Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/25/2009 - Adopted Board Records ACTION NO. _A-082509-1____ ITEM NO. ____D-1___________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 25, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate funds in the amount of $1,000 to the Interstate-81 Corridor Coalition SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Interstate-81 (I-81) Corridor Coalition has been established to integrate the planning and decision making along the corridor. Issues such as freight movement and infrastructure, economic development, environment and land use, and safety and security must be dealt with in a comprehensive manner. The coalition members – comprised of federal, state and local government officials and private sector partners from New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia and Tennessee – intend to work cooperatively to identify common concerns, and develop and execute common visions and strategies to address issues along the I-81 corridor. The Steering Committee for the Coalition is comprised of 19 members, representing each of the states. Richard Flora is a member of this Steering Committee. The administration of the Coalition will be handled through Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania. They have developed a five year plan of operations. The Coalition will be attempting to secure federal funding for the majority of the expenses. They are currently asking for local contributions for startup expenses and to demonstrate the local commitment to the project. They are asking for contributions based on the miles of I-81 that are located within the local government unit, as follows: Less than 10 miles $500 10 to 25 miles $1,000 Greater than 25 miles $2,000 Page 1 of 2 This is requested as a one-time contribution, with the hope that the federal money will be available for the continuation of the plan. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on the above guidelines, Roanoke County’s contribution should be $1,000. These funds can be appropriated from the Board Contingency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriating $1,000 from the Board Contingency to the I-81 Corridor Coalition, as requested. VOTE: Supervisor Flora moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion Approved Yes No Absent Ms. Moore Mr. Church Mr. Flora Mr. McNamara Mr. Altizer cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 ORDINANCE 082509-2 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC. ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (TAX MAP #026.18-01-15.0-0000) TO PROVIDE TELEPHONE SERVICE TO THE GREEN RIDGE RECREATION CENTER, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County is constructing a new Green Ridge Recreation Center on Wood Haven Road and requires telephone service to this building; and, WHEREAS, Verizon Virginia, Inc. (Verizon) requires a 10-foot wide right-of-way and easement for placement of utility poles and installation of underground phone cable along Wood Haven Road through the Roanoke County property, designated on the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map #026.18-01-15.00-0000 and located at 7415 Wood Haven Road, Hollins Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, an emergency exists to the extent that the permanent installation of utility poles and underground lines for telephone service are promptly needed to avoid any delay in the scheduled completion and opening of the Green Ridge Recreation Center; and WHEREAS, the proposed right-of-way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 2009, and the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with since an emergency th exists, upon a 4/5 vote of the members of the Board. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Page 1 of 3 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on August 25, 2009, and a second th reading was dispensed with upon a 4/5 vote of the members of the Board as an emergency exists. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Verizon Virginia, Inc. for the provision of telephone service, also designated as a communication system, in connection with Roanoke County's construction of the new Green Ridge Recreation Center at 7415 Wood Haven Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 3. That donation to Verizon Virginia Inc. of an easement and right-of-way for placement of utility poles and related equipment, within the “10’VERIZONEASEMENT” on the County’s property (Tax Map #026.18-01-15.00-0000) extending along Wood Haven Road in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown on Verizon Drawing No. BCC- 88837-R, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved. 4. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Page 2 of 3 On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 082509-2 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, August 25, 2009. ___________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Page 3 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 ORDINANCE 082509-3 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BRENTWOOD COURT ON PLAT OF SECTION NO. 3 OF KINGSTON COURT, IN PLAT BOOK 11, PAGE 39, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK’S OFFICE, AND RETAINING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by Resolution 10990-4.c of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, a street designated as Brentwood Court extending from Chippenham Drive to a turn around or cul-de-sac, has been accepted into the State Secondary Road System, as shown on the plat of Section No. 3 of Kingston Court subdivision, recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, Plat Book 11, page 39; and WHEREAS, by subsequent action of the Board of Supervisors on September 9, 2008 and January 27, 2009, the street designated as Brentwood Court, Va Secondary Route 1893, after the abandonment of the initial length of Brentwood Court, was extended from its original point of beginning to the end of a new permanent cul-de-sac in this subdivision, as shown on the plat of The Manor of Kingston Court, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk’s Office in Plat Book 27, page 156; and WHEREAS, the extension of Brentwood Court has resulted in the abandonment of portions of the initial cul-de-sac which served as the initial terminus of that street and the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner has expressed his approval of the vacation or “quit” of those portions of the original cul-de-sac of Brentwood Court which no longer serve public convenience so as to warrant their maintenance at public expense; and Page 1 of 5 WHEREAS, the developers of The Manor at Kingston Court, Jeff Todd and Stephen Stillwell, and the property owners of Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 16, Block 2, of Kingston Court, Section 3, which adjoin the original cul-de-sac of Brentwood Court, have requested, pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the vacation of 1,325.70 square feet and 3,385.95 square feet, respectively, so as to add and combine these areas to their existing properties; and WHEREAS, the portion of the above described street or road to be vacated is more clearly indicated as “PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE CONVERTED TO A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND COMBINED WITH LOT 1 BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and “PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON BRENTWOOD COURT TO BE COMBINED WITH LOT 16 AND RETAIN A 15’ PUE BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA”, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, both dated 7-14-2009, prepared by Roanoke County Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, no other property owner will be affected by the vacation of this abandoned portion of said Brentwood Court and that its current existence imposes an impediment to the adjoining property owners making improvements to their properties adjoining this previously dedicated street; and WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and Page 2 of 5 THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 2009, and a second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on August 25, 2009. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the subject real estate (a portion of Brentwood Court, Rt. 1983, previously dedicated to public use, Plat Book 11, page 39) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate renders it unavailable for other public use. 3. That so much of this street, Brentwood Court, Route 1983, being designated and shown as “PORTION OF ROAD TO BE COMBINED W/LOT 1” on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, said portion of street being located adjacent to Lot 1, Block 3, Section No. 3 of Kingston Court (PB11, page 39), and “PORTION OF ROAD TO BE COMBINED W/LOT 16” on Exhibit “B” attached hereto, said portion of street being located adjacent to Lot 16 , Block 2, Section No. 3 of Kingston Court (PB11, page 39), in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. That a public utility easement is accepted, reserved and maintained for public purposes in the areas previously designated as “Brentwood Court” as shown on Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B”, attached hereto. 5. That the portion of the vacated street contained within the bounds designated as 1-2-3 of Exhibit “A”, containing 1,325.70 square feet, shall be added and Page 3 of 5 combined with Lot 1, Block 3, Section No. 3 , Kingston Court, Tax Map # 086.08-07- 09.02, currently the property of C. Allen & Debra L. Wilkerson. 6. That the portion of the vacated street designated at “PORTION OF ROAD TO BE COMBINED W/LOT 16” of Exhibit “B”, containing 3,385.95 square feet, shall be added and combined with Lot 16, Block 2, Section No. 3, Kingston Court, Tax Map # 086.08-07-09.01, currently the property of Michael S. & Cheryl Kirkbride. 7. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners. 8. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYES: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Page 4 of 5 cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services Billy Driver, Director of Real Estate Valuation Page 5 of 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 RESOLUTION 082509-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I – CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 25, 2009 designated as Item I – Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 2 inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of a change order for the Mudlick Creek Bridge Replacement Project for preparation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) permit application package 2. Resolution to amend the County’s Bonding Policy to add the County Administrator to and remove the Assistant County Administrator from the Bonding Committee That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors ACTION NO. A-082509-4.a____ ITEM NO. ___I-1_____________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 25, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of a change order for the Mudlick Creek Bridge Replacement Project for preparation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) permit application package SUBMITTED BY: Lon Williams, Landscape Architect/Park Planner Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: An integral element of the Mudlick Creek Stream Restoration Project is the replacement of an existing pedestrian bridge in Garst Mill Park with a new bridge that can be used by pedestrians as well as lightweight maintenance vehicles to cross Mudlick Creek. Currently, park maintenance vehicles must ford the stream in order to gain access to the other side of the park that is separated from the main portion of the park by the stream. The stream restoration plan calls for the abandonment of the stream ford and the restoration of that area once the new bridge becomes operational. The County contracted with McCormick Taylor, Engineers and Planners, for the preparation of the engineering plans for the Mudlick Creek Stream Restoration Project. In an earlier change order to this contract, McCormick Taylor prepared bridge abutment plans, conducted a hydraulic analysis associated with construction of the bridge and investigated permitting requirements with FEMA. The hydraulic analysis performed by McCormick Taylor concluded that the new bridge would result in changes to the 100-year base flood elevation. During their investigation into permitting requirements, it was determined that a recent FEMA policy change now requires that all footbridges be modeled, even if they are virtually hydraulically insignificant. Therefore, before the bridge replacement project can proceed to the construction phase, a rigorous FEMA assessment of the project must be Page 1 of 3 undertaken and the appropriate FEMA permits obtained. It is requested that the work associated with obtaining the appropriate FEMA permits be funded through a change order to the existing contract with McCormick Taylor in an amount not to exceed $30,000. McCormick Taylor, as the engineering firm of record for the Mudlick Creek Stream Restoration Project, is thoroughly familiar with this project and has played a vital role in the success that the county has achieved with this project to date. As previously noted, McCormick Taylor has prepared abutment plans for the replacement bridge, conducted a hydraulic analysis associated with construction of the bridge and investigated permitting requirements with FEMA, working outside of their scope of services in discussing with FEMA personnel how the project should go forth in compliance with current FEMA requirements. We feel that McCormick Taylor is in the right position in regard to engineering experience and expertise on the project and, fiscally speaking, to complete the project for the county in a successful and timely manner. FISCAL IMPACT: The change order under consideration would be executed for a sum not to exceed $30,000. The bridge replacement portion of the Mudlick Creek Stream Restoration Project is currently funded through a fiscal year 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) account that was established to fund improvements to Garst Mill Park, including funding support for the stream restoration project and the bridge replacement project. Adequate funding remains in this account to fund the change order that is being considered, as well as the ultimate construction of the replacement bridge. It is envisioned that no additional funding will need to be appropriated for this project. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve a change order with McCormick Taylor for a sum not to exceed $30,000 to undertake a FEMA assessment of the bridge replacement project and assist the county in obtaining the FEMA permits that are needed to allow this project to move forward in a timely manner to the construction phase. 2. Request proposals for professional engineering services from engineering firms to undertake a FEMA assessment of the bridge replacement project and assist the county in obtaining the FEMA permits that are needed to allow this project to move forward to the construction phase. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval a change order with McCormick Taylor for a sum not to exceed $30,000 to undertake a FEMA assessment of the bridge replacement project and assist the county in obtaining the FEMA permits that are needed to allow this project to move forward in a timely manner to the construction phase as indicated in Alternative 1. Page 2 of 3 VOTE: Supervisor Flora moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion Approved Yes No Absent Ms. Moore Mr. Church Mr. Flora Mr. McNamara Mr. Altizer cc: Lon Williams, Landscape Architect/Park Planner Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 3 of 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 RESOLUTION 082509-4.b TO AMEND THE COUNTY’S BONDING POLICY TO ADD THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO AND REMOVE THE ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM THE BONDING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Bonding Policy was revised and amended by resolution of the Board of Supervisors on September 9, 2008; the amended Bonding Policy established the membership of the County’s Bonding Committee as including the Assistant County Administrator responsible for development issues as well as the Director of Community Development or his designee and the County Attorney and his/her designee; and WHEREAS, the current County Administrator has reassigned management responsibilities and desires to be a member of the Bonding Committee and remove the Assistant County Administrator from this committee; and WHEREAS, the reading of this Resolution was held on August 25, 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: VI. Extensions and Rebonding of Agreements, 1. That Section paragraph D, of the Roanoke County Bonding Policy be amended and readopted as follows: “Bond extensions, agreement extensions and sureties will be reviewed by a Bonding Committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Membership shall include the Assistant County or his/her designee Administrator, the Director of Community Page 1 of 2 /her Development or his designee and the County Attorney or his/her designee.” 2. That the current County Administrator, Director of Community Development and County Attorney are hereby ratified and appointed as members of the Roanoke County Bonding Committee. 3. That this Resolution shall be in effect from its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development Philip Thompson, Deputy Director of Planning Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services Joel Baker, Building Commissioner Page 2 of 2 ACTION NO. _A-082509-5_____ ITEM NO. ____P-2___________ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 25, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: Work session on the South County Library Project and award of the construction contract for the South County Library SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Assistant County Administrator Diana Rosapepe Director of Library Services APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman, III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time is set aside to update the Board on the South County Library project. Items to be presented are: 1. Results of the construction bids for the south county library 2. Update on the library building a. Sustainable features included b. Auditorium c. Timetable 3. Update on the wetlands – new area identified 4. Merriman roundabout update a. Design status b. Funding c. Timetable 5. Pending items that need reserves for the present time 6. Balance remaining and next capital project Page 1 of 2 FISCAL IMPACT Money for the South County Library was included in the 2008 Lease Revenue Bonds, and the funds are currently available. The construction contract is well within the budget for the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION At the conclusion of the work session, staff will ask the Board to vote to award the construction contract for the South County Library to Lionberger Construction. VOTE: Supervisor Moore moved to approve the staff recommendation and award the construction contract to Lionberger Construction. Motion Approved Yes No Absent Ms. Moore Mr. Church Mr. Flora Mr. McNamara Mr. Altizer cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator Diana Rosapepe, Director of Library Services Page 2 of 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 RESOLUTION 082509-6 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETINGS UNDER ITEMS O-1 and O-2 WERE HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Moore, Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2009 RESOLUTION 082509-7 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING UNDER ITEM O-3 WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Church, Flora, McNamara, Altizer NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Moore A COPY TESTE: ___________________________________ Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board of Supervisors