Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/27/1993 - Regular~ pOAN ,~. F ' is _' a~ 1838 C~.aix~t#~ .af ~..o~~tx~~~P ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JULY 27, 1993 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:00 P.M. 2. 3. Invocation: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS FM DIRECTED STAFF TO BRING BACK REC011~IlVIENDATIONS ON 8/24/93 CONCERNING COOPERATIVE REGIONAL EFFORTS FOR SENDING AID TO THE MIDWEST ® Recycled Paper C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Receipt of Safety Performance Award from Virginia Municipal Liability Pool. (Margaret Nichols, Administrator) AWARD ACCEPTED BY CHAIRMAN NIINNIX 2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of July 31 -August 1, 1993 as "The Battle of South Salem". R-72793-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO UW 3. Resolution of Appreciation to Reta R. Busher for Her Service to Roanoke County from 1984-1993. R-72793-2 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC D. BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing on Improvements to the C&P Telephone System. (Don Reid, Manager) BRIEFING BY DON REID 2. Quarterly Report on 1991 Water Projects. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) BRIEFING BY CLIFFORD CRAIG AND TED PETOSKY, PROTECT MANAGER 2 3. Quarterly Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities. (John Hubbard, CEO, RVRA) BRIEFING BY JOHN HUBBARD PART B PERMIT RECEIVED E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Applications for Roanoke County Projects. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) R-72793-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE & ADOPT RESO URC 2. Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Application for the River Foundation. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) R-72793-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE & ADOPT RESO URC 3. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement between the Town of Vinton, the City of Roanoke, and the County of Roanoke Relocating the Boundary Lines Between Said Governmental Entities. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-72793-5 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC F. OLD BUSINESS 3 1. Request for Readoption of the Public Private Partnership Policy. (Continued from July 13, 1993) (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) R-72793-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO READOPTING POLICY URC G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BL.T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR 8/24/93 URC 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate an After School Day Care Program, Located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line. (Cliff Craig, Utility Director) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 4 2ND -8/24/93 URC 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-8, Adopting of State Law of Article I, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 8/24/93 URC 3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, Amusements of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 8/24/93 URC LBE REQUESTED THAT STAFF COME BACK WITH ALTERNATIVES FOR REPORTING COMPLETE MEMBERSHIP LIST WITH APPLICATIONS K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 5-21, Definitions and 5-44, Tax Imposed, Adding Sections 5-26.1 to 5-26.5 and Repealing Section 5-26 of Article II. DOgS Cats and Other Animals of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl of the Roanoke County Code to Control Dangerous and Vicious Dogs. (Kenneth Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer) 0-72793-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5 HCN SUGGESTED THAT TREASURER MIGHT COMMUNICATE WITH CITY TREASURER BEFORE PURCHASING SPECIAL DOG TAGS L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resource Board. LBE NOMINATED EDMUND KIELTY AS REGULAR MEMBER AND MRS. CHItIS PICKARD AS ALTERNATE MEMBER 2. Social Services Advisory Board. BL,T NOMINATED MARY ANDERSON TO REPRESENT THE HOLLINS M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-72793-8 1. Confirmation of Appointments to Social Services Advisory Board. A-72793-8.a 2. Resolution of Support and Endorsement of Richmond County's Resolution for Continued State Funding of Programs to Accelerate the Installation of Dry Fire 6 Hydrants. R-72793-8.b 3. Donation of Water and Sanitary Sewer Easement on Parcel A, Located on Glen Heather Drive. A-72793-8.c 4. Donation of Drainage Easement in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. A-72793-8.d N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: Advised that Rural Transuortation Planning Advisory Committee of SPDC had first meeting Tuly 14, 1993, and LBE was elected Chairman and Mr. Burge, Allegheny County Adm., Vice-Chairman. Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Advised that he worked Sat as a volunteer at the Commonwealth Games and urged continued support for the Games to be held in Roanoke. He commended Marcia Patton, P&R, and Ed Hastings, volunteer, for their efforts. (2) Thanked ECH for response to Mr. Sligh's letter, and asked for suggestions on responding to the most recent letter from Mr. Sligh. (3) Advised that he will be on vacation between now and the next board meeting, 8/24/93. Supervisor Minnix: Visited some of the precincts in his district and from information received, does not think the citizens have changed their minds and would support consolidation. Expressed his desire to cooperate with the Valley governments. O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE P. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 1, 5, AND 6 - UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance HCN REQUESTED THAT FUTURE REPORTS INCLUDE GOAL OF 6.25% IN DOLLAR AMOUNT. 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June, 1993 5. Report on Private Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program. 6. Report on Bond Projects. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To discuss specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members: (a) concerning actual litigation, namely the Grumman case; (b) concerning negotiations of a contract for the expansion of the sewage treatment plant; (c) concerning potential litigation, annexation; (d) concerning potential litigation, business license taxation; and (e) concerning pending litigation, Sigmon, Boone & Beasley cases. (3) To discuss the use of real property, namely extension of an existing 8 lease. BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 4:30 P.M. URC R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-72793-9 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AT 7:05 P.M. URC EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, by the Adoption of Certain Provisions Concerning Amateur Radio Towers in the Various Zoning Districts of the County. (Postponed from June 22, 1993) (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING BL.T AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND TO CHANGE IlVIPLEMENTATION DATE TO BE EFFECTIVE UPON SECOND READING 2ND -8/24/93 URC SIX CITIZENS SPOKE T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution Requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to Enter an Order to 9 Hold a Referendum on the Question of Changing the Method of Selection of Members of the County School Board, as Provided in Section 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as Amended. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HCN MOTION THAT RESO BE PASSED BY LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO -RULED OUT OF ORDER HCN MOTION THAT RESO BE PASSED BY -DEFEATED AYES: BL.T. HCN NAYS: EGK, LBE, FM LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO HCN SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL FIRST MEETING IN DECEMBER, 1993 -DEFEATED AYES: BL,T, HCN NAYS: EGK, LBE, FM R-72793-10 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AYES: EGK, LBE, HCN, FM NAYS: BLJ SEVEN CITIZENS SPOKE 2. Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution Approving the Funding of the Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1993-94. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) R-72793-11 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC NO CITIZENS SPOKE io 3. Public Hearing for the Consideration of Acquisition by Condemnation of Easements Across Property Owned by Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko, Charles W. Boone, and Acquisition of Property Owned by Heirs at Law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R 72793-12 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH REMOVAL OF GEORGE R & WANDA C. JANOSKO WHO HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT URC NO CITIZENS SPOKE U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Existing Church Building, Located at 3917 Old Catawba Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mason Cove Chapel. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-72793-13 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Ordinance to Rezone 0.410 Acres from R-1 to R-2 to Construct a Duplex, Located West of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Martha W. Cox. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-72783-14 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT li V. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County, by the Adoption of Certain Miscellaneous Changes Throughout the County to Said Maps (Bonsack, Cotton Hill, Poages Valley Road) (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) FM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND REFER BACK TO STAFF TO IAOK AT DENSITY AND PROTECTION OF VICWSHED PRIOR TO SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING URC LBE REQUESTED THAT STAFF VERIFY BEFORE 2ND READING THAT LESS THAN 1/8 OF REVENUE TO PAY DEBT SERVICE FOR SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR COMES FROM CONNECTION FEES TWENTY CITIZENS SPOKE W. CITIZEN CO1VIlI~NTS AND COMMU1vICATIONS NONE X. ADJOURNMENT BLJ MOTION AT 9:50 P.M. URC 12 o~ ROAN ,~.~ ti Z J a~ rasa C~~~~t~ ~# ~ ~~x~~.~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JULY 27, 1993 ~~~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Rev. Charles R. Doyle Grandin Court Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Receipt of Safety Performance Award from Virginia Municipal Liability Pool. (Margaret Nichols, Administrator) i ® Recycled Paper 2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of July 31 -August 1, 1993 as "The Battle of South Salem". D. BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing on Improvements to the C&P Telephone System. (Don Reid, Manager) 2. Quarterly Report on 1991 Water Projects. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 3. Quarterly Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities. (John Hubbard, CEO, RVRA) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Applications for Roanoke County Projects. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 2. Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Application for the River Foundation. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) 3. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement between the Town of Vinton, the City of Roanoke, and the County of Roanoke Relocating the Boundary Lines Between Said Governmental Entities. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Readoption of the Public Private Partnership Policy. (Continued from July 13, 1993) (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) 2 G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate an After School Day Care Program, Located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line. (Cliff Craig, Utility Director) 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 12-8, Adopting of State Law of Article I, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, Amusements of the Roanoke County Code. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 5-21, 3 Definitions and 5-44, Tax Imposed, Adding Sections 5-26.1 to 5-26.5 and Repealing Section 5-26 of Article II. Dogs, Cats and Other Animals of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl of the Roanoke County Code to Control Dangerous and Vicious Dogs. (Kenneth Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer) L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resource Board. 2. Social Services Advisory Board. M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII,L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Appointments to Social Services Advisory Board. 2. Resolution of Support and Endorsement of Richmond County's Resolution for Continued State Funding of Programs to Accelerate the Installation of Dry Fire Hydrants. 3. Donation of Water and Sanitary Sewer Easement on Parcel A, Located on Glen Heather Drive. 4. Donation of Drainage Easement in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. 4 N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June, 1993 5. Report on Private Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program. 6. Report on Bond Projects. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To discuss specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members: (a) concerning actual litigation, namely the Grumman case; (b) concerning negotiations of a contract for the expansion of the sewage treatment plant; (c) concerning potential litigation, annexation; and (d) concerning potential litigation, business license taxation. (3) To discuss the use of real property, namely extension of an existing lease. R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 5 EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, by the Adoption of Certain Provisions Concerning Amateur Radio Towers in the Various Zoning Districts of the County. (Postponed from June 22, 1993) (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution Requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to Enter an Order to Hold a Referendum on the Question of Changing the Method of Selection of Members of the County School Board, as Provided in Section 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as Amended. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution Approving the Funding of the Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1993-94. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) 3. Public Hearing for the Consideration of Acquisition by Condemnation of Easements Across Property Owned by Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko, Charles W. Boone, and Acquisition of Property Owned by Heirs at Law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 6 U. V. W. X. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Expand an Existing Church Building, Located at 3917 Old Catawba Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mason Cove Chapel. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 2. Ordinance to Rezone 0.410 Acres from R-1 to R-2 to Construct a Duplex, Located West of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Martha W. Cox. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County, by the Adoption of Certain Miscellaneous Changes Throughout the County to Said Maps (Bonsack, Cotton Hill, Poages Valley Road) (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT ACTION NO. ,,~~^~ ITEM NUMBER t-= AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Receipt of Safety Performance Award from Virginia Municipal Liability Pool COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Each year the Virginia Municipal Liability Pool recognizes members which have made a significant contribution to the program by reducing and controlling liability losses. Roanoke County has been selected as a recipient of the Safety Performance Award for the year ending June 30, 1992. Margaret A. Nichols, Administrator for VML Insurance Programs, will present the award to Risk Manager Robert Jernigan. Approved by, ~~ -~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens _2 e-~. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-1 DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF JIILY 31 - AIIGIIST 1, 1993, AS ~~THE BATTLE OF SOIITH SALEM~~ WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, Confederate forces, under the leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 419 in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engage- ment; and WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, on July 31 and August 1, 1993, there will be a re-enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000 spectators and 500 re-enactors and contributes to the tourism efforts of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the weekend of July 31 - August 1, 1993, as "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM", and extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by a unanimous voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: C..~ , Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF JULY 31 - AUGUST 1, 1993, AS ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH BALEM~~ WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, Confederate forces, under the leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 419 in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engage- ment; and WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, on July 31 and August 1, 1993, there will be a re-enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000 spectators and 500 re-enactors and contributes to the tourism efforts of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the weekend of July 31 - August 1, 1993, as ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM~~, and extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event. ~~~~ ~~ -~: AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-2 OF APPRECIATION TO RETA R. BIISHER FOR HER BERVICEB TO ROANORE COUNTY FROM 1984-1993 WHEREAS, Reta Busher has worked for Roanoke County since September, 1984, beginning her career as a budget analyst, and rising to the position of Director of Management and Budget; and WHEREAS, Ms. Busher has accepted a position as Director of Management and Budget of Henrico County, and will be leaving Roanoke County on August 20, 1993; and WHEREAS, during her time with Roanoke County, Ms. Busher has been involved in a variety of issues and events of importance to the County, including the All America City Presentation, the consolidation issue, and the bond referendums of 1985, 1986 and 1992; and WHEREAS, throughout her career, Ms. Busher has been a valuable and dedicated employee of Roanoke County, and she will be missed by the Board and the staff; and WHEREAS, Ms. Busher also expended time and energy for the betterment of the entire Roanoke Valley, particularly through her work with TRUST, the Jaycees, and the Regional Chamber of Commerce. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, extends its appreciation to RETA R. BIISHER for the dedication and service which she has provided to the Board, the citizens and the staff of Roanoke County; and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Ms. Busher as she assumes her new position in Henrico County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on Improvements in C&P Telephone System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Don Reid, Manager, has requested an opportunity to brief the Board on improvements being planned by C&P Telephone Company. The plans include elimination of long distance charges currently being incurred by some areas of the Roanoke Valley. Appro _ d by, Gs~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: July Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir is now in its twentieth month and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last month included: ° Completed dental concrete on foundation ° Completed quarry and crushing operation ° Continued RCC dam construction - now 233 feet high ° Continued concrete and piping placement for river pump station The current project contract total costs including existing and pending change orders is $25,044,000. This cost remains unchanged from the previous report. Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $19,361,765.54 and $1,316,991.61 for engineering construction phase services. During the next month, the contractor will perform the following: ° Complete construction of RCC Dam ° Continue pump station piping and pump control room construction ° Begin remaining intake tower construction ° Begin remaining tree removal. WATER TREATMENT PLANT The Water Treatment Plant continues in the design phase. Activity during the last month included: ° Final design of process facilities and details ° Plans and operational data are currently under review by the County and State. f ~ J~J . , ~~i/ ~° The pilot water treatment plant was not operated last month and remains on standby. The plant will only be operated if the Health Department requests additional specific operating data or demonstration of treatment processes. During the next month, staff will perform the following: ° Obtain additional borings at site for specific foundation design ° Complete work with consultants on Process Control/Display System ° Complete work on construction plan details for process units ° Complete work on process equipment specifications. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work continues on the Water Transmission Line: ° Title certification ° Easement negotiation ° Obtaining easements ° Preparation of construction drawings Work will continue on acquisition of easements during the next month. SUBMITTED BY: (~` x ~1~ Q~`~~r- ~`~1'.1~ cap Clifford; P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: gym......' ~~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Minnix Johnson Kohinke Eddy Nickens .~ ACTION #. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Tuesday, July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Construction of the transfer station, Smith Gap facilities and the rail components continue to progress. The rail spur should be operational by mid August for delivery of stone for construction of the landfill liner system. Crushing of the on-site shale material is underway. The rail car dumper is on-site and is being assembled. Completion of the dumper is expected by late August. Additional work has been required to the erosion and sediment control facilities due to recent heavy rains in the Bradshaw area. Improvements have been made in the past several weeks. The County continues to work closely with the Resource Authority in addressing the deficiencies, while maintaining progress on the project. The Part B permit has been approved by the Department of Environmental Quality. The project is expected to be operational by the end of November. Attached is a project update presented to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority at its regular meeting held July 15, 1993. Respectfully submitted: John R. Hubbard Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Approved Denied Received Ref erred to Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens s `~ " .~ MEETING: July 15, 1993 PROJECT: Master Schedule STATUS: Substantial progress is being made in most all areas of the project. Some delays have been experienced on the tipper building. Below is a brief description of the progress on each portion of the work. Smith Gay: Part B Approval: The Department of Environmental Quality has approved the permit. . Rough Grading: Progress continues to be good. Approximately 83 is complete. Completion is expected by the end of August. . Tipper Station: Concrete and ground work continue to dominate the activity. The rotary dumper has been delivered and is being assembled. The metal structure for the maintenance building has been delivered. . Monitoring Wells: The second quarter samples will be taken this month. . Landfill Liner: Contracts have been awarded and the contractor has moved some equipment to the site. Shale crushing will begin by July 15. . Utilities: The contractor has delivered materials to the site, however, has not begun installation. Transfer Station . Building: Excellent progress and effort is being made. ~R Rail Transportation: Masonry work is visible on the office and transfer building. Final grading and rail work is progressing. . Rail Spur: Grading is near completion. Track is being installed in the rail yard and main line. The spur should be operational by August 10. . Stone Track: .Rail Cars: . Car Dumpers: Equipment: . Heavy Machinery: Schedule: Rail is being installed along with unloading azea. Cars and lids aze being constructed and will be delivered in August and September. The dumper is being delivered and assembled. Installation will take 45 days. All heavy equipment has been bid and awards made. Delivery is expected by October. The system is expected to be operational by the end of November pending no major delays. Attached is a summary of the project schedule and status. Respectfully submitted: ohn R. Hubbard, P.E. Chief Executive Officer ~. PROJECT STATUS ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY MASTER SCHEDULE ..t.J SCHEDULE 1992 1993 % J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C O E A E A P A U U U E C 0 E 0 N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C M U R C 1 E Y U T 0 E E U R C I E Y U T O E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R I LANDFILL RAIL TRANSPORT 80 ur Rail S P 30 Rail Cars 0 6 r um er Ca D p BOND PROCEEDS ONLY FINANCIAL STATUS COMPONENT ESTIMATED COSTS ACTUAL TO DATE % TOTAL Landfill $12,046,204 52,294,534 19°k Transfer 6,297,614 S 1,781,666 28% Transportation 9.000.000 -0- 0% TOTAL 527,343,818 54,076,200 15°i6 6/93 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-3 APPROVING THE SIIBMISSION OF FIVB ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS. BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting five transportation enhancement project applications and has reviewed and prioritized the applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish the following improvement projects: Green Hill Park, with priority #1 Vinyard Park, with priority #2 Goode Park Trail, with priority #3 Starkey/Shell Park, with priority #4 Roadside Dumps, with priority #5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for planning and design, right-of-way, and construction of these projects, and that, if the County of Roanoke, Virginia subsequently elects to cancel this project, the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total ~, ,: amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget John C. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Commonwealth Transporation Board 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E ~ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE• July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program applications COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: v' iGc-~'~,arLL~,n. /7~f .,fit; cLr1 c~,~~' ,~Z mow"` ~~~ ,~~ cw.. r/~ ,~ Zs.4-. ~~ BACKGROUND• The federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was signed into law December 1991. One part of ISTEA provides that 10% of a state's Surface Transportation Program funds be directed towards transportation projects that enhance the physical environment and go beyond the normal elements of a transportation improvement project. In Virginia, that amounts to about $7 million a year through 1996. Transportation enhancement activities must relate to the intermodal transportation system in function, proximity, or impact. Eligible activities must fall into one or more of ten categories defined by federal legislation, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, historic or scenic preservation activities, beautification, rails- to-trails programs, and mitigation of pollution due to highway run- off. Up to 80% of a transportation enhancement project can be financed with these funds. A minimum of 20% must come from other public or private sources. According to VDOT, a project will either be funded or it will not. A project will not be partially funded unless the locality requests phased funding. Enhancement projects may be initiated by any group or individual but must be formally endorsed by the local government. Projects that are within a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) also require endorsement of the MPO. The county's applications and rankings were endorsed by the Transportation Technical Committee, an advisory committee to the MPO, on July 8, 1993. They will be forwarded to the MPO for endorsement on July 22. .c~" - / 2 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Five projects are proposed by the staff. The projects were evaluated and ranked by staff of the departments of Planning and Zoning, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, and Economic Development using the Enhancement Program's project selection criteria. The project that, in the staff's opinion, appeared to the meet the most criteria was ranked the highest. A summary of the projects and rankings is attached. Other projects that were identified and discussed for the program included Williamson Road improvement project, Dry Hollow Road reservoir overlook, YMCA camp, trails at the landfill, greenway plans, and bicycle trails/routes. These projects were not included in this round of applications due to necessary review times. The next application deadline in April 1, 1994. Staff intends to identify eligible activities and pursue funding through this program. FISCAL IMPACT' The total project cost for the five projects is $246,500. If all five applications are awarded ISTEA funds, the minimum 20% match required is $49,200. By formally endorsing an enhancement project, the County will also be responsible for cost overruns. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: That the board endorse by resolution the project applications and their rankings. Respectfully Submitted, / / ~. Lyn `' onihe Associate Planner Approved, ~~ D{ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Vote Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens No Yes Abs ~" """ ROANOKE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS Rankinci Project Summarv #1 Green Hill Park Develop a trail that encompasses the perimeter of the park, including self-guiding interpretive trail through different types of habitats that exist in the park. Provide fishing access to Roanoke River for able bodied and disabled patrons. Provide foot paths and pedestrian bridges for observing nature, for access to Roanoke River and for easier access to other amenities in the park. Total cost: $25,500 Match: $5,000 #2 Vinyard Park Develop a trail that runs from the upper reaches of the park, along a stocked trout stream, and connects with two park sites down stream. Increase accessibility of existing athletic fields and enhance safe pedestrian access to events within the parks. Total cost: $25,000 Match: $5,000 (When the applications were reviewed, the relocation of the Battle of Hanging Rock historic marker was ranked #3. This application has since been pulled due to negotiations with a landowner and private sponsors. The application will be resubmitted for the next round. Rankings have been adjusted.) #3 Goode Park Trail Develop trails along existing 3/4 mile greenway between two County parks to provide park users with pedestrian access to recreation opportunities in both parks. Total cost: $4000 Match: $800 #4 Starkey/Shell Park Provide bicycle and pedestrian access between two County parks and an elementary school, increasing access to new "fully accessible playground". Expand existing walking/jogging trails through area. Total cost: $12,000 Match: $2,400 #5 Roadside Dumps Cleanup of five "publicly used" roadside dumps in Roanoke County to enhance aesthetic and ecological resources along the public roadway. Stabilize banks, restore vegetation, and erect barriers to restrict future access to dumpers. Total cost: $180,000 Match: $36,000 ~'"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF FIVE ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS. BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting five transportation enhancement project applications and has reviewed and prioritized the applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish the following improvement projects: Green Hill Park, with priority #1 Vinyard Park, with priority #2 Goode Park Trail, with priority #3 Starkey/Shell Park, with priority #4 Roadside Dumps, with priority #5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for planning and design, right-of-way, and construction of these projects, and that, if the County of Roanoke, Virginia subsequently elects to cancel this project, the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total C-~/ amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancelation. ~ r " ~; AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-4 ENDORSING THE SIIBMISSION OF AN ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION BY THE RIVER FOUNDATION WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the improvement of a light vehicle and pedestrian wooden bridge at the Explore Park; and 2. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for planning and design, right-of-way and construction of this project, up to a maximum of $50,000 which was approved for Explore Park capital expenses by the Board of Supervisors in their fiscal year 1993-94 budget; and 3. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia will not be held responsible for additional funds beyond that amount; and 4. That by letter dated July 22, 1993, the River Foundation agrees to be responsible for cost overruns associated with the projects, and if the River Foundation subsequently elects to cancel this project, the River Foundation agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~~~~ Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Richard Burrow, The River Foundation Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget Commonwealth Transportation Board I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 72793-4 endorsing the submission of an ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Application by the River Foundation adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. 1 Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE' AGENDA ITEM' Request for Approval to Submit ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program application for The River Foundation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ G (~~~/]nrti BACKGROUND' The federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was signed into law December 1991. One part of ISTEA provides that 10% of a state's Surface Transportation Program funds be directed towards transportation projects that enhance the physical environment and go beyond the normal elements of a transportation improvement project. In Virginia, that amounts to about $7 million a year through 1996. Transportation enhancement activities must relate to the intermodal transportation system in function, proximity, or impact. Eligible activities must fall into one or more of ten categories defined by federal legislation, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, historic or scenic preservation activities, beautification, rails- to-trails programs, and mitigation of pollution due to highway run- off . Up to 80% of a transportation enhancement project can be financed with these funds. A minimum of 20% must come from other public or private sources. According to VDOT, a project will either be funded or it will not. A project will not be partially funded unless the locality requests phased funding. Enhancement projects may be initiated by any group or individual but must be formally endorsed by the local government. Projects that are within a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) also require endorsement by the appropriate MPO. "`"- .~. 2 SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: The River Foundation application is to construct a light vehicle and pedestrian wooden bridge across a ravine dissecting the park's entry road and parking areas from the 1750-1850 historic settlement area. The bridge is the primary pedestrian link between proposed parking areas, the environmental education center, and the historic settlement. The wooden structure will be approximately 230 feet in length, 10 feet wide, and 60 feet high. FISCAL IMPACT' The total project cost is $250,000. Of this, $30,000 is for planning and design and $220,000 is for construction and implementation. In the 1993-94 budget, the Board approved funding of $100,000 for EXPLORE. $50,000 was to be used for operating expenses, and $50,000 was earmarked for capital expenses for construction within the EXPLORE Park. The capital funds were contingent upon 3 to 1 matching funds in new money. The River Foundation intends to use the $50, 000 as the matching funds for the ISTEA grant (4 to 1 match). The River Foundation has agreed to hold respect to cost overruns associated reimbursement of VDOT expenditures if th STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: the County harmless with with the project and e project is canceled. That the board endorse by resolution the project application for The River Foundation. Respectfully Submitted, ~, Ly Donihe Associate Planner Approved, Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens vote No Yes Abs ~-- _---s...~ ~., , An outdoor classroom and living bzstory museum enabling visitors to learn about the land wildlife, and early American civilizations through a diversity of experierues at the: • American Center for Race and Endangered Species • The F,nvironmental Education Center of Virginia • American Wilderness Pack • Native American Parr • Blue Ridge Town Administered by Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code 810.1-1600 et. seq. L. H. Hamlar, Chairman in partnership with The River Foundation I. R. C. 8501 (c) (3) Joseph E. Stephenson, President 101 South Jefferson Street Sixth Floor Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1 31 1 (703) 345-1295 Fax: (703) 345-6031 July 22, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: ISTEA Application Enhancement Project for Virginia's Explore Park Dear l~r. Hodge: Under separate cover, The River Foundation staff is forvaardinl; to Roanoke County an application for Virginia's Explore, Park's Enhancement Project under the Federal ISTEA Program. if you would include this application for tl~e park's "light vehicle anal pedestrian ~NOOdE?t1 bridge" 011 the Board of Supervisors' agenda on July 2 7, 1993, it would be greatly- appreciated. Since this application potentially taps federal higl~it,•vay aundirtg„ the County of Roanoke will ~be asked to review and app~`o~re this projec' in a manner similar to all other highway projects. The P,iveT Foundation is the financial source for this application and the Foundation ~~~ouid like to clarify its intentions on two financial matters which should help make the County's review of the basic applicati~m easier. Firstly, Roanoke County must approve a resolution endorsing the Enhancement Project ar~~d agreeing to reimburse VDOT for any expenses VDOT may incur i.f the project is approved by the Transportation. Board but never built. If this project is approved by VDC-T, The River Foundation certainly intends to build t}ie bridge as soon as possible, hopefully for use by the May, 7 994 opening. The River Foundation fully agrees to reimburse VDOT for any expenses VDC)T may incur should the bridge project be approved but never built. Secondly, as a part of the application process, R<~ani>ke County must agree to be responsible for all cost overruns that may occur aboee the $250,000 estimated project cost Tl1e River Foundation also agrees to fully cover the cost of all overruns about: the estimated 8230,000 for the wooden bridge project. The County should. not bear this cost. ~~ Letter to Elmer Hodge July 22, 1993 Page 2 Thank you again for all the support Roanoke County has given to Virginia's Explore Park. Those of us involved in the project hope the Board of Supervisors and County staff are content with the wooden bridge proposed as the project to use the County's $50,000 grant set aside for construction within the park. The 4-to-1 match that is a part of the Enhancement Program process snakes the wooden bridge connecting the entry road and parking areas with the historic settlement a good candidate project. Thank you for your consideration of this important project within Explore Park. Very truly y u s, ~ C - George .Cartledge, r. Secretary/Treasurer GBC, Sr. / pkl "'. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT RIVER FOUNDATION SUBMI83ION OF AN ISTEA PROGRAM APPLICATION BY THE WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the improvement of a light vehicle and pedestrian wooden bridge at the Explore Park; and 2. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for planning and design, right-of-way and construction of this project, up to a maximum of $50,000 which was approved for Explore Park capital expenses by the Board of Supervisors in their fiscal year 1993-94 budget; and 3. That the County of Roanoke, Virginia will not be held responsible for additional funds beyond that amount; and 4. That by letter dated July 22, 1993, the River Foundation agrees to be responsible for cost overruns associated with the projects, and if the River Foundation subsequently elects to cancel this project, the River Foundation agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs .. expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. L- ~' . __ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-5 AIITHORIZING THE E%ECIITION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VINTON, THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE RELOCATING THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN BAID GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, AND AIITHORIZING THAT CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS RELATING TO SIICH BOUNDARY LINE BE TAKEN AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 24, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the governing bodies of the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, and Town of Vinton desire to petition the Court for approval to relocate portions of the boundary line between the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the relocation of the boundary line of such governmental entities in the areas proposed will permit more effective and efficient delivery of municipal services and promote the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the City and the Town have adopted measures reflecting their desires to relocate and change a portion of the boundary line between the County, City and Town as requested by certain property owners within said areas; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vinton and City of Roanoke have agreed to the boundary relocation by action of their respective governing bodies. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: 1. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Roanoke, the t r Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke, in form approved by the County Attorney, establishing a new boundary line at certain points between said jurisdictions as more particularly described in the plat showing a boundary map line adjustment Area I containing 33.80 acres and plat showing boundary map line adjustment Area II, between the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke, all of which is incorporated by reference herein. 2. The boundary line set forth in said agreement shall be described by metes and bounds. 3. Upon the agreement being duly executed by the Mayor for Roanoke City, the Mayor of the Town of Vinton, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors for the County of Roanoke, said executions to be authorized by appropriate measures passed by the respective jurisdictions, the description of such aforesaid boundary line will be duly published as required by §15.1-1031.2 of the State Code. 4. Upon execution of the agreement between the governing bodies and publication of the agreed upon relocation boundary line in accordance with law, the County Attorney is authorized to petition the Circuit Court of one of the affected jurisdictions to relocate the boundary line in accordance with the plats and the agreement. 5. Upon entry of an order by the Circuit Court establishing the new boundary line, a certified copy of such order shall be forwarded to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. 6. The County Administrator and County Attorney are authorized to take, or cause to be taken, such other actions, and 2 to execute other documents as may be required by law to effect the change in the boundary line as set forth herein. 7. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Town Clerk of the Town of Vinton and the City Clerk of the City of Roanoke. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~, Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VINTON, THE CITY OF ROANOKE AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE RELOCATING THE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SAID GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THAT CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS RELATING TO SUCH BOUNDARY LINE BE TAKEN AS PROVIDED BY LAW COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : G~~ c~ i~ry~~"~' l u EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This Resolution authorizes the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to execute on behalf of the County an agreement to relocate the boundary line between the Town of Vinton, the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke. BACKGROUND• For approximately one year, County staff has been working with the staffs of the Town and City to relocate the boundary line between the respective jurisdictions. The County Attorney's office has prepared the Agreement and the Petition to Relocate for submission to the Circuit Court. The Office of the City Engineer has prepared the plats and the metes and bounds description. The City Attorney's office is preparing the required legal publication. The procedure followed is established in Article 2, Chapter 24, Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia. Over the past seven years the County has followed this procedure to relocate the boundary line between the County and Floyd County, and between the County and the City of Salem. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This resolution authorizes the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to execute an agreement on behalf of the County with the Mayors of the Town of Vinton and the City of Roanoke to relocate the boundary line between the respective governmental entities. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VINTON, THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE RELOCATING THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN SAID GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THAT CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS RELATING TO SUCH BOUNDARY LINE BE TAKEN AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 24, Title 15.1, 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the governing bodies of the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, and Town of Vinton desire to petition the Court for approval to relocate portions of the boundary line between the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the relocation of the boundary line of such governmental entities in the areas proposed will permit more effective and efficient delivery of municipal services and promote the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the City and the Town have adopted measures reflecting their desires to relocate and change a portion of the boundary line between the County, City and Town as requested by certain property owners within said areas; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vinton and City of Roanoke have agreed to the boundary relocation by action of their respective governing bodies. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that: -.3 1. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke, in form approved by the County Attorney, establishing a new boundary line at certain points between said jurisdictions as more particularly described in the plat showing a boundary map line adjustment Area I containing 33.80 acres and plat showing boundary map line adjustment Area II, between the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke, all of which is incorporated by reference herein. 2. The boundary line set forth in said agreement shall be described by metes and bounds. 3. Upon the agreement being duly executed by the Mayor for Roanoke City, the Mayor of the Town of Vinton, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors for the County of Roanoke, said executions to be authorized by appropriate measures passed by the respective jurisdictions, the description of such aforesaid boundary line will be duly published as required by §15.1-1031.2 of the State Code. 4. Upon execution of the agreement between the governing bodies and publication of the agreed upon relocation boundary line in accordance with law, the County Attorney is authorized to petition the Circuit Court of one of the affected jurisdictions to relocate the boundary line in accordance with the plats and the agreement. 5. Upon entry of an order by the Circuit Court establishing the new boundary line, a certified copy of such order shall be forwarded to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. 2 "'~ 6. The County Administrator and County Attorney are authorized to take, or cause to be taken, such other actions, and to execute other documents as may be required by law to effect the change in the boundary line as set forth herein. 7. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Town Clerk of the Town of Vinton and the City Clerk of the City of Roanoke. c:\wp51 \agenda\reales[\boundary. res 3 4 r + f "" ~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVI8OR8 OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION 72793-6 READOPTING A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY FOR ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the expenditure of public funds for the general purpose of promoting Roanoke County's commercial, industrial, and business development is a lawful, valid, public purpose; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 81286-169 authorizes the payment of a portion of the total water connection fee by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, for certain commercial or industrial projects which are determined to be in the best interests of the County's economic development and which generate significant employment; and, WHEREAS, Resolution 22790-1 adopted a broader public private partnership policy for encouraging economic development in Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, modification of this policy to establish revised guidelines and criteria will prove beneficial in determining the scope of local incentives in the negotiations for economic development projects. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the Board hereby readopt and establish the following "Roanoke County Public Private Partnership Policy" in order to provide policy criteria and guidance in applying the provisions of the Roanoke County Code in negotiations concerning local incentives for economic development projects. 1 ROANORE COIINTY PIIBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY Purposes: 1. Roanoke County may fund part of site development costs for public improvements, roads, and off site facility fees for water and sewer for a qualifying industry or business that meets the evaluation criteria for public private (P/P) partnerships. 2 . Roanoke County may encourage the creation or retention of jobs of qualifying companies within the community which employ a significant number of employees through assistance with employment training. 3. Roanoke County may support tourism related industry/ destination activities that provide a range of attractions for visitors from outside the Roanoke Valley. Applications• A business or industry may apply for County assistance by addressing a letter to the Director of Economic Development that indicates: a. a description of the business or tourism activity to be conducted on the site b. total capital investment in real estate (land, building) machinery and tools and anticipated personal property and/or other taxes paid on site c. total employment and annual payroll and jobs to be created or retained d. specific water and sewer needs (i.e., size line and/or capacity) or other public facility assistance required e. date of construction and/or start-up (if in an existing building) f. if applicable, the terms of any lease to ensure that the company will occupy the building during the period calculated for payback. Review• The Director of Economic Development, upon consultation with the County Administrator and other County staff, will review the request for participation to determine the extent of Roanoke County's funding. An evaluation method based on anticipated taxes (real estate, machinery and tools and personal property), payback, 2 number and type of employees, likelihood of future growth, and other factors will be used. The County may participate in up to 50~ of public improvement costs of the project if payback occurs within the first three years of the new project. Participation in projects with paybacks longer than three years shall be a reduced level. All applications are subject to restrictions by the amount of the County's budget appropriation for this purpose. Areas of Partnership Assistance• 1. Physical improvements and fees: If approved, Roanoke County may fund part of; a, water and sewer line extensions b. water, fire, and sewer utility connection fees c. public road construction and required drainage structures d. traffic control devices such as signals and related equipment e. employment training/retraining Requests for assistance with employment training and retraining of new and/or relocated employees may be considered. Amounts and priority of funding will depend on the salary/wage rate to be paid, the number of permanent full time jobs created, relocated or retained, and availability of matching funds from the state of Virginia and federal funds. County training funds will not be directly paid to a company, but will be appropriated to a training agency, state agency or economic development organization recognized by the Board of Supervisors. 2. Criteria for determination: a. No projects will be considered which are determined to produce significant environmental pollution, public nuisance or excessive demands for local public services. b. Excess County payments under the Public Private Partnership Policy will be refunded by the applicant if actual tax revenues do not meet the above criteria. c. All applications for payments of costs for physical improvements and/or fees which comply with the above criteria will be approved by the County Administrator upon the recommendation of the Director of Economic 3 Development. d. Applications which fall outside the criteria stated above, but which are considered by the County Administrator and Director of Economic Development to have merit, will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. e. Tourism projects will be evaluated on the basis of expected visitation and concentration of tourism activities in areas proposed by the Economic Development Strategy, as well as other criteria for new jobs and anticipated tax revenues. f. Public Private Partnership funds shall be paid after the approval of the required site plan and at the time that a building permit is issued for the project. Industrial Park Development Off-site fees of jointly developed parks shall not be held as a portion of the total cost of the project and thus not a portion of the payback equation. Such assistance shall be funded after the approval of the required site plan and at the time a building permit is issued for the project. Limitations• Roanoke County will not pay for any private sewage pre-treatment facilities or waive any ordinances requiring fire protection or industrial discharge certification. Funding Sources: Roanoke County shall fund its participation from the General Fund from anticipated tax revenue, or from an Economic Development Fund or other special non-utility funds. There is an intent to continue the maintenance of a fiscally sound utility enterprise fund to provide water and sewer service to County utility customers. (This provision is authorized by County Code Chapter 22 as amended by Ordinance 8-12-86-169, Section 3b.) Agreement• A written agreement on a form approved by the County Attorney will be required to specify terms of each Public Private Partnership. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 4 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~Z-~~"-'' Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development 5 Item No . '~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Readoption of Public Private Partnership Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: 7`f,~~~~ ~t.c-~<cn-rte. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a Public Private Partnership Policy by Resolution (22790-1) on February 27, 1990. Since the development of this program, County economic development staff have used this program to assist twelve (12) projects in Roanoke County. A total of $224,349 has been expended in retaining or creating 648 jobs and resulting in an estimated $14.5 million of new private investment in Roanoke County. Funds have been used for public purposes; typically, water and sewer extensions, utility, connection fees, and traffic control equipment. The initial policy's emphasis has been aimed at manufacturing and major employers. During the past year, a variety of prospects have sought a Roanoke County location. The trend and type of prospects that have recently inquired about a Roanoke County location are both non-manufacturing and local Valley companies that are expanding. The staff's analysis supports an expansion of the Public Private Partnership to include non-manufacturing companies, tourism related industries and activities and employment training. Evaluation criteria based on new taxes, employment, payback, and other factors will be used to review applicants for assistance. The readopted Public Private Partnership Policy proposes that Roanoke County participate up to 50% of eligible costs for public improvements if payback from new taxes occurs within the first three years of the new project. This level of participation meets the intent of the partnership concept and provides funding opportunities for more partnerships. f FISCAL IMPACT: Currently, $147,704.50 is available in the Economic Development Fund for an allocation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors readopt the Public Private Partnership Policy by the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted: ~--~ ~ ~~ ; ~~ ~~ ~ i. Timothy W. Gub la, Director Department of Economic Development Approved: .~~~: E mer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION READOPTING A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the expenditure of public funds for the general purpose of promoting Roanoke County's commercial, industrial, and business development is a lawful, valid, public purpose; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 81286-169 authorizes the payment of a portion of the total water connection fee by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, for certain commercial or industrial projects which are determined to be in the best interests of the County's economic development and which generate significant employment; and, WHEREAS, Resolution 22790-1 adopted a broader public private partnership policy for encouraging economic development in Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, modification of this policy to establish revised guidelines and criteria will prove beneficial in determining the scope of local incentives in the negotiations for economic development projects. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the Board hereby readopt and establish the following "Roanoke County Public Private Partnership Policy" in order to provide policy criteria and guidance in applying the provisions of the Roanoke County Code in negotiations concerning local incentives for economic development projects. /- ..,.. ROANORE COUNTY PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY Purposes• 1. Roanoke County may fund part of site development costs for public improvements, roads, and off site facility fees for water and sewer for a qualifying industry or business that meets the evaluation criteria for public private (P/P) partnerships. 2. Roanoke County may encourage the creation or retention of jobs of qualifying companies within the community which employ a significant number of employees through assistance with employment training. 3. Roanoke County may support tourism related industry/ destination activities that provide a range of attractions for visitors from outside the Roanoke Valley. Applications: A business or industry may apply for County assistance by addressing a letter to the Director of Economic Development that indicates: a. a description of the business or tourism activity to be conducted on the site b. total capital investment in real estate (land, building) machinery and tools and anticipated personal property and/or other taxes paid on site c. total employment and annual payroll and jobs to be created or retained d. e. f. Review• specific water and sewer needs (i.e., size line and/or capacity) or other public facility assistance required date of construction and/or start-up (if in an existing building) if applicable, the terms of any lease to ensure that the company will occupy the building during the period calculated for payback. The Director of Economic Development, upon consultation with the County Administrator and other County staff, will review the request for participation to determine the extent of Roanoke County's funding. An evaluation method based on anticipated taxes (real estate, machinery and tools and personal property), payback, number and type of employees, likelihood of future growth, and other factors will be used. The County may participate in up to ~, 50% of public improvement costs of the project if payback occurs within the first three years of the new project. Participation in projects with paybacks longer than three years shall be a reduced level. All applications are subject to restrictions by the amount of the County's budget appropriation for this purpose. Areas of Partnership Assistance• 1. Physical improvements and fees: If approved, Roanoke County may fund part of; a. water and sewer line extensions b. water, fire, and sewer utility connection fees c. public road construction and required drainage structures d. traffic control devices such as signals and related equipment e. employment training/retraining Requests for assistance with employment training and retraining of new and/or relocated employees may be considered. Amounts and priority of funding will depend on the salary/wage rate to be paid, the number of permanent full time jobs created, relocated or retained, and availability of matching funds from the state of Virginia and federal funds. County training funds will not be directly paid to a company, but will be appropriated to a training agency, state agency or economic development organization recognized by the Board of Supervisors. 2. Criteria for determination: a. No projects will be considered which are determined to produce significant environmental pollution, public nuisance or excessive demands for local public services. b. Excess County payments under the Public Private Partnership Policy will be refunded by the applicant if actual tax revenues do not meet the above criteria. c. All applications for payments of costs for physical improvements and/or fees which comply with the above criteria will be approved by the County Administrator upon the recommendation of the Director of Economic Development. 2 ~~ l d. Applications which fall outside the criteria stated above, but which are considered by the County Administrator and Director of Economic Development to have merit, will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. e. Tourism projects will be evaluated on the basis of expected visitation and concentration of tourism activities in areas proposed by the Economic Development Strategy, as well as other criteria for new jobs and anticipated tax revenues. f. Public Private Partnership funds shall be paid after the approval of the required site plan and at the time that a building permit is issued for the project. Industrial Park Development Off-site fees of jointly developed parks shall not be held as a portion of the total cost of the project and thus not a portion of the payback equation. Such assistance shall be funded after the approval of the required site plan and at the time a building permit is issued for the project. Limitations• Roanoke County will not pay for any private sewage pre-treatment facilities or waive any ordinances requiring fire protection or industrial discharge certification. Funding Sources• Roanoke County shall fund its participation from the General Fund from anticipated tax revenue, or from an Economic Development Fund or other special non-utility funds. There is an intent to continue the maintenance of a fiscally sound utility enterprise fund to provide water and sewer service to County utility customers. (This provision is authorized by County Code Chapter 22 as amended by Ordinance 8-12-86-169, Section 3b.) Agreement: A written agreement on a form approved by the County Attorney will be required to specify terms of each Public Private Partnership. 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ""'~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for August 24, 1993. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate an after school day care program, located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 24, 1993. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item 1, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~'~ , Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date receive C~ received by; applica ion feoe~ B A ~aJte: placards i ued: BO d 'te: G Case Nu ber: / ~~, L/ 7~ Check type of application fil d (check all that apply): ~',~, ~ REZONING SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: I f -~~ f OTC }jq~};~~ ~cirC~ ~ ('l,t 5}-e.e.5 Phone: ~(eL~ ~~~ 31 Address: 35x0 fie.+ers (,'~e~k I~ioo.r,~- }~l~/ ~~0..nokZ , vg zip Code: a~ol4 Owner's name: (~(~~(rOSZ ~~~i5~- V'1~~G~ Phone:3~e(D (2(Dv~ -~ r',/j Address: ~SaO~e,{-cr's CJ`ezk I~Sd. N~ ~v4d1C~c VI's Zi Code: p a `~di~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: '~ 7, t O - ~ -. ZZ 35 a o ~~.~~~s ~,rcck {~d , N~1 Magisterial District: d-~-A,,,,{~ ~ , }~oQ,no~Se l 1~ (~ a4 0 19 Community Planning Area: P ~~Q; Cx.a~~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R "' 2- = `p,' acres Existing Land Use: R ELr~,o,,~ ,O.tr~rr~s~..~ sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: ~'~'' ............................. For staff use o~iy n~`` /1~ Proposed Land Use: -{-o I ~n Cl t,~cl e, Ctrl A T-t..e~'. ~5'ch~ ( J0.y LLt.r-L Use Type: Does the arcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES / NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ._.. .. ...- . ..... .. .. ... ......... .............. Variance Section(s) - - of the Roanoke Count ZoR y g Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application `.~ .<.,. Metes and bounds description //9 <:: Proffers, if applicable Justification rYt} Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and conyseyn~t of the owner. Owner's Signature: (,~~~;~/ / I~%~~ For Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant /' (2~ ~'O~er ~Q~OTiS~ ~rC~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 1 Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. /Irvf ~1i~.61e. ~1i,5 ~egc~esf We'll /Job in~)pae~ Sce~rvc.</~d~~ ~ro/Oer~ies as ~he ~ro~ra~ ul;ll ~e lvec~}ecL i., ~,lrcac~y ~xisli-~~ ~G-l;~i-es of the /~fe%se. /'~ /I ,, / i s ~v ~,~e,r~ v~ GL. l~r e, ~Da rC e~ off' ~Q~C( Q~ /~c~~'Sf C~1lirCGl . l h/ C ~urC~j ~'1 e, ~/`O~rQ,~y~ bfli-l! ~~ ~ ovl 77 /12~t 7D ~i S ~Q~C~ ~. c~° C- /vv ~ ~r' 7`L«>~~~ i~ ~orma~iJn - Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Dui er,~,~h ~~ chu~cGl ~/ ~~t,-~ /.~ /v c~e~ ~v; {f--~~, ~. {r~~s~ ~~~~,Q/ /a~,d ~ s ~ ('~P~ol`y. ll-%s is ~ c C'~2.fCG~vrc/ i~1 lv~iiCLr CGJccrClt QyIGLi C(2c, C<zrL Ced]~S QJ'c. enCo u ras{G{ . Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~-, rC/I~'rJc. of Vie. r`e.9li~sf w: ll ~~mPac;{- ~e ~ro~J°r~.j 6y ~(a,/y ccse o~ QI read y ex~~ fi ~~ lac, l,~fi-e s as oPposecC ~o ~; ~ee~/y r~sc. Lf ~; l1 reg~,; ~o ~o ~ e~ co~k~h~. o~ add,froha.l ~aerl,'-h-es. ~1e- ~ograrrt connns;s/5 of ~~~- ~tov1 C~~ ~- e%e~,~an/ ~l~~-u--alc~f~ ~cs~ 5. /~ nt~(3Qino v~u~i~.c~{d S~eJr~iS~`D~ ~r`oM ~~. h~us ~~ ap~n-~P/~ /~1oh. ~h/•u /';: ~o%lv~~ ~ ~e~~ `~12 ~oano~~ l~ . ~~c;Gloo/ Cale~l day, ~2 arc r-eques~i~~lc~ Ii-cer~~'~~,,)~ /'a~-- 4p ~a Y~ e~~lclr~v1, w;l( fie, ~~`~ h,~c~ a~~.l~ pcr5or~ne~ ~o s~per-v~ se./ ~1e ~r/d~eti. ~~ ~z. rece~/- Qdc~;ltvh o~ Par~,-n~ spaces ~o ~e im,he d r'a,~ Q ~eQ ~ ~c ~-o 0,5 e Gt ~e~ S-~j oo/ ~Oro~~ar~ ~X~3/i~~ ~rk~ w:ll hc. ade9~~c, There. ~/; l( be ade9u~er Space, -tor Eck o~ ehild~wl w~i/cGt w.l~a~ %/1fer~et'~, v~%~1 Wec~vtesd~ ni ti~ ~urC~j a~r•~,-~i-CS ~1%J pro~rcrvt~ i,/-// naf' be i~1 er7"eCx- ola~.~ e5(`,rioo/ ~DLrs/ So 7-ner'(, 'WWII be ~o t'w~~~ 0~1 .sctiac~/s, -The " f~ro~ravn W~ ~ ~ ~e ma~n~-a~nerl pole I c~ the" CG~u~-c~~ ~rou~~S ~ ,so no i~/~ae~ ors ,n .~ Q(~Jv; ~~~ 1" rOper~,'es or Coc,o~ ~ Pars 4~ reCe~ca~i~o~ ~G 1,-fi~es Q~~ Qh ~i~c,~a~ep~. -Tran.s,~or~a~ion ~-o ~-he. ~-ac~ l,~ ~M Sal~oo/ u/o~e~~Je_ 6y eoliv~~ ~eloal bus ~'on~ ~le.h ~ovL ~~ec~e~7-an~ ~~loo( ~~- ~C;l,'~ is wi~i~ Tie ~le~ ~o/e ~~~~~ SCGI00' ~is~'Gf , s0 ~'Q~S l t~D ~ ~~loo~ ~Jccs- is ~o/~~~ed ~o'r %h ~~loo~ ~.5~4d'CQ ~1I ~' n y P po~;c~, Sehoo/ 6kS r~a~9Porfa.~i'oh is Ca~~cr~~l ~p~v~~ed ~o ~r{~j/`iG~ ~ ~~~~/t , ~ti~'cG y ~ `/ bo~o(e~ the ~rl`jii'jp ~o~ ~~ ~r'ahee C/~,S~S~ 7~ 7~ie. ~e,'/,{y o~ ~G,e. ~rvJoOseG( Q~'fe~ a5l%i-o0~ ~'a~C ~4~Oq~Q~, / rlee~e ~,il'~/ be %v1 C~eaS~ ~e.SC OT ~V6rI~j~~'q~~ ,~/`idC i ~ ~ e ~Q,~e Q 1~fG~~oor1 ours ~be~ ~Oa re~I13'' lpi~ ~~ Tv~e~'~ ~~"~d dal /0 0~"? ~1 e ~ G ~~~ . ~~e0cea.~e l,~l~er Q~(,~ Scc<Ie~ ~QG~~-~~~s Qf~~cly e!r ~3 T TC~ Se/'c/C .300 P~oplc o~ ~~c~day ~o~n~"r1 J fhc•'~ ~u-~,-cL ~v ~s cG,/c~~c~ av~~ ~p ~ / ,,/ / ~//~~~~ J~ ~ / / _ ~oll.~{~S ~Sv10Lc ~~( b e S~cJ`J1 ~Gi Gvi ~. ~ ~'le.~'C, ~S~Iocc/G~ ~JZ.. /lo i~ti C/'CaSe~ ivr~~fQ(~ Old ~r-c.,/resC~c. ppe,~c~{i`ohs Cts ~i~ ~Oro~~~wr w~-~( ~C. Cor~~a~nc~ ~~t ek~s~ir~~ ~QG l,' ~i' es. ROANOZCE COUNTY DTILITY DEP?~.RTM.BNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date Name of Applicant Address of Applicant Phone Name of Developer A~ Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Iv ~ Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) . ~~ ` / C..~ n,t ~C nTa-` w . ~ 1 c.ll E ~?c~ ~ i r (~(j Y- ~(' .~ ER,I/tC_LJ Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLANIMETRIC NUMBER): Size of proposed development in acres: Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (ovER) Signature of Applicant .~ • W FU a IIII .~ Q r•.. Ee v Up x ~ 4444 ~ yU x« . ~$ E~z W ~k ~sf~ d y; ~ <a~ x> r~ynFt~ 1611eva ~~o2113W ~ ~ _$ R! w `i ~~ :r. 1 ---~ ~~ _ ~ = C ~~ \ ~ 3 ad a`~~~~d ~ ~ i 4 ~d } ~p ~ `d ~. ijs ~~j it ~~ ij ^ 1s=~ 1 l f 11 ~ s ~_ '-s ~ \ \ ~~#1 ~\>, sd t ? ~6i f ad •1 ~~ ~3{# ;f }t :i; ~d sei ~ R i }~~ ~~" a' d s ti v / .\~ ~~e f~~ai~~ } t i ~ )t!a li.l~ 3 ~' d~S~j'j ~i~9 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~is~ ~ ~>faa 1i} } ~ ~~ =a ~ i r ~ % \\ trill a: ~d~~ 2 ! s~~ } i ,isi ~_ } ' ~ ail! 1 =s,~ ~ \ atli# #i~#~ # ~ i z #j ;~ #~ i{{ ~aad{~ #~ ii ~ jai=s ~~~' ~~ 4' i~ ,f ~S ~\ -,'-+~~~ ~,~t:; ;i~i.~ii ~ ~~ ~t ilit a~ ~i ~1~ >lt~;~##~€i;~ ~ i;,:Y ~a#ff ~d~f ~ € - `' ~ ~ ~ \ i 11111 II I' 1~.1(I~ `~\~ •} 11. ~Ce '~~,j~ip` u~~`,~I y; ;~~ •r~~~'~ ~\ ~ \\ `\ \\ a~f t, [ : F \ ;~ /rl IIII' _,~..ry~ YY ~ ~~ sf ~ / _~ ai i - I. ~_ \ ~\L _^v`M~~\\ \ `\ \`~~ ~} /~ I / I t 1\.. 1~%~~ < _ . ±~ ~ iii ~ .~ c ° 1 i ~ ~ t `^~` ~ f- ^ l i I a `<} ~/! lill ~ Y f" / / 1 ~S~ ~~/~ i ~~~/%~ lax ~ ~ ~ ~1 ! / i 3Y~! ~~f _~• ~/~ ~' 'i ~~,1,,~ / / a ~. \ a~,~c a , \\E6~}1 I\ \ '1 S~•`-•t ~;~ •aI ice: Ia3~ .~~ \ \\ I \ 1 ; ~ ~~~k"=iF Z . \ \\ \ \ ~\' t 1\ ~_r" ~ a t 3 fm oii ti~ ~ l \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ e s \ ~,\ \•.~. ~ ~ O 1 \111 11 i1 \\\ \\ \\~~ \ \\ / ~ \\\4\C`~/`#/\ ~ \\ ' /7T i \ \ 1 I 1 \ \,\ \\ \\` \ \ \ 1 \` \`\\,~ ~\. 1 1 1, 1 1 I I 1 111 \ ~• \ \ ~ ~1 `:' \../ ` 'S 1 1 'i 1 1.11 1 ~ \ \~ / \\r \ \ 1\ I I` 11 11 1,111,11 1111\\\ \\\\ !\ •~ \\~\~ ~~ x \ II I I 1. 1 1\ \ ~`, \l. 1 1 1 \ r ..\ I r I ~ \ 1 '~\, \ ' \ ` I - ~ \\ \ \\ .tom 1~ \ \\\\\ I~.'l-I _ ..\ \\\ ~I \! ~. ~_ 1 ._ ~ , lay .`~ f4~ m '~ Ir YI + ii h~ #~ I f /,~} F d: / , :.I r I ;I :.' I I i r•I I' rJ ~I II S. i l -~`------ * I ~ I I ~ \i~ =. ~i ~ ~ IIII ~_~" t II Ihui / 1 t ~t_~Y~ t / ~ 'may ~ ,• .:a'\ `i f \ ~ i I I /-. f : k ~~ / / is / I',I ~lL /• I i t -=2 ,a I .~. ~ j ,,~~--~~ i l= i~ 1~ i I j ~~' #y,~.4.7'r ~ C=~rA I 1 i ~ rllll 1 1 ~ r•°'s. r r .~ ~Ily a i t s :21 r:~ l 7 .' i, ~'I I ~ d - ~I ~`_ `s`Y i •/ IIII\ ~ ' 1 1 !i ~ i ~; III i 7 1 :^~' w'~a... r\ J / r ;III; ~S. i I ~ / 1 I _ I f ~ /, . I I I I ~ r / r ~~ 1' f ~l' ji ~ - !{< l ! .fir l /I ~ 'I;~• F e~ t /.r 1 CI~', a- 1 ~~I ; I E 1 `. (' ~ ~ f r r. - - ' 1 '.i4 ~ / i l r i.ll -- I s ' Ir' 1~ t `~ .f :II' r - 1~ ''rl' ~ r-' a ! I _~; a I~ ~ ~. ` fir. ~.. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ . l~ h ..SiQI~.I3~.`9J~OU80~ .~ 'xr -- ° •q~iru~~ ~ 1sRdEg asoiiay~ ~ -_ . - : • - ~~ - - - _~ ~. ;,, ~. ~, - ~- - ~ ~~ t. _ , , _' .q~ it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~g i _ -_~ ~J ' ` ~ :. C J ' ~ ~~~~ ~, -' .. ~ - - -- --- - r '~: jt', F ~, v 1' w ~ 'j; ^ ~, =' - - - ~ ~ ';~~' li ~ ~4 .. ~ ~`~ =~= ; i ~ ., C ... - ~J. - .. ~-. ~ ~ ~ - KSi-. '.': i ~- _ .. - , 4i . - ~ _ x~ - ' -• ' ~_~ ~- r5,^ • - , .~ ~~ .- '~~{{`' - ' ~-. ~•4 ~ ~ ~ ~. 4i: - ~~ ..~ - ~ - ~ ~~ :f _ ~~ 1r'r Y ~i s~t ~ ~ _ ~;~,,!_~ Ji~i~ii .! , ~ .' i ~a "~--. I ' '~i Y I L-- ~ I F ~~ ~ ea. ~;'~'i.; I r3 ~~~ ~~i~-~~~ _ :u 1 min` a . ~ ~ ~ y li r _ ~ i~ r ~ '~ i ' LJ'~'~~_ ~ T: ~~ c . Ala ~h~n~-. a - ~ i{ ~` ~_~~ ~ t ~~-~ i; ~~ i\ ~1, • ~ i t f-- - - ~ ~ ~~ - - `~ - r ~ ~ m ~I ii -I. ~ - ~! Y _ .~ ~; ~~ is - .. .. :. ~_ .~ 'r . ~. ~.. _..... r~ ~9 "~~N~ i`ce'/ i LAKES ~ POOL ~~9 ND ~~ H ~ RFC '~, ~Q, OUDAY ~,~ c R• ~ SUOER ~~ 9 id ~. NAfFLE M , o rr~~11TTCC~~YY QTfi '. s, p~S,44 x• c,9~'FQ~ CERGFNCY 2 ~~ CG S vrCFSO .4%~ 9~a \ ~p Rd 1 ~fy v ~.R ~ ~ 117 0 9o~b. y ~ ~r ~„ 0 WbC a PL1 --' . 1 CENT VICINITY MAP 1R0 ,-~ ,~ s-, Q NORTH ~` ~ 3 1s i\ s~ e ~t 4 ••M1 U 9s `9 ~ ~ 4,~1 e~~~ ~_ • e 9s< ~~ e 3 1<~ti, t+~417 ~~ 3 \ + 2 • ~'' .< • ,. d ,~ to . ,,1 ~ ' '' + + a ~ ~ < 19 ~. r ti , ' ~ ~ti~ t" ~ ~ 25.1 Y 7 20 • p 21 a fo ~ e ~'° ~~ ~2 21 e \ ~ 4.MAe i+ Cyg J<Aes/ Iea+O M S1>tir O. ~2 ~ 12 s .,,~ o, 6 d 1< r<n.ri tArd 9 ]fl A< i 9..?`' n 24 ' IeA< 6 f{ ; F p `; ~ ~ z u : s 3 L3 Ol e z 13 J ~ 4 ~ i 12 \ '< y ~ ` 1 ~ ~ ~ p ~ < 1 ~ ~ f ~ ~.3< M ~ A~ tlL ` ~T'~ 31 f ~ r . ~t<< P 3~1 2B P~ 1~ ~ 9 ~ n z ~ ~ a ieki zs 1 3 c n i M , < <,~ M~•~ AC/1 3 d • 3 4v, "3 f ~ 111/ - ~ ~ - ~ 100A< >~ ... «)! S . ~ ~ IS <<P ~"+ ~ <~a N .w ~< s ~ ~ ~ <t1 s.i ~o w w <.ei A< ' 9 ,6 it 23 <s~s S 16 A + z + R „ 22 ~ ~ r , ' ' ' 1 11 1 < < 17 n Lrw~w. G~we ~g <+ ~+ ~ : s$ ~<,; ' ,,,< ! cow ,n 20 - ~ q <~ , t f d t w e <~ „ <A 42 4 ~ • ry 1 <<+~ / !f v < «)) ~ O O •.,~ w' ~ Dr. ~ ~ y ~ ~a 4s <<• ,,,, a G`i ., Q` ~~, S~ r' 47 e ~~ 43 ' ~ I 4e ~~ ~° M < ~ ~ W _ a ..• 21.1 0~ 2.2~ Ae y ^.,~,4nd.eit..a..e., s ,<L ,,,...„<,1.. ~, ~ P z:.z ST+Ac wc. ss. ~~ )~ ~1 ~4 ~ ~," DEPARTf~NT OF PLANNII~TG ~''T/TIDl~lE2: N~E[,~PoSE $~t?I'is7" cr~lU~ct! z ~ ~ AND ZONING ~X MAP ~UM18F.~': 3'l</4 " /- 22 ,~ •. ~E~FST: S~/.u !-rSE - zaay CAKE CE~Ic,2, 1~ I. ~~ ACTION ITEM NUMBER .~/~- j_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Acquire Necessary Easements to Construct the South Transmission Line COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~-w~ ~~,[~C-bY~'Lry a~~y t BACKGROUND' The Board of Supervisors has approved the South Transmission Line and Starkey Water Line Projects along with the appropriate funding. The above projects will involve acquisition of approximately 150 easements. In order to secure the required properties in a timely manner, staff will bring a partial list of affected properties for approval by the Board instead of waiting until all properties have been identified. The following is a list of properties involved: TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACQUISITION 97.05-01-01 Harris, Ola Agee Easement 97.01-02-12 Lemon, Curtis & Dorothy and Lemon, Charles & Anne Easement 97.01-02-11 Bogese, Catherine L. Easement 97.01-02-10 Lemon, Charles & Curtis Easement 96.02-01-43 McCormick, Nina H. Easement 86.03-04-05 Arthur, Jeffrey D. & Bernice Easement 86.03-02-01 Reed, Lewis H. & Alene Easement 86.03-01-43 Hofer, Charles & Zurna Easement 86.01-01-49.1 Minter, Wayne E. & Glenna S. Easement 86.01-01-49.2 Spitzer, Arnold R. & Donna Easement 86.01-01-45 Brundedge, Jasper & Sharon Easement 76.03-04-51 Harman, Richard P. & Margaret Easement 76.03-04-33 Jones, Thomas Michael & Mabel Easement 76.03-03-78 Turner, Charles B. & Connie Easement 76.03-03-75 Kettleson, J. Benton & Wanda Easement 74.00-02-23 Obenchain, Learleen Easement 74.00-02-22.3 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement 74.00-02-22.1 Palmer, Tony & Donna Easement S-/ TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACOUISITION 74.00-02-16 Huffman, Steven & Sandra Easement 74.00-02-06 Neely, Billy & Clydis Easement 74.00-01-40 Laplace, Roger & Suzanne Easement 74.00-01-38 Brown, William E. & Darlene K. Easement 74.00-01-36 Pavich, Jessie D. & Billie H. Easement 74.00-01-34 Aliff, Clarence, Jr., & Brenda M. Easement 74.00-01-34.1 Buck, James Easement 74.00-01-33 Austin, Samuel & Virginia Easement 74.00-01-32 Kanode, Ronald G. & Debbie W. Easement 74.00-01-31 Kanode, Roman R. & Polly S. Easement 74.00-01-25 Bryant, Allen R., Jr., & Jane Easement 74.00-01-24 Toler, Wayne M. Easement 74.00-01-21 Wimmer, Lillian Ora, Heirs Easement 74.00-01-12.2 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement 74.00-01-12 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement 74.00-01-08.2 Wimmer, Woodrow M. & Sharon G. Easement 73.00-02-38.2 Cooper, Jerry N. & Mary G. Easement 73.00-02-37 Foster, R. N. & Mary O. Easement 73.00-02-32 Foster, Robert N. & Mary O. Easement 73.00-02-11 Reynolds, Keith & Margaret Easement 73.00-02-10 Reynolds, Margaret T. Easement 73.00-01-71 Page, Terry J. (c/o James Page) Easement 73.00-01-68.2 Kristensen, Kim & Susanne Easement 73.00-01-68.1 Wood, Wayne & Vicki Easement 73.00-01-68 Fisher, Curtis & Janice Easement 73.00-01-67 Joiner, Murray E. & Patricia B. Easement 73.00-01-59 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement 73.00-01-58 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement 73.00-01-56 Fisher, Jessie & Myrtle Easement 73.00-01-8.12 Blankenship, Herbert E. & Coleman, Dan C. Easement 73.00-01-05 Appalachian Power Company Easement 73.00-01-04 Appalachian Power Company Easement 66.04-O1-13 Renick, C. John & James Easement 66.04-O1-12.2 McAden James W. Easement 66.02-01-03 Mitchell, Evelyn Marie Easement 66.01-03-19 Moran, R. L., Jr. & Martha S. Easement 66.01-03-15 Watts, George Easement 66.01-03-09 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement 66.01-03-08 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement 66.01-03-06 Lucado, James R. & Mary L. Easement 66.01-01-19 Akers, Gordon L. & Sandra Easement 66.01-O1-17 Hale, David L. Easement 66.01-O1-16 Holdren, Alan Richard Easement 66.01-01-15.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement 66.01-02-15 Sisk, William A. & Bettle E. Easement 66.01-01-14.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement 66.01-02-09 Clingenpeel, Ronald L. & Betty Easement 66.01-01-20 Wood, Robert E., Jr. Easement 66.01-01-13 Mills, Lewis Harvey & Mary W. Easement 66.01-01-05 Hale, William E. Easement 66.01-01-03 Hale, William E. Easement TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACOUISITI 66.01-01-02 Haymaker, Charlotte K. Easement 66.01-01-01 Salem, City of Easement 66.00-01-12.4 Moulse, Helen H. Easement 65.00-03-10.7 Noell, Brent L. Easement 65.00-03-10.6 Noell, Keith E. & Cathy Easement 65.00-03-10.2 Webb, Frank Wayne Easement 65.00-03-10.1 Noell, Brent L. & Susan C. Easement 65.00-03-03 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement 65.00-03-02 Hedge, Willie D. & Laura K. Easement 65.00-03-01 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement 65.00-02-37 Beason, F. M. & Audrey O. Easement 65.00-02-35 Lucas, Dennis L. & Leketa C. Easement 65.00-01-43 Hudson, Grace Lee Hale Easement 65.00-01-42 Boone, Charles W. Easement 65.00-01-09 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement 65.00-01-08 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement 65.00-O1-05 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement 65.00-01-04.1 Helton, Christopher W. Easement 65.00-01-04 Barnett, Robert E. Easement 65.00-01-03 Thurman, Ellen Marie Easement 65.00-O1-02 Thomas, David & Martha Easement 65.00-01-01 Mauney, Harry C. & Mary D. Easement Staff would recommend that the payment for acquisition of easements be in an amount negotiated with the property owner not to exceed 40% of assessed value of the land plus any actual damage to improvements as established by County assessment records or an appraisal made by an independent appraiser retained by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The cost of easement acquisition is included as part of the overall project budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the first reading of an Ordinance authorizing acquisition of easements at a cost not to exceed 40% of the assessed value plus cost of actual damage to improvements as established by County assessment records or an appraiser retained by the County as needed for the South Transmission Line. .~'- / SUBMITTED BY: . 7 C~ Clifford Cra' , P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~/ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~'- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE SOUTH TRANSMISSION LINE AND THE STARKEY ROAD WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, location plans for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project have been completed and the projects will require acquisition of easements across certain properties; and, WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the water line project; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary easements for the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Project are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: Tax Map No. Propert y Owner 97.05-01-01 Harris, Ola Agee 97.01-02-12 Lemon, Curtis & Dorothy and Lemon, Charles & Anne 97.01-02-11 Bogese, Catherine L. 97.01-02-10 Lemon, Charles & Curtis 96.02-01-43 McCormi ck, Nina H. 86.03-04-05 Arthur, Jeffrey D. & Bernice 86.03-02-01 Reed, Lewis H. & Alene 86.03-01-43 Hofer, Charles & Zurna Acquisition Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement ~" ~ / TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACQUISITION 86.01-01-49.1 Minter, Wayne E. & Glenna S. Easement 86.01-01-49.2 Spitzer, Arnold R. & Donna Easement 86.01-01-45 Brundedge, Jasper & Sharon Easement 76.03-04-51 Harman, Richard P. & Margaret Easement 76.03-04-33 Jones, Thomas Michael & Mabel Easement 76.03-03-78 Turner, Charles B. & Connie Easement 76.03-03-75 Kettleson, J. Benton & Wanda Easement 74.00-02-23 Obenchain, Learleen Easement 74.00-02-22.3 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement 74.00-02-22.1 Palmer, Tony & Donna Easement 74.00-02-16 Huffman, Steven & Sandra Easement 74.00-02-06 Neely, Billy & Clydis Easement 74.00-01-40 Laplace, Roger & Suzanne Easement 74.00-01-38 Brown, William E. & Darlene K. Easement 74.00-01-36 Pavich, Jessie D. & Billie H. Easement 74.00-O1-34 Aliff, Clarence, Jr., & Brenda M. Easement 74.00-01-34.1 Buck, James Easement 74.00-O1-33 Austin, Samuel & Virginia Easement 74.00-01-32 Kanode, Ronald G. & Debbie W. Easement 74.00-01-31 Kanode, Roman R. & Polly S. Easement 74.00-01-25 Bryant, Allen R., Jr., & Jane Easement 74.00-01-24 Toler, Wayne M. Easement 74.00-01-21 Wimmer, Lillian Ora, Heirs Easement 74.00-01-12.2 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement 74.00-01-12 Beverly, Wendell H. & Lillian A. Easement 74.00-01-08.2 Wimmer, Woodrow M. & Sharon G. Easement 73.00-02-38.2 Cooper, Jerry N. & Mary G. Easement 73.00-02-37 Foster, R. N. & Mary O. Easement 73.00-02-32 Foster, Robert N. & Mary O. Easement 73.00-02-11 Reynolds, Keith & Margaret Easement 73.00-02-10 Reynolds, Margaret T. Easement 73.00-01-71 Page, Terry J. (c/o James Page) Easement 73.00-01-68.2 Kristensen, Kim & Susanne Easement 73.00-01-68.1 Wood, Wayne & Vicki Easement 73.00-01-68 Fisher, Curtis & Janice Easement 73.00-01-67 Joiner, Murray E. & Patricia B. Easement 73.00-01-59 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement 73.00-01-58 Fisher, Elizabeth Easement 73.00-01-56 Fisher, Jessie & Myrtle Easement 73.00-01-8.12 Blankenship, Herbert E. & Coleman, Dan C. Easement 73.00-01-05 Appalachian Power Company Easement 73.00-01-04 Appalachian Power Company Easement 66.04-O1-13 Renick, C. John & James Easement 66.04-01-12.2 McAden James W. Easement 66.02-01-03 Mitchell, Evelyn Marie Easement 66.01-03-19 Moran, R. L., Jr. & Martha S. Easement 66.01-03-15 Watts, George Easement 66.01-03-09 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement 66.01-03-08 Duncan, Arthur K. & Bessie Easement 2 ~` / TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER ACQUISITION 66.01-03-06 Lucado, James R. & Mary L. Easement 66.01-01-19 Akers, Gordon L. & Sandra Easement 66.01-01-17 Hale, David L. Easement 66.01-01-16 Holdren, Alan Richard Easement 66.01-01-15.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement 66.01-02-15 Sisk, William A. & Bettle E. Easement 66.01-01-14.1 Akers, Jerry L. Easement 66.01-02-09 Clingenpeel, Ronald L. & Betty Easement 66.01-01-20 Wood, Robert E., Jr. Easement 66.01-01-13 Mills, Lewis Harvey & Mary W. Easement 66.01-01-05 Hale, William E. Easement 66.01-01-03 Hale, William E. Easement 66.01-01-02 Haymaker, Charlotte K. Easement 66.01-01-01 Salem, City of Easement 66.00-01-12.4 Moulse, Helen H. Easement 65.00-03-10.7 Noell, Brent L. Easement 65.00-03-10.6 Noell, Keith E. & Cathy Easement 65.00-03-10.2 Webb, Frank Wayne Easement 65.00-03-10.1 Noell, Brent L. & Susan C. Easement 65.00-03-03 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement 65.00-03-02 Hedge, Willie D. & Laura K. Easement 65.00-03-01 Noell, Shirley Webb Easement 65.00-02-37 Beason, F. M. & Audrey O. Easement 65.00-02-35 Lucas, Dennis L. & Leketa C. Easement 65.00-01-43 Hudson, Grace Lee Hale Easement 65.00-01-42 Boone, Charles W. Easement 65.00-01-09 Alls, Marvin J. & Lillian Easement 65.00-O1-08 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement 65.00-01-05 Obenchain, Horace M. Easement 65.00-01-04.1 Helton, Christopher W. Easement 65.00-O1-04 Barnett, Robert E. Easement 65.00-01-03 Thurman, Ellen Marie Easement 65.00-01-02 Thomas, David & Martha Easement 65.00-01-01 Mauney, Harry C. & Mary D. Easement 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40 % of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project funds; and, 3 S-/ 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agendakealest\[rana2 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~"+~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTING OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~,~`~ ,~ ~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This ordinance readopts Sec 12-8, Adopting of State Law, in order to incorporate changes adopted by the 1993 session of the General Assembly as well as future changes in the law. BACKGROUND• Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia authorizes localities to incorporate by reference into their ordinances appropriate provisions of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia as well as other code sections dealing with driving offenses. In previous years it was necessary for localities to readopt these state code provisions each year in order to incorporate any amendments made to the Code of Virginia by the General Assembly. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In an amendment to § 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia this year, the General Assembly made the adoption of such incorporating ordinance to also include future changes made by the legislature. Therefore, it will no longer be necessary to have the Board readopt this section each year in order to remain in conformity with the Code of Virginia. FISCAL IMPACTS: Failure to adopt this ordinance may have a negative impact on county receipts by prohibiting certain traffic offenses being charged as county code violations. ~ ~"` ALTERNATIVES• 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Retain the current section, adopted in 1992, without incorporating the 1993 state law amendments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative # 1. Respectfully submitted, Jos h B. benshain Sen r Ass tant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 12-8, ADOPTING OF STATE LAW OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has recently amended § 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia to provide for the automatic incorporation of amendments to certain sections of state law into local ordinances which have been properly adopted without the need for yearly reenactment by the local governing body and to permit the incorporation of additional provisions of the state code; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-8, "Adoption of state law," Article I, "In General," of Chapter 12, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, all of the provisions and requirement of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.2 ~~'~'`~:~<~?'~~~'':"?s~::"" .;;::.;:.;;:;~:::::.;;;:>.;:;.;:.;;::: ~.~..e.;:.:.;~..: ~:.: ~>~.~~.~.:: .;;;:.::.;:.;:.;:: .::::.::.::::::::::::::::::::. .......... 1c 1 e 2 ............................................:::.~._:~.;:.;:~.;:.;:.:;.:.;;:.;:.;:.;:;::::::~?:~~~;:.::;~::::r~:~:.;::~?:~,.~~..~:::.~:~.:~.::1:: ; and in Art' 18.2-266 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those provisions and requirement which, by their very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are ~~- hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the county. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirement hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirement of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all .................................................................................................... amendments to said laws made effective +~><e~~:~ve:::>::da:~~>::v: .................................................................................................... :~:~<:>:»or~~nazze~:>:>:::r~?~:~~ec~~:><:sach>::>:~a~e:>:::~w::::>as:>:>:b~en»>:~~ :mod:>::k~:...... h ::::: P :::::::::::::::::.: ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::. ~::::::::::::::::::::.P.:::::::..::::::::: lt:..: ~::::::::::::. ~ziu~t-~i-i~~i^~i~raircci~ res err-eT€ee~i~oxc- 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its adoption. c:\wp51\age~daUnotocveh.ord 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~""` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: v ~~~`°t~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• These amendments incorporate the latest changes to the Code of Virginia regulating bingo games and raffles adopted by the 1993 session of the General Assembly. In two areas, the Board of Supervisors is given additional authority to establish standards for operations of bingo games and raffles BACKGROUND• A locality's authority to permit and control games of bingo and raffles is strictly defined by the detailed provisions of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Whenever the General Assembly makes changes in this portion of the Code of Virginia, as was done in 1993, local governing bodies must bring their local ordinances into agreement with these Code changes. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The most significant changes which the General Assembly made in the Bingo and Raffles Article of the Code of Virginia were to permit localities to establish a mandatory percentage of an organizations gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles which must be used for its charitable purposes [Sec. 4-101] and to limit the number of organizations for which an individual may manage, operate or conduct bingo games [Sec. 4-90(d)]. Staff recommends that any organization receiving a permit for a bingo game or raffle must use twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of the gross receipts from such an activity for its charitable, religious, educational or community services. Other amendments will now expressly permit "duck races" as a type of raffle and expand the category of individuals who may "participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle" under Sec. 4-90(a). However, no person who has been convicted of certain crimes may now "participate" in those activities. [Sec. 4-90(e)]. The Code did ,,T-3 liberalize the percentage of gross receipts which may come from instant bingo to 50 % from the previous 33 & 1/3 0, [Sec. 4-102 (b) ] , and now permits raffle drawings to be conducted either in the locality issuing the permit or in the locality where the majority of the tickets are sold. Finally, the audit requirements were changed yet again by exempting organizations with less than $2,000 in gross receipts from the audit requirements of Sec. 4-99, but reverting to a threshold of $250,000 for an opinion by an indepen- dent C.P.A. from the $500,000 figure adopted just last year [Sec. 4-97(b)]. Other incidental record keeping requirements are also codified. FISCAL IMPACTS' None anticipated ALTERNATIVES' 1. Adopt this ordinance and bring the Roanoke County Code into conformity with Virginia law. 2. Do not adopt this ordinance and risk the possibility of our ordinance, or parts of it, being held unenforceable as not in conformity with state law. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative # 1. Respectfully submitted, J~~ph UB. Obenshain S for Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs F\wp51\agenda\bingorpL7L7 2 ~"" *s.~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE V. BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE. WHEREAS, § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the governing body of any county to adopt an ordinance for the purpose of regulating any bingo game or raffle within such county as long as not in conflict with the provisions of Article 1.1, Bingo and Raffles, of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the 1993 Session of the General Assembly has adopted amendments to the above mentioned Article 1.1, Binao and Raffles, which necessitate corresponding amendments to the Roanoke County Code to remove any conflict between the County Code and the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993; and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article V. Bingo Games and Raffles of Chapter 4, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follow: DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 4-86. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: ,T-.~ Sec. 4-90. Participation in management, operation, or conduct generally. c" Except for `persons employed as clerical assistants by has been a member of such organization for at least ninety (90) days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, operation, or conduct of any bingo games or raffle. >~< Except as provided herein no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in the management, operation or conduct of any such game or raffle. Persons employed by organizations composed of or for deaf or blind persons may receive remuneration not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00) per event for providing clerical assistance in the conduct of bingo games or 2 ~' raffles only for such organization. Persons eighteen (18) years of age and under who sell raffle tickets to raise funds for youth activities in which they participate may receive non-monetary incentive awards or prizes from the organization provided that organization is non-profit. ~'j>~~~'he spouse of any such bona fide member or a firefighter 3 (2 ) No re ular bin o or s ecial bin o ~~~ ~~'~'~~~~~~~ g g P g game ~ shall exceed one hundred dollars ($100.00). (3) No instant bingo prize for a single card shall exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00). (4) No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). (b) Any bingo game in which all the gross receipts from players for that game are paid as prize money back to the players shall not be subject to the limitations of this section, but there shall not be more than one such game per calendar day of play and the prize money from any such game shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). (Ord. No. 2816, § 4-22G, 3-24-81) State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 18.2-340.9(G, I). Sec. 4-97. Certificate to accompany financial report. (a) The financial report required by section 4-96 shall be accompanied by a certificate, verified under oath, by the board of directors of the organization that the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have been used for those lawful, religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized and that the operation of bingo games or raffles has been in accordance with this article. (b) Any organization having annual gross receipts from bingo 4 s~ ames or raffles in exces '~~:':~;.,,. i..,,,..a,....a thousand dollars ( $'~~~}~p~i~? ) as shown on its annual financial report, shall attach to such report an opinion executed by a licensed independent certified public accountant that (i) the annual financial report presents fairly, in all material respects, beginning cash, receipts, operating cost, use of proceeds, and ending cash (ii) the proceeds of any bingo games or raffles have been used, in all material respects, for those lawful, religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized; and (iii) the gross receipts have been used in all material respects in accordance with the provisions of this article. (c) The failure to file the opinion of a licensed independent certified public accountant, when required, shall cause the automatic revocation of the permit and no organization shall conduct any bingo game or raffle thereafter until the opinion required by this section is properly filed with the report and a new permit obtained. The opinion required by this section is in addition to the audit and audit fee required by Sec. 4-99. (Ord. No. 2816, § 4-18, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 92689-14, § 1, 9-26-89) State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 18.2-340.6(B). Sec. 4-98. Additional records as to bingo games. In addition to the records required by section 4-96, an organization holding a permit under this article shall maintain a record, in writing, of the dates on which bingo is played, the 5 6 ~~ / ~~ by the commissioner shall represent the amount of time and other services expended by the commissioner on the audit. All audit fees received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only for the purposes of auditing and regulating bingo games and raffles. (b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed so as to prohibit the commissioner of revenue or any official designated by the board of supervisors from performing unannounced audits or restrict any right of the commissioner or such official to secure records required to be maintained by the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 2816, §§ 4-18, 4-19, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 12291-5, § 1, 1- 22-91) State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, §§ 18.2-340.6(C), 18.2-340.7. Sec. 4-101. Restrictions on use of Gross Receipts from Bingo Games or Raffles. Except for reasonable and proper operating costs, including costs associated with providing clerical assistance in the conduct of bingo games or raffles for organizations composed of or for deaf or blind persons, publicizing the time and place of bingo games and raffles, and prizes, no part of the gross receipts derived by an organization permitted to conduct bingo games or raffles may be used for any purpose other than (i) those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the which the organization is specifically chartered or organized 7 8 ~--~ DIVISION 2. PERMIT sec. 4-113. Qualifications of applicant. Prior to the issuance of a permit under this division, the applicant organization must meet the following requirements: (1) Except for recently established volunteer fire and rescue companies or departments after county approval, such organization shall have been in existence and met on a regular basis in the county or in a county, city or town adjacent to this county for a period of at least two (2) years immediately prior to making application for such permit. A permit may be issued, however, to an organization which relocates its meeting place, on a permanent basis, from another jurisdiction to the county and which complies with the requirements of this subparagraph, provided such organization was the holder of a valid permit at the time of such relocation. 9 ~~~ ~~''>'In no case shall the organization apply for or receive have always been operated in the past as a nonprofit organization and shall have been in existence as such nonprofit organization for a period of at least two (2) years immediately prior to making application for the permit. (3~) Any organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations exceed, or can be expected to exceed, seventy- five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to section 501-(c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. At the same time tax-exempt status is sought from the Internal Revenue Service, the same documentation may 10 ~~~ be filed with the Board of Supervisors for an interim certification of tax-exempt status. If such documentation is filed, the Board of Supervisors may, after reviewing such documentation as it may deem necessary, issue its determination of tax-exempt status within sixty days of receipt of such documentation. A fee of $500.00 shall accompany any request for interim certification of tax-exempt status; provided, however, that such fee may be waived at the discretion of the Board of Supervisors. This interim certification of tax- exempt status shall be valid until the Internal Revenue Service issues its determination of tax-exempt status, or for eighteen months, whichever is earlier. (~4) An organization shall designate an individual who shall be responsible for filing the annual or quarterly financial report required by this article if the organization goes out of business or otherwise ceases to operate. (Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81) 11 ~i~ State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 18.2-340.3(1, 2, 3, 4,& 5). Sec. 4-117. valid only in county and at designated locations; exception. A permit issued under this division shall be valid only in this county and only in such locations as are designated in the permit application. However, an organization which has obtained a permit to conduct a raffle may sell such raffle tickets both in and ou t o f t he ~.:::::: :say;~:a~,.~~;::a.~:.:::~~i:~~:.:;~::;;~i~:: ;~?~t:::;::c~::.:~~e::.::~~~~ .. ,; :..::..;::.. ' : '...;;:.. ,.:; ::::.: :.:::... . :::::. ~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............:::::.::::::::.:: ~:::::::::::::::::.: ~ .......... ~....:::::::::::.~:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.............. ~~.~::::~~-~.:. ~ ~:s~ ~..~....v~:::.~.zai.::.t~e ;:?~;:i:'~i:~if;:Y;i:{?v: ~:;:1 ::i:i:: ~':::::'v.iiii:i'~i::;ri:Y;ii:::iii:!+ti;:~::iii$::i:^iii:':::.'~:i:::iii::i::i:i:i::i:ti:::i::i::i::i'H: 'r: <x~~~1~;c~~~:~<~:~;~~z~:: ><the:~~ :.e..xt~<~ exce t that u - ................................................................::::.;;;~:::::::;';;:.;:.;:.;::::P:.;;:.;;;:.:>::»';:.;:.;: ~ p p 11 tab devices as defined in Sec. 4-86 used as part of a raffle may be sold only upon the premises owned or exclusively leased by such organization and at such times as it is not opened to the public, except to members and their guests. (Ord. No. 2816, § 4-15, 3-24-81) State law reference(s)--Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 18.2-340.3(2). 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be October 1, 1993. c:\wp51\agendalbingordT27 12 ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 72793-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 5-21, DEFINITIONS, AND 5-44 TA% IMPOSED, ADDING SECTIONS 5-26.1 TO 5-26.5 AND REPEALING SECTION 5-26 OF ARTICLE II. DOGE. CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO CONTROL DANGEROIIS AND VICIOUS DOGS. WHEREAS, injury or death to innocent children and adults has become a more serious problem in the Roanoke Valley in recent years; and WHEREAS, the current definition of vicious dog contained in Sec. 5-26 of the Roanoke County Code is not sufficiently detailed or comprehensive to deal with the many and varied situations which the County's Animal Control Officers are called upon to handle; and WHEREAS, neighboring jurisdictions to the County of Roanoke have recently amended their animal control ordinances to expand the power of their Animal Control Officers to deal with dangerous and vicious dogs; and WHEREAS the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 13, 1993; and the second reading on July 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. Dogs, Cats, and Other Animals of Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 5-21. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Dangerous doq: Any dog (1) which causes a wound to any person without provocation on public or private property; (2) which, while off the property of its owner, has killed a domestic animal; (3) which is owned or harbored primarily or in part for the purpose of dog fighting or any dog trained for dog fighting; (4) which, unprovoked, chases or approaches persons upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property other than the owner's property in a menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack; (5) which has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, to cause injury or otherwise to threaten the safety of human beings or domestic animals; or (6) which has been declared dangerous by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth. Any dog evidencing the characteristics or conduct described in subsections (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above shall be a "dangerous dog" even though not previously found dangerous by any Court. Vicious doa: Any dog which (1) kills a person; (2) inflicts serious wound to a person, including multiple bites, disfigurement, impairment of health, or impairment of any bodily function; (3) continues to exhibit the behavior which resulted in a previous finding by a Court that it is a dangerous dog; or ( 4 ) which has 2 been found vicious by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth. Any dog evidencing the characteristics or conduct described in subsections (1), (2), or (3) above shall be a "vicious dog" even though not previously found vicious by any Court. Sec. 5-26.1. Dangerous dogs; vicious dog; penalties; procedures. (a) Dangerous dog. It shall be unlawful and a class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known to be a dangerous dog, as defined by Section 5-21, except in strict compliance with Section 5-26.3 of this Code. If after hearing evidence, the Court finds any dog to be a dangerous dog, the Court shall, in addition to any other penalties imposed, order the dog's owner to comply with the provisions of Section 5-26.3. If any owner knew or reasonably should have known any dog to be a dangerous dog and such dog thereafter causes a wound to any person, such owner shall be guilty 3 of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (b) Vicious doa. It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known to be a vicious dog, as defined by Section 5-21. If, after hearing evidence, the Court finds any dog to be a vicious dog, the Court shall, in addition to any other penalties imposed, order the animal control officer to euthanize the dog. If any owner knew or reasonably should have known any dog to be a vicious dog and such dog thereafter causes a wound to any person, such owner shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (c) Procedures. When a warrant has been obtained or a summons issued pursuant to this Section, the animal control officer and/or police officer may, in his discretion, confine the dog until such time as evidence shall be heard and a verdict rendered. The Court may, through its contempt power, compel the owner of any dog to produce it for the animal control officer and/or police officer. In the event any dog is found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog, the owner of such dog shall be responsible for payment to the County of any expenses of impounding and keeping the dog pending disposition of the case at the rate prescribed by the County Board of Supervisors. Sec. 5-26.2 Licensure of dangerous doq. (a) The owner of any dog found by a Court to be a dangerous dog shall, within ten (10) days of such finding, obtain a dangerous 4 dog license from the Treasurer by paying the fee required by Section 5-41 of this Code. The Treasurer shall provide the owner with a uniformly designed tag which identifies the dog as a dangerous dog. The owner shall affix the tag to the dog's collar and ensure that the dog wears collar and tag at all times. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be renewed annually as required by Section 5-41 of this Code. (b) No dangerous dog license shall be issued until the applicant has filed with the Treasurer the insurance certificate required by Sec. 5-26.3(c). The Treasurer shall immediately forward such certificate to the County's Risk Manager for review and filing. The Risk Manager shall immediately notify the animal control officer of any noncompliance with the provisions of Sec. 5-26.3(c) of which the Risk Manager becomes aware. Sec. 5-26.3 Reepinq dangerous dogs; conditions. It shall be unlawful for any owner of any dangerous dog to own, keep, or harbor any such dog within the County except in compliance with each of the following conditions and specifications: (a) Any dangerous dog shall be securely confined indoors or, if kept outdoors, shall be kept in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure adequate to confine the dog and located upon the premises of the owner of the dog. Any such pen or structure shall have secure sides and a secure top and, if it has no bottom secured to the sides, the sides shall be imbedded into the ground no less 5 than two (2) feet. Such pen or structures shall provide any such dog with adequate space and protection from the elements and shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. (b) The owner of any dangerous dog shall display two (2) signs on his property stating: "Dangerous Dog on Premises." One sign shall be posted at the front of the property, and the second sign shall be posted at the rear of the property. Each sign shall be capable of being read from a distance of fifty (50) feet. (c) The owner of any dangerous dog shall procure and maintain public liability insurance in the amount of $50,000 insuring the owner for any injury or damage caused by such dog. The owner shall maintain a valid policy and certificate of insurance issued by the insurance carrier or agent as to the coverage required by this Subsection at the premises where such dog is kept and shall, upon request, display such policy and certificate to any animal control officer or police officer. (d) The owner of any dangerous dog shall have such dog permanently identified by means of a tatoo on an inside thigh, and the owner of any dangerous dog shall provide the animal control officer with a color photograph of the dog taken within the last twelve (12) months, suitable for use in identifying the dog. (e) If any dangerous dog is taken off the property of its owner, such dog shall be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length, and such dog shall at all times be kept under the control of a responsible person. Such muzzle shall be constructed in such a manner that it 6 will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal, but such that it will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration. (f) The owner of any dangerous dog shall notify the Animal Control Department within twenty-four (24) hours if such dog is loose or missing; if such dog has attacked or wounded a human being or another animal; or if such dog has been sold, leased, given away, died, or custody has been transferred to another person for more than forty-eight (48) hours. If such dog has been sold, leased, given away, or custody has been so transferred, the owner shall provide the Animal Control Department with the name, address, and telephony number of the new owner, lessee, or custodian who shall be required to comply with the conditions of this Section if the dog is kept within the County. If the owner of a dangerous dog moves such dog to a different address, such owner shall notify the Animal Control Department of such fact and the new address within twenty-four (24) hours. (g) The animal control officer and/or police officer shall be permitted the right to inspect the enclosure in which any dangerous dog is kept at any time. (h) In addition to the conditions and specifications established by this Section with respect to dangerous dogs, the owner of any dangerous dog shall meet all other requirements established by this Article for keeping any dog. (i) The animal control officer and/or police officer shall have the right to seize and impound the dog if any of the 7 conditions and specifications established by this Section for the keeping of a dangerous dog are not being met. sec. 5-26.4. Violations. It shall be a Class 1 misdemeanor for the owner of any dog which has caused a wound to any person to conceal or cause to be concealed such dog from any animal control officer or police officer. sec. 5-26.5. Exceptions. (a) No dog shall be deemed or declared to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog if the threat, wound, injury or damage was caused by any person who, at the time, was (1) assaulting the owner of the dog, (2) committing a willful trespass or tort upon the premises of the owner of the dog, or (3) provoking, abusing, or assaulting the dog or can be shown to have repeatedly provoked, tormented, or abused the dog at other times. (b) No animal which, at the time of the acts complained of, was responding to pain or injury, or was protecting itself, its kennel, its offspring, or its owner's property, shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog. (c) This Section shall have no application to any dog owned by a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency. (d) No dog shall be found to be a dangerous dog or a vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed. 8 Sec. 5-44 Tax imposed. (a) An annual license tax is hereby imposed on dogs required to be licensed under this division in the following amounts: (6) Dangerous dog, as declared by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth: Fifty Dollars ($50.00) (in addition to the other applicable fees herein). 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McG. Strickland, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Roanoke County Family Court Services Philip Trompeter, Judge Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court 9 George Harris, Judge John L. Apostolou, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Michael Lazzuri, Court Services 10 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 5-21, DEFINITIONS, AND 5-44 TAX IMPOSED, ADDING SECTIONS 5-26.1 TO 5-26.5 AND REPEALING SECTION 5-26 OF ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAP- TER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO CONTROL DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~~~a~~~ ~ EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY: This ordinance will significantly strengthen Roanoke County Code provisions to respond to attacks by vicious or dangerous dogs. The amendments are consistent with recent changes to ordinances in adjoining jurisdictions. BACKGROUND' A series of savage attacks upon children and adults by dogs in the past few years in the Roanoke Valley has revealed deficiencies in the ability of the county's Animal Control Officers and the court system to impose reasonable controls on dogs which have demonstrated a propensity for attacks on humans or other animals. Roanoke County's Animal Control Officers have worked through the Public Safety Team to develop a comprehensive ordinance which defines dangerous and vicious dogs and establishes strict condi- tions for handling each category. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: The ordinance adds detailed definitions of "dangerous dog" and "vicious dog" to Sec. 5-21. The ordinance replaces the current Sec. 5-26 with a comprehensive series of sections which details the conditions under which a "dangerous dog" may be kept and how a "vicious dog" is to be disposed of. Criminal penalties are provided for under the new Sec. 5-26.1 to enforce these provisions and a separate licensure procedure for "dangerous dogs" is created by Sec. 5-26.2. In addition, a new license fee of $50.00 is mandated for owners of any dog found to be a "dangerous dog." Sec. 5-26.3 establishes detailed conditions which the owner of a K- "dangerous dog" must comply with and gives to the Animal Control Officers specific authority to enforce these provisions by inspections and impounding of the dog, if violated. Sec. 5-26.5 provides exceptions so as not to innocently impact unsuspecting dog owners. FISCAL IMPACTS' This may provide some incidental revenue to the county. ALTERNATIVES' 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Retain the present Sec. 5-26. "Vicious dogs." of the Roanoke County Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative # 1. Respectfully submitted, ~~x-Q-~V off. ~~e-~a,~-c.~ e Kenneth L. Hogan Chief Animal Control Officer Approved, ~ ~e Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs K- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 5-21, DEFINITIONS, AND 5-44 TAX IMPOSED, ADDING SECTIONS 5-26.1 TO 5-26.5 AND REPEALING SECTION 5-26 OF ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO CONTROL DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS. WHEREAS, injury or death to innocent children and adults has become a more serious problem in the Roanoke Valley in recent years; and WHEREAS, the current definition of vicious dog contained in Sec. 5-26 of the Roanoke County Code is not sufficiently detailed or comprehensive to deal with the many and varied situations which the County's Animal Control Officers are called upon to handle; and WHEREAS, neighboring jurisdictions to the County of Roanoke have recently amended their animal control ordinances to expand the power of their Animal Control Officers to deal with dangerous and vicious dogs; and WHEREAS the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 13, 1993; and the second reading on July 27, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. Dogs, Cats, and Other Animals of Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: ~-i sec. 5-21. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Dangerous doq: Any dog (1) which causes a wound to any person without provocation on public or private property; (2) which, while off the property of its owner, has killed a domestic animal; (3) which is owned or harbored primarily or in part for the purpose of dog fighting or any dog trained for dog fighting; (4) which, unprovoked, chases or approaches persons upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property other than the owner's property in a menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack; (5) which has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, to cause injury or otherwise to threaten the safety of human beings or domestic animals; or (6) which has been declared dangerous by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth. Any dog evidencing the characteristics or conduct described in subsections (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above shall be a "dangerous dog" even though not previously found dangerous by any Court. Vicious doa: Any dog which (1) kills a person; (2) inflicts serious wound to a person, including multiple bites, disfigurement, impairment of health, or impairment of any bodily function; (3) continues to exhibit the behavior which resulted in a previous finding by a Court that it is a dangerous dog; or ( 4 ) which has 2 K-I been found vicious by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth. Any dog evidencing the characteristics or conduct described in subsections (1), (2), or (3) above shall be a "vicious dog" even though not previously found vicious by any Court. Sec. 5-26.1. Dangerous dogs; vicious dog; penalties; procedures. (a) Dangerous dog. It shall be unlawful and a class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known to be a dangerous dog, as defined by Section 5-21, except in strict compliance with Section 5-26.3 of this Code. If after hearing evidence, the Court finds any dog to be a dangerous dog, the Court shall, in addition to any other penalties imposed, order the dog's owner to comply with the provisions of Section 5-26.3. If any owner knew or reasonably should have known any dog to be a dangerous dog and such dog thereafter causes a wound to any person, such owner shall be guilty 3 K~ of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (b) Vicious doa. It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor to own, keep, harbor, act as custodian of or permit to remain on or about any premises any dog that the owner knew or reasonably should have known to be a vicious dog, as defined by Section 5-21. If, after hearing evidence, the Court finds any dog to be a vicious dog, the Court shall, in addition to any other penalties imposed, order the animal control officer to euthanize the dog. If any owner knew or reasonably should have known any dog to be a vicious dog and such dog thereafter causes a wound to any person, such owner shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (c) Procedures. When a warrant has been obtained or a summons issued pursuant to this Section, the animal control officer and/or police officer may, in his discretion, confine the dog until such time as evidence shall be heard and a verdict rendered. The Court may, through its contempt power, compel the owner of any dog to produce it for the animal control officer and/or police officer. In the event any dog is found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog, the owner of such dog shall be responsible for payment to the County of any expenses of impounding and keeping the dog pending disposition of the case at the rate prescribed by the County Board of Supervisors. Sec. 5-26.2 Lioensure of dangerous dog. (a) The owner of any dog found by a Court to be a dangerous dog shall, within ten (10) days of such finding, obtain a dangerous 4 k-I dog license from the Treasurer by paying the fee required by Section 5-41 of this Code. The Treasurer shall provide the owner with a uniformly designed tag which identifies the dog as a dangerous dog. The owner shall affix the tag to the dog's collar and ensure that the dog wears collar and tag at all times. All licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall be renewed annually as required by Section 5-41 of this Code. (b) No dangerous dog license shall be issued until the applicant has filed with the Treasurer the insurance certificate required by Sec. 5-26.3(c). The Treasurer shall immediately forward such certificate to the County's Risk Manager for review and filing. The Risk Manager shall immediately notify the animal control officer of any noncompliance with the provisions of Sec. 5-26.3(c) of which the Risk Manager becomes aware. Sec. 5-26.3 Reepinq danq~rous dogs; conditions. It shall be unlawful for any owner of any dangerous dog to own, keep, or harbor any such dog within the County except in compliance with each of the following conditions and specifications: (a) Any dangerous dog shall be securely confined indoors or, if kept outdoors, shall be kept in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure adequate to confine the dog and located upon the premises of the owner of the dog. Any such pen or structure shall have secure sides and a secure top and, if it has no bottom secured to the sides, the sides shall be imbedded into the ground no less 5 K-I than two (2) feet. Such pen or structures shall provide any such dog with adequate space and protection from the elements and shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. (b) The owner of any dangerous dog shall display two (2) signs on his property stating: "Dangerous Dog on Premises." One sign shall be posted at the front of the property, and the second sign shall be posted at the rear of the property. Each sign shall be capable of being read from a distance of fifty (50) feet. (c) The owner of any dangerous dog shall procure and maintain public liability insurance in the amount of $50,000 insuring the owner for any injury or damage caused by such dog. The owner shall maintain a valid policy and certificate of insurance issued by the insurance carrier or agent as to the coverage required by this Subsection at the premises where such dog is kept and shall, upon request, display such policy and certificate to any animal control officer or police officer. (d) The owner of any dangerous dog shall have such dog permanently identified by means of a tatoo on an inside thigh, and the owner of any dangerous dog shall provide the animal control officer with a color photograph of the dog taken within the last twelve (12) months, suitable for use in identifying the dog. (e) If any dangerous dog is taken off the property of its owner, such dog shall be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash not exceeding six (6) feet in length, and such dog shall at all times be kept under the control of a responsible person. Such muzzle shall be constructed in such a manner that it 6 K-I will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal, but such that it will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration. (f) The owner of any dangerous dog shall notify the Animal Control Department within twenty-four (24) hours if such dog is loose or missing; if such dog has attacked or wounded a human being or another animal; or if such dog has been sold, leased, given away, died, or custody has been transferred to another person for more than forty-eight (48) hours. If such dog has been sold, leased, given away, or custody has been so transferred, the owner shall provide the Animal Control Department with the name, address, and telephone number of the new owner, lessee, or custodian who shall be required to comply with the conditions of this Section if the dog is kept within the County. If the owner of a dangerous dog moves such dog to a different address, such owner shall notify the Animal Control Department of such fact and the new address within twenty-four (24) hours. (g) The animal control officer and/or police officer shall be permitted the right to inspect the enclosure in which any dangerous dog is kept at any time. (h) In addition to the conditions and specifications established by this Section with respect to dangerous dogs, the owner of any dangerous dog shall meet all other requirements established by this Article for keeping any dog. (i) The animal control officer and/or police officer shall have the right to seize and impound the dog if any of the 7 K-I conditions and specifications established by this Section for the keeping of a dangerous dog are not being met. Sec. 5-26.4. Violations. It shall be a Class 1 misdemeanor for the owner of any dog which has caused a wound to any person to conceal or cause to be concealed such dog from any animal control officer or police officer. Sec. 5-26.5. Exceptions. (a) No dog shall be deemed or declared to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog if the threat, wound, injury or damage was caused by any person who, at the time, was (1) assaulting the owner of the dog, (2) committing a willful trespass or tort upon the premises of the owner of the dog, or (3) provoking, abusing, or assaulting the dog or can be shown to have repeatedly provoked, tormented, or abused the dog at other times. (b) No animal which, at the time of the acts complained of, was responding to pain or injury, or was protecting itself, its kennel, its offspring, or its owner's property, shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog. (c) This Section shall have no application to any dog owned by a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency. (d) No dog shall be found to be a dangerous dog or a vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed. 8 i<~ SeC. 5-44 Tab imposed. (a) An annual license tax is hereby imposed on dogs required to be licensed under this division in the following amounts: (6) Dangerous dog, as declared by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth: Fifty Dollars ($50.00) (in addition to the other applicable fees herein). 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its adoption. c:~wp51~agenda~vcousdog.ord 9 ACTION NO. / / ITEM NUMBER `! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: i. Community Corrections Resources Board One-year terms of Edmund J. Kielty, and Mrs. Chris Pickard, Alternate will expire August 31, 1993. Both are eligible for reappointment. Supervisor Eddy has requested that appointments to this Board be continued until the end of July. 2. Social Services Advisory Board Four-year term of the representative of the Hollins Magisterial District. Term will expire August 1, 1997. This is a new Board, established on June 22, 1993, replacing the Social Services Board. The Board is comprised of seven members, one representing each magisterial district, one liaison from the Board of Supervisors and a representative from the City of Salem. State Code recommends that the first terms be staggered so as to provide for the balanced overlapping of terms. Subsequent appointments shall be for a term of four years each. (See attached). Submitted by: Jd - Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~/ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: ~^~- § 63.1-42 WELFARE iSOCIAL SERVICES) § 63.1-44 § 63.1-42: Repealed by Acts 1977, c. 36. § 63.1-43. How local board of a city constituted. -The local board in each city shall be, at the discretion of the city council, either the officer in charge of the department or division of public welfare or a board consisting of five members appointed by the city council of such city in accordance with the provisions of § 63.1-39. If the officer in charge of the department or division of public welfare constitutes the local board, he may designate either his principal assistant, or the superintendent of public welfare or chief public assistance supervisor to act in his behalf, in his absence, with respect to approving, cancelling or changing grants made under the provisions of this title. (Code 1950, § 63-53.1; 1952, c. 409; 1956, c. 126; 1958, c. 195; 1968, c. 578; 1977, c. 36. § 63.1-43.1. Advisory boards. - A. If the governing body or bodies of a city or county or of the cities and counties participating in a district designate, under the provisions of §§ 63.1-40, 63.1-43 or § 63.1-44.1, the officer in charge of the department or division of public welfare as constituting the local board, such governing body or bodies shall appoint a board, committee or commission to serve in an advisory ca acityy to such officer with respect to the duties and functions imposed upon him by this title. Each such advisory body shall consist of no fewer than five and no mere than thirteen members. In the case of such board representing a district, there shall be at least one member on the board from each county and city in the district. The members shall be appointed initially for terms of from one to four years so as to provide for the balanced overlapping of the terms of the membership thereon. Subsequent appointments shall be for a term of four years each, except that appointments to fill vacancies shall be for the unexpired terms. No person shall serve more than two consecutive terms. The officer in charge of the department or division of public welfare shall be an ex officio member, without vote, of the advisory body. The advisory body shall elect its own chairman and shall meet at least bimonthly. In addition to regularly scheduled meetings, it may meet at the call of the chairman or on the petition of at least one-half of the members. B. The powers and duties of the advisory body shall be as follows: 1. To interest itself in all matters pertaining to the social welfare of the people of the city or county served by it; 2. To monitor the formulation and implementation of social welfare programs in the city or county; 3. To meet with the officer in charge of the department or division of public welfare at least four times a year for the purpose of making recommendations on policy matters concerning the department or division; 4. To make an annual report to the governing body, concurrent with the budget presentation of the department or division, concerning the administra- tion of the public welfare program; and 5. To submit to the governing body, from time to time, other reports that the advisory body deems appropriate. (1977, c. 36; 1981, c. 264; 1984, c. 586; 1989, c. 356. ) ~ 63.1-44. Local boards representing two or more political subdivi- sione. -The provisions of §§ 63.1-40 and 63.1-43 notwithstanding, the State Board, with the prior consent of the Governor, may establish districts consisting of two or more counties and/or cities. Except as provided in ~ 63.1-44.1 there shall be one board of not less than three nor more than nine members for each such district. There shall be at least one member of the board from each county and city in the district. Additional representation ,~ ~ ,. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-8 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED A8 ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 27, 1993, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Appointments to Social Services Advisory Board. 2. Resolution of Support and Endorsement of Richmond County's Resolution for Continued State Funding of Programs to Accelerate the Installation of Dry Fire Hydrants. 3. Donation of Water and Sanitary Sewer Easement on Parcel A, Located on Glen Heather Drive. 4. Donation of Drainage Easement in Connection with Homeland Hills Road Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: cc: File Arnol Cliff Social T. C. d Covey, Director, Craig, Director, Services File Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Engineering & Inspections Utility Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue ACTION NO. A-72793-8.a ITEM NUMBER ~'f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Social Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIIKARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the July 13, 1993 meeting. 1. Social Services Advisory Board This is a new Board replacing the Social Services Board. Supervisor Minnix nominated Betty Lucas to a four-year term to represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Her term will expire August 1, 1997. Supervisor Kohinke nominated Ed Wold to a four-year term to represent the Catawba Magisterial District. His term will expire August 1, 1997. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ ~ . Mary H. llen ~lr~ Elmer C. Hodge Clerk --------------------------------- County Administrator ------------------------ ------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Social Services Advisory Board File 4 ~.:' e' . l'^ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-8.b OF SIIPPORT AND ENDORSEMENT OF RICHMOND COIINTY'S RESOLIITION FOR CONTINIIED STATE FIINDING OF PROGRAMS TO ACCELERATE THE INSTALLATION OF DRY FIRE HYDRANTS WHEREAS, a dry hydrant is a nonpressurized pipe system that is installed in an existing lake, pond, or stream to provide an easily accessible source of year-round water for firefighting; and WHEREAS, with installation of dry fire hydrants, homeowners and property owners would receive improved fire protection that would reduce loss of life and property; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly passed legislation in 1992 which requested a plan be developed that identified the needed network of dry hydrant sites in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Forestry completed an inventory that documented the need for 3,678 dry hydrant installations at an estimated cost of $7.3 million; and WHEREAS, the state appropriated funds to be spent in FY 1993 and FY 1994 to initiate a demonstration program which provided cost share monies to fire departments to install dry hydrants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports and endorses the Richmond County Board of Supervisors' resolution for continued state funding of programs which encourage and enable fire departments to install dry hydrants; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requests that the Virginia Association of Counties add to their 1994 legislative agenda a resolution of support for state funding of programs that enable and encourage fire departments to accelerate the installation of dry fire hydrants. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File T. C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Franklin Hanks, Chairman, Virginia Association RC&D Councils The Honorable W. D. Gray, Chairman, Richmond County Board of Supervisors James D. Campbell, Executive Director, VACo ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER M-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Endorsing Richmond County's Resolution for Continued State Funding of Programs to Accelerate the Installation of Dry Fire Hydrants COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,% ~ ~,s SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Franklin Hanks, Chairman, Virginia Association Resource Conservation and Development Councils, has asked for support and endorsement of Richmond County's Resolution for continued state funding of programs which encourage and enable fire departments to install dry fire hydrants. It is also requested that Roanoke County support their request that the Virginia Association of Counties add this to the 1994 legislative agenda. Fire and Rescue Chief T. C. Fuqua advises that Roanoke County has participated in the grant program and received funding for one dry hydrant on a pond in the Catawba area. He anticipates seeking additional funds for hydrants at other locations, and favors supporting the continuation of state funding of this program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board adopt the attached resolution and send copies to Mr. Hanks, the Honorable W. D. Gray, Chairman, Richmond Board of Supervisors, and James D. Campbell, Executive Director, VACo. rYl- ~ Approved by, ~/ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION OF SIIPPORT AND ENDORSEMENT OF RICHMOND COUNTY~B RESOLUTION FOR CONTINUED STATE FUNDING OF PROGRAMS TO ACCELERATE THE INSTALLATION OF DRY FIRE HYDRANTS WHEREAS, a dry hydrant is a nonpressurized pipe system that is installed in an existing lake, pond, or stream to provide an easily accessible source of year-round water for firefighting; and WHEREAS, with installation of dry fire hydrants, homeowners and property owners would receive improved fire protection that would reduce loss of life and property; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly passed legislation in 1992 which requested a plan be developed that identified the needed network of dry hydrant sites in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Forestry completed an inventory that documented the need for 3,678 dry hydrant installations at an estimated cost of $7.3 million; and WHEREAS, the state appropriated funds to be spent in FY 1993 and FY 1994 to initiate a demonstration program which provided cost share monies to fire departments to install dry hydrants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports and endorses the Richmond County Board of Supervisors' resolution for continued state funding of programs which encourage and enable fire departments to install dry hydrants; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requests that the Virginia Association of Counties add rna to their 1994 legislative agenda a resolution of support for state funding of programs that enable and encourage fire departments to accelerate the installation of dry fire hydrants. IIIRG~NIA ASSOCIATION l~;~ ANO July 12, 1993 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: ~ , .' ~ , 7 ~- ..- ~__ ` _ 1 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS The New River-Highlands RC&D Council, in cooperation with the Virginia Association of RC&D Councils, is seeking support of the 1994 General Assembly in an effort to accelerate the program of dry fire hydrants for rural fire protection. A brochure on dry hydrants is enclosed for your information. Over the past two years, $250,000 has been appropriated to the Virginia Department of Forestry for this purpose. We are asking that the Roanoke Board of Supervisors support and endorse the Richmond County Resolution (attached) at your next meeting. We are requesting full support and cooperation from every county concerning the dry fire hydrant program. Please notify VACo with an expression of your action prior to their August meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have additional questions please call Gary Boring, Project Coordinator, at 703-228-2879. Please provide me a copy of your response to VACo. Sincerely, Franklin Hanks, Chairman Virginia Association RC&D Councils Enclosures 110 W. S~ill.er Street wy};hevi 1_le, V11 2~13E37_ Phone: 703-22B-2F379 }~n`~: 703-22E3-x}367 ACTION NO. A-72793-8.c ITEM NO. T/YI_~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water an Parcel A, located on Board of Supervisors o COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: d sanitary sewer easement on Glen Heather Drive to the f Roanoke County This consent agenda item involves the donation of a new sanitary sewer and water line easement, of variable width, upon, over, under and across Parcel A (Plat Book 11, Page 155), located on Glen Heather Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, from Radford & Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation (Tax Map No. 76.07-2-52), as shown on a plat dated April 30, 1993, made by Lumsden Associates, P. C., a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Re pe tfully submitted, is ie L. f an Assistant County Attorney /?1-3 Action Approved (X) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Nickens x Minnix x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections rAx x76.07 .2-48 n'arroNa; PGiOr'&iiTY 'NVE"'~R;'~ n, ~. 121~i PG, 451 ~' ' `n -G~,F QJ~ r ~~ TAx* 76.07- 2- 50 rRCY hi. P~ h"IAR~ qNN /,WYN ~ Ih, I Z H'~ ('U. Fc 11 644^07 ~nc°w= n 187.d'D' ~f,; Y' J v r ~•~ r1 r4x # 76.G~- 2-y~ 1.036 AGR~ ~ ~°~ h~ANAaWh'~,NT ~ A'~ ~r1 e~~ Q.n h ~'~ .`YI~T ~7Zi: ;~~'A7~ 1,r!~,`, cA~"~'+'~~NT r-iv PLIk;;r=~ „C ~~ t~ ~~' 'C ~,'~ r1 l- y In~ i T~ ~': Yi~l/a jE~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r~;. ~ ~ :. / ~~ ?-57! T o. a.._ ' ~ NEW SAN! .CRY ~' ~ • - ,, -- ~ ., ~. T ~ _ . a , pi,1, ~~~ NEW SANITARY SEWER & WATER LINE EASEMENT CORNI?RS IiI:ARING S DIS'l'ANCI. -_-1-2 _.___. _ .\ lt;° lt3'07" G 11+7.'+i' 2-3 CII V ~,y°~Z' 3U" 1; Zb. I V' ~ '~-? 5 ll° 5'i~" k 103.0' 6-7 S t6°3t3'U7" W 28.UU' i `T'OTAL _~RI_:A_fi?UAI.S _+$.77 ti.I'.____J Via,-,i~ LEGAL REFERENCE: ~;~ Ct)RNI:R~~I~O~J D.B. 1394, PAGE 1162 CI'RVIi llA"PA 4 = 3°~3'S6" R = 31i5.0U 1' = l3. lU A = 26.20 CH = 26.19 CH BI?ARING = N 6i3°22' 3U" I? PLAT SHOWING EXISTING 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT TO B% VACATED BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND NEW SANITARY SEWER & WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE SITUATED ON PARCiL A (P.B. 11, PAGE 155) PROPERTY OP ~~.~~..~~ RADF'ORD & ASSOCIATES, INC., A VIRGINIA CORPORATION ~A1,TN-~Fr~y} WI~;DSOR II-.ILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT O~i`~ GJ~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ ~~ : sCALF_ i- 50 ~ ~nTE APRIL 30, 1993 'o VINCENT K . , ~~" 314288 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNE~:F3S ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM i/ 9 ~ . BO /1?-3 ~~ ACTION NO. A-72793-8.d ITEM N0. ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement in connection with the Homeland Hills Road Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This consent agenda item involve the donation of the following easement to the County of Roanoke for drainage purposes in relation to the Homeland Hills Road Project in the Vinton Magisterial District. a) Donation of an easement from William J. Brown and Sharon Brown, (Deed Book 1299, page 497) (Tax Map No. 89.00) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering and Inspections Department, dated September 28, 1992. The location and dimension of this property has been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends acceptance of this property. SU ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~~/ ~ . Arno d Covey, D' etor Elmer C. Hodge Engineering & Inspecti ns County Administrator /n-~ --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x To Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ;,+~ PROPERTY ~F R~DNEY C. & PAULA J. MINTER TAX MAP N0. 89.00-4-19 NATURAL WATERCOURSE 32.89' ~° N 80°37,1g~ E 42050" '°o ~~ 34~ PROPOSED ~,9 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ j~ e ~ LOT 6A ~ - ~ s ' PR^PERTY ^F~ WILLIAM BR^WN P. B. 9 PG. 18 B ~ N ~ S 9° ~0~ S ,tit O I ~S 1 ~~~. ~• gs, ~2 w A 5 3 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHARD BEARING A 279.73' 102.46' 101.89' S 40'07'58" W B 25.00' 34.97' 32.19' N 06°27'30' E TAX MAP N0. $9.00-4-17 _____ SCALE:_ 1"=50' PLAT SHOWING DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED T^ RQAN~KE COUNTY BY WILLIAM BRAWN PREPARED BY.• RDANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE:_ 09 _28=92 ~- 3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY July 13, 1993 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 Clerk of Circuit Court New Position $100,000 26 400 Balance as of July 27, 1993 Submitted by ~. ~~ 73 600 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~) COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Unaudited) Original 1993-94 Budget Previously reserved for employee benefits and new administration building Original 1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve Balance at July 27, 1993 Submitted By $4,512,763 (886,182) 80.668 $3,7_ % of General Fund Expenditures 4.8% Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447). -~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE July 13, 1993 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 $90,464 (Unaudited) Northside High School Ball Fields 62 DDD Balance as of July 27, 1993 $~~ Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -June 1993 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 6/04/93 6/18/93 $2,197,072.00 $ 476,501.25 466,252.19 942,753.44 $3,139,825.44 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ,~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: C._i~ U Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER 1 '' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Private SSE/R Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This report includes inspections on Oriole Lane, Chaparral Drive, Flamingo Drive, Mallard Drive, Bobolink Lane, Woodwarbler Lane, Purple Finch Road, Skylark Circle, Hummingbird Lane, Sandpiper Drive and Waxwing Circle. Notices to the first group of property owners were sent on August 18, 1992. The installation of cleanouts and property inspection were started on August 31, 1992 after authorization for internal inspection was received. As of July 15, 1993 the following has been accomplished: Notification letters sent to homeowner Authorization received from homeowner cleanouts installed Internal/External inspections completed Dye injection test completed Properties completed Properties completed with problems noted 175 173 98.9% 138 78.9% 160 91.4% 125 71.4% 126 720 53 42 % NOTE: (1) There was one less dye injection test conducted than properties completed due to one home with severe cracks in walls and floor. Dye injection of this home could cause damage. (2) An additional nineteen properties have problems noted but will not be classified or counted until all inspections are completed on their facilities. ~. 5 The 53 completed properties with infiltration/inflow ( I/I ) problems can be classified as follows: * Nineteen I/I contributors, estimated to be less than 500 gallons per day each but more than 50 gallons per day. * Twenty one I/I contributors, estimated to be less than 1,000 gallons per day but more than 500 gallons per day each. * Thirteen I/I contributors, in excess of 1,000 gallons per day each. Problems found are as follows, not necessarily in order of severity: (1) Subgrade floor and walls with cracks and stains. (2) Water flow under doorways to floor drains. (3) Areaways with cracks and evidence of inflow of ground water to drain. (4) Failed joints in the sewer laterals. (5) Sheared laterals at foundation due to settling. (6) Positive on dye injection test for foundation drainage to sewer. (7) Connections of Subgrade drainage to floor drain. (Pick Holes) (8) Sump pumps for foundation drainage to sewer. The above mentioned I/I sources would cause surcharging of the sewer line and sewer backup in low areas during moderate to heavy rainfall under saturated conditions. Long term surcharging and backup would occur during flooding periods. One resident has challenged in court our legal right to inspect property. Until the court has made a final determination in this matter, staff has not sent notice to make corrections to any of the above mentioned 53 property owners. After receiving the court's determination relative to our right to make inspections, staff will bring this matter back to the Board for direction. ~.5 SUBMITTED BY: __,_~ 1 ~ ~ Clifford a'~, P.E. C. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge " County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the projected/actual activity of ,the various work components (Attachment B). FISCAL IMPACT• None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, 1~ J n M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A July 27, 1993 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY {~-I~ Schematic design phase has progressed on schedule. Library staff has been pleased with the project design team's basic concepts, flexibility and responsiveness. Work sessions have been devoted to refinement of basic design elements and the initial furniture layouts. Interior elevations and a detailed site plan are scheduled for review in early July. DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL Request for proposals for engineering services are being reviewed by the Selection Committee. ROADS Adams Construction Company is to start plant mix projects on July 12, 1993. VDOT is actively pursuing right of ways for incident projects. VALLEY TECHPARK The Preliminary Engineering Report was completed in June. The Industrial Access request to VDOT was approved in June. The construction plans and preliminary quantities were submitted to VDOT on July 1, 1993. The VDOT Industrial Access Office in Richmond has forwarded the county/state government agreement to the Attorney General's Office for review. The local VDOT office anticipates bidding this project in August/September. Mrs. Helen Cox-Richards has agreed to sell the County/IDA a .48 acre tract for $10,000. This acreage along with the property owned by Mr. Edward Bruce Hill is needed for the industrial access entrance. Mr. Hill's attorney, Jim Buchholtz, is in the process of obtaining approval of our project from SPCA per Mr. Hill's request. FIRE HYDRANTS ~~~ As of this date, all hydrant locations have been identified, all maps are complete and meetings have been held with all juridictions affected by this project. The accounty has been established, the hyrdant specifications are complete and are out for bid with a return date of July 14. This project is ahead of schedule by two months. PARKS AND RECREATION Northside -Engineering work has been completed. The piping contractor is installing the storm water drainage system, sanitary sewer line and domestic water line for the property. Bids are being solicited for the grading work which we hope to complete in July so that seeding may occur during the summer. Bonsack Park -The engineering is nearing completion for the development of a baseball field at this site. The school is assisting in obtaining the appropriate access to this site. Staff met with the community civic league to obtian input in the play apparatus ansd picnic shelter scheduled for this site. Various stages of work will occur during this summer. Lighting -Bids were opened on June 11 for the lighting of the five sports complexes in Roanoke County. The bid has been awarded for the lighting of the three soccer fields at Vinyard Park which is scheduled to be completed for the Fall 1993 season. The remainder of the bids for Starkey Park, Career Center Field, William Byrd Baseball Field and Garst Mill Park will be awarded in early July. Starkey Park -The baseball field has been constructed, the piping installed to improve drainage in the middle of the park, and the soccer field re-oriented to provide two soccer fields at this site. Future work will include correcting erosion problems along the creek to preserve our investment in this park and providing utilities for future restroom facilities. Tennis Court Renovations -The consultant has completed the study and prepared the specifications to allow the repairs to the various facilities. Bids for the renovation will be received in July to allow repairs to begin in the summer of 1993. Ball Field Fencina - Technical specifications have been prepared and the inventory of fencing needs has been established. Bids will be taken to repair fences and to establish the fencing cost for new ball fields. Repairs at Craig Center -Bids have been received for handicap access and installation of a new HVAC system. Repairs should begin in July. Handicao Access to Walrond Office Building (Cabin) -Repairs have been completed. 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,500,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: SPENCER WTTS S 14,444.20 ACCOUNT CODE: 104030 ~- b TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR A & E PLANNED PROPOSALS ACTUAL BIDS PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Schematic design phase has progressed on schedule. Library staff has been pleased with the project design team's basic concepts, flexibility and responsiveness. Work sessions have been devoted to refinement of basic design elements and the initial furniture layouts. Interior elevations and a detailed site plan are scheduled for review in early July. 1 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 2,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104040 '~ b TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR ............ MAY ............ JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR RfP PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES ACTUAL SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL P RELIMINARY PLANN ED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPAR E PLANNED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE PLANNED FOR BIDS ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED COMPLETION ACTUAL PROJECT PLANNED CLOSEWT ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Request for proposals for engineering services are being reviewed by the Selection Committee. 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 90,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCN WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 ~f -lo TASK ~ DESIGN ~ PLANNED MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL BID, PRE-BID PLANNED CONFERENCE ACTUAL AWARD PLANNED CONTRACT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR COMMENTS: 1. No easements needed. 2. Coordinate with VDOT (95% Project in VDOT RW) 3 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY BUDGET $ 75,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: CONTRACT S 97,500 BUTCH MORKMAN EXPENDITURES TO DATE ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 "-~-b TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR DESIGN PHASE PLANNED 1 & II ACTUAL MEET W/VDOT PLANNED & CITIZENS PHASE I ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS - PHASE II AWARD CONTR.- PHASE I ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. Phase I Murray Run below F & W Bldg. F (Upstream from Phase II) 3. Phase II Trunk line along Colony Ln. & drainage easement 4. Discuss curb & gutter option w/VDOT along portion of Colony Ln. 5. Phase I - 57,500 from F 8 W & 515, 000 from Drainage Budget; Phase II - 575,000 from Bond 6. P-120 to be constructed with Phase I1 7. Phase I to be constructed under hourly rate contract. 4 ~~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 300,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE- 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APPLY FOR PLANNED FEMA GRANT OF MATCHING FUNDS ACTUAL RFP PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES ACTUAL S ELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED WATERSHED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL PLANNED POLICY ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED INVESTIGATION ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The County is awaiting notification from FEMA on approval of matching monies. 6 ~-b BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JONM CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104209, 104201, 104203 104204 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR WALROND PARK PLANNED 31 000 ~IfG ~~EFs BtD E~QN ~~'~f3N >E~N SOCCER FIELD ACTUAL ~~i~i'+~# 4-ALR N 0 D PARK PLANNE D 2 00 : iPI::: iSN.: ,,SON i5li. 2 BASEBALL . .., .. ::. FIELDS ACTUAL >~~{ NORTHSIDE PLANNED 52 000 ~GOi1~s ''GL~N ~ON REALIGN FIELDS ACTUAL 8 898 >LNG`#` `~~~~~:''. <~'~GQI#>~> BONSACK PARK PLANNED 20 000 '~ttiN€' ~~SN€' ;'~G~tiH€ BALL FIELD ACTUAL EI~~~ ~:i}#i' BONSACK PARK PLANNED 15 000 :::G('fE!'~~ ............ ~~~~iSN~~:> ............. `.>~i58~~~~ ............ PICNIC SHELTER ACTUAL 11~G »f#~r:: BONSACK PARK PLANNED 10 000 ~GCIN~~ ':'£~N 35E PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ACTUAL V N I YARD PAR K I PAN L NED 2 00 ~ lD::: . ~:GfIN::: ........... :;:GON::~: .......... :=:>eElH: 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150 000 ':GaN'.' ~ ~Qli>: >:~~E<:: LIGHT SOCCER FIELD ACTUAL 8 413 ~1~Ci~~" `~'~iX€ ~`:~f~': TOTAL PLANNED 402 000 ACTUAL COMMENTS: Northside - Engineering work has been completed. The piping contractor is installing the storm water drainage system, sanitary sewer line and domestic water line for the property. Bids are being solicited for the grading work which we hope to complete in July so that seeding may occur during the summer. Bonsack Park -The engineering is nearing completion for the development of a baseball field at this site. The school is assisting in obtaining the appropriate access to this site. Staff met with the community civic league to obtain input in the play apparatus and picnic shelter scheduled for this site. Various stages of work will occur during this summer. 7 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 '~1 -6 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104204, 104210, 104212 104205, 104207 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25 000 EkIG ~~ENG BID ~~G1fN G[lN PARKING ACTUAL VINYARD PAR K I PLANNE D 25 000 iSN€€ tOH;; 3 RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL VINYARD PARK I P CANNED 50 000 ....::;. ;: B.iD;.;: : GIIN::: :::ELlN::: LIGHT BASEBALL ACTUAL V INYARD PARK I PLANNED 5 00 G 1rkG ii7. ~N,.: tiN CONCESSION/ .. .. STORAGE ACTUAL MT. PLEASANT PLANNED 40 000 ~~~~ ............ :8j~0:: ............ :~~~fj>: . PARK BALL . ........... FIELD ACTUAL STON B E RIDGE PK PLANNED 25 000 . .........:. : ~F~.::. : EQN.:: ::CON.:: RESTROOM UTIL. . ACTUAL BYRD SCHOOL PLANNED 60 000 >£ffll` ............ ::C~N~~_ ............ i1~~:: LIGHT BASEBALL . ............ FIELD ACTUAL <~NG~'` ~~~~ ~:~Itk' u HISPERING P AN L NED 1 00 PINES PK. BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL 632 TOTAL PLANNED 281,000 ACTUAL COMMENTS: Lighting - Bids were opened on June 11 for the lighting of five sports complexes in Roanoke County. The bid has been awarded for the lighting of the three soccer fields at Vinyard Park which is scheduled to be completed for the Fall 1993 season. The remainder of the bids for Starkey Park, Career Center Field, William Byrd Baseball Field and Garst Mill Park will be awarded in early July. 8 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 -~-~ PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104207, 104211, 104206, 104213, 104202 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR WHISPERING PLANNED 60,000 ;<~j~Oz»`:'ENG:z;'~jj»>>'Oj~~:«`.'`" CQfi PINES - LIGHT BALLFIELD ACTUAL WH[SP ERING PLANNED 5 00 >~'>:;; E...~.:: :>:::>: ...8 iil... G~~ > GIN:: ^ ~GQN> PINES - RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL u HISPE RING A L NNED 6 0 0 PINES -TENNIS/ BASKETBALL CT ACTUAL GR EEN HI LL PK LANN ED 0 00 :.. ..i:N~s:. : # iii:: ON ON 2 PICNIC ... ... ... ::: SHELTERS ACTUAL GARST MILL PK P A L NNED 24 0 00 ~ i5b1.:: 1SE :. LIGHT 2 BALL . : ::: FIELDS ACTUAL ::EB~r~: :~Fi3€:€:€ f::BTL?': WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 50 000 >g AREA PURCHASE LAND ACTUAL WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62 000 ~~~ £~1G g}~' AREA - 2 BALL FIELDS ACTUAL STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62 000 GQN`~ ~~t3~E 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL 22,656 t1~f TOTAL PLANNED 449 000 ACTUAL 12,829 COMMENTS: Starkey Park - The baseball field has been constructed, the piping installed to improve drainage in the middle of the park, and the soccer field re-oriented to provide two soccer fields at this site. Future work will include correcting erosion problems along the creek to preserve our investmnet in this park and providing utilities for future restroom facilities. 9 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 ~'-b PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104202, 104214, 104218, 104220, 104219 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR STARKEY PARK PLANNED 31 000 ~~~::::: . :;::::ECG:?" g 1 BASEBALL . .......... ............. ............ FIELD ACTUAL STARK EY PAR K P CANNED 2 0 00 .: .~NGz: ~~i«: LIGHT 1 FIELD ACTUAL ~#C> BiD€' '>':BTi~:€:: S TARKEY P ARK LANN ED 5 000 ~: ~~ ~~ ~ ON." RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210 400 $'0`~~ ~~ir~ifi'~ >':>«<': ;EisW::: .::::..:.:.:: :;#NG: RENOVATIONS ACTUAL 1, 000 LNG<€ €€11~G':€ €€~ENG':' BALL FIELD PLANNED 62 000 €€E~l1``' '~~~ g'p FENCING ACTUAL <<1~EG'.< F ACILI TY P CANNED 1 00 0 G.. ~ffl.:. tSN :. ~O N ::: REPAIRS . . .. CRAIG AVENUE ACTUAL 7 745 <E1~G F AGILITY PLANN ED 1 000 :1r~f~ tD: :GON::: ::GON:::; REPAIRS LEISURE ARTS ACTUAL FACI CITY P CANNED 4 500 ~Et~Gs>! ::::::::>: ENG: :iD:: :G}7W:~'_ QN::: REPAIR S WALRON D OFC. A CTUAL 2 115 TOTAL PLANNED 446 900 ACTUAL 2,115 COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations - The consultant has completed the study and prepared the specifications to allow the repairs to the various facilities. Bids for the renovation will be received in July to allow repairs to begin in the summer of 1993. Ball Field Fencing - Technical specifications have been prepared and the inventory of fencing needs has been established. Bids will be taken to repair fences and to establish the fencing cost for new ball fields. 10 -(c BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104221, 104216, 104217, 104208 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR ADA ACC ESS PLANNED 5 100 .. .. .. ACTUAL GROUND COVER PLANNED 42 000 ENG ~#D< GON> ~t]N G13F1; FOR PLAY- GROUND EQUIP. ACTUAL INFI ELD SURF PLANNED 4 00 0 L'1N'': MATERIALS F OR BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL 5,100 CQN CAREER CENTER PLANNED 60 000 ENG' <8`fII ~''EQN Gi~H REPLACE LIGHTS ACTUAL '.ENG~ 1IIO BIO TOTAL PLANNED 171 000 ACTUAL 5,100 COMMENTS: Repairs at Craig Center - Bids have been received for handicap access and installation of a new HVAC system. Repairs should begin in July. Handicap Access to taalrond Office euildina (Cabin) - Repairs have been completed. 11 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 ROAD PROJECTS ~- ~O BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 500,000 S 500,000.00 E 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: ARNOLD COVET ACCOUNT CODE: 104070 TASK VDOT PREPARES PLANNED BIDS ACTUAL VDOT PLANNED ADVERTISES ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS PLANNED CONTRACT ON ALL PROJECTS (57> ACTUAL ALL PROJECTS PLANNED CONSTRUCTED ~ COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR COMMENTS: Adams Construction Company is to start Plant mix projects July 12, 1993. Incident projects - VDOT is actively pursuing right of way. 12 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: TIM GUBALA ACCOUNT CODE: ~~ TASK MASTER PLAN PLANNED ACTUAL LAND PLANNED ACQUISITION/ EXCHANGE ACTUAL DETAIL PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ACCESS REQUEST ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED BIDS ACTUAL START ROAD, PLANNED UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR COMMENTS: The Preliminary Engineering Report was completed in June. The Industrial Access request to VDOT was approved in June. The construction plans and preliminary quantities were submitted to VDOT on Juty 1, 1993. The VDOT Industrial Access Office in Richmond has forwarded the county/state government agreement to the Attorney General's Office for review. The local VDOT office anticipates bidding this project in August/September. Mrs. Helen Cox-Richards has agreed to sett the County/1DA a .48 acre tract for $10,000. This acreage along with the property owned by Mr. Edward Bruce Hill is needed for the industrial access entrance. Mr. Hill's attorney, Jim Buchholtz, is in the process of obtaining approval of our project from SPCA per Mr. Hill's request. 13 -~- C~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 FIRE HYDRANTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 184,000 To be awarded the end of November None until August PROJECT COORDINATOR: RON EDWIRDS ACCOUNT CODE: TASK PREPARE SITE 1 PLANNED LOCATION MAPS ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE ACTUAL HYRDRANTS BID FIRE PLANNED HYRDRANTS ACTUAL BID PLANNED INSTALLATION OF HYDRANTS ACTUAL INSTALLATION PLANNED ACTUAL FINAL INSP., PLANNED ACCEPTANCE & PROJECT ACTUAL COMPLETION TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR COMMENTS: As of this date all hydrant locations have been identified, all maps are complete and meetings have been held with all jurisdictions affected by this project. The account has been established, the hydrant specifications are complete and are out for bid with a return date of July 14. This project is ahead of schedule by two months. 14 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 27, 1993 PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 750,000 S 240,121.01 PROJECT COORDINATORS: JOHN CHAMBL[SS AND HOMER DUFF ACCOUNT CODE: 155140 ~~ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR PURCHASE OF PLANNED 750 000 LAND ACTUAL 240 121 TOTAL PLANNED 750 000 ACTUAL 240 121 COMMENTS: The first of several tracts of land to be purchased for the eventual building of anew Cave Spring High School has been completed. The site is located immediately in front of Penn Forest Elementary School and across from Starkey Park. Although there are no immediate plans to construct the school, the land will be preserved for the eventual development and will be used for Parks and Recreational purposes until that time. The acquisition cost including testing for the 28 acres tract was E240,121.01. Meetings are being scheduled with other property owners concerning the remaining tracts of land. 15 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-9 CERTIFYING E%ECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J~G~~..~:.~T11~-~ Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session Wllllllllilllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllll~lllllllullllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111~ .c. - - - - - -_ - -_ - -_ -_ - - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~7 - ~ - - - - - - - - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - _ - -_ - = SUB CT: - - ~ - - ~ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - - - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -_ - NAME _ ~~V~~ ~- - - - - - - - - - - _ -_ - - = ADDRESS Jr' fir] ~yl ~N~ ~l,OQ7L-~„ - -_ - - - _ ~~ ~/ _ - - - PHONE ~~D - Zo,~ ~ - _ - Illllllillllllilllllllilllllllllllllillllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllliililillillillllllillilllliillillilllillllllllim 1U11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111illilll~lllllllllllllllllilillillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~jj~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - ~ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - - - =_ _ - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - = SUBJECT: ~~~T~ ~/~' r~dorn 7~~~r'S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - _ _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - _ _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ - NAME ~~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~D/t~ - - ... - - - ADDRESS 9.~'.~ /~%~'~~~i~x G..Z/?C'G /;' - _ PHONE ~.~/t1 ~D/ti/, ~/~ ~ ~/ ~ Ililllilllllllilllllllilllilllilllllllllillilllllillillllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllilillilllllllllllllllllilllllllliilllillim _~iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiii~~iiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _~ _ _ _ _ -~ _ _ _ _ __ __ - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~--~ - - - - - - _. _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - = SUBJECT: ~ R D ~ ev ~ ~ ~ ~'~- m ~ M v ' ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ =_ - - Iwould like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me Burin the - g - meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - NAME /3~ A ~ ~ U L TCi~/ ~'rC ~'~' - - _ - ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~=,~ ~/= ~ ~ ~ ~ ,y = - - - - -_ _ - - PHONE __ ~ 7 ~ G S~ ~ _~ ~iiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiuiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ~, _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ = - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ ~ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _- -_ - ~--- - c ~~~~ - _ - SUBJECT: ~ -2 ~ - - __ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _, WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - _ - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - _ - _ - - - - _ - -_ - - - ~ - - NAME L-, e~ C. ~ 1`E--n~ I ~ - __ - - ~~ - - ADDRESS ~So ~ - - ~~ ~~ ~ ~ - - - - - -_ __ - - - PHONE _ J~C~ 3 - ~ 7D 5~ _ - 1UII~~Ilalllllillllllllillll11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIiI~ ~~ _ ~- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ - - - - PUBLIC HEARING "ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - - = SUB CT: - ~ - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - - -. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ -_ =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - - - c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _- - NAME ~ o r- "" .~ - - _ a ~l ~~/q 1r Y e,~ ~. - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS f~.5 2 ~ N . ~G y ~~-- l - _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - PHONE 7U3 - 2 Cp ~ - I C~ `~ - - - illllllilllllllllllllllllllllililllilliiliillllllilllllllllllilillllllliillllllllllllllilillilllllllllllllllilllllllllillllillll~ ~Illllllllllllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllll~llllllll~IIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ~..~~r = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~% I ~ -~~° ~~ c APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c _ _ SUBJECT: ,,~',-,-," ~' . ~ ~~ ~~° /'_~ jz ~ ~/~ ~~ r~r.~ ~~~, -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ c = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between. three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ - _ _ NAME :.~~ ~~~-~ f~. ~~~ r~ ~U z ~. ~f ADDRESS ~3 f, a_-/ ~/~~'.~Fc~ f, ,~~ ~-,;,, ~= _--- PHONE ? ~ ~ _ 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~/l miiliilllllllililllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllilllllllllllllllillililllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllll~ 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ""1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and First Reading on Proposed Amend- ments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Accommodate Amateur Radio Towers in All Zoning Districts. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The planning staff and representatives of the amateur radio people have worked very hard to reach the compromise that is included in the ordinance. 1 recommend approval of the compromise as contained in the agenda item. SUMMARY: On July 12 staff met with representatives of the amateur radio operators to discuss revisions to the zoning ordinance to allow amateur radio towers. After a lengthy discussion, a modified version of the proposal considered on June 8 was developed. The product of this meeting is incorporated into the attached ordi- nance These ordinance provisions were unanimously supported by those at the meeting as a reasonable compromise between the provisions previously considered and no regulation at all. They have received a copy of these modified provisions and indicated they would support this ordinance at your meeting on July 27. BACKGROUND: On June 8, 1993, the Board of Supervisors considered this item for first reading. After considerable public comment, the Board continued the first reading until July 13, which was later extended to July 27. The Board instructed the staff to consider the comments received and work with the amateur radio operators to revise the proposed amendments to reasonably accommo- date amateur radio towers. The Board also requested staff to research how other jurisdictions have addressed this issue. As directed, the staff reviewed the oral and written comments and revised the proposed provisions. In summary, these revisions include setting maximum heights by right to 65 feet in residential districts and 100 feet in Agricultural districts for amateur radio towers. Any tower exceeding these heights would require a special use permit. Two different height limits are set to give amateur operators flexibility in locating where more favorable provisions for towers exist. The heights selected represent the more typical S•I 2 tower heights installed. These heights are also generally consistent with the existing height limitations imposed on other buildings and structures allowed in the various zoning districts. In addition, the setback required from adjoining residences was reduced from 110 percent to 40 percent of the height of the tower based on technical documentation that tower failures, when they do occur, are confined to within 40 percent of the height of the tower. On July 12 the staff presented these revisions to representatives of the amateur radio operators (see attached listing). Minor revisions to wording were discussed, and amateur radio towers were added to the commercial and industrial districts as well. At the conclusion of this meeting, the consensus was that the revisions, which are attached in ordinance form, appeared to be a reasonable compromise between the restrictions previously proposed, and no regulation at all. While some operators may prefer no regulation, unlimited tower heights fail to provide some reasonably protection for adjoining property owners and would be inconsistent with other height limitations in the zoning. ordinance. Unlimited tower heights would also ignore concerns recently raised by the management of the Roanoke Regional Airport over the proliferation of any towers. In researching how other communities approach this issue there is no uniform approach throughout Virginia jurisdictions. Some communities exempt radio towers, while others apply the typical height restrictions for any structure. Very few communities have provisions specifically tailored to the needs of amateur radio operators. In the Roanoke Valley, both Salem and Botetourt exempt radio antennas and towers from zoning regulations. Roanoke City, however, applies the standard height restriction of 35 feet over which a variance must be obtained. The same approach applies in Chesterfield County (45 feet) and the City of Chesapeake (35 feet) . Albemarle County, as another example, allows towers up to 100 feet over which a variance is needed, but also requires a setback from property lines equal to the height of the tower. With the exception of Albemarle, none of the communities contacted had specific provisions for amateur radio towers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1) Approve First Reading and schedule the Second Reading for August 24, 1993. S- I 3 Respectfully submitted, J'nathan Hartley Assistant Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, l ~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs SI ATTENDEES OF JULY 12 MEETING ON AMATEUR RADIO TOWERS David R. Jones Jr. Gordon Garrett 5207 Burnt Quarter Dr. 4528 North Fork Rd. Vinton, VA 24179 Elliston, VA 24087 Lee McDaniel 8506 BelleHaven Rd Roanoke, VA 24019 Danny Pendelton 4763 Jacklin Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Les Myers 2921 Oakcrest Ave. Roanoke, VA 24015 Glen Sage 5426 Stearnes Ave. Roanoke, VA 24014 Peter Vieth 5607 Warwwod Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Jon Hartley Dept. Planning and Zoning s~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONCERNING AMATEUR RADIO TOWERS IN THE VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, after the adoption of said ordinance, it was determined that the Federal Communications Commission had issued certain regulations pursuant to federal law which may constitute a limited preemption of local regulation of amateur radio towers, and which may conflict with certain provisions of the zoning ordinance; and, WHEREAS, these amendments allow amateur radio towers in all districts, require a special use permit to exceed existing height limitations or to locate in residential districts, establish use and design standards, and modify standards for broadcasting towers; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on these amendments on June 1, 1993, and has recommended approval of an ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors considered these amendments at its meeting on June 8, 1993, and referred this matter back to the County's Planning staff to incorporate certain revisions to these amendments based upon extensive citizen comments; and, WHEREAS, the staff revised the proposed amendments based on S-I the comments received to allow towers up to a set height in all districts by right, over which a special use permit would be required, and reduce the required setback from adjoining residences; and, WHEREAS, the staff met with representatives of the amateur radio operators on July 12, 1993 to discuss the proposed changes at which time there was general consensus on the reasonableness of the proposed zoning amendments, as modified; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning amateur radio towers in the various zoning districts of the County; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993, and the second reading was held on August 24, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Section 30-29-7, Miscellaneous Use Types be amended by the addition and modification of the use type descriptions for amateur radio towers and broadcasting towers as follows: ~~~ BROADCASTING TOWER - A structure for the transmission, broadcasting or receiving of radio, television, radar, or microwaves, =a~e~e~e~s, and similar types of devices. ~# .................... .................... .................... ::::::~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~,.be.~::.: s~ : a~at~.l..:;,.. ..................................................................................... ...: P.:::.:~::::::::::::::::~::. 2. That in all Agricultural, Residential, Commercial and Industrial zoning districts, Amateur Radio Tower be added to the list of uses allowed by right, up to the height limitation specified in the Use and Design Standards, by amending the following sections as indicated: SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL~RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Se ction - - 30 32 2 A SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL~RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Section 30 33-2 (A) ~~`'''~`~::~sC~~~~_ane~al~s::>:::~U~se~ SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL~RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-34-2 (A) ?~>;~?I~:sce~~~ne~tus>::>:~)'~es ::......... ....R~t~iCt....T~'~!J~'~'.:::::::. SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Section - - 30 36 2 A SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30 41-2 (A) "~»«»::~?l~sc~~:.~ane~~is:<:>:.Us~~ SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sectio n - - 30 42 2 ........... . y.....>:::.:::...::::.::.::::.::: ~:.::~>••~ SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIST RICT Section 3 0 -4 5-2 A '::::~:::~.:::;:.:;.::.:;.;::>:~~>::::.;::>:.;::»<:>~;::~;.:;:;;::>;:::: ;.;><»::;;;; .::::;:< SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 3 S-I DISTRICT Section 30-46-2 A ~~~~>~~<<~:::....;:.;:.;:.:.;;;;;~;~:>:.;:<.>:;;<:;;;,.:>::;.:;.:,.~;:;:.;»:.:<;.:.;: ( ) ..............:::: ~~s~e.l ~ anec~~s....~se.s SEC 30-47 PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Section 3 0 -4 7 -2 A ~~~~~~~~~~~ `~~~>~~:.:>:.:.;::::;::;:;;>:<.::> :.:.:......:...::.::::.:,:.::.: ( ) ::. ~3~r~eou~....~se.e .::::;;;;:.;: ::..: ~..v...:e~:::::::. SEC 30-51 NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Section 3 0 -51-2 A ~~'<>?:~:.::.:..<.;:<.:,.:::_,.~..:.>>:.:;>:.:::}:::.:::.::<;;:::,.~ .~,::::;:.::;:.;: SEC 30-53 C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT Section 30-53-2 A 5. ta~~~>~ae~~a~>~o>> ( ) SEC 30-54 C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Section 30-54-2 (A) 6. `~~?>>'! SEC 30-61 I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Section 30-61-2 A 6. ~'~~T~~cr~>>~~>> ( ) SEC 30-62 I-2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Section 30-62-2 A 6. ~'<>€~k ( ) 3. That Section 30-87, Miscellaneous Uses be amended by the addition of Use and Design standards for Amateur Radio Towers as follows: :~~~~~~ ': v~ •: ••••::•::::::•~:::i:iiivvvv4iiiiiiiiii''ii i:iiiiiviiiiiiiiiiiiii ::::Y"::4 ~;{::{::{:}i;{i'' iiiiiiii:titi^i:^ii}i}i}i}i}i':•iiii:<: •:i:: ~ i^i i}i:: v}ii}ii: }ii:v'ti:v'tiff^i:^i}iiii:' X ~ "iiiiiiiiii:ti f: tiii}i}i}}}}}}i'.: ~: :y:::::::. :::.:::.:::::::::::::::::::<.;::.;~teur.;;;:.;::~a:a~::~a;:.;:.;:.;'~c~w~x:.::::: ~h~t11 k~~ cc~~~~:~:er~d...... a~.:..: azx :..:;:~:;;;:.;;:.;:.;:<~z~ s~~u~~ur~ ~.~~. sha,~.~ ~~mp~;.,.;;~r.~.~~h....~he ~n.3€.r.~.~zata.~a ::QQ ~~}} ~y ~i:iii:iii4 i;{{{.i:'}:'iii: "n"n}}};'.iiiii:i: :ii?ii:i:'}:'ii #R:W:{: '` ~'~~~.i+yy...•/'~~~1'.~}}, {.:r:.4~;~:y::::.?:i':.i?~:':?iyi i"~iy:::{'iyi~::;:•i~''i~:i::i`....isi.•'~'..~(~~•'~~::~'~'.~.,.j~~~,'~ ~.j:j~iy::;;;;~.~~{ri!.yid:::::Q::::iititi:i'.:}y..ij!~'!~.~. ..3~:~':::;{.:~::.il~:~:,;,:~ /i~:.:. :.:.: :iii::: ? ~.~.::::;:~'. ::. i..... .:::iy.~}} :;.~..i.~.aµy::::::::: .....::FM3ii:L!!.ik :ii'~~ir~.{a WALT~r~;~~ ~M~ ~e~sr' rl'i'Gli ~i ~rie~~M'~'YG F.f~i~.,~;,;1..~,r~~.,:i:::~~,f~i„~;I..;~.rM,. k:•A:: .`TM~::~:Y: +:i:::::?:::::i'::.. }~:''.:i~::i:::i:v :j::::i ~~~:i?i}~!.~~ ~ ::'r'_':`:i•}~::::i: ~ • .~~ `i <~:~...........:+??:, ?:.:~{~} ti.:y~~~i:::::i::~ii:i:~ ~ ~:ii'f.::Y:}»):i:ljji::.:.:::j:ttt:Y• ~~~iiijjjjj:<!{;:j: ~ +~y~ {{.~~ ;{;{~~yy ,}~.. y+~ y; a~ (~jr~ ~,yi:C:i::i::::;'~:i:jj:iiiii(~:y:::ii iii:;i:j"•::•:::•:•::: ::•"iii.~iy~' :::::::: ii>i:: iiiii~~~::::.i{A...;,1;A;,, ~M1R14.:::: ~ tir~.C~„ 4~!~::::v~.,.~r.,.yy~~.4f~:~J.>~IC~W. v~v4~.::::: ~+~.'~~~I:w::~~.l.~r. i::::i i ~4~~i7.G:::ii:~.~i:•:::::~~~ri~. ........ ......:iF..:....:: n:: ~:. ~ ::. .::::::::: :::v::.: ~. ~:::::::::::. ~:::::: :y::::.: ~:::::::::::::.: ~:::::. ;..................... ' i^ii//i~~ii~ji~ii{{ii©©i:nyyn~~•:•' •Y~/:~/Y:~!M!~{i~':i .::::::i::::::::::::<: •:•::: ~iiiiiii ::::•: :: :.ii :::!~:.i iii:iii:' i:'i(ititii::i':i:: . ::iii 'vi:ti:i•.•:i::ii::i::i'::i:i....iiv: "v iii ~: '~'.. :::i:i::. .; :. ~ :;" ::.:. :. :.: :: :.:' ~': }:::: :.i~~?~:.i:.:<~e~;~.~n~:~.~.: ii:?isviv:.iiiii:4iiiiiii:iiiii}yiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ........ ..........:... ....: ...... iiii::......::: :•:•:•:: :: :::: .; :.' .:..: ::, '. :. .i, iiii.: :.: ::::• ::::~~~u~t.~.~:~.i:.ir~n.;> iiiiiiiiiii: ::. ;... v: :::•'. ii i:~z~:.i ivvi}ii»i:' iiiiii' iiiiii"{vi:^iii:hii':4iiiii:}•. ::; ...:. .. .::..:.~: ...: .:...:....::::. ::... :. i::! .: ::.; :: .: :.. :: :: ::: :!;:iii ::: :.: ':: i;~~:: ;~:a..~.~.:~:...i;..il.vt ~~~. ~~ ~t ~eeet....~'qua~. t~...4~ ~~~~en~ c~~ the ~ate~gkx~.:::::;~: >i>iii:.i:.i:.i:.;iii::<.;t~e~-{ ~n~:aee~ ~~~zn ~h~ ~ivseet s~;~~~~~~;:;:~a~~;:;,~, :::::::::: ~:::x::::<::::::::::::>::::isi:.;:.ii:.i:.i:.>:.>::::;.;~:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:~~.ii:.i:.i:.i:.;:.;:;.;::::.:.i:.ii:.>:.i:.i:.;~~.i::::.ii:.iii:.;:.;:.:.:.;i:.i:.;;~~.>:.;i:.i~~;;: ,i:;;.:.::.:.i:.i::.: ..:::.::::.::.::.i...::::.:.:.~::.;~::.;:.;:.i.:.;:.;:::,:.:::::.:..:.....::.i:.i::.::.: ~.i:.i:.i.:.:...:..:.,..;.:i:::i:.;:.i:.i:.i:;.:.::.,:. i:.i:.i:.::;.....:...:..:.i:.iii....::....:.i::.i::;.;..:..:.. tea,a::«<:t~~er:<»<::<:~~e:~t~.::... .i:.i:.i....:»:<:>::: ~:: ::::::::::::::::............................................c~.,~.zx...::::::.....:::.~. :a.~~~:>>::::«::::««<:<:~~a: ;»:«::~one:~s::>::>::s~;e~::~:::>::>:~e ......... ~~::::::::~ ::.::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::g:::::.~......~:.::..:.......:::::::::::~.::::::::.:::~:::::::..~.:::::::::::.::~:::::::::::::.::::.:::.::::~::::::::::.::::. >;:::::i:.:;:<:::ii:><i<::.::;;;..;::..>::i:;:i::i::;::>,: ,::;~i::;:.;;.<:ii:.>:.~:::i:.:i ~::;::;:<.::i:.;:>::i::»>.>:::;::>~:.:: ~:<:><.>:i:;:: ~< .:::::::::.:.:.::<:.:<:«:.i::i>:::~::::.:::.::::;:>.><::<:.:::::.:::>: ~~>::>:::>::::::x:i:.i:.iiii:.;i::.;.,..;:;;;;.:.i:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:~.. ..::::::: ~ ::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:...........:.::::::::::::::::. ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.:.....::...:... ~~:::: c~ ><:::<:<::::::::<::::::i:<::i<ii::i:::i:<:::: ~~>::::<:::>...:;.:;«««<; :ii:<:iii::i::i:iiii::<::;:.:ii<iii::ii:::i,:<:.:isi;::;.iiiiiiiii:.;:.;:.;:.:~:.i:.:.i:.;:;.::i:.:...i...:.:.ii:~.iiii:.ii.:i:.i:.i,i:.iii:;.:;~~.iiiii;~ :;iiii:.i:: ,i:.iii;~~.:.;~~.:.: 4 S- ~:::i::::: ,~~ F ~~~ ~~~ M~~r~jv Se-~~F$': .i: fir ~,{: ~rA{iSrAiS 4 ~' ~+wr~1.~ ~~{~r ~J. Q~~ ~~~i ~..: +~~~': ~::::::::::',.,,::::;;i:~:;::«t:{:%~ ~ ~:::. `~:::;::;;::: :::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::;::k:: •:.::+.::;i;:i::::::;:::::::i::i::' :;:::i•::: `:::: ':::::::::i: ':::::::Y:::::::::::::::;:::;:::i•:::::::::::i:::::; •.;::•>:.::~ ~.:.::.>:.>s:<.s:.:.:.:.:.::.::.>;:':•ii• •.:.:.:.::: ••;:•::•iiiiii• :::: •.;: ::::~.;:.;::.;:.;:.;::Q~:.::.;:<~:~:.:::::~~ze:.;:.i:;~~a~~~.;:;;::~la~~~:~.:.:::<.:~~.:;.;:.;::~:a~.t:~r~:.:;.;;: .::.:... ;.:::.: : ~: ~. :::::.~ ::::::::::::::.::;:;::................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:.~::::.::::::::.................::.::.::::::::::::::::.::::::::p:::::::::::::::..................... ~Q~~.~~.~.~::: a~.~:. ~<~::»::::>::::>:<::r~:~~<:»>~ ~ ~:> ::::::::: ::.::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::.:.~~.~..~..::.~~a::::~:~~m~:~~..:::~,.~:.:::::~..~:r~:::::::b::.::>::::::.:.: ::>::>:::::. ..:::: ~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::::............:..:::::::::::::::::::::::.~.~:::.~::::::::::::.............::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::..................:.:::::~~:.::: ed:~~,~.. .....................................................:.............. .. :.. .; •_ .:: 3' .: '•i: ii}}}}}}}i .: .....:~:.: '+: y::": .:..:: :•:. .:.} 'i 'v.-::: ^. ifiii}ii:iv:: •: v. '.:.. ^iiii:ti^i}iii":vtv:i }ii}iiiii:Ji":•: Ji??iiiiii?ii}iii""iiiiY iiiiiiiii'•i: is :.:::::::::::::::::::::.:~::::::::::::::::::.:.;..::_:::.~::::::.::::::.::::::::::.~::::::::::::.~.::::::::..:.:..::::~u~:.::n:c~.:: ~:.:~.: ~i:~~.x~..:::s~xa.~..~::.b ................................................ i.::: :.:.: ~::.y.:. ~ : ? :.: :..:: ...... '.fJi Ni: .:iii.'...:... ~~........: ..: ::Y::...:...:...:i;ii: ...~ _..~~~~~~~~:::.::Ri. .~:. ~..:::.y~:.. ii? w,:..•. ~::::::::} ~:}.i;:: ~{~j~~ Vii.:::>::i::i:::;:::;i .; .:..::<:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::.;:.>::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::~.:s.::~~:~.~:::a~ :~...::::w:~::~h.:.:a.ri:.::::actd.~.~.~..az~a~.. :'j:r~: }. }:. ., ~..!~..... '~{ .iii:{~.~y.:QQ....i~ ~:. ":: Ti. ~:r~ii:,1{n•: ~~iy~' ::ii::'37~i~.`...::::'}~^.. :•.}'::.; ,; {:: ,+.:::•:::.}. •.~ •: •. ::iii :. ;: •::y:.,: {:.:....:.}}•.::{..::::•,+iY;i iii;:::. ••i'•i'~I::;iiiY'^: i1i}~.. '.... ~:~.,M,.#\~;~S:S~iii:w~1;1l::~~~:~~I~ii~M.~i:::?NI~::?:i?IY.~:r,:ij~(1~..} r. ~n: ~. ~ :.::'}j.^~.:::: :. :~} .: :.:. .: .:. ::::::~y{+y);i'~'':p.:. ~::{r:}'. •::/:1: v: :::::.~ ::::::: :w ::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::}{:.:~:::::.~:.~::::.::::~::.:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::"^~...i ~~M:: .,~f.,~~.tj.~:'::: M,i~Y.M~!~IZI.,~.?I~~ ••••••.....••••••••• ...................................:.::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~::::: :.::::::::::::: :.:::::::::::::: iiiii:;; Ai;,i}iiiiii:vi}:<•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:~•:4iiiiii:Siiiii}i: iiiiiiiii::(i:;:;:y ~~:.~_~:::.:.i..,...~c«©<y::ii}7}_,^t;~:.,'..~:ic««::i::ii. ~~.•.l:.~~~:+ii:...~:`..,,,,....:i::::}::".'.::.,~:~:~..~.:_h;:i.:::.:::.::::;p:4:~:::i::::ii:~':yiii}i~:::::}>::ii::yi'.:::i«:;~::::{:~::y:;+::iiii:~::'~'[f:~:,~:f:~;:::;::; ~'•::~i`~~[f:~;;:c«{<~ ::::::::::::::?,f.A~r'i-;::;~:':::::::::. v.~ij::::::::i: ~~ 1Y tiY\Yf'11~~~ ~:,M,.,::i:~:~ ~~~ ~~M^ ~~4M.{. ,.~,.,M~,^,A;,{; ;Y!!~ ~~f{~~;rM.}/;~i1Y~~{..{~~ 1-) ~~~Q.i .: .......: ......... .......................:.............................:.::.. :..::::::::. ~:::::::. ~. ~. ~:n:~::: :::w:::.::: ~::::: :.:::::::::.:~:::::i}iiiiiiiiiiii:~iiii:LLiiiiiiii iiii}:~iiiiw: i:>~:;:.:.:•.;::>::i::i::i:::.:i:::::<:::i::::i: •:::: ~•:i::i::r•~:ii::s•:•:i:::<:::i::ii:i:;: •,i::.:.i:.i;:.>:.:::.::: •.;:.ii:.i::;<•::•i:•i:.;~ ~.i:.i:.i::;•i:•i:•:~ ::.: ~.is.i:.; :::::::::.:::::::::::::::. ~ :..::::::::::. ~ .::.::.:::.::::::. ~ ..................................................... ~::.i i..i:.;;:.i:.i:.: ;•...i:.:; ,.::.:.::::: :::.:..:...:..:..;..:.;:.;:...:......:,.:...:...:::.:.:::..:.;.::::.i;.:..:;:::.i:.:.:....::::::::::...:. •::::::::.;.:.,.i•.:,•>:;.;:.iii:.ii:.:::.::;::;•i:..;ii:.i:.:.:.;i:•.: •:. ::.::~>.~iii::ii<:~ ~~i:.: :> :i::i i :~:::::~::.:.~::::>:;:.;:.;:.i :::::::::.::::::::~`::::::::.:::~::::::::::::::::;~:_.::::.:.v...x~.~.n:..~::d:~.~:~r~~:~s.i:.;the.:::~r~~..~,.c~~va.t~...:::ad.~l:~.~.a::on .. . ::: ~:xxc~a~c~s..,.i~ha,~.:~:i:..:aL?~.:, ~~ :::::::::::...................................:::::P:::::::::::::.:::::.................~.............:..::.:~.:~.::.~ ::..~:::::::::::::...................................:::~~:~.~..xa,~nc~......~h~ ............................................................ ;~titi# ::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::::::.............:::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:::::::::::::...............::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.~.~:::::::::::::::.~:..........:.:~~~~.~::::~~~.~..~..:::b .. 4. That Section 30-87-2, Broadcasting Tower, be amended by the addition of Use and Design Standards for Broadcasting Towers as follows: (A) General standards: 7 r 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\amateucord g ~- . ...++ , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 .-- t RESOLUTION 72793-10 REQUESTING THE CIRCIIIT COURT OF ROANORE COUNTY TO ENTER AN ORDER TO HOLD A REFERENDIIM ON THE QUESTION OF CHANGING THE METHOD OF SELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AS PROVIDED IN § 22.1-42 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, determines that it is desirable to hold a referendum on the question of the method of appointment of members of the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, as provided by § 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on the question of such referendum on July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on July 18 and July 25, 1993. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board does respectfully request the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order requiring the regular election officials on the day fixed in such order to open the polls and take the sense of the qualified voters of Roanoke County on the question of changing the method of appointment of members of the County School Board of Roanoke County from the School Board Selection Commission to the Board of Supervisors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to certify a copy of this resolution and to present it to the Judge of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, and to 1 r file a certified copy of this resolution with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Judge G. O. Clemens, Roanoke County Circuit Court Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Roanoke County Circuit Court Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Roanoke County Circuit Court Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Elizabeth Leah, Registrar I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 72793-10 requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order to hold a referendum on the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a four to one vote on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER AN ORDER TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE QUESTION OF CHANGING THE METHOD OF SELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AS PROVIDED IN § 22.01-42 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This is a public hearing on the adoption of a Resolution requesting a referendum be held on changing the method of selection of members of the school board from appointment by the school board selection commission to appointment by the governing body of the County. BACKGROUND' At the July 13, 1993, meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the County Attorney was directed to prepare a report and appropriate resolution to place on the November ballot a referendum on changing the method of appointment of members of the school board. The Board also directed the County Attorney to make inquiry of the State Board of Elections concerning possible alternative ballot questions. It is the opinion of staff counsel at this agency that the suggested course of action (alternative ballot questions) is not authorized by State Code. Further, such an alternative would be contrary to State Code. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 22.1-42 of the State Code provides as follows: - that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County may cause to be passed a resolution requesting that a referendum on changing the method of selection of members of the school board be held; 1 7-1 - that prior to the passage of such resolution the Board shall hold a public hearing on the question of such referendum; - that the resolution shall be filed with the circuit court; and - that the ballot question shall read as follows: "Shall the present method of selecting the members of the county school board be changed from appointment by the School Board Selection Commission to appointment by the governing body of the county?". This public hearing has been advertised in the newspaper once a week for two successive weeks prior to this meeting. Section 12.02 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that the members of the county school board shall be appointed by the school board selection commission. Assuming this ballot question passes, or another ballot question concerning the method for appointment of school board members, then this charter provision should be amended by the General Assembly. Section 15.1-835 of the State Code describes the procedure to be followed for a charter amendment (advertisement of the text or an informative summary of the proposed charter amendment, notice of a public hearing, and introduction of a bill amending the charter before the General Assembly). This procedure can be followed if or when the results of these ballot questions so require. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board hold the public hearing as advertised; and upon the conclusion of the public hearing, favorably consider the adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, ., ~, ~ ~ ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by c:\wp5]\agenda\generel\schoolbd.tpt Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 r- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER AN ORDER TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE QUESTION OF CHANGING THE METHOD OF SELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AS PROVIDED IN § 22.1-42 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, determines that it is desirable to hold a referendum on the question of the method of appointment of members of the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, as provided by § 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on the question of such referendum on July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on July 18 and July 25, 1993. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board does respectfully request the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order requiring the regular election officials on the day fixed in such order to open the polls and take the sense of the qualified voters of Roanoke County on the question of changing the method of appointment of members of the County School Board of Roanoke County from the School Board Selection Commission to the Board of Supervisors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to certify a copy of this resolution and to present it to the Judge of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, and to 1 7- ~ file a certified copy of this resolution with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. c:\wp51\agenda\general\school.bd 2 1U 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _ _ _ _ -~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ - ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~-" - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ - - ~i" PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~,,~, CITIZENS COMMENTS - - _ - SUBJECT: D~~,~~e;~~r~ ~>,°j~ ~,_~~" -_ _ - - -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c _ - = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: _ - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oigthe Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - _ - ~ ~- - = NAME `~ - ~ - - - - - - ._ ~- - = ADDRESS ~?? ! ~..,~~ ~~ ~' .,- 1 ~ ,,~ - - ~ E f t. J ~ f- t~ ~ r,, f, - - - - -_ - - - J = PHONE "-i'~ .. , - ~ - ~ M_ ~ ~ ~ - - - mllilllilllllllllllllllillllllilllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllilillllllllllillillllllillillllilllililllllllllllllllllliilllllllll~ 1~tllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllililllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilli11111111111111111111111111111111111,1) ~~~~ _ _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~-~~ - -r-- - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COn~Il1~NTS c - -_ - -_ c ~ ~~ _ = SUBJECT: ~0 ~S - - ~~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c - - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. . _, ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - vnth the clerk. - __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - NAME ~ ~5~ ~FiE'.~' /~ L - - - - _ - -_ ~~~ -_ - - - - ADDRESS ~C% ~~ ~ ~~~ o%~ ~~C ~ - _ - - z /~s - _ - _ - _ - - _ - - - PHONE ~V ~ ' ~a ~ -- ~a 7 ~ mllllliillllllllilllillllllllllllllll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 ~iiiuir~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiii~iiiiiiitiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _. _ 3 _~ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ' ~ c =_ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ ~~UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ __ SUB CT. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to c c p g , omment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c c - - - _ fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~iiiuihiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiii~i~i~ ~: _ _ - - ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - , - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ !~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~' CITIZENS COMMENTS c =' , ~. ~ ,,, SUBJECT: _ ~' ~~~.~_ ter' ~ ~ 1,~ ~:~,,~- c- ~- ~~ ~_, ~ ~- - ~ ,~ r .. __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker -and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 1~IIIIIIIilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllll~jj~ 5\ - (.._./ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ -~/ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - _ - - APPE CE REQUEST - ~~ - - - - '-' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ITIZENS COMMENT -' - S - - - - - - - - - = SUB CT: - = JE ~ 1 ~~ i ,~_~~~~~ _ - -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ~- - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to = do otherwise. _ _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - _ - =_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - NAME ~-~/ `~ - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ - - - - ADDRESS ~ ~ cf (~r l' f/ ~P ~c. ~~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - PHONE ~ ~~.~ :-~ ~ ~~ millllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllliilllilllllllllllilllillllllilillllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilillllllllilllll~ ~IIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,W ~~, _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ - - = - - -_ - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~~~ITIZENS COMIVIENTS - _ - - SUBJECT: ~i c' ~ ~~C:- (' - ~c?~iG~ t~ ~. - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c c - = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c - - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - _ - = - - = - - - - - - -_ - ~, ~-~ - - - - NAME ~' / +-( C~ /L ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - -, ADDRESS /~'~`r1 t~,f~ ~~,-,,,~? ~ ~-~ ~_ .~ c~~~'~~ - - - ~~ - - ~.~ ~.. - - - % ~-~ ~ - = PHONE ,..~ ~~ ~Z. r - _ - mllllllllllllllllllllllilllliillllllllllillilillllllillillllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllll~ 1~IIIIII~IIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllillllllillllllll111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. L -- - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _, - - - - - - - - = SUBJECT: S G r-~(`~ C - L ~~~ ~~~ - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ - = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - _ BELOW: - - _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ _ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ ^ Both speakers end the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. _ -_ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - _ - _ - - - - _ - - mlillllllllllillillllllllllllllllllilillil Ililllliillllilllllllll Ililllllll IIIIIIillillillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllil l IIIII~ ~ ... AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-11 APPROVING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE FUNDING OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SI%- YEAR CONSTRIICTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 27, 1993, to receive comments on the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94; and WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94 as set out on the attached construction program allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94 by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: i Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 1 1 J v rn ° 8 0 O N O ~ r~ ... I M e-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ E~E H C O a ~ ~ M ~ O O ~ ~oo O ~ G 71 O Q D ~ o I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I i 1 ro i ~ i ~ I I I J-1 I I I I I ~ I I I I U 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I U7 I \ U] I I I N I 1 N 1 I Ul I 1 1 I I Ql I N I CJ I N I N I 1 I C I I I U I ld I U Sa I U I 1 In 1 U I la I U 1 >+ 1 I I I I O 1 O 1 O I O I O 1 I 1 I Lv 1 Cz~ 1 CL I W 1 Cz1 1 I I I I 1 1.1 I +1 I 1-J I ~.1 1 ~ 1 I I I I I I I i I 1 I I I I I _______ j 1 ____ 1 O I _____. 'V' 1 ______ I 1 O I ______ I O I _____ 1 O I _______.____ O N I 1 O I O\ I O I O I th 1 ch ~ ~ j ~ j ~ j ~ ~ ~ I I I H I O I N 1 O I O I I I H I ~ I cr I N I N 1 I ~ ~ ~ I I 1 ~ I 1 I I x 1 I 1 I 1 ---- 1 - I 1 1 1 I --"- 1 I 1 '''-- I I I 1 1 ---'-- 1 I 1 I I 1 1 ''''-- 1 I i 1 1 '---- 1 1 i ___'-''--- i I I I I 1 I I I I • I I 1 I I 1 1 I I c 1 I I 1 I I I I •rl I I I I I I I 1a I I c I I C 1 1 1 0 I U 1 • i i i O ~ i v ~ i i ~ i ~ ~ i z i i i C a ~ i i c ~ i i •O i c I D I N I i O . 1 I G I ro I I W I I •r•I I --1 I ro I .-~1 I I N I c 1 ~ 1 N 1 1 a I I (A 1 o I ro 1 1r 1 c 1 I 1 I r1 I --1 I 4L i O 1 C I 1 'O I ~ I H 1 I •.•1 I O I 1 c 1 .~ 1 ro I 'O I J-1 1 •'1 I I ro 1 b I t~ I G I ro I U! I 1 I '0 I N I ro 1 N I •'•I I I U I iQ I C I I •'•I I 7 1 1 •rl I I H I '>t I .••~ I rl ~ I I W I ro 1 ~ 1 I 1J I I I 7roi 1 ~ I •^I I ~ I Ql 1 ~ I I I 1 F i x I I i a I I i ~ I I i ~" I 1 1 I I I I I `~ l I I i l I I I i l I I I i l I I 1 i l I I I 1 1---- 1 '--'-- 1'---- - 1'--'-- 1 ''-'-- 1'---- 1 "'--''''-• p I I I I I I I 1 F£ I H 1 t'n 1 V' I ~f'1 I tD 1 r I CJW 1 o I o 1 o I o 1 o I o 1 ~H I ~ I ~ 1 t0 1 ~ I ~ 1 ~ ' 1 ~-7 H I 1[') I ~ 1 t1') I If'1 I 1a7 I tc ) a I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I W I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I [ + i ~"'f I O I tt'f 1 N I V' 1 IA 1 "J I O 1 O I O 1 H I .--I i ~--1 I O I O I O I O I O I O 1 O I ~i 1 1 I j j O I O I I 1 O I I 1 O ~ I 1 ~ I I I O 1 1 V' .--1 t+1 N zh F c~.a ii~ I H o 1 i ~j E• Ta rn G1 7/ H .-~ O O Hn W ^U O N q tp h M C1 L~ H ~ v ~ C h ~ ~ ~ Q m C7 d ~ ~ ~ O F o H O Cu ~ ~ D i 1 l a I I I I i I I i I ~ ~ I 1 I I x i x i x i x i x i x I I I I N I £ I H 1 ~ I I ~ I H ~ I H I I ~ I H ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I FF ~ 1 I I ~ I ~ I 1 i ~ I I I 11 1 I 1 ---- I - G I ----------- I LL I ----------- 1 W I ---------- I - a ----------- 1 GL 1 1 ------------ I G4 ----------- I I - I I I I i I I O I I r'1 I I O I u'1 1 I 1 r'f I O I I 1 I '-I 1 I O I ch 1 to I ~ i m I O I I N ~ ~ 1 ~ I O i M i N ~ ~ I I I I H I ~D I tD I ~D I Ol I N 1 r I I I l r I F 1 1~ I i!T I 1 VT I I VT I i N ~ I .--I I I ~ I '-I ~ i l r I I I I I a I 1 I ---- 1 - I I I I I I I I I I ----------- I I 1 I I I 1 ---"'------ I 1 I I I I i ----------- I i I I I ----------- I I I I I ------------ I I I I I I I 1 I ---------- I i I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I i t I I I I I I I I I i I 11 E I H I I I I tQ Q~ I 1 I I I Haa I I I '•.] I a I ~ 1 I (; U I I I ~ I Q Z LAW 1 I ~ Ha 1 I U I U I I C/7 I ~O I Z~ 1 W~ I I C7 Z I ~ I I Y I ,'~ fn 1 I O 1 I I W I D I M I q I QQQ I I Cn O I . H I U I Z I I I I I rl I ~ N I Q: ~1 I I H N I G] I I a ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ii~ i i a ~ i t I I I I I I I 3 I ~ 1 H i 3M I 1 M 1 ~ t7') I rM I Nv I I I i ME I d' I bC' 1 X00 I C'am' 1 MQ~ I I E-+ I 1 q I .--IO I r~CD I MK. I 4^. CO I ©W 11 Z I I .-11C') I I .--I.--1 I I q.-i I I .~ a I .-I .--1 I 1 I Hri L ] I I 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 I N ~+ I F F I E-+ E-. I F U I F I F~+ I I H ~o ~ as i aCG ~ acn i a ~ a•» i i 2 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I H .... c:. F ~ .... ~. F ~ .... C:. F ~ .... ~+F .... ~ ~. F i .... ~. F ~ I i I to I N I .-1 1 d' I .--I 1 O 1 1 I ~+ 1 N I .--I I o ~ I O ~ O I rh I o ~ O I I a i O i i i i i ~ ~7 I I I 1 I I 1 ---- I ----------- 1 I ---------- I ---- I ------- 1 ------------ I I ------------ I -------- -- I I I I I Q 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E-~ ~ I .-i 1 1 N I O I r'1 I O I ~' O I to I 1 O I ~D O 1 I 1 I I LJ 1 I W F I O M I c'7 I M 1 c+7 I M I M I I I ~'7 H 1 11'] I ~I1 I t1'f I ~ I tt') I ti 1 11 1 a I I CL I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---- I I I I ------------ I I 1 '----------- I I I ------------ I 1 ------------ I I 1 ----------- I I I i i ---------- C I I -- I I 1 1 I 1 ^ I I i a O I I I I ~ i ~ i i i ~ Q i c ~ o ~ I r1~ I V~ I V'~ 1 ( ~ tOZ yy ~ i ~C I Mw 11 I { I I I 1 O I .i I N?I I e~-i W 1 071 I .-1 1 MH .-1 `.L I MW I i Q 7 1 q .--1 W 11 1 1 F G7.,~, I i [~ ~ i F ga i F W i t I I ~Z I as 1 ~ 1 G:m I C2: I am 11 -------- ------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------- -- ~~ .~ 71 H O M O ~ L•] CI 'J" O N h o ~ 1 M H ~ E ~ ro N C ~ O r Cl Z C O H C7 !-I O o `" ~ p~ O ~ O a o D ~ ~ ~~ I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I ~~ 1 1 I I ~a i I I I I I I I I ~---- 1 I I I H IF 1 I 1 i I I 1 I i ____ I 1 I I ~E I I C] I I iY] I I ~ I I ~ I I p I I ~Hrr ~p I I NU ii~ 3 I I k+ I 1 I I a 1Hf1~ 1 I c-~ qW ~a iiZ I I H LF I o II 1 N I I I 1 I I o I I ,..7 1 I I i¢ I I 1 ii ii •------------- I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I r-1 I I [-~ I M I I ~ I <t'1 I I ~ 111 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 i I I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I ' I i I I I I I I ~ I ~ ---- ~ 1 I ------''''-- I °---------- I --------------- °-------- ~ --- -- I ---------- l ~ i p o i i Q I O I 1 4'. I I I 1n N 00 ~ I 01 1 I d' CY. 1 I ©O I I i H O 111 c0 ~ I O I CO I M~ i c>, 1 I I i M[~ I C I cD ?I I ^+ I U x i x 1 I 1 ____CL 1 G. ~ I ~ ~ I H M i ~.+ O 1 Q i ~ II I I I ____________ i ~ I 1 I _____-_ -r, a ______________________________ I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I i i I ~~ I 1 I 1 I I I I i x i x i x I I E i ~ I HH I ~ I I EE I Z I Ry 1 I ~ I I I 1 1 I I a -------------- i o --------------- i s ------------ ~~ -- I 1 O I I O I I ~ I I I I CA I tD I O I lD I I M j ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1~ i r I I M I 1A I I M I V? I ~-i I (!} I I M I I U? I I I r-i I I I I 1 1 I I N 1 1 _____ i 1 I 1 1 I H I ~ 1 I 1 ([ ~y I Iyy-''I I U I ~ I W I C 1 (~"' 1 p I ~p p ° W i rii i ~ i i c a v i x p Z~ O ~ 1 i q tt --~I j 1 1 ~ 1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ j I .--+U' I M I .-Ir I r I 1rr I v0~ I tf1V' i r-1 I O 1 OEM I GJCJ I .-1 I ^ '-I I r-ICD I .--1.--I a~ i ~C i CC i as ~ i I ---- I" .... 1 --'-- °------- .... ----------- , .... ------------- I .... ----'--- I I I I I N I ~ I I ~O 1 I Ql i ~ ' N i M i e--I i N ^ ^ I ((ss~~ 1 I F7 I o I I o I o I 1 0 1 ~ ~7 I I I I I i I I I ~ ---- ~- ~ -!-- --''----- I -"'--' -'-- - ------- I '----- 1 I -------- -I' I I I I I i I H 1 r I Q I ~ I O ~ C s7 ~j I H I l O I I CC I~ ~ I 1 I t1') I 1I1 I I I to I 1 ~~ a~Q~ M S ^ W _ _ O N h b ~D I M rn .-i .--I G C V1 ~] ~ ~ ~ H FFy. Z H LJ pO•I 6H'. E^ O V ~ O N ~~~0/7 r .7 G ~ C _______________________ '' ~~ I !n 1 1____ I I I IF I I I 1 I I ~ ___ O H IU I I ^ I I x I x I i ~ i ~ H2 i ~ 1 a I a I a _____________ I ~ I ~'"_-__ ______ __ 1 __ I I O i I I I O O I ~ ~ I ~ I I to 1 ~ i 1 H I .-d I ~ ~ I I I I' I j ~ I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 T_a M 7 I I _~______I____. 1 O I O I O I 1 N 1 I I I I I I 1 1 ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~~ ~~ M I H I I ~ j ~ Nc, I I ~ I -- 1 I ~ 1 I O I I I I N .-1 1 O I I to tD i ~ ~ ~ N r I r I I Q1 N I N I I M ~ ~ i I I +h I ________-_____i ____________ i ___~__ I I I I I 1 I ~ I I I I ~ I I I I j 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 p I GG 1 I ~ ~ I 1 I I I I I i I I I C~ I I I I N 1 ~N I I CCC I ~ aS ~ ~ I 1 m C I cDm I ~ , ~ . ~. ~ ~ ~ a E + iZU I FF . F i CC ~ I I I I I I •• •• I I CuF------ ~-----~-!H I 1 -°- I -------- ------ I I I 1 I '-1 I t~1 I I I N i N ~I I ^ ^ 1 - i ~.~l ~i ~ la--I I I I 1 I I I O 1 ~~i ~ I LQd 1 I Ls] I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I M .-i M I!•) I-------------- 1 -~------------ I 1 O I ~ I I O~55 I .--1 a I I 1 1 CDU I H I ~ C~a~ [ ~~ I CG G.+ I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ I I I I I I I I O i I I 1 H I 1 I I ~J ~~ j I 1 0 O O I ~~ I I I qy 1 tDV 1 I I rr H I I 1 ZO I I E" ~C CL Cj i 33 ~ ~ ~ ~ HH 1 £ £ E~ I I F I I i I Z ~ o~ao ~ I ; i V'ln Orl C ~ ~ I I H 0 0 i 00 ~ ~ I I Z ~ .... .. j .. I F I ~ ~ ~ ----(y G-i 1 CuF ' 1 I O I O ~ i ~ o ~ I I o I I 1 I I 1 v I ~ ~ i !h ~ I II I I I I i ~ I I I I ~ I ~ ~ j I H I 1 ~~ ~'~ O ZZZ I M I ~ H I Cy E~roQ I ~i0 I 1 I ~ I I '-I I I c'1 I I ~ I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 ___ ~_ I 1 I I I I I j I 1 C I I l0 ~•I I I ~~ 1 I ~ 1 r O 7= a ~~ o~~ "'80 O N ''7 q l0 I ... M ~ ' tT '-1 e-1 X h d a Cc7 O F G1 Z ~ ~HH U ~ Z O o !F"c ~ ~ o `" c o ~ ~ ~ p u~i O __________ ~ ______________________ ~ __________________ I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ I 1 ~ o x i I I 1 I I I I (~ $ i I I ~ I I M I ~ I I I_ 1 I O I I N I 1 O I I I~ 1 Z I O I 1 I N I I 1 ~ I I~ H 1 I I~ + I [ N I I 1 I I 1 I I V? I I ~ I N I 1 I ~ 1 I I I 1 I I ~ I I 1 I ~ ~~~.++1 1 I CL I 1 H 1 I C I I ~ I 1 ~ I --- I I I ~~ ~, I I ~ --- I I UI I ~I is t I I I i I I I I I I N I N I 1 1 I I H a ------------------- I I I I I I i I I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I 0 1 _°- I ______-----'-- I I ~ I ~ 1 i I , tOCO 1 I 1 LA ~~ I I 1 1 I F'~ 1 I I I -------------------- i i I 1 1 I E 1 I 1 ~ I --'-' 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I ~ 1 1 I I I I v rn O (~1 O H U ~ O N M C1 .--I -i ~ E ~ C rQp1 C ro Or Q H oC. O ~~~~ o ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 8 ~ o cn o __. I 1 ~ IF 1 I I I I I 1 I ~ H ~ Cz7 ~ ~ ~ = ~ 1 H y I I ~ I ?~ Q O6 ~ I Q[~ ;37~ 6 V O i ~F ~] w I I ~ ... w ~ 8w~ ------------ "~wr~ I C --1------------ o O O I to I O I O I In ~ M ~ I O to I C' I~ I I I 1 1 I ~ I I H I I ~ I 1 ~ I H 10 IF is I 1 ~ I I i I ~ d' I I OHO 1 I M I I O ~. I I ~~ I I 1 I H i_ M I I ~] i o 1 I 1 ~~~~ ~~~ I QH off H ~~ IQH ~~ I ~~ ~ I ~ Qi ~ ~3~ . g ~~ oa is ~ , I~Q w ~ I~ w , I C I """" '---- 1 - I -'-"'-''-'--- I I O 1 O 1 I O I O I O I O 1 O to I O to I .--I I ~ I M I ~ i t ~ 1 I W 1 I W I I I 1 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Q I I 1 1 I 1 a I I q 1 I ION I I 'CO I ~~ I U ~ IC 1 C C I C ~ I I 1 ~ 1 I I M I 1 £ I I C.~ 1 1 ch I I o I I I I Lr~.l I Cs] I UC. I I `.L ri I UN cif ~ ~~~ I U I W E• I~a I q ---- 0 O O to H .--1 I 1 a IIa I I C!1 1 I I 1 F I I yQaWU 1 I LL 1 1 ~ I I H I 1 E-~ a 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 a I I G] I I I 1 Z I I 1 ------'-- I I I I I I a I I 1 a ~,~ ~,~ ---- I I -------- ------ ------ 1------------ 1-------- I I 1 I .~ I H I '-1 I I o I o I o I~ i I I U .--I ~ 1 U 1D ~ E I O I [~ I F O I N I M I I N I N I N I W E+ I I I I I 1 1 I'7 H 1 O I O I O 0 O O ~ 0 ~ I G I I 1 I ch I .--I 1 H 1 I I ____ 1 O _________ I _____ 1 __ I O ______ I O ___. 1 _________ 1 _____ I I 1 I I I L] I I I N I CSI I 1 G: ~--I I N I Z N N QQ 1 I I C~ xt 1 it ~ ~ ~ i0 i O~H ~iM ~ ~ilntl F C C H H I 1 ~ I lO H C I tO C ~ ~ ai ~ a i n .-r r O M N O ea O I to H O M '$, N.I 1 C7 N 1 +W M ~n a 7- a ~O C' CT F U .-i ~?yyI H 0 5 M O H W UU ~ O N ~'; q t:J I M L1 .i .--1 N C 41 C ~:] ~ F ~ZZ C7 5 O oy~~ ~ ° ~ ~ Lu N O a o vwi o _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 I ~ I I ic,^ I Q I 1 1 F i i r i F ~ i ~ ~~ i Qa~ i a~ i t~ yy I I 1 I I I I ~~ 1 L i ZH~ I pzH L=1 I H W 1 I I y I N ~~H 1 Q' ~ t Z H I Z I""I I H 11 I YYx~~ I ~.7 ,+,~ 1 3Z I ~+0 I 7+0 ~ I ~ I I I I Lu I O 1 Q Csa I ~c." Lu 1 C:i 1 I 1 1 O~ 'xyl,'O ~ Qi 01 I 3L O ~y1 3L O ~y1 O I I C 4' O i Ql~ H O'I H I I ~ ~ t-+ I a Ozp ~ o i t7 ~CI-I ~ C7 ~ ~i N C~ aupri ~ 1' O ~ i Ccn~ Wi C~ I F+ p 1 I I ~ a ~i W W ~ ~ ^.~W H e ~ ~ ~ U~7 ~~~q! ~ I 1 1 1 1 ~ W~ W I I 1 ____ I ____________ 1 ____________ I ____________ I ____________ I ____________ 11 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I O 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 11 0 I 1 0 I q I O 1 0 1 0 I I q I Q 1 0 I~ I O I~ 1 0 I I I I H 1 t1] 1 t0 I O 111'1 I tf1 11 t0 IF IN 1.-i Itn IN IN I IO I~ I~ I ~' I~ I~ 1~ 1 I n I I I~ 1 I I i l k 1 I i 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 ____ I ___________ I ____________ 1 ___________ I ____________ I ____________ I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 i I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I `.L I i I I I I i 1 C:~ I 1 I I I I a I I UC 1 I 1 I I I iQ a i i i W ~ i~~ o i i i~ i iii 1 1 I I H I 1 1 I~ I 1 I i m I 11 Cr] I HF I ~ I 1 I C I I I ''j I d~ i 0 i n i I F i I I C IH I IlJ IM IV~Q' I I ILL 1 ^' I L•] I ~O 1 0 I C1 I c I I ICJ I (~ I in Ito 1 0 I IZ I Cq I O I F 1 I ~ I 01 11 0 I W I H I C I W W I W I I I H I D I C I I FZ I ~~rr I F I I [~ I 1 m I 1 ("..H I C I C I I V I i QQ I Z I I-7 1 I I I O I I F 1 I W I W~ I ~ I I I I I HO 1 ~ I HH I C`rr--~~ I I Cn I I q IEN 1~ I~X 10£ 1IZ I I W I N I F I W I C1 I I Q I 1 1 0 / I t1') a 1 0 I 1i 1 1 I U I 1 U I .~ W 1 0 ~Q0-± I N W I W M I I (Czx~~ ~ I ~ 1 O C IOW I O ~Q i C., O I IC.. .... .. .... I I d I I I•• 11 I 1 1 LLL]]] ~ ~~fl ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 1Z 1---- I ______''''-- 1'-'-"---'-- I ""'"-''-- 1 '"""''---- 1'-""''''-- 1 1 I I I I H 1 H I H I I I I I I ~ I ~ I E 1 1 11 I 1 H 1 1 I 1 1 I~ I I I E I O I O I to I I 1 I I I 1 M I N I M 1 1 ~W.7 i 1 i rn i ° i ° i ° 1 1 I O I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I ~__-- I I I 1 I I 1 -'-- I ""-'--- 1 """''''-- 1 "'-'-''--- I ""'--'''-- I ""--''-"- I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I r-1 1 '-i 1 ~ I v I '-1 I I 1 I O I O I O I r I O I I I I t1'1 I to I u'1 I V' I 1(') I I i0 i U i U i v i m i U I I M I Ol I N 1 V' I I~ I I I Er£ I N 1 N 1 q I O 1 M I I ICJ i7 I N i N I N I N 1 N I I 1 ~F I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I H I O I O I O I O I O I I I 1 q I q I q I q I q I I I I O I O I O I O I O I I ILL I 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I W I q I ~J I O 1 M 1 1 I I to I ~ I M 1 1~ I M I I I I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I 1 .-i 1 O ____ I O ____ I O ____ I O I I 1 ____ 1 ____________ I ________ I _______ I ________ I ____________ I I I I I ~ 1 1 I I I I I CI O tnI ~ ~I I I I I I C N I C N I N I I~ I q I I I I Q I I Y I ~ N I N I I I [ W~ I ~~..]] ~k l ~k l W vt l I 11 10 Ig1.a Il0£ I W I iFIM 7t1 I ~+ r l C ?~ i ~ ~+ I M~ ~1 1 I I I ~H t+ 1 lD U F F F I I ~D H I Ir-~ I M H I (~ H I S f!) H I I ~~ p. ~ p~~W a1iOE CI H CII 1 t ~ HI HI ~ ~i a ~i ~ ~ 1 I CI W cGl CI CI CI I I I LLI YI dI C7 dI LLI m W I I ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ~+ r / -~ v rn 0 p ~ O ~ W _ _ O N ~j Q V' I M rn .--I Y a c h ~ y W O ~ZZ 2 ~ O O ~~+ ~ o ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ G Q W W ~ m D ------ I ~ ----------- 1 ~ ~ ----- ~ 1 ------ 1 1 ~ ~ I I 1 a~ 1 ~~ ~ i 1 1 ~~ (7]~ I 1~ I ~j I ~+ H ~` I I Re G ~+ O H ~ i. I ~ I F Qp Z~ ®® C7~ ~ ~C ~~~ I I I I H'-~ H H I C~ ~ I 1 •J H F C I I I ____ ti~ 1 a ~ I 1 _____.__ ~ __ a _____~? I 1 1 I ~ ICO I V' Ir I 1 IO I O ~o I H C.~ I I O IN I t n I N Iri ~ I I I ~ I I ~ I Q i 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 ~ ; ;N 7 1 ~ I O I 1 ~ W ~'~ I 1 I NG~ I Nl0 1 1 I 1 WW ~~ ~ Iy I £ I ~a(~ 1 Z Z q I O I 1 HN I Nt0 1 i ~~ I O E-~ i~ F I-- I I I 1 I I is 1 I 1 i0 I ~~ I ~] M I C la I I 1 1 I M ~ I O~ 1 O ~ I ~ O I O 0 In U m c N I O O I N O -~-'-- ~ ~ I a N r-7 a I O "' E-, I~ I .-1 m a ~ ~ ~ ~ ] Z ~ 2 ~ .] Z I. 1 ~~~ M ~ M ~~ C Z L C ~ • G Z v ~ • ~ ~ I--I ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ H a /~ O ~{ tW°i a ~ w ~ ~ ~ a _______ W_~_ ______ 17.1_ _ __ _____ ________. O ~ O bb i D O N 2 ~~ L•' r+ I NZ ~ j ZL® ~1 ~~~!!!! O ~ 'S'~ .. ~ W-1 Q q N r N N I I 1 1 I 1 I E 1 Q 1 I 1 ©H 1 I O I 1 ~ I 1 I I 1 i I ~ I ~ i n. 1 m 1 I I I W I 1 M ~ r I I M `L ~ I O ~~ I I • W H~ C C ~ Zp 1 1 U 1 ,i [ FEO a • E• I I ZH I M Z H .• 1 1 yy~~ QQ I Q •• ~ 1 Gc. E~ I F iz I ------------- ----------- --------------- ----''---- I ~ I ~ E ~ I E I i I O O O ~p tt') N In I O ; H I H O O ~ 1 I i I I I I ----------- I I ~ voi I U -~ I ea I O I O I O I N I O 1 '---"----- I ~ O I M 1 Q yR N~ ~I I M .-I .-1 .-1 • •-1 I 1 O 0 0 0 1 U U U U r M ri m I ~ t+1 N1 d I N N I N I N I 1 1 I O O O O I O O O O I I I I 1 I C` I •-i M ~ 1 I O O N f+1 ~ ~ ~__- i~_ __. _. ___ ~_ ~_-.. __ ~_._ _. ___~_ ~___ ~__. "_ I I I I N N M I ~t 1 M ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ a' Gj p C p C Q I a '! ~ " ~ u . ~ ~ " CC H I::I ~ ~ C 1 ~ p A C ~p ~ ~ C ~ C I I F ~' O -- --~ ---W G - ---~=- I T a~ c F c~ U rn 0 `~' Pi o ., O N h p ~C I M G1 Q1 .-1 ~ Y Z ~ ~ ~ H ~Cy++ Ham' (J N M GCf~ COrJ ~ ~,GH [v O O ~ a O O r ~p ~ D -------- t 1 ------ -- 1 I I z ~ ~ i Wz i z m i I Y I ~~ ~ 1 ~S~ i 53~ t3 ~ i 1 ~^ I ~ I ~ I I I 1 1 I~ I I 1 C ~Z ~~ ~ I rni >+Z ~~ I i N~ C~ rn ii i H ^~ d~01 H ~ ®~i E ^O ii ~^ `~ Oi • . ] ! ~ Fi~ ~ I a ~ i ~ ~ a ~ ~ l I 1 I I W ~ 1 1 -°-- ~ W i -°-- ------- ~ ___ - I I _ 1 1 I -_'- 1 1 I ------ O ---'- ~ I O ~ I I O O I I CD 1 Z I O I O ~ ~ I I V' t I 1 0 1 1 F I ~ N 1 I ~ N 1 I ~ N V? I I N I I G1 1 I N I ~Q 1 VY I V? i I 1 SCH jj I I ~ I ~ 1 I N I ` - l I Q I I 1 1 _-_ 1 ___-_ ~ I _____- i _____ ~ I _-_-__- i -__-_- ---- I - I I 1 I I ; I i 1 I I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ 11 I I 1 1 I ~Q 1 I 1 I ~ i ~ I C Cc1 x Z 1 1 1 I I 1 ~ 1 I ~ H I I 7ZQ~ I j 1 1 Cr] 1 M 1 I ~ I 1 1 I Fp+~ ~ I H ; V ~ j I I d 1~ I Cr .~ C 1 N 1 © I I Z O I O I UC' j .0..1 ~ ~ I I ( M(B~ I 1 I I L7 I I U Z ~ I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I I E j 1 ~ 1 I 1 ~ O I I 1 1 1 1 ~ I ~ 1 1 11 1 I 1 O 1 i W i O I U 1 1 5 I Cv Cv I ~~, 1 1 ------ 1 ---- ------- I W I' - i i Z --- I I I --- 1-°- - i ~ 1 i 1 ii ~~ ~ i 1 ~ O 1 I ii II i ~ i 1 1 .a i I I I ii 11 n i EC. 1 G OU~i m I W Ew 1 N 1 M 1 O I ~ I OI 1 1 ~ 1 I CA ~--_1_-~ I I ~~ I o~ IO IN~ SOW I ~1 !! F i i F-1 a ----- ----- i ----------- i i .-.i O I t0 1 r 1 ~ I I U i A I l 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ii N 1 N I I I ~, I I m I © ~ O I 1 O I I I I ...1 ~ G7 1 .-1 1 ~ i © I 1 ~ --_--- ___-- 1 _-_-___ --____ I Q Q ' I I I 1 l! 1 Lf1 1 ~~ O F 1~~ t ~ p ~ 1 H 1 ~ C C ^ l O I ~, p ai U wi Ta ------ 1 I ----------------- 1 I I I -------- ------------ I I ----------- I I 1 1 ~ ~ a ~ i W pp Z ~~ I C I pYlO I I I I I r£~ I rH ~ ~ p ~ 1 1 1 C~ 4 I Cr.] V ~ I ~ p I I I ~ ii 4 H I C I i ~UE"r ®~j I t" 11 ZL H I I I I I i ~ ~ !! ~E ~~~-- ! O ~ ! Z~ ,~ 1 I C7 r] 1 I I Z -~ -• I 1 W "" d 1 1 1 C ~ C G N ~ I I - ~~TT i I I I I I ____ I LL 1 I ____________ I _ ______ I ____ 1 _______ I I ~_____ 11 I 1 I i I O i O I i I I I I O ~7' N GJ o V' f'1 I I O I O I 11 0 G~ tf1 N O 1~ G1 I Z I O 1 O 1 11 0 '-I N ~ O O G1 .-J I O I H I I 1 O I O I I I I 11 0 • N !. • N O • M I :--+ I to I .-i I 11 ~D M lf7 Q1 ~D C' ~ ~ I N N N O ,--I y I I I i I I I 1 I I I I N CJ a ~ ~ i i i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D cj .--i I R,' I I I I I ~ c `° c n 1 ---- I I ------------ 1 - I I ------- ---- I ------- I ------- I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I ~ I I 1 i i I i i 1 4 i iw Cn ~ z ~ Q F i0 ~ Q I H I i I I I I'j ~ 6~ () C i H H ~ ~ - 1 I I I 1 1 a I I p ~ 77 C ( ~ U ~ i - 7 Q U I Cn I N I 1 t0 I I I I I Ccl ,t,,,, ,t W , ~ (:] + ~ H r j ' I p I I Q', 1 I I 1~ 11l Ol0 I I 11 I I~ (:] L V ~ Gi. O Z ~ I I CZ 1 ~Dd I I I p ~ : C O I I ~C i I I I Z H ' + p }i 'r C1 I I ~~ ~ Fc. 1 1 1 ~ a 7 G ? H Z ~~-! C ~ I I I Cti1 I N I I C... E-~ I I ~ I I 1 1 C p ~ U . ~ ~ f=W o CJ ~~-+ [[~ ~ Q H p ~~ ( f~ ~ ~~ [ U i y i t-10 i H I I I W Z ~ H p I 1 I I I I I ~-7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i [:. E+ i cL E i i i a c. ~. F . p ~ ~ i ---- i i ------------ - ------- i ---- ~ ------- i i i ------- ~ ~ p E~ ~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I I I ~+ L• I ~ E 1 ~ O Z3Z3Z3 "`C---n777 I ~± 1 CZ7 I <n I 1 N I O ~O I I I I I I i o a o O m 1 ---- i 1 ------------ 1 - I i ------- ---- 1 ------- I ------- I I 1 1 I I I H I t o l r-1 0 1 1 I I I I i i C Z 2 I O I I - 1 I I 1 1 ~ I a1 1 I I ~~ i ~ i ~ i ii 6Hi o i o i ii I C I O 1 O I i t I Ca I I t I 1 I I ~ i ~ ~+ o i o 1 --- - 1 ------------ 1 - ------ ---- I ------- ------- I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 fn r-I 1 p N 1 11 f-~ Z 1 I H `.L ~+ I~ ~ ~+ 1 I I I~ IOQ NIO NI 1 I a ~ 8 ai i ii I T ~ The following road projects in this years's budget by County NUMBERED CONSTF PROJECT PRIORITY # NAME #21 #22 #23 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #32 #52 #53 #54 #54 #55 #55 #1 have been identified for funding staff and VDOT: :UCTION PROJECTS ALLOCATION ESTIMATED AMOUNT ADVEF;TISIIKII~r DATE West River Rd $365,000 01/94 Merriman Rd $400,000 06/94 Starlight Ln $100,000 09/93 Starlight Ln $300,000 09/93 Cresthill Dr $ 25,000 01/95 Yellow MT Rd $416,000 09/95 Glade Creek Rd $ 50,000 08/94 Lost MTN Rd $ 25,000 12/94 Benois Rd $ 25,000 05/95 Bunker Hill Dr $260,748 02/94 Colonial Ave $125,000 10/94 Timberview Rd $ 30,000 08/95 Hollins Rd $ 50,000 06/96 Florist Rd $ 20,000 07/96 Ardmore Dr $ 25,000 07/95 Ardmore Dr $ 25,000 07/95 Clearwater Ave $ 25,000 07/95 Clearwater Ave $ 25,000 07/95 UNPAVED ROAD NUMBERED PROJECT Cox Hopkins Rd $ 50,000 09/95 A ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1993-94 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend Approval BACKGROUND In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Supervisors are required to conduct a public hearing concerning the allocation and expenditure of State Secondary Funds for the previously approved projects for Fiscal Year 93/94. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION On March 24, 1992, the Board of Supervisors approved the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for 1992-1998. Roanoke County's policy as outlined by a Board report on January 28, 1992, is to revise the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan in the even numbered years and review allocations of funding in odd numbered years. In FY 92-93 VDOT had estimated that Roanoke County would receive $2,302,190, but because the State of Virginia will receive more Federal dollars this year, the allocation has been increased by $541,684 to $2,843,874. VDOT and County staff have administered this year's allocations based upon the approved Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan (see attachment). Virginia Department of Transportation is requesting action on the attached resolution as soon as possible, so that they can proceed to allocate funds to the identified projects. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS This action requires no expenditure of County funds. ~- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution adopting the funding for the Secondary Road System Six- Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1993-94. ~CTB~iITTED BY : APPROVED BY Arnold Covey, Dire for Elmer C. Hodg of Engineering & Inspections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens '"~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE FUNDING OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX- YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 27, 1993, to receive comments on the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94; and WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94 as set out on the attached construction program allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1993-94 by the Clerk to the Board. ~~ ~. ' ~. _' _____I I I I i I I I I I 1 I ~ I I I 1 I 1 N 1 C~ I N I ~ ' I I ------ I I I I O I I oo II li I I O I I ~ I I I I I I ------ rn U Ia ~{ ~ ~ I I 1 M 8 0 O .-. N I 1 ~ ~ h I ~ I ~ --"' 1 ~ i 0 ~ rt roS '~ C~ i F ~ a I . ~ 1 ---- ~i O H H 0.l z a ~o-! H ~ J ~ c... cn o ~ ~ V ~ ~ r o o ~ o H I C>. 1 H I o i I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 rn N .~ a~ v w C ro II •o 4-1 ~ H I I ~ ----- I I I I I I I ------ 1 1 I I I o I ~ 1 I I I I I 1 I ----- I I 1 1 I I M I O 1 O 1 I I I-----_ -------~ 1 I I I 1 }.! t b I ~ I O 1 ~ I ~ I ~ I }~! I ~ ' 1 I ------ I ~ I N I ~-1 II ~ I' 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 LVi I SU-i I C~ I W I }~J 1 .~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 I O 1 O °o i o I ~ i ~ 1 I I 1 I I ------ I ------ ~ I 1 ~ j I N I I I I _____ O I O I d' ~ ~ i~ i j i N I I M I N I I ----- I ------- 1 ---- I G I 1 I 1 I •.1 I I 1 j I .~ ; W I C I I ~~ I • dl I i ~ i -_ i s `~ ai i i s w O i O ~ i i • i f ~ N I UI I t0 I 1 •ri 1 H ~ 1 1 41 1 .1 I i ' a ~ i i i v m a ~ I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I ''''-- I ''''-- o I'---' ~ o - i """''''-- I ! o o ~ I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ I I N I ------ I I N 1 -'--- I I d' - 1----'--''-- I I I 1 ~ I O I '•i 1 .•i 1 r-1 1 I m I I ea I 1 to I I 1 CD I I a°a H 0 8 I I I I I 7a rn rn ~ ~+ Qp m rl O A W ~- O N p l0 h _. ,., M H .--I ~ h ~] O H 0.1 z a o o~~~ F ~ ~ U C ZZZ~ o cWn Q ~ I I is x a 1 O I O Z I v' H ~ ~ 1 I I I 1 1 I I ---- I ------- O H D ~~~a I a-- I I I ---- I I IW~ I ~7 H is 1 1 1 I I I I I it ii I I ~ I H a 3 I O~ I .--I to I N I I O I I 1 .... I W H j N I I o I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I ~~ I ~ I I 1 1 I I I I a ~~ I E+ Cz 2 x i I i x E ~ ~ a I I a t7 I O M I t1'1 V' I O 1 to I ~ UT I +l? ~ ----------- I ------ x a lf~ C•'1 I N I ~ II I I I I ______------ x ~ I I I I I CL ------------ 1 M I O I N 1 I N I ~ I I I I I I j I I ~ 1 I 1 I O I ~ ~ ~ I D I I 1 ~ z ~ ~ t~ H H ~ N 1 I (Z ~}aqI LZ G I ~ yl I ggZ ~ a~ ~ Q i ~ ; ~ 4 I ~$r] I M I u")~ I r M 1 ~' I .-1C0 1 .-1.-I I FH as I CO C' I Mc0 I N.-I I E•F ~ as I t00 I M a 1 ri i FU i am I V'im' I NOS I ri ri I FH ~ as j .... I G..H j .... I WF j .... I kaF j .... 1 L•-~H I N I H I .-i I H I d' I t1'1 1 H I M 1 O I O ------ I O - I ----------- I O - I ------------ 1 ----------- 1 - I ---- 1 I 1 I eYl I OM I M 1 c~ I <n I I I I 1 ~ I I I I 1 «') 1 1 I I I ~ I I I I I ----------- I - 1 -----'----- I - I ----------- I o - I ------------ I •a~ I mN I .-I W zpa i <r9a 1 WYI 1 .--1 Wz~ i a~a i ~~ I MN I H~ i am 1 ~a 1 M 1 q i ~~ x E --a--- O O O r '-I .--1 N lC) n f` th 1 I 1 I ~ I 1 I ~ q i~0 a ~ ~ ~ Z~ ( ~ I 1 F W I i CA r aa vQ I I I I P3 ~•-7 1 I 0 I I . -1.--I ~ a s I 11 'L I I I H I I I •• •• I WF I ---------- II -- I I I I ~ 1 I I I I O a 1 I ~~~ ~~ ~~ I ~ I I 1 I I I I 1 ii I I I Ll I I I 1 1 I ~ ~ ii ~~ ii 1 M 1 I I b I I I .--I 1 a~ ii ~~ rn rn o D CA M O HQ 00 N 17 m ~ I M '-i e-i a N D C E ~' o ro G ~ W O F W z (obi, o or~p~ O ~ O ~ 8 Q ~ o --------------------- ~ ~ ~~~ ~x ~ O N Q ~£ I-- HO WE rj r LL x M O .-I I I I 1 I I x .--I m (!? x ~ 1 1 I ~ I 1 I a i a N i o I tp 1 O I Q1 I O I to ~ ~ I 1 I --------------- 1 I 1 ---------- x ~ ~ 1 I I I 1 a 1 --------'-- I I I ~ I I 1 , i W ~ x I o 1 a i i x ~~ ~ ~ i am x i i x U I U ~ ~ I I I CY.~ I ~ I I m i ~~ ~ w ~ Cv i ~~ M 1 r-Ir I .-+~ t` I 11')t` I V'N I tf')V' 1 ITV' .-i I NCO I NM I NN 1 NN .--1 1 '-I.-1 1 .-ICO I .-1.-i 1 ri.--I a~ ~a ~ as ~ as ~ ~z ~ CLH 1 --------------- G+H I -------------- CvH----- ------ -1-----[uH ----- I [vH ------------- I N I I ~ I ~ I I CT I 1 O N I M I .-1 1 N I I N I I ~ i 1 O i O i O i O L ----------- I-- 1 I j ----------- t-- I I ------------ 1 -1------------ I I '------------- 1 1 j I I j I 1 i o I I I i ~ I I I ~ o i o . -+ M I M I M I M I M ' ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ i 11 ) 1 1 --- I I I i 1 I I I ~ I ~ N CGY. ~~ j ~ 1 a i ~~ q O ~ '..{ i CWT I O I M~ I CO i 9 I M W I ~N 1 'i ~a ------------- i ~~ --------------- ------------- M .-1 M M I I I Er I HU I I i I 1 I I ~ ~~~ ~r H rn V '- ~+ O SCE, C11 M8o w _ _ O N h O ~D 1 M Q1 aT .--I r-I N C 41 a ~ ---------- I 1 1 ------------ -- 1 I ~ I -- i 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I I ----------- -------------- i i t I I i ~ ~ I 1 1 1 1 I 1 i ~ I ~ ~ 1 1 x ~ I ~ ~ x 1 E I I i a i 1 ~ I I H ~ a H I I i c I I ~ ' ' I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G1] ~ a ------- ----- ~ W ______ --------' I _______________ I I ____- ----- ----- ~----- 1 I ~ ---- ~ - I 1 O j I H 1 I Q: I O p .-i ~ ~ p I O 1 I .i ~ ~ I I O 1 1 O ~ 1 I I N I ~ ~ i .~~ ~ N ~ I 1 1 I O I I ~ ~ 11 I N I I I ~ I 1 N ~1'I N Q1 M N O z a ~o'! H ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ O G, ~ o ~ v G to O ~6 H H I I C~-7 IQ 1 ---- I I I ^ ^ I I E II I ~~~7777 I I I ____ I I 10 IWF I rj H C la ---- 1 1 I 1 ~ I I 1 1 RS o~ ~A av N O I Ll~ i C i ~~ ~~ j lOM ~~ I r-Iri ac I I .... I G., H --------------- 1 N O ~~ 00 I I I q 07 I IOID i ~ r 1 i a~ I F. ~~ i 33 i ~ yy ~ HH I E£ I I I F ~ o o ~ ~r~n i r -1-I ~ o H 00 ~ o ~ H .... j .... 1 F 1 W [~ I Cu E I --------------- Q,' - - ------- I ~ I I I 1 I O I ------------ 1 O ~ I 1 ~ I--______°------ I I ---------- ~ I N I M I V' I ~ I l0 M 1 M I M I M I M ~ I tt'1 I ~ I ~ i ~ 1 1 I I 1 O I F I I ~ O xa~ I I H H ~ ~w 1 O ~ U c0 r-1 a~ ~ I I ~ 1 I I 2 ~ ~ i I 1 H 1 1 I N ~ (~~ -I ( I . V' 1 I l0'L 1 ~O I ~~ i a~ ------------------ 0 z i0 IG I a I EZ~ I CU7 I i I I I ~i i G7]~ i2 1 H I I I I H I I 1 I 1 I I I t I I I ~ yl I ~~ 1 I ~a ~ ~ I ~ ~ ; ~ I ~ I I 1 1 I I '~ ~ i i a ~ i i ~ ~ O ~ ~ i i H i I 1 i i a ~ 1 1 o ~ b cv ~ I t U I I I --°- ---- I M T 1 ~ ~ I 1 O 1 I ~ I~ I 1 O I 1 i~ . 1 Z 1 O ~ I .-1 I O I 1 H I to I 1 IN .--1 Y 1 t U? ?~ . p E I I ~ j 1 I 1 I ; h a c~ron ~ ~ j I I ' ---- I--- ~ ---- 1 ---------'------------ ------------- a ~~r °' Z C [OV'! H ~ J O O ti ~ O a ~ ~ q rvn o ~ ~ I I 1 I I 1 ~ I 1 ~ 1 I I i I I ~ O I N ~ ~ ; I ~ ~ I I ~ a I 1 H 'L 1 I ~ I I H 1 ~ I -Q I I ------------- ~ --- ~ - ------ ~ ------- -- ----------- I^:~] i 1 I 1~ I 1 ~ ---- --------------- ------- ~- I 1 ---- 1 - ---- ---------- I ~ ~ ~ o i ~ ~ I I i~ 1 1 , I is i i i ~ I I I I I I 1 ---- 1 - ------------~ ------ I --------~ ---------------~ ~ m i ~ ~ I I ~ 1 I ~ i ~ I 1 1 u~ I ~ ~m i i 1 --------- C~ ------------------- -------------------------- ------ I ------------- i ~ ~ ------------- i~~ ~ ------------------ i~~ ~ H -------------- ~~ ---- (J~ i ~ ~ i HH ~ ~L i HH L~ ~ i H ~ Obi rn EE-~~ U I s 1 Z ~ ~ i ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ M I i~ r-I ~ i ~ _ O i~0 3 H 1 ~ 0 ~ H Q~Q~ F I I F + O 1 ~ ~ O 1 O ~ ~' i~'~ Cs1 0 H M j0 CJ ~ ~ I ia~ I H ~ i 0~ I ~ ~ .. 10 I ~ ~ ,! i(o~ y~ I F R T ~ 5 o cy I i Z cHl~ ~ 1 C7 Z ~ i C~ ~ - - 1 2 r~ ~! ~ ° ~ i o io W o iaCi W -------- oo icU W ------- ---- o ip W ff~~ ---------- ---- t rn ~---- i i -------- io i io ~ io ~ io ~-1 ip i°- i~ 1~ 1~ IH i~ io io to ~ v i i~ i~ i~ i~ h ro ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ v IL4 I I I O ~~ - W W IU ~ IH IH 1 I ~ I (Q I ~ [~ IC ~.1 iQ is i I I H i ~ 1 I iUN 1 r~ o O Cccc777 I i I i~ i i ~ i~ H F O ,7 pa I 1 I H I ~~ ION I '~7'cJ I I ( sT~ I ~k I (~xL~ O H F Q M~ I HH , I V I .7 (> 6~ H 1 I I I O G I C lw I O [ ~ I C~ U a J ~ ~ I I I I ~ I C ILQ I GL 1 rQ 1 H a I ~~ ~ ~+ ~ "FF, O j --- j - ---' -'--- - I -- ---- -'-- I -------"--- ---- I --------- -_ ----- O N O ~ I ~ F- I I H ~ I £ ~ i ~ 1 I a Cu 5 £ i M i ~ ~ 1 I I I O I I I I W o o r n 1 -'- - I ____'___'_ _'-- I "'-"-'' ''-- 1-"-""'-'' -- 1"--'-"- --'-- i ~ i ~ ~ i U i ~ i U j ~ ~ W 0 I £ 1 r-I F I ~ I O I O j W ~ N I N I N I N I WH 1 I I H 1 O I 1 I O 1 I 1 O I I 1 O O O O O I G 1 I I I I Q1 I M I I 1 M I H I I I t1') 1 H I I 1 to I ri 1 I ___ I O _ I __________ 1 O ____ 1 ________ I O ____ I ____________ I I O __ I _________ I _____ I j I I ~. I H I N 1 'Z N I Z 7 N IW 1 H I I ~ NI ~ ~ C~ I Z ~I ~' ~I I ~I r I ~ ~t ~1 I O I OOH y [-~ I-M~ H 1 to C7 ~ I ~ H I ai 1 I M `L.' I~ H I .--I £ O I L H I .--1 H O I ~~ H I H H O I~~ H O ~ ----- ------------- W a i £ ------------- a i cn ------------------ a i vF"i -------------- a ----- to to to I I u'1 I 1 H I ~ `a~ 0 w a 0 H p~ U W ~""" L71 c rn 0 ~~~ Wes O N ~~~"'JJJ q ~` 1 M .-i .-i O C L-.7 H Cq Z C O O ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~+ O iRzW3 H o vWi o m H H O L•I a Q I ~i F7 H I OC I a I QW ~i I I li H I I ~~ a I I ~~ ~ i ~~ I Q H 1 ~+ Lz.+ H ~~ ~ 130 1 k, H ~1 Q u'1 ~~ ~~~ ~ g H~ I aZ ~~ ~ ~• a~w w~ 1 ------"---- 1 -----'------ O 1 0 O 1 q O i lC to 1 l7 ~ la I ~ W aW U U H a 0 1 r.1 H 1 H 1 ~ I a~~ i a~ HH i H H ; H H I I ~~ ~~ z z I z~ ~a 1~i~ I Ha I ~ ~ x tFn~' • f a fffnnn • 1 ttt~~~ a~W ~ w~W~ ~iw ____________ I ____________ 1 ____________ O I O I O O I O 1 0 O I O 1 0 I ~ 1 O I t1l I N ~ 1~ I~ 1 I w aq W ~ I ~ I n ~ H CA I II,r I L>~ a ~ iW i~ n ~ c I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ X t~; / O O N V i rlH i o i U OC ; OH ; OiQ 1 i I -------- ---- 1 '-'-"-- '--- I '°--'-' '--- I -'-"--' ''-- E i ~ E i o i o I I I M I N ~ I I 01 I O O o I I 1 1 1 I ------'' ~ ''-- I """'' i r-I '--- I ""'"' i ~ ---- I -"'--'- i ~ ''-- o I o I o I ~ I I U U I U ~ M I Ol I N 1 <i' N I N I q I q N I N I N I N O I O I O I O O I O I O I O 1 1 I q I q I I 1 ~ 1 1 I o I[7 1 lD I M I t` ri --- I O --- -- i O I O -'-- - ---- I - - - -'-' I -'--'-- -°- I -'------ ---- d' I O ~ 1 ~ ~D I p,' N I C. NI N1 1~ ~ 1 I ,Y, 1 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ y[~~~ I q ~ y I lD ~ I ~W' } ~ I CJ }~-+~~ I } I O~ Y}~k'~! H M H H ~ vEi p i ~ O i `D W p i g O ~ ai W wi ai S a a + I ~ 1 ~ i I Q~~ i ~ ~ EM ~~o ~~ I ~ ------ E I ~ I M 0 I o U i r M I N I I O I q I O I M M I O I N 1 M Q 7k I M [f, yl I ~ V1 H I Ct G1 a O q <D O r .--i H a 0 G N 3 3 f t\ !"~p~ v °' ~ O ~ (n " ~ A w q V' 1 f") Ql CT H ~ X a c h `a ~ I I a~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~H 1 I ~~~ 1 a i O~ ~~ N I I C,'~ ~~ 1 I Z ~ .~ tL ~ M m w M ~ Z ~~ 0 ~~ H W ~ ~ C2Q O N O !-i ~ CtJ+ Lv O O ~ c-. YI O G ~ o m A .-IN NCL) N~~~O-.II C L"i ~~ I O 1 0 I~ t i p i 0 H 1 0 ~ N I M j N 1 '-I I (!T j ~ j ~ I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ---- I 1'-"-''-'-- 1-------'''-- ~-------- - ---''-~ -------- ' ----- I ------------ 1 ------------ H QH, A ~-- I I 1 1 I' is i0 i~~ I ~w~jjH I O is I _.__ I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I F H E O O 1 [77~yy] I Q I 7. Z Z K~~ ~ H H H [H7 ~ H H ~wH i ~~ ~ ~~ ~O~ ~~o i yl~~j c _ a~~ ~o ~~q¢ In L rn ~w rn z H ~~ ~ ~L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ £ ~ w r~_ a~ €Ti a. i!~ a~ ~i a W~ a W Q ~-~ -- W--------~-p----------------------------- I .~ I N I N I a I 1 1 I I lye ! NCO I OLQQ~ I~F O .-1 O i ----------- I ----------- .-1 i -~ i o 1 0 U U ~ ~ I r+ I N 1 N I O I O i q I N 1 O I 1 O I I 1 I N 1 O I O I N O I O j -I I ~ I D O~ C I N 1 ~ C k+ ~ 1 ~ 1 D Q ~ t` M 1 ~~ C I C I .Y.. O 1 ~ C m a i ~ ` F cw a ,a ~z F n O N V' r .-i N N 0 m c.v i~ ~a i I I H I UN I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I 1 I I I O O to ~ 1 O 1D N O 1 I H I I H O O 1 I ~ -------- ------- ------- 0 ------ ------ 0 ------ ------ o 1 '''--- 1 o U U U U ~ 1 r M '-1 m 1 I N N I N i N I 1 1 1 I 1 O O O O I O O O I O 1 1 v -I . c%1 in 1 O O N c"1 I I V ~ O O I .--I I I 1 1 N N M I ~7 1 1 ~T W C Q 1 11 O H ~~ .11 ~ HH ~}}}-111 w F ~ i ~ F I--1 H ! i . -1 ~ H ~ Q C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s G G H a ~ a ~ a ~ a I -I E :. T- ~ o ~ ~ ~ O N ~0.. I r1 O~ tT H r-1 v x ~ .-~ G] a ~ ~ Z p-1 ~ N (x. o ~ o _ ?1 O ^ V] O 2 I 1 I H ~ I H 1 ~ ~ ?~ 2WW H I I 1 ~~H 1 Z t p aw i v~ ~ ~ `is a H ,ri \I z ~~]] £ LsJ O I a ~ of a H ~ ~1 I p' ~~i 1 a ~~ I -'°'" W Q I --' W I -°------"--- t O I O ~ t I O I O ~ I ~'1 I ~ 1 1 I 1 I ~ I ~ 1 1 I I -----' 1 j I -----_ ~ I 1 I _--'--"'----- I H ~ Nz I 1 ~ £ ~ ^ ~©-I O a I I '- W -"--- 1 ---- I "--- 1 I O O i O I rFQ' I Yr _~_ j 1 I H ~ I i i q II IF fH H 7 i (r] I UC I 1 I I I 1 1 H ~ H I I I I ~ li W I I i i I I I I 1 I ~ 1 C7 N I I N 1 O I '-1 I INQ ~ IH~ a N m a 0 O Lc~ [W-a I UC 1 I I C I W 1 1 1 H H I I I 1 I r ~ ~ ~ W ~ 1 ~ I I 1 I W O N ~Y' N N N N V W H~ U W z H ~ I I 1 I ~ o I 1 I o I I ~ I 1 ii I I ~ --'--"- ---' ~ --'---- ---- I I I O I f~ 1 1 U i p it I I ~ ~j j N 1 1 I O I O 1 1 CD I m I 1 j O I OI ( I j 1 ~ I t7 I I I CJ I C1 I e-i I .__._~_ ---- I .i I ________ 1 1 ______ I t 1 I ~ aQ; ~ j -1 ~ I I I I as 1 1 1 .-1 W . as I ~ E'+ ~ I © Q 1 O~ ~2 ,,.{ ~ r-1 H I 1 I ~ ~ O I 0 I I aii ai v T-a V' 6~ .-i YI H O ~ ~_ `~ ~ a W G N o ~ I M O H ri v C r H ~ ~ ~ ~-a z o ~ 2 ~ O m ~ ~ Q O C~ vWFi 20 F O ~ O ~' ~ O CJ ~ D UI ^ ------- I I ---------------- ~ I ---------------- I --------------- I I 1 i Ft7 C7 z H I I ~ ~Q I I I I I 1 z I ~( ] W I I I 7 ., I ~~ C ~ QYIO ~ ~ I ~ i ~ I I I I I I I [~ ~~F ~ ~''2 ~ J, H I H i I I I ~ ~ ' ' ~ a I I Lil d I I I a 1 ''-- I '_'___---'-- I- '--------- 1 "- ----------- I I I I O I O I 11 0 ~F N CJ O V' I I O I O I 11 0 G1 to N O r I z I O I O I I I O r-I N ~ O N I HO I O 1 O I 1 1 0 N Ol N O c"f I F I to 1 r-I I I I l0 M ~['1 Q~ lD V` 1 1 ~ I ~ I 11~ f4 N N O ~ I I I I I I N N I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ zR ~ I ~ I ~ -'-- i a m ~ 1 ~ I I I I p i F i I a I t`~ 1 I ~z i 1O° I ~ 1 ww 1 I ~ ~~ i x~ ~~ ~o i I I H I I I j .. .. ~ I L- F 1 I •• •• I Cz+ F I I 1 I 1 I I __ __ 1 ________ ____ I ________ ____ 1 ______________ I E i ~ ~ i In i o I N 1 I l0 I 1 I 1 I w I O I O I I ~ I I I I I I 1 I __ __ 1 ________ I .--I ____ 1 ________ I r-I ____ I ______________ I I I I O 1 O I I O i l i z I \O 1 M I I ~ ~ i ° i a i a (s77 ( H ~j 1 O 1 O 1 I O (...' I O I O I I a i ~ i rn i H I ~ 1 I I ~ I ~ I I '- t o -- 1 ------'- t o ---- I "'----- I I ---- 1 -------''----- 1 a O H N W I Z I I I H H I O Q I O~ I I C ~ 1 >C HI F I I a i a a -- ------------ -------------- -------------------- I ~ ~ EQ ~ N U ~w ~ O a ~ OF ~~ ~ I E H ~ 1 L] ~ O w a o z n ~ ~ °w e qa o ~3 ~ 1 W ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 2 ° H z o ~ w [ + [ r ( ~ [ Z I N N l~ t'+ T-~ The following road projects in this years's budget by County NUMBERED CONSTF PROJECT PRIORITY # NAME #21 #22 #23 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #32 #52 #53 #54 #54 #55 #55 #1 have been identified for funding staff and VDOT: :UCTION PROJECTS ALLOCATION ESTIMATED AMOUNT ADVERTISIIKII~T DATE West River Rd $365,000 01/94 Merriman Rd $400,000 06/94 Starlight Ln $100,000 09/93 Starlight Ln $300,000 09/93 Cresthill Dr $ 25,000 01/95 Yellow MT Rd $416,000 09/95 Glade Creek Rd $ 50,000 08/94 Lost MTN Rd $ 25,000 12/94 Benois Rd $ 25,000 05/95 Bunker Hill Dr $260,748 02/94 Colonial Ave $125,000 10/94 Timberview Rd $ 30,000 08/95 Hollins Rd $ 50,000 06/96 Florist Rd $ 20,000 07/96 Ardmore Dr $ 25,000 07/95 Ardmore Dr $ 25,000 07/95 Clearwater Ave $ 25,000 07/95 Clearwater Ave $ 25,000 07/95 UNPAVED ROAD NUMBERED PROJECT Cox Hopkins Rd $ 50,000 09/95 .-•~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINIBTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLIITION 72793-12 PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238(E) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT THROUGH SEPARATE PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY JEAN O. WALLACE, ^"^n^" ""' ~"T"" _"-- d34N@B;i~- CHARLES W. BOONE AND ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN FEE SIMPLE FROM THE HEIRS AT LAW OF JAMES W. CASEY, JR. AND MARGARETTE E. CASEY FOR THE WATER TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT Following a public hearing of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m., after due notice to the public, this Board makes the following findings of fact and adopted the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Water Transmission Line Project has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of Roanoke County. 2. That the project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a long-term water source in Roanoke County. 3. That acquisition of an interest in certain parcels of land, described below, is necessary for construction of water transmission lines from the Roanoke County Water Treatment Plant to southwest Roanoke County. 4. In order to complete this Project, the County needs to acquire an interest in the properties described below: (a) OWNER: Jean O. Wallace; property description: Parcel of land located on Brahma Road and Burnham Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 76.03-3-70) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT A" showing water and sewer easement to be acquired from Jean O. Wallace. -Geror~=~eea-te~-~s e•~-e~~s~a~e~ (c) OWNER: Col. Charles W. Boone; property description: Parcel of land located off of Lapping Lane, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 65.00-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT C" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from Col. Charles W. Boone. (d) OWNER: Heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey; property description: Parcel of land located on 4000 block of Buck Mountain Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 97.08-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT D" showing parcel of land in fee simple to be acquired from the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. 2 5. That the fair market value of the interest in the property to be taken and damages to the residue of such property, if any, is as follows: PROPERTY OWNER FAIR MARKET VALUE AND DAMAGES, IF ANY Jean O. Wallace $ 913.00 Col. Charles W. Boone 221.00 Heirs at Law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey 2,950.00 6 . That Mrs . Wallace, "~ . ~ ~A~i T"""'c:=-- and Col . Boone have been offered the amounts listed in paragraph 5 above for an interest in their property and that each offer was refused by such landowners. The County has not made an offer to the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey because such heirs cannot be located. Therefore, the only way of acquiring the land described above is by condemnation. 7. That it is necessary for the County to immediately enter upon and take possession of the properties described above and commence construction of such water transmission lines and any other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to the above-described property as provided by law and by this resolution the County hereby states its intent to do so. 3 8. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1- 238(E) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Board finds that it is necessary to be vested with those powers granted the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Sections 33.1- 119 through 33.1-129, both inclusive, in order to enter upon the property to be condemned prior or during the condemnation proceeding for the construction of water transmission lines and any other appurtenances to the water supply system as described above. 9. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby condemn the interest in the properties shown on Exhibit A, ~ C and D attached hereto and made a part of this resolution and authorizes the County Administrator and the County Attorney to sign all papers and documents necessary to this end on behalf of the County. 10. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors shall in accordance with Section 15.1-238(E) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, be vested with those powers granted to the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Section 33.1- 119 through 33.1-129, both inclusive, in order to enter upon and take the condemned property prior to or during the condemnation proceeding so that the construction and maintenance of the water transmission lines as described above may be commenced immediately the Board of Supervisors shall perform the duties and functions required of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner in such statutes. 11. That notice of this condemnation setting forth the compensation offered shall be sent by certified mail to the 4 landowners who can be located as described above on or before July 30, 1993. 12 . That the law firm of Martin, Hopkins and Lemon, P. C. shall be the duly authorized agent and attorney for the County for the purpose of instituting condemnation proceedings and the handling of the acquisition of these properties for the County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution with the removal of George R. and Wanda C. Janosko, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~6s~~ ~~w Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney William B. Hopkins, Jr., Counsel for Roanoke County Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 72793-12 authorizing the acquisition of an easement through separate parcels of land adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. /Yla--~~"' ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5 1 N-IfLIJIa~PINia It.INJ ol'~i,ml.Im UIa 4 N -Ir II I I lull 'Z i- O m y in aiU O h m I a, I m I~'II IiJI l~ll I' N N J mIrnIN zz zlz z z zz.z z~ m ~~ZINININ~N Irn m~~lal ilu U ~IOI- O f~l =' alts N N to b a OlU .U 'IplO Ugly ( i;?. .~.,i, 7lNlnlm Dl ..i m _ ._ m A __ _ m »NI I ~NIN " rnltw~N N~I_'_~,~~~~N U O UI mINi~lm imlmlm ~ ~ m iOIOO 4 cnl~~mlJ - I^ oli~io~N ~I'm -IOINI~~o m~olN NN~:~:I~io N~~ oim rn m 'O .~j~n flu; .~^'- _I Im £~ A oD~ ©o~ D A ., s _ ~ ° ~ rn r AO ~ /' , ~~ 'Z m i nti I ~- ~, m ~ / GRID NORTH - NPD-83 m J O N °i o Z O -' VIRGINIA STATE PLANE ONE T / ` p. ~ m N ~ v z H Z SOU / m m S _ ~ ~ rn N \ ~ D O ~]. ' ~ ~ x ~ D m0~ ~x ~ ~ ~ >y,\ U U 'Ux0! OSmmrn I ~O :~9 ~~- v ~ S ~ +AOAO / ~ N U / ~ m AOOI I p ~n -{n DV m mr I O ~ - _ m m I / I I I `L`l O O m =9x ~ O Z S NN~~T / %i ~ / 4 b~0.90 ~r/ Q .Q D n°y m'< i ~ /: ;~ p~ " ~~ I I N - u na I . a ~ ` I ~, r ^T_+~ 1 ~ ~ - \~ \ I` m I~ 1 _-____ I ~ '-__ \ \ ~ OHO D I a m ~ ~ _ ~ II ~ i/~ _ I I O ~ o Z ~ nF rn r AO _ vv a ~ vim. ~ ~ ~ ' ,\ / ~ D ;I myvx ~Z F b mmr Ax OmmKU nN ~1 , ~ ~ / O~rn O~J 'u~rr^m eOOy~I N7m .-. ~ l r ~ O I I vF~U O~< I x Cf n_-~O x 00 N r~R ... f ~ /~`,~ 0= a ti ADO I OlO~1 O i X0 uZZ ~ R~ n ~~ ~ "' ~ . o Co O \( D;O~ ~ ~N a y z O a/ _ _ ~ ~' Zµ~ / _ ;. O '~ / c _ ` N ~F~ ~ _- ~ x ' \~p0''iS mD~c~ ms ~p Sp7NN -~"' ___ p ~LObEZO/ a£znps mz~x-,.'_^a coy ~ --~ 3' ~Dm;m~`"£DNypD n m zn ~m am x Z N C S ~DN m ~ m ~n00 r v N "mo z ~ Rio ~ \ m D x N \ x / ~~ ~ o~ -rn / ~ D x ~ x O a Z ~ m jAAx _y00! m m a I ~ ! ! ~ ~O' ` ~O m Du m0 ~ ~m to ~ I X ~9ZpO D < I ~ I I 1 \ ~ - 9 A W m o~AS ~ > A m m a D ^~ m ti Y~ D D L Z Am = >~~L \\ DDm£-in Dr D N SmmK'~`D mOOU~A - V1 ~ T ~ O m J 9 a m~Z~'1 J !~ O m~~x A ~ I D O O -1mAA X m Z~ .9 Z D Z N O Z~ i Z D Z m ~mN £R ~ Z o ~ W ` O 0 O jD iD £O ~ ' es! ?A . ~p ,( ~" \7~' N Ox bOmm N tiZA f~l ^~ DAa mJ~OLm 5 ~n~~ IA AO~n r.~m Nf Yla v£AU Cl~<I u m .. I m=~ ~ xD2 o ~ Nm AO v `p i yrn~0< p00O OrnO~~SOV A ~m- y~ m~6 ~ ZOC p O IN ~ I z~ u O m N-z- ~' = v zm ~m a J Lam N (7 .~ i ~ Din O~~m ~ p( u N r i m nm i~Zn ZqZ Lam~O p < r m~ L-J ~y L ~ D OI ; T.O~~ p=~ mm OO O II m•yCm m m~ ~~y rn ~ ~~~• i ~U] II ~ n . .n ~ vl z ~I D ~ I v ~ I ~n ~ - D~ DD z0 T rod mO O 9 O ~ O OJ r _ r-~ L-J {i KI F ;Op~ C~ O v n~ne~nD O ~ X D~z ~ ' ~ ~ AI m I O~~ J O O~ Nm~m Z V1 I-~ C1 / //~~ V i ~ D I x ~ z- ~ m m ~ a I+1 G Q' m A ~_J N I I r~ O O C, m +~ K ~ m m m ~ m ' I ^ ° o " ^9 I ~ ~ '"'3 ~l y m o C"" ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I x I Z~ o r. ~ R1 I ~ C~ '. mom ~ n O A -~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 'y ~ , l ~ ~o m ~ Imo' - n mr~ ~ o O ~ A~ C ~ `nn z 7-. ` ~ l'J I ~? I i II ` I Dn o - l ~, m~ Ompx ~ '^ 'p Z~ I ~ c ~ ~ ~ y A z K T ' ` rm _ DOm m ~ Z b~0 C~ I `~rOix + Ct n ~ ~ _ L J m C ymr N W O~ ~., F C nW °O z iQ TAX x/65.00-1-43 PROPERTY OF GRACE LEE HALE HUDSON /\ U.B. 1355, PG. 1108 S 44'33'45" E ~+ oa d W 1 126'1 EX. 18" z z SLACK OAK \ n IQN N zo ~ ~' CHESTNUT OAK + ~ ~s ~ - IIEIY t6' N'ATERLIiE EAd II~M' 10' TEl/oORARY - carsrRUCnoN ~amvrs EX. PRIVATE DRIVE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 S 44'33'45' E 30.34 2-3 S 10'54 43 W 68.74 3-4 S 09'15 00 E 321.48 4-5 S 05'59 09 E 159.24 5-6 S 27'24 41 E 230.39 6-7 S 47'1615 W 25.92 7-6 N 27'24 41 W 241.97' 8-9 N 05'59 09' W 163.26 9-10 N 09'15 00 W 325.21 10-1 N 10'54 43 E 90.39 TO TAL AREA = 20 010 S.F. LEGEND EX. EXISTING D.B. DEED BOOK PG. PAGE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT S.F. SQUARE FEET fy~~` DO /a k 'y,\4j , ,~~o~ ~ ~ \ ,~ : \~ ::..\\ ; \~ TAX tP65.00-1-2 PERTY OF ::•:\\ PRO \\::. ~ DAVID E. THOMAS k ~ MARTHA M. THOMAS W.B. 22, PG. 497 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON k EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 13 AUGUST 1992. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATERLINE EASEMENT = 20,010 S.F. 4. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 171. B. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 432, PG. 97. C. CHESAPEAKE k POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 282, PG. 386. D. WATER RIGHTS 6c RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 229, ?G. 553. E. WATER RIGHTS do RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 223, PG. 397. F, RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 103, PG. 597. G. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 91, PG. 167. H. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 61, PG. 3. I. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 174. PLAT SHOWING NEW 25' WATERLINE & NEW 10' TEMPORARY ~~AtiTH OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS Co-14-93yf''E'~ BEING GRANTED TO B. LEE xz THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE HENDERSON, JR. ~z BY ~• N~~8~~ = CHARLES W. BOONE ACROSS TAX #65.00-1-42 l p4 ~ S17R`~ SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: 9 JUNE 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (~ 1[::11 If .:j,1. 11:::11 11 :11 11:;11 11 `:jl 9 4 Ik l~ If;:~l I Ifs:<II 5 / ~~ TAX x/65.00-1-1 PROPERTY OF FIARRY C. MAUNEY k MARY D. MAUNEY D.B. 1287, PG. 1428 - EX. 6" POST OAK X60.2' TAX ~j65.00-1-42 PROPERTY OF CHARLES W. BOONE D.B. 1401, PG. 292 EXHIBIT D EX. I.P. BEARS '~~ ~- PROPERTY OF N 70'12'00' W 200' p(, I.P. BEARS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA N 7012'00' W FROM CORNER Iy3 N 70'12'00 W 100.00' (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) 59.00' ACT.) i FROM CORNER ~3 D.B. 444, PG. 438 60.00' DEED) ~ i D.B. 785, PG. 169 ~SS~ya~ G~ 5°~ o ~'n ~ r~, .-cy ~o I mm w NZ ~~'.c ~o rn SET I.P. EX. N.P.S. MONUMENT PORTION OF LOT 18 i ~ ~ ~ rn ~ fV N / i i 11 / i ~ ~~ S~' ~ ,~~ ~P~e ~S O•G ~ ~~'(J~p~' ~ EX. 20' WATERLINE ~P i ~ EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ D.B. 1381, PG. 662 i i i ._ ii ,~ i ~ // ~ N i ~~ ~ EX. 10' TEMPORARY ~ i CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ~ ~ D.B. 1381, PG. 662 ,~ ~ ~ i TAX /97.08-t-42 ~ / TAX X97 08-1-41 ~ PROPERTY OF JAMES W., Jr. do MARGARETTE E. CASEY 3 0.8. 836, PG. 142 w c D.B. 765, PG. 108 0 0 17,307 S.F. ~ ~ 0.397 Ac. v fN z LFCEN~ EX. EXISTING I.P. IRON PIN N.P.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACT. ACTUAL R/W RIGHT OF WAY D.B. DEED BOOK PG. PAGE EX. N.P.S. ~ MONUMENT 015.87' - - PROPERTY OF FRANK E. MILLS D.B. 1229, PG. 320 LOT 17 MAP OF THOMAS H. BEASLEY SUBDIVISION P.B. 3, PG. 61 EX. SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT D.B. 777, PG. 586 - - 4 ~ SET I.P. SET I.P. S 69'28'02' E 5s.o1' ACT.) BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD - - - J 60.00' DEED) VA. SEC. RTE. #679 R/W VARIES NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON A CURRENT FlELD SURVEY. 2 THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFlT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON ~ EDWARDS, P. C., DATED 1 JUNE 1992. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIG- NATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFlED BY ACTUAL FlELD ELEVATIONS. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. VIRGINIA do TENNESSEE TELEPHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 73, PG. 38. B. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 426, PG. 382. C. WATER LINE EASEMENT RESERVED, P.B. 3, PG. 61. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON IS AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT, D.B. 777, PG. 586. B. 50' EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 752, PG. 588. PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY (0.397 Ac.) BEING CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AyTH OF BY ~ D ~ l 0~' 'pr 3-~Z-~ JAMES W. CASEY, Jr. & ~~ g, LEE .~ MARGARETTE E. CASEY ~ HENDERSON, JR. Q a~ y, SITUATED ALONG BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD `J'_ CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT No. 1480 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA l~ ~~04' TAX #97.08-1-42 SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 12 MARCH 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNER S ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238(E) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT THROUGH SEPARATE PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY JEAN O. WALLACE, GEORGE R. AND WANDA C. JANOSKO, CHARLES W. BOONE AND ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN FEE SIMPLE FROM THE HEIRS AT LAW OF JAMES W. CASEY, JR. AND MARGARETTE E. CASEY BACKGROUND' As part of the Water Transmission Line Project, a number of properties have been previously acquired. The County has been unable to reach an agreement with the following landowners: Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko and Charles W. Boone. The County cannot reach an agreement with the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey because such heirs cannot be located. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The subject properties are necessary for the Water Transmission Line Project in order to construct water transmission lines from the Roanoke County Water Treatment Plant to various parts of the County. These parcels of land are owned by the persons described above and are more particularly described as follows: (a) OWNER: Jean O. Wallace; property description: Parcel of land located on Brahma Road and Burnham Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 76.03-3-70) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT A" showing water and sewer easement to be acquired from Jean 0. Wallace. In an effort to reach a settlement with Mrs. Wallace, the County offered $913.00 to Mrs. Wallace. Mrs. Wallace, through her attorney, declined this offer and requested $12,975. Consequently, it is necessary at this time to go forward with eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction as previously directed by the Board. 7~ The County obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value and damages to the residue for the proposed acquisition of the Jean O. Wallace property from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition is $913.00. The proposed permanent easement is 50 feet wide and 1,823.4 feet long. The total easement area is 91,000 square feet. Because of the width of the permanent easement, there is no need for a temporary construction easement. Mr. Robertson valued the permanent easement at $912.64; and placed no damages to the residue. The total estimated value of the taking was rounded off to $913.00. (b) OWNER: George R. and Wanda C. Janosko; property description: Parcel of land located south of Crystal Creek Drive, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map Nos. 97.01-2-2 and 97.01-2-3) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT B" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko. The County made a written offer of $378.00 to Mr. and Mrs. Janosko. Mr. and Mrs. Janosko have agreed to this amount, but have imposed additional terms to the proposed agreement. The County may be able to reach a final agreement with the Janoskos before July 27. If not, as with the Jean O. Wallace property, it is necessary to institute eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction. The County obtained an independent appraisal of the Janosko property from Earl G. Robertson. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition is $378.00. The proposed permanent easement is 20 feet wide and 331 feet long and runs parallel to a road which cuts through the property. The total easement area is 6,620 square feet. Mr. Robertson determined the value of the permanent easement to be $334.00; the value of the temporary construction easement as $34.00 and zero damages to the residue. The total estimated value of the taking, therefore, is $378.00. (c) OWNER: Col. Charles W. Boone; property description: Parcel of land located off of Lapping Lane, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 65.00-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT C" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from Col. Charles W. Boone. 2 ~- 3 The County made a written offer on July 21, 1993 to Col. Charles W. Boone of $221.00. Col. Boone has not accepted the offer and has not made a counter-offer. Based on a conversation between an agent of the County and Col. Boone, he is not expected to accept this offer. Accordingly, it is necessary to start eminent domain proceedings to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction. Earl G. Robertson also appraised the Boone property. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition to be $221.00. The proposed permanent easement is 25 feet wide and contains 20,010 square feet. A 10 feet wide construction easement runs along both sides of the permanent easement and contains 16,008 square feet. Mr. Robertson valued the permanent easement at $201.00, the temporary construction easement at $20.00 and placed no damages to the residue for a total of $221.00. (d) OWNER: Heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey; property description: Parcel of land located on 4000 block of Buck Mountain Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 97.08-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT D" showing parcel of land in fee simple to be acquired from the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. The County cannot locate the Casey heirs. Accordingly, there have been no negotiations. Consequently, it is necessary at this time to go forward with eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction as previously directed by the Board The County obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value of the proposed acquisition of the Casey property from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value of the proposed acquisition is $2,950. The lot to be acquired has 18,000 square feet or 0.41 acres. Mr. Robertson valued the fee simple interest in this lot at $2,950. This is a total take in fee, therefore, there are no damages to the residue and no need for a temporary construction easement. FISCAL IMPACT' Funds are available from the Water Transmission Line Project to pay the appraised value of these properties. ALTERNATIVES' 3 ~'"` 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of and immediate right of entry to the subject properties identified above by eminent domain proceedings. 2. Authorize a counter-offer to Mrs. Wallace and solicit a counter-offer from Col. Boone. Authorize approval of change in terms of easement agreement requested by Mr. and Mrs. Janosko. The property of the Casey heirs can only be acquired by condemnation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Counsel recommends that the Board adopt a resolution pursuant to Section 15.1-238(E) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and authorize the County Administrator, the County Attorney and Martin, Hopkins and Lemon, P.C. to take such steps as may be necessary to acquire the property, together with all rights incident thereto, by eminent domain proceedings. Respectfully submitted, `~ ,~ --, William B. Hopki Jr. Counsel for Roanoke County Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, "~~,~ o Elmer C. odge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 4 EXHIBIT B n 0o w ~~ za 1 ~~ ~ N N = Z cLS~ ~55tn TAX (96.08-1-4 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELS ~ _L6ERT H. WALDRON D.B. 1327, PC. 918 ~W ~ rar~oR~r cokarAUCnoN ~selwo~rr ~r:a W~ru r a~re~ C >Ei18E~NT _ ~ ~ - i- PROPERTY OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) ~'~A ~-- EX MARKED ' 42 I RED OAK tAX X97.01-2-5 PROPERTY OF 7.D. STEEIE k ~ ELBERT H. WALDRON $~ D.B. 793, PC. 124 4 ^~~., ___ ~- 1 S 86'08'111 W~,~ u.~ EX. PARKWAY MONUMENT W ~~_ ;--EX. EAST TENNESSEE n NATURAL CAS CO. ~ '~ . EASEMENT D.B. 751, PG. 455 ~ ~~~~ NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATER do SEWER AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PUT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, IfMON, Le EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 6 JULY. 1992 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATER do SEWER EASEMENT ~ 6,620 S.F. 4. IT IS THE INTENT OF TH1S PLAT TO CREATE THE 20' WATER 8c SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY EASEMENT RECORDED IN D.B. 751, PG. 455. 5. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. DAM, ROAD do WATER RIGHTS RESERVED, D.B. 202, PC. 267. B. 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY, D.B. 142. PG. 348. C. ROAD AGREEMENTS, D.B. 480, PG. 66. D. ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS, D.B. 1005, PC. 119, D.B. 233, PG. 598, D.B. 1288, PG. 1396. E. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENTS, D.B. 293, PG. 59, D.B. 475, PG. 307. F. ACCESS AGREEMENT, D.B. 454, PG. 468. 6. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMDRANC:: A. EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 751, PG. 455. PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' WATER & SEWER EASEMENT -- ~I~D ~Ei~ ~~' TEivIPO~RARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT NEW 20' WATER k SEWER EASEMENT UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N 77'35 Ot W 57.48 2-3 S 84'46 04 W 266.67 3-4 N 43316 W 25.50 4--5 N 84'48 04 E 285.59 5-6 S 77'35 Ot f 52.36 6-i S 09'43 38 E 21.59 TOTAL AREA e 6 620 S. F. - EX FENCE ON UNE (TYP.) TAX (97.01-2-2 PROPERTY OF p~, ~~ GEORGE R. JANOSKO be POST WANDA C. JANOSKO O.B. 1288, PC. 1396 SCALD: BEING GRANTED 70 THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY GEORGE R. JANOSKO & WANDA C. JANOSKO ACROSS TAX X97.01-2-2 1" 100' DATE: 22 OCTOEER 1992 REVISED: 28 JUNE 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ... ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 7- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238 (E) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT THROUGH SEPARATE PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY JEAN O. WALLACE, GEORGE R. AND WANDA C. JANOSKO, CHARLES W. BOONE AND ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN FEE SIMPLE FROM THE HEIRS AT LAW OF JAMES W. CASEY, JR. AND MARGARETTE E. CASEY FOR THE WATER TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT Following a public hearing of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m., after due notice to the public, this Board makes the following findings of fact and adopted the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Water Transmission Line Project has been approved to provide a source of water for the citizens of Roanoke County. 2. That the project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will provide a long-term water source in Roanoke County. 3. That acquisition of an interest in certain parcels of land, described below, is necessary for construction of water transmission lines from the Roanoke County Water Treatment Plant to southwest Roanoke County. 4. In order to complete this Project, the County needs to acquire an interest in the properties described below: ~~ (a) OWNER: Jean 0. Wallace; property description: Parcel of land located on Brahma Road and Burnham Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 76.03-3-70) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT A" showing water and sewer easement to be acquired from Jean O. Wallace. (b) OWNER: George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko; property description: Parcel of land located south of Crystal Creek Drive, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map Nos. 97.01-2-2 and 97.01-2-3) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT B" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko. (c) OWNER: Col. Charles W. Boone; property description: Parcel of land located off of Lapping Lane, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 65.00-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT C" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from Col. Charles W. Boone. (d) OWNER: Heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey; property description: Parcel of land located on 4000 block of Buck Mountain Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 97.08-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT D" showing parcel of land in fee simple to be acquired from the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. 2 T3 5. That the fair market value of the interest in the property to be taken and damages to the residue of such property, if any, is as follows: PROPERTY OWNER Jean O. Wallace George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko Col. Charles W. Boone Heirs at Law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey FAIR MARKET VALUE AND DAMAGES, IF ANY $ 913.00 378.00 221.00 2,950.00 6. That Mrs. Wallace, Mr. and Mrs. Janosko and Col. Boone have been offered the amounts listed in paragraph 5 above for an interest in their property and that each offer was refused by such landowners. The County has not made an offer to the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey because such heirs cannot be located. Therefore, the only way of acquiring the land described above is by condemnation. 7. That it is necessary for the County to immediately enter upon and take possession of the properties described above and commence construction of such water transmission lines and any other appurtenances to the water supply system in order to more adequately serve the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County and to institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to the above-described property as provided by law and by this resolution the County hereby states its intent to do so. 3 ,i "~ 8. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1- 238(E) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Board finds that it is necessary to be vested with those powers granted the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Sections 33.1- 119 through 33.1-129, both inclusive, in order to enter upon the property to be condemned prior or during the condemnation proceeding for the construction of water transmission lines and any other appurtenances to the water supply system as described above. 9. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby condemn the interest in the properties shown on Exhibit A, B, C and D attached hereto and made a part of this resolution and authorizes the County Administrator and the County Attorney to sign all papers and documents necessary to this end on behalf of the County. 10. That the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors shall in accordance with Section 15.1-238(E) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, be vested with those powers granted to the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner pursuant to Section 33.1- 119 through 33.1-129, both inclusive, in order to enter upon and take the condemned property prior to or during the condemnation proceeding so that the construction and maintenance of the water transmission lines as described above may be commenced immediately the Board of Supervisors shall perform the duties and functions required of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner in such statutes. 11. That notice of this condemnation setting forth the compensation offered shall be sent by certified mail to the 4 T3 landowners who can be located as described above on or before July 30, 1993. 12. That the law firm of Martin, Hopkins and Lemon, P.C. shall be the duly authorized agent and attorney for the County for the purpose of instituting condemnation proceedings and the handling of the acquisition of these properties for the County. 5 B n Q~ W C za I~ ~~~ K N =z~ oa ~s~ NEW 20' WATER do SEWER EASEMENT uNE DIRECnON DISTANCE 1-2 N 77'35 Ol W 57.46 2-3 S 84'46 04 W 266.67 3-4 N 43'3316 W 25.50 4-5 N 8448 04 E 285.59 5-6 5 77'35 Ot E 52.36 6-1 S 09'43 38 E 21.59 TOTAL AREA - 6 E20 S. F. - EX. FENCE ON UNE (TYP.) EX FENCE POST TAX }96.08-1-4 y PROPERTY of T.D. STEELS k ~ ~!• =L9ERT H. WALDRON ~~'~ D.B. 1327, PG. 918 7AX /97.01-2-2 PROPERTY OF GEORGE R. JANOSKO do WANDA C. JANOSKO D.B. 1288, PC. 1396 f3 EX. MARKED 42' RED OAK TAX X97.01-2-5 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELE !c y ELBERT H. WALDRON ~ D.B. 793, PC. 124 1'~~. AEW !6' Tfi~ORdRI' -` COIIfBTR!!CTION lril ddrllfT ~ ~r sa W~ rrR ~ a~rer- 5 ~i18f~MT _ - ~. - - --- x PROPERTY of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) S 86'08'1 ' W 134.80 N ~I T 42" ~s~•3 EX. PARKWAY MONUMENT 1 SEX. EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO.~ _ EASEMENT D.B. 751, PG. 455 ~ 1 ` 1 _ 'k NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATER & SEWER AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON, k EDWARDS, P,C., DATED 6 JULY, 1992 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATER do SEWER EASEMENT ~ 6,620 S.F. 4. IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT TO CREATE THE 20' WATER 8c SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL CAS COMPANY EASEMENT RECORDED tN D.B. 751, PG. 455. 5. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. DAM, ROAD do WATER RIGHTS RESERVED, 0.8. 202. PC. 297. B. 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY, D.B. 142, PG. 348. C. ROAD AGREEMENTS, D.B. 480, PG. 66. D. ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS, D.B. 1005, PG. 119, D.B. 233, PG. 598, D.B. 1288, PG. 1396. E. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER G0. EASEMENTS, D.B. 293, PG. 59, D.B. 475, PG. 307. F. ACCESS AGREEMENT, D.B. 454, PC. 468. 6. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT AFF~CTr-D BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUM©RANCE: A. EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 751, PG. 455. PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' WATER & SEWER EASEMENT ~I~D I~Ei~ ~~-' ~'EMP~RARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT dyTg ~Gp BEING GRANTED TO o~ `+3o~r~c~~ THE COUNT B OF ROANOKE ~~ HENDER ON, JR. ~% GEORGE R. JANOSKO & ~•~~48. ot.1.~. ~ WANDA C. JANOSKO ~, ~- ACROSS 7AX X97.01-2-2 SCALE: 1" ~ 100' DATE: 22 OCTOBER 1992 REVISED: 28 JUNE 1993 LLTMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ... ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~~ t , P ~ ,. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 72793-13 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRIISTEES OF THE MASON COVE CHAPEL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHIIRCH BIIILDING LOCATED AT 3917 OLD CATAWBA ROAD (TAX PARCEL 15.02-1-10) CATAWBA MAGISTE- RIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Trustees of Mason Cove Chapel have filed a petition to allow the expansion of an existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 22, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of an existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Trustees of the Mason Cove Chapel to allow the expansion of an 1 existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 u-- Q a NORTH _ ~~ DEPARZ'i~NT OF PLANNING PETITIONER: MASON COVE CHAPEL AND ZONING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 15.02-1-10 ~? •. REQUEST: SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND CHURCH ~rn ~-i PETITIONER: MASON COVE CHAPEL CASE NUMBER: 19-7/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 6, 1993 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Mason Cove Chapel for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing church building, located at 3917 Old Catawba Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if future expansion of the church is included in the request. Staff said that in addition to the immediate expansion, plans for a future addition are also included in the request. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton, cretary Roanoke ntv Pl 'ng Commission ~.- i STAFF REPORT PART I B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of Mason Cove Chapel to obtain a Special Use Permit in order to expand an existing church. The 2.05 acre site is located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner's request includes a immediate plans for a 30' x 50' addition -- a ground floor fellowship hall and a basement for classrooms -- as well as a possible future addition a similar size. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The site is zoned AR. This zoning district allows churches only by Special Use Permit. Use and design standards for this use type include additional landscaping requirements for parking areas and outdoor activities when adjoining residential use types, a building coverage maximum of 20$, and a lot coverage maximum of 50~ of the total lot area. The petitioner's request appears to comply with these standards. Site Plan. review will be required prior to issuing the building permit in order to ensure compliance with all County ordinances. 1 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~_f PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location - The site is located on Old Catawba Road, off of Bradshaw Road, and is surrounded by rural residential uses. The general area is rural residential and agricultural. Existing Physical Development - In addition to the existing building, the site contains both paved and graveled parking areas. Topoctral~hy/Vegetation - The site is wooded/partially wooded on three sides and a creek branch/drainage way runs across the eastern boundary. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout - The future layout of the site will remain similar to the existing layout. No additional parking areas are proposed at this time, nor are any required since the worship area is not being expanded now. Utilities - The site is served by private well and septic. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is designated Rural Village in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Rural community centers, such as churches, that serve the needs of the community are considered compatible and are encouraged within this land use designation. D. CONFORMANCE WITH PURPOSES OF ZONING ORDINANCE The site is zoned AR. The AR district recognizes that these areas will become increasingly more residential and that institutional uses to serve the needs of the community are compatible. The petitioner's expansion is proposed in order to better serve the needs of the growing community. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff does not anticipate any negative impacts from the proposed expansion. Strengths of the petition include consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and with the purposes of the AR zoning district. PREPARED BY: LYNN DONIHE DATE: July 6, 1993 2 Fnr staff use only ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 dateleceived: ~,-z~ - 53 received by: applica ' n fle: Z date: placards' sued: Bo$ da~ ~.~- , /y Case Number. /~ .~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING JG~SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Y)')ASO~ CoV~ ChAPEL Phone: 3$'`I"7Ig6 Address: 3 Q /7 ~L~ CATA`^f~Q RoR~ Zip Code: ~ y/S s~LEM /'~ Owner's name: ~ASoN Co/~ C~A,,~E~ Phone: J ~y"7~~~' Address: 391> c4/ C~4Tar+IL ~ RAJ Zip Code: :~~/~5,3 ,~LF,~~ %~. - Location of property Tax Map Number: ~s p 2 _ f -- ~ D ` ~r~~C~ J ~ ~y ~,,,~,~, °Y~ ~ "`' '~ Magisterial District: ~'q.T ~~,q OL~ CaTA~~a ~ °" ~ v ~ Community Planning Area: /1~ f~SON C D/ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: OS acres Existing Land Use: R sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C,/ l ~'~yo^ n ~- Proposed Land Use: ~~ `~,L~. For Staff Use Only use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Variance of Section(s) Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v _ ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification %~~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's ag_e~or contract purchaser and am acting wish the knowledge and con ent of the owner. 1 (/ Owner's Signature: f ,~ f(~xr % , i For Staff Use Only: Case Number ~ ~ Applicant / ~ia~~ (.~ 0 dF Cat A~~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. ,Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the be inning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. ; /'led~,Ya.,_ n u~~~/"f " v~ .~U~ ~F~- J .~%n-~,eaaca ~ ~r~2e.~ Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ^~ ~ /J G~` / ~~~~ ~~ .~ Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services a d facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, /~ /~o,,« .~,a-~~ o~.. a~•-ztic`w-~d~ and fire/rescue. ~ ~ parks/recreation ~ ~~ ~;~ , . +..~. 5 ,, , `~ .C" G~/~`Sf GL -~-~c~ 4eMt~ J'~ ',Ll.- CL*-,{t 4- /~,0-~yy~ tr iUti ~, V~ C~ ~GQ.~Mf r~- /t",C. J~C"~ O~ .~G'~-- l~ .G~-i- i. O~'L. ~ (kzGKJ Lb-'L ~ Ji'7~tfi/ O'71.r (/ .. ~' ( l - ~ G ~^~ ~ 'aC'Cv ~~11 r~ ~ _ ~!/1' ~cp' LL- ~°' ~C ~j~'3' °"~, ' ~~t'~'~ .~{ p ~t .~c,. A 1 J ~-~o- -c,r.~+.,~,I rn,- -c'.c,~ vv~t j o / J ~-c~ %,c-".v/ °~ ~~ 1 The following names and signatures represent the bordering neighbors of Mason Cove Chapel. Each of these people have been informed of the plans for an addition to be made to the existing church building. They have with their signatures indicated that they will not protest these expansion plans in any way. ~~- ~t t s J Ruth Elizabeth Deel Otha and Esther Davis 9~='~,~.~ '~'oQ~.~._1i ~. „~-v ~J a2~ •.~ H, t~~, and Margaret Bryant ~- Minnie Sledd ~ ' Gary Bryant ~iu~~/ Gary and Brend Bryant George and~x~ ~?rna ~Z ~~~ ~ Pamela Painter Deel Date a~ ~a.~ R3 ?''!~.-/~~ /99'3 y~ ~~ , t ~ ~~~ / i,. aU ,~-~ y ~ :~ "i Ti~• S[1RJECi f~RUrF.iz[•r IS I+ut Y~11411N TIIE LIA1115 OF TH°_ 11:0 YF:.\R FLOOU &)UN()A.RY AS S~ :U'hN Oti 1NE FEMA FLIK)U 11i1U:dU,;RY PROP£TtTY OF I+11',P. 1fiiS [)ET~RMIM:\rIUN IS RAii'O Cfi lhif: FUX1p QOUNUARY (.~~ (~~ t G. BRYANT M~,I• ACID 11.1.5 IJUT BEEN VERIFIf.U D 8. 1059, PG. 41 S ~ A~:11!AI_ FIGLU EIF.VAiIONS. TAX MAPr 15.02- 1- 1 I ~'~ M Q~o `~ ~ ~~x °~ _ ~~ ~ S.G5~00'pp'E,--,.. I.P.F. 'i C~ x , 4 ~ ` . _ ~~ ~ \ `~r Ca-' s ~ e ~1 N N .rte ~~t' \ ~co I p ` .t1 I ,6 ~ o ~~t. y R ~ ~ N; o c9 N ~ ~' ~ s dma. ~' d ~ ~ ~ Q••~~° ~ ~° ' A . 05 ~ ~~ .~ ~ . ,' DES 1 L°t < .'i • t `. ~: . CO Q` N '_ : ~ . ~ao ~ ~ O~ 3~a. ~~~ ~fi Pa's F~ _ ' ICo3. 138' ~ O.H. W,R6s _ T1V1 16 ~~` W. Al'L pa..• .~ rtoc~e ~ ~ 34 "' r`" `~. °r'a'°~°'°°° ~ X0.37' . .. ~ 3 LRS.' ~'. fJ. ro5.00'00^ W. PT. r- N. 65° 51' S 1 " W. .~ I.PS. ~ 1T cx.D GATAW6A R04D (R-r. 8~"4-) ~_ ~ t>cc~sf L. ArdocJ pRME1A Pai~/TE~ ,REEL ~ dF2Ap5HAW ,v-ax,+ve c. ~~;~°%f ls.o~ - 3 rzoAo /,Q ._ .~ ~~,_ Roth ~~; ZA~~ ''~' 4JO,HN~O., Aa8,0,/TT/ ~:- ~&EL • -• . ZZ . _ ~J /' Ql~~ ~S.nZ 'x-27 D.B. 16L- t~'6 ? `` ~ /' V~C~`nJT. R13. taIG4- Ps. 2zo ti`~~ 1462 -~° TAX MAR ~ 18.02 - 1 - 10 J ~~F~ L A\!n ct14" jlljjj ,T' . ~: SURVEY FOR R~Ma~+~~~;/~ Res, ~T~JST~ES-MASON COVE CHA~'EL OF A 2,052 AGRS T1~ACT 51TUATE OfJ THE fJORTH ~~ SIOG OF pl.p CATAWDA VALLEY ROAD (ST, RT 81+4) v~ 6G~4 IW 'f1-IE CATAW6A MA~ISTCRIAL. DISTftIGT, R`OA1.lOKE CouvTY, V 1 Rr311J I A. No sca ~ r= 8e_oi~ aY: • JOHN D. ABBOTT SC,,~E. -+-'~--~J JOE KO.: ,,_ P, E.~ C. L.S. DATE' JUNE 23 I9eB. PEVISED : ~ ' NEW CASTLE, VIRGINIA :i I ~- ~:- ~:.~, F~ k- . ;. ~G~4LG.; i "- loD ~ O ~~ ~-_ \ ~. N ! ao d~ ~ 4~ 3~a _~~ !~ LO 7~ ~' ~EKN OF Gq~( !r, t gREtlLti4 G. BIZYANT L7 8. 10543, FG, 4 I S TALC MAP`r IS.o2- I- I I >~~ F~ iCo3, B8' Chu; Tflt- SU[1JEC1 1'RU~EItf ~ IS t~• ~~ V~! I I IIN THc Llhil I S Uf 7f !E l::(~ YC:.~.R fL(.~OG E~)Ur~l).~;~'r P.:~ S~ :Uwrl (;tl 'iFiF FEh1A FLitC)f; E',i~U~~!f),=.RY idt,l'. TI•IIS f.:F_lE.f?ht!r'•~aTIC%N IS C1A.=t'0 (:f~ 1f•IF FU)GC) CirJllrtUni;Y },thi' A"dL~ f IAS i;c.)1 BEEN VERIFiFD ~'Y "~~(!AJ. FIf:LI) EI.EVAiIC~NS. ~_ c~ I.P. F. ~ p ~ Q ~ N p O ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ JCS I.P.F. ~ Q ~ 4 O ~ ~ c y . ~~ S. G5 00 Oo E, --,- 197.87' ., ~~ Gp,Q ~1 ~~~~ \ Z S ~~' \ N I ws ~ ~ `°~ ~---~ \ 6_ •w -' CN ~ i~ ~_ W d_ A` O O- U; ~ ~,o~ t~ pPV~p ' 05~ A ~~~.. ~tS~~E 5f "~ Q~`~'~ ~9~ O.N. kI~RFS ~ ' Vim- ICJ, <05 °00'00" W. PT ~- tJ. 65 ° 5 t ' S I " W. ~-" - 0 3 I,Rs. ~ Lps, 1 a ~ o~u c.,s.TAW BA RED (rrr. s ~4) } lrEO,S~ L, Arr/cl.~ P/}Mb~/-~ Pltrr/TE~' .D:-fL ~ 8Rf'.OSMAw M /I•X f NE C. ~r r/c~ ~ S . D ~ ;,.~ .3 FZOAD f7,' fry ,~`~ ~ ~=~ Ru1k £~;~~~E~ D.B. 19L+- P6. Z2? D.B. IG4- PG. 2z0 TAl( -r4AP~- lg~ 02 - 1 - 10 =~ ~Y' . ; No. , , ~-• `'= ` % 146? ' ''e.~: j J `\.. Fr, . ~. cv~1Y FEEL ~\`' ~~ 3° (/~, .- s-'' 5~ /°,ss;d~E Lo.vy Nod S~Q1£ 1 ~~= ao~ ~, - , v,a 31t ~J Tso ~ T ~ ~ ~._-- I 3i U ~, 311 7 -- 890 \ 86a 62 B 4 12 ~~~ 620 T 740 0~ 620 61 ~ a g yes ~~(!~ 7 O 311 (Q ~ 6ze 6 `PtP~ 622 6 e /'~ - • -- VICINITY MAPJ ' 311 ~ - n7 - -~ J _ - ~ ~• ~.~ Q NORTH _ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PETITIONER: MASON COVE CHAPEL AND ZONING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 15.02-1-10 ~_ •. REQUEST: SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND CHURCH ~~,~ ~'"' f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRUSTEES OF THE MASON COVE CHAPEL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING LOCATED AT 3917 OLD CATAWBA ROAD (TAX PARCEL 15.02-1-10) CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Trustees of Mason Cove Chapel have filed a petition to allow the expansion of an existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 6, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 22, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 27, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of an existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Trustees of the Mason Cove Chapel to allow the expansion of an 1 ~-i existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\mason.mv ~µ~ ""~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, JIILY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE 72793-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.410 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED WEST OF 6707/6705 WOOD HAVEN ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 26.20-4-33) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTHA W. CO8 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 22, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 27, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 6, 1993; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.410 acre, as described herein, and located west of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road (Tax Map Number 26.20-4-33) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Martha W. cox. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Va. Sec. Hwy. #628 (Woodhaven Road), said point being the southeasterly corner of the property of D. S. Stephenson; thence leaving Va. Sec. Hwy. #628, and with the southeasterly line of D. S. Stephenson, N. 25 deg. 40' 05" E. 245.00 feet to a point; thence S. 68 deg. 31' 20" E. 75.20 feet to a point; thence with a new division line through the property of the grantor herein, S. 25 deg. 40' 05" W. 250.49 feet to a point on Va. Sec. Hwy. #628; thence with said Va. Sec. Hwy. #628, N. 64 deg. 19' S5" W. 750.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and being 0.427 acre, as shown on plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, dated May 18, 1979; and Less and except that 0.017 acre tract dedicated for street widening purposes as set out in deed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1123, page 588. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~~ ~t ~~ Y ~jC.-a~. N NORTH tis S- Welt nor rrir 79 1•' inr~ ran.:)" \ ~~ 1 ~_~ 'err '•' 'I TI011 ~ ~ ~~ )!» :j ! ` ra.I r RI ,i/rJ 62 J ",/~/`'~~i. '~. •^ / ~ ~ »•. ~~° , f rnr rou .net ru! 1 ~ ~ 9 / T6 ~: 'r 66 i ... ~ ~~ ~y~~ ~,ei ron y ~ - S 6 '. 7 - ! •rw tti nJr' ~ ~ t yrnr b7 0 ,. °.~ `~ 2J ,• r s ~CS,,?l.•/ • / s..I TJ I• '69 .• e' ~. 22 • !T 12 ~ 4 72 71 ~ ro ~'(;:rf\_~•'~(/ le• \- • 'r ' ' Sara ~ ~ 21 ' / ~ ~ \ rre~ rtes arr nr• \ /" \ ~ 70 •~: \ .: g .~ ~. / ~,•~ ~ by F l,. • ,-~ > ~2 \1 r•! /. \` w\/ ,j / 3 / ~&k Pa / / / / '/ / / / . ~..,, 17 ~ ,' is zrl ~ / .. o / C /` /•/ oa/ F° ,.,. / f.,; \, 1 ~ ~""~~_ - 7 r F FT •y ;. ,_ nn PETITIONER MARTHA W. COX DEPARTI~.N'r OF PLANNING TAX MAP NUMBER(S): REZONWG from R-1 to R-2 AND ZONING REQUEST: v' _ • 9 9 rr• ~ ? ' 6 ~ 6 ~ ` I ~ • rut I 1 ti ...!„r R:c] ~ !.• g ~ •, j% .~ k; ~rui Tl % ~3 u $1 y .~r,J lJ~+ PETITIONER: MARTHA COX CASE NUMBER: 18-7/93 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 6, 1993 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 27, 1993 A. REQUEST Petition of Martha W. Cox to rezone 0.410 acres from R-1 to R-2 to construct a duplex, located west of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Doug Wills stated that he is opposed to the request because it will devalue his property. He said that Wood Haven is a fairly dangerous road in this area. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the previous zoning of the property. Staff responded that it was formerly zoned R-3 (prior to the 1992 comprehensive rezoning in the County). D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Massey said that he does not view this request as a major impact on the land use in this area. He moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE' None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan -Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance rringt ,Secretary Roano County Tanning Commission CA-a STAFF REPORT PART I A. E)CECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of Martha Cox to rezone a 0.41 acre tract from R-1 to R-2 in order to build a duplex. The site is located approximately .15 mile west of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Wood Haven Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Two family dwellings are allowed by right in the AV, R-2, R-3, R-4, and C-1 zoning districts. In all cases, duplexes are subject to use and design standards, although the standards differ from district to district. In R-2, the proposed duplex lot must contain a minimum of 10,000 square feet. A VDOT entrance permit is required before issuance of a building permit. - :. orted:::..R.:.~..:~tvtitcl~ eri~its uF.::::::.;:'>:::;:.:~:.:::>:::.:;::.;:.::;:>;::<:>:;~:>;~~<:;::;~!<>::;>.~~...:;.:.::<: ~ha::>:su.,b e~~.::;~t~~;:<was::.;~ .::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::::.;;:.;:.;.:.::::::::::::::<::::::.;:::::::::::..:::::.:::.::::,.::.::::.::::.::::...._..:.:..:.......:............ . w~~1 2 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDfTIONS Location: The petitioner's site is situated on the north side of Wood Haven Road west of its intersection with Peters Creek Road near the entrance to the Woodlands Subdivision. The site is in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation: The subject property is undeveloped and partially wooded with a variety of deciduous species. That portion to be developed is flat while the rear one-third slopes moderately downhill. Surrounding Neighborhood: The petitioner's property and adjacent tracts to the north and west are zoned R-1. To the east and south across Wood Haven Road, R-2 zoning is in place. Existing dwellings, one duplex and one single family residence adjoin the subject site on the east and west respectively. To the north stands afour-unit apartment house built when the area adjoining Wood Haven Road on the north was zoned R-3. Single family homes exist south across Wood Haven. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture: Petitioner proposes to construct atwo-story building containing a total of approximately 2,400 sq.ft. The structure's exterior would include brick and cedar siding; approximate proposed height is 20 feet. Access: VDOT entrance permit is required. One common or two separate driveways could be constructed from Wood Haven Road. Sight distance is adequate and fire and rescue capability is within the established service standard with a travel time not exceeding four minutes. Traffic Generation: No significant impact anticipated on Wood Haven Road. Each duplex unit may generate up to 10 trips per day. 1990 ADT on this segment of Wood Haven was 2,481 vehicles. Amenities: Two parking spaces are required per dwelling unit. Although not indicated on petitioner's plot plan, sufficient area exists to meet or exceed ordinance requirements. Utilities: Owner will be required to connect to either public water or sewer (due to lot size), and has made application for same. 3 C. CONFORMANCE WfTF-I COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN Subject site is designated Neighborhood Conservation by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This designation limits middle density residential development (3-6 units per acre) in Neighborhood Conservation areas. Two family residential development is not mentioned specifically by Neighborhood Conservation policies, although the very similar single family attached land use type is considered desirable when developed "at a density not markedly higher than the status quo." The proposal does encourage the infill of vacant lots in residential neighborhoods. D. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The petitioner's request complies with the zoning ordinance and accompanying standards. Duplex development is already established along the eastern corridor of Wood Haven Road and no detrimental impacts are anticipated. Site plan review will not be required. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petitioner's request to construct one duplex is generally consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Any impacts on neighboring properties in terms of land use or traffic should be minimal. Staff recommends no proffers. PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: JULY 6, 1993 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use Proposed Zoning: R-2 For Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: Erect multi-farm ly unit (one duplex two -farm ly Use Type: unit) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: ~~`~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ass v Ris v _ ws v x Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan x Application fee Application -... Metes and bounds description ~ :.~, Proffers, if applicable x Justification '~/: Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowle ge and consent the o er. Owner's Signature: ~~VV~ - ----------- __ - I'c>l Jlell Vor vlu~. ..aa~ rwr~u•c. Applicant nnaRn~~ w. aox tJi,~' The Planning Commission will stucy rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Flease answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The application complies with all the stated purposes of Section 30-3 of the Roanoke j County Zoning Ordinance which are applicable to this particular property. The property; was zoned Residential R-3 prior to the comprehensive rezoning of Roanoke County which took affect on December 31, 1992. Asa result of such conprehensive rezoning, the property was down-coned to Resider,tiai it-1. However, the propert}•-is-directly adjacent to land currently zoned Residential R-Z and is in an area where there is substantial._ duplex residential development. ~ Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The use of this property for duplex purposes is consistent with the neighborhood conservation designation of the Roanoke County CgYprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(sl of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including v~ater/sewer, roads, schools, Darks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Rezoning will permit the orderly development of the property itself and will have no adverse impact upon adjoining or surrounding properties or on public services or utilities, including water, sewer, roads, schools, parks, recreation, fire or rescue. LAW OFFICES ' OSTERHOLIDT, FERGLISON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. iIC HAEL 5. FERGUSON P. O. BOX 20068 .D WARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA G. STEVEN AGEE 24018 MARK D. KIDD ELLEN KUO May 19, 1993 Terrance Harrington Director of Planning County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Terry: ~,,~„- ~, TELEPHONE 703-774-1197 FAX NO. 703-774-0961 Enclosed you will find a check in the amount of $685.00 covering the application fee for the enclosed Rezoning Application, which is filed on behalf of Martha W. Cox with respect to Parcel No. 26.2004-33 according to the Roanoke County Tax Maps. I have signed this Application on behalf of the owner. I have also enclosed an Application for Water or Sewer Service. This will be a single duplex unit to be constructed along the north side of Woodhaven Road. This property was rezoned Residential R-3 immediately prior to the most recent comprehensive Roanoke County rezoning which took affect December 31, 1992. This property is presently zoned Resident R-1. It is directly adjacent to Tax Map No. 26.20-04-32 which is presently zoned Residential R-2. Considerable other property lying along Wood Haven Road between the location of the subject parcel and Peters Creek Road is already zoned Residential R-2. It is the property owner's intention to construct one single residential duplex (two family dwelling) upon the property in question. The design for such duplex will be similar to that of other properties already in the area. Should you need anything further, please let me know. I look forward to hearing from you with respect to the processing of this application and the scheduling of the matter for hearing. CHO/mb Enclosures Very truly yours, N_ OTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ZONE "c`" AS SHOWN ON THE FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS BASED ON SAID MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. NEW LOT 2B PROPERTY OF ANTHONY EDMOND & SUSAN ARMISTEAD BROWN TAX # 26.20-04-57 '1.. OLD PIN PROPERTY OF BOBBY L. & SUSAN P. DOBYNS TAX # 26.20-04-34 BUILDING PERMIT PLOT PLAN FOR MARTHA W. COX OF 0.410 ACRE TRACT SITUATE ON WOODHAVEN ROAD, N.W. VA. SEC. RTE. #628 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA TAX # 26.20-04-33 T, p, pig do SON N.8 G-112 DRAWN LRO TPP&5 ea.a so,~..>ua gNOiNEERS PO~C OtlStH Hot 99 CALL. CHK'D JD pL~,NNERS 9a]am. Virdaia ?.L1I59 ~, ncrn. LRn w 0 0 ~N Z OLD PIN S 68 3120" E 75.20 0.410 AC. 3 a> o ~' o O ~ N ~ ~N PROPOSED z DUPLEX J CU .2 .2 °o W 10.8 0.8 I 0 = N ~ ~7 17.5' in '~ N N s>=c. e 7HE WOODLANDS CROSS 71MBER TRAIL Q~ LOCATION MAP PROPERTY OF JAMIE D. COX TAX # 26.20-04-32 ~.'._ T 30' M.B. OLD b o PIN _ ~ 289.41 FROM THE LINE OF 75.00 15' P•~•E LOT 1, JAMES BUSHONG SUBD. .r..- N 64'19'55' W WOODHAVEN ROAD 50' R/W VA. SEC. RTE. # 628 40' R/W -o m ~~~ ~ O, '° ~2 ~ O ~~ ~ ~~Zg.OF D~,r l v JOHN T. PARKER > No. 1 o7s o L////`~ ~~ SCALE: 1^= 4V DATE: FEB. 11 ,1993 p_ 41637 yy_n_, 93-0168 ~~ vrc~urrY ~,~~ MAP NORTH yr ~ - ~/ 2 / ~ ~/ ~~^/ 66c>< '-\\ ~~1 \` 'A r nor I / \ ~`~`~~ \~~ Sr v, - nor r ., re.r ~ Y n~ ~ B9 '~ a 2 ndx ° Mi4 63 _` 11 ry . ,Loll -~ _, ~, rnr TB • ~'~ ~' a r6n ..Rr '~i 62 ~/r•~~' \ ~.•. at: c: . 1'3O nm^ c° tort soo . net / rr 66 ~ - nr. ~ y.? . p . rur _~ 76 /.~ \J~ /~~y \\ ..~if 4 S 6 B no . '4. .r rur' •.t n•r 67n .. ••:` - L_ d 3 E - 7 9 ,% nn `d ' j75 ~iT ~~'~r rroa i ~\ \'\• •\ a r~ ~ 10 ..Il nrs ~ / r..r / % ~ - ,~\„- y~ ,_~{~7t rv• _~'_- ' r \L23, '•ra J ` ', .,J?~ ~ :2 ruf a\ rr.r .7 T3 72 71 rod.. 69\ ~ tilt ~ s: /•~ \~~. 71 i• I ~ ° .';, `an, `22 -' rt1~•v / ~` h, r irr~ ~t• ,'~/` Jar \; .~:: , 8 ( 7 e.21 20 , rra{/• tier rr+f rrro` ~.! \ 70 9 ` ! 6 \ ,• rnr -urr Bff/ r~ I ,' n.~ \ ••,\~~. ' ,.r ~ •~ ~\ »or S~(. \,!\\ -\ YI ~ f 6r r ru\>\' ,a . ~ 18 I N T CrnaurmEfn ~~ / ~ rnr \~.. ~ ~ `c• rr.r ~1 r r4s~ ruf rse> . t ~. 47 t rrro atimn \•' ,,an.r ~ ~ ~ IS ~ .eTr~. ~.. -+ ~4~ ~ i 67 68 ~' ~ ~\ p ~ n Rr.ronJ RccJ 1~ / ' o e Rn~~C\: / ~2 49rr wJOa ~ ..~ .r ux rr:f ~ I ~ _' ~t ~r ~ f •~ .v\ ~> 11 ~ I. rr.r a~ ... ~ ,. SO ? Lc ~ - ~~ rraf -Ln.t •~ g a 6e _ ;i' FCSS ~% 2 rr.a 23» •~ 24 rrr. , 42~\'1 .. 51 ~nr ~ oN ~ a 1 0 'nre "~ ,I / ..-.7 ~ C! `~' a • 6 \ ~. / :S r• 41 -% ~ ~~. rrJO rr .2 7r' rtrr, .~rlN 63rr 12 rr.0 \`JI ~ \Y \ W 'I an i 39a /~> ` rr~ f ~~ .•Rr .+33~ rO ~ r•, ! \ % rui ~ ~~ ' `ta` •\y t rrrr ~ 38 OI :. 'tar .• a. / \\\~~~iii C 4 5 rrn c . ~ 13 ~ ~ r. ~ 21 ~.' \ ~ ''w •~ 37 v `~i,7rr• .. .+ .i ~ 62 v. •nu,", r'u' • .' rni y \ Utec ,• •. `° -j rur ` \~ %- / 2C ' urr ~' '~ ~ J 63 ~ ,o rrr! , r' 36.2 / ro \ ~" 36 a r ~ /1 -• ~ rirt ~ ~~• pa \ uL 3s L/ .6 ~ 37 / oor rnr 32 _ ~ 29 /' 17 ' % • '/ trot 31 \ a Sus: , / / \~~~CCC/// rnr ~ \ ~~ eroa rro. ~ 30 / d_ +s ~ / \ ruf /+ 29 ~~~ • / ~ °jr 4 Rr P ~ rn! ~ ri / ~ i \ 6 ruf / ` /~ ``\ ' / `\ i f` 29 ?s 2J / i / ~ ~ \ ~ Ida>C• 9~ ~ rife 2 YfJ ~, ~ ?~ ~ , / .. ~ y.o a..19 ~ 7 l `, I ~ ~ . _ 9' .~r1 .».. t ,/ 31 'n 2 b' uex ? r 22' xn i' .L~ /'. ~i.. •$I` Wr ~ SIJI\\ II \\.r . _.)'`+ _Lr' 'l.el ~~~ ' u 12 2U lJ,I \~ xl1 \ ~ ... s \ 11'~ \ / 1 aJa Iva\µ~'\n 6 ,+ 4 - 4" DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIl~'G PETITIONER MARTHA W. COX ?~ TAX MAP NUMBER(S): 26.20-433 AND ZONING REQUEST: REZONING from R-1 to R-2 _ - r rnl (.~ "' O~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.410 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED WEST OF 6707/6705 WOOD HAVEN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 26.20-4-33) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTHA W. CO% WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 22, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 27, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 6, 1993; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.410 acre, as described herein, and located west of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road (Tax Map Number 26.20-4-33) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Martha W. Cox. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Va. Sec. Hwy. #628 (Woodhaven Road), said point being the southeasterly corner of the property of D. S. Stephenson; thence leaving Va. Sec. Hwy. #628, and with the southeasterly line of D. S. Stephenson, N. 25 deg. 40' 05" ~' G''~ E. 245.00 feet to a point; thence S. 68 deg. 31' 20" E. 75.20 feet to a point; thence with a new division line through the property of the grantor herein, S. 25 deg. 40' 05" W. 250.49 feet to a point on Va. Sec. Hwy. #628; thence with said Va. Sec. Hwy. #628, N. 64 deg. 19' 55" W. 750.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING, and being 0.427 acre, as shown on plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, dated May 18, 1979; and Less and except that 0.017 acre tract dedicated for street widening purposes as set out in deed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1123, page 588. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. c:\wp5]\agenda\zoning\rnx ~Illlllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllil~ _ - _ .. - ~ ~. ~.. ~ ~ 111 C ~ ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. L.~ - o~ _ - _ - - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS c _ SUBJECT: ,' ~ _ __ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: -_ ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe c speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _ __ __ ~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 ACTION NO. ~~" ITEM NO. Y "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Hold First Reading of Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County, by the Adoption of Certain Miscellaneous Changes Throughout the County to Said Maps (Bonsack, Cotton Hill, Poage Valley Road) and Set Date for Second Reading and Public Hearing COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The staff will present to the Board a report from the Parkway Committee at the meeting. This -s atlll be-ng finalized for approval of the partlc-pants. !recommend approval of the first reading w/th the understanding that it may be necessary to do additional work to reach a consensus. BACKGROUND' In December 1992, as part of the comprehensive rezoning of Roanoke County, the Board zoned four large areas in proximity to the Blue Ridge Parkway AG-1. In January a committee was formed to study these areas and identify viewsheds that are critical to the integrity of the Parkway. One of the objectives of the Blue Ridge Parkway Committee in identifying critical viewsheds was to also identify those properties that are not critical viewsheds. The ordinance before you is to rezone those properties, that the Blue Ridge Parkway Committee has determined are not critical viewsheds, from AG-1 to either R-1 or AR. See the attached maps. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Planning Commission recommended, on July 6, 1993, that these properties be rezoned from AG-1 to either R-1 or AR. Some of the factors that went into this decision were the location of properties and their proximity to other subdivision activity, demand for housing, recent and planned road improvements, and either the existence or the probability of future public water and sewer service to these areas. Many of the issues that have emerged are specific to the Cotton Hill area because the proposed rezonings have generated the most interest in that area. These issues are as follows: 1) Cotton Hill Road traffic concerns; 2) overcrowded schools; 3) protection of the Blue Ridge Parkway; and 4) concerns with high density residential development. Staff comments are provided below on each of these items. ^ " I 1. Cotton Hill Road is a substandard secondary road, as are most of the secondary roads in Roanoke County. It is narrow, in places steep and is currently above capacity. Development off of Cotton Hill Road will increase traffic by approximately 10 vehicle trip ends per day per house. Some of this traffic could be diverted to Merriman Road if a through road is built through the proposed subdivision. There are no current plans to upgrade Cotton Hill Road, i.e., it is not on the County's 6-year plan. The recommendation of the Planning Commission would minimize the number of driveways coming directly off Cotton Hill Road by zoning these properties AR. This zoning district requires more road frontage than R-1. 2. The school issue is a complicated one. While schools in certain areas of the County may be overcrowded, the school system in general has excess capacity. As you know, there are current plans for a new high school in southwest County. 3. The Blue Ridge Parkway viewshed issue has been studied for seven months. The Committee has made their recommendations on the eleven critical viewshed areas in the County. The Blue Ridge Parkway Committee has determined that the properties involved in the ordinance before you are not critical to the Parkway viewsheds. 4. The Roanoke County 1985 Comprehensive Plan contains guidelines on recommended densities for each Land Use Plan designation. While some of the land use designations for these four areas have recommended densities lower than those allowed by the proposed zoning districts other factors need to be taken into consideration. The 1985 Comprehensive Plan does not reflect the rapid residential development in the last 5 years in the southwest corridor nor does it reflect recent or planned road improvements. In addition, the construction of the Spring Hollow water line through the area and the strong potential for the private sector construction of a public sewer are not considerations reflected in the currently adopted plan. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative No. 1: Hold first reading of this ordinance and set date for second reading and public hearing. Alternative No. 2: Do not hold first reading of this ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: Alternative No. 1 V+' Respectfully submitted, Ja et Scheid Department of Planning and Zoning Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs v-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1993 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY TO SAID MAPS (BONSACK, COTTON HILL, POAGES VALLEY ROAD) WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on June 1, 1993 and July 6, 1993, and have made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993 and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 24, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 v-i 1. That "1992 Zoning District Maps. of Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (A) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to R-1, Low Density Residential District: 40.02-1-4; 40.02-1-5; 40.02-1-6; 40.02-1-7; 40.02-1-8; 40.04-1-3; 40.04-1-4; 40.04-1-5; 40.04-1-6; 40.04-1-7; 40.04-1-8; 40.04-1-9; 40.04-1-10; 40.04-1-40; 40.04-1-41; portion of 40.04-1-42; 40.04-1-45; 40.04-1-46; 40.04-1-47; 40.04-1-48; 40.04-1-48.1; 40.04-1-49; 40.04-1-50; 40.04-1-51; 40.04-1-52; 40.04-1-53; 40.04-1-54; 40.04-1-55; 40.04-1-56; 40.04-1-57; 40.04-1-58; 50.01-1-16.3; 50.01-1-17; 50.01-1-18; 50.01-1-19; 50.01-1-19.1; portion of 50.02-1-1; 86.15-2-2; 86.16-5-58; 86.19-1-1; 86.19-1-5; 86.19-1-8; 86.19-1-11; 86.19-1-14; 86.19-1-17; 86.19-1-20; 86.19-1-23; 86.19-1-26; 86.19-1-29; 86.19-1-29.3; 86.19-1-32; portion of 86.19-2-9; 86.19-2-33; 86.20-3-1; 86.20-3-5; portion of 50.02-1-1.2; 86.15-2-3; 86.19-1-1.1; 86.19-1-2; 86.19-1-6; 86.19-1-7; 86.19-1-9; 86.19-1-10; 86.19-1-12; 86.19-1-13; 86.19-1-15; 86.19-1-16; 86.19-1-18; 86.19-1-19; 86.19-1-21; 86.19-1-22; 86.19-1-24; 86.19-1-25; 86.19-1-27; 86.19-1-28; 86.19-1-29.1; 86.19-1-29.2; 86.19-1-30; 86.19-1-31; 86.19-1-32.1; 86.19-1-33; 86.19-2-31; portion of 86.19-2-32; 86.19-2-33.1; 86.19-2-33.2; 86.20-3-3; 86.20-3-4; 86.20-3-6; 86.20-3-7; 2 v-i 86.20-3-8; 86.20-3-9; 86.20-3-10; 86.20-3-11; 86.20-3-12; 86.20-3-13; 86.20-3-14; 86.20-3-15; 86.20-3-16; 86.20-3-17; 86.20-3-18; 86.20-3-19; 86.20-3-20; 86.20-3-21; 86.20-3-21.1; 86.20-3-22; 86.20-3-23; 86.20-3-24; 95.02-2-44; 95.02-2-45; 95.02-2-46; 95.02-2-47; 95.02-2-48; 95.02-2-48.1; 95.02-2-49; 95.02-2-51; 95.02-2-53; 95.02-2-54; 95.02-2-55; 95.02-2-56; 95.02-2-57; 95.02-2-58; 95.02-2-60; 95.02-2-60.1; 95.02-2-60.2; 95.02-2-60.3; 95.02-2-60.4; 95.02-2-61; 95.02-2-61.1; 95.02-2-61.2; 95.02-2-62; 95.02-2-63; 95.04-1-6; 95.04-1-7; 95.04-1-8.1; 95.04-1-8.2; portion of 95.04-1-12; 95.04-1-14; 95.04-1-16; portion of 95.04-1-17; 95.04-1-18; 95.04- 1-19; 95.04-1-20; 95.04-1-21; 95.04-1-22; 95.04-1-23; 95.04-1-24; 95.04-1-25; 95.04-1-26; 95.04-3-1; 95.04-3-2; 95.04-3-3; 95.04-3-4; 95.04-3-5; 96.01-2-1; 96.01-2-2; 96.01-2-3; 96.01-2-4; 96.01-2-5; 96.01-2-6; 96.01-2-6.1; 96.01-2-6.2; 96.01-2-7; 96.01-2-8; 96.01-2-9; 96.01-2-10; 96.01-2-11; 96.01-2-13; 96.01-2-14; 96.01-2-15; 96.01-2-16; 96.01-2-17; 96.01-2-18; 96.01-2-19; 96.01-2-19.1; 96.01-2-19.2; 96.01-2-20; 96.01-2-21; 96.01-2-21.1; 96.01-2-21.2; 96.01-2-22; 96.01-2-23; 96.01-2-24; 96.01-2-25; 96.01-2-26; 96.01-2-27; 96.01-2-28; 96.01-2-29; 96.01-2-30; 96.01-2-31; 96.01-2-32; 96.01-2-33; 96.01-2-34; 96.01-2-35; 96.01-2-36; 96.01-2-37; 96.01-2-38; 96.01-2-39; 96.01-2-40; 96.01-2-41; 96.01-2-42; 96.01-2-43; 96.01-2-44; 96.01-2-45; 96.01-2-46; 96.01-3-1; 96.01-3-2; 96.01-3-2.1; 96.01-3-3; 96.01-3-4; 96.01-3-5; 96.01-3-6; 96.01-3-7; 96.01-3-8; 96.01-3-9; 96.01-3-10; 96.01-3-11; 96.01-3-12; 96.01-3-13; portion of 96.01-3-37; 96.02-1-1; 96.02-1-2; 96.02-1-3; 96.02-1-4; 96.02-1-5; 96.02-1-6; 3 V-I 96.02-1-30; 96.02-1-33; 96.02-1-36; 96.02-1-39; 96.02-1-43; portion of 96.02-1-46; 96.02-1-46.2; 96.03-2-1; 96.03-2-4; 96.03-2-7; 96.03-2-10; 96.03-2-12.2; 96.03-2-20; 96.03-2-23; 96.03-2-26; 96.03-2-28.1; 96.04-1-1; 96.04-1-4; 96.04-1-7; 96.04-1-36.1; 96.07-1-1; 96.07-1-5; 96.08-1-1; 96.08-1-4; 96.08-2-3; 97.01-2-1; 97.01-2-4; 97.01-2-7; 97.01-2-14; 97.01-2-17; portion of 97.03-2-1; 97.03-2-4; 97.03-2-7; 97.03-2-10; 97.03-2-13; 97.03-1-34; (B) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to A-R, 96.02-1-31; 96.02-1-32; 96.02-1-34; 96.02-1-35; 96.02-1-37; 96.02-1-38; 96.02-1-41; 96.02-1-42; 96.02-1-44; 96.02-1-45; portion of 96.02-1-46.1; 96.02-1-46.3; 96.03-2-2; 96.03-2-5; 96.03-2-8; 96.03-2-11; 96.03-2-12.3; 96.03-2-21; 96.03-2-24; 96.03-2-27; 96.03-2-29; 96.04-1-2; 96.04-1-5; 96.04-1-35.1; 96.04-1-37; 96.07-1-2; 96.07-1-6; 96.08-1-2; 96.08-2-1; 96.08-2-4; 97.01-2-2; 97.01-2-5; 97.01-2-8; 97.01-2-15; 97.03-1-36 97.03-2-2; 97.03-2-5; 97.03-2-8; 97.03-2-11; 97.03-2-14; 96.03-2-3; 96.03-2-6; 96.03-2-9; 96.03-2-12.1; 96.03-2-19; 96.03-2-22; 96.03-2-25; 96.03-2-28; 96.03-2-30; 96.04-1-3; 96.04-1-6; 96.04-1-36; 96.07-1-4; 96.08-1-3; 96.08-2-2; 96.08-2-6; 97.01-2-3; 97.01-2-6; 97.01-2-9; 97.01-2-16; 97.03-2-3; 97.03-2-6; 97.03-2-9; 97.03-2-12; 97.03-2-15; Agriculture/Residential District: 96.01-1-1; 96.01-1-2; 96.01-1-3; 4 V- 96.01-1-4.1; 96.02-1-7; 96.02-1-10; 96.02-1-13; 96.02-1-17; 96.02-1-20; 96.02-1-24; 96.02-1-27; portion of 96.03-1-2; portion of 96.03-1-10; 96.03-1-13; 96.03-1-16; 96.03-3-3; 96.03-3-6; 96.03-3-9; 96.03-3-12; 96.03-3-15; 96.03-3-18; 96.03-3-21; 96.02-1-46; 96.03-1-7; 96.04-1-8; 96.04-1-13; 96.04-1-16; 96.04-1-19; 96.04-1-22; 96.04-1-25; 96.04-1-28; 96.04-1-31; 96.04-1-34; 96.04-1-39; 96.04-3-1.1; 96.04-3-1.5; 96.04-3-1.8; 96.04-3-1.11; 96.04-3-1.14; 96.04-3-1.17; 96.04-3-1.20; 96.04-3-2; 96.04-3-5; 96.04-4-1; 96.04-4-4; 96.04-4-7; 96.04-4-10; 96.04-4-13; 96.04-4-16; 96.04-4-19; 96.04- 4-22; 96.01-1-5; 96.02-1-8; 96.02-1-11; 96.02-1-14; 96.02-1-18; 96.02-1-21; 96.02-1-25; 96.02-1-28; 96.03-1-4; 96.03-1-8; 96.03-1-11; 96.03-1-14; 96.03-3-1; 96.03-3-4; 96.03-3-7; 96.03-3-10; 96.03-3-13; 96.03-3-16; 96.03-3-19; 96.04-1-10; 96.04-1-14; 96.04-1-17; 96.04-1-20; 96.04-1-23; 96.04-1-26; 96.04-1-29; 96.04-1-32; 96.04-1-35; 96.04-2-3; 96.04-3-1.3; 96.04-3-1.6; 96.04-3-1.9; 96.04-3-1.12; 96.04-3-1.15; 96.04-3-1.18; 96.04-3-1.21; 96.04-3-3; 96.04-3-6; 96.04-4-2; 96.04-4-5; 96.04-4-8; 96.04-4-11; 96.04-4-14; 96.04-4-17; 96.04-4-20; 96.01-1-6; 96.02-1-9; 96.02-1-12; 96.02-1-15; 96.02-1-19; 96.02-1-23; 96.02-1-26; 96.02-1-29; 96.03-1-5; 96.03-1-9; 96.03-1-11.1; 96.03-1-15; 96.03-3-2; 96.03-3-5; 96.03-3-8; 96.03-3-11; 96.03-3-14; 96.03-3-17; 96.03-3-20; 96.04-1-12; 96.04-1-15; 96.04-1-18; 96.04-1-21; 96.04-1-24; 96.04-1-27; 96.04-1-30; 96.04-1-33; 96.04-1-38; 96.04-2-4; 96.04-3-1.4; 96.04-3-1.7; 96.04-3-1.10; 96.04-3-1.13; 96.04-3-1.16; 96.04-3-1.19; 96.04-3-1.22; 96.04-3-4; 96.04-3-7; 96.04-4-3; 96.04-4-6; 96.04-4-9; 96.04-4-12; 96.04-4-15; 96.04-4-18; 96.04-4-21; 5 V-I 97.03-1-25; 97.03-1-26; 97.03-1-28; 97.03-1-29; 97.03-1-31; 97.03-1-32; portion of 97.03-1-34; 97.03-1-37; 97.03-1-38; 97.03-2-16; 97.03-2-17; 97.03-2-19; 97.03-2-20; 97.03-2-21; 97.03-2-22; 97.03-2-24; 97.03-2-25; 97.03-2-27; 97.03-2-28; 97.03-2-30 97.03-1-27; 97.03-1-30; 97.03-1-33; portion of 97.03-1-36; portion of 97.03-2-12; 97.03-2-18; 97.03-2-20.1; 97.03-2-23; 97.03-2-26; 97.03-2-29; 2. That said map or maps entitled "ZONING CHANGES BONSACK" and "ZONING CHANGES COTTON HILL AND POAGES VALLEY ROAD" (dated July 21, 1993) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. c:\wp51\agenda\code\zone.2nd 6 ~'~~'' V-I G CHANGES NSACK DESIGNATIONS SIDENTIAL rp.rea ey a,e Rw„oke ca, n~e~DCiC-pa ~c DA rE: 47/20/93 ~iiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ ~_ = AGENDA ITEM NO. c _ - _ - - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ __ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ._ = SUBJECT: ~~c ~r ~:n;~~ w ~:r ~.~_~ !~ ; r ti~ s, ~ ~. ~~~~~ ~` I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. - c -_ ~~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - i ~ - _ ~ = __ ~ ~ ~ 11~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiititiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~it? ~iiiui~iii~iiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiieiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiii~~~~ ~ _ ~ - - - - _ _ - - - - _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ c __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~- `- ~~'~~' c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. . __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t1'1'1 -~. 7/27/93 CHAIRMAN MINNIX IN RE; AGENDA ITEM V-1 Marie Ziegler, 6163 Cotton Hill Road, telephoned. She cannot be at meeting tonight. Wants to go on record as opposing the rezoning of the property. ~IIIIIIIIIII~'~""'I"I"I"'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'II'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ '4. ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~ c AGENDA ITEM NO. 1/- _ APPE CE REQUEST _ __ - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE +~CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ SUBJECT: Dir~~c~ ~-i~.-a~~~u c~-~~~r~ ~,~~ ~rs~~~~- ~~S ~~ o~~~ ~uN~y = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comme t whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ 1~Iillllllllllillillllllllllllllllilillllllilllillilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllililllllllllillillillllllllllllillllllllim ~iiiiu~iii~~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ _ _ _ _ __ _ - ~. - AGENDA ITEM NO. " ~ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c -_ SUBJECT: ~o,v~u c ~T ~4- ~ E,L-~ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me durin the g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five utes to c p g . min omment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ w ~ it ~ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~111 ~Illllllllllillllllllllllilllllllil~~iill~lllllllilillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllll~ ~. _ _ _ _ - - __ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - - - - - - - - - - - = APPE CE REQUEST = _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ - - - __ SUBJECT: __ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of u S pervisors to recognize me during the - meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. -_ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GRDUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - = - - = mllllilillillllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllilllilllllillllllllllillllililllllllllim ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllilillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllll~ ~~_ _ _ _ _ __ _ - `/ - AGENDA ITEM NO. Y - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST =_ __ PUBLIC E[]EARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ -_ - - SUBJECT: ~o~i~ =~c-~~`d~i~6~~flP~w~~ ~~--1~~J~t~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of u S pervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment d hethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - ecide the tam lim t based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view. only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = = = ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - mllllllilllliillilllllillllliiliillllilllliill Iilililillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllililltlim ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _~ _ _ - _~ _ _ __ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - __ APPE CE REQUEST -_ PUBLIC HEARING ~ ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - -_ c SUBJECT: ~ „ `'`.'1 ~=~t, ~ . - __ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to c whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to _ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - - = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vhth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ .PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - = _ - 11~IIIillllllilllilllllilllllllllilllililllill 11 llllilllllllllllilllilllllllllllllllillllllllllilllillilllllllllllllllilllllillilllm ~Illlllllllillllllllllllllllllllliilllllllllilllllillllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllll~ _ _ - - _ _ __ ~_ - -® AGENDA ITEM NO. c - - APPE CE RE VEST - Q - ~/ z/ ~~ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - sUBJECT: ~-~- ~~~ - -_ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c - p g• - - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to = do otherwise. . __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. _ - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - - _ - - = mllllllllllllilllllllliilllllllilllilllilllill Illilllllllilllllillllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllllllii~ ~JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~- - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - -_ -_ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING X ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - _ - - - - = SUBJECT: _~, /- .~c~nr~~rv /l~A!! % - - - ~ _ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ -_ ~, - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - vnth the clerk. - __ __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ - - mllllilllllllllllillllllilllllllllilllllllllillllilillllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllliilillllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllm ~IIIIII111iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111j1J ___ __ _ _ _ _ I~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ' ~ c __ APPE CE RE VEST - Q - PUBLIC HEARING yORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ _ SUBJECT: ~ o ~ ~, ~--~ ~r` s fi ~- ~` ~ fi ~~r h s -- ~~~ `~ ~-- ~ r ~ ~ l =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me Burin the g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. . __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - - _ millllllllllllllllilllllllllilliillllillllllilllllilllilllillllllillllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllililillllllitl~ ~iuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiuiii~ - - _ _ _ _ __ _~ _ , _~ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~V ' c ~ =_ APPE CE REQUEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: L. ~~ 1 IG~~;~ ~ ` ~ v' l n(r I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GRDUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. =_ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = - - _ fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~t~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~'111 ~Illlllllllllllllllllliililllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillilllllilllllllllllllilllilll,~,F,, _ _ ~3 - - - - _ _ - ,l - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~/ __ APPE CE RE UE ST =_ _ Q _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ c SUBJECT: ~ ~~. __ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Boa rd of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - _ mlliillllllllllllillllililllllillllillllllllll Illiillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllillllliillllilllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllm ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ _ _ - - - - _ _ ~ `~ AGENDA ITEM NO. V~ = = - - - - APPE CE REQUEST = -_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS c - - - -_ - - SUBJECT: ~~, B~~ - ~ J~ t`f'~ ~ =_ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ _. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to = __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ filllilllilllllliilllillllllilllllllillllll ilillllll iIIIIlillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllilllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllillm lljIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111ii~iIIIIG illllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllljll - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 1, - ~ S APPE CE REQUEST __ __ PUBLIC HEARING ~_ ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ SUBJECT: ~~~~~ n ~_s ~ ~ z~~ ~ o r ~ c_~ i ~~ ~~n, /-~ ~' ~~'~ ~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me Burin the g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to c c p g . omment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. . __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - = mllliilllilllllllilllllllllllllilll`~ .~~rlilllillllllll~llllllllllilllllllllllllllliilillliillllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllilllm ~iiiiu~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiii~uiiiiiuiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiniti~ _ 1~I~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ .~ _, ~~ _` ~ ~ = APPE CE REQUEST _ _ = - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: 1, ~ ~'~~~iUl /~J ~ ~~ c:~,~~, ~ i i i ~_~" ._ _ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment p g c _ , = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ __ vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ fi~~~~~t~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~111 ~Illlllillllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllll~ _ _ _ _ - _~? AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ - - " PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CI TIZENS COMMENTS =_ -_ ~---~ SUBJECT: C-- ~ ~ - ~~ ~.. ~ m ~,-- .r ,y, ~t s C7~.~..,,,1,~ . ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me Burin the g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comme t whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK j k!`, ~ ~ '~ ` ~ ~ fit' ~,~. ,. ~fJc~.~..~c ~CS ~ '~"'~( / ,p,~ ~ ~_ ~~ } r ~ ~t by ~ ~~ril'.,$ ~ ,J'~ S NAME ..~ v 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , %tc~' i ,~ ~ ,~~ t s ~ a~~ ~' (G~ R z ~ add ADDRESS ~ ~X ~ l 7 i~ ~ ~ Jq ~y~~r ~~ _ i? ~ ~ ~~ .S -_ c PHONE =,1 ~' Z - ~3 z ~--~ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111m ~iiiui~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiuiiuiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. V ~ 1 = ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS CONIMENTS ~ SUBJECT• _- - ~ _ ~ - ~ - ~ - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between thre = _ p g , e to five minutes to comment = = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B EHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK <, - i ~~ 7 ~~ _ -_ NAME ~ r ~ j' /I~e.p1J _ ~ ~I - ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 PHONE ~ I ~ ~' m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m lUllllli~llllllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllflllllllllilll llllllllllillilillllllllilllllllllillllilllllllllllilllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - / - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - - _, -_ - - = SUBJECT: :.S ~ ~ ~ lJ1 ~ ~ °~ " 5 ~-~ _ - - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. - _ _- ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - - mllllllilllillillllllll IIIIIIIIIIIilill11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ~Illil~lillllllilillllllllllllilllllllllllllliliillllllillliillllllllllill11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111t1 - - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~', ~.__, - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - ~ - - ~ _ - _ , c SUBJECT: ,:~. ~: ,~~~~~ ~ - ! L.~ T ~ s ~/~// = - - - -_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - - - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their Point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - - - with the clerk. - -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - _ - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - :: _ - NAME ~ - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - ADDRESS G i ~ .3 ~~ i f ; ~ //,/l .~,ti~. ~ - - ~, ~a r~~ Zq~o /; - - - - _ - _ - - PHONE %' i'~' ~ ~:' ~ ~~~ IIIIIIIIIillillllllillllllllllilllilllllliilllllllllillllllllllillllllliilillilllllilllillillllllllllllillllllliilllliilllllllllnl O~ ROAN ,1,~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ai 1838 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 ~~~~~ ~r~ ~~~~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Mr. Edward Wold 3480 Alltree Trail Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Wold: July 29, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Social Services Advisory Board, representing the Catawba Magisterial District, for a four-year term. Your term will begin on August 1, 1993, and expire August 1, 1997. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of Oa Wye before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered ,prior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have the oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requested that you bring this letter with you. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~ ~, H. O~I "Fuzz " Minnix~ Chairman Y Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures cc: Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Department Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court n ®Recyded Paper O~ pOANp, f~ ti z ~ <~ az rsas P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Ms. Betty Lucas 3608 Parkwood Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Lucas: July 29, 1993 BOARDOFSUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Social Services Advisory Board, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District, for a four-year term. Your term will begin on August 1, 1993, and expire August 1, 1997. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have the oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requested that you bring this letter with you. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very t my yours, H. Ode11""~uzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures cc: Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Department Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court F ® RecyGed Paper ~ ROAN ~.cc p z ~ ~ 2 a~ 13 C~~~xx~~ ~~ ~~xxY~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Mr. Clayton Goodman, III Town Manager Town of Vinton 311 Pollard Street Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Clay: July 15, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 At their meeting on July 13, 1993, the Board of Supervisors held the first reading on a proposed ordinance to strengthen Roanoke County Code provision to respond to attacks by vicious or dangerous dogs. The ordinance is similar to ordinances adopted by the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem. Supervisor Nickens requested that I send you a copy of the proposed ordinance. The Town of Vinton may wish to consider adoption of a similar ordinance. The second reading of the ordinance is scheduled for July 27, 1993, and if the ordinance is adopted I will have the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors forward you a final copy. Since ely, L` '~,.~ Elmer C. Hodge n) County Administrator ~, mha 0~ CC: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens '~ Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board lJ~ ® R~.ydad P~e~ ova aN~'F z ' ~ s' °v ;, ai 1838 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 July 28, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRIG-T BOB L. JOHNSON HOwNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Richard H. Burrow Project Engineer The River Foundation P. O. Box 457 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Burrow: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 72793-4 endorsing the submission of an ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Application by the River Foundation. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 ® Recycled paper . , ~. ,w~ ~~ ~~ ~" ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ .~Or~~~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COU NTY ADM I N ISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 July 29, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN UVE SPRING MAGLSTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L- JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. GTAWBA MAGISZERUL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINT'ON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 William B. Hopkins, Jr. Counsel for Roanoke County Martin, Hopkins, and Lemon, P. C. 416 South Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Hopkins: Attached are two certified copies of Resolution No. 72793-12 authorizing the acquisition of an easement through separate parcels of land owned by Jean O. Wallace, Charles W. Boone, and acquisition of a certain parcel of land in fee simple from the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey for the Water Transmission Line Project. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. Since Supervisor Johnson's motion of approval of the resolution asked that George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko be removed, all references to them in the resolution have been struck out and Exhibit B deleted. If you have any questions or need any further information, please let me know. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ®RecyCNd P>~er of aOAN ~- ~• .~ z J ? 1838 COUNTYADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~~xxr# ~#~ ~~xxr~a.~.~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 July 28, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY MIN NIX. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Franklin Hanks, Chairman Virginia Association RC&D Councils 110 West Spiller Street Wytheville, VA 24382 Dear Mr. Franks: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 72793-8.a of support and endorsement of Richmond County's Resolution for continued state funding of programs to accelerate the installation of dry fire hydrants. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, July 27, 1993. By copy of this letter, I am furnishing copies of this resolution to Chairman, Richmond County Board of Supervisors, and Mr. James Campbell, Executive Director, Virginia Association of Counties. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Attachment cc: T. C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue The Honorable W. D. Gray James D. Campbell of Supervisors :~ ,~ ® Recycled Paper O~ ROAN ,I,~ a ~ ~ ~ p z a2 7838 C~~ix~#g ~~ ~.~~x~~~P P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 July 29, 1993 BOARDOFSUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mary F. Parker, CMC, AAE Roanoke City Council. 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk Vinton Town Council P. O. Box 338 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mary and Carolyn: Attached is a copy of Resolution execution of an agreement between th Roanoke, and the City of Roanoke, between said governmental entities. the Board of Supervisors at their 1993. No. 72793-5 authorizing the e Town of Vinton, the County of relocating the boundary line This resolution was adopted by meeting on Tuesday, July 27, If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment t ® Racydad Paper Fa a 0 ~• z J ~ 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HO~GE (703) 772-2004 ~~r~~~ ~r~ .nr~~~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Editor Roanoke Times and World News P.O. Box 2491 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 To the Editor: (703) 772-2005 I would like to clear up some misconceptions in a July 22 editorial by David W. Sligh concerning Roanoke County, where he expressed concern over the administration of the Comprehensive Plan and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. With respect to the proposed rezonings in the vicinity of Cotton Hill Road and the Blue Ridge Parkway, Mr. Sligh's understanding of the comprehensive planning process and its relationship to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is inaccurate. The Comprehensive Plan is not a law, but a guide by which to measure land use requests. State law requires that the Comprehensive Plan be general in nature. The zoning ordinance, however, is a law. It must be developed with reasonable consideration of the Comprehensive Plan, along with the suitability of property for various uses, trends in growth, and other items. The County's new zoning ordinance did just this. Southwest Roanoke County, with its access to public water and sewer, subdivision activity, close proximity to fire and rescue facilities, and adequate major streets, has become an urban service area. The services have followed the people moving to that area, and the County did not encourage or initiate the growth. Route 221 was recently upgraded by the State of Virginia, based on plans which date back to 1978, and this will spur even greater growth in that area. The County recognizes this, and is working respon- sibly and diligently to provide protection to the recreational, cultural, economical and natural resources which the Parkway provides to us, while planning for the future citizens of the area. Mr. Sligh's comments concerning the County's Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and the Smith Gap Landfill are equally erroneous. Since the beginning, County staff has worked with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, Olver Incorporated, and Thomas ~ r ` ~ t_° BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELI'FUZZY MINNIX. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. July 23, 1993 cATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ® ReCyded Paper Brothers, to make sure that all County ordinances are met. The landfill is a large undertaking, which involves extensive coordination with various state and local agencies. It involves the clearing and grading of 100 acres, and is one of the largest active excavating projects in southwestern Virginia. When violations of the County's Erosion and Sediment Control Plan were noted, proper notices were issued, including "stop work orders", to bring the project under compliance. Unfortunately, the off-site erosion problems that have been experienced in the area are the result of large storms which caused flooding in that area. The first time the property in question was flooded, the Resource Authority, at its expense, had the house, basement and yard cleaned and repaired. After the second storm, both the Authority and the owner of the property agreed that it would be best for the Authority to purchase the property to prevent a re-occurrence of the situation. County staff continues to monitor the development biweekly, and also visits within two days following any run-off producing storm event. The County's Erosion and Sediment Control Program has obtained certification of its staff through the State Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Ina 1991 document entitled "Evaluation of Virginia's Local Erosion and Sediment Control Programs", the Division of Soil and Water Conservation stated that of the 171 local programs, "... 23% met the 15 point standard for adequacy." Roanoke County's program was one of these. The Roanoke County staff is professional, responsive, and dedicated to making sure that everyone is treated fairly and equitably. In the future I would hope that Mr. Sligh, who is an employee of the State Water Control Board and a neighbor of the landfill, would call the County and discuss his concerns with us. Sincerely, ~~ /' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors David Sligh Neil Obenshain, State Water Control Board John Hubbard, Roanoke Valley Resource Authority 6/28 1 c .~~ . ~. '/~ Telephone Conversation with Mar ......,.~ .. 3 p•m• Will call back closer tgoaret Nichols. She chose July 27 at Mary Allen the date to confirm. VML INSURANCE PROGRAMS June 11, 1993 The Honorable H. Odell Minnix Chairman, Board of Supervisors Roanoke County 3314 Kenwick Trail Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Minnix: ~~ -.'~.,, ',~t , /~ " 1 ~ F a f ~ ,1 .y ~ , 3 p r>1 ~:~~ ~~ r ~ ~, ~;~~ Each year the VMLP recognizes members which have made a significant contribution to the program by reducing and controlling losses. On behalf of the Members' Supervisory Board, it is my pleasure to inform you that Roanoke County has been selected as a recipient of the Safety Performance Award for the fund year ending June 30, 1992. At your convenience I would like to present this award to Roanoke County and staff. Please notify me of the time and location you would prefer this presentation take place. Once the presentation has been finalized the Association will issue a press release to the local media of your choice on the details of the award. Congratulations on this achievement and thank you for your continued efforts in making the V'~,F a success. erely , Margaret A. s Administrator cc: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Robert C. Jernigan, Risk Manager F'.U. BOX 12164 /RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23241 /804/649-8471 /FAX 8041343-3758 ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS AN ~ RECREATION UEPARTM ENT T0: Anne Marie Green FROM: Debbie Pitts ~J DATE: July 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Civil War Re-enactment Board Resolution July 27 Thank you for your help in preparing the Resolution for the upcoming Civil War re-enactment. Mary Allen has placed this item on the July 27 Board agenda. Captain B. Keith Sheppard, Lieutenant Bruce E. Mayer, and Vic Middlekoff will accept the resolution on behalf of the Department of Parks and Recreation. They will be dressed in the civil war uniforms worn during the actual re-enactment. Attached is a copy of last year's resolution, a summary of last year s event, and information on this year's event. If you need more information or any help, please let me know. cc: Ricky Showalter Eddie Ford John Chambliss Mary Allen -::G I ~~ ~ Synopsis of the Battle of South Salem An estimated crowd of 5,000-6,G00 people attended the Civil War Re- Enactment, held August 8 & 9, at Green Hill Park. The event was a great success, with X50 re-enactors, famil3- members, and sutlers participating. In its inaugural year, the event was able to turn a profit, without a major sponsor's support. The support from re- enactors, sutlers, families, media, county offices, county officials, private citizens, and Parks and Recreation Staff was the key to this event's success. In August 1991, the Special Events Staff presented a bud~'et of $12,281.00 for the Re-Enactment. kith donations, , the final e:~penditures Caere c~it to S6,819.1~. e t¢ cTr~.~ y The Special Events Staff is prcud that this event met its foals of being educational, historical, and self-supporting. ke feel this event shows how the support of both the county, and private citizens care pave the wa;: for a larger ann~ial anticipated evert. If yogi have and- questions, concerns, or ideas, please contact Eddie Ford, or Bill Thorne. Thank you for your support. Roanoke (;ounty~Staff 't'hat Helped with the Re-Enactment Charles Hill Barbara Berrv James Osbv~ Paul Jones Larry Greene Jeff Balon Cecil Reynolds Charlton ttiilson teal ter ~lundv Robert Brocan I~iark Pauley kayne Davis Robert McClain James Jones Phillip Carper Debbie Pitts Betsy Dennis Bill Sgrinia Ricky Showalter Polly Yeager Rebecca tvillhide Gary Creasy- Howard Guthrie Paul Nester Teresa Flanary- Myra Sellers Elizabeth DeHart Marcia Patton Steve Bobbin Karen daCosta Harriett Childress Donna Ould TOTALS A) Total number of Re-Enactors was between 400-500. B) Re-Enactors from B states participated in the event. C) The State of Virginia provided the Re-Enactment with participants from 30 different cities and towns. AUCr-28-1992 09=15 ROANO{~ COUYfY 703 772 2089 P.01 t~s-r y~~~ -~~ iw-~~~~. AT A ~tEGfULAR ~iEETIN(3 O$ THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS QP ROANORg COUNTY`, VIRl3INIA, H$LD AT THE 1t0~1NU~ COUNTY AD~dINIBTRATIODT CENTER QN TUESriAY~ JUNE 12, 1992 RE80LUTION 6332-3 DECL~RG} THg W~ggp~p Og AIIGIIST 7 - 9, 1992 AS +~T$E BATTLE O$ $QUTg SAI,I'H~+ WBHF~tA9, on June 21, 1864, almost exactly one hundred and twenty-eight yews aqo today, Confederate forces, under the - leadership of Major GBneral Jubal Early, and Unian forces, under the leadership of Major General Dav~,d Hunter, engaged in a battle at xanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 4I9 in Roanoke County; and W$EREAB, prior to that battle, th+are was a skirmish near the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also iri Roanoke County, known as xuntez''s Raid or the South Salem Engage- aent~ and WHEREAS both evantsc wore imgortant to the course of the - civil War in southwest Virginia; and iPgEREAB, on August 7, 8 and 9, 1992, there Will be a re- enactment of the Battles of south Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke county. NOW, '='~R~FpRE, 88 ZT R$$QLyED~ that the Roanoke County Boaxd of Supervisors dens hereby declare the waQ3cand of August 7~9, 1992 ae ++T~ gATT~ Og Bc~Dfig S~nr azid extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful rs-enactment of the event. On motion of supervisor Minni,t to adapt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vats: AYES ~ Supervisors Johnson, Rotiinkn, 1Ki23I'liX, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: NOrie AUCr28-1992 @915 COLNfY 703 772 2089 P.02 A . COpY ~~ - w ~ Brenda J. xo on, Deputy Cierk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ac: Filo 1~ssolutions of Appreciatf.on Films - ~ ..'l - ... ~ ~_ ~ _. ~. ~ ~ r~ r~ r 4 ti~ tip. ; ~ ~.. - _ 1^ iii .. ~ _ b} a '. sy.'~41 _ _ ~ - - ..-sctn. F". -.~ ra ~~. ~~-~~ -;t JULY 27 ~.-PH - 6 year Secondary System t.~'ISTEA Grants ,~-Reso-Civil War Reenactment a"Reso-Chocking girl e~'Recog-VML Safety Award ~•lst & PH - Amateur radio towers "1st - Rezonings adjacent to Blue Ridge Pkway ~-2nd - Vicious Dog Ord "special Use - Church Building, Catawba Rezone R-1 to R-2, Wood Haven Rd-Hollins ~.-Public-Private Partnership Report - SSE/R Reso-Appointed School Board members ~ Reso-Dry Fire Hydrans ,;'"Briefings - Landfill, Water Project f `~T` ~. . !~ 1 4 ~ ~: .~ •: i " •1 .~ i otter to Eln ~~, ~ ``.~, 199 ale 2 'c .%Y" ~ .. rl L: ~~ I ~. '~ ~ - ~ = r~~ ~. .~ G~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~+ ~ o ~ a~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .A ~~~ y ~+ (Q p 3 ~ .o R b, N G ~ Q. ~ cC a ~ w ° ~ ~' a ~., ~ • a a a~ 'o ~ ~ ~ .Li U '~ L' {". ~ W a Q ~ ~ p a 9r p e~. ~ a w ~~ c ~ ° ~ C, iog ~° ~qc~c~' cC ~ O ~ ~ r"' w L ~ ~ ~ ~ U 3 ,. ~_-__\ c // ~~.\. ~ ~ ~+e j F ~ ~~'z ' ~ ~~ \, \. V1 A " I~ ~ c~ .. - ~ • ~ ~ ~ i~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ '~'' _ \ .,..~ ~ ~ ~. y ~ ~. W O ea _ a Q ' ~ UcL •3 :ao ^l W N VK C ' N. N A CL Z O a~ - •~ C ~ ~ ~ U ~ g . o O ~ h C p vi ~, ~ ~ s _ - ~ ~ a~ ~~~~ °,~ °a~~ U ~ ~" u ~ a ~~ ~o~ a~ ~ o ;~ O U w -w~, - ' _ ro ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V Q~ a~.+ - C _ - ~ ~ 0 ~ _ a~+ a r ~ H Q~ .-a-1 y 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~E. L U y~ 'O O ~ .0 ~ C ~ w u. C .~ N ~ O -y Y U ..y ~ ~ ~ ca ~ cC •Cj • Q .~ •.~ ~ ,moo ~a.`*'o~ cn.. ?~ ~~ c~~ ~a~'~~~' U ~ ~ ~ .o ro ~° ~ L o ~ a .~ 8~ ~ a c ?3 Rn, ,~ U ~ ~ -~ ~ C41 C.' V~ G+ ~W~i O'+--I ~ ,Ll ~. ~ - _~~. .ate,. O ~ ° ~. ~ ' `1'y - w, w 'O o.:'o c~C ~ y .b' U .0 U .0 y ~ ~ ~ ~ N L;y i.., a~ = Q Q Q Q cCV ~ a ~ c°v ' O ~ W cCa ~ ~ ~ O a~ bon ban ~ ° ~., ~ F .-~ N ri v ~ ~ r o0 0; •~ F ~ ~ b 3 ~ o. ~-~. ~- _~ RESOLUTION REGARDING DRY HYDRANTS ~,y r,... WHEREAS, a dry hydrant is a nonpressurized pipe system that is installed in an existing lake, pond, or stream to provide an easily accessible source of year-round water for firefighting; and 'J~'HEII;~;AS, with installation of dry fire hydrants, homeowners and property owners would receive improved fire protection that would reduce loss of life and property; and WHEREAS, by promoting security and safety in rural areas economic development is encouraged; and WHEREAS, dry hydrants save fuel and time during firefighting; and WHEREAS, water conservation is increased by Fire Departments utilizing dry hydrants which reduces the volume of pressurized and purified town water that is used; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly passed legislation in 1992 which requested a plan be developed that identified the needed network of dry hydrant sites in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Forestry completed an inventory that documented the need for 3,678 dry hydrant installations at an estimated cost of $7.3 million; and WHEREAS, the state appropriated funds to be spent in FY 1993 and FY 1994 to :vitiate a demorstradon program whic!: provide_~ cost s: ~:e :rlo :ies to f;re departments to install dry hydrants; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Richmond County Board of Supervisors supports the continued state funding of programs which encourage and enable fire departments to install dry hydrants. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Richmond County Board of Supervisors requests that the Virginia Association of Counties add to their 1994 legislative agenda a resolution of support for state funding of programs that enable and encourage fire departments to accelerate the installation of dry fire hydrants. Date: March 22, 1993 By; /~ ~-~'' ~~ i W. D. Gray, ha><rman, Richmond attest: Board of Supervisors oun Administrator ~hairman ALD. "Berry" Gray 1_loyd E. Saunders Louis G. Packett James A. "Jack" Mullin A. Myers France County Administrator aection District 3 Election District 1 Election District 2 Election District 4 Election District 5 Stephen K. Whiteway Richmond County $oard of Supervisors 10 Court Street P. O. Box 1000 Warsaw, Virginia 22572 (804) 333-3415 FAX (804) 333-3408 MARTIN, HOPKINS & LEMON, P.C. WILLIAM B. HOPKINS WILLIAM J. LEMON WILLIAM B. HOPKINS. JR. STEPHEN W. LEMON HAR RIETTE H. SHIVERS KIRK A. LUDWIG *ALSO ADMITTED IN GEORGIA SIXTH FLOOR BOXLEY BUILDING TELEPHONE 17031 982-1000 416 SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET FACSIMILE 17031 982-2015 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 240 1 1-2007 MAILING ADDRESS P. O. BOX 13366 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24033-3366 JAMES C. MARTIN 11874-19571 WILLIAM L. MARTIN 11910-19891 July 22, 1993 HAND DELIVERED Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting, July 27, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. Dear Ms. Allen: Please find enclosed an original of a Board Report and a Resolution for the Board of Supervisors meeting on July 27, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. At Vickie Huffman's suggestion, I have also enclosed a disk which contains this report and resolution so that any corrections or additions to these papers can be made. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, MARTIN, HOPKINS AND LEMON, P.C. William B. Hopkins, Jr. WHJ/gfh Enclosures cc: Paul M. Mahoney, Esq. MEMBER COMMONWEALTH LAW GROUP, LTD. ~ ~ t REPORT TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGARDING CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 27, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-238(E) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT THROUGH SEPARATE PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY JEAN O. WALLACE, GEORGE R. AND WANDA C. JANOSKO, CHARLES W. BOONE AND ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN FEE SIMPLE FROM THE HEIRS AT LAW OF JAMES W. CASEY, JR. AND MARGARETTE E. CASEY BACKGROUND' As part of the Water Transmission Line Project, a number of properties have been previously acquired. The County has been unable to reach an agreement with the following landowners: Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko and Charles W. Boone. The County cannot reach an agreement with the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr, and Margarette E. Casey because such heirs cannot be located. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The subject properties are necessary for the Water Transmission Line Project in order to construct water transmission lines from the Roanoke County Water Treatment Plant to various parts of the County. These parcels of land are owned by the persons described above and are more particularly described as follows: ! t t (a) OWNER: Jean O. Wallace; property description: Parcel of land located on Brahma Road and Burnham Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 76.03-3-70) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT A" showing water and sewer easement to be acquired from Jean O. Wallace. In an effort to reach a settlement with Mrs. Wallace, the County offered $913.00 to Mrs. Wallace. Mrs. Wallace, through her attorney, declined this offer and requested $12,975. Consequently, it is necessary at this time to go forward with eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction as previously directed by the Board. The County obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value and damages to the residue for the proposed acquisition of the Jean 0. Wallace property from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition is $913.00. The proposed permanent easement is 50 feet wide and 1,823.4 feet long. The total easement area is 91,000 square feet. Because of the width of the permanent easement, there is no need for a temporary construction easement. Mr. Robertson valued the permanent easement at $912.64; and placed no damages to the residue. The total estimated value of the taking was rounded off to $913.00. (b) OWNER: George R. and Wanda C. Janosko; property description: Parcel of land located south of Crystal Creek Drive, Roanoke County, Virginia 2 (Roanoke County Tax Map Nos. 97.01-2-2 and 97.01-2-3) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT B" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be acquired from George R. Janosko and Wanda C. Janosko. The County made a written offer of $378.00 to Mr. and Mrs. Janosko. Mr. and Mrs. Janosko have agreed to this amount, but have imposed additional terms to the proposed agreement. The County may be able to reach a final agreement with the Janoskos before July 27. If not, as with the Jean O. Wallace property, it is necessary to institute eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction. The County obtained an independent appraisal of the Janosko property from Earl G. Robertson. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition is $378.00. The proposed permanent easement is 20 feet wide and 331 feet long and runs parallel to a road which cuts through the property. The total easement area is 6,620 square feet. Mr. Robertson determined the value of the permanent easement to be $334.00; the value of the temporary construction easement as $34.00 and zero damages to the residue. The total estimated value of the taking, therefore, is $378.00. (c) OWNER: Col. Charles w. Boone; property description: Parcel of land located off of Lapping Lane, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 65.00-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT C" showing water and sewer easement and temporary construction easement to be 3 acquired from Col. Charles W. Boone. The County made a written offer on July 21, 1993 to Col. Charles W. Boone of $221.00. Col. Boone has not accepted the offer and has not made a counter-offer. Based on a conversation between an agent of the County and Col. Boone, he is not expected to accept this offer. Accordingly, it is necessary to start eminent domain proceedings to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction. Earl G. Robertson also appraised the Boone property. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value and damages to the residue of the proposed acquisition to be $221.00. The proposed permanent easement is 25 feet wide and contains 20,010 square feet. A 10 feet wide construction easement runs along both sides of the permanent easement and contains 16,008 square feet. Mr. Robertson valued the permanent easement at $201.00, the temporary construction easement at $20.00 and placed no damages to the residue for a total of $221.00. (d) OWNER: Heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey; property description: Parcel of land located on 4000 block of Buck Mountain Road, Roanoke County, Virginia (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 97.08-1-42) See attached plat identified as "EXHIBIT D" showing parcel of land in fee simple to be acquired from the heirs at law of James W. Casey, Jr. and Margarette E. Casey. The County cannot locate the Casey heirs. Accordingly, there have been no negotiations. Consequently, it is necessary at 4 this time to go forward with eminent domain proceedings and to gain immediate right of entry for commencement of Project construction as previously directed by the Board The County obtained an independent appraisal of the estimated fair market value of the proposed acquisition of the Casey property from Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, of Commonwealth Appraisal Company. Mr. Robertson determined that the estimated market value of the proposed acquisition is $2,950. The lot to be acquired has 18,000 square feet or 0.41 acres. Mr. Robertson valued the fee simple interest in this lot at $2,950. This is a total take in fee, therefore, there are no damages to the residue and no need for a temporary construction easement. FISCAL IMPACT' Funds are available from the Water Transmission Line Project to pay the appraised value of these properties. ALTERNATIVES' 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition of and immediate right of entry to the subject properties identified above by eminent domain proceedings. 2. Authorize a counter-offer to Mrs. Wallace and solicit a counter-offer from Col. Boone. Authorize approval of change in terms of easement agreement requested by Mr. and Mrs. Janosko. The property of the Casey heirs can only be acquired by condemnation. 5 M W a0 z IQ go'W ?QO N o < o EX. 13" Z ~ ~' CHESTNUT OAK o~ ~s TAX #65.00-1-43 ' PROPERTY OF GRACE LEE HALE HUDSON U.B. 1355, PG. 1108 S 44'33'45" E + BLACK OAK IIEIY Y6' WATERLII~ EAd II~N' f0' TEI~ORARY - COMSTRUCTIOM EA8E1E1i1T8 EX. PRIVATE DRIVE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 S 44'33'45" E 30.34 2-3 S 10'54'43" W 68.74 3-4 S 09'15 00 E 321.48 4-5 S 05'59 09 E 159.24' 5-6 S 27'24 41 E 230.39 6-7 S 47'1615 W 25.92 7-8 N 27'24 41" W 241.97 8-9 N 05'59 09" W 163.26' 9-10 N 09'15 00" W 325.21 10-1 N 10'54 43 E 90.39 TOTAL AREA = 20 010 S.F. LEGEND EX. EXISTING D.B. DEED BOOK pG, PAGE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT S.F. SQUARE FEET / 1~ / o~°i 1 po ~ ~~h 11::j1 ~ Ex. s" 1...11 TAX #65.00-1-1 PROPERTY OF FIARRY C. MAUNEY & MARY D. MAUNEY D.B. 1287, PG. 1428 1 :;:,.~ POST OAK Il:::j.l 60.2' TAX #65.00-1-42 11< jl PROPERTY OF ~~.I-__ CHARLES W. BOONE 11.:11 D.B. 1401, PG. 292 11';1:11 o. I E1;:1 I IE:::~I 5 If::~1 ~~ ~ ~';:~\ \~::: . ~y ~~ .\\ 6 \`~:;:;,\\ ~' TAX X65.00-1-2 \\:::..\\ \\.:;' PROPERTY OF DAVID E. THOMAS & . ~ ~ MARTHA M. THOMAS W.B. 22, PG. 497 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON k EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 13 AUGUST 1992. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATERLINE EASEMENT = 20,010 S.F. 4. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 171. B. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 432, PG. 97. C. CHESAPEAKE k POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 282, PG. 386. D. WATER RIGHTS k RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 229, PG. 553. E. WATER RIGHTS & RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 223, PG. 397. F. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 103, PG. 597. G. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 91, PG. 167. H. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 61, PG. 3. I. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 174. PLAT SHOWING NEW 25' WATERLINE & NEW 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS Lz$ of y ~~Co-14-93 j''E' BEING GRANTED TO ~'' THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE 2, B. LEE HENDERSON, JR. Y ~3.q~.w~ BY CHARLES W. BOONE No. 1480 ACROSS TAX #65.00-1-42 1 p4 ~ SUR`1~ SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: 9 JUNE 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA n ~ W I Sa i k' ~~~ N =i~ _c ~s~ TAX }96.08-1-4 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELE ~ EU3ERT H. WALORON D.B. 1327, PG. 918 NEW 20~ WATER k SEWER EASEMENT UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N 77'35 Ot W 57.40 2-3 S 84'48 04 W 266.67 3-4 N 43'331 B W 25.50 4-5 N 84'48 04 E 285.59 5-6 S 77'35 01 E 52.36 6-1 S 09'43 38 E 21.59 TOTAL AREA a 6 620 S. F. - EX. FENCE ON UNE (IYP.) TAX /97.01-2-2 PROPERTY OF ~, ~~ GEORGE R. JANOSKO k POST WANDA C. JANOSKO D.B. 1288, PC. 1398 ~W ~- r~POe~r coKSrRVCnoN ~sawdrr x~r soy Wsrrrr s aEr-a --~ l~i18EA~MT __ .~ ~ ~ !3 `~- X PROPERTY OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) .- -.t - S 6 8'1.~, W,~` N' 34.80' ~ ~ EX. PARKWAY MONUMENT EX. MARKED 42' RED OAK TAX X97.01-2-5 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELE r!< x ELBERT H. WALDRON ~~ D.B. 793, PG. 124 ~w (.1~ 1 °'--EX. EAST TENNESSEE ,r, ~: NATURAL GAS CO. ~„ '- ~ _ EASEMENT D.B. 751, PG. 455 W '~~~ ~\ NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATER de SEWER AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2, THIS PUT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS. LEMON. de EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 6 JULY. 1992. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATER do SEWER EASEMENT ~ 6,620 S.F. 4. IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT TO CREATE THE 20' WATER do SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY EASEMENT RECORDED IN D.B. 751, PG. 455. 5. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. DAM. ROAD do WATER RIGHT'S RESERVED. D.B. 202, PG. 297. B. 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY. D.B. 142, PG. 348. C. ROAD AGREEMENTS, D.B. 480, PG. 68. D. ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS, D.B. 1005, PG. 119, D.B. 233, PG. 598, D.B. 1288, PG. 1396. E. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENTS, D.B. 293, PG. 59, D.B. 475, PG. 307. F. ACCESS AGREEMENT, D.B. 454, PC. 468. 6. THE NEw EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUM©RANCE: A. EASY TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 751, PG. 455. PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' WATER & SEWER EASEMENT __ A~1D ~.~W ~~' TEit~IP~RARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT tix GF BEING GRANTED TO ~d pr THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ,~~~ G" ~°'~ ~G,, BY ~ RENDER ON, JR. ~ GEORGE R. JANOSKO & ,~ /~ WANDA C. JANOSKO ~~~ 148 ACROSS TAX X97.01-2-2 SCALE: 1" 100' DATE: 22 OCT08ER 1992 REVISED: 28 JUNE 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ... ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~ PROPERTY OF ~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) D.B. 444, PG. 438 D.B. 785, PG. 169 NG~ ~~ m ~o So9ti o u+ 6' r ~-ey o I ~~~0 W 9N y ~~.C .O ~y a~ LEGEND EX. EXISTING I,p. IRON PIN N.P.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACT. ACTUAL R/W RIGHT OF WAY D.B. DEED BOOK pG. PAGE EX. N.P.S. MONUMENT EX. I.P. BEARS _ N 70'12'00" W 2.00' EX. I.P. BEARS N 70'12'00' W FROM CORNER #3 N 70'12'00' W 100.00' 59.00' (ACT.) i FROM CORNER ~3 60.00' (DEED) ~ ~~S ~~~~ SET I.P. 3 ~ ,~t~~~pS $ 5 PORTION OF ~ / ~'-pSS ~' QG. LOT 18 ~ 5~ ~Pg'L• ~ ~ ~'P~~pO'~ ~ ~ EX. 20' WATERLINE ~ ~ i EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ D.B. 1381, PG. 662 ~ i i i ii ~ i M ~/ // ~ N / i , ~ ~ EX. 10' TEMPORARY / / ~ / ~ / / CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT D.B. 1381, PG, 662 i 7 08 1-41 ~ fV / N ~ i ~ TAX X97.08-1-42 ~ TAX #9 - ~ PROPERTY OF JAMES W., Jr. & MARGARETTE E. CASEY 3 D.B. 836, PG. 142 ~+-~ D.B. 765, PG. 106 0 0 17,307 S.F. ~ ~ 0.397 Ac. f ~ °~ z PROPERTY OF FRANK E. MILLS D.B. 1229, PG. 320 LOT 17 MAP OF THOMAS H. BEASLEY SUBDIVISION P.B. 3, PG. 61 EX. SLOPE/DRAINAGE EX. N.P.S. EASEMENT MONUMENT D.B. 777, PG. 586 ®15.87' - ~ - - - _ 4 ~ SET I.P. SET I.P.J~ S 69'28"02" E 59.01' ACT.) BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD 60.00' DEED) VA. SEC. RTE. #679 J R/W VARIES NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON A CURRENT FlELD SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFlT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON do EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 1 JUNE 1992. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIG- NATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFlED BY ACTUAL FlELD ELEVATIONS. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. VIRGINIA k TENNESSEE TELEPHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 73, PG. 38. B. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 426, PG. 382. C. WATER UNE EASEMENT RESERVED, P.B. 3, PG. 61. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON IS AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT, D.B. 777, PG. 586. B. 50' EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 752, PG. 588. PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY (0.397 Ac.) BEING CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE yTH Op BY D ~~3_~Z_~ j~~ ~ JAMES W. CASEY, Jr. & ~ MARGARETTE E. CASEY , B LEE HENDERSON a SITUATED ALONG BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD a a ~~ CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT , No. 1480 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA t'~'D ~~04' TAX #97.08-1-42 SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 12 MARCH 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Ww ~~ i~ ~~ N Z Z oi3~ ~55N TAX }96.08-1-4 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELS tc =LBERT H. WALDRON D.B. 1327, PG. 918 NEW 20' WATER be SEWER . EASEMENT UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N 77'35 Ot W 57.44 2-3 S 84'48 04 W 266.67 3-4 N 43'3316 W 25.SD 4-.5 N 84'48 04 E 285.59 5-6 S 77'35 Ot E 52.36 6-1 S 09'43 38 E 21.59 TOTAL AREA = 6 620 S. F. - EX. FENCE ON UNE (TYP.) 7AX /97.01-2-2 PROPERTY OF ~ ~~ GEORGE R. JAN05K0 be POST WANDA C. JANOSKO D.B. 1288, PG. 1396 lIEW f6' T~Y°ORdRY coksreucnoN ~aawolrT ~r to' Wang a arFr'a Li18E1(l~MT ~ - - -"'- X PROPERTY of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) ~2 ~~^ d~,, S8 8'1"W H;~ EX. PARKWAY IAONU1.tENT EX. MARKED 42' RED OAK 7AX X97.01-2-5 PROPERTY OF T.D. STEELS !c .~ ELBERT H. WALDRON ~a4 D.B. 793, PC. 124 f NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATER k SEWER AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUC710N EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON, do EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 6 JULY, 1992. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATER do SEWER EASEMENT ~ 6.620 S.F. 4. 17 t5 THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT TO CREATE THE 20' WATER k SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY EASEMENT RECORDED IN D.B. 751, PG. 455. 5. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. DAM, ROAD k WATER RIGHTS RESERVED, D.B. 202, PG. 297. 8. 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY, D.B. 142. PG. 348. C. ROAD AGREEMENTS, D.B. 480, PG. 66. D. ROAD RIGHT-oF.-wAY EASEMENTS, D.B. 1005, PG. 119, D.B. 233, PG. 598, D.B. 1288, PG. 1396. E. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENTS, D.B. 293, PG. 59, D.B. 475, PG. 307. F. ACCESS AGREEMENT, D.B. 454, PG. 468. 6. THE NEw EASEMENTS aS SHOWN HEREON ARE NO7 AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUM©RANCE: A. EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 751, PG. 455. PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' WATER & SEWER EASEMENT -- ~I~D ~E-W ~~' PE~IPO~RARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO ~~'x of °r THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~~~~ G ~ 3° ~ ~~' BY ~° RENDER ON, JR. ~~S GEORGE R. JANOSKO & ~,~,~,~~„~ ~ WANDA C. JANOSKO No. 1480 ~ ~ ACROSS TAX ~J97.01-2-2 SCALE: 1" a 100' DALE: 22 OCTOBER 1992 REVISED: 28 JUNE 1993 LLTMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. -.. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~` i '-EX. EAST TENNESSEE n NATURAL GAS CO. . - . _ EASEMeNT D.B. 751, PG. 455 1 ^ '` 1 \ ~ PROPERTY OF ~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY) D.B. 444, PG. 438 D.B. 785, PG. 169 o~ NG -~ s ~ o9n~ r ~? c ~ m~~o c,~ 'yam ~ ~~~ a~ LEGEND ~, EXISTING I,p, IRON PIN N.P.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACT. ACTUAL R/W RIGHT OF WAY D.B. DEED BOOK pG, PAGE EX. N.P.S. MONUMENT i ~ i rn ~ N / N i EX. LP. BEARS ' _ N 70'12'00" W 2.00' EX. I.P. BEARS N 70'12'00" W FROM CORNER #3 N 70'1200' W 100.00' 59.00' (ACT.) ~ i FROM CORNER ~3 60.00' (DEED) ~ SET I.P. 3 / ~~ `~~ '~' F,P ~ / ~Pc''~ G~~G 50 PORTION OF ~ ~O~G~S~~,.e / LOT 18 ~ ~~ ~P 0' ~ EX. 20' WATERLINE i ~ ~P~ ~ i ~ EASEMENT / / ~ , / / ~ D.B. 1381, PG. 662 i i ii ~ i M'/ i~ ~ / N / i ~ ~ ~ EX. 10' TEMPORARY ~ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ~ ~ , ~ i D.B. 1381, PG, 662 i i i TAX X97.08-1-42 ~ / 7AX X97.08-1-41 ~ ~ PROPERTY OF JAMES W., Jr. 6c MARGARETTE E. CASEY 3 D.B. 836, PG. 142 w D.B. 765, PG. 108 0 °0 17,307 S.F. ° °O 0.397 Ac. v .r N 07 z PROPERTY OF FRANK E. MILLS D.B. 1229, PG. 320 LOT 17 MAP OF THOMAS H. BEASLEY SUBDIVISION P.B. 3, PG. 61 EX. SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT D.B. 777, PG. 586 - - 4 ~ SET I.P. EX. N.P.S. -~ MONUMENT ®15.87' - '- SET I.P.11 S 69'28'02" E 5s.o1' AcT.) BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD - - - ~ 60.00' DEED) VA. SEC. RTE. ~Jfi79 R/W VARIES NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON A CURRENT FlELD SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFlT OF A TI1LE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON do EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 1 JUNE 1992. 3. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIG- NATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFlED BY ACTUAL FlELD ELEVATIONS. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. VIRGINIA k TENNESSEE TEIJ=PHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 73, PG. 38. B. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 426, PG. 382. C. WATER LINE EASEMENT RESERVED, P.B. 3, PG. 61. 4. THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON IS AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA SLOPE/DRAINAGE EASEMENT, D.B. 777, PG. 586. B. 50' EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 752, PG. 588. PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY (0.397 Ac.) BEING CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~AyTH Op ` 1 BY ~43_~Z_~ ~~ JAMES W. CASEY, Jr. & x ' MARGARETTE E. CASEY B LEE HENDERSON, JR. y SITUATED ALONG BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD PJ a~ CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT , No. 1480 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA t~ND ~~p4 TAX #97.08-1-42 SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 12 MARCH 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA i+l., ... un~ Z'7QC TAX ~J65.00-1-43 ' PROPERTY OF GRACE LEE HALE HUDSON D.B. 1355, PG. 1108 ~ z S 44'33'45' E + I n ,26'1 ~~ 4. z °~' z EX. 18"~ SLACK OAK IQN N o ¢ o EX. 13" z z ~' CHESTNUT OAK o ~ + ~5 AEIY 46' IYATERL.Oi~ EAB~ IIf1~M' !O' Ti~ORARr - CONBTRUC710N EASEIEAfTB EX. PRIVATE DRIVE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 S 44'33'45' E 30.34 2-3 S 10'54 43 W 68.74 3-4 S 09'15 00" E 321.48 4-5 S 05'59 09" E 159.24 5-6 S 27'24 41" E 230.39 6-7 S 47'1615 W 25.92 7-8 N 27'24 41 W 241.97' 8-9 N 05'59 09" W 163.26' 9-10 N 09'15 00' W 325.21 10-1 N 10'54 43 E 90.39 TO TAL AREA = 20 01 0 S.F. LEGEND EX. EXISTING D.B. DEED BOOK pG, PAGE NEW 25' WATERLINE EASEMENT S.F. SQUARE FEET 4 Y TAX x/65.00-1-1 PROPERTY OF F•IARRY C. MAUNEY & MARY D. MAUNEY D.B. 1287, PG. 1428 11.';::11 ~ Ex. 6" II:::jL-- POST OAK 11::;1.1 60.2' TAX ~j65.00-1-42 1;:.11 PROPERTY OF ~j~.{-__ CHARLES W. BOONE 11:.;11 D.B. 1401, PG. 292 11:x1 ?~ 4O I ~o~ o. I E::1 I t:;a I 5 11;~~ ^~ ~ ::;1\ \~?;;. . ,,o ~ .\~ 6 \~:;::;,\\ ~ TAX ~J65.00-1-2 \~:;::..\\ ~\:: PROPERTY OF DAVID E. THOMAS do , ~ ,~ MARTHA M. THOMAS W.B. 22, PG. 497 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS, LEMON do EDWARDS, P.C., DATED 13 AUGUST 1992. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW WATERLINE EASEMENT = 20,010 S.F. 4. THE NEW EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCES: A. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 171. B. APPALACHIAN EIECTRiC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 432, PG. 97. C. CHESAPEAKE k POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 282, PG. 386. D. WATER RIGHTS & RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 229, PG. 553. E. WATER RIGHTS k RIGHT OF WAY, D.B. 223, PG. 397. F. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 103, PG. 597. G. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 91, PG. 167. H. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, D.B. 61, PG. 3. I. APPALACHIAN ELECTRIC POWER CO. EASEMENT, D.B. 433, PG. 174. PLAT SHOWING NEW 25' WATERLINE & NEW 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS Lza of ~~Co-~4-93y1''P ~ BEING GRANTED TO ' THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~, B. LEE HENDERSON, JR. a ~.t~+~- BY CHARLES W. BOONE No. 1480 ACROSS TAX #65.00-1-42 1 p4 ~ s[rttW S CALE: 1" = 200' DATE: 9 JUNE 1993 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~. O~ AOANp~,~ ~ A °v a~ 7838 C~~~xxt#~ of ~~~xx~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CO U NTY ADM I N ISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Elmer Hodge i/ (~ ~~~~ Harry C. Nickens /~/'~~ . July 20, 1993 ROANOKE COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN VML (703) 772-2005 For some years I have questioned Roanoke County's membership in both VACo and VML. The cost is considerable to our taxpayers. I have been persuaded by you that we receive considerable benefit from VML mainly because we are an urbanizing county offering services much like those of the city. This obviously is the focus of VML. However, we are not a city, and I continue to see the agenda of VML as being one of cities and to a lesser extent, towns, possibly at the expense literally and figuratively of counties. Specifically, the Roanoke Times & World-News on July 20, 1993, again reports on VML's position to allow for the annexation by cities of counties. I am asking that you provide me and other members of the Board with cost figures relative to our membership in VML. Will these dues ultimately be used in support of positions that may be counter to that of Roanoke County or other Virginia counties in general? They are already, as is obvious from the Roanoke Times & World-News article, being expended for staff to express positions in public forums that may be counter to that which we or other counties wish them to take. When do we have to pay membership dues? If that is imminent, I would ask that dues be withheld until I can address this as an agenda item on July 27, 1993. I am asking that this be placed as an agenda item rather than under the report section in that I may ask the Board for consideration of giving up membership in VML. HCN/bjh cc: Members, Board of Supervisors ®Fiecyded Paper 13, b ~ ~ °~3fSy ~,~~ o~ ~~ JULY ~, 1993 County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning actual litigation, namely the Grumman case, in accordance with Section 2.1- 344 A 7 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. (b) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning negotiations of a contract for the expansion of the sewage treatment plant in accordance with Section 2.1-344 A 7 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. Agenda Items for July 27 meeting First Readings: (1) Ordinance amending and reenacting the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County, by the adoption of certain miscellaneous changes throughout the County to said maps (Bonsack, Cotton Hill, Poages Valley Road) (2) Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by amending and reenacting Section 12-8, Adopting of State Law of Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code (3) Bingo Ordinance First Reading and Public Hearing: (1) Ordinance amending and reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, The Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, by the adoption of certain provisions concerning amateur radio towers in the various zoning districts of the County First Reading and Request for Public Hearing -Consent Agenda: (1) Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate an after school day care program, located at 3520 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Melrose Baptist Church Trustees Second Readings: (1) Ordinance amending and reenacting Sections 5-21, Definitions, and 5-44 Tax ImQosed, adding Sections 5-26.1 to 5-26.5 and repealing Section 5-26 of Article II. Dogs Cats and Other Animals, of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl of the Roanoke County Code to Control Dangerous and Vicious Dogs Second Readings and Public Hearings: (1) Ordinance to change the zoning classification of a 0.410 acre tract of real estate located west of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road (Tax Map No. 26.20-4-33) in the Hollins Magisterial District from the zoning classification of R-1 to the zoning classification of R-2 upon the application of Martha W. Cox (2) Ordinance granting a Special Use Permit to the Trustees of the Mason Cove Chapel to allow the expansion of an existing church building located at 3917 Old Catawba Road (Tax Parcel 15.02-1-10) Catawba Magisterial District Public Hearin: (1) Resolution requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an Order to hold a referendum on the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board, as provided in § 22.1-42 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended Consent A eg_nda: (1) Donation of a water and sanitary sewer easement on Parcel A, located on Glen Heather Drive to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County (1) Resolution for condemnation of four pieces of property -Water Transmission Line. (We are not sure if this will be done as one resolution or four different resolutions. Board reports and resolutions will be submitted by Bill Hopkins, Jr.) (2) Resolution A resolution authorizing the execution of an agreement between the Town of Vinton, the County of Roanoke, and the City of Roanoke relocating the boundary line between said governmental entities, and authorizing that certain other actions relating to such boundary line be taken as provided by law O~ ROAN ~~ ~. ~_~ of .. a ~$~ a$ SfSOUICEN7ENN~P~ .~ Btauti~ul8tglmm~g ~~ F~ ~5~~. ~.9 .g .9 FAX NUMBER: (703) 772-2089 DATE: COMPANY: ~ /~ ~' L~ ~~ FAX NUMBER: NO. OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: I FROM: MARY H. ALLEN, CLERK TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS # TO CALL IF TRANSMITTAL IS INCOMPLETE: 7 ~,2 ~- ...Z ~ ~ -~ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: /7 cam, ~~ s ~ G~ c ~. LEGAL NOTICE ~~~"- ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (~ The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, to receive public comments and suggestions on amending the official zoning maps of Roanoke County by modifying the zoning classification of certain properties in proximity of the Blue Ridge Parkway. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1993 _- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 13, 1993 Tuesday, July 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on July 27, 1993, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO § 22.1-42 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, TO CONSIDER THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY SHALL REQUEST THE JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER AN ORDER SETTING A REFERENDUM ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE METHOD OF SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY SHALL BE CHANGED FROM APPOINTMENT BY THE SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION CONL'~IISSION TO APPOINTMENT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~1~ ~ Paul M. Manoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: July 18, 1993 July 25, 1993 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN e - ~ D ~~ N~~ ~/')') . CC.u~ LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Mason Cove Chapel for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing church building, located at 3917 Old Catawba Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1993 1~''..LZ.s_~,~ C~~J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 13, 1993 Tuesday, July 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Mason Cove Chapel Trustees c/o Phillip Bandy 3857 Bradshaw Road Salem, VA 24153 (703) 384-7186 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Martha W. Cox to rezone 0.410 acres from R-1 to R-2 to construct a duplex, located west of 6707/6705 Wood Haven Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1993 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 13, 1993 Tuesday, July 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Martha W. Cox c/o Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron & Agee PO Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 WILLIAM B. HOPKINS WILLIAM J. LEMON WILLIAM 8. HOPKINS, JR. STEPHEN W. LEMON " HAR RIETTE H. SHIVERS KIRK A. LUDWIG ~A LSO ADMITTED IN GEORGIA MARTIN, HOPKINS & LEMON, P.C SIXTH FLOOR BOXLEY BUILDING 416 SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET ROANOICE, VIRGINIA 240 1 1-2007 July 15, 1993 HAND DELIVERED Martha Plank Legal Adc~rtising Roanoke Times and World News 201 Campbell Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Re: Dear Martha: Public Notice JUl. 1 ~ i993 TELEPHONE 17031 D82 MAILING ADDRESS a P. O. BOX 13366 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24033-3366 JAMES C. MARTIN 11874-1L 371 WILLIAM L. MARTIN 11910•IG891 Please find enclosed a Public Notice which I would appreciate you placing in the legal advertising section of The Roanoke Times and World News to run on Saturday, July 17, 1993 and on Saturday, July 24, 1993. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, MARTIN, HOPKINS & LEMON, P.C. ~~ 4~ ~.~, William B. Hopki s, Jr. WBHjr/lac Enclosure cc: Paul M. Mahoney, Esq. William P. Wallace, Jr., Esq. Mr. and Mrs. George R. Janosko Col. Charles W. Boone MEMBER COMMONWEALTH LAW GROUP, LTD. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at the County Administration Center, Community Room, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on July 27, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, pursuant to Section 15.1-238(E) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The purpose of such hearing shall be the consideration of the necessity of acquisition by condemnation or other means of an easement across certain property owned by Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko, Charles W. Boone and the heirs at law of James W. and Margarette E. Casey and the consideration of the necessity of entering upon and taking an easement across such property prior to or during the condemnation proceeding. The purpose of acquiring an easement over and across the property of Jean O. Wallace, George R. and Wanda C. Janosko, Charles W. Boone and the heirs at law of James W. and Margarette E. Casey is the construction and installation of water transmission lines for transmitting water from the Spring Hollow Reservoir to southwest Roanoke County and north Roanoke County. The property to be acquired as described above is located as follows: the property of Jean O. Wallace - Roanoke County tax map no. 76.03-3-70; the property of George R. and Wanda C. Janosko - Roanoke County tax map no. 97.01-2-2 and 97.01-2-3; the property of Charles W. Boone - Roanoke County tax map no. 65.00-1-42; and the property of the heirs at law of James W. and Margarette E. Casey - Roanoke County tax map no. 97.08-1-42. Any member of the public may appear at the time and place aforesaid and address the Board on the matter aforesaid. William B. Hopki s, Jr. counsel for Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publich on the following dates: July 17, 1993 July 24, 1993 Please send bill to: Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire Roanoke County Attorney P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24108 P U B L I C N O T I C E Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County at its meeting on the 27th day of July, 1993, at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: Adopt the Virginia Department of Transportation funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for fiscal year 1993-94. All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the proposed funding referred to above is on file at the Residency Office, State Highway Department, 714 South Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, and the Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia where it is available for public inspection during regular business hours. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PUBLISHED IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES: Tuesday, July 13, 1993 Tuesday, July 20, 1993 BILL TO: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, to receive public comments and suggestions on amending the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance text to modify provisions for amateur radio towers. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1993 ~ ,~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 13, 1993 Tuesday, July 20, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018