Petitioner, Dominion Bank, National Association, now voluntarily agrees to the following proffered condition: (a) That the existing buildings on the property shall be demolished and removed to an approved disposal site within 180 days of the approval of the petition to rezone the subject property. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 2 Parcel 1 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Peters Creek Road and at the southeasterly corner of the property of Maury L. Strauss, et als. (DB 1244, page 1352); thence with a curve to the right along Peters Creek Road having a chord bearing and distance of S. 60 deg. 47' 54" W. 832.07 feet, an arc distance of 833.79 feet to a concrete monument; thence leaving said Peters Creek Road N. 28 deg. 39' 30" W. 875.61 feet to a pin set at the southerly corner of the property of William H. Craft (DB 1186, page 432); thence along the property line of the said William H. Craft N. 60 deg. 25' E. 331.34 feet to an old pin located on the southeasterly property line of Howard B. Fitzgerald, Jr. (DB 1117, page 784); thence S. 37 deg. 27' E. 676.37 feet to a large bolt at the southerly corner of the property of Maury L. Strauss, et als. (DB 1177, page 751); thence N. 55 deg. 48' E. 275.20 feet to a pin located at the approximate center of Lot 1, Block 1, Century Estates; thence along the southerly property line of Lot 1, Block 1, Century Estates and the property of Maury Strauss, et als., (DB 1244, page 1352) S. 56 deg. 45' 21" E. 262.11 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING, and containing 9.967 acres situate on Peters Creek Road (Route 117) as shown on a topographic survey for Eugene Lynn by T. P. Parker & Son, dated April 8, 1987. Parcel 2 BEGINNING at a point on the northwest corner of Lot 21, Block 2, Plat of Century Estates of record in Plat Book 9, page 282 of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence S. 35 deg. 45' E. 104.50 feet to a pin set at the southwest corner of said Lot 21, Block 2, Century Estates; thence along the southerly property line of said Lot 21, Block 2, Century Estates, N. 54 deg. 15' E. 15.91 feet to a pin set; thence leaving Lot 21 and along the westerly side of Centurion Road, NW, S. 35 deg. 53' 50" E. 79.92 feet to a pin set on the northerly corner of Lot 2, Block 2, Map of Century Estates; thence leaving Centurion Road and with a curve to the left having a chord bearing and distance of N. 80 deg. 49' 25" W. 42.37 feet, an arc distance of 47.05 feet to a point on the northerly property line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Century Estates; thence along same S. 54 deg. 15' W. 103.71 feet to an old pin set at the westerly corner of said Lot 2, Block 1, Century Estates; thence with the westerly line of the aforesaid Lot 2 and 1, Block 1, Map of Century Estates, S. 35 deg. 53' S0" E. 114.48 feet to an old pin; thence S. 56 deg. 45' 21" E. 9.14 feet to an old bolt set; thence S. 55 deg. 48' W. 275.20 feet to a large bolt along the northerly line of a 9.967 acre tract of Royal Buick Company; thence N. 37 deg. 27' W. 270.03 feet along the easterly line of the same Royal Buick Company tract to a pin set on the southerly corner of property of Ellis E. & Lena D. Cullen (DB 750, page 298); thence along the said Cullen property N. 54 deg. 13' 39" E. 397.13 feet to the point and 3 place of BEGINNING and containing 2.171 acres as shown on survey for Royal Buick Company showing a 9.967 acre tract, an acre stormwater management easement, a 20' drainage easement, and a 20' waterline easement made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd. dated December 13, 1988. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Kohinke A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 4 =~Lf 1 i AY~ - JV 1 _'1-11 I _~r L'~ hJ~.'L I ~J-f°.1._'1--II 7~_~Y'+.L 0.'111;11 f~,. ;". i, +11;i1 ~'. ~ (, ;'~•c 11 ;~! . fi f' U, fi,,t 1? 121;"~i~l.+', 1'i~'i'`:!ip :dfr•!,i 703--553--'7$91 September 16,1992 ~~ ~~ ~ Scot ~`7 r FCC/ '~" Mr. Terrance Harrington v~~>~j~! r planning Director BANKSHARES Roanoke County Department of rila.nning P.O. Sox 29$00 Raanoke,va. 24018 Re: Fte2oning Petition by Dominion Bankshares of the Royal Buick Property consisting o~ Tax Map Nos. 37.0$-1-6 and 8 {Rozar-ing File No. 17~-9/92) . Dear Mr. Harrington: In response to the staff and Planning Commission's concern with the existing buildings on the above mentioned property, we have consulted with the contract purchaser of the property and voluntarily agree to the following proffered condition: The existing buildings on the property sha11 be demolished and removed to an approved disposal site within 180 days of the approval of the petition to reaone the subject property. If you have any questions regarding this matter, dc~ not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ ~~ ~ - - Alaric G. Iieinema n Assistant V~.ce Pres~.dent __ -- pdst•tt"" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 w of pages GC-i PE"ITI'IONER: DOMINION BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION CASE NUMBER: 17-9/92 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 1, 1992 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 22, 1992 A. REQUEST Petition of Dominion Bank, National Association to eliminate conditions on an approximate 12 acre parcel zoned B-2 conditional, located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 50 feet west of its intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Bill Craft who owns properly behind the site informed the Commission that the paved road off of Peters Creek Road is his own private road and as long as he maintains it, the road will remain private. Kyle Fitzgerald wanted to know if sewer service will be extended. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission discussed the possibility of removing the buildings from the site. Staff indicated they would work with petitioner to address this issue prior to the Board of Supervisors' meeting. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition and asked that staff work with the petitioner and relay to the Board their concern about removal of the existing buildings. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Massey Mr. Massey announced that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting on this petition due to a potential conflict of interest. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan ,_ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Hartley, Alternate Secretary oanoke County Planning Commission STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER• 17-9/92 PETITIONER: Dominion Bank REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: August 28, 1992 Request of Dominion Bank, National Association, to eliminate proffered conditions on an approximate 12 acre parcel zoned B-2 with conditions, and located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 50 feet west of its intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. The subject property was originally rezoned from M-1, Light Manufacturing, and A-1, Agriculture, to B-2 with conditions in August 1987 by Royal Buick Company for a new automobile dealership. The conditions proffered at that time consisted of substantial conformity with a concept plan, limitation on height to two stories, and proffers dealing with lighting, signage, and the location and number of entrances (see attached listing of proffers). b. Dominion Bank has obtained the property and now wishes to have the conditions removed to aide in marketing this property. c. .The property includes in excess of 800 feet of frontage on Rt. 117, and is one of the few larger parcels remaining in this section of the Rt. 117 corridor. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2, General Commercial District, permits a wide variety of office, commercial and retail uses, including new auto dealerships, shopping centers, fast food restaurants, convenience stores, and most other retail uses. Under the new zoning provisions some of these uses would be permitted only after obtaining a special use permit. b. The existing zoning provisions contain no minimum lot sizes or other significant dimensional requirements. The new zoning ordinance would establish a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. and a minimum frontage of 75 feet. Although no height restrictions would exist under either the existing or new zoning ordinances, excessively .high .structures would be regulated under the Airport Overlay provisions. c. Site plan review and approval will be required to insure conformity with all County requirements. c. An entrance permit from the City of Roanoke must be obtained. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: The parcel is generally flat, with a knoll in the northern portion and drainage swales along the eastern and southern portions (along Rt 117) of the property. A small pond is located in the Swale along Rt. 117. b. Ground Cover: The majority of the site contains low growing vegetation and scrub with thick tree cover on the perimeter of the property. Along the eastern Swale is a significant stand of mature hardwoods. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. This area is designated for high growth and is currently served by urban services. b. General area is developed primarily with office, mixed commercial and residential uses. Adjoining the property to the west is the clear zone of the Roanoke Regional Airport. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. .Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan map, but could be inconsistent with a number of the Land Use Guidelines, including Policy TR-1, prevent haphazard commercial sprawl along major highway strips, and TR- 2, encourage new retail uses to develop in planned groupings. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Adjoining the property to the east are residences with offices along the frontage of Rt 117. The airport clear zone is located along the western boundary. Two single family residences (and three additional unimproved lots) .are located just north of the property. Access to these properties is provided by Dogwood Acres Road, a private road which runs just off the western boundary of the property in question. 2 c. Neighboring Area: The neighborhood is comprised of a mixture of residential, office and commercial uses, the airport clear zone, and further west, the Valleypointe Industrial Park. 4 d. Site Layout: The site is presently occupied by an abandoned residential structure with associated outbuildings. (See attached plan of existing conditions.) The previous owners have repeatedly tried to secure these buildings from unauthorized entry with little success.- The County Building Department recommends that these buildings be demolished and removed from the site to eliminate a potentially hazardous condition. Vl..'" No proposed site layout has been submitted since the .future use is unknown at this time. However, a site plan was approved for Royal Buick Corporation with two entrances (as proffered) and complete regrading of the site to accommodate the auto dealership. This plan was never implemented and the approval has expired, and will therefore require total re-review for any future development. N A e. Architecture: Unknown. No historic resources have been documented on this site. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Screening and buffer will be required in accordance with prevailing County ordinances. Existing perimeter trees afford an opportunity to adequately buffer any commercial uses from adjoining residences. NL g. Amenities: 3 h. Natural Amenities: Under the proposed unconditional zoning, the existing pond, drainage swales and stand of hardwoods will probably be eliminated in developing the site for commercial use. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: In 1990 the average-daily trips (ADT) along Rt. 117 was 25,500. Since the future use is unknown, specific estimates of trip generation are not possible. According to Trip Generation by ITE, a 12 acre office park would generate on the average approximately 2,340 ADT. A neighborhood sized shopping center of 80,000 sq. ft. would generate on the average approximately 6,000 ADT. Development of this magnitude would impact Rt. 117 and could require signalization. The ADT for the auto dealership was approximately 570. 3 j. Circulation: Access and on-site circulation are unknown. To an extent, the number and spacing of access points would be controlled by the existing subdivision regulations and the new zoning ordinance, given this sites location along a major arterial road. .Presently no median cut or crossover exists to serve this property to accommodate access to the site from east bound traffic on Rt. 117. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission: DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Property is located in the upper reaches of a tributary to Deer Branch which feeds into Garvin Creek. n. Floodplain: ~~` PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standards. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standards. NL q. Parks and Recreation: r. Schools: TAX BASE NL s. - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Signage must conform to the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's request is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan map, but could be inconsistent with the established land use guidelines. Although retail uses are encouraged in planned groupings, haphazard strip development is generally discouraged within the Transition land use category. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The request at hand would eliminate conditions on the site's use and development and improve the marketability of the site. b. Weaknesses: (1) The lack of information on the future use and development of the property makes it difficult to fully evaluate the impacts of this request. (2) The petitioner's request could be inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan's Policy TR-1 and Policy TR-2 where strip development is discouraged in favor of planned commercial centers and .groupings. (3) Intensive development of this site could impact Rt. 117 and require signalization for access and other measures to improve circulation. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) The existing buildings shall be demolished and removed to an approved disposal site within 90 days of the approval of this petition to rezone the property. fit.-- i r ~ ~ ~ -3 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF_COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE COUNTY r- 00 D~ to f- Z H Z 0 v Q W 0 oc Q IN RE: A 12.26 acre parcel of land, generally located on Peters Creek Road adjacent to Airport Clear Zone, within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel Nos. 37.08-I-5 37.08-I-6 and 37.08-I-8, in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Royal Buick Company, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. I. That the property will be utilized in in substantial conformity with the development plan prepared by T. P. Parker E Son, Engineers ~ Surveyors, under date of July 6, 1987, with the exception that there will only be two entrances to said property. 2. That the showroom to be constructed will be a ~STERHOUDT, FERGUS~N NATT, AHERON 6 AGEE eTTORNEYS-AT-LAAI WOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1fi99 two-story structure. 3. That all lighting will be shielded away from adjoining properties and will be directed solely upon the subject property. ~"`~ 4. That one entrance shall be aligned with a cut in Peters Creek Road, either at the existing location or at a new location, should the present location be moved. 5. That all drainage, screening and buffering shall be in accordance with the Roanoke County Ordinances. 6. That there will only be two signs on the property which are not attached to structures. The signs will be in substantial conformity with the design attached ~ hereto. Respectfully submitted, ROYAL BUICK COMPANY Of Counsel OSTERHOUOT, FERGUSGN NATT. AHERGN 6 AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAN '"'NOKE, VIRGINIA 3018-1699 (Edward A. Natt, Esquire 'Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 rezon4.n3.c 2 ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION Date Rec .: '7 - Received By:. (;~_ Case No.: ~~ Ord. No.: ~~d~- c~Q ~/a 7.2~ -~ ~~ ~i 1. Owner's Name: Dominion Bank, National Association Phone: 563-7891 Address: 201 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke VA 24011 2. Applicant's Name: Dominion Bank, National Association Phone: 563-7891 Address: 201 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke VA 24011 3. Location of Property: Peters Creek Road, VA Highway No. 117 Tax Map Number (s) : 37.08-1-06 and 37.08-1-08 4. Magisterial District: Hollins Ma isterial District 5. Size of Property: 12 087± acres 6 . Existing Zoning: B 2 with .proferred condition of construction of auto dealership Existing Land Use: Raw Land 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2 Return to B-2 zoning without conditional auto dealership Proposed Land Use: designation 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: N`/A 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes N/A No (If you are .voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation. of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: $790,000.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: (Per Brian Duncan do not need) g Letter of Application !~_ Concept Plan g Metes and Bounds Description ~_ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~_ Vicinity Map g Application Fee N/A Written Proffers g Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent• DOMI BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Signature r ~ ~_--- Date July 24, 1992 TITLE: Assistant Vice Pr ident I~uminion Bank,h;ur. Corhonuuin I'.O. Box 133?7 Roanoke, Vireini:~_JIUU (703) 563-7891 0 :s a ti~ DOMINION BANKSHARES July 28, 1992 Mr. Terry Harrington Fla:.rir.^y Director Roanoke County, Department P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 of Planning ~( .. Re: Property Rezoning Request - Old Royal Buick Property - Now owned by Dominion Bank, N. A. Dear Mr. Harrington: Recently Dominion Bank submitted an application to remove a conditional zoning on the referenced property and return it to it's original B-2 Zoning. As Dominion Bank is the owner of this property, this rezoning would aid in the remarketing of this property. It is the intention of the Bank to market and sell this property for General Commercial or Retail/Office use as provided under the B-2 zoning restrictions. Please call my direct phone number listed above if there are any questions. S i ncere].y, ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ Alaric G. Heinemann Assistant Vice President AGH/ace '. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ n{ Wh ~ L ~ ~ , ~ ~ '~ `\ ~i~ .r'~ •~• P lam, ~ r~' • \ ~ .-. • !, r , I r 1L-rlE / •V .,+nr 1 +awlLyr ] ~-~---~;-~1Y~ ~' ~ ~ :Comparable .Land sales ,~ 'r-•~ U~~ ~^~ . rl..J ~ I _ , ra R~ . - t •; rf ~nu,Kt •• ~ ti M,~L a . c~wr~~ r,f•~/r tX,t ..+D r~ir~rDr rt> J $ I lAl(~ ~ ~~ NQ~fTH ] ~~'~~~ I Z 1581 Ef,r ~\~~~,: / ~Qq, £ ~ ~$ :~ pp'MOIY ttiwa°D`A' C j.. : ~' ' ~` Eby , n.rv y HoyLl1 ~,N9a t R/NG51DM.. /`( ~•- f _,aOfPq y 0,4 nrEN NT i1~.- DRS • ~ •ro,ryd~'WI LO K =_ p, <j.l -'~• ~~.•~ ~~{~f 7O, ~~ ~~~a ~ .K r ~ GIllB r.~`~~ d - NrN s ~ tr++rr 1 ,,,,,~j::L~~ g rroRrrrsrw '`•„rc ~ ~ ~ ./(~~yJ M APTA1 ~RWE 'ST RyS rnY Mr.r1 •~~~ 1 ti fM~NMNV00 8 ro""°w { ~w~rw• :Y ,. +. , ), i- :~ / !J ,' ry, fir" :r • ./ ~ ' F~ '~ 1~ .•• i 7 ~T X` I ENY 4N'~ , // ' ~ ~~r~~ 11~ „yr s r ] r~ ~ • ~ MSrDr O. ~,~` r...-'~:. ~t~ <C-~r(i~YP // ~'~ R.I ~L iLU ~ - _ d','~r.:'1 d ~, rs c~ r ~ ~1• •`R/9'R ~ r, 13`' ~~ / EA ~~ ~Rf ~ r`bna: ~ ; ` ` N ... ~ A ~°" ~<'~ 'l'p. .- ----"' ~/~ twTM~ fit)-f ~ ~.~c I 1/ y~!y ` 4 ` ,~ }fi~,i ~ 4 ~ l 'tx, tl ~\ ~ ~ a~v".}~^ ' IFK~U~II1~t q v F )~O3 .• r l r ~ ' ~ ] M ~~•, ' rig ~ ••,F?gd, rNRKrI Ot1./ ' I -;` .:.. I.r(FA;~"I 1 ;< r~ vrr¢'"p J ~ artrrnn /NN ~[~/~r: E[~t,r.~r~-r•r, ~~~~~9}!~ FR~ r rOl/R T gg YI1R4 l I ( / 1~ j.~-~~ ~N:(1~ 1 ~ /.r"' -' ~~ arm S .~~ • for fyo~ P ~yc ~ i..: ~ 1 I I / / ~~_ ~ r~ -~~ •: ~• ~~~ ~ ~y ~ \.~ Gt[r ~~,I ~~?~ 1~ ~~'+ r r` ~ ` \`C ~•,?`)"C/,1} u /1!/jPU~I r~~` <~ \~f~~ COVE \ ` .fit.-yt ~ y`, /'~ I ~, :. ~LEu. \ ; . .11 ;`` `•~ 9~ ~ _ / .\ •,~ -, ' li'c;alVL)ft~F ~~, ~ ~~` yIR SSOOrr L~ 1 L iJ ~' ~ '\ •• ~j~. •`r ~~ ~ '1 rur. / '^ ~~~ UeErf~ •~ ~ `t\ ~y~.~,' 1~ 1 ~ A'lUN/C.;GAL t e I -r ~ e~: i h 5 r,• tl °-~~ :r~ AFROW WODU P' , 1 1-"y ° ~•'~ ' - ~ rr- Y`, rot '`~;: f- ,`\ \.• r , , p. f O t w/ l MILL~~''((,, .r ~~. ~Y' .r \,_\., 1t-MIRi+~ ~`FjFj' r f ~<~" ~.9 4 •I' r- rc....~. , ,:~~ 'u•ri'` .~ EZ5;1~!_ ~f1 I ~ n , ~y ,Ee ~ ~e:t I I ~ C o~ r +~~, OAy ~~- 6 ' AnNE FArrcw ~ Z 1 i/~ • "~,, ~p1F rS^.'~~. t ^THICW ~ d 4 I ~ R'wor ~`~ ~` / ' Pe~P.~,Ty~x S~ /~~ ~lrQ^~. r •.!! ~ ~l ~l ~ ~ "Y~~~ r~''S~,P~B ~ir•OK E ~r . ~ ovTU rru6 /' J., N*, /.. • • •~r a> I • .rte I.,aca ,h,i'~;• ~~/~,~ 8 ~ \ wR.winwwh~~ ~i P. \ ~• ~~ ~• •~ ti RLC ~'.."' ~~ r ~ o/ , ~ ~ r ~` S 91W ~ E ~rwrr ntww •' C• _.% 1 . r~1, r ~ Cy • -•i., }` rTr _ ~ COVE EN ~. f•f'. 7d ' ~ ~;% I ":; ~ t 'rr ,'`il 9 \t / y ~Sr $ ~ Mruar R r ~~s ~~ b },~r •~Ptrr B ~ .~ ~.w, t~ ~. ~•• ~ '~"a ~,,~fxSTEA,a~Tor N • w0 ~`:'',;.p~ ~ ,IH~~+ ~ G ~ ~c^ n,rr ~ Y B \-,~y ~.•,~~'Q,, /dN. w r ' rrDRn. rds ~ ~ ~-~,~? 3 .,~' `..r: 9. ~4.. / °Z 4 ¢. ~ /(ytt -- ~ d ~~'t< -.:F" rr , rrQrr,~, I ~ ?CI`f \ I t piC' ~.p ~,.' • r ..n~ ~'F'Y.Y'LY H , I ~ ' 1 (y sl 4- ~ [~~~ r'' Fl O '•\ ` IAl W I ±- > ,~ . • H~ 'J/FmJ~i} HERSHeERGE ~,.. .:. ~ \~ g ~Jf`/ ~y,ll . ~a4- ,~ I 1rrD ~ rr.rru ~,. vo ., ~~ OKr~rpp '`\. _•"`-^'' -wronrs ey~ ~ T O fA NL;~, tY~I 1 ~cr ~. ~~S'-'°°`~ /yl ~-~rrf~rfr r~ i'.~tr nrr~~a ~R~~,~' ~ ~ y~ -1~~ ...~.r P,f Rpmnwrti -•~. ~y / Mrr 1y a OrRS<~ ~, .fit ~o~ f' ~ Il~'rr, rtr... 6 "-3~ p ~ r_rRU; nG~ W -S (OIGTIJN IGNT5~'~~ r __~ATHArM a!L'? N~ q. . -.... ~ \ d \~5..••'- sa. ~. o- ~~ RO4Nnnf ~' ~•~ ~' Q ' `C~/ ,t ` ~ 8'NI ~~ ~ \ {fit wt- tw r F'} ,, • ~ ~ r ~ CO[/N/A'1 C't f/q' ~; 4 d{ .. LL ~ ~~ iD " r4 I • t m .RGi ~pp --y *. ° , ~ UKM I~ s \ ~Q~j~ S ^Y"~ ynDB nrrtr ~' it ~:~ f r~, U.A~j}EP+fTS w O t A a-r ~~> ~ al, ~~ ~,:ar,.f~ ~ ~ Wqo ~ME~ ~ VIEW ~a° F ~ 4'3lW+LMH -S~~inppf~(` I r t 4~ $UM , r: •; rER w E•Nr ~t% ? ~ ~ 'POSE r- . , i7 ~~ .. ~~I t~ j~' e Si ` I f I i, ~ ~ ,~1 . r, ~~`rw • l rD v ~ r,r •vr w ,~ mil; ~ q~ ~ IY?~~'Vp ~ro•+~~ n .~7`rf..Y•~y.',.k d D Aw _ •.I _.i 1 ' ~_ -- G~ ' fit. ~ ~~~~; ~/ r v, `'"riD~ o awrri '4r ~,.,~rr .. `` , r r..,,, ~ D/NA.:II r r.•.n ~ ' ~`' rvav -. ~ ~ _ > ~ fi.h papa r+t..,`r cr 'v -~ <.C.~M~N N {.,T. .r'•.~ .. r rN~ JPrJ - r1illpw ~ OQ $ BAR ~4, w ` rMAr b ~v~•s.4~r r0 ' 1471 $ ~ uf;~}nyr ro~• r.4~+rr r Wr.l 4ti,r ~ r :r r, ~ ~ 'p rv _ ,~~ ~ -ar ~6~ ~'r , _ Q~~ .. ~r {41 <" "`y ' t., 1 ~ ~ I /q rq. /.~y~ll' C, _~- ~ •E' ~ r Rr~- Mr r' Av 4 ~"' r4"rM ~ ~ ,-.,~./ ~~ w-c,. :` ~.r I f!1 *CF/..~rrrr•>r d,. t.F 4 ~ F a~ jr ~ 'w .... /.l{_Iy~ .1j • . r T.~~ k~PANMA;~, ~ r r r r i ~ ti +• ~i H G ~ W, _ • / ~//~.. •ron rrl rfy a e N4! 6.r ul r S :~r r`~1 rf ~°,o C r•^'~ r'"`~ y OR.~ ( 1 5 G rURfe~ CS~ wve rot ~,y ~ f~ gLEM r l I n ~ 1 1 ~ rc / o"'rr .f,?~00 _ ~' 4 ~'. ~ ~ n[r ErF ; ,y `- ~ F R~ _ 1'"- 'i'" ~ TURNPIKE •rrr ~ ' r a~ a •+' _ y fGgr.YrlLrNONT F~RAf$ ~ [ ~ ,G rrw rirr rn.. rr rNOVr <on.r r i~ I ~v ~C ` r-' l . 11~ ,.~~ ~ - ~ ~~ it r~. ~~./,"r ~.'nr- ~ ,. nr ~ t . l Laa+II+'~. pUfr[r NrER y .v \~j7'-- 9M~ ~v / ~~~: ~ r;y ~\~ ~,wMwIFti PAA7gI _~~__~;.r ~ ~•r A~_ ~~_` L: '--~A/\•lOt rJ Y~1~r ~_~J=.,~~ ,,M,hswNll j ~ .t, Wa~.~.~, /. ! t l 1 A .. ,`~1 r11, r..~Y: `J ,i.~ 1 ~ ~ i~ + ~ ;irF/1~NDGl~K NUNNtLI{.~~rr,j _..- M' n.~ O ~ ~~(/ ... / /~ ` •w T. ~ r ~ `• + y `~ r•^L^r ~r~ BLNER `' . - _ ~ qy 'Y,I - _ u, ~r , CfYr • •!P, ~~ r`` !~(:~,A!,r ~ f..... _ I n ,~ n ,t , ~.,. + ~~~ ~%.~ ..r... ,..1 . NP,uo, C _. _ ~ sa. rY ~~ ~ '~ Gr~M . ~ •v ~'4, :cf t "5 ' ` ylE3i'++A ~ wcc'`a. ,+ 1 ...• ' `~w+Y,; ,r' ~ ~~ fY' 74 ` •~ e ~•. 1 LEGEND .. - Storm Sewer Grate ~ - Transformer _ - Culvert - Shale Exposure ~ - Barrels and Drums ® -Small House t Residential P ert~es u-~ 1• uuZUU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~iy~ ~, rop Vacant a ~ ~ ® I Land ~ ® d~ , pal Main j / ® House '~ Stream i ~ ~~ ~~ ~ Parcel 1 ~' ~ I 9.967 Acres ; ~ ~ ~ Parcel 2 • , ,. ! 2.17 Acre~~ ~ v • 1 ~ ~ 1 Intermittent ' ~ ~ ~ ' ^ `~ ° `• . •Stream ~ ~. ~ ~-' - ~ Concret/ ~ ' N ~ ' 1 ~ • ~ / ^ ~ Pipe ' ~ ' ~ N = \ Gravel ~ ' Creative ~ -o Dri :re u~f1 o ~ ' o Advertising Agency ~ 3 (~, ~ O ~~ ~ ~ o ~ P nd ~ ~,~-- Guardrail Pond Peters Creek Road I - - Roanoke ~ Airport 91NCE DATE: Decem~er 1991 ~p ~ FROENLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Oc FULISEAVICEU80RATORIES•ENGiNEEPSdCHEMiSTS scALE: Not Precise "OVER ONE NUNOAFD YEARS OF SERVICE" DWG. NO. Royal Buick Site Peters Creek Road (Rt. 117) SITE PLAN 2 Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ~, Form N0.: 103 u-I D un~ru nvn ~ ~~ ~. .. ._._ _ , -. 2.6 ~!G \ ALL OTHER PARCELS ARE ZONED Al ~' p~°' ~ `e~z~s • ~r a , ~ .. R2C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED , P2+ i '"° ; Al ~ ~ ' • Al ~ , ,; , .. ~ ,; . , A1 /,~ ,, 21• 92t q• w`„ N 8 + ' / Nr „u 12 ~ D'w ~ ' ~~ ~s P~ ~ rnr /L M / ~ a f°i auf ~ . , . .°« u , r 6 ~ ~ y P ` /q c Al / ~ silo ~ / / 191= 4 p`\ Q.N 22l • N ,..~ ~ afar K '+, ,• I / Al r~r. /'' / £ ' ssna• • 2 9 N 1.25Ae ~ LSOOC / / /' / ~ ~ ~ O ~ / xs~1 ~:rw ~i. 17.16 !1p ~ s~ ": 5~ii ~ 19 • 25. 1 ff ~p ~ ' Al "to ~ , / / , p ~, ~ t f / 7 ~ ~ 91 ,Ni \=1 Q~ 1004, / ~ 28 ~ `~C ~ 09 °~ f9.7 ' ~ ~ '29 13 •~ •P , f ' 4 ft'd f °' A$ ,~ 9J`7 ` I 1 ' ~ , fL ' 1z ° et '•+ f ' / '` ; fs~tee ft ~ 11 's f9p ~ . q9` 4S° V .. / , ~'•." ~ 10 s ~ 1 ( / m LN~e j `~a :~ 32 f, s ~~ ~ ~ZG f~` Al ~°s~ ~o~ ~~ ~~ \ ~ ~~' ~ ~: ~\ .y I ~ 1 ~ i ~ ~°1 ~: 1 1 1 ~ I 1 1 1 \ ^.. ~` \$~ \\ \~ O ~J\ ~ \ ee~• ~, ~ _w~ 2 cev-~ o~ • V 4• '•' "-' .v ' 8 ~,° ~ J .~ ~tof' ~~ \ , ~` pAN k F ' - A ROANOKE COUNTY Dominion Bank, National Association DEPARTMENT OF pLANNIP~G AND ZONING Amend Proffered Conditions °" 37.08-I-06, 08 ^^v^n^~~ n~n~ 1/~. `' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE PROFFERED EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 12.26-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (ROUTE 117) APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH CENTURION ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, WITH ONE CONDITION, UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 22, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 1, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from M-l, Light Manufacturing, and A-1, Agriculture, to B-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, in August of 1987. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 12.26-acres, as described herein, and located on the north side of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) approximately 50 feet west of its intersection with Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, with conditions to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial V~-~' District, with one condition. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bank, National Association. 3. That the Petitioner, Dominion Bank, National Association, now requests elimination of the following proffered conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in August of 1987, and that the following proffered conditions are hereby rescinded: (a) That the property will be utilized in substantial conformity with the development plan prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, under date of July 6, 1987, with the exception that there will only be two entrances to said property. (b) That the showroom to be constructed will be a two-story structure. (c) That all lighting will be shielded away from adjoining properties and will be directed solely upon the subject property. (d) That one entrance shall be aligned with a cut in Peters Creek Road, either at the existing location or at a new location, should the present location be moved. (e) That all drainage, screening and buffering shall be in accordance with the Roanoke County Ordinance. (f) That there will only be two signs on the property which are not attached to structures. The signs will be in substantial conformity with the design attached hereto. 4. That the Petitioner, Dominion Bank, National Association, now voluntarily agrees to the following proffered condition: (a) That the existing buildings on the property shall be demolished and removed to an approved disposal site within 180 days of the approval of the petition to rezone the subject property. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Peters Creek Road and at the southeasterly corner of the property of Maury L. Strauss, et als. (DB 1244, page 1352); thence with a curve "' to the right along Peters Creek Road having a chord bearing and distance of S. 60 deg. 47' S4" W. 832.07 feet, an arc distance of 833.79 feet to a concrete monument; thence leaving said Peters Creek Road N. 28 deg. 39' 30" W. 875.61 feet to a pin set at the southerly corner of the property of William H. Craft (DB 1186, page 432); thence along the property line of the said William H. Craft N. 60 deg. 25' E. 331.34 feet to an old pin located on the southeasterly property line of Howard B. Fitzgerald, Jr. (DB 1117, page 784); thence S. 37 deg. 27' E. 676.37 feet to a large bolt at the southerly corner of the property of Maury L. Strauss, et als. (DB 1177, page 751); thence N. 55 deg. 48' E. 275.20 feet to a pin located at the approximate center of Lot 1, Block 1, Century Estates; thence along the southerly property line of Lot 1, Block 1, Century Estates and the property of Maury Strauss, et als., (DB 1244, page 1352) S. 56 deg. 45' 21" E. 262.11 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING, and containing 9.967 acres situate on Peters Creek Road (Route 117) as shown on a topographic survey for Eugene Lynn by T. P. Parker & Son, dated April 8, 1987. Parcel 2 BEGINNING at a point on the northwest corner of Lot 21, Block 2, Plat of Century Estates of record in Plat Book 9, page 282 of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence S. 35 deg. 45' E. 104.50 feet to a pin set at the southwest corner of said Lot 21, Block 2, Century Estates; thence along the southerly property line of said Lot 21, Block 2, Century Estates, N. 54 deg. 15' E. 15.91 feet to a pin set; thence leaving Lot 21 and along the westerly side of Centurion Road, NW, S. 35 deg. 53' S0" E. 79.92 feet to a pin set on the northerly corner of Lot 2, Block 2, Map of Century Estates; thence leaving Centurion Road and with a curve to the left having a chord bearing and distance of N. 80 deg. 49' 25" W. 42.37 feet, an arc distance of 47.05 feet to a point on the northerly property line of said Lot 2, Block 1, Century Estates; thence along same 5. 54 deg. 15' W. 103.71 feet to an old pin set at the westerly corner of said Lot 2, Block 1, Century Estates; thence with the westerly line of the aforesaid Lot 2 and 1, Block 1, Map of Century Estates, S. 35 deg. 53' 50" E. 114.48 feet to an old pin; thence S. 56 deg. 45' 21" E. 9.14 feet to an old bolt set; thence S. 55 deg. 48' W. 275.20 feet to a large bolt along the northerly line of a 9.967 acre tract of Royal Buick Company; thence N. 37 deg. 27' W. 270.03 feet along the easterly line of the same Royal Buick Company tract to a pin set on the southerly corner of property of Ellis E. & Lena D. Cullen (DB 750, page 298); thence along the said Cullen property N. 54 deg. 13' 39" E. 397.13 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING and containing 2.171 acres as shown on survey for Royal Buick Company showing a 9.967 acre tract, an acre stormwater management easement, a 20' drainage easement, and a 20' waterline easement made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd. dated December 13, 1988. "~ 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51 \agenda\zoning\dominioabnk O~ FiOANp~~ ti, Z A ~ ~ J 2 a rsaa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 September 25, 1992 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, $R., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder Governor's Office Third Floor, State Capitol Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Wilder: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92292-9.i endorsing the passage of state referenda on November 3, 1992, ballot, authorizing the issuance of General Obligation Bonds of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 1992, If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, vr-,emu-f,~/. ~C,P~--,-- Mary H. Allen, Clerk, CMC Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Mental Health Association of Roanoke Valley Virginia Western Community College Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Director, Parks & Recreation Department Dr. Margaret Hagan, Director, Roanoke County Health Department Catawba Hospital P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 ® Recycled Paper OF ~OANp~F z ~ ~' c> • a ~ 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Ms. Barbara McCann 5231 Ranchcrest Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. McCann: September 22, 1992 BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 1992, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Cave Spring Elementary P.T.A. fora raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 20, 1992. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1992. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYNOVEMBER I OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR, If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBJI MAGISTERUL DISTRICT ® Recycled paper O~ ROAN ~.~ . ,~ i' a ~ g COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 September 22, 1992 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL OISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Arthur E. Grant Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3301 Ashby Street, S. W. Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Reverend Grant: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 1992. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. LBE/bjh Cn~~xx~# ~~ ~~xx~~.~.~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Sincerely, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~ ® Recycled paper O~ ~OANp~F h ~ _ 9 O _ a 1 g COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 September 23, 1992 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Ilene Fitzgerald The Jackson Center 501 North Second Street Richmond, VA 23219-1321 Dear Ms. Fitzgerald: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 92292-2 of support for the grant application from Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau to the Center on Rural Development. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 1992. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. A len, Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Martha Mackey, Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~.~..~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 I ®aecyaed Paper o RvCVB and others . Esp t % R ~, (~~ 1 tez with the _ f~ `%~ d" Covet et R1~,{~.t//' o send a ~` ~J e, watt ~~~ 9 ou ~ ~' ~ , ~ ~" % ~~ ~/~ ,~ f~~,~~ / Let Bzenda knew ,~ / T-~~ ~'~~4~~ Tt The CORD Innovation Grant Program FY 93 Application Packet Application Deadline: September 18, 1992 The Center on Rural Development Before July 27,1992: 205 North Fourth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 804-371-2665 fter J 1992: The Jackson Cen er 501 North Second .Street Richmond, Virginia 23219-1321 804-371-7075 0~ pOAN ~.~ tia z ~' ~ ~ 2 a 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERUL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZY MINNIX September 2 2 , 19 9 2 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERUL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Donald E. Pierce 1308 Rugby Boulevard, NW Roanoke, VA 24017 Dear Mr. Pierce: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 1992, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Knights of Columbus 4th Degree Assembly for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 28, 1992. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1992. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 3l OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR, If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, C~~J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ® Regded Paper C~~~xx~# ~~ ~~x~~a ~ .~~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 ~~ ~ t, j MEMO - 9/10/92 ~ ~~ a~' f To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy ~~Q_Q~ Subject: State Bond Referenda The attached letter and information request a formal Board resolution endorsing the three state G.O. bond referenda that will be on the ballot this November. Please let me and/or staff know if you would like a bond endorsement resolution placed on the agenda for a future Board meeting. My personal preference is for the Board to adopt an endorsement resolution, as requested. However, if any Board member objects, it would probably be better to remain officially silent on this issue than to have a split vote. copy: Elmer Hodge, Mary Allen attach: Letter & Info. from Mental Health Assn. of Roanoke Valley i gip: .. ~' - ~,._, Mental Health Association of Roanoke Valley, Inc. A CHAPTER OF NMHA, INC. 114 CARLTON TERRACE BUILDING • 920 SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET ~~ TM ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 PHONE (703) 344-0931 September 4, 1992 OFFICERS President Lynwood Day, Ph.D. Mr. Lee Edd President-Elect Y Julie M. Danstrom Roanoke County Board Of SuperVlSOTS Secretary Post Office Box 29800 Marion Kunkle Treasurer Roanoke , Virginia 24018 J. William Pistner immediate Past President Dear Mr. Eddy' David W. Hartman, M.D. ' 80ARD OF DIRECTORS On November 3, Virginians will be asked to vote on three '+1ary C. Barrow general obligation bond issues : $472.4 million for Higher l/illiam L. Bauman, Jr. Susan W. Blaylock Education projects, $95.4 million for Parks and Recreation Julie M. Danstrom projects, and $45.2 million for Mental Health Facilities projects. Lynwood Day, Ph.D. Doris C. Egge If approved, these bonds will benefit nearly all Virginians by Gudrun Freeman, Pn.D. providing funds for 130 projects at 60 facilities and Rita J. Gliniecki Carolyn E. Haley institutions . These projects are critical to meet the growing Ann Harman demand for services in higher education, recreation and mental David w. Hartman, M.D. :,nn Hutton , health facilities . Thomas T. Johnson Robert M. Kahle an Southwest Vir lnia will receive $123 million 1n construction g ion Kunkle monies if the bond eferenda are passed. Specifically the James J. Lanter, Pn.D. Susan M. McDonald, Ed.D. , P assage of the mental health bond will ensure the installation of John P. McDowell, Pn.D. amuch-needed fire safety system and other life safety code Janet K. McKinney Linda J. Mitchell ~ rovements at Catawba Hos ital. It will P P provide funds for the ..ohn Parrott, Jr. construction of along-overdue Patient Activities Building at J. William Pistner S. James Sikkema Catawba as well . Nell C. Thompson Kathryn Van Patten Cheryl D. Watson, J.D. Please review the enclosed materials with members of your O. Beech Watson, III Board or organization. If you wish to endorse these bond David E. Wolfe referenda please complete the enclosed "Endorsement Resolution" and return it to me in the Mental Health Association office. If LIFETIME DIRECTORS you have questions or need additional information on the bond Joseph J. Duetsch, Ph.D. Laddie Fisher Issues , we will be ha y group . PPY to provide a speaker for our Elizabeth Hesser Richard F. Pence Jean Pritchard PP ry much a Your su ort will be ve ppreciated by mental health Marion Rich ' advocacy organizations. I look forward to hearing from you lirginia Schricker . EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR S-in/cerely, Diane Kelly ~~/ Diane Relly Executive Director ~ DR/mlr United Way Enclosures of Roanoke !alley, Inc. The Bond Referendum's Impact On CATAWBA HOSPITAL Photo oC Hospital with sketch of new Patient Activities Building CATAWBA HOSPITAL... is a JCAHO-accredited, state operated psychiatric hospital with 270 beds serving primarily psychogeriatric patients, but also with a 35-bed adult psychiatric unit providing care over 74,000 bed days of care to over 569 patients from a 12 county, 7 city area of Southwestern Virginia. IF THE BOND ISSUE PASSES... Catawba Hospital will get three projects; $1.5 million for installation of a fire safety system and other life safety improvements, $1.8 million for construction of a new patient activities building for therapy and recreation, and $800,000 for a new food preparation system. THE ADVANTAGES ARE... ~ These renovations will bring the the facility up to compliance for Life Safety Standards. ~ The renovations will improve handicap accessability and reduce elopement and safety risks. ~ Installation of the new food preparation system will reduce costs and improve food service to patients. ~ Construction of the patient activities building and installation of the Gre safety system will help the Hospital maintain its JCAHO accreditation. ~ The new patient activities building will provide space for therapies including daily living skills, music, arts 8c crafts, movement therapy, counseling and physical education. Current space for these programs are old and over crowded. November's Bond Referendum includes capital improvement projects for Mental Health, Parks & Recreation as well as for Higher Education. [over] FACTS ABOUT THE 1992 BOND REFERENDUM ~ The $472.4 million for Higher Cducation will finance 100 construction or capital improvement projects at 44 different facilities to enable Virginia to meet the growing enrollment demands; now estimated to rise by another 65,000 students by the year 2000. ~ The $95.4 million for Parks and Recreations will pay for 22 projects at 10 state parks as well as improving handicap accessibility and general improvements at all state parks and recreational facilities. ~ The $45.2 million for Mental Health will cover six construction or capital improvement projects at five facilities and the installation of a new food processing system at 12 facilities. These projects include construction of a new facility for children and adolescents, and major improvements at the State's two geriatric hospitals. ~ This is only the third time in Virginia's history the state has proposed and voted on using General Obligation Bonds to finance capital improvement projects. ~ By using General Obligation Bonds for these projects, they can be funded without negatively affecting General Fund monies used for operating state programs and facilities. ~ Approval of these General Obligation Bonds will in no way negatively affect Virginia's excellent AAA Bond Rating; now rated at being the third best rating in the nation. ~ Voter approval of these bond referendum will mean investing just over $600 million into the state's economy, resulting in the creation of an estimated 3600 new construction jobs. __ __ __ _ ~ Of this money, over $71.4 million is slated for projects in the Roanoke and New River Valley areas; projects at Virginia Tech, Radford University, Virginia Western Community College, New River Community College and Catawba Hospital. ~ Many of these projects have been "on-the-books" for a number of years, but were not possible because of a lack of revenue. They are greatly needed and, if the bond referendum is not approved, some of these projects can be put off no longer and will have to be funded out of general revenues cutting other funds for operational use. ENDORSEMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Virginia's continued economic growth and development is dependent upon the Commonwealth's ability to provide for the needs of its citizens both now and into the 21st century; WHEREAS, Virginia voters will have the opportunity to approve three bond referenda on November 3 that will provide funds to construct and renovate the facilities necessary to serve the state's growing population; WHEREAS, there have been no state-supported capital improvement programs for higher education since 1986, yet during that period enrollment in our colleges and universities has grown by 40,000 and by the year 2000 another 65,000 students will seek enrollment in Virginia's colleges and universities; WHEREAS, $4?2.4 million is earmarked for the capital needs of higher education, providing badly needed classroom, laboratory and other teaching space, correction of life-safety code deficiencies, repairs to libraries, additions to computer centers, and other needs; WHEREAS, providing for the needs of those citizens of the Commonwealth with mental disabilities is a responsibility of all Virginians; WHEREAS, $45.2 million is appropriated for the construction and renovation of seven high-priority projects for current and projected patient needs, particularly for children and elderly Virginians, enabling Virginia to meet the legal mandates for patients in secure facilities and ensuring that state facilities will continue to receive Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements, reducing demands on the state budget; WHEREAS, tourism is Virginia's second-largest industry and its park system is a vital component of that industry, helping to pump $80 million annually into the state's economy; WHEREAS, $95.4 million is allocated to upgrade existing park facilities and purchase new land, enhancing Virginia's tourist potential and increasing the flow of out-of--state revenue to Virginia; WHEREAS, taxes will not have to be raised to pay for these bonds; WHEREAS, passage of these three referenda will create 3,600 new jobs and generate $22 million in new revenue; WHEREAS, passage of these three referenda will not jeopardize Virginia's AAA bond rating; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the endorses the passage of all three referenda on the November 3, 1992,. ballot, authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the encourages the voters of Virginia to vote "YES" on each Question of whether the referendum should take effect. O O O O O O O O O O C CO N .-. ~ ^ r l~ r O h O ~ 1 ~ N 00 V H Y °8 ~ ~~ _ p N I.r N N ~ d ~ o,p~1°'~C d ~ y'.!~ a~ xoe~°~ Y 'a, ~ y ~. 1 ~•~O~'' Vi4 CCCO wz7 u•r7 w•D u ~' V 9 ~yYaQYC~ Y ~ a ~, ~o o~v u» 3 8 e ~w°~X~~o 8.'a~ a z E+ U A Z a ~ O O O O O O pp pO O pO O O pp pO p O pp O pp O O pO 8 V O O O O pO O O O O O O 0 0 e 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O l~ to N cf N I~ M .~•. o^O b O h a~ 8 .Ni 00 O vi M O vi Vi ~ .~. ~ ~O N f~ ~O V1 ~O ~e 7 ~O N N t~ V1 Y1 N N 0\ N t+1 ~O ? ? <O^ T f~ //~~ ~ N ^ e1 I~1 N A ~ y ~ o0 //yCy~ ° ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ M~1 ~~ y ~ ti~ yo a ~ O L y G U ~ ~" ~ ti ~~ b U w, ~ ~ ~~~ ~;a en ~ yw~ 'm' ~ a'.,'~~ve ~e~°~ t4 ~~U Ana ~Z`~ ' ~ g °:iCj~geo',~ `w' '~ ~'.3 w,K.~u.~ Y> yt az ~ g'~av~4 a ~Y~Ygu8C~0'.lZ w'a3Uv~i0~~~~ ~,°'~~ ce `c~.~ 4' ~ 4. VJ W Q W 4r 4.. s.. . O O Y O ~ o~~'~~ o ~ o~ ~o,[ e a o~ eo,F o~ o ~ g e~ ~ ~ ~~3 ~ Y ~;a a `~~> ~j e~ ~fc~[w"'F•~$ S~y,~CBe°Y 828•ErG~ceB~u„ T&i a R¢ ~U ~A ~~UYU s~,U~~U~UU ~U er7~~~~x~~~~~«U eaFB o z m~ x m ,.w~ a~t z z z O off. ~ ~ 3 ~ ~° ° v~ "ZU F o a o°o~ ~ $$S °7$ ° v°i $g ~ gggg $$88S S~°o\$ $~$g$g ~0pp `Q~1 p t~ Qo v+ v ~ a ~ h N ~ Q CW~ hr M e°p ^~~7, y~ ~Qt~+1~ v~1 ~t~+1NO~DO~ ON+O ?~O~tnO~ N N .-~ ~ MN~•+ .-+ N N ~ w7 M7N^ Nr00N V1 NAM MGM.-%t+1^ ~ _ 7 d+ C7 u w m c ~ ~~ ~ $ e Vm~ ti YZa O ~ •.~~~~V'd Ym „ a q ~.. pppp ~ Y }C~ s g~S°a~~b o~ c e ti a"~a~a a~ vUa >~>~3~ H mr~~ s~v~,.3~5>~~^~~~ 5a~~~m~ _ C > > ~ ~w 00 ~ oo c 00 ~ 'c U ~? ^ ~° ~! K a a 0 z y 00 C a ~E Y W ~ o x ~:s.~' Q o. ~ ~, F oar m~ z C~ ,~ aa:a U ~gyy$s$p$pspp egg~ pspp ~$ $$$g$g~ sss$$p~pp $$ $ g_ $g g$ $ g$ $s s~sp ~ ~ O~'r~NOe~ F 1/~ ~ ON01~0~1~ v1f~N NOe1 vM1 f~~1 O ...N ~ hr h.°. ~O 0~0 ~O OON...O wn ~ ? ~~ ~ONO~btN~1 OnNaO 8 app ~, 1~ ~O V1 ~ t~~1 00 a O N 7 Vt 700 'S T O ~ 7N1 N e~i vi e1 N 7 e1 ~O ? 700 ^ N .-~ ~ h ^ .r O V'1 O '+ ~+i M .. M „~ 7 h ao e.; 7 '.; vi 7 M V pp Y p ~ ~' ~ ~ O ~. Ii' L U .~ 0 ~ a ~,p °' eo ,~ ~~> a .~o~ •~~'pq H °° ~~g ~ 3°~eo E>c~'~pp ~U ~ ~ ~<~ UHF-i~.~ ao c~ a c~<<,..~;aca3 ~c7UZamz~USUm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ss$s sss$s N$$sa ~ ss$ssg ssNs$g~ osg $ $ss s e$g~ $$~$g~ ~O Wi ~O N 1~ Hi pp pp w.~ pp pp pQ ~~pp pppp ~0pp p Q~ p N pp ^ Q bOMOh~ 0000 rO~~n?fin OMO °~80~0\~O O~Q~80 NbW V) ~t~S: 1~ MN^~ t°~1b NY010D t 7 7 BOO 1/~ 1 ~N .~ O~ M ~O o0 CC CC I '.~+ CC O~ 00 ~O N ~i` 7 00 O~ M O'+ _ MONO C`` .:700 NV1 ~O fir °~.~M..^On [~7h.•• M ~ e~Onn Q ~O°~ ... M..:M U ~ ~ ^ ~ M ~ (`IM ~O YI 7r Na N .•• ~O !~ h M C AA~~ ~ ~ M I~1 @ CC O '$ O ® ~ O ° 00 MMp~ app ti~n~, 1 48~ ~ ,~~ ~t+°~ ~~iS ~ ~v v~ x ~ ~ r~'w v~i ~g~~ ° o~ iiN~ cE~~ ~ dim$ 9 a>, >` a~'ica~~~L c~' € ~~ ~~~' ° 3U~~F~~ voi~ °'~'°'~ G W F° ~~ U° c~~w ~~~~ ~U~~3• CGV.~d`~ am~~$ ~" Y ~ 3E a O~;o z~•$ ~+3 0 fY. z$~T-t >..a° ~ c o~°" ~ ~ ~ ~.~' ~d! $ ~o'~„~F' ~ qq> 0:7'~ °.~` ~3~qg D~ W ~ ~. e Y ~'' am ~3 fi c~ }~ 3 ~ U~ m ~'aS °•3<~+= C~~'.3 `T"~d,~~~~•' w~ ~' $°+,~~9~'j U qua: ~ r~-,~c~° ~ >~~ ~3~~ °~°~. ~ $ eci u~ = v :a~ o c 5'i ~ a u'~u ~'?~ O ~"~o ~',~.~ c~ O ~ ,"~,wE'rc~~ w<~~~~ ~ ~ o x ~aaa ~a ,vU Ufa[-w a[] ~oi~.o:Um ~ wed, ~ R s~ ~ r~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~ ti ~ ~$~ .., JOE A ABBATELLO 4312 ETON ROAD ROANOKE VA 24015 989 6146 DONNA 4 10-37 EDWARD J. AESY 505 CAMPBELL AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24016 344-7525 JUDY 4 08-48 DAVID W. ALDERMAN 6647 NEWLAND ROANOKE VA 24019 362-4571 SUSAN 2 09-53 DONALD R. ALOOF 4131 MUDLICK ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 774-6373 PAULINE 3 09-36 DAVID A. ALVARAO 2636 SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD ROANOKE VA 24012 345-1803 M 2 03-39 ALBERT W. ANDERSON 3249 WOODLAND DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24015 774-2546 MARIA 3 HLM 12-16 JAY L. ASSENAT 2947 FLEETWOOD AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24015 RAYMOAJD A . ADAMS 706 RAMADA ROAD VINTON VA 24179 344-4280 ELIZABETH 3 12 JOHN R. AESY 3916 MUDLICK ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 CJ~iARLES R . AESY 2024 WALLACE AVE ROANOKE VA 24012 981-9234 -27 DIANA 3 11-60 JOHN W AKERS 2915 KENNEDY ST. ROANOKE VA 24012 744-3642 LORRAINE 4 HM 06-23 GERALD L. ALDERMAN 36 OAKLEIGH CT. RICHMOND VA 23233 M 3• 08-55 PHILIP R. ALOOF 1219 LAUREL STREET, SE ROANOKE VA 24014 563-0779 S 3 02-65 W. TODD ALDERMAN 2319 TUCKAWANA CR 85 ROANOKE VA 24017 366-1569 KIM 3 12-62 FRED G. ALOOF JR. 5080 CROSSBOW CIRCLE,..SW ROANOKE VA 24014 343-7478 989-5997 EDNA 4 HLM 10-12 JOAPJ 4 OS-26 CARL A. AMOS JOSEPH A AMRHEIN RT.3 BOX 1150 3125 CLOVERbALE DR BOONES MILL VA 24065 ROANOKE va ~an~9 703 721 5796 FRANCES 4 03-28 P I ETI#O ANGELELL I 2450 BERMUDA ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24017 563 8822 M 2 07-48 RICHARD T. ASSAID JR. 2748 DIPLOMAT DRIVE, NW ROANOKE VA 24019 562-1554 562-2449 BETTY 3 HM 12-24 ROSE 4 HLM 11-15 WILLARD R. ATKINS FRED ATTALLA 2343 KAREN DRIVE 3802 GREENLAND AVE. SALEM VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24012 774-0258 389-3020 ROSEMARIE 3 07-38 KATHY 3 09-41 LAWRENCE A. AUSTIN REV. ASSAD AWAD 2302 CROSSINGS DR 2238 BRANDON ROAD LITHIA SPRINGS GA 30057 ROANOKE VA 24015 1811 MAIDEN LANEE ROANOKE VA 24015 P.O. BOX 7638 H I CKOF~Y NC 28603 :'66 5079 ISABELLE 3 10-18 RICHARD BALANDER 530 WALNUT AVE., SE ROANOKE VA 24014 PGK 5028 SHADY SIDE DRIVJ~ ROANOKE VA 24018 MAUREEN 3 11-40 1 HLM 03-32 TIM BANE ROBERT K. BANKS 3639 OVERBROOK DRIVE, SW 726 MONTROSE AVE., SE ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24013 989 3478 CATHY 1 06-59 LEO T. BARBER PGK P.O. BOX 4307 ROANOKE VA 24015 342-9816 4 08-30 EDWARD G. BEATTIE 183 FREEDOM ROAD BRISTOL VA 24201 703 669 4514 4 HLM 12-17 LEON J. BEEKMAN 1427 SHENANDOAH PARKWAY CHESAPEAKE VA 23320 804 436 4744 JOAN 3 03-33 V_ AL ENT I NE L . BERNYS JR . PGK 4202 OORDELL DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24018-3016 GLORIA 3 HLM 06-19 VICTOR V. BARANAUSKA 1844 GRANDIN RD.#3 ROANOKE VA 24015 343-3958 989-2152 PENNY SUE 4 02-59 BEATRICE 4 02-56 REV. JOHN Q. BARRY CHARLES BAUC~iAN JR. P O BOX 548 630 RAMADA ROAD NEW SMYRNA BEACH FL 3217 VINTON VA 24179 3 HLM BARRY BECKNER 6009 FLAMINGO ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 989-6693 ANGELA, 2 07-51 J. STUART BENTLEY 3103 RED ROCK ROAD ROANOKE VA 24015 989-4874 KAREN 3 03-51 ALFRED J. BERTOLAOCI 2709 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 342-0532 GINNY 4 02-30 FRANK X BEEDENBENDER PGK 1625 DOC7NOOD LANE LYNCHBURG VA 24503 800 KC1882KC 3 JOHN S. BENTLEY 426 KING GEORGE AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24016 982-6888 RAMONA 3 09-28 STANLEY M. BLANEY 1312 RUGBY BLVD. ROANOKE VA 24017 989-9282 989-8433 342-1342 BERNADETTE 4 04-51 LYNN 3 10-43 FRANCES 3 10-31 F. W. BLANKEMEYER JR FRANKLIN W. SR, BLANKENM JOHN F. BLEWETT 1424 SHERWOOD AVE 5113 RED STAG RD. 305 FOURTH AVE ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24014 GLEN BOURNIE MD 21061 344 3237 g 4 06-64 ROBERT A BOMBER 5225-2 KING ARTHUR CT ROANOKE VA 24019 562 1443 JOSEPHINE 3 03-42 RICHARD G. BOUSH RT. 3 BOX 1558 VINTON VA 24179 989 0916 M 3 CHARLES E. BOUSH 2109 WESVAN ROANOKE VA 2401/2 /(1'~ `1 344-7859 ~' PAT 4 FRANK W. BOVA 4230 GRANDIN RO ROANOKE VA 24018 301 760 1206 00-31 M 1 10-51 JAMES P. BOUSH 4410 WOODLARK LANE CHARLOTTE NC 28211 06-34 3 DAVID A. BOWERS AD 335 W. CHURCH AVE. ROANOKE VA 24016 890-6527 774-4566 345 6622 GERALDINE 4 06-31 EDITH 4 HM 08-23 ALISON 4 05-52 ' ~ I ~ ~'',~ 890-6527 774-4566 GERALDINE 4 06-31 EDITH 4 HM 08-23 GARY W. BOYD ~ DAVID R BOYER 3807 VAUXHALL ROAD 5750 CRESCENT BLVD. ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24014 i 989-6778 989 8337 JESSICA 3 12-44'~ KATHLEEN 3 ~ 07-63 EUGENE F. BRADY REV. DANIEL O. BRADY PGK P.O. BOX 345 2920 CRYSTAL SPRING AVE. TAZEWELL VA 24651 ROANOKE VA 24014 343-2107 MARY 4 HM 09-22 S 1 HLM 11-45 GEORGE F. BREENE THOMAS J. BRENNAN 178 HOUSTON AVE 5609 INGLESIDE DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 366 8734 LOUISE 3 ROBERT J. BRYAN 5421 SNOW OWL DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 774-5672 SHARON 3 09-47 KEITH C. BURNETT 85 SUMMIT WAY ROANOKE VA 24012 345 6622 1 /~~~ ~'• ~ ` L y \. ~ ~ C..~ ALISON 4 05-52 EDWARD C. BRADLEY 5811 PENQUIN DRIVE ROANOKE DRIVE VA 24018 989-4057 JUDY 2 07-44 TIM M BRADY 551 PETTY AVE. ROANOKE VA 24019 563-1491 SHARON 3 12-52 J. DAVID BRESLIN 1025 SHERWOOD AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 772-2991 342-8383 12- REBEOCA 3 08-44 OONNIE 1 01-55 EDWIN A. BOLLARD GEORGE T. MRS BURKE PGK 3020 CIRCLE DRIVE, SW 618 GOODWIN AVE. ROANOKE VA 24018 SALEM VA 24153 389-1066 774-0660 AMELIA 4 PFN HM 12-25 LUCY 4 (PGN) RALPH M. BURR WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN JR. 3534 OLD TOWNE ROAD 20 PERSIMMON CT ROANOKE VA 24018 BLUE RIDGE VA 24064 789 8721 774-7357 977-0582 LOU ANNE 4 01-39 TANYA 3 04-36 SHARON 2 08-46 WILLIAM G. BYER JR. CHARLES E. BYNANE FRANK BYRNE 8820 VILLAGE GROVE RD 2718 WYCLIFFE, SW 2204 LIZAMAR LANE FORT WAYNE IN 46804 ROANOKE VA 24014 MONTGOMERY AL 36106 343-0915 WYNDY 3 11-47 MIRAM 4 04-14 4 RICHARD L. CALHOON CHARLES J. CALLAGHAN JR. TIMOTHY R. CALLAHAN 5327 ALEXANDER DRIVE 2624 OAK HILL LANE 3803 STEEPLECHASE WAY #3 ROANOKE VA 24019 ROANOKE VA 24015 WILLIAMSBURG VA 23188 362-2366 343-7309 804 229 7715 r ~ ~~ ~ L_~ ~'~ , ANN 3 06-56 HELEN 4 02-36 PAT 3 THOMAS W. CANARY JR. RAYMOND W. CANFIELD ROBERT E. CANFIELD 1811 MAIDEN LANEE P.O. BOX 7638 PGK ROANOKE VA 24015 HICKORY NC 28603 5028 SHADY SIDE DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 989-2789 992-5094 804 491 8004 985-0387 774-7554 RITA 3 05-27 S 2 11-71 VIRGINIA 4 08-37 FELIPE G. CANIZARES MD JAMES W. CAPPY 994 N.ROYAL POINCIAN 1611 DUNKIRK STREET MIAMI SPRINGS FL 33166 SLIDELL LA 70458 DOLORES 3 HLM 06-10 PATRICIA 3 JAMES W. CARTER LARRY G. CEKALLA JR. 5889 LOST MOUNTAIN ROAD 106 SNOWWOOD OOURT ROANOKE VA 24018 SPRING TX 77388 774-2473 MARY 3 02-42 JUDY 3 GORDON A. CHIRDON 5190 LAKELAND DR ROANOKE VA 24018 DAVID J CHOPSKI 1020 CLAIBORNE AVE VINTON VA 24179 772-0979 LINDA 3 06-50 STEVE E. CLEMENTS 3133 HILLCREST AVE. ROANOKE VA 24012 344 0901 PATRICIA 1 03-57 LOU I S OOC~~ATA 2365 OLDEFARM DRIVE JENISON MI 49428 PATRICK W. CARROLL 5529 MERRIMAN ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 INACTIVE 08-34 HARRY D. CHENEY 4223 SHAROLY DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 989-7902 MICHELE 3 06-37 TRANSF i (~JRAT I ON CHURCH P.O. BOX 416 17 E. MAIN S FINCASTLE VA 24090 CHRISTOPHER OOLEMAN 3235 FLEETWOOD AVE ROANOKE VA 24015 366-2060 989-0545 S 3 08-56 1 OS-60 CONLAN ~ KEVIN J RUEBEN E. DOLES .~ RT. 1 BOX 43 JOSEPH A. COLOSIMO 4315 CRESTHILL DRIVE, . ~ 3103 NORTHSIDE RD. r ~~~ ~ BEDFORD VA 24523 ROANOKE VA 24018 , ROANOKE VA 24019 X 7 0 ~ 7' 586-3514 '~ N 989-7969 '~ 562 1130 ~ DELORES 3 11-50 ~ OATHY 3 12-51 ~ , 06-5 ,~ KAREN 3 -' _ _ _ ~ ..__.__ - „r- ~_ HERBERT C. OONLEY HERBERT C OONLEY JR `~~ RICHARD J. CONWAY 419 WALNUT AVE.,SE - APT. 2438 BROAD STREET 6201 CORNTASSEL LAN ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 342-9255 366-0256 ~ 989-5460 M 3 11-54 SETH 4 02-23 CAROL 3 07-34 ~ A. KAMEEL OOPTY C~JILO OORSINI WILLIAM C. OOSBY JR. 2615 STANLEY AVE. 1550 BLUEMONT AVE. - #141 3221 BROMLEY ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24018 343-5047 345-6154 EDNA 4 HLM 04-09 S 4 01-36 989-4817 1 0135 GEORGE F. COSMO DAVID S. COUREY STEPHEN A. OOUTURE 1221 S. JEFFERSON ST. 3419 ASHMEADE DRIVE 6027 YVOODOOCK CR. ROANOKE VA 24016 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 THOMAS P. 004VELL JOHN M. CRABLE TIMOTHY M. CROWLEY 9761 ARCHER LANE 348 PARKWOOD AVE. 1874 ELBERT DRIVE EDEN PRARIE MN 55344 SALEM VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24018 INACTIVE 05-41 SPINGARN CRUMP 5024 TRAPPERS ROAD WILSON NC 27893 DAISY 2 02-24 JOHN O. DARTS 4743 W RIVER RD. SALEM VA 24153 389-4214 NANCY 4 12-36 LEONARD L. CUOCARO 3738 BUCKINGHAM DR. ROANOKE VA 24018 989 6439 DALE 1 07-38 BILLIE E. DAVIS 1315 SYRACUSE AVE ROANOKE VA 24017 380 2533 345-2868 366-0075 PAT 3 01-42 ____ 1 12-59 3 04-47 y' MICHAEL L. DAVIS :'BENJAMIN J. DAVIS IVi~ WILLIAM T. DEBERRY 308 BESTWICK RD. ~ RT.2 BOX 320 GK GAITHERSBURG MD 20878 ! GOODVIEW VA 24095 914 LAFYETTE BLVD. 1 ROANOKE VA 24017 297 7278 343-7849 ANGELA 1 10-54 j~ VALERIA 3 05-37 ERNESTINE 4 07-43 ~: REV. VICTOR C. DECLERCQ ANTHONY pELEO--~`-~ 1 VLAMINGENSTRAT 849 FINNEY DRIVE LEWEN 3000 BELGIUM VINTON VA 24179 3 HLM JOSEPH L DEVLIN 3030 TAMARACK TRL. ROANOKE VA 24018 989 6855 M 1 HAROLD C. DILL 6035 STEEPLECHASE DR. SALEM VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24012 772-0997 366-1582 SYLVIA 4 11-5 CISS 4 HLM 09-14 THOMAS C. DOMEIKA DARREL R. DOMINGUEZ 57 SAWYER DRIVE 275 LAVILLA DETORRIM SALEM VA 24153 CUAYNABO PR 00657 389-7523 ROSA 4 10-35 M 2 03-59 .JAMES T . !~ONCICERS WALTER .1. rXN1NFL!_Y 890-3609 RUTH 3 09-32 DANIEL J. DEWITT JR. RT. 3 BOX .362 MONETA VA 24121 772 7489 JOAN 1 09-54 GERALD L. CUNNINGS 5250 PEREGRINE CR ROANOKE VA 24014 774-4760 M 4 HLM 08-15 BRIAN H. DAVIS 1709 FAIRHOPE ROAD ROANOKE VA 24017 RICHARD W. DESO 695 WISTERIA DR. TROY OH 45373 ALICE 4 01-34 LEONARD B DIDONNA 373 CLUBHOUSE DR ROANOKE VA 24019 721-3652 563 2934 11-5 MARGARET 4 PFN 07-32 CAROL 3 09-47 HAROLD F. DILL CATHOLIC HISTORICAL SOCIE PGK 624 N. JEFFERSON ST. 335 HUNTINGTON BLVD. ROANOKE VA 24016 ANTONIO T. DONATO MD 3707 ALTON ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24014 345-2033 MARILYN 4 03-39 I IFCiI1Nl~ ~Y`~ur~i c --~~989-2789 ~- -- - 992-5094 ~-- - _ - ~~ 804 491 8004 2052 WESTOVER AVE. 7522 BOXWOOD DRIVE 5135 CROSSBOW CIRCLE ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24014 345-3902 989 3384 774-0807 WANDA 3 10-47 ELLEN 3 03-38 BETTY 1 05-27 BRIAN F. DOMMES MICHAEL V. DOWNES RAYMOND V. DOWNES 4713 TAMED OOURT ROANOKE OOLLEGE BOX 294 5708 PENQUIN DRIVE GLEN ALLEN VA 23060-3620 SALEMKE VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24018 804 375-2528 774-7527 -~Y 4 02-63 S 4 08-64 ANN 4 01-32 CHARLES A. DOWNS MICHAEL M. DOWNS PHILIP L. DOWNS 102 LONDON COURT 4000 ROXBURY LANE - # B 3339 PASLEY AVE. KING NC 27021 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 919 983 4868 KIM 4 12-61 774-1554 343-6713 JAMES L. DOWNS JR PGK 3515 OVERLOOK DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 774-3904 RUTH 4 PFN 11-60 MICHAEL J. DOYLE JR 1837 BELLEVILLE RD. ROANOKE VA 24015 345 2810 M 3 07-26 PRESTON P. DUNAVANT JR 3318 WINDSOR RD.. ROANOKE VA 24018 S 3 04-56 ROBERT P. DOYLE 4137 LAKERIDGE CR. VINTON VA 24175 NANCY 3 02-60 STEVEN M. DOYLE 4137 LAKERIDGE CR VINTON VA 24176 977-1572 977-1572 S 11- S Og- ODEON DUBOIS MATTHEW F. DUFFY 5183 YELLOW MTN.RD. #68 2719 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24018 427-1781 S 3 08-31 FREDERICK T. DUNN JR. 2911 PURPLE FINCH ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 989-1334 774-8480 S 3 07-22 MARGE 4 PFN 01-25 JACK D. ELLINWOOD JR. ALFRED ELLIOTT 3464 OOLONIAL AVE #H-38 1826 ANC~JS ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018-4502 ROANOKE VA 24017 772 6693 366-3364 CYNTHIA 3 12-58 M 1 05-49 JOSEPH M. ELLIS PIERRE ELLIS 3510 PRINCETON CIR. 5764 ANITA TERRACE ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24012 366-0440 366-5775 JULIA 1 08-43 M 3 07-68 989-6067 SONJA 3 04-40 JOHN T. EDWARDS 2201 ANDREWS ROAD ROANOKE VA 24017 563-9678 JUANITA 4 03-84 FRED C. ELLIS PGK 4514 OAKLAND BLVD. ROANOKE VA 24012 366-0559 REBA 4 PFN HM 07-24 ROBERT G. ELLIS f Pc~c ,3~'~ .qtr .:~~~ 5838 SANTA ANITA TER ROANOKE VA 24012 366-5102 S 4 09-37 DR. W I LL I AM J. ELL I S ND CHARLES J. ELWELL TFar~ec ~ io c~v~ 703 965 8211 345-2086 3 HLM 01-OS MARSHA 2 06-58 THOMAS F. ENGL PFN GERALD T EUBANK 5227 ROSECLIFF RD. 3009 GLENMONT DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 989-3708 AGNES 4 PFN 06-41 HENRY FAERY 307 WINDWARD RD. ROANOKE VA 24014 989 7619 3 01-40 ANTHONY E. FANTI 3456 FARMINGTON DR. ROANOKE VA 24018 774-3085 774-2712 MARTHA 4 HLM 01-13 CATHERINE 4 03-22 THOMAS J. FARON CHARLES B. FARRELLY 3822 SHAWNEE TRAIL 3730 WINDING WAY RD. SALEM VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24015 384-7076 INACTIVE 05-32 ALEXANDER P. FEKAS RT 1 BOX 394 FINCASTLE VA 24090 343 3358 M INACTIVE 01-38 THOMAS M. FLEMING JR 3590 LAYMANTOWN RD. DALEVILLE VA 24083 992-4866 NITA 4 12-27 SOLOMON C. FOSTER 103 13TH STREET,SW ROANOKE VA 24016 343-4842 M 4 02-18 MARTIN D. FREEMAN 1301 2ND STREET ROANOKE VA 24017 977-2529 RENE 1 01-62 MICHAEL J. FOX 520 DILLARD RD.,SW ROANOKE VA 24014 343-2444 S 3 08-62 ROBERT S. FRONTING 1311 ST JUDE ST SALEM VA 24153 989 3708 S 1 07- JOSEPH C. FACURA REV. 631 N. JEFFERSON ST ROANOKE VA 24016 344 9814 S 4 04-41 DANTE P. FARGNOLI 5730 KNOWLES DR. ROANOKE VA 24018 774-9169 3 07-25 DONALD J. FEICK 2784 HILLBROOK DR. ROANOKE VA 24018 774-0187 SYLVIA 3 07-36 GERALD J. FLYNN 13 WILD TURKEY RD. VINTON VA 24179 890-1579 ALICE 3 02-23 RAYMOND J. FOX 520 DILLARD RD.,SW ROANOKE VA 24014 343-2444 PEOGY 4 PFN HM 12-2 JACK R. GARRISON 2753 WESTHAMPTON ROANOKE VA 24015 985-0541 387 0159 M 12-49 SHERRY 3 01-62 MICHAEL H. GIBBON CURTIS A. GLYNN 5989 LAKEMONT DRIVE, SW 514 RUDDELL ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 VINTON VA 24179 989-4980 M 4 04-40 REV. RAYMOND GOVERN 1323 MCARTHUR DRIVE GRIFFIN GA 30223 774-5238 3 HLM 08-18 JOHN B. GOFF 4831 NORTH ROME DR. ROANOKE VA 24019 9819192 977 0528 M 1 05-48 SHERI 1 08-63 JOSEPH A. GREBLUNAS EMMETT E GREELEY JR. 6032 ORIOLE LANE, SW PGK ROANOKE VA 24018 RT. 2 BOX 212 VINTON VA 24179 3 HLM ALAN S. GROSSNICKLE 6958 NEW OXFORD ROAD HARRISBURG PA 17112 3 06-68 JOHN R. GUILFOYLE III PGK 2051 MAIDEN LANE, SW ROANOKE VA 24015 344-2531 CRISS 4 HM 11-24 THOMAS F. GUZI 202 HIDDEN FOREST RD. GOODVIEW VA 24095 890-3016 KATHLEEN 3 OS-51 ALFRED N. HAMMERSTROM 3464 OOLNIAL AVE 0-95 ROANOKE VA 24018 _. ~cnn owiw~n r+n ~ ~fc --- ---- -c i oci+nnccoruf n eon C _,_ - - 989-4436 890-3645 MARY 4 05-28 MARGARET 4 HLM 02-20 ANTHONY J. GUBENIA MICHAEL L. GUILFOYLE 4560 GIRARD DRIVE, SW 1002 HOWBERT AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 774-3297 S 4 HLM 06-21 GERALD P. GUZI 1816 WESTOVER AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 344-7664 3 10-47 FRANK E. HALLECK 5026 UPLAND GAME, SW ROANOKE VA 24014 959-3854 ROSEMARY 4 12-27 RICHARD J. HAMMERSTROM 2232 WINDSOR AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24015 345-7074 JANICE 3 09-56 JOHN L. GUZI 1816 WESTOVER AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24015 344-7664 PAT 4 PFN HLM 02-17 RUSSELL G. HAMERSLY 5225 PIN OAK DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24019 563-2599 INACTIVE 03-37 JOHN P. HANNON 937 HERSHBERGER ROAD ROANOKE VA 24012 774-8873 982-8247 S 3 06-15 ANITA 3 07-45 JOHN T. HANSBROUGH FRANK J. HARANZO 111 2007 TURNSTILE DRIVE, SW 5662 MEADOWCREST ST. ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24019 774-1318 MARIE 4 HLM 10-99 EDWIN L. HARNACK III 10070 GREENHOUSE ROAD BENT MOUNTAIN VA 24059 929-4268 S 3 02-62 3661334 APRIL 4 01-55 ROBERT D. HARDIE 133 WENTWORTH AVE. ROANOKE VA 24012 362 2766 366-6107 S 3 07-62 S 1 02-62 EDWIN L. HARNACK JR. VIRGINIA B. MRS. HARRISON 10070 GREENHOUSE ROAD 181 CHRISTIAN AVE., NE BENT MOUNTAIN VA 24059 ROANOKE VA 24012 929-4268 4 05-37 362-4256 THOMAS E. HARVEY ANTHONY W. HASH 5042 WILLIAMSBURG OOURT, P.O. 60X1265 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24006 774-6838 ANG1E 4 11-32 TERENCE J. HAUCK 4059 SOUTFNV I CK C I RCLE ROANOKE VA 24018 343-0494 S 1 04-67 ARTHUR E. HEDRICK JR. 2364 HOWARD ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24015 CHARLES H III HATCHER 1919 ARLINGTON AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 982-1609 LINDA 4 12-57 EDWARD J. HEFFERON 3576 CHISWICK OOURT SILVER SPRING MD 20906 rcvc~rc i ri . nuvurc i ~.n~ i nui•wa ~ . n I ~l ~ BtVtRLY L . HODG I NS I I I 2935 TAMARACK TRAIL 1855 CARLTON ROAD, SW 10335 PLUM TREE CR. # 103 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 HALES OORNER WI 53130 774-3093 RHONDA 3 08-57 JAN M. HODNETT 3417 WAKEFIELD RD. ROANOKE VA 24018 982-5624 S 3 07-51 CHRISTIAN A. HOESER 4018 KENTLAND DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 414 671 4400 MARIE 3 09-43 JEFFREY A. HOFMANN 854 MAPLE AVE ELMIRA NY 14904 772 4215 774-0958 M 4 12-60 S 3 12-27 TERESE 3 SLOAN H HOOPES WILLIAM S. HOOPES ANTHONY M. HOPPER PGIC 880 BARRENS VILLAC~ RD. 3508 MUDLICK RD. 2023 MAIDEN LANE, SW ROANOKE VA 24019 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 342-6193 362 4277 774 0069 KATHY 4 PFN HM 12-24 SANDRA 4 02-53 S 3 10 THOMAS C HOSTUTLER THOMAS C. HOSTUTLER II CHRISTOPHER D. HOWARD PGK 10724 WEST DRIVE # 202 BOX 14 901 WINTHROPE DRIVE FAIRFAX VA 22030 VILLAMONT VA 24178 VA BEACH VA 23452 804 340 4551 703 947 2342 PATTY 4 PFN M 2 06-62 3 10-60 JAMES A HOWARD MICHAEL A. HOWARD WILLIAM L. HOWARD 462 CHERRY HILL RD 3506 CANTER DRIVE PGIC PSD ROANOKE VA 24017 ROANOKE VA 24018 3506 CANTER DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 982 1918 989-9399 989-9399 BESSIE 2 12-52 S 3 01-70 PAT 4 PFN 04-40 WILLIAM L. CAPT. HOWARD WILLIAM P. HOWLEY THOMAS M. HUFFORD 111 HICKORY TREE 436 WILLaWF~NJRST STREET 1358 DENNIS LANE DALEVILLE AL 36322 CENTERVILLE OH 45459 SALEM VA 24153 389-9407 S 2 06-65 ISABELLE 4 10-14 M 4 08-35 CLARENCE C. HYLTON THOMAS J. IMMS LOUIS J. IOTT 2007 OOLGATE STREET 7049 CROWN ROAAD 1939 WALMANN ROAD ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 362 2225 774-9722 989 3081 3 01-24 VERNON E. JOLLEY 3110 HARMONY LANE ROANOKE VA 24018 CHRISTI 1 09-54 RUSSELL A. IVANHOE 512 WENTWORTH AVE. ROANOKE VA 24012 JOANNE 3 02-21 JEFFREY K. JELLERSON 5829 LITTLEHORN RD. ROANOKE VA 24018 362-3290 989-5101 989-0014 MARY 3 09-20 M 12-6 LORETTA 3 02-28 HERBERT C. JONES EUGENE J. JONES JR. JOSEPH V. JUDY III 1711 FRANWILL AVE., NW RT 1~BOX 93F 2613~B,4RHAM RD.RD. _ #8 ROANOKE VA 24017 LOVINGSTON VA 22949 ROANOKE VA 24015 344 9065 MAGGIE 3 09-28 JOSEPH V. JUDY JR. PGK 2750 GREGGIN DRIVE, NE ROANOKE VA 24012 804 263 4240 DOR1S 4 02-28 MICHAEL J. KALAFUT 3630 MARTINELL AVE. ROANOKE VA 24018 772 7395 BAMBI 4 07-60 JEAN KARKENNY RT. 2 BOX 89-B BUCHANAN VA 24066 977-4635 989 5915 992 6150 CLAUDINE 4 PFN 11-32 DEBORAH 2 12-60 SHADO 3 09-55 DANIEL J. KEELEY DAVID L. KEELEY DR. ROBERT L A KEELEY 903 CENTRAL AVET 510 28TH STREET 510 28TH STREET SALEM VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24014 344-3178 344 3178 M 3 10-60 S 3 03-62 NINA 2 07-21 JOHN M. KEELEY RICHARD M. KEELEY GLENWARD T. KEENEY P.O. BOX 8571 510 28TH ST 244 SUMMERTIME ROAD ROANOKE VA 24010 ROANOKE VA 24014 FAYETTESVILLE NC 28303 345-3450 S ~~. ~2-~7 /THOMAS D. KEENEY ~' 2032 10TH STREET, NW ROANOKE VA 24017 ~, 344 3178 S 1 OS-69 GARY KEHRES / 4000 - H ROXBURY LANE ~` ROANOKE VA 24018 ti` 28303 INACTIVE ROBERT M. KENNEDY 732 MARYLAND AVE. SALEM VA 24153 362-0844 ~...----------' 772-7719 ERA/~~ --' 4 PFN HLM 07-11 M 3 07-54 BRENDAN J. KERGER EDWARD J. KILBANE 3774 KENWICK TR. 3867 VAUXHALL DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 389-5840 CISSY 4 12-47 RONALD J. KLEBA 3585 KNOLLWOOD RD. TROUTVILLE VA 24175 774 9097 774-3814 977 3226 BETTIE 4 PFN 03- JOY 3 09-51 M 1 08-38 GREGDRY M. KNISKA MICHAEL J. KOLNOK JR. JOSEPH J. KORMANN I11 1830 YELLOWSTONE CT. # E 2457 BERMUDA DRIVE, NW 184 LAOONIA GASTONIA NC 28059 ROANOKE VA 24017 ROANOKE VA 24012 3 01-63 JOSEPH J. KORMANN JR. P.O. BOX 131 FINCASTLE VA 24090 562 1237 563-9018 LINDA 3 09-44 M 3 03-59 THOMAS LALKA CHRISTOPHER LAMBERT 1014 VINE STREET - FLOOR 68 SEDGEFIELD CINCINNATTI OH 45202 POINTE-CLAIRE QE H9R1N5 473-3585 KATHARINE 4 06-27 MARTHA 2 GLENN M. LANKFORD PAUL B. LAUKAITIS 11C' 1 /W1~ 1 AIJF C~r1'l ODMVV ~ nu ~ner~ DINAH 3 MICHAEL J. LAZZURI CELIA 3 10-58 CHRISTOPHER M. LAZZURRI 5812 KNOWLES ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 774 8482 S 2 02-72 REV. DONALD H. LEMAY 106 HARDING AVE BLACKSBURG VA 24060 3 HLM JACK T. LIDDY RT. 2 BOX 718 TROUTVILLE VA 24175 992-3868 3 02-37 C. J. LUCZAK P.O. BOX 12465 ROANOKE VA 24025 343-9548 ELIZABETH 4 08-28 THOMAS MALL 119 SOUTHHAMPTON VINTON VA 24179 989-7911 JULIE 3 11-34 ROY A. MARQUARDT 13943 104TH AVE. LARGO FL 34644-5307 MARGARET 3 03-47 ROBERT M. MCADAMM 2344 IDAVERE ROAD ROANOKE VA 24015 342 1507 2 10-63 REV. EDWARD MCDONOUGH 117 RIVERSIDE DRIVE DENHAM MA 02026 563-0148 MARILYN 4 00-24 ALAN J. LEIDECKER P.O. BOX 338 FINCASTLE VA 24090 473-3465 MARILYN 4 TFD-SALE TED R. LENESKI 912 NO. SHORE HIGH POINT NC 27260 4 03-33 MICHAEL G. LINDELL II 3628 MEADOWLARK ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 774-5541 MARIE 1 05-63 ROBERT M. LYNCH 6030 BURNHAM ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 774-1637 3 09-56 ROGER MALOUF 4025 MUDLICK ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 989-3239 3 03-55 ALBERT MARRAOCINI 6477 POAGES MILL DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 989-0007 PATRICIA 3 09-41 WILSON C. MOODY 178 FRONTIER ROAD, NE ROANOKE VA 24012 366-1505 AMNERIS 4 HLM 06-12 FRED W. MCELMURRAY 4818 NORWOOD~STREET, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 774-8482 GLADA 4 12-44 ROBERT E. LEMASTERS 2273 PINECROFT DRIVE TAYLORS SC 29687 3 05-30 ERNEST S. LEVERITT 936 BLUFFVIEW DRIVE DESOTO TX 75115 LINDA 2 DOMINIC J. LUCCHINI 4608 NELMS LANE, NE ROANOKE VA 24019 366-4998 3 08-43 REV. FRANK E. MAHLER 1415 W BRADDOCK RD ALEXANDRIA VA 22302-2707 703 578 4707 S 3 HLM 12 KARL A. MARDIAN B I RCFNVOOD APARTMENTS - # CLOVERDALE VA 24077 992-4007 1 04-71 JOHN A. MARTIN MD MD 914 OAKWOOD DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24015 342-7734 JOAN 4 HLM 04-18 TERRY E MOCRADY 6534 TREVILIAN RD ROANOKE VA 24019 563 2635 JOYCE 3 03-43 RICHARD J. MCGARRY 3945 MEADOWLARK, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 ~.. 1711 CDA6W 11 1 A1IG -~u nr ~ nw AOC 989-3244 '1C 19 OADUAV 774-4180 Df1 Df1 ~Q 3 HLM MARY ANNE 2 10-56 LORETTA 2 01-39 DANIEL J. MOGRATH MILT T. MOGUIRE LAWRENCE E. McMAHON 2436 STANLEY AVE 3415 CLARA RD. 2762 SUMMIT RIDGE RD. ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24012 345 5241 KAY 1 07-51 JAMES F. MCNABB PGK RT. 1 BOX 327 ANNVILLE PA 17003 717 867 5302 MARY 4 NEIL E. MCNALLY 2531 STANLEY AVE ROANOKE VA 24014 FRIEND JAMES M. MCNABB 533 WASHINGTON AVE ROANOKE VA 24016 343 7091 M 4 09-62 WILLIAM E JR MOQUILLAN 211 SANDY DR. BRIDGEPORT WV 26330 977 9620 M 3 12-42 JOHN F. MCNALLY 500 KIMBALL SALEM VA 24153 389-4527 BARBARA 4 PFN 12-29 ALLAN J. METER 6594 WOODBROOK DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 342-5290 989-9225 KAREN 3 08-52 M 3 02-59 PATRICIA ANN 3 08-34 OLIN R. MELCHIONNA GEORGE M. MERCER JOHN L. MERCER MD 4107 RICHLAND AVE 5027 OAKLEIGH AVE. 3132 ANGELL AVE. ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 \ ROANOKE VA 24012 \ 366-2809 366-0856 989-1653 W 4 HLM 07-14 S 2 12-1 MARY ANNE 3 10-47 LUCIEN A. METAYER REV. JOSEPH H. METZGER I KENNETH A. MICHALSKI 1105 MOREHEAD AVENUE, SE 631 N.JEFFEERSON ST. 875 BLOSSOM LANE ROANOKE VA 24013 ROANOKE VA 24016 TROUTVILLE VA 24083 344-1877 344 9814 992 6637 JOCELYNE 4 08-50 S 1 03- M 4 11-38 JAMES PAUL MIGLIARESE RALPH G. MIGLIARESE THEODORE M. MIGLIARESE 5 SAWYER DRIVE 103 REVERE CT. 344 ENFIELD ROAD SALEM VA 24153 GREERSVILLE SC 29650-354 LEXINGTON VA 24450-1756 389-0424 S 2 11-59 TIMOTHY M. MIGLIARESE 5 SAWYER DRIVE SALEM VA 24153 389-0153 S 2 06-61 MICHAEL D. MITCHELL PGK 2317 WESTOVER AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 ROSE 4 03-32 3 08-54 RALPH G. MIGLIARESE JR. PATRICK M. MINAHAN 167 FOREST DRIVE 316 JAMES STREET SALEM VA 24153 SALEM VA 24153 389-0424 389-0477 KIMBERLY 4 01-57 JUDY 4 02-37 THOMAS J. MONAGHAN ANDRE MONSOUR 6300 AUTUMN MOSS OOURT 5599 PENQUIN DRIVE CHARLOTTE NC 28266 ROANOKE VA 24018 FkANK ~. r~NS(x~n RT. 1 BOX 216 ROCKY MOUNT VA 24151 483-1670 MARTHA 3 01-46 PHILLIP E. MONTANO 2501 MAYCREST ROANOKE VA 24012 362-4068 M 3 05-17 EASTER P. MOSES 3209 GREENLAND AVE., NW ROANOKE VA 24012 366-3846 M 3 03-56 JAMES R. MUSCARO 4315 OOLONIAL AVE. ROANOKE VA 24018 774-5361 M 1 04-44 JOSEPH N. NACKLEY 6001 PETERS CREEK ROAD ROANOKE VA 24019 366-5215 GRACE 4 HLM 11-16 JOSEPH R. NAJJUM RT 11 BOX 264 ROANOKE VA 24019 977-2135 AUDREY 3 HLM 09-10 ALEXANDER M. NELSON II 4614 OORDELL DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 ~<<~~~ ~L 774-5079 ~ ~~~~ BETTY 3 J12-38 EDWARD G 0 OONNOR 3713 BORON ST ROANOKE VA 24012 ttitNk r c . r~v~c~uK 147 BOGEY LANE SALEM VA 24153 265 2490 JUDY 3 10-54 CHARLES R. MOODY 2138 SORRELL LANE, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 774-0141 ZELMA 3 06-35 ROBIN M. MURPHY 6022 PINEY WOOD RD. RINER VA 24149 h't-I i LL I F' M . MUIV I ANU 2501 MAYCREST ROANOKE VA 24012 362-4068 S 2 03-57 JOHN R. MORRIS 216 PAIRIE DANVILLE IL 61832 3 08-63 EDWARD R. HURRAY 3213 WINTERBERRY, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 703 382 7985 989-1950 S 3 OS-48 LINDA 3 10-23 ALFRED P. MUSCI EDWARD R. MYERS 3326 OVERHILL TRAIL, SW 760 FINNEY DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 VINTON VA 24179 774-9502 890-2762 M 4 08-50 PATRICIA 3 10-34 SAMUEL P. NACKLEY r FRED A. NAJJUM P.O. BOX 4764 1118 CAh~BELL AVE ROANOKE VA 24015 ~' ROANOKE VA 24016 ~~7 ~17~~ 343-2089 ~ _~___ -.----_______.._--- NORA 4 HLM 01-19 S 3 WILLIAM P. NAJJUM CARL J. NARO REV. P.O. BOX~594 631 N. JEFFERSON ST ROANOKE VA 24004 ROANOKE VA 24016 989-7807 INACTIVE 04-38 JAMES H JR NEUHOFF 134 24TH ST SE ROANOKE VA 24014 ~J~1~ `~~~SU~ 05-62 RICHARD A. NIGHTINGALE 18 GLENDALE MNR. GLENDALE WV 26038 344 0685 SHANNON 1 03-64 + REV. WILLIAM S. O'BRIEN 300 MAPLE AVE WAYNESBORO VA 22980 DONNA 3 EDWARD P. O'OONNER 3713 B01-ION STREET ROANOKE VA 24012 362 4034 362-4034 AVIS 2 10-38 TFD TO WAYNESBORO 3 H 3 05-63 GREGORY J. O'OONNER WILLIAM C. 223 27 9690 O' THOMAS F. O'DONNELL '300 POWELL DRIVE ~ ORDN~MAINT BN. 2ND PLTN 9310~REDBRIDGE ROAD TYLER TX 75703 CAMP LEJUENE NC 28542 RICHMOND VA 23236 804 320 7076 1 08-47 S 3 03-66 M 3 07-41 HARVEY J. O'KON MICHAEL F. O'MEARA BRIAN R. O'NEILL 8155 OTTERVIEW DRIVE, NW 6432 SUGAR RIDGE DRIVE 854 W.LINOOLN AVE ROANOKE VA 24019 ROANOKE VA 24018 PITTSBURGH PA 15233 366-1128 MYRTLE 3 05-30 SHAWN F O'NEILL 6177 BACK CREEK ROAD BOONES MILL VA 24065 989 8386 OTIS OCC~EN 17 14TH SW ROANOKE VA 24016 344-4514 MARTHA 4 03-26 FRED J. PALMER 6000 PINEY FOREST RD. RINER VA 24149 772-0673 SUSAN 2 11-41 TERRANCE O'SHAUGHNESSY 3038 WINTERBERRY DR ROANOKE VA 24018 989-3102 CAROLYN 3 04-56 PAUL S. OH 5914 DAIRY ROAD ROANOKE VA 24019 563 4221 DOROTHY 3 11-42 GEORGE J. PALMERIO 754 RAMADA RD. VINTON VA 24179 3 03-56 KEVIN P ODDO 6813 MASON KNOB TRAIL ROANOKE VA 24018 772 7057 ROBERT A. OTTAVIANI ~ ~~~~'" 3768-10 PARLIAMENT RD. ~ Y ~~ % ROANOKE VA 24014 ~,~,° y 5 y ~ ~~ ~~y ._ 345 1365 f___._------ i ~ . JAMES G. PAPPAS 2239 GRANDIN RD. ROANOKE VA 24015 703 228 6009 344 7917 982-1519 S 3 08-47 3 09-34 M 1 06-48 REV. JAMES E. PARKE PAUL F. PELTIER GEORGE D PEOPLES 314 TURNER ROAD 4329 GARST MILL RD.W B 6019 STEEPLECHASE DR SALEM VA 24153 ROANOKE VA 24018-6227 ROANOKE VA 24018 384-0491 342 5232 774 9446 2 HLM TFD TANYA 1 09-63 DEBORAH 3 08-45 MICHAEL A. PHELAN DONALD E. PIERCE ROBERT E. PIKE 2657 FOREST OAK DRIVE 1308 RUGBY BOULEVARD 1941- 69 BRAEBURN DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24017 SALEM VA 24153 977 1743 343-6591 KAREN 3 01-49 VIVAN 4 04-31 HARRY L. PIRONTO DUANE S. POHLMAN P.O. BOX 5073 4536 HAMPSHIRE DR ROANOKE VA 24012 RALEIGH NC 27613 772 1523 PAT HEATON 4 HLM O1- SHARON 1 02-64 ROBERT C. POOLE MATTHEW PC~-VELL -...v A-rc~ A'*~n~ n nn 774 1378 DOROTHEA 4 10-18 DENNIS B. POINDEXTER 2916 HOLLOWFILL AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24015 772 9421 1 10-52 SOOTT PRICE 366-6644 362-4015 366 9198 KATHERINE 4 PFN 12-29 BRISTOL OOUNCIL SHARON 3 07-62 ROANOKE CATHOLIC SCFIOOLS FRANK P. PROVENZANO LAWRENCE E. PTASCHEK 620 N. JEFFERSON ST 1202 PATTERSON AVR., SW 3522 HOLLAND DRIVE RONAOKE VA 24016 ROANOKE VA 24016 ROANOKE VA 24018 345-6528 989-6791 S 3 01-57 MARGARET 3 05-41 STANLEY H PUCKETT GEORGE E. JR. PUFKO 5179 LAKELAND DRIVE 3382-C RASMONT RD. ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 WILLIAM P. PULLANO PGK 1241 OLDSMAR AVENUE SPRING HILL FL 34608 989 1171 776-0107 LUCILLE 1 11-51 S 3 10-67 M 4 HLM 04-19 MICHAEL J QUINAN FRANCIS R. QUIST FRANK A RADOZYCKI 4 SUMMIT WAY 4733 BROOKWOOD DRIVE, SW 6491 CAREFREE LANE C-24 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24019 774 4362 774-8261 366 1517 ~~/a7 y~U S 01 07- INACTIVE 3 04-18 S 3 05-41 , PETER J. RAGONE RAMON L. RAMOS CHARLES J. REPEDE 1939 CAMBRIDGE AVENUE 3RD INFANTRY RD. 10513 BOTTOM CREEK DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24015 FT. LEVENWORTH KS 66027 BENT MOUNTAIN VA 24059 343-3378 929-4218 DRU 4 PFN HM 10-22 LYSET 3 11-56 ELAINE 1 05-49 KENNETH J. RENOIR II EDWARD E. RILEY 3RD LEWIS P. RIPLEY P.O. BOX 9 105 NIBLICK DRIVE MD OOPPER HILL VA 24079 SALEM VA 24153 3639 MUDLICK ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 703 651C8775 389-8761 774-6729 SHIRLEY 1 03-47 M 3 04-40 W 4 HLM 05-14 PRINCIPAL, ROANOKE CATHOL RICHARD W. ROBERS GILBERT O. ROBERTSON 620 N. JEFFERSON STREET 5259 FLINTLOCK ROADE 3011 KENNEDY STREET, NE ROANOKE VA 24016 ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24012 989-9573 366-8352 MARY JANE 3 08-42 4 HLM 06-09 LARRY ROBINSON JAMES G. ROWE TIMOTHY J. ROWE 3327 HEYWOOD AVE 707 BRANDON AVENUE 4532 VEST DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24018 345 2827 345-1255 989-9274 S 3 12-55 M 3 11-27 MAUREEN 4 12-63 CHRISTOPHER J. ROWLAND JOHN F. ROWLAND BRUCE R. ROY 5732 SANTA ANITA TERR. 5732 SANTA ANITA TERRACE 2221 LAUREL LANE ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24012 TROUTVILLE VA 24175 S 1 PAUL D. ROCKER 6707 PARKWAY DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 772-1633 NANCY 4 02-51 ROBERT W. SAGNETTE 5108 CAVE SPRING LANE ROANOKE VA 24018 774-1074 08- SUZANNE 4 09-49 WANDA 3 01-64 HARRY P. RUSSELL JOSEPH A. RUSSOMANO 5256 FLINTLOCK CIRCLE 4444 NORTHRIDGE STREER ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24012 989-8477 366-8349 1 EILEEN 3 09-29 3 HM 02-12 1 DANIEL F. SALAZAR V. J. SARTINI 3314 CIRCL BROOK DR. APT. 3638 HERITAGE ROAD, SW ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24015 989 7102 345-3638 S 1 03-63 KATHLEEN 4 HLM 11-20 FRANK A. SCHERREP REV LES M SCHMIDT 3613 BOND STREET, SW 1821 HOLTON ROANOKE VA 24018 BIG STONE GAP VA 24219 PEGGY 3 05-21 VALENTINO J. SARTINI 1912 MILLSTREAM DRIVE SALEM VA 24153 389-1216 BONNIE 3 02-50 BRIE-DAVID W SCHULTZ 5547 CYNTHIA DR SW ROANOKE VA 24018 989 8908 M 3 JEFFREY M. SCRIBNER 116 BAY VUE CIRCLE HARDY VA 24101 890 0315 989-6273 BETTY 4 03-32 CHARLES SCHWALLENBERG 2987 FOXCROFT DRIVE TALLAHASSEE FL 32308 703 523 1588 S 1 10-34 GREGORY J. SCRIBNER 630 APPLEWOOD STREET ROANOKE VA 24019 11-53 INACTIVE JAMES J. SEEDER 233 N.BOND ST. SALEM VA 24153 HOLLY 2 08-62 J. SOOTT SEXTON 803 LAKEVIEW ST SALEM VA 24153 389-1413 ANDREA 3 08-63 TIM S. SHELTON 3843 HUMMINGBIRD, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 989 3004 KAREN 4 01-56 MS. JANICE SHOBER 1741 DRIFTWOOD LANE ROANOKE VA 24018 344-6862 2 02-65 WILLIAM J. SEIDELL 3939 ST. JAMES CIRCLE ROANOKE VA 24018 986-0488 774-9647 S 1 03-49 ELEANOR 3 11-30 CHRISTOPHER E. SHEETS R. LYNWOOD SHELTON 6716 PARKWAY DR. SW 4808 EASTHILL DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 772-4684 774-3377 JENNIFER 4 11-58 CLAUDEEN 3 08-48 J. STEPHEN SHEPARD JOSEPH J. SHEPARD 418 FUGATE ROAD 7136 STONE MOUNTAIN ROAD ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 366-5818 JANICE 1 02-44 RICHARD B. SHORT 5512 NORTH GARDEN LANE ROANOKE VA 24019 772-2733 KAREN 3 09-45 SAMUEL S. SILEK 3008 DOVER ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 562-4823 BETH 3 04-58 772-2607 newu ~ ~^ ^^ JOSEPH SIMS THOMAS W. SKELLY EMIL SKIBINSKI 3312 PITTSFiELD STRREET 2402 AVENEL AVE. PGK ROANOKE VA 24017 ROANOKE VA 24015 27 MONROE TERRACE RADFORD VA 24141 366 5321 342-8124 CLEO 3 01-38 INACTIVE 09-37 4 PFN TFD-BLACK GEORGE K. SLOUGH FRANK N. SMALL ALFRED E. SMITH 1942 MONTCLAIR DRIVE 3704 BOWER ROAD, SW 1924 BELLEVILLE ROAD ROANOKE VA 24019 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 562-2249 774-8193 342-1280 CECILIA 3 10-31 JO ANN 4 PFN 08-28 JANE 3 10-28 MICHAEL D SMITH REV. RUSSELL E. SMITH JEFF SOBATAKA 3103 HONEYWOOD LN. - APT. POPE JOHN CENTER PGK 10015 ROANOKE VA 24014 186 FORBES ROAD 2843 CREEKWOOD DR BRAINTREE MA 02184 SALEM VA 24153 387-2199 375-2963 S 2 09-53 TFD TO 3548 4 HLM JOHN A. SPACEK RICHARD G. SPARKS ARNOLD L. SPEAKS 1601 RAYANNE DRIVE PGK 5533 DEERPARK DRIVE RICHMOND VA 23235 4707 PLAYER DRIVE, NE ROANOKE VA 24019 ROANOKE VA 24019 SG~cz/3~ 563-1387 56 1 12-46 BARBARA 4 PFN 06-35 M 3 01-51 JAMES R. SPECHT THOMAS D. SPOON SONNY SPORER 2112 BROOKFIELD DRIVE 2334 IDAVERE RD RT. 1 BOX 36-P ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 HENRY VA 24102 989-8212 CAROLYN 3 07-38 KENNETH J. SRPAN 2009 MONTCLAIR DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24019 366-4804 KIMBERLY 2 06-60 WILLIAM T: STACK 3523 FARMINGTON DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 ELEANOR 1 12-30 WENCIL M. STANEK 5402 CHATSWORTH DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24018 562 0954 989-0764 989-9339 M 1 11-45 ROSINA 3 03-42 MARY 4 09-27 GREGORY D. STEPHENS MARK A. STEVENSON REV KENNETH G STOFFT P.O. BOX 81 01 3534 VIEW AVE. 2505 ELECTRIC ROAD ROANOKE VA 24014 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 772 7884 774-0947 774 0066 D 3 02-59 CARMELLA 1 02-50 S 1 HLM 04-47 JEFFERY M. STUMP PAUL A. STUMP RICHARD W. STUMP 3597 COLONY LANE 2270 MEMORIAL AVE. 2103 GRANDIN ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24015 989-9328 344 5480 342-8495 MAUREEN 4 01-57 ANGELA 3 10-65 DEBRA 4 06-53 PGK PSD 932 WASENA AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 342-7373 JEANNE 4 PFN 09-29 RAYMOND E. SWEENEY 5415 SWEET FERN ROANOKE VA 24019 616 RED FOX LANE PGK EASTON PA 18042 2622 MONTGOMERY AVE. ROANOKE VA 24015 774-7034 MARGARET 3 HLM 09-13 CHRIS 4 10-53 DAVID R. SYKES FRANK A SYKES 1660 N. STREET - RT. 741 1660 N SR 741 LEBANON OH 45036 LEBANON OH 45036 4 3 STEPHEN M. SYKES ANTHONY SZWAST JOHN J. TAETZ 12845 STANDING BEAR 402 BONHILL DR. 7203 MT. CHESTNUT ROAD APPLE VALLEY CA 92307 ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24018 619 247 9438 366-8402 989-3243 NAM THI 4 06-53 M 1 11-6 JANE 2 02-31 STEVENN J. TALEVI JOE D. TAYLOR SYLVESTER F. TAYLOR 2725 MALLARD DRIVE, SW 3310 CHRISTIAN AVE., NW 4102 OAKLAND BLVD., NW ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24012 ROANOKE VA 24012 989-1302 366-0439 366-9294 M 4 06-57 FRANCES 4 HLM 07-18 MARY 4 04-25 JAMES P. TELFORD CHARLES P. THEIMER ROBERT G. THEIMER JR. 1007 PHILLIPS STREET 6620 SHINGLE RIDGE RT. 2 BOX 98 TAYLOR PA 18517 ROANOKE VA 24018 FINCASTLE VA 24090 1 03-49 RICHARD W. THIBAULT 6384 SPRING RUN DR. ROANOKE VA 24018 774 6241 INACTIVE 12-42 A VICTOR THOMAS 1301 ORANGE AVE ROANOKE VA 24012 INACTIVE 05-31 J E DORN THOMAS 1809 ELMART LANE RICHMOND VA 23235 772 4312 345 4120 804 745 1754 M 2 06-39 M 1 OS-30 DECOKES 3 02-31 LOWELL E. THOMAS FRANK D. THOMPSON JOE H. THOMPSON 1421 ARCHIBALD AVE. 4402 KIRKWOOD DRIVE, SW 4402 KIRKWOOD DRIVE, SW ROANOKE VA 24017 ROANOKE VA 24018 ROANOKE VA 24018 344 4066 989-3289 989-3289 S 3 06-32 M 4 01-63 LORAINE 4 09-32 LARRY G. THOMPSON JOHN L. THOMPSON JR. ROBIN L. THURMOND 623 HIGHLAND AVE 1107 BRANDON AVE., SW 1912 ABERDEEN AVE. ROANOKE VA 24013 ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24018 343 0336 342-8675 774-1231 S 1 06-57 KATHRYN 2 04-47 GENEVIVE 4 HLM 01-09 PAUL A. TIMKO JOSEPH W. TOTI ANTHONY M TRICARICO 5203 GOLDEN CIRCLE 4719 EAST HILL DRIVE 3226 WOODVIEW RD. 977 2107 989-0385 989 5849 IRENE 4 07-23 JEAN 4 06-30 SYLVIA 3 03-45 CARL A. TRIPPEER JAMES O. TROUT JOHN P. TROUT 2402 LABURNUM AVE. 2102 STEPHENSON AVE. 797 OOTTON BAY DR.#1002 ROANOKE VA 24015 ROANOKE VA 24014 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33406 343-2587 RITA 4 08-31 HERMAN S. TURK JR. 318 FELSTED CT. STERLING VA 22170 345-6353 M 3 04-30 ROBERT P. VANKERCHOVE 6818 MASON KNOB TRAIL ROANOKE VA 24018 989-9779 S 3 07-58 RICHARD D VITULLO 2503 CRESTON AVE SW ROANOKE VA 24015 703 444 5239 989-2755 LYNN 3 OS-57 BERTIE 4 PFN PETER J. VOORHIS DERRY R. WADDELL PGK 1628 SHAMROCK STREET 2611 MONTGOMERY AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24017 ROANOKE VA 24015 774-1129 563-9587 GINNY 4 04-51 ANDREW J. WALDIS PGK 3511 PINEVALE ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 774-3219 W 4 PFN HLM 01-08 STEVEN E. WATERMAN 3464 OOLONIA AVE. #S-144 ROANOKE VA 24018 776 0078 DONNA 1 OS- JOHN C. WEBS 3895 WINESAP RD. ROANOKE VA 24019 a` 992 6518 LINDA 3 ~~ 08-54 .. _ -_ _ "WARREN E. WHITE 5112 NORSEMAN DR. ROANOKE VA 24019 562 1370 GLORIA 1 W. THOMAS WILLARD 5461 WINTERSET DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24014 989 7439 03- S 3 05-51 RICHARD L. WADDELL 2216 BRANDON AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24015 343-9239 MARY JO 3 08-50 RAYMOND M. WALTER PGK RT. 2 BOX 344 HARDY VA 24101 343-1098 ROSALIN 3 10-41 JAMES P. WATERS PGK 5259 AVIATION DRIVE ROANOKE VA 24012 366 0959 INACTIVE 4 JOHN T WEST 1105 CHRISTY CR SALEM VA 24153 DEBBIE 3 12-43 MICHAEL E WARNER 4914 BUCKHORN ROAD ROANOKE VA 24018 989-0463 CAROLYN 2 04-35 THOMAS J. WATERS 341 KING GEORGE AVE., SW ROANOKE VA 24016 344-9090 NORMA 3 12-36 ROBERT A. WHITE 5351 SUNDANCE ROAD SALEM VA 24153 387-9129 380 4002 MARTHA ANNE 3 03-62 M 3 12-56 GARY F. WHITLEY THEODORE S. WIERZBIC 3770 KNOLLWOOD RD 961 STARMOUNT AVE. TROUTVILLE VA 24175 ROANOKE VA 24019 977-9511 366-4817 04-5 BONNIE 3 02-46 SANDRA 3 12-43 ROBERT O. WILLS 2648 YORK DR.3 DALEVILLE VA 24083 JOSEPH H. WILSON 1116 MARSHVIEW COURT - 46 VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23451 JW'ICJ I LMVVI~CRJ w~a~ ~ rrr . ~ i ^ ~..~~~ ~ - .., 989-2789 992-5094 MARY 3 08-57 JANE 3 804 491 8004 04-39 SHIRLEY 4 PFN 06-37 IVAN H. WINSTON 608 ALLISON AVE - # 2 HARRY N. WITHERS JOHN J. WtZOREK . ROANOKE VA 24016 5734 THORN ROSE RD. ROANOKE VA 24012 6525 C~2EENWAY DRIVE, NW - ROANOKE VA 24019 345 0402 366 2891 M 1 11-47 S 4 563 5578 08-28 3 02-45 AMBROSE W. WOOD JR. H CARLYLE WOODY PGK 5351 OLD SESSLER MILL RD 1920 BURNT RIDGE RD.#404 1406KWRCAMPBELLIA~VTE #2 TROUTVILLE VA 24175 LYNCHBURG VA 24503 ROANOKE VA 24016 992-2603 ;~° ~':~' ~ ~ ~~"'`~` FREDA 4 12-44 804 384 5907 FRANCES 3 , 342 3754 HLM OS-09 S 4 07- A GARY YAMINE ARTURO YBANEZ 5753 PENQUIN ROANOKE VA 24018 757 ESTATES ROAD SE GARY R YECK 118 HILLSIDE DR ROANOKE VA 24014 . OXFORDSPRINGS MS 38655 772-2969 JEANNE 3 12-55 PAUL W. YENGST P.O. BOX 2525 ROANOKE VA 24011 772-0196 MARY LYNN 4 06-56 GLENN L. ZIPFEL 911 CAMDEN HILL CT LAWRENCEVILLE GA 30245 427-0955 REGOLITA 4 04-35 JOHN J. ZACHARIAS 209 REDHEAD ROAD R i CF~P10ND VA 23235 804 320 2678 3 01-38 SHELIA 4 06-45 GUISEPPI F. ZANGARI 100 KIMBALL AVE. - J, SALEM VA 24153 387-2593 3 03-36 FRANCES 1 09-43 -~ i 1,, , l .. ~~_ ~ .. ._ ~ ~ ! ~. ~ +s. ' j 7 1 ~,~~ <~, ~ ~ -,. ~: ~ ~. ~ 1 I ~,~ ~°,~~ . K S. MASON CARBAUGH ~~ ~ =~~ /~ Commissioner DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND COMMERCE P. O. BOX 1163, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 - Decembth.8d, 1919 n tic. tt~;cha~ae a. SeL~anca, Ezaeattve tlf~rec-,tox ghtb a ~ Co.Cuaabu,~ 283D :Ean~uload Road It~EdCo~,h;€rlu~, V.E~.i,niac 2 311 ~ , Deck Mac. IieL~aiiea.s Thf,~ uci.Ct con~.i~cnr ~ as yours carllp~eted Fonnl ifl0-G, and a~~100 Xean unrl¢Jc Section S7-b0 (aj, "Civic O~tganc.za~tiana" ~i.an 57-60 (aj ~ gox~KnigJ~~+~ Co.CumE,uaga~nd ~© 4~ co ,an under See- ~tS~ ~v~-e~irtg comp~e~ed ~a~url 100-G and ~a~c~l 100-X, yaws acgani.zcrtion and 4? eoune.F.~e have been ~aund ~a be exee~aC sham ~h¢. ~9~~atian c~.iat¢nlerst,~, a~ Secti.an 5y-49 and the ne~trvl:2nen~ ag Sec- fiton S7-S3 0~ ~h¢ V.t~cgi.rua So.G1.eita~,i.an a~ Ccrn~bu~iona Lace. Thin ezea>p~.ti.an ahctGt ne~a,ix..i.,i. c~~eca; urr~i.@ ouch ~.%me as youk ~.t Grog a~rtcea may chaKge. In the everst Fan»1 100-G .t.~ r>:o .eangen ap~<a~,i,cab.Le, pteuae carratae~ a~sice .cns~ediclteLy ao ghat we may aaaia~ you .c.rc exp¢diti.ng yours co~roGia~ces? ati.th .the Law. The .iaauanee o~ ex¢mp~.Loa daea not cana~.itute an endona ement b y #~ Conmwr~vea.P.th a ~ V.uigu~.ta on b y .any o ~ .ita depa~rt- ~+zta, aa~ea o~ elr~ayee~ o~ .the ,7urcpcae o~c ,~e~orc roK~a~:~r ,~,~ ~i.ib aoticitart.Lon ran doea exemp~ian tom •.the .State, hegte~tion p~taceaa ~.eLLeve you o d ..#he° a~eapo»a.i.bi,Gity o 6 cal>~ycng ; .tarcaC ~.icena.ing ~co~l<dwtee. A copy a~ ~h~a: ezel~~zti.on aha,Gt ct,~ea be on {~ with each a~~.i-[.l~tate .inc,~uded -tn the canaoli.da~ed nepo~tt., I~ .tlli,~ as~i.ce Bart be a~ ~w~theri aaa.Latareee, pteaae do na# hew5.ita~e ato eontaet ub a.t (804j 18b-1343, SincUce,Ly, J. A. I~anana, Jn. Goonriinatan Chvc.<.tctb.@e Sa.@~~rorus JAk~: rn~c ~!~p ~~r~l;;;ill~~0'•~(I~li~ (ii)I~ I'.~~~~.~ r~~~f~J~l~~[~J ~' 4 phone Contact: Robett Lawton Phone Number: (202) 964-3673 internal Revenue Service f)ata: In reply refer fo: MAR 19 191'4 _ DO 04 EIN 06 0416470 Office f Columbus Supreme c c/o Harold J. Lamboley Columbus Plaza New Haven, Connecticut 0650? Gentlemen: This refers to your letter dated February 26, 1974 concerning the type of exemption you hold currently. You are currently exempt under section 501(c)(8) under a group ruling initially issued in 1940. This group ruling covers local councils whose names you have .~ submitted as your subordinates. We are sending a copy of this letter to your key District Director, Boston, Massachusetts. Sincerely yours, ~ ~ ~~~~ Milton Cerny Chief, Rulings Section 1 Exempt Organizations Branch KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS SUPREME OFFICE • COLUMBUS PLAZA • NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06507 TO WHOM YT MAY CONCERN: RE: FEDERAL INCOME TAX EXEMPT STATUS Council No. 562 - A Knights of Columbus subordinate Council Instituted: April 21, 1901 This certifies that the above Council was duly constituted a Knights of Columbus subordinate Council at its institution and is now an active Council in good .standing. This Council is included as a Knights of Columbus subordinate Council under a group exemption ruling from the Internal Revenue Service initi- ally issued in 1940, exempting it from Federal Income Tax pursuant to Section 501(c)(a). The attached are-true copies of the most recent supplemental rulings received regarding this exemption. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS / '/ ~~:, ~ W. Patrick Don in Supreme Advocate WPD/msb b w Laws and Rules Governing the Fourth Degree of the Knights of Columbus October 1987 • Laws and Rules Governing the Fourth Degree of the Knights of Columbus ARTICLE I BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The supreme power and control over the Fourth Degree. including the making, amending and changing of all laws, rules and regulations concerning the same, is vested in the Board of Directors. The officers herein designated shall be subject to the Board of Directors. ARTICLE II SUPREME ASSEMBLY Section 2. A Board of Government for the Fourth Degree is hereby established. It shall be known as the Supreme Assem- .. bly of the Fourth Degree. Section 3. Who compose. The Supreme Assembly shall be composed of the Supreme Master, the Supreme Knight, the Supreme Secretary, and the duly appointed Vice Supreme Masters of the Fourth Degree. Section 4. Meetings. The Supreme Assembly shall meet whenever a meeting thereof is authorized by the Board of Directors. The time and place of such meeting shall be fixed by the Board of Directors. Section 5. Duties. It shal] be the duty of the Supreme Assembly tp give careful consideration to all matters concerning the welfare of the Fourth Degree. Section 6. Powers. . The Supreme Assembly shall have power to recommend to he Board of Directors amendments to or repeal of all laws, les and regulations for the government, management, discipline and control of the Fourth Degree, its members and , of the Supreme, Provincial, District and other Assemblies thereof. ~~}- `' Section ?. For attendance at Supreme Assembly meetings. the members of that body shall receive mileage at the rate of 15 cents a mile round trip between the place of residence and the nearest airport plus round trip airfare to the airport nearest the place of meeting, and per diem of $300.00 a day for each day's actual attendance at said meeting. ARTICLE III OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME ASSEMBLY Section 8. The Supreme Master shall: (a) Be appointed by the Board of Directors for a term of one year, unless sooner removed by the Board for cause. In the event of a vacancy in. the office of Sup nt a Supreme Master cause, the Board of Directors shall appo for the remainder of the term. The term of the Supreme Master shall commence on September 1 of each year. (b) Exercise administrative authority in the Fourth Degree and shall preside at meetings of the Supreme Assembly. (c) Be charged with general supervision over all the officers and assemblies herein provided for. (d) Make detailed report with such recommendations as to and to the Board of Directors whenevererequirede Assembly (e) Have the right, at any time, to make official visitations when he considers the same necessary for the best interests of basisof actual expend lures shall be payable outof tthe Fourth Degree Fund. lications for (f) Have the right to grant dispensations in app membership in proper cases for good and sufficient cause but only at the written request of the Master of the District. (g) Attend the regular quarterly meetings of the Board of Directors, and special meetings if so directed by the Supreme Knight, and to make full report of all Fourth Degree matters requiring action by the Board. (h) Appoint a Master for each District. (i) Keep a record of dispensations granted or refused. Section 9. The Supreme Secretary of the Knights of Colum- busshall bathe Supreme Secretary of the Fourth Degree anc~ of the Supreme Assembly with like powers and duties. Section 10. There shall be a Vice Supreme Master, for each duly established Province of the Fourth Degree, who shall: -l 4 }- o_~ ~ ~ ~ (a) Be appointed by the Board of Directors for a two-year term to commence on September 1 of odd numbered years. (b) Have administrative power and be the head of the Fourth Degree in his Province, subject in Fourth Degree matters to the Supreme Master and the Board of Directors. (c) Have general supervision over Masters and assemblies and exemplifications in his Province. (d) Examine thesemi-annual financial reportsof Mastersof his Province and have authority, when he deems it necessary, to audit or cause to be audited the books, accounts and statements of any such Masters. (e) Make detailed written report to the Supreme Master annually on the general condition of the Fourth Degree in his Province, said report to be provided to the Supreme Master by August 15. , (f) With the approval of the Supreme Master make official visitations within his own Province when he considers the same necessary for the best interests of the Fourth Degree. The expense of such visitations shall be payable from the Fourth Degree Fund on a basis of actual expend itures but not to exceed the prevailing rate of mileage set by the Board. (g) Recommend to the Supreme Master and Board of Directors the creation or dissolution of Assemblies. (h) Approve the dates of exemplifications held in his Province and notify the Supreme Master and Supreme Secretary of their approval. ARTICLE IV PROVINCES AND PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLIES Section 11. The Order shall be divided by the Board of Directors into a4 many Provinces ag the Board deems ad- visable. The Board shall designate a name for each Province. Section 1'l. Whenever the Supreme Master and the Board of nirectors shall deem the same advisable, necessary or ex- >edient, there shall be a meeting of all Masters in any or all 'rovinces for the consideration of Fourth Degree matters; said' mcetin~; shall be known as a Provincial Assembly. No ullcrnates shall be permitted. On receipt of notice from the Supreme Secretary under seal of the Urder that such meeting has been declared advisable, necessary or expedient as above -{ 6 }- a provided, the V ice Supreme Master shall call the meeting, but not otherwise. The meeting shall be held on some day in the first month after the meeting of the Supreme Assembly, the time and place to be designated by the Vice Supreme Master. The Vice Supreme Master and Masters of the Province shall receive, in lieu of expenses, for attendance at a Provincial Assembly meeting, mileage one way at the rate of thirty cents a mile for the first fifteen hundred miles and twenty cents a mite for each additional mile from place of residence to place of meeting and per diem of one hundred dollars for each day's actual attendance at the meeting of the Provincial Assembly, these payments to be made from the Fourth Degree Fund. All recommendationsadnpted by said Provincial Assembly shall be transmitted to the Supreme Secretary by the Vice Supreme Master. ARTICLE V DISTRICTS AND DISTRICT ASSEMBLIES Section 13. Districts. Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, each Province shall be divided by the Supreme Master into as many districts as, from time to time, he may deem necessary for the proper functioning of the Fourth Degree. Section 14. District Assemblies. District Assemblies shall: (a) Be composed of the Faithful Navigator of each Assembly in the District and one delegate for each one hundred members or major fraction thereof of each Assembly which delegates shall be elected by ballot at the February meeting in the year in which such district assembly is convened and after prior notice of the holding of such election has been given to the members by notice or publication. Assemblies shall have the right to elect alternates for the Faithful Navigator and for any; delegates to which they may be entitled. ' (b) Be presided over by the Master of the District, who shall be a member of and entitled to a vote in the District Assembly. (c) Meet biennially at the call of the Master during thc~ months of March or April in the even numbered years, after due notice of the meeting has been given to the Supreme Master, Supreme Secretary and the Vice Supreme.Ma.4ter, and provided the session does not conflict with the State Council Meeting. A quorum shall consist of at least one-third ~6j~ of the delegates entitled to membessl~+p. i~District Assembly. _. ~ . (d) Guard the welfare of the Fourtl--Begree mthe tact and consider and act upon all matters. of est. ~ the membership and consonant with the purposes o_!' Ll~e degree. (e) Elect an auditing committee of t->nes~er~; ~uvhich shall audit the March 1 and September l~aniei~reports of ~he Master to be submitted to the Supreme Secrel~y and Vice 'upreme Master, and certify by their signa~eires on said reports that they have audited and found them:correct. (f) Adhere to the following order of business at said meeting: 1. Call to Order. - 2. Appointment of Pilot, Inside Sentinel, Outer Sentinel and Secretary of the meeting. - 3. Certification of the Traveling Csrd. - 4. Prayer. (a) Pledge of Allegiance or Nationt~ A~nth~m. 5. Appointment of Committee on Credentials. 6. Appointment of Committee on Resolutions. 7. Report of Committee on Credentials. 8. Reading of Minutes. 9. Communications. 10. Report of Master. 11. Report of Committee on Resolutions. 12. Unfinished Business. ~ 13. New Business. 14. Selection of three recommendations for Master. lb. Election of Master's audit committee. 16. Prayer. i ~ Section Ili. Asgemblicw shall pay the expense9: of their representatives and delegates to District Assembly~neetings. -{7~ { The Master's expenses for attending the District Assembly meeting shall be payable from the Master's Fund. Section 16. It shall be the duty of the Master immediately after the meeting of the District Assembly to send a transcript of the proceedings to the Vice Supreme Master and Supreme Secretary. ARTICLE VI MASTERS-APPOINTMENT, TERM, POWERS. DIJTIE3 Appointment. Section 17(a). The Master of each District shall be appointed by the Supreme Master. The District Assembly at each regular biennial meeting may select by ballotfrom the Fourth Degree membership in the District three recommendations and forward them to the Supreme Master for his considera- tion. The Master shall reside in the District and when he changes residence therefrom, the Supreme Master shall declare the office vacant and appoint a successor from the membership in the District for the unexpired term. Whenever a vacancy occurs in the office for any other reason, the Supreme Master shall fill the vacancy from the membership in the District. Term. (b) All Masters shall be appointed for terms expiring September 1 in even-numbered years. They shall hold office until a successor has been appointed, but at all times at the pleasure of the Supreme Master or the Board of Directors. (c) All funds identified with the Master's position and which come into his possession shall be forthwith deposited in a bank in a separate account in the name of the Master with the words "Master, Knights of Columbus Fourth Degree" added to each account. Said funds shall be held separate and distinct from the personal accounts of the Master, and certificates from banks covering balances may be required at any time ~ in connection with the examination of the financial reports o~ Masters. (d) The Master shall be bonded by the Board of Directors in the sum of $10,000.00. The cost of the same shall be paid from the Fourth Degree Fund. .(g}- Duties and Powers. (e) The Master shall keep a permanent record of all exemplifications and of all financial transactions in a book to be provided by the Supreme Office and which, together with all funds, other property and effects of the degree, shall be transmitted to his successor. (f) Masters shall on the fi rst day of March and September of each year make a detailed financial report and statement on forms furnished by the Supreme Secretary, forwarding a copy thereof to the Supreme Secretary, Supreme Master and Vice 1-Supreme Master. Said report shall be approved and signed by ~7the auditing committee of three members elected by the District Assembly at its last preceding regular meeting, provided, that where no District Assembly meeting has been held, said report shall be approved and signed by an auditing committee of three members elected by the Assembly of which the Master is a member. The books and accounts of Masters shall be subject to audit at any time by the Supreme Secretary upon order of the Supreme Master. (g) It shall be the duty of each Master on the first day of March and September each year to remit to the Supreme Secretary all Fourth Degree funds in his hands in excess of two thousand dollars for deposit in the Fourth Degree Fund to be used for the general purposes of said Fund. Failure of the Master to promptly comply with the provisions of the section shall subject him to removal from office by the Supreme Master. (h) The Master may declare any office in an Assembly vacant where the officer fails or refuses to perform the duties of the office, and the vacancy shall be filled after notice to the members by election at the meeting next succeeding the creation of the vacancy. (i) Masters shall annually, on or before August 15th of each year, report to the Supreme Secretary, Supreme Master and Vice Supreme Master information relative to Assemblies in their districts on forms to be furnished by the Supreme Secretary. (j) Each Mastershall remit to the Supreme Secretary within thirty days:ifter initiation, seven dollars foreach candidate up one hundred, eight dollars for each candidate in excess of e hundred and up to two hundred, nine dollars for each eandid:~tc in exces4 of two hundred and up to three hundred, ten dollars for each candidate in excess of three hundred and ul~ to tour hundred, eleven dollars for each candidate in excessof --(9)- four hundred and up to five hundred, twelve dollars for each candidate in excess of five hundred. These funds shall be delivered to the Supreme Treasurer and shall be kFundy The in a separate fund known as the Fourth Degree Fund shall be used to pay the expenses of the Supreme Assembly and of the officers constituting the same, the expenses of meetings of Provincial Assemblies in the manner provided in Article IV, Section 12, and for such other purposes as may be determined by the Board of Directors. Withdrawals from the Fourth Degree Fund shall be made in the same manner as withdrawals from the General Fund of the Order. (k) Upon the termination of office of any Master, whether said term shall terminate by expiration thereof or for some other reason, the Master shall turn over to his successor all assets, books, records, and paraphernalia of the District to be accomplished in conjunction with an audit by the Vice Supreme Master. (1) Within thirty days after each initiation the Master shall forward to the Supreme Secretary a detailed report setting forth the date and place of the initiation, the name, address and council number of each applicant, and a statement as to those who were initiated. He shall send with said report the applications of all candidates who were initiated, with a certification on each application of the fact of such initiation. A copy of said report shall be furnished to the Vice Supreme Master. (m) The Master shall certify to the Faithful Navigators of Assemblies from which members have been initiated into the Fourth Degree, the names of such members, together with date of initiation. When a Master initiates a candidate from a district other than his own, he shall certify to the Master of the candidate's district and to the Faithful Navigator of the candidate's assembly, the name of such member and date of initiation. ' (n) Pending the formation of an Assembly, any member of the Fourth Degree unaffiliated with an Assembly shall be attached to some Assembly in the district by order of the Master, or, if more convenient to a nearby assembly in an adjoining district, with the consent of the Master of such adjoining district, to which he shall pay dues and in which he shall have all the rights of membership, until the formation of an assembly in his own council. - --(10}- .• (o) The Master of the Fourth Degree shall have full control and supervision of all the arrangements and preparation for the exemplification of the degree and he shall be held strictly responsible therefor. The Master shall be held personally responsible for the expenses of the exemplification and must keep same within the fees received by him from the applicants and the controls set forth by the Board of Directors. He must not in any way bind the Order or make any contracts in its name. He receives all fees amply in advance and should be ready to meet all obligations he incurs. (p) Unless otherwise authorized by the Supreme Master, the Fourth Degree shall be exemplified at least once ayear in each District, after notice to and upon approval by theVice Supreme Master of the Province. ARTICLE VII ASSEMBLIES Section 18. How Established. (a) The Fourth Degree members in an area may form an Assembly by requesting the Masterof that District to petition the Vice Supreme piaster to recommend to the Supreme Master and the Board of Directors the creation of the same. (b) The proposed name of an Assembly shat l be approved by the Board of Directors. An Assembly shall not bear the name of a living person. (c) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, ap- plicants and members may make application to or be mem- bers of any Assembly of.their choice. (d) Whenever the Rood of the Order so requires, a Vice Supreme Master may dis.4olve an Assembly. When such action is taken, the Vice Supreme Master shall attach the Fourth ~DeRree members of such dissolved Assembly to some existing Assembly, or he may create a new Assembly by combining the Fourth 1)c~c memlrerv of the disurlved Asgemlrly with the I•'ourth I)eQree members of some council orcouncils in nearby and adjacent towns. A Vice Supreme Master may also, -(11)- V whenever the good of the Order so requires, transfer the Fourth Degree members of one or more councils from one Assembly to another. but all such transfers shall be made in such a manner that an Assembly will be made up of Fourth Degree members of councils in nearby and adjacent towns. (e) Each council of the Knights of Columbus shall be affiliated with an assembly of the Fourth Degree. Section 19. Granting of Charter. No assembly shalLcome into existence until official approval of the Board of Directors has been issued to the Master of the District. Upon notification of this approval, the Supreme Secretary shall prepare the charter for the new assembly. Section 20. Meetings. Assemblies shall hold regular meetings once each month at such time and place as the assembly may determine. Special meetings may be called on five days' written or published notice by the Faithful Navigator, at his instance, or by the Faithful Captain on request of ten members, upon like notice. Section 21. By-Laws and Dues. (a) Each Assembly may adopt such by-laws as it deems necessary, providing they do not conflict with the laws and rules of the Order, or with the laws and rules for the government of the Fourth Degree. Any by-laws or amend- ments adopted by an Assembly must be approved by the Supreme Advocate before they can become operative. (b) Assemblies shall determine the amount of dues and they shall be the same for all members. The amount shall not be l~.g than three dollars per year. In the absence ofany by-law to the contrary, assembly dues shall be levied from the first of January for the calendar year. Dues shall be levied against a candidate for the Fourth Degree as of the date of thc~ exemplification. . (c) No assessment by an Assembly shall be vali geuand approved by the Supreme Master, both as to purpo. amount. -(12}- 1. w - Section 22.Order of Business. The following shall form the order of business and the procedure of regular business meetings of each assembly: 1. Call to Order. 2' pj~ ~n of pjtegiance or Sa ute ~ Flagard, Prayer and Se 3. Roll Call of Officers. 4. Reading of Minutes. ~ !i. Report of Faithful Friar. 6 Reading of Bills and Communications. ?. Report of Faithful Comptroller. 8. Report of Faithful Purser. 9. Report of Committees. 10. Reading of Applicationsafterreferral tothe Admission Committee. 11. Balloting. 12. Unfinished Business. 13. Report of Trustees. 14. New Business. 15. Good of the Order. 16. Closing Ceremonies. ARTICLF. VIII ASSEMBLY OFFICERS AND DUTIES Section 23. Election of Officers. Each Assembly shall elect a Faithful Navigator, a Faithful Captain, a Faithful Pilot, a Faithful Comptroller, a Faithful Scribe, a Faithful Purser. Faithful Inner and Outer Sentinels. a Faithful pclmiral and three Trusteesg. The Faithful Navi- }tator, Faithful (%al-~nt ~a priest Ito dart asl Faithful Friar~lor shall annually al~po Chaplain but such selection must be made in accordance with any rules established by the bishop of the diocese in which the assembly is located. The Faithful Admiral shall be chosen from the fast Faithful Navigators of the assembly, if any there be. -{I31- I Section 24. Duties of Assembly Officers. (a) The Faithful Navigator shall: Preside Over Meetings. 1. Preside at all meetings of his assembly and shall enforce the rules and regulations of the assembly and the laws of the Order, and shall be Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Appoint Committees. 2. Appoint committees in addition to the permanent com-~ mittees provided by the laws of his assembly as he may deem proper or as may be directed by the assembly, and he shall be a member ex-0fficio of all committees. Countersign Orders. 3. Countersign orders drawn and signed by the Faithful Comptroller for the payment of money when the same have been ordered by the assembly or approved by the Board of Trustees. Countersign Checks. 4. Countersign checks drawn and signed by the Faithful Purser. Other Duties. 5. Perform such other duties as the Supreme Assembly may impose. (b) The Faithful Captain shall: 1. In the absence of the Faithful Navigator perform the duties and exercise the powers.of the Faithful Navigator. It is also the responsibility of the Faithful Captain in order to assure a good attendance at meetings and other functions of the assembly to take direct charge of all activities social and otherwise under that portion of the order of business known as the Good of the Order. (c) The Faithful Pilot shall: Present at Meetings. , ''~ 1. Be present at all meetings of his assembly. Charge of Properties. 2. Have charge of all properties of the assembly execpt moneys and accounts and record books of the officers but including ceremonials. -(14}- ~, Responsible for Chamber. 3. Be responsible for the arrangement of the assembly chamber. • Responsible for Sentinels. 4. Direct and be responsible for the activities of the Inner and Outer Sentinels. (d) The Faithful Comptroller shall: ~ ~~, Maintain Records. 1. Keep a roll of the members. their age, occupation and residence with the date of their initiation in the Fourth ~ Degree. Collect and Receive Moneys. 2. Collect and receive all moneys due the assembly and all funds obtained from any source and transfer the same to the Faithful Purser and obtain areceipt from that o),'ficer. Standard System of Accounting. 3. Keep account of the charges and receipts of each member in accordance with the standard accounting system Provided by the Supreme Council. Make Available Records and Accounts. 4. Make available to the Faithful Navigator and Board of Trustees at least once a year all mofmbe aring the offic'-al financial accounts for the purpose pr P audit. Draw Order on Faithful Purser. b. Draw all orders on the Faithful Purser when so ordered by the assembly, the Board of Trustees or the Faithful Navigator for payment of alt claims of demands against his aSSeml~ly .which orders shall be signed by him and counter- signed by the b'aithful Navigator. lscue Membership Card. f. Issue to each member not indebted to the assembly a Fourth Uegree Membership Card duly signed and attested (,~ but such card shall be issued only if the member p~ ~ingiri Thirci Ucgree Membership Card showing his good his Council. I'rovicle Master and Financial Secretary with Names of Candidates. -(16)- 7. Notify the District Master of the names of all candidatx~ from his assembly awaiting initiation and give written notice ~ to the Financial Secretary of the council to which such member belongs that the member has been accepted as a Fourth Degree member of the assembly. Provide Supreme Secretary and Financial Secretary with Names of Members Suspended. Died, etc. 8. Notify promptly the Supreme Secretary, Master and Financial Secretary of the council concerned of the death. transfer, withdrawal. suspension, expulsion, reinstatement, readmission or transfer of members on the forms provided by the Supreme Assembly. Custodian of Seal. 9. Be the custodian of the seal of the assembly and affix same to all proper papers. Other Duties. 10. Perform all other acts required by the lawsof the Fourth Degree, the Order and the rules of -the Board of Directors. (e) The Faithful Scribe shall: Maintain Record of Meetings. 1. Keep a true record of the doings of his assembly upon books approved by the Board of Directors and furnished by the Supreme Secretary at the expense of the assembly. Conduct Correspondence. 2. Conduct all correspondence of the assembly and perform such other duties as the assembly or the Order may direct. (f) The Faithful Purser shall: Custodian of Funds. 1. Be the custodian of all funds of the assembly obtained from any source by or through any person or persona, acting for or in the name of the assembly or under its direction or authority. Receive Moneys. etc. .. 2. At each meeting of the assembly. receive frorp the Faithful Comptroller alt moneys whatever received by said Comptroller at such meeting, or between meetings, and shall -(161~ give a written receipt to such Comptroller therefor, specifying the fund to which the same shall be credited. The moneys so received by such Purser shall be forthwith deposited by said Purser to the credit of the assembly in an approved bank or other secure institution of deposit, subject to approval of the Board of Trustees or majority vote of the assembly. He shall obtain vouchers or certificates of deposit therefor, and report the same at the next regular meeting of ~~ the assembly. Pay Orders. 3. Pay all orders drawn on him which are signed by the Faithful Comptroller and counter-signed by the Faithful Navigator. All such orders shall have the approval of the Board of Trustees, except demands of the Supreme Council, initiation fees due the District Master. the regular and usual stated payments of the assembly and payments authorized by the assembly as provided~in Section 24(k). Keep Accounts. 4. Keep separate accounts of the moneys placed in his hands by his assembly or the officers thereof and be ready at all times to plainly show the amount of moneys in the funds of the assembly, the dates. of receiving and disbursing same; such accounts to be kept in books furnished by the Supreme Secretary to said Purser at the expense of the assembly. 5. Make available to the Board of Trustees his books and records for the purpose of preparing the annual audit. (g) Sentinels. Verification of Membership Card. 1. The Faithful loner and Outer Sentinels are specifically entrusted with the responsibility of seeing that all in at- tendance at an assembly function are in possession of both a Third and Fourth Degree Membership Card and so report to the Faithful Pilot. Other Duties. 2. They shall perform such other duties as may be imposed upon them by the Faithful Pilot. Make Records Available. (h) The Faithful Admiral shall: -(17)-- preside in Absence of Faithful Navigator. 1. Preside at all meetings of his assembly in the absence of Lhe Faithful Navigator and Faithful Captain. preside in Absence of Faithful Friar. 2. In the absence of the Faithful Friar, perform his duties at assembly meetings. Other Duties. 3. Perform any other duties assigned to him by the Faithful Navigator. (;) Board of Trustees consist of: The Board of Trustees shall consist of the Faithful Navi- gator and three members to be elected by the assembly. The Faithful Navigator shall be its Chairman. Atthe first election of a new assembly three Trustees shall be elected; one to hold office for one year or until the second nextregular election, one for two years or until the second next regular election; and the other for three years or until the third next regular election; as determined by lot among themselves. Thereafter. at each succeeding election one Trustee shall be chosen for a term of three years. The Trustees shall have supervision of all the financial business of the assembly and their approval shall be necessary for the payment of all moneys, except demands of the Supreme Council, initiation fees due the District Mm nts regular and usual payments of the assembly, and pay authorized by the assembly after resolution and vote in accordance with Section 24(k). They shall auditthe aceountsof the Comptroller and Purser annually as of June 30 and report thereon to their assembly, the Supreme Secretary, Supreme Master, Vice Supreme Master. and Master upon blanks approved by the Board of Directors and furnished by the Supreme Assembly. They shall see that the Faithful Comp- trollerand Faithful Purser give proper bonds running to the Knights of Columbus in trust for their particular a,QSembly and in amounts fixed by said Trustees, and they shall be the custodians of such bonds. But in case the Board of Directors shall bond such officers, the Trustees shall be charged only with fixing the amount of such bonds in excess of the amount~~ provided for by said Board of Directors and in such case they shall have evidence that said officers shall have been bonded in such excess amount. They shall perform such other duties as their assembly or the District Master or V ice Supreme Master or the officers of the Order may direct,. --(18}- ~' (j) Elections. The regular election of officers in Assemblies shall take place annually at the first regular business meeting of the Assembly held in June of each year. The officers then elected shall hold office for the term of one year and until their successors are elected and qualified. Such officers shall take office, with or without installation, at the first regular meeting of each assembly in July following their election. Such officers shall be installed not later than the first regular meeting in October of each year. Special elections to fill vacancies maybe held on one week's notice. The provisions of the laws as to council elections shall apply as far as practicable. The Faithful Navigator shall within ten days after the election, file report of the same, together with the names and addresses of all officers elected, with the Master of the District. and shall send a duplicate of such report to the Supreme Secretary. (k) Assembly funds. 1. All moneys obtained from any source, by or through any person or persons, acting for or in the name of the assembly or under its direction or authority, shall be considered assembly funds and shall be forthwith delivered to the Faithful Comp- troller, who shall give his official receipt therefor and who shall report at the close of each meeting the amounts so received and from what source. 2. No money in excess of $100.00 shall be paid or transferred from the treasury of any assembly (except such moneys as the assembly is called upon to regularly pay for its current expenses. demands of the Supreme Council. purposes ap- proved by the Supreme Council or Board of Directors, or initiation fees due the District. Master) unless by a two-thirds vote of the members present and voting at a regular meeting held subsequent to a regular meeting at which notice in writing of a resolution of intention to pay or transfer such money and the purposes and amount to be paid or transferred shall have been Riven and regularly read. Provided, however, that any assembly may, by by-law, properly approved, provide ,~ and maintain a fund for rendering mutual aid and assistance to its sick, disabled and needy members and their families and families of deceased members. Said by-laws to state the manner in which, and by whom, the said fund is to be expended. -(19}- ARTICLE IX Section 25. Eligibility for Membership. be made Ito an1y Assembly provided the appl can Ds gree may (a) Over eighteen years of age. (b) A citizen of the country in which he resides, or with .permission of the Master of the District over the area where he claims citizenship, with the understanding that if permission is granted the pledge of allegiance will be to the country of ,~; citizenship. (c) A Third Degree member in good standing in his council and who was initiated in the Admission (First) Degree at least twelve months prior to his initiation in the Fourth Degree. or (d) A former member whose membership was terminated for failure to pay dues or by a withdrawal card if he has been readmitted to good standing in his council and if he was a priolrto htsrloss of good standpng~m h s counc j an six months (e) A practical Catholic in union with the Holy See. Exemplification Fee. Section 26. The exemplification fee shall be set annually by the Board of Directors at its October meeting for the ensuing year and the fee shall include a social baldric, Fourth Degree pin and one ticket to the banquet. Form of Application. Section 27. Third Degree members desiring to join the Fourth Degree shall make application on the official form provided, conforming strictly with all its requirements and presenting the same, together with the initiation fee, to the Faithful Comptroller of the Assembly who shall forthwith determine thatsaid applicant isa member in good standing in the council to which he claims membership. Having .de- ; termined that the applicant is a Third Degree member in good standing in his council, the Faithful Comptroller shall present said application to the Faithful Navigator for processipg. Admission Committee. Section 28. Immediately upon his election it shall be the duty of the Faithful Navigator to appoint an Admission Committee of seven members including the Faithful Admiral who shall be the Chairman. Within five days after the reading of each --(20F- ,~,, _~ application for membership at the first regular or special meeting following their receipt, the Faithful Navigator shall refer the same to the Admission Committee and thereupon said committee shall notify the applicant to appear before it for examination as to his qualifications for membership. If five members of the committee shall file a written report with- holdingendorsement because the applicant is not a practical Catholic or a good citizen, said applicant shall be deemed rejected. Otherwise, the recommendations of the Admission ~~ Committee shall be evidenced by the certificate of the Chair- man ofthe Committee on a form to be prescribed by the Board of Directors. In the event of the failure or neglect of the Admission Committee to make report within ten days after an application has been referred to it, the Faithful Navigator shall discharge the said committee and shall forthwith present said application to the assembly for action. Disposition of Application. Section 29. 1. Unless the application is rejected for the reason stated in Section 28, it shall be read by the Faithful Navigator at the first regular or special meeting following the time allowed for the report of the Admission Committee and the assembly shall proceed forthwith to ballot for the admission of such applicant after said reading. Inspection of Ballot. 2. The Faithful Navigator and Faithful Captain shall in turn privately inspect the ballot box. both before and after the ballot, and the former shall announce the result. If the number of negative ballots cast does not exceed one-half of the members present, the applicant shall be declared elected, otherwise rejected. The exact number of negative ballots shall not be stated. All ballots for membership shall be secret but the Faithful Navigator may order a second ballot at the same meeting upon the same application when, in his judgment it may be warranted by circumstances, provided such second ballot shall be ordered before the first ballot shall be declared and ~ ~ before any further busi ness shall be transacted, but no further balloting shall be permitted. When Several Candidates. 3. If more than one candidate is to be balloted for at a meeting, the Faithful Navigator may announce that the first -(21 ~ ballot shall be a general ballot, and that if not more than one-half of those present shall cast negative ballots upon such general ballot, no other ballots shall be taken. If such an- nouncement is made, and not more than one-half negative ballots are cast upon said general ballot, all candidates so balloted for shall be declared elected. If more than one-half ind~vidualblallot shall be taken on~each candidate. ~ then an Rejection -Effect Of. Section 30. 1. An applicant rejected by the Admission Committee for the reason -set forth in Section 28 shall be considered ss rejected by the assembly. 2. Any applicant rejected by ballot who has been declared duly qualified by the Adm~ss~on Committee shall have the right to appeal such action to the Board of Directors. The Board may i= after noticehto the assemblyke such action as it deems prope Membership Cards. Section 31. A membership card shall be issued under the seat of the assembly for such time as the member may pay his dues but for a period of not less than twelve months. Said card shall state the member's name, residence, assembly to which he belongs and his membership number. The card shall contain the signature of the member and shall be counter- signed bythe Faithful Navigator and Faithful Comptrollerof the assembly. The presentation to the proper officer of a current membership card showing the member to be in good standing on the date presented shall entitle the member to all meetings of his assembly and ceremonial work, if he is also in possession of a current membership card in the Third Degree. Right to Transfer. Section 32 1. Any member in good standing in an assembly, evidenced by a paid-up membership card. who desires to join another assembly of his choice, may make application to the assembly he proposes to join on a form prepared by the Supreme Council. This request for transfer may be accepted or re~cctecl. notwithstanding the fact that the applicant is desirous of adjustments sh 11 be made by the as emb y on a pro ratallbasis --(22~ ~~ Action Upon Presentation of Transfer. 2. The completed application shall be received and acted upon promptly by the assembly to which presented. Said application must be laid before the assembly and if a majority of those present and voting at the meeting approve and accept the application, the member shall be declared elected. Disposition of Transfer. 3. The approved transfer application shall be filed by the Faithful Navigator and the Faithful Comptroller of the ® receiving assembly and shall then be forwarded to the Faithful Comptroller of the former assembly who shall provide the receiving assembly the information as to the date of initiation into the Fourth Degree, as to the dues, arrearages, or credits. The Faithful Comptroller of the former assembly shall then return said application to the Faithful Comptroller of the receiving assembly who will record said. information and forward forthwith the application to the Supreme Secretary. Dues on Transfer. 4. At the time of approval of the application for transfer, the receiving assembly shall require the applicant to pay the usual advance dues in addition to dues and other charges owing to the former assembly. Any adjustment of dues shall be made between the assemblies on a pro-rata basis. Withdrawal. Section 33. Any member in good standing desiring to withdraw from the Fourth Degree may requeston form issued to him a withdrawal card signed by the Supreme Secretary upon payment of all dues which shall be certified by the Faithful Comptroller and Faithful Navigator of his Assembly. Suspension for Failure to Pay Dues. Section 34. 1. A member who shall fail to pay dues to his assembly within three months after the same are levied and payable shall cease to be a member in good standing and shall be subject to suspension by the assembly but only if the Faithful Comptroller notifies the Supreme Assembly on the prescribed form. Suspension or Withdrawal of Council Membership. 2. The suspension or withdrawal of a member in his council ®shall sutomat~cally terminate his membership in the Fourth Degree. Restoration of Membership. Section 3G. 1. Any former member of the Fourth Degree who has -(23}- terminated his membership for any period of time may restore that membership under the following conditions: (a) Provided that he terminated his membership through a w ithdrawal card, he may apply to the assembly of his choice at no charge except for payment of the usual advance dues. Said application shall be laid before the assembly and if a majority presentand votingapprove and accept the application, itshall be sent with the withdrawal card to the Supreme Secretary. (b) If the member was suspended by a former assembly for failure to pay dues, he may make application for restoration of membership to any assembly of his choice upon payment of a fee of $5.00 in addition to the usual advance dues. Said application shall be laid before the assembly and if a majority present and voting at the meeting approve and accept the application, heshall be declared elected. The Faithful Comp- troller of the receiving assembly will immediately send the application along with the payment of $5.00 to the former assembly, in .lieu of all arrearages that said applicant may have owed the former assembly. The Faithful Comptroller of the former assembly, upon receipt of the $5.00 and the application form, shall sign said form acknowledging receipt and provide the date of exemplification and any other member- shipdata that may be requested by the receiving assembly. Said document is to be returned to the Faithful Comptroller of the receiving assembly who shall forthwith record said membership information in the records of the assembly and forward the application to the Supreme Office for immediate recording. Honorary Life Membership. Section 36. (a) Members who have attained the actual age of ?0 years and who have been members of the Fourth Degree for twenty- five consecutive years, and those who have been members of the Fourth Degree fifty years regardless of age, shall be designated as Honorary Life members and on due request in writing to the Faithful Comptroller, they shall be'exgmpt from further payment of dues. ~ ~; (b) The status of Honorary Life Membership whicfi a priest or member of a religious community automatically acquires upon taking the First Degree of the Order shall enure to such member upon his qualifying for and takinRthe Fourth Ikgree and such member shall be exempt from the_ payment of initiation fees and Assembly dues. -(24H .~~ ARTICLE X MISCONDUCT, NONFEASANCE. TRIALS AND APPEALS OF ASSEMBLY. MEMBERS AND OFFICERS Section 37. Any member of the Fourth Degree guilty of conduct unbecoming a Knight of Columbus, or of any ap- plicable offense set forth in Chapter XVIII of the Charter Constitution and Laws of the Order or of these laws, shall be expelled or suspended from the Fourth Degree under the procedure outlined m Chapter XIX of said Laws of the Order. Appeal may be taken to the Board of Directors by the ® aggrieved member within thirty days after judgment, and the decision of the Board shall be final. ARTICLE XI OFFICIAL DRESS AND REGALIA Dress for Exemplification. ' Section 38. (a) The official dress for candidates for the Fourth Degree Exemplification shall be~lack tie, white shirt, black footwear and tuxedo which may be black or white, depending on the season or geographical area. A member serving in the armed forces of his country shall be considered in proper attire when dressed in military uniform. Regalia. (b) The regalia of the Fourth.Degree shall consist of the official dress and social baldric. Cape and chapeau are only required of those members participating m the Color Corps. ARTICLE XII COLOR CORPS The Establishment thereof. Section 39. ' (a) Assembly may henceforth establish a uniform drill corps with the approval of the Master of the District and such unit shall be known as "Fourth Degree Color Corps of ..... . As.embly." (b) A Color Corps may, participate in exemplifications, religious and public functions only with the consent of the ® Master. The Master shall have full control of the Color Co in his district, except as hereinafter provided and shall be held strictly accountable for such unit. (c) The Faithful Navigator shall appoint a Commander of the Color Corps for his Assembly. -(~1~- Dress for Color Corps. Section 40. The dress for the Color Corps or any previously organized uniformed units of the Fourth Degree shall be as determined from time to time by a directive of the Board of Directors. In the absence of such directive the Supreme Master shall have full control of the dress requirements. Regalia for Color Corps. Section 41. (a) The official regalia for Color Corps shall be a navy type chapeau, ca , service baldric and silver sword. Vice Supreme Masters, Masters and former such officers only shall be. permitted to bear the gold sword. (b) The colors to be used with the capes and chapeaus of the Color Corps are as follows: Vice Supreme Master Blue Cape and Chapeau Master Gold Cape and Chapeau Faithful Navigator White Cape and Chapeau District Marshall .Green Cape and Chapeau Assembly Commander Purple Cape and Chapeau Color Corps Red Cape and White Chapeau (c) The colors worn by Vice Supreme Masters, Masters and Faithful Navigators may continue to be worn by such officers following their completion of service in that office. (d) These colors shall be mandatory June 30,1981. Procedure and Manual of the Sword. Section 42. The procedure and the Manual of the Sword shall be as determined from time to time by a directive from the Board of Directors. In the absence of such directive the Master has full control provided however, that he first receives approval of such procedure from the Supreme Master. ARTICLE XIII Fourth Degree Emblem. ~ , Section 43. The official emblem of the Fourth Degree Rhall be worn only !~y members of the !•'ourth IkKrcti. Members of the Order who are not members of the Fourth DeRrcM are forbidden to wear or use the emblem under penalty of • expulsion from the Order. . Officers' Jewels. Section 44. The design and use of any 'ewel of office or distinctive medal or insignia of honor shad only be such as have been approved by the Board of Directors -(~~- Pa.4t -Officers Entitled to the Prefix "Past" Section 45. A Past Faithful Navigator completing at least one full term in said office or having served more than six full months of an unexpired term in said office shall be entitled to the title and privileges thereof with the prefix °Past" on retirement from the same, pprovided a member elected Faith- ful Navigator of an a.SSembly at itg establishment and holding until the end of such term shall have the same title and privileges as if he had filled a full term. Also, a member shall ® have such title but not the privileges in the assembly to which he may subsequently transfer his membership. Privilege of Membership. Section 46. A member of the Fourth Degree in good standing is privileged to attend meetings of any assembly but without voice or vote except in his own. Ceremonials. Section 47. Pursuant to Section 37 of the Laws of the Order, the Board of Directors reserves to itself the power and authority to adopt, devise and establish such ceremonial for the Fourth Degree as it may determine, and to have full supervision of the exemplification of all ceremonial work of the Degree and to modify or alter the same at pleasure. Additional Laws Governing. Section 48. In all matters notexpressly covered by the Laws (;overningthe Fourth Degree, the prceedureshall bethesame as that provided by the Constitution.and Laws of the Knights of Columbus. • Adopted AuRvst 17,1970 Amended October 18,1970 Amended Octobcr7.l, 1972 Amended .1:inuary'l.~i, 1975 Amendrxl .luny 19. I!177 Anumd~rl Oelr-lK~r'l!{. I!177 Anumdrvl April 111, 1!17K Amendc~ri .lone L2. I!YT8 Amendr.~rl October 211, 1978 Amcndccl tieptember (i. 1980 Amended (ktober 25,1980 Amended January 17.1981 Amended October 8.1982 Amended Augtrst:i,198:1 Amender! Ur~lolx~r lei, 198:1 Amr~ndrrl April 14. 1!ItM Amend~~rl .lunc 8, 1984 Amendrxl Septemlwr 18,1984 Amended April 4,1987 IIII.ARY F. SCHMITT7.EII1':, Supreme Master Attract: VII%(~II.C.1)ECI~ANT, Supreme Knight CIiARI.I':S 1'. I;ll•:SB)JCK, JR., Supreme Secretary -{27}- +~~ INDEX page Section Admissions Committee .......................... 21 28 Assemblies ..................................... 11 18 Assembly 18 24(i) • Board of Trustees ............................. By-Laws ..................................... 12 21 14 24 Duties of Officers ............................. 19 U) 24 Elections ............:........................ 19 24(k) Funds ....................................... 12 20 Meetings ..................................... Officers ...................................... 13 23 Order of Business ............................. 13 22 Board of Directors .............................. 3 1 ..................... Candidates - Official Drees 2b Ceremonials .................................... 27 47 Charters ....................................... 12 19 Clergy - Exemplification Fee ................... 24 fi(b) Color Corps ...............................:.:.. 2b 39 Constitution snd Laws of the Knights of Columbus 27 48 Districts ....................................... 6 13 District Assemblies ............................. 6 14 7 14(d) BY-Laws ..................................... Expense ............................. ....... ..... i 7 7 lb 14(t) ness ........................ Order of Bus . ............ 12' ~1 Dues ............................... Emblem ....................................... Z6 20 43 2Q Exemplifcation Fee ...............:............. Masters . Appointment ................................. '8 '17(a) Duties and Power ............................. 8 171c-P) Term ........................................ 8 17(b) --(E8}- ,~ a. + Page Section Membership Card ................................ 22 31 . Document ............................ 20 27 Election Procedure ...................... 21 29 Eligibility ............................ ZO 2b Privileges ............................. 27 46 Honorary Life ......................... 24 36 Rejections ............................. 22 30 Restoration ............................ 24 35 ® Suspensions ........................... 24 34 Suspension or Expulsion .................. 26 3? Transfer .............................. 23 32 Withdrawal ........................... 23 33 Officers Jewels .......................... 2T 44 Past Officers -Title .....................~. 2T 4b Provinces .............................. 6 11 Provincial Assemblies ..:........ . ......... 5 12 Regalia ................................ 26 38 Supreme Assembly Duties ............................... 3 b Meetings ............................. 3 4 Membership ........................... 3 3 Powers.......~ ........................ 3 6 Powers of Officers ........ . ............. 4,b 8,9,10 Remuneration of Members ................ 4 ? Supreme Knight ..............:.......... 3 3 Su{,reme Master Appointment. Term, Duties ............... 4 8 Supreme Secretary ....................... 4 9 Vice Supreme Master ..................... 4 10 lr ~I u -(29~ .,.. t ,',r a~iF `~.r ~; ~ ~~' ~: ~' ~. mM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER AugUS t 2 E) , 19 9 2 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated July 14, 1992, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective August 25, 1992. ADDITIONS LENGTH MEADOWS OF TRENT Route 1072 (Ashbury Court) - From Route 610 to 0.09 mile Northeast Route 610 0.09 Mi Route 1073 (Ashbury Drive) - From Route 1072 to 0.20 mile Northeast Route 1072 0.20 Mi Route 1074 (Greenmont Court) - From Route 1073 to 0.07 mile East Route 1073 0.07 Mi Sincerely, Ray D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY SAMPLE RESOLUTION Needed by 5pm, Sept. 16, 1992 to meet grant application deadline. (Please call 342-6025, if later than the 16th, for further details.) WHEREAS, economic development is recognized as an essential ingredient in creating jobs, increasing the tax base and raising the quality of life of all Virginians; and WHEREAS, tourism is recognized as an $8 billion industry in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a vital component in econmic development; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau promotes tourism throughout the urban and rural region, including the counties of: Botetourt, Craig, Franklin, and Roanoke; the cities of: Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and County of Roanoke have adopted resolutions supporting the Bureau's application for the Virginia Tourism Accreditation Program; and WHEREAS, the top needs of the region include increasing tourism and enhancing regional cooperation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley is becoming known for its recreational activities, scenic vistas, festivals, major events, historic landmarks, and visitor facilities and services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT (Name of Organization or Government) supports the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau's application to The Center on Rural Development for an innovative grant to implement a new, low band visitor information/highway advisory radio system along the rural area of Interstate-81; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the purpose of the grant is to promote rural tourism in an effective, useful, and innovative manner that will result in educating the I-81 traveler about the region he or she is driving through with the ultimate intent of attracting a portion of travelers into the region for economic benefit. Please forward to: Martha Mackey Executive Director Roanoke Valley Convention 114 Market Street Roanoke, VA 24011 & Visitors Bureau .~ ~ ,~~~ ~' ,r-, ;~ ~~ ~~~~- Z_ ',~ `~ yt i , Number: 168191 Posted: 08/14/92 09:50 Type: Regular Message Received: 08/14/92 16:31 Subject: Board Agenda From: DDH - Diane Hyatt To: MHA - Mary Allen I will have an item for the August 25, 1992 agenda to approve the capital budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. Since The RVRA will not be voting on the budget until Thursday, August 20, 1992, it will not be ready until late Thursday, or I may even have to hand it out at the Board meeting. The hold up is that I am basing it on the pricing of the bonds which will occur on August 19, 1992. In another matter, on September 22, 1992 I will need to have a public hearing and adopt a resolution for the sale of the VPSA bonds. I am expecting the info from our bond council shortly. Number: 177154 Posted: 09/10/92 10:24 Type: Regular Message Received: 09/10/92 10:28 Subject: Sept 22 Board Meeting From: DDH - Diane Hyatt To: MHA - Mary Allen I will have the following reports for the Sept 22 Board meeting 1. Contingency Reports 2. Financial statements for the two months ending August 31, 1992. 3. Accounts Paid for the month of August 1992. 4. VPSA Public Hearing and Resolution 5. Reimbursement Resolution for the G.O. Bonds 6. Preliminary Resolution for the Purchase of Buildings (?) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED BOND FINANCING BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "Count') will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds (the "Bonds") of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $1,830,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on September 22, 1992. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on September 22, 1992, before the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in the Community Room in the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Please publish once a week on the following dates: September 8, 1992 September 15, 1992 Please send bill to: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 e LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 22, 1992, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Dominion Bank, National Association to eliminate conditions on an approximate 12 acre parcel zoned B-2 conditional, located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 50 feet west of its intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1992 y-~ ~~ ~• .~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, September 8, 1992 Tuesday, September 15, 1992 Direct the bill for publication to: A. G. Heinemann, Vice President Dominion Bank, National Association PO Box 13327 Roanoke, VA 24040 (703) 563-7891 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 .. WORK SESSION SET FOR 7/14/92 ~~~ S• ~ SEC RRHB PRESENTED ADDITIONAL CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED U• PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An ordinance to rezone 24.090 acres from M-2 to M-3 to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, located on the south side of Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Asphalt Paving Company. (Terry Harrington, Planning and i o~n2ing Director) (CONTIlVLTED I7NTli, SEPTEIy~gER 22, CONTINUED UNTIL 9-22-92 AT RE VEST OF PETITIONER 2. An Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by ~~ amending Section 12-8, Adoption of State Law, of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County. Attorney) 0-62392-8 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. An Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.615 Acres from B-1 and R-1 to B-2 to Operate a New Car Dealership Located at the Corner of Peters Creek Road and Deer Branch Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Valley Motorsport. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) 0-62392-9 BTiT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 9 IN ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION. M• REPORTS 1• General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2• Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3• Board Contingency Fund 4• Accounts Paid -July 1992 5• Schedule of Community Meetings to be Held on the Proposed Zoning Maps. N• FORK SESSIONS 1• Noise Ordinance 1 COMMENT, ~r E• REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F• REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G• FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1• Ordinance to Amend and Reenact Section 7-61, Roanoke County Code and Adopt Section 105, Unsafe Buildings, Volume II, Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/22/92 URC 2• Ordinances Amending and Reenacting Various Sections of the Roanoke County Code to Reflect Recent Legislative Changes By the General Assembly. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) BDT MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND-9/` URC a• ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 3-5. SMOKING PROHIBITED., SEC. 3-8. EXEIVIpTIONS. SEC 3-10. POSTING REQUIREMENTS AND SEC. 3-12. ENFORCEMENT. OF ARTICLE II, ROANOKE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY OF CHAPTER 3, AIR POLLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE REGARDING EXCEPTIONS TO AND ENFORCEMENT OF VIRGINIA INDOOR CLEAN AIR ACT. THE b• ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 4-86. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 4-90. PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT. nPFi2 A TTllur ,-.~ _ 3 GENERALLY. SEC. 4-95. LIMITATION ON VALUE OF PRIZES., SEC. 4-96. FINANCIAL RECORDS AND REPORTS GENERALLY., SEC. 497. CERTIFICATE TO ACCOMPANY FINANCIAL REPORT. SEC 4-100. LIMITATION ON FRE UENCY OF BINGO GAMES. SEC 4-101. RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF GROSS RECEIPTS FROM BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES. SEC 4113. UALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANT AND SEC. 4117. VALID ONLY IN COUNTY AND AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS• EXCEPTION. OF ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 7-68, REPAIR OR DEMOLITION BY COUNTY OF ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUC'T'URES OF CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING LIENS AGAINST REAL ESTATE FOR COST OF REPAIR OR DEMOLITION ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 9-18. ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9~ FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO AUTHORIZE FIRE MARSHAL TO ENTER PROPERTY TO INVESTIGATE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 10-4, APPLICATION FOR LICENSE• DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER' PT'NA T TTiTC~ ....~ _ APPLICATION OR FILING FALSE~STATEMENTS.~ OF ARTICLE L IN GENERAL TO RESTRICT ISSUANCE OF BUSINESS LICENSES WHERE ANY TAXES DUE THE COUNTY ARE UNPAID AND SEC. 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10 LICEN_ OF THE ROANOKE COUNT CODE TO ADD AND DELETE CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS AND TO ADD ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 12-26, REOUIRED• EXCEPTIONS, OF ARTICLE II. COCO=NTY 4 VEHICLE LICENSE, OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING THE SITUS OF MOTOR VEHICLES g• ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC 12-54. PARKING PROHIBITED IN SPECIFIED PLACES. OF ARTICLE III, PARS OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES BY ABOVE GRADE SIGNS. h• ORDINANCE ENACTING SEC. 12-102, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES INVOLVED IN ACCIDENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO REMOVE VEHICLES VVIIICH ARE IMPEDING THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC AND FOR THEIR STORAGE i• ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 16.1- 25. INSPECTION OF RECORDS RE UIRED BY CHAPTER AND OR ARTICLES LISTED IN SUCK RECORDS., OF ARTICLE II. DEALERS, OF CHAP'T'ER 16.1, PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO TAKE POSSESSION OF ITEMS KNOW TO BE STOLEN. ~• ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SEC. 17-2. DEFINITIONS., SEC. 17-14. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS., AND SEC. 17-15. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS GENERALLY., OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, SEC. 17-75. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES., OF DIVISION 3. COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION, AND SEC. 17-86. DEFINITIONS., OF DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES, OF ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF CHAPTER 17 PROCUREMENT CODE OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT BY WgICg ~J~D-PRICE CONTRACTS MAY BE INCREASED BY THE PURCHASING AGENT, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 5 AWARDS 1• Announcement of Enhanced ISO Rating for Roanoke County. (Tommy Fuqua, Fire and Rescue Chief) CHECK ON 4FVFUSr nn.~~,.,....~.~..~ _ _ ARE REDUCED. D• NEW BUSINESS 1• Request for Adoption of the Regional Cable TV Operatin Budget. (Anne Marie Green, Public Information Officer) g A-9- 892-1 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-B .T,FM,HCN,LBE NAYS-EGK 2• Request to Revise Policy for use of the Roanoke Coun Administration Center Communi ~ Hodge, County Administrator) ~ Room. (Elmer C. A-9-_? UNDER RESO 32889 b AYES-BL-T,EGK,HCN NAYS-FM LBE 3• Request for Approval of Recommendation to Implement Removal, Remedial and Closure of Dixie Caverns Landfill. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) CONTINUED TO 9/22/92 ____ - - ROADS, ETC. s K REPORTS AND INQi7IRIES OF BOARD MED'iBERS COUNTY DOES FOR THAT AGE GROUP, DAUGHTER, L. CITIZENS' COMI~ZENTS AND CO1~IlVj~CATIONS 1• Dr. Allan Hoffman, President of the Roanoke River Basin Association to speak on Issues Affecting Water Availability to Roanoke County. 4. Request for Approval of Two Change Orders for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Contract. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) A-82592-4 APPROVAL OF #8 UNTIL SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 URC MAKE THIS CHANGE TO THE RECORD. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on September 22, 1992, to Review Tax Exemption Programs for Air/Water Pollution Control and Recycling Equipment. LBE SET WORK SESSION FOR SEPTEMBER 22 1992 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G• REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIItST READING OF REZONIlVG ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA HCN MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING 3 SECOND - 9/22/92 URC 1. An Ordinance to Eliminate Conditions on an Approximate 12 Acre Parcel Zoned B-2 Conditional, Located on the North Side of Peters Creek Road Approximately 50 Feet West of its Intersection with Centurion Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Dominion Bank, National Association. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. APPOINTMENTS NONE K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII,L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT 4 ENDORSEMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Virginia's continued economic growth and development is dependent upon the Commonwealth's ability to provide for the needs of its citizens both now and into the 21st century; WHEREAS, pia voters will have the opportunity to approve three bond referenda on November 3 that will provide funds to construct and renovate the facilities necessary to serve the state's growing population; WHE there have n no s e-supported capi improvement prog or higher education ' ce 198 ,yet that eriod enrol nt in cull s and~u~i ities has wn by 40,000 and by r 000 anothe ,000 students s e nt in Vir ' ' colleges and universities; WHEREAS, $472.4 million is earmarked for the capital needs of higher education, providing badly needed classroom, laboratory and other teaching space, correction of life-safety code deficiencies, repairs to libraries, additions to computer centers, and other needs; ~'~ ~ ~~~,~ ding for f those cit' ns of the omv~alth v~' h mental disabilities is a respo ' rtv of all ans~ WHEREAS, $45.2 million is appropriated for the construction and renovation of seven high-priority projects for current and projected patient needs, particularly for children and elderly Virginians, enabling Virginia to meet the legal mandates d ensuring that state facilities will continue to receive Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements, r -.--s#ate-btitfget; ~:~_. -._ ._ WHEREAS\touris is ~ 'a's econd-largest Indust and i rk s ste is v component of that industry, he o pump $80 million annually~s`_y~ s~econo WHEREAS, $95.4 million is allocated to upgrade existing park facilities and purchase new land, enhancing Virginia's tourist potential and increasing the flow of out-of-state revenue to Virginia; ~~9~ `' WAS swill not have to be raised ~/ cen A °U~ ~ , passage o _ wilJ~reate 3,600 new jobs and generate $22 million in new revenue; ~^7 ~-- WHEREAS, passage of these three referenda will not jeopardize Virginia's AAA bond rating; `~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the endorses the passage of all throe referenda on the November 3, 1992, ballot, authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the encourages the voters of Virginia to vote "YES" on each Question of whether the referendum should take effect. ~~ OFFICERS President Lynwood Day, Ph.D. President-Elect Julie M. Danstrom Secretary Marron Kunkle Treasurer J. William Pistner Immediate Past President David W. Hartman, M.D. BOARD OF DIRECTORS '+lary C. Barrow llilliam L. Bauman, Jr. Susan W. Blaylock Jufie M. Danstrom Lynwood Day, Ph.D. Doris C. Egge Gudrun Freeman, Ph.D. Rita J. Gliniecki Carolyn E. Haley Ann Harman David W. Hartman. M.D. Ann Hutton Thomas T. Johnson Robert M. Kahle Kay G. Kostura Marion Kunkle James J. Lanter, Ph.D. Susan M. McDonald, Ed.D. John P. McDowell. Ph.D. Janet K. McKinney tJnda J. Mitchell ..ohn Parrott, Jr. J. William Pistner S. James Sikkema Nell C. Thompson Kathryn Van Patten Cheryl D. Watson. J.D. O. Beech Watson, III David E. Wolfe LIFETIME DIRECTORS Joseph J. Duetsch. Ph.D. Caddie Fisher Elizabeth Messer Richard F. Pence Jean Pritchard Marion Rich /irginia Schricker EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Diane Kelly United Why of Roanoke /alley, Inc. Mental Health Association of l~oanoke Valley, Inc. 114 CARLTON TERRACE BUILD NG 920 SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 PHONE (703) 344-0931 Mr. Lee Eddy Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Eddy; September 4, 1992 On November 3, Virginians will be asked to vote on three general obligation bond issues: $472.4 million for Higher Education projects, $95.4 million for Parks and Recreation projects, and $45.2 million for Mental Health Facilities projects. If approved, these bonds will benefit nearly all Virginians by providing funds for 130 projects at 60 facilities and institutions. These projects are critical to meet the demand for services in higher education, recreation, andrmental health facilities. Southwest Virginia will receive $123 million in constriction monies if the bond referenda are passed. Specifically, the passage of the mental health bond will ensure the installation of a much-needed fire safety system and other life safety code improvements at Catawba Hospital. It will provide funds for the construction of along-overdue Patient Activities Building at Catawba as well. Please review the enclosed materials with members of your Board or organization. If you wish to endorse these bond referenda, please complete the enclosed "Endorsement Resolution" and return it to me in the Mental Health Association office. If you have questions or need additional information on the bond issues, we will be happy to provide a speaker for your group. Your support will be very much appreciated by mental health advocacy organizations. I look forward to hearing from you. DR/mlr Enclosures Sinc-e_rely, ~/~r~ Diane Relly Executive Director