HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/24/1993 - RegularF ~ Ap ~'
w~ .
Z
2
~ 38
(~.~~xxtt~ ~~ ~.~~xxt~C~
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
AUGUST 24, 1993
~'A4T 6 711E Y!E fm~
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meetin
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesda Regular
P•m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 Y t 3:00
month. Deviations from this schedule wll be announcedth Tuesday of each
Individuals with disabilities who require assistance ors ecial a
in order to participate in or attend Board of Superviso P meetirrangement
programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County °g or other
Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that ~ ouear~,contact the
48-hour notice so that proper arrangements may be made, P rde at least
A• OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1• Roll Call.
ROLL CALI, AT 3:05 P.M.
HCN ABSENT _ ARRIVED AT 3:30 P.M.
2• Irnocation: The Reverend Samuel W. Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
3• Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B• ~QE STS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANG
R OF AGENDA I'T'EMS E THE
i
® Recyded Paper
FROM AGENDA.
C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Clifford and Betty
Rhodenizer for Designing the Roanoke County Seal.
R-82493-1
EGK MOTION TO ADOPT
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
RHODENIZERS WERE PRESENT TO ACCEPT
2. Resolution of Appreciation to Deidre Lee and Mike Zirkle
for Their Actions on July 2, 1993.
R-82493-2
EGK MOTION TO ADOPT
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
MS. LEE WAS PRESENT MR. ZIRKLE WAS NOT
3. Recognition of Receipt of the Governmental Finance
Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting.
ACCEPTED BY DIANE HYATT AND VINCENT COPENHAVER
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Resolution of Support for a Grant Application
to the Virginia Recreational Trails Fund Program. (Jim
Jones, Assistant Director of Parks)
R-82493-3
EGK MOTION TO ADOPT
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
2. Request for Financial Support of the 1993 Alonzo Stagg
Bawl in Salem, Virginia. (Tim Gubala, Director of
Economic Development)
2
A-82493-4
BLT MOTION TO APPROVE $2500 CONTRIBUTION FROM ECON.
DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
3. Authorization to Apply to the VPSA for .Fall 1993
Financing of School Projects (Diane Hyatt, Director of
Finance)
R-82493-5
BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT RESO
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
4. Consideration for Additional VDOT Revenue Sharing
Projects for Fiscal Year 1992-93. (Arnold Cwey, Director
of Engineering & Inspections)
A-82493-6
LBE MOTION TO APPROVE ALT #2 -APPROPRIATING 25 000 AND
APPROVING PRIORITY LIST WITH FUNDING FOR #2 AND 3 FROM
BOND FUNDS.
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
1. Request for Joint Work Session with the School Board on
September 14 to Discuss Capital Planning. (Diane Hyatt,
Finance Director)
HCN MOTION TO SET WORK SESSION SET FOR 914 93- URC
BAYES WILSON DESCRIBED WORK SESSION
LBE ASKED FOR INFORMATION IN ADVANCE
BL,T ASKED FOR NEW PRINTOUT ON DEBT SERVICE.
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
3
BSI LMOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC
HEARING FOR 9/28/93 - URC.
1. Ordinance to rezone 0.85 acres from R-1 to C-2 and
obtain a Special Use Permit to Operate a Used
Automobile Dealership, Located at the South Side of
Peters Creek Road West of the North Park Office
Complex, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition
of William L. Hite.
2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand
Northside High School, located at 6758 Northside High
School Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the
Petition of the School Board of Roanoke County.
3• Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Erect a
152 foot Self-supporting Broadcasting Tower, located on
Honeysuckle Road, 1.75 Miles from Intersection of
Honeysuckle Road and Poor Mountain Road, Windsor
Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of
Appalachian Power Company.
4. Ordinance to Amend the Official Zoning Maps by the
Adoption of Revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps Prepared
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be
Effective October 15, 1993, and to Make Minor
Amendments to Section 30-74, Floodplain Overlay
District, of the Zoning Ordinance to Reflect the New
Maps, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Planning
Commission.
K FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing the Lease Extension in Connection
with Office Space in the New County Administration
Center. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney)
0-82493-7
HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AND WAIVE 2ND READING
URC
4
2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-34,
Display of Decal Generally, of Article II. County Vehicle
License of Chapter 12 of the Roanoke County Code to
Expand the Requirement for Display of County Vehicle
Decals. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County
Attorney)
HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 9/14/93
URC
3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 10-33, Real
Estate Services, Section 10-34, Professional Services, and
Section 10-36, Personal and Business Service Occupations,
of Article I. In General, of Chapter 10, Licenses, to
Exempt Gross Receipts Less Than $3,000 from Business
License Tax Liability. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant
County Attorney)
LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 9/14/93
URC
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance 82592-12,
The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County by the
Adoption of Certain Provisions Concerning Amateur
Radio Towers in the Various Zoning Districts of the
County. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director)
0-82493-8
BL,T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
1 PERSON SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF ORD
2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary
Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line
and the Starkey Road Water Project. (Clifford Craig,
s
Utility Director)
0-82493-9
BI+T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-8,
Adouting of State Law of Article I, of Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul
Mahoney, County Attorney)
0-82493-10
LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
4. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Article V. B_ngo
Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, Amusements of the
Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
0-82493-11
HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD
URC
J. A.PPOIIVTMENTS
1. Grievance Panel
HCN WILL CONTACT CECIL HILL
2. Industrial Development Authority
HCN WILL CONTACT MR. VINYARD
HOM WILL CONTACT MR. BRANCH
3. Virginia Western Community College Board
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
6
WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IIv THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WII,L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
R-82493-12
BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO
URC
1. Approval of Minutes -July 13, 1993, July 27, 1993
2. Confirmation of Appointments to Community Corrections
Resources Board and the Social Services Advisory Board.
3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit From the Cave
Spring Elementary School PTA.
4• Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for
Lease/Purchases of Fire & Rescue Vehicles
5. Request for Acceptance Olney Road and Corllens Lane
into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary
System.
6. Authorization to Pay Legal Fees for Firetruck Litigation
with Grumman Aircraft Company.
7. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer Easement in Connection
with the Route 11 Project of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
8. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer and Water Line Easements
in Connection with the T.C.E. Projects.
I+ REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
notice regarding referendum on elected school boards. PMM responded
affirmahvely. (2) Asked for reconsideration of referendum for school
boards appornted by BOS. FM placed on agenda after "Reports"
Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Announced he attended meeting at Ms.
Castle's hoase to discuss issues with residents includin consolidation
annexation. and problems in core cities such as lack of developable land.
Asked for support from Board members to set up a joint meeting with City
of Roanoke to discuss these problems and potential solutions. Following
d~scuss~on on best approach to proceed, HOM advised that he and ECH will
discuss with Mayor Bowers and Bob Herbert.
Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Attended LGOC on 8/15 8/17. Received
material which he will share with BOS. (2) Advised he felt there was a
shortage of rnformahon from depts such as Police Dept. Asked for rem
from various departments with statistical data, etc. to be placed under
"Reports." (3) Advised there is a need for a cat ordinance in his area
Board consensus to consider cat ordinance.
M. CITIZENS' CONIlViENTS AND CObBVIiJNICATIONS
NONE
N. REPORTS
BIT MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE IJVV
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Report on 1991 Water Project
5. Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste
Facilities.
6. Report on Bond Projects
7. Report on Regional Cooperative Effort for Providing Aid
to the Midwest Flood Victims.
8. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy as of (a) May 31, 1993;
(b) June 30, 1993; and (c) July 31, 1993.
RECONSIDERATION OF REFERENDUM ON SCHOOL BOARDS
APPOINTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HCN MOTION TO RECONSIDER ISSUE APPROVED ON 7 27 93 -
DEFEATED
AYES-BLJ,HCN
NAYS-EGK,LBE,FM
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning prospective
businesses or industries where no previous announcement has
been made of the business or industry's interest in locating in
the community; (7) to discuss legal matters requiring the
provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings
by staff members concerning contract negotiations: expansion of
the sewage treatment plant; and pending litigation: Sigmon,
Boone & Beasley cases; and (1) Discussion of a personnel
matter; evaluation of the County Attorney.
HCN MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 4:30 P.M
URC
P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
R-82493-13
BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT AT 7.05 P.M.
URC
9
EVENING SESSION
Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate
an After School Day Care Program, Located at 3520
Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon
the Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. (Terry
Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning)
0-82493-14
EGK MOTION TO ADOPT
URC
R CITIZEN COD~IlI~NTS AND C011~IlVIUIVICATIONS
1. The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board will
speak regarding Roanoke County's request for an audit of
funds collected by the volunteer Fire and Rescue Stations.
THIS ISSUE WAS NOT DISCUSSED
2. 5 CITIZENS SPOKE REGARDING WRITTEN
RESPONSE FROM ECH TO DAVID SLIGH
CONCERNING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING
ORDINANCE AND SOIL & EROSION CONTROL,
THEY EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT ECH COPIED
LETTER TO MR SLIGH'S EMPLOYER AND FELT
THIS WAS INAPPROPRIATE.
NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION TAKEN
S. ADJOiTRNMENT
HCN MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 7:20 P.M.
io
OF ROAN ~.~
~, ' A
o z
a
1838
C~~ixx~#~ a# ~.o~tx~~.~~
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
AUGUST 24,1993
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement
in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meeting or other
programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the
Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least
48-hour notice so that proper arrangements may be made.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Samuel W. Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
® Recycled Paper
C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Clifford and Betty
Rhodenizer for Designing the Roanoke County Seal.
2. Resolution of Appreciation to Deidre Lee and Mike Zirkle
for Their Actions on July 2, 1993.
3. Recognition of Receipt of the Governmental Finance
Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Resolution of Support for a Grant Application
to the Virginia Recreational Trails Fund Program. (Jim
Jones, Assistant Director of Parks)
2. Request for Financial Support of the 1993 Alonzo Stagg
Bawl in Salem, Virginia. (Tim Gubala, Director of
Economic Development)
3. Authorization to Apply to the VPSA for Fall 1993
Financing of School Projects (Diane Hyatt, Director of
Finance)
4. Consideration for Additional VDOT Revenue Sharing
Projects for Fiscal Year 1992-93. (Arnold Covey, Director
of Engineering & Inspections)
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
1. Request for Joint Work Session with the School Board on
September 14 to Discuss Capital Planning. (Diane Hyatt,
Finance Director)
2
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
1. Ordinance to rezone 0.85 acres from R-1 to C-2 and
obtain a Special Use Permit to Operate a Used
Automobile Dealership, Located at the South Side of
Peters Creek Road West of the North Park Office
Complex, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition
of William L. Hite.
2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand
Northside High School, located at 6758 Northside High
School Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the
Petition of the School Board of Roanoke County.
3. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Erect a
152 foot Self-supporting Broadcasting Tower, located on
Honeysuckle Road, 1.75 Miles from Intersection of
Honeysuckle Road and Poor Mountain Road, Windsor
Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of
Appalachian Power Company.
4. Ordinance to Amend the Official Zoning Maps by the
Adoption of Revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps Prepared
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be
Effective October 15, 1993, and to Make Minor
Amendments to Section 30-74, Floodplain Overlay
District, of the Zoning Ordinance to Reflect the New
Maps, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Planning
Commission.
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing the Lease Extension in Connection
with Office Space in the New County Administration
Center. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney)
I.
2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-34,
Display of Decal Generally, of Article II. County Vehicle
License of Chapter 12 of the Roanoke County Code to
Expand the Requirement for Display of County Vehicle
Decals. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County
Attorney)
3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 10-33, Real
Estate Services, Section 10-34, Professional Services, and
Section 10-36, Personal and Business Service Occupations,
of Article I. In General, of Chapter 10, Licenses, to
Exempt Gross Receipts Less Than $3,000 from Business
License Tax Liability. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant
County Attorney)
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance 82592-12,
The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County by the
Adoption of Certain Provisions Concerning Amateur
Radio Towers in the Various Zoning Districts of the
County. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director)
2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary
Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line
and the Starkey Road Water Project. (Clifford Craig,
Utility Director)
3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-8,
Adopting of State Law of Article I, of Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul
Mahoney, County Attorney)
4. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Article V. Bin o
Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, Amusements of the
Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
4
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Grievance Panel
2. Industrial Development Authority
3. Virginia Western Community College Board
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of Minutes -July 13, 1993, July 27, 1993
2. Confirmation of Appointments to Community Corrections
Resources Board and the Social Services Advisory Board.
3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit From the Cave
Spring Elementary School PTA.
4. Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for
Lease/Purchases of Fire & Rescue Vehicles
5. Request for Acceptance Olney Road and Corllens Lane
into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary
System.
6. Authorization to Pay Legal Fees for Firetruck Litigation
with Grumman Aircraft Company.
7. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer Easement in Connection
with the Route 11 Project of the Virginia Department of
5
Transportation.
8. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer and Water Line Easements
in Connection with the T.C.E. Projects.
L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlV~UIVICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Report on 1991 Water Project
5. Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste
Facilities.
6. Report on Bond Projects
7. Report on Regional Cooperative Effort for Providing Aid
to the Midwest Flood Victims.
8. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy as of (a) May 31, 1993;
(b) June 30, 1993; and (c) July 31, 1993.
6
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning prospective
businesses or industries where no previous announcement has
been made of the business or industry's interest in locating in
the community; (7) to discuss legal matters requiring the
provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings
by staff members concerning contract negotiations: expansion of
the sewage treatment plant; and pending litigation: Sigmon,
Boone & Beasley cases; and (1) Discussion of a personnel
matter; evaluation of the County Attorney.
P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
EVENING SESSION
Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate
an After School Day Care Program, Located at 3520
Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon
the Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. (Terry
Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning)
R CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COA~IlVIUNICATIONS
1. The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board will
speak regarding Roanoke County's request for an audit of
funds collected by the volunteer Fire and Rescue Stations.
S. ADJOURNMENT
~'
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF TH8 BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE
COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TIIESDAY, AUGIIST 24, 1993
RESOLIITION 82493-1 OF APPRECIATION
TO CLIFFORD AND BETTY RHODENIZER
FOR DESIGNING THE ROANORE COIINTY SEAL
WHEREAS, in 1968, Clifford Rhodenizer, a Virginia State
Trooper and resident of Roanoke County, believed that the County of
Roanoke needed an identity to distinguish it from the other Valley
governments; and
WHEREAS, Betty Rhodenizer designed a seal for the County based
on the idea provided by her husband; and
WHEREAS, the seal depicts a Native American, representative of
the people who hunted and fished in the Roanoke Valley, along with
the scenic beauty of the area; and
WHEREAS, the Rhodenizers prevailed upon the Board of
Supervisors to consider adoption of the seal as the symbol of
Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, in June, 1968, twenty-five years ago, the seal
designed by the Rhodenizers was officially adopted by the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors, and has been used since that time to
identify Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its appreciation to Clifford
and Betty Rhodenizer for designing the seal and for bringing their
ideas to the County for consideration; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
congratulates the Rhodenizers on the twenty-fifth anniversary of
the adoption of the seal.
,~
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
~•
Mary H. len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
.~..
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AIIGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
TO CLIFFORD AND BETTY RHODENIZER
FOR DESIGNING THE ROANORE COUNTY SEAL
WHEREAS, in 1968, Clifford Rhodenizer, a Virginia State
Trooper and resident of Roanoke County, believed that the County of
Roanoke needed an identity to distinguish it from the other Valley
governments; and
WHEREAS, Betty Rhodenizer designed a seal for the County based
on the idea provided by her husband; and
WHEREAS, the seal depicts a Native American, representative of
the people who hunted and fished in the Roanoke Valley, along with
the scenic beauty of the area; and
WHEREAS, the Rhodenizers prevailed upon the Board of
Supervisors to consider adoption of the seal as the symbol of
Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, in June, 1968, twenty-five years ago, the seal
designed by the Rhodenizers was officially adopted by the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors, and has been used since that time to
identify Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its appreciation to Clifford
and Betty Rhodenizer for designing the seal and for bringing their
ideas to the County for consideration; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
congratulates the Rhodenizers on the twenty-fifth anniversary of
the adoption of the seal.
- ~.
~`
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVIBORB OF ROANORE
COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINIBTRATION CENTER
ON TIIEBDAY, AIIGIIBT 24, 1993
REBOLIITION 82493-2 OF APPRECIATION TO DEIRDRE LEE AND
MIRE ZIRRLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS ON JIILY 2, 1993
WHEREAS, on July 2, 1993, Alana Nicole Fuller was at the
Castle Rock Swim Club in Southwest Roanoke County when she began
choking; and
WHEREAS, Deirdre Lee, a resident of Roanoke County and a nurse
at the Veteran's Administration Hospital, acted quickly and
professionally to assist Miss Fuller, and through her actions was
responsible for preventing a tragedy; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Lee was aided in her efforts by Mike Zirkle, the
lifeguard at the pool; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkle should be commended for their
immediate reaction to a potential life threatening situation, and
for their willingness to help another individual without concern
for their own well being.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its appreciation to
DEIRDRE LEE and MIKE ZIRKLE for their quick response and assistance
to Alana Fuller in her time of need.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
~•
Mary H. A len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
tom,. - ,.2.,.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Resolutions of Appreciation to Deirdre Lee and
Mike Zirkle for Their Actions on July 2, 1993
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Ms. Jena S. Holland requested that Deirdre Lee and Mike Zirkle be
recognized for their assistance to her daughter, Alana Nicole
Fuller.
Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkle acted quickly and professionally to aid Miss
Fuller when she was choking while at the Castle Rock Swim Club.
Resolutions for Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkle have been prepared, and they
have been invited to attend the Board Meeting to accept the
resolutions.
Appro
~~/~
Elmer C. H dge
County Admin' rator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
C-z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AIIGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO DEIRDRE LEE AND
MIRE ZIRRLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS ON JULY 2, 1993
WHEREAS, on July 2, 1993, Alana Nicole Fuller was at the
Castle Rock Swim Club in Southwest Roanoke County when she began
choking; and
WHEREAS, Deirdre Lee, a resident of Roanoke County and a
nurse at the Veteran's Administration Hospital, acted quickly and
professionally to assist Miss Fuller, and through her actions was
responsible for preventing a tragedy; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Lee was aided in her efforts by Mike Zirkle,
the lifeguard at the pool; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkle should be commended for
their immediate reaction to a potential life threatening situation,
and for their willingness to help another individual without
concern for their own well being.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its
appreciation to DEIRDRE LEE and MIRE ZIRRLE for their quick
response and assistance to Alana Fuller in her time of need.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER C - -~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Receipt of the Government
Finance Officers Association Certificate of
Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has been awarded the Government Finance Officers
Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in financial
reporting for the County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR). The CAFR is judged by an impartial panel to meet standards
including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure"
to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential
users and user groups to read the CAFR.
Accepting the award for Roanoke County will be Finance Director
Diane Hyatt. A Certificate of Achievement will also be presented
to Vincent K. Copenhaver, Chief Accountant, as the individual
designated as primarily responsible for preparing the CAFR.
~-
Elmer C. Ho e
County dministrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
F
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVIBORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, GELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,1993
RESOLIITION 82493-3 APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF VIRGINIA
RECREATION TRAILS FUND APPLICATION.
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia:
WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, it is necessary that a request by
resolution be received from the local government in order that the
Virginia Recreation Trails Fund program provide a grant for a trail
project at in the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting an application
for a recreational trail project at Goode Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke,
Virginia requests that the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation accept the application for improvement of the greenway
at Goode Park.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
hereby agrees to pay direct labor cost for planning and design,
right-of-way, and construction of these projects, and that, if the
County_ of Roanoke, Virginia subsequently elects to cancel this
project, the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to reimburse
the Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation for the total
amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the
Department is notified of such cancellation.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
~"
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS:
ABSENT:
None
Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Jim Jones, Assistant Director of Parks
John C. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO .
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE.COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
.MEETING DATE:
August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM:
Request for Resolution to support grant from the Virginia
Recreational Trails Fund Program.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The Virginia Recreational Trails Fund Program is a grant program
established for the purposes of providing and maintaining
recreational trails and trails-related facilities. It is funded by
the National Recreational Trails Act, which establishes a program
for allocating funds to the States for recreational trails and
trail-related projects. The program will be administered by the
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
in consultation with the Department of the Interior. The state
agency which is responsible for administering the program in
Virginia is the Department of Conservation and Recreation {DCR).
Grant funding may be provided to private individuals,
organizations, city governments, county governments, or other
government entities, but must consider guidance from the Virginia
State Trails Council (VSTC). VSTC advises DCR on trails-related
issues. Council members, appointed by DGR, represent trail user
groups including: ATV, bicycle {off road and paved surface), four-
wheel drive, hike (close-to-home and long distance}, equestrian,
motorcycle, cross-country ski and water-related trail use.
A minimum of 30% of funding received
used for motorized recreational trail
non-motorized recreational trail uses,
discretionary; however, preference
proposals with the greatest number
purposes and/or provide for innovative
annually by a State must be
uses, 30% must be used for
while the subsequent 40% is
must be given to project
of compatible recreational
recreational trails corridor
sharing. This is a reimbursement program, meaning that the
sponsoring agency should be capable of financing the project while
requesting periodic reimbursements. Projects may be funded 100%.
~ -l
2
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Since the grant money available for our type of park projects is
only 7096 of the total grant the amount requested needed to be
reasonable to compete for funding. It was for this reason that the
Goode Park Greenway was submitted as a project.
As of August 3, 1993 DCR has given preliminary approval for the
project. It must now be approved by the Federal Highway
Administration. Once Federal approval is obtained DCR will arrange
a meeting with our Department to discuss the details of
administering the project.
This project is a Greenway between two existing county parks,
Stonebridge Park and Goode Park. There is a path worn through the
area by residents, demonstrating the need to properly develop
pedestrian and bicycle access. The following is needed to properly
develop the trail:
1) Gravel surface materials.
2) Signs for crossing residential streets.
3) Trail marking and trail head.
4) Building up trail shoulder.
5) Accessibility.
6} Pedestrian bridges.
Other projects were received but their cost of implementation made
them prohibitive at this point. The next application dead line is
July 1, 1994. The staff intends to identify other eligible
projects and pursue funding through this program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This year $138,198 will be available for grants in Virginia. This
is a reimbursement program; therefore, the grant recipient must pay
100% of the cost of an item before submitting a request for
reimbursement for eligible costs. Recipients will not be
reimbursed for expenses prior to federal approval. A request for
reimbursement may not be submitted to DCR for less than 25% of the
total grant amount. The final 25% of the total grant amount will
be withheld until the project is completed and inspected by DCR.
The total grant request for the project is $4,000. The County's
cost for this project is anticipated not to exceed $11,000 for in
kind expenses which include labor and equipment. No additional
appropriation is needed. Normally, requests are processed and
funds dispersed within 30 days.
3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~ -
Staff recommends as follows:
That the board endorse by resolution the grant application.
Respectfully Submitted,
im Jones
Assistant Director of Parks
Approved,
C~ _- .~.-l ~~
Elmer C Ho
County Administrator
Action
Approved ( ) Motion by
Denied ( ?
Received ( }
Referred
to --
Minnix
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
liltrails~aBa-g
. 11 -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24,1993
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF VIRGINIA
RECREATION TRAILS FUND APPLICATION.
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia:
WHEREAS, in accordance with, Virginia Department of
Conservation-and Recreation, it is necessary that a request by
resolution be received from the local government in order that the
Virginia Recreation Trails Fund program provide a grant for a trail
project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting an application
for a recreational trail project has reviewed the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke,
Virginia requests the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation accept the application for improvement of the greenway
at Goode Park.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
hereby agrees to pay direct labor cost for planning and design,
right-of-way, and construction of these projects, and that, if the
County of Roanoke, Virginia subsequently elects to cancel this
project, the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to reimburse
the Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation for the total
amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the
Department is notified of such cancellation.
ti
ACTION NO. A-82493-4
Item No . ~ -'~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Request for contribution for Amos Alonzo Stagg
Bowl
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The City of Salem has secured a bid to host the Division III NCAA
National Championship Amos Alonza Stagg Bowl football game in Salem
Stadium on Saturday, December 11, 1993. This game will be held in
Salem for the next three years. A regional effort on the part of
the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, businesses, and
local governments is being organized to support and host the game
in the Roanoke Valley.
Available statistics and information about the Stagg Bowl are:
The game will be covered live nationally on ESPN.
• The Holiday Inn-Tanglewood will be the headquarter's
location of one of the teams.
• Salem Stadium has a capacity of 8,000 seats. The tournament
is reserving 1,000 tickets for each team.
• Advance ticket sales are strong in the region even though
the competing teams won't be identified until December 4,
1993.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The Tournament Committee has requested that Roanoke County consider
sponsorship for the Stagg Bowl. Funds are available within the FY
93-94 economic development budget for special events.
~ 2
ALTERNATIVE3•
1. Fund the Game Day Brunch on December 11, 1993, (as suggested
by the Tournament Committee), at a cost of $3,500.
2. Fund a Silver Corporate Patron Package for $2,500.
3. Take no action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors fund
Alternative #2 and authorize a $2,500 Silver Sponsorship (Corporate
Patron Package) for the Stagg Bowl. Future appropriations for this
event should be considered at budget time and budgeted as a
"tourism and tourism related" contribution from the Transient
Occupancy Tax receipts.
Respectfully submitted: Approved:
Timothy W. Gub la, Director Elmer C. H ge
Economic Development Department County Adminis ator
-----------------------------
No Yes Absent
ACTION
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x
Denied ( ) motion to approve $2,500 Johnson x
Received ( ) contribution from Econ. Kohinke x _
Referred Development Budget Minnix x _
to Nickens x
Attachment
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Econ Dev
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
-~
CHAMPIONSHIPS
1993 AMOS ALONZO STAGG BOWL
NCAA DIVISION III NATIONAL FOOTBALL CHAMPIONSHIP
Game Day Brunch
The Host Committee of the 1993 Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl would like to
present for your consideration that your company host the "Game Day
Brunch" to be held at the Salem Civic Center, Saturday, December
11, 1993. This event is in conjunction with the championship game
and will be attended by the representatives of both participating
teams, NCAA officials, local dignitaries, and other corporate
patrons. The general public will be allowed to purchase tickets to
this event and expected attendance should exceed 150 attendees. As
the official host of this prestigious event, your company will
receive the following:
(1) Signage at the "Game Day Brunch".
(2) Your company name on the tickets and invitations issued for
this event.
(3) Twenty-five choice tickets to the Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl.
(4) Twenty-five complimentary invitations to the "Game Day
Brunch".
(5) Ten complimentary invitations to the "Uptown Country Gala" or..
Thursday, December 9th.
(6) Ten complimentary invitations to the "Championship Luncheon"
on Friday, December 10th.
(7) One-half page black and white ad in the championship game
program.
(8) Four preferred parking permits for the championship game.
(9) Special recognition on the civic center marquee one week prior
to the game.
(10) Special recognition from the Salem Host Committee at the
brunch .
The total cost for hosting this exciting event is $3,500.00.
- 1 -
"-~i
CHAMPIONSHIPS
1993 AMOS ALONZO STAGG BOWL
Saturday, December 11, 12 noon-Salem Stadium
SILVER CORPORATE PATRON PACKAGE
1. Fifty championship game tickets in a prime location
2. Opportunity to purchase twenty additional tickets
3. Six V.I.P. badges to signify your involvement
4. Six invitations to the Thursday Evening Reception
5. Six invitations to the Championship Luncheon on Friday
6. Six invitations to the Game Day Brunch
7. Half page advertisement in the official game day program
8. Three parking passes in special parking area for Championship.
9. Recognized as silver patron at all official functions.
The total cost for this Silver Patron Package is $2,500.00 and may
be billed either now or as late as January 10, 1994.
- 2 -
-,
J° ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION 82493-5 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY (VPSA) FOR FALL 1993
FINANCING OF SCHOOL PROJECTS
WHEREAS, The Roanoke County School Board and the Board of
Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County")
have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue
general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed
$2,310,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public
school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the Bonds to the Virginia
Public School Authority ("VPSA");
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA:
1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed
to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the Bonds to
the VPSA at the Fall 1993 VPSA bond sale.
2. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools
Attachment A
Exhibit 1
CAPTIAL COSTS - Alternative 6
Purchase Traveler's and Move Schools to RCOS
November 17, 1992
Traveler's Building
Cost of Building
Partitioning, Carpet and Painting
Telephone and Computer
ADA Work
NorthsidefRCOS
Northside Construction
RCOS Renovations
Telephone and Computer Instalation
Renovation of Existing Buildingg
School Administration & Annex
RCAC
Total Capital Costs
Issuance Cost
Debt Service Reserve
Total Bonds
~-~
Fall '93
Revenue Bonds VPSA
$2,400,000
210,000
200,000
10.000
2,820,000*
$1,910,000
250,000
150.000
2,310,000
750,000
150.000
900,000
3,720,000
100,000
500,000
$4,320,000
2,310,000
$2,310,000
* Based on this number, the cost per square foot for the Traveler's Building
is $45.36.
5
r A.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~ -3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to apply to the VPSA for the Fall 1993 Financing
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~"~
BACKGROUND: On November 17, 1992, the Board of Supervisors approved a plan to relocate the
County Administration Offices and the School Administration Offices. At that time the Board
approved the plan to include $2,310,000 in the Fall 1993 VPSA Bond Sale related to classroom
additions at Northside High School and renovations at the Roanoke County Occupational School to
accomplish the relocation of the School Administration Building. Attachment A is an excerpt from this
November 17, 1992 Board report which outlines the detail of this project
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The VPSA has recently mailed their application packets for the
fall VPSA bond sale. Attachment B is a calendar of events for this Fall 1993 sale. Applications are
due to the VPSA by September 9, 1993. Accompanying these applications should be a formal
resolution from the School Board and the Board of Supervisors approving this application to the VPSA.
The School Board adopted the attached resolution on August 12, 1993. The attached resolution will
need to be approved by the Board of Supervisors in order to complete the VPSA application package.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County Board of Supervisors agreed to pay the debt service related to this
VPSA bond sale. Funds are included in the current 1993-94 budget for debt service related to this
issue for this fiscal year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution to authorize the
application to VPSA to be included in the Fall 1993 bond sale for the amount of $2,310,000. Staff is
preparing for a joint work session with the School and County Boards on September 14, 1993 for
School Capital projects.
"~
Respectfully submitted,
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
Attachments
Approv d by,
Elmer C. Hod
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied () Eddy _ _ -
Received () Johnson _ _ _.
Referred () Kohinke _ _ _
To () Minnix _ _ -
Nickens _ _ _
~L.J -~
AT A REGULAR MEETRGINIA HELD ATRTHE ROANOKE COUNTY
ROANOKE COUNTY,
ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
WHEREAS, The Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors("Board")
of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract
a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $2,310,000
to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the
Bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA");
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to
the VPSA in order to sell the Bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1993 VPSA bond sale.
2 This resolution shall take effect immediately.
Attachment A
Exhibit 1
CAPTIAL COSTS - Alternative 6
Purchase Traveler's and Move Schools to RCOS
November 17, 1992
~-~
Fall '93
Revenue Bonds VPSA
Traveler's Buildinq
Cost of Building
Partitioning, Carpet and Painting
Telephone and Computer
ADA Work
Northside Construction
RCOS Renovations
Telephone and Computer Instalation
$2,400,000
210,000
200,000
10.000
2,820,000*
School Administration & Annex
RCAC
Total Capital Costs
Issuance Cost
Debt Service Reserve
Total Bonds
$1,910,000
250,000
150,000
2,310,000
750,000
150.000
900,000
3,720,000
100,000
500,000
$4,320,000
2,310,000
$2,310,000
* Based on this number, the cost per square foot for the Traveler's Building
is $45.36.
5
Attachment B
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
School Financing Bonds 1987 Resolution) 1993 Series C
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE FOR PARTICIPATING LOCALTI'IES
Date
Completed By
Acavlty
~ -~
Week of Aug 2 VPSA mails application packages, notifies localities of tentative schedule,
steps to be taken and deadlines to be met for localities to be included in
bond sale.
Aug 5- Sep 9 Local governing bodies and school boards pass resolutions authorizing
application to VPSA; secure bond counsel.
Sep 9 Localities return completed VPSA application form.
Sep 10 VPSA notifies localities of schedules and requirements; mails Bond Sale
Agreements and estimated principal repayment schedules to localities.
Week of Sep 20 VPSA Board meets and approves applications.
Week of Sep 27 County school boards should have passed resolutions requesting bond
issue (Appendix E to Bond Sale Agreement); localities should have
resolution/ordinance authorizing bond issue on agenda for governing body
(Appendix B to Bond Sale Agreement).
Local bond counsel submit copies of (a) school board and governing body
resolutions with dates of scheduled meetings for adoption and (b) form of
notice of public hearing and publication dates (affidavits of publication, if
available) to VPSA and Brown & Wood.
Week of Oct 4 Governing bodies .should have adopted resolution ordinance
authorizing bond issue.
Localities return executed Bond Sale Agreements (no later than October
8, 1993) with completed tax questionnaires (Appendix D to the Bond Sale
Agreement). Last opportunity for locality to change amount of requested
financing or back out of sale.
Localities file resolutions/ordinances with Circuit Court. Local bond
counsel provide draft closing documents to VPSA and Brown & Wood.
Oct 27 VPSA sells bonds and formally accepts Bond Sale Agreements.
f:\shared\debt\vpsa\issue\93c\schedule.93c August 5, 1993
~~
Oct 28- Nov 10 If necessary, local governing bodies pass bond sale resolutions/ordinances
to ratify interest rates on local bonds (the last opportunity to hold a public
hearing is before final authorization of the bonds).
Nov 10 Local bond attorneys submit final draft of closing documents (including
affidavits of publications for public hearing notice) to VPSA and Brown
& Wood.
Nov 15 - 16 Pre-closing -all executed documents available for review by VPSA staff
and Brown & Wood.
Nov 18 Closing on local and VPSA bonds -funds available.
NOTE: All dates are tentative and subject to change by the VPSA.
f:\shared\debt\vpsa\issue\93c\schedule.93c August 5, 1993
y ~~
RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC
SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF
SCHOOL BONDS TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have
determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue
general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed
$2,310,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public
school purpose ("Bonds") and to sell the Bonds to the Virginia
Public School Authority.("VPSA"):
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD:
1. The County School Board requests pursuant to Section
15.1-227.41 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, (the
"Code") that the Board of Supervisors of the County issue the Bonds
and submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the Bonds to
the VPSA at the Fall 1993 VPSA bond sale and the Superintendent of
Schools or such officer as he may designate is authorized to submit
such documentation as may be required by VPSA. The School Board
consents pursuant to Section 15.1-227.39B of the Code and Article
VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia to the issuance
and sale of the Bonds to the VPSA.
2. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
Adopted by the Roanoke County School Board on August 12,
1993.
Clerk, Roanoke County School Board
ACTION N0. A-82493-6
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Consideration of additional projects for FY 92-93
VDOT Revenue Sharing Program.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Z~~rtG~
BACKGROUND:
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually
provides localities the opportunity to receive state matching funds
for the construction, maintenance, and improvements to primary and
secondary roads in the state's highway system, pursuant to Section
33.1-75.1(D) of the Code of Virginia. The Commonwealth of Virginia
provides $10,000,000 for the matching program and limits
participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or less
than 20 Counties participate, our share of money will be
reduced/increased proportionately.
In FY 92-93, the amount of money requested by the Counties was
less than the $10,000,000; therefore, VDOT has determined that
thirteen Counties are eligible to apply for the unused allocations,
which total $1,400,000. Since Roanoke County matched the maximum
in FY 92-93, we have the opportunity to apply for an additional
$400,000 of these surplus funds.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff and representatives of VDOT have prepared a priority
list of appropriate projects from their project request files. The
proposed priority list (see attachment) represents $400,000 of
construction costs to be started in FY 93-94. Four of the
projects, priority #'s 5,6, 7 and 8 (Buckland Mill Road, Drake
Circle, Irondale Circle and Bradshaw Road) matching fund will come
from private donations at the request of the agency or homeowners.
Priority #1 (West Main St) will be matched from the Bond Fund for
Valley Tech Park with funds for priority #'s 2 and 3 (Colony Lane
and Sierra Drive) coming from other sources (see alternatives and
.D - y
impacts).
Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the
priority list in order that we may notify VDOT of our intentions to
participate in the supplemental Revenue Sharing Program by
September 3, 1993.
The funds have to be appropriated prior to June 30, 1994, or
Roanoke County will lose this opportunity for additional Revenue
Sharing Funds from Fiscal Year 1992-93.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
Alternative #1: Approve the project list and match
($115,000) from the General Fund Unappropriated
Balance.
Alternative #2: Approve the project list and match
priority numbers 2 and 3 from the Bond
Referendum and match priority #4 from the
General Fund Unappropriated Balance.
Alternative #3: Decline to apply for the supplemental
allocation for Revenue Sharing Funds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Alternative Number 1.
ctfully submitted,
mold Covey, ~i~-~t of
Engineering & Inspec ions
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Approved by,
Elmer ~Hodg
County Admin' trator
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Lee B. Eddy Motion No Yes Absent
to approve Alternative #2 Eddy - x
(Appropriating $25.000 and Johnson _ x
approving priority list withKohinke _ x
funding for #2 and 3 from Minnix _ x
Bond funds Nickens _ x
CC: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
pc: Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
`~-7
w~°-.
¢ ~ Z ~
~
~Z ~
~ Z
-. I
r -
m\o
Q W O U -I
G U
U
q ---I-
A q
q
I 30~
o ~ ~ ~T~ 1 W l~
7 I T~ ~T ~
I
^ I HW 3X
W S W~
UW y 3
W
y \
3
d V
UQ' I
~ Z F,
~ ¢o ~z
4
~~ X
~m fr X X
Er it W
N~
O OW
3 m ' I
~"" I N
~ Z Q~ N}
¢ N W W ¢I(1 I
~ N R^ ¢In ¢In
d~ d~ QJ
a U I
f ?~ I zti z I ~~ uj
_
mZ O
~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q
Z Z I-
~
~ r > r i i >
r > o ~
a
w
0 I I
I z I
~~'Z
° o\
~
°z I °z
z
°z I °z
z I °z
z a ~
I ~ o I
mZ
r- w
p a m
m m
S O W
U ~ N a I ti h a y
I
~ ti H H
~ C7 C7
~
N } -F t - -
'-F - -t t - Z Z -1
Q ~
~ m I ~ N N ~ I
_ ~ ^ I N I FW- N I
~
~W
~
~
~
~
~
~ Z Z
D ~
z
~
1~ W
Ll ~ z
00 3~O
p (`~vl
W_W aK~
n'
^~Z~I W~ O
Npvl~
Wm W~ t~ Z W W
pN N Onay
I Km
m Kn 2R W ¢
p~W OO~yWO
~~A I Kmg
I W
WJ~J
SO
0
Z ~ ~
W W ~ O li z
°h Ny ZH~W
oW°W "K O~ .Z..W ZW
~"~~ ~
~WCW ~"'W~J
.Z.~ F- rZ. h-07 y
F-F7 ~W-~W
i-OF-
~Z
~U
Z U7
~p l7 cU
f.. l7
~ ~ ~ U ~ior~I~ r-~ ~~H-~ ~~r°-~ ~~oU ..
.
.
~ ~°- ~~o.' WS~o
Z ~ CV W
~ p- ~ ~ ~ - -
O Q
O
~~W
Q ~
(~'1
I ~D N
N N
~ I
~
z ~ Q
z O -
~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ I-
(n ~ ~ Z d ~
J o ~
~ ~ o ~
~o ~ G c ~
~ C o
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1
J p a' } N H N N
I Z I N h
I
z
~
~ 7~\=
~ ~ 3 cn r r Y r r r
~
°O-tea
a ?
z~ z I
--Ih
z
I z~ z
h--
z~ Z~
?
--fl
zN
UZN
o °o
°o
°o c
° o I
o
o0
o I
¢ Lt=.v `D ~ N I N I ~ I ^ ~ I ^ I N
~
W Q F
o
U W ~ ~ ~
~ ~_ I I I
W J
¢'~M
~~
Z~
WOH
,,,
~
o mJ
ZOO N
\i-i ~Z~
^S
I
~`~
App
~~m
Q
I J
~-'o N.J.,
m
ojN N m
I I
N NU
UN .p
NWn N¢m
I
a
NON
~¢.Np I
¢
I I
I
OZ~
a
m .
NJW
oF-
~Ua,
3~ ~WW
myK _
NZW mZW
~
R
mYK _
~p ZW
N¢W
oGK
mKY NyW
oGQ,K O
~
p I . I
~
I I I
N ~'') V' N 10 1~ aD
7J-~f
'. I
.r I
W
Q
Z
~ Q
~ _
Z ~ }-
w
~- ~ z
O W
LLI I
0 ~ ~ w
Y
F- -J }- O
Q~L.~Z
C? w O
~ ~ ~
~ °^
WZ~~
a ~ Z v y I y I y
W I W I W
r
F r
r I I I I I I I
2 Z Z I Z I Z
- I -F- -F I- ~
~ I
-I
O
O .--f-
Ca ---
-
~ I ~ T
I I
I
I I ~
Zp
Q O ~ 1
J
~
~-
U
I y I y I
~ I X I X I X I W
OW
F-
Z >
¢~ f--
Z
~
~~ ~
• m
Er fr Er
y y Vl
I
I
I VJ
NF-
Q.
I
3~ ~~ I J~ I JN I a d Q~
¢.~O
~~
n.
a-~
d K,
U
?~ I ZN I z I 7~ I
I
I I N
~ ~ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ o
mz
a~w
c, w
>- w
r I w
r I ty..l
r I w I w I w
r r r I w I
r o o l
p z
aw
¢~
- I
H
o
~O} z I z I z ( z I z I z I z I z I ~ O
mZ
f- w
~
~ ~
I ~ ~
~ ~
m m
~ ¢ ~
~ p~
~ ~ ~
a I F.
rn F-
v~ f
I a r- F- r
cn ( v~ I rn
I f-
y c.9 C7
z z
-U -t t- - t' -1~ -h I~ -I ~ ~ t~ -I
2~ 00
~ m N
I I N I ~ I ~ I .-. I m I ~`'~ Fw-
O
~a
~
~
~
( ~ ~
T ~
I
I W
~ O
~ D
~
VFW-VFW"
l t`
o
I'I y
~~Wn ^
1~ m
~~QS~
( W Z
A
yN....N
I a
w ¢
yw
~ O~ I A~
yt\Q I y~Wn- yll7WO
I
I
I W
W '."
~-~
I
~. .*
~O oyNy ZH-~L''I
~ ZW?W WWoW WWKJ
~WJW
~W~
~ pl7 oU
la.Z~Z I L.
~~ I ~'~^~ I
~0~ Or I t
OI W
I
~
~
~ I WE~~
1L i.
F
tL
d
.~.
° d' W d I ~ ( (`~7 I ~ I N I N I N I ~ I I I
~ o v ~--
I ~ ~
~
z~~
o I
~
1 o i ~
I o o
N o I o I ~ ~
I o I
I
I
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFOi ULINTY ~M NISOTRATIONO NTERNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE C
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Joint Work Session with the School Board to discuss Capital
Planning.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~ . School Board requested
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At their meeting on ust 12, 1993, the
that a joint work session be held with the Board of Suphe iso n be fit wuthin their exustingcdebt
construction needs and the timing of these projects so that y
retirement schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would like to request that this joint work session be held on
September 14, 1993 at approximately 5:00 P.M.
Approve by,
Respectfully submitted,
. ~- ~ ,Ec
~~-r^'~- ~ Elmer C. Hod e
Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator
Director of Finance
VOTE
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved () Motion by: Eddy ._. - -
Denied () Johnson - -
Received () Kohinke - -
Referred () Minnix -
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. ~f
AT A REGIILAR M HELD AT THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY RADMINISTRATIONOCENTER
COUNTY, VIR ,
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and
First Reading for
Rezoning Ordinances
Consent Agenda
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
y~~~
BACKGROUND'
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption
of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The
adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive
content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies
the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the
required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances.
The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is
scheduled for September 28, 1993_.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
(1) An ordinance to rezone 0.85 acres from R-1 to C-2 and obtain
a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership,
located on the south side of Peters Creek Road west of the
North Park Office Complex, Hollins Magisterial District, upon
the petition of William L. Hite.
(2) An ordinance, authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand
Northside High School, located at 6758 Northside High School
Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the
School Board of Roanoke County.
(3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to erect a 152
foot self-supporting broadcasting tower, located on
Honeysuckle Road 1.75 miles from intersection of Honeysuckle
Road and Poor Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial
District, upon the petition of Appalachian Power Company.
~j''~
(4) An ordinance to amend the official zoning maps by the adoption
of revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps prepared by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency to be effective October 15, 1993
and to make minor amendments to Section 30-74, Floodplain
Overlay District, of the zoning ordinance to reflect the new
maps, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning
Commission.
MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE
CLERR~S OFFICE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
(1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these
rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second
reading and public hearing for September 28, 1993.
(2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved
and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items
1 through 4, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant
to this action.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ~~ . ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by Minnix
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred Kohinke
to Nickens
` /
PROPOSED REVISION TO THE
ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
SEC. 30-74 FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT
Sec. 30-74-4 Delineation of Areas
(A) The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to inundation by waters of the 100
year flood. The primary basis for the delineation of these areas shall be the Flood Insurance
Study for Roanoke County prepared by the .............~.:,,:,,,,;;::,.:;:. .................
dated ^ " ", ' °'°~~~~'''~~~~g These areas are more specifically define as
....::...:................
follows:
1. The Floodway is delineated for purposes of this Section using the criteria that a certain
area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the 100 year flood
without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any
point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table 2 of the above referenced
Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flo~~€I
i~:t~1e'~i~~'1`~I accompanying that study.
2. The Flood-Fringe shall be that area of the 100-year floodplain not included in the
Floodway. The basis for the outermost boundary of the Flood-Fringe shall be the 100
year flood elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above referenced Flood
Insurance Study and as shown on the F~~O
~i~~i'~i accompanying the study.
3. The Approximated Floodplain shall be that floodplain area for which no detailed flood
profiles or elevations are provided, but where the drainage area is greater than .1.00
acres. Such areas may be on the ~>Q~d1.~urB
Rte1a~. Where the specific 100-year flood elevation cannot be determined for this
area using other sources of data such the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Floodplain
Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the
applicant for the proposed use, development and/or activity shall determine this
elevation in accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic engineering techniques.
Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by professional engineers
or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods
used correctly reflect currently accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the
design flood shall be related to existing land use and potential development under
existing zoning. Studies, analyses, computations, etc., shall be submitted in sufficient
detail to allow a thorough review by the County Engineer.
Sec. 30-74-5 Creation of Overlay
(B) The boundaries of the floodplain areas are established as shown on the
~j~~tgi~~'1VI'~! which is declared to be part of this chapter and
which shall be kept on file in the office of the Administrator.
7/30/93
~ _ ~/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 82592-
12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF ROANOKE COUNTY, BY
AMENDING THE FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT AND BY
AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the following map and text amendments are being proposed
to implement the Flood Insurance Study prepared for Roanoke County by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency as an aid in administering the
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection
Act of 1973; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed base flood elevations proposed in the Flood
Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps were published in the
Roanoke Times and World News on December 11, 1992 and December 18,
1992 and were published in the Federal Register at 58 FR 8578, on
February 16, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, an integral part of the National Flood Insurance Program
is the establishment of local floodplain management programs which
regulate development in areas subject to flooding and are mandatory in
order to maintain the availability of flood insurance for property
owners in the County; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1
~''7
1. That Section 30-74, FO Floodplain Overlay District be amended
and readopted as follows:
PROPOSED REVISION TO THE
ROANORE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
SEC. 30-74 FO FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT
Sec. 30-74-4 Delineation of Areas
(A) The various floodplain areas shall include areas subject to
inundation by waters of the 100 year flood. The primary basis for
the delineation of these areas shall be the Flood Insurance Study
for Roanoke County prepared by the
~E
:~:,.;;.::.<:;.>;::.;:;;.:..:.;:..:~':~::»::.'; ::....: :......:......:::::>:::> ~ dated ~~e , „~?~~{::::.::#
~';. These areas are more specifically defined as follows:
1. The Floodway is delineated for purposes of this Section using
the criteria that a certain area within the floodplain must be
capable of carrying the waters of the 100 year flood without
increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than
one foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically
defined in Table 2 of the above referenced Flood Insurance
Study and shown on the
;::~ accompanying that study.
.. ........... y P
2. The Flood-Fringe shall be that area of the 100- ear flood lain
not included in the Floodway. The basis for the outermost
boundary of the Flood-Fringe shall be the 100 year flood
elevations contained in the flood profiles of the above
referenced Flood Insurance Study and as shown on the ~es~
.,,:
accompanying the study.
2
~~
FO District
3. The Approximated Floodplain shall be that floodplain area for
which no detailed flood profiles or elevations are provided,
but where the drainage area is greater than 100 acres. Such
areas may be on the ~"
'~:;""~~;~g~i1~[;`;. Where the specific 100-year flood
elevation cannot be determined for this area using other
sources of data such the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Floodplain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood
Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for the proposed
use, development and/or activity shall determine this
elevation in accordance with hydrologic and hydraulic
engineering techniques. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses
shall be undertaken only by professional engineers or others
of demonstrated qualifications, who shall .certify that the
technical methods used correctly reflect currently accepted
technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall
be related to existing land use and potential development
under existing zoning. Studies, analyses, computations, etc.,
shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough
review by the County Engineer.
Sec. 30-74-5 Creation of Overlay
(B) The boundaries of the floodplain areas are established as shown
on the «:::>:<:<:>;;:;;:>;: ;:::<:<.;:<:;:;;~::<:::<:::.:,:.:,.:.:.:.:::.:.:.::,:: ::.::....... ...
which is declared to be part of this chapter and which shall be
kept on file in the office of the Administrator.
3
~T
FO District
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and
the same hereby are, repealed.
agenda\code\floodplain
4
ROAp02CE COUNTY ~ '~
UTILITY DEPARTMBNT .
APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
TO
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Date 12 July 1993
Jones & Jones Associates phone 366-3335
Name of Applicant ~,,-~r;tP~t~
Address of Applicant 6120 Peters Creek Road,Roanoke, VA 24019
Name of Developer William L. Hite Phone 563-2976
Address of Developer 5607 Ambassador Drive, Roanoke, Virginia,24019
Jones & Jones Associates
Name of Design EngineerArchitects Phone~h6-333
Address of -Design Engineer 6120 Peters Creek Road Roanok .vA.24019
Richard L. Jones, Jr.
Nave of Contact Person
Name of Proposed Development Hite Project
Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific)
Automobile Dealershi used
There will be no ma~or en ine re air work erformed on
this site.
Location of proposed development (gURNISH_COPY OF MAP AND PLPNIME'I'RIC NL7MBER):
Peters Creek Road.
Acres
Size of proposed development in acres: ~ •85'
Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which
the individual water/sewer service Maximumions would ~et°MSLed:
Minimum feet MSL.
Is this application for a development that will be a part or
Yes
section of a larger future development? x No
if yes, provide map of entire area if available.
(OVER)
~..~~
Signature Appl cant
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
OF PLANNING AND ZONING
3738 Brambleton Ave. SW
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2068 FAX
(703) 772-2030
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed
THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
ws v
Application fee
/ :: , Proffers, if applicable
~ Adjoining property owners
l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and
aom~,,~acting withgqthe knowledge nd nsent f he owner.
~a~9naLure t ----- ---- - - _ -
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF
ws v ws .v -
~~ Consultation ~-" 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan
v Application :.. Metes and bounds description
L' Justification '~~ Water and sewer application
~_ Far staff use only
For StaN Use Only: Case Number ~ --
A IicantJones ~ Jones Associates, Architects PC (Hite Project)
pP
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and spe aifet s aPdrgeneral welfare.d Please answer the foldlowing
justification for the change in terms of public health, s y,
questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of districtclassU'~fc'ationen the zoning ordinancel.as the
purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning back into
will bring this parcel of property
The proposed rezoning Com rehensive Development Plan.
conformance with the Roanoke otuzone ofpresidential~in a commercial
The present R1 zoning is a sp
The purpose of C2 zoning would be furthered as this facility
strip.
would seek to provide retail and related seo~dinances•thisoportioneof
1992 revision of the Roanoke County Zoning .
the property was designated B2.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contameo in use ~~a~~~^~ --~~•••l
Comprehensive Plan.
rehensive Development Plan designates the area as
The Roanoke County Comp rescribed
"Core". This proposed development falls within the p
characteristics of the core land use.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, ana the ~u~~v~~~~~~~y
area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools,
parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. uate to support
All public services and facilities in this area are adeq ro ect to
the development of this project. It is the intent of the p j
ca ture sales from the existing traffic flow. The installation of
P the developer.
facilities connections will be by
2.14.2.14
'ROP~RTY O~
RUTH NINING~R
?ON~D R4
~O
±O
O
N~
o~
S
~\
~N
21.14.2.12
PROi~RTY O~
~}UNTER H. ~}G~RS SR
ZONED RI
o" '~
a~ o
~~ O
5~
EXISTING SANITARY
SPWER SYS"fPM
2~i.14.2.1 I
~X15TING ZONING RI
11a
O
O
0
~.
~~
N 2~1.14.2.a
PROt~RTY O~
` RO~NOiGE GOUNTY
~~ ` SGt~00L BOARD
~~'` ~ ZONI=D G2
N ~~o
~-
"O
O
-.~ 3.
~. ~
o
~~ ~
o ~
0
o ~
.,
O
\ ~~~
2.14.2.12.1
~'ROI~RTY O~
~}OBf~RT GOMfi'AN1~5 LTD
ZONI=D G2G
PROPOSED gUSIN~55
1D~NTIPIGATION SIGN
PRO}~OS~D STORM Y`IP~T~R
M~N~GNi~NT Ai~~
~X15TING WP~TI=R SUPPLY
5Y5T~M
EXISTING FIRE hIYDRANT -
GONG~f'TU~L
51'T~ PLAN
o~ ~' ~ ~N
N _ ~
\ s ~' ~.
S~.
d~~
o ~
~„
~O
~ ~~~ ~ ~
w ~k~
,~~ `{
r '' ~ '1~ ~ f ~ 1
A .t ° ':: k
- ., ~ -
,h
a ~~ ~ ~' ;;~~ ,LOW OFF ~ ~ e,ti- ,.;
~ 'a ~ r . 'i .„; ~ L ~ ~ SVc~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ qtr ~' <,
'i' .. ;~ .',. .~.~:~?' i*~ tt ,fit.'
. , .. ~ ~. F L t AA9-
~• t ~ r t*.- `•~, { ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - "~ SEE CITY
,~ '~ ,4.1f„r~.M ~T E R ~ N G
~+ .. . z
OAWOKE ,~ `C OSE ~ ~ S M j
i :* ~ ••
v- ~ - Pp ' ~ PRA ~ A •
~•
'~ ~; ~.
• //~ ,~ a
t" 5^HOOLr `y ~ - r• 1 pP9 ~~ ' '.~~u T F f t '~ r
METER "~ ~i
,rx 12" \ ,
EDUCER \\ •, ~ ~ '~
1 --.-~ \ ,
~ r ~ ,
~ ~ \~ "~
,..~ ~ -
' .rte- ~ .. - - ~/ ' \ ~ _ ,~ ~
~ r ~ \ r
~~----$U~2L.IN ~~:•D AC. SCH OL ( ~~ ? ~~ o •• ~
>: \ ' \
/" ` \~ \ \
!! w..
9 `,_,
_F6 "~ ~ ~
~ r-
~~ 1. a' * p ~
M~~ ~ _ .
~ %,
~,1, / s
_ J .~ ~ o
~~ ~~
94-~-16 ~ ~ ~ ._. __ ti~
~ Y ~ ~~~ 4-AJ t5 ~~ ~ ~ /
` 4-Ag-163. V ` -O _ ~ ~ __
~ ~ •..
_:
. ,~ a a--
\ ti ~ .
;`\\ °4A9-162 _ ~~ '~~, - - ~ ~
-- -.
o ~ ~.
~~ -s1
\ ' O
-. , _ ,\
..- ~;.~ .200' `..~d_ ~ ~P - .-- -A9 I
2~2 d= 3.4 ~ \~ .. 7' ~.. ~
4-A9~228 ~ i-. ' v / .
3 ''Q ' t ~ •~'- ~ S~-*~.o- ~ -A9 i3 MARKET
,9-22 _ 'Y ' 1 \ '~ 0=~'4' 4-A9=139_ ~~w~ SQUAF
aNDKE _! ~ . .. 4 • ~ ~, NOR -
iNDAI ~ .{ c ~ ~ ~ m
~ V ~ 'c1_ -
,~". ~ ~~ `
y •.,
4-A9-2
o= 4.0' ~ ~ _ 1.~
t .t .ct. - U
~ -•-- i \ / D=am ? ~ ` ~ ,~ ~
~ __ . __ Qo _ ,4 - ~ L
,~ - -.._ ~ ~ -~~ 4-A9-f35 1 2
9.188 ~ ~~- • 'cam '~- `~ _ ~ (~ ti-1 -~~~1
V~ R L ~ '~1 'J T ~.' iV S C H t/ COL ~ ,~~ r ~ ~ .\ ~ .. .l ~ ,i, O~
8 r r ~ ~ 1 ~
_~ ~ ! .,
l ~ 1. \ , -. ~ ° -' -~
- _ ~..
}- _ _ .
t . t ,l ~ 0 1
1,S ./.
1 _ _ _ _
_ ,
~4115~
r~LS~""
-~ ~ ~~ ~ .. . ivanl a i ...... .-
G -~
Q
- -NORTH - -- -- _---__-I
I 9 , 16
~ c •~
S1 6 ~
eau nolria q'^ / ~ rw~
~~ ~~ .~ .~ \ I •sa(rnr a wD ~ \ \ R e Ili ~ / / ~ ,~ \ ,
CWIICr \
SOa lc \ - S
\~ ~ ~ 7.lIK Q ~1 ~ -
~~' i
~O ~ $ 12 ~~-~~ ~
N /
w[wt •.~..~ ~ Ma ~t•ta( ~SpU~RE I
N.Inw, 4Mn ~ od dos tgRTN
.. _~ 2 ~ C2c =~ I
~ i + 1 ~ GteeK ,r
' ~Il ~~• / Pe~eeS 116t0K nN no. I Cz
V 1fb ~~~ UOi
~ .i 12.1 wr:
/ / rD~~~~K 3 w se /'~ ~ I i 3 <
1/../ /
~/^/\\ ~tll 112 I /.
/ \ \ ~ 10 K IG r•.a: 2.19 K 2
\ ~ 12 ~' I ~I. ~ `
~•d L]1 K ' ~ ~~
\ Y' ~ 1 {SY IDI ~ ~
1~lKK
, \
`KI ~
\ l ± _ ~ \
< /
N \ J /
s<..., ssuc
a IO.Ii K ^~ ~~ ~ 6 ~ R
!/jK`/. 1 ~a~
SI
•\n ~ ~ - Y
rr •7 O I
A V1
s
w~ ~ -
1~ Jj 2, V /~/ 8 O i
\ . p ~+ \ a
R
~/ ~ , '
B ~ p 1 q\
1 101c IDI \ C 'r'
I gist ICl \\/ 11~
P/0 2717-•-13
~`_.
_ "" DEPARTMENT OF PLANNII~TG PETITIONER: WILLIAM L. RITE
AND ZONING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 27.142-11
~~' REQUEST: SPECIAL USE PERMIT -- USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP
;~ ' REZONING -- R-1 TO C-2
v~(
i
Proposed Zoning: NO CHANGE R-2 For wart use on~y
Use Type:
Proposed Land Use: NO CHANGE - High School
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
YES x NO _ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x _ NO
IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO
Variance of Sections}
of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF
THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
ws v
ws v ws v
x 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan 1C Application fee
Consultation
-1/p s.<ss Proffers, if applicable
Application x <>:<ti Metes and bounds description
Justification x ~v~?> Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners
l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the properly or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and
am acting with the knowledge and consent of the o .
Owner's Signature:
._~r..__ ....~..
~ +... 1
For Staff Use Only: Case Number
Applicant School Board of Roanoke Count
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following
questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary..
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the
purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance.
This Project involves the much needed exfoot1additioneatfNo~thsideCHighy's
Public High Schools. The 21,280 squar
School further facilitates the need roomsdandaofficesoatspheeschoolill
provide ample area for various class attractive
This addition also facilitates the creation of a coarcelehas existed for
and harmonious community. The school use on this p the purpose of both
some time and the proposed expansion follows directly
the zoning ordinance and R-2 Zoning District.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County
Comprehensive Plan.
The planned expansion of Northside High Schooalsoraccomodatingcthe percent
the growth initiatives planned for the area,
of growth anticipated. .
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding
area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools,
parks/recreation, and fire/rescue.
The existing parcel that contains Northside High School and its
associated amenities are contained witeln 9220008squaresfeet with thesting
building area onsite covers approxima Y coverage will be
approximate 21,000 square foot addition, total building
at 2.6+ Acres. The building is situated in the northern porifoanyf the
property. This location is an SreaWater andlsewer facilities exist
impact on surrounding propertie
on site and access is on existing public roads.
ROAT~O~CE COIINTY
IITILITY DEP?~.RT='~-$NT
AFPLiCATION FOR WATER OR Sc~iaR SERVICE
TO
PROPOSED DE VELOP?•~.ENT
Date 7/20/93
Name of Applicant Roanoke County School Board phone 387-6400
526 College Avenue, Salem, VA 24153
Address cf P.pplicant -
Name of Develepe: same as applicant phone
Address of Developer
Balzer & Associates, Ig~one 772-9580
Name of Desicn E::c~neer
'*Ass o_` Desic~. Encineer 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, VA 24018
r.dQ_.-.
Names of Ccntac t ?erscn Jack Ellinwood
tia;k. of Proposed Development Northside Hi h School Addition
^..rce of Develoc^e.^.t and propcse^ nu:iwer o~ L';llts (Sa speci_ic)
21 000 S.F. school addition
,^-+ Y 7 Ay\~ DT~i\j! ~'~`T`RT(' \j [,~,fG =?
Location of proposed development (_JRNISri COP. OF ~?~ _
29.38 Acres
Size of proposed development in acres:
Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use Utionslwouldobe, locatedch
the individual •~rater/sewer service connec
Minimum 1225 feet MSL. Maximum 1230 feet MSL
Is this application for a development that Will be a part or
Yes
section of a larger future development? x No
~` yes, provide map of entire area if available.
(ov=R)
~1.
S-gnature or Applicant
~z
GUNN~E S 49 0 2 5 0
fl~vE c, ~¢~°g ~oo"C /4/.40' o"E 55.Co7'
11 ~ - --~) ~ -~
~ `74-~1~r2'oQ~~E S ~°310 "E ~ ~--- S~~
- -~ 2 ~2ro4.. I 0 ~~ "G
~ 208. ¢ ' t i 0 ~ ° ~ ~
~ N \ ~ ~ °~ ~~ 9)~ X93
~ ~ \ ~ N ~?
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i a
Q
3 / ~
_
EX/57" BU/LO/NG ~ , 1
\
f` O
~ _
-~
~ \
\
W i ~ - -- t
ti / "'
~ / \
cS
- -
~
/ 0
\ti\
\
6 ~
~ ~
~ b ~
+ ~
. ~ / ~ ,
.~
Ph?OP ~.DDt~i'OfJ
~ \Cp ~~
--
`
i
\ `
~~
_ _
~
f
3
EX IST/MG
PARK/~c/G
~ C-X r 5 7'. 5A ~ t!. 5 EW ER
i
i
i
i
REMA/NDS'R
NORTHS/DE H/GHScNOGt;
TM.37./0-/-20
~~ ~ o
tiCA , . - ~ R~K~ COUn/Ty SCHDOC B - - -
~6 ~ ` A PORT/ON OF Z~q.~g~R~RD N
\~ ~ TM..g7.lO-/-~ -
~~~ /B cb ~ Rr'y~eio~~
SITE TAgUI,ATION ~q,Vc~
.~~~
/ i2oo
- - --1995
24°r8'57 "W /0.08'
EZISTZNG S.F .: 94,000
_~
I
~'
PROPOSED S.F .: 21,000
PI,ANIMETRIC SHEETS BB7 & CC7 ~
TOTAL AREA: 20.976 ACRE ~ / ,
EXlST.4"/'/ATER~-/~/E ~ ~ 1
I
_
_
-~ Q
v
2 '-
7 ,
CONCEPT PLAN
FOR
NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL
ROANOliOr COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JOB NU1~ER 930360003
BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANORE, VIRGINIA 2401
I . '~
~,,Vw' q} CREEK -
4
~
~ ~ ~
~ A \
cKUn ~~a.. _ _.. c~-:>:
o~ ' ~, .
i„s~ c~rT THOR 6T
~
RI
~
J
NRTSfISI ~ ;
oyq,. ;q~~P~ et
~ GE R
4 NORTH
\ o o~ LAKES
/ 62 yr.irr ~~ /~
CMy~
DOE
~ H ~ F~s4 9
,a ESTATES °,o s ~
~ ~ s~7a
d~'
• s ,vunr
°R
s vrcEJ[7 OIfE ~ 777J~~
q, ~
~,~ Z
. ~
p t
`` ~ ^
GLEN COb t«~ +
~ ~,-,~~
iL [X COVE ~
o.
~
~R
~
117 9 '4~b O
~. Ngoo.
O
-'
EIEY.JGI.
•~.~~t
~ ~' I
4i. __ ._
~ VICINI -
TY .
6
MAP'° ~,~
~. RR
~ ~ 1~ _---
O .°~ ~ ~~ ,~
. .
D
NORTH
_ +~ DEPAR~N'T OF PLANNING PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
AND ZONING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 37.10-1-20
,d • REQUEST: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - EXPAND EXISTING SCHOOL
.,~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING
3738 Brambleton Ave. SW
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
(703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030
Fnr staff use only
date re)c ive ~ received y:
applicati n e~ Pdf
placa~ i~syed: BOS da z
c
b' (
/
Case umber: ~/~ ~
Check type of application filed (check all that apply):
[] REZONING L~'I SPECIAL USE (]VARIANCE
Applicant's name: Appalachian Power Company/P. J. Kehrer Phone: 985_2991
Address: P . 0. Box 2021 Zip Code: 24022
Roanoke, VA
Owner's name: Appalachian Power Company/Telecommunications Phone: 985-2833
Box 2021 P. M. Weaver
P
0 Zip Code: 24022
.
.
Address:
Roanoke, VA
Location of property: Honeysuckle Road Tax Map Number: 93.00-1-44
1 3/4 mile from intersection of
Honeysuckle Road and Poor Mountain Magisterial District: Windsor Hi 11 s
Road Community Planning Area:
Bent
Mountain
Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AG-3
7.25 acres Existing Land Use: Microwave and Radio Station Si te
sq.ft.
Proposed Zoning: AG-3 (same as present) ~.sratruseoniy
Proposed Land Use: Addition of Broadcasting Tower, self-supporting, Use Type:
152 feet
Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district?
YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO
IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST.
N/A
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO
Variance of Section(s) ~ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to:
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY ur
THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
ws v ws v
ws v
Y Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Y Application fee
Application X Metes and bounds description /A :~ Proffers, if applicable
Justification Water and sewer application Y Adjoining property owners
l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and
am acting with the knowledge and t of t own
Owner's Signature: °j-3
~~
For Staff Use Only: Case Number
?..: ~.
`•....•• Q~ ~ .. .
~r~ . ~ ~ ..~~~I ~~~~i~,•('~.~gist..iii.....,~~.~~ ...........................:...:.:.....:.....:.:.......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:.:.:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Applicant Appalachian Power Company/G 0 T&D Tel ecommun~~ationS -
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following
questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the
purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance.
This request will not change the present usage of the site, which is a radio and
microwave transmitter location. The broadcast tower to be constructed facilitates
radio communications for the 800 MHz system to replace our existing 37 MHz system.
This site will experience only infrequent visits after installation for the purpose
of routine maintenance and testing.
This site has, in the past, and will, in the future, fit well with the Agricultural/
Rural Preserve District purpose of the zoning regulation. It does not impact any
farming purpose, and requires no public improvements for its operation.
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County
',Comprehensive Plan.
This project conforms to the general guidelines and policies in the Comprehensive
Plan by maintaining the present nature of the area as generally forested; developed
for radio uses but uninhabited.
The installation of this broadcast tower has the incidental benefit that it raises
antenna heights, so that cutting of trees to clear radio paths is not necessary.
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding
area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools,
parks/recreation, and fire/rescue.
The property will have minor excavation for a poured concrete foundation.
This site will be similar to the adjacent and nearby broadcast tower sites, and
will be compatible with them.
Our installation will not interfere with the radio or microwave communications of
Roanoke County.
This installation will have a beneficial impact on public services and facilities
because it will improve Appalachian Power Company's ability to provide adequate
and reliable electric service.
There is no requirement for water or sewer connections.
0
0
of
a
a
3 '
F i
Z
~i
~ ~
3
~
~ p
$ ~ ~
i '
~ 3
x ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~ .5
r' 8V
~
°
~ 3 o~
1 30 S
fA ~
z r
n
y
~
~~A ~-i~
z
}~
^
~~p~p
oiF
F N 3
YC
z ir~~
~~ w S;o
4
v m
~ b ^:
~ °~
J
~. , P
A Z ;
' Z' S
Z
~
- ;
~~
~i'~-
Ry1
zzs
zy$'rz `sLm^ ~ 'L
zog=~q~ g ~-
~'~N' ~ o
m ~z.,_ ~
}~,i c
~~~ F
o
~- ,-
. }
'~ '-
~, '-~
.`
_ ,`
1 ~
THIS SECTION OF
FENCE TO BE
E
,M
v
w ++
1
i,~nnnrn ,~ r,r ..
NORTH Scale: 1"=20 ft.
'I ' Contours: 1 ft. per
1
line.
i - - ~'
r
~, I
-
" "~~ VI
CINITY M
AP
~ - ~~~~
~~' i~.~~
~'
~ -3
D
NORTH
_ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PI~ANIVII~TG PETITIONER APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
Z AND ZONING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 93.00-1-44
~_ • REQUEST: SPECIAL USE PERMIT -- BROADCASTING TOWER
~t,t
~+-i
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-7 AIITHORIZING LEASE EXTENSION IN
CONNECTION WITH OFFICE SPACE IN THE NEW COIINTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 52593-5, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County authorized the County Administrator to extend the
existing lease of 14,795 square feet of office space at the new
County Administration Center to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Virginia from June 1, 1993, through September 30, 1993, at
$13,870.31 per month rental to be paid into an escrow account with
HCMF Real Estate for improvements to the Traveler's Building, plus
payment of $3,548.65 per month to Peery Realty, Inc., for extension
of the County's lease of office space at Brambleton Corporate
Center through December 31, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, Blue Cross and Blue Shield has requested an
additional extension of said lease at a monthly rental of
$30,000.00, and;
WHEREAS, it would serve the public interest for the County to
further extend said lease agreement; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate,
including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first
reading of this ordinance was held on August 24, 1993, and the
requirement of a second reading was dispensed with by the
affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
further extend the existing lease of 14,795 square feet of office
space at the new County Administration Center to Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Virginia for one month, from October 1, 1993, to
October 31, 1993, at $30,000.00 per month rental to be paid into an
escrow account with HCMF Real Estate for improvements to the
building, plus payment of the monthly rental, currently $3,548.65
per month, to Peery Realty, Inc., for an additional one-month
extension of the County's lease of office space at Brambleton
Corporate Center.
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
extend the lease of office space for County departments at
Brambleton Corporate Center from Peery Realty, Inc., for a period
of one month, from January 1, 1994, to January 31, 1994, with the
monthly rental to be paid by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Virginia.
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
the lease extension agreements on behalf of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke and to execute such other
documents and take such further actions as are necessary to
accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be upon form
approved by the County Attorney.
4. That this ordinance shall be, and hereby is, effective
from the date of its adoption on August 24, 1993.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance and
waive the second reading, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
2
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
John D. Willey, Property Manager
3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. _~ ~~_
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LEASE EXTENSION IN CONNECTION
WITH OFFICE SPACE IN THE NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY'
This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to
authorize an additional extension of the lease of office space in
the new County Administration Center to Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of Virginia.
BACKGROUND'
By Ordinance No. 52593-5, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County authorized the County Administrator to extend the existing
lease of 14,795 square feet of office space at the new County
Administration Center to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia
from June 1, 1993, through September 30, 1993, at $13,870.31 per
month rental to be paid into an escrow account with HCMF Real
Estate for improvements to the Traveler's Building, plus payment of
$3,548.65 per month to Peery Realty, Inc., for extension of the
County's lease of office space at Brambleton Corporate Center
through December 31, 1993.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Blue Cross has requested an additional extension of the lease,
for a one-month period from October 1, 1993, through October 31,
1993, for a monthly rental payment of $30,000.00. Blue Cross has
also agreed to pay the rental of $3,548.65 per month for an
additional one-month extension of Roanoke County's Lease with Peery
Realty, Inc., at Brambleton Corporate Center, through January 31,
1994.
This proposed extension will require changes in the schedule
for moving the administration center to the new building; however,
the rental of $30,000.00 will provide significant additional funds
1-~ - /
for improvements and renovations to the new building prior to the
move. Payment of the rent to Peery by Blue Cross will prevent any
additional cost to the County.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The additional rental income of $30,000.00 from the proposed
extension would be held in escrow by HCMF Real Estate and used for
building renovations and improvements as authorized by the County
Administrator.
ALTERNATIVES:
(A) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County
Administrator to take such actions and execute such documents as
may be necessary to: (i) Extend the lease at the new County
Administration Center to Blue Cross in accordance with the proposed
terms set forth above; (ii) Extend the lease at Brambleton
Corporate Center from Peery Realty, Inc., through January 31, 1994,
with the rental to be paid by Blue Cross.
(B) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the
proposed ordinance to extend the subject leases. Staff further
recommends that, in order to expedite revision and execution of the
agreements and payment of the funds accordingly, the requirement of
a second reading of the proposed ordinance be waived by the
affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the board.
Res ectfully submitted,
is ie L. f an
Assistant County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Minnix
2
.V t 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE-BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LEASE EXTENSION IN CONNECTION WITH
OFFICE SPACE IN THE NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 52593-5, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County authorized the County Administrator to extend the
existing lease of 14,795 square feet of office space at the new
County Administration Center to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Virginia from June 1, 1993, through September 30, 1993, at
$13,870.31 per month rental to be paid into an escrow account with
HCMF Real Estate for improvements to the Traveler's Building, plus
payment of $3,548.65 per month to Peery Realty, Inc., for extension
of the County's lease of office space at Brambleton Corporate
Center through December 31, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, Blue Cross and Blue Shield has requested an
additional extension of said lease at a monthly rental of
$30,000.00, and;
WHEREAS, it would serve the public interest for the County to
further extend said lease agreement; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate,
including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first
reading of this ordinance was held on August 24, 1993, and the
requirement of a second reading was dispensed with by the
affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
~~~~
1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
further extend the existing lease of 14,795 square feet of office
space at the new County Administration Center to Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Virginia for one month, from October 1, 1993, to
October 31, 1993, at $30,000.00 per month rental to be paid into an
escrow account with HCMF Real Estate for improvements to the
building, plus payment of the monthly rental, currently $3,548.65
per month, to Peery Realty, Inc., for an additional one-month
extension of the County's lease of office space at Brambleton
Corporate Center.
2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
extend the lease of office space for County departments at
Brambleton Corporate Center from Peery Realty, Inc., for a period
of one month, from January 1, 1994, to January 31, 1994, with the
monthly rental to be paid by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Virginia.
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
the lease extension agreements on behalf of the ttoara o=
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke and to execute such other
documents and take such further actions as are necessary to
accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be upon form
approved by the County Attorney.
4. That this ordinance shall be, and hereby is, effective
from the date of its adoption on August 24, 1993.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-34.
DISPLAY OF DECAL GENERALLY, OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY
VEHICLE LICENSE OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE TO EXPAND THE REQUIREMENT FOR DISPLAY OF
COUNTY VEHICLE DECALS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY
These amendments will strengthen enforcement efforts for
county vehicle decals by broadening the authority of police of-
ficers to issue traffic summonses or parking tickets for viola-
tions.
BACKGROUND'
When law enforcement in Roanoke County was the providence of
the Sheriff's Office, Sec. 12-34 of the Roanoke County Code limited
violations to driving a motor vehicle without a valid decal. This
language is more restrictive than what the state code permits to be
defined as an offense. Additionally, there has been confusion under
state law as to how vigorous local law enforcement officers were
allowed to be in enforcing a local tax revenue procedure.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The proposed amendments to the Roanoke County motor vehicle
license ordinance broadens the prohibition in Sec. 12-34 (b) to
include failing to display a current county decal as well as
actually operating the vehicle without a decal. This is consistent
with the enabling legislation for local decal enforcement ordinan-
ces contained in § 46.2-752 G of the Code of Virginia. This section
was also amended by the 1993 session of the General Assembly to
specify that local law enforcement officers may use parking tickets
or uniform traffic summonses to enforce violations of the county's
decal ordinance in the case of a motor vehicle registered to a
county resident.
FISCAL IMPACTS'
y- .,~ ,
The Treasurer of Roanoke County estimates that on an annual
basis approximately 2,000 vehicles registered to residents of
Roanoke County have not paid their personal property tax assessment
and obtained a current county vehicle decal. Increased enforcement
efforts by police officers against unlicensed vehicles parked in
the county may produce substantial revenue for the county.
ALTERNATIVES'
I. Adopt the proposed amendments.
II. Decline to adopt the proposed amendments and continue to
rely upon current enforcement techniques to obtain
compliance with county vehicle decal requirements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative I.
bbenshain
Assistant County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Respectfully submitted,
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
N- .~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-
34. DISPLAY OF DECAL GENERALLY, OF ARTICLE II.
COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO EXPAND THE REQUIREMENT
FOR DISPLAY OF COUNTY VEHICLE DECALS
WHEREAS, a small minority of residents of Roanoke County and
some individuals and businesses who normally garage or park a motor
vehicle within the county continue to evade payment of personal
property taxes and purchase of county vehicle decals; and
WHEREAS, the current fiscal environment requires that every
effort be made to insure that all taxes rightfully owed to the
county are collected; and
WHEREAS, the 1993 session of the General Assembly has amended
the Code of Virginia to clarify that localities now have the
authority to issue parking tickets, citations or uniform traffic
summonses to residents of the locality where such vehicle is
registered to enforce local motor vehicle decal requirements; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
August 24, 1993; and the second reading for this ordinance was held
on September 14, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-34 of the Roanoke County Code entitled
"Display of decal generally" be amended and reenacted to read and
provide as follows:
/~~°~
Sec. 12-34. Display of decal generally.
a) A license decal issued under this article shall be
attached to and displayed on the windshield of the vehicle for
which issued in such manner as to be clearly visible.
b) It shall be unlawful for any person '.~<`~ ....:....::::.:...::::.:::....:::.::::::::..:::....
'ic#:G to operate a motor vehicle, trailer, or semi-trailer
required to be licensed under this article on any street, highway,
road, or other traveled way in the County, unless a current license
decal is displayed thereon as required by this section. The fact
that the current license tax has been paid on such vehicle shall
not bar prosecution for a violation of this section. A violation of
this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty
dollars ($20.00) and not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00).
Any violation of this section may not be discharged by payment of
such fine except upon presentation of satisfactory evidence that
the license herein required has been obtained.
c) Each day that a vehicle is operated without a current
license decal being displayed shall be considered a separate
1993.
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33.
REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS
SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, OF
CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, TO EXEMPT GROSS RECEIPTS LESS
THAN $3,000 FROM BUSINESS LICENSE TAX LIABILITY.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY'
The amendments to the county's business license ordinance
would exempt businesses in three license categories whose annual
gross receipts are less than $3,000.00. For these businesses, many
of which are part-time operations, the minimum license fee of
$30.00 does not cover the administrative cost to the Commissioner
of the Revenue's Office to process these licenses.
BACKGROUND'
Roanoke County's business license ordinance, Chapter 10 of
the Roanoke County Code, currently contains no exemption for filing
an annual return and purchasing a business license for very small
or part time businesses. Likewise, real estate agents or profes-
sions who maintain their state licensure in association with
another professional, but without being actively engaged in busi-
ness, must technically obtain an annual business license from
Roanoke County. The minimum license for personal and business
service, real estate service and professional service categories
is $30.00.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Commissioner of the Revenue has determined that for 1993
there were 157 individuals or businesses who reported less than
$3,000.00 in annual gross receipts but were required to obtain a
business license for a fee of $30.00. This represented revenue of
$4,710 to the county. If the threshold for purchasing a business
license in one of these three categories was raised to $4,000.00,
the number of licenses which would be exempted would be 194, with
a revenue loss of $5,820 to the county. It is the conclusion of
the Commissioner that this small loss in revenue will be more than
offset by the increased efficiency of his office and the perception
of responsiveness to citizen complaints which initiated this
change.
FISCAL IMPACTS'
Potential loss of approximately $5,000.00 per year in business
license tax revenue.
ALTERNATIVES'
1. Adopt the proposed ordinance exempting certain small
business from the county's business license ordinance.
2. Reject the proposed amendments and retain the current
requirement for all businesses to obtain an annual
business license from the county.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends alternative # 1.
Respectfully submitted,
J~~ph ~. Obenshain
S for ssistant County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
,~-/-,.~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION
10-33. REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36.
PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS. OF
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES,
TO EXEMPT GROSS RECEIPTS LESS THAN $3,000 FROM
BUSINESS LICENSE TAX LIABILITY.
WHEREAS, Section 10-36, "Personal and Business Service
Occupations" of the Roanoke County Business License Ordinance
imposes a business license tax of $0.34 per $100.00 of gross
receipts upon a wide variety of personal and business services
conducted within the County of Roanoke with a minimum license tax
of thirty dollars ($30.00); and
WHEREAS, the broad definition of "personal and business
service" defined by representative example in subsection (b) of
Sec. 10-36 includes many services conducted on a part-time basis
and by juveniles and retired individuals; and
WHEREAS, Section 10-34, "Professional services" of the License
Ordinance imposes a business license tax of $0.50 per $100.00 of
gross receipts upon every person providing professional services
within the County with a minimum license tax of thirty dollars
($30.00); and
WHEREAS, the definition of "professional services" defined in
subsection (b) of Sec. 10-34 may include retired or part-time
professionals or those individuals who maintain a valid state
professional license merely to prevent such license from lapsing;
and
~-/ :3
WHEREAS, Section 10-33, "Real estate services" of the License
Ordinance imposes a business license tax of $0.50 per $100.00 of
gross receipts upon every person providing real estate services,
including real estate agents, brokers, escrow agents and
appraisers, within the County with a minimum license tax of thirty
dollars ($30.00); and
WHEREAS, the definition of "real estate services defined in
subsection (c) of Sec. 10-33 may include retired or part-time real
estate agents or brokers or those individuals who maintain an
agent's license with a licensed real estate broker to prevent such
license from lapsing; and
WHEREAS, the administrative time and expense incurred by the
Commissioner of the Revenue's Office in processing the large number
of such persons for whom the minimum tax of $30.00 will apply is
not cost effective for the County of Roanoke; and
WHEREAS, no specific exemption exists in this ordinance to
permit the Commissioner to excuse the filing of a return and the
payment of a business license tax by those persons having gross
receipts of only a few thousand dollars each year; and
WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on August
24, 1993; and the second reading was held on September 14, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 10-33 Real Estate Services. , Section 10-
34. Professional Services. and Section 10-36 Personal and business
service occupations. of Article I. In General, of Chapter 10,
LICENSES, be amended and reenacted as follows:
~~ _.~
Sec. 10-33. Real Estate Services.
(a) Every person engaged in the business of providing a real
estate service shall pay for the privilege an annual license tax
of fifty cents ($0.50) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross
Sec. 10-34. Professional services.
(a) Every person engaged in the business of providing a
professional service shall pay for the privilege an annual license
tax of fifty cents ($0.50) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of
Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations.
(a) Every person engaged in the business of providing a
personal or business service shall pay for the privilege an annual
license tax of thirty-four cents ($0.34) per one hundred dollars
($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation during the
,~°
2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after
October 1, 1993.
c:\urp50\agenda\buslicn.ord
~= i
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-8 AMENDING AND REENACTING
ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
ROANORE COIINTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN
PROVISIONS CONCERNING AMATEIIR RADIO TOWERS IN
THE VARIOIIS ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE COIINTY
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted
a zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and,
WHEREAS, after the adoption of said ordinance, it was
determined that the Federal Communications Commission had issued
certain regulations pursuant to federal law which may constitute a
limited preemption of local regulation of amateur radio towers, and
which may conflict with certain provisions of the zoning ordinance;
and,
WHEREAS, these amendments allow amateur radio towers in all
districts, require a special use permit to exceed existing height
limitations or to locate in residential districts, establish use
and design standards, and modify standards for broadcasting towers;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its
public hearing on these amendments on June 1, 1993, and has
recommended approval of an ordinance adopting these amendments to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors considered these amendments
at its meeting on June 8, 1993, and referred this matter back to
the County's Planning staff to incorporate certain revisions to
these amendments based upon extensive citizen comments; and,
WHEREAS, the staff revised the proposed amendments based on
s
the comments received to allow towers up to a set height in all
districts by right, over which a special use permit would be
required, and reduce the required setback from adjoining
residences; and,
WHEREAS, the staff met with representatives of the amateur
radio operators on July 12, 1993 to discuss the proposed changes at
which time there was general consensus on the reasonableness of the
proposed zoning amendments, as modified; and,
WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience,
general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors
hereby amends certain provisions concerning amateur radio towers in
the various zoning districts of the County; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law, and that the first reading and public hearing of
this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and the second reading
was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted
August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as
follows:
1. That Section 30-29-7, Miscellaneous Use Types be amended
by the addition and modification of the use type descriptions for
amateur radio towers and broadcasting towers as follows:
2. That in all Agricultural, Residential, Commercial and
Industrial zoning districts, Amateur Radio Tower be added to the
list of uses allowed by right, up to the height limitation
specified in the Use and Design Standards, by amending the
following sections as indicated:
SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICIILTIIRAL~RIIRAL PRESERVE DISTRICT
Section 3 0 - 3 2 - 2 A)
( ~..~.~a.+>~~>~~~>>~~~>~e... , ::>:~~~a~#~:~"~?s>..»~se~
`
................
:`a#r
SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICIILTIIRAL/RIIRAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT
Sect ion 3 0 - 3 3 -2 (A) ~`+~~:;:;~ - - - -
SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICIILTIIRALIRESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Section - - A
30 34 2 ( )
.,,
SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT
Section 30-36 2 (A) ~~~'<>:~:>::::
~
.........::.. .
.......
.. ltd i:(`s`83``'~:e"
BEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Section 30-41-2 (A) ~~~<:.:;::
~.~
,.
SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIIIM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
:::.:::::::::::
Section 30-42-2 (A) +><~»»:<M:. ~~~a~~~~~~~....~Se. .
.~.+,..r ,.H ......~:.
.
...~~,
.
.
:: ~'
SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIIIM DENSITY MIILTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
Section 30 45 2 (A) .
,
.,,
:> ~<?
`:>`:~ . ~'?~:<?<~ ><':` 'did `~:~:::::::.
3
SEC 30-51 NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Section 3 0-51-2 ~~
~''~ D
(A) '~::;;::.~!~
..
...
SEC 30-53 C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,
Section 30-53-2 (A) 5. ?; ...:::::::::::::::: ::::::~:::~:•~:::::;~::: .::.::.
SEC 30-54 C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Section 30-54-2 (A) 6 ............................. ...... ....................... .:..:
SEC 30-61 I-1 INDIISTRIAL DISTRICT ... .... ._ _,
Section 30 61-2 (A) 6. ~t .::::::::::::••::::::;~:::~:: ::>~:::::::;::::.;:.:;;::.: :;.;:.>:
SEC 30-62 I-2 INDIISTRIAL DISTRICT
Section - -
30 62 2 tip'~~'t~'>?~8£'~~~'~%?~
(A) 6 .................................. >':~'`~f`~#:'
....................... 'a#r
......
3. That Section 30-87, Miscellaneous Uses be amended by the
addition of Use and Design standards for Amateur Radio Towers as
follows:
4
....................................::::::::::::::::::: •::: ••::: •::::: ':biiiii:":^i:: ••iiii}i}i"J"^iiiiy,.i.?::::iY:iQ:;i:;:yji{:;i:;i'r ::i'r:iwj{j•}:;iyr¢t,';:y:;,:;;<,>;... ;.; •....i}i'^::: ii:22%%'.~,~.i':ii'^:
:::.. .. ......... .ii4
Ti}:;i:;:i;:.~'{:: ::.}'^i'•i'Li;•:.}'ni}":.i ::..:::.: ..:...:. .ii~••:~i: ::::. S.~: i•J, v,.~y... ::::ii. ::I.~. ::'ri. :: .. :~Iy::::: :i. ::i .; .. '::'':::i: `:. :.yi~.lyi~;i :.;j,.. t•i}i ''.~~~i~:~
„i .. ,: .,: ,., ... .. .. i;4 f/7i~:~•:~i~.'~1^~:j:j:~iji.,1~,Y,.~,{,}~.~ ~,~,•,,,.:.:.G~t;~~l'~,.,.iii~X~iii: iiiiiii}iiiiiii:::i:::
•. '~... i7Y.~:s~~.I,l,~~~~„M~,,•.ii;.~,1,"'••'. ~:: ::viiiiiiiiiiiiiii:4iiiiiivi:::::::.isipiiiiiii^}ii}:v'v'^iiiiiiii^i:::::: :y:::::::: i:. ~:: :• ::::::::::::::..................................
iiiii};};•iii::4ii :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....................................
iYb'~., ~ {~..v i
....:.i.......::: :i:}yY.:. ~.: :: ~~.~ ' ~~ ~'.ii: ~.::. •::i}:'.v i.• •• .: j::'•".~`.{ij:~i'.~..::i...} •' ~~'::::i: ~ . ~.•. •.y.•i~..~.jj+rir~ii::i.:i:::}~::}: ii::ij•::j;:y', ~ i::::ii~i:; m:::{:Yi:•ii::...,yryF~::ii~ay~{~~1'?~$^..~~~~c
~ r •i••i
:.} :. ..: .. ~ i:.. MM~::IiI::: ~I~FMY ~~::j:.r1,T,.~,t;.: ~~ ::j~MMN~~~V~7Y.M'... •iiiiiiiiiiiiii}iiiiii}i:::i::i::i}j
>: ~..
•> ::.: .::. ... ..:.::.>~ ~~ »;:. :.. :.:a-'k;~r.~'A~;::iJFi~:.:::::.~.~~.,~„~.~.:>:.~.Jr.M;.7.7;a1;i4,.,,~/.,..,.~,~,:i~s:: ~;e::::: <:.
.~..~_.: ,t.i~.
:~'}~` '~:~i~:?
ay '~ ~~ •:~`•.~~:::?~~..:::~'~r',tit.~.«.'',~~,i,~~,,~.~.~~..,~,,.~wt~.r,:'' ~;.:;...'~w,.;41::::~.;;:.>:::.;:.;;;:;;:.;:~
;' :::.:>;;::.;:.::;.;:.; .; : ;;:: :. .. '::.: ~ .. •.. ::.: ,..::......;;:... .;:: ~~:!iF~iF:::::;kT::::~.~~iE:~w:A-T:ii>.:: .:A#;:~~ir::~i.i~;:i A{..,.~'.~..,'~.~.''.,
?iiii'}:i'Y:isi:::::::i:::i^:::ii:i%:':Y:ii'i:'~':i::isi%isitii:::i'iv::i::::::ti:::ii:::::i:::.•rii...:i':i'::::i::ii:::i•i:::i"~i::iiii::iii:::i'L,::: ~•ii:isi`:{:i::i:::::i'i:::Yii.:Y:i: ~'::iii::i:i': {:i:
{~y~!!~~'~~~i}~} ~~!µ{~y1~ i~ }~ {I~y ~'.jj~': `F:•,i::iZ~Y:•~~:lF~~~~~::}.iii::::Sl~~l1!~~~3Mv,S,ff~,~::::::•i~{~:i:::,~Y,f,
~M!~71I.~:IC~1.:~ V~X~~Yf.A~~.~~i~Y:~i~:~~::i::::~5{~}X .:...........::: :.:::::::: :w:::::::.~ n......::.. v.:: ::.:::::: ::v::::::: :v::::......:...:.::: }:::::: i::: i:: i •.
.. ...' ~~
iisiniiiiiiiiiiiiiY.::iiiiiiii::.iiiiiii"?{;.i::4i:: '.iiii^iiiiiiiiii}iii}iii:vi'i}iiiii::4iiiiiiii i}iiiiii}}; }i:i•iii'•: Tiii:•.i...i:!^iiii:~%i4i'"}{•iiiii:~j"[:'~::f.:+~::~:j:.}•~.
~:. ::i:ii:ii:::i::i::i::i .. .. vi ..:. i '. ..: is :::' '. .~~i..~'.: ~.~~j .....~.~{.14:. ... . ..~i.{.. .. .:::ii:: :.'!I!iiii~K:#ti~'iK11NNijj~ . .....................................
~. .:::::: :y:ny~y~~'~~~:Ih.~~~1!^::i~?1~~,~:.: al;._~ 'M^~ii:y ::::::::::::::::::: p'.iii}: iiiii?ii:¢:~.:::.~:::::::::::::: nii}iiiiiiiiiiiii:
:~:v:::::::: ::lit ~ ....................
viiiiiiii:4iii:::ii'.ii'F4iY+iiiiii}}yiiiiiii'r viii}i}iiiii}iii}}}iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:"4:+"J•: f'•i:iiiii ~:::i' ~':: 'tii:%iiiiiii':i:}}Y:Yii;i:;i:;:;:;iii::is::iiiii:i::i:::j:if}~:::;T:{,
. .... .. ..: .:. •i'y': :: ... :}:}:iii: :: •iiiiiii::. '• .. ..:~ ..{{ . . ..:: ~.. :::~F' ::::•,ii:::ii :.: .:: r:•:::::': ::: ~ .11.yy..~~: .. '~~ii .::::ii:::•::::M!':M... n..
~^- ~1}' ~ ::::::::•::i.~~
++yj~~ ,+e~ .~ .•: ''Wiiiiii::~~::iiii::i~K.4Y,.~:ti,1!~ .~N7iiiiiii:~~;^}Y.~i:~Ik,~~,.,~~„~I,liiii•~y}}:4iiiW :ii}iiY: :::4iif:
j1;F~~~Se-~,rrr• .v.,~;:•i+isJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:::::::.: ~:.~::4iiiiiiiiiibiiiiiiiiiiiii: i::: :•::::::::::?:: i::::: :•::::. ~::: :w: n........:: n .....:::.:....::
'.:.':....~.i.~..:.:isi'~...'ii.}.::.~~.~:::,.';:.i.. i','; .;: ":. ''ii;;i'i:{{~~':~:Ypi::i:Y3:$j~''ry'`{:i:~:XSI[ji}}•~";:iii..,,':iii./.:.i},y{isY~i:}:i:::i::'rijni;;{i~s::yf[:••iii:::i:::i:i:::i3i:.,., y':i.;:+'i•;:},
. .: .: ..: v; ... . : ..pii. .. vi:, <. { :.:: •:is::FF~f:i.~•K.~31!Mi:.:}v.~i}J :~{i;:!!1!;' ~::~:,TIT~,~:~ h:i.i~n:L:)S.TM:~'4ii:::.
~~,{e~...~:~.~.'.~,.~'`.r.~..~...:.;::,~~,•.~,<.i:..~M..:.::::.:::::.i:.ii:.::.>:<.i:<.iii:.i:.i:.>:.i:.i:.i:.;:.>:::::::~::>i:<;.::.ii:;;.:::.i;::.i::#:>:.::: •::.:::i:::::.::; ::::::::::::::::::.
:: •.:}+:, s~ •.:_?:ix:;~: ~`:'isiq'''i:ri'fi:':.:fi:'`•'i:'~.::Y2:'~ "' ~' i:`':~~'~::::i>c;:<::; ..:::;:::. ~ ::;:::::;::.:.:<;;::::;:;:.:::::.:.:;:;>;:;;:;:.:. i:.:::::;:::: •;::;:.;;::z>:.:q;:i::<: ••::
'~x:~.~'x::.:::. ..: ::.: ~,.,~,'.»:i:>:i~:»>:.i:.; :::.:::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::ii:.ii;;:.i::;.i:.::::::.::::::::::::.:::::::<.;;:iiiiii>:;:::.::::::::::::::..::
is>:i:::s::>::>::»>:: :.i:.i:.'~ii:.i i:.iiii;: ~::•:iii:.;:.ii:.i:.i :.:::::::::::::::::. ~:::::::::::::::::::::::. ~...........................................
•_: ~:;:>
' '~~ ...~
..................
................:.:: ••:.~ •::::: w::::::..::::r;•iiii}iii:4iii:;Ci}:•i:LL.i:.i:•iY `:; ':y~:i'Y:i::::::.:i:{::>.::}::i::i:: ''}::i:::'C. •.}:::•i::i~:::ii::.:•:::•i::}::ji..::: ~.:::: ~i::isi;i~~:•**i:}::':j•i:::j::i'i::isiC.:.•uy;i~~::;:~~;;t~~:~~:iyyy::,,'.}{•::'}{~^::~:}:v:
:IX::.}': ^': r, v+. ::: :i..:: ...i..; ~.. :iii: ~:' i:iv. ~:::i::: :.: •. ~. .. ~ : :i is :: i. ::. :.:.: :;i:;:; '. ~. .:iii: :: :;:i:S '• :.. .:~:::::111~::i:::: ' .iF:1~,M„„i1tiM+:;
.::: ~ ~.:.::; .. ... ~.;;:abbt~:>::>:;::;.~.~d~1;+t~:~:~.:~x?t.;:.is~::>:~i.,.;:.:!'~:~;;;:::i:.i;::.;:.i;:;:.i:.i:.i:::>:<~.i:::.>::>::.:::>ii.i:.>:.
±~: .:fit:,::>::»:<::;:;»»>::»»»::>::> »:<:::>:.>;;:;.>::.;>;:.::.:>;:;;.ii::i::.i :.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............................
4. That Section 30-87-2, Broadcasting Tower, be amended by
the addition of Use and Design Standards for Broadcasting Towers as
follows:
(A) General standards:
2. The minimum setback requirement from the base of the
tower to any residential
;..:..~:~:~'i~..:::::>:~~~:<::: .....~ __.. shall be
'~.::::~:::::::::: ~~~:::::~~ ::::::::......::......::::.;:::::::.i:.i:::::.::::::::.::::.~:::.
least equal to 40 percent of the height of the tower,
measured from the closest structural member of the tower
5. Towers shall be illuminated as required by the Federal
`;>~~
' on FCC >`'.i»>~`~`>~f~#':~:.::::::::::::::::.:
Communications Commissi ~ ) ~ ::......................................................................................
~~;.;::>:::;~:;:>~.>::;;:.:;.:::;~.;::::,;;:;::;i:.<:>::>:<:::::>~~::;~`,~>~' but no lighting shall be
incor orated if not required by ~~~ '~```~
P ....................... ..
other than essential security lighting.
6. Any tower proposed within two miles from any general or
7
prior to taking action on the special use permit
application. Comments shall also be 'ti?~:
immediately after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~.Ga~.-i
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
NOTE: ZONING ORDINANCE IS APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
cc: File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Jonathan Hartley, Assistant Director, Planning & Zoning
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Roy B. Willett, Judge
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McG. Strickland, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
8
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery
John H. Cease, Police Chief
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services
Director, Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Main Library
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
9
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
.Z "
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading on Proposed Amendments to the Roanoke
County Zoning Ordinance to Accommodate Amateur Radio Towers in All
Zoning Districts.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~GGsc-~
SUMMARY: On July 27 the oard held their public hearing on these
proposed amendments. Following the public hearing, the Board
approved the first reading with instructions to change the
effective date to immediately upon adoption rather than the thirty
days normally used for such ordinance amendments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
1) Approve Second Reading of the proposed amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance which now includes an effective date of
immediately upon adoption.
Respectfully submitted, Approved,
,~ -,-
2a ~, c~
nathan Hartley
ssistant Director of Planning
and Zoning
Action
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by
Elmer C. Hod e
County Administr or
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
..Z ~,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE
82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE
COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS
CONCERNING AMATEUR RADIO TOWERS IN THE VARIOUS
ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted
a zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and,
WHEREAS, after the adoption of said ordinance, it was
determined that the Federal Communications Commission had issued
certain regulations pursuant to federal law which may constitute a
limited preemption of local regulation of amateur radio towers, and
which may conflict with certain provisions of the zoning ordinance;
and,
WHEREAS, these amendments allow amateur radio towers in all
districts, require a special use permit to exceed existing height
limitations or to locate in residential districts, establish use
and design standards, and modify standards for broadcasting towers;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its
public hearing on these amendments on June 1, 1993, and has
recommended approval of an ordinance adopting these amendments to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors considered these amendments
at its meeting on June 8, 1993, and referred this matter back to
the County's Planning staff to incorporate certain revisions to
these amendments based upon extensive citizen comments; and,
WHEREAS, the staff revised the proposed amendments based on
~-l
the comments received to allow towers up to a set height in all
districts by right, over which a special use permit would be
required, and reduce the required- setback from adjoining
residences; and,
WHEREAS, the staff met with representatives of the amateur
radio operators on July 12, 1993 to discuss the proposed changes at
which time there was general consensus on the reasonableness of the
proposed zoning amendments, as modified; and,
WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience,
general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors
hereby amends certain provisions concerning amateur radio towers in
the various zoning districts of the County; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as
required by law, and that the first reading and public hearing of
this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and the second reading
was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted
August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as
follows:
1. That Section 30-29-7, Miscellaneous Use Tynes be amended
by the addition and modification of the use type descriptions for
amateur radio towers and broadcasting towers as follows:
****
r- ~
2. That in all Agricultural, Residential, Commercial and
Industrial zoning districts, Amateur Radio Tower be added to the
list of uses allowed by right, up to the height limitation
specified in the Use and Design Standards, by amending the
following sections as indicated:
SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL~RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT
Section 30-32-2 A ~+~;~'~ '~ ~trieous ~Use~
SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL~RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT
Section 30-33-2 A ~<>><[::~..~~~~~~~'o~.~' USE!
<:;>;<~;
SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
- 3 4 - 2 A ~ t>' <`<> M;~::;:::;.:>.:;::: ~ :»> ~~x& i i~~G'' S
Section 3 0 ~ ) :......:::::»;>:aR;~'~'.::::~-~.~:.:. .::::::::..:::::::....:.;;;:;.;:.;..;.
SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT
Section 30-36-2 A ~?€€~>':`«'~~'~~~~e'~ ~`~xie~1.,~ Us~~
.;:.?~~t .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.......:::::::::::::::::::.
SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Section 30-41-2 A >~«~>~'~~~'e~'~>~x1le~af~~» >Use~
:[~i
~.;:~~>~ a .............::::::::.:::,::.....:.::....
SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Section 30-42-2 A >~<<iii'~:~;ce:'s.;:~t.;a~~;c~~;:~~...........
~~~teurR`~~~~ ;~w~:r.:::.;:.;:.
SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
Section 30-45-2 A `~~<><><>[~~sce~:>1aMec~u~::>:::
3
~' /
SEC 30-51 NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Section 30-51-2 (A) ,~~>~:~<s:~~..e.~.~. ane~t~s Uee~
......
SEC 30-53 C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT
Section 30 ( ) ...............................................................:...:...........
SEC 30-54 C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Section 30 54 2 (A)
SEC 30-61 I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT .._
Section 30 61 ( ) ............................................................:...............
SEC 30-62 I-2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
>R ><~r;'
Section 30-62-2 (A) 6. ~`~:::: : > ::::::.
3. That Section 30-87, Miscellaneous Uses be amended by the
addition of Use and Design standards for Amateur Radio Towers as
follows:
_ < :<::<:mow
;~:r`
>> ''ad
~~...
4
....z -/
:;:.<:
........:::::: .:.......... ~.n::::::an.~......~c~w~x::::: ~~...................:..:::::::::.I~:.:::::::::::::::::::::::;.;:.;:.i:;.:;.;P:.i:.i:;.;:;::::;>ii:.;:.is.;:.;;;:>::;::>::>::>:<:>::>::>
a~~::»~.:::~:~~me~»:~ ~:»b;~ a >~!~:.;;:~>
;::.::.;;>:.::::::.. , ....; .;::::. :.;:.;b~:.::.::a:.~::~:~im~:~ta~~~:;.i:.~.~:.;:.;~'~:q.aft::.;;1~"::::::::.;:.;;:.;:.;;;;;;;;:.;:.>;;:.;:.;:.;.~;:::::::.
::i':i:%::\.':isi'{is~~::i}isi::::i'::i::i::::i:;y:.i,.'?:~•( ~+
azu~.~,:~~ .......:........:::............................. t ~ ~::::::....:......:: ..........................................
.......................................... v.::::::::::::. _:::::. ~::: :wx:: v:: viiiiiiii:C•iiiiiiiY.•+i:.i:.iiiiiii;:'.i:::i:'.i;::i::i::i::L:{?Xj::iji!i!..!; ~?::i:i:'i:i::'<;:?;L% :i::: :i
~.F::::::::::::A
>~:~~m~ ~~ ~::::> a s;a~>:a.~h .........:..::::::::::::::::::::::::..::......P::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...:....:::::. ~::::.:::;::::.::: ~ :::;:::.::::.
eft
..:...::.. can:;.;~;0::::'~:~:::a~d.::;~hei::~m~~. ~neY.:::~ :.:::::::::::::::::..>:.:~;;;:.»:.::.;:.;;;;;:.:::::.:::~::::::::::.::.;::.;:.;:.;:.;;
Al:~::'T~i..:;~r:J::;St~::::7iJ:A:::yh7:.Qf..~Ji1::Q~:`.'!r.:.7.*..~ ~4:
::.>.:...::.>:.:::.::.::.....»:.::::.::.>::. :..>:.:.> ::.;: , . d.a::F~~~.~.:~~.s.:::~h~.;:.;~~~s:~~,.raw.~..r~~`::.:~r~~,~.t~i,.>:::.::::::.::.;:.:
::::.:::.~::::...::: :~:.:.i:.~,. ~~~~,~.~u:~~.~.::. bona.n.g.;:.i :.:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::>i;:.;;:.;;:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.i:.;:.i:;.:i;:.::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.....
::::x..:., ..::.:::::::: ::::.:::..:::::.;::..;::;:.;~::.. ~.;~:~ ~:::::..:.. ~.
:.: .:::::::::::::(~'.Lh~:.;:.;:Gila.~~..~tt~,a,Ott:::::~:~:ji;:{`'`'~(~~:::>::>:::e~:1Tt:~.:::::::::::::::::::::::.~.:::.:;:.;;;;: ~::::::::::::::.::::::::.::::.;;;;.:;::::::;::::::::::::::::::::.::::
Y:iir::i::S::ii}`~J.~.i:?i:.»>:.>i;iii::::::2:i'ri>i::i::::ii::i::i v:iiii:.>:.>:.>;?:;.i v.:':>i?:i:.>:.>:.>~':>ssi:::: ::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:.
:~::. . ~:~:Zi%.w~
txz~c"~<~>>: ~> <><<~~~::<:~hpeen::.::::::.i;;:.i:::.:.;:::;;.;.::;;::;
:.;::.:.;:.: ;:.~:nd.:;~:n~u~t~.~a.:.is~.~.n.~.~:.;;;c~~~:.~;:.:::::::
:.;i:.;~:.;:.;;;:.;:.;;;:.;:.;:.i:.i:.;:.;:.;i :.:::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::............................................
>::>:::: ~ 4.
~~~ar:::>:::<:>:rah::a::a>:::>::::>:~~?,~~s ::...........::::::::::::.~.:::::::::::............:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............:::::::::::::::::::::::.
e~::»:>>a~ :::::::::::::::::::::::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.ii>:.::::::::::::::::::::.::.;:.;:.ii:.iii::.;:.;:<.::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..........................................
~~i~i~::::.~e~:: fit::»::> ;~~. ..:.............::::::::::::::::::::.~...........::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............:::::::::;::::::.
:::: ~::v:::
>:::b.~
1'~.
:t.~..
.. :. .:.::::::::... <.:: .::: ~::a:~..:::~s~.:::.~:ran.~.~:.>:<~.~.:::~~.:::::::::::::::::::::.~:.;:.;:.;:;.;.::::::::::::::::.:::::::::;:.;:.>;:::.::.;::::::.::::::::::.:::::::.
:;::;<::: ~~-e
`'
~~ ~«~..
><>...~
.::::. ;::::>::::>:sa~t ::::>::>~~ .......................................
.i:. f:.i:::Y:i::i::i'iii;:i::ii:::i:?: ;:i:::'i; ::i::+:' :: :<; ;: ::?. ~:! .;:: •y:?;?i?;' ~ `.~ :::i::i<...; ;!:: :Si:;i {Cj::iiY):i:::i: ,X;.:'?:F:::i::i:::ti::j:))::i'i:}: tij~(:::i:y :i::i:
~~~s.:~..d.~~~.~~~~°<~uu~t;::<~,as:Qna~~..~.:: a~~gzt~~ad~::>:<<<~~t~~`
cst~~ ~'
-~
. ~'_'
:: '::
4. That Section 30-87-2, Broadcasting Tower, be amended by
the addition of Use and Design Standards for Broadcasting Towers as
follows:
(A) General standards:
2. The minimum setback requirement from the base of the
7
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be,
and the same hereby are, repealed.
c:\wp51 \agenda\zoning\amateur.ord
8
I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: 7"~~l/L C%~---5
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII~L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR 1'HE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will 6e given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained 6y the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME f ~i4V(D ~ ~O.Uc-3
ADDRESS SZO `7 ,~rtrvT Qua~22
PHONE D.9N ~3 S ~7 - 31 Sg
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
--~- _ ~
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH8 ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-9 FOR'AIITHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE
NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRIICT
TH8 SOIITH TRANSMISSION LINE AND THE STARREY
ROAD WATER PROJECT
WHEREAS, location plans for the South Transmission Line
Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project have been completed
and the projects will require acquisition of easements across
certain properties; and,
WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any
future construction of the water line project; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and
the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary
easements for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey
Road Water Project are hereby authorized across the following
properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following
property owners, their successors or assigns:
Tax Map No. Property Owner Acc,~uisition
97.05-01-01 Harris, Ola Agee Easement
97.01-02-12 Lemon, Curtis & Dorothy and
Lemon, Charles & Anne Easement
97.01-02-11 Bogese, Catherine L. Easement
97.01-02-10 Lemon, Charles & Curtis Easement
96.02-01-43 McCormick, Nina H. Easement
86.03-04-05 Arthur, Jeffrey D. & Bernice Easement
86.03-02-01 Reed, Lewis H. & Alene Easement
86.03-01-43 Hofer, Charles & Zurna Easement
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER AO UISITION
86.01-01-49.1 Minter, Wayne E. & Glenna S. Easement
86.01-01-49.2 Spitzer, Arnold R. & Donna Easement
86.01-01-45 Brundedge, Jasper & Sharon Easement
76.03-04-51 Harman, Richard P. & Margaret Easement
76.03-04-33 Jones, Thomas Michael & Mabel Easement
76.03-03-78 Turner, Charles B. & Connie Easement
76.03-03-75 Kettleson, J. Benton & Wanda Easement
74.00-02-23 Obenchain, Learleen Easement
74.00-02-22.3 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
74.00-02-22.1 Palmer, Tony & Donna Easement
74.00-02-16 Huffman, Steven & Sandra Easement
74.00-02-06 Neely, Billy & Clydis Easement
74.00-01-40 Laplace, Roger & Suzanne Easement
74.00-01-38 Brown, William E. & Darlene K. Easement
74.00-01-36 Pavich, Jessie D. & Billie H. Easement
74.00-01-34 Aliff, Clarence, Jr., & Brenda M. Easement
74.00-01-34.1 Buck, James Easement
74.00-01-33 Austin, Samuel & Virginia Easement
74.00-01-32 Kanode, Ronald G. & Debbie W. Easement
74.00-01-31 Kanode, Roman R. & Polly S. Easement
74.00-01-25 Bryant, Allen R., Jr., & Jane Easement
74.00-01-24 Toler, Wayne M. Easement
74.00-01-21 Wimmer, Lillian Ora, Heirs Easement
74.00-01-12.2 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-12 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-08.2 Wimmer, Woodrow M. & Sharon G. Easement
73.00-02-38.2 Cooper, Jerry N. & Mary G. Easement
73.00-02-37 Foster, R. N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-32 Foster, Robert N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-11 Reynolds, Keith & Margaret Easement
73.00-02-10 Reynolds, Margaret T. Easement
73.00-01-71 Page, Terry J. (c/o James Page) Easement
73.00-01-68.2 Kristensen, Kim & Susanne Easement
73.00-01-68.1 Wood, Wayne & Vicki Easement
73.00-01-68 Fisher, Curtis & Janice Easement
73.00-01-67 Joiner, Murray E. & Patricia B. Easement
73.00-01-59 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-58 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-56 Fisher, Jessie & Myrtle Easement
73.00-01-8.12 Blankenship, Herbert E. &
Coleman, Dan C. Easement
73.00-01-05 Appalachian Power Company Easement
73.00-01-04 Appalachian Power Company Easement
66.04-01-13 Renick, C. John & James Easement
66.04-01-12.2 McAden James W. Easement
66.02-01-03 Mitchell, Evelyn Marie Easement
66.01-03-19 Moran, R. L., Jr. & Martha S. Easement
66.01-03-15 Watts, George Easement
66.01-03-09 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
66.01-03-08 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
2
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER AC UISITION
66.01-03-06 Lucado, James R. & Mary L. Easement
66.01-01-19 Akers, Gordon L. & Sandra Easement
66.01-O1-17 Hale, David L. Easement
66.01-01-16 Holdren, Alan Richard Easement
66.01-01-15.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-15 Sisk, William A. & Bettle E. Easement
66.01-01-14.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-09 Clingenpeel, Ronald L. & Betty Easement
66.01-01-20 Wood, Robert E., Jr. Easement
66.01-01-13 Mills, Lewis Harvey & Mary W. Easement
66.01-01-05 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-01-03 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-01-02 Haymaker, Charlotte K. Easement
66.01-01-01 Salem, City of Easement
66.00-01-12.4 Moulse, Helen H. Easement
65.00-03-10.7 Noell, Brent L. Easement
65.00-03-10.6 Noell, Keith E. & Cathy Easement
65.00-03-10.2 Webb, Frank Wayne Easement
65.00-03-10.1 Noell, Brent L. & Susan C. Easement
65.00-03-03 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-03-02 Hedge, Willie D. & Laura K. Easement
65.00-03-01 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-02-37 Beason, F. M. & Audrey O. Easement
65.00-02-35 Lucas, Dennis L. & Leketa C. Easement
65.00-01-43 Hudson, Grace Lee Hale Easement
65.00-01-42 Boone, Charles W. Easement
65.00-01-09 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
65.00-01-08 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-05 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-04.1 Helton, Christopher W. Easement
65.00-01-04 Barnett, Robert E. Easement
65.00-01-03 Thurman, Ellen Marie Easement
65.00-01-02 Thomas, David & Martha Easement
65.00-01-01 Mauney, Harry C. & Mary D. Easement
2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition
shall not exceed a value equal to 40~ of the current tax assessment
for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if
any; and
3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid
from the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water
Line Project funds; and,
3
4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to
accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved
by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
4
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER "'_" '~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance - Authorization to
Acquire Necessary Easements to Construct the South
Transmission Line
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The Board of Supervisors has approved the South Transmission Line
and Starkey Water Line Projects along with the appropriate funding.
The above projects will involve acquisition of approximately 150
easements. In order to secure the required properties in a timely
manner, staff will bring a partial list of affected properties for
approval by the Board instead of waiting until all properties have
been identified.
An Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the second group of
easements is attached.
The following is a list of properties involved:
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACQUISITION
97.05-01-01 Harris, Ola Agee Easement
97.01-02-12 Lemon, Curtis & Dorothy and
Lemon, Charles & Anne Easement
97.01-02-11 Bogese, Catherine L. Easement
97.01-02-10 Lemon, Charles & Curtis Easement
96.02-01-43 McCormick, Nina H. Easement
86.03-04-05 Arthur, Jeffrey D. & Bernice Easement
86.03-02-O1 Reed, Lewis H. & Alene Easement
86.03-01-43 Hofer, Charles & Zurna Easement
86.01-01-49.1 Minter, Wayne E. & Glenna S. Easement
86.01-01-49.2 Spitzer, Arnold R. & Donna Easement
86.01-01-45 Brundedge, Jasper & Sharon Easement
76.03-04-51 Harman, Richard P. & Margaret Easement
76.03-04-33 Jones, Thomas Michael & Mabel Easement
76.03-03-78 Turner, Charles B. & Connie Easement
76.03-03-75 Kettleson, J. Benton & Wanda Easement
74.00-02-23 Obenchain, Learleen Easement
~~
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER A UISITION
74.00-02-22.3 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
74.00-02-22.1 Palmer, Tony & Donna Easement
74.00-02-16 Huffman, Steven & Sandra Easement
74.00-02-06 Neely, Billy & Clydis Easement
74.00-01-40 Laplace, Roger & Suzanne Easement
74.00-01-38 Brown,- William E. & Darlene K. Easement
74.00-O1-36 Pavich, Jessie D. & Billie H. Easement
74.00-01-34 Aliff, Clarence, Jr., & Brenda M. Easement
74.00-01-34.1 Buck, James Easement
74.00-01-33 Austin, Samuel & Virginia Easement
74.00-01-32 Kanode, Ronald G. & Debbie W. Easement
74.00-01-31 Kanode, Roman R. & Polly S. Easement
74.00-01-25 Bryant, Allen R., Jr., & Jane Easement
74.00-01-24 Toler, Wayne M. Easement
74.00-01-21 Wimmer, Lillian Ora, Heirs Easement
74.00-01-12.2 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-12 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-08.2 Wimmer, Woodrow M. & Sharon G. Easement
73.00-02-38.2 Cooper, Jerry N. & Mary G. Easement
73.00-02-37 Foster, R. N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-32 Foster, Robert N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-11 Reynolds, Keith & Margaret Easement
73.00-02-10 Reynolds, Margaret T. Easement
73.00-01-71 Page, Terry J. (c/o James Page) Easement
73.00-01-68.2 Kristensen, Kim & Susanne Easement
73.00-01-68.1 Wood, Wayne & Vicki Easement
73.00-01-68 Fisher, Curtis & Janice Easement
73.00-01-67 Joiner, Murray E. & Patricia B. Easement
73.00-01-59 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-58 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-56 Fisher, Jessie & Myrtle Easement
73.00-01-8.12 Blankenship, Herbert E. &
Coleman, Dan C. Easement
73.00-01-05 Appalachian Power Company Easement
73.00-01-04 Appalachian Power Company Easement
66.04-01-13 Renick, C. John & James Easement
66.04-01-12.2 McAden James W. Easement
66.02-01-03 Mitchell, Evelyn Marie Easement
66.01-03-19 Moran, R. L., Jr. & Martha S. Easement
66.01-03-15 Watts, George Easement
66.01-03-09 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
66.01-03-08 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
66.01-03-06 Lucado, James R. & Mary L. Easement
66.01-01-19 Akers, Gordon L. & Sandra Easement
66.01-01-17 Hale, David L. Easement
66.01-01-16 Holdren, Alan Richard Easement
66.01-01-15.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-15 Sisk, William A. & Bettle E. Easement
66.01-01-14.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-09 Clingenpeel, Ronald L. & Betty Easement
66.01-01-20 Wood, Robert E., Jr. Easement
66.01-01-13 Mills, Lewis Harvey & Mary W. Easement
-~
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER A UISITION
66.01-01-05 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-01-03 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-O1-02 Haymaker, Charlotte K. Easement
66.01-01-01 Salem, City of Easement
66.00-01-12.4 Moulse, Helen H. Easement
65.00-03-10.7 Noell, Brent L. Easement
65.00-03-10.6 Noell, Keith E. & Cathy Easement
65.00-03-10.2 Webb, Frank Wayne Easement
65.00-03-10.1 Noell, Brent L. & Susan C. Easement
65.00-03-03 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-03-02 Hedge, Willie D. & Laura K. Easement
65.00-03-O1 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-02-37 Beason, F. M. & Audrey O. Easement
65.00-02-35 Lucas, Dennis L. & Leketa C. Easement
65.00-O1-43 Hudson, Grace Lee Hale Easement
65.00-01-42 Boone, Charles W. Easement
65.00-01-09 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
65.00-01-08 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-05 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-04.1 Helton, Christopher W. Easement
65.00-O1-04 Barnett, Robert E. Easement
65.00-01-03 Thurman, Ellen Marie Easement
65.00-01-02 Thomas, David & Martha Easement
65.00-01-01 Mauney, Harry C. & Mary D. Easement
Staff would recommend that the payment for acquisition of easements
be in an amount negotiated with the property owner not to exceed
40% of assessed value of the land plus any actual damage to
improvements as established by County assessment records or an
appraisal made by an independent appraiser retained by the County.
The first reading of the Ordinance was held on July 27, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT'
The cost of easement acquisition is included as part of the overall
project budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the first
reading of an Ordinance authorizing acquisition of easements at a
cost not to exceed 40% of the assessed value plus cost of actual
damage to improvements as established by County assessment records
or an appraiser retained by the County as needed for the South
Transmission Line.
SUBMITTED BY:
Clifford g, P.E.
Utility Direc or
APPROVED:
C' C~aCf
Elmer C. Ho e
County Adminis ator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE
NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT
THE SOUTH TRANSMISSION LINE AND THE STARKEY
ROAD WATER PROJECT
WHEREAS, location plans for the South Transmission Line
Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project have been completed
and the projects will require acquisition of easements across
certain properties; and,
WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any
future construction of the water line project; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and
the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary
easements for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey
Road Water Project are hereby authorized across the following
properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following
property owners, their successors or assigns:
Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition
97.05-01-01 Harris, Ola Agee Easement
97.01-02-12 Lemon, Curtis & Dorothy and
Lemon, Charles & Anne Easement
97.01-02-11 Bogese, Catherine L. Easement
97.01-02-10 Lemon, Charles & Curtis Easement
96.02-01-43 McCormick, Nina H. Easement
86.03-04-05 Arthur, Jeffrey D. & Bernice Easement
86.03-02-01 Reed, Lewis H. & Alene Easement
86.03-01-43 Hofer, Charles & Zurna Easement
~~
TAX MAP NO PROPERTY OWNER AC UISITION
.
86.01-01-49.1 Minter, Wayne E. & Glenna S. Easement
86.01-01-49.2 Spitzer, Arnold R. & Donna Easement
86.01-01-45 Brundedge, Jasper & Sharon Easement
76.03-04-51 Harman, Richard P. & Margaret Easement
76.03-04-33 Jones, Thomas Michael & Mabel Easement
76.03-03-78 Turner, Charles B. & Connie Easement
76.03-03-75 Kettleson, J. Benton & Wanda Easement
74.00-02-23 Obenchain, Learleen Easement
74.00-02-22.3 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
74.00-02-22.1 Palmer, Tony & Donna Easement
74.00-02-16 Huffman, Steven & Sandra Easement
74.00-02-06 Neely, Billy & Clydis Easement
74.00-01-40 Laplace, Roger & Suzanne Easement
74.00-01-38 Brown, William E. & Darlene K. Easement
74.00-01-36 Pavich, Jessie D. & Billie H. Easement
74.00-01-34 Aliff, Clarence, Jr., & Brenda M. Easement
74.00-01-34.1 Buck, James Easement
74.00-01-33 Austin, Samuel & Virginia Easement
74.00-01-32 Kanode, Ronald G. & Debbie W. Easement
74.00-01-31 Kanode, Roman R. & Polly S. Easement
74.00-01-25 Bryant, Allen R., Jr., & Jane Easement
74.00-01-24 Toler, Wayne M. Easement
74.00-01-21 Wimmer, Lillian Ora, Heirs Easement
74.00-01-12.2 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-12 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement
74.00-01-08.2 Wimmer, Woodrow M. & Sharon G. Easement
73.00-02-38.2 Cooper, Jerry N. & Mary G. Easement
73.00-02-37 Foster, R. N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-32 Foster, Robert N. & Mary O. Easement
73.00-02-11 Reynolds, Keith & Margaret Easement
73.00-02-10 Reynolds, Margaret T. Easement
73.00-01-71 Page, Terry J. (c/o James Page) Easement
73.00-01-68.2 Kristensen, Kim & Susanne Easement
73.00-O1-68.1 Wood, Wayne & Vicki Easement
73.00-01-68 Fisher, Curtis & Janice Easement
73.00-01-67 Joiner, Murray E. & Patricia B. Easement
73.00-01-59 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-58 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement
73.00-01-56 Fisher, Jessie & Myrtle Easement
73.00-01-8.12 Blankenship, Herbert E. &
Coleman, Dan C. Easement
73.00-01-05 Appalachian Power Company Easement
73.00-01-04 Appalachian Power Company Easement
66.04-O1-13 Renick, C. John & James Easement
66.04-01-12.2 McAden James W. Easement
66.02-01-03 Mitchell, Evelyn Marie Easement
66.01-03-19 Moran, R. L., Jr. & Martha S. Easement
66.01-03-15 Watts, George Easement
66.01-03-09 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
66.01-03-08 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement
2
~`~
TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACOUISITION
66.01-03-06 Lucado, James R. & Mary L. Easement
66.01-01-19 Akers, Gordon L. & Sandra Easement
66.01-01-17 Hale, David L. Easement
66.01-01-16 Holdren, Alan Richard Easement
66.01-01-15.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-15 Sisk, William A. & Bettle E. Easement
66.01-01-14.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement
66.01-02-09 Clingenpeel, Ronald L. & Betty Easement
66.01-01-20 Wood, Robert E., Jr. Easement
66.01-01-13 Mills, Lewis Harvey & Mary W. Easement
66.01-01-05 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-01-03 Hale, William E. Easement
66.01-01-02 Haymaker, Charlotte K. Easement
66.01-01-01 Salem, City of Easement
66.00-01-12.4 Moulse, Helen H. Easement
65.00-03-10.7 Noell, Brent L. Easement
65.00-03-10.6 Noell, Keith E. & Cathy Easement
65.00-03-10.2 Webb, Frank Wayne Easement
65.00-03-10.1 Noell, Brent L. & Susan C. Easement
65.00-03-03 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-03-02 Hedge, Willie D. & Laura K. Easement
65.00-03-01 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement
65.00-02-37 Beason, F. M. & Audrey O. Easement
65.00-02-35 Lucas, Dennis L. & Leketa C. Easement
65.00-01-43 Hudson, Grace Lee Hale Easement
65.00-01-42 Boone, Charles W. Easement
65.00-01-09 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement
65.00-01-08 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-05 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement
65.00-01-04.1 Helton, Christopher W. Easement
65.00-01-04 Barnett, Robert E. Easement
65.00-01-03 Thurman, Ellen Marie Easement
65.00-01-02 Thomas, David & Martha Easement
65.00-01-01 Mauney, Harry C. & Mary D. Easement
2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition
shall not exceed a value equal to 40~ of the current tax assessment
for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if
any; and
3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid
from the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water
Line Project funds; and,
3
4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to
accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved
by the County Attorney.
~:~si~~aaamm~u~..x
4
~-~-_ 1
-w- "` -~'
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-10 AMENDING THE ROANORE COIINTY
CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-8,
ADOPTING OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER
12, MOTOR VEHICL88 AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANORE
COIINTY CODE
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended
§ 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia to provide for the automatic
incorporation of amendments to certain sections of state law into
local ordinances which have been properly adopted without the need
for yearly reenactment by the local governing body and to permit
the incorporation of additional provisions of the state code; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 27, 1993, and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, "Adoption of state law," Article I,
"In General," of Chapter 12, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," be
amended and readopted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of
Virginia, except those provisions and requirement which, by their
very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are
hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and
made applicable within the county. References to "highways of the
state" contained in such provisions and requirement hereby adopted
shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public
ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended
from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this
chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall
be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail,
neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement;
provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the
violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the
penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby
adopted.
2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date
of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
2
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Roy B. Willett, Judge
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McG. Strickland, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery
John H. Cease, Police Chief
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Main Library
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. "~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTING OF
STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR
VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY'
This ordinance readopts Sec 12-8, Adoptinct of State Law, in
order to incorporate changes adopted by the 1993 session of the
General Assembly as well as future changes in the law.
BACKGROUND'
Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia authorizes
localities to incorporate by reference into their ordinances
appropriate provisions of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia as
well as other code sections dealing with driving offenses. In
previous years it was necessary for localities to readopt these
state code provisions each year in order to incorporate any
amendments made to the Code of Virginia by the General Assembly.
SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION:
In an amendment to § 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia this
year, the General Assembly made the adoption of such incorporating
ordinance to also include future changes made by the legislature.
Therefore, it will no longer be necessary to have the Board readopt
this section each year in order to remain in conformity with the
Code of Virginia.
FISCAL IMPACTS'
Failure to adopt this ordinance may have a negative impact on
county receipts by prohibiting certain traffic offenses being
charged as county code violations.
~`
ALTERNATIVES•
1. Adopt the proposed ordinance.
2. Retain the current section, adopted in 1992, without
incorporating the 1993 state law amendments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative # 1.
Respectfully submitted,
,J ~i
se B. Obenshain
enior Assistant County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Vote
No Yes Abs
~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTING
OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR
VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended
§ 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia to provide for the automatic
incorporation of amendments to certain sections of state law into
local ordinances which have been properly adopted without the need
for yearly reenactment by the local governing body and to permit
the incorporation of additional provisions of the state code; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 27, 1993, and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-8, "Adoption of state law," Article I,
"In General," of Chapter 12, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," be
amended and readopted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of
Virginia, except those provisions and requirement which, by their
very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are
--.~,. "'
hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and
made applicable within the county. References to "highways of the
state" contained in such provisions and requirement hereby adopted
shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public
ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended
from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this
chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall
be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail,
2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date
of its adoption.
a\wp5l~agenda\moWC Veh.ord
2
~" ~i
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGIIST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-11 AMENDING AND REENACTING
ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER
4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANORE COIINTY CODE.
WHEREAS, § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, authorizes the governing body of any county to adopt an
ordinance for the purpose of regulating any bingo game or raffle
within such county as long as not in conflict with the provisions
of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of
the Code of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the 1993 Session of the General Assembly has adopted
amendments to the above mentioned Article 1.1, Bincto and Raffles,
which necessitate corresponding amendments to the Roanoke County
Code to remove any conflict between the County Code and the Code of
Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 27, 1993; and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4,
AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and
reenacted as follow:
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
Sec. 4-86. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, the following words shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in this section:
Sec. 4-90. Participation in management, operation, or conduct
generally.
2
age and under who sell raffle tickets to raise funds for youth
activities in which they participate may receive non-monetary
incentive awards or prizes from the organization provided that
organization is non-profit.
'~i'`The spouse of any such bona f fide member or a f iref fighter
or rescue squad member employed by the county may participate in
the organization and conduct of a bingo game or raffle, if a bona
fide member is present.
§ 18.2 - 3 4 0.9 (E) #~<~~>~>>
Sec. 4-95. Limitation on value of prizes.
(a) No organization shall award any prize money or any
merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts:
(1) No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
(2 ) No regular bingo or special bingo game is shall exceed
3
one hundred dollars ($100.00).
(3) No instant bingo prize for a single card shall exceed
five hundred dollars ($500.00).
(4) No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00), nor shall the total amount
of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
(b) Any bingo game in which all the gross receipts from
players for that game are paid as prize money back to the players
shall not be subject to the limitations of this section, but there
shall not be more than one such game per calendar day of play and
the prize money from any such game shall not exceed one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00).
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-22G, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.9(G, I).
Sec. 4-97. Certificate to accompany financial report.
(a) The financial report required by section 4-96 shall be
accompanied by a certificate, verified under oath, by the board of
directors of the organization that the proceeds of any bingo games
or raffles have been used for those lawful, religious, charitable,
community or educational purposes for which the organization is
specifically chartered or organized and that the operation of bingo
games or raffles has been in accordance with this article.
(b) Any organization having annual gross receipts from bingo
games or raffles in exce ' ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::.::.~::.:~.:;~::::.;.;~::
4
thousand dollars ( $#~~Cli>;~#~'£~ ) as shown on its annual
financial report, shall attach to such report an opinion executed
by a licensed independent certified public accountant that (i) the
annual financial report presents fairly, in all material respects,
beginning cash, receipts, operating cost, use of proceeds, and
ending cash (ii) the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have
been used, in all material respects, for those lawful, religious,
charitable, community or educational purposes for which the
organization is specifically chartered or organized; and (iii) the
gross receipts have been used in all material respects in
accordance with the provisions of this article.
(c) The failure to file the opinion of a licensed independent
certified public accountant, when required, shall cause the
automatic revocation of the permit and no organization shall
conduct any bingo game or raffle thereafter until the opinion
required by this section is properly filed with the report and a
new permit obtained. The opinion required by this section is in
addition to the audit and audit fee required by Sec. 4-99.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-18, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 92689-14, § 1, 9-26-89)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.6(B).
Sec. 4-98. Additional records as to bingo games.
In addition to the records required by section 4-96, an
organization holding a permit under this article shall maintain a
record, in writing, of the dates on which bingo is played, the
number of people in attendance on each date and the amount of the
5
6
services expended by the commissioner on the audit. All audit fees
received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only
for the purposes of auditing and regulating bingo games and
raffles.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed so
as to prohibit the commissioner of revenue or any official
designated by the board of supervisors from performing unannounced
audits or restrict any right of the commissioner or such official
to secure records required to be maintained by the provisions of
this article.
(Ord. No. 2816, §§ 4-18, 4-19, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 12291-5, § 1, 1-
22-91)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§§ 18.2-340.6(C), 18.2-340.7.
Sec. 4-101. Restrictions on use of Gross Receipts from Bingo Games
or Raffles.
Except for reasonable and proper operating costs, including
costs associated with providing clerical assistance in the conduct
of bingo games or raffles for organizations composed of or for
deaf or blind persons, publicizing the time and place of bingo
games and raffles, and prizes, no part of the gross receipts
derived by an organization permitted to conduct bingo games or
raffles may be used for any purpose other than (i) those lawful
religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which
the organization is specifically chartered or organized and (ii)
expenses relating to the acquisition, construction, maintenance, or
7
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
18.2 -3 4 0.9 A `~~~`:#3'~<<~~..~~..~~.
Sec. 4-102. Regulations for instant bingo.
(a) Any organization qualified to conduct bingo games pursuant
to this article is authorized to play instant bingo as a part of
such bingo games and only at such location and such times as are
specified in the bingo permit for regular bingo games as defined in
section 4-86.
(b) The gross receipts in the course of a reporting year for
the playing of instant bingo shall not exceed ~t<` }'-==='~"-'''-""""
... -j -
---a -- ~-}~-~ Ya ( 3a ~~?) percent of the gross receipts of an
organization's bingo operation.
(c) Any organization playing instant bingo shall maintain a
record of the date, quantity and card value of instant bingo
supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier
of such instant bingo supplies. The organization shall also
maintain a written invoice or receipt from a nonmember of the
organization verifying any information required by this subsection.
8
~: :.:~ ~.;:.:. ~ ~ . .:....:: ;.... ..;..:AIL`»:::+1~:::>:::~::::;::: <~~~ .;:::::.
(d) No organization shall sell an instant bingo card to any
individual less than sixteen (16) years of age.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-17, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 92689-14, § 1, 9-26-89)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.5.
DIVISION 2. PERMIT
Sec. 4-113. Qualifications of applicant.
Prior to the issuance of a permit under this division, the
applicant organization must meet the following requirements:
(1) Except for recently established volunteer fire and rescue
companies or departments after county approval, such
organization shall have been in existence and met on a
regular basis in the county or in a county, city or town
adjacent to this county for a period of at least two (2)
years immediately prior to making application for such
permit. A permit may be issued, however, to an
organization which relocates its meeting place, on a
permanent basis, from another jurisdiction to the county
and which complies with the requirements of this
subparagraph, provided such organization was the holder
of a valid permit at the time of such relocation.
~::sIn no case shall the organization apply for or receive
9
organization and shall have been in existence as such
nonprofit organization for a period of at least two (2)
years immediately prior to making application for the
permit.
(3) Any organization whose gross receipts from all bingo
operations exceed, or can be expected to exceed, seventy-
five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) in any calendar year
shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to
section 501-(c) of the United States Internal Revenue
Code. At the same time tax-exempt status is sought from
the Internal Revenue Service, the same documentation may
be filed with the Board of Supervisors for an interim
10
certification of tax-exempt status. If such
documentation is filed, the Board of Supervisors may,
after reviewing such documentation as it may deem
necessary, issue its determination of tax-exempt status
within sixty days of receipt of such documentation. A
fee of $500.00 shall accompany any request for interim
certification of tax-exempt status; provided, however,
that such fee may be waived at the discretion of the
Board of Supervisors. This interim certification of tax-
exempt status shall be valid until the Internal Revenue
Service issues its determination of tax-exempt status, or
for eighteen months, whichever is earlier.
(4) An organization shall designate an individual who shall
be responsible for filing the annual or quarterly
financial report required by this article if the
organization goes out of business or otherwise ceases to
operate.
11
'~} ~.
~~> " ~ ~~
.: ... . " '. '.. ~ '~: ~: : '::::::.':+:~:::> ~?• ': ~":`::::::. ~::yr~::3ii:::: •:::. ;}'t.~:8. ::::i::::,.~' ;`' '~~ 'y.y'yy'a~y~.W.~:isi~?~!::~i:::::;:~1!f,.~~ .::::...............::::::.
.a~}..~yl 3~~:~}y'+~~:.>:.>:.:ak:~iR::::>:?~.i;F.::.::.»~ W:ASF::::.:::4it.7s.~Mri.{ii.::.:::::.:>:.>:.:»:::.>:.::>:?>:.>:.::::.::.::::: t.::.::.::.::.>::.>:.:»»:.::.::.::.>:.::::::.
:::::::::::.: ~::::::::::.::•:;:•:::.::•:r ••::•rr:>• •.>:.;:.>:.::.;: •.::.:i::;::;:?..::~i:~>:%~:~i~~i;::;:.; '•:i:>:::i: 'f:::;:;."•::'::;:::; '•::. ~:::::::::::y::;;.:•.:>i•>;:w•y;::~:::y:;.,; ':;;:~:y:.;:.i}•:~;.,:~:(:.•3 ..~,;:::.~:'y~:::$,:y.:,i~;:::i:..:;:".:`: ::',:~:.:ii<:~:;.:~:{::.'..•
ay...:..:.:::..:~•:y.,.y: ..:y••,,t.:.':! '.+~.' ;'~' ... .`: ':.'..~:::. ::: ::: i:3?; :.~ ~.. .: :.: ~}:::~' ':.` SAL:isis~~W:~[:~4i~:'~7;~;::;!I!l:?Fx::i#iTG,.~ir,.;~i*
p,~.~i,,.~,r,.~,47t;~M; ~.::i:.:i::i::i::i :::::::::::::iii:::::i::ii::iiii:::<:i:.>:;.:::.::.»:;;.::.::.»:.>:.::.::.:>:.::.>::.::.:::::::::::. ~::.::::::::::::.:::::......................................
..............................
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.3(1, 2, 3, 4,& 5).
Sec. 4-117. Valid only in county and at designated locations;
exception.
A permit issued under this division shall be valid only in
and their guests.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.3(2).
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be October 1, 1993.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
12
NAYS:
None
A COPY TESTE:
~7
Mary H. len, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc:
File
Circuit Court
C. O. Clemens, Judge
Kenneth Trabue, Judge
Roy B. Willett, Judge
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McG. Strickland, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Family Court Services
Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
Peggy H. Gray, Clerk
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
John L. Apostolou, Judge
George Harris, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery
John H. Cease, Police Chief
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services
Director, Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Main Library
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Code Book
13
ACTION N0.
ITEM NO. ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE V. BINGO
GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY•
These amendments incorporate the latest changes to the Code of
Virginia regulating bingo games and raffles adopted by the 1993
session of the General Assembly. In two areas, the Board of
Supervisors is given additional authority to establish standards
for operations of bingo games and raffles.
BACKGROUND•
A locality's authority to permit and control games of bingo
and raffles is strictly defined by the detailed provisions of
Article 1.1, Bincto and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Whenever the General Assembly
makes changes in this portion of the Code of Virginia, as was done
in 1993, local governing bodies must bring their local ordinances
into agreement with these Code changes.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The most significant changes which the General Assembly made
in the Bincto and Raffles Article of the Code of Virginia were to
permit localities to establish a mandatory percentage of an
organizations gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles which
must be used for its charitable purposes [Sec. 4-101] and to limit
the number of organizations for which an individual may manage,
operate or conduct bingo games [Sec. 4-90(d)]. Staff recommends
that any organization receiving a permit for a bingo game or raffle
must use twelve and one-half percent (12.5) of the gross receipts
from such an activity for its charitable, religious, educational or
community services. Other amendments will now expressly permit
"duck races" as a type of raffle and expand the category of
individuals who may "participate in the management, operation or
conduct of any bingo game or raffle" under Sec. 4-90(a). However,
no person who has been convicted of certain crimes may now
"participate" in those activities. [Sec. 4-90(e)]. The Code did
~''/
liberalize the percentage of gross receipts which may come from
instant bingo to 50$ from the previous 33 & 1/3 ~, [Sec. 4-102 (b) ] ,
and now permits raffle drawings to be conducted either in the
locality issuing the permit or in the locality where the majority
of the tickets are sold. Finally, the audit requirements were
changed yet again by exempting organizations with less than $2,000
in gross receipts from the audit requirements of Sec. 4-99, but
reverting to a threshold of $250,000 for an opinion by an indepen-
dent C.P.A. from the $500,000 figure adopted just last year [Sec.
4-97(b)]. Other incidental record keeping requirements are also
codified.
In response to an inquiry from a Board member requesting
exemption of P.T.A.s and other bona fide local organizations from
a requirement to submit copies of their membership lists, the
following language was added to Sec 4-113(6):
The Board hereby delegates to the Commissioner of the Revenue
the authority to waive the requirement to furnish its member-
ship list in those circumstances where there appears substan-
tial certainty the organization would meet this 50~ test.
FISCAL IMPACTS'
None anticipated
ALTERNATIVES'
1. Adopt this ordinance and bring the Roanoke County Code
into conformity with Virginia law.
2. Do not adopt this ordinance and risk the possibility of
our ordinance, or parts of it, being held unenforceable
as not in conformity with state law.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative # 1.
Respectfully submitted,
J eph Obenshain
S for Assistant County Attorney
2
S-~f
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
voL~
No Yes Abs
c:\wp51\agenda\bingorpc727
~ y
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE V.
BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4,
AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE.
WHEREAS, § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, authorizes the governing body of any county to adopt an
ordinance for the purpose of regulating any bingo game or raffle
within such county as long as not in conflict with the provisions
of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of
the Code of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the 1993 Session of the General Assembly has adopted
amendments to the above mentioned Article 1.1, Bincto and Raffles,
which necessitate corresponding amendments to the Roanoke County
Code to remove any conflict between the County Code and the Code of
Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 27, 1993; and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4,
AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and
reenacted as follow:
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
Sec. 4-86. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, the following words shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in this section:
.z-y
conduct of any such game or raffle. Persons empioyea ny
organizations composed of or for deaf or blind persons may receive
remuneration not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per event for
providing clerical assistance in the conduct of bingo games or
2
~~ /
raffles only for such organization. Persons eighteen (18) years of
age and under who sell raffle tickets to raise funds for youth
activities in which they participate may receive non-monetary
incentive awards or prizes from the organization provided that
organization is non-profit.
">'I'he spouse of any such bona f fide member or a f iref fighter
or rescue squad member employed by the county may participate in
the organization and conduct of a bingo game or raffle, if a bona
fide member is present.
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2 - 3 4 0.9 (E) r »>>`< .
Sec. 4-95. Limitation on value of prizes.
(a) No organization shall award any prize money or any
merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts:
(1) No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
3
.S-"
(2 ) No regular bingo or special bingo game ~' shall exceed
one hundred dollars ($100.00)..
(3) No instant bingo prize for a single card shall exceed
five hundred dollars ($500.00).
(4) No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00), nor shall the total amount
of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
(b) Any bingo game in which all the gross receipts from
players for that game are paid as prize money back to the players
shall not be subject to the limitations of this section, but there
shall not be more than one such game per calendar day of play and
the prize money from any such game shall not exceed one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00).
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-22G, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.9(G, I).
Sec. 4-97. Certificate to accompany financial report.
(a) The financial report required by section 4-96 shall be
accompanied by a certificate, verified under oath, by the board of
directors of the organization that the proceeds of any bingo games
or raffles have been used for those lawful, religious, charitable,
community or educational purposes for which the organization is
specifically chartered or organized and that the operation of bingo
games or raffles has been in accordance with this article.
(b) Any organization having annual gross receipts from bingo
4
~.." ~/
games or raffles in excess :nt.:,:::::,.::::::::~~::~::::::.:>:::~:::;.:~::::;.;:.>::::.::.;:.;~:::.;:.>:::.~::::::::
thousand dollars ( $rs~3~gf<~3i~ ) as shown on its annual
financial report, shall attach to such report an opinion executed
by a licensed independent certified public accountant that (i) the
annual financial report presents fairly, in all material respects,
beginning cash, receipts, operating cost, use of proceeds, and
ending cash (ii) the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have
been used, in all material respects, for those lawful, religious,
charitable, community or educational purposes for which the
organization is specifically chartered or organized; and (iii) the
gross receipts have been used in all material respects in
accordance with the provisions of this article.
(c) The failure to file the opinion of a licensed independent
certified public accountant, when required, shall cause the
automatic revocation of the permit and no organization shall
conduct any bingo game or raffle thereafter until the opinion
required by this section is properly filed with the report and a
new permit obtained. The opinion required by this section is in
addition to the audit and audit fee required by Sec. 4-99.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-18, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 92689-14, § 1, 9-26-89)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.6(B).
Sec. 4-98. Additional records as to bingo games.
In addition to the records required by section 4-96, an
organization holding a permit under this article shall maintain a
record, in writing, of the dates on which bingo is played, the
5
~~
6
~~
by the commissioner shall represent the amount of time and other
services expended by the commissioner on the audit. All audit fees
received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only
for the purposes of auditing and regulating bingo games and
raffles.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed so
as to prohibit the commissioner of revenue or any official
designated by the board of supervisors from performing unannounced
audits or restrict any right of the commissioner or such official
to secure records required to be maintained by the provisions of
this article.
(Ord. No. 2816, §§ 4-18, 4-19, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 12291-5, § 1, 1-
22-91)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§§ 18.2-340.6(C), 18.2-340.7.
Sec. 4-101. Restrictions on use of Gross Receipts from Bingo Games
or Raffles.
Except for reasonable and proper operating costs, including
costs associated with providing clerical assistance in the conduct
of bingo games or raffles for organizations composed of or for
deaf or blind persons, publicizing the time and place of bingo
games and raffles, and prizes, no part of the gross receipts
derived by an organization permitted to conduct bingo games or
raffles may be used for any purpose other than (i) those lawful
religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which
the organization is specifically chartered or organized and (ii)
7
""'•
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
Sec. 4-102. Regulations for instant bingo.
(a) Any organization qualified to conduct bingo games pursuant
to this article is authorized to play instant bingo as a part of
such bingo games and only at such location and such times as are
specified in the bingo permit for regular bingo games as defined in
section 4-86.
(b) The gross receipts in the course of a reporting year for
the playing of instant bingo shall not exceed ?'' i`-=-'"}" '"`""""
... - .l
-- a -. ~-+-~-; ~-~ -- (qi ~~ ~) percent of the gross receipts of an
organization's bingo operation.
(c) Any organization playing instant bingo shall maintain a
record of the date, quantity and card value of instant bingo
supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier
of such instant bingo supplies. The organization shall also
maintain a written invoice or receipt from a nonmember of the
8
L/
organization verifying any information required by this subsection.
... .
(d) No organization shall sell an instant bingo card to any
individual less than sixteen (16) years of age.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-17, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 92689-14, § 1, 9-26-89)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.5.
DIVISION 2. PERMIT
Sec. 4-113. Qualifications of applicant.
Prior to the issuance of a permit under this division, the
applicant organization must meet the following requirements:
(1) Except for recently established volunteer fire and rescue
companies or departments after county approval, such
organization shall have been in existence and met on a
regular basis in the county or in a county, city or town
adjacent to this county for a period of at least two (2)
years immediately prior to making application for such
permit. A permit may be issued, however, to an
organization which relocates its meeting place, on a
permanent basis, from another jurisdiction to the county
and which complies with the requirements of this
subparagraph, provided such organization was the holder
of a valid permit at the time of such relocation.
9
~r
organization and shall have been in existence as such
nonprofit organization for a period of at least two (2)
years immediately prior to making application for the
permit.
(3) Any organization whose gross receipts from all bingo
operations exceed, or can be expected to exceed, seventy-
five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) in any calendar year
shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to
section 501-(c) of the United States Internal Revenue
Code. At the same time tax-exempt status is sought from
the Internal Revenue Service, the same documentation may
10
be filed with the Board of Supervisors for an interim
certification of tax-exempt status. If such
documentation is filed, the Board of Supervisors may,
after reviewing such documentation as it may deem
necessary, issue its determination of tax-exempt status
within sixty days of receipt of such documentation. A
fee of $500.00 shall accompany any request for interim
certification of tax-exempt status; provided, however,
that such fee may be waived at the discretion of the
Board of Supervisors. This interim certification of tax-
exempt status shall be valid until the Internal Revenue
Service issues its determination of tax-exempt status, or
for eighteen months, whichever is earlier.
(~) An organization shall designate an individual who shall
be responsible for filing the annual or quarterly
financial report required by this article if the
organization goes out of business or otherwise ceases to
operate.
11
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.3(1, 2, 3, 4,& 5).
Sec. 4-117. valid only in county and at designated locations;
exception.
A permit issued under this division shall be valid only in
and their guests.
(Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81)
State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia,
§ 18.2-340.3(2).
2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be October 1, 1993.
c:\wp51\agenda~ce\bingord.T27
12
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER ~"I "'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and
Boards
COUNTY ADMINI$TRATOR~B COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Grievance Panel
Two-year term of Cecil Hill will expire September 27, 1993.
Two-year term of Joy A. Herbert, Alternate will expire October
10, 1993. Ms. Herbert is moving out of the Roanoke Valley and
is not eligible to serve another term.
2. Industrial Development Authority
Four-year terms of Billy H. Branch and W. Darnall Vinyard will
expire September 26, 1993.
3. Virginia Western Community Collette Board
Unexpired four-year term of Patrick N. Shafner. Mr. Shafner
has moved out of Roanoke County and is no longer eligible to
serve on the Board as a Roanoke County appointee. His term
will expire June 30, 1995.
Submitted by:
~~~~.~~
Mary H. Allen, CMC
Clerk to the Board
Approved by:
~ ~~
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Adminis ator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
K~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION 82493-12 APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET-FORTH ON TH8 BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for August 24, 1993 designated as Item K - Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - July 13, 1993, July 27, 1993
2. Confirmation of Appointments to Community
Corrections Resources Board and the Social Services
Advisory Board.
3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit From the
Cave Spring Elementary School PTA.
4. Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for
Lease/Purchases of Fire & Rescue Vehicles
5. Request for Acceptance Olney Road and Corllens Lane
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
6. Authorization to Pay Legal Fees for Firetruck
Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company.
7. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer Easement in Connection
with the Route 11 Project of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
8. Donation of a Sanitary Sewer and Water Line
Easements in Connection with the T.C.E. Projects.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~-
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
~- I
~3~
July 13, 1993
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
July 13, 1993
The Board of Supervisors of ~Zoanoke County, Virginia, met
this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the
second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month
of July, 1993.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 n.m.
The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman
Lee B. Eddy, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Edward G.
Kohinke, Sr., Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk;
John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator;
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator;
Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, Jr.,
Assistant County Administrator.
The Pledge of Allegiance was
recited by all present.
~ ~t
July 13, 1993
approve the appropriation up to $62,000. The motion carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
2. Rewest for Appropriation to Fund Frozen Position
in the Clerk__of Circuit Court's Office (Steven
McGraw, Clerk of Circuit Court)
A-71393-2
Mr. McGraw advised that he was requesting to fill this
position because of an increased work load in recorded
instruments, and increases in the civil and criminal caseload.
He reported that the Clerk's Office brings in $900,000 in fees
and only uses $200,000 in local funding. He requested that the
Board appropriate $26,400 from the Board Contingency Fund for a
Deputy Clerk III position.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the appropriation
of $26,400 from the Board Contingency Fund. The motion carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: OLD BUSINESS
1. Request for Approval of Proposed Legislative
Requests for Virginia Association of Counties
(CONTINUED FROM JUNE 22. 1993) (Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney)
~3fi
July 13, 1993
1995), or
B. guarantee market prices for recyclable
materials,
4.
5.
6.
7.
Social Services
I. Increase administrative funding for the Comprehen-
sive Services Act.
II. Monitor HJR 603 Task Force on Restructuring Vir-
ginia's Long Term Care for the Elderly.
Libraries
I. Full funding of State Aid for Public Libraries
II. Approximately 77$ of funds required under formula
(Sec. 42.1-48) are appropriated in State budget.
Treasurer
I. Amend Sec. 58.1-3013 to require credit card compa-
nies to honor local ordinances authorizing the
payment of local taxes by credit card and imposing
a service charge not to exceed 4$ of the amount
due.
DUI
I. Increase penalties for DUI violations.
II. Improve and toughen enforcement of DUI statutes.
8. Equalize the taxing and borrowing powers of counties
with those powers granted municipalities.
9. Support the recommendations of the Governor's Advisory
Commission on the Dillon Rule and Local Government.
10. Support the reduction of unfunded regulatory and statu-
tory mandates, and oppose any state mandates on local
governments without sufficient funding to cover the
costs of these mandates.
11. Expand the revenue powers and authority of local
governments, including authority to levy a tobacco tax,
and to provide for a local option income tax.
12. Continue the moratorium on any city annexation and city
~3 $
July 13, 1993
Mr. Gubala reported that Supervisor Eddy had forwarded
suggested modifications to the policy. He advised that he would
like to retain the flexibility in the proposed policy and 50$
participation to encourage companies to participate.
No action was taken, and staff was directed to bring
back a revised copy of the policy which would include Supervisor
Eddy's suggestion, but retain the flexibility and 50$
participation. Supervisor giddy and Mr. Gubala will work on the
matrix.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. ordinance Amendin and Reenactin Section 5-21
Definitions and 5-44, Tax Imposed, Addiny Sections
5-26.1 to 5-26.5 and Repealing Section 5-26 of
Article II. Dogs, Cats and Other Animals of
Chanter 5, Animals and Fowl of the Roanoke County
Code to Control Dangerous and vicious Doqs.
(Renneth Hoaaa, Chief Animal Control Officer)
Mr. Hogan cited examples of vicious dog problems that
would be resolved with this ordinance. He advised that such dogs
will be required to have a special blaze orange dog tag and
leash.
Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the first reading
of the ordinance and set the second reading for July 27, 1993.
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
~~
July 13, 1993
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for July 13, 1993, designated as Item K - Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each
item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 3, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meetings - May 25, 1993, June 8, 1993,
June 22, 1993.
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Social Services Advisory Board
3. Donation of Drainage Easements on Lots 18 and 19,
Section 3, Plantation Gardens Subdivision.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent
Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQOIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Sut~ervisor Kohinke• (1) He advised that he threw the
opening ball at the Dixie Girls Softball League and that John
Chambliss caught the ball. He thanked the staff for their
participation. (2) He attended the West County Civic League
Meeting. He thanked the staff for attending and making a
presentation. (3) Following the meeting, he asked the Clerk to
`t
July 13
local government attorneys and the Public Safety Team. Mr. Hodge
will discuss this at the next local government quarterly meeting.
(2) He asked for a list of the departments that had cost
overruns and a list of departments with positive cash flows. Mr.
Hodge responded that he would provide the information. (3) He
asked about a response to the letter from a citizen who
complained about having to pay duplicate fees. Mr. Hodge advised
that he had responded to the citizen, anti will send a copy of the
response to the board members. (4) He asked about a response to
Fred Anderson's memorandum on the salary survey appeals process.
Mr. Hodge advised that he had responded and placed a copy of the
response in the Board Reading File.
Supervisor Johnson: (1) He asked Mr. Hodge to provide
a copy of the memorandum to Fred Anderson for each board member.
(2) He asked Mr. Mahoney to study what could happen if Roanoke
City dropped its charter, but advised that he did not want the
staff spending time and money on consolidation issue. (3) He
recommended that the Board review a book published by the
Virginia Education Association and advised that Virginia ranks
43rd in taxes at the state and local level.
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the
following reports. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
1. General Fund IInappropriated Balance
?. Capital Fund IInaDprooriated Balance
44 4
July 13, 1993
2. Commission on Population Growth
Planning and Zoning Director Terry Harrington reported
that the Commission on Population Growth and Development was
created by the General Assembly in 1990 to: (1) study and
evaluate consequences of changes in populations and development;
(2) develop initiatives to ensure adequate planning to guide
population growth; (3) recommend alternative measures to fund
statement infrastructure improvement; (4) propose innovative land
management techniques (5) evaluate ways to coordinate efforts to
address matters of population growth; and (6) reports its
findings and make recommendations to the General Assembly.
Mr. Harrington presented the major components of the
Virginia Growth Strategies Act which will require the Governor to
prepare and implement a Virginia Growth Strategies Plan (VGSP)
and create a new state department of Planning and Budget (DPB).
He described how these plans will affect Roanoke County as
follows: (1) Revision of the Comprehensive Plan must be
consistent with the VGSP and submitted to DPB and to neighboring
jurisdiction for review. (2) A Capital Improvement Program must
be prepared on a yearly basis consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan; (3) The subdivision ordinance should be revised to
implement the Comprehensive Plan; and (4) mandatory membership is
required on the Fifth PDC with the Board Chairman and County
Administrator serving as the members.
Mr. Harrington asked that the Board send him comments
to forward to the Commission.
July 13, 1993
X46
which will be brought back to the Board.
4. Refuse Collection
General Services Director Gardner Smith presented
slides outlining the history of refuse collection in Roanoke
County and Assistant Director Don Myers described the costs for
refuse collection since 1985-86. He also presented a cost
comparison of collecting refuse by automation versus rear
loaders. Staff presented four options for future refuse
collection including the implementation of twice-monthly
collection of bulk and brush. Following discussion, the
consensus of the Board was four to one in opposition to expanding
the bulk and brush collection to twice a month.
Staff was directed to bring back future cost overruns
when they become a problem, and not wait until the end of the
fiscal year.
IN RE: ERECOTIVE SESSION
At 7:15 p.m., Supervisor Kohinke moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a)
(7) Consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff
members, pertaining to probable litigation, condemnation of an
easement across real estate owned by Janosko, Casey, Boone and
Wallace for the water transmission project; and a claim for
damages to real property arising from certain utility operations,
and Norma J. Sigmon v. Board of Supervisors and Boone, Boone &
July 13, 1993
:# ~ ~
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that,
to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in
the executive :~eeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were
heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, ~Iirginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the
Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
ZN RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 8:36 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman
~->
July 27, 1993
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
July 27, 1993
~i ~ J
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met
this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the
second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month
of July, 1993.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m.
The roll call was taken.
MEMBERB PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman
Lee B. Eddy, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Edward G.
Kohinke, Sr., Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M.
Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy
Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County
Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director,
Community Relations
July 27, 1993 ~ ~ '~
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
RE8OLIITION 72793-1 DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF JIILY 31 - AIIGIIST 1,
1993, AB 'THE BATTLE OF SOIITH BALEM~~
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, Confederate forces, under the
leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under the
leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle at
Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 419 in
Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near the
confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in Roanoke
County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engagement; and
WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the
Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and
WHEREAS, on July 31 and August 1, 1993, there will be a re-
enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000
spectators and 500 re-enactors and contributes to the tourism efforts
of the Roanoke Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the weekend of July 31 -
August 1, 1993, as "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM", and extends its best
wishes for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and
carried by a unanimous voice vote:
July 27, 1993 "t ~ +J
WHEREAS, Ms. Busher also expended time and energy for the
betterment of the entire Roanoke Valley, particularly through her work
with TRUST, the Jaycees, and the Regional Chamber of Commerce.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, extends its appreciation to
BETA R. BUSHER for the dedication and service which she has provided
to the Board, the citizens and the staff of Roanoke County; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
extends its best wishes to Ms. Busher as she assumes her new position
in Henrico County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: BRIEFINGS
1. Briefinc on Improvements to the CSrP Telephone Svstem.
(Don Reid, Manacer)
Mr. Reid described changes in C&P's long-range plans due to
recent legislation which allows a different method of regulating
telephone companies. Among the changes, he advised that toll charges
in contiguous exchanges will be eliminated.
?. uarterl Re ort on 1991 Water Pro'ects. Clifford
Craig, IItility DirectorL
A quarterly update on the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project,
July 27, 1993 ~ 5 5
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
RESOLII'I'ION 72793-3 APPROVING THE SIIHMISSION OF FIVE
ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS.
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia:
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation
Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a
request by resolution be received from the local government in
order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an
enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting five
transportation enhancement project applications and has reviewed
and prioritized the applications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, requests•the Commonwealth Transportation Board
to establish the following improvement projects:
Green Hill Park, with priority #1
Vinyard Park, with priority #2
Goode Park Trail, with priority #3
Starkey/Shell Park, with priority #4
Roadside Dumps, with priority #5
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke,
Virginia hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for
planning and design, right-of-way, and construction of these
projects, and that, if the County of Roanoke, Virginia
July 27, 1993
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
J
RESOLIITION 72793-4 ENDORSING THE SIIBMISSION OF AN
ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
APPLICATION BY THE RIVER FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation
Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a
request by resolution be received from the local government in
order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an
enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia requests the
Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the
improvement of a light vehicle and pedestrian wooden bridge at
the Explore Park; and
2. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees
to pay 20 percent of the total cost for planning and design,
right-of-way and construction of this project, up to a maximum of
$50,000 which was approved for Explore Park capital expenses by
the Board of Supervisors in their fiscal year 1993-94 budget; and
3. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia will not be
held responsible for additional funds beyond that amount; and
4• That by letter dated July 22, 1993, the River
Foundation agrees to be responsible for cost overruns associated
with the projects, and if the River Foundation subsequently
July 27, 1993
45 9
Chapter 24, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the
governing bodies of the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, and
Town of Vinton desire to petition the Court for approval to
relocate portions of the boundary line between the City of
Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke; and
WHEREAS, the relocation of the boundary line of such
governmental entities in the areas proposed will permit more
effective and efficient delivery of municipal services and
promote the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the City and the Town
have adopted measures reflecting their desires to relocate and
change a portion of the boundary line between the County, City
and Town as requested by certain property owners within said
areas; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vinton and City of Roanoke have
agreed to the boundary relocation by action of their respective
governing bodies.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, that:
1. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby
authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Roanoke,
the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke, in form approved
by the County Attorney, establishing a new boundary line at
certain points between said jurisdictions as more particularly
described in the plat showing a boundary map line adjustment Area
I containing 33.80 acres and plat showing boundary map line
July 27, 1993
~+ ~ 1
to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Town Clerk
of the Town of Vinton and the City Clerk of the City of Roanoke.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: OLD BIISZNE88
1. Re est for Reado tion of the Public Private
Partnership Policy. (Continued from July 13, 1993)
(Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director)
R-72793-6
Mr. Gubala advised that the majority of Supervisor
Eddy's modifications requested at the July 13, 1993 meeting have
been incorporated into the expanded policy. This policy will now
include non-manufacturing companies, tourism related industries
and activities and employment training. He requested that the
Public Private Partnership Policy be readopted by resolution.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
RE80LIITION 72793-6 READOPTING A PIIBLIC PRIPATE
PARTNERSHIP POLICY FOR ROANORE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the expenditure of public funds for the
general purpose of promoting Roanoke County's commercial,
July 27, 1993
4 6 3 -:
business that meets the evaluation criteria for public
private (P/P) partnerships.
2. Roanoke County may encourage the creation or retention
of jobs of qualifying companies within the community
which employ a significant number of employees through
assistance with employment training.
3• Roanoke County may support tourism related industry/
destination activities that provide a range of
attractions for visitors from outside the Roanoke
Valley.
Applications:
A business or industry may apply for County assistance by
addressing a letter to the Director of Economic Development that
indicates:
a. a description of the business or tourism activity
to be conducted on the site
b. total capital investment in real estate (land,
building) machinery and tools and anticipated
personal property and/or other taxes paid on site
c. total employment and annual payroll and jobs to be
created or retained
d. specific water and sewer needs (i.e., size line
and/or capacity) or other public facility
assistance required
e. date of construction and/or start-up (if in an
existing building)
f. if applicable, the terms of any lease to ensure
that the company will occupy the building during
the period calculated for payback.
Review•
The Director of Economic Development, upon consultation with the
County Administrator and other County staff, will review the
request for participation to determine the extent of Roanoke
County's funding. An evaluation method based on anticipated
taxes (real estate, machinery and tools and personal property),
payback, number and type of employees, likelihood of future
growth, and other factors will be used. The County may
participate in up to 50~ of public improvement costs of the
project if payback occurs within the first three years of the new
July 27, 1993
46~
County Administrator upon the recommendation of
the Director of Economic Development.
d. Applications which fall outside the criteria
stated above, but which are considered by the
County Administrator and Director of Economic
Development to have merit, will be submitted to
the Board of Supervisors for consideration.
e. Tourism projects will be evaluated on the basis of
expected visitation and concentration of tourism
activities in areas proposed by the Economic
Development Strategy, as well as other criteria
for new jobs and anticipated tax revenues.
f. Public Private Partnership funds shall be paid
after the approval of the required site plan and
at the time that a building permit is issued for
the project.
Industrial Park Development
Off-site fees of jointly developed parks shall not be held as a
portion of the total cost of the project and thus not a portion
of the payback equation. Such assistance shall be funded after
the approval of the required site plan and at the time a building
permit is issued for the project.
Limitations•
Roanoke County will not pay for any private sewage pre-treatment
facilities or waive any ordinances requiring fire protection or
industrial discharge certification.
Fundinq Sources:
Roanoke County shall fund its participation from the General Fund
from anticipated tax revenue, or from an Economic Development
Fund or other special non-utility funds. There is an intent to
continue the maintenance of a fiscally sound utility enterprise
fund to provide water and sewer service to County utility
customers. (This provision is authorized by County Code Chapter
22 as amended by Ordinance 8-12-86-169, Section 3b.)
AQreement•
A written agreement on a form approved by the County Attorney
will be required to specify terms of each Public Private
Partnership.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the
July 27, 1993
~n~
2. Ordinance Amendinc and Reenacting Section 12-8,
Ado~tinc of State LaM of Article I, of Chapter 12.
Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke Countv
Code. (Paul Mahonev, County Attorney)
Mr. Mahoney advised that this ordinance is necessary to
incorporate the latest amendments to the Code of Virginia made by
the General Assembly. There was no discussion.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading
and set the second reading for August 24, 1993. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
3. Ordinance Amendin and Reenactin Article V. Bin o
Games and Raffles of Chanter 4, Amusements of the
Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, Countv
Attorney)
Mr. Mahoney advised that this ordinance is necessary to
incorporate the latest amendments to the Code of Virginia made by
the General Assembly. There was no discussion.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading
and set the second reading for August 24, 1993. The motion
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
Supervisor Eddy requested that staff bring back to the
July 27, 1993
't b J
SECTIONS 5-21, DEFINITIONS, AND 5-44 TAB
IMPOSED, ADDING SECTIONS 5-26.1 TO 5-26.5 AND
REPEALING SECTION 5-26 OF ARTICLE II. DOGS,
CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS
AND FOWL OF THE ROANOlCE CODIJTY CODE TO
CONTROL DANGEROIIS AND VICI008 DOGS.
WHEREAS, injury or death to innocent children and
adults has become a more serious problem in the Roanoke Valley in
recent years; and
WHEREAS, the current definition of vicious dog
contained in Sec. 5-26 of the Roanoke County Code is not
sufficiently detailed or comprehensive to deal with the many and
varied situations which the County's Animal Control Officers are
called upon to handle; and
WHEREAS, neighboring jurisdictions to ~he County of
Roanoke have recently amended their animal control ordinances to
exFand the power of their Animal Control Officers to deal with
dangerous and vicious dogs; and
WHEREAS the first reading of this ordinance was held on
July 13, 1993; and the second reading on July 27, 1993.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article II. Doors, Cats, and Other Animals of
Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL of the Roanoke County Code be amended
and reenacted as follows:
sec. 5-21. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, the following words
and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this
July 27, 1993
4 i _j
(3) above shall be a "vicious dog" even though not previously
found vicious by any Court.
eg--w~r~eh•-~~~rew~-te--b ' e~e~ or--.~~~~a-~
es~e~--te a~ae~ '' '' e~g~ o~--moo-',i=re ~
a~~'~~lf-eti~-a~ta~s-:-H~ge~r-ee~~e~-e~-e€-a~~e,~eras ~~~-e~e~
e f~~-.g ee~e~t-hedge-e€-~~re~ ~-~~~g~e eas ~~--e~e~
~hEi- .. ~ a. r9==i@ei~-Ai°--6~rier9~~~ein--~9-r~sasaarre}'t--}~ ' ~ ~ ~q
~*'
Sec. 5-26.1. Dangerous dogs; vicious dog; penalties;
procedures.
(a) Dangerous dog. It shall be unlawful and a class 1
misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit
to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or
reasonably should have known to be a dangerous dog, as defined by
Section 5-21, except in strict compliance with Section 5-26.3 of
this Code. If after hearing evidence, the Court finds any dog to
be a dangerous dog, the Court shall, in addition to any other
penalties imposed, order the dog's owner to comply with the
provisions of Section 5-26.3. If any owner knew or reasonably
should have known any dog to be a dangerous dog and such dog
thereafter causes a wound to any person, such owner shall be
guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
(b) Vicious doer. It shall be unlawful and a Class 1
misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit
July 27, 1993
4~~
dog's collar and ensure that the dog wears collar and tag at all
times. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be
renewed annually as required by Section 5-41 of this Code.
(b) No dangerous dog license shall be issued until the
applicant has filed with the Treasurer the insurance certificate
required by Sec. 5-26.3(c). The Treasurer shall immediately
forward such certificate to the County's Risk Manager for review
and filing. The Risk Manager shall immediately notify the animal
control officer of any noncompliance with the provisions of Sec.
5-26.3(c) of which the Risk Manager becomes aware.
Sec. 5-26.3 Reepinq dangerous dogs; conditions.
It shall be unlawful for any owner of any dangerous dog
to own, keep, or harbor any such dog within the County except in
compliance with each of the following conditions and
specifications:
(a) Any dangerous dog shall be securely confined
indoors or, if kept outdoors, shall be kept in a securely
enclosed and locked pen or structure adequate to confine the dog
and located upon the premises of the owner of the dog. Any such
pen or structure shall have secure sides and a secure top and, if
it has no bottom secured to the sides, the sides shall be
imbedded into the ground no less than two (2) feet. Such pen or
structures shall provide any such dog with adequate space and
protection from the elements and shall be kept in a clean and
sanitary condition.
(b) The owner of any dangerous dog shall display two
July 27, 1993
X75
interfere with its vision or respiration.
(f) The owner of any dangerous dog shall notify the
Animal Control Department within twenty-four (24) hours if such
dog is loose or missing; if such dog has attacked or wounded a
human being or another animal; or if such dog has been sold,
leased, given away, died, or custody has been transferred to
another person for more than forty-eight (48) hours. If such dog
has been sold, leased, given away, or custody has been so
transferred, the owner shall provide the Animal Control
Department with the name, address, and telephone number of the
new owner, lessee, or custodian who shall be required to comply
with the conditions of this Section if the dog is kept within the
County. If the owner of a dangerous dog moves such dog to a
different address, such owner shall notify the Animal Control
Department of such fact and the new address within twenty-four
(24) hours.
(g) The animal control officer and/or police officer
shall be permitted the right to inspect the enclosure in which
any dangerous dog is kept at any time.
(h) In addition to the conditions and specifications
established by this Section with respect to dangerous dogs, the
owner of any dangerous dog shall meet all other requirements
established by this Article for keeping any dog.
(i) The animal control officer and/or police officer
shall have the right to seize and impound the dog if any of the
conditions and specifications established by this Section for the
X71
Julp 27, 1993
amounts:
(6) Dangerous dog, as declared by any General District
Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth: Fifty Dollars
($50.00) (in addition to the other applicable fees herein).
2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the
date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
1. Community Corrections Resource Board.
Supervisor Eddy nominated Edmund Kielty to serve
another one-year term as an regular member, and Mrs. Chris
Pickard to serve another one-year term as an alternate members.
Both terms will expire August 31, 1994.
2. Social Services Advisory Board.
Supervisor Johnson nominated Mary Anderson to serve a
four-year term representing the Hollins District. Her term will
expire August 1, 1997.
IN RBi CONBENT AGENDA
July 27, 1993
~7~
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent
Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
RESOLIITION 72793-S.b OF SIIPPORT AND ENDORSEMENT OF
RICffiKOND COIINTY~B RESOLIITION FOR CONTINIIED STATE
FIINDING OF PROGRAMS TO ACCELERATE T8E INSTALLATION OF
DRY FIRE HYDRANTS
WHEREAS, a dry hydrant is a nonpressurized pipe system
that is installed in an existing lake, pond, or stream to provide
an easily accessible source of year-round water for firefighting;
and
WHEREAS, with installation of dry fire hydrants,
homeowners and property owners would receive improved fire
protection that would reduce loss of life and property; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly passed legislation in
1992 which requested a plan be developed that identified the
needed network of dry hydrant sites in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Forestry completed
an inventory that documented the need for 3,678 dry hydrant
installations at an estimated cost of $7.3 million; and
WHEREAS, the state appropriated funds to be spent in
FY 1993 and FY 1994 to initiate a demonstration program which
provided cost share monies to fire departments to install dry
hydrants.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports and endorses
July 27, 1993
4$ ~
Sligh. (3) He advised that he will be on vacation between now
and the next board meeting, 8/24/93.
Supervisor Minnix: He advised that he visited some of
the precincts in his district and from information received, does
not think that the citizens have changed their minds and would
support consolidation. He expressed his desire to cooperate with
the Valley governments.
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the
following reports after discussion of Items 1, 5, and 6. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
1. General Fund IInappropriated Balance
Supervisor Nickens requested that future reports
include the goal of 6.25$ in a dollar amount.
2. Capital Fund ynapproQriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid - June, 1993
5. Report on Private Sanitary sealer
Evaluation/Rehabilitation (ssE/R) Program.
6. Report on Bond Projects.
IN RE: E%ECIITIVE SEBSION
At 4:30 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-
344 A (7) To discuss specific legal matters requiring the
July 27, 1993
ij ~
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that,
to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were
identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were
heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the
Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: PQBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
i. ordinance Amending and Reenacting ordinance 82592-
12, The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, by
the Adoption of certain Provisions concerainc
Amateur Radio Towers in the various Zoninc
Districts of the County. (Postponed frog June 22.
July 27, 1993
4S5
Supervisor Johnson amended his motion to approve the
first reading, set the second reading for August 24, 1993, and
change the implementation date to be effective upon the second
reading. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution
Rewestinc the Circuit court of Roanoke county to
Enter an Order to Hold a Referendum on the
Question of Changing the Method of Selection of
Members of the Count School Board as Provided in
Section 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
Amended. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
R-72793-10
Mr. Mahoney advised that this is a public hearing on
the adoption of a resolution requesting that a referendum be held
on changing the method of selection of members of the school
board from appointment by the school board selection commission
to appointment by the governing body of the County.
The following citizens spoke in favor of having the
school board elected by the people and opposed the Board
approving the resolution: (1) Cathy Atkins. 5138 Britaney Road;
(2) Lisa Merrill, 10721 Bent Mountain Road; (3) Dot Eller, 3611
McDaniel Drive; (4) Pauline Johnson, 6511 Woodbrook Drive; (5)
William Russell, 6079 Oriole Lane; (6) C. E. Thornton. 1007
July
County School Board of Roanoke
22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Vi
WHEREAS, the Board
question of such referendum on
Roanoke County Administration
and
48~
27, 1993
County, Virginia, as provided by §
rginia, as amended; and
held a public hearing on the
July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. at the
Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue;
WHEREAS, said public hearing was advertised in the
Roanoke Times and World News on July 18 and July 25, 1993.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board does
respectfully request the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter
an order requiring the regular election officials on the day
fixed in such order to open the polls and take the sense of the
qualified voters of Roanoke County on the question of changing
the method of appointment of members of the County School Board
of Roanoke County from the School Board Selection Commission to
the Board of Supervisors.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is
hereby directed to certify a copy of this resolution and to
present it to the Judge of the Circuit Court for the County of
Roanoke, and to file a certified copy of this resolution with the
Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: Supervisor Johnson
July 27, 1993
attached construction program allocations.
48 9
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia
Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a
duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six-Year
Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94 by
the Clerk to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
3.
R-72793-12
Public Hearinc for the Consideration of
AcQttisition by Condemnation of Easements Across
Property Owned by Jean O. Wallace, George R. and
Wanda C. Janosko, Char es W. Boone, and
Accuisition of Property owned by Heirs at LaM of
James W. Casev, Jr. and Margarette E Case,
(Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
William B. Hopkins, Jr., Counsel for Roanoke County,
advised that a settlement has been reached with George R. and
Wanda C. Janosko, and they should be removed from this action.
He requested approval of the resolution. There were no citizens
to speak at this public hearing.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution with
~9 ~
Julp 27, 1993
needs to acquire an interest in the properties described below:
(a) OWNER: Jean O. Wallace; property
description:
Parcel of land located on Brahma
Road and Burnham Road, Roanoke
County, Virginia
(Roanoke County Tax Map No. 76.03-3-70)
See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT A"
showing water and sewer easement to be acquired from Jean O.
Wallace.
(c) OWNER: Col. Charles W. Boone; property
description:
Parcel of land located off of
Lapping Lane, Roanoke County,
Virginia
(Roanoke County Tax Map No. 65.00-1-42)
See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT C"
showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction
easement to be acquired from Col. Charles W. Boone.
(d) OWNER: Heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr.
July 27, 1993 ~ ~ 3
enter upon and take possession of the properties described above
and commence construction of such water transmission lines and
any other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to
more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County
and to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings
as to the above-described property as provided by law and by this
resolution the County hereby states its intent to do so.
8. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-
238(E) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Board finds
that it is necessary to be vested with those powers granted the
Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Sections
33.1-119 through 33.1-129, both inclusive, in order to enter upon
the property to be condemned prior or during the condemnation
proceeding for the construction of water transmission lines and
any other appurtenances to the water supply system as described
above.
9. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
hereby condemn the interest in the properties shown on Exhibit A,
C and D attached hereto and made a part of this resolution and
authorizes the County Administrator and the County Attorney to
sign all papers and documents necessary to this end on behalf of
the County.
10. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors shall
in accordance with Section 15.1-238(E) of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, be vested with those powers granted to the
Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Section
July 27, 1993
49 ~
District, IInon the Petition of Mason cove Chapel.
(Terry Harrington. Planning ~ Zoning Director)
0-72793-13
Mr. Harrington advised that this is a request to obtain
a special use permit to expand an existing church building and
permit plans for a future expansion. Staff does not anticipate
any negative impacts associated with the expansion, and the
Planning Commission recommends approval of the request.
There was no discussion and no citizens requested to
speak at this public hearing.
Supervisor Kohinke moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 72793-13 GRANTING A SPECIAL IIBE
PERMIT TO THE TRIIBTBEB OF THE MASON COVE
CHAPEL TO ALLOR THE EBPANSION OF AN E%ISTING
CHIIRCH BIIILDING LOCATED AT 3917 OLD CATAWBA
ROAD (TAB PARCEL 15.02-1-10) CATAWBA Z~IAGISTE-
RIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Trustees of Mason Cove Chapel have filed a
petition to allow the expansion of an existing church building
located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial
District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing
on this matter on July 6, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Julp 27, 1993
~~~
0-72783-14
Mr. Harrington advised that this request is to rezone
property to construct a two family dwelling. The property is
adjacent to other duplex developments in the area and the impact
on neighboring properties will be minimal. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
Charles H. Osterhoudt, Attorney, spoke on behalf of the
petitioner.
There was no discussion and no citizens requested to
speak at this public hearing.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 72793-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.410 ACRE TRACT OF REAL
ESTATE LOCATED WEST OF 6707/6705 WOOD HAVEN
ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 26.20-4-33) IN THE HOLLINS
MAGIBTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING
CLABBIFICATION OF R-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF
MARTHA W. CO%
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on June 22, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was
held July 27, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this matter on July 6, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been
July 27, 1993
#9 9
Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1123, page
588.
4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning
Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to
reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this
ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCEB
1. ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoninc
District Maos for Roanoke County, by the Ado tion
of Certain Miscellaneous Changes Throughout the
County to said MaDB (Bonsack. Cotton Hill, Poaaes
valley Road) (Terry Harrington. Planning ~ Zoning
Director)
Mr. Harrington advised that in December, 1992, as part
of the comprehensive rezoning of Roanoke County, the Board zoned
four large areas in proximity to the Blue Ridge Parkway AG-1. In
January, 1993, the Blue Ridge Parkway Committee was formed to
July 27, 1993
50 ~
Parkway, representing Parkway Superintendent Gary Everhardt. He
advised that Blue Ridge Parkway position was that critical areas
be protected with a "no build" policy.
8. Len Boone. 5282 Hunting Hills Square, Boone, Boone
& Loeb, contractual owner of Beasley property, - supports
rezonings.
9. Steven Strauss. 2776 Bobolin Lane, Strauss
Construction Corporation, - supports rezonings.
10. Richard S. Whitney Jr , 5346 Castle Rock Road,
Task Force, Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association - supports
rezonings.
11. Jack Loeb, 5128 Crossbow Circle, Boone, Boone &
Loeb - supports rezonings.
12. Darrell Branstetter. 6613 Sylvan Brook Road - has
138 acres near parcels to be rezoned and feels that County has
not treated everyone equally.
13. Ed Natt. 4803 Topping Hill Drive - supports
rezonings.
14. Brad McGraw. Wooten & Hart, P. O. Box 12247,
representing the Citizens for Responsible Rural Development, -
opposes rezonings.
15. David Sligh, 7917 Bradshaw Road, Salem - opposes
rezonings.
16. Vasile Gocan, 6225 Cotton Hill Road - opposes
rezonings.
17. Robert Fetzer, Acting President, Roanoke Regional
ACTION NO.
A-82493-12.a
ITEM NUMBER ~ '"'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Social Services Advisory Board and the Court
Community Resources Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: '
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the July 13, 1993 meeting.
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
Supervisor Eddy Nominated Edmund Kielty, regular member and
Mrs. Chris Pickard, alternate member, to serve a one year term
which will expire August 31, 1994.
2. Social Services Advisory Board
This is a new Board replacing the Social Services Board.
Supervisor Johnson nominated Mary Anderson to a four-year term
representing the Hollins Magisterial District. Her term will
expire July 31, 1997.
RECOMMENDATION•
It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the
Board of Supervisors.
Respectfully submitted, Approve
,mod. .J c..~ ~at1
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. .Ho e
Clerk County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Rnh r.. .Tohnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) Kohinke x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Community Corrections Resources Board File
Social Services Advisory Board File
ACTION NO.
A-82493-12.b
ITEM NUMBER
+~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'Sn COMMENTS:
~C
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. has requested a permit to
hold a raffle in Roanoke County on October 9, 1993. This
application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and
he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in
the Clerk's Office.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from
Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. be approved.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED Y:
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Clerk to the Board County Administrato
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) Kohinke x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle Permits File
V
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This
application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules,
ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted
hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned
applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this
permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy
of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and
raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sect. of the
criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et.
seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County
Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to
granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from
the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The
Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization
found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law.
Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or
educational purposes for which the organization is specifically
organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be
guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: (check one)
RAFFLE PERMIT ~ BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization ~~,~~ ,~ ~,a ~~~, ~T~
Street Address _'S-~~ ~ ~.n~ , _, r !/~_..,~.,, ~ /~.cJa ~ ~»',~°
Mailing Address ,~.~..,~~~
City, State, Zip Code ~~--~.,~_.,~~ , `7/~ ~ ~~! ~
Purpo~se~and Type of Organization
When was the organization founded? / l ~ /
1
/~ -3
Roanoke County meeting place?
Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two
continuous years? YES / NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES ~ NO
Federal Identification Number ~~ ""' ~ ~ ~v (0 7 ~a
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President : ~, ~~1~ o ~~
Address : ~~ 7~ ~~P,1 tihc~ K~ -
Secretary: (,t)gnO~G f7~~G!'1 e~
Address: ~ rc~ ~ ~~ ~~'~ ~~
I ~ r~1
~-~~~an r,~ , 11
Vice-President ~~
Address: c~,1,1'~Gd1'? ~a~ic~
~~~n r~~t l/l~-
Treasurer: ~,~~ ~2-u ~~e.e~- I r~~~
Address : J~~~~ SU~Ct ~ ~~t ~c:~,.
Gr-~'~T L°~-~
,Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations:
Name : , ~ -~
Home Address ~ / ~ % i~,~,.~~,-,-, ~,~r~
Phone 'J 7~ - ~ ~/~, ~ ~ Bus Phone - - -
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDREB8E8 OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP
M08T BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing /o - 9 - 93 Time of Drawing ~1: ~~ ,c~,r, .
BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity:
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
i~
2
~,c~`'cS
State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used.
List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use
estimated amounts if necessary.
~~C.~iy(,-d ~~ ,~~R.•J ~y~'liC.~~LZiL J "_ f.i'Iiui~
4%' ~~Y71 - ~~~~-~'a~~.-
~-~G~L.-c~-~~a-~.c,~ ~
3
BINGO: Complete the following:
Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name:
Address:
County
State ZIP
Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?
Seating capacity for each location:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar
year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter 4th Quarter
TOTAL TOTAL
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association,
organization, partnership, or corporation of any classification
whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting
Bingo Games or Raffles? yQS
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such recoqrds are subject to audit
by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Y~eg
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the
Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on
which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to
perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all records
required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? y eS
4
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must
be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the
first day of DECEMBER of each calendar year for which a permit has
been issued? ~.i
6. Does our or anization understand that if gross receipts
Y g
exceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an
additional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter?
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the
permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or
Raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new
permit is obtained? ~ _
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically•
chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingo games or
raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1
of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?
9. Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the
first of December?~~
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application?
G
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such
participation, shall participate in the management, operations, or
conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive
any remuneration for participating in management, operations, or
conduct of any such game or raffle? ~,~r _,~~--
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke?_~
5
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section
18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is
subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder,
agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the
above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony?
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its
membership to this application form? ~,(~~
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form?_~;
16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property
taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues?
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal. roperty, or
both and identify exempt property. .fit, ~
17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization.
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?~
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? ~
(If so, attach copy of registered agent.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by
the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?~
(If so, attach copy of exemption.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF
SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description
~ ~~~ :.~
Fair Market Value
s~~ v ~ . ~
6
~~~ U~
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed by: l~-'~~ ~~+,~J ,~
~~ ~J n ~~l ~' e_ ~-'e~i re/ Jr~a~ ,~ra'~j ~ St,J f5"v~J ~'~~ v~
Name Title Home Address
Subscribed and sworn befo a me, t is ,~~ day of ~~19~,~'
in the County/ of c.e~ , Virginia.
- ~ ~a 1 ~
My commission expires:
;~~ 19-~~
Notary ublic
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. BOX 20409
ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is approved
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year.
~ ~
Date ommis oner of t Revenue
The above application is not approved.
Date Commissioner of the Revenue
9
~ r
t ~~
,..
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION 82493-12.C APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT FOR
LEASE/PURCHASES OF FIRE & RESCUE VEHICLES
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia
("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to
advance money to pay the costs of acquiring certain equipment for
the County consisting of afire truck and related equipment, refuse
vehicles and related equipment and two ambulances ("Equipment") and
to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings .
The Board of Supervisors has determined that Equipment through one
or more lease financing transactions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OS SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of
official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2.
2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse
advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of
acquiring the Equipment from the proceeds of its debt or other
financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected
to be issued for the equipment is $1,500,000.
3. The Board of Supervisors determines that the financing of
the acquisition of the equipment pursuant to one or more agreements
providing for the leasing of the Equipment by the County from one
or more lessors (collectively, the "Lease") is in the best interest
of the County and the lease financing of the Equipment is
authorized. The maximum aggregate amount of the principal
components of the Lease shall be $1,500,000 plus an amount
~ ~
sufficient to pay the costs incurred by the County in connection
with the financing or financings and to fund any required reserves.
The Director of Finance and the County Administrator are authorized
to select a lessor or lessors and to execute and deliver on behalf
of the County an appropriate Lease or Leases and such other
documents, agreements and certificates as may be necessary to
complete the lease financing.
4. The County Administrator, the Director of Finance and
such officers, agents and employees of the County as either of them
may direct are authorized and directed to prepare any and all
instruments, opinions, certificates and other documents necessary
to carry out the purposes of this Equipment and all such action
previously taken is ratified and confirmed.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~r.~.~, ,~. G2~e.-~ e..,K.J
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
ACTION NO.
A-82493-12.c
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 10, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for Lease/Purchases -Fire, Rescue
and Refuse Vehicles
i
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Several fire, rescue and refuse vehicles and their related equipment
were included in the 1992-93 fiscal year budget and the 1993-94 fiscal year budget. Because of the
long delay between the time these vehicles are ordered and when they are actually delivered to the
County, the lease/purchase arrangements are made on these vehicles after they are actually received
by the County. County funds are used to purchase these vehicles and then reimbursed from the
lease/purchase proceeds. Recent changes in tax law require that the Board of Supervisors adopt a
formal reimbursement resolution which declares their intent to reimburse County funds from
lease/purchase proceeds.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The. following items were included for lease/purchase and are in
the process of being purchased and/or leased at the present time.
From the 1992-93 budget:
One fire truck and related equipment $240,000
Refuse vehicles $ 98,000
From the 1993-94 budget:
Two ambulances $130,000
Refuse vehicles and related equipment $1,003,500
The attached reimbursement resolution will formalize the Board's commitment and is a necessary
document in obtaining lease/purchase financing for these vehicles and equipment.
/-~_ ,~
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been included in the current fiscal year for lease/purchase debt
payments on the above vehicles and equipment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached reimbursement resolution for
the lease/purchase item included in the 1992-93 and 1993-94 fiscal year budgets.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
Appr ed by,
. ~ t~
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ~~ Motion by: Bob z. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied () Eddy _ x _
Received () Johnson _ X _
Referred () Kohinke _ x _
To () Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
cc: File
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
~+
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that
it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring certain equipment for
the County consisting of a fire truck and related equipment, refuse vehicles and related equipment
and two ambulances ("Equipment") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more
financings. The Board of Supervisors has determined that Equipment through one or more lease
financing transactions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury
Regulations Section 1.150-2.
2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made
by the County to pay the costs of acquiring the Equipment from the proceeds of its debt or other
financings. The- maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the
Equipment is $1,500,000.
3 The Board of Supervisors determines that the financing of the acquisition of the Equipment
pursuant to one or more agreements providing for the leasing of the Equipment by the County
from one or more lessors (collectively, the "Lease") is in the best interest of the County and the
lease financing of the Equipment is authorized. The maximum aggregate amount of the principal
components of the Lease shall be $1,500,000 plus an amount sufficient to pay the costs incurred
by the County in connection with the financing or financings and to fund any required reserves.
The Director of Finance and the County Administrator are authorized to select a lessor or lessors
and to execute and deliver on behalf of the County an appropriate Lease or Leases and such other
documents, agreements and certificates as may be necessary to complete the lease financing.
4 The County Administrator, the Director of Finance and such officers, agents and employees
of the County as either of them may direct are authorized and directed to prepare any and all
instruments, opinions, certificates and other documents necessary to carry out the purposes of this
Equipment and all such action previously taken is ratified and confirmed.
5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
r
AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF TH8 BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 24, 1994
RESOLIITION 82493-12.d REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
OLNEY ROAD AND CORLLENS LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Olney Road from the
intersection of Mountain View Road (State Route 651) to the cul-de-
sac, for a distance of 0.104 miles and Corllens Lane from the
intersection of Olney Road to the cul-de-sac for a distance of .083
miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of
State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Mountain View Estates
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 144, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on August 16, 1991 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage
easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for streets.
3. That said roads known as Olney Road and Corllens Lane
which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become
a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
t
only from and after notification of official acceptance of said
streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~•
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
~~
NORTH
. -.. 2 - _ . --• -- - ----
' INOU w ,r
~ = 32 JrJ' r ~ ~o w4 ~ d°o X00 /J I 1 p
s ~ o
. ~ ~ ~ J4~ sea a 'z2,i 12 ~ 10
'f~i t , 1- ~\ 0- 0 13 412 g
~.9 34 gray 6 e' s ° 14 ~ T~j° 416
r B °
~ s .t° 35 n°~e ~. I Tr 4 ~ a~ °s
°%, , ~3' ~ 0 498 ~ Y X99 400 40 ,oo
J ~ s g 10o rr~
~/ 2' y ~ t x.91 •7
J~
o , - ~<ay L,OM1d
_ ~ ~ m3 ~
~•o ~ep3
• .~ Ott roe 411
j 37 ~ `6a. „a ~0~
, 4os
r 36 3'
J
~ a ? I 94 x ~ ~
? 'a, 9
~ Nsy3 Op
~ssJ a $ ~~ 1.42 Ae
• ~~~ 90
oa r
i,o Y ,nsa
ss 1.72 Ac o 190 ° $ 498 6 8 ° s
~ 3
.r ;
~ C
T 3
ary.
~ zzl9 °
6~
C ~ ~
a s ro o
B ~ U o ~62.9~
X07
r
a~
c
O ,~ ~o
~~~ ~o
~~a9 ~~ 487
:r 82 ~
~~ ssa
c
4e6 5
°
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY
DESCRIPTION:
1) Olney Road from the intersection o f Mountain View Road (VA
Rte. 651) to the cul- de-sac.
2) Corllens Lane from the intersection of Olney Road to the cul-
de-sac.
LENGTH: (1) 0.104 MILES (2) .083 MILES
RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET (2) 50 FEET
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET (2) 30 FEET
SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 26 FEET (2) 26 FEET
SERVICE: (1) 3 HOMES (2) 3 HOMES
ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF OLNEY ROAD AND CORLLENS
ENGINEERING & LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM
INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
3
6/c%'.
ITEM NUMBER l"'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Olney Road and Corllens Lane into the
Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~~~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
C & M Associates the developers of Mountain View Estates,
requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the
Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept
0.104 miles of Olney Road and .083 miles of Corllens Lane.
The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives
of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find these roads
are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT•
No county funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
VDOT requesting that they accept Olney Road and Corllens into the
Secondary Road System.
TTED BY:
Arnold Covey,~~ Tirec~r
of Engineering & In pections
APPROVED:
EC~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
f-~ 5
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Ref erred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
"'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1994
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
OLNEY ROAD AND CORLLENS LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Olney Road from the
intersection of Mountain View Road (State Route 651) to the cul-de-
sac, for a distance of 0.104 miles and Corllens Lane from the
intersection of Olney Road to the cul-de-sac for a distance of .083
miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of
State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Mountain View Estates
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 144, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on August 16, 1991 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage
easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for streets.
3. That said roads known as Olney Road and Corllens Lane
which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become
4
/-s-.~
a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
only from and after notification of official acceptance of said
streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
5
ACTION NO. A-82493-12.e
ITEM NO. ~~ " t~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees
Grumman Aircraft Company - Firetruck Litigation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~ jk;I~I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' '
The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal
expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc.
over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck.
BACKGROUND:
In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of
Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and
other possible defendants over•the defective ladder on the aerial
fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town.
Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed
that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation.
The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows:
February 11, 1992 $ 1,151.95
March 24, 1992 1,437.59
May 26, 1992 2,363.43
June 23, 1992 1,779.16
September 8, 1992 228.71
September 22, 1992 868.75
October 27, 1992 941.00
December 1, 1992 289.00
December 15, 1992 843.00
February 23, 1993 3,835.00
March 23, 1993 6,648.60
April 4, 1993 480.10
May 25, 1993 1,315.36
June 3, 1993 751.00
Total $22,932.65
1
~'
FISCAL IMPACTS'
$645.92 (July 2, 1993 statement) and $59.38 (July 9, 1993
statement from Grainger/Division of W. W. Grainger, Inc.) in
current fees to be paid from the Potential Litigation Account.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
payment of this invoice from the Board's Potential Litigation
Account.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved (x )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Nickens
Minnix
File
cc: Diane Hyatt
Paul M.Mahoney, County Attorney
c;\wp51 \agenda\general\legal.fee
Vot
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
x
x
2
IB' ~.d .1.~. k.
TOWN OF VINTON ~ ~uL ~ ~ ~~~~~ {
;~
P. 0. BOX 338 ~° '
VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179
PHONE 1703) 983-0608
FAX /7031 983-0621
July 24, 1993
TO: Joe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
POB 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
JOAN B. FURBISH
FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER
STATEMENT
Statement From
Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC
r or Professional Services Rendered
Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company
July 2, 1993 Statement -- $1,291.83
Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton $645.92
Statement From
Grainger
Division of W. W. Grainger, Inc.
For Caliper To Be Used To
Measure Tolerances For Ladder Truck
July 9, 1993 Statement -- $118.75
Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To
Town of Vinton 59.38
DUE UPON RECEIPT $705.30
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
TOWN OF VINTON
cc: Diane D. Hyatt
ACTION NO. A-82493-12.f
ITEM NO. ~'=~7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of donation of a sanitary sewer easement
to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in
connection with the Route 11 Project of the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of a relocated
easement for sanitary sewer purposes in connection with a project
for improvement of Route 11 by the Virginia Department of
Transportation in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of
Roanoke, as follows:
a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, fifteen feet (15')
in width, upon, under, across and over a tract or parcel
of land located along Route 11, from Hollins College
Corporation (Deed Book 213, page 1, and Deed Book 250,
page 303) (Tax Map No. 27.00-1-1), shown as outlined in
PURPLE on plan Sheet 6, State Highway Project 0011-080-
105, RW-202, a copy of which is attached hereto.
County staff has inspected the location and dimensions of
the property and has approved the same.
FISCAL IMPACT•
No county funding is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the easement.
Respectfully submitted,
Vic ie L. f man
Assistant County Attorney
~'
Action
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by Bob L . ,Tohnson
Vote
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Nickens x
Minnix x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
'rPE REO D r:_E' !cE/ 1040 5„ : /
'35. c1 yO CGi5R _ ~ s O / / % / DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUI
TO REGULATION AND CONTROL Of TRAFFK
Df TAJC) ~ ~ ~ ~ `< ° ~ ~~ a ^o SUBJECT TO CHARGE AS DEEMED NECES
q•
+N~,-AJL)L _- PEO'D .' ~~; ~ ~F ? Wlp~ F T}fEDEPAATIAEIfT. ~\\
:v u 1 ,~~
C. PJPE REO'D IN.ET =L r/ a ~ ~ W ~
sa.m ~'d o ~
o ~f• ~ v `~
~.._°! GI-J9 kco D LT : o'„- n' - ~ ~, 2 ~ m i ., : ~ ~ C A ~
Pe'd rS-J SN~iJNG REO G. • 8. ~ / ~ u i o.° m = e~ ~ ~ ~ ± ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~
h .n ~ ~ ? ,~ ~' v
PrP_ RFO~D J,vcET ECEL r0.•r.73 / / ~ y a~'oti!+~o e ` : ; i ^N z > ~• u ~
m T ,: Rape Aram., / / n ~ h ~ • . ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ . ~ ~ y'e ~ t
V D•__ L•G H•/J.59 ~ / / N.. ey^' etc\ ;li t V V ~ V
c 1029~!J 4d J.-J SwAFwg .7E~6.. ~ ~ "'e r< •OD3.\ / ,r ~'~~ ~ ~~ o . ~~ ~ " m
~ ¢L.i c/== ><:'J i~ /NCE! 4 // / \ 4~ ~ rJ./ ,G23.7 \~ ~ ~k ~~~^~•~J'~^^f •~n y'w c~ ~~- 3~ ~ 'n i~
aQ GulLEr ECEV /oL.~.ca~, ,~/• ~ ~: Q Q ~~r•
/ ,_ •1 ~ ~
/
'Nd/r Gr lCti k57'O Rr :/ // ~ _ 'y/r3 74~ ~ ~ ~ \` ~ I
GEi AJCI // ~ / M 11 F, n
Scc7E. / ~ // / / ExTENSrON OF $/Ge7Vq! { \~ 'I ~C % ~ `~ •' ~~ ~~
TO BE CONS:K.tiC i`L 25' ~ J"Lt/Z,gS o~
/i ~ ~ ~./` ~ i 1 ROLL/N~ COLLEGE COROOI~AT/Ot1
///// ~/ h'O!!lN$ CO!CfC'c C?PG, '\~ 1 ~ tZ~ It 7G.2 ~~ 1 PEA'/A;:='.- :'-•.-__ '
1 6_.z E ¢ c : -N,'c~~ O.Bi 2/3 PG./ ~r l
/ ~ ~ . -_=~C ~ l/7.25 Ate. ± L~J
/ , ~ EASrtr!_.aT \ ~ [7%or °i ~ 3 ~ ' ° FfY/AF~4_!v'
~ N
////~ HOLL/NS COLLEGE CORPORAT/ON ~'~6'6' A~,\~~ ,~j~S tt~'9 yj ~ ~ ~ ~~r ~J ~ ~r=7.O"`°;I /~~-^
/ ~ / / D. B. ?SO P6. 303 e ~ . / `i ~ ~2?~ _ _ _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~J 't''-I~~
. / ~ 257. 6 AC. { Ne..• P.op. A/w ?~ /64 _ _~ ~ r- ~.~'~ --.-. - .v-, /o-: e i I'
~ (027 cdou. ti ~. d7al I /-~--~_ -t~-~.,. ~ _y. - --_ c ~
1 x43.53/ .+e:rvev.JS,JSbs/ e ~T _ / ~ C'r•, •li~
iE.Nr'Gk,:ky CONS7YJCiJO -- X ~~I~ V y ~- ~ ~J~--~.~ ?:ryj~~'
=t. tM=h' ` f. 5. F. 22" ~~ _ -- \ I 'i': or ; -J~s'~.c•s~:~ 'Q "_
CONSTRUCT/O,v !rMrTS -~ ~ c ga' ~ r- I 4~ `„ m ~ --%!~-'aft^'
/~ ~ 6-4 ~ ~:o~ ~ .0'39 t •, ..` •s ~ I 6•l9: ~N G"IC :7'Q Sira°
edJ-'=-~ EX/ST A/W~ ~ ~ Pro . R/ ~ ~ y I ~ l._=-~_~' 1t. V t-:=~
~.. _ as _ 1ti~ --~o _l~ -3
----_ •
2x-
1 r 7.
......
s-T
:J.J.:~::::::::
........ ... ..
....::
r.~
"'.4••
#• ;~ _
_ :p.J r;
~~
.~:; --
•y, :I. t _
~;.
...................... ....
1 t
Ti • ~..
...
. ................... ..... ..._..................
;E~
s. t!:
•l~ .2 J. ... ... !1.~•:• l..
~T
.............
_.:_ .:
:LL: 4:~. ::::
_~ iF: .
.~
:~~ I
.r _ _ ~~: -
i
:_`i==
_~ ~ • ML •
- _ :ci
.,-r~r. • •.a.~C•Y •
w a:
_r=
/-
••JJ~~ 29 _
:~;-
.x
:o
: ~ cit• . i
'~:
._..:!1
y.: a•
.~~
ay_ :k
_l
~+
. w. - 1
II :7
gyp: ;tij 1+•c:w
~..
:~:
e~ ~ :~.
. -. - ~r-
,. a~a
:~, . ':a:
r~: -
•/ .i:
~a.•v
..~ •:~
- : ~::
_ __ _ .~. 4
~+i4.Aiti :.
_ - -1 •
... I~
••i /. J.T ^r .. .. ...... .......... _ 5 ~_~-~ - :~.~'.:.:.//I JN~Ii.:ul'...J•Jr.T. •~~,
\_ _
q~- ExisT R/~ --rte - _ .. t~r~ x.. F~ ~,~.E~-,,,~•~~~•~,~~~ , •,
e
• J/
// 7~a ~~ o :_C
:
' St, ,.
:`
^ . ..... ... .......... r
2'S'F.At:~::
_ ~ ~T ;
'7--~,z ..,..-.:~-ate...,. - _- _ ~ .............
_.
C t. h
G-J2
_ _ _ ... ~.
X S Y
d.E
.Ci ION C/Mr ij -- ---_ .. / Sr/ED AS EMC s• I GJ I ~.3 ivJan ,. ~.1.
TEM. r'O %A.RY ~ -o-- ( SLOP-~_'-`y'/"-:•'.:,~ ilk c I'C~
A,Sc,N_r4T ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ I \ J 1'r':::::::::" ~;: .::.
ROLL/NS COLLEGE , COt4P0~A7/ON i ~~ ~ ;;"J € •'`' ~ /_,, V ~°;'~ : I I C ' •\ l~'
D.B. 83/ f~G32/ C 'J 63.74 ~' 7 ~"~i I` C ~ I I ti/1~ /,~..:::..::..:
6.9 Ac. { 4 ~ ~ / L %Z.G~ ' x74' I ~ I ~ 63.73 •~ I I ~J' / J":::'::::'.~ac:::::::~iy~,
_`__'` f LD- d" -- crNC.. ~~ L _,~_ 7_ I ~O] ~ [r x1.871 ( I Ind. /~ ~~~ ~I7J:;:~~•~LL
_~. ?~i5v..v '' 93' 3 I /
1 n
J ` Coto t i'~ N ~ C^~ /t::::::::::-•p::::::" .;~ /
d/~hE.^r!' t i..7 -_ LO!_ GA-.6C (`7~ is h I ~ ~~.:::::::::'
.......... t7~::::::::~ ~
Tcl<FOKd•iY cX: -MEh ° 3. m TEM/oa':r4 / ` \~ 6 I !I ~ ...
.:\...::'~6::::::::::
Fit liR tlaa,zrek ti4 /~ 3C H4? ' r \ '
rCU$t' G/_`TAh _~c rG,Y.r^. -Ei 9' O.eo? /NL ET S/LT Td.~P ~ !` X9.36 W I I ~°X ••~ 6.:::::::' ~
/''=/.•.N- r - .Grp. P oJ^ :'~~,;,T V 1 1' //
C~i /~cEF'.G.v£ CD. TrP'ca/ D,'~_r-, G^r;,l ~ L„.~ -_- ~ t j , I ' 3' ~s ~P~iG,/ % !~!
cri Y E/Sc ENT F.^.c = ~ =.i c~~ N ` ~.~ "-_ iii _c: __ ~ ~Q,i`GG'.:O'' ~t I ~I ' I ~ ~ c~u.~CQ s'~F:/~\/`-~R'.
_ _ ~~ t X
=.?n^-:..^;- _~. e_.._r :•..- 1 2 es-'" ~ if -'' 4.'~Q! / I ~ ~'~ L~ f•ONN L1d/ARRf OR. ~~
- - _ . -.I I r,= ~
~•J' • „vu ~u._ v_ .•_ -•.av- c ~ _ .. _r T _ G = /7 C02't00'RT ~. UI
Jf 7hd ~r,~ CGH'~cc J_</r;, c.~ IC =- ;l a.i. r~c I I I G I ~ -_ - D,.e' t~4.n~
~" ~ fi=t r r :/°7 ?S
TES%ri.J.Z7 _ur Fr,_E :<a.25ro-7~ .~ 29,•?' __ ` _ [r r •'I, ~"~~ ~.~- ~~ 1/r---,Lp~a/6 ea el`1~,
~~ IG.I P_~_Mp,/.I=VT ^FiiER E.A=EMENI FCR ~ C I , I - 1 ~ F ~ v/ /?•3593 a
` _ .. ; ; ~~NDiiE. C..'+vNT`( c _ I :~ ;, i ; a V ~ ~ 07 /3 •a/ 60 i • -•.7
0 Z~ ~ O L , h ~. `J
V ~.•; IIJ CI
ACTION NO. A-82493-12.g
ITEM NO. /~ -S
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer and water line easements
to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in
connection with the T.C.E. Sewer Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~
SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the donation of the
following easements to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer
and water purposes in relation to the T.C.E. Sewer Project in the
Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke:
a) Donation of a sanitary sewer and water line easement,
twenty (20') feet in width, from Raymond B. Huffman and
Hazel H. Huffman, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1004, page
686) (Tax Map No. 27.07-1-4) as shown on a plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated March
20, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto.
b) Donation of a sanitary sewer and water line easement,
twenty (20') feet in width, from Peter L. Williams and
Catherine A. Williams, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1162,
page 18, and Deed Book 1278, page 468) (Tax Map No.
27.11-1-20) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke
County Engineering Department, dated August 5, 1992, a
copy of which is attached hereto.
c) Donation of a sanitary sewer and water line easement,
twenty (20' ) feet in width, from R. D. Peters, also known
as Robert D. Peters, and Margaret F. Peters, husband and
wife, (Deed Book 1348, page 490) (Tax Map No. 27.10-8-1)
as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County
Engineering Department, dated March 20, 1992, a copy of
which is attached hereto.
The location and dimensions of these properties have been
reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff.
/) -~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of these easements.
Respectfully submitted,
V'c ie L. f n
Assistant County Attorney
Action Vote
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy x
Denied ( ) Johnson x
Received ( ) Kohinke x
Referred Nickens x
to Minnix x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
~~
TAX N0. 27.07-1-3
PROPERTY OF \
INTERNAl10NAL
TELEPHONE
TAX N0. 27.06-5-14
PROPERTY OF
DAIRYMEN INC
TAX N0. 27.07-2-2
TAX MAP N0._27.07-1 =4
PROPERTY ODESA~
RAJESH 827.11-1-25
TAX N0.
PROPERTY OF
JOHN H. do CYNTHIA H.
HUFFMAN
TAX N0. 27.07-1-5
91.10'
SCALE:? _?oo'
PLAT SHOWING WATER AND S.S. EASEMENT
BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY
RAYMOND B. & HAZEL H. HUFFMAN
PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 03-2o-s2
_ METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
l'S-~i
~\ 6 20' WATER & S.S.
N6~'~,~ EASEMENT
20~_
PROPERTY OF
~'~. PETER L. WILLIAMS
33.81' ~ ~ TAX N0. 27.11-1-20
~~`~ \ S
X9.
\~ ,e00,
~~
R
S A 'tiL\ RS .~,P~ox w~~ x
PROPERTY OF 9y~, ~~ ~ ''~9• s.a ~ocnna+
HOLLINS MANOR I 00, ~'~,,
TAX N0. 27.11-1-19 F ~~,;`~
A~
6~6\ ~ `
. ~
.~
20' WATER & S.S.
EASEMENT LOCATION
TAX MAP N0. 2711-1 =20
PROPERTY OF
PETER L. WILUAMS
TAX N0.
27.11-1-21
~~
. ~OZ PROPERTY OF
~, HOU_INS MANOR i
,D - ~JO TAX N0.27.11-1-22
PROPERTY OF ~~
HOLLINS MANOR I
TAX NO. 27.11-1-18
PEE. ~
~vLP
SCALE:_1 "= 100'
PLAT SHOWING WATER AND. S.S. EASEMENT
BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY
PETER L. WILLIAMS
PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE:_08-05-92
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
-~''
~ P~ pR
P'
M\~~~
20' WATER & S.S. ~'~
EASEMNT
PROPERTY OF
R.D. PETERS
D.B.1348 PG.00490
PROPERTY OF
GREEN RIDGE BAPTIST CH.
TAX N0. 27.10-8-2
.?~6g
,1y6
PROPERTY OF
STEWART IN-FRA-RED
TAX N0. 27.07-2-3
PROPERTY OF
HOLLINS MANOR I
TAX N0.27.11-1-19
TAX MAP N0._27.10-8-1
SCALE:
PLAT SHOWING WATER AND S.S. EASEMENT
BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY
R. D. PETERS
PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1'=100'
DATE: 03= 20=92
~/" .~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
% of General
Amount Fund Expenditures
Beginning Balance at $4,512,763
July 1, 1993 (Unaudited)
Original
1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve 80,668
Original
1993-94 Budget Previously reserved for
employee benefits and
new administration building (886,182)
July 27, 1993 Reserved for ISTEA match 49 200
Balance at August 24, 1993 3 658 049 4.7%
Submitted By
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the
General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447).
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
July 13, 1993
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 $ 90,464
(Unaudited)
Northside High School Ball Fields 62 000
Balance as of August 24, 1993 $28,464
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
/'~'~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
July 13, 1993
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 $100,000
Clerk of Circuit Court New Position 26 400
Balance as of August 24, 1993 $$ 7_
Submitted by
~ct.~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: August Report on 1991 Water Projects
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will
provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow
Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water
Transmission Line Project.
SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT
The construction of the reservoir is now in its twenty first month
and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the
last month included:
° Completed dental concrete on foundation
° Completed quarry and crushing operation
° Completed RCC dam construction
° Completed concrete and piping placement for river pump station.
The current project contract total costs including existing and
pending change orders is $25,044,000. This cost remains unchanged
from the previous report.
Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir
are $21,393,881.31 and $1,402,740.89 for engineering construction
phase services.
During the next month, the contractor will perform the following:
° Construct the intake tower
° Continue the pump station pump control room construction
° Continue gate house construction.
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
The Water Treatment Plant continues in the design phase. Activity
during the last month included:
° Plans and operational data are currently under review by the
County and State.
~_
/~/
Thy pilot water treatment plant was not operated last month and
remains on standby. The plant will only be operated if the Health
Department requests additional specific operating data or
demonstration of treatment processes.
During the next month, staff
° Work with consultants on
° Work on construction plan
° Work on process equipment
WATER TRANSMISSION LINE
The following work continues
will perform the following:
Process Control/Display System
details for process units
specifications.
on the Water Transmission Line:
° Title certification
° Easement negotiation
° Obtaining easements
° Preparation of construction drawings.
Work will continue on acquisition of easements during the next
month.
SUBMITTED BY:
-_ _ \
l
Cliffor ra'g, P.E.
Utility D ector C
APPROVED:
~~/
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administra or
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Minnix
Johnson
Kohinke
Eddy
Nickens
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER .~=~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: Tuesday, August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
Solid Waste Facilities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Progress is being made on all areas of the project. Placement
of the liner material has begun. Approximately 50% of the liner
material has been crushed and ready for placement.
The rail car dumper is in place and construction of the
building structures has begun.
Erosion and sediment control improvements have been made and
will continue to provide adequate protection to meet field
conditions.
Rail cars and lids should begin arriving in early September
along with the completion of the rail spur.
Transfer site activities continue to shape the final product.
Respectfully submitted:
..._-~
C,,f'
.~" ~~
John R. Hubbard
Chief Executive Officer
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Motion by:_
------------------------------------
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
ACTION NO. ~
ITEM NUMBER / ti' " '~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved
in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the
projected/actual activity of the various work components
(Attachment B).
FISCAL IMPACT'
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Questions may be directed to either the specific project
coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss.
Respectfully submitted, Appr by
r
hn M. Chambliss, Jr'. Elmer C. dge
Assistant County Administrator County Adminis for
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred ( ) Kohinke
To ( ) Minnix
Nickens
~"~
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment A
August 24, 1993
PARKS AND RECREATION
Northside -Engineering work has been completed. The piping contractor has
installed the storm water drainage system, sanitary sewer line and domestic water line
for the property. Grading work is progressing so that the final work may be
completed this fall.
Bonsack Park -The engineering for the development of a baseball field at this
site is being reviewed by the County Development Review process. Construction
activity should begin in the early fall. The school is assisting in obtaining the
appropriate access to this site. Staff met with the community civic league to obtain
input in the play apparatus and picnic shelter scheduled for this site. Various stages
of work will occur during this summer.
Walrond Park -Branch Highways has completed the removal of dirt from the
development site and the final engineering is being completed. Final construction
should occur during the Fall of 1993.
Li htin -Bids were opened on June 11 for the lighting of the five sports
complexes in Roanoke County. The bid has been awarded for the lighting of the three
soccer fields at Vinyard Park which is scheduled to be completed for the Fall 1993
season. The remainder of the bids for Starkey Park, Career Center Field, William Byrd
Baseball Field and Garst Mill Park will be awarded in early August.
Vinyard Park -Engineering services for the baseball fields and improvements at
Whispering Pines Park have been awarded and are due for review by September.
Tennis Court Renovations -The consultant has completed the study and
prepared the specifications to allow the repairs to the various facilities. Bids for the
renovation will be received in August to allow repairs to begin in the summer/fall of
1993.
Ball Field Fencing - Technical specifications have been prepared and the
inventory of fencing needs has been established. Bids are being taken to repair fences
and to establish the fencing cost for new ball fields.
Repairs at Craig Center -Handicap access and installation of a new HVAC
system is continuing.
Groundcover for Playaround Eauigment -This is being evaluated and the
quantities and inventory are being determined. This project will be bid during
August/September so that construction and installation may occur during the fall of
1993.
~~ ~~
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 7,500,000 $ 14,444.20
PROJECT COORDINATOR: SPENCER WTTS ACCOUNT CODE: 104030
COMMENTS:
Schematic design phase is nearly completed; furnishing and book capacity needs have been reconciled with spatial
allocations. Preliminary advanced design work has started. Initial site plan has been completed, and preliminary
consultations with Planning Department and VDOT have been conducted. Working copies of interior and exterior elevations have
been produced; perspective drawings of the projected exterior will be available in August. Exterior and interior finish
samples will be provided for initial review in August, with adoption of interior decorative concepts and finish selections
to follow in September of early October. A plan for current furnishings' utilization and placement is under development and
should be completed in August or September. Consultation with General Services and Johnson Controls concerning current NVAC
system, and planning for upgrading/expansion/replacement of the system has been initiated. The architect has recommended
that the proposed bid schedule be altered to allow for improved planning and bidding. In conjunction with this, and in order
to take advantage of better weather patterns, construction would be scheduled to start early in the new calendar year.
Initial phases of construction will be scheduled to begin as soon as weather permits in early 1994, with completion scheduled
for December 1, 1994.
1
'V '~
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
BUDGET
S 2,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON
ACCOUNT CODE: 104040
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
RFP PLANNED
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
ACTUAL
SELECT PLANNED
CONSULTANT
ACTUAL
_»>>`
~~~>>~~>
PRELIMINARY PLANNED
ENGINEERING
ACTUAL
PREPARE PLANNED
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
ACTUAL
ADVERTISE PLANNED
FOR BIDS
ACTUAL
AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED
ACTUAL
CONSTRUCTION PLANNED
ACTUAL
SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED
COMPLETION
ACTUAL
PROJECT PLANNED
CLOSEOUT
ACTUAL
TOTAL PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
Request for proposals for engineering services are being reviewed by the Selection Committee.
DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT
CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
2
~~- (p
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
8 90,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
II DESIGN PLANNED
ACTUAL
MEET WITH PLANNED
CITIZENS
ACTUAL
BID, PRE-BID PLANNED
CONFERENCE
ACTUAL
AWARD PLANNED
CONTRACT
ACTUAL
CONSTRUCTION PLANNED
TOTAL PLANNED
PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
1. No easements needed.
2. Coordinate with VDOT (95% Project in VDOT RW)
3
-° ~,.,
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 75,000 S 97,500
PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCN 110Rg1AN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050
COMMENTS:
1. No permanent easements needed.
II
h 5. Phase I
Draina
e - 57,500 from F &
Budget; Phase II - W & $15, 000 from
000 from Bond
575
2.
3 Phase I Murray
Phase fI Trunk )
ase
Run below F & W Bldg. F (Upstream from P
line along Colony Ln. & drainage easement 6. g
P-120 to be constructed wi ,
th Phase II
.
4. Discuss curb 8 gutter option w/VDOT along portion of Colony ln. 7. Phase I to be constructed under hourly rate
contract .
Phase I is complete and approximately 522,000 was spent. Also P-120 has been completed.
4
/V-~
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
DRAINAGE PROJECTS -NOTTINGHAM HILLS AREA
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
$ 45,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
PRELIMINARY PLANNED
ENGINEERING
(FIELD) ACTUAL
MEET WITH PLANNED
CITIZENS
ACTUAL
HOURLY PLANNED
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT ACTUAL
TOTAL PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
1. No permanent easements needed
2. To be in conjunction with P-103
3. Projects are in three (3) locations - Cave Spring Ln., Cynthia Dr., & Farmington Dr.
5
~---
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 300,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104050
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
APPLY FOR PLANNED
FEMA GRANT OF
MATCHING FUNDS
ACTUAL
RFP PLANNED
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
ACTUAL
SELECT PLANNED
CONSULTANT
ACTUAL
PRELIMINARY PLANNED
ENGINEERING
ACTUAL
PREPARE PLANNED
WATERSHED
PLANS
ACTUAL
REGIONAL PLANNED
POLICY
ACTUAL
REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED
INVESTIGATION
ACTUAL
REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED
CONSTRUCTION
ACTUAL
TOTAL PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
unt is awaitin notification from FEMA on approval of matching monies.
The Co y 9
6
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 1,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104209, 104201, 104203
104204
1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
TASK
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
ALROND PARK
LANNED
1 000
<
:;Ei~tG'.
............
E.FEfi::
.............
::::BID::::;:
::EffN`i :
>3' pW:.
:::.......... >''~'fa
". CO .
............
SOCCER FIELD ~> ~>~
:EKlO'
€'
€
:::' <~ <::
COH''
'
'
ACTUAL .
.
. .
•
ALROND PARK
LANNED
2,000
:
::>::> ::>::>::>::
~N~a
::»::>::>::>:«::
tNG
:::>::»::;:.>:.;:.
H#~3
:.;;:.;:.:;.;:.:
:GO.; :..
~>
::.......... :>::~>
.Cii
.............
2 BASEBALL >:~:~>:< ::>=~`.::~>
FIELDS ACTUAL ?>ET~IG::: >#E6i1N:>.>.
NORTHSIDE PLANNED 52 000 GON E[lN '~~ELiN
REALIGN FIELDS »:::~>::> >:~:~»«:> >:~:>::>
ACTUAL 8 898 LNG>:: :':'_EI~G» :>`:G~#N::
BONSACK PARK
PLANNED
20 000 .........
::GBN: ... .
`::~~N.€;€€;
»€GOfi:
BALL FIELD
ACTUAL `<~iwG« ~~#G#€> ~~tG< <`:E~fG`":
BONSACK PARK PLANNED 15 000 'Ef7N €fCii~N[ >i1~t'
PICNIC SHELTER >::>:~> »:>:»::> ~>
ACTUAL ENG`:€:: :::E%EG:: :::BaA:
BONSACK PARK PLANNED 10 000 G~61' `EElld l~E>
PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT ACTUAL
VINYARD PARK I
PLANNED
62 000
~ENG::
::B.:I:O:::
:EON::
::::GDN.: . `CQN'`
............
2 BASEBALL "'>` '>
FIELDS ACTUAL ~:>~~~
VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150 000 ':.>:EDW%> ''`GON: ::€:f]SE'f
LIGHT SOCCER
::.
''''`:>: : 3`
FIELD ACTUAL 8 413 >:.:arkG:' ::;:.6:17.:: .::a1,ID.: :::,CON,!; ;
TOTAL PLANNED 402,000
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
Northside - Engineering work has been completed. The piping contractor has installed the storm water drainage system,
sanitary sewer line and domestic water line for the property. Grading work is progressing so that the final work may be
completed this fall.
eonsack Park - The engineering for the development of a baseball field at this site is being reviewed by the County
Development Review process. Construction activity should begin in the early fall. The school is assisting in obtaining the
appropriate access to this site. Staff met with the community civic league to obtain input in the play apparatus and picnic
shelter scheduled for this site. Various stages of work will occur during this summer.
Walrond Park -Branch Highways has completed the removal of dirt from the development site and the final engineering is being
completed. Final construction should occur during the fall of 1993.
7
,may'°` '~
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
BUDGET
S 1,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS
ACCOUNT CODE: 104204, 104210, 104212
104205, 104207
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25 000 ENG:>: ::::ENG::: ::::B.:IA::: ::::GQN:::::: .::E........
PARKING
ACTUAL
VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25,000 rri~~; #3;~0 ::;ESN.:::::; ?:€EQH;€: : .............
RESTROOM UTIL
ACTUAL `>:ENG:'.>:
............
.............
...
VINYARD PARK I
PLANNED
50 000
:E.l~G::
;:::ENG:::
?:B:tD::
:::::GDN:::: EIN~>
.::E.......
LIGHT BASEBALL
ACTUAL
VINYARD PARK I
PLANNED
25 000
:EAfG
::~t~~a::
>::6tU::~:
::
::EON:: :' ~j#:°
CO ...
,::..........
CONCESSION/
STORAGE ACTUAL
MT. PLEASANT PLANNED 40 000 >.C:NG[::>: .::EN;G; :;:13`a1ti
PARK BALL
FIELD ACTUAL
STONEBRIDGE PK PLANNED 25 000
>::E#EG::
::E.tfG::
::6iD::
:`£lIN2:
'' N>
:~>:..........
RESTROOM UTIL.
ACTUAL
BYRD SCHOOL PLANNED 60, 000 z'GOH EiSN'> f11SE
LIGNT BASEBALL
FIELD ACTUAL <`:~l+lG>'. '':sIDs ?8#> `'.13`:i~<<
WHISPERING PLANNED 31, 000 :<:'~kG;> :B;Ti: ;>EiSN;#: EON : ! CtSN
PINES PK. -
BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL 632 f:ENG> _
TOTAL PLANNED 281 000
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
Lighting -Bids were opened on June 11 for the lighting of five sports complexes in Roanoke County. The bid has been awarded
for the lighting of the three soccer fields at Vinyard Park which is scheduled to be completed for the Fall 1993 season.
The remainder of the bids for Starkey Park, Career Center Fietd, William Byrd Baseball Field and Garst Mill Park will be
awarded in early August.
Vinyard Park -Engineering services for the baseball fields and improvements at Whispering Pines Park have been awarded and
are due for review by September.
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
8
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 1,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR• JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104207, 104211, 104206,
• 104213, 104202
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
NHISPERING
PLANNED
60 000
" 8~0"'
~'E~~~'
'~'if3<::<
:»:Gi~N.'. >~OK<
....
PINES - LIGHT
BALLFIELD ACTUAL
WHISPERING
PLANNED
25 000
1~EG::
:::8_TD~~>
G4~~
GON:::: s
...G..N...
PINES -
....:::
RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL :::ENG::::
WHISPERING
PLANNED
36 000
'`£t~G€'.
'.'.BiD'.#':
'.'.'COH:
`''GON'... >::`W .
C0...
... .
..
PINES -TENNIS/ >>
BASKETBALL CT ACTUAL i<.#:NG:.`
GREEN HILL PK
PLANNED
30 000 <
s;.ENG:.. zE1~G>
... >>~ i# < '. SON:>.
i~N:::
...C
2 PICNIC "' ~'':
SHELTERS ACTUAL
............
............. :.$TO::
GARST MILL PK
PLANNED
124 000
€~i~G
l~l5 >::>s::>::>
GON:: >::>:>:>:>:
:G!~.:; .:.
............
LIGHT 2 BALL
FIELDS ACTUAL <~1~G`: ?~&I~ «BIQ <si~:`?.
41INDSOR HILLS PLANNED 50 000
AREA PURCHASE
LAND ACTUAL
NINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62 000 'EHG:' :::;:;:EEG:::::: ::::>8'D:
AREA - 2 BALL
FIELDS ACTUAL
STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62 000 :::::SON''' ' 'z`Y7~E::~s
2 BASEBALL
FIELDS ACTUAL 22,656 ,::USE;:
TOTAL PLANNED 449 000
ACTUAL 12,829
COMMENTS:
Starkey Park -The baseball field has been constructed, the piping installed to improve drainage in the middle of the park,
and the soccer field re-oriented to provide two soccer fields at this site. Future work will include correcting erosion
problems along the creek to preserve our investment in this park and providing utilities for future restroom facilities.
9
t'
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
BUDGET
S 1,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS
ACCOUNT CODE: 104202, 104214, 104218,
104220, 104219
STARKEY PARK PLANNED 25 000 <rxt~::: ::::~nt~::::; :z:::a:us,;: :::;zsvn::;:: ::+.tiA;:;:
RESTROOM UTIL
ACTUAL
TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210 400 ::.B:~D::;.: ?:GQN< :~GON:::>:
Et~G'~
RENOVATIONS
............
.......
ACTUAL 1, 000 ::>~>3G'.::: ::>EFEG::::: ::::::ENG::: ?:1<1~G::>:
BALL FIELD PLANNED 62,000 ~Oti`' lNfr:: ::>t~.ifl::
FENCING >::>::::: :~>::<:..>
•
ACTUAL ':~i~G~~ <$:1
D>
FACILITY
PLANNED
41 000 ;::;:.;.
:;ErNG ::x;::»»
"~#~G...
,.~.LLfi,;;
.CON ;:
! COM{
REPAIRS >;>:?s>.: : »>::
::
CRAIG AVENUE ACTUAL 7 745 !>1i~G<.# "af."..:
FACILITY PLANNED 11 000 ;:;£FEG:[:; :::~1~E': ::B;ID:: :EEDN:;.: _...
REPAIRS " ' ">
LEISURE ARTS ACTUAL
:~;;: ?:lli~:::?
;::•:::~;:~;
:::::::::
FACILITY
PLANNED
4 500
;•::~::~;:~::o:•;
ENCr:::
:~;:~;;;:~;:
:..1~G:::
::
::>B:D"::
.
:
:::G?ON .:.:.
.::..........
G£!N>
AIRS
REP
WALROND OFC.
CTUAL
115
:;::Ct~N:>:
;:.t1~~~:;:.
.::~;::;;;
:;:~ :.:::::
:...........
...........
...........
...
>..
. .
TOTAL PLANNED 446 900
ACTUAL 2,115
COMMENTS:
Tennis Court Renovations -The consultant has completed the study and prepared the specifications to allow the repairs to
the various facilities. Bids for the renovation will be received in August to allow repairs to begin in the summer/fall of
1993.
Ball Field Fencing -Technical specifications have been prepared and the inventory of fencing needs has been established.
Bids are being taken to repair fences and to establish the fencing cost for new ball fields.
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
10
/~/- to
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 1,750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104221, 104216, 104217, 104208
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
:>:s:>::~>:~>::>:>:~> :>::>: »»>:~»»» :>:>:>:>:~:;>:
<::;~ :"
ADA ACCESS PLANNED 15 100 ::::~NG::::::::B:i~1 ::'::: GON:: ::OON:::...G..N...
ACTUAL
GROUND COVER PLANNED 42 000 '' ' ' ' °' - ' - ">
FOR PLAY- <::>::>:z:>:::
GROUND EDUIP. ACTUAL ;.1NG::
INFIELD SURF.
PLANNED
54,000
EElN
EEG
BIp
Gi3H>:
:: ~ ......:. Gt1N
::.::::::::::
S FOR
MATERIAL
BASEBALL <>:»:< ':':'
FIELDS ACTUAL 5,100 GL)N ':~~D+>
CAREER CENTER
PLANNED
60 000 ............
'~1~0~
REPLACE L[GHTS
ACTUAL <`~~fG?< ><RaiJ<> > 6'i#< `BIZ1:`:?>
TOTAL PLANNED 171 000
ACTUAL 5,100
COMMENTS:
Repairs at Craig Center -handicap access and installation of a new HVAC system. Repairs should begin in July.
Handicap Access to Walrond Office Building (Cabin) -Repairs have been completed.
11
f"
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
BUDGET
S 500,000
E 1,000,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: ARNOLD COVET
S 500,000.00
ACCOUNT CODE: 104070
COMMENTS:
Adams Construction Company is to start Plant mix projects July 12, 1993.
Incidental projects - VDOT is actively pursuing right of way.
Because of a delay in obtaining the right of ways for projects, the actual construction may not begin until Spring,
1994.
Beside the heading, VDOT AWARDS CONTRACT ON ALL PROJECTS (57), the shaded area is only for incidental projects. Also
beside the heading, ALL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED & COMPLETED, the shaded area under March and April, 1994, is for incidental
projects only.
ROAD PROJECTS
CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
12
~" Y `~Q
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
BUDGET
S 750,000
PROJECT COORDINATOR: TIM GUBALA
VALLEY TECHPARK
CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
ACCOUNT CODE:
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
I MASTER PLAN
ACTUAL
LAND
ACQUISITION/
EXCHANGE PLANNED
ACTUAL
DETAIL PLANNED
ENGINEERING
ACTUAL
INDUSTRIAL PLANNED
ACCESS REQUEST
ACTUAL
CONSTRUCTION PLANNED
BIDS
ACTUAL
START ROAD PLANNED
,
UTILITY
CONSTRUCTION
ACTUAL
TOTAL PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
The Preliminary Engineering Report was completed in June.
The Industrial Access request to VDOT was approved in June.
The construction plans and preliminary quantities were submitted to VDOT on July 1, 1993.
The VDOT Industrial Access Office in Richmond has forwarded the county/state government agreement to the Attorney
General's Office for review.
The local VDOT office anticipates bidding this project in August/September.
Mrs. Helen Cox-Richards has agreed to sell the County/IDA a .48 acre tract for 510,000. This acreage along with the
property owned by Mr. Edward Bruce Hill is needed for the industrial access entrance. Mr. Hill's attorney, Jim Buchholtz,
is in the process of obtaining approval of our project from SPCA per Mr. Hill's request.
13
/1/~!
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
FIRE HYDRANTS
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 184,000 To be awarded the end of November None until August
PROJECT COORDINATOR: RON EDWARDS ACCOUNT CODE:
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
PREPARE SITE PLANNED
LOCATION MAPS
ACTUAL
PREPARE PLANNED
SPECIFICATIONS
FOR FIRE ACTUAL
HYRDRANTS
BID FIRE PLANNED
HYRDRANTS
ACTUAL
BID PLANNED
INSTALLATION
OF HYDRANTS ACTUAL
INSTALLATION PLANNED
ACTUAL
FINAL INSP., PLANNED
ACCEPTANCE &
PROJECT ACTUAL
COMPLETION
TOTAL PLANNED
ACTUAL
COMMENTS:
The hydrant bid has been received and contract awarded to Ferguson Enterprises. The installation was awarded to
J. P. Turner and work is expected to begin within a few weeks. If everything proceeds as scheduled, this project should be
completed by the end of December, 1993.
14
BOND PROJECT UPDATE
Attachment B
August 24, 1993
PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL
BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE
S 750,000 S 240,121.01
PROJECT COORDINATORS: JOHN CHAMBLISS AND HOMER DUFF ACCOUNT CODE: 155140
' ...
TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4
BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
PURCHASE OF PLANNED 750 000
LAND
ACTUAL
240 121
TOTAL PLANNED 750 000
ACTUAL 240,121
COMMENTS:
The first of several tracts of land to be purchased for the eventual building of a new Cave Spring High School has
been completed. The site is located immediately in front of Penn Forest Elementary School and across from Starkey Park.
Although there are no immediate plans to construct the school, the land wilt be preserved for the eventual development and
will be used for Parks and Recreational purposes until that time. The acquisition cost including testing for the 28 acres
tract was 5240,121.01. Staff has met with other property owners concerning the remaining tracts of land.
15
.'
,.
ITEM NUMBER / ' ~ /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: Local Disaster Relief Effort for Midwest Flood
Victims
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: Over the past several months Midwestern states have
received record rainfalls. This has caused severe flooding along
many major rivers. The flooding has destroyed billions of dollars
in property and placed a financial strain on local governments as
well as companies and individuals.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the July 27, 1993, meeting of the Board,
staff was directed to work with other valley jurisdictions to see
what type of assistance could be provided.
Roanoke County Emergency Services staff working with their
counterparts from Roanoke City, Salem and the Town of Vinton
decided to offer technical assistance for areas requiring disaster
management personnel. This decision was reached after consulting
with the Virginia Department of Emergency Services. A call was
placed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) in
Washington, D.C. Since FEMA acts as a clearing house for disaster
assistance during a national disaster they were provided with
contact information and assistance offered. It then becomes FEMA's
responsibility to match up need requests with available assistance.
In addition, calls have been placed to State Emergency Services
Offices in Illinois and Missouri offering assistance as well as
local Emergency Services Coordinators in several Midwest
cities/counties.
As of this date no request have been received and our assistance
offer is still in effect.
SUBMITTED BY:
.~C ~~
T. C. Fuqua
Fire Chief
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodg J .
County Administr or
~ ~
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by:
~`y r '~
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Eddy
Johnson
Kohinke
Minnix
Nickens
Page i of 2
AcrION No.
ITEM NUMBER ~ ' Q ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 1993.
COUNTY ADMINISTRA'TOR'S QpMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE:
CE~T1'RAL FIDELITY 1,995,018.06
DOMINION 998,402.78
WHEAT 1ST 998,525.00
scary & sTI2INGFELLOW 1,995,463.00
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSI'T'S
SO[1THWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & THAN 100,000.00
CENTRAL FIDELITY 2,000,000.00
CONINiERICAL PAPER:
CRAIGIE 1,995,208.34
DOMINION 997,615.56
NATIONS 997,666.67
SHEARSON 997,559.17
SIGNET 1,996,218.89
WHEAT 1ST 997,916.67
FEDERAL CREDIT:
NATIONS 997,533.00
T.~OCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL:
NATIONS BANtC s,oao,oo6.60
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT:
CENTRAL FIDELI'T`Y 802,952.08
FIRST VIRGINIA 6,274,000.OU
SIGNET 151,642.24
SAVINGS:
NATIONS 918,580.14
DOMINION 4,978.57
~p,~, 33,299,286.77
Page 2 or" 2
+ ACTION NO. _
ITEM NUMBER ~ ~"'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUN`T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA I'T'EMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of May 3I, 1993.
STAFF ATION:
tf 1 ub ed Approved by:
r
Alfred C. Anderson Elmer C. Hodge
County Treasurer County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Notion by: ~ Yes Abs
Denied ( ) ~dy - - -
Received ( ) Johnson - - -
Reerred ( ) Kohnike - - _
To ( ) Minnix - - -
Nickens
PAGE 1 OF 2
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~ 6
AT A REGULAR NIEE`rING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of June 3U, 1993.
COUNTY ADMINIST'RATOR'S COMMEN`rS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE:
CENTRAL FIDELITY 997,761.11
FIRST UNION 997,575.28
SCOTT & STRINGFELIAW 997,705.56
SHEARSON 99$,545.56
SIGNET 997,612.22
WHEAT 1ST 997,543.06
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS:
SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & UJAN 100,000.00
CONA9ERICAL PAPER:
CRAIGIE 2,992,877.78
FIRST UNION 997,567.22
NATIONS 997,391.60
SIGNET 1,995,127.78
FEDERAL CRIDIT:
NATIONS 1,996,177.22
SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW 997,500.00
LOCAL Gov "r INVESTMENT Pool:
NATIONS BANK 2,020,130.64
REPURCHASE P.~xREEMENT :
CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,809,455.59
FIRST VIRGINIA 2,420,000.00
NATIONS 1,000,000.00
SIGNET 1,107,216.29
SAVINGS:
NATIONS 1,185,529.92
DOMINION 10,563.50
---------------
,~~ 25,616,280.33
Page 2 of 2
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER nI - ! U
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE .ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEl~1TER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of June 30, 1993.
STAFF DAT'ION
Rem 1 't by s Approved by:
_ ~O
Alfred C. Anderson Elmer C. Hodge
County Treasurer County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( )Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) _ ~dY - - -
Received ( ) Johnson - - -
Referred ( ) Kohnike - - -
To ( ) Minnix - - -
Nickens
PAGE 1 OF 2
ACTION N0. _
ITEM L~NMBER~ L.'.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31, 1993.
COU[~I'Y ADMINISTRATOR' S COMNiEDPI'S
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE:
CENTRAL FIDELI'T'Y 498,747.36
FIRST UNION 997,697.78
SHEARSON 997,458.33
WHEAT 1ST 798,466.67
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS:
CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,000,000.00
FIRS'T' UNION 1, 000, 000 . UO
SIGNET 250,000.00
SOU'T'HWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & IIJAN 100,000.00
COMMERICAL PAPER:
CRAIGIE 997,666.67
NATIONS 1,995,240.00
SCOTP & S'I'RINGFELI,OW 997,466.67
SHEARSON 997,797.22
SIGNET 1,995,278.89
FEDERAL CREDIT:
NATIONS 997,475.00
SCOTT & STRINGFELL~(.)W 997,607.50
LOCAL GOV' T INVES'i'N1ENT POOL
NATIONS BANK 2,031,414.03
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT:
CENTRAL FIDELITY 2,715,116.42
FIRST VIRGINIA 10,938,000.00
SIGNET 82,669.49
SAVINGS:
NATIONS 1,188,284.24
DOMINION 5,100.89
~p,T, 31,581,4$7.16
Page 2 of 2
ACTION N0.
I'PEM NUMBER ~ -~ '~'
AT A RDGULAR MEETING Or, Thy BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1993
AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the T.reasurer's Accountability per
Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31, 1993.
STAFF DAYTON: ~,
R~ 4~~~Sub~,Ld' b~,;~' Approved by:
y .'" y
Al eci C. Anderson Elmer C. Hodge
Co ty Treasurer County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) l~iotion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy - - -
Received ( ) Johnson - - -
Referred ( ) Kohniice - _
To ( ) Minnix - - -
Nickens
~,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
RESOLUTION 82493-13 CERTIFYING E%ECIITIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the
Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session
M
-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993
ORDINANCE 82493-14 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT MELROSE BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES TO
OPERATE AN AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE PROGRAM
LOCATED AT 3520 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAB PARCEL
37.10-1-22), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Trustees of Melrose Baptist Church have filed a
petition to allow the operation of an after school day care program
located at 3520 Peters Creek Road in the Catawba Magisterial
District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on August 3, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
held a first reading on this matter on July 27, 1993; the second
reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 24,
1993.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use
permit to allow the operation of an after school day care program
located at 3520 Peters Creek Road in the Catawba Magisterial
District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre-
hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the
Trustees of Melrose Baptist Church to allow the operation of an
1
~~
r
after school day care program located at 3520 Peters Creek Road in
the Catawba Magisterial District.
On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
y.
~"`~AiCES~ yd ~9 `~~~`}
R PooL~ ~ N~ ~~ H ~ RECD I
~, ~Q OUDAY
„ O,C a M1' Op SUpp~~R yyy
91JO7Q ~
NAFF'lE H. ~~~
1c~ ,y !175,44
. o K ~,~ ~ti COUNTI' ~ 07~ ', Z
~~ 9G 5 EY CESO ;: 9/a \,p
RO "''
1 n UR ~~7 ° 'P 'P
0 0 ~.
~"!' 1 ~ ~ ~ WY)C
~~
PLA pp
Gy ~ yJ7 St' ,._~~`~ yr y '~' ~ ~• -----
t^ slfoaA.--~ IRO !7~
1 __ _ \`£"T VICINITY MAP ,-~ ,~
~ -1
Q
NORTH
e' 4 C~ . _ ' w t\\
s ~ e
~,! °'a Is q's 9
0
fy° ~ ; ,6
3 t a, fir 17 q,
5~~ 2 .d'
f
3 Qf ie i
ar d
~~` ~,
f i • 1 19 " y
r .° ° ~ yty tp ~,~
a ,+ ~ q
7 ~ 25.1
a ~a 20 ---
p~.~p •~ 21 a ~o
p
~~
a .,
9 0~ 24 s --
t!K `6
+ raP
q
~ ~a 2A 2
i 3 13 D - uoK \
J ~ J,1 19.
~ i4 r 12 ~ \ ~-
,y µ ~ a 1 ~ p
~°rI r ° IS 6
~ '~
P ~ '1 p 1
' r ~$ ~ ~ 4.71 K
>o
..~
31 ~,f ~ ~p1'~ a
°4 P t'
p ~ >s 3
21 ° \
4.4tK ~~
e°,,,y ~4oer eoea or 4Ys~e4. a. '
\ 12
2 1 1f7K
°e
J f \
£usr wrw,•• yr
W/4oe•r C.-reJ
a 791K
21.1
2.xeK ~ ,q
a.,.+.n'...rf• rny..a
1Mt,Lrn RponrLOra+ec'/ 'f? 2 , Or
Rr•.aK+Lae O .
C 1 ~~~
21.2
3T2•c
we es.
y
1e fff
~ 2B 9 -
.
1•• 100
~
X17 0
2T
Or
+ J
2
O
WAVw /W
ly 3J °
'
t yooK101
26 ~ ' Q
f O.eeKiU
•
f µ 1Me
,.+•f ices ~
°
3 ~
~ 1
° ~
t a
lifr _ ~
' L7
i 100K
s
° ~ a IS fsf ",~ +
file
24
•fe7 r ~ Y ~ •~
9;1
~o
1
1.77 K
,
23 - ~ A 6
~
rfrf
I . I6
+ i
Y J p
f
M r a r 1ftt
S 4ftf O \\~
22 ' 7 a
u 7
r
e
f
~ j1r7 1 II e6
S c+
st Pod Erw.w
fyr w Q`~~ /
17 LN4•r•°
u t 2: • . if14 14f1s a.ww,o.
~,r.,..
wig 4f°~.+ f : 3$ 4fj1 lief 3 ~
,r 20 y - p , t
C yr + ~ D W °
4? a °: • ' q .fry ><y
f . .fA o
43 f.f ..,, ~ ~i ~~
i ~ ' e :f74 '~a L
~~• J' u•e 4f ~ P~
7°rM 15 ~ ti K y G`bt~}'
1 ,..+'
a4" + DEPARTI~NT OF PLANNIl\TG ~T/TI~I~IE~ ~ NI~~1PO5~ $~t~77ST Cf/URCfI
r, - ~ AND ZONING ~X MAP /ls/UM18F.R: 3'jr l0 ~ / ` 22
.>, i . ~~Q/~EsT~ s~i~ trse - I~aY CASE cE~V7cR.
.~
I.~r
~._.
PETITIONER: MELROSE BAPTIST CHURCH
CASE NUMBER: 21-8/93
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 1993
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 24, 1993
A. REQUEST
Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees for a Special Use Permit to operate an after
school day care program, located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION
The Commission inquired about an all day program operating at the site and the location of
the nearest traffic light. Staff replied that the petitioner could operate an all day program
without having to appear again before the Commission, and the nearest traffic light is at
North Lake Drive. The Commission asked if the program is only for the school year. Lynette
Martin said that at the present time, the program is only for the school year. She said at
some future time, they hope to expand to other programs.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
None.
E. COMMISSION ACTION(S)
Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Hooker, Massey, Thomason, Robinson, Witt
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map
_ Staff Report _ Other
Terrance Harrington, Secre
Roanoke County Planning Commission
~ -l
STAFF REPORT
PART I
A. IXECUTNE SUMMARY
B. DESCRIPTION
This is a request of Melrose Baptist Church to acquire a Special Use Permit in order
to conduct an after-school day care center in an existing church. The 19.1 acre site
is located at 3520 Peters Creek Road approximately .1 mile west of the County's
Public Safety Center. Day care activities for as many as 40 children (pending Virginia
Department of Social Services' [VDSS] approval) will be conducted from the
southwest wing of the recently expanded church.
C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The subject site is zoned R-2. This zoning district allows churches by right, but
permits day care centers only by Special Use Permit. Day care centers are also
permitted by right in the AV, NC, C-1, C-2, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts. In addition to
R-2, the AR, R-3 and R-4 districts require Special Use Permits to operate a day care
center.
Use and design standards for this civic use type include licensing from the VDSS to
operate a day care center according to established minimum standards followed by
the approval of a certificate of zoning compliance. All required state and local
licenses must be obtained prior to opening the center. The petitioner has applied for
and will undergo on-site inspection by the state for licensing a 40-child day care
center.
::.:. ;. wI.tI3:>::~~tIS:;.:..T.:O.::...:S~E>:.S.,~QUIU.~?~3.;;~[~at:~s~~aau...>~;:.;
:.; . ~i hl~br~n rD . er:.f~~s.::an:;assta~0::.;:.::::.:::.: :.::::.:::.:::.::.:~.:;:.:::p~;<.:;:<:::.:::,.....: :.. ,.::. ,:......:.::....:..:......
~~.:~ :.~:::::::.:::.;;;;:.;:;~.:;t~.::::.:I? ..::::::::::.~::::::.~:::.::::::........
°'
PART II
A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDfT1ONS
Location: The site is located on Peters Creek Road approximately 350 feet
northeast of its intersection with Northridge Lane in the Peters Creek
Community Planning Area. Urban services are available.
TopographyNegetation: The site is predominantly grassed and slopes gently
southwest toward Peters Creek Road. Several old growth hemlocks, oaks and
maples dot the central portion of the 19 acre tract.
Existing Physical Development: Although mostly undeveloped, the site contains
an approximate 30,000 square foot, one-story brick building and associated
parking for 165 vehicles. --
Surrounding Neighborhood: The petitioner's site and County school properties
to the north are zoned R-2. C-1 zoned tracts containing the County Public
Safety building and the future state forensics complex lie to the east. Across
Northridge Lane to the west are R-1 and C-2 zoned residences and south
bordering Peters Creek Road lies the Roanoke City corporate limits.
B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Site Layout/Center Operations: The petitioner proposes to operate from one
1,200 square foot room at the southwesternmost tip of the existing building.
A maximum of 40 children, ages 5-12, would be supervised by two to four
adults from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, during the school year.
Access/Traffic Generation: The existing entrance and parking areas
immediately south and west of the building are adequate to sustain an
anticipated additional 100-120 vehicle trip ends per day. Peak load is expected
to be around 6 p.m. when approximately 40 vehicles will access the parking
areas. The 1986 ADT on Northridge Lane was 1,038 vehicles. Fire and
Rescue capability is within the established service standard with a travel time
not exceeding four minutes.
C. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN
The petitioner's request complies with the zoning ordinance and accompanying
standards. No negative impacts from the proposed use are anticipated. Site
plan review will not be required.
cam? -1
D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
The petitioner's request complies with the zoning ordinance and accompanying
standards. No negative land use impacts from the proposed use are
anticipated. Traffic impacts are expected to be manageable. Site plan review
will not be required.
PART III
STAFF CONCLUSIONS
The petitioner's proposal to operate a day care center is generally consistent with the
Transition and Development designations of the Comprehensive Plan. Any land use
impacts on neighboring properties should be minimal with manageable traffic impacts
onto Northridge Lane.
PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD
DATE: AUGUST 3, 1993
• ''• " ' ' ~ ' ''' ~ ~•~ Foi Staff Use Only
Proposed Zoning: Q' ( Use Type:
Proposed Land Use: -}-o ~ Y1~,~~ ~, C~1 1~7-T'2d" SC~vc~ ( J0.: ~~L
2 17ro ~`an-~ ...................
Does the arcel meet the minimum lot area, w'dANCEdISrREQUIRED FIRSTnts of the requested district?
YES ~_ NO IF NO, A VARI
Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES /_ NO ________
IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. NO
If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES ~_
Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF
THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE.
ws v
ws v ais v ,/
8 1 i2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee
Consultation /,/y >~: Proffers, if applicable
Application ::~..:. Metes and bounds description Adjoining property owners
~Yy ?S Water and sewer application
Justification
l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and
am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner.
Owner's Signature:
Fnr staff use only
Foi Staff Use Only: Case Number
, .pplicant
r
q -I
The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and
justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following
questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary.
Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance iSection 30-3) as well as the
purpose Hound at the beginninLg of the applicable zoningLdistrictclassification in the zoning ordinance.
NoT Q~D~~i~p.~~e. it/.5 ~eC~c~esf fir'(( ~0! iM/OaC{" Sccrrvc,</idi~ ~ro~erfies QS ale
~r`o~ra/r~ uJ;ll ~e lvCc.2~ec~ i.~ a.lrcac~y C'xisli~~ ~G~%~r~e,~ of the /1'1e/~sc
/~ II ,.-- ~/ l 5 /o ea.~e.cC 0/1 ~ lQv~ e- ~a rC el o~ /Q~1 C~ C1 ~.rt
~ap~~sf C,IurC~ . ~ hC ~:rlurC.~
etc fv rarh u~~~l~ ~~ Coy ~~-ed ~ ~;s JOa~cel. mac- /V ,~ ~'r ~~~~~
>°
i~ ~orMa~iJn
Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County
mprehensive Plan.
Dui er,~,~l,~ ch~~cGl ~fv~c iS /oca~Z.d. w; ~„~ ~. frLtr~si f~~~~Q/ /~~~ C<se
.~
~~or`1. l ~ %s i,s ~Gi c ('~.fc~v ~Y i~ ultii CGt CG~u~ ~G~ OCac/ Ca.~C- Ce~1 >4.rs Q,~'c,
enCouras{G( .
Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding
area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools,
parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Gra~~'~S of fir- r~a~sf w.l~ 'mPac;f- ~e ~%pa~~ 6y G~Gii/y list of
Qlrea~ y ex/~ ~ ~ . tae; l,~fl~e s as OpPoSeG~ ~o !~; ~/ee~ly e<.sc. Lf ~ l1 reg~,; f o no r~ e,c~ eo~.s~'~~
o~ add;fi~~;~~1 ~e~~~~~es. ~-e. ~"o -gum cons%sl5 of A~f~- -~edcoo/~ C~~ {,r .e%/y~ev,~`-a~~ ~~uc~c~,f~ a~zs
5~ /~ nteGQinc u~u%~ur{0~ S~er/r~l`0~1 7To/Y~ ~1e. ~lOccrS 0~ o~p~-~p~~~1~/i(Ov1. rY1/~u /~%. ~l~ouJ~it
ale ~oar~okt ~ . 4`~~'loo/ Cale~l dar, 112 arc ~-c u~sh ~~ l~"ce~~,.~~ ~~ ~,o ~ y5 eh,lc~~~, %7e~~
l( bC ~`7 ~%r~G~ Q~cc./~ r5or~ne~ y'o Se.ePerv, SC.~rrle CYIrldrCvl. !il/i~ iii rece~~ QdcQ:~tvh °~
~ar~,n Spaces ~o ~e i ~eGf r'~,~t. QrecL ~ ~L ~opo3eeQ aver- S~joo/ prp~rar~ e~Xr;slr~,~r~"~ '.
w,l( h~ ad e9 ~a~~, 7herc ti/; l( be ad e uc.~e. Space. ~ /o~ck e,~ o~ eti~ldfwl w~i/cGt w,l( na f
infer~'~r~, v~i~ Wcd~,esda,~ nr~h~ ~urC~ aG{~'V,~~~CS. `~~ lI
Theo P,oq~~~ x/; lI naf 6C i~l e~' `eel L~uti ~~ ~Cji ool hours 50 7-r1 Pry 'l~l, 11 bC ~a «~O~C7- on seh~ls. .
"~ '""" d
~h_e f~ro~ravn W~ (~ ~e mo:~n~a,he(~ ooze. ~y ~~ c,nu~c~l JC.'/~ou~Cl~S ~ So no i~Pa ova
Ct~Jv; ~r~~ ~~oPer~i'es or ('our,-{~ Parks Q~ reCre~~~o~ ~CCi l,~~i~es Q~c Qh fi"cr~QCt(e~.
,ans,~or~a~i on ~ the.. ~Cicf ~i ~ ~runn se~oo~ uloce~G( ~e_ by ~oc~v~~ ~C/i06 / du..s
~om G/e.~ Cove. ~~ew~e.~~an~ ~C~Joo~. Vie- ~a.ei ~,'~ i s wi rYl %r~ ~e. ~le~ ~o~e ~l~,e~~
SC~oo~ C~is~„•G~ , so ~'a~ls~o~-Ct~roh by aScl~tool 6LcS is p~~,'gDed ~r %n ~('~IOOI ~~~
p0~, C(~, l~C~t00/ ULcS ~0'RnS~rT"Q,77~oh l5 C~c ~~C~7~I y ~rod~'Ued To /vo~7~/~ic-YQc~ ~LJ/`~~/L tJh~~C~i
bor~e~ me ~tr~,;nQQ ~o~ ~~I~a~~C C/p,Se~S~ ~U ~c. ~e,'~~jz, o~ ~~ie~ ~ro/DOseU
J / /I ,~ /
/ ~/e!'G 1.c1'~~ 6C %~'I C/`~Q.S ~c.SC OT /V6/-'~'1!'id C ~/`idC
Q~'fer ~~vo/ ('arC iQroq~a~. d 9
i ~ ~ e la.~e C?{~ernoon ~-ours ~he~ %Oarcr~{~ fp~'e~s Rio ~e,~~ ~,./d ~~ ~~-'~
~ e ~ G ~~ l9cl e ua.~e ~~e~ aid s~uJ« ~G~/,~~'~s ~i-~y e~ ~3 ~ ~ Se~~e
~ 9
~Suhda morn%r~ fh~e, ~u-~,~o~, ~v ~s ~G,/dares Q~d ~-p ~'
_B I,, c5~'IOGc~~( CJe S~[~'71'G~G~1~. /~IP.I'G ~S~1acc~G( JZ~ /lo i~~C/'CGtS~. ivv'~Q~-/
h Y~ r-r, resG~n e- v e,~'e~`ov~s Qs 7~i~ ~Jro r~wr w~~/( ale, eov~ ~a%h e~ ~~t ek r'3J'~I'/1~
/ p ~
~QG ~. 1 [S.
wFW ~
J I ~ I ~ o~ 3 E ~ ~ W s' ~- ~~ rn+nFn 1Cildcn ~~ob~~t-J
aQQQQ ~NZ rc~ aOK it
xa< . <~~ a_ :a
~~
~i
p fi
~ Yt ~~
_ -- '~- 11
\ \\ ~t,~ t~tsi~n { ~~ a l ~ a ~~~ ~~ ; ~' ~ t~=* t 4 ~~ di ~ t - al
\ a ~ti( ~: d~ i ~~ ' ;- A# .~ t~C ,a x~ ~ 'Z +~7 1 t ~ ~ T - .~ `s /
~\ ~ i~•a ~a s ~~~ d ~ i 1 `p ~3~ i Ef Y V 13: ~~ ~i 1; ;~ ~i ys?a ~ 7 Z ~ °Z~ f _ i - i /
` ~ i;2 tip to " ~ - ~~ ' 'a . ~; i ~ + 1 II ss ~ R i I ~ ~j U -
~`'~~~\ Y !I'~ ~~Z'~~~ t ~ ~ R ti; ~p_.i~ ~ { d=4~?'~ i~2S ~ l I k: ~i~i ~ ~~?a $:? t' ~~ ''_ ~tl~f ~7 /
~ \ \\ ~if4~ .t~l~2~ Z i taF 1~ (j 2 ~ ~~:si ~, Zvi ~ ~ ail! ~~~ ~ +f 3} sf €s 1
~~.~ .. ~iFe, ~ a~i~al '~~~ {~~ z l'~a ~~F~ ~{-{Ef Y ~ _- ~at~l ~a~f ? E - 'i a \
~ s~f1Ft~1c- s: ,
~ ,s ~ I. /j ,
/ -111 Ill' i} 1~~~;f\t,~ 11,E .~~`+ii ~ ! sE I ~ ji.~~h-ram-. \, `d~ \ .\\ \,` `\ \
i
i R ,
a< / !I 1 I f f -~~ ' Y~. '1\ - ~l ~ f..' r ` ~ i ^~~., J?' , .J I `. r:^- I k'.
? / !1 ~ ~ !~, t }
~ /// ~ f f 'l+G p F
__ ;~ ~ ,~y
/
r-~
~ ~~ +
~^,• -
\\ 1`.11 1 ~\\\\ \\\`\ \ r 1 \~~~\ ~ \\ ~~'• _;* ~ ~ L
111111 11 111111\\`\ ~\~, \\ \ (\ '\ II ~ \\.\\\"'""~ `~ \ _ ±S-
1 11 111 1 1•`1111\ \ \ \\ 1 ~ 1p. 1 n`i ` ~ \ ~-`
I j1 11 11111 -'. \ ~ C . \Q\ \ ~ '1 ~` ~: .
l I .11 1 1! 114111 \ \\~ / \\\\`\~ ~ 1 ~c,:
11 1 1 11 11 111 ` 11 1\\ 1 \~ e±t \\\~\~s \ ,.~~ -~-~_~_
1 ' ' ~ `1 1 1 '111`1 \ 1 1 '~. \ l 1 , 1 \\`.~'. ~~ ` I -•~ my;{
~1 1 11'11 I :~-11111 \111111\ 1\~ \,~\ / I \~,.~~ 1 /~"\, 1 e~~Y-_
II ~ 1 ! 1• ~ 1 1 '11 1,; 1\ 11111 1; \ 1 l1 4 '.\\ \ / l /'. l ..1 w. ,
\;' y, 1
~~- `1 iI t \`111 11'\1~\\ 11\;•~./ \
~) ~ ~ , 1 \\ \ \, / -,
t 1 1 1 \ 1.11 ~. \ \•.,\ II ``.`~T "
1 1 ,11,~ 1 1 r~
I ~ ~ ~ ~} 1 11 -\
\
•~ \ \
' ~ ~~
"
mss- 3
*s~
:~ 1•- -:i ! i -
~TJ'I i•- .
/ / / / ~'
~' ! ~I
@~ ~ I°
t~ ~ ~
~ 3
9\ I~["~l
I ~`
.Jl. i}I I• ~Fi=
/ - .; f
.' ~_se,
.I
,.~ I I
' ~ I'
1' I S
j - -- - -
1
I ~
I ;
~ f I
it
Il'
? i~
- i=:•
.,
~ ~ / • I
~- I - -- ! ~; (il
.~ (
/ / `I
r~ ~ I ~ I +~5~ % / i I 1 + ~1
r I + +. " I 1 I
t If '.if'• f ! .I .
.~i~'c`
~ \ 11. 111.
~:
'y:
~,.7£~.; "1 ~
f ix I ~ d- li
•z
I f ~ ti ;
e4 4' 1
< 1 ~~- f + ~1~" 11
+ 1 f /•
~ / ~ ~ ~ I ~~~~ •
- ~ E/;- j ~~:i51 -
4y a - ~_'/_~ , - /l Vii) 1 c
1
- I .~1_ c ,~I~11~ -
i~' c +• v ~ (I 'i0
;i 1
~~+w.snc-seav.:.a..sr,..~+--r~i ter. .. . -s ~•r~. ro i- - _ - ~.'~ _
C -_ .. .,.~ . BSQi~Sih: 7J~dilB02F ~` f -.vY.Y -
._ ~ - ,
_ :- u~s~~ ~s~dEg asoiiey~ fl
~, ~p
~!E - _ _ ..
• \;\
Ii Q I
` ~ ~ ! N 3x ~
~ . ~ ~ E 4
--,~~-
x .e
~. E ~ '~ I.
Ilt3r~~~ ~~~,~v~v~ ~ 1 ,
e
. 4-xi i ' ~ ~. ~ II
i.X ., i ; H
i V ' I
I
I ~~ ~ ` I
~ I I
~:: t s ~~'~ ~ ;y,il; ~ ~ - ~ ,iii ?
~_ ~ _
,;~ ., ,,, r., ., ~
- e ~~ I
r , 'I
~~ ~ ~
{ ~ _
~i
~
t
_ - ~~~
~ ~;
~
~
-
y ~ ,
,i i
l i L ] ..
,~ , I~~ti~~ ~~ ~ ~ . r; `
i ~
I~ fly
_
7
j~ .1 7
T
~~ I
~
t. _ ~
~ ~
j .
- ~ ~ ~i
~
_
S ' ~ _
i
_ ~ - ~
.
~- _ I
I
~~ • - ~ - --
II ~ I,
•
I ~'
~-=--~
r -
f~~pr' ~4~ i~ -'~'I
+~iii f._. ..._cJ/ ...- ~ .~_._..- , .... ., _ .. Y.. ... ..,_ ,.. ..]+._ ~ r. _..- -- - - '_sl ~*~•..t_~ ._.. s.a; '.~`~a..`4~+„_s~~` ~. _"'
Q-r
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, -1993
ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
MELROSE BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES TO OPERATE AN
AFTER SCHOOL DAY CARE PROGRAM LOCATED AT 3520
PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX PARCEL 37.10-1-22)
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Trustees of the Melrose Baptist Church have filed
a petition to operate an after school day care program located at
3520 Peters Creek Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on August 3, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
held a first reading on this matter on July 27, 1993; the second
reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 24,
1993.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use
permit to operate an after school day care program located at 3520
Peters Creek Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substan-
tially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant
to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia,
as amended.
2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to
operate an after school day care program located at 3520 Peters
Creek Road in the Catawba Magisterial District.
agenda\zoning\melrose
1
II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
-PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCECITIZENS COMMENTS
rr //
SUBJECT: ~~ r5 ~ ~ li u y , G' I' ~ ?- ~.~, /`Tryc~~l~r, ~'r ~ ~'~' ~r=r ~ r'
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR TIC RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME ~~, ,, ` . J ~ /
ADDRESS ~ ~% ;' ? ~:~ r~r-'- _~ {~ ~ ~- r~~ ~ _Sc: ,l~ fn , ~~ y ~-~ 3
PHONE l 7c~ ~) ~ ~;. ~ ~ ,;~,,~ t
II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO. "~?
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCE /CITIZENS COMMENTS
a ,~ ~%
SUBJECT: h' : ~ ~ , ,,- - vr_x: ' 1 ~/i ,,- . ~ . _1 ~ ~,,~,-/ 1_ r~~k n.~ i ~ r{-~(< <-~n ~ -4
`~f~~~~ ~~r~ ~a~~~c~.
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII..L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will 6e limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME /~" ~~ ,~c, i2 ~ ~ ~ /b ~ r c ~
ADDRESS `
'~ ~t ~ "7 ~~ r ~a c~ 5 h cti~ 3 r r'L
PHONE ~ ~.1_ P ~.~ , ~~ . ~~ ~ I
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111111111,, • .
111111111111
11111111111 ~O• ~~
.11111 ~A 1~M
ASE R
.~' T F~
~~ DES ~zs
~~ ~Q ~pMME
~~` C~ ,r I.~Z~~s
,~~~~ ` IC 1~~Ag1~~, ~1e ,~~;n~ G f ,~~~a °~ G vpe~is°~ a e°m~e
~ ~ ,,
fs ~y ~
~~ s ,!,~,, ~ ~ ~- ~ ~~~T ~~ 1 U ~ ` e B°ara ° s° that 1 ~A~ ,~
C'~ ~ ~k ~ an °~ ~~ e utter G~ ~ E $~
B1E e Cha'r' the ab°~ , I ~L ~~ ~1~
d >>he th eeting °~ EC~~ AG~~ ~
1 L 1 en
• t° c°T'i'tnwiU
1 e°aur~n$ th ~~ ~~ R~C~R~ ,,vies ,,c~a~ an
L
~ ~ Cp'L ~g ~ BE1J~~ • e t° Div ~e~ ,tb SCeaking of rbe
~'~ SS F ~15~~ een thY tes`ntatcitizens tpaajot~ty
~~~ ~`YS .yen be a1 °~ te4 bet °f a by the
G~~~ wi11 be ~~ ina~v on the ss ~sttvete °f view °t'ty
Baker . as a area u~i1e °int an•
Each sp s4eak~nglitt'it b the tv~e the't ha~cm e
ether tit'l'e fume i°n °f tre ~ ee°gn~z
~ d ci ee ana ~~o ~ use' a ~e e~t =~ai~ea by to be~eet~ a t
issv 'a to a° ilea t° ay be Reba
B°at = wi11 b a~ ~mat~°n m t° tie B a>>o ea. at a>> times'
~ S oes i°rs °f c st be a~ embe s ~s ~°t tC1se a°v~tesy ardl °~ c°mt~
Q co~~'e°a a a'e~ee t~c- ienee w~>> eXe n statements G~
s4eaket an ana tre ava ve any ~'tte Gp,1`ZI ~Rp~1S
tb speakers estea t° lea OF ~ ZATIO ~T ~~~~
~ B° ens are tegv ~ BE~,I,p,~T~O~p~S~
~ sir the c1et1~' pE~~BE CLE ~~AL TO E~
w~ ~~ ~g ~T8 ~~~ I~Nt ~ CL
a 1~DIV1L FIT, w11`~G G~ TO
T h ' \J Q~~ ~ ~~
D e , ~ ~~G~
Dig SE~ly
m r . -7 ~
ider, n
t o d - ~'~ ~ Z ~~~
C. ~ y ~. .
Water ~ _,.~,, ~~:
was a ~ f ~. j~` L~
m r . S ~ SS ~ ~~r~-~~ ~ ~~` 111111111,
R W D, o f p,~~~ 1111111111
above r
RWD is ~ p~~~ 1111111111 ~c DEQ-
1111111111 ,~,echanisms to
deal wit 1111 _ (i.e. Notices of
Violation 111111 ,,,dge has violated fir.
Sligh's r 11111 _.~ing where he works and by
copying h~ ~~~1111 ~~0 re1 atar~ ~~,-..e~~~„a..___ r~ _ ,
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
AGENDA ITEM NO.
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: ~~~~~~ 1`~y~ ~~-
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII..L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking ,as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
.~:
AGENDA ITEM NO. _~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
;GPUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS
~., ~ ,
SUBJECT: ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ ~a . _~ ~~ ~~ ~~,
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking .as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME C~ ~~~ ~; ~ l) _,j,~~~~ ~'~ ~Pu
ADDRESS . ~ /~ / (~~~~~ ~-/~'l/ ~~1.
PHONE ~ ~ 7~-~,3 ~~
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
ii~iiiiiii~~ii~iiii~ii~iiii~iiiiiiii~~~i~~iiiiiiiii~i~~iii~iiii~~iiiiiii~~~iti
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR
PUBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCECITIZENS COMMENTS
SUBJECT: C ~ ~, `~ . e~ s C~ri~~n etr~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize
me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.
WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.,L GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE
GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW:
^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an
issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the
Board to do otherwise.
^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only.
Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP
SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE
GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
G- d ~~s ~v,~~~~~,
~~: ~ ~ ~`c ~~-~: ~ i,~ti ° y
~~ .. y~s ~-3~ z
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
~ pOAN ,1.~
~' A
z
z
a~
1838
C~~ixx~#g ~# ~.~~x~~~~
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COU NTY ADMI N ISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
Ms. Mary Anderson
1016 Grove Lane, NW
Roanoke, VA 24019
Dear Ms. Anderson:
August 31, 1993
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL FUZZY MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday,
August 24, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
appoint you as a member of the Social Services Advisory Board,
representing the Hollins Magisterial District, for a four-year
term. Your term will begin on August 1, 1993, and expire August 1,
1997.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed.
or re-~ppointe3 to any public body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also
sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act.
State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk
~f the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be
administered prior to your participation on this Board. Please
telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have the
oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requested that you bring this
letter with. you.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County,
please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your
willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
j ~ ,
H. de 1/ "F~i zzy" Minnix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Enclosures
cc: Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Department
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court
~'
®Recycled Paper
~ p A
r
a
Z
KJ
~3
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COU NTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ELMER C. HODGE H. ODELL'FLJZZY MINNIX. CHAIRMAN
!703) 772-2004 CJ1VE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE 8. EDDY. VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL OISTRIGT
BOB L JOHNSON
HOWlIS MAGWTERIAL DISTRICT
Au ust 25 1993
9 EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.
f uTAwaA M/-aISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Reverend Samuel W. Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
5521 Lamplighters Drive, N.W.
Roanoke, VA 24019
Dear Reverend Crews:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the
invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, August 24, 1993.
We believe it Is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the
Board is very grateful for your contribution.
Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us.
Sincerely,
~.
~~~~ ~,~
H. Odell 'Fuzzy" Mlnnix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
~5 ~
~~~ ~~
~ ~~
~~~~~
® Relyebd PapK
-~' ~ pOAly ~.
' ~
a
1 38
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
August 25, 1993
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTIIt1AL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN
CATAWBA MAGLSTERU-L DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
H. ODELL FUZZY MIN NIX
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
County Primary and
Road Fund Revenue
Code of virginia,
Section 33.1-75.1
1992-93 County of
Mr. James S. Givens:
Acting State Secondary Roads Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Mr. Givens:
Secondary
Sharing Program
Fiscal Year
Roanoke
(703) 772-2005
The County of Roanoke, Virginia, indicates by this letter its
official intent to participate in the "Supplemental Revenue Sharing
Program" for Fiscal Year 1992-93. The County will provide $200,000
($200,000 maximum) for this program, to be matched on a dollar-for
dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia.
The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed
the attached prioritized list of eligible items of work recommended
to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands
that the program will be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests
exceeds available funds.
Sincerely,
~~~~~
11 It
H. Odell Fuzzy Minnix
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
dj
pc: Jeffrey Echols, Resident Engineer
Attachment: Priority Listing of Projects
® Recyded Paper
i o .-,
a~z~
} ~ ~ } ~Z ~ ?
? ~Z~ ? ~
-1-
I r
~m~o
wo
ro
0 oW 0 0
0 0 o I
~
30~ ~ q
> o a > >
~ ~ > > >
o_ _
~ Z
Uf I x 3
yF y a~
i
~
x
I
~ Ow
O Q> I ~r s
~
sr I
O
J
m E> i> W"' I
C~
Q O
W
~m K~
NW
U N
HN I
~ I ¢~
JW JN QN d!' J~ JN ~J
d"' d~ OU
~ Qz
Z~
'. Qr Q ~ I
vrii crn ~~ I ~
rZ.N ~ ~
} F- Z
d' O O
p_Nw W
> i W W W W
r > r r W W W
Lr r I r
0 i
o o ~ o o i
° o I o v
m
} ~ z
~- ~ ~
~
w<¢
U U1
~ ~ ~
d~ a r
r
N ~N ~ d N r
r
~ ~ ~
N
~
z
(n }
U O
JQ
~ ~
°o l
~1'
T
~ ~
~
I
~
Q = w
~ a m °~ '" N ~ I
_ ~ I
~ _
~~
~ T
~
t
w ~
~
~
~
~
W
W ~ Z
~
O
O 3~
W W
~rfr
d' K p
o Z o
~('IN
vo_'~ NANO NEN nQN
~.D W^ Km K~ Nip ~p Np~wW
Z.. ~.-~F.-~ I Wm
m Q'h 2q W
m
o w
~W 0~ I Wp JSJ
N q NV7W SO
2'
I R'mg
^
W Z ~ ~
~ W rn O H
w o2'oK
~~
~ I ~
~
.Z.~Or ..W.Z-,W rWOW rWQ'J
~ r~ a~o~ ~~o~ ~~zu W
K ~OUd
rH~ rWjW ol7 oU
`"moo '"z~z ~zoZ i
'I
I
W I U ~ o
WZrz 1.. l,. r ~ H ~ W ~ r ~ ~- WFr~ I i
-
0 ~ ~ W a
- ~ I ! ~ i ~
~ J }. ~ =
l
o~ w a °~ ~; I ~ N I t
N I N I m I I
~ 3
~
I-
~~ -I
- -~ ~ I ~
I
Z z
Q = ~ i I
~ W ~
~ O
~ ~'~
" ~
o ~ o_
o ° ~ o ~ o
~ o
W W
J
~ J W
O-
I- _~
~ ~ L o I ~ ~
- ~ -~
-
W
W O> Z
J Q~} I
N
N N I O N
> Z }
N N O
Y Y I Z
I
~ O 7~2
w w 3 cn
~rz Y T
_i
~ ~
~
~
~
~
-~
pcOa
a Z ¢
z
1 Q
Q
Q
z z I z z
~ Q
¢
¢
z z z
~
~
- ~- -t-
-
I -~ -I- -1
ZN
U Z N I ~i I o I °o
o
J
~ ~ ~
Q l=i V O
~ 11
O
(7 ~ N o .. N " N
,
~ I I I I
_
G I ~ I~
J O
W Q
J~
z m M
oo I
I oo I o
~ ° o m °
°
~
O vi o
I
~ O
I I I
I
~ W I - - ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~- --i ~
~ I
~' ~
I ~
(n W ~Q~ ~ I Z I q J U ~ I
~
WOW O
~~~ mJ ~q~0 ~ N.J.m
NZ~ In~m NyN Nqm UN NW.p N N
NYm ~Q
.~. ~2~ r I
O Z~
a'-O °or
NW I N Jw .pW W NoZW m ZW
70F, ~`.-r QF- U7Qr
m
K m
' q
N QW ~ ZW NQw O
mfr ~Dr N r
qK m
~2
'
aim
~ w~
a ~UQ'
NK 4
yd
I ~~ o
0
K2
N M ~ u] m I~ 00
~ P AN
ti
z
°v ...
1 38
(2~~ixrt#~ ~# ~.~~txt.~~.e
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
August 25, 1993
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODEL.L "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Mrs. Candy Smith
6136 Burnham Road
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mrs. Smith:
At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 24, 1993, the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the
Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. for a raffle permit. The
raffle will be conducted on October 9, 1993.
The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed.
You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be
displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The
State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a
calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December
31, 1993. This permit, however, is only valid on the date
specified in your application.
PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO
COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT.
YOU MUST FILE A FINANCLdI. REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR
YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO
DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES.
PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR
If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 772-2003.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, CMC
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Commissioner of the Revenue
Commonwealth Attorney
County Treasurer
® Regded paper
... ,
I
~~
..~; ~ ~~.
C~~~xxY# ~a~ ~~xx~.~~e
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
August 25, 1993
Mrs. James A. (Chris) Pickard
5460 Stonebrook Drive
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mrs. Pickard:
(703) 772-2005
The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Community
Corrections Resources Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs
of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time
are indeed all too scarce.
I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday,
August 24, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as an alternate member of the Community Corrections
Resources Board for aone-year term. Your new term will expire on
August 13, 1994.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or
appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you
a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County,
please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your
willingness to accept this appointment.
Sincerely,
r /{ ~~~~
r / ~, t.{
~.- - ~~.~
H. Odell "Fuzz~i"~innix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Phipps, VASAP
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODEL1 "FUZZY MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERUL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DSSTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DLSTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DSSTRICT
®Recycied Papa
o~p AN~.~
z
J ?
1838
COUNTYADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
August 25, 1993
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL "FUZZY MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Mr. Edward J. Kielty
5049 Williamburg Court
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Mr. Kielty:
The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Community
Corrections Resources Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs
of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time
are indeed all too scarce.
I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday,
August 24, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of the Community Corrections Resources
Board for a one-year term. Your new term will expire on August 13,
1994.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or
appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you
a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County,
please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your
willingness to accept this appointment.
Sincerely,
~i ~~~~
^~
~~ y
H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Phipps, VASAP
® Recycled paper
Y p~~ OAN ,`.~
~' ~
z
o
a
1838
COU NTY ADM I N I STRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
Ms. Deirdre Lee
2011 Cantle Lane
Roanoke, Virginia
Mr. Mike Zirkel
C/O Castle Rock Sw~
5950 Brahma Road S
Roanoke, VA 2401'
Dear Ms. Lee and M
Neither of you wer
meeting to receiv
Holland at the Ca:
recognize you at
Please call me a
know whether you
attend, we will r
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
August 11, 1993
~c~,wa G~ Grp,,,
gym" g~ Nti~.d.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL "FUZZY MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDGY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
---- us~~57ERIAL DISTRICT
tY C. NICKENS
TERIAL DISTRICT
lllc~,s~ s~„f(~
~~~ ~~
8/3 _
~YlJ r' ~~
~~' rd h oy~„~
/ice - ,~
cc : Ms . Jena ~f / ~ - ~ 2 t~ r~ ~Q C
2423 Maid ltd r ~~ b~ A~2.Se.h~
Roanoke, -""
)3) 772-2005
:rvisors
,g Alana
like to
3 let me
nable to
:rvisors
® Racyded Paper
... ,
,:.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
C~~~xxt~g ~f ~.~~x~~C~e
Ms. Deirdre Lee
2011 Cantle Lane
Roanoke, Virginia
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
August 11, 1993
24153
Mr. Mike Zirkel
C/O Castle Rock Swim Club
5950 Brahma Road S. W.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkel:
(703) 772-2005
Neither of you were able to attend .the July 27 Board of Supervisors
meeting to receive recognition for your actions in aiding Alana
Holland at the Castle Rock Swim Club. Therefore, we would like to
recognize you at the August 24 meeting at 3:00 p.m.
Please call me at 772-2003, by Wednesday, August 18, and let me
know whether you will be able to attend. If you are unable to
attend, we will mail you the proclamation.
Sincerely,
~~~ ~~, ~ -
Mary H. Allen, CMC
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: Ms. Jena S. Holland
2423 Maiden Lane
Roanoke, VA 24015
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL'FUZZY- MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
® RecyGed Paper
o~ ROAN ~F
a
ti . ,A
z
~ a2
1838
COUNTYADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
Ms. Deirdre Lee
2011 Cantle Lane
Roanoke, Virginia 24153
July 15, 1993
Mr. Mike Zirkel r
C/O Castle Rock Swim Club ~ ~'~ ~; r'~t-~ ~
5950 Brahma Road S. W. 7~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~
Roanoke, VA 24018
Dear Ms. Lee and Mr. Zirkel:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL "FUZZY MINNIX. CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
(703) 772-2005
Ms. Jena Holland informed me that both of you recently came to the
aid of her daughter, Alana at the Castle Rock Swim Club and
prevented a possible tragedy by your quick thinking.
In recognition of your actions, the Board of Supervisors would like
to present you with a Proclamation at their July 27, 1993 meeting
at 3:00 p.m.
Please call Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board, at 772-2003, by
Wednesday, July 21 and let her know whether you will be able to
attend. If you are unable to attend, we will mail you the
proclamation.
Sincerely, ,i'
,.
',
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
mha
cc: Ms. Jena S. Holland
2423 Maiden Lane
Roanoke, VA 24015
Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
® Recyded Paper
~MpORTgNT MESSAGE
FOR ~ G
DATE 7 _
TIME~A. M.
M P• M.
OF_
PHONE SC
Z
FAX AREA CODE o
O ~~~
NUMBER
~ MOBILE EXTENSION
AREA CODE
TELEPHONED NUMBER TIME TO CALL
CAME TO SEE YOU PLEASE CALL ~.~
WANTS TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
RETURNED YOUR CALL RUSH ~
SPECIAL ATTENTION
MESSAGE
0..
~ed~
_a. ~ L,1a t -1- ~
SIGNED I
TOPS ~ FORM 3002S
LITHO IN U.S.A.
TIM:
ECH would like you to prepare a Board Report for the 8/24 meeting
asking the Board to approve a "Silver ($2500) Sponsorship" for the
Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl.
I don't know where he wants the money to come from - either your
budget or Board Contingency Fund I guess.
Mary Allen
8/11/93
CHAMPIONSHIPS
1993 AMOS ALONZO STAGG BOWL
Saturday, December 11, 12 noon-Salem Stadium
SILVER CORPORATE PATRON PACKAGE
1. Fifty championship game tickets in a prime location
2. Opportunity to purchase twenty additional tickets
3. Six V.I.P. badges to signify your involvement
4. Six invitations to the Thursday Evening Reception
5. Six invitations to the Championship Luncheon on Friday
6. Six invitations to the Game Day Brunch
7. Half page advertisement in the official game day program
8. Three parking passes in special parking area for Championship.
9. Recognized as silver patron at all official functions.
The total cost for this Silver Patron Package is $2,500.00 and may
be billed either now or as late as January 10, 1994.
CHAMPIONSHIPS
1993
AMOS ALONZO STAGG BOWL
SALEM STADIUM
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 11, 12 NOON
CORPORATE PATRON PACKAGES
August 11, 1993
Memorandum
To: John Chambliss
From: Jim Jon
Subject: Draft Board Resolution and Report for Trails Grant
Please find attached the draft resolution, report and a copy of the
grant application to be included on the August 24, 1993 Board of
Supervisor's agenda. They have been stamped draft prior to your
review and approval, and a copy has been sent to Mary Allen.
If you have any questions, please give me a call. We followed the
same format and narrative used in the ISTEA resolution. Thank you
for your help.
cc: Mary Allen
agrant2a
VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL TRAILS FUND PROGRAM
Department of Conservation and Recreation
PROJECT APPLICATION
1. Applicant: Roanoke Count De artment of Parks and Recreation
2. Address: 1206 Kessler Mill Road
Salem, VA 24153
3. Contact person: Jim Jones Phone Number: (703) 387-6096
4. Government agency: ^ state ~] local ^ federal
^partnership ^non-profit organization ^individual ^other (speafy):
5. Name of Trail Project: Goo e
6. Land Classification: ~1 public ^ private ^ combination
7. LOCatlon(S) Of project: Roanoke County (see attached mapZ
8. Trail Use: ^ motorized
9. List all types of uses:
~] hiking/walking/strolling
^ cross-country skiing
^ motorcycling
^ jogging/running
® Other (Specify) Nature
C~ non-motorized
^ combination
^ four-wheel driving
^ equestrian
® bicycling
^ ATV
Interpretative, blue bird trails
10. Description of Project: Describe, in this space, the scope of work and/or anticipated
accomplishments: .
This is a greenway between two existing County parks. There is a path
worn through the area by residents demonstrating the need to properly
develop pedestrian and bicycle access. The following is needed to
properly develop the 3/4 mile trail.
-- gravel surface materials
-- signs for crossing residential
head signs
-- building up trail shoulders
-- access for disabled users
-- pedestrian bridges
streets, blazing, and trail
11. Type of Project and Quantitative Measures: (Please indicate in acres, miles, linear feet,
square feet, or other unit of measurement)
Type of Project
^ Maintenance
^ Restoration of areas
damaged by useage
^ Development oftrail-
side and trail-head facilities
^ Acquisition
^ Easement
^ Fee Simple
~ NewTrailConstruction
^ Other (specify)
12. Project Construction/Implementation Schedule:
Project Beginning Date (mo./yr.): 12/93
Estimated Project Completion date (mo./yr.): 12 /9~~
13. Ownership: Who will own and maintain the completed project?
Roanoke Count Board of Su e
14. Estimated Budget:
Design and Engineering Costs (performed by an outside
consultant incurred after the signed Project Agreement):
Direct Labor Costs (specify)*":
Equipment Rental:
Construction Costs (specify):
Materials Costs (specify use, material, quantity):
Total Project Cost
Your Share:
in-kind (specify): $11 000 1 P~uipment
cash: -o-
Total amount for which you are applying:
Measure:
50 acres
3/4 mile
3/4 mile
N/A
N/A
-o-
inkind
11 000
"'Note-- Funds may not be used to pay the salaries or wages of acfive employees.
ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY
This survey is a requirement for funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Please complete all
items except 4f, 5a, 5b and 5c, which will be completed by DCR. Only those projects selected for funding will
be submitted to the FHWA for their approval.
y. Name of Applicant/Project• Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation
2. Land Use:
a. Briefly describe the land use in the project area. Attach a land use map if needed.
Count Park used for athletics hikin tennis and icnickin
b. Is the project consistent with development plans for the area? Yes % No [ ]
C. Name of plan: Goode Park Greenway
3. Socioeconomics: Will the proposed project impact any of the following:
Y n y ~
a. Health/Education Facilities ~] - e. Public Utilities [ ] X
b. Emergency Service Providers [ ] X f. Local Tax Base [ ] X
c. Handicapped, Minorities, or Elderly ~] - g. Residential Areas ~] -
d. Economic Activity [ l X
4. Natural Resources: Will the proposed project negatively impact any of the following:
Y n y ~
a Soil Erosion or Sedimentation [ ] X g. Vegetation [ ] X
.
b. Streams, Rivers, or Lakes [ ] X h. Wetlands [ ] X
R
c Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat [ ] X i. Floodplains [ ]
.
d. Wild and Scenic Rivers [ ] X j. Coastal Zones [ ] X
X
e National Natural Landmarks [ ] X k. Agricultural Lands [ ]
.
f. Endangered Plants and Animals (To be completed by DCR) [ l X
5. Historic and Archaeological Resources (to be coordinated by DCR): Y n
a. Has the project been reviewed by the VA Dept. of Historic Resources (DHR)? - ~]
b. Will the project have an effect on historic or archaeological resources? [ ] ~-
c. If the project has an effect on historic or archaeological resources,
has the effect been coordinated by the DCR? - [ ]
6. Hazardous Wastes: Is there any potential for involvement with hazardous wastes? [ ] X
7. Noise: Is there potential. for the project to have a noise impact on surrounding land uses? [ ] X,.
8. Air Quality: Will the project have an adverse impact on air quality? [ ] -x-
9. Section 4(f)
a. Is the project located on a publicly owned park, recreational
area, historic site or wildlife and waterfowl refuge? ~ -
b. If yes, please mark the appropriate box and name the facility.
[XJPark' Goode Park
[ ]Recreation Area'
[ ]Historic Site
[ ]Wildlife/Waterfowl Refuge
' If the applicant is not the official having jurisdiction over the park or recreation area, a letter must be attached
from the official stating his her approval that the project is acceptable and consistent with the designated use of
the property and that he/she is satisfied that the applicant has committed to include all possible measures to
minimize harm.
~,( '
VIRGINIA RECREATION TRAILS FUND PROGRAIi
APPLICANT: Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation
PROJECT: Goode Park Greenway
NARRATIVE:
Presently we have two distinct parks in the same vicinity linked by
a vegetative strip through a residential development. This
greenway after developed will serve as a means for park users at
either site to have pedestrian or bike access to the other
location. Residents in the adjoining neighborhood will be able to
access the trail and the two recreation facilities in the same
manner. Facilities include athletic fields, picnicking, shelters,
tennis and basketball courts, rest rooms and concessions. The only
thing missing is a trail.
The Department currently has to mow and maintain open grass area
along the corridor and a local Girl Scout troop has installed blue
bird boxes in these mowed areas. A trail designation would serve
to interpret the bluebird boxes as well as appreciation for other
native vegetation along the corridor.
A well defined and developed trail surface would also give access
for disabled patrons. This would be the first accessible trail in
the Department's system.
Boy Scouts seeking their Eagle rank have looked at this as project
but have been unable to raise the funds necessary to do the work.
The local high school would be able to use the trail as a section
along their cross country course providing a safer running area for
these athletes.
Access to both ends of the trail is by automobile on state
maintained roads to County maintained parking areas. Signs for
information and direction will be installed as part of the grant
giving the user information on the trail and its availability. The
environmental effects would be minimal since the area already
functions as a buffer for homes and acts as water shed protection.
The trail would insure controlled user access and better
maintenance access for park staff to keep the greenway inspected
and patrolled. Our design standard will be to the same level as
Virginia State Parks and according to ADA requirements.
Ultimately the responsibility for maintenance will be upon the
Department. However, there is an adoption program established by
the Department and it has been successful at other sites. Scout
troops such as the~Girl Scout troop that installed the bird boxes
or troops from scouts seeking an Eagle project would be encouraged
to adopt the trail as part of their civic responsibilities. A park
watch program is in place for County parks and neighbors are
encouraged to help protect the parks in this manner which could
page 2
VRTF: Roanoke County
July 15, 1993
~~FT
increase the awareness, involvement and added support of the trail.
Residents are very aware of the conditions of the open space and
keep staff informed of its conditions. Also, the local high school
would be encouraged to assist in the development and adoption of
the trail once established.
The Department feels the trail will be an asset to the two parks
and the community. Already community leaders have taken an
interest in the beautification of the park by establishing a tree
program to plant dogwoods along the entrance road of the park.
Athletic and communities leaders have been involved in the concept
plan for further development of the park to provide additional
shelters, access and picnicking. It is hoped that the grant will
continue to add to this momentum for improvements and provide a
pedestrian/bicycle trail to Goode Park.
~h'9A?,
r --
i
1 ~ _ ~ - L7
~ - .: - ~ ~ ~
.; ~ ~
~ _ o W
~ Q ~- Q o~ W- ~. ~ w~ T.
' •, o .. ~ ~,.,~ _ `'dam - ~ ~? ~ ~ ! '`fl~"~~°
o ~
ebb Pc, ~ z P.F~ ~~ ° ~ `~~ V
-~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~e ~ R AN.
o
W ~ _
. c~\Y v .:: ICJ ~ ~
. P ~~ - 7
r 7, ` ~,,} 0 { p
Y t+ .r3~y ~ y~ ~ - pp~~~ ~ rygorJr i of Q c~j~---
~:.:
w lD C' ~o b~ ~. ~ ~ `~..
l, >:~ :3 ~ ~ c~ a ~, ~ P ~f=_..aa~~'-~:
y ~~ b 5 ey ~~ to ~ ~ ~ _:. ~ r
• ~ ~. o ~ c^ t Z
~ ~ ._ ~~„ _ ~iS3Ld o ° ° Bt,~.lupF AVM ~~ a'
~ W
w N W lWa. ~ u / ~
O , W
..::... > ~ ` ,,, ~y ° ¢ E_!_py ~ ~ ado '~ cp ;;~z== i6~
;'~^ t'::'' a a ,rd_ : o~---- : Y ¢ pit --$ . '-' W ~~
u•s -~~ ~ _
~ ~b .fir ~ •; ~ ~_
'lz i
~ ..
BURTON L. ALBERT
LAW OFFICES
BURTON L. ALBERT
4405 STARKEY ROAD, S.W.
POST OFFICE BOX 20009
RGANGKE, VIRGINIA 24018.0501
August 3, 1993
H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Re• Huntina Hills Country Club. Inc.
Dear Mr. Minnix:
r --
..~ ~ ,.
D - ~~'
(~~ ~U6 ~ 1993
___.____.~oral aX/..F HAD1ES____--
OFCOUNSEL
AREA CODE 703
776-8600
TELEFAX NO.
(703) 774-0135
Please accept this letter as a request on behalf of Hunting
Hills Country Club, Inc. that its claim against Roanoke
County for damages caused to its golf course by drainage
easement improvements performed by Roanoke County be placed
on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled meeting of
the Board of Supervisors (August 24, 1993).
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
BLA/cbk
Burton L. Albert
cc: Paul M. Mahoney, Esq., County Attorney
Hunting Hills Country Club, Inc.
O`~ POANp,Y~
ti
z c~
~ z
J .ate
1838
PAUL M. MAHONEY
COUNTY ATTORNEY
3 May 1993 JOSEPH B. OBENSHAIN
SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
VICKIE L. HUFFMAN
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
Burton L. Albert, Esq.
4405 Starkey Road, S.W.
Post Office Box 20009
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0501
Re: Claim of Hunting Hills Country Club
Dear Burt:
In response to your letter of Apri115, 1993, to Elmer C. Hodge, County Administra-
tor, I am responding on his behalf and on behalf of Roanoke County. I have met with
officials in the County's Engineering Department who worked on this drainage project, and
I have walked the site to observe the work and the alleged damages. On behalf of the
County, I am rejecting this claim. My reasons for this decision are set out below. If you
desire to pursue this matter, I will be glad to place this matter on the Board of Supervisors'
agenda. The amount of your client's claim should be submitted to me or the Clerk to the
Board of Supervisors, along with any additional materials you wish the Board to consider.
The reasons for the rejection of this claim are as follows:
1) the work that the County performed in February of 1991 on the Adams'
property was pursuant to a dedicated drainage easement;
2) the work that the County performed merely improved the existing, dedicated
drainage easement that had been in existence since this portion of the subdivision was
constructed;
3) any storm water discharged from or along this easement is into a natural
watercourse;
4) the work did not increase the quantity of storm water flowing across the
Adams' lot into the natural watercourse;
5) it is apparent from an examination of the Adams' and golf club property that
the topography of the land has been altered by the golf club to relocate the natural
drainage and natural watercourse in this area; and
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2007
~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~.~2~
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
® Recycled Paper
Page Two
3 May 1993
6) although the County utilized a natural watercourse by allowing it to carry
water that would naturally find its way there, and the County participated in certain
maintenance and improvements upstream in a dedicated easement, it does not thereby
assume or exercise control for all purposes over the remaining downstream portion of the
watercourse.
In response to the questions you pose in your letter, let me attempt a reply. First,
who is liable? You attempt to place liability upon the Adams and the County by referring
to "a problem with surface water from property maintained by the County." Could you
please identify this property? Are you referring to Hunting Hills Drive? If so, you may
want to contact the Virginia Department of Transportation, since it has authority over State
secondary roads. Further the original developer of Hunting Hills, which was, I presume,
your client's predecessor in title, constructed these improvements: not only the Adams lot,
but also the golf course. Your client may want to review the original design of this area,
particularly as it affected the natural watercourse. In light of the foregoing, I would argue
that the County is not liable.
With respect to "damages," I suggest that you provide a detailed claim to me or the
-Clerk, so that we may place this claim on .the Board's agenda for consideration.
The cost to correct the problem in order to prevent future similar occurrences may
be significant, particularly since your client or its predecessor significantly altered the
topography as it effects the natural drainage and the natural watercourse. Even assuming
that some liability may reside with the County, your client cannot ignore its culpability for
its actions. Quite simply, it cannot relocate the natural watercourse, then cry "foul" when
water flows naturally. I can volunteer the assistance of County staff to work with your
engineer to develop a solution, not only for your client, but for all of the homeowners in
this area.
I realize that your client will not welcome this reply on behalf of the County. I
suggest that your client may want to review the historical facts of this entire development,
and then reassess its position in light of these facts and its responsibility for these
"damages". It may find that its injury is self-inflicted.
Very truly yours,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
PMM/spb
LEGAL NOTICE
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF BIIPERVISORS
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 24, 1993, in the Community
Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Melrose Baptist Church
Trustees for a Special Use Permit to operate an after school day
care program, located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba
Magisterial District.
A copy of this application is available for inspection in the
Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
VA.
Dated: August 4, 1993 ~~~~ ~/
O Lam'
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News
Tuesday, August 10, 1993
Tuesday, August 17, 1993
Direct the bill for publication to:
Melrose Baptist Church Trustees
3520 Peters Creek Road, NW
Roanoke, VA 24019
(703) 366-6631
SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO:
ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE~ VA 24018
V ~ ROAN ~F
~ ~
z ..
2
a
13
(~~~xxt#~ ~~ ~~~xx~~C~.C.e
P.O. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(703) 772-2004
August 11, 1993
Mr. Clifford 0. Rhodenizer
Route 4, Box 203A
Appomattox, VA 24522
Dear Mr. Rhodenizer:
(703) 772-2005
In observance of the 25th anniversary of the Roanoke County seal,
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors would like to present to
you a Resolution of Appreciation for designing the seal in 1968.
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to invite you
to attend their meeting on August 24 at 3:00 p.m. to receive the
resolution.
Please call me at 772-2003 by August 18 and let me know if you will
be able to attend. We look forward to honoring you at the August
24 meeting.
Sincerely,
yr~ ~, ~w. Q~c.c.c~.,
Mary H. Allen, CMC
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
H. ODELL'FUZZY° MINNIX, CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
® R~,yaaa P~~
V
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fuzzy Minnix, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Elmer Hodge -~
County Administrator
DATE: August 3, 1993
SUBJECT: Appointment to the VWCC Board
During a recent conversation with Dr. Charles Downs at a rotary meeting, he advised
me that he knew of several potential nominees to replace Pat Schafner on the
Virginia Western Community College Board. They are:
Geoffrey Ottaway -Avis Dealership
Jim Arend -The Atlantic Company
George Pelton - 1st Team Hundai dealership
Dr. Downs emphasized that these are only suggestions of individuals he knew were
willing to serve and are residents of Roanoke County. If the Board members have
other potential nominees, he will be delighted to work with them also.
I don't know if Mr. Schafner has officially resigned yet, but since he no longer
resides in Roanoke County he is not eligible to serve and I suggest we go ahead
and fill his vacancy.
CC: Members of the Board of Supervisors
Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board
~~~~~
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mary Allen
Clerk of the Board
FROM: D. K. Cook
Director of uman Resources
DATE: June 1, 1993
SUBJ: Grievance Panel Appointment - Joy A. Herbert
As indicated in the attached letter from Joy A. Herbert, she will
not be available for re-appointment to the Roanoke County Grievance
Panel.
cvs
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2018
® ii•Cycl•d P•p•r
L'eggs Products, Inc.
,~ ~ i00 Intervale Drive
Salem, VA 24153
(703)389-4581
May 21, 1993
Mr. D. Keith Cook
Director of Human Resources
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
3433 Brambleton Avenue SW
Roanoke, VA 24018
X1234
~ ~ -'~t9
JUG 193 'o
N
R°'"°~r~
Hume ~
poi
~ZOZ648~' ~~
Dear Keith:
I wanted to let you know that
for the County of Roanoke expires in
reappointment.
when my term on the Grievance Panel
September I am not available for
Let me assure you this has nothing to do with some of the hearings
we have had! My husband has accepted a position in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina and we will be moving this summer. His position starts June 7th
and I plan to move as quickly as possible but don't have a specific date
at this time.
Best wishes to you in your many activities in the County of Roanoke.
Sincerely,
~rQ ~~~
Joy A. Herbert, SPHR
Human Resources Manager
L~
Dlvlslon o1 Sara Lee Corporation
AUGUST 24
Reso-Chocking girl
Recogn-County Seal Anniversary
Diane Hyatt-CAFR Award
2nd - Amateur Radio Towers
Work Session - Vehicle Replacement Policy
PH-Special Use Permit-Day Care -Peters Creek Road
2nd-Easements for So. Transmission Line
Ord. Motor Vehicle Code changes
Ord. Bingo & Raffle
Recommendations for cregional efforts to send aid to midwest
lst - Lease extensions - Travelers
ECH,PMM Eval
~~~
8- i~- 93
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
AUGUST 24, 1993
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each
month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement
in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meeting or other
programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the
Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least
hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made.
B
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Samuel W. Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE
ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS
i
C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGI~TITIONS, AND
AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Clifford and Betty
Rhodenizer for Designing the Roanoke County Seal.
2. Resolution of Appreciation to Deidre Lee and Mike Zirkle
for Their Actions on July 2, 1993.
3. Recognition of Receipt of the Governmental Finance
Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financing Reporting.
D. NEW BUSINESS
-1 ~s o o -~' S t.~PPo r~ '~o r
/, ~ Request Grant Application to the
Virginia Recreational Trails Fund Program. (Jim Jones,
Assistant Director of Parks)
S~~Po~t ~/
2. ~ Request for the 1993 Alonzo Stagg Bawl
in Salem, Virginia. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic
Development) ~- a ~.~ - a . ~.oa
~ 3, ~ r~o
~ 0, O~~ 3. ~ Claim for Damages from Hunting Hills County Club
(Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney)
y. ~ Authorization to Apply to the VPSA for ~ Fall 1993
Financing of School Projects (Diane Hyatt, Director of
Finance)
,~' ~ Consideration for Additional VDOT Revenue Sharing
Projects for Fiscal Year 1992-93. (Arnold Covey, Director
of Engineering & Inspections)
E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
a
.3'0 ~~nrt ,,,~ f S ~
1. Request for Work Session on September 14 to Discuss
Capital Planning. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director)
c~h 9
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC ~[EARINGS
G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA
h~ ~~ ~ ~
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing the Lease Extension in Connection
with Office Space in the New County Administration
Center.
2 ~----r i' ~~
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance 82592-12,
The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County to the
Adoption of Certain Provisions Concerning Amateur
Radio Towers in the Various Zoning Districts of the
. County. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning)
2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary
Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line.
(Clifford Craig, Utility Director)
3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-8,
3
Adopting of State Law of Article I, of Chapter 12, Motor
Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul
Mahoney, County Attorney)
J•
4. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Article V. Bin o
Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, Amusements of the
Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney)
APPOINTMENTS
1. Grievance Panel
2. Industrial Development Authority
3. Virginia Western Community College Board
K. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA
ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND
WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM
OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
1. Approval of Minutes -July 13, 1993, July 27, 1993
2. Confirmation of Appointments to Community Corrections
Resources Board and the Social Services Advisory Board.
3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit From the Cave
Spring Elementary School PTA.
4
4. Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for
Lease/Purchases of Fire & Rescue Vehicles
5. Request for Acceptance Olney Road and Corllens Lane
into the Virginia Depa tment of Transportation Secondary
S stem.
L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid -July, 1993
5. Report on 1991 Water Project
6. Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste
Facilities.
7. Report on Bond Projects
8. Report on Regional Cooperative Effort for Providing Aid
to the Midwest Flood Victims.
5
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning a prospective
S ~ business or industry where no previous announcement has been
~r~,,,~~ made of the business or industry's interest in locating in the
community; (?) Discussion of Audit of Volunteer Fire and
C,p~~4~ ~~ Rescue Squads. D~K ~~
~ ~ ~'" on
P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
EVENING SESSION
Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate
an After School Day Care Program, Located at 3520
Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon
the Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. (Terry
Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning)
R CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1NIli~ICTNICATIONS
S. ADJOURNMENT
6
August 24, 1993 Meeting
K Authorization to pay certain legal fees
Grumman Aircraft Company - Firetruck Litigation
2nd Readins~s
Ordinance amending and reenacting ordinance 82592-12, the Zoning Ordinance for
~i Roanoke County, by the adoption of certain provisions concerning amateur radio towers
in the various zoning districts of the County
Ord. authorizing acquisition of necessary easements to construct the South Transmission
~ Line
~'
i~ ~ Ord. amending and reenacting Sec. 12-8, Adopting of State Law of Article I of Chapter 12,
Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code
~ U(' Ord. amending and reenacting Article V, Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4,
Amusements of the Roanoke County Code
~,~ ~ Ord. authorizing lease extension in connection with office space in the new county
administration center - BOARD REPORT????
,- .. rC `~
Resolution -Reimbursement Regulations for Equipment Lease Financing ~~'
i
~~ ~- Hunting Hills Country Club -Claim for damages
Reminder -adopt floodplain management measures and have approved by regional office
staff (FEMA)
MAYBE
rf
.~ Decal ordinance enforcement - if JBO gets comments back from Burkart, Cease, Compton,
Green
Business license tax exemptions - if JBO gets comments back from Compton
Board Reports for 8/24 meeting:
Consent
(1) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County in connection with the Route 11 project of the Virginia Department of
Transportation
(2) Donation of sanitary sewer and water line easements to the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County in connection with the T.C.E. Project to the County of Roanoke
(3) Donation of right-of-way to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in
connection with extension of Spring Grove Drive
First Reading
(1) Ordinance for Authorization to Acquire a Sanitary Sewer and Water Line Easement
From Dairymen, Inc.
v~
~VERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
July 27, 1993
Respond to•
Department.of Fiscal Services
County of Rockingham
P.O. Box 1252
Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801-1252
Mr. Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
County of Roanoke
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
~ r~t--
Dear Mr. ge:
Congratulations on the recent receipt of the Government
Finance Officer's Association Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in financial reporting for your most recent
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. I have been advised
that your annual CAFR has once again qualified for this
prestiguos award. As your state representative for the
G.F.O.A. from Virginia, I commend you and your government
for the committment that you have made to the highest
standards of governmental financial reporting. This award
reflects the professionalism, leadership, expertise and many
hours of dedicated service that have been provided by staff,
management, appointed and elected officials.
On behalf of the Virginia Government Finance Officers'
Association, I commend you for your efforts and call upon
you to continue to strive for excellence in ail aspects of
your financial reporting.
Sincerely,
~C~-
Joseph S. Paxton
State Representative
cc: Members of the Virginia G.F.O.A. Executive Board
V
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601
312/977-9700 • Fax: 312/977-4806
April 28, 1993
For information contact:
NEWS RELEASE Stephen Gauthier (312) 977-9700
(Chicago)--The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finan-
cial Reporting has been awarded to:
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States
and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report
(CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of
recognition in the area of governmental accounting and finan-
cial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant
accomplishment by a government and its management.
An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded
to the individual designated as primarily responsible for
preparing the award-winning CAFR. This has been presented to:
VINCENT K. COPENHAVER, CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the
high standards of the program including demonstrating a construc-
tive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its
financial story and motivate potential users and user groups
to read the CAFR.
The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving
12,625 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago,
Illinois, and Washington, D.C.
- 30 -
WASHINGTON OFFICE
1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 650, Washington, D.C. 20006
202/429-2750 • Fax: 202/429-2755
TO: Board Members
ECH
For your information.
Gene Wagner called this morning (8/19) and asked that the Fire and
Rescue Chiefs Board be placed on the August 24 agenda at 7 p.m. to
discuss the County's request for audits from the Fire and Rescue
Departments. Their primary concern is that we release the County's
funds immediately rather than waiting for them to complete an audit
or answer the questionnaire that Diane Hyatt sent.
Mary Allen
8/19/93