Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/12/1993 - Regular~ pOAN a ~~ a~ r ,~,.~~~~ (~a~xxt#~ ~~ ~~~xx~~.~.e ROANOBE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA OCTOBER 12,1993 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth ltiresday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE A PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:00 P.M. THIS EVENING. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meeting or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that yon provide at least 48-hours notice so that prnper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call AT 3:05 P.M. HCN ARRIVED AT 3:07 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i ® R~.yaea P~e~ FM ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the Week of October 23 - 31, 1993 as Red Ribbon Week in Roanoke County. EGK MOTION TO ADOPT PROC. - URC KATIE ZAWACKI BLUE RIDGE CO SERVICES ACCEPTED PROCIAMATION ON BEHALF OF RAYSAC D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Alternatives to Fund Road Projects Eliminated by the Reduction of VDOT Revenue Sharing. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) A-101293-1 B T MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMII~NDATION URC 2. Request to Amend the Contract Governing the Roanoke County-Botetourt County Joint Library. (Spencer Watts, Library Director) A-101293-2 B T MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT URC 3. Request from the Regional Airport Commission to Amend their Agreement Reducing the Number of Enplanement Surveys. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) A-101293-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT URC 4. Approval of County-State Agreement for Industrial Access for Valley TechPark. (Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development) R-101293-4 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT 2 URC 5. Request from Delegate Cranwell for Formal Support for Regionalization of Water, Sewer, Solid Waste, Economic Development and Tourism. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) HCN MOTION TO SUPPORT REGIONALI7ATION EFFORT - NO VOTE LBE SUBST. MOTION TO APPROVE CONCEPT WITH CO G FOR 10/26 MEETING - NO VOTE B T MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL RESO IS PREPARED FOR ADOPTION IATER IN MEETING AYES-B j,EGK~LBF FM NAYS HCN E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session to Tour the Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Smith Gap Landfill, the Dixie Caverns Landfill, and the Roanoke Regional Airport. WORK SESSION SET FOR WED. 11/17 8:00 A.M. BOARD TO MEET AT RCAC AND COMPLETE TOURS BY 12:15 PM F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Declaring the Pinkard Court Recreation Center as Surplus Property and Authorizing Donation of the Facility to Total Action Against Poverty. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/26/93 URC B ~T ASI~D FOR REVERSIONARY CLAUSE Ily ORD LBE ASKED FOR CO NT FROM TAP ON USE BY 2ND READING 2. Ordinance Governing the Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates Pursuant to the Rules of the Federal Communications Commission and the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND -10/26/93 AYES-BL~,LBE,HCN,FM NAYS-EGK 3. Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of aRight-of--Way and Easement on Fort Lewis Mountain to David Shelor. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING PARR 5 IN ORD TO BE REMOVED 2ND -10/26/93 URC HCN ASKED STAFF TO BRIlVG BACK INFO TO 2ND READING ON WHAT 50 FOOT EASEMENT WOULD BE USED FOR AND 50 FEET WAS NECESSARY. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of a Temporary Grading and Construction Easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Association with the Construction of the New Forensic Lab, and to Accept a Water and Sewer Easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) 0-101293-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 4 URC I. APPO ~ S 1. Grievance Panel 2. Planning Commission B T NOMIlVATED WILLIAM TODD ROSS TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM OF RON MASSEY WHICH WILL EXPIRE DECEMBER 31. 1995. 3. Regional Cable TV Committee J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WH.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R 101293-7 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 4, 8 URC 1. Request for Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-101293-7.a R-101293-7.b 2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Firetruck Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company. A-101293-7.c 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 5 A-141293-7.d 4. Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. R-101293-7.e ECH WILL CHECK ON ENTERPRISE FUND REPORT ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND BRING BACK REPORT 5. Resolution of Support to Eliminate Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government. R-101293-7.f 6. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Valley Interstate 73 Route Alternative. R-101293-7.g 7. Acceptance of Donation of Right-of--Way for the Chester Drive Road Project. A-101293-7.h 8. Appointment of a Committee to Negotiate with Salem Cable TV Upon Terms for Renewal of their Franchise. A-101293-7.i EGK ADVISED THAT PRIVATE CITIZEN MAY SERVE ON THIS CONIlVIIZTEE K, REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: (1) Asked about determination on smolcin~ uolicv. PMM will have response by end of the week. (2) ECH described an ~ leaf collection process. ~3) Asked about meeting at Mta. Lake. Suoe sor Minnix responded under his comments. Supervisor Nickens: Asked if Salem can extend their water and sewer lines into the County. ECH advised they have extended water and sewer lines in the past and he will check under what condition they have done so. Supervisor Tohnson: Advised that one of the residents in his district expressed concern about the ne~ahve campaign tactics used by those running for office and asked that her comments be passed on. Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Attended the Polo Match and thon~ht the event was successful. Complimented TMC and ECH on the condition o the 6 Meld at Green Hill Park. ~2) Rece ~l a np4rt ~*~ TiVIC on the sue. of the Pow Wow held at Green HiII Park. Snp eivisor Minnie Re uorted on the m eeting he and ECH attended st Mountain Lake s..ponsored by the New Centn rv Council L. CITIZENS' C011~IlViEEIVTS AND COD~IlVIUNICATIONS M. REPORTS B T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORTS FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF ITEM 6 - UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability Pere Investments and Portfolio: Policy, as of August 31,1990 6. Report on Refinancing a portion of the 1991 Water Revenue Bonds. ITEM D-5 ~COriTIlVUED FROM NEW BUSINESS) 5. RecLuest firom Delegate Cranwell for Formal Sunnort for Regionalization of Water. Sewer, Solid Waste. Eeouomic Development and Tourism. Elmer C. Hodge. an .Administrator) R 101293-5 BL1 MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM D-5 FROM THE TABLE AT 4:30 P.M. EGK MOTION TO ADOPT RESO SUPPORTING REGIONALIZATION AND TO INCLUDE IN LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE. URC N, SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia. Section 2.1-344 A (5) to discuss a prospective business or industry; and (7) for consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members pertaining to probably litlgat~wn, Boone, Beasley v. County of Roanoke. EGK MOTION TO GO INTO E ~ SESSION AT 4:30 P.M. URC O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-101293-8 B T MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO - URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.1 P. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES AND SECOND READING OF 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the ~7~ning Classification of Roanoke Count Tax Parcel ers 96.02-Ol-Ol, 96.02-1-2, a portion of 97.01-2-17 (South of the Blue Ridge Parkway), a Portion of 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Excluding the Critical Area) and 97.03-2-5 from AG-1 to AR and to Amend the Zoning Classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.07-1-6 and a Portion of 96.02-1-46 (North of the Blne- Ridge Parkway, Excluding the Critical Area) from AG-1 to R-1. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoufng) 0-101293-9 LBE MOTION TO DEFER ACTION TO 10/26 TO IitEVI~Y A PRELIlVIINARY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AND C:HEt~° THE BOUNDARY OF THE CRITICAL VIEWSHEDS - NO VOTE s HCN c~~~r[~' MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-B~T.EG~ NAYS-LBE.FIV O~.r~~"IT' DEC'~F N'IT'H 8001NE, BOONS dL LOEB LBE SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO DEFER ACTION UNTIL BOARD CAN SEE FINAj~ WRI+1'I'EN CONSENT DECREE AYES-LBE NAYS-BL J,EGK,HCN,~'M B T MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY A11'ORNEY TO EXECUI~ TIC CONSENT DECREE TO SETTLE IAW SUiT WITH BOO BOONS & LOEB. AYES-BIT E,_GK,HCN1~'M NAYS LBE Q. CITIZEN COINIlVIENTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE R:- AD,TO TO 2P.NI ON OC'hOBER 26,1993. BLT MOTION TO AWOURN AT 9:45 P.M. URC 9 o~ ROAN ~.~ ti ' p Z 2 a 1838 ,~ff~~,~ C~~~x~~~ ~~ ~.~~xx~~C~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA OCTOBER 12,1993 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE A PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:00 P.M. THIS EVENING. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meeting or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that yon provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Location: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND i ® Recycled Paper AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the Week of October 23 - 31, 1993 as Red Ribbon Week in Roanoke County. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Alternatives to Fund Road Projects Eliminated by the Reduction of VDOT Revenue Sharing. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 2. Request to Amend the Contract Governing the Roanoke County-Botetourt County Joint Library. (Spencer Watts, Library Director) 3. Request from the Regional Airport Commission to Amend their Agreement Reducing the Number of Enplanement Surveys. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Approval of County-State Agreement for Industrial Access for Valley TechPark. (Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development) 5. Request from Delegate Cranwell for Formal Support for Regionalization of Water, Sewer, Solid Waste, Economic Development and Tourism. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session to Tour the Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Smith Gap Landfill, the Dixie Caverns Landfill, and the Roanoke Regional Airport. F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Request for Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Firetruck Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 4. Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. 5. Resolution of Support to Eliminate Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government. 6. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Valley Interstate 73 Route Alternative. 7. Acceptance of Donation of Right-of--Way for the Chester Drive Road Project. 8. Appointment of a Committee to Negotiate with Salem Cable TV Upon Terms for Renewal of their Franchise. K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' COD~IlVIENTS AND COb~IlVIiJ1VICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Declaring the Pinkard Court Recreation Center as Surplus Property and Authorizing Donation of the Facility to Total Action Against Poverty. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 2. Ordinance Governing the Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates Pursuant to the Rules of the Federal Communications Commission and the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) 3. Ordinance Authorizing the Corneyance of aRight-of--Way and Easement on Fort Lewis Mountain to David Shelor. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Corneyance of a Temporary Grading and Construction Easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Association with the Construction of the New Forensic Lab, and to Accept a Water and Sewer Easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel 2. Planning Commission 3. Regional Cable TV Committee J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA 3 N. O. P. Q• R. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Fund Proclamations Signed by the Chairman Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability Per Irnestments and Portfolio Policy, as of August 31, 1993. Report on Refinancing a portion of the 1991 Water Revenue Bonds. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoning Classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.02-Ol-Ol, 96.02-1-2, a portion of 97.01-2-17 (South of the Blue Ridge Parkway), a Portion of 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Excluding the Critical Area) and 97.03-2-5 from AG-1 to AR and to Amend the Zoning Classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.07-1-6 and a Portion of 96.02-1-46 (North of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Excluding the Critical Area) from AG-1 to R-1. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIiJNICATIONS ADJOitRNMENT TO 2:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 26, 1993. 5 ~' Roanoke Area Youth Substance Abuse Coalition P.O. t3oz 1 ~7~+~ Roanoke, ~~a. ?-tU~~ ~-O3) 9H2-1-- ~- Executive Committee Stuart Israel Chairman MEMO T0: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: RAYSAC Members DATE: September 24, 1993 RE: Red Ribbon Week Thank you for agreeing to recognize Red Ribbon Week as part of the Board of Supervisors commitment to a drug free community. We appreciate your issuing the resolution at your October 12th meeting. Mrs. Katie Zawacki, Prevention Specialist for Blue Ridge Community Services, Prevention Plus+, will be there to accept this recognition on our behalf. The RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN was initiated in 1985 by the Virginia Federation of Communities for Drug- Free Youth following the murder of Federal Agent Enrique Camarena by drug traffickers. The red ribbon was designated as the symbol of intolerance of illegal drug use and a commitment to a drug- free life style. This year the last week of October has been designated as the annual National Red Ribbon Week. During this week many communities across the United States conduct special Red Ribbon ceremonies, rallies, contests, and other activities. Steven D. Goodwin Mice Chairman RAYSAC is excited about promoting Red Ribbon Week, in the Roanoke Valley, October 23-31, as an star}~ (raven Parker excellent way to demonstrate our commitment to a secrecar~~/Treasurer drug free community . We have compi 1 ed some information and suggestions regarding various ways of making the alcohol and other drug free theme visible in our schools, churches, businesses and community at large during this week. We see t'~.is as a great opportunity for you to help sponsor a special event, disseminate information, arrange for a speaker and/or make other plans which will highlight Red Ribbon Week. RAYSAC looks forward to continuing to work together to promote the Roanoke Valley as a drug free community. 4AYSA~, L'- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 23-31, 1993 AS RED RIBBON WEER IN SUPPORT OF A DRUG FREE COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the Red Ribbon Campaign was initiated in 1985 by the Virginia Federation of Communities for Drug-Free Youth; and WHEREAS, the red ribbon was designated as the symbol of intolerance of illegal drug use and a commitment to a drug-free life style; and WHEREAS, a group of concerned citizens, parents, students, teachers, police officers, business people, judges and other caring individuals have established the Roanoke Area Youth Substance Abuse Coalition (RAYSAC) to bring better coordination and development of substance abuse prevention programs and resources; and WHEREAS, RAYSAC is promoting the Red Ribbon Campaign in the Roanoke Valley through a variety of activities and has asked that the Board of Supervisors recognize Red Ribbon Week in Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia do hereby proclaim October 23 through October 31, 1993 as RED RIBBON WEER in Roanoke County, Virginia, and encourage all of our citizens to join in the observances and activities of this event. ACTION NO. A-101293-1 ITEM NUMBER '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Alternatives to Fund Road Projects Eliminated by the Reduction of VDOT Revenue Sharing. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has been notified by the Virginia Department of Transportation that our Supplemental Revenue Sharing Match has been reduced from $200,000 to $172,600 for a total allocation including VDOT's match of $345,200. As a result of this reduction, four projects have been eliminated from the Priority List. They are Buckland Mill Road, Drake Circle, Irondale Circle and Bradshaw Road. Buckland Forest Roads: Buckland Mill Road has been in need of repair for several years. The residents in the Buckland Forest area have been meeting with staff for two years to try to upgrade their roads to plant mix and complete the necessary repairs to Buckland Mill Road. They have committed to raising the matching share of funds to improve these roads, and have raised $4,000 of $13,100 needed for their share. They have been advised that their roads have been removed from the revenue sharing priority list and are very disappointed. There are several methods available to complete repair of these roads: 1. The residents could wait and see if there are funds available in this year's incidental construction fund. If these funds are used, it would be late 1994 or early 1995 before construction begins. This method would not require a match from the residents. 2. The residents could continue to raise the funds. Staff believes there will be sufficient savings from the 35 other revenue sharing projects to accomplish these projects. This would require us to wait until the other projects are ~i completed or are far enough along to determine the savings. If there are insufficient savings from the revenue sharing projects, staff could come back to the Board to request funds for the remaining balance. 4. The area residents could wait until next year's revenue sharing program takes place. Staff will be addressing this with the Board in the spring of 1994. Bradshaw Road Culvert This is a Roanoke Valley Resource Authority problem and could be constructed using Resource Authority Funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the residents continue to raise their share of the funds for Buckland Mill Road, Drake Circle, and Irondale Circle. The County would match their share with savings from the other revenue sharing projects. If additional funds are necessary, staff will come back to the Board for consideration at that time. Staff recommends that the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority be encouraged to fund the entire Bradshaw Road culvert project at an approximate cost of $22,000. -rn.a/ ~ Elmer C. odge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendation Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT John Hubbard, CEO, RVRA ~i-i COUNTY OF ROANOKE ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 772-2080 MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering~,~ & Inspections SUBJ: Supplemental Revenue Sharing for FY 92-93 DATE: September 23, 1993 Jeff Echols has informed me that Roanoke County's Supplemental Revenue Sharing Match has been reduced from $200,000 to $172,600 for a total allocation including VDOT's match of $345,200. This means that the following projects: (a) Project #4 Franklin Road, the County's contribution of $25,000 is reduced to $22,600. (b) Projects #5, Buckland Mill Road, #6, Drake Circle, #7, Irondale Circle and #8, Bradshaw Road will have to be eliminated from the adopted prioritized list. If you have any questions, please let me know. dj Attachment ~- I WZCZ^ ~ ~ Z \ y I N I ti I p I p I r ? I Z r ~ p I p I p I I I ~ ? Z i-- -i- ---F . F-- - -i- i- ..I 0=~o 30~ z Qlplpl>~II ~ z z III O o ~ ~~ ~ I ~ I (~ T ~~ i I " W ~ W ~ I X I I I I X I X W I OW rZ o =r ~ Q' V1 cp Z S~ d I I an I I N sr fr Nr I I ~r~ V Q O W 3m NN d 1'^ I N J~0 NV JW JN QN N^ CJ ~.p J~D C"' a^ pU Z~ I I ~O I ! ZN Z Z .. L.. T - ~ -I ~ ' I ar°Z a~w > > r r I r ~ Y I r I r - I~ 0 ~o~ z I z I z z I z I z I z I z ~ > ... w < I ~~ ~ ~ I Q U t/1 ~ ~ ~ r r = C~ -• - I y - - N r y -- N~ 1 -T ~~ T'- T Q W (n 2 W ~`' a m I m I N I N I ~ I ~ I .. I m ~ ~ WU~ ~ ~ W ~p~ 1 Z ~ z O ~ W Z 4 3 3 pvpC~ N~Nm ^ ^ NH I I ~ I ~ I I W W ¢ pN IJJ p~Nii WJ.rJ I ~"' I ~ ~ O W W W ~ O ~ ~ °N°N WW?W ZW =W W W WWKJ o~o~ ~~or ~rpr ~r°r ~rp~ W W K K C' KpK 0-'2(J . D ~ ~7 JW ~~U ~rW-~r KU~ C2pr °~ ° O~ I U l l l l I ~~py ~ W r z r ~ l I z° ~ p Woro I = Y O~ ~o^ I I I I I ° I m I }. O Q Q L~ Z Z~ Q Z D ~'v ~ ~ °- o ~D N ~ l '7 f ~-- -}- ~ ~ I I N N _ ~ ~ Cn ~ ~ x zap ~ I ~ o~ o I o ~o ~ o I 1 ~ ~ o ~o~ o J ~ J O_ _1 W J C p' } I = I > I I I >' I Y I Z I I I In ~~z Y Y N _ c ~¢~ ¢ ~¢~ a I a ~¢~ ¢ °_ ~ Ja a? ~ ? ~ ? I Z ? Z - ? ~ Z- ? - t -- - --t t~ t t t 1 G.-. o I c I c ( c I o I c I °o I o° I c ~ C I{-- ~ - ~ ~ --Ij- I L I I J O W Q N F}- 7 v 0°o I o°o I °oo I c I °oo o ~ ~ ~ N I °o I °o I °o I e ... N ~ ~ } U Z U I I I I I I I I U U W {- ~ ~ I ~ ~ Nw ~~_ 2~ H°II~I~I~ ZOO mJN Pq~O ° o N.J.m I I I I I I~I~I NUN N ~D N N I I I I ~ZQ a~m NJ~ ~aW nWW GrW oQH =~ ^~~ ~~ m ~ mNZ p N~~ ~2W NQFW- aaa ~~~ o~y O I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-. IN Ir7 I ~ I~ I~ I~ ~°~ ~ I I ~~ ACTION NO. A-101293-2 ITEM NUMBER "" G~'i, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for an amendment to the terms of the contract governing the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 1986 contract which established the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library contains provisions for the allocation of continuing operations costs between the two localities. The original terms of the contract call for a decennial review of the allocation of costs following each census. Costs are to be apportioned based on facility usage or size of service area. The Botetourt County Board of Supervisors, acting on an earlier recommendation made by the Joint Library Committee, has voted in favor of conducting a usage study in FY 1995-1996 instead of waiting until FY 2000-2001. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, if it agrees with the Botetourt County action, needs to formally endorse the change in the terms of the original contract. Any resultant recommended cost adjustments would be subject to the approval of the respective governing bodies. BACKGROUND: The original terms of the Joint Library contract established a 50$ cost sharing arrangement between the two localities. Section Three of the contract provides for regular adjustments of the operating cost allocations based primarily on the usage levels of the joint facility by the citizens of the respective localities. Original terms of the contract mandated an adjustment review following every Federal Census of the population. Although size of the service area is also mentioned as a possible cost allocation factor, in practice this has not been used. It appears that designation of the decennial review was principally a matter of convenience. The original 50~ division of costs was adjusted in FY 92/93 to a 25$ share for Roanoke County based on usage studies conducted in 1990 and 1991. The Joint Library Committee, which by contract is charged with collecting and analyzing cost allocation data and recommending adjustments, also recommended that the process be repeated in 1995/1996. It was felt that ten years is a long period to be locked into an allocation ~-~. 2 agreement b that a five assessment established on annually year. ased on a relatively short period's survey data, and year period would result in a fairer and more accurate process. It is perhaps noteworthy that the newly Chesterfield County -Richmond City joint library relies collected usage data to formulate cost allocations each FISCAL IMPACT: Increased frequency of cost allocation review could possibly lead to an accelerated increase in Roanoke County's financial obligation to support the Joint Library. As an example, if usage levels by Roanoke County residents were to rise by an increment of 5$ to a proportion of 30$, our current year's funding obligation would rise from $30,724 to $36,869. By the same token, a decline of 5$ would save the County approximately $6,145 per year. The library staff, at this time, thinks that it is highly unlikely that the usage rates would change by more than 5$ in either direction. The library staff also believes that given the current growth rates of Botetourt's population within the Joint Library's service area, and the prevailing commuter patterns within the Roanoke County sections of the service area, it is probable that Roanoke County's citizens' proportionate usage would either remain stable or decrease. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Leave the current contract agreement intact, which preserves the County's obligation at 25$ until after the year 2000; risk of possibly higher costs is avoided, but so is the possibility of lower costs. 2) Request more frequent (ie., annual or biennial) assessments of usage and adjustment of costs. 3) Act to revoke or substantially rewrite the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Library staff recommend that the Board agree to allow the Joint Library Committee to conduct a usage study and to propose suggested cost allocations in FY 95/96. The Board of Trustees has reviewed this suggestion and also supports this course. The Board of Supervisors would remain free to accept or reject the Joint Library Committee's suggestions. Respectfully submitted, Approved by ~,.._-~ ~ 1 c~ 0 Spe cer Watts Elm r C. Hodge Library Director County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No to approve staff recommendation cc. File pencer Watt , ~ P ~_~-?ctor. ~ J.i_brary Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Yes Abs x x x x ~~ ACTION NO. A-101293-3 ITEM NO. ~ .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve an Amendment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,,,,/ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This amendment would reduce the number of passenger enplane- ment surveys from six (6) per year to two (2) per year. BACKGROUND' Section 15(b) of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract provides that the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shall conduct six surveys per fiscal year to determine the number of County passengers enplaning at the Airport. The contract provides that the County shall make certain payments to the Commission based upon certain airport services and facilities being provided to County residents. These surveys are used to determine the number of County residents receiving such services. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The airport commission staff believes that semi-annual surveys would be more than sufficient for determining the number of County passengers using the airport. As Jacqueline L. Shuck stated in her letter of September 24, 1993, "Historically, the number of County passengers far exceeds the minimum required to support the County's $264,640 annual payment. In fact, use by County residents or businesses has substantially exceeded the minimum percentage of approximately 1.76 in every one of the thirty-seven surveys conducted thus far." Attached for Board consideration is the letter from Ms. Shuck and the draft amendment. FISCAL IMPACTS' Each survey costs approximately $600.00 to perform. This amendment would eliminate 4 surveys annually, saving approximately $2400 per year. ~..s~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the County Administrator to execute the First Amendment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract on behalf of the County. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Harry C' NickPn~ Denied ( ) to a~nrovP sa-=_ff ra~nmman~a inn Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x to Nickens x Minnix x general/airport.rep cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 5202 Aviation Drive Airport Commission ~ ~ Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2-1 1 48 Bob L, Johnson, Chairman (703) 362-1999 Kit B. Kiser, Vice Chairman FAX (703) 563-4838 W. Robert Herbert H. Odell Minnix Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director September 24, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge, County Administration County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 lvlr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Room 364, Roanoke Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S . W . Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Elmer and Bob: Raava~ RC-GIaVAL aR~oar In response to Elmer's letter of August 27, 1993, please be advised that the bimonthly passenger enplanement survey is conducted in accordance with Section 15 (b) of the contract between the City, County and Commission. Although the contract specifies that there shall be six surveys per year, members of my staff feel that quarterly surveys are all that we need for our market information and that semi-annual surveys would be more than sufficient for determining the number of County passengers using the airport. Historically, the number of County passengers far exceeds the minimum required to support the County's $264,640 annual payment. In fact, use by County residents or businesses has substantially exceeded the minimum percentage of approximately 1.76 % in every one of the thirty-seven surveys conducted thus far. Since each survey costs us approximately $600.00 to perform, I think it would be beneficial to the Commission if the agreement were amended to reduce the number of enplanement surveys conducted each year. I have taken the liberty of having a draft prepared of a possible amendment. Please let me know whether City Council and the County Board of Supervisors are interested in pursuing this, and whether the amendment, as drafted, is acceptable. Very truly yours, Ja queline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp Enclosure cc: Commission Members csp092493.h jls\survey D ~ GI ff u' -y-3 First Amendment To Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION CONTRACT is entered into this day of , 1993, by and between the CITY OF ROANOKE, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "City", ROANOKE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPCRT COi~fISSION, a body corporate, hereinafter referred to as "Commission"; W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, by Contract dated January 28, 1987, ("Contract"), City, County, and Commission intended to effectuate the purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Act, (Chapter 140, 1986 Acts of Assembly "Acts"); WHEREAS, pursuant to section 26 of the Act, section 15 of the Contract calls for the County to make certain payments to the Commission based upon Roanoke Regional Airport ("Airport") services and facilities provided to County residents by Commission, determined in such reasonable manner as the parties may agree; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to section 15(b) of the Contract, the parties agreed to determine the number of County passengers enplaning at the Airport by six surveys per fiscal year conducted by Commission; and, WHEREAS, the results of all such past surveys have consistently, and without exception, demonstrated that six surveys are unnecessary to fulfill the intention of the parties under the Contract regarding the number of County passengers enplaning at the airport; and, __ r-- ~ , rr __ ~ J i_~ V u ~'V :J v WHEREAS, conducting six such surveys expensive and burdensome to the Commission; and, ~~ s is unnecessarily WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend section 15(b) of the Contract to reduce the number of passenger surveys required under the Contract to be conducted by the Commission from six to two surveys per fiscal year. THEREFORE, in exchange for the following covenants and agreements and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, the City, County, and Commission covenant and agree as follows: 1. Section 15 (b) of the Contract is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: (b) "County passenger" as used in subsection (a) of this section shall have reference to any enplaning passenger at the Airport (1) who has his place of residence in the County or the Town of Vinton; (2) who, regardless of place of residence, is on business or professional travel representing or on behalf of any corporation, firm or other business entity or person located in the County or the Town of Vinton; or (3) who, regardless of place of residence, is on business or professional travel for the purpose of doing or conducting business with or calling upon any corporation, firm, or other business entity or person located in the County or the Town of Vinton. The number of "County passengers" per fiscal year shall be determined by surveys conducted by_the Commission. The Commission shall conduct :<i~~~~? si;;....surveys. _per • ~ ..::>::.:...;>:::::.:<::.::. <:::::.Ezraad:>:f~am::'ax~:~::.<~ ::~x~c~:~. _:.: fiscal year . a~~.:;dur3~g>:.~~~:.::P;;:.;:.;:.:;;:>;:::.;;:_ :<.;:.;:.;;:.;:.>:.;:.;:.: ~::.;:.;:.:;~.;..: :.;:. ~:.; Each survey shall cover one full calendar day (twenty- four hours), and each survey shall be conducted on a different day of the week. On the basis of the sr~ surveys, the Commission shall determine the percentage of County passengers among the total number of passengers surveyed. This percentage shall be multiplied by the total number of enplaning passengers at the Airport (as determined from official FAA statistics available from the most recent twelve month accounting period) to determine the total number of County passengers for the fiscal year. The total number of County passengers for the fiscal year shall be multiplied by fifty dollars 2 '~i h ' ' r-; C -] ($50.00), or such subsequent amount as may be determined by CPI adjustment pursuant to Exhibit H, to determine the County service payment under this section. 2. Except and unless expressly amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 3. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. WITNESS, the following signatures and seals as of the date first written above. ATTEST: By: ATTEST: By: ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION By: Jacqueline Shuck Executive Director CITY OF ROANOKE By: Title: Title: Cathy Pendleton Commission Secretary Date: 3 ~-- ~ •~ J I! I i Cl "1 ,, ,, ~ ~ ~I (LL~, ' I ~' V U J U ATTEST: By: COUNTY OF ROANOKE By: Title: Title: Date: eir\contrcts\commxl .amd msw 9-17-93 ~-3 4 Item No . "" ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of County-State Agreement for Industrial Access relating to Valley TechPark COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the Board's January 1993 request for industrial access funds for Valley TechPark on July 24, 1993. This approval came with contingencies that appear in the form of a contract referred to as a County-State Agreement. BACRGROUND• The 1992 citizen approved bond referendum included $750,000 for the development of Valley TechPark. The magnitude of this project requires that these bond funds be leveraged against state and federal grant funds. The first such leveraged funds were awarded in January 1993 by the Department of Housing and Community Development for preliminary environmental and engineering reports. (At the same time, the Board requested $450,000 in industrial access funds from the Virginia Department of Transportation.) Contracts were awarded to HDH and T. P. Parker & Sons, respectively. Additionally, the firm of T. P. Parker & Sons was awarded a contract to prepare the necessary construction plans and engineering reports necessary to receive Virginia Department of Transportation approval. As noted, the Board approved a request for industrial access funds in January 1993. This request of the Commonwealth Transportation Board was held until July 24, 1993, when necessary supporting documents prepared by the staff of T. P. Parker & Sons could be submitted. While the Transportation Board approved this request, contingencies were attached to this approval. These contingencies in the form of the County-State Agreement require the County to provide for right of ways, utility adjustments, project design approval, permits, necessary surety documents for $450,000, matching funds of $150,000, and ultimately, a qualifying industry as well as a promise to bear all costs in excess of $600,000. Additionally, the County-State Agreement stipulates that the Virginia Department of Transportation will arrange for and manage the construction of the project. D-4 Before the Virginia Department of Transportation can advertise this project, the Board must approve the County-State Agreement, authorize the staff to provide the Virginia Department of Transportation with an appropriate bond or surety device not to exceed $450,000 and approve the payment of $150,000 to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the County's necessary match amount. A copy of the appropriate agreement is attached and has been reviewed by the County Attorney. In addition to Board action, final design plans including profiles, quantities, and construction plans must be submitted in a timely fash~_on by the staff of T. P. Parker & Sons for this project to be bid this month. FISCAL IMPACT• Roanoke County has the opportunity to leverage $150,000 of bond funds to obtain $450,000 in industrial access funds. The total estimated cost of this phase of the industrial access road construction project is $1,110,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. Approval of the attached resolution and execution of the County-State Agreement which includes the surety bond and payment of $150,000 to the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. Authorization of appropriate officials to sign the County- State Agreement. Respectfully submitted: Approved: l.~/. Tim thy W. Gubala, Director Elmer C. Hodge Economic Development Department County Administrator --------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred Minnix to Nickens Attachment ~-~ ROANOKE COUNTY Project 0830-080-294, M501 Industrial Access Valley TechPark THIS AGREEMENT made this day of 1993, by and between Roanoke County, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, party of the first part, and the Virginia Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT, party of the second part; and THAT WHEREAS, the COUNTY, by appropriate resolution, requested industrial access funds to assist in providing suitable access to Valley TechPark, located off Route 11; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board has, subject to certain contingencies, allocated an amount not to exceed $450,000 from the Industrial Access Fund to assist in providing access to the proposed industrial park, such being designated as Project 0830-080-294, M501; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY hereby acknowledges and agrees to the contingencies of this allocation, as set forth in the June 24, 1993, resolution of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, which is made a part of this agreement by reference; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto mutually desire to contribute towards the construction of the access road. ~-~ NOW, THEREFORE, Witness that for and in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. The COUNTY will: 1. Acquire the necessary right of way and any required slope and/or drainage easements for this project at no cost to the DEPARTMENT. Perform, or have performed, all environmental assessments, and, should these assessments require any form of mitigation as a condition of the project's construction on the proposed right of way, provide said mitigation at no cost to the DEPARTMENT. 2. Cause any utilities in conflict with the construction of this project be adjusted at no cost to the DEPARTMENT. 3. Arrange for the design of Project 0830-080-294, M501. This design shall be in accordance with the geometric standards of the DEPARTMENT and shall include a pavement width of 24 feet within an unrestricted right of way width of not less than 50 feet. The plans shall specifically designate each contract item as either eligible or ineligible for Industrial Access Funds. The design of this project is not an eligible project cost. 2 ~-~ 4. 4. Prepare any required environmental documents and secure all necessary local, state and federal permits required for the proposed construction at no cost to the DEPARTMENT. Provide the DEPARTMENT with an appropriate bond or other acceptable surety device, not to exceed $450,000 and terminating on or after July 24, 1996. Such surety device shall provide for reimbursement to the DEPARTMENT of any expenses incurred by the Industrial Access Fund in this project's construction not justified by the eligible industrial capital outlay of the eligible industry or industries served by the project, as of June 24, 1993. Pursuant to contingency 2 (e) of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's resolution of June 24, 1993, eligibility. of the industry or industries, the amount of eligible industrial capital outlay and the extent of the project's eligibility for industrial access funds shall be as determined by the DEPARTMENT, in cooperation with the Department of Economic Development. The basis for this determination shall be the application of the DEPARTMENT'S policy and its usual practices for administering the Industrial Access Fund, based on documentary evidence submitted by the COUNTY. The amount of the surety device shall be determined by 3 ~-`~ 5 6. the DEPARTMENT prior to project advertisement. Reimbursement, if required, shall be made prior to termination of the surety device, upon demand. This surety device may be released at an earlier date subject to the DEPp,RTMENT's receipt of suitable documentation that the location and eligible capital outlay of qualified industrial development in operation along said project warrants the industrial access funds expended on this project's construction. For any qualifying capital outlay of less than $6,000,000, the DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed in the amount of the Industrial Access Funds authorized for this project, less 10% of up to $3,000,000 of documented qualified outlay of the industry (s) and 5% of between $3,000,000 and $6,000,000 of documented qualifying capital outlay of the industry(s). Provide the surety device immediately upon notification by the DEPARTMENT and prior to the advertisement of the project for competitive bids. Pay to the DEPARTMENT, immediately upon request and prior to the advertisement of the project for competitive bids, the $150,000 of required matching funds . 7. Bear all eligible costs in excess of $600,000 and any ineligible costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT in 4 ~-ti administering the project's design and construction. Such reimbursement shall be provided within 30 days of the receipt of appropriate billing by the DEPARTMENT. B. The DEPARTMENT will: 1. Arrange for the construction of Project 0830-080- 294, M501 described as the construction of approximately 0.38 mile of new roadway in a southeastern direction from its intersection with Route 11 for the purpose of providing suitable access within the aforementioned industrial park. 2. Notify the COUNTY as to the amount of the necessary surety device pursuant to Item A (4) and request payment of the $150,000 COUNTY matching construction prior to the advertisement of the project for bids. 3. Authorize expenditure of the Industrial Access Fund allocation, in accordance with and subject to the limitations and contingencies of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's resolution of June 24, 1993, for the cost of the project's eligible items and related engineering activities. 4. Upon completion of the project, submit a supplemental billing or reimbursement to the COUNTY, as may be appropriate, for any difference 5 D-`f between the estimated and actual cost of construction of the project. Reimbursement shall be provided within thirty (30) days of receipt of appropriate billing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, the parties of this agreement have hereunto affixed their signatures, Roanoke County on the day of 1993, and the Virginia Department of Transportation on the day of 1993. APPROVED AS TO FORM County Attorney ATTEST: ROANOKE COUNTY County Administrator Chairman, Board of Supervisors NOTE: Any official signing for and on behalf of a municipality or political subdivision should attache a certified copy of order, resolution, ordinance or charter provision, or a citation to statute, under the authority of which this agreement is executed. 6 ~-4 ATTEST: Title: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Deputy Commissioner APPROVED Fiscal Division (VDOT) s/ DATE: Office of Attorney General s/ DATE: 7 „~ ... LAC AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF COUNTY- STATE AGREEMENT FOR INDUSTRIAL ACCESS RELATING TO VALLEY TECHPARK WHEREAS, Title 33.1-221, Code of Virginia, provides for the availability of state industrial access funds for implementing approved improvements to public streets to enhance and promote industrial development and continued public safety along public streets; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is desirous of developing Valley Techpark for the purpose of job creation for the citizens of both the Roanoke and New River Valleys; and WHEREAS, the citizens approved the November 1992 bond referendum of which $750,000 was earmarked for the development of Valley Techpark; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved $450,00 for the purpose of constructing an industrial access road at Valley Techpark; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will cause to construct an industrial road of .38 miles in length; and Whereas, Roanoke County agrees to reimburse VDOT for expenses over $450,000; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County agrees to the contingencies outlined in the County-State Agreement for Valley Techpark and referred to as Project 0830-080-294,M501 by VDOT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby recommend that Roanoke County enter into the County-State Agreement for Valley Techpark and authorizes the Appropriate County officials to sign said agreement. t ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLIITION 101293-5 SUPPORTING DELEGATE CRANWELL~S EFFORTS FOR REGIONALIZATION OF WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM WHEREAS, recent polls in the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County clearly reflect the desire of City and County residents to merge various services; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1993, Delegate Richard Cranwell convened a meeting of area elected officials and business leaders to discuss regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism marketing; and WHEREAS, Delegate Richard Cranwell, at that meeting, offered to lead a legislative effort to obtain state funds which would be used to support regionalization and/or as incentives; and WHEREAS, these efforts by Delegate Cranwell and other members of the Legislature are appreciated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports Delegate Cranwell's proposal to initiate legislation that will provide financial incentives to local governments for regionalization of various services; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County respectively requests all local governing bodies to support this legislative initiative as being in the best interest of the entire region. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution and L 7 include in the legislative package, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J~. Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, Virginia House of Delegates Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator Roanoke Area Legislators - State ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER / """ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Delegate Cranwell for Formal Support of Regionalization of Water, Sewer, Solid Waste, Economic Development and Tourism. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On September 21, 1993, a meeting was held involving elected officials and business leaders in the Roanoke Valley to discuss potential areas for future cooperation. If such a regional effort could be realized, State legislators attending the meeting also offered to introduce legislation returning a portion of state monies to the local governments for a certain period of years. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a letter from Delegate Cranwell written to the elected officials of the Counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, the Town of Vinton, and the Cities of Salem and Roanoke requesting that these governing bodies take formal action on their position regarding the regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism. He further requested that this action take place by October 15, 1993. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has advocated a cooperative regional approach to these issues for many years. They invited the other local governments to participate in the Spring Hollow Reservoir project prior to construction. Additionally, they have frequently suggested that there be one regional economic development office rather than separate departments in each locality competing against each other. The Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce has adopted the attached resolution supporting Delegate Cranwell's efforts at regionalization, and requesting that all local governments support the effort also. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors express support for regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development -~ and tourism. Staff further recommends support of any effort by the General Assembly to financially assist local governments by the rebating of certain state taxes. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens C. RICHARD CRANWELL P.O. !O% 479 VINTON. VIRGINIA 24179 M AJORITV FLOOR LEADER FOURTEENTH DISTRICT City of Salem: September 28, 1993 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES ~~ C /'~'' RICHMOND Hon. James E. Taliaferro, Mayor City of Salem P. O. Box 869 Salem, VA 24153 W. Mac Green, Vice Mayor City of Salem P. O. Box 869 Salem, VA 24153 Carl E. Tarpley, Jr. Member, Salem City Council P. O. Box 869 Salem, VA 24153 Alexander M. Brown Member, Salem City Council P. O. Box 869 Salem, VA 24153 Howard C. Packett Member, Salem City Council P. O. Box 869 Salem, VA 24153 Town of Vinton: Hon. Charles R. Hill, Mayor Town of Vinton 622 Olney Road Vinton, VA 24179 Donald L. Davis Vinton Town Council 1031 Halliahurst Ave. Vinton, VA 24179 Roy G. McCarty, Jr. Vinton Town Council 450 Jackson Ave. Vinton, VA .24179 C. Buford Barton Vinton Town Council 1515 Mountain View Road Vinton, VA 24179 Joseph L. Bush, Jr. Vinton Town Council 855 E. Washington Ave. Vinton, V 24179 Roanoke County: ~~k< 1 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: FINANCE (CHAIRMAN/ COURTS OF JUSTICE COUNTIES, CITIES AND TOWNS RULES Hon. H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Lee B. Eddy, Vice-Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Bob L. Johnson, Member Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Member Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 J~-5 September 28, 1993 Page two Harry C. Nickens, Member Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Roanoke City: Hon. David A. Bowers, Mayor City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr., City of Roanoke 10-27th Street, S.E. Roanoke, VA 24014 Howard E. Musser, Member Roanoke City Council 110 Mountain Ave., S.W., Apt. 3 Roanoke, Va 24016 William White, Sr., Member Roanoke City Council 3698 Partridge Lane, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24017 Botetourt County: Vice Mayor R. E. Layman, Jr., Chairman Botetourt County Boazd of Supervisors 1 West Main Street-Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 Mrs. Elizabeth T. Bowles, Member Roanoke City Council 3637 Grandview Ave., N.W. Roanoke, VA 24012 James G. Harvey, II, Member Roanoke City Council 1904 Westover Ave., S.W. Roanoke, VA 24015 Delvis O. "Mac" McCadden, Member Roanoke City Council 325 Noble Ave., N.E. Roanoke, VA 24012 W. G. Loope, Vice-Chairman Botetourt County Board of Supervisors 1 West Main Street-Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 W. E. Booze, Jr., Member Botetourt County Board of Supervisors 1 West Main Street-Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 G. C. Thompson, Jr., Member Botetourt County Boazd of Supervisors 1 West Main Street-Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 Wanda C. Wingo, Member Botetourt County Board of Supervisors 1 West Main Street-Box 1 Fincastle, VA 24090 ~s October 2, 1993 Page three John M. Stroud Roanoke Valley Chamber of Commerce 310 First Street, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Tom Robertson, President Roanoke Valley Business Council c/o Carillon Health Systems P. O. Box 13367 Roanoke, VA 24033 Alan Soltis, President Botetourt County Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 81 Fincastle, VA 24090 Ladies and Gentlemen: Steve Smeltzer, President Salem/Rke. Co. Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 832 Salem, VA 24153 James C. Reynolds, President Vinton Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 558 Vinton, VA 24179 Jim Young, President Roanoke Valley of Virginia Economic Development Partnership 111 Franklin Plaza, Suite 333 Roanoke, VA 24011 At the September 21, 1993, meeting of elected officials and business leaders, it was the consensus of the business leaders and elected officials that we endeavor on some cooperative efforts. To that end, it was the consensus that I ask that each government in the Valley take a formal position on the request to regionalize the Valley's efforts with regard to water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism. In exchange for this regional effort, the legislators present agreed to introduce legislation that would bring the State into the process as a participant by possibly rebating the State income tax on new businesses for a period of years to be distributed to all the localities regardless of the location of the new business. This letter is to officially request that by no later than October 15, 1993, your governing body take formal action expressing its willingness and interest in formalizing a matrix to regionalize water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism efforts in exchange for monetary considerations from the State. If all governments agree, we would hope to have in place by January the necessary organizational and legal frameworks to secure regionalization and permit us to go to the 1994 General Assembly to push for State assistance. ~-S October 2, 1993 Page four A copy of this letter has also been mailed to the business groups listed on page three of this letter to ask their concurrence regarding this matter before October 15, 1993. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, C. Richaz~d~anwell ~'" THE REGIONAL ~ CHAMBER ROANOKE REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 310 First Street tSW Roonoke, VA 24011 (703) 983-0700 (703) 983-0723 fax RESOLUTION ,` WHEREAS, the Roanoke region, in recent years, has economically fallen behind other major areas in Virginia and North Carolina; WHEREAS, the Roanoke area is experiencing underemployment; WHEREAS, while the Roanoke region previously compared favorably for income growth, the gap between Roanoke and its Southern neighbors has increased; WHEREAS, recent polls conducted by the Roanoke Times and World-News of citizens, ir. the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County clearly reflect the desire of City and County residents to merge various services; WHEREAS, on September 21, 1993, Delegate Richard Cranwell convened a meeting of area elected officials and business leaders to discuss regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste and economic development and tourism marketing; WHEREAS, Delegate Richard Cranwell, at that meeting, offered to lead a legislative effort to obtain state funds which would be used to support regionalization and/or as incentives; WHEREAS, these efforts by Delegate Cranwell and other members of the Legislature are appreciated; WHEREAS, to move forward with this proposal, a commitment by local elected officials is critical; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce supports Delegate Cranwell's proposal to initiate legislation that will provide financial incentives to local governments for regionalization of various services; FURTHER, the Regional Chamber of Commerce respectively request all local governing bodies to support this legislative initiative as being in the best interest of the entire region. M. oud President AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING DELEGATE CRANWELL'S EFFORTS FOR REGIONALIZATION OF WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM WHEREAS, recent polls in the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County clearly reflect the desire of City and County residents to merge various services; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1993, Delegate Richard Cranwell convened a meeting of area elected officials and business leaders to discuss regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism marketing; and WHEREAS, Delegate Richard Cranwell, at that meeting, offered to lead a legislative effort to obtain state funds which would be used to support regionalization and/or as incentives; and WHEREAS, these efforts by Delegate Cranwell and other members of the Legislature are appreciated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports Delegate Cranwell's proposal to initiate legislation that will provide financial incentives to local governments for regionalization of various services; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County respectively requests all local governing bodies to support this legislative initiative as being in the best interest of the entire region. ACTION NO. } ITEM NUMBER ~ "'~' " AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session to Tour the Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Smith Gap Landfill, the Dixie Caverns Landfill and the Regional Airport COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SIIMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a calendar showing events for the next three months with tentative programs for some of the events attached to the calendar. There are many events scheduled for October, November and December which will involve the Board members. Additionally, staff would like to schedule tours for the Board members to see the ongoing progress at our major projects - Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Smith Gap Landfill and the Dixie Caverns cleanup and closeout. Supervisor Johnson has also suggested a tour of the airport when other tours are scheduled. Plans call for the reservoir to begin filling in January and I would like the Board members to see the final stages of construction prior to that time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors schedule a work session to tour the Smith Gap Landfill, the Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Dixie Caverns Landfill and the regional airport. The work session can be scheduled prior to a regular board meeting, or a special meeting can be scheduled fo this urpose. Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens .6 ~ "~ t ~-1 M ~ ~ ~ ~ U '-' 0 .~ ti °a cc C y S0~ 0 a 3 a~ Mp~ N a ~ ~ N a o ~ ~ ° au ~. P' 1 ~ 3 0 3~ ~ 04 a - 39 ~ N N ~ -~ s- L ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Nf ~ ~ N ~~ ~ •~ ~ f a ~ o 7 \O rM,,.~ N N -~ ,~~~,~ a ~` S F ~ N ~~ ~ J ~ ~~~017 ~ ~ ~,,.,~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ LL o a ~ a e , . m ~- , a ~ r ~ ~ ~' ~ 04 ~ J ~ N ; ~ > 1 M ~ ~ J N M ~~ s~, O Z v~ .~ w ~O ~ N N 0 ~ N ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ Q •.. ~ .y ~- ~ ~ ~' ~"~ T ~ d0 ~ d ~ s ~ ~ ~- N M ~ ~ ~ N t ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N M ~'' ~~ Q ~ , F ( ~ ~~ w ,~ m r ~ ~ ~ ~ N N Q ~ ~ ~ N N E-/ ~. N U N Q o~ .~ w h ~ ,r ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ tl M ~ ~ " ~o . H ~ ~~ ~, s ~ Q ~ "` v o \p M O N ,_ s ~ ~ 1; ~ ~ ~ ry M £ ~ L ~ C ~ , t $ ~ - 6` .. , trl y. , ~ ~ ~ -a ~ 0~0 ~ N N ~ ~ d v 4 d 3 ~' ~ 'd' a~p~ ~ 0~0 l~ ~ r,.,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~~£ £ ~ ~a ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ N 1 ACTION NO. ~' ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance declaring Pinkard Court Leisure Arts Center surplus property and donating said property to Total Action Against Poverty COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,~,~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This report requests the Board of Supervisors to (1) declare the Pinkard Court Leisure Arts Center surplus property, and (2) donate the property to Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) for the purpose of developing and operating special purpose housing or any other purpose consistent with TAP's mission and local zoning. BACKGROUND• On November 17, 1992 the Board directed the staff to explore the disposition of certain County buildings and properties as part of its approval of the acquisition of the Traveler's building. The Board of Supervisors was presented with information that discussed the possible relocation of the Pinkard Court Leisure Arts Center's operations and programs to the Roanoke County Administration Center, contingent upon the relocation of the RCAC functions to the Traveler's Building. On December 15, the Board was advised that discussions regarding the status of Pinkard Court were continuing and that any future action would be brought back to the Board for approval. Effective April 1994, all Leisure Arts Center operations and programmatic activities will be moved to the RCAC, making this building available for surplus status. ~-I 2 In anticipation of designating this building as surplus, the staff met with the residents of the Pinkard Court community several times over the past year to get their ideas and perspectives on appropriate future uses of the building. A main concern of the residents was that the building not be left vacant, as the property was vandalized in the early 1980's when it was vacant. During these meetings, the residents indicated that apartments for the elderly or disabled would be one acceptable use for the property. During 1993, the staff has discussed with Total Action Against Poverty the possibility of donating this building and property to TAP for a use that is consistent with TAP's mission and programs. The building's size and configuration are conducive to the adaptive reuse of this building for a purpose such as specialized apartments for the elderly or physically disabled. TAP would like to pursue such uses as a long term use of the building. Interim use of the building would be for TAP programs and offices at a scale of activity less than or equal to activities associated with the Leisure Arts Center. The attached ordinance declares this property as surplus, authorizes the donation of the property to Total Action Against Poverty, and authorizes the County Administrator to execute any documents necessary to effectuate the transfer of the property to TAP. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. Approve first reading of the prepared ordinance and schedule second reading for October 26, 1993. Respectfully Submitted, ~c~ Terrance L. Harrin on, AICP Director of Plann ng and Zoning Approved, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens G-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE DECLARING PINKARD COURT LEISURE ARTS CENTER SURPLUS PROPERTY AND DONATING SAID PROPERTY TO TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on October 12, 1993; and a second reading was held on October 26, 1993, concerning the disposition of 4.5 acres, more or less, known as the Pinkard Court Leisure Arts Center, Tax Map No. 87.08-1-30; and 3. That the donation of this property to Total Action Against Poverty is hereby authorized; and 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the donation of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\realest\pinkard•ct ACTION NO. r~, ITEM NO. ~T ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: An ordinance governing the procedures and standards for the regulation of cable television rates pursu- ant to the rules of the Federal Communications Commission and the Cable Television Consumer Pro- tection Act of 1992 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The adoption of this ordinance will satisfy one of the legal prerequisites for obtaining certification from the F.C.C. to regulate rates for basic service as authorized by this Board on September 28, 1993. BACKGROUND' On September 28, 1993, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 92893-2 authorizing the filing of F.C.C. Form 328 with the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) to obtain certification for the county to regulate rates for basic cable service and equipment. One of the certifications required from Roanoke County on Form 328 pertains to the adoption and administra- tion of regulations regarding basic cable service which are consistent with those regulations adopted by the F.C.C. pursuant to the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act"). These local regulations must be adopted by Roanoke County as the franchising authority for its local cable television systems within 120 days of certification. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: This ordinance formally adopts for Roanoke County the legal authority provided by the 1992 Cable Act to regulate rates and charges for basic cable service and equipment for all cable television systems operating within the county. It incorporates the F.C.C.'s procedures for review of each cable system's rates in accord with the benchmark approach set forth in the F.C.C. regulations. These procedures will apply to both initial rates as well as subsequent increases. The ordinance specifies further powers available to the Board in the rate review process. G •a FISCAL IMPACTS• No additional fiscal impact is anticipated beyond that previously authorized by the Board for hiring of outside legal counsel to assist in this rate review process. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Approve this ordinance as required to obtain F.C.C. certification for regulation of basic cable service and equipment rates. 2. Reject the ordinance and risk denial of F.C.C. certifica- tion to regulate local cable television system operators. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, Jo ph ~. Obenshain S ~ for Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix vole No Yes Abs tP~ "~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 AN ORDINANCE GOVERNING THE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR THE REGULATION OF CABLE TELEVISION RATES PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND THE CABLE TELEVISION CONSUMER PROTECTION AND COMPETITION ACT OF 1992 WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of May, 1979, the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2308 granting to Salem Cable TV ("Grantee") the nonexclusive right to construct, own, and operate a cable television system in the County; and, WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of April, 1991, the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 42391-15 granting to Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. ("Grantee") the nonexclusive right to construct, own, and operate a cable television system in the County; and WHEREAS, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act") was enacted on October 5, 1992, and became effective on December 4, 1992. The 1992 Cable Act amends the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 and, in particular, Section 623 (47 U.S.C. 543) governing the regulation of rates charged by cable television operators; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 1993, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") adopted rate regulations pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act. These FCC rate regulations were released May 3, 1993, and became effective September 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Part 76.900, Subpart N, Section ~ -a 76.910, on the day of 1993, the County submitted FCC Form 328--Certification for Local Franchising Authorities--to the FCC via Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested. Pursuant to Section 76.910, the date on the return receipt, ~ 1993, is to be considered the date filed. A copy of FCC Form 328 was also served on Grantee on , 1993, the same day it was filed with the FCC; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 76.910, the County's certification becomes effective 30 days after the date filed; and WHEREAS, in adopting this Ordinance, the County reviewed applicable FCC regulations governing the basic service tier and provided a reasonable opportunity for consideration of the views of interested parties. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 12, 1993; and the second reading was held on October 26, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this Ordinance will govern the procedures to be undertaken by the County for the regulation of Grantee's Cable television rates pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act and the regulations of the FCC as follows: Section 1. Full Regulatorv Power Reserved. All rates and charges for basic cable service and any other cable programming services, as defined by the 1992 Cable Act and applicable FCC regulations, shall, to the 2 G-a- extent permissible, be subject to regulation by the County in a manner provided by this Ordinance. This Ordinance shall apply to all cable television system operators in the County. The Grantees and/or any other operator of a cable television system operating in the County shall be subject to the rate regulation provisions provided for herein, and those of the FCC at 47 C.F.R., Part 76.900, Subpart N. The County reserves the right to amend this Ordinance from time to time consistent with the requirements of the FCC, and state and federal law. Section 2. Procedures for Implementing Regulation of Basic Cable Service. A. The County hereby adopts and shall follow the rules relating to cable rate regulation promulgated by the FCC at 47 C.F.R., Part 76.900, Subpart N. B. Upon adoption of this Ordinance, a County representative will send to each Grantee and each operator of a cable television system in the County, via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, a written notice, which shall include a copy of this Ordinance and the completed FCC Form 328. 3 G-a C. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice referenced in Section 3.B., each Grantee and any other cable television operator shall respond with rate and benchmark information utilizing FCC From 393-- Determination of Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services and Actual Cost of Equipment. 1. If the initial rates and/or any subsequent rate increases are within the FCC standards, the rates will be effective thirty (30) days after submission. 2. If the County is unable to determine whether the rate in issue is within the FCC's standards, based on the material before it, or if the Grantee or any other cable operator has submitted a cost-of- service showing seeking to justify a rate above the FCC's reasonable rate level, the County may take an additional period of time to make a final determination and toll the effective date of the proposed rates for a commensurate period. a. The County may take an additional 90 days if it needs more time to ensure 4 G-a that a rate is within the FCC's rate standards. b. The County may take an additional 150 days to evaluate a cost-of- service showing seeking to justify a rate above the reasonable rate level. c. The County must issue a brief written decision regarding its invocation of the additional time period. 3. If no action is taken within the above referenced time periods, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders if the County later issues a decision disapproving any portion of the proposed rates. 4. In all cases, the County will issue a written decision to approve the rate schedule, disapprove the rate schedule or continue for review. 5. If rates are in excess of the FCC's standards, the rates may be reduced by the County pursuant to applicable FCC regulations. 5 G-~ D. After the initial rate schedule procedures are followed, as described in this Section, each Grantee and/or any other cable operator shall, in conjunction with each change in the rates and charges applicable to basic cable service, conform to the standards of the FCC. Before any rate change is effective, each Grantee and/or any other cable operator shall notify the County of its requested rate change by giving the County thirty (30) days advance written notice before the change is effective and by providing the County with its rates and applicable information pursuant to FCC regulations. E. To the extent specifically permitted by federal law and applicable FCC rules, each Grantee and/or any other cable operator shall be permitted to appeal to the FCC for a review of the decision of the County. Section 3. Consultant and Costs. A. The County may utilize a rate consultant to advise it on proposed rate changes and to assist it in the procedures and the standards for review adopted by the FCC. A rate consultant may be any person who has sufficient background and experience, in the 6 G-~. sole opinion of the County, to properly evaluate and analyze rates and charges. B. All costs for the review of initial rates or rate changes shall be paid by the cable operator upon demand of the County, unless contrary to applicable rules of the FCC governing these procedures or unless otherwise specifically preempted by state or federal law. The costs shall include, but not be limited to, rate consultants, attorney's fees and the reasonable value of services (as determined by the County) rendered by the County or any County employees, agents or representatives of the County. Section 4. Apulication of the Requirements in this Ordinance. The requirements described in this Ordinance are applicable to each Grantee and all operators of cable television systems within the County subject to rate regulation according to the 1992 Cable Act and applicable FCC rules. 2. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. 7 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of a Right-of-Way and Easement on Fort Lewis Mountain to David Shelor COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: o~ .~ `~ BACKGROUND• In connection with the upgrade of Roanoke County's radio tower on Fort Lewis Mountain as a part of the Phase II Public Safety Trunked Communications System, Mr. David Shelor provided to the County's contractors and employees working on this project a right- of-way across his property which substantially reduced the time and distance required to travel to this tower. As part of the consideration to Mr. Shelor for not charging the County, or its contractors, any rent or fee for use of this right-of-way, Mr. Shelor has requested a right-of-way from the County from the end of Westward Lake Drive to a parcel of real estate presently owned by him. The granting of this easement will not interfere with access to the County's water storage tank located nearby or other anticipated County use of this property. FISCAL IMPACTS• No fiscal impact is anticipated. No monetary consideration is being requested of Mr. Shelor in light of the previous benefit provided by him to the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ,!° ~ ~ ~, ..~~ y~ oseph benshain, Esq. Se for ssistant County Attorney Approved by, Elmer C. odge County Administrator C` -3 Approved Denied Received Referred to Action Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs G-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT ON FORT LEWIS MOUNTAIN TO DAVID SHELOR BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. a right-of-way and easement for ingress and egress to real estate currently owned by David Shelor; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on October 12, 1993; a second reading was held on October 26, 1993; and 3. That the fifty (50) foot wide right-of-way and easement will extend for a distance of approximately six hundred and thirty (630) feet across the property of the County of Roanoke, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, on the south side of Ft. Lewis Mountain from the end of Westward Lake Drive to the property owned by David Shelor. The real estate crossed by said easement was granted unto Roanoke County by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and 4. That the fifty (50) foot right-of-way and easement for David Shelor bisects a parcel owned by Roanoke County and will require the joint use of said easement area in order to prevent the separation of the County's property into two tracts; and 1 G-3 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the offer of David 5helor for the joint easement in consideration of the benefit provided to Roanoke County by him in the form of access and use of a right-of-way across his property to the top of Fort Lewis Mountain is accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2 r ~- V AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 101293-6 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A TEMPORARY GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN ASSOCIATION WITB THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FORENSIC LAB AND TO ACCEPT A WATER LINE EASEMENT AND SEWER LINE EASEMENT FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the acquisition and conveyance of several easements is required between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, the Roanoke County School Board, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, in connection with construction on the site of the state Forensic Laboratory; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the County of Roanoke to acquire from the Commonwealth of Virginia a 10' water line easement and a 15' sanitary sewer line easement; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Commonwealth of Virginia to acquire from the County of Roanoke a temporary grading and construction easement in order to develop a new and expanded parking facility, to be used by the State, the County, and the general public; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements will serve the interests of the public and are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on September 28, 1993; and a second reading r was held on October 12, 1993. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for construction of a public parking facility. 3. That donation of a temporary grading and construction easement on the parking area lying between the Northside High School property and the Public Safety Center property, adjoining the forensic laboratory site, for reconstruction of a public parking area, to the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized. 4. That the acquisition and acceptance of a new 10' water line easement and a new 15' sanitary sewer easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized and approved. 5. That any existing water or sanitary sewer easements across the property shall be vacated and abandoned upon installation, approval and acceptance of the new facilities. 6. That the easements to be conveyed and acquired involve donations and appropriation of funds is not required. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish these conveyances and acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Don C. Myers, Assistant Paul M. Mahoney, County Steve Sigel, Forensic L. Pete Haislip, Director, A COPY TESTE: `~. C~e~~ Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Assistant County Administrator County Administrator Attorney ~b Parks & Recreation r 7 _ ~..`-.~~..r a i~~ '~- B ~.....~ww~.~.~ /.121O1d2lOGV1 A2t31S371 3~III~S ~ISa~J03 dp NOISNIa -c~ur~o~ .anon ~~ ~V ~~ I I I I -f r ~1 I I i ~ i I y II ~i± ~ 3Y9 _ r ~ C i> A a" f N~ ~ (, ~. a~ ~ f ~- .r ~ a ;,:1~ o c ~e 'q o+sisi ~ 8§~ g 4 5 yts~ 3 s•, : ~- s~~ g e q EE °- 3~~a~r ~~~~~i r~2F~ ` ~ ~g e~~ ~ ~ §b ~q~ L r`-° E o p '~ ~ ~ ` ` ri ~~ Q e ~ i -i~ i~ n~ ~ ~5 F ~~ ~rna ~~ c ~s~~q 3a; k~~ ~ ~~ ~i lad ~~ oy~ o~ ~b~Y 1 J, i 4 ] o 'J ~t {4 i ~a° f, ~3~~~!° ib6~`tbe ~2°:~~i i ~~ it :i~ Yp j:e i~ L~:~ i ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ Spy .. s e' I___~ ~ ~ ~~ ~{ 1}j ys 3g 9 a.~ o Qi l~S ~^ ~ r.. '~ Y -ir ~X e Y~~ ~RRq~. 4Fp PPPPPP~B~ ~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of a Temporary Grading and Construction Easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Association with the Construction of the New Forensic Lab and to Accept a Water Line Easement and Sewer Line Easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~yr4_ /l SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance authorizing the donation of a temporary grading and construction easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia at the Forensic Lab construction site and to accept water and sewer line easements from the Commonwealth of Virginia as necessary to allow the construction activity to proceed at the Forensic Lab property. In addition to these actions requested by the Board of Supervisors, a separate report has been issued to the County of Roanoke School Board requesting a drainage easement and a temporary grading easement from the School property adjacent to the athletic fields currently in construction. A letter has been sent to the appropriate parties advising the status of these requests so that the construction plans may be approved thus allowing construction to begin as quickly as possible. BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke has previously conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia a parcel of land between the County's Public Safety Center and the School properties for Northside High School for the construction of a new forensic laboratory by the Commonwealth of Virginia. A 15' drainage easement (A.) extending along the common property line between the Commonwealth of Virginia and the County of Roanoke School Board which runs perpendicular to Northside High School Road to the rear of the property is necessary to handle drainage coming from the athletic fields, from across Northside High School Road, and various areas outside of the paved parking facility associated with the forensic lab property. This drainage easement will be maintained by the County of Roanoke's d-i Department of Parks and Recreation in association with the athletic fields currently being constructed on School Board property. The request for this drainage easement in association with this project has been made to the County of Roanoke School Board. A 7.5' temporary construction easement (B.) has also been requested along the same common boundary identified above to allow grading for said new facility. This request has also been forwarded to the County of Roanoke School Board for its approval. The County of Roanoke is seeking a 10' water line easement (C.) for the extension of the water line across the front of the Commonwealth of Virginia property which will connect to the meter located on the School Board property. This easement will be 10' wide located adjacent to the property line/road right of way. The Commonwealth of Virginia also needs to donate a new 15' wide sewer line easement (D.). The center line shall be located at the newly installed manhole and extend from the point approximately 105' west of the Northside High School Road running parallel to said road to a point 270' east of said location, turning southwest for approximately 225', then turning an easterly direction approximately 23' to the property line. The County of Roanoke will also need to abandon all existing easements across said property, particularly as it relates to the relocation of the sewer line. The County of Roanoke will need to convey to the Commonwealth of Virginia a grading and construction easement (E.) to allow the removal of the existing surface-treated parking lot between the Public Safety Building and the new forensic lab site (upper parking lot) so that a new and expanded parking area may be developed by the State at the same profile (elevation) and to become a contiguous part of the parking facility across the front of the forensic property. The Commonwealth of Virginia will also develop an entrance into this parking area for use by the general public (County and State). FISCAL IMPACT: Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for the donation and acceptance of easements as described in this report by and between the County of Roanoke and the Commonwealth of Virginia. This ordinance also provides for the vacation of any existing water or sanitary sewer easements across the Forensic Lab property upon installation, approval and acceptance of the new facilities. N-1 2. Decline to authorize donation or acceptance of the aforementioned easements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #l. Respectful~l~~y submitted, App~r~oved b , r~ ~~~..~i-.~~ ' C~~'yriN~' ohn M. Chambli Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Steve Sigel, Forensic Lab Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator Pete Haislip, Parks and Recreation Attached Map r~-r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A TEMPORARY GRADING AND CONSTRIICTION EASEMENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE CONSTRIICTION OF THE NEW FORENSIC LAB AND TO ACCEPT A WATER LINE EASEMENT AND SEWER LINE EASEMENT FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the acquisition and conveyance of several easements is required between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, the Roanoke County School Board, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, in connection with construction on the site of the state Forensic Laboratory; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the County of Roanoke to acquire from the Commonwealth of Virginia a 10' water line easement and a 15' sanitary sewer line easement; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Commonwealth of Virginia to acquire from the County of Roanoke a temporary grading and construction easement in order to develop a new and expanded parking facility, to be used by the State, the County, and the general public; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements will serve the interests of the public and are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of ~w~ this ordinance was held on September 28, 1993; and a second reading was held on October 12, 1993. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for construction of a public parking facility. 3. That donation of a temporary grading and construction easement on the parking area lying between the Northside High School property and the Public Safety Center property, adjoining the forensic laboratory site, for reconstruction of a public parking area, to the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized. 4. That the acquisition and acceptance of a new 10' water line easement and a new 15' sanitary sewer easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized and approved. 5. That any existing water or sanitary sewer easements across the property shall be vacated and abandoned upon installation, approval and acceptance of the new facilities. 6. That the easements to be conveyed and acquired involve donations and appropriation of funds is not required. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish these conveyances and acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. . ~~~ ~~ ~......._._... a ,............,..,. ', +~-~~ ~~r~+r.i w~+rwn Jllllt7'v'd "Rr71Q3L1 ~~y~ ! c~j ~ ~ ~~a ~ ~ieQ /rl2iO1b210Q+V'1 1~f31S3T1 , j f 3~-~i31~S ~14T~tJ03 d0 N~ISNIC] ~'~~ ~~ ~ U ~p i S >; ~~ I ~~ r ~1 I I ~ iy,l iF4 ~~`_ ~~~~ _ e - e ~ i 7 [. ~~ A Q~ i i / ~~~ aj~~ ~._ ~ ~/ ~4 i i ~ ~~ .~ ~ 4 ~~ .~ *-= 6 s S ~ ~ b ~' b ~~ ~~~ r ~~~~[[~; aE~ez a ~~ :~~ ~~ eft ~: s~~3~i~ ESE€'i ~r~i ~ ~~ ~ ~3~ ~t ~ ~ `p a~~ I .~~g 6 s" a ppy Yk Ijap C r C C~ E~~E~~~ z~~~~~t o~tl°~ ~ ~p~ C•Y ;6g ~i t:~ i~ iii} Rjj ~ge ~~ ~SEZ~ils a~S~~be ~I~~~i i i~ Y~ ~i4 Yh ! ~~ L~=°-° l L . .... •Yj - .. ~ ~ r T B ~J ~ ° I 3° i~j ya 4$ 4 J [L! ° Q~1t i ~ °.~~ J b ~ ~. ~ ~_ '-- 1 ~~ _~~ i FL0 r ~`{k 7~q~. 4Fd 444444~8~ ~~ z ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Grievance Panel Two-year term of Joy A. Herbert, Alternate expired October 10, 1993. Ms. Herbert is moving out of the Roanoke Valley and is not eligible to serve another term. 2. Planning Commission Four-year unexpired term of Ronald L. Massey, Hollins Magisterial District. His term will expire December 31, 1995. Mr. Massey has resigned effective 9/30/93. 3. Reqional Cable TV Committee Three-year unexpired term of Thomas E. Finton, citizen representative. His term will expire June 11, 1995. Mr. Finton has resigned. Submitted by: ~+ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by: f'~7 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs ( ) Edd Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~~~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLIITION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 12, 1993 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Firetruck Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 4. Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. 5. Resolution of Support to Eliminate Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government. 6. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Valley Interstate 73 Route Alternative. 7. Acceptance of Donation of Right-of-Way for the Chester Drive Road Project. 8. Appointment of a Committee to Negotiate with Salem Cable TV Upon Terms for Renewal of their Franchise. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ~~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 12, 1993 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Firetruck Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 4. Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. 5. Resolution of Support to Eliminate Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government. 6. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Valley Interstate 73 Route Alternative. 7. Acceptance of Donation of Right-of-Way for the Chester Drive Road Project. 8. Appointment of a Committee to Negotiate with Salem Cable TV Upon Terms for Renewal of their Franchise. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Consent Resolution after discussion of Items 4 and 8, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~'~ ~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning -i ~.~. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGIILAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION 101293-7.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FERGIISON DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Ferguson Drive Length:0.24 miles From: Timberland Trail (State Route to be determined) To: 0 24 miles in a Northwesterly direction to a turn-around Guaranteed Right-of-Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974 Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Plat Recorded, Date: March 14, 1975 Plat Book: 9 Page: 18. Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book: 1406 Page 1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book: 1402 Page 930, Deed Recorded, Date: September 17,1993, Deed Book: 1399 Page 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: May 25, 1993, Deed Book: 1417 Page 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, resolution be forwarded to the Department of Transportation. that a certified copy of this Resident Engineer of the Virginia Recorded Vote Moved By:Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By:Not Rectuired Yeas:Supervisors Johnson Kohinke Eddv Nickens, Minnix Nays:None A Copy Teste: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101293-7.a requesting acceptance of Ferguson Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. (.~G~C~-~.1 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~~ xllos ~ aR 803 '~~ ~pENSHIRE `` o ~ k 1000 ~ `•• ,)P HOMELANp° HILLSa g0 F~~~S~H f~RGV ~Pa ~ 721 V ~/ BAPTIST/ 8cndy ,\\ _-~~+~~ VICINITY ,MAP' NORTH ' ~ a 5655 Ol o, ~ -93.32 ,~ 18 ~ ° ~ ~~ 22 31 'y 13333 r . 53 ~,, 5623 32 37.1 5.4 l ~ ~z~ ,' 21 3.C~Ac 20•I s '' ~ 6.956 c ,Z ~ 5.24 Ac 5529 3.50Ac 5.59 Ac 37 a5 p5 21 563 ~ a 4 a :969 550/ 12.65 AC (A) 1241 4.41Ac 20 i•' ~ '~,' 3i278 5511 7.74 Ac (C) 4253 4252 2 8 TZ rz 5 29 30 „ 33 z9• • e 106.13 •6 ~ 0 5451 • $ ~ 34 ~S 8.19 m~ti` IAC LOOAc ~',~ ~ o 5620 Q 28876 `{, 5 's JJ 35 4 18 I? 1.12 ~ 4~ 49 3.94Ac 9,~ Ss0 S6 9 ~ Ac~\mberland Tro;l Ac OIAc 137 AC ,,~~16•s°J o 1.18Ac(D) 45.2 ga3~ g9j2;A41''-,~3g3~ 13 o9ti 15 :s ' '" 1.44Ac (C) ,oaz, 2.44 ~, ~ ~ 4 43 ~~ 11.96 Ac •09'~'~~` 142•e 45.1 4eJ o . 4 ' ~", 'g6 9 ~ ~9i 1.~8 Zc 4: 4. I I Ac ID) 46 1.74 Ac I.0 ~ Ac 4. I ~ ~ ~i~` ~ 117Ac (D, 1.38 c Fig 6~ ~ Ac IC) 1.59Ac ZZ~ 1.03AclC) ~ / OI gus Voll Rt• -- ~ ~ asl 5 ~! 9' ~ e 5 q sal ~9 ~-_. ~ ~_8 ••zso,s, .. "zl 2. 3~c ~ 7.23Ac ~~ 0) ~ 1~7~ 1.55Ac lD) oc~`f~~' . C) 4691 1.85Ac lC) O 7 ~::~~-~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Ferguson Drive from determined) in a Nori LENGTH: 0.24 RIGHT OF WAY: 50 ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 SURFACE WIDTH: 20 SERVICE: 3 Timberland Trail (State Route to be :hwesterly direction to a turn-around. MILES FEET FEET FEET HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF FERGIISON DRIVE INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT g ..~ _ ~.b THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION 101293-7.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Timberland Trail Length:0.22 miles From: Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) To: 0.22 miles in a Northeasterly direction to a turn-around Guaranteed Right-of-Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974, Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book:1406 Page:1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book:1402 Page:930, Deed Recorded, Date: April 22, 1993, Deed Book: 1399, Page: 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: September 17 1993, Deed Book: 1417, Page: 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By:Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By:Not Required Yeas:Supervisors Johnson Kohinke, Eddv, Nickens, Minnix Nays:None A Copy Teste: y')') ~~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101293-7.b requesting acceptance of Timberland Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. ~ ~. Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~ NORTH D) ~) ! Il ~ Z3Ac~// .R~ ~~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY 1) DESCRIPTION: Ac Timberland Trail from Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) in a Northeasterly Direction to a turn-around. LENGTH: 0.22 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: 2a FEET SERVICE: 5 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail are a part of the 1985 Road Bond referendum. The private roads are located in Southeastern Roanoke County an serve eight families. Originally, there were three roads in Homeland Hills Subdivision to be considered for State Maintenance but the homeowners on Wild Oak Drive declined to dedicate right-of-way or pay the speculative interest required by State Law. Prior to acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation and assigning of a State Route Number, staff has to submit a completed package of information, including a Board Resolution requesting acceptance of these roads. Once these roads are accepted, the Virginia Department of Transportation will schedule the necessary construction improvements to bring these roads into compliance with state standards. FISCAL IMPACTS Funding for surveying, engineering, and administrative work on these roads were within the yearly roadway activity of the Engineering and Inspections Department's budget. Construction funds will be or are available in the accounts administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. ~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisor's approve the resolutions to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting the acceptance of Timberland Trail and Ferguson Drive into the Secondary System. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: !>+~ rnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspec ions County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs 2 ~.J `'' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FERGUSON DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Ferguson Drive Length:0.24 miles From: Timberland Trail (State Route to be determined) To: 0 24 miles in a Northwesterly direction to a turn-around Guaranteed Right-of-Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974 Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Plat Recorded, Date: March 14. 1975 Plat Book: 9 Page: 18. Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book: 1406 Page 1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book: 1402 Page 930, Deed Recorded, Date: September 17,1993, Deed Book: 1399 Page 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: May 25, 1993, Deed Book: 1417 Page 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and Si BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, resolution be forwarded to the Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By:_ Yeas• Nays: A Copy Teste: that a certified copy of this Resident Engineer of the Virginia Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~.J "' j xlws ~ RR 803 '~~ ~pENSHIRE .~ / o kI000 ~ . JPv` HOMELAND° F~~~S ~ FE¢G~So e°' 721 o~~ ppQQKK~~11 ~ ~ / eBAP715Ir Bondy ,\ - ~~~ ~` VICINITY .,MAP' NORTH • a ~ _ 565y 42 0, -93.32 ° ~°~ 31 18 22 i '' 3333 ~ ~: 5, ~ ~ 5623 32 37.1 5.4 T 22 ~ 2) 5.24 Ac 3.c~oAc . rp a2),`'~ 20•i ' : 6.956 c `2 '"4 , ,s, ~a 5529 3.50Ac 5.59 Ac 3? 45 12.65 Ac tD) ~$ 21 56 4.j N 6 :969 5501 124/ 4.41Ac 20 z e72 ;, X12 5'12j8 29 55// ~,~ 774 Ac lC) 4255 452 z 30 ^ 33 2`J 545/ ioe.iJ g46 ;, `'', ti.`~ 8 1.50 a ~ 34 5620 ~ 20e.,e .~ st. 5 ys JJ 35 17 1.12 36 4~ 49 4 IS SSO Ss4927 erland rrai- Ac 3.94Ac 9„ Ssc'95.53Ac'~`~b OIAc 1.37AC 53812;41- ~~ .,~ 16.3`s ry^ 1.18Ac(D) 45.2. 4 9 g ?o .193' ~3 oatil5 .s ° ' 1.44Ac (C) aa24 2.44 43 , ~" `~ e° 4 ,~ayJ G` 32.45 45.1 a ~'~!~^, 862 :~91 ` 1.~8 Ac i 1.96 Ac ,a9 14 45 _ • a ~~ .9 ~ ,,1 4.1 Z %. ~~ ~ 4. I I Ac (C) 46 1.74 Ac I.0 • Ac \ LI7Ac (D; 1.38 c 4~9~ ~~9U5 Va)I R 1.59Ac R` ZZ 1.03Ac(C) ~ ~ r /• _~ ` 5 .! 4 63. I I`FPm 9~ .. ~~... ~ ~~° 6 481J ~;O _=',1~FP 8 z3orsr .. 2i 2.73~C 0 7.23 AC ~~ B / :. D) 469/ 1.55Ac lD) ~ :.. ~: c~~FP-~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Ferguson Drive from determined) in a Nori LENGTH: 0.24 RIGHT OF WAY: 50 ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 SURFACE WIDTH: 20 SERVICE: 3 Timberland Trail (State Route to be :hwesterly direction to a turn-around. MILES FEET FEET FEET HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY .ACCEPTANCE OF FERGUSON DRIVE INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT g ~~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Timberland Trail Length:0.22 miles From: Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) To: 0.22 miles in a Northeasterly direction to a turn-around Guaranteed Right-of-Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974, Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book:1406 Page:1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book:1402 Page:930, Deed Recorded, Date: April 22, 1993, Deed Book: 1399, Page: 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: September 17 1993, Deed Book: 1417, Page: 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By:_ Yeas• Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4 • NORTH '03 ~v'i2 363gy 4 ;, s1 se 3329 ,,.,,....,.. .....,..,,, _ ~24i 4.4iAc 20 z4s a ;~ • 4~ 3S0/ 12.65 Ac (D) 4?33 4?32 ~, ~~ 5;12 78 ~ 33ii 7.74 Ac (C) ioa.ia ~c s . 33 z9~ ~ s '' ' ~~~ 8 1.96 A : ,34 343/ 5620 ~ • ~ ~~ ~ 5 I.OOAc ~• 4 'g x~7 s er uson r ~~ ~ ~ so ss4y27 1.12 36 40 s2 3.94Ac ~~ s6.09 `m~tland Troil Ac e '{ 01 Ac 137 AC . X16 ~' a 1.18Ac(D5.53Ac 45.2 543 4g12~41''0 13 , ~~s =~ 1.44Ac (C) max. 2.44 ° 11.96 Ac 9, •69 u.+s ~ ~,~ ~ 43 ~~~~ `~ ~~ 4 pO 14 45. I 45 ~' 862 a ,rl 1.~8 ac ,~ 4. I 1 Ac (D) 46 1.74 A~ I. ' Ac , g ''' 4.1 2 . e~ U ~ VOII R Ac (C) 1.59Ac '(2~ 03Ac(DC) I~/c . ~) ~~ -~- ~,°~, :~ 2.73 I23Ac / 1.05Ac (D) I.54Ac (C) ~ ~`~~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Timberland Trail from Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) in a Northeasterly Direction to a turn-around. LENGTH: 0.22 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: 2Q FEET SERVICE: 5 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 ACTION NO. A-101293-7.c ITEM NO. ~-" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Grumman Aircraft Company - Firetruck Litigation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ __ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc. over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck. BACKGROUND: In November of 1991,. the Board agreed to join with the Town of Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town. Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation. The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows: February 11, 1992 $ 1,151.95 March 24, 1992 1 437.59 May 26, 1992 2,363.43 June 23, 1992 1,779.16 September 8, 1992 228.71 September 22, 1992 868.75 October 27, 1992 941.00 December 1, 1992 289.00 December 15, 1992 843.00 February 23, 1993 3 835.00 March 23, 1993 6 648.60 April 4, 1993 480.10 1 t .._,_,_ , ,, May 25, 1993 June 3, 1993 July 2, 1993 July 9, 1993 August 31, 1993 Total FISCAL IMPACTS• $ 1,315.36 751.00 645.92 59.38 (Grainger) 379.25 $24,017.20 $883.63 (August 25, 1993 statement) in current fees to be paid from the Potential Litigation Account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the payment of this invoice from the Board's Potential Litigation Account. Respectfully submitted, ~ t v ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Vote No Yes Abs Motion by Edward G. Kohinke Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Nickens x Minnix x File cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney c;\wp51 \agenda\general\legal.fee 2 TOWN OF VINTON P. 0. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE (7031 983-0608 FAX (7031 983-0621 October 1, 1993 TO: Joe Obenshain, Senion Assistant County Attorney County of Roanoke POB 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 S ~ O OCT 0 4 1993 JOAN B. FURBISH FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER STATEMENT Professional Services Hahn Aerial Firespire Ladder Statement of August 25, 1993 $1,767.25 One Half Due From Roanoke County $883.63 DUE UPON RECEIPT cc: Ms. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Tommy Fuqua, Chief Roanoke County Fire Department A-101293-7.d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Industrial Development Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the September 14, 1993 meeting. 1. Industrial Development Authority Darnall Supervisor Nickens nominated Darnell Vinyard to another four- year term which will expire September 26, 1997 RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, ma.t.~~- ..~ . Cam? te~~ Mary H. Allen Clerk Approved by, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Industrial Development Authority -.~ -d. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.e OF SUPPORT RECOGNIZING OCTOBER AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, decent, safe, and affordable housing is the cornerstone upon which our families and our communities are built; and WHEREAS, substandard or deteriorating housing, inadequate plumbing, and overcrowding threaten the health and safety of Virginia's households and diminish the economic vitality of Virginia's communities; and WHEREAS, those Virginians with special needs for accessibility or supportive services have additional difficulty finding adequate affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the dream of decent affordable housing will only become a reality through the leadership and partnership of state and local governments, businesses and civic organizations; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, recognizes the month of October, 1993, as AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Department of Housing and Community Development 1 ACTION NO. r ITEM NO. ''" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• October is Affordable Housing Awareness Month in Virginia. This recognition was established by the Governor's Office to emphasize the importance of adequate, affordable housing for all residents of the Commonwealth. To demonstrate commitment to, and awareness of, affordable housing needs, localities are being asked to adopt a resolution supportive of affordable housing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L./ Harrin n, CP Director of Plann' g and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~~ 2 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Action Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs S~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT RECOGNIZING OCTOBER AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, decent, safe, and affordable housing is the cornerstone upon which our families and our communities are built; and WHEREAS, substandard or deteriorating housing, inadequate plumbing, and overcrowding threaten the health and safety of Virginia's households and diminish the economic vitality of Virginia's communities; and WHEREAS, those Virginians with special needs for accessibility or supportive services have additional difficulty finding adequate affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the dream of decent affordable housing will only become a reality through the leadership and partnership of state and local governments, businesses and civic organizations; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, recognizes the month of October, 1993, as AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH. .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.f SUPPORTING THE ELIMINATION OF UNFUNDED MANDATES BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, according to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia's local governments are subject to 391 Federal and state mandates; and WHEREAS, unfunded mandates on local governments have increased significantly in recent years; and WHEREAS, federal and state mandates require cities, counties and towns to perform duties without consideration of local circumstances or capacity; and WHEREAS, in some cases mandates require local governments to redirect their priorities to meet federal and state objectives rather than community objectives; and WHEREAS, excessive federal and state regulations on local governments impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes and fees, and/or reduced local services for residents; and WHEREAS, existing mandates impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these legislative and regulatory actions directly affect the citizens of our cities, counties and towns; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association are working with localities, school boards and organizations across the nation to begin a public education campaign to help citizens f understand and then reduce the burden and inflexibility of unfunded mandates, beginning with a National Unfunded Mandates Day on October 27, 1993; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, endorses the efforts of the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association and their national counterparts, and supports working with the national groups to fully inform our citizens about the impact of federal and state mandates on our governments and the pocketbooks of our citizens; THAT the Board of Supervisors plans to redouble efforts to inform members of our Congressional and General Assembly delegations about the impact of federal and state mandates and plans to work with the delegations to reduce the burden of unfunded mandates on our citizens. THAT the Board of Supervisors proclaims October 27, 1993, to be "Unfunded Mandates Day in the County of Roanoke," in observance of National Unfunded Mandates Day. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Municipal League Virginia School Boards Association Roanoke Area Legislators - State/Federal ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Supporting the Elimination of Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Association of Counties (VACo), the Virginia Municipal League (VML) and the Virginia School Boards Association have joined forces with the National League of Cities, the International City/County Management Association, the U. S. Conference of Mayors and other organizations to sponsor October 27, 1993 as National Unfunded Mandates Day. This will be the first day of a campaign to stop unfunded mandates. The purpose of the effort is to raise public awareness and understanding of the problem of the federal and state government imposing but not funding programs or requirements that local governments are directed to carry out. VACo and VML have requested that local governments adopt the attached resolution supporting their campaign. Their centerpiece event will be in Richmond on October 27 at 9:30 a.m. in front of City Hall. They have extended an invitation to all local officials to join them that morning. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted and forwarded to the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia Municipal League. ~- Elmer C. Hodge ___________________________________County_Administrator ------------------ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: _ VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~•~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ELIMINATION OF UNFUNDED MANDATES BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, according to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia's local governments are subject to 391 Federal and state mandates; and WHEREAS, unfunded mandates on local governments have increased significantly in recent years; and WHEREAS, federal and state mandates require cities, counties and towns to perform duties without consideration of local circumstances or capacity; and WHEREAS, in some cases mandates require local governments to redirect their priorities to meet federal and state objectives rather than community objectives; and WHEREAS, excessive federal and state regulations on local governments impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes and fees, and/or reduced local services for residents; and WHEREAS, existing mandates impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these legislative and regulatory actions directly affect the citizens of our cities, counties and towns; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association are working with localities, school boards and organizations across the nation to begin a public education campaign to help citizens ~" understand and then reduce the burden and inflexibility of unfunded mandates, beginning with a National Unfunded Mandates Day on October 27, 1993; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, endorses the efforts of the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association and their national counterparts, and supports working with the national groups to fully inform our citizens about the impact of federal and state mandates on our governments and the pocketbooks of our citizens; THAT the Board of Supervisors plans to redouble efforts to inform members of our Congressional and General Assembly delegations about the impact of federal and state mandates and plans to work with the delegations to reduce the burden of unfunded mandates on our citizens. THAT the Board of Supervisors proclaims October 27, 1993, to be "Unfunded Mandates Day in the County of Roanoke," in observance of National Unfunded Mandates Day. < < AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.ct SUPPORTING THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ROANORE VALLEY I-73 CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) identified in section 1106, (Identification of High Priority Corridor on National Highway System) proposes a north- south interstate (I-73) from Detroit to Charleston, SC; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke corridor alterntive is identified as following the U.S. 460 corridor from Princeton, West Virginia to the Blacksburg-Christiansburg area, then follow I-81 to the Roanoke Valley, and run south along U.S. 220 to the North Carolina state line; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley companies manufacture and distribute goods and services to customers along the proposed corridor; and WHEREAS, the proposed I-73 corridor would make the Roanoke Valley more accessible to visitors along the corridor; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County board of Supervisors wishes to express its support for the Roanoke Corridor Alternative to the Federal Highway Administration and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~_ Q Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Transportation Roanoke Area Legislators - State/Federal a Item No. ~J" ~{J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for support of the Roanoke Valley I-73 Corridor Alternative COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration has been directed by Congress to study 21 highway corridors. One such corridor is referred to as I- 73. This north-south interstate would run from Detroit, Michigan to Charleston, South Carolina. The originally proposed and recommended route would follow along Interstate 77. Other Roanoke Valley governments would like to suggest an alternate route which would go through the Valley. BACKGROUND: Through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), under section 1106, (Identification of High Priority Corridor on National Highway System) a north-south corridor was proposed and referred to as Interstate 73. The route would run from Detroit to Charleston. The Greater Bluefield Chamber of Commerce sponsored an ISTEA workshop June 1993. It was determined that officials in North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia had designated or were in the process of designating a corridor. Ohio and Virginia had not acted to specify a corridor. The Bluefield ISTEA group desires Virginia to designate I-77 as the I-73 corridor. The Blue Ridge Region of Virginia sought and received support from a variety of individual groups in July for a corridor following Route 460 from West Virginia to the Blacksburg-Roanoke- Christiansburg area, following I-81 to the Roanoke Valley and finally Route 220 from Roanoke to the North Carolina state line. FISCAL IMPACT• None r a ~~ W STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors endorse the attached resolution and notify appropriate state and federal officials of this action. Respectfully submitted: ~^ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Department of Economic Development Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment } ` ...~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY I-73 CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) identified in section 1106, (Identification of High Priority Corridor on National Highway System) proposes a north- south interstate (I-73) from Detroit to Charleston, SC; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke corridor alterntive is identified as following the U.S. 460 corridor from Princeton, West Virginia to the Blacksburg-Christiansburg area, then follow I-81 to the Roanoke Valley, and run south along U.S. 220 to the North Carolina state line; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley companies manufacture and distribute goods and services to customers along the proposed corridor; and WHEREAS, the proposed I-73 corridor would make the Roanoke Valley more accessible to visitors along the corridor; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County board of Supervisors wishes to express its support for the Roanoke Corridor Alternative to the Federal Highway Administration and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). ACTION NOA-101293-7.h ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE CHESTER DRIVE ROAD PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following right-of-way to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in connection with the Chester Drive Road Project in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of: (i) a small triangular parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY" on a plat, dated May 31, 1991, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest, now owned or hereafter acquired, in and to that certain road known and designated as Chester Drive, being 50' in width leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 1803 (Dexter Drive); from Charles A. McNutt and Julie B. McNutt, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1292, Page 1231) (Tax Map No. 27.14-6-5). County staff has inspected and approved the location and dimensions of the right-of-way for the project. FISCAL IMPACT' No county funding is required for this acquisition. ~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of right-of-way for the Chester Drive Road Project. Respectfully submitted, i~ Vick'e L. Hu an_ Assistant Co y Attorney Action Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Edward G. Kohinke Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Nickens x Minnix x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections - --- METES AM BOUNDS DESCRfP1'10iV SHOWN ON TN1S PLAT REPRESEJVT A COMPOS/TE OF DEEDS, pU~ ,Up ~.(~J(,ATED p~R~tAT}O~1y Alm Dt~ NOT ~tEfLECT AN AOCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ~~ ~~ PROPOSED RIGHT-OF- WAY CyEST~R D 3.82' R~VF CURVE ':4 " ,A., s 2p, 2s R = 40.0' 4.~0~ f ~ ~= 7°59'42" L = 5.58' 27.14-6-4 POPE, ROLAND JR., a LINDA W _~'~ McNUTT, CHARLES A. a JULIE B. so.oo, N 20°p9, W TAX MAP NO. 27.14-6-5 3 M . m co /~ I 27.14-6-6 ISBEL, CHARLES J. & LILLIAN J. SCALE: I ~~ : 40' PLAT S80WIl~]G RIC~Hf-CF-WAY ~I~1G OQd~EYID 1o RDANCRE OOONiY BY ~AHIES A. ~ JULY B. MI~TIT PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENG-NEERlNG DEPARTMENT DATE: 0 5 - 3 I - 9 ACTION NO. A-101293-7.i ITEM NO. ~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of a committee to negotiate with Salem Cable TV upon terms for renewal of a franchise to operate a cable television system in a portion of Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,,,,,/l EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY - Roanoke County's current franchise agreement with Boothe Communications Company, doing business as "Salem Cable TV," to operate a cable television system within a portion of the county adjacent to the City of Salem will expire on or about May 22, 1994. A committee composed of Edward G. Kohinke, Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Dr. Jane James, Joseph B. Obenshain and Anne Marie Green is recommended to negotiate terms for the renewal of this franchise agreement with Boothe Communications Company's local representa- tives. BACKGROUND• Immense changes have occurred in the cable television industry over the past fifteen years culminating in the passage of The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act" hereafter). Equally significant for Roanoke County was the renegotiation of its franchise agreement with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., in 1991 which is resulting in substantial increases in channel capacity, extension of service, an increase in the franchise fee, a fiber optic institutional network, free cable service to county schools and governmental buildings and more PEG channels. This impending franchise renewal process offers an opportunity to bring to county residents within the area served by Salem Cable TV the opportunity for equality of services to those offered to county residents by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: A committee is proposed consisting of five individuals who have direct interest or experience in the issues which are anticipated to be of most direct concern in the renegotiation of a franchise agreement with Salem Cable TV, a Boothe Communications Company. The qualifications of the individuals proposed are as i - 0` follows: Edward G. Kohinke, member of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors representing the Catawba District served by Salem Cable TV; Dr. Harry C. Nickens, member of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee (R.R. CATV Comm.) on which he serves as vice-chairman; Joseph B. Obenshain, Esq., Senior Assistant County Attorney, served as legal counsel for the county during negotiations with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., for franchise renewal in 1990-91 and currently the County~s legal counsel to the R.R. CATV Comm.; Anne Marie Green, Roanoke County~s Director of Community Relations and member of the R.R. CATV Comm. including serving on its Operations subcommittee; and Dr. Jane James, Director of Media Services for Roanoke County Schools and a member of the R.R. CATV Comm. FISCAL IMPACTS• No direct fiscal impact upon Roanoke County from the negotia- tion process is anticipated. Additional revenue for the County may ultimately result from any increase in the franchise fee which is negotiated as part of the franchise renewal process. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the appointment of the designated negotiating committee. 2. Develop an alternative approach for conducting negotia- tions with representatives of Salem Cable TV for renewal of their franchises. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, :,~ J eph bens ain S for Assistant County Attorney Action Vote Approved No Yes Abs (xx) Motion by Edward C' Kc~h i nka Eddy x Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendationJohnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Sr Assist County Attorney Anne Marie Green, R.R. CATV Com. Dr. Jane James, R.R. CATV Com. Boothe Coro-i •~unic.ations Randolph H. Smith, Salem City Mgr. M- i COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGII~TIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Unaudited) Original 1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve Original 1993-94 Budget Previously reserved for employee benefits and new administration building July 27, 1993 Reserved for ISTEA match August 24, 1993 VDOT Revenue Sharing Match Balance at October 12, 1993 $4,512,763 80,668 (886,182) (49,200) 25 000 3 633 049 % of General Fund Expenditures 4- Submitted By ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447). m-a COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE July 13, 1993 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 $90,464 (Unaudited) Northside High School Ball Fields 62 000 Balance as of October 12, 1993 $_ 4 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance /~1- 3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY July 13, 1993 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 Clerk of Circuit Court New Position $100,000 26 400 Balance as of October 12, 1993 Submitted by ~ -~ ~. ,=~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 73 600 PROCLAMATION DECLARING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 19 - 25, 1993 AS NATIONAL DEAF AWARENESS WEEK WHEREAS, the World Federation of the Deaf is an international organization composed of seventy national associations of the deaf, which, in collaboration with the United Nations (UNESCO, World Health Organization and International Labor Office), serves all countries in the enhancement of the social, economic and cultural lives of deaf and hard-of-hearing people; and WHEREAS, the World Federation of the Deaf has in the past forty-two years provided leadership at the international level in medicine and audiology, psychology of deafness, educational development and innovation, vocational rehabilitation, communications methodology, personal and social welfare, art and culture, parent education, and religious activities; and WHEREAS, the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) will participate as an integral part of the Deaf World Week celebration of the World Federation of the Deaf; and WHEREAS, representatives from a wide area of leadership in the United States of America serving deaf and hard-of-hearing populations throughout the world will be observing this significant event in recognition of the contributions geared to the needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing people throughout the country; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County offers its wholehearted welcome and best wishes to all participants for a renewed spirit of togetherness tempered by intensified commitment to a quality life for the entire deaf and hard-of-hearing population in the nation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of September 19 - 25, 1993, as NATIONAL DEAF AWARENESS WEEK in Roanoke County, Virginia, and invite all of our citizens to join in the observance of this week-long occa on. iv. ~ . . Odell "Fuz y" i ix, Chairma ATTEST: Mary H. Allen, Clerk PAGE 1 OF 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION (~TrER MEETING DATE: October 12 „ 1993 AGENDA ITEMS: Statett~rit of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of August 31, 1993. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S QOMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Bz~NKERS ACCEPTANCE: 604.44 997 CENTRAL FIDELITY , 995,294.17 1 CRAIGIE , 997,483.33 SIGNET 458.33 4,987,840.27 997 WHEAT 1ST , CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: CENTRAL FIDELITY I,000,OOO.OU NATIONS 500,000.OU SIGNET 1,000,UUO.OU SOUTHvVEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & UJAN 100,000.00 2,600,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER 561.58 006 1 CENTRAL FIDELITY , , 997,500.00 CRESTAR NATIONS 1,995,186.39 SIGNET' 997,627.78 SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 997,458.33 311.67 6,293,645.75 299 WHEAT 1ST , FEDERAL CREDIT: NATIONS 997,658.89 SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 997,583.33 1,995,242.22 LOCAL Gov'r INVES'IYKENT Pool. 3,036,883.32 3,036,883.32 NATIONS BANK REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: CENTRAL FIDELITY 493,235.89 FIRST VIRGINIA 3,234,000.00 SIGNEr 78,777.31 3,806,013.20 SAVINGS: 2,68$.18 NATIONS DOMINION 5,145.30 7,833.48 --------------- ~~ 22,727,458.24 Page 2 of 2 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REG[JLAR MEE'T'ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER 1~I'ING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of August 31, 1993. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: R/es/pec ully Sub `ted by f red C. Anderson County Treasurer ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Appro bY= Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VO'PE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohnike - - ,_ Minnix - - - Nickens - - - /p.-5 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER •I1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Refinancing of a Portion of the 1991 Water Revenue Bonds COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~, ~,,,,,,,,r-~ . ~~~ /~ ' ~~ ~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 28, 1993 the Board approved the refinancing of portions of the 1991 Water Revenue Bonds consisting of the 2021 Term Bond and 2031 Term Bond. The 2031 Term Bond must still be approved by the State Council on Local Debt which meets later this month. In order to take advantage of the current market rates we have divided this into two separate refinancing. The 2021 Term Bonds were refinanced on October S, 1993. Our original projections to the Board were a present value savings of $1,000,000. Actual savings from the refinancing of this bond were present value savings of $1,431,000. We will proceed with approval from the State Council on Local Debt for the refinancing of 2031 Term Bonds and hopefully refinance them later this month if the market conditions remain favorable. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Approved by, ~+s--.i Elmer C. odge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix _ _ Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ,~ (/~ ~t~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session r ~~ i CORRECTED 10/25/93 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 101293-9 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOIIS CHANGES "'T^°^""' T°" Gam= TO SAID MAPS (COTTON HILL) WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 91493-11 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on June 1, 1993 and July 6, 1993, and have made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993 and the second reading and public hearing was 1 held on September 14, 1993 and continued to October 12, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That "1992 Zoning District Maps of Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (A) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to AR, Agricutural/Residential District: 96.02-1-1 96.02-1-2 97.03-2-5 a p/o 97.01-2-17 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway) a p/o 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) (B) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to R-1, Low Density Residential District: 96.07-1-6 a p/o 96.02-1-46 (north of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) 2. That said map or maps entitled "~P~Pl~ E~A~~S~-B0~~6~~ ~-"ZONING CHANGES COTTON HILL AND POAGES VALLEY ROAD" (dated July 21, 1993) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is 2 directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix A COPY TESTE: ~C_.GX..C-/~./ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 101293-9 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY TO SAID MAPS (COTTON HILL) WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 91493-11 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on June 1, 1993 and July 6, 1993, and have made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993 and the second reading and public hearing was held on September 14, 1993 and continued to October 12, 1993. 1 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That "1992 Zoning District Maps of Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (A) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to AR, Agricutural/Residential District: 96.02-1-1 96.02-1-2 97.03-2-5 a p/o 97.01-2-17 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway) a p/o 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) (B) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to R-l, Low Density Residential District: 96.07-1-6 a p/o 96.02-1-46 (north of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) 2. That said map or maps entitled "ZONING CHANGES BONSACK" and "ZONING CHANGES COTTON HILL AND POAGES VALLEY ROAD" (dated July 21, 1993) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in 2 zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ACTION NO. r"~' ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TAE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment to the Zoning Classification of Beasley Property Adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In December 1992, the Board delayed the zoning of a number of parcels along the Blue Ridge Parkway and asked staff to further evaluate the impact of development on the Parkway. We were asked to work with Parkway officials and get their input on our new zoning ordinances as it affects the Parkway, and to minimize any negative impact. An ad hoc Parkway Review Committee was established consisting of developers, Friends of the Parkway, Parkway officials, and staff. The Committee identified eleven "critical" viewsheds that should be protected. These critical viewsheds will remain AG-1. On September 12, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on the properties adjacent to the Blue Ridge Property in the Bonsack, Cotton Hill and Poage Valley Road area. The Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance that rezoned the Sigmon Property (Cotton Hill Road) to R-1 with development limited to an average of 2.5 units per acre. The remaining properties outside of the critical viewsheds were zoned AR. The rezoning of the Beasley Property was continued to allow staff to continue negotiations with Len Boone the purchaser/developer of the Beasley property. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Beasley ProDert Len Boone filed suit against the County in January in an effort to get R-1 zoning of certain Beasley properties on the north and south side that he plans to purchase. Staff has been meeting with Mr. Boone over the past several months to resolve issues of protection of the Parkway and the neighborhood. Negotiations and meetings have continued since action on the rezoning was deferred at the September 12 public hearing. ~i Attached are two letters from Len Boone that include his offer and his proposed design standards. Questions have been raised regarding the density approved by the Board for the Sigmon property and the proposed density for the Beasley property. The questions have to do with the appropriateness of allowing an average density for the property that includes the critical viewsheds, even though they will not be built upon. This is still being reviewed by the staff, but we feel that some incentive is necessary to encourage property owners to cooperate with the County to provide protection for the critical viewsheds. From the beginning, the Parkway Committee encouraged the protection of the viewsheds by allowing the property owners to build the same number of units elsewhere on the property. Critical Viewsheds: The properties comprising the eleven viewsheds have not been advertised for public hearing and cannot be rezoned at this time. However, the Board may consider terms such as building criteria that is consistent with the existing AG-1 zoning. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the Boone offer including the building criteria is a step in the right direction, there are several aspects that we are continuing to discuss. Several points need to be clarified in preparing a consent decree. We are trying to provide some additional protection for the parkway that will still provide Mr. Boone flexibility in developing. These negotiations will probably not be completed until next week. We will have a final report at the Board meeting. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Ref erred To Motion by. ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~ _ 2 7.9 3 0~ ~° ~yh ~ ~ ~H September 24, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: OO'~~ 00~'Qi ~~c. ILL ESTATE DEVELOPERS P.O. BOX 8156 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 (703) 772-3887 Please accept this letter as an addition to the offer our company made by letter of September 10, 1993, as a continuing effort to settle our law suit as it pertains to the property on the North side of the Blue Ridge Parkway. We agree that should the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or its assignees not purchase the critical viewshed property on the North side of the Blue Ridge Parkway within the outlined five-year period, and the property then has five residences constructed on it, then we agree that a deed restriction will be placed on the property requiring the following architectural guidelines. • Roof pitch will be no less than 8/12 pitch. • No garage door would be on the rear of any property (facing directly to the Parkway) • Roof colors would be earth tone. • Stone or earth- tone brick would only be used on the exterior with the exception that stained wood siding could be used (earth-tone color). • No exposed concrete or cinder block • Only unpainted wood fencing would be allowed and no fencing could be placed within 250 feet of the Parkway unless it is of rustic split-rail design consistent with designs seen along the Blue Ridge Parkway. ~- ~ Mr. Elmer Hodge September 24, 1993 Page 2 • Any out buildings would have to have the same architectural styling and materials as the residence and could not be placed on any lot closer than 250 feet of Parkway property. Elmer, I think it is apparent our firm is willing to do everything possible to insure the protection of the Blue Ride Parkway. We would prefer to be placed in a position not to have to build in any critical visit; however, as a property owner, it is unrealistic to expect that we could absorb such a financial loss. It is also unrealistic to think if we were not purchasing the property it would not be developed. Your own staff recognizes that the area has made the transition from rural to urban. That being the case and since there are so few properties that offer good development potential in Southwest County, if we did not develop it, someone else would. Based on our track record in the Roanoke Valley, I feel it is safe to say the Parkway and its visitors are better off having us develop it under these guidelines as opposed to someone else. I hope these final conditions can resolve the issue and all of us can go forward. incerel~y, & LOEB, INC. e Prbsident LB:kh September 10, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: ~'~' r OO'~~ OO'~~ , ~~c. ILL ESTi~TE DE~/ELOPEIZS P.O. BOX 8156 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 (703) 772-3887 In a continued effort to try to avoid having to take our law suit on the Beasley Property to court, we hereby offer Roanoke County the following, which will replace all previous offers of settlement we have made. • We would agree to an average density of 2.5 units per acre for the Beasley Property we are purchasing on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway (the Sigmon/Strauss side). The total density for this north side property would be computed on the total acreage including critical view shed acreage times 2.5 unit to the acre. The tax parcel numbers for this land on the north side of the Parkway are 96.07-01-06 and the portion of 96.02-01-46 on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway (see attached map). • The property on the north side of the Parkway with the exception of the critical view shed property (as defined by Roanoke County and shown on the attached map) would be zoned R-1 and would have all development rights allowed under R-1 with the exception the average density would be as outlined above. • Critical view shed property on the north side will remain its existing zoning, AG-1. • Our company would have the existing law suit dismissed with regard to all the property on the north side of the Parkway. • The law suit would remain in affect as it relates to the property on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway (tax #96.02-01-02, #96.02-01-01, #97.03-02-05, the portion of 96.02-01-46 on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the portion of 97.01-02-17 on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway). However, we would take no action on that law suit for a period of one year from September 28, 1993, in order that we can work with the Blue Ridge Parkway in an effort to secure utilities to this property as well as an agreement on how the "bowl" would be addressed. ~i Mr. Elmer Hodge Page 2 • Our company will agree not to construct any residential homes in the critical view shed areas (see attached map provided by Roanoke County Planning Department showing dimensioned critical view shed area on Beasley Property) on either the north or south side of the Parkway for a period of five years from September 28, 1993, and will further agree that we would during this time period sell these critical view shed properties to the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or their designees at our direct cost as outlined below. However, our offer to sell the critical view shed acreage on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway during the above five year period is contingent on the Blue Ridge Parkway providing an easement and any other necessary approvals without undue red tape to allow utilities necessary for the development of the property to cross from the north side to the south side of the Parkway through the existing concrete culvert where currently proposed. • We would agree that should the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or its designees not purchase the critical view sheds on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway during the five year period mentioned, then we would limit the number of homes that could be constructed on this approximate eight acres to only five homes and would further agree that no residence would be constructed in this critical view shed area within 250 feet of the Parkway property. The Parkway has approximately 200 feet from their road system to our property; and with the 250 feet mentioned above, the Parkway would be assured the five homes that might be constructed would be approximately 450 feet from anyone passing along the Parkway. ~ The direct cost for which we are willing to sell our critical view shed to the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or its designees would include the cost of the land, the cost of the infrastructure that must be placed on that land in order that we can develop our adjoining property as well as any carrying costs or incidental costs incurred in the purchase of any critical view shed property but no profit or overhead expense to our company. We have been asked to define exactly what this cost would be. It is impossible to provide an accurate cost since interest would be accruing on land and infrastructure and would vary from one time period to another. Additionally, no real cost can be determined for infrastructure since we have no engineered plan of development to determine the affect of existing site conditions. Also, the cost of the infrastructure if not installed at time of purchase is likely to increase between that time and the actual time it is installed; but in an effort to provide a general understanding, I will offer the following as a guideline. ~i Mr. Elmer Hodge Page 3 The critical view shed on the north side has approximately eight acres, which today without carrying costs would cost us $15, 000 an acre for a total of $120, 000. It additionally will require the installation of a road at the top of the view shed approximately 930 feet long. We anticipate that a road costs approximately $300 a running foot, and this cost should include the cost of storm drainage, curb and gutter, sewer and water and other utilities that would be required. Half of this road system on the north side critical view shed would apply to lots outside the critical view shed--the other half would not; therefore, only half of the cost should be allocated to the cost of the critical view shed or approximately $150 per running foot times 930 feet of road length, which is $139,500. That amount along with the $120,000 in land cost provide a total cost of the critical view shed on the north side of approximately $259,500 at today's cost. The critical view shed on the south side of the Parkway has approximately 20 acres, which today without carrying costs would cost us $10, 000 an acre for a total of $200, 000 . It additionally will require installation of a road through the view shed of approximately 1700 feet. We anticipate again that the road would cost us $300 a running foot and that this cost should include the cost of storm drainage, curb and gutter, sewer and water and other utilities that would be required. In this instance, the entire cost of the infrastructure through the critical view shed would have to be recaptured since there would be no lots that could use the installed infrastructure. Therefore, the approximate 1700 feet at $300 a running foot would equal $510,000 plus the $200, 000 approximate land cost for a total approximate cost of $710, 000. As you can see under this scenario, our direct cost for the critical view sheds on both sides of the Parkway appear to be $969,500. This figure would include no profit or overhead to our company asswning these costs are accurate. We could not guarantee this amount as the purchase price since we cannot determine the actual cost without engineered drawings. However, if there is a desire to have a not to exceed price, we could say that the not to exceed cost to the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or their designees would be $1,500,000 at today's cost. This not to exceed price will ajust 6% annually prorated. We do not expect the cost to be this much, but obviously have to over estimate in order to provide a not to exceed cost. ~-i Mr. Elmer Hodge Page 4 Therefore, if someone wished to buy them today, we would agree to sell them for $1,500,000. We would further stipulate that once the infrastructure was placed on the property, we would provide documentation to the cost of that infrastructure and to the extend that the infrastructure and land was less than $1,500,000, we would refund any excess. Furthermore, if the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or its designees would wish to purchase one critical view shed as opposed to both, we could at today' s values guarantee a not to exceed price for the north side of $405,000 and a not to exceed cost for the south side of $1,095,000, (each would increase 6% prorated annually). Also, we would again be willing to refund any excess over the actual cost of the land and infrastructure versus what was paid once we had installed the infrastructure and computed its final cost. We would not be willing to sell part of any critical view shed on the north nor part of the critical view shed on the south side. If a view shed is to be purchased, it would be entire amount on that given side. Also as outlined earlier, our offer sell the critical view shed on the south side is conditioned on the easement and other approvals, if any, for the utilities being granted without the undue red tape. • Lastly, in the event that the Blue Ridge Parkway, Roanoke County or its designees wish to purchase either or both of the critical view sheds prior to the installation of the infrastructure across those view sheds, then any conveyance would have to include our right to place easements for utilities, storm drainage and/or storm detention where we deem necessary as well as locate the right of way for any road where necessary (and if the road is to be deeded to the Virginia Department of Transportation, such provisions would also be included) and further, any slope easements required for grading to facilitate the installation of infrastructure would automatically be granted. ~i Mr. Elmer Hodge Page 5 Elmer, again we ask that the Board of Supervisors recognize we have been more than willing to negotiate in good faith and have made substantial compromises. Hopefully this last effort can bring about a successful conclusion to these negotiations. However, if you feel there are additional items that need to be discussed once this proppsal is reviewed, please let me know. s verb truly, NE,~ BE & LOEB, INC . ~ Boon Vice Pre 'dent LB:kh .~ I L~\ Ae ~.. .L y :. x•, Ge ~ ~• a•a 7 rg ` _ 1 ~ ° ' / I \ 2 a ~ p' 3 \ y~gg p.g ~~ ... ig ~ pad ~ p"9 ~_.. :. p ~ •8 / a O e ttt •v t 1 4f / y \ , • ~.~ ~ _ 1 r ~ ~ t. o ~o • S ~~ • ' \ c; '~. ~ ~ c~ _.~ -_. i -•° .~~ ~ ..~ ~ ,' ~ x ~ p'' ~ I O A} ec e~q /`~ ~• o~ ~ ~ ~ °'~ ~ ~ ••~ -- . sa ~~ .a ~+~ r. O 0 ~,g p•~ r•~S ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ we ~ N ~'s x•~ n•a ' c.~ p._ 3' ~ ~ • :.~ k d ~ x y F.~, ~ ,~ ' 0^' +~'a R'~ •'•,•p• ••. ~"~ S• ` th p .;; =~ ~ '° ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 -„ -~ >~ \ ~ IJ o ° "' °9 ,,, ~_~. S p'~ i f ~ •• ~ 8 ~ , °~'. ~'/~ ~~~ ~u ~~ oy ~ ~ ~/~ , ~8 ~' A.~ ~ i// _.~_ ~~r, !` =I ~ \ \ s ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~ a o~ ~ _ ~ , P ~ ._ ~ ! I . ~` ti-- .; , ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ i', r~ 3 ~ ~4 ~2~9 ~ _ ~ ~~ f, -~~ ,~ ~~ ~ i r ~N ~. ;~ _ t -~ -+ --_ ~ ~ ~-, ._.~ f 1`~~-=- __~ ,~~ ~ 1 ~~ . . r -~ ` / `V Y / '• V ~ ~ ~~ 1 Rf /~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ asp \``~' C~ O a \ ., 0 a ;; ~. ~~ 4 d \ . ~~ \\I ~I ~~~ ~a ~1 1 ly C5~ ~~~ V 0/ y ~~ ~- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY TO SAID MAPS (COTTON HILL) WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 91493-11 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on June 1, 1993 and July 6, 1993, and have made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993 and the second reading and public hearing was 1 ~~ held on September 14, 1993 and continued to October 12, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That "1992 Zoning District Maps of Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (A) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to AR, Agricutural/Residential District: 96.02-1-1 96.02-1-2 97.03-2-5 a p/o 97.01-2-17 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway) a p/o 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) (B) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG-l, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to R-1, Low Density Residential District: 96.07-1-6 a p/o 96.02-1-46 (north of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) 2. That said map or maps entitled "ZONING CHANGES BONSACK" and "ZONING CHANGES COTTON HILL AND POAGES VALLEY ROAD" (dated July 21, 1993) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is 2 ~~ directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. c:\wp51\agenda\code\mtton.hil 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~. 1 '~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST FOR / PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~,eu-s(.~, f~~-~.Q-ray ~ mnin~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII,L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed 6y the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a ppresentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~r~ Irv 1~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ADDRESS _t,.)a o ~,., ~-- N~~.rf- ~?c , 1~0 ~rsx ~ z z ~ -7 Qor, /~ aYoa PHONE ~ 70 3) 3~3 - 2-~fS/ Iiilllilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllil Wllllllllilllllllllilllilllllllllllliillillilllllllllliillllillllllllliillilllllllllllllllllllliilllllllllillllillil111111111111~111 _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ,~_ __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ ARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS CO NTS _ PUBLIC HE Ml~~ _ SUBJECT: - __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. W~~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to =_ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED GROUP v SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -_ -_ NAME ~'r~ ~~ Ps~J- -_ _ ADDRESS c PHONE ~rnmni~mrnm!~n~i~iiiiiiiiiillii~l~'~ u~rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~r~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - - - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST __ / IC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS _ PUBL _ c SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco ize me during the p ~ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each s esker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ with the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGALINTLED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c ,~ NAME 1 ~ ~ l~ ~A ~ ~~ ADDRESS ~ ~ . ~C ~ (~ N C~~1 S ~ ~~ PHONE ~c~ ~ S / ~4~ ~~ ~~ ~'- I III ~ '~ .~ ...., 1`~atlon.~l I'a~rks ~I,,.,,.,,LI,.„.I~ ~. ,. anc~ Consei-vatioil Association ,II,I,;.~.~',Ilk, STATEMENT OF DON BARGER SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR NATIONAL PARKS AND CONSERVATION ,ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OCTOBER 12, 1993 Good evening. I am Don Barger, Southeast Regional Director of the National Parks and Conservation Association (NPCA). NPCA was founded in 1919, three years after the creation of the National Park System, by Stephen Mather, first director of the National Park System, Our mission for almost 75 years has been to promote the protection, enhancement and public understanding of the National Park System. I am here this evening because I wanted to try to impress upon each of you the importance of the decision before you, not just to Roanoke County, but to the future of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the park system and of our country. We live in the most rapidly changing society in the history of the Earth. The way in which we look at land use adjacent to our public lands is being pressed to keep pace with that evolution. Historically, the nation has gone from colonial times of land grants from the king of England to the Homestead Act that launched fleets of prarie,schooners across the seemingly endless plains. The justification of "manifest destiny" was used to give free land to the railroads and grazing, mining, and timber rights to developers in the name of national interest. The Homestead Act just passed into history seven years ago and we are still operating under a hardrock mining law that was signed into existence by President Ulyses S. Grant. In the East, the illusion of endless land vanished long ago and today, you are being asked to make decisions based on things called "viewsheds" and "visitors' experience." As the importance of these things has grown, so has the need for positive action to protect them. The states grant their local communities the power to zone for appropriate land use as they see fit. The federal government does not havethis ability, nor should they. It is imperative that local communities act with foresight in relation'to development which will impact these resources. A study conducted in 1987 found that the Blue Ridge Parkway generated $1.3 billion a year in direct tourist dollars. It created $98 million in tax revenues to the bordering counties as well as supporting 27,000 jobs. AAA estimates that every daily visitor to your area brings you $57.07 each day. This is "clean" income that does not require a discharge into your streams or an investment in schools or residential services. J776 Massachusetts Avenue, N.A~(/., Washington, ll.C. ZU03(-1 )O=~ '1'clcj~honc (2O2) "3-Nl'CA((i7 ??) • Fax (2U2) 65)-O(i50 • I' A I N 1 1 I~ I I N Y 1 1. 1' (. l l I) Y A I' . P Greenways such as the Blue Ridge Parkway are an asset in and of themselves. Study after study have shown that the existence of greenways increases adjacent property values and, therefore, tax revenues. Greenways link up parks and byways that preserve habitat, provide recreation and preserve the kind of places that Americans are increasingly seeking. Visitation to the national parks (and to state parks) has increased by over 33%, more than 3 times the increase in the population, in the last decade. The federal government did not purchase the land for the creation of the Blue Ridge Parkway. It was bought by the states of Virginia and North Carolina and then gifted to the American people, to be managed by the National Park Service. Both states recognized the wisdom of the investment. In the 1930's, no one even conceived of the idea that some day clusters of houses called "subdivisions" would be crowding at the edges of this scenic rural route. We are the last generation that will have the opportunity to make many of the decisions that will determine the future character of the Blue Ridge Parkway and other special places that we have collectively found deserving of preservation. When all is said and done, you must ask yourself, "Did we protect the Parkway?" The concept of "environmentally sustainable development" is not a compromise between two opposites; this approach almost always results in a compromise which satisfies no one. Decisions must be made based on your vision of what you want to have 50 years from now. The issue is not one of stopping growth, but of guiding it in a wayroach produces the optimal benefit to the community in the long run. One app is to establish design standards for development that does occur within sight of the Parkway. Architect Carlton Abbott whose father designed the Blue Ridge Parkway, has prepared a draft set of design criteria that NPCA believes the County should review and implement. As for the immediate matter at hand, the Beasley farm, NPCA continues to support the position that the County should work for a way to allow the "critical viewsheds" to remain completely undeveloped. As it is, we fear that the viewsheds, as currently defined, are too small to provide genuine protection of these views. The areas defined as "sensitive" seem to have been dropped completely out of the debate, but they are equally important to preserving the character of the Parkway. NPCA would urge the County to re-examine these viewsheds and adopt a Parkway Overlay zone that would satisfy the protection issue for the entire class of lands which impact directly on the Parkway. After the current zoning matter is decided, NPCA would urge the county to work closely with the National Park Service to find means to discourage any immediate building in the critical viewsheds until a long term solution can be worked out with the community. The actions taken by this Board have served to elevate the issue of adjacent land use to a regional level and NPCA looks forward to working with all interested parties for strategies that will serve to ensure that future generations will continue to find it a valuable experience to drive the Blue Ridge Parkway. WIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllll~ a - _ __ c AGENDA ITEM NO. -_ APPE CE REQUEST =_ NG ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ ,/PUBLIC HEARI _ -_ F FDA///I~G- _ -_ SUBJECT: D n l DU ~~ L D E l3 c w d like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me during the _ I oul p g _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ _ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c fiiifi~iiitiin~~ii~iriiiii~ii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~iiiiiiil~iliiiii~ii~liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiililiullllllillllll~l ~iiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ~3 AGENDA ITEM NO. c c APPE CE RE VEST - .` Q - - ~ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COA~IlVIENTS c SUBJECT: ~~ ~; ~~i = i = - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me rin e - P g g - __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an Individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ - - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ c -' ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c __ with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING Ol ~ BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = = = = = = = - = = ~ = - - NAME ~u e_ ~ o ~w ci ~-~ ADDRESS _ ~ ~ Ona ~~.~ n ~, re.1 e.-. ~ - 1.~ - - _ - - - _ - PHONE _ 9~ 9 - a ~ 9 ~ - _ _ fiii~iininin~nn~iiiil~iiir~iii~ii~iiiii~iiliiiriiiiriii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~l ~Illilllilllillllillillillllllllllllllliilllllilllllllllllllillllllililiilllllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllllllll1111111111111~111 _ - _ - _ - ~ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMIlVIENTS c = SUBJECT: ~~~~" ` % r ,~`~ -~ { ", -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: =_ _ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to _ _- do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ c - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - with the clerk. '" __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP e SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GRDUP ALLO tY1NG THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - t~~~nm~mnnn~~~nrnm~nnnti~nm~nnnminin~ii~~ititnn~m~iiii~iiiifiiiiiiiil~' WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllll~11~ - - - - J- _ _ _ __ _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. = c _ - _ - APPE CE REQ ST _ - _ - _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS I~oo~ ~ ~rJe ~ ~o e~, lv N - SUBJECT: ~ n/C. -2Z6 r 6 __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ WHEN CALLED TO THE +LE~C~TERN, I WILL GIvVE~~MY NAAME AND ADDTRESS 1 ~~ 1 ~16v~~~. ~ ~iGi'.aiE 1"nl ~~ID~ ~ Y Y11~ OJ VT~I~vJh*'~~ s.1 ~r L,~ BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to = do otherwise. - c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments mus Abe directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audie ce members is not allowed. __ ^ Both s Bakers d the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ p ~- ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - w-th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK fiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiiinniiii~fiiii~iiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiitiii~iliiiiiiii~lliiiii~l Wlilllllllllllllllllllillillllilllllllllilllfllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllliilllllllllllillllllililllllllllllllllllllll~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ - AGENDA - - ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - APPE - _ _ - CE REQUEST - c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - ~ ~. - SUBJECT: -efti - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = c - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = I~'OR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO .~ SIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - - ^ Each s Baker will be - P given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. - Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. -. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - = ^ - Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. ~ - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c - _ -_ c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - _, - - - - - - - - -_ NAME ~j aC V'Y' ~ ~ r ~ __ __ - - - ADDRESS 5~l ~ ~ - l - - PHONE ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ - I I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ 1UIIIIIIIIIi111iliNlilillllliliilliliillllllllilllllllllllllllilllllillil111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I Ililllllilll~ - - _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS SUBJECT: ~ ~ ~ Z~VLt,. ~~`~ C E'.(. ~ ~~ I<'--~ __ I woald like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment Whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED Gr~tOUP o - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c mm~iil~liilllilllllll~ll Wllillllllllllilllllillilllillllllllllilllllillllllllliilllllllillllllllllllllllliilllllilillllllllllllllllilllliillllllilllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - -_ APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS _ = SUBJECT; L ~ ~v ~v~sw ~ ~ /V.L~~~ .~t'=~ L. r --. u -_ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: '- _ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. - -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING OAI BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - inn I~mm~~nnrn~IlNllll~illlllllltlll -~ 111111 WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111UU - ~ - - - - - -_ -_ - - - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. w ~ r ~ ~_ ~_ ~ ~ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ o ~ /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS n j~dd SUBJECT: I u~"'~ ~ I_~~~~ h2_ s ~~ ~~ ~~~~c ~~e Z~~ ,l _ -~ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the muting on the above matter so that I may comment. WYi~IEN CALLED TO ':'1'HHE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AC.Rk:E TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ..~ vv~th ±he clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c -_ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - ~ _ __ -_ mllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllilllillilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllilliillllllillllllll1111111111111111111~ ~illlllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllliilllliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIII~111 _ _ _ _ _ ~o _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST ~UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ,.~ __ SUBJECT: f'~~ ~~"~.. j ~~~ 2~~j ~C J ~ ~ ~;~t~~t-~ _ J _ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ -_ '- do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. _ - _ mlllll11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ~Illlllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllllllilllll~ _ - _ ~ - - ~ - _ - _ ~ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - = SUBJECT: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`~ r ~~'~'~'~ - - - - -_ c - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the - - meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ,~ - - ~" = BELOW: - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. - Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. - __ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - - __ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ - _ fillilllllllllllilillllllllllilllllliliilllillllllllllllillllllllllillillllliilllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll~l ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiii~~~~ _ _ ,~ __ __ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: 1 ~~`-~- ~~~~-~o~oc~- Gam- ~~-- ~~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE IIECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE ~UI;tZELINE.S LISTED __ BELOW: c ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe c speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c - decide the hme limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING Ol ~l BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = - fittiiniii~nin~~~~r~~iiiiiinitii~tiiiiiriliirliii~iiliriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ WI111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _ _ ~~ _ __ c AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE CE REQUEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE / CITIZENS CONIlI~NTS __ _ c SUBJECT: ~n -- I< ~,~:.a ~ P L 4 e ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~-:2-% f - i~ c s~ ~ ! ~..~_~ ~ ~ ~ z L ,~ , .~~ _ ~, __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to = do otherwise. c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. '" __ ^ INDIVIDUAL:S SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK __ -_ mllllitlliilllllilillllilllllllliliillllllltl11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~"I Wllliil1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~111 _ - _ - _ ~~ - _ - _ - _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS c - - - - - - -_ - - - SUBJECT: av -~ ,` l~ - - - - - - ~ - - - -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to - - - do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c -_ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - _ - - - _ - - - - - - _ - s ~ fi~n~l~nnfi~~~mmnl~ir~nfinnrnntinri~m~mmnnr~iiiiiiiii~ii~ii~nn~m~mt~n~iii~liiiiiliilliiii~'~ Wlllllllllilllllillililllillllllllllilllllllilliltliillillllllllilllllilllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllllillllllllllllllli~ll) _ ~ _ _ / _ AGENDA ITEM NO. = = _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - ~ - = LIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - _. - - SUB,jECT: ~. l~c~-~~ s--_ ~t~G`~ ~2~Z_a ~- _ ~ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _= meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = - decide the time I~mit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ . ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. -_ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPI?AKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORCuI1'VTLED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = _ = _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _.._ - - - L~~ _ = NAME ` ~' ~~ I ~- - - - - - - - - -_ - ADDRESS ~ Z-~ ~'~ ~ S ~~ W ~~-~.-~-~`~ - - - - -_ -_ - - - - PHONE ~ ~ Z- ~~~ ~ - 111111111111111111111"! Wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrr~r~ii~ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS _ t, i SUBJECT: ~d ~ ~ Q c9 4.k --~ ~~~ 7VJ -' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: ^ Each s esker will be iven between three p g , to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their ppoint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON .$EHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c __ _ _ _ _ N~ ~~~I 1215~~ -_ __ _ _ _ _ ADDRESS `~ ~ 2 B ~ ~- ~ S s (~ ~ ~/ C; l ~ ~ ~-~- _ __ NONE `~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ `~ ~ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - = AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - - _ - - - - - - SUBJECT: ,~~~ ~,,,, ~ ~ - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ ^ Each s esker will be iven between the = p g , r e to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. _ - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED GROUP e SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ - - - _ - _ - t~~n~ninnnnnm~lrln~fnfrnmrnn~nnmm~nmiiiiii~~ni~nrnnmmn~iniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~'~ . -~_ o -- THAN~YOU FORCALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS IMPORTAN T ISSUE. I AM IMPRESSED WITH HOW FAR MR. BOONE HAS GONE IN SCALING BACK HIS PROPOSAL TO SATISFY THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND PARKWAY ISSUES. BY ALLOWING TIME FOR THE PUBLIC TO HAVE ITS SAY, A BETTER PLAN HAS EMERGED THAN WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. THERE IS A LESSON HERE FOR ~` ALL OF US: IF YOU TRUST THE PROCESS AND TRUST THE PEOPLE, YOU WILL BE BETTER OFF IN THE LONG RUN. ~ ~~~ ~ L~°-~- ~ HOW TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROTECT THE NATIONAL (~ . ASSET THAT IS T~ BLUE ~IDGE PARKWAY WITH ~-I,E NATIONAL TREASURE ,~;d.«:,'.s.o-~+~, THAT IS OUR CONSTITUTION AND`''THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS CONTAINED IN ~ ~ ~-~ OUR CONSTITUTION, IS DIFFICULT. MOST RECENT PROPOSAL BY MR. BOONE BALANCES IT AS WELL AS POSSIBLE. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DESERVES OUR THANKS AFTER YOU VOTE TO SUPPORT WHAT IS CLEARLY THE BEST SOLUTION. # # # 1~IIIIIIIIIIIIilllilllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllilllllli11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ig c _ _ _ _ _ _ c = _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST _ -PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS = -_ _ p - SUBJECT: er4S IBC zo~- ~ ~„/ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to ,_ __ do otherwise. - - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized s speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP e c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ - - _ - - - - - /~, r - - - NAME ~ r - 4~i v I - ~ - _ _ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ _ - ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ 1 I-~i~~lde~i ©o~s ~~e . - - _ - _ _ - PHONE I ` ~1 ~ 1- (~ 8 ~ ~ '- mm~n~nrnnininmmn~mm~niiiiliiliill~iillllil~ u~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiriiii~iiiiiiiiiiuiii~iiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ _ _ - - _ .iq = _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - = - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - _ __ _ -- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - __ SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the =_ = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS POR 'I'IIE R_1JC0 I AGREE TO ABYDE BY TI:E GUIDEI.IPdE3 LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to - -_ '- do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. - Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -_ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. - - -_ - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - -_ - ~ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - - - - - _ - fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiii~ ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - _. - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - ~ - ~/ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - _ - SUBJECT: at~~--~ ~~ow.~ ~- ~F~? ~2-~-z ~ ,.,! ,.~ ~ - _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes - to comment - whether speakm~ as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time Limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to - __ do otherwise. _ __ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -_ - - - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ - - vnth the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN OR = - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROMI THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - _ - _ - _ - NAME ®)~x n--~ ~ ~ ~~ c~ ~ ~~i - - - ~ - - - ADDRESS - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - - PHONE ____~~ -( ~ ~ ~~~ - Il[Iillitlttttttlttlillllltltiilittttttlllllitilttillllillllltllillllllillillllililliilililtliltlllillillililillllllllllll I11111~1 ~II11111111111111111111111111111111!lIIIIIIII IIIII111111IIIIiIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111l~tttIIIIIIIIIIIIiII lillllllllillll~ _ - _ - _ - _ - ~I _ - _ - _ - = AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ - - APPE CE REQUEST _ -_ -_ UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS SUB CT: __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ` -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ` __ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF .4N ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO E _ _ TH CLERK __ __ mlllllllllllillllllillllllilllllllilllillillllillllllllilllllllllilllllillllllilillllllllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllltllm ~Illillllllllllllllllllllllllilllifllllllillilllllliilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllllllllilllllll~ _ - _ - _ - _ Q?a - _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS __ SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco 'ze me Burin the P gm g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED =_ BELOW: __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ ~, _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a prese:~tation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING O1V BEHALF OF AN ORGANI7,ED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK fiiiiin[111nnt11Etlillllllllllirlrtlllllfllllrtlttnrtir1111111111111111111t111niltltfllllllimm~nl~llllll~llllll~llll~~~l~ ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~111 _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ APPE CE REQUEST =_ IC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ PUBL _ -_ SUBJECT: 2 c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I ~4GREE TO ABIDE RY '1~'I~E GLTIDEL!~NE'S LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ will be iven between three to five minutes to comment _ Each speaker g _ whether speaking as an Individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority olgthe Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF A1V ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ .~, PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - fi~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~111 u~iiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitii~u ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST =_ NG ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS c _ PUBLIC HEARI _ c __ SUBJECT: .~~- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me Burin the _ P g g _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each s esker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whethep speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to '- do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized =_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - _ - _ - _ - NAME o N ~ a ~~ -_ ADDRESS ~?~ Z - _ - _ -_ - PHONE `" I ~~ ~ `~ `10 niminnnm~mm~i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiii~'~ ~iiiiu~iiii~~~i~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiii~iiitiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~iiiiiiiiiiiii~i~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ - __ .__ -_ c AGENDA ITEM NO. _ ~'~ APPE CE REQUEST ~ ~ `~ ~ __ c NG ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS _ PUBLIC HEARI _ =_ SUBJECT• c c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco ize me Burin the ,_ P 1~ g _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment -whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to -_ do otherwise. - -- ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. -_ ^ DVDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGAIVTLED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c c ALLOtiYING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c NAME ADDRESS 7~ -_ _ PHONE ~~~ ~ ~~b If~t1111~ Wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrirri~ii~ _ _ _ _ - -_ __ ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - APPE CE REQUEST =_ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS C011~~NTS SUB.TECT: Q I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c c ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c __ with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK im~inrnmn~n~niii~~iiiiiiiiiiiiii~' 1~IIIIIIilllilillllllillllllilllllillllilllilllli11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _ _ _ _ _ ~S _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE RE VEST - Q _ __ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS ---- SUBJECT. -~ c c = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: -_ ~ s _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to = __ do otherwise. _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. v _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ V = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED GROUP e SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ _ -_ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ c = c - ~ _ ~- / NAME ~ /f-/~ ~~ f- ~b ~ 5 -_ ADDRESS ~ ~ I ~a v~ yL j,~ ~ PHONE ~~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ Z_--~~ ~mnmlmnrniimmn~ln~mm~ i l i l l i i l i l i l i l l i i ~! Wllilllllillilllllllllllllllillliillllllllllllllllllllllilllllililliilllilllllllllilillllllllllillllllillllillilllilllllllllllli~ _ _ _ of _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c - _ - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - - - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS c -_ - - SUBJECT: DJI~~~/fl~`~ ~~G/~C~ - -_ -_ - =_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ - = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: c - -_ c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ .- ~i - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP e SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - _ - __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - -_ _ - - - _ - - NAME P,f~ ~i2 /~ w~iF=~ - - - - _ - _ - - - - - _ - ~ = ADDRESS ~ Zc~ ~~far~ c.~ ~,~C~ ~'~.,s• uJ ~ , ~oH' - - - -_ __ - _ - - PHONE 9~ ~'- ~ Zvi '~ - - r~rnnmm~nmm~rn~nnn~nnrnnmrmmiminmm~tt~mn~iiiiiiiiiiilillilil~'~ Wllllillllllililllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllilillliililllllilllllllllllllilll~ _ - _ - - - ~ - - v - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - -_ _ _ _ _ APPE - - CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COIVIlVIENTS - - - - - - - - = SUBJECT: - - _ __ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WIN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five m' = mutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to c do otherwise. - - _. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. V c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ vnth the clerk. - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - ~ - - - _ _ _ _ - u - _ NAME c' l - ~ ~ s -~ - _ - - - - - _ _ - ADDRESS ~S ~~ j ~ ~ ~~ - _ - - PHONE ~~~ ~"~" 7 ~ ~ - _ - _ - - ----- - IUlililllilllllllllllllllllllllillllillllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllliilillillilllllillllllllilllilillllililllilllllllilllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - _ _ -_ APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _~ r ~ - ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - - - - - - -_ SUBJECT: ~ ~~~.-.,- ~. .-r--~~~ = __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: c c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - do otherwise. -_ c _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - V = _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - =_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ - -_ - - - - - - NAME `/ .~ ~ r ,~,~1,~~~r '~ _ - - - - - - _ - _ - - ADDRESS ~ G` `,, , f ~ a ~ ~ : ~-~- ,i ~ ~ , - - - - - _ _ - - ~ -~ - - `~ ~ ~ U = - - PHONE - _ - - _ - _ - IllIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIiliI1I111illlIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIiII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII IiIiIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIiiIIIIIIIIIiI~(~J __ ~a =_ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. __ APSE CE ~tE UEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ®RDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -~ c SUBJECT: ;% 5 z ~--~. ~~_ ~ ~ _ =_ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO TIC LECTERI'+1, I Vt~ILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. . __ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ vnth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING 017 BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOI`r~i'~'G TFIE INDI"vIDIlAL 10 REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,- _ _ -_ NAME ~ ~~,,. ~ /~ ,J` ~', ,, ~ ~ 'f.~..~~ ADDRESS ~~ ~~~ ti ~~='~`~-;,~=' , '~= -_ PHONE mllllllillilli{Illlilillllllillllllllllllllitllllltllllllllllllllllilllllillillllillilllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllm Wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrriirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~ _ _ _ .~3 = _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~i ~ f - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ - ~/ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - - - - _ - ~r __ /~ wQ - _ y _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = c = - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ =_ - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP e c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = _ = _ = - _ - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - NAME - - ADDRESS 7 ,- ~ .~ ~, ~ y 3-3 - - - - _ _ NONE _ l ~v -~) 3 ~ ~ - 71 ~.~ __ Iit111n1i1111it1t11~~11111tltllilillllilitlll I~! Wllillllllllillllllllllllllililillillllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111~- __ - - ? - _ - _ - .3 S - - ~ - = AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS c - - - - - - - ~ ,~, = SUBJECT: -_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = c = - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c = - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - - - vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - ~~ - - _ - ` - - - - ` - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - NAME I~ . ~ j ~J - _ _ - eti - - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /1 - - ADDRESS ~/~ / Caf ~- ~ lc~D, - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - PxoNE ~~ `~ ~ `~ 3 7~ - nmm~nmmmn~~m~i~iliiiiiii~~liiii~'~ IUilllllllllliillilillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllillilllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllll~j11 _ _ 3s _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA I'T'EM NO. - - - _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS c - - - SUBJECT: = - ,, - -_ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ c -' _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to - do otherwise. - - ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANTLED GROUP v SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME .. - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS - - - - - -_ - - - - "" PHONE nlfinmm~mmmmmmimnl{Inttnnm1111111111111111111~1 WIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllillllllllilliill1111111111111IIIIillilllllililllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllilU11 - _ _ ~ - _ ~ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS CO1VIII~NTS SUBJECT: __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - do otherwise. __ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments c vv~th the clerk. _. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = ~~ e ~ _ ~ fi~nnnmmmnn~iii~mm~rnnnnriimmn~~i~~mi~~ii~ii~tiiiiilinifltQlliinti~iilliilliiliiiiii~~ ~ ~N \ \~l` \ ~\ \N~ ~~ ~~ E j ~~ 1q 9 a;^ CS =~ ~' ;~ C~ . ~ itY ~iyz~ oppo O~~' C _ trig R~ f °z ~~ } $O~Zd 3 Z~ a~,d Yelp l ~~~~ trarlt :Y~~ ~ ~~11 ~e 1a~y~,`i CO Z ~ rd Z ,Qo4~ mar ~ ~ ,~ aY a a'i'd ~~ . C,nay 0oatd , agg Qat1t e pea~tiY rg Ri tr date6g t tre slug ptoteGt eY xrow to a o~ to tr ftyerd a wa`1 Z cap', t~ tY'at GrargOg Z am a of ~lydlt~g WaY trat ~o U~ 5U e ~o '.~aXe e55 $rY Data Gov g ~~°C waY iY' tre $ g ~~,eY ~oot,e . tr re YaLx Ga~tion tease a y~r ~t• rat or off- t wart t° out ~o ° ee~ert w e Baia ~ ~YOYn orlg~t 1 eY ate ar to an ayt ~g plar '~' g ~ is~,b1Q ggn , z tr tia r r ~~e e ~ wrat o .~eg° explay r~ Y'° Dula b ~ t eXa°tl~ and t me to vld pe oof a w d tra r 2°,~ing ~ ~yted tree Wo o tre t ~e gay f, 1 Dore y xwaY gore ~ ibl0' datY o ~ paZ p~ .rig ,pov.t~ on W`~'er ~lr ' o~ tre 11 part o Jld ~e ~ tre e rill gla,e a g~a ore w t fro o~ tr wr rottr ~rlY ~ttle ~• 50 fee ctegt ed `~itr tre 4atkWaY ' aYeg a 1 ~rar 2 Duet tre a.s pleas icY' r0 d .tre re edges Yn pe Gl°get would be wad • Z w ysia , wr At ~- vld ~re`I 4atK rad w° _ tre ~ re rQ 1,°v5e5 t°QeYtY ~to~` a,G vtra 0 et aY p aw aY t epg w~, tY' d w, QaYKw rill slde ea rym t° woc`delcd go woraete ca, own a8x t ~ Z al d s 1 1 dgayd atd Z w rid let l.. alga ettY wov e woe ftGi r ,, °~ ityGa wa`I prop would a ec ~~Pf ~ t~ ire tre 4atx r~`~7e$ e dl tart o,~lY ~,~o~ o zre ~f tr tefetYyr9 get baGX tre rill gnd pawed ~ foot t o~ 1,, a 25p Greg ,,K,no~. tre tre over t to w gr So 1 li_~ , 1` ,~,- ~=r~: 4~=i J I I°! OL I I ! F'OHl U=it<E , '-!H. i_~~-_~- This turned out to be apprax 930 feet from the center line uL ~trc~ Farkway. It became apparent: to me that structures built 450 Legit from the center line of the Parkway would not be over the crest of the hill and would be fully visible, not mostly hidden as suggested by Mr. Boone. The county should certainly require that a survey be made to determine exactly where sat back lines will put the houses.. Tf~ his should be done for the Lull 2, 2a8 feet of this viewshed/~so~ at.~b~t",~"h`~e,,'' Board will be able to visualize accurately what the proposed development will look like when it is finished. The Board should also find out whether the 250 foot setback is to apply to the 392 foot long area to the right of the "critical" area and the 900 foot loncf area on the left. It should also get a realistic estimate of what loads and how many houses will be placed on the Parkway side of the long h111 and what will be the nature of the cutouts made to create level ground for the roads and the houses. At tt-~is point I am not optimistic about how this beautiful Parkway viewshed will look when it is developed. Z am hopeful that we will learn from this experience and will find better solutions for the remaining viewsheds in Roanoke County and the many other c:our~ties that border this unique treasure. Wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrirrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~~t~ - - _ _ - - _3 = _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. c _ = - - - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ __ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMII~NTS - - - - - - - - - - SUBJECT. - - - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED =_ BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, snd will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - _ ~_ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP e SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GRDUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - NAME _ _ .~ - - - _ - - - - ADDRESS = - - - - - - PHONE - _ - _ - _ - _ - - _ .. - _ - ~lillllllillllillillllllilllllilllllllllllllllillllllllillllllillllllllllililllllilllllllillllllllllllllllllllilillliiilllllllll~!!,I _ - _ ~~ ~ ~~- _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ - ' APPE CE REQUEST _ __ __ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS SUBJECT: -_ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: _ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. - c c = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ vv~th the clerk. ^ INDIVID UAL.S SPEAKING Ol ~l BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GR 0 UP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - ~IIiI111111111NNYU1111111111111111lIIIIIIIIIINIIillllllii111llllllllliililillilliilillilillllllilllllllllillllllllilillilll~ ~_ . .~ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ G ORDINANCE /~' CITIZENS COA~III~NTS _ PUBLIC EIEARIN _ S ~• UB~ • -_ I would like the Chairm n of the Board o upervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WII.L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ ^ Iysch s ker -will be , 'ven between three to five minutes to comment -~-hetherspeaking as an 'individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, :and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oi~the Board to __ do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c ^ Ali comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _. with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEARING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ GIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ PLEASE PRINT LE _ .- _. ._ _ - _ _ .~ , ~, .,~w ~, ~~ COU NTY ADM I NISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~~xxY# ~ ~~ ~~xxY~.C~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 Mr. W. Darnall Vinyard P. O. Box 295 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Vinyard: October 15, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY' MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Industrial Development Authority. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a four-year term. Your new term began on September 26, 1993, and will expire on September 26, 1997. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rior to your participation on this Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have the oath administered, and he has requested that you bring this letter with you. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~ `'~ H. O el~~'__uzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors HOM/bjh Enclosures cc: Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary, IDA Steven'A. McGraw, Clerk of Circuit Court ® Recycled Paper ~ pOAN ,1, ti• z , ~- ~ D O 2 a 1838 COU NTY ADM I NISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 October 14, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Trudy Jenzer Department of Housing and Community Development 501 North Second Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Ms. Jenzer: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101293-7.e of support recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, y'Y~ ~I-, .~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ~,, P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 if~ f~1 V ® Recyded Papa- ~~: #~' ~~ ;' l~ ~~~F' ~.~ ~ . COU NTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 October 14, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL 'FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGLSTERW- DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOLlJNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOMINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAG~T~y~ p~ HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERU~L DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 C1~.~~xxt# ~#~ ~~x ~ x~~.C~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 The Honorable C. Virginia House of P. O. BoX 459 Vinton, VA 24179 Richard Cranwell Delegates Dear Delegate Cranwell: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101293-5 supporting your efforts for regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Econ Dev Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator The Honorable G. Steven Agee The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum The Honorable A. Victor Thomas The Honorable J. Brandon Bell The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo ® Relycied Paper ~ P AN ,~, F 2 O 2 a r sa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 October 14, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY' MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN GAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTERWL. DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Charles S. Robb The Honorable John Warner The Honorable Rick Boucher The Honorable Robert W. Goodlatte The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell The Honorable G. Steven Agee The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum The Honorable A. Victor Thomas The Honorable J. Brandon Bell The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101293-7.f supporting the elimination of unfunded mandates by the State and Federal Government. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Municipal League Virginia School Boards Association ® R~,ydad P~- ..- ,, 1A~~~ ~~~ ~;~~, ,~ ~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 October 15, 1993 n BOARDOF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY MINNIX. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L..JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR. CATAWaIA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Roanoke Regional Airport 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 2401112-1148 Dear Ms. Shuck: Attached is a copy of Action No. 101293-3 approving an Amendment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract. This action was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~~c.~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council C1~.~~xx~# ~~ ~~xx~~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 ®Recyded Paper ~i ir'~F' ~: COU NTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 ~~~~# ~~ ~~x~~ ~ ~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 October 14, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL'FUZZY MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTp1IAL DISTRCT LEE B. EDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILL MAGI87ERIAL DISTRICT BOS L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAWi71DMM. ggTRK,-r EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWBA MAGISTiRY1L DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGIfT101IA~, DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable Gentlemen: Charles S. Robb John Warner Rick Boucher Robert W. Goodlatte C. Richard Cranwell G. Steven Agee Clifton A. Woodrum A. Victor Thomas J. Brandon Bell Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101293-7.g supporting the consideration of the Roanoke Valley I-73 Corridor Alternative. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Transportation ® Relyebd Ps~r 4 ~ ~ , .~ ~,~ ~~ _ GIs C~~~xxY# ~~ .~~xxti~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COU NTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HOOGE (703) 772-2004 October 14, 1993 0 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. OOELL'FUaY MINNUL, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDGY, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DIS7RIC~ EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR. CATAWS/1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGIS'TERAAL. DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Jeffrey Echols, Virginia Department P. O. Box 3071 Resident Engineer of Transportation Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Echols: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101293-4 for approval of County-State agreement for industrial access relating to Valley TechPark. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ®R.~yclw P.ae- OCTOBER 12 PH - Rezoning of Beasley Property - Year End Report 2nd - Easement-Forensic Lab Reso-Pet Overpopulation Request for W.S.- Tours Proc.- Red Ribbon Week 1st - Declaring Pinkard Court Surplus VDOT Revenue Sharing Reduction Enplanement Surveys September 30, 1993 RE: TOURS FOR SUPERS Other than the airport, the things you want the Supers to see are in west County -- reservoir, DC landfill, SG landfill. Why not move a regular Board meeting to one of the Glenvar schools? If the meeting finished by 5:00, they could then tour whatever you wanted them to see. Also, people in west County probably would appreciate having a meeting in their area. If you did it at the high school, government teachers might like to have their students attend. MH r ~, t F'~ ! ~ "~ t ~ '~ .a-. '~,~„e { i ~ ' ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ /j ues t !~J S`'~ SP ~..~.r a / E Vey f - mac? .____ Number: 309162 Posted: 10/01/93 10:11 Type: Regular Message Received: Subject: Pinkard Court From: MHA - Mary Allen To: TLH - Terry Harrington This message was sent to the following destinations: 1 User:TLH - Terry Harrington 2 User:SMP - Sue Patterson-Bane ECH would like to go fd and donate it to TAP of moves out. d and declare Pinkard Court Rec Center surplus ive March or April or whenever the rec staff However, it wants to make the donation now. He asked that a board report be prepared for first and second reading for 10/12 and 10/26 declaring the facility surplus and donating it. Let me know if that's a problem. Otherwise I'll place it on the 10/12 agenda. LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, to receive public comments and suggestions on a proposal to amend the zoning classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.02-01-01, 96.02-1-2, a portion of 97.01-2-17 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway), a portion of 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) and 97.03- 2-5 from AG-1 to AR and to amend the zoning classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.07-1-6 and a portion of 96.02- 1-46 (north of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) from AG-1 to R-l. Maps depicting the location of all of these parcels are available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 24, 1993 maw, ~ . Q~e Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, September 28, 1993 Tuesday, October 5, 1993 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2005 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 AYES-BLOT F.['~~l~ NAYS-LBE 3. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of a Water and Sewer Easement from Dairymen, Inc. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 0-92893-10 BI.T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Vinyard Park. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney) 0-92893-11 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC J. APPOINTMENTS ' 1. Grievance Panel ~~~,. i r~ ~~~' t--- ~ ~~ ,~ I :~- 2. Industrial Development Authority HCN NONIINATED DARNELL VINYARD TO AN EXPIRING 9/26/97 3. Planning Commission 4. Regional Cable TV Committee IC CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA 6 O --I a r I N 0 0 ~ wI ~ I rnl ~i ~I c.,l NI F I ~ Z7 D ~ I I A ~ m 1 A ~ v I .Z7 ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~l I ~7 (/1 ~ I .Tl Cl ~ I A f'1 N i d ~ I I maru I zoo mzrv N I I mAO, mrN Z -aOo NON O~+fr*1N Wmw t~J13N Or maN G~ I I A- AD I w ru ^~-m.~ mr=o ~`d~ A ror-m mz ° ~ ... ~ z I I I e I I I I -~ r- ~ ~' I I o I ~ ° o ° i I i~ I o o I ~ I `v I O I ~ I (fi O 0 ~~~ ~-- ~-- -~ ~T~ ~+-I O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ° ~ ~+ I w I m 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o I ° ° ~ ~ - o I Wo I p, O I I O I O I ° I ° I ° Z ~Z ~ Z I Z ~ 2~ Z ~Z ~ 2 a I a~ a I a I a I a ~D ~ D ~ I N I N I N I ~ I V) I N I N o ~o~ o ~ ~To~ o ~o~_o o c ~ ~w ~ ~ I c ~ ~ ~ ~ cn m I o I o I N I ° I o I ~ I m I I IC~o~o ~ Ll . °' ~ --ICAZ m r r*i -i I aA.-. I CAA C -i -ZI r A m z I ACAA I 't)CA'A I m o m Z --~ -I mzmz A --1 -1 .Z7 'AOA.-. I momma --I ,~ A. A o in nu r~f-~ I ~~ m C~~y m rmm ~-a m I m~N ImaVVI I N„3..,N r~i N I °AAAI r*i..m ~mQ~ ~ fnaVlo y IA.3-.A~ Zmrz*im I n m a~~ I nt~i m Z I o °DO~o ~~ °'v'w ~ m~m~ ~N J -_ L 1 ? _ 1 I I I~ I ~ I I~ I ~ I a I ~ I o ~ ~ ~ N I 0 ~ ~ ~ +-- -1 f --1 ~ ~ -~- ---1- ~ I 3 N ~ --} N -~ ~ ~ I ~ I ° I ° I ° I ° I ° I ° ~ I ~ ( ~~ ~ I ~ I ~ N N N H -_ I ~ V3 ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N I I I C7~ I CA '9 ~r I I I A A °'r mr N~ a I D I r ~a mr Z I Z~ nN mm I --1 N N ~~ j3 I w~ I ~~ I ~ ~~ ~m m ~ ~o I S A 3 ~o D A Z I ~> .T7 a I I m x i I x x x I ~ ~ I A n~ ~ ~ f I N m ~3 N 3~_~ I ~a m (") sm ~ ~ xg zN m0 zz ~ O` O O Z ~ C7 ~ Z "~ ~~~ 0 Z n ~~o c ~~~ -c 0 z ~ ~ C --~ M Z C7 v ~ _ ~ Z Z ~ ~ A D a' ~ Z ~ N~~~ 2\Z C -<~o ~ z <o ~ -o~ ,~ ~ m g~z v:U ~ o= ..~~ m. A D v O = 0 T 00 ~~ m ~ S ~ n am '{ ~ C ~ C ~O~ aom m ~ zm moo vim 0 A D m~~ v ~o~ ~ Z m ~ ~_ m~ mo o~ o~ mp :CJ ~ (T1 ~ (/) ~ D ~L7 fTl n Z .~ C7 .. _--< D cn Dm r ~ m (~ C -D -D ro rnm ~ ~ ~ rn z Z~DD O -< r- _I m N ~ ZO O CC.,JZ~ Z C -r~ -~ m C ~ -~i- Z 1 D ~ Z_7 Z D rn ... RESOLUTION of the 9~~~g ~Y AFFORDABLE HOUSING P.J~IARIIJFSS NINTH WHEREAS, decent, safe, and affordable housing is the cornerstone upon which our families ar~d our camminities are built; and WHEREAS, substandard or deteriorating housing, inadequate plumbing, and av~_.rc_rowding threa+._en the health ark. safety of Virginia's hr~.~seholdr and diminish the economic vitality of Virginia's communities; and WHEE2E'AS, those Virginians with special needs for acxessibility or supportive services have additional difficulty finding adequate affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the dream of decent affordable housing will only became a reality through the leadership and partnership of state and local goverrmients, businesses and civic organizations; Tf~2EFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the g~~~ ~Y recognizes the month of October, 1993, as AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARINFSS ~. ., ~~'~ ~ ~~.._.~_ ~ ~..-.~ 1, ~ ~-_.-~..~.-,tea--~-~- T l ~ W y U VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE P.O. Box 12164 Richmond, Virginia 23241 (804) 649-8471 /fax (804) 343-3758 September 30, 1993 Dear Local Official: VIRGINIA AS~ 1001 Eas Richmo~ (804) 788-~ ~~ ~cc _~,-,~r~ ~ ~~/s "~ ~_ J J= ~?~ . .,v,.,~ ~ ~..,.. ~.... _, ............-... October 27, 1993, has been designated as National Unfunded Mandates Day. It is the first day of a determined campaign to stop unfunded mandates. We plan to raise public awareness and understanding of the problem of~the federal and state government imposing but not funding programs or requirements that local governments are directed to carry out. We all agree that clean air, safe drinking water, fair wages, assisting the disabled and protecting endangered species are commendable national priorities. However, we believe that the federal government must be willing to pay to support these programs. National Unfunded Mandates Day (NUMDay) is a joint effort by local government officials and is being sponsored by the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the International City/County Management Association. At the state level, the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association are sponsoring the event. HERE'S WHAT YOU CAN DO: Adopt the attached resolution. Send VML or VACo a copy of your adopted resolution. Read through the attached draft press release and alter it to suit your local needs. Read through the attached letter to the editor and alter it to suit your local needs. Send it to the editor of your local newspaper. Fill out the attached survey form to let us know which mandates are the most unreasonable. We are planning our state's centerpiece event in Richmond on October 27, 1993, at 9:30 a.m. in front of City Hall at 9th and Broad Streets. All local officials are invited to join us that morning. If you would prefer to stage your own local event, we will be happy to NTIES coordinate with you. IF YOU WANT TO JOIN U5 IN RICHMOND, PLEASE CALL Suzette Denslow at the VML (804-649-8471), Leigh Ann McKelway at VACo (804-788-6652), or David Blount at the Virginia School Boards Association (804-295- 8722) to let us know. Also call if you have any questions or suggestions. Sincerely, R. Michael Amyx Virginia Municipal League ~~ James D. Campbell, CAE Virginia Association of Counties ~ e.~+ DRAFT RESOLUTION ON UNFUNDED MANDATES WHEREAS, according to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia's local ° governments are subject to 391 Federal and state mandates; and WHEREAS, unfunded mandates on local governments have increased significantly in recent years; and WHEREAS, federal and state mandates require cities, counties and towns to perform duties without consideration of local circumstances or capacity; and WHEREAS, in some cases mandates require local governments to redirect their priorities, to meet federal and state objectives rather than community objectives; and WHEREAS, excessive federal and state regulations on local governments impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes and fees, and/or reduced local services for residents; and WHEREAS, federal and state mandates too often are inflexible, one-size-fits-all requirements that impose unrealistic time frames and specify procedures or facilities where less costly alternatives might be just as effective; and WHEREAS, existing mandates impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these legislative and regulatory actions directly affect the citizens of our cities, counties and towns; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association are working with localities, school boards and organizations across the nation to begin a public education campaign to help citizens understand and then reduce the burden and inflexibility of unfunded mandates, beginning with a National Unfunded Mandates Day on October 27, 1993; ~p ~ ~ D "~' , .- NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the [City, County or Town of ..................] ~'~ endorses the efforts of the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and ~ the Virginia School Boards Association and their national counterparts, and supports working with the national groups to fully inform our citizens about the impact of federal and state mandates on our governments end the pocketbooks of our citizens; THAT the [City, County or Town of ....................] plans to redouble efforts to inform members of our Congressional and General Assembly delegations about the impact of federal and state mandates and plans to work with the delegations to reduce the burden of unfunded -nandates on our citizens. .-' ~ ° -~- 11I" v~ '~"`_ ~ ,that the [City, County or Town of .................J proclaims October 27, 1993, to be "Unfunded Mandates Day in [name of locality]," in observance of National Unfunded Mandates Day. I. (r SAMPLE PRESS RELEASE [City, County or Town of .................... Virginia] -- [The council of the [City or Town of .............] or the ...............County Board of Supervisors] has signed a resolution declaring October 27, 1993, as Unfunded Mandates Day in their community. The resolution calls for an end to unfunded mandates, which are laws and regulations passed by the federal and state governments that require local governments to meet their conditions, but do not provide funds for them to do so. "Unfunded mandates are a real problem for us in [locality's name]," said (local official's name and title]. "Increasingly, programs that we would like to develop for [locality's name] go by the wayside because of the flood of expenses required by new mandates from Washington or Richmond" Federal and state officials have issued such mandates with increasing frequency in recent years, because federal and state revenues have been decreasing. By ordering local governments to provide new services, the federal and state governments can require the services and shift the burden of new costs to the local government level. Ultimately, the cost is borne by the same group either way: taxpayers. Local government leaders have characterized such mandates as charging national and state bills to local government credit cards. To bring attention to the unfunded mandates problem in local governments, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the International City/County Management Association have joined forces to declare October 27, 1993, as National Unfunded Mandates Day. On that day, local governments throughout the nation will focus attention on the problem of unfunded mandates. In Virginia, this effort is supported by the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association, which have scheduled a news conference on October 27, at 9:30 a.m. in front of Richmond City Hall, located at 9th and Broad Streets. "It's time Virginia taxpayers woke up to the burden that unfunded mandates are placing on local finances," said [local official's name]. "This is one issue that we all agree on." For more information on this topic, call [local official's name) at [phone number]. For more information on the October 27 event in Richmond, contact Suzette Denslow at the Virginia Municipal League at (804) 649-8471, Leigh Ann McKelway at the Virginia Association of Counties at (804) 788-6652, or David Blount at the Virginia School Boards Association at (804) 295-8722. SAMPLE LETTER TO THE EDITOR - Deaz Editor: Have you every wondered why the cost of providing city, county, and town services keeps going up? At the same time do you hear from your local elected officials that they are doing what they can to contain these costs? And do you heaz them say that their hands are tied? Do you ever wonder what's going on? The main culprit is something called unfunded mandates, which begin at the federal and state levels of government. A mandate is a law, rule, regulation or requirement imposed on a "lower" level of government by a "higher" level of government. State and local governments have mandates imposed on them by the federal government. This is when the people in Washington, D.C., decide that they know what is best for your local community. Local governments also have mandates placed on them by the state government. This is when state officials, usually in Richmond, decide that they know what is best for your community. Local governments have no "lower" government to pass the mandates on to, so they are forced to pass the costs on to citizens through increases in the property tax or other taxes or fees or through decreased services. Unfunded mandates cut right to the core of what governing is all about: local autonomy and accountability. As one local official put it, "It's like someone taking your credit card at Christmas and buying you a lot of stuff you always wanted but could never afford. And they want, the credit for'giving' it to you." Let me say up front that local officials believe in doing the right thing. We recognize the need for policies that ensure basic and equal protection for all citizens, and we have always been willing to enter into partnerships with the state and federal governments to implement these policies. We all want clean air and water, well-trained police and fire personnel and excellent schools. When confronting problems, we need to ask: How do we deal with these problems? Who should pay the cost of coping with them? And how much is too much to pay? When federal and state officials pass the responsibility for raising taxes to pay for mandates on to, local officials, they do not have to think about cost or reasonableness. For example, it makes no sense for local governments in Virginia to be mandated by Washington to test water to determine if it contains harmful minerals found only in western states. But this really occurs -- and you are paying for it through higher local taxes and fees that your local officials don't control. The jCity, County, Town of ............. ]recently adopted a resolution calling for the state legislature and the U.S. Congress to stop the practice of passing laws and requirements on to local governments without providing the money to pay for the costs of compliance. We have also designated October 27, 1993, as U~lfunded Mandates Day in [locality name], in observance of National Unfunded Mandates Day. Thousands of cities, counties, and towns across Virginia and our nation are observing this day to call attention to this serious problem. Relief will occur only when the members of the General Assembly acid Congress hear from the public. I encourage all citizens to discuss t11is serious problem with their elected officials. Sincerely, " Speak out against unfunded mandates! Please list the mandates that are most burdensome to your locality. We'd like you to select 10, but if you want to choose fewer or choose more that will be OK. your name your title your locality 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 Please fax this form to Suzette Denslow at the Virginia Municipal League at (804) 343- 3758 or Leigh Ann McKelway at the Virginia Association of Counties at (804) 788-0083 by 5 p.m. on Oct. 6. 4AYSAr, MEMO TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: RAYSAC Members DATE: September 24, 1993 RE: Red Ribbon Week Thank you for agreeing to recognize Red Ribbon Week as part of the Board of Supervisors commitment to a drug free community. We appreciate your issuing the resolution at your October 12th meeting. Mrs. Katie Zawacki, Prevention Specialist for Blue Ridge Community Services, Prevention Plus+, will be there to accept this recognition on our behalf. P.o. Box 13543 The RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN was initiated in 1985 xoanoke, va. 24035 by the Virginia Federation of Communities for Drug- (703) 9s2-1427 Free Youth following the murder of Federal Agent Enrique Camarena by drug traffickers. The red ribbon was designated as the symbol of intolerance of illegal drug use and a commitment to a drug- f ree life style. This year the last week of October has been designated as th Executive Committee e annual National Red Ribbon Week. During this week Stuart Israel many communities across the United States conduct special Red Ribbon Chazr~nan ceremonies, rallies, contests, and other activities. Steven D. Goodwin vice Chairman RAYSAC is excited about promoting Red Ribbon Mary Gwen Marker Week, in the Roanoke Valley, October 23-31, as an excellent secretary/Treasurer way to demonstrate our commitment to a drug f ree eommuni ty . We have compi 1 ed some information and suggestions regarding vari ous ways of making the alcohol and other drug free theme visible in our schools, churches, businesses and community at large during this week. We see this as a great opportunity for you to help sponsor a special event, disseminate information , arrange for a speaker and/or make other plans which will highlight Red Ribbon Week. RAYSAC looks forward to continuing to work together to promote the Roanoke Valley as a drug free community. Roanoke Area Youth Substance Abuse Coalition by staff members concerning contract negotiations: (a) Sigmon, Boone & Beasley cases; and (b) Litigation with Grumman Emergency Products; and Section 2.1-344 A (1) Discussion of a personnel matter; evaluation of the County Administrator. BI;T MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:25 P.M. URC Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-91493-10 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AND RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:09 P.M. URC EVENING SESSION (7.00 P.M.) RECONVENE AT 7:10 P.M. R PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting the Zoning Classification of Roanoke County Tax Parcel Numbers 96.02-1-44 and 96.02-O1-45 from AG-1 to R-1 and the Amend the Zoning Classification of Certain Other Properties in Proximity to the Blue Ridge Parkway from AG-1 to AR. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-91493-11 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD - NO VOTE ALLOW FOR CONTINUED NEGOTIATIONS AYES-BLT,EGI~,HCN 9 1~1~ ~~ ~~~ AYES-BLT F-f'K,LBE,FM ABSENT-HCN 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Erect a 152 foot Self-supporting Broadcasting Tower, located on Honeysuckle Road, 1.75 Miles from Intersection of Honeysuckle Road and Poor Mountain Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Appalachian Power Company. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-92893-17 TO "UPON ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE". URC (HCN A,ItRIVED AT 7:20 P.M.) 3. Ordinance to Amend the Official Zoning Maps by the Adoption of Revised Flood Insurance Rate Maps Prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be Effective October 15, 1993, and to Make Minor Amendments to Section 30-74, Floodplain Overlay District, of the Zoning Ordinance to Reflect the New Maps, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-92893-18 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Dawn Hale, 418 Chestnut Drive, Vinton, Va. and Judith Pyska to speak regarding legislation for spading and neuterinf cats and dogs and pet overpopulation. ii H. FIRST READING OF Q~ZDINANC,~S 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Corneyance of a Temporary Grading and Construction Easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Association with the Construction of the New Forensic Lab and to Accept a Water and Sewer Easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/12/93 URC I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Corneyance of an .Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Five Oaks Road. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 0-92893-8 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance Amending Article IV, Sewer Use Standards of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985. (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) 0-92893-9 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 5