The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2/22/1994 - Regular~F gOANp~,~ ~ ~ ti A Z ~ o a X838 C~~ixxt#~ of ~.~~x~.a~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ~ffr~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M 2. Irnocation: Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i ® Recycled Paper LBE ADDED 3 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS BT{T ADVISED ACTION IS ANTICIPATED FOLLOWING EXEC. SESSION C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation on the New Century Council and Vision 2000 Process. (Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Director and Tom Robertson,Co-chair) PRESENTED BY BEV FITZPATRICK AND TOM ROBERTSON 2. Presentation on the 1991 Water Project (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) PRESENTED BY CLIFF CRAIG, JOHN BRADSHAW, HSMM, AND TED PETOSKI, PROTECT MGR E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report and Recommendation on Storm Related Damage to County Facilities. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT AND REQUEST FOR FUNDING ON 3/8/94. REQUEST TO INCLUDE ROOF REPAIRS TO SCHOOLS 2. Request from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for Approval of the 1994-95 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) R-22294-1 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC s 3. Request for Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Hollins/North County Library Expansion and Renovation. (Spencer Watts, Library Director) A-22294-2 BI;T MOTION TO AWARD CONTRACT TO LUCAS CONSTRUCTION FOR $931,875 URC 4. Request to Transfer Funds for Southwest County Park Projects. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks and Recreation) A-22294-3 LBE MOTION TO TRANSFER $236,000 WITHIN THE WINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT. COUN'T'Y ATTORNEY TO BRING BACK RENEGOTIATED CONTRACT WrTH VALLEY SOCCER CLUB FOR USE OF MEP:RIMAN FIELDS. URC F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC T~ARINGS N[)NT. H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Convenience Store, Located at the Corner of Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District Upon the Petition of Workman Oil Company. 2. Ordinance to Rezone 3.6 Acres from R-1 to I-1 in Order to Correct a Zoning Map Error and Bring an Existing Use into Zoning Conformity, Located at 8223 Reservoir Road in the Hollins Magisterial District (Tax Map Numbers 27.08-3-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -6) Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 3/22/94 ~~r I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Temporary Relocation of the Polling Place for the Hollins Voting Precinct from the Hollins Library to the North Roanoke Baptist Church. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PUBLIC HEARING - 3/8/94 Tyr J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Corneyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Starkey Park. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) 0-22294-4 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. URC K. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council LBE NOMINATED FRANCES R HOLSINGER TO ANOTHER ONE YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE MARCH 31, 1995. 2. League of Older Americans Board of Directors LBE NOMINATED MURRY K. WHITE TO ANOTHER ONE YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE MARCH 31, 1995, CONTINGENT UPON MR. WHITE'S WILLINGNESS TO SERVE. 4 MHA TO CONTACT LOA. L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII~L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-22494-5 BL,T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH ITEM L-7 REMOVED URC 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. A-22294-5.a 2. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of Setter Road and 0.06 Miles of Golden Court into the VDOT Secondary System. A-22294-5.b 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Village Lane Estates. A-22294-5.c 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hampden Hills, Section 4. A-22294-S.d 5. Request from the School Board for Appropriation of a $10,589 V-Quest Grant to the School Grant Fund. A-22294-5.e 5 6. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1994 for the Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1022. A-22294-5.f 7. Request for Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Blue Ridge Council of the Blind, Inc. ROBERT NOEL ADVISED THAT BLUE RIDGE COUNCIL WILL NOT OPERATE BINGO IN THE CITY IF APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. BI{T MOTION TO CONTINUE UNTIL ISSUES ARE RESOLVED REGARDING DENIAL - UW M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Nickens: (1) Announced Social Services had hired a Fraud Investigator. Asked AMG to handle publicity regarding the position. ~2) Received letter from Rebecca Farmer regarding a potential children's festival. Asked for Board consensus to have Pete Haislip review. (3) Asked about clans the Soccer fields at Vinyard Park. TC advised that RV Soccer Association has begun development and working with the City on concept plan. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Announced that Clean Valley Day will be held on April 16 and volunteers are need to participate in the cleanup. Supervisor Eddy: (1) Announced that he, PMM and ECH met with Roanoke Valley legislators in Richmond and attended VACO/VML Day activities. (2) Announced that Roanoke Valley officials had signed a joint statement of support for I-73 route through the Roanoke Valley, and officials will be meeting with federal congressional delegation on Thursday 2/24/94 in Washington. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COl~'IlVIU1vICATIONS NONE O. REPORTS 6 O~ ~AN~~F a z~ ~~ 2 a~ 1838 C~~~xx~#~ ~# ~u~txt~C~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1994 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth 1~iesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i ® Recycled Paper D. E. F. G. H. PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation on the New Century Council and Vision 2000 Process. (Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Director and Tom Robertson,Co-chair) 2. Presentation on the 1991 Water Project (Clifford Craig, Utility Director) NEW BUSINESS 1. Report and Recommendation on Storm Related Damage to County Facilities. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 2. Request from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for Approval of the 1994-95 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 3. Request for Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Hollins/North County Library Expansion and Renovation. (Spencer Watts, Library Director) 4. Request to Transfer Funds for Southwest County Park Projects. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks and Recreation) REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Convenience Store, Located at the Corner of Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District Upon the Petition of Workman Oil Company. 2 2. Ordinance to Rezone 3.6 Acres from R-1 to I-1 in Order to Correct a Zoning Map Error and Bring an Existing Use into Zoning Conformity, Located at 8223 Reservoir Road in the Hollins Magisterial District (Tax Map Numbers 27.08-3-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -6) Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. I. J. K. L. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Temporary Relocation of the Polling Place for the Hollins Voting Precinct from the Hollins Library to the North Roanoke Baptist Church. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Starkey Park. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. League of Older Americans Board of Directors CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the 3 Grievance Panel and the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. 2. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of Setter Road and 0.06 Miles of Golden Court into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Village Lane Estates. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hampden Hills, Section 4. 5. Request from the School Board for Appropriation of a $10,589 V-Quest Grant to the School Grant Fund. 6. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1994 for the Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1022. 7. Request for Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Blue Ridge Council of the Blind, Inc. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COlNIlVIUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of January 31, 1994 5. Accounts Paid -January 1994 4 6. Bond Project Status Report 7. Report on the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities 8. 1993 Economic Development Activity Report 9. Status Report on Recycling 10. Summary of 1993 Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Reaction/Response Times P. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS AND RECEPTION (4:15 P.M.) Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To discuss the disposition of publicly held property. R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to Elicit Citizen Comment on the Following: a. To Set a Real Estate Tax Rate of Not More than $1.13 per $100 Assessed valuation. b. To Set a Personal Property Tax Rate of Not More than $3.50 per $100 Assessed Valuation. c. To Set a Machinery and Tools Tax of Not More than $3.00 per $100 Assessed Valuation. 5 T. U. V. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.5 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2, Located in the 6300 Block on the South Side of Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. An Ordinance to Rezone 2.43 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2, to Allow Retail Uses, Located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of A & M Enterprises LLC. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit for an Accessory Apartment, Located at 4925 Bawer Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Charles Cooper. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) CITIZEN COD~IlI~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOiTRNMENT 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation on the New Century Council and the Vision 2000 Process COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the planning retreat on January 7, 1994, several Board members expressed interest in learning more about the New Century Council and the Vision 2000 process, and requested that a presentation be scheduled to describe the project to the Board. This time has been set aside for Beverly Fitzpatrick, Director of the New Century Council, and Tom Robertson, Co-chair, to describe the Council and what they hope to accomplish. mer C. Hodg County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~ -/ A Presentation On THE NEW CENTURY COUNC/L For the ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS February 22, 1994 NEW CENTURY VISION In 2015 the New Century Region is: • a world leader in public and private education • among the most desirable places in the world to live and work • renowned as the safest and healthiest place to live and work • a region in which the infrastructure system links the Region and the world • a diverse and globally competitive economy • a partnership o~` governments investing in tomorrow • a model for America in leadership, regional identity and creation of 21st Century opportunities The NEW CENTURY VISION establishes a clear picture of the future shared by the New Century Council and will become reality as the vision is adopted and implemented throughout the Region. The reality will be accomplished with a continuous and concerted effort by citizens, business and government to produce a better place to live and work for our children and grandchildren. Critical to the NEW CENTURY VISION is higher education, which had an economic impact of more than $1 billion in 1993 throughout the region. Higher education and globally competitive research will be the driving force for the New Century Regional economy as we enter the next century. 1 EDUCATION VISION The New Century Region is a world leader in public and private education. STRATEGIES: Life-Long Learning Create alife-long learning system in the New Century Region that is market and needs driven with an emphasis on flexibility, adaptability, accessibility and retraining in a safe environment. Expect students who demonstrate competence in required fundamental knowledge and skill at age 16 to make a commitment to one of three advanced areas: college prep, tech-prep, or apprenticeship. Develop these programs to be com.~etitive with other industrial nations. Assist young people in understanding the work place and determine their opportunities in the job market. Instill a sense of curiosity, enjoyment and love of learning that prepares people for a literate and fulfilling life in the New Century Region. Provide affordable access to higher education for all qualified students. Utilize the New Century Region's public facilities for a wide range of community activities and educational opportunities beyond traditional school hours. Educational Supcort Network Expect and encourage families and community organizations to instill discipline, teamwork, responsible citizenship, leadership and entrepreneurship in the region's young people. Create an atmosphere that involves families in the education of their children and in educational support groups. Emphasize early childhood education. Identify and support at-risk students early. Create strong alternative programs for drop-outs. 3 DUALITY OF LIFE VISION The New Century Region is among the most desirable places in the world to live and work. STRATEGIES: Recreation Arts, and Culture Nurture diverse high quality arts, cultural and recreational activities. Develop carefully planned access to the New Century Region's rivers with improved recreational opportunities, while protecting the sources of water supply as a competitive advantage for the Region. Develop comprehensive recreational programs for all ages. Move minor league sports up a class, support New Century Region's college and university teams, and push for major league sports activities. Develop the Explore Park and all regional and state designated cultural attractions. Preserve the Region's beauty, natural resources, and countryside. Community Encourage neighborhood development while instilling a sense of community and caring in the neighborhoods. Create a positive regional identity. Growth Create zoning ordinances that are logical, ensure enhancement of the quality of life, protect the environment and promote growth. Create sustainable development while planning and coordinating growth to enhance the Region's quality of life. Maintain the New Century Region's reputation as a low cost living area. 5 HEALTH AND SAFETY VISION The New Century Region is renowned as the safest and healthiest place to live and work. STRATEGIES: Safety Reform our law enforcement/criminal justice system to ensure it is effective and affordable. Develop, implement and promote effective programs against drunk driving, enhancing the Region's image as a model of transportation safety. Reduce substance abuse and related accidents to the lowest in the United States. Plan and coordinate disaster response in advance of need. Healthcare and Wellness Create a healthcare system that is based on wellness and prevention. Expect and encourage all citizens in the community to assume personal responsibility for high levels of wellness. Maintain high quality and readily available medical and emergency services. Improve health status for New Century Region citizens. Provide a nationally recognized training and continuing education center for health care. Encourage health providers and the business community to interact together to maximize the benefits of health-care reform. Expand and promote the public/private partnerships to ensure health-care access for all children from birth. Reduce the Region's teenage pregnancy rate by 50 per cent. 7 Expand the Region's traditional rail infrastructure. Create the means to ensure that governmental jurisdictions share resources and create regional financing mechanisms to provide anticipatory infrastructure to enhance the quality of life. Integrate a trail system with the regional transportation system. 9 Exaorts vs. Imports Maintain exports at a level greater than imports of goods and services between the New Century Region and the rest of Virginia, the United States and the world. Create in the New Century Region the proper mix of economic components to provide global competitive advantage and productivity. Develop aworld-class global studies program at Radford University. High per Capita Income Create jobs to ensure each member of the work force is employed at his/her optimal skill level in the New Century Region. Increase the New Century Region's per capita income above 105% of the U.S. average. Business Climate Strengthen the pro-business attitude throughout the New Century Region. Stimulate small business development in the Region. Make creative and innovative financing and capital available as programs for entrepreneurship and expansions develop throughout the New Century Region. Economic Development Develop the New Century Region as an economic entity through a balanced program of retention, expansion, relocation and creation of new business enterprise. Provide regional incentives for job creation within the New Century Region. Focus on economic development that exports goods and services outside the New Century Region. 11 LEADERSHIP VISION The New Century Region is a model for America in leadership, regional identity and creation of 21st Century opportunities. STRATEGIES: Advocacy Encourage our leaders to be the catalyst for linking the New Century Region and its resources to the state. nation, and world and making our shared vision a reality. Develop strong New Century Region advocacy with the local, state and federal governments. Promote a widely accepted name for the Region. Establish the New Century Region as the gateway to Western Virginia's future. Solicit private/public sector participation in governmental decision making. Expect local government to make timely decisions that benefit all citizens of the New Century Region. Development Create an atmosphere of partnership in which business and government understand and complement each other. Develop a New Century Region leadership institute. Develop New Century Region volunteer and leadership recognition awards. Create a program to develop youth leadership. Create an environment that encourages qualified people to run for public office. 13 POSSIBLE ACTION PLAN TASK FORCES 4 to 6 areas will be selected for Phase I Action Plan Development 1. Economy 2. Higher Education and Research Centers 3. Manufacturing 4.Technology 5. Distribution/Transportation 6. Tourism, Conventions, and Retirement 7. Small Business 8. Education 9. K-12 Education 10. Adult Education 11. Training and Re-training 12. Distance Learning 13. Qualm/ of Life 14. Arts, Cultural and Recreational Activities 15. Community 16. Growth 17. People 18. Housing 19. Health and Safety 20. Safety 21. Health Care and Wellness 22. Infrastructure 23. Infrastructure to Provide Competitive Advantage 24. Governance 25. Regional Government Co-operation 26. Regional Infrastructure Network 27. Regional Financing Mechanisms 28. Leadershia 29. New Century Region Advocacy 30. Leadership Development 31. Regional Communication 32. Continuity to Assure the Reality of Vison 15 The New Century Council Background Through the years, Western Virginia has proven to be one of the greatest places in the United States to live and work. We have always been proud of our geography, our work ethic and our quality of life. The area has always been steady, and for the most part, our economy has remained stable through the years. !n 1992 and 1993, we were suddenly awakened by major changes in our manufacturing and service industries. Downsizing, off--shore competition, corporate mergers and defense cutbacks all seemed to hit the New River and Roanoke Valleys at once, and our lives changed. It became apparent that people making decisions outside the area were determining our future. As a result of those changes, leaders of the New River and Roanoke Valleys met to discuss what we, as a region, could do to create a preferred future for the area and our citizens. A group called The New Century Council was formed to create a strategic plan for the future of the New River and Roanoke Valleys. The area, called the New Century Region, consists of the counties of Giles, Pulaski, Montgomery, Craig, Floyd, Franklin, Botetourt and Roanoke, along with the cities of Radford, Salem and Roanoke. The New Century Region is approximately 100 miles long and has over 400,000 residents. The New Century Council is governed by a Steering Committee with representatives from each Chamber of Commerce in the area, The New River Valley Alliance, the Economic Development Partnership of the Roanoke Valley, and the Roanoke Valley Business Council. The mission of The New Century Council is to assemble, by facilitation and public input, a plan for the future of the New Century Region that will be designed by and for the citizens of the area so that they determine our future rather than having it left to others outside the region. The goal is to have the plan effective and all its goals met by the year 2015. The most important challenge is to understand the region, its strengths, its weaknesses, and more importantly, what we must do to create jobs and opportunity for the citizens of the New Century Region. This requires a better understanding of the global marketplace in which we find ourselves and better ways to work together to reach the New Century Region's greatest potential. No longer will we let others determine our future; together, we will decide how to move forward into the 21st Century. The New Century Council will formulate the vision, put strategies and action plans on paper, and coordinate, with other organizations, the implementation of the plan by the year 2015. The New Century Council Mission To build a vision for the New River Valley and the Roanoke Valley which is comprehensive and detailed, shared, understood, and which reflects general commitment throughout the region. The New Century Council's primary goal is to facilitate a strategic plan for the New River Valley and the Roanoke Valley. An objective of this planning process is for these communities to jointly develop a vision for the long-term economic viability of the region without compromising the quality of life now enjoyed. A Summary of Actions and Goa/s Develop a new, coordinated 'wvorking team" from throughout the Roanoke Valley and New River regions with extensive participation from Chambers of Commerce, economic development professionals, the Roanoke Valley Business Council, neighborhoods and higher education in the area. 2. Determine aregion-wide "vision" of .where the area can and should be at the beginning of the next century. 3. Develop specific goals and plans for implementing the vision. Resource availability and transportation networks will be major factors for the goal-setting process. Effective liaison with governmental officials (local, state, regional, and national) will be an essential building block of this process. Other components of the vision will be quality of life issues such as education, leadership and inter-government cooperation. 4. Strengthen a "sense of identity ... and a sense of mission" for the area. 5. Impart an understanding of -and strategies for -demographic changes. 6. Involve all sectors of education in a partnership to address "preparedness" questions. 7. Develop year-long task forces on other quality-of--life issues, economic development, education, including health and public safety, leadership, inter-government cooperation and natural resources. 8. Review--national, state, local, and regional--innovations that may have applicability for preparing this area of Virginia for "the new century." The New Century Region ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: February Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir and the project is on schedule. last month included: ° Continued ° Completed ° Continued ° Completed ° Continued ° Continued is now in its twenty sixth month Construction activity during the on gate house, testing, ling at pump station, at pump station, at pump station, installation at intake. work pump pain roof HVAC gate The current project contract total costs including existing and pending change orders is $25,044,000. This cost remains unchanged from the previous report. Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $24,790,912_.27 and $1,658,732.48 for engineering construction phase services. During the next month, the contractor will perform the following: ° Substantially complete the project, ° Complete construction of the intake tower gates, ° Complete pump station, ° Complete paving weather permitting, ° Clean up site. WATER TREATMENT PLANT ..L-.~ The Water Treatment Plant continues in the design phase. Activity during the last month included: ° Started construction of Glenvar Pump Station, ° Continued construction of sewer and first mile of transmission line. During the next month, staff will perform the following: ° Complete work on equipment specifications and contract documents, ° Complete construction drawings, ° Clear site for access to complete specific soil borings, ° Bid contract for river to plant pipe work, ° Bid rough grading of treatment site. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work continues on the Water Transmission Line: ° Title certification, ° Easement negotiation, ° Obtaining easements, ° Preparation of construction drawings, ° Bid first section of transmission line - Starkey to Route 221. Work will continue on acquisition of easements during the next month. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffo aig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: . ~ ~ P~~/ Elmer C. H ge County Adminis ator VOTE No Yes Abs Minnix Johnson Kohinke Eddy Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Weather Related Costs. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The prevailing harsh weather in the area since December has caused some unusual costs to the County. These expenditures have resulted from damage to equipment and buildings, overtime pay, the use of sub-contract help and the purchase of emergency supplies and equipment. Our employees have done an excellent job in dealing with these occurrences and fortunately, costs have been less than expected. A report summarizing the types of damage experienced, including a compilation of costs, is being prepared and will be presented at the meeting on February 22, 1994. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~•/ Summary of Storm Related Costs to the County of Roanoke 12/93 through 2/22/94 Fire & Parks & General Police Rescue Recreat. Services Overtime Vehicle (repair/replace) Materials Tools/Equip. Contract Services Sick leave Facility Repair $ 2,367 $ 8,749 $ 5,527 $ 1,207 18,125* 4,152 420 530 4,435 1,392 1,268 160 685 650 2,700 14,646 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total $21,832 $12,901 $14,615 $17,665 Grand Total Reported...... $67,013 There are likely to be some minor additional costs. These will be accumulated and an agenda item prepared for action at the next Board meeting. Bulk and Brush Pickup As of now we have had no calls for special service on brush and bulk pickup. Our current plan is to pick up this material on the normal schedule. If it becomes necessary, we will work Saturdays and Sundays to whatever extent is required to meet the need. The figures in the table above do not reflect costs that will be incurred for additional debris removal resulting from the latest storm. * Includes the replacement of one police cruiser 4 r C~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, FEBRIIARY 22, 1994 RESOLIITION 22294-1 APPROVING THE ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BIIDGET FOR FY 1994-1995, IIPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONB WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 9, 1994, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1994-1995 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1994-1995 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 9, 1994, report of the Commission Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: y AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Airport Commission Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Kit B. Kiser, Vice Chairman W. Robert Herbert H. Odell Minnix 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2-1 1 48 (703) 362-1999 i FAX (703) 563-4838 L - ,~,, Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director February 9, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Dear Gentlemen: Raava~ A~on~ /`Y Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1994-95 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1994-95 proposed Operating and Capital Purchases Budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed S100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, V Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director J LS: CSp Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission c5p012894.h commU4butlget.ltr _ 28Jan-94 ATTACHMENTI PROPOSED Fl' 94-93 BUDGET 1993-94 Budgeted t 994-95 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Op erations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,409,901 $1,497,768 B. Operating Expenditures 1,147,230 1,118,060 C. City Services 621,000 609,000 D. Other Projects 38,000 78,000 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,216,131 3,302,828 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. Interest .594,218 583,766 B. Debt Service 288,976 288,976 Total Non-Operating 883,194 872,742 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Equipment 57,300 93,500 Total Capital Expenses 57,300 93,500 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,156,625 1993-94 Budget 1994-95 Projected REVENUE PROJECTIONS Revenues Revenues 1. Op erating Revenues A. Airfield $843,657 $962,642 B. General Aviation 112,625 108,713 C. Terminal Related 2,935,382 2,973,371 D. Other Revenues 169,426 180,330 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,061,090 4,225,055 2. Non-Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 27,500 26,000 B. Interest on Investments 175,000 180,000 C. Roanoke County Base Service Fee 264,640 264,640 Total Projected Non-Operating Revenues 467,140 470,640 ~`.2i Total Projected Revenue $4,528,230 ~ $4,695,695' ~ --` ,. '~ ATTACHMENT II PROPOSED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES cFor protects expected to exceed 5100,000 in cost and Intended to benefit five or more accounting periods.) A. PROJECTS: 1. Installation of Additional Elevator (n Terminal a. Description and Justification: The growing number of regional air carrier operations, the wide expanse of ramp used for loading and unloading passengers and the ADA have all combined to give rise to a need for an additional elevator in the terminal. This elevator would be built at the end of the concourse to meet the needs of a growing number of passengers. b. Rough Estimate of Cost: 5200,000.00 2. Purchase Snow Removal Equipment a. Description and Justification: Having finally experienced a more normal winter and while developing an FAA requested snow plan, it has been determined the airport could be opened more quickly and safely main- tained in a more efficient manner if the following pieces of equipment were purchased: i. Dumptruck with sand spreader and blade; ii. High speed snowbroom with blade; ill. Three replacement plow blades; iv. Chemical spreader truck. b. Estimated Cost: 5430,000.00 (S70,000 truck with sand spreader, S250,000 snowbroom, S10,000 blades, and S100,000 chemical dispenser truck.) s. FUNDING SOURCES: Federal Airport Improvement Program Grant Funds S567,000.00 Commonwealth Aviation Grant Funds 31,500.00 Commission Funds 31,500.00 City and County Funds 0.00 $630,000.00 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'~ "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1994-95. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -nti.~,.~.r ~~- BACKGROUND: The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is required to submit their budget to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke City Council for approval before it can be formally adopted by the Commission. At its meeting on February 9, 1994, the Commission approved the attached budget for fiscal year 1994-1995 to be forwarded to the governing bodies of the two localities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1994-95 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shows revenues of $4,695,695 and expenditures of $4,269,070. This reflects that airport operations are self supporting and do not require any additional supplement from either the County or the City. The Commission also adopted the attached proposed capital expenditure program. The Capital expenditures total $630,000. These expenditures will be funded as follows: Federal Grant $ 567,000 State Grant 31,500 Commission Funds 31,500 City and County Funds -0- 630 000 --- .~ r FISCAL IMPACT: The County will continue to make its annual payment of $264,640 which constitutes our original ten year contribution to the airport. To date, the County has contributed $1,801,285 and has $793,920 remaining in our obligation to the Airport Commission. There will not be any additional monies needed as a result of this budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for the fiscal year 1994-95. ~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance . 1. Elmer C. odge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke - - - Minnix - - - Nickens - - - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1994-1995, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 9, 1994, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1994-1995 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1994-1995 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 9, 1994, report of the Commission Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. A-22294-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Construction Contract for Hollins/North County Library Expansion and Renovation COUNTY A.pM~NIS~RRATOR'S COMMENTS' `~~ EXECUTIVE StJ1~II~lARY: Lucas Construction provided the low bid for construction work for the Hollins/North County Library expansion and renovation project. The costs contained in this bid were within the limits of the project budget for construction. Following the appropriate review process, a contract at a sum of $931,875 was drafted. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Sealed bids for the Hollins/North County Library project were opened on January 18, 1994. Lucas Construction submitted the low bid, which was reviewed by the project architect and the Procurement Department for technical compliance. The project architect also reviewed the proposed subcontractors and examples of past projects completed by the contractor. The review process indicated that the contract should be awarded to Lucas Construction. A standard contract was drafted and given to the County Attorney for his review. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of $931,875, outlined within this contract are within the amounts budgeted for construction and renovation. Construction costs include the base bid and addenda number one and two. Adoption of the contract should allow the County to build, renovate, and completely finish all planned areas for the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to execute the construction contract for the Hollins/North County Library project which is approved as to form. Respectfully submitted, Approv d b • ~~ ~ Spe cer Watts Elmer C. Hod Library Director County Administrator ~3 Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to award contract to Lucas onstruction for $831_,875 VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Spencer Watts, Director Library Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement A-22294-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ """ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Transfer Funds for Southwest County Park Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The 1992 Bond Referendum allocated $236,000 to the Windsor Hills District to light two ballfields at Garst Mill Park and to purchase park land to develop two new fields. In August of 1993, a group of residents representing the Youth sports groups in Windsor Hills and Southwest County submitted a proposal advocating the reallocation of Windsor Hills bond funds to complete the construction of the Merriman Soccer Complex (the Merriman Soccer complex is currently leased to The Valley Soccer Club, Inc., as a public private partnership for the development of soccer facilities in Southwest County) and to make additional improvements to Starkey Park. This group indicated the Garst Mill fields should not be lit because they were only used for minor league and T-ball play. The basis for considering lighting of the two fields at Garst Mill in the Bond Referendum was the fact that these were the only unlit fields in the Windsor Hills area. Based on the leagues actual use and potential zoning and erosion problems, it appears impractical to light these baseball fields. In addition, they questioned the availability of affordable park land in Windsor Hills. A subsequent report prepared by John Willey, Roanoke County Property Manager, documents the lack of appropriate and affordable park land in the Windsor Hills district. In light of this information, the Windsor Hills Youth Sports representatives feel the proposed reallocation of Bond funds is in the best interest of Windsor Hills youth. During this process suggestions were made concerning the need to make some improvements at Garst Mill Park. It was decided to develop a master plan of Garst Mill and include any recommendations for improvements in the final staff report. After several meetings involving Supervisors Eddy and Minnix, County staff, Recreation Commission members, and the Southwest County Youth Recreation Association, staff was directed to do an 1 analysis of current and future athletic field needs for Southwest County and to make recommendations on how the bond funds could best be reallocated to meet the overall recreation needs. SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: After establishing Standards of Play for youth baseball and soccer, and extensive analysis of youth athletic needs in Southwest County, Parks and Recreation staff feel it is in the best interest of youth athletics and County citizens to reallocate Windsor Hills Bond funds to several projects. Staff has provided three options listed below. It is important to note that the current lease of the Merriman Road property between Roanoke County and The Valley Soccer Club, Inc. provides exclusive use and control of the facility to The Valley Soccer Club, Inc. Any resolution that includes County funds going to complete this project should require a renegotiation of the existing lease to give the County more control of its use. Oriainal Windsor Hills Bond Proiects Lights 2 Garst Mill fields $112,000 Purchase Land 50,000 Build Two Fields 62,000 TOTAL: $236,000 Option #1 Merriman Soccer Complex Develop 4 soccer fields & parking $ 52,000 Light two soccer fields $ 92,500 Support amenities (bleachers/goals) $ 12,000 Total $156,500 Starkey Park Develop additional parking lot $ 15,000 Additional bleachers S 6,000 Total $ 21,000 Garst Mill Improvements Improve/expand parking Replace/upgrade playground New picnic shelter Total Total Project Cost Project Contingency TOTAL OPTION #2 Merriman Soccer Complex Develop 4 soccer fields & parking Light two soccer fields Total $ 17,000 $ 12,500 $ 13,000 $ 42,500 $220,000 16,000 236 000 $ 52,000 $ 92,500 $144,500 2 Starkey Park Develop additional parking $ 11,000 Total $ 11,000 Garst Mill Imurovements Improve parking $ 17,000 Replace/upgrade playground $ 18,500 Total $ 35,500 Develop 2 new 150' T-ball fields or light one 200" field in SW Co. $ 45,000 TOTAL 236 000 OPTION #3• No action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriation required for this proposal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Parks and Recreation staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission recommend the reallocation of the 1992 Bond monies as outlined in Option #2. It is further recommended that the lease with The Valley Soccer Club, Inc. be renegotiated. Res ectfully submitted, Appro ed y, Pete Ha slip D rector Elmer C. Ho ge Parks & Recr on Department County Administ ator -------- ------------------------------- AGTICI~T -------- -------- ------------ ~7IE Approved (x) Mot ion by: T,PP B_ Rdc3~ mo .ion to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) transfer $236,000 within the Eddy ~ Received ( ) Windsor Hills District. County Johnson _ ~ Referred ( ) Attorney to bring back re- Kohinke x To ( ) negotiated contract with Valley Minnix _ x Soccer Club for use of Nickens _ x Merriman Fields _ cc: File Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Department Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 3 ATTACHVII~TI' #A SOIITHWEST COUNTY YOIITH SPORTS TEAM GROWTH REPORT CAVE SPRING NATIONAL BOYS BASEBALL AGE GROUPS 1991 1992 1993 6-8 YEARS(T-BALL) 13 14 12 9-12 YEARS(MINOR) 9 10 9 11-12 YEARS(MAJOR) 7 8 8 13-15 YEARS(SR MINOR) 7 3 5 15-17 YEARS(SENIOR) 0 4 3 GLENVAR INTERLOCKING - - 3 TOTALS 36 39 40 CAVE SPRING AMERICAN BOYS BASEBALL AGE GROIIPS 1991 1992 1993 6-8 YEARS(T-BALL) 20* 20* 18 9-12 YEARS(MINOR) 8 14 13 11-12 YEARS(MAJOR) 8 8 9 13-15 YEARS(SR MINOR) 6 4 4 15-17 YEARS(SENIOR) 1 3 3 SEMI-TOTALS 43 49 47 GIRLS SOFTBALL AGE GROUPS 1991 1992 1993 6-8 YEARS(MINI MITE) * * 10 9-10 YEARS(MINOR) 7 3 10 10-12 YEARS(MAJOR) 4 3 5 13-15 YEARS(SR MINOR) 4 3 4 15-17 YEARS(SR/DEBS) 2 3 5 SEMI-TOTALS 17 12 34 TOTALS IN C.S. AREA 96 100 121 SW CO. SOCCER ASSOC. 67 66 75 TOTAL NIIMBER OF YOIITH SPORTS TEAMS = 196 *IN 1993 THE GIRLS 6-8 YEARS SEPARATED FROM THE BOYS T-BALL PROGRAM AND BECAME THE MINI MITES. 4 ATTACHMENT #B YODTH SPORTS PROGRAN STA~iDARDB (THESE STANDARDS WERE DEVELOPED FOR PLANNING PORPOSES ONLY) STANDARDS FOR YOIITH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL During the practice season, each team in the Little League T-ball & Minors and Dixie League Mini-Mites & Angels shall have two 1.5 hour practices per week for a total of 3 hours weekly. Children 10 and under shall not play or practice past 8:30 p.m. on a school night. During the practice season, each team in the Little League Majors, Belles, Debs, and Pony-tails shall have two 2 hour practices per week for a total of four hours weekly. During the practice season, each team in the Little League Seniors shall have two 2 hour practices per week for a total of four hours weekly. Each league shall have an 18 game season. During the game season, each team shall have two 2-hour games per week and one 1.5-hour practice per week. STANDARDS FOR YOIITH SOCCER During the practice season, 6 year old co-ed instructional leagues will have two 1-hour practices per week. During the practice season, 7 & 8 year old boys and girls instructional leagues will have two 1.5-hour practices per week. During the practice season, 9 year old and up boys and girls, division 1- 4 leagues, will have two 1.5-hour practices per week. During game season, 6 year old co-ed instructional leagues will have one 1-hour practice & one 1-hour game per week. During game season, 7 & 8 yr old boys and girls instructional leagues will have one 1.5-hour practice per week & one or two 1-hour games per week, not to exceed six 1 hour games per month. During game season, 9 year old and up boys and girls, division 1-4 leagues, will have one 1.5-hour practice & one or two 1-hour games per week, not to exceed six 1 hour games per month. A 12 game season will be established for the soccer program. c~pete~boardrpt.gm 5 .ATTACHMENT #C N O 'lit O W y O "~ ^1.r O O t ~ `~ v `,C, ~ 4+t ~ ~w 'Iw A ~ C~ MN V' l r rrO 1 ~tO_O r l ~-~C'') ;{ .. gin.:. . ::;~ ~Gptt ~~V'r ~('~~ N~~t ~:.: r r . ~, ";' 000 ~~n N r OtnO 1 O ~ :::'s ~~• ~C ~ # J ~ :: m 000 ~~r IJ O~~ I O~~ "~ . ~ :.. ~ N ~ ' . CD as ~~ 000 c~`ac`~ °~~ ~~~ ~~ - ~ '~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ m ~~ ~ ~~~ r r r C N ":'':' N ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ U U U ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ m ~m _~ _ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~~c~ ~~U~3 c c C ~~O ~~ Y ''~ W ~ _ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ Q ~ a W m cn m ~ ~ a N d N o N m rn ~ C ~ O_ Z CC J Q at ~_ ip ~ ~ w ii u.i.~ a ~~a ~ ~~ I ~~ r ~~ V ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c0 c0 c0 H N ~ ~ 2 ~ °1 ~ ~ ~ S ~ °~ ~ ~ W S ~ 2 , ~ mmm ~~~ ~ mm~ N ~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~ d)(~ ~ ~_ i€si J ~~~ J ~~~ Q Z °~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~i_~ a ~~~ w ~~ w ~~ ~~ N .~:~.sz N ddd ~$ V ~$ v a r ~ a ~~~ m a a ~~~ m ~ ~~ ~ o ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ o °'8-.. ~ ~ ~ a i ~~ ~~. c c ~ ~ 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~' ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for March 22, 1994. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store, located at the corner of Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Workman Oil Company. (2) An ordinance to rezone 3.6 acres from R-1 to I-1 in order to correct a zoning map error and bring an existing use into zoning conformity, located at 8223 Reservoir Road in the Hollins Magisterial District (tax map numbers 27.08-3-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 and -6), upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR'8 OFFICE. ~i-- .2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for March 22, 1994. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 2, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens u a°~`\aR OR ' .. s ~~i•'\r~~'^k'A~ `-~= ~w\~ ~~~.1 ~~ c„~ LCI o C!T OS RJR ~ g DR. C~ u J ~.\~ P S lE ? p ? ? //.'ORMAN.~/ 4/ ~I~ T~ NOR~¢ Q' ~qti ~"• ~ .419 I ;~ SH`'?~ KNO: ~ k~ ~~ 0V}f, a~-E ~2 R~ Ro~K v~ ~~ a• GiFS,fge~ < 3 R O~ ORIUrAq°Ert~ .o rsT$ S-~ ~+ NF n«.,~ y !L\~^~o• ,'-ti` 4q . $ auuu ~RD` 0 t.+r ~ 9a cewrrw~ orr~ y z S yi w~ec MT. RIEkAMr'~ ~ _ RtG~ ~~.x..x~ \7 WES'isc'mes\oy°~ j' ~\`o o - .c~° __ .~. /~~~ ~'~ b ~ , ~F ryas 9o S e ~4o R P7 662 ' ; - ' f~ R ~C~ 1~ C ,~C 'iL~ROCK fMSM~o fCfi?~~LAgnrC 11~ F ~~" eA Y+ e.~E`. S~%'.` IRq !-cL3" !.R ~yyTH1A ~ ~ ~ rt` SMO1R p0 q~\ ~~~~ l `• "Yy.l~ /~ `-~QZ)'i TTNu o CwvE Sv~~ {AVE SPRANG lA.~~ R o~ `TT`'~~ • y T . f'ti ~' p>~ LUWANA dt ~•. ~~. OO •~ CA ;,- A, A ~ ~ ~ ~\ +~c~ c ~--' ` Asa, r ~ ~ any JG,,:~~,o~.:\ _ '°~ -----~---4+a//\k-#Ol s.•~ ETLIIV HILL . wo~tTN~ ati9 cROss : %~ •='~ A~u~. H; VICINITY MAP ~ ~ ~"~~~ ~, _ SrwnOL Rp~" + DEPARTI~NT OF PLANNING ~ET/7'/OSIER.' IrYDRKM~~ Ott coMpstNy :. '~ 1 AND ZONING ~EaUE~3T: SPFC/AL SSE P~RMlT' °~~ ~._ • C'dnlVEn/t ~IVCE STD~C'E H- / NORTN ,1~; ~~ ; rP'" /• far[,; ~ ( \ I ~ ~~ 1~ ' I / o :;a ~\`~.~r8, ,1, oc ~: AEI 'Os P ~/i~~l~~C~~~~.' `Cp_F~ - ~">P+Ya._~~y. V ~ ~yy5)~' _ _ / ~"I \ _ ... ,_ •~:~1.~ r~ `y ~ Io-`B~`tY~ f `~+3~' t Imo/, r. / ~ ~ :~r ~:t.~ Tc f 4S? Y c~ ~ \) ~ ESE ~ ~ ;< ~'C `\`\`.~ .~~k~\E`17 ~u,;~ :'\v/.rr.~w~,y'd~~s ~ .,1::.-:4 .. ~p,~~ ~y~, ~~~~+;,''-.~`~''y''~' V I C I N I T Y MAP - ~4'-~-~ ~ ~~' 9'~`,~ ~~~ /-~ - ,z Q NORTH .._ ~" * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG PETITIONER: Rke County ,Planning Commission a~ _~ ~ AND ZONING REQUEST: Rezone from R-1 to I-1 ~' TAX MAP #27.08-3-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 r.,~ 1 ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. '~ T '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE HOLLINS VOTING PRECINCT FROM THE HOLLINS LIBRARY TO THE NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH PURSUANT TO § 24.2-306, 24.2-307, and 24.2-310 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Electoral Board is recommending to the Board of Supervisors that the voting place for the Hollins Precinct temporarily be moved from the Hollins Library to the North Roanoke Baptist Church. A meeting of the Electoral Board is scheduled for Tuesday, February 22 at 10:00 a.m. to officially adopt this recommendation. This move was requested because construction at the Hollins Library makes it unavailable for the June 14 Democratic Primary. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: §§ 24.2-306, 24.2-307, and 24.2-310 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorize the relocation and establishment of polling places for the various election precincts within the County. The first reading of this ordinance will be held February 22, 1994; the second reading and public hearing will be held March 8, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the attached ordinance authorizing the temporary relocation of the polling place for the Hollins Voting Precinct. Respectfully submitted, --~~.~. n~ . rvl Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 1 '_-- / Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 ~-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE HOLLINS VOTING PRECINCT FROM THE HOLLINS LIBRARY TO THE NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH PURSUANT TO § 24.2-306, 24.2-307, and 24.2-310 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Electoral Board of Roanoke County has recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County the temporary relocation of the polling place for the Hollins Voting Precinct from the Hollins Library to the North Roanoke Baptist Church for the June 14 Democratic Primary election held within Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on February 22, 1994; and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 8, 1994. 2. That the temporary relocation of the polling place for the Hollins Voting Precinct from the Hollins Library to the North Roanoke Baptist Church for the June 14 Democratic Primary election held within Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp5]\agenda\general\relocate.hol 3 am~~,a -.~'- / PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on March 8, 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE HOLLINS VOTING PRECINCT FROM THE HOLLINS LIBRARY TO THE NORTH ROANOKE BAPTIST CHURCH PURSUANT TO § 24.2-306, 24.2-307, and 24.2-310 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: February 22, 1994 March 1, 1994 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MS. MARY ALLEN ' a r~6~ a-1~-~~-.~ .. ~ ~-___ ~3 : s~ pM O~ ,~~a-aoo~ .. - - .z~ ~ . y, { ~f, 6624 Peters 'Creek Road - = - .- a ers ree oad . __._ _ _ _. l /~ , , ,. f r • _ _ _ -•- ~. ~ .-_ ~ " ~ l ~'' p M~~euE hoME' ' ~ HOIUN ~~ "~ i '1 /'i"~ O ARK , ., ..+' ~J ~ ~ i~ • ~~..` RF1gU, -1~i0 F~ - ;:- .., t , ~, O .~ ,~ ~~ ... , --. -~~- ...R ~,~ ~ ~( ~i .. °-~~ .. ~-... P(~ y r !rw ` Sd $ 1895 Va \ . ~ aP ~ ~f ~~ ~!. /~ ~ i ~"~~~ ~o~q •- ~c`~qp~ ..~o ~~{~II~3 .~ atE"°SHt `` , ~ ~a~o°"~,~ .` ,~:"; , - -~~! ~1 ~/ 4 / v ~ ~ r ~ y.Ji~ ~QS Pa . . P~' ~ ~ \ TNCATRI .~' if ~ _._.._ _. Y_ . O.. p a j %... ~/1 ~ ~ i ~ to +a'fgB'~o R N OR~H URLIN N ~~SW~~DR'T. ~~ / j ~~~ ./ ~ f~~ ~%~ /, Pe>,raq~' ~y- •~ HEIG TS.QOp~ ~ ~,~~~,tt. ~ ~/ r, , ~ ~• . ~~ c / i/~~ / ~ • ~ 'PO '~~'(p ~ OQ' ~ ~ 1 ir' (- , ~,. d9 ~~~~ ~` . ~'~ ~~`'~~ ( ~ ~`~ ,,, t ~ ~ 1, rr ~. _ ~ 713 ~` ~ ~ ~%.; 9y i ~~ ~O'Q3~a ~ ~ ~p~N~V~-'~P~ ~Wl~i'~~tOM , -. ~r-~~`~.~ 1 rF 071` ~b~~.".."'Ei4~~gK }_ ~ 605 I ~J 7' ` ' ~~ Ot~pO~tN b ..•~'. aS ~ ~20 ~~ 11`~ y ~r[i~`?C'JL+~wNt~O f •~St ~ , : ,E, ~ ,, 115 ,. ~ 6L"D ~,.'~ ~ .• : ~ p 1 ~" 49~ Rcu ~,~ a 4'L vtt~ 1 F S a O 1 h- d 1 pry 9 i \ ~ ~, a'AO o~ 'y ~~ ~ /, .. , M 8,~ + ~ ~ y~"~y~ HOW NS i ~ 1 cl~ ~ 0 ,' r~o~ .• ;i +,.Rp M^'~`~o qo by Q• pAP} `~~ 04 ~~W ,~~ •'~",>; ~.A'~r~~`1>6AMa R ,'4a^ '~rtt0 ~it9V~~/.'~: _ ~ 6~1 _ R ~~ PfT ~ ~p~ 1 832 tP~°~'f,.~(@_„ ~o~NROLI~~ paf. L ~ ~wl~sp .- r`\;1D ~$ ~ai~ is ~oy.8i5UYNEp~ v ~~p~®HAvEN ~~ r ~~} •tr.e" ` Oy~p~vnrvlCw °* o.f~tvgR p- ~q 'tb R pEYTOr15 A 5r~~ ~~yy~~~~p~ `o>;` ~ OuID.~f~(~' ~~~ ~~ µ _ of ~~OJ P ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~M~L' t0 ~ .: ~ E T~ St MES' PvN. rf 1'^ ~ , ~~ A ~'~C`"~~Ey 4iR OAKS RD ~ DR J ( `~ 6U5 a I II ~ O ~ .., ~, , ` Alo 1A k0 - ~ '~ ~ ...- -- oaBRYAN R u, ,.. `O IEW ~.. Q'" .. ` ~ ~ G s g j,RDMORE~J~ DR oo ~ r ~ ~R P i'~ .FAN Ni~',ST sa\.. RDOKV,t' o ~ HEi iS ~ ' GAR "`7~+~'C_~ AVN SMiRt/ !.. Of' JG•y y~ % ~'tV/- AJ / ~~ ~ ~~~. .. Q~ .o~.3JS ~M'.,. ~+` N NORiN ~ ~ns,-•"• : :c.••. .-%••- NOR7~ NuGH 1 ~i MAC p~ ..-- - -- e2 °~~ti • tss oa ~~ ?'`'N ; :, PaJ~yr'` ~ ~ ~' ~+ S~JMMERDEAN ~'~°~ ,t~~` ,w •••~; = °.q~o ( "*o 5` p c ~j, l ~WGHfl'r ....~o1LLAR0 [~il Cg 4P~ P ~ 7• I ,STS ~tu~ !'SIiN/ ~a ~ adi .,.•~-~ _ •,~ °A~,LI S -• , it0~~r ~ ~ G` ',i ~P EY.r' I St/ (•, i; 'u ~r ~ •~ s t1N(,t ~ A~ jO~SUN OOK i ~vQ~ l/ ti~~ ` ~~ 2~ ` /~ ~ ~"!'f'a ~0~1~a ° : ~, r 1 ~ ~ 3`1 ME~DEw000 ~ (q ~.~ ~ ,t j pa ~ 4 MMERG~AN Nor eos~ ~j i ~ 1 ' ~ EN n v Q - .. %'1_ ~.. <gA,~i~/,(~,~y ~ .?: I I~Ql,[Ta+ ..` `r l uAc.!n ~W.~~~~C a ~ '. ~::'. l'~E~r'tN$ _~~ ~¢~~ .lNf ~fECAOf ~ 1 , ~~;kcW~ a TT 1 O ''YO a Q w OUTH ' p0. MtE~Gr'` t PV ,. 17 ~ I ~: •'ODENT'~ Q~v YIEeR~ A R~I` 4`E.t-~;~-~ ~° ~ pv,_ ~ ! .' ( ~ ~RL) ry! l1 ~ I~. ;~:,"4` \E~OEN ~~ ~,,~ PLANIA~~••~ / . xoaioKC wutt,er ~• ~ ~ ( ~ ,°PETTY ~R~ ti_ ;~ ~MOUN7A/N .~~ ~ 1~CNRISf1AN {CIr00l{~ ~ 9 `~Cyj,,, EH1v~t 49 V/IW ~~ __ .co,yM~NDEa;~~ £ ~, '~ euQ E ti~,~A,~j a ~ Aq `PO cIgFMSCN `'/ c CAPTAIM~ROVE °v r ~", $ SGAEENfIELD ° v ?' °t` n ll~M9+OgOk S 'S;CNARNVroO YnA , ~~ RD_ ~ NOR I ,, ~ pe" W _. elp } I~PA~ ~ ~,,,~.i~ 4 g ^e``,,~t,%OUA_..._...1t~ ~~ 1 t~a~~ > ,..1,. ' ~ AHtH~ ' ~ r \ 41i •~ LC' ANE~Tf~4I ~ M6p~RTyf Vil((W a ~' -: '~ \.w...--"1 Ast ~~ ''~ ~ ~ OR o~-- Z' +r _~~WpT ~ ,.t... CGM rf901 (~~, fAIAHU g __ _ i .., ,.. [[M ~"oa „-•• ~$U ~ALLE7~ ~SANTEE='f10~ z~sAwAMny _..-.'i S W ~ ~ ~ ~~/1CJt ~ ',' • . y,`~.~. ~Pi~t O ~ n -1 CIR ~~++p ~ IrRC JOM~)( ~ ~~..9E , ~ ~Q,?'tl' Q4. ~ \ ~ 7' ~~ORIANO ~AV ~ONtA~ ~+~ ~ -- j~ BITS QMOROT ~ 4-~XI.EY HILL • ~• ~ '~Rl ~l ^~1~~~1VDv~ I(~ ~~ I o (~ ~ I ~N~,'!~y`Q? ~ ` `'~\..~~~\~` ~ ~NEY FO MALL G < `qN~ y\ ~ B ~~ ~a'irn 1~ ,w ir9'i Z O Ct~tL M00~ i ~.~ q~uTM118 :, `~~,~+ y~~,,~~~~'o O20 °~~eAooR ~vls In A~ ~~.l~ ~,,~ I ~/' ! 0 ~ ~ !R P ~ r.m h..~ VIS1A HEIGHTS~ mt1NICIPAL RQ~~ ~ ~~ S'r a'{1'O C~ ~ttNlll. ~M, _ ~ i/ i ~ ~ F ~ EF: OR 7roLLOW GRF[R ,,1~ ; 1 d ~4 ~ ~ ` OYY GREEN ., 625 M~We~,• o '10 ~" ( i f ~y ;p ~ y~l ~iy 1 9~r+ i'O~Ft~J,+. ~ ,... .A~~MJ(OSg~ .,~~. .~f ~a,t .~ r•~Cnv ROtAI'w sr r,uC ClvrM t~~. f'PA ; ':A w ~ ~ ~ t ~i f 77 f ~~'y, ,µ ~j~y ORM ~.v,~. / •l~ yF ~ it `~ ,... yi P~ .'. O Tly?_ 7""N .RK}I,~~Ajl ~ ~ ~ a ~~' lteu Rc ~;,9o•rg,, r,~t~ •p, :'Grs^ ~ I a'ea Np , -rr~.'.~dh s•ry ~IS.RIF{*1; B•Q Y,.r ij. ks~a.. ,.,. BUR~E Q i ~~ BEAd ANT y " / .: s 1 X4621 ~Rp_/ ~ 601 J 2W° /, , ~1 ,, ~o, - ., rlNr TRL . tE oQ• ~ ~ ; t~~ E~4 ~~ t0~ ~ ~--... i !~ -` ! ~;~s~` o~, 616 i ~~ 1~ ,4- ~• / ••l 'r~ `% ~ v ~~ ' ,rig~~ ~'~ 1.:~, m~ ~~;r ~ '-' ; ~ D ~' ~ ~ ~'~ enn~ r ~oeM r:.,. , .. , ..... O~ (lOANp,~~ • ~>. Z ~ ~ ~ a2 C~~~xx~~ ~~ ~~xx~~.~.~ 1838 BOARD OF ELECTIONS E. ELIZABETH LEAH GENERAL REGISTRAR TQ: Lee Eddy, Chairman, Board of Supervisors Members, Board cf Supervisors FROM: Roanoke County Electoral Board DATE: Febr•.zary 22, 1994 ELECTORAL BOARD ELIZABETH W. STOKES CHAIRMAN ARMAND L.SANDERSON VICE CHAIRMAN WILTON B. JOHNSON SECRETARY SUBJECT: Te[:,pcrary P.elccation Qf Polling Place Fcr Hollins Precinct The Roanoke County Electoral Board met on February 22, 1994 tc discuss the need to temporarily move the voting place for the Hollins Precinct fcr the June 14, 1994 Democratic Primary. The voting place fcr this precinct is the Hollins Library. Due tc censtruction at the Library it will not be available for this election. The Electoral Board voted unanimously to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the voting place for the Hollins Precinct be moved temporarily (June 14th Democratic Primary only) from the Hollins Library to North P.canoke Baptist Church. This change must be approved by the Justice Department. I do not anticipate any greblem with approval being granted fcr this temporary change cf location. Voters will be notified as soon as approval is received from the Justice Department. cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney P.O. BOX 20884 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0089 • (703) 772-7500 • FAX: (703) 772-21 15 J --- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE 22294-4 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS STARREY PARR PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke Department of Parks and Recreation is lighting the baseball field and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Virginia Route No. 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead and underground line across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the baseball field, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 8, 1994; and a second reading was held on February 22, 1994. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's Starkey Park development. 3. That donation of a right-of-way, fifteen feet (15') in width, for an overhead and underground line(s) across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the baseball field, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 MAP SECTION 3 7 80-348 C 4 ~~ 0~/ LEyF.` 09 S~P~ ~~~ Gay SOU. ~P• £X/ST/NG FILES 8 L/NES ~1 348.253 348- 348 - 2.55 ~1 ~ I 1 I Y W W, '~: .u u m I~ "STAR KEY PARK " /s'' PROPOSED U.G. L/NE PROPOSED POLE .~ea_ ssna /~ ~, / y COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA T. D. 665000 CAVE SPRING DISTRICT OIETZOEN ~~o.u~ cie ~o ~oci~nni~~.ww APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY ROANOKE VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION T.BD.DEF)4RTMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY DRAWN BT L.M. A. DATE 11 _ 29 -93 APP. BY J, B. A.ILL SCALE 1 = 2OO' SHEET-~Of_I_.SHEETS DRAWING N0. R-3021 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS STARKEY PARK PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~~.~~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of an easement to Appalachian Power Company (APCO) for an overhead and underground electric service line(s) across Starkey Park for lighting the athletic fields and other facilities. BACKGROUND' The County of Roanoke Department of Parks and Recreation is lighting a baseball field and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Virginia Route No. 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Installation of electric transmission lines has been necessary to provide lighting to the baseball field at Starkey Park. Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way, fifteen feet (15') in width, for an overhead and underground electric service line(s) across Starkey Park, extending in a southerly direction from Crystal Creek Drive, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto. FISCAL IMPACTS' Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. .~ = ~ ALTERNATIVES' (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for donation of the electric service line(s) easement as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. u m Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix c:\wp51\doc\agendalvickie\starkey.rpt MAP SECTION 3780-348 C4 ~~l G~E~~ 09 ~P~ ~,~~. G~yS 5~G ~P• EX/ST/NG PILES & L/NES ~1 348-253 348- 348 - 2S5 1 7C W .W• 'U~ m "STAR KEY 1 PARK " /5' PROPOSED U.G. L/NE PROPOSED ~F •?48=5503 APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY I ROANOKE, V I RGI N IA PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA T. D. 665000 CAVE SPRING DISTRICT OIET2QEN i~9•M~ GTD 49J9F/~00/I2.86 DRAWN BY L . M. A. DATE 11 _ 29 -93 ' APP. BY ,J• B. A•II.I SCALE 1 =2~• SHEET ~ pf ~ SHEETS DRAWING N0. R- 3021 .T- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS STARREY PARR PROPERTY ONNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke Department of Parks and Recreation is lighting the baseball field and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Virginia Route No. 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead and underground line across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the baseball field, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 8, 1994; and a second reading was held on February 22, 1994. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made .T- / available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's Starkey Park development. 3. That donation of a right-of-way, fifteen feet (15') in width, for an overhead and underground line(s) across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the baseball field, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. c:\wp51\doc\agenda\vickie\starkey.ord 2 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~, ~~•? AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council The one year term of Frances R Holsinger will expire March 31, 1994. 2. League of Older Americans Board of Directors The one year term of Murry K. White will expire March 31, 1994. The appointment is made by the League of Older Americans at the recommendation of the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Mary H. llen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 RESOLUTION 22294-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 22, 1994, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through ~ 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. 2. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of Setter Road and 0.06 Miles of Golden Court into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Village Lane Estates. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hampden Hills, Section 4. 5. Request from the School Board for Appropriation of a $10,589 V-Quest Grant to the School Grant Fund. 6. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1994 for the Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1022. ~~eq~tes~e~-~A~g~e=a~a~-e~€-a-Bi~t~Pe-~i~~ei '-''^ D, „~ midge-~~u~re~~e~~ a~I~~ 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution with Item 7 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to continue Item 7 until the issues regarding denial are resolved, and carried by a unanimous voice vote. A COPY TESTE: ~d c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue A-22294-S.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination were made at the January 25,1994 meeting. 1. Grievance Panel two Supervisor Eddy nominated Kenneth Lussen to another three-year term which will expire February 23, Y'9'9'3~. 1996 2. Blue Ridcxe Community Services Board of Directors At their February 3, 1994 meeting, the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors recommended John M. Hudgins, Jr. to fill an existing vacancy as an at-large member. The Bylaws of the Board require that the five participating localities must concur with the Board's recommendation for the at-large member. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors and that the Board concur with the recommendation for the appointment to the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. Respectfully submitted, . Q~.C.,C.Ln/ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, .~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Adminis rator L... ~" ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Grievance Panel File Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors File Blue Ridge Community Rlta J. CaiInIBCi(I Chairman Onzlee Ware vice Chairman John M. Hudgins, Jr. Treasurer Pamela K. Cox Secretary e rv i c e s Executive Director Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. February 4, 1994 L _ Mr. Lee Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Eddy: At the February 3, 1994 meeting of the Board of Directors of Blue Ridge Community Services a resolution was passed to recommend Mr. John M. Hudgins, Jr. to fill an existing vacancy as an at-large member of the Board. The bylaws of the Board require that at-large members be recommended by the Board to the five participating localities. All five local governments must concur with the recommendation in order to confirm an appointment. Your attention to this matter will be very much appreciated. Sincerely, r ~, ~ ('' ~, ,,~r' '~ Fred P. Roessel, Jr., P~D. Executive Director FPRjr:cd C: John M. Hudgins, Jr. Rita J. Gliniecki Elmer C. Hodge EXECUTIVE OFFICES - 301 Elm Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026 (703) 345-9841 Fax: (703) 342-3855 TDD: (703) 345-0690 Serving the Cities of Roanoke antl Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke ~i A-22294-5.b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ` ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.28 Miles of Setter Road and 0.06 Miles of Golden Court into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective February 4, 1994. Golden View Acres 0.28 Miles of Setter Road (Route 1221) 0.06 Miles of Golden Court (Route 1228) SUBMITTED BY: APPRO ED .lam Mary H. Allen Elmer C. odge Clerk to the Board County Admini trator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Rnh r, _ .7nhn cnn No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens ~_ cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAV D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONEfl February 4, 1994 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: ".. As requested in your resolution dated November 30, 1993, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective February 4, 1994. ADDITIONS GOLDEN VIEW ACRES Route 1221 (Setter Road) - From Route 1224 to 0.28 mile South- west Route 1224 Route 1228 (Golden Court) - From Route 1221 to 0.06 mile West Route 1221 Sincerely, ~.~~ Ray D. Pethtel Commissioner LENGTH 0.28 Mi 0.06 Mi TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY A-22294-S.c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Village Lane Estates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Village Lane Estates, Tee Pee Enterprises, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Village Lane Estates, dated February 5, 1993, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $1,800 and $ 4,130 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Village Lane Estates subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. L- ~ SUBMITTED BY: 1 i ~1 Clifford C ai .E. Utility D for APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrat ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Denied ( ) Eddy _ Received ( ) Johnson _ Referred Kohinke _ to Minnix _ Nickens Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections M r ; ~.~ ~ ocf~'-"" ~,v~ 115 •'~\~\ Bu11{`~J ro' .•~ .rnp f r~~' ~~> ,"'`~ ~,r ~~r„ •: I s ..q 621 R ~ ~! nro / 6 ~ _` Q r cue. r( ~ q, ~ t ~ f n': `,~:{~~NFIEID s fi FJ- d, ~pLO~¢t~ND.~q~/ rNT TqI ~'~ o- tlb. "'1 ~~ 's\~ l4~ II ~r l.-f~t.01'y~ Y ~ I ~ 4rrA" C~ Y tt ~ J~ o r~i .~. ... ri"T~l~~ ~v a ~ti~sr 616 {J rrJl \ ti -~'?...:: t~ ~~a~ ~ f ~HTSL.RC- r cm. ~'~.1-..- 4MILF$$ {C.P// ~ ~ 0~1~1, ..~Pi'QQ pq~ •MW !'LI yoia.~'•, ~ .Lbril ~~ i HILL o ~ °fr~ row. 4~Y Yri l: ~ o ~_.._ ~. (fit. r ~ -v r f :.~f p BitO `'°O""` ~ ~° ~ VICINITY MAP. ~ i repj°'-~ ~"~~ L- 3 NORTH ~~ ii tr4i ~ Y ~ _,~, -y' :: ~ f ` //, ~ ~ / / ~ i /~ . ~ ~ ~~ O .~ ,• O~ ~9 . ; ~ ,~ ~ ~ - +. «, ri • • ~. ~. ~~ ~ 'f. ` . .. `~ I~q~ir i1. ~It 11 :t ~~ ~ Jti J ~` .M.lrf W P9~.11 M N^~;~- na.•r arewe. 1, .. ... ` .. .. ',1ti~•'~ , h+r IIw j ' err. r.. +l i.iN'~ .r. ~ C . Q. ~ '. M.t Mt+t t•it M'~ ~p~ ~ ; s~ \ . -E• `.pia. ... _ ~w t r T ..\ `lit\~N •1 w / arM w•1+ ~ \ ~ j/~ ' \ - ,~ f. . ~~ 1 ~µi „rt~, M tom` ~ IMtM. MIS 1~ ~``tw.Ni 1'~: MI .. ._.. .._.. .. ~pN\ p.flOw qlH .e..•~~ . / ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER FOR VILLAGE LANE ESTATES UTILITY DEPARTMENT A-22294-5.d ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Hampden Hills, Section 4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Hampden Hills, Section 4, J. C. Graybill, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled Hampden Hills, Section 4, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $10,000 and $ 16,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Hampden Hills, Section 4 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: t Clifford ig, P.E. Utility Director ~~ APPROVED: -l ~C.J Elmer C. Hodge County Adminis ra r ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x to Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ~-H NORTH _-___ _. _ ___- __. __-._ ___.. _ ____ _ - .... . ... _..~_......._ ... _ _ _. _. ... P a ~ PPt7NJf0 O A/NfC! d7lN 70 Bf !a ffww ` L.'t/AAC /IYM Att •!'• Gqy/,r0 J /CbVITPYCTLO AJ JNph'w AwO 5/Nl L mO OK' - - / (- eF 4CfOfD TO TNF JsYCN]C/Tpwt iv~fvT , \~ ~ // fN0/vN ONS EIT )OIG. Y. Jfp' Lpl f \ \\ ~ ~~ ~ I -~ 7 f. , LYTA/L rNl4 M : . / _ 7 • .Ya~~ \~ 1, °at I sN[LT -_ a.~ J~ ~°f"~!; / / i %.~ ~ _ ~~ ~ t n[w 1 1 cot'' ::f I cosy C~ ~ \~' ~ /w"y/r/fff ff \ , /Yr.N Nff fa.,i~ I Lp7I ~i~ x s• osv.Yac- e'~~ ~ tpr 9 ~ ~wr7f/ s• 5 ~ ~ ~ „:8 I I I X07, Lor L'`~ /wr/w. ee so \\ _ n ~, ~„~ ~ mrs.us J ' /wv m!•ecFlu/sr1D ~\ ~ Y,~m ~~ \ '~ MaJ `s 1~`a '• ° t~ o.%i' Vf `1 \ " S1A.Of 1 ~. ` i~ ~h~ I L JTjra.f. i JJYN w/O/ /! A J7RRpotE `Z fR ~ ~ \ ~ J.f . "l 4 •. uO p . N[ ANO 11MJ CY77/MG O! ~ Tp / ~ •, O b S Qa ~ sfw~-u' ~ ~ 1/J/IAYi JAN/7ARY J(MfA' 1 a , •J Fp E(Oav[OY 7NE frff.•' cg ~ , fM~ //~ rf\~vtJ \\ try 111 ;~ ~N~=i3wla ~~ w ~ c.a~b fcE couvlY YT/c/rr O[/AP7- r`f+i, .w= +` ~ °r M, ~~ 3~ l w: G'• ~~ v~ ~~( I v~ :: 11 Lr.fetrla 7M/J NOPK AWJ7 tlE AAPAACEO f~faf~ ~O„r~ r~ ~ 11~ ~ Y h 0,41• 'M th J J7JI•J' rJ ewJ/NCtf DAYf .w AprANCC ~ a.: fiN Yfo \ ~• ~ ~ \ ~3 \ ~ \ O'I ~~ mN:J' I St ILL/MC: ~ O L \ ~ \ h 11`~M ~ yh I ~ ~V 1 Atl[E CARP/CO \ prV \ c ~A~i I ~~ ~ y$ $~ ACYM7KE CIWMT'Y!/L/7Y OE/I ~ `~Li (r , TIl~Je 71G/07 \ \ `~ \\S~ ~ 'i~_ __ ~ _.~ I 1 f 1'~ \ ~ ~-/sP o_ i ._L... _~ ~ \ - - ____ ~ AS BUILT PLANS ~ ~~ as, s YAKIAet( ~g~8 ~`'~` ~' ,_ \\ ~.j~~F 7 PIGN7. pf WAY , ,~, :~P.~ DATE: sE~r. u, pass •„ yy ' SAMTARt SEWER ~ WATER LWE E T ~ t p PLANSL^ALE~ /'30' ~`<o~ "~~RO t ~ 5 A ~2 ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF WATER ~ SEWER SERVING HAMPTON HILLS, SECTION 4 A-22294-5.e ACTION # ITEM NUMBER L"~.5 MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Commonwealt of Virginia has received a $9.6 million grant from the National Science Foundation to institute systemic reform in science and mathematics education K-12. Roanoke County will be involved in two components: school based mathematics and science lead teachers in the elementary schools, and new pre/in-service models. Of the $9.6 million, Radford University was awarded $220,103 to develop curriculum changes in the pre/in-service model. Roanoke County and Radford University have formed a consortium to develop curriculum changes, and Roanoke County has been designated to receive $10,598 from the Radford University allocation. These funds will pay substitute teachers and salaries for summer curriculum work, purchase materials and supplies, and reimburse travel expenses. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Expenses will be covered by the $10,598 allocation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of the $10,598 to the School Grant Fund. 7~ ~-e-- ..e~., Billie A. Reid Supervisor of Science ./ 'U ' Elmer C. Hod County Administr for ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix x To Nickens x cc: file Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance .." ~"'. FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 10, 1994 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR THE V-QUEST GRANT. WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has been awarded $10,589 through Virginia Quality Education in Sciences and Technology (V-QUEST), funded by the National Science Foundation to initiate a systemic reform in science and math education, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County Schools has formed a consortium with Radford University to develop said changes and the grant money will be used in conjunction with the consortium to fund substitute pay, summer curriculum work, materials and supplies, and travel; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded requests an appropriation by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in the amount of $10,589 to the School Grant Fund for the V-QUEST grant. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Charlsie S. Pafford, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Barbara B. Chewning TESTES ~~. ~ ~,~ Clerk A-22294-S.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1994 from the Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1022 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION The Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1002 has requested a permit to hold 50/50 Raffles in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1994 on the dates listed in the application. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the calendar year 1994 from the Women of the Moose Roanoke Chapter 1002 be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. lien Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: mer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION ~_ ~ Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting, a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The.Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of Organization a k ~: C/~,•~ t~ ~ /o ~'' Mailing Address ~~~ C.', ,%~-~~ 'x /,~' yl ~~ City, State, Zip Code ~o;~-,mil k~ j~~ ~~~.Ld'~" ~ ~~ y When was the organization founded? Purpose and Type of organization Bas the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES / NO Is the organization non-profit? YES r/ NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? f~=` Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~/F COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to $ 38.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation / r of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, Li}o managing, or conducting Raffles ? 'y DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Description DATE OF RAFFLE If this application is dates raffles will be T ~u,~~~ ~l, i~, ~ ~~ 9~ 1 /"~~~/~~L/` ~, ~J~l /CJ'r~/ ~~/ ~, /), /c~~~ ~~.~ ~ '', z ~ ~ ~ 9 ~~ Fair Market Value for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all held. yy~~ S; ~'i ~~9'f ` `"y f~~~~ 5~ ~?~ i r~~ / J ~ ~~p tr,, ~~ z~ e, ~ ~, ~ ~j ~ y /I P C.t:yr~ ~ ~-ice ~i ~!;ci / ~ ~j f Raffle drawing is to be conducted? Specific location where s ~e mit shall be va or n. /'~,' Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code $4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~~ ~~~ ~~ .~t~~~~~ ~ ~ f n ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~-1~A~ ;. ~ ~ 1 ,~ ~~ ~ e f'i,'~ ~ ~ fig/ ~_~_~ C=ti'c~ // , ~~~ ~~ _ i COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a Officers of the Organization: ~N 1 G~' ~ l ~~ ~~~~ n .~ „~ • ~~ ~/~ ,~ hC rl ~~ Phone : fC~~ J `1Z ~ `~3 7 ~ (,,,,,~ Address : ~~ r~1~~., ~F~~~4R ~~ ~~~ /~?--hca /C ~- /~,~ ,~ 5~~' / ~O cfc ~.- ~~e°sT tc%r3/~ Phone Address: f~'/~ ~/~~~ ~~2~/ ~~~. f-~~ f" ~~/f~~~r ~~~ ~~/$..~ f; ~ ~'OR-~~~ ~ ~(/a dl:/.~1~1- ~~, ,C~ ~ Cti1 Phone : 7C~3 - `f 7~'"<S S 9~ Address:~~, ~ ~~~, ~~;%~ ~iNc~f's~~~~ r%.~i ~' ~G 7 ~' Treasurer : ~~F~/' y ~fZ.~-,~/~,~ S L D Phone Address: Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name : -~ 1 ~ o~~ ~l£- ~~ ~_ E ~ ~_~-~- C C~ Home Address ~~~ ~1 "~ ~ ~ ~~:.~~ ~ ~ _~~= ~,~ ~ ~~ ` ~~ ~'~- ~-~ ,~ Phone C~{~;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ( Bus Phone Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name : ~~Q ° ~,~~~~ ~ ~1~ a ~~ Home Address ~'/ ,~ ~,~'~~ ~~ ~,~ ~~,~.c~~il-F.°i, ~~ ~ f° J~ Phone ~'v~ -~~~ ~Z~,~ Bus Phone Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~'~, Bas your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? yeS IF ALL QIIESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COiI1VTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 .. .. NOTARIZATION THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. sect. of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. sect. of the Roanoke County Code. Signed by: Title Home Address 6 Subscribed and sworn before me, this Z~ day o€-~~M-y199~Y L- ~ ~ ~~~~~~ in the 19 ~~/511Nm0~e~ilj~.`:Ft4a'rr`u:,~w_!F~,,d. ... County/City of IC,o~~~ , Virginia. U My commission expires: tary Publi NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~- ~_ 1 ~ ~; Date Commissioner the Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMI~~IISSIONER OF T'HE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 i ~ ~'o~~-~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Bingo Permit for Calendar Year 1994 from the Blue Ridge Council of the Blind, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• The Blue Ridge Council of the Blind, Inc. has requested a permit to hold Bingo games in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1994 on the dates listed in the application. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be denied. The application is attached and a check for $25.00 has been submited to pay the fee. Commissioner of the Revenue Wayne Compton will be available at the meeting to answer questions regarding his denial of the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION• The Commissioner of the Revenue recommends that the application for a Bingo Permit for the calendar year 1994 from the Blue Ridge Council of the Blind, Inc. be denied. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. odg Clerk to the Board County Administrator -------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens G_ r~ ~' "' COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Beginning Balance at $6,936,009 July 1, 1993 (Audited) Original 1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve 80,668 August 24, 1993 VDOT Revenue Sharing Match (25,000) October 26, 1993 Purchase of ladder truck (203,733) January 3, 1994 IDA -acquire 15 acres from Friendship Manor (272,500) January 11, 1994 IDA donation -balance of land acquisition from Friendship Manor and water line installation (190,000) January 11, 1994 IDA donation -Jack Smith Park land acquisition (99,189) January 25, 1994 Purchase of 2 Knuckle Booms (132,600) January 25, 1994 General Services Supplemental Allocation 400 000 Balance at February 22, 1994 $5,6~ 93,655 Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance % of General Fund Expenditures Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447). ~~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Audited) July 13, 1993 Northside High School Ball Fields January 25, 1994 Environmental Assessment Work - Pinkard Court Balance as of February 22, 1994 Submitted by c-ac.y„cJ ~V. ~c-~ 0 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $136,635 (62,000) 2 600 $7 V' COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 $100,000 July 13, 1993 Clerk of Circuit Court New Position (26,400) October 26, 1993 Codification of County Code 6 500 Balance as of February 22, 1994 $$ 6_ Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance .~ P •-• pp 0 0 o ~ o N 0 0 W W C? h- d' C! ~yy m a .C, U rtl .L, ~ > U T C 7 O U Y L O a d n n • r a o n a m°~ N^ ;? a o_ o a ~ N~~ ~~ N ~ n n ~ n a _.~ ~ ~ a aa .°~ e+ n n~ °a as n~ °a S "o r3"dS ,^o Z6$ e o_ r~ n ~__ fir. f :. ~ ` ~ : ,. b_ i 7 ^ 4- 1 l I fd N U' o P- V- 41 f~ N o aq CU f~- 0 0.l f~! o lfl o L!Y ,- m G~ .- o .- 0 0 4 O q. ~ M O ~O -- W O In 4 4~ U1 •- o {~j ltl O c~.t~- Ut 1~ 0 ~f o h- O ^ ~ o UJ i, W N .' OII I a~ it o+ 0+ W c+ v N j ,- b + ~ N ^ N a0 v T•) V} .- m.-.:. u1 41 G~ v, pp a~j tn. , [~ ro I ZY N ~ b L~ N ~t Ul m In Ul (U 7 V o .T ^ a 1 m~I ~ o q to :1 t- In I m i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ . C` ~ 'O i O y t C •-..o f o bbU c~U1C 0+c._` { I I I { { I 1 c. .„~i V'N v In {'ob4J W.:~. MC~U0.~. ~t Mo .. ~ .p r` N U I of o tom' .:. b tt o) N Rt ~ V' 9' c. o U1 o .-- o M 0) M o+ C N :w W.. f^- b o) .-: 07 N t b 4 N M tt to b V' ^ OJ o V op v Lfl ~ M >l11 of - u~ M \ •-• rHp t b I ~ l~ o) p V' L' N V' b III b V' b o f~ ' 4l M N LA v o+ o+ 0 0.4) t<~ M ov o N _ ~ b O+ o v m I 4 - c+ N 4T G I ~ N N 0.l V' .- j b M1 W o+ C. o q• r- m 1 f 1 N ^ I It ~ ^ ~ . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i 1 ul_I CUM v, .-. M hl et M41~~ 1 o,d• U) M p h~ o O ,- a Lfi N ~ it lf1 ry• a b M M + N o ~ a0" V•.. b O T ~ ~ OJ ~ d : I ll ~ U~ N: {{ ^ N ~ { 4l 4l .J P OCR W c o.-^MC~ll~~loN c ~ 41.-- O+M In M N b L(N Ul Q M '~t 'I# Di h- o ~(} Q v ([y ._ t~j N A ~ { D C 1 ~ t i ~ { j- b F . ~ 2 F- N 1 ~ CJ w O .- 4) Ul ~ Ln 41 ~'' c~ V M nl UJ .p O+ d 4° *Y .~. .- N 0] ~N Ch o O sp N m CU ac M I!I V et 1~ O M N o CU I-l •-. tN .-• ^• O(} t,l Ui o N t OJ M : N N I ?- > 1 d 1 tf U1. ~ ' N cl 1 N N N N o J .- .- ,- t~ ~ V• N ,- ~ c N o Lfl ~ I ~ ~ N i ~ L i ~ I l ` ] '1 tnI .n n' ti 0) M y 4) ~ N ''' ~ c~ 44 o G~ 01 ~- 0 06 W M .n N I N b r- N I UI b~ b o b CO • b h GGG ~~~ TY r MMlT oM NM1~4l N ^ C ~ V N p~ t~ o ~ G+ h- +O llT M .- OD C~1 N o C b _ . ~ ~ C C :I +~ a I. - G o N C~ 07 M M ~ M U'i ti c U-i c~~ v 4'I N W N ~U ib i~! 41 O•~ o) `~ o c~ ` V• C 4+ C > I M ~ a 06 O1 I r- q' U~ _ r f~ st f~ o O N l I '- N ~ E ~ I I ~ ^ G U l I q O O o OO O O CI OOC.~ J . OO 0 0 C?: OOCfi: O 0.:. 0 0 CEO O Nc~' b 0 O O OO OO O p Np b0 O ~nrp'O ~ .O.p 4l 4' 7 Y) U{ C1 c O O b O O G~ O O O O C}. O 0.. F O O ~ O O O .- O o ~7 O I 1 ~ I O .. U_ ro r ~ cJ 111 oN OO coo OO oM UlO h-tn OUl~ O+O) M O 4141 NO{,(I 41 4]lf1 ~ 4)trI` voo M N ON~. 7 1 .-j Ul .O Ur V' ~T 'ct N c mh- asN ~~ rub Y ~ N aUI CO :..I t .. .. ^ o Cu 1 ~ M U) u) R CU I`- _ I N f C y Oi 61 ` I O ~ ~ ~ W ~ T f ~ ~ -. c r, ~ ~ L E ro j ~. m m a v •" N 3 N f• d i C O U m N W O L •.-I CA : m° ~- x I b C d 01 y 1f1 o > ~ b F--a' ~ m °A t a q, v- w u) E c . m• DO ro as GIL L ~LL w ~ ~ ~ r ~~ a cn ~ uy a o W . o a~ U o G I- " pJ ~ d ~ d QI MQ• Qro b I : n ' >t L ~ x r N m n 'O N Q U. M LL QI UI N .-I O . .r i., ,..r y ~ } rq N 0+ W m C L N C QI 7 ~ ~ L N .r m U? N LL. . -O a+ L ~ d 4~. F•t El ~ F- N x O C 'n . a N •.+ I •.r 1 1 .. L~: m, E E d: N U U 'D U V ~ C- > N~ F- N U d Ut 7 O V L L L d U L U) Q 4. L N .~. ~ J d -.. L J CL N Q 01". N ,U - 4- ti O:.L O C ro '+ v, ro k N N C ' m V h-. ~ 4 10 N 'L ' '' ' IQ ~J ro C U r u) ~ C ut -~ o >. ~ ; i d d O O •. 1- a C UI a o a m a cn L +• a• a. LL y G- y I O •.. N .-r 7 N L C V ~. I N •y U ~0 i+ - U' 7 7 N. I W N L Y L a+ I L •.a x.D: C C Q~~.. > V IO m N N L 4-.~ 11 •-} L T ~ x .-I ~ N N ro E L;+• N W L...E: O I 4- U ~ U d : . 1 C .D d 7 U m O~ N m ~ L: N Y~ x 'ti ~ O t C L >> ro •.•~ U C .+ 7~ .r 7 t O ~' N ' , m a n. _. a JU mLL -. F-~ t- . i d t N d L 4~ d O d '9' d V + q Jd Ud CJ:~ ULL ~Z 3 W 3 W O ~ G. r- Z ~ ^ N ~t o ^ N P N M N N t!1 b co OJ N C N m^ N N X06 o .- N o- b o V' I~ o N N N M M ) c M S'^ M L` O O O O O O O O G , , r tt ~..tn ) UI b .p b Opp t o O O OO O O O b: O O OO o . O O O O. q N 0? 0 0 o \ o N 0 0 W W t7 F- Q Q 0. O N .~ C .~ L Q~ x 0 C 0 a +. C 7 O V M ~l 0 S 0 A O a a n n r n o n o a o^ N ~ a c o n o w - - ~ N~~ ~~ n° - ~ riI:S ~s~ a dl• ~~ a a g ~,o ~~~~ n n ~~ - $ e ~~a $ o~~ ~ o n n. I .. ,... . I N i I ~ I d i 7 I C 0. I ~ > ,N.I d \'~1 ~ b f ~ N 7 ~ ~ F- N I I ~- m I f I a a I .~ ~ r~ U I hl (~l 'N I o o Q a m t o o L C0 1 W C I cG 01 i i I- ~ ' ' I V' '.' q I o 1. Ut 1 O+ 7 v l o `7 1 ]? O C I U+ . S h Qi I ~S+ ` r > I o I ~, I r~ _ i tr __ 1 r<. ~ ~ ~ 1 a~ N M a.r? W `.I 7~ O O J .-. (7 I 4 LCS.t N N t+'r Qa s_ 1 N N » G +>' I N N o a i i ~' I V ~ ? ] I ~ ~ lTi c ~7' a I 1 IL Lt I v ~ J -~ I c } a _ i.u ':.l _ N 1 N i L I O:i :,. d C 0 o t' A j L~ Q ti. O F- O 2 '_ a '' { f ..~ _, 4~ '- Q) O O O \ o DJ 0 0 W W c~ ~- d ^ N O C O T C 7 () V ++ O a d ~Nn Y n Ohm00 N ndD Oh00 $ NNN O NUJ FO I' ~'1 X1 11 tl) a O d • Y Y Y 111'g p DEn n vii ~~ $ o~au m~6 ~ygt,_ [_n~t~. : ff I ~ ~ M_ V - 4- O I o o aO P N .- C • ui -: O+ W N I"-:0 ~ W h••;O I G ~ O) ~ V D7 G+ W U i ol fl.o o)w m oo tn Wo tito'.. -ten W c0or-No. Q x~ U \ 1 v~ t! 1 ~ V U l N .o O ] tlf ltl W ~U ~o tit R 7 Ul m tri W N 1 ~l .b !ii 1 2 t I I ~^ ~ .~ . - W o r - t~ r. ~ V' M l11 .p C' M' W N N ~ W N h .~ - t N ~ P In V1 0 ) n; V w o 0 o V V o N M V N (- -- W lf i uti u o f .~ i~ ~ .- N M .- C• 7 N ~ M V N o lli N E 7 I I M r• ~ C 0. Ll G, ~l r~i r N SU ~ M V' tfi :G+ N N Vl OD W ~ fU L I N • W P .n f O+ ~ ' o C+ i~i f- a0 Ur M f.~ M hl : C• ~ N - V ~ C V ~ N to c :'- ~, NoD' _. M _ .- ~ !ll O C ', 1 N N ( N M N ,~ V. N. ~ ~ ~' '; C- J7 l I _~ •- J , N N 0. ~~c, ~ a~ f~ Vl N .-.ofS' M v N ~h M ot11 G~ . - I`• ~ G „r r` OD V' o 'R M OD ~ G) OQ ~ M o N W In N ~ ~ 7 I ~ ! • ~ N N N N C N ~ ~ ~ U ~ >G I 1 111 o N tfY fU -- ~ o .N ^ ~ Ol N W o N ~ o 111 rt ° C W 1 ~ y c+ o to .- ' N aD N c ti o .0.:. .. .. v •- ~l t W v RJ ~ . .- o ,- M N v N M tlt ,- t~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 U1 ' .- ltt x I II •- I C 1 In ~ • N M r~ Q+ N I~ r- W t!1 ~ f o L' o l,) u, ~... ~. i b N N tfi u W G+ o V1 .- M.:f~-:`. o ~ a ~ :qy M V V1 M h V .- u N tit Lft G} ltt N ~ W N Ji S N 1 T M h M !!t N ~ V' N ~ ~O ui .- ~. i V M N iV M m. L'i ~ I ~+. I I N .- . V' u1 ~~ ~ L p j ~ 'p i ~ ? • I ltt V V V V' V r1 O Gam. ' ~f M ~ ~ V' V O~ C ~ rr ~ • ~• •• 1 I I N O N u Gti G 7 v r` •- 1 ' v r .- v .- G~ ~ u~ N r`t ~ .- " .- V a) o M OD tt P- xf M ~. a0 -- t ~ '.L I h ti Q+ C~~ W i .- u1 N Ui o 0 0 ~• G ~ Y ' C 1 1 - V' f0 ~ o .- ~ ~ N V' N ~ p 1 In K iV N h N ~ ~ i I .-. ~~ v M f M ~ in i ~ ( tai ,- N Li as .- C ACi u M .- o lfl ~ N 0 ~ ~ '~ of o 7:N V' oDM~ yN o MoDV o W ~ ~~~111 i -~ u M; t!t h- N atl N to r ~ In N Ifi T 7 u 1 tit h f~- r- r ~ ~ Ll r G+ i`'1; M st• } ~ •-. {V q .- f~ N h• OD f~- ~ :.~ ' ~ ~ {' N N :.. lf~ N ~b. r` V• Ul o t f ~ d• V c, t o0 M N ~ I CA { G~ ltt: -- ` N V o OJ N tom- .n M ~ M ~ I 1 ~ N { ~ ~ , nJ _. .1.11_ CJ N .. u M d . I C ~ ~ m j C ~ ~ ~ j " O C ~ J~ U ~ O U .w L m .ti j u ~ !f * ~ ..~ ~ ^y N ti" 7- N ~ ( O C T ilt U i W -J v., O 6, C L F . J +, m ~ . ~ o F- C: a d G x 0. c ly. - L O 6, F- l ~ '. a, ,. '. tJ1 ;~ N 3 N m W Y 6l ,.y .ti y ~ U .. • N N d 666111 O ` ..•~ N m d •.. L C .-~ n-~ c.g a m c E a ~b L p ~' ~ U ,- a a s a c- a .-, v. c c ~ M _ C C 7 N U` E d 7 N C O 0r +' L O ;.8 ,' 11 • .+ >G O N d d d •~ ~ Z O N E C U.-~ O 6~N 6~ N o U .,, ~„ ~ a' ~ 7 ~ ~ 3 L •.i ''; 4- ... C C * ~' J W V~ ~ ~6 lry~ J O C 0U~+ U Q f d N Y E . N d f9 U' d d 111 7 7 3 : C O 4. V7 i-r ~- ~ Z °' o o ` o ~ o o L ;l I O I I o`.llt` I o lll.. tll O lft o O Lrt ~ o ~ M ~ (U iV ~ ~ M. ~' N. ' N M V' N M V'..tT u' ° ~ • o - 0 N A# N M M M . .• ., V 7 V 1 t rt LA U N V'1 o i o °~ 0 0 0 ;. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~' [T N N O O O o N 0 0 ww c~ 1- ¢¢ a^ c~ M rtQ\ ro~ C ! o U .UI~1 W 'M V Q .~! p~p ^ F~ V_ .dY ~ O O y V? A Lt O I 4: S 4- F- O ~ Z O ~ E M C . J 7 d O U V W Cn C1 W 0 iJ V ^ ^ O a d N n, r p C h OI O O _-_ - - N q^ O D h O QI N N N -.., N N N ~ 01 II Il ~ ~S _ ail {~ q .? S 9 S Y O Y p tl q~ O O 11 D D O O ID V ~ b O O O O ~f N tom. n ~1~ I i ~ i D _~ q '+- O 1 i •--- h} a l N t- o; h - ~ iu o ~ ~ ~ N N q~ o o o 0 0 i ~ o a E f ft Lfl a0 l!1 I~ o r i `n 'V' d o 0 0 0 (mot o {n o (1 7 \ I U N U ~ j ~V : i Ul .a U 7 l a~ t ' In N to ~ c~ ~c Mo ap t` ~ C ~: i J i . N Ul M C~J V' V' tf1 st W,. 1 Ul ~ ro= .I 1 ~ ~ I I 1 d : I M G+ 0 0.i U Ul ~ M tJl ~, ~ V, .a o o '. a>U p, ~• r- L : d 1 M I M •- 7 IIl0 h ~ 0~N ~ ~ a7 N Ul cam N M 0'~ ~ M W q V'O a0 N ~~cu~TTT o V W~dO:o N~Q V G, l11 If1 N t E 1 M W M. Ul DJ Gw N N •- V ct 7 ut V ,- C~ U} .- iJ :J I to 00 v .- N N Ul V c, o V' ~o In : UI ~ ~ M t,~ ~ ~ .. ; o? V } V'1 9 V N N : .- to N m c. d 1 .- _ C > 1 N Q ~ - l N :. d : 1 e, lh 4 lr} er V• M 0 •t ~Ui o au o 4 <fi i o'i V i~l L J] t ~ N V- N... ti l11 Imo: M .0 0 ap 7 E I o C lt1.M1 .- o ffJ aD i W G, ~ o c~ ~ ~ ~ U T3 C 1 u'i 1 k~ N N ~ U}u O W ~ N ~4~ {U N v mM L'1 ~ ~ ~ u} Nt ~ o L W ~O N M N M Ui M h . 1 G~ d I 1 N ~ _ ~.~J ~ i [~ i .- i o C o- k, I r i ~ c x :... I 1 i - lft OO~~ a M o~ m M : 4 ' t N ~ .- .- ,- ~ N CG C 1 ro I i~l c+ c~ o ~ c> +' I v r~ r<~ >n 1 +, I J ..0.. 1 ~ i i I tr M t m Ul.~ ~ r-• N .p i f•1 4 V 0.i W i i . i~~ Jii ~~. i~J a W J T I r m c o d a ~ ~ ~ M N Ul CU t} I~ I.tl a+ I`• 07 u} ~o t ~1 t~• f~ t~ L i .~ v o a oa -- o? o V• 111 c0 r y~ f o t,. r. C; O I - f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ i i N trl ~ ~- M o _ h: I O 1 r ~ ~ _ ~ M ~ ~ i11 'R ~Ui N In 00 0 ~ c~ <YO ~ abC N .o C 1 M i ,,, LLL 1 '' ~ No ~, o(`-o .. N o? r-ho oo: N`n ~ M ~, 7 V 1 C.~ -} .- Ul ,- o N OJ ,- ~ o Lft qq M W tt o a• .- t C i~ _ i ~ ~ ,- N o :o N N N t~• 0] N P t~ Ill ~a ~ N O~ .r I N 'P ~ TI N M v CJ .- In sr [b ro 1 N ~ M '^ L d I R V C A ... U' N E C U E +~:: 7 4 C9 C 7 A b C C ro O 2 U wy L °. d N. U G 1 [--. lT E d ., p ql +~ L O C O R ,..~ ., 1 M t' d .-t d C .-i ~~ V A a+ A d .. ~ O ~ O f~ E C O C .. 7 O ~ L UI d L ^ 4- O O!!= d ro I UI O . C C C1? U ~ H U7 ~ V ~+ U .-a N L O O "' d ~C Ad T ~tC~ CA + • d N ~ E O ~ ~ d t+ U ++ ~+ A ++ ro m C 4.. L. UI r U +~ v L L .ter J y L> '+ d ti d ro ¢ cx o~ c o rov• ~ o c v . u .- d m m o w a o 7 In a o. +• an d u U ~ N U1 N E C 7 L-,••, r ~ U L G > U V O d C d E L O •~+ 'O T A Q 1- A L d d ar +- Y ~ ro a w Aar L o d d ¢.d u... v > C L` c L ~ T 'v L f- ~ c~ rnY I-u d,Am• ., ca da L c w A J] o p ro. ... U o IT O o ~ o, f+ ..1 O L U C_ O >+ .. C d C L Y : ~ Vr .p M t Ul ~ ~ L N C d +~ O O? . d d O. !n •ti a C L T • U L J 7 !n C A O J] N x N U.4_ a C A > ;-, }} .. co a~ ¢c~ acJ ax ^E ~~ c» ^ O o 0 0 Ul o o o l11 Ut u} o o N LP Z ~ l11 ~ V U} .- : N tt t!1 - ~ .- N M V' In lTi tr l ~O Lfl N N t` au N CU tb C l7+ a+ t~ U+ (T G~ (7 + G~ W o. ~ 0 00 ~ oo 0o Qo0 oO.~oO 6 II ~ ~ 0 t I n ~ r m m ~ o a o~ n o a o o n o a~ N `~ ~ n~ g . ~n~ ~~~Iii o~ M W 0 0 o ~ o N 0 0 W W ~ N a v U 4- i [~ CAO I N d '..E '. ~ I N , 7 \ Gi 1 x U 1 N W C rt ~ I W ~ 1 CI l0 CQ F- b N } '. 1 ~ I N '. _N I l1l lf1 O : d i C'. '.; V' ~ 1 r ,E I N _' N ~ 7 "" ~ U I W OJ ~- C O C I C.: Gti C 1 h'F I M V N Q \ 1-.n I tY. tl' ~ C \ .,, U i ~J fU 'D ~ 'A C -- i lJl ltl C o C W I N 9J rn In w a w l c~ S-' N' ••+ U < W 1 > C ~ U ~ 1 N N ' . C.:4. I ~o. I~ d ~ D Ll i CO : 0? Y E. o ' u? ,~ I o 0 C -G IN 1 M!.:: M N v.: j r~ M O I ~ ~. 1 4- F O O =Z pl 1 v o T ~ 1 ~l Ltl ~' a 1 'o ~ C J. ,-i V (p = C ~ ~ ~ r-~ ' O 1 ~...:: I CU CU L(1 '. IA ~ I I 7 V' C 1 7 I L, a, tl I ~ ~ _ 1 0 - o ~ 1 ~ CU CJ C I to oD d C d ~ I 0 ~ Z', lL J (U ¢ J F- ~ ~ ~ F-- ~ T ~ a o ~ z Y ~- ^ ¢. O Z ~ a ~ a a o: ~ ~ - ° , '~~ i,~y! ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ '' S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -January 1994 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 1/14/94 1/28/94 1/28/94 1/28/94 $ 536,508.92 533,200.16 (517.66) 490.86 ~ $1,298,156.21 1 1,069,682.28 $2,367,838.49 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~' ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B). FISCAL IMPACT' None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approv , r__ '~~-1~~ ,7"14_ ~ ~~i ~,~; I hn M. Chambliss Jr.~v" Elmer C. Hod e Assistant County Administrator County Admi istrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE ~~ Attachment A February 22, 1994 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY Sealed bids for construction were opened on January 18, 1994. The two low bidders offered costs that are within the limits of the project budget for construction. Procurement staff and the architect have checked the low bids for technical compliance, and have reviewed the experience and past projects of the contractors. A contract should be offered for consideration by the Board at their February 22 meeting. VALLEY TECHPARK The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is bidding this project on February 15, 1994. The winning contractor will begin work on or about May 1. All water and sewer line extension work will have to be completed before VDOT's contractor can begin work. The Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development is working with the Department of Economic Development as well as the Utility Department to determine which water and sewer lines are eligible for funding under the Community Development Block Grant. Once this is determined, Roanoke County will bid the water and sewer work as one or two separate projects. To be included in the eligible water and sewer line bid package will be a request for bids related to the 4.5 acre stormwater management facility. Additionally, a grading plan is being prepared and bids will be requested for that aspect of the project within the next month. Appalachian Power Company and Roanoke Gas are both ready to extend services. Roanoke Gas has determined that they will charge the County 556,000 to extend their gas line to the developable portion of the park. Roanoke County will be eligible to receive a rebate of this amount over the next 3 years from any Roanoke Gas customer hooking up to the 1.5 mile extension. APCO does not expect to receive payment from Roanoke County for extending their service. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,500,000 S 80,896.70 PROJECT COORDINATOR: SPENCER WTTS ACCOUNT CODE: 104030 ae COMMENTS: Sealed bids for construction were opened on January 18, 1994. The two low bidders offered costs that are within the limits of the project budget for construction. Procurement staff and the architect have checked the low bids for technical compliance, and have reviewed the experience and past projects of the contractors. A contract should be offered for consideration by the Board at their February 22 meeting. 1 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 BUDGET E 2,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSOM ACCOUNT CODE: 104040 a-~O TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE PLANNED FOR BIDS ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL I CONSTRUCTION SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED COMPLETION ACTUAL PROJECT PLANNED CLOSEOUT ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The firm of Draper Aden is preparing the feasibility study. DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 90,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORIOIAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 ~-b TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL ............ . MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL ....... BID, PRE-BID PLANNED CONFERENCE ACTUAL AWARD PLANNED CONTRACT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: As a result of Board meeting, Option 5 is now being discussed with Paul Mahoney for legal advice. 3 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 ~-* r, DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 75,000 S 97,500 522,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 704050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PHASE I PLANNED 11 ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS/VDOT ACTUAL BID PLANNED ACTUAL AWARD PLANNED CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 22 000 COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. Phase I Murray Run below F & W building (Upstream from Phase II) 3. Phase II trunk line along Colony Lane and drainage easement. 4. Discuss curb and gutter option with VDOT along portion of Colony Lane. 5. Phase I - 57,500 from F & W and 515,000 from Drainage Budget Phase I1 - 575,000 from Bond 6. P-120 to be constructed with Phase II. 4 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 75,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCN YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING (FIELD) ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 7 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: No permanent easements are needed. 5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - MT. VERNON HEIGHTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 20,000 S 20,000.00 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 O , l~ TASK 7 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET KITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL HOURLY PLANNED CONTRACT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Project is 95% complete. The weather has caused some delays. 6 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 7 994 oe DRAINAGE PROJECTS - WOLFE CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 50,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCN 1IORKMAN ACCOl1NT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP SELECT PLANNED SURVEYING FIRM ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED (AERIAL) ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED I MEET WITH VDOT I PLANNED MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL PRE-BID PLANNED CONFERENCE (BID) ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNE ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. VDOT participation at crossing of creek on Stoneridge Circle. 7 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 300,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 (~ -~ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP RfP PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES ACTUAL SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED WATERSHED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL PLANNED POLICY ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED INVESTIGATION ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Request for proposal is being prepared. 8 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 Expenditures: 5382,153 Encumbered: E233,917 PROJECT COORDIRATOR: JOHN CNAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104209, 104201, 104203 104204 N = ENCUMBERED EXPENSES o-~ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP WALROND PARK PLANNED 31 000 >EGi7H Et'!N'`:? SOCCER FIELD ACTUAL z<#~~~iX< ............ ............. >~~~0 ............. ............ #j~ `fa0fi> ALROND PARK LANNED 2 000 ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ ~£H ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. GiYN> 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL N27 253 ~~f1z<~ ~~#~#)`:••'•~< 8£f3`z ~~~t1N:~: NORTHSIDE PLANNED 52 000 REALIGN FIELDS ACTUAL 52 538 ~j~R`!N€> ~:(3H`': >€€GR'~i€> >~4H€ BONSACK PARK PLANNED 20 000 BALL FIELD ACTUAL 27,549 <`~~~Qf€ >fAff<€ <GQNi~f [i[i9~~< BONSACK PARK PLANNED 15,000 PICNIC SHELTER ACTUAL 9,516 z£Oli GRaI#> >~ON- <~QN> BONSACK PARK PLANNED 10 000 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ACTUAL <8~#X> >Bif) <8€~ <8i~3`: VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 62 000 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL `~*I~Cr'~ ~i"~#6<€'. #`:'`:1:1~G< '#>fti~<'.€'. VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150 000 HT SOCCER LIG «:»<»>::»:: >::>::>::>::>::>::: ::<:::>::>::»: FIELD ACTUAL 143,096 '€€C'.r<~: #3zzi<€': ~~: . .::.::.::.... ............: ::::::::::::. :::::::::::: :::::..:::::. :.::::::::::: TOTAL PLANNED 402 000 ACTUAL 259,952 COMMENTS: Northside Ballfields - The contractor has finished the grading and the ground has been seeded. The fencing is being installed. The hook up to the water main will occur with the development of the forensics Lab adjacent to our property. Bonsack Park - Grading for the development of the baseball field, entrance and parking area has been completed. The picnic shelter has been purchased and construction will be finished during the month of January (weather permitting). The play apparatus has been bid and will likely be installed during the winter months or early spring. Walrond Park - The County has awarded the contract for the excavation work necessary to finish the development of the baseball fields and soccer field at this site. Weather prevented the start of this work during January. 9 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS o-~ BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE E 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CNAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104204, 104210, 104212 104205, 104207 N = tNLUMCtKCU tAYCNJtJ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25 000 :~NFs>: <:EIfE`t:: :::~:~p:;: ::GGiW:: ::E!]t1:: PARKING ACTUAL 8i~0•< >>~IsIG< «~i~0' `<~1fCs## VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25,000 RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL ~I;lfx`'»: >~ff~a> I1:1~G< ~`~iiir:>: VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 50 000 ~::. :::::~#tG~~ ~l~fi ~£~1 '~iW .:. ............ LIGHT BASEBALL ACTUAL ...... VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25,000 ::~ktr ~1 ~~~#~ € £~E1;. € Ct1N:€:<: ..,,.......;. CONCESSION/ ~::::>::::>::>::: ::::.::>.:«:::: :::~::::»i:;:: STORAGE ACTUAL ............. ............ %~~IG~~ ............ ............. ~~fJ~f~?~< Hk~<~ MT. PLEASANT PLANNED 40,000 ............. >ii~G:~ ............ '~~Ifl> PARK BALL FIELD ACTUAL ::1A~G~~ >`:€~lf(C~~ <`~#0~%? ?<1:1~fs~; STONEBRIDGE PK PLANNED 25 000 ~I~Lfr:: :::£t~G: :>:~t~:: <~ :z:GL1N.; . <~ GON< ............. RESTROOM UTIL. ACTUAL BYRD SCHOOL PLANNED 60 000 LIGHT BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL N64,840 ~i~€'.€'. :G~N':~ ''>'~4~#:: ~~G~i!Mz WHISPERING PLANNED 31 000 PINES PK. - BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL 1 928 1?~Cs':~ ~>1"~G<# ~~1~Cr €€€~1~IG TOTAL PLANNED 281 000 ACTUAL 66,768 COMMENTS: Lighting - The contracts for lights at the Career Center, Byrd Baseball Field and Starkey have been awarded. The poles have been received and the lights are being installed at the Byrd Baseball Field. Vinyard Park -The engineering for the baseball fields, parking and related facilities at this site have been submitted for review and are being forwarded to the City and County Engineering offices for comment and approval. Construction should occur during the winter of 1994. 10 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104207, 104211, 104206, 104213, 104202 ~-~ N = tNl.Ul9tsCKCU txr~naca TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP WHISPERING PLANNED 60,000 '.€'.1r1~:: ~:~:~1'[6~~ 1~~~1'' ~:~~f'QN.. «G~FI< ..... PINES - LIGHT BALLFIELD ACTUAL WHISPERING PLANNED 25,000 PINES - RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL 3~~~ ~H WHISPERING PLANNED 36 000 ::: PINES -TENNIS/ BASKETBALL CT ACTUAL ~~NF.j:: <~1~~ ~#F~~ _'1cllE`t.:: GREEN HILL PK PLANNED 30 000 :>:::Ei~G?% ?>:~1ilG'.€<'. %~i~~~k»> €'.€'.€:0()[i... ... 2 PICNIC SHELTERS ACTUAL N21 316 GOfi> ~~QN% >;~pN~~ ~~f~N< GARST MILL PK PLANNED 124,000 LIGHT 2 BALL FIELDS ACTUAL :>B:~f~<~'. €<€':H~f3<'.€'. WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 50 000 AREA PURCHASE LAND ACTUAL WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62 000 ~ENG BE AREA - 2 BALL FIELDS ACTUAL STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62 000 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED 449 000 ACTUAL 21,316 COMMENTS: Whispering Pines Park - The engineering work has been completed and has been submitted to the County's Engineering staff in late November or early December. This work includes a new baseball field, combination basketball/tennis court, and a study on the feasibility of restrooms at this site. 11 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104202, 104214, 104218, 104220, 104219 o-~ N = tNI.UMtSt KtU t7lYCNJCJ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP STARKEY PARK PLANNED 31 000 >~i~G` ~# 1 BASEBALL FIELD ACTUAL 67 995 €~k~ ~i~G' ~~1~G`': STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62,000 LIGHT 1 FIELD ACTUAL N43,245 CAN€~ ~~G€ ``f~~ ~(fi€€ STARKEY PARK PLANNED 25 000 :::>::::>::::>::::>:: ~1~G ::::>:::<::>::<:>::: ~~~EE`r<?: :::>::::>::::>::::>:: ~~~f >::::::::>::>::> ~t~l;: :: ......... >~ttl1< . . RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL ~>£1~> TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210 400 €€1r1~ RENOVATIONS ACTUAL 1 000 <€~?rR's>< ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ '<~tEG': ALL FIELD LANNED 2 000 ............ ............. ............ ............. ............ <:f1:)f(G:~ ............. ............ ............. ............ ............. ~1~##~~~ FENCING ACTUAL >8':#il'< 1##1a« ~`:€6#~> '£~1fi« FACILITY PLANNED 41,000 REPAIRS CRAIG AVENUE ACTUAL 38 791 ;~~> ~~> :.. ......:...... ............. ~< ........::::. `G><> .:::::::::::: ~>> :::::::._:::. ?> ''T> >:. ~:::::::::::: ~>>€ ::::::::::::. €<~1'z:`>~ ~:::::::::::: FACILITY PLANNED 11 000 REPAIRS LEISURE ARTS ACTUAL H ~ ~ ...... >>sFl ............ f3~>~~> ............. > ~«<? ...1,....... <'>#!`:<><< ............. FACILITY PLANNED 4 500 REPAIRS NALROND OFC. ACTUAL 2 115 G<<`' f3 il ?#?>E>< E` ~~>>. 'T<':~'%~ '.~~>>~` ~1'.><>> TOTAL PLANNED 446 900 ACTUAL 153 146 COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations -The consultant has completed the study and prepared the specifications to allow the repairs to the various facilities. Ball Field Fencing -Technical specifications have been prepared and the inventory of fencing needs has been established. The bid has been awarded and now the schedule is being prioritized. 12 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAIBLISS ACCOl111T CODE: 104221, 104216, 104217, 104208 N = tNI.UNCCKCU txr~na~a TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP I ADA ACCESS I GROUND COVER FOR PLAY- GROUND E(JUIP. INFIELD SURF. MATERIALS FOR i BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL N22 255 PLANNED 54,000 ACTUAL ~ 37,625 CAREER CENTER PLANNED 60 000 REPLACE LIGHTS ACTUAL N55,008 TOTAL PLANNED 171,000 ACTUAL ~ 114,888 COMMENTS: Infield surface materials have been purchased and are being spread. Ground cover materials for use around play apparatus has been bid and will be installed by County staff. 13 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 ROAD PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 500,000 E 500,000.00 E 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: ARNOLD COVEY ACCOUNT CODE: 104070 o-b TASK VDOT PLANNED ADVERTISES ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS PLANNED CONTRACT ON ALL PROJECTS ACTUAL (57) ALL PROJECTS PLANNED CONSTRUCTED & COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: All plant mix projects completed except Sierra Drive which will be completed this coming spring (1994). Incidental projects (4 projects) -Deed preparation has been completed for Ridgelea Road. Documents have yet to be signed by property owners. VDOT is working on the deed preparation on Willow Branch Road, Eveningwood Lane and Cove Road. VDOT plans to begin construction on all projects this coming spring. 14 ~~~~ ~ o ~~~g [-~ 6R N ~ ~ ~ o N , .~ 6i9 ~ '~ O O 0~0 0~0 ~q W 69 69 dQ 8 g ~.~ N N ~"' r M M M M ~ ~ Ci O 64 O 69 O a ~ b~'° ~ ~' ~ i a4 v~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ o F ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~~~ a„ a ~ ~ a ~~ a on b ~~ U ~ ~ ~ " C vi0 0 0 ~ ~O C~ U ' ,~_ G- W ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~A~~ on a ~ ~ b•~.~~ ~~.~,~ r~r~w> ~a V1 '~ Iti O O ~ a AW ~ ~ O O ~~ a~+ hr ~ a' ~ B A ~ v LL W OI OD Y lLp O. v (~-b BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 750,000 S 285,957.00 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BRIAN T. D1111CAN ACCOl111T CODE: o ~e TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MASTER PLAN PLANNED ACTUAL LAND PLANNED ACQUISITION/ EXCHANGE ACTUAL DETAIL PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ACCESS REQUEST ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED BIDS ACTUAL T ROAD STAR NNED PL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT> is bidding this project on February 15, 1994. The winning contractor will begin work on or about May 1. All water and sewer line extension work will have to be completed before VDOT's contractor can begin work. The Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development is working with the Department of Economic Development as well as the Utility Department to determine which water and sewer lines are eligible for funding under the Cgmiunity Development Block Grant. Once this is determined, Roanoke County will bid the water and sewer work as one or two separate projects. To be included in the eligible water and sewer line bid package will be a request for bids related to the 4.5 acre stormwater management facility. Additionally, a grading plan is being prepared and bids will be requested for that aspect of the project within the next month. Appalachian Power Company and Roanoke Gas are both ready to extend services. Roanoke Gas has determined that they will charge the County 556,000 to extend their gas line to the developable portion of the park. Roanoke County will be eligible to receive a rebate of this amount over the next 3 years from any Roanoke Gas customer hooking up to the 1.5 mile extension. APCO does not expect to receive payment from Roanoke County for extending their service. 15 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 BUDGET S 184,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: RON EDWRDS FIRE HYDRANTS CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE J. P. Turner S 156,687.69 ACCOUNT CODE: ,~-b TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY' JUN JUL AUG SEP INSTALLATION PLANNED ACTUAL FINAL INSP., PLANNED ACCEPTANCE & PROJECT ACTUAL COMPLETION TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: This project has been put on hold until spring. Through the end of November, 52 of the 71 Listed hydrants have been installed in the County. Due to the increase in materials costs, new DO7 requirements and other unexpected expenditures this project will not meet the goal anticipated. When the weather is suitable, probably in April, some additional hydrants will be installed according to the priority list with the remaining appropriated funds. 16 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 22, 1994 PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 750,000 E 240,121.01 PROJECT COORDINATORS: JOHN CHAMBLISS AID NOlER DUFF ACCOUNT CODE: 155140 a~ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PURCHASE OF PLANNED 750 000 LAND ACTUAL 240 121 TOTAL PLANNED 750 000 ACTUAL 240,121 COMMENTS: 17 .~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER y °"` AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Tuesday, February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: Mr. Hubbard will not be able to make a presentation at this meeting. However, he has agreed to attend the March 22 meeting and present an update on progress at the Smith Gap Landfill. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a status report that was presented to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. This status report gives an update on all phases of the project. Respectfully submitted: ~~~ ohn R. Hu bard Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Valley Resource Authority ----------------------- y~---------------- Edd Approved ( ) Motion b No Yes Abs Denied ( ) y Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke to Minnix Nickens o~~ ..:::::::: :.........................:...:..:::.:.:::::::.:.:.:.:.::::::........::::::::.:::.::.:.:.::.:::::.::.::.:.:::...:.:....::...}.:..}. {:.}.:.:.}::.: }..::.:}...::.. .:.ti {{.:::.: \h •tx {' •\:: • ...4 .. •.4 {.:. w} ::•::.:t. •..,...:•..:.: ,:• :x:..:. •:,{•. }.w ~ • '• {iL. ~}.:4.4.4ihh•: ~,.::.. +~•. : w~'ti ~ ...;i. •~;;~;.: {`.. ~i: $$: -:: •.::ii:: \ ]v C:\4\, \~M\\\.}: <.\.'C~\..:.}. :\::?x:: };..v4\n v ..\\~4~ : ~:fr v.'3....~.::ar\::.\. •.~::.\.:...:.'•?..,,. w:'~.~\`:^4,.w4\.'~••. \.,.5.: :.....:::. ....: } 4C: i44• ; :::::.4::.++.:. dt4.::. '~`@ .:\• x. °,~x: 4 ~ h4 4. ~,'.4 :,.:... ,.;,...: {.. F.:}.: •: t•...`a:.:..n:}r{.`:. .~Y t,..: ~~.•.{:•>} ~}`.:{\ , ~. ::: n:\4~;.. ~:.'~:i'f{:i{•k;:}'•v.'\ 4.v:4' `~~h.tii\ ..}h; \.ti:.}x• H~\'}'.4.`;}~~ii..;\;iii}}:i:h} v h• •. 'i} ;++~{{ •. ~~ .:~Yti•'fy ~: • ,y. { ' ~t~iti{••+ . v •' • {:~ ' `;:}`.:. r.:t ski ' 4•'~~`~}..{{. •J.:},':F,: ~ 4 ^' {; ::: ~ :i .}~ ~. '. v' + ' 1. :Q: : :;{•{.1. {. 'i:~:~' ~'•.:: ~'.~v44•: •.:~.RI• k.,`i\ v.~C,v.}:{v}:•:~' +IE'. ::: w V :v...ri{v': •4 ': `. vG.: ,4C}v, :.5 .\:>~:x:;c:}... fi \'~ieA." .~\'\~Oe;~s;' .' •~~33`s~, `:x:x;,;< ;:4:. ;.:x:zc••;;..ce:;}4.`'~••<• • ~.M1 to,.4,F\^Atz<fih }9, :42?..: r w},o: 5:::.\......:.. i\^S'k.........; ~b}`..~\....:....: .; ..4...:...:.,..:, r.\.}{• :.tia ~a\:`,\.,.:.:. }r::.~..xx~•~ .+J•,: ~M1 \~\ ^R . . \\ 4: 4 ~4'::1.•,, ';•5t~:x„y}:4. • .}Sk.. ~ h.:. 4~}tN;}}: : •: :\.~v::•x rt : • {:• k~{ :'S{•}4 x•:xt;{}}; 4v..ti ~', .: ,\ i' V \ •h•. h{•. 1. :\'{: ; •' :{• .:3 ~ 3fi.: :'ti ~ }:,+:•x•.,}}:ow\w::::4Yr}.\r.4~ `?:::}~•`-;x::•{:{::. ~ : \.\\4ti.' ;w}~:{h~•; .A.:,,• ;r.T• . ' :4 ~d. 4°a,:;•: ~. ~"}i.:`•.r':+4xk:::::;w`: `• k`{:}~ii':`.}::i{.a^4~:•4 ~,.:..~. ~.n:'4 'rh4~{:•:}'.6 ~•.t4 •.•:4}~..~.~.Yr}{: ..; ~.,i.v.,.'+',.~~~^}` ' :ti:£Y+.. it p: \ +'~+. cY. , }.~{:.;w}:::,•.;x'{}~x 3 „j:. :hn w.:+ 4... Y} •:,:x:. :~ ~, :{.{. ~.\}•{{•.:}}:.}••\'~L•,xe:`~ ~' •'`~'. ~~\!o :~• \44~t:\~.•.:•.\\'•~x:i~;••';i?`t;,\ ~>}s,;:.}•:¢.w2,r,',o\\•,:4,h~•x*.•,}, •t.4:+%0}~` i>. .} \'c"c:4~:' :;; .;:~~\sY•::i::Ya~•t4•~•`•'f .';CY.Z~ +~, • l;. •• •.4y44\1~wi44:.$.},r`•~4•k •w.. ~ '• ;C{•. "':C~}ii~` :•xkc}..• \t' 4 ,7~ ti • ~.~''ij~t~ ~;,' yy : ..i~•}.\•:;:::,.•:44. •.•:w,;::.: \i \ .\\\\4, • x•}Y}\\<i4:'i.?:.\x+\''•o-\~}:{.: xt.~ ~:.:\w:.};?`K•,:.;%4..•,.;xax•:~•• b• \~•'x+.~~':;, ~L" L4 :, •,~` ., ~~. .; {; ';`i~. •{:{{k.{S:ii>{, C~i•:`•:.}; •`a, 4• h x,J. a~~~.44wi.;; } ,\.. , . 4::•:.::..;,,.1~.: . }:::;. \.\: ~.x4,•`•` S ~ '. 4i.......:A.':5.:.: :v.\4..... ~\+4...\....n:.::....{h.:..4.::::: ixx{•}:•}::...... 4:~ `` ~ wx\~ii:~•; \:i{..\v: ~::::.::......~+•'.: i'4v. 4::..v+. ~~.•G.:ti\\:n,iv:iJ;{k M:ti•:{~ MEETING: January 20, 1994 PROJECT: Master Schedule STATUS: Progress has been slow during the month of December, due to the holidays and poor weather conditions. Winter work is anticipated to be slow. Below is a brief status of each portion of the project. Smith Gan: Little work has been accomplished, due to weather. The upper access road is near completion. Work is being concentrated on completing the diversion ditch work. Completion is dependent on weather. Tipper Station: Progress is being made on inside work, however, weather has prevented progress on exterior work. Total completion is expected during February, weather permitting. Landfill Liner: Very little progress was made during December, due to weather. Work will concentrate on completing cell 7 & 6 in January, weather permitting. Utilities: Work has continued on the leachate tank, which is approximately 95 % complete. Remaining pump station work is being delayed by weather. Completion is expected by end of January, weather permitting. Water Well Supply: Tfie water supply is complete with one well yielding 9 gallons per minute. The additional two wells are unusable. It is anticipated that an additional well will be needed in the future. Gas Monitorin Wells: D-7 Plans and specifications are complete. A phased implementation is being planned for installation after landfill construction is complete. Paving: Paving will be delayed until Spring. Transfer Station: Work continues on minor items and corrections. Contractor has been requested to improve progress. No occupancy date has been given. Rail Transportation: Rail Spur: Complete with minor items remaining. Rail Cars: Complete. ui ment: Equipment is ready for delivery upon request. Attached is a summary of the project schedule and status. Respectfully submitted: <~ ~ j~~` John R. ubbard, P. . Chief Executive Officer PROJECT STATUS ROANOKE VALIEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY !~ MASTER SCHEDULE SCHEDULE 1992 1993 cX, J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D C WORK ITEMS A E A P A U U U E C 0 E A E A P A U U U E C O E N B R R Y N L G P T V C N B R R Y N L G P T V C 0 M U R C I E Y U T O E E U R C I E Y U T 0 E E P A U H L S E B M M A U H L S E B M M L R A T M E B B R A T M E B B E Y R B R E E Y R B R E E T Y E R R Y E R R E R R LANDFILL Pa rt B A ro val PP C O ~~ .. :: L :.. :: ~.:; ::~::. ::1=::, .: ~:.;.:.. .;:.:::.:: ;:.;;:.;:: .:_:.::::: :.:.:.:.;;:. .:;:.::.:. 00 Rou h Gr ' adin 9 9 7 Monitoring Wells C O M P L E ':~~'E~ ........ ?:`:`')_z~` ......... 100 Bui ' Idin 9 5 Lin ers 70 U"' tihties 80 TRANSFER STATION Part A Approval C O M P L E T E 100 Part B Submittal C O M P L E T E 100 Part B Approval C O M P L E T E 100 Site Clearing C O M P L %'~`~`~ T~:`3 ~'~~? 100 Buildi n 9 ........ ...... .__...: ::.:,.: ...... .,..,,. ...:.... ....... .. ..... ....... .....: :.:,,, 9 RAIL TRANSPORT ''ransfer 6,297,614 S 5,195,223 82°i6 Transportation 9,000,000 -0- 0°,6 ' TOTAL 527,343,818 S 12,303,309 45°,6 Item No. ~ "' 8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: 1993 Economic Activity Report COUNTY ADMINIBTRATOR~B COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The 1993 Economic Activity Report was prepared to present an overview of economic development activities in Roanoke County. Business development inquiries were tracked and analyzed by origin of geographic region and source. Prospect leads were analyzed and locations/expansions noted. An accounting of commercial and industrial building activity showed a square footage increase. County programs for the Industrial Development Authority, business retention, and public private partnerships are described. Roanoke County's top economic development projects; Valley TechPark and Explore are reviewed and highlights presented. An outlook for project priorities during 1994 is presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors review the report and receive and file. Respectfully submitted: Approved: ~~ ,~~~ ~ / ~~` ~~~~"., " ~ ~. fir/ Tim thy W. ubala, Director Elmer C. H dge Economic Development Department County Admini trator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment D -~ g 1993 Economic Development Activity Report FL~AN~~ O~ ~ F . ~, ~ 0- ~1 ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ` ~2 J ~ 1838 Roanoke County Department of Economic Development February 18, 1994 D~8 I. Introduction The success of Roanoke County's Economic Development Program is dependent upon the concept of partnerships. The year 1993 saw Roanoke County emphasize product development by concentrating on partnerships to develop Valley TechPark and participating as a partner with private sector efforts to develop sites and building projects and ensure that a location or expansion occurred. Roanoke County's participation with funding support ensures that regional agencies represent the Roanoke Valley positively to people from outside the area. These people are visitors to the Valley initially but may eventually locate or expand their business here. Roanoke County's relationship with neighboring and adjacent localities has provided opportunities for partnerships for action to attract new business to the Roanoke Valley. The Hanover Direct location provides an excellent example of the proven success of partnerships between the County and the business sector, the Regional Partnership, and a private landowner. Tourism partnerships were formed to help bring the Amos Alonza Stagg Bowl to Salem and to establish an area-wide sports marketing effort that will bring other sporting events to the Roanoke Valley. Internally, County departments worked together to promote and host several special events that had regional prominence. The Second Annual Civil War Re-enactment, Native American Pow Wow and Roanoke Symphony Polo. The year 1993 was an excellent year for expanding partnerships. Development of the partnerships concept will continue in 1994 and beyond. D-g II. Economic Development Highlights--1993 Valley TechPark moved forward with the completion of plans and a commitment from the .Virginia Department of Transportation to construct the industrial access road. Roanoke County obtained $1,230,000 in funds from the state of Virginia to "leverage" its $750,000 bond funds for the site development of Valley TechPark. Four (4) new business locations and nine (9) expansions of existing business and industries will create an estimated $25 million in new development that will create or retain 865 jobs in Roanoke County. Virginia's Explore Park development was enhanced by Roanoke County support of a $700,000 secondary road improvement project to improve Rutrough Road and provide temporary access to Explore from the Blue Ridge Parkway. Approval of a Roanoke County Charter amendment by the Virginia General Assembly provided a source of funds for "tourism and tourism related" projects in Roanoke County. This action increased the transient occupancy tax from 2% to 5~ and dedicated this increase (approximately $300,000) to fund various destination attractions and tourism projects in the Roanoke Valley. III. Selling Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley The economic development staff continually seeks to identify creative ways to "sell" Roanoke County as a business location and tourism destination. Roanoke County relies on the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership to perform marketing trips out of the area. During 1993, County staff were instrumental in the formation of the "Heart of Virginia" organization. This is a joint effort of the regional economic development organizations in Roanoke, Lynchburg, Danville, and Pittsylvania to participate in selected trade shows in the United States. This area will be promoted by a joint marketing effort that involves a trade show booth and sharing of prospect leads. Roanoke County placed ads in selected local and regional publications such as the Blue Ridge Regional Business Journal and the Roanoke Valley Visitors and Newcomer Guide to present a balanced message supporting tourism and industrial development. 2 D-8 IV. Business Development The Roanoke County Department of Economic Development worked closely with the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, Virginia Department of Economic Development, real estate consultants, developers and agents, local citizens and businesses to meet the needs of business and industry interested in Roanoke County. Although a majority of the companies are classified as small business, some major corporations and Fortune 500 companies have visited the Roanoke Valley as prospects. Local and regional business provided the majority of inquiries (59~) that Roanoke County dealt with during the year. Other areas of Virginia, and neighboring Maryland and West Virginia, provided fourteen (14) leads or ten percent (10~) of the total 138 inquiries. The south and northeast regions of the United States provided another 15~ of the inquiries. (See Table 1) Roanoke County staff initially generated or handled 82 (59.9) of 138 inquiries. Professional real estate consultants and/or local developers provided 19 leads of 21~ of the total. The Virginia Department of Economic Development usually worked with the Partnership as the origin of prospect visits to the Roanoke County area. Together, the state and Economic Development Partnership provided 26 inquiries to the County. By the end of 1993, 66 of the 138 inquiries could be classified as prospects in that a visit was made to Roanoke County or County staff visited them at their location. Of those companies, twelve (12) or 18$ made a location/ expansion decision in Roanoke County. Another eighteen (18) prospects that County staff worked with located elsewhere in the Roanoke Valley. Twelve (12) inquiries were transferred as active projects into 1994 for follow up during the year. Table 2 indicates that 90 inquiries (66~) did not materialize. Of the 18 prospects that located elsewhere in the Roanoke Valley, 12 were searching for an existing building. Building vacancies are limited in Roanoke County and provide an opportunity area for new investment. A continuing analysis of inquiries and prospects over the past five years shows that one-half of all inquiries are from outside the Roanoke Valley. (Table 3) The percentage of out- of-area prospects (31~) and prospect locations has increased over the previous two years. Details of Roanoke County's described in Table 4. locations and expansions are 3 ~'~ TABLE 1 Economic Development Activity Report January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993 Geographic-Organizational Origin of Inquiries and Prospects Total Inquiries 138* Total prospects 66** Geographic Origin of Inquiries and Prospects Area Local-Regional VA/DC/MD WVA Unknown South Northeast West Other states NY/NJ/PA/DE Great Lakes Mid-West Europe Percentacte 59.4% 10.1% 3.0% 8.7% 1.5% 5.1% 0.7% 5.1% 1.5% 5.1% 1.5% Organizational origin of Inquiries and Prospects Organization State Partnership Realtors/Developers Railroad/Utility Other governments County Total 12 14 29 0 1 82 138 *Inquiries are those companies who contact this office through a variety of ways. (This is the first step.) **Prospects are those companies that have gone beyond inquiry status. This office has either visited the prospects present facility or the prospect has visited available sites and/or buildings in the Roanoke Valley. 4 0.8 TABLE 2 Economic Development Activity Report January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993 End-of-Year Status Transferred to 1993 - Active 12 Transferred to 1993 - Inactive 5 Project terminated - Dead 90 Located elsewhere 18 Location/expansion/assisted 13 Total 138 5 ~~~ TABLE 3 Economic Development Activity Report Comparative data 1989 - 1993 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Total Inquiries 59 265 281 147 138 % of out-of-area 42% 80% 82% 48% 51% Total prospects 26 65 57 78 66% % of out-of-area 26% 46% 24% 24% 31% Locations 9 11 9 10 12 # from out-of--area 3 3 3 2 4 # local expansions N/A N/A N/A 12 8 Staff assisted with public-private partnership funds or as an ombudsman 6 o-~ TABLE 4 1993 Locations/Expansions in Roanoke County Number Square Existing/new Projected Company name Companv type employees Foota a business Oocupancydate First Union* Financial 200+ N/A E 1993 to 1995 Bank of Floyd Financial 6 4,200 E May 1993 Hampton Inn* Hotel 25 28,571 E March 1994 U.S. Forest Service* Fed. Government 125 27,000 N October 1993 Noble-Met Manufacturing N/A 4,000 E July 1993 Forensics Lab State Government 30 51,600 N October 1994 Applebee's Restaurant 65 3,800 E October 1993 Burger King Restaurant 35 1,878 N September 1993 Hanover Direct* Distribution 276 500,000 N October 1994 Mike Sloan Restaurant 50 N/A E Late 1994 Dye-Com Manufacturing 3 2,000 E August 1993 Progressive Products* Contractor 50 7,600 E October 1993 *Used public-private partnership funds from Roanoke County 7 V. Product Development p • 8` The adoption of the new Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance on December 31, 1992, resulted in an increase of acreage zoned commercial and industrial. Staff estimates that 2,405 acres of commercial zoned land and 2,767 acres of industrial land comprise the available inventory of land in these zoning categories. During 1993, the staff developed a comprehensive file of available commercial and industrial sites. The County's efforts over the past five years have been to increase the number of sites that are considered "ready to go." This category of sites has the proper zoning, road access, available water and sewer and is considered for sale or lease. At the present time, Roanoke County is seeking to develop the 178+ acre Valley TechPark industrial site (see Section X) to provide a publicly owned industrial site for high technological companies seeking to relocate or expand in the Roanoke Valley. Another initiative that contributed to product development is Roanoke County's public-private partnership policy. The policy was amended during the year to include any type of business or industrial project meeting policy criteria, including tourism projects. The County's participation is normally 50~ of the public costs; based on such factors as new jobs, investment and new taxes. Four projects were funded during the year through this policy for a public investment of $105,000 resulting in approximately $4.5 million in private investment. The County's available building inventory includes several industrial buildings: a 40,000 square foot facility in Vinton, a 50,000 square foot operations center, a 27,000 square foot building, and smaller buildings in the 5,000 square foot range. There are a number of commercial buildings less than 3,000 square feet available in the north County area along Peters Creek Road. Office space vacancies are tracked to provide information for large out-of-area office users that may be interested in the Roanoke market. Coordination with area commercial and industrial realtors provide up-to-date information on vacant office space available for lease. VI. Industrial, Office, and Commercial Construction New construction is a visible sign of an active economy. The year 1993 showed an increase in the scale of construction and an end to a downward spiral of projects since 1989. The 31 projects "tracked" in the County's development review process show an increase over 1992 (see Table 5). Two-thirds (21) of the projects had been completed by the end of the calendar year. 8 V-~ Also, during 1993, office and commercial projects showed an increase (in square footage) over the previous year. Industrial projects declined in square footage totals. The majority of all projects could be classified as small business. New projects outnumbered expansions 25 to 6. Total estimated value of all new commercial and industrial construction is $7,895,400 million. Generally, projects occurred in either the northern or southern sections of Roanoke County. There were few projects in the Vinton and west County areas. Table 6 indicates that office projects had the largest square footage total over the previous five year period. Industrial projects were second in square footage, but have declined during the past two years. Commercial projects seem to have fluctuated in total square footage from year to year representing only about a third as much total square footage as office and industrial projects over the past five years. 9 .~ Industrial Soft, Planned VA Construction Supply 23,421 Storage Bins 5,000 Under construction None Comnleted 1993 RCI" 2,400 Ronk Cabinet Shop 7,500 Plastics OneA 15,000 Crozier Building 2,880 Subtotal 6 @ 56,201 AAddition/expansions TABLE 5 Commercial and Industrial Projects (January -December 1993) Office/medical ~. ft. None Forensics Lab 51,600 Cox Cable 27,200 Lauroc Office II" 4,500 Dean Witter 7,717 F&W 51,259 Woods Office 1,650 Advance Chiropractic 4,000 Dr. Davis 2,700 Carilion 14,432 Dr. Williams Izeltuay 1,300 U.S. Forestry 27,000 11 @ 193,858 Total 31 projects 378,889 Retail/commercial Sg. ft. Richfield-laundry 4,962 Leeds Music 7,280 Hampton Inn 20,571 National Optical 4,000 Golf Learning Center 1,700 Rally's 800 Burger King 1,878 Applebee's 3,800 Country Bear^ 2,000 Monroe Muffler 4,466 Longhorn Steakhouse 5,373 Valley Motorsport 7,000 Advance Auto 7,000 Richfield Retirement 46,000 14 @ 128,830 10 p•8 Table 6 5-Year Comparison Industrial and Office and Commercial Projects 198 9-1993 Industrial Office Commercial Total 1989 337,513 615,738 93,260 1,046,511 1990 501,555 288,102 52,313 841,970 1991 253,138 234,955 74,168 562,261 1992 87,380 138,993 71,120 297,403 1993 56,201 206,825 128,830 387,856 Totals 1,235,787 1,484,613 415,691 3,135,001 *Project included in the County's development process are in a stage of plan review, construction or completion. Source: Roanoke County Department of Economic Development, Annual Activity Reports: 1989 through 1992 11 dB VII. Existing Business and Industry Retention Activities The County's existing business and industry retention program is an integral part of the economic development. National statistics indicate that between 50-75~ of all our jobs come from expansions of local business and industry. New businesses in the County receive a letter of welcome from the County Administrator shortly after a new business license is issued by the Commissioner of the Revenue. Executive calls to the chief executive officers or managers of County businesses allow for an interchange of information about the company's status and plans as well as satisfaction with local government services. Opportunities for assistance and/or expansion are determined. The County's information data base to assist business is augmented by access to other resources of the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC), Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership and Fifth Planning District Commission (FPDC). The visitation program allows the County staff to understand the company's needs and identify a program or resource and determine an action to address the business' concern. The Department of Economic Development coordinates a recognition program to recognize business expansions and locations within the County. The County participates in the celebration of a project announcement, grand opening or ribbon cutting and presents a certificate of appreciation, when appropriate. During 1993, the County staff answered 15 requests for retention assistance. Specific areas of assistance included: 3 research/referral 5 development review/rezoning/permitting 2 signage 3 water/sewer information/assistance 2 taxation A number of County tourism related businesses--hotels, restaurants, and retail were visited as part of the visitation program prescribed under the Convention and Visitors Bureau's Tourism Accreditation effort. These visits and contacts provided a greater insight into the tourism business in Roanoke County. 12 d' $ VIII. Overview of Activities of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County. The Authority was active during 1993 in the following areas: • Approved the issuance of $4,750,000 of lease revenue bonds for the acquisition, equipping, and lease of the former Travelers Building as a County Administration Center. Roanoke County leased the building to the IDA who leases it back to the Board of Supervisors. The bond funds also allowed the County to renovate the former administration building and the School Administration Building. • Approved the acquisition of two parcels of real estate to improve the industrial access route into Valley TechPark. The Authority has been monitoring development activities at the industrial park. • Reviewed and approved a set of restrictive covenants for Valley TechPark. • Reviewed and approved a real estate commission policy for Valley TechPark. • Approved the acquisition of fifteen (15) acres of land from Friendship Manor Apartment Corporation on Hollins Road and the acquisition of fifteen (15) acres in the Jack C. Smith Industrial Park for the benefit and future use of Hanover Direct. Funds were provided by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The Authority has been actively involved in the preparation of the Performance Agreement and real estate transactions for this industry location. • Approved the refunding of a $3,500,000 bond for C & B Associates for the refinancing of Tanglewood Holiday Inn. IX. A Regional Perspective Roanoke County is a participating member in two regional organizations that are involved in different aspects of economic development; or, business recruitment and tourism recruitment. The Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership markets the Roanoke Valley in out-of-area prospects and serves as the Valley's initial contact to coordinate prospect inquiries and visits. The Partnership staff coordinates closely with the marketing representatives of the Virginia Department of Economic Development to match the Valley's resources with prospect needs. County staff members work closely with the Partnership staff. The County Administrator serves on the Executive Committee and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors serves on the Board of Directors. County staff members are in daily contact with the 13 D-8 Partnership staff assisting with requests for data, prospect visits and marketing trips. The Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) seeks to attract conventions and tourists to the Roanoke Valley. County economic staff have assisted the CVB staff with the Virginia's Tourism Accreditation Program by preparing the Tourism Situation Analysis report. The Director of Economic Development and County Administrator serve on the Board of Directors. Other economic development staff members have served on CVB subcommittees. The Valley's regional perspective has been strengthened by County participation in regional projects. The CVB's Sports Committee has been successful in attracting national sports events to the Roanoke Valley. The NCAA Division III Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl was held in Salem in December 1993. During May 1994, the Tour DuPont bicycle race will come through the Valley. A proposal has been made to host team training for the 1996 Olympics. The Valley's facilities have been inventoried and a proposal fashioned to meet the specific training needs of several sports. Hopefully, teams from Roanoke's Sister City/ Countries will be enticed to train here. Roanoke County continues to support Virginia Amateur Sports to host the Commonwealth Games which brought over 7,000 athletes t~ the Roanoke Valley in June 1993. X. Valley TechPark County Economic Development staff are involved in the site development of Valley TechPark to bring this site into a "ready- to-go" status. During 1993, the following highlights occurred at Valley TechPark. Completion of site development plans and road and utility profiles. Approval was given by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for Roanoke County's application for $450,000 of Industrial Access Funds. Additionally, VDOT will provide up to $60,000 in excess revenue sharing funds to match County money to improve Route 11/460 at the entrance of Valley TechPark. Approval of up to $700,000 of Virginia Community Development Block Grant to assist in utility extensions, a road extension and site development costs. Acquisition of several out-parcels by the Roanoke County IDA to improve access to Route 11/460. 14 ~~ Planning and coordination with Appalachian Power Company, Roanoke Gas Company, and C&P Telephone Company to bring private utilities to the site. XI. Virginia's Explore Park Tourism continues to be one of Virginia's top two industries, bringing in over $8.6 billion in revenue in 1992. In the Roanoke Valley, total travel expenditures totalled $222.3 million in 1990, representing less than 3~ of the state's total of $8.1 billion in 1990. Roanoke County's travel expenditures and travel generated revenues continue to increase. Roanoke County travel expenditures increased from $46 million in 1988, to $50 million in 1989, and $53 million in 1990. Roanoke County is at the forefront of tourism in the Roanoke Valley and western Virginia with the Virginia's Explore Park opening in the summer 1994. A living history park, Virginia's Explore Park is strategically located at the intersection of the Roanoke River and the Blue Ridge Parkway, our nation's most heavily attended national park. To date, Explore Park has hosted over 9,000 students from the greater Roanoke Valley region. During 1993, the County has assisted the Park in several significant ways: Board of Supervisors approved $350,000 in matching funds for a $700,000 project to improve a 1.3 mile portion of Rutrough Road as a temporary public access to the Park from the Blue Ridge Parkway. This key step guaranteed that visitors will be able to reach the Park from the Parkway until the Blue Ridge Parkway Spur is completed in 1996. The County provided staff assistance to work with Virginia Department of Transportation to secure right-of-way donations for Rutrough Road improvements. Donations were granted from 15 private property owners, one church, three jurisdictions owning the landfill, and Explore Park. Board of Supervisors approved $100,000 for Virginia's Explore Park from the transient occupancy tax revenues: $50,000 for operations and $50, 000 for construction based on a 3 : l match. This leveraged an estimated $166,000 in construction for a 4,200 foot long internal road system committed in-kind by several private Roanoke Valley contractors. The internal road system is scheduled for completion in April of 1994. The Board's support of the Park also leveraged major capital gifts to the Park from private donors: 1) Beirne Carter Foundation in Richmond contributed $250,000 15 C~'~ for construction of the Houtz double-crib, bank barn (71' x 42') that will also serve as an interim entry pavilion and education center. 2) Horace Fralin Foundation underwrote $65,000 for reassembly of a pre-Civil War one-room schoolhouse originally located in Franklin County. The County provided staff support to the Park through the donation of the economic development specialist on an as needed basis until the Park's opening. The staff member has assisted in grantwriting, advertising and marketing, strategic planning, legislative affairs, and organization of the Park's opening. Through this effort a $5,000 advertising grant from the Division of Tourism was made for Explore with a $5,000 match from the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau to share an advertisement in the,"Virginia is for Lovers," Travel Guide (600,000 printed, visitors obtain by calling 1-800-VisitVA). • The County continues to be actively involved in related Park activities, i.e. Parkway Spur planning and coordination, coordination with the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, and management coordination through county departments. • The County has taken the lead in coordinating a Blue Ridge Parkway Focus Group, comprised of tourism and economic development leaders in the Roanoke Valley, focusing on tourism and Parkway concerns. To this end, Roanoke County's Department of Economic Development coordinated a study to learn more about Parkway travelers through the Roanoke Valley in October of 1993. A summary of the study is scheduled to go to the Board of Supervisors in March 1994. • The County continues to advocate and encourage a Parkway visitors center in the vicinity of Virginia's Explore Park. As indicated by the 1993 Parkway study, providing Parkway visitors with information that they need and want would be an economic boost for the entire Roanoke Valley. • The County's Citizen's Advisory Committee continues to meet, as needed, offering input to the Federal Highway planning process on the Parkway Spur Road. Without question, the County's support and assistance to Virginia's Explore Park has made a difference in its success and its continued progress toward a summer opening. The County's investment of $450,000 for road improvements and operations/ capital construction has been more than matched with $481,000 in additional construction funds. The true tourism benefits of the Park and its future economic impact and benefit to Roanoke County are not anticipated until the Park's opening. For most Parkway travelers, Virginia's Explore Park will be their first contact with western Virginia tourism and to the Roanoke Valley. Without lodging, restaurants, and other visitor facilities at the Park, visitors who visit the Park will be introduced to 16 o-s other area attractions and directed to other visitor facilities in the Roanoke Valley where they will be encouraged to stay and spend money. XII. Outlook for 1994 Staff activities for 1994 will continue to be guided by the goals of the 1992-94 Economic Development Strateay. Specific projects envisioned include: 1. Construction of public utilities and industrial access road in Valley TechPark. 2. Opening of Explore '94 in May 1994 with the completion of road improvements to Rutrough Road and a temporary access to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Continued coordination of the construction of the Parkway spur road to Explore and regional visitors center will be accomplished through the Explore Management Group. 3. Development of a vision plan for Roanoke County should guide its future economic development. Staff will participate with the Planning Department and Planning Commission to complete this project. 4. Job creation and job retention activities will continue through the refinement of existing relationships with the Regional Partnerships, Roanoke County IDA, other area governments, the real estate community and County staff. 17 . RECYCLE UPDATE ~ " ~' REPORT TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County of Roanoke February 22, 1994 1. Where does Roanoke County's recycling program stand? PARTICIPATION: The first collection of Curbside Source Separated recyclables in the Commonwealth of Virginia began in Roanoke County in October, 1987. Currently, the County is providing curbside recycle collection for some 3,700 residents: a. 1,700 automated "Commingled" residents, 89% participation on a monthly basis. b. 2,000 manual "Source Separated" residents 45.50% participation on a twice-monthly basis. (80 - 85% measured monthly) The percentage participation is calculated on the number of residents setting materials out to be collected. In the twice monthly area, on average 80-85% of the participants set materials out at least once a month. Since August 1989, the Kroger drop-off station at Cave Spring Corners has provided an additional recycling source for Valley residents and is included in the diversion statistics for the County. There are other drop-off sites in the Valley, but tonnages outside the County are not counted as part of the County diversion rate. DIVERSION RATE: The County is now at a 20% diversion rate based on the 1991 report to the Department of Waste Management. Of that diversion rate 7% is yard waste, 4% is residential material and commercial recyclable materials constitutes the remaining 89%. The County is to be at 25% diversion by the end of 1995. Staff is in the process of gathering data for the 1993 report due by May 1, 1994. For the 1991 reporting period the diversion rates for surrounding localities were as follows; Roanoke City 15%, the Town of Vinton 39% and the City of Salem 12%. According to the Department of Environmental Quality failure to meet these recycling mandates can result in a Class I Misdemeanor and/or a Civil penalty with a possible fine of up to $50,000 per day. ~~ A current issue concerning staff is the recycle truck. It is a locally fabricated 1976 vehicle with very high mileage. It frequently breaks down and is worth less than $2,000.00. Staff has delayed its replacement since cost comparisons, as shown in this report, do not support Source Separation as the County-wide form of door-to-door recycle collection. However, a decision regarding vehicle replacement will be required in the near future because of the continued deterioration of this old truck. 2. Will the County make its 1995 target of 25% diversion or should the County try to get the mandates changed? The Approved County Solid Waste Plan states that we will attain the 25% diversion by end of 1995 with increased yard waste diversion accountability, increased residential participation, and increased commercial material accountability. Staff feels that we can make the 25% target. Things the County needs to do: a. Work to prevent any increase in the mandated diversion level beyond 25% in the near future. b. Press the legislators for new initiatives for waste stream minimization and improved availability of recycle material markets. c. Remind the legislators that mandates without funding, continue to be a problem. e. Work toward encouraging vendors participation in local marketing of recyclables. 3. Comparison of tons collected and costs of the various collection methods utilized in the County: TONS COST 91 92 93 91 92 93 Automated Commingle 297 264 299 $11,161 $11,602 $8,338 Source Separated 263 241 279 $25,610 $26,367 $23,395 Drop-offs 688 752 699 $25,706 $28,162 $26,178 4. How does Roanoke County get credit for the materials that are recycled at the various drop-off points? The drop-off points around the Valley are a cooperative effort between Kroger, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, Waste Management, and 2 Cycle Systems. Materials are collected by Waste Management vehicles and a~ / taken to Cycle Systems for processing. Roanoke County receives credit for those recyclables deposited in the drop-off point located at Cave Spring Corners. It is the only drop-off facility located within the boundaries of the County. The County received credit for 700 tons of material deposited at the Cave Spring drop-off point during FY 92-93. Drop-off containers cost up to $8,000 or more per month, depending upon the type (roll-off, trailer, etc.). All costs associated with drop-off are currently funded by the RVRA. These costs include: a. Reimbursement of Kroger for container rental. b. Payment to Waste Management for transport of materials. 5. What are the projected annual costs of the two methods of recycling, if implemented on a county-wide basis? SOURCE SEPARATED: 6 trucks @$80,000 (7 yr.life) $68,571 25,500 sets @ $18 (10 yr life) 45,900 PERSONNEL (6-2 MAN CREWS) 228,000 VEHICLE MAINT @ $20,000 PER 120,000 REVENUE (18,360) LANDFILL AVOIDANCE ($30 PER TON) (91,800) $ 352,311 Based upon 92-93 average of 240 lbs per house hold (3060 total tons), crew cost of $22,000 and $16,000, average revenue per ton of $6, and current tipping fee of $30. Twice monthly collection allows a reduction of one truck. Average daily participation rates increase with monthly collection which means more stops per day and more trips to processor. The average time for recycle discharge is 1/2 hrs per trip. Current collection route requires approximately two days per week to cover one route. AUTOMATED COMMINGLED: 2 trucks @ $120,000 (7 yr life) $34,286 25,500 carts @ $40 (10 yr life) 102,000 PERSONNEL (2 drivers @ $23,000 ea) 46,000 VEHICLE MAINT @ $30,000 PER 60,000 SORTING FEE ($10 PER TON) 39,650 LANDFILL AVOIDANCE ($30 PER TON) ( 118,950) $ 162,986 Based upon 92-93 average of 311 lbs per household (3,965 total tons), crew cost of $23,000 per driver and landfill avoidance fee based upon current tipping fee of $30. MAJOR FACTORS IN COST OF EACH PROGRAM: - Cost associated with container has decreased - Automated Carts are $10 less than in 1992 - Landfill Avoidance will continue to increase based on projected increases in the tipping fee. COST PER TON: $115 ANNUAL COST PER HOUSEHOLD: $13.80 COST PER TON: $41 ANNUAL COST PER HOUSEHOLD: $6.40 6. What are the recycle operating budgets for Roanoke City, Vinton and Salem and approximately how much material is recovered? Roanoke City - $300,000 for residential curbside collection of 16,000 homes. Approximately 1,300 tons were collected in 1993. Vinton - $130,000 budgeted for residential curbside collection of approximately 2,900 homes. 365 tons were collected in 1993. 3 ' ~ Salem - No distinct recycle budget. Approximately $3,000 included for /~ drop-off trailer. No curbside collection. Estimate that 5%-6% of waste Vr" stream is recovered at transfer station. Target scrap metal and cardboard. 7. How much do we currently pay for recyclables to be processed, and do we have contracts? The current cost to process recyclables is $10 per ton for commingled materials. Note that in the cost comparisons that the County receives some monetary benefit for certain source separated materials, market determined. When the original arrangements were made with Cycle Systems, they were the only vendor in the Valley willing to provide the service on a test basis. Since we were testing the process, no contract was developed. Before any expansion of existing curbside recycling or development of other collection processes, the vendor participation will be subject to competitive bidding. 8. What is the status of a regional approach to recycling? A regional approach to recycling has been discussed informally by members of the Resource Authority. The current priority is to get the transfer station and landfill facilities constructed and operational. A regional approach will then be considered. Regional recycling will allow for a greater volume and a stronger position in the marketplace. Larger volume lends to economy of scale and makes a material recovery at the transfer station or landfill feasible. A regional approach may not necessarily mean identical residential collection practices, but will be subject to individual membership approval. One single entity would be responsible for recycling in the Valley with a single diversion target. 9. What does staff recommend in terms of recycling for the County? In the Solid Waste Plan adopted by the Board in 1991, a commitment was made to offer the opportunity to recycle to all citizens. However, door-to- door recycle collection County-wide has proven to be expensive, leading staff to study alternative methods of collection, such as drop-offs and material recovery facilities. Staff recommends that recycling be pursued on a regional basis through the Resource Authority. No current expansion is recommended until the regional approach has been addressed. The staff will continue to pursue the regional approach and seek collection solutions that could support such an approach within the 94-95 fiscal year. 4 p - /D mmmo a nmm mrmm~n Q1 W M ~nm N M a nNr W N amen N O S min W a O M Wr O r a O W r M N a m N a W r tD a U] a N N N W p m W r N N r N M m r W I~ m ~ Qt ~ a Q S M M~ a m A .7 N W a a ~ M a O ~ o M O N O tD r N M m m r a c0 N O~ W m M a W ~ N W N a a N O m t(1 M A n a .- S O N M M O W Z a W O O O a a N r m M M O j N N ~^ N m M M r m m m `~ O '_ Z F N M M ~ ~ 2 ~ ? ~ m r m r M M r a N O1 B M W ' •- m M m M a M M a W N M N W o N W W N r o O ~ N N ~ N ~ a N O O ~ ~? a ~ W ~` ~ ~ ~? M ~ rj A r ~ w N a M ~ r a^ N N N '- W~ ~' z r 0 ' N N a M a N m o a ~ M o > W m W M m W M ~ a~ W r Qf m a N m r r O O N N m u1 ~ O N ~ a ,~ N ~ M N ~ 'L ~ h 2 r N N N ~ r M 41 m O ~ W W m r W O ~ m O U N N O a a N a a O O1 W O m M N a r N M a W W t[) N a 4l W O a M t0 O m a o N 1 W M M tO tD W P M M a 0 M a W N M e- O N f ~ N N N N W ~ W a m W N W m r T M ~ C v m r a W M ~ m M ~ N a m m W m N M m Ilf a M N O W m N M O W a a m~ ~tl m m M N M f", N r~ Q ti tp r tp r a O E M M M M M A W N r M ~~ N r M W O M M W a O' O W O 2 N M m W a M N o a a M N W r a W W `' O r N N N N m N N W a r W M t ~ M N ~ O V N In a r ~ ~ Yy V N In a m 0 ~ t ) O N N a 07 .- N W 7 ~ O N.- 000 m , r 4'~ m U N r W n m r a W o n W o M W N .-NOaa W a y '-~n . a n ~n aaW r N ~no~ W m a mMO ,rMin Maa ~ oin -~ r~MaN ~ z O j r .- r r N ~, ~ N M .- r M N Qt a r m O Ql . r 1 Q O U ~ ' - W m m 4f W m N W o W r O o F~ ~ O W W O W O W N S a r W M O ~ ~ O t7 N W N M m O N T N N O a u? . a N ~ a N a W ~ O a~ m' G 3 a s ~' W m H N N ~ r N m M A W M N r m r t4 m ~ O O .y aorna rNm o WM n Wm a Wa M W ~ r~N ~rro~° O a in 'nar° N o r m Z r W r C r N N N W N M N N N N N O N ~ M r M N N N M a N M m O ~ b1 " W W O tD W M m ~ N ~[I M m OI W W W N m m a O a W N a W W N M o a N m e N O Y W m m O r N M I m O M r N M m M N ~ O O N N M m r ~ N m r ~ ~ N M ~ r, ~ N ~ r ~ W ~ m r r r W ~ a W U r o M W ~ maM NWa Mm~ n Wam ome n arm raM~ ri rm W o n ~mmm i-z Nvr W m a--M M~ W a.-N W oM o M " ~n c~~ ~ ~ M Z Q ~ ~ ~ N M In a N M W R ~ N ~ O .- lD W y W r 1 L U. LL `G- r LL U. L C a U u L ~C f" C u Z m O N m m W N t p ~ a ttf W n O N r ~(1 N N O ^ T M O m m M^ t D N N ~ 1O O_ a n i m C L a a m E F- E H O N m m r ~If r W r y W r W M N N o ~ r W o N m N N A N N M M E ~- a 0 N r .- W W r m ~~ m ~ ~y W N m r r r M Qf ~ Q Q: W ~ a N m m N W O N ml a aI W m I r al r W rl r tff a o l m m N } r~ N b m N N W ~ N M A N N m N to W M ~ ~ O a W N a r m W ~ a W a M N a m a m In r W r W r N m ~ Q a Q W ~ m m m r al m N r 4 ~..~ W (7 Z r n W a Rm1 a ~ ~ N N G r If (A a z W ~ ~', Q z W W ao_ o o a m mM uo Wa+a ~ o Z .~`r o N ~,.~ N M ~ u Q 2 z a W ~ ~ LL } z w ~ ui ~ ~ (, % ~ Y > u( 3 N ~ ttf -. O ~ u. Y ~ a~qw ~u I ~ ~r"~j ~. az~ ; ~} a~ ~ O ~ a`~`~~i~ ~ ~ .¢a ~ i ~ ~ "~ v O ~ : ~ ~r~ ~ 600.DO t ~a7 <~ g ' N W'I ~ WI ~m WI ma'I a X41 N N M N a ELI a N a ~O O C r m r In ~ W N m 1~ MNriI mriaol rv4il moiail eca 0 a m W o ~ m N .- ~ W r W .? N ^aao °~ ~ M W O' N L v U ~ N a v N 9 G ~ E m c u v c ;; t 3 m ,~ E `m ~ v~ +'~. E w ~`OE«-' y ~ F o ~~~d.om Q~F¢ x, „ ~ " ~~~ ~ d :ri~¢ ACTION NUMBER # ITEM NUMBER # -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE, COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Service Award Presentations COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Board of Supervisors recognizes employees for their years of service to the County. Employees are recognized for five years of service and successive five-year intervals. Employees are presented with a certificate of recognition at the Board of Supervisors' meeting and may select a service pin or other appropriate award through the Department of Human Resources following the ceremony. The list of 1993 service award recipients is attached for the presentation of service certificates. Following the presentation, a reception will be held to honor service award recipients and their families. We congratulate these dedicated employees. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ -° D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPR VED BY: • ( : ,G~.! Elmer C. Hod e County Admi ist ator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred ( ) Nickens To Minnix SERVICE AWARD RECIPIENTS FOR 1993 5 Years Richard Adkins Lynne Aesy Robert Babst Nancy Bailey Marvin Beckner Patricia Chockley Mark Claytor Brian Duncan Alicia Foliaco Rebecca Fralin Robyn Green Paul Grice Diane Guerrant Charles Hill Carl Johnson James Jones Jeffrey King Fred Lafoon Anita Gail MacKenzie Herman Meador Joseph Obenshain Ronney Price Thea Quillen Shelby Lynn Rogers Bruce Roy Clay Skelton Randy Smith Denise Sowder Claude Stover Jeffery Stump Sandra Thrasher Evelyn Wirt Utility Police Engineering Solid Waste Utility Sherif f Commonwealth Attorney Economic Development Engineering MIS Police Central Accounting Library Parks & Recreation Utility Grounds Maintenance Utility Radio Communications Sherif f Fire County Attorney Engineering Youth Haven Real Estate Fire Police Utility Engineering Engineering Fire Commonwealth Attorney Procurement SERVICE AWARD RECIPIENTS FOR 1993 (continued) 10 Years William Alls Sheriff Elizabeth Angel Sheriff Harriet Childress Parks & Recreation Katharine Claytor Human Resources D. Keith Cook Human Resources Jerry Custer Police Sheila Rose Dooley Engineering James Dorton Sheriff Timothy Flowers Sheriff Donna Furrow Police Thomas Wayne Haynes Police Bob Johnson Board of Supervisors John Krista Clerk of Court Marcia Patton Parks & Recreation Linda Payne Police Myra Sellers Parks & Recreation Richard Showalter, Jr. Parks & Recreation Frederick Sisson Utility Robert Smith Fire James Stump Utility Charles Wayne Williams Utility Billing 15 Years Timothy Beard Planning William Goode Engineering Ellen Groff Social Services Debbie Hogan Police Kenneth Johnson Solid Waste Katina Keith Library Everett Kendall Solid Waste Delbert Mays Custodial J. Kay Parr Sheriff Carol Paxton Police Steve Poff Fire Curtis Puckett Utility Gary Roche Police Robin Walters Library Diana Wilson MIS Robert Via Solid Waste SERVICE AWARD RECIPIENTS FOR 1993 (continued) 20 Years James Agner Utility George Altice Buildings Maintenance Toy Bowen Social Services Willie Bryant Solid Waste Jack Camden, Jr. Police John Chambliss Asst. County Administrator Wayne Davis Grounds Maintenance Joseph Divers Solid Waste Ronald Edwards Fire Larry Greene Grounds Maintenance Howard Guthrie Parks & Recreation Kenneth Kern Police Lillie Kessinger Social Services Art LaPrade Police June Long Sheriff Jack McCorkle Police Betty McCrary Social Services Elizabeth Pence Parks & Recreation Wanda Riley County Administration Brenda Smith Treasurer Gary Thompson Social Services Shari Vest Treasurer Thomas Walls Social Services Martha Webb Central Accounting Victoria Webb MIS Henry Wiley Custodial 25 Years Drema Campbell Library Lawrence Logan Fire Harold Palmer Solid Waste Fannie Sifers Sheriff 30 Years Paul Smith Utility .-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, FEBRIIARY 22, 1994 RESOLUTION 22294-6 CERTIFYING EBECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~. Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~' t ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Real Estate Tax Rate. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As reported to the Board of Supervisors at the February 8, 1994 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate Tax rate for the calendar year 1994 as follows: Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Real Estate Tax rate for the 1994 calendar year. No ordinance which imposes or increases a tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1-504). The proposed Real Estate Tax rate of $1.13 was advertised on February 8, 1994 and February 15, 1994; therefore, this tax rate is scheduled for adoption March 8, 1994. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator ~I,a AC'T'ION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens _ VOTE No Yes Abs ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'" ~ ~ - C• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As reported to the Board of Supervisors at the February 8, 1994 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the calendar year 1994 as follows: Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the 1994 calendar year. No ordinance which imposes or increases a tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1-504). The proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates were advertised on February 8, 1994 and February 15, 1994; therefore, these tax rates are scheduled for adoption March 8, 1994. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager s-,b-~ Approv d by, Elmer C. Hod e County Administr or ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () ~dY - - - Received () Johnson - - - Referred () Kohinke - - - To O Minnix - - - Nickens - - - ,~ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111311111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111j11 - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - ~ - __ APPE CE REQUEST NG ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ ~~PUBLIC HEARI _ __ SUBJECT: ~%/~~ ~ST/~ T~~=" ~/~ ~ 1C C~ 7-i~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me Burin the _ P g g _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c -_ ~~#~{'~~~Illllllllilllllllliillllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllm ,~ fr .._ REVISED ORDINANCE -TAX MAP NOS. IN ITALICS AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE 222 4-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.5 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE 6300 BLOCK OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12,13, 14, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE JOINT APPLICATION OF J. EDWARD CONNER AND CARY M. AND SHIRLEY I CUNNINGHAM WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.5 acres, as described herein, and located on the south side of the 6300 block of Peters Creek Road, (TAX MAP NOS. 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive (50' wide) 100 ft. easterly from the east line of Lot 11 of the R. E. Dillard Farm Map; thence leaving East Drive and with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 deg. 02' W. 308.69 feet to a point on the southerly side of Virginia Highway Route 117; thence with the same, N. 72 deg. 20' E. 227.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia highway Route 117 and with the westerly line of Lot 9, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 161.50 feet to a point on the northerly line of Lots 25 and 26, N. 63 deg. 58' E. 50.00 feet to a point; thence with a line through the center of Lot 26, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 150.00 feet to a point on the northerly side of East Drive; thence with the same, S. 63 deg. 58' W. 225.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and being all of Lots 2 through 8, all of Lots 22 through 25, and the westerly one-half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of Roanoke County in Plat Book 2, page 169. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None. A COPY TESTE: ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ti,. / ~•t// ,~ -, ""~ Qi >, ~ 4 ~ ~,,," ]I :awr ~j n rl .gym[ f•6~ ~+..ndww w t M/Rp~f,4v,~ F .ariw ~-'. f ~°' ~ ? tt .. ~jy~G~'•-~` ~ 5 AAAIEROEJ4N `~`' ~ ----'- ---5-- yn ,~• .~~ i - -'- ~ c. f OS N ~ tnK[wtw 1 : 1 ~ - ~.... VICINITY n MAP ~ P` ' - A ._.._ .. _.~ , I I .. I ~\ P° / ~ 16 t0 n ~ ~ \ / \ +a~ io '~~'C 18 ~ 9 +r!! NorlAmont .,tit \ s, ~~ .. `~~a \ Y ~~ ~\y / ~~ g r iir IIJS ao 24 ~, \ \ ' \ 26 =\' \~ ~ `~ 18 ly \. \ \ O .! o O - - T \ 27 \ \ ~ ~ a 3 ~ :~ °1!~ NorlA Foonolt " e..r n ~~ / ,`1~ :3 '.g ~ ,+ 32 31 30 X29 0 28 0 \\ \ ~~o~ '\ m / . 8 .+.., 33 + p~ ~~/ Nle 49 ' • 34 `\i • J~ iR~ ash 3 2•oec ~, •\• ~ ~ A 3- ,~ ,, L~ a ~~• ~. , ,~ 36 ',' 11 ~s1- \ rr e~5. / ~5 ' ~~ .'.v ~ 24 ~sos as ~Q 6\.. .. ss •?3, ° .1261 ,n ~ •. .' / pus ~ 28.2 ~ pOS :. . ~ 7 >r~ . C~ \ Aso :~ ~ ~., : . - - \ 3S `_\•r\ . `. ~ p dnekfis •a,a. 4T \ \ 3¢ +II~ \_ \ 42 :.+ ~Pi r+iy~r !«>x s.06Ac \ ~ \ ;~ o~~ ~ \ 999 \•\,. ~r, J \ \ \ . \ Pt. ~e - ~ .. ~ a \ ~ ... ~ -, \\ \ \\ O \ 3T 01 5 \ \ \ \ 6 \ 5.33 Ac. L \ .. \ ~\ 6.66Ae \~ ~ ~ \ \ \ '\ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \\ \ .. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ _ ~. DEPARZMEN'P OF PLANNING PETITIONER:: J. Edwarcl Conner/Gary M. 8 Shirley Cunningham ' .:.;/; REQUEST .` Rezone G2c to G2 .- . : ~ ~ . '~~'~ ZONIlVG ~~ ~ ~ '=~~~TAX MAP: •"~ 27.13 - 5 - 8, -9, -10, 11, -12, -33, -34, P/O 27.13 - ; . .. ,; .. .~ - - ~ .: 27.13 - 5 -13, -14, -30, -31, P/O 27.13 -5 -32 i AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE 22294-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.5 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE SOIITH SIDE OF THE 6300 BLOCK OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (TA% MAP NOB. 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33, 34, AND HALF OF 32) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C- 2 UPON THE JOINT APPLICATION OF J . EDWARD CONKER AND GARY M. AND SHIRLEY I CIINNINGHAM WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real l~ estate containing 1.5 acres, as described herein, and located on the south side of the 6300 block of Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Numbers 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33, 34 and half of 32) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive (50' wide) 100 ft. easterly from the east line of Lot 11 of the R. E. Dillard Farm Map; thence leaving East Drive and with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 deg. 02' W. 308.69 feet to a point on the southerly side of Virginia Highway Route 117; thence with the same, N. 72 deg. 20' E. 227.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia highway Route 117 and with the westerly line of Lot 9, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 161.50 feet to a point on the northerly line of Lots 25 and 26, N. 63 deg. 58' E. 50.00 feet to a point; thence with a line through the center of Lot 26, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 150.00 feet to a point on the northerly side of East Drive; thence with the same, S. 63 deg. 58' W. 225.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and being all of Lots 2 through 8, all of Lots 22 through 25, and the westerly one-half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of Roanoke County in Plat Book 2, page 169. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ,,.. ;- .ISO ---• - /~s.:T ~ '~ `~ 4' / . ~6 18 ~~ 9 f `, ~~ '' r O p n n° 6 '+ / ~ i ' S ' I 4 • ti` ~~ e 1~ \ s 18,0 19 ~" \ \ O J \ 26 p. ~ \ 27 I' \ ~ • O ~ 11 ` \ ` ~t14 \.A ~y i~0 . J 1~ , IL ~ \ \ \ \ ~ C ~ f~~I ~ ~. i7 IJ NOrIA `gOOnOtt , N N ~ 7/il/` CAur[A ~~ \\ / / 31 30 X29 28 a \ \ i~pT / ~ a~ 2 ~ o~ 'o \ O ,. - J ~.rfar.n , - ., 33' isa ~i Nie 49 r 8 34 ~ • ~ - ~R~G a3°9 'S z-o Ac 3~ ,: Lc a ~-` `~ , z,, `!~i •! ~Q C ,ys ~ y" ° ..+261 u / ~° - ?6 a • ~ w! 28.2 3 u~! .r /~ (/~' / _ 1~~~ ~~ \ \ ~° 33 . ~~~ ' ~\I' \ ~` ~ O riindJ.lp Mrw 47 \ \ 3¢ nk~ \ X32 ~' .rot vs-q. tog. s.o6se J \ `\ 1 Nr' \ ~ ~v Jny ~, 9 \ \ \ \ 6`J \ \ ---•-~~ \ \ C ~'~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ 5 \ - 37 \ \ \ O\ ` \ \ ~ \ 5 \ - \ 5.33 Ac. \ .. \ \\ 6.66Ac ~_ -. \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \- \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 4 \~ \~ \~ _ _ \\ \ -_ _.. 1, ~ 43 - :~ ~ \ ~ a my ~ ~ ~~=~~~. o~ 5` ~ • 0~0 . _ ~, • `~ - "" ~. DEPARZMENT OF PLANNING PETITIONER.: J. Edward ConnerlCary M. 8 Shirley Cunningham - ~ - :~-.REQUEST: Reione C-2c to C-2 - -~ - - '~~~ ZONING - ` - `°`TAX MAP: - - 27.13 - 5 - 8, -9, -10, -11, -12, -33, -34, P/O 27.13 - 5 ~? '~ . .. _ ~ . ~:.: :., ...;,, . - ... ; -' .. 27.13 - 5 -13, -14, -30, -31, P/O 27.13 -5 -32 T-1 PETITIONER: J. EDWARD CONNER AND CARY M. AND SHIRLEY I. CUNNINGHAM CASE NUMBER: 4-2/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 1, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 22, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham, filing jointly, to rezone approximately 1.5 acres from C-2C to C-2, located in the 6300 block on the south side of Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Robinson, Witt, Ross, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terra a Ha,~ ngton ecretary Roanoke G6unty Planning Commission 1'~~ MEMORANDUM Date: January 26, 1994 To: Planning Commission From: Janet Scheid, Planner Re: Conner & Cunningham Rezoning - 6300 Block Peters Creek Dr. Case #4-2/94 The petitioners are requesting that this property be rezoned from C-2 with conditions to C-2. The immediate plan for lots #13, 14, 30, 31, and one-half of lot 32 (see attached vicinity map) is to provide parking for the Kwik-Kopy Printing Center that is planned for the building on the adjacent lot. At this time staff is not aware of any plans for the remaining lots involved in this request. The owners would like to remove the proffers in order to maximize their flexibility. Background In February 1989 this property, containing twelve separate parcels of land, was rezoned from B-1 and R-1 to B-2. This action was at the request of the owner for the purpose of building the Boomer's Restaurant. The following proffers were attached to this rezoning: 1. Property will not be used for such businesses as hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, new car dealerships, barber/beauty shops, and flea markets. 2. The building will be a single story. 3. Restaurant will have no dance hall space. 4. No flashing signs and no portable signs. Permanent fixed signs only, limited to 80 square feet. 5. Lighting will be arranged so as to light only the lot of the permitted use. 6. A 10-year stormwater detention facility with a two-year release shall be constructed. 7. A maximum of three game machines will be on premises. 8. Site development shall occur in compliance with newly adopted County street and off-street parking design and specification standards. One entrance only on VA 117. ~i 9. At a minimum, Type C screening and buffering shall be implemented on eastern, western, and southern property borders. The restaurant. was not built on this property and it has remained vacant. Applicable Regulations The owners will be required to apply for a commercial entrance permit from the Virginia Department of Transportation. In addition, site plan review will be required if this property is developed. Comprehensive Plan This property is designated Transition on the Roanoke County Land Use Map. This request is generally consistent with the principles of this designation. Recommendations This request involves the removal of proffered conditions that were placed on this property, in 1989, to accommodate a very specific use. That use, the restaurant, was never built on this property. Due to the design and structure of the 1992 Zoning Ordinance most C-2 uses will not require proffers to mitigate land use impacts. The more problematic C-2 uses that are permitted by right, such as automobile dealerships, automobile repair services, construction sales and services and kennels, have additional use and design standards that will mitigate their land use impacts on neighboring properties. Therefore, the current proffers on this property are of little value. Staff recommends that this petition be approved and forwarded on to the Board of Supervisors. c_....~ff ..ten nn/v ~~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. P,rr~i~H ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~•~ ~ --_ .._ __ THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. : NS V R/s V NS V 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Consultation :~~ Metes and bounds description ~.~ Proffers, if applicable ~~ Application Adjoining property owners Justification / . • Wat~~ Rd ~e`^/er application l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and -,..: am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: - COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 . (703) 772-2068 FAX (703y 772-2030 For staff use only 1 date received: received by:~~ i, i application fee: PC/BZA date: placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v .. Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application :~> Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ?t Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's aflent or~contiact purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent the owner. r • Owner s Signature:. . Foi StaN Use Only: Case Number .. Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit rea welfared Please anshwer the foldlowing justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and gene questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. . ~ ~ THIS REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS FROM TFiE SUBJECT PROPERTY . TriOULD ALLOi~l A FUTURE USER:`HORE. FI~ILITY~ PROVIDING A 'RETAII~; .:SERVICE . OR COMMERCIAL FACILITY SERQIl~iG THE COMMiTNI itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer; roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. .. THIS REQUEST iTOULD RAVE NO ADVANCE Il'!I'ACT ON ADJOINING~E ~NZ'INDIT TO ~~G AREA OR TID; PROPERTY ITSELF. THIS REQUEST iwtOULD IN THE .AREA AND PERMIT MORE FLF,%IBILITY OF FU'T'URE DEPELAPMENT • . . For SraN Use Only: Case Number ~~ Applicant CARP M. 8c SHIlZ.~ I• CUNNIlZGIiAM The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. THIS REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY • liiOULD ALLOIif FOR DEVELAPMENT CONSISTENT liiITH THE IlITENT OF C-2 ZONING . THE • .BffII.DING ON COiYTIGUOIIS PARCEL 27.13-5 W~ BE IISED FOR A COM[~RCIAL PRINTING FIRM SERYIIIG THE COMMUNITY. ~ . .J Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County a Comprehensive Plan.- - THE°~REMOVAL OF PROFFERS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Ti+TII.L ALLAN THE ONNERS - ~ . ±.: TO UTILIZE THEIR PROPERTY IN 'A i!iAN2~2 CONSISTENT i~TITH TFIEIR BUSINESS PLAN ~ . 'w ~ 0~ ABpyE, THIS USE IS RECprII~t~IDED BY ROANOgE COUNTY'S COMPREEiENSIYE PLAN ~'OR THE ~•AREA. . ,, _ ' Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding _ area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~ ~'A THIS REQUEST :H9S NO IMPACT ON THE PROPERTY, THE NEIGI;IDORS• OR TID; INCONSISTENT • iiiITH DESIRABLE IISES OF SAME. FtTRTHERMORE, IT HAS NO EFE~CT ON I~CIPAL SERVICES, SCHOOLS,,'ETC. . O~ ROANp~F ti ' - 9 z c~ 1838 ~~+~~~ ~~ • UTILITY DEPARTMENT •. August 24, 1993• Mr. J. Edward Conner 6007 Buckland Mill Rd. Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Conner: T~ RE: Tax Parcel No. 27.13-5-13, 14, 15 Tax Parcel No. 27.13-5-30, 31, 32, 33 Due to the resubdivision of the above referenced lots, the new parcel 24A has been created which would normally require a payment of water and sewer connection fees before the subdivision could be approved by the County. ~ ~ •• In this particular case onl due to the zoning of this area, it is not known what size water service would be required for lot 24A. :~It is also very possible that new -.lot~24A may becombined with the remaining properties when it is~finally:developed.=''-Therefore,-in ~`•`this case onl , the subdivision -can be approved without the payment ~` - of-the water and sewer connection •fees. •. ~ - . _ .. _ - _ ~ Please advise any potential owner ~or .user of this property that the - - -water and sewer connection fees would have to be paid before it could be developed. - • If you have any questions or need additional clarification of the above information, call me. Sincerely, ~ Cliffo ~gi P•E• Utility Director. ~~ mh c: Arnold Covey . Cathy Cook -~ =1 _u _ ,. (:- .€ +~~ ~ F i~ ~ .~ ~ 3 3 :~ 7 1 ~` ' - .1. t'6 ~ i . : 7. f .` f-' ~ a G' •, s- i ~ ~t Y t:, :~ :'; _ ~:~ _~i ~'=~ ~ ~ -:.~ ~~ #~ ~• ~ f ~r ?' s ~ ~~: ~; }~ -`- ~' s ~~ <<~~ ,Z~ _~ ~{ -~ ~_ [ _ _^. ~~ _ _ ~~ .~~~~ -~t :. _ ~ :~; 1 =~. ,_ ~. 1_ ~. :~-~ i h t r~ ~ ~ ~ 3 A _ j S'' `, ' . ~ ~~i c _ ::_ 'l~ 3`1 1 A ~ ~ + . ,* ; ~' P PocF L--- ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ . L. ~~ A A \ ~~h~i ~ ~ NVa ~~ ~~ ~o~ of ~~ ~~= ~ ~ W e 4i m ~ I J r_ a~0 ~~ ~ I q L__J ~ w.POCE~ • 1 1, I T 1 i IP(s) ~erar ear I ~ 1 ~ •- MIXJND M'~ >FF ~ V ~ ~ - --~-~' $ ,L--~ v, ~ - JO~ ~ a. c. 21.a' 1~- .uE7FR ~ , I ;, \ / ~ I N ~i `~ ~0~0' >~ Tox Porce/ No. ?7.73-5-26.1 ~ '- ~ ~ ~ :- ~ GERALD w. ~ D/ANE M. A T1C/NS n ~ h ~ ~ ; '" ° ~ D. B. 1?6J, Pg. 1871 H^ a~ h d a~ ~ "~ ;~ q V~ N o g q o a~ ~ ~ h e GREEN R/OCE SOUTH 20 ~~ 2~O ~ ro ~ -+ N a¢a ~ ao. ~' I ~. a' 4a 4 U ~' ~ ~- ,-- O ~p 2 ~ I ' ~ ~ I 100.00• ~ ~ • IP(s) ~••--S 6J 4.T X19 H' ,pt'St' EAST ORl l/E, N. W. NOTES.• - ~o. St. Rte. 1865 - l. 1}d5 PUT wAS PREPARED HI,'HOU~ TNC BENEFIT CFA (S0~ R/W) A7LE REPp9T ANO 7NERfp4E w~ Y N07 /NO/U 7F AL: ENGT/f/B£RANCYS UPOr T)+'E•PRp°ERTY. ?. '1)/E SUB ECT PYPQ~ERTY /S NOT M1N/N A F.E..u ~. OEF/NED /ZOAO HAIARO ICfvE' AS OF QCTQ9CR 17, 1978 FE.I/.A. STULyfS l1+'E PRA'ERTY /S w/1H/N IQ'~/E C AS ,9/OINV Qy f.E.AI.A. Cpv,4UN/TY P,WEZ Na 570190 UR10 A. PLAT OF 'SUR IiEY FOR - ~`CAR Y ~ M. `CUNN/NGHAM s~wKS' ~soc'NrFS. P c. ors - s~:~~a4s - SH/RLEY . /. ,:CUNN/NGHAM ~ ~ J1.~ cucK A-~NUE . • RGHNOKE, {~1RC/N/A ?f016 Of l1/eW Lof 10A ~ ~~nTl Tt T-!'.SAS PE~-RS . C,RE-E- ~ ~ •. ~ Rpq~, /V GY ` ~'~- Rye. No. >T7 _ (BAR/ABLE ly1pTJ.~, R/yy J . In nva{r/ ?23' t/- Tt7 ,SCX/7H OR. N.1-: ~~ I ~ N icau~s o'+ ~ ~r+t ~, w "r - vk ;o„u,+ °1.'-"`,.~ " wocut Q isi .~ ~•~,,, .,,own~n G rood .+[ROLyi w. '2E ~~ _ y ~ ? ..~35}~„"~~i~ st .'• ~_ _SUMMERDEAN , . °i~ NDS ~• t (sm~/ins i~.rEiww/ ,~ ~ 1 a. ~~ e 4 ; `~" ittSt = mot" ~~r~ / ti w s I ~ i F av •Q~, js ~ IL ~ I ~~~~ ~ ~..~, _ r. VICINITY MAP ~.._n.__..~ Pt~N` . - --•:170 ---• /~s.a ~ R~ `~ .e' ~ ~6 18 ~` 9 ~~ / 8 a° ~~ 7 O 0 c n „0 6 ''r 4 ~r ~~ 3 t / 4 • 1• •``t0 s J>~ , q• ~/ ~/~ 2 3 ~.~ 'toy. s= _ /~ \ tQ~ to ~~~R\ 8tt NurtAmon~ ,.sit -\ s tt --. (•>~t rt \ f5 ~`~ e Iw ~~ >D •t \ ~ ~ \ ~It \ ~~ /23d f \ \ t ao '\: 24 \~ 18,E _ 19 \ J \ \ O tr \\ ~ 26 I°~25 ~d \ , ° : ~ - \\ ~ \27 tt \\ a t O t t~ \ \ \ ~y4 \ a 'J \~ o ~ o . / ~ tt \ \ \ \ ~\ i~ sat snot q Nor/A ppnokt to M \ 7/iJ/~CA ytCA '~\ \ / / 31 30 X29 „ 28 $ \ \ s4~= ~ / / 32 ~ o ~ c \ O~ ~ oV 1~ ~ ~ • ~ Jb.ti Mme.. ~, h / p 'dr d 8 s rr 33~t `'t r..c+.o ~ OG~/ ~ _ NH ~ 49 ' ~ R t 'S 2.~O/k t . 34 ~;`i ~ . - ~~ ~ ~ C2 36 `'Di ~;tt ~p C\ ~ y. 'y~. ~ .1261 0 \ - \. O\ \ \ \ \ G \ \ 5.9~ ac. \ .. \ \\ 6.66Ae ~_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ - ~ _6 G • ~ aU 28.2. iN ss 1 ~~ \\ '~~C~ _ X211 _ - '. ~~T~~TTTT r ~ ~ //0141 ~~ - ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ /\tt ~ + ..O lind:sjv ~xtcs• 47 \ \ '_ 3¢ _ ~ . - ~ //k~ \ rig ~' .aoc var_gt ca.R •.o5sc \ :t -~... \\ ~ •' ~ \ \ 1 2 s° • 5~• \ \ \ \ ~ 37 0tc • `~ "" ~: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PETITIONER: ' J. Edward Conner/Gary M. 8 Shirley Cunningham ...~ ,:REQUEST:. ;Rezone C-2c to C 2 : ~.' `'AND ZONING ~~' ~ .':TAX MAP: ~~ .; " 27.13 - 5 - 8, -9, -10, -11, -12, -33, -34, P/O 27.13 - 5 - - ~ : ' ; ~' .27.13 - 5 -13, -14, -30, -31, P/O 27.13 -5 -32 -~, i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.5 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE 6300 BLOCK OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33, 34, AND HALF OF 32) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE JOINT APPLICATION OF J. EDWARD CONNER AND CARY M. AND SHIRLEY I CUNNINGHAM WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.5 acres, as described herein, and located on the south side of the 6300 block of Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Numbers 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33, 34 and half of 32) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. C 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: ~'` BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive (50' wide) 100 ft. easterly from the east line of Lot 11 of the R. E. Dillard Farm Map; thence leaving East Drive and with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 deg. 02' W. 308.69 feet to a point on the southerly side of Virginia Highway Route 117; thence with the same, N. 72 deg. 20' E. 227.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia highway Route 117 and with the westerly line of Lot 9, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 161.50 feet to a point on the northerly line of Lots 25 and 26, N. 63 deg. 58' E. 50.00 feet to a point; thence with a line through the center of Lot 26, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 150.00 feet to a point on the northerly side of East Drive; thence with the same, S. 63 deg. 58' W. 225.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and being all of Lots 2 through 8, all of Lots 22 through 25, and the westerly one-half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of Roanoke County in Plat Book 2, page 169. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning\mnner ~_ f~°"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF sUPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE 22294-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.43 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4037 ELECTRIC ROAD (TA% MAP NOS. 87.07-1-39, 40, AND 41) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF A & M ENTERPRISES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.43 acres, as described herein, and located at 4037 Electric Road, (Tax Map Number 87.07-1-39, 40, and 41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of A & M Enterprises LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southeasterly side of Virginia State Primary Route 419, said point being Point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat and being the northeasterly corner i of the property herein described and adjacent to the property of Atalantis Group, Inc.; thence leaving Route 419 and with the line of Atalantis Group, Inc., property, S. 45 deg. 45' 00" E. 402.6 feet to Point 2, a fence post corner, corner to the property of Emma S . and Earl S . Cunningham; thence leaving the Atalantis Group property and with the line of the Cunningham property the following three courses and distances: S. 50 deg. 30' 00" W. 131.3 feet to Point 3, marked by an iron pin; thence N. 45 deg. 07' 28" W. 89.33 feet to a fence post corner, being Corner 4; thence S. 51 deg. 40' 00" W. 232.10 feet to an existing iron pin, being Corner 5, said point being on the northeasterly side of a 20 foot road right-of-way; thence with said road, N. 43 deg. 08' 00" W. 99.2 feet to existing iron pin, being Point 6, said point being corner to the property of John H. Lipscomb and David A. McCray; thence with the Lipscomb and McCray property the following four courses and distances: N. 41 deg. 03' 00" E. 132.71 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 7; thence N. 49 deg. 01' 11" W. 163.11 ft. to an existing iron pin at Corner 8; thence S. 40 deg. 01' 56" W. 9 ft. to a fence post at Corner 9 and N. 47 deg. 52' S9" W. 86.69 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 10, said point being on the southeasterly side of Route 419; thence with the southeasterly side of Route 419 the following two courses and distances, with a curve to the right having a radius of 929.93 ft. , a chord bearing of N. 58 deg. 07' 01" E. , an arc distance of 90.38 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 11; thence N. 66 deg. 42' 0" E. 169.3 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 1, the Place of Beginning; and containing 2.43 acres and being as more particularly shown on Plat of Survey dated June 3, 1985, made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2 A COPY TESTE: sue/ C~.!__l_1.~. Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 >..~ '' p~ I' ~ --- - - - - ~ /JI I /1 / b o J ~~~ a~ X06 ~,~ / 49 r• c ? A ,ors „ X956 ~ ~t G/ ~ ~ ~~s Jl4t ~ ~ ( / e° i~ .-f tf ~ f~ / ' / ~ q,° 44.1 i ° f o~~~ 2 oa 1 0 o d ~~ ~~ / 0 5 •• ~ e4'q o • \ J9J9 / - - - ~i~, ° Vj~ ~~~ '0, . ~ °~ ,P T. 43 ~~ ~~ ~ ~' ° o rr ~~ jj frY ~ f - ~~' ° J ti~ - <+ t 36 42 e ;.C?AC ~ ~ / ~ ~ - _ •,1'29 ~ 44 At (D) 1 ~~ - ~ ~ J~• o ~ 0 h - ' [ . ~ ~ ,. . ~ 1.77 Ac lG -_ ° e .• / . ~ A ~, /~O ~ ~ / ~ 'r28. ~b fyoa ° ° ~ e ~ ~ ~ •,• ' 3I 44 Ac sv _ ~( /(~~P b - ~ 1. ~~ 1 24 . 226 Ac '~/1 21 2T 1.62 AC a 1.69 Ac ulooscs[o ar fT~llr.[T e01 33 2.CB Ac 32.2 32.1 • - S36 Ac CZ ~3 `DEPARTMENT. OF PLANNING ~:-- :: - _ .: PETITIONER: A8tM Enterprises, LLC -; , „ , ~ " ~...~- AND .ZONING ~ ~ . - ~ ~= REQUEST:..: Rezone C-2c to C-2 - I ~: : -1 - 39, -40, -41 .TAX MAP. 87 07 . ~ ._ I1f y}.: ~- -~ _ .. _ _. _..... .. _._.. _. __ .,-r 4 S ~•• ~A a r V~poc~ ~ S2J ~ 1,19 At U ~~ \ 'ee Oyu 1 ~} t +• ~e e ~r Q: `` O ~~ C 44 2 ?6 Ae (DI ~.azAC (a C2~ 34 S7i ac Ta PETITIONER: A&M ENTERPRISES LLC CASE NUMBER: 5-2/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 1, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 22, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of A & M Enterprises LLC to rezone a 2.43 acre parcel from C-2C to C-2, to allow retail uses located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Robinson, Witt, Ross, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ington, •retary Roanoke ~nty Planning Commission T-?- County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington DATE: January 18, 1994 RE: Rezoning Request of Request to Remove Zoned C-2 located Spring Magisterial A & M Enterprises LLC; Proffered Conditions on 2.43 Acres at 4037 Electric Road in the Cave District. This 2.43 acre property was conditionally rezoned by the Board of Supervisors in December 1991 to allow the operation of an auto body repair shop on the property. The proffers accepted by the Board limited the use of the rear of the property to an auto body repair shop, and also limited the operational characteristics of the proposed use. A copy of the 1991 proffers is attached. The auto body repair shop was never operated on the site. The building has been mostly vacant since that time except for a temporary retail clothing outlet that is currently operating in the front portion of the building. The applicants now wish to remove the conditions on the rear portion of the property so that the entire property can be used for a retail use that is allowed by right in C-2 zones. The property is located within a Core land use designation as defined in the comprehensive plan. It is surrounded by other property zoned C-1 or C-2. The staff believes that it would be appropriate to remove the proffered conditions from these parcels. The 1992 Zoning Ordinance was designed to allow the location of commercial uses in Core areas without the necessity of proffered conditions. Depending upon the exact use proposed, the applicant may need to comply with the Use and Design Standards contained in Article IV of the Zoning Ordinance. These standards, if applicable, will be applied at the time of site plan review. C:\WP51\PC\AM ENTER r ;: i~E ~-.mr~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703} 772-2068 FAX (703} 772-2030 c,,, cf~{{ //CP nnly ~"' eiv d: date r received by: ~ 6, applicaUOn e~~ PC/BZA dater I iY placards issued• ' BOS date: nay ~Y 1, ~- G S Case Number: ~~, _ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NU i tst A~~tr i to ~r r,w t ~~ THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. • --- wa ~ ws v - . .. ws v • Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee _ __ Application Metes and bounds description, Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application - Adjoining property owners J ~ ~ / hereby certify that l am either the owner.of the property or ;the owner's agent or contract purchaser and ,;~ : am actin •w~th the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~ - . •~ . :: -.- . . .-;.. -~ ` ' Owner's Signature: Fvi S(eH Use Only: ease Numoer :u; ~.;.-~ - - - - - - - - S~i~~ ' Applicant A & Enterprises, LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The property is presently zoned C-2 with conditions. The applicant desires to remove the proffered conditions that restrict the use of the property to an automobile collision repair facility and resonably incidental and related purposes. The proffered conditions provide for amore intensive use of the property. Please .explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and .policies contained in the Roanoke County ~ Comprehensive Plan. _ .. The removal of .the existing-proffered conditions will allow the district classification to conform to the general guidelines zoning y; - --and policies°as outlines`in~the Roanoke Count Comprehensive Plan. =The property is'identified as -being in~the`Co meets the land use ,. - - Classification (C-2) `Commercial District"Zoning ,.;guidelines and policies 'for Core areas. ' ' : ~:. ~~ Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrouna~ng area, as t~lell as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, Darks/recreation, and fire/rescue. . The removal of existing proffered conditions will impact poan iv~e on the property .itself, the adjoining properties, surrounding area, as well as on public services and facilities. The use of an automobile collision repair facility is not compatible to the surrounding neighborhood. L ;y _{ ~_, f..t.. ~,, _ ... v ~ ~ . S V d ~ o. e : ~' y ri OC I ~ , N ~, , w y ~ i«wi i ~ ~ C ~" ~ i~.~i+il C ~ u p ~. .~~ C 0 p ^ ~ ~ ~ / d I , I ~i{ ~ ~ 1 = ' G '~ ~ , ' S iai~`~ 4 ' =;!a: I L: t ~~ i I ' !. i~M~ {i ti ~ 3~ ZI i ~ I r ~'L, ~t i t.. V a [7 r f r; . . ROAHOZCE CODNTY -~+, DTILITY DEP?,RTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .Date Name of Applicant Phone Address of Applicant _ Name of Developer - Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Phone ' - Address of Design Engineer Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND ~PLADTIMETRIC' NUMBER) Acres.:: Size of proposed development in .acres: - ~. Give minimum- and :maximum elevation . (Use USGS Elevations) at -.which the individual water/sewer service connections would beet°MSLed: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum Is .this application for a development that will be a-part or No Yes 'section of a.larger future development? _ If yes; provide map of entire.' area if available. . _ _ ~ ~` (OVER) _ ~ - ~ n t ,-,~ {~ ~- .c~`~ f.,-.~ _.- ~ ~ °~ •''~ ''~` ~` f~:r' w ~~~~ t~,,.~-~~~ z~L=. -S nature ~•of ~ pli .. _ ti,.• .°~ ^ ~ G 44 - 206 Ac (D) 3.a2 Ac lCl C2G - ~4 ~__ __ ~ \ 21 "~ ~~ ..... _ "" ~ ~' DEpARTbtENT OF PLANNING ~: ; . ` - s. PETITIONER: A&M Enterprises, LLC ,; ~-. _. " • r , = ~, AND .ZONING. _ ' ~t' REQUEST: '- Rezone C-2c to C-2 - ..: c? •. ~ ~ 7.07 -1 - 39, -40, -41 TAX MAP• 8 - _ i. Q ~ ~• ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.43 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4037 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 87.07-1-39, 40, AND 41) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF A & M ENTERPRISES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.43 acres, as described herein, and located at 4037 Electric Road, (Tax Map Number 87.07-1-39, 40, and 41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of A & M Enterprises LLC. 3 . That said real estate is more fully described as follows BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southeasterly side of Virginia State Primary Route 419, said point being Point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat and being the northeasterly corner of the property herein described and adjacent to the property _.~~ of Atalantis Group, Inc.; thence leaving Route 419 and with the line of Atalantis Group, Inc., property, S. 45 deg. 45' 00" E. 402.6 feet to Point 2, a fence post corner, corner to the property of Emma S . and Earl S . Cunningham; thence leaving the Atalantis Group property and with the line of the Cunningham property the following three courses and distances: S. 50 deg. 30' 00" W. 131.3 feet to Point 3, marked by an iron pin; thence N. 45 deg. 07' 28" W. 89.33 feet to a fence post corner, being Corner 4; thence S. 51 deg. 40' 00" W. 232.10 feet to an existing iron pin, being Corner 5, said point being on the northeasterly side of a 20 foot road right-of-way; thence with said road, N. 43 deg. 08' 00" W. 99.2 feet to existing iron pin, being Point 6, said point being corner to the property of John H. Lipscomb and David A. McCray; thence with the Lipscomb and McCray property the following four courses and distances: N. 41 deg. 03' 00" E. 132.71 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 7; thence N. 49 deg. 01' 11" W. 163.11 ft. to an existing iron pin at Corner 8; thence S. 40 deg. Ol' S6" W. 9 ft. to a fence post at Corner 9 and N. 47 deg. 52' 59" W. 86.69 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 10, said point being on the southeasterly side of Route 419; thence with the southeasterly side of Route 419 the following two courses and distances, with a curve to the right having a radius of 929.93 ft. , a chord bearing of N. 58 deg. 07' 01" E. , an arc distance of 90.38 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 11; thence N. 66 deg. 42' 0" E. 169.3 ft. to an iron pin at Corner 1, the Place of Beginning; and containing 2.43 acres and being as more particularly shown on Plat of Survey dated June 3, 1985, made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning~a&m AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIBSDAY, FEBRIIARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE 22294-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO CHARLES COOPER TO ESTABLISH AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT LOCATED AT 4925 BOWER ROAD (TAB MAP NOS. 76.07-3-13 AND 14), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Charles Cooper has filed a petition to establish an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07- 3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 14, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 22, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to establish an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Charles Cooper to construct an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, with the following conditions: a) The accessory apartment shall only be occupied by family members related to the owner/occupant of the principal residential dwelling on the property. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with condition amended excluding reference to rental, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: Supervisor Kohinke A COPY TESTE: ~°d . Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney • ~ _ 2 nn0 v1 1 i 4, ~ • 90 - 3~tr 1„e+•.oco cl~R orr s °fe ~ ^_Si~ 'EX ~~ i~ +.,. Ns+ 1 z _Ic { 1LLEY Lc Z ~~... ~ s ~ .ems ~..nnru v~l .KV /N3:1Aa/.1[~ co r . ~•~:~".: ~ _ -~ aw~s~•~'~~ .,.... _. I~~ 7lZl 4.• ~~E~-t ~^°~~~ ~/ "der _ ~ 110 D i l ~"{~!~ETI~ ,yam •, "'ML T ~ -~I-~ 11DELL > x °" 7 i011TM~' 3 ~" .1tt a• ~r ``tiaR ~~ • u;..~c ,nu oa . ~ .. 9E scc~zic~r ~` I c.~f ~.n u 3 .~ - LC H~~.~°~~ ~~~ ' "`ro ~. VICINITY MAP g -~•~< <,~ ~llOOy~ ~ ~' ~ i ~, N VNN if ~ !`moo r- - D a I .f ~~ C~~"y o~- ~/ N f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~• . ~ ~ ~ ~ \ n i *. ? \•~. _I~ ^• ~~~1.... .~ 1 • •• ~ • 1 \ 1 1 • ' 1 1 i O ^ ~ ~ ~ 1 • ~ * \ ~ ~ ~ ~ p+ \ 1 1 w wl ^ ~ . \ .~. + 'o ~ i ,.t s ~ \ \*• ~ ~ la• ~ ~ ^/+ ~\ \ ..' •. , 1 . ' ~ o. ~ ~~~r .~~ ~ ~~ •1 ~• `r ~ Ia°^0p ~~~ - - ~ ~ ~' ,. 1 1 ~ p. w o 1^ s 1 3 I 1 1 ~ 1n .1as • ~ 1 ~ / 1 1 ~ I O 1 ~ ~ - ~ 1 1 1 ~ N It 1' d 1 1 ~l:J 1 1 ~ - _ ~, ~ 3 7C'EMA/~ F ~?1 ~ D~ ,~o~l D '=-`.•~ <' :. ~ DEPARZMENT OF PLANNING ~ ~'T/TIDI~I,ER: ~ CEIi~~'L.~S COb~Ei~ ,;; -AND ZONING ~E4~uFST • ~ ~ SS~GIss L ~ 115 P~R~1/T - r.: - ~ -_ .. , ,gcc,FSSoRY ~Pst ~rM~'~!r ' _ ~ TsvC..N1dP # : 7G.v7 - 3 - !3 ,4dva -- /i~ ;~ - 7=3 PETITIONER: CHARLES COOPER CASE NUMBER: 1-1/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 1, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 22, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of Charles Cooper for a Special Use Permit for an accessory apartment, located at 4925 Bower Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM JAN) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired as to the enforcement of the recommended condition. Staff commented that they would rely on citizen complaints. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS The accessory apartment shall only be occupied and/or rented by family members related to the owner/occupant of the principal residential dwelling on the property. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Robinson, Witt, Ross, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H 'ngton, S etary R anoke County Planning Commission "~'= 3 STAFF REPORT PART I Petition: Charles Cooper File No.: 1-1/94 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mr. Cooper is requesting a special use permit to establish an accessory apartment attached to a single family residence currently under construction at 4925 Bower Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Description Mr. Charles Cooper is requesting a special use permit to allow an accessory apartment attached to a single family residence located at 4925 Bower Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial district. The property contains 1.08 acres and is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential. He has indicated that the apartment would only be used by family members and guests and is not intended for rent to the general public. Background On May 26, 1993, Mr. Cooper obtained a building permit to construct a single family residence on this site. In August, staff responded to a complaint and found that Mr. Cooper's residence included an accessory apartment. He claims that he advised the county of this when he obtained his building permit. Staff has no record or memory of such a disclosure. In September, Mr. Cooper filed an administrative appeal claiming the attached unit was a guest cottage and should not be considered an accessory apartment. The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) heard the matter on October 20 and ruled in Mr. ~~ Cooper s favor on the basis that the unit in question constituted only a single family residence with two kitchens." The Board of Supervisors, concerned that the accessory apartment provisions of the zoning ordinance had been nullified by this action, considered legal action and notified the BZA of its concern. Due to the concerns raised about negating the accessary apartment provisions; the BZA reconsidered its action at their November 17 meeting and upheld the zoning administrators decision that the unit was an accessory apartment. Mr. Cooper is now attempting to make the proposed apartment legal by obtaining the variances and special use permit necessary to establish such a unit in an R-1 district. On December 15 the BZA considered and approved variances for the location of the front entrance and floor area of the unit, with the condition that the unit not be used for general rental purposes. 1 ?° C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-41-2 (B) allows accessory apartments in the R-1, Low Density Residential district only upon obtaining a special use permit from the Board of Supervisors. In addition, such units must meet certain Use and Design Standards contained in Section 30-82-1 of the Ordinance, which establish basic design requirements and size limitations on such units. There is no limitation on who can occupy an accessory apartment in these standards. The BZA has approved variances to two of these standards (front entrance and floor area). The intent in allowing accessory apartments under the new zoning ordinance is to provide an opportunity for creating small rental units and create greater flexibility for home owners with changing economic conditions and family structure, while insuring certain design standards intended to protect surrounding properties are met. In the R-1 district, the special use permit is required in order to formally consider the appropriateness for such a unit at a specific location. Conditions can be imposed (versus requested or voluntarily proffered) in conjunction with the approval of a request to insure compatibility and appropriateness. PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Characteristics The property in question located at 4925 Bower Road consists of two lots platted in the late 1940's. The land has been wooded and slopes gently upward away from Bower Road. The single family residence and proposed accessory apartment are presently under construction in the center of the lot. Surrounding Neighborhood The adjoining properties along Bower Road are composed of single family residences. To the north is The Pines, an apartment and townhouse development. Access and Traffic The single family residence and apartment will be served by a private drive from Bower Road. In 1986 the Average Daily Trips (ADT) on Bower Road was 1,286. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout and Design The single family residence is located in the center of the double lot and contains 1,268 sq.ft. The proposed accessory apartment and two car garage are attached to the main residence by an open breezeway. The apartment will contain 468 sq. ft. The building design is contemporary with high cathedral ceilings 2 ..I ~ and a complex exterior shape with numerous alcoves and protrusions in the main dwelling. These characteristics give the impression of a much larger building than the square footage alone would indicate. Public Services and Utilities The property is served by a Private well and septic system. Other public services are within close proximity. No significant impact on these services is anticipated from this proposal. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is located in the Neighborhood Conservation land use category. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies and in particular; Policy NC-5, encourage infill of vacant lots, and Policy NC-8, permit limited density attached residential development provided exceptional housing design. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Accessory apartments will, in staffs opinion, become more popular with the changing needs of an aging population. This proposal has raised a series of questions and issues not because of what it is but how it has occurred. The apartment, in staffs opinion will have little to no adverse impact on surrounding properties or the neighborhood, and represents a good example of appropriate design and implementation of the accessory apartment concept. Sug_aested Condition Staff suggests the following condition be attached to insure compatibility: 1. The accessory apartment shall only be occupied and/or rented by family members related to the owner/occupant of the principal residential dwelling on the property. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley DATE PREPARED: December 22, 1993 Petition: Charles Cooper 3 File No.: 1-1/94 ~~ Fnr cfAff IISP_ OnIV COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date recei ~ % n 7 received by application f~~ PCBZA ~a ~~ , , J placards issued: BOS dat ~ Z~ Case Number: ` / L"/L,f Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: ~ REZONING U SPECIAL USE CIVARIANCE Applicant's name: Phone: 345-3092 Charles Cooper Zip Code: 24015 Address: 1810 Lawnhill Street, Roanoke, VA ~ . Owner's name: Phone: Address: SANfE Zip Code: Location of property: - Tax Map Number: 76.07-3-13 and 14 4925 Bower Road Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Community Planning Area: Windsor Hills Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 1.08 acres Existing Land Use: Single-family Residence 47,328 sq.ft. Fo/Staff Use Only Proposed Zoning: R_1 Proposed Land Use: use Type: Single-family Residence w/ Acessory Apt. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES XX NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? .YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ........ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE_ Ac:c:tr i to Ir ANr ur THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation / 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan ,/ Application fee / Application :~~ Metes and bounds description - Proffers, if applicable / Justification ~ `~ Water and sewer application / Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either t e owner of the property or the ow is agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/ed d c sent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ C~~ ,'r'-3 For Stall Use On/y: Casa Number _ Applicant Charles CooQer • ____ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and • justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. .. - - ` The proposed accessory apartment is intended for my sister, when, she visits, or my mother, should her health fail, and .guests if not- ~ otherwise occupied. This is consistent with the intent of ' accessory apartments in Section 30-82-1 of the zoning ordinance. Since the house with accessory apartment is built on a double lot,. the proposed use will not increase congestion or demand for services any greater than if each lot had been developed ~' separately, and is otherwise consistent with the purposes stated in • Section 30-3 of the zoning ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.::: ~ _ _ .: °~.The Neighborhood Conservation category .encourages infill •.. -~' development of vacant lots. The residence with the accessory apartment would occupy one of only two or three tracts remaining in ; ~: the City View Heights subdivision which was platted in 1951. The `~~~~ housing design is-unique and closely integrates the accessory •~ apartment- into the overall design, while maintaining the open space ~~ and yards found throughout the neighborhood. Please describe the impacts} of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. .. As a double lot the proposed structure will have no adverse impact on the property or on adjoining residences. As stated above, the residence with accessory apartment will have no greater impact than if the two lots had been individual developed and will probably have a lessor impact due to the size of the proposed units. ROAHOICE COUNTY ""'~,,, DTILITY DEPxRTM$NT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date >>/i~,~g~ Name of Applicant Charles Cooper Phone 345-3092 Address of Applicant 1810 Lawnhill Street, Roanoke. Va 24015 Name of Developer SAME Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of •Design Engineer Name of Contact Person SAME Phone, Phone Name of Proposed Development Type of .Development and proposed number of units (Be specific)• SinGle-family residence w/ accessory apartment Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND •PLANIMETRIC NUMBER) 4925 Bower Road Size of proposed development in acres: 1.08 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? ~ No Yes if yes,provide map of entire area if available. • Signature of pplican t ~~~. - •.. ~ 1 = %. ~ .~ ~ 50 GPM ~ ~. - ~~ I ~ , - - - - r- _ ~. . ~~ _ ' ~ - ALTITUDE ~- ~ ~ _ VALVE ~ _ + .,\ .. ,: ~a~ /' ~~ ~ OAK GROV ~ ~ ~. ms`s; ~ j~ ,• ~ _ / ~ 500y0~.0 GSR~''Q 'w _ ' ' I .1 f ~ ~ , ~'' •PI N'ES' M~ Fi~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ u -_ :~ Q';. - IS GPM - ~ _ 1: - ~ ' .: -BI L - ~ M ~ ~ - V - ~- ,~i ~ _ is ~'~'is` -'S ~-. G ~a 7. 1'' - _ - . O'~ ~. zy. _" .~ _ - - ''s - ~'- J . .~ s -? J t r t-~ 'x ~~ .k v v / Y~ : ~ t. t t t , .: (,~~ Ei 1Z ? -` 1, ..5. L _ - 1 ~ ~~ 1. [ ~.G.~.~-C ~: - ~C 1L0 CA _ ~+ _-_ '_ ~~:• - .•y' ~D' t -LYE I. -- - :i ( _ 7 - 1 ,/~. _ ' 5 _ - (' , { - .-~ i ~- I /56 ~ ~~ ~ ;. r . ~. _. 5, ~ ~~ .~: - .~ ~ ,'ire g ti -~ ~ ,.- 21 ~ a ~ j( O 1 I ~~249 ~ r'~ ~ + 600 ~! ~ _ ~^y_8OO ~ , ~ ~ 1000 ~ , rl '~ ~ t ~ .,1 i .~ t . p' ~ ~ ,. ~ # i ~ ~~ j ~~ ~ ~ ~. r ,. ,l CO~N'~'OUFZ INAL ~ 5~ ~ -• ~' 1000 GF~(p. Bl1 N•,~(IdGINIA S~` T At~f~,;~000RDJNA'rtE~. T' .,~ ~ `•;,~y -~~~~ ' ~ t. ~....:.jt I s ~„~..~-~3. '~,. ~~- ;Y-~ ~ '` -.` t j-~~. '~ ~ ~.,' j~ ~.~w' ~ ~ x ~ yr~ ~; I :.FHB t•_PE ~'~ E _~ ~ '` ! ~} T~ f - i Y.- /r . J' ct~ F' t t- ~ Y = y .l.r 1 ~ r ' S_ 7 _ ~_ ~' ~4. i r ~~~~~~ p-r•-, ~~. ,ry~~ J?`"yr..ti=}+. i~ ~'~ r a~.~i~f~ ~ ,~.F ~~. ~•.t {7-.r ~f"-'3 l~ow~c ~o~ ~crn~~~~~ ofi C hac~~~ Cook ~q a5 ~w~~ ~c1. ~. th~,«~c~~ ~o act . ^ki.=i~ av~yi"•:4 ia~i.tr~.~:r' rti c.~. {r :, 3. -t;~' .~~~ •.~ ~~". ~..:`'y y`• .~t ~~~. :t-;Y: :fi.` _,~:_ tY'~'-f-~ ~^2~- ~L ~;. ~'` ~Z~_~,.-':.•f ...Y~~ ~ ~r. ~I~. J _ _ G•~ ~j, ~ ~• ..r _- i - ~ ~ _-. •• `C. ,~ ~•~'•~`:1~~A-„ `'{ter;a. Q _~•~ ~•: •.~ j•:; l[' ~ \,t' .~~a~~c.'----.... ?~~ ~ x;441 ~Ztj- r~-y:'rl: J. v1 'l. Ij .~ + :. 7tt;' . y,wC RL '71 _~ V N .. _.~ _ ~.'X ~`~~iT ..a+Z~,ti x`Y:..~X.• - ~ - z . ~ ,7 . ~'((1 _ ~1 7'.~Y •~• . ~ '~ aF~'? ~ 4 -~ ~ 2 ui ' - - ~-t-~5 .. -~. ._ . _: "'4,.1~ :_ :d~.•'. J ~'' .1~ •- t• '~ .fit - _ -.: •~. -._ _ -. ~ - .. i yam! ~ -: ~:~`'•~S_.'..s; :~-. 1a7• Ofc'i?~ 'fiat" ~=9G~41~ {'~ t;'~;~(;:t' '~• .. _ - .. •'•' rC(•",Zit' , a? 'i. ~ .. ~~___-. ~:- ;: ~ -`~~ -. '' ~1'- ~ __ '~- .:> v, `•-':' • 3 mac`: ~~- ~c.. cY,' yam. '~OOC+:-~ tf rs ~Y :.. ": i`,'p~ O- ~ - . ~- `. - ~: •v • .3 ~ ._`_---- 7Y1~3~ ~`~ ~lilx _ .?,_ ~~• j7~ r> y• 1•~~.."' _ .~~=.-._1:Cj .X~ '•' uhf ~'yi~~l.•. .a_~.a.4..'E.:O \ _.~.~'',••a' I^ r~. .{!L•~. ( 1l' •.I ~~^ ~: Y.<T3 K.-. -. ... 4 „,,•.; ~: '•>.,• 0'.94X1.• .~="~"~ ;.~+~~ :- it's]"~ j J rho -~~-~• +?:':~3~~~. N- :~v~ I.Nxp x.M. ~ ___~_-- ~~~,~•.~;`'~-ate- -".;.~ •r'`~ ;!Jiv~l.`e~-Gix?- .•' '` :+ 14 ~• . .r~rn:.. i7 ~..~• ':J: _' alit _ ~~dC-. -~~ ~O iN.~_~•' -r .. .~:r~j'.li: r~'ti~~K;~~c'~ '< r~ '~ ~~ •.v'l. ~•=~'•'i.•. ~•Y 1t~..~lY~ •! ~~:. :i. j•.'.•"•.a: ::v-~f. ~.+ii+t22S•~,L;:Ji~..•r1' ~ ~t~i: :: :2'.a• _~,:~.:.,..~ .N_- -~ ±+•~.`•:fr~ 'i:^. •ai::~~. _ :1,„ -_'_•-_ - •..-~jwai;~?+.RC.z; ,•,.. ~~ .. ~ • • .1 ~ 1 a- ~ I n, a..+.. u-;-d 1 .' ' I . ' . ' ~j~ . - ~ .~ :• • U:. w W _ ~~, ~ ...... Q ~ . .. ~ 1° 1~ ~ 1. .__-- --- • _ '$I 14.1£1 W ...-----•- - 1 ..- ~r ..--------- i _ .__ . _- ~'~.. .d. - - .. _ . }'•' • i - ,•T _ ~~ '; ~ •t ..~_ '- Off. ~' ~} •~~-. _ In . Q i. y`..-^.y~_•. _ - t. a `.c~: --.. ~ f ~'} : •,_ _ .. - ___ - .hst% Q '~r.~t:C ;~•'ii.~~4~5T.-w•e~ 1 1 b' y p ~' .r ~. M ~ ° .?` Ti 1 .C; ~~..,I••7. ~i..•_t'•,1.<.~~ •3'i ~..~ t' d +f,'- - f .~------ ~ yy f~ z r '"._ t ~- ~ L.'r^N-s,~~' '~'_~1•. ~ tel. -^ _ ~plol9~_aZ '~ -~'':!' _ i :J -=---- ' . ,.. iT KA~••rJ.{r-~~ r'-+'` tV ~ ~ S ~~~ ~: 4-.O ~ Y 3 t- r ~ ~'• j. -~ .:f . ~ :,i.' ^:: J S f.l- ~ CI : . a~- 'sa:i%.- :.'~f.: Ids ~'t%y'`::• •_ •f-~• Cy ~f ~y~r ..l ~f .. a. -• _ :t N .O. - 'i• U • •i. `~ - •.~ ;:.~ ', . }; 4.01:.; : ~ :.a.: 1' ~lTa. • - . ~ -~,- :.------ - ;.°' - :;k-: ~.=•-ti - ~~ .1~=iy:` ~ 1. +...t..~' ~ ~"~ ~ _ " S ~y -U s~ ' '':~ y -Y:_- = - ~} _ . y •jl. .•` ~: -e' v"%` g. 7Jfi'.t'.- wr? '1^-:'~•• {}~~. ~ II '• ~ - ~ ~ • ~ ~~` - .a'; t~•• _ :fit. .r ~~oa'- '~';:~y; s `?;.1.:~= ?L..'~^:r~'::•5'LY •x ''?•:••;~a j 'F.' ,=:c'- -- 4 f:- min: i _t. ,y.:. 1. ~;.- da'= .r ~ ~ •~, l~l ~ ~ ' < ` •~N _ .~ %al'`~ " •c •;.=~•s,' 'i:';`~1;'-~'' %~ 'v:' ii^-f'"~+::=" ,ti 9 9H - a•Q'1S' ': ~~-' `..; n:-. ~j,%~~'•e:.•.:,.~.'.',w~fr" ~'•~~i~c: a`i~'f'~gyRLI~ s'Y `.•: _, .. ':i; ' •.;- ::,% .~' ' _ • •i~-.:. • _ _ ; ~ ~---- w:f i 7~-\'i~ t .i1~• .~.• ~i;r )I:.a'r' ~'`k` - Ij! t. :L~=f'i.:• - ` ~' - •': ?,.%,er~.± ~l •T",~'.,~.e_.'i•i' :r..~„„0'.1'.C. ~5~; : t~;.1'~/,~ ~ _ ~• ::'~ ~••:...~1 •-_ :.Y .~ ~ . J.y,l~ r , .:.. .• :.Y.,ia;~ _ ".^,•. 'a '} .'.:4N.rZ3 ~?v ~ ".. ,f'ti • ii > ~ h ~~ 1 1,;ya:...i. J .h}~~~~•~ •~•:_ .1 f/ ~y~ . f .'-. _ K~yr ~. i0 1 i~ .j c.o. -. 1 a. r ~ 1 s ~/ EK po 4;~. 3~(NnnD ~ .a ..°co cE~llliO"' s+.: ~~°M.. ~ ~.., Ex~ y,Nlw~,~ t 2 4 ~,3.~. `_Ir''.r~; r.~ T•~Y L _ T. ~a~':±_i. ~._~ ~T ~S., •~ ( p~ ~~~ ~ Al(ry7f ~~ ~ o. yo. ':. i c~~:L\~1"5a,.y $jj L ~L u.nncu vL._LK n+S:iNawC2 CO,~-~~. .... ~j ~ WAD-E S...~ il" ~ SM• --_y ~ ~- ~~"_' ~~ ~ / 1 ~II~ELL a~ •t ! (pIT r.:~.:~ 'per ~~ ' ~`~°^ _" VICINITY MAP ..roc L,., °` J _ !~ ~ ° ~ I N URN o .~~~ - 4 } i ~' .~ G~r-y ox" ~o~~loK~ ~'~~ w w W 1~~ ~._.~ ~ / ~ ~~ TTa pl°" t ,r ~ f s ~ / r~ / • - ' s T-' 1 aw i. / 1 1 ~1 a. ~ ~ ~' I ' ~ ' 1 1 r 'i ... ~ a s : 1 ~11 .i: ~ ... 1 3 ~ ` ao~ 1 1 1 -~ •' y~ . 3 \ 1 1 1 w 1 e~ I w ~a • , 'r t ~ d M 1 1 1 .w b x Mx 4 1 1 1 1 Ib M N Y 1• b ~Yr / 1 ~ 1 r \ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ -_ ~ ' %~i o ~ `~MAI~~ ,~o~l~'D ~'j ,~ ~ - Cf~/.4~E'L.fS G'Ob~Ei~ '~-= j _ "" :_ :.DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING :, ~'T/TIOI~I~R: - . . `~ "~ ``~ AND ZONING ~EQ7llEST..' ~ - S~clsi L Cl s~ P~R~1/T - _ . _ ,Q.c.G~'SSORY ~Pft ~TM~'~l T . .. r= - - -- Ts~X NjdP # : 7G:v7 - 3 - !3 ~c,rvs ~ !~ 'r~-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CHARLES COOPER TO ESTABLISH AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT LOCATED AT 4925 BOWER ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 76.07-3-13 AND 14), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Charles Cooper has filed a petition to establish an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 14, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 22, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to establish an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Charles Cooper to construct an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 1 T3 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, with the following conditions: a) The accessory apartment shall only be occupied and/or rented by family members related to the owner/occupant of the principal residential dwelling on the property. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\cooper 2 _ `~ ,. ~ ~ fJ ~~ REMARIGS TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TUESDAY FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ON Tf-IE PETITION OF CI-tARLES COOPER RE : 4 9 2 S BOWER RD . S . W . Gentlemen, it is indeed a pleasure to mee~°with you and discuss items of mutual benefit and concern to the citizens of RC. There are those that thought that the chief form of entertainment for some of us was to gather periodically and discuss the virtues of the "Too-Tall-Building". Yes those were fun times and I enjoyed locking horns in a battle of wits with my good friend Ed Natt, and then being treated to the delicacy of a stimulating intellectual discussion. Well, as the saying goes, the more things change, the more they stay the same. We've moved our meeting from an old schoolhouse to the County's new Taj Mahal, but we're still struggling with the same old problems we had with the "Too-Tall" fiasco, only this time it's "Cooper's Caper" dealing with Mr. Cooper's "guest house", a.k.a. "cottage", a.k.a. "accessory apartment" located in a house with two kitchens, then olny one kitchen, then two kitchens, that is at last count. There are a few other interesting aspects to the "Cooper Caper". To wit: he ahould have been required to hook to the county water system rather than been issued a well drilling permit, according to the county's Utility Engineer; the square footage of the apartment exceeds the code allotment for the size of the main dwelling; the location of the front door does not conform to the code; and, the property has not been posted properly. Not all of these problems are entirely of Mr. Cooper's own doing, but his flaunting of the RC Zoning Ordinance has been facilitated by the county RC Board of Supervisors, February 22, 1994 page 2 itself. Why was Mr. Cooper given a well drilling permit in the first place? Why was he given a permit to build something that did not meet the code? After he was given a "stop work" order, why was it lifted? Why wasn't this project monitored more closely when the county knew there were problems? How in the name of common sense could the BZA rule that this apartment was really an apartment, even though it met the requirements of one as per Sec. 30-82-1, par. A ~, B, Article IV, RC Zoning Ordinance, 1992. If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and looks like a duck it must be a duck. If it has its own food preparation area, sleeping area, living area, and front door, as per the code requirements, it surely is an apartment. To coin a phrase, a rose by any other name is still a rose. We went to clot of trouble and expense over a long period of time to revise the zoning ordinance. We invoked such high and lofty phrases as, "to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the public", and to "implement the comprehensive plan of Roanoke County". Now, the ink is hardly dry, it has only been in effect since the beginning of 1993, and some of our deliberative bodies either don't know what it says or have chosen to ignore it. On the other hand, Mr. Cooper has to bear some of the responsibility since he holds himself out as a contractor. Surely he knows how these matters are to be handled in the field in which he specializes. One of the greatest pitfalls in allowing someone to run Willy nilly through the ordinance and then expect the county to grant an exception, or a variance, to fit the completed project is precedent. One of the underlying principles RC Board of Supervisors, February 2z, 1994 page 3 of American Law, and its antecedent English Law, is that of precedent. I think Mr. Mahoney will agree that many cases are either swayed by or decided on precedent, and setting a bad precedent leads to more bad de- cisions in the future. What can we do at this point? As I see it, our choices are four in number. They are: 1) Approve the project as it stands today and say our zoning ordinance means nothing. 2) Let Mr. Cooper either increase the square footage of the main dwelling or reduce the square footage of the apartment until he brings the ratio within the code requirements. In addition, move the front door to comply with the code. Leave the apartment kitchen as is since it is already plumbed and wired even though Mr. Cooper signed a State- went of Agreement on August 14, 1993, to have only one cooking facility or kitchen, and that it would be located in the main portion of the residence and not in the "guest cottage". 3) Continue this case until next month to give the county time to consider its options. 4) Deny Mr. Cooper's petition on the agenda tonight. Granted, these are tough choices and I don't envy your having to grapple with them. However, if we are going to hold ourselves up as anAll-American City/County then we must protect our integrity. Willis P. Lanier, Jr., DDS, PC 3611 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 ...ru.......~~~illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllll~llllll~illllllllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllillllllll~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~_ ~ c AGENDA ITEM NO. / 3 c c __ APPE CE REQUEST =_ - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ c SUBJECT: ~~~ a ~ ~=~ m~.~-- ~-- ~j ~~ l ~ ~ :- i~ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me Burin the g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five _ p g , minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ~_ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. -' ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BE HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c 11~IIIilllllilllllllllllllillillllllllilllllililliiillliillllllllliilillllllllllllllillillllllllilllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllll~ rr AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, FEBRIIARY 22, 1994 RESOLUTION 22294-10 AUTHORIZING RESCISSION OF OFFER TO PIIRCHASE 15 ACRES FROM FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION AS WELL A8 AIITHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 15 ACRES FROM THE HEIRS OF THE HINMAN ESTATE AND THE E%ECIITION OF A MODIFIED PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and, WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and, WHEREAS, the company desires to support these economic development efforts of the County and the Authority by relocating and establishing its corporate facilities in the County. WHEREAS, the County desires to support these economic development efforts of the Industrial Development Authority by donating public funds to the Industrial Development Authority in accordance with the provisions of § 15.1-511.1 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, on January 3, 1994, the Board appropriated and donated the sum of $272,500 to the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County for the purpose of acquiring 15 acres of real estate on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from the Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation; and, 1 WHEREAS, on January 11, 1994, the Board authorized and approved the execution of a Performance Agreement by the County Administrator with Hanover Direct. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. Requests that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County rescind its offer to purchase 15 acres on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation. 2. That the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County enter into a contract to purchase 15 acres on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from the Heirs of the Hinman Estate for $272,375. 3. That the modification and execution of a Performance Agreement with Hanover Direct, Inc. and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County for the relocation and establishment of certain industrial development facilities in Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved; and, all actions taken by the officers and agents of the County in connection with this transaction are ratified and confirmed. 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute said modified Performance Agreement on behalf of the County, upon form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: YY)c~.u,~-,~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Brian T. Duncan, Assistant Director, Economic Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 3 Item No . ~ '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to modify Performance Agreement with Hanover Direct, Inc., as well as to request the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) to rescind offer to purchase 15 acres from Friendship Manor Apartment Village and instead purchase 15 acres from the Heirs of the Hinman Estate COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In an effort to meet the needs of our client, Hanover Direct, the Department of Economic Development finds it necessary to request that the Board of Supervisors request the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) to rescind its offer to purchase 15 acres from the Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation and instead purchase 15 acres from the heirs of the Hinman Estate. This rescission is based on contingencies outlined in the Purchase Agreement. In addition, it will be necessary to make changes to the Performance Agreement that reflect this purchase. BACKGROUND: Hanover Direct announced its desire to locate a 500, 000 square foot warehouse and distribution facility on 53± acres on State Route 601. In addition, Hanover Direct instructed their engineers to design a facility that would accommodate an expansion area of 400,000 to 500,000 square feet on this site. Geotechnical studies indicate that a large deposit of bedrock just under the surface makes this expansion economically unfeasible. However, the purchase of the adjacent 15 acres owned by the heirs of the Hinman Estate instead of the 15 acres owned by Friendship Manor at the same price would allow the project to move forward. Hanover Direct intends to close on the purchase of 38 acres with Friendship Manor on February 24, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds were previously appropriated on January 3 and 11, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the IDA to rescind its offer to purchase 15 acres from the Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation. Authorize the IDA use of previously appropriated funds for this project for the purchase of 15 acres from the heirs of the Hinman Estate. Authorize the County Administrator and IDA to enter into a modified Performance Agreement with Hanover Direct. Respectfully submitted: Approved: --~"' ! c~ ~'. ~ ~, Brian` Duncan, Assistant Elmer C. Hodge Director of Economic Development County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RESCISSION OF OFFER TO PURCHASE 15 ACRES FROM FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION AS WELL AS AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 15 ACRES FROM THE HEIRS OF THE HINMAN ESTATE AND THE EXECUTION OF A MODIFIED PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and, WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and, WHEREAS, the company desires to support these economic development efforts of the County and the Authority by relocating and establishing its corporate facilities in the County. WHEREAS, the County desires to support these economic development efforts of the Industrial Development Authority by donating public funds to the Industrial Development Authority in accordance with the provisions of § 15.1-511.1 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, on January 3, 1994, the Board appropriated and donated the sum of $272,500 to the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County for the purpose of acquiring 15 acres of real estate on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from the Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation; and, WHEREAS, on January 11, 1994, the Board authorized and approved the execution of a Performance Agreement by the County Administrator with Hanover Direct. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. Requests that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County rescind its offer to purchase 15 acres on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation. 2. That the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County enter into a contract to purchase 15 acres on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from the Heirs of the Hinman Estate for $272,375. 3. That the modification and execution of a Performance Agreement with Hanover Direct, Inc. and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County for the relocation and establishment of certain industrial development facilities in Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved; and, all actions taken by the officers and agents of the County in connection with this transaction are ratified and confirmed. 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute said modified Performance Agreement on behalf of the County, upon form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. ACTION NO. A-22294-11 ITEM NUMBER --.Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 22, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for an Appropriation to Fund the Study of the Strategic Location and Replacement Policy for Fire and Rescue Equipment COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ( C•G^ ~l , BACKGROUND' As a part of the Vehicle Replacement Policy Study, the Board of Supervisors requested an evaluation of the replacement and strategic placement of Fire and Rescue equipment for the County. Staff has received a response to its request for proposal and is ready to award the contract to David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. in the amount of $10,000 plus out of pocket expenses for travel not to exceed $2,500. This firm and its staff has extensive experience in evaluating fleet composition and replacement programs and staff feels that they are competent to complete our study. By awarding the contract today,' the information will be available for use during the budget process. FISCAL IMPACT' This study was not budgeted in the operating budget and will require an appropriation of $12,500 from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the General Fund. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the appropriation of $12,500 from the Unappropriated Balance of the General Fund be approved so that the contract may be awarded and the study may be completed to allow the formation to be used in the budget process. Respectfully submitted, App o d by -~--~ John M. Chamb ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (X ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE MOtlon by: Harr~~ C' Ni r~kanc mnti pn NO YeS AbS to approve fundin fo $12,500 Eddy x from the Board Contingency Fund Johnson x instead of the Unappropriated Kohinke x Balance Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue O~ ROANp~~ L ti ~ z c~ z J _ ' a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 25, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Kenneth W. Lussen 3154-73 Betty Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Lussen: The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Grievance Panel. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for another two- year term. Your new term will expire on February 23, 1996. State 1.aw provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sinc ely, ~~ , ~~~ / Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bj h Enclosures cc: D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources \(\i\ I / V \ (~~ixxtt~ ~# ~Z o~~o ~e ® Recyded Paper O~ ROANp~,~ ~ ~ ~ A 2 ,(~ ~ 2 °v ,;,ate 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 25, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Roanoke Regional Airport 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 24012-1148 Dear Ms. Shuck: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 22294-1 approving the 1994-95 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, yr7 ~c~-~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council (~oixxt#~ ~~ ~.~~tx~.~~.e ®HeCyded Paper of ~~aNO~'F ~. z ~ ~' u as 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 25, 1994 Dr. Fred P. Roessel, Jr. Executive Director Blue Ridge Community Services 301 Elm Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24016-4026 Dear Dr. Roessel: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 This is to advise that at their meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to ratify the appointment of Mr. John M. Hudgins, Jr. as an at-large member of the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. Mr. Hudgins' term will expire December 31, 1996. On behalf of the supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please convey to Mr. Hudgins our sincere thanks and appreciation for his willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~~- mod. Q.Ltc-,~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh cc: Mr. John M. Hudgins, Jr. Clerk, Roanoke City Council Clerk, Salem City Council Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors Clerk, Vinton Town Council Clerk, Craig County Board of Supervisors (2~~~txt#~ of ~o~r~~~e ® Recyded Paper o~ aonNO,~~ ~ ~ A Z ~ J a2 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 25, 1994 Ms. Blanche Dooley 3490 Arthur Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Dooley: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Women of the Moose Chapter 1022 for a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the calendar year 1994. The raffles will be conducted at the location and dates specified in your application. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 3l OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, vita-u~-, ~ C~--ter-- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer C~o~ixxt#~ a~ ~.vr~rxto~e ® Recyded Paper O~ ROANp~,~ z ~ °v a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 25, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, $R., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Roanoke Regional Airport 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 24012-1148 Dear Ms. Shuck: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 22294-1 approving the 1994-95 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council C~~~rz~t~ ~# ~.a~x~o~~.e ®Recyded paper O~ FlOANp,~~ L ti' z ~ z °v `a• 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 February 25, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3550 Poplar Drive, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Dr, Nevling: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1994. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and fhe Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~.~..P P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 Sincerely, ~~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® Recydea Paper 2/14/94 Mary Allen Spencer Watts called and said that he needed to get approval for contract for North County Library on the 22nd. He is working on Board Report and Jyke Jones told him would have contract later this week. Request for Approval of Construction Contract for North County Library Brenda ~ ~ ANp~, F a. f- ~o z c~ 2 a s OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 February 11, 1994 Mary, Enclosed is an item for the February 22 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. If necessary, Mrs. Billie Reid will attend the meeting. Thank , Enclosures (2) c: Mrs. Billie Reid Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge Blue Ridge -- Community Services Rita J. Gliniecki Chairman Onzlee Ware vice Chairman John M. HUdgIr1S, Jf. Treasurer Pamela K. Cox Secretary Executive Director Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. ~P,, rna~ Q.~ February 4, 1994 Mr. Lee Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Eddy: At the February 3, 1994 meeting of the Board of Directors of Blue Ridge Community Services a resolution was passed to recommend Mr. John M. Hudgins, Jr. to fill an existing vacancy as an at-large member of the Board. The bylaws of the Board require that at-large members be recommended by the Board to the five participating localities. All five local governments must concur with the recommendation in order to confirm an appointment. Your attention to this matter will be very much appreciated. Sincerely, v~ ~ ~ L ~+--tiY,ZV`~ t~ Fred P. Roessel, Jr., P D. Executive Director FPRjr:cd C: John M. Hudgins, Jr. Rita J. Gliniecki Elmer C. Hodge EXECUTNE OFFICES - 301 Elm Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026 (703) 345-9841 Fax: p03) 342-3855 TDD: (703) 345-0690 Serving the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke N N N ~„ v V .A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ r.. N N ,.._, N W N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N ~ ~ ~ .t.. N 'A' .p .~' "'' ~ CD CJ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ,~„ ... C7 ~, x c~ a C O ~ o ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~o ~' as ~ o „~ cs ~ c'D '..' "" ~ '~ ~ N "'~ ~ O a ,^., 'fit (") ~ 0=. y '+ '~'] ~ D. .^. '7 (A ~.. `7 ~ .may. :y `q y ''~ ^ ~ C9 ~ ... .. ~ ~ ~ .fir (r U. .-. '~ _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N N O ~, N ~= ~`' C.~ C7 .t.. C7 ~ N ~ C7 p~ a~ o CMG' ~ o o`~ o ~ a'~ c'7 a~o C; =, ~ p ~ ~ c. ~ =~~ r ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ~' ~~ ~~° O ^ ~ C,.i ~ :. ^ rn ~ r. ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~? ~ ~ ~ O ... ... ~ ~ p ,,~ ~ ~' ~ , U-., ~ ~~ s ~ ~ ,~. ~ o - ~ O ~- ~ ~ co :-. .... m -+h ~.. C ~ ~ ... v. V w ~_ _ ~ o ~. to f~ ~~ r ~n~ .. as ~ ~ - y p co ~ _ =~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~. Oa p ~a O ~ ~: ~= r. n' oa ~ ~ oa h .o '" ~` - ~ ... ~ h n «y~j~1 11~~yy F7 sw ~ V ~ y m wa 0 Csl '~ '~„" O G; ,;.. ~F ROANp~.~ ~. ~~ °v a 7838 C~~ixx~~~ ~f ~.a~z~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 January 20, 1994 Mr. Thomas L. Robertson, President Carilion Health System and Co-Chair, New Century Council P. O. Box 13367 Roanoke, Virginia 24033 Mr. Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Director New Century Council P. O. Box 18084 Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Tom and Bev: ~~~ h ~~~. -~t ~~_ ~~ ~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Thank you both very much for accepting our invitation to attend a meeting of the Board of Supervisors to give them a presentation on the New Century Council and the Vison 2000 process. As I mentioned earlier, this was one of the topics discussed at the Board's recent planning retreat, and they are very interested in learning more than I was able to tell them. I, too, am looking forward to hearing you since I will not be able to attend either of the public meetings to be held January 25 and 26. This is to confirm that you will be attending the Board meeting that will be held on Tuesday, February 22, at 3 p.m. Don't forget our new location at 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W. (immediately behind the Shoney's Restaurant on Route 419). If you care to come a little early, I would be delighted to show you through the building. Thank you again. I really appreciate your taking the time to be with us. Very truly yours, ~:~ Elmer C. Hodge • County Administrator meh cc - Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors BRF ® Recycled paper a~ ROANp~~ ,w ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 0 2 a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 January 13, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HIL19 MAGISTERAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Director New Century Council P. O. Box 18084 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Bev: At their planning retreat on January 7, 1994, the Board of Supervisors expressed enthusiasm and interest in learning more about the New Century Council and the Vision 2000 process. Several Board members suggested that you and Tom Robertson be invited to attend a Board of Supervisors meeting and make a presentation on the Council and what we hope to accomplish. The Board of Supervisors meets on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. The meetings for the next two months are February 8, February 22, March 8 and March 22. I hope you and Tom can make arrangements to attend one of these meetings. Please let me know if you would be able to meet with the Board and which meeting date would be most convenient. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, >~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ma CC: Board Reading File ~rP ~ C~~~~~ ~'~ ~.~a~xx~.~a.~.~e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 ®Ae~ywa ~« LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Charles Cooper for a Special Use Permit for an accessory apartment, located at 4925 Bower Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 3, 1994 ~~~ ~ Q~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, February 8, 1994 Tuesday, February 15, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. HO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SOPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of A & M Enterprises LLC to rezone a 2.43 acre parcel from C-2C to C-2, to allow retail uses located at 4037 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 3 , 1994 ~ ~"~..c~2~~~• ~ ~ ;~cJ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, February 8, 1994 Tuesday, February 15, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: A&M Enterprises, LLC c/o Dennis Cronk, Agent 30 W. Franklin Road, Suite 800 Roanoke, VA 24011 (703) 982-2444 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham, filing jointly, to rezone approximately 1.5 acres from C-2C to C-2, located in the 6300 block on the south side of Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 3, 1994 ~•~~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, February 8, 1994 Tuesday, February 15, 1994 To be paid on delivery by: J. Edward Conner 6007 Buckland Mill Road, NW Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 366-5012 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 22th day of February, 1994 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: February 8, 1994 February 14, 1994 O~ ROANp~,~ ~~ . ~ ? ~~~n~ ~~ ~~~n~~ ~ a 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE February 4, 1994 Ms. Carol Hingular Roanoke Times & World News 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Carol: DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on February 8, 1994 and February 14, 1994. Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Sincerely, W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager ltm c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® Recyd•d Paper OF ROANp,I.~ ~, ; v a2 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE February 10, 1994 Ms. Carol Hingular Roanoke Times and World News Retail Advertising Division 201 W. Campbell Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Carol, . PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Proposed Tax Increase" advertisement for the County of Roanoke. Please publish this as a block ad on Tuesday, February 15, 1994. Bill the cost of publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Sincerely, ~a~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager C: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Miry Allen, ° Clerk to the Board. " Anne Marie Green, Community Relations C~~~rt~ ~~ ~~a~~~~~ DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® Regded Paper NOTICE OF PROPOSED TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. 1. Assessment Increase: Total assessed -value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by 2.51 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.10 per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke proposes to adopt a tax rate of $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the proposed rate would be $0.03 per $100, or 2.73 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. Z A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday, February ~, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. f"o ~aC. ~ rtnt Special Instructions This notice shall be at lease the size of one-eighth page of a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18-point. The notice shall not be placed in that portion, if any, of the newspaper reserved for legal notices and classified advertisements. I.~ This notice must be published on February.., 1994, and billed to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. O~ ~OANp,I.~ ~. ; Z .~ J "a2 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FlNANCE February 10, 1994 ~~a~n~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR PAUL f. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha, Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on February 15, 1994. Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Sincerely, ~.~~ 2~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager ltm c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator -Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2023 • FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® Re~yded Paper PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 22th day of February, 1994 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: Februar~,15, 1994 /~ ,,~ NOTICE OF PROPOSED ~-~~. "° ~ `'~i w1 TAX INCREASE ~~~ } proposes to increase property tax levies. r ,~J/_~,,<v ~" ~ , :ease: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional ~~~~ ~ new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total a~~~xu ~a,u~ .,~ real property by 2.51 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.10 per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke proposes to adopt a tax rate of $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the proposed rate would be $0.03 per $100, or 2.73 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Special Instructions This notice shall be at lease the size of one-eighth page of a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18-point. The notice shall not be placed in that portion, if any, of the newspaper reserved for legal notices and classified advertisements. This notice must be published on February 15, 1994, and billed to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge FROM: Mary Allen m ~ a~ DATE: January 13, 1994 SUBJECT: Board Meeting Schedule Work Sessions, Presentations, Etc. Listed below are the proposed work session dates that were set at the Planning Retreat on January 7. Also listed are the proposed budget work sessions and other presentations that are scheduled for the next several months. January 25 Work Session -Jail Feasibility Study Work Session -Budget Revenues Joint Work Session -School Board February 8 Work Session -Vehicle Replacement Policy Work Session -Budget Expenditures & Revenues, CIP February 22 Work Session -PTO Policy (Tentative) Presentation -Employee Service Awards and Reception March 8 Work Session -Utility CIP Work Session -Six Year Plan March 22 Work Session -Joint Budget Work Session with School Board April 12 Joint Work Session with Volunteer F&R Chiefs ril 26 Budget Work Session May 10 Affordable Housing After July 1 Facilities Use Policy Other Presentations and Work Sessions to Be Scheduled - Northside High School Field House - Bond Projects - Presentation by New Century Council CC: John Chambliss Don Myers 00 I~ tD M~ M O M ~ O r I~ N n N ~ W ELI N O r lD to 00 d' O M O 1~ O r ct O W lD o O O n M I~ O Q1 0 N~ fD N }: CL : ct Ql n O a N N 00 tD to ~ V N ~ N N M a Q1 f t[) T n N M 1~ N M 00 i~ W n W ~ QI ~~ r Q:i%... M M ~ (O N r 0 ~': ~: ~:i i t0 1~ N M tD t0 I~ ~ (D N In 00 M d' O r ~ d' N O O M r^ a r m V O o r ~- O If1 M O N O M M O T '~~ N 0 0 0 ~ d' N I~ 01 M M O M O In o N ~ M fV c0 M M 1~ f0 t0 00 N O r t~ r :-y O '51,* F cV M r t ^ ~'~ .< fD 1~ .O r M M n~ O T '" M O O M r fD M r In M tO M ct j ~ M M 'd: ~n N M N f0 0 1 N W (O N 1~ o O r N [C:I N r N r d' N O O N d' M r to tF '- P r a tF N N n N r O a r 0 n ~:: r ~. F-":r 0:; !< + T M ~I7 M 00 ^ N 0 N r N~ M N N~ M N r M M y. 5- M + ~ r a lM tll ct 0 0 !D ~ 0~ r OD 1~ O M ~. , ~ e...__. N N N e- P M O O r tp 00 00 m o"". k ~'`'' t : N N O~~ ~1 d' ct O M O O O M N V I~ N M e} ~ 00 O N cr Q1 fD O o M (O O [O ~V ~ o N ~ M M (O (p ~ r M M A O M d: ~1 N M r 0 ~ ~. O W.;.Q :.. N N N N O r lD t} tD 01 O O fD 1~ 01 M r OI w m N:>. I~ d' O M O M N ct 00 t0 fD 00 to M 00 lL1 V M N O (D f0 N M O O cf V' 00 o O fD ~D M N M o M N I~ O t0 I~ O r d' O E M M r 0 M r IC9 M O O f' ') O Q M M f`1 N 1~ N I~ M M to d' O~ O 00 r h r CG ~ ~f M N~ I~ ~ lf1 W O 1~ O N O f0 a n O r N M M N r OD l!f O ct N ch M N~ ~t1 d' I~ T~ O a ~ O t0 N O d' t0 O r M 0 N c} aj N In O M M r O V.:. W...: r N N r N~ r O N~ O O cD n a ~»> ~ :;: ;:;:::;:;:;:' M O r N O a r a n O n N O W E N n W O n O n M ti tD o O O 1~ M r o M ~~Z`:<%~:`:;~i r N O d' d' r O M ~i d: to l11 O~ cD M O ~ I~ M ~~ ~ ^ ~ N ~1::::: Q ~ r r r r N N M r n M N O tf r 00 O QI r O r `n O T Qf 0 M d; 1~ W M 0 O M N O N M O O N T N In O cf O r 00 fD ~ N f0 m O r a lfI O N T o [Y Q7 r O I~ O o O [t N 00 •. W ~ ~' O Ql N r a V r lD 00 r N N r l~ N 00 M ~- to M N 1~ !O 1~ O O r O O r O W . u- J d' O I~ r d' r N O O N M n f0 ~ V 00 ~ N N M fD tt ~ N d' 1~ c!' to d' r 1~ 1~ o O '~f ~f7 to ti 1~ o N ~"' n O' to I~ V n N N N to N N N N r M O ~"':~': N M N N O M r N M M 00 N o r O> W ~ r Cl tD to M 00 r N lI1 l+') 00 M O O t0 tfI 00 01 d' O ~ (O 0 lf7 cf T O tD N fD N M o M fD r d' U7 00 0 N O Y- 00 c0 c0 O 1~ N M r 00 O M 1~ N M O M N r r N ,m r r r N M r r r 1!1 r 1~ r 00 r 00 P 1~ n O 5 r Q Q W ~: U F" O M 00 r (D d' M N O d ' M t0 N W sT O O /0 ~ M r 1~ f0 O M r 1~ ~ M o M 1~ ~ n W 00 0 r f0 00 h-: Z; N~ I~ W <D ti r M M l!1 ~ ~ r N 00 O M O ~ r Z gQ:`: r r r N M~ d ' N M O ~ r r N O r O W r ~ w 0. 00 O N t0 00 In N fD N ~ to M M O N OD 00 W N N I~ O n In N O n r M M 00 I~ O r~ 0 M LL7 N o N I~ r M 1~ O o O W O I~ O N I~ ~ N W N M N lD E O ' ~ - fD O O O N (D 1~ n n M O ~ `~ r r N N r fD 1D I . ~ ~ N r ~ N cD 00 N t0 O N lf1 V' d ' ~ t0 1~ t f I~ W n r O n to d' 0 ~ N 00 l0 N o r I~ lD I~ m m 1~ ~ N l0 0 0 r N tf I r N M r N N !O N O 01 M r ~ N r ~ - Q r '7 In V M N d' c 0 ai c D In n ~O 1~ f0 r r 1~ W : ~ U o w Q Q W W 0 cW G LL U z a U. LL ~_ L •C Q ~LL LL E c 0 U Y d C :N C O N : 1~ r T 01 00 1~ M 00 N to P 00 ~ lf7 r M O I~ l0 O lD tP N V r T o O I~ W Q7 0 r N ~ •~ U ~ Z h cOD v i a .; N O Lfj N ~- {O ~ r IA ~ r tD B O O O ~ O O ~ Q 5 r ~ W ~ ~ ~ M LL ' '« : N Q :.:5. ::.::~ r 01 lD ti O tD M~ ' lD O Qf O P r lf1 ~ 00 n O N In ~ O 1!I N O M O e}' O O t0 o ~ O M~ d' 0 r M lD 7 C ~ ~Z::;~<;:;:;; O O V fD r tf ) f~1 r r r M M O r 00 r I 1 ~ N e u COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date red received applicat fe PC/BZ e• placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Workman Oil Company Phone: 703-586-83 Address: 828 Macon Avenue Bedford, VA Zip Code: 24523 Owner's name: At~"eY`~'``~ Phone: -A~sEa-Oil Company Inc. Address: Ba 1 t i more , MD Zip Code: Location of property: 419 Tax Map Number: ~ 7~ (3 _ c,- _,~, ) Corner of Electric Rd (RT and Brambleton Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): _ acres 25, 566 sq.ft. Existing Zoning: C-2 Existing Land Use: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Convenience store and gasoline outlet For srah` use on/y Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. us v Consultation Application Justification ws v ws v 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowled/g~e/and conse/n~t/of the owner. ,~ ~j ,1~ ~ Owner's Signature: v''~U/K ~ /,f*~ ~~r~/'(• ~N~r.~N~a,~--, i~iZw-...r ~A_ L1 For Staf/ Use On/y: Case Number Applicant Workman Oil Company The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. USe additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The location is closed at this time. We believe that our plans for reopening as a convenience store and retail gasoline marketing facility are consistent with the purpose of the zoning ordinance and the district classification in that these would expand the variety of commercial and service related activities in the area. In this C-2 area the quality products and services provided by the facility would add to the options afforded to motorists living within the district and to those who pass through. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The existing location, corner of Brambleton Avenue and RT 419 (Amoco Service Station), already conforms to the existing zoning ordinance. It has accessibility and is capable of handling high traffic volume. The facility will provide an additional retail outlet to serve the growing suburban population of Roanoke County. The Cave Spring area looks like it has expanded in every way in the last ten years. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Due to the fact that this facility is an existing one, the impact will definitely be positive, this location has been closed for approximately two years and does not enhance the community as is, we plan to hook-up to the water system as soon as possible. We further intend to be a good, responsible member of the community. \\\ ~ V y w ~ ".•i coot ~I i' C ~~ ~~ ~ ~ z d /' /.. ~ _ , f - ~ ~.: I :~ `rj,. 1~'j, ~ ~ -v/ + , >- t. ..~ •\` ~ _ H .p S . ` _ ~ I ~ ~, u 1 I ~ l _ '... ... ,. ~ - -~4 ~i ~~ !~s ` INS - r~- •. u: 11 ~~ r~ r~ z' :; IJi .. •- I ~ j s ~ i 'i k - ~ ~ I~i ~5.. '1 e • ~ ~ • 1 L. .: ;;. r d ~ - ~ , i. 1~ ~ ;\ . _• ~i 1 F u N '+ l\ _ r~^^ 'J.._. _ J i Check type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Rpq,upK~, C.ovnTY p/ANrvt~(a Cpmm /1'S/o~ Phone: r77,Z-,206$ Address: p O . a>3ox 2'1 B 0 O RQANO Ke. , V~0 ,2 yp/ ~ Zip Code: Owner's name: (,UE ~PS.f ~, L COr+-t p~0~ ~ Phone: 36.Z• 3 ~9S Address: ~,2,Z 3 RE.S ERvOiR RO RQ4N• V~0 Zi Code: p ayo~ ~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: ~ 7, O 8 . 3 ~ / 2 3 y S 6 Magisterial District: ~o//r,,,f Community Planning Area: /D~,cne~pt ~'ra.c.K Size of parcel (s): 3.6 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R- Existing Land Use: PRO~~.t. ~is7,Ru5c.Tim,y Proposed Zoning: s- ~ For Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: use Type; Proo~r D,s-ra,b~~•~~~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~_ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ......................................:................................... Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date eceived: received by: application fee: PC/6=A da e: 3-/ -~ placards issued: BOS date: -~2-95/ Case Number: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v Consultation Application Justification ws v 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Metes and bounds description ~ ~ Water and sewer application ws v Application fee ~ ~ Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and~onsent of the_ owner Owner's Signature: ROAHOZCE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date ~'~`qy Name of Applicant ~. G- ~).owin• ~,..,.,,•~ Phone 7 7z' Z OL Address of Applicant- P O J$O~ 29 $00 ~ /~i0 25'0!$ Name of Developer- ~~s~ ~. L ~p Phone 3~~379~ Address of Developer- g,Z,23 f~~JFQ~/Di2 Rip Name of Design Engineer /Vd"~'"~-~ Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person _ ~ui ~ /ylE,pgc3~r-' Name of ~~~d~ Development ~i~J~IS • ~• ~ CO . Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLANIMETRIC NUMBER): Paz 3 R~s~a vo, ~ loo Size of .~a~ development in acres: 3 •6 ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) '_~~ ' ~-.~- /.t/c~' Signa ure of pplican t 1 ~__ - Airport Commission Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Kit B, Kiser, Vice Chairman W. Robert Herbert H. Odell Minnix 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2-1 1 48 (703) 362-1999 FAX (703) 563-4838 Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director February 9, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Dear Gentlemen: RaANa~ REGIONAL aRPORr Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1994-95 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1994-95 proposed Operating and Capital Purchases Budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed S100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. very truly yours, t~ Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission CSp012894.h comm\94budget.ltr 28~1an-94 ATTACHMENTI PROPOSED FY 94-95 BUDGET 1993-94 Budgeted 1994-95 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Op erations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,409,901 $1,497,768 B. Operating Expenditures 1,147,230 1,118,060 C. City Services 621,000 609,000 D. Other Projects 38,000 78,000 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,216,131 3,302,828 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. Interest .594,218 583,766 B. Debt Service 288,976 288,976 Total Non•Operating 883,194 872,742 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Equipment 57,300 93,500 Total Capital Expenses 57,300 93,500 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,156,625 $4,269,070 1993-94 Budget 1994-95 Projected REVEtJUE PROJECTIONS Revenues Revenues 1. Op erating Revenues A. Airfield $843,657 $962,642 B. General Aviation 112,625 108,713 C. Terminal Related 2,935,382 2,973,371 D. Other Revenues 169,426 180,330 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,061,090 4,225,055 2. Non-Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 27,500 26,000 B. Interest on Investments 175,000 180,000 C. Roanoke County Base Service Fee 264,640 264,640 Total Projected Non-Operating Revenues 467,140 470,640 Total Projected Revenue _ $4,528,230 ~ $4,695,695 ATTACHMENT II PROPOSED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (For protects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods.) a PROJECTS: Installation of Additional Elevator in Terminal a. Description and Justification: The growing number of regional air carrier operations, the wide expanse of ramp used for loading and unloading passengers and the ADA have all combined to give rise to a need for an additional elevator in the terminal. This elevator would be built at the end of the concourse to meet the needs of a growing number of passengers. b. Rough Estimate of Cost: 5200,000.00 2. Purchase Snow Removal Equipment a. Description and .justification: Having finally experienced a more normal winter and while developing an FAA requested snow plan, it has been determined the airport could be opened more quickly and safely main- tained in a more efficient manner if the following pieces of equipment were purchased: i. Dumptruck with sand spreader and blade; ii. High speed snowbroom with blade; iii. Three replacement plow blades; iv. Chemical spreader truck. b. Estimated Cost: $430,000.00 (S70,000 truck with sand spreader, S250,000 snowbroom, S10,000 blades, and S100,000 chemical dispenser truck.) 6. FUNDING SOURCES: Federal Airport Improvement Program Grant Funds S567,000.00 Commonwealth Aviation Grant Funds 31,500.00 Commission Funds 31,500.00 City and County Funds 0.00 $630,000.00 T H ~E A M E R I C A N I N S T I T U T E O F A R C H I T E C T S t'd .. ATTACHMENT A AIA Document A101 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a STIPULATED SUM 1987 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. The 1987 Edition ojA/A Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use tnith other general conditions unless this document is modified. This document has been approved and endorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America. AGREEMENT made as of the Twenty-Third day of February in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Four BETWEEN the Owner: County of Roanoke 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. Roanoke, Virginia, 24018 and the Contractor: R. L. Lucas Construction, Inc. 2030 Shenandoah Valley Avenue Roanoke, Virginia, 24012 The Project is: Additions and renovations to the Roanoke County Library Hollins Branch The Architect is: Jones & Jones Associates, Architects PC 6120 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia, 24019 The Owner and Contractor agree as set forth below. Cop}•right 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, ©1987 b}• The American Institute of Archi- tects, 1735 New York Avenue, N.Vf'., Washington, D.C. 20006. Reproduction of the material herein or substantial quotation of its provisions without written permission of the AIA violates the copyright laws of the United States and will be subject to legal prosecution. AIA DOCUMENT A101 • OR'NER•CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT • TV~'ELFTH EDITION • AIA • ©198 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW PORK A~'ENCE, N.vG'„ Vt•ASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 At ~~.~ 987 ARTICLE 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contrac[ Documents consist of this Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents listed in this Agreement and Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement; these form the Contract, and are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached to this Agreement or repeated herein. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parries hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than Modifications, appears in Article 9. ARTICLE 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT The Contractor shall execute the entire Work described in the Contract Documents, except to the extent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of others, or as follows: None ARTICLE 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 3.1 The date of commencement is the date from which the Contract Time of Paragraph 3.2 is measured, and shall be the date of this Agreement, as first written above, unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fixed in a notice to proceed issued by the Owner. Unless the date of commencement is established by a notice to proceed issued b}' the Owner, the Contractor shall notifi• the Owner in writing not less than five days before commencing the Work to permit the timely filing of mortgages, mechanic's liens and other security interests. 3.2 The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work not later than 31 August 1994 subject to adjustments of this Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents. AIA DOCUMENT A101 •OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT • TWELFTH EDITION • AlA® • ©1987 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 A101-1987 Z ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT SUM 4.1 The Owner shall pay the Contractor in current funds for the Contractor's performance of the Contract the Contract Sinn of NINE HUNDRED THIRTY ONE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE Dollars (f 931 , 875.00 ), subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Con- tract Documents. 4.2 The Contract Sum is based upon the following alternates, if any, which are described in the Contract Documents and are hereby accepted by the Owner: Base Bid and Addendum Number 1 $866,200.00 Addendum Number 2 $ 65,675.00 4.3 Unit prices, if any, are as follon•s: Cubic yard of concrete $120.00 Type A concrete masonry unit $ 5.00 Cubic yard of rock removed $ 50.00 AIA i~UMENT A101 • OVCNER~CONTRACI'OR AGREEFIENT • TVC'ELFTH EDITION • .41A' • ~ 19A7 THE AMERICAN IN~TITCTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1715 NEVC PORK A~'ENl'E, N Vt'., V('ASIIINGTON, D.C. 2~nxK~ A101-1987 3 ARTICLE 5 PROGRESS PAYMENTS 5.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. 5.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month, or as follows: Each period shall end on the twenty-fifth day of the month. 5.3 Provided an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than the Twenty-fifth (25th) da}• of a month, the Owner shall make payment to the Contractor not later than the Fifteenth (15th) day of the fOllOWirigmonth. If an Application for Pa}•ment is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment shall be made by the Owner not later than Twenty (20 ) days after the Architect receives the Application for Pa}'ment. 5.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based upon the Schedule of Values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Schedule of Values shall allocate the entire Contract Sum among the various portions of the Work and be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect ma}• require. This Schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor's Applications for Pa}•ment. 5.5 Applications for Payment shall indicate the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered b}• the Application for Pa}~ment. 5.6 Subject to the provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress pa}'ment shall be computed as follows: 5.6.1 Take that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to completed Vt'ork as determined by multipl}•ing the percentage completion of each portion of the Work b}• the share of the coca] Contract Sum allocated to that portion of the V('ork in the Schedule of Values, less retainage of Flve percent ( 5 %). Pending final determination of cost to the Oa•ner of changes in the Fork, amounts not in dispute may be included as provided in Subparagraph 7.3.7 of the General Conditions even though the Contract Sum has not }'et been adjusted b.• Change Order; 5.6.2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable t0 materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance b}• the O~•ner, suitabl}• stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of Five percent ( 5 %)~ 5.6.3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and 5.6.4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Architect has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Pa}•ment as provided in Para- graph 9.5 of the General Conditions. 5.7 The progress pa}•ment amount determined in accordance with Paragraph 5.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances: 5.7.1 Add, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to One hundred percent ( 100 %) of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Architect shall determine for incomplete Work and unsettled claims; and 5.7.2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereaher materiall}• dela}•ed through no fault of the Contractor, an}• additional amounts pa}•able in accordance with Subparagraph 9.10.3 of the General Conditions. 5.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: None AIA WGUMENT A701 • OV('NER-CONTRACTOR AGREEAfENT • TV~'ELFTH EDITION • AIAe • Ciiy8' THF. ADIERICAN INSTITCTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1'35 NEB(' YORK A\'ENCE, ti.VC'., Vi'ASHINGTON, D.C. 2o(IW A101-1987 4 ARTICLE 6 FINAL PAYMENT Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when (1) the Contract has been fully performed by the Contractor except for the Contractor's responsibility to correct nonconforming Work as provided in Subparagraph 12.2.2 of the General Conditions and to satisfy other requirements, If any, which necessaril}> survive final pa}•menr and (2) a final Certificate for Payment has been Issued by the Architect; such final payment shall be made by the Owner not more than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect's final Certificate for Payment, or as follows: ARTICLE 7 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 7.1 Vt~here reference is made in this Agreement to a provision of the General Conditions or another Contract Document, the ref- erence refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions of the Contract Documents. 7.2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated belo~•, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. Ten per cent (10%) per year compounded monthly. 7.3 Other provisions: All changes in the contract which involve additional charges in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($10,000.00) shall be approved by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 8.1 The Contract may be terminated by the On•ner or the Contractor as provided in Article ly of the General Conditions. 8.2 The ~t~ork may be suspended by the O~-ner as provided in Article 14 of the General Conditions. AIA DOCUMENT A101 • O~('NER-COnTRACTOR AGREE~fEXT • TVCELFTH EDITION • AIA' • 6198' THE AMERICAN INSTITCTE OFARCHITECTti, 1'i5 NE~i' PORK A\'ENCE, N.Vi'., Vi'ASHINGTO\. D.C. ZOO1K' A1~1.1987 5 ARTICLE 9 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.1 The Contract Documents, except for Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated as follows: 9.1.1 The Agreement is this executed Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor, AIA Document A 101, 1987 Edition. 9.1.2 The General Conditions are the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A201, 1 g87 Edition. 9.1.3 The Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract are those contained in the Project Manual dated 15 November 1993 ~ and are as follows: Document Title Pages A Invitation for Bid 2 B Form of Proposal 2 D Bid Bond (AIA Document A310) 1 E Performance and Payment Bond (AIA Document A312) 6 F List of Drawings 1 1.1 Supplemental Conditions 6 1.2 Scope of Work 1 9.1.4 The Specifications are those contained in the Project Manual dated as in Subparagraph 9.1.3, and are as follows: Section ~ D].v1SlOn Title Pages 2 3 Site Work 25 Concrete 6 4 Masonry 2 5 Metals ~ 6 Carpentry 5 ~ Moisture, Protection ~ 8 Doors 13 9 Finishes 15 10 Specialties ~ 15 Mechanical 35 16 Electrical 8 Appendix A Abbreviations 17 Appendix B Finish Schedule 2 Appendix C Door Schedule 2 Appendix D Window Schedule 1 Appendix E Symbols Used on Drawings 2 Appendix F Legends of Materials Used on Drawings 1 AIA DOCUMENT A101 • OV(`NER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT • TVi'ELFTH EDITION • AIAR • ©19H' THE AMERICAN INSTITCTE OF ARCHITECTS, I i35 NE~Y' PORK AVENUE, N.~Y'., Vt'ASHINGTON, D.C. 20000 Al ~1-1987 s 9.1.5 The Drawings are as follows, and are dated 15 NOVember 1993 unless a different date is shown below: Number ~ Latest Revision Tide Date C1 Cover Sheet Site Dimensional Layout 8 Feb 94 C2 C3 Site Grading & Site Utilities 8 Feb 94 8 Feb 94 Site Details L1 Landscaping Plan L2 Landscaping Plan S1 Footing & Foundation Plan S2 Roof & Framing Plan S3 Miscellaneous Details B1 Floor Plan B2 Demolition Plan B3 Exterior Elevations B4 Reflected Ceiling Plan BS Buildings Sections B6 Wall Sections B7 Wall Sections B8 Wall Sections B9 Miscellaneous Details B10 Miscellaneous Details B11 Frame Details B12 Case Work B13 Roof Plan M1 HVAC Diagram M2 HVAC Diagram P1 Plumbing Supply Diagram P2 Plumbing Drainage Diagram E1 Electrical Lighting Diagrams E2 Electrical Power Diagram E3 Site Electrical Diagram 9.1.6 The Addenda, if any, are as follows: Number Date Pages 1 7 January 1994 21 2 8 February 1994 2 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. AIA DOCUMENT A/01 • OWNER•CON7'RACTOR AGREEMENT • Tvl'ELFTIi EDITION • AIA~ • ©1987 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEVI' PORK AVENUE, N.VI'., Vt'AStIINGTON, D.C. 2(KN1C, /!\~ ~~.~ 987 7 9.1.7 Other documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are as follows: None This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above and is executed in at least three original copies of which one is to be delivered to the Contractor, one to the Architect for use in the administration of the Contract, and the remainder to the Owner. OWNER Roanoke County CONTRACTOR R. L. Lucas Construction, Inc. (Sig~tature) (Signature) AIA DOCUMENT A101 •OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT • TWELFTH EDITION • A!A® • ©1987 THE AMERICAN INSTITI,'TE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., VG'ASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 Al ~1-1987 8 j L i ~ i= ~ ~ r'~ ~ i= c1 ` s= ~.i ~ i\i -T d. ~i i-`~ c~_ ~ ~ T i ~i ivi E=-. i\i i ~ _-~-- i~:.-_ -- dC;=,rt~t~•T d'\.i d C "ir ti^ _ _ anc rr.-c ~cTn r,av _ r- ~ i-- ~ ~'~-i n1: :nr't -- 'l.:~IJGIIr' I G r'r^ - _ - ---_-- nr-c~c r,c _ina:-t=r rG ,=.rrG n ac Tnc. tGl/ T1! !- Ti^ T'rC' na- Tr !-: ~I.i-^.'i.; f-1 \I' rL~/TCne~ \ ice "Id° -I:: . . . .ei F- .^tl ~\I''/ \/_ I:_ _ Y1G rG',na~'"Gr ~- .-Jf. -. _ 'r-t^.~-^(: rl~"' T71 .^.. C.^_.^^,nr' nq^ ?" ^I~:_Fr.I^_ -.Y_ ~ II" \/ dri .CT rat -.r nT 1-'^,a!'1(lkII l^.rI_nT.`,~_ \iTi{~'T'_ d narrV nr me T n ~ rn Harr • W T ti r= C~ ~ T ;a - TL+GT ~=:"1P dN'; T1V -'('Iiv~Ti'~~dT-^:i,: r,= trc mi-rt!ta i ncnGfii- - ar-rll- =t•;G ^:c•.,a Inr~r ri cc n,?rGry -~dt`li r T `iG dGCTr_;~I deli. Tk ^~IC~=~A \.;- '~ ri-:G ^•i•,.ana^-c (:~t\i~! ;,yd,N?,1",ITV ('t s= iTT!--, in -- c-nni- r;ntn t'r~G R•-ar,~ ail ,;atcr ar.r„rr cc;.;c~ ,l ircc_ •.:p i1iGC. TiTT'1nnC iatcr - ==. -- _-, __ _ -- ~nncrrir,nc cr-;rar_,G ra-;i~tia_ c^II'"-- r, r" wa=_cr cl:rn?•,, nunnc manhr,icc an;; an•.~ anri i ntrcr ^I:inmIIri- ar,r ann;Ir~cr.-anrac ~i~.a- Ins.-, i ar,n i'~ .. _ :arc n,^ %rr „\„cr c~./c'-Grc i ~c ct -c 1.,I.^. i - `./ ~.,'a"Gr ^r cn\•:G-- =mc _ _.. _ ir,a+ 'r -. .. -v n.~,'-,c.-- _ l C r n 1"1 ` t '7 G 1 1 C ~ : t T - - -- :1~ r-.. !'"^ _ r _ _ \~ 'C'r ETC- r.a-cr, rG^t ;"if- ~ _ _ _ .,/ _-...__ -- i -- ~ - .= Imo' -=- ~ -_ ----- - ~,r' ^i - - -r ~- ^1: - -;vi Grir_ _' _ _ ,-n- 1 !lr '{ i rn - r, - r '-nn rrr, - - - ..rte _ - _ .t +n.:. ~ -a.~r ; ~~ mot-: c - - -- i _ ~r -n _ - . -. - - _ -. -,ii clan- ,~ - ~ in_n .: a r n n P p _ _ h ~ i=c - _ _ -.-'- /I ~ +-~_... _......... v _____ ,t-. ~.` n - i . ,~ nr • ------------ _ ~ ~ ---- - ' - , -- -- 'r ~ _ :.. ^.r rr.' ran - _, T.~ ~_k ^G ~G .~13 _ _ -na`' nn _r, .i^?'r' of .~ - - : - _. :. T_.. -~..._ - -__ _ _~ n,.,. ~ ._.. - __,_ _ - 1 r~; \ir,-in-a F; 1; G I mC r ^,fi ^ - - - G . ^.i. ref ~' 'TV -___ ~ ~ ~'~ ; 1 ~' I 1 ~ 1 - ~ . `. 1. r Ili'1Gr _ = 4:.^.^•(`7~ i- .r ,_ _.___ _I_.-_-._ _ _-^. I., -_ Pi Y? I- ~:'1T T:~ F: ,-.7 ." - \" ~.r.:l C" C S'. •.; i nrimiccir,n .n~~nircc• R: or ,I~ f. '~:' ~'anc n= ; L .," ~.~ DEED OF= EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 2 day of Octoher _, 1992, by and between: J.C. Gravbill hereinafter referred to as the "Developer, " party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COl1NTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is mare particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Hamaden Hills - SPCtion 4 made by _ T.P. Parker & Son and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 F The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water andlor sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adapted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FALLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: LT e. ~Q_A~,ILC. ~a~t/ ~~`~~~~~~ ~ By: r/ "G By: "C As: - (~ W NFL, State of : U~ ~Z6 i County/~t~- of: dlkN ot,~ ~_ to wit: ~ foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of _ ~ C.-I'~k9'E.~ 19 `~~ , By: 'T~ C. GQ-~(~y)Li. as 6w n~e~. Duly authorized officer Title 111' on behal f of ~ ~ C ~ G Q-AH (cg! L(, !7 c~ YYt. ~G ~ (,:, f 1 t o~Q~-~ / hr ~ Notary Public My Commission expires: o~'~~-~`1~ Page 2 of 3 e A Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney By Elmer C. Hodge State of: County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer G. Hodge, Gounty Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Revised 10/16/90 Page ?'of 3 RE~I.~EST FOR FINAL INSPECTION December 20, 1993 DATE (Type all infarmatian) Mr. P.rnold Cavev Department of Engineering & Inspections Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va 24018-0798 Dear Arnold: Mr. J.C. Gravbill hereby requests a final inspection of the public facilities .constructed in Hampton Hills - Section 4 as shown on plans prepared by T.P, Parker & Son plan or project # 90-SB-00899 and approved by Roanoke County on September 27, 1990 Ws request that we be present during the inspection far completion of the above faci 1 i ti es . Name and mailing address of developer: Mr. J.C. Gravbill 4027 Pebble Drive, S.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Contact .person and telephone number: Mr. J.C. Gravbill (703) 427-0155 See attached letter Signature of Owner/Principal ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- FOR USE BY ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date request received: December 20, 1993 Date final inspection completed: The referenced facilities meet the requirements for acceptance by Roanoke County: . ~ ~~ Signat e a oke County En ineering Department ate The contractor for the above facilities is: E.C. Pace