Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/12/1994 - RegularF PpANp~F~ ~~ ~ " o , 9 ~~ ~~ z ~ ~~~~ Z (~ ~ a OJ 1838 BOARD OF S~ER~SORS ROANOI~ COUNTY AGENDA Ap~I,12,1994 ~~~~~ R. . m m~~g Regular of SuPetv~s° ~ at 3:00 Board Tuesday ~ the Roanoke CO and Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday of each Welcome held on the see the ~ WILL held at 7:00 p.m on meetings arc hearings are ule will be a~°Onc~ p~~LpOSE OF P•m~ pubh sON App' 12 FOR THE month. Deviations from this ~~,~~r_ SESSION BE ~ ~v~l.~~.~ BUDGET WORK SESSIONS. ial arrangeme~ in or ~ eetings or other uo ~ o~~ervisors e disabilities ~eA qB lease contact ~ IndMduals with a in or b Roanoke ~~~~ Pro~de at least 48- order tOS~a~ c~eS ~nS 2005- yye request prog~n'' ~ 703) ~ be made. ClerK to the Bso ~~ Proper arrdngeme~s maY hours nonce P.M•) pENIlVG CEREMO~S (3:00 A, O 1. Roll Call. The Reverend Kenneth Stofft avocation: d of Nazareth Catholic Church 2. I Our La y e fiance to the United States Flag• 3, Pledge of All g ® Recycled Paper c-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TH ROB~O ~ CFOUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE APRIL 12, 1994 ON TUESDAY, PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATIONDEC~gINGPAPRIL ipFET16DI1994CHERg OF ROANORE COUNTY AND pg PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMIINICATORS WEER WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers of Roanoke County are responsible for ensuring that all calls for assistance are promptly answered and properly dispatched; and WHEREAS, the police, fire and emergency medical services personnel would be unable to perform their duties without the work of the Public Safety Dispatchers; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers also perform non- emergency services for the County, such as those related to utility operations, highway safety and the work of federal, state, and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers work through all types of emergency situations, including floods and blizzards, often having to neglect their own homes and families to ensure that citizens is protected; and the safety of Roanoke County WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers work to improve the emergency response capabilities of these communications systems through their leadership and participation in training programs and other activities; and WHEREAS, the week of April 10 - 16, 1994 has been designated as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week to honor and recognize the vital contributions made by the Public Safety Dispatchers to the safety and well-being of all citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of its citizens, does hereby express its deepest appreciation for the c- ~ services provided by the Public Safety Dispatchers; and FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the week of April 10 - 16, 1994 as PpBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEER in Roanoke County. C~ . c~``' AT A REGIILAR MEETING OTHEHROANORE COIINTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COIINTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 RESOLIITION 4141 BERVICEATORTHEACOUNTY TOF ROANORE W• RICHARDSON FOR WHEREAS, Harold W. Richardson has served as a member of the Board of Equalization since January 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, Mr. Richardson also served on the Board of Zoning Appeals from June 1988 through June 1993; and WHEREAS, from 1988 through 1990, Mr. Richardson served on the Roanoke County Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee (LCAC), a committee that dealt with the siting of a landfill and establishing rules and regulations for its operation; and WHEREAS, the LCAC was the recipient of state and national awards for encouraging citizen involvement in this emotional and controversial issue, serving as a model for future landfill sitings; and WHEREAS, Mr. Richardson devoted many hours of dedicated service to the citizens of Roanoke County through his membership on these committees and his service as vice chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby express its sincere appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to HAROLD W. RICHp,RDSON for his dedicated service to the Board of Equalization, the Board of Zoning Appeals, and the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~, J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File ~_~ AT A REGIILAR MEE'TD AT THEHROANORE COIIN,I,YEADMINISTRATION CENTER COIINTY,VIRGINIA, HEL 1994 ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 12, RESOLIITION OTO THECOIINTY OF ROANORE W. RICgARDSON FOR HIS SERVICE WHEREAS, Harold W. Richardson has served as a member of the Board of Equalization since January 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, Mr. Richardson also served on the Board of Zoning Appeals from June 1988 through June 1993; and WHEREAS, from 1988 through 1990, Mr. Richardson served on the Roanoke County Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee (LCAC), a committee that dealt with the siting of a landfill and establishing rules and regulations for its operation; and WHEREAS, the LCAC was the recipient of state and national awards for encouraging citizen involvement in this emotional and controversial issue, serving as a model for future landfill sitings; and WHEREAS, Mr. Richardson devoted many hours of dedicated service to the citizens of Roanoke County through his membership on these committees and his service as vice chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby express its sincere appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to HAROLD W. RICHARDSON for his dedicated service to the Board of Equalization, the Board of Zoning Appeals, and the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee. ~~_ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD TIIESDAY,OAPRIL 12UN 1994DMINISTRATION CENTER ON PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 16 - 23, 1994 AS NATIONAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT WEER WHEREAS, America faces many challenges now and in the future, and meeting those challenges successfully lies with county governments -- the governments of the future; and WHEREAS, County governments are committed to stopping unfunded mandates, which are depleting local revenues and causing local services to be cut back; and WHEREAS, County governments are leading the fight to end violence and reduce crime through programs, policies and the National Association of Counties' Children's Initiative Task Force, which is pursuing solutions to help our nation's troubled youths; and WHEREAS, County governments are using technology and innovation to tackle the nation's problem; and WHEREAS, County governments are flexible and adaptable in providing services directly to the people and are able to provide county-wide and regional solutions to problems; and NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of the contribution made and the leadership offered by our nation's counties, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby proclaim the week of April 16 - 23, 1994, as NATIONAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT WEER in Roanoke County, Virginia. C-~ AT A REGULAR MEETIN AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRAT ON CE ER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD 1994 ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 9, 1994 AS TOUR DIIPONT DAY IN ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Tour DuPont is the Premier Cycling Event in North America with professionals from throughout the world competing; and WHEREAS, the 1994 Tour DuPont will offer the toughest course to date, traveling through Delaware, Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina; and WHEREAS, the Tour DuPont will appear in the Roanoke Valley for its very first mountain time trail, testing each individual rider's ability to cross a course in the fastest time possible; and WHEREAS, the majority of the time trial will take place on roads in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Tour DuPont events scheduled in the Roanoke Valley are the culmination of the hard work and dedication of many individuals, local government officials, sponsors and volunteers; and WHEREAS, this world class sporting contest will bring to Roanoke County positive publicity, an economic benefit of $1.5 Million, and pride in our locality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County on its own behalf and on behalf of its citizens does hereby proclaim May 9, 1994, in Roanoke County as TOUR DUPONT DAY; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors wishes the sponsors and cycling participants in the Tour DuPont a safe and very successful competition, and offers its congratulations to those who worked to bring the event to the Roanoke Valley. ~II~YXCt~ II~ ~II?X~II~tE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA ApRII,12,1994 FI.oOR. Regular Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Su th fourth e'l~esday at 3:00 meetings are held on the second 'I~aesday and ,m, public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth 1~iesday of each P month. Deviations from this_ schedule will be ~~~ ncedF pi~~ E OF BUDGET WORK SESSIONS. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to pa ipat rvisors meetings or other rtic a in or attend Board of Sups lease contact the programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, p Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005- We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that Proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. 2. Roll Call Irnocation: The Revere Nazareth Catholic Church Our Lady ® Retycied Paper 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B, REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C, PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS 1, Proclamation Declaring the Week of lpril 10 - 16, 1994 as Public Safety Telecommunicators Wee HCN MOTION TO ADOPT PROC. URC -- ~_^, c~.,,v..s s y~ - - MCIAUGHI.IN AND DUSTIN CAMPBELL 2. Resolution of Appreciation Service to Roanoke County. R-41294-1 BL~T MOTION TO ADOPT URC ACCEPTED BY MR. RICHARDSON to Harold Richardson for his 3, Proclamation Declaring the Week of April 16 - 23, 1994 as National County Government Week. FM MOTION TO ADOPT PROC URC ACCEPTED BY ELMER HODGE 4, Proclamation Declaring May 9, 1994 as Tour DuPont Day. HCN MOTION TO ADOPT PROC URC a ACCEPTED BY BRIAN DUNCAN 5, Introduction of New Utility Director ECH INTRODUCED GARY ROBERTSON D, NEW BUSINESS 1, Request for Approval of Lease PnurcSchoolsf Hom~ Management Program for the Cou ty Duff, School Director of Facilities and Operations) AYES-HCN NAYS BLJ F-r= -FM•LBE WITHDRAWN 1'l~a a~:~ ~--- AT 8 A.M. FOR WORK SESSION - L1W Z, Request to Accept Funds from the Compensation Board for a Corrections Officer Position. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) A-41294-2 HCN MO'T'ION TO ADOPT URC 3, Request for Approval to Remove the Cap on the Sheriff s Subfund. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) A-41294-3 URC RAISED AND HOW IT WAS SPENT. 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUP Y ADMINISOTRATIONO LATER TY~ VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Lease Purchase of Energy Management Program for the County Schools COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Experience in the County has been good. Uur rerords show that the County saved 515,000 in the 10 County buildings from September through November. RecommendApproval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In May 1993, we enhool buildin snand ten1County buildings~lAs install Energy Management equipment in twenty-three Sc g an addendum to this contract, the County Schools would like to add the installation of Energy Management equipment in fifteen additional School bhooingwhenl iding convertedeint ~thea S hool upgrades at the Roanoke County Occupational Sc 128 659. Administration Building. The total cost of this equipm savm son each building which swill offset the Johnson Control guarantees a certain amount of energy g cost of the annual lease payments and the annual maintenan~hp as menu JThis equipment willtbe energy savings are not realized, Johnson Control will mak p Y lease/purchased over a ten year period. Attached is a schedule showing the School building includeWOrkdthat will behperformed:performed at each building. Following is an explanation of the type o Windows -Enclosure of some with Dryvit and over glazing (storm window technique) for most of the remaining. Lighting -Replacement of some fixtures, upgrade of some with reflectors, replace some old ballasts with energy efficient ballasts, and replace old bulbs with energy efficient bulbs. Boiler Efficiency -Calibrations of combustion units, adjustment of other controls. Replacement of Mechanical Equipment -This wooly These units are ast old asdthe school and located at the Roanoke County Occupational Sch are not energy efficient or sized for the new use of the space. ~~ Facility Management Systems -This replaces or addbe onitored form aocentral locate on -Our systems in each school and enables this equipment to Maintenance Department. The School Board approved the award of the contract for thBeos~chdoal bovaingsneeded tto enter int a their meeting on March 10, 1994. However, the County PP lease\purchase agreement for the equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: The County Schools will make the ldeaeet payment with savings that they realize in their utility budget, and additional funds from their b g STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Board of SunervS hoolpthe Board w 11 needho approve the to the existing Johnson Control Contract for the Co y attached reimbursement resolution so that the County staff can proceed with the financing of this equipment. Respectfully submitted, Homer Duff Director of Facilities and Operations Roanoke County Schools VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved Motion b () y' Eddy - - Denied () Johnson - Received () Kohinke - Referred O Minnix - To () Nickens - - - AT A REGULAR MEETING O T HE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMI ISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring certain equipment for the County consisting of an Energy Management System to be installed at various County School buildings ("Equipment") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of acquiring the Equipment from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Equipment is $1,130,000. 3 The Board of Supervisors determines that the financing of the acquisition of the Equipment pursuant to one or more agreements providing for the leasing of the Equipment by the County from one or more lessors (collectively, the "Lease") is in the best interest of the County and the lease financing of the Equipment is authorized. The maximum aggregate amount of the principal components of the Lease shall be $1,130,000 plus an amount sufficient to pay the costs incurred by the County in connection with the financing or financings and to fund any required reserves. The Director of Finance and the County Administrator are authorized to select a lessor or lessors and to execute and deliver on behalf of the County an appropriate Lease or Leases and such other documents, agreements and certificates as may be necessary to complete the lease financing. 4 The County Administrator, the Director of Finance and such officers, agents and employees of the County as either of them may direct are authorized and directed to prepare any and all instruments, opinions, certificates and other documents necessary to carry out the purposes of this Equipment and all such action previously taken is ratified and confirmed. 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. A-41294-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~ " AT A REGULAR ELD AT THE ROANOKE R OUNTY ADMINISOTRATION OCENOTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Emergenc Roanoke County/Salem1Ja ilCompensation Board for the COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Virginia Compensation Board approved one emergency funded corrections officer position due to overcrowding in the jail for the Roanoke County/Salem Jail for the FY 93-94. I request the Board of Supervisors accept funds in the amount of $14,811.02 and credit that amount to the Sheriff's Office payroll account. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: only, and it is not known in FY 94-95. The position 1993. FISCAL IMPACT: None This position was funded for one year at this time if it will be funded again was filled on a temporary basis in July, ALTERNATIVES: By the end of FY 93-94, the funds will have been absorbed in the General Fund and not credited to the Sheriff's Office budget, as the County will have received $14, 811.02 from the Compensation Board for this position. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of request. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Gerald S. Holt El r C. odg Jr. Sheriff County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- VOTE Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Gerald S. Diane D. D. Keith ACTION Motion by: ~~rrv C Ni~kens_ Holt, Sheriff Hyatt, Director, Cook, Director, No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x Finance Human Resources A-41294-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Proposal to remove the cap on the Sheriff's subfund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ BACKGROUND: As a result of the new accounting practices suggested by the Auditor of Public Accounts to Virginia Sheriffs in 1993, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved at the April 27, 1993, meeting the establishment of the Sheriff's subfund for the reallocation of fees collected to the Sheriff's account without additional actions by the Board of Supervisors. At the time of this proposal, it was estimated that the revenues collected would be approximately $40,000 annually. However, after one year's experience we find it difficult to project the amount we will collect due to the inmate population changes. The fees are statutorily designated for inmate care and programs under Code Sections 53.1-27, 53.1-131, and 53.1-131.1. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: I request the Board of Supervisors remove the cap of $40,000 and designate this account not to be expended beyond the amount of fees collected. This will enable us to comply with the Auditor of Public Accounts' suggested practices and the statutes that cover the fees. FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: When fees collected reach the cap, the additional fees collected will have to be placed in the General Fund and the jail would lose the revenues for the maintenance of the inmates, which would not be in compliance with the above-mentioned Code Sections. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of request. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Gerald S. Holt Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Sheriff County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve reciuest VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance A-41294-4 ACTION NO . ~- ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE B RE COUNTY UADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANO MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 noke to AGENDA ITEM: for Damages During Storm Designation of Agent for County of Roa Obtain Federal and State Financ $ 12 s 1994aIce the February COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ver as much as we can. Recommend nses will be in the vicinity of ~25U,000 we want to recd Since our exile Approval. gUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ency Management Agency requires that an individual The Federal Emerg the Board of Supervisors to act as or individuals be authorized by their agent(s) to provide the State anfinanciallin ormation Management Agency (FEMA) with the necessary during the to obtain reimbursement for damage to Roanoke County recent ice storm. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Chief Accountant Vincent Copenhaver e t for matters pertaining to the designated as Roanoke County's Agen February 1994 ice storm. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------ ------------ -------------------- VOTE - ACTION No yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by• uarrv ~ Nickens - rove designation Eddy x Denied ( ) m„+;ten to app f Vincent Co enhaver Johnson x x Received ( ) o gohinke Ref erred ( ) Minnix x To ( ) Nickens x cc: File Finance Diane Hyatt, Director, Vincent Copenhaver, Chief Accountant ~r~ DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION County of Roanoke, Virginia BE IT RESOLVED BY Board of Supervisors OF (Public Entity) (Governing Body) THAT Vincent Copenhaver, Chief Accountant Icial Position) * (Name of Incumbent) (off OR * (Name of Incumbent) d ' behalf of Governor's Authorized Representative, Count of Roanoke is hereby authorized to execute for an m Virginia a public entity established under the laws of the State of this application and to file it in the appropriate State office for the p ess°or otherwise av ailable fromethef Pres dent's assistance under the Disaster Relief Act (Public Law 288, 93rd Congr ) Disaster Relief Fund. THAT ounty of RnannkP , a public entity established under the laws of the State of V i r a i n i a ,hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State and to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for all matters pertaining to such Federal disaster assistance the assurances and agreements printed on the reverse side hereof. 12th day of April , 192• Pacsed and approved this Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Board (Name and Title) CERTIFICATION Clerk of ~ Mary H . Allen ,duly appointed and (Title) Board of Supervisors , County do hereby ce~tli~y that the above is a true and correct copy of a RnannkP resolution passed and approved by the Board of Supervisoz~ Cou ~~blic Entity) (Governing Body) on the 12th day of April- , 19~- Date; Apr i 1 19 , 19 9 4 Clerk to the Board 1 P 'tion) (Signature) (O f ficla ost +Name o/incumbent need not be provided in those cases where the governing body of the public entity desires to authorize any incumbent of the designated o ffieeai position to represent it. FEMA Form 90.63. MAR 81 A-41294-5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Cable Television 1994-95 Operating Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ /~ ,~(f~~1 =-yvvy'a"~ ~f ~~IC~ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Cox Cable provided a capital grant to Roanoke County, Roanoke City and Vinton in the amount of $480,000 for expenditure on capital equipment for a government and educa- tional access channel and studio. The three local governments fund the operation of the government and educational access channel (RVTV), including the salary of a Cable Access Director, and will be funding the operation of the station, which is due to begin around July 1, 1994. The channel and the station serve the three local governments and the two schools systems, and the Access Director has already been responsible for the production of a variety of videotapes for various uses. Once the studio is operational, County students will have the opportunity to learn about television production through classes and working in the facility. Cox Cable pays a franchise fee to the local governments of 5 percent of gross receipts, and the governments have agreed to expend up to 20 percent of this franchise fee (or up to 1 percent of Cox's gross receipts) to fund the operation of the government access station. Each locality contributes a percentage of the total budget based on that locality's percentage of Cox Cable subscribers. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee met on March 2, 1994, and approved the attached budget. At the beginning of the upcoming fiscal year, the government access studio will become operational at the Jefferson 1 ~~ Center, which will necessitate the payment of rent. The Access Director has been using space at Patrick Henry High School, which was provided free of charge by the Roanoke City Schools. The renovations to the space at the Jefferson Center have been estimated at $159,000, which will be paid by the Center, leaving the capital grant intact for purchase of equipment for the studio. As a government and educational access station, RVTV will need to maintain office hours, produce access programming, including live coverage of governmental meetings, maintain a schedule of on- air programming, and take over total production of "The Roanoke City Manager's Report" and "Roanoke County Today". (Production of these two programs in-house will save the City and the County each approximately $800 per month.) In order to accomplish these; objectives, it will be necessary to employ part-time production assistants. It will also be necessary to maintain a vehicle for transporting equipment and personnel to and from location shoots. (The vehicle will be purchased with funds from the Cox Cable grant; however, mileage and minor maintenance will be covered by the Operating Budget.) Based on the above, three budget line items - "Part-time", "Travel (mileage)" and "Lease of Building" are the only areas requiring a significant increase for 1994-95. The total budget request for FY 1994-95 is $116,057, and the breakdown per locality is as follows: Roanoke County (36~) $41,780 Roanoke City (57~) $66,153 Town of Vinton (7~) $ 8,124 The Operating Budget for 1993-94 was $99,802, and the Access Director projects that approximately $91,000 will be expended by the end of the fiscal year. The remaining balance, as per action previously approved by the Board of Supervisors, will roll over into the station's own Capital account for future equipment purchases. FISCAL IMPACT: Cox Cable's gross receipts from Roanoke County in 1993 were $7,104,893, which produced a 5 percent franchise fee of $355,245. The Board has previously agreed to fund the Government and Educational Access Channel in an amount up to 1 percent of the gross revenues, or $88,811. The current budget request of $41,780 is less than half that amount. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the request for $41,780 as Roanoke County's share of the Regional Cable Television Budget as requested for Fiscal Year 1994-95. 2 ~.5 2. Do not approve the Cable Television Budget as requested. This will prevent Roanoke County and the County schools from using the new studio and the services of the Cable Access Director. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. During the past year, the Cable Access Director has provided invaluable assistance to the County through the production of "Roanoke County Today", through advice on the design of the new Board of Supervisors Meeting room for televising Board meetings, and through the taping of a variety of historic events, including the first run of the Waste Line Express to the new landfill, and the water pumping ceremony at Spring Hollow Reservoir. nne Marie Green Elmer C. Hodg Director, Community Relations County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve Cable TV Budget Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Minnix x To Nickens x Eddy x cc: File Anne Marie Green, Director of Community Relations Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Howard E. Musser, Chairperson, Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee 3 ,. ~-S CABLE TELEVISION PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1994-95 1993-94 Budget Request Budget 1994-95 1010 Regular 29,283 30,240 1020 Part time 6,000 20,000 2100 FICA - Employer Cont. 2,700 3,844 2200 Retirement VSRS 2,996 2,919 2300 Group Health 1,620 1,615 2310 Group Dental Ins. 156 150 2400 Life Insurance - VSRS 256 199 3013 Professional Services - Other 6,480 6,000 3101 Temporary Help Services 3,072 1,000 3202 Repairs (Office Equipment) 1,000 1,000 3209 Repairs (Other Equipment) 2,250 2,000 3530 Printed Forms 9,400 3,000 3610 Advertising 2,000 2,000 3620 Public Information-Advertising 500 500 4600 Central Services 1,000 1,000 5210 Postage 250 250 5230 Telephone 1,500 1,900 5300 General Liability Insurance 500 500 5410 Lease/Rent of Equipment 3,540 3,540 5420 Lease/Rent of Buildings 15,000 26,600 5501 Travel (Mileage) 576 2,840 5520 Dinner Meetings and Luncheons 100 100 5540 Training and Education 500 500 5801 Dues and Association Memberships 373 600 5813 Refunds and Rebates 0 0 5819 Small Equipment and Supplies 1,500 500 5883 Video Supplies 4,000 3000 6010 Office Supplies - General 600 400 6011 Photocopies 100 6202 Subscriptions 150 300 8101 Machinery and Equipment-New 2,000 500 8201 Furniture/Office Equip - New 0 0 8401 Small Capital Outlay 500 500 8701 Data Processing Equip - new 0 0 Total 99,802 116,057 4 A-41294-6 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Share Restroom/Concession School in the Cost of a new facility at Cave Spring High COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval of this "loan" from the funds that will be used for Southwest County bopd projects. During our work session with the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission we will ask them to develop a "matching" program to encourage public participation in the funding of such projects. The funds can then be used to replace the bond proceeds. EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY The Booster Club at Cave Spring High School has worked to obtain the donation of money, materials and labor to help construct a restroom/concession facility at the High School Property. This type of facility is needed for public use not only during school baseball, soccer, track or tennis events, but also for the general public who use the track and athletic facilities. The cost of this facility is approximately $50,000. The County is being asked to install the water and sewer lines and connections (approximately $7,000) and to contribute $15,000 towards the construction cost for a total of $22,000. This project was not included in the 1992 Bond Referendum, but has been identified in the Capital program of the School in the budget recently presented to the Board of Supervisors. Subsequent to the community meeting administration on March 30, we have finalized the Valley Soccer group Merriman Road site and committed. to expedite the planned that potential funding with the school the agreement with improvements at the source has now been Staff suggests that the Board of Supervisors consider implementing an incentive fund within the 1994-95 Budget which could be used to match local community efforts with County dollars to construct similar capital projects in the Parks and Recreation area. The proposals from the community could be forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission for prioritization and considered during the budget process for funding. Since such an incentive fund is not in place today, staff recommends that the ~-b Board appropriate monies to match the community effort ($22,000) as a short-term loan from an existing funding source. This source could be a loan from the southwest county parks and recreation bond projects until the new school budget is adopted for the 1994-95 fiscal year. Staff further suggests that such loan be reimbursed from the School monies as included within their budget request. The donated labor and some materials are time sensitive working around business peak seasons and other projects so that an immediate response to the request is necessary. FISCAL IMPACT' The County (public) share of this project will be $22,000 and it is recommended that this amount be loaned to the project from the southwest County parks and recreation bond projects with the loan being re-paid from the school account in the 1994-95 budget. ALTERNATIVES' 1. Loan the monies to the community to allow the facility to be constructed during the Spring of 1994. 2. Take no action at this time which would delay the construction of the facility. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends alternative one which would loan the money to the project from the southwest County parks and recreation bond projects at this time and allow repayment from the school budget for 1994-95. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chambl ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Hob L Johnson mQ ion to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) ~~rnvP ransferrinc~ _fu_n_ds Eddy x Received ( ) from the capital fund Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance enacting Sections 12-40 to 12-43 of Article II. County Vehicle License of Chapter 12 Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code to provide authorization for regional enforcement of vehicle decal ordinances COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: . e.~ G1~ C~-'O ~ nvl ~~~~d-~-n~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of an ordinance revision to permit the County's participation in the joint enforcement of decal ordinances for the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem and the Town of Vinton. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several meetings of representatives from the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and Roanoke County have been held for the purpose of developing an agreement for regional enforcement of decal ordinances. At their last meeting, on March 16, the group agreed to work toward having the necessary arrangements in place prior to the next decal deadline. The Senior Assistant County Attorney has drafted a model ordinance and a model agreement. Representatives from each jurisdiction are presenting the agreement and the required ordinance revisions to their respective governing bodies in April. If this ordinance change is approved and the agreement is adopted, a meeting will be held to provide an update to the respective Commonwealth Attorneys and the appropriate General District Court judges. A joint press release will also be issued in the first week of April to announce the proposal. The proposed effective date of the agreement is June 1, and enforcement will begin on June 15. G-I FISCAL IMPACT: There is no increase in cost to the County. There should be some additional revenue resulting from the increased effort in enforcement of the decal ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the recommended changes to the decal ordinance and the regional agreement be approved. J eph benshain S for Assistant County Attorney ,~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----- ------------------------ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens G-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 12-40 TO 12-43 OF ARTICLE II. COUNTY VEHICLE LICENSE OF CHAPTER 12 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE AUTHORIZATION FOR REGIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF VEHICLE DECAL ORDINANCES WHEREAS, some residents of and individuals who normally garage or park a motor vehicle in Roanoke County continue to evade payment of personal property taxes and purchase of county vehicle decals; and WHEREAS, many of these owners and operators of unlicensed motor vehicles garaged and parked in Roanoke County work or travel on a regular basis into adjoining jurisdictions which also have local vehicle decal ordinances; and WHEREAS, many of the owners and operators of motor vehicles garaged and parked in adjoining jurisdictions work or travel on a regular basis into Roanoke County while remaining in violation of their local vehicle decal ordinances; and WHEREAS, the current fiscal environment requires that every effort be made to insure that all taxes rightfully owed to localities are collected by joint enforcement efforts, if necessary; and WHEREAS, the 1993 session of the General Assembly of Virginia amended §46.1-752 to expressly permit the governing bodies of two or more counties, cities or towns to enter into compacts for the regional enforcement of local motor vehicle license requirements; and ~-i WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 12, 1994; and the second reading for this ordinance was held on April 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. County Vehicle License of Chapter 12 Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the enactment of Section 12-40, 12-41, 12-42 and 12-43 to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-40. Regional enforcement of motor vehicle license requirements. Pursuant to the authority granted by subsection K of § 46.2- 752 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County hereby undertakes to enforce the local motor vehicle license requirements of such section adopted by any local government within the Commonwealth with which it shall enter into a compact for that purpose and to authorize such locality, or localities, to enforce in the same manner the motor vehicle license requirements of this County contained in this Article II of Chapter 12 of the Roanoke County Code. Sec. 12-41. Authorization of compacts with other jurisdictions. The County Administrator is hereby authorized, after consultation with the Chief of Police, to enter into compacts for the regional enforcement of local motor vehicle license requirements with such local governing bodies of this Commonwealth as he shall deem advisable upon such form as shall be approved by 2 ~-i the County Attorney. On an annual basis, the Clerk of this Board is hereby directed to provide, to the Clerk of each governing body and the Clerk of each court sitting in any locality with which the County has entered into a regional enforcement compact, a certified copy of those portions of this code which authorize a local vehicle license requirement. Sec. 12-42. Violations; penalty. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer on any street, highway, road or other travelled way in the County unless a valid local license decal issued by the situs jurisdiction of such vehicle is displayed thereon as required by the ordinance of such situs locality. The fact that the current license tax of the situs jurisdiction has been paid on such vehicle shall not bar prosecution for a violation of this section. A violation of this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) and not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). The owner or operator of any vehicle receiving a parking ticket or uniform traffic summons as provided for under subsection (c) of Section 12-34 may pay a fine in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) in the manner provided for in Sections 12-56 and 12-57 of this code in full satisfaction of such violation. Any violation of this section may not be discharged by payment of such fine except upon presentation of satisfactory evidence that the license herein required has been obtained. Any fine paid under this section shall be deposited to the credit of 3 ~-i the General Fund of the County of Roanoke, Virginia and no accounting need be made thereof to the situs jurisdiction of such vehicle. Sec 12-43. Duties of the Treasurer. 1. The Treasurer of Roanoke County shall carry out the responsibilities imposed upon him by Section 12-56 and 12-57 for all tickets issued under Section 12-42, in the same manner as for all other parking tickets. At the same time as the Treasurer shall send to the owner or operator of the motor vehicle the notice required by Sec. 12-57(a), he shall forward a copy of the original ticket and such notice to the Treasurer, or his equivalent counterpart, of the situs jurisdiction of such vehicle. 2. The Treasurer shall on an annual basis confer with the Treasurers, or their counterparts, of each jurisdiction which is a party to the Compact authorized by Sec. 12-41 for the purpose of selecting a standard color or background for the vehicle decals of each participating jurisdiction. The chief law enforcement officer of each participating jurisdiction shall be consulted prior to the formal selection of a common decal color or background. However, the refusal by one or more jurisdictions to agree to a common decal color or background shall not prohibit participation in such Compact or terminate any existing Compact. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be June 1, 1994. 4 G-i DG3Glffp ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL COMPACT FOR ENFORCEMENT OF VEHICLE DECAL ORDINANCES This REGIONAL COMPACT FOR THE INTERJURISDICTIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE DECAL ORDINANCES is entered into this day of , 1994, by and between the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton; WITNESSETH THAT, WHEREAS, the General Assembly of Virginia has amended § 46.2-752 to specifically authorize two or more counties, cities or towns to enter into compacts for the regional enforcement of local motor vehicle licensing requirements; and WHEREAS, each of the jurisdictions entering into this Regional Compact has duly adopted an ordinance in substantially identical form to authorize its chief administrator to execute this compact and to provide the legal authorization for each of the other jurisdictions to enforce its local motor vehicle licensing requirements in the same manner as their own. NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned jurisdictions agree to the following: 1. The law enforcement officers of each jurisdiction .shall be authorized to enforce the motor vehicle licensing and decal requirements of every other participating jurisdiction in the same manner and with the same force of law as its own motor vehicle licensing and decal requirements. 2. Any parking ticket or uniform traffic summons issued by a jurisdiction's law enforcement officers to the owner or operator who is in violation of the local licensing requirements of the vehicle's situs shall be enforced in accordance G-i with the procedural requirements of the jurisdiction issuing such ticket or summons and in the appropriate court of that jurisdiction. All fines or court costs paid or collected in connection with the enforcement of such ticket or summons shall be credited to the account of the issuing jurisdiction and no accounting need be made thereof to the jurisdiction of the vehicle's situs. 3. No parking ticket or uniform traffic summons issued for a violation of the local licensing or decal requirements of any of these jurisdictions shall be discharged until satisfactory evidence has been produced to the appropriate Treasurer or court officer indicating that the required license has been obtained from the jurisdiction of the vehicle's situs and until full payment of the requisite fines and court costs, if applicable, have been made. motor vehicle licensing decal required by their respective ordinances. However, in the event one or more of the jurisdictions which are a party to this Compact are unwilling to agree to such standard color or background for their local decal for any one year, this Compact shall remain in full force and effect for such jurisdiction and the law enforcement officers of the other participating jurisdictions are fully authorized to continue to enforce the motor vehicle licensing and decal requirements of all parties to this Compact. 2 a~s~~; G-i ~~ WITNESS the following signatures on behalf of the indicated jurisdictions as indication of the authorization and agreement of each participating governing body to the terms of this Compact. for the City of Roanoke for the City of Salem for the County of Roanoke for the Town of Vinton Date Date Date Date 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request approval to vacate a 15 foot Drainage Easement as shown on Lots 6, 7, and 8, located on Elbert Drive Block 1, Section 1 of Sugarloaf Highlands Subdivision and recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 43 and Plat Book 15, Page 35 (refer to attached plat) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• The Petitioner, Walter J. Baumoel, Jr. and Sue G. Baumoel, the owners of lots 6, 7, and 8, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a 15 foot drainage easement, which passes through all three lots and in turn will grant to Roanoke County a new 20 foot drainage easement which will be located further north on the referenced lots as shown on the attached map. BACKGROUND• Mr. & Mrs. Baumoel is requesting this vacation because the existing drainage easement, which currently is not in use, passes through the existing houses and pool on lots 6, 7 and 8. When the houses and pool were constructed the owners thought the easement had previously been vacated and only recently discovered through resubdividing of the property it had not been vacated. In return, Mr. & Mrs. Baumoel is granting a new drainage easement located to the north of the existing easement toward the back portion of these lots thus eliminating the encroachment. (see attached map) G-a SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County staff is requesting-that the described drainage easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1- 482(b), State of Virginia, 1950, as amended by the adoption of the attached ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled to be held on April 12, 1994; the public hearing and second reading is scheduled for April 26, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate the 15 foot drainage easement shown on lots 6, 7, and 8 and recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 43 and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. 9~L~MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: w--~.-~. rfiold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Insp tions County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred Tc~ Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 G-a. NORTH TAX / 7s.o3-o2-09 IAT 9 8 U~7 O ~ TAX / 7&OS-Ot-27 SUGARLOAF WEST ~ nor s NEW 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE CENTERED ALONG PO{NTS D. E, P do G ®~ TAX ~ 7&Ot-01-04 _. - --- - -- -.. _ __ - 2 ~ o- ,~ y.~.,.\ \ ~ ~ -1 i.r - -- - - ~. r ~I ~ , ~ ~~t~~~ w.. f- ~-- a ass. w ~'&d' -~ ` `(F _ y, 4~~i /..' / d ~ ~~. .1~ ~ " _--- ~- - -~ ~~ 1st CZ ~,,, 1.. '~~J ~ ,\ ~ LOT 9A t 1 ~~~~.; ~ ' ~ tAxr-~+ ', ~ VACATED 15' D.E._ ~- i~ \ ' . LOT 10 ~ 1 LOT 8A LOT 7A 1 --- _-._ _ ELBERT DRIVE NO'T'E SWIMMING POOL AND EXPS'IiNG BUILDINGS ON LOTS 8A k 9A TO BE RAZED. WALTER J. BAUMOEL, JR. Ec SUE G. BAUMOEL TAX f 76.03-02-23. 24 ~ BLOCK 1 ~.... a•~ ...~. ~ ~.... tAX ~ 78.OS^02-20 a, ~ 1 ~I' S '', 1 `' tAZ gA ~~ ~, t1 ~ fit !. ~ ,~ ~-+ I y ...o-•--'_ 1---.-.:..:-- guGPRl.OAF M~• R0. ROANOKE COUNTY REQIIEST APPROVAL TO VACATE 15 FOOT DRAINAGE ENGINEERING & EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, LOCATED ON ELBERT DRIVE, BLOCK 1, SECTION OF SIIGARLOAF INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT HIGHLANDS SIIBDIVISIOIN AND RECORDED IN IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 43, IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MA~TSTF.RTAT- DISTRICT 3 "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 ON ELBERT DRIVE IN BLOCK 1, SECTION 1 OF SUGARLOAF HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION (PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 43 AND PLAT BOOK 15, PAGE 35), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Walter J. and Sue G. Baumoel have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 15-foot drainage easement located on Lots 6, 7, and 8 on Elbert Drive (Block 1, Section 1 of Sugarloaf Highlands Subdivision) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 7, at page 43 and Plat Book 15, at page 35) of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 15-foot drainage easement located on Lots 6, 7, and 8 on Elbert Drive (Block 1, Section 1, Sugarloaf Highlands Subdivision, PB 7, page 43 and PB 15, page 35) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, G•a Walter J. and Sue G. Baumoel will grant a new drainage easement located to the north of the existing drainage easement toward the rear portion of these lots; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Walter J. and Sue G. Baumoel shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associat- ed herewith. 5. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by Walter J. and Sue G. Baumoel, their heirs, successors, or assigns. 6. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. ACTION NO. ITEM NO . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 36.12-1-23 AND LOCATED ON NORTH LAKE DRIVE (BLOCK 3M, SECTION 10, NORTH LAKES SUBDIVISION) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: .~,,~ /~ a ~d- SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting that the Board declare a parcel of real estate located on North Lake Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District and identified as Tax Map No. 36.12-1-23 (Block 3M, Section 10, North Lakes Subdivision) to be surplus property and to adopt at second reading an ordinance authorizing the sale of this property. FISCAL IMPACTS' The proceeds from the sale of this surplus property shall be paid into the capital projects fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that th to be surplus property, and to authorizing the sale of this e Board declare Tax Map No. 36.12-1-23 adopt at second reading an ordinance property. Respectfully submitted, p, w hn D. Willey Property Manager Approved by, ~. ~~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 G -.3 Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to c:\wp5l \agenda\realest\nolakes. rpt Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 2 G-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 36.12-1-23 AND LOCATED ON NORTH LAKE DRIVE (BLOCK 3M, SECTION 10, NORTH LAKES SUBDIVISION) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is hereby declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on April 12, 1994; and a second reading was held on April 26, 1993, concerning the sale and disposition of a parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 36.12-1-23; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of property for accepted/rejected; and is hereby 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital projects fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of to purchase this which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 'r. L,. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS OF ARTICLE II, DOGS,. CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO REQUIRE LICENSURE OF CATS, TO PROVIDE STANDARDS FOR THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CATS PER DWELLING UNIT, TO PROVIDE FOR A THREE YEAR LICENSE TAX FOR DOGS AND CATS, TO INCREASE THE BOARD FEE FOR IMPOUNDED ANIMALS AND TO DEFINE CERTAIN ACTS COMMITTED BY ANIMALS AS NUISANCES AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES THEREFORE. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend Approval. For this ordinance to have any strength, I believe it will be necessary to have licensing and nuisance provisions. We have already assumed too much of the responsibility of the State game warden in responding to calls involving wild game, and need to return this responsibility to the State. If this is not acceptable to the Board, then I feel certain that additional staff will be necessary. BACKGROUND• The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on March 8, 1994 and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 22, 1994 concerning the licensure of cats and animal law enforcement in general. County staff has met with the County Administrator to consider comments made by residents and suggestions made by Board members. These changes have been incorporated into the attached ordinance which is provided for your final adoption. The ordinance includes the following provisions: 1. Require the licensure of cats in the same manner as dogs with a reduced rate for animals which have been neutered or spayed. (The current individual license rate is at the state maximum. ) 2. Although a cattery license had been discussed, (similar to 1 ~}-1 kennels for dogs), the state code does not provide for such license, therefore, each cat must be individually licensed. (See provision 3 below concerning agricultural operations and grandfather provisions.) 3. Limit the number of animals that may be kept per dwelling to no more than two ( 2 ) dogs over four months of age unless a private kennel license has been issued; no more than six cats over four months of age of which no more than two may be fertile unless the dwelling is a part of an active agricultural operation or usage as defined by the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County; and to allow the current owner of more than six cats to keep the present animals if properly licensed and vaccinated, however, the owner shall not be allowed to acquire any additional cats above the number allowed by the ordinance. 4. Include the animal nuisance provisions of the ordinance as proposed except for the running at large language as it pertains to cats. It should be noted that the enforcement of the misdemeanor provisions of this ordinance are the same as any other misdemeanor offenses. The law enforcement officer can only act on the offense which has occurred in his/her presence. The ordinance provides the opportunity for the property owner or aggrieved person to obtain their own warrant for violations of the ordinance as a civil matter in the court system. 5. Increase the fees charged for the impoundment of animals from five dollars per day to six dollars per day in conformity to the new rates charged to the County under the new S.P.C.A. contract. 6. Allow the Treasurer to sell animal licenses for periods of either one year or three years. 7. A provision has been included to provide for the humane care of animals and responsible pet care. 8. Restrict the animal control operation to domesticated animals only. Non-domesticated animals and fowl come under the control of the Commonwealth of Virginias Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Citizen inquiries and requests for service related to this group of animals should be referred to the Game Warden for assistance. The ability to allow more than six cats at a dwelling which is a part of an active agricultural operation as defined by the Zoning Ordinance uses definitions already in place within the existing ordinance. Since cattery licenses (similar to kennels for dogs) is not allowed, we would otherwise need to amend our zoning ordinance, consider special use permits, and face implications of zoning 2 s ~- i issues such as public hearings, impact to BZA, and the work load to other unrelated staff. This language addresses the need of a person needing additional cats for rodent control, etc, yet continues to require that the cat be vaccinated for rabies (state law provision) and license for each cat under the County ordinance. A detailed review of the calls answered by animal control officers during the first six months of 1993 indicated that only 7$ of those calls related to wildlife. It is felt that by restricting the efforts of our officers to only domesticated animals and assisting on wildlife calls on an emergency basis (threat to human health or safety), we should be able to enforce the provisions of this ordinance without adding staff at this time. If we must continue to respond to wildlife calls or if asked to assume any of the animal control efforts for the Town of Vinton, we would need the addition of one officer and related equipment and expenses with the understanding that we may need to bring this matter back to the Board based upon the work load. With respect to the licensing of cats, the license for existing cats must be purchased within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the ordinance for the 1994 license year. The license is issued on a calendar year basis and full price of the license must be paid. The same would be true for any dog brought into the County whose license was purchased after January 1 of the license year. The new license must be purchased for 1995 at the appropriate time. Normally, licenses go on sale November 1 for the ensuing license year. FISCAL IMPACT• None at this time if the ordinance restricts animal control efforts to domesticated animals. It is anticipated that the number of animals impounded at the animal shelter will increase with the addition of the cat provisions of the ordinance, however, staff has no basis to judge the impact at this time. Should the workload be increased to the degree that additional staff or expenses are required, a report will be brought back to the Board for consideration. If staff is required to continue its response to calls related to non-domesticated animals as well as the cat provisions of the ordinance, we need to add one officer and related expenses for an increased appropriation of $62,810. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the attached ordinance be adopted with an implementation date of July 1, 1994. 3 1 .. s I Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ,~ ,~n ~-~ ~~ ~ ~' ~~~ Tea-' ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens cc Joe Obenshain Ken Hogan 4 µ- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS OF ARTICLE II, DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO REQUIRE LICENSURE OF CATS, TO PROVIDE STANDARDS FOR THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CATS PER DWELLING UNIT, TO PROVIDE FOR A THREE YEAR LICENSE TAX FOR DOGS AND CATS, TO INCREASE THE BOARD FEE FOR IMPOUNDED ANIMALS AND TO DEFINE CERTAIN ACTS COMMITTED BY ANIMALS AS NUISANCES AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES THEREFORE. WHEREAS, Article 4 of Chapter 27.4 of Title 3.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes local governing bodies to adopt local ordinances providing for the licensing of cats; and WHEREAS, neighboring jurisdictions to the County of Roanoke have recently amended their animal control ordinances to require the licensing of cats; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 8, 1994; and the second reading on April 12, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. Docls, Cats and Other Animals of Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 5-21. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: A~~~~~ ~u=s.ar~~e;;:~.~,.~a~~~tecl ~h~~>:ny r~~?g~.;.~~t. c~x,>::;»::>:::>.:>;::;:::.;:::;;:;:>,:.; ::::.::::::......; ~-i :..:a:: <:.;:.;~~~~...~.e::::..~-o ...:fit :.::.;:.~?~~er.:.;:.;:t~~:.;:.; :.:::.:::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::<:.;:.;:.;:.;:.::..~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;:.;:.;:.::.;:. ........................................ . ::::::::::i:Y:i::i::::::: ':i::ii::i::ii "::::iiiiiiisY::<::::'::iiiiii:::::::i::;iii`:::::::::i::::iiii:~::::;i::i::i:::"::::i::::?::i'Y:.:::i:::':::y>;:;~:`:;:;::::':::i":::i::i::i:::::::::i:::i:::~:~::::i:::i::i::i `::i::i::i::i::':i::i: ~.> :.:r..::.s:.;:~ ~~..~ .::.;:.;~ .: ...:::.:::::: ... .::::.>:.>:.:;::.. ~ .. <... :.:::..:.>:.::::.;~.: ::: ~.>:.>:.;:::: i i Si ~: ;`::%:+:iSi `5:::;::::; :'::r.&:~::::~<;:.. ~;xi:i;; r:: SiS::;: r ~ `:::::::::; ::::<.>::~::>::: ~: dgmesta,c hares ,aid rabbi°~s aricl othez ~~cT;~ >and:;>;~n;~a~a~.~:~~;~s:~~ ~ >: ma inta.a.~ed ~,n ~pz~f ~.~~men~ Owner: Any person having a right of property in a dog ±c, and any person who keeps or harbors a dog '± or has the dog !' cat in his care or who acts as its custodian, and any person who ~,i permits a dog 7e to remain on or about any premises occupied by him. Sec. 5-22. Violations of article. Unless otherwise specifically provided, a violation of any thereto. (a) All dogs c~"' in this county shall be deemed personal property and may be the subject of larceny and malicious or unlawful trespass, and the owners thereof may maintain any action for the killing of any such dogs err ca~~, or injury thereto, or unlawful detention or use thereof, as in the case of other personal property. The owner of any dog or ~a which is injured or killed contrary to the provisions of this article by any person shall be entitled to recover the value thereof a€ the damage done thereto in an appropriate action at law from such person. (b) The animal control officer or other officer finding a ;. stolen dog ~z~ cati or a dog off- cat held or detained contrary to aw shall have authority to seize and hold such dog ~t pending action before a general district court or other court. In no such action is instituted within seven (7) days, such officer shall 3 ~}-i deliver the dog o:,c~'~ to its owner. The presence of a dog on the premises of a person other than its legal owner shall raise no presumption of theft against the owner of such premises, and the animal control officer may take such dog r~''~ in charge and notify its legal owner to remove him. The legal owner of the dog csr,>>;t shall pay a reasonable charge for the keep of such dog a while in the possession of the animal control officer. Sec. 5-24. Limitation on number kept per dwelling unit. (a) The harboring or keeping of more than two (2) dogs over 4 ~-~ 5 N-i (b) A dog ca confined under this section may be claimed by the rightful owner after displaying proof of ownership, a current dog license and proof of current rabies inoculation of the No dog s' shall be released to any person claiming ownership, unless such license and proof have been displayed. ~~~~' ursuant to subsection (c) An owner claiming his ;~tt~t~ p (b) above shall be required to pay the actual expense incurred by ~::::::::~»:::::::::i:..: the county in keeping the ri<~~~ ~ confined. Such payment shal be made to the animal control officer or other officer at the time `'''' It shall be the dut of the of the release of the ~'l ~• Y animal control officer or other officer to furnish the owner with a written receipt for such payment, in a form and manner approved by the board of supervisors. Such officer shall keep a carbon copy of all such receipts in a bound book, which shall be turned over to the county treasurer when the book is filled and shall be subject to audit by representatives of the board of supervisors whenever requested. Any funds collected pursuant to this subsection shall be disposed of in the same manner as dog ! license taxes. No payment made under this subsection shall relieve the owner from prosecution for violating section 5-28. (d) If a dog ~sr'cat confined pursuant to this section is not claimed by the owner within seven (7) days from the time notice was given to the owner or if the owner cannot be located within seven (7) days after confinement, such ~Tl~A~~' deg may be disposed of 1n accordance with the provisions of section 3.1-796.96 of the Code of Virginia ~€s`~ucc~~~r. 6 I-~-~ (e) A pickup fee of ten dollars ($10.00) for the first offense, twenty dollars ($20.00) for the second offense, and thirty dollars ($30.00) for the third offense shall be imposed in addition ~.>;.; ::. er da to the normal board fee of ~ €~e dollars ( $+~3f~ ~~) p Y when any dog is claimed by its owner or custodian. Sec. 5-34. Penalties. (~~~ Ex~~pt, as .q~herw;zae::sp~ca,~a~a~ly p~ov~d~d<:::::::or the penalties for violation of all ^*~~~sections of this chapter shall be as follows: (1) For the first offense, a fine of not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than twenty ($20.00). (2) For a second offense within a consecutive twelve-month period, a fine of not less than twenty dollars ($20.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00). ( 3 ) For a third Arid ' ~~ 1 ! sub~~~u~rt~ of fense~ ;rst~~-a } } ~- - ^}~, - ^a a fine of not less fifty 7 +- I (24) hours of such order. Sec 5-35. Responsible animal care. ``~:;..> ~~:::.~~~~..~..::: ~~::: ~.~~~u~.::::~~~-.::a.~.: :::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::.:::::::::::::: .................................................................... a A::.:~~f~~zent.. q~anti:ty o~...gvc~d:::an~;:~r~.~l~~~?~ <f+~~a'€~c ;<..: ;;:;;;::. e,,,: te~t:~:Qn;:::.and:;>:.sh~lter<:>~~~?m:::>.::~h:~::::~t~~~~~::~:. b.::::::: ~~e, ~z~~ p~'~ :.:::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.::::::::::::::.::::::::. >::::>::::~r d~se~s€. transma.~s~.ont' (d)..::'Ad~c~ua~e ca,r~, ~~~a~~it~z~:::.az~d:: ~~~~sp~~~a~ ~~~> Sec. 5-36. Animal control officers; Duties and responsibilities. Th+s~e.:: zs :.k~ere?a...::.>~~~~~e~;:.~tz~;;::..:4~:~.~~.: : ::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::..:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::. r: ::: ~ ': '::::: ..: ' : ~ :::....:..:.... ~~...~~x~:::>:Ae axmen~ :~~ ~na.ma~. ~arzt~c~~.. <the::~n:~a~:::~nc~>::<~::::::;:::e w~t~i.:..:;>:;::>::::..:.;::>::>::>::.::>::>:p::.;::>:.>::::::;;:::: ;.>:.;:::: >: ...:.;:.;:.;::.:.::.;:.;:.;:.::.:.;.:..> :.::::::.::::::....::::::::;:...:.......... ::::::::::.....::.... ~e +eni~::::>::>:::<:vr>::>::>::an, ,,;:::.~..~w.:::::.ezi~'~a~~em~xx~:::::~a~.~.~..~~~.:::::~h,~,~,~- :.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~r .::: h.~s::::::a :..:......:..................:.:::.::::::: Y,.::::.::::::::::::::::.:::::::............................::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.:................ :::::::::.:::::::::::: fcxl~.~aw~.~g pQwe~~'> with ~aba.e~',`: ......: ~~:::.~:::.r:< ..... (ba `, May entex' ugox~ p,ra,vat~:p~'ope~ty', ~Q<.~zi~~~~x:c~~t~.~~x?~~~~nts. 8 ~.- i DIVISION 2. LICENSE Sec. 5-41. Required. ...................... It shall be unlawful for any person to own a dog € four ....................... ( 4 ) months old or over in this county, unless such dog ~ is currently licensed under the provisions of this division. Sec. 5-42. License year. ~~) Dog ~~~ eat licenses shall run by the calendar year, namely from January 1 to December 31, inclusive. Sec. 5-43. Application; applicant to be county resident. (a) Any resident of this county may obtain a dog '„„~' license by making oral or written application to the county treasurer, accompanied by the amount of the license tax and the certificate of vaccination required by section 5-48. The treasurer shall have authority to license only dogs 3C" of resident owners or custodians who reside within this county and may require 9 i+-~ information to this effect from any applicant. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make a false statement in order to secure a dog ;`G license to which he is not entitled. Sec. 5-44. Tax imposed. (a) An annual license tax is hereby imposed on dogs required to be licensed under this division in the following amounts: (1) Male dog aar cad: Ten dollars ($10.00). (2) Female dog o~'.cat: Ten dollars ($10.00). (3) Neutered or spayed dog 4r cat:: Five dollars ($5.00) with ..................... . ...................... a veterinarian's certificate that the dog £}'?~ has been neutered or spayed. (4) Kennel for up to twenty (20) dogs: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00). (5) Kennel for up to fifty (50) dogs: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00). (6) Dangerous dog, as declared by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth: Fifty Dollars ($50.00) (in addition to the other applicable fees 10 I+-I any dog that is trained and serves as a guide dog for a blind person or that is trained and serves as a hearing dog for a deaf or hearing impaired person. As used herein, the term "hearing dog " means a dog trained to alert its owner, by touch, to sounds of danger and sounds to which the owner should respond. ::d;::: :::>.....~#'t ..:x~:R::::::>:~.~'t~'`t ~hs~t~.~ << ~1 ...~':>:::~:~'~q'~~3?~3~e~ c'~, a,xis?'..>~`~~17sx1;>:::~>;>;:.::::::. :``'';:~x;:;i::::~:;;:::;ii:::~::::;:;: :?:'~:..~r.~Ti.~:R~i...~r.'::::i ;::.;y;:;:;<:;:;:; :~Rla:;:;:; ::i;i::;:::::i::;::i:::::!i::i::%~ ':::i::y'~,i~::i:::::: ~~:`~~:..~/.,:;:;:i:F~ :: ~::: ;;::: r:i::i::i::i i:~y,,. .. ... '::4~:;~.~,e~,.;:;:;: ::2;:;;":::::;:s~::i:::i:i::;i::;::;:;:::i . .. .: ~:,.~r,.~,.,~',p,.;~;~G:~~A::: Sec. 5-45. When and where tax due and payable. The license tax on dogs and;!~at~ shall be due and payable at the office of the county treasurer as follows: (1) On or before January 1 and not later than January 31 of this county shall come into the possession of any person in this county between January 1 and October 31 of any year, the license tax for the current calendar year shall be paid forthwith by the owner. (3 ) If a dog or,;;,g~t shall become four ( 4 ) months of age or if a dog ox- Kati over four (4) months of age unlicensed by this county shall come into the possession of any person in this county between November 1 and December 31 of any year, the license tax for the succeeding calendar year shall be paid forthwith by the owner and such license 11 µ-i shall protect the dog ca!from the date of payment of the license tax. Sec. 5-46. Failure to pay tax when due. It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog :R'?t to fail to pay the tax imposed by this division when the same is due. Payment of such tax subsequent to a summons to appear before a court for failure to do so within the time required by this division shall not operate to relieve such owner from the penalties provided for such failure. Sec. 5-47. Concealing or harboring dog '< upon which tax not paid. It shall be unlawful for any person to conceal or harbor any dog on which the license tax imposed by this division has not been paid. Sec. 5-48. Issuance, composition and contents. (a) Upon receipt of a proper application and the prescribed ...................... license tax, the county treasurer shall issue a dog ?> license; ........ .......... provided, however, that such license shall not be issued unless the applicant presents a certificate meeting the requirements of section 5-67 and showing that the dog 3C'? in question has been vaccinated against rabies as required by section 5-66. When the license is issued, such certificate shall be so marked and returned .............................. ............................ to the dog's ar cat's owner. (b) A dog license shall consist of a license tax receipt and a tag made of twenty-gauge metal or other suitable material in a rectangular shape one-half inch in width and two (2) 12 }.4 i inches in length, with a one-eighth inch hole at each end. (c) The receipt issued pursuant to this section shall have recorded thereon the name and address of the owner or custodian of the dog ',, the date of payment, the year for which the license is issued, the serial number of the tag and whether the license is (e) The license tag for a kennel shall consist of a license receipt and a tag made of twenty-gauge metal or other suitable material two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in diameter, stamped or otherwise permanently marked, showing "Roanoke County, Va. Kennel Tag, ' ' the calendar year,:..', ox such 7.v~g~ <p~r~.~±.. for which issued, the number of dogs and a serial number. Sec. 5-49. Preservation and exhibition of license receipt. A dog ~~ license receipt shall be carefully preserved by the person to whom it is issued and exhibited promptly on request for inspection by the animal control officer or any other officer. Sec. 5-50. Tag to be worn by dog; exceptions. (a) A dog license tag shall be securely fastened to a substantial collar by the owner or custodian of the dog and worn by such dog. It shall be unlawful for the owner or custodian to permit any licensed dog four (4) months old or over to run at large at any time without a license tag. 13 ~I- i (b) The owner of a dog may remove the collar and license tag required by this section when the dog is engaged in lawful hunting; when the dog is competing in a dog show; when the dog has a skin condition which would be exacerbated by the wearing of a collar; when the dog is confined; or when the dog is under the immediate control of its owner. (c) Any dog not wearing a collar bearing a license tag of the proper calendar year shall prima facie be deemed to be unlicensed, and in any proceeding under this article, the burden of proof of the fact that such dog ~xr„fat has been licensed or is otherwise not required to bear a tag at the time shall be on the ....................... ....................... owner of the dog Ic>~',. Sec. 5-51. Unlawful removal of tag. It shall be unlawful for any person, except the owner or custodian, to remove a legally acquired license tag from a dog ka Sec. 5-52. Duplicate tags. If a dog ~]C'jLC~t license tag shall become lost, destroye or stolen, the owner or custodian shall at once apply to the county treasurer for a duplicate license tag, presenting the original license receipt. Upon affidavit of the owner or custodian before the treasurer that the original license tag has been lost, destroyed or stolen, he shall issue a duplicate license tag, which the owner or custodian shall immediately affix to the collar of the dog. The treasurer shall endorse the number of the duplicate and the date issued on the face of the original license receipt. The 14 J • ' ~ +s fee for a duplicate tag shall be one dollar ($1.00). Sec. 5-53. Records of licenses sold. A list of all dog c~` licenses and kennel licenses sold shall be made in triplicate, consecutively numbered, and showing to whom issued; residence address; magisterial district; tag number; year ending; day, month and year issued; and the signature of the county treasurer. The original copy shall be delivered to the dog owner, the second copy shall be retained by the treasurer ......................: ....................... ....................... and the third copy shall be delivered to animal control officer. Sec. 5-54. Disposition of unsold tags. Unsold dog and.ca~ license tags for the preceding calendar year shall be disposed of by the county treasurer after verification by a certified public accountant employed by the board of supervisors to audit the records and accounts of the county for the fiscal year next ending. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after July 1, 1994. 15 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE 41294-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS OF ARTICLE II, DOGE, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS, OF CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL OF THE ROANORE COIINTY CODE TO REQUIRE LICENSURE OF CATS, TO PROVIDE STANDARDS FOR THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF CATS PER DWELLING UNIT, TO PROVIDE FOR A THREE YEAR LICENSE TA% FOR DOGS AND CATS, TO INCREASE THE BOARD FEE FOR IMPOUNDED ANIMALS AND TO DEFINE CERTAIN ACTS COMMITTED BY ANIMALS AS NUISANCES AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES THEREFORE. WHEREAS, Article 4 of Chapter 27.4 of Title 3.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes local governing bodies to adopt local ordinances providing for the licensing of cats; and WHEREAS, neighboring jurisdictions to the County of Roanoke have recently amended their animal control ordinances to require the licensing of cats; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 8, 1994; a public hearing on March 22, 1994; and the second reading on April 12, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article II. Dogs, Cats, and Other Animals of Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 5-21. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: ............ »~~#~~~.:::~#b:~ ....DDS ~. ~~~......~Dd~tD..~:7:`B...~~#:~::....~:. ~::.: .::: .:::o ................................................................... ................................................................... .................................................................... ................................................................... ~i :}j~^ ry} ~{y~'~~ {~ ~i7j~~]t~ 'yid {~}~ ~jFp::i':i::ji~ii~:'`~i:%%:::iiii':;::~':}j:;: •:;;;;; ::.:::~::I3~::::::::is~.fMC~~M~~::::::::::::i:::~~:s~~**:~M~• •~~~:i•:::•::::::y!IS'~MiiM~:~~{:ZiC:::::~~:::::::~~~YT:~fIR~::'::i:~14t~:W~!YX:~:s:=..~ ::i:::::~:iiivW! :~.~:::Y~::::::::::.:~ ::::::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:w:::::::: ::v:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::nom::::::::::::::::::::::. ~. ~: ~:::::::::.: ~::::::: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ;.)':.}.:.}..:.}..:.: '.ii~:!:i.~iii'riiiY iiii'.iii'.iY.i'r ':4Y~iiiiii}iiiiiiiQi::.i':: }i::.i}}:}yiX:.iiiiiiii:...jry+}\i'ry::: iiiii•iiiiiii: ':~i'.is:.:i'::.iiaiiiiiiiiiiiii''.iii©iii'r.X4i}}::~i}iXiiiiiii:'ii'.i'.ii'.i~i: :: {i~:y'?: ~i~:.{iiii}iii}i}.::~i}}}}}ij'.ri~ii:"iiY~~i''~i'yi~Y~yiiji'}' ~~~~i~Yl.::yy'::::::•:::•:::::•. ~ :~~~~::~yyv:::•:::::::~:i1~:~~Hf::'::::::::•:::•::i~~Yf~:'i~:i:•:::::•i:::~~MF::: ~::>:::i::i:..~ :~M!~:M?~.rW.~::~'.::::::i:::::i:~ili:rMr.: ~}.~i.::".:}::i::i:::::Vl~:~l/i~i~~:i~l::s:;.rM~.~Mf ::.~::1.•::::::::~:::.~::::::::::.f.v:::::.~ :::::::::::::::::::~•::::::::::::::::::::::nT..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f::::::::~.:::::::::::::::.~.._::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::.~.:::::::::::::::::::::::. ~::::::::::::. ...................... Owner: Any person having a right of property in a dog , and any person who keeps or harbors a dog [ or has the dog in his care or who acts as its custodian, and any person who ...................... permits a dog c~ to remain on or about any premises occupied by 2 him. Sec. 5-22. Violations of article. Unless otherwise specifically provided, a violation of any Sec. 5-23. Dogs ~±#~ deemed personal property; rights relating thereto. (a) All dogs in this county shall be deemed personal property and may be the subject of larceny and malicious or unlawful trespass, and the owners thereof may maintain any action ........................... for the killing of any such dogs , or injury thereto, or unlawful detention or use thereof, as in the case of other personal property. The owner of any dog which is injured or killed contrary to the provisions of this article by any person shall be entitled to recover the value thereof a€ the damage done thereto in an appropriate action at law from such person. (b) The animal control officer or other officer finding a stolen dog ~~ or a dog rat held or detained contrary to law ........................ shall have authority to seize and hold such dog cl pending action before a general district court or other court. In no such action is instituted within seven (7) days, such officer shall deliver the dog ~'t to its owner. The presence of a dog '~s! 3 r on the premises of a person other than its legal owner shall raise no presumption of theft against the owner of such premises, and the animal control officer may take such dog c~'` in charge and notify its legal owner to remove him. The legal owner of the dog ~:i shall pay a reasonable charge for the keep of such dog while in the possession of the animal control officer. Sec. 5-24. Limitation on number kept per dwelling unit. (a) The harboring or keeping of more than two (2) dogs over four (4) months of age per dwelling shall be unlawful, unless a private kennel license has been issued pursuant to this article. 4 Sec. 5-26. Nuisance prohibited. °~~^~~~' Sec. 5-29. Same - Impoundment. (a) It shall be the duty of the animal control officer or other officer to cause any dog found running at large in violation 4}iiiii:i^iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil +iii4iiiiiiiiiiiiiihi; iiii}}}i:+•iii:~iii:>:::i::::.': :isn};,;yy:iiif>::iTisS:::tvXii:~::Y>~:i:::>:}..::i:t:i::::i:••::ii::n ... • :....: "iii:: •: .•. iiiY' :...: "4iii' •: iiiY' .: .: }}ii: ~-{ - `: '~:~'i:i.. ::i:::::4Al~~c::::::::~~:i{;A~~SIT:~:::::'r::~tilk:i~Y:~~ik V~l:::i: of section 5 28 0~':::>:::~th:.:::::::<::~;~..:<::c~::::~t::>::::~~~ :...:........ ..........................................::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::.. .:::. :::::.::.::.::::~;.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;..;..;..;..;:::::::::::~.:.:.i~:.:~.::.::.;:.;:::::::::::::::. ~:.:~.;:.;;:.;:::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.::::::::. .::::.~ .:::::::::::. ~:::::::::::::::::::.: ~:::::::::::::::::::.:;:.;:.;;:.;:;;;::;.>:.;::.>;i:.i>:.:;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;;:.;:.;:.::.:::::::::::::::.:::::::~~.:::::::::::::::::::.::::.:::::::::::::. ~:::::.:. and confined in the county animal shelter. Every effort shall be made on the part of the animal control or other officer to determine the ownership of ~a~1#t~' deg so confined and to notify the owner of its whereabouts. If the owner is known by virtue of a name tag or license or other identification tag on the dog ~~`~, such owner shall be notified forthwith by the person ....................... ,....i..i..~ taking the ~~i`~ deg into custody. ..............:........ ...................... ....................... (b) A dog >>:i confined under this section may be claimed by 5 the rightful owner after displaying proof of ownership, a current dog '`:t license and proof of current rabies inoculation of the <~iti ~. No dog shall be released to any person claiming ownership, unless such license and proof have been displayed. ~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ursuant to subsection (c) An owner claiming his ~E~~€~t-'~?< e~eg p (b) above shall be required to pay the actual expense incurred by ...................... the county in keeping the ?~ confined. Such payment shall be made to the animal control officer or other officer at the time ....................... of the release of the ~t#ri~t~ ~. It shall be the duty of the animal control officer or other officer to furnish the owner with a written receipt for such payment, in a form and manner approved by the board of supervisors. Such officer shall keep a carbon copy of all such receipts in a bound book, which shall be turned over to the county treasurer when the book is filled and shall be subject to audit by representatives of the board of supervisors whenever requested. Any funds collected pursuant to this subsection shall .......................... be disposed of in the same manner as dog xt'~ license taxes. No payment made under this subsection shall relieve the owner from prosecution for violating section 5-28. (d) If a dog confined pursuant to this section is not claimed by the owner within seven (7) days from the time notice was given to the owner or if the owner cannot be located within seven ...................... (7) days after confinement, such e~eg may be disposed of in ..................... ....................... ...................... accordance with the provisions of section 3.1-796.96 of the Code of g .t ..::::::.:...:.....:...:..................:........................ (e) A pickup fee of ten dollars ($10.00) for the first 6 offense, twenty dollars ($20.00) for the second offense, and thirty dollars ($30.00) for the third offense shall be imposed in addition to the normal board fee of a? €i~e dollars ($~~qE x-96) per day when any dog is claimed by its owner or custodian. Sec. 5-34. Penalties. ~e~re~a~s-e-~g~e . <~~:: the penalties for violation of all ~'~=-sections of this chapter shall be as follows: (1) For the first offense, a fine of not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than twenty ($20.00). (2) For a second offense within a consecutive twelve-month period, a fine of not less than twenty dollars ($20.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00). or a third ~~~ ~~~ offense~~~~~ art-hrn-a ••'-~--~ '-••~'- - ~}w ~~~~ ..a a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than 7 ...................... a, . ti,,,,..a,....a dollars ($~ 8) . (4) The judge trying the case may order any animal permanently removed from the county within twenty-four (24) hours of such order. Sec 5-35. Responsible animal care. .~.....~ ::::::.::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..'1~::::.:::::::.:::::::::.~::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::::::::.::.:::::::::::::: ~.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::: .:::::::........:......:.............................:::...........................................................................................:............................................................................. . < .:........................................................................................................................................................................................................... . .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. . s ~ ~d ~~~:~:~:: •::>::>~::lb; c'~x'4~xx~ f3~ ~~:~ tai`~...~~:::>::.»>:~#:~E~c~;:C~~E ..:.: .................:.. ..~.::::.3 .:::::::::::::::.~:.:;::::::::::::::::::::~:::.::::::::~:::::::.~::::::::::..:..................~.........:....::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:~:::: ~:.::::::::::::::::.. ::: •..:: ~:'::>::::»>:: ~ ".' :::::::::.'. ~~ ~ ':. ~..;..,, ~.. ~~::.: .<. •,;:::; ::;::~:.: ~; .::.,:....:::?:#::'. ~ ;: ~• .:: ~ >:> ::..:.....:..:..:. `.~z ~~•::' '::':'#>~~~ • •::; •...... Vii. DIVISION 2. LICENSE Sec. 5-43. Application; applicant to be county resident. (a) Any resident of this county may obtain a dog ~'k license by making oral or written application to the county treasurer, accompanied by the amount of the license tax and the certificate of vaccination required by section 5-48. The treasurer ............................ shall have authority to license only dogs ~zs``a of resident owners or custodians who reside within this county and may require information to this effect from any applicant. 9 (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make a false statement in order to secure a dog license to which he is not entitled. Seo. 5-44. Tax imposed. .............................. (a) An annual license tax is hereby imposed on dogs c~~tf required to be licensed under this division in the following amounts: (1) ........ Male dog .............. ?' Ten dollars ($10.00) . (2) ...................... Female dog Ten dollar s ($10.00). (3 ) Neutered or spayed dog ``~ ...................... ...................... Five dollars ( $5.00 ) with ...................... a veterinarian's certificate that the dog k`` has been neutered or spayed. (4) Kennel for up to twenty (20) dogs: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00). (5) Kennel for up to fifty (50) dogs: Thirty-five dollars ($35.00). (6) Dangerous dog, as declared by any General District Court or Circuit Court of this Commonwealth: Fifty Dollars ($50.00) (in addition to the other applicable fees herein) . ~G:; No license tax shall be levied under this section on any dog that is trained and serves as a guide dog for a blind 10 person or that is trained and serves as a hearing dog for a deaf or hearing impaired person. As used herein, the term "hearing dog " means a dog trained to alert its owner, by touch, to sounds of danger and sounds to which the owner should respond. Sec. 5-45. When and where tax due and payable. The license tax on dogs '#'fa shall be due and payable at the office of the county treasurer as follows: (1) On or before January 1 and not later than January 31 of this county shall come into the possession of any person in this county between January 1 and October 31 of any year, the license tax for the current calendar year shall be paid forthwith by the owner. (3) If a dog '`'t shall become ....................... ...................... four (4) months of age or if ........ a dog r;~ ............... ~? over four (4) months of age unlicensed by this county shall come into the possession of any person in this county between November 1 and December 31 of any year, the license tax for the succeeding calendar year shall be paid forthwith by the owner and such license ...................... shall protect the dog ~ti`~ from the date of payment of 11 to pay the tax imposed by this division when the same is due. Payment of such tax subsequent to a summons to appear before a court for failure to do so within the time required by this division shall not operate to relieve such owner from the penalties provided for such failure. ....................... Sec. 5-47. Concealing or harboring dog ?` upon which tax not paid. It shall be unlawful for any person to conceal or harbor any dog ~>~<?t on which the license tax imposed by this division has not been paid. Sec. 5-48. Issuance, composition and contents. (a) Upon receipt of a proper application and the prescribed ...................... license tax, the county treasurer shall issue a dog license; provided, however, that such license shall not be issued unless the applicant presents a certificate meeting the requirements of ....................... section 5-67 and showing that the dog "`~ in question has been vaccinated against rabies as required by section 5-66. When the license is issued, such certificate shall be so marked and returned .............................. .............................. to the dog's ' owner. ........................ (b) A dog license shall consist of a license tax ......................... ........................ 12 receipt and a tag made of twenty-gauge metal or other suitable material in a rectangular shape one-half inch in width and two (2) inches in length, with a one-eighth inch hole at each end. (c) The receipt issued pursuant to this section shall have recorded thereon the name and address of the owner or custodian of the dog ''?s'~ the date of payment, the year for which the license is issued, the serial number of the tag and whether the license is receipt and a tag made of twenty-gauge metal or other suitable material two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in diameter, stamped or otherwise permanently marked, showing "Roanoke County, Va. Kennel .. ed 'ch issu ~~~ for whi Ta the calendar ear?'~`~>`rir`:~~~`>.<~.;?~ . the number of dogs and a serial number. sec. 5-49. Preservation and exhibition of license receipt. ...................... A dog ~ti°~?~??'~ license receipt shall be carefully preserved by the person to whom it is issued and exhibited promptly on request for inspection by the animal control officer or any other officer. Sec. 5-50. Taq to be worn by doq; exceptions. (a) A dog license tag shall be securely fastened to a substantial collar by the owner or custodian of the dog and worn by such dog. It shall be unlawful for the owner or custodian to 13 permit any licensed dog four (4) months old or over to run at large at any time without a license tag. (b) The owner of a dog may remove the collar and license tag required by this section when the dog is engaged in lawful hunting; when the dog is competing in a dog show; when the dog has a skin condition which would be exacerbated by the wearing of a collar; when the dog is confined; or when the dog is under the immediate control of its owner. (c) Any dog t not wearing a collar bearing a license tag of the proper calendar year shall prima facie be deemed to be unlicensed, and in any proceeding under this article, the burden of proof of the fact that such dog ~t has been licensed or is otherwise not required to bear a tag at the time shall be on the ....................... ...................... owner of the dog Sec. 5-51. Unlawful removal of tag. It shall be unlawful for any person, except the owner or custodian, to remove a legally acquired license tag from a dog Sec. 5-52. Duplicate tags. ....................... If a dog `~`~'c~L license tag shall become lost, destroyed or stolen, the owner or custodian shall at once apply to the county treasurer for a duplicate license tag, presenting the original license receipt. Upon affidavit of the owner or custodian before the treasurer that the original license tag has been lost, destroyed or stolen, he shall issue a duplicate license tag, which the owner or custodian shall immediately affix to the collar of the 14 dog. The treasurer shall endorse the number of the duplicate and the date issued on the face of the original license receipt. The fee for a duplicate tag shall be one dollar ($1.00). Sec. 5-53. Records of licenses sold. A list of all dog `< licenses and kennel licenses sold shall be made in triplicate, consecutively numbered, and showing to whom issued; residence address; magisterial district; tag number; year ending; day, month and year issued; and the signature of the county treasurer. The original copy shall be delivered to the dog s owner, the second copy shall be retained by the treasurer ....................... ....................... ....................... and the third copy shall be delivered to animal control officer. Sec. 5-54. Disposition of unsold tags. Unsold dog and cad license tags for the preceding calendar year shall be disposed of by the county treasurer after verification by a certified public accountant employed by the board of supervisors to audit the records and accounts of the county for the fiscal year next ending. 2. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after July 1, 1994. On amended motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance as drafted with the addition of paragraph 4, Sec. 5-45, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 15 cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation 16 - - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - - APPE CE RE VEST =_ -_ Q - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS - - _ _ SUBJECT: ~{ l -~ ~~ , _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ -' WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. - Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c = with the clerk. _ -_ _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ - _ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - NAME ~/ ~J - - _ - P U2 ail /~-a r l~crJ' ~y ~ - - - - - - -_ __ e ADDRESS G/~ ~~ ,.-, _ - _ __ = PHONE ~~q - ~S-~" a = m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~ (Ulllll~lllllllllilllllllllillllllllll~llllillililillllllllli~illlllliilllllllliillllllllllllllllllllilllilllliilllilllilllllill - I~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ = - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - APPE - - CE REQUEST = _ _ -PUBLIC FEARING RDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS 1 r - _. ~ _. - _ SUBJECT: ~ 1 / )7~ ~ ~~' ~. - s - ~. - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - - ^ Each s esker will be - P given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do €~therwise. - _ - - .- ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c vnth the clerk. - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - e - HALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - __ -_ s - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - ~; - - NAME ~ ~ ~ ~ ._..7 - - ~ - ~ _ - - ° ADDRE~ '" - - _ - _ - - _ c PHONE c - _ c Ililllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllillillillilllliilililllllilllllilllllllllilllllllllllllil~"' J ~ f ` \ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE 41294-8 AIITHORIZING THE ACQIIISITION OF A PERMANENT ACCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-IIP EASEMENT FROM LAYTON DE THOMAS AND SANDRA N. THOMAS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIBIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE WHEREAS, in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill and in order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame as set out in the "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action," it is necessary to acquire a permanent access and environmental cleanup easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Layton De Thomas and Sandra N. Thomas, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.02-2-3; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke" dated April 30, 1993, and revised May 12, 1993, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 15, page 111; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from Layton De and Sandra N. Thomas for the sum of $500.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 1994; and the second reading was held on April 12, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Layton De Thomas and Sandra N. Thomas a permanent access and environmental clean-up easement, as shown on the plat recorded in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 111, for an amount not to exceed $500.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT ACCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP EASEMENT FROM LAYTON DE THOMAS AND SANDRA N. THOMAS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second authorize acquisition of access and environmental Caverns Landfill site, therefrom to the Roanoke BACKGROUND' reading of a permanent clean-up in and several River. the proposed ordinance to easement for purposes of connection with the Dixie unnamed drainages flowing In August of 1992, Roanoke County executed an "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action" with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to perform a removal response action at the Dixie Caverns landfill site. This removal response action includes work to remove stream sediments containing heavy metal contaminants: lead, cadmium and zinc, which may have been released from the site. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to comply with EPA regulations and standards, and perform the required removal response action, it is necessary to acquire a permanent access and environmental cleanup easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Layton De Thomas and Sandra N. Thomas. Staff has negotiated with the property owner for purchase of the necessary easement for the sum of $500.00, subject ~+ -a to approval by the Board of Supervisors. The easement to be acquired is more particularly described as follows: A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, to construct, install, operate, inspect, use, maintain, remove, repair or replace certain improvements,. and a perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT for access to and from several unnamed drainages flowing from the Buyer's Dixie Caverns Landfill site to the Roanoke River and related improvements, for any purpose in connection with the environmental clean-up of Dixie Caverns Landfill, in accordance with all federal, state, and/or local mandates and requirements, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantors, acquired by deed dated February 24, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1393, page 1339, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.02-2-3. The location of said easement is shown and designated as and "NEW VARIABLE WIDTH ACCESS EASEMENT", and "CENTERLINE OF NEW 30' ACCESS EASEMENT" on Sheet 4 of that certain plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke" dated April 30, 1993, and revised May 12, 1993, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 15, page 111, said plat being by reference incorporated herein. FISCAL IMPACTS' The purchase price of $500.00 for the permanent easement would be paid from the available funds in the Dixie Caverns Account. ALTERNATIVES' Alternative Number 1: Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a permanent access and environmental clean-up easement from Layton De and Sandra N. Thomas in connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. Alternative Number 2: Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance and direct staff to initiate eminent domain proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative Number 1. ~+~a Respectfully submitted, i- Vicki L. Huf n Assistant Count Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs {~- a• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT ACCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP EASEMENT FROM LAYTON DE THOMAS AND SANDRA N. THOMAS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE WHEREAS, in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill and in order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame as set out in the "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action," it is necessary to acquire a permanent access and environmental cleanup easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Layton De Thomas and Sandra N. Thomas, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.02-2-3; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke" dated April 30, 1993, and revised May 12, 1993, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 15, page 111; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from Layton De and Sandra N. Thomas for the sum of $500.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 1994; and the second reading was held on April 12, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: I7 w~ 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Layton De Thomas and Sandra N. Thomas a permanent access and environmental clean-up easement, as shown on the plat recorded in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 111, for an amount not to exceed $500.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 RESOLUTION 41294-9 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 12, 1994 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994, and March 22, 1994. 2. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Roanoke Valley Prisoners of War Chapter. 3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Star Quilters Guild. 4. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Delta Kappa Sorority of Epsilon Sigma Alpha. 5. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the North Cross School. 6. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag Club) 7. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Catawba Valley Ruritan Club. 8. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.19 Miles of Arabian Lane into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 9. Approval of Resolution Supporting Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. (RADAR) in Their Application for Section 18 Monies for Transportation in Rural Areas. 10. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121. 11. Request for Acceptance of Funds from the Compensation Board to Purchase Personal Computers. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gerald Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Bingo/Raffle File February 22, 1994 9 -~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 22, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called tre meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERB ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Dr. Michael Nevl' Colonial Presbyterian Church. ing, The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. February 22, 1994 93 Craig, Utility Director) The presentation was made by Utility Director Cliff Craig, John Bradshaw, from Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc., and Ted Petoski, Project Manager. Mr. Craig announced that they will begin pumping water into the reservoir on March 4 at 10:00 a.m. He invited the supervisors to attend the event. IN RE: NEW BUSINE83 1. Report and Recommendation on Storm Related Damage to County Facilities. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) Mr. Hodge reported that as a result of the recent ice storm, the County has experienced unanticipated expenses of $67,013. There is also a need for repairs to roofs at some County buildings, and there may be additional overtime costs to collect bulk and brush. He advised that he would bring back a report and request for funding on March 8, 1994. The report will also include costs for roof repairs to the schools. ?. Recuest from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for Approval of the 1994 95 Budcet and Pro osed Capital Expenditures. (Diane Hyatt, _ Director of Finance) R-2229~l-1 Ms. Hyatt advised that the Regional Airport Commission is required to submit their budget to the Roanoke County Board of February 22, 1994 Commission as set forth in the February 9, 1994, report of the Commission Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 3. Revuest for Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Hollins North Count L b a Exuansion and Renovation. (Spencer Watts, Library Directorf A-22294-2 Mr. Watts advised that sealed bids for the Hollins/North County Library project were opened on January 18. Lucas Construction submitted the low bid, and based on reviews by Procurement, the Architect and subcontractors, the project should be awarded to them. The bid of $931, 875 is within the budgeted amount. Mr. Watts recommended that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the construction contract to Lucas Construction. i Supervisor Johnson moved to award the contract to Lucas February 22, 1994 ~~ renegotiated contract with Valley Soccer Club for use of the Merriman Fields. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: REQIIEST FOR PIIBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first readings of the ordinances, and set the second readings for March 22, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 1. Ordinance authorizin a S ecial IIse Permit to operate a Convenience Store, Located at the Corner of Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue in the Cave SDrinQ Magisterial District IIpon the Petition of Workman oil Company. 2. Ordinance to Rezone 3.6 Acres from R-1 to I-1 in Order to Correct a Zonin Ma Error and Brin an EuistinQ IIse into Zoning Conformity, Located at 8223 Reservoir Road in the Hollins Ma isterial District Tau Ma Numbers 27.08-3-1 -2 -3 -4 5, and -6) IIDOn the Petition of the Roanoke County Plannin commission. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizin the Tem orar Relocation of the Pollinc Place for the Hollins voting Precinct from the Hollins Librar to the North Roanoke February 22, 1994 ~~ located along Virginia Route No. 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead and underground line across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the baseball field, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3021, dated November 29, 1993, and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 8, 1994; and a second reading was held on February 22, 1994. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County~s Starkey Park development. 3. That donation of a right-of-way, fifteen feet February 22, 1994 101 Older Americans. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-22494-5 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution with Item 7 removed. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None Regarding Item 7, a Bingo Permit for the Blue Ridge Council for the Blind, Robert Hoel, a member of the organization advised that the Blue Ridge Council will not operate bingo games in Roanoke City if the permit is approved by the County. Supervisor Johnson moved to continue this item until the issues are resolved regarding the Commissioner of the Revenue's recommendation to deny the permit. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. RESOLIITION 22294-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED A8 ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 22, 1994, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, .approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through ~ 6, inclusive, as follows: February 22, 1994 Supervisor Nickens• (1) He announced that the Social Services Department had hired a Fraud Investigator. He asked Ms. Green to handle publicity regarding the new position. (2) He received a letter from Rebecca Farmer recommending that the County sponsor a children's festival. He asked for Board consensus to have Parks and Recreation Director Pete Haislip review. (3) He asked about plans for the Soccer fields at Vinyard Park. Mr. Chambliss advised that the Roanoke Valley Soccer Association has begun development and is working with the City on the concept plan. Supervisor Minnix• (1) He announced that Clean Valley Day will be held on April 16 and volunteers are need to participate in the cleanup. Supervisor Eddv• (1) He announced that he, Mr. Mahoney and Mr. Hodge met with the Roanoke Valley legislators in Richmond and attended VACO/VML Day activities. (2) He announced that the Roanoke Valley officials had signed a joint statement of support for the I-73 route through the Roanoke Valley, and that officials will be meeting with the federal congressional delegation on Thursday, February 24, 1994, in Washington. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Minnix moved to receive and file the following reports with Item 9 removed for discussion later in the meeting. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. February 22, 1994 105 IN RE: E%ECIITIVE SESSION At 5:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 A (3) To discuss the disposition of publicly held property located on Rutrough Road, (7) To discuss the condemnation of real property for public utility purposes, water transmission line; (7) to discuss the acquisition of real estate on behalf of the IDA and legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECIITIVE SESSION R-22294-6 At 7:06 p.m., supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 22294-6 CERTIFYING E$ECIITIVE MEETING WAB HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and February 22, 1994 107 IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to Elicit Citizen Comment on the Following: a. To Set a Real Estate Tax Rate of Not More than 51.13 ner 5100 Assessed valuation. David Courey, 3419 Ashmeade Drive, Roanoke, spoke in opposition to the increased assessment of property and suggested that the tax rate be decreased to $1.05. 2?. To Set a Personal Pro ert Tax Rate of Not More than 53.50 per $100 Assessed valuation. There were no citizens requesting to speak on this issue. a. To Set a Machiner and Tools Tax of Not More than S3.oo per 5100 Assessed valuation. There were no citizens requesting to speak on this issue. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.5 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 Located in the 6300 Block on the South Side of Peters Creek Road Hollins Magisterial District, IIuon the Petition of J. Edward Conner and Car M. and Shirle I. Cunnin ham. Terr Harrin ton Director of Pla=q ~ Zonin February 22, 1994 109 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.5 acres, as described herein, and located on the south side of the 6300 block of Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Numbers 27.13-5-8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 33, 34 and half of 32) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of J. Edward Conner and Cary M. and Shirley I. Cunningham. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive (50' wide) 100 ft. easterly from the east line of Lot 11 of the R. E. Dillard Farm Map; thence leaving East Drive and with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 deg. 02' W. 308.69 feet to a point on the southerly side of Virginia Highway Route 117; thence with the same, N. 72 deg. 20' E. 227.41 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia highway Route 117 and with the westerly line of Lot 9, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 161.50 feet to a point on the northerly line of Lots 25 and 26, N. 63 deg. 58' E. 50.00 feet to a point; thence with a line through the center of Lot 26, S. 26 deg. 02' E. 150.00 feet to a point on the northerly side of East Drive; thence with the same, S. 63 deg. 58' W. 225.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and being all of Lots 2 through 8, all of Lots 22 through 25, and the westerly one-half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of Roanoke County in Plat Book 2, page 169. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this - February 22, 1994 111 NAYS: None ORDINANCE 22294-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.43 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4037 ELECTRIC ROAD (TA8 MAP NOB. 87.07-1-39, 40, AND 41) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF A & M ENTERPRISES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 25, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.43 acres, as described herein, and located at 4037 Electric Road, (Tax Map Number 87.07-1-39, 40, and 41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of A & M Enterprises LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as February 22, 1994 113 reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 3. An Ordinance Authorizin a s ecial IIse Permit for an Accessor A artment Located at 4925 Bower Road Windsor Hills Ma isterial District II on the Petition of Charles. Coo er. Terr Harrin ton Director of Planninq & Zonincf 0-22294-9 Mr. Harrington reported that this request will allow an accessory apartment attached to a single family residence. The petitioner has indicated that the apartment would only be used by family members and guests and is not intended for rent to the general public. This request was heard by the Board of Zoninq Appeals in September 1993 when Mr. Cooper filed an appeal that the unit was a guest cottage and not an accessory apartment. The BZA ruled in Mr Cooper's favor. The BZA reconsidered its action at their November meeting and upheld the zoning administrator's decision that the unit was an accessory apartment. Mr. Cooper is now requesting a special use permit to make the apartment legal in an R-1 district. Dr. Willis P. Lanier, Jr., 4743 Woodley Drive, Roanoke, e~ February 22, 1994 115 on this matter on February 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 14, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 22, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to establish an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of $ 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Charles Cooper to construct an accessory apartment located at 4925 Bower Road (Tax Map Nos. 76.07-3-13 and 14) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, with the following conditions: a) The accessory apartment shall only be occupied a~df~+r-L-.,~a by family members related to the owner/occupant of the principal residential dwelling on the property. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with condition amended excluding reference to rental, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy February 22, 1994 117 WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and, WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and, WHEREAS, the company desires to support these economic development efforts of the County and the Authority by relocating and establishing its corporate facilities in the County. WHEREAS, the County desires to support these economic development efforts of the Industrial Development Authority by donating public funds to the Industrial Development Authority in accordance with the provisions of § 15.1-511.1 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, on January 3, 1994, the Board appropriated and donated the sum of $272,500 to the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County for the purpose of acquiring 15 acres of real estate on State Route 601, Hollins Road, from the Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation; and, WHEREAS, on January 11, 1994, the Board authorized and approved the execution of a Performance Agreement by the County February 22, 1994 119 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2. Request for Appropriation to Fund the Study of the 3trateaic Location and Replacement Policy for Fire and Rescue Equipment A-22294-11 Mr. Chambliss reported that as part of the Vehicle Replacement Policy Study, the Board requested an evaluation of the replacement and allocation of fire and rescue equipment. It is recommended that David M. Giffith & Associates Inc. be awarded a contract for the study at a cost of $12,500. Mr. Chambliss advised that the Fire and Rescue chiefs will be consulted during the study, and the study will concluded in time to be included in the budget process. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve funding of $12,500 from the Board Contingency Fund instead of the Unappropriated Balance as recommended in the Board Report. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ZN RE: STATIIS REPORT ON RECYCLING Assistant County Administrator Don Myers reported that there is an 89~ participation in commingled recycling and 45$ Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S•W• Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 8, 1994 Virginia, met The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, oke County Administration Center, this being the this day at the Roan of the month Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting second of March, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER m, The Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:04 p• roll call was taken. Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman EdH a Odel] Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, MEMBERS PRESENT: 11 „ Minnix, Harry C. Nickens Fuzzy MEMBERS A88ENT; None Administrator; Paul M Elmer C. Hodge, County H, Allen, Clerk gTp~gg PRESENT: Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary Assistant County AdministratoZ John M. Chambliss, Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant community Relations Anne Marie Green, Director, IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES invocation was given by the Reverend Steven w• The tist Children's Home. The Pledge of Allegiance was Harr ins , Bap 1 all present. recited by AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2. Rectuest for Approval of Resolution Adopting the Personal Pro ert Tag Rate and Machine and Tools Tag Rate. (Brent Robertson Budget Mana er R-3894-2 There was no discussion. The public hearing was held on February 22, 1994. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution setting the personal property tax rate at $3.50 per $100 of assessed valuation and the machinery and tools tax rate at $3.00 per $100 of assessed valuation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLUTION 3894-2 SETTING THE TA% LEVY ON ALL COANORE COUNTY OR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1994 IN R BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1994, and ending December 31, 1994, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of 3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal be, and beginning January 1, 1994, and ending December 31, 1994, hereby is, set for a tax rate of 3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ttAlated Damage to 3. Request for Funds for Storm Hodge, Count4 Count Facilities (Elmer C• Administrator) A-3894-3 Mr. Hodge advised that he would prefer to absorb the expenses in the current budget at this time with the understanding that some departments may overrun their budget. 1 storm related expenses from The total expenses were: ( ) December and January - $68,663 including a police cruiser which was covered by insurance; (2) increased utility costs - $11,800; (3) requests for roof replacements at $148,000 and generators for fire and rescue facilities at $300,000 and (4) school weather related expenses of $26,700. Mr. Hodge advised that the roof replacements and generators would be included for consideration lights. Following discussion, Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the agreement and authorize Mr. Mahoney and Mr. Hodge to meet with VACo/VML and APCO to discuss differences identified in rates, as well as other storm-related issues. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 3894-4 APPROVING AND AIITHORIZING THE E%ECIITION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PIIRCHASE OF ELECTRICITY FROM APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Appalachian Power Company desire to enter into a three year agreement commencing July 1, 1993 for the purchase of electricity for public purposes; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke County has benefitted from the professional assistance and expertise of the Virginia Municipal League and Virginia Association of Counties Steering Committee in negotiating an agreement for electricity with Appalachian Power Company for political subdivisions and public authorities in this service area; and, WHEREAS, the VML/VACo Steering Committee strongly recommends the agreement negotiated, since the rates negotiated by it result in significant savings for all participating localities; and, WHEREAS, this agreement establishes rates for general Cats to Increase the Board Fee for Im ounded Animals, and to Define Certain Acts Committed by Animals as Nuisances and Prescribin Penalties Therefore. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) Mr, Obenshain advised that this proposed ordinance would accomplish several changes to the County animal code. The primary amendments are: (1) require licensure of cats at the same terms and fees as currently required for dogs; (2) add cats to the appropriate code sections and define animal nuisance; (3) create a three year animal license tax or fee; and (4) approve the rate increase for animal shelter at the SPCA to $6.00 per day. The following individuals spoke regarding the proposed ordinance: i. Mori Cochenar 3230 Woodland Drive S.W. asked for reconsideration of allowing two unneutered cats unless they are cat breeders, expressed support for the tiered licensing costs and suggested a public information campaign. 2. Gary R. Greer, 3636 Bennett Springs Road, expressed concern about the lack of animal control officers to handle dog complaints and felt the staff should resolve that problem first. Individual Board members expressed concern about portions of the proposed ordinance, the possible increase in i NAYS: None IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-3894-5 Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the Consent Resolution with Item 3 removed for discussion and separate vote. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 3.a Re est for a royal of a Bin o Permit from the Blue Rid a Council of the Blind Inc. Ms. Brenda Duncan, 823 Clearwater expressed her concern that the County is not enforcing the current laws regarding Bingo Permits and was concerned that more organizations would move their bi ngo operations to the County. Supervisor Eddy moved to app rove Item 3. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: Supervisor Nickens RESOLIITION 3894-5 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN AGENDA FOR ITEMS SET FORTH ON THS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - CONSENT AGENDA THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board On motion of Supervisor Eddy to approve Item #3, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: Supervisor Nickens ' IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson: (1) He announced that there was a groundbreaking ceremony at the Hollins Library and thanked the staff for their planning and participation. (2) He complimented the staff for their efforts during the recent ice storms. Supervisor Rohinke: (1) He advised that the Catawba area will be getting automated refuse collection and there was a 50/50 acceptance of the program. Concerns included long driveways making it difficult to bring the cart to the road. He asked the staff to look at implementation in rural areas. (3) He asked about the joint meeting with Vinton. Mr. Hodge asked the Board members for dates that they would be available for the meeting. Supervisors Nickens: (1) He announced that the Explore opening date has been extended to July 1, 1994, at 10 a.m. (2) He advised that he received a letter from APCO. He asked for an update from APCO on their plans to avoid problems from ice storms in the future. Mr. Hodge advised that APCO officials would like to attend a Board meeting in the future to present a video. (3) He advised that he read the Economic Development Activity Booklet and was pleased with the increased efforts to attract new business and industries. Supervisor Eddv: (1) He announced that he and Mr. Recommendations for Revenue Sharing. Mr. Covey announced that a public hearing on the Six Year Plan is scheduled for April 26, 1994. IN RE: dinner. RECESS At 6.20 p.m. Chairman Eddy declared a recess for EVENING SESSION IN RE: RECONVENEMENT At 7:05 p.m. Chairman Eddy reconvened the meeting. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINGB 1. Public Hearing to Elicit Comments RecardinG the Fiscal Year 1994/95 Budget There were no citizens present to speak. Supervisor Nickens moved to close the public hearing. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES i. Ordinance Authorizin the Tem ora Relocation of the Polliny Place for the Hollins Voting Precinct from the Hollins Libra to the North Roanoke Baptist Church (Paul Mahoney~ County Attorne~LL 0-3894-6 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS' C01~4IENT8 AND COMMt1NICATIONB 1. Concerned Citizens of Catawba Valley to sneak on Proyosed Interstate 73. Mr. Hodge updated the Board and audience of action taken regarding the proposed Interstate 73 route through the Catawba Valley (Alternate 6). He advised that the Virginia Department of Transportation had ranked all of the proposed routes for the interstate, and this alternate ranked 5th. When cost figures were included, the route fell to 11th out of 12 alternates. Bud Oakey, with the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, advised that he discussed this alternate with Secretary of Transportation Robert Martinez, and Secretary Martinez felt that the route through the Catawba Valley was ranked so low that it would not be considered. Nine citizens spoke in opposition to Interstate 83 March 22, 1994 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 22, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 1994. IN gy; CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERB PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens ~~ERg p~ggg~ ; None STAFF pREgE~; Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County _ Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend William L. Ross, March 22, 1994 community, Mr. Sanderson has demonstrated his dedication and commitment to Roanoke County and to the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its deep appreciation to ARMAND LEE SANDERSON for his service on the Roanoke County Electoral Board and for his commitment to the people of Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for Mr. Sanderson on the occasion of his retirement from the Electoral Board. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2. Resolution of Welcome to Rita Levit Visitin Teacher from Riev. IIkraine. R-32294-2 Chairman Eddy presented Ms. Levit with the resolution and a gift from Roanoke County. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 32294-2 OF WELCOME TO RITA LEVIT, VISITING TEACHER FROM RIEV, IIRRAINE March 22, 1994 Chairman Eddy presented the proclamation to Ruth Santopolo, President, and Hugh Clark, Program Chairman, Roanoke Chapter, National Association of Purchasing Management (NAPM), and Elaine Carver, Director of Procurement. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the proclamation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: BRIEFING 1. Briefin on Roanoke Valle Resource Authorit Solid Waste Facilities. (John Hubbard, CEO, RV'RA Mr. Hubbard advised that the Transfer Station is complete, the Tipper Station is 97$ complete, and the landfill is scheduled to open on April 8, 1994. IN RE: NEW BUSIN888 1. Resolution Re estin VDOT to Ado t a Recommended List o_f Primarv and Interstate Protects for the Six year (Arnold Covey. Engineering & Improvement Program. Inspections Director) R-32294-3 Mr. Covey advised that the County needs to adopt a list of Interstate and Primary Projects to be presented to the Virginia Department of Transportation at a Preallocation Hearing for Fiscal March 22, 1994 secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following is a list of the recommended Primary and Interstate Projects for inclusion by the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Improvement Program for the 1994-95 Fiscal Year: 1, Route I-81 - increase the number of north and south bound travel lanes, improvement of all interchanges and consider the construction of an additional interchange between Wildwood Road (Route 619) and the interchange at Dixie Caverns (Route 460). - continuation of 2. Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) improvements to Route 221 from Crystal Creek Road to Route 752 (Old Mill Road) for a distance of approximately 2.3 miles. - continuation of 3. Route 115 (Plantation Road) improvements south to the Roanoke City Limits to the four lane section of Plantation Road or, in the alternative, consideration of the construction of a segment between the Roanoke City limits and Hershberger Road. 4. Route 11 (Williamson Road) - the widening of Route 11 from the Roanoke City Corporate limits north to Route 117 to include improvements to the existing bridge structure over Carvins Creek and the realignment of Florist Road to Route 11. 5, Route 11/460 (West Main Street) - continuation of the four laving of Route 11 to the existing four lane section of Route 647 (Dow Hollow Road). March 22, 1994 ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first readings of ordinances, and set the second readings and public hearings for April 26, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 1. Ordinance to Rezone ,3 *118 vRrm t fto AllopaforPExoansion District II on the Petition of Stora a Bins Inc. 2. Shifflette. s} *~ Erect a 3. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Per"' of Broadcasting Touter. Located .4 Mile ~A N t Drive. a .. vn~A and Ai ofrCentury Roanoke Cellular Cor . 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Erect of Broadcasting Toper, Located Beyond the Te Enchanted Lane. Cave Spring Magisterial Distr;ct. Upon the Petition of Century Roanoke Cellular Cory. 5. ordinance Ameadin and Reenactin Portions of Ordinance _ by 82592 12•ion ofd Certain rAmendments tooSaid O d uaty e the A~~tt IN RE: FZRST READING OF ORDINANCES ~. ordinance Authorizin the Ac isitioa of a Permanent Access and Environmental Clean-IIp Easement from Layton De Thomas and Sandra H. Thomas in Connection pith the Dixie Caverns Landfill Bite. (Paul M. Mahoney. County March 22, 1994 separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of January 25, 1994, and February 8, 1994 Minutes. 2. Donation of a dDPronect. Easement in Connection with Camney Lane Roa 7 3. Request from the School Board for Appropriation of $500 to the School Grant Fund. 4. Request for Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Mason's Cove PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Minnix: He advised that in response to a citizen's complaint about bingo games, he met with the citizen, Mr. Mahoney, and Skip Burkart, and they are researching the situation. SuQervisor Johnson: (1) He advised that he and Supervisor Minnix attended an all-day workshop at the Roanoke Regional Airport last week. He reported that a response from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to the Part 150 Noise Study will probably be March 22, 1994 Fire & Rescue Reaction/Response Times ~. Bond Proiect Status Report 8. Report on 1991 Water Protects. Cliff Craig, Utility Director, briefed the Board on an operational problem. Supervisor Minnix moved to receive and file Item 8. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session. Mr. Hodge and Brent Robertson, Budget Manager, presented the Board with budget books, and there was discussion of the following to ics: (1) Department Work Programs and Equipment Requests; (2) P Contributions to Social Services and Cultural Agencies; (3) Dues and Per Capita Allocations; (4) Contributions to Human Service Agencies; (5) Proposed State Funding and Summary of State Budget Proposals; and (6) Vehicle Inventory Report. It was the consensus of the Board to have an additional Board Meeting on April 5, 1994, for a joint budget work session with the School Board and for other budget work sessions. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and will be held in the Fourth Floor Conference Raom at the Roanoke County Administration Center. During the discussion, the Board members requested the following• (1) that a copy of the School Board budget be made available as soon as possible; (2) that staff provide more March 22, 1994 At 7:05 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLOTION 32294-6ECCODE OFN IRG~INIA I~ ~ETIN(3 WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH TH WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by t~ following recorded vote: March 22, 1994 reach their driveways or the roads; and WHEREAS, David Asher, David Baril and Jack Doyle, all seniors at Cave Spring High School in Roanoke County, spent the night and early morning hours during that storm removing and cutting trees, timber and branches, using their own equipment, and on their own initiative, so that the residents would be able to use their automobiles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby express its deep appreciation to DAVID ASHER, DAVID BARIL AND JACK DOYLE for their initiative, their generosity, and their thoughtfulness in coming to the aid and assistance of their neighbors. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINti AND BBCOND RBADIN(; OF OgDINANC88 1. ordinance Authorisin a s ecial IIse Permit to Construct a Church Located at the Southwest Intersection of Merrimac Road and cartwriaht Drive, Cave 8~rina Maaiaterial District, IIoon the Petition ot_churah of the Holy svirit. (Terry Harrington. Director o! Planning and Sonina) 0-32294-5 March 22, 1994 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 14, 1993; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 22, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use penait to allow the construction of a church building to be located at the southwest intersection of Merriman Road and Cartwright Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Trustees of the Church of the Holy Spirit to allow the construction of a church building located at the southwest intersection of Merriman Road and Cartwright Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, subject to the following conditions: a) Owner/developer is to prepare the siand Roanoke accord with the VA Dept. of F the t P County guidelines regarding rotection of existing trees. This tree protection plan will be established during site plan review and put ratio effect prior to the beginning of preliminary g ing. b) The Merriman Road entrance will be the only access to the site. c) Applicant shall be required to connect to public water and sewer service. d) A total of 22 parking spaces, shown on concept plan nearest rear yard border of 5959 Barbara March 22, 1994 159 public utility easement located on Tax Parcel 94.02-2-21.19 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Deed Book 1246 at page 1277 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 8 , 1994 ; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 22, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 15-foo~ public utility easement located on Tax Parcel 94.02-2-21.19 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Deed Book 1246 at page 1277, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Keith A. and Diane N. Custer shall record a certi- fied copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and March ZZ, 1994 are no changes being proposed to the existing building or site, and the existing entrances have a grandfathered status under the zoning ordinance. He advised that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the petition. Don Baker, Vice President of Workman Oil Company, was present to answer questions. He advised Supervisor Johnson that gasoline will be sold, and that the company is committed to cleaning up the well contamination problem at the site. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 32294-10 GRANTING A BPECIAL II8E PERMIT TO WORRM.~iN OIL COMPANY TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A CONVENIENCB STORE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF ROIITE 419 AND BRAMBLETON AVENIIE (TA% PARCEL 77.13-5-41), CAVE SPRING MAGIBTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Workman Oil Company has filed a petition to allow the operation of a convenience store on property located at the corner of Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 22, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 22, 1994. March 22, 1994 use into zoning conformity. He zoning map error and bring an existing advised that the owner of the property has requested that this rezoning be done at this time. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 32294-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLABSIFZCATION OF A 3.6-ACRE TRACT OF REAL EBTATE LOCATED AT 8223 ggBERVOIR ROAD (TA% MAP NOB. 27.08-3-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) IN THE HOLLZNB MAGIBTERZAL DISTRICT R iOM TO THTBHE ZONING CLABBIFICATION OF CLA88IFICATION OF I-1 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOlCB COIINTY PLAN~TZNG COMMI88ZON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 22, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 22, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 1, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,. Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.6 acres, as described herein, and located at 8223 Reservoir Road (Tax Map Number 27.08-3-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District to the zoning March 22, 1994 Mr. Chambliss advised that since the first reading of this ordinance on March 8, 1994, staff has considered comments made by residents and suggestions made by Board members. He recommended that the public hearing be held at this meeting, and that the final document brought back to the Board on April 12, 1994. The following citizens spoke concerning this ordinance: 1, Glenda McCormack, 619 Magnolia Road - questioned whether the County could enforce the cat ordinance when it cannot enforce the dog ordinance. 2. Millie Butler, 6932 Campbell Drive - asked for a firm ordinance to address the nuisance issue and did not want a grandfather clause. 3. Judy Pyska, 213 Spring Avenue - President and Founder, Roanoke Valley Animal Foundatioi: - spoke in favor of mandatory spading and neutering animals. 4. Neil Angle, 3816 Green Valley Drive - advised that he felt the County should not pass an ordinance it could not enforce. 5. Mary Welch, 1836 Maiden Lane, SW - a member of the Animal Overpopulation Task Force, felt that cats and dogs should be licensed and required to wear tags especially due to the threat of rabies. 6. Lela Spitz, 1917 Oak Drive Extension - felt that the County's Animal Control Ordinance needs to be completely redrawn rather than amended, and gave several suggestions for a stronger ordinance. March 22, 1994 The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EgECIITIVE SESSION R-32294-12 At 9:05 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RE8OLIITION 32294-12 CODEIOFIVIRQI~NIA I~ MEETINd WA8 HELD IN CONFORKITY WITH THE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive x,_41294-9.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAR COUNTY UADMINI TRATIONRC LATER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 NDA ITEM• Request for Approval of a Raffle P Wrmit from tas AGE Chapter, Roanoke Valley Prisoners of War ( American Ex part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Prisoners of War COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SCARY OF INFORMATION: ermit to hold a The Roanoke Valley POW Chapter has requested a p 21, 1994. This application has raffle in Roanoke County on May been reviewed with the Commissi cation is on ufile dinethecClerk's that it be approved. The apple Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the It POW Chapter be approved. Roanoke Valley APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: 1 ~~-~~ ~" Elmer C. odge Mary H. Allen County Administrator Clerk to the Board ----------------------- -------------- VOTE ------- ACTION No Yes Abs Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Approved (X) Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix x To ( ) _ Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File _- RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICAT 7a ame permit. This made for a raffl and State laws, rules, Application is hereby ect to all County be enacted application is made subj or that may ordinances, and regulations now in force, the undersigned hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by t and officers of the organization and which shall be applican ermit is issued. deemed a condition under which this p re ulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et~.se of Raffle games are strictly g inia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. the criminal statutes of theCodeg These laws authorize the r ornto se of the Roanoke County ation p Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable inaayslfrom the filing a raffle permit. The Board hasermt The Board may deny, granting rant or deny the p of an application to g ermit of any organization found not to be suspend, or revoke the p and state law. in strict compliance with counttY ~ ,/ ~ Name of Organization ~~'oy~~- ~• \., ~ ,> /-~-~1' ''fie.-~.~.eR.tJ... (~,,rl.rt. . ~.c.. Mailing Address ~ ~~` v ~~ Zip Code ~ ~' City, state, ~~ When was the organization founded? J anization ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ f/ ~~, Purpose and Type of Org -~ ~ ° f or two Has the organization been in a NOstenc~in Roanoke County continuous years? YES_______ ------ rofit? YES / NO__ Is the organization non-p anization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Is the org Code? YES_- NO-~' licable) Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If app anization understand that any organization found in Does your org Bingo and Raffle ordinance or Section 18.2- violation of the County inia authorizing this permit is 340.10 et. se of the Cer~itfrevoked and any person, shareholder, subject to having such p anization who violates the agent, member or employee of such org be guilty of a felony? above referenced Codes may our organization understand that it musts tain ng to Raffle Does y is and disbursements p the complete records of receip ect to audit bY. games and that such records are subj Commissioner of the Revenue? P.O. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, ~ ~ + ROANOKE, VA 24018 COMMISSIONER OF THE 1 0 our organization understand th ers t is a violation of la ~ to on or firm, association, Does Y contract with anY P ursuan enter into a ualified organization P oration organization (other than another Q artnership, or corp ur ose of organizing, § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia , P classification whatsoever, for the p P ', of any Raffles ? J ^~ managing, or ceniuctiny ESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO HE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: D tion Fair Market Value Article Descrip 1 ~ ~ i ~ ~~~ L9L' ~ ~ (.T i v ~~ /OD ~~ 'Z-1 `~ sL DATE OF RAFFLE list below all If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, dates raffles will be held. iy/A S ecific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? P /J/~. ermit shah be valid only for the above location. NOTE. Th~s P a ermit to conduct bingo games or raffles Any organization holding P ercent (12.50 of its gross receipts shall use twelve and one-half P oses for which the m all bingo games or raffles oral Pu P e lawful religious, fro community or educate Code charitable, chartered or organized. (County ecifically will be organization es ecifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s)roceeds. §4-101) State sp Tanned or intended use of the p used. List in detail the p Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~~~oa T~ /~ ca ~`~~ p,0. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGIN~A ROANOKE, VA COMIVIISSIONER OF TIIE REVENUE 24018 a Officers of ~~.~.~.; ' - ~-~ nt~ he organization: V ~ v- Address: ~ _/~ ~y~3~v3I Vice President: Address:- Secretary: Address:- Treasurer : v~~ ~_ Phone: Phone: Phone : ( ~/'a 3~ ~f~9 - •Z~ 33 Address: v °'""' ible for Raffle operations: Member authorized to be res Name : -- ~ ~~~ Home Address Phone Bus Phone financial report required by the code Member responsible for filing if your organization ceases to exist: Name: Home Address Phone Bus Phone or anization understand that it c lthebrequest of the Does your g furnish a ermofethelRevenue?ts membership uP Commisai~n or anization attached a check for the annual permiee in Has your g a able to the County of Roanoke?~ the amount of $25.00 p Y . IF ALL QUESTIONa uAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, PIRG COMMISSIONER OF THE RE Phone: ~" p,0. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 NOTARIZATION E TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS' ~ !~ THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST B er ury as set swear or affirm under the penalties of p 7 I hereby that all of the aband forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virgi knowledge, information, statements are uestionsthaveebeenfanswered. I further swear that beliefs. All q ies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 I have read the Coderstand the attached cop de of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. se of the et. se °f Code. Roanoke County Signed by: ., , .3L3~ a'`~ Home Address ~C ~~ Z-7~~ ~ ~ // Name in the da of 19 Subscribed and sworn before me, this __ y County/City of Virginia. 19 My commission expires: - Notary Public NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED been found in due form, is approved The above application, having nd issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st o a ,.--, this calendar year. ~ ~ ~ `~ ~~ -- ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Com ~is ~ oner of ~he Revenue Date The above application is not approved.- Commissioner of the Revenue Date ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P•O• BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VA COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVIJNUE Title 24018 4 A-41294-9.b ACTION NO . ~' ITEM NUMBER A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAR COUNTY ADMINISTRATION C LATER AT VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, ril 12, 1994 MEETING DATE' AP Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit for AGENDA ITEM' Calendar Year 1994 from the Star Quilters Guil COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' 'lters Guild has requested a permit to hold raJulysll1, The Star Qul ear 1994, specifically, Roanoke County for the calenda TAY s application has been reviewed 1994, and December 5, 1994. h the Commissioner of Revenue.iedin the Clerk'ss Office It e wit lication is on fi approved. The app The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: is recommended that the application for a Raffle r vedlt for It calendar year 1994 from the Star Quilters Guild be app SUBMITTED BY: ~j I Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -- ------------------------------- VOTE -------------- ACTION No Yes Abs x Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Approved ( ) x Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix x To ( ) Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File _- RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICA 5-3 ame permit. This made for a raffl and State laws, rules, Application is hereby ect to all County or that may be enacted application is madeulations now in force, the undersigned ordinances, and reg agreed to by hereafter and which are hereby anization and which shall be applldaatconditionlunder whiche this permit is issued. deeme ulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se ° Raffle games are strictly reg inia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. the criminal statutes of theCodeg These laws authorize the r ornto se of the Roanoke County ation p Board of Sup s from the filing ervisors tot °nThetgoard hasasixty daytig granting a raffle perms the permit. The Board may deny, of an application to grant or deny ermit of any organization found not to e suspend, or revoke the p and state law. in strict compliance with county Name of Organization Lx~~~ ~ L' j: LU Mailing Address ~- ,/ City, State, Zip Code ~ ¢~- When was the organization founded? ~ ~ ~~ ~ r -t'~ f - ose and Type of organization ~ ~ ~.-~ "~ ~ Has the organization been in continuous years? YES_==-- C. Gam- L existence in Roanoke County for two NO~_ ation non-profit? YES_ i/ NO~_ Is the organiz e or anization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue I s th g Code? YES / NO If applicable) Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. r or anization understand that any organization found in Does you g Bingo and Raffle Ordinance °rthistpermit•is violation of the County inia authorizing shareholder, 340.10 et. se of the Cer~itfrevoked and any person, subject to having such p anization who violates the agent, member or employee of such org e above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? our organization understand that it must maintain and file sements pertaining to Raffle Does y audit by _ the complete records o sucheirecords dare r subject to games and that Commissioner of the Revenue? ~S VIRGINIA P O. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, ROANOKE, VA 24018 COMl~'IISSIONER OF THE REVENUE 1 0 our organization understand th et it is a violation of la ~ to rson or firm,, association, Does y contract with any P ursuan enter into a ualified organization P oration organization (other than another Qnia), partnership, or corp ur ose of organizing, § ig.2-340.13 of the Code of Virg for the p P of any classification w Raf f les r? ~~ ~ S managing, or conducting VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: ~• DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, Fair Market Value Article Description ~/ ~ ~ G ~ ~~L l'~'7 , i~ G i ~f ~ti~ ~~Ll;-~~k, lam`' -- ~~~~~~~/ ~~~y~1~ DATE OF RAFFLE ~-^~- list below all If this application is for an ANNUAL Rp,FFLE PERMIT, dates raffles will be held. il, i 9~t '~ ~ ~.~ -e-~ ~• S ecific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? ~. ~ ~ - ~~~" ~~~ ~ ermit s 11 be valid only for the abov ~o~1O~~'~~l ~~, NOTE. This p l/~- a ermit to conduct bingo games or raffles Any organization holding P ercent (12.5) of its gross receipts shall use twelve and one-half P urposes for which the rom all bingo games or raffle ion 1 P hose lawful religious, f or educat County Code charitable, community organization is specifically chartered or organized. will be how the proceeds from Raffle(s~roceeds. §4-101) State specifically fanned or intended use of the p used. List in detail the p Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~~ ~. ~L~ -~ _,. ~,> _~ G~Gr-vf c~r~-~- p~.~ c~ _/~- -- ~}/~_~y..~ ~~-~t..c~c_. ~-~.E..~ ~~»~..L c ~:"'~'~' ,~-~' mac, ~~~ ,. ~r ~~~rr-' P.O. BOX 20409 COi1NTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SSIONER OF 'I`HE ~~~~ ROAI~TOKE, VA 24018 COMMI a Officers of the organization: Phone: President: Address: Vice President: ~"-3 Phone: Address: ~~ c~-~`' ~~ ~~ Phone ~E,~- Secretary: Address: Treasure: Address: Phone: onsible for Raffle operations: Member authorized to be resp Name: Home Address Phone ~~~- .~~ ~Jr Bus Phone ` financial report required by the code Member responsible for filing if your organization ceases to exist: Name : ~l~. Home Address ~~G ~ Phone ~i~'~" ~~~'~ Bus Phone g our organization understand ershi luponlthebrequest of the Doe y furnish a complete list of its ~~~~~ Commissioner of the Revenue? ur or anization attached a check for the annual permit fee in Has yo g a able to the County of Roanoke?%~ the amount of $25.00 p Y ^ iF ALL uur,~~y COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF TIIE REVENUE 24018 P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 3 BINGO ORrRAFFLE ROCEEDS ~3 L_ his certif icate MUST be verified under oath by the Fiscal Officer, T President, and Members of the Board of Direc ors. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE FILED WITH THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT BY DECEMBER 1ST. Name of Or anization certify that the proceeds of all B t g thoses lawfulflerelig~ousa I herein have been use or t educati onal purposes for which this charitable, community chartered or organized and that the organization is specifically o eration of such Bingo Games °rrRiniaeSas amended,in accordance P with Title 18.2 of the Code of Vi g Date /a ' '~"~ S ignature r Title /~.~a,vd o~~•rec~rS Name ~^ n /Zy ~ ~ Gc.R~ T ~.i /Y K ~~oi~ P • ~. W . ~o o~..+~a Home Address Z-~-D~ VO 'na+- ~~ Date / v _' S~'~3 z. Signature Title ~{ G~O`~ Name ~,41~1 ~ ~ la ~~d~" ~ ---- /$..~ ~o ,eus ih ~'Yt'N ~ ~ ~5,~/e r~ ~. ~ Home Address ~~ /~ ~- ~.y~ey2 Date %~ T - ~ ~a Signature l ~.~'Z-'~ ~~~C 3' -~ 2 Tit 1 e 5~ C-~c: F~ Name ~~ ~ 15Z.- 6~~ ~= `; i ry1 ~ ~~- Home Address ~ ~ --~ ''fin ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Date /~ ~~~~ ~, Signature ~ Title / ~~f~^~ Name ~'/' 4 s1 ~~/ /~ ._ . in .. rl, iii Home Address ~ z The above signed Officers and Directors hereby swear or affirm under penalties of perjury as se Statement i ltruelto the besttof Code of Virginia, that the above their knowledge, information, and beliefs. da of 19 Subscribed and sworn before me, this -Virginia. in the County/City of My commission expires:19-- Notary Public 3 NOTARIZATION ~~ TH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICp-1`TTS THE FOLLOWING OA er ur as set swear or affirm under the penalties of p 7 y I hereby inia, that all of the aband forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virg• knowledge, information, statements are true to the best of mY ies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 • fs. All questions have been ached cop I further swear thhe belie _g_ of t I have read and understand tiniatand Section 4-86 et. se et. se of the Code of Virq' Roanoke County Code. Signed by: ~~ . ~--. ~, ~- / ~, ~~z.<. ~y x--~'~r-' , ~'~"~~"` ~ Title Home Address Na e ~ in the this~day ofa~'~-~19 Subscribed and sworn before me, ' Virginia. County / ~Y o f ^-Z~~~.-~-~ ~=- ~ 3'`~ ~ ~ ' 19 ~~ ,~ `; ,r „ ~/~~ My commission expires: ~~t'„ '• `~ 4 -~ `~ ~ ~rz~~c `' Public Notary NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED been found in due form, is approved The above application, having issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st o and this calendar year. ~ , ~ - --tip-. ~ '~ ~~ ~ % ~' ~ ~j ~ ' C mmiss ' oner of the Revenu Date The above application is not approved. Date ,V~G~A p,0. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF R R OO~~ ~~~ ROANOKE, VA COMIVIISSIONE Commissioner of the Revenue 24018 4 A-41294-9.c ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T OANOKER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRC NTR COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Delta Kappa Sorority of Epsilon Sigma Alpha COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: of Epsilon Sigma Alpha has requested a The Delta Kappa Sorority permit to hold a 50/50 raf been reviewedewith the Commissioner of 1994. This application has roved. The application 1s Revenue and he recommends that it be app on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Delta Kappa Sorority of Epsilon Sigma Alpha be approved. APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: ~~~~, ~ Elmer C. Hodge Mary H. Allen County Administrator Clerk to the Board ----------- -------------------- VOTE ------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix x To ( ) Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File APPLICATION ~ .~ ~ ,EPEE PERMIT RA made for a raffle game permit. This Application is hereby rules, application is made subject to all County ordthattmayabe~enacted ordinances, and regulations now in force, the undersigned hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by a plicant and officers of the hisanerm t ois issuedlch shall be P deemed a condition under which t p ames are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of Raffle g , and by Section 4-86 et. the criminal statutes of th Codeg1riThesedlaws authorize the County se of the Roanoke County rior to Board of Supervisors to conThetBoard hasasixty dayslfrom the filing granting.a raffle permit. ermit. The Board may deny, of an application to grant or deny the p ermit of any organization found not to be suspend, or revoke the p and state law. in strict compliance with county o p nYOV~ ~ ~i ~ U Name of Organization Mailing Address 3 City, State, Zip Code When was the organization founded? (~1 I I I A' n ~ ~~~ .Once Purpose and Type of Organization r Has the organization been 'n existence in Roanoke County for two ears? YES_,~ NO continuous y Is the organization non-profit? YES~_ NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES_~ NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) our organization understand that any organization found in Does y violation of 'the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance orthistpermit. is 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorie~son' shareholder, subject to having such permit revoked aad any p agent, member or employee o e Built orof na felony? ho v.olates the above referenced Codes may b g Y Does your organization understand that it musts to n ng complete records of receipts and disbursements p games aad that such nue?rds are subject to audit Commissioner of th• Reve and f ile to Raffle by the p.0. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, ~ ~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 COMMISSIONER OF THE 1 oes our organization understand thae sc 1 or firmat association, D y ursuant to enter into a contract with any P or corporation organization (other than of Virggnia)f partnershiption p ~ 1g.2-340.13 of the Code for the purpose of organizing, . of any classification whgafflesr? managing, or conducting ~. DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Description C~.S h ~~~~~~ Fair Market Value ~~ app. ~ DATE OF RAFFLE S of S t g 4 `~ location is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all If this app dates raffles will be held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? _ ~ . mit shall be valid only for the above location. NOTE. Th s p a ermit to conduct bingo games or raffles Any organization holding P ercent (12.50 of its gross receipts shall use twelve and one-half p om all bingo games or raffles. for tu= scsesawfor whiff lothe fr or educational P P Code charitable, community chartered or organized.'(County organization is specifically will be -101 State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s~roceeds. §`~ ~ Tanned or intended use of the p used. List in detail the p Use estimated amounts if necessary. + on GI~~~~t-Lns ~05~~-~-a,l - ~onct, ~ 5-}-. ~ ,.~ ~ ~. p,0. BOX 20409 CpU1VTY OF ROANOKE, 'VIItGIN~ OANOKE, VA 24018 COI~'IlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE R a ` ~ Officers of the organization: J ,, Phone : 7 ~ k - a(~ -- President: Address: 3 n '~ Phone:~~~ Vice President: 1/ Address: ~~ ~ . ~~\ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ Phone : '~ 2-~- l `-~ q'~1 Secretary: ~'~ ~+h` Address: ~3~-`~ ~°-~~~ ~''+ ~1~ ~~ Phone : 3`43 - 9 ~~' i~t~ ~ Treasurer : ~ a ~~~ no ~ ~ S~ ~/vOSS Address: Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name: ~~ ~ Home Address Phone "j'1 ~ ~ ~ ~..g~ Busphone ~7N~ K`'f financial report required by the node Member responsible for filing if your organization ceases to exist: Name: • ~ ~ fuse 5 ~ Home Address -; ~ ~ " ~~ Y~'~' Phone 3 H~ - q~ S~` Bus Phone q3-=~ cur organization understand that it will be required to Does y u on the request of tha furnish a e=mofethelRevenue?ts membership P Commissiea our or anization attached a check for the annual permit fee is Bas y g a able to the County of Roanoke? the amount of $25.00 p y .a IIESTIONS BAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. _~ ~L ! OF ROAI~IOKE, VIRGIlV~IA P.O. BOX 20409 COt~'1'I'~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 COI~IlVILSSIONER OF THE RE~`I%N 3 ..,,. ~ _ . _ - ~ - NOTARIZATION G OATH MUST~BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: ~~~ THE FOLLOWIN er ur as sst swear or affirm under the penalties of p j Y I hereby that all of the aband forth in 518.2 of the Code of Virgi knowledge, information, statements are true to the best of my estions have been answered. I further swear that beliefs. All qu I have read and understand the atanahsectione4-86 etC•se8.2of4the ~ $gqs of the Code of Virglnla Roanoke County Code. signed by: ~ ~ .. Home Address ~.~ ~ ivaiurs ___1.__day o f I~~r~r'tc~,i9~ in the subscribed and sworn before me, this ~ - ~~~ ,~~ ~t ~, , Virginia. Couat City o~ -•-~~ ~ ~ y commission expires: ~ ~~-' 19~ ~.' ~ °`~ Notary ub c NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED _ been found in due form, is approved The above application, having d issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of an this calendar year. J ~ ~ 1 ~ C_. ommiss' ner of t Revenue u~- Date The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue • p,0. BOX 20409 COI:fNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGIN~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 C014IlVRSSIONER OF TI3E RE`'I~NE 4 A-41294-9.d ACTION NO. --~-- J" ITEM NUMBER LAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFTY UAP MINI TRATION C LATER AT A REGU COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COU ril 12, 1994 MEETING DATE' AP Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the AGENDA ITEM' North Cross School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' s School has requested a permit to hold raffles in The North Cros 1994. This application has been Roanoke County on May 5 and 7 , h the Commissioner of Revenue ind t e Clerk es Office . It reviewed wit The application is on file be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: oinmended that the application for a Raffle Permit from It is rec roved. North Cross School be app SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~ Mary H. Allen the Board pppROVED BY Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Clerk to --------------------- -------- ------------------ VOTE --------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Approved (x) Motion by: _ x Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens cc: File Bingo/Raffle File .. .~ .,„k,.:,~ RAFFLE ame permit. This made for a raffl and State laws, rules, Application is hereby act to all County be enacted application is made lations now in force, or that may ordinances, and regu agreed to by the undersigned hereafter and wh icersr of tithe organization and which shall be applicant and off ermit is issued. deemed a condition under which this P ,tle 18.2-340.1 et. se of awes are strictly regulated by Tl and by Section 4-86 et. Raffle g , inia Code, the criminal statutes of the Virg ation prior to he Roanoke County Code. Th onable invest gZe the Coun y se of t Board of Supervisors to conduct a reas days from the filing a raffle permit. The Board has sixty The Board may deny, granting rant or deny the permit. of an application to g ermit of any organization found not to be suspend, or revoke the p and state law. in strict compliance with county North Cross School Name og prganization Address 4254 Colonial Ave SW Mailing City, State, Zip Code Roanoke VA 24018 P~g~YlIT APPLI phen was the organization founded? 1961 purpose and Type of organization Private School anization been i~ existence in Roanoke County for two Has the. org continuous years? YEB~_ NO------- Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO--- , t under §501{c) (3) of the Internal Revenue; Is the organization exemp Code? YES X NO co of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If aPPlicable) Attach PY anization understand that any organization found la ' Does your org t Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or sectien~it• is violation of the Coun y this p of the Code of Virginia authorie=scn, shareholder, 340.10 ets se such permit revoked and anY P s~ject to having to ee of such organization who YeSOlates the agent,-member or amp Y uilty of a felony. above referenced Codes may be g or anization understang that ~ musP maintain and fi e ants ertaininq to Raffle ~Oes :your g ~ the :complete..-,records of receipts and disburse act to audit by ames and that such rec?rds Yese sub? . 4 ; Commissioner of the Revenue ~ VIRG~A P.O. BOX 20409 COZfNTY OF ROANO ~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 COl~'IMISSIONER OF T~ ~~~ .. _.. y :.. . . ,,,.. .~ ~~$ ° ~~~*~"~'```" ti"`~'~'~~~ ~p4 violation of law to ,:~.A ..~: f_~.~w..,.~ ~ .. or f irm, association, Does your organization understand th a=sc is a contract with anY P anization pursuant to eater into a or corporation organization (other thananother qualifies tnership, anizing, § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia) , p ` for the purpose of orq of any classification w Rafflesr? Yes managing, or conducting DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, Article Description 1-Tuition Scholar.sh~.p 2-USAir tickets (2) to anywhere in the United States VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Fair Market Value $4,000 $1,200 DATE OF RAFFLE Tuition Raffle 5/5/94 & Airline Tickets P.affle 5/7/94 If this application is for an ~priUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, dates raffles will be held. list below all 8 ecific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? P 4254 Colon etm~t steal o be val d only for the above location. NOTE. This p a ermit to conduct bingo games or raffles Any organization holding p erceat (12.50 of its gross receipts- shall use twelve and one-half p s for which ~' the..., bin o games or raffles .for turscselawful religious, prom nll g or educational p p anized.~(County Code charitable, community chartered or orq eeifically roceeds from Raffle(s) will'be . organization is ecif ically how the p roceeds. §4-101) State sp fanned or intended use of the p used. List in detail the p Use estimated amounts if necessary. Scholarships and classroom supplies P.O. BOX 20409 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, V~V'~~ U ROANOKE, VA COI~IlVHSSIONER OF THE RE 24018 • Officers of the organization: Phone: President: John C. Parrott II . 3112 Somerset Street. Roanoke VA 24014 Address. Phone: Vice President• Robert N Fishburn Roa~?oke VA 24014 Address• 3542 Peakwood Drive Phone: Secretary: Lucy R. Ellett .,.,~-, T,.~ u~,av Roanoke VA 24018 Address : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~" -" " • Phone: Treasurer: Bittle Porterfield III Roanoke VA 24014 Address: 2436 Cornwallis Ave ember authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: M G Wi_l.liam Stace IV Name: Home Address 430 Willow Oak Drive Roanoke VA 24015 Phone Bus Phone (703) 989-6641 financial report required by the code Member responsible for filing if your organization ceases to exist: Name: Jo ce H. Dickenson 1844 Maiden Lane Roanoke VA 24015 Home Address Bus Phone (703) 989-6641 Phone tion understand that it will be required to -Does.your organizes u on the request of the furnish a complete list of its membership P Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes ation attached a check for the annual permit fee in gas your organiz of Roanoke? Yes the amount of $25.00 payable to the County - NS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Ir' :ALL QIIESTI• ANOKE, VIItGINIA- P•O. BOX 20409. - . CO~ OF RD - ,ROANOKE, VA 24018 COI~IlVIISSIONER OF THE REV'~:NVE ~`' ~ . T ~, ..; ~.w r~. ,. NOTARIZATION THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST~BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: ur as set swear or affirm under the penalties of perk Y I hereby inia, that all of the abated forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virg knowledge,-information, statements are true to the best of my efs. All questions have been achedreopies ofrSecr 18e2r340a1 beli I have read and understand the att se of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. se of the e .___2s Code. Roanoke County D, Palmieri Business Manager 6511 Deepwoods Dr Signed by:Mar ~ Roanoke VA 24018 ~~ ~ ~ Q,~, "-' '" Home Address Title 24 day of Marchl9 94 in the Subscribed and sworn before me, this _ = Virginia. County/City of Roanoke \,~ MY commission expires: 5/31/ 19 g6 ~ Cx`1 ~ rv Public NOT VALZD UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED been found in due form, is approved The above application, having 'ssued to the applicant~to have effect until December 31st of and i this calendar year. ~~ ~' 2 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Co ssioner of he Revenue Date The above application is not approved. Commissioner of the Revenue Date b~ s , F ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P•O• BOX 20409 ~COUNTY-~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 COl~'IlVIISSIONER OF THE RE'V`1%NUE a ~~ internal Revenue Service District Director D Tjprt$ C,roS$ School 4254 Qolonia~ Avenue lmartoke, VA 24018 Department of the Treasury Person to Contact: " Taxpayer Service Te~pOhlo~ a Number: .i 962-2590 Reter Reply to: Da~~ July 18, 1984 Dear TaxPayer~ status of The following information regarding the eX~t yon on?anization 6- 1-84 is furnished in response to your letter dated -- We have searched our files and can find no reccre tha' the organization is exempt f~rosr, Federal lncfoi tai-exemp~hst~tus; event the organization ~dsinformaaPon}are attached. the appropriate forms an A search of our files indicates that the o:garizatior: is a t-,rivate X 501 (c) 3 and other t~ian exem t from Federal Income 'tax under~neatP~~~ o tion escr~ed ~ Sections • _ ~__.,..,.:~ ;,, ~PCtion(s) 11 and other _ 1 A ii) effective F~''~'• 1964 ~ A fact sheet containing basic information about the organiza- tion's tax-exempt status is enclosed. r~ A copy of our letter certifying the status of the organiza=ion is enclosed. X A copy of. our letter certifying the status of the organization is not available, however, this letter may be used to verify .your tax-exempt status. ~ e of address has been noted in our files. Our [', Your Chang our address as: records .now indicate y Sincerely yours, ~~ ~,y wM- ~.,~• ,..+r• A-41294-9.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER V AT A REGULAR MEE DI AT THE TROANOKE COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit f Clubthe Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag ) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIl~lARY OF INFORMATION The Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag Club) has requested a permit to hold 50/50 raffles in Roanoke County on June 4 and 5, 1994. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Perm rovedm the Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag Club) be app SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. lien Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --- ---------------- - --------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. John on No Yes Abs Approved (x) Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke .~. Referred ( ) Minnix ~_ To ( ) Nickens ~_ cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~'- ~® ................ .. T APPLICATION RAFFLE PERMI ame permit. This Application is hereby made for a raffle g rules, application is made subject to all County ordthattmayabe+enacted ordinances, and regulations now inafreed~ to by the undersigned hereafter and which are hereby g applicant and officers of the this a erm t ois issuedlch shall be deemed a condition under which P re ulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et • se of Raffle games are strictly g Section 4-86 e~ the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by ~eQ• of the Roanoke County ductea reasonable investigation priornto Board of Supervisors to con granting a raffle permit . The Board has sixty dThe Boarrd may denyg of an application to grant or deny the permit. the ermit of any organization found not to be suspend, or revoke P and state law. in strict compliance with county ~, ,: Name of Organization ~ w l Mailing Address -_~~, State, Z ip Code ""1 ~ ( a ' ""' City, When was the organization founded? ~ 7 ~ ~- ~, -:. purpose and Type of Organization ~; ~~~ ~ t~1 ~~ been in existence in Roanoke County for two Has the organization continuous years? YES__,~,__ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YE3 NO_~ of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Attach copy our organization understand that any organization found in Does y violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Sectieon~i~• is 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorierscnthsha=eholder, subject to having such permit revoked and any p agent, member or employee be suilty rof na felony? ho ~ lates the above referenced Codas mzy S Does your organization undo an a bursa entsspertain ng to Raffle complete records~of receipts the games and that such records are S~subject to audit by Commissioner of th• Revenue? COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O• BOX 20409 CO1~~VIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 l ization understand that it is a violation of law to ~-IO Does your organ arson or firm, association, ' enter into a contract with anY P organization (other than another qualifi a tnershipt or corporation § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), P ur ose of organizing, . of any classification whRaf f les r; for, ~~, P P managing, or conducting E DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: 1'"a11 raaa..~~ - -- Article Description ~ ~~1~ L~ '~ ~-~/mod O~ ~ /,~~/I~' '~~~~5 DATE OF RAFFLE ~.~T~tic' ~~ ` If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. ~i ~ ~ is to be conducted? specific location where Raffle drawing ~s ~~ . arm t shall be valid o y fo the above location. NOTE. Th s p a ermit to conduct bingo games or raffles Any organization holding p shall use twelve and one-half affles tfor2 those lawful sreligiousa from all bingo games or r ur oses for which. the charitable, community or educational p P organization is specifically chartered or organized.•(County Code: 4-101 State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be S ) lanned or intended use of the proceeds. used. List in detail the p Use estimated amounts if necessary. v~~y , /` / ~ l \ // ' / ~ ~~ ~~ COZ:fNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGIl~TIA P•O• BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF TIE REVI~NUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a T " (17 Officers of the Organization: ~ .• President: Address: ~~'G''~~~ I ~~ Vice President: Address: _/~ f~ ~"~P I~~ Phone: J`,,~ ~ ~ Phone Secretary : v ~~'~~ '~~ `'' Address: ~? ~~ ~~" ,'/ ~/~~~ ~~ Phone : 3~ 7-/,~~~~ Treasurer : ~> l i /, . (!~ ~ ~ l ~ ~l-~~~t~ 1 _._ Address: "- Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name : ~C~~1~7 2 ~ ~~ K- ~~ ns~ ~~ Home Address ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' Phone ~,~~ - ~ ~_ Bus Phone financial report required by the code Member responsible for filing if your organization ceases to exist: ~~ ' Name : ~ ~ ~~ Home Address i `' % ~ ~ ~~~ .a ~ u ` ~`~~ Phone ~ T ~ ~~ ~ Bus Phone Does your organization and is tmembership uponl thebreque t of the furnish a complete list of i Commissioner of the Revenue? Has your organization attache to thecCounty of Roanoke ermitS ee in the amount of $25.00 payable -~ Ig AI,L QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. OUNrY OF ROANOKE, VIRGIl~TIA P•O• BOX 20409 C ROAI~TOKE, VA 24018 COMLVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE 3 NOTARIZATION -T- ~° THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Cod best of my knowledge,ainformationaband statements are true to the beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear tha I have read and understandrtiniatandhSectione4-86 etC.se8.2of4the et. se of the Code of Vi q Roanoke County Code. signs by: _ ~~~ ~ Title Home Address Name `~j~ ~~ this day of~~/Qtil./~19 in the Subscribed and sworn before me, ~ ~~~_! , Virginia. County/~i of ~i- 3 19~ A ~,,~~~~/ My commission expires: Notary Public NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED lication, having been found in due form, is approved The above app and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st o this calendar year. ~, ~ '~ ~ C L /lCommi Toner of the Revenue Date The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVUNUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 A-41294-9.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETIAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY UADMINI TRATIONRC LATER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Catawba Valley Ruritan Club COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION The Catawba Valley Ruritan Club has requested a pe~licationlhas raffle in Roanoke County on May 28, 1994. This app been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the applicatroved r a Raffle Permit from the Catawba Valley Ruritan Club be app SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. lien Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator --------------------- --------------------- ACTION VOTE Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix x To ( ) Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File •c.J ' E PERMIT APPLICATION RA.FFL Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of Organization Mailing Address City, state, Zip Code L When was the organization founded? / ~ 7 Purpose and Type of Organization f t 1/i C' Has the organization been iYyexistence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES (/ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES___ / NO Is the organiza ion exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your violation 340.10 et. subject t agent, me above ref organization understand that any organization found in of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- sect. of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is o having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, tuber or employee of such organization who violates the erenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? s~- Does your organization understand that it must mai tain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? COUNTY OF ROANOKE, 'VIRGINIA ROANOKE oVA 24018 COMMISSIONER OF TIIE REVENYJE 1 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to ~ '7 enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Raffles ? DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Description Fair Market Value ,5'D O ~-~v ,o ~ cL~ DATE OF RAFFLE ~~ If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? w NO his pe mit shall be valid only for the above location. Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) SSttensdetail the plannedeorrintendedruseRoffthesproceedse used. Li Use estimated amounts if necessary. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a ~~ Officers of the Organization: President: Address: (r (~ / J S~ ~~'- ~'`"d'~ Vice President : ~ ~lc '1" G h ~ ~ l ~1 ~ ~---- Address: Phone : ~~L ~ ~~ :s Phone: ~ d ~ (~o~b~] Ste- I~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~s~ Secretary : ~~~ ~(~~ ~~~ 00 ('7 `~' Phone : ~ ~' L~ ~J ~~J ~l Address: Treasurer : ~! ~~f Phone : ,~ Zl ~ S~ Address: ~ /`Aw ~ ~ ~_`~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name: n ~ Home Address ®" '.~ 1 Phones i~ Bus Phone Member responsible for f ilinq financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: t ~/ Name : ~ Y~ Home Address Phone Bus Phone Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~~_ Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? IF ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINI,~-1 P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 NOTARIZATION S 7 THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. se of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. signed by: Name ~ C_ ess Titl i~ Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of 19 in the County/City of Virginia. My commission expires: Notary Public NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED 19 The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this cale~njdar year. " ~ ~I '" Date T- ommiss ones of he Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 A-41294-9.g ITEM NUMBER ~~ ACTION NO. p, REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAR COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AT COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE• April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Acknowledgement of Arabian Lane into Virginia Department Acceptance °f System lbys the the Secondary of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SPRY OF INFORMATION' road has received acknowledgement thtem the f the Virginia Roanoke County has been acc T~ nsportation effect a March 30, 1994 Department of Equestrian Hills 0.19 Miles of Arabian Lane (Route 1245) ppPROVED BY SUBMITTED BY : J/~- ~ 1~~ ~~ ~~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge Mary H. Allen County Administrator Clerk to the Board -------------- ----------------------- VOTE ----------- ACTION No Yes Abs Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Approved (x) x Denied ( ) Kohinke Johnson x Received ( ) x Referred ( ) Minnix To ( ) Nickens x cc: File Engineering & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, ~- ~~ da yew®,p /%~ -' e ,~~~ o , ~~~a cC®~Nl[®~T~]E~]L~']H[ of V~]R~~I®T~A RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMO N AD BROAD STR~RTATION RICHMOND, 23219 March 30, 1994 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke p,0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: the following our resolution dated February 8, 1994, As requested in y roved, effective addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby app March 30, 1994. LENGTH ADD_ ITI~N EQUESTRIAN HILLS _ From Route 1246 to 0.19 mile North- 0.19 Mi Route 1245 (Arabian Lane) east Route 1246 Sincerely, }~ 1~.~~ Ray D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ..t~ .U~. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON APRIL 12, 1994 RESOLOTION 41293-9.h SIIPPORTING IINIFIED HIIMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC. (RADAR) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 18 MONIES WHEREAS, Roanoke County, Virginia wishes to support public transportation; and WHEREAS, the accessibility to jobs, shopping, medical care and human services is difficult and sometimes not possible for people in the rural areas of the County; and WHEREAS, public surveys have shown a priority need for dependable and reliable transportation in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Unified Human Services Transportation Systems, Inc. has been in operation for more than eighteen years providing public transportation services as a sound and responsible organization. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. has the support and authorization to execute and file an application to the Department of Rail and Transportation of the Commonwealth of Virginia for a grant of financial assistance. Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. has certified that the funds received shall be used in accordance with the requirements of Section 58.1 - 2425 of the Code of Virginia. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a true and correct copy of the resolution adopted at a legally convened meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors held on the 12th day of April, 1994. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /F • ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 41294-9.h adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, April 12, 1994. 6/ Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OUNTY UADMINISTRAT ONROENTER A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOK ril 12, 1994 MEETING DATE• AP orting Re uest for Approval of a Resolution SUPP Inc. AGENDA ITEM• q stem, Unified Human ServiclicationpforaSection 18 Monies ~Rppp,R) in Their App ortation Services to Provide Fixed Schedule Transp in the Rural Area of Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND • ~Dp,R) has Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc . ~ of n working with County staff to determine the feasibility bee ortation service to the provided a limited fixed schedul We have met with officials from western part of Roanoke County. ortation and they the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transp re ared the dvised that some Section 18 monies arse D via has lp Pich must have a be used for rural transportation are has been scheduled ant a plication in the amount of ublic0 hearing was required to e gr P 1994, and a p ublic submitted by April 1, ril 18 for p at the Roanoke County Administration Center on A art of the County input . This money must be used f or thee~ d f rp the first effort . and the area West of Salem has Wee Cann ev aluate other areas of the Once the program is in place, County to be supplemented by this type of service. RADAR has agreed to The grant is generally a 50/50 match. ro ram and a utilize monies previously earmarked for the CORTRAN p g rove the ssible contribution from RADAR to f eserv Ce hshould mmp h if t e po grant is approved. This type o of the CORTRAN program and allow our dollars to e efficiency for the provision of transportation services. invested more wisely Valley Metro is the recipient o of el g ble to receive monaes the state program, therefore we areour g If approved, rant would be for a twe ve under that category• October 1, 1994. month period beginning FISCAL IMPACT• using CORTRAN • 50 match, however by The grant requires a 50/ uired at this time. monies, no new County dollars are req •c. -~ ALTERNATIVES' orting the efforts of 1, Approve the attached resolution supp on behalf of Roanoke RADAR in obtaining Section 18 funding County. 2, Do not approve the resolution and ask that the State not consider the grant application, RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends Alternative No. 1a alCasslstingbeRADAR thn approval of the attac ro ide transportation services to part of obtaining the grant to p the rural section of Roanoke County. Approv d by,, Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ ~`'~ - 'fir ~'~ ~~"'~`~ Elmer C . Hodge John M. Chambl~ s, Jr. Administrator-__-____ County Assistant Administrator _ ________ ----------- ----------------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy d ( ) Johnson Dente Received ( ) Kohinke Referred ( ) Minnix To ( ) Nickens <-' ~' I ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TH ANOKERDCOUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT `rA R R~ 12 , 1994 WHEREAS Roanoke County, Virginia wishes to support public transportation, and WHEREAS the accessibility to jobs, shopping, medical care and human services is difficult and sometimes not possible for people and in the rural areas of the County, ublic surveys have shown a priority need for WHEREAS p and dependable and reliable transportation in Roanoke County, Inc. WHEREAS Unified Human Services Transpore rs provid ng public has been in operation for more than eighteen y transportation services as a sound and responsible organization, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED Serv ces Transportati on1Systemf Roanoke County that Unified Human Inc. has the support and authorization to execute and file an application to the Department of R a t f finanpoiala assistaYicee Commonwealth of Virginia for a g stem, Inc. has certified Unified Human Services Transportation Sy that the funds received sha112425 ofethe CodecofdVirginia h the requirements of Section 58.1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that 1h convened meeting ofrthe Roanoke the resolution adopted at a legal y of April, 1994. County Board of Supervisors held on the 12th day A-41294-9.i ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1994 from the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 has requested a permit to hold 50/50 raffles in Roanoke County weekly during the calendar year 1994. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit for calendar year 1994 from the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: /~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board [:/ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File PERMIT APPLICATION ~'-' RAFFLE ~~ z ~ ~ Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. T is application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting. a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The•Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of Organization Vin~#o~, ~~~=•O~~" ~°+"~~~' ~Ilal Mailing Address PD ~~ ~`~ '`~ "' City, State, Zip Code ~+r ~ ~~ `~ }~~ ~~ When was the organization founded? l9 (- Purpose and Type of Organization /~tt "~t" "rf i~r Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES / NO Is the organization non-profit? YES / NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES / NO Attach copy of IR3 Tax Exensptio~x Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. sea• of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Yes Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~/es COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to ~-~~ enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to ~ 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, ` managing, or conducting Raffles ? SIPS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF 8UCH ARTICLES: Article Description Fair Market Value DATE OF RAFFLE ~-~QK~~~~f If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will, bey held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? ~la'1 ~aShcr,a ~~<; ~~~ ~;t,a_c_, NOTE: This permit shall be valid only for the above location. Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.50 of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.Q. BOX 20409 COI~IlVIISSIONER OF 1'~IE REVI~NUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a Officers of the Organization: ' ~Uov¢rr,u/ P-~esi.dent • ~_r.~ r~ ~~ i~u ~~ ~ ~~.? Phone Address • ~~~ ~ V~ ~~~ ~ ~ - ~~ H ~''-i 1 r1~ 41 r. U'JVr;~IU/ tf • T ~ ~.r. i. . Address: Ad m . ~ ~St vc~t~r{ Address: ~- ~ v Phone: K~~04'~ r Ili ;:~i'i 1 (~',<t f"1 Phone: V~i~,-ro,>, Vii <!~'~~ l~ `~ J t~'1 Treasurer: nobax+ ~,i~rtt.,~;,-- Phone• i Address: (~Cv ~; (~ ,,, h> - ~~/ ~ ,; +` Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name : ~ r ~ -«- ~ ~t c ,, ~ ~; . Home Address ~ ~~`~ ti-(Q(15~~~ ~~~~~~ Phone ~ "a'' ~' ' / __ Bus Phone Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: r, y Name: /Cw~~~Yi l~•:~,~f ~-~~~, ,; Home Address ~~5~/ ~F (~`'~t, ~~'~~ r~ Vir~-;cr, Phone ~'~ ~' ~ ~ ' ~ Bus Phone ~ =., ti. 1 ~; -, µ4 Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? yc~ Bas your organization attached a check for the annual per it fee in the amount of $25.OO~payable to the County of Roanoke? ~~s, IF ALL QOESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CO1~~.VIISSIONER OF TI-IE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 VI r~i~'Sn X90 /~~:.~ 3 NOTARIZATION THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: .~ i o I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. se of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. Signed by: ~/ t~ p r-t r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~2.: ,~ 7$'~ MG Lil~l`n N me Title Home Address( ,/ Subscribed and sworn before me, thisd ~~ day of ~~- 19 ~1` in the -~ U- County/°ei-t~y---af~~~~iu'-~-~-~' Virginia. ~, ~~ \ My commission expires: .~ ~ ~ 19~ otary Public NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Da Commissioner of t e Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIIZGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 ~ `~ ~ /9,,•y ~~ !~ G~ ~~.. e ~,~ ~ ~ l 4 r rorLL.ryi...yr...•wpRvnyn v. . . ~~ Y ~:,. ,~.,. .. ... ... a. ,.. c....NK^a ;~,y~. n v .. e. , 1• 't ~ ~~ 1wr~~:~t~a~~ ~Yt~~ .. ~~ `'"" COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE January 28,'1994 Robert~Testerman Vinton. Moose Lodge ,1121 !:R. ~ ~0: ' ~~Box 14 2 ;:Vinton, VA 24179 ^ R. WAYNE COMPTON .. Dear Mr. Testerman, Thank you for submitting the annual 50/50 financial report for the •x1993 reporting year, however, the report is incomplete as filed. There are no amounts entered on the "Other Supplies" line or on the ~~ ~ ~~ ~line~• for ~ "Jackpot Prizes ,Awarded" . The "Use Of Proceeds" line should reflect only those amounts used for the lawful, religious, charitable, community or educational purposes f.or which the lodge is chartered. The detail for line 21 must be specific as to how ~~ ~ the' proceeds were used. Also, I question whether the gross receipts reported reflect the actual gross or only the 50$ remaining after the winners were given their portion. :~. lease amend your return to correctly report supplies, prize money awarded, actual use of proceeds and gross receipts if necessary. In order to complete the audit of this financial report, we request that you submit the following documentation with your amended report: 1) List of the raffle winners and amount received by each ,., winner. ,~,d~ 2,=;Receipts or documentation to support supplies purchased and 14: 4 the use of proceeds. ~~ank ou for your cooperation in completing this audit. Correct Y reporting is necessary if you wish to obtain a 1994 permit. h~~ . sincerely, ~ Second ~la~ice a ~ ~. Tammie "c. Bowaei Z- 9_ 9~( Auditor G~O~' ~,:;tr. ~, x~ .. ~ r~cy~H}z ~ ~« :~~ , P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24019-OS13 (703) 772-2046 ®vnm.a on n.oyci.e aw« .. ; .: Y }~. { i,: q. P. Ord ,t ~.. p w `.. t, ; ~:~~ ~- ~~ Lo~u~ o~vE,~ x o~MOOSE VINTON LODGE No. 1121 P.O. BOX 142 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 ~14r+~'Ks !~~ ~ ~-« ~ .. i `~ ~' s I' ~-` I'~H V li f I L Uhf 2 J-1It~7r' '?/~~ d ~L ~,, Lv1` LL ~'' _ ^ ~` ~ ~~ ~ ~ -~ r ~/~vo/L~ - Ls ~ ~ err l R u ~/ ~~ . 6 u . >~ G ~ ~ ~ J 1 ~ ~~ tp d _ )_ ~ ~~ ~~ n M,~rf ~~~7v 6z AD ~ h7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N • C '- ~ .-+ W t6 ~ ~ .-~ E L Q N 3x Ql ~ ~ ~ ~ r a~ .-+ c .~ F- U O ~ +~ N ~ N p1 O !n C m o•~+a O ~ 7 N F N ~ E c6 ~ Z ttS i C 3 C v i Z} O O •• a Q ,~ r ,~ c cn O C N ~ +~ N ~ _> N > Q O M O ~ to N v O ~, , (6 O N M a~ ~- ? ~ ~ ~` M f: -- a V ~ 0 ~ r^' J_ \ J ~ ~ 1~ -- (~~ V l~ .~ F ~ ~ • .-~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ E L O O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ,~ U1 a •-1 U ~ n r7-+ C ~ 1- ~ -~ ~ - ~ U N ~ I- ~+ N 01N O ~ ~ L ~ ~ C m ~ p. ~ O UI Ql II p •,~ Q E Ul ~ ., i- ~ \ N O Ul ~ Q ~6 [n ~ (n C 3 C ~ , .. --- ------ -- - -- r ~ i C N C ~ o > N ~ Q ~ M O r v ffl a 0 t _-- `o a J 'w O g H -- a E Y r A E .t.. e r r n Ar 3 A i O 9 Y w N A 0 a E c u1 v 0 z r- ---- Z 0 Z_ O ~- io A-41294-9.j ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~' ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING THE ROANOKE OUNTY ADMIN STRA O ON CENOTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Funding for Computers from Virginia Compensation Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~,,,,~ ~, ,c~c~ BACKGROUND: The Sheriff's Office prepares and sends variouulations and monthly reports to the Compensation Board on inmate pop for state reimbursement to dat and t s fundi ng the computersato be now computerizing all this utilized in each She urfofficelfor thespurchase of two personal allocated $2, 285 to 0 computers that will enabl of our trecords personnel fa om compedeng eliminating the necessi y and remitting vouchers for monthly reimbursements to the Genera Fund. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: d the Sheriff'dsu Office w 1 benaequared the Compensation Board, a to purchase this equipment. I request that the Board of Supervisors accept these funds and designate them to the Care and Confinement of Prisoners Account. FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: None optional at this time STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of request. Approved by, Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ ~~ Gerald S. Holt Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Sheriff County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- VOTE Approved (~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ~ ) cc: File Gerald S. Diane D. ACTION Motion by: Rnh T 7nh~n,: - Holt, Sheriff Hyatt, Director, Finance No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x 7= a ~ ._ , ~~~~L~ ~~~;~ ~:. I ~ `` ~ P 10 l~`J-~ JAMES W. DYKE, JR. ~~~~~~~~~~~ OFFICE p~ ~~5 .\ i n~rr'~''~Y EX C T V€~${C~ACilI~ C h1A1RMAN CpUNTY g~~~~. ~,J^G Y MATTHEWS W. H. FORST ASSISTA NT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY W. J. KUCHARSKI ~®~~®~~~~~~~ ®~ ~~(~~1f~,T~~ EX-0FFICIO MEME3ERS JJ~~ 1L jj``~~ COMPENSATION BOARD P. O. BOX 710 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23206-0710 January 5, 1994 The Honorable Gerald S. Holt Sheriff County of Roanoke p. O. Box 510 Salem, VA 24153-0510 Dear Sheriff Holt: This is inform you of in response to your request for office automation equipment, and to Compensation Board action taken on your request. Requests totaling $864,847 were received from Sheriffs; the Compensation Board had $45d0,2B0 and deferredTactionronarequestsasubmitted under prior ties 3 and 4runtil 1, 2 an , February 1994. Specifically, the Compensation Board took the following action on your request: Requested Approved Priority 285.00 $2 2 285.00 $ r 1; , 2B: $ -0- $ -0- All approvals are for the equipment requested; the Compensation Board will not approve transfers from the equipment line item of your budget. Further, all reimbursement requests must be submitted prior to June 1, 1994 as these funds will not be available in the next fiscal year. Please call Bruce W. Haynes, James W. Matthews, or Pat McCoy if you have any questions. Sincerely, James W. Dyke, Jr., Chairman Bruce W. Hayne Executive Secretary Copy to: Governing Body James W. Matthews, Assistant Executive Secretary Pat B. McCoy, Fiscal Technician Senior/Sheriffs Program c:\wpdocs\shfegt.mrg kmt\January 4, 1994 M-I COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Audited) Original 1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve August 24, 1993 VDOT Revenue Sharing Match October 26, 1993 Purchase of ladder truck January 3, 1994 IDA -acquire 15 acres from Friendship Manor January 11, 1994 IDA donation -balance of land acquisition from Friendship Manor and water line installation January 11, 1994 January 25, 1994 January 25, 1994 IDA donation -Jack Smith Park land acquisition Purchase of 2 Knuckle Booms General Services Supplemental Allocation Balance at April 12, 1994 Amount $6,936,009 80,668 (25,000) (203,733) (272,500) (190,000) (99,189) (132,600) 400 000 $5 693.655 Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt /V/ Director of Finance of General Fund Expenditures 7.4% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447). M - ~.. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Audited) $136,635 July 13, 1993 Northside High School Ball Fields (62,000) January 25, 1994 Environmental Assessment Work - Pinkard Court 2 600 Balance as of April 12, 1994 $ 72.035 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M -,3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Original 1993-1994 Budget $100,000 July 13, 1993 Clerk of Circuit Court New Position (26,400) October 26, 1993 Codification of County Code (6,500) February 22, 1994 Fire and Rescue vehicle repalcement study 1( 2,500 Balance as of April 12, 1994 $ 54,600 Submitted by ~~J~.~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance I Q~ ~O n PROCLAMATION DECLAR~Nj/GjCTIMS' R GH7 S WEEK 24 - 30, 1994 AS IW4TIONAL CRIM WHEREAS, public opinion polls clearly indicate that crime and violence is a major concern among United States citizens; and WHERFJIS, thirty-five million Americans fall victim to violent crime each year in the United States; and WHEREAS, victims play an indispensable role in bringing offenders to justice and thus preventing further violence; and WHEREAS, law abiding citizens are no less deserving of rights, resources, restoration, and rehabilitation than the violent offenders who victimize them; and WHEREAS, victim service providers, counselors, and advocates should enjoy full support from all public and private institutions, entities and individuals in their efforts to render critical assistance to victims; and dread or WHEREAS, whether measured in dollars, domestic tranquility, death, crime represents a major threat to Americans and America; and WHEREAS, MADD Smith Mountain Lake Region is joining forces with victim service programs, criminal justice officials and concerned citizens throughout Virginia and America to observe National Crime Victim hairmatn ofethe Board of NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Lee B. Eddy, C Vir inia, do hereby declare the week of April 24 Supervisors of Roanoke County, 9 through Apri130, 1994, as NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEED and FURTHER that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors affirms its commitment to address victims' rights and criminal justice issues dun~ke Reg on. that this official proclamation be presented to MADD Smith Mountain i ~~i~:./~/"v Lee B. Eddy, Chairman f/ ATTEST: y3-~ a,~~ C1-~.~.~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk ~~ I Q Q C j ~ o ~ ~ PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 24 - 30, 1994 AS EMPLOY THE OLDER WORiG:R WEEK WHEREAS, more than 44,000 active Valley residents 55 and older contribute to the Valley's economy; and WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that hiring older workers makes good economic sense as employers increasingly recognize their older workers for their experience, reliability, judgment, and loyalty; and WHEREAS, Virginia's employment continues to shift to the service sector and away from the goods-producing sector and employers are seeking ways to retain, retrain, and recruit older workers in order to meet their employment needs; and WHEREAS, older workers, who are educated, experienced, skilled, and available, are important to the survival of Roanoke Valley business in competitive markets. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of April 24 through 30, 1994 as EMPLOY THE OLDER WORKER WEEK and call its significant to the attention of all our citizens. ~~_ ~~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman ATTEST: 7~~'l,Qif.~~^ ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER M AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER t~EZ`ING DATE: April 12, 1994. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1994. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S OONA'IE[~1TS SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CENTRAL FIDELITY 997,238.89 FERGUSON-ANDREWS 997,352.50 SIGNET 997,277.78 WHEAT 1ST 997,277.78 3,989,146.95 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: CENTRAL FIDELI'T'Y 1,018,755.96 NATIONS 1,000,000.00 SIGNET 1,019,620.71 SOUTHGVEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & IRAN 100,000.00 3,138,376.67 CONY~IERICAL PAPER: CRAIGIE NATIONS SCOTT & STRINGFELIAW SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON WHEAT 1ST LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND RESOURCE AUTElORITY REPURCHASE AGREEMII~]T FIRST VIRGINIA SAVINGS: NATIONS DOMINION TOTAL STAFF RECONH~9IIQDATION Respectfully S mitted by T Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION Motion by: 997,083.33 1,984,329.78 997,091.67 997,059.72 997,091.67 5,972,656.17 2,510,008.04 8,588,557.64 11,098,565.68 4,847,000.00 4,847,000.00 3,200.27 5,3.58.64 8,558.91 29,054,384.38 Appro,~yed by: ,~7 --<<~-- - -- `~A-1----------- Elmer C. Hodge County P~lnunistrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohnike _ _ Minnix _ i_ _ Nickens ACTION NO. /~/~ ITEM NUMBER ,"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Storm Debris Removal COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ERECUTIVE SUMMARY: The County Staff is in the process of collectcollected by County storm damage during March 1994. Brush is being crews and two contractors. To date this operation has cost just over $98,380• A total of 1,788 tons of brus~e collected from tFebruary g12Athrough 1994. Of these tons, 872 we roximately 916 tons were March 29 and taken to the landfill. APP collected from March 30 througalApark.4 and taken to the disposal site in the Southwest Industri BACKGROUND: the winter of 1993/94, approximately 3 major storms have During adversely impacted the operations of the Solid Waste Division. T e f first storm to effect co therel was no rrefuse coll ction that .weeks to the road conditions, the following week The volume to be collected was extremely heavy causing some overtime. dama a ofromaJthist stormc centeredF onruthe 10th and 11th. The g Wednesday and Thursday a °lastt two rfulls we ks s of theh month eran normally collected th in the extremely heavy, resulting in both overtime and a delay scheduled pickup of brush. The ice storm of March 2nd and 3rd seemed to hit hardest in The Monday and Tuesday route areas (South and Southwest County). volume of brush to be collected from the first storm meant that /~1- ~o Monday's and Tuesday's brush collection would already be aringeto The week following the second ice storm, staff was prep move into Monday's collectibut on a delayed basisbruThecvolumelof areas has been maintained, hi h and has brush to be collected 1For example at one household,gfour to six caused a further delay. a roximately 20,000 - 30,000 pounds knuckleboom loads weighing pp were collected. At the current time staff is collection schedule. All bulk appliances etc, will be picked up week. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: maintaining the regular bulk items, to include furniture, during the normally scheduled Crews have worked every Friday and Saturday (60 hours per week) from February 26 to April 8. Total cost to date is approximately $43,200. This cost also includes weekly overtime incurred. This work schedule is likely to roximate through April and May and result in a total app overtime cost of $97,000 over that total period of time. - The Utility Department and~ahe ersonneld to rhaul nbrush twhen provided dump trucks P possible. - The continuous six day work week is taking its toll. Employee absences and injuries are increasing. Every effort is being made to insure that weekly trash service is not interrupted. Regular trash and bulk collection remain on schedule at this time. - Approximately 872 tons of brush have been collected and disposed of in the landfill from the original ice storm at a cost of $21,800. Some small amounts of brush have been collected during normal weekly refuse collection and monthly bulk collection and is not reflected in the brush figures. Two contractors have been utilized to assist in the collection of storm debris. TreeCutters Inc., contracted sinc rox mately has cost approximately $9,380 and has serviced app 128 homes. (Tonnages unavailable; utilize own disposal site). Robbins Contractors began work March 30, 1994. Approximate cost through April 1, 1994 is $24,000. The cost includes a tub grinder with attached loader located on the leased site. He also has two dumS alonkswithn ourl t ucks all ldeliver the street. His truck g brush to the tub grinder. 2 /'~- Effective March 30, 1994, all brush collected will be taken to a site in the Southwest Industrial Park which has been leased. The cost of this site is $1,000 per month. The site will be required a minimum of six moinhs'feehebutewill halsolgreatly not only eliminate the tipp g decrease the turn around time required. - To date (April 4, 1994) approximately 475 loads of brush have been taken to this site. These loads consist of knuckleboom, rearloader and dump truck loads. roximately 916 average payload for each of these vehicles, app tons of brush have been hauled to this site. The Regional Landfill will accept pickup truck loads or less of brush from any citizen with a Roanoke County decal on the windshield. The fee for these loa Thise program bwill tallow will be charged to the County. residents wishing to dispose of their ownThrouhhtAprils4, 17 our cost (saving our collection costs). g residents hauling approximately 7 tons of material have used this opportunity. The purchase of a tub grinder has been considered. - Consider the purchase of the Southwest Industrial Park property for use during efforts such as this one and/or leaf collection. This is the third time the County has leased this property since Hugo in 1989. FEMA has estimated thaf ttheftotal tolbeccollectedf what is on the street, but only 1/3 0 COST OF COLLECTION TO DATE: Approximate Overtime Tipping Fee Tree Cutter (Chipper) Robbins Tub Grinder & trucks $ 4 3, 2 0 0 (2/26-4/8) mainly weekend work 21,800 9,380 24.000 TOTAL COST 98,380 3 M-~ STAFF INITIATIVE TO INCREASE COLLECTION CAPABILITY To increase the collection capacity, the staff is leasin both additional five knucklebooms and at least ten dump trucks, with operators. In conjunction with our knucklebs x~dahssa weeks will work continuously on brush 10 hours a day, Y Our six rearloaders and crews will assist in brusmentlwilllbe in both Fridays and Saturdays. The additional equip place by Monday, April 11, 1994. The daily cost of this operation is as follows. 5 Knucklebooms w/operators (@ $40/hour)- 10 Dump Trucks w/op 1 Tubgrinder w/operator (@ $275/hour)= 1 Bobcat Loader w/ operator (@ $45/hour)= 6 Temporary Crew on each Booms (@ $6.57 hour= Site Rental ($1000/month/31 days= Total Contracted Daily Cost 1 R.C. Knuckleboom operator (@ $10.22/hour) 1 Ro. Co. Boom Crew (@ $8.16/hour) Average Mon-ThuCouatyrDaily Cost Average Regular Employee OT Costs (per day on Friday and Saturday) Average Friday and Sate=dDa CCottacted and County p Y (Costs based upon a 10 hour day) $3,750 4,000 2,750 450 394 32 per day $11,376 $ 102 82 $11, 560 3,600 $15,160 4 /'~ _~ STAFF SUMMARY: As shown above, the initiatives will cost approximately $11,560 per day, Monday through Thursday. Friday and Saturday, the initiatives will cost approximately $15,160 per day. The additional equipment combined with the new to ed to collect the brushlon theust eetatlyy decrease the time requir May 2, brush collection should be back on the normal schedule. SIIBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gardner W. Smith, Director Department of General Services yy1..a-- Elme C. Hodge County Administrator ----- ----------------------------------- - VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Eddy Johnson Rohinke Minnie Nickens 5 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Worksession to Discuss Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Planning Commission has completed its review of a series of proposed amendments to the text of the 1992 zoning ordinance. A public hearing was held on these amendments on April 5, 1994. A Board of Supervisors public hearing is scheduled for April 26, 1994. This worksession will be an opportunity for the staff to discuss the origin and background of each recommendation and to present the Commission's recommendations to the Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That a worksession on the proposed zoning ordinance text changes be held on April 12, 1994. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. Harringto AICP Director of Planning nd Zoning Approved, r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator / Y ~' Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Action Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens N- / LISTING OF AMENDMENTS BEING CONSIDERED TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN 1994 The following information has been prepared for the Board of Supervisors work session scheduled for April 12, 1994 at 3 pm in the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room located in the New Roanoke County Administration Center at 5204 Bernard Drive. This listing contains the amendments recommended by the Planning Commission following their Public Hearing on April 5. For additional information, contact the Department of Planning and Zoning at (703) 342-2068. April 6, 1994 ~!' LISTING OF ISSUES 1. References to former agencies under the Department of Environmental Quality 1 2. Enforcement of Private Covenants 4 3. Special Use Permit Application Requirements 4 4. Inadequate Frontage -Lots of Record 5 5. Irregular Lots 6 6. Family Day Care Home 6 7. Summer Camps ~ 8. Special Use Permits for Religious Assembly 9 9. Reference to Floodway Table in FO District 10 10. Accessory Apartments 1 1 1 1. Private Roads for Attached Single Family Developments 12 12. Family Day Care Home 13 13. Basic standards for grandfathered mobile home parks 13 14. Construction Trailers 15 15. Parking of Recreational Vehicles in Residential Areas 16 16. Weight Limits for Parking in AR and R Districts 1 ~ 17. Chart 1: Screening and Buffering Zoning Intensity Matrix 18 18. Screening of Refuse and Loading Areas 19 19. Structures Built Over Lot Line 20 20. Fences in Front Yards 21 21. Height Limitations in I-1 and I-2 Industrial Districts 21 22. Side Yard Setbacks for Zero Lot Line Detached Single Family 23 23. Lot sizes in R-1 District 23 24. Create an Exclusive Agricultural and Forest Zoning District 24 25. Reconsider Road Frontage Requirements for Lots in Agricultural Districts 25 26. Signage for Regional Shopping Centers 26 27. Extension of Existing Encroachments in Residential Areas 26 N-1 LISTING OF AMENDMENTS BEING CONSIDERED TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN 1994 A number of amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance adopted on August 25, 1992, as amended, are currently under consideration. These items are generally described below, including an issue statement and a brief description of potential solutions. For those items where specific language has been prepared, instructions are ita/icized, while deletions are indicated by the s~+lEe-eat symbol and additions by tl4tt. ITEM NO. 1 TOPIC: References to former agencies ORD. SECTION: All Articles under the Department of Environmental PAGE: Multiple Quality SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: Since the adoption of the ordinance, a number of agencies and boards have been consolidated into the Department of Environmental Quality, including the Water Control Board and the Division of Waste Management. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Modify Reference within the context in which they exist. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Amend the section cited be/ow as indicated: SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS (C) PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS - A water or sewer system owned and operated by: (1) a municipality or county; OR, (2) a private individual or a corporation approved and properly licensed by the State Corporation Commission prior to the adoption date of this ordinance; AND meeting the .re.quirements..of..the..State .Health Department and/or Virginia p~p~rtrnent ~f ~c~~ironr>lental Ea.ualKt~t. Sec. 30-29-1 Agricultural and Forestry Use Tvges COMMERCIAL FEEDLOTS - A site where animals are stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12 month period, and where the number of animals so confined include more than 300 slaughter or feeder cattle, 200 mature dairy cattle, 750 swine, 150 horses, or 30,000 laying, hens or broilers,..or, a_ny 'a~~irr?rl~~~i~€~i~ti~:~°~ental other site designated by the Virginia ;;;:.;:.;P:.;;;;;;;;;;;:.;;; ::.::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.::::.::::..::::::. iu~ls.~~<>13>~~tn~~~l~~~~ as a concentrated or intensified animal feeding operation" pursuant to the Permit Regulations for Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System and Virginia Pollution Abatement Permit Programs. April 6, 1994 N-I Sec. 30-29-2 Residential Use Tvaes ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGING SEWAGE SYSTEMS -Any device or system which results in a point source surface discharge of treated sewage which is installed as a replacement system for apre-existing individual single family dwelling with flows less than or equal to 1,000 gallons per day on a yearly average. These systems are regulated by the Virginia Department of Health under a general Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System...(VPDES)....permit.issued..by._the............ 8eafd~tl:~~tn~aD~partment o~ ~u~r~~e~~a~l ~:c~aitt~. Q~v(s[~n ~~ Waler Systems which exceed 1,000 gallons shall be prohibited and shall not be considered a Utility Service, Major as described in this ordinance. (Amended Ord. 42793-20) Sec. 30-74-7 Floodplain Area Provisions, Generally (B) Under no circumstances shall any use, activity, and/or development adversely affect the capacity of the channels or floodways or any watercourse, drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or system. Prior to any proposed alteration or relocation of any channels or floodways of any watercourse, stream, etc., within Roanoke County, .... approval shall be obtained from the ~~:.:f° ,>~;,;..i?. Further, notification of the proposal shall be .::.; ~t~l;> :.::::::::::::::::::.......... . given to all affected adjacent jurisdictions. Copies of such notification shall e forwarded to the iris!~::::::<:<~~«~!:::.;:<::.:;.:.:<:<:<.:.:.:.:<:«;:.::.:,::::::..:..«:::.:.:::.,.. tuai~; ~f'~~$ta~a~~a~t~. the State Departmerit~of Intergovernmental Affairs, and the Federal Insurance Administration. Sec. 30-82-1.5 Alternative Discharging Sewage Systems (B) 4. Wherever possible, the review and consideration of a request for a special use 2 April 6, 1994 / Y -' permit shall be coordinated with the review procedures and ..requirements _of VDH and the .;::.:::.:~,:<:::.,.:.:::....,. ,....:.: :: ;';,; fa1uat~t: ; :;l3iuis~v~:::~f<f..a..:tez. (C) 1. All proposed alternative discharging sewage systems shall comply with the re ulations and requirements of the '~!E :<::::;:.;:::.;:.;::<:;<.;;:;:<.:~~.:»:.:;:.: »::: ~::::::.::;:::::.;:...:..:....:<;;;., .; ; :>~:>:::::.:.::s~t3~~::::z~f:<:::a>ef and the Virgirna r€rr~e~t:>::>af:;;::E~vira~menta~:::>u~])#~E;:>::>t~iui::;:;>::.::: <::.:~ :::.;:;:~::.::.::. ~:::::: ~ f~~.;;;;:.;:.;:.;;;;:;:.;;;:.;:.;:.: ;:.;:.;;;> ::::::::::::::. ~ :::::::::.:..::........::..::.:.:..:: .......... ... Department of Health (VDH) pursuant to Section 62.1-44.2 et seq. and Section 32.1-163 and 164 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, as may be amended. The primary regulations which govern the permitting and installation of these systems are contained in the VDH regulations titled "Alternative Discharging Sewage Treatment System Regulations for Individual Single Family Dwellings (VR 355-34-400)." Sec. 30-86-4 Landfill, Construction Debris (A) 3. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all of the .:..;:..,. ::.....:....::..., ......... re ulations of the Vir inia Department of '~~':?~'!intaF 9........... g i~~'ij~, include special conditions of any landfill permit, for construction debris landfills. 6. No clearing or landfilling activities shall be undertaken until the appropriate permits are approved by the Virginia Department of e ~~rt~ ~~r~i~r;tC<ttflti. Sec. 30-86-5 landfill, Rubble (A) 2. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all regulations nt of trve~~<f~~lt~, include of the Virginia Departure .::::::.~ ::.......:...::..:..:........:......:..:: special conditions of any landfill permit. Sec. 30-86-6 Landfill, Sanitary (A) 3. The site development and operations shall be in accordance with all of the regulations of the Virginia Department of EI~a[~1e~t~l 'C~>ti, include special conditions of any landfill permit, for sanitary landfills. 6. No clearing or landfilling activities shall be undertaken until the appropriate permits are approved by the Virginia Department of \AFa~ts lr~ti i'~~tirttif(~[tlt. Sec. 30-86-10 Transfer Station (A) 1. The site development and operation shall be in accordance with.all..of.._the regulations of the Virginia Department of Ei~r~foftntal ~~~r, including special conditions, for a transfer station. 3 April 6, 1994 N-I 2. Noland development activities shall be undertaken until the appropriate permits are approved by the Virginia Department of ~!~~~~! ;uli~~. Notes: ITEM NO. 2 TOPIC: Enforcement of Private Covenants ORD. SECTION: Section 30-4 (B) PAGE: 2 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: This section strongly implies that Roanoke County will enforce private covenants (agreements), if those covenants are more restrictive than the public standard. We cannot legally do this. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Delete/modify the reference to private agreements. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Delete the language indicated: SEC. 30-4 APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS (B) Where the standards imposed by this ordinance, are more or less restrictive than any other standard imposed by public regulation ,the more restrictive standard shall apply. Notes: ITEM NO. 3 TOPIC: Special Use Permit Application ORD. SECTION: 30-19-1 Requirements PAGE: 12 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The ordinance does not require that an applicant obtain required variances prior to submitting a Special Use Permit application. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Add language similar to that in Section 30-14 that deals with rezoning applications: The Administrator shall not accept a Special Use Permit application for a lot or parcel that does not comply with the minimum requirements contained in the Use and 4 April 6, 1994 N- Design Standards for that use. In such situations, the applicant shall first seek a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals. If a variance is granted, the Administrator shall thereafter accept the Special Use Permit application for the consideration of the Commission and Board. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Insert a new (A) as indicated and reletter (AJ to (Bl: Sec. 30-19-1 General Standards {~}<{B Notes: ITEM NO. 4 TOPIC: Inadequate Frontage - Lots of ORD. SECTION: 30-23-5(B) Record PAGE: 18 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: This section of the ordinance, dealing with nonconforming lots of record, states that a lot of record that is nonconforming due to lack of adequate width, depth, or area may be developed provided all setbacks are met. The issue of lack of adequate frontage is not clearly addressed. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Include language in this section such as: A lot of record that is nonconforming due to lack of adequate frontage, width, depth, or area may be developed. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Add the language indicated: Sec. 30-23-5 Nonconforming Lots of Record h t is nonconformin due to lack of aerilg~width, depth, (A) A lot of record t a 9 .:.:.:..::.....................:...... or area may be developed, provided the development proposed on the lot is in accordance with the applicable use and design standards contained in the district regulations. 5 April 6, 1994 N- ~ Notes: ITEM NO. 5 TOPIC: Irregular Lots ORD. SECTION: Sections 30-28 (C) and 30-100-4 (B) PAGE: 30, 206 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The two Sections define and regulate the creation of irregular lots. Unfortunately, the definition is written in such a way as to exclude all lots from regulation. This should be modified. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Modify the definition to more clearly define irregular lots. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Amend the existing definition as indicated: SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS (C) Lot, Irregular: A lot of such a shape or configuration that ~y technically meets the ~'~~#~ re uirements of this ordinance but meets these requirements by incor gratin unusual elon ations, an les, or curvilinear lines unrelate P 9... 9. g rah `»:;'~t~~>~~al~adlf~. . .~ Notes: ITEM NO. 6 TOPIC: Family Day Care Home ORD. SECTION: 30-29 USE TYPES PAGE: 37 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: New State standards regulating Family Day Care Homes went into effect in 1 1 /93. For purposes of consistency, and following through on our intent to be no more strict than the State standards, we may want to modify our ordinance in the following areas: 1. The total number of individuals allowed in the Family Day Care Home, and 6 April 6, 1994 V '' 2. The individuals who are excluded from the total number counted. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): The current State standards allow 12 children in Family Day Care Homes. The zoning ordinance limit would need to be increased from 9 to 12 to achieve consistency. State standards exclude the children of the provider and any children who reside in the home when they count the number in the home. Our ordinance currently excludes "individuals related ... to the person who maintains the home" when counting the number in the home, but caps the total number at 9. In order to be consistent, we would need to use the State's language with no cap. We would still allow the care of 5 or less individuals as a home occupation. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Modify the use type description as fol%ws: Sec. 30-29-3 Civic Use Tvpes FAMILY DAY CARE HOME - A single family dwelling in which more than five but less than ~-A~'I individuals, are received for care, protection and guidance during only part of a twenty-four hour day. Individuals related by blood, legal adoption or marriage to home shall>> ~~<~~>~>~3~>~>itu>i~:;:~~.:::: ~.: d&::~..;;:;~.;;~.::;:::::::: the person who maintains the :........... The care of 5 or less individuals for portions of a day shall be considered as a home occupation. Notes: ITEM NO. 7 TOPIC: Summer Camps ORD. SECTION: Articles II,III & IV PAGE: Multiple SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: Under the present zoning summer camps operated by not for profit or religious organizations are not addressed in the zoning ordinance. This places existing facilities, such as the Girl Scout Camp or the Baptist Camp, both off Rt. 311, as uses that are nonconforming and not allowed anywhere in the County. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Create a new Use Type called Camps under the Civic use types and permit them in the Agricultural areas by right with a certain minimum acreage. Also, include provisions to screen and buffer activity areas when adjoining residential uses. 7 April 8, 1994 N- I PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Create a new use type, with appropriate Use and Design Standards, for Camps by inserting the fol%wing provisions: Section 30-29-3 Civic Use Types The fol%wing provisions create Camps as a use permitted by right in the AG-3 and AG-1 districts, and a use requiring a special use permit in the AR district. SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Section 30-32-2 (A) 3. E`p'~ (Page 48) SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Section 30-33-2 (A) 3. (Page 51) SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-34-2 (B) 2. s (Page 54) ~'`~~~>ne gal ~t~i i~de rs ........ ............................ $ April 6, 1994 ::. «:::::>::::>:::>:<:»> :::. :::..... ..:. ,; .. .:.:. 'r::: ;' .. rxx :>~h~tl:#3!~>~~::~::>~c?~tc !u~u~;~.~::es. ' v r Notes: ITEM NO. 8 TOPIC: Special Use Permits for Religious ORD. SECTION: 30-83-9 Assembly PAGE: 139 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The provisions to require Special Use Permits for new churches and expansion of existing churches was intended to address potential land use conflicts arising in certain situations: 1. Large churches of a regional nature, rather than community churches, locating in rural areas because of the cheaper land prices. 2. Expansion of existing churches on small, densely developed sites within or adjacent to single-family neighborhoods. 3. Use of limited prime commercial properties for churches rather than for commercial development. Since these provisions were adopted, several small rural churches have been subject to Special Use Permits when adding only classrooms and fellowship halls to serve their existing memberships. These types of expansions do not incur the land use impacts expected to be resolved through the Special Use process. There is a provision now to allow a 10% expansion of a use without having to obtain a Special Use Permit. For most small rural churches, classroom and fellowship hall additions easily exceed 50% of the existing building square footage. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Requirements for expansion of existing Religious Assembly uses could be based upon the type of expansion being undertaken: improvements to serve the existing church membership would require no special use permit while improvements to significantly expand the worship seating would. If lot and building coverage is a concern and the zoning district limits are not strict enough, additional coverage maximums could be established for Religious Assembly in certain districts. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: 9 April 8, 1994 N-I ...:<.:.:::>::.>.;~:::.::..::;:..::.:::.:> ::::.: ..:.:... ...::.......:...........,; . ~ ~ win ;:;cflnditiar#s::ar:,e:r~et: :~~c~stin ::.t~se.;:.#~a~w~d~~I:a1t::<.v..€::;~h~~a#la;:;::::::.~::.;;;:.;.:.;;:.::;;;;:::::.; :.::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~eexpo,~s~~n<a~:«an,:::;.;;;;;;;;;;,;;;;:<9.;:.;;;::.;:.;;:.;P::.;:.;;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..::.:........:::................... ... .: ~:,:.. ~:.~. ~ ~srdf~~~f~~?~I`~<~~fni~SAe~f~~:5~~:~r (I~)...>`<~td~lii7~n~f St~nE'#~fd5 ~#': th~~>eils't~#fit; :~':~:::::»::>::::::>:i~~~:;~'#~:V~::~~Ii~1~U~ ~t~rriblY l#~~~~`Fµ~~1{~`~ c'1' ..~p~'f.is'~~~Q:~;;::~::::;;;:;;~:;: ._: ~?~~k~SiQCtS L~f ~3FE~ti#1~ ~5~5 ~i~. Aer€~~~'(~~ b~ tit~(?~~' Notes: ITEM NO. 9 TOPIC: Reference to Floodway Table in FO ORD. SECTION: 30-74-4 (A) 1. District PAGE: 107 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: When the Ordinance was amended in October 1993 the Floodway Table contained in the Flood Insurance Study and referenced in the Ordinance was incorrectly referenced as Table 2. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Change the referenced Floodway Table from Table 2 to Table 4. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Change the referenced Table as indicated: Sec. 30-74-4 Delineation of Areas (A) 1. The Floodwav is delineated for purposes of this Section using the criteria that a certain area within the floodplain must be capable of carrying the waters of the 100 year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood 1 ~ April 8, 1994 N- I more than one foot at any point. These Floodways are specifically defined in Table ~ q' of the above referenced Flood Insurance Study and shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map accompanying that study. Notes: ITEM NO. 10 TOPIC: Accessory Apartments ORD. SECTION: 30-82-1 PAGE: 1 18 SOURCE: Staff, Board of Zoning Appeals, and Lee Eddy ISSUE STATEMENT: Following a year of actual use, some of the language contained in the Use and Design Standards requires clarification. In particular, the verbiage on restricting the location of the front door of the apartment needs to be clarified. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S1: Redraft key provisions dealing with the size and design aspects of such apartments. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Amend the use and design standards as fol%ws: Sec. 30-82-1 Accessory Apartments 4. Exterior entrances to the apartment shall be env-#~e~ ''<':.w. ~~ I~~~Ceci~::sc~::~s::>its;::eAp!eara~~>~f~gt~;;~~<;.;;;;:.'f.;:~.;<:.<~<:;;«:.~~:<: :.:: ,. ,.:,.:::::.::.:: „ . . :..... ...... ... .. , :.. «., ... ,.. , ::,,,........... . .. ,.~.,~~ ~.,, ., .,,,:tf r„^,........... . Notes: 1 1 April 8, 1994 ~r- i ITEM NO. 11 TOPIC: Private Roads for Attached Single Family Developments ORD. SECTION: Various incl: Section 30- 82-13snd Section 30-82-14 PAGE: 133 SOURCE: Staff and Steve Strauss ISSUE STATEMENT: The old ordinance defined townhouses as "two or more attached dwellings....", and allowed townhouses to be constructed on private roads. The new ordinance redefined townhouses to "three or more attached single family dwellings"...., and added a new definition for attached single family dwellings. An effect of this definition change is to prohibit attached single family dwellings, or two family dwellings on private roads. Some Roanoke County development projects, such as Waterford and the Village were developed under the old ordinance, and are no longer allowed under the new ordinance because the units were platted on private roads. The ordinance should be evaluated to see if it should allow single family attached dwellings to be constructed on private, roads. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Numerous. The challenge will be to clearly define what type of development we want to allow on private roads. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Add the fol%wing provisions to the sections cited to clarify public versus private streets are permitted.- Sec. 30-82-13 Single Family, Attached (D) Sec. 30-82-14 Townhouses (B) 8. Notes: 12 April 8, 1994 /v-/ ITEM NO. 12 TOPI :Family Day Care Home SOURCE: Staff ORD. SECTION: 30-83-6 PAGE: 139 ISSUE STATEMENT: Section 30-83-6(A)2 states A Family Day Care Home shall be operated only by the occupant who resides on the premises". This implies that the Family Day Care Home must be at the residence of the operator (care provider). The State standards allow a Family Day Care Home to be in the home of the provider or in the home of any of the children in care. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Change this statement to include both the home of the provider and the home of any of the children in the care of the provider. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Modify the Use and Design standards as fol%ws: Sec. 30-83-6 Family Day Care Home (A) 1. A~ Family Day Care Homes~~rv~te';=zp1i"..±1e shall comply with the Minimum Standards for Family Day Care Homes established by the Virginia Department of Social Services, as may be amended. [~7~Yi '~~~~yY~~`"'::::~~~~~~`#~`~~~`/~y~j~i~ri~•~~~~ y4'i~ copy of the license to operate a Family Day Care v. ...: .... w:. :.. ... ...... ... ...:.... ...... 4: Home; approved by the Virginia Department of Social Services shall be presented to the Administrator prior to the issuance of a Business License or certificate of zoning compliance to operate a Family #ea~e Day Care Home. Notes: ITEM NO. 13 TOPIC: Basic standards for grandfathered ORD. SECTION: 30-82-9 mobile home parks PAGE: 125-29 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: Virtually all manufactured home parks, with one or two exceptions were established prior to the adoption of the new park standards adopted in 1986 and carried 13 April 6, 1994 N-1 ~~ n forward in the 1992 ordinance. While the parks are grandfathered, they are a unique land use in that the units occupying the parks are changing over time. Concurrently the size (width and length) of the units are also changing. Currently the County is concerned only with the number of lots within existing parks when issuing permits for new units, in order to make sure that the number does not increase. No attention is being given to the size of replacement units and the impact on adjoining lots in the park or property owners adjoining the park. This has created a situation where some new units are being placed less than three feet from the park boundary. There is no guidance or direction in the ordinance to assist staff in this issue. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): At a minimum establish authority to replace existing units with replacement units, but establish a minimum setback from the property line along the lines of the setbacks required in the applicable zoning district. An alternative would be to add a provision in Section 30-24,Non-conforming Uses, that specifically addresses the replacement of existing manufactured homes in existing mobile home parks. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Add the fol%wing provision to the provisions for nonconforming uses: Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Bui/dings, Structures or Land Notes: 14 April 6, 1994 Add the fol%wing provisions to clarify the status and minimum requirements for manufactured home parks established before the amendments in 9986: Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park `~'~>?<~>>;>>„('hti ::rrt~rluf~~~~ir:~il!:>:D~r?~: i~ ~,krr~~d w~kl1 ~ c~ur~~t~:;~t~ti81 pr~~r t4 ci~~up~. Cy. C.: ~ .:::::::::::.;..:.;:::..:::.:..,......:. .... , N- ITEM NO. 14 TOPIC: Construction Trailers ORD. SECTION: 30-88 PAGE: 162-64 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: Under the current ordinance construction trailers are not addressed, although we have historically allowed them. In some instances these trailers have become controversial when they have been left on sites long after completion of construction. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Include construction trailers as an accessory use allowed in conjunction with other uses during actual construction, with a provision that they be removed after a set period of time upon completion of construction. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Add to the listing of accessory uses in the residential, civic, office, commercial and industrial categories the fol%wing provisions: Sec. 30-88-2 Accessory Uses: Residential Use Types (A) (A) (A) (A) 15 April 6, 1994 Sec. 30-88-3 Accessory Uses: Civic Use Types Sec. 30-88-4 Accessory Uses: Office Use Types Sec. 30-88-5 Accessory Uses: Commercial Use Types N-I (A) Notes: ITEM NO. 15 TOPIC: Parking of Recreational Vehicles in ORD. SECTION: 30-91-2 (A) 1. Residential Areas PAGE: 170 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: Since the mid 1960's, the Zoning Ordinance has required that all recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers be parked only behind the front building line on a lot. At the same time, Roanoke County historically has allowed lots with 50 and 60 feet of road frontage with side yard setbacks of as little as 5 feet (based on 10% of the lot width). In enforcing this, it is impossible for numerous property owners to comply with this requirement due to the historical setback requirements or in other instances the topography of the site. Many such vehicles are 8 feet wide from outside wheel to outside wheel. The only solution for property owners in this situation has been to store the RV or boat elsewhere, or sell the RV or boat. This issue is potentially part of a more general problem associated with having essentially only 16 April 6, 1994 Sec. 30-88-6 Accessory Uses: Industrial Use Types N-I one single family residential district (R-1) in the County for application to areas with a variety of lot sizes, development patterns, and neighborhood characteristics. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): A long term solution could be to establish a two tier system of single family residential districts with lot sizes, setbacks and other provisions carefully tailored and the district boundaries carefully drawn to address this and other problems identified (See item 23 and comments of BZA). In the short term, administrative criteria could be developed to permit the storage of such items in front of the building line under certain set standards, with basic protections for surrounding owners. This approach, however, could be very cumbersome to administer. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: None proposed at this time. Notes: ITEM NO. 16 TOPIC: Weight Limits for Parking in AR and ORD. SECTION: 30-91-2 (A) 2. R Districts PAGE: 170 SOURCE: Staff, Lee Eddy and Citizen Comments ISSUE STATEMENT: The provisions of the ordinance prohibit parking vehicles exceeding 7,500 pounds gross weight from parking overnight in AR and R Districts except for loading and unloading. Enforcement of the provisions rely on the Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) as registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles. Registered GVW is the weight of the vehicle plus the weight of passengers and cargo as determined by the owner. Since the registered GVW is determined by the owner, it is not necessarily the true GVW or reflects the size of the vehicle. Several large commercial vehicles can be registered with a GVW under 7,500 pounds and therefore not be in violation of the ordinance. Personal pickup trucks and vans designed and registered with a GVW exceeding 7,500 pounds would be in violation of the ordinance. If the intent of the provisions is to limit the size of vehicles, in many cases, specifying a GVW of 7,500 pounds is contradictory to the intent. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): The prerequisite for a solution would be to identify vehicles which are not acceptable for continuous parking in residential districts. Once those vehicles are identified, several variables could be considered to specify a limit. Conditions such as body style, number of rear wheels, number of axles, could be used instead of, or in conjunction with, vehicle weight. 17 April 6, 1994 N-I PROPOSED_AMENDMENTS: Notes: ITEM NO. 17 TOPIC: Chart 1: Screening and Buffering ORD. SECTION: 30-92-4(A) Zoning Intensity Matrix PAGE: 187 and summary listing of permitted uses SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The Planned Residential Development district was accidentally left off of Chart 1 of the zoning matrix which compares subject sites with adjoining sites in order to arrive at the proper type code (A through E) where applicable. n n POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Insert PRD between site zonings R-4 and C-1 and by use of a footnote to this chart, indicate that the Type of buffer yard would be determined based on the use within the PRD. 18 April 8, 1994 N-I PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Sec. 30-92-4 Applicability of Regulations (A) CHART 1 Site Zoninct: RR=3 RR=4 ~?Rfi C_1 CC=2 I_1 11=2 AdLoinina Zonin Tvpe AG-3 A A <f B B C C AG-1 A A ~~~; B C C C AR B B ~ C D D D AV * * ~ g C p D R-1 C C ~` C D D E R-2 B B ~' C C D E R-3 * B ~~~ C C D E R-4 * * ~- * C p E P€? ~~ `~ .... .... .... E N C * * ~ * C C C-1 * ~~- * * C C C-2 * * ~ * * C C Footnote: 1. The zoning administrator shall determine the required Type based on the existing or proposed use in the PRD and the district in which those uses are permitted. Notes: ITEM NO. 18 TOPIC: Screening of Refuse and Loading ORD. SECTION: 30-92-4(D) Areas PAGE: 189 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The sentence All use types shall be required to screen refuse storage and loading areas from surrounding views" can be interpreted at least three different ways. First interpretation: Screen only "refuse storage and refuse loading" areas. Second interpretation: Screen "refuse storage" and any "loading areas." Third interpretation: Screen "refuse," any "storage" and any "loading" areas from surrounding views. 19 April 8, 1994 N_i POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): First determine the exact intent of the ordinance. consider using old ordinance language "refuse service and outdoor storage" to replace current language. "Refuse service" clearly refers to a dumpster or similar equipment and "outdoor storage" is clearly not related to refuse. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Sec. 30-92-4 Applicability of Regulations refuse ~`tASi~~~ci;;<.;::::::::.~._::.;:.;:;.:.:;:;:.:;:.: (D) All :::::::from :»:: reas rte;>atl::~:o~n ::>d~~tcteCs>~ha~i>e<sc)re~~~:»: ~utr~~ar.::::storage a~--4ead+f-g a .::::::: ::::::::::::::::::.:::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::........:..:.......::....:::.....::. ....................... . ...... surrounding views. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened. In addition, ground level mechanical equipment shall be screened or landscaped. Notes: ITEM NO. 19 TOPIC: Structures Built Over Lot Line ORD. SECTION: 30-100-2 PAGE: 205 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: The ordinance does not clearly specify how to calculate setbacks when a structure is built over a common lot line between two lots. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Add language to this section: When a structure is built over the common lot line between two adjoining lots, and these two lots are under the same ownership, the lots will be considered to be combined and will function as one lot for the purpose of calculating setbacks. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Notes: 20 April 8, 1994 Sec. 30-100-2 Yard, Setback and Height Requirements N-I ITEM NO. 20 TOPIC: Fences in Front Yards ORD. SECTION: 30-100-9 PAGE: 207 SOURCE: Staff ISSUE STATEMENT: With the adoption of the new ordinance in December 1992, for the first time a provision prohibited fences over 4 feet in the front yard of any residence in the County. Since adoption numerous examples of practical difficulties in administering and enforcing this provision have surfaced. First, no permits are required by the County for fences which leaves staff in a reactive position. All enforcement therefore takes place after the fence is installed and the expense incurred by the property owner. Second, many locations exist were the front yards are 100 or more feet deep, imposing a limitation that has little or no bearing on public safety. Finally, due to odd lot configurations created historically, some peoples front yard is an adjoiner's side or rear yard, creating a situation where one owner can install a privacy fence that the neighbor is prohibited to install along the same property line. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Eliminate the restriction on the height of fences in front yards, or substantially restrict its application to specific areas in the County (i.e. R zoned areas or planned residential subdivisions). PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Sec. 30-100-9 Location and Design of Fences ,~~ ~, ~ ~ .. a s o~~~~-i r~-f~ei g#~- Notes: ITEM NO. 21 TOPIC: Height Limitations in I-1 and I-2 ORD. SECTION: 30-61-3 (C) and 30-62-3 Industrial Districts (C) PAGE: 92 and 95 SOURCE: Department of Economic Development ISSUE STATEMENT: The County Department of Economic Development has requested a reevaluation of the height limitations in the two industrial zoning districts. They have pointed out that while both industrial districts have specific height limitations, both of the commercial districts have unlimited height restrictions unless they adjoin an area zoned R-1 or R-2. It is 21 April 8, 1994 N-1 their position that the same approach should be taken in all non-residential districts. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Establish a similar approach to limiting height in both the commercial and industrial districts. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Revise the provisions for height restrictions in the l-1 and l-2 districts as fol%ws: Sec. 30-61-3 Site Development Regulations (C) Maximum height of structures 1. Height limitations: a. Sec. 30-62-3 (C) Maximum height of structures 1. Height limitations: a. Notes: 22 April 8, 1994 Site Development Regulations • #eet: N- I ITEM NO. 22 TOPIC: Side Yard Setbacks for Zero Lot Line Detached Single Family ORD. SECTION: 30-82-12 (B) 2, 3 PAGE: 132 SOURCE: Staff and Steve Strauss ISSUE STATEMENT: The current ordinance allows zero lot line development in R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 districts. The Use and Design standards permit a 20 percent reduction in lot size, lot frontage and front and rear setbacks, but no reduction for the side yard setback opposite the "zero yard". Mr. Strauss has suggested a ten foot side yard setback opposite the zero yard. In discussing this with the Planning Commission, it was felt that the side yard should be reduced to 10 feet in all situation. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Section 30-82-12 Single Family, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) (Bl 3. Minimum side yard opposite the zero yard: ''I'i3`~>'11 feet. Notes: ITEM NO. 23 TOPIC: Lot sizes in R-1 District ORD. SECTION: 30-41-3 PAGE: 61 SOURCE: Lee Eddy ISSUE STATEMENT: The current minimum lot size in the R-1 district is 7,200 square feet with public sewer and water. In many instances, there is a need for the smaller lots and smaller homes that the R-1 district currently permits. Not everyone needs, wants, or can afford larger 1 /2 acre lots or the homes that are typically found on those lots. There are two subdivisions under review now that contain the smaller lots: "Stokes subdivision" has predominantly 7200 - 8700 square feet lots and "Edgemont of Vinton" has many lots close to 10,000 square feet. Both of these subdivisions are in more densely populated areas, are served by public water and sewer, and are in topographically suitable areas. Stokes, looking only at total acreage of lots and not including acreage for road improvements, has a density of 4.8 units/acre. Edgemont of Vinton has a density of 2.6 units/acre. 23 April 6, 1994 N-I In the rural areas, however, densities such as Stokes are often not compatible with the public services that can be provided. Looking at subdivisions currently under review, R-1 areas that were previously A-1 are averaging about 1.5 to 1.8 units/acre, with the smallest lots ranging from 1 1,589 - 32,757 square feet. These developments are achieving Mr. Lochner's proposed R-1 B density of 2.5 units/acre, due in part to topography. Subdivisions with 1 1,000 square feet lots achieve this density because mixed in with the small lots are 1 to 3 acre lots. In many of the rural areas, development densities such as the Stokes subdivision are not feasible or possible and the lower densities will be the result anyway. However, there are active farming areas with more gentle landscapes (now zoned R-1) that could possibly accommodate the higher densities when they are developed later. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Along term solution could be to establish a two tier system of single family residential districts with lot sizes, setbacks and other provisions carefully tailored and the district boundaries carefully drawn to address this and other problems identified. In the short term, it would be very simple to change the minimum lot size in the R-1 district. This, however, has the potential of creating unforseen problems in the existing developed and developing areas of the County. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: None proposed at this time. Notes: ITEM NO. 24 TOPIC: Create an Exclusive Agricultural ORD. SECTION: and Forest Zoning District PAGE: SOURCE: Lee Eddy ISSUE STATEMENT: Mr. Eddy has suggested that Roanoke County adopt an exclusive open space/agricultural district. Such a district would prohibit residential uses except for those associated with a legitimate farm operation. Initially, the district would be included in the District Regulations (Article III) but would not be applied to land within Roanoke County. The district could eventually be used as a means of implementing a mountain top or viewshed protection ordinance, or in the short term could be applied to a property at the request of a property owner who wished the designation for tax or other benefits. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Drafting district regulations would be an easy task. The staff would use the existing AG-3 regulations as a model. 24 April 6, 1994 N-~ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: None proposed at this time. Notes: ITEM NO. 25 TOPIC: Reconsider Road Frontage ORD. SECTION: Requirements for Lots in Agricultural PAGE: Districts SOURCE: Lee Eddy ISSUE STATEMENT: The minimum frontage required in the AG-3 and Ag-1 districts is 200 feet and 150 feet respectively. These distances were intentionally selected to accomplish a number of objectives. First, the areas in which these frontages apply are designated Rural Preserve in the County's Comprehensive Plan. As such, growth in these areas is to be discouraged. The current ordinance uses both the minimum lot size and frontage requirements to discourage growth. While the frontages presently required, may not totally discourage piecemeal divisions, it should discourage larger subdivisions, particularly if new roads are required. This is a major part of the current growth management program implemented by the County. Beyond growth management, the road frontage requirements were selected to provide one measure of control on the minimum spacing between access points to property. Most of the roads serving these areas are narrow winding rural roads. Few of these roads have posted speed limits below the maximum. The only other control of access points is by VDOT who must grant access to each parcel. By requiring greater frontage, there is a greater chance that a safe and suitable access point can be found. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(Sl: The frontages could be reduced to the detriment of the objectives cited above. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: None proposed at this time. Notes: 25 April 6, 1994 N-1 ITEM NO. 26 TOPIC: Signage for Regional Shopping ORD. SECTION: 30-93-14 (B) Centers PAGE: 203 SOURCE: Board of Zoning Appeals ISSUE STATEMENT: The ordinance currently allows each lot in a C-2 district to have a total business sign allocation of 1.5 square feet of signage for each foot of street frontage. This ratio works well throughout the County. However, the ratio has limited the available signage at Tanglewood Mall and has resulted in variance requests before the BZA. The BZA has requested that signage formulas for malls such as Tanglewood be reevaluated, due to the malls large square footage, number of businesses, and distance from a public street. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Sec. 30-93-14 Special Signage Districts and Regulations (B) Shopping Centers. Within shopping center square footage that existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, new or existing businesses may modify or replace their existing attached signs provided the area of the modified or new signage is equal to or less than the original displayed signage. Modifications to freestanding signs shall be in accord with the district regulations. Notes: ITEM NO. 27 TOPIC: Extension of Existing Encroachments in Residential Areas ORD. SECTION: 30-41-3 (B) and 30-42-3 (B1 PAGE: 62 and 65 SOURCE: Board of Zoning Appeals and Lee Eddy ISSUE STATEMENT: One of the recurring items to come before the Board of Zoning Appeals are variance requests for expanding homes built when the side yard setback standard was based on 10 percent of the average lot width. This standard prevailed in the R-1 district until 26 April 8, 1994 N-I 1970 and in the old RE and A-1 districts until 1992. This approach was eliminated due to the difficulties in calculating an "average" lot width, particularly with irregularly shaped lots. POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S): Short of developing a separate zoning district for these areas (see discussions under Items #15 and #23), one technique for addressing some of the problems is to administratively allow expansions into side and rear yards that do not encroach into the required setback any further than an existing legally established structure. This would solve some, but not all, of these types of variance requests. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Add the fol%wing provisions in the Site Deve%pment Regulations for the R-1 and R-2 districts: (B) (B) Notes: 27 April 6, 1994 Sec. 30-41-3 Site Development Regulations Sec. 30-42-3 Site Development Regulations APRIL 12, 1994 County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning actual litigation, the water claim litigation case, in accordance with Section 2.1-344 A 7 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. (b) to discuss the disposition of the County~s interest in certain publicly held ,real estate for utility easement in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.3. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. (c) to discuss the disposition of the County~s interest in certain publicly held real estate in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.3. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. (d) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning probable litigation, to collect a debt owed to _the County, in accordance with Section 2.1-344 A 7 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. AT AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BUPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 RESOLUTION 41294-10 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: W• J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session Q AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEER OF APRIL 17 - 23, 1994 A8 NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEER IN THE COIINTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, local governments in America must constantly redefine ways to provide high-quality services to citizens while controlling costs; and WHEREAS, Volunteers can help local governments maintain and expand existing programs without increasing taxes; and WHEREAS, volunteers bring a variety of educational backgrounds and experiences that lend expertise to their government; and WHEREAS, in the County of Roanoke over 1500 individuals donate their time, skills and talents in such diverse areas as Fire and Rescue, Libraries, Social Services, Police, VPI Extension Service, Parks and Recreation, Youth Haven II, and many Committees, Commissions and Boards; and WHEREAS, these men and women dedicate countless hours of unpaid time, resulting in substantial tax savings while maintaining a high level of service to our citizens; and WHEREAS, in recognition of their many valuable contributions, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke Virginia does hereby proclaim the week of April 17 - 23, 1994 as NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEER FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its deep appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County for the many services provided by our volunteers. ACTION NO. n ITEM NUMBER K - AT A REGOLAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVI80R8 OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Joint Budget Work Session With Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a joint work session with the Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board to discuss their 1994-95 budget requests. The Chiefs Board has also requested time to make a presentation to the widow of Roy Crowe, Chief of the Fort Lewis Fire Department from 1979 to 1993. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS AND PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSESSION APRIL 12, 1994 INTRODUCTION: LEE BLAIR -CHAIRPERSON, ADVISORY COMMISSION I. Parks and Recreation Updates A. Bond Status Report ............... 2-5 B. Recreation Division Highlights ........ 6-14 1. The Brambleton Center 2. Camp Roanoke C. Parks Division Highlights ........... 15-18 1. Bond Facilities/Impacts II. Fee Ordinance .................... 19-24 III. Athletic Standards .................. 25-26 IV. FY 94-95 Budget/CIP ................ 27-30 (CIP information will be distributed at the worksession) CLOSING REMARKS: DICK COX, VICE-CHAIRPERSON, ADVISORY COMMISSION Q-a BOND PROJECT UPDATE NORTHSIDE: All four fields are finished except one which is being extended from a 200' field to 300' . All player control fences are in place and one backstop is complete. The High School teams should start practicing on the fields the week of April 20. The recreation clubs will begin use in May. STARKEY: Two new fields have been "cut in" and soils are scheduled to be delivered the week of April 11. Fencing will be started as soon as Northside and Hidden Valley are complete. The lighting project is underway and we hope to be complete by the first week of May. The creek bank erosion control project is complete except for minor landscaping work. BONSACK: The Park was seeded on April 6. In addition staff completed the picnic shelter and parking lot and have scheduled the delivery of the playground equipment the week of April 11. Fencing and infield soils will be completed in the Fall. Staff met with members of the Bonsack community on April 6 and they have agreed to construct the playground and are coordinating many other park improvements. VINYARD: Ground has been broken on the ball field portion of the contract and we hope to be able to seed fields no later than the week of April 25. The parking lot will be constructed 30 days later. Staff are preparing the bid for ball field lights and plan to bid the project in May. The restroom/concession stand is on hold until staff can work out problems related to permanent construction in flood plains. Fencing and soils will take place in the Fall. TERRIER FIELD: The project is 99 % complete. Staff are working with contractor for final aiming of the lights and are pursuing potential remedies to control excess spill light. RCCC LIGHTS: The project is 95 % complete. Staff are working with the contractor for final site clean-up and aiming. WALROND: The ground has been broken and the contractor has made significant progress on the site work. There is significant rock on the site and the plan has been altered to minimize its impact on the project. Staff hopes to seed the site the first week of May. WHISPERING PINES: The County has approved the plan and staff is preparing the bid documents. Cost projections indicate the ball field will be expensive to build due to the extensive amount of fill required. We plan to have the project out to bid in May and under construction during the Summer. The light bid will go out in a package with Vinyard's in May. MT. PLEASANT: The drawings were submitted to the County on April 1. Staff plans to bid the project in May. Staff have met with the Sports Club and have agreed to aJuly-August construction schedule. 2 R-a GREEN HILL SHELTERS: Shelter #1 -the slab has been poured and the roof has been constructed. A gravel pathway and bridge to the shelter are complete. Shelter #2 -the slab and posts have been installed. Both shelters should be complete by May 1. TENNIS COURT RENOVATIONS: Staff have developed bid package after coordinating projects with affected high school Athletic Directors. Bids will be out in mid April with construction to occur when schools let out. The school projects take priority, with other projects completed if funding is available. FENCING: The contractor is currently working at Northside and will proceed to Hidden Valley and Starkey Parks. The contractor will go to new sites as construction schedules allow. INFIELD SOILS: New infield soils have been added to 52 fields. Each field has received approximately 100 tons of soils. Staff have totally regraded these fields which has included raising the bases at all sites. Total amount of soils delivered and spread to date is approximately 5,000 tons. , WINDSOR HILLS/GARST MILL: Waiting for response from Southwest County Soccer relative to Board Action No. A-22294-3, Item Number E-4. 3 0 a w N F Fa- Z v a z a Y V C O .Q ~~- "~. w N II Z Q H U H Z O U U O 00 p m z Q W W z z W W 4 ~, 0 a w N z O m a a Y 3 N C O Q Q ~- ROANOKE COUNTY RECREATION DIVISION FY 92-93 PROGRAM REVIEW FY 92-93 was a very challenging and productive year for the Recreation Division. Service delivery, program development, and facility improvements experienced tremendous growth without associated increases in General Fund allocations. Over the past three years the Recreation Division's annual budget increased by an average 2 % each year. All of this increase has been in the personnel category for annual staff salaries. Operating costs, which make up 16 % of the Division's budget, have increased by only 1.87 % since 1991. The Division continues to increase and improve services without additional funds. This has been possible by increased public awareness of our services, consolidation of resources into fewer facilities, staff initiative to find sponsors which lower program costs, and production of revenue through user fees. Program fee revenue has increased by 32 % since 1991 to the FY92-93 level of $389,482. If projections hold true, the division will generate $564,000 in revenue for direct program costs in FY 94-95. Participation in instructional classes increased by 18 % from nearly 10,000 registrants in 1991 to 11,517 in 1992. The summer ACE playground, for children with developmental disabilities, continues to be a very successful program opportunity for youth in the valley. Therapeutics has also maintained a successful cooperative program with Roanoke City Parks and Recreation Department for the provision of services for citizens valleywide. Lifetime Sports reported record breaking participation in aerobics, tennis classes and tournaments, and hunter safety programs. This section provided 63 programs serving 728 participants of which 136 were children. Two areas of phenomenal growth have been in the youth athletics program and the After School for Kids (ASK) Program. Participation in youth athletics has increased by 31 % since 1991. We are currently serving 8,411 Roanoke County youth who play on over 647 athletic teams countywide. Sport opportunities currently available are Spring Baseball, Spring Softball, Fall Soccer, Fall Football, Winter Basketball, and Cheerleading. The community recreation clubs generate an estimated $400,000 annually to cover the cost of uniforms, safety equipment, and game equipment. This is a significant cash contribution to the youth athletic program which does not include the thousands of volunteer work hours given to these programs. We are very proud to announce that the After School for Kids program, currently offered in seven Roanoke County Elementary Schools, is now officially licensed by the Virginia Department of Social Services. Each site, serving up to 40 children, provides child care and recreation activities five days per week from 2:00 pm until 6:00 pm. The direct costs of the program are funded through the fees charged. We are currently offering programs at the following sites: Back Creek Burlington W.E. Cundiff Penn Forest Herman L. Horn Masons Cove Mt. Pleasant 6 R-a A new ASK site is developed when parents and the school request it. Once the initial request is made, recreation staff in the Community Education Section survey parents to determine if a minimum enrollment can be reached at the site. Already three additional sites are planned for the FY 94-95 school year as a result of this process. Those sites are Cave Spring, Glenvar, and Green Valley Elementary Schools. If all sites reach capacity next year, we will provide over 288,000 hours of child care service. Our goal is to provide this service at all 17 Roanoke County Elementary Schools in the future. Two licensed summer day camps have been developed and will be offered for the first time this summer at Herman L. Horn and Penn Forest Elementary Schools. If the summer day camp pilot sites are successful this will become an area for future growth as well. Staff completed the renovation plan for the move to the newly named Brambleton Center, formerly known as RCAC. The project was developed by involving program participants at the Ogden Senior Center, the Leisure Arts Center, a teen steering committee, and a staff task force. The renovations, being completed by Arnold R. Burton Vocational School students, have been in progress since November, 1993. Brambleton Center will provide the community with 15 classrooms, a 3000 sq. ft. auditorium/multi-purpose room, a 22'x22' demonstration kitchen, an approx. 3000 sq. ft. Teen Center for drop-in activities, a food vending area, a woodworking shop, and pottery studio. A special feature of the facility will be its accessibility in both the facility and the integration of services. VPI Extension Service has moved from rented space in Salem into the center, saving the County rental expenses for the future and providing an additional resource for our participants. The Ogden and Leisure Arts Centers officially closed on March 31, 1994 relocating to the Brambleton Center. Limited programming will begin on April 25, 1994 on the main floor to replace the programs offered at the Ogden and Leisure Arts Centers. The downstairs, which contains the teen center, should be completed by June 30, 1994. Some teen programs and services will be offered this summer with the "Grand Opening" tentatively scheduled for early September, 1994. The consolidation of staff, services and resources at the Brambleton Center allowed the Division to take a close look at how we do business. By carefully assessing our operation, focusing on successful programs, and analyzing the needs of the community the Department was able to maintain our current level of programs and reassign the Leisure Arts Section staff to the development of the teen center and programs -all without an increase in budget. Staff have also successfully privatized the ceramic program by awarding an annual contract to an area business for the provision of greenware and supplies. This allows us to focus on the instructional features of the program rather than the production and capital expenses of casting greenware.Another example of the consolidation can be seen in the Spring Schedule of Recreation programs on pages 4 & 5 showing the creation of the new Senior Citizens and Adult Leisure Services Section. 7 ~+ The Camp Roanoke renovation project has picked up momentum with renewed interest by volunteers, scout troops and the community in its re-opening. The division sees this as a wonderful opportunity for future program development for the our valley's children, adults, and business community. Without dedicated funding the work has been limited to security, maintenance, and clean-up projects. Staff will be pursuing grants, donations, and community support to keep the project moving forward. A detailed report is included in this packet to provide you with more information on this exciting project. The Special Events Section continues to grow and improve in the scope of programs staff are involved with. The focus is toward the stimulation of the local economy by creating tourism type events and facilitating existing successful events. Examples of these events are the Civil War Re-enactment, Native American Festival, the Polo Cup, the Commonwealth Games, the Va. State Rugby Tournament, Adult Softball Tournaments, Crestar Soccer Tournament, and the Soap Box Derby events. A current listing of our special events calendar is attached for your review. Thank you for providing the resources to serve the County's citizens; for making Brambleton Center a reality; for the new park and athletic facilities being developed by the bond referendum; and for the opportunity to revive Camp Roanoke. We are looking forward to the challenges of meeting the future leisure needs of the community. 8 ~- n O ~' 0 w JZZ Z C] J JOJ~JJJa aJ ~a Z Q Q J Q J O Z J J Z~ Z a Z Z Z ZO J O a J ~J,1 ~ J J o~~a~aJoaao~o~ooo a_,a~_aa w°-°-~°-pQwpowHw°ww~wpw~Ola-wOOj ~ ~ ~ J 2 J ~ ~ J J ~ (A ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ J ~ 2 J N ~ J J ooooNooNoNNoNNoNoNooNNNooo'~ zzzz~zz~z~~z~~z~z~zz~~~zzz Z 0 0 ti W d a O W O 4 W O O Z NNN~~~o~~~~o~~~o~o~o~o~~~o~o~o~o~~~o~ »~Q~t7 I ~01rr(~1n000a 11i1C0~Or I I ~r [':5a ppprN AOONNNrrN ~rrOrO~'''~NQ7 V U "`±~"""~`' oCaCO~~' ~~ n n i~r ~iie of Q o ornrnoOOoo~~ ~ aaa°° 00000000 oooor rr ~~ ~. UU U U U ~ > cn cn W w aN ~ z zaN w c~ a =a o z~oE- a~ odr. a ~ ~-N = wcn~-Z ~m a > a N ~N~w ~ tnz~o ~~wW U zvwp u-n zW C~ t-wv~pZ N~Da ~ ~o~~cn wQw~ z z~c~o~o ooco ~.a- w z t~ ~o N~zwW= zwou~NOw~~a~ ~z~~ _ ~ammZ~ F~zWWZ~J~~o mWma t~ ~WW!~Of-`=~ mpW~~d(~jOfntn~ =~OJ W }O J(nUp ~QO~=°pd~Z J}Z~ZYZUI--Q pW~ m JQ~~QQ ?V~? JpwQ?~~=QV~p}pg(N~3~ ~ Y WH N I ~ 1-~-_(g~Zc~ WQ~z~oczo~Joa~woo~oawmz~o~a a o a moU}~aV <tmgU=vY=Wwa~OJ~ O~NQ~~~YL1jZYZU~~YVYQZQ--~H~VJ moa>~YOO=zOgz~ ooo~-waaJaa ~NcnF- o~zcnaz Q J~z z O>_~~-c~~~ aacnN~zpaocoa~>-wa~aaJ~-zNZZz ocncno~ ooowzooo>_=o oo0azaaaz (nZ~LLZ~~~= N~UaUc~OC~OC~a.za>1-cna J U w a. `~ ~~ CAMP ROANOKE UPDATE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA OVERVIEW The purpose of this report and corresponding concept plan is to update the Board of Supervisors on the renovation needs of Camp Roanoke and the program plan for the facility and the surrounding environment. ^ GOALS AND PHILOSOPHY OF CAMP ROANOKE ^ CURRENT STATUS ^ PROGRAM OPPORTUNITIES ^ MANAGEMENT PLAN ^ ESTIMATED RENOVATION BUDGET ^ GOALS AND PHILOSOPHY Camp Roanoke is a unique camp to the Roanoke Valley; it is located very close to the citizens of our community (less than 20 minutes for most) and remote enough to believe you are hundreds of miles away from civilization. The 14 buildings and 110 acres joins the Reservoir property of Spring Hollow to total approximately 700 acres of beauty. The camp was first opened in 1925 to the Central District of the YMCA and served many young men from Virginia. It is the goal of the Recreation Department to see the camp opened back up to the youth and community while servicing as many different populations as possible with quality programs and camp opportunities. We believe that all young people are of worth and need to be valued. Our children make critical decisions daily which not only affect them as individuals but their friends and family as well. It is a proven fact that children with high self esteem normally make better decisions than those without a high level of self esteem. Their acquired self esteem will be carried with them throughout their adult life and hopefully will make the difference in them being a successful person. 10 2- ~ Some of the many populations that could benefit from Camp Roanoke are: ^ DARE CAMP -serving the 6th graders during the summer months. Building self esteem while showing the children there is an alternative to drugs and alcohol, FUN. (Supported by Police, Schools and Recreation Staff) ^ YOUTH ADVENTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPS -enhancing our existing summer camps for the ages of 7 - 17 years of age. ^ SCHOOL USAGE -field trips with Environmental Science, Physical Education, and other related classes during the school year. ^ SENIOR CITIZEN RETREATS - to enhance the existing senior programs at the Brambleton Center. ^ THERAPEUTIC PROGRAMS - to support the programs already offered to the citizens of the valley. ^ COUNTY TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES - an economical opportunity for all departments to have training sessions and a retreat close to home. ^ RENTAL OF THE CAMP AND SHELTER -has the largest picnic shelter in the County. ^ ROPES COURSE -can be marketed to corporations for staff training workshops to build teamwork and self esteem. ^ CURRENT STATUS Staff and volunteers have focused on clean up of debris, security, brush removal, roofing (new structure on the kitchen and new shingles on the lodge), building construction, electrical wiring and stabilization of the site. In addition, staff are proceeding with the construction of a low ropes course and are updating the renovation plan. Numerous Boy Scout Troops, retired senior citizens, the community renovation committee, inmates and staff have all done the work completed thus far. One cabin has been completely renovated by an Eagle Scout and another Eagle Scout project is under way with the renovation of the lodge building. A Scout troop from Masons Cove has spent many weekends doing major clean up of the facility, brush removal and replacing the shingles on the lodge building. A group of retired seniors are re-constructing the damaged kitchen roof and some of the volunteers have accumulated approximately 150 hours each. The inmate work force has started work and are under the supervision of a part-time temporary employee through the end of June 1994. We expect the inmate crew to be very productive on the renovation project. The major hold-up has been the lack of funds to get the infrastructure repaired such as the road, parking, electrical, plumbing and other construction needs. 11 ~-a With the help of a retired volunteer whom has experience in fund raising and marketing, we are in the process of developing a fund raising program. The program could include departmental special events, donations, foundation grants, community fund raisers, and employee fund raisers. The County Employee Advisory Committee has already endorsed the project and expressed an interest in developing fund raisers and work days. ^ PROGRAM OPPORTUNITIES The Parks and Recreation Department plans to operate the camp as a three season (spring, summer and fall) facility for day and residential recreational and educational program opportunities. This goal would not be obtained immediately but would be phased in as renovations are completed. Ideally, the camp should and could be available for year round use with the installation of heating systems in the dining hall, bathhouses, and several cabins. The proposed operational and renovation schedule is as follows: USE Engineering design and assessment DATE ESTIMATED RENOVATION COST (materials only) September, 1994 $25,000. Picnic shelter rental June, 1995 $77,020. (road, parking, plumbing, electrical, sewage) Summer Camp residential use June, 1995 $47,980. (dining hall, cabins, furnishings) Three season residential use April, 1996 $ 0 Pool operation June, 1996 $100,000. (replace pool and new filter system) Year round residential & day use April, 1997 $50,000. (winterizing buildings) Contingency April, 1997 25 000. $325,000. (These costs are non-professional estimates which will need to be confirmed through the engineering assessment.) With the diversity of recreation program opportunities already being offered by the Parks and Recreation Department, staff envision this facility as one which will enhance existing services. We anticipate that many businesses and individuals will enjoy renting the shelter for 12 k-a company picnics, reunions, and parties. This service was heavily used by the community when the YMCA operated the camp and at that time the shelter rented for $200 per day which included use of the pool. Staff will actively program the camp's facilities for outdoor education and adventure programs, senior citizen's activities, therapeutic programs, youth day camps in the arts and other specialty areas, and family oriented activities. We would network with the local business community to market the camp as the site for employee training and initiatives workshops. We will continue to work with the local court system and Police Departments to use the camp's resources to enhance the DARE and CDI programs for the area's youth. Area school staff will be contacted to promote the educational opportunities which may be available to students on field trips to promote science and environmental studies. ^ MANAGEMENT PLAN The Recreation Program Coordinator in charge of the Outdoor Education Section is assigned the responsibility for renovation and management of Camp Roanoke. In this capacity, he would be responsible for program development, reservations, marketing, operational management and oversight of maintenance for the facility. The possibility exists to move the offices of the Outdoor Education Section to the Spring Hollow Reservoir Interpretive Center where they could help oversee the camp operation, the reservoir park use, and security. The Interpretive Center could be located at the old home place of Jo Hall, already located on the property. Hiking, horseback riding trails, bike trails, rock climbing, picnicking, supervised canoeing, and fishing are opportunities being explored for inclusion at Spring Hollow. 13 ~-a, ^ CAMP ROANOKE PROPOSED RENOVATION BUDGET Electric: (inside and outside wiring) ............... $12,000.00 Pool: (filters and accessories) ................... 100,000.00 Plumbing: (septic tanks, underground pipe, fixtures) ...... 27,520.00 Dining Hall: Tables and chairs, materials only ...................4,000.00 2 Freezers, 2 door stainless, 50 cubic ft . ..............4,600.00 2 Refrigerators, commercial, 50 cubic ft . ............. 3,600.00 2 Range Stoves, 6 burner, 1 large oven ea . ............2,400.00 1 Dishwasher, commercial, 90 second cycle ...........2,800.00 1 Ice Machine ............................... 1,300.00 8 Cabins: windows and frames ...........................4,360.00 80 beds and mattresses, beds will be made .............7,400.00 3 doors .................................... 300.00 8 light fixtures ............................... 150.00 801ockers .................................3,000.00 roof repairs, shingles and materials (12 buildings) ........8,500.00 Staff Lodging: windows .................................. 200.00 12 beds and mattresses .......................... 660.00 ceiling repairs ................................ 300.00 121ockers .................................. 500.00 4 desks .................................... 650.00 2 files ..................................... 160.00 side vents .................................. 100.00 foundation (corner cement repair) .................. 1,250.00 Offices/Rooms: Ceilings .................................. 1,200.00 Light fixtures ................................ 500.00 Windows ..................................3,350.00 Carpet ................................... 2,200.00 Furniture ..................................3,500.00 Desks .................................... 1,000.00 Ropes Course construction : .......................7,500.00 Road Improvements: (crushed and sprayed) ............ 15,000.00 Parking Lot: (crushed and sprayed) ..................5,000.00 Winterization of all buildings : .................... 50,000.00 Contingency : ............................... 25 , 000.00 Engineering Design : .......................... 25,000.00 Total : ................................. $325,000.00 14 ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS DIVISION PROGRAM REVIEW NUMBER OF SITES, ACRES MAINTAINED: Since 1992 our division has acquired, through donation or other departments, 3 new park sites. This additional 79 acres represent an approximate 10% increase in Park lands, and includes 45 acres donated to Vinyard Park, 20 acres for a new park at Bonsack, and 14 acres for the development of the Merriman site. Although these lands are currently not in use, we fully anticipate utilization of these sites in 1995. These additional sites will require resources for quality care to protect our investment. 1992 1995 County Parks 23 sites (593 acres) 25 sites (672 acres) School Parks 20 sites (143 acres) 20 sites (143 acres) Public Grounds 25 sites 79 acres 25 sites 79 acres Total 68 sites (815 acres) 70 sites (894 acres) Our staff responds to a variety of snow removal tasks some of which include: plowing parking lots, shoveling sidewalks, application of chemicals & gravel, and cleanup of debris left behind after storms. Most occasions require overtime, including reporting to work several hours earlier than usual to provide access for other County workers and working throughout the night to keep access clear at Emergency Service facilities. Due to the severity and frequency of storms in 1993 & 1994 we have had to contract some snow removal. These services had to be performed without replacement of aged equipment or additional funding. Snow Removal Sites: Police Administration Fire Stations Libraries Recreation Centers 1 4 11 4 2 22 sites It requires athree-pronged approach to manage the mowing and trimming of County parks and grounds. We feel that through resourceful scheduling and use of limited resources, we have made the best use of contractors and park forces. A significant portion of our mowing is at Green Hill and Vinyard Parks. Our park forces can efficiently mow these two sites with a 15 foot mower rather than spending $1,100 a week for a contractor to mow Vinyard alone. Inmates are quite an asset to our operation. The sites they mow allow us to do work we cannot afford to pay to contractors. Inmates are also effective in doing finish work on ballfield construction, snow removal, landscaping, installing playground surface materials and other group projects. 1994/95 Mowing: Contractor 25 sites 186 acres Inmates 17 sites 59 acres Park Crew 28 sites 649 acres 70 sites 894 acres 15 ,~ .. NUMBER OF PLAYING FIELDS: The eleven (11) new baseball fields comprise a 24% increase in the number of athletic facilities. We are able to sustain adequate maintenance on the fields we currently maintain. Had infield soils not been provided in the Bond, we would have significant maintenance and scheduling problems due to poor infield drainage. Soils must continue to be added annually to sustain these improvements. Without a proportional increase in resources, both fiscally and in equipment, the overall field quality will diminish. The 20 % increase in soccer fields requires a 20 % increase in paint, aeration, fertilizer, seed and sod to maintain and repair sports turf. There is a 41 % increase in lighted fields over the amount we had in 1992. Our electrical budget adequately handles present youth athletic consumption, however, is insufficient to sustain this type of increase. Without additional funding, lights would have to be regulated, not used, or funds diverted from other sources. BASEBALL/ SOCCER/ SOFTBALL FOOTBALL LIGHTED 1992 47 25 22 1995 58 30 31 11 NEW 5 NEW 11 NEW BOND PROJECT SUPPORT: In an effort to make the bond dollars go as far as possible, park forces have taken up the responsibility to do a significant amount of site work on newly constructed fields. We have absorbed this into our work schedule, foregoing some other projects to complete the bond projects on time. For example, a team of three park staff has finished assembling and roofing two of the four new shelters. With our expertise, we have graded the new soils on 85 % of the ballfields for the 1994 season; the remaining soils will be completed in the Fall. Examples of other work done (and work hours) are: Northside -seeding, erosion control, infields, turf care 500 hrs Bonsack -seeding 20 acre site, gravel driveway & parking lot, picnic shelter 200 hrs Terrier Field -turf repair, site improvements, lights 70 hrs RCCC -will repair the damaged turf 10 hrs Green Hill -two new shelters 200 hrs Shell -new shelter 160 hrs Infield Soils -spread & graded 250 hrs Playground Surface Materials -completed Whispering Pines & Green Hill 80 hrs 14 sites remain to be completed. total 1,470 The Administrative hours below represent the estimated amount of time spent between 3 staff positions developing the design, bid, and monitoring construction. This to in an effort to make bond dollars go farther and sustain level staffing. 120 hrs per project X 21 projects = 2,520 hours 16 ~~~ The following is a listing of projects bid separately from the major site construction for ballfields: Fencin - 18 sites ADA Restroom Compliance - 8 sites with flush toilets Tennis Court Improvements - up to 15 sites Utilities (Water &/or Sewer supply) - 4 sites Athletic Field Li hg tiny - 6 sites (up to 11 individual fields) FUTURE FOCUS: An emphasis for our future management is safe, quality athletic facilities where fields are clustered together in one park, or their proximity makes it possible to drive equipment from on site to another, i.e., Shell, Starkey, Merriman. Increased use of these premiere sites demand increased attention and money. We anticipate a minimum annual expense of $1,200 per field above current target allocations. Below is a list of treatments necessary to achieve this goal. Upgrade turf maintenance to a premiere status of care at complex style sites (approximately 25 fields). •Routinely aerate - 2 additional aerators required •Annual overseeding •Aggressive fertilization program •Sod replacement in heavy traffic areas •Pre- and post-emergence, plus winter herbicide controls •Continuous training of staff •Soil testing and disease prevention The following improvements are indicative of our need to take care of our investments. With restrooms at eight parks, there has been little more than repairs and cleaning done since they were built. We spend $20,000 annually to rent portable toilets instead of building restrooms. Most of our equipment is outdated, used beyond its capacity, needs better service to insure dependability, and routinely replaced. Given the increases in fields and our equipment inventory & condition, it is necessary to upgrade our mechanical resources (i.e. ballfield related equipment) within the next 8 months. •Split rail fencing at Green Hill and Vinyard Parks •Replace old soccer goals •Renovate restrooms •Additional flush restrooms •Upgrade remaining sport light to metal halide (2 sites - 4 fields) •Maintenance equipment •CIP project list 17 ~~ SPECIAL PROJECTS: Signs are necessary to allow police to enforce rules and regulations in the parks. For the most part, these signs define the hours of operation, inform pet owners that animals need to be leashed, and prohibit alcohol. Several parks are difficult to find which requires some directional signs, and others need their entrances marked with the proper sign bearing the parks name. Only one shelter out of 12 has electricity, and 6 shelters need water. The water is important for cleaning purposes as well as a source of drinking water in the parks. Due to the variety of location of the shelters, it would be difficult to estimate the cost of installing these amenities. However, it is worthy of consideration for further review. 18 R-a FEE ORDINANCE Executive Summary: During the Board/Commission work session on Recreation fees in July, 1993, staff presented to the Board information addressing concerns about the inequities and inconsistencies in the existing fee ordinance. Included in the presentation were recommendations for changes in the ordinance. The Board acknowledged the "staff concerns" with the ordinance, while expressing their interest in recovering more indirect revenue from the adult programs, particularly in the area of adult athletics. Staff were directed to go back and review the policy with the Recreation Commission and the new director, and to bring back a new recommendation. Staff have completed their review and have prepared the following report and recommendations. Background In 1990, after a detailed user fee/cost analysis by David M. Griffith and Associates, the Board adopted a fee ordinance that established guidelines for the recovery of direct and a portion of indirect program costs. The fee policy, outlined below, essentially established a separate fee ordinance for each different section of the Recreation division, which upon implementation generated some inequities and inconsistencies. Existing Fee Ordinance Section Administrative Regis. Fee *Indirect Cost Recovery Direct Cost Recovery COMMUNITY ED 5.00/PERSON 25 % 100 LEISURE ARTS 5.00/PERSON 25 % 100 OUTDOOR ED $0 $0 100 SENIOR CITIZENS $0 $0 100 SPECIAL EVENTS $0 40 % 100 THERAPEUTICS $0 $0 20 ADULT ATHLETICS $0 $0 100% YOUTH ATHLETICS $0 $0 $0 *indirect costs are detmed as the prior year general tuna allocation ror tnac section. The allocations are shown on the chart on page 24. One of the major concerns with the ordinance is the inequities it creates in pricing programs. Based on the existing Recreation division organization structure, each section, with the exception of youth athletics and senior citizens, offers a variety of programs to people of all ages...youth, teens, and adults. Consequently, under the current fee ordinance (which requires different levels of indirect cost recovery), when programs are developed and prices set, you could have a different price for the same type of program in the same age group. 19 ~- a For example: assume the Leisure Arts, Community Education, and the Outdoor Education sections offered a youth program that meets for 8 - 2 hour sessions with identical instructor, supply and transportation cost, for a total direct cost of $256.00. When you factor in the requirement to recover a percentage of indirect cost the program fee for each youth would be $31.27 in Leisure Arts, $27.95 in Community Education, and $17.07 in Outdoor Education. As you can see, these are significant differences for the same service. Additional concerns with the fee ordinance are arising from the changes in the organizational structure and programs as the Recreation division opens the Brambleton Center and closes the Leisure Arts and Ogden Centers. The consolidation of these programs and staff to one location provides the Recreation Division an excellent opportunity to integrate and expand programs for youth, teens, adults, and seniors without increasing cost. This is being accomplished by establishing and promoting an integrated program and open enrollment policy, eliminating program duplications, minimizing segregated programs, and reallocating staff and resources to priority program areas. To be successful there needs to be a consistent and simple pricing policy for the public and staff. Prior to making fee ordinance recommendations, it is important to review service level expectations and user fee philosophies. As a County Department, Parks and Recreation receives the majority of its annual budget through an appropriation from the general tax fund. Concurrent with the receipt of this allocation is the publics expectation that a certain "basic level of service" will be provided in the form of Parks and Recreation programs and facilities....and that these services will directly improve the quality of life for the general population. In Roanoke County, the basic service level can be described as unstructured and unscheduled Parks and Recreation opportunities. Examples include neighborhood parks, open space, playgrounds, tennis and basketball courts, unscheduled picnic facilities, and the routine and major maintenance of these facilities. In addition, many communities, including Roanoke County, include the development and maintenance of youth athletic programs and facilities as a basic level of service. Youth athletics are included because of the numerous social and physical fitness benefits these programs provide. Generally, to provide programs and services above the basic level, communities choose to implement user fees. However, before establishing a fee ordinance and user fees, it must be determined what you wish to accomplish with such a policy. User fees can be established for many different reasons, including, but not limited to: 1. The improvement or expansion of existing programs and services. 2. Helping to reduce general tax subsidy and yearly general fund appropriations. 3. Adding new programs or activities. 4. Recovering the cost of a program with particularly high capital, operating, or maintenance cost. 5. Recovery of cost from a special interest or primary user. 20 ~~ It is important to establish the financial philosophy or goal prior to the development of the ordinance. Based on information provided by staff, one financial goal of the Recreation division is to generate additional revenue to cover the increasing cost of providing services. However, there are several additional factors that must be considered prior to developing an ordinance establishing user fees. The first is the issue of profit. In the private sector, prices are usually set in a manner which is expected to maximize profits. Making a profit is not an objective of the County in providing services. Therefore, it is commonly felt that fees should be established at a level that recovers some but not the full cost of providing the service. At the same time, we must be aware of and minimize any potential pricing conflicts with private sector service providers. Another factor to consider is the history of user fees in Roanoke County. As the department has grown over the years, citizens have become accustomed to the existing price structure and established service levels. Their perception is that these fees are fair and reasonable based on the current tax rate. They expect this level of service for the prices charged. Consequently any attempt to raise prices should be carefully thought out to minimize negative reactions. You must be very careful that price increases don't actually hurt business. Many people view recreation as a desirable service but not essential. Therefore if prices are raised significantly many citizens, particularly the economically disadvantaged, may choose not to participate. This would decrease revenue as opposed to any anticipated increase. I feel additional revenue can be generated without major price increases. To accomplish this the Recreation Division must increase productivitkwhile continuing to control expenses. Staff must move away from the "traditional" approach to programming where we try to be all things to all people. Government can no longer afford this approach to providing services. The recreation staff should take a market based approach to programming where programs are designed based on citizen needs and desires. An excellent example of this market based approach is the ASK -After School for Kids program. Staff identified both a need (after school day care) and a market (children of working parents) and developed a program that met a crucial need of our citizens. It is important to note that this program is community driven and provides a service above and beyond the ability of the private sector to provide. The most recent figures indicate a deficit of over 6,000 licensed day care slots in Roanoke County. While the ASK program is a logical expansion, we should not be afraid to eliminate those activities that are no longer meeting a need, are outdated, or ones that require a significant subsidy. These resources can and should be reallocated to priority areas including the new Teen Center and the development of youth programs. 21 <s ~ r RECOMMENDATIONS Adopt a fee ordinance which eliminates separate fee policies for each section. In its place, establish an ordinance that charges no fees for Youth Athletics, continues to provide discounts for senior adults and establishes the cost to be recovered at a minimum, 115 % of direct cost. All revenue generated above the direct cost would be returned to the Parks and Recreation Department to finance (with County Administrator's approval) special programs and minor capital improvements and purchases. This flexibility is important as it provides staff the opportunity and motivation to expand programs and the ability to make immediate improvements to priority program areas. For example, new recreation equipment could be purchased for the Teen Center, special programs could be expanded (drug awareness, etc.), computers purchased, or additional play apparatus added to our deteriorating playgrounds. Listed below are the standards staff would follow in regards to establishing fees for programs: 1. New and existing program fees would be established based on the current fee schedule, actual direct and indirect cost, and a yearly fee analysis and survey of the comparable programs in the surrounding market. As part of the policy no program class fee would increase more than 10% in any one year. 2. Senior Citizens and Therapeutic Recreation participants would continue to receive discounts, and no citizens would be excluded from participation for lack of funds. 3. There will be no user fees for youth athletics. 22 2-a 0 N 'C a 0 d d a ~ ~ tNR't1 ~d} P" ~ W ~i ~ C~j Ri f~; ~ r ~ ~ a~o_ r c~ ~ '~ ~ I~ °~ (O ~ (` f~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ifl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is ~ F~ UU I~~~ s~ ~~ f ~ as E~ ~LL ~.~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~ ~ .2~ ~~ .~_ ~ c ~ ~ V _ p` ~ ~U vU ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ o ~ o U o ~' ~ U ~' a U ~ a ~ ~ -a ~ ~ 'v (U U U~ i ti co o c 0 c 0 c 0 c U o c ~ v~ ~ t5 ~ ~ a z o ~; ~ ~~ O _ ~ 'v ~ ~ .. ~a a ~ 00 8 ~ + ~ ~ .~ o ~ N p N 3 C ~ ~ ~ !+ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ O .0 ' z C _ ~ N _ +, ~ ~ A ~ -- g ~ +' ~ qQf ~ ~ _ ~ + + s tl l N ~ F,j ~ ~ Q CJ .~. ~ N ~ Q- ~ij p p p O O O ~a" r ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ .a ~ ~$ U t N ~ vvv~~~i ~ 0 ~ ~ + C C N p ~ O p ~ ~ -~ ~ O V V p + ~ Q ~ = Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ` ~ G ~ ` O~~ O~j~ WWW ~ ~ ~ 4 c 'p ~ o = ~ ` C ~_ ` 'O ~ ~ ~ yy y ~ N N "6 "~ ~ = 'a + + '~ 'g ~ ~ '~ ~, ~ ~ 3e ~ ~ y m ~ g a ~ 0 0 a i~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ o w ~ ~ ~ g 8 ~~~~~ $~ zy ~ o ~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ r N _Y ~ ~ W "' m SJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ W !l W ~ ~ Y ~ q o c o ~ ~, o .$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.g- ~~~ ~~ ~~a~ ~ ~ cc ~~~ ~~ U > oc a ~ _ .~ ~ ~ v~cn ~ c .~ ~ a i a ,,, N .8 .~ ~a ~ ~. ~~ ~~ 2~ ~~ c~ 0 Ql Z ~~ ~~ ~a a~ ~$ d ~ H N~ 8 o_ ti ti a O O ~~ W U~ 2W Qm ~Z aQ 2~ ~~ O~ U~ O Q' Q~ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ co n t9 nC0 m ao N Ol N H [7 M M to df M! ~-' _. {t11 1~ ~ N N ~ O lh ~ W N ~ ~ N N W m ~ d! bf r~ to ~ b3 iA Y! m ~ ~ n v ~ O1 0 R to N If! fD 71) iA m ~ ~ H n ~ ~ ~ us O~ v o o ago o aNO ~ ono m ~ S? '~ ~ ~- ( v_ n ~ o v ~ N n Qf O C7 O Of Gr~pp r (p ~ O m N ~ ~ h ~ ~ fA ~ ~ I H H ml N :::::~ ~ N N m ~ ~ M r O r ~ m r N N n Fkl ll6E~ii ... ,~ .. {~ r O N 1~ m ~ N N O ~ N r ~ ~ N d' ~ N N In m r m o o r ~, r ~, .~ ~ m n ~ W N r O W ~___..K .~ r N O 00 tD r t0 t0 O N ~ N ~ N ~ O N U H !,. w J ~ I Q Z J '. 11i ~` 3 `~ ~; [ N O I- ~ ~ Q ~ O ~ N U w w = E- Z p f- q ~ o ~ O ~ ~ O O a O ~ W } Z ~ O U ~ ~ Q w N w ~ a .,., ,n ~ O N w w LL ~ ~ w N U z w to * to z w w ~ w a to N O ~ w q H O F- o2-a Y ai Q F N U w 24 ~~ # ATHLETIC STANDARDS The Parks and Recreation department has initiated a review of the youth athletic program to help manage a number of issues within this program area. The benefits of the process are many and should provide County staff and the citizens with enough information to: Develop & establish standards to govern field/facility use Determine future field and facility needs Maximize use of existing facilities Upgrade maintenance of outdoor sites Ensure equity among sporting groups Assist in developing yearly program/operating budgets This concept was presented to the Recreation Clubs Presidents at their March meeting. To be successful, the Recreation division needs to work closely with the Recreation clubs to establish reasonable standards that are fair and affordable. As part of the process, the youth athletics staff are developing a survey questionnaire that will be submitted to all the Recreation clubs and selected recreation departments to solicit feedback on what their current standards are, and what they feel they should be. Once this information is collected, staff will meet with the Club Presidents to present their findings. From these meetings, we hope to reach a consensus on minimum athletic standards. After this has occurred staff will forward a report with recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. A draft of sample standards is attached for your review. 25 ~Z- 2. YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM STANDARDS (THESE STANDARDS WERE DEVELOPED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY BASED ON 1993 PARTICIPATION) STANDARDS FOR YOUTH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL During the practice season, each team in the Little League T-ball & Minors and Dixie League Mini-Mites & Angels shall have two 1.5 hour practices per week for a total of 3 hours weekly. Children 10 and under shall not play or practice past 8:30 p.m. on a school night. During the practice season, each team in the Little League Majors, Belles, Debs, and Pony-tails shall have two 2 hour practices per week for a total of four hours weekly. During the practice season, each team in the Little League Seniors shall have two 2 hour practices per week for a total of four hours weekly. Each league shall have an 18 game season. During the game season, each team shall have two 2-hour games per week and one 1.5-hour practice per week. No games or practices scheduled on Sundays. STANDARDS FOR YOUTH SOCCER During the practice season, 6 year old co-ed instructional leagues will have two 1-hour practices per week. During the practice season, 7 & 8 year old boys and girls instructional leagues will have two 1.5-hour practices per week. During the practice season, 9 year old and up boys and girls, division 1-4 leagues, will have two 1.5-hour practices per week. During game season, 6 year old co-ed instructional leagues will have one 1-hour practice & one 1-hour game per week. During game season, 7 & 8 yr old boys and girls instructional leagues will have one 1.5-hour practice per week & one or two 1-hour games per week, not to exceed six 1 hour games per month. During game season, 9 year old and up boys and girls, division 1-4 leagues, will have one 1.5-hour practice & one or two 1-hour games per week, not to exceed six 1 hour games per month. A 12 game season will be established for the soccer program. 26 FY 94-95 ::.: ^ .f ~~~~~T~d~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ E~~~~Y ~ Section I :~earn~r~~ +~aQera~m ~ ;E oreu i ASKJCamps/Craig Center 79,571 950 80,521 TeensJYouth 70,626 2,500 73,126 Outdoor Education 59,012 1,300 60,312 Senior Citizens 110,674 3,775 114,449 Special Events 65,646 4,748 70,394 Therapeutics 88,368 18,056 106,424 Adult Athletics 66,126 450 66,576 Youth Athletics 180,926 9,321 190,247 Rec Administration 248,893 132,869 381,762 TOTAL 93-94 ,053,098 .. ,., bud95sum.wkl 27 TOTAL 93-94 $1,033,680 ~~ PARKS & RECREATION ADD-BACKS BY DIVISION (Not in priority order) DESCRIPTION ~ourrr JUSTIFICATION REQUESTED SECTION: RECREATION ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL: Part Time 13,042 MEOI 32 hrs/wk for renovation of Camp Roanoke. CAPITAL: Motor Vehicle Replace 29,000 Replace '80 Dodge Wheelchair van w/101,860 miles. D P Equip. Replace 9,875 Upgrade 5 "286 Personal Computers" with 486 models, per MIS request, to be compatible with the County's communication & LAN network. Bldg. Improvmnts/Additions 15,000 Carpet replacement in the hall & 10 classrooms @ Brambleton Center. 10,000 Paint exterior & interior -Brambleton Center. Site Improvements 25,000 Install exterior playground & surface materials to qualify site to offer childcare programs & services @ Brambleton Center. SECTION: COMMUNITY EDUCATION PERSONNEL: Regular 5,590 Increased cost to convert Rec Tech PT to FT. OPERATING: Repairs Bldgs & Grounds 4,000 Replace worn out, torn, and dangerous the in the Craig Avenue Center ceramic classroom & carpet in the exercise/weight room. SECTION: TEENS/YOUTH PROGRAMS OPERATING: Public Information 3,000 Create, print & distribute pamphlet on Teen Cntr. CAPITAL: Furniture & Office Equipment 10,000 Purchase tables, chairs, booths, game tables, computers and video games. SECTION: SPECIAL EVENTS OPERATING: Advertising 5,000 Equipment & Supplies 4,000 SECTION: ADULT ATHLETICS CAPITAL: Site Improvements 28,500 To upgrade the promotions of Special Events! Improved P.A. system and stage at Greenhill for major events such as Civil War, Pow Wow, etc. Burton Softball Complex: Surface treat entrance road, 6,000; Improve parking lot lighting, 2,500; Install public restrooms (small prefab) - 20,000 28 ~~ DESCRIPTION aMOUrrr JUSTIFICATION REQUESTED SECTION: YOUTH ATHLETICS PERSONNEL: Part Time Supervisor 3,000 Officials OPERATING: Equipment and Supplies SECTION: PARKS PERSONNEL: FULL TIME PART TIME OPERATING: CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REPAIRS EQUIPT. ELECTRICITY TELEPHONES LEASE/RENT (PORTAJOHNS) LEASE/RENT (EQUIPMENT) SIGNS MEDICAL 1,100 1,805 Increase in basketball supervision for Saturday practice in N. Roanoke and Cave Spring. Increase of 2 % in all sports to keep up with the average growth in the past 5 years. $1,805 for awards and trophies that were paid by the $5.00 per team fee. 53,708 Maintenance of additional bond sites & facility development includes basic field, turf and grounds maintenance @ new bond sites (Northside, Starkey, Bonsack, Walrond, Whispering Pines) & existing facilities. 9,695 7/94 - 10/94 PT staff to assist in maintenance at the following: Northside-2 new ballfields; Starkey-2 new ballfields; Bonsack-Ballfield, shelter, playground, mowing & parking; Green Hill-2 new picnic shelters. 19,976 3/95 - 6/95 PT staff for new facilities. Labor in addition to the above to maintain additional facilities on-line in 1995: Vinyard-Parking, 2 new ballfields; Whispering Pines-New ballfield, tennis/basketball courts; Walrond-2 new ballfields, new soccer field; Mt. Pleasant-New ballfield; Northside- Football/soccer practice field. 30,000 Contracted turf maintenance for upgraded turf maintenance @ key level 1 athletic complex sites/fields: Green Hill-5; Walrond-4; Northside-4; Vinyard-5; Shell/Starkey-7 10,000 Keep pace with repairs to aging fleet of equipment 8,500 New lights on athletic fields: Vinyard 3 soccer; Whisp. Pines 1 bseball; Vinyard 1 bseball; Starkey 1 bseball; Mt. Pleasant bsball/socc; Southwest 2 bseball; Burton (underfunded amount) 3,000 Cellular telephone service for 2 FT staff 1,800 Bonsack-2; Vinyard-2; Walrond-2; S.W.-2 10,000 Rental of heavy equipment while Department equipment is down for repairs. 4,000 Regulatory signs for 4 Bond sites: Bonsack, Northside, Starkey, S. W. 2,000 Hepatitis B vaccinations 29 2-a DESCRIPTION BLDING/MAINT. MATERIALS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NEW Equipment (replace) Small Capital (replace) Motor Vehicle (replace) AMOUNT REQUESTED 15,100 104,900 36,000 30, 000 24,387 JUSTIFICATION New athletic field services including: mowing, paints, soils, bases, repairs, etc. on quality complex sites: Northside-2 ballfields, $2,000; Starkey-3 ballfields, 2,600; Vinyard-3 soccer, 3,000 - 2 baseball, 1,000 (1/2yr); Whis. Pines-1 baseball, 500 (1/2yr); Walrond-2 baseball, 1,000 (1/2yr)-1 soccer, 700 (1/2yr);Mt. Pleasant-2 fields, 2,400 (baseball incl.) New athletic field services, on non-complex sites: Bonsack 1 ballfield, 500; RCCC bsball/ftball, 1,000; S.W. 2 field, 400 (1/2yr) For new or upgraded sites: Northside 2 new fields; Bonsack new Park; Starkey 2 new fields; Vinyard 2 new fields; Whis Pines 1 new field; Walrond 3 fields; Southwest 2 fields. Equipment needed=2 large mowers, 2 infield machines, 5 trailers, 4 finish mowers, 1 aerator, 1 paint machine, 5 string trimmers, 4 Gravely Pro 50, 4 snow plows Backhoe replace Ford Backhoe 1974 w/34,683 hrs Tractor replaces Massey Ferg 1967 w/29,262 hours 1 large mower; 3 paint machines; 5 line markers; 1 Woods mower 2 sets of soccer goals (Hidden Valley/Garst Mill) Replace 2 large dump trucks $45,000 ea: '78 Ford Dump 195,795 mi; '80 Ford Dump 200,815 mi Replace 1 '83 4X4 truck w/snow plow 161,622 mi 3,000 90, 000 22,000 SECTION: STREET SIGNS PERSONNEL REGULAR 17,903 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000 REPAIRS (RADIO) 55 REPAIRS (VEHICLE) 500 REPAIRS (OTHER EQUIPT) 200 SMALL EQUIPT/SUPPLIES 700 STREET SIGNS 13,100 BLDG &MAINT. MATERIALS 4,500 RADIO PARTS 100 GAS, OIL & GREASE 600 TIRES, TUBES & PARTS 500 FT Street Sign Technician For phase I of upgrading street signs at major intersections as required by VDOT. (Requires hydraulic lift) To maintain existing radio in sign van. For repairs to Street Sign van. To maintain sign making equipment Equipt. & tool purchases for street sign maintenance Replace 160 street signs annually for E-911 support. Phase I of upgrading of street signs at major intersections as required by VDOT (materials only) & replacement of old black & white, street signs. Poles & hardware for installing signs Purchase parts for radio repairs For Street Sign van For Street Sign van 30 ~- PARKS AND RECREATION CIP PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TITLE: General Renovations & Repairs of Parks & Public Land EST. COST: $425,000 DESCRIPTION: The majority of existing public parks/land areas have experienced noteworthy deterioration due to the lack of repair and preventive maintenance over several years. Areas of concern include turf management, repair of small buildings, restroom repairs, parking lot/service road repairs, playground apparatus repairs, renovation of pedestrian bridges, erosion control and lighting. (ATTACHMENT #1) PROJECT TITLE: Renovations-Baseball/Softball Fields EST. COST: $426,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will renovate existing baseball/softball fields located in twenty (20) individual parks/public land areas (i.e., 46 fields) and replace infield fill (as required), backstop and fencing repair/replacement (ATTACHMENT #2), outfield turf renovation (ATTACHMENT #3) and selective players' benches. PROJECT TITLE: Replacement of Plav rog unds EST. COST: $120,000 DESCRIPTION: The 1992 bond approved funds to begin installation of playground surface materials at existing playgrounds. Staff have identified the following playgrounds for priority replacement: Brookside, Mt. Pleasant, Clearbrook, Stonebridge, M. A. Banks, Walrond, Garst Mill). Almost every site will require reconfiguration of existing play structures. Components, with the exception of swings, are outdated and need to be replaced. Most of our existing playgrounds are made up of swings and little else. PROJECT TITLE: Renovations-Public Outdoor Tennis Courts EST. COST: $318,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will renovate, resurface & repair the existing County outdoor tennis courts, located in ten park and school sites (total of 44 courts) (ATTACHMENT #4). PROJECT TITLE: Renovations-Public Outdoor Basketball Courts EST. COST: $318,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will renovate, resurface, and repaint existing courts located in 16 individual park sites. (ATTACHMENT #5) PROJECT TITLE: VinXard Park Phase III EST. COST: $603,000 DESCRIPTION: This project is needed to complete the master plan for the existing site which includes a playground, two picnic shelters, two basketball courts, four tennis courts. Needed to provide access and comprehensive recreation on the additional acreage is parking, access, and bridge, trails and nature interpretation, other park amenities, utilities, and restrooms. PROJECT TITLE: Replace Outdoor Sports Lighting EST. COST: $162,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will replace antiquated, expensive outdoor light systems on the tennis courts and athletic fields. Sites include: Bent Mountain tennis, Burton I, removal at Gearhart tennis, removal at Mt. View, replace at Jaycee field and batting cages. PROJECT TITLE: North Roanoke Community Center EST. COST: $6,000,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will construct a new multi-purpose Roanoke County Community Recreation/Athletic Center to be located within the North Roanoke County area. This facility will provide appropriate indoor facilities for leisure and athletic opportunities for the community and athletic facilities for the youth at Northside Middle and High Schools. Site to be determined at a later date. PROJECT TITLE: Whispering Pines Phase III (ON HOLD) EST. COST: $82,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will construct and develop approved restroom facilities. PROJECT TITLE: Picnic Shelters EST. COST: $160,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will construct and install accessible picnic shelters at Whispering Pines, Starkey, Craig Center, Mt. Pleasant, Walrond, Goode, Stonebridge, and Garst Mill parks. PROJECT TITLE: Starkey Park Phase III EST. COST: $170,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will construct a restroom, concession, storage building, and playground. PROJECT TITLE: Recreation Center Renovations & Repairs Phase II EST. COST: $25,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will install storm windows, floor the in the weightlifting and ceramic rooms, window blinds, interior and exterior paint at the Craig Avenue Recreation Center. PROJECT TITLE: Senior Citizens Center & Community Center EST. COST: $73,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will convert the former RCAC facility on Brambleton Avenue into a Community Recreation Center with a focus on programming for senior adults, citizens with disabilities, teens and youth. Phase II development will provide carpeting and tile, HVAC improvements, landscaping and picnic area, aesthetic improvements, inside play area for children, and improvements to the teen center. PROJECT TITLE: Walrond Park Phase III EST. COST: $723,000 DESCRIPTION: This project will develop Walrond Park by adding two basketball courts, parking, restrooms and storage, playground, community center, grading/drainage, trails, picnic shelter, security lighting, landscaping and amenities. PROJECT TITLE: Spring Hollow Park EST. COST: $400,000 DESCRIPTION: The Spring Hollow Reservoir site and former YMCA Camp are on Dry Hollow Road adjacent to the reservoir. This project consists of developing the 700 acre site around the reservoir as a public park for fishing, hiking, picnicking, and other appropriate outdoor recreation interests. Development of the reservoir depends upon Health, Water, and Utility Department requirements. PROJECT TITLE: Camp Roanoke Development Phase I EST. COST: $325,000 DESCRIPTION: This project consists of renovating Camp Roanoke as a residential summer camp and retreat center. PROJECT TITLE: Burton Athletic Complex EST. COST: $147,000 DESCRIPTION: This facility is located adjacent to the Arnold R. Burton Vocational School and serves as the site for adult softball league and tournament play. It contain three regulation softball fields which supplement the state and regional tournaments held at the Moyer Athletic Complex and often is the only site for USSSA and NSA Softball Tournaments. This facility needs to have enlarged and paved parking, permanent restroom and concession building, landscaping, general security lighting, athletic field lighting improvements and playground and picnic shelter. PROJECT TITLE: Green Hill Park Phase III EST. COST: $539,200 DESCRIPTION: This project will develop Green Hill Park by providing accessible playground, split rail fence, landscaping, two soccer fields, football field, lights and electricity for special events, parking, outbuildings, trails and amphitheater. ATTACHMENT #1 GENERAL RENOVATIONS ~'LA~i~'G1~a~f1N~S lST PRIQRITX: Gearhart Oak Grove Catawba Craig Willie Martin 2I~A PR1'pRIT Back Creek Mason ove Bent Mountain Mt. Pleasant Burlington Mt. View Cave Spring Elem. Oak Grove Fort Lewis Penn Forest Glen Cove R. E. Cook Glenvar Elem. W. E. Cundiff Green Valley RCOS Herman L. Horne RIySTROtjI~v1~: Clearbrook .. ........................ Stonebridge .... _.. Garst Mill Oak Grove Mt. Pleasant SPLIT RA'~L: Green Hill Clearbrook Vinyard Garst Mill Goode Shell Bonsack 1~II`: LICIT PAR~N' .~0'T'S Insecticide treatment & stain cabin at Walrond Concessions at: Stonebridge Clearbrook Walrond Burton Happy Hollow Vinyard Walrond Whispering Pines Lower Green Valley Mt. Pleasant Shell RCCC Green Hill Shell Mt. Pleasant Garst Mill ATTACHMENT #2 °~~ V] W ,r, N .,- a N ~ O O ~' N Q Q N QW Q ~ ; O O ~ i~ ~ ;'~ ~ 'C O ~ O ~ ~ z., ~ ~ Q ~ ' G ~ N ~ ~ O i" i. % U t7 x x v v c~ c7 as z as as as WQ .-a ~ N ~ W M ~ '~ N ~ ,.~ F"~, -d ~ ~ o y ~ Q O~ .~ ~ .~ ~ U a U W a w Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W w Z M O a ~--~ N M tt ? ~ U O W Q ~ x ~_ x ~_ x ~_ x o U ~ ~ E-- %~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ Q ~ ~ c7 ~ C7 ~ ~ ~ c7 ~ ~ x O z ~ Q o 0 o z ~ z ~ M Q ~--~ N M O O O z .~ .~ .~ U vi v~ to C~ W W z w w ~ z w ~ 3 ~ R+ N ~ ~ ~' p. W .-~ N Q O °' ~, ~ N M ~ ~ ~ a~ -- N Q y .--. ' O ~ , x x x x y y U 'O .a +O-+ ~ ~--~ N ~ . . x o 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 3 3 t ~ ~ ti z., ~, ~., c7 c7 U c c oa as W z w Q QW a ~~ ~ . F"~ ~ .-. ~ _C M ~ N M d' ~~- OQ .7'i 'O 'b ~ i. N "~ ~ b C ,~C U C~ N ~ ~ O O ~ .~C .~ SC ~ ~ ~ ~ > .~ 3 c~ 3 cci 3 p ~ ~ ~ Q c~ aa ~ ~ ~ bA C 3 O 3 w J .~ :~ .^ U y J :c G a ATTACHMENT #3 SITES FOR MAJOR TURF RENOVATIONS Shell 2 Shell 3 Back Creek Garst Mill 2 Hidden Valley 1 Hidden Valley 2 Clearbrook 1 Clearbrook 2 Green Valley Upper Mt. Pleasant 1 Mt. Pleasant 2 Walrond 1 Burlington 1 Burlington 2 RCCC Of these 15 sites, 14 are multiple use sites hosting baseball/ softball and soccer/football. This is the major need for renovation. ATTACHMENT #4 . TENNIS COURT CONDITIONS NAME Vinton Center Mt. Pleasant Northside High Oak Grove Bent Mountain Penn Forest Cave Spring High Clearbrook Garst Mill Gearhart Stonebridge Walrond Glenvar Mt. View Camp Roanoke USAGE REPAIR NO. RATING PRIORITY (1) 2 1 3 4 1 (4) 4 BOND 1 5 2 1 3 2 3 5 3 (4) 5 BOND 1 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 BOND 10 5 5 (4) 4 5 (1) 1 5 1 N/A 44 Q In need of major repairs ATTACHMENT #5 BASKETBALL COURT CONDITIONS PRIORITY ~ COURT RATE Poor 1 Vinton Center P 2 Brookside P 3 Burlington P Fair 4 Fort Lewis F 5 Cave Spring F 6 Craig Center F 7 Willie Martin F 8 Gearhart F 9 Garst Mill F 10 Clearbrook F 11 Back Creek F 12 Gladetown F 13 Masons Cove F Good 14 Mt. View G 15 Occupational School G 16 Oak Grove G 17 Catawba Center G New 18 Sadler N ~'- 1 ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS DIVISION - NORTH MAINTENANCE REGION NORTH REGION Park Maintenance Foreman Red Davis WEST DISTRICT MEO I * Walt Mundy NORTH DISTRICT MEO II Chuck Wilson MEO I Mickey Brizendine Maint. Worker Phil Carper Maint. Worker Tony Grubb Laborer Carolyn Harvey Maint. Worker Robert Brown P/T Laborer Laborer Maint. Worker Charles Swain Cecil Reynolds *Walt Mundy mows Vinyard one day per week WEST DISTRICT STAFFING: 5 Full Time 1 Part-time FIELDS MAINTAINED: 10 Baseball - 4 lighted 5 Softball - 3 lighted 5 Soccer - 0 lighted 2 football - 1 lighted TOTAL: 22 8 LIGHTED TOTAL DISTRICT PARK SITES: 9** TOTAL ACRES: 412.20 ~ P/T Laborer ~ NORTH DISTRICT STAFFING: 4 full-time 1 Part-time FIELDS MAINTAINED: 12 Baseball- 2 lighted 1 Softball- 0 lighted 6 Soccer - 1 lighted 1 Football- 1 lighted TOTAL: 20 4 LIGHTED TOTAL DISTRICT PARK SITES: 1 TOTAL ACRES: 101.80 **The West District marks two fields at Hidden Valley, which is a Southwest District Park. NOTE: P/T LABORERS ARE SEASONAL ONLY, ON AS-NEEDED BASIS. GENERALLY WORK APRIL-SEPT./OCT. 32 HRS/WK Gary Bostic (Maint. Worker) and inmate crew (3) mow 11 sites County-wide: 5 in East District; 7 in West District; 3 in North District; 2 in SW District This position committed to Inmate Program & not included in field maintenance organizational chart ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER /~""` AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, pIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM; Budget Work Session With County Staff COIINTy ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS; gIIMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session with Count staff if time permits. It is likely that the Work Session with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission will last at least one hour. The Board may wish to continue this work session to the nex meeting. t ~~f~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION '- Approved ( ) Motion by: VOTE Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Eddy Referred ( ) Johnson To ( ) Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~` HIGHLIGHTS OF 1994 ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW The following highlights are divided into two parts. PART I (Pages 2-10) provides a brief overview of the more significant amendments proposed by the Commission. PART II (Pages 11-13) presents other zoning ordinance issues that were discussed by the Commission. The Commission did not hold a public hearing or make recommendations on these issues. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED AS A DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S APRIL 12, 1994 WORKSESSION ON THE ZONING ORDINANCE. '~ April 12, 1994 PART I AMENDMENTS PROPOSED Height Limitations in I-1 and I-2 Industrial Districts (Item #21) • The goal is to provide greater consistency between the height restrictions in commercial districts, which is unlimited when not adjoining residential areas, and the industrial districts. • The revisions would establish a maximum height limit when adjoining residentially zoned areas of 45 feet in the I-1 district and 75 feet in the I-2 district. • The amendments also allow for greater heights when additional setbacks are provided (an additional two foot setback for each foot in height) measured from the portion of the structure exceeding the maximum height limit. • Finally, the revisions eliminate all height restrictions in areas that do not adjoin residentially zoned lands (except within the airport clear zone). 2 April 12, 1994 Accessory Apartments (Item # 10) • The purpose of the amendments is to encourage greater flexibility in the design of accessory apartments, while maintaining present safeguards in single family neighborhoods. • The proposed amendments would allow accessory apartments no greater than one half the size of the primary residence, rather than one quarter the size as presently exists. • An absolute maximum size equivalent to a two bedroom apartment (1,000 square feet) is proposed. The minimum size of 300 square feet is retained. • The standards for locating entrances to an accessory apartment are more loosely defined to increase flexibility while retaining the single family character desired for such units. • The amendments do not alter the special use permit requirement in suburban areas, maintaining the public process, and allowing the County latitude in determining appropriateness. The ability to establish conditions on design or occupancy is also retained. 3 April 12, 1994 Special Use Permits for Religious Assembly (Item # 8) • The purpose of the proposed revisions is to reduce the number of special use permits for places of Religious Assembly. • The proposed changes maintain the public process and County discretion to evaluate requests against the following concerns: - Large regional facilities locating in rural areas due primarily to land prices, with potentially significant impacts on the community and public services. - Establishment or major expansions of existing churches on small, densely developed sites within or adjacent to single-family neighborhoods. - Use of limited prime commercial properties for churches rather than for commercial development. • The proposed amendments would require a special use permit for establishing a new place of religious assembly in any of the districts this use is generally allowed. Any concerns with future expansions of development could be addressed as a condition of permit approval. • Any substantial increase in the size of facilities overall would also require approval under the special use permit requirements. Substantial changes are clearly spelled out in the proposed amendments. • These changes would allow the minor additions and expansions to be handled administratively, without the added cost and time required for obtaining the special use permit. 4. April 12, 1994 Weight Limits for Parking in AR and R Districts (Item #16) • The objective of the proposed amendments is to establish a clear definition of the type and size of trucks which are permitted overnight in single family residential areas. • The proposed amendments establish a standard based on distinctions used by truck manufacturers. This standard relies on function, body style or type, and design for load handling capabilities. • The changes would replace the present method of prohibiting truck of or above 7,500 pounds gross weight, regardless of body style or function. This weight limit can be circumvented by registering the vehicle with DMV with a gross weight of 7,499 pounds. • The amendments specifically exempt pick-up body types of all sizes due to the general acceptance and prevalence in the community. Bonafide agricultural vehicles and equipment are also proposed to be exempt. • The amendments add a new provisions that would prohibit construction equipment in residential areas, except during active construction. This is a recurring problem that is not presently addressed. rj April 12, 1994 Family Day Care Home (Item #6 and 121 • The purpose of the amendments is to bring the zoning provisions in line with new state standards that went into effect 1 1 /93. • The changes would increase the number of children allowed in a Family Day Care Home from 9 to 12, and would now exclude children of the provider. • Consistent with state changes, the proposed amendments also allow a Family Day Care Home to be located in the children's home, and not just in the home of the provider. • Zoning provisions would maintain the care of 5 or less children as a home occupation. 6 April 12, 1994 Summer Camps (Item #7) • The purpose of the proposed amendments is to formally recognize summer camps as a permitted use in the rural areas of the County. • The amendments would add a new use type description for summer camps and allow them by right in the AG-3 and AG- 1 districts and with a special use permit in the AR district. • The proposed use and design standards would require a minimum of 10 acres in the AG-3 and AG-1 districts, require activity areas adjoining residences to be screened, and be served by an all weather road. 7 April 12, 1994 Private Roads for Attached Single Family Developments (Item # 11) • The purpose of the amendments is to clarify specifically where private roads are allowed. • The revisions would specifically state that private roads are allowed in townhouse developments, consistent with current and historical practices. • The amendments would also allow attached single family residences (defined as a two unit townhouse under the old ordinance) on private roads in the R-3 and R-4 multi-family residential districts. • The revisions do not alter the requirement that attached single family residences in the R-1 and R-2 districts must have frontage on a publicly owned and maintained road. 8 April 12, 1994 Basic standards for grandfathered mobile home parks (Item # 13) • The purpose of these revisions is to explicitly acknowledge the replacement of manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks as a unique class of nonconforming uses. • The revisions would specifically state that a manufactured home in a preexisting park can be replaced with a new unit. This is consistent with past practices, but could be considered contrary to the provisions for nonconforming uses unless specifically recognized. • The amendments also would establish a minimum setback from the park boundary, along with requirements for anchoring and skirting new manufactured home units. 9 April 12, 1994 Extension of Existing Areas (Item # 27) Encroachments in Residential • The purpose of the proposed revisions is to provide greater administrative flexibility in allowing nonconforming residences in older subdivisions to be expanded. • ,The proposed amendment would allow homes legally built to a lesser setback standard to enlarge their homes based on the existing setback, as long as the width of the current side or rear yard is not further reduced. • This revision would reduce some, but not all, of the side and rear yard variance requests submitted to the BZA from residents in the County's older neighborhoods where setback requirements have been increased. April 12, 1994 PART ~~ OTHER ISSUES EXPLORED Lot sizes in R-1 District (Item #23) • The basic issue explored was reevaluating the minimum lot size in the R-1 district, particularly the 7,200 sq. ft. lot size with public sewer and water. • The R-1 district applies to the vast majority of areas that are already developed as single family residential or areas planned for such development. Any text amendment would apply universally to these areas. • The undeveloped areas that are zoned R-1 vary considerably, from relatively flat acreage parcels with ready access to public sewer and water (e.g. north and east County), to the more rolling to moderately sloped terrain (e.g. southwest County) that might have access to public sewer or water. • Any change in the required lot size in R-1 would penalize areas deemed suitable and desirable for the current minimum lot sizes in order to establish minimum lot sizes sought for other areas of the County. • One major concern was that any change might require two distinct different single family districts to meet the needs of the community. This would require reconsideration of the zoning maps, with substantial map amendments affecting a large portion of the suburban population. • Other related issues were: larger lots consume more land in an area with a limited supply of developable land; issues of affordable housing; and impact on projects in the planning phases. 1 1 April 12, 1994 Create an Exclusive Agricultural and Forest Zoning District (Item #24) • The basic issue discussed was the creation of an exclusive agricultural and forest district. • It was the consensus of the Commission that while such a district could be drafted, until its application was discussed in greater detail, such a district might not fit the needs of the community. • Other districts intended, in part, to protect agricultural and forest resources, and open space are scheduled for preparation in 1994, including the cluster overlay district and Blue Ridge Parkway Overlay District. • An exclusive district that prohibits non-farm single family residences has limited legal foundation in Planning and Zoning law in Virginia. 1 2 April 12, 1994 Reconsider Road Frontage Requirements for Lots in Agricultural Districts (Item #25) • The issue considered was reducing the required road frontage for new lots in Agricultural Districts. • The minimum frontage currently required on a public road is 200 ft. in the AG-3 district and 150 ft. in the AG-1 district. • The areas this requirement applies are designated Rural Preserve in the County Comprehensive Plan. Based on the Plan, growth is to be discouraged in these areas. • The frontage requirement, along with the minimum lot size, were set to discourage growth. It was felt that lot size alone would not limit growth, particularly larger subdivision activity involving new roads. • The frontages were also set to provide greater separation of driveway entrances along rural roads. Greater frontages also give VDOT (who must grant access to individual lots) greater flexibility to site a driveway with adequate sight distance. 13 April 12, 1994 O~ ROAN ~~ a >; ~ p z c> ~ 2 ~ ,a, 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Apri120, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Father Kennefh Stofft Our Lady of Nazareth 2505 Electric Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Father Stofft: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution, Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. Sincer ly, ~~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P C~o~xz~#g o~ ~.o~~xxta~te P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 ® Regded Paper O~ POANp,I.~ a ~ ~ z Z ~ .a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. SOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NIGKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. John D. 8907 Potts Covington, Cross Creek Road VA 24426 Dear Mr. Cross: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Roanoke Valley Prisoners of War (POW) Chapter for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 21, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ..y ~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc• Commissioner of the Revenue C~~~xx~#~ ~#' ~~~x~~~~ • Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®RP~r O~ ROANp~.~ a ti ~ A z z ~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~o~z~#~ ~f ~ o~xx~.o C~.e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Patricia Buck 3622 Brandywine Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Buck: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Delta Kappa Sorority of Epsilon Sigma Alpha for a 50/50 raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on September 5, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYDECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATIONPLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, vr~~ ~d . G2.u..~,~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®R~~ P~ O~ ROANp,~.~ ti ~ ~ z ~ a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. G. William Stacey, IV 430 Willow Oak Drive Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Mr. Stacey: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the North Cross School for a raffle permit. The raffles will be conducted on May 5 and 7, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCL4L REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ~' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®Recyaed P~ ~ ROANp,~~ ~ A z ~ a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. James Skinner 5633 Legate Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Skinner: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag Club) for a raffle permit. The raffles will be conducted on June 4 and 5, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYDECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, J~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bj h Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney C~~~xx~#~ ~~ ~o~xx~~~~ County Treasurer ®Recyaaa Paper OF POANp,I.~ ~ A z Z v a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Johnny Starkey P. O. Box 51 Catawba, VA 24070 Dear Mr. Starkey: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Catawba Valley Ruritan Club for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 28, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, J'~ • C.~G~~- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney (2~.a~tz~#~ ~# ~~~xxt~~~ County Treasurer ®Racyaad Pier O~ ROANp~~ z~ J az 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX GAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Mary Stuart Link 2201 Carolina Avenue Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Ms. Link: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Star Quilters Guild for a raffle permit for calendar year 1994. The raffles will be conducted on July 11, and December 5, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YO U MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, .~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney (~~ixx~#~ n#' ~~~trt~~~ County Treasurer ®R aed Paper O~ AOAN0,1-~G iL? z °v r a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Robert Testerman 1784 Melissa Circle Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Testerman: on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, the Roanoke At their regular meeting roved the request of the County Board of Supervisors unanimously aPP ermit for calendar Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 for a 50/50 raffle p year 1994. The raffles will be conducted weekly during 1994 as described in the application. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be You may displayed on the premises where the raffle i ertmoits be nissued ~ on a State Code provides that raffle and bingo p calendar-year basis and suchhpWrme~s issueod ly 1 val id r on nthe edate 31, 1994. This Pe~ ation. specified in your app PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR- PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DEXPI~ UN DECEMBER 3I~OF EACH CALENDAR~YEAR~ R RAFFLES. PERMITS If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, T Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®R~a~a P>~ C~~ixx~~~ a~ ~~~x~~~e P O~ p,OAN KF G .p ~~ z z v ,~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~ixrt~~ of ~.~~xrt~~~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 April 19, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Howard E. Muser, Chairperson Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Musser: Attached is a copy of Board Action A-41294-5 authorizing the adoption of the Cable Televibiotheugoardf of Supervisors at9their This resolution was AdrPl e12 , 1994 . meeting on Tuesday, p If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council ®R«,yel.a ~ ~:~- . M~. ~ p Yr.. ~ f ~ ~ } tr€..i ~~, .~ Ef ~- / ~i ,,~ ! Y k ,, \ s/ ~ ///// ION V ` ~: ,A ,. WILL FAX TO YOU ---_ v ~- YOUR CALL Q RE(URNEO C ,nC:L MESSAGE Y-~I/~,(,~~.C~- i ~'=~ ~~~ ~ A ~~~c'~7 In SIGNED ~ ~ !"" M 4008 A TOPS ~ L~HRO ~N April 14, 1994 Brenda: ECH says this man wants 5 copies of the cat ordinance: Roy Butler 6932 Campbell Drive I Salem 24153 V MH ,,-- ^ ~~ ;~~<~~ '~ r r ~ ~~ C~ a Number: 359744 Text: 231907 Posted: 03/09/94 07:43 Type: Regular Message Received: Subject: Resolution From: MHA - Mary Allen To: DAL - Art Laprade We will be glad to do a proclamation for Telecommunicators Week. The Board meeting is Tuesday, April 13 at 3 p.m. We can use info from previous resolutions. Please let me know closer to the April 13 date who will be present to accept the proclamation. Number: 359460 Text: 231673 Received• 03/09/94 07:40 Type: Regular Message Subject: Resolution From: DAL - Art Laprade To: MHA - Mary Allen Guess it is that time of year again. The week of April 10-16, 1994, is National Telecommunicators Week. Can we get the Board to do their recognition or resolution for our communications officers as they have done previously? Could it be done if the Board meets on April 12? If you need any more info., please let me know. Thanks. C-~-~-~, ~'~~ G~ C. ~ ~~~ ~i ~ a~~ ~,~~~ ~w ~ +ti~ .. 't ~~sd ,~.~~~ •aouEUip.zo szu~ 1Cq pazi.zou~n~ uoi~eoi3issEto buzuoz ut abu2uo auk ~oaT3a.z o~ deui ~oi.z~sip buiuoz auk puauze o~ pa~oa.ztp /`7 ^ ~ M E M O R A N D U M TO: Members of the oard of Supervisors ~; FROM: Don Myers DATE: March 22, 1994 RE: Regional Enforcement of Decal Ordinances - Update Several meetings of representatives from he City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and Roano a County have been held for the purpose of developing an agree ent for regional enforcement of decal ordinances. The most rec t meeting was on March 16, and there was concurrence among the ttenders that we should attempt to have the agreement and the ne essary ordinances in effect prior to the next decal deadline. Joe Obenshain, Senior Assistant County At Forney, has drafted a model ordinance and a model agreement. Repre entatives from each jurisdiction plan to take the agreemen cessary ordinance revisions to their respective gover ng bodies in ril. In our case, the first reading would be hel on April 12, a the second on April 26. If the agreement is ado ed, a meetin will be held to provide an update to the respective ~ Attorneys and the appropriate General District Court judges. It was agreed that a joint press release would be issued in the first week of April to announce the proposal. Anne Marie Green will work with her counterpart in the City of Roanoke to arrange the release. The proposed effective date of the agreement is June 1, and enforcement would begin on June 15. cc: Fred Anderson, Treasurer John Cease, Chief of Police Wayne Compton, Commissioner of the Revenue Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Joe Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Administrator O~ AOANp~~ G ti ~ ~ z z ~ ,a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 1, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Father Kenneth Stofft Our Lady of Nazareth 2505 Electric Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Father Stofft: This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of today. Thank you for agreeing to present the invocation at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, at 3:00 p.m. As we discussed, the Roanoke County Administration Center has moved from Brambleton Avenue to 5204 Bernard Drive, which was the old "Travelers Building", located directly behind Shoney's off Rt. 419. The Board Meeting room is on the first floor and visitors' parking is in front of the building. I appreciate very much your willingness to be with us on April 12th. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 772- 2005. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors C~~ixx~#~ ~~ ~a~x~~~~ ®Recyaaa Pam ,~_ZZ-qy Roanoke County Budget Calendar FY 1994 - 1995 9/17/93 12/6/93 1 /7/94 1 /10/94 1/25/94 2/4/94 CIP Packets distributed to department heads. CIP Review Committee begins review of submitted projects. Board of Supervisors planning retreat. Budget kick-off and "Budget Teams" organization. Departments receive targets. Budget worksession -revenues, expenditure summary. Department budgets due to Budget Department. 2/7 - 3/4/94 Budget Team Meetings: Prioritized Addbacks Present Individual Budgets Discuss Funding Issues 218/94 Budget worksession -Mid-year expenditures report. 2122/94 Public Hearing: Tax rates and Tax Assessment increase (101 %). 3!8/94 Adoption of Tax Rates, public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget. 3/15/94 - 3/17/94 DepartmentallTeam budget hearings with County Administrator. 3/22/94 Budget worksession: Vehicle Inventory, Expenditure Review, State Revenue Summary. 4/5/94 Special meeting -joint budget worksession with the School Board; County Expenditures. 4/12/94 Volunteer Rescue and -Fire Chiefs budget worksession; Revenue Review, CIP Draft. 4/26/94 Budget worksession, Public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget. 5/10/94 Budget Worksession: Expenditures and CIP discussion. 5/24/94 Adoption, first reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Adoption of CIP. 6/14/94 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. 1-1 Beverly Abbott 518 Sweetfern Dr NW N,~aj~t~.;ke . VA . 24019- H=~h'~-282b W=982-3389 `-~ - _ y ~-`'- B . Barton =;r=,> 1 ~"edar Lane Roanoke, VA. 98~+-449 *;;~Y;~ara Bowler Rt3 Box271A 'Yi't?ITi. VA, ,;40~t!- 1 ~. ^il ~) '3h5-7 712 ~ur.~ce Br°rtr.eman t-j _. '- J~.1F.1 J~ 1 L ~ ~ i-i Tr.^ ~~ ,. ~. .~f - ~4(~ 1%- i'72-081 N 4207 Srtarv~ onlyn Dr . S Roanoke. VA. 24018- a8g-~4[i2 ~/~~f~obin Bailey W. %t1 Bra:=.~2'i~:~Hi~1den Fs?r'e°t L'~- Goodview. VA. 34095- 890-0410 1 r{(~ ~ ',r¢enmont c~'t N . F Roan~~i<:e . V.'v. Q"'7-7~=i7~~i a r !i `? r ::1 ±=', nTN~i'i f-~ n lRr. 4 B c} :~:7 1 ili 1-'t,_, r k•/ 1v10'a j-I r.. V !'~ . J`Y.i ~~ 1- (-~ - - _ _ _ - ~- . L,V, , Rt 8~_ ..a:.~ J r. ._'-t ~~ ...._.. - ~r,~ni'~ (~rnSSFlrtlrt' ~?"~ Tt:rner Rd. :. ::=t ~ m . i1 A . u,41~ ~,- ~}.d•y Dufi°11e - y.: t 977-0039 - - r'Clra F-"'"r,~r~rrln !zr :3 Bo::107 Br oo}.mont rt.~la=•ki. VA. 2L~f''-- ~;rr i ~ 1 e ~o~ p~ :5 5 Rd . R n.~ ~ A . ?' 1 - : 4- '_ 0 Nina J. Hill 2521 Dorchester Dr Roanoke, VA. :'4C~"13- r,i=-~'FyyS ~'~1= -- _ _.. Rte-+~tF' '=~rc'le ~4i_ ~~~._f,,~~55, ;~i,~tr.~ e ~+~~i _ 1r f~.rrt~,.. R~:. Art#.~ 38%- 1. r, y~ r~ Li^~rya Fi~d1°r Lvt C a t:1 r~7Tr7 ~ tl t L? a n ~: 41 '7 r-i - ~;1r1=jai-d Br 'j-1r, !{L1 ~vxlo Fl~alne Boyd ~~ '~` _:n`~ R1 ~7 'n 1ij4~, r*~Y-r_.t c c ~ r.__ , Fj~rcr ~nt;nt-sir.. VA . y.!11_f r V- __i_i~- , .` :-i _; ~, - _ iti 1 -- rn --. _ '-I riF-' _ _ _ _ __ _. __ i•..~ ;alert .;ri~; :~.--- ~ - -,~;,-,-~;,, VA. _ .1 . _ - N:--ii_i-~ ~=1 1~ =t,-j c,'•.• i.' h Ll Far 2'' 1 ~, tif,~ %~ +`,1:~ '~anor "r. N.E. f ~;~~_ ~4_,. _ ~:,t_t is ~ i?~:_~rdon X04 Tt~rner Rca . VA. ~alerr.. CIA. 3 41 , ~; it1~±y ~~_~. ~ 1._ J~~ ':;alit E,'f' Rd ~I .T~. ROanok:~ . VA . 3p"~_r?i41 Lircda t-ioc~an 8358 T~n1i 1 lowridge Rd Roanor:e . VA . v4~_~1. - '_, r, ~,- -' ~'_ i it _ ~• Fa 1 j~~r; l71- i1n;,~n riall. ~;;. 711 irj- 1 (70.x) 57b-369b h:o r l.i Ror=,per 4035 Wc~~ndr i da_ e Dr . Roanoke, VA. ~~:_~ ~'- 7'~ ~'-' 744 ~. ?~eiores Jones Nancy K. Karnes ,~ `~l 2-1 ~~ ~, t. r e am t: ' c~! i 1r t. .3 U 3 F ~/~~ , c 7 i ~.~r7a'_.j Rt1 . ~ . E r~adf<,r<~. VP.. ROdrl~Jk:r, VA, .;1.1x1_ 2~014- ~n3-n39-3350 or 639-3298 427-147 ~a. 1- r f y .- i. ~. z n ~_i _ F'f1 P,,.,. '~(Ir;r;.~ r~9h~; Leslie Lane - :: ~- . ~,~, 1T~t.~~,~hY3~ `v1nt~~n, VA. ;,r;r,:~ tl_lart ~inl~: ~~(''~ i (-,a1^n1 Ina Av!' . y,_. 'l l i ,~ TJf 1 1 1 e r ti 11-1+ Or'i , ~i u , .1 Cil l-=i ~ ~ ~. .~ h 1 j, ~ r ~ r 1 ;i.71 d rl ~.. ~ 2,' (• ~ •~• .~~~~i..r_- '.. ii .. ~'=i1.?a l~, ~, n r, :~ r a , ti A . .~~i_.~- i03-~~7-821b ivl;ar-v PLebles 5 ~; ? ~! Chl~.kar Dr . 24018- Jane Pritts ~~? 1<~ H1_u~ters Roanoke. VA. 24G1~- ;44-x'484 H rl l-1 i e ,J : f e e 71 ~~~ %; u e R i ,a,~ Y r~;~-tnol~:? . tiA . .ct~i1?- 'a j"'-r ~~.~ ~3ecJcv ltea 6~~1 Back Creek Rd. 24065- 1 (7i~3) %%4-1651 Rita Lanier ~51'_~ l-~anks ~' . Sa:err>, ~~A. ~~ ~~ _ jS=~`-- i i~h,~ _ r Lu.~_~_ 1 le L~.ylJ B 1 ~.~~.1 . :~ 0 ~:~~ h Mead L i r_. k Rd . 1~OanOKe, VA. ? ~lil i ~i - `•i~ima ~?a~~iieid r~ ::i ...J N 1 n P t 1' f~ e~ f~;=i 1-I Y ?, r,rj-ir~h` rl~nll.~r:~ri 1 ri r '' i .-1 . r._ _ ~ilE'°~irher Rt i . Boy; X88 ~.~., , `,,i ;j , _-~ -.:{~ - - - .; :~ '~ J H .t -- 'ter-s`ir - F•.'. _ _ _ -fit : i-i. __ ,~,'~~,-;~r'~ 8 _i F' i •.,~Pr ~=reek R~~ . i"~ 1. 1:. T ~. ~.` A . i ~ L~ - 1 t 703 ? i21-601 Elaine Recede Rd ~~ 1!513 Bottom Creek Rd Bent Mtn. VA. ">405'?- 92~-4::18 ~l"111_ '~_ _ltint!~;=!~?11 in() MOrali AVe . ,_t lurr1, VA . 24153- i~?- jKl'~~J Jessica Smith 1712 :Earl Dr Salem. VA. -~,'ihi.~ ~'alt~ i!t7 -~rr_: fit?""Fvt. :lc1:Q1- _..~ ~ r t _ _. __t ~_~. ~- ~a0 ! ~i- ~ail1P POWerS 1GC'~1 Br~~shy Mo1_>.ntain ll.-', :~alem. VA. .. ~ ~ v :i89-3827 LI_lc~•i Ricardo :± . 1 . Box 444 ~~a 1 1 awa~% . ~; ~ . 2~1~~r,7- ,i,~~~-4s~3-1i;~39 ~~ i ~_L~; i `~ lkaCf i~~ r T~ F: lJ C'i 1 .`_, t.," t.± U 1 ? is 1 1 + i. _, .a^_'.. L) Y ~ t 5`~,~ R<~anake . ~JA . Patricia Snc'ir~adzky Irene Strickler 4108 r11~ rarst Mill F.d.S.W 331+ Crittendon Ave. N.W. i:~~arlOke . VA . - . ~2aij1S- 240i2- ~~-jiff iii `~?t' .-r_ltil'+ glary June Thampsan Lilly Tilley i~li ldrrd Tanner t 1i1-~6 Hi~~]--iand Rd. 31.56 Oakda 1 e Fcaad X06 Turner Rr_l . Ap ~ 1 Salem. VA. Salem. VA. Raanoke, VA. X4153-2304 '413 24018- -~ _~8u--~ 1J4 X89-138U :74-~~3G-1 a:3rT~ Tribley Barbara VanDvke Port. i a Tomlinson Rr . 1 . Boar ~; r i'i _t n i.,'r 1 i7 vi y n n r ~ T ^~ ~ Q ;w ;^ ` j .? ~r 11 ~ "F G;„ ~n iNa~nn!'r !,inr'~ TAI~?2jr?ri 11 ~ n d7 B1Vd. !i js~.i-; ivi,.~r~d~Ildd -`~31.~ _ i T~ _; Y :l r_4 Y 1/ ~ t-;;-tat-i n 1; LJ .`~ - .. ... ` ~1 1 ~ !a- - 7C1GQ ~~. ~~li~ _~~._-~ 'rare='a ;' Wi 1 1 i ams .:a z~. ~tii 1 _ i•arr.= - _ ~ 1, _,~ ,,r-,:inc, L,~t<<~~-I, ~:-+r1`_ :: ~. ~ Y ~ ?, ~l ~ r: i :ct . ?~` ~ BOX :: ., ;1 '- ~-~;~nr3r' _, i`li~. ;=ifi~;}rte :~ ?~- -;q;-~ ~~b '.. ... ,~ , ~ ~ y jam.. m-4 ~-';^~ -; I~ 1 ~~ ? y 41.. ~r1 v n r: }, ; t + i ,_ n Y -, , c-1": _ ~ ~ , ~' ~/~~7%y` / .l T UT_ ~~ . . Minor 3Pnt Carol Clap u4~! Red ianP Boni ?rake ~ 3ox 1249 `~ 1839 Forth ltd. 3a1e~, VA ` . Saipm V~~ ~aletn, VA 24I 3- 24~ 5~' 24153- ?89-9743 J~2_~.yl~ 349-5849 Jy~Zyr ;~ec'cYr J~Ann l:ling 7 ~ P .td. 1547 Coral Rid ::arQn OLichwier ~7C~7 ~'airburn fir. ~•i1' Rt. ~', Box X36 , Roanoke VA ~,oanoke, VA 24013- 24121- 9~~-7924 ~Q9-14a1 2g7_7h37 ~QLen J. Alba ;'arie r . Schmi tz 1119 Oakwood fir. S.~+d. 775 ParaQan Av~~. oanoke VA 8a1~.m, VA 2 4015- ~ 24I53- 344-5529 339-5723 By-i.aws Revision ARTICLE I -Name The name of the organization shall be the Star C~ilters Guild ARTICLE II -Purpose The purpose of this organization shall be ~D promote good fellowship and interchange of ideas among those engaged or interested in the art and craft of quilting; to stimulate interest in the cormxanity; to make quilts for donation to charitable organizations; and to promote the knowledge and understanding of all aspects of quilting through education, sharing, enJoying and appreciating other's work. ARTICLE III -Membership, Voting [quorum Any individual, regardless of race, creed, color, sex or national origin, who is interested in furthering the purpose of this organization, may become a member upon payment of dues, as required by the By-Laws. 1. Arxxaal doss shall be recamiended by the Executive Board and shall be payable by the January meeting. 2. New members shall be accepted monthly. Those joining from June 1 through Deoernber 31 shall pay half the yearly dies. 3. Renewing members always pay full dies. 4. Visitors are welcome at monthly meetings; however, an individual may visit only twice per year. 5.A11 members in good standing shall have a vote on the business matters requiring a vote. Majority of members present at a given meeting shall corwtitute a quorum. ARTICLE IV -Meetings i. Regular meetings shall be held on the first Monday of each month except on those Mondays that fall on a holiday. In that case the meetings will be held the second Monday. Special meetings may be called by the President or the Executive Board. 2. The Guild sponsors workshops and other events for Guild members. These workshops may be open to the public at the discretion of the Executive Board. 3. Dates of general membership meeti~, workshops, program topics, the quilt show and the Execrative Board will be published in the Guild newsletter. 4. Norrnember speakers fees, mileage and honorarium will be set and updated at the budget proposal meeting by those officers and board members present. ARTICt~ V -Officers 1. The officers of the Guild shall be: President Vice President 3. A majority of the Executive Board shall constitute a quorum and a majority of those present shall determine all matters brought before the meetings of the Board. 4. The Exeoutive Board shall meet at least four times a year. AFTICLE VII -Standing and Spacial Committees i. Chairmen of standing and special camniLtees shall be appointed by the President. Their tenure shall terminate with the installation of a new president, with the exception of the Quilt Show Chairman. 2. All carrmittess shall. cor~ist of a chairman and at least three members at large with the exception of the Historian/Durator. 3. The Workshop Committee shall be responsible for obtaining, sd-ieduling and introducing all workshops and shall present to the Board a comprehensive format For the next calendar year. Workshops shall be held at least four times a year. 4. The program Committee shall be responsible for scheduling programs for the regular meeting from January through November. The Committee shall be appointed no later than October of the preceding year. The Committee is also responsible for obtaining, scheduling and introducing the programs at each reg~:lar monthly meeting, with the exception of December. The outgoing chairman will assist the next chairman. 5. The ~~iewsletter Committee of the Guild shall preparF~ a newsletter to be distributed to the membership the first week of January, April, July, and October. b. The Publicity ComnittESe is responsible for all Guild publicity, including notification of media of events of interest to the cormxanity, design and distribution of any posters as~d flyQrs rc~iired to publicize Guild events, and maintenance of a mailing list of otter guilds and organizations that might be interested in build events. 7', The Membership Committee shall be responsible for actively seeking new members. The ccxrmittee shall also be responsible for publishing the Guild Yearbook that is to be distributed to members in JarK.xary. 8. Tf~e Hospitality Carm-ittee shall introduce and register guests at each rating; shall present each guest or guest speaker with a favor; and shall be resp+~nsible for the organization of the anrual Christmas party. 9. The Historian/Curator shall maintain a scrap book containing all newspaper articles and other items ~rtaining to tt-~e Guild. She shall also update our photo collection of programs and activities. 1O. The Nominating Cannitt~e shall ~ appointed by the President. The appointment shall be at least two months before the election of officers. The committee shall chc:~~e one member among themE,elves to act as chairman. The committee shall submit a slate of officers and make their report at the Septsmaber meeting. Additional nomirkation~ from the fla,~-- may be made, providing that the consent of the nominee has been sE~cured. Voting shall b® at Cn'rAl'~r;n vn1,I~F'Y RuRl'rnN cLU}3 ~) yy/, hl E', I.1RII~,;11 LP R0S`I'1?R Bearc],Jaclc 6197 Blacksburg 17oad Cal~awl~a, VA 240'70 H-384-6`'i'11 Bolton,Percy 5010 Bl.acksburt~ Rc,ad 1 ~ tr (1 ? /~ t " c, i'r~uc~~ ~ , H-992-2161 Bra.nscomb,Gl.en 8819 N~a:l,c)rt Roatl Ca l,a wl)a . VA X4070 Bt'izencline,Lew:is 1'.. 4'1`3 Bradshaw Rvati S:za eln, vn 2 41 5"~ 11-3gi-OCt'/ 7 C la:;be~y,Crir1 W. I?o!tl,e 2,}?ox X3/61 7 ,T t' () LI t '~/ ~. 1 ~ f'. , V n 1 /4 I r( 1 H-''92-2310 1}rewr,y,aames W.,Jr 5236 P1'.,. `.('~ bor Road E?f Zc}cshttr~;, Vn 24.060 H- 552- 1 1,'71 ('atat•)1)rt VA 24070 ii-38/ -f~,>1 Fakit3,('c~rclon S. 4049 (;a t.a4!i~a ('reek Rnad ca.tawl:ct, tJn ~1}0'/0 H-381.-63`>5 Eanes,Ri]1 1/,11, ('.;~3.1n:: I)ri_ve,N.1?. Ro:,rl<,l~r,, vn ~/,ul'/ t;arnan,C;lovi.s 8.?1 h f3l.aolcst)urg Road Ca r,awba, vn 24070 1I-384-v56/, (;arulan,Fra3lkic' 8/, {0 Cravel H i.l. l Rostd t;;rua tliu,lda,yne rtal,awba, Un 14f170 II- 1"4-E,S07 I1a11,(11a,y 5931 C;ai.tt4lba Valley Cnl„twha., VA 24070 Ilr,It;? L~~,y,J;tmt~;.(Jim) 16 I).IFtCk9b111')' Rt,atl ~,a tawh-~~ , Vn 14070 }i-38/,-6319 Hi.11,Fletcher 383q Shawne~~ Traci ). }1-384-6?~t'l Lee,Pal3ner W• Route 2,Box 352 'froutvil7.e,VA 24175 H-992-1877 Mrtrs}3,R.Mi.cl3ae]_,Jr 2930 Colt Colony Drive ~alem,Vn X4153 H-389-305~~ Martin, fi.m Cni,awha,VA 24i170 11-384-E~~1' (, Mchaniel,RoberL Dri ve 991+~ f•ril:awba Road Tr?ut,vi ] 1.e,VA 24175 II-t19?-20 /, ~ 26?3 Syc tmoro ltri ve SalF'.In,Uri 415.3 H-384-7~ :~5 MoorF,J~ ;,es A: 2(133 SY~''.more hri ve Salenl,VA 241~i3 II-384-61 '?6 Karst,F'r~tnlc 66()9 I31acl;sburg Rcad c:t I,~itJl,a , vA >4070 !1- jf;l,-6001, ICel1;~,Richard(But,c}t) 856/, Ct•avel II i. Il Road Ca tawl)a., Vn 7_4070 11._384-7429 ICoI; .nke, Pad (,'?1 ; I;rn,l:;liclt•t Itc,n~l Il-. ;~3/,-8ul 3 Moore,Hot3at'd KellE. ,y ~~ 4676 Carr `.ns Cove -''.oa Sal.em,VA '4153 II-384-698`'• Orr,Kettne , h Eugene Box 24 24070 Catawba„VA 1{-381,-6:354 Rathhur!• +I'~t `Y'y U' 6'i6 i I;l~.:~k;. u3.1', Ru,+c! C., t~tt.,ba , vn '4c~'/u }1-384-E'~~ 1'7 layer, i)c::Lber t J . Rebli nE[f '11 ;, 11i,'m 5110 I31ar.ksburg Road I,aymr3n,ftub?ri, H. 6164 ple3;l:)ort ''.oad Cataw!)a, vn 14(1'70 6035 Al,oll.o l)ri.ve,N•W. Catawba .t, A 2/;' )0 II_384..~~y~i,3 Rortnoke, Vn 14019 H-5h1-01 2y II-384 -6 ~{ 3 ' Saul,F.Robert,Jr. 6665 Blacksburg Road Catawba.,VA 24070 H-384-6510 Sennst,rom,Robert 4709 Carvins Cove Salem,VA 24153 H-38/}-7129 Shelton,Phil P.O.Box 282 Catawba,VA 24070 H-384-6404 Willey,Johrt D. 6332 Newport Road Catawba,VA 24070 }i-384-7714 L. Wingate,Harold C. Road Route 2,Box 27,5 Troutvi.lle, VA 24175 Ii_992-2107 Shine.ul_~t,David 57_94 Catawba Creek Ruud Catawba,VF. 2/,070 H-381,-6461 Snlith,Sherril.l L. 3201 Go7_f Co7_ony Drive Salem,'VA 24153 H-387-9108 Starkey' ,Johnny P.O.Box 51 Catawba,VA 24070 H-381E-65 58 Starkey,Lar.ry G. 11562 Catawba Road Troutville,VA 21,.175 H-992-/+316 Thomas,Claude 6313 CA+-a~rba Creek Road ,.rte„+•-'. "!.1.e,Vr1 2/{1 75 H-384-E~ 1 58 ,VanRips~r,Timothy E. 5839 Catawba Valley Lirive Cat,awl7a,VA 24070 H-384-6709 Vinson,Andrew J. 5450 Catawba Hospital Road Catawba,VA 24070 H-38/i-6260 Business Address P.O.Box 6014 Roanoke,VA 24017 '~1-986-0420 Wingai;e,Kevin P.O.Box 134 Catawba,VA 24070 H-384-7252 Wittgate,Mic}iael E. 4925 Catawba Creek Road Catawba,VA 24070 H-384-7782 P,'oodby, Carmon 3856 Shawnee Trail Salem,VA 24153 H-384-6941 ,P1.~,x- ok 5/_ S-9y r ~_ C ~ uGROANO%E COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~Ro y~ a I w~'V g~j~ , AGENDA b~~yp~ ~ .,,,r'f APRIL 12,1994 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NOW MEETS AT THE NEW ADMINISTRATION CENTER AT 5204 BEIi1yARD DRIVE. S.W. THE MEETING ROOM IS LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supemsors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE AN EVENING SESSION ON APRIL 12 FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUDGET WORK SESSIONS. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the C-erk to the Board at (703) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Irnocation: The Reverend Kenneth Stofft Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring the Week of April 10 - 16, 1994 as Telecommunicators Week. 2. Resolution of Appreciation to Harold Richardson for his Services to Roanoke County. 3. Proclamation Declaring the Week of April 17 - 23 as National Volunteer Week. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of Lease Purchase of Energy Management Program for the County Schools. (Homer Duff, School Director of Facilities and Operations) 2. Request to Accept Funds from the Compensation Board for a Corrections Officer Position. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) 3. Request for Acceptance of Funds from the Compensation Board to Purchase Personal Computers. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) 4. Request for Approval to Remove the Cap on the Sherifps Subfund. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) 5. Request for Use of Public Private Partnership Funds for the Archery Shooter's Association World Championship. (Timothy Gubala, Economic Development Director) 2 E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending Code for Regional Enforcement of Decal ~ .. ~~ ~;~.,2 ,~..- 2. Ordinance Vacating a 15 Foot Drainage Easement as Shown on Lots 6, 7, and 8, Located on Elbert Drive, Block 1, Section 1 of Sugarloaf Highlands in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District Upon the Petition of Walter J. and Sue G. Baumoel. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections of Article II, Dogs, Cats, and Other Animals, of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl of the Roanoke County Code to Require Licensure of Cats, to Prohibit Unvaccinated Dogs and Cats from Running at Large, to Limit the Number of Cats per Dwelling Unit, to Provide for a Three Year License Tax for Dogs and Cats, to Increase the Board Fee for Impounded Animals, and to Define Certain Acts Committed by Animals as Nuisances and Prescribing Penalties Therefore. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1994) 3 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Access and Environmental Clean-Up Easement from Layton DeThomas and Sandra H. Thomas in Connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) I. J. APPOINTMENTS CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII~L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994, March 22, 1994. 2. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Roanoke Valley Prisoners of War Chapter. 3. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Star Quitters Guild. 4. Request for Approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Delta Kappa Sorority of Epsilon Sigma Alpha. 5. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the North Cross School. 6. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Sweet Virginia Breeze (Roanoke Valley Shag Club) 4 7. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Catawba Valley Ruritan Club. 8. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.19 Miles of Arabian Lane into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 9. Approval of Resolution Supporting Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. (RADAR) in Their Application for Section 18 Monies for Transportation in Rural Areas. 10. Request for Apprav a 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Vinton Moose Lod 12 K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' C011~IlVIENTS AND COMMiJNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman N. WORK SESSION 1. Changes to the Zoning Ordinance 5 O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A. P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 p.m.1 Q. WORK SESSIONS 1. Budget Work Session with Volunteer Fire & Rescue Chiefs 2. Joint Work Sessiop~ With Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee 3. Budget Work Session with County Staff A. Z.sO ~ 8 . -:etc---.b ,~i ~ SE'c ~~ ~' c~ T. ADJOURNMENT ~ . ~~ , ~ ~ ~~' !e S .-~ ~-- ~--~~ _ l ~ D ~ L. t-yL /L.~ i L_'? ~~ 6 Number: 368279 Text: 236495 Type: Regular Message Subject: Volunteer Week From: MHA - Mary Allen To: TCF - Tommy Fuqua Posted: 04/04/94 16:22 Received: Tommy: ECH woulunteer Weekoandphaveaaavolunteerhfirerandlvolunteererescue for National Vol chief accept the proclamation. Do you think you could get someone to come at 3 p.m. to accept the proclamation? Also, how many fire and rescue volunteers do we have now and how much $$$ do they save the taxpayers (approximately). Thanks for any help you can give me. Brenda: We need to do a Proclamation for Telecommunicator's Week for the April 12 meeting. Just pull out some of the previous years and combine into one. I think we use the same one every year. Mary 4/4/94 m= c~' u~ a~-~.-4 ~,p ~Q,,,~ sa ~y C~ ~i.i F ,aRt 4~ ~° u~- ~(°~`„ J qz fYo. y~ ~~ ~ ~ ~2 IATION TO THE PUBLIC iAFET17DI1993CHER8 PROCLAMATION OF COUNTY AND DECLARING APRIL OF ROp,NORE AS PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS ~~' are responsible for g the Public Safety Dispatchers of Roanoke County atched; WHERFA , ro erl disp ails for assistance are promptly answered and p P Y ensuring that all c and ency medical services personnel would be WHEREAS, the police, fire and emerg Dispatchers; and their duties without the work of the Public Safety c services unable to perform e public Safety Dispatchers also perform non-emergen WHEREAS, th hway safety and the work un ,such as those related to utility operations, hig for the Co tY decal, state, and local government agencies; and of fe hall types of emergency WHERFJIS, the Public Safety Dispatchers work throng rds often having to neglect their own homes and situations, including floods and bl~ua ~ rotected; and of Roanoke County citizens is p families to ensure that the safety - 17, 1993 has been designated as National WHEREAS, the week of Apr-1 11 rs Week to honor and recognize the vital contributions Public Safety Tetecommun~cato and well-being of all citizens. made by the Public Safety Dispatchers to the safety Board of E BE R pRpC1AiMED, that the Roanoke County NOW, THEREFOR , e ress its behalf and on behalf of its citizens, does hereby ~ .and Supervisors, on its own Dispatchers, ciation for the services provided by the Public Safety deeper appre declare the week of April 11 - FU~El4, the Board of Supervisors does hereby TEtFCOMMUNICATORS WEEK in Roanoke County. 17, 1993 as PUBLIC SAFETY C 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H ON TUESDAY,O APRIL 14,E 1992DMINISTRATION CENTER PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS OF ROANORE COUNTY AND DECLARING APRIL 12 - 18, 1992 AS PIIBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEER WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers of Roanoke County daily serve our citizens by answering their telephone calls for police, fire and emergency medical services and by dispatching the appropriate assistance as quickly as possible; and WHEREAS, the critical functions performed by the Public Safety Dispatchers also include those related to utility operations, highway safety and other non-emergency activities, and many other operations performed by federal, state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers often work long, hard hours without recognition by the citizens, yet they provide a critical service needed by all citizens; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers work to improve the emergency response capabilities of these communications systems through their leadership and participation in training programs and other activities; and WHEREAS, the week of April 12 - 18, 1992, has been designated as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week to honor and recognize the vital contributions made by the Public Safety Dispatchers to the safety and well-being of all citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of its citizens, does hereby express its deepest appreciation for the C-3 services provided by the Public Safety Dispatchers; and FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the week of April 12 - 18, 1992, as PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEER in Roanoke County, Virginia. ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1990 PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS OF ROANORE COUNTY AND DECLARING APRIL 8 - 14, 1990, AS PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEER WHEREAS, the Public Safety Dispatchers of Roanoke County daily serve our citizens in a dedicated and professional manner, always striving to improve the emergency response capabilities of the communications system; and WHEREAS, these Public Safety Dispatchers often work long, hard hours without recognition by the citizens, yet they provide a critical service needed by all citizens; and WHEREAS, these professionals need and deserve the informed support of all citizens to continually maintain and improve the quality of public dispatching services; and WHEREAS, the State of Virginia has designated the second week of April as a time to honor and recognize the vital contributions made by the Public Safety Dispatchers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf and on behalf of its citizens, does hereby express deepest appreciation for the services provided by the Public Safety Dispatchers; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does hereby declare the week of April 8 - 14, 1990, as Public Safety Telecommunicators Week in Roanoke County. 4/ 5/94 MHA For your information: called and p• O. Box 44, Roanoke, VA 24002, Roberta Bondurant, of Board resolution on I-73. asked me to mail her a copy from Bent Mountain that met She explained that she is part of group She is going to write letter to Clerk asking recently about I-73• to speak to Board at April 12 meeting. for a member of their group She said they wanted Board to rescind their resolution. not et her phone number and information and City Directory I did g does not 1 ist her . __-- --- __.___---__ . /'~: ~`; Brenda • ~/~, -~ ~, ~: r ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~C P.c/2 APR 08 ' 94 10 ~ 29Af~ N A C~7 ~ ~ RET) ~ ~ ~ ~ . A Sampre Z'ro~~ama~t~on ~~ . . ~ . (Add information abut your-county ~u ~in~ this A iocax perspective.) , . ~ t Coup ~ G~aweernnmer~t Week ~ . ~'a~~ona 9~4 . . ~ : Aprir.;1~-23,19 , .. _ ~ , . . ~ the future: ~ Meeting those challenges . pixierica faces many challenges novv and e -the gavemznents of the f uture. . successfully lies with county governor nts " - ' .. , ~ unf~u~ded mandates, which are ' . CoLuity governments are committed to stopp g - ~ .. . ~ . , and causing local servx~es to be cut back. depleting local revenues ~ ~- ~ d ants are the nation's health safety net, providing hospital an . County governor . health services to the poor and those wi~QUt msurance~ . ver,C-merits are' leading the fight to end violencek Force, which is per' County go . through programs, policies and N,ACo's Children s ji~itiatxve as suin solutions to help oux nation's txoubled youths. 1 g u~d rnr~mnnent ,are using te~hiual°P_.Y and innovation to tackle the naf~on s , Cu y $ ,problems: ~ ~ .. ~ .. ' dada table.in.providia~g ser~'ices di~x~ectly`to . . County governments are flexible an p . . . able to rovide, county-wide and regional solutions to problerits. . the people and are F . ericas counties axe America s future Xri recognition of the~cantributions , A,m our nation s counties. made and the leadership offered by ... 'Now, therefore be it xesolved by . {Your County,and State) hereby proclain~Covernvnent Week National County . APR a8 '94 1~~29AM N A CD tRET? NACo X40 Finn Stne~t N. W Ta. _ ~, - TE~EFAXN~JIV~ER: ~o~s DATE: v~ P,1~E Natrona! Association of Counties D.C. 20001 • 20x/ 393-ad30 ~ -~~~3~ TELE~'AXNUMBE~: ~- ~'' CONTACT PER~~~ AL NU1V~E~ 4F PAGES TRAM , IIYCL~JDtNG THIS COVER Tl~T LETTER: s.- . COri~NT3: Counties Care ~ for America