Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/27/1993 - RegularO~ p,OAN ,~,~ z p X838 C~~~xrtt~ ~~ ~.v~x~~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA APRIL 27, 1993 lawn ar na ru ema Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE A BUDGET WORK SESSION AT 130 P.M. A. BUDGET WORK SESSION (130 P.M.) ROLL CALL AT 135 P.M. EGK ARRIVED AT 1:55 P.M. - ECH TO BRING BACK COSTS TO HIRE PARKS & REC DIRECTOR AND FUND BENEFITS FOR 40 HR PART TIME EMPLOYEES. - WORK SESSION TO BE SCHEDULED ON VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY - BOARD CONSENSUS TO INCREASE SEWER RATES - BOARD CONSENSUS NOT TO INCREASE BULK AND BRUSH COLLECTION - BOARD CONSENSUS THAT FUNDS FOR CONVENTION BUREAU SHOULD BE EARMARKED FOR ADVERTISING ONLY AND REPORT SENT BACK ON HOW MONEY WAS SPENT. - BOARD CONSENSUS TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE FUNDING FOR SERVICE AND CULTURAL AGENCIES - BOARD CONSENSUS TO FUND TWO DARE OFFICERS AND NEW VEHICLE i ® RecvdP<t Parma. - ECH TO BRING BACK INFO ON INCREASED E911 TAX TO FUND DISPATCHERS AFTER BUDGET PROCESS - ECH TO MEET WITH DR WILSON TO FIND ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR SCHOOL SALARY INCREASES - ECH TO BRING BACK INFO ON HEALTH CARE INSURANCE FOR EMPLOYEE AND ONE DEPENDENT. B. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Irrvocation: The Reverend Alan Rowbotham Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. C. RE(AUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE D. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring May 3 -May 15, 1993 as Virginia Heritage Tourism Weeks HCN MOTION TO ADOPT URC ACCEPTED BY DEEDIE KAGEY AND DR TOHN KERN 2. Resolution of Appreciation to Susan Blevins, Karen Shelton and Pat Sales for their Efforts at Creating the z Freedom Playground at Penn Forest. R-42793-1 BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE URC ACCEPTED BY SUSAN BLEVINS, KAREN SHELTON AND PAT SALES 3. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Cornention on April 28, 1993. R-42793-2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC ACCEPTED BY TERN HOLBROOK, SUPERVISOR OF BUSINESS EDUCATION AND HOME ECONOMICS AND COORDINATOR OF CONVENTION E. BRIEFINGS 1. Presentation on Explore (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) SPEAKING WERE: RUPERT CUTLER, TIM OLIN, STAN IANFORD, AND PEGGY MOLES. 2 CITIZENS SPOKE F. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Projects for 1993-94 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) A-42793-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-BL~T,LBE,HCN NAYS-FM ABSTAIN-EGK 2. Request for Approval of the 1993-94 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 3 R-42793-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 3. Request from the Sheriff to Retain Fees Collected from Several Small Jail Operations Accounts. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) A-42793-5 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC G. OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Appropriation to Fund Engineering Consultant for Upgrade for the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 13, 1993) A-42793-6 BLOT MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-BI{T,HCN,FM NAYS-EGK,LBE 2. Request for Approval of Finance Agreement with Richfield for Payment of Water Connection Fee. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 13, 1993) CON'T'INUED TO ALLOW STAFF TO BRING BACK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT STATEMENT H. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on May 11, 1993 to Discuss the Drainage Program. WORK SESSION SET FOR 5/11/93 2. Request for Work Session on May 25, 1993 to Discuss 4 Illegal Dumping. WORK SESSION SET FOR 5/25/93 3. Request for Work Session on June 8, 1993 with Sheriff Gerald Holt. WORK SESSION SET FOR 6/8/93 WORK SESSION ON VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY SET FOR AUGUST I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing on the Adoption of an Ordinance to Increase the Salaries of the Board of Supervisors. HCN MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING AT 3% SAIARY INCREASE - URC J. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 25 WITH ITEM 2 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE - URC 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Commercial Indoor Amusement Area, Located at 5383 W. Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Natasha Ross. 2. Ordinance to Rezone a .359 Acre Parcel From C-2 to AV to Operate an Office, Located at 7155 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Blue Ridge International Limited Liability Company. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC 1~[EARING FOR 5/25/93 - URC 3. Ordinance to Amend the Special Exception Permit to Reflect the Actual Surveyed Acreage of the Area Originally Permitted and to Incorporate Lands Acquired for the Entrance, Tipper Building, and Rail Yard Associated with the Regional Landfill at Smith Gap, Located Northwest Side of Fort Lewis Mountain Between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. K. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Establishing procedure to Enforce the Prohibited Discharge of Stormwater Surface Water, Groundwater, Roof Runoff or Subsurface Drainage into the Public Sanitary Sewer System, by Requiring Certain Corrections to Buildings or Structure, Penalties for Noncompliance, Disconnection, and Appeals from Such Determinations. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING - NO VOTE LBE SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING WITH LANGUAGE REGARDING TER1ViINATION OF SERVICE REMOVED. AYES-EGK.LBE,FM NAYS-HCN,BI;T 2ND - 5/25/93 - URC 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a .69 Acre Parcel of Real Estate in Connection with the Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill -Tax Parcel 64.01-4-33. 6 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 5/25/93 - URC L. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Adopting a Fee Schedule for Police Department Services Related to Traffic Control for Parades and Background Investigations for Concealed Weapons Permits and Conservators of the Peace. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-42793-7 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH ADDITION OF PROPOSED LANGUAGE ON PAGE 3 AYES-BI~T,EGK,LBE,FM NAYS-HCN 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of 4.0 Acre Parcel of Land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-42793-8 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC M. APPOINTMENTS N. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII,L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-42793-9 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC 1. Approval of Minutes -April 6, 1993. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. A-42793-9.a 3. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.13 Miles of Tinkerdale Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. A-42793-9.b 4. Donation of Right-of--Way in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. A-42793-9.c 5. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Golden View Acres. A-42793-9.d 6. Donation of Drainage Easement on Lot 6, Block 1, Section 23, of Hunting Hills Subdivision to the Board of Supervisors. A-42793-9.e 7. Acceptance of Donation of an Access Easement from the Salem Stone Corporation in Connection with the Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. A-42793-9.f O. REPORTS AND INQITIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Suuetvisor Kohinke:(1 Complimented staff on County Government Day activities at Tanglewood Mall. (21 Announced he had received largest number of phone calls regarding Explore Park. P. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS s NONE Q. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFl'ER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 5 AND 8 -UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -March 1993 5. Report on Bond Projects. 6. Report on 1991 Water Project 7. Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities 8. Report on Monitoring of Manhole Requirements R RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION AND RECOGNITION OF VOLUNTEERS WI1TI OVER 25 YEARS SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY. R-42793-10 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC S. BUDGET WORK SESSION WITH THE FIRE & RESCUE CHIEFS BOARD CHIEF ANITA HANSON, FT. LEWIS RESCUE REPRESENTED THE RESCUE CHIEFS AND REQUESTED TWO AMBUTANCES AND ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR OPERATIONAL COSTS. 9 CHIEF WAGNER, MOUNT PLEASANT FIRE REPRESENTED FIRE CHIEFS BOARD AND REQUESTED ONE FIRE TRUCK. HCN ASKED STAFF TO CHECK ON THE COST OF THE HEPATITIS B VACCINE FROM BOB TERNIGAN. CHIEFS AND VOLUNTEERS WERE INTRODUCED. T. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with lega' counsel and briefings by staff members, pertaining to Smith Gap Landfill contract, (1) Personnel Matter; (3) Consideration of the disposition of publicly held property, i.e. well lot. BI;T MOTION AT 5~0 P.M. URC U. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-42793-11 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT RESO AT 6:45 P.M. URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.I V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to Elicit Comments Regarding the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 1993-94. 48 CITIZENS SPOKE W. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF io ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Indoor Archery Club to Construct an Addition, Located on Timberview Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Giles M. Gilley. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-42793-12 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. An Ordinance to Rezone 4.75 Acres from I-2 to R-2, Located at 1701 Underhill Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-42793-13 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Religious Assembly and Community Center, Located on Branico Drive, -Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jitendra Desai. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-42793-14 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Existing Church Building for Sunday School Rooms and Fellowship Hall, Located at 8269 Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Warren E. Booth. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-42793-15 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of an Existing Church Building and the Future Construction of Related Facilities, Located at 312 Azusa Street, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Azusa Street Ministries. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-42793-16 BI.~T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 6. Ordinance Authorizing the Relocation of the Office of the General Registrar to New Office Facilities and Relocation and Establishment of a Central Absentee Voter Election District. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-42793-17 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 7. Ordinance Authorizing Voting Precinct from Spring Junior High Attorney) the Relocation of the Castle Rock Cave Spring Fire Station to Cave School. (Paul Mahoney, County 0-42793-18 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 8. Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and County Sewer Ordinance to Allow Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCES - URC a. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 18- 63.1 "Procedures and Fees for Issuance of Permits for Septic Tanks, On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems and Wells" of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. 0-42793-19 b. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to provide for Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. 0-42793-20 9. Ordinance Declaring a 100' by 115' parcel of Real Estate Identified as .Tax Map No. 76.16-1-14 and located off Route 1666 (Sheldon Drive) to be Surplus and Accepting/Rejecting an Offer for the Sale of Same. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-42793-21 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-EGK,LBE,FM ABSTAIN-BL,T~HCN X. CITIZEN CONIlViENTS AND COD~IlViUNICATIONS NONE Y. ADJOi;fRNMENT EGK MOTION AT 10:00 P.M. - UW ~ aoaN ~,~ ~. z ~~ a 1838 (2~~~xx~#~ .~f ~.~~xx~~~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA APRIL 27, 1993 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE A BUDGET WORK SESSION AT 1~0 P.M. A. BUDGET WORK SESSION (1:30 P.M.) B. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Alan Rowbotham Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS D. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOG1vITIONS, AND AWARDS i ® Recycled Paper 1. Proclamation Declaring May 3 -May 15, 1993 as Virginia Heritage Tourism Weeks 2. Resolution of Appreciation to Susan Blevins, Karen Shelton and Pat Sales for their Efforts at Creating the Freedom Playground at Penn Forest. 3. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention on April 28, 1993. E. BRIEFINGS 1. Presentation on Explore Development Director) F. NEW BUSINESS (Tim Gubala, Economic 1. Consideration of Projects for 1993-94 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) 2. Request for Approval of the 1993-94 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 3. Request from the Sheriff to Retain Fees Collected from Several Small Jail Operations Accounts. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) G. OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Appropriation to Fund Engineering Consultant for Upgrade for the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) (COr1'1'INUED FROM APRIL 13,1993) 2. Request for Approval of Finance Agreement with Richfield for Payment of Water Connection Fee. (Clifford Craig, 2 Utility Director) (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 13, 1993) H. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on May 11, 1993 to Discuss the Drainage Program. 2. Request for Work Session on May 25, 1993 to Discuss Illegal Dumping. 3. Request for Work Session on June 8, 1993 with Sheriff Gerald Holt. I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing on the Adoption of an Ordinance to Increase the Salaries of the Board of Supervisors. J. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Commercial Indoor Amusement Area, Located at 5383 W. Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Natasha Ross. 2. Ordinance to Rezone a .359 Acre Parcel From C-2 to AV to Operate an Office, Located at 7155 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Blue Ridge International Limited Liability Company. 3. Ordinance to Amend the Special Exception Permit to Reflect the Actual Surveyed Acreage of the Area Originally Permitted and to Incorporate Lands Acquired for the Entrance, Tipper Building, and Rail Yard Associated with the Regional Landfill at Smith Gap, Located Northwest Side of Fort Lewis Mountain Between Smith Gap and 3 Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. K. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Establishing procedure to Enforce the Prohibited Discharge of Stormwater Surface Water, Groundwater, Roof Runoff or Subsurface Drainage into the Public Sanitary Sewer System, by Requiring Certain Corrections to Buildings or Structure, Penalties for Noncompliance, Disconnection, and Appeals from Such Determinations. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a .69 Acre Parcel of Real Estate in Connection with the Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill -Tax Parcel 64.01-4-33. L. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Adopting a Fee Schedule for Police Department Services Related to Traffic Control for Parades and Background Investigations for Concealed Weapons Permits and Conservators of the Peace. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of 4.0 Acre Parcel of Land from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) M. APPOINTMENTS N. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM 4 OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII~L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Appraval of Minutes -April 6, 1993. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. 3. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.13 Miles of Tinkerdale Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4. Donation of Right-of--Way in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. 5. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Golden View Acres. 6. Donation of Drainage Easement on Lot 6, Block 1, Section 23, of Hunting Hills Subdivision to the Board of Supervisors. 7. Acceptance of Donation of an Access Easement from the Salem Stone Corporation in Connection with the Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS P. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COlbIlVIUNICATIONS Q. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 5 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -March 1993 5. Report on Bond Projects. 6. Report on 1991 Water Project 7. Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities 8. Report on Monitoring of Manhole Requirements R RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION AND RECOG1vITION OF VOLUNTEERS WITH OVER 25 YEARS SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY. S. BUDGET WORK SESSION WITH THE FIRE & RESCUE CHIEFS BOARD T. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (4) Concerning a personnel matter; (7) Consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members, pertaining to Smith Gap Landfill contract, (1) Personnel Matter; (3) Consideration of the disposition of publicly held property, i.e. well lot. U. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6 1. Public Hearing to Elicit Comments Regarding the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 1993-94. W. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Indoor Archery Club to Construct an Addition, Located on Timberview Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Giles M. Gilley. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 2. An Ordinance to Rezone 4.75 Acres from I-2 to R-2, Located at 1701 Underhill Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 3. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Religious Assembly and Community Center, Located on Branico Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jitendra Desai. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 4. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Existing Church Building for Sunday School Rooms and Fellowship Hall, Located at 8269 Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Warren E. Booth. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 5. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of an Existing Church Building and the Future Construction of Related Facilities, Located at 312 Azusa Street, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Azusa Street Ministries. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 6. Ordinance Authorizing the Relocation of the Office of the General Registrar to New Office Facilities and Relocation and Establishment of a Central Absentee Voter Election District. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 7. Ordinance Authorizing the Relocation of the Castle Rock Voting Precinct from Cave Spring Fire Station to Cave Spring Junior High School. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 8. Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and County Sewer Ordinance to Allow Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) a. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 18- 63.1 "Procedures and Fees for Issuance of Permits for Septic Tanks, On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems and Wells" of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. b. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to provide for Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems. 9. Ordinance Declaring a 100' by 115' parcel of Real Estate Identified as Tax Map No. 76.16-1-14 and located off Route 1666 (Sheldon Drive) to be Surplus and Accepting/Rejecting an Offer for the Sale of Same. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) X. CITIZEN CONIlViENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Y. ADJOIfRNMENT s MEMORANDUM TO: Members, Board of Supervisors --~ FROM: Elmer C . Hodge :.~ /-~ t '~ ~ DATE: April 23, 1993 SUBJECT: BUDGET WORK SESSION APRIL 27, 1993 Attached is a report on the responses to inquiries from the Board Members at the Budget Work Session on April 6th and conversations that we have had since that time. I would like to discuss these with you at the work session on Tuesday. The most significant changes are the additional contributions to the human services and cultural agencies as you have requested. We allocated an additional $50,000 to the cultural agencies and $25,000 to the human service agencies. Please call me if you have any questions regarding these issues. ECH/bjh Attachment County of Roanoke Inquiries from Board Members Budget Work Session Apri127, 1993 Q1. How many people does the County currently employee that are classified as part- time but have worked 40 hours per week for over a 12 month period? A1. There are 10 people who are classified as part-time but work 40 hours per week and have done so for over a year. These employees do not receive benefits currently. Attachment A, prepared by the Department of Human Resources, outlines several options for providing benefits for these employees. Q2. Car. the filling of the Parks and Recreation Director position be postponed for 6 to 12 months? A2. Yes. I would like to postpone the hiring of a Parks and Recreation Director and use the $52,345 budgeted for this position to fund the cost of benefits for full-time/part- time employees that are currently working 40 hours per week. The cost of benefits for these employees would be $31,435. I feel that it is a higher priority, at this time, to provide benefits for existing staff rather than adding new staff given our limited resources. The balance of $20,910 could be used to fund a rate increase for sports officials for the youth athletics program. See Attachment B for a comparison of County rates with those of other localities. Q3. What is the status of the Vehicle Replacement Policy? A3. The Facilities Management Team has completed a draft of a Vehicle Replacement Policy. Staff has distributed a copy of the draft Policy to each Board member for their review. The next step in the process will be for the ISOP Team to determine the cost to implement the Policy and to develop a funding methodology. Q4. What type of Sewer rate increase would be necessary to cover the General Fund supplement of $309,050? A4. The current General Fund supplement of $309,050 is to subsidize Sewer Fund operations. This amount does not include any money for capital projects. If the Board of Supervisors chooses to eliminate the General Fund supplement, sewer rates would need to be increased by 15 percent effective July 1, 1993. It is premature to factor in a rate increase to cover the expansion of the Sewage 1 Treatment Plant; however, a rate increase for this purpose will be necessary in the future. If a sewer rate increase is approved and the $309,050 becomes available in the General .Fund, it would be my recommendation to use these funds for capital. Specifically, to purchase outright some of the equipment currently being proposed for lease/purchase in the FY 1993-94 Budget. Q5. What is the status of the bulk and brush pick-up expansion options? A5. The proposed FY 1993-94 Budget includes the lease/purchase of three automated refuse trucks. Because these trucks require only a driver, not the three man crew of the rear loader, staff can be re-directed to an additional bulk and brush pick-up. If the three automated refuse trucks are not funded, an additional truck and crew of three, at a cost of $90,000, would be necessary for the expansion of the bulk and brush collection program. Q6. What information is available from the Convention and Visitors Bureau relating to how they would spend an increase in funding from Roanoke County? A6. Attachment C is a copy of the Convention and Visitors Bureau proposed budget for FY 1993-94. This budget includes a new staff position for the Visitors Information Center. This position, if approved would increase the staff of the Bureau to nine. The advertising budget remains the same at $95,000. Q7. Does the staff have available a copy of the request from the Economic Development Partnership for funding in the FY 1993-94 Budget? A7. Attachment D is a copy of the Resolution from the Economic Development Partnership requesting that Roanoke County and all other members not already providing funding at $1.50 per capita to please increase their allocations for the purpose of hiring a Marketing Representative. This position is needed to "actively" sell the Roanoke Valley to out-of-area prospects rather than relying on the Virginia Department of Economic Development. Q8. Are other localities being requested to fund Explore? A8. Representatives for the Explore Project will be present at the 3:00 P.M. Board meeting to make a presentation and will be available to answer any questions the Board may have at that time. Q9. Is there funding available if the Board of Supervisors would like to increase contributions to cultural and human service agencies? 2 A9. Yes. Attachments E and F, included for your review, are the revised contribution schedules which incorporate recommendations for increased funding made by various Board members. The additional $45,000 for the cultural agencies shown on Attachment E will be taken from the $155,668 generated by the Hotel/Motel Tax increase that was originally budgeted to repay the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. Also, the Virginia Amateur Sports allocation of $25,000 has been increased to $30,000 and the entire balance will be taken from the $155,668 as well, leaving a balance of $80,668 as a repayment to the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. The funding of Virginia Amateur Sports from the proceeds of the Hotel/Motel Tax increase frees up $25,000 in the General Fund which has been allocated to various human service agencies. See Attachment F for the proposed funding changes. Q10. Does staff have information on what other localities pay for unused sick leave? A10. Yes. The Department of Human Resources has prepared Attachment G for your review. The Schools have provided Attachment H, which is a comparison of sick leave policies for all school systems throughout the State prepared by the Virginia Education Association. Q11. How can we fund two DARE officers for the Police Department instead of the one included in the proposed FY 1993-94 Budget? All. Staff proposes to provide an additional DARE officer which will increase the proposed new positions in the Police Department to four. Funding for the new position will be provided by the elimination of one new police car and an increase in the Police Department budget of $9,000. Below are questions that were posed by individual Board Members following the April 6, 1993 Budget Work Session. Q12. What is staff's evaluation of the need and cost of extending bus service in the County? A12. To extend Valley Metro along Brambleton Avenue to the Brambleton Corporate Center to address the needs of the Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services would cost an additional $9,000.To extend Valley Metro along Williamson Road to Hollins Manor or Hollins College would cost an additional $33,475. 3 Valley Metro has agreed to provide an additional stop on Hershberger Road to Friendship Manor for no additional cost, but has not agreed to divert that route into the Friendship Manor property itself. To expand the CORTRAN service to six days per week would result in the need for an additional van at a cost of $20,000. The current Public Transportation budget is $70,200. Adding $62,475 in additional services would equate to an 89 percent increase in this budget category. I recommend postponing the expansion of existing services until we have a more favorable economic outlook. Q13. What would be the dollar impact if the County purchased outright one ambulance and one automated refuse truck and the related containers rather than lease/purchasing two ambulances and three refuse trucks? A13. The following is a summary of the increased cost of purchasing the above referenced equipment: LP Value Purchase Proposed Price Difference Ambulance $ 40,000 (2) $ 65,000 (1) $ 25,000 Refuse Truck & 250,000 (3) 334,500 (1) 84,500 Containers 290 000 399 500 109 500 If all three automated refuse trucks are not purchased in FY 1993-94, an additional $45,000 to $50,000 will need to be added to the Solid Waste Department budget to cover the cost of continued high maintenance on the rear loaders that will not be replaced. Q14. What is the possibility of increasing the E911 Tax in order to pay for additional personnel in the Communications Center? A14. The proposed FY 1993-94 Budget was prepared within existing tax rates as the Board directed. The Public Safety Team's recommendations for additional staff ranked the Corrections Officers and the DARE Officers higher than Dispatchers at this time. However, if the Board would like to add Dispatchers, with the recent change in the State Code that allows localities to recover personnel costs with the E911 Tax, an increase in the tax could cover the cost of additional personnel. A proposal would be to raise the E911 Tax from $.46 to $.75, generating an additional $120,000, which would fund three additional positions and a capital replacement reserve. 4 Attachment A iii E M O R A N D U M To: Board of Supervisors From: Elmer C. Hodge /~2~ Date: April 22, 1993 Subject: Full-Time Temporary Positions We have identified ten employees who are classified as temporary and/or part-time, but who have been working 40 hours a week for more than one year. These employees are located in three departments. I recently met with these department heads to determine the ongoing need for each position, whether these employees could be placed into existing or future vacancies, and whether the departments could absorb all or a portion of the cost of benefits. Based on their recommendations, I have prepared three alternatives, which are shown on the attached chart. In order to provide these ten employees with benefits immediately, I am proposing that the three departments who employ these individuals be "advanced" the appropriate number of regular full-time positions. These departments would give up future vacancies in the same job classification until they are able to reduce their complement to the approved number of employees (see Option 1 on the attached chart). This would cost $31,500, which could be absorbed within the proposed budget by deferring the hiring of a Director of Parks and Recreation. If the Board approves this recommendation, implementation would be based on the performance of the individual employees. Departments would review performance then put the employee into one of the "advanced" positions or have the employee revert to 32-hour-a-week status. For those non-seasonal employees who are currently working 40 hours a week, but who have been employed for less than a year, departments would be asked to reduce to 32 the number of hours these employees work per week. Departments would be given a grace period until January 1, 1994, to allow employees a smooth transition to a 32-hour work week (see Option 1). I want to emphasize that all County departments are being asked to do more with the same number or fewer employees. This list of ten employees arose due to the need for ongoing work to be accomplished. However, to prevent this situation from recurring, I will place greater controls on the departments. I recommend that regular part-time employment be restricted to 32 hours a week, on average. I also recommend that temporary or seasonal employment be limited to a specific period of time. This could include a Parks and Recreation employee who works 40 hours a week for three months with the summer ACE program or an employee in the Treasurer's Office who works 40 hours a week during the busy tax season. In addition to restricting the number of hours and duration of assignment, I am asking that the Department of Human Resources, along with the Payroll Office, provide me with regular reports to monitor the situation. ECH/KDC/meh 5 Attachment Attachment A-1 ALTERNATIVES FOR PART-TIME AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT -_........:: - ::............:::. :........:..:.::............. ................ .< .............::.v::::;::::::.v::; .+.v.~:::.v: .................:::.::..,....... ...::... .....v; ......:...... frr.......i .+..:::.:v; ~.:.:.•:::: rr .::::::: ... .. .::::.u::.n.. ......::...... n.....~ .......: p...::::.... ::.::r{{: ~v ;v:::::: r::::.x:....,v : :: :nv .:.......:.. :... .:.~v.,.. ! '': ' Y~M ` : ............::::. .........::::. ~:.:.,..: .:::. ~. ::.::.::::::: :,:~::::::::.~.:::. .....:::::::::::.v... .................•.,...........v.::::::C4:p:'••: r: i:n;~i•.v: •i:;•i: i ... n...... t:v:'v.:::; .. v:: ;•: ;::::: n......: ::::..~..:::::::::::::........ ,, .....:.v.................... :~:J:v!;•;i•>:Oi:•:<••'i ; >i':v: ' i:i>:•i:t:K{r; '::::.,v:::.:: x:..: ..v:::::: w:::::. v:::.... ~'::: .................. ......................x:i:;+:4SS;:R;y;•.?.::>°`i:::::: '::: v.G:. :•:\\~~ :~iJ~' .:: {.:::::. ~ \4:~A• r.\\..:: i:r v: r: kv: :v. r:. /...: nv. , • :: • : v ::: v ... \v.::::.+v:@v:~,...4v ....... :~. v .r '.i}y:iF.ir.:i?•..:. .w •..v. ~.3i%/: ;...ti : ......{..h..... :... ff. ..%., .+1\ .~. • :~:., A:y :c . :r.::.: :~ ~:r . ........\fi::R;:;:>:?:. ....... a\a. :0F \•.:Y:::: nA ,r. v:•v:.. \\ ... ••. .:: • 1T.,?,. :^:~ •.Y.~ ~ .v: •:. ti ......N .~.y::...... _...~::.~ :::...........:.•1:.:;............:..:::?1::.:~::.~:::::.....v. ../:Y.•::{•:x•}•r}x:xvnv:::::.>.v:l...v..:::..: ~: ~: }1,v. ............. .:::4.:.u,.{.}.}}...<: :?•:tS t•:.c:3,..o.v ,,,\,. ..:......... fi .i::.v.:,v v. :n•::::::•::.:.:.i::.::: '.v::: :•::: •:::::::: v:.v:.v •::: . •.v}; :.::::fi:; n• . ...\.•,•:. \\..•::..,,. •: •:.:,•::..•:::::.,..,•+.,.: ::: ti,~, , ::.:~:`:•i:•::•:•i': >.'t..i.\•,A:.~r~./:r. he..r Sr.:: it ,:: }::x::R x:::r: x. `~4M1•.•T:4 .~3:'~i.>~~•: ,..\,\\,v::.v:.v:.. `C.vti. \,vh\~ `~ .,K„3',,, ~ }.. ~.f. .~•. /.4'i~i ~ h. ~i $ .,, ' v,\~~ • .. .... . ;. ;. :.:.. .. f. Employees Currently Advance regular Absorb the ten Reduce to 32 Working 40 Hours full-time employees into hours per week per Week and positions on regular full- May 1, 1993; Employed for Longer May 1, 1993 to time positions Cost $0 than 12 Months three affected for which they departments. are qualified (l0 employees) These will be during the absorbed into year. If similar posi- positions are tions by not available, June 30, 1994; these employees Cost $31,500 would be reduced back to 32 hours per week on May 1, 1994; Cost $0 Employees Currently Reduce to 32 Reduce to 32 Reduce to 32 Working 40 Hours hours per week, hours per week hours per week per Week and allowing May 1, 1993; May 1, 1993; Employed for Less departments a Cost $0 Cost $0 than 12 Months grace period (non seasonal) until January 1, 1994 (13 employees) to make the transition; Cost $0 Restrict part- Restrict part- Restrict part- Regular Part-time time work to a time work to a time work to a Employees maximum of 32 maximum of 32 maximum of 32 hours per week hours per week hours per week on average on average on average Restrict Restrict Restrict temporary temporary temporary employment to a employment to a employment to a maximum of 40 maximum of 40 maximum of 40 Temporary Employees hours per week hours per week hours per week for a specific for a specific for a specific period of time period of time period of time for seasonal for seasonal for seasonal programs and programs and programs and assignments assignments assignments 4/21/93 ~ avo ~o ~ o° ~ ~ ~ ~ g 9 9 t-~ ~ ~ 3 C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ he ~ ~ t" t O ~ ~ a o Ci7 Cbr7 ~ O b r ~ ~ ~: ~ 7d ° ~z ~ ~" a i cz , ~`' c~ z° b ~ m C7 G ~ y ~ ~ ~ C " ~~ ~~ ~ G1 C1 C 0 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 88 88 0 88 S °~ b~ 0 ~~ ° 80 80 8 88 ~ 0 ~o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ J J o4 A S O H O O H O y En ., .~ .- ._. ., i p, N c, N x O pwppo G vpp, O to x rJ ~` t~ ~ Qn S n ° df Y df Q r-~ _ _ _ _ _ df ~ ~ a~ 0 8zs ~8 88 a ~o ~~ C~ <., o .. ~-. ._. .. ~ ~' ~ C g ~ ~ 8 $ 8 ~ 8 g ~m [v ~, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~O Vii ~O C~l~ ~ c pWp Oo pJ p~ O O C S pA f~ O S ~1 ~ lpn O '~ 0 ~n o° C ,, z ~~o ~xo "~z "d ~ ° r .~ ~ . .~ (%~ g ;nauigas~~ Attachment C j ~ l~S ~~""~, _„ Bck~noke ~-~_ - --- ~~alleV CorlVer~tioll ~~~ `visitors Bureau April 8, 1993 Mr. Tim Gubala Roanoke County Economic Development P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Tim: Pease find enclosed a copy of the proposed Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau budget for fiscal year 1993/94. Tris is a preliminary budget which has been reviewed by our finance committee but which has not currently been approved by our Full Board of Directors. Our Full Board will aprove this budget at our April Board meeting. Sincerely, QZ~~ P~?art a Mackey Executive Director MM/pw Enclosures S "Capital of the Blue Ridge" (703) 342-6025 Marketplace Center 1 14 Market Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1402 Attachment C-1 ROANOKE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU INCOME 93/94 301 CITY OF ROANOKE 510,000.00 321 ROANOKE COUNTY 79,332.00 322 CITY OF SALEM 20,000.00 (vote June 2nd or 4th Monday) 000 TOWN OF VINTON -0- 371 MEMBERSHIP DUES 26,000.00 381 INTEREST INCOME 382 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 385 REIMBURSEMENT OTHER 386 PROMOTIONAL PROJECTS INCOME (Golf Tournament) TOTAL INCOME $635,332.00 (MONEY MARKET EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY) $6,599 (PAYROLL ACCOUNT) $1,500 9 flttaehment GZ ROANOKE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU EXPENSES 93/94 401 SALARIES 403 INSURANCE (HEP.LTH, LIFE, LTD, DENTAL) 405 PAYROLL TAXES 409 RETIREMENT 410 LIABILITY INS 411 DIRECTORS LIABILITY 430 VISITOR INFO CTR STAFF 431 VIC SUPPLIES 432 AFFIL DUES & SUBS 439 OFFICE SUPPLY & EXPENSE 442 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 443 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 465 PROMOTION 468 ADVERTISING 469 PRINTING 470 EXHIBIT REGISTRATION 471 TRANSPORTATION 473 HOTELS, MEALS, ETC 476 LOCAL MILEAGE 480 SERVICE TO CONVENTIONS 481 CONVENTIONS SALARIES 483 MEMBERSHIP INITIATIVE 485 LEGAL FEES 486 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 488 POSTAGE 489 TELEPHONE 490 RENT 491 PARKING 492 UTILITIES 493 JANITORIAL SERVICES 495 MISCELLANEOUS 498 TEMPORARY HELP 497 PROMOTIONAL PROD. SPEC. 000 CONTINGENCY 000 CITY'S CONTINGENCY T OTP_L 228,000.00 18,509.00 21,180.00 7,607.00 1,772.00 1,950.00 6,000.00 2,100.00 7,270.00 8,000.00 8,824.00 2,326.00 19,990.00 95,000.00 26,000.00 15,550.00 17,000.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 20,000.00 580.00 200.00 600.00 6,325.00 21,507.00 15,000.00 30,228.00 3,800.00 5,000.00 2,700.00 1,514.00 300.00 -0- 15,000.00 15,000.00 $635,332.00 10 '. ! i Franklin Plaza, Swte 333 ~.oanorce, Vireinia 24011 ~~3 313-150 Fax:i03344-6096 R ~NO~KE_y _ALLEY _~~ ~~~ Attachment D IJ~ TX`E B`ZLSI~~'.SS CO~I~f~LflrlrZ'E~E 0~ T~f`E 7~0 ~ ` O7~E ~~~LL`E}' ~ECOJ~O1~fIC D`E`LtELOP9Vf~;~rl rP.~`Z~`E~,SHIP, February 23, 1993 `ICE SOL'ZI`I~O~I( `iN"}{~~~5, tfie ~oanol~e Nn!!ey zvi!! eXperience the loss of nearby 3,000 jobs in 1993 witk the closings of Gardner-Denver ~Tining e~ Construction Division, and Sears ?elecatalog Center, and tke acgtcisition of Dominion Bar.,~skares 6y first `Zlnion Corporation, and `iti'~£-2~E.~S, tku situation kru made the need {or job creation more immediate and more critical tha: ever to the frltcrre z~iabilitu of :Fc.: 7?Qanvl~e 'valley as a community in wkieh to live and do business, and `~U~R~.S, the 7~ganol~e valley economic Development Partnership was formed in 1983 as a pudlic-private partnership to fund efforts to mar~et the ~anoke valley as a Business location to neu~ and expanding businesses, and `1'~E~E~,S, due to tke immediate need for tke creation of jobs it is imperative that efforts 6e accelerated, and `~U~ER`F~S~ adequate financial resources necessary to compete in business attraetiort are critical to success, and 11 Ivlouru~ains~ Attachment D-1 B'E IT ~E,SOL`L}E~D ~~ Z~-C~ B4lSI~E.~S COI-f~fl2rl'E~ O~ ~E ~Q` ~ OBE `V~.LL~~' ~CO~O~LfIC ~J'E`i~EL(YP~fE31~I P~`IJ~~S~fIP that tFcis committee respecrt~~clly requests tfee 'E~ecutive Committee of the ~anoke Halley economic Development Partnership to request the governments of Botetourt, Craig, ~ran(~lin, and I~oano(~e Counties, rite cities of ~oanol~e and Salem, and the town of Hinton to increase their funding o{ the Partnership 6y 50 percent annually for the 1993.94 nett fiscal year or 6y tfie loan o{ u professional industrial developer to the Partrr.ership for that period, and B`E IT ~~1~~ 7~~SOL`LtF'D B~' `Z~{`E B`LLSI9~E,SS COI-f~l-fI72*E~ O~ `~~ ~0~1(O~E `Vr`iLL~~'ECOT(OJ~fIC D`E`L}ELO'P~fE31~7P~L~`IJ1~~~,59-(IP that the 6~uiness~~s rzpres~nte~l L~~ ~ijnurrrres htloz~~ will increase their contributions to the Partnership by 50 percent {or the ~ie~t year. ~s agreed upon and accepted by all tFiose signed Below: t ti (~ ~. / IJ I ~~~ m ~~~ ~ueRi~ MQUruains' Majestu. G~.~~..C bI ~ O x ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° b ~ ° ~ ~ o c ^~ o z ~Z b ~ ~ vy~ o~o ~ .. ~~ ~ r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~do~o ~ o~ p <o ~~~' ~ r ~~ ~~c,~ ~ ~~ O ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ o~ z ~_ o ~ r~ n ~ x ~ c m o~ { ~ m~~~~ ~ x ~Z ~ ~ ~„~ 8~~ ~ p~G ~ ~~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~- '~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ V1 n O ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ 7 S "A C~7 `~ ~ < Ro ~ S '~ ~ ~ (7 ~ O W ~ ~ O C7 ~ ~ < ~a ~ o A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~~ o ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ v ~ Q y V II I ~~ i ~ -'" 0 ~ n 1 ii a~ ~~ ~ x r~co i II ~ I O 8 W ~ p SO Opp Np ~ pN Np N to A ~ ~ ~ CC~I ~ ~ '~ -+rr ~ o ,,, II I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. i O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 ~ II I ~ ~ ~ II I Cb ~. "j ~ II I '~~ Q II y~ I II ~ I _ 8lA W -+ pOo Opp N * o O pN N N 8 C8/~ 8A r ~ II ~ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O S O O O O O Z II II II I I - I ~ + ti I II ~' I I ~ I I '~•~ ~ r+ -+ l/1 r'"+ -g+ gN ~~~ ~ J In N '.i1 J U W ~~~ W c!i ;J In ~ ~ 0~0 ~ o ~ 1 ~ ~ II N I a b a A 8~ 8 8 ~ 8 o II I ~ ~ II 6, I I I yO O ~aa,, O~ II b u~ I ~ to l 8 .. lI~ W ~ O O~ N Ln .a Cn Ln ~8 w ~88 N N (n ..n v 88 0 vs In A ~~ I y ~ ~ o o0oo o o 0 u n ii u I 1 1 ~ u "'' I ~ x w I II "'• II ~ 1 ~5i~d "'~ N to 1 ~$ to In N N N U W 8 2~ ~5 /i WW W W ~Q+ RO C ~ g 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b a 3 ~uacugas~d £i v~ ~~roo ~Y'~~~on~~~ ~~oo~~~a ~ oo r ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~Z~ ~ s ~~~ ~I r ~ ~'' x r 8 ~~ o ~o ~~ ~ ~ ~zo ~o~~ ~ oooozc~ ~c~ ooz ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ a~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ' ~ x o~ ~~ p ~~ ~ ~ ~m.~ r ~ ~~ ~~~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 by ~~ ~n ~ ~ ~r".~ zzZ CCb"7" pp pp< .~ p ~ ~~[V~~~z"xf~5p~ ..~ C7 S ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ ~p v,~ m cn %o `' °z p z ~Z O OpC ~ Crl ~ ~~ ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ S ~ by ~ ~ m a~ ~ ~~ ,~~ ~z m r~~ ~ ~ ~n z o [ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ m `~ ~~ m g o o ~ m 0 z 11 I I I j ~ rn II ~' I II I ~ I I ~ `+~ ~" I I ~ 1 c n y, A, n '( , ~N, , Fn I ~ I ~ ~ G' n _ i ~ ~ (~ Q II I ` I p OO O~ N yf to 0 0 8 O 1 ~ j j 8 8 O O O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 8 A I o 0 8 8 A OO ~ ~ II 1 II I I 1 1 I I j '~ 7d ~ V~ • ~ ~ I I I II ~ 1 I U I N I :' ~ U A.pv, Attlni ,Qv I ~ n~ ~p ~ N ~ ~ -+~"~o II ~ I ~ I O O O O N B O O O I O O O o O O O O O O O O O O A I Ja O O II I I I 1 ~~~ ii i "' i i l ~ I ~ ~ C~ n ~ C i "' II a I II N~ i _~' I ~~ ~ s ~ `'~' d, I ~' I ~~ ~ Alai, Ncr. ~ 8 8 8 8 8 = ~ ~ I ~ I vim, ~~Nn N~~ ~ 1 ~O ~ o a o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o ii ~ ii i II I ii i _ i I ~ i `^ r r '~„ , i ~„ 1 ~ ~ _ . ~s"sT ?~ s~ :^Q :'~ r~+~ i i 6, I :^ ~ _ S~~ ~~ ~W_ ,o ~ ~ n n 11 ~ I ~ I c y ~~oow QQ ~~5~ `~" 1 o Q Q Q Q tS~A Q ~ `~~SZ5o25Z5t5Z5t52~Z58 e i .- o ~~ ~ it I I ~ I II I I I ~' I o j I ~N j Cii I - 8 ~' I v. I I n ~' ~ • ~ i ~ 0 ~ "S7 O II O I Np Oc I tpn O O O O~ Y. B O O O 1 8 tpn tNpn . !`~ v, 0 H 8 8 I r ~ 8 8 N 1~~} ~ v~ 0 0 O O O O O O O O i . O O 11 { ~~ ~ { ~ I ; ~ 11 I 11 O 1 I ,~' I ~ I y, O O O O W VJ ~ o I O I Yp tPpt~~° o~ 8Q pop ., p8p c8pa ~8p' ~8Q. }8pn Ettpnn., ooO~b OOO o0 0 0o : ; I I ~ ~8n ~8' N w ~p ~~ iO O t O O ~ ~aauigae~d SI ~-3 ~' O ~ K C7 r O O o ~ ° ~ x ~ ~ r x x o ~ ~ ~ t~ l~ C E ~ ~ ~ O ~ ........:.. C1 H ti O O O ~t H ~ O K r ~ N M N Z b K (D ~3 a 1--~ (~ ct ct a 'TJ z z o .•. G ~ ~' ~ "C s3' r z ~ {n > r•N•~ to o Ism ~ ~~ rD K ~~'~ o 0 o M~ o m o N r~ o 0 o w N ; ~ n r ~o ~ a ~ ro co ~.,•. a .. m -, cn c~ a K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ • a ~ a o o ;, <;>::>;......:. • x r (p ~ a --~ K w C N p, r K cD cD rt N r• ~ K to K G C ro \ \ O F•~• O lD •-• v fD •.• f.,•.~ !D ~ r'h ft ~' Ct ~ b' N O N N (D a a i~. o l-'ro M ~ "C N rt o ]r ~ K ~• G \ •• a s MfDa fDN•~aatnNKaEOO fDts'ctK ? Ot~• ~ 'C 'C ~ aK>/ o~N cto OK NN r~o~N o MN~•cn ~ ct C o ~ N ~ da M r cD N cn m (l. m ~ o~ ~ ~.r.:>> <~E+ ; .;»> • . t K wN ctE o ~ s/ o K o rto E a o~~ fD K fD o fD a M fD ~ • O ~' F-' M C ~' 7c' ~• N- + ~ ~ 'LZ C w M O C M ct .® a (D ~ i . fD Oro !- • !-• K (D K O K rt 1-+ ~ O C C fD O ~ O !;.;;:,:;;: ;;;:c; f]. fD a ~ >r fD K fD F-' fD ~ ~• O K r• r• K K a ' > 'C r N O O 'C a 'L3 ~ rt (D (D ~ f]. N ~G (D M (1 R. ~ x in ~ fD (D F•~• F~• rro_ O rt a ~ F•~• ct a O `-' tD K G G fD (D G N• .p a~ W ~ ti. rt ~ f-••'•C N K o o C~ a ~. r ro >1. K~ ~ ~ ,~ .. K ro N• 7~' cD rt O ~• (D N b fD C M O 1-' cD G G 0~ f•+ .. N r ZJ• N G1 O p, ~ N ft (D ft ' M M ct C7' rt N ~ O G 1C O r r ' Fr• M O fD fD h+• L7 K (D O E ' O a F•• (D O '~ C fD fD n rt O O K N~ O F-' rt K K ~ N• N K O. m a ~coK M ~•ct~~a~ oct ~ mm '~ Q.MC n ~• N•N ~ Q.~I a->r ~' rn sz~ N '~ O (D 1~ .-. x n •• • I K o (D N• aK ~ r oc~ r•rr ~m o~~ a a -- K o 1 ~• ~ rr x ct C ~ ~ fD N ~ N M N 7 F-~ K fD r-3 a -•~ (1 O 1--~ f7 ~1 'T1 z Z ~ ~ ~ ',C1 ~' ~cn Z in to N• N• !r lJ1 O cD cD ~ ~' ~ fD K b cD O 1 O O O N• ~ G cD O H' O r r ~ n raP ~ a ~ro cD A.-~a~•cD~.cta ~ rK ~ ~ ~ G -~w G ~ o 0 • x r cD C a I-' K w C N p. r N• C C 1 cn co N N• ~ K cn m \ \ o m ~• o cn .-, -- m ~- ~. ~. o cn m ~ ~r rr ~ tr N o a s~. > --~ o -•~ ro M ~ -< N ct ~ K N p• o ~• G \ a a > w M fD a ro fD r•~- a s cn N K N b ct O M iT c-r K ~• ~C 'C a 'C G r O (D N ct o O •• I-' fD a N fD (D N O ct C ~ a~ N ~ c~~ M F-' a a~ cn rt a cn C G K !-~• N rh E O ~ >/ O K O ~ rt ~ K E G o p fD a M fD ~' ~' I-' M C O ct F'• (D 'LS G F'• M rt : ~t cD O s`L N O ro N- 1--~ K fD ct O• K (D !~ ~ G O ~ O `•::: acn a ~ G m K ~rto m o tr K a a '•t rN oo~G aro~ct ~~Na ~'C~M x {n fD fD N• N• r ro O ct a G 1~- ct K fD fD O (D K i/ G N• N !tf a~w~ ac+G w~CNKO m a ~¢, r ro ~ ~ d N r L7 N R. ~ ~. ~ N a fD ~• ct ~' M M rt ~ O : H ~-orl~ ~• M o mm KEoo No E o o ~ 'C fD (D f1 rt O O K N ~ ~i (D K v K ~• F-'• ?#V'' fD a 7~' O K M w rt C N O rr ~ ~ n a ~ ~ n o ;to :.: a r o c u ~' N a ~- K cn : ~t (D ; 0 p -p t~ a rt N• 0 M O K C O sr m O a ~• 0 x r fD C a N N I w ~ ~aawq~e~d 9I r . r~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ?~h oo~ a^~ ~ ~ ~~o ., ~.yo ~ ~~ ~ O ~~~~ ~ r ^~ N ~..~ ~f~ 1'T V\y r1 Y 1 ~_ ~T T N g ~aawgas~~ ~~nnn 1 ^ ns~~r~ ~ : ° ° ~ s n 1 1 n ^~s-1 ;m~~~~ ~~ / I n O • ~ pp .~ n w r- 1 7 ^ y • ,~ 1 . n.. 171 n n • ~ , ;: ~ I 1 ~ 1 n ~ 1 n: 1 M • ~ 1 1 , • I 1 ~ • • • • • / • • • • • ~ 1 1 I , I I 1 , • 1 ~ , 1 1 1 , ~ 1 ~ I i K x x x ~ ~t ~ •x ~ ~ ~ ; 1 ; 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 1 ~ ' , 1 1 , 1 . 1 ~ 1 , / 1 1 ' I x . , • x 1 x ~~ x x. ; 1 . x. • • 1 x 1 • 1 1 ~ , 1 1 1 , , 1 ~ I , ' 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 , , 1 1 ~ ~ I . I • • • • I • ~ • • • • . ; I u , 00 ~ 1 1 • 1 O O O O ' I / NN~~ • • A A ~.r~ 1 1 ~ • vvlvloo 1 ~ ~ o00 l o 1 ~ vloooo I oOOOO •-+ o00 ~ 7nooo ; o0 1 1 • • • 1 ~ • 1 I I • , , 1 , 1 ; 1 1 ' C _ ; M 1 1 m A A 1 1 w : ^ M p n n n~ .~ n N o n 1 p ~O : .~ O I no.< ~ O ~ o , ~ n n~ -+ n , x -~x n ;tw.. a nl~ rn nn • i~ ~ ; .w 7S n 1 ^ 1 1 ~ • w y 90 r~0 n w , 1 7 ~s.a7 ~O • N +N n C~ C O "• + N ; 1 r o no -~ o ~o In 3n n ~~ 1 1 <' ~~ < o ~ ~ +9 ' ~ n _ ~ ~ O 'D ~ ~ ~ n ; 1 ne~~ea» n ^ 1 , N ~ ~~ ~ N < 7 ' 1 ~~ O=~•w n ~ ~ ~ oo~`fxo0 0 1 n n o ~ ~ ~ ~.~aK ~ 1 , t a n S .., ~ p ~ o 1 •.nwn 1 y~ 0-10 1 ~ n ^ w a¢ ~ 1 1 I n .+O ~ b ~~.< ; ~ ~ n-wn n ~ • n n o 1 ~ N~ L W , 1 ~. 0 1 1 1 o n ^ ^ ; 1 ~ ~ a , • 1 ~ O b 1 1 1 O , 1 1 N /-100^ , i 1 0 '~ ; 1 1 r• ~ + 1 1 n ~m ; , Ion- 1 1 , 1 1 r Q 1 w ; 1 'f n , ~ 1 w o , ~. ~. n 1 I , , . w ~ 1 • • 1 , , 1 1 1 Li mmm ; fbmomm 1 n ~ ~ ; o>~ 1 •~ 1 a 1 ^ >^ n > 1 n 1 n l n 1¢ ? j i ~ A ~ ~ _ 1S n • ~ . x ~ j ' ' O3 1 .1 ~ a iL . i . i 0 1 t O o ~ a 1 ~ 1• n~ » O n n I s 7 • O ~ 6 . K n I •~ ~ S~ ;^ ; ; ~ .. 1 ^ j >r 1 n x. o • b 1 • : • : ~ . ' / . 1 . . 1 1 . I 1 . , • . ; / . , . . . 1 . ~ ; 1 1 1 , 1 • N 1 • • • • , 1 I • • • • 1 • ; 1 • • • • • 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 ~ 1 , 1 1 , • 1 1 1 1 1 , / , 1 1 1 7D 1 1 1 1 ~ n ' x ~xt ~xt , 1 x x y~y~ , , x x xxx , 1 7• x x 1 n 1 x; -• 1 ~ , , 1 1 • 1 / 1 ~ 1 1 1 • ' ~ n 1 1 , • , 1 1 ; 1 , , • 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 n t • 1 1 1 ] I N 7 ~ • n }t 1 Y : . • ~ : 1 • . . • . ' 1 • . 1 • x • x _ . ; ~l 0 ~-a • . ft n 1 , • I 1 , 1 1 n .. , 1 1 ' n / , • 1 o ~ ~ , I 1 , ~ ~ 1 1 1 ' / / ' 1 ' ~ m 70 ~' 1 1 1 O Nn ' • / ' 1 n x•00 ' •• . • . • 1 . . • 1 1 • . • 1 7 O ~. C • 1 9 Y ~ • • . 1 • • • 1 1 . O ~ O 1 1 1 • / `C 1 , . • 1 1 1 ' 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 1 • , 1 , • 1 1 ;~' o / ~ J N i N 1 , 1 ~N N u.o 1 1 ~.~ 1 00 N N 0 1 m 1 n ~.~~ 0 no to V1 I oo ~ •• • ~ COO so °: ~ 0 i o •oo $ 100 00 100 °' O ~o~~.°• O 0 0 0 / g 1 0 0 0 0 1 • 1 0 0 • I b 1 • 1 ; . 1•~ r • o 0 • ~ 1 / ' 1 ; 1 • • • 1 • • ~ ~ 1 1 ! • • I 1 1 , f 1 .N.M•~. N vl C A 1 •N2N ~V q an S 1 O s ; s Swf~.~.-~ G vNi~ ~ °'- io 0 1 y ~nn ~ O O ~ O~r ~ 3 ~ d On •n '~ ~ ~ ~'7K C 1 •~y b , ~ 1 Y O , 1 O• 1 ~ C ~ n n n n x n ~`C O.; n ~ ~ ~ aa , .1 C ~ 1 n n n 4 0 7 0 < ~ 6, ~ I.n Q- i sa ~•-C I b N 11 ~ 1 ; N ~ n~ -c • i r o n 1 a 1 O' ~•~C f1 ° y 1 .~ ro sl N 1 O On • b ' b n ' 6 ; ~ h n N• m ~ ,, o ~ nO O 1~ • 0 ~ 1 1 o a s b r1 Y n• c o 1 1 , ; .coon x l wn won o 1 1 w ~- n o o a n l oon : B -~ e • ~ ~, ; .. ~ ~ 1 n 7 ~ 1 i l bab r r• 1 0 a 1 1 1 i 76 ~ ^ •~ N N i .~c ~ a N I . 1 7 ~ ~ to 6 -.03 1 O r~ 1~ o ~ 1 ~ S •• 7 1 O -7 O ~ 1 O • o~ n I r A 1 ~ 1 1 . n< n n n n o 1 ~ •,. ~ ~ c-1 -/ n 1 o x t o n - n ~ . .o n n o o< q 1 1 n >~ 1 ° 1 i{ o a n .- 1 a e~ 1 b ~ , 0 1 -t 0 7 ~ .- O n U -1. N O T( •w , N N ~ ' ~ 1 1 A ••~ w A y ~ 1 n f~ 1 ~ 1 ; ^~~ Q -w . 1 M • ~ n I N O 1 ° + 1 , ~ ~ .. n ~ , 1 a 1 ~ I ° ~ : 1 n a 0 1 , 1 0 , .~ 1 1 1 1 n 1 , N ~ B 1 ' ; C , ; N ~ ~- Ix 1 ' 1 U 1 ~ ; I 1 N 3 ; O 1 ~ ' 1 ~a .~ 1 , 1 R 1 O 1 • 7 b ~ 1 1 1 O n 1 ~ 1 ' ' 1 -' n ~ C -1 1 1 1 1 ' 3 ' n 1 ' 1 1 1 C n n w 1 , , 1 1 ~ , v ~ n~ ^ 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 w , 1 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 1 i ~ n 1 ~ n n m .~ A -J O 2 b .~ p ~_~ a n' r ... ~ + n >- ~~ r n n I-H ~aawgas~d 8I , _ _ ,xsnnn In nnc~.. „~ "" „ ;so suo ~~o~ci ~n ___ ~ ~ ~ x < ~ ~ ter. ~ < , .w3~a ' i S Aaxri it i 1{ d m ~ ~ b m ~ ~ '~ .- r ~ to r- a ^ • ~c, ~ A• C pn • n 1 ~ • ; L` O^ ~ ~• w A ~ n 5: -~ '~ ; ~ ~ g: ~ ~ ; ' N . ^ , , ; i , , , ; 1 1 p ; ' ' ~ , • 7 1 1 1 ; , i ' ' ' ~ 1 ' 1 ' ' ; , . 1 . . . 1 • • . . 1 1 , 1 ' ' , ' ' ' , , ' , , 1 A ; , ' ~ , 1 r1 , X ' ' x „ JR x% ' ' X x x }1 x„~ N ' ' %% 7• % M x }f 1 ~'I x ~l 7• • ~f x „ j[ ~ x ){ M M% 1 1 K X K K • 1 x 1 x ~ ~ 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 , , 1 ' ' , , 1 1 ^ 1 1 ' ' ' ' , 1 1 1 ' ' 1 ' ' , r 1 ' ' 1 1 ' , 1 1 ~ ; ~ ' , 1 ; n ~ ' N }, ~1 }r , r n • , 1 ~ , 1 r n ' ~ , ' ' , ' ; 1 ' 1 1 , , , 1 ' , ; 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 1 ~ ; , 1 ~ ~ ~ , 1 m 70 , 1 1 , 1 1^ N n t~ 1 n + 1 , , ~ . 7 O ^ N. • 1 , 1 , , 1 o e 1 ' , '~ , u , , v. , 1 ~ ~ ~ 00 ' ' ' 1 , ° , ; ; , ~ , 00 00 1 . ' 0 ,• ~ ' ; 1 m ' o ~ o ov ' , ... 00 ' , N N^~ 0 00o n , ...W 1 00 ... 0 ~ ~ 41~ ...M ~ vov+oan 1 ^ ~o o o.n l ~ 0 • •• ~ •• ~ ~ i o0 • 0• 0 1 vloooo ~ ^ o. 0000 , o0 10000°0 ~ c °o °o ~ °g ~o-~ 1 00 1 • ~ o ~ ~oooo ~ u ^.. ~ ~ ^ 1 ' ; 1 , 1 ' ' ~ ~ ^ ' 1 ' ~ • • • • , 1 • • ~ • • • • , , , ' 1 ' Kx x1A ~ ^~ _K ~ nA, ono ,'$ o_a _ ^ 1 , NA 00 ' vOy N ~ , ~ ~ ' ' a ~ b O ~ < •n 1 a ~ 1 A > - , 1 w ^^ 1 7 1 A • ; oa n 333 1 x.~ ~ n ~ , s ^ 1 n n ~ n ; f S Im ^ s ' ~ ' 1 NY• V N 1 ^ ; 1 ^ ^ I ~ ' V ^wl .~ ~ ^ ~ ' O ^ o -w~ _ ~~ ~ n 1 n o~ ~ e..o o~o ~ U i nw ~. -. r>• ss '~ ~ ; on ^ ~ n-< ^ N , r~~o o ~' ~ n ,D , ~ ~ , yn r A ~ ~ ~ 1 a~ 1 , 1 N ; ~ ~ a 1 + ; ~ ^ .~ o •~ ; C ~ ti v ; g 1 0 '~ ~~ ' ' n ~ 1 ~ R ~ ~ , ~~°~ In ^ 1^ ~o• ' _ n ~ ~ A ~n ^ ' ~ K ^ , in -~ ~ i ~ Is 1 ' ` < , c n ' ~ ^ i o ~ I l e ' ' 1 q ~ a ~ i c , ^ I~n ~ , n '^ ~ 1 w ^ ; N , ~ ~ O t ~ ; ~ 1 n l a ^ ' ~ _ ' ' ~ ~ ~~ ' n d ~~ ^ ~ .1 Q 1 rY ~ • , ~ n ' 1 '" ' i r. p i n a I n ' ^ , o In < Id ^ 17 , ' n ~ d 1 "t ' ; ~ i a 1 w ~ A I< '- ~ a ; , ' O '" 5 1 1 ; ~ 1 O 1 Q q 1 w ' ' ~ 1~ I 1^ ' ' ~ ; I w 0 1 -w 1 1 3 1- ' ^ ' ~ , , 1 1 ~ ' ; ~o , ' 1 , ' ' ~ , ~ 3 Iw 1 . , , 1 n C p .-. n Q e~ Z - G > A r o- ns- x~ 0 A Z'H ;aawq~e~;d .moo= . v ~ o . o s n . n ~ nV n Lv i . i . ~ x x x x x x . . . . . . ~ ~ N . N N U . O O O .ooo • i . __ 00 ~~ ~` ~x x ~~ N O O O 00 ~R ~ ~a J=~ O n - r~ a b ~~ P O ~ n n o '~S < n n ~n O~ dO O 7 a~ 0 -c P ~ L ~_ G r N 0 O ~__ goo i ~ ~ .~~ ~~_ ;~ . . n . '~: i . . . . • . . . ~xx ~xx . . . . . . x . x . i . . 1 1 N . o . O ;~ 4 . • 1 0 ~ - .D i n . ~ . . 0 n a r ___ a ~3~ •X X .+ N N O O O O O ^~ N ~ sooo M A OO •w o 0 -w a a~ • ~ M b ]D .o. .r ~ S 7 ~-+n gn~n n 1{ w ~ 7 ~w ~.~ ~~ ~~n~ ~..~ :~; g a '.~nc ~~ n ~~ nYl a ~ f.l n o, n o o < b 7 n N N tt C •+ -O.• -~ - 5~~ N b a-.~ n n cign ~ ~ A ~ M 0 0 n a ~ n n 6i p__a___ ~a~~~ ~ n < . ~x K -~ . ^ ~ m. ^ . n . . . . • . . . . . i }}tt xx x ~ 1t • X St • . i i x . . . 1 ~ N 1 N• 1 ?~. . • . i • ~ ' i . 1 ~ ~~ . O O . oo• . 0O ~ • . 1 • • 1 7~7•MN CZC . n N K N . U n . C O O ~ aO+ 7 7 a e ~~G b n . n .~ ~ ~ s ~n •~ ~O( w . A ~1 .D- r~i D A D -~ ~ N i ~. n~ o i .. ~ n S 1 a o ~ 0 < -~ ~ i 7-7-nn n ~ b n o -t n e o ~ O '7 ~ A P D n N 1 n ~ ~ i ~ . o o ~ ^ 1 7 A 'w i m ~ K i ~ -Oi ~~~ „_ . n ~ ~ ~ 1- O G A m x n n ~ ~ A ~.a n n rr ~ rrrrr ~ 7C 7[ s[•••x . A ~~~~ :g x~~ !~~ ~~ ;~ ~ wp ~s~8. a .tw n On K ' ~ A ~^ D f- O ^ M M l l O m ; ~ ~ 7 . 7 = ~ Cl . . O •~ -~ . ~ . ~ ~ fc~f . . n . .-. . ~ . . r . ~ . . . . t ~ . . i ~ . ~ i . . ~ i i . 7D . n ~ ~ .n i . x i ~ xxxxxx • ~ XX% xxxx x ~ %%x k x xx ~ %Yt r cxx fxx - ~ Q ~ .~ . j ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ j . ~ . ~ . . n . . ~ . ~ i . ~ . . . ~ . ~ . A ~ ~ A yy~~ x " _ ~ ~ ° % ~ x ~ ~ x ~ , ~ < . s . • i . n ~ fl i r . . A . . . .' ~ . . . . . . ~ m oo . . . b N I- ~ N ~ . n -- p fD ~ tn. ~ •. ~ 7O ^C . . . . K. • . ~ . •. . ~ O ^ ~ . . . o e . o ~ ~ i . . -C . i i . . M . m ~..~ . N .+N~ . N~ ~V1 . O ~ v+ o ~+ o ~ o o ~n v+ . o uw v+ o . ~ -~ $ ~ ~ S O . 0000 ~ o~ o00 ~ 00 oo ~ 5 e ~o ogo~ •0 000 .oo ~ 00 o . ~ ~~ • • • • • • 2 . S N x Z T . o v~0 . x N~ ~ ^~ i n p n i .~ - i S e+o ~ o~ y3 n A ~ A O ~ O 7 x x - ., 1 + n n ~ rf 1 ~ ~ b i O . N O . i - ~ o . o - m a p ~ m ~ ~ ~ = p x m o on ' P ' 1 R R J v n v . . ~ i ~ o n ~ x 1 n I nn a ~ ~ H ~ r , ~ ~ ~ .o i ~ o ~ ~ ~ i o ~ ~ ~ 1 i i . ~ ~ ~ i o ~ . n m A .-. b Z D - Q n Z 2>n N - -~- n > - n n £'H ~aauiq~e~~d I VI IA UI ~ n Iccc N '1 ~• O ^ M, 5- 1 ~ -~ o x ~~a ;. 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 x 1 x x x x I ~ x x x • 1 i 1 1 1 r ,' • 1 1 1 I ~. I N• ' i • 1 1 1 O O O O :' O O o C 1 000. 1 z N ;~ 1 ~ o a_ ~ O a n A n 0 N ~_ . y y y y :~ g~3S° 1 M 77b r1 ~~: ~: i O .~ o. ~ ' , 1 1 1 1 1 xxXXYt 1 1 , I I 1 1 ~ • 1 N .+ 1 OO~/I V1O ooo~+o 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 • • 1 ~ x -- 1 ^ a ~ x 1 A C 1 N A to to m ~ ~ u yaaa ~o °~R~ v I} ~ ~~ 7 i Q O ^~ , >r n za ~O ~~~~ ~ . ~` . ~: r N 00 00 00 n ~ N ld A O O O ~+'7 0O• o--~~ 00 07 • i pn • • v N n N ![3~ O C O n a, g~ u -. -o a, n a p O 0 0 3 u LL O i ~~ 8' < ~ v e n ~ 0 u o-< N 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 no b ~ .( N o -.. n o .. n . ? R a n oz .aaaaa .v vvvv p-+ s 1 C ~~~ o 1 ^ 1 b 1 -w 1 s 7 I -O7 1 a f1 1~ G 1~ n n n .. 1 i ~ ~ 1 CGlm7 ~~~ a ~' 1 • 1 1 . •( . 1 1 . 1 1 ,: 1: 1 . 1 . 1 1 1 : . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 / p 1 1 I ;~a~~~ ;~ ~x~x , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 , x 1 I • 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I u 1 1 s~ : Q u • rt 1 . . . . 1 1 • • 1 / 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 0 /~/ r I r 1 VI O NI 1 VI 1 O 1 ' 1 O I 1 I I , 1 1 ~ 1 1 • • 1 • • • 1 1 1 ~ ~ ; ~ u~ ~ ~ ~ q~ N 1 0 0 Stu 1 7 1 n 'n ~ ~~3 R~ 1 ^ ~ 1 1 1• 1 0 ~ 1 n M O ^ , ~ ~ 1 n a-t n , o , n 1 • ~ ~ , ~ ~ ^ -' o B n n 1 C n n ~ n 1-~ -~ yL '4 1 0 ' '- A , ~ 1 e -~ 1 yl 1 n10 ~ O 10 a~~ .. 1 -. • 1 ~ o m ^- d 1 0 ~ .... a .( A n x . n ~ 7c~< ~ n 1 , ^ 7 N ' < LL 1 n n ~ ~ o ~ 4 N , 1 !~ ` J 1 • ; 1 ~ • 1 a o 1 2 $ ~ ~ 1 o n , a m ~ x ~ Q. m 1 ~ o ~ , v .. ^ ,0 1 1 "•, 1 ~. 1 0 .. - , 1 K 7 .r 1 n ~y 1 ~ a 1 0 1 n _ 1 1 i '7 O 1 m a~ ~ 1 ~ - , . 1 ^ 1 ~a ~, 1 , 1 1 .. 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , i 1 1 v vvvv o ~-•ns ~ .•- n n .. .~ n ~ s~al;• ~<g" ~ ~m o. 0 ~~~~ A x K x• x ~ N 00 00 00 r~ ~ N n n ~ -~ +O O •7 O O j ~0 0 • • ~ -. a A ^ ~. 7 ~~ .. ~~ ~ M j N 0 o• 0 00 0 ~~ ~' a p o -C -~ o'~ go n ~n M N n aO A o~ o o ~a 0 .. -Z 0 0 0 . n ~g ;~ 1 \ ~n 1 1.~ :~ 1 1 a 1 A I ~. . ~ 1 1 1 ~n A 1 y 1 ~ 1 ~ r 1 +• i 1 n n In 1 O 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 m a 1 O y 1~ 1 n re qC ISo 1 ~s 1 0 ~ s Is ~ ~~ .m 1 a _ 1 n ^ 170 ~ a o n 1 O •+ I '•( i ~m 1 x 1~ • 2 O N 0. ~1 1 0 1 1 n ~•a-+ a 2 e . Q a=- In - ~ O - fl ) - >r . n n b'H ~uawq~~;d iZ ~~ ~~ ~ n • .. 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / xx 1 xx i i / r r 1 . . i 1 1 1 I 1 . . I N N 1 O O . . • 0 0 1 00 i ~ 1 1 1 ~ • 1 n^n NN 1 O NN 1 ~~ _.~ Vlo I f0 •N o 0 --c v •+ 0 0 1 s o ~ w b n •f n 1 ~~ yo 1,1~ 1 r•( 07a 1 3 ~ d ;~ - S.•lo ~7 n ~ o~~•~~~ 1 •'1 •'~ 7 1 n ~ 1 ., o 1 0 0 ~ - o +n7~_ 1 '1 N ••• 1 n N• C 70 • n r -7 O 1 - = o 1 ~ ~ c ~ o a 1 » n L o 1 a^ n o K 7G •"/ N 1 STS[ Q N O 7 O ~ n ? ~ i ~ n -. O _ 1 ~ ~ ^V ••• n o ~ - i -an.+~ n D D ~ ~n o~ - ~•• N 'l r.`C7o- -. n to ., 7 0 0 -•~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ N m 7 1 - n• 7 O '< 1 -w P 1 ? ~>O 1 n m v • ono 1 ~ -, 1 .. < ~ r ~ -• a o n o -. n .~ i n 1 ~=^~n 1 C - n n 1 1 n ~ n a ~ n -- < i 7 ~ 1 n 1 ~1 -~ w -• nos? i -i n t0 1 ~ 1 i n N 0 ~_ ~_ n L N 1 n C 7~ O 7 O n L 0 V O a s N 7 v 1---n n I s s o -•o 1 a~~ ~N N • ~ a ~ -1 w 1 n n ~ •+ ~~o n 7 ~ ~n L n e D v w?>> w 9 , 0 • S • w ~ 1 s n g 1 ~ -i s 1 0 ~ m• -~ 7 . 1 n m a ; ~ ~~ 1 7• I 1 1 I 1 t • • • • 1 1 ' 1 • 1 1 1 Z 1 1 1 1 '~ 1 I x n x x x I x x x x x Ixwxxx Ixxxxx 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 • x ~ x x x x 1 x x x 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r i 1 1 ~ I 1 N NW-+ 1 ~+N~NN 1 N OOO 1 OVI ~-+~ 1 .0 000 looooo •0 000 looooo • . 1 • 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ • • ~ • 1 1 I z z 1 s 1 O O o 1 x H n ~ 1 p x 1 ~, n 1 ~ .Q n 1 ~ 1 O Q N O a •o • o 0 0_ 0 ~ ~v+ G < o ~+ -c N 1 I ~~ :~ In ~ ~ppp i i 1 1 1 1 A 1 n I 1 •~ ~ ~ 1 n 1 n 1 N 7 In 3 1 < y'. • ~ o 0 ~n n In - O 1 1 1 ~ m ~o 1 p N n 1 n •+• o to I~o~c ~o•- ~o ~o • O `C 'i ..~ O _ ~ n T ~ 0 ••• 0 •nC ~ m 1 ~ o m O 7 ~ a -. e 2 0 Q nz- arn N -~- ~r- >: ~ A n S-H ~aawq~e~~d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFOL LINTY ~MINISTRATIONOCENTER~~ VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE C MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has b et fortFY1993-94. udget work session. On May 11, 1993, the Board will be asked to adopt the budg ~~ . Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Eddy - - Denied () Johnson - Received () Kohinke - Referred () Minnix - To ~) Nickens - - - ..~- / AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 3 THROIIGH MAY 15, 1993 AS VIRGINIA HERITAGE TOIIRISM WEEKS WHEREAS, Historic Preservation helps provide a deeper understanding of the diversity of our uniquely American heritage; and WHEREAS, Historic Preservation enhances the livability of communities across America, from large metropolitan cities to small, rural farming towns; and WHEREAS, Preservation Week 1993 and the first annual Virginia Heritage Tourism Weeks provide opportunity for citizens of all ages and walks of life to make the connection between historic preservation and the aesthetic, environmental and economic well- being of their communities; and WHEREAS, "Preservation and Livable Communities: Make the Connection!" is the theme for Preservation Week 1993, co-sponsored by the Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation, Roanoke Regional Preservation Office, other local preservation organizations in the Roanoke Valley, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim May 3 through May 15, 1993, as VIRGINIA HERITAGE TOIIRISM WEEKS in Roanoke County, and call upon our citizens to recognize and participate in this special obser- vance. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 42793-1 OF APPRECIATION TO SIISAN BLEVINS, KAREN BHELTON, PAT SALES, AND COALITION FOR ACCESSIBLE PARR PLAYGROIIND FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN CREATING THE FREEDOM PLAYGROIIND AT PENN FOREST WHEREAS, increased awareness of meeting the needs of people with disabilities has resulted in the Americans with Disabilities Act; and WHEREAS, all children, regardless of abilities, need the opportunity to play and pretend with their peers; and WHEREAS, two Roanoke County residents, Susan Blevins and Karen Shelton, in their desire to see an upgrade at the Penn Forest Playground, became equally committed to the creation of a play area for all children; and WHEREAS, these two citizens, along with Pat Sales, Principal of Penn Forest Elementary School, and the Coalition for Accessible Park Playground (CAPP), were able to create the second totally accessible playground in the nation, with construction taking place almost entirely through donations and volunteer efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the children of Roanoke County, do hereby extend sincere congratulations and appreciation to SIISAN BLEVINS, KAREN SHELTON, PAT SALES, AND COALITION FOR ACCESSIBLE PARR PLAYGROIIND for their efforts at creating the Freedom Playground at Penn Forest and for their dedication, thoughtfulness and compassion for children of all strengths and abilities. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Director, Parks & Recreation Department {~ .. ~~~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION OF APPRECIATION TO SUSAN BLEVINS, KAREN SHELTON, PAT SAYLES, AND COALITION FOR ACCESSIBLE PARR PLAYGROUND FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN CREATING THE FREEDOM PLAYGROUND AT PENN FOREST WHEREAS, increased awareness of meeting the needs of people with disabilities has resulted in the Americans with Disabilities Act; and WHEREAS, all children, regardless of abilities, need the opportunity to play and pretend with their peers; and WHEREAS, two Roanoke County residents, Susan Blevins and Karen Shelton, in their desire to see an upgrade at the Penn Forest Playground, became equally committed to the creation of a play area for all children; and WHEREAS, these two citizens, along with Pat Sayles, Principal of Penn Forest Elementary School, and the Coalition for Accessible Park Playground (CAPP), were able to create the second totally accessible playground in the nation, with construction taking place almost entirely through donations and volunteer efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the children of Roanoke County, do hereby extend sincere congratulations and appreciation to SUSAN BLEVINS, KAREN SHELTON, PAT SAYLES, AND COALITION FOR ACCESSIBLE PARR PLAYGROUND for their efforts at creating the Freedom Playground at Penn Forest and for their dedication, thoughtfulness and compassion for children of all strengths and abilities. N. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RE80LUTION 42793-2 OF SUPPORT FOR THE ROANORE AREA JOB OPPORTUNITIES CONVENTION ON APRIL 28, 1993 WHEREAS, the third annual Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention will be held April 28, 1993, at the Roanoke Civic Center Exhibition Hall; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities is jointly sponsored by the Roanoke County Schools, Botetourt County Schools, Craig County Schools, Roanoke City Schools, and Salem City Schools; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention is to provide an opportunity for business, industry, and government representatives to interview 1993 graduating seniors with marketable skills and a desire for full- time employment; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke county 5cnool rsoara r~~iievc5 ~~~a~ such an event will be a learning experience to those students seeking full-time employment after graduation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do support the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention to be held on April 28, 1993, as being in the best interest of Roanoke County and the surrounding areas. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a successful event to all participants. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, d and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy, NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~`~^" Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools ~- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE ROANORE AREA JOB OPPORTUNITIES CONVENTION ON APRIL 28, 1993 WHEREAS, the third annual Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention will be held April 28, 1993, at the Roanoke Civic Center Exhibition Hall; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities is jointly sponsored by the Roanoke County Schools, Botetourt County Schools, Craig County Schools, Roanoke City Schools, and Salem City Schools; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention is to provide an opportunity for business, industry, and government representatives to interview 1993 graduating seniors with marketable skills and a desire for full- time employment; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board believes that such an event will be a learning experience to those students seeking full-time employment after graduation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do support the Roanoke Area Job Opportunities Convention to be held on April 28, 1993, as being in the best interest of Roanoke County and the surrounding areas. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a successful event to all participants. Item No . E' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on Explore Park Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: ~~~ ~?~ ~ ~ ~~~ /~-+, ~~~ ~;~~ ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rupert Cutler and Stan Lanford, member of the Board of Directors for The River Foundation, will make a brief presentation concerning the funding status of the Explore Park. Margaret Moles, Principal of Oak Grove Elementary School, will discuss the educational benefits of the project. Pam Cooke-Mitchell, Chairperson of the Explore Advisory Committee, will reaffirm the support of the committee for the Explore Park project. Respectfully submitted: Timothy W. Gu ala, Director Department of Economic Development ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ~.. Update on Explore Park For the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors By M. Rupert Cutler, Director of Education Virginia's Explore Park April 27, 1993 Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board of Supervisors: I appreciate this opportunity to update you on the status of the Explore Project at this time, just prior to-- • your consideration of the 1993-1994 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program, which includes $350,000 (matched by the state) for the improvement of Rutrough Road from the landfill entrance to a point beyond the Explore Park entrance, and • your session this evening devoted to hearing public comments on the county's proposed budget for Fiscal Year 1993-1994, which includes a $100,000 grant for the operation and construction of Explore Park. With the help of three others--retired 6th District Congressman Jim Olin, River Foundation board member Stan Lanford, and Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority board member Peggy Moles--I'll do my best to make clear how important Explore Park is to Roanoke County and how well we've done so far in making it happen. Then it will be up to you, who administer our home county, to determine our future rate of progress. Before I summarize the status of the work on the ground at the park, I'd like to make six brief points with regard to the Explore-related line items in the road and general fund budgets. First, any new business routinely reinvests its profits for a few years to make it grow to substantial size. The same is true of Explore Park. It will be wise to plow back some of your motel room tax receipts into Explore Park, to help build the park's attractions. We have been and will be good stewards of the monies made available to Explore to date. Public monies have been invested in tangible assets, and the project has no debt. And, as the park's reputation grows and more people come, your county tax receipts--not just from the lodging tax but from county taxes on craft and food sales and admissions-will grow ...and be available for other county projects. I hope the county's taxpaying residents understand that you are not proposing to use the taxes they pay on real estate or personal property at Explore. As I understand Mr. Hodge's proposal, only those taxes paid by visitors to the county-- nonresidents--would be invested at Explore, to attract more travelers, who will spend their money at retail establishments in Roanoke County and grow the local economy. Second, there has been no change in the original thrust of the project, which is to celebrate our pioneer ancestors. The original master plan is still our master plan. It has been modified only at the margin, to respond to local concerns about potential overdevelopment of the site and a lack of historical authenticity. Our responses have included moving the parkway spur away from the Roanoke River wildlife habitat corridor, designating 1,000 acres of scientific natural areas, saving the wooded ravine near the Blue Ridge Settlement as a natural aviary "biopark" rather than bulldozing the adjacent ridge into it to expand the footprint of the town, and redesigning the frontier town to replicate an 1830s Blue Ridge settlement as authentically as possible. Page 2 But we have not made any changes in the plan to build a 500-acre zoo and a unique Native American Park featuring Eastern Woodland Cultures at Explore in addition to a frontier town which, by itself, will have potentially the drawing power of Old Sturbridge Village, Shakertown, or Greenfield Village. And Greenfield Village in Michigan and Stone Mountain Park in Georgia--the same size as Explore Park-- each draw 6 1/2 million visitors a year. Third, the teaching element involved in Explore is a first-class program being directed by a highly qualified and experienced former Teacher of the Year from Franklin County, Ginny Webb. We're proud of the fact that we are uniquely integrating cultural heritage and environmental conservation themes in our hands-on learning opportunity at Explore Park. Some 7,000 children, mainly fourth graders, will have enjoyed the Explore Park field trip by the end of May. Peggy Moles, the principal of Oak Grove Elementary School, will give you her expert assessment of the quality of the educational staff, program and opportunity at Explore Park shortly. Fourth, the payback to Roanoke County will be substantial. Here are our best estimates of jobs on site, attendance, and county sales and admission tax revenue to be created by Explore Park: I'll give you figures for two different years, for 1994- 1995, the first year we'll be open, and for the year 2000--just six years later. In the first year of operation eve estimate we'll employ between 20 and 25 people at the park; attract 50,000 visitors; and generate $10,000 in county sales tax receipts. But six years later we estimate park employment at between 100 and 125; attendance at 490,000; and direct payback of tax receipts to the county of $177,500. That does not Page 3 include any so-called "multiplier effects" ...but the potential for positive local economic impacts through the sale of homes and other necessities of life to Explore employees (including well-paid veterinary doctors, teachers, interpreters and administrators) as well as through the purchases in nearby retail establishments by hundreds of thousands of visitors is obvious. The payback will be substantial. Fifth, the brief history of the Explore Project is replete with successes. Thanks to the Explore initiative, over 1,300 acres of beautiful Roanoke River gorge is now public property forever. I~ will be accessed by a Blue Ridge Parkway-standard parkway spur road. Two dozen historic Roanoke Valley buildings have been saved and will be reassembled to perpetuate an important architectural heritage. Three and a half million dollars have been raised from the private sector to initiate this program and 28 million dollars of public funds have provided the land, the access and the plan. It is poised for liftoff. And we have literally dozens of partner organizations throughout western Virginia, from the 4-H, YWCA and Scout programs to zoological, history, science, theatre and symphony associations to major colleges and universities, ready, willing and anxious to do their public-service "thing" at Explore Park. The partnership-program ball is rolling. But, point six" we need your help with both the Rutrough Road improvement project, to be able to open the park in 1994, and with a grant for partial support of our operating budget in the 1993-94 fiscal year, to be able to concentrate on development of the park and on General Assembly action to make Explore Park a state agency by July 1, 1994. Evidence of strong home county support will be needed Page 4 to convince state legislators of the importance of Explore as a state-level priority protect. The precedent has been set for the administration of projects such as Explore Park as a state agency. One need only refer, for example, to the annual report of the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation, which runs the Jamestown Settlement and the Yorktown Victory Center, to see how comparable our program is to theirs. They receive three and a half million dollars in state funds each year to supplement two million dollars in revenue from admission fees and one million dollars in gifts to their private educational trust--just the sort of balance we would like to strike at Explore Park. Now I'll update you on the park's status, quickly, by reporting that-- • the historic farmstead in the Blue Ridge Settlement has come to life with the arrival of the first farm animals there--two little pigs!--and the planting of the first antique variety of apple tree (a golden russet) in the farm orchard (completed structures there include the 1837 Hofauger I-Iouse, the 1850 Wray Barn, and two corn cribs); • the nature trail network and associated educational displays now include atwo-mile trail built by volunteers from the Society of American Foresters (with Boy Scout help) and a planting of blight-resistant chestnut trees given by the American Chestnut Foundation; • the American Center for Rare and Endangered Species (ACRES) has a breeding pair of endangered red wolves, thanks to funds from several private Page 5 corporations, and a new master plan design, thanks to a gift from the Appalachian Power Company; and • as we speak, private foundations and corporations have grant proposal to build additional structures in the Blue Ridge Settlement under active consideration. Now I'd like to yield the floor to former Congressmen Jim Olin, who helped make Explore Park possible through his unfailing support of the project in the United States Congress. Page 6 ~Uiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ - - = _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ _ ' APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c - SUBJECT: ~ X ~ Lo t'~ E .~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ q I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c -_ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - - ~_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -_ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ - '- _ - - - _ _ - - - - - NAME .Df~ v 6 ~ .~', ~~ ~ R~..j° - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS ~ ~~~ % S ~-~ !`~ ~ . ~.. ~ , ~, , _ - - - - - - -_ - - - - PHONE ~ ;~ `~` ~~ - - _ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~"~ ~Illllllllllllillllllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllillllil~lllllllillillllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _~ _= APPE CE RE VEST ~~ Q - _ -_ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ... ~ ~ ~ -. SUBJECT: ~" ~ ~t.~..~- ~'..:,.~.a~ r~-s-rv,~,~~ r = = ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _ __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - _ fi 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~{ f~7 ~~~ s-- ~ .. ~. ~. __ ~,,,,,~._ ~ /~°- ,.x,.52.7 ~,,. ~,~„,..:,r~.~,~.'. ,~ ~u;r~.r~.,. _. ` ~,~-- ,,. .. (} ~ ~ (~ ,~ i e \ .pr~q,q_ o.1y ~ ..avtilr. ,:+rt..._. C .tea--J^~-- ~. ~+/~-~'/`~-- G~-,~R..._ a-n.:. ~-.,6u.a~v,.,.,~_ ,:~~sta,~.ti~.d.,wt..,..~. a,~.-/ o,.~.R.s1~ -, %r~a-' ~:~Ra-..sue.. ~~.~..-,,~.~ _ ~.~.~.~t. ~ .».~= ..o.~--i '~;,,~ ~ a.,.~~.,.. ~~~,~~ . f ~ ,~ e ... .-~ ~a...r.'s~-a :cx.~-oQ-- ~~~ r ~ -- rte-0:.''~~R!~~/'' C-4.~''~-_„....,`''"°'/l.- ,~,,.''n --- - ~~~ .A- ~~ _. rf _ ACTION # A-42793-3 ITEM NUMBER 1~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Projects for 1993-94 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~.~ ~~~~ BACRGROIIND The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive state matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvements to primary and secondary roads in the state's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides $10,000,000 for the matching program and limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or less than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. Staff has included one project requested by a citizen. The property owner has agreed to pay either half or over half of the cost to make this improvement. Priority number two is the project under consideration. SIIMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff and representatives of VDOT have prepared a priority list of proposed projects to be constructed with revenue sharing funds. The proposed priority list (four projects) represents approximately 1 million dollars of construction cost. If additional Revenue Sharing Funds become available during fiscal year 1993-94, staff will submit an additional list of projects. ~'-1 Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the priority list in order that we may notify the Virginia Department of Transportation of our intentions to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program. The construction and funding for Rutrough Road was approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 26, 1993. The Board of Supervisors has the option to amend the list of Revenue Sharing Projects later into the fiscal year 1993-94. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative Number 1: Approve the projects list, and defer appropriation of the remaining funds ($75,000 to $150,000) at this time. Alternative Number 2: Decline to participate in revenue sharing for fiscal year 1993-94. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative Number 1. B TTED BY: APPROVED BY: .-~. / ~s.,~ ~ d Covey Direct r Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Ins ections_________________County Administrator -------------------- ------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harrv C. Nickens No Yes Abstain Denied ( ) motion to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson ~ Ref erred Kohinke x To Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~r a o e > N r5 z w w z z z z 9 m F C` W P q q O ~ o >>>> O w S Z O U V Q W d' J d Z r OC N W W z x r v ^ u v O ~' N W Ci Z W ~ N ~ J ~ O ~ N ~ r ~ J K a' W U d ~ > ~ ~ Q' N 5 U W Z J O W Q O_ Q 6 ~ 3 = u 7 L .. j 1 - F- J ~ o00 Q In N ~ H ~_ ~ W o O o ~ N n K 2 O d G c ° ° °o c a W ~ ~~`o~ Z U ~ ~p ~-~ p W ~ ~ ~ ~~ o N ^ N Q 0 W SJ .1 b O J ~"' N_ P ~ N ~ ~ U U Q S ~°,v W~ZN Q Wh= £.Q Sm 2r pF-°I'.~.FW- ..~op~d~ooc Wm NP W~ZN O a S~ W< ~p Sm W oW Zf Tr.. FW.. a~"R'OdK OK Q K q o K Z 2 ~ ~ O l' ~ W W ~ Q ~ Z W O ~ K Y Y I~r W m m ~ N j ~ N 0 a s rs F- ~ ~ a ~u ~ ^a ..S K a ' My ~r _T~ i,a~ '~i~? ~5 ~ }N'e'h.9006 // >oa pla ~ i.z / ~~z ~w >W / / ~~ ~~ w~ ti'~ ~ e. ~ .~~C. Qo iii / /' ~ ..~ ~. jd'~. ao // ee z ~,` ~\ i~ ,' .'.~ I ~~ ~ ..•;, ~In~`:~i;~':~ I I i A ~~ ~~ ;! i9 t = ~ ;~• ~; ~__~ 1~= E 5 :. ~ ~ I/ ~ _ ' \ \ i ~ ' lL \` ~ ' ~\\ I 1iI ~ '~~ ~\, ,1 `~ . ~' } + ~~ ~ ~ ' . A~ ~~ A~~ ea" ~\ ~ ~. /~ ~~ k r~ ~~~. /. it ~ ~a / yi / / „~ afa..,~ sai,, __ \J•+., 1 ~~J/ ~~ EP/ore Par.h~ w~ w.anc u,a~ '"~ sas ~-- ,~ ~ ~~ ~ I~ ~~1 ~ ~ IS~1 \~ nee v 1/f~ J ,,_ . y . v> '_ „ ~ ~ x .., ~.,. ~ / / 2Y ~:: J .2 ~~ .~.: _ _. _ ROANOKE couNTY WIDEN ROAD, PULL DITCHES ~ P M ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 1 -8% 9.82 Ac /~ ~ / ° ~a y0y ~°° 5 6~'d 2 ~ ' 2.66AC ~ ,, 05 /~ 6 4pj° / 2.00 Ac / yp06 ~ .d~ /S • / f 6 s ~~ ` 9 ~ if~~~' ~s e A9;1 ` ~ 13.57Ac 12 10 I.IOAc \ 39Ac(D) II 21Ac IC) .$ ` 1.06 Ac ~ M 13 ~ n ~p0 ~ 14 ~ ~p° ~, ~33g 'Ry a O ~,5~p, ~ I ~,o~° 26 ~ `4p5 ~ 13 5 25 ~ ~ 12 r~?9 2.23Ac(C1 . _. ' i'3~ Gaud Sns~e~d .' CAvcA 3.88Ac _ ROANOKE couNTY INSTALL SIGNALIZATION E~ TURN LANES ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 2 ROANOKE COUNTY UPGRADE CULVERT TD 2 <ea) 6X4 BDXES ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ~ 3 '. JI ~~~ aee4~a y r' ~~~ „oa,- ~ o. ,,\ ''~i 1 , - .,,, y. L I \ ~, ~ O 1 ~ ~ ~\ ~\ us ~ i .. ~'~ y/ ~~ ~` a~` / // ~ i ~'~ l~ ~ ~_-~ is \I z•s.~u i ~. i r,.. ~ 1~'i ee..r 5'. -\ / s.v e ~\ ~ N~ 9 r/ ~~\ /~`\~ 1 /, :, ~ /~ ssi ~ • / ~ "' ~i ~ ,i ~ ~ ~ Y -~`; ~ ~~_ 5 \ ~ m P Y C + •9~ ~` ~~ !i ~ 9tlp 69 \ ~~ ~ - ~ / ~ r- ~-~ / -/ / ,1 fr-, . ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT UPGRADE 18' RCP TD 2Cen) 78' RCP 4 0~ ~ AN ~ ...E ~ ; , I ~...- F . A z ~ _~ a ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~.~.~ 38 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR April 20, 1993 BOARDOFSUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN (703) 772-2004 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT County Primary and Secondary EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. Road Fund Revenue Sharin Pro Y'am \~AMAGISTERIAL DISTRICT g g / HARRY C. NICKENS Code of Virginia, VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Section 33.1-75. 1 Fiscal Year 1993-9403) 772-200s County of Roanoke Mr. James S. Givens Acting State Secondary Roads Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Givens: The County of Roanoke, Virginia, indicates by this letter its official intent to participate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Year 1993-94. The County will provide $500,000.00 ($500,000.00 maximum) for this program, to be matched on a dollar- for dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia. The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible items of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program will be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. Having requested the maximum of $500,000 in state funds, the County further requests that an additional amount of $125,000 be made available in the event that any funds remain unallocated after initial allocations are made. Sincerely, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman, Board of Supervisors dj pc: Jeffrey Echols, Resident Engineer Attachment: Priority Listing of Projects ® aecyded Paper ~' ~, AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 42793-4 APPROVING THE ROANORE VALLEY RESOIIRCE AIIT8ORITY BIIDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDING JIINE 30, 1994, IIPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement provides that the Authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 19, 1993, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted a request that the County approve the budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the year ending June 30, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the budget for the year ending June 30, 1994 for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the March 19, 1993, report of the Authority Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ,~ . Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Gardner W. Smith, Chairman, RVRA John R. Hubbard, Executive Director, RVRA John Parrott, Chairman, Landfill Board Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ 'o~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve 1993-1994 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~,,~,~,~~ ~.,,/ .~~ d~ BACKGROUND: On March 18, 1993, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority adopted an operating budget for the year ending June 30, 1994. As specified in the Roanoke Valley Members Use Agreement, this budget must now be approved by the charter member users before it can be placed in effect. SUMMARY: On March 18, 1993, the Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority submitted the attached approved budget for consideration by the charter member users. The budget totals $7,611,800. This budget is based on the anticipated startup date of October 1, 1993 and projects tipping fees of $50 per ton for municipal waste and $55 for private waste. The final rates will be set following public hearings which will be held by the Resource Authority prior to the opening of the new facility. The budget also includes a 3 percent salary increase for the Resource Authority employees. FISCAL IMPACT: The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority budget will impact the County in two ways: (1) Tipping fees will increase in 1993-94. The municipal rate is set at $50 per ton, however, charter members will receive a $20 per ton credit that will allow the members ~~ to maintain a $30 per ton rate throughout 1993-94. This is still an increase over the current tipping rate of $20 per ton. (2) The County will receive a host locality fee from the Resource Authority to compensate for the siting of the landfill within the County. This host locality fee is $300,000 on an annual basis which computes to $225,000 for this partial beginning year. Both of the above fiscal impacts are included in the 1993-94 proposed County budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the operating budget of the Roanoke, valley Resource Authority for the year ended June 30, 1994. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, ,~./ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1994, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement provides that the Authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 19, 1993, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted a request that the County approve the budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the year ending June 30, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the budget for the year ending June 30, 1994 for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the March 19, 1993, report of the Authority Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 3433 Brambleton Avenue, SW ~i p~ Roanoke, Virginia 24018 (703) 772-2130 March 19, 1993 Mr. Robert Herbert, City Manager City of Roanoke 215 Church Ave. Roanoke, Va. 24011 Dear Mr. Herbert, On March 18, 1993, the RVRA approved its 1993-94 annual operating budget. The budget totals $7,611,800 and is funded through projected tipping fees and funds from the Roanoke Valley Solid Waste Management Board. The projected tipping fees for municipal waste will be $50/ton and $55/ton for private waste. The final rates will be set after a public hearing held by the Resource Authority prior to the opening of the new facilities. All charter members will receive a $20/ton credit against the proposed rate that will allow the members to maintain a $30/ton rate throughout the 1993-94 fiscal year. This credit will be funded through the use of surplus funds available from the current landfill operation. Attached is a summary of the budget including the Executive Director's report, a comparison with the bond projections and a notice sent to all the major private haulers and their customers. If additional information is needed the budget details are available. In accordance with the Member Use agreement, this annual budget is being submitted for approval by the Roanoke City Council. The Resource Authority looks forward to serving the City with this new state-of-the- art facility for many years to come. Respectfully, Gardner W. Smith, Chairman GWS/pld cc: Mr. John R Hubbard, Executive Director Mr. John H. Parrott, Chairman, Landfill Board RVRA Board Members Disposal Fees $ 7.511 Interest Income S -4 Reimbursement from Landfill Board $ 100,000 Total: $ 7.611,800 Eacpenses Personnel: Operating: Capital: Transfer to Reserves Debt Service $ 936 ,320 $ 2. 832, 680 S 24. 800 $ 2, 015,000 $ 1, 803.000 Total: $ 7.611,800 ~ Disposal Fees Municipal Private $~0 per ton S 5~ per ton F~ .e . .. - - .. . V g3 BUDGE'T~ C~,}MPARIS(~N R ~~ ~ A CATEGORY BOND F.Y.93/94 ACTUAL PROJECTION BUDGET WASTE GENERATION (Tons) Solid Waste Generated Residential Waste 61,400 59,640 Commercial Waste 81,400 82,360 Less: Additional Source Recycling Residential Waste (3,900) (0) Commercial Waste (5.100) (O) Solid Waste to the System 133,800 142,000 OPERATING REVENUES Tipping Fee Revenue Requirement S 7,379,000.00 S 7,511,800 Interest Income 101,000.00 -0- Reimbursement: RVSWMB -0- 100.000 Total Operating Revenues S 7,480,000.00 S 7,611,800 OPERATING EXPENSES Landfill & Tractsfer Station S 2,140,000.00 S 2,096,500 Rail Expenses 1.222.000.00 1.372.500 Total Operating Expenses S 3,362,000.00 S 3,469,000 NET REVENUES AVAII.ABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE S 4,118,000.00 S 4,142,800 DEBT SERVICE S 1,803,000.00 S 1,803,000 DEPOSITS TO RESERVE ACCOUNTS Closure Fund S 375,000.00 S 375,000 Renewal & Replacements Fund Equipment Reserves S 525,000.00 S 525,000 Environmental Fund & Contingencies 98,000.00 98,000 Host Community Improvement 8,000.00 8,000 Property Value Protection 150.000.00 150.000 Total Deposits to R&R Fund S 781,000.00 S 781,000 HOST FEES S 300,000.00 S 300,000 EXCESS REVENUES S 859,000.00 S 883,800 INDENTURE COVERAGE TEST (.10 S .48 .49 MIN.) ADDITIONAL DEPOSITS TO RESERVES Further Site Development S 690,000.00 S 690,000 Interim & Post Development 19,000,00 19,000 Recycling 150.000.00 150.000 Total Additional Deposits to Reserves S 859,000.00 S 859,000 SOLID WASTE TIPPING FEES/($/TON) Residential (Municipal) Commercial S 52.30 S 50.00 S 57.30 S 55.00 ~a MEETING: SUBJECT: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: March 18, 1993 Budget: 1993-94 Approval and Submittal to Charter Members Annually, by April 1, the Resource Authority must develop, approve and submit to the Charter Members an operating budget. This fiscal year's budget will initiate the operation of the new waste disposal facilities, as the existing facilities are being closed. Waste disposal fees will obviously increase drastically due to the cost of constructing and operating new facilities under the new federal and state regulations. These costs have been a major concern for the Resource Authority, local governments and businesses. The Budget Committee has prepared the proposed budget to maintain costs within those previously projected and within projections prepared for bond sales. Page 14 of the budget compares the proposed budget with bond projections. The budget also maintains the importance and significance that recycling plays in the Valley's efforts to address the waste problems, through the funding of several recycling programs, totalling $420,000. A budget summary has been formulated and is found on page 1, indicating a total budget of $7,611,800, with approximately 5096 allocated for reserves and debt service. As indicated, the projected disposal fees are $50/ton for residential and $55/ton for commercial wastes, both of which are 10% less than originally projected. Final rates and charges will be set by the Resource Authority through a public hearing process prior to October. With rising costs anticipated, efforts have been made to inform the local governments and commercial customers through meetings and information notices, as shown on the attachment sent to the customers of the major commercial haulers and the news media. Continued efforts to maintain costs and inform our customers will be a major priority of the Resource Authority throughout its operation. RECOMMENDATION: It is my pleasure, acting on behalf of the Budget Committee, to recommend the approval of the 1993-94 budget as submitted, and to recommend authorization for the chairman to submit the budget summary and bond comparison for the Charter Members' approval. Respectfully submitted: ~~ john R. ubbard, P. . Chief Executive Officer ~- r~ AT A MEETING OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY HELD AT THE BRAMBLETON CORPORATE CENTER ON THURSDAY, MARCH 18,' 1993 RESOLUTION No. ~A93-45 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AUTHORITY'S ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF SUCH BUDGET TO THE GOVERNING BODIES OF THE CHARTER MEMBER USERS FOR APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY MEMBERS USE AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority that: 1. The fiscal year 1993-94 annual budget for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, r. ~ as set forth in the report and accompanying attachments by the Chief Executive Officer, dated March 18, 1993, is hereby approved; 2. The Authority Chairman is authorized on behalf of the Authority to submit the fiscal year 1993-94 annual budget to the governing bodies of the Charter Member Users, being the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton, for approval in accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement, dated October 23, 1991, as amended. ATTEST: ~~lL ~ ~'I Carolyn B. Wagner, RVRA d Secretary Mr. Kiser made a motion to approve resolution RA93-45, to approve the 1993-94 annual budget and authorize its submittal to the Charter Member Users for approval, seconded by Ms. Schefsky, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Kiser, Mr. Benninger, Ms. Schefksy, Mr. Smith NAYS: None ABSENT: Ms. Hyatt, Ms. Wimmer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority New Waste Disposal Fees f Psr Ton 70 eo 60 ~ RISING COSTS!!! ,a so- lo ,o 0 tees roes rase rase 2000 2002 Year The Roanoke Valley Resource Authority wants you to be informed not surprised! Costs for waste disposal will be rising, we want you to be aware of the increases now, to provide time for planning and budgeting. Effective October, 1993, commercial waste disposal rates will increase to approximately $60 per ton. As a Valley business, this will affect the amount you pay for trash removal services, either directly to a hauler or through your rental or lease agreement. Why are costs rising? For years we have been "wasting away". We've wasted so much, we've filled a landfill. Now our environment demands we become aware of what we throw away and where we throw it. In October, 1993, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, a joint effort of Roanoke Valley governments, will be opening a new environmentally sound landfill that will meet strict federal and state regulations. The facility, known as Smith Gap Landfill, is located on Bradshaw Road in Roanoke County. New innovative environmental techniques are being used in the construction at Smith Gap to protect the surrounding area. The new landfill has a life expectancy of 70 to 80 years, and will be constructed to meet rigid environmental protection regulations, which include liners, leachate collection and groundwater monitoring wells. The construction will also pay strict attention to the adjoining neighborhood to see that the site is screened from view, so the landfill will be a "good neighbor". These measures are expensive, but important, and will last long into the future. How will waste disposal change? Trash will be transported in the manner that is normal for your business, and then the changes will begin! After the waste is delivered to the transfer station, located on Hollins Road, it will be inspected for elimination of hazardous waste and transferred to rail cars. The railcars, sealed airtight with locked tops, will carry the trash to the tipper station at the landfill. At this point, the material will be transferred to large hauling vehicles, taken to the landfill area and buried. What can you do? Plan and budget for the future now. Plan ahead by putting more into savings plans to be used later for increased costs. Reduce trash by recycling. We plan to have educational programs available in the near future detailing methods of waste reduction. Call the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority if you have questions - 772-2130. Our environment is important. Roanoke Valley governments realize this and are working together through the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority to develop a safe and efficient waste disposal system. Yes, costs will increase, but these costs will be an investment in the environmental future of the Roanoke Valley. ~ . pnntcd on recycled ~a~er ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-42793-5 f •~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Proposal to retain fees collected from several small jail operations accounts COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S C,O~M'MENTS: BACKGROUND• The Sheriff's Office is capable of collecting fees for operations of the Jail. There are several small accounts that are revenue generating. This money is earmarked by the General Assembly, and its use is limited. In most cases, it has to be used for inmate programs. After conferring with the County Attorney's Office and the Treasurer of Roanoke County, I am requesting that these revenues be deposited into a designated Sheriff's subfund of the General Fund to be expended without requiring additional action by the Board of Supervisors. Per the suggestion of the Auditor of Public Accounts of Virginia and the Attorney General's unofficial opinion, these funds should be allocated to the Sheriff by the Board of Supervisors for expending, as opposed to past practices where these funds have been under the complete control of the Sheriff . It is my desire to have an official record with County Government of the amount collected and expended within the designated subfund. The revenue generating sources are forfeited drug asset seizures, inmates' canteen and telephone system account, fingerprinting of citizens for employment purposes, Work Release Program, criminal history checks for employers, and weekender fees. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It is estimated that the above accounts will generate approximately $40,000 annually. These funds would be used for inmate rehabilitation programs, replacement and upgrading of jail appliances, vehicle replacement, and staff training. Some of the uses of these fees in the past year have been to purchase washing machines for each floor, clothing for indigent inmates, the GED Program, religious services materials for inmates, and library supplies. We have also used these funds for the purchase of supplies for the operation of the Leaf Collection Program. ~-3 The forfeited drug asset seizure is not included in the above estimate, as it is not an ongoing revenue source. When the current balance is expended, it will not be replaced unless there is a vice operation that would involve our office. We were fortunate to be involved in a program in 1992 that generated about $150,000. I plan to use these funds for replacing worn out laundry equipment, kitchen equipment, and upgrading the vehicle fleet. It will probably be toward the end of 1993 before all the drug seizure money is received and we can complete the replacements. FISCAL IMPACT: -0- ALTERNATIVES: The alternative would be to operate the accounts independently of the Roanoke County Finance Department, and failure to follow the accounting practices as suggested by the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Attorney General's unofficial opinion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Res~p/ectfully submitted, Gerald S. Holt Sheriff --------------------------- Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Approv d by, w/' '~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Harrv C Ni n~ to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ~.3 MEMOgANDIIM TO: Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff FROM: Joseph B. Obenshain Senior Assistant Coun At o n DATE: March 16, 1993 SUBJECT: Sheriff's Office Accounts, Work Release et als. This memo is to record thre understanding which we jointly agreed to as a result of our meeting on February 18, 1993, in my office regarding the proper procedures for handling certain funds currently maieleased Account, the Canteen Accountf andnthed Inmate Inmate Work R Phone Account. 1. Inmate Work Release Accounts The Sheriff's Office will continue to maintain a day-to-day operational checking account for the daily functioning of the work release program pursuant to § 53.1-131. Wages received from the inmate's emploe~ts will be deposited directly to this account, and the paym to third parties authorized by this statute will be made through this account. The "per diem" rate which is authorized under subsection A 1 will be debited on a periodic basis, or when the account balance exceeds the sum of $8,000.00. These debited funds will be deposited into an escrow account designated "Roanoke County Escrow Account for the Sheriff's Office" maintained by the Treasurer of Roanoke County. These "per diem" funds which represent the cost of maintaining work release inmates in the Roanoke County/Salem Jail shall be used to pay for the operating costs of the jail and may be withdrawn from this escrow account by the Treasurer upon the request of the Sheriff for this purpose. 2. Funds which have been accumulating in an Inmate Work Release Savings Account, approximately $3,800 at present, established by a previous sheriff, will be withdrawn from that account to be utilized for the purchase of a computer to be utilized to maintain the Work Release checking account in the future and other records related to work release inmates and of a vehicle for transporting prisoners including work release inmates. 3. The current Canteen Account and Inmate Phone Account will be operated jointly utilizing the deposits from both of these activities for the direct benefit of inmates such as educational, health and physical services and activities. F3 Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Page 2 March 16, 1993 4. The Sheriff will draft a board report to request authorization of the Office of Sheriff to perform criminal background checks and fingerprint checks for potential new employees of businesses in the county who require such checks prior to employment. This requested authorization will be conditioned upon the revenues produced by these activities remaining in the operating budget of the Office of Sheriff as opposed to going into the county's general fund. cc; Paul M. Mahoney, Esq. Reta Busher Diane Hyatt ACTION # A-42793-6 ITEM NUMBER l3 ^' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation to Fund Engineering Consultant Relative to Cost Allocation of Upgrade for the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ F° BACKGROUND• In September 1992, Roanoke County awarded an engineering contract to Finkbeiner, Pettis and Strout (FPS) to assist the City of Salem, Botetourt County, Roanoke County and Town of Vinton in negotiations with the City of Roanoke for upgrade of the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities. DISCUSSION• Finkbeiner, Pettis and Strout have completed their initial work and prepared a cost allocation report that was reviewed with the Board and the other municipalities. The four municipalities have requested FPS to represent them in the actual negotiations with Roanoke City. The original contract with FPS provided for this work on an hourly fee basis. The estimated cost to Roanoke County for this work is $12,000. FISCAL IMPACT• Funds are available from the unused money in the Starkey Sewer Pump Station Project. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate an additional $12,000 from the money available within the Starkey Sewer Pump Station Project to fund the Consultant Engineering Contract with FPS. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: G-i ,~ Clifford P.E. Utility Director -rrvr../ ~~~-~- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Denied ( ) to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke x to Minnix Nickens cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Yes Abs ~_ x ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~r , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Finance Agreement with Richfield for Payment of Water Connection Fees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~~ 4 `'~,~~~~~G BACKGROUND• Richfield has previously requested that Roanoke County pay the $125,100 water connection fee for Richfield's 60 unit/90 bed facility currently under construction. The Board of Supervisors declined to pay the water connection fee because Richfield's facility could not meet the requirement of the current policy whereby the Board could pay the fees. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Richfield has requested to be allowed to pay the water connection fee over a three year period with no interest charged as a recognition of their economic benefit to the County. The County water ordinance provides that any water user can request to pay the water connection fee in thirty-six equal monthly payments. The ordinance requires that the fee first be increased by twenty percent to include interest over the thirty-six months. In this case the twenty percent is $25,020. ALTERNATIVES AND FISCAL IMPACT: Alternative One: The Board of Supervisors would approve an agreement with Richfield whereby Richfield could pay the $125,100 water connection fee in thirty-six equal payments and the County would pay the $25,020 increase required by the water ordinance. G-a This alternative would recognize the economic benefit of the new facilities constructed by a non-profit organization while maintaining the equitable requirements of the water ordinance for all uses. This alternative would require a $25,020 payment from the General Fund to the Utility Fund. Alternative Two: The Board of Supervisors would approve an agreement with Richfield whereby Richfield could pay the $125,100 water connection fee in thirty-six equal payments with no interest charge. This alternative would require modification of the County Water Ordinance and would reduce the income to the Utility Fund by $25,020. Alternative Three: The Board of Supervisors would approve an agreement with Richfield under the provisions of the County Water Ordinance including the twenty percent increase of the water connection fee. This alternative would provide for $25,020 additional income for the County and a corresponding increase in cost for Richfield. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve Alternative One and authorize the $25,020 payment from the appropriate General Fund. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Denied ( ) Eddy _ Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke _ to Minnix _ Nickens Yes Abs ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER I° '"~ ATY A VIRGINIA HELDIAT THE ROANORE COUNTY UADMINISTRATION CENTOER COUNT , MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session on May 11, 1993 to Discuss the Drainage Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting time on the May 11, 1993 agenda for a Work Session to discuss the drainage program. Discussion will include how many projects are completed, an update on current projects, and future plans for the program. Staff from Engineering & Inspections will be available to answer any questions you may have. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a Work Session on the Drainage Program be scheduled for May 11, 1993 ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for May 25, 1993 Worksession; Worksession on Illegal Dumping in Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The Department of Planning and Zoning is responsible for enforcing Section 13-14 of the County Code pertaining to the illegal dumping of materials within the County. The problem of illegal dumping in the County appears to be intensifying. Currently we are aware of 58 illegal dumps located throughout the County. The staff anticipates that illegal dumping will increase with the opening of the Smith Gap Landfill. The purpose of the worksession is to give the Board a detailed overview on the seriousness of the illegal dumping problem in the County, and to advise the Board on staff initiatives to address the problem. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors schedule a May 25, 1993 worksession to discuss illegal dumping in Roanoke County Respectfully Submitted, ~.._ ..l, Terrance L. Har gton, AICP Director of P1 ning and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. odge County Administrator It-o~. Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ACTION NO. /,/ ITEM NUMBER r AT A REGGiNAR HELDIAT TAE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIR MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session on June 8, 1993 with Sheriff Holt COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting time on the June 8, 1993 agenda for a Work Session with Sheriff Gerald Holt. The work session will be held at the jail after the regular meeting. Following the work session, Sheriff Holt has invited the Board to dinner served from the jail kitchen. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a Work Session with Sheriff Holt be scheduled for June 8, 1993 at the Roanoke County Jail. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the State Code and Section 3.07 of the County Charter require that any increase in the salary of the members of the Board of Supervisors be accomplished by ordinance after a public hearing between May 1 and June 30. Does the Board wish to schedule a public hearing on this matter? If so, please provide staff with direction as to amount of percentage increase. The Code provides that the annual salary may be increased by an inflation factor not to exceed 5~. Respectfully submitted, ~.~,-.~r ~tl1~ M1 I ~~ ~ ' Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to c:\wp51\agenda\generaMequest.ph Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Ye Abs 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "`~' t °' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for May 25, 1993. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial indoor amusement area, located at 5383 W. Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Natasha Ross. (2) An ordinance to rezone a .359 acre parcel from C-2 to AV to operate an office, located at 7155 Bent Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Blue Ridge International Limited Liability Co. (3) An ordinance to amend the Special Exception Permit to reflect the actual surveyed acreage of the area originally permitted and to incorporate lands acquired for the entrance, tipper building and rail yard associated with the regional landfill at Smith Gap, located northwest side of Fort Lewis Mountain between Smith Gap and Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR'S OFFICE. ,SI- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and rezoning ordinances for the reading and public hearing adopt the first reading of these purpose of scheduling the second for May 25, 1993. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~ ' .,~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs I V ; ~~ S. ~ ~ 13 ND ~~\ 7 _ 9 ,~ ~ ' ' ~ % is ~-J ~ ~ i ~ c~ _ ~.- \ _:ji " t.~ ~ 4 \ Jm Lea~~ ~`~ ~'. I2 ~' ~ e /' 17 ~~ j s ~ \ ` Q.r i 4A2 Ac. c , :~ sma 25 \\ 1''' ~ r ~ / ta,~ \ Mlner L_an6, )25ac `\ ~ ~ 271 \ \ ~. ~. t9 3_ ~\` m `v; _ L2i ac \ . \ \ I r .., J`' ~ 20.1 `.i ~ )' ~ ~ L_5 ac ~ ~ 19 sera 3 0:. J,, J c'I o . F / ~\2"/ ~r~~i 23 '~ ~ 21 `~ etJ~ce \tee\ 1 a yz ac \ ~ L04ctct (S 5 • \' 1 Is a~ tc __ _ ~o• VEStMEN 30, P `N 22 ~ ,I PPOt?N ?j I ~ ~ se- ~ I F 577 ~Ac ~ ~' 06'I f 3` / ~~ j / ,.a o A ~ , ~. JB.2 C a .` ` ~ / / / 14 ' •'6 1 J \ • `', 1 1 v 1.02 ac;~) \ \ L.'S tc (O 33 JJ7 )) .i~3i7 /~ ~ // .. 16 ~.4N~;~J ~C- / ,o. Poo" } DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING _' ~ ~ AND ZONING 3, ? . .• ~C~.c; ~rSUA ~C~i'S =~ \. ` ~. 12 c 3367' ~ \~' 9 ;• y\ 3 `w c IO 9 . ~0 2.i5 Ac 32 -. 3 ~ \ ~ \ 1 ~ ~' `3331 ~~ ` 7 ~. ~t. JyO \ \ \ . ~ ~ 29 ' y'~sce O \ ~ Z ~Ju ;: z32 ` I ~' SJT4 \ '\ 3339 t _ ~"~ 26 27 \\ /3326 \. ~ \/ 37 L22ac. ' a0adD) 28 \ ! ,.25 27aac(033<J 112ti ~ • On Crurcn ~ 6 , 2 Q S e 20 ~'~ ~ 1 ~ Q\ 24 :587 19 6 ~ 17 ~'..~ \`562., _ Rt. s-a D IJ NORTH 96B ~~ • ~// 16 ~ it' •b :1 I`96T 8 5~• -:-i 1 79 _i~~ I 7952 .\ \ '9,9 ~: 4 _ ' ~ i _.`/ 19 19 5 X936 •Y ` 7: ~ ~. j .~ .~ ~ ~ dtiE~ ~~ i6j9 37 LIOA it ~6/. ,_~ . ib•~ ~~=65~~; ~^ II ~`~~~ ! 'I ,.45 ~c ~ i \. -` ~ ~~ ~~ _~ _Ooks Road ..__ _ ` \ /789IJ (evil . p~•" + DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG ~~ Zc7N!/1L-> KF Q clcST O-~P>~U~: 7S /G6~ •~.~ 2' ~ AND ZONING ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ .A ~ .~ .,, ~~::L ~ L1 ~G 5 = 1 v Y. l . ~+ ~.t -T- ~ ti u L'ti vv v v ~.. n - -~ -r < ti f v ~ V Y VP~. SEG. RTE. Co9(o X5.49' CMARTIU GR~K RD~ R= (470.22' VA. RTE. 22l 50' R/w ...-~ To ROA1.lOY.` --1` THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT ~ ~~ WITHIN TIE LIMITS OP THB loo ~ RAYMOND C. YYEEKS ~. YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS SNOWN ON THE PEMA FLOOD BOUNDARY ~~'~ a•~ MAP.: THZ3 DBTBRMINATZON IS CFR1. M0. BASED ON THE FLOOD BOUNDARY ~ ~.)].j(~)S02 MAP AHD HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED `~~ 54-)7.3(b))20 ~a° BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. 4 CFO /.ANA BAP SURVEY FOR SU5AN1~lE ROYSTER ~F TRAGT 3 ~ °-SL-BD~V15101~1 ~F G.F KEFAt1VE~ ESTATE SITVAT~ atl ~lA. R_TE. Z21 TAX NO. N.B. WW- 34' CALC. o DRAWN SAP CK'D. R.C.W. m RoAt~loKe cr.~L5.t,1T~ VIRGINIA BY: T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINEERS b SURVEYORS , ITD. SALEM VIRGINIA SCALE: t"= 3~~ DATE: ~-T• I-7 1fl w.o. 8~- 2298 D- 31°l48 ~~ amancan Dlwprinf of columbis w ~+ Q -- ~q S Y~ ~~ d a~ .~ ~ m ~~~.~ ~g~~~ ~W ~ ~j-V 0 W0 Z a ~~ ACTION NO. / ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE TO ENFORCE THE PROHIBITED DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER, SURFACE WATER, GROUNDWATER, ROOF RUNOFF OR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, BY REQUIRING CERTAIN CORRECTIONS TO BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES, PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE, DISCONNECTION, AND APPEALS FROM SUCH DETERMINATIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~~~ ~'` EXECUTIVE 5UMMARY• This is the first reading on a proposed ordinance to enforce the County Code prohibition on illegal infiltration and inflow. BACKGROUND• As a result of numerous citizen complaints about raw sewage flooding basements in homes in the lower elevations of the Penn Forest neighborhood, County Utility staff has attempted to identify and alleviate these problems. One component of this utility program involves a vigorous enforcement approach to eliminating infiltration and inflow from private property. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff previously discussed with the Board several enforcement options. Based upon Board comments and direction staff has drafted a proposed ordinance to address this problem. A work session on this draft ordinance was held on April 13, 1993. The attached ordinance incorporates many of these Board concerns. This ordinance provides for a graduated level of enforcement response based upon the amount of infiltration and inflow into the public sewer system from private property. The private property owner is given notice and an opportunity to correct the problem. If the corrective measures are not taken within 6 months, then a monthly surcharge is billed to the owner. Then if the monthly surcharge is not paid when due or if the corrective measures not taken, then sewer service shall be terminated. 1 K-1 The draft ordinance provides for a review procedure by the Utility Director, as well as an appeal procedure with the County Administrator, then the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the first reading of this ordinance. The second reading is scheduled for may 11, 1993. Respectfully submitted, ~~1~r,~`~ f ~`jr~ t„Y''4~`, C t'~t Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to c:\wp51\agenda\code\sser.rpt Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 K- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE TO ENFORCE THE PROHIBITED DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER, SURFACE WATER, GROUNDWATER, ROOF RUNOFF OR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, BY REQUIRING CERTAIN CORRECTIONS TO BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES, PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE, DISCONNECTION, AND APPEALS FROM SUCH DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (also known as the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et se declares a national goal to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters of this country, and that Roanoke Counts Sewer Use Standards ordinance has been adopted to implement this goal, and, WHEREAS, the 1972 sewer agreement between Roanoke County and Roanoke City further implements this national goal by authorizing and requiring certain sampling and inspection actions concerning the discharge of wastes into the public sewer system, and, WHEREAS, the State Water Control Law (Chapter 3.1 of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended) also regulates and controls the discharge of sewage and pollutants into the waters of the Commonwealth, and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-855, of the Code of Virginia, authorizes the regulation and inspection of public and private sewers, and further to prevent the operation of such sewers when they are likely to contribute to the pollution of public or private systems, and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on Apni127, 1993, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 11, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 K- ~ County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following sections of Chapter 18, "Sewers and sewage disposal" be amended to read and provide as follows: Sec.18-156.1. Purpose. It is the policy of this County and the purpose of this ordinance to establish a separate procedure for the enforcement of the Sewer Use Standards (Article IV of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code) arising from the actual or potential illegal discharge of unpolluted stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage into the public sanitary sewer system. The inflow or infiltration of stormwater into the public sewer system constitutes a direct threat to public health, safety and welfare, since this discharge or infiltration overloads the public sewer system, thereby causing sewer overflows and sewer backups into homes and businesses. This discharge or infiltration increases the cost and expense to all sewer users and all County citizens, since the overloads to the sewer system result in higher operating costs at the regional sewage treatment plant and higher capital costs for expansions of the public sewer system. Sec. 18-156.2. Deternunation by Utility Director. (a) The Utility Director, or his designee, shall be vested with the authority and responsibility to enforce the provisions of this ordinance and to make determinations with respect to the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, inflow or infiltration of stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage into the public 2 K- ~ sanitary sewer system. (b) A determination with respect to an actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, inflow or infiltration of stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage into the public sanitary sewer system from the property of a sewer user or any other person shall be based upon the following: (1) estimate or measurement of quantity of inflows and/or infiltration that could occur based on the 2-year rainfall event established for Roanoke County using the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation Drainage Manual. (2) quantity of inflow and/or infiltration shall be in gallon per day. (3) estimate of quantity shall be site specific taking into consideration physical characteristics of the site as they relate to the potential or actual inflow and/or infiltration. (c) The Utility Director, or his designee, shall provide written notice by certified mail to the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person of any violation of this ordinance or of Section 18-156 of this Code. This notice shall describe the nature of the violation, the determination of the actual or potential quantity of the discharge, inflow or infiltration, the corrective measures necessary to achieve compliance, the time period for compliance, the amount of the monthly surcharge until corrected, and the appeal process. Sec. 18-156.3. Surcharge; disconnection (a) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge, infiltration or 3 K- inflow determined to be in excess of 1 000 gallons per day into the public sanitary sewer system, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be given six months to correct the illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the illegal or improper discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 18-156.2(c), then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of 200 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible parry fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. During and after periods of heavy rainfall resulting in actual or potential inflow or infiltration in excess of 200 gallons per day, the Utility Director may in his discretion temporarily terminate the sewer connection to protect the public sewer system and other sewer users. If the corrective measures are not completed within twelve (12) months after the initial notification, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property and disconnect the customer from the system. (b) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge, infiltration or inflow determined to be less than 1 000 al~lons,per day but more than 500 gallons yer day into the public sanitary sewer system, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be given six months to correct the actual or potential illegal or improper 4 K-I activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 18-156.2(c), then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of 100 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible party fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. During and after periods of heavy rainfall resulting in actual or potential inflow or infiltration in excess of 200 gallons per day, the Utility Director may in his discretion temporarily terminate the sewer connection to protect the public sewer system and other sewer users. If the corrective measures are not completed within twelve (12) months after the initial notification, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property and disconnect the customer from the system. (c) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge, infiltration or inflow determined to be less than 500 alg ions per d~ but more than 200 gallons yer day into the public sanitary sewer system, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be given six months to correct the illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, 5 K• ~ infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 18-156.2(c), then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of 50 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible parry fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. During and after periods of heavy rainfall resulting in actual or potential inflow or infiltration in excess of 200 gallons per day, the Utility Director may in his discretion temporarily terminate the sewer connection to protect the public sewer system and other sewer users. If the corrective measures are not completed within twelve (12) months after the initial notification, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property and disconnect the customer from the system. (d) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge, infiltration or inflow determined to be less than 200 alg lops per day but more than 50 s~allons yer day into the public sanitary sewer system, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be given six months to correct the illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the illegal or improper discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 6 K-1 18-156.2(c), then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of 25 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible party fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. If the corrective measures are not completed within twelve (12) months after the initial notification, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property and disconnect the customer from the system. Sec. 18-156.4. Review of Corrective Measures The sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall correct the actual or potential illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. These corrective measures to eliminate the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sewer system shall be taken upon notice form the Utility Director or his designee. Once these corrective measures have been implemented, the sewer user, property owner, or other responsible person shall request in writing that the Utility Director or his designee inspect the corrective measures to verify compliance with this chapter. Any monthly surcharge imposed by the provisions of this ordinance, or any termination of water and sewer service arising from a failure to pay the monthly surcharge or a failure to implement the corrective measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system, shall continue until 7 K-I the Utility Director or his designee determines that the corrective measures are in compliance with the provisions of this chapter. If water and sewer services have been terminated under this ordinance, the sewer user, property owner, or other responsible person may request resumption of water and sewer service as follows: (1) By taking the corrective measures specified in the notice, and by eliminating the actual or potential discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. (2) By requesting an inspection and determination by the Utility Director or his designee as provided in this section. (3) By submitting a written request to the Utility Director requesting reinstatement of public water and sewer services and verifying that all standards of this chapter have been satisfied. Sec. 18-156.5. Appeals (a) Any sewer user, property owner, or responsible person may appeal a determination of the Utility Director or his designee by submitting a Notice of Appeal to the County Administrator within fourteen (14) days from the receipt of the written notice as provided in § 18.1-156.2 (c). (b) The County Administrator shall conduct a hearing on this appeal within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this Notice of Appeal. The County Administrator shall render a decision with five (5) business days of the date of the hearing. 8 K-I (c) The Notice of Appeal shall state the technical grounds and objections for the appeal. At the hearing the County Administrator shall hear and investigate any objection that may be raised and take such action as may be appropriate under the facts and circumstances established. (d) The sewer user, property owner, or other responsible person may appeal the decision of the County Administrator to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by submitting to the Clerk of the Board a written Notice of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of the County Administrator's written decision. This Notice of Appeal shall state the grounds for the appeal. (e) In all other respects the substantive and procedural requirements for this appeal shall comply with the provisions of § 15.1-550, et seq. of the State Code. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. c:\wp5l~agenda\code~sse.r 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ! \ " pZ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A .69 ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN CONNECTION WITH THE CLEANUP OF THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL - TAX PARCEL 64.01-4-33 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND: In August of 1992 Roanoke County executed an "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action" with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA to action at the Dixie Caverns Landfill siteerf This removal response action includes work to remove stream sediments containing heavy metal contaminants: lead, cadmium and zinc, which may have been released from the site. This consent order places many obligations and responsibilities on the County. One of these responsibilities includes obtaining access to the site from present owners. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame, it is necessary to acquire fee simple title to a .69 acre parcel of real estate located at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road (Route 647) and Twine Hollow Road (Route 778). This parcel is identified as Tax Parcel 64.01-4-33 and is owned by Branch & Associates, Inc. Acquisition of this real estate will allow access to the site, provide a materials storage area, and an area for equipment parking. Attached copies of site maps and assessment records. FISCAL IMPACTS: $4,500 expenditure of County funds from the Dixie Caverns Account. 1 f r 1~ ~ ALTERNATIVES• 1. Purchase of the site. 2. Seek alternative access and storage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of Alternative 1 - Purchase of the site. Respectfully submitted, T~. ~ ~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 K-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A .69 ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN CONNECTION WITH THE CLEANUP OF THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL - TAX PARCEL 64.01-4-33 WHEREAS, in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill and in order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame as set out in the "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action," it is necessary to acquire fee simple title to a .69 acre parcel of real estate located at the intersection of Dow Hollow Road (Route 647) and Twine Hollow Road (Route 778). This parcel is identified as Tax Parcel 64.01-4-33 and is owned by Branch & Associates, Inc. Acquisition of this real estate will allow access to the site, provide a materials storage area, and an area for equipment parking; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said parcel from Branch & Associates, Inc. for the sum of $4,500, being the estimated fair market value based upon an appraisal; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1993; the second reading was held on May 11, 1993; and THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Branch & Associates, Inc. a .69-acre parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 64.01-4-33 for an amount not to exceed $4,500 which shall be paid out of the funds available for the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute K-a such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\rea-est\dixie.ord METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. Q~ ~O~ ~~~ QO ,~Q' ~J~ Q' ~ QQ~ o ,o Q' ^ ~o SINCLAIR BURKS D.H.514, PG.411 64,01-4-33 TAX MAP N0._______________ '• ~ i i o ~z~oi• .O 2i~ i , ~~02 D~ 9 ~9 ~r' C` .~O . / ii EREDDIE J^E ~' GRANT --~. ~~. S 86~ '45'00" E ~ q a ~ O ~~ 0 ~^~ ~b u ~O" =O ~~~~ J~~ ,` ~O SCALE: 1"=50' PLAT SH^WING PR^PERTY BEING C^NVEYED T^ THE C^UNTY ^F R^AN^KE AND R^AN^KE ELECTRIC STEEL C^RP^RATI^N BY BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, INC^RP^RATED PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: _ 4 / 21/ 9 3 Vote Corrected 5/4/93 ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-7 ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDIILE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES RELATED TO TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PARADES AND BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR CONCEALED WEAPON8 PERMITS AND CONSERVATORS OF THE PEACE WHEREAS, the current economic climate has required local governments including the County of Roanoke to carefully examine the nature and level of services which it provides to its citizens and the sources of funding for these services; and WHEREAS, in the interest of equity and fairness it is the policy of the County of Roanoke to charge the specified individual or group for services which are for the specific benefit of such individual or group; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department will be required to provide the services of several uniformed offices and a supervisor for a minimum of two hours in order to provide traffic control for any parade conducted in the county, excepting those parades travelling only within a specified residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department detectives currently expend, on average, 12 hours in completing the legally mandated background investigations for the circuit court judges as a precondition for their issuance of concealed weapons permits or appointment of individuals as conservators of the peace in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, the judges of the 23rd Judicial Circuit have urged that the localities within their jurisdiction adopt a uniform schedule of fees for the performance of such background investigations and the Roanoke City Council has recently adopted a fee schedule providing for an initial fee of $250.00 for such investigations and a fee of $25.00 for renewal every two years; and WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. The following schedule of administrative fees to be paid by any person applying for a parade permit in accordance with Sec. 14-23(b) of the Roanoke County Code is hereby established: Class I parade: Location: Any parade travelling upon any primary road in Roanoke County; Any parade meeting the following size criteria travelling upon any secondary road or street in Roanoke County; Size: Any combination of 10 or more vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or 50 or more participants; Fee: Calculated by multiplying the number of officers required for traffic control over the route of the parade (A) by the number of hours the parade is expected to last (a minimum of 2 hours for each officer) (B) by the standard hourly rate for uniformed officers as set by the Chief of Police to apply for each fiscal year (C). [A x B x C = Administrative Fee]. Class II parade• Location: Secondary road or street in Roanoke County; Size: Less than 10 vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or less than 50 Fee: Class III Qarade• Location: Entirely within a residential area of Roanoke County and not travelling upon or crossing any primary road; Fee: None 2. The following schedule of fees shall be charged by the Roanoke County Police Department for the services described: Concealed weapons permit background investigation and report: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 Conservator of the Peace appointment: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 3. Any fees collected under this ordinance shall be deposited in an account for the benefit of the Roanoke County Police Department personnel costs. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance as modified by the County Attorney's Office, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Nickens participants; A COPY TESTE: ->-y~ ~. Mary H.6~Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney John Cease, Chief, Police Department Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue John M. Chambliss, Jr, Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Familv Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry L °! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-7 ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES RELATED TO TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PARADEB AND BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS AND CONSERVATORS OF THE PEACE WHEREAS, the current economic climate has required local governments including the County of Roanoke to carefully examine the nature and level of services which it provides to its citizens and the sources of funding for these services; and WHEREAS, in the interest of equity and fairness it is the policy of the County of Roanoke to charge the specified individual or group for services which are for the specific benefit of such individual or group; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department will be required to provide the services of several uniformed offices and a supervisor for a minimum of two hours in order to provide traffic control for any parade conducted in the county, excepting those parades travelling only within a specified residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department detectives currently expend, on average, 12 hours in completing the legally mandated background investigations for the circuit court judges as a precondition for their issuance of concealed weapons permits or appointment of individuals as conservators of the peace in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, the judges of the 23rd Judicial Circuit have urged that the localities within their jurisdiction adopt a uniform schedule of fees for the performance of such. background investigations and the Roanoke City Council has recently adopted a fee schedule providing for an initial fee of $250.00 for such investigations and a fee of $25.00 for renewal every two years; and WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. The following schedule of administrative fees to be paid by any person applying for a parade permit in accordance with Sec. 14-23(b) of the Roanoke County Code is hereby established: Class I parade• Location: Any parade travelling upon any primary road in Roanoke County; Any parade meeting the following size criteria travelling upon any secondary road or street in Roanoke County; Size: Any combination of 10 or more vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or 50 or more participants; Fee: Calculated by multiplying the number of officers required for traffic control over the route of the parade (A) by the number of hours the parade is expected to last (a minimum of 2 hours for each officer) (B) by the standard hourly rate for uniformed officers as set by the Chief of Police to apply for each fiscal year (C). [A x B x C = Administrative Fee]. Class II parade• Location: Secondary road or street in Roanoke County; 2 Size: Fee: Class III parade• Location: Entirely within a residential area of Roanoke County and not travelling upon or crossing any primary road; Fee: None 2. The following schedule of fees shall be charged by the Roanoke County Police Department for the services described: Concealed weapons permit background investigation and report: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 Conservator of the Peace appointment: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 3. Any fees collected under this ordinance shall be deposited in an account for the benefit of the Roanoke County Police Department personnel costs. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance as modified by the County Attorney's Office, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None 3 Less than 10 vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or less than 50 participants; ABSENT: Supevisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonweath Attorney John Cease, Chief, Police Department Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue John M. Chambliss, Jr, Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Familv Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. `' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES RELATED TO TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PARADES AND BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS AND CONSERVATORS OF THE PEACE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: a EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY This ordinance adopts a classification for parades and a graduated fee structure to permit Roanoke County to partially recoup the cost of police services for traffic control during parades in the county. It also establishes a fee for police background investigations for concealed weapons permits and conservators of the peace consistent with the fee authorized for Roanoke City Police. BACKGROUND• Section 14-23(b) of the Parade Ordinance of the County of Roanoke which was amended and reenacted in February, 1993, authorizes the county to charge an administrative fee to cover "the direct, anticipated costs of traffic control" based upon classes of parades in accordance with Sec. 14-8. Prior to the reenactment of this Parade Ordinance, the Police Department had been charging Roanoke County Schools for its overtime costs related to school parades such as the Cave Spring High School Homecoming Parade. Last year the Roanoke County Police Department conducted 28 background investigations for concealed weapons permit applications as required by § 18.2-308. Each of these investigations requires an average of 12 hours by one of the detectives for a total of approximately 336 police hours per year. The judges of the Twenty- Third Judicial Circuit, of which Roanoke County is a part, have indicated their approval of local jurisdictions legally adopting a reasonable fee which is uniform throughout this circuit. The Police Department also conducts approximately 6 to 8 background investigations on applications for appointment of conservators of the peace pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia. L-/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The ordinance establishes three classifications of parades based upon the Police Departments experience with the differing manpower requirements for traffic control necessitated by different sizes and locations of parades. A Class III parade is one which is conducted entirely within a defined residential area, e.g., Green Valley, and, therefore, could be monitored by one district officer with little actual traffic direction. A Class II parade would encompass any small parade, less than 50 participants or 10 units or vehicles, which may use a secondary road or frequently travelled street but which could be handled by one or, at the most, two uniformed officers. All parades utilizing a primary road would be considered Class I parades. Similarly, parades larger than Class II parades and travelling upon a secondary road would be Class I parades. An administrative fee would be calculated based upon the expected size and duration of the parade and the number of uniformed officers who would be required for traffic control at intersections and other major points considering the location of the parade route. The Chief of Police will establish a standard hourly fee for officers for each fiscal year. The current hourly fee charged by the Police Department for extra duty assignments of its officers is $18.00. A two hour minimum must be charged in order to induce officers to accept these assignments. No charge will be made for the supervisors assigned to any parade. The City of Roanoke approved a fee schedule in July, 1992, which imposed an initial charge of $250.00 for the initial investigation for both concealed weapons permits and conservator of the peace appointments. This figure closely approximates the average personnel expense to the Police Department for a detec- tive's time in a 12 hour investigation. The renewal fee which reoccurs every 2 years will be $25.00. These fees would be credited to the Police Department's personnel account to assist with the overtime budget impacted by these extra responsibilities. FISCAL IMPACTS• Increased revenue of approximately $10,000.00 per year may be realized by Roanoke County. This is based upon an estimate of 36 initial background investigations and 5 parades not exceeding two hours in duration and requiring 5 officers for traffic control. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Adopt the proposed fee schedule . 2. Continue to fund these Police Department services out of budgeted general fund accounts. 2 1,,. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, Jo ph ~. bbenshain S for Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs 3 L-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-_ ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES RELATED TO TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PARADES AND BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS AND CONSERVATORS OF THE PEACE WHEREAS, the current economic climate has required local governments including the County of Roanoke to carefully examine the nature and level of services which it provides to its citizens and the sources of funding for these services; and WHEREAS, in the interest of equity and fairness it is the policy of the County of Roanoke to charge the specified individual or group for services which are for the specific benefit of such individual or group; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department will be required to provide the services of several uniformed offices and a supervisor for a minimum of two hours in order to provide traffic control for any parade conducted in the county, excepting those parades travelling neighborhood; and only within a specified residential WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department detectives currently expend, on average, 12 hours in completing the legally mandated background investigations for the circuit court judges as a precondition for their issuance of concealed weapons permits or appointment of individuals as conservators of the peace in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and L-f WHEREAS, the judges of the 23rd Judicial Circuit have urged that the localities within their jurisdiction adopt a uniform schedule of fees for the performance of such background investigations and the Roanoke City Council has recently adopted a fee schedule providing for an initial fee of $250.00 for such investigations and a fee of $25.00 for renewal every two years; and WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. The following schedule of administrative fees to be paid by any person applying for a parade permit in accordance with Sec. 14-23(b) of the Roanoke County Code is hereby established: Class I parade: Location: Any parade travelling upon any primary road in Roanoke County; Any parade meeting the following size criteria travelling upon any secondary road or street in Roanoke County; Size: Any combination of 10 or more vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or 50 or more participants; Fee: Calculated by multiplying the number of officers required for traffic control over the route of the parade (A) by the number of hours the parade is expected to last (a minimum of 2 hours for each officer) (B) by the standard hourly rate for uniformed officers as set by the Chief of Police to apply for each fiscal year (C). [A x B x C = Administrative Fee]. 2 '~ f Class II parade: Location: Secondary road or street in Roanoke County; Size: Less than 10 vehicles, large animals, floats or marching units or less than 50 participants; Fee: $36.00. Class III parade: Location: Entirely within a residential area of Roanoke County and not travelling upon or crossing any primary road; Fee: None 2. The following schedule of fees shall be charged by the Roanoke County Police Department for the services described: Concealed weapons permit background investigation and report: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 Conservator of the Peace appointment: Initial application and issuance for 2 years .... $250.00 Biennial renewal thereafter ..................... $ 25.00 3. Any fees collected under this ordinance shall be deposited in an account for the benefit of the Roanoke County Police Department personnel costs. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its adoption. c:~wp50~agenda~police.fee 3 ~.' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-8 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 4.0-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE R. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT WHEREAS, in order to provide the main access to the reservoir and the pump station for the Spring Hollow Reservoir project, the County requires a certain parcel of land, consisting of 4.0 acres by deed and 2.030 acres by survey, in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said property from Davis and Widney for the sum of $6,000.00, in lieu of eminent domain proceedings previously authorized by the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1993; and the second reading was held on April 27, 1993. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney a 4.0-acre (2.030-acre by survey) tract of land, identified as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7, together with all rights incident thereto and appurtenances thereunto belonging, and together with all right, title and interest in and to the adjoining parcel of land where the family cemetery is located, for an amount not to exceed $6,000.00, plus agreement to maintain, and reasonable access for the property owners to, the family cemetery. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Clifford Craig, Director, Utility ACTION NO. ITEM NO. Lam' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 4.0-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE R. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: / ~+Z't'~Jy~'~Yy'~--r--~'~~~ ~ ~C~'1f'C.-~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of a parcel of land, consisting of 4.0 acres, more or less, (2.030 acres by survey), together with all rights incident thereto and appurtenances thereunto belonging, and together with all right, title and interest in and to the adjoining parcel of land where the family cemetery is located, from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Proj ec~. BACKGROUND• The subject property is necessary for the Spring Hollow Reservoir project, in order to provide the main access to the reservoir and the pump station. This parcel of land, consisting of 4.0 acres by deed, but of 2.030 acres by survey, is owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne K. Widney. In November of 1991, staff obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value for the proposed acquisition from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRPA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. The appraiser's opinion was that the estimated market value was $2,358.30 per acre. Based upon the surveyed acreage of 2.030, the estimated fair market value of the property was $4,800.00. Staff was unable to reach an agreement with the owners for the purchase of the property. Staff had extended a written offer of $4,000.00, subject to Board approval; the owners made a verbal counter-offer $20,000.00 for purchase. Consequently, Staff recommended that the Board authorize acquisition of the property through eminent domain proceedings, with immediate right of entry for commencement of project construction; this was approved by Resolution No. 111991, adopted by the Board on November 19, 1991. L-~ SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has communicated with the property owners on several occasions since the Board authorized condemnation. The owners have verbally indicated that they will accept the sum of $6,000.00 for the purchase of their property and a contract of sale has been sent for written confirmation of this agreement. The owners have also requested, as part of the transaction, that the County agree to maintain the family cemetery located on an adjoining parcel of land and to grant the owners reasonable access for visits to the cemetery. FISCAL IMPACTS• The purchase price of $6, 000.00 for the property would be paid from the Spring Hollow account; funds are available from Bond proceeds. The proposed price is greater than the appraised value per survey as of November 7, 1991, but this purchase would eliminate the uncertainty of a higher court award, as well as the attendant litigation costs and interest from the date of entry. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative Number 1: Authorize the acquisition of the 4.0- acre parcel of land (2.030 acres by survey), together with all rights incident thereto and appurtenances thereunto belonging, and together with all right, title and interest in and to the adjoining parcel of land where the family cemetery is located, from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney for the sum of $6,000.00, plus agreement by the County to maintain the family cemetery, and the grant of reasonable access for the owners to visit said cemetery. Alternative Number 2: Proceed with condemnation as previously authorized by the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative Number 1. Re pectfully submitt d, is ie L. H n Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs L- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 4.0-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM JOSEPH H. DAVIS AND SUZANNE R. WIDNEY FOR THE SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT WHEREAS, in order to provide the main access to the reservoir and the pump station for the Spring Hollow Reservoir project, the County requires a certain parcel of land, consisting of 4.0 acres by deed and 2.030 acres by survey, in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, owned by Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said property from Davis and Widney for the sum of $6,000.00, in lieu of eminent domain proceedings previously authorized by the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1993; and the second reading was held on April 27, 1993. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Joseph H. Davis and Suzanne R. Widney a 4.0-acre (2.030-acre by survey) tract of land, identified as Tax Map No. 73.00-1-7, together with all rights incident thereto and appurtenances thereunto belonging, and together with all right, title and interest in and to the adjoining parcel of land where the family cemetery is located, for an amount not to exceed $6,000.00, ~'~ plus agreement to maintain, and reasonable access for the property owners to, the family cemetery. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actin s on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. y~i=1 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 42793-9 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM N - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 27, 1993 designated as Item N - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - April 6, 1993. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. 3. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.13 Miles of Tinkerdale Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4. Donation of Right-of-Way in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. 5. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Golden View Acres. 6. Donation of Drainage Easement on Lot 6, Block 1, Section 23, of Hunting Hills Subdivision to the Board of Supervisors. 7. Acceptance of Donation of an Access Easement from the Salem Stone Corporation in Connection with the Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney it 6, 1993 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 April 6, 1993 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and a special meeting for the purpose of a budget work session. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 8:35 a.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzz " Lee B. Eddy, Supervisors BobMLnnJohnson a EdwardmGn Kohinke, Sr., Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT; None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer IN RE: COIINTY BIIDGET PRESENTATION 1• New Positions County Administrator Elmer Hodge reported that the staff used a new approach to the budget by using the management teams to review and prioritize the departmental addback requests. budget work session. Supervisor Eddy asked for a response to his memo regarding bulk and brush collection. Supervisors Nickens and Kohinke advised that they did not support a second monthly brush pickup. Mr. Hodge stated that he would bring back more information to the next work session. 3. Economic Develo went and Tourism Mr. Hodge recommended using the additional $300,000 from the increased transient occupancy tax as follows: (1) increase contributions to the Convention and Visitors Bureau by $44,332; (2) provide a $100,000 matching grant to Explore; and C3) repay the General Fund in the amount of $155,668 for improvements to Rutrough Road. He also recommended that $75,000 be using for training First Union employees and $53,833 has been included to increase funding to the Economic Development Partnership. Supervisors Johnson and Kohinke advised that they did not support increasing the contribution to the Convention and Visitors Bureau. Supervisor Minnix announced that he did not support funding for Explore until it was self sustaining, and Supervisor Eddy asked Mr. Hodge to find out if other localities would be asked to fund the project. 4• Em to ee Salaries and Benefits Mr. Hodge advised that $606,183 had been reserved from the current Unappropriated Fund Balance for employee benefits. He advised that the Salary Survey Team recommended full I it 6, 1993 funds coming from the Board of Supervisors. He advised that there will be no reduction in programs, and there will be increases in the textbook fund and a small increase in instructional materials. He also advised that there will be an increase of two DARE officers funded by the Police Department budget. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson who noted that the Police Department budget only calls for one DARE officer, Mr. Hodge responded that the County is applying for a grant that will fund the other one. Mr. Thomas reported that their top priority was salary and benefits for their employees. Salaries will be increased by an average of three percent, and employee health insurance premi~ims will be reduced by $25 per month. Dr. Wilson added that they would like to begin to remove the current salary tier arrangements by steps. Dr. Jerry Hardy, Director of Budget and Data Management described the tier process and how this would change. In response to questions from the Board of Supervisors, Dr. Wilson advised that salary increases in Roanoke City average 4.1% and 3% in the City of Salem. Mr. Thomas advised that Dr. Wilson~s salary and benefits package had not been finalized but he anticipates a 3% salary increase and the same benefits packa e as last year. g Supervisor Nickens asked Dr. Wilson to survey other locality school systems for a comparison of payment for unused w A-42793-9.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the April 13, 1993 meeting. Library Board Supervisor Kohinke nominated Shirley Van Riper to a four-year term, representing the Catawba Magisterial District. Her term will expire December 31, 1995. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that this appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, .J~• ~~ `l Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob L. .7ohnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Library Board File ACTION NO. A-42793-9.b ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.13 Miles of Tinkerdale Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective April 2, 1993. North Burlington 0.13 Miles of Tinkerdale Road (Route 1860) SUBMITTED BY: ma~~- ~. C~~y Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPRO~D BY ~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x ) Motion by: Rob r, _ ,Tohnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ~' ACTION NO. A-42793-9.c ITEM NO / ~ e t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of right-of-way in connection with Homeland Hills Road Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easement to the County of Roanoke for right-of-way purposes in relation to the Homeland Hills Road Project in the Vinton Magisterial District Supervisor. a) Donation of an easement from Mark D. Steinle, Melanie C. Steinle, Harry F. Hambrick, Jr., Trustee, Martin R. Willis, Trustee, Werner C. Steinle and Eldora M. Steinle, Beneficiaries and C. John Renick, Sole Acting Trustee, (Deed Book 1235, page 303) (Tax Map No. 89.00) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering & Inspections Department, dated February 10, 1992. The location and dimensions of this property has been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends acceptance of this project. ~'`~ U ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge Engineering & Inspections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To Eddy ~_ Johnson Y Kohinke _~ Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utility _- ME LS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. _ ~~ PROPERTY OF FRANK W. & JANICE G. e~ STIFF ~~ ~ TAX NO. 89.00-4-35 ~ ry0 /~~ gory TIMBERLAND TRAIL " A" - ~- - 'o ~ss~`~ PROPERTY OF ?9A, ~~, BRYON BROWN 0, , TAX N0.8900-4-45.2 PROPOSED \ RIGHT-OF-WAY (0.048 Ac.) TAX MAP N0. REMAINING PROPERTY OF MARK D. & MELANIE C. STEINLE D.B. 1138 PG. 678 ~o 'p°~v zo PROPERTY OF CHRISTOPHER M. do BARB WILLIAMS TAX N0.8900-4-43 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING A 73.8100' 75.3888' 41.3536' 72.1543' S'47'W 89.00-4-36 1„=50" SCALE: _______ PLAT SHOWf NG PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY MARK D. & MELANIE C. STEINLE PREPARED B Y.• R OANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 02 _ 10 _9 2 REVISION: 09-18-92 f ~y ACTION # A-42793-9.d ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Golden View Acres COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Golden View requested that Roanoke County and sanitary sewer facilities all necessary easements. Acres, Elite Developers, Inc., have accept the Deed conveying the water serving the subdivision along with The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by John Abbott, P.E., C.L.S. entitled Golden View Acres, dated October 4, 1989, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $30,000 and $ 74,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Golden View Acres subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: C~Q~. Clifford raig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ N-5 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x to Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections r w.run. I LJ alj ~--,..._., F~' r---- ~aa ------~MO a x. uc .a 4 fm • •Atw 7. mmcn ~+ . `•J F ^ _ w.rou ~- nu+oec dry ~ ~_ ~. ro~,~n .::~ n lMa1 u~BBrt O ~ P.xxISY __ O ~. corral' Q]' TO C OJCJI. INV. I ~ ~I = R I B j° -- s I t (N: I i -- ~~ I ~.`~ SETTEE I . ..=t ~..' TG wv. ~~ ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT FACILITIES SERVING GOLDEN VIEW ACRES /V-5 C) E E C) ~ F E ;4 c E !mot E ~! ?- A [~.~ L~ A S S I c; ni !~! E ~! -!~" TN,IS [?EEn, nEEn nF F6CEtviFNT pin AccrrtiMENT M„a~A t.hi5Fit,l~ clay of _Jan4!ary 14Q~ by anti hct,~rccn= Elite Ilp,iplnnnrc~ Tnrnr n a ari hors' ar a orrari f,n gc the "~lavainr}or np ty of ha rc f - ' - =•o- =•: ~ r_ . r ~ _ t.:... f i , ~ t. ?art i t.hC R(16Ri1 (jF CI_IPER\/j C()R` (1G Rf1ANf1KF ('!')IINTV vjRrrNrn,~ 1~crcjnaft,a~- rpfar~ari t•n ac tha "Rnar~j Harty of tF~c carnn~ ~art,j anti ELMEP (~, HnnrE ('n!int~i ~1~Iminictratnr nT F7nannkp ('n!_~rt,y_ ~/TR~Tt~Td,~ nar±v of tha t,hi rd Hart., . W? T N E c c E T H. THAT FC?R ANf_? IN ('nN~jiIERATjnH of the rp!~t•!,al hancfit,c t.n arrrl~pj tha ncvalr~~cr ~incc harphv ~iRANT~ ('(1N1~EY~ AcSjrN ern '~'f?pNC~'ER~ with tnc ~n~/crlantc n* {;ENFRGI 4VARRA,NTY nF TITLE, in fap cirrlnlc iintn tha F2nar~ all ata anti/nr cawar lil~pc_ val~icc~ flt,tin~c_ lat.cralq_ r,nrlnc~t.innc ctnrana fa~ilit,jcc_ Sr~!!rrcc of wat,or c!_!nnly _ ~!-irnnc_ ~n,arhnlpc ~nri ,a,ny and all nt,hcr an~;1r?T°_•n+. ?n!'~ A~?C?!_lrtonanrac tharc!;nt.n. in af?r~ to t.hc Wata~• anti/nr ccwor S~1Sto[I?c in t.hf? ~t.ract,S a~/oni!ac a~!'~ n.,hl~c !_!t.llit.,1, ~!at,cr arrj/nr cawar a, camp - ._.-,.._ ._a.__:,.=.n,t. are~~ tr?e?t r?a,ic F?P.°r! nr nay f-;prnaft.cr t?P_. ingt.allori ~j~ tna ~loi/p~nncr~ aln!ln 4+j t.~'? t.~"1P_. rin~t t,n orn._._i a v ilea nrriinJi t,hc cacpment,c in wl~1C:Ht tl~n ca!!?e flay ~a lnrrat,arl~ ail of \,;hirh jc mn a n__-r_ r- c}~nwn a!l!j ~o_,~!_rihorl anti !~-°_.SiClnafi,ari ~c fnllnWg3 tC? !~li;: A~ sho;.;n C!CI th._. nla.n, P_.7t.it.lori Gnl~!P_.n ~1P_.4! Arroc rj?t,ari ()rtr~hor d_ iQRa marjp by Jahn Ah!~ot.t. - P, E. f%, ~, ~, an~i nR f i to ~ t.}-!a n nko ('ni; Erlvinaarinr~ flanar~,rtipr~t, •_. r.:: Page 1 ~f N-5 The Qeycln~nr rjneS hP.-"oh~i ~nyapa!lt anal yr~~-rpnt that, It ~rlj ~ ~ hP_. !'P_..c_.pC~nSihlo fnr th°_• ~?roner- j^St~111f:j!?~l ?C?!j c!?nStr!~rt.jn!I of tho S?jd 4J?tP_.r ~!?Cf/f?!' cai,.jcr S~StemS 1nc~L-:di.n~ ran~ir of S!_lrff+,!:A ?rpac affected ~ - y Settlement of t;t,j'~ity trenches for ~ erjQcj of nna 11 year f c f r cn p t ~ , _ -- a .ter c!at _ n a.~r_.._ ~.tance by the Bea r~ and h'1~~ ncrfnrm an)~ r!cyacSar~i rc~alfc at jtc ~{iSt. Eimer ~;, ynrfnc~ ('n!_int~ Arir?tjnict,rat.nr of ~2nannkc ('n!_lnt;~, Vjrryinja; party ^f the third !art; hcrchy ninS 1!? t~'?e pKarl!tlf_?C? C?f ~.~'??S jnSt.C:!!!1°_.nt f.!~ SjQnjf,~ the ar~P~tanra of t..h,jS r~'?!IYA;/anrR n!!rS!lant. to F?eSn~!;t14n ~!?. adn~?tcri ~~ t~'1e RnarrJ of 5~1~?~?r~ijcnrc (?f R^annke (=~?llnt;~; Ulr~lnja. ~lITNE~S TyE F(11 wIyr Sj~nat.!lrcc and cca~~; ~o:. _ -- Gev, !] ~~ ; ~;~; As: ~/~/~ ;~~', ~/~ ctat¢ nf: ~. .;c?!.; ty.Gity ~f: ~~g-e~-.-._. ~ to ,~+jfi; Th° fC?re~C?jnn d°°•!j Wa_ c ar~Cnn~W•~c-dnad hafnrc IT!$ tE'1jS; /a ~ day of c,~~Cvtt.ti.e ~ a g' .3 E? y ; ~i",,~1 ~ a S S~ ?2 ~S L ~ Dvl1}~ a!_;th^rized nfficer Titie on heha,lf cf ~~l'T~ ~~ i ~~ C-ns ~i~C p ~, C~GC~C r0 /Y"d1~ Notary P~~hl is !~y r^mmjssjnn eY~jreS; _ ~..e~ J'/ /q j Pa,e ? of 3 N-5 A~nrn;ior~ ~g t^ farm: f'niir~t Arimi ctra n ni: nan ko Cn~,t?±,~~ e±tnr~o~ R ~! F mar r_, ur,~nr3 ~t,ato nf, ~ to wj~: Th°_• f^rA nirl rlncri Wac rk ntr crlna haf ra o ~~i Glmcr ('~ f-Iniincf ('ni~nt,~i Q_~j~;n;c±rat,nry nn haf~al f of t,~p Rnrarrf ~nf Ciincr r cnr,_ C?f R^~~?nk~ ('n~int.ji_ 1/jrn~r~ja, - - _.. r.L-,~1__:S Nnt~r;/ Pt.hl is R~~rjG?~ 1Q/16/90 Page 3 n f 2 ACTION NO. A-42793-9.e ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement on Lot 6, Block 1, Section 23, of Hunting Hills Subdivision to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of an additional easement for drainage purposes, upon, over, under and across the northwestern property line of Lot 6, Block 1, Section 23, Hunting Hills Subdivision, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke as follows: a) Donation of a drainage easement, of variable width, from A. Gary Yamine, Inc., a Virginia corporation (Deed Book 1372, page 1118) (Tax Map No. 87.19-1-8.15), shown and designated as "NEW VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 12 March 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Res ectfully submitted, is ie L. H fm Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections o ~ ~o z ~ ~ Q~ e` N ~z~ ~ o ~ ti C v N OGr7 NERlTAC~E GOR!°OaAT1ON n,~,. 745 n4, X49 TAX '~57.20-l-1 c,or 6 TAX * 87. l R • 1- 6• r5 5 86°31'Op„E 1 23.12'1 EXr57, 20'pRA1NAGE ~ASEMcNT 11/EW VARIAG~LE~ fi (p.l~, 12 PG, 8) Wl17Tt-~ ; nRA/NA,~E I,OT 7 EASEMENT ~ , --- -..._- s~s ~, 3 EX157, 20'SANITAgY 5E{tiEAX '87.Iq • -- 8,16 ~- ~- R ESM' j 1 i~ r O I IN p ail m ~ ZI 1 ,~~ ~ ' ? ~ ExlSr 15'PUgI,IG UTILITY EASEMENT o , ~,~ ~ / ~~~~ ~ ~ ~Ua V E t)ATA 6 - ~~~-~ ~ ~ F{ 55,00' ~J I ~ 3 I r 3~,~1' w ~ A 66, -~' ~ c ~ GNA. G2.2o' D CN~).r3, N 3?°55'10"E ~ 17ENOTES NEW t7t~AINAGE EASEMENT , 2,5 61 5Q- FT, o'c 3 - t c, - 93 ''~0,~ B. LEE HENDE~R,/SON, J~Rt.I ~.w~f-'.rnlG.~-llt. (LICENSE? No. 1480 4 LAND 3URV~~ PLAT SHOWING DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ACROSS TAX #87.19-1-8.15 BEING LOT 6, BLOCK I, SECTION 23 HUNTING HILLS (P.B. 12, PAGE 8) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: I " _= 5 Q ' DATE: 12 MARCH 19 9 3 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. i# q J . 7h ' 7 ~Y- Co L ail. 1 ACTION NO. A-42793-9.f ITEM NO. t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT FROM SALEM STONE CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE CLEANUP OF THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easement from Salem Stone Corporation (Tax Map No. 63.00- 1-13) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill site in the Catawba Magisterial District: a) a parcel of land shown and designated as "CENTERLINE NEW 80' ACCESS EASEMENT FROM POINT A, B, C TO D" "Property of Salem Stone Corp. Tax No. 63.00-01-13, D.B. 1312, Pg. 442" on a plat, dated April 22, 1993, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, a copy of which is attached hereto. County staff has inspected and approved the location and dimensions of the easement for the project. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required for these acquisitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this easement for access to several unnamed streams in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill. Respectfully submitted, GG~- Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ry-7 Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x __ c:\wp51\agenda\dixie\salem.aln cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney RPR-22-1993 11:41 FROM T.P. Parker & Son TO 7722030 P.02 PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TAX N0. 63.00-01-14 D.B. 799, PG. 31 (DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL) ~ 6RgNCy 00 N c 1~~ 2 00 ~ ~O. ~p N W U;~ r~ R. C. B. S. PROPERTY 'A\ 6'~ m~ 9y _ _ O O' J ,= h moo` ^O ~ O~ rye. 2 1 CENTERLINE OF NEW 80' ACCESS EASEMENT FROM POINT A,B,C TO D PROPERTY OF SALEM STONE CORP. TAX N0. 63.00-01-13 D.B. 1312, PG. 442 o~x ~ ~ ~ O ' ~O + O ~° o~ 00 'p NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. SEE PLAT FOR SALEM STONE CORPORATION BY LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. DATED DECEM8ER 11, 1992 AND RECORDED IN P.B. 15, PG. 10. 3. METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, CALCULATED INFORMATION AND FIELD TIES TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO LOCATE THE POSITION OF THE EASEMENT IN RELATION TO THE BOUNDARIES. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. SURVEY FOR COUNTY OF ROANOKE SHOWING A NEW 80' ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF SALEM STONE CORPORATION ,~ ~ o ?a ~' ~ o SALEM STONE PROPERTY INSET NOT TO SCALE a~ ~} ¢N z~ c~ a o: 50 ~` O O~ Q U oz wa ,zx of 1 _./1 No. 1335 22 Ai°rtx.'93 fe= PROPERTY LINE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA TAX N0. 83.00-01-13 SO' T. P. PARKER do SON SCALE: 1 "_ N,g, O.C.L.F. DRAWN OAP TPP&5 818 8oul~ard DATE: APRIL 22J 1993 EN OINlCEIR3 CALC. oAP CHK'D SIJRVEYOR3 J?cr! ~~ Hox s9 D- 41977 CLOSED: PLANNEI@S 3s1ea1, Yil'eiaia 261b3 W,O,• 93-0315 0 N~~ Ti ~T111 O fa'7 n-~ THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this day of , 19 , by and between SALEM STONE CORPORATION. Grantor, and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Grantee. WITNESSETH That for and inconsideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors do hereby GRANT and CONVEY with General Warranty and Modern English Covenants of Title unto the Grantee, its employees, agents, consultants, contractors and other authorized and designated representatives and unto the United States Environmental Protection Agency and its designated representatives, the following described easement, to-wit: A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, to construct, install, operate, inspect, use, maintain, and repair or replace certain improvements, and a perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT for access to and from several unamed streams flowing from the Grantee's Dixie Caverns Landfill site to the Roanoke River and related improvements, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantors, acquired by deed ,and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book ,page ,and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.00-1-13. The location of said easement is shown and designated as "CENTERLINE OF AREA REQUIRED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REMOVAL WORK' upon the attached plat, marked Schedule A, said plat being by reference incorporated herein. The Grantee agrees to restore and repair any actual damage to Grantors' property which may be directly caused by the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of said project except as hereinafter provided. The Grantors agree that the Grantee will not be expected to restore the property to the identical original condition, but rather as near thereto as is practicable, and that the Grantor will cooperate with the Grantee in effectuating such restoration. N-7 It is expressly agreed between the parties hereto that the Grantee and its agents shall have the right to inspect the easement and to cut, clear, and remove all undergrowth, obstructions, or improvements lying within, upon, or adjacent to the easement, that in any way endanger or interfere with the proper use of the same. The Grantors covenant that no building, structure, pavement or sidewalks, fence, trees and shrubbery, or other improvements of any kind whatsoever, shall be erected upon or within the easement herein granted or placed in such location as to render the easement inaccessible. In the event that this covenant is violated, the Grantee shall not be obligated to repair, replace, or otherwise be responsible for such improvements if damaged or removed. The Grantors acknowledge that the plans for the aforesaid project as they affect the property have been fully explained to them or their authorized representative. The fixtures, facilities, lines, utilities, and any other improvements placed upon, under, or across the property by the Grantee shall remain the property of the Grantee. The easement herein granted is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any easement or right-of--way now in existence or which may be acquired in the future. The Grantors covenant and agree for themselves, their heirs, successors, and assigns that the consideration aforementioned and the covenants herein shall be in lieu of any and all claims to compensation and damages by reason of the location, construction, operation, maintenance, or reconstruction of the environmental removal work within the easement herein granted. To have and to hold unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. 2 n-~ Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, .hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, of the real estate conveyed herein pursuant to Ordinance No. 19 adopted by said Board of Supervisors on the day of WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Approved as to form: Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney SALEM STONE CORPORATION .~1 t `` ~% ~ `-~~ "~~ (SEAL L. D. HILL, President BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of Virginia, County/City of G/dy~~ , to-wit: (sEAL) ~~he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ 3 i~,/' day of 1'-~~1~~~~ 19~ 1~, by L. D. Hill, President, on behalf of Salem Stone Corporation. ~~~~~~~ Notary Public My commission expires: 6/~/3 5~ 3 State of Virginia, County/City of Roanoke, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. My commission expires: N-7 day of on behalf of Notary Public 4 ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF S COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COU MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION SALEM STONE CORPORATI~ CLEANUP OF THE DIXIE C~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ACTION A-42793-9.f NO. /y- 7 _ .VISORS OF ROANOKE ADMINISTRATION CENTER AN ACCESS EASEMENT FROM IN CONNECTION WITH THE NS LANDFILL SITE This consent agenda it m involves the donation of the following easement from Salem tone Corporation (Tax Map No. 63.00- 1-13) to the Board of Superv'sors of Roanoke County in connection with the cleanup of the Dixi Caverns Landfill site in the Catawba Magisterial District: a) a parcel of lan shown and designated as "CENTERLINE OF AREA REQUIRED F R ENVIRONMENTAL REMOVAL WORK" on a plat, dated prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering epartment, a copy of which is attached hereto. County staff ~ s inspected and approved the location and dimensions of the ea~ement for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required for these acquisitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this easement for access to several unnamed streams in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~, '/ G ~~f~ ~~ ;fit ~ Y ~~\1~.~,,'~-^ti.,_.:.. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~~ N-7 Action Approved (~ Motion by Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to c:\wp57 \agenda\dixie\salem.stn Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohin x Nick s x Mi ix x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & spections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Q-I COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE % of General Amount Fund Expenditures Beginning Balance at $5,419,414 7.51% July 1, 1992 (Audited) August 12, 1992 Dixie Caverns (100,000) Sept. 8, 1992 Cable TV budget (21,149) October 13, 1992 Bloodborne Pathogens Standards (33,800) October 27, 1992 Computer Upgrade (126,281) December 1, 1992 Hepatitis BVaccine - Volunteers (36,840) January 12, 1993 Hollins Rescue Squad (15,285) January 26, 1993 Rutrough Road Improvements 350 000 Balance as of April 27, 1993 $4,736,059 6.56% Reserve Amounts November 17, 1992 Reserved for employee benefits (606,182) November 17, 1992 Reserved for building 350 000 $3,779,877 5.24% Submitted By ~.~ ~ . 1~,~c,~cc `~' Diane D. Hyatt i/ Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund expenditures ($72,151,291). 4-a COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 (Audited) Addition to Capital Reserve from original 1992-1993 budget July 14, 1992 Lighting of Green Hill Park Ball Fields October 13, 1992 Repair ladder truck at Cave Spring Fire Station Balance as of April 27, 1993 Submitted by $ 24,705 114,760 (15,000) 19 001 105 464 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance C~. 3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1992 July 14, 1992 Information Program for Bond Referendum July 28, 1992 Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy August 12, 1992 Outside Legal Assistance September 8, 1992 Grumman Litigation September 22, 1992 Grumman Litigation October 13, 1992 Space Study October 27, 1992 Grumman Litigation December 1, 1992 Grumman Litigation December 15, 1992 Grumman Litigation February 9, 1993 Incentive Fund to Cleanup Illegal Dumps Balance as of April 27, 1993 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ 50,000 (18,250) (2,000) (10,000) (229) (869) (5~~) (941) (289) (844) 10 000 $- F ACTION # ITEM NUMBER C~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -March 1993 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $1,999,660.08 Payroll: 3/12/93 $ 480,724.00 3/26/93 466,705.81 947.429.81 $2,947,089.89 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~~Q-~~ ~ . ~_~a.-y ~ Diane D. Hyatt ~- Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Q-`/ ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ Johnson _ _ Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B). FISCAL IMPACT• None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Appro d b ~~ ~ ~ , ~ ~. ohn M. Chambliss, Jr Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A April 27, 1993 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Q-5 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY An interdepartmental team of nine staff members met on March 8, 1993, and reviewed A&E proposals and ratings, and developed a short list of four firms for informal interviews. Team members created a thorough list of substantive questions for the interviews. Interviews were conducted on March 18, 1993. Due to the high quality of the proposals and the strong presentations made by the firms, the team was compelled to conduct an extended review to assess and weigh the competing positive merits associated with each proposal. The team was able to reach a consensus on rankings, and negotiations were initiated with the first-ranked offeror. On March 30, 1993, following a negotiation session which was expertly conducted by the Procurement Department, a contract was signed with Jones & Jones Associates. The terms of the contract are very favorable to the County. PARKS AND RECREATION Starkey Park -One baseball field has been constructed. The realignment of one soccer field into two soccer fields and correction of drainage problems have been submitted to County Engineering for approval for construction during the Spring of 1993. ROADS Incidental construction projects may take longer if right-of-way is not donated. VALLEY TECHPARK The contract to conduct preliminary engineering and road design was awarded to T.P. Parker and Sons on March 4, 1993. Plans are due on April 4, 1993. Detailed engineering is underway as of March 4, 1993. Because of budget considerations, the project has experienced some delays. The environmental and archaelogical surveys have been completed. FIRE HYDRANTS To date all hydrant locations have been identified, the site maps are complete and meetings have been held with the cities of Roanoke and Salem. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,500,000 S 2,500.00 PROJECT COORDINATOR: SPENCER WATTS ACCOUNT CODE: 104030 q-s TASK ~ A & E PROPOSALS ~~ PLANNED I BIDS II PLANNED 1 9 9 3 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: An interdepartmental team of nine staff members met on March 8, 1993, to review A & E proposals and ratings, and developed a short list of four firms for informal interviews. Interviews were conducted on March 18. The team was able to reach a consensus on rankings, and negotiations were initiated with the first-ranked offeror. On March 30, 1993, a contract was signed with Jones & Jones Associates. The terms of the contract are very favorable to the County. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE 3 2,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104040 (~ -5 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC RFP ENGINEERING PLANNED SERVICES ACTUAL SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE PLANNED FOR BIDS ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED COMPLETION ACTUAL PROJECT PLANNED CLOSEOUT ACTUAL T07AL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: z BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 90,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 C,~ -5 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SELECT SURVEYING PLANNED FIRM ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING (FIELD) ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED ACTUAL ............. ............ DESIGN PLANNED ............. ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED ............. ............ ............ ............. CITIZENS ACTUAL ID, PRE-BID LANNED ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ CONFERENCE ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No easements needed. 2. Coordinate with VDOT (95~ Project in VDOT RW) 3 ~~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 75,000 S 97,500 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SELECT PLANNED SURVEYING FIRM ACTUAL ............ PRE. ENGINEERING (FIELD) PLANNED ............. ............ PHASE I & II (AERIAL) ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED PHASE II ONLY ACTUAL DESIGN PHASE I & PLANNED >:.:::. II ACTUAL MEET WITH VDOT/ PLANNED CITIZENS PHASE I ACTUAL MEET W/CITIZENS- PHASE II A PLANNED :»>: WARD CONTRACT - PHASE I CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. Phase I Murray Run below F & W Bldg. F (Upstream from Phase II) 3. Phase II Trunk line along Colony Ln. & drainage easement 4. Discuss curb & gutter option w/VDOT along portion of Colony Ln. 5. Phase I - 57,500 from F & W & 515, 000 from Drainage Budget; Phase II - 575,000 from Bond 6. P-120 to be constructed with Phase II 4 ~~ 5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -NOTTINGHAM HILLS AREA BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 45,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING (FIELD) ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL HOURLY PLANNED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed 2. To be in conjunction with P-103 3. Projects are in three (3) locations - Cave Spring Ln., Cynthia Dr., & Farmington Dr. 5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 q-s STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 300,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC APPLY FOR FEMA PLANNED GRANT OF MATCHING FUNDS ACTUAL RFP ENGINEERING PLANNED SERVICES ACTUAL SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED WATERSHED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL POLICY PLANNED ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJECT PLANNE INVESTIGATION ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJECT PLANNEI CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNEI acruaL The County is seeking matching monies from FEMA to conduct the Master Plan for the Stormwater Management Study which should reduce the County share by approximately 5150,000. These savings can then be directed towards other corrective work to benefit our community. b BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 (~_,5 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHANBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104209, 104201, 104203 104204 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC WALROND PARK PLANNED 31 000 &NG~> .>h>+EG::>: :<.;F} '.; ID >; a, CON:< GQIi :;?:eQN!?? SOCCER F I ELD : ACTUAL WA LROND PARK P LAN NED 2 00 0 ;E6> ~ NO.. B D ::::<: CON :::>:::::: EON GON i 2 BASEBALL .. , .::, . FIELDS ACTUAL NO RTHS IDE A L NNE D 2 0 00 ::»:; G.,, I1::: N :;CON ;EC1N;.;: REALIGN FIELDS . . ... ACTUAL `<1)sl~>> ":hklG>>` ;>~~l~ BO NSA CK PA RK P LANNE D 0 000 , ' G I~,:, i~.:: . ON .Cr~N N BALL FIELD . . .;: :.;:. ACTUAL '~'ENG ':'~1~G> <E#EG: BON SACK PAR K LAN NED 5 0 00 < G... .E~tG... .B.iI);.. :>::»::>::>::>:: C4N:<: :>::>::>::;::::: :>>CON::: ::>::>:«:>::> ::~SE::: PICNIC SHELTER ACTUAL BON SAC K PAR K L ANNED 0 000 G<[ B TDz€` N:::: >?GpH€> ISE> PLAYGROUND EQUIPT. ACTUAL VINYARD PARK I PLANN ED 62 000 `>~NG'` :::E1+FG°:>. :>BID> GON Ct~N: CON ;: 2 BASEBALL ... FIELDS ACTUAL VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150,000 ENO:.:: ; E?s€G,:: BIiX COli CON> tJSE i' LIGHT SOCCER ,..:.: >::; . ;: .......... FIELDS ACTUAL >EltG::> TOTAL PLANNED 402 000 ACTUAL COMMENTS: Northside - Engineering services contract issued to Lumsden Associates, P.C., to design the realignment of the two baseball fields and one soccer field being displaced by the construction of the new Forensics Lab by the State. The engineering will include the site design, drainage issues, and master planning of the site for future consideration of such items as utilities for restrooms, parking, lighting, etc. Construction should occur in the Spring of 1993. Bonsack Park - County and School officials have met with Engineering consultants to review the site and begin determining which part of the tract will be suitable for the development of the park facilities. Construction should begin in the Spring of 1993. 7 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 (~-5 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104204, 104210, 104212 104205, 104207 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25.000 _~.............,,,.... COMMENTS: Lighting -Bids will be taken in April, 1993, for lighting projects at Vinyard Park, Byrd field, Starkey Park and the Career Center Lighting projects. Construction should occur as noted on the table. 8 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 C~-5 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104207, 104211, 104206, 104213, 104202 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC WHISPERING PINES PARK LIGH PLANNED 60,000 ............ ~~~ ............. EN~: T BALL FIELD ACTUAL WH ISPER ING P INES A P LANN ED 5 000 .. . ENG... .H IO... .......... ::::GOtJ:;:;: ........... ;:;>:G011::: .:::::::.: :: CON>': RK RESTROOM UTILITIES ACTUAL WHISPERING PINES PLANNE D 36 000 `'ENG`:': ::EiiG> z>»:::.`'`"': :..9.iA... >:>> >COH_ ::CC7N.. CON>?f :;: ... ^:.~1~E?:: PARK TENNIS/ BASKETBALL COURT ACTUAL GREEN HILL PARK 2 PICNIC PLANNED 30 000 SHELTERS ACTUAL GA RST M ILL P ARK IGHT 2 P LANN ED 4 000 G..:, ~It3>,: ON:::: :;CAN.?:>; iSt;>: BALL FIELDS ACTUAL WINDSOR HILL ARE PLANNED 50 000 j:j`g`~,'`,'',' A PURCHASE LAND ACTUAL WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62 000 '' '!;E1sEfs;>;: :;EN~::_> ' 38'Ii1:> AREA 2 BALL FIELDS ACTUAL STAR KEY PARK BAS P LANN ED 2 000 Q.... DON... .G[1N::. .pSE.::.. t1~E::: EBALL FIELDS ACTUAL ~'~~NG ? CkG``'~`f Coll TOTAL PLANNED 449.000 ACTUAL COMMENTS: Starkey Park - Engineering services contract issued to Balzer and Associates, Inc., to design two baseball fields and correct a drainage concern near the existing baseball field at this site. One baseball field has been constructed. The realignment of one soccer field into two soccer fields and correction of drainage problems have been submitted to County Engineering for approval for construction during the Spring of 1993. 9 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 ~.5 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CNAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104202, 104214, 104218, 104220, 104219 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC STARKEY PARK PLANNED 31 000 ~~ ~~~ g~' 1 BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL STA RKEY PAR K LA NNED 2 0 00 .::. G .,:EI~ .:: :BTD.:: :::GLiN:> QN:: 13SE :> LIGHT 1 FIELD . .. . . ACTUAL STARKEY PARK PLANNED 25 000 RESTROOM UTILITIES ACTUAL TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210,400 >~~FEG>:; >Bt?<# s;~p~i;;;f; ;:>`eOH> RENOVATIONS ACTUAL "~~~~~;: BAL L FIE LD LAN NED 2 000 '~NG'' ., ::;::;..:;,. BIIx:;: ...,..;.:. :IiOH.:. :.„:::"..:: ::.GON::. G ':BID'' FENCING ACTUAL 3zt<~EG ;;;EN'Ci FAC IL ITY R EPA IRS P LANN ED 4 00 0 EI+IG' E G U ; O61 N CRAIG AVENUE ... .. ... ... :.. : : .::. :::. ;:: ACTUAL FA CI IITY REP AIR S LAN NED 1 000 IG D N:'< N :; LEISURE ARTS .: . ACTUAL FAC ILIT Y R EPA IRS P LANN ED 4 00 ?~G G ` ~ ii3 C O N;: ; ; GbN WALROND OFFICE - _ . .. . ;;; BLDG. ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED GG/ OM COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations - The County~s consultant has reviewed the tennis courts used by the four High Schools of the County to determine the degree of repairs that will required and will help to evaluate the remaining courts in future phases. Repairs will occur during the Summer of 1993 after use by the school teams. Ball Field Fencing - Technical specifications have been prepared and the inventory of fencing needs has been established. Bids will be taken in April to repair fences and to establish the fencing cost for new ball fields. 10 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JONN CHAMBLISS q_5 ACCOUNT CODE: 104221, 104216, 104217, 104208 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ADA ACC ESS PLAN NED 10 COMMENTS: 11 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 ROAD PROJECTS C'~_ 5 BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 500,000 S 500,000.00 S 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: ARNOLD COVET ACCOUNT CODE: 104070 TASK 1 9 9 3 BUDGET JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC B of S APPROPR PLANNED IATE FUNDS ACTUAL VDOT PREPARES BIDS PLANNED ACTUAL VDOT ADVERTISES PLANNED ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS CONTRACT PLANNED ON ALL PROJECTS (57) ACTUAL ALL PROJECTS CONSTRUC PLANNED TED AND COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED COMMENTS: *5500,000 check (County) submitted to VDOT on January 29, 1993. Plant mix projects (paving) bid month of Aprit. Incidental construction projects bid month of May. Incidental construction projects may take longer if right-of-way is not donated. 12 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B April 27, 1993 q_s VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET $ 750,000 CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE PROJECT COORDINATOR: TIM GUBALA COMMENTS: ACCOUNT CODE: (a•) Rezoning to remove the 200' buffer is not required due to the County Zoning Ordinance adoption on 12/31/92. (b•) On January 12, 1993, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to seek Industrial Access Funds from VDOT using the bond allocation as front money. 41hen qualifying tenants have located in the Park, the monies may be reimbursed to the County and returned to the project to further development efforts to enhance the site's marketability. Contract to conduct preliminary engineering and road design was awarded to T.P. Parker & Sons on March 4, 1993. Plans are due April 4, 1993. (c-) Detailed engineering underway effective March 4, 1993. Because of budget considerations, the project has experienced some delays. The environmental and archaelogical surveys have been completed. 13 .. .~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: April Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir is now in its seventeenth month and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last month included: ° Continued dental concrete of foundation ° Continued RCC dam construction - started March 24th ° Constructed gallery and adit ° Continued quarry and crushing operation ° Continued concrete and piping placement for river pump station. The current project contract total costs including existing and pending change orders is $25, 044, 000 and remains unchanged from the previous report. This is an increase of $175,000 over the previous estimate and is due to an increase in the amount of dental concrete and RCC required to fill excavated areas along the foundation. Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $13,378,260.85 and $1,079,270.12 for engineering construction phase services. During the next month, the contractor will perform the following: ° Continue construction of RCC Dam ° Continue quarry and crushing operation ° Continue pump station piping and concrete placement. WATER TREATMENT PLANT The Water Treatment Plant continues in the design phase. Since the zoning of the treatment plant site changed, the use for major public utilities is a use by right and a, special use permit will not be required. The pilot water treatment plant at the Glenvar site was shut down April 8, 1993 when the Department of Environmental Quality notified us that we could not discharge the treated water to the river without a waste disposal permit. Due to the time required to obtain a permit, the pilot will discharge to our sewer line for the balance of the testing that may be required. Due to the great quantity of data gathered over the last seven months, the Health Department may determine that additional pilot data is not required. During the next month, staff will perform the following: ° Send Preliminary Engineering Report for Treatment Plant to State Health Department. ° Send the Roanoke River Sanitary Survey to State Health Department. ° Review Pilot Treatment Plant Data with State Health Department. ° Continue design of Treatment Plant appurtenances. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work continues on the Water Transmission Line: ° Title certification ° Easement negotiation ° Obtaining easements ° Preparation of construction drawings ° Obtaining stream crossing permits Easement acquisition continues. Where staff cannot negotiate a settlement with a land owner using an independent appraisal, we will bring the matter to the Board for guidance prior to requesting acquisition by eminent domain. Work will continue on acquisition of easements during the next month. SUBMITTED BY: Clifford aig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. odge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Minnix Johnson Kohinke Eddy Nickens ACTION #. ITEM NUMBER -- AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The month of March has again produced abnormal weather conditions that have affected progress. However, the first weeks of April have produced substantial progress. The months of April and May will begin additional construction contracts for utility and landfill liner work. The delivery of the pre-engineered building for the transfer station is scheduled for April 21 and the rotary dumper for the week of May 10. Progress is visible at both the transfer station and Smith Gap. A tour is available at your convenience. Attached is a Project Update presented to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority at it's regular meeting held April 15, 1993. Respectfully submitte ~~~ John R. Hubbard Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) to Motion by: -------------------------------- No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ... .r{;.fF.:... •:. ~:.~ •: ••:. y2.::..: :• }.:~: :•:;.`, tii"i ' i": .y .: a. ;1. 4{%2x . vy .:.:2 :~f,,,.~{ }. ..$ wr •$i:W2}l+i/F i i 1 •i ~~~:` r•?}}ti '':?{~~"y"~" 4i:}~ ~. iJ{~' 2•tC• ~ • { 2. : :. }:: ., ate' :: ., :.: f: ?• ~ ' M1.};: v. ~.: • ` :{ ~ }}: v r ...... v::::: v; • •: w: •: v: v:. ~:::. v. : • :.::;. ••.v .. x•}:.......v. .i~•:: ...2• . ....... 2:'{• :w. ...::.. ::.r?.; :;. ,'• .r} :`•i «i:4' 1 `:.`\'v, 4/,. .tic{~2tiZ;'kY.`r~vM1 ~h . •3~ ':~ ,~•' :::.. ._ . ::. :. .. vin :x:.; : ~(~yT~ [(.' M1ati. '{a \~::::2.`C•:i/b•{. .i .rriiC{c ..~ai ~! •: " +c}+C..: .2. , ~Nr. {.~~;4\ ;{\ • {: .i :~; .!'yt::3~'`~(j{•: ... .}: r 'nll.i:~\ vJT\~~Rh f./ ~ .i:}:^fv~~v0•$t:.•. : n/1;i,S ~. }::¢ e..'•\~ :L\\'JQ, n \O. `r::'~.:~T',•.,.•.}.:• '}}v:?SY~~f l,. v ..................•i.4?::::::::}?}};a}?;a}???}};•:A:}:•:•:?}}}:•}}}}??}}}????}}:'i.1:v%a: }..\..\\\•. U. r:.. : :?ki•4:v.......... n.:~:•}:a\h\; };n..; ;}.\. a\};hlv:} •7•vvv.fia}~}: ti\\ :v \~a.\v f{~}•}}~i• ::... ....... v........ .. ;• . tai }f' fr ~S:';£lY~C7r'r,!(G~',r:~"~,~'f{': •t:'+~.• X0,2 M~ \,t • 4 fi!.C '::.'•;S's.: i:7 f $ C...~~.:}. \C7:}'P+`{2..,~ \ C}, ~{,\~~v}...:~ r ~..{,va„ , ~ ..{ it ~.,yo-r`~•'.'.~. ..t2:r..a•,iY:'r'i;<+{ri..y.::ti:.?:•. •.... {. v}.'•'~"'+i::•{•\','?S•.yn: \. .•4v : l . ..et:•.'.. u. ;: • r i. ••.•{•:.l •::::.};y;. '.•:•:;{ •ai • .:ia.. .. a'.•ti 'I) a. «•, yx,.;a3',X~ ' <aa' /F E : x { t,~: { ....; •: ,it;{;{:~:::tx .f.:. •:. .:::.s.t:~{r.'::..' ::::,{{...~',c,`y:: v}:.}:a}'~~\\ya, }. •.~;k .. ?:}?:•,.•::k.:~.<:k~:: {.::: 5:::::5. }}.....5:~ fo \?w. }:v: }.; ..f.... ..fvf: MEETING: April 15, 1993 PROJECT: Master Schedule STATUS: The month of March again brought poor weather conditions that have affected work progress. Below is a brief description of the progress on each portion of the work. mi h . Part B Approval: Department of Waste Management has begun to draft the permit. . Rough Grading: Approximately 669b has been completed. Work continues to be critical in getting areas ready for liner and utilities construction. . Tipper Station: Foundation work is approximately 57% complete. Utility work has continued. . Monitoring Wells: Sampling did not occur in March due to poor weather. Sampling is expected to begin the week of April 12. . Landfill Liner: Construction bids are due on April 14. . Utilities: Construction bids are due on April 14. Transfer Station . Building: Concrete work is progressing with foundation and floor slabs. The Scale House is visible. The main building structure is to begin Apri121. Rail Transportation: . Rail Spur: Grading continues and track construction has started on the first two (2) miles. ~~ .Rail Cars: Cars have been ordered and delivery expected by August. . Car Dumpers: i m n~. . Heavy Machinery: Dumper delivery and construction has been delayed due to weather until May -June. Bulldozer bids have been received by the Landfill Board with action due on April 14. Rail car movers to be bid in May. Schedule: Poor weather continues to delay work and will affect completion. No definite completion date can be anticipated at this time. Attached is a summary of the project schedule and status. Respectfully submitted: John R. Hubbard, P.E. Chief Executive Officer PROJECT 8TATU8 ROAHO?KE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORRY MASTER SCHEDULE SCHEDULE 1992 1993 % J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C 0 E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C 1 E Y U T 0 E E U R C 1 E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R II LANDFlLL Part B Approve ~•..::: ~' • ~~;~:;.: ~'?i`i: ~: ~«~~>~: Rou h Gradin 9 9 66 Monitoring Wells 100 Bwl i do 9 v.~. ~:•w.... .. . 6 Liners '~•>~:~•~• •< 0 Utilities ::ss::s: e~s:::> >>:>: :~•,••~~~ :::::: =~ ::::. ;.;::.: :£_:::: 0 TRANSFER STATION Part A Approval C O M P L E T E 100 Part B Submittal C O M P L E T E 100 Part B Approval 100 Site Clearing 100 9 t< > >':~ ..k.. RAIL TRANSPORT ei pur ;<a?'~ iN'Li?':, ~ ''~.<:~ .!kt ?:T;?'~ 3l.:: ~?;:y:::;i .,>.;:;{.i'r' 'mac ~4..n ~~.`',•.'v'. ;a?a: <^'' 70 Rail Cars ``)C4ti• '~'~4+•'~ ::v~4'~k^ ~=3: :`:~~`' 10 Car Dum ar .~i< :~~~ ~•• :••<.z:;>:' ~•i BOND PROCEEDS ONLY FINANCUIL STATUS COMPONENT ESTIMATED COSTS ACTUAL TO DATE % TOTAL Landfill 813,083, 204 81,720,741 11 % Transfer 5, 260,614 81,051,398 13% Transportation 9000,000 -0- 0% TOTAL 827,343,818 $ 2,772,139 10% /9 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Monitoring Manhole Requirements in Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the April 13 meeting, a local developer questioned the requirement to install special manholes to monitor waste into the sewer lines. The Board of Supervisors requested staff to contact the City of Roanoke and other surrounding localities to ascertain how this code requirement is being interpreted. Utility Director Clifford Craig is in the process of gathering the requested information and will have it available at the Board meeting on April 27. ~ ~rny./ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~, AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 42793-10 OF APPRECIATION TO VOLUNTEERS FOR OVER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED BERVICE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to the volunteers who provide fire and rescue service during evening and weekend hours to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, these men and women dedicate countless hours, unpaid but appreciated, to ensure the safety of the people and property of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of family and business life, few volunteers are able to maintain this type of commitment over a long period of time, as demands on their time and energy increase; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County wishes to recognize those people who have been able to continue in service to the citizens of the County, and has established a Quarter Century Club for the volunteers who have served for over 25 years; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on the behalf on the citizens of the County, does hereby express its deepest appreciation to these dedicated citizens for over twenty-five years of service as a volunteer with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that they are hereby certified as a member of the Quarter Century Club for Volunteers in Roanoke County. j On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue r .. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Appreciation and Recognition of Volunteers with Over 25 Years of Service to Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ l SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several years ago, Roanoke County established a "Quarter Century Club" for employees with over 25 years of employment with the County. These employees are recognized at a Board of Supervisors meeting where they receive a plaque honoring their service. The County is now establishing a similar organization for volunteers who have devoted over 25 years of service to the citizens of Roanoke County. Each volunteer will receive a plaque and resolution honoring their efforts. listed below are the names of those volunteers who have over 25 years of service, and who will be honored at this time. Thomas E. Wagner Fire Department Volunteer - 38 years Bobby L. Scruggs Fire Department Volunteer - 38 years Earnest N. Amos Fire Department Volunteer - 37 Years Leon Martin Fire Department Volunteer - 32 Years Donald R. Thomas Fire Department Volunteer - 31 Years Lowell Aldridge Rescue Squad Volunteer - 30 Years Winston B. Adams f Fire Department Volunteer - 28 Years Benny L. Powell Fire Department Volunteer - 28 years Guy C. Stump Fire Department Volunteer - 27 Years Douglas K. Wirt Rescue Squad Volunteer - 27 Years Ronald S. Edwards Fire Department Volunteer - 26 Years Willis Buchanan Fire and Rescue Volunteer - 25 Years Roy M. Crowe Fire Department Volunteer - 25 Years Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens .. R AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION OF APPRECIATION TO VOLUNTEERS FOR OVER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to the volunteers who provide fire and rescue service during evening and weekend hours to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, these men and women dedicate countless hours, unpaid but appreciated, to ensure the safety of the people and property of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of family and business life, few volunteers are able to maintain this type of commitment over a long period of time, as demands on their time and energy increase; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County wishes to recognize those people who have been able to continue in service to the citizens of the County, and has established a Quarter Century Club for the volunteers who have served for over 25 years; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on the behalf on the citizens of the County, does hereby express its deepest appreciation to these dedicated citizens for over twenty-five years of service as a volunteer with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that they are hereby certified as a member of the Quarter Century Club for Volunteers in Roanoke County. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session with Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board. The Board will present their priority requests for funding in the 1993-94 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~y~ ~ Elmer C. odge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Ullllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllilillllllllllilllllll~~ff Iliffllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllillllllllllllllllllillllllll~ ~ - _ _ - ~!, o--d-~-- -~ a~T - _ ~, _ _ _ D ~'"O AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ c d _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPEA-.RANCE REQUEST _ _ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ ,4~ '~, SUBJECT: - ~ r.~',1,~°~ t,.._ ; ~. ~~~,~ ~ ~t~.~~-~.~>r .> c = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ - _ _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ N - 0 ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - -, _ _ NAME <. -_ ADDRESS , -~ ~ ~~ ~:~~- l' f~~`'%~%~ ~ - ;,~ ', ; ~ ~. ,% f _, __ _ 1 = PHONE /1i~.S ' 3i~~- ~~~...1~ - millllliliilllllllllilillllllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllliiiliillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll11~1 .e. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF TH8 BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 42793-11 CERTIFYING E%ECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yrza,,~,~~`. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ACTION NO. ' ` ITEM NUMBER V '' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing to Elicit Citizen Comment on the Proposed Annual Budget for FY 1993-94. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to receive written and oral comments from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for FY 1993-94. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ ~~` RoAN~~F County of Roanoke ~, >~ ; FY 1993-94 Budget Public Hearing Z ~ ~~ April 27, 1993 ~ a 1838 Budget Priorities Established by the Board of Suuervisors • Balance the budget within existing No increase in health care cost to tax rates. County and School employees. • Maintain all service levels. Provide a salary increase to all • Increase the contribution to tourism. County and School employees. • Continue or improve our support of regional programs. Taz Rates Adopted Adopted 1992 1993 Real Estate $ 1.13 $ 1.13 Personal Property $ 3.50 $ 3.50 Machinery and Tools S 3.00 $ 3.00 Proposed General Government Revenues Budget Proposed Increase FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94 (Decrease Local Revenue Sources: Real Estate Tax S 33,850,000 S 35,100,000 S 1,250,000 Public Svc. Corp. Tax 1,550,000 1,625,000 75,000 Personal Property Tax 12,800,000 12,500,000 (300,000) Sales Tax 4,300,000 4,600,000 300,000 Utility Consumer Tax 3,300,000 3,450,000 150,000 Business LICP.IICP T„r ^ -"" --- .~aqa~ l~q~ io3 ;uam;sn[pe iatj a pue saa~olduxa ~C;unoD io3 ~CaAins ~(ieles a 30 8u?pun; odoid a 8uegaun u?euxai 11[M sajel aauelnsu? gtleaq .C;uno~ •uin?maid aaaeinsu? gjleaq ,~jgjuoui sapnlain ja8pnq Pas qi. Ta ~ aM •saa~(o duia oo ue ~CjunoD gloq jo3 luatutsnfpe nagj u? uocjanpai SZS a aA?aaai iitM saa~(olduia loogas 1i sd i i qaS P Su?A?l;o jsoa go£ a Sutp?void of Palnq?rlje sl?~auaq aa~(olduia u? aseaiau? leluauiaiau? aq~ sapnlau? tio8alea s?q,I, :.aaglp •,Ca1iEA axoueog aqj u? uoiun jslt3 ~(q paptnoid Smaq sgof Mau aql m paaeld aq of aie oqM lauuostad 3o Sutu?ert aqj io3 Su?pun; pue neaing sioj?s?A pue uo?juanuoD aqj `dcgsiaujied juauidolanaQ atuiouo~ aql io; 8u?punt leuo?jtppe of anp pasea~ut seq ~o8ajea uoriertstu?uzpd leiauaD aqZ :aopeitslalwpd IstaaaD •Saa3 IIOijeplO~al u[ a'Ji~30 s<qj /tq pajeiaua8 sariuaAai aqj ui aseai~u? ue ~Cq 1aS33o aq i1?M qa?qM aseai~u[ ja8pnq Su?jeiado ~ io; paau aq; ui 8u~;jnsai peo~ioM siq ui q>MOiB snouuoua Sulauauadxa s? y[noD 1?nar?~ aqi 30 Mo~iano a e ai ie[ a u? sasuadxa Su?jeiado pasea~ut aqt ianoa of papnlau? xja~ aqt ,(Reu?3 •suon?pupa pap qt of P~ i [.. ~ a ° auuostad Sunstxa io3 siuaauoa seM Su?pan3 `liaM sd 'suo?jtsod Mau aaigj lo; 8u?pun; sapnlam ;a8png ~-£66i x.3 ql uio Sut u saribai ~(junoD r(;a3es;o asneaaq jnq `pa?uap seM jsanbai aq,I, •siaat;;o IEUO-jaauoa leuo?j?ppe io; ale3S ql ~ P ~ ~gao n sa a~oueog `suor;tpuoa !?ef papmoiaiano of anQ '£OS`6££$ aseaiau[ °'; pasodotd st tio8ajea s?qs :saaagl0 l !; I!; °~ •suorjejs aig ~juno~ !!e Io3 _ _ ,, _ _ .____c_ __~.,.-~ ........,.... •+T.r .,.rv c,iirrnu ~m Ini n~ra au0 `sa'JIIEiriAU1e ~iilll~~l,4l~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllillllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI~ ~~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. I~~ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: `~ ~~ ~-- t _. c c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c c - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ . ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vv~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c NAME ~ ~/' i,e Sh i n c~l~.. / / ADDRESS -3 ~ a 3 ~ ~h w©od 1.~r~e,. 'L'~°-Q ~ L/~ O~ f~C~ m e~n 11a ~-eI'~5 mlllllllllllllllllillllllliilllilllllillllilllllllllllllllllillllllillllilllllilillllilllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllllllm ~Illllillllllilllllllllilllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllil 111111111111~1U - ~: _ - _ - - - _ - _ - _ -_ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. V - / - - - - - - __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ = CE CITIZENS COMMENTS = X PUBLIC HEARING ORDINAN - - - _ - - ~3~ e~ - - SUBJECT. 9 _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: __ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - _-. - do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ - - T LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - PLEASE PRIN - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - ._ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ - - NAME cZ.,-- t z s t - _ - _ - _ - __ ~~ ~~ , - _ ~~~ - _ ~ _ - ADDRESS t e~ , ~~ So ` ~~~- o n - - - - - - - - Goa /~' Ce~t~ i~ the. Sg~ar _ - PHONE - mlllllllllllllllllllilllllilllllllliillllilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllm ~Illllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllillllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111~1111111111111) _ ,~ - _ - _ : ~ _ _ - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. V~^ / __ APPE CE REQUEST _ __ ~C PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ = SUBJECT: ,C3 LtQ~Gy ~°.,.~" ~-- _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ c - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c -_ with the clerk. -_ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF F O AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = i ~_ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ mllillllllllilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllillliililllllllllilllllillillllllilillllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllillllm I am Elizabeth Johnson. This~s--~ ~,~represent the Athenian Society, a volunteer organization whose object is the furthering of the arts and sciences in the Roanoke Valley. Our Society was formed 13 years ago. We have given volunteer support to many arts and science organizations here and 10 years ago started our '~~~i;il~~J~ Ck'0~ 1 L, y~.~ association with Center in the Square. We(~organized hosted the opening party December 6, 1983 at Center given for the construction workers of Center, the merchants and the farmers of the market area. We spent 6 months of our volunteer time preparing the party for the 1200 guests. Since then we have volunteered at Center in 3 ways. We staff the information desk in the Atrium 6 days a week greeting visitors We conduct group tours of Center of about an hour duration over the whole building. We give clerical assistance by collating large Center bulk mailings several times a year. We give over 6,000 hours per year of our volunteer time freely to Center. About 50~ of our 92 members live in Roanoke County. Most of us, but not all, have come here with our husbands when their professions - business, medicine, law - brought them here. We have lived in more metropolitan areas where theater and museums were available to us such as the greater Washington and New York areas. M~~~ izus~and-was a-n -execut-r-~wi~h .Exxc--~n~-camp her~2_~_ye-~__.ago. He i~-~z-~emi_-retire==~nd___th~~a~,an, _~a_stay in~,==A~-~+-v-, My husband was the President of ITT from 1973 to 1979. When he was promoted and moved to New Jersey we kept our property ,~-, , , ~~,~,:; ~~; d~r~a on ~r-a~rc~ii niuye=xvad-~and came back when he retired. As wives of professional men we recognize the value of cultural assets such as Center in the Square to attract highly skilled employees to the area which in turn is an attraction for new industry. We feel strongly enough about the value of Center that we are willing to provide our labor free of charge. It just happens to~be located in the city limits but it serves the whole Valley As county residents we strongly recommend that Roanoke County support Center in the Square in its budget. ~Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillilillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllllll~,jll~lllllllllllllllllllllilll~jj~ - _ - ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. V~ -~ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ -_ SUBJECT: ~~-~~e -I-' __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ _ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment = whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to = do otherwise. . c c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORG~(NIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = i _ ~ ~ ~ mlllllllilllllllilllilllllllilllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllillillllllllililliillllliilillllllllllllllllllllllllilliliiilllllll~ ~Ilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllillilill 11111111111111111111 - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - _ _ APPE CE REQUEST __ - -_ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ c SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - _ ^ S Baker will be limited to a resentation of their oint of view onl . P P p Y Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B.~HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c - ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c mlillllllilllllillllillllilli1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111m 1Uilllllllllllllllllilllllilllllillllllillllllllllllllilllllllll IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~I1J _ ~ _ r _ _ ~~ _ _ _ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPE CE REQUEST __ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ - _ c SUBJECT: ~ GCC~ ~.Z~' = ~ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c __ c -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ._ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vv~th the clerk. _. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = =_ = _ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - -, - .,~ - ~.n - -an - ~v ~~ - - - - ~~ - _ - ~~ - - ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ NAME "~ ~ ~1Z.~2 ~~2~.~.,~- - - - - - - ADDRESS - - - __ -_ - - = PHONE ~'~-~ ~PG~,~,-~ ~,~.,~L,(.,( ~, _ fillllllllllllllilllllllllilillllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllillillllilllllllllllillillllllllllilllllllillllllllllll~ ~Illlllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 1111111 ll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllilllllllll IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIjjJ ,, - - ~ - _ _ - - __ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ c APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ - - ~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ uG~~ e c -_ - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ c ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to = __ do otherwise. . __. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ -- - _ mllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllilllllilillilllllilllllllllllllllilllllllillllllllilllllllilllllllllililllllllllllillllillllim EAC COMMENTS FOR BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 27, 1993 Hello my name is Nancy Bailey and I work in the Solid Waste Division of General Services. Today, I am here as the Chairperson of the Employee Advisory Committee speaking on behalf of the employees of Roanoke County. Despite shrinking budgets and an often shrinking economy Roanoke County has continued to provide a top level of service to its citizens. This is possible because the employees of Roanoke County have continuously done more and more with less and less. The employees often feel this dedication and loyalty is not returned. I stand before you asking on behalf of all County employees that you keep salaries and benefits as a number one priority when making your budget decisions. Let us not lose this opportunity to reward the people who work so hard to enhance the lives of the citizens of Roanoke County. The implementation of the salary survey team's recommendations is that opportunity. A group of employees from all levels spent more than nine months developing an extensive survey and implementation plan that will be the first step in instituting a fair and comprehensive pay plan for our employees. They then took the plan out in a series of meetings. Employees have on the whole been supportive. No plan will completely satisfy all employees. It is the sentiment of a majority of employees that it is time to do something about these problems. We believe that the recommendations made by the salary survey team will eventually ensure that all county positions are compensated equitably. For far to long we have lagged behind our counterparts in both the public and private sector in the area of salaries. Roanoke County can not afford to serve as a training ground for other localities or companies. When our competent and professional staff leave for other employment, our customer service is adversely effected and the citizens are the ultimate losers. The EAC strongly supports the salary team's recommendation of full implementation of the survey coupled with a 3% performance based increase across the board. Roanoke County is a good place to work, but all too often more money lures away the trained employee. By bringing salaries more in-line with market, it makes the other benefits to working for Roanoke County that much stronger. We are intelligent enough to know that salary increases are not always possible and we have in the past shown a willingness to sacrifice. You, the Board of Supervisors, have an excellent chance to demonstrate to the employees that they are in fact a number one priority. The implementation of this survey coupled with the continued coverage of insurance increases would go a long way towards reassuring employees that their hard work and dedication are recognized and appreciated. This survey is an important first step in moving employees towards a fair and comprehensive pay plan. Roanoke County needs to adopt such a plan and make every effort to keep salaries equal to the rate of inflation - through good times and bad. Then perhaps this situation of County employees being 150 or more out of market will not re-occur. We are simply asking to be treated fairly. We have sacrificed in past years. This year when tough budget decisions are being made we ask that these decisions not adversely affect salary increases or benefits. The employees of Roanoke County are dedicated to their jobs and to the citizens. Now is the opportunity to acknowledge that dedication. Let's make Roanoke County not only a great place to live but also a great place to work. ~iiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin~~~ _ _ - ~ - _ _ - ~> - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - APPE - _ _ - CE REQUEST - =_ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - = SUBJECT: ~ I.LQ~A = - - - - - - -' - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty of the Board to do otherwise. ._ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ _ - All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED CROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP - ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - = NAME sh ei /a `~os~.. mod / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ADDRESS ~D~ p/~~, ou.~ ,y ~~,nJos~~e. _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ - - PHONE - - - - - fii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~111 ;vi'~, ,_;d~ r "'~~~' !-{Jr.~."~!? i _ ~;Gtz, .,i _ _ !(`F' ,Svi"~ attd i~ r{,7;~?E N1 Y" !"latTtE _ :~~le- { ~ ~~_~5~ _~~-)(;'~i~~ ~ii__, _ :+... r ~.~;~ ~n~l~rYi'~r~~~ tiriG I nspe ct. i ~,ns ~?epartmant of Foanore t.o~~nty . I have been emr~ f Dyed W'~ ch Roano~:e Coun~>>y as a Permit. ;1 er{; for { {=: '? E& (' S. _ a m :~ p e a F=. l t'~ <~ : ri b er {`1c~ ? f ~~ f t- I'12 S a i a r Y ~ U I"'~.~ e '~' . he :,G~lnt•Y i S spend i n:~ ~_{ ~C~~>lsaiids of dG + ! ars h i r l n~ and t?" ^ l n' rl~ :,ersonr-~a I . In tur~t r;et"sor~~"e ": a-~e leav~n~~ your employment, almost. lmtTiei~latelY c~ti;ei" :,t"%~i~~li:i<?. fat" Ot~iE'r` poSltlons Wltl'?~in pr`1V~te ~~-,;~~;~.F, }r,cj ,a~;r orc%an } ~at.ions t.h~:_t offer fair waves. I feel that t~1"S 1S ,ati ex:p2r18F t.{'lat- tr^iFW ~=+.~,Urlt`~ uaYllio'~, al SOW ±~:J continua. A .{ ar~CJG' nl.+-Cr~bei` of E?mi_? I i%`•'eES ar"e raS"dents Of Roanoke ~~~~Llnt}~ , mYSe + f i nc 1 uded . nth i .{ e my sa I ar-y has staved V l r ~.~~aa l i y the same , my b i d s {"~a~,: e not . The taxes ar7d the h ~ gh ut i 1 ~ ty b ; 1 s continue to rise , yeP~ my salary has staved the same, and you Font}nue to eXpect me to pa~~ my ~~ ~ 1 .{ s to ~ .e ~ p k_ee;~ the ~'caur7ty ope rat i ona ~{ . I n this day and t.t me t{~!ere are a n'_amber of s ~ na.' e emp 1 ogees . k'e de not have she aclvanta~e r~ ~ a ^.t~~U C',e!..so ~ inc.~~me and i t has become d i ff i cu I t for US t0 C;?n C l !"~Ue tLi pay OUr' bl ~ i S anG yeL OUr' ? nGOme 1 S V i rtl,ia 1 ~ y f ro~et~ With promises of chancaes i n the future . I am a s i na l e parent. and bec.::~use I have not been arforded a ,competent Wage, the Fer_;,=ra " dove rY7ment h _~.s a 1 owed me to be~:c;~re an earned I ncorne Cred i t .~ pant~cipant fic~r the Iasi your` veers. I consider ~t.h~s to be a very p ~ h :~ a- r~ ,; :: ;-. n r C~ 8 ~! i:., t_J :~ t ~ t-. ~~ ~ i ~ r .^, C'; t.': 1 ;~ v' j ':~ ~ l 'l/ ,~ 1'"i Cl? Y y e .~i r S +:~'" G E' r V l ~'; ~ t, ['• At t,Nl l s t1 me I am nnt. cif. ~.~ie rn . C~-C~o i C?t, Of !;ZY (~;=~Y ~i"~d? . 1? ~ ?~!ew r~er-son were ~c1 be f-,~ red ri.t tF~,s ti,r,e they wa+.a id start a.` a 7a ?ary approx. ~ mate 1 v `~2 , C~C>i) . Gi ~ 1e i aw rn ; ~,N . ;~eFd ! css t. (_J sa•~~ , a r.ew emp 1 ogee w,:_~ ~ d r-?r,t pn-se:~s t.G-.e ~xt`ie; z ence ~~or tie know l edc?e that I ~a i ned and 1 e:-~rned , n ;?,y ro ~ ~ t, or; . ',v~ ~ i 1 e t I~,F survey does not. address ~c>n<{e •',- ~ ty o?- emr:, ~avment, seems to be a fair and competent t:~-~oi that is ~e,r,~:, p~esentGd '~_:~ You, the ~aa~-d, for your ut.i ! ; gat i on . At r east , t. de~?or~?strates a start. ~ ~~? the r- i c~ht cis rection: I s;JeaE<. tC) the boat C' (O++; 4'taVe ti`1C opp~-~r"tl,!n 7 tY ctt t~"? ? s t??7?F=' tG ft.,n~1 ~:,~~~s survey 1C1i~' ! ~ b'ar:~~~_~s committees and teams. o~ the em~~~ovees have ~;t-.r7od by ~:i~° re~~amr??ender+.-ions of the Salar~~ Sur~•ie'y Team. Now i s tha t~~ me for You t+~~ a~~ t accor~di ng l y . ~Ilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllllilllll Iillllllllllllllllllllillllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ - - _ ~ _ - ~ ~~~~~ - _ _ __ ~~ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. V-- / __ APPEARANCE RE VEST =_ - Q - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~rCITIZENS COMMENTS _ __ / /, /~ SUBJECT: ~ U . ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ! ~` L ;~~~`"~` l c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to _ P g , comment _ = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c __ vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ NAME ~ ~'' ~ - ~ r ,~ ~ -_ _ _ ADDRESS ~~ L~°~~ ~ ~ ~~,~• ,~ ~~ /°~ c PHONE ~ ~~ _ ~~~~ IIIIIIilillllilllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllilllilllilllllillllllilllllllllllllllliillllllllllllillll~ STATEMENT TO COUNTY SUPEF.tTISGtZS; April 27, 1993; Jahn Spitz These remarks will not address the proposed 1993-4 budget. Taxpayer concerns about the level and direction of County spending reflect decisions and resulting trends going back many years. There are strong feelings that taxes in general, and local taxes particularly, are out of control and increasingly burdensome. Since 1983, we have added utility license, utility consumption, 911, motel , and prepared food taxes in addition to the earlier apes (property, sales, business, cars). The perception of heavier burdens is accurate. In 1983, lacally- raised taxes of all kinds. per person, amounted to $368; for a total of $27 rr:illior~ raised locally. In 1992, the per person tax came to $776, for a total ~~f $~1.3 million. Let's remove the inflation effect by comparing the tax to per- capita income in the two years, which TJras $12,313 in 1983, and Ni6.6~7 i.n 1932. While local taxeti per persar~ rose by 1C8 ~, ir~came r7c~` L:~~rSaii rase by 35 a. ~:iat:t~r Way to See Lrie Smile effect 1S tllut local taxes tank 3a or pel:_capita income in 1983, and 4.6?~ ir; ~~~~ Despite the many new taxes referred to earlier, the general property tax was and remains the mainstay, accounting fey- 76o at local taxes raised in 1992. While the base rises year after year, assuring new revenues for t'rle Couz:ty, the rate has been quite riigli also. Gf the twelve Virginia counties wit h populations over ~~,00'J, Roanoke County has the second highest affective tax ratf~ at .~~1.C~1 per ~undY ed . It is well to pir~phasize that taxes must be paid by people out of ,~ur:~ent income or savings. Hauser a:~d land do not pa1~ taxes. Of course, all this money is spent on programs and functions which have merit. But they do not all have equal merit, and they do not necessarily take precedence aver leaving more money ir. the hands of citizens. I started by pointi.r~g out that the size of the County budget evolved over time. Local government has increased its scope, its scale, and it is paying more for what it does. Most of that increase in cost is ire the compensation of its employees. In order to stop and reverse these trends, citizens must accept lass government, and receive remaining services more efficiently. Tr:is means reduced scope by getting government out of certain functions entirely; reducing t'r~e scale of many remaining functions; and providing what remains in a clearly cost-effective manner. 1 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii~i~~ _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _ - ~ - - «- - _ _ .. _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. V APPE CE RE VEST -_ Q - _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~ C.[ 4 e.~' -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. . _ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must 6e directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ _ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = '_ vhth the clerk. -' ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF = CAF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tti1'I ~Illllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllll IIIlillillllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll III Illilllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ., _ - - .,a _ _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. V ' ~ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ESL-~4~g t° I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su erv' _ p isors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. . __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _- PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = - - _ millllllllllllllillillllllliillllllllllllllilllllllllillllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllililllllillllllllllllllllllllllilltllm ~Illlllllilllllilllllllllliillllllllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllll II IIIIIIII Illilllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~J _ - _ ~~ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - - - _ _ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - - - SUBJECT: ~~~ ~ Z'L - -_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = c - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVID DIALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - = = ~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - = = = = = = - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - _ - __ - - - NAME n?~ /~e C> - ~~~ n '" - - - _ ADDRESS ~ /u~°- ~ J~9~„ ZOO /09 ~ cc~/ SAC ie ~-- J - - o - ya- /~ ~'// /~ o c.~.n tct,in Zoo - - - PHONE - fiilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllilllillilllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllllllm ~iiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiii~iiuiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~ _ - - ~ ' r` - ~, ~ ~ - - - - - .,. -_ -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~- / _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - __ = '~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - ~ ~9 - _ _ - suBJECT: e - _ _ _ _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c = - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - - - with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORG = - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROMI THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _ - - - - - _, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ - - - e, - - - - NAME ~/ e, / Al o ~ ~ u ~ r'e1'~ C_ - - - - - _ - _ - - ADDRESS Q' • M L/s ~ - - - _ - - - - - -_ - ~ - - - -" PHONE /nG~.~ S/~ O/' Q-~-j p - - lltlilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllil IIIIIIilllllilllil~ _ _ ~ _ - - ~o- 'Y`` ~ ~_ AGENDA ITEM NO. V _ / = _ APPE CE REQUEST _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ SUBJECT: _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to i do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vv~th the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c ~~-~. t~ NAME ~. ' c -_ -_ ADDRESS ~ I G i'1 h~ ~ Ct Y~ 1i1 ~ n~0 [~ PHONE ~~ ~-- ~ ~ (~~ IIIlililllllllllillllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllllllilllllllllllliillllllllllillllllliilllllllillllllllllllllil~"I Uiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiii~~~~ _ _ - ~ . ~ - __ - S' _ ~ ~r "yNty~.~r ~ - - - a - AGENDA ITEM NO. V - - _ - _ - = APPE CE REQUEST _ - _ - _ - ' /` PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - n - 1,~ _. SUBJECT: -_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting- on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME .Yl C,~~ ~ - - o ~~~ - - - - - - - -_ -_ ADDRESS - - ~~ - - _ - :~, - PHONE - - _ - - b~"~~~lci - illllillllllllllillllillilllilllllilillllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllillllllllitlllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllm u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uu = .. _ _ _ _ __ _ _. AGENDA ITEM NO. V ^ / - APPE CE REQUEST __ _ _ __ "'PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c _ - _ - -_ -- __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WI7H THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c fiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuniiiiiiimi~ill ~~iiiiutiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~~~ - - _ - _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. V-L = _ __ _ = _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~ G~~ `°~" ,., I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ c c c _ - __ NAME C'..Gr.- ro / r~ ~' ~ c c _- __ ADDRESS Slc~~ o r Z~ -~ ~- ~ ~/ ~ c -_ PHONE /''O ~ ~'~ ~ c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r- lllllllllllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllliilllllilil~ = ~,: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. -_ _, _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ SUBJECT: .~ GCd a ~ - ,~' ../ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ ~_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ c = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - ~ - - -.t..~-~... - _ _ _ _ ADDRESS ,~~ Vc~ //e c,~ Ec. are o m i c.. __ __ PHONE ~ t° ~P_~ O~ ~ ~ ~' ~Gt. r' ~/'1 e.r' .S~ ~ - _ /~ fiilllllllllllllllllilllilllllillllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllliilliillllllllllllllilllillilllillliillllllllllnl Utillllllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllll~ - ~,,, - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - ~ _ - _ - APPE CE REQUEST _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c _. = SUBJECT: -' c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: -' s ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. a ~~ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~_ ~ ~ s /~)~~f~~ ~ ~ NAME -_ _ ~, ADDRESS - Cc _ __ -_ 1 PHONE ~ ~ ~--~ S~ U~1 ~,~ r~JP~ I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 iii lliiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ _ _ _ _ _ z~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1~ -~ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ ' APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - SUBJECT: - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. . _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c - _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - - - vnth the clerk. - - _ - __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - ~ ~ c - - - NAME CZ.~ ?~, ~~ . - - - - - ADDRESS ' ~ ~ ~~~..~,~.~ - - PHONE ~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I ~,.~ ., Ullllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllllllllllitllli~ll~lll~ - -_ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. {Ir_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - `PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - SUBJECT: =_ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ -_ i ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ _. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = c = NAME _. _- ADDRESS ~ I PHONE ~ ~.~: ~ (¢-l ~ ~ `~'7 - ls>~l 13) mlllllllliillliillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllillllll~l +~~ ~ _'~ Ullllllllllllltilllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllilliilllllllllllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. V- - _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: =_ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c -_ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = NAME A: _- _ tin. _ - ADDRESS a I PHONE ~ ~3 - ~ ~ 7 ~' ~(~ ~~ _ __ -_ mlllllllllliiilllllilllilllllillllllilllllllilillli Ililillllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllillllllllllillliillillllllllllillllllll~ 111IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIII1IIiIIIIIIIi1IIIIIIIII1IIIiIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIiIIi~~IIIiIi~ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ ---- _ _ APPE _ _ CE REQUEST X PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty ot~the Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _.. NAME -' - ~~, ,~ ,~ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ -' PHONE _ ~ ~-_(~~~ j ~.~, ~ ~(~ illllllllllilllllillllilllll Ilillllllllllllllilllillllllilllllllllillllllllilillllllilillllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllillllll~ U1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111J ~ y _ _ _ _ - ~ ~:` - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ =_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~C I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ s ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. . _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS ,SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK .._.-- _ _ NAME ~) d ell aiv Is - _ _ _ - _ _ - ~ i ( S elvr G2 66~ o~ ADDRESS __ PHONE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIililllllllllillillllllllllllllllillllllllliliillllllllllilllilllliilllllllllllilllllllllllllllliillllllllll~ Ullllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllliilll~ .~~~ _ ~.s,~ - _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ APPE CE REQUEST =_ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ -_ SUBJECT: ~ ~ ~L d ~ ~ ~f ?~~. /t~G I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: s ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to = do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF fl1V ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - _ c fiillllillillllliillliliilllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllliliillillllllllillillllllliilllllillllliiilllllllllllllllliillillllll~"~ ~Uiuiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~~~ _ .~ _ ~~ +~' _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~''~~' 1 _ APPE CE REQUEST - - - -_ - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~} I, - SUBJECT: ~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~ L UUn~G ~ ~~.~~ ,_ -_ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. _ - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ - _ - fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~11'1 UIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllilllllllll~ ,~ ~'~.~. ~_ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ <_ ~- SUB CT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - fititttitttittttitiltttttittlttttitttttttitittittititittiititittititttititltitttilitlttttitittttitttittittttttititititiltttitittti~"~ j~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillliilllillllllllllllllllllll~ _ ~- _ _ ~,,. , _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~ ~//p{~/' r ~ SUBJECT: V - ~ '"~f;r~' ~ ~..< ~ ,~ ''»',~ .* ,: __ ~ ~ 7F ~ ~t ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to _- do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c fittttltiltlittllitllllillltllltliiltlititlllttttlillllllitllliltliltltlllllllittliilltliilttllittllllllllllitititllillllllllllllin"~ s r C m O m m rn m z v c 'm^ V/ O j co j ...L o~ 0 j 00 ..~ co N m -~ D ~ ~ co w j j o~ j co j ao v w j 0 N ~ N O O O DOLLARS (Thousands) O O ~ C~ V ~ O O O O C D r C rn O ~rn o~ r m _ -< m m ~° m m n r Z C C7 O ~rn Tx V m m D r r ~rn CO C11 r~ rWn W N Ullllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllillllllilllllllllillllliillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllll~ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINAI~,T~~,~G ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS ~'N r /~i~UX~'T,~3,~/ ti~ ~~''~Gr v f - SUBJECT: i~USo lG ~.s o~~S' , z . 7~ ,~~.~,~ ~ ~L ~ -_ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of upervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oi~the Board to = do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. _ __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK `~ ~~ a~.~ _ ~_ ~ _ /LQ~~ ~ -_ -_ NAME ~T~~.~p ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~-T-CEjZ -- - -_ ADDRESS l,, /~ t ~ ~ ~ ~Vl~~, ~~U~- ~~y~ -_ _- PHONE ~ ~ ~. / fillllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllillillllllllilllllilliliilllillllillllllllllilitlim Ullillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillilliilllllllllllllllllllllllllillilll~ ,~ - .~ ~• AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST - -_ /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS r SUBJECT: ~ ~c~ ~. ~~ s~~ ~ra ~. f2 c~a. ~~~ke ~t lI~ ~ ~. cj ~ rn u ,~ ~ .-~~ ~~ },. c! I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,.~IALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK __ mlllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllililillililllilllllillliilllllllllliillllllllillililllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllll~ ~j~lllllllllilllllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllll~ .,. ~ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I APPE CE RE VEST - Q _ __ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS -_ SUBJECT: '''n ~-~~ 1 ~ a~ tom. ~.~ ~ uS of ~o ar-c~lc.~ ~ CuQ.e.,e-~ ~.~d ~~ ~2 c~ t-t2s1- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: i _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c __ vr~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c __ __ mllillllllilllllllllllllllllllillllllllilllillillllllllllllllllllllilllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllm ~U 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ ,~ - _ _ a t-" a ~ ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. V J . APPEARANCE REQUEST =' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~- SUBJECT: ean~a~ ~}eq ~~"~~ ~PX~~ c~ ~ u ~ q et __ M _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ' BELOW: __ c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c 5 a m t a~ ltii ~y„S ~2 V `'`~°p - - mlllllllllilllllllllillllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllilllllilllllllim TESTIMONY PRESENTED BEFORE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS April 27, 1993 Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you this evening. I am Diane Kelly, Executive Director of the Mental Health Association of Roanoke Valley. The Mental Health Association is a non-profit, non-governmental organization with more than 500 members who work to educate citizens of the Roanoke Valley about issues related to mental health and mental illness and advocate for quality care and services for those who suffer from mental illnesses. As advocates, we support Mental Health Services' request for allocation of funds for the next fiscal year. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley is the Community Services Board which provides mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse services to the citizens of the counties of Botetourt, Craig, and Roanoke and the cities of Roanoke and Salem. The funding request submitted by Mental Health Services was prepared in accordance with the local match policy which calls for matching all state base funds at a 90:10 ratio with local tax dollars. Mental Health Services' request represents the amount necessary to maintain all programs at their current level of service. Mental Health Services provided mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse treatment or counseling services to 946 Roanoke County residents in the fiscal year which ended in June, 1992. The value of these services was $1,567,632. This represents $22.40 in services for each local match dollar which the county provided. For FY93, Roanoke County allocated $79,332 to the agency. Mental Health Services has requested an allocation of $107,101 for the fiscal year 1993-94. Appropriations in a lesser amount than that requested will jeopardize state funds and existing service delivery. The effects of local funding each year at less than the requested amount are cumulative. The unmet needs of clients throughout this system are staggering. We cannot continue to deny individuals with mental disabilities the services they need to enable them to live successfully in our community. On behalf of the Roanoke County citizens who continue to benefit from the services of this agency, I thank you for your time and for your consideration. ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~Jj~ _ _ .: _. _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1/~ I c _ _ APPE CE REQUEST v PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS =_ SUB CT: ~~ ~ -_ JE J ov- a Z Vt S ~ e S,i ~ e v~ u IM a w~{ ~~ V ~in~n ~ ~~ ~_ J I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _- _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - _ millillllllllllillillllllllllllllllillllllll IIIIIIIIIIilillllilll111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~"~ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ -_ _ SUBJECT: .~J~-'~ ~' r - ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ \ = __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ,_ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c ~) ~~ _ - _ _ - _ filllllllllllllllliilllililllllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllliillllillllllllllllllllllliilllllillllllllllllillilillillllllllillll~! `O -~ .~ W ~ ~ of ~ O ~ "~ pp .r- w E-+ v of ~ obi ~ ~ `~ '^ C3 .~ •v ~_ ,.- u, ~ :~ .~ ~ N 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 'CY ~ ~ o~ ~ ~' ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~~ ti v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .c ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ C O_ 5 ~' ~~ ~ W n~ Z N oo ..o ~ .~ ' : ~ ~ ~o ~' .~ cs v ~ v a ~ y •~ Ol lr •~ •r+ of C1 ? ~ ~ ~ :; ~~„ ~~~ ~ 'CS ~~, ~ op p 'CS x1, ~' .~ ~ .~ ^ O v ~ t- "O ~ 0 ~ U ~ V 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ol ~ ~ Q x v ~- O E r is moo, ~ .-~ x ~ ~ ~ ts, ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ct `~ ~ o o {/,~~J,.~ (, ~ z zy o ~. ~s ~ ~ ~ o .a ~s x .... ,,, .c~ cs ~ .-. ~, o N ~ H ~ Ol ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ •~ ~ •O'O p •~ ..._. ~ cif of 'Ct ~ ~ >` of p ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ „~ M ~ °' x N ~ obi ~ N O ..C ~ ~ ~ ~'' ~v O SZ, ,.q "~ `~ • • ~~ try '~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-' f~-l.~ ~ O H "" .~ ° ~i o ~ ~ ~ •v ~ v ~ o ~ ~ ~ oq ~ of ~ ~i ~ ,r~ v ' X011, y "~ ~ ~ ~ o 'v '~ ~ O ~n o~i A O Ct ,~ ct .~ ~ CS O O v ~ ~ ~ fJ, `~ Ct ~ ~ N p ~ Cf ~ ~ b M -~ Q. ,,, ~• ..-~ A O o ~ o, ~ v '... ~ `-, c3 of of e.9 r- ^ ~ .-~ n.. of 1. o~ ~ O .i] O W ti N ~j ~ ~ v ~ .-C ~ ~ a' ~ v A pj v ..~ ~ N O CS O .~., ~J ~ _ ~ ~ °N` ~ ~ ~ ~ CS ° ~ ~ 'Ci ° of ~ ?, ~ ~' 'tY obi , c ~ b ~O O ~ ~ CS ~ O ~ ~ .C ~ `~ '.~ v~ o~vfi ~ ~ ~ 0~. O ~ ~ ~ O A., ~ v O O O~1 N • ~ ~ CS U Q ~ ~ o~ v ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ of ~ v 0 0 0, ..~ 'Q ~ o 'Q ~ ~ ..c ~ ~ v ~ ~ Q '~ o O ulillllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllll~ _ _ ..~. - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ -_ SUBJECT: ~~ ~ YYl VYl ~.t1.c ~(~VI ~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the s ~ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. BLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ PLEASE PRINT LEGI _ -- _ _ - _ fiilllllllllllllllilllillllilllllllilllllil 11 lllllllllllllllllililllllililllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllilillllllllllillillllillm ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIII11111111111111111111111i11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111J _ --- _ _ . - _ ~ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. =,~ _ - _ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ a = SUBJECT: ~ .`` / ,~ ;:st a,? .~~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. - = = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. EGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _ PLEASE PRINT L _ _. - _ mllllllillllllllilllilllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllilllillillllllllllllfull ill iillllllllllllllll1111IIIIIIIIIIIII111111~ u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ _ _ _ ara ¢ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~" ~~ - - APPE CE REQUEST _ __ jC PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ -_ SUBJECT: ~ - ~ ~ -~ a = ~ ~~ -~--rS~-~ `~~ ~ 4+~c~ ~~'~' .a.l ^~ ~ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment i whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c - ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _. _ _ fiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiininiiiiiiiiiimmiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiuiiiii~i~ llllllllllllllllllllllilllllliliilllllllliilllllllllllillllllllillllllilllillllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllillllillllllllllll11) _ _ _ - ~~ - . - AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST _ _ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _ _ SUBJECT: ..~;~r:~.?. ~ ~='.~C1r r -_ a _ ~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS =_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to __ do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - _ - _ _ __ -_ - - - mllllllllllllllliilllillilllllllilllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllliillllllllllllilllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllll~ ~~Illlllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllil~jj~ - - - r ~, - _ m _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE RE VEST a ~ ~~ s ~_ ~ ~ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS c _ SUBJECT: ~i~C.`'-~TOn I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c __ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIYID UALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ -_ _ ~ - NAME ~a~ r ~ c, ~ c.. ~C:.,R,~c:.~-~ ADDRESS ~~ ~ u~z ~ l lam; ;~.~~ ~ Z~~ c PHONE ~5 - i5 ~~' mllliiliilillillllllliiililliill111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 UIIIIIIilllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Illllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllillllillllllll~jj~ _ ~ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' APPE CE REQUEST - ~ - i - __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ SUBJECT: ~- ,~,~ ,~~a , ~~ _ {~ J '~..z-~ y ~' _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ __ __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. -. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON RF.HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ c = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ~ _ i ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ NAME ~ ~~ ~ ` '~ u_ _ ~ 2_ Pte; __ _ `,U` %<? ADDRESS ~~ i ~ ~ ~=j?~N r<~ , ~~ ~~=~~' - ;~U1 i~~ ~ ., _ __ _. PHONE ~: ? mllllllilllillllilliillllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllllllilllillllllllllllllllililllilillillllilllililllllllllllllllllliillllm lllililllllllllllllillillllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillllllllll Illllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~jj~ _ ~ _ _ _ ~, _ s - ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE - CE REQUEST __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~"f CITIZENS COMMENTS _ -, ---. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the 'c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ,_ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - _ _ _. -.., ADDRESS 1 ~ '~ ;_ PHONE = ~ ~--4-- ~., __ ~- ~ . ~, ` c mlllllllilliiilllllli IIIIIIiilllllllilllllllllllillllllllilllllillilllllllllllllllllilillllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIillill 111111111111 - - ~k~._ ti . ~ ~ t. ~ C_ C~.~l__.a~.. _ , ~f t-. I " Ulllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllilllllllll~jj~ _ _ - _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ `' f APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - ~ SUBJECT: ~^ -~ ,~-~1 ~.Y~. - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c _ c BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ c = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = c = NAME ,-~ ,~ . ~~ _ _ ADDRESS iG I "~ ; 1 ~,~~ ~\ $~f , ~ ~ ~? ~ PHONE C%~ ~ ; ~ ~---~ ~' ~ ~, (~^; ~ mllllllilllililllilllillillllllllllilllillllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllliillll~l UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllilllilllllllllllillllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST -_ _ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c c -_ . - SUBJECT: -.S~ / ~~ C P ~ K S ~~' ~c ~'`-- /9 . ~''" .~ ~ ~ f ~ V , ~ ~ ~a r CSC.; I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. w - e - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ i ~ _ - ~~ ~ - ~ - ~ _ __ - ~_ ~ _ ~ ~ - NAME -e v~ ~. ~ ,/ - y-. = l ADDRESS ~J C~ f ;,,~ - S _ - _ -_ _ - PHONE ~ ~/ ~ _ _ .S- 7 ~ ~~ IIIIIIIIIIilllllillllllllllllllillllllllilillllllllllllilllllliillllllillllillllilllilllllllllillllllllllllillllllll llllllllillim j~lllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllillillllllllllllilllilllllllli~ = ~,° _ - ~ _ __ __ AGENDA = _ ITEM NO. _~ - - _ APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: 1~ n O ~ A ` s n c,Q L S O c_~ e~t" _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ -_ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. - _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ NAME ~ Ci. r~C~ Co n n e ~ ~ ~K ~ C~.c.~L te, I , ~ ~-car . .. ADDRESS a a ~ o~~ U ~ c,c.£ `~- ~ r - _ _ __ __ PHONE ~ ~ ~ - S '~ `7 0 mlllllllllllllllilllillillllllllllilllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllll~l lllllllilllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllilllilllllllilllllllllllllilllllllilllll~ _ ~`~' _ ~~ _ -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE C~ RE VEST - Q - _- - -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - ,-- SUBJECT: +!i .',~._;~ , ~ ~' ; =_ -_ _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -, _ __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c ~ t~ _ - c NAME ~>~ ~ ~ ~~` ~_ ~;~ j ~L 1 ~ ~ L ~ l~r v _ _ ADDRESS ~`~ ,=~ p~~ ~, s. ~=1 ~~w ~~~?Y~r~T 3U~ i~ l rz~~ ~'- c PHONE _ ~~ ~;~ 7 ~ ~ -= ;~~ ~' ~ mllllllllllllllllilillllllllllliliiilllllilililillilillillllllllllilllllllllllllilllllliilllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllilllll~ u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ _l _ AGENDA ITEM NO. I+~ __ _ - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - - - = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~X ~~ ~ C c = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c -_ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ __ i ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ~- ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized e speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME L}-~I c ~~ ~ooK c - ~/~~ T~c i~ E~ ~-- _ - ADDRESS .~ /(o / - ~a ~~~ y L.~/. ~. U/• ~ frn/o~ ~ ya i ~ PHONE ~ ~ - ~ ~~(~ c fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i1'1 ~U~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~~~IIIIIIIIIIIIj1) _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ __ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. V - / APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~--~ SUBJECT: __` I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED i ~ BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c - - miIIIIIIIIIilllllilllllllllllllillllllllliiilllllllllllllllilllllilllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllillllillll~l'11 U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ - o - - - _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - - - - _ ~ _ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~. ,;f " ~ '~ =_ a ~ ~ / ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,/ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only, = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c ~ c _ ~^ - - ~~ ~ i NAME ~ ~~. ~ ,-~ ~ = ~ _._ ~~ _ - /f ADDRESS ~~~ ~~ ,\~~ ~~~ ~ ~ a --~ ~ ~'~~ PHONE ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i' mllillliililllllllllllllillllilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllllllllllllllillliillllllilllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllll~"! Mrs. Lela C. Spitz, 389-4187 1971 Cak Drive Ext. Salem, VA 2415s April 27, 1993 COMMENTS TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, RE: 1994 BUDGET - The une,A~lcyment rate is still higrI. - Federal taxes are unquestionably going up; and these taxes will be even higher wren: when the health plan is implen.erted. - T'r~e total dollar amount of County taxes also was raised this year. - People are already struggling to pay trleir Mils; some are fat_irg bankrkuptcy, others den' t have enough money to support their farr~i 1 i es ; ar~d others wi i 1 indeed 1 oose thei r hDITieS . - Some older folks must simply da without tie proper medicines. And still, the County is proposing increased spending!!` Why' - Why do you give our hard-earned tax money for projects that we do NOT consider priorities? Especially in these difficult economic tirr~es. - `?ou just voted tG spend 535.^UO for a temporary, unnecessary °i^oad to the Explore Park. We need that money for ti~ings we consider a higher priority. The Explore Park will probabliT NEVEF. be a Ir:GI:e1j making vonture. They assured LIS that they kaGUid i7Gt aS~i; uS, tGr operating money, and ye`.- treat 1S eXa~tl'~ Wriat tri~>' are dGZng; an A they are asking for additional .,Toney on top Gf the 1J'3 million dollars we are being asked to pay for Rutroug`rI Rd. Since tris is a State park: tree State should ;1e paying the Gperating expenses. Private citizens are free to give .~:oreey to Expic;re if they can affor+:z i ~., but please don't take money from taxpayers who canriG- afford ._. I ASFC YCU PLEASE idCT TO GIVE ANY T?~Y MONEY FOR THIS PROJEU'T - Then there's tree matter` Gf the County charter being ai~nereded to a iGw a HoteliMGte: taX. The F.oanor:e Convention & Visitor's Eureau had the nerve tG 1G;~by trie Gerera Assembly on this I-natter , and successful 1 y read tree measure amended so that lU~~ ~ of reveriue from trl,s taX. WGUid go to "tGllri.Slil"! Lihat arrGganr:e! r' ilust W110 d0 't".ley think they are? And to add insult tG injury, I see that the proposed budget =lC=odes a sepal ate "gift" :>r'E'C1fi:::a' ly eal`r~.ariiea fGY the RGanO}ie '~GnVenti Gn Visitors Eureau. Since consolidatiGre failed, I figured Roanoke would fired so~;~e otrier way to get our money for trieir ill-fated downtown projects -- and triey certainly are trying. They have nG business attempting to change our criarter to suit their Gwn purposes, and County citizens r~ron't stand far triis outrage. I CAN'T EELIEVE YOU WOULD EVE!V CONSIDER GIVING MONEY TO UND~HANDED GROUPS Writ Ate DOING THEIR BEST TO STEAL IT FROM US'. SEND THEM A MESSAGE, DGPd'T ^'IE 'n:iEM ;-~ DIi~E FROM AN-Y TPA SOURCE -NOT FOR ADVERTISING OR ANYTHING ELSE. roe need a COmpa551onate EGard of .`'~Upei`ViS'G'aS Who understand treat ~:iti ei"1S arF struggling to make ends~~'ajnd a Board who will CUT SPENDING! We need a County ndr:LLnistrator who i.s dedicated tG keep costs clow~ri, ~a'~.l.ie operating an efficient County govert~rnent. This means starting with a zero-based budget every year, and a prillO:;Gpeiy tl'iat less gOVeL`nment 1S better. If Ui.r Current Adl"Cil.rii:~t'atvr CaT1T'igt dG tr:1S, t,leL"e a~`e plenty Gf i~LLSii:esS P_xeC1.It2VeS arGll"1~ Writ arP_ ~7GG;'i aCl<'?'L1.n15tratOrS aTZC~i !iii'V keep +~GSty dGtknf r ` r". 1 ~~ ~~ ~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ j j~ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST __ - „PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS SUBJECT: ~c'rv ~' < < ~ ~-z ~ ~ ~ G ~e 7 ~ ~~ ~ ~".~~t i ~ ~~., _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ _ _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ _ _ NAME o ~ ~ ~~ ~ -%~ • _ - _ ADDRESS ~ 7y~ i„~-~. PHONE 77 `~~ ~ ~ ~' - mllllllilllllillilillllllllllillllllllllillilllllilllllllllllillllllllililllillllllllliiilllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllilll ilil~" REf'lARKS BY TERRI LYNN CORNWELL, PH.D., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE ARTS COUNCIL OF THE BLUE RIDGE AT RDANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING April 27, 1993 My name is Terri Cornwell, Executive Director of The Arts Council of the Blue Ridge, with offices located at Center in the Square in downtown Roanoke. As an organization of more than 75 individual cultural groups spanning the area from Blacksburg to Lynchburg to Lexington, we have been pleased to receive the support of various local governments including Roanoke and Botetourt counties, as well as the cities of Roanoke and Salem. We thank you for past funding and hope that, this coming year, you will continue to support our wide-ranging programs. Since 1976, The Arts Council has served as a clearinghouse for cultural information, a resource for individual artists and cultural groups, and a leader in arts advocacy. Our regular programs include: Center Scholars, a scholarship program for high school students to work with professional artists. This year's class included students from Cave Spring, William Hyrd, Glenvar, and North Cross high schools. The annual City Art Show, no~v in its 14th year, and the only juried show for area artists from the cities and surrounding counties. This year's show has more than 13C~ entries. Brown Bag Arts, a free noontime concert series in the summer featuring local performing artists and providing entertainment for all area residents who happen to venture downtown for any reason. But our most visible and most important program this year has been our coordination of "Blueprint 2000: A Cultural Plan for the Roanoke Region of Western Virginia." This project, initiated in 1991, involves a wide range of individuals from area cities, as well as the surrounding counties. More than 75 individuals have been serving on task forces to examine such issues as funding, economic impact, diversity, arts education, and areas of mutual support to create the first comprehensive cultural plan for the region. Of particular benefit to Roanoke County are the aspects of the Blueprint which deal with economic development and quality of life. By mid-May all eight task force reports will be complete and a draft document will be circulated among the cultural organizations for approval. The Arts Council will be assisting with the implementation of many of the recommendations in the Blueprint and support from local governments is vital, if the plan is to be successful. Tentative recommendations of interest to Roanoke County include expansion of arts education programs, particularly those providing outreach to area schools; creation of an Arts Education Coalition of educators and artists to better coordinate information on current programs and to advocate more support from the State for arts education; and joint projects with the tourism community to improve the marketing of 'the area's outstanding cultural offerings. Finally, I would like to mention a special program 2 instituted this year by The Hrts Council. We have made a commitment to increasing access to our programs for disabled individuals. To our knowledge, we are one of the first cultural groups to employ on a regular basis a sight-impaired individual, who happens to be a resident of Roanoke County. We would very much like to expand this program, but, because of limited funding, we have been unable to do so. Increased support from Roanoke County would help us strengthen our commitment to this important segment of our population. Once again, thank you for your past support, and we hope you will join us this coming year as we attempt to strengthen our current programs and begin implementation of Blueprint 2000. 3 2 O O O A VISION FOR THE CULTURAL COMMUNITY OF THE ROANOKE REGION OF WESTERN VIRGINIA Blueprint 2000 Timetable Winter, 1991 1'1ajor Cultural Organizations Request Arts Council to Coordinate Cultural Plan Spring, 1991 Summer, 1991 Fall, 1991 Winter, Spring 1992 Summer, 1992 Fall, 1992 Winter, 1993 Steering Committee Organized B]ueprint Planning Process & Research Agenda Organized Research Begins Surveys Conducted Focus Groups Held Research Analyzed bask Forces Organized Task Forces Conduct Additional Research Spring, 1993 Task Force Reports Drafted Blueprint Drafted Approval Process Begins Summer, 1993 Final Blueprint Published Blueprint Distributed to Business, Govt., Community Groups Planning for Implementation Begins Fall, 1993 Implementation Begins AMI -RV ALLIANCE for the MENTALLY ILL of ROANOKE VALLEY P.0.13ox 13954 l2oanolce, VA 2403f3 (703)977-3470 MY r~JAME. I ' `~ raAraC`,' F-'FtriF°'F= I'f'7'. a: FE~:F='F;;E=.`,F.~.r~!°r TF•;E~: f=~L_.t...Ifir•ICwF f=C]F; 'THE" ME:~RI TAI__I__Y I L_L_ C)1= 'THi~ F:QARIC7F`:E= UAI.._I_F~"`:. TF•;E~ r~aL_L T ArJC::tr~: I :., Cat:)t°1F='r; I ~E::n f :l~' H• A r'i I L_ :I: E~ c.3 - Arab F= F~; I E~ r~I D v~ C~11__ -r F ~ j f~ .~ t°1 E~ ra "f' Fa L L._'r` 1: L_ L_ Fi ra D . "I° H E: t~l ~ t~J "f' A I i Y I L L ~1 - t 7 F~; E= M ~ I.I__ V ~. ~~; . C] LJ F; C f:T Fa l.._ :[ r] 1 t..! ' - :C tyl F=' F~; U (:' L'-:: ~T F~; E` Ca L~ ~; i_ :E l" Y _ __ t.`1 F~ L_ a: F= E- r o r: •T L_I r, ti, r A F; F= I._ a: r.:; r ~:I:i L•~J z ~~~ F-I r.:: F-I F-~ c._~r~ :r. r., r•1E~: ra T~ L_. a: L._ L... r~E~: ~ ~ ~ ~ . a I-; E:. ALI.._ I Firdt.,E~ ~Jf..7L.Jl__I1 I_ I I~::E= Tn r{F; .T. hai:•T '1°C:l 'rC7lJ1=~ AT1"L~raT I C:Ira "rF••IE= h.ICEI:? E=OF, ~I:~ F;'~;' a: C;f.= ;.:; F= [1F;; _I..F..I[:=iC:>E` t"; C7LJra'T'Y FtE:::~~ .T. I~~E:~I`a T'f:~ E~+LJI:::•F='E~:E~~: I r~JC~ E= F~'tt7M r~lEvraT~`~I._ * t~t'•1~~E: M(~it'aAC~E~F~i.:i AF~;E=: r~lE_E:::Df~.'17 "i"C7 c~E~F= t'If.=N"rAL_ F•i~Fyl.._l..F~i C:'CJr~lc:il..lt°I f.-Fi`.:} A=:.~ I•= F;E~ (at.JL:.I`dTLY ACi r~1F.C.=I)CI:) I h~l •1"HF I F~i F~FW `:_ I T?1= hJ'T I tiL_. aE°:~T~'T I haC~.`:3 , 4'~I..IE'1'~F•;~::I :L "r T-cEw l:N F'F~F~:F.~.:r~l"rAL F~;C1ML:~. F•;C?MF: ~ F='(::.iFti r'~I:)-_1L_l°C~ C.:iFi ('~tt~ara E=iF'ryf~:Tr1E_r~IT~•5 f.:1F; F-IC_7hIE=:~'+. C::ME.FCE~:r~J C, `{ c::3~R'JIC~I~':I f:~'a"AI°=F= Af;E` hJ1=iI:)II? Ti::i FF~"':~1°'Cal`~JI~~ F='f~.:C:;l`1F=''1'I._Y l=JF;F_F~F~ A C;f~t I ~ I ~ I C~ C.-J C_ f"LJF~:F: I r~JC'~ , "F'C- C~C71._.L_f-1I:~C]F";F~l'~f.~: 4~J I l"F..I l••F.9F-- F:'C:tL._ a: C:E_: r~~T "F'HF~: ,'::'i I T'F~: r;hJI7 '~l_iF='{='C]F;;'a" 'I"F°If _ F'C]L_ I C'(~ I r•.I T'F-IE: I f`i E:F`"1= t7 F;~a" a , F'-`it~Jl:) ~T~t::l I~I:'C~ I r~l A`~i':.~E:.:::i ~I"IE= I~I'1" C3 C.. "r F•; E:~ t°i F= ra l" A I._ F•; E_: A L_. ~f' F-I C: C7 ra E~ l.i t'I F. _ F~~ a: r~J "I° F; E` .•":7 I 'T I.i A T I CJ r•.I . a; A1=1=C.){~:DACiI._1= I-; CaC.I:~IP`at:.~ :I::i I~aF:I:WDE:"1::) "rt:l ("'1-~t:)'~JII)E A I:)L::C~L~:.r•.I~~i` E~t•i'.1IF:C7t~IMF~h.I"r t}J T "f'E-I AF='~'Fit]F'F; I ri°rE~ ~i.lF'F~'C.1F~:`r ARII~ :iLJF"'F.~:F;'v' a.'-'~ I C)r~l "I°C:) E~:N`:;I If~;E:' "rF-Ir'~T~ F;:E:.I.._AF' I)CJI-f::i r~C)'1" Q~..:,'CLJFi . ?K 'JCIC;AT I C:1hJAI._. f.7F='F'C7F:T'l_7rd :f. T' a: f.~E:~ ryF~:~ ha E.E:DE:D F= nF~: l"F•;C.:1caE~: l~lF-I C] F-iAI:) C7r~ ~E"r CJ F= i I.._Lh~lEc~v3 F'F: I t~F~; 'a"t:a r= z r~l I `.-.~F•; I r.IC~ ::~C:I°;C.:)C]1.._ t:JFi F.":3l`AI~I._ I `•_~3F; I t`aC Fl '~„'f.]CA~T I C7ra . ARID f=C?F; TF-ICtc3E. WHC:I li1Ar:IT' 7'CJ F•~:I:w"f'LJF;ra "I°C7 TFIF~ l~lC.Jr?F:: f='C7F;t":F. ~{I.JT' taE:FI) Fi aSI';STF~ar•.ICvEI T r~J I) C:l I r~l t:~ t,~, C) , 1"F~.:Ar~arF"'t:1FR:7'AT .T. C1ra .T. f3 haF~E:-I7E~:U l~'CJ ty~3Ca I E:>T MF..:h.il"F'~L-.. F-IL-`.i-,L..l~'F-i t:: C7raSCJr1Ef•~:~ a: rJ C:r l..l °r I__'t' I ra f~ A 1=~: F_. A' ("1 F= °r F; l: ~ C, O i..l ra'•1" `{ t i`.I A f~ C' E~'~ `:; I RI C:, ;.~a k. f t'•J .T. t.`: E: w3 . l" I•-1 E": Et C.) F-i ~': U C.J F`~ ~r t_1 F~' E:= F~:'~r' I f? C1 F; F-I A r; 1.. F•; E:= F"' fl btJ E:" F~: 1: r~J C ; F.: T. _I.. a: ha C=~ _f. H F" I:~ LJ I) f.=~ E=.'I" F= C~ 1 Fi r-~:C.IAr~IC]f::E=• GCTI.J rJ'T'Y` ~Tt:l FLrCT t:7t`a i ~.'.E= ' . TI••;E= l= RIL:.rI:~.`::T W I TI...i Dr71 I r~F;`:3 'TF••IL A L_ I_ a: (~a ra C. E~. A;::i k:: '.., 4` C:1 L.1 "r O F= LJ RI I) M E ~: r~J ..f' F`. L.. .._ .... . F-I E= A L_ T' F-I f:~ E ~ F~~'•,•' :f. C: E #Y; r.'i F::• "f F; E:~ f fa A RI C;1 F:: F ~: VAL_C._E Y . TF•;L'_ AC~EI'•JC~';' F=:F L3F='t_)r.1 r3 :f. F~L_.f::~ Ft:7Fi DE= I.._ I'J1.=.f~; I ha[:.i ~TI-;I:~ I`~.11:= l:=I ?E:_IJ '~i~ I°~:'v' a: t":F~'c3 7' (J r i C~~ f ~: E:: A T E~. f~; I:) E:: C; F~; E: ~ '7" I-; A r~.l `{ C) Ll F-I F=~'~.~' . , E~ a: ri l° F-I E:~ F"' G'; C=. T . I TF~;Ar•JI~:: `{CJi_.1 F='C]F~; 'TH I "3 C7r~'F'f.]f;l"C.lr~l I'I`Y ~rra `:;F''~'AI~`: r~P•aI) `{C?l..-F~; F:: I tlI~ ATT~:hl~~r i nRl „~ ~~ IBSi/0~ •S•n a O 2 ~ ~ W ~`~ ~bNOg~ 171/l4 O~~ w~ ~~ •1SNOSa3~~3f n ~ ~ Z 5 ~ ~ y '1S OHE a Q J x OLL ¢ wwm W 1 ~ ~ o ~ . ~' O LJl ~ ~J~ ~••j ~~ ~ ~ ~gg r ~ TJl ~ ~•i-= lti ~~~ ~~° ~ ~ ~ ~~~ p ~ W p ppR-~O z ~ . cn MM " ' V~U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z`~ ~~ ~ ~ o g ~ '~ o o ~m ~--I ~ m x ~ ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of .Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Appropriation Request Agency: Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. Requested County Appropriation for 1993-1994 - $10,000 In the 1993 Fiscal Year the Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. respectfully requests county funding in the amount of $10,000 to support our efforts to develop comprehensive educational programs and activities for Virginia's School age children to help them better understand our rich transportation heritage. We presently have an excellent third grade program for school children, but we need additional resources to build programs which will reach a broader spectrum of students in our Valley, and the Commonwealth. We would like to create more hands-on exhibits which interpret the principles of motion, physics, and mechanical engineering and we want to offer specific workshops to demonstrate these principles. An Outreach Program would allow the Museum to better prepare students for their visit to our facility as well as allow us to provide historical programs in a more educational setting. Federal Employer Identification Number: 54-1027436 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 ~ (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. Agency Profile Full Official Name and Location: Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. #926 Roy E. Bucher, Jr. President Katherine F. Houck Executive Director 303 Norfolk Ave. Roanoke, VA 24016 Agency overview 1. History: Founded in 1963 as the Roanoke Transportation Museum, Inc. the Museum has enjoyed a quarter century of sustained growth evolving as one of the most significant and well preserved transportation collections in North America. The Museum's purpose is to preserve and interpret the transportation heritage of the Commonwealth by collecting, restoring and exhibiting significant artifacts in order to serve and educate the citizens of Virginia. In 1983, the Roanoke Transportation Museum was designated by House Joint Resolution 14 as the Official Transportation Museum of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Its name was changed in 1985 to reflect this designation. Despite a devastating flood in 1985, the Museum has made a remarkable recovery at its new location in downtown Roanoke. 2. Organization Summary: The Museum is a private, 501(C)(3), not-for-profit corporation governed by a thirty-one (31) member Board of Directors. Daily operational management of the Museum is provided by a salaried Executive Director. There are three paid, full-time staff members and one part-time staff member. The functional divisions in the organizational structure are as follows: Administration - planning, fiscal and personnel management Public Relations - advertising, visitor development and sales Education/Programs - curricular development, school interface, membership and volunteer development, calendar of events Collections - accession, cataloging, loans, and 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE conservation Exhibits - design and construction Maintenance - general upkeep and improvements to the physical plant Each function is managed by a staff member and director responsible to the President of the Board of Directors and the Executive Director. The Board of Directors provides guidance and direction to the Executive Director who serves at the pleasure of the Board. With the help of facillitators from the R. B. Pamplin College of Business of Virginia Tech, the Executive Committee and Committee Chairmen of the Board of Directors as well as the Executive Director participated in a number of planning sessions during May and June, 1992 to create a strategic opportunity planning document for 1992 - 1993. At the Annual Meeting of the Board of Directors in October, 1992 Restated By-Laws were ratified to strengthen the Museum administratively. 3. Major Activities: The Museum preserves and interprets the transportation heritage of the Commonwealth by collecting, restoring and exhibiting significant artifacts in order to serve and educate the citizens of Virginia. The collection includes the most comprehensive display of diesel locomotives in the United States, automobiles, trucks, horse-drawn vehicles, airplanes and buses. The primary emphasis is rail transportation which is the significant focus of visitor interest and community identity. Within 18,000 square feet of indoor exhibit space and 2.3 acres of outdoor exhibit space, the Museum unfolds the story of Virginia transportation with a unique mix of hands-on exhibits, vintage collections, and the drama of main-line rail service which is the backdrop of the Museum's urban location. The Museum's exhibits and programs provide the social history of transportation and urbanization in the context of physical science principles involved in transportation technology. Programs and tours of the Museum are designed to meet both formal and informal educational objectives for all age groups. Periodic evaluations and discussions with area educators help refine Museum programs to meet curriculum objectives of participating school systems. An educational program designed by the Museum for third graders to correspond with their curriculum includes a teacher workbook, student hand-outs, and specially trained tour guides to augment the program. Furthermore, the Museum sponsors a springtime School Children's Steam Excursion normally pulled by the Class J 611, a steam locomotive owned by the City of Roanoke and leased by the Museum to the Norfolk Southern Corporation. Exhibit planning and construction have also incorporated ideas suggested by educators and visitors through a formal evaluation process. 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^Virginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE The Museum is a sponsor of the Roanoke Railway Festival which celebrates the Valley's rich rail heritage attracting 25,000 visitors. During this week-end festival in 1992, the Museum sponsored our annual Railfair, the largest model railroad and railroadianna show, in Western Virginia. Featured as well was a special railart exhibit and a pictorial exhibit with other activities going on in and around the Museum. The Museum is also one of the host sights for Roanoke's First Night, a nonalcoholic family celebration on New Year's Eve. Last year 8,500 Valley citizens attended the event. Community support in the way of voluntarism has made a strong impact on the Museum. Volunteers run our gift shop daily. A volunteer organization meets weekly to build a large model rail display of the state of Virginia. Volunteers also help man our ticket office, and a dedicated group of supporters are helping us organize our Resource Library. In a typical year, the Museum will welcome visitors from at least thirty-eight states and a dozen countries including Canada, United Kingdom, France, West Germany, Japan, Ireland, Spain, Israel, Scotland, Netherlands, Panama, Switzerland, and Australia. Serving a regional population of 755,000, the Museum has 58 school systems and a population of 1.2 million within a two (2) hour drive. Visitation figures have risen steadily in the last five years with over 40,000 visitors during 1992. Justification With County support in 1992, the Museum was able to make significant strides in becoming a Museum of first quality in programs, exhibits, and education. With the recent loss of state funding and the Recession, the Museum has cut its staff from nine to four persons. Not wanting to cut service to our visitors, the Museum's visiting hours have remained the same, but significant projects and collection restoration have been tabled for a later date. Continued support from Roanoke County for this year will enable the Museum to become a stronger educational and cultural resource in the Roanoke Valley supporting the Valley's efforts to avoid economic depression by placing a greater emphasis on our tourism resources. Now more than ever with recent announcements of over 2,500 jobs lost in our area we need County help to bring visitors to Western Virginia. This Museum, recognized as the official state transportation museum, represents the heritage of the Commonwealth and a promise of Virginia's future as a whole. Transportation was, and is, the key to the success of America's culture and economy. This Museum is unique among its peers from other states because its programs demonstrate not only the historical 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 ~ (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE significance of transportation but also the principles of physics, mechanical engineering, and sociology of transportation systems. With Roanoke County~s support, the Museum can advance its educational mission to further its efforts to collect, preserve, and interpret one of the most significant transportation collections in North America. Specifically, ae are asking for $10,000 in County funds to support our efforts to develop comprehensive educational programs and activities for Virgiaia~s school age children to help them better understand our rich transportation heritage. we presently have an excellent third grade program for school children, but we need additional resources to build programs which will reach a broader spectrum of students in the Commonwealth. We would like to create more hands-on exhibits which interpret the principles of motion, physics and mechanical engineering and we want to offer specific workshops to demonstrate these principles. An outreach Program would allow the Museum to better prepare students for their visit to our facility as well as allow us to provide historical programs in a more educational setting. Without Roanoke County support the Museum cannot continue to make the significant strides towards its goals to become an educational resource and premier historical attraction for the state of Virginia. Despite a devastating flood in 1985 that caused $1,000,000 in damage and the need to relocate, and despite the financial hardships the Museum has suffered since then, visitation has increased 50$ in the last two years and community commitment has never been stronger. Citizens want to know more about their transportation heritage and how the industrial revolution has affected their lives. Since the Museum is the designated state transportation museum, we want to meet the needs of the citizens of Virginia and can only reach our fullest potential with the help of Roanoke County. 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ~~i ^Virginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. OTHER INFORMATION 1. The legal status of our organization is: Not-For-Profit, IRS 501(C)(3) Corporation 2. Our Organization is NOT established by statute enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia. 3. Our organization does NOT receive state funds as a subgrantee of another state agency or through a state grant-in-aid program authorized by law. 4. 1963 was the date on which our organization began to do business in Virginia. 5. Our organization is exempt from taxation under applicable provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (please see attached). 6. Our organization is NOT a private institution of higher education nor is it affiliated with a private institution of higher education. 7. Our organization is NOT a religious organization nor is it affiliated with a religious organization. 8. The Executive Director is Katherine F. Houck, Executive Director Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. 303 Norfolk Ave. ~ :~ Roanoke, VA 24016 (703)342-5670 I hereby certify that the information provided herein is correct and accurate, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Person completing this Information: Katherine F. Houck, Executive Director Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. 303 Norfolk Ave. Roanoke, VA 24016 (703) 342-56~.0~ /ir Signature: Date : c~- 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 PREPARED ESPECIALLY FOR ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Valley Cor rv~ntion & V~.sitors Bureau April 27, 1993 Thf Roano Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau NOTICE The foregoing proposal has been submitted to the finance committee of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. It has not been approved by the full Board of Directors. Additionally, it does not reflect recommendations which will be presented by the commissioned Virginia Tech Study. These recommendations will be presented to our Board on April 28, 1993. It is anticipated that the figures in the budget you received will be adjusted to reflect Virginia Tech's recommendations and could change substantially. At your request, we will be glad to meet with you and review those changes. "Capital of the Blue Ridge" (703) 342-6025 Marketplace Center 114 Market Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1402 ,-- r. .. w.. .,, w .. rr rr ,.. I. ORGANIZATION ~. W r .~ w ... r. .. ~r ~. I1r ... ~. rr rr w r il. MARKETING, PROMOTIONS AND -- ADVERTISING Account #432 - Dues & Subscriptions IACVB - International Association of CVB's (Professional CVB Status) (Benefits) Information access to meetings, planners, scam alerts, ability to tap into lead system (Civet) CINET - Subscription Fee (with IACVB) (Benefits) for leads then you pay by the lead SVTA - Shenandoah Valley Travel Association Regional Tourism Association (Benefits) Leverage advertising dollars, participate in shows paid for by association memberships. Catherine is currently a board member. VACVB - State Convention Bureau Association (Benefits) Coordinated effort by state for trade- shows and trade development Co-op some tradeshows NTA - National Tour Association (Tour Operators) (Benefits) Can attend the Spring and Winter tradeshow to make contacts with tour operators VSAE - Virginia Society of Association Executives (Benefits) The association most Virginia meeting planners belong to, our #1 market RCMA - Religious Conference Managers Association (Benefits) Our #1 market of meeting planners outside of state meeting planners BRPA - Blue Ridge Parkway Association (Benefits) Tourism and Parkway development, key statistics, Catherine is currently Vice President Account #432 (page 2) Va. Travel Council - (Benefits) Lobbying efforts, Co-op advertising opportunities Brochure distribution SGMP - Society of Government Meeting Planners (not currently members of) (Benefits) more single property leads - government meeting planners NCBMP - National Congress of Black Meeting Planners New membership as of last fall (Benefits) to tap into targeted black associations Relly has currently booked 2 conventions since joining this association ABA - American Bus Association (not currently a member) (Benefits) Tour development, counterpart to NTA Charter companies targeted (other future tour associations to pick up - OMCA) Ontario Motorcoach Association Account #470 CONVENTION TRADE SHOWS - Affordable Meetings (new item) have been on two year waiting list Benefits single property convention leads Nat'l Coalition of Black Meeting Planners - new show as of last fall Benefits; to open new market segment with regard to regional meetings - RCMA - Benefits; our number one regional & national market Destination Showcase - Beaefit; our only DC tradeshow Regional meeting planners - Society of Government Meeting Planners - New program Benefits; single property and citywide convention leads Vir inia Societ of Association Executives - Benefits; planners association, our largest market TOURISM TRADE SHOWS National Tour Association - Benefits; National exposure with tour operators American Bus Association - New item, Benefits; National exposure with charter tour companies Canadian Sales Mission - Benefits; to pull Canadian traffic off of I-81 travelling south - Travel South - new program, Benefits; regional approach individual tourism within driving distance - Unscheduled Co-op trade shows as they become available i.e. Pennsylvania Bus or sales mission III. VIRGINIA TECH STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Virginia Tech is currently commissioned to do a one year, three year and five year comprehensive marketing plan for the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. The results of this will be in place by July 1, 1993. Additionally, a visitor profile study is underway (which will take one year to complete). This study will provide the necessary data to verify our advertising strategies as well as to provide us with the necessary statistical information needed to provide accurate Economic Impace information. Many hours have been spent, both with our board and our staff, evaluating and providing information imperative to streamlining our organization and improving our Marketing efforts. Our Board is confident that this activity will take our organization to the "Next Level" of growth and professional development. IV. BOARD INVOLVEMENT RKE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Mr. Richard Wells Mr. Gerald Carter Publisher General Manager Leisure Publishing Holiday Inn Tanglewood P.O. Box 21535 4368 Starkey Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24014 989-6138//Fax 989-7603 774-4400//Fax 774-1195 ((President)) ((Vice President)) Mr. Robert Archer General Manager Blue Ridge Beverage P.O. Box 700 Salem, VA 24153 380-2000//Fax 380-2546 ((Secretary)) Mr. E. C. Warren, III Owner/Manager The Roanoker Restaurant 2522 Colonial Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24015 344-7746//No Fax ((Treasurer)) Mr. Jim Hinson, Pres. First Virginia Bank P.O. Box 7585 Roanoke, VA 24019 561-8600//Fax 561-8688 ((Past President)) Mr. Brian Wishneff Rke City Economic Dev. 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 981-2715//Fax 981-2773 ((Executive Committee)) Mr. Tim Gubala Rke Co. Economic Dev. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 772-2069//Fax 772-2030 ((Executive Committee)) Mr. W. Robert Herbert City Manager of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 981-2333//Fax 981-2773 Mr. Elmer Hodge Rke Co. Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 772-2004//Fax 772-2030 Mr. John Lambert Owner John Lambert Associates 1010 Dominion Bank Bldg. Roanoke, VA 24010 982-1010//Fax 982-8392 Mr. Franklin Kimbrough Executive Director Downtown Roanoke, Inc. 310 First Street, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 342-2028//Fax 344-1452 Mr. Herman Turk General Manager Rke Airport Marriott 2801 Hershberger Rd, NW Roanoke, VA 24017 563-9300//Fax 366-5846 3/11/93 Board of Directors Page 2 Mr. Chuck Crowe Executive Director Smith Mtn. Lake Partnership 2 Bridgewater Plaza Moneta, VA 24121 721-.1203//Fax 703-721-4035 Dr. Michael Olsen Virginia Tech Wallace Hall, Rm 354 Dept of Hotel/Motel Mgmt. Blacksburg, VA 24061-0429 703-231-8425//Fax 703-231-7157 Mr. Jim Lindsey Blue Ridge Regional Business Journal 821 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24016-3627 985-0143//Fax 343-7845 Mr. Tom Wallace President Wallace Enterprises 325 Elm Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 345-3054//345-4824 Mr. John Poff, Sr. VP Krisch Hotels, Inc. P.O. Box 14100 Roanoke, VA 24022 342-4531//Fax 343-2864 Mr. John S. Edwards Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1179 Roanoke, VA 24033-3366 985-8625//Fax 345-7353 Mr. Delvis "Mac" McCadden Roanoke City Council 325 Noble Avenue, NE Roanoke, VA 24012 992-0243//No Fax Ms. Rindy Lionberger Lionberger Construction P.O. Box 20209 Roanoke, VA 24018 989-5301/ - 5354 Fax 989-5426 Mr. Granger Macfarlane Eastern Motor Inns P.O. Box 201 Roanoke, VA 24022 344-5531//Fax 343-5698 Mr. James G. Harvey, II Roanoke City Council 1904 Westover Ave., SW Roanoke, VA 24014 345-9416//No Fax Mr. Carey Harveycutter General Manager Salem Civic Center P.O. BOX 886 Salem, VA 24153 375-3004//Fax 375-4011 Dr. James Sears Executive Director Center in the Square One Market Square Roanoke, VA 24011 342-5700//Fax 224-1238 Mr. Tim Gubala is on our Executive Committee and Mr. Elmer Hodge is a Director on our Board. Both of these gentlemen have put in numerous hours of time and energy ensuring the facilitation of our goals and objectives. Tim Gubala chairs several sub-committees with detailed agendas and each sub- committee is task oriented. Mr. Hodge was a key instrument in helping to save an extremely important piece of business (The Commonwealth Games of Virginia) from leaving our area in 1992 - this was very critical to the economy of our Valley. Both of these gentlemen work hard and long to ensure the proper stewardship of Roanoke County's investment. Additionally, I would like to personally thank Mr. Lee Eddie. Week before last he was a major player in assisting us as we hosted The Crowe Dreambuilders. The 5000 person convention was in our valley, headquartered at the Salem Civic Center. Mr. Eddie assisted us as we hosted the top executives of this organization. Currently, we have a 95$ chance of having this group return in March of 1994! There are also various sub groups which are now considering our area as a result of our meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Roai ~~dc~` ~alleY i visitors Bureau VISTI'OR RESPONSES TO ADVEATLSTNG IN APRIL (NOT INCLUDING TELEPHONE RESPONSES) 1992 VA IS FOR LOVERS TRAVEL GUIDE - 43 (Zbtal for the year 4,018) 1993 VA IS FOR LOVERS TRAVEL GUIDE - 235 (Zbtal for the year '704) 1993 VA IS FOR LOVERS SPRING INSERT -1,914 (Zbtal for the year) "Capital of the Blue Ridge" (703) 342-6025 Marketplace Center 114 Market Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1402 CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (CHIP) Fact Sheet Mission: The miss'~on of the Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP), is to promote the health of bw=income children through coordinaC~on of their medical care and strengthen their fam~ies through the effective coordination of community resources in a public private partnership. Purpose: The Child Health Investment Partnership in the Roanoke Valley is one of the effective models for providing comprehensive health care for children along with related family resource services. CHIP is a partnership between health departments, the private medical and dental community, the Community Action Agency and other public and private providers. The primary purpose of this program is to merge the private and public health resources to provide comprehensive health and related services to low-income children, birth through six (6) years of age from families with an income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level ($18,553 for a famly of four (4)) on enrollment and at or below 150% ($20,925 for a family of four (4)) at recertif'~catbn each year. Since the beginning of the program the upper age limit has been extended by one year so that an enrolled child does not lose CHIP eligbJity due to age. Presently, CHIP,s upper age limit is ten (10) years. Services: Through CHIP, private physicians provide a medical home for low=income chldren in the Roanoke Valley where preventive and acute care is accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week. ParC~cipating physicians are re'rnbursed at Medicaid rates. CHIP also coordinates dental, laboratory, and pharmacy services, and transportation to appointments when no other transportation is available. CHIP public health nurses provide case management, working with famiies to assess the children's medical needs and developing and following through on plans to meet those needs. Fam~y intervention special'~st, teamed with the publ'~c health nurses, provide family support services. They work with families to assess other needs such as housing, education and fuel assistance, and to develop and anplement plans to meet those needs. Working from the Head Start ph~osophy that the parent is the child's first and most important teacher, CHIP staff members provide materials, activities and parent meetings to strengthen the parent's ability to encourage their chJdreri s growth and development. Service Area: CHIP serves the chJdren in the cities of Roanoke and Salem, and in the counties of Roanoke, Craig and Botetourt, in the state of Virginia. History: CHIP ~ a non-profit agency founded in 1988 by a local pediatrician, Dr. Douglas Pierce and a local businessman, Cabell Brand. Enrol4nent: 1,050 children are currently enrolled. CHIP Or TIIE ROANOKE VALLEY ACCOMPLISHMENT S * 1067 children are enrolled in CIIIP as of 3/18/93 * 600 families are being served by CHIP as of 3/18/93 * 90% of CHIP children have received age appropriate well child exams * 99.6% of all CHIP children fully immunized for age * 91% of children less than 2 years have completed the basic immunization series * 85% of CHIP children greater than age 3 have received dental exams * 99% of CHIP children have attained appropriate weight for height * 22 parents have received their GI/D's using either CHIP funding or other Comm un it.y funding since fall 1990 * 16 parents have completed post-secondary education/training progran~s since fall 199 (including business/computer training, nursing assistanULPN training, etc.) * 8 parents have completed CPR training * 45 of the 55 smoke detectors donated by the Safe Kids coalition in December 1992 have been distributed along with home safety educational materials * 370 educational home visits have been provided to CIIIP families by family intervention specialists since April, 1992. * 6 families have moved to their own IIabitat for I-Iumanity homes 6 parents have received their drivers licenses using either CHIP funds or other community funding * 8 CIIIl' nurses, 1 Family Intervention Specialist and the Parent Involvement Specialise have been NCAST certified, additionally one of the nurses is an NCAST instructor * 7 Family Intervention Specialists have been certified in administering the IIOMI/ Sc~tlu for use in assessing Family strengths CINDY PINKSTDN/Statt Dr. John Davis uses a toothy Kermit the Frog to help explain to Alex Wertz, 3, whet will happen during his dental checkup. ' Program, chips in to solve medical; social, roblems . p ~ _.. By MIKE HUDSON and DOUGLAS PARDUE' STAFF N(W1EH,S "I'm 27;' Elizabeth Guthrie says. "Twenty-seven. -Feel 97. l feel like I'm just ~~/•r the oldest woman in the hills." She gave birth to her twins, Casey and' Cody, a year and half ago. They were three months premature, had lung and heat prob- lems, and Spent most of their first few weeks in intensive care. Guthrie, with three other children at her apartment at Jamestown Place housing proj- ect, found it almost impossible to get back and forth to Roanoke Memorial Hospital each day to be with the twins. She was over- . whelmcd. But CHIP, the Roanoke Valley's iaaova- live' medical program for children, began picking her up m its van and taking her to the hospital. CHIP arranged a meeting to give hospital workers an idea of her problems and to help Guthrie understand her babies' ai1- meats. After the twins same home, a CHIP nurse and outreach worker helped Guthrie get them into an infant stimulation program to make up for their slow development. Now CHIP is working with her as she appeals their cutoff liom Medicaid. Cody and Casey still weigh just I S pounds each, she says, but their health is PLEASE SEE CHIP/F5 U ~ v~ T3 O O ~+ ..~ -~ ..~ ., y., ~., U xi U cd ... wo„ ~ i..U ~ ~ ~U .~~o•~~oyo ~ ~ +~ ,., U G, v~ ' V 'C '~ cd s>. U ~ ~ U p~ r~~ O ~1, TS s.. O .~ O ~ U UO ~ +~.+ ,~ ~ L~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q x Qi ~ ~ ~' U Q ~" U V ~ Q b ~ N cd ~. ~ Q N ~ •~ •'~ o~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ •> U ~ o ,-. ~x c~~U., ~ ~ .'~ ~" U VDN p.0. Box 4642 Roanoke, VA 24015 April 6, 1993 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: I am writing to you on Voters of the Roanoke Area January 28, 1993. behalf of the League of Women in response to your letter of Since 1983 we have yearly compiled the information, arranged for the printing, and handled the distribution of "Facts for Voters throughout the valley. This year rocess of distributing 15,000 copies. we are in the p from During each of these years, we have received funding the local governments. For the 1993 edition of "Fac6alem for Voters", $275.00 was received from RoandkFranklin County. City, Roanoke County, Botetourt County, This money covers only the printing cost. Our distribution is as equal as possible in the five localities. This spring we have already given each locality 2,500 copies for the schools, registrars, and government offices in their area. We have also given 950 to the libraries in these areas. The remaining copies allow us too er~ment additional requests from area registrars and g offices. Also we are able to fill requests from many area organizations, businesses, and individuals. We thank you for your past support and hope that you will be able to fund Roanoke County's share of the printing cost again this year. We look forward to working with Roanoke County in the future. Sincerely yours, Phyllis Bailey Chairman of the Board LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE ROANOKE AREA I am Cherie B. Shindell, 3123-G Noneywood Lane - a long time resident of Roanoke County, and a member of the Roanoke Area League of ~ldomen Voters. ~"~'e received a letter from Rita R. Busher, flirector of Manage- ment and Budget, presumably a form leter, encouraging us, as an organization that has made a funding request for the FY1993-~ Budget, to attend this meeting. I have given each of you a copy of our reply, as well as a copy of this year's "Facts for Voters". Some years ago, because of the fragmented structure of the Valley's government, we felt there was a need for something similar to this booklet, so we contacted Roanoke City, Roanoke County, and Salem, and proposed that we would compile the in- formation and arrange for the printing and distribution if the governments involved would pay for the printing. They all agreed to thig arrangement. Since then Botetourt and Franklin Counties have asked to be included. V~~~hen the printer's bill is received, we divide it equally among the participating governments and notify them accordingly, These booklets have proved to be quite popular, seeming to fill a real need, so we hope the governments involved will wish to continue the arrangement - even though the compilation and distribution of them has grown to be quite a task for us. _ ~ O j j J j O j .i N m D ~ ~ co w j J J O J N DOLLARS (Thousands) i N (~H O - O O O O v ~ C p p O REMARKS BY TERRI LYNN CORNWELL, PH.D., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE ARTS COUNCIL OF THE BLUE RIDGE AT RDANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBL I C HEAR I IVG April 27, 1993 My name is Terri Cornwell, Executive Director of The Arts Council of the Blue Ridge, with offices located at Center in the Square in downtown Roanoke. As an organization of more than 75 individual cultural groups spanning the area from Blacksburg to Lynchburg to Lexington, we have been pleased to receive the support of various local governments including Roanoke and Botetourt counties, as well as the cities of Roanoke and Salem. We thank you for past funding and hope that, this coming year, you will continue to support our wide-ranging programs. Since 1976, The Arts Council has served as a clearinghouse for cultural information, a resource for individual artists and cultural groups, and a leader in arts advocacy. Our regular programs include: Center Scholars, a scholarship program for high school . students to work with professional artists. This year's class included students from Cave Spring> William Byrd, Glenvar, and North Cross high schools. The annual City Art Show, now in its 14th year, and the only . juried shoov for area artists from the cities and surrounding counties. This year's show has more than 13t~ entries. Brown Baq Arts, a free noontime concert series in the summer . featuring local performing artists and providing entertainment for all area residents who happen to venture downtown for any reason. Hut our most visible and most important program this year has been our coordination of "Blueprint 2000: A Cultural Plan for the Roanoke Region of Western Virginia." This project, initiated in 1991, involves a wide range of individuals from area cities, as well as the surrounding counties. More than 75 individuals have been serving on task forces to examine such issues as funding, economic impact, diversity, arts education, and areas of mutual support to create the first comprehensive cultural plan for the region. Of particular benefit to Roanoke County are the aspects of the Blueprint which deal with economic development and quality of life. By mid-May all eight task force reports will be complete and a draft document will be circulated among the cultural organizations for approval. The Arts Council will be .assisting with the implementation of many of the recommendations in the Blueprint and support from local governments is vital, if the plan is to be successful. Tentative recommendations of interest to Roanoke County include expansion of arts education programs, particularly those providing outreach to area schools; creation of an Arts Education Coalition of educators and artists to better coordinate information on current programs and to advocate more support from the State for arts education; and joint projects with the tour-ism community to improve the marketing of the area's outstanding cultural offerings. Finally, I would like to mention a special program 2 instituted this year by The Arts Council. We have made a commitment to increasing access to our programs for disabled individuals. To our knowledge, we are one of the first cultural groups to employ on a regular basis a sight-impaired individual, who happens to be a resident of Roanoke County. We would very much like to expand this program, but, because of limited funding, we have been unable to do so. Increased support from Roanoke County would help us strengthen our commitment to this important segment of our population. Once again, thank you for your past support, and we hope you will join us this coming year as we attempt to strengthen our current programs and begin implementation of Blueprint 2000. 3 2 4~O U A VISION FOR THE CULTURAL COMMUNITY OF THE ROANOKE REGION OF WESTERN VIRGINIA Blueprint P000 Timetable Winter, 1991 Major Cultural Organizations Request Arts Council to Coordinate Cultural Plan Spring, 1991 Steering Committee Organized Summer, 1991 Blueprint Planning Process & Research Agenda Organized Fall, 1991 Research Begins Winter, Spring 1992 Surveys Conducted Summer, 1992 Focus Groups Held Research Analyzed Fall, 1992 TasE: Forces Organized Winter, 1.993 Task Forces Conduct Additional Research Spring, 1993 Task Force Reports Drafted Blueprint Drafted Approval Process Begins Summer, 1993 Final Blueprint Published Blueprint Distributed to Business, Govt., Community Groups Planning for Implementation Begins Fall, 1993 Implementation Begins ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Appropriation Request Agency: Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. Requested County Appropriation for 1993-1994 - $10,000 In the 1993 Fiscal Year the Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. respectfully requests county funding in the amount of $10,000 to support our efforts to develop comprehensive educational programs and activities for Virginia's School age children to help them better understand our rich transportation heritage. We presently have an excellent third grade program for school children, but we need additional resources to build programs which will reach a broader spectrum of students in our Valley, and the Commonwealth. We would like to create more hands-on exhibits which interpret the principles of motion, physics, and mechanical engineering and we want to offer specific workshops to demonstrate these principles. An Outreach Program would allow the Museum to better prepare students for their visit to our facility as well as allow us to provide historical programs in a more educational setting. Federal Employer Identification Number: 54-1027436 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V ir~inia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. Agency Profile Full Official Name and Location: Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. #926 Roy E. Bucher, Jr. President Katherine F. Houck Executive Director 303 Norfolk Ave. Roanoke, VA 24016 Agency overview 1. History: Founded in 1963 as the Roanoke Transportation Museum, Inc. the Museum has enjoyed a quarter century of sustained growth evolving as one of the most significant and well preserved transportation collections in North America. The Museum's purpose is to preserve and interpret the transportation heritage of the Commonwealth by collecting, restoring and exhibiting significant artifacts in order to serve and educate the citizens of Virginia. In 1983, the Roanoke Transportation Museum was designated by House Joint Resolution 14 as the Official Transportation Museum of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Its name was changed in 1985 to reflect this designation. Despite a devastating flood in 1985, the Museum has made a remarkable recovery at its new location in downtown Roanoke. 2. Organization Summary: The Museum is a private, 501(C)(3), not-for-profit corporation governed by a thirty-one (31) member Board of Directors. Daily operational management of the Museum is provided by a salaried Executive Director. There are three paid, full-time staff members and one part-time staff member. The functional divisions in the organizational structure are as follows: Administration - planning, fiscal and personnel management Public Relations - advertising, visitor development and sales Education/Programs - curricular development, school interface, membership and volunteer development, calendar of events Collections - accession, cataloging, loans, and 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE conservation Exhibits - design and construction Maintenance - general upkeep and improvements to the physical plant Each function is managed by a staff member and director responsible to the President of the Board of Directors and the Executive Director. The Board of Directors provides guidance and direction to the Executive Director who serves at the pleasure of the Board. With the help of facillitators from the R. B. Pamplin College of Business of Virginia Tech, the Executive Committee and Committee Chairmen of the Board of Directors as well as the Executive Director participated in a number of planning sessions during May and June, 1992 to create a strategic opportunity planning document for 1992 - 1993. At the Annual Meeting of the Board of Directors in October, 1992 Restated By-Laws were ratified to strengthen the Museum administratively. 3. Major Activities: The Museum preserves and interprets the transportation heritage of the Commonwealth by collecting, restoring and exhibiting significant artifacts in order to serve and educate the citizens of Virginia. The collection includes the most comprehensive display of diesel locomotives in the United States, automobiles, trucks, horse-drawn vehicles, airplanes and buses. The primary emphasis is rail transportation which is the significant focus of visitor interest and community identity. Within 18,000 square feet of indoor exhibit space and 2.3 acres of outdoor exhibit space, the Museum unfolds the story of Virginia transportation with a unique mix of hands-on exhibits, vintage collections, and the drama of main-line rail service which is the backdrop of the Museum's urban location. The Museum's exhibits and programs provide the social history of transportation and -' urbanization in the context of physical science principles involved in transportation technology. Programs and tours of the Museum are designed to meet both formal and informal educational objectives for all age groups. Periodic evaluations and discussions with area educators help refine Museum programs to meet curriculum objectives of participating school systems. An educational program designed by the Museum for third graders to correspond with their curriculum includes a teacher workbook, student hand-outs, and specially trained tour guides to augment the program. Furthermore, the Museum sponsors a springtime School Children's Steam Excursion normally pulled by the Class J 611, a steam locomotive owned by the City of Roanoke and leased by the Museum to the Norfolk Southern Corporation. Exhibit planning and construction have also incorporated ideas suggested by educators and visitors through a formal evaluation process. 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE The Museum is a sponsor of the Roanoke Railway Festival which celebrates the Valley's rich rail heritage attracting 25,000 visitors. During this week-end festival in 1992, the Museum sponsored our annual Railfair, the largest model railroad and railroadianna show, in Western Virginia. Featured as well was a special railart exhibit and a pictorial exhibit with other activities going on in and around the Museum. The Museum is also one of the host sights for Roanoke's First Night, a nonalcoholic family celebration on New Year's Eve. Last year 8,500 Valley citizens attended the event. Community support in the way of voluntarism has made a strong impact on the Museum. Volunteers run our gift shop daily. A volunteer organization meets weekly to build a large model rail display of the state of Virginia. Volunteers also help man our ticket office, and a dedicated group of supporters are helping us organize our Resource Library. In a typical year, the Museum will welcome visitors from at least thirty-eight states and a dozen countries including Canada, United Kingdom, France, West Germany, Japan, Ireland, Spain, Israel, Scotland, Netherlands, Panama, Switzerland, and Australia. Serving a regional population of 755,000, the Museum has 58 school systems and a population of 1.2 million within a two (2) hour drive. Visitation figures have risen steadily in the last five years with over 40,000 visitors during 1992. Justification With County support in 1992, the Museum was able to make significant strides in becoming a Museum of first quality in programs, exhibits, and education. With the recent loss of state funding and the Recession, the Museum has cut its staff from nine to four persons. Not wanting to cut service to our visitors, the Museum's visiting hours have remained the same, but significant projects and collection restoration have been tabled for a later date. Continued support from Roanoke County for this year will enable the Museum to become a stronger educational and cultural resource in the Roanoke Valley supporting the Valley's efforts to avoid economic depression by placing a greater emphasis on our tourism resources. Now more than ever with recent announcements of over 2,500 jobs lost in our area we need County help to bring visitors to Western Virginia. This Museum, recognized as the official state transportation museum, represents the heritage of the Commonwealth and a promise of Virginia's future as a whole. Transportation was, and is, the key to the success of America's culture and economy. This Museum is unique among its peers from other states because its programs demonstrate not only the historical 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE significance of transportation but also the principles of physics, mechanical engineering, and sociology of transportation systems. With Roanoke County's support, the Museum can advance its educational mission to further its efforts to collect, preserve, and interpret one of the most significant transportation collections in North America. Specifically, we are asking for $10,000 in County funds to support our efforts to develop comprehensive educational programs and activities for Virginia's school age children to help them better understand our rich transportation heritage. We presently have an excellent third grade program for school children, but we need additional resources to build programs which will reach a broader spectrum of students in the Commonwealth. We would like to create more hands-on exhibits which interpret the principles of motion, physics and mechanical engineering and we want to offer specific workshops to demonstrate these principles. An Outreach Program would allow the Museum to better prepare students for their visit to our facility as well as allow us to provide historical programs in a more educational setting. Without Roanoke County support the Museum cannot continue to make the significant strides towards its goals to become an educational resource and premier historical attraction for the state of Virginia. Despite a devastating flood in 1985 that caused $1,000,000 in damage and the need to relocate, and despite the financial hardships the Museum has suffered since then, visitation has increased 50$ in the last two years and community commitment has never been stronger. Citizens want to know more about their transportation heritage and how the industrial revolution has affected their lives. Since the Museum is the designated state transportation museum, we want to meet the needs of the citizens of Virginia and can only reach our fullest potential with the help of Roanoke County. 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 ^V irginia ^ Museum ^ Of ^Transportation ^ Inc.^ ROANOKE Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. OTHER INFORMATION 1. The legal status of our organization is: Not-For-Profit, IRS 501(C)(3) Corporation 2. Our Organization is NOT established by statute enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia. 3. Our organization does NOT receive state funds as a subgrantee of another state agency or through a state grant-in-aid program authorized by law. 4. 1963 was the date on which our organization began to do business in Virginia. 5. Our organization is exempt from taxation under applicable provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (please see attached). 6. Our organization is NOT a private institution of higher education nor is it affiliated with a private institution of higher education. 7. Our organization is NOT a religious organization nor is it affiliated with a religious organization. 8. The Executive Director is Katherine F. Houck, Executive Director Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. 303 Norfolk Ave. ~ ` _ Roanoke, VA 24016 (703)342-5670 I hereby certify that the information provided herein is correct and accurate, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Person completing this Information: Katherine F. Houck, Executive Director Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. 303 Norfolk Ave. Roanoke, VA 24016 (703) 342-56~.0~ ~,~;- Signature: Date : ~- ~ 303 NORFOLK AVENUE • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 • (703) 342-5670 CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (CHIP) Fact Sheet Mission: The miss'~on of the Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP), is to promote the health of low-income children through coordination of their medical care and strengthen their families through the effective coordination of community resources in a public/private partnership. Purpose: The Chid Health Investment Partnership in the Roanoke Valley is one of the effective models for providing comprehensive health care for children along with related family resource services. CHIP is a partnership between health departments, the private medical and dental community, the Community Action Agency and other public and private providers. The primary purpose of this program is to merge the private and public health resources to provide comprehensive health and related services to low-income children, birth through six (6) years of age from fam~ies with an income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level ($18,553 for a family of four (4)) on enrollment and at or below 150% ($20,925 for a family of four (4)) at recertif'~cation each year. Since the beginning of the program the upper age limit has been extended by one year so that an enrolled child does not bse CHIP eligibility due to age. Presently, CHIP,s upper age limit is ten (10) years. Services: Through CHIP, private physicians provide a medical home for low-income children in the Roanoke Valley where preventive and acute care is accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Participating physicians are rernbursed at Medicaid rates. CHIP also coordinates dental, laboratory, and pharmacy services, and transportation to appointments when no other transportaton is available. CHIP publ'~c health nurses provide case management, working with famJies to assess the childrer s medical needs and developing and following through on plans to meet those needs. FamJy intervention special'~st, teamed with the public health nurses, provide family support services. They work with fam~ies to assess other needs such as housing, education and fuel assistance, and to develop and rnplement plans to meet those needs. Working from the Head Start philosophy that the parent is the child's first and most important teacher, CHIP staff members provide mater'~als, activities and parent meetings to strengthen the parent's ability to encourage their chJdreri s growth and development. Service Area: CHIP serves the children in the cities of Roanoke and Salem, and in the counties of Roanoke, Craig and Botetourt, in the state of Virginia. History: CHIP is anon-profit agency founded in 1988 by a bcal pediatrician, Dr. Douglas Pierce and a bcal businessman, Caber Brand. Enrollment: 1,050 children are currently enro~ed CHIP OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS * 1067 children are enrolled in CIIIP as of 3/18/93 * 600 families are being served by CHIP as of 3/18/93 * 90% of CHIP children have received age appropriate well child exams * 99.6% of all CHIP children fully immunized for age * 91% of children less than 2 years have completed the basic immunization series * 85% of CHIP children greater than age 3 have received dental exams * 99% of CHIP children have attained appropriate weight for height * 22 parents have received their GED's using either CH IP funding or other Community funding since fall 1990 * 16 parents have completed post-secondary education/training programs since fall 199 (including business/computer training, nursing assistanULPN training, etc.) * 8 parents have completed CPR training * 45 of the 55 smoke detectors donated by the Safe Kids coalition in December 1992 have been distributed along with home safety educational materials * 370 educational home visits have been provided to CIIIP families by fancily intervention specialists since April, 1992. * 6 families have moved to their own IIabitat for I-Iumanity homes * 6 parents have received their drivers licenses using either CHIP funds or other community funding * 8 CIIIl' nurses, 1 Family Intervention Specialist and the Parent Involvement Speciali~l have been NCAST certified, additionally one of the nurses is an NCAST instructor * 7 Family Intervention Specialists have been certified in administering the HOME scc~lu for use in assessing family strengths • CINDY PINKSTON/Staft Dr. John Davis uses a toothy Kermit the Frog to help explain to Alex Wertz, 3, what will happen during his dental checkup. Program, chips in to solve medical; •~ocial• roblems . p .~-~. By MIKE HUDSON and DOUGLAS PAfiDUE ST~fF V~W1ER$ ~ • "1'm 27," Elizabeth Guthrie says. "Twenty-seven. Feel ~97, l feel like I'm just ~~1 the oldest woman in the hills." She gave birth to her twins, Casey and' Cody, a year and half aggo. They were three months premature, had luny and heatt prob- lems, and spent most of their first few weeks in intensive care. Guthrie, with three other children at her apanment at Jamestown Place housing proj- ect, fouttct it almost impossible to get back and I'or[h to Roanoke Memonal hospital each day to be with the twins. She was over- . whclmcd. But CHIP, the Roanoke Valley's ianova- tive medical program for children, began picking her up in ils van and taking her to the hospital. CHIP arranged a meeting to give hospital workersrn idea of her problems and to help Guthrie understand her babies' ail- ments. After the twins came home, a CHIP nurse and outreach worker helped Guthrie get them into an infant stimulation program to make up for their slow development. Now CHIP is working with her as she appeals their cutolf from Medicaid. Cody and Casey still weigh just 1 B pounds each, she says, but their health is PLEASE SEE CHIP/F5 ^ ^ ^ v~ (~ ~ (~ ~r y e-r A~ CJ 'C3 r~j~' O ~ n O c~~~~' ~'~ fed' ~~~'o~'coY ~~ CD•.~ mow. 'v a ~ ~ ~ C C C~ ~ Q. ~ n c~ va n n• ,~ n ~. ~. ~, `~ n ~ ~ ~• ~ y ~ ~ ~' ~ n ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ pro. .~ ~ ~ ~~~ ?~ b~~~~.~ y ono ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ fD fD ~ ~'* C ~t A~ .r• ~~ ~ ~.,, ~- CCD ~ ~ `G ~ L 1 p ~ O ~ ~ ~ ... ~. '~'~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ . . ~~,. .. ~~~~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO GILES M. GILLEY TO EBPAND AN INDOOR ARCHERY CLIIB BY THE CONSTRIICTION OF AN ADDI- TION TO ITS FACILITY LOCATED ON TIMBERVIEW ROAD (TAB PARCELS 25.00-1-4 AND 25.00-1-1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Giles M. Gilley has filed a petition to exand an indoor archery club by the construction of an addition to its facility located on property owned by Sherwood Archers, Inc. on Timberview Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to expand an indoor archery club by the construction of an addition as set out in the Application for Special Use dated February 19, 1993, is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Giles M. Gilley to expand the indoor archery club by the construc- tion of said addition, said club being located on property owned by 1 Sherwood Archers, Inc. on Timberview Road in the Catawba Magisteri- al District. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~YZ ~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 D Gv- ~ -_ Gy ai a,u~~•t • r Sate P/L Id f -1-I~ I' •4~~ 12 \ 9150 Pc ~~ ~' f~,r'MAI~/D~ie D~ l~Zi Op~2TI~.S 1:, 1 b zslo>dm 29934< ICl \ ~\ 9 \ :a 9~„ac lrl ~ •4269 kICI B I 1826~6c I\ 1 / 47 12 CAc rY`~ 1 See Map 25.04 \ 1 , ' \ /F i - \ // \\ \\ ~\ \ 2' ~ 5 \ f\a.: . \~ _• \ \ \ ` \ ~ 31 ~ 10 004 6 \ 2015 4c ~~ 1 a e6 t~ a\ 52 p0 29 44 Cr 101 _/~ \-. 3i Si=c ICI / ), See Mao 2603 /Y(/ 0\ 1' • 200' I \ 1 \ .21• ~~. 2 ~ ~'~ `\. ,~ I \I1 I I \ See Map 2504 / \ 1•• zw' ~~ See MoD 2617 . ~ 111 ~ I' • 100' ,O~ Set MoD 2520 ~ 1••100' „_ 4336 nc ~a to o<~ S. "B\ IT Set Map 36.07 1'•100 ~` a~~" + DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~l CES NI • ~'/L ~ EY ~S'f~F~i~/ooD ~~PCNE~S rM ~ ,25. oo - /- ~ ,ZS oo - /- I AND ZONING SPEC/AL USF PE~2Nl/r sHooT/~!C ,~A~~E ele y w W _/ PETITIONER: GILES GILLEY CASE NUMBER: 6-4/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 6, 1993. Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Giles M. Gilley for a Special Use Permit to expand an indoor archery club to construct an addition, located on Timberview Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Virgil Garst expressed concern with increased traffic on the narrow access road; late hours of operation; and possible depreciation of property. Sandra Garst stated that this is one of the largest undeveloped areas in north county and it should remain in its natural state. John Cosgrove said that he has been good neighbors with the archery club for over 13 years. He said there have been occasions when he has been bothered by the public address system. He expressed concern that an expansion of the facility could increase traffic and trash that is left on the roadside. He asked how the sanitary waste disposal will be handled. Mr. Gilley responded that portable johns are brought in for the large state meets. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the number of members. Mr. Gilley said there are approximately 125 to 175 members. The average attendance during the winter is 35 to 55 members and 25 to 35 members during the summer. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other ,- ~,_-_ ,, Terrance Harrington, cretary Roanoke County Planning Commission (,V- ~ County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP ~~+`, Director of Planning DATE: April 6, 1993 RE: Use and Membership Characteristics; Sherwood Archers The archery club currently has approximately 175 members. Typical weekend usage of the facilities during warm weather is approximately 35 members at a time. The property is also used on weekdays and weekday evenings by a smaller number of members. Evening leagues are held during the warm weather months. The club also hosts statewide "meets"; typically 2 per year. These events are awarded to the club on a competitive bid basis. A maximum of 3 "meets" could be held during any given year. These events may be attended by a maximum of approximately 250 people. G~-I STAFF REPORT PART I B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of Giles M._ Gilley, representing Sherwood Archers Inc. for a special use permit (SUP) to allow the expansion of an existing building currently used as an indoor archery range. The expansion involves the 'addition of a 1300 square foot "greatroom" and associated restroom facilities. The room addition will permit the club to have an indoor meeting area for members and their guests. Currently the club has no indoor restroom facilities. Sherwood Archers is a private membership archery club located on Timberview Road approximately two miles from Route 311, in the Catawba Magisterial District. The club is situated on approximately 89 acres located on both sides of Timberview Road, with most of the property is lying north of the road. Current development on the property consists of the indoor range building, several small accessory buildings, and a gravel/cinder parking area. The majority bf the property is devoted to a series of outdoor archery courses that "weave" throughout the 89 acres. The courses lie on both sides of the road. [Note: Information on club membership levels and characteristics of club usage are not available at the time of the preparation of this report. Based upon preliminary discussions; the staff believes that usage of the club is primarily on weekends, and that periodic regional "meets" are held at the club. The staff will compile this information prior to your worksession on April 6th.] C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The property is zoned AG-3. Sherwood Archers is classified as a Shooting Range, Outdoor" in the zoning ordinance. These use t „es are allowed b s ecial use in the AG-3 district. A SUP is yp Y P required prior to any expansion of the use. If approved,' a site plan will need to be submitted and approved prior to commencing construction on the addition. A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY G1-I PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Topogra~hy and Vegetation The majority of the property lies on the south side of Brushy Mountain, with the terrain rising from Timberview Road. The property is heavily forested except for the developed areas, and the APCO R/W that traverses the property. Existing Development As stated above, existing development on the property is limited to an existing 2800 square foot indoor archery range, several small accessory buildings, a gravel parking area, and a series of outdoor archery courses on both sides of Timberview. This development exists within a forested area; clearing has been limited to that necessary for development. Access and Circulation Access to~the property is limited to Timberview Road. This "dead-end" secondary route has a pavement width of approximately 12-16 feet, with a series of sharp vertical and horizontal curves. No recent traffic counts are available for this route, however, County tax records indicate 48 residences along Timberview, a majority of which appear to be located east of the entrance to the property With an ADT of 7-10 trips per unit, residential traffic on this route should be in the range of 336-448 trips per day. The site is served by a single gravel entrance. Sight distances at the entrance to Timberview appear to be adequate. The existing gravel and cinder parking area has not been engineered in its design or construction. Surrounding Neighborhood The Timberview Road area is characterized by large lot and widely scattered single 'family residential development. The closest home is approximately 300 feet from a property line of the property. This home s~,ts on a ridge overlooking the property, and is visible from the proposed building site. Public Utilities There are no public utilities in this area of the county. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed construction is a minor addition to an existing structure. It will allow existing club members an indoor area for meetings and banquet-type events. Although the improvement to the building might make the club facilities more attractive to potential members, the addition is not for. the purpose of initiating new activities or functions that will significantly alter the existing use characteristics of the site. 3 C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is located in a Rural Preserve designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Outdoor recreation uses have a high compatibility in Rural Preserve areas, and their location in these areas is strongly encouraged. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Site plan review will be required. to ascertain conformance with County development standards. The Use and Design Standards for outdoor shooting ranges pertain to items such as fencing and signage. Since this request does not involve modifications to the outdoor ranges, it is my opinion ghat full compliance with these standards is not warranted. '~ PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The Sherwood Archers facility is an outdoor recreation use that is highly compatible with Rural Preserve areas. The proposed addition to the current facility is a minor addition that will not negatively impact surrounding properties in the area. PREPARED BY: ` ~~ DATE: April 2, 1993 C~1 ROANOKE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE 1. Applicant's Name: GILES M. GILLEY PO BOX 13948 Address: ROANOKE VA 2 Property owner's name .~ Phone : 342-1831 Z i P'; ......24034 SHERWOOD ARCHERS INC. Address: TiMBERVIEW ROAD Phone: ROANOKE VA .. Zip : _ 24019 3. Location of Property:. TIMBERVIEW ROAD Size of property 89 :acres/~~'r. Size of proposed special exception use 4 . Tax Map # : 25.00-1-1, 4 Old Tax Map # : acres/sq.ft. 5. Zoning Classification: A 3 6. Magisterial District Location: CATAWBA 7. Existing Land Use: ARC 8. Proposed Special Use: EXPANSION OF INDOOR RANGE BUILDING• CONSTRUCTION OF GREAT ROOM 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: RURAL PRESERVE 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Value of Land Value of Proposed Buildings Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed 11. Check Completed Items: 82" x 11" plot plan X Consultation List of adjacent property owners X Letter of Application Filing ..fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" ,!. < $1, 875 Special Use Permit for sanitary _f ill _ FE81993 method garbage and; refuse site ~ RECEIVED ~ ~~ $40 11 other Special.~iirs Uses ~, gi.~6. DES ,. ., ---- 12. Date of Application: 13. Applicant's Signature ROANOKE, VIRGINIA February 5, 1993 ~ Mr. Terry Harrington, Director Roanoke County, Dept. of Planning & Zoning Dear Mr. Harrington: of the The purpose of this letter is to explain our planned building expansion, existing indoor range, at Sherwood Archery Club. The expansion will be 27ft in length X 48ft in width. It's constructbuilding be consistant with that of the existing, 36ft wide X 80ft long, (cinderblock, concrete floor and frame roof). reatroomtion will consist of: A) wens toilet, B) ladies toilet, C) storeroom and D) g A & B) the toilets, both wens and ladies, will have (1) commode and wash bason for the handicapped, and will be wheelchair accessible. C) the storeroom is for the safe keeping of club records and kitchen stock. D) the great room is for club meetings and a congregating area duringlaurround activities. It wlklin level and wille benwheelchair nd cess ble looking a p yg area. Entry is wa The addition will disturb less than 500 sq/ft of grassy area with the balance being a existing graveled parking area. We are on private well and seP he 'wbll be removed nand filled. (2) outside toilets. On completion of the addition t y On completion of the co~se ruresentw grade,b around the lperimeter~ of the new wide and tapered off to t p construction. The addition will be approximately 300ft from our closest property boundry. Sherwood Archer Club is located on 87 acres of private property, and is open to its members and invited guest. We thank you for your favorable consideration of our building expansion. Very truly yours, Sherwood Archers ~~ ~~~ Giles M ey Range Captain ~R ~~~ `` W~~ \\ ~~~` / \ ,~ -~ i~ h z d ::. - w z a ~ J Z ~ 0 ~ 2 Q ~ ~ f ~. Q - O .\ lX ~ \ ,Y ... ~ u Q a ~ .~ :; o ~ Q ., .- ....~. -. -. -~:: r _ \ , ~ 3 w .., z oc ~M .' Z 1 ~ ~ - ac~~ -- Iu ~ ~.~ ~ -- mi _U ' ' ~~ v ' ' 0 i ~. im" ~~ i .+_ _ `-I -- a~ N I ~ ~ - i ~ v ~ .. . 1 ~ ~ I i 1 1 _ ~ Q w-r 1 _ i ~ I C-ry e/ R.vn~Ae Wal 5/ie0 I P/0 1800-1-I I" •400' 12 9150 PC .. f~~ ~ ~. _A f~ir~MA1i~DER D~ Iii O ~s I II 10 29.IOic(Ol 29934< \ lGl I 9 1 sa 9oA~ml 42 69 Pc lCl ' \`\ 192674c l 1 / 47 12 lO4c ~Y1 1 see Map 25.04 I \1 1`•200 \ 1~ e l /f \ ~i ~~ 2 ~~ \ \ 5 f\t, _: ~\ ~` ~ Z. '~ ~ \.\ \ S.I IOOOdc 6 ~ .•~ 2013 Pc 1 1 >er•.r C..•• 6 T•n S 2 OP 29.16 Ac 101 ~~ ~ ~,: 3~99XICf 7 ~~~ 45564c sea Map 36.07 I" • 100 See MaD 26.03 1 ` • 200' z2u nc " ...~ 3_, :~ I See Map 25.04 / \ • 200' I ` • w ~y ~ see Mav 26 I7 `` I"•100' ~inl~ / '~ See MaD 25.20 I"• 100 0~. ' e~ .jo ~\ DcF ~ . L ~ - 0.O4" +~ DEPAR'I'NIENT OF PLANNING 4/DES Nf • l'/L L~•Y ~S'f~F~INOOD ~~CHE~S rr~1 ~ 25. oo - /- ~ , ,ZS oo - ~ - ~ AND ZONING SPECIAL USF ~E~2kl/T' ~. ,?-. ,,, sfIDOT/~~ ~A~~E w-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO GILES M. GILLEY TO EXPAND AN INDOOR ARCHERY CLUB BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO ITS FACILITY LOCATED ON TIMBERVIEW ROAD (TAX PARCELS 25.00-1-4 AND 25.00-1-1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Giles M. Gilley has filed a petition to exand an indoor archery club by the construction of an addition to its facility located on property owned by Sherwood Archers, Inc. on Timberview Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to expand an indoor archery club by the construction of an addition as set out in the Application for Special Use dated February 19, 1993, is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Giles M. Gilley to expand the indoor archery club by the construc- tion of said addition, said club being located on property owned by 1 ~j_ i Sherwood Archers, Inc. on Timberview Road in the Catawba Magisteri- al District. c:\wp5]\agenda\zoningVhenvood ll I I I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ _ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE CE REQUEST ` __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SVD.jECT:~~.=.-L l_ \ `~` `~c'lZri~\\\ `~C jillvr~±,;.~~ ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ~_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time 1-mit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK r _ - - mlllllllltltlillillllllllllllllllllllillll 11 lllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllilliillilllllillllllllllllllliillillllllllllllllllll~"! fi i AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.75-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 1701 IINDERHILL AVENIIE (TAB MAP NOS. 70.11-1-2 AND 70.11-1-3) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 27, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.75 acres, more or less, as described herein, and located at 1701 Underhill Avenue, (Tax Map Numbers 70.11-1-2 and 70.11-1-3) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-2, Single-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: ~~ BEING the same property conveyed by Danny Ray Wise and Deborah S. Wise, husband and wife, to William C. Burleson and Janet C. Bost by deed dated March 19, 1993, of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1396 at page 632 with an attached plat of the property prepared by C. E. Lacy, Jr., Land Surveyor, dated March 17, 1993. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: -~r~a-~-~.~ ~ • C~-C--e-~-- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ..., ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ \\ 8 ' \ ~M~1~11n~4 ~oP~'~2Ti~s ~'_ITY ,nc _ o ao,~ t ~A~IoKE Ca. ~L.AIUNUl1 ~' CoM~t/t/SS/o~/ DEPAR'I'NIENT OF PLANNING T-~„ l .# 70. // . / _ Z ~ 'JO.-~~- / ^.3 Z' '` n AND ZONING ~, ~EZO~//~/Cr ,?.. ~,~ .Z 2 To T~2 '~. 7J`r ~GPES ~-a PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 7/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 6, 1993 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone 4.75 acres from I-2 to R-2, located at 1701 Underhill Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Bill Burleson who purchased the property said that he has no intentions of subdividing the property. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: -Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other - ,.~ Terrance Harringto ecretary Roanoke .County Planning Commission ~-a STAFF REPORT Petition: Roanoke County Planning Commission (Wise) File #: 7-4/93 PART I B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission, on behalf of Danny Ray and Deborah Wise, to rezone 4.75 acres located at 1701 Underhill Avenue from I-2 Industrial to R-2 Residential. The property contains two parcels of 4.56 and 0.19 acres respectively and is currently occupied by a single family residence. The property is currently under a contract of sale, but due to the non-conforming status of the residence, the purchaser has been unable to obtain acceptable financing. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS As the property is now zoned, the single family residence is anon-conforming use. Under Section 30-23 of the zoning ordinance, any expansion or enlargement of the residential structure or use, including accessory buildings, is prohibited. Further, if the existing structure is damaged or destroyed in excess of 50 percent of the replacement cost, the dwelling can not be reconstructed. While the current I-2 zoning permits a wide range of more intensive industrial uses, residential uses are prohibited. The proposed R-2 zoning would permit single and two family residences by right, as well as a range of institutional uses. A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petition: Roanoke County Planning Commission (Wise) File #: 7-4/93 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The property in question is located just east of the Roanoke City/County boundary on the south side of the Roanoke River at 1701 Underhill Ave. Tomography/Vegetation -The property is located on a ridge that rises as much as 100 feet above and extends northwestward into the sewage treatment plant :property. Except for the existing house site, the property is predominately wooded. Surrounding Neighborhood -This .property is surrounded on three sides by the Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatment Plant: With the exception of one pond/lagoon located northeast of the property, the treatment plant is located along the river at a much lower elevation than this property. The general area is a mixture of scattered residences along Underhill Ave., industrial uses in the G'ity and along 16th Street, and open space. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Development Potential -Under the present zoning the property has limited potential for intensive industrial development or use in any physical expansion of the treatment plant due to the terrain of the property. Although staff has informally been advised that the City may be interested in acquiring this property as a future buffer, no formal written comments have been received in response to this petition. Under the proposed zoning the property could be subdivided into five or six lots based on the minimum required lot size (32,670 sq. ft.) and frontage (90 ft.) with no public services. With both public sewer and water, which are located in the City on Underhill Avenue, approximately two to three times this number of lots could be created depending on terrain and configuration using the minimum lot and frontage requirements. Either development scenario would require submission and approval of detailed subdivision plans to insure conformance with all County ordinances and laws. At this time, no prospective development plan for the property has been submitted or discussed with staff. Impacts of Development -While the development of this property for residential use would have little impact on the surrounding community, full development of this property may cause friction with the operation of the sewage treatment plant. Also, any expansion of the treatment plant would require extensive screening and buffering (Type E, with a 50 foot buffer yard) should the property be rezoned, regardless of whether or not the property is developed in the future. Page 2 G1-~ Petition: Roanoke County Planning Commission (Wise) File #: 7-4/93 Discussion of Non-Conforming Status -The primary issue is the conflicting policies of the lending institutions and the land use issues attempting to be implemented through the County Zoning Ordinance. Many lending institutions will not finance a non- conforming residential use at favorable rates due to the potential risks, should the structure be substantially damaged or destroyed. This policy comes from guidelines established by Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and applies to all mortgages that may latter be resold on the secondary market. However, some lending institutions will approve financing for a nonconforming residence if they intend to hold the mortgage through the entire term, but at a rate generally higher than the prevailing rate. In contrast, zoning principles recognize the establishment of non-conforming uses as a method of allowing a use to continue "as is° and curtailing future investment in the particular use. This is done to promote or anticipate a change is the land use patterns in an area, with non-conforming uses generally viewed as potentially conflicting or undesirable uses in relationship to the change. As this fipplication illustrates, this pits a community's policy to promote a change in land use, against the financing options available to prospective buyers of property. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is located in the Rural Preserve land use category on the Comprehensive Plan Map. Located south of this property is an area which was designated Principal Industrial through a land use plan amendment approved in August, 1989. In undertaking the comprehensive zoning map revisions in 1992, the Commission revaluated this area in light of the 1989 plan amendment and adjoining uses in the City, and designated additional areas for industrial use, including the subject property. Unlike the other residences on Underhill Ave., which were zoned R-2, the Wise property was zoned I-2 because of its proximity to the treatment plant. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS This petition provides a classic example of the difficulties posed by non-conforming uses when new zoning provisions or maps are adopted. Most of these non- conforming uses are established intentionally in order to promote a greater public purpose, in this case to protect the treatment plant from potentially incompatible land uses on adjoining property. This is compounded by conflicting policies of lending institutions to deny financing for non-conforming uses. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: April 2, 1993 Page 3 ,~/~~i i ~~%,;~~ . ~" 7` ~'j Date Rec. ~~` ,.,r O~ Received By: Case No.: ' Ord. No. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Danny Ray & Deborah Wise Phone: Address: 1701 Underhill AV Roanoke, VA 2 . Applicant' s Name : Roanoke County Planning Commission Phone : 772-2068 Address : C/0 Roanoke Co Dept of Planning and Zoning P ~ Rex ~R00 RnkP _ vA__ 3. Location of Property: 1701 Underhill Tax Map Number(s) : 70.11-1-2,3 4. Magisterial District: Vinton 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: 4.75 acres I2 Industrial Existing Land Use: 7. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Preserve 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No ~ (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 1992 Assessment $71,500 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature ~,~~ -~ _ Date ~.//~ ~~~ County of Roanoke ~ Department of Planning and Zoning (/l~ Memorandum TO: Planning Commission _-'~~~ FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP DATE: February 19, 1993 RE: Rezoning Application: Wise Property; Underhill Ave. On behalf of the Commission, I have initiated a rezoning application for a 4.75 acre parcel (2 lots) located at 1701 Underhill Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. The property is currently zoned I2 and is developed as a single family home. The property owner has contracted with a buyer for the sale of this home. The buyer is unable to obtain mortgage financing due to the I2 zoning. The rezoning action if approved, will rezone this tract back to R1 Single Family. After discussing this request with Harry Nickens, I have initiate the rezoning on your behalf. This is consistent with the three or four similar requests before the Commission in 1992. Please let me know if you have any questions. c:~wrst~rc~wtse ~ Grp - - ~ ~\ ,~ ~ ~_ \ \ ~~ 8 ~ ~M~t/`!!n!~ ~oP~IZTi~s /' / T~/ ., .- - --- - aa,N ~oANoKE Ca. ~cAI~ln1/~~' C'oMNj/SS/o~/ *,. DEPARTI~NT OF PLANNING TI~1 # jD. /~ -- / -- ,Z ~ rlo.-/l - / -,3 Z' ~ ~ AND ZONING %f'EZON/~/4' 9, ~_-. .,, .Z' 2 To T~2 ~. 75 AcREs ~/~o~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.75-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 1701 UNDERHILL AVENUE (TAX MAP NOS. 70.11-1-2 AND 70.11-1-3) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 27, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.75 acres, more or less, as described herein, and located at 1701 Underhill Avenue, (Tax Map Numbers 70.11-1-2 and 70.11-1-3) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-2, Single-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEING the same property conveyed by Danny Ray Wise and Deborah S. Wise, husband and wife, to William C. Burleson and Janet C. Bost by deed dated March 19, 1993, of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1396 at page 632 with an attached plat of the property prepared by C. E. Lacy, Jr., Land Surveyor, dated March 17, 1993. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\plan.mm -~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-14 GRANTING A BPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO JITENDRA DESAI TO CONSTRIICT A RELI- GIOIIS ASSEMBLY AND COMMIINITY CENTER LOCATED ON BRANICO DRIVE (TAB PARCEL 105.00-2-77), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Jitendra Desai has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly and community center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to construct a religious assembly and community center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Jitendra S. Desai to construct a religious assembly and community 1 center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 1 try ~~~° c 501 ' s54} ER ~ / m - PEH,~O EKE . ~`~~ EpEt c`` ea ~,°,°lbcN 6 3 ` j Q COTTON HILL gat„a `5 nt~g.~ MEAGE„~,.STATES x1998 ~ \I `__ c 1 BeiT R ~ FOX GAggF JpS.OPK `~ \I` \ L ~A ~ O R /) , ~ ~\ T 'tip 0 I -- d ~ ~ , ~ . nza ~~ ~ u, cs'~ RJ ERN Z' ~ \O APII Jd ~ o¢ ~ rEa ~ z 3' Fd w~ 1•~ z =o r a a ~ ~ A2W 'Rangy O 9A ~ S ~ H .o .. _ ____. _ I ~ ° /_ ~.~ • VICINITY MAP ,~ ~,~, o ~~ ~ - ~c=,~ ~7: G88 -- Tc See Mcp 9604 ~ ~ ~ ~-~~~~_~- ~_ ~o~,/~ -" ~ i._ ~ _~__ic, 8~U '~ ~~-~ ;D, o! / ~ _._-.- , ~z ,II ~z= , ~~ - `':z:. _ at~,lcl ~T71'03 e _. _. s. -1 ~_/~ /,:~..,:c 3 ..~\ ,~, _. _(( z,. .; 1.2 ~ 8R/1N ~C~7 1~Ib /y_52` ~ 9 7400_ ~~ 7c ~\, '. i,' ~~ I - -3 ~C~_~ ~~~~~ / 12 44~~ I I 7 > ~ ~ / - .«__ - z-z. z.~~?'- ~ '~II \~•,I ~ I~ 5 c~ 72 z:.::i~- i4~ `'0, - /~ z>~ \- ///4~ ;7 a~:< 20 ~ .. ~ _ _ . / j - \ .r it ,[ o» _c ID~ 7135 ~ _ 10 _' z 22.~ 7I~, ~ irec»; I;I 20 - .%g z?ic~ 25 ~ 24 zz_< J ~, 1 h0 ~ .-~-. 2.1 --- _ ;a z~ ~ -: 13 ~.-_. , 3I i~ 2r _-~_/ ... 2 ', ~.Dl ic.._.1 I - ~ ~ _o.. 29Ja:~C1~ , 3s. / 31 / ./=s 40~ / 37 ,.. y~ 23 ~ I-, -14 15 .. ..~ .. ~C - 'IGl _. __' I19. '1 s ~7G .<~e3__ .c `~ a 25 ,. c~ ~ <IC, 32 ~,!/ 66 °~- ,5. 36 s r< -.1(t~l i ~~ <L <:LI ~ ~ ~ s zs_~ 41 35 24 z ~._~ % 62 8 n~ a ro. ° 5a _ ;c 34 cs..:,-, ~z I6 s+ ~~,~z c, 4 65 42 7700 is•: :..::. ,cd~c 31 2 .: s'c: zi<=° ~ zoa~:.an: 47 -coal \zlr-:<c;;l% 25 S,~z_:\ ~ r' ~ / ~ - 3S ~ ~cml n 64 ~ - icl 33 ~ ~ 3.2 ...cc' ,.7.. ' . 22; ., :. ~ _) 2 IG-c 46 ~ [ s5:. (U 30 _ ~' " '~i, \'\ / 60 ~ 0 43 ~ ~ z : ici - I • 49 I ' -" ~, 4I ~~ ~'ss_c ~ z ;.. 1 .. _ _.ic,1 zss~< J0 l ~ , ~ ~ V ~~~ ~:~:: (D: 53 52 51 1 3'-=; Icl A I / G. ~'~ ~ ` :c 42 57 ~ ~ ~ i; ~,u 1 - ~~ - .1 ~~ ~.'.. CDuN~-y 5. :.~~.1 '•'...„I j :..5 .::'L1 /i I ~,G ,c (CI ~ / ~} LL t l~~PE,~l~ 7~0 ~T Z 2 I -~zohlF_D ~A~- f ~. -~ , ~ ,~° C°~ ~,~ ; pG,~ ~ITENDR~ S'. ~ES.4I ° DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG 7"M ~s lds oo - 2 - ?~ I . ? : F.ND zorrING SPECIAL USE ~ERMI T-' ~.1, ~~,u~~ous ~4SSFNIB~y L.t~ "" PETITIONER: JITENDRA DESAI CASE NUMBER: 8-4/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 6, 1993 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Jitendra Desai for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly and community center, located on Branico Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS John Holmgren who operates a cat kennel in the vicinity said that he supports the request. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission wanted to know where the building will be situated on the lot and how many stories in the building. Mr. Desai responded that the facility will consist of two levels; one will house the assembly hall, the other will contain a fellowship hall and kitchen. The building will be set back about 300 feet from the road (Branico Drive). D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other ` f j. ,: Terrance Ha gtoii, S retary Roanoke C unty Planning Commission ..? STAFF REPORT PART I A. EXECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of Jitendra Desai to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a building for religious assembly. The property is located on Branico Drive approximately 0.15 mile southwest of its intersection with Cotton Hill Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. By virtue of the adoption of the 1992 zoning ordinance and maps, this property was changed from A-1 to AG-1, requiring the approval of a Special Use Permit in order to construct or expand a place of religious assembly. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Religious assembly is allowed by Special Use Permit in the AG-1 district. In all cases other than those involving C-2 zones, religious assembly is subject to use and design standards which establish a maximum building coverage of 20 percent and a maximum lot coverage of 50 percent of the total lot area. Also when a place of religious assembly adjoins a residential use type, a type C buffer yard shall be provided between the parking areas and the residential use type. Commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT, which has given preliminary approval regarding sight distance at the proposed access--Branico Drive intersection. Site and building plans will be reviewed and approved before issuance of a building permit. "' PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDffIONS Location -Petitioner's site is a portion of a 9.65 acre parcel situated off Branico Drive in the Cotton Hill/Masons Knob area. The petitioner's intent to purchase four acres of the existing 9.65 tract is contingent upon approval of this request. The site lies in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area with no urban services available. TopographyNegetation -The subject property is undeveloped and heavily wooded with mature deciduous, and to a lesser degree, evergreen species. The area proposed for development is moderately to steeply sloped. Surrounding Neighborhood -The subject site and all surrounding properties are zoned AG-1. Existing homes lie north, south, and west of subject property. A recently constructed cat kennel and Branico Drive border the proposed site to the east. Including those parcels with homes, the area is heavily forested. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -Petitioner proposes to construct a 4,800 square foot wood frame church (one-story from grade, 2,400 sq.ft. footprint with basement) and an associated parking area accommodating up to 40 vehicles. Site plan approval may necessitate modifications to parking area and/or building location. Access -Proposed building will be accessed by a private driveway off Branico Drive (12 feet wide per VDOT records) with grades expected to reach 17 percent. VDOT will enforce a 30-foot wide entrance with adequate site distance decreasing to a 20- foot wide, excluding curbs, paved aisle per County standards. Traffic Generation/Circulation -Existing congregation of 50-60 families and proposed building maximum seating capacity of 150 people would not normally be a significant traffic generator. However, Branico Drive 1986 ADT was only 52 vehicles. The 40 parking spaces proposed are sufficient for 160 seats in the principal place of worship. Pavement and 5 percent interior landscaping. will be required per ordinance. The proposal may generate an average 37 trip ends per weekday and an average 151 trip ends per Sunday, according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual. These estimates may be high based on the proposed building's seating capacity and parking area. Amenities -Please see Applicable Regulations for discussion of screening and buffering requirements. Concept plan indicates no outdoor activity areas. Depending upon elevation of proposed building and parking area, exterior lighting should be carefully located. Natural Amenities - An estimated 1-1.5 acre of the front (east) portion of the property will be disturbed. The VA Department of Forestry recommends that a 35 to 50 foot wide buffer of green non-combustible landscaping be provided between the proposed building and existing forest to protect against woodland fire in this setting. No disturbance of the western one-half of subject site is anticipated. (.,G,/ -- 3 Fire/Rescue - Paved site access drive and parking area(s) will be able to accommodate emergency vehicles although proposed 17 percent grade may be troublesome in inclement weather. Of greater concern is that the site is not within the established service standard. Anticipated travel time exceeds eight minutes. Drainage - On-site stormwater detention facilities will be required. C. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN Subject site is designated Rural Preserve by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Institutional uses are limited with moderate compatibility in Rural Preserve areas. Petitioner's request is generally consistent with policies limiting land development to that which is not detrimental to productive agricultural lands, forest resources, and park and open space facilities. However, it is important to note that certain remote locations may not be appropriate for even a limited proposal. D. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Institutional uses of a regional nature which may locate in rural areas based on such factors as land value should be discouraged through the Special Use Permit process. Adequate area exists within subject property to comply with the zoning ordinance and all accompanying standards. Currently, the concept plan is characterized by dimensional shortages regarding parking space depths, aisle widths, and screening and buffer yards which can be corrected during site plan review. Regarding County subdivision regulations, the 4-acre subject site should be platted as a separate tract upon approval of this permit request. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Petitioner's proposal to construct a building for religious assembly, while generally consistent with the Rural Preserve designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, appears to be of a regional nature which will attract individuals into a more remote rural area. Any non-residential use can significantly alter the rural character of an area, although the site specific impacts of this proposal may be minimal at this time. However, over time, future expansions could modify the rural environment and lead to demands for increased services (such as widening Branico Drive) nQt anticipated in this remote location. PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD DATE: APRIL 6, 1993 r ~ 1~9~ ROANOKE COUNTY L-Lr APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL -£~~@N'" USE ~ ) ~~ 1. Applicant's Name: ./,~~=~y~- s- ~i~~-~ ..Phone: J';~~~- 3~/-~~ Address: ~l 7'~ s~-r; x ~i' ~")-E~ ~ L~,C~/~~ ~t~ c~ 6~~--~ ~/ Zip ' 2 y ~ ~ 2. Property owner's name Address : ~ 2 ~ ..Phone: ~' Z - ~~'~ 7 3 3 . Location of Property : ~/~,q~/~~~~~/i/G- 76 ~ s T~ 2vu ~~ Size of property C~S acres/sq.ft. Size of proposed special exception use ~ Q acres/sq.ft. 4 . Tax Map # : /OJ`~ O ~ " Z -'7 7 '~-'`~'X # 5. Zoning Classification: ~' .Z 6. Magisterial District Location: A~C^ ~°l~1NG - 7. Existing Land Use: ~dU,,~S 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: ~1 ~.C/~/DG/S ~5s~~f~'~'~ ~. G~J~ i'YJ kil~v~y 1-~%Y`,Lc ~ ,, S~ % / /V l KE TA~b/ ~/~.~ Y-/ ~ v 9 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ C'l~i~~ I /c~6~c2r/~ 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: ~/~/y- Value of Land 2U~ S~~_ Value of Proposed Buildings 2crv ~' -- Value of Machinery & Tools /~ /~- Number to be Employed N /'.r 11. Check Completed Items: / 8~" x 11" plot plan Consultation List of adjacent property owners `~ Letter of Application Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $1,875 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and. refuse site $40 All other Special `-E~e~fe~i-e-n Uses 12. Date of Application: -~/ ~ 9/ ~~ 13. Applicant's Signature: r t,.~C..~°~.~ SHANTI NIKETAN (COMMUNITY CENTER/PLACE OF WORSHIP) The community of Americans of Indian heritage in the Roanoke valley comprises around sixty families. Most of us live in the county. One of our cherished dreams is to build a community center and place of worship that will enable us to carry on the Indian traditions in our adopted land and share this wealth with our children and grandchildren. The facility will be called SHANTI NIKETAN meaning'peaceful abode'. In the true spirit of the name, we intend to be harmonious with our neighbors and not be disruptive.We plan to take adequate steps to safeguard public safety, public health and general welfare of the neighborhood. We envision a building upto 6,000 sq.ft. constructed area. The building will have adequate land on all sides ensuring privacy and sound buffer. We will provide appropriate landscaping to achieve this objective. The facility will have 2- levels and a 40-car parking lot with paved road.At present, we will finish the top level of this building. However, we retain the option to finish the basement level and add additional parking spaces ,if needed, at a later stage. It is our hope that this facility will fulfill the long felt need of our community to have a venue for social gatherings, cultural programs and place of worship. Chairman -----~ i~~`t'-~-~ . Jeetu Desai 4985,Fox ridge Rd. Roanoke,Va. 24018 Secretary, ~- _.__ Dr. Rajiv Jain Feb.17,1993. C~C.J ~• NS ~--,. CO.,~nx~s 4463 CLOVERDALE ROAD, ROANOKE, VA 24019 ROANOKE - [30TETOURT OFFICE (703) 977-1777 ~,,,~ l~ /993 ~,~ ~ 7X map -~ ~i~ ~ ~.~~~.~.~ ~~ P ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ® ffYJ4 MY4~i orro~n~n REALTOR w i ~~ I„ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~, ~6?I ~ ~ 6 ~- ~ ` ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~~~ • ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ,? ~ a o ~ ~':~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ y ti v ~,~~h ~~ ~~ ~ `t ~~ / ~~ i~Cp `~ r ~ ~ r a ~; a ~ i~ O ~ V'j ~' ~~ x • 1 ~ ~t w r o ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~, i ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. l N ,N ~, ~ ~ ~,~ ,, ~ o ~ `~ ~ i ~. , 1 ~~1 ~ ~ ;~ '~ ~ I E i! Z ~ ~ ~_ ~ ', i ~n <'l` ~ \ ~ ~ ` ~ \ ~ ~. , , Q ~ ~ ;: -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- r ~ 1~ ~ `2 ti ` I r -' ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~` ~~ r ~ a '-,N i ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ - m ~ ~ ~ t~ // ~ ' ~t,, ~, na \ ~ ~ t ,. \ ~ I q ~ ~ .~ \ , ~ - ~~ ~~ ~ r`1 ~ _ , .. •~~ ~ N ,.. ~ ~ - . ,o O '~ `\ ~ ~ ~ \ w 9 ( ~ \~ ~ c~ ~- ~ ~ -s v, ,! v oc ~ ~ ~ ' /~ o ~ ° ~- cV v o uj ,n ~ _ ~ / .( O o ld1G' i 1 ~ •~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. o} ~:~~ w ~ ~ i N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ v ~! Q ' ~ a ~t ` ~ ~ ~ ~ti~ .~ vq~ , ~1~ o w~ y ~` ~ ~ r ~ ~Q'.~{ 1 . , / ~~ Y ~ ~l ~ ~O~ ~ ` N ~ , - ~ / / i~~ i ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ \ 3 j ` ; ~ ' ' _ .~ z ,~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ $,~ ~` n ~ ~ ~ ~ i i / ` ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q N ~~ , ~ ,~ `~ ~ ` lN '"~ ~ -- - i ~;o ~ , .~ ~_; , ,- N , ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ i . ~ \ / ~ ~ \,` ~- i `~! ~ ~_~ ~' ~ _ , y_r F N `-~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ O W ~ m ~ / ~ -~ ~`~` ~ o T ~ ~ ~ J Q` ~ u ~ ~ o - a : N - •7 _ - ~a :o ~° ~ ? a ~ ~~ z 0 U h _ 0 t~ I / b? / /~y a ti ~ Z r N 0 0 _N \ r- yZ{ _c ~ a m a ~ a .~ 0 O `0 s ~ N ~ ~ lS ~ O ~ '~ N s~ M ~ 4 o V ~ ~ al N ~ 4 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q o ~ n ~ ~~ ~ J ( h o r~ O Q ~ ~ ~ ,t ~ ~ v ~ ~ / Lr~' ~j°P c 50! ~ 854 ER ~ / m QEN~G CpE5iK~ ~~ ~~, ~ eP ~P~PCN 6 3 e° ~~ STATES LL Qt aloe ^` ~ NCI x 1999 ~ MEaGE `~ ctAl tae., FOx Ga._ ~ LOPK 1 x1323 / o sW "qa,,r a4~~~/~ ~I .~ o ¢~ ~9 _ ,. G _- /_ VICINITY MAP u-?- 3 Q ,_, o `C, v n. - / _~ ~~y~ °c See hicp 96.04 ~ ~ :' - .( ~ ~ ~ 1'~~'R~~~~-`/~ I'~ < 2J0 ~~ .. ~ ./ 79 ~! - ,~ K a ;~ 7 3 78 b aa~c ~' _ ~ 300. ~' Ems.:- ~1 .., _ ~ ,..c (O • I J' ;D. O: l es"; Ic a~' \~~ z ~ ~ `42:.- p l t.444c(CI e_a:.< 19. 1 ~' / '`.ea<cc 3 "\ sass. z7z~s", 12 q` 7400 \ ~ ;_ _ 4 zzl_ 13>> a I y8 I c . "~ \~ aNS.ic 75 ~( 2 <. :c~: 18 ,.• 12 '' I I ~~-7 5 72 z ;,.~ \ 74 y~ ~ ` ~ 12T C 11yJ ~ .: LC -' 2. -.1. ICI\'-_, 5 \._ to/~ 19 si Gc ( 6 , 73 ~ ~ ,, I jl:,< I ='=- 33~.:c - IG '<ID! 7!55 317 AC ~ 711 `~',, l7uo .:"rl .s 20 ~I^•~ ic; ~9 / 26 21 __ / _i_`• 2•I ILi~<I;ci 1~.:._ ,; 22yac 25 24 zsd.:c loe ;:_ :-3, 6~ ~ . , ~ ~ 69 2 aDaP_ 18 12 13 Ic>:.,,D; T-~ e .. ~3.~c • 68 `~a2c: 39 ~g 19 zss c^o I< IC;, _ -13r:.a 3 ~ 23 ~ _ ; ~. i ~ . I_• 3l9 ac z sD~.:c• ><_< / 't,r \ 681 ; 2d[ .Dl j'~ 23a Ac 29e,: ~ 1 :J 1'I 30 laza_ .. \a~ z,y_- 23 ~ 17 14 15 3.9~ ~ s 40 37 ,.. _,y ,, L._e :.:lu o~ / 31.:< ~ r 67 ~ .. 7V I:.°~eao ~<ictGl _ lssa< 22 ~ ~ 25 _ -- z .. •~ 13s:.:lcl ~// - a66 ~.." a~o, ~ ~^ 35 , a:z-:.-ia "~\~ ^~ Diu ~ i, 32 _ ~~z„ ::,cl 26 I la :.c 3ze.:< 41 ~ 35 24 z3da< J a.ID 0.< 5 5a ac;G1 ~ 62 ~!' ., 34 t ss a ca I iz.~. ~ 16 / 33 5 13z c:.:: g4 65 42 770.0 13a ~<;~1 ~„a gl ~ 2 ; s; ~• f IL~cP<¢. ,• 28 zo3 a:m; ,i- 47 \2JG:c IDI / 29 ' I Ez ~<\ 1 re / 63 ~ zza:.<la eoa.,< 3n.:~cc. r- 13 ~ciDl I '<lCl 33 ~' 32 '~;: 2Jy a: 34 61 ,064 ~ :\°~ z,g :lGI z.ia". „ zIS ~. ~ 2zr.~~L ~' '"ICZI:~ 2lcc< 46 ~ ,` zssa<tu 30 I za.o ~\5ia/~11zaT;,< _l N ~ ~•-- ~. 48 1 ~,, I ~.~~,'„ - ~\ \~//, 60 \0 43 ~z=e~ iii z~ -^ 49 s• .~~~•11_, _ 41 ~ 1 \'.55.. Y~ 2 7J • Ul / ,' - -:ic,( •zss a< 50 :~? ~ r -s ~ I ~i-I:.c~%44 45 --_ I J : A: u; e fi .tc ~', ~ .r ~. C .;~ 59 :1\ o~3aT:_ID; 53 52 51 13:.<ICl ~ o, ~ 42 ~~ 57 50\~ 39_ ~,cl_5.1 I, ~' I ... ~~HNlC ;< - .. ;.....;:; , ...~~I I.I.. CouNry SZ ..c 41 :'.35 :~'CI 1'iG .:c (CI To ~2T 22l ~v ao,h r r~ DEPARTNfENT OF PLANNING ~l7END~2~ s'. ~ESA~ -rM ~ /d5 00 - 2 - ? ~ ' AND ZONING SPECIAL USE' ,FERMI T' `~' ~ ~` ~~u~~ous ~4SS~MBLy e I! s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JITENDRA DESAI TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEM- BLY AND COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATED ON BRANICO DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 105.00-2-77), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Jitendra Desai has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly and community center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to construct a religious assembly and community center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Jitendra S. Desai to construct a religious assembly and community 1 ~-, center located on property owned by Raymond L. and Virginia B. Meador on Branico Drive (Route 763) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. c:\wpSl\agenda\zoning\desai 2 ~~ W~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARDCOFIINTII~P ADMINISTRATION CCENTER ~ Y, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE lgg3 TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, ORDINANCE 427 5 GATING A SPECIAEL ISTE PERMIT TO WARREN E. BOOTH TO E%PAND AN ING CHIIRCH BIIILDING FOR SIINDAY SCHOOL ROOMS AND FELLOWSHIP HALL LOCATED AT 8269 4RADSOHAW ROAD, (TA% PARCELS 41.00-2-12 AND 13.1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Warren E. Booth has filed a petition to expand an existing church building for Sunday school rooms and fellowship hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on property owned by Moores Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That the Board finds that the granting of a special use for Sunday school church building permit to expand an existing rooms and fellowship hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on property owned by Moores Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2, That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Warren E. Booth to expand an existing church building for Sunday 1 school rooms and fellowship hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on roperty owned by Moores Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial P District. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Director, Planning & Zoning Terrance L. Harrington, Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Actinpgttorney r, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County 2 >rr~ __ ~ P~ G V~ i9 ,~'~ oa N-'~ G NORTH ~ - 6 na pc ~Dl P/0 3100-1-31 ~~\ ~ 926pc;C1 _1 \ I~.a00' / 25 2.6 \ \ _ neemlm \ \\ ` /~ ,~ i9-Y~' ~]n9pc ICI O \ ` Gv pCiE r~ ,i \O 20 _ 2 ~ 4,.>s ~ r _ ~5 ]C_Cl]I ~ 0 3 i ~~ ~` ib 6n YIC. \ 51 ]0 pcl]I \ / 2.1 q ~ •_aaomla ~~iDO / 22 ti ~ a' ism 22~ IOO lk pc t0l 2 ~\ \\ \\~'~~~5~ ~ ` i / p~~~ ]89]pc ICI 21 ~/ c ~~~ ~ 9` \ ~ ~ 23~ ~~ n I a \ ~ \ -c \ ~ 10 ~ r~ %' / / 6321[ ~L~ oP~~er~~~' ~ ~ ,~~ `, ~ '~ 96 ] 4c 17 I'. //-~ i7;1 sO• /e,- ~, q~. -(2~ 13.2 •.U I ~ Is - ~, 30 ~ ~ 2a I 1169 pc , ~I~ ' 1 ~ ~ 1 I `\~ 29na1 Y ` \ ~5o s]pc c `a 5' ieap<lo~ la .. .~,,~; I~:p;c:~ pr2AC~0 . \ii6Jee ~\ ice. / 25 ~ \ ~2n ' \\ -I~ M/ 26 _ 0~.~ _. ~ 5)Si.c 29t \ /~ \ \ / ~ ,s.~/ ~~ \ 9z x\ '.`s ~ ~ \ _ \ B~~ l41 ~ 13 I __~ \ 1 man ~`~p< ~ 168]'< \ __ .___-- S ~ X16 \ \ 28.1\ A/_-~ n023pc O I /~ \ ~ '\ Ip~ v n ~ `~\ \ ' ~~ ~ / ~ -S~nwer In D/0 53.00-I-B ~ ~. ~ ~ \~ ~~~ \ / _ I••~ I ze - / zi ~ ~ ~\ I 'I I .6 ~YJ1< %`' \ ~ 16DL- 22 1~led ~ 1921 pc ~`y r ~ ~~ ~~ Z~.. 621pe ~ ZO ~ V" \ `~ e~~ 23 ~ ; ~ ~\ A 3. (~/ \ V ~7 6 150pe~ ~ AK ~ ~ ~` ~~~ USd • _\ f' .291.--~ ~ `\ _~ '292 \%° a~n" *, DEPAR'I'NIENT OF PLANNING ~Q1eREN ~~ 800Tf1 //~/IOORES CHAT'~L, G~utcctr 7'M # ~~DO-z-l2 ~ ~~OD- 2-/3./ '` - AND ZONINGSPEC/AL USE PE'rPNll7~ .- .~ > . TEL /~~'/OUS ~S's'EMf-~L y ~, y PETITIONER: WARREN BOOTH CASE NUMBER 9-4/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 6, 1993 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Warren E. Booth for a Special Use Permit to a 8269aB a shave Roadh Catawlba for Sunday School rooms and fellowship hall, located Magisterial District. B, CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the request. following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. The motion carried with the _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map G. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report -Other ~,i'~ Terrance Harrington ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~'~ / STAFF REPORT PART t B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of Warren Booth, pastor of the Moor ere aheptwo adjo Wing piecesr of Special Use Permit to expand an existing church. Th roperty involved with this request. The .47 acre .parcel isi 79eacres). e-I-helnproposed p is. To the west and north of thontoa this' largerr parcel cand encumber this lot. The expansion would cross over roposed expansion would accommodate four additional S ~ the ex ansion would add P fellowship hall. The existing building is 3,200 square feet an P another 1,120 square feet. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The current zoning of the two parcels involved is es n standards for thssriu e IltYpe churches only by Special Use Permit. Use and d g include additional landscaping requirements for outdoor activities when adjoining residential use type, building coverage limitation of 20 percent and lot coverage limitation of 50 percent. The petitioner has in excess of 2 acres of land and would not violate these building or lot coverage limitations. Site plan review and approval will be required before a building permit can be issued. ::.:::.:::.: ::.::.:.::.. .; ..... 2 PART II ~~ ~ ,~/ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDfT10NS arcels of land -one is .47 dine wi h the 1, Lot Area - This request involves two p other is 1.79 acres. The p ~~ ~thereforepencumberr the lot property expanded budding and wou 2. Location -This site is located on Braasand res dent all n naturee Smith Gap Landfill. The area is generally agricultur 3, Existing Use -This property is currenrlYchurch membehs.rcThe property slorpes parking, and a small playground area fo rather steeply to the northwest and is generally open fields. g. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Proposed Use -The church is" pro d r ma no the samessroom space and a fellowship hall. All other activities woul 2, Parkin - No additional parking spaces acifie s reeuiredaparking basedr ono the expansion. The zoning ordinance spe q number of seats in the "place of worship". Petitioner is not proposing to increase the worship area. 3, Screening/Buffering -All of the surrounding properties are zoned AG-3 so no screening and buffering is required. 4, Public Services -There are no public utility services to this site. C. CONFORMANCE Wfl-H COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN These parcels are located in a Rural Pr ss such las churches asp desirable within Comprehensive Plan lists Rural Institutional Use this land use designation. This church s d as ricultlural Icha aster ~ of tha general areas the surrounding low density residential an g The church also serves as a meeting/gathering place for the general public and the addition of the fellowship hall will facilitate this. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff does not anticipate any negative impactCom nrehensv e Plana expansion. The petitioner's request is in conformance with the p PREPARED BY: JANET SCHEID DATE PREPARED: April 6, 1993 • ROANOKE COUNTY ~..- .~ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL -E~P~~~' USE Phone: 268-1205 Warreri E . = Booth ... --:. 1• Applicant s Name: 467 Dark Run Road Address: .. Zip• -24087 _. Elliston, Virginia 2• Property owner's name Moores Chapel Church 384--6972 Bradshaw Road VPhone: Address: Salem,Vir~ginia . Zip:, 24153 3. Location of Property.:, lot l Ma o and a 0.47 Acre Tract Situated on Va. Sec Rt 62.2 ana Rte 727 in C ~rnbinec~ . Size of property 2.2~v acres/-~=~~• .,~~-/ sq . f t . Size of proposed special exception use 2400 . ~ _ l 3, ~ 4 . Tax Map # : ~-~_; nn ~ -1 ~ _ ,3 5. Zoning Classification: C.~ , t14~ F3~- 6. Magisterial District Location: ~ct~C h~ 7. Existing Land Use: .N~- 8. Proposed Special Exception User _ _ ^~ ._~ SC,{-a e~~- ~ZC~~rti-4s ~ FL,~~o~US~ ~ P ~ H t-~~-- ~~~CZP~L- t~P.~SC.~2~J ~ g. Comprehensive Plan Designation: •C,-~~" GYI~ 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Value of Land ~~~ ~ Value of Proposed Buildings Ig Value of Machinery & Tools ~~-~ Number to be Employed t=_ 11. Check Completed Items: ~g~" x 11" plot plan ~~ Consultation ~/~ Letter of Application List of adjacent property owners - Filing..fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" ~- 75 S ecial Use Permit for sanitar fill. _ 8 _X_ $1~ method garbage and, refuse site ~$40 All other Special ~~~~~' Uses 12. Date of Application: 13. Applicant's Signature 7 February 19, 1993 To Whom it May Concern: This letter is to notify you of our desire to add additional rooms to our church, Moore's Chapel Baptist. We wish to add four Sunday School rooms and a fellowship hall. There are several reasons why our churchn hasd rownocons dehably n'the I rooms. The primary reason being that our churc 9 last year and there is simply not enough ro ssesothatphave had to beucombined .due We currently have some Sunday School cla to lack of space. As you know, an overcrowed room is not conducive to learning. The additional Sunday School rooms would eliminate the overcrowding of these classes. Another reason is that the current fellowship hall is unable to meet the needs of our growing church. Many times weat stand ng up' because there lis no events in the fellowship hall, people have to room to sit down. At these times, all of our currlee sS~ have to eatlwh~e standing. chairs are made available for the overflow. Peop Finally, additional rooms would not only meet th hat affect the people n t e so the needs of the community. When events happen t surrounding area, the Roanoke County Landfill for example, they often wish to meet at our church because of its location.'m h oveme is tlo ounc~hurclh' s alsoean available for these meetings. We feel that p improvement to the community. As such, we would like to be able to provide the best possible facility. We ask that the special use permit be granted for the reasons outlined above. Should you have any additional questions, please contact me. I can be reached at (703) 268-1205. Sincerely, ~1~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a , Warren E. Booth, Pastor Moore's Chapel Baptist Church /~>- l; _, %, ~' O N r Z Q~ U ~ ~ > ~ s a I LOT 7, OLAUDE E. REEVEB bIJBDM51pN PROPERTY OF GLAUDE E. REEVES P. O. BOX IT55 CALUi'EUS, GA 31907 P. 8.10. PU. 57 TAX No. 41ID0-1-I3 IOPED AG-3 4, USE: RESDENTIAL . }°j ATONE OF PIOORE'S CFIAPEL G-+~+ TAX No. 4IID0-7-13J LOPED ICs-3 Ll9 ACRES USE: CFAA':C.H i-Q0~_ ~~-~ L!'lITS OF _---~- CaR,dDNG WOTdC---~ ------ u-~ - - - - - - --- '1PIG TREES g ~ ~ ~ IE5S0' ~ pINLDNG~ ~ TAX No. 41ID0-1-D E~T~ ZOPED AG-3 ~~ m 0.4t ACRE6 rEX15TNG P ~A 1~ ~ tel. ~ ~ !e!~! . '~ z A BUILDING LaE 0 R3.48'~ 6' P. LL E. '_'_--s-- 3`j b 67' m~ ems! ~--= 5 ~i~ ~8' TE No. 622 8R~`~~ R ___---- ~ va mac. Roy ~, ~,,,- _ EXISENT~-~ 1~ ~SKaHT DISTANCE 5~ ~ ~------ ~~µT p15tA1dGE'~ ~- PROPERTY OP PROPERTY Of MA7NARD O. AND ELIZABETH GONNER ARCNIE ELUIOOD /t LILLIA NWLEY ROAD 8305 BRADSHAU! ROAD 6AL8'b V y1LEP1, VA 7463 TAX No. 41D~-I-5 TAX No. 41D0-I-6 LOPED AG-3 ZOPED AG•3 USE, RESIDENTIAL USE: RESDENTIAL MOORE'S GNAPE~ CHURCH CONCEPT PLAN r~-GALE 1= = 60.m' FEBRUARY 19,1993 a EXISTNG BU4DNG AREA 3700 SGl FT. NEW IDDITION AREA IIIO SO. FT. PREPARED 67 KNSE7 ~L~PE 140 ASSOCIATES, ARGFHTEGtS, 6ALB1, yIRGNUI ~~ ~Q g~~= ~ A Y ~~ F G8£TARY NO ADDRE! TAX Na 41J 10PED AG• sr3 - SG = y` ' su 3 ° 7 V~ ~ ~ P ~ eaa 8 .z l`SC~ a / 62 e "/ / eta 620 7 4 740 (i e ,J~S~ / 0~ s2o 7~ 81 / ^~ ~ \bZ 04 ~ 6 Iee ~S~ 7 22 O 311 629 99] P~P~g 6 - s s _ ~I 7es C 733 TOS 311 117 ~~5 ~"~ P O \ 11 619 311 ~,,s ~' - t E ~`' 1 H • 2 •~ 622 SAL ~. ~4 ~---^ ~ OAN~ O 'a VICINITY MAP ~.~ aENM rr. w-y D NORTH y ~. -~ ~= I se a S33i.c ~ --- - ---- ~ -- %~ ~~ , ,,\ 1 P/0 5300-I-8 \ ~ ~ \ 3I ``\\~_ ~ \~_~ ~` I >o \ TI ~~ ,~. ao"" r~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~AI~REN ~• BDOT!-1 /MODRES CHA~~. G'fIl,~RCf~ 2' ' - AND ZONING SPEC/AL USE P~rPM/7- ~~~~• ~EL~~,ous .~ssEMa~y 41, ~`"! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OUNTYPADMINISTRATIONAENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANO APRIL 27, 1993 TUESDAY, ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO y~p~RREN E. BOOTH TO EXPAND AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING FOR SUNDAY SCHOOL ROOMS AND FELLOW- SHIP HALL1 ooA2ED2AT~D241.00 DSHAWI,OACATAWBA PARCELS 4 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Warren E. Booth has filed a petition to expand an existing church building for Sunday school rooms and fellowship ro erty owned by Moores hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on p P Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use for Sunday school church building permit to expand an existing rooms and fellowship hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on property owned by Moores Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Warren E. Booth to expand an existing church building for Sunday 1 ~' `!i school rooms and fellowship hall located at 8269 Bradshaw Road on roperty owned by Moores Chapel Church in the Catawba Magisterial P District. c:\wpsl~agendaV.o~B~bO°~' 2 ~J` ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TTUESDAyO,ApRILN27,A1993ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCB 42793-16 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRUSTEES OF AZUSA STREET MINIS- TRIES, U.P.C.I. TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING AND THE FUTURE CON- STRUCTION OF RELATED FACILITIES LOCATED AT 312 AZUSA STREET, (TAX PARCELS 26.16-2-12 AND 26.16-2-13), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries, U.P.C.I. have filed a petition to allow the expansion of an existing church building and the future construction of related facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of an existing church building and the future construction of related facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1 the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the 2, That to allow the U,p.C.I. Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries, an existing church building and the future construc- expansion of d facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in t e tion of relate conditions: ins Magisterial District, subject to the following Holl C along eastern a) Screening and buffering, type property line. hat the auditorium shown on the concept plan, not b) T art of this Special Use Permit. be authorized as P from Vivian c) That the dumpster be relocated away Avenue houses. and motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Ordinance, On carried by the following recorded vote: u ervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix AYES. S p NAYS: None A CppY TESTE: ~'~') ,~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors Roanoke County File Director, Planning & Zoning cc: Harrington, ections Terrance L• Director, Engineering & Insp Arnold Covey, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment John W. Birckhead, Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County 2 Azusa sr~~Er N1/~v/sTK/mss 0.O,"+~ DEPAR'I'I~NT OF PLANNING T~„/ # 2ro. /(o -,?- /,2 ~ .2G. ~G- 2-/3 Z' < `- AND ZONING SPCC/A ~ ll.4E ~ER~~1 T ~' ._~~ ~'~L/4~ouS ASSENIF3L y I„. ,3„iCJ .~. ~.~+ L~.J ~ i ~ • r ~ 19 B ' O ,° ~0 ~. I 9 ~' a D ~ ~.,~ K \ t1a74 ~E,~1~iN~~l~ ~~~~T/ ZDx/~D ~-~ .53 ~' ~ ^/ ~~ I . ~ ~./ Q ~,.; / S~ ~ t ~(G G~ ~~ `~ ~~ wr ~ . , ~ \ a , O ~° A \\ ` S ° y 12 ~? -0 4 : ~ , ~, 1~ ~'s ~r ,a ~ e I S , , - ` .,., / / v.•rrr~e•..r Cnr•rn ~ ~ t ~ ~ / r ~; ~ ~ 25 ~, .. ~ S ~ c ~, ~„ ~ ; / ~ wrss, ~ ~ ?~ ~` `za ~ ~ \28 t~,~-,r PETITIONER: AZUSA MINISTRIES CASE NUMBER: 10/93 Planning Commission Hearing Da te:' April 2719993 Board of Supervisors Hearing P A. REQUEST Petition of Azusa Street Ministries for a Special U of rely ed faci hies, locat d at 312 Azusa existing church building and the future construction Street, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Maurice Kennedy of Nover Avenue, expressede caortnxcnern t with backup from sewer. r• Harrington said that he will notify the Utility D p Powell ob'ected to the future construction of related facilities and said that it should Doug ~ Conurussion. go back to the Planning Albert Robinson expressed concern with late night hours, noise and litter. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commission asked about the late hours and the litters TheTarbageewill now be pi ked The that revival meetingse°than oncexaemonthawhich should eliminate the litter problem. up once a week rath he Commission asked Rev. Turner if he would be willang ReveTurner said that he islwilling T the proposed auditorium from the submitted concept p to eliminate the auditorium from this request since construction of the auditonum was not planned for the near future. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS e C along eastern property line. 1) Screening and buffering, typ t the auditorium shown on the concept plan, not be authorized as part of this Special 2) Tha Use Permit. 3) Relocate dumpster away from Vivian Avenue houses. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Massey moved to recommend approval of the request with conditions. The moron carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map G. ATTACHrIIENTS: _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H 'ngto ,Secretary Roanoke unty arming Commission u.!-5" STAFF REPORT PART I _ _- __~... .. rrv1R T D V B. DESCRIPTION ecial Use This is the petition of Azusa Street Minietitioner's property i s located Permit to expand an existing church. The p in the Hollins on Olsen Road, near the hen se to can nalso be accessed from Dwig et famady Magisterial District. T through the Dwight Hills Subd wo s arcelshtotalingsll 80 acresing residential and consists of P contains the primary worship area. The first phfor The existing building building of the proposed expansion is an addition to the existing reschool in classrooms and office. (The concept plan also indicates a P district Preschools are not permitted in the R-1 zoning this building. etitioner is aware flans either by right or by Special Use Permit. The p at this time, a preschool cannot be established.) FU'au15,650asquare foot include a 5,000 square foot administration bunasium „ additional parking, auditorium building, an 8,500 square foot gym and outdoor recreation/activity areas. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS R2 R3, R4, is a use type permitted by right in the AV, Religious Assembly s ecial Use Permit in the AG3, AG1, AR, the NC, and C1 zoning districts and by p R1, and C2 zoning districts. In all cases except the Cui eis addi Tonal facilities are the7ebuildings sand recrea ton t areas e are adjacent to screening when residential use types. rior to issuing the building permit in Site plan review will be required p order to ensure compliance with County ordinances. 1 G~,~- .~ PART II p,. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ocation - The petitioner's site consists of tw the t rminusaof Dwight L --- acres with road frontage on Olsen Road an a y Area and Road. The site is in th bleeters Creek Communit Planning urban services are availa Topography/Vegetation - The site is fairly at thetnorthwesthcornera (developed area) with a small knoll rising The remainder of the site slopesofmthersite is a fie d with scattered Creek. The undeveloped portion containing trees. The petitioner has been informed of a dump typewriters, chairs, and containers located on the site near the creek. Petitioner was not aware of the debris and has indicated his willingness to eliminate the problem. istin Im rovements - One,~7,920 square foot building exists on the Fsr Q A site and contains a 224 seat sanctuary, areasaremgraveledffwith curb existing driveways and 64-space parking and guttering at the Olsen Road entrance. Surrounding Neighborhood - The site is bordered by single-family residential developments to the west and east (zoned R-1) and by the Green Ridge Presbyteriaa~Ciurc and C2h (commercial) uliesetot he2southe tract zoned R3 (multi f y) Access - There are currently e wRoadt which reaches Peters Creek Road primary entrance is off of Ols via Alpine Road. The second om P terstCreekrRoads oTheregaresmedian approximately three blocks fr cuts on Peter's Creek Road at both the Alpine and Dwight intersections. Neither intersection is signalized. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout - The petition tablepfor mosthof the proposed developmentl; facility. There is no time expansion will proceed as funds are available.fo~ mmlassrooms aand however, are to enlarge the existing building church offices. Future plans include a new 15, 65a gymnasiumt and haP area (called "auditorium on concept plan), areas are shown for administration building. Additional parking future construction maininCe undeveloped dareas eofe t le nsite as The indicated on the re g petitioner intends for thond to this area when the auditorium/worship of moving a baseball dram area is constructed. Traffic Generation - The petitioner's church holds services on Sunday mornings and evenings and of 31 5a trips per day per 1000 quare feet manual estimates an average 2 °' of gross floor area for Sundays and 7.7 trips per day per 1000 square Based on this, the feet of gross floor area for a Weenerate 252 trips per day on petitioner's current facility would g er day on weekdays. The future worship area Sunday and 62 trips p ends per Sunday and 120 trip could generate an average of 491 trip ures ma be high for the ends per weekday. Staff feels that thescafagit andyparking area. current congregation, based on seating p Y Future traffic generation volemc n re ation cand the number cof church tied to-the future size of th g g related activities on the site. ravel parking areas and driveways at the Amenities - The existing g awed. This should significantly site are in the process of being p reduce or eliminate problems that a few neighbors have had with dust from the site. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHgNS.IVE PLAN The site is in the Development designation of ~heeS°andedensitiesland This designation encourages a mix of housing Yp arks, schools, encourages community activity centers such as p churches, and recreation facilities to serve the neighboring residents' needs. The petitioner's request is consistent with the applicable policies of the Development designation. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petitioner's request to expand an existing church facility is generally consistent with. the DevelopmenteSdeasg community act vity acenters~uare Comprehensive Plan in that church , encouraged in developing residential areas. Full development and use of the characteri t i s 1 of the a site paand master plan will increase the us associated traffic volumes on the adjacent neighborhood streets during periods of peak usage. PREPARED BY: LYNN DONIHE DATE: April 6, 1993 3 ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY USE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL L••~ licant s Name: Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries Yhbne: 366= 0494 1• APP ~ U.P.C.I. Address: 312 Azusa Street, Roanoke, VA 24019 Zip:_ 2. Property owner's name Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries U.P.C.I. ' Phone: 366-0494 Address: 312 Azusa_ Street, Roanoke, VA 24019 Zip: 3. Location of Property: , _312 Azusa Street Size of propert; 11.8 acres .acres/sq.ft. ro osed special exception use 11.8 acres acres/sq.ft. Size of p P 4 . Tax Map # : 26.16-2-12 and 13 Old Tax Map # 5. Zoning Classification: Residential District R-1 6. Magisterial District Location: Hollins 7. EXisting Land USe: Religious Assembly g, Proposed Special Exception Use: Religious Assembly, Auditorium, gymnasium and outdoor recreation area. l~evel~Y«<C1L g. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Not Applicable 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Not Applicable Value of Land Not Applicable Value of Proposed Buildings N/A Number to be Employed N/A Value of Machinery & Tools 11. Check Completed Items: lot plan xx Consultation xx 8~" x 11" p xx Letter of Application xx List of adjacent property owners . xx Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $1,875 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill__ _ method garbage and. refuse site J $40 All other Special ~Y~i-ear Uses lication: Febru 23, 1993 12. Date of App / ~ ~-~ 13. Applicant's Signature: ~-._. Trustees of Azusa Street M Rv .Tamac F Tlnn that Fcn pCHIBI' A . ._-- stries, U.P.C.I. C-~> -.~ V IRGINIA: BEFORE THE PLANROANOKEMCOUNTYN AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF II I N RE: Application for Special Use ) LETTER OF APPLICATION Permit for 11.8+ acres of ) AND land located at 312 Azusa ) pETITION FOR SPECIAL USE Street bearing official tax ) nos. 26.16-2-12 and 26.16-2-13 ) PO THE HONORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~F ROANOKE COUNTY: ~1) The petitioner, Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries, U,p,C,I,, is the owner of two adjacent parcels of land located at 312 Azusa Street in Roanoke County, Virginia containing a total of 11.8 + acres bearing official tax nos. 26.16-2-12 and 26.16-2-13. (2) The property is currently zoned Residential District The petitioner R-1 and is being used for religious assembly. desires to immediately enlarge and enhance the church located on the property, as generally depicted in the attached Concept Development, Floor Plan and Elevation, and to construct an administration building, auditorium, gymnasium, outdoor recreational area and required parking in the future. The petitioner is advised that either the zoning must be changed to Residential District R-2, or a special use permit be obtained, in order for a building permit to be issued author- izing construction of the improvements to the church and the proposed future uses of the property. M#146728 ~~ ~3) Your petitioner's property is generally bounded on :he east and west by Residential District R-1, on the north by she property of Green Ridge Presbyterian Church and on the south by an undeveloped 23.47 tract of land zoned Residential District R-3 and Commercial District C-2. ~4) The appearance of the petitioner's property will be greatly enhanced by the proposed use. The size of the property, 11.8 + acres, the petitioner's continuing use and future commitment to the property, the location of the adjacent Presbyterian Church and the recent rezoning of the adjacent 23.47 acre tract from Residential District R-1 to Residential District R-3 and Commercial District C-2 indicate that the special use permit should be granted. The petitioner believes that its presence conforms with existing uses in the rantin of a special use permit for neighborhood and that the g g the purposes indicated will stabilize the use of the property, allow it to act as a natural buffer and be a positive influence on the existing R-1 Residential and permitted R-3 Residential and C-2 Commercial uses in the immediate neighborhood. ~5) The petitioner believes the issuance of the special use permit for the property will further the intent and pur- pose of the County's zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. M#146728 UJ -.r (6) exhibits: The following documents are attached hereto as a, Roanoke County Special Use Application; b, Meets and bounds description of property; c, Vicinity map; d, Pertinent portions of Roanoke County Property Identification Maps No. 26.16 and 27.13; e, List of adjacent property owners; f, Conceptual Development Plan for Azusa Street Ministries, Floor Plan and Elevation; g, Development of Concept, Azusa Street Ministries. Respectfully submitted, AZUSA STREET MINISTRIES, U.P.C.I• D D L L ROCKY L. WILLIA S, Trustee i ~ ; n~ ALLEN COLLINS, Trustee c. / ~ i EMMETT CLIF E, r, James F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street p,O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 M#146728 _~~ . i Z~.Y t7~~u 3 z~ Q<i~ ~~ ` ~~'" - ~,•\ ~I ~I NI~~ I 0 ~ A ~i ~- ' N I ~ ~ d a ~~~'; F z ~, ~ ~ ~- ~ ,c; , ~~ . Y /_ \ __ ,T ' „1 S~ if ="i" C~ ~- ~{~, ~~... Y 1 1 u~ #; j Q t ~' ~ ~! ~/ '~ 1~91HX3 ,~ ~1 LL I ~V1 ~ p W~ SI 9 ~ ul ~Q~ ~~ 4 . ~~ N m LL trot ~ ~r a~ 7°~ 3 ~ d$R . U--d z ~%~~ ~ ~~ 0 03 ~ j 4`~ ~ ~~ w 3 ~ t= . Q~ P E ~4 0` o Sr ~ ~~ ~d Q ~ ~ QQ~~ `~!g y~~ ~1 ~~ w m w~ ~ ~ d ~ ~> a~ " r °~ ~9 ~ r3- ~ ~F ~ i 5~~~ ~r dLL ~- ~~ ~ ~ „~r ep µ~ LL u i~ "~ w~dFvJ ~ 0 ~~~00// / ! ~IIa P~ / ~ ~ ' ,_ ~ w p,L-~'~ ~ ~ .9 der ~ ~ / ~ 4~rt0 0 ~6w ~ } ~ ~ 0 --~1III ~~sod ~sW~'o ~ r-~ Icr ~pN~~~ w4W~rZ~ v jdo wJ~~= W o~'~ 0 ~ ~ '-" W QW~Ucr'Q ~~03(N jn/' ~ j ~ ~r~ N 1 F- ~?`~_ ~ ~ 30 ~ ~ ~ I~ m a~•x ~ Q PsZ.i -- '.-~6.1- ~~ I O ~ N~Q Q i I W .9 p O =g ~~pJ ` --8 1 a / O~ ~ '^1 - ~~~ _--_M-__- in `~'` ~ ~-- - S.L335f15 LH41P1C i vim''' `~ '4/ oo// LL --~_ ~ ~ W ~~ ~~od` ~s~o W $dr~- I ~~~N a~ ;F . \ lS~ai ~, 0 ~~ ~~-_ OWOd ,i~~Q 'w ~~~0 vXN ~~ W L i s"f P>~E~ ~ d 0 r Y~ ~r S t~l ~ ~~ dLL ~~ ~p ~ ~3 ~ Q ~~??,, 4 ~ ~dXa~ ~ , ..7a~7~ 0=~3~ ~ ~~~~~ 5 a ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~~ ~~ ~ 'Q--- i r WW1 ,~ z ~` -----"" j,, -- , ~ ~ -~oXX4 ~~ ~~~ ~ I ~ jNr J ---- r, - c~~l ' ; '~ -- r- -- Q i -,, w4~ ~ r~ `~ ~ D '~ n ~ ~ ~ 1 0 r ' O ~ S~ ~ `\\ ~ \\~- _ 1 ~/ ~V ~ ' ~ . ~y~ h Md~ 11 1b~ ~ Zd U p~p~ 3M W OQC'i ( y~ W t U ~i } 7 0 a Fd9 N ~ ~ i . Q~ q \ S ~ ~ d~ ~ . Z ar F o N ~~~ W ~ U ¢ ¢ z P. z z ~ ~ N ° w U Z Z ¢ ~> ' L W F. I z 0 O ~ ¢ >: ~aav ~ F- w Z Ors W LV N O ~~ g ~ Cry U doi~ a O ~ ~ aw ~ Y la W a~ w > Q O <n Z Z a A w ~ wO ~ J 0 w ~~ A N ~ °C a ~ ~ Q r Q ~~ ~ ~ j'~ 3 ~~ dr ~0.d~d J ~0~0 a tj 4;r 7 ~ m0~,J .,gig m ~o~ G~~~ S 4~'~3a e 1 G °~ ~ ~' ~ ~~~~~~~ ~3~~a99 LF iE ~~ EE V~ i Z Jp ~~ ~~ ~d ~~~ 0 b A d ~ J l= d ~ ~~] .~ r~ r it~~ f J2w ~~~~ 0 ~ iii #Oii a -»~ ~ =I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~Y.w. I I .. 16 II ~ q~ 5 ~ i6`Y eQ , ,~ ~• A ` / , ,~ o I ~ F y 12 4 ~ 19 ~ -0,1 ' ' 1. 'Ifr °° ~ ~ I ~y ? / R! f \ I ~ i O 13 peep . « ,. J ~ \ \ I ~ \ II ~~ \ "s ° ` / S ! ~ ~c c ~, ]f Y ~ C•Y.f• / / 8 .' \ OrI1II~fI,M C P1 ° 6 9 T p I ~_ „ \28 eS ; L. wC e P l o , i \ ' \ \23 ~ ?~\ \ II s • \ 4 2 e ~ \ X n tyf 2 \ a -0 21 X , \ ~'<' 33 • n uw 8 1 1 r, -0 ~ ~ - \ . P~ \ \ 3 16 I a "b \ ~ Si ,.L i\ J R . 0 -\ .\ ~ ~ zo ~ '"' 'q, \ ~ yo\ \ •, ~i • ~ \ \ ,~ I a r7 19 -. \11 0-+ J6 '^ 49\ t ~ \~~ 6 n , ° , ,~ 61 I\•~~ Y \ q, \ \ 3 :e \ ~ ~ ,, . is\ \ 17 \ . " va ~ \47 s > \ ` \ ~ \ +,a~ \ 16~\ IV9 W6 ~ I\`6~ ~ \ ~) ~~`` 3 . i ^~ /Aa \ \ ~\ 43 f.. f Y N. i+~/ ~ ' >> t c z . ~.,, ~ ., . .., ~ SM~ \ ~2 \ ~\- 62.1^ () ~ } ~ % 'lr w y ~ I ~ \ Ii8 firr M • \ p,, 2S47/s (/C__ ~ ~E~t~i~li~lG ~oP~~r-~ ~ $~ ~~ '~ ZO~~D ~-~ Azusa Sr~~Er N1in~~sT~2~~s DEPAR'I'I"IENT OF PLANNING a°°" T~„t # 20.1(0 -,~- /.2 ~ 2G. /G- 2-/3 r~ _~ ~ - n . ArrD ZONING sP,~cia ~ llsE DER^9~ T ~ ~ _ • ~~'LICfIDI{S ASSE-/trfF3L y , . hu ~.°',~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TROANO DCOUNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRpSTEEB OF AZURA STREET MINISTRIES, U•p•C•I• TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING AND THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF RELAT- ED FA ppL,gICELS 2)6 A16 2 12 3AND A 2 6 16S 213) , (TAX HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries, U.P.C.I. have filed a petition to allow the expansion of an existing church building and the future construction of related facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of an existing church building and the future construction of related facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Trustees of Azusa Street Ministries, U.P.C.I. to allow the expansion of an existing church building and the future construc- tion of related facilities located at 312 Azusa Street in the Hollins Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a) Screening and buffering, type C along eastern property line. b) That the auditorium shown on the concept plan, not be authorized as part of this Special Use Permit. c) That the dumpster be relocated away from Vivian Avenue houses. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\azusa 2 s ~~ - y°-~' AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-17 AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE OFFICE OF TH8 GENERAL REGISTRAR FOR ROANORE COUNTY AND, PIIRSIIANT TO §§ 24.1-37 AND 24.1-233.1 OF THE 1950 CODS OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL ABSENTEE VOTER ELECTION DISTRICT IN THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES LOCATED AT 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, S.W., IN ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, as a result of the acquisition of certain real estate and improvements for new office facilities for County government operations, the Electoral Board of Roanoke County recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County the relocation of the Office of the General Registrar and the relocation and establishment of the Central Absentee Voter Election District to the Roanoke County administrative offices at 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., for all elections held within Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. 2. That the relocation of the Office of the General Registrar and the relocation and establishment of the Central Absentee Voter Election District to the Roanoke County administrative offices at 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W. for all elections held within Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to 1 take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~'7'~ cam'' ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney E. Elizabeth Leah, Registrar State Board of Elections Local Electoral Board I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 42793-17 Authorizing the Relocation of the Office of the General Registrar and Relocation and Establishment of Central Absentee Voter Election District adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, April 27, 1993. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ AT A RERG i~'R M HELD AT THE RO OKE OCOUNTPY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL REGISTRAR FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND, PURSUANT TO §§ 24.1-37 AND 24.1-233.1 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL ABSENTEE VOTER ELECTION DISTRICT IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES LOCATED AT 5204 BERNARD DRIVE IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~z-c t?-y~-~rn,~«~ v .~~~r v a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• BACKGROUND• By the adoption of Ordinance No. 121592-13, the Board of Supervisors authorized the acquisition of certain real estate and improvements located at 5204 Bernard Avenue for new office facilities for County government operations. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: §§ 2authorize dthe•relocation and establ shment ofral Central amended, Absentee Voter Election District. The first reading of this ordinance was held March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing was held April 27, 1993. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the attached ordinance authorizing the relocation of the office of the General Registrar and the relocation and establishment of a Central Absentee Voter Election District pursuant to provisions of the State Code. 1 CL? Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Respectfully submitted, V ~ t ~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 W~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT ,I,TUESDAYOKAPRILN27,p,D993ISTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL REGISTRAR FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND, PURSUANT TO §§ 24.1-37 AND 24.1-233.1 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL ABSENTEE VOTER ELECTION DISTRICT IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES LOCATED AT 5204 BERNARD DRIVE IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, as a result of the acquisition of certain real estate and improvements for new office facilities for County government operations, the Electoral Board of Roanoke County recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County the relocation of the Office of the General Registrar and the relocation and establishment of the Central Absentee Voter Election District to the Roanoke County administrative offices at 5204 Bernard Avenue for all elections held within Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. 2. That the relocation of the Office of the General Registrar and the relocation and establishment of the Central Absentee Voter Election District to the Roanoke County administrative offices at 5204 Bernard Avenue for all elections held within Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3 .~ ~' ~ r~ '~,- ~. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TTUESDAYO,RAPRILN27,A1993I8TRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE 42793-18 AIITHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE CASTLE ROCK VOTING PRECINCT FROM TIGHCS HOOLRPIIRSIIANT TOA §1024.1-37H OF THE 81950GCODEIOF H VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Electoral Board of Roanoke County has recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County the relocation of the polling place for the Castle Rock Voting Precinct from the Cave Spring Fire Station to the Cave Spring Junior High School for all elections held within Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. 2. That the relocation of the polling place for the Castle Rock Voting Precinct from the Cave Spring Fire Station to the Cave Spring Junior High School for all elections held within Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~ •°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE CASTLE ROCK VOTING PRECINCT FROM THE CAVE SPRING FIRE STATION TO THE CAVE SPRING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PURSUANT TO § 24.1-37 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~,~~ o~y.'~^~-~~-~f BACKGROUND• At a meeting of the Roanoke County Electoral Board held on February 19, 1993, the Board voted to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the voting place for the Castle Rock Precinct be moved from the Cave Spring Fire Department to the Cave Spring Junior High School. This move was requested in order to improve parking space availability during the election. There are 2,600 voters using this precinct. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: §§ 24.1-37 and 24.1-233.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorize the relocation and establishment of polling places for the various election precincts within the County. The first reading of this ordinance will be held March 23, 1993; the second reading and public hearing will be held April 27, 1993. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the attached ordinance authorizing the relocation of the polling place for the Castle Rock Voting Precinct. ectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 1 ~` / Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 ~,,~ '°` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE CASTLE ROCK VOTING PRECINCT FROM THE CAVE SPRING FIRE STATION TO THE CAVE SPRING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PURSUANT TO § 24.1-37 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Electoral Board of Roanoke County has recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County the relocation of the polling place for the Castle Rock Voting Precinct from the Cave Spring Fire Station to the Cave Spring Junior High School for all elections held within Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993; and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 27, 1993. 2. That the relocation of the polling place for the Castle Rock Voting Precinct from the Cave Spring Fire Station to the Cave Spring Junior High School for all elections held within Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\genetal\relocate.cav 3 ~- 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF HE ROANOKE OCOUNTY RADMINISTRAT oON OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T MEETING DATE' April 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM' Second Reading on Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and County Sewer Or stems e to Allow Alternative Discharging Sewage Sy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~ - -rvv~~~ ~,~,,~'~~ti''~1 ~~~ lJ BACKGROUND' • and First Reading on the On March 23, 1993 the Public Hearing ublic proposed amendment sts s f r d anyAtmodif ications e to w the nproposed comments or reque amendments. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a copy of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and County Sewer Ordinance to allow Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems in Roanoke County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1, That the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed amendments as prepared by the County Attorney. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance H ington, AICP Direct of anning and Zoning Approved, ..1 '~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~- ~~, ~ 2 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred Action Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens to _- ~_~~r,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T8E 80~ COIINTY ADMINISTRAT ON CENTERII~ Y' VIRGINIA, HELD AT T8E ROAN TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-19 AMENDIS DANCE OF PERMITSGFORCSEPTIC TANR81 "PROCEDURES AND FEES FO ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SEWAGEMSY EMSy~LLS" TO PROVIDE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING WHEREAS, failing septic systems pose a direct and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of this community, as well as a demonstrable financial hardship to the individual homeowner and citizen; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems constitute a method of sewage disposal as a replacement for a failing, pre- existing individual single family system where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems are not a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or for new construction since these systems are in conflict with the County's growth management policies, and pose a threat to the protection of water quality and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors have conducted several work sessions on this issue, and have considered the staff's "Summary Report on Alternative Discharging Sewage Disposal Systems"; and, WHEREAS, Section 62.1-44.15:3 of the Code of Virginia provides that no application for a permit to discharge of sewage into state waters shall be considered complete unless the local governing body of the affected jurisdiction certifies that the location and operation is consistent with all local planning, subdivision and 1 t ~ zoning ordinances (ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 15.1 of the State Code); and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health and the Virginia Water Control Board have developed regulations, policies and procedures to approve the installation and operation of alternative discharging sewage systems in conjunction with their review and approval by local governing bodies of counties, cities and towns in this Commonwealth; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.1-520, 15.1-856, 62.1-44.15:3, Article 1 of Chapter 6 of Title 32.1, and Chapter 11 of Title 15.1, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1) That Sec. 18-63.1 - Procedures and fees for issuance of permits for septic tanks, on-site sewage disposal systems and wells is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: (a) All buildings in the county in those areas where septic tanks are permitted shall have an on-site sewage disposal system alternative discharainct sewage svstem or septic tanks installed for the disposing of sewage and other human waste. (b) Before any on-site sewage disposal alternative discharctinct sewage svstem or septic tank systems or private wells 2 are constructed or installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land the construction or installation shall take place to secure a permit to be issued by the health department. Application for such permit(s) shall be made to the county's department of development and inspection, or its successor, upon forms prescribed by the health department. Before any alternative dischar in sewa e s stems are constructed or installed the a licant shall secure a s ecial use ermit as re fired b the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (c) There is hereby established a county permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each on-site sewage disposal system alternative discharginct sewacte system or septic tank. This permit fee, along with the state permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be paid to the treasurer at the time application is made for a permit and before the application will be processed by the health department. The state permit fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for construction of a private well likewise shall be paid to the treasurer at the time application is made for such permit and before processing by the health department. The treasurer shall not collect the state fee(s) from owner's whose family income is at or below the applicable income guidelines as provided under state regulation. (d) The health department shall review this permit application based upon the requirements and regulations promulgated pursuant to title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid for a period of fifty-four (54) 3 months from the date of issuance unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located. The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a substantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a permit. (e) In the event the health department denies a permit on the land on which the owner seeks to construct his principal place of residence, the county's portion of the state application fee shall be refunded to the owner. Such fee shall not be refunded by the county until final resolution by the health department of any appeals made by the owner from such denial. (f) Applications shall be limited to one site specific proposal. When site conditions change, or the needs of the applicant change, or the applicant proposes and requests another site be evaluated, and a new site evaluation is conducted, a new application and fee is required. (g) Any person, firm, or corporation violating any provisions of this section shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Further, any violation or attempted violation of this section may be restrained, corrected, or abated by injunction or other appropriate proceeding. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, 4 and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazauari, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police Chief John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Director, Parks & Recreation 5 Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Clifford D. Craig, Utility Dr. Margaret L. Hagan, Director, Health Department Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 6 ~_ ~'.~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-63.1 "PROCEDURES AND FEES FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SEPTIC TANKS, ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND WELLS" TO PROVIDE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING SEWAGE SYSTEMS WHEREAS, failing septic systems pose a direct and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of this community, as well as a demonstrable financial hardship to the individual homeowner and citizen; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems constitute a method of sewage disposal as a replacement for a failing, pre- existing individual single family system where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems are not a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or for new construction since these systems are in conflict with the County's growth management policies, and pose a threat to the protection of water quality and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors have conducted several work sessions on this issue, and have considered the staff's "Summary Report on Alternative Discharging Sewage Disposal Systems"; and, WHEREAS, Section 62.1-44.15:3 of the Code of Virginia provides that no application for a permit to discharge of sewage into state waters shall be considered complete unless the local governing body of the affected jurisdiction certifies that the location and operation is consistent with all local planning, subdivision and 1 . ca.. zoning ordinances (ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter it of Title 15.1 of the State Code); and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health and the Virginia Water Control Board have developed regulations, policies and procedures to approve the installation and operation of alternative discharging sewage systems in conjunction with their review and approval by local governing bodies of counties, cities and towns in this Commonwealth; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.1-520, 15.1-856, 62.1-44.15:3, Article 1 of Chapter 6 of Title 32.1, and Chapter 11 of Title 15.1, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1) That Sec. 18-63.1 - Procedures and fees for issuance of permits for septic tanks, on-site sewage disposal systems and wells is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: (a) All buildings in the county in those areas where septic tanks are permitted shall have an on-site sewage disposal systems alternative discharging sewage system or septic tanks installed for the disposing of sewage and other human waste. (b) Before any on-site sewage disposal, alternative discharging sewage s sy tem or septic tank systems or private wells 2 are constructed or installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land the construction or installation shall take place to secure a permit to be issued by the health department. Application for such permit(s) shall be made to the county's department of development and inspection, or its successor, upon forms prescribed by the health department. Before anv alternative discharging sewage svstems are constructed or _installed. the applicant shall secure a special use permit as required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (c) There is hereby established a county permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each on-site sewage disposal system alternative discharging sewage svstem or septic tank. This permit fee, along with the state permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be paid to the treasurer at the time application is made for a permit and before the application will be processed by the health department. The state permit fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for construction of a private well likewise shall be paid to the treasurer at the time application is made for such permit and before processing by the health department. The treasurer shall not collect the state fee(s) from owner's whose family income is at or below the applicable income guidelines as provided under state regulation. (d) The health department shall review this permit application based upon the requirements and regulations promulgated pursuant to title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid for a period of fifty-four (54) 3 ~- 8~ ~.. months from the date of issuance unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the .soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located. The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a substantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a permit. (e) In the event the health department denies a permit on the land on which the owner seeks to construct his principal place of residence, the county's portion of the state application fee shall be refunded to the owner. Such fee shall not be refunded by the county until final resolution by the health department of any appeals made by the owner from such denial. (f) Applications shall be limited to one site specific proposal. When site conditions change, or the needs of the applicant change, or the applicant proposes and requests another site be evaluated, and a new site evaluation is conducted, a new application and fee is required. (g) Any person, firm, or corporation violating any provisions of this section shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Further, any violation or attempted violation of this section may be restrained, corrected, or abated by injunction or other appropriate proceeding. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, 4 ~ - ~, ,~.. and the same hereby are, repealed. C:\W P51 \AGENDA\CODE\ALTDIS.SYS r a AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-20 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE 1992 ROANORE COIINTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING SEWAGE SYSTEMS WHEREAS, failing septic systems pose a direct and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of this community, as well as a demonstrable financial hardship to the individual homeowner and citizen; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems constitute a method of sewage disposal as a replacement for a failing, pre- existing individual single family system where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems are not a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or for new construction since these systems are in conflict with the County's growth management policies, and pose a threat to the protection of water quality and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors have conducted several work sessions on this issue, and have considered the staff's "Summary Report on Alternative Discharging Sewage Disposal Systems"; and, WHEREAS, Section 62.1-44.15:3 of the Code of Virginia provides that no application for a permit to discharge of sewage into state waters shall be considered complete unless the local governing body of the affected jurisdiction certifies that the location and operation is consistent with all local planning, subdivision and 1 zoning ordinances (ordinances adopted pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 15.1 of the State Code); and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health and the Virginia Water Control Board have developed regulations, policies and procedures to approve the installation and operation of alternative discharging sewage systems in conjunction with their review and approval by local governing bodies of counties, cities and towns in this Commonwealth; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.1-520, 15.1-856, 62.1-44.15:3, Article 1 of Chapter 6 of Title 32.1, and Chapter 11 of Title 15.1, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following amendments are being proposed to the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, which went into effect on December 31, 1992. I. The following use type description shall be inserted into the listing of residential use types contained in Section 30-29-2 in alphabetical order: ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING SEWAGE SYSTEMS - Any device or system which results in a point source surface discharge of treated sewage which is installed as a replacement system for a pre- 2 existing individual single family dwelling with flows less than or equal to 1,000 gallons per day on a yearly average. These systems are regulated by the Virginia Department of Health under a general Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit issued by the State Water Control Board. Systems which exceed 1,000 gallons shall be prohibited and shall not be considered a Utility Service, Major as described in this ordinance. II. The following use type shall be added, in alphabetical order, to the listing of uses requiring a special use permit in all of the Agricultural districts and in the R-1 district by amending Section 30-32-2(B) 1.5; Section 30-33-2(B) 1.5.; Section 30-34-2(B) 1.; Section 30-36-2(B) 2.; and, Section 30- 41-2(B) 2. with the following language: Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems III. The following provisions shall be added to Article IV, Use and Design Standards, Section 30-82 Residential Uses as Section 30-82-1.5: Sec. 30-82-1.5 Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems (A) Intent - The existence of untreated septage/sewage poses a clear and documented risk to public health and safety. The following provisions are intended to permit by special use permit the replacement of a failed septic system or other approved method of sewage disposal on property which contains a single family residence constructed prior to the date of 3 this ordinance and where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists. These systems are not considered by Roanoke County to be a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or new construction since they conflict with the growth management and resource protection policies contained in the County's Comprehensive Plan. However, these systems provide a more acceptable method of sewage disposal than no sewage disposal at all for residences which pre-existed this ordinance. (B) Special Application Requirements and Procedures: 1. Formal application shall be made to the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) in accordance with Section 2.12 of the VDH regulations. No application to Roanoke County will be accepted until a formal application has been submitted to and received by VDH. 2. In addition to the application requirements and procedures established in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, no application for a special use permit shall be considered until the information listed below is provided. a. a copy of the application form and material(s) submitted to VDH; b. written documentation from VDH that all other methods of sewage disposal permitted in Virginia have been investigated and that the alternative 4 discharging sewage system is the only remaining alternative for this improved property; c. documentation supporting conformance with the criteria contained in subsection (C) 2. below; and, d, the tax map number, name and mailing address of all property owners 1,000 feet downstream of the proposed discharge point along the fall line, based on the most recent real estate books for Roanoke County, or other municipality if appropriate. 3. In addition to all other notice requirements contained in Section 30-19 of this ordinance and otherwise required by law, all property owners located 1,000 feet downstream from the discharge point along the fall line shall be notified by first class mail at least ten days prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing. The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for this notification. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of postage. 4. Wherever possible, the review and consideration of a request for a special use permit shall be coordinated with the review procedures and requirements of VDH and the State Water Control Board (SWCB). (C) General standards: 1. All proposed alternative discharging sewage systems shall comply with the regulations and requirements of the State Water Control Board (SWCB) and the Virginia Department of 5 Health (VDH) pursuant to Section 62.1-44.2 et seq. and Section 32.1-163 and 164 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, as may be amended. The primary regulations which govern the permitting and installation of these systems are contained in the VDH regulations titled "Alternative Discharging Sewage Treatment System Regulations for Individual Single Family Dwellings (VR 355-34-400)." 2. A special use permit request shall only be considered when the following criteria is met: a. the residence is located more than 300 feet from an existing or proposed public sewer line, or when 300 feet or less, is otherwise unable to connect to public sewer due to topography or other physical constraint, as determined by the Director of Utility; and, b. the proposed alternative discharging sewage system is solely for replacing a failed septic system or other approved method of sewage disposal for a property which contains a single family residence constructed prior to the effective date of this ordinance. (April 23, 1993) 3. All systems proposed for use in Roanoke County shall be classified under Section 2.25 of the VDH regulations as having either preliminary or general approval for use in 6 4. 5. Virginia. Systems with experimental approval shall be prohibited in Roanoke County. In Roanoke County the location of the discharge point shall be limited to a year-round stream as defined in Section 3.2 of the VDH regulations, except as allowed in item (C) 5. below. Use of an intermittent stream or dry ditch as the discharge point may be permitted by the Board of Supervisors under the following conditions: a, the use of an intermittent stream or dry ditch is included as a specific condition of the special use permit; b. specific conditions are attached to the permit pertaining to additional levels of treatment, security of the discharge point, ownership of the property or a perpetual easement for a distance downstream from the discharge point, and other criteria essentially to protect the public health and safety; and, c. none of the conditions attached to the permit are less restrictive than the requirements contained in Section 3.7 of the VDH regulations unless specifically varied or modified by VDH and incorporated into the conditions of the special use permit. 7 6. Prior to issuance of an operating permit by VDH, a notice shall be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court advising future purchasers of the legal obligations associated with the method of sewage disposal located on the property. At a minimum, this shall include notice that the approval must be re-permitted every five years or upon change of ownership as required by VDH regulations, that a maintenance contract must remain in full force at all times, that VDH shall have the right of access to the property, and that the Health Department and Roanoke County do not warrant in any way the continued compliance with County, State and Federal standards and assumes no liability for the continued use of this technology for sewage disposal. This document shall be approved by the County Attorney's Office prior to recordation. 7. A copy of all formal and informal testing results required under Section 3.11 of the VDH regulations shall be submitted to the County Health Department and the County Department of Planning and Zoning, in addition to any other agency or location required by law. 8. Any special use permit approved by Roanoke County shall run concurrently with the operating permit approved by VDH. Upon expiration or revocation of the operating permit, the special use permit shall also expire or be 8 revoked. No special use permit shall be valid for a period greater than five years. 9. Requests to renew a permit of an existing system shall be considered as though it were a separate and new request for a special use permit and shall meet all of the requirements of this ordinance. Recurring requests for a permit due to repeated revocations of an operating permit or failure to comply with the requirements of the VDH regulations, including failure to maintain a current maintenance contract at all times, may be sufficient grounds for denial of a new special use permit by the Board of Supervisors. 10. Any violation of the VDH regulations for the construction, operation and maintenance of an alternative discharging sewage system shall be considered a violation of any special use permit approved under this ordinance 11. Any variance or waiver approved by VDH shall not automatically be binding on the Board of Supervisors in considering or approving a special use permit. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix 9 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazauari, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police Chief John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Clifford D. Craig, Utility Dr. Margaret L. Hagan, Director, Health Department Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 10 c.~- ~, d AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDCOUNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTEROONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKEPRIL 27, 1993 TUESDAY, ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REEFOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARG N SEWAGE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROVID SYSTEMS WHEREAS, failing septic systems pose a direct and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of this community, as well as a demonstrable financial hardship to the individual homeowner and citizen; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems constitute a method of sewage disposal as a replacement for a failing, pre- existing individual single family system where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists; and, WHEREAS, alternative discharging sewage systems are not a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or for new construction since these systems are in conflict with the County's growth management policies, and pose a threat to the protection of water quality and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors have conducted several work sessions on this issue, and have considered the staff's "Summary Report on Alternative Discharging Sewage Disposal Systems"; and, WHEREAS, Section 62.1-44.15:3 of the Code of Virginia provides that no application for a permit to discharge of sewage into state waters shall be considered complete unless the local governing body of the affected jurisdiction certifies that the location and operation is consistent with all local planning, subdivision and 1 ~ - ~'..~ zoning ordinances (ordinances. adopted pursuant to Chapter it of Title 15.1 of the State Code); and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health and the Virginia Water Control Board have developed regulations, policies and procedures to approve the installation and operation of alternative discharging sewage systems in conjunction with their review and approval by local governing bodies of counties, cities and towns in this Commonwealth; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.1-520, 15.1-856, 62.1-44.15:3, Article 1 of Chapter 6 of Title 32.1, and Chapter 11 of Title 15.1, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1993, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following amendments are being proposed to the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, which went into effect on December 31, 1992. I. The following use type description shall be inserted into the listing of residential use types contained in Section 30-29-2 in alphabetical order: ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING SEWAGE BYSTEMB - Any device or system which results in a point source surface discharge of treated sewage which is installed as a replacement system for a pre- 2 w-8.~ existing individual single family dwelling with flows less than or equal to 1,000 gallons per day on a yearly average. These systems are regulated by the Virginia Department of Health under a general Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit issued by the State Water Control Board. Systems which exceed 1,000 gallons shall be prohibited and shall not be considered a Utility Service, Major as described in this ordinance. II. The following use type shall be added, in alphabetical order, to the listing of uses requiring a special use permit in all of the Agricultural districts and in the R-1 district by amending Section 30-32-2(B) 1.5; Section 30-33-2(B) 1.5.; Section 30-34-2(B) 1.; Section 30-36-2(B) 2.; and, Section 30- 41-2(B) 2. with the following language: Residential Uses Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems III. The following provisions shall be added to Article IV, Use and Design Standards, Section 30-82 Residential Uses as Section 30-82-1.5: Sec. 30-82-1.5 Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems (A) Intent - The existence of untreated septage/sewage poses a clear and documented risk to public health and safety. The following provisions are intended to permit by special use permit the replacement of a failed septic system or other approved method of sewage disposal on property which contains a single family residence constructed prior to the date of 3 ~~~,~ this ordinance and where no other alternative for sewage disposal exists. These systems are not considered by Roanoke County to be a proven nor acceptable technology for general application or new construction since they conflict with the growth management and resource protection policies contained in the County's Comprehensive Plan. However, these systems provide a more acceptable method of sewage disposal than no sewage disposal at all for residences which pre-existed this ordinance. (B) Special Application Requirements and Procedures: 1. Formal application shall be made to the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) in accordance with Section 2.12 of the VDH regulations. No application to Roanoke County will be accepted until a formal application has been submitted to and received by VDH. 2. In addition to the application requirements and procedures established in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, no application for a special use permit shall be considered until the information listed below is provided. a. a copy of the application form and material(s) submitted to VDH; b. written documentation from VDH that all other methods of sewage disposal permitted in Virginia have been investigated and that the alternative 4 -, discharging sewage system is the only remaining alternative for this improved property; c. documentation supporting conformance with the criteria contained in subsection (C) 2. below; and, d. the tax map number, name and mailing address of all property owners 1, uuu =e~~ u~w==~~~~~-.. -- ---- proposed discharge point along the fall line, based on the most recent real estate books for Roanoke County, or other municipality if appropriate. 3. In addition to all other notice requirements contained in Section 30-19 of this ordinance and otherwise required by law, all property owners located 1,000 feet downstream from the discharge point along the fall line shall be notified by first class mail at least ten days prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing. The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for this notification. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of postage. 4. Wherever possible, the review and consideration of a request for a special use permit shall be coordinated with the review procedures and requirements of VDH and the State Water Control Board (SWCB). (C) General standards: 1. All proposed alternative discharging sewage systems shall comply with the regulations and requirements of the State Water Control Board (SWCB) and the Virginia Department of 5 r~v - `~ ~ Health (VDH) pursuant to Section 62.1-44.2 et seq. and Section 32.1-163 and 164 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, as may be amended. The primary regulations which govern the permitting and installation of these systems are contained in the VDH regulations titled "Alternative Discharging Sewage Treatment System Regulations for Individual Single Family Dwellings (VR 355-34-400)." 2. A special use permit request shall only be considered when the following criteria is met: a. the residence is located more than 300 feet from an existing or proposed public sewer line, or when 300 feet or less, is otherwise unable to connect to public sewer due to topography or other physical constraint, as determined by the Director of Utility; and, b. the proposed alternative discharging sewage system is solely for replacing a failed septic system or other approved method of sewage disposal for a property which contains a single family residence constructed prior to the effective date of this ordinance. (April 23, 1993) 3. All systems proposed for use in Roanoke County shall be classified under Section 2.25 of the VDH regulations as having either preliminary or general approval for use in 6 ~.+~' r 8r 4. 5. Virginia. Systems with experimental approval shall be prohibited in Roanoke County. In Roanoke County the location of the discharge point shall be limited to a year-round stream as defined in Section 3.2 of the VDH regulations, except as allowed in item (C) 5. below. Use of an intermittent stream or dry ditch as the discharge point may be permitted by the Board of Supervisors under the following conditions: a. the use of an intermittent stream or dry ditch is included as a specific condition of the special use permit; b, specific conditions are attached to the permit pertaining to additional levels of treatment, security of the discharge point, ownership of the property or a perpetual easement for a distance downstream from the discharge point, and other criteria essentially to protect the public health and safety; and, c. none of the conditions attached to the permit are less restrictive than the requirements contained in Section 3.7 of the VDH regulations unless specifically varied or modified by VDH and incorporated into the conditions of the special use permit. 7 ~" U.~G 6. Prior to issuance of an operating permit by VDH, a notice shall be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court advising future purchasers of the legal obligations associated with the method of sewage disposal located on the property. At a minimum, this shall include notice that the approval must be re-permitted every five years or upon change of ownership as required by VDH regulations, that a maintenance contract must remain in full force at all times, that VDH shall have the right of access to the property, and that the Health Department and Roanoke County do not warrant in any way the continued compliance with County, State and Federal standards and assumes no liability for the continued use of this technology for sewage disposal. This document shall be approved by the County Attorney's Office prior to recordation. 7. A copy of all formal and informal testing results required under Section 3.11 of the VDH regulations shall be submitted to the County Health Department and the County Department of Planning and Zoning, in addition to any other agency or location required by law. 8. Any special use permit approved by Roanoke County shall run concurrently with the operating permit approved by VDH. Upon expiration or revocation of the operating permit, the special use permit shall also expire or be 8 revoked. No special use permit shall be valid for a period greater than five years. g . Requests to renew a permit of an existing system shall be considered as though it were a separate and new request for a special use permit and shall meet all of the requirements of this ordinance. Recurring requests for a permit due to repeated revocations of an operating permit or failure to comply with the requirements of the VDH regulations, including failure to maintain a current maintenance contract at all times, may be sufficient grounds for denial of a new special use permit by the Board of Supervisors. 10. Any violation of the VDH regulations for the construction, operation and maintenance of an alternative discharging sewage system shall be considered a violation of any special use permit approved under this ordinance 11. Any variance or waiver approved by VDH shall not automatically be binding on the Board of Supervisors in considering or approving a special use permit. 2) That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51 \agenda\code\ahdis•zon 9 ~_~ AT A REGQLAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 42793-21 DECLARING A 100' by 115 PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TA% MAP NO. 76.16-1-14 TO BE SIIRPLIIS AND ACCEPTING/RE- JECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is hereby declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on April 13, 1993; and a second reading was held on April 27, 1993, concerning the sale and disposition of a 100' by 115' parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 76.16-1-14; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of Carolyn Freeman to purchase this property for 2 000 is hereby accepted,'.., .=} =? ; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital projects fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance John D. Willey, Property Manager ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "' MEETING OF THE BOARD OF LINTY RA MINISTRATION OCENTER AT A REGULAR COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO MEETING DATE• April 27, 1993 ING A 100' x 115' PARCEL OF REAL DA ITEM:• ORDINANCE DECLAR D AS TAX MAP NO. 76'16-1-IN HE AGEN ESTATE IDENTIFI SHELDON DRIVE) LOCATED OFF ROUTE 1666 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DOFFERC FORD THE SALE LOF p,ND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN SAME COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: , by 115 esting that the Board decs ldon Drive) in the Staff is requ parcel of real estate ~°a1tD strictoua d lidentifiesecond reading an Windsor Hills Maglst lus property and to adopt at 76.16-1-14 to be Burp the sale of this property. ordinance authorizing FISCAL IMPACTS• 1us property shall be The proceeds from the sale of this Burp paid into the capital projects fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No, 76,16-1-14 Staf f recommends tha a ~o a opd declare Tax aP t at second reading an ordinance to be surplus property, ro erty. authorizing the sale of this p P Approved by, Respectfully submitted, rr,.~,/ /~~~ Elmer C. Hodge ohn D. Willey County Administrator Property Manager 1 w-9 Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to __-- Motion by c:\~+P51\a8enda\males[\f~'ee~'~t Vote No Yes Abs Eddy - Johnson - Kohinke - Nickens - Minnix - - 2 L.~ ` ~j' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993 ORDINANCE DECLARING A 100' by 115' PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 76.16-1- 14 TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is hereby declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on April 13, 1993; and a second reading was held on April 27, 1993, concerning the sale and disposition of a 100' by 115' parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 76.16-1-14; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of property for accepted/rejected; and is hereby 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital projects fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp5 ] \agenda\realest\freeman to purchase this TELEPHONE CALLERS OPPOSED TO TAXPAYERS FUNDING FOR EXPLORE 1. Flo Lester 2. Hazel Gray 3. Evelyn Webster, Riverdale Section 4. Evelyn Hensley, 5141 Canter Drive 5. Ruth Mercer, 6557 Greenway Drive 6. India D. Brugh, 6352 Bunker Lane 7. Henry Bryant, West County 8. Roger Hite g. Mr. and Mrs. Larry Baker, 3643 Rutrough Road 10. Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Dean, 3647 Rutrough Road TELEPHONE CALLERS IN SUPPORT OF TAXPAYERS FUNDING FOR EXPLORE 1. Raymond Martin, 3906 Rutrough Road 2. Dean Lloyd, Doe Run Road 3. James H. Daughtridge, Vinton 4. Mrs. Lloyd, Hunting Hills 5. Susan Bright, 5692 Cynthia Drive 6. John Beasley, 2543 Mt. Pleasant Blvd 7. Ruth Dickerson, Route 2, Box 323 8. Mr. and Mrs. David Holliday 9. Mr. and Mrs. Timothy Martin, 3409 Rutrough Road 10. Douglas Poindexter, 3176 Ivey Lane Added since copy given to supervisors: 11. Louise & Boyd Shorter, Vinton 12. Babette Cribbs 13. Sandra Cole, 5848 Bridlewood Dr 14. Candy Smith, Burnham Rd 15. Danny Guard, 222 Howard Dr, Salem 16. Kathy Watkins, 5573 Cynthia Dr 17. Ron Weaver (Widen Rutrough) 6964 Briar Ridge, SW 18. Ms. Jerry Stefl, 3318 One Oak Road, SW 19. J. R. Hushour, 2111 Beavers Lane .~t0. w~'1rtrA. ~~~j ~ 3.Zb Q;7`?rr J' OF ~OANp'Fcc ~. z ,p a? 1838 C~~~tx~#~ ~~ ~~r~x~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMI NISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 April 30, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Gardner W. Smith, Chairman Roanoke Valley Resource Authority 3433 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Gardner: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 42793-4 approving the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Budget for the year ending June 30, 1994. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, April 27, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bj h Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance John R. Hubbard, Executive Director, RVRA John Parrott, Chairman, Landfill Board Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council ®Recycled Paper o`'a Aa~F ~• p z ~ J 2 a 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 April 30, 1993 P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Dorothy Shifflett 4789 Vintage Lane Salem, VA 24153 Dear Ms. Stiifflett: The members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service on the Library Board. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Roanoke County is fortunate indeed to have benefitted from your unselfish contribution to our community. As a small token of appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, `"`'`~ H. Ode~l "Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of HOM/bjh Enclosure cc: Spencer Watts, Director, Library ~~~~~ ~r~ ~~~.~.~2~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Chairman Supervisors ® Recycled Paper OF ROANp~~ 2 ~' J 2 a ~ 38 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 April 30, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KONINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Ms. Shirley Van Riper (703) 772-2005 5839 Catawba Valley Drive Catawba, Virginia 24070 Dear Ms. Riper: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Library Board to complete the unexpired four-year term of Ms. Dorothy Shifflett. This term will expire on December 31, 1995. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have the oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requested that you bring this letter with you at that time. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. HOM/bjh Enclosures cc: Spencer Watts, Director, Steve A. McGraw, Clerk, r P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Very truly yours, Sax H. Odell Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of Library Circuit Court ® Regded paper Chairman Supervisors -~ { , ,r ,~ o~ ~OANp~.~ a F. ~ p z ~ ~ a= 1838 Cn~~xxY# ~~ ~~xY~.~.~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Apri130, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL OISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Alan Rowbothan Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3300 Green Ridge Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Reverend Rowbothan: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, Apri127, 1993. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. Sincerely, / (/~ .mac-~.~.,~-- ~~~3y ~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper O~ ROANp,I-~ r; ~ A z ~ v a? 1 38 C~~~x~#~ o~~ ~.a~xxt~~E P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401 B-0798 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mary Allen ~~r/'~"-"` ' ( f~3~, 772-2005 ~r r Edward Kohinke Catawba District Supervisor March 30, 1993 LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT At the next regular Board of Supervisors Meeting, I will nominate Ms. Shirley Van Riper for appointment to the Library Board. Her address and telephone number: 5839 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba, Virginia 24070, phone 384-6709. By copy of this memo to them, I invite the Library Board Chairman and the Director of Libraries welcome her to the Library Board, and to communicate with her as needed. EGK/bjh cc: Spencer Watts Lessa Dalton ® Re~ydea Pacer MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors i FROM: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator DATE: April 20, 1993 SUBJECT: Wastewater Treatment Facilities At the April 13 meeting, Supervisor Eddy brought up several issues related to the expansion of the sewage treatment plant regarding the allocation of capacity and allocation of cost. When the consultant met with the Board and with the other three localities, there was agreement that the capacity allocation would be equal to what each locality requests. Mr. Craig recommended capacity to the year 2015 or 12 mgd. The cost allocation was divided into two components: payment on repair and replacement of items would be based on a percentage equal to the percent of flow over the last three years. The cost allocation for the plant expansion would be based on the amount of flow we are requesting. At the April 13 Board meeting, I also offered to have the consultant be available at the April 27th meeting to answer questions. if the majority of the board members feel it is necessary to meet with the consultant, l will make the arrangements to have him attend the meeting to discuss this issue in executive session. Because this is a negotiating process, staff needs the flexibility of working through terms that are acceptable to all the participating localities. I will brief the Board periodically on the progress and will bring the contract to the Board of Supervisors for approval. 5 April 1993 Ms. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke p.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Allen, of Supervisors 24018 National Freaervation Week will be celebrated acln8a the country May 9-15, and the first annual Vir3-15. Heritage Tourism Weeks will be celebrated May ment This point program between the Tourism Develop Group and the Department of Historic Resources will focus statewide attention for two weeks on Virginia's history. The Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation, Roanoke Regional Preservation Offforwardndtolothe historical societies are looking festivities in our community. This year's theme is "Preservation and Livable Communities: Make the Connection!" Preservation Week helps us to rehistoric and cultural resourcesrin our appreciative of communities. On behalf of the Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation, I am writing to request a proclamation by Roanoke County for National Preservation Week and have enclosed a sample. We would liervisorrscTuesdaye proclamation at the Board of Sup April 27, 1993 meeting at 3:00 p.m., and we request the opportunity to appear on the Board's agenda that afternoon. Dr. Deedie Kagey, President of the Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation will be accompanied by Dr. John Kern, Director of the Roanoke Regional Preservation Office. They would like to briefly address the Board. Thank you for your assistance. If you should need to telephone me, my number is 342-9289. Sincerely, ~ ~~ r t. Martha B. Boxley, ~' Acting Director Enclosure cc: Dr. Deedie Kagey Dr. John R. Kern P.O. Box 1558 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24~~7 Iti ~i li vnmea o~ aervciea saner ROANOKE VALLEY PRESERVATION F~~! Ij ~' ~ , :, y: RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMDEN AOT BROAD STREORTATION RICHMOND, 23219 April 6, 1993 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: Y C - ~ l~t/~.~.t.~9 ~' As requested in your resolution dated February 9, 1993, the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby approved, effective April 2, 1993. LENGTH ADDITION NORTH BURLINGTON Route 1860 (Tinkerdale Road) - From 0.20 mile Southwest Route 1806 to 0.33 mile Southwest Route 1806 Sincerely, ~ ~~ i~~ Ray D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 0.13 Mi A ~yyo A f.7 N ''' `p ~~ D N ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ° ~ cn r71 A Z 7C E {D ~ ~ m y O r r' ~ C "+ N C ~ A ~ A ° D 3 m o .Z l r ~ ~ ~ o -i - i '. .. A ° t ll m m~m m ~ o 3 m 0 p+~3 O NZ ~m ~y mm o Aid-~iQpO-+z ° N N m m .-~ m m -i ~.3-. Oyu Y.3. v,4~1 ^ ryZ 41m ~D~`Dy N I H I I C I d -~ ^ r N .P N UI 00 N d °o r ° ° ° r ~~ UI ° (°il (JI rn n , 1 , , 1 UI o ~ G 0 0 o Z ° c ~ o -t w rn N o N o ~ o o ° ^ 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 ° O ..i PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board o ~~upervisors of Roanoke on April , 1993, at the Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, County Administration Center, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ~ OUNTYOAND F PURSUANT TO §§ 24T1E GENERAL REGISTRAR FOR ROANOKE 37 AND 24.1-233.1 OF THE 1950~D OESTABLISHMENTA OF ACENTRAL AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION ABSENTEE VOTER ELECTION DITEDI AT I5204H BERNARD K DRIVE NIN ADMINISTRATIVE VIRGINIA LOCA ROANOKE COUNTY, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ~C~INCT IFROM THE CAVEI SPR NG EFIRE THE CASTLE ROCK VOTING P STATION TO THE CAVE SPRI OF VIRGINIAIG AS AMENDED RSUANT TO § 24.1-37 OF THE 1950 CODE All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~ ~ ~G~--~ ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: 93 GL~~'"`r.. 13,1943 Marc 3 , 993 C~/ ~~ (R9.3 A 1 ~ Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors p, O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MS. MARY ALLEN ~~ a '~ 3-~~ _ 9~~ 9: S3 ~~ 3_ ~ ~ 93 L:/a ~'~ PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board ~ ~ upervisors of Roanoke on April 1993, at the Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting Roanoke, County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Vir inia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold g a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ~ OUNTY AND F PURSUANT TO §§ 24T1E GENERAL REGISTRAR FOR ROANOKE 37 AND 24.1-233.1 OF THE 1950~DOESTABLISHNIENTA OF AACENTRAL AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION ABSENTEE VOTER ELECTION DITEDI AT 15204 H BERNARD K DRIVE NIN ADMINISTRATIVE VIRGINIA LOCA ROANOKE COUNTY, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RELONCT IFROM THE CAVEI SPRING EFIRE THE CASTLE ROCK VOTING PRE STATION TO THE CAVE SPRING VIRGIN A G AS AMENDED RSUANT TO § 24.1-37 OF THE 1950 CODE OF All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Qom. ~ 01~~-~~~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Virginia Roanoke County, Publish on the following dates: ~~ e~ ~~~~~ /_3 Mar 0, 1993 . 1993 ~ ~ A i 6. ~~ Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors p, 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MS. MARY ALLEN ~s a 3_,8_q ~ 3 93 ,~ ~ >6 County of Roanoke Revised Budget Calendar FY 1993-94 3/9/93 Budget work session with the March 9, 1993 Board of Supervisors Public hearing to allow citizen March 9, 1993 discussion on real estate, (Evening Session) personal property and machinery and tools tax rates. Adoption of real estate, March 23, 1993 personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. Joint budget work session with April 6, 1993 the Board of Supervisors and (Special Meeting) the School Board. Presentation of County and School budgets. Budget work session with the Board of Supervisors and the Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs. April 13, 1993 Budget work session with the Board of Supervisors. (Evening Session) Public hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. April 27, 1993 Budget work session with the Board of Supervisors. Adoption of FY 1993-94 budget for both County and Schools.* May 11, 1993 First reading of the Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 25, 1993 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. * If additional work sessions are necessary the adoption of the budget could be postponed until May 11, 1993. LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, in the Community Room Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton of the Roanoke County Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Azusa Street Ministries for a Special Use Permit to allow ctionxof related facil ties,glocated building and the future constru at 312 Azusa Street, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 8, 1993 ,~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Tuesday, April 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Trustees of Azusa St. Ministries, U.P.C.I. c/o James F. Douthat Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove PO Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT p.O. BO8 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Warren E. Booth for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing church building for Sunday School rooms and fellowship hall, located at 8269 Bradshaw Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 8, 1993 ,~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Tuesday, April 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: To be paid on delivery by: Warren E. Booth 467 Dark Run Road Elliston, VA 24087 (703) 268-1205 BEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 The hearing of the Avenue, Special center, LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board of Supervisors will hold a public Roanoke County in the Community Room at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Roanoke County etition of Jitendra Desai for a Roanoke, VA, on the p and community Use Permit to construct a CavelSlring Magisterial District. Located on Branico Drive, P A copy of this application is Department of Planning and Zoning, VA. available for inspection in the 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Dated: April 8, 1993 /`~ - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Tuesday, April 20, 1993 To be paid on delivery by: Jitendra S. Desai 4985 Fox Ridge Road Roanoke, VA 24014 (703) 989-3515 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DV 4018 p~O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ublic The Roanoke County Board of Supervisor in the Community Room A ril 27, 1993, hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, P 3738 Brambleton of the Roanoke County Administration Center, Gilley for a Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Giles M. Avenue, club to construct Special Use Permit to expand an indoor arc ery ocated on Timberview Road, Catawba Magisterial an addition, District. A copy of this application is av 8 grambleton Avenuel Roanokee Department of Planning and Zoning, 373 VA. Dated: April 8, 1993 ~~ ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Tuesday, April 20, 1993 To be paid on delivery by~ Giles M. Gilley p0 Box 13948 Roanoke, VA 24034 (703) 342-1831 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROO OBO% 29800,pROANORE,DVAA24~s P. LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board of Supervisors will hold a public The Roanoke County p, ril 27, 1993, in the Community Room hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, P 3738 Brambleton of the Roanoke County Admin et tion of CRoanoke County Planning Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the p located at 1701 Commission to rezone 4.75 acres from I-2 to R-2, Underhill Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 8, 1993 `~~~~, ~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Tuesday, April 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 SAMPLE F' RnGI_AI~IA+C' I f71r1 Pr^e:ser"vati~~~n helps pr^~=wide ~ deeper" WHEREASa I-iist~~~ric ite1Y Arner^ic:ar~ heritage9 ~_rYider"star.diYig ~~~f the diver^sity ~=~f' ~-~~_rr" ~_rr~ip- and of WHEREAS: Hist~-~r"i.c F'r"eserVat i~~~n er~har~cesetr"~ p~l ltar~abcit ies t'=~ fr~~ari lar"ge c~~~mrii~_rr, i t i es acr"~='ss Ar~ier^ i s ~, srnall, r"~_rr"al far"ming t~~~wr~s; and W Freser~Vati~~~r~ Week. 1'~9~ ar~d thtie fir^st anr~~_ral Vir"gir~la HEREASe "_ ,-, ~w~r"t~_rY~ity f~_~r citizens ~=~f all Heritage T~,~~_Lrism Weeks pr ~-wide PP life t ~~~ make the c~annect i ~~~r, bet weer, h i st ~-~r l c ~t het i c, eY~v i rc~nmeY~t a 1 and eC'GYiC~Ci11 c we 1 ~. ages ar~d wal k.s ~u~f preser^vat i~~~n and the aea r ar~d beiY~g ~~~f their c~_~rnrn~_rnitie~g Make the WHEREA5 a ~~ Pr"e5er"Vat 7. ~_~Yt aYiCl L 1 V ab l e C~~~r~7ri1~_ln 1 t :L eS : I^'`^ _~r~s~~~r'ed C:-~ ~_~ , ~~ is the theme f~~~r" F'reser^vat i~_~n Week. 1'93, P L~r~nr~ect i ° Y.. ~ ~ar~~w~ke Reg i ~ Ana 1 ~='r"eser~vat i~~~r~ E=~_~~_indat i~:~m, R° by tl'1e R~~~an~~~ke Val leV '^~ Y~ar~er"Vat 1G~Yi ~M~r^gar~l°'at 7.~w~ns In ~::~r"eservat i~ ~r~ Off ice, ~r~ther 1 -cal. p " the R~~~ar~c~4~.e Val ley, ar~d the Illat i~_~nal l"r"~..rst fr~r" His't~-uric rW~r~ser^vat i car°~. _ k I~I~,~w, ttreref~~~r^e, T, Lee ~. G~_~~Lr~ty ~~~aard ~~~f S~_Lper^Vis~=~r"so pr~w~claim May .=~""1Jq 199~~, as Eddy, Ghairr~~an ~~,f the R~~~ar~~_~ .e R~_~aY~~r~ke, Virginia, d~~ hereby V1ftCa:INlA HERI°I"AGE TGl.1R15tYl WEEW.S aY~d call ~_rp~~~n ~=~~_Lr^ citizens t~-~ r~ec,~~gni~~e and participate ire this special ~~:~bser^vance. /"' f ~ _. a. . 0~ POANp,I.~ L ~ ~ Z ~, z o a 1838 C~~~xxt~~ ~~ ~.~~~~~.~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 January 22, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODC E•SPRIZ G MAGI NSTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NIGKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Alan Rowbothan Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3300 Green Ridge Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Reverend Rowbothan: On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board Meetings in the past. We would again like to call on you to present the invocation on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, at 3:00 p.m. For your information, I am attaching a leld the second and fourth Tuesdays of the3monthhand meetings are h the invocation is always given at 3 p.m. If the date requested above is not convenient, please call me at 772-2005. I will be fcalouiw uld prefer another datehis time is acceptable to you o y The Board members are aware of how busy your schedule is, and they appreciate your volunteering your time to offer God's blessing at their meetings. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~~ 1~ 3 ~~ ®R~yaaa P~ Number 239671 Posted: 03/25/93 11:57 Type: Regular Message Received: Subject: Budget WOrk Session with Volunteers From: MHA - Mary Allen To: TCF - Tommy Fuqua Tommy: ECH has rescheduled the April 6 Budget Work Session from 3:00 p.m. to 8:30 a.m. because of conflicts with several board members. We will need to reschedule the meeting with the Volunteer FIre and Rescue Chiefs to another Board meeting date. Please check with them to see what might be convenient. There will be three members absent for the April 13 meeting so we don't want to schedule it for that date. Possible dates are April 27 or May 11. I called and left a phone message for you regarding this, but you were out to lunch and probably when you get back I'll be out to lunch. OF aOAN ~~ ~, ~ 2 p J ? a ~3 A w,urr ~ n¢ eua rya ROANOKE COUN'T'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GJ~ 'TION AGENDA ~~5 APRIL 6, 1993 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THIS IS A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF A BUDGET WORK SESSION WITH COUNTY STAFF AND THE SCHOOL BOARD 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 835 A.M. C~.o~~x~#~ ~f ~~~xxto~te A. OPENING CEREMONIES (8:30 A.M.) B. COUN'T'Y BUDGET PRESENTATION ECH PRESENTED PROPOSED BUDGET PARKS & REC DIRECTOR: * ECH TO MEET WITH OHN CHAMBLISS AND P&R STAFF TO SEE IF POSITION SHOULD BE FILLED THIS YFAR OR COULD WAIT UNTIL NEXT YEAR. SEWER RATE INCREASE: * LBE. BI..T EGK FELT SEWER RATES SHOULD BE INCREASED INSTEAD OF SUBSIDIZING FROM GENERAL FUND, * ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT ON IMPACT AND USES FOR SEWER RATE INCREASE AT 4/27 MEETING ~~~~ J( ® Recyded Paper BULK-BRUSH COLLECTION * LBE ASKED FOR RESPONSE TO HIS MEMO REGARDING BULK AND BRUSH COLLECTION. * HCN AND EGK DID NOT SUPPORT A 2ND MONTHLY BRUSH PICKUP * ECH WILL BRING BACK MORE INFO AT 4/27 BUDGET WORK SESSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: * BIT AND EGK DO NOT SUPPORT INCREASED CONTRIBUTION TO VISITORS BUREAU. * LBE ASKED ECH TO FIND OUT IF OTHER LOCALITIES WERE ASKED TO FUND EXPLORE. * FM DID NOT SUPPORT FUNDING FOR EXPLORE UNTIL IT'S SELF SUSTAINING. * ECH WILL GET COPY OF BUDGET REQUEST FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: * ECH TO GET COST OF INCREASED PAYMENT OF SICK LEAVE FOR 4/27 WORK SESSION. * HCN AND LBE ASKED FOR COMPARISON ON PAYMENT OF UNUSED SICK LEAVE WITH OTHER LOCALITIES. * HCN ASKED FOR LIST OF EMPLOYEES WHO ARE TEMPORARY OR PART-TIME AND HAVE WORKED FOR 40 HOURS PER WEEK OVER ONE YEAR. RECESS AT 10:30 A.M. C. SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET PRESENTATION (10;45 A.M.1 FRANK THOMAS CALLED SCHOOL BOARD TOGETHER - 4 MEMBERS PRESENT HCN ASKED FOR COMPARISON OF PAYMENT FOR UNUSED SICK LEAVE WITH OTHER SCHOOL SYSTEMS. i ~! ,~ ' APRIL 23 - Meeting - Goodlatte APRIL 27 Proc.-Virginia Heritage Tourism Week RESO Apprec - Penn Forest Playground Explore Presentation Funds for engineering consultant - Reg. Treatment Facilities Finance Agreement with Richfield Retirement - Connection Fee Fees for Service-Roanoke Air Show Recognize 25-yr.volunteer f&R - Sj~ '~ Retain Fees in Sheriff's Office Approve 1993-94 Budget-RVRA Request from Foti to purchase well lot Budget Work Session - ~. ~ ~ ~- WS with F&R Chiefs ^- S-: ~j Q PH- Alternative Sewage Treatment Overall Budget ~~ - -LGi VJi--vrvcri~ a ate. ~ ~~ Relocate Registrar's Office Change Voting Precinct Spec Use Permit - Archery Club rezone from I-2 to R-2 - Underhill Avenue Special Use - Religious Assembly Special Use - Sunday School Special Use - Expand Church Building 2nd - Fee Schedule for Parades, etc. Acquisition of 4.0 acres for Spring Hollow Offer to purchase real estate Amend Zoning Ord. and Code re alternative sewage systems Request for WS-Drainage Program and Bond Projects 1st -Modifications to Sewer Use Standards - Report for J. B. Goria Exec Session-RVRA invitation to Salem 120 discussion of ECH ~~~~~~~ C.UG7 s C~u~-#u" March 30, 1993 Fuzzier Re your memo saying that you were going to ask the County Administrator to meet with you in April, August, and December to review previous Board actions, etc. Mr. Eddy and Mr. Kohinke replied, said they thought it was a good idea, and they would like to be included. Mr. Hodge says two of the Supervisors will miss the April 13 Board meeting, and he wondered if you would like an executive session scheduled for this purpose at the April 27 Board meeting. ~u ~t cc - Mary Allen ~~ PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on Tuesday, April 27, 1993, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: Ordinance declaring the following property to be surplus and authorizing the sale of said property: Tax Map No. 76.16-1-14 - Well Lot off Sheldon Drive All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Q.(M- Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: Saturday, April 24, 1993 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN ~~~~ r--- lS-~q3 /~~/.3 ~. d___~ _ • ROANOKE COUNTY ~~.~ ~ Id" USE ~~`~ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL ~~~ j~ ~ ~C~~~ l' 11~ ~ ~ Phone:j0~~ - ~j ~1~~ 1, Applicant's Name: ,,~ Address: J~~/~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ .~ '`' (~ Q~nv~ ' ~nc ~ ~-~ ~ ` J Zip • vc~_ (~ ~ 2 . Property owner's name ~I~ ~~ti~ ~- ~~R ~ ~•' ~'~~ ~ ~ -- Address : ~jl y~ ~a 1 ~~ o_w4 ~ Phone.: -' _ Pro ert ~ ~ ~ J~ -- ~ ~ ~~•( 1 J ~3,. Location •f t Y • . ' •~ ~ Sri .Cp~yt ~~G~ ~'-(! S -; Si~e of property 3~ .acres/sq.ft. Sfize of proposed special exception use-' ~.~~5 .•acres/sq.ft. ,,~ax Map ~ : (owl • o ~ ~3- « Old Tax Map ~ ,: ~ ~J 5. Zoning Classification: C ~' -..,~' ~_„~. 6. Magisterial District Location: ~~Ae~„~a. 7. Existing Land Use: ~' 1c~S~ n ~~~F~~~`'~ 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: ~ car--ltii~~~~~~ I~~~,~- ~\"'"S``~` 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Value of Land Value of Proposed Buildings Value of Machinery & Tools ~ ,Number to be Employed 11. Check Completed Items: 82" x 11" plot plan Consultation y List of adjacent property owners ~ Letter of Application .~~~-~ ~_ Filing ..fee .made payable to "County of Roanoke" $1,875 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill _ ~,~ method garbage and, refuse site $40 All other Special -T~=pti-err Uses 12, ate of Application: ~ / ~/~ l~ 1 G`am' 13. Applicant's Signature: To: \~~. ~~. ~~ ~ h ~ ~ n s ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o l ~~.~0~-~- ~ ,~ u-- J I DON'T SAY IT -WRITE IT From: Date: a ~ ~~ ~- ~~~' .^ n: O~ ~OANp~~ G z ~ ~ ~ 1838 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS TERRANGE L. HARRINGTON, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING February 23, 1993 Mr. C. Coleman G. Edmonds '~ ~ • Gentry, Lockes, Rakes and Moore " P.O. Box 1018 Roanoke, VA 24005 ecial Use Permit (Commercial Indoor Amusement) RE: Sp Dear Mr. Edmonds: riy office has reviewed the i to the characteristics ofythe February 16, 1993 letter pertaining proposed business to be locreVdeWtof3 thiseSinformation its is lmy Virginia. Based upon our that the use proposed by your opinion as Zoning Administrator, client is a place of Commeitiariordtor op rationt inn itsoproposed require a Special Use Perm p configuration. My decision is based upon the number of pool tables in the proposed establishment and the amount of ograownfcalculationsedthe the "pool" aspects of the business. By Y square footage devoted to the pool table area exceeds that devoted to the dining/bar area. ,If your client wishes to begin operation prior to obtaining the special use permit for Commercial Indoor Amusement, my opinion is that he/she should provide no more than one pool table prior to obtaining the permit. You may appeal this decision to the Roanoke County Board of Zoning Appeals within 30 days of the date of this letter. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely `~~ Terranc~. H ington, AICP Director~of Planning P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2068 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® Rec/ded Paper For staff use only rcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirRSTnts of the requested district? Does the pa 11= N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FI YES x NO NO -•--__ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. NO X_ g proffered with this requests YES qV~g , nditions bein i•~•:•' tit'jiti;i~i~itit°l`I`I:l'l:lit: if rezoning re tare co . ............. • • • • ; .... ; •t~ti't'ti'k~li! 1:~;1;:;!:lttil:iitltiU! l~liiliEi~i'iii; i+f1,r.Ri:1`Li t.liii~iiili' :a:;,6r-:i;i~i•: k.E, :i ?:.:i~Slie:!:El:i:riiat:~iaet{~s :~;iL•~?u;ap;.i.~a;~it~iil;;i.ii,l,a4; il;; ;~;3:1t1;S }16t..::.t.S:i [iii:4iii la9tifitirq: if~':ri,'liv.:.....-.-. •-• : - .;.n, t.n:.:.: .............. • • -i'"'i' ` ` ``"~''""':•:'~'.;.:-~• ~ nin Ordinance in order to; ~~ ~~ of the Roanoke County Zo g Variance of Sectian(sl ..iv r1C Is the application complete? Please check if7Eclosed, APPLICATION WILL NOT BE Al:t;tr i ~v t~ ~~~ ~ -- THESE ITEMS AFIE MISSING OR INCOMPLE ~,s v ass v s u o ~e Application f6s Rl6 V Consultation 8 112" x 11 " rem Proffers, if applicable App{ication Metes and bounds description Adjoininfl property owners Water and sower application Justification 'f that ! am either the owner of the property or the owner's eDent or contract purchaser and ! hereby certr Y am acrinp wr'rh the knowledge and consent of the owner. ANY BY + A ~~, ITS ATTORNEI BLUE ~ I vC~E i ".fTERNI~T I al~lAl- LIMITED L~ I L I T~ ~~ ~.,, ~~•~•"•- - - ~'` ~ -`• for Staff fJse Only ' Proposed Zoning: AV uee Type: Proposed Land Use: OFFICE For Staff Use Only: Applicant B e Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use parmi~eea u1e e;fa e d Ple se answer the foldlowin4 7h justification for the change inote$ ble ° Useba1dditiolnal spaceyif necessary. questions as thorouflhly as p e gx lain haw the request furthers the purposes of the Zonin$ Of elation in thetzon ng ordina cel.as the Pleas p licable zoning distract clan - purpO5e found at the beginning of the app i n a V i I I age Center area . This rezoning will remove a cgrrr~ercial conditional zoning The AV zoning is more compatable with the existing land uses in the surrounding area. It will enable a basically vacant building to once again be utilized in a manner without changing the character or nature of -the construction. . in how the project con#orms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Please expla Comprehensive Plan. The project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the County Coi~rehensive Plan in that the Village Center district allows for general office use. The roject will further remove a corm~ercial'conu~e°n~hezO~~rehensiveePla perty and p atable zon rag leave the property ~n amore comp ' s the impactls) of the request on the property itself, the waterlseweop gads, schot S'surroundinq Please descr~b area, as well 8s the impacts on public services and facilities, inclu m9 parks/recreation, and firelrescue. The proposed rezoning will have no negative impact on public services and faciliti including water/sewer, roads, schools, parksThecrYOt~sedaofficeeiseacless -'}ntenseposed office use will have a minimum of traffic. p Po zoning than the C-2 zoning with conditions and will therefore have no negative impact o the adjoining properties. LAW OFFICES NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE FERGUSON , OSTERHOUDT, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TELERHONE 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W. 703-774-1197 CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT p p, gOX 20068 FAX NO. MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT VIRGINIA 703-774-0961 ROANOKE, MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018 G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD ELLEN KUO MAR 2 G 1997 Terrance Harrington ~ ~~~NG ~ZO~y~HG Director of Planning ~ R A~CK~ CpU~iT`l County of Roanoke p, O. Box 29800 _ Roanoke, Virginia 24018 .' Dear Terry: ,• Enclosed please find the Rezoning Application for Blue Ridge International for parcel 95.01-llication which chasebeen signed by the Roanoke County Rezoning App on behalf of the the property owner. I have signed the copy of the plat, a copy applicant. We have also provided to ro ert coas well as a list of of the legal description for the p p Y adjoining property owners. We have not includeand theeusenwill be Application since this is an existing building conducted within that existing building. Also enclosed is a check for the required filing fee. As you know, this request for rezoning would change the zoning on the property from C-2 with conditions (allowing the sale of used vehicles, antique and classic vehicles) to the AV District. It is my belief that this rezoning will put the property more in line with the appropriate zoning for the area. The permitted uses in an AV District would more closely align th clients anticipatedaoffice of the neighborhood and certainly, mY use of-the property, falls well within the permitted uses. Should you need anything further, please advise. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~_ Edward A. Natt EAN/cnh COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. S~ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX 1703) 772-2030 or` V bE , Proposed Zoning: ~-~'P'a~ ~ ~~~,~`~ Proposed Land Use: REL1~~"' For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontaulRED FIRSTnts of the requested district? YES / _ NO _ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES / NO __ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. NO nin request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES ~_ - f rezo 9 Variance.of.Section(s) .• .. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ~o ~~ rvs V / ~grn~'r~ ~s v Application fee ,~ Consultation 8 1 l2" x 11 " concept plan ,~ :. proffers, if applicable Application ... Metes and bounds description Adjoining property owners ''~~ Water and sewer application Justification '" ,~n~-RQ° To t~ 7~ !hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the .owner's agent or contract purchaser and sent the owner• _ am acting with the knowledge a ~~ /~ Owner's Signature: __ °~ ---- -- . Fnr Staff USe Only J`~ ~ J for Staff Use Only: Case Number ~o--tt-~ ~-~VC'~C~P~~-ice - ~ V ~A Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and sP safet s aPdrgeneral welfare.d Please answer the foldlowing justification for the change in terms of public health, Y questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of t stZoncing Ofcationen the zon ng ordinancel,as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning d SEE pr-Rptc.NrE~. ~z Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. S~ ~~'~~~ ~"~~ -ice. R,OANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY 3433 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 (703) 772-2130 ~, ~_ ,yam ~ ~;: ,.~., _ .1 ~' ' i. `'~~. '` ~; MEMORANDUM ~ ~ ~`"`~.,',Ji, JAN ' a~ ~!'v i'1 1 TO: Terry Harrington Director, Planning & Zoning" ~ ' FROM: John R. Hubbard - . Executive Director ~O I z •' . - DATE: January ~, 1993 SUBJECT: Smith Gap Special Exception Permit I have had the occasion to review the SpecialdEn~p~ the acreage t be 640e The actual the Smith Gap Landfill and noticed that the perms acreage originally acquired was surveyed to tota1752.012. In addition~ldand ~aat~ W ~ ~e facilitate the entrance to the property and the tipper building and rail y decision to utilize rail for transporting the waste. I have attached a plat showing the original purchases and the subsequent purchases to accommodate the rail. I believe that the intent behind the permit allo e th~s clarified by Roanoke CounRyanoke Valley Resource Authority may be best served to ha Please let me know what action is required, if any, to resolve these issues. Attachment T~~ ~ APR- ~ ~ 7~~ ~ m~n!'~ ~~ r._ j ~"~J -~...-.~C e. ~. , St°S S~ o r1 MEMORANDUM TO: John Willey ~~~,- ~ ~ 3 FROM: Mary Allen `~~ ~' ^~_ --_ DATE: March 30, 1993 SUBJECT: Surplus Property -Tax Map #87.11-1-28 Purchase Offer-Foti Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare a board report for the attached offer to purchase a well lot. Please let him or me know which Board meeting we should schedule this item for. CC: Lee Eddy Elmer Hodge Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig Tim Gubala ~~.~X~~k_..c sue, ~ `~~-~-'''y`.J ~~ _r _~_~_ fot% Ryan, low¢a & Co. Victor F Foti, CPA David B Lowen, CPA A Profess~onai Corporation of Certified Public Accountants William H Qrumfleld, Jr., CPA John D. Willey, ASA Director Real Estate County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Assessments March 26, 1993 Re: Lot-Tax Map #87.11-1-28 Dear John: Robert K. Flynn, CPA J. Phillip Windschitl, CPA This letter constitutes an offer from the Storage Bins, Inc. to purchase the above referred surplus property. Since the recent reassessments I feel that less uncertainty about the value of the lot might exist. In my original letter of August 27 I made an offer of $4500 for this lot based on the purchase price that we paid for the adjoining and surrounding three acres. Based on the current reassessment, it appears that this property has a value of approximately $19,000 to $20,000 per acre. Therefore, we are offering $6,000 for the one-fourth acre well lot. We are offering a premium since this lot has road frontage. I would appreciate hearing convenience. VFF/pc p/cys: ~ee Eddy Elmer C. Hodge Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig Tim Gubala Mike Warner from you at your earliest Sincerely, C~c~ Victor F. Foti Secretary-Treasurer The Storage Bins, Inc. 418 South Jefferson Street • Boxley Building P O Box 12765 Roanoke, Virginia 24028-2765 • (703) 344-9246 Fax (703) 344-9264 SCHOOL FOR IDS PROGRAM D• NEW BUSINESS 1• Request for Authorization to Submit a Pinkard C Planning Grant to the Virginia Department of Housin and Community Development. (Janet Scheid, Plannin & Zoning) g R-4--_93=2 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-EGI I RF ~ NAYS-NONE ABSENT-BT T ~~ CN 2. Request for A Consultant for Upgradrea for the Fund Engineering Treatment Facilities. (Clifford Craig, Utl°naDi Wastewater _ _ ty ector) DEFECTED BY FOLI,O~~11Vjr UN AYES-LBE WING VOTE NAYS-EGA ~'M ABSENT BT T H('~v PRESENT 3• Request for A PProval of Finance Agreement with Richfield for Payment of Water Connection Fee. (Clifford Craig, 3 Utility Director) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AYES- LBE-:FM NAYS-EGK ABSENT-B ~T.HCN a a u+~iJL ~rJ~ M~TORITY VOTE BY THE FrrrrulN uns n~, LBE MOTION TO RECONSIDER _ per AYES-E_ G T,BE~ NAYS-NONE ABSENT-B -T.HCN 4• Request for Approval of Agreement with East Tennessee Natural Gas Company for Constructing a Gas Line at Spring Hollow Reservoir. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) A-4-13_ 93-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT AYES-EGI~LBE,FM NAYS-NONE ABSENT-B .T.HCN 5• Request for Approval of Addendum to Appalachian Power Company Agreement for Purchase of Electricity for Spring Hollow Reservoir. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) A-41393-4 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-EGK r BED NAYS-NONE ABSENT-B T HCN E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 4 M. REPORTS LBE MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 6 & 7 - UW WITH HCN AND B T ABSENT 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance EGK ASKED IF FUNDS HAD ALREADY BEEN SPENT FOR RUTROUGH ROAD. ECH TO CHECK AND REPORT BACK. 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of 3/31/93. 5. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 6. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1993. ASKED WHY COUNTY MUST BORROW SHORT TERM WHEN THERE IS 18 M IN INVESTMENTS. N. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to Modify Sewer Use Standards for Application to Private Sector SSE/R Program 1ST READING SET FOR 4/27/93 LBE ASKED THAT ALTERNATIVES BE INCLUDED THAT WOULD NOT TERMINATE SERVICE BUT ESTABLISH SURCHARGE. BOARD CONSENSUS THAT ORDINANCE DEFINE THAT APPEALS BE LIIViITED TO DETERNQNATION BY UTILITY DIRECTOR OF I&I AND WILL NOT INCLUDE APPEAL OF PENALTIES. O. EXECiJTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1- 344 (a) 9