The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6/28/1994 - RegularO~ ROANp~.~ ti ~ A 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JUNE 28, 1994 ~~~a~~ BVelcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE AN AUDIT COMA~IITTEE MEETING AT 2:00 P.M. PRIOR TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-200. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:04 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Samuel Crews Coopers Cave Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS LBE ADDED ITEM C-1 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION UPON RETIREMENT OF TUDGE I~DD, AND EXECU'T'IVE SESSION ITEM 2.1- ® Recycled Paper ~;; . 344 A (7,~ LEGAL MATTER REGARDING REGION ~ _ SEWAGE _ _._ TREATMENT PIANT. _~: _n ._ _ ,, ;,;.~;, ;, C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOG1vITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of Judge Edward Kidd R-628941 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Support for Participation and Funding for the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) R-628942 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO ELIMINATING REFERENCES TO FUNDING AND CONSULTANT'S NAME URC ECH TO BRING BACK REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR CONSULTANT 2. Request for Approval of Payment to F & W Community Development Corporation for Water System Expenses Between September 1986 and January 1991. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) A-628943 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF $14,023.80 WITH FUNDING FROM THE FOREST EDGE ACCOUNT AND UTILITY FIIVD UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE URC 3. Reconsideration of the Adoption Leave Policy. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) A-62894-4 2 INDIVIDUALS SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF CHANGE IN ADOPTION LEAVE TO 30 DAYS a HCN MOTION TO RESCIND ALL ACTION RELATED TO LEAVE POLICY TAKEN ON 5/24/94 BIT MOTION TO AMEND HCN'S MOTION TO RESCIND 5/24 POLICY, AND KEEP ALL .IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE POLICY AND RESTORE ADOPTION LEAVE TO PRE 5/24 POLICY (30 DAYSI -DEFEATED AYES-BI.~ti EGK NAYS-FM. HCN, LBE HCN ORIGINAL MOTION TO RESCIND ALL ACTION FROM 5/24 - DEFEATED AYES-FM, HCN NAYS-BI;j, EGK, LBE E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS BL.T REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON UTILITY BILLING PROCEDURES OR REPORT TO INCLUDE SURVEY OF OTHER LOCALITIES ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT ON 7/12/94 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BL,T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING FOR ITEMS 1 - 3 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 7/26/94 URC BL,T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING FOR ITEM 4 2ND & PUBLIC HEARING - 7/26/94 AYES-BI~T,EGK,FM,HCN NAYS-NONE ABSTAIN - LBE 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse Stable Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Extending the Franchise of Boothe American Company D/B/A Salem Cable TV to Operate a Cable Television System in Roanoke County for a Period of 120 Days. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 0-62894-5 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 4 URC - ~~- 2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-62894-6 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-BI{T,EGK,FM,HCN NAYS-NONE ABSTAIN-LBE 3. Ordinance Declaring a Parcel of Real Estate Identified as Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15 Located off Homewood Circle in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District to be Surplus and Accepting/Rejecting an Offer for the Sale of Same. (John Willey, Property Manager) 0-62894-7 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD ACCEPTING OFFER OF BRIAN WILSON FOR $100 AND REMOVAL OF WELL AND RESERVOIR PER LETTER DATED APRIL 28,1994. URC J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission CHIEF FUQUA WILL MAKE RECOMII~NDATION FROM FIRE AND RESCUE CHIEFS BOARD AFTER THEIR 7/13 MEETING. 2. Virginia Western Community College Board LBE NOIVIINATED STANARD IANFORD TO A FOUR-YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE TUNE 30, 1998 K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA 5 ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND ~; 4i ; ~ WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM ' ` '' ~- ~-~ OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, ,:. THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ::~_.... _~_. _ _ AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. A-62894-8 FM MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA URC 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. A-62894-8.a 2. Appropriation of Surplus Federal Revenues to Cover Jail Operations Due to Increased Inmate Population. A-62894-8.b 3. Appropriation of Compensation Board Reimbursement for Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer. A-62894-8.c 4. Request for Acceptance of Extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the VDOT Secondary System. R-62894-8.d 5. Donation of Water Line Easement on Lot 7, Block 1, Section 7, Nottingham Hills from Charles R. Simpson, Inc. A-62894-8.e 6. Confirmation of Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. A-62894-8.f 6 d9..': o.r n. g: ~':.. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ,~~ Supervisor Nickens: Announced Grand Opening of Explore Park on June 30 at 10:00 a.m. Recommended arrival by 9:15 to get parking. Supervisor Johnson: Advised that the Audit Committee had their first meeting~rior to this Board meeting. Supervisor Kohinke: Reminded everyone that the cat ordinance goes into effect on July 1 and that he and Treasurer Fred Anderson are planning a small ceremony when he gets his cat license. Supervisor Eddy: 1) Announced that there was a news conference at 11:00 a.m. regarding the fly ash cleanup at Dixie Caverns Landfill. (Z) Advised he received a letter from VACo asking for a legislative contact and he suggested Paul Mahoney serve in that capacity. ~3) Asked about the citizen handbook. AMG responded that she is waiting for a decision on the balk and brash pickup. (4) Advised that resolutions requesting individual joint meetings with other valley governments had been mailed to the chief elected officials. (51 Received information from 5th PDC requesting interest in conducting a corridor study from Roanoke Valley to Smith Mountain Lake, and asked if there was Board support for the study. ECH advised that main concern was who would pap for road improvements. (6) Explained he received several requests from residents concerned about cut through traffic on such roads as Cresthill. VDOT has sent him information on hav to request control of such traffic. Asked if Board was interested is pursuing this issue. There was no interest in pursuing. M. CITIZENS' CONIlVIENTS AND CO1bIlVIiJNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS - UVV 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Fire and Rescue Reaction Response Times -May 1994 5. Report on 1991 Water Project 6. Report on Sick Leave Usage 7. Bond Project Status Report O. SCHOOL BOARD ISSUES 1. Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of Dr. Bayes Wilson, Roanoke County School Superintendent. A-62894-9 BL,T MOTION TO URC DR WILSON WAS PRESENT TO ACCEPT THE RESOLUTION A GI1~T CERTIFICATE AND AHAND-MADE FLAG OF THE COUNTY SEAL. 2. Work Session on School Capital Projects COUNTY STAFF WILL WORK WITH SCHOOL BOARD TO BRING BACK ON 7/26/94 MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON PROTECTS INCLUDING: (11 OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES AVAIIABLE (2~ COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH A BOND REFERENDUM AND FUNDING ALTERNATIVES: STUDENT POPULATION AT CAVE SPRING, BACK CREEK AND OAK GROVE, ELEM. SCHOOLS; # OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN CAVE SPRING SCHOOLS AND STUDENT PROTECTIONS. 3. Request for Authorization for the Roanoke County School Board to Submit Certain Literary Fund Applications. s (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) A-62894-10 BIT MOTION TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF $1.9 MILLION URC 4. Request to Apply for Inclusion in the Virginia Public School Authority's Fall 1994 Bond Sale. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) A-62894-11 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE $300,000 FOR ROOFS, $200,000 FOR RCOS. AND $200,000 FOR.. SITE IlViPROVEMENTS AT GLENVAR SCHOOLS -TOTAL $700,000 HCN AMENDED LBE'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE IMPROVEMENTS AT RCOS -TOTAL $500,000 AYES-BL~j, FM,HCN NAYS-EGK,LBE LBE'S ORIGINAL MOTION AMENDED BY HCN'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE RCOS AYES-BI,,T~GK,FM,HCN NAYS-LBE P. WORK SESSION 1. Amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance. MOVED TO EVENING SESSION Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To Discuss a legal matter, Enforcement of the Bingo Code (7) To Discuss a legal matter regarding the Regional Sewage Treatment Plant Agreement. HCN MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5:40 P.M. URC 9 R CERTIFIC~~'ION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION ~_~ A-62894-12 , ' ~ . ~~ --. BL T MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:05 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION: RESOLUTION URC EVENING SESSION NEW BUSINESS ITEM ADDED FOLLOWING PUBLIC FEARING: T-6 -APPROVAL TO JOIN VACO RISK POOL FOR PURCHASING REINSURANCE AND TPA SERVICES. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Public Hearing and Ordinance to Appropriate Funds for Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 0-62894-13 HCN MOTION TO WAIVE 2ND READING AND ADOPT ORD URC T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 21-3, Utility Service Tax, of .the Roanoke County Code by Providing for the Imposition of the Consumer Utility Tax on Cellular Telephones. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-62894-14 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 18-168 Schedule of Charges of Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal the Roanoke County Code to Provide for an io Increase in Base Charges df 14.5% for Fiscal Year 1994- 1995, an Increase in Base Charges of 25% for Fiscal Year 1995-1996, an Increase in the. Connection Fee to $1500.00, and to Provide for Certain Transition Provisions to Implement Same. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 0-62894-15 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.34 Acres from R-3 to C-1 to Operate a Training and Development Office, Located at 5670 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Maureen E. Poplstein. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-62894-16 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement, Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-62894-17 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Ordinance Amending the Roanoke County Code by the Enactment of Sec. 4-4, Definitions, Sec. 4-5, Recirculation System, Sec. 4-6, Water Treatment, Sec. 4-7 Water Supply Systems, Sec. 4-8 Sewage Disposal, Sec. 4-9, General Safety Provisions, Sec. 4-10, Operation, Sec. 4-11, Security, and Sec. 4-12, Safety and Rescue Equipment; Other Safety Features, and Sec. 4-13, Entry and Inspections, Enforcement, Penalties to Article I. In General of Chapter 4, Amusements to Provide Authority for Health Department Inspections of Public Swimming Pools and a Schedule of Fees. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-62894-18 ii HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CHANGES REC011~IlVIENIIEI LBE URC - _ _ _ 6. Resolution To Join the Virginia Association of Counties Risk Pool for the Sole Purpose of Purchasing Reinsurance and Third Party Administrative Services. R-62894-19 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COI~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE WORK SESSION 1. Changes to the Solid Waste Ordinance BOARD CONSENSUS TO (1) IMPLEMENT BULK & BRUSH COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR 6 MONTHS TRIAL BASIS -STAFF DIRECTED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLICITY OF CHANGES. ~2) CON']l'INUE TO FIX PRIVATE ROADS DAMAGED BY REFUSE COLLECTION UP TO A COST OF $2,000 PER YEAR (31 OFFER REAR LOADER COLLECTION TO CONDOl~'IINIUMS AND TOWNHOMES. OTHER BUSINESS 11) STAFF DIRECTED TO BRING BACK ON 8/23/94 PROPOSED ORDINANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW REPLACEMENT ONLY OF SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOMES WITH ANOTHER SINGLE- WIDE MOBILE HOME. 12) PMM UPDATED BOARD ON SEWAGE TREATMENT PIAIVT CONTRACT DISCUSSIONS 12 ~~r V. ADJOtf~tNMENT FM MOTION TO ADTOURN AT x:57 P.M. - UW 13 ~ POAN ,~. z ':: A z t.L~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~.~ a 3 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 28, 1994 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE AN AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING AT 2:00 P.M. PRIOR TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may 6e made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS ® Recycled Paper D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Support for Participation and Funding for the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 2. Request for Approval of Payment to F & W Community Development Corporation for Water System Expenses Between September 1986 and January 1991. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3. Reconsideration of the Adoption Leave Policy. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST RF.~iDING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse Stable Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. 2 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Extending the Franchise of Boothe American Company D/B/A Salem Cable TV to Operate a Cable Television System in Roanoke County for a Period of 120 Days. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3. Ordinance Declaring a Parcel of Real Estate Identified as Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15 Located off Homewood Circle in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District to be Surplus and Accepting/Rejecting an Offer for the Sale of Same. (John Willey, Property Manager) J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 2. Virginia Western Community College Board K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 3 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Appropriation of Surplus Federal Revenues to Cover Jail Operations Due to Increased Inmate Population. 3. Appropriation of Compensation Board Reimbursement for Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer. 4. Request for Acceptance of Extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the VDOT Secondary System. 5. Donation of Water Line Easement on Lot 7, Block 1, Section 7, Nottingham Hills from Charles R. Simpson, Inc. 6. Confirmation of Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1~~IlViUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Fire and Rescue Reaction Response Times -May 1994 5. Report on 1991 Water Project 6. Report on Sick Leave Usage 7. Bond Project Status Report 4 o. P. scxooL BOARD IssUEs 1. Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of Dr. Bayes Wilson, Roanoke County School Superintendent. 2. Work Session on School Capital Projects 3. Request for Authorization for the Roanoke County School Board to Submit Certain Literary Fund Applications. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 4. Request to Apply School Authority's Finance Director) WORK SESSION for Inclusion in the Virginia Public Fall 1994 Bond Sale. (Diane Hyatt, 1. Amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To Discuss a legal matter, Enforcement of the Bingo Code R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Public Hearing and Ordinance to Appropriate Funds for Cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 21-3, Utility Service Tax, of the Roanoke County Code by Providing for 5 the Imposition of the Consumer Utility Tax on Cellular Telephones. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 18-168 Schedule of Charges of Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal the Roanoke County Code to Provide for an Increase in Base Charges of 14.5% for Fiscal Year 1994- 1995, an Increase in Base Charges of 25% for Fiscal Year 1995-1996, an Increase in the Connection Fee to $1500.00, and to Provide for Certain Transition Provisions to Implement Same. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.34 Acres from R-3 to C-1 to Operate a Training and Development Office, Located at 5670 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Maureen E. Poplstein. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement, Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 5. Ordinance Amending the Roanoke County Code by the Enactment of Sec. 4-4, Definitions, Sec. 4-5, Recirculation System, Sec. 4-6, Water Treatment, Sec. 4-7 Water Supply Systems, Sec. 4-8 Sewage Disposal, Sec. 4-9, General Safety Provisions, Sec. 4-10, Operation, Sec. 4-11, Security, and Sec. 4-12, Safety and Rescue Equipment; Other Safety Features, and Sec. 4-13, Entry and Inspections, Enforcement, Penalties to Article I. In General of Chapter 4, Amusements to Provide Authority for Health Department Inspections of Public Swimming Pools and a Schedule of Fees. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COI~IlVIUIVICATIONS V. ADJOURNMENT 6 C-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-1 OF APPRECIATION TO EDWARD S. RIDD, JR. FOR SERVICE AS CHIEF JUDGE OF THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA GENERAL DISTRICT COURT WHEREAS, Edward S. Kidd, Jr. has served as a judge of the General District Court of the 23rd Judicial District of Virginia, which serves Roanoke County, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, since 1978; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd was appointed Chief Judge of that Court in 1980; and WHEREAS, during his time on the bench, Judge Kidd has been active in various statewide and national associations, including the American Judges Association, the American Bar Association, the American Judicature Society, the Association of District Court Judges of Virginia and the Virginia Bar Association; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd has served the citizens of the Roanoke Valley in an equitable and just manner, providing fair hearings and decisions to the hundreds of people who have passed through his courtroom; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd will be retiring from the General District Court on July 15, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its appreciation and gratitude to EDWARD S . KIDD, JR. for his service as Chief Judge of the 23rd Judicial District of Virginia General District Court; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Judge Kidd for a happy, healthy and rewarding retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File ~''. - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO EDWARD S. RIDD, JR. FOR SERVICE AS CHIEF JUDGE OF THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA GENERAL DISTRICT COURT WHEREAS, Edward S. Kidd, Jr. has served as a judge of the General District Court of the 23rd Judicial District of Virginia, which serves Roanoke County, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, since 1978; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd was appointed Chief Judge of that Court in 1980; and WHEREAS, during his time on the bench, Judge Kidd has been active in various statewide and national associations, including the American Judges Association, the American Bar Association, the American Judicature Society, the Association of District Court Judges of Virginia and the Virginia Bar Association; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd has served the citizens of the Roanoke Valley in an equitable and just manner, providing fair hearings and decisions to the hundreds of people who have passed through his courtroom; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd will be retiring from the General District Court on July 15, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its appreciation and gratitude to EDWARD S. RIDD, JR. for his service as Chief Judge of the 23rd Judicial District of Virginia General District Court; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Judge Kidd for a happy, healthy and rewarding retirement. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELDONATUESDAYOAJUNE 28UN19g4DMINISTRATION CENTER RESOTYTSON PARTICIPAT ONRESINNG THEPPO ROANORE RVALLEY COUN REGIONALIZATION GROUP WHEREAS, in September 1993, elected officials and business leaders met to discuss the regionalization of such services as water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley legislators agreed at that time to introduce legislation that could rebate state income tax on new businesses to local governments for a period of years regardless of the location of the new business, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group determined that a study should be conducted to review the various services provided by each local government and develop a list of those services that should be considered for regionalization, and WHEREAS, the group has requested that the Counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton share with the Roanoke Valley business community the cost to implement the study, and WHEREAS, it was also requested that each locality indicate by resolution their support for participation in this study. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group to review and recommend services that should be provided on a regional basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution eliminating references to funding and consultant's name, and by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None cc: File Roanoke Valley Leg W. Robert Herbert, Randolph M. Smith, B. Clayton Goodman Gerald A. Burgess, A COPY TESTE: ~~~-~- mod. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Lslators Roanoke City Manager Salem City Manager Vinton Town Manager Botetourt County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ! I AT A REGULAR MEETINT THE ROAN KERD OUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Support for Participation and Funding of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND Last year, Delegate C. Richard Cranwell suggested that the Roanoke Valley governments establish a regionalization group to study issues such as water, sewer, solid waste, econo otential oforntmore housing. The goal was to look at the p efficiencies, and the possibility of securing state funds that we are currently not receiving. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Committee asked Bill Evans, Vice President of Towers-Perrin to and interview all five localities, review their contracts, documents, and conduc re ionalization at lan oesti atedanco t hof potential areas for g $15,000. Mr. Evans has conducted Y 1 and Jacksonville,CFloridae~ North Carolina, Louisville, Kentuck , Towers-Perrin reported that such a study would actually cost $45,000. Some governments expressed reluctance to pay the increased cost, even though all had Tom Robertsonlt Pres dent not estimate. At the May 27 meeting, Carilion Health Systems and Chairman of the RalachianaPowe ruagreed Council, and Joe Vipperman, President of App to have the business commu e ~ swould pay o$22,500a f the m$451,000 basis. The local governor estimated cost for the study. In preparation for the next meeting on July 11, Delegate Cranwell decide if they are willing to pay their asked that each locality share of the new est alsoe sundestedlthatteach governing body adopt Senator Brandon Bell gg ~- a resolution of support for the regionalization group. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staf f recommends that the B r r su fort of ors part is ppation a in cthe resolution indicating the pP for the Towers Roanoke Valley Regionalizationsharep w d fbedlone-fifth of the Perrin Study. The County is government's 50 ~ matching share. When the exact funding determined, a request for an appropriation will be brought back to the Board. ~. ~~--~e~_ - Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------- ------------------- vnTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens .~-i AT A REGULAR MEELIDNAT THEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HE ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28,-1994 RESOLUTIONION IN THE ROANORE VALLEY REG ON IZATION GROUP Pp,RTICIPAT WHEREAS, in September 1993, elected officials and business leaders met to discuss the regionalization of such services as water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism, and WHEREP.S, the Roanoke Valley legislators agreed at that time to introduce legislation that could rebate state income tax on new businesses to local governments for a period of years regardless of the location of the new business, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group determined that a study should be conducted to review the various services provided by each local government and develop a list of those services that should be considered for regionalization, and WHEREAS, the group has requested that the Counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton share on a 50/50 matching basis with the Roanoke Valley business community the cost to implement the study, and WHEREAS, it was also requested that each locality indicate by resolution their support for participation in this study. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group to review and recommend services that should be provided on a regional basis, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County supports the independent study to be conducted by Towers-Perrin which will be financed by a 50/50 matching basis with the local business community and the participating localities. A-62894-3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ • AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Payment to F & W Community Development Corporation for Water System Expenses between September 1986 and January 1991 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~.-~P BACKGROUND: In 1986 Roanoke County purchased the water supply and storage facilities of the Forest Edge Water System from Fralin and Waldron. From the period of September 1986 until January 1991 Fralin and Waldron had continued making improvements to the water system by drilling new wells, improving storage supply and in some cases abandoning existing wells. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In April 1991, Fralin and Waldron submitted an invoice to Mr. Craig in the amount of $23,514.05 for work completed. Mr. Craig had requested that this item be placed on hold until well construction was complete in the development. In March of this year Mr. Craig scheduled a meeting with Fralin and Waldron for April 8, 1994 to review the April 1991 invoice. This meeting was postponed until May of this year due to Mr. Craig's passing. Section 22-31 of the Roanoke County Code states that Roanoke County will pay all costs associated with storage facilities and has the option to participate with the developer to pay one-half of the cost of constructing new water supplies. In accordance with this section and a breakdown of the 1991 invoice (copy attached) Roanoke County's share would be $14,023.80. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $4,321.05 are available in the Forest Edge account. The remaining $9,702.75 would come from the unappropriated balance fund. ' Q`1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize $14,023.80 be paid to Fralin and Waldron to finalize the Forest Edge Water System purchase. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gary Ro rtson, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility irector County Administrator Approved (~ ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs motion to ap rove ayment of Eddy x $14,023.28 with fundin from Johnson x the Forest Edge Account and Kohinke x Utility Fund Unappropriated Minnix x Balance Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance FOREST EDGE WATER SYSTEM COSTS AND COUNTY PARTICIPATION DATE ITEM COUNTY COST PARTICIPATION 19-Sep-94 Water Sample Analyses $686.95 $686.95 01-Jan-87 Install M.H. Drain -Well No. 5 $120.00 $120.00 12-Feb-87 Controls-Storage Tank/Wells No. 3, 4, & 5 $236.00 $236.00 15-Mar-87 Furnish/Install Tank Vault Door $752.42 $752.42 13-Apr-87 Seeding-Tank Lot/Well Lot $750.00 $750.00 02-Jun-87 Well No. 14 $5,600.00 $2,800.00 02-Jun-87 Well No. 15 $4,536.00 $2,268.00 02-Jun-87 Well NO. 16 $3,300.00 $1,650.00 02-Jul-87 Pulled Pump-Well No. 12, Set No. 13 $298.00 $298.00 06-Jul-87 Water Sample Analysis $20.00 $20.00 07-Jul-87 Water Sample Analysis $10.00 $10.00 21-Sep-87 Water Sample Analysis $10.00 $10.00 27-Oct-87 Grout/Fill Dry Well Holes $583.11 $291.56 03-Nov-87 Water Sample Analyses $280.00 $280.00 03-Nov-87 Water Sample Analyses $48.00 $48.00 06-Nov-87 Seal Dry Well Holes $1,700.00 $850.00 17-Nov-87 Install Pump/Controls Well No. 6 $1,866.85 $1,866.85 10-Jan-89 Plan/Design -Well No. 1 $282.50 $282.50 28-Feb-89 Plan Review -Well No. 1 $95.00 $47.50 11-May-89 Tank Lid/Brackets $162.80 $162.80 06-Jun-90 Grout/Fill Dry Well Hole $590.17 $295.09 01-Dec-86 Water Sample Analysis $10.00 $10.00 13-Dec-88 Well No. 1 - Well/Valve Vault $576.25 $288.13 01-Jan-91 Assessed Value -Well No. 1 $1,000.00 $0.00 TOTAL $23,514.05 $14,023.80 A-62894-4 ACTION NO. _ ITEM NUMBER '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Reconsideration of the Adoption Leave Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND Several months ago, the Board of Supervisors expressed concern about County use of sick leave. At the May 24 Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board held a work session to discuss changes to the County's various leave policies. At that time the Board received a report and recommendations from an Employee Leave Policies Team. Included in the recommendations which were adopted by the Board was reduction of the use of sick leave allowed for paternity, extended maternity and adoption from 30 days to 20 days. However, use of sick leave for family illness was increased from three day per illness with a maximum of six days per year to ten days per year. At the June 14 Board of Supervisors meeting, Supervisor Kohinke requested that adoption leave be discussed and reconsidered. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 24 made the following changes to the Sick Leave Policy: 1. Reduced the use of Sick Leave allowed for Paternity, Extended Maternity and Adoption from thirty days to twenty days. 2. Increased the use of Sick Leave for Family Sickness from a maximum of six days per fiscal year to ten days per fiscal year. 3. Established procedures for management to review with their employees the use of sick leave at state levels of usage. The Leave Policy Team studied this issue extensively. While they recommended a reduction in one area of family leave, they recommended an increase in use of sick leave for family illness, a benefit that will be available and helpful to the majority of employees. r '. M , The County's leave policy for adoption is much more liberal than the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act. This Act does not require paid leave, but mandates that employers must allow their employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid job protected leave for certain family and medical reasons. If the adoption leave policy is increased to 30 days, it would be inconsistent with the maternity and paternity leave which will remain at 20 days. All three leaves have been established for the purpose of "bonding" with a new child. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Because the Leave Policies Team worked long and hard on this issue, I suggest that we leave the adoption policy at 20 days as they recommended, which is what the Board adopted at the May 24th meeting. ~ . s~-,~ Elmer CE1mer C. Hodge~`~- County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) (See Belowl Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens Motion #1 - Harry C. Nickens motion to rescind all action related to leave policy taken on May 24, 1994. No vote Motion #2 - Bob L. Johnson Motion to amend Harry C. Nickens' motion to rescind May 24 policy, and keep all improvements that were included in the policy and restore adoption leave to pre May 24 policy (30 days). Defeated Ayes: Johnson, Kohinke Nays: Minnix, Nickens, Eddy Motion #3 - Harry C. Nickens original motion to rescind all action from May 24. Defeated Ayes: Minnix, Nickens Nays: Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy RESULT OF VOTES IS THAT POLICY REMAINS AS ADOPTED ON MAY 24, 1994 cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources 11JIIIII~IIIIIII~illllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllillllilllliillllli,~ _ - - = - - - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ! _ - - _ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: _ l~~.C~r~:~S i•sJ~F.'.~~ ~ c? ~ L~ ~`~O~(~~-tc1N ~.zA ~l`~ ~U ~tcc~ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _ c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless i t t d b th ~ ns ruc e y e majority of the Board to do otherwise. - -_ - c ^ S Baker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Qpuestions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - c - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - - c = -- - - NAME ,~ ~:t~ ~ ~ ti~ - - ADDRESS ] L~ `~ ~ C~ ) ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ cS l~_ ~~ ~+ ~J ~ ~~ - - - ~. ~ ~~ - PHONE .. ~~ g f ~ ~ - mllllllll IIIiIlIIIIItNIIlIIN!!lIIIIIl1111111l1lt!!~I!l1111111!!!iillll Ililll111111l1!!1!!IlIIIINN!!11!l~tNNiNI!!!N!!il111~ ~ -3 MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD MY NAME IS JANET SCHEID AND I RESIDE AT 1453 WOLF CREEK DRIVE IN THE TOWN OF VINTON. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO YOU ON THE ISSUE OF ADOPTION LEAVE. I AM BEFORE YOU THIS AFTERNOON AS A ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEE, AS AN ADOPTIVE PARENT, AND AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE BLUE RIDGE ADOPTION GROUP. MY PRINCIPLE OBJECTION TO THE REDUCTION OF ADOPTION LEAVE FROM 6 WEEKS TO 4 WEEKS IS ONE OF EQUITY. AS THE COUNTY POLICY STANDS TODAY A BIRTH MOTHER IS ALLOWED 10 WEEKS OF SICK LEAVE TO BOND WITH HER NEW CHILD. AN ADOPTIVE MOTHER IS ONLY ALLOWED 4 WEEKS TO BOND WITH HER NEW CHILD. THIS IS NOT EQUAL AND IT IS NOT FAIR. IN PREPARING FOR THIS PRESENTATION I HAVE DONE SOME RESEARCH AND FOUND OUT THAT MANY ADOPTION AGENCIES REQUIRE THE ADOPTIVE MOTHER TO TAKE FROM 6 WEEKS TO 6 MONTHS OFF FROM WORK TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION PERIOD FOR THE CHILD TO ADJUST TO THEIR NEW HOME. OTHER AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE TWO LOCAL ONES, RECOMMEND THAT ONE OF THE PARENTS REMAIN HOME WITH THE ADOPTED CHILD A MINIMUM OF 6 WEEKS. WHY DO THESE AGENCIES, PLUS MOST PEDIATRICIANS, FEEL THAT 6 WEEKS IS A MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME? BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT IT TAKES AT LEAST THAT LONG FOR THE MOTHER AND CHILD TO GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER AND TO FORM THOSE IMPORTANT, CRITICAL FAMILY BONDS. WHY IS ROANOKE COUNTY TREATING THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO BUILD THEIR FAMILY THROUGH ADOPTION DIFFERENTLY THAN THOSE WHO GIVE BIRTH? THERE ARE CHILDREN ACROSS THIS COUNTRY AND ALL OVER THE WORLD WITHOUT PERMANENT FAMILIES. AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY, SHOULDN'T THE COUNTY BE DOING WHAT IT CAN TO ENCOURAGE ADOPTION? IF I HAD GIVEN BIRTH TO MY SON, THE COUNTY, THROUGH OUR HEALTH INSURANCE, WOULD HAVE PAID 80% OF THAT COST AND UNDER TODAY'S POLICY WOULD PROVIDE ME WITH 10 WEEKS OFF TO BOND WITH HIM AND CARE FOR HIM. TIME FOR BOTH OF US TO MAKE ALL THE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO OUR SCHEDULES AND PRIORITIES AND FIND GOOD, SAFE DAY CARE BEFORE RETURNING TO MY COUNTY JOB. AS AN ADOPTIVE MOTHER, THE COUNTY DOES NOT INCUR ANY OF THE COSTS OF ADOPTION, AND ONLY ALLOWS ME 4 WEEKS OF TIME TO TRY TO ACCOMPLISH ALL THE SAME THINGS A BIRTH MOTHER DOES -BOND WITH MY NEW SON, CARE FOR HIM, MAKE ALL THE SAME ADJUSTMENTS PLUS MANY MORE SUCH AS HELPING THIS BABY ADJUST TO A NEW CULTURE, NEW HOME, NEW CAREGIVERS, AND FIND DAY CARE. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS REDUCTION IN LEAVE WAS A RECOMMENDATION OF THE LEAVE TEAM. IT MAY BE A SMALL POINT, BUT NO ONE THAT HAS USED ADOPTION LEAVE WAS ON THE LEAVE TEAM. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE LEAVE TEAM PROCESS WAS THAT THERE WAS CONCERN FROM COUNTY MANAGEMENT THAT PATERNITY LEAVE HAD BEEN ABUSED. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY MEMBERS OF THE LEAVE TEAM THAT THERE WAS VERY LITTLE, IF ANY, DIRECT DISCUSSION OF ADOPTION LEAVE. BUT THE RESULTANT RECOMMENDATION TO REDUCE PATERNITY LEAVE ALSO REDUCED ADOPTION LEAVE. IT ALMOST SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS WAS AN UNFORESEEN, UNPLANNED, AND CERTAINLY UNDESIRABLE CONSEQUENCE. COULD IT BE THAT ADOPTION LEAVE IS BEING REDUCED IN ORDER TO TAKE CARE OF A PERCEIVED PROBLEM WITH PATERNITY LEAVE. WHY NOT DEAL WITH PATERNITY LEAVE SEPARATELY OR DEAL WITH ABUSE OF PATERNITY LEAVE WITH THE EXISTING MANAGERIAL TOOLS THAT ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS HAVE AT THEIR DISPOSAL. WHAT IS THE COUNTY REALLY ACCOMPLISHING BY REDUCING ADOPTION LEAVE FROM 6 WEEKS TO 4 WEEKS? MY GUESS IS THAT ADOPTION LEAVE HAS BEEN UTILIZED BY NO MORE THAN HALF A DOZEN COUNTY EMPLOYEES (AN AVERAGE OF ONE EMPLOYEE PER YEAR FOR THE SIX YEARS ADOPTION LEAVE HAS BEEN AVAILABLE) AND THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE. ONE MIGHT ASK THE QUESTION DOES THE BENEFIT TO THE COUNTY, WHICH IS ONE EMPLOYEE PER YEAR CHARGING TWO FEWER WEEKS TO SICK LEAVE, OUTWEIGH THE COST TO THAT EMPLOYEE AND HER FAMILY, PARTICULARLY THE CHILD. THE REAL RESULT IS THAT AN ADOPTIVE PARENT, WHO HAS ALREADY BEEN PUT THROUGH THE WRINGER FINANCIALLY AND EMOTIONALLY, IS DENIED THE LEAVE NECESSARY TO CARE FOR HER BABY. MAYBE A REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE POSITION IS TO SEPARATE OUT ADOPTION LEAVE FROM THE CATEGORY OF "BONDING LEAVE" AND REINSTATE THE SIX WEEKS OF LEAVE. IF WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT IT IS JUST AS IMPORTANT FOR AN ADOPTIVE MOTHER TO HAVE ADEQUATE TIME TO BOND WITH A NEW CHILD AS IT IS FOR A BIRTH MOTHER, THAT VERY FEW EMPLOYEES (ONE PER YEAR) ARE USING ADOPTION LEAVE AND THAT THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY ABUSE OF THIS LEAVE A REASONABLE SOLUTION WOULD SEEM TO BE TO HAVE A MATERNITY LEAVE POLICY OF 10 WEEKS, A PATERNITY LEAVE POLICY OF 4 WEEKS AND AN ADOPTION LEAVE POLICY OF 6 WEEKS. THANK YOU FOR AGREEING TO RECONSIDER THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE AND ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT MY VIEWS. ~jlllillll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIiIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111jJ - - - - - - - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - = APPE CE REQUEST - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS c SUBJECT: '~~ , _ . ,. ~ ~ ~~ W ..., .. ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will whethe - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at atl times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIYID UALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. . PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - _. - - = -_ =_~. __ ! m1111111111111t111iii~iIIIINil1111111111Iiillllllllllllllililillliilliliilllliilliit111111111111111111111Nilltilll~rt~lttll~ ACTION NO. ITEM N0. ~ /+ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for July 26, 1994. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roger & Barbara Hale. (2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. (3) An ordinance to rezone 2.76 acres from R-1 to I-1 to construct a warehouse distribution facility located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. (4) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a private horse stable located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mona S. Sutphin. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. G ~-`f STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and rezoning ordinances for the reading and public hearing adopt the first reading of these purpose of scheduling the second for July 26, 1994. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 4, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens vote No Yes Abs For staff use only ~ _ I COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date-[p~~ ry~ receiv ~~ - applic~~ tee: PCBZA ~tqs/~~ / placards issued: ,E/ 1305 date•/ ~ .zC~ Case lumber. 1 ~ ~j ~ j Check type of application fil d (check all that apply): O REZONING I~SPECIAL USE ~ VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~tio~a e r -+' $~L,r'° axa- 4K a.l ~ Address: Zt~'i~4 SQ~• Cc u~uo a1. ~--~'~ . Phone: ~ 50 ' ~ ~`~ 1 Zip Code: a~. ; ~ Owner's name: r Address: j ~--~~ /~-~ ,~4rjGJ ~- Phone: Zip Code: Location of property: ~-~"aUt~ Tax Map Number: ~c..i . G a -- (- t'a- ~ ~y . Ga " l- `~ SjJ 1z^^~ C °~ ~ ~ `-' ~~ e ' Magisterial District: A.~a 1bA 93~-~ Wes-l-wa.-~} Lv~ • ~ Community Planning Area: C ~ ErL~~! A ~- Size of parcel (s): Ar-. ~ (~. ~ acres Existing Zoning: ~. ( , Existing Land Use: S U~ 41F. ~'~, I--t t ~~ 2~ ~ jl~r~-'LZ sq.ft. ................. Proposed Zoning: R-- I Prolp,~osed Land Use: slv~(z'~~ ~L.l u~ 1 p~;,4~, s~~-.arc- +~c e- y 10~-~ ~S ........... For Staff Use On/y ~4 ~5E T~IY'E P~~+~A~ S~cte . Does the p el meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE lS REQUIRED FIRST. YES Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. • If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Se s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Rrs as v Ns ~ Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application `•;< Metes and bounds description Justification '~` Adjoining property owners /hereby certify chat / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of t/1,e'ow~er. Owner's Signature: 6J `~-L O.r-b r'+.M~- ~! ~~-~ a ~t.~ as ~,, .--U~' anlJ-0.10.• P. ~ ct~.0~ ctltT~ . ' „t.a., li:t.c1~ G- I k,NSwE~:S 1CJ THE JU~TiFiCATIGiJ FOR REZONIN~~ OR SPECIAL USE PERr1IT REOUi=ST C'UESTIONS: 1. WHEN WE GOT OUR HORSES IN MARCH 1993 WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT UUR PROPERTY WAS STILL ZONED AGRICULTURAL. WE HAU BEEN GIVEN 1"HAT INFORMATION BY SEVERAL DIFF!~REN1" RELIABLE SOURCES. wE WOULD NOT HAVE PUT ALL OF THE MONEY, TIME, ANU EFFORT INTO FENCING THE LAND, BUYING THE HORSES, AND CLEAtdING Ol-T THE OLD BARN IF WE HAD NOT 6ELIEVED 1HE ZONING WAS UtdCHANGEL`. r?Y HUSBAND'S F"AMILY HAS LIVED ON THIS LAND FOR ALMOST 80 YEARS AND 1"HAY USED 1HESE PASTI!RES FOR CATTLE AtJD HORSES FUR MANY YEARS. SO. ALTHOUGH THE ZONIPJG IS ttO~J R1, PF.ObABLY E+ECAI-SE OF THE SUBDIVISION GL EN VAR EAS1 THE HALE F'F:OPER1'IES HAVE RLWAYS BEEN USED FOR FARMIIJG AND LIVESTC!C:K. WE WOULD LIY,E TO EE ABLE TO CGNTINI-E USING OUR LAND AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN USED. 2 THE SPECIAL l-SE PEF.MIT CONFORMS TO ROANOKE COUNTY'S GUIDELINES BECAUSE WITH UUR ACREAGE WE WERE TOLD THAT WE 4JOL-LD BE ALLOWED FOUR HORSES. WE ONLY HAVE THREE. THE HOP.SES ARE ALL OWNED BY US. WE DO NOT 6UARU HORSES. THEY P.RE USED FOR OUk OWN PRIVATE FAMILY PLEASURE. WE DO NOT kUN A STABLE, GIVE LESSONS, OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. 3. THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT WOl!LU ALLOW US TO KEEP UUR THREE HORSES THAT ARE ti'ERY LMPORTANT TO OUR FAMILY. ALL OF THE ADJOINING PROPcP.I'1' "~~' OWNEF:S HHVE CUMr1ENTED O1~ HUW rtUCH THEY ENJOY THE HUKSES. Ot•JE MAN SAIU 1"HAi HE EELIEVES THAT THE HORSES INCREASE. THE VRL-~E OF HZS PF.OPEF:"TY 6EC:Al-SE WHEN PEOPLE VISIT, THEY C:OMr?ENT UN HOt^J NICE IT IS TU :REF HORSES FROM YOUR BACK PORCH. OtJE NEIGHS=OR SAIU THAT HE HAU AEOU1' 1H°ENTY-F1vE PI CIURES OF lHErt. lHE NEIGHBUkI-!UUU CHLLUF;EN ESPECiHLLY LOVE 1"HE HORSES. WE HAVE GIVEN StJFERVISED RIDES TO NEIGF!i/ORS 7HAT HAVE VISITI=D US ANU Ul!R TWU UAUC:HTERS. THE GENERAL FEELING SEEMS TO 6E ONE OF GREAT PLEASUPE IN E!EING CLOSE TO A CITY AND STILL BEING AC+LE TO ENJOY SOME CO!)NT"RY LIFE. ALSO, OUR PRIVATE GRAVEL ROAD RL!t`:S BETWEEt: THE GLENVAR EAST PROPERTIES Ri~!D THE PASTURE. SO, IT'S NOT LIKE THE PASTURE IS BORDERING !J F` AGAINST ANl'UNE'S BACKYARD. I DON'T SEE THAT OUR HORSES WOULD HAVE AN 1' EFFECT EITHER -~+,=,Y OtJ PUEsLIC SEF;VICES AND FACILITIES. THANt: YOU! ,~ ~s `L-~ . ~I \.' "'flp0 ~A2.` ,~ ~ ~ ~q ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~9 ~ ~ -~ _-~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ` ~ i ~ ~ ~ i \a ~ ~ ~- ~~ i ~ , Q ~ _~~...- _ . V N ~ I //~ ~ W ~ ~ _ ,~~ ~F~ 1~~~ 0 I ~ ~9 J ~ ~ ~ G-i ~~ ~ ~~~ ~z~\ o,P \°~ ~~~ ~ ~P .~ - • ~~ c~ '; ~~ ~~ N V ~, ~ ~~ ~~ ( NG ~ 9t4SE-r 30 \Op ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ h e ~ 'f ~ h i j'y G3too=J~~~ ~-~ ~I) (~ h / ~-r~- ~ ?.O/3 A_. ~`~ ~ ~~ n ~Ew T.?.ier +I N ' + ~ ~S.G y S ~s3'f~y,• ~ ~ AO Et C/R~ N i ~~~ /// . ~go,~.po vEO SEq: DAr~O.~% ~;.r~rry P~•si/n~i.+~,~ COMMi.SS'ion/ /YlAi° FiQON! iPECO~vs FO/e ~o/y/~/ h! y~LE' ~/~ r~ tiicii/iTy n~l.9P of i/Ew T~ACj-s /¢ Z •BE~i/G A ~2E0/I//S/on/ of T.PACT C " OF .V1AP M.VOE FOR M.~lL/OE /i/.9LE I HEREBY CERTIPY THAT THIS '1~~~~ ~QRRECT, ov i i~~ ///?~ ,~oA~o~E ~o~N~ VIRGINIA sY T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINEERS x SURVEYORS SCALE 1' ?QD _ _ 3 KING i. ~ ~~ -- `-' - -- ~ ~,a, 3y'~,• ~;, `~~ ~~~ • GRAN~A~. ti tic _Y ~ `aw~ ~\~~ s~~G h 613 "ROC7C \Oy = µa T _ 1G~ ~_' ~ s w p~yl ~e . 1 1 ~ t 1. `S -I~-\~ GCENV~F~I~:i~ ~\.1••~~ i~N~~~'-. , t ~~~~. l ~ \• E •~ ~ _~= _: ~~ .~~ VICINITY MAP ~ ~ l ~{. G-~ D NORTH .. ~~' DEPART'MENT OF PLANNIATG ~T/T/Gn/ER.' i~CG~iQ a.,d P~nK'~3~1~ tlA~~ _~ " 1=. TAX MAP NG'Mf3E~: 5~ C~ - 1- /~ cnc~ - `~ AND ZONING :~' ~i'ELJUFS7".' S~cC i~,c. G~~ f'E~c~r1iT - For staff use only COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. S~~J P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date rec ived: IC, t received by: - app(icatio " ~ LL PC/BZ~A-~a~ p(acar s issued: `~S BOS d te: ~-- ~ t Case umber: / ' ~ ~ /j . Check type of application filed (check all that apply): a REZONING ®SPECIAL USF OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Phone:703-342-4002 D. Jeffry Parkhi 11 Zip Code: 24005 Address: P.O. box 1034, Roanoke, Virginia Owner's name: House of Prayer Trustees ~ Phone: 703-890-284 Address: p, 0. Box 21, Vinton, Virginia Zip Code: 24170 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 71.07-1-26.2 Intersection Hardy Road and_ Road and Temple _ Feather Magisterial District: ~ ~,~ -f-~~ . Community Planning Area: `( GV'~N Size of parcel (s): 2 r ~ acres l 02 (CL70 sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R-1 Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Zoning: R-1 Proposed Land Use: Rel igi au's~ Assembly;=. 250 ~ seats i gltial:.sanctuary, ~'- classrooms, administration (~00 seat total expansion) fel9oirtship For Stall Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REOUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO . .. ... ............ y 9 Variance of Section(s) None of the Roanoke Count Zonin Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. w v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application '~'<< Metes and bounds description '< Proffers, if applicable Justification ~(~ >~~° Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner o/ the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent y.~the owner. Owner's Signature: ' ,> _ ~ ( for StaN Use On/y: Case Number ~...~ Applicant D. Jeffry Parkhill Hughes Associates Architects for House of Prayer The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thorough) f as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district•classification in the zoning ordinance. Religious Assembly facilities are compatible and consistant with the neighborhood conservation land use. The property would be undesirable as a residential development due to the proximity to both )lardy Road and Feather Road (major through fares). Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ~- Religious facilities are permitted in the R-1 districts by special use permits. This property is restricted by purchase covenants to be either single family residential or religious facilities. Two adjoining properties are already religious facilities. This site is located closer to the geographical center of the House of Prayer congregation. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. This project would have little impact on the adjoining properties or the surround area. Traffic patterns would be "off peak" due to the schedule of services and activities. lJater and sewer is available. Usage would be equal or less than a comparable residential development. Schools, parks,recreation areas would not be impacted. \ ~ `~ d ! LL ~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~' l~I) { ~ aaaa ~ ~~ !S{ ~ .,.~.~ ,1 n JUt~'h'1 i~Q1 ~ ~v Q _ < ~~ ~ N -: ~ W ~ Q m_ ~~ m~ w F- J -rt {~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q a N N ~~ ~ d °o o ~ ~ ~ ~ w to 3 ~z dui z ~ ~ Q'• r ~ ~ " ~ tri ~ ~ F' ~~ _ _ Ox> Z p ~ N Z~ l~ c r cn O ~ N ~ d ~ ~ ~~ UI~ ~ ~z O Z OdQ d~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~" ~R ~ Q' 0..~ J NF' p~ F I ~ a •1 i ~~$ ~s~3 ~7:~ G-3~ ROAH02CE COQNTY UTILITY DEPl+RZ'~NZ' APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 18 Play 1994 D~ Jeffry Parkh.i•11 phone X31 '~2-4n0? Name of Applicant Ff~har Accnri.atac Arr~i.Lte.Ct~ --~ ~-- Address of Applicant P.O; Box 1Q34, Roanoke ~Vi.rgini.a 2.40.05 Name of Developer House of Pra yer Phone (70~) 890-2842 . Address of Developer P 0 Box 21 Vinton Virginia 24179 Name of_ Design Engineer Hughes Associates Archit. Phone (7Q31 3424002 Address of Design ErigineerP~O.• Box 1034, Roanoke Virginia 24QQ5 Name of Contact Person D•. Jeffry Parkhill Name of Proposed Development House of Prayer Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) • Phase I - 250 seat sanctuary wi.th.adm%ni.strative space (2 offices) and sunday G-~ school classrooms,( Phase II -Additional classroom space and 40 X 60 fellowship hall Phase III - Interfor sanctuary expansion to X00 total seating capacity and expansion of fellowship hall to 60 X lOQ family life center Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND~PLANIMETRIC N'[,fi~ER): Hardy Road at inter~ectinn of Faathar Rnari anri Temple Read -- Size of proposed development in acres: ~ 2•~J Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? ~_ No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (QVEZ) . Signature of Applican t _~ - _-~- ~ . o ;/ c ` ~j ~ - ~• ~ ~~ \ 1 a. QJo'A oM~~od a~Fl~ an~~ o~n~7 ! I. ~~ ~ r~~o a6' G ~G°J~~~ ~ - .1 c~ , cd ~ I I I o ,~e _. '.1 =•lo ~ ~ • .' O r - f „ N. ~ I .. '~ ~ ~__. .. .. _... _.__ ' .. C~s~i~ f{'~ I I 1 ~~ 1 i, ••, m . ,'1 ' ~ Z~ =~Z~ ~•'' 1 i _ r-• .~ DOiz . 1 `.` .Q.- _ . \, ~` \ I N ; Q` Q , ~ I N•„ •,` ` tai - N 1 GI 3~`7 ~~~ \ ~ :~~, ~ v ~ < n ~ c', v O ~ CpE,2 1 ~ .. ~ V I ~p +r ~ ~ ¢ Z h bya r ' ~ ~\i* 1 ~. c ( ? o ~o ~~ ~ ~ 0 e ~ Q• ro .i ,I %~ 1 :; Y _ `\.. •r O 1 ~ - C r ' \ ^ ^ I 7 V ~ ~• , ,1\ ~~~/ \ ~ O tit m , I w~ ` - ~ -• .. / "' :• i .,• ~ ~ V ~ D ~ 1 i • ~ N ~f~ ~ tidy N . ~ .. / •~ ~ „ Fjal `thy ' ~ ~-// ~ a ~s ~a'~ o •M ~~~:r.~~•:~ suf ! a _ ~ ~,~~ - j,- ,~~ _ C c t~,VTr L q ,~ ~~ L,..~~ V,N RCN NEi `~• S .; ..,,:.E~ -/~::"' . + 4~uS+-~yl~ _ , ,s-.~• ~.~ ~.:_~ . =:~~'^" VICINITY M A Pi ~ _ ~~_ ~: ~ w .._~: . I NORTH _ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA7G ~~T/r/OVER : ~7. JEFf'Ry pd,~KN/.C~- • ~NDUSE pF PRsi )/E,t' Ti7b'STE~S~ L ~~ • AND ZONING TdX M,dP n/1J~`1t~ER: '1 /• G7 -- /- ~ G . ,2 ..,. I?EOUCST; S/~£-Ci11 L G5~ yF,?MIT 1(~~L/G~oUS ASS~MBLy COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~t~' (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only ~"' "'' dat i~~i~di-''-~/n ~ receiveyd bv: ' a~pticvatioh faE:~ f PC/62A date: I acards issued: 1305 date: Case Number: .~, Proposed Zoning: I-1 Industrial District •.Fv~.sra/t.use'only.• Proposed Land Use: Warehouse distribution Use Typa:_ .....................j......: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district. YES _ X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ' If;rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO x Variance of Section(s) ... of.the.Roanoke..County.Zoning. Ordinance.•in..order.to:...' N/A 1. .L _ ~~ use appttcatton complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application '~~ Metes and bounds descri lion '~h t p Proffers, if applicable Justification <`~=f Water and sewer application Ad'oinin ~ g property owners /hereby certify that / am either th owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the kno a ge an t of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ Agent Applicant Roanoke County Department of Economic Develoyment on behalf of Hanover Direct/ Domestications The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEET Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. According to the Future Land Use map located in the Planning Department, the property is identified as either Development or Transition. In regards to the Development designation the land adjacent as well as the land across Hollins Road has been either zoned or used for industrial purposes for quite some time. With this in mind and the existence of established residential and commercial development in the area, some change in the Land Use Plan may be necessary. The general description found in the land use principles of the Transition category seem somewhat more appropriate than do the principles descn'bed in the Development designation. And while the Transition .designation does not specifically mention industrial warehousing as a use the proposed project does provide for a logical extension to areas existing development patterns. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Impact upon the site in question, the adjoining properties and the surrounding area will be minimal since Hanover Direct/Domestirations is already in the process of building a distribution center on land they currently own. The impact of not rezoning the property would be that Hanover would build a smaller facility and the sale of the property in question would then be terminated. If this were to occur, then Hanover would simply build a retaining wall to divide the property. In addition, when VDOT purchases land to widen Hollins Road they would negotiate with the owners of the property in question for a portion of the property. This would further isolate this residentially zoned property. . G-3 For SlaH Use On/y: Case Number ~~ 3. Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; Purpose three is met by creating an environment that is harmonious with the existing and proposed business environment. Thus, the cross purposes of the business environment and the residentially- zoned tract (soon to be vaca_n_ t) will be eliminated allowing the movement of goods and services in a convenient and effective manner. - 7. Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; Purpose seven is met by the creation of 450 jobs with an annual payroll of $12,500,00. In addition, the construction of a 530,000 square foot facility with a value of over $12,000,000 will generate annual property taxes of over $135,000. Additional taxes will be generated through the collection of sales taxes on purchases made by Virginia residents. The site is free from flooding, has access to water and sewer, abuts a state road that recently received STAA approval for truck traffic, and has been designated by the .County as its top priority in regards to improvements. Land abutting each side of tax parce139.09-1-4 & 4.1 is either used for industrial purposes and so zoned or vacant industrially zoned land. G~3 County of Roanoke Department of Economic Development (703) 772-2069 M E M O RAN D U M TO: Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning FRO r'an T. Duncan, Assistant Director DATE: May 24, 1994 SIIBJECT: Request to rezone 2.76 acres for Hanover Direct Please accept the attached rezoning application as prepared by the Department of Economic Development for the benefit of Hanover Direct and more specifically, its Domestications warehouse on Hollins Road. I will serve as the agent for the purpose of submitting the necessary documentation for this rezoning application. Mr. Dan Horner, Mrs. Maryellen Goodlatte, and Mr. Bob Rhudy will be available to answer any questions that may arise during the entire process. As you know Hanover Direct-Domestications announced that they would build a 450,000 square foot warehouse/distribution facility on roughly 54 acres along Hollins Road this past February. Because of attractive building costs and changes within the Domestications business plan, a 530,000 square foot facility is now being considered for the first phase of this project. As you may recall, Hanover has agreed to conditions within the public-private partnership that would penalize Hanover if they failed to have a facility of at least 1,000,000 square feet in total after the third year of occupancy of phase 1. In order to accomplish this, they have found it necessary to purchase the Anglin property (tax parcels 39.09-1-4 &~4.1) along Hollins Road and the south eastern border of Hanover's existing tract. I hope that this brief summary of the reasons for this purchase and ultimately this rezoning request, answers some of your questions. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments that you, your staff, or that the Planning Commission may have. ~-3 ~ w y 4 /~/ Z~~ ~ ' \ ~ U F ~ ~Va 2 i F- i~ W ~ RI i / O LL tfm7 ~ ~ 1 / i / \ LL / ~ 1 i \ ' / ~l`\\ \ Y NI \ ~ W ~, _. ~ N ~_ ,a ~ ~ ~ f ~_ I = ~ l = 1 I I I I r ~ I ~, I hl I W I N a / I a I ` \ .. ,~ I i I I ` i I \ ~ . ~~~ **This project has already been designed by Roanoke County's Utility Department. Forward all information to Gary Robertson. ROAHOZCE COIINTY DTILITY DEPARTHBNT ~~ APPLICATION FOR ~+'ATER OR SEWER SERVICE v TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date May 24, 1994 Name of Applicant Han QVers Direct /Domestic ations Phone 977-7777 Address of Applicant 1 Avert/ Row Roanoke , Virg inia 24012 Name of Developer Game Phone Address of Developer_ Name of Design Engineer Horner and Assoc. Phone 989-9655 Address of Design Engineer 2721 Brambleton Avenue SW Roanoke VA 24019 Name of Contact Person Brian T. Duncan Name of Proposed Development Domestications distribution facility '~="' Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Construction of 530,000 s uare foot distribution facilit Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP P.ND PLPNILfETRIC NL~IIEP.): Hollins Road Size of proposed development in acres: 56 Acres*Includes the ' 2.76 acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum Finished floor elevation will be 1,046.5' f e e t MS L Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No .~ If yeS, provide map of entire area if available. v Yes (OVER) ~,,, Agent. Signat re of Applican t /~• ~ i . ~ •\ ~• \.\~ "_e:''`: ~ /`\\%G' 'CALLEGE // ~b~~r.~a163 . .8 ~ ~0' i..`• ~ 1 °a~~ ~ / / '.~ ~ f of ~ /~~~~ \ !-\''4 i \ \t:~•%_~ ~ ~'?~/ r /.' r~~ / a i~ ~ \ . :, j~ ~, •~ ' ~ .~,.t \~.1 .'f-!r~ , ~'~ ~% ~em i~~ u• I„ '- ~ ~ij l' '~'C.:~ ~ , .J ~\ i ~ V 0 ~~ .• ~~ r~ yy i'~ -\ ~~136 i \~ \ ~~~\ o_ 11 _-~ i~ ,/~~ ~/ i :~=" '/75/K, y\ _ .. '~~ ,~~~?- ` ~ \~~'`•~ ;mil i~ ~ L 1 \ ui_e\;~:,~ ,:Enon/ "1i, ~ \ , ~ '~ ~ .J ~ 1?'. j I' ( (r-_ ,1 ~ \ Q~~> , ~ 14\ 1I5 ~ . (tom ~/_"`J.. ~ ~•'. ~ } ~ f r (~` 'l55 ~ 1C'~ 1 1'fy~•~- ~ - ' ~~~ '/. ~ ^ ~-r J ~- \ tom' ~ :~ :fir' (/~~3~.• '.70~~~\/':~'%•~°~~•~~' -~:' ~~~ ''~~ 's~ /~• first ~ ~~.1`\ r Dr \ r, '' ~ 6 / JV _~fhea•~\ •. ~?~;,• IC10oJ, ~ ~(: ~•:.-~.V.l ' ~• 1 /~ °a r ! - .~ / •.y• ~' s; niliva'~ ~ 1. ~• • \ f ~ :.c:'~ ~•1;~.~;'•:~_~ I , i; ,~••;. \ ~~ .~/.~~=~ ~.; ~ nisi \;• : % a\~~~~ `~~ • - ~ ~ ~• ul 1~. ~~o ?"\ ,. \`'~.~y~...,• J fs//,~ ~ 1:. -\-/ 'i~" \~ ,;~~'~~ ~~ ~~,, o `goo , _ ~jl (, _ ~~ro~~sa-~ •1 %Oss ~~~.\:,~ I:j/r; ~~ollins~~'~'•~~ ~ ~ "~,`a'?~ "'~~ 2 ~ ~'' ~;~ '~'~~ 095_Sch~ll f • . i c ~ ~\ •"t~:• _• ~ . rte;, l„ 'f ~ la. •~ \..~C ~ ~ ~ \:`l~„~z,.~~ :`• • v'~~: • ~ u ,•'~.,,n~ , ! ~ ~: 1, ~. ~ (: ~-• ~\~ i .~. I ~ u e ant / ;~ , 1~, ~ i ; ~. ~;x ~ /~ r off; ,j\C~' ~ ~ ~ ~'~ 1~ ~,O /~ ~ /;. _ :~' - .~,~t- c , ~ t ,./:Pat r;u:~te oral ., t' / 1 `( 1~=~,~ ~ I M `_~~~' .~~ i~ \'`? eae~~s' ~~~ •~rr ^ : ter'-..~\~~ ~'~ l~ \ ~,~•,_~' O ~J •:~,: ~ • 111111'7`g~~ '~ '\• ,.~r`~ ~ "„ ,,~~~~'% : ~1_. !~:i~ ~. ~~"~i,; 1/, ~~ r ~ /~' J .w 62S ° °• ' 1 pl• 1.~= ~ ~`--G fog ;. _ r.: ~CO~ ., _ `' ~ ~. iii ~ r •~•• \ ~-~` ~ l~/. ~~ ;~~ I' '; • ~_ L .' I. ~ ~. :oO~\~o•~~••+~ae~~•. :~~•\• \'~ i^~ 1, rah ntaln Viet ~-- - If; -:•~ ~ ~~ \•i j j If 1~ r'y~•~~ \~ 71; ~ \. \~\ 1~~. ! ji'~ __ -tea •.fYl1 - ~; 6:5 '/ ~~"~: \~\ ,~rrf -. '~ .~. ~ .a: __ ~- :ice. /1 ~ ~ /// \ , _ r \ '• 1 - \~Y.~'\ ~\•. `' ;• • ~ ~ !'~~ ~, pis ~~ i 9 ' a o~ - . . r ~ '• ~ Crossroads..b)a ~ ( goo 'ao ' ~ J,~~Sh'oPPi IB Cgnter ~ ~ t~ ~ dam' .i ~/ ~ xff< s .>, „ ,~ ~% \\~ ~1, 't ~ o ~ ," FFF/// ~ : ~ i "T ~ o~ iiO~~vrr ~ ~ f ~ 1` (PR~I 1.~ < < ~ - 2 ~~`' _ iresto Par~~~ ~z V <jµg' ~\Q' aA o • ~Rlri~ m p ` d .,~ o pop A f 1~ p , / /C1\fLEM \~`~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~Brerkenr ~~ ~ c 1e • ~, o c,'' ~ d 11 ~. ;' <~r r -a/ . 9 O • Z G P;~ ~ ~. a t ~ \© \ \ z ~ e p ~6 0 . ~ ~? ` ~ ~, \ e ~ \ it O Z 0 t~ Oa ' nd \ ~ I , f,geh7~ \\ o VV ~ ~ A c `~~ ~` ~ col ~ V ~ s.-~ ~i "' 1 ` ! \`. .,: `•) ,115 / .~ _ ~'~•~ ~4 b ~ ~ ~ ::;.:::~~ r •~ •r \ '' ~~ v;.:...! :'~ a ~/• ~.'~ t~_ •:~ ~~~ %/ \ 11 ,~4. `l•` o `, ~ _ r. `~•` -='°'r Syil olf ~- Clburse. ~ ~ s, r., ~~ `' ~ ~ l 1"~~ %~ / \\-i''~Hotir \1 J'' ~;'OrO~}-2rvb/ '0001 ,~ • ~ ~ ~ . j ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~4. J O ~ ~'~~~~ ~ "~ J ~ J a° art -,,J `II\CO r=,-__ _ ~ ~ ~ '' M `~ ~ .,t,, ~. .,~ J" 1 C`/•.~ is ~ '~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date recei~~; ~~ received by: u-~f application fee~y' PC/BZA date{:~ /y~`' ti ) {'] placards issued: BOS date: Y t, ~: ~.~: l9S~f Case Numbe^ j i _ ~./~ , / is ine application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan / Application fee / Application ~~.: Metes and bounds description /,; A- ;.`: Proffers, if applicable ' Justification R•~ Water and sewer a lication Ad oinin PP j g property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the ner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and conser~.t-of`t~ner/~ ~ Owner's Signature: C ~/i .~ ~ ~ For Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant ~~. -~ Ili "~ 51 ~--fi-(i !~-~ ~~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. ~- 1 r ~~~ ~ti/Sc s v~~ ~s ~ L GC,~~^a ~. ~rt~~,,... i ~U ~ Ct ~ 2- i~ ~ f5-z5 l..c.,-z / ~ "~-2!l ~c..1 ~ l~~ l..ut~ ~;.~ c~. ~~Z~c,+ ~ . , . _. < I Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. i Y ~~ ~±r ~ ti ~ ~~ Of r % o ~ ,. ~ ~ o / :~ - • ~ ~ ~ g ', o 4 / ~•. ~ • Lr ~' • ~ /• ~ ~.o . ~/ -~~ 4.9~~,.~~~~'~' ~0- ~ ~' ANN w ' 'C~ ~ G~. 3 _ .c' Z .•.•~. \ %~ •~ ~ o •~ ~~ OLS~ f J ~ \ • ~ O ~1 -"t~ ` ,~ ~ . ,~ p`~',~~3 i • ~'0' 69 t '~ -~ a - . ~~ °p ~ - ~i~ ~ _. ~ v L ~ 1 V. t~~V $° a ~~ ~, ~~ ~' b LS 4< ~° c /' • , Y,,=~u~ ~~i ~~i ~ ~, app . ~ Q ~ .~ .~ ~~ / o . ,~, N 1'• ~'~~ ~ -Y 0 a NORTH / ~~ 1. - - -- ~ ' -- / 1 t !/ / ~' ` S« Mop 34.1)4 / 1^• 200' 48 47 ~ 45 ~ 23.60 Ac KIJ 9 a~ ~D 1 tu/ 64 ` / p ~ ` p R1. I ~a ~~ x M 7M 000 / ~O -'p 91 . ~ • , ~ As / ~41i 44 L74A D} u s ~ 22. 31St/ ~~~ rw LS~Aa C) ~Olc N 33 4.su 2.29A ;o~ II/f ~..~ Do 41 III ~ ) Gam 13 4 Co ` .00 e 3.TiAc g4 1 • ~~ ` ~ss~ !~ \ , . . SN Map 64.02 1° • 200' ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ° ~S ' pj'c 09AC lDi 62 Ac tG \ y .9GAt ` ' IC) \ ` X11 ~~ I ~ I I I See flap 6444 43 22.64 Ac "(~YJ~ ~3.1~ 7.41 Ac IOA' w I/C IOIf t mss, 43.2 '~:3 3.16 Ae 43.4 8.03 Ae ~ 5 7.77Ac 8.48 Ac ~ ~~ ~ O 38 3521 Ac (0) 3B 63 Ae tC) Spa Map 3503 1' • 200' ~^"'04 ~~ n. l~ ` S94 Ae ~ j */is 43.8 S76 Ac / ~/rl 43.9 703 Ae / •/JS 4310 ~ 9.01 Ac p - y ass 43.11 14.99 Ae ~~ I 8 Ac ~+ I 39 • 4313 42.31 Ae Rr 2L16 Ac 9 12.9 / •• 200' ~ ~ 37 / /aa \ a7.63 Ac ~•. t \-, ya `. -~ _ _ ~~ * DEPARTI~NT OF PLANNING ~/TiO~/~R; MoNA S. Si.'TPH!~ < AND ZONING T/~X MAP NCM/3ER.' (~~~ 00 - 2 - ~3, (o .,, SPEC/AL. LASE I'E,~'N//T PJP~ /ATF ~itBLE I I ' 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-5 EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF BOOTHE AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANORE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS WHEREAS, Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV and the County of Roanoke for the renewal of this franchise agreement as of June 30, 1994, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently prior to such date to permit adoption by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on or about June 30, 1994; and WHEREAS, Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading of and public hearing for this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after June 30, 1994, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Salem Cable TV, the franchise of Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on July 1, 1994, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement between Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF BOOTHE AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : i/~~~-~~ti •/ BACKGROUND' The original franchise agreement between the County of Roanoke and Boothe American Company doing business as Salem Cable TV was enacted in May of 1979 with an effective date of June 29, 1979. The term of this franchise agreement was for 15 years from the date that Salem Cable TV received authorization from the F.C.C. to operate a cable television system within the portions of Roanoke County adjoining the City of Salem. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Negotiations are currently under way between a committee appointed for this purpose by this board and representative of Boothe American Company d/b/a/ Salem Cable TV. The County Attorney's Office has presented to their representative a detailed outline of the critical issues which must be addressed in a new franchise agreement. The County is currently awaiting a response from Boothe American Company on these issues. All issues directly parallel provisions currently contained in the County's franchise agreement with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. Conclusion of an agreement on the terms of a new franchise agreement have been delayed because of the exceptional demands created by the recent cable rate regulations issued by the F.C.C. over the past several months. It is anticipated that negotiations will conclude by the end of August in order to permit the Board of Supervisors to consider and act on a new franchise agreement by the end of September, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT' ~~I None at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, • C~~~~Z~~~Q~~ Jos ph B. Obenshain Senior Assistant County Attorney ------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke to Minnix Nickens $~l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF BOOTHE AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS WHEREAS, Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV and the County of Roanoke for the renewal of this franchise agreement as of June 30, 1994, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently prior to such date to permit adoption by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on or about June 30, 1994; and WHEREAS, Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading of and public hearing for this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after ~~ June 30, 1994, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Salem Cable TV, the franchise of Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on July 1, 1994, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement between Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-6 AUTHORI2ATING THE ACQUISITION OF NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE HOLLINS ROAD WATER LINE EXTENSION WHEREAS, location plans for the Hollins Road Water Line project are being completed and the project will requires acquisition of easements across certain properties; and, WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the water line project; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading was held on June 28, 1994. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary easements for the Hollins Road Water Line Extension are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition 28.13-1-23.7 28.13-1-24 28.13-1-25 28.13-1-25.1 28.13-1-26 28.13-1-27 28.13-1-27.2 28.13-1-27.3 28.13-1-28 28.13-1-29 28.17-1-1 28.17-1-2 Payne, Ronald L. & Linda D. Shelton, Olivene W. Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Barton, William R. & Betty L. Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors AMP Incorporated Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. All, Maurice C. & Juanita G. Dogan, Robert H. & Frankie M. Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement 28.17-1-3 Halsey, Henry C. & Peggy Lou Easement 28.17-1-4 Matthews, Henry M. & Maxine Easement 28.17-1-5 Patterson Memorial (Grace) Easement 28.17-2-9 Wray, Frank T. & Mamie Easement 28.17-2-11 Holdren, Michael S. & Brenda A. Easement 28.17-2-14 Sweet, Ricky L. Easement 28.17-2-10 Turner, Roy T. & Lorene W. Easement 28.17-2-12 Chumbley, James R. & Margaret G. Easement 28.17-2-13 Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement 28.17-2-15 Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement 38.16-1-3.1 Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement 38.16-1-3.2 Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement 38.16-1-3.3 CBL Plantation Plaza (Food Lion) Easement 38.16-1-3.4 Central Fidelity Bank Easement 38.16-1-3.5 CBL Plantation Plaza, Ltd. Easement 39.05-1-2 Smith, Ellen Lurene Stanley Easement 39.05-1-3 Leslie, Frances Stanley & R. Co. Easement 39.05-1-4 Reid, Maurice W. Easement 39.05-1-9 Seventh Day Adventist Reform Easement 39.05-1-10 Reformation Herald Publishing Easement 39.05-1-12 Noell, Ronnie D. & Karen S. Easement 39.05-1-13 Kelley, Robert E. & Robin C. Easement 39.05-1-13.1 Noell, Ronnie D. & Karen S. Easement 39.09-1-1 Friendship Manor Apt. Village Easement 39.09-1-2 Friendship Manor Apt. Village Easement 39.09-1-4 Anglin, Adrian L. Jr. & Debra G. Easement 39.09-1-4.1 Anglin, Adrian L. Jr. & Debra G. Easement 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40% of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the Hanover Direct project funds; and, 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: y"Yt~'~'c~, ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing the Acquitions of Necessary Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : /,~~ ~ /' ~~ BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors has approved the Hollins Road Water Line project along with the appropriate funding as part of the Hanover Direct project. The above project will involve acquisition of approximately 39 easements. In order to secure the required properties in a timely manner, staff is submitting a list of affected properties for approval by the Board. A map of the area is attached. The following is a list of properties involved: TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER 28.13-01-23.7 PAYNE, RONALD L. & LINDA D. 28.13-01-24 SHELTON, OLIVENE W. 28.13-01-25 HARDIE, JAMES W. & PAMELA C. 28.13-01-25.1 HARDIE, JAMES W. & PAMELA C. 28.13-01-26 BARYON, WILLIAM R. & BETTY L. 28.13-01-27 ROANOKE CO. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 28.13-01-27.2 AMP INCORPORATED 28.13-01-27.3 SHIMCHOCK'S LITHO SERVICE, INC. 28.13-01-28 NININGER, CHARLES L. & GLADYS A. 28.13-01-29 NININGER, CHARLES L. & GLADYS A. 28.17-01-01 ALL, MAURICE C. & JUANITA G. 28.17-01-02 DOGAN, ROBERT H. & FRANKIE M. 28.17-01-03 HALSEY, HENRY C. & PEGGY LOU 28.17-01-04 MATTHEWS, HENRY M. & MAXINE 28.17-O1-05 PATTERSON MEMORIAL (GRACE) 28.17-02-09 WRAY, FRANK T. & MAMIE 28.17-02-11 HOLDREN, MICHAEL S. & BRENDA A. 28.17-02-14 SWEET, RICKY L. 28.17-02-10 TURNER, ROY T. & LORENE W. 28.17-02-12 CHUMBLEY, JAMES R. & MARGARET G. 28.17-02-13 SWEET, RALEIGH T. & FRANCES P. 28.17-02-15 SWEET, RALEIGH T. & FRANCES P. 38.16-O1-03.1 DOMINION TRUST CO & M. E. HINMAN 38.16-01-03.2 DOMINION TRUST CO & M. E. HINMAN 38.16-01-03.3 CBL PLANTATION PLAZA (FOOD LION) Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement ~~ TAX MAP NO. 38.16-01-03.4 38.16-01-03.5 39.05-O1-02 39.05-01-03 39.05-01-04 39.05-01-09 39.05-01-10 39.05-O1-12 39.05-01-13 39.05-01-13.1 39.09-01-01 39.09-01-02 39.09-01-04 39.09-01-04.1 PROPERTY OWNER CENTRAL FIDELITY BANK CBL PLANTATION PLAZA, LTD. SMITH, ELLEN LURENE STANLEY LESLIE, FRANCES STANLEY & R. CO. REID, MAURICE W. SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST REFORM REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING NOELL, RONNIE D. & KAREN S. KELLEY, ROBERT E. & ROBIN C. NOELL, RONNIE D. & KAREN S. FRIENDSHIP MANOR APT. VILLAGE FRIENDSHIP MANOR APT. VILLAGE ANGLIN, ADRIAN L. JR. & DEBRA G. ANGLIN, ADRIAN L. JR., & DEBRA G. ACQUISITION Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement Staff would recommend that the payment for acquisition of easements be in an amount negotiated with the property owner not to exceed 40$ of assessed value of the land plus any actual damage to improvements as established by County assessment records or an appraisal made by an independent appraiser retained by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The cost of easement acquisition is included as part of the overall project budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the first reading of an Ordinance authorizing acquisition of easements at a cost not to exceed 40~ of the assessed value plus cost of actual damage to improvements as established by County assessment records or an appraiser retained by the County as needed for the Water Line Extension to serve Hanover Direct. SUBMITTED BY: Motion by: Gary Robertson, P.E. Elmer C. H dge Utility Director County Administrator Approved Denied Received Ref erred to APPROVED: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZATING THE ACQUISITION OF NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE HOLLINS ROAD WATER LINE EXTENSION WHEREAS, location plans for the Hollins Road Water Line project are being completed and the project will requires acquisition of easements across certain properties; and, WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the water line project; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading was held on June 28, 1994. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary easements for the Hollins Road Water Line Extension are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition 28.13-1-23.7 28.13-1-24 28.13-1-25 28.13-1-25.1 28.13-1-26 28.13-1-27 28.13-1-27.2 28.13-1-27.3 28.13-1-28 28.13-1-29 28.17-1-1 28.17-1-2 28.17-1-3 28.17-1-4 28.17-1-5 28.17-2-9 Payne, Ronald L. & Linda D. Easement Shelton, Olivene W. Easement Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Easement Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Easement Barton, William R. & Betty L. Easement Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors Easement AMP Incorporated Easement Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. Easement Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. Easement Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. Easement All, Maurice C. & Juanita G. Easement Dogan, Robert H. & Frankie M. Easement Halsey, Henry C. & Peggy Lou Easement Matthews, Henry M. & Maxine Easement Patterson Memorial (Grace) Easement Wray, Frank T. & M amie Easement 28.17-2-11 ' 28.17-2-14 28.17-2-10 28.17-2-12 28.17-2-13 28.17-2-15 38.16-1-3.1 38.16-1-3.2 38.16-1-3.3 38.16-1-3.4 38.16-1-3.5 39.05-1-2 39.05-1-3 39.05-1-4 39.05-1-9 39.05-1-10 39.05-1-12 39.05-1-13 39.05-1-13.1 39.09-1-1 39.09-1-2 39.09-1-4 39.09-1-4.1 Holdren, Michael S. & Brenda A. Easement Sweet, Ricky L. Easement Turner, Roy T. & Lorene W. Easement Chumbley, James R. & Margaret G. Easement Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement CBL Plantation Plaza (Food Lion) Easement Central Fidelity Bank Easement CBL Plantation Plaza, Ltd. Easement Smith, Ellen Lurene Stanley Easement Leslie, Frances Stanley & R. Co. Easement Reid, Maurice W. Easement Seventh Day Adventist Reform Easement Reformation Herald Publishing Easement Noell, Ronnie D. & Karen S. Easement Kelley, Robert E. & Robin C. Easement Noell, Ronnie D. & Karen S. Easement Friendship Manor Apt. Village Easement Friendship Manor Apt. Village Easement Anglin, Adrian L. Jr. & Debra G. Easement Anglin, Adrian L. Jr. & Debra G. Easement 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40% of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the Hanover Direct project funds; and, 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp5 ] \doc\agenda\realest\hollins r-~, 2 ,.-~ -~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-7 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 86.01-2-15 LOCATED OFF HOMEWOOD CIRCLE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is hereby declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on June 14, 1994; and a second reading was held on June 28, 1994, concerning the sale and disposition of a parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of Brian Wilson to purchase this property for $100 and removal of well and reservoir per letter dated April 28, 1994 is hereby accepted~e~-ee~ee~; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital projects fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance accepting offer of Brian Wilson for $100 and removal of well and reservoir per letter dated April 28, 1994, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John D. Willey, Property Manager Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 6129 Homewood Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 April 28, 1994 Mr. John D. Willey Department of Property Management P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear John: Per our conversation earlier this week, I would like to submit a bid to purchase the reservoir lot immediately adjacent to the property of my personal residence. The lot's tax map number is 86.01-2-15. It is .06 acres and currently has a reservoir on it which was used to store the community water supply. However, it is no longer used for this purpose and I would like to have the structure removed. As we discussed, I am willing to have the lot surveyed and incorporated into my current personal property. I would like to submit a bid of $100 for the property plus the cost of the reservoir removal, survey and all associated recording costs. You can contact me at 772-0500 during the day or at 774-1375 during the evening. Si y, ~~ nan V. Wilson ACTION NO. ITEM NO . .~4~ "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 86.01-2-15 LOCATED OFF HOMEWOOD CIRCLE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /' ~ /~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is requesting that the Board declare a parcel of real estate located off Homewood Circle in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and identified as Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15 to be surplus property and to adopt at second reading an ordinance authorizing the sale of this property. FISCAL IMPACTS• The proceeds from the sale of this surplus property shall be paid into the capital projects fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board declare Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15 to be surplus property, and to adopt at second reading an ordinance authorizing the sale of this property. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn D. Willey Elmer C. Hodge Property Manager County Administrator 1 Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs a\wp5 ] \agenda\reales[\homewood ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAX MAP NO. 86.01-2-15 LOCATED OFF HOMEWOOD CIRCLE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS DIS- TRICT TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING/REJECTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is hereby declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on June 14, 1994; and a second reading was held on June 28, 1994, concerning the sale and disposition of a parcel of real estate identified as Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of property for accepted/rejected; and is hereby 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital projects fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp5] \agenda\realest\homewood.ord to purchase this ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RO COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION ANOKE CENTER MEETING DATE• June 28, 1994 SUB_ JECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Four-year term of William G. Rosebro, Medical Representative, will expire June 30, 1994. has advised that he does not wish to serve an therRtermro 2. Four-year term of Monty Plymale will expire June 30, 1994. Mr. Plymale has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~. ~ ~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Motion byACTION VOTE Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~¢ . ;~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 28, 1994, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Appropriation of Surplus Federal Revenues to Cover Jail Operations Due to Increased Inmate Population. 3. Appropriation of Compensation Board Reimbursement for Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer. 4. Request for Acceptance of Extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the VDOT Secondary System. 5. Donation of Water Line Easement on Lot 7, Block 1, Section 7, Nottingham Hills from Charles R. Simpson, Inc. 6. Confirmation of Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility A-62894-8.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the June 14, 1994 meeting. 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Supervisor Eddy nominated Richard Evans to serve another four- year term as an alternate member. His term will expire July 25, 1998. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, `~'7 ~~ .~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals File A-62894-8.b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING O E ROANO DCOUNTY ADMIONISTRATI N CENTER ~~ VIRGINIA HELD AT TH MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of surplus federal revenues to cover Jail operations due to increased inmate population for FY 1993-94. i COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~ ot,~~ir~'~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During FY 1993-94, the inmate population at the Roanoke County Jail has increased dramatically. As a result, operational costs such as food, utilities, medical costs, etc. have risen proportionally with the population increase. After reviewing the Sheriff syear-to-date expenditures, ayear-end deficit of $48,500 is projected as follows: Administration $13,688 Civil 16,400 Care and Confinement 78 588 Total $(48,500) Roanoke County is reimbursed for housing both state and federal prisoners. The state reimburses at a rate of $6 and $8/day while federal prisoners are reimbursed at $40/day. Federal prisoner reimbursement revenue for FY93-94 was budgeted at $50,000. As of June 20, 1994 approximately $101,000 has been received from the federal government for housing their prisoners, generating a surplus in this category of $51,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation adjustment to recognize an additional $50,000 of revenue for housing federal prisoners and increasing the Care and Confinement budget within the Sheriff s department by $50,000 to cover increased operational costs of the jail caused by increased inmate population. Respectfully submitted,----- W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager I-~ Approv by, r,, ~~~ lmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ~ Motion by: ~i, ode > > Minnix No Yes Abs Eddy x - Denied () Johnson x Received () - x Kohinke _ - Referred () Minnix x To () Nickens _ x - cc: File W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Gerald Holt, Sheriff A-62894-8.c ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for capital purchases for the Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ - .~-~`~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During FY 1993-94, the Compensation Board solicited requests from local Constitutional Officers for reimbursement of office automation equipment expenditures made during the fiscal year. Additional funds became available for distribution to the localities to upgrade computer capabilities. The Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer requested reimbursement for equipment (data processing equipment), subject to requirements set by the Comp Board and had funds approved as follows: Commonwealth's Attorney $2,251 Treasurer 673 The Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer have submitted requests for reimbursement of the approved funds. The Sheriff had made a similar request for reimbursement from the Comp Board and had funds approved in the amount of $2,285. The Board of Supervisors appropriated these funds at an earlier meeting this spring. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Approval of this request will increase revenue and expenditure budgets by equal amounts--$2,924. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation adjustment to increase revenues from the state for Compensation Board reimbursement by $2,924 and to increase the Treasurer's budget by $673 and the Commonwealth's Attorney's budget by $2,251. Respectfully submitted, ~- ~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager ~~ Approve by, ~ ~1~ a Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: g n~a o, , Minnix No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ x _ Received () Johnson _ x _ Referred () Kohinke _ X _ To () Minnix _ x _ Nickens x cc: File W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Skip Burkart, Commonwealth 's Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer c THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 28th DAY OF JUNE, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62894-8.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF EXTENSION OF FOX RIDGE ROAD AND FOX DEN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Re irements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Re irements and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and an easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and y necessary BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Su ervisors Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Eddv Nays: None A Copy Teste: ---- ~°' Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 62894-8.d requesting acceptance of Extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, June 28, 1994. ~-, ' l Mary H Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1 X _.. ._~ S7aRKEr S7a7roN CCI. ...`,i\ ~~ h\,.~/ ei GOLF V o V9 L ~ ., 00~ l 1\, /I --si~C rto r''~,: _ y y -. ~ ~' ~ 679 / e ` VICINITY 1I7AP•w•~t~--% - i' / ~ ^ ~. B 1rM 7 ,,, ~~a+o \ p~~ ~ /!~ / `\, s ~ / 1JV ~ `~~/"' fiV / . ~'~~. j:: 19 -.._ . _ _ A+ « \ _ 'O + \ as u 4 a~ e3 `~ '.' tea. s.ro 1764 1744 N a+.+r ~ t e2 - Loi4 sa • ~ u14, vs ~ y nw n.v sr7u ,,,, s.ll w+ rrn a>« U• 7w ~ Fa w dV+ Rom YH ~ 3+y trr+ ~ . e2s ''"' ».. +lar f aeo ate 1.034 e.IS/ _ e23 e22 e21 ~ e2o i + i :~. ~ Y ae e:a ! . q-~ ~ e.le,YIO O ' 1 ~ ~ ~ 3iR 4 4r dr1 e.M t e.IT 4 1 s * +.• PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Fox Ridge Road: From the intersection of Silver F the end (cul-de-sac). ox Road to LENGTH: (1) 0 23 RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 MILES (2) 0.09 MILES ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET {2) 50 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET {2) 30 FEET SERVICE: (1) 9 HOMES (2) 20 FEET • { 2) 3 HOMES 2) Fox Den Road: From the intersection of Fox Ridge Road to the end {cul-de-sac). ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF THE EXTENSION OF FOX RID ENGINEERING & AND FOX DEN'ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTOOD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION SEEONDARY SYSTEM 4 l . ~ ~ w~ o ~ ~" o ~ ~ .~ A H z A U ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ w a ~ ~ ~ O -`~ a 0 y~ a M N •~ ~, ~W v i~ ~ ~ I o ,-a x O co ~ G . r., ^ c .-. x z o =° o U ~ w v ~ H z z ~ l ~~ ~ ~ M U ~ qA cu `~ U O x a v x O ro 0 x !~ ~„ o~ ae o k ~ 0 ~`'' ~ b ~ CO G v rn ro ~ ~ ..~ ~ ,n N y ~ w O ^ a ~ '~ M z ~ ~ ,~ O ~ ~ ~ N .,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ +g as u F"' v ~ ~ A N ~ ~ rn v °' ~ ^ 01 ~ x ~ O 4! H ,~ ~ .~ o c O as b >~ ro ~ ~ 0 a ' te O a , a b ro 0 x v o b •.a z ~ 0 w '" ~ rn O 0 0 ,~ rn x °p rn x 0 w ~ ~ N O G ~ G ~ v v "~ ~ u v ~' I A ~ N ~ y ~ H I b o x ~ o 0 .. _e _ ~ Q. b 0 x /r N A 0 w ~- O m .~ ti b b a 4 .. o b o _b A .~ ~., a m O b ~ ~ m o v a ~ ~ ~ w V O A ,,, o ~ ao ad C a ~'+ H 4i O ~ ti m ~ a~ !~ ~ 'd m V H ~ m ~ m V -,,, _~ R ~r.1 M ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ V F+ .~ ~ .~ ~ 9 o m b H z 'C! Q o z ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~,'~z~"~~,~x~' ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Old Heritage Corporation, the developer of Hunting Hills, Section 23 Subdivision, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept an extension of 0.23 miles of Fox Ridge Road and 0.09 miles of Fox Den Road to their respective cul-de- sacs. The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and found these roads acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No County funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requesting that they accept the extension of Fox Ridge Road and Fox Den Road into the Secondary Road System. --..._ , CNU,N~N6L~ ~ NLOLF '' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ roasc~-P I JJ g^ `\ ~ Ro 1 'ION ~ :~_ i"rr,y,KAND OR Q~ 1.,~. ~ 0~ ~tl i~1s~ `^ \l' J1f ,.b 5 ~ R ~ HUNTING ~~qg~' use 4 S`~o INt' ~`$ ~'' ~°qr~~ a~oF,FJ ~P Zt41N OF R Pt ~N j; ~ ' C - I ~ - ~ ~ 'Y ti - 679 ! cue 9 O ~S~s_~.---_ I VICINITY ,MAP•w ~~°~ -~~ ~°~ ,,.. S„ ~ LM f, ~ . / mu " ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~f~~/ s>1 ~ ti~~ • • . 1',100' ~ » ~ . ~ ~7rao 20 , ,.l/, \ ._~. _ ~ b~ ; ` • __ ,, v ~ ' ~ Y„ ~,,, e.io ~/ , - ~ 64 f e} r ••• L7 Ae W6.Y 174m ~ +e se - 1.oxA. YA s2 Lxi ne O ~ +„ In OM Y7u Yts a~ ue~ aw Y YN j ! Fw da • RooO - . ~p OO s • 9k Yl1 S•K 8t0I .. 1 ~ ~'~ ! ~.~9 s 024 ' LoiA~ e23 s2z s ; sz1 ~ szo = • ~ Q Ob 0.q • ti q•• r ~~ tl! • YM O ~ ~, ~ I 1 •, ' rn ~ r as Yr~ a •~ 1 13.1 1 ]~~ 4 ' i.n ,^„ ~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Fox Ridge Road: From the intersection of Silver .Fox Road to the end (cul-de-sac). , LENGTH: (1) 0.23 MILES (2) 0.09 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET (2) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET (2) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET (2) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 9 HOMES (2) 3 HOMES 2) Fox Den Road: From the intersection of Fox Ridge Road to the end (cul-de-sac). ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF THE EXTENSION OF FOX RIDGE ROAD ENGINEERING & AND FOX DEN'ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 4 A-62894-8.e ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of water line easement on Lot 7, Block 1, Section 7, Nottingham Hills, from Charles R. Simpson, Inc., to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~ ~~ ~~ U" SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement to the Board of Supervisors for water line purposes in connection with relocation of an existing six-inch water line upon and across Lot 7, Block 1, Section 7, Nottingham Hills, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a water line easement, twenty (20') feet in width, from Charles R. Simpson, Inc., (Deed Book 1028, page 429, Plat Book 9, page 75) (Tax Map No. 76.19-03-08) as shown on a plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, dated January 13, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Respectfully submitted, V~ick~.e L. Hu an` Assistant Cou ty Attorney K- 5 Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by H ~.dPll Minnix cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Nickens x Minnix x Attorney & Inspections NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ZONE "X" AS SHOWN ON THE FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS BASED ON SAID MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. 0 ~h p ~~ ~ 2 N ~2 CONNECT TO EXIST. 6" TRANSITE STONE WALLS LOT 8 2~S ~, FR 8~ ~~ LOT 7 O~Ae 9 , B L. 1 Ac ~S NEW 20 WATERLINE EASEMENT Z ~~,~ ~ ~6,, EXIST. 6" TRANSITE PIPE i\ c~~~ TO 8E RELOCATED O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,/ ti o ~ ZO ~ ~ ~' a+ I ~~ ~/ ~'1 ?. / r NEW 6' DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE R\W CURVE DATA R = 50.00' T = 40.44' L = 68.01' CH= S 06'44'44" W 62.89' L=68.0 ~ 10'x15 v G.A.E. V ~~ ~o QQ ~~ 5y F 0 ~, F. CONNECT ~pp TO EXIST. 6' TRANSITE ~ ~~` LOT 6 _ NEW 6' DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE ~~a~ 1-13-94 M JOHN 7. PiQiKER - EASEMENT PLAT FOR CHARLES R. SiMPSON, INC. SHOWING A 20' WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT THRU LOT 7, BLOCK 1, SEC.7 NOTTINGHAM HILLS P.B. 9. PG. 75 ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA TPPB~S T. P. Pax~>tz & SON E.N OINEER3 Ble Ho~il,~ard SURVEYORS lit ~~ BOZ S9 PLANNERS S!1lm, VSr~SIIll $4168 N /~Qa~ O ^~ ~~~ /~ i A-62894-8.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ^-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Comprehensive Services Act for At Risk Youth and their Families became effective July 1, 1993 and requires each community to have a Community Policy and Management Team (C.P.M.T.) comprised heads of certain agencies specified in the legislation and two parent representatives. The parent representatives must have children who are participating in one of the programs covered under the act which includes those of special education, foster care, youth and family services, etc. The term of Jerry Canada expires June 30, 1994 and he is not eligible for reappointment. The School system nominated and the C.P.M.T. has recommended the name of Mrs. Ann Latstetter of 6399 Christie Lane, Roanoke, Va. to begin a two year term effective July 1, 1994. The Board of Supervisors is asked to confirm this appointment at your June 28 meeting. RECOMMENDATION' The C.P.M.T. respectfully requests the Board appointment of Mrs. Latstetter to begin service on the Team effective July 1, 1994. Respectfully submitted, Approved by,,~ John M. Chambl ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE Motion by: u_ n~Pll M;nn;x No Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Community Policy and Management Team File /1/-1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Audited) Original 1993-94 Budget Addition to reserve August 24, 1993 VDOT Revenue Sharing Match October 26, 1993 Purchase of ladder truck January 3, 1994 IDA -acquire 15 acres from Friendship Manor January 11, 1994 IDA donation -balance of land acquisition from Friendship Manor and water line installation January 11, 1994 January 25, 1994 January 25, 1994 IDA donation -Jack Smith Park land acquisition Purchase of 2 Knuckle Booms General Services Supplemental Allocation Balance at June 28, 1994 Amount $6,936,009 80,668 (25,000) (203,733) (272,500) (190,000) (99,189) (132,600) 400 000 5 693 655 of General Fund Expenditures 7.4% Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($77,411,447). /~/- ~. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1993 (Audited) $136,635 July 13, 1993 Northside High School Ball Fields (62,000) January 25, 1994 Environmental Assessment Work - Pinkard Court (2,600) April 12, 1994 Cave Spring High School Restrootn/Concession Stand (22,000) May 24, 1994 Explore Park -Well and Septic System (7,500) June 14, 1994 Parks and Recreation Matching Funds 42 535 Balance as of June 28, 1994 $ 0 Submittedy by ~~~ ~ . ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~r COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Original 1993-1994 Budget $100,000 July 13, 1993 Clerk of Circuit Court New Position (26,400) October 26, 1993 Codification of County Code (6,500) February 22, 1994 Fire and Rescue Vehicle Replacement Study (12,500) April 16, 1994 Consultant for Energy Management System (8,450) May 10, 1994 Printing of Citizen Handbook (5,190) May 10, 1994 Democratic Primary Election 18 055 Balance as of June 28, 1994 22 905 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N-y ~ 07 M O N N N In tb a W N M N p O M B N O O n m ro O M O a n N o n n n 00 ~ O ID N ~ n M ~ N N a O ~- ~ m N M M N M n N M a oo N ~ N N '- M l[) N N N O ~ l0 ~ 1D N N n ~ M OD fO n n ~ p M ~ r n n eo (O a GO N N N O N O1 ro a M n n 07 A !b N p fp tD a ~- W o t0 a IO a ~ Z N N A M to a M a p ~ M N O ~ .- ~ N ~ a M N N O a ~ fD N M .- Q? ~ M N ~ M M n e- a M n a n N QI O zo O H O a 0 ~ a O N a N M t0 N r~ O O O O O O a° n ~ a o W a N N N M O a 1I7 .- M o a o _.... N N '- N O1 ~ a M ~ N m T ui n tp z... a a M IA W a ~ In a ~ n u7 N N E M n fG N 07 n N 00 O O M o O O O Q ~ M a p M N~ O .- a; N to ~ M O O p F, ~ •- ~ •- .- ~ o .- of ao n Q Z : n i1I to n N ~ .- ul N ~ O aD a m a fD n N .- M 07 N n n O O In o O O n o Y Y M N ~ in to O a 0 N N O IA a N M O O ~ W ~ O ~ O ~ M O n ~ tD r 00 n n n ~ m U n N W a N N 07 lD r M N n to G N a N ID O d a N N a O O OD o N (0 a o z. W ~ ~ N 1t7 117 0 M In N ~ O N N O O O '- M Q ~ .- a a r N ~- M <n r O N r O co a Vl .- Q - U ~ W ul ^ n M 07 i11 n f0 n of O a fG N N ao In aD 10 N O O f0 o Of a n o y H M a O W a O M N N a M 0 M M f a M M O M M N N ^ a M O M r tD N Ct. ~ ~ 0 N 01 M M a ro 00 m ro p e- O W W J z M a a M n cD In !p n N O1 l0 N n M ~ N 1n N N O N N W O O a o OO M M O Q O a N N N a O a ^ M M In O N M O O O ~. Z ~ a a a ~ N O O N n ~ m ~ ~ ri Cp O W z 0] ~ O X a n N !n ~ "' W ~ 117 07 N n N n 07 '- M O n 00 00 Ilf N N o O O 07 ~ ~ ~ ~ '- M N a M 0 r- a O M N ~ N M 10 a tO M ~ n .- O ~ ~ ~- O N O N O O r W N n fD f0 Q' W J U H {- Z.. n r tD ~ OD ~"' 07 N N N a a N ~ M a l0 N 1[1 M ~ M M a M n 117 M OD OD l0 O M r N O1 N O O f0 o fD M N z Q M a a N ~ M OD a 0 IA O S O X 0 0 O ~ to n N ~ ~ a o C C G J a' N m n V^~ ~ n DD M ~ a N M M a N N r• .- N N N N O M O IA N ~ M a 0 O O a o0 ~~^ 0 ,Z ~ N N N O r N r lp N n M 00 (D n n 0 ~ ~ J ~.I 00 a O~ N N a N N a N M O O O O O O OD N 00 a m ^ O O O o ID N~ a° M of ai o N M ri ui a s ai v M a ui v 11i O M n ai ,- H a c~ W (~ ? eo a s ao N (D 1(1 a n N N Op ^ ~ N '- M A N N '- O ao n N A M M m M a ~- N M N a M^ O O a o ~- w oe . ?. ~o ~~ ~ M N~ M ID a 0 a n acc ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~; U a Z'.. F., a n M 00 .- ro m a n 0 0 0 M N r a m O1 a O '- M M O O M a° r m o Z. - ~ n ~ '- O N M O M z ~ ~ M N O ~ ~n Iri nmm 7 ~ U x w ~ 5 m W; f- ¢ U tb ~ ~ W'Z ~Q m ~ ti '. 7Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V O z (~/ `' 2 ~-~ut ~ ~ h gz ? ~ ~rAd ~ Qd'. w . ~ ~ c Q~IK ~ Z Q~O Z W rtp -mot O. ~ U1~ ~~~~ ~ F-µ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w CYZU bCC r.. .+usi ~~ '4~1 d' Q q YY- . v7~ cnyY~ ,_ ~ HVY t(~ ~ U~ S>~ W? ~ Y• but y :'i 02ut~ Q4~n. Q~2: ~ p 6 ~ , , ~Z N ZaZ „ j ~D-s~D ~p "' DQ , d art urd ~ 2Z ~ - U2~ U2 W= v w ~ iu Z Q O O Y a -S m: 4 rD ~ . . 4# U 7t ~trsQ tli ~,Ii »~ U ~ 4 Z u. 04 U 1 1 1 1 ,..t D a m tlt f r Q Cl GG D M - m ~" ~ fL fl D W ~" Z p cn LLF ~' 2 N ~^ 2 47 D i t~l! (L ' 1f S ~ ,~ ~' , " fi3 ~ ~' .6F ~Ri Q '. 14-~~. ~4~ V UttZ Ua. p mUtL ~U¢, D ~UrL _ ~ VV ~t1f „i: U, ~4w F~ M M M ti- ¢ O U ~' ¢ ~ . ~ ~ ~ tJOC7 C? ~L~ x Z Z OG li Z (c d K -. d K Z ~ 'aa Q. ~!~ Z ¢ `~ 1 V/ Cw G F" W Z Q. W ~_ Z ~_ E-- U Q W r z cW G Q w W U w Z Q w LL ~" f-' Z U W z Q ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / {~ -'fir AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: June Report on 1991 Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In order to keep the Board of Supervisors informed, staff will provide a monthly report on the progress of the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project, Water Treatment Plant Project and the Water Transmission Line Project. SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR PROJECT The construction of the reservoir is now in its thirtieth month and the project is on schedule. Construction activity during the last month included: ° Reservoir has been filled to 1288 elevation (full pond 1410), ° Monitoring and filling will continue as engineer authorizes, ° Observation site is open. The current project contract total costs including existing and pending change orders is $25,044,000. This cost remains unchanged from the previous report. Funds expended to date for the construction phase of the reservoir are $25,036,469.74 and $1,854,357.33 for engineering construction phase services. WATER TREATMENT PLANT The Water Treatment Plant continues in the design phase. Activity during the last month included: ° Continued construction of Glenvar Pump Station, ° Submitted construction plans and specifications to Health Department for review, ° Bids were received June 24, 1994 for pipe work between reservoir and treatment facility, ° Bids are due on grading treatment site June 30, 1994, During the next month, staff will perform the following: ° Award contract for river to plant pipe work, ° Award contract for rough grading of treatment site. WATER TRANSMISSION LINE The following work continues on the Water Transmission Line: ° Title certification, ° Easement negotiation, ° Obtaining easements, ° Preparation of construction drawings, ° Awarded contract for first section of transmission line (Starkey to Route 221). Work will continue on acquisition of easements during the next month. SUBMITTED Y: Gary Ro ertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Minnix Johnson Kohinke Eddy Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Sick Leave Report as of March 31, 1994 COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the sick leave report for the quarter ended March 31, 1994. The Department of Human Resources has been reporting sick leave usage on a quarterly basis. However, the Board of Supervisors has requested a monthly sick leave report in the future. The MIS Department is reprogramming the way sick leave is reported so that a monthly report can be generated as the Board requested. The July 26 report will reflect sick leave usage for the entire fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. In the future this report will be provided on a monthly basis and will also reflect the cumulative sick leave usage for the current fiscal year. / ~~--,- 'e-~l Elmer C. Dodge" County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens SUMMARY REPORT ~~ SICK LEAVE USAGE YYY"' FOR PERIOD 1/01/94 THRU 3/31/94 Average Number Sick Leave of Hours Used Department Employees 0.00 Property Management 1 0.00 Management & Budget 3 0.66 County Administrator 3 0.75 Human Services 2 1.50 Board of Supervisors 2 4.25 Economic Development 4 4.71 Procurement 7 8.34 Police 102 9.00 Management Services 1 9.12 County Attorney 4 9.22 Commissioner of Revenue 17 9.75 Human Resources 5 9.90 Real Estate Assessment 16 10.16 Commonwealth Attorney 6 10.78 Engineering & Inspections 32 11.71 Utility 59 12.07 Gnrl. Services-Radio Communications 7 12.25 Utility Billing 7 12.77 Central Accounting 17 12.81 Gnrl. Services-Custodial 11 12.91 Sheriff-Confinement of Prisoners 61 14.00 Cable Television 1 14.32 Fire 53 14.35 Treasurer 10 14.39 Parks & Recreation 25 16.00 Animal Control 4 16.56 Clerk of Circuit Court 12 18.13 Soc. Services-Eligibility Workers 23 19.03 Soc. Services-Social Workers 21 20.38 Soc. Services-Clerical 13 20.50 Gnrl. Services-Administration 6 21.50 Planning & Zoning 8 23.00 Elections 2 23.00 Gnrl. Services-Building Maintenance 5 23.75 Sheriff-Civil 19 24.02 Youth Haven-II 9 24.22 Grounds Maintenance 27 24.45 Police-Communications 21 24.73 Gnrl. Services-Solid Waste 32 24.75 Community Relations 1 27.37 Library 29 27.53 Management Information Systems 14 GRAND TOTALS Number of Employees - 692 Total Sick Leave Used in Period - 10,262.25 Hours Average Sick Leave Used in Period - 14.82 Hours (1.85 Days) 5-9-94 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER !T 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B). FISCAL IMPACT• None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Ap,~p°r~~oved by hn M. Chambliss, J Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A ~1 June 28, 1994 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY Despite a two week delay in the fabrication and shipment of steel roof joists, the overall project remains on schedule. The project architect and the contractor were able to devise a schedule realignment which kept the project on schedule. Construction of masonry walls and all brickwork for Phase I are complete; structural steel support work has been completed and the roof decking will be installed the first week of June. Electrical service has been switched to the new transformer and panelboards. Phase II excavation and grading have been completed; footings are completed and the foundation will be completed by June 4. Improved temporary parking has been installed and a protective shelter has been built for the side entrance to the building. PARKS AND RECREATION Bonsack Park -The grand opening of Bonsack Park was held on June 15, 1994. VALLEY TECHPARK A groundbreaking for the road portion was held on May 31, 1994. The water and sewer aspects of the project are ahead of schedule. FIRE HYDRANTS During the month of June, Salem is to install four hydrants on West Main Street. Once this phase is complete, the hydrant bond project will be completed with a total of 58 hydrants installed County wide. There were 24 hydrants installed in North County, 23 in South County, 6 in Vinton and 5 in West County. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 BUDGET $ 160 , ~0 0 PROJECT COORDINATORt NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY CONTRACT SPENCER WATT3 EXPENDITURES TO DATE 422, 2 ACCOUNT CODEt 109030 N-7 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP A 6 E PROPOSAL PLANNED S DESIGN ACTUAL BIDS PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Despite a two week delay in the fabrication and shipment of steel roof joists, the overall project remains on schedule. The project architect and the contractor were able to devise a schedule realignment which kept the project on schedule. Construction of masonry walls and all brickwork for Phase I are complete; structural steel support work has been completed and the roof decking will be installed the first week of June. Electrical service has been switched to the new transformer and panelboards. Phase II excavation and grading have been completed; footings are completed and the foundation will be completed by June 9, 1994. Improved temporary parking has been installed and a protective shelter has been built for the side entrance to the building. 1 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 2,00 9, 9. 0 PROJECT COORDINATORS GEORGE SZMPSON ACCOUNT CODES 1Og090 N~ TASK SELECT CONSULTANT PLANNED ACTUAL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANNED ACTUAL PREPARE CONSTRUCTION PLANNED DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE FOR BIDS PLANNED ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION PLANNED ACTUAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 q BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: The firm of Draper Aden is preparing the feasibility study. 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 90,000 PROJECT COORDINATORS BUTCH WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODEt 104050 N7 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN_ FEB HAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH CITIZENS PLANNED ACTUAL BID, PRE-BID CONFERENCE PLANNED ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Report was prepared for proposed options and presented to the Board of Supervisors. 3 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - GREEN VALLEY $ BUDGET ~0 CONTRACT 9 ,~ 0 EXPENDITURES TO DATE 2. PROJECT COORDIBATORt BUTCB WORKMAB ACCOUBT CODSt 109050 N7 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEH MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PHASE II PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH CITIZENS/VDOT PLANNED ACTUAL BID PLANNED ACTUAL AWARD CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 22,000 COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. Phase I Murray Run below F fi w building (Upstream from Phase II) 3. Phase II trunk line along Colony Lane and drainage easement. 9. Phase I - $7,500 from F fi w and $15,000 from Drainage Budget Phase II - $75,000 from Bond 5. P-120 to be constructed with Phase ZI. 4 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~~0 0 PROSHCT COORDIHATORi BUTCH NORIOIAN ACCOUHT CODS: 104050 ~,~ TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING (FIELD) ACTUAL ..................................... ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED -.....:._'„ CITIZENS ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: No permanent easements are needed. 5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 ~ r'"1 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - MT. VERNON HEIGHTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 20,000 20,000.00 PROJHCT COORDINATORt HUTCH HORRMAN ACCOUNT CODS: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL HOURLY PLANNED CONTRACT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Project is complete. 6 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - WOLFE CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~, S~0 0 P ROJHCT COORDIHATORt BUTCH WORR?IAN ACCOUHT CODSt 109050 n~ TASK SELECT SURVEYING FIRM PLANNED ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY (AERIAL PLANNED ) ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH VDOT PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH CITIZENS PLANNED ACTUAL PRE-BID CONFERENCE PLANNED (BID) ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL ~ 1 ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ 3 I I l l 9 l 9 l 9 l BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. VDOT participation at crossing of creek on Stoneridge Circle. 7 BOND PROJECT UPDATE ~ ~ Attachment B June 28, 1994 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 300,000 PROJECT COORDINATORt GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUDTT CODEt 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP AFP ENGINEERING PLANNED SERVICES ACTUAL SE LEC T CONSULT ANT LANN ED ACTUAL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANNED ACTUAL PREPARE WATERSHED PLANNED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL POLICY PLANNED ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. INVESTIGATION PLANNED ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Request for proposal is complete. We are awaiting official confirmation of grant approval from FEMA. 8 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B ~-~ June 28, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 100 Expen Mures: 2,99 PROJECT COORDIHATORt JOHH CHANBLISS ACCOUNT CODSf 104209, 104201, 104203 104204 N = ENCUMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEH HAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP WALAOND PARK PLANNED 31,000 :'G4tia1:''' :::~.~ tN~:< " SOCCER FIELD • . ACTUAL 0 :` ~ih ;~~#~ .. . ~~~. C1,.. ~f3bt , .;;.CDN :Lf9D1 ,.~U1Q:;:: WALROND PARK PLANNED 62, 000 ~`:;~{'~'(~~': '~'~' 2 BASEBALL FIELD S AC TUAL 3 9 908 ' ,IA 8..x#! .~Sf3; tJ#;.; ~4~! : .C~ ;:Cbft . ;,CA2;;::: NORTHSIDE PLANNED 52,000 REALIGN FIELDS ACTU AL 52 538 tt UH (!Lt A1Q ~t ; ;C~t f3DI bM;;:: ~~. I`4 BONSACK PARK PLANNED 20,000 BALL FIELD AC TU AL 9 4 059 ': ~ 4?A,.. ~?.: DR . ;:.fit ..:CDR . CCFF.;: BONSACK PARK PLANNED 15,000 PICNIC SHELTER ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .,,,.,,. ACTUAL 12,582 '' ;;CORE:; .:<: : >:C~?bt.;; .......... .:4`E~t;: . ' ~DDI ~...::::. ::4'..... H ', ~` ~! <; ~ ' ~ <;~ ,;: BONSACK PARK PLANNED 10,000 PLAYGROUND E UI PMENT Q C TU AL 997 ::~'~'~1:~ :L:;i;::',:; ~SP~ :i:~~:;:~` bS#z„. :y:y::~~ ~2t3.:: ~::i ~~:~i: ., ~~ : ::~:~::s~: :GQci : i~:~:~:<: .;CD1Q s'"~~~~~'~~: ; ~b7~t ::':>:~:: .. kL~>:. ~'~':~:~~: .'~tafl;;: VZNYARD PARK I PLANNED 62,000 2 BASEBALL F IELDS ACT UAL 0 98 fG ~NG. ;.~rtG... l~G,;: ; RNG. Ct}xt ;CraN G4~t.;:: VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150,000 LIGHT SOCCER FIELD AC TUAL 57 70 9 TOTAL PLANNED 402,000 ACTUAL 321,886 COMMENTS: Northside Ballfields - The construction has been completed. The hook up to the water main will occur with the development of the Forensics Lab adjacent to our property. Bonsack Park - Grading for the development of the baseball field, entrance and parking area has been completed. The picnic shelter was finished during the month of March. The play apparatus is being installed. The opening of the park is scheduled for June 15, 1999. Walrond Park - The contractor is completing the excavation work at this site for two baseball fields and one soccer field. 9 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 BUDGET $ 100 PROJECT COORDINATOR: N-~ PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE JOHH CHAMBLZSS ACCOUNT CODSt 104204, 104210, 104212 109205, 104207 N = ENCUMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP VINYARD PARK Z PLANNED 25,000 2:~.`i#G'i- ......_.... ~:'?i~~tiiii _ ......... i~x~i'i ... : i`:ii:;:;%?:::: :: ~~ `::~ ::;'''i~'t` .:: ~ ` ~ .: PARKING >: ; ...... .. . . . . . .: ACTU AL 0 : :~~!G:.: :~HG <~l~~:: ;:;:LNG;?; <~NU:;: CDN`> >LON:> iCDN:; VINYARD PARK Z PLANNED 25,000 RESTROOM UTIL LS; A CTUAL 0 ~~~~Ciii~ ` i::: ;ENG., ~NG:» . :.,ENG>' . LNG..;: ;::::i'.:: o: ;:~t2di::>: VINYARD PARK 2 PLANNED 50,000 F#dG ~1~~,;~:' 9Y14::;; CO11 %C(Jp :: LIGHT BASEBALL ,.. . ACTUAL 0 i''.~i:6'!JG>: VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25, 000 .LNG F.NG-?~ 8x~t ;. :>CE~SI`~:: :: C ` D3I :: CONCESSION/ ::::. ,:,; , _ .. . , _ . . .;~:::.:;: :: .;~:..:. : • : ~ :o;> »»: STORAGE ACTUAL 0 ............ L`'t1G .......... pi4~(n: :21I~2 ` .. .2:~~!~ ::. .. .;::~3t~t;<` : : : ........... ;:~~2i : . ........... ': ~~,:: MT. PLEASANT PLANNED 90,000 ~~G' ia[iA~£!'f PARK BALL FIE LD ACTUAL 7 ::~Si:!r.: ;,,.tiG :i:ii:{[~.i..~ .LNG ii:Sii2:i ~l~G.: ilii:i?i%i~ ~rtG::. `i?i%:: , ~4~G . iii: i~i~ii~ .;;,E;bJG ~~`~ ~:'`?: ;~HG,. i iit~i~i ,6z#x;:: STONEBRIDGE PK PLANNED 25,000 LNG ~N~Ij%' ..$T £t:`: '':C(kDP:. 4`~1Q :; RESTROOM UTZL. . . ; ACTUAL 0 BYRD SCHOOL PLANNED 60,000 LIGHT BASEBALL FIEL D CTUAL 0,678 ~~.i' D1Q 4'QDt:i: ..Cl'~1Q.:. ..G`4'Jfl: iit"':2;;;;;;. ~:;u'':::.;?i'i ~'~:::::: ''.~. '. :~;:.':' ~ .. :::.:: WHISPERING PLANNED 31,000 PINES PK. - .:::::::::::. ::.:::::::: BASE BALL FIELD CT UAL 696 ...~?~::< :::9x#4;:; TOTAL PLANNED 281,000 ACTUAL 67,381 COMMENTS: Lighting - The installation of lights at Byrd Baseball career Center and Starkey Park are complete. Vinyard Park -Construction of the two baseball fields and parking is in progress. 10 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B ('~ June 28, 1994 w PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 100 PROJECT COORDINATORS JOHN CHAHBLISS ACCOUHT CODS: 104207, 104211, 104206, 109213, 104202 N = ENCUMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP WH S I PERZNG PLANNED 60 000 PINES - LIGHT BALLFZELD ACTUAL 0 WHISPERING PIN PLANNED 25,000 ES - AESTR OOM UTIL CTU AL 0 iFSN~. 0iii WHISPERING PINE PLANNED 36,000 :#J~~''~ S -TENNIS/ B ASKETB ALL CT CTUAL 0 "rC E~ t~G'' Y.AT~r 'NG '''EDTC. fitPG%::: ~~~7c. GREEN HILL PK 2 P C PLANNED 30, 000 L>N'f,' ~ ANC.:' E~~7;-~ CfyN ''~pg:;: I NIC SHELTERS ACTUAL 21,973 ;:.:....:. :~si:;: '~' .. ~~~~~ rvJ14 > CE~< '4Dt>: t3N. ,. - x'49:, iii:%~. i:. ::.;:. :i.;:;2i;,..;. ?<~~?i?':: GARST HILL PK LIGHT 2 PLANNED 129,000 BALL F IELDS CTU AL 8 2 :i: .. .. WINDSOR HILLS AREA PURC PLANNED 50,000 HASE LAND ACTUAL 0 INDSOR HILLS AREA 2 BALL LANNED 2 , 000 ............ ............ ............ ............ ::~~~: ............ ............ ............ ............ :~~~~}~: - FIELDS ACTUAL 0 ' STARKEY PARK 2 BASEBALL PLANNED 62,000 FIELDS ACTUAL 94,539 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~ ii:iCf)ti::; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"'~ :i:i~CjjSf:i' TOTAL PLANNED 499,000 ACTUAL 67,994 COMMENTS: Whispering Pines Park - The engineering work has been completed and is being bid. This work includes a new baseball field, and a combination basketball/tennis court. 11 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 ~-~ BUDGET $ 1,~~00 P ROJHCT COORDINATORt PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE JO88 CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODSt 104202, 104214, 104218, 104220, 104219 N = ENCUMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAA APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP STARKEY PARK PLANNED 31, 000 !'r :~Nti`'i iAT~I' 1 BASEBALL , FIELD ACTU AL 67 995 NG:': ::::>:<: ::: ,: ~4~~:: ::~ttG:: G4hDt: Ctti2~` ~ti:: STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62,000 LIGHT 1 FIELD ACTU AL 6 391 '??C:o: :~'.AT~<:; ::.Ct~2 :;5%'~?Y1:>: s~~~~: :G'K~1`#;:: :t'OM:;: :~.I.~1';:: ::,R'$A:::: STARKEY PARK P CANNED 25 000 ~:~:~~~ti':~ ~'~:~~ G; `":~i:~:~:~:::~:~ ~~4. .; ~::~i~:::~: Ci~N :''.:.'.~'.'.~::: Chat. RESTROOM UTIL . :: ACTUAL 0 `:?$NG:`: <EfJG''i: izi'LNCi`` i~t~TGz £'1wl3G3> TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210,400 i;;?~'~NG ' RENOVATIONS "'~~~~~" ' ACTU AL 1 000 LNG< . . . ALL FIELD LANNED 2,000 . .. ..... ............ ............ ............ L>NG ............ ............ ............ ............ -19~~Y:~i~ FENCING ........ .......... ACTU AL 12 47 5 FACILITY PLANNED 91,000 REPAIRS . ::: CRAIG AVEN ACTUAL 38 , 79 L :;;:~.:~. <:C`~i ~;i~i~':C :~: ~;::.i;i :~:;i;?iii?? ::;~!:»>:•;;. .... .;%~:.y::::4 : ~::~~I:`-: -. E,;,i .. :.. ~i`~1:z~::i`ii FACILITY PLANNED 11,000 REPAIRS LEIS UAE ARTS ACTU AL 0 FACILITY PLANNED 4,500 REPAIRS W ALRON D OF C. C U T AL 115 : TOTAL PLANNED 446,900 ACTUAL 128,767 COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations -Bids are being received for tennis court repairs. Ball Field Fencing - The bid has been awarded; the schedule has been prioritized; and work has begun at Northside, Hidden valley and several repair sites. 12 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 n~ PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 1,50 0 PROJECT COORDIDIATORs JOHR CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODES 104221, 104216, 109217, 109208 N =ENCUMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ADA ACCESS PLANNED 15, 100 ~~~f:;Ej~j~<' ACTUAL GROUND COVER PLANNED 42,000 ~GQ~ii FOR PLAY- GROUN D E UI P. Q CTU AL 0 102 :pip'>: <:.>::::;: IN FIELD SURF. PLANNED 54 000 MATERIALS FOR BASEBALL .. . ,_ ~ : ~ ~ ~~~ '' ' +~ i i .. `i i 1 : is . . FIELDS ACTUAL 96,200 ~:.;.fv,'DR . CC4Qi : L'i?l4>:; : C i:; ; .; . : : :.:4-~.:: ...~OZ3.•. ....;, .,.t2i~lq; ~<;' ~''~7i`i; YI«R ~'£~ - CAREER CENTER PLANNED 60, 000 '~~,''~~`Qpt:: ::::'app:::: REPLACE LIGHTS . a:;::::~:' :r.:~::~ .. ..:...:.::.: ~::.... .. ., -:: ....... ACTUAL 40, 625 Ct31Q`:: ~`>L`f}Dl`E'. ' CtJ1V':' ?:.G`f}t~l:; .~.C'~N~ ~`:',L`4~Df ~:: .:'C". . LY, :. M- F' a L ~-.> ~ tE' >:~.'...: TOTAL PLANNED 171,100 ACTUAL 116,927 COMMENTS: Infield surface materials have been purchased and are being spread. Ground cover materials for use around play apparatus has been bid and will be installed by County staff. 13 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 ROAD PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ X00,000 00,000.00 $ 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDINATORi ARNOLD COVEY ACCOUNT CODSt 104070 i' TASK VDOT PLANNED ADVERTISES ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS CONTRACT ON PLANNED ALL PROJECTS (57) ACTUAL ALL PROJECTS CONS PLANNED TRUCTED 6 COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC SAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: All plant mix projects completed except Sierra Drive which will be completed this coming spring (1999). Incidental projects (4 projects) - Deed preparation has been completed for Ridgelea Road. Documents have yet to be signed by property owners. VDOT is working on the deed preparation on Willow Branch Road, Eveningwood Lane and Cove Road. VDOT plans to begin construction on all projects this coming spring. 19 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~00 9 , .9 PROJECT COORDINATOR[ BRIAR T. DUNCAN ACCOUNT CODS[ s , C ~`~°~ ~4j TASX 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APA MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MASTER PLAN PLANNED ACTUAL LAND PLANNED ACQUISITION/ EXCHANGE ACTUAL DETAIL PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ACCESS REQUEST ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ........... BIDS ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ACTUAL START ROAD, PLANNED ~~::::::: . ; >::>:: ...~~:~. ... ~:::::~~:.'' .::~:: .: .;> ~ .; .; .., .; UTILITY ... . .;;:. . ... .. CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: A groundbreaking for the road portion was held on May 31, 1999. The water and sewer line aspects of the project are ahead of schedule. 15 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 FIRE HYDRANTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 184,000 J. P. Turner 158, 1 .O1 PROJECT COORDINATOR: RON BDWARDS ACCOUNT CODB: (v ') TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB NAR APA MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP NSTALLATION LANNED ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ACTUAL FINAL INSP., ACCEPTANCE 6 PLANNED PRO.IECT COMPLETION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: During the month of June, Salem is to install four hydrants on West Main Street. Once this phase is complete, the hydrant bond project will be completed with a total of 58 hydrants installed County wide. There were 24 hydrants installed in North County, 23 in South County, 6 in Vinton and 5 in west County. 16 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B June 28, 1994 ~ ~~ PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ X0,000 240,121.01 PROJHCT COORDINATORSt JOHN CHAMBLISS AHD HONER DUFF ACCOUNT CODSt 155140 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 q BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PURCHASE OF LAND PLANNED 750,000 ACTUAL 290,121 TOTAL PLANNED 750,000 ACTUAL 240,121 COMMENTS: 17 ~~\ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-9 OF APPRECIATION UPON THE RETIREMENT OF DR. BAYES WILSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, Bayes Elwood Wilson was born in Russell County, Virginia, left high school to join the military, and subsequently completed his schooling, through the doctoral level, while working and raising a family; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson began working with the Roanoke County School System in March, 1956, as a student teacher at Andrew Lewis High School, and has held a variety of positions with the Roanoke County School System, culminating with his appointment as Division Superintendent in 1980; and WHEREAS, during his time as Superintendent, Dr. Wilson has overseen a variety of achievements, including o Six schools recognized for educational excellence by the state of Virginia and an additional five schools recognized nationally for educational excellence; o Institution of computer education in the classrooms; o Implementation of the Middle School concept; o Founding of an alternative education program at the Roanoke County Career Center; o Establishment of local PTA units for elementary, middle and high schools; o Recognition for excellence of Chapter 1 program in both reading and mathematics at both state and national levels; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson has also been active in professional associations, community and civic organizations, and has been honored by the Roanoke Chapter of Phi Delta Kappa as the Educator of the Year in 1992, and received the Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce Award for Service to Education in 1994; and WHEREAS, Bayes Wilson will retire at the end of the 1994 school year, leaving Roanoke County with a nationally recognized, neighborhood oriented school system which provides an outstanding education to the children of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of the children of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to Bayes Elwood Wilson for his leadership and guidance of the Roanoke County School System, for his service to the citizens of the County and for his continued emphasis, through his own example, of the importance of education; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Dr. Wilson for a happy, productive and healthy retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools o-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION UPON THE RETIREMENT OF DR. BAYES WILSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, Bayes Elwood Wilson was born in Russell County, Virginia, left high school to join the military, and subsequently completed his schooling, through the doctoral level, while working and raising a family; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson began working with the Roanoke County School System in March, 1956, as a student teacher at Andrew Lewis High School, and has held a variety of positions with the Roanoke County School System, culminating with his appointment as Division Superintendent in 1980; and WHEREAS, during his time as Superintendent, Dr. Wilson has overseen a variety of achievements, including o Six schools recognized for educational excellence by the state of Virginia and an additional five schools recog- nized nationally for educational excellence; o Institution of computer education in the classrooms; o Implementation of the Middle School concept; o Founding of an alternative education program at the Roanoke County Career Center; o Establishment of local PTA units for elementary, middle and high schools; o Recognition for excellence of Chapter 1 program in both reading and mathematics at both state and national levels; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson has also been active in professional associations, community and civic organizations, and has been honored by the Roanoke Chapter of Phi Delta Kappa as the Educator ai of the Year in 1992, and received the Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce Award for Service to Education in 1994; and WHEREAS, Bayes Wilson will retire at the end of the 1994 school year, leaving Roanoke County with a nationally recognized, neighborhood oriented school system which provides an outstanding education to the children of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on its own behalf, and on behalf of the children of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to Bayes Elwood Wilson for his leadership and guidance of the Roanoke County School System, for his service to the citizens of the County and for his continued emphasis, through his own example, of the importance of education; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Dr. Wilson for a happy, productive and healthy retire- ment. A-62894-10 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER D ' -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization for the Roanoke County School Board to Submit Certain Literary Fund Applications /~ ~ ~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~c-L,d,~'~"" ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On June 14, 1994 the Roanoke County School Board presented their need to apply for Literary Loan Funding for the following Projects: Additional funding needed to complete $ 500,000 William Byrd High School project Construction at Fort Lewis Elementary for classrooms and gymnasium $1,300,000 Renovations at Glenvar Elementary School 100 000 $1,900,000 The School Board took action on these items on June 8, 1994. A copy of the resolution from the County School Board is attached. County staff will work with County School Board staff to complete the Literary Loan applications and file them with the State. Once the applications are filed, the projects will be placed on the waiting list until Literary Loan funds become available. It is envisioned that these projects will be constructed during the period of 1996 through 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: The debt service related to the payment of these Literary Loans will be included in future year budgets. Attachment A is a preliminary view of future debt service for the Roanoke County School Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends allowing the School Board to submit the Literary Fund loan applications to the State for the projects defined. Q- 3 Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~; ~ ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approv d by, /~n~~'~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Rah r, _ .r~hnson No Yes Abs Denied () to authorize submittal Eddy _ x - Received () o f $1 , 9 0 0, 0 0 0 Johnson _ x - Referred O Kohinke _ _ To O Minnix _ x Nickens _ x cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Attachment A O~ °o O0 ~ y en 0 a, ~, . C ~ d O •L Ua'° °~ " o o ~ Ci cA'o s° v. 'S O cnC Vi~NV'~~0 ~-~v~O ~'~-"OO0 [~MMO00000 ~O ~DV ~O ~O ~.-.M~'~O O~v1M^NO~NOONO007 MOOS Ov1OOOO y d C C~ N ." ; [ ^ ^-' [~ N h ^ t~ ~ 00 ~D 00 N O M V1 00 00 ~O cn [~ ~ ^ et fn ~ v. :1 v M Ol V C c p~ ~ ~ .- ^ 00 O ~O ~ Q~ O ~O O 00 00 '~ r [~ ~ 00 .-. [~ 00 V1 O~ v1 ~O O ^ p ~ ~ .. .-. O ~O ~ O •.• •--~ •-• M ~ M ~O 00 ^" 00 [~ 00 00 00 00 00 0OO E 7 W C R y 0 D o00 v M'cf NN 7vi ~D ~O OO CTONVI VI Vi ~D7 R ~ ~ `-' `-' ..i ...~ ... .-. ~-. -. --~ ~--" N N N N M M M M -. C 1 . . r~ G p O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 DO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O O O O ~ .-. N ..r .-. ~p ^~ ~p ~--~ Vi .--. ~p •--~ ~p .-. ~p .-. ~p .-. ~p ^ v1 O~ i/1 M •-• ~O ~--~ [~ 7 O [~ M O ~O M Q~ ~O N O~ Vl N 00 V1 00 00 M _ _ CC i y. ^ N l~ O et ^' 00 vi ~--~ 00 Vl ~--~ oo ~ ^ oo 'cY ^~ oo ~ ^" V1 vi O M ~ ~ N ~ N Y~1 0~0 OHO O~0 OMO ONO 000 ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 N " ~ " E..ZC ~; 0 ° o ¢ oo ~ v~ ; o ~ ~ , ,~Q ds O ,-a ~ o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 'Oo (~, 0 O ~0O~00 L^~O he7MN^00^00 [~~O ~n etMN^-~ O C1 O y, ~~ _ 7N CT O~[~vlM^Q~[~vi M ~--~00 ~0 'ctNO00 ~ O ~ ~oow-~ Q, ~o~ooooorno~ao~o,oooooooooot~~t~t~ ~ e .. ~ o -z~ w .~ .~ .~ .~ _. N ~ a C~' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V1 0 V1 0 Vl O vl ' O O O \ o 1 0 V1 0 V1 0 V1 O vl O V1 0 V ON~[~ONVI [~ONV1 l~ONvi[~ONV~[~ ~~~ yt rl • ~ ^y„ O ~ ~ O ~O N 00 V1 ^ I'~ M O ~O N 00 V1 ^ [~ M O ~O N 00 ov .--~ O ~ ~ 00 00 00 [~ l~ t~ ~O ~D Vl V'1 Vl 'ch ~ 'V' M M N ~ N N N O ~ N . . ~ ~ ~ h \ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 et~77~'7~77et~7~'~7 ~'7~7 V'~ ~[ ~ ~ O ~ ~~C•O N~ ax o N ~ [~I l ~p[~[~l~[~l~[~[~[~l~t~[~l~[~[~I~t rno,rno~o:aQ;o:o;o~arno~rno~a,o~rno;o;a~ ~ ~* ¢ w ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ -'3 z w ~v o a a ~ 00000000000000000000 o,~o,,.,o,r,o,,.,o„~,o„~,o„~oviov,ovi l~ O N V'~ l~ V ' 0 o '~ ~ C/1 n O E M l 1 [~ O N h l^ O N ~p O N h I ~ O N V i D ( 'x O~ H , ~., V ~ O~OO~o0l~t~~0v'i7~MN~--~~OQ~OOO0[~~ ~p ^ tY' M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N NNN N ~ ~ ~ 3 y v w 4 _ ?v 2,N ~i a 00000000000000000000 00000 0 ~ o°o yM 000000000000000 ~ooooo00000000000000o c x.ao •- ~ y O~ O [~ ~ ^~ DD V1 N Q~ 'V Cl O [~ 'c1 ~-'~ 00 ~ N O~ ~O M O O O p O ,p ~ ., ~ ~ ... ~ V1 ~(1 h~ ~' Ct M M M M N N N .--i ^^ O ~ .-. ^ .-. ^ .-. ~..-.....-.... ~..-....-. ~-..-... ~ O c ~" N «Nr.,O 3 yq N w ..~ ^^ «fO = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OvlO V1O v1O V'iO V'~O ~nO V1O V~0 V1O Y1 O O M a 00 ;..., M N ~ h N v1 ~ b N v1 [~ O N N [~ O N v1 I C O N ~/1 t~ , 4: pp N ~O N 00 vi ^~ l~ M O ~O N 00 h ^~ l~ M O ~O N 00 0.~ O O ~ ~ C .~ ~ ~ C ~ O~ O~ 00 00 00 l~ t~ [~VV V'1 ~/1 V1 ~ ~ 7 M M N £+ bA .--i ^ .r .--i .-i .-n .r .-. .r .-. ^ .-r .--i ..r .--i '.r .--i 'r .--i ^ . Vl N V ~ ~ C ~ U .~ M ~aN . `n wvai . a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ra OO .Oc O ~ ~ Q ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN^ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V' V'- V' ~O ~G ~O ~O ~O ~O ~D ~D M ~ ¢ ~ ~N'ct d'~eP~~~77R7et ~'d'~et ~'ct~N b~ v1 G N ~ ~C/~04. v1OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO M O N Z .~ .O ~-~ y ~ Ol~a'M7~OM~NO~M OON Q~00 ~O V1 ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~D ~O ~ ~0O00 [SOON ^~ ~/1 OOM V- Mtn^00N V1 ~0OOOOOOOOO 0 ~ U y r : : : •: ~ O 00 00 ~--~ N M ^ ^' V'- V"1 l!") CT Q~ ~ ~ 7 00 N fr1 ~ V l f 1 y ^ .-. . .-. ^ .-. . ~O ~D Q~ ~O O "' ~O [~ M O~ N 00 00 N I~ M V' v1 ^ [ O ~ ~ [~ O~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 T V • O ' O~ .D U ~ ~} ~p ~p ,~, ,- a O l C N ~ '.. [~ M V ~n ~D t^O NNNNOOOOOOOO ~ ^ .~ ~-. ^~~O ~O ~ONM~t r ., ~ x m (.,~.~ ~(rJ , ~ a~ .-..--^---^--~NNNNNr~iMMMMrIMM ~O . ~O ~O O~ N M N O M N et t~ M OO ~ [~ 00 O^ ~/'~ vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ O~ N M N 00 O~ v1 N V^ ~ V M 00 ^ 00 vl ~ O O ' D C p ~ 1 V1 00 'cY ^~ M [~ N ~ ~ ^ O O~ ^ ^ ~O t~ r M M V --~ l~ V n ^ O~ M N GT V [~ 7 vl C1+ M ~ ~ ^ ~ ^ 00 A 7 ~ ~ Q . 00 M ~O O ~ M M ^r ^ V~ V' 00 T o0 N r M ^ O O~ ~ ~ O N O~ U ~O ~ 7 ~' 00 [~ ~ V'- V cn M O 00 00 00 n ~ ~ ~ ~ E.., Q ^ --' ~ ^ ^ ~ M M N N N NNN ^ z a a h `O t~ op q 0 '~ N M T h b n O'J q O '~ N M rr h b n OO q C ~ ° ggqqqqOOOCCCCOOO ~. ~'r '~. 'ma'r '~'~-~'~NN ~ M 7 h b l~ OO N O 'r N M R h b l~ OO O~ O '~ N M Q vl `O ri OO a O V g q q q q q q C p C C C O C C O O '~ 1 1 1 'r 1 1 'r 1 1 ~1 o . H C N N N N N N N N N N ~ C 1 a Q a a g a N +`+ ~ `+ N N N + N N N ti ti U O Q U O 4 0 0 h 0 r •o 0 fi 0 a y 01 O O O O O O °: O O ~ h O ~ ~ ~ O n, a ~ ~ r ~ O Q ~ CS ~ m o y ti ~ ~~ am 0 00 d ~~ d C O ~ ~ ~~ Q U] U O ~ Y O y ~ ~ C 0 c~ N d ~ ~ y ~_ ~ 4. ~ aci ~ O d U ~' a ~ ~4 N Q w C fi o OA O .C o ~,t~ .~ ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ a ~ O_0 ~ ~ O ~ ~~ Cl s a_S Q U g a a' y • ~ 1F Y F-' m W 0 .n d -~ V' rn NUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ FROM THE MI MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON JUNE 8, 1994 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR A LITERARY FUND LOAN FOR THE FORT LEWIS AND GLENVAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECTS. WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has approved improvements to Fort Lewis Elementary School (classroom and gymnasium addition, air conditioning, electrical and other renovations); and renovations to Glenvar Elementary School based on preliminary cost estimates of $1,400,000, and WHEREAS, the board has elected to make application for a Literary Fund loan in the amount of $1,400,000; BE IT RESOLVED, that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded, requests the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to authorize said school board to submit an application to the Commonwealth of Virginia for a Literary Fund loan in the amount of $1,400,000 for the projects at Fort Lewis and Glenvar Elementary schools. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Barbara B. Chewning, Charlsie S. Pafford, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: /_ ~~~ ~,~~ ~ ~~ Clerk =----- c; Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge . ~ 'J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-11 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE >.......~...:..r.:>:.;:>;;:<::: CHOOL BONDS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed ~~D .~~>>(~~ ("Bonds") to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Projects") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1994 VPSA bond sale. 2. The Board adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the County School Board to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the Projects from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Pro ects is ~'~ ^^^ ^^^ ~°`"~~ 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. On Supervisor Eddy's amended motion to approve $300,000 for roofs, and $200,000 for site improvements at Glenvar Schools, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: ~'Y Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Attachment A Proposed VPSA Fall 1994 Bond Sale Roofs $300,000 .-, .. ...... r, ---- 1 L ~ .Y, '~z.~~~ vir 111 ~ ~ ~T/r ~.._ 1 } / ZZ~CI'1"j"T 7 C G A A A 7~~ Site Improvements - Glenvar Schools 200,000 $500,000 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to Apply for Inclusion in the Virginia Public School Authority's Fall 1994 Bond Sale Including Reimbursement Provisions COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,~,=C,~-.,~'t-.,,'~ e~~L~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On June 14, 1994 the Roanoke County Schools presented their capital improvements program. Included in this program was a projected bond sale through the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) for the fall of 1994 in the amount of $1,200,000 as outlined in Attachment A. The School Board requested that the Board take action as soon as possible allowing for this fall bond sale and also to include the proper reimbursement language so that the Schools could proceed with the projects on this list during the summer of 1994 prior to the receipt of the bond proceeds. The Roanoke County School Board adopted a resolution on June 23, 1994 expressing their desire to participate in the VPSA fall 1994 bond sale. A copy of their resolution is attached to this report. The County Board of Supervisors will also need to adopt the attached resolution in order to allow the Schools to apply to the VPSA for the fall 1994 sale. This resolution includes the necessary reimbursement language that allows the School Board to begin the expenditures of this project immediately, using an advance of County funds until such time as bond proceeds are received from the VPSA in the fall of 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: The County School Board will be receiving an advance of funds from Roanoke County in anticipation of their bond sale in the fall of 1994. Staff does not anticipate any problem with cash flow related to this advance during the time period that will be involved. At the present time the School Board budget does not include funds to pay for the debt service related to this issue during the 1994-95 fiscal year. Annual debt service on this issue is estimated to be $104,620. During the 1994-95 fiscal year budget we will need to pay one half year debt service or $52,310. On June 8, 1994, the School Board expressed their intent to set aside this amount from their year end balance. Future years debt service is projected on Attachment B. d`~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution to apply for VPSA funding in the fall of 1994. Respectfully submitted, ~~tx~~ ~. -ma=r-~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION () Motion by: () () () () Approve , by, ~~ ~-~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ Johnson _ _ Kohinke _ _ Minnix _ Nickens _ _ Attachment A Proposed VPSA Fall 1994 Bond Sale ~ I Roofs $300,000 Glen Cove Elevator 125,000 Alarm Systems/Mobile Unit 155,000 ADA Improvements 100,000 Burlington Windows 120,000 RCOS -Lighting and HVAC 200,000 Site Improvements - Glenvar Schools 200,000 $1,200,000 June 17, 1994 C:\WPWIN60\Corres\France.wpd Attachment B 0 0 s u C O U O C CC O c O w U ~O L a a~ A ~r en C d ^O 0 0 O L' O M V V1 ~ N Vl ~O V Vl O ~' ^ O 00 [~ M M 00 00 00 ~O ~O ~O ~ ~ ';j ~ ,~ d C ~ G h ~--~ M ~' CO Q~ Yl M^ N O~ N O O N O 00 ~ M 00 7 0 v1 0 0 0 0 h ^ [~ N h ~--' h ~ 00 ~O 00 N O M Vl 00 00 ~O M h 'ct ~- ~t rl c''^ ~'r1 : + ~. v. 7 v M Ctl ~ ~ £ Q~~„ v •-• ^. o0 O ~O V Q~ O ~O O o0 00 of [~ [~ ~O o0 .-. [~ 00 v'i O~ vi ~O O •- N O vl O~ ^ ^ O ~O 7 O •..• •--• •-• M ^ h M ~O 00 ^~' 00 [~ 00 00 00 00 00 OOO y~~„ y, ~ T N--~M~NN^<YVI~D~OOOO~ONVivlvi~D V rt~OOOO v `~ `~ `-i ~..i ~~ ~ r ~- N N N N M M M M Q d ... W C C ~ C r •--, .-. .--, .-. ~ O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O O O O ~ O ~p vl O~ Vl ~-. .N. r.. .-. ~ .-. ~p ^ ~p .... ~p •-• ~p •-• ~p ..-. ~p ~p ^ O h M O ~O M O^ ~O N O~ V1 N 00 V'^ 00 ^ 00 ~ M ~O ^ [~ V "~ CC ~ .`~. ^ N l~ O of ^•' 00 V1 ^ 00 v1 ^ 00 V ^ 00 et o0 7 ~--~ V1 V'1 O N ~ v ~ Z n . vi ~D h h ~O ~ M N O O~ 00 ~G V1 7 N^ O 00 h ~O O~ O O ~ N h 00 00 00 00 00 00 h [~ h h h h h h ~O ~O ~O vl 'c}' N M O ~ L Q ~ ~ Ur f/1 ~ y O ~ ? ~ Q ~..+ ,.,~ ~O a ~ ~ 00000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 ' 0 0 O oo v Cz, ' O ~ ct M N h O Q~ 00 t~ ~D V1 R M N ^ O Q~ 00 h ~O Vl O r \ L - _ ~ N O~ O~ l~ V'i M O~ [~ vi M o0 ~O 7 N O o0 ~ O ~ R ~ow Q, ~o,ooooorno.c~aa~oooocooooohhhh .. - ~ ~ e ~ '~ o .- .~ . . . w = ;~-z~ ``' c9 a 00000000000000000000 ov~ ov ~ ~ 0 o O o ~ ° 0 , n no o,,,o,no,no,nov,ov~o O Nhh ONvl l [ ~ONV ~ v1 ,~ 0 f ~a ~ ~ I ~ n [ hONh[~ON O~ O ~O N 00 V1 t~ M O ~O N 00 V'1 ~--~ h M O ~O N 00 h ~., pp .--, O Q~ Q~ 00 00 00 h h h ~O ~O V1 V'1 Vl ~ 7 ~' M M N N ~ N N O 69 N r~ ~ h \° O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~~'7 ~•d'~~7~~7~~'et~~'~T ~'7~' O ~p ~ ~ ~. O N~ ~ [~ h h h h h h h h h h h [~ h h I~ h h h h ~ O w y I O~ O~ O~ Q~ Q~ O~ O~ O~ O~ Q~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ D\ O~ O~ ~ Q z ~~ ~ ~ n. 00000000000000000000 0 O Q- O \ n 0~\ ~ O V~ O Vl O Vl O h 0 v1 O V1 O V1 O V1 O V1 O h S O N h r O N h h O N V1 [~ O N V'1 [ S O N h [~ '~? f ~xy O~ ~ O+O Q~00h h~0 V'i7~MN~--~~OO~o000 t~~O V'i N N N N N N ~ ` ,~. ~ ^~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M v ~ O ~~ 69 z W i N y 1-~ 00000000000000000000 0 0 ~ ~ 00 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~p00000000000000000000 O '""~O•-~ ^ j OHO [met .-: 00 vlN O~VMO[~~ oO ViN O~~DM O ~ y p ~ ,~N., ij .--~ ~ V'~ V1 vl 7 7 ~ M M M M N N ~~~~ 0 0 0 ~ G: y N N O . "' 69 N ' a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g ' - o 0 o°o•=o O ^ ,ov~ ~ ~nov,o~no~noviov~0~no~no~nov p~ Vl N Vl h b N V'~ [~ O N vl h O N v7 t ~ O N Vl h ~ 0 ~"'~ ~"'~ ~ ~ pq N ~O N 00 vi .-: h M O ~D N 00 v1 ~--~ t~ M O ~O N 00 ~• ~ O~ O~ 00 00 00 h h h 'VV v~ vl V1 ~ ~ ~ M M N ~ O ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ O 04 .-..-, .-.....-~ ...-........-. -. r.....-..-. .-..-. .~..-.... O . N 1 ~ ~ O C .C C ri . . w ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 'O o a ~ ~ ^ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N^ .~ M ~D ~O ~D ~D ~O ~D ~O ~O V^V V' ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~D ~O ~O M o ~ ~ ` O~ N ~ ~' 7 7 7 et V ~' 'ct 7 7 ~ 'cY ~ ~ 'cY' er ~ 'ci' N 'O ~ oo~n N = ~ ao ~~ ~ ~ -v,ooooo0000000000oo o z ~ U vj ~`+ .5.'a ,2 y O h ~t M ~ ~O M ~' N O~ M 00 N Q~ 00 ~D ~/1 ^ ~O ~O ~O ~O ~D ~D ~O ~D ~ ~ ~D O 00 h 00 N^ v1 00 M V' M h^ 00 N vl ~O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O V O 00 00 ^ N M ^ ^ 'V v1 h O~ O~ h [~ ~ 00 N M U N U M .--" ..: .-: .-: .-" .-i .-: ~ [~ M O~ N 00 00 N h M V vl ^ h ~O ~O O~ ~O O ^ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~ ' ~ Q~ X ~ ~ Q~ 00 S ~O Q~ Vl O 7 ~O [ v1 .-• h M 7 '7 ~O ~O ^ •--~ ~ ^ V ~G ~D ~O NCn~MUI ~D [^O NNNN00000000 M M v W .. j ~j -- ~--~ -~ •--~ ^ N N N N N M M M M M M ~O ~O O~ N M N O M N~ h M o0 ~ h o0 O^ v1 vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v1 ' ~ „r ~ O O ~D O~ N M N 00 Q~ v1 N V' 7 V M 00 ^ 00 V1 ~ M (~ N ~ ~ ^ O O\ ^ ^V [ ' [~ M f1 Vl vl 00 '~ •-• O , ~ N~ v ^h~t~^O~M NO~et [~R v'I OEM ~'t7 •-•~•..• 00 ,~ ;D-, Q 00 M ~O O 'C M M 'VV DO T 00 N h M^ O T ~ : O 00 00 W h ^ O N O~ T ~O ~ 7 7 00 : r r : v G .. _ . .- .. M M N N N N N N M :7 x a'~1b n~'JaO ~.NMT'nb~o'Ja O'vNM<t 'rl b t~cp q0'r . '~'~'~'~'~'~'~NN O~q O~Q gO~000CCCC000'~'~. ~ ~ hb~aoNO~NM`rhb~~0~0-~.NM V•~ibt~oOgO ^i ~ ;) r D\ 0\ Q Q D\ D\ ~ ~ C C C` C ~ ~ 0 '~ \ 1 1 "'~ `~ `~ 1 1 1 H Q Q Q Q Q Q a N N N N N N N N ~N N N N N N N N N N H N N 1 fi O O r Q U O d O O U Q ,~0 i O a 0 a .~ ~i ~ O Q U O O O O O [ ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ O E cs ~ fi ~ ~ ~ O C ~ Q ~ d ~ ~ •a i O~ `~ O~ .~ O o0 m fi ~ d O O ~ ~ '~ O ~ U ~ ~ O y O y ~ 0 ~i d ~ 0 ~ y ~~ ~_ ~ 4 ~v ~ o ~ obi O d Q, ~ ti4 N 4... ~ O O ~ Q DA O .C ~ Q ~~ Y .p obi ~ ~ U ~ v o. '~ ~_ a. m ~ ~ ~ W ~ O ~ ~~ p -°o O O O ~ ~ Q, ,~ U ~ ~ h O h i1 RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF SCHOOL BONDS TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the Bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD: 1. The County School Board requests pursuant to Section 15.1-227.41 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Code") that the Board of Supervisors of the County issue the Bonds and submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the Bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1994 VPSA bond sale and the Superintendent of Schools or such officer as he may designate is authorized to submit such documentation as may be required by VPSA. The School Board consents pursuant to Section 15.1-227.39B of the Code and Article VII, Section 10 (b) of the Constitution of Virginia to the issuance and sale of the Bonds to the VPSA. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted by the Roanoke County School Board on June 23, 1994. Clerk, Roanoke County School Board \VSA\ROANK\ROANK23.RS2 0-`I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF $1,200,000 SCHOOL BONDS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 ("Bonds") to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Projects") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1994 VPSA bond sale. 2. The Board adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the County School Board to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the Projects from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Projects is $1,200,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. %. -\~ a ~ ~ O ~ .~ ~o~ ~~~ tea-~ .gG~ C A f% O O a ~ b i a, ai ~::. °` W '~ h~ qa ~ fit.~-~l~~Nt~O~~0OOho~~N~O~p~p.M~~~VNO~~ ~~ sfe}O~OOt~hO~(~.-~eroO~OOV~.-~~0~~ L M y~ a ~ ~ N ~,~ ~ r-1 0p 1/7 N ~F N ~O O N t~ ~D a0 ti .ti V~ ~t O~ N o0 M H ~O ~ N~OhhhM~OSha0ON ~ ~ W ~ Y C4 ~ ~ v vvO ~ ~~ M OO~ovOavObvvv ~--i.-i0~0~O~O ~~vvvv --~ N ~ ~ M SO W OO WaOO W 00O00Oa0OOa0a0OO W OO ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v+ ~,p Y y O ho 0~. -~~nOe~~a(~~o 0~. -~~nOa~`OahO ~ .-iaONeteet~NOO~I~h~NOoO[~hMNppoO[~Nl~ „~ h ~O O~ .r N .~ O o0 1~ ~O t 00 ~ z Ca ~ e M .-~ O O~ op [~ ~O st M ~t O+ ..~ N .~ ~. ~, ~, ~, N N N N N N (~ f`~ .-+ .-i .-+ .-~ .-i .~ O co 00 NNNNNNNNNf~NNNNf`~NNNfS~fS e} st : ~ ~'O ~ +~~1 O Qppp 0 0 p Op 0 0 0 0 0 0 pppp O O Op ppo pp O pp ~Og~O 1~O0~o0~~p~~~ N~OO~oOO n~OV O 0 i.~ > ~C p,~ ~" , ~ ~ ~ O~.-iO~l~hNf.-~O~I~hM.-io0 ~D~NOOO~O~N ....O~OOOOOO~O~p~p~p~ppapapppppl~l~l~t~ .-~ -~ ~ 0 O N et °:a ~~ . . .~ .~ W w O ~ ~ Q ' ._. ~~ ~ O~~yy~ O?;~ ~ OVyO~~ONOyyO~~OhOyyO~~ON OyVO~~ONOtyO~~ON SON V1l~ONhI~ONhIwOc~+hl ONh~ O : ' id ~Z7 h a~~iOO..~ ~ .~ O~OO~aOI~I~~OH~ V'MN.-i.-iOO~oooot~~Oy~ ~ <_ W ~MMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNN h ~ h Cr~,~~h~~ ~' '° o b~ ar o',~~o vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv~ ,ort~,rr~t~,t~rrrrrrt; ~rt~rt~r ~ q ~ c ~ ~ ~° off, , i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ a ~ZN w M a i 5~ ~0 ~b ~ o q~ 00000000000000000000 ~oo~voi~,~oc~` ~°n~oo~hn°oc~v°~noc~~°nn O\O P O 0 h a ~ Fes" O p,~+ O~oO ~ h~ h~~MN.--ir-iO0~o000~~01V/~~ v ~~tMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNN ~ h ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~~~ w "~aO '3 ! 00000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 0 c^~ ~ooooo000000000000000 0 0 .-. ~ " O ~ N O~pI~~.-+oOhNO~~OMOt~e~.-iaOhNO~~OM ^"`Ohhh~1'~tstMMMMNNN.~.-i.~OOO ~~ ~ - O + C.po N . c nt . + .-i .ti .-a .-i .-~ .ti .-i .-+ .-~ .ti .~ .~-~ r-~ ~ ~--~ e-r ti .-~ [ tr ~ ~ N ~ N y p~~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ .~.,p~ w :~ oa Q ~ ~ MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ G7 N ~ ~ . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ti e-i .~ .~ .-i .~ .-i .-a .-i .-i .~ .~ .-i .-~i .-i .-+ ti .~ .-+ .~ e ~ i9 M i ~ YVt ~ Q~V~ ~ G O L ~ ~ .' ~ zH~~a ~ ~ 0~ 0 O i i O ~ ~ ~O d' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O h h V 1 V 1 h V) V 1 h V 1 h h h V 1 V 1 V 1 V l h h h h O O e} t7 ffVV .-+ O O 00 l ~ Q O ~(n0 Op,y "~ ~ ~ ~ tt ~ O V~ st t~ N .-i O O~ 00 l~ ~O V^ ^ 0~.~~O~VO~ GO MOO MOOM00 00Ml~NhNl~ ~ '' i OO0~O~oO h~.~-i.~-~ ~-~ ~-~ ~ h- M h M ~ N N ~ ~ Orpp r~4{ ~~ N " a ~~~ . • -~. • r. ~• -+. -~• -~. -+. -~. -+. -+ N ~ ..,~ 0 z .~ ~~QyQ`t V ~ a y p~~M~~OM~NO\MOONp~Cp~ph.-i~--~~O~O~D~O~O ~OOo0l~o0N.-~ V)OpM~pM~,,.yppNy~~pOOOOOO ~OaO W.~Nt~.-+.-~~OhhO O~l~l~ v i ~~'p~"O a ~,Ca ~ w ~topNMt~t~e+~e+~ N V~j.~-+nM~N.~t} Oee}0}o0Nl~M~Oln.-i1~~0~00~~0O'-ie-~ti~~--~ eF~O~p~~•~•~O~a00~hO~t~0[~O~0000a00000 `~ ~'~'~ b(Vt~ett~h~Ot~ONNNNOOOOO ~ > A '~`~r'r'~r+~-+NNNNN1•jchMMM ~., ~ Y `~ ~O O~ N M N O M N ee}} I~ M aO St h ap O ,.y y~ h 0 0 0 0 0 h O~OO~NMNO00~hN~O~t~OMOO.-~a0hst0 O~ t~ P N '~t sf ti O O~ .-~ ti ~O P t~ c~ t+~ V ~ V w o0 ~t .- h~ p w p ~ .~~ ~.-+O\MNO~ l~~hO+ ~~.~ye}.~ ~ o~~ ° M ~vvv ~ ~e '" ~ ° a 4 o ~ o o ~v~c •~,oo OO o o~~ ,n M M N N N N N N .-i ..-i .-i ...i ..r ...~ ~..~ .-i ~ M aQaaaa 'rN~h~th ~~D\ OtiN~h~t41~Ot~op 444R4~444~~ti N ~~~~~~ aaaaaaa~SogS$~oSgooooo000 ~"~'~''~'^'"~ ^a i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~O 4, h C .~o 0 ti b u o ,~ H o bs ti ~ :s ~ ~ a ~ ,~ O ~ h _~ y d O a y tl 3 L y '~ b .s r y V ~~ O C ~ r y h yV ,:Z V \r ~~ u ~ ti ~4 ~ y a . ~ t Y N N (Np O i y ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Q - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on School Capital Projects COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff and the school administration is finalizing the material for this work session. It will be available for the Board at the work session. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ~ Minnix Nickens ~i N a m rn D A a y b n. Q, n b b O w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N b ~. ~. h+ ~. ~+ ~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ O g g g 0 0 g 0 ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O V a~nAwN~.O~00oV MAwN~ S ~ CDV acn~aw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~~~~~~~~bbb~bbbbb ~e~o~o~o~o oovac„{awN~.o~ooov c~,.pwNti~~oaovacn~a r r r r r r r r N N N N N N W W J 00 00 OD O ~N ~ ? O~ C~ O~p~l~ 00 AAA O~ O ~OpO~~ N S ~DOr W JW ~eOi~AV?~NwbrJAJr r A r A A i-+Apo~f/1~FJ~~1~1C~rr~~pp OF+?AtJ~1 W OAMOOrOO WaAa~N W ONwNbaa OOOOOt~tAr OOOJA00 W J v ~°: .+ W W w W w N N N N N r r r r r r r `~ OOC OOtJIJtJtJO~IO~Li~JA~JNO~ Arr + ^~~ ~.~ 00 00 00 00 00~OJa1~.ON~000~OrraO~AA W Jr to N4. rrrrrOO~~DO~O~Jrtnp~W+1N0o0oNrDWJO~ ~"' W(^'~~ ~1~~~~tJOO?~1~1~O~OlntnO~rr4~tJi~+oo0o0A "~" ~Cb-w OOOOOOO~tnNOOrJwo~woocnrNaoJOOO aa.~ a0\O\O\O\rrtAaOO~ONOO W~ON~ W a?W ~ $ ~ ~. Z ~O~ Obr N ~ J J r ~~ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr m ^ ~O Oo~O~0OOrrNN W W?A V1ll~ aJJOOtn""' ~ D+~~O?r~D a JNJNJW OoW OoW OoW OoW OoA ~ 'C.~ p ~ m O O(/1 ~ O O r ~p co O. v~C~~1GO~0Oi-+NNY.-AtI~C~JOO~DOrNN~a?O~ tJ tAlI tnNNN V V NV V V V V tJ V N V ll O ~ p'~b ;7 o~ O ~ ~ A ~ i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O `~ N eyo 2 5- ~ c ~ c g ~ arc °~ ' o ~ A rrF-+rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr [J O~ p~C/1 Oo A JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ~IJ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W CG _ rq ~! y? O `~ O O O JJJJJJ~IJJ~1~1~lJJJJJJJJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~~p~ ~~ p A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ tOJ C~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r~ ,^ , rr~,~ 11 ~ "'G p, p 1 W O OOOrrrN N W W W W AA AtncnNpp~~ v W O~~ONtnOOr~JO W a~ONCnOOrAJ0~0 y ,_„O 11 ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O` ~ p~ ~i ~ O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000000000000000000 o °C~ S~~ N~ "l7 ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ O ~ O G lh J NN N N N N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W A v rrN NO~J0o0o~O O W ~AtoO ~rlr100~ OO~O y ~ p O O ~~ NN NN ,,11 N Np~~OtJJ~OtI~ONOtJ~ONONO VJiOtIiO~ ~~ C "r" O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 ~~ ' ~ Z n r ~ rf r, ^ o o ° ° ~ ~ aaaaaaao~ao~v~aaaaaaaaa-~ ~ ~o ~c ~o ~o ~o ~o ~c ~c ~o ~c ~c ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~c ~c ~o ~o o t'e- v, ~ ~. o ~p v~lvvvJJ V V ~lJ~l~l~l~l~tv:i:~:~a °` 0~OO~ ~~o~~ ~ ~' O ~ O~ ~ V 1 J tJ N N N N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W~ 0O~0 ~ tAa 0o0o~0 0rrN W AAtnO ~vv0o J y ~O~ O N NN NN N N N IJJIOIl~O VJiONO ViOtnOUJiOInOUJiOtnOJ ~Q~O V] O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~~~r r '17 C d N O ~1JJJ000OppOO00~0~0~0~0~OOOOO~0O v r WtoJ r W ttJJAO~O oONAO~OC to J~Or~O ~~yf "~' cb OO~+ p O .~ pp pp p p p S OO SOOOO OOOO O OOJ O~ ~ O O OO O pp A 0o ~J~JNNN~JNNNNN~N!NNN N.~`~NN Orrr rrr~J~J~JN4JtJNtJ W~ W ~i~+N r ~~0 0OO p~ N N vNVO~oON W ~vOroONtAnC~nJ~ONAANO~oN v ~ M ~ ~D p EJO~lAit00l/~~J~O~lAO 0000OVA%+OOIA~~OC~ NCO? P aAAA~AAAA~~~~Ot A-0 i~i~ ~ O .~ . ~ + o O O 00 OD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 OD 00 00 OD 00 00 00 00 O S O O~OO~yO.~Oror pAtna0o0o~0OC~C~C~OOOr N ~•CL~pCS ~ N W OWDAN~A.IpO/~i-N+O-Q+rOWO~vNO~N?NNOro~ J ~~ W p e~~ OV~1O~l~A VJi~J+OJ~~aO V~OOi~pNp~~b W NpOp~~~~ApAp~~ ~ AS'+ Gf.~ O\O\OO0000W WJ00 O~AVINAVI?W O `'~ a f.. `b0 A Q '~ i b a 7d -O+e m O ~. 4 O O O y r , ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-14 AMENDING AND REENACTING § 21-3, UTILITY SERVICE TAX, OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE CONSUMER UTILITY TAX ON CELLULAR TELEPHONES WHEREAS, House Bill 756 adopted by the 1994 session of the Virginia General Assembly amended § 58.1-3812 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, to authorize local governments to tax consumers of cellular telephone and other mobile telecommunications services; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994; the second reading and public hearing was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That § 21-3, Utility Service Tax, is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-3. Utility service tax. (a) There is hereby imposed and levied by the county, upon each and every purchaser of a utility service, a tax in the amount of twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser or consumer with respect to each utility service, which tax, in every case, shall be collected by the seller from the purchaser and shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller for the use of the county at the time that the purchase price or such charge shall become due and payable under the agreement between the purchaser and the seller; provided, however, that the tax herein- 1 above imposed shall not be deemed to apply to that part of the charge in excess of fifteen dollars ($15.00) per month made by any seller of any utility service to any purchaser thereof who uses such utility service in private homes or residential units; provided, further, that any commercial or industrial user shall pay the hereinabove set out twelve (12) percent on the first five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) of utility service. ................. .......:.::...::::: ,.::....: :. ~:. ~ :...:::::.>;:.:.. ::.;:.::.:..:::: .....::::::.c~?:~~ u~~ ~.;:.;;:.~x~.;:.; ::: ......:::::.~~:~~.:~:~~:.: ;;:~:~.~~ :.::.::::::::::::::::::.::.:::.:::.::.:::..: «::<::.;~..~.; ::::::::::::::: :.;:.;the:::::;:.~?~:.::::::::::.;::.;;;:;:;;;;;:.;;:.:::::::::.;:.;:.>;: .;:.;;:.;:.;;:;:.;:. ~:::::::::::::::.::::::::............................. 2 (j) The following words and phrases when used in this section shall for the purposes of this section, have the following respective meanings, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. after September 1, 1994. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- ~=~-LGei~/ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3 cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Chief Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney (two Certified Copies) Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-3, UTILITY TAX, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE CONSUMER UTILITY TAX ON CELLULAR TELEPHONES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,~Mn~~ . G~y~Y~~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The 1994 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted House Bill 756 which authorized local governments to tax consumers of cellular telephone and other mobile telecommunications services in the same manner as other utility services. BACKGROUND' This legislation was the result of months of work by the Virginia Association of Counties' General Counsel, local government officials and representatives of the cellular telephone industry. Delegate Cranwell was the patron of this legislation. The General assembly also passed HJR 160 which establishes a joint subcommittee to identify and examine all local taxes and fees, including the taxation of cellular telephone services, and review their equity and efficiency in light of the changing structure of the economy. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This legislation authorizes local governments to levy a 10% consumer utility tax on cellular telephone service in the locality. The tax applies only to the first $30.00 of each cellular telephone bill each month. This tax is imposed at the location of the subscriber's primary use of the service. In effect local governments will be able to collect approximately $30.00 a year for each cellular telephone within their boundaries. This ordinance amends Section 21-3 of the Roanoke County Code, which imposes the consumer utility tax provisions in Roanoke County. As you may recall with the recent adoption of the amendments to the County Code with respect to the increase of the tax for enhanced emergency telephone service (E-911), this amendment shall 1 l not be effective until sixty days after written notice by certified mail to the registered agent of the utility corporation that is required to collect the tax from the consumer. Legal notice of this proposed ordinance has been provided as required by law. A public hearing on this proposal has been advertised for June 28, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the first reading of this ordinance. The second reading and public hearing on this ordinance is scheduled for June 28, 1994. Respectfully submitted, m, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to code\cellular.rpt Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes 2 7= / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING § 21-3, UTILITY SERVICE TAX, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE CONSUMER UTILITY TAX ON CELLULAR TELEPHONES WHEREAS, House Bill 756 adopted by the 1994 session of the Virginia General Assembly amended § 58.1-3812 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, to authorize local governments to tax consumers of cellular telephone and other mobile telecommunications services; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994; the second reading and public hearing was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That § 21-3, Utility Service Tax, is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-3. Utility service tax. (a) There is hereby imposed and levied by the county, upon each and every purchaser of a utility service, a tax in the amount of twelve (12) percent of the charge made by the seller against the purchaser or consumer with respect to each utility service, which tax, in every case, shall be collected by the seller from the purchaser and shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller for the use of the county at the time that the purchase price or such charge shall become due and payable under the agreement between the purchaser and the seller; provided, however, that the tax herein- 1 above imposed shall not be deemed to apply to that part of the charge in excess of fifteen dollars ($15.00) per month made by any seller of any utility service to any purchaser thereof who uses such utility service in private homes or residential units; 2 P I ~ ** T- (j) The following words and phrases when used in this section shall for the purposes of this section, have the following respective meanings, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after September 1, 1994. code\cellular 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to Discuss Proposed Changes to the Solid Waste Ordinance COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is going to be a much more complicated issue that we might at fast think. I believe the bulk and brush collection will go well and be fairly easy to implement if we do a good job of communicating with the public. The private drive issue wi71 not be easy. I was surprised to learn that we have as many private drives as we do. Many of them are substandazd roads and any equipment larger than a pickup truck will be damaging to these roads. This topic is worthy of some discussion. The issue that I am wrestling with is how to deal with the inconsistencies of refuse collection for condominiums, townhomes and small businesses. On one hand, I prefer not to compete with private collectors. On the other hand, there is an inconsistency in the way we have handled these collections for the past 10 to 15 years. If we standazdize by providing the service we will have to purchase equipment and hire additional staff. This also deserves considerable discussion before making any changes. I hope to get some general consensus and direction at the work session, after which we may need to work on the second and third items further before finalizing the policy. An additional work session may be necessary. BACKGROUND: In the past, bulk and brush materials have been collected on a regularly-scheduled, once-per-month basis. On January 25, 1994, after several discussions regarding the need for more frequent collections, the Board approved the implementation of a new bulk and brush collection program. Under the new system, residents will call for this service. Depending on the day of the month when the call is made, a pickup will be scheduled within a period of two days to two weeks. Each route will have a specific schedule. If the resident calls two days before the schedule for that route, the pickup would be two days later. If the resident calls the day after a pickup, the wait would be nine working days. In other words, each route will be covered every ten working days and the waiting period will depend on when the call for service is made. The number of collections available to residents under this new procedure will be increased from one to two per month and the maximum time a resident would wait for a. pickup would be two weeks. It is our policy to provide regularly scheduled refuse collection, when requested, on any passable state or private road with three or ~J1 more residences. From time to time we have made repairs to private roads where residents have said that damage or wear and tear was from our refuse trucks. In some instances, the requests were clearly valid, in many others, they were not. We recommend that the ordinance be changed to disclaim responsibility for repair work on private drives. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: I. BULK AND BRUSH CALL-IN COLLECTION SERVICE The program is scheduled to begin September 1994. The implementation of the call-in system will require major changes in the regulations and policies currently governing refuse operation. As a part of the implementation process, the Solid Waste ordinance will also be updated to better reflect the nature of the work performed and the rules for service. Staff requests approval and support of the rule changes required to successfully implement the program. Due to the rigid scheduling necessary by this call-in system, the changes, summarized below, must be supported at all levels. Residents must schedule all materials for collection by calling the Solid Waste Division. Residents who do not call in will not be serviced, the material will be left on the street, regardless of whether the truck is on that street or not. The reason for this rule is that we will be promising to pick up the material on a specific date and the only way we can meet this commitment is to schedule our routes based on the calls we receive. If we pick up unplanned material we will be unable to maintain our schedule due to the additional time spent for non-planned pickups and because of the additional unplanned volume of material. Also, if we are to have a truly call-in service, we must get people accustomed to calling in. Only materials specified during the call-in will be collected. All other items will be left and must be scheduled. Items small enough to fit into the container are subject to being left until such a time that there is space in the container. Residents are encouraged to stack materials as high as possible above the container. Only six bulk items will be collected at one time and brush piles must be less than 6' x 6' x 6'. Limbs must be no more than 6 feet in length and no more than 3 inches in diameter. No material from contracted jobs will be collected. It is the responsibility of the resident or contractor to haul away the materials. 2 ~- The materials to be collected must be clear of any obstructions, such as parked cars, trailers, mailboxes or fences. The material must also be free of any overhead wires/branches. Bagged grass will be collected on a call-in basis under this program. Residents should make every effort to place as much grass as possible into the automated container. Enclosed is a sample of the types of tags to be used by staff to notify citizens when their material has failed to conform to the rules of this program. A variety of methods will be utilized to help educate the citizens on the new program. Staff plans to use mailings, notes in water bills, television, newspapers, radio and any other media available for the notification process. If the Board approves this request, the ordinance will be referred to the Board for First and Second Readings, July 12 and 26, 1994. II. PRIVATE DRIVE POLICY The Solid Waste Division policy is to service any passable state- maintained or private road with three or more homes. Repairs to often sub-standard private roads have been made in the past, based upon the citizens claim that refuse vehicles were the cause of the damage. Costs for repairing private drives averages about $2,000 annually. Due to an inability to determine whether the damage is caused by refuse vehicles or normal wear-and-tear, staff recommends discontinuing the policy of paying for repairs on private driveways. If residents on a particular drive do not agree with this policy, an alternative for them is to bring the refuse down to the nearest state-maintained road to avoid having our vehicles on the private road. some private drives are currently being serviced with a pickup truck and only large items of bulk or brush are brought down to the nearest state-maintained road. It is our plan to use only small collection vehicles on private drives in the future. In connection with this change, the staff considered discontinuing refuse collection service on private drives. However, due to the large number of such drives, approximately 500 drives and roughly 1300 customers, we felt it was not feasible to discontinue the service. Included in this category of customers are also some very large private-drive sub-divisions such as Bridlewood and Fort Mason. III. METHOD OF COLLECTION There are approximately 1200 private, individually owned 3 ~- i condominiums or townhomes. We provide service to about half of these. The remaining units chose to contract with a private hauler for dumpster service. Staff has incorporated the ability to service the remaining units, if the request is made, with automation as the preferred method of collection. In the past, complexes have requested service other than what the division currently offers as the standard residential curbside service. Staff requests the prerogative to determine an adequate level and type of service for these units and any departure from the standard level would be labeled as premium. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests approval and support for the specified changes in policy relating to call-in collection of bulk and brush, private drive policy and townhomes/condominiums. If this request is approved, the ordinance will be referred to the Board for First and Second Readings, July 12 and 26, 1994. SUBMITTED BY: Gardner W. Smith, Director Department of General Services APPROVED: ~' ~,c., Elmer C. Hodqe ~- County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson Rohinke Minnix Nickens 4 . 0 .. '' w--i ~ bA i w ~ ~ ~""+ o ~ O o a~ ~ ._ w A • ~ b O ~~ ~.+ ee ee O .~+ O ~ [~ '~+ y w c.. L L ~ ~e .~ ~ O O~ O ~ Os' y y ~3 L C ~ ~,,,, _. ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ O y w ~ ~ ~. ~ a -••~ v ,.,,., A -a c, `~ Caro ~' s .~ ~ ~ `-' ~ ~ Z O~ ~ x vs ~ ,~ ~ ~' s^ ~ y ~.a ~ o a. ~ ~% ~ ~W ,y, ~ '''' ~ ~c ~o•L i~E _3 'e a ~ Woo :w O ~ ~ .r wr ~ ..'~"r ~ 'h+ ~ L CV' L V ''~' 3 y VJ ~ ~ y C N +r i"' CG y O ~ r ~ CC ~ .C ~ R ~ y CL .. r >> eC ~ ~ ~ U O ~ O ~ ~ z >~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ O L+ C~ U Q ~"~ ~ ~ ~ l c~ O a W W ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o -o ~' O~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ ciU., U~ ~ o z~ ~ ~ _ • .., _, O U ~, ~ _ ~ _ Q ~ O ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ .a y ~ ~ z ~ ~ N~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _~~ ~ ""' ~ T U rn ~ U ++ y 'L7 ~ ~ ,s: ~ ?~ O 4, ~ ~" O O .a ~ y '_'" ~ U O O .L7 ~ ~ cC 4. j i.. ~ +.' O U O~ O ti O N ~ ~ O O ,1] ~~ ~• ~ ~ ~ p w V1 ~' ~lF .x. y ~, * 3 = i~ C~ 'o. ROANOKE COUNTY SOLID WASTE DIVISION BRUSH COLLECTION ~,.~~-' ~ Date: Your brush was not collected today, because: Too far from the street. Too close to parked vehicles, other obstructions or overhead wires/ branches. • Longer than 6 feet in length or larger than 3 inches in diameter. Pile larger than 6 x 6 x 6. • Too small for brush collection, please place in container when space available. Mixed with debris or trash which must be separated from brush. • Suspected that brush was cut by a contractor, which must be removed by the contractor or the resident. We only take the amount of brush specified when the call was made. Other Thank you for helping us to serve you more efficiently! Questions? Ca11387-6999 County citizens may haul pickup truck loads or less of material to the transfer station FREE OF CHARGE! ROANOKE COUNTY SOLID WASTE DIVISION B ULK ITEMS COLLECTION ~- Date: Your bulk items were not collected today, because: The items requested for pick up were: Too far from the street Too close too overhead wires branches Blocked by parked vehicles Not to be found We take only the items you specify when you call in. NO more than six (6) items will be collected at one time. Trash and small debris is mixed in with your bulk and must be separated. Concrete, building materials or any other construction or demolition debris will not be collected by the County. No materials resulting from a contracted job to include construction, remodelings, renovations or installations will be collected by County employees. Other Thank you for helping us to serve you more efficiently! Questions? Call 387-6999 County citizens may haul pickup truck loads or less of material to the transfer station FREE OF CHARGE! SOLID WASTE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 20-1. Definitions. ~~ The following words and terms, as used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: ~- Be3~~:asze~ttea~s aarh,~a ~~~ --~- +- • ~ ~. ~w ~ -~-L-~r~~n~rr~ crarca~S , z~v~~crrc~'36-~-~~ ~~~e--S#~S~?~ee~S 6i~-~3~ ' ~r zTreTa-des-,aid eh a r~iPa £a.~r~re-~kB e~T-mr~-'r3~i'acazzii-vr-B•t-~i$i~ ~-spa=~ e-s~re~as a~e~~; e~}~e-b a a~~--e f r ARTICLE II. COLLECTION BY COUNTY Sec. 20-21. Article not applicable to Town of Vinton This article shall not apply to residents of the Town of Vinton, Virginia, an incorporated town lying within the boundaries of the county, since the council for the town has provided for solid waste collection for the residents of the town. (Code 1971, 14-7) Sec. 20-22. Responsibility of county administrator under article. The administration of this article, including the establishment of a budget for providing effective solid waste collection service; the hiring of all employees necessary for providing such service; the billing of persons receiving such service; all other matters related thereto shall be the responsibility of the county administrator; provided that all matters pertaining to the establishment of an annual budget and the establishment of collection rates and charges shall be approved by the board of supervisors. (Code 1971, 14-5) Sec. 20-23. Right to and application for, service. All county citizens, including businesses, firms and corporations located in the county shall be entitled to receive solid waste collection service consistent with the provisions of this article, subject to the determination of the county administrator regarding economic feasibility of providing such service to any particular location. Any person desiring such service shall make application through the office of General Services. Payment, if required, for one-quarter year's service shall be made in advance at the time of application. ~ u ~ ~ae•~Fy,-~r~ ^Pi-~ r~-~ ~d , a :: ~. ~ mo ~ ~ f ~ ~~e ~ ' } ~i . , ~ o ~~,-, j ..~ - ra -e~~e~E~-, -6i~-e~-a~r 1 u ..v. ~ i ., i. .. ~ a- ~ ~ ir Esc'bs=d~~a~-be-de€~ d- e -as-~ a~~j-e-~S ~-l~e, r~e~rt a~~~e~a-l-ez ~-i $~5~ ~=s a~~ e~- -~-e~- -e~-r -~6i~^ rr ~ea e~--a ~ c.~.~}is a-- ~~sr ciT ~ ~ ~ c+- 2~~e- ~ Et~ksi~ e ~~~-~e- ~ i~ ~~ u ~-t~-es e~- r -~ ~ - e- e ea-~-~Te€~s e ~ ~ ~e~re nhvs~e~ ~ e~- ra~r - 3~ m ea~s~ } a e~. ' e~7-a ~~r ~.._.. "~" ~"' ~ ~ ' ~ g -e ~ ~ ~ s b ~ ~e-znc =~e,~r ~egt~-~a~--~ e~e~re-~ a ~e€t~e-- - e a ~ ~ ~ s- ra- ~~ a~ ~e~e ~ o ms ~--~e~ ^,,, .., ~ ....~:.. ; „m xe ~--@~ ci ~ €~rs e-ne-~ S3~~3--e ~ ^~ a e~e -- e~e -~ a~ e-e ~~ ew ~ -TOT-~o~-e e ~~~ ~ e~e~-- ~e~e ~ ^ , ~ ~~sp~e 7~e-p~ ya~-~ ~ re~ ~~ep~~~re ~ ase~re ~ ~ J / pe-ee~a-i r~e~-i~e~l ~ ~G Q ~, -~-ar~c~~P; TG~r ~ f; ft RTTCr~e ir F i -i[C ~i S~~ d ~ y~ CCT~ V Gl l i yes-~~e~s cis-~-e~~es ~~~~ 1-fy ~d--s-~ ~ee~ 3- ~ a~ g~-e-Te~e }-e~e~e- l ~~e- c .~~e ~e~es- ~ ~~ ~ s e~~ess ~t-~~re ~ ep~a e~es- e~r~c~--e~~~ e~sc~- ea~ege~es--spa- ~~be a- --~e3-~-e~wsr- ~e~ ~ - } = Eer~rarr ~~ T ~ -~~$ c ~s~t-~s-s-~~ e e~~e- s~~ ~e~~ s ~~ ~-a~~~ ~e~-e~ w~-ee~e „R ~~ ~7 ~7 ~~~~ r'SSSITCD ++ '~TI*'1'"DT 1 T\ c'U2 rr~TTL'~V" *T'I ~f: ~ ~~t~,s;--~~8 -- ~e;a~~ - ~ g e spree-~e ~'=e~rse~----^~.~.^,~ ' s~-~s~ k-}~ ~ ~~ee ~-s m~-~~e ~ a s s t h ', t t r~r, ` l !1 ~ ~ i.• • } • • ~ 3 ^ ~ ge~e~a-t- g~e~~„ere ~~ ' ' ~ T * u- , 6i 3 9 ccr~6-~1~e~3S@ • e~e~~ ' ' } ^ '~ ~ l l L. C '~ ~ ZR~ T C- GT SRZT ~^ ee3~e~- " l TS.7'-C[I[Ce ti' Air- cr x£rr~ ~e~-~-~i~~a~e-c e3Tee~-en 1 7 --~~ ^~s-~er wee}' ~ -~5-_ ~ n ~~e~--~ee~' ~9 ''-i~~ .. ..~e~-,~ee~t ' ~ .~~ ~-6--3~i~-~e~ree~ ^ 9~9 3~--3~s-pew-oa~ee~t ^ ~~8 ~-~ge~,e~9~s-e~-e~a~e~~i -~ - ~ } ~-cr~~r r6~~-~?e~-E'F ~ -6i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ea~rs~eT-..~ee}~-e to ..~.. i i ~ ~. i ~T~3~~-~9H-P~~,6 ~8: ~- g ~pr~crxu~z-~~a~ a-~vrr~~zrvrr ~Ei~eA~ • A~TEi~-'~~-~ ~ {' ~ ~ ~}~}cirrai-c'a-~rv-nv~~cE~ ~ ~-3~-~~-6rraiT~if@ ~ ~~ZZT~7 c~if4Q'C-TS"~~~'~~I~.~ E"'CG~B~ ~h 'l r ~ P ~ ~^ m n n ~ r az eT~-6i~Z 6i~--~E-~9~334~e--~3-T~-~-~c cc~ ~,n ~-- ~ n n n €,~ez i 'f~3-~~e~e~~-rem-~A eta-ages-€c~=-~-r~ ri e ~rs~? - ms--- i ~eage~e~s Ee~t ~es~- ~ ~ # e -ems ~ c er.- -s~~ e-~e-e~~e ~-te a=-s a~ i~e~ ; -or -~€€e~t-}tee d a ~ r- m~,~~s-ee~e~--s~a~-fib , , F~ ~a . ,::. Sec. 20-24. ~pecz~xc cv~7.ect~on categvx'a,e~: .~"t~" y ~ha1~.;i prav~d~ e~nce ~~~<w~~k ~ur~s:~~e~rr .~ ~~ Sec. 20-25. Supplemental collection service. ~- -(~- n„ ; ~ ~~ElL~crr5 ~ Sam z-cc5z~ 'a'~n'"i~~" ~ ~A e-~3~3~~~3~~-@5~f~ 10 Y ~e~€~r« e~~~ ~r a t ~l ~ ~ ~ r ez- s~ e~--,~ eta-~} ~s -s-t ~es a~rd~~ e~ -fie . ' € a " , ' ' e,7' f i i-4~~=-ee s el}a~re-t-e Ti[:~ ~Hm ~:- 3'cc' ~ ~rt~ ,~~a trite ~- ~.. -: a~ ~~- -e~ee P~ g we e-T-3-}~ -r~eh^e ~ ~r T-6~-~=e}~~ rr- cs„ rs1+ ~ ,,. '-~ a ~'~ - f'-t'5 ----~na---z zr~rr ,Ee- i •.a c c~~--~7 ~ 'P ~S p ~~ gs~a-~t -~e~se - , ,' ~ ~. ~ ~'Tri-~r~e r A 1 1- c n r 11 c...,. ~i n PC~- {-° `-mad-a~ ~, -i~a- ~s . . ~ ~ ~ -~~ e~~ ~~ a-~-i~ res . ee~ty p; ~~ „i `' ,,~ A= ~~ e~~~-deers-- ~ta~e~ra-~s ARTICLE III. RECYCLING sec. 20-40. Recycling reports. (1) Definitions. Generators means any entity whose act or process produces solid waste as defined herein. Manage means to collect, store, treat, transport, and dispose 11 of solid waste as defined herein. Principle recyclable materials means newspaper, ferrous scrap metals, non-ferrous scrap metal, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, kraft paper, container glass, aluminum, high grade office paper, tin cans, cloth, automobile bodies, plastic, clean wood, brush, leaves, grass, and arboreal materials. Recycling means the process of separating a given waste material from the waste stream and processing it so that it is used again as a raw material for a product, which may or may not be similar to the original product. Reused means once having been a waste and being: (1) Employed as an ingredient (including use as an intermediate) in a process to make a product, excepting those materials possessing distinct components that are recovered as separate end products; or (2) Employed in a particular function or application as an effective substitute for a commercial product or natural resource. Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material, resulting from industrial, commercial, residential, mining, and agricultural operations, or community activities, but does not include: (1) Solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, (2) Solid or dissolved material in irrigation return flows or in industrial discharges which are sources subject to a permit from the State Water Control Board, or (3) Source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Source reduction means any action that reduces or eliminates the generation of waste at the source, usually within a process. Source reduction measures include among others, process modifications, feedstock substitutions, improvements in feedstock purity, improvements in housekeeping and management practices, increases in the efficiency of machinery, and recycling within a process. (2) Report requirement. All nonresidential solid waste generators and companies that manage solid waste or recycle materials generated within Roanoke County shall submit an annual report to Roanoke County. The county will provide official 12 reporting forms which can be obtained from the solid waste office or the office of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The report must be submitted to the Department of General Services--Solid Waste Division by December 31 of the current reporting year. (3) Report substance. Each annual report required to be submitted hereunder shall include the following information with respect to the reporting party for the period covered by the report: 1. The name and address of the reporting party; 2. The total quantity of solid waste (a) generated, (b) managed, and (c) recycled by the reporting party during the reporting period; and 3. The total quantity or volume of solid waste that has been the subject of source reduction or reuse as defined herein. (4) Report basis. Any report required under this section shall be based on actual volume or weight. Where actual volume or weight cannot be accurately determined, the volume or weight may be reported using carefully estimated data. Any such report shall include a description of the basis for the reported data. (5) Proprietary protection. Nothing hereunder shall be construed to require any party to report information of a proprietary nature. Where any party fails to report any information otherwise required hereunder based upon a determination that such information is of a proprietary nature, the party shall specify in its report the nature of the information withheld and the basis for its determination that such information is of a proprietary nature. (6) Local generation. The report shall include only those solid wastes generated within Roanoke County, excluding the Town of Vinton, both in terms of recycled material and material disposed of in the landfill. (7) Civil penalties. Any party not reporting the required information or otherwise not complying with the provisions of this article shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100.00). This civil penalty shall be payable to the General Fund of Roanoke County. In addition, any party not in compliance with the provisions of this article may be denied access to or use of the solid waste disposal facility serving Roanoke County. (8) Effective date. This article effect from and after ~:~1.. ~ ~ ^^~ _ 62591-9, 1, 6-25-91) ~ shall be in full force and (Ord. No. 13 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-12 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session f ; AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-13 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE, BY THE APPROPRIATION OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL WHEREAS, environmental remediation expenses at Dixie Caverns landfill exceed currently appropriated and available funds, and it is necessary to amend the adopted Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget and appropriation ordinance to provide additional expenditures for these purposes; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-162.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, requires publication of notice and a public hearing if an amendment to the budget of a local government to increase the aggregate amount appropriated exceeds one percent of the total revenue in the budget or $500,000, whichever is lesser; and WHEREAS, notice of this proposed amendment was published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the County reserves the opportunity to reimburse itself for these expenditures from the proceeds of a future indebtedness, if the Board of Supervisors so chooses; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994, ~~t~_ ____~'' _ _~a-„" J ~~~~~ BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 r ~ 1) That Ordinance No. 6893-2, the appropriation ordinance for the Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget, is hereby amended by the appropriation of the sums to the following fund for the functions and purposes authorized and approved by the Board of Supervisors as follows: From Fiscal Year 1993-94 General Fund Unappropriated Balance $1,068,300 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1993 228,363 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1994 153,337 Board Contingency for 1994-95 50,000 Total $1,500,000 To Dixie Caverns $1,500,000 2) The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of environmental remediation at the Dixie Caverns Landfill from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such costs if $1,500,000. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER *~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing and Adoption of Ordinance to Appropriate $1,500,000 toward Expenditures for Environmental Remediation at Dixie Caverns Landfill COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County is in the final phases of communications with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) related to the environmental remediation at Dixie Caverns Landfill. It is anticipated that the County will greatly increase the expenditures and effort in this area within the next month. Based upon our preliminary estimates it is necessary to appropriate $1,500,000 toward these expenditures at this time. It is recommended that the appropriation be made from the following sources: Fiscal Year 1993-94 Fund Balance $1,068,300 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1993 228,363 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1994 153,337 Board Contingency for 1994-95 50,000 Total $1,500,000 Because of the large dollar amount included in this appropriation, it is necessary that the County hold a public hearing and adopt the attached ordinance related to this appropriation. In addition, this appropriation includes the necessary reimbursement language that would allow the County, if the Board so chooses, to include this expense in a future bond sale as long as the bond sale occurs within 18 months of the completion of the cleanup. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,500,000 will be appropriated for Dixie Caverns Landfill as shown above. ..,> ", STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At the conclusion of the public hearing staff recommends adopting the attached ordinance appropriation $1,500,000 toward expenditures for environmental remediation at Dixie Caverns Landfill. Staff further recommends that second reading of the ordinance be waived due to the emergency status. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approve~sby, is ~ ...~`'AA~. I / J[((I{,: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To O Minnix Nickens s- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE, BY THE APPROPRIATION OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL WHEREAS, environmental remediation expenses at Dixie Caverns landfill exceed currently appropriated and available funds, and it is necessary to amend the adopted Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget and appropriation ordinance to provide additional expenditures for these purposes; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-162.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, requires publication of notice and a public hearing if an amendment to the budget of a local government to increase the aggregate amount appropriated exceeds one percent of the total revenue in the budget or $500,000, whichever is lesser; and WHEREAS, notice of this proposed amendment was published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the County reserves the opportunity to reimburse itself for these expenditures from the proceeds of a future indebtedness, if the Board of Supervisors so chooses; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994, and the second reading was held on July 12, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 ~- s- ~ 1) That Ordinance No. 6893-2, the appropriation ordinance for the Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget, is hereby amended by the appropriation of the sums to the following fund for the functions and purposes authorized and approved by the Board of Supervisors as follows: From Fiscal Year 1993-94 General Fund Unappropriated Balance $1,068,300 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1993 228,363 Insurance Dividend Check for June 30, 1994 153,337 Board Contingency for 1994-95 50,000 Total $1,500,000 To Dixie Caverns $1,500,000 2) The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of environmental remediation at the Dixie Caverns Landfill from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such costs if $1,500,000. general\amend.bud 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE, BY THE APPROPRIATION OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This item on the agenda has been reserved for public comment on a Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget and appropriation amendment. This public hearing and first reading of an ordinance will consider the appropriation of funds for the environmental remediation of Dixie Caverns landfill. BACKGROUND' State law provides that when a county, city or town amends its adopted budget to increase the amount appropriated, and if that amendment exceeds one percent or $500,000, whichever is lesser, then notice must be published and a public hearing held on the proposed amendment. The proposal will result in a budget amendment and appropriation of funds not to exceed $1,500,000. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Additional information on the proposed ordinance will be available for Board review at the meeting. Respectfully submitted, 1~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 1 S -/ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to general\budamd.rp[ Action Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINIS' TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-15 AMENDING AND REENACTII ~~SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF CHAPTER 18 "f DISPOSAL' OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 14.5 FOP 1995, AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 29a 1995-1996, AN INCREASE IN THE CONNECTION FED AND TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN TRANSITION PROVi- IMPLEMENT SAME WHEREAS, the water and sewer operations of Roanoke County a_ maintained as separate enterprise operations, so that the expenses of the sewer fund are paid from the revenues and fees charged to the users of the sewer system; and, WHEREAS, immediate sewer capital needs over the next two fiscal years of approximately $2,500,000 have been identified; and, WHEREAS, the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plant expansion to be designed and constructed over the next three years is estimated to be approximately $13,000,000; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has determined that an increase in sewer rates and charges is necessary to fund these necessary capital improvement projects; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 2.01 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, and Section 15.1-876 of the code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, legal notice of this increase in sewer charges has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County on June 7, 1994 and June 14, 1994; and, 1 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June. 14, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1, That Section 18-168. "Schedule of Charges" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: 2 3 ..............................:: •::::::::: v;::::::::::::: ;;:.y;::};:..•i}:viiiiY'4rii:}}j:+:}; }.;y ~~:: ~iq'F.:.j;i:?(: i::;: "•:>•>;:yii:::>.~.:y:;i:;:y}y"r:%'i':'ii:>:.:: ?::.. .: ~:: x~.::.;:~~~::;.;:.;~.~.::;:~:~:.~~.~:.;;::~:~:.:::::~.:::.:;:>:: :::::::.::::::.::.::.:::..;:.>::.:;;.::;:;::.:::.:::::::::~:::::::::::::.~:::.:............................... C~:~~:~~::~ ~.:.;;~::::.;:~::::.;;~: ~ :........ kZ ::"`5:7;:~%`~::~:::;•:::c;::;;;;:.:":::i:.:::;.:::.>:;i''2:::i ;::::::; :::'"":~ ~~i:::;:;::; ''>;:•~::;5:$$;::::"'+:' ::'':~::: ' "::;::: f:~:. `'";::.`~..:~fi:?>:.::j~~::.yyi`:,>~::y:::::::::,.,!:y}«r~:~'''::iff:~?:~~7y'tw,^,.~.~ ~t.;,.~~::{ty;. ::: ~:..::.. ~ :: i:'t't:i : '.i:.i:~+:~.{.~.,:»:.>s:. ~. .~.µ: ::::::::~{~ :: :• :.>~'}::::i::: `. i:::::~.~i4'~::::>i::~t`:;{4i.~ .......... ..........:::::::::::.................: :.:::::::. :. :.. ~:.:»??:~:3+FAr'k~:::.»:M;.~rw,.,.;:~:::<3w~,.4tF..~I..:>::i~~;:::.:.~:.:::::::t.>:.»:.»>:.>::;: ::.::::::::::::.:;i.::.::.>i:t.>:~:.::.»:•::::::::. ~.: ~::::::::::::::::......... ~'~;`~C~ k3 T1~' .,..:.: ,~ The director of finance is authorized to adjust utility charges arising from filling swimming pools with water when such water is not introduced into the sanitary sewer system. Any such adjustment shall be limited to once per year, and be for sewer charges only. The director of finance may promulgate regulations to implement this adjustment procedure. e `~~~~ For those customers that are sewer customers only ( ) ~`~< and do not have water meters, sewer is billed at an estimated usage of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons per month for commercial customers and eighteen thousand (18,000) gallons per quarter for 7 residential service. Such rates or charges shall be based on the schedule of charges established in this Ordinance.-?T~~i~-93=~• ..:......:.................................................................. . 39-9-~ 7`><f<><~ ' . On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Peggy H. Gray, Clerk General District Court Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Gary Robertson, Director, U9ility ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Second Reading of an Ordinance to Increase Sewer Rates and Sewer Connection Fees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~~~ BACKGROUND: On May 24, 1994 the Board of Supervisors had a worksession to review the future capital needs of the County. These sewer capital needs included the immediate County capital needs of $2.5 million and the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plant of $13 million. Various methods of financing this expansion were discussed at the worksession. The first reading of the attached ordinance was June 14, 1994. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following proposal is the best alternative to fund the future sewer capital needs of the County. 1. Increase in sewer rates a. Effective July 1, 1994, there will be a 14.5% increase in sewer rate. b. Effective July 1, 1995, there will be an additional 25% increase in the sewer rate. 2. Increase in connection fees a. The connection fee will increase from $500 to $1,000 effective September 1, 1994. b. The connection fee will increase from $1,000 to $1,500 effective September 1, 1995. As a result of our meetings with the Homebuilders Association, we have developed the following method to assist them in this conversion of the connection fee. 1. Existing lots of record that have paid 25% of the existing $500 fee must pay the remaining ($375) 75% by August 31, 1995 or the remaining fee will be based on the new fee of $1,500. 2. Site plans in subdivisions that have filed a preliminary plan to the County and have paid 25% of the existing $500 fee not later that August 31, 1994 must pay the balance (75%) by August 31, 1995. 3. Site plans and preliminary subdivision plans filed with the County after September 1, 1994 must pay 25% of the new fee ($1,000) and the remaining 75% by August 31, 1995 or the remaining fee will be based on the fee of $1,500. -T-"2 FISCAL IMPACT: The rate increase and connection fee increase outlined above will insure that we have adequate funding for the current sewer capital projects based upon our current estimates of the costs of these expansions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After the public hearing, staff recommends approving the second reading of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ - Received O Johnson _ _ Referred O Kohinke _ _. To O Minnix _ Nickens _ _ "'.2.- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168 "SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF CHAPTER 18 "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 14.5% FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994- 199.5, AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 25~ FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996, AN INCREASE IN THE CONNECTION FEE FOR TO $1500.00, AND TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN TRANSITION PROVISIONS TO IMPLEMENT SAME WHEREAS, the water and sewer operations of Roanoke County are maintained as separate enterprise operations, so that the expenses of the sewer fund are paid from the revenues and fees charged to the users of the sewer system; and, WHEREAS, immediate sewer capital needs over the next two fiscal years of approximately $2,500,000 have been identified; and, WHEREAS, the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plant expansion to be designed and constructed over the next three years is estimated to be approximately $13,000,000; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has determined that an increase in sewer rates and charges is necessary to fund these necessary capital improvement projects; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 2.01 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, and Section 15.1-876 of the code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, legal notice of this increase in sewer charges has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County on June 7, 1994 and June 14, 1994; and, 1 -Z WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Section 18-168. "Schedule of Charges" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: ~EW~R RATS ..... ................. _. ...................................... 2 i -2 ;:.;:.>:. >:::::.. >:;.::.:>'~h+~::bas.a::c::::~wzec~:.::~~>>~~e:<o .~..a.::::::::: ~.f..f ;: ; ~:.~.. ~:::>:::~~ ~:~,1;~, ~:~.:~s ::.:.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::.::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;;:::::::::::::: ............. ........................................... ................................................................... c3~ ~ewex sys~~~,,; ;... ~,,a~a.z) t7~f`~-sa.t~ anal esvex'~~z~d 1adie.::~~'~d'?~::pt~~:zcy+... T- ~ ...:::::.... ::::::.....:::::...... x i.v Th'+~ ~a~~~d. off... ~u ~r~~s~~~::: mad::::~~;thQra~e>~.~<::::.:::>:::>` x.::.i:.i: ;::..:.;:: . mlaur.~em~z~t"'::~. rye~i+ant>>::>~~t.:::<>:'a,r ~::.i:::::i::[:i::}::: '.::::i:::i::i::i::i::i::::i::i:":i::i::i::: ;::~::::i:?i?i?i;:i;:i~ :::'::i::i::i::i::: :::.::.:i::i:i ~: .:.......::.: .::::.:::::.....::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.:::.i:::.i:.i:.i:.ii::::.i:.:.is:::.:'::.i:::.i:.i::..i':.iii:.iii::.i:::.i:.i:.i:.i::'::i~':i:1::i'::i::x':.:i::i::i:::::: _. . ...:::.:::::. .::. :........i:. »•- - ..::;. ....,: x., . ,ice ` ::: .::. `:::::~tta:.::>:::::~J~;::[:>~P :f;:r~'~:€:€:}7:.:: :owner.:~ .; .~::~:~~::>::>~cz~;.>:::~~~...s~~.~..:<€~,~~~.~~~.:.s >:<vaha~.:.;::>i>i:.::.>:::.;:;~;::.:i::::iiiiiiiiii::::::>::> :::... .......:~` i ;~:.i.~g.:>i>i:.:...:.i.: >;>;>i:.;.:...::.:..;.:>;>i:.; ..., .....::::.:...:::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.,;:.;:.i:.;:.;: ii:.:,.... ,,.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ;::::::::.;:..:.:.: ::::::... the !~~un~~,. az~d,, h~ch arm:. ;nv~> > ,i,>> ; :. ~.:>:> :.>:>:>::>:>:>:>:::.;:;::>i>i:.i>i:.i::>i>i:.i:.i:.i::.. >i>i>i:.i:.ii:. ov~~s3t'~d 1`z~~ cred~.t pal!icy.: ::::::::. i~::.i ..:...::.:::::::...:..;:.;:.i:.i:.i:.; ~u~ The total. corinect`a:on fee ~ha13. >kae<ispa~d a::>~sl7:v~s .............................. ap? ~~~ s i~ny ~,andowx~.~r :,:m~;~;'~t.::~~:.~ :~p~:~r~ i ::::::::::: ::.: ;.:::::.:::.....:..:.::.:::. :. req~e~t.>a.n w~r~.t~ng on fox-ms pxova.ded.b~. tYe county;; ~+a` b a~~raed x ....: i;:.i:.i:.; to make payment on the 'a~~'-sa.te' ~aca.l ~t~es f~~ `port~~~;; ~a~ tie!. i:::>::>.:>;:>::::..:::: . canne~tijan fie, in t1,i.~rty-s ~.~, (3 6 ~< ~t~rnth~y in~~all.znents ~ pca~~:dee~, ................... .................. that :! ................ ...... .......... ,.i.: ::::::. ~.~~...'::>Th~ mount a~ such fee:"shal.~. use z:z3,~~~a'sec~ y twenty T- 2 ................::..................................... ~;:. i:.::.:'.:.:'. :.::.::.::.s::: ~::.::.: ~:.::. ga~merrts ::~z~.....the :game? manr+~~.: ~s p~ov~de~.....f©r ~~~ ~G~~~n ~~ ~e~re~; .;:.;:.; :.:.:..:::::.::.. ae~'`~;~~":~h~~g~~ oc~ether via.th'' gather znean~ ;a~ ap=t out.. Vin` tki,~:'sew v< .................................. .................................. .................................. ................................... ;:::. ~~en ~.n~ta~~:e~.: ::::::. ..:::.;:.:. .... . :. ,: ~f~ '' ............................ i,) 'the bQa~c~ ,'cif superv~vrs: may b~ x~so~.ut~.Qrt waa~e ~. ;::.;. porta.can cif ~h~ :connects on' fees' for'sewer :~aaa;~:`~~.es ~nst~t~:~~~l:~t~i~.~~' federa~>»or' state >fund'ed sewer ' r©'~cts> Th~,;p~rr~~.~xn ~?~::::t~~:?:'fe~~: .. ... • x r is wa.av~d.:~ha1.7. be ,~nda.c~ecl a;~,:~Q~~t~ f~nane~-,al.< p~~~~`~~pa~~~:;~x the sewer p~~a~ ect t 'T .2 ~ ~ ~ } .::'the fi~v~~d.... o ~> :::....:: ~~'.... >::>::>:<.>::>::>::>::»::::»::>:.»~ ~:.;:.;;:::.::.;:::~:.:;;;;:.;::.;::.;;;:.;:.;:<:.;:::::::::;::::::::::; ::.. Ba~zc Connection Fee.'::; _... the' bask cvnnectian fie a.s $~?OE} L~t7 end' ~nc~i~~~ RQ~n~~e t : `ersvnnel'_ ::~ns~alla.n :;:thy.;:::: h ~~:c~l:. ta;F' tcs:~he`sew~:~:'~n noun Y: .P >_ :: `~ ::.::;;: ;P.: ~.;:.;:.;;.; : ~~ter excavat.i©n,', b~. the ~u~toner,>' '~'~~`> ........................... .......................... t)~~;~~`:~~~ Fac~.lita.es....Fee, ~~~ ~~l~><I -~} ~!j The director of finance is authorized to adjust utility charges arising from filling swimming pools with water when such water is not introduced into the sanitary sewer system. Any such adjustment shall be limited to once per year, and be for sewer charges only. The director of finance may promulgate regulations to implement this adjustment procedure. e For those customers that are sewer customers only ( ) and do not have water meters, sewer is billed at an estimated usage of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons per month for commercial customers and eighteen thousand (18,000) gallons per quarter for residential service. Such rates or charges shall be based on the schedule of charges established in this Ordinance.~:o-~i~~~. ~~) Transx.ton provisions. 7 / -~ .~/ ~~e ~'. .......................... few `:a.~` e!ffec~ ~t that time.. `; {~-~ (lj< The provision of this Ordinance ~''~^'-° and the rates established hereby shall be effective from and after dam; ;,::. 3393 iTul,y. ~-, :,!. 39 ~ 4' . r T-ate AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168 "SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF CHAPTER 18 "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 14.5% FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994- 1995, AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 25% FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996, AN INCREASE IN THE CONNECTION FEE FOR TO $1500.00, AND TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN TRANSITION PROVISIONS TO IMPLEMENT SAME WHEREAS, the water and sewer operations of Roanoke County are maintained as separate enterprise operations, so that the expenses of the sewer fund are paid from the revenues and fees charged to the users of the sewer system; and, WHEREAS, immediate sewer capital needs over the next two fiscal years of approximately $2,500,000 have been identified; and, WHEREAS, the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plant expansion to be designed and constructed over the next three years is estimated to be approximately $13,000,000; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has determined that an increase in sewer rates and charges is necessary to fund these necessary capital improvement projects; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 2.01 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, and Section 15.1-876 of the code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, legal notice of this increase in sewer charges has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County on June 7, 1994 and June 14, 1994; and, 1 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Section 18-168. "Schedule of Charges" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: (c) The schedule of base charges for residential, commercial Uo~.um~ Gk~arge .. Per:; 1B00> Gallons :::;«:::<:::>:: a ~;~ .. $~.SJ:C COIIA~Ct~:~7$~>~~~:. 'X.'~1~ ~~5~~: CDt'-Q~~QiI' ~~~'• ~a (a.;~,) Dff-site facilities fee. The Off szte'faca~.zta;'es ti,i) Off=s~.te ...and.,, ovex'sizec~ ~~~e. Cx-ed~t ,pal~:cy,. >A :::...::..:.... coz~rzectzon fee !. a.n thxrt~r,, s ~t.3C. { ~:6) mc~nthl~ ,~nsta~~znents r p~o~t~.c~ec~ ................... ................... tha:> ................... ................... ................... ................... (j The amount of such fee sha~.3 ~e a.zacxeased: ~iy twent~r ................................................. ................................................ {z~j:percent;: {iii} The county shah. have the z',ight2; tQ collect such payzitents in the same manner as provided ~~_ ev~.lection o£ s~we se~viCe Charges together with othex` means~s set out in the setter ............................. ............................. contract.' (~) Thy: board of supe~u~.sers mad blr ~esalu~~.on waa.we ~ pax-~.~:on v~ the conne~t~.on' fees far: sewer ~ae~:~.~,~~:~s: ~.nstall.e~t txnde .:.:<.. fedex'aI, o~ state funded sewer ,prv~ects the po~tzorr' of the fee ~ha is wazv+~c~ shaJ.~. be a,nr~icated as county ~a.~~~e~.a~. partz~xpa~~.a~ ..i.x the ;'sewer ..praj ec~.' (~ ~. ~ The .board o~ superv ~s,Q~~ ma;~:~?`««~~ ..... ~'eso~.~it:i~on,: ~g)j ~~''nlm~m connect~.on ~~ee, The ma.n'mum> con:nectgn fee f4 Basic Connection' Fee'. .... The...; basic `connection f`ee' is $1Q0.0`p and ~nalud.es >Rvaz~uke Cotuxty personnel installing . the physzc~~....t~p tta the sew~e~><fialy: after exeavatzon' by the customer ........................... ~'a~~'e> .......................... .......................... .............................. '~a~?l e< .......................... ............................. .............................. -{~} (':} The director of finance is authorized to adjust utility charges arising from filling swimming pools with water when such water is not introduced into the sanitary sewer system. Any such adjustment shall be limited to once per year, and be for sewer charges only. The director of finance may promulgate regulations to implement this adjustment procedure. (e) ;(j,'.~ For those customers that are sewer customers only and do not have water meters, sewer is billed at an estimated usage of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons per month for commercial customers and eighteen thousand (18,000) gallons per quarter for 7 residential service. Such rates or charges shall be based on the schedule of charges established in this Ordinance.~;~-~i-~-9-3-x. (~~` Transitozi ~Prvvsions. . .... .... ..V.:: #,'~.~ the sewer >' connect~pn fee ~~:se~*t~:ce eq~a to cane eguzva~.ent x~e~a:dent.~al sewer conneat~.an,, o~ ERG shall:>~:ncr+eas~ .... .: from $5fla.Of?; to ~1, 0,40.OQ effecta:'ve Segtembex~ ~. 194. and shad. increase t~ $l, 5,'OQ. 00 effeet~~te. S'egtember ?~;;;~»;~i995.. {~.a? : Far singXe famz~.y '!~.ots off: e~~r~. prz wha.ch twen~ effect ;at `that time.>>' .. ,.:. (za.i} ', Owners~applicants~-that have fz~.ed a gre~.~.m~.nar at that.;<.:t3:me::> ................................................. :%:>..::iii;:>:<.::.::>,::;:;.:.::~,:;.::.,:;:;:a.::;::>:::;:;c::>:::, ::::`>:: :.;: ~:?":::ii::?;";:i:ii:~ifS.^.;%:;:.: ~ .. ~::::>~>'>::':: ~.:i::2>::: ;~<~><<4wne:r~..a::: ~..~.pant~..t,.~,at have::f~~~d`a.p?~~... a.m~:x~ary..~~te ~~: suk~da~v~szQn..; .~:ar.. vn!.'ax ~:~t~r: 5e teanbe~r€>::;~ °>;~:~:~4:>€<s~a: .>:::.~ ;: .~ ......::::.:...:.::..................................................::.:::::::::.:::::.::::::..:::::::.....:.:.:::::.:::.::::::::..:...P.:::::::..:::::.::::............~.........:::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~.::: I~ ......................................................................1~.. .....:........................................... twent~r five ~25~k~ percent of,, the cann.eet~.an ~~~a~e£~ect at that t~.ne and the: remaa.r~~~ . se;aent f~.Ve:.> :?:5°~~ :ge~~e#~:of ~h.~.:$;Ir~~f~ ~~e ::..:.:.::::...:...............................................~ :.......::::::::::::.::: I'.:::::::::::::::::.:.:. ~::::.::::::....:...:::::.::::::..:::..........:.........::.::.:::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::.::::.:::::; on vx ~efare ,august 3;'1, a~95 x ar >the re~tan~ng fee ~~~~.~. be the difference ~aetween the amount preva.',ously paid anc~ the`~~e ,gin e~fec at_ ~fiat..;t~.mer>. ................................................. .......................:......:................ ................................................. {~} ',~',('~1' The provision of this Ordinance *T~. ~''~"'-" and the rates established hereby shall be effective from and after d~-}~; ............................................. ....................................... 31}~ Judy 1; >.I994. 9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-16 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.34 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5670 STARREY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 87.19-3-38, 39) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF MAUREEN E. POPLSTEIN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 28, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 7, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.34 acres, as described herein, and located at 5670 Starkey Road, (Tax Map Number 87.19-3-38, 39) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Maureen E. Poplstein. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Va. Route 119, said point being 304.4 feet north of the southerly side of a 30-foot road; thence with the easterly side of Route 119, N. 24 deg. 19' E. 151.0 feet to a t point; thence N. 27 deg. 19' E. 39.0 feet to a point; thence leaving Route No. 119 and with the line of the property of the Central Baptist Church of Starkey, Virginia, S. 68 deg. 12' E. 902.0 feet to a point on the line of Lot 15; thence with the-line of Lot 15, S. 24 deg. 05' W. 210.0 feet to a point on the line between Lots 12 and 13; thence with the line of Lot 15, N. 65 deg. 55' W. 500.0 feet to the place of Beginning, and being all of Lot 12 and a part of Lot 11, Section 3, Map of Southern Pines, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book 2, page 136. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney /-.'" PETITIONER: MAUREEN POPLSTEIN CASE NUMBER: 17-6/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 7, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 28, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of Maureen E. Poplstein to rezone 2.34 acres from R-3 to C-1 to operate a training and development office, located at 5670 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if the Bradford Pear trees are part of the screening. Staff said that they are a part of the screening and additional shrubs will be required. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carved with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Witt, Ross, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _, Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _, Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton, cretary Roanoke C my Planning Commission ~- STAFF REPORT Case Number: 17-6/94 Prepared by: Janet Scheid Applicant: Maureen E. Poplstein Date: June 7, 1994 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioner proposes to rezone a single-family residence from R-3 to C-1 to accommodate a professional office. The existing house is approximately 1000 square feet. The property is in a Core land use designation which encourages office type uses. The general area is a mix of R-3, R-1 and C-1 uses. Several other houses on Starkey Road have been converted to professional offices within the past several years. staff does not believe there will be any significant negative impacts of this rezoning and does not recommend any proffers. B. DESCRIPTION Petitioners property is located at 5670 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The petitioner is requesting that these two parcels be rezoned from R-3 to C-1. She proposes to convert this existing single-family house to a professional office to conduct a consulting business. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. The C-1 District allows a wide variety of office uses by right. 2. If the building is expanded or if interior renovations are proposed, building plans must be reviewed prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. If these two parcels are combined as one, a plat by a certified land surveyor must be submitted. 4. Site plan review will be required. 5. If this site is hooked up to public sewer a sampling manhole will be required. 6. Entrance permit will be required by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 1 ~-3 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - Petitioner's property consists of two lots totalling 2.34 acres. 2. Location - Property is located at 5670 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District and Community Planning Area. 3. Existing Conditions - The 1,000 square foot single-family house on the property has been vacant for approximately one year. Attached to the house is a breezeway and a garage. The lots are very level. 4. AccessJTraffic Count - Current access to this property is via a private semi-circular driveway. There is not a recent traffic count for this portion of Starkey Road. In 1986, the count between Crescent Blvd. and Buck Mountain Road was 3,804 vehicles per day. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Petitioner proposes to convert the house to an office for a consulting business. 2. On-Site Circulation - The concept plan depicts a semi- circular driveway providing ingress and egress to this site from Starkey Road. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. 3. Landscapingf ScreeningfBufferinct - Type C screening and buffering will be required per the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Credit will be given for existing vegetation where appropriate. 4. Public Services - This property is currently hooked up to public water service. The house is not hooked up to public sewer, but this service is available to this site. The proposed development will not have significant impacts on these services. 5. Amenities - Based on the size of the existing building to be used as an office, four parking spaces will be required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This area is designated as Core. in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Office uses are encouraged in Core areas. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the suitability of multi- 2 T-..~ family and single-family housing coexisting with commercial uses with appropriate street design and landscaping. PART III STAFF CONCLIISIONS During the 1992 comprehensive rezoning process, the staff proposed that this area of Starkey Road be C-1 to implement the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommended R-3 because, if rezoned C-1, the single-family residences in this area would have become non-conforming uses. It is staff's opinion that there will be no significant negative impacts as a result of this rezoning action. Staff does not recommend any proffers. 3 // G.,~ era// use nn/v data received' eceived by: applie n igp: J C/BZA date placard ued: BOS date: ~ ~Q~ ~ ` Case Numbs : ~ / ~/ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ~ REZONING CJ SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: I~R UREEN ~ ~oPLSi Es/~ Phone:~c3-))5r-71S/ Address: Zi Code: ~ ,ya~'- Owner's name: ~A V~ p 9f- N A N ~ J' ~'ov L T r ~ ~ ~~ G~ RGS~~GW CL RC~.E Phone: ~ . Zip Code: Address: ~sry b o ~ - V A ~ 0% location of property: Tax Map Number: ~ ~, ~ 9 ~ 3 ~- 3 9 3 s ~ ~o s-A R KFy ~ ~ Magisterial District: C~iiti S/~k'.T. /'rL Roo rv ~ K C, V (~ .~ y0 / y - Community Planning Area: ~~ ~~ SP~l ~,~~, Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: k' -3 .~. ~ ~ acres Existing Land Use: ' sq.ft. RE S L ~ c N iT A ~-- Proposed Zoning: C- ~ For srsfl use only Proposed Land Use: Uss Typs: Cc SPACc OFF: ~, ............................ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements o f the requested district? YES / NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Typet YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. NS V Consultation Application Justification COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (7031772-2030 era v us v 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the o /w Owner's Signature: i'l~'LCtiulirC~ ~ `_~c0'C~ ~-~~ ~~ JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING Applicant: Maureen Poplstein Location: 5670 Starkey Rd. Roanoke, VA PURPOSE To establish an office in the current facility for Training Unlimited, Inc. (Training and Development Company). Modification to the exterior of the property will be: • Painting • New roof • 4 Parking areas adjacent to the garage • Bradford Pear trees along south lot line. •~• ENHANCEMENT TO THE AREA Residence has been vacant for 1 year or more and it needs work. Our planned renovations will increase not only the value of the property but the cosmetics of the - surrounding area. Although the current structure will continue to have characteristics of a residential home, the office renovations will blend nicely with adjacent business properties and surrounding residence. •~• HOW DOES THIS CHANGE FTT INTO THE CORE PLAN? Office use of this property is Consistent with core designation. (This property has been used as a nursery in the past). Continued.... ~~ ~CK ~u~ ~QART-'~1 En( TS -- f EK~ST~NG~ - ro i•e• . _ ~ (~OD'D~ G~mo~c,,, ~a o~ _ '~ ~o L.t // ~ . t /2 ---.~ ~ L.~ •/1 ~ '~gl•-9 -03- 38 ~ 57. t9 -03 - 3~ s c' 3 I '~~ - ~ - .Q ~ ~} Paooose0 W ~ j r s ~~ J ~ ~ fr' ~ ~i~ivl. ~ ~ a' Ler ~3 - ` L.~i t .a' @ ~ - ~~ Ti = . c 1}ornF G ~ i ~ •~ y ~ C3 q (' S ~ ~ 3 ~ S~~ro SrAR-~f ~ . y ~,weaD ~ Q ~,t ~°~!22 --.v:~~~,E ~, --~v~4~ ~~'~ - - 3044' ~i. .E'~ //9 ' ~/~/37 O-S¢~ Plot Map \ Applicant: Maureen Poplstein Property Location: 5670 Starkey Rd, Roanoke, VA 24014 ~~ .<o^ --~. „o . ~~" ~-- Lof /o h k o N h V N ~ o. .h ,~ ~ '~ 0 ~ '~ C ~ V ,(, 07~ / S S 2 4 °- O S' W-~- 2/O.O „o•_ _ Lot // ~ of /2 s c.3 0 h M M 0 n Q` M I M 0 i ri b e~e..d, Lei /3 ~ ,~ 0 ~ 0 h 0 •N V S u.~° YE y FO.E' G . .E'. PETE.eS ~` BE.E' Th~fJ Y/.e6/NiA PETE.eS _ OF LOT /2 ~PA,~°TOf LOT //, SEG. 3, ti1AP OF SOUTi~E,2N p/NES P. ~. 2 ~s. /3B ,E''o~7~/O,rE LD., `i9. ~trJRi 7~OS ~or/~Lf: /~ ~ <<r~ En~r, J~o .~ ~ 7~cr~~ S7.ly_o3- 35+39 ~ i~r y .ia o ' X .h ~ o ~0 n ~ t T 3 o'.eoaJ 39.0' .¢./.0 iic. O .wre 1,..~ ~~ 7O L'1~22p N27-°/9E -•-,y24'- /~ E' - - 3044 -.-- ~ ~. ,~~ //9 ro s~~l~er-r NB./37 0-589 ~~ --._.._ ROAHO2CE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTM$NT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ~~ Date Y~IS~gS~ --, - Name of Applicant~AU('~itr~ POPI S~c~~ Phone `77Y- 77S/ Address of Applicant 5 3 p ~ S / ~VP~,-~'o ~ 1[ p Ro~,~O ~.e; a 5`Ol y Name of Developer S~b rr,~, Phone - Address of Developer _ Name of Design Engineer FJ OrJ~ Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person I^n~~r-~~ (-~oPC,SiE,~ - Name of Proposed Development • d-~`~',c ~. ~br ~Ra~N,r+q (,7NC,im~ % 4~ S,c ., Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) , /~/O lV ~r ~c,V2lopme~ p~ fPnt _ ~.02~c.~y ~o i ?Cu.~/ ~,~ ~xnn~~X.o~ _ /~/n N~C.tJ CJ'Ti L~ I ~r ~/00 K -CIG~ ~' 1~xTF.nJ'i•a~r~ /T~cri!1'7~- :l:r/J^~ ~- ~~G=e, •. Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY of MAP AND ~PLANIMETRIC NUMBER) ~`~ 6 78 S'T-,c 2 c~ ~ Rn - -- Size of proposed development in acres: ~•3 ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum JO feet MSL. Maximum ~- feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? _~_ No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. 1 (OVER) ~~ L ,rt. // ,~Z r , .(~/l. . • - ~ ~ /Signature of pplicant ..... -~ ~ oq` .~,~ ~ a -~U_ ~~ ~ a-• a.~" f~S ~~i ~ ~~~~4~ ~s~44 ~B~.L~p'f ';SOUTH~Rt~i~iGE~' e d o ~~e4p1 4,pr yi w a 904 ~k ~ ~~ 7'9 x137 \ P ~P `.../ e2,!O ` 7 ~ a1~.~P' ~9LS~ I~:~ ~-~~G'y ¢ 3.1T' ~" ~4~'Altl pP~ ~}• HE RM I~: ~ ~~w y-dp Q o RO. W +~ o T V ; ~~,. ~, `^' G . v+IP~ ..T~ / ~ ME~'NLARK' ~ Wpa '~ ~ 9 CR I ~ ,. • ~ , pQ t p ~ O ~ o ~.• 63 FA •~ ~ ~ 'p?v~ Cf 58 E~F.O~R+£5T-..... / ""'~~ ~g'~~ <ap~ ~ 0 61 S;,;R:KEY m EK ~ I ~ ~N~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~oR. ~ ~~~¢ ~? RT ; ~ ~ ~ o ' 1300 ca o- ~ ~~~ ~ % ~ .• _~ .,,,Q ~ VICINITY MAP ~' ~ 27 -!'a 33 34 ~ ~ z 36 Ac ~ ~ 35 NORTH ~ ~ ~o n my 26 / ""Op~ J/ ~ r ."~Vi 'oor t ~t • p. • , ~ o ` 'o' n •~ ''a3 25 ~ y ~ O T3 ~ yb ~ ~ .j° ~ ' „s r / r•e c \ ' 'a.. o r< ~ ~ ~ \ oJ~a 31,t t6~ n ~, ~ ~ ,~ o I O y ~ \ / c o `o 0 32 •0p„c„ 4•Z ~, , 6AC yr~~ 24.1 > 37 ` ~ o ® ~ rjJ ey C, ,, d •4 / O 3 . 2 r y wry. • r + n 4 : t+ 6: ~.,n , 39 =U • u rP~ `. 1 '' / 3610 r r 69/s . 39 ~ tiati y ~ •r 4, . T•01 / 35 ' 9io a a~ : 1 •33 ~ -? ''• / ~ 1.26 Ac ~ • • < ~ ..~y - ~ r ~ 1 1.26 Ac , '3.32 r]O ~ s ~ 4 / r• ~~ ~ o ~ ~ 3sls 37 , ~ r ~. a / ~ t s Ac > 00~A ~ ~C\rrol Boor~rr Cnurcn \ ~ ~ / o , t C b y ~ ~ goo •a / s ~ .. ~ ~ bL B ~ ,+ 40 usk ~ • 1.24 AC •` p ~ +sy~ Yn ~ s 40, ~ 45 ~; ~:: 41 49 y ~i I OQ AC / ~•` ~L iy ~ ~ - ~~9 ~y i ~ ~~ ~so3 I ~Jl f ~~ I 1l1 ~ . / \ J ¢ 48 42 / I.00 Ac ~% ~ 41 ~! ;. ~ 42 ~\ ~~ ~ Buck Run Court ~a 44 - Q e .63, ~ ~- .~„ ° f ~~ .~ _ ~/ i 1 ~ . L ..>o~ 3 ql ' ~z 7 ' _ (f(„/~ $ M _ UNTq/,t/ R1. 679 -~ ~oAD ~,~ ~ '_'_ ~ ~ ,~. s 47 A~ ~ 7+ ~ '~- i 3 a6 d ,.~ r. ~ J ~"' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA'G ~ririonlEQ' Maureen ~. ~D~/SfeJr~ ~_ AND ZONING ,~EQ1/EST.~ rezone ~3 fo C/ .~ , ,_ . TAX MAC ~: 87 /9 - 3 - 38, -39 ,.,, T ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.34 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5670 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 87.19-3-38, 39) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF MAUREEN E. POPLSTEIN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 28, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 7, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.34 acres, as described herein, and located at 5670 Starkey Road, (Tax Map Number 87.19-3-38, 39) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Maureen E. Poplstein. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Va. Route 119, said point being 304.4 feet north of the southerly side of a 30-foot road; thence with the easterly side of Route 119, N. 24 deg. 19' E. 151.0 feet to a point; thence N. 27 deg. 19' E. 39.0 feet to a 7 =~ point; thence leaving Route No. 119 and with the line of the property of the Central Baptist Church of Starkey, Virginia, S. 68 deg. 12' E. 902.0 feet to a point on the line of Lot 15; thence with the line of Lot 15, S. 24 deg. 05' W. 210.0 feet to a point on the line between Lots 12 and 13; thence with the line of Lot 15, N. 65 deg. 55' W. 500.0 feet to the place of Beginning, and being all of Lot 12 and a part of Lot 11, Section 3, Map of Southern Pines, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book 2, page 136. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning\popLstei AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-17 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A RELOCATED PORTION OF THE SAME EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SECTION 1, LARELAND FARMS WHEREAS, by Deed dated March 1, 1977, Ezera E. Wertz and Elsie M. Wertz conveyed to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor in title to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia), a sewer line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across a tract of land owned by the Wertz's, in connection with the sewer system designated as "Interceptor from Nottingham Hills to Castle Rock West, Section 1"; and, WHEREAS, Lakeland Developers, Inc., subsequently subdivided and developed a portion of said tract of land into Section 1, Lakeland Farms, as shown upon the plat dated November 17, 1977, made by T.P. Parker & Son, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123; and, WHEREAS, the above-described 20' sewer easement is referenced, but incorrectly shown upon the subdivision plat as an "existing 15' san. sew. esmt."; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the northern 2.5 feet of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional 2.5 feet for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20'); and, WHEREAS, the relocation has been accomplished without cost to the County and meets the requirements of the Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994; and a second reading and public hearing was held on June 28, 1994; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (easement) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interest in real estate renders it unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, conditioned upon the exchange as hereinafter provided, the northern 2.5 feet of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, owned by Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, husband and wife, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of an additional 2.5 feet for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20') be, and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 5. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, or their successors or assigns; and, 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 62894-17 authorizing the vacation of a portion of an existing 20-foot sanitary sewer easement and accept a relocated portion of same easement adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote own/Tuesday, June 28, 1994. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CURVE RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH DELTA CHORD CH. BEARING ~A ~ 275. 00' 24. 06' 48.00' 10° 00' 03' 47.94' S 78.36' 10' E S 130 8.89' 3g ~ / p. \\ \~~ CYNT 849:410F TO / (So. H ~q DR. LAKELAND DR. CURS RiIN) E ~~ __~// A S 83°36' 10 E 15' TELE. ~ Q~~ p• ELEC. EASMNT. ~ ~-~_ I _ _ ~, ~ _ A ~- _ 30' MINIMUM V, BUILDING LINE.J;' } ~ ~` / I q) ~ ~~ I_ OT 2 N ~ I ~ ` N I Ir tL .. ......... 2. 5' ~ o O `........... OF S. g cD N ~ \ \ ~ 'r~..BE.YAC I ~ M ~'... ... g.rEo EXISTING 2 ......` S.S.F BE'D~07.77. ..`N........ .... TO ~.. ••-....... ZO' SANITARY •..~ `..... fD~CATED SEWER ` "" ESM' T. `.........., h D.B.1060, ~~•~~• N PG. 824 LOT I "" 0.313 ACRE w Es ~ •'"• "~ r c ~ ~. BLOCK 2 NEs 10 DRAINAGE EASEMENT--- I BRANCH ~. ... ~ '~ D eERq R T>r OoF ERA X34. 34. 8 ~ ~ P~~RTZ S >S r _ °oo w ~ -~ ~ ~~ . -o=m ~ ~ O n ~_ ~ cn r _ r c:. cn N _-, ~ .~ ~p ~~ O ` ~ o w ... ~` ` I 1 '~ NOTE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD INSURANCE ZONE °X° AS DESIGNATED BY THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN LEGAL REFERENCE: DEVELOPMENT. P.B. 9 PG. 123 TAX N0. 76.03-4-22 SURVEY FOR ;t'1E~~ThQr SHELDON SPENCER JACK 6. BESS ` SHOWING THE RELOCATION OF 9ANITARY SEWER ~U~Y EASMNT. ON LOT I,BLOCK 2, SEC. I, LAKELAND FARMS ~1M~ "o~• EY ROANOKE COUNTY, V I RG I N I A ~ SCALE : I ° = 20' JUNE 13, 1994 1070 ~~ P, LAND `~ BY: JACK G. BESS CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance - Authorization to Vacate a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement. The Sewer Easement in Question is Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The record map for Section 1, Lakeland Farms dated November 17, 1977 shows a 15-foot sanitary sewer easement; however, the easement obtained by the Roanoke County Public Service Authority dated March 1, 1977 calls for a 20-foot sanitary sewer easement. When the residence was constructed, it was apparently sited assuming the easement was 15-foot wide. This causes the dwelling to encroach the actual 20-foot easement by approximately 2 feet. This encroachment was discovered during a recent title search for the sale of the property. An Ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of an existing 20-foot sanitary sewer easement and to accept a relocated portion of same easement on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms. The first reading of the Ordinance was held on June 14, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT' All costs associated with the adjustment of this easement will be handled by the parties associated with the sale of the residence. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Ordinance after the second reading authorizing vacating 2.5 feet of the 20- foot easement on the north side of the existing easement and an additional 2.5 feet be added to the south side of the existing easement as shown on the attached plat. Staff feels that the sewer line can still be properly maintained with this revised easement. T- ~ SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robe tson, P.E. Utility Di ector Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~~ ,. -,~-~/ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A RELOCATED PORTION OF THE SAME EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SECTION 1, LAKELAND FARMS WHEREAS, by Deed dated March 1, 1977, Ezera E. Wertz and Elsie M. Wertz conveyed to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor in title to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia), a sewer line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across a tract of land owned by the Wertz's, in connection with the sewer system designated as "Interceptor from Nottingham Hills to Castle Rock West, Section 1"; and, WHEREAS, Lakeland Developers, Inc., subsequently subdivided and developed a portion of said tract of land into Section 1, Lakeland Farms, as shown upon the plat dated November 17, 1977, made by T.P. Parker & Son, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123; and, WHEREAS, the above-described 20' sewer easement is referenced, but incorrectly shown upon the subdivision plat as an "existing 15' san. sew. esmt."; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, _; WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the northern 2.5 feet of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional 2.5 feet for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20'); and, WHEREAS, the relocation has been accomplished without cost to the County and meets the requirements of the Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1994; and a second reading and public hearing was held on June 28, 1994; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (easement) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interest in real estate renders it unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, conditioned upon the exchange as hereinafter provided, the northern 2.5 feet of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, owned by Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, husband and wife, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of an additional 2.5 feet for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the T- y southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20') be, and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 5. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, or their successors or assigns; and, 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. CURVE RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH DELTA CHORD CH. BEARING "A' 275. 00' 24. O6' 48. 00' 10° 00' 03' 47.94' S T8° 36' 10' E S ~3 e 6' • 89 \`E ~ YN r P 49. 40F T-~ C(/ (5p. Rl w)DR, LAKELAND DR. RVE .A„ -~~ ~,, / S 83° 36' f 0' E 15' TELE, i ~ Q f ~ 0' ELEC. EASMNT. ~'~ I \_ \ ____ ~-_ _ 30' MINIMUM j d. __-DZr BUILDING LINE., } ~ ~ O O Q7 ~ ~ ~ -` ~Z` LOT 2 N -- ~' -v 2 ~ ~ N I ~~O P` \ ` ~ p T I ~ .' ......... 2. 5' OF ~ ~ r cP o O ~ ............... S. S E. 'Q cn . rv \ ~`......TO BE- V M ~` ....,.AOgrEp ` I N n ~ ... OF g S W~ X07'' ` •... ......... W ,n EXISTING 2 ••....`~( ....... f' 9F D ....N~ ,......... O> ro ZO' SANITARY ~..~....... ED~CATEp ~ O ~ SEWER `.......... ` ESM' T. `........... ~ (+ m o PG. B24 LOT I "•~ _ 0.313 ACRE ~••~""' ~' b NEK' Est r ~ .. ., W i~ BLOCK 2 ~ ~N~s ~~ IEASEMENTGE \ I BRANCH .. . ~ ''• N ~3e3 D ZFRq FT y OOF R~ Y34~ 34, ' @, 8 ~ ~ p~~RT2 S ~5 NOTE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD INSURANCE ZONE "X" AS DESIGNATED BY THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. LEGAL REFERENCE: P.B. 9 PG. 123 TAX N0. 76.03-4-22 SURVEY FOR ~E--Lrli~ _ SFIELDON SPENCER Jt><(',KS(l~' BYESS ` EASA9JT.INON TMoTRELBLOCK102. ~ ~ANi TARAKELAND FARMS ~~M'~ oJ• EY ROANOKE COUNTY, V I RG I N I A SCALE: I" = 20' JUNE 13, 1994 ERTIFICAT No. BY: JACK G. BESS 1010 ~g Jt~ CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR LAND `'~'~P I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 ORDINANCE 62894-18 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY THE ENACTMENT OF SEC. 4-4, DEFINITIONS, SEC. 4-5, RECIRCULATION SYSTEM, SEC. 4-6, WATER TREATMENT, SEC. 4-7 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS, SEC. 4-8 SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SEC. 4-9, GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS, SEC. 4-10, OPERATION, SEC. 4- 11, SECURITY, SEC. 4-12, SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND SEC. 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS, ENFORCEMENT. PENALTIES TO ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS OF PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS AND A SCHEDULE OF FEES. WHEREAS, Sec. 32.1-248.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the state Board of Health to promulgate regulations to require the daily posting of water quality test results at swimming pools and other water recreational facilities operated for public use, and said Board has submitted such regulations for public hearing and comment as a precondition for its adoption of those regulations; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2826, adopted effective April 14, 1981, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors deleted the entire Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools," of the Roanoke County Code upon the understanding that their previous adoption of the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code superseded the county code provisions dealing with construction of swimming pools; and WHEREAS, the mentioned Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools" also contained Article III. "Operations" provided standards for operation of swimming pools and criteria for their inspection; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public health and safety of the citizens of the County of Roanoke, Virginia to continue annual inspections of swimming pools by the Roanoke County Health Department; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994; a public hearing and second reading was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article I. In General of Chapter 5, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 4-4. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Agent: Shall mean a legally authorized representative of the owner; Disinfectant: Shall mean the chemical that disinfects by inhibiting, neutralizing, or destroying the growth of harmful microorganisms; Free residual disinfectant: Shall mean the amount of measurable chemical remaining in the water following disinfection; Health Director: Shall mean the Health Director of the Roanoke County - Vinton Health Department, or his authorized representative; Operator or Manager: Shall mean the individual or individuals responsible for operation and management of the swimming pool; Owner: Shall mean any person who owns, leases or has signed 2 a contract to own or lease a public swimming pool; Swimming Pool: Shall mean any structure, basin chamber, or tank, located either indoors or outdoors, containing an artificial body of water intended to be used for swimming, diving or recreational bathing, and having a water depth of 24 inches or more at any point. A spa or hot tub regulated under Article VI "Spas and Hot Tubs" of this Chapter shall be excluded. Public swimming pool: Shall mean any swimming pool, other than a private residential swimming pool, intended to be used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and operated by any person, whether as owner, lessee, operator or concessionaire, regardless of whether a fee is charged for such use. The term "public swimming pool" includes, but is not limited to, tourist establishment pools, pools owned or operated by condominium, private club or association of persons, apartment, or any association of persons. The term "public swimming pool" shall not include single occupant tubs and showers used exclusively for therapeutic purposes. Sec. 4-5. Recirculation Systems. (a) All equipment shall be maintained in satisfactory operating condition during the operation of a swimming pool. (b) The filtration system of all swimming pools shall have sufficient clarifying capacity so as to permit the main drain to be clearly visible from the pool deck at distances up to 10 feet in a horizontal direction from the projection of the drain on the pool surface. 3 (c) All filters on swimming pools shall be designed and installed so. as to provide easy accessibility for backwashing, operation, maintenance, and servicing. (d) All filters on swimming pools shall be designed and installed with the necessary valves and piping which may be needed to drain the filters and piping completely. (e) A permanent waterproof specification placard shall be conspicuously displayed on or adjacent to the filter and shall be adequately lighted. Specifications shall be printed or typed and readily legible. The following information shall be included on the placard: (1) name and location of facility; (2) date of construction; (3) capacity of gallons; (4) water surface area in square feet (square meters); (5) turnover rate in hours; (6) rate of flow in gallons per minute; (7) swimmer capacity; (8) pool operating procedures to include: a. instructions on proper operation of pumps and filter; b. instructions on proper cleaning procedures; c. instructions on proper backwashing procedures; d. instructions for emergency procedures to be followed in case of contact with hazardous chemicals. Sec. 4-6. Water Treatment. (a) Pools, when open or in use, shall be disinfected continuously by a chemical disinfectant which imparts a residual effect and shall be maintained in a non-acidic condition. (b) Pools, when open or in use, shall be disinfected using a 4 chemical feeding device capable of maintaining an easily measured disinfectant residual. Manual feeding of disinfectant chemicals is prohibited except as provided in §4.9(a), (3) & (4). (c) Chemicals other than chlorine, bromine, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, muriatic acid, lime, soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, aluminum sulfate, calcium chloride, cyanuric acid and sodium bisulfate shall not be used to treat pool water without permission from the Health Director. (d) Chemical water quality standards for swimming pools and wading pools: (1) Free chlorine, combined chlorine, bromine and pH values shall be continuously maintained within the following ranges: Minimum Ideal Maximum Free chlorine residual parts per million (ppm) 1.0 1.0-1.5 3.0 Combined chlorine (ppm) None None 0.2* Bromine (ppm) 2.0 2.0-4.0 4.0 pH 7.2 7.4-7.6 7.8 *Remedial action shall be taken by the operator if combined chlorine exceeds 0.2 ppm as it will result in reduced chlorine efficacy and increase swimmer irritation. a. If pool water disinfectants other than those above are used, residuals of equivalent disinfecting strength shall be maintained. b. If chlorinated cyanurates are used as pool water disinfectants, the cyanuric acid levels shall be maintained within the following ranges: Minimum Ideal N~mxn cyanuric Acid (ppm) 30 40-50 60 5 (e) Pool water shall be maintained in a slightly basic condition as indicated by a pH of not less than 7.0 and not greater than 8.0. (f) Pool water shall have a total alkalinity of not less than 50 ppm and not greater than 150 ppm or a water balance between total alkalinity and calcium hardness that is neither scaling or corrosive. (g) Other disinfectant agents or methods may be accepted after they have been demonstrated to provide the equivalent disinfection of chlorine and are readily measurable. (h) Test Kits: Acceptable test kits for the easy measurement of all required water chemistry parameters in these regulations shall be provided and maintained at each pool. The test kits shall be capable of measuring the disinfectant residuals accurately to within 0.5 ppm. (i) Microbiological Test: When the Health Director determines that bacteriological samples are required, the quality of water in the pool shall be determined to be unacceptable by the presence of organisms of the coliform group, or a standard plate count of more than 200 bacterial per milliliter, or both, in two consecutive samples or in more than ten percent of the samples in a series. sec. 4-7. Water supply systems. (a) Water supply systems serving swimming pool establishments shall comply with the Waterworks Regulations and/or Private Well Regulations. (b) The water supply distribution system shall be designed, constructed, and maintained in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (c) Where drinking fountains are provided, they shall be of an angle jet type with adequate water pressure at all times. Sec. 4-8. Sewaqe Disposal. (a) Swimming pools which have showers, water closets, and lavatories shall provide an adequate and safe sewerage system. 6 (b) Sewage and waste water shall be disposed of into a public sewerage system or by a sewage system constructed and operated in accordance with applicable law and regulations. (c) No untreated or partially treated sewage, liquid waste, or septic tank effluent shall be discharged directly or indirectly onto the surface of the ground or into the public waters. Sec. 4-9. General Safety Provisions. (a) All chemicals, cleaning compounds and similar materials shall be stored in a cool, dry, and well ventilated place, out of reach from children and preferably in a locked room. All chemicals used in pool water treatment shall be stored in their original containers. (1) There shall be no smoking in any areas where pool chemicals are stored. (2) All persons while handling pool chemicals which may be strongly acidic or basic, or which may be strong oxidizing agents, shall wear protective eyewear and other protective clothing as deemed necessary by the Health Director. (3) No harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form shall be added manually and directly to any pool water except under emergency conditions. (4) Whenever it is necessary to add any harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form directly into the water of any pool, use of the pool shall be stopped until such time as the chemical is dissolved completely in and is diffused thoroughly throughout the pool water. (5) All persons before handling pool chemicals shall read thoroughly the manufacturer's recommendations for proper use and adhere to those recommendations. (6) Disinfectants and oxidizing chemicals shall be stored in a physically separate manner from other chemicals such as acids or base compounds. 7 Sec. 4-10. Operation. (a) Each swimming pool owner shall require an operator to be available except when the pool is out of service. (b) Lifeguard(s) shall be required and present at all times during operation based on the following criteria: (1) pools of 2,000 square feet of surface area or more and open for use - minimum of one (1) lifeguard; (2) each additional 1,000 square feet - add 1 lifeguard. (3) pools of 2,000 square feet or more shall provide 1 lifeguard for every 75 swimmers and 1 lifeguard for each 25 swimmers thereafter. (4) pools with a surface area of less than 2,000 square feet, and/or having less than 75 swimmers present shall be required to provide a designated supervisor to oversee swimmer activity provided, however, that a sign is posted as follows: ~~Warninq; No Lifeguard on Duty. Children under the age of 14 should not be allowed to use the pool without an adult in attendance.~~ (5) pools of less than 1,000 square feet may be used without a designated lifeguard if all of the following criteria are met: a. children under 14 years of age are not allowed to use the pool unless accompanied by an adult; b. no one shall be allowed to be in the pool alone; c. a sign be posted exactly as stated in (b) (4) above. (c) Operators shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a pool operator as recommended by the National Swimming Pool Foundation or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. Lifeguards 8 shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a lifeguard as recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association, the American Red Cross or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. (d) A bound log shall be maintained by the swimming pool operator on the premises which shall contain the time and dates of the chemical test performed, results of those tests and initials of the persons who performed the necessary testing. The log shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months. 1. The log shall include the following at the specified intervals: a. all chemicals added, including quantity and time added - as needed; b. personnel and changes in personnel - as necessary; c. injuries - as necessary; d. maintenance operations including backwashing and vacuuming - as necessary; e. disinfectant levels - every three (3) hours; f. pH balance - every three (3) hours; g. stabilizer - weekly; h. alkalinity and calcium hardness - weekly. (e) Swimmer load shall not exceed a density of one (1) person per twenty-seven (27) square feet of pool surface area. (f) Animals, fowl and/or pets shall not be permitted within the pool area. This section shall not apply to working dogs, such as seeing eye dogs. 9 Sec. 4-11. Security. Swimming facilities shall be maintained in a manner which will not create a nuisance or hazard to the public safety and well-being when not in use, and the pool area shall be adequately secured against entry by the public in general. The impounded water shall, at all times, be treated in a manner which will prevent the growth of algae and the breeding of mosquitoes or other vermin. All entrances and exits to the pool area shall be secured against entry whenever a pool is not in operation. The fence or other security provisions shall be maintained and in good condition. Sec. 4-12. Safety and Rescue Equipment; Other Safety Features. (a) Every swimming pool shall be equipped with the following aids to safety and rescue which shall be readily accessible at all times: (1) One (1) or more light but strong poles with blunted ends not less than 12 feet in length. (2) One or more throwing buoys having a minimum strength test line attached of sufficient length to reach twice the width of the pool, placed on racks at strategic points adjacent to the pool. (3) A first aid kit which shall be kept filled and readily accessible for emergency use. (4) A readily accessible room or area designated and equipped for emergency care of casualties. Minimum equipment shall be the first aid kit previously required, a full-length backboard and 2 blankets. (5) A telephone with local emergency numbers for Police, Rescue Services and Fire Department. (6) On all swimming pools, the depth of the water shall be marked plainly at or above the water surface on the vertical wall of the swimming pool and on the 10 edge of the deck next to the swimming pool. Numbers and letters shall be 5 inches in size and of a good contrast with the pool wall and deck. Depth markers shall be placed at the following locations: a. at the points of maximum and minimum depths; b. at the point of change of slope between deep and shallow portions (transient point); c. at intermediate one foot increments of water depth; and d. if the pool if designed for diving, at appropriate points as to denote the water depths in the diving area. (7) Fixed and floating platforms in swimming pools shall be constructed with an air space of at least 1 foot between the water surface and the underside of the platform. (8) There shall be one (1) lifeguard chair provided for every two thousand (2,000) square feet of water surface area within the pool enclosure, except for pools exempt from lifeguard requirements as provided in §4-10(b)(5). (9) A life line shall be provided at the 5 foot break in grade between the shallow and deep portions of the swimming pool, or within 6 inches on either side of the break, with its position marked with visible floats at not greater than 7 foot intervals. The life line shall be securely fastened to wall anchors of corrosion resistant materials and of a type which shall be recessed or have no projection which shall constitute a hazard when the line is removed. The line shall be of sufficient size and strength to offer a good handhold and support loads normally imposed by swimmers. (10) Swimming pools equipped with heaters shall have a fixed thermometer in the circulation line at the heater inlet. Thermometers shall be of such design and so located as to be easy to read. (11) Where pools are to be used after dark, the swimming pool area shall be equipped with lighting fixtures 11 of such number and design as to light all parts of the pool, the water therein, and the entire surrounding area. Fixtures shall be maintained so as to create no hazard to the swimmers. The lighting shall be such that lifeguards can clearly see every part of the swimming pool including decks, spring boards and other appurtenances without being blinded by glare. a. Underwater lighting for such pools shall provide the equivalent of eleven (11) watts per square meter or one (1) watt per square foot of water surface for safety purposes and shall be equipped with ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) as required by the State Electrical Code. (12) Pumps, filters and other mechanical and electrical equipment for pools shall be enclosed in such a manner so as to be accessible only to authorized persons. Drainage shall be such as to avoid the entrance and accumulation of water in the vicinity of the electrical equipment. (b) The crossing of outdoor swimming facilities by overhead electrical conductors is prohibited, except as permitted by the State Electrical Code. (c) All metal fences or railings on which a broken electrical conductor-might fall shall be effectively grounded according to the State Electrical Code. (d) All lighting fixtures shall be prohibited directly above the water surface area except as permitted by the State Electrical Code, and shall be protected in a manner which will prevent broken glass from falling on any surface within the pool area. All electrical switches and receptacles shall be of weatherproof construction and resistant to corrosion. (e) Lights shall be prohibited directly above or within three feet horizontally of the pool rim in any indoor or covered swimming 12 pool, except as permitted in the State Electrical Code. (f) Access to the pool area shall be maintained and unobstructed to provide for emergency service vehicles and emergency attendants to the pool area. Sec. 4-13. Entry and Inspections; Enforcement; Penalties. (a) In accordance with the provisions of § 32.1-25 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Health Director shall have the right to enter any property to conduct inspections and to ensure compliance with this ordinance. All public swimming pools in the county may commence operations each year only after being inspected by the Health Director or his designee and receiving a permit from the Director and after complying with all licensing requirements of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Health Director is authorized to require each owner to complete and submit an annual application, all in such form as the Health Director shall approve. Each application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) to partially reimburse the county for the cost of this inspection. (b) When the Health Director finds that the provisions of this Article are not met or that any condition exists that endangers the life, health or safety of the users of any public swimming pool, he may order the facility closed until the condition is corrected. Continued failure to comply with these regulations shall be cause for revocation of any permit or business license issued, as required in subsection (a). Any person aggrieved by the refusal of the Health Director to grant, or by the revocation or 13 suspension of, a permit or license shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. (c) Any owner, agent or operator in charge of or control of any public swimming pool which is in violation of the provisions of Sections 4-4 through 4-12 shall be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. Any owner, agent or operator who shall operate a public swimming pool without a license or permit shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each day of operation of such pool without a valid license or permit shall constitute a separate offense. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its enactment. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: L.~c,e.~~...~-" Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Chief Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazzuri, Court Services 14 Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith „ Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Dr. Margaret Rutledge, Roanoke County Health Department 15 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ENACTMENT OF SEC. 4-4, DEFINITIONS, SEC. 4-5, RECIRCULATION SYSTEM, SEC. 4-6, WATER TREATMENT, SEC. 4-7 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS, SEC. 4-8 SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SEC. 4-9, GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS, SEC. 4-10, OPERATION, SEC. 4-11, SECURITY, SEC. 4-12, SAFETY AND RESCUE E UIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND SEC. 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS ENFORCEMENT PENALTIES TO ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS OF PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS AND A SCHEDULE OF FEES. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~ryVN~~ /J ~y ~/ BACKGROUND' In April 1981, the Board of Supervisors removed the entire Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code which dealt with swimming pools. This action was taken on the recommendation of the County Engineer, Mr. Robertson, upon the justification that the County's previous adoption of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code effectively superseded the County's Chapter 18 and, therefore, it was no longer enforceable. However, the original Swimming Pool Ordinance of Roanoke County as adopted in May of 1961, and as codified in the 1971 Code of the County of Roanoke, contained provisions regulating the operation of pools as well as construction standards. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Board of Health is currently in the process of promulgating and adopting regulations requiring the daily posting of water quality test results at public swimming pools under specific statutory authority. Once adopted, these regulations will only result in inspections and enforcement by local health departments when complaints are received. The Roanoke County Health Department has conducted inspections of swimming pools within the County for a number of years as well as of hot tubs and spas which are provided for under Article VI of Chapter 4 of the ! ~' County code. While working with the County's Finance Department to revise its fees schedules for these inspections, a question was raised as to the legal authority of the Health Department to conduct these swimming pool inspections. These annual inspections, prior to the opening of public swimming pools for the summer, constitute a valuable public service to the residents of the County to insure that public swimming pools are operated in a safe and healthy manner. The proposed additions to the County code provide specific authorization to the Roanoke County Health Department to continue the same scope of inspections which they have performed since 1981. At least nineteen localities in the Commonwealth currently regulate swimming pools under local ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT' It is estimated that inspection of swimming pools produces approximately $5,000.00 in annual revenue for the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Alternative I: Adopt proposed ordinance to provide explicit authority to the Roanoke County Health Department to continue the type of annual inspections of public swimming pools as has been provided for many years. Alternative II: Do not adopt any ordinance at this time and rely upon citizen complaints to trigger inspections by the County Health Department. Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance provisions. Respectfully submitted, (/~ Mol Rutledge, M.D. Health Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ENACTMENT OF SEC . 4-4, DEFINITIONS, SEC. 4-5, RECIRCULATION SYSTEM, SEC. 4-6, WATER TREATMENT, SEC. 4-7 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS, SEC. 4-8 SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SEC. 4-9, GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS, SEC. 4-10, OPERATION, SEC. 4-11, SECURITY, SEC. 4-12, SAFETY AND RESCUE EOUIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND SEC. 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES TO ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS OF PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS AND A SCHEDULE OF FEES. WHEREAS, Sec. 32.1-248.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the state Board of Health to promulgate regulations to require the daily posting of water quality test results at swimming pools and other water recreational facilities operated for public use, and said Board has submitted such regulations for public hearing and comment as a precondition for its adoption of those regulations; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2826, adopted effective April 14, 1981, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors deleted the entire Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools," of the Roanoke County Code upon the understanding that their previous adoption of the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code superseded the county code provisions dealing with construction of swimming pools; and WHEREAS, the mentioned Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools" also contained Article III. "Operations" provided standards for operation of swimming pools and criteria for their inspection; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public health and safety of the citizens of the County of Roanoke, Virginia to ~~ continue annual inspections of swimming pools by the Roanoke County Health Department; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994; a public hearing and second reading was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article I. In General of Chapter 5, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 4-4. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Agent: Shall mean a legally authorized representative of the owner; Disinfectant: Shall mean the agent that disinfects by inhibiting, neutralizing, or destroying the growth of harmful microorganisms; Free residual disinfectant: Shall mean the amount of measurable chlorine or bromine remaining in the water following disinfection; Health Director: Shall mean the Health Director of the Roanoke County - Vinton Health Department, or his authorized representative; Operator or Manager: Shall mean the individual or individuals responsible for operation and management of the swimming pool; 2 T-S Owner: Shall mean any person who owns, leases or has signed a contract to own or lease a public swimming pool; Swimming Pool: Shall mean any structure, basin chamber, or tank, located either indoors or outdoors, containing an artificial body of water intended to be used for swimming, diving or recreational bathing, and having a water depth of 24 inches or more at any point; Public swimming pool: Shall mean any swimming pool, other than a private residential swimming pool, intended to be used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and operated by any person, whether as owner, lessee, operator or concessionaire, regardless of whether a fee is charged for such use. The term "public swimming pool" includes, but is not limited to, tourist establishment pools, pools owned or operated by condominium, private club or association of persons, apartment, or any association of persons. The term "public swimming pool" shall not include single occupant tubs and showers used exclusively for therapeutic purposes. Sec. 4-5. Recirculation Systems. (a) All equipment shall be maintained in satisfactory operating condition during the operation of a swimming pool. (b) The filtration system of all swimming pools shall have sufficient clarifying capacity so as to permit the main drain to be clearly visible from the pool deck at distances up to 10 feet in a horizontal direction from the projection of the drain on the pool surface. 3 / -,.~ (c) All filters on swimming pools shall be designed and installed so as to provide easy accessibility for backwashing, operation, maintenance, and servicing. (d) All filters on swimming pools shall be designed and installed with the necessar~i valves and piping which may be needed to drain the filters and piping completely. (e) A permanent waterproof specification placard shall be conspicuously displayed on or adjacent to the filter and shall be adequately lighted. Specifications shall be printed or typed and readily legible. The following information shall be included on the placard: (1) name and location of facility; (2) date of construction; (3) capacity of gallons; (4) water surface area in square feet (square meters); (5) turnover rate in hours; (6) rate of flow in gallons per minute; (7) swimmer capacity; (8) pool operating procedures to include: a. instructions on proper operation of pumps and filter; b. instructions on proper cleaning procedures; c. instructions on proper backwashing procedures; d. instructions for emergency procedures to be followed in case of contact with hazardous chemicals. Sec. 4-6. Water Treatment. (a) Pools, when open or in use, shall be disinfected continuously by a chemical disinfectant which imparts a residual effect and shall be maintained in a non-acidic condition. (b) Pools, when open or in use, shall be disinfected using a 4 ~- chemical feeding device capable of maintaining an easily measured disinfectant residual. Manual feeding of disinfectant chemicals is prohibited except as provided in §4.9(a), (3) & (4). (c) Chemicals other than chlorine, bromine, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, muriatic acid, lime, soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, aluminum sulfate, calcium chloride, cyanuric acid and sodium bisulfate shall not be used to treat pool water without permission from the Commissioner. (d) Chemical water quality standards for swimming pools and wading pools: (1) Free chlorine, combined chlorine, bromine and pH values shall be continuously maintained within the following ranges: Minimum Ideal Maximum Free chlorine residual parts per million (ppm) 1.0 1.0-1.5 3.0 Combined chlorine (ppm) None None 0.2* Bromine (ppm) 2.0 2.0-4.0 4.0 pH 7.2 7.4-7.6 7.8 *Remedial action shall be taken by the operator if combined chlorine exceeds 0.2 ppm as it will result in reduced chlorine efficacy and increase swimmer irritation. a. If pool water disinfectants other than those above are used, residuals of equivalent disinfecting strength shall be maintained. b. If chlorinated cyanurates are used as pool water disinfectants, the cyanuric acid levels shall be maintained within the following ranges: cyanuric Acid (ppm) Minimum Ideal N~mm 30 40-50 60 5 T-,~ (e) Pool water shall be maintained in a slightly basic condition as indicated by a pH of not less than 7.0 and not greater than 8.0. (f) Pool water shall have a total alkalinity of not less than 50 ppm and not greater than 150 ppm or a water balance between total alkalinity and calcium hardness that is neither scaling or corrosive. (g) Other disinfectant agents or methods may be accepted after they have been demonstrated to provide the equivalent disinfection of chlorine and are readily measurable. (h) Test Kits: Acceptable test kits for the easy measurement of all required water chemistry parameters in these regulations shall be provided and maintained at each pool. The test kits shall be capable of measuring the disinfectant residuals accurately to within 0.5 ppm. (i) Microbiological Test: When the Roanoke County-Vinton Health Department determines that bacteriological samples are required, the quality of water in the pool shall be determined to be unacceptable by the presence of organisms of the coliform group, or a standard plate count of more than 200 bacterial per milliliter, or both, in two consecutive samples or in more than ten percent of the samples in a series. Sec. 4-7. Water Supply Systems. (a) Water supply systems serving swimming pool establishments shall comply with the Waterworks Regulations and/or Private Well Regulations. (b) The water supply distribution system shall be designed, constructed, and maintained in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (c) Where drinking fountains are provided, they shall be of an angle jet type with adequate water pressure at all times. Sec. 4-8. Sewage Disposal. (a) Swimming pools which have showers, water closets, and lavatories shall provide an adequate and safe sewerage system. 6 1 ~'~ (b) Sewage and waste water shall be disposed of into a public sewerage system or by a sewage system constructed and operated in accordance with applicable law and regulations. (c) No untreated or partially treated sewage, liquid waste, or septic tank effluent shall be discharged directly or indirectly onto the surface of the ground or into the public waters. Sec. 4-9. General Safety Provisions. (a) All chemicals, cleaning compounds and similar materials shall be stored in a cool, dry, and well ventilated place, out of reach from children and preferably in a locked room. All chemicals used in pool water treatment shall be stored in their original containers. (1) There shall be no smoking in any areas where pool chemicals are stored. (2) All persons while handling pool chemicals which may be strongly acidic or basic, or which may be strong oxidizing agents, shall wear protective eyewear and other protective clothing as deemed necessary by the Roanoke County-Vinton Health Department. (3) No harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form shall be added manually and directly to any pool water except under emergency conditions. (4) Whenever it is necessary to add any harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form directly into the water of any pool, use of the pool shall be stopped until such time as the chemical is dissolved completely in and is diffused thoroughly throughout the pool water. (5) All persons before handling pool chemicals shall read thoroughly the manufacturer's recommendations for proper use and adhere to those recommendations. (6) Disinfectants and oxidizing chemicals shall be stored in a physically separate manner from other chemicals such as acids or base compounds. 7 1 "~ Sec. 4-10. Operation. (a) Each swimming pool owner shall require an operator to be available except when the pool is out of service. (b) Lifeguard(s) shall be required and present at all times during operation based on the following criteria: (1) pools of 2,000 square feet for surface area or more and open for use - minimum of one (1) lifeguard; (2) each additional 1,000 square feet - add 1 lifeguard. (3) pools of 2,000 square feet or more shall provide 1 lifeguard for every 75 swimmers and 1 lifeguard for each 25 swimmers thereafter. (4) pools with a surface area of less than 2,000 square feet, and/or having less than 75 swimmers present shall be required to provide a designated supervisor to oversee swimmer activity provided, however, that a sign is posted as follows: ~~Warninq; No Lifeguard on Duty. Children under the age of 14 should not be allowed to use the pool without an adult in attendance.~~ (5) pools of less than 1,000 square feet may be used without a designated lifeguard if all of the following criteria are met: a. children under 14 years of age are not allowed to use the pool unless accompanied by an adult; b. no one shall be allowed to be in the pool alone; c. a sign be posted exactly as stated in (b) (4) above. (c) Operators shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a pool operator as recommended by the National Swimming Pool and Spa Institute or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. 8 /-~ Lifeguards shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a lifeguard as recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association, the American Red Cross or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. (d) A bound log shall be maintained by the swimming pool operator on the premises which shall contain the time and dates of the chemical test performed, results of those tests and initials of the persons who performed the necessary testing. The log shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months. 1. The log shall include the following at the specified intervals: a. all chemicals added, including quantity and time added - as needed; b. personnel and changes in personnel - as necessary; c. injuries - as necessary; d. maintenance operations including backwashing and vacuuming - as necessary; e. disinfectant levels - every three (3) hours; f. pH balance - every three (3) hours; g. stabilizer - weekly; h. alkalinity and calcium hardness - weekly. (e) Swimmer load shall not exceed a density of one (1) person per twenty-seven (27) square feet of pool surface area. (f) Animals, fowl and/or pets shall not be permitted within the pool area. This section shall not apply to working dogs, such as seeing eye dogs. 9 .~ sec. 4-11. security. Swimming facilities shall be maintained in a manner which will not create a nuisance or hazard to the public safety and well-being when not in use, and the pool area shall be adequately secured against entry by the public in general. The impounded water shall, at all times, be treated in a manner which will prevent the growth of algae and the breeding of mosquitoes or other vermin. All entrances and exits to the pool area shall be secured against entry whenever a pool is not in operation. The fence or other security provisions shall be maintained and in good condition. Sec. 4-12. Safety and Rescue Equipment; Other Safety Features. (a) Every swimming pool shall be equipped with the following aids to safety and rescue which shall be readily accessible at all times: (1) One (1) or more light but strong poles with blunted ends not less than 12 feet in length. (2) One or more throwing buoys having a minimum strength test line attached of sufficient length to reach twice the width of the pool, placed on racks at strategic points adjacent to the pool. (3) A first aid kit which shall be kept filled and readily accessible for emergency use. (4) A readily accessible room or area designated and equipped for emergency care of casualties. Minimum equipment shall be the first aid kit previously required, a full-length backboard and 2 blankets. (5) A telephone with local emergency numbers for Police, Rescue Services and Fire Department. (6) On all swimming pools, the depth of the water shall be marked plainly at or above the water surface on the vertical wall of the swimming pool and on the 10 ~=S' edge of the deck next to the swimming pool. Numbers and letters shall be 5 inches in size and of a good contrast with the pool wall and deck. Depth markers shall be placed at the following locations: a. at the points of maximum and minimum depths; b. at the point of change of slope between deep and shallow portions (transient point); c. at intermediate one foot increments of water depth; and d. if the pool if designed for diving, at appropriate points as to denote the water depths in the diving area. (7) Fixed and floating platforms in swimming pools shall be constructed with an air space of at least 1 foot between the water surface and the underside of the platform. (8) There shall be one (1) lifeguard chair provided for every two thousand (2,000) square feet of water surface area within the pool enclosure, except for pools exempt from lifeguard requirements as provided in §4-10(b)(5). (9) A life line shall be provided at the 5 foot break in grade between the shallow and deep portions of the swimming pool, or within 6 inches on either side of the break, with its position marked with visible floats at not greater than 7 foot intervals. The life line shall be securely fastened to wall anchors of corrosion resistant materials and of a type which shall be recessed or have no projection which shall constitute a hazard when the line is removed. The line shall be of sufficient size and strength to offer a good handhold and support loads normally imposed by swimmers. (10) Swimming pools equipped with heaters shall have a fixed thermometer in the circulation line at the heater inlet. Thermometers shall be of such design and so located as to be easy to read. (11) Where pools are to be used after dark, the swimming pool area shall be equipped with lighting fixtures 11 ,.~ of such number and design as to light all parts of the pool, the water therein, and the entire surrounding area. Fixtures shall be maintained so as to create no hazard to the swimmers. The lighting shall be such that lifeguards can clearly see every part of the swimming pool including decks, spring boards and other appurtenances without being blinded by glare. a. Underwater lighting for such pools shall provide the equivalent of eleven (11) watts per square meter or one (1) watt per square foot of water surface for safety purposes and shall be equipped with ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) as required by the Sate Electrical Code. (12) Pumps, filters and other mechanical and electrical equipment for pools shall be enclosed in such a manner so as to be accessible only to authorized persons. Drainage shall be such as to avoid the entrance and accumulation of water in the vicinity of the electrical equipment. (b) The crossing of outdoor swimming facilities by overhead electrical conductors is prohibited, except as permitted by the State Electrical Code. (c) All metal fences or railings on which a broken electrical conductor might fall shall be effectively grounded according to the State Electrical Code. (d) All lighting fixtures shall be prohibited directly above the water surface area except as permitted by the State Electrical Code, and shall be protected in a manner which will prevent broken glass from falling on any surface within the pool area. All electrical switches and receptacles shall be of weatherproof construction and resistant to corrosion. (e) Lights shall be prohibited directly above or within three feet horizontally of the pool rim in any indoor or covered swimming 12 / -- pool, except as permitted in the State Electrical Code. (f) Access to the pool area shall be maintained and unobstructed to provide for emergency service vehicles and emergency attendants to the pool area. Sec. 4-13. Entry and Inspections; Enforcement; Penalties. (a) In accordance with the provisions of § 32.1-25 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Health Director or his designee shall have the right to enter any property to conduct inspections and to ensure compliance with this ordinance. All public swimming pools in the county may commence operations each year only after being inspected by the Health Director or his designee and receiving a permit from the Director and after complying with all licensing requirements of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Health Director is authorized to require each owner to complete and submit an annual application, all in such form as the Director shall approve. Each application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) to partially reimburse the county for the cost of this inspection. (b) When the Health Director finds that the provisions of this Article are not met or that any condition exists that endangers the life, health or safety of the users of any public swimming pool, he may order the facility closed until the condition is corrected. Continued failure to comply with these regulations shall be cause for revocation of any permit or business license issued, as required in subsection (a). Any person aggrieved by the refusal of the Health Director to grant, or by the revocation or 13 ~~ J /~~ suspension of, a permit or license shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. (c) Any owner, agent or operator in charge of or control of any public swimming pool which is in violation of the provisions of Sections 4-4 through 4-12 shall be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. Any owner, agent or operator who shall operate a public swimming pool without a license or permit shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each day of operation of such pool without a valid license or permit shall constitute a separate offense. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its enactment. 14 T O o~ D Q C7 I n c Z ~ z ~o ~ D W~ O ~~ ^^ O ~ D ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ .~-, . Z m m _< ~~ ~ ~ ~ m _Z z D 2 m n O C D~ ~ ~ zo T ~~ 00 Z D ~ O r- o D Z N v n~ ~~ ~ N ~ o ~ b Z ±"'~ ~: ~ v, ~ ~ m z i -c3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~- o r ~. ~ ~~ D 1 ~~ o _ ~~ 's 3 co xx zz zz c: c. v D v ~ m ~? ~ ~ W li-` • •• ci OG U OG Ta-~e- ~ ~~~ -- 0 D W e o- _ ,, > > '~ c 1 ~ m ~G"k .m yDLTf~'~ - I •O W ~~ ~ .-.; rnx~O.tt^ TI ~ iv-C _n/~^~ , O m ~ y ~ :w ~n j :Y.Y .~ ~M.1./ tV ~ ~:~r~ ..~ (7 p :r .c, ~ryZ Z Nr ~ 3 •~r.m~! < ~ H .tom I+a+ ~ ~ ~ ~ O > ~ ~ ~ ~ 'mri a 1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o o i c 70 ~ ~ I ~ ~ m o~ ....~TGi..~R CC= . _, 4~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 RESOLUTION 62894-19 TO JOIN THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RISK POOL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING REINSURANCE AND THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") desires to protect against liability claims and property losses and to provide for payment of claims or losses for which the County may be liable; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool, aka VACoRP, has been established pursuant to Chapter 11.1( 15.1-503.4:I ct seq.) and Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, it is desirable for the County of Roanoke, Virginia to join the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool in order to purchase reinsurance and third party administrative services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to the member agreement entitled "Member Agreement for Virginia Association of Counties Group Self-Insurance Risk Pool" with modifications which creates a group fund to pay liability claims and property losses of the counties and other local agencies joining the Group, and we acknowledge we have received a copy of the pertinent Plan and supporting documents. The County of Roanoke joins the Pool for the sole purpose of purchasing reinsurance and third party administrative services. The County will be placed on a stand alone reinsurance contract apart from the VACoRP program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator is authorized to execute the member agreement to join the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool and to act on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in any other matter relative to the Group. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Robert C. Jernigan, Risk Manager Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney James Campbell, Executive Director, VACo ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER T ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to Join the Virginia Association of Counties Risk Pool for the Sole Purpose for Purchasing Reinsurance and Third Party Administrative Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ /J SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On June 14, 1994, the County decided to pursue self insurance as the most cost effective method for the County to obtain insurance coverage for auto and general liability. Normal procurement procedures were followed and low bid for insurance was received from the reinsurance company of DISCOVER Re with a bid of $132,430. This bid was issued through the Virginia Association of Counties Risk Pool (VACoRP). In reviewing the paperwork over the last week it has become apparent that the County would be required to join VACoRP in order to receive this low reinsurance bid. The County would only be participating in VACoRP for the sole purpose of purchasing reinsurance and using the third party administrative services. The County would not in any way participate with the risk sharing of the pool. The County will be placed on a stand alone reinsurance contract apart from VACoRP program. Staff has reviewed contracts and the necessary modifications to insure that the County is not in any way participating in the risk of the pool. The County is merely using VACoRP in the capacity of a broker to allow us to take advantage of this low reinsurance rate. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the purchase of reinsurance are included in the FY 1994-95 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution which will allow us to proceed with the purchase of reinsurance from DISCOVER Re. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approv by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Denied () Eddy Received () _ _ _ Johnson Referred O _ _ Kohinke To () _ _ Minnix _ _ Nickens Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 1994 WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") desires to protect against liability claims and property losses and to provide for payment of claims or losses for which the County may be liable; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool, aka VACoRP, has been established pursuant to Chapter 11.1( 15.1-503.4:I ct seq.) and Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, it is desirable for the County of Roanoke, Virginia to join the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool in order to purchase reinsurance and third party administrative services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to the member agreement entitled "Member Agreement for Virginia Association of Counties Group Self-Insurance Risk Pool" with modifications which creates a group fund to pay liability claims and property losses of the counties and other local agencies joining the Group, and we acknowledge we have received a copy of the pertinent Plan and supporting documents. The County of Roanoke joins the Pool for the sole purpose of purchasing reinsurance and third party administrative services. The County will be placed on a stand alone reinsurance contract apart from the VACoRP program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator is authorized to execute the member agreement to join the Virginia Association of Counties Group Self Insurance Risk Pool and to act on behalf of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in any other matter relative to the Group. O~ ROANp,,~~ ti ~ ~ z c> z J ,. I a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 Mr. Richard E. Evans P. O. Box 20061 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Evans: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 28, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. OOELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, June 28, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as an alternate member of the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals for another four-year term. Your new term will expire on July 25, 1998. State law requires that you take an oath Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. administered prior to your participation on telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requestE letter with you. of office before the This oath must be this Board. Please arrange to have the :d that you bring this State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sinc ely, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bj h Enclosures cc: Elaine Gall, Building Commissioner C~.~~xxt~~ ~~ ~u~xx~a~~.e ® Recyaea Paper O~ AOANp~.~ L ti ~ z c~ ~ i ~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 June 29, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRIGT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 5521 Lamplighter Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Reverend Crews: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 1994. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. Since ely, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Boar of Supervisors ~~ix~#~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 ® Recycled ram 0~ AOANp~~ ti z c~ v I az 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 29, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 BY FAX JUNE 29, 1994 Mr. James Campbell, Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20 Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Mr. Campbell: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 62894-19 to join the Virginia Association of Counties Risk Pool for the sole purpose of purchasing reinsurance and third party administrative services. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Robert C. Jernigan, Risk Manager C~~~xx~#~ of ~~~x~~~P ® R Paper 0~ ROANp~~ a ti A z c> ~ 2 o~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 30, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Linda Butterfield Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20 Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Ms. Butterfield: A memorandum was recently received from James Campbell, VACo's Executive Director, asking that a legislative contact be designated for Roanoke County and that you be notified of the selection. This will advise that at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting held on June 28, 1994, Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, was designated as legislative contact. Mr. Mahoney's mailing address is the same as the address listed above, and his telephone number is (703) 772-2007, and fax (703) 772-2089. Sincerely, YY~ ~~. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator C~.a~ixx~tg ~# ~.a~tx~~~t~ ®R«.ycaea Paper President Peggy R. Wiley Greensville Counr: President-Elect "William H.H. Blevins Smyth Counri -~rst Vice President Hamer R. Wanda Bath Counri Second Vice President Katherine K. Hanley Fairfax Counri Seaetarv-Treasurer E. Virgil~Sampson Ir. Scott County Immediate Past President Ham G. Darnel Chesterfield County Region 1 Gregory L. Duncan Acmmack County Region Z Marion B. Williams Prince George County Region 3 Rudolph V. Jones Charles City County John A. Waldrop Jr. Henrico County .~rt}ttu S. warren Chesterfield County Region 4 John J. Purcell Ir. Louisa County Region 5 Charles W. Cum' .~ugusta County Region 6 John M. Nolan Orange County Region 7 Ferris M. Belman Sr. Stafford County Hubert S. Gilkey ~ Rappahannock County Regon 8 William 1. Becker mince W illiam county Thomas M. Davis III Fairfax Counri Robett B. Dix Jr. Fairfax County ~lichael R. Frey Fairfax county Gerald W. Hvtattd Fairfax Cotmtv John D. Jenkins Prince William county Mary Margazet Whipple Arlatgton County Region 9 Wanda C. Wingo Botetourt county Region 10 J. Michael Davidson i Campbell County Mason A. Vaughan Sr. Pulaski County Region 11 M. Jay Hubble Smyth County Region 12 James H. Gibson Lee County Past Presidents Kathleen K. Seefeldt ,re William County W.D. Gray Ridmtond county Jadt D. Edwards James City County Executive Director James D. Campbell, CAE ® Genera! Counsel C. FBppo Hidct L ~- r VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ~ 1001 East Broad Street Suite LL 20 Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 (804) 788-6652 fax (804) 788-0083 'It7: Chairman, Board of Supervisors FROM: James D. Campbell, Executive Director ~^~J DATE: June 13, 1994 At it's last meeting, the VACo Board of Directors decided to establish a network of legislative contacts with every county. The purpose of the network is to make VACo's voice in the legislative process even louder, more emphatic and hopefully more effective. To make the system work right, the supervisor designated as the VACo legislative contact must be willing to serve the organization; must be available to react quickly; and, above all, must be responsive when called upon for action. It is assumed that each county's legislative contact has an excellent relationship with your county's delegation to the General Assembly (and perhaps Congress). The legislative contacts will certainly be expected to contact representatives in person, by telephone and possibly with a trip to Richmond. We will continue to use the county administrators as a conduit for legislative positions. In addition, legislative issues and requests for action are reported in our regular newsletters. Please let Linda Butterfield know who your county's legislative contact is by July 1~ren ~ ~ ~~ v~ ~. e ~ '~r~ 1' ~ y ha ~ ~ s ~~i~3 ~~- ~~ h ~ ~ ~ ~o>r,~y, ~'^~''~i I ~R°w- .e__ P.~ Q- ~~ to f~-, ~ Cc -~ Pic n I . _~ 4Qy o ~ ~s w. ewo ~- ~- ~ __ President ,' Peggy R. Wilev ' Greeneville County President-Elect William H.H. Blevins Smyth County r,f vice President ~T IRGINIA 1~SSOCIATION OF OUNTIES Harper R. Wagner Bath c°„nty 1001 East Broad Street Suite LL 20 Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 (804) 788-6652 fax (804) 788-008 Second Vice President Katherine K. Hanley Fairfax County ' secretary-Treasnrer ~. Chairman, Board of Supervisors E. Virgil Sampson Jr. Scott County 1nro,ediate Pasr Presiaent pgpM; James D. Campbell, Executive Director 4~1v~ Harry G. Daniel Chesterfield County Region 1 DATE: June 13, 1994 Gregory L. Duncan Accomack County Region 2 Marion B. Williams At it's last meeting, the VACo Board of Directors decided to establish a Prince George County network of legislative contacts with every county. The purpose o t e RuaolphVg] n s network is to make VACo's voice in the legislative process even louder, charlescityconnty more emphatic and hopefully more effective. John A. Waldrop Jr. Henrico Coun±y Arthur s. warren To make the system work right, the supervisor designated as t e chesterfield county VACo legislative contact must be willing to serve the organization; must be Regi°" 4 available to react quickly; and, above all, must be responsive when called John J. Purcell Jr. Lonisa connty upon for action. It is assumed that each county's legislative contact as an Regions excellent relationship with your county's delegation to the General charlesw.cnr y Assembly (and perhaps Congress). The legislative contacts will certainly Augusta Count Region 6 be expected to contact representatives in person, by telephone and possibly John M. Nolan with a trip to Richmond. orange county Region 7 Ferris M.Belmansr. We will continue to use the county administrators as a conduit or Stafford County ;Iuberts.Gilke~nl legislative positions. In addition, legislative issues and requests for action Rappahannock county are reported in our regular newsletters. Region 8 wiuiam J. Becker Please let Linda Butterfield know who your county's legislative Prince William County Thomas M. Davis Ill contact is by July Fairfax County Robert B. Dix Jr. Fairfax County Michael R. Frey ~ ~ ~ j Pairfax Countyq/ ~'' Gerald W. Hyland ~ Fairfax County John D. J enkins jjj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / M .~" ~ Prince William County ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, J ~ ~ _S Mary Margaret Whipple ` ~/ Arlington County Region 9 ~ ~ t' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wanda C Wingo f/ '~ ~ir ~ ~~ Botetourt County Region 10 J. Michael Davidson ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ r ,. ~j Campbell County 66tt i ~ 1/'] ~ J ~~ 1 VVV III"~~~ f Mason A. Vaughan Sr. Pulaski County Region 11 M. Jay Hubble Smyth County a Region 12 ~ _..,s+~- James H. Gibson Lee County Past Presidents ,~., Kathleen K Seefeldt ice William County W.D. Gray /'~ Richmond County ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,/~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Jack D. Edwards CJ*'", [~ James City County Executive Director James D. Campbell, CAE ~~ ~ ~ ~;~ ® General Counsel .,a C Flippo Hicks ~F ROANp~,~ ~~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ J ? a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~~x~#~ _ ) D"~ ~ Q~YxCitC~P P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 30, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell Clifton A. Woodrum A. Victor Thomas H. Morgan Griffith J. Brandon Bell Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo Dear Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 62894-2 expressing support for Roanoke County~s participation in the Roanoke Valley Regionaliaation Group. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC bjh Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Randolph M. Smith, Salem City Manager B. Clayton Goodman, Vinton Town Manager Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ® Recyaed Pew O~ ROANp~~ z ~ ~ z v a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 June 13, 1994 (~.o~~#g ~f ~ ~~tx~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Members of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group: Our next meeting has been scheduled for Monday, July 11, 1994, at 10 a.m. at the Vinton War Memorial. You will recall that considerable time was spent during our last meeting discussing the proposed Towers-Perrin study of the local governmental services that could be regionalized. Tom Robertson and Joe Vipperman assured the group that the business community would share with the localities, on a 50-50 basis, the $45,000 cost of the study. Delegate Cranwell said that he would talk with Salem City Council about sharing the cost. As suggested by Bob Herbert, the managers and administrators will meet on June 29 to review the scope of work included in the Towers-Perrin proposal and will report to the full group on July 11. Delegate Griffith expressed an interest in having Elliston, Ironto, and Shawsville included in the study and asked the managers to determine how much additional that would cost. During the May 27 meeting, Senator Bell suggested that each locality bring to the next meeting a vote from their governing body supporting participation in the study. This should be a good meeting. allow you to attend. meh I hope that your schedules will Very~~ruly yours, :, ~~ ~~' ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc - The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell ® Recyded Paper ~-i PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 28, 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE FY 1993-1994 BUDGET OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE TO APPROPRIATE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. -'~(1. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 21, 1994 e D Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 ~'~~ ~M Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 28, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Maureen E. Poplstein to rezone 2.34 acres from R-3 to C-1 to operate a training and development office, located at 5670 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 9, 1994 J`am` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 14, 1994 Tuesday, June 21, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Maureen Poplstein c/o Training Unlimited PO Box 20475 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-7751 To be paid on delivery by: SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, June 28, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Shelton Parker Spencer, II and Linda Taylor Spencer requesting vacation of a portion of an existing 20-foot sanitary sewer easement and accepting a relocated portion of same easement located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, located in Lakeland Farms. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the County Attorney's Office ,located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 9th day of June, 1994. mom, ~ . Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: Tuesday, June 14, 1994 Tuesday, June 21, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 .. ~.., .. r,_ ~, _ ~:----- .: ~~_~ . PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 28, 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to-wit: AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ENACTMENT OF SEC. 4-4, DEFINITIONS, SEC. 4-5, RECIRCULATION SYSTEM, SEC. 4-6, WATER TREATMENT, SEC. 4-7 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS, SEC. 4-8 SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SEC. 4-9, GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS, SEC. 4-10, OPERATION, SEC. 4-11, SECURITY, SEC. 4-12, SAFETY AND RESCUE EOUIPMENT• OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND SEC. 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS ENFORCEMENT PENALTIES TO ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL OF CHAPTER 4, AMUSEMENTS TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS OF PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS AND A SCHEDULE OF FEES. All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish on the following dates: Sunday, June 19, 1994 Sunday, June 26, 1994 Please send the invoice to: ~^~g~~~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 28, 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168 "SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 14.5$ FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995, AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 25$ FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996, AN INCREASE IN THE CONNECTION FEE FOR TO $1500.00, AND TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN TRANSITION PROVISIONS TO IMPLEMENT SAME All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection. in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. _ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 7, 1994 June 14, 1994 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN 1~ °-a ~ ~ Q ~'- jy aM 8 ~~ ~ '~° S/5U ~~ i ~ ~a ~ o~~ PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board o Supervisors of Roanoke ~~ County, Virginia, at its meeting on June ~ 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING § 21-3, UTILITY SERVICE TAX, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE CONSUMER UTILITY TAX ON CELLULAR TELEPHONES All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. nnn t Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: June 7, 1994 June 14, 1994 Send invoice to: e 5-a3_~ ^ Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN Memorandum To: Bob Johnson Ed Kohinke Elmer Hodge Bayes Wilson Deanna Gordon Fred Anderson Paul Grice From: Diane Hyatt /~ ta.~ Date: June 16, 1994 Subject: Audit Committee Meeting This is a reminder that our first Audit Committee Meeting for the 1993-94 audit will be held on Tuesday, June 28, 1994 at 2:00 P.M. in the County Board conference room. The purpose of the initial meeting will be to allow our independent auditors (KPMG Peat Marwick) to briefly outline their plans for the upcoming audit and specify any changes that they anticipate. Also at this time, the Audit Committee members may specify any specific areas of concern that they would like the auditors to address during their audit. rYa ~~ o.-, G /aft Qt, ~ v0.. ~~ .~~ ~ ~._a---~..~ / /~ h ~ ~~v ~: --z,i -~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~, ____ C~ L_ ~ ~/ 6 --~~ U , ,r, C~ v ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~?/ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~v~--rim G ~~ - v~ Q.p-~~e~ l/ ~ NOTES FOR 6/28 BOARD REPORT ON BONDING POLICY FROM ECH - Reconsideration of this issue was made by EGK - Board previously expressed concern about extensive use of sick leave. - Cannot change adoption leave with changing maternity and paternity leave (CHECK PMM) - Leave Policy Team studied this issue extensively and supported the reduction of this type of leave from 30 to 20 days with an increase in family leave from 3 to 10 days. - Leave is still very liberal - Family Leave act only requires unpaid leave. - ECH Recommendation: I support the Leave Policy Team's recommendation of reducing this leave from 30 to 20 days as approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 24. If additional time is needed, the employee may use annual leave or unpaid leave. O~ FtOANp~~ 1. ~ p 2 ~ ~ 2 v a 7838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~o~~xx~#~ ~f ~o~~o~.e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 21, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 5521 Lamplighter Drive, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Sam: This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of today. Thank you very much for agreeing to present the invocation at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Board Meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 1994. As we discussed and as you know from your recent tour of the facilities, the Roanoke County Administration Center has moved from Brambleton Avenue to 5204 Bernard Drive, the old "Travelers Building", located directly behind Shoney's off Rt. 419. The Board Meeting room is on the first floor and visitors' parking is in front of the building. I appreciate very much your willingness to be with us next Tuesday. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 772-2005. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ®Recyaed Paper ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 28, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Support for Participation and Funding of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACRGROIIND Last year, Delegate C. Richard Cranwell suggested that the Roanoke Valley governments establish a regionalization group to study issues such as water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and housing. The goal was to look at the potential for more efficiencies, and the possibility of securing state funds that we are currently not receiving. SIIMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Committee asked Bill Evans, Vice President of Towers-Perrin to interview all five localities, review their contracts, and documents, and conduct a preliminary review of these and other potential areas for regionalization at an estimated cost of $15,000. Mr. Evans has conducted similar studies in Charlotte, North Carolina, Louisville, Kentucky, and Jacksonville, Florida. Towers-Perrin reported that such a study would actually cost $45,000. Some governments expressed reluctance to pay the increased cost, even though all had agreed to split the original estimate. At the May 27 meeting, Tom Robertson, Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Business Council, and Joe Vipperman, President of Appalachian Power, agreed to have the business community share the costs on a 50/50 matching basis. The local governments would pay $22,500 of the $45,000 estimated cost for the study. In preparation for the next meeting on July 11, Delegate Cranwell asked that each locality be prepared to decide if they ar =milling to pay their share of the new estimate which would a $4,500..,,-' State Senator Brandon Bell also suggested that each governs y adopt a resolution of support for the regionalization group. ' --`~ -~ L,/~,~,~4 kf- r ~" ____~-___,1~ .__ FISCAL IMPACT: If the Board of Supervisors approves participation in the study, the cost will be $4,500. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: (1) That the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution indicating their support for participation in the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group. (2) That the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriation of the County's share of funding for the Tower-Perrin study, estimated at $4,500, with funds appropriated from the Board Contingency Fund. S ~ l S~ b..~ ~ s~~' ~~ ~ ~.. ~..,, Wit,. ' /~"`'-. ~._ f1 ''~a"~-"~ rte---~ Elmer C. Hodge n ~„~ County Administrator ------------------- --- -- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JIINE 28, 1994 RESOLIITION ERPRESSING SIIPPORT FOR ROANORE COIINTY~S PARTICIPATION IN THE ROANORE VALLEY REGIONALIZATION GROIIP WHEREAS, in September 1993, elected officials and business leaders met to discuss the regionalization of such services as water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley legislators agreed at that time to introduce legislation that could rebate state income tax on new businesses to local governments for a period of years regardless of the location of the new business, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group determined that a study should be conducted to review the various services provided by each local government and develop a list of those services that should be considered for regionalization, and WHEREAS, the group has requested that the Counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton share on a 50/50 matching basis with the Roanoke Valley business community the cost to implement the study, and WHEREAS, it was also requested that each locality indicate by resolution their support for participation in this study. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group to review and recommend services that should be provided on a regional basis, and THER, the Bo r f Supervisors of Ro oke County will ~,,~ ~ appr riate 500 for is sha Ito provi a an indepe ent study by -~.:„ y Towers-~errin. Y" ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 28, 1994 Welcome to the Roanoke County Boa ~ S ring. Regular meetings are held on the second Tae: ~ iesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:a Ld i ~' ~ iesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule THERE WILL BEAN AUDTl COMMI DO P.M. PRIOR TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS lh~~~~.~. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored 6y Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-200. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Irnocation: The Reverend Samuel Crews Coopers Cave Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS . ~ ;= ~ ,~ ~~,- ~~ - 1. -~..` ~,,~-; "~ ~ j Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of Dr. Bayes Wilson, Roanoke County School Superintendent. D. NEW BUSINESS a SQ ~ ~ h1 r}~ 1. cry ~ ~c yc ~ ti ~/ ~5~~ ~ 2. yr; ~ _ 3. ~~, i 4. ~~~ /~ Request for Approval of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 14, 1994) (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorne ) ., ~ ~ ~ Request for Authorization~or the Roanoke County School Board of Submit Certain Literary Fund Applications. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) ~ j.'~• iM Request to Apply forTInclusion in the Virginia Public School Authority's Fall 1994 Bond Sale. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director r ~ Request for~Support for Participation and Funding for the .~ l Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) ~~w~"' ----- 5. Request for Appropriation of Funds for Jail Operations. . ~ (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) ~ ~~ 6. Request for Appropriation of Compensation Board c~ Reimbursement for Commonwealth's Attorney and the Treasurer. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) EC-1~ -~-a 7. Request for Approval of Payment to F & W Community ~-~ ~ ~-® Development Corporation for Water System Expenses ~ ~' k ~ ~ Between September 1986 and January 1991. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) `~ 8. Reconsideration of the Adoption Leave Policy. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) ~~ ~ ~' r i -,r-~j~ ~j~ Mrs J`_,l , 'Y`om / ~/'~° ~ E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARIlVGS G, REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse St_ able Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 5424 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on ---~ ~ ~ Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the ~----° ~'" ~ Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial istD rict, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 3 I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Extending the Franchise of Boothe American Company D/B/A Salem Cable TV to Operate a Cable Television System in Roanoke County for a Period of 120 Days. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) '~°- 2. Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary r 't' Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) --~ ,, I 3. Ordinance Declaring a Parcel of Real Estate Identified as ~' V v Tax Map No. 86.01-2-15 Located off Homewood Circle in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District to be Surplus and Accepting/Rejecting an Offer for the Sale of Same. (John Willey, Property Manager) J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 2. Virginia Western Community College Board K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY TIC BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building 4 Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. r` ~ of L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' CONIlViENTS AND CONIlViiJNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. 2. 3. 4. %~~O ~~~ 6. g. Solid Waste ' O.` WORK SESSION ,~~~ -~ r0 ~~~ 5 S c~, o01 ~~° -~ S 'Z,. Amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To Discuss a legal matter, Enforcement of the Bingo Code Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION :,-~ ~~~ s General Fund Unappropriated Balance Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Fund Fire and Rescue Reaction Response Times -May 1994 Report on 1991 Water Project Bond Project Status Report EVENING SESSION R PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCES L.J' ne~f p rcZ AND FIRST READING OF Ordinance to Amend the 1993-1994 Budget of the County of Roanoke to Appropriate an Amount Not to Exceed $1,500,000 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance and Other Sources for the Purpose of Environmental Remediation at Dixie Caverns Landfill. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 21-3, Utility Service Tax, of the Roanoke County Code by Providing for the Imposition of the Consumer Utility Tax on Cellular Telephones. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) n C. ~ 2. Ordinance Amending~~ and Reenacting Section 18-168 rle ~, Schedule of Charges of the Roanoke County Code to O ~„~ Provide for an Increase in Base Charges of 14.5% for Fiscal Year 1994-1995, an Increase in Base Charges of 25% for Fiscal Year 1995-1996, an Increase in the Connection Fee to $1500.00, and to Provide for Certain Transition Provisions to Implement Same. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.34 Acres from R-3 to C-1 to Operate a Training and Development Office, Located at 5670 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Maureen E. Poplstein. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) ~ ~ 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of an ~x~ \` 6 Existing 20-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement, Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 5. Ordinance Amending the Roanoke County Code by the Enactment of Sec. 4-4, Definitions. Sec. 4-5, Recirculation S sy temp Sec. 4-6, Water Treatment, Sec. 4-7 Water Sunnly Systems Sec. 4-8 Sewage Disposal Sec. 4-9, General Safety Provisions, Sec. 4-10, O eration~ Sec. 4-11, Securi and Sec. 4-12, Safety and Rescue Equipment; Other Safety Features, and Sec. 4-13, Entry and Inspections. Enforcement, Penalties to Article I. In General of Chapter 4, Amusements to Provide Aut~~jj - for Health Department Inspections of Public Swi'nm~i~ig Pools and a Schedule of Fees. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) T. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COI~IlVIUNICATIONS U. ADJOLIRNNIENT CURVE RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH "A' 275.00' 24.06' 48.00' 3 ~3°3 8. 89. 6' ~O+F ~~. 15' TELE. ELEC. EASMNT. 30' MINIMUM BUILDING LINE. } LOT 2 ~ v ~ N \ ~ .. o p N N DELTA CHORD CH. BEARING 10° 00' 03' 47.94' S 78° 36' 10' E CYNT p49.401E T~~ t 50~ H'A ~R. LAKELAND DR. CURVE ~A~R~W~ --'-- ~ S 83°36' 10'E ~,~ 21. 0' _,`~ _~ ~~ - ~._. _ V' ~ \ ~~ - ~~ o~ ~ ~•'` . S. 3. ~. TO a oc ` ................F V ~ ~ \ `~ATEp I \ e 2.3, ry ~~•3q, ~~ . ~ OF $. S, w, ~ p ~ \ .. ~ ~. EXISTING 2 ••~ f~ TO BE Dfp -.~ ZO' SANITARY ~ ~•• I CAT~O i SEWER ~• ESM'T. ~\~ D.B.1060, \•• ,• PG. 824 LOT I 0.313 ACRE -_-vzr • O O ~~~ -v 2 ~ ~'~o .~ _ ~ `J' r - r cP (A ` N ~ n d~ ~ W cP O~ ~ • ~ ~ ti rn o \~ C ~ryES ~` ~ 10 DRAINAGE EASEMENT I BLOCK 2 BRANCH ,--~. , N ~3°3g EZE PERTy ORM R~ X34.34, D, E,RA F OF Y 8 ~ ~ GER TZ s>5 NOTE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD INSURANCE ZONE "X" AS DESIGNATED BY THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN LEGAL REFERENCE: DEVELOPMENT. P.B. 9 PG. 123 TAX N0. 76.03-4-22 ~~;;:> M M O N N N !!f 00 ~ Of N M E N O O M B " N l0 l0 aONM n o0 a0 ~ N of M O o M nN ~ n N o M~'a0N ~~i:::<:~:~:~:~:L`~ n nnoo~ O~nN~ nM~ m~~ ~ O~' N ~ n .- O M ~ N N ~ M~ N N N O a- O ~ O N n M 00 <D n ................. . 1~ aG?iii[''iii :~:~:~:~~:":~:~:~:~:~:`~:~ "":~::'"~':::~::::~i n n oo (C er ao of N N O N Q) oo d' M n n Q7 n lA ' Q1 0o N ~ M t0 f0 (~ N N In d' ~ 00 0 ~ (G d (O d' tD N M .- ~ ~ ~ N N .- M In ~ M ~' ~ .- M N O r' I r ~ : .- ~r ..: : :»`p. ~.'''"'''''" ~ M N ~ M M n '" ~ M n ct n ~n Q1 O .....:............ ................... .................. ................... >~~~~~~~:~:~:~:%::~:~:~:~: to In (O ~ O t0 d' 07 ~ N t0 '- tf N d' M !O N r ~- ~ O f0 ~D O O CO ~ n r 'd o d' O ~::;:;:;: ;:;<;:;`: r 111 ~ ~~ N N M N ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ M O ~LL~i;;:>~:~:~~:~iG:' N N ~ N M ~ d' M .- N 00 M N n t0 :::::::::~:~i ::::Z.:::::::::; ~ d' M A O ~ ~~~ ~ n ~n N N .- M n t0 N .- O n N oo O O M a O O ~n o O :5:.:..w~;:~:a;::: ~ M ~ O M N M O r ~ N In ~ M O > L., M G ~ ~ Q .::.: i~:.. ' n t!1 to n N .- ~ N r f0 00 ~ 00 ~ (O n N H M O ~n n n 0 0~~ O O n o O ~~' ~ r M In r lf1 In O d: O N LLY O~ ~ N M O IU w ~o•-o Sri on .=co moo n~~ w ct :: i~::iir S::S;:•>:i' "":~i:~: :::::::::::::: n In O t1' N lA M (O ~ l tf1 O M M N n to N 1n 01 00 O~ ~ N <G r O ~ ~ r tf1 O N N ~ A N N O O 00 ~ O t0 l0 ~ M O '::::>; :~ ~~~~ ~ ~ N !1 W ~ : :: :0::~~::~:~:~:~; r d' d' r fV r r M Q1 r l11 N r ~ O r r .................. ................... .................. ^ ` ~ ~ " 00 tf1 cD n M O ~n ~- n t0 n tf1 O et ~O N N o0 to o0 t0 N N 01 N ~ d' M O O O o~0o M ~ ~ ` ` ~ ` ;iii: ~ M d' ~ tD 00 ~ O M~ M M ~~ M M O M M ~ N ~: : N d' M O ~ O N 01 M OD ct 00 00 00 00 O W ~' M~ d' M n (0 t[1 00 n N W f0 N n M ~ N ~n N N o0 N N o0 0 0 ~~ 00 M M O 0 ~>: O~ N N N~ ~ d' ^ M M~ O nj M O 0 ~ ~:: :~~ d' ~t ~ ~ N O O ui 1~ 00 00 M r N ~ z : :> : :> : : z : : : : : u~ :::: ::::::::: :.. r~::<~!<:<:;:: ~> . +~[ e} n N~ ~ 00 r t!1 .- ~ Q1 N n N n 01 ~ M O n 00 r 00 tD ~ N N~ O O Q1 0' .0,.,.,.: ;i;i;i;i;i" .-- ~ ~ .- M N at M O ~ d' O M N ~ N M ~ ~' ~ M ~ n ~ ~ O ; ~ r r O N (0 N fC lA r 00 lA n <G fD ~LCi~i~i~i~:~ ~' 'Q+1ii~'i~i:'i`1i ............ ...... I lL:<i;i:3i9i ~ ~~ ~ -. W ;;:; r l0 N 00 n 01 N N N M~ t0 M ~ ~ ~ M n 00 00 t0 E N O O O fG a (C M N ..;. . ::: ~::::: ~{-" ::::~4 ~ ~~ et~NO Nan MM ~nM OM SON B O ~ ~~ ^ N . / M~ d' N e- M 00 tt O In O O O i'~r1' .`:G~ ~i33i :::::>:: a:>::>::::> n in u1 n N ~ n ao M M A N N d' 01 d' N o0 M .- d' CO M oo O O ~n o M N n o 00 n at ~ cD ~ d' N M N ~ ~ N N N LO M O l!1 N ~ M d' O d' O ~ e- O ~ `- ~ ~ `~ N N N O ~ lL1 r ~U N n M 00 f0 n n f:~:~:~:~:`~:~:G ~ w w,,yy ~~w .................. Q':':':;:>:~:~>:~:~:~> W~ O N N N ~~ N O O O O O O 00 N 00 ~ ~ ~ OO r 01 O O O o f0 N N o ~iii.i"`` r ~- N Cf N M N M ~ 'd' M~ ~ O M ~ n >: '' M M M O M In M ~?' l!1 ~ In ~ r r Q1 ~ r f' '' 'i: Q U.>.:; ~~tt11 '~~~ 00 th tt 00 N ~ ~ 00 n M A N ~ 00 n to oo M M N '~ M Ln r O O~ o ~ ~ 00 0 :4~F;1»~' ~:::~:~: f0 tf1 d' n N ~ N .- .- N ~~ N A M ~ '- N M N O M r l[1 ~ O tF n .- .~ , .; ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ .- ~ ~ lf1 .- to t0 !~ ~ ~ 'rc' aa: : .. ... o. :: . ~... ~ii<~:'?:`.:':.';; ` ~ n M 00 r 00 00 ~ r O O O M N ~ ~t 00 M et ~ ~ 01 ~ M O O M~ ~ ~ OD r~:::::>t;»:> : ~ .- et ~ N uY r O .- .- O N M O w ~_ i- z Cw G Q W Q J ~' a C N 7 ~ C ~ o y U t N V N A N N j .- Alcohol Safety Action Program ::ommunity Diversion incentive Program ;Dort Driver improvement Programs Pre-1Yia1 Services Program Offices: Salem Bank 8c Trust 220 East Main Street Suite 218 Salem. VA 24153 Roanoke City 0~fficx Crystal Tower Building 145 Campbell Avenue Suite 401 Roanoke, VA 24011 ~~y ~~ office Allegheny Co. Courthouse Covington, VA 24426 '703)965-0340 Rockbridge o~x 2044 Sycamore Avenue Buena Vista, VA 24416 '703) 261-6281 ~~~ n~°T' ~'.~ COURT -COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAM serving the ltuenty-third and Tiuenty: f fth Judicial Circuit and District Courts M E M O R A N D U M TO: Dr. Harry Nickens FROM: Jim Phipps VIA: Ron Albright DATE: June 3, 1994 SUBJ: Resolution in Honor of the Honorable Edward S. Kidd, Jr. I am following-up on our most recent (past) discussion regarding the retirement (July 15, 1994) of Judge Kidd and the possibility of having a resolution prepared by Roanoke County. A copy of Judge Kidd's resume is attached. As you know, Ed has been Chief Judge of the 23rd Judicial District since 1980, serving Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem and Vinton. His final date of employment will be July 15, 1994. Also, we have enc mmons" inviting you to the "trial" so that you ( a representative) can present the resolution personally. e only to pay for any guest. Thank you for your JTP/ja V 77 G' sistance. l // 1 /~ ~ C%Lv~ /- -~-~~ - ~ (~ i u-~• - -- l/~_i~ EDWARD S. K1DD, JR. CHIEF JUDGE OF GENERAL DISTRICT COURT 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 315 W. Church Avenue. 2nd Floor Roanoke, Virginia 24016-5007 Phone: (703} 981-2511 PERSONAt_ INFORMATION Born in Alexandria. Virginia Marred. three children, one grandchild EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Ferrtrm Junior College George Washington University Juris Doctor from George Washington University Law School Additional courses at: National Judiclal Collage Washington & Lee University American Academy of Judicial Education EMPLOYMENT DATA Private practice of law in Roanoke City 1969 to 19 7 8 Appointed to General District Court Bench 1978 Elected Chief Judge of 23rd Judiclal District in 19$0 Appointed State Representative 1986 and 1987 to American Bar Association Conference of Special Court Judges Appointed to Judicial Conduct Committee 1985 to 1987 Appointed to Supreme Court Subcommittee on Substitute Judges BAR AND JUDICIAL AFFILIATIONS American Judges Association Member, Board of Governors Member. Concerns and Standards Committee Member, Image of the Judiciary Committee Member, Court Administration and Organization Committee Association of Virginia Trial Lawyers Former member, Exeoutrve Board Roanoke Bar Association Virginia State Bar Member, Mediation Committee American Bar Association American Judicature Society Association of District Court Judges of Virginia Secretary-Treasurer Board of Directors SPECIAL INTERESTS Collecting pictures of Virginia courthouses q ~ 3 ~° U W A ~ ti~ ~o W ~ ati b 0 0 C7 ca q fV ~ F= O~ w~i W y OM Iy~W ~ A o~ z 0 V1 a: ~~ ~• z °a O F U? Q O F 0 U 0 a O~ ~; ~: O`• O c~ ~. A vi W °z x ~~ ~~ O ~~ ~+ z ~` G~46 w W x OONO 0 (~a~,i~ W O w° U O NI ~W C~ . C O O .~ cd 7 CC .~ h C~ U b w W 0 w a 0 b b 0 U i7'+ a:. O ~ . . F„ ~: °; ~. a ~~ A ~: ~. z 5~ 1~ 1~ A w O O o ~I C ~ ~ '~ ~ b W O U ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ G~ •O ~ ~, ~ o ~~ ~a~ ~,•y O Q a 'g a ~ ~ o .rte •~ '$ o ~ ~ a ~ ~' a~ '~ o ,a ~ U ~., .~ ~~ o al O b a~ C~0. w a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ w~ a~ •.~ ~F 3 H U g y ~ N °z~ X30 Li, a0i O ~ N C7 ~ ~a ~ ~,O ~.~ V ~, 6io O U Q U p U v ~ U ~ o U o pw., o o ~ o ~ ~ ~ M ~ F z a a~i .~ 0 U 0 a~ H o~: ~; d ~ N O. d ~• -~; ~ ~ c~ h V O v~ O.~ w ~; o y ti ~ a~+ .".~ •~ O C." a C~ ..~i '~ ~~ O Cd '~ ~5 ~ U ~ ed o~ ~~ y ~3 ~~ ~~ 0 ;~ o ~ _~ V~ .~ b ~'> a~ ~ ~ ~. "~ •~+ Cd .~ a cd~ y .~ O c~d .~ a w 0 a~i 0 o~ v~ o_ ti >, .c a 0 a a~ N Q O 0 a_ •~ a ~ ~~ ~ ON b ~~~ ~~„o~ ~° ~' a`~ ~o .. ti .~ C .~ O `,tl O b b M .~ 0 v g h