Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7/26/1994 - Regular
~ ao~N ~~ C~~~xx~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JULY 26, 1994 MAfI s M S(t f~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ROLL CALL AT 3:06 P.M. HCN ARRIVED 3.16 P.M. FM ABSENT 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. i B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PMM - DELETE EXE SESSION ITEM ~) TO CONSIDER THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR WATER TRANSMISSION LINE PROTECT C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Glenvar High School for Winning the Fifth Annual Central Fidelity Cup Athletic Competition. RESO PRESENTED TO ROGER MARTIN ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL AND ATIH.ETIC DIR: AND COACHES LARRY WOOD, BASEBALL; ART LAWRENCE. TENNIS; AND BO HAGEN, GOLF R-72694-1 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH FM ABSENT 2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of July 30 - 31, 1994 as "The Battle of South Salem". RESO PRESENTED TO TIM TATE FOR UNION AND VIC MIDDLEKOFF FOR CONFEDERACY R-72694-2 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH FM ABSENT 3. Recognition of Melinda Rector for Receiving Certification as Professional Secretary. s MRW RECOGNIZED D. BRIEFING 1. Briefing and Video on Storm Restoration Efforts by Appalachian Power Company. (Tobie Eaton, Roanoke Division Manager, APCO) MR. EATON BRIEFED BOARD AND GAVE COPY OF VIDEO ("WHAT GOES ON WHEN THE POWER GOES OFF") TO BOARD E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of Projects to the Drainage Maintenance Priority List. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-72694-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE REQUEST URC WITH FM ABSENT F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIItST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING OF ITEMS 1 AND 3 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - 8/23/94 3 URC WITH FM ABSENT 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-2 to C-2 to Operate a Garden Center Located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of John A. Hall. 2. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Fast Food Restaurant at the Intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Westmoreland Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Tacoma, Inc. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING OF ITEM 2 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - 8/23/94 URC WITH FM ABSENT AND BL.T ABSTAIN 3. An Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Allow Replacement Only of Individually Sited Single Wide Manufactured (Mobile) Homes Throughout Roanoke County with a Newer Single Wide Mobile Home. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Certain Sections of Chapter 20, Solid Waste, Pertaining to Expanded Definitions, Specific and Supplemental Collection Categories and Services, Bulk and Brush Collection, and Effective Date. (Gardner Smith, Director of General Services) 0-72694-4 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 4 URC WITH FM ABSENT K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board LBE DIRECTED CLERK TO CONTACT CCRB FOR SUGGESTED NOMINATION 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission LBE NOMINATED CHIEF BOBBY FRONK, FROM CAVE SPRING RESCUE SQUAD, TO SERVE FOUR YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1998 3. Social Services Advisory Board HCN NOMINATED FM TO SERVE FOUR YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE AUGUST 1, 1998 L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII~L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-72694-5 BL.T MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT RESO URC WITH FM ABSENT 1. Approval of June 14, 1994, and June 28, 1994 Minutes 2. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. A-72694-5.a A-72694-5.b A-72694-5.c 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 4. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. 5. Confirmation of Appointment of a Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. A-72694-S.d M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Congratulated Chairman on radio auuearance concerning regional cooperation, and felt there was a good exchange of information. Supervisor Nickens: ~) Advised that he did not have an unlisted telephone number as some citizens have indicated because C&P Telephone left his home address and home number out of the 94/95 directory. C&P Information will give out both telephone numbers. (2) Advised that he agreed with the points in LBE's memo of 7/13/94 on utility deposits. (3) Advised that he will be out of the area from August 5 through August 16, 1994. Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Advised that he attended First Union's lst Anniversary of Card Products Customer Servicing Unit and they have exceeded the projected employees by 100. ~2) Toured the addition to Hollins Branch Library and it is proceeding on schedule. Supervisor Eddy: ~,1) Advised that he attended First Union's celebration and press conference and that they have exceeded the projected employees and plan to add more employees. (2) Asked about status of drop off box for citizens. ECH advised that it will be several weeks before it is in service and there will be a dress conference to announce it. (3) Asked for status of Sewage Treatment Contract. ECH advised that it will be brought to the Board in August. ~) Advised that meeting with Roanoke City Council will be held 9/12/94 at noon with place to be announced later. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. MR. EVERETT "NEIL" HARTWELL, 1420 RED LANE EXTENSION -ADVISED THAT THE OUALITY OF WATER AT HIS HOME IS UNACCEPTABLE AND ASKED FOR DETERNIINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY OF SALEM ECH AND STAFF WILL CONTACT MR. HARTWELL AND RED LANE EXTENSION CIVIC LEAGUE TO INVESTIGATE COMPLAINT O. REPORTS EGK MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FOLLOWING REPORTS UW WITH FM ABSENT 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -June 1994 5. Bond Project Status Report LBE DECLARED RECESS AT 4:05 FOR WORK SESSIONS P. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session with Fire and Rescue Ad Hoc Committee. (4:00 p.m.) BEGAN 4:15 P.M. ,TMC, CHIEF FUQUA, AND 7 MEMBERS OF 11 MEMBER COMMITTEE PRESENT JMC S ZED THE CONIlVIITTEE'S FINDINGS ON THE DAVID M. GRIFFITH VEHICLE STUDY CONCERNING (1) STANDARDIZATION= (2) USE OF COMaVHTTEES; AND (3) SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL ISSUE CONCERNING VEHICLE FOR MASON'S COVE RESCUE SQUAD CONSENSUS OF BOARD THAT ISSUES ARE COMPLEX AND CONIlVIITTEE SHOULD CONTINUE THEIR PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF + + NG ADDITIONAL ITEMS HCN (1) SUGGESTED THAT NO ISOLATION OF VOLUNTEER AND RESCUE PERSONNEL IN MAKE-UP OF CONIlVIITTEES; (2) SUGGESTED STANDARDS BE SET FOR RUNNING GEAR ON ALL APPARATUS; (3) ASKED THAT CONIlVII'I'rEE LOOK AT STAFF USE OF SEDANS VS. FOUR-WHEEL DRIVES; AND (4) HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ROTATION OF EQUIPMENT B ~T HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ROTATION OF EQUIPMENT AND ASKED FOR MORE INFORMATION LBE (1) ASKED FOR INFORMATION FROM OTHER LOCALITIES CONCERNING EXPERIENCES WITH ROTATION OF EQUIPMENT; (2) ASKED THAT CONIlVIITTEE'S FINAL RECOMII~NDATION INCLUDE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS FOR ALL ISSUES, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT, STAFFING, FUNDING, AND PERFORMANCE ON RESPONSES ECH ADVISED THAT ANOTHER WORK SESSION WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE 9/13/94 MEETING 2. Work Session with the School Board on School Capital Improvement Program (CIP). (4:30 p.m.) BEGAN 5:05 P.M. SCHOOL BOARD CALLED TO ORDER AT 5:05 P.M. BY CHAIRMAN THOMAS -ALL PRESENT. SCHOOL BOARD TO BRING BACK AT 8/23/94 MEETING AT LEAST THREE OPTIONS FOR BOND REFERENDUM WITH PROTECTS PRIORITIZED FINANCING ALTERNATIVES, AND IMPACT TO QUALITY OF EDUCATION: (1) $15 MILLION BOND REFERENDUM; ~2) $30 MILLION BOND REFERENDUM ;AND (3) NO BOND ISSUE - MAINTENANCE PROTECTS ONLY. Q. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS LBE DECLARED RECESS AT 6:25 P.M. R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Disposition of Real Property, Namely, to Consider an Offer to Exchange Surplus Well Lot for Two Year Easement; (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Pinkard Court Project; {fie (5) To Discuss Location of a Prospective Business or Industry; and (7) For Consultation with Legal Counsel to Discuss Potential Litigation concerning Lingerfelt Development. B ~T MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:25 P.M. URC WITH FM ABSENT S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-72694-6 B T MOTION TO ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO AT 7:06 P.M. URC WITH FM ABSENT EVENING SESSION 9 T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse Stable Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-72694-7 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-72694-8 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-72694-9 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT AND LBE ABSTAIN 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, io Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-72694-10 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT 5. Ordinance Vacating a Surplus Right-of--Way Located on Autumn Park Drive as Recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Vaughn Incorporated. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-72694-11 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT 6. Ordinance Vacating a 0.004 Acre and a 0.002 Acre Portion of a Dedicated Right-of--Way as Recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ron Jackson. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-72694-12 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FM ABSENT U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND C0114MUNICATIONS NONE V. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Pinkard Court Project; and (7) For Consultation with Legal Counsel to Discuss Potential Litigation concerning 11 Lingerfelt Development Corp. BLOT MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 7:30 P.M. URC WITH FM ABSENT W. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-72694-13 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO AT 8:05 P.M. URC WITH FM ABSENT X. WORK SESSION 1. Consideration for County Maintenance of Stormwater Detention .Ponds. (8:00 p.m.) ECH ARNOLD COVEY AND PMM BRIEFED THE BOARD ON HISTORY PRESENT STATUS FINANCING AND LIABILITY RICK ~ FROM HOMEBUILDERS BRIEFED THE BOARD ON PROPOSED APPROACH FOR COUNTY MAINTENANCE RICHARD CONWAY~ RESIDENT OF KINGS CHASE II, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTY 117AINTENANCE STAFF DIRECTED TO COriTINUE TO MONITOR SITUATION AND KEEP INFORMED OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE REGULATIONS FOR FUTURE IMPACTS Y. ADJOURNMENT BOARD DECIDED NOT TO HAVE EXTRA MEETING ON 8/9/94 SINCE SCHOOL BOARD'S NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR 81194 B T MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 9:00 P.M. - UW is ~ ROAN ~, F a ~ p z 2 a C~.o~ixxt#~ .v~~ ~.~~txt~~te ROANOKE COUNrI'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JULY 26, 1994 ~~~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke Couniy, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ® awe Pam„ C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Glenvar High School for Winning the Fifth Annual Central Fidelity Cup Athletic Competition. 2. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of July 30 - 31, 1994 as "The Battle of South Salem". 3. Recognition of Melinda Rector for Receiving Certification as Professional Secretary. D. BRIEFING 1. Briefing and Video on Storm Restoration Efforts by Appalachian Power Company. (Tobie Eaton, Roanoke Division Manager, APCO) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of Projects to the Drainage Maintenance Priority List. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-2 to C-2 to 2 Operate a Garden Center Located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of John A. Hall. 2. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Fast Food Restaurant at the Intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Westmoreland Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Tacoma, Inc. 3. An Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Allow Replacement Only of Individually Sited Single Wide Manufactured (Mobile) Homes Throughout Roanoke County with a Newer Single Wide Mobile Home. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Certain Sections of Chapter 20, Solid Waste, Pertaining to Expanded Definitions, Specific and Supplemental Collection Categories and Services, Bulk and Brush Collection, and Effective Date. (Gardner Smith, Director of General Services) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3. Social Services Advisory Board 3 L'. M. N. O. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII,L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of June 14, 1994, and June 28, 1994 Minutes 2. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 4. 5. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. Confirmation of Appointment of a Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -June 1994 5. Bond Project Status Report P. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session with Fire and Rescue Ad Hoc Committee. (4:00 p.m.) 2. Work Session with the School Board on School Capital Improvement Program (CIP). (4:30 p.m.) Q. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Disposition of Real Property, Namely, to Consider an Offer to Exchange Surplus Well Lot for Two Year Easement; (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Pinkard Court Project; (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Water Transmission Line Project; (5) To Discuss Location of a Prospective Business or Industry. S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 5 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse Stable Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance Vacating a Surplus Right-of--Way Located on Autumn Park Drive as Recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Vaughn Incorporated. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 6. Ordinance Vacating a 0.004 Acre and a 0.002 Acre Portion of a Dedicated Right-of--Way as Recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ron Jackson. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and 6 Inspections) U. V. CITIZEN CO1VIlI~NTS AND COA~IlVIUNICATIONS WORK SESSION 1. Consideration for Detention Ponds. W. ADJOLTRNIV.~NT County Maintenance of Stormwater (8:00 p.m.) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 72694-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL FOR WINNING THE FIFTH ANNUAL CENTRAL FIDELITY CUP ATHLETIC COMPETITION WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the educational programs in Roanoke County Schools, helping to produce well-rounded students and teaching skills useful throughout a lifetime; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was recently recognized by the Virginia High School League as the Group A School with the best overall performance in state-level athletic programs; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was awarded the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup in recognition of the outstanding athletic ability of the students of the school; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School is the first school in the Roanoke Valley to receive the Central Fidelity Cup; and WHEREAS, this award represents a significant achievement, as it symbolizes a commitment to excellence in a variety of sports, and memorializes the nine Pioneer District Championships; the Region C Championships in Baseball, Tennis, Golf and Softball; and the State Championships in Baseball, Tennis and Golf, won by the Highlanders during the 1993-94 School year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the STUDENTS AND STAFF OF GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL for their outstanding performance in athletic competition and for receiving the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol`~on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation _. ~ f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL FOR WINNING THE FIFTH ANNUAL CENTRAL FIDELITY CUP ATHLETIC COMPETITION WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the educational programs in Roanoke County Schools, helping to produce well-rounded students and teaching skills useful throughout a lifetime; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was recently recognized by the Virginia High School League as the Group A School with the best overall performance in state-level athletic programs; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was awarded the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup in recognition of the outstanding athletic ability of the students of the school; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School is the first school in the Roanoke Valley to receive the Central Fidelity Cup; and WHEREAS, this award represents a significant achievement, as it symbolizes a commitment to excellence in a variety of sports, and memorializes the nine Pioneer District Championships; the Region C Championships in Baseball, Tennis, Golf and Softball; and the State Championships in Baseball, Tennis and Golf, won by the Highlanders during the 1993-94 School year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the STUDENTS AND STAFF OF GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL for their outstanding performance in athletic competition and for receiving the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup. c_a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 72694-2 DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF JULY 30 - 31, 1994, AS "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM" WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, Confederate forces, under the leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 419 in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engagement; and WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS on the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, there will be a re-enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000 spectators and 500 re-enactors, and contributes to the tourism efforts of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby declare the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, as "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM", and extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful re- enactment of the event. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE• Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE WEEKEND OF JULY 30 - 31, 1994, AS ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM~~ WHEREAS, on June 21, 1864, Confederate forces, under the leadership of Major General Jubal Early, and Union forces, under the leadership of Major General David Hunter, engaged in a battle at Hanging Rock, near the present intersection of Routes 311 and 419 in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, prior to that battle, there was a skirmish near the confluence of Peter's Creek and the Roanoke River, also in Roanoke County, known as Hunter's Raid or the South Salem Engagement; and WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS on the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, there will be a re-enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000 spectators and 500 re-enactors, and contributes to the tourism efforts of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby declare the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, as ~~THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM~~, and extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful re- enactment of the event. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER •- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing and Video on Storm Restoration Efforts by Appalachian Power Company COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Tobie Eaton, Roanoke Division Manager for Appalachian Power Company, has requested time on the agenda to brief the Board on APCO's efforts at storm restoration. He plans to show a nine-minute video entitled "What Goes On When the Power Goes Off." ~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens A-72694-3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Addition of Projects to the Drainage Maintenance Priority List COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~,,~,,,,,'..+~w~i p`"~~~a~ ~u-. Projects P-74 through P-158 were presented to and approved by the Board of Supervisors. A status of these projects are shown in EXHIBIT "A", PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS. Staff is now submitting projects P-159 through P-186 for approval and inclusion to the Drainage Maintenance Priority List for FY 94-95. These projects are estimated to cost $149,00.00, as shown in EXHIBIT "B", PROPOSED PROJECTS. Funding is available for projects remaining on the priority list from the previous fiscal year. During the Board work session on February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors approved a procedure for establishing a priority of proposed projects. The procedure for evaluating projects is based on a rating or point value for a specific situation. For example, more points are given for the potential damage to a house or structure than what would be considered only a minor nuisance. In addition to assigning a point value to a specific situation, the frequency of a problem is considered. The proposed projects submitted are prioritized according to the approved procedure during the work session. ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION EXHIBIT "A" PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS EXHIBIT "B" PROPOSED~PROJECTS ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS No additional funding is being requested. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of these additional drainage projects for inclusion to the Drainage Maintenance Priority List. S MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Co y, Dire for Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & I spections County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION VOTE Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs ent to approve staff Eddy x recommendation Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections 2 ~/ "EXHIBIT "A" PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS PROJECTS %COMPLETED P-74 thru P-158 86~ ~. P-74 Josephine Hall Complete 3931 Hawley Drive Cost: $3 0,000 P-75 Janet Stump Complete 3026 Fresh Meadow Lane Cost: $ 5,000 North Meadows P-76 Sandra Griffith Complete 4643 Huntridge Road Cost: $ 3,500 P-77 Marie LaFranco Complete 7090 Highfields Farm Trail Cost: $ 3,000 Highfield Estates P-78 John W. Hanna Complete 3035 Tree Top Lane, S.W. Cost: $ 7,500 Penn Forest P-79 Charles Mason, III Complete 5520 Eveningwood Lane Cost: $ 1,300 North Lakes P-80 Donald L. Dye Complete 3019 Purple Finch Road Cost: $ 4,000 Penn Forest P-81 David H. Noble Complete 5227 Chukar Dr., S.W. Cost: $ 1,975 Hunting Hills P-82 William Graybill Complete 4444 Cresthill Drive Cost: $ 5,400 P-83 Alfred Lee Abbott Complete 4354 Sheldon Drive Cost: $ 700 Cresthill P-84 Mary Peterson Complete 5402 Lakeland Drive Cost: $ 1,500 P-85 Rosalee Wood Complete 3509 Hyde Park Drive Cost: $ 700 Windsor West P-86 Pete C. Karageorge Complete 8236 Birkdale Road Cost: $ 1,500 P-87. Pinkard Court Partial Completion Remaining portion dependent on the start of road project. Estimated Cost: $ 5,000 P-88. Arthur Meador Complete 3502 Brandywine Avenue Cost: $ 4,000 Mt. Vernon Heights 3 P-89. Samuel Mazingo Complete 528 Stacie Drive Cost: $ 800 P-90 Ruth Lipnik Complete 3660 Bunker Hill Drive Cost: $ 3,000 Mount Vernon Heights P-91 Maurice Rowe Complete 4404 Cresthill Drive Cost: $ 4,500 Cresthill P-92 Bob Shively Temporarily delayed 5321 Grandin Road Ext. Cost: $ 3,200 C. J. Carmack Map P-93 Greg Barton Complete 2774 Ivy Lane Cost: $ 500 P-94 Bill Gradwell Complete 3570 Parkwood Drive Cost: $ 2,200 Green Valley P-95 Sandra Murray Complete 6348 Back Creek Road Cost: $ 2,600 P-96 James R. Craig Complete 2808 Ellison Drive Cost: $ 2,000 Robin Hood Park P-97 Ruth Ann Davis Complete 6102 Cove Road Cost: $ 1,200 P-98 Ken Smith Complete 5426 Doe Run Road Cost: $ 3,000 Hunting Hills P-99 Frances S. Tyree Complete 4785 Sunny Side Drive Cost: $ 1,000 Bellemeade P-100 Edward Whisnant Complete 5117 Norseman Drive Cost: $ 800 Viking Court P-101 Dennis Putnam Complete 8402 Brubaker Drive Cost: $ 5,500 William Creek P-102 Randy Gerber Complete 3038 Pebble Drive Cost: $ 1,100 Hamden Hills 4 ~~ , ~ P-103 Betty Overstreet 5315 Cave Spring Lane Nottingham Hills P-104 Alton Prillaman 6139 Darby Road P-105 John Newman 8242 Loman Drive P-106 Summit Ridge Road La Bellevue P-107 Leroy Moran 5000 Carriage Drive P-108 Elbert Lester 2695 Eastland Drive P-109 Jerry Arnold 4233 Arlington Hills Arlington Hills P-110 P. W. Carroll 5529 Merriman Road P-111 Betty Prater Berry 3402 Overhill Trail Penn Forest P-112 Harry Williams 1001 Martin McNeil Rd. P-113 Deborah Lynn Marshall 7192 Bent Mountain Rd. P-114 Robert Tunnell 5522 Galloway Circle Castle Rock Farms P-115 W. H. Farthing 1848 Dorset Drive, S.W. P-116 VDOT Manassas Avenue Mt. Vernon Heights Complete Cost: $25,000 Complete Cost: $ 500 Indefinitely delayed Loman Drive being a private road, property owners not in agreement of project. Cost: $25,000 Complete Cost: $ 2,500 Complete Cost: $ 1,000 Complete Cost: $ 1,500 Complete Cost: $ 2,800 Complete Cost: $ 5,000 Complete Cost: $15,000 Complete Cost: $ 1,500 Complete Cost: $ 1,000 Complete Cost: $ 3,300 Complete Cost: $ 1,500 Complete Estimated Cost: $15,000 Bond 5 -, / P-117 Willa Sink 6416 Suncrest Drive Suncrest Heights Temporarily delayed Developer to correct portion of problem. Estimated Cost: $ 6,200 P-118 John E. Page 3043 Forest Acre Trail P-119 Ms. Jean Patterson 147 Missimer Court Crofton P-120 Betty Aliff 3606 Colony Lane P-121 Dan Gibson 5327 Endicott Street P-122 Tim Harris 3424 Ashmeade Drive Georgetown Park P-123 Andrew Woodson 2837 Crown Cricle P-124 W. R. Ferguson 2783 Diplomat Drive Montclair Estates P-125 Donna Hawkins 7456 Bradshaw Road P-126 Barry Jamison 2765 Fernlawn Road P-127 James McCulloch 5824 Oakland Blvd. P-128 Natalie Wheeler 6261 Buckland Mill Rd Buckland Forest P-129 Craig Hoge 5432 Scout Circle Cherokee Hills Complete Cost: $ 1,500 Complete Cost: $ 1,200 Complete Cost: $ 2,000 Complete Cost: $ 7,000 Complete Cost: $ 1,000 Indefinitely delayed Downstream property owners not in agreement or donation of permanent easement. Estimated Cost: $ 1,500 Engineering & Surveying underway Estimated Cost: $ 1,000 Complete Cost: $ 1,000 Temporarily delayed Currently discussing options with citizens Cost: $ 3,500 Complete Cost: $ 1,200 Complete Cost: $ 2,500 Complete Cost: $ 1,500 6 ~°-1 P-130 Jim Vitale Complete 2127 Montgomery Circle Cost: $ 1,600 Montgomery Village P-131 Sylvia Arthur Complete 8109 Hunters Trail Cost: $ 500 Bellview Gardens P-132 Ronnie Wade Complete 3505 Brandywine Avenue Estimated Cost: $ 5,000 Mt. Vernon Heights P-133 Gilbert B. Banton Complete 2331 Coachman Drive Cost: $ 800 La Bellevue P-134 George Jacob Complete 6024 Williamson Road Cost: $ 1,400 P-135 Daniel Wray Complete 4426 Keefer Road Estimated Cost: $10,000 P-136 Nelson Craighead Complete 4913 Colonial Avenue Estimated Cost: $ 5,500 P-137 Judy Shandor Complete 5781 Scenic Hills Drive Estimated Cost: $ 1,000 Kristle Kreek P-138 Gary Crews Construction underway 3661 Bunker Hill Drive Project revised to include Mt. Vernon Heights VDOT - $ 9,000 Private - $ 3,200 County - $10,000 (additi onal) Estimated Cost: $ 1,500 P-139 Gordon Willoughby Temporarily delayed 3718 Martinell Avenue Estimated Cost: $12,000 P-140 Charles Callahan Complete 6324 Fairway Forest Drive Estimated Cost: $ 1,300 Fairway Forest P-141 Mark DiCarlo Temporarily delayed 2613 Gaylor Road Estimated Cost: $ 1,500 Sugarload Heights P-142 Carroll Smith Green Valley Bond Project 3787 Fairburn Drive Estimated Cost $ 800 P-143 Sherry Burton 5406 Apple Blossom Lane Estimated Cost: $ 5,000 Hidden Valley Court 7 ~- , P-144 Troy Leon Smith Complete 913 Grove Lane Estimated Cost: $ 2,000 Captain Grove Estates P-145 S. Weade Complete 4015 Drake Circle Estimated Cost: $ 1,500 Buckland Forest P-146 Charles Droste Complete 3727 Hyde Park Estimated Cost: $12,000 Windsor West P-147 Geoff Straughn Complete 1946 Bridle Lane Estimated Cost: $ 900 Hidden Valley Court P-148 Judy Chapman Complete 238 Spring Grove Drive Estimated Cost: $ 500 Spring Grove P-149 Ruth Naomi Sheplak Under construction 5811 Old Manor Drive Estimated Cost: $ 2,000 Old Manor P-150 Sandy Hoke Green Valley Bond Project 3924 Colony Court Estimated Cost: $ 3,000 Green Valley P-151 Robert G. Williams Complete 7040 Highfields Farm Drive Estimated Cost: $ 400 Highfields P-152 Danny thomas Complete 5615 Penguin Drive Estimated Cost: $15,000 Penn Forest P-153 Jim Oyler Engineering & surveying underway 7834 Barrens Road Estimated Cost: $ 2,000 P-154 Les Hagie Complete 5235 Canter Drive Estimated Cost: $ 300 Canterbury Park P-155 Matt Robertson Complete 2788 Ivy Lane Estimated Cost: $ 1,000 Spring Grove P-156 Scott W. Bauman 5585 South Roselawn Estimated Cost: $ 200 P-157 Betty Sodino 4704 Whipplewood Drive Estimated Cost: $ 100 Branderwood 8 -/ P-158 Jack Waldron 956 Paint Bank Road Estimated Cost: $ 500 EXHIBIT "B" PROPOSED PROJECTS ~"/ PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER STATUS P-159 Mary Bland (RFA 92E1009) Complete 7920 Cedar Edge Forest Edge DESCRIPTION: Channel Improvements ESTIMATED COST: $3,500 TAX MAP #95.01-3-50 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS P-160 John Hamilton (RFA 93E1116) Complete 4209 Arlington Hill Dr. Arlington Hills DESCRIPTION: Replace with Concrete pipe ESTIMATED COST: $6,000 TAX MAP #86.16-4-27 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING P-161 Randy Likens (RFA 92E1071) Complete 906 Starmount Avenue Deer Run Estates, Section #2 DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP #27.09-2-1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-162 Mrs. Legg (RFA 92E1071) Temporarily 5647 Penguin Drive Delayed Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: ($4,000) TAX MAP #87.13-7-2 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING ]0 '~ PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER P-163 Nancy Biggs (RFA 92E936) 549 Water Oak Road DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: ($1,000) TAX MAP # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-164 P-165 P-166 1820 Dorset STATUS IIVDEFIl~TITELY DELAYED Danny Gilbert (RFA 93E1158) CONST. BEGIN JULY DESCRIPTION: INSTALL CONCRETE PIPE WITH HOMEOWNER PARTICIPATION ESTIMATED COST: $ 7,000 - Homeowner $10,000 - County $ 3,000 - VDOT TAX MAP #76.10-533.1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS Wayne Lineberry 3730 Ellen Drive DESCRIPTION: INSTALL STORM SEWER WITH VDOT PARTICIPATION ESTIMATED COST: $30,000 TAX MAP #55.10-4-3 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA Mr. Taylor 2950 Penn Forest Blvd. Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: REPLACE COLLAPSED STORM SEWER ESTIMATED COST: $30,000 TAX MAP ##87.06-3-21 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING Engineering & Surveying Underway Engineering & Surveying Underway ~-. PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER STATUS P-167 Mr. Peyton Complete 4818 Colonial Avenue DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP #87.05-4-9 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING P-168 Mr. Harry Goin (RFA 92E1053) Complete 8167 Hunters Trail Belleview Gardens DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $1,000 TAX MAP #28.01-1-10 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-169 Linda K. Winge Complete 4914 North Spring Dr. DESCRIPTION: INSTALL ADDITIONAL STORM SEWER ESTIMATED COST: $5,000 TAX MAP #37.13-3-32 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA P-169A Public Safety BLDG. (RFA 94E1172) Engineering 3568 Peters Creek Road & Surveying Underway DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT ESTIMATED COST: $8,000 TAX MAP #37.10-1-21.2 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA 12 ~-/ PROJECT NUMBER P-170 NAME Martin Carle 5515 Tanney Drive REQUEST NUMBER STATUS Engineering & Surveying Underway DESCRIPTION: HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS ESTIMATED COST: $4,000 TAX MAP #37.05-1-15 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA P-171 Reggie Lemons 7131 Cedar Crest Road Woodlands DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $5,000 TAX MAP # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-172 Phillip Day (RFA 93E1147) 7574 Old Mill Road DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP ## 9 5. 0 3- 2 -1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS P-173 Clifford Fountain (RFA 92E964) 7045 Starlight Lane TAX MAP #97.03-1-12 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $6,000 CAVE SPRING 13 ~~ PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER P-174 Joseph Stowers (RFA 92E1052) 3326 Kenwick Trail Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $1,000 TAX MAP #87.06-3-35 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING P-175 Alice Holpp (RFA 92E864) 1309 Ashebrook Drive Hampden Hills DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $18,000 TAX MAP ## 7 9 . O 1- 2 -1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON P-176 Robert M. Crigger (RFA 93E1089) 2933 Beldon Drive STATUS DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 TAX MAP #25.01-1-26 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA P-177 Pacetti R. Carlos 5339 Endicot DESCRIPTION: INSTALL ADDITIONAL PIPE ESTIMATED COST: $8,000 TAX MAP ## 3 8.12 - 3 - 41 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS 14 ~~! PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER STATUS P-178 Chris Lawrence 5342 Huntridge Road DESCRIPTION: CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP $# MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-179 Virginia Hodgson 3717 Kentland Drive DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $2,000 TAX MAP # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS P-180 Cathy Yotka (RFA 93E1159 3930 Westmoreland Dr. Mt. Vernon Heights DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 TAX MAP ## 7 7.13 - 4 - 3 5 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING P-181 Sam St.Clair 2850 Silver Leaf North Beverly Heights DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 TAX MAP #44.03-3-55 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA 15 ~~ PROJECT NUMBER NAME REQUEST NUMBER STATUS P-182 Paul Black ~ (RFA 94E1199 7549 Williamson Rd. DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 TAX MAP #27.11-3-9 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: HOLLINS P-183 Danny Rivers 2417 Horsepen Mountain Circle Falling Creek Estate DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $1000 TAX MAP #50.04-3-87 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON P-184 Lawrence Kelly (RFA 92E974) 3587 Farmington Drive DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $7,000 TAX MAP #76.20-3-10 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS P-185 Dorothy Overstreet (RFA 93E1097) 2725 Tanglewood Drive Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP #87.14-4-15 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING ]6 -/ PROJECT NUMBER NAME P-186 Lucille Iantosca 1313 Deer Run Drive REQUEST NUMBER (RFA 93E1152) STATUS DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL ESTIMATED COST: $3,000 TAX MAP #61.04-2-52 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON 17 -/ NORTH ~~ _~5~ ROANOKE COUNTY MARY BLAND ENGINEERING & 7920 CEDAR EDGE ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 95.01-3-50 P-159 SE~OSP ~O ` ~ lr.H~ G 2~ CQjC' O~h~JY 9 RO R ~ ~ ~ ~~ F ? ri F yc . << i~h BRID EVE o~ :oo o ~ ~~y1' ~ o~ eR ~ ,"'N ~~EQ,~ A HORS . Gy" ~ 'f' C~ /C~ F G y y~ ,~~~ E 5 OP~'p~f~ ~\ `r.~ ~J 4~, JAY B R• vC Hj ~ I11A .n 'ALCOLM ~, ,~VICINI T Y MAP~N-~+o~-~p-~ ° --• ~-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY JOHN HAMILTON ENGINEERING & 4209 ARLINGTON HILLS DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 86.16-4-27 P-160 E-/ NORTH P->6) ROANOKE COUNTY RANDY LIKENS ENGINEERING & 906 STARMOUNT AVENUE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 27.09-2-1 E-/ NORTH E,qC~ Cg SITE .. 44 ~$ ~~ 4w SNpIq B ~ CR ROANOKE COUNTY MRS LEGG ENGINEERING & 5647 PENGUIN DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 87.13-7-2 P->62 ~- / NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY NANCY BIGGS ENGINEERING & 549 WATER OAK ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 38.08-4-68 P-163 E-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY DANNY GILBERT ENGINEERING & 1820 DORSET DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 76.10-5-33.1 P- > 64 E_/ NORTH S~ ~. ~E~n ROANOKE COUNTY WAYNE LINEBERRY ENGINEERING & 3730 ELLEN DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 55.10-4-3 P- > 65 ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT E-i NORTH MR. TAYLOR 2950 PENN FOREST BOULEVARD 87.06-3-21 P-166 E-/ NORTH s Q 9~ ~tiQ 0 ~D~ v0~ PENN FOREST BL P`~ .~.'.'.~.'.'. a ~' ~ f ROANOKE COUNTY MR. PEYTON ENGINEERING & 4818 COLONIAL AVENUE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 87.05-4-9 P->67 -/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY HARRY GOIN ENGINEERING & 8167 HUNTERS TRAIL INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 28.01-1-10 P- > 68 E-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER 3568 PETERS CREEK ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 37.10-1-21. > P->69A .~~~. a°' `ESTATES ~ 09 ~~ ' oR• ~- 'fjr / ~ 1 ~ OP~ ~ ~ 1 t _a I N V W~ t!~_q ~ „ y '~s P (' 4~ ` q ~ K ! L1R. ~`*~° oL oc°KCt~~ ~ to Z ~ 7 GLEN CO ~ ~ ~~f ~j6tENCOVE o klk~~~!!l ELEV. SCM. MONTCEAIR VICINITY MAP ~ ~=~ ~~ - -FSTGTFc ~-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY LINDA K. iYINGE ENGINEERING & 4914 NORTH SPRING DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 37.13-3-32 P-169 E-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY MARTIN CARLE ENGINEERING & 5515 TANSY DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 37.05- > -15 P-170 ~~.' ! NORTH ~ntt~cs nR d~ 0 d ~d ROANOKE COUNTY REGGIE LEMONS ENGINEERING & 7131 CEDAR CREST ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 26.20-2-43 P-171 ~i CAOSS'~~ERS ~ ~ RT41 ~~ ALL I/ .,_ ~~ 1 R ,' z 937 0~ ~~ .isa9 = 3 •/ ~ m G Iy~ 1830 ~~ 1~ Io ----~-•-- -lUN Y VICINITY MAP "/ ~ NORTH ~ I~/~ OLD MILL RD ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & PHILLIP DAY 7574 OLD MILL ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 95.03-2-1 P-172 -/ NORTH ROANOKE CD LINTY CLIFFORD FOUNTAIN ENGINEERING & 7045 STARLIGHT LANE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 97.03- > -12 P-173 E-~ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY JOSEPH STOWERS ENGINEERING & 3326 KENWICK TRAIL INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 87.06-3-35 P-174 E-~ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY ALICE HOLPP ENGINEERING & 1309 ASHEBROOK DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 79.01-2-1 P-175 ~^ NORTH ;~ ,, S~ ~~ ~~ d '~ n d ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & ROBERT M CRIGGER 2933 BELDON DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 25.01-1-26 P-176 E-/ NORTH o~° Av ORLANDO AV eh a ~ ~ 0 e~ ~ SITE a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x -~ ao ...... o VISTA AV ROANOKE COUNTY CARLOS R. & TERESA PACETTI ENGINEERING & 5339 ENDICOTT STREET INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 38.12-3-4 > P-177 ~~°r ~,.- ; ~ rot, ' ~ d e~~: z 60~ ~. ~ _~ ., Q ~ rat ~~__~~'HE ~'~~~l183 ° ~ J' ~ o p t A OS ~~ &,~ oo .. 'QQ ~' : o,,, ~ ,j Q 0~ W r ~ i~ ds~ - MUNTRI GF~ t~P ~ A ~~~ ROANOKE Q , _ VICINITY MAP E-/ NORTH entr[E DR ROANOKE COUNTY CHRIS LAif'RENCE ENGINEERING & 5342 HUNTRIDGE ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 40.09-4->0 P-178 E- / NORTH i -J/, ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA HODGSON ENGINEERING & 3717 KENTLAND DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 76.08-6-67 P-179 F-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY CATHY YDTKA ENGINEERING & 3930 yPESTMORELAND DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 77.13-4-35 P-180 NORTH S~ ......... A ~ ~ ~~ A ~ ~ A o W ~~ Cg $E~ ROANOKE COUNTY SAM ST.CLAIR ENGINEERING & 2850 SILVER LEAF DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 44.03-3-55 P-181 ~:-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY PAUL BLACK ENGINEERING & 7549 WILLIAMSON ROAD INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 27. > 1-3-9 P-182 E-/ NORTH ~4 ~ ~~ _ ~~~ ¢~°~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.. ~ ... ., srrE ..........~ dro~~~ ~ ...._.._. lY ~ ~~ ~d ROANOKE COUNTY DANNY RIVERS ENGINEERING & 2417 HORSEPEN MOUNTIAN CIRCLE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 50.04-3-87 P- J 83 ~.-/ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY LAWRENCE KELLY ENGINEERING & 3587 FARMINGTON DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 76.20-3-10 P-184 E- / NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY DOROTHY OVERSTREET ENGINEERING & 2725 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 87.14-4-15 P-185 E-/ NORTH 44 ~~ O ~' ..... $~ SITE ~~ ............. ~ t,'~' .. .. ~ x d ,~4 a^$ 44 ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & LUCILLE IANTOSCA 1313 DEER RUN DRIVE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 61.04-2-52 P-186 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. '~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND° The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for August 23, 1994. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance to rezone 2.0 acres from I-2 to C-2 to operate a garden center located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of John A. Hall. (2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a fast food restaurant located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Westmoreland Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Tacoma, Inc. (3) An ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow replacement only of individually sited single wide manufactured (mobile) homes throughout Roanoke County with a newer single wide mobile home. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. N- ~-3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for August 23. 1994. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~` ~ i r- e~,~ ~ ~ Paul M. Mahoney ~J~~~ County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date received: .. ~ received by:~ ~- - application fee;~ PC/BZA date:,. i • placer s issued 1 L ~ 1 ~ BOS date: ~~2 - Case Number ~ ~' p ~` ' }~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: John A . Hall Phone: (70 3) 774-4 Address: 4925 Starkey Road, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24014-4011 Zip Code:24014-40 Owner's name: John A . Hall Address: 4925 Starkey Road, S. W. Phone: (703) 774-4 Zip Code:24014-40 Roanoke Vir inia 24014-4011 Location of property: Tax Map Number: g7. 11 - 3 - 4 4925 Starkey Road, S. W. Magisterial District: Cave Spring Roanoke (Co.), Va. 24014-4011 Community Planning Area: Cave S p r i n g Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: I-2 I n d u s t r i a l 2.00 acres Existing Land Use: Construction Yard sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C-2 Commercial ~.srgrtuseo~iy Proposed Land Use: Garden Center useTyp°; Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) N/A of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v / Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application .,. Metes and bounds description x n : Proffers, if applicable Justification X Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the qwn Owner's Signature: By: ~~j w~ / (For) JOHN A. HALL Larry ar man, wner s gen orney n ac 41 11 •41 11 ~~ June 24, 1994 Page No. 2 Attention: Mr. T. L. Harrington, A.I.C.P., Director As explained, the pending sale of this property to Mulch N' More, a city based firm, for the purpose of establishing a Garden Center makes it necessary to have the zoning changed from I-2 to C-2 to conform to the various County codes and requirements. I feel that both Roanoke County and the citizens of the South- west County would benefit from this transition. Further, I firmly believe that a business of this type would not be harmful in anyway to the surrounding properties and if anything, would improve property values. Additional requirements pertaining to the operation of the pro- posed Garden Center will be fulfilled by Mulch N' More upon approval of the C-2 zoning classification and transfer of property. Any additional information required will be furnished upon re- quest. °, Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, ~ t,(J.~~~ Attorne In Fact ~~ v (For) JOHN A. HALL, OWNER lh Enclosures: Cc: Mulch N' More P. 0. Box 8396 Roanoke, Va. 24014 Attn: Rick Payne i V V ~~~ ~~ ~^ ~~.+-~' J o. ~ 1 N J J r / , ~ ff ~ ~ ~~ ~ '~ --~ - y /L 1 .~ sil 1~as i ------ -----_ ._. ----------- ~~ ~_ U~ \J Q N~. i ~ - ~~ s- p5'X~/ v~NS ~96~J/v1S 0 s 'ti.] -t v o • ~ C'1 q `~ G~ ,.: I STEEL 5ERUICES PROP Map._#g7~ 11 Zoned I-2 F- BENOIS ROAD - STATE RTE. 63~ ~ Etc i G,~ t APB-WHITING OIL COMPANY PROP. ( D.B. 909 PG. 815 Zoned I-2 ~ Map #87.11 - 3 - 5 Perimeter Fencing: Chain Link w/Barbed Wire I '-3 l - o ~ I ~ ~, c a O ~ ~, w .~ I X _ C O - O 4- O ~ O ~ O N . ~ ~ i O M ~ ] V ~ C ~ - ~ # ~F ~ I 1 41 ~ ( ° r -_ O N I N ed t0 Cl p M1 C X o0 ~ L'] F• N W +' 4! • ~ -~ I ~ m a~ rnm ~ o ~ a . m ~c o o_ I ~ ~ c~ o_ Q, m I Y ~ c~ ~ ~,1 .•+ - ~ ~ I ~ ' z 1 L ~ *a F-_m I ° ' C ~ m o w z wl~ t• ~ I ~ ~, .~,~ ~ a wi * - I ~ ~ ~ ~ z O ~ cn a~ w .-~ m mul m_ _~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ _ ~ ^ • _ sa~em } ' a. O ~ I m ° ° ~ Hl ti = ~ ~ } ~) c~ i sag ~ f . Y O I m Q I ~ • F- oC ~ QJ I o cn • +' +' -o I C X L7 ~ I W W - ~ C I ~ N ~ I r-I m I ~ ~ ~ ! c, c, I ~ ~ ~ " m l a m I o °I o. ~ o I ~ ~ f -. I v m z ~ ..-a I I m ( +~ ~ ~ - o se ~ e I _ ., ~ , ~X, (X, ~X, ~X, ~ ~« ...~ ~ rn in cwn aTTd~loo~ S auo~g ,~ ~ ~ L+ ( i-~ ~ X O O 47 - N z O1 +~ L O CO ~ i L!] U] N ~' ~ -~ ' ' - --'~ U71 -_- __~-_~_ W - .-- _ / ~ N Q: ~ I O ~ H Q~ ~ ~ Z .-~ I O ~ ~ C N x I ~ J c ~ / a a I • o N I ., / F- r. .. ~ a c O r- m . W L O • N +~ I O U O • [~ 7 t0 U W Z r7 N ca U p O uosdy a~asouog ~ I w .~ S £ ~ cn ~ l ~ O N a6eso~g - W W o v a 1 ( z U ° ~--~ o N .-I ~ a O Q N ~ O Q f rn W ~I x ~!] m x ~ - ~"'~ O ,t~ l0 {~ 1 S T O C ~ ~ Ip W N I t v U 4J O C ~ ~ ~ O F+ o mw - v ~c 3 a ~ .-i ~ cf] Q~ O N od O V O ' +a W ~ O ~ N J~ I iOZ ~ t t• f t t I 3 W N Q7 ( ?C N I U O ( v a~ cn m i rn~ I '°1 I--- 9 ~ N U E Y ~ c Ica U .,~ ~. O Y m I ~ ~ ~ U7 l0 ~ 117 ( n. ~ ~ ~ ~ m c I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ v p I E+ Z Iz E- •~uleW sod a~e~ , Zl. O ~ - Z_I pauoZ 90b 'gd L9h 'B'4 °'~' ° 'dONd SoION~l3a 'a 3ISSOl~ c.v O •~ r~ ca.= i ~ i~ I~ W a 0 a. Z w t- O N Y J O <L a: O Z ,~ _1 ROANOZCE COUNTY UTILITY DEP?~RTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT "NAT APPLICABLE" Date Name of Applicant Address of Applicant Name of Developer Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Phone Phone Phone Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLPIVIMETRIC NLi~IDER) Size of proposed development in acres: ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) Signature of Applican t _ , , : ,`; { ;~~ ~ ~~ : ! stir / ~ \1 t 4 /'Ob + ~ `~ • _ ~_ ~ _ •~ ~ ~e-~ ~'- s ~. .~ '~`= ~: ~/-y ~ - ! ~~ ! I ; `` ~ _ X2.3. ~- _ ~ • ' (~/ _. ~ i ' ~J- *' •~~( ~ .'~ ~ `~; f r~"~ ~ -~- r - ~ _, -. X _ - "`~-;rips s ~ ' J, _. ;. ~ ',_ ~~_ , ~ '-f--' ' ;...--. ~ ~ r ,,. O ~ :~.. 211 - .x ~ ~~- r----~ ~ t ~ ~ s ~ ' __r ~ , s ?' is i4 ~ ~. ~ ~ w4 F Y ; ~ 1 x •x ` :- ~`~ ~- _- i "~, z ;; ` q p::~ ~ -. • A V E N H A M # 2 ~ 1~ ~ ~`\ `~ ~ ~ - '~` ~ (LESLIE) OFF ~ ` _ a0 ~ "' - _ •_ ,/, ~ / ~ ,~ err ; '- ` _ x~~ "rft• ti.l~'y~f / -fir 1 ..'i~~ C af/~~ ~/) ~ _~ ~2 ?-•~t . :~ r e ~A • ~J" _ ppC_L :ice _ ~' ~ ~ ^ ~ ~-~ c t _ 126 ~ ,. . t Q ' ~j .ek. _ ~ '."• ~~= -~, ~ ~-.`" ]~. _ . ~ ! 1242-_ -- =.~ 2 "~ ~~ .F"... ~ _ '~"' ~,, y ~' y ~ . 1264 - 7~•~ - x ~ :.w`- ~ ~ 1249 ~ 4~ . - •6. ~ ~'~_ ~~' `x X52 ~P.; .. 2 ~. .~ ~_ ~ -,, _ ^"'' ~i r ~.'~ J ~ _ ~~ (241 NnIR_Cl ~' 12 _ NNR-n5 \ '1 ~ !~~ ~~~~L ~ ~f ~ ~~ .~! C 7 \o IC(UI ~ A~ ~. w~; ~~ ~^.'.(1 !y Q n.. Q~ll f ' '0O'I'_1.1~0) T - ~ f/~ a"`~av~' a ~ •Y' ,t~L~"RN~~ Q' ~ ~{ate G `i. v °y '1S s dr ~~T ~ ~S ;:04~ rw.tat~.•f '~Y'4b ..fn 3 ~~ ~t ~~/ i, ~ / .ST, ~ .ytv0 7 '~r~l m...~ "o a (`~ .~. ~~~yy ~?.y~ ~a ~t •~L~~~•i4 `o~ "OF ~ ~Mait gl4'~Wt ~• Aoa[n~cvn'" S'0{ • ~''1 '~ Q'^.h• ~~ c ~ ~73-~ ~'l~~\oi ~' /mil CJnW'i a" Yf ~+O (~ BEL~~'E},J/ A ~`~i t~ 11' \Y~tta-.`~ R[.~l~y~q#~P~~ ~•w`i.{l'[UOLI .Ir00 f~~:w%• ~ 7r •..T•i Q~`~.t. 'may,`. ;.~y°/~~ J'Jr r ~j } o ~f+y ~rl ~~ ~~ • s' ~:ii.-c .j" e~afliv.ri:aw ~i ~ ~./ n~5, iyt'uxrt C ~ • Y v'0"~ i! 1$PRIN~`FQ .t+'" ~ `~, ~~.cs+oo...~ws ~r. ~ t `~ tpyl,~p atb ~+"c"~ ~~,..'~. 9Q4 1341 tw`,•' f s ~ ~, r r,a.srfa S ,G'!-{per ^`~'~a~ ~ ~~y /~`. i't~j/, ~ Q _vuvnrrfi wiLLi r'+ ~ - ~~ ~lf,..f Sy a '! 7 ~Q~r I ~} ,~) ." ~,A O /'+-:... li..x yam. ~~ t. tlrcfr ~ ~~ ~3 / CC..11 a.~~U' ? `, y~r .•. _-..~7~E STERfi G`~r'~'C-tO ~ a0~e~ - l \q~akt !~ r fs.r.r a'f ~: j ` 1 r0~ • ~ ^ ..a.n.s 5 v+w F ...1~y~,~.1~~ "x~ NNYFOREST r11 ~ ~~ p~q. .fr. 1;, ~•;,. , ,y ,~ ICINITY MAP f':~~•o-~~~~ ~~~ _ H-f Q NORTH . _ ~' 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Petitioner. John A. Hall ~~ • AND ZONING Tax Map #: 87.11-3-4 ' Request: Rezone I-2 to C-2 I/,l COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX 1703) 772-2030 For staff use only dale eceiv (6r received b~./~- / ~' ' application fee: Y PC/BZA date: ptacac s ~uad:~~n BOS date: Case Number: ~ r Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ~ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE & ®VARIANCE Applicant's name: Phone: 703/666-9417 Address: Tacoma, Inc., 209 E. Main Street, Martinsville, VA 24112 Zip Code: Owner's name: Phone: Address: Richard H. & H.W. Perdue Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number:7713d414, 77,13-4~i5, 77.13-4~6, & Intersection of Brambleton Avenue & Roanoke VA Westmoreland Drive Magisterial District: Cave Spring , , Community Planning Area: Y Size of parcel (s): . 66 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: Commercial - C2 Existing Land Use: Retail/Commercial ~~ ~ ~ ' ~' Proposed Zoning: C2 ~ ............................. For StaN Use Only , Proposed Land Use: Fast food restaurant use Typo: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. - If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) 30.92-4 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Allow dumpster enclosure & paving in 25' buffer area. Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ~vs v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application ~~...: Metes and bounds description 'z;. Proffers, if applicable Justification t Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the proper~,y or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with th ow e g ~cgnscn~t pfth~twn i- 4.17 Owner's Signature: For Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant TACOMA, INC. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This request does not seek to change in any fashion the basic zoning of these parcels. Rather, it is a request to allow a special use of this tract for a fast food restaurant. This development is consistent with the stated purposes in the transition and core areas Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensive plan for Roanoke County calls for development of core areas contiguous to major arterials in a fashion similar to our plan. This is evidenced in the fact recent developments of Rally's and Burger King in the immediate area were approved by Roanoke County. ~~ Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. This development will allow the assemblage of these parcels into one tract with major improvements in both traffic flow as well as screening and buffering. While there is nn adverse impact on County utilities, the proposed plan does eliminate two (2) driveway entrances onto Brambleton Avenue. The site is to be graded and appropriate screening and buffering installed at required intervals. This will, no doubt, improve the situation existing at the current C-2 location. ""'~" L.~W OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT. FERGl1SON. NATT. AHERON ~ AGEE ~ PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT 1919 ELECTRIC R0.1 D. S. W. TELEVHONE MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON P. O. BOX 200G8 703-77••~ 197 EDWARD A. NATT FAx NO. M~CMAEL J. AHERON ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 703.7 74-096 ~ G. STEVEN AGEE 2401 MARK D. KIDD ELLEN KUO June 24, 1994 Terry Harrington, Director of Planning County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: Tacoma, Inc. Dear Terry: Enclosed please find identical applications for a special use permit and a variance which I am filing on behalf of Tacoma, Inc. I am also enclosing Tacoma, Inc.'s check in the amount of $230.00 which represents the filing fee for both of said requests. It is my understanding that the Board of Zoning Appeals will .meet on July 20, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. and, if a variance is requested, the Planning Commission would consider the requests for special exception on August 2, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. Should you need anything further, please advise. With best personal regards, I am, Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~~ ~oD4 Edward A. Natt EAN/sse Enclosures pc: Steve Mullens (w/enc.) HCMF Real Estate & Housing Management Corp Colonnade 1 2840 Electric Road, Suite 106 Roanoke, VA 24018 ,~ i ,~ oa Q. o W ~ ~ ~ ~ `~I W W ~~ ~~ V U ~ @ x ~~'~'W v ~2t`.°a. a ~ e~ ~r~~ ~~~ o0 1 SIN a `V O _j v W K .~ ~` e ~v o . J `II ~ -- - - --.. ~ :~ ~-,~ a ~ 3 0 -..... -- -- o '~. . U j o -- --- _... ~ ~ _ > ~ 0 ` ~ Z ,J Z ~ h ~---- - - -- -- o~~yZ .. o v ~ U ._.__ - --~---~ - - - qo~~ .~ C~ _~----_ . ~ - o ~ ti _ ~ ~ _ ~~ .. .. .. I I _ 8 ,der ~~ k~ th ~ Q ~_ --~_..._...__ +i N ~ ~ .. h d ~ ~~ N ..___. _ __~_ I _..__..-_.. ~ ~_ 8~N- - i6GZ/ /`~-OOH __._^__--= -- Fa -- --o s- '~ Go / ~,c~o~ 'l~n .. . ~/~/bQ ~Nb'7_,~0 153 ROAHO~CE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date June 24, 1994 Name of Applicant Tacoma, Inc. N- ~ Phone 703/666-9417 Address of Applicant 209 E. Main Street, Martinsville, VA 24112 Name of Developer Frith Construction Co, Inc. phone 703/632-7241 Address of Developer P.O. Drawer 5028, Martinsville, VA 24112 Name of Design Engineer_ Same as above. Phone Address of Design Engineer Jay Frith Name of Contact Person Tim Reith and/or Paul Shivley Name of Proposed Development Taco Bell Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Fast food restaurant - 1 unit Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLPNIrtETRIC NUhIDER) Intersection of Brambleton Avenue & Westmoreland Drive,'Roanoke, Virginia Size of proposed development in acres: .66 ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? x No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. ~ovE~) ~ ~~ Sign tore of 'cant ~' . SS.` ~ ~, o - f`.'r - ~ -4 N ~' ~ ~,j?~ _ Qom' .a- . S ' ~ ` ` -,.- - r 1 Y ! :r 1. ` ~~~ , `yS }y - ,. .o ~ _ ~Q. ~~ Y ~t ( is-_~$-. Y ,4 ~- .~~ ~: N ~ " ~. 4t- ~~ ti.p 01 `mot • = O }} jT{]~/~r(~''i..,~ ~ U ~\ ~ ?•~-1 ~. _ J ~~ ZOO ~_ .. ~., ~o- T w ~ c V r•_ -~ ` -~" its E~ S,ti .-~j "''~~y~~~"'" rn. „? ~ ~ _ N ^t ~ ` r " - ~ °~ ~ ~ WZ-, ,~ // <- ~~ ,oi- ,~.. ~: ..~~% ki`~},[S!""-~_T _- ~~f. )•'-~~ //y_,V. Gf pnJ ~bS < ~yp27/'•~~,, ir'i~ ! ° ~ \e~~ ~`a`q~ t - I ~ ICAEST~LLI ~ ~ ' ~ '~I "'~ d `~y'~Z~•1 v '~G' , \. ~~ ~ 8- oy: ~ V ~ ~0.~ '~4sat 1 ~j L, ASV" ` Q~ C~St4V+C MFX+MTS y ?°QO F~p.`a•`4)9 ~ ,.. '. cp+ .vc rt,_:pr ~~ ~ a.• ~,/ s,:w a ~ _p°' IEAI ,u ~ ~n;,ia- L + w,p. r ~ Y 4~~ ~, vLSat C Q91/ 33 y` i4\ \~ raa.+e[ W ,~. 1 ~ \`O_a T•• ~r'r,~ /OS" y~~4~~~ ~ -~f OY~~~: \••tJr{A WQ lOro .°..~[ a [a `J c+r~ ~'~'•''r' ti~cF/~, a~ +~ ~k;' ti':; .,,-': .,3, ciw.rw ' RD G'tl•.r~~1E. k y .+c Mf`: E. N'~ . ~ ~ 'b'_ ~: 4 c ~+ b.:.• 4I9 I`" : _ ~ r5s°f a~•~ ~~ • ~t waan ~::';... ~ ..' 4 ~Y ~ y4?ry ~ [rYw;. -\ ~,x ""4 O ~~ ~d5~~i~LL.\'019 /,(/` C). F[ t7, ;• Ca4TLE'ROCK FMg~ 4~~s7-L•ou...rn,4~ G`~:J K °q~'-''a~/\J~~\\~' `~'°~'' \' ~w/ Y `'[f"O~' ~ / , ,' ~~GN[[N. ~p •'~~ NGt OM/~ ` J~r~ ~ ~'1F i\ la°~ O ~4 ~~'~"`J • ,~ p~')'> ~tipyi ~ ~' •+JrWr *y~• 1 ~I ~yW~\P~~.ti ,.~' '/ ,p4'iREafl~ ACC~Y '~'i'. ~?)OiT1~H?M Cw~nr~ClY{Sry~~rc~~~ R L~:+. %Yfi:; ~~'\a.,`4 ~~ ) Prl_r ~ ~y% ,• HGTS. ° .-r \ 1 ~y s~~0 VE~•• v J~ :b ~'~, v. ~~4v ~~i~ a?~ i ~`~„[ ~'~lyYMeL a57 e~:J~ , ~li 4i~` fir, n 1+. ~ ~a~qp~ • / i/ •• •f;~4~r~"0 y\~ 1 ~6~ ~°'EiONHrLL E ~~ ~/~/l . i.',y c+ o/ 11 r 1~FR: t .wwo. 19 .~Q4` 1? q~ ~ ~ '. (,pNTLM1_ c4i Hrj(r~,,.o R52 ~ `,\c~ ~ 'LY ~~} !;•w`i I.~"`y\ Hl~~l- ,~_ ~ ?~' ,. ~- VICINITY MAP ..-.. _ •~ H-.~ NORTH ( J31~ ` / J~ x6,.711 373 4 ~ ~ rn••~~ •>bJJ ~ s'2 8 kRa~R • I . ye• ~ ]79k 6.91 Ac '~ Q' e.eeAt( ,, ~ 2 ~~ 6 SI / A.C.B S '/ 39.u m Zi 3 ~ Canry •ynrnrshvr;nr C. r)1 w ` ~ ° ~7 CC •ooR.C.RS 2.40Ae (D Jsos yu>'Ex x at` ~ 4'.Ai ~ O 3. Te Ac lC ~t 9~1 3 / \ RG3S'A r~ 9 Ja„ JSUy / ~ • Jo ar " seas ~ ` 7 s ~ ~ • ••'j5 z fi z m? in\; i ~ (). )11 393 ~ / 8 \ RGaa f \ JSa[ 39. ? N s 12 j1 T ~ ,fr03 aca ~ a ~ J9D ~[' ~o x 4 ., 3~ 2 I U ` r a 1 3 9s71 9 ~pC / II 9 Jr 1' ~ a x e 13.32Ac `b ~ / J A ~~ T l ~ ..~~ ~~ ~w rsi a •O ~ [7 qJ ~ o ~ N r a~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ : ~ w /! ~ ~ 37 S6 a Si ' J97/ r ~ ~ + >b ~ [r n Mau / a ~ ~ bs .' 61 ,. ~ a `dip : v °iu .. ~ ~ IS z,,~.., ~ ,py 62 , ~ r~ ~ J. y ~ ~ 19 / >.rs p6p a ., ~~ 5 ~ ~ / , i ~ spa , ~~I J'~ ~~4°' ~ ~, • sss ~ R a' J9oe 2 ~ 46 ° ~ s''•° Z ~~ ~ J,s ~ i y~ ~y' 2S x yr~j tJ ~ ~ ~ _. a7J + 43 ~ 6 ~'waw 0: / ~ 1 If GoV \ .ice. a N 1/. ~ i 2 c ssrz ~ ~ zs . • ~ s 2~r +ow ~ L7 ,aro `sir ~ ` ~ .i `G ~ ~ i °"[ J ~~ 29 'f ~ 33•K .42 b r ~ sox ozs 39x6 ~ , ~ '~ 3 • -~ 4("[ ~ ~oos 30 ~~St H I . J ` ~ \ aJ ~ ~ • 40 sJ seoo a ~ ~ . ~-~ r , sais ~ yrol .. ~ as c o / , s , ~ lsas A~1- ~ 'J9 'q J. ~' 136 ' 23 Jai 'b `,s / 38 • 24 ~ 1 ~' rro~' I accD) ~ p ~ sJ ~ '~ `1 •~ 4~06c ~~ ~ 1 AeIC) ~~ ` 21 }srf~ a ~ ~~ a»e u 20/ 'b 4 II 3T ~ M j (~ 1.28 At I0 ~ {8 J~J. \ ~~ l ISAc K) ]9a2 ~ / rJ N R~ L ~J 1: ~ Ip0 1D0 O . _ ~' • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Petitioner: Tacoma, Inc. ~~ ~ AND ZONING Tax Map #: 77.13-4-14, -15, -16, -17 + -• Request: Special Use Permit for Fast Food Restaurant ~.,~ -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT ONLY OF INDIVIDUALLY-SITE SINGLE-WIDE MANUFACTURED (MOBILE) HOMES THROUGHOUT ROANOKE COUNTY WITH A NEWER SINGLE-WIDE MOBILE HOME WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 2, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support this amendment to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 30, (Appendix A) "Zoning Ordinance" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: SEC. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures, or Land. (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming Class B or Class C manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record may be replaced with a Class A or Class B manufactured home provided the installation of the Class A or Class B manufactured 1 fF-3 home complies with the district setback regulations for principal structures and the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-9 (L) b., and c.. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ZONING/MOBILE.HM 2 ...~. F ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Certain Sections of Chapter 20. Solid Waste Pertaining to Expanded Definitions, Specific and Supplemental Collection Categories and Services, Bulk and Brush Collection, and Effective Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~7,y,N,,,~.~-c/' Gc~~`' '`~~~~~ BACRGROUND: The Board was provided the background information during the June 28, 1994 work session. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a copy of a Solid Waste Ordinance revised by the County Attorney. These revisions clarify and simplify many of the provisions as discussed previously. After lengthy discussion at the work session of the issues regarding the new bulk/brush program, the collection of townhomes/ condominiums and the collection on private drives, the Board directed the staff to implement the changes which would be reviewed after a six month period. The first reading of the ordinance was held on July 12, 1994. The effective date of the ordinance will be September 1, 1994. At the Board's request the expiration date was removed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the Solid Waste Ordinance. SUBMITTED BY: Gardner W. Smith, Director Department of General Services APPROVED: r } S ~ /'' f ,. L -7~'r't''i ~ ~.. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator t ~i ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Rohinke To MinniX Nickens J J~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 12, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 20. SOLID WASTE PERTAINING TO EXPANDED DEFINITIONS, SPECIFIC AND SUPPLEMENTAL COLLECTION CATEGORIES AND SERVICES, BULK AND BRUSH COLLECTION, AND EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that the provisions of Chapter 20. Solid Waste of the Roanoke County Code are in need of amendment in order to address the increasing demands and need for services by the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at a work session held on June 28, 1994, directed that this ordinance shall be adopted and implemented; and WHEREAS, the first reading was held on July 12, 1994; the second reading was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain sections of Chapter 20. "Solid Waste" be amended to read and provide as follows: SOLID WASTE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 20-1. Definitions. The following words and terms, as used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: .. I~tdus~rxal ': w,~~t® >.means and ~a~.~,r~ ~ast~, ger~~~~~~c~ ;, >: hat : ~~ `~e ~ : ~ e~~. a l ~,. prvv ~,d ~c~::::~vn~~:~n;er~:~:>: "~..1 ~-" ~ w ,.~. ....ti.,,, terra--..~~ ~~t~s-g~p~~ ~~p~-mss`' , } s.ui ~-~e-~a~es--~r~~~g~-rem-~e-~rs e-e Sa-~t~-iiF35rc~-d~Spv~cri~rrcc~6,:ir@'act-cv=rTV~r'rE~-c=-6pci~~e~--~'~-~~ ~.J ^` 1 ARTICLE II. COLLECTION BY COUNTY Sec. 20-21. Article not applicable to Town of Vinton This article shall not apply to residents or commercial or industrial establishments of the Town of Vinton, Virginia, an incorporated town lying within the boundaries of the county, since the council for the town has provided for solid waste collection for the residents of the town. (Code 1971, 14-7) Sec. 20-22. Responsibility of county administrator under article. The administration of this article, including the establishment of a budget for providing effective solid waste collection service; the hiring of all employees necessary for providing such service; the billing of persons receiving such service; all other matters related thereto shall be the responsibility of the county administrator, provided that all matters pertaining to the establishment of an annual budget and the establishment of collection rates and charges shall be approved by the board of supervisors. (Code 1971, 14-5) Sec. 20-23. Right to and application for, service. All county citizens, including businesses, firms and corporations located in the county shall be entitled to receive solid waste collection service consistent with the provisions of this article, subject to the determination of the county administrator regarding economic feasibility of providing such service to any particular location. Any person desiring such service shall make application through the office of General Services. Payment, if required, for one-quarter year's service shall be made in advance at the time of application. 'DC~~~9"Q'rC~SCTP"S~i a-~P1 ,Tf77 / 4 S- E ~-~-~}rs~ess a~a~~~~~e~-n-e --~e~ e e~e '' ' ~ ~ ~e~ i-~rs#.i~ti~ e~a n , -ee-s -l~e a •• •• {- -~ {- ' ~ L. ' b. u l .. ~ •• a j •• GTCr A r~'~'Ct R'GTS e-' 7TlZS='1~J ~ lT~ F TTG ~.. " ~ - c }~ ~ u, a .. i.. i ,.,a ~ii3 c'i~=e ' e3 r r ~3~-iii ° i ~, ~-~'~ } ~ ' a ti• ~' na-r ~~3~-~ ~eS 6r- n~trc cre3'~S ~.~ -zcrt39 j r 1 i i ~ ~ i i ~ a ~ ' ~-~- a- ~ te a,.,.... ...~ n3z? } ~-Sr cci-r~-crczzrrc~ Y ~P ~3 3S cr puS ~...,. ; es e =a ~~ee~-3 T-o - ~te-~e-~ e~a~e z ~~ z-~ ~ --a-z ~~ ~ ~~ " ea~ege es- ~ i ' a } i ~ ~ n ..T~ nom, ...~-. ~ ", dLdL+T]! e~ST~r\\ 6~~3E~~17e~~i TT9*T,TT "~TTT T* I i L 2 n ~T~ ^T ~~*Tm~. ~ 7~R~\p T'IODT -nry Tn wL+ !\T ! 1~-D'pD'1T1 1 S S C~ 'I'lai ~~ "" TaI~TO~ 7-~7~7") ~ T TTTI RIT /\TTT L: TLT L~TTITTT y / a \ + T l l ~ .. L.1 ... L.... ,~. ~- } ~ ii ~ mZ~.r7-'IRL~ '~7 e SQ37'.~75"S~e "1 J _ . . . _ r _ _~ ~iu.~ e}}~~~~El`-~6rrt~iTJ a-rvrr6i~F'3-~6~czr~~313zcrrrE' si 1 1GV V _ r i~3~-eel-e~--e~~~ es-~ pus-sir psi ~~-cxx'Qra co-~ vi . ~- , a ,.... ~. ,. . ,ti, i s i a \ ., i a c„e ems 8 i S.iGL 1 ] ~ ~ . ~e -fi ~ ~ ~ =~ei-e ~~ «P =cmc= ~ '"'' e - -ec re ~s ~es~g~reP a i ~ v.,. } p = ~ ti, ~.ti, . .. . n few--' a J ~ ice. ~f e€~ee~ €-~e~~a€~ Sec. 20-24. Specific collectlo~ categories. .s= i ~Dt#: feet ri~> leis :>:..:::: ~ ,g Q~~mank s~ Sec. 20-25. Supplemental collection service. (3)° wring leaf sea~un, w2~ic~_ i~ de~~,ne~ a ~.... 10 s 11 ::;::::::>::: r::yy~:..:::::::::i:::::: ~: ::::>::> '''1r.Qr.~~:l:~ si e A i v°~i~$~r'~-6-r-carca i ' i.wrw -~rccm-~ _' ~ c~i8~ ~ AwA ac~- 1~ C.. sz-9~ =1~ic~ 1~@ 2.. 7 3~az 06~ i i ,..,.~..a wig: -~-@vc i., , e6~3 ~'3~ ^' a -' 3~ T-~3~€e-~~-eirF- -~t~eei~-ee~e~ 1 ~ ~ w eF __..- e~s e~e i ~ --F~ei e ~:- ~ j ~Eta- l ~e~e~i j ~ =~-~ V e ' ~ _ s~ _= ~t - ~ Tl~- - ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ s, s ~e ~a s e ~ ~ _ ~ ~e €~rg~ a~~t-~e ~a~e~s , -~~ t-e-~e~ s~-e~ w*- ~ , ~' ..} ~'- e ~~a~ s~ ze~ •es ~1 a~e~e ~ ~ ~ ~ -i- }- sti-~ a ~ ~ e- ~~~ ~ i~ G F e~; s~e ~ - ~ eke ~ es , ~ s ~ g ~ r res s es r ~ '~ ~ ; ' ~~ tir ~- ~ ~t-r-~ ~a~ 1-e-s-- i ~e; s~e a~-~e-- ~ es-- e i~~~e 3 s~ € i e s}~ rg~ , , f~ R -- ; ~ ~3 w e- s- ~ ~ ~- e~ ~ ~ ~ € . { -e e~ i~te f~~Ti~ I~ ''~ = p e-~ e~-- ~r~ae~ res . t l ee~e e~e~i i~ s~a ~e~-# ~i~ e e ~t~i - €-- e- ~~ s~ge~-~ - e~e~ ~ e ez ~s- s a --s - - e- - ~~~esg e~s - ~ e r e~re~ e e ~ 1 a~a~re~rea 12 ~- ~ l l ~r € ~- t ~~ 3-~ee~e~ - =_ -a - e~rs e~ es~e ee - -ee ~t ' t ~ ~ e~Te ~re~t -~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ^ ee l _ a~ ~ ~,j.. .,., , t.. ~ ; .. ; ~ ., a _ ~'t ~a-1 - ~-f~6 -eE 6 ~i4 ~ T- ~i cz~r@ 9~i a ~B _ r---------- / ~•• . a } / ~,. ~.....~, .....a .., , .. l ~ / .. ~ .. ~,. ~ .. i .~. .~F-~ te C H~ c~ -~i r R1 S 6 2. Effective date. That the provisions of this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after September 1, 1994. code/solid.ws[ 13 -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 12, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-4 AMENDING AND REENACTING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 20. SOLID WASTE PERTAINING TO EXPANDED DEFINITIONS, SPECIFIC AND SUPPLEMENTAL COLLECTION CATEGORIES AND SERVICES, BULB AND BRUSH COLLECTION, AND EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that the provisions of Chapter 20. Solid Waste of the Roanoke County Code are in need of amendment in order to address the increasing demands and need for services by the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at a work session held on June 28, 1994, directed that this ordinance shall be adopted and implemented; and WHEREAS, the first reading was held on July 12, 1994; the second reading was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain sections of Chapter 20. "Solid Waste" be amended to read and provide as follows: SOLID WASTE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 20-1. Definitions. The following words and terms, as used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: ..yyyy~~~ .' ... },~. ~~'::::' ~. ~.rit. YY:Ft3,.,4~i,.,~G::::i~'~::~i:.L.4~;::::~~~,.'(w..f,.:::::.::::.>::::ii:::::5::i:£:i::::::.>:.::.:::.: ~:.:> ~:.:::.;:.:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::............................ ~-~-~a--w-~~e~tea~.r~-a-~~ag 1.,~.. • ,. ~ ~-ea~~ zr~s~---~~ ~ ~ i ~ i. 3- ^. F ~_ ...,, a F; i i ., Y Tn~razc~ aTr~-~~~PB~e~' }-zi ~ua~-6 L L. l l L. e--'r.7TtGS~.7 ~ L. .ti "k1 ~ i. p-~ a Qr~Vr .~vi j ARTICLE II. COLLECTION BY COUNTY Sec. 20-21. Article not applicable to Town of Vinton This article shall not apply to residents or commercial or industrial establishments of the Town of Vinton, Virginia, an incorporated town lying within the boundaries of the county, since the council for the town has provided for solid waste collection for the residents of the town. (Code 1971, 14-7) Sec. 20-22. Responsibility of county administrator under article. The administration of this article, including the establishment of a budget for providing effective solid waste collection service; the hiring of all employees necessary for providing such service; the billing of persons receiving such service; all other matters related thereto shall be the responsibility of the county administrator, provided that all matters pertaining to the establishment of an annual budget and the establishment of collection rates and charges shall be approved by the board of supervisors. (Code 1971, 14-5) Sec. 20-23. Right to and application for, service. All county citizens, including businesses, firms and corporations located in the county shall be entitled to receive solid waste collection service consistent with the provisions of this article, subject to the determination of the county administrator regarding economic feasibility of providing such service to any particular location. Any person desiring such service shall make application through the office of General Services. Payment, if required, for one-quarter year's service shall be made in advance at the time of application. i 4 ~6~t ~~~~3~t6 - t3~t2~i~~&~-- - - - - ~~~c~•~-ur~~'ri~ircrr~-~c~ - - ... ~ ..... er} ' - T ~ ~ ,..ice.-. ,.,a .rs T' r .... ~ ,,,, } ~ ~- w ' i.. , ..±. TiZ- 'e CCrr $i~ • A.71R~ c ~ '~~ p ~7 G72 G R 'C-~~'+~"e' a-~~~6i~e-i~E3~~g Z ' T^ GT~ Tt T' ~(? ~ y, e'tt"-TJ'~-cr- ~++1 L. , ~- T ~ ycT ~-E}} 1 ~ • ~' 'C'L~ ~'~'e~e'r. GTe'~""~. Gf' ~ ' S'G~ 1• .. 1 , •= / }'' } ~ L... ~~--~a~ ~ ~~-~ s~e~--ag-~~ ~.TS-~e a~es~~a--e ~e3 ~ ~ a ~. ,~ S~~GII V b. ,, i ~/K~" "' i.. a F' ,~ ,.~~,y _ C-Cl•GTSSrCR~~ crSSu~ tea,.,-.,, =~rC ~ ~ ~. n ~ ^ -,r,-cr~`~-CR CC y, , l L. T n 'S2-=C~'SQ' F l , ~v.~.~~6;~-~~~-vz'rc n GTt} r~fc' +-.-...... a i~ @-gci-~11F~~} ~•.L... -0 a .. U n., ~-., l~nlUfww nF-_ r,nn /'vTTnivML~D ' I L nrR~ L+ TT~T T\ TT.T ITTfTTTR7TAATTT . /tea ~ r a a ' ~ ' ~-}~ accrrrcc-cncrr~cs~-=o i ~3~l--iziei~e~6~-6;~ ~ti` ~ crai ti.,,,., ~ L. _ F l l F ,#Tt fir. a. e ~e-~~-ee~~-e~-~rg e-F 11 a , ,.-.}..a . ~n'1 7 n n Fi..-. ~F-_ '1 '~ n n Lam.. .~ yL. n n~ Cnn Fr..-mot rJ vr--S~p-~-rccc rn7 Inn F...~. ~-_ G V 7 nTITY" nG4~~ OO n~n~C nn~ ~ nnn F.-.~,~ 7'~1Tj Qa~~ iF~ n ~ ,.~ ~ ~ u.~ -- ---ai~H -- eS-~T } .,i.,~ ~ ..~ a,.Y.- - f -~ ~ t' } i v-rr.~ cy i z, a ' a n a- ' a r } ~, ~ ~. ~ a N e~e j ~ s r a • ..i.. '~ i-~'~ ~ ,.a nr ~ ~ ~~~i~ / ~ ~-~'c -i -~ ~ ° ~ ~l~l ~~e~c ~ .,u. ir~=„ c ~e~ ~ Q~ec-T.T--au~rei e.~ ~"' ' ,~cct~-r^vir t`1~3E~-e~~ a' ~ ~~ r r i r Sec . 2 0 2 4 . ;,:~?»<::<:;::::>:::<::<«::<::«::<>::<:<::;;:.>«:.:>:.«<:,<;:::«::.;<::«:::.;:::::<::<;:«<:.::<:::<;:::::::::.::::::.:::::. ~~, t> '> ~ ..I~! Sec. 20-25. Supplemental collection service. 10 u. :~ :;-.:.;;;:.;::.;; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.::::::..:::::::::::::.:::::.::.::::::.::::::.:::::.:...: . >:~> : eta ~::>«:rah>:»:>:.;:.;;~ ::::::::::::::.::::::::~:::..::::.;::::::: ;:::::.;::.;~::::::.::::::::::::::.::::.::::.. 11 ::.:;: ~.,::: <::...::; : ;<:::: <: ;;> «:> . ; ::. ; amens:;>:::<::~~::.:«:»:>::r~ ~~:r ~~~'`~1~7t...... } " ~r- ~' ~6i ~ - }ccr c-vzs r6zi- a'ci T-Tr ti--vt 6 crc~c uz~ s ~ -,- ~ ~A;d~2S-uzr ~ ~ ~3^cz z~s ~ ~ r ~ z-zr~t3~~ ~~ ~ i i / ~ ~ i 12 e~a~-mss , i., i ,., a ~ i.... i ; i.., i ~ GcG ~ .~u~'tiC-aTl--TGy-u 1 f..L ~...1 ~ r r ~~6-- 6i 1 ''ar~~r'~6i~-~ez~ l l ..l l ~ F -~ 1 v. G.. T ~~~__-j __- ~'' r -_ - e~ ~ ~ ~ } iuc u ~+ y l ~ ~- '-' `' ~' ' ea~~ee~re~~1 r --~e a e j 2. Effective date. That the provisions of this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after September 1, 1994. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 13 Distribution: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Don C Myers, Assistant Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Gardner W. Smith, Director, General Services Michael Lazzuri, Court Services 14 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 12, 1994 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Mrs. Chris Pickard, Alternate, will expire August 31, 1994. (Mrs. Pickard is being appointed to serve a one-year term as a regular member replacing Mr. Edmund J. Kielty.) 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Four-year term of William G. Rosebro, Medical Representative, expired June 30, 1994. Mr. Rosebro has advised that he does not wish to serve another term. Chief T. C. Fuqua reports that at their meeting on July 13, 1994, the Fire & Rescue Chief's Board recommended that Chief Bobby Fronk from the Cave Spring Rescue Squad be appointed to this commission. Chief Fronk advises that he is willing to serve. 3. Social Service Advisory Board Four-year term of Harry C. Nickens, Board Liaison will expire August 1, 1994. SUBMITTED BY: ~' ~~ Brenda J. olton Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens June 14, 1994 3 73 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 14, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend George Pearson, Southview United Methodist Church. The Pledge of June 14, 1994 - 375 interest in establishing a separate joint meeting with each governing body in the Roanoke Valley after new members take office. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the resolutions with a change that would reflect that the request be sent to the chief elected official from Chairman Eddy. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 61494-i.a REQIIESTING A JOINT MEETING AITH THE ROANORE CITY COIINCIL TO DISCIISS I38IIES OF MIITIIAL CONCERN WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke have joined together to solve many community issue: in a spirit of mutual cooperation; and WHEREAS, recent examples of these cooperative efforts include the Roanoke valley Resource Authority, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, regional enforcement of vehicle decal violations, a regional approach to library services, and joint funding of regional projects such as the Virginia Explore Park and the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau; and WHEREAS, there are other issues that should be addressed on a regional basis, and shared problem that can be resoled by shared solutions; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to look at additional areas where local governments can r June 14, 1994 ~2 7-~ RESOLIITION 61494-1.b REQIIESTING A JOINT MEETING AITH THE BOTETOIIRT COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS TO DISCIISS ISSIIES OF MIITIIAL CONCERN WHEREAS, the County of Botetourt and the County of Roanoke have joined together to solve many community issues in a spirit of mutual cooperation; and WHEREAS, recent examples of these cooperative efforts include joint economic development projects such as Tweeds and Hanover Direct; membership in the Economic Development Partnership; joint ownership of Read Mountain Fire & Rescue and the Blue Ridge Library; and their strong support for Roanoke County's All America City Award; and WHEREAS, there are other issues that should be addressed on a regional basis, and shared problem that can be resolved by shared solutions; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to look at additional areas where local governments can work together to provide a better quality of life for all citizens; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors welcomes an opportunity to meet with other governing bodies in an informal setting to share ideas and concerns about future regional activities, including a format for each elected official to express his or her views on the subject; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors intends to extend similar invitations to meet with other local June 14, 1994 379 include membership in the Economic Development Partnership; approval of an extraterritorial arrest agreement; regional enforcement of decal violations; a regional approach to library services; and joint provision of services such as Social Services, VPI Extension Services, and the Roanoke County/Salem Jail; and WHEREAS, there are other issues that should be addressed on a regional basis, and shared problem that can be resolved by shared solutions; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to look at additional areas where local governments can work together to provide a better quality of life for all citizens; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors welcomes an opportunity to meet with other governing bodies in an informal setting to share ideas and concerns about future regional activities, including a format for each elected official to express his or her views on the subject; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors intends to extend similar invitations to meet with other local governing bodies in the Roanoke Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia extends an invitation to the Council of the City of Salem to attend a joint meeting of both governing bodies at a June 14, 1994 2 Q 1 WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to look at additional areas where local governments can work together to provide a better quality of life for all citizens; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors welcomes an opportunity to meet with other governing bodies in an informal setting to share ideas and concerns about future regional activities, including a format for each elected official to express his or her views on the subject; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors intends to extend similar invitations to meet with other local governing bodies in the Roanoke Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia extends an invitation to the Council of the Town of Vinton to attend a joint meeting of both governing bodies at a time after July 1, 1994 and a place that is mutually acceptable. 2. That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Mayor of the Vinton Town Council for consideration. 3. That, subject to a favorable response from the Vinton Town Council, the Roanoke County Administrator is directed tc~ make the necessary arrangements for the joint meeting through the Town Manager. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: June 14, 1994 3 83 Attorney) R-61494-2 Mr. Mahoney advised that the Virginia Association of Counties requested that counties present their legislative proposals for the VACO legislative steering committees. Roanoke County also develops its own proposals such as amendments to the County charter. He presented three proposals to be included in the VACo's legislative program: (1) Restoring full funding of HB 599; (2) Basing education disparity funding upon the localities' ability to provide funds and their local efforts in support of school funding; and (3) Restoring fringe benefit funding for Constitutional Officers. Supervisor Eddy asked that the resolution be sent to the Roanoke Valley legislators in addition to VACo. supervisor Johnson moved to approve the legislative program and that copies of the resolution be sent to the Roanoke Valley members of the Virginia General Assembly and the Virginia Association of Counties. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 61494-2 RECOMMENDING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COIINTIES FOR THE 1995 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide - ~ June 14, 1994 385 VACo for the 1995 session of the Virginia General Assembly. 2. Education I. Disparity funding should be based not only upon the number of students eligible for free or reduced fee lunches, but also upon the locality's local tax effort in support of education. II. Disparity funding should be based upon the composite index (which measures a locality's relative fiscal ability to provide its share of the cost of a local school system that meets the standards of quality) and the locality's local effort in support of that school system. 3. Fringe Benefits for Constitutional Officers I. The General Assembly did not restore funding for constitutional officers' salary fringe benefits for FY 1996 (SB 560, which did not pass, would have increased sheriffs' fees to offset the fringe benefit costs) . II. Restoring this funding must be a top priority for VACo for the 1995 session of the General Assembly. II That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties. June 14, 1994 3 8~ retirees could be added to the County and School employee dental insurance without changing the premiums for the 1994/95 fiscal year. She requested authorization to add retirees to the plan with the retirees paying 100$ of the premium cost. Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve inclusion of the County and School retirees in the Dental Plan. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 6. Request for Approval of Additional Compensation Board Funded Positions in Sheriff and Clerk of Circuit Court Offices. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) A-61494-5 Mr. Hodge advised that the Compensation Board had approved an additional position for the Clerk of Circuit Court's office in 1993/94, but the funds were used for part-time help. Circuit Court Clerk Steve McGraw is now requesting that a full- time position be added because there will be sufficient funds for part-time positions in the 1994/95 budget. Mr. Hodge further advised that the Sheriff's Office has received funding from the Compensation Board for four temporary Corrections Officers and one permanent cook. The total cost for the positions is $124,334 with the Compensation Board funding $89,753. The remaining funds will be absorbed within the Sheriff's existing budget. June 14, 1994 3 89 because local cellular companies have not separated their customers by jurisdiction, which they are now attempting to do. Mr. Mahoney further explained that the term "service address" is the address that a customer uses when he or she signs up for the service. There were no citizens to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading with the public hearing and second reading set for June 28, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 18-168 "Schedule of Charges" of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for an Increase in Base Charges of 14..5% for Fiscal Year 1994-1995, an Increase in Base Charges of 25$ for Fiscal Year 1995-1996, an Increase in the Connection Fee to $1500 00, and to Provide for Certain Transition Provisions to Im lenient Same. Diane A att Director of Finance Mr. Hodge reported that the staff has been meeting with the Homebuilders Association to develop an increase in sewer rates to fund the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plant. Staff is recommending the following: (1) a 14.5$ sewer rate increase on July 1, 1994 and a 25$ increase on July 1, 1995. The connection fee will increase from $500 to $1,000 effective June 14, 1994 391 `` There were no citizens to speak on this issue. Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the first reading with the public hearing and second reading set for June 28, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement, Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms. (Gary Robertson, IItility Director) There was no discussion and there were no citizens to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading with the public hearing and second reading set for June 28, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 5. Ordinance Authorizing AcQUisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension. (Gary Robertson, IItility Director) Supervisor Eddy asked why the water line could not be constructed in the road right-of-way. Mr. Robertson responded that the shoulder was too small and it would be dangerous because of the traffic. June 14, 1994 393 Article IV, Self-Insurance Program, by Establishing a Program to Retain Certain Risks and Manacre Claims Resulting from Public Liability. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 0-61494-6 Ms. Hyatt advised that the County has now accumulated sufficient reserves to pursue a self-insurance program for general and automobile liability. By June 30, 1994, the County will have accumulated $1,000,000 in insurance reserves and the County will save $182,403 in insurance premiums which will be set aside to pay claims that occur during the 1994/95 fiscal year. There were no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance with deletion of sentence on page 8. The motion carried by the following recorded vo~e: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 61494-6 AMENDING CI-iAP'IER 2 'ADMIIVISZRATION' OF 'I13E ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADOPTION OF A NEW ARTICLE IV 'SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM', BY ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM TO RETAIN CERTAIN RISKS AND MANAGE CLAIMS RESULTING FROM PUBLIC LIABILITY WHEREAS, Section 15.1-7.3:1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the governing body of any county, city, town or any political subdivision thereof, to provide for liability insurance or self-insurance to cover the costs and expenses incident to liability arising from the conduct of officers, employees or volunteers in the discharge of their official duties; and, WI-~REAS, Chapter 11.1 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia authorizes political subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia to establish or participate in self-insurance pools; and, June 14, 1994 395 create any third parry beneficiaries under the Program. This Program creates no vested rights or property interests in anyone except as required by Statute and may be amended at any time by the Boazd of Supervisors. Sec.2-81. DEFRJI'TIONS A. 'Covered Person' means a County officer, County employee, or volunteer. B. 'County 08icei" means a member of the Board of County Supervisors, a constitutional officer, an elected official, or a member of a boazd, commission or authority which is appointed by the Board of Supervisors or performs functions of the County, e.g., Electoral Board, Board of Zoning Appeals. C. 'Employee' means a person other than a volunteer or County officer who performs services for the County, is paid wages or a salary by the County in exchange for services, and who is subject to direction by County officers or their designees. The term also includes persons who perform functions of the County, e.g., Registraz. The term specifically excludes independent contractors. D. 'Volunteer" means a person other than a County officer or employee who performs services for the County without remuneration and w;io performs them subject to direction by County officers or employees and who is registered as such with the Count}~s Department of Human Resources. E. 'Occurrence' means an event or accident that results in personal injury or property damage. F. `Personal injury' includes 1. death, bodily injury, sickness, shock, intentional infliction of mental anguish or mental injury. 2. false arrest, false imprisonment, wrongful eviction, wrongful detention, malicious prosecution, or humiliation, 3. libel, slander, defamation, invasion of rights to privacy, infringement of June 14, 1994 ~97 2. Any premiums on appeals bonds required by any suit defended by the Program. 3. All reasonable expenses incurred in the investigation or defense of any claim or suit. Sec. 2-83. RISKS COVERED BY THE PROGRAM In accordance with Section 2-82 of this Program, the County shall indemnify against personal injury or property damage losses arising from actions or inactions taken or not taken by or on behalf of the County or its related agencies in such amounts as the county shall approve, after it is determined that: A. indemnifying against such losses would have a beneficial effect on the County's ability to employ and retain qualified employees, or B. indemnifying against such losses would otherwise further the Count}~s lawful responsibilities without detrimentally affecting the Counts responsibilities as a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In the e-~ent the County chooses to limit indemnification, it shall notify the employee of such limitation in a reasonable time following receipt of the claim. Risks covered by the Program include: A. Property damage (including consequential damages when not due to other causes excluded by the Program) to or loss of real and personal property owned by the County or property owned by others that is under care, custody or control of the County. 1. Property damage shall include: a. the expense of removing damaged property and debris (other than building foundations) after any covered loss, b. expenses incurred to reduce or prevent actual or imminent loss or damage as long as these expenses are less than the loss or damage being reduced or June 14, 1994 399 f. loss to property other than motor vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft by mechanical breakdown, including rupture or bursting by centrifugal force, g. loss to aircrafr, standing timber, trees, shrubs, lawns, growing crops and livestock, h. unexplained loss or mysterious disappearance, or shortage disclosed upon taking inventory, and i. loss resulting from normal aging of equipment, buildings, or other property. B. Workers' Compensation -The County will pay workers' compensation benefits to employees and volunteers who are injured by accident or who develop a disease caused by their employment when required by Title 65.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, hereinafter "the Act"). The employee must notify the County of any return to employment, increase in earnings, or recovery for injury from third parties and if the employee fails to so notify the County, the Counts obligation to pay benefits will terminate. The County reserves its subrogation rights as provided in the Act. Al.l_rnm~la. .,,-,-';,,, ,, ,, .~ re,..,..nr~n~ o ..1 ...,,.,... ..1...11 _'- _'_ - -' -' - - ~""~ t"°* ~~"' ~~v 't"° *" t ' ' 't , '" Benefits shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of State law and the provisions of the Roanoke County Employee Handbook as amended from time to time by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. This workers' compensation coverage does not apply to: 1. individuals not employed by the County, 2. persons providing services to the County as independent contractors, 3. non-County employees injured or exposed to occupational diseases on County property, and 4. employees receiving medical treatment provided by a physician not June 14, 1994 401 The Program will not pay collision and comprehensive damage claims for County owned or leased motor vehicles. These repair expenses or losses shall be the responsibility of the County department, agency, or officer to which the motor vehicle is assigned. D. Comprehensive General Liability including Law Enforcement Legal Liability and Public Officials' Liability. The Program will pay claims for liability imposed upon a covered person for personal injuries and property damage or loss because of the acts, errors or omissions of a covered person in the course of his duties on behalf of the County. Not included in this comprehensive general liability coverage are County employees whom the covered person may have injured in the course of their employment (because such employees have coverage under the Workers' Compensation section). E. Medical Services -The Program will pay claims, if based solely on error, negligence, omission or mistake, arising out of medical services which were rendered or which should have been rendered by any duly qualified medical practitioner, nurse or technician employed by the County or acting at its request. The Program will provide coverage only to the extent that the losses exceed the medical professional's other insurance coverage and to the extent of the Program's limit of liability. G. Faithful Performance Blanket Bond Liability -The Program will indemnify the County for loss caused through failure of any County officer, volunteer or employee, acting alone or in collusion with others to perform faithfully his duties or to account properly for all monies and property received by virtue of his position or employment. Sec. 2-84. LIlVIITATIONS ON AND ~CLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE A Ezcess Coverage - In no event shall the County indemnify the amount of any liability or loss for which there is any insurance in effect which covers such loss or which would have covered such loss except for the existence of this Program. B. Euluded Acts -The Program will not pay for liability claims stemming from: 1. damage to or destruction of property caused by the covered person to -~ June 14, 1994 403 __ The Board of Supervisors has authorized the establishment of the Self-Insurance Trustees Committee ("the Trustees"). The Trustees shall provide general oversight to successfully implement the Program. The Risk Manager will administer the Program under the following procedures. A. Reporting of Claims; Written Notice -Upon the happening of any occurrence which may be covered by the Counts insurance, written notice containing the identity of the person seeking coverage or indemnification under this Program, information regarding the time, place, and circumstances of the occurrence, and the names and addresses of (1) all injured persons, (2) the owner of any damaged property and (3) all witnesses whose identities are known or can be reasonably determined shall be given as soon as practicable by the person seeking coverage or indemnification under this Program to the Risk Manager. Any person seeking coverage or indemnification under this Program and who is no longer employed by or otherwise providing service to the County shall also provide the Risk Manager with his or her name, address and work and home telephone numbers and shall further be required to up-date information on how he or she can be contacted by the Risk Manager when necessary. B. Reporting of Claims; Service of Frocess - If a claim is made or an action is brought against coverage or person as a result of any occurrence which may be subject to indemnif cation under the Counts insurance or the Program, that person shall immediately notify the County Attorney in writing and forward to the County Attorney every demand, notice, summons, or other process received by the covered person or his representative. C. Cooperation -All persons seeking indemnification under the Program shall caoperate with the County and, upon the Counts request, assist in making settlements, in the conduct of lawsuits, and in enforcing any right of contribution, subrogation, indemnification, or any other claim which the County or the covered person may have against any other person who may be liable to any covered person. That person shall attend hearings, depositions, trials and other proceedings and shall assist in securing and giving evidence and obtaining the attendance of witnesses. June 14, 1994 4U5 by the Program. H. Subrogation Rights Reserved by the County. 1. If a covered person receives a payment from another source for a loss which is also covered by the Program, the Program has the right to recover from the covered person any amounts paid by the Program which have been paid from another source. 2. A recovery made pursuant to subrogation will be applied to reduce the loss for which the County has made payment or otherwise incurred expenses. I. Purchase of Insurance The Risk Manager shall recommend to the Trustees the purchase of such insurance or participation in group self-insurance pools as may be appropriate to provide coverage or such additional coverages to the extent that loss exposure exceeds the reasonable capacity of the self- insurance fund to afford adequate coverage. The Trustees on behalf of the County may contract, subject to the provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, for insurance, re-insurance or participate in group self-insurance pools. Sec. 2-86. ADMII~IISTRATION OF RISK MANAGEMENT IlV'IEItNAL SERVICE FLrND A. Generally - The Department of Risk Management shall be responsible for administering this Program. B. Claims Procedures -The Department of Risk Management shall administratively handle claims made against the County. The County may contract, subject to the provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, with third parties for the provision of claims services. The Risk Manager shall develop and implement comprehensive claims procedures. C. Claims Adjustment -Authority Level -The Risk Management Department will provide claims administration services through its own staff or through the services of an independent third party claims administration organization. The Risk Management Department will have authority to June 14, 1994 407 and other information necessary for the management of this Program. The accounts and records system shall include development of an appropriate claims reserve procedure. C. Supplemental appropriations -The Board of Supervisors shall appropriate and budget sufficient moneys to assure the solvency of the Self-Insurance Fund and the effective management and operation of the Self-Insurance Program. The Trustees shall, from time-to-time, recommend such additional appropriations or budget amendments as may be required to assure the solvency of the fund. D. Transfer prohibited - No money shall be transferred into or out of the Self- Insurance Fund except as hereby authorized. E. Expenditures -All authorized and approved payments of covered losses under this Program and all premiums for commercial third-party insurance shall be paid from the Self- Insurance Fund. Additionally, all costs and expenses of operating and administering the Fund and the Department of Risk Management shall be paid from the Fund. F. Investment income -All income generated by the investment of the monies in the Self-Insurance Fund shall be added to the Fund. G. Recoveries -Any amounts recovered on a claim, suit or action by any covered individual recovered through subrogation, indemnification, insurance, or otherwise up to the amount of any covered loss for which the Program is liable or which has been covered by the Fund shall be immediately paid into the Fund. H. Loss Prevention -The Risk Management Department will provide loss prevention services through its own staff. The Risk Management Department may also supplement the loss prevention services provided by its staff with the services of an independent loss prevention organization in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. I. Reserves -The Program shall establish financial reserves up to the limit of any retention or any excess policies. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance with the deletion of a sentence June 14, 1994 40~ R-61494-8 Mr. Robertson advised that there are additional funds in the budget for positions in the Sheriff's and Clerk of Circuit Court offices. He also advised there were several changes to the budget since the first reading on May 24, 1994. They include: (1) Increase to the CHIP program of $11,380; (2) Reduction in Center in the Square funding by $10,000 which was reallocated to the Mill Mountain Zoo; and (3) Increase in Recreation Fee Class revenues and expenditures by $18,560. Supervisor Nickens expressed support for full funding of $16,660 for the CHIP program, and an additional $10,000 for Center in the Square for full funding, and that the remaining Capital Reserve be allocated to the Parks & Recreation Department for a capital matching fund program. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance with the following changes: (1) full funding of the CHIP Program, (2) $30,000 funding for Center in the Square with $10,000 to be appropriated from the 1994-95 Board Contingency Fund, (3) remaining funds in Capital Reserve Fund earmarked for Parks & Recreation matching capital fund, and (4) inclusion of the additional revenue and positions from the Compensation Board for Sheriff and Clerk of Circuit Court. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None June 14, 1994 ~~ 1 Adopted FY 1993-94 Revenue EStim~res General Fund: General Government: General Property Taxes Other Local Taxes Permits, Fees & Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Charges for Services Commonwealth Federal Other Total General Government Youth Haven II Law Library Recreation Fee Class Comprehensive Services Internal Services Garage II Total General Fund Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Internal Service Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund School Opezat~,g Fund School Cafeteria Fund School Grants Fund School Textbook Fund School Capital Fund School Bus Fund ~ 49,655,000 15,670,000 490,500 270,000 243,000 5,302,550 1,525,048 1,833,918 74,990,016 354,672 33,800 533,405 0 1,262,388 237,166 77,411,447 8,226,611 75,000 0 8,732,104 3,819,553 68,135,405 2,880,000 2,298,023 693,975 149,517 90,318 Adopted FY 1994-95 S 52,760,000 17,485,000 538,730 487,500 245,000 5,420,303 1,525,048 3,832,066 82,293,647 378,788 42,,980 548,430 874,623 1,356,556 253,766 85,748,790 8,391,277 75;000 1,134,556 10,383,212 4,452,127 71,808,184 2,945,000 1,874,493 695,726 0 0 Total Expenditures All Funds 172,511,953 187,508,365 Less: Transfers (45,403,881) (52,002,342) Total Net of Transfers S 127,108,072 ~ 135,506,023 Jung 14, 1994 413 2. That the preparation and approval of this budget is for informative and fiscal planning purposes only. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the budget with the following changes: (Z) full funding of CHIP Program; (2) $30,000 funding for Center in the Square with $10,000 to be appropriated from the 1994-95 Board Contingency Fund; (3) remaining funds in Capital Reserve earmarked for the Parks & Recreation Matching Capital Fund; and (4) additional revenue and positions from Compensatory Board for Sheriff and Clerk of Circuit Court, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None b. Ordinance Appropriating the Funds for the Fiscal Year 1994195 Budget. 0-61494-9 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance with the changes approved in the resolution adopting the budget. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 61494-9 APPROPRIATING FIINDS FOR THE 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR BIIDGET FOR ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a June 14, 1994 415 Revenues: General Fund: General Government $ 82,293,647 Youth Haven II 378,788 Comprehensive Services 874,623 Law Library 42,980 Recreation Fee Class 548,430 Internal Services 1,356,556 Garage II 253 766 Total General Fund $ 85,748,790 Debt Service Fund $ 8,391,277 Capital Projects Fund $ 75,000 Internal Service Fund -Risk Management $ 1 134,556 Water Fund: Water Operations $ 8,253,988 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 152,387 Water Repair and Replacement 350 000 Gther 863,142 Water Surplus 763,695 Total Water Fund $ 10,383,212 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 3,904,641 Sewer Repair and Replacement 547,486 Total Sewer Fund $ 4,452,127 School Funds: Operating $ 71,808,184 Cafeteria 2,945,000 Grant 1,874,493 Textbook 695,726 Total School Fund $ 77,323,403 Total All Funds $ 187,508,365 ~ ~- June 14, 1994 417 Public Safety Police $ 4,843,871 Transportation Safety Commission 960 E911 Maintenance 339,805 Fire and Rescue 3,819,924 Total Public Safety $ 9004 560 Community Services General Services $ 438,207 Solid Waste 2,931,659 Engineering and Inspections 2,013,468 Building Maintenance 1,158,628 Planning and Zoning 385,426 Planning Commission 20,612 Total Community Services $ 6,948,000 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 1,387,716 Parks and Recreation 1,143,811 Public Health 425,333 Social Services Administration 2,112,035 Public Assistance 952,400 Institutional Care 27,500 Social Service Organizations 119,332 Contributions Human Service Organizations 82,713 Contributions Cultural Organizations 112,735 ~~ 1,317,609 VPI Extension 6~~7 Elections 179,800 Animal Control 196,393 Total Human Services $ 8,125,424 Non-Departmental _ Employee Benefits $ 1,150,861 Miscellaneous 879,640 Internal Service Chazges 1,048,006 Total Non-Departmental $ 3,078,507 ,dune 14, 1994 419 Internal Services Fund -Risk Management $ 1 134 556 > > Water Fund: Water Operations $ 8253 988 ~ 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 152,387 Water Repair and Replacement 350 000 Other 863,142 Water Surplus 763 695 Total Water Fund $ 10,383,212 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 3904 641 Sewer Repair and Replacement ~547~486 Tota! Sewer Fund $ 4,452,127 School Funds: Operating $ 71,808,184 Cafeteria 2,945,000 Grant 1,874,493 Text Book 695,726 Total School Funds $ 77,323,403 Total All Funds $ 187,508,365 June 14, 1994 ~ - ~~, NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Buildinct Code Board of Adjustments and AoUeals Chairman Eddy nominated Richard Evans to serve another four-year term which will expire July 25, 1998. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-61494-10 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 61494-10 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 14, 1994, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - April 26, 1994, May 10, 1994. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the ~;~ June 14, 1994 423 NAYS: None RESOLUTION 61494-10.C REQUESTING APPROVAL AND SUPPORT OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION~B PROJECT 0720-080-281-c-501, COLONIAL AVENUE WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation held a location and design public hearing on May 26, 1994 for the purposes of discussing the proposed improvements to Colonial Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve and support the improvements as proposed to Colonial Avenue and as outlined in Roanoke County's Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 1994-2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Suuervisor Minnix• He advised that he supported Mr. Hodges memo regarding sign violations by area realtors. Mr. Hodge will bring back more information to the Board. Supervisor Nickens• (1) He announced that the ribbon - June 14, 1994 ~~1 Counties meeting in Las Vegas. (2) He attended a meeting of the area planning commissions to discuss proposals to reduce pollution in the Roanoke River. An advisory board with members from each participating government will make suggestions and recommendations. (3) He attended the Virginia Department of Transportation meeting on road improvements to Route 221, and advised that over 200 people attended and were evenly divided over which side of the road to upgrade. (4) He asked Mr. Hodge and Mr. Mahoney if there was any report from the meeting with the Board of Equalization regarding the Strauss Property. Mr. Hodge advised that the Board of Equalization will respond back in two weeks. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Minnix moved to receive and file the following reports. vote. The motion carried by a unanimous voice 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - Mav 1994 5. Fire and Rescue Reaction/Response Times for the Month of April 1994. 6. Report on Drainage Problems on Sierra/Fenwick June 14, 1994 42 accomplishing. He advised that the Mason Cove Rescue Squad has requested a vehicle. Following discussion, there was Board consensus to wait until the Griffith vehicle study is reviewed before making any decision. Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advised that the Ad Hoc Committee will be discussing vehicles at their next meeting. There was concern expressed about the number of calls made to nursing homes for routine care. Mr. Chambliss advised that one of the major topics of the ad hoc committee was response and reaction times for answering calls. Other issues included interaction between the volunteer and career firefighters, and the level of control exercised by the County. In response to a question, Mr. Chambliss reported that the County has received three of the financial audits and all but five indicated they are working toward completion of their audits. He further advised that two fire departments had not applied for 501C3 status. During the 1993/94 budget process, completion of the audit became a requirement for receiving County funds. There was general Board consensus that staff would only forward funding to the individual fire and rescue squads when the audits and 501C3 forms are received. Mr. Hodge responded that this was the approach used with other donations to organization such as Center in the Square. The next work session with the Ad Hoc Committee was set for July 12, 1994. June 14, 1994 429 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $9,808 by Ordinance 52593-8 and further has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman for the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice-chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an inflation factor not to exceed five (5$) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994; the second reading was held on June 14, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of 3.8$ pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $10,181 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice-chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1994. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance with 3.8$ salary increase, and carried by the following recorded - June 14, 1994 431 Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 61494-11 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and _2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Juue ~4, 4994 433 Supervisor Johnson moved to grant 3.8$ salary increases to County Attorney Paul Mahoney and County Administrator Elmer Hodge. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None Supervisor Kohinke requested that bonding leave for adoption be discussed at the June 28, 1994 meeting. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 10:09 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Submitted by, Approved by Mary H. Allen, CMC Lee B. Eddy, Chairman June 28, 1994 435 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 28, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Samuel W. Crews, Coopers Cove Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. June ~8, 1994 437 active in various statewide and national associations, including the American Judges Association, the American Bar Association, the American Judicature Society, the Association of District Court Judges of Virginia and the Virginia Bar Association; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd has served the citizens of the Roanoke Valley in an equitable and just manner, providing fair hearings and decisions to the hundreds of people who have passed through his courtroom; and WHEREAS, Judge Kidd will be retiring from the General District Court on July 15, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its appreciation and gratitude to EDWARD S. KIDD, JR. for his service as Chief Judge of the 23rd Judicial District of Virginia General District Court; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Judge Kidd for a happy, healthy and rewarding retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE2 NEW BIISINESS s Recuest for Suonort for Participation and Fundinq for .. June 28, 1994 439 NAYS: None RESOLIITION 62894-2 E%PRESSING SIIPPORT FOR ROANORE COIINTY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE ROANORE VALLEY REGIONALIZATION GROIIP WHEREAS, in September 1993, elected officials and business leaders met to discuss the regionalization of such services as water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley legislators agreed at that time to introduce legislation that could rebate state income tax on new businesses to local governments for a period of years regardless of the location of the new business, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group determined that a study should be conducted to review the various services provided by each local government and develop a list of those services that should be considered for regionalization, and WHEREAS, the group has requested that the Counties of Roanoke and Botetourt, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Town of Vinton share with the Roanoke Valley business community the cost to implement the study, and WHEREAS, it was also requested that each locality indicate by resolution their support for participation in this study. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Regionalization Group to review and recommend services that should be provided on a regional basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution eliminating references to funding and consultant's name, and June 2s, 1994 441 Mr. Hodge reported that Supervisor Kohinke requested that this issue be reconsidered. He advised that the Leave Policy team recommended that adoption leave, extended maternity leave and paternity leave be reduced from 30 to 20 days. The team also recommended an increase in use of sick leave for family illness. Mr. Hodge recommended that the Board not make any changes to the recommendations of the Leave Policy Team. County employees Janet Scheid, and Anne Marie Green spoke in support of changing the leave back to 30 days, because of the additional time necessary to go through the adoption process and the necessity of bonding with an adoptive child. Supervisor Nickens moved to rescind all action related to leave policy taken on May 24, 1994. Supervisor Johnson moved to amend the motion to rescind the May 24, 1994 policy, and keep all improvements that were included in the policy, and restore adoption leave to pre May 24, 1994 policy which was 30 days. The motion was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke NAYS: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens, Eddy Supervisor Nickens's original motion to rescind all action taken May_24, 1994 was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy The policy remained the same as was recommended by the Leave June zg, X994 ~~~ ~~~ 443 Development. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading for Ordinance #4 and set the second reading and public hearing for July 26, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special IIse Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, IIoon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Extendinc the Franchise of Boothe American Company D/B/A Salem Cable Z'y to Operate a Cable Television System in Roanoke County for a Period of 120 Days. (Joseph obenshain. Senior Assistant Count Attorney) 0-62894-5 There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None a ; ~;.~ June 28, 1994 445 ~~~ ;~ { Virginia, after June 30, 1994, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Salem Cable TV, the franchise of Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on July 1, 1994, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement between Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: 2. 0-62894-6 Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy None Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Necessary Easements to Construct the Hollins Road Water Line Extension. (Gary Robertson, IItility Director) There_ was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: s June 28, 1994 447 Easement 28.13-1-25 Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Easement 28.13-1-25.1 Hardie, James W. & Pamela C. Easement 28.13-1-26 Barton, William R. & Betty L. Easement 28.13-1-27 Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors Easement 28.13-1-27.2 AMP Incorporated Easement 28.13-1-27.3 Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. Easement 28.13-1-28 Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. Easement 28.13-1-29 Nininger, Charles L. & Gladys A. Easement 28.17-1-1 All, Maurice C. & Juanita G. Easement 28.17-1-2 Dogan, Robert H. & Frankie M. Easement 28.17-1-3 Halsey, Henry C. & Peggy Lou Easement 28.17-1-••4 Matthews, Henry M. & Maxine Easement 28.17-1-5 Patterson Memorial (Grace) Easement 28.17-2-9 Wray, Frank T. & Mamie Easement 28.17-2-11 Holdren, Michael S. & Brenda A. Easement 28.17-2-14 Sweet, Ricky L. Easement 28.17-2-10 Turner, Roy T. & Lorene W. Easement 28.17-2-12 Chumbley, James R. & Margaret G. Easement 28.17-2-13 Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement 28.17-2-15 Sweet, Raleigh T. & Francis P. Easement 38.16-1-3.1 Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement 38.16-1-3:2 Dominion Trust Co. & M. E. Hinman Easement 38.16-1-3.3 CBL Plantation Plaza (Food Lion) Easement 38.16-1-3.4 Central Fidelity Bank Easement 38.16-1-3.5 CBL Plantation Plaza, Ltd. June 28, 1994 449 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy 3. Ordinance Declaring a Parcel of Real Estate Identified as Tax Man No. 86.01-2-15 Located off Homewood Circle in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District to be Surplus and Acceptinq;l?~zc=t~-r an Offer for the Sale of Same. (John Willey, Property Manager) 0-62894-7 Mr. Willey advised that Brian D. Wilson has offered to purchase the property for $100 and will remove the well and reservoir. In response to a question, he advised that Mr. Wilson agreed to remove the well and reservoir by a letter dated April 28, 1994. There were no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Eddy moved to a:iopt the ordinance accepting the offer of Brian Wilson for $100 and removal of well and reservoir per letter dated April 28, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 62894-7 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IDENTIFIED AS TAB MAP NO. 86.01-2-15 LOCATED OFF HOMEWOOD CIRCLE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT TO HE SIIRPLIIS AND ACCEPTINC;~L*J4~'^~='iG AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: June 28, 1994 ~~ x 451 ~~ IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Chief T. C. Fuqua, Fire & Rescue, will bring back a recommendation from the Fire & Rescue Chiefs' Board after their meeting on July 13, 1994. 2. Virginia Western Community College Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Stanard Lanford to serve a four- year term which will expire June 30, 1998. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-62894-8 Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 62894-8 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 28, 1994, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building . ~ June 28, 1994 453 Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Recruired Yeas: Supervisors Johnson. Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens Ed~- Nays: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Nickens: He announced that the Grand Opening of Explore Park would be held on June 30 at 10:00 a.m. and recommended arrival by 9:15 to get parking. Supervisor Johnson: He advised that the Audit Committee had their first meeting prior to this Board meeting. Supervisor Kohinke: He reminded everyone that the cat ordinance goes into effect on July 1, and that he and Treasurer Fred Anderson are planning a small ceremony when he gets his cat license. Supervisor Eddv: (1) He announced that there was a news conference at 11:00 a.m. regarding the fly ash cleanup at Dixie Caverns Landfill. (2) He advised that he received a letter from VACo asking for a legislative contact and he suggested that June 2~, X994 455 4. Fire and Rescue Reaction Response Times - Mav 1994 5. Report on 1991 Water Project 6. Report on Sick Leave IIsage 7. Bond Project Status Report IN RE: SCHOOL BOARD ISSIIES 1. Resolution of Appreciation IIpon the Retirement of Dr. Bayes Wilson, Roanoke County school Superintendent. R-62894-9 Chairman Eddy presented Dr. Wilson with the resolution, a gift certificate, and a hand-made flag with the County Seal. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 62894-9 OF APPRECIATION IIPON THE RETIREMENT OF DR. BAYES WILSON, SIIPERINTENDENT OF ROANORE COIINTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, Bayes Elwood Wilson was born in Russell County, Virginia, left high school to join the military, and subsequently completed his schooling, through the doctoral level, while working and raising a family; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson began working with the Roanoke County School System in March, 1956, as a student teacher at Andrew Lewis High School, and has held a variety of positions with the Roanoke County School System, culminating with his appointment as June 28, 1994 457 _... . guidance of the Roanoke County School System, for his service to the citizens of the County and for his continued emphasis, through his own example, of the importance of education; and further BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Dr. Wilson for a happy, productive and healthy retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2. Work Session on School Capital Projects School Board Chairman Frank Thomas introduced School Superintendent Bayes Wilson. Dr. Wilson reviewed information presented at the June 14 Board meeting regarding projects currently funded and under construction; Projects awaiting approval for funding (Category II) which included Cave Spring Junior renovations and William Byrd High School renovations ($3,300,000); and proposed VPSA funded Projects which included roofs, ADA Improvements, Roanoke County Occupational School (RCOS) improvements and site improvements at Glenvar ($1,700,000). Dr. Wilson presented a list of other projects that needed consideration which totalled $1.4 million for Fort Lewis and $14,389,000 for other additions and other renovations. In response to questions from the Board members, Dr. Wilson m~.~. June 28, 1994 459~~~° AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 4. Request to Apply for Inclusion in the Virginia Public School Authority's Fall 1994 Bond Sale. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Directorf R-62894-11 Supervisor Eddy moved to approve $300,000 for roofs, $200,000 for Roanoke County Occupational School (RCOS), and $200,000 for site improvements at Glenvar Schools (Total $700,000). Supervisor Nickens moved to amend the motion to exclude improvements at RCOS (Total $500,000). The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Kohinke, Eddy Supervisor Eddy's amended motion to exclude RCOS was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy RE8OLIITION 62894-11 OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE AIITHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PIIBLIC SCHOOL AIITHORITY AITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF $~#~t~r`4t~~~ SCHOOL BONDS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a June 28, 1994 461 At 5:40 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) To Discuss a legal matter, Enforcement of the Bingo Code (7) To Discuss a legal matter regarding the Regional Sewage Treatment Plant Agreement. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECIITIVE SESSION R-62894-12 At 7:05 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minn~.x, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 62894-12 CERTIFYING EgECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. June 28, 1994 463 that the Board appropriate $1.5 million toward the cleanup... Ms. Hyatt advised that because of the large dollar amount, it was necessary to hold a public hearing. She also requested that the Board waive second reading of the ordinance because of the emergency status of the issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 62894-13 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 BtTDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE, BY THE APPROPRIATION OF AN AMOIINT NOT TO EBCEED $1,500,000 FROM THE GENERAL FIIND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOIIRCES FOR THE PIIRPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIBIE CAVERNS LANDFILL WHEREAS, environmental remediation expenses at Dixie Caverns landfill exceed currently appropriated and available funds, and it is necessary to amend the adopted Fiscal Year 1993-1994 budget and appropriation ordinance to provide additional expenditures for these purposes; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-162.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, requires publication of notice and a public hearing if an amendment to the budget of a local government to increase the aggregate amount appropriated exceeds one percent of the total revenue in the budget or $500,000, whichever is lesser; and WHEREAS, notice of this proposed amendment was published as June 28, 1994 465 .. _ ~. environmental remediation at the Dixie Caverns Landfill from the. proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such costs if $1,500,000. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Ordinance Amending and Reenactina_Section 21-3, IIt Service Tax, of the Roanoke County Code by Providinc for the Imposition of the Consumer IItility Tag on Cellular Telephones. (Paul M. Mahonev, County Attornevf 0-62894-14 Mr. Mahoney reported that staff is still trying to get a better estimate of the revenue that will be generated from this utility tax. The cellular companies are in the process of determining which customers would be affected. There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None June 28, 1994 467 apply to that part of the charge in excess of fifteen dollars ($15.00) per month made by any seller of any utility service to any purchaser thereof who uses such utility service in private homes or residential units; provided, further, that any commercial or industrial user shall pay the hereinabove set out twelve (12) percent on the first five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) of utility service. ,~:r•:::>::.::.: ::>:«:>:<;:<:>! ": .rr,.}:{.}rl:::.:~ <.:~},.rrr}rrrr};:.:'.,:,.<{?{.:~..r'•.}r}r;::... {a~) ~~er~ ~s..:N~:iereby::r:~n~s:~d~v»a??~.»rrev~.:,:,~~~,N~.;: }:.}}>.} ;r,'<' . ........ ... ........ ....... :::::::::::: :•: .:: .: •...::: ::.. ... .:~•:.v....... ~:?ti;:;%;:;:?;;.:4}:?};:::!:: i} :•r}i:<•rFN..y ...v.•r'f'?<Mr/rf ASir.•}:": rr,::: ~p~~t~ u ~~<:each aid:»:ev~ ::. ~zr~haser . a~ ~Q~si~i~:~::>::;c~~::::m~~~l~;r~ ': tea.: n...I:?~•r.:v3v: m::.v:i:.?•.w:::»...:: nw::::::: :..::::: r::.vmn+yv! ii}ir}yiiiiri•:4Gr • • • ••~ '::: •: 'l' 'f..:..f:+Y:i: ~iiiv'i::iiiiYiiiiiiiiiiiiG'i%:%% % %flN • • • .{$:$G~iV//J%i5 :!::~:<~'!{{}:{~:yCJi}p}}}}:{~^}}}: "• '.}f.•}?{??•'f..{?:•r:•rv::vv::~v:-. ~:::rv.:.v: nv::::: nv:. •~:~: ::. :: ..' " ti%i:.......: ......'1;%'i:i:;i::: ;;i:, .....~..:..::.: {:: :r. r.::r ': {!lf:::. :j:'{j'ii:::..yv:::::•:..4}M::%l/J.•,?.!~l.~N~.. '.. .: .. ff.•'~P te.e~c~mmcvii~at~.ons:<:>::serv~:~ces::»' xa~i~ed...~ ... a ~itobi:i~:::::>:sv~~..: ~~br :: :: ~ ..< .•... .... ...... .:....: .i: .;............iii:...: }}}.....: ..:. .:. '?.;.;y. ::??•}iii:{:}:' ::. :{:. ij•':::,::•:v:•;^;~.:,..i::::..................F.................... .:i?%iii;:;:«;!?:?;m%;:?•r !: .. a«>~ ::>:reta~~rs of :>:c~1:lular ~ele .h~~~::>:se~::~xce::>a:>:<tax...:iii...~ :..'~~"'"" ....,.....~ ~ ...............::::::::.::::::::::.::::::..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::...:.. ~..~,~?a~o :::..~.:{.}}:..:{:>::}::.:.~::r<:..::::...:::::::::r<:::::::»~::>ii}i:r:.iir:}r;:rrr:::}}}}i}:::}}:i>}>}:?.}:}:.>:}:>}}}...:,::.::::::~ ...::::......M,~..:r,.:N,::~.}}~.:.::.:~.::~.:N:::rrh,.:, ..: •}rrr x':;:;;%<;;:?;:;;;r:<;:;;:<,:l?r'•:y;f?.}'{?{{<..}:•r.:i•}ii l~:..{::~}}x:: {•a>}i}}::r~ :}n},x.,,;,y,. •,..,,r...}}»i; }.m»rllllm• ..r/,.•i:;:..: ~ :C:{•;::• is .: .'i. ::::i :::: .. ~ .. ... ::: ..: ... .}}}}:!:.i'.3:y{:~}.}'.:ti:+T%:}:p:j!r:....:v..:. .. .. ..., ;..:...I?Yf./......v...:fMl.,+~.~.~{{»'{}}Y,.;:!i~:!.?};f::Y,r%WY/Y{l ... :: . ~s~>r:::>:tin::>::>::{}~:~f~:~:::>::»::; erce~.t>:::>:;~~ ~....~a©~i~~~:.:><:<:::>..~:~s:~<:...~ . ~ :r ' • :.r' ' ma ~.r v:::..::~N:::n ...... ..... :n u:»::iii:4}iii}ii:4:•if ••••...• w:ivi:•Y:ivil iri:.:::::'r".: i.'•'iL}Wi, v%.?}~6'%x:GiGi/A'p4MW'r,(9%rij::: :ii'ln'ti>%iiYlr::4Vl.<43iGViSXlgJO ..~ ':::::+/<r:{.:::?Ti}yX4}%:~$.tiiji:^}'•%i:!}rr% 'f.?•h\4ir:}r1/::vr:4%^".}}is4r4:}'{•;:i•}}:r.,vv.•i.W,."M.:,:v,.,v,W:%,?•:<Hfl/M.h:Y+C}K+JJ£l Y}Y4'. {?.:4.•l flf ~~"2er:;<:>:::a a~nst>::>::;~ :::<;::....; . : ; :::::.; :::::. ~:.<::< ::::::....... '~ :.::.H.. <:~•x^~???i:s.;.r,.;..:,...?~c;! : ; ,.:' ..~ . .:::%':.,,r;.'}:~i}:•.:.}x.:r.,.::>:}}}}rw;:;::.,:;rr,>}'.}:wl:w::ara,}rl.:...,.:.~a~.:,::::.:wrsr:l.... .:::::: .:.: .. w.{ftw~6~.uw%s.•,Gio:;:.;•:%:ricriG::bi~::'w:3caC46zu6G',.., ,~ :..;. w!?}x?,Grw:_>x,.x?..!?r.:,?!~!,~t;sv:;:r,.•;%;rifyii{n::{w}w:rlr,::?ar;:r,.;}:!';:;}>~}a;rl.;.•,•.;?i~„{'?~;}"::)v •::;rm%::.:;utrilr:rr{~::: ..rr(}rlax!.rs.•r.::?f•:.?•»rx. '.~~~.~-'~~'.~..~~'::~c~a~~zea~~:ons.. erSri.~~ t~~:i`~~i::...:~. .;:::>::: ;:;:;<:>:..':.......};}..}.......,~"~>< .,:.' P~ .:...,::... .:}:: . : .::..::::.:.::..:::::: aac..........~°u ..:ems ":: «:~as..:~: ~°~°..~. :•::xHMi}::v.•}:isY:w%.•^•wri%rf~vi}riii.•}is4:ivYr::Ylir%llJi}irrir:i}%iririiiiii::nGr:vili.::': ~k iiiil:::{N.rMfirl/::~r:MAFii+%%!:'i%ll7li'i: v: w::.. ~•: •:•••••••: •,.. ;`•:.. .. '~'':'•~ ua~yyo< ....:; ..'{:r.«:x.p:?•»r,:??err.yrr.;«•fn:r«<?.:.,•.;•;cr.!?:p::rwrrrrnf,u<ooa,c!- .....:.:.........................::... ,..:. cs~~....or ~cans~ame~ a~...~~~~~ :..::N..:..u ~.:::n:..,,.,:,.:w .............. >... :...:.,..:•::::•.•}:};:;r:;;iir:i;}}rr::sr:rw«w:x::: .v.cun}r::vw:'ci~aiio:iawlriv%vav::rlnccurlivawfirwliiill%Sc6c .. .. ::;:?;m%oon~our,:a%ti%s ~ .:...:: rxlir.?:<,..-.;v{{?:•i:•iiv..i v:}: r..,;:'{y r~.•r. {..}.r::::::,:..::.:.x. r:::.:, r:::: !«.r.•: rrF..?:::rr.<•r..•yrr.<.:r~.::-:.:... :. ~ 't:..' {..:. '{{:::}: ..:.. .:.:.'. :. .:....:::;: ...: .: .....::. .:....; ...: :.:::..:ii:;•::• ::•.•rr::"^.; •.^' ...............: ::....:,.: .:...:::: :.. vr.;;.tt?%::M/•^}r {:. fry?.v,<::ef,.:rv'rl; F:4t!?: / .?%.. .. Po9. bar}:~a.ic~.>:~~ the }~urc~fzase~ or ~onsumerw<:~c~: ~.~~ ~e.~~~r f~s~ ~~~ >::.•rw'%:..{sa::•:::t:tv'•^a~ir..,6.v...,.~.•:....~r{•r. :.::.rf,:::.. ::,::::r .•:..:::.::::::.,~::.•:...wl.~.:Mn.,..w.:.:.::.~.i.~.::rixriiiu`d.•::cwaw;Hw6~.:.+en::isr,vlr.Vw}w}r:xrrfa..:}xiGY/ilf6dC1~L~'6J~t0R }'•}y w:::::::n•. )}r;;{f„r.: /ff.•%ri4}.:{•J.~•:MY{J/ r '%/ff,1•.?:;M?: f;::'•% ~:f:<eti{.: 1.?'<?: •:??•rrrf?J/I•'<:+<: /f!!,/: }i'r,.•rF,.: f.<: fr.!~i ?•:ti?•}i4AY1':C•fiVl J'f }:H}}':ArrlR:^Y }T•?.:lx/ t ..c~~. r;}:??.~.t~:<...~~i~r:<.:<.tn~::;::>t~a.t:<;:>~:::>::::: ~~ ' .::>::;':. :n»wsw,}>:}xim}}}i,:cww..}WA:~.r...,.~;,}rllA},lA:w}W.H}}rt.}i}};i}ii}::nr}}i}ii:.:W:. r......... ...., .... wrk, l~wanoAV~ccn .::.'. .:::.....:..::::~,:'.'..~"~~~o~e......c~u~::.<:.>:.:or:r.}}}:.a:.:a)a3~::....::~tn;er»>'>~~"'.} '.. :.rIHTVvi7w+i.•w•WivwR.N%SikVwii'i":i:.vi.LY4i?•]w%f/iGl%%~::: f::::y::•M:ri.. i'::% ::::.i'lrriW:••::•~:4k:>NF+C4::J:ii>kJ>ii%NA4rYAWX/P4$W :f~$'llr}}:iWi%i6i::WFYYA!}:i::• ~..:::gpy?{gr: wMlP•~?M%H..4lrNMlr::y.•.v,•MS:IX?!•.yr11/r:{:.:::.;{{ti?<{e<:r:.v:::: rr: ' f:?::::... n, •{::/.ti•e<{•:K4: . :.:... .......:::t .............. ..::::::::v: ..: .:: • vx. ~/% .~s~s~• ....::::..... ... ~4%:$$~ler»rm!m„(¢{!,<;;r,; ;'~~~i"(_.f~~~:..... .~. ''pP~",`~a"".;".u':°;`:~'fl~vP~.,.:'q~•'..'.°.: ,'• •• 'd.~i..$~....3Q7.:;{.,.~.'.~II3S'E23Ck$~'E:a:~XE~:»~: j ::z• ..:~%~~;:i;:Yri;'cin:~%;%.ac~:Srr:':iwrx??•:}}:?~}}}fi::%isr:'!{%,R'£•:%.:•rr:}}s~+;,•:::..f:::kac/i::k:::t'c:•1,st+;::%;;K.:'6iru:iwr3ii3iGir}'Q~~''""' •~`.r,Sy$'~3~i'%,~„1~F~„~i„(', ~,~~li~}+fGd6' .: ~56 ::::: r,,r.:.:{wr,.m......"{xarr:'{vn. •. •ryc:{.;y:q/ rryxcrrr%{~::a. +•r,.rr>xr'{•:•:ow "•: ,.afr.<?:.~~i {x{?{fr,.!rY { % .rxcu.¢:•r.. ~o~ o ..: ~ ~pi~j~q~p }...:. ;%4G''•''"~~" ''~%'ii` xACYA:FN%//NN}iiiWi r~-WihSWrHY}}:mrw.WA~Fi.Wnr}Y+idiif~}:-0%%C+Jllr/.C{%'• .•••; •• •• .{{~j~~~M+ •,?f~t •• ~ ' f {{lf,.x<Yff;ff YfM,.{{•::{<{{<j?:'f,.k4%r////,.H,Yr f~rr:<<;:{:f~ff4{{;Y,:{rx:}':.u:?iyr };::~•i.<:%:.:H.{:HIhY,.rn-•'ry::¢rmryhrw%r fe{f?:4: vprr f' 9YfiK<«{<r Yffrffr ~~. ~~r e...:xn: ~~cces~ cif ..... '..:. ?{{{,: }.... }} ;..:.....}r{....:.:. %%~, 4. ' 9PO . . . .n:...a:i:~•.ww .... ,:~sawt}„~.rlrrf%vw•l:}:«.}r;.rr:;:::;;iir%::R~%:rrx ra«wi~ir}}rrri a%lKi ::r%w9i'ivlrYaf%liras ': • ...... ~ is .. , . .. .. p :•:?' .~<{'7r..: ...• /:..:...,:ft}:.:~{.',,:i:ti:yi:?`:i:;{fC;:. "ry.;Sr!;!' n:!.j0:•H r:. :. :.... .. n :{.. {. ;<a{{r a{{,n.!.a<tc!ra:vr,?q??roDoo~~yo:n{•c- ..: ' ;ycoc<;,.ac!ri:.;..,<+y:.{,OPP?~P..... . oPP' o F . . Vii: ' ~ :~~: ~ .; k ~..~..~'".:'~ ~~:~~r>~'sa3c~:>::>: :. ,<:: < '::::>;: ..:.: <:::;;>:..: ;..: :.. .r..• ...... ::::::..w..~ , •:v ~'isiW'+.:4iGJLM::k{:il%ii:1:Y%ll/••••. •: ••:;•fiii l:}rY.•:::•}:•}}i:}:?G:•:{•:4:J:•iiiY%rr::v:ri.{:li:}rii'rri%rllrl/rii/1:iU}%{{ryylNlf.4]iii%xff%.v'%iYiit%I ~ivii:::tiv+iiii~{:Fk:4iF41.•l%,LS i'f%/%/%((~'' ::;?. _ •'.r r:;::;;r%!: :• {':F"~3.:orn;,ar{%;:<:,,r%r~ru:;Y{;::<;rr::r%:;<%!'•:is~:i::iS:::?%:;?:%::rr:::;:;yr.rrrrrrrFau{.xy:rrrlrrrrrnw..}},..•.~: ....: ....moo ~. ser~zee ~~.r~~aser or e~nsum~n~>'er:..:..,. ..}:.rr:...... :::: :::.,:..:::::.•..:.v ::..:.... :ll.........:: %ff:::::: ,Nyyy::%i:f:w;~rv;:kh;ii•;;:%:ar +• ........... .. •..~y.~. f.s.r........ ... }>r ..r<v.«marri rrr:+..x.•{rv{qr.+r:{aria.;v'cr:v;t»}r•::x•<?••:~:arr++i:«rf;: :firrr{rrnwa}rj ~a~'w~~7k:t:~:~' ' f.;:{r :::............ .. "':!M:} ' o°•°•r'r,."` . :x{oo::<xr,.:,. :. ..;.. ... :{{:}:.. ..,... . .. ... •. • r . •"'• .,•.:,, :.•::....:::.:..:..::....::::...:.~,.?.,.:.,:nw,~•.vrfrnw.,orl:rva>'ri%%ii!%%isi%~;:.;'•;i%a„wss~::~ii.~%.iwna»Yc•• •.. ... :i::i}}hY }TY.•;w'isv/N.,.R?%^%Y{r,.;.!iFI,.;:!?,::}Y,:!!y}S•rfrrr%r11/.:i}Y{??M:f1/ff!~:~~.~:;:;i::?;:{~•{i:: i:;.Y.::!~f{{, .!!!,M,.ry :}Yff.9CT :r C)'~:~5 $~ , i'JJr CirQl'7S~•X." .~~' :; ..;;:;'<•:%!{r:%:.r%{{<::nrri,:,•{co.:ni;roygt~ . ~.••, ,.frr's~.;~.^??a! ... ri?;..... .:i ................:::...............1.:{.:sup:>~:>~::~,Qrv'::~~}::~;~ ~~ ..,. :,....•,:?uwllrinu.•}>}}}}xow::.??•x,•rr:•}:?•}},}%::?l.:•;:a}•.,air?{u:xw%~:%;:7t::%r:;',icwilarlisus.~ic•/%r~•~%co6riaalwlvrrv.' .. .:Y;:Lw1:R'raocciaid&bif%d1o'o' June 28, 1994 469 Increase in Base Charges of 14.5 for Fiscal Year 1994- 1995, an Increase in Base. Charges of 25$ for Fiscal Year 1995-1996, an Increase in the Connection Fee to $1500.00, and to Provide for Certain Transition Provisions to Implement same. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 0-62894-15 There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ORDINANCE 62894-15 ANfENDING AND REEI~IACTII~TG SECTION 18-168 'SCI~DULE OF CHARGES' OF CHAPTER 18 'SEVITERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL' OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCRF.AS".: IN BASE CHARGES OF 14S% FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995, AN INCREASE IN BASE CHARGES OF 25% FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996, AN INCREASE IN THE CONNECTION FEE TO $1500.00, AND TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN TRANSITION PROVISIONS TO IlViPLE1NiFNT SAME WI-~REAS, the water and sewer operations of Roanoke County are maintained as separate enterprise operations, so that the expenses of the sewer fund are paid from the revenues and fees chazged to the users of the sewer system; and, WHEREAS, immediate sewer capital needs over the next two fiscal years of approximately $2,500,000 have been identified; and, WHEREAS, the Counts share of the joint sewage treatment plant expansion to be designed and constructed over the next three years is estimated to be approximately $13,000,000; and, WHEREAS, the Boazd of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has determined that an increase in sewer rates and chazges is necessary to fund these necessary capital improvement projects; ,. ~ June 28, 1994 _ [ 471__ ;~d~ ~oni~eenon fees:, The total sewer. canneet;on;. fee, s~a~i cu~s~ of casts ~d cn~si .~..de~ t~~`~~. ..H ..... assncaate wi ~F~ a basic connerL~dn fee,;{u'J an off site facditie~>:feeF:::and ~~. aq. ~~`.s~~and>~~d .: ._ :... ~ .::: .::::::: LiC:;•: .. .. ,.... ::<.. .: ;....., •.+/J.+f.S}YNf/.HANNA tigcrec~t~~~cy ... ,::: .. .: :.::,.,.,,,.,.,H.:.::. (~) .:.Basic coi~nectioR fee: The bask coinectio~ fee fa~a#~`app~ieancs is ti~,re~au~t~#e cast o~ the service eani~ect~an ar se~ce tap The basic co~necixan~ fee s~a~~ 'be assessed a ~~Lui :. :.:. :.... ...: ::.. :. :. ::f/i A/ /::!.. rffAJiffi. ad the. payruent shall 'accorn~any the applicatzon for eaiulecC~Qri tt~ ~3xe s~sar~r system:} 1~ ~~ siL2 ;~dC2lILIfS ~~2 ::::., ,.::::.::;;:. :.,,... ,..,,H. t ~ ......: .. TiiQ of~site #`ac~~ties:;f?~~oT>`~~>a':''licani;~<i~>~trr".: .... '~..::,: f~ a e i~d ~~ crec'~t pa~c~!`> ~redt~ >~?e~allatsre~€'~a ..:::.:<: :':: . : ....... ........ ... ::!Hi•Yi:ii:HL!?is{.:{.:i.:r:•::{.i:[:v..Y.i.'~!i ::•,N ~ fM: ': ~ v~~= June 28, 1994 473 ~~~e t~Ze ~t ra : d~s~oz~urz~e ~efvs:~e ar~d ~emov~ all: oaf its facili~~s~>re ~ , .:.:...:...::<::.:::.;, :.,":.: ' . amount':of the ~©~e~r~.c~tt fees ~revazi~ag ax max Vie, ~s.~f:sersn~e:~as~~:~~ex;bee~ ~te~ie~ '~;~~ fi ~:;:,:,::;: 'the board bf supez~~~rs may b~ resol~:t~sn i~ ~ pox.oxi~:se>:;ae:.xr~*:~r~ fe~s;.~Eor;se~ver.~ae~xries uYStati~cl~n~~c::f~der~starke'.ded sewer> .::: ::: .::: ..: :: ....: ..:::::........, .. . .:......:.;:::.::.::::. ~ :.:. ~ ::::.: v:: ,.. ~. ~,.., ~s ~ra~c~e~ shalt ire xad~.ear~ asc~±fixty ~nancia~ g~ atiori:;ti~~e<;~e::<r ~~~: ......... ......... ......... ......:...:.... ~ P....~....... ~~........ 'i're ~oardo~ sup~ors rnalrfr.r~solgt~aat zthor~x~ ~ ox::~:goon ~?~~.> s feed mes ~'ee to be paid firoxnr the ~en~cat ~. for rba~se ~dnem~cci~arcTia~<i~~xre`~>?~`:""`"~ 1 ~:~4i~h ':.L.t1~..~3I{LL ..: :' :. •... ^:.}::; v:::v:: .:'•. ....; .~::::tiia.. :.:.... v:: r:i::...:: :i...:i: `:: i•.y::::: ..: is ~::i .i:::. •{{:{j:v::::.:ii:: i:'LC^+F$:;:mMl7 f/.4riT: F';::• :;;::..:::::::..;:::»;;:.:.::::,:..~:,©~.;s~gerv~s•©~s._detezrs~~;';wa~ be ux xhe ~esr intere~::~,f:~i.~ ~ocu~:. s' ~ontmti~ d~vetopmenr~ and which wo~ct generate sgt~rif~~rt ert~,ptoynzent if ......... ~ :nnura cap c . ot~ ee •'fkse ttttncxntwsca~~lxor~ fey for °"' ;coici~eckioa?>~'#i ~ ~"'"~ Ebc~oconn~ctza~. f~~~<'e rotes coz~xe~ion.fe~ ~ rb.~.<:~o :>: ' :: .::.. Po . ..................,. ..............................~:~: ,;cc:rte~f~%~~~. ~~t;,i~.;~a~ed upoxs saver sez~re to one~cgu~v~texzr t~~xtt~a~<~A~Ctx~u. ~r :~>;> :>....~u~> f~czi~ie~ f~~.;~~a"~r~h.> deren~aaned by ~'t.C,, iype ~f s.~rvxce ~d e#~ectt~'e da~~'~~~~<s>iz~~Z~aired:u~'"~'i„`<°~~: .: .. ~ es ~ /~~j~~~~ ...........................:::::::..w:.~; :w:::::: .........:: iiiiiii:i'rrri::: is iiii%.ii'f.~+j/N!/.:4xx~:3 B~:s~ rrsect%9r~~'e '~<<b~sse Go~rte~.cam>::~e~:::ts<>:~~#?E?t and uad~des ~.c~a~sa~cc:::o......:: .: xso~a~ae~ i~ ' f%': ......... .........::::::::::::::.:~:::::..:...:... ..:.:.... ...;;:;::::h:.:~:~::.::.r:s:,;.:u ~~ ........::. ,..:: ............::::..: m::::: ~vv: ~.....::: p:A ~a~.~lx the .sa~ez~ ma:u after e~a~arion ~~ ~be,~An~er ~? s~c~N ,.{J! :::.:. •' r. .... •: :: • ... :.... t...... frM}!. :::i;•: ..... : :.. x. ~ ~.~ ~ ~: y.}yy jj}} r+A/y~~ ..... .OC?i:::>:rr•;iYi;4%i,%in,:ri::iyif::iSlf f::{:i:$<,:j>:::±r.;{::; :.;:;:j;.r June 28, ~99~ 475 .................... ~rr~rease to $2~~"t~t~ effective Sep~exnber:1,1~9 ~ix~......... ~or..sznge...fam~i}r. tots off' t~co~~ arc x~ah~ch xca~e~n~r;~ve ~~~>~ezez~#~a~=. .. ................::... ...: .....:. .. . , , , , . v . , ::. .................... ~~tstzn~ fee h~ tees paid bef©re'~.~ ~;ff~ct~~re ~ax~.:pf ~zis. ~rduYan~te~~>the~er<a:::::t~:.:;<:;;:::..«: ;,..:_swkv,,.. ...............................................................::..::...:..::::::::::.. ~::::::.::.:::::::::..::::.:~:: pp:.;;~ ta~<ry~~ seven -fxc~e::.. ~ ..., :::. ,.. _: .: ::... t"f5~ ercerct.o~' the:>rerst .. ;..>.:.,: ;::<:<::<;..;..:::».::~;:: <:;;:::::.;:::<.:::;:;;::,<.;:..:..:.,;...>....... ~::.. .:::~?u~l~:;$~t3t~~3~3 coruleon fee ©~o~::before. ~u ~:~~~':~.:.~~f pent>~,o#' the xema~der a~_rzot exude ozc or ~efure ,Atxgusc 3~., lax ttz~rt t~ze xerna:ixcw~ fs~<'~~s v::..Y/iNx~.wH: c~fferenee beiween the arnaitnt prev~cot3siy ;paid and tyre fey sn e~e~~`a~a~;tiziie ~~z~....... ~wtxers/app~ccant~ that have fclec~ a pxe~wrtar~ acre plan ar ~ubcti~,sio grid :~iave atti . , .....::..:. - :. p :: ~venty-frv~ ~ZS~) percent>of thy. e~usfzng f~e..a<oz~~n~ .#~u~usl/ ~~, '~~<s>~" se~reztty five (7'5~a).percent of the remaining $5f~ 0~a fee: on ox bef~xe August ~~_: ~~~5 'Ih~ir~rkte ........ ......... ......... ..... ........:.:.,: ri:.,,:::,.~:;,~,r;,, tetxta~zng fee shall be the z~~erezcee ~aetween the amount'~Zxe~ously ,p~`~i`ad .rise fee ux eat ......... ......... ......... ........ ..::..... ......:.: ............;::..,.v:..v.,,,;,,,~,:~;;.. tune: ttv~........ ~ersfappt~cants thax ham ~-a. P~~~' s~e.~ian ~r ~~b~vt~€~"z%"" ~.ai ~r after Sep~~mtil° I954 sh~l pad tw fftre :55~~:; ex~e~.t ~f the::~oruxec~€or>~~ ~:> ~'~~ ~. ~ ~.• ~: tune and;.'they<reztiau~rrs~seyenry~ five C~~~6~ ~excenr of the ~~,~t?t~ fee ~efc~e..Pcxt :::~~~~~~ , . ~:~; ..: tli~ xem>. fee shad be she dxfference'~etwe... : >;:...:::<.:;;:..;::;:<:<>.:::..:.:::;:..~::;:::::.. ;:::..>~;.;:;::.:>:>:::~«<„f::,,~,,,.;, ..........:..:: :.::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::;;::.: ........ _:;:.....::::::;:,»,er~;;th~.,~tnaunt pxe~a~sly:;~~~:~:ar,~:::i~ist;Fe~::tr~:e~e~::~ .......................................n........::::::::::::::::::::::: u:::::x :w::.vn4.v. iiGiNJiOfgGSi.%O tha~t~:tinteR ...................... {~} ~ The provision of this Ordinance bier-S~a~13-~9 and the rates established hereby shall be effective from and after du13~~.~,.;e ~°<~ ~g~tq~, On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.34 Acres from R-3 to C-1 to Operate a Training and Develoement Office, Located June 28, 1994 ~~~ WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.34 acres, as described herein, and located at 5670 Starkey Road, (Tax Map Number 87.19-3-38, 39) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Maureen E. Poplstein. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Starkey Road, Va. Route 119, said point being 304.4 feet north of the southerly side of a 30-foot road; thence with the easterly side of Route 119, N. 24 deg. 19' E. 151.0 feet to a point; thence N. 27 deg. 19' E. 39.0 feet to a point; thence leaving Route No. 119 and with the line of the property of the Central Baptist Church of Starkey, Virginia, S. 68 deg. 12' E. 902.0 feet to a point on the line of Lot 15; thence with the line of Lot 15, S. 24 deg. 05' W. 210.0 feet to a point on the line between Lots 12 and 13; thence with the line of Lot 15, N. 65 deg. 55' W. 500.0 feet to the place of Beginning, and being all of Lot 12 and a part of Lot 11, Section 3, Map of Southern Pines, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book 2, page 136. .. . _ June 28, 1994 479 EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SECTION 1, LARELAND FARMS WHEREAS, by Deed dated March 1, 1977, Ezera E. Wertz and Elsie M. Wertz conveyed to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor in title to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia), a sewer line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across a tract of land owned by the Wertz's, in connection with the sewer system designated as "Interceptor from Nottingham Hills to Castle Rock West, Section 1"; and, WHEREAS, Lakeland Developers, Inc., subsequently subdivided and developed a portion of said tract of land into Section 1, Lakeland Farms, as shown upon the plat dated November 17, 1977, made by T.P. Parker & Son, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123; and, WHEREAS, the above-described 20' sewer easement is referenced, but incorrectly shown upon the subdivision plat as an "existing 15' san. sew. esmt."; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the northern June 28, 1994 4S1 4. That, in exchange, acquisition. and acceptance of an additional 2.5 feet for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20') be, and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 5. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Shelton Parker Spencer, II, and Linda Taylor Spencer, or their successors or assigns; and, 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 5. Ordinance Amending the Roanoke County Code by the Enactment of sec. 4-4. Definitions. Sec. 4-5. Recirculation s stem sec. 4-6 Water Treatment Sec. 4-7 Water Supply Systems. Sec. 4-8 SeNace June 28, 1994 483 regulations to require the daily posting of water quality test results at swimming pools and other water recreational facilities operated for public use, and said Board has submitted such regulations for public hearing and comment as a precondition for its adoption of those regulations; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2826, adopted effective April 14, 1981, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors deleted the entire Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools," of the Roanoke County Code upon the understanding that their previous adoption of the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code superseded the county code provisions dealing with construction of swimming pools; and WHEREAS, the mentioned Chapter 18, "Swimming Pools" also contained Article III. "Operations" provided standards for operation of swimming pools and criteria for their inspection; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public health and safety of the citizens of the County of Roanoke, Virginia to continue annual inspections of swimming pools by the Roanoke County Health Department; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 24, 1994; a public hearing and second reading was held on June 28, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: June 28, 1994 485 ~'' 4 or recreational bathing, and having a water depth of 24 inches or more at any point. A spa or hot tub regulated under Article VI "Spas and Hot Tubs" of this Chapter shall be excluded. Public swimming pool: Shall mean any swimming pool, other than a private residential swimming pool, intended to be used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and operated by any person, whether as owner, lessee, operator or concessionaire, regardless of whether a fee is charged for such use. The term "public swimming pool" includes, but is not limited to, tourist establishment pools, pools owned or operated by condominium, private club or association of persons, apartment, or any association of persons. The term "public swimming pool" shall not include single occupant tubs and showers used exclusively for therapeutic purposes. Sec. 4-5. Recirculation Systems. (a) All equipment shall be maintained in satisfactory operating condition during the operation of a swimming pool. (b) The filtration system of all swimming pools shall have sufficient clarifying capacity so as to permit the main drain to be clearly visible from the pool deck at distances up to 10 feet in a horizontal direction from the projection of the drain on the pool surface. (c) All filters on swimming pools shall be designed and installed so as to provide easy accessibility for backwashing, operation, maintenance, and servicing. June 28, 1994 487 chemicals is prohibited except as provided in §4.9(a), (3) & (4). (c) Chemicals other than chlorine, bromine, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, muriatic acid, lime, soda ash, sodium bicarbonate, aluminum sulfate, calcium chloride, cyanuric acid and sodium bisulfate shall not be used to treat pool water without permission from the Health Director. (d) Chemical water quality standards for swimming pools and wading pools: (1) Free chlorine, combined chlorine, bromine and pH values shall be continuously maintained within the following ranges: Minimum Ideal Maximum Free chlorine residual parts per million (ppm) 1.0 1.0-1.5 3.0 Combined chlorine (ppm) None None 0.2* Bromine (ppm) 2.0 2.0-4.0 4.0 P$ 7.2 7.4-7.6 7.8 *Remedial action shall be taken by the operator if combined chlorine exceeds 0.2 ppm as it will result in reduced chlorine efficacy and increase swimmer irritation. a. If pool water disinfectants other than those above are used, residuals of equivalent disinfecting strength shall be maintained. b. If chlorinated cyanurates are used as pool water disinfectants, the cyanuric acid levels shall be maintained within the following ranges: Minimum Ideal Maximum cyanuric Acid (ppm) 30 40-50 60 June 28, 1994 489 lavatories shall provide an adequate and safe sewerage system. (b) Sewage and waste water shall be disposed of into a public sewerage system or by a sewage system constructed and operated in accordance with applicable law and regulations. (c) No untreated or partially treated sewage, liquid waste, or septic tank effluent shall be discharged directly or indirectly onto the surface of the ground or into the public waters. Sec. 4-9. General Safety Provisions. (a) All chemicals, cleaning compounds and similar materials shall be stored in a cool, dry, and well ventilated place, out of reach from children and preferably in a locked room. All chemicals used in pool water treatment shall be stored in their original containers. (1) There shall be no smoking in any areas where pool chemicals are stored. (2) All persons while handling pool chemicals which may be strongly acidic or basic, or which may be strong oxidizing agents, shall wear protective eyewear and other protective clothing as deemed necessary by the Health Director. (3) No harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form shall be added manually and directly to any pool water except under emergency conditions. (4) Whenever it is necessary to add any harsh or irritating chemical in concentrated form directly into the water of any pool, use of the pool shall be stopped until such time as the chemical is dissolved completely in and is diffused thoroughly throughout the pool water. (5) All persons before handling pool chemicals shall read thoroughly the manufacturer's recommendations June 28, 1994 491 ,. (c) Operators shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a pool operator as recommended by the National Swimming Pool Foundation or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. Lifeguards shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a lifeguard as recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association, the American Red Cross or other accredited agency recognized by the Health Director. (d) A bound log shall be maintained by the swimming pool operator on the premises which shall contain the time and dates of the chemical test performed, results of those tests and initials of the persons who performed the necessary testing. The log shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months. 1. The log shall include the following at the specified intervals: a. all chemicals added, including quantity and time added - as needed; b. personnel and changes in personnel - as necessary; c. injuries - as necessary; d. maintenance operations including backwashing and vacuuming - as necessary; e. disinfectant levels - every three (3) hours; f. pH balance - every three (3) hours; g. stabilizer - weekly; h. alkalinity and calcium hardness - weekly. (e) Swimmer load shall not exceed a density of one (1) 4 June 28, 1994 493 (3) A first aid kit which shall be kept filled and readily accessible-for emergency use. (4) A readily accessible room or area designated and equipped for emergency care of casualties. Minimum equipment shall be the first aid kit previously required, a full-length backboard and 2 blankets. (5) A telephone with local emergency numbers for Police, Rescue Services and Fire Department. (6) On all swimming pools, the depth of the water shall be marked plainly at or above the water surface on the vertical wall of the swimming pool and on the edge of the deck next to the swimming pool. Numbers and letters shall be 5 inches in size and of a good contrast with the pool wall and deck. Depth markers shall be placed at the following locations: a. at the points of maximum and minimum depths; b. at the point of change of slope between deep and shallow portions (transient point); c. at intermediate one foot increments of water depth; and d. if the pool if designed for diving, at appropriate points as to denote the water depths in the diving area. (7) Fixed and floating platforms in swimming pools shall be constructed with an air space of at least 1 foot between the water surface and the underside of the platform. (8) There shall be one (1) lifeguard chair provided for every two thousand (2,000) square feet of water surface area within the pool enclosure, except for pools exempt from lifeguard requirements as provided in §4-10(b)(5). (9) A life line shall be provided at the 5 foot break in grade between the shallow and deep portions of the swimming pool, or within 6 inches on either side of the break, with its position marked with June 28, i99~ 495 electrical conductor might fall shall be effectively grounded according to the State Electrical Code. (d) All lighting fixtures shall be prohibited directly above the water surface area except as permitted by the State Electrical Code, and shall be protected in a manner which will prevent broken glass from falling on any surface within the pool area. All electrical switches and receptacles shall be of weatherproof construction and resistant to corrosion. (e) Lights shall be prohibited directly above or within three feet horizontally of the pool rim in any indoor or covered swimming pool, except as permitted in the State Electrical Code. (f) Access to the pool area shall be maintained and unobstructed to provide for emergency service vehicles and emergency attendants to the pool area. Sec. 4-13. Entry and Inspections; Enforcement; Penalti3s. (a) In accordance with the provisions of § 32.1-25 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Health Director shall have the right to enter any property to conduct inspections and to ensure compliance with this ordinance. All public swimming pools in the county may commence operations each year only after being inspected by the Health Director or his designee and receiving a permit from the Director and after complying with all licensing requirements of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Health Director is authorized to require each owner to complete and submit an annual application, all in such form as the Health ,,,: ~~~ June 28, 1994 4(17 _,~ ~ 7 carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 6. Resolution To Join the Virginia Association of Counties Risk Pool VACoRP) for the Sole Purpose of Purchasinc Reinsurance and Third Party Administrative Services. 1Diane Hyatt, Director of Financef R-62894-19 Ms. Hyatt advised that membership in VACoRP will be for the sole purpose of purchasing reinsurance and using their third party administrative services. Mr. Mahoney explained that the County sent a letter to VACoRP that will limit membership to purchasing insurances, and we have received the necessary assurances in writing from VACoRP. No other contributions will be necessary. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 62894-19 TO JOIN THE VIRQINIA ASSOCIATION OF COIINTIES RISK POOL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PtJRCHABINQ REINSIIRANCE AND THIRD PARTY ADMINIBTRATIVE SERVICES WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") desires to protect against liability claims and property losses and to provide for payment of claims or losses for which the County may be liable; and June 28, 1994 499 carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSION i. Chances to the solid Waste Ordinance Mr. Myers reported that in the past, bulk and brush material have been collected on a regularly scheduled, once-per-month basis. On January 25, after several discussions regarding the need for more frequent collection, the Board approved a new bulk and brush collection program. Under the new system, residents will call for this service. Depending on the day of the month when the call is made, a pickup will be scheduled within a period of two days to two weeks. Each route will have a specific schedule. Mr. Myers reviewed the rules that residents would have to follow, and emphasized. the important of adherence to the rules in order to ensure the success of the program. Mr. Hodge advised that other issues to resolve were the refuse collection service on private roads and citizen complaints about damage to these roads; and the continuation of refuse collection to condominiums and townhomes. Currently, the County provides service to about half of these. In response to questions from the Board, staff advised that they plan a publicity campaign to inform the public about changes to bulk and brush collection; and they felt it was very important to encourage the citizens to follow the regulations. June 28, 1994 501 motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Submitted by, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Clerk to the Board Li-s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 72694-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 26 1994, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of June 14, 1994, and June 28, 1994 Minutes 2. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 4. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. 5. Confirmation of Appointment of a Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: G~ Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility A-72694-5.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~.^ a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective July 13, 1994. Homeland Hills (1) 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail (Route 728) (2) 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive (Route 728) SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~ ~~~u^' Brenda J. olton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs ent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections r-~ ~' G% a .. ~ ~ _ ',~ ~i ~° ,~ ~.... _ ~~ , ,. a. _~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET DAVID R. GEHR RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER July 13 , 1994 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolutions dated October 12, 1993, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective July 13, 1994. ADDITIONS LENGTH HOMELAND HILLS Route 728 (Timberland Trail) - From Route 721 to 0.22 mile North- east Route 721 0.22 Mi Route 728 (Ferguson Drive) - From 0.22 mile Northeast Route 721 to 0.46 mile Northwest Route 721 Very truly yours, ~ ~.~~, David R. Gehr Commissioner 0.24 Mi TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY A-72694-5.b ACTION # _ ITEM NUMBER L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Webber Subdivision, Granville & Virginia Webber, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Jack Bess entitled Webber Subdivision, dated February 20, 1990, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $6,300.00. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Webber subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Ro ertson, P.E. Utility irector d,,.»" ~/ APPROVED: 7 , ~~.. ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x to Minnix x Nickens Y cc: File Gary Robertson, Utility Director Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections L-3 NORTH I ~ to ~ 9 I ~Tov R,.y_1w.a ~ 8 ~ 14V Ot;T_ 10600 ~1`_ ~ d M N~~` ~ ~ p4or.+o j ~ 41. s~-r J C.O ; , .. .1'le•3~ 0e Po'°r Ot t ~r t. ~ tl ~ V °,e~n 4~ tn.T' 1 `~ ; ! G.O ~l ~ ~ d« r ~ l . ~iil ~ ~ ? ~INaw LoT a ,1 J i ~ r „w~-1 ~~ 0; n ~ I #3323 I d Q A 4. :, ~ L.. ___ __.J r ~ 0 3T~P.~ ~~ I No ag t_e ~ y9 ' v I 91 ae 'Mr~e...4 w-Ta 1 N ~<' _ . ~+ _.. o~ ~ ~ p ll --_ ~If(.'r_ c: ~ ua.. Erl aT ..y w..~a.i V~~~4 M~.~e~a SPa~+~U~a.wr.- AvE.. Ton Qlrn .59 c1 Ei1~T 1wy SsN. ~JE.W G¢ INJ. Iy. 82.91 MA+r 4o~.E d ~~ tl y E I. , . ~ ~ 1 ~ 6 ~ S W 8 ~. o ~.~. Z -~ / ~ 1 n1 ~P OF J , t5 3 `_ +PR1N~~PWN 7 1 ~ l i - ~ IH {~~... yT.c ~ ^ 1~ '^ PIPE I =~~p ! N r (~f3o PO~i EO To r+ 4~.-~ IOO.l - Mt.v.aOi.E ~. - 11e ToP (i~rn 919=: \~ 4T OG Msw: NV IE 1 Iwr o~.T-iol os INJ IN--9~ 19-' t _,` NOT E IIJVE RI \ To PEE JE0.1 Eo G.: ".ME ~ OF „~N~-~~R~JCTION ~~ I~IV Ihl E1-EV ~o 3E o~. n.9o+E d m F1~0 E Oc VFOI~ 5E ^'1~ o_s T A ^ _ .: ~. ~QOr~E GT Y O F S _ W-va ~w L. (,iNC~aST ~¢ t Vf ' Z ~ E ,~. CJ B. 1225 A' 1169 Yu .^-.v ..,; , '~ ..E.vtPV .E. SHE--'- ~ 1 eE. r e R.-, - ~.IZ -, tl .I I t E=.~c-.ci n F •.I- Tof+R.M=100 o0 WP I ~ 1• IN~I OuT= 'i o.05 y Gopuvo. 101 G ~ E-YI~T1uy S.a.1 ~EwEG u.. Ms .t .. r~ A .tom, e..e..< <~a.a \\ u..ocnam....~o , ErldT,+c ew~.ac- e' .`~-s u...e '~. ~._E ~ p~ ~ Nora ~.~~Y -. R. `~~:: ~.- "'APE-. .I _~~_, _c--c~ ~~~~"~ g-( Tz~P.tioKE GOUtiTY UTIUtT-( OEPA2TME~aT SF~('~i 4rF-a,~ n AF 6'3J,TO~ ~ A„ e P(_.A tV SGALE I = 50 ~~..6._, ..ti ~.~. .~ -T ~~..n~ .. ~~ F.e ..,1 S _ "w II~ M H pt--` w~9r ? EssE~-t~2 tiT ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ~- 3 QEED OF EASEMENT ANL7 ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED GF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 1Qth day of November 1993, by and between: Granville & Virginia Webber hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF St!PERVISQRS OF ROANOKE COt1NTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. NQDGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FQR AND IN GONSIDERATIQN of the mutual benefits to accr~.ae, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and!nr sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been ar may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is mare particularly Shawn and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Webber Subdivision Dated February 20, 199th, made by Jack Bess and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 L.-'° The Developer does h°_.r~'by co~,enant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and wi11 perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hedge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution n_f this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to F,esolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FO!LQWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: By: f ~G~!/. i °r As: 0~~~ State of: County,~rt-q-:+f : to w i t The f.regoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of ~,~ 19 ~~, By: as Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of ~ yc_ Notary Public My Commission expires: ~~~~ ~, / J 9! Page 2 of 3 L.- 3 Approved as to farm: County Attorney State af: County/City af: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia Rv Elmer C. Hodge to wit. The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: , day of i9 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Sup?rvisars of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Cammissiar, e~cpires: Revised 1Q/16/9Q Page 3 of 3 A-72694-5.c ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Community Corrections Resouces Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the July 12, 1994 meeting. Community Corrections Resources Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Mrs. Chris Pickard to serve as a regular member for a one-term term. Her term will expire August 31, 1995. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that this appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, i~ Brenda J. olton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Community Corrections Resources Board File A-72694-5.d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Services Act for At Risk Youth and their Families became effective July 1, 1993 and requires each community to have a Community Policy and Management Team (C.P.M.T.) comprised heads of certain agencies specified in the legislation and two parent representatives. The parent representatives must have children who have been impacted by one of the programs covered under the act which includes those of special education, foster care, youth and family services, etc. Kathy Fusco, one of the current parent representatives, has had a change in her work schedule and has had to resign from this team. Rita Gliniecki, who has worked with Blue Ridge Community Services, has requested to serve on this team and her name is recommended to you by the C.P.M.T. to begin a one year term effective August 1, 1994. The Board of Supervisors is asked to confirm this appointment at your July 26 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: The C.P.M.T. respectfully requests the Board appointment of Ms. Gliniecki to begin service on the C.P.M.T. effective August 1, 1994. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, John M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs ent x x x x x Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Community Policy and Management Team File _ j _ - - _ _ - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ - -_ APPEARANCE REQUEST - i ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = c -_ SUBJECT: ~v.~1"~ id' -_ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. ~ ~ c _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. the Chairman tertained b b ti l if f _ . y e en on may c ar ica = Questions o - __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. , - _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK __ - - D~~ County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Unaudited) Balance at July 26, 1994 Amount 4 625 355 of General Fund Expenditures 5.4% 4 625 355 Submitted By ~ ,c~r~~~_ ~1~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 5.4% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). /~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Unaudited) ~0 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Q-~ County of Roano~Ce, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget $100,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns landfill 50 000 Balance as of July 26, 1994 50 000 Submitted by ~,~~~- Q~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -June 1994 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,486,631.32 Payroll: 6/03/94 $ 555,264.36 6/ 17/94 544,489.48 1,099,753.84 $4,586,385.16 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: E~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) and a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B). FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, hn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE ~~,,,~ Attachment A July 26, 1994 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY Phase I installation of metal studs and wall board is nearly complete; mechanical and duct work is on schedule. Phase II masonry work is over 50% complete, and the floor has been poured. The roof decking for Phase I is complete, and Phase II has started. Phase I windows and doors have been installed. Due to delays in shipment of some furniture and fixtures, the project may be up to one week behind schedule. With substantial completion of construction projected for September 30, permanent installation of major furnishings will be scheduled for the first week in October. Plans have been developed for moving library operations from the old sections of the building and setting up interior operations in Phase I and II areas while Phase III demolition and renovations are underway. This move will take place over the Labor Day weekend from September 3 - 6, and will result in relatively limited disruption of library services. DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL The feasibility study is complete and ready for presentation to the Board of Supervisors. PARKS AND RECREATION Bonsack Park -The project has been completed. Walrond Park -The project has been completed. VALLEY TECHPARK Dixon contracting completed construction of the stormwater management facility and extension of the water and sewer lines. VDOT's contractor, Adams/Thomas Brothers, projects that the road will be completed near the end of September. The staff is working towards developing a landscaping plan for the park. FIRE HYDRANTS The hydrant bond project is complete and within budget. A total of 58 hydrants were installed County wide. There were 24 hydrants installed in North County, 23 additional hydrants in South County, 6 in the Vinton area and 5 in West County. The remaining funds in this project will be used for reseeding and paving if necessary. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY BUDGET CONTRACT $ 1,500 EXPENDITURES TO DATE PROJECT COORDINATORe SPERCER WATTS ACCOUNT CODEt 104030• n- 5 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR NAY JUN JUL AUG SEP A fi E PROPOSALS PLANNED ~?~"" ?:~::: :%:%'?: :~.:`•:.":~:':::: DESIGN ACTUAL ':;%:%~ :~?%y;: ~:;: BIDS PLANNED :•%:%~~'%': t~:~::~i~<%:~ ACTUAL . •:;i:;:;y:"' . f.'t~ CONSTRUCTION PLANNED :~::~%:%'r. :•:{{:;:•.'•.':f;;: ~:~~~'~:;:~i Y;:;i'<:~ ~:~:~br ~: :y%%f::'r'fi`• ;'•..1:<%%% :;::~:::'~.;f :~•.`•::~: l: : r/%~ ::~<.'•!:;: 'i3{/:'•,;r. ;.::r.:f. y'{/; <5::>:::::.• ::?%/~:~5:%~ ACTUAL ......... .. :: ~:.:.,••• ........ . ::::::::: ::::::::::.:. TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Phase i installation of metal studs and wall board is nearly complete; mechanical and duct work is on schedule. Phase II masonry work is over 508 complete, and the floor has been poured. The roof decking for Phase I is complete, and Phase ii has started. Phase I windows and doors have been installed. Due to delays in shipment of some furniture and fixtures, the project may be up to one week behind schedule. With substantial completion of construction projected for September 30, permanent installation of major furnishings will be scheduled for the first week in October. Plans have been developed for moving library operations from the old sections of the building and setting up interior operations in Phase I & Phase II areas while Phase iIi demolition and renovations are under way. This move will take place over the Labor Day weekend, from September 3 - 6, and will result in relatively limited disruption of library services. BOND PROJECT UPDATE ~° Attachment B July 26, 1994 DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT BUDGET CONTRACT $ 2t~00 EXPENDITURES TO DATE ,9 PROJECT COORDIHATORt OEORCE SIMPBOR ACCOURT CODEt 104040 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 q BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT ACTUAL •::g,;: •:••,••:; .::: •;', ::... .. PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL ~:~:~~~>:::~y:~ ::.:::: ;:%;•y{;•.',:::~~ .: : :i'r% .. ::: :~::~:%~~~'~~~~ y .. :.~::::. PREPARE PLANNED :•:.rf•;...:<• :•:•:::•s:•:•:.:: •;:::o:•;:•::•:•s :•:•::%:,,/!:::~:~: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE PLANNED FOR BIDS ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED COMPLETION ACTUAL PROJECT PLANNED CLOSEOUT ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The feasibility study is complete and ready for presentation to the Board of Supervisors. 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET CONTRACT $ ~a-0 EXPENDITURES TO DATE PROJECT COORDIBATORt BUTCB WORIQIAB ACCOUBT CODBe 109050 p_s TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FSB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED :%r~y: ,,:.,,:::y';:;: i ::::•: • ACTUAL ~ •':::•>; :<:::•,••:?;:;:: :::.;>:•,•:;;:;':; :::;g;~:::#`: f:;::r•lr': MEET WITH CITIZENS PLANNED ~'~:;;'j% ACTUAL BID, PRE-BID CONFERENCE PLANNED .::;;:;:~,:;: ~~:~'%f~%~:.:~::: ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED %~55 '::•''•:r~;:: ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED "f ~'"'• "'~"''"""'' '' ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Mattern 6 Craig will be designing the early warning system. 3 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 BUDGET $ ~,~60 PROJECT COORDINATORt DRAINAGE PROJECTS - GREEN VALLEY CONTRACT 97, 00 BUTCH WORKMAN EXPENDITURES TO DATE , 0 ACCOURT CODBt 109050 (~ .S TASK 1 9 9 3 1 g g 9 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PRASE PLANNED 'y.,•'~iii~ ;;+'~~f~'f~ ACTUAL MEET WITA CITIZENS/VDOT PLANNED ~~;;~.'•3:'• ::%;r~:;::~::~ rf: :<:;::r: :::.::::.•.•a: :: •':~::+2::::: ::.,.. ./f ACTUAL SID PLANNED ':~•i.;:•'::~: ...... :?%•:3,••. ACTUAL .... ............ AWARD CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ::::;:::;:;;~:' ~'~~~%%•'•' ~':.: ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ~>%%%%•`•%~~ .::...:: •::.. ~~%~%"•''-:+~' ... .. ':!/,:,;;: :•:..:.:•r:•.. ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL 22,000 COMMENTS: 1. Phase Z Murray Run below F 6 W building (Upstream from Phase ii) 2. Phase II trunk line along Colony Lane and drainage easement. 3. Phase I - $7,500 from F 6 W and $15,000 from Drainage Budget Phase II - $75,000 from Bond 4. P-120 to be constructed with Phase II. 4 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - MASON CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT $ ~00 EXPENDITURES TO DATE PROJECT COORDIBATORt HUTCB WORRMAB ACCOUBT CODBt 109050 ~~ TASR 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEH MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANNED '''~''''~~ `'`:'•`{%r~:~ ~'~~~'?" ':~:~f%•`•%f (FIELD) ACTUAL .••f••.•: ::: i•:::. •.•• ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED :%3:~% ACTUAL ............ DESIGN PLANNED : ff ~<:;~::~:y::: ~'s'i'•>:#~:,:,: ACTUAL MEET WITH CITIZENS PLANNED '?~^.,•}`}%i ACTUAL ~%`::::::: .•.;y::::::: .: y::;:; CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: No permanent easements are needed. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - MT. VERNON HEIGHTS BUDGET CONTRACT $ -'Fb,a00 EXPENDITURES TO DATE 2 , . PAOJBCT COOADIAATORt BUTCB WORKMAN ACCOUNT CODBt 109050 p._s TASX 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAY JUN JUL AUG SEP DESIGN PLANNED ::f ~;l;: ACTUAL r%~'':~%%: MEET WITH CITIZENS PLANNED '~~%f%•'•"~~~~%~ ACTUAL HOURLY CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED :~:;::'.'•:: .::• ACTUAL ':?:,:::.>'.'•'• COMMENTS: Project is complete. 6 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - WOLFE CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~~~00 PROJHCT COORDIHATORt BUTCH WORRMAII ACCOUHT CODSt 104050 (~-5 TASK SELECT PLANNED SURVEYING FIRM ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED (AERIAL) ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH VDOT PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL PRE-BID PLANNED CONFERENCE (SID) ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL l l 9 l 9 l 3 l I l l 9 ~ 9 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. VDOT participation at crossing of creek on Stoneridge Circle. 7 p -s BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~SO 0 ACCOUNT CODB~ 104050 PROJECT COORDINATORe G80RC8 SIItPSON K 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 TAS BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP RFP PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES ACTUAL ~ ~ ............ ~:;ii.''%~:t%.',: :•>:•»:•:.:~•: ........ '•~r.'.,'••;•:!'• ~••~••• . `%~>i<~:~ #:•`:•`•r>'~':~: SELECT PLANNED :::;:~::•.;:; :;~;$::%: :::::~:•:r;iS:: ::iS:;;;:•::c•; ;:;::::.:::::.. CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED WATERSHED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL PLANNED POLICY CTUAL A REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED INVESTIGATION ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROD. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Request for proposal is complete. we are awaiting official confirmation of grant approval from FEMA. 8 -5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 1,~~00 Expen tures: , ACCOUNT CODSt 104209, 104201, 104203 PROJECT COORDINATORt JOHN C8A103LI88 104204 TASK WALAOND PARR PLANNED SOCCER FIELD ACTUAL WALROND PARK PLANNED 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL NORTHSIDE PLANNED REALIGN FIELDS ACTUAL BONSACK PARK PLANNED BALL FIELD ACTUAL BONSACK PARK PLANNED PICNIC SHELTER ACTUAL 1 n 9 - 9 3 - 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR NAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 31, 000 : %.•,L,`4'„1~•,,:?: : ;~;'~.•`.;: rr:':i'•• ....: ...:.: ..:•:: ?': ............ ....; ...... y 62 , 000 . ; ... . :;i.~~,`4,'.I~,,:•':'::: ::~ ;::.''~.'.+J~;:;:; .~~~ 9 2 , 2 ::.......... ............ 52,000 20,000 44,054 15,000 12,582 BONSACK PARK PLANNED 10,000 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ACTUAL 8,997 VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 62,000 2 BASEBALL FIELDS ACTUAL 6,098 VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 150,000 LIGHT SOCCER FIELD ACTUAL 157,709 TOTAL ~ NED 402,000 ACTUAL 325,238 COMMENTS: Northside Hallfields -The construction has been completed. The hook up to the water main will occur with the development o the Forens cs Lab adjacent to our property. Bonsack Park -Project has been completed. Walrond Park -Project has been completed. 9 .,~„ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 1500 ACCOUlIT CODSt 104204, 104210, 104212 PROJECT COORDI1iATORt JOBH C8AlIBLISS 104205, 104207 COMMENTS: Vinyard Park -Construction of the two baseball fields and parking is in progress. 10 ~_s BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS EXPENDITURES TO DATE BUDGET CONTRACT $ 1~~00 ACCWNT CODSt 104207, 104211, 104206, PROJECT COORDIIIATORs JOR)t CHAI~LI88 104213, 104202 N =ENCUMBERED EXPENSES K 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 TAS BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ` ' ' WHISPERING PLANNED 60, 000 E;:~DTgE%~ : ;:~:~;:`; ; '~;~x.~i.•:: •?: % ~:•1:... ,,,?:' ., :.~. PINES - LIGHT BALLFIELD ACTUAL 0 WHISPERING PLANNED 25,000 ,,.• .;,;.....;;., _ PINES ;. :£' ' .%. ~i RESTROOM UTIL ACTUAL 0 :;:;:'A`.•.~d. ~;; ::;~::: ::~:: ::~:;:i : ::~ • :•: ::.......... :s•: ............ WHISPERING PLANNED 36, 000 ~?~i~~:~ % ' ' " ........ .. 3::iSry PINES -TENNIS/ . ~:, <:: i: :~ ... ~ :.':'~"':::':` :::::%Yf::: :;: 'A ~ %i.`::::': ::::2 DTA•' : ~ : '• Sss:.:.::'::;:;.: ::;:' 2 ~ ~ ~3 .: ::..::...::. ::;#~~ ::: ~' ~ .: :::~~ ::: BASKETBALL CT ACTUAL 0 :;:;:';~,',~'3::: :::t,Y.~~T1~:~:;: :%i',~ .::: :::'~S~I::: ::::: ,:i;# . : , } ; ; ; :: , , , , , .: • ~ ~:' ~' ~ • ~ ' :' GREEN HILL PK CANNED P 30,000 ..;..::::: ••. ::~:~~i~.ll,:: :::.y:::::.:•• .~.,,.% :: ~i .:.;•:...:.;• : ,• ~ :: : •: : •: : >; t.: ': ::..... ..... • • :>. : ....: .... :~:r:'~:~:X•: ::; :•;:' '''r.:%%:: :::r.•:r.: ' :•.:r<:•: ::•::~:•:•.~::: •:::•»:•::•: ~•. ::~<f:~:i:~r'•: •:::.. :. 2 PICNI .;;;......;, ' :.~ : ~' ~ . : f' ~" ; ~ ` ~ . . .; .;: ~ ~ ' ~ : ::: : r~+ ~: ::: : .:.. :%:~ :~ t• ~ ti~ +~ ::;:;;: :;:;,~,",.,~,,:.>: :•>:.~'.1~,.~ ..::: ::..:...::•: :~:•.......... SHELTERS ACTUAL 21,973 :; :,~i...~. ,,:: •1~ %::;• ::: „ : , i: , + ;. i, ., , ,, : ... . t . . .. . GARST MILL PK PLANNED 124,000 AL L 2 GHT LI ' #: ~~}; : :~~!13.#< : ~ :~ji... ::::~~ii . ........... FIELDS ACTUAL 982 3: :::~~~ ::; ::.......... . WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 50,000 AREA PURCHASE LAND ACTUAL 0 WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62, 000 :~~,i :~~~y AREA - 2 BALL FI8LD5 ACTUAL 0 STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62,000 2 BASEBALL r>::•;:;;; ; ;'f.:~i ' ~Si~:•':•'•+~ ~ ` FIELDS ACTUAL 94,539 i rr•;:;:;;: • TOTAL PLANNED 999,000 ACTUAL 67,494 COMMENTS: Whis erin Pines Park -The engineering work has been completed and is being bid. This work includes a new baseball field, an a comb nat on asketball/tennis court. 11 p-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 160 0 ACCOUHT CODB~ 104202, 104214, 104218, PROJECT COORDIHATORt JOHH CHAMBLI88 104220, 104219 SK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 TA BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB NAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP . .. STARRSY PARK PLANNED 31, 000 t '•r':: ? : i~~x~••;; :::::::.: ••:• •:: . r~ : : •: • :• :::•~'•:;: :: ::~~:: :• • `r:• r. :: •;.; :':~v:; ' 1 L BAL BA SE . • • i ~ . ..; : :: 'io:" : ; . :::. ; ~G ` ' ~ ` ::: •f' `4 ' 1~ `•: i:~:E ' ':•~' `' ; :.': r.~t k§ ~~~: FIELD ACTUAL 67, 995 : ..ki~:: . . :: .~. : ., : , , ,. , , . ,, . : . STARKEY PARK PLANNED 62,000 LIGHT 1 FIELD :t•:r:•:::• :• ::~%:: '•; ~~::: ~ :;:~:~/. ::`•`:••;:: :;8:'•:;: :t!:'•• :~:%~~+%%::~% . . . ACTUAL 6 391 r ";:~: :•~`::;: :. :%::.5,,,~::~ ~:~ r:•:r~;;r, :•..f. ~:~~~:•::•% :::n:nn:: :. •: s:~:Yr:: .;;:. :<:!f::• ~;:%::~::..; •::•%.:.::.'•:•: ,.'•:f::$:~5;:~ •> •i:•iii:•i:•i::: :::.... f.::: •~:•.•:i.. •::: :...... . ::. :~ ' ' ` G '~ ::~' ~ '~~ ii :i L~ 1:::~: •` :;: Z•`4' •~• :: STARKEY PARK PLANNED 25, 000 :.; : : ~;:;' ; . . , , , ; ; • , , :. ., „ L UT OOM STR RE y~~`;:: ACTUAL 0 TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210,400 ~'%~'•~~•+~~•'•' • +~'%" NATIONS RENO ` • ` ` ACTUAL 1,000 :;: ',•~. „ ::%; ,,##G. BALL FIELD PLANNED 62,000 ~:~'~.~~'~~ `%:~'~~.~~ G CIN EN F " • ' ' : : b ~ ' r 1'S~ : : : : ' : 4 ~• :;: ' : l' J 1 ~ : ::: '~' • ::~f?~:. ACTUAL 12,975 k •,: :;::d~# •,:: ::>:~~~3:;:;: ,::%: :;:;;~1'~ ; ,:: {°i , ::: .G•, ; : : : . ;. :,. , , • :z .:. , . „ . . c ............ ............ FACILITY PLANNED 91, 000 ......., S PAI RE ` ~ '':~J:± ~' i:i1~Y %.• 'i: 5:~ ' ' ~ :•: ~~~l.. ff Yi:•F~S:i':•:•: . is rte:;: CRAIG AVENUE ACTUAL 791 36, :•::~:: ••::•.:: •: •.L ::::.:• :::::.. •::•,L ,i:s•:':~::~:: :::.:: .;.;.;. ~::;~:::~;::: ::::::::.:•:: :%:::~:::~: ::: :::::::.;:::: : •: • :: :::::::.s•::: :.;•::::::::: :.:::.::::r:;: :<•.~ ~::.::: :•: .:::::::::. ::rid. :::•»s:•::•»r FACILITY PLANNED 11x000 REPAIRS •sr•;;•::•;::t•: :••rr::: •:::•: •:::::: •::: ' ` ~' LEISURE ARTS ACTUAL 0 ;;:;:~~: ':~:::::: y,2: .'• • .. :::::, ............ ........... . FACILITY PLANNED 4,500 . . ....... .. , IRS EPA R ` ~ : ~ ` ; %%:~ :: ' ~ : WALROND OFC. ACTUAL 2, 115 ::::~:;;<:::::: ::::?~::;:; ~: ::;:;~::~:%': ::~!?::::::: : : 5: 1:%<~:%: ;:;: }: :: •: :; . + .. ::.......... .:......... . TOTAL PLANNED 446,900 ACTUAL 128,767 COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations - Bida are being received for tennis court repairs. Ball Field Fencing - The bid has been awarded; the schedule has been prioritized; and work has begun. 12 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 1,~~00 PROJBCT COORDINATORt JO811 CHAMBLI88 ACCOUIIT CODB~ 104221, 104216, 104217, 104208 r Lpl. vran TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ~. ADA ACCESS PLANNED 15,100 ;:;:;':;:; ACTUAL :.::::::::::. GROUND COVER PLANNED 42,000 :.::......::. ;;;::; Y- PLA FOR 'r': 'i#:`ii:: •. ` :iY~~~:~:~: ... ~~~:~:::'•,•';:: :#:~i% z • ~ ~' ::'?:#':2< ~4 4' " : : ~ ;:'33'r'3i;ij : '~ ~ : %: ' ' I ~ ::3i~'r':`•~: ~:t ::~ ~'' Q :~:;:~:;:%: ~1 ;: ~' ::;> i%:~:'•:: : .:Y: .'~t ~ GROUND EQUIP. ACTUAL 30, 102 :;~:~~~3:• ::: ::;~~~::: :::~~~:: t:::. .. ..: . . , ; • ?: : ;. v : i. .. .. . . : . l.• . , • • , . INFIELD SURF. PLANNED 54, 000 ::,~~,+ .. ... .;;......:.. ca::•:r::::. ERIALS FOR v:: ;v..::;:. ~~%"'•'%~~'~~" '' ~ ~ ~~ :y:' :: • • ,... : :' : : ' MAT x:.: ni:• •• i '••::• : ~~~i '/l i ;:;:• :F:?i,•i,:>'i:% ~+ • : ~f•~ ~ • • :.!:::::ss;•. • •>:• ; .// . •F: •5:::6 {•S: : : ..; ~.,:;;:: . i v:J.•:::J: ; :;:f is :JlluI,,.';{. %:::<{%: .. •::1.,+. < ; %::t :: BASEBALL ACTUAL 200 96 : . ::::<s•:::::•. :% : rv ' Y i .,;:...f<::•: :'::: ~ ~: ;t ,S{ ,•:ti< i .:. `::~ ~~. ::• :i!?r:::• •... • ::.:. :::: ........::. . , ::% ~~ ' ~' ' .: ~::~~ • ~ Y ~ ~ ELDS FI , . ,, . ,., . n.:. ,,, , , .:. i:Y ::. , ~'•: : :::.'•'{,:%;:;.';:: ~•'•k~i:;ri,'yS> •.••,•.•~r„/.,: %k,., i,.• :, •, ;;i/.;..y r :::::: i / a:?f : .F::::.,.,... :•: : :•:II.• CAREER CENTER PLANNED 60, 000 2:C:4'.h~,.:';: :;L',•`•I`Jk~;%% :,. :•::,,,.: ;. ;,;, f•::;: • REPLACE LIGHTS ::::•.....:. :::.::;•:::•: ..::~• ... .:•5;'•%"%'••:: :•>::...; :: :.;.. ..:: •s, •>;:::.: :~ir•;:•t:•:: •::.':::::•::•: •. ::.i.. ::. .in:.:.f.. .; ~:~: :~':~;.;:/.;:;. ACTUAL 90, 62 :•:.4,".b1~ ... ............ ....... TOTAL PLANNED 171,100 ACTUAL 116,927 COMMENTS: Ground cover materials for use around play apparatus has been bid and will be installed by County staff. 13 ~_5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 ROAD PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~~0 0 t $ 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDIIIATORt AR110LD COVEY ACCOUIIT CODSt 104070 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAY JUN JUL AUG SEP VDOT PLANNED ADVERTISES ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS PLANNED i°•'~`~f';" CONTRACT ON ALL PROJECTS TS ACTUAL ANNED :•:;;::.;•..: l:~.•:~i'i:% :..::.: r•::: i ••.::::u~.:;;. ;::::•:%•:••: :::.~•;:<•: •: F•: :... ff. • :••i~ i'}%%.. .: /. ..: f.: ii •~~ F.... f?:::: ~. ........... ALL PROJ CONSTRUCTED 6 COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: All plant mix projects completed except Sierra Drive which will be completed this coming spring (1994). Incidental projects (4 projects) -Deed preparation has been completed for Ridgelea Road. Documents have yet to be signed by property owners. VDOT is working on the deed preparation on Willow Branch Road, Eveningwood Lane and Cove Road. VDOT plans to begin construction on all projects this coming fall or spring of 1995. 14 b~s BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~SO 0 ~ Pno.78CT COORDIXATORt BRIAR T. Dt111CA11 ACCOURT CODSt TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB 1SAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MASTER PLAN PLANNED ACTUAL '''•s •~%~: LAND PLANNED ACQUISITION/ EXCHANGE ACTUAL DETAIL PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL .;r~+~:; .y.:.; INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ACCESS REQUEST ACTUAL •;:.:::::•s:•: CONSTRUCTION PLANNED •:::::::::::. BIDS AD START RO ACTUAL PLANNED ;;~:.:<::::; :?::%%':; •:.f:•::::. ; >: ~±:: ::. `• ~:~:~'~: : ' ~ j:~:' : ' UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL .;... :;:~: : .: ,' : ~:,.:~•: ,: : TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Dixon contracting completed construction of the stormwater management facility and extension of the water and sewer lines. VDOT's contractor, Adams/Thomas Brothers, projects that the road will be completed near the end of September. The staff is working towards developing a landscaping plan for the park. 15 ~.~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 FIRE HYDRANTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ ~8A~00 J. P. Turner 8 ~ PROJECT COORDINATORt R01i BDWARDB ACCOUNT CODBt TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP INSTALLATION PLANNED ACTUAL FINAL INSP., PLANNED r~~,.i~ :;:;:~i%;;,y ACCEPTANCE & PROJECT COMPLETION CTUAL :`.'•~Y::Yy :::~.,•~:~i/.• ;•'{,'.:::,:;<n: ~~~%~:~ :;:~%J.;:;•:.; :::!!:•::.::5:; TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The hydrant project is complete and within budget. A total of 58 hydrants were installed County wide. There were 24 hydrants installed in North County, 23 additional hydrants in South County, 6 in the Vinton area and 5 in Weat County. The remaining funds in this project will be used for reseeding and paving if necessary. 16 a-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B July 26, 1994 BUDGET $ ~1~00 PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE ACCOUNT CODSa 155140 PROJECT COORDIHATORSt JOH]i CBANHLISB ARD 80HER DUFF TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PURCHASE OF PLANNED 750,000 LAND ACTUAL 240,121 TOTAL PLANNED 750,000 ACTUAL 240,121 COMMENTS: 17 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER _ AT A VIRGINIA HELDIAT THE ROANOKERDCOUNTY ADMINISTRAT ONRCENOTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session with the Fire and Rescue Ad Hoc Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I have reviewed the suggestions from the last Board Meeting and letters from the volunteer units regarding the upcoming Fire & Rescue Work session. The Committee has put a lot of effort into the David M. Griffith vehicle study which is where the Board asked us to begin. We plan to analyze the Career Firefighters Report, the Virginia Tech report, and the Long Range Plan as you have requested and cover these in future work sessions. It is important that we approach this systematically because there are a number of issues involved. I do not favor all of the recommendations made by Griffith but there are a number that can be helpful to us. We certainly need to improve our retention schedules and purchasing specifications. There needs to be improvement in the working relationship between the paid and volunteer staff even though the problem is nonexistent in many stations. The competition between the two groups is not all negative and in fact has strengthened some aspects of the system. Average response times have improved and so has reporting. Somehow we need to all see that we are working on the . ~Co The Committee plans to addressethis ailn' the next 'fewlweeksr Team Since the Committee has put so much time and effort into the first report, I want to give them a chance to be heard. This will be vitally important to their future efforts. If we want to change the sequence in which we address the issues, we can let them know at that time. Our approach has been to "analyze, educate, learn, include, involve, and then to draw conclusions." This will require more time but will hopefully, give everyone a chance to be heard and make for a smoother implementation. I think you will be pleased with the work that John Chambliss, Chief Fuqua and the Committee have put into this work session. ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Board of Supervisors approved the scheduling of a work session with the Ad Hoc Committee studying Fire and Rescue issues. This will be the first meeting with the Board and the Committee would like to discuss its findings related to the David M. Griffith study of the Membersl of the D ommitteetplan to be presentlat 4000 to Departmen participate in this discussion. Future plans of the Ad Hoc Committee will be to address the Staffing issues facing the Department based on the Virginia Tech Study, the Fire Fighters Association Report, the Budget request by the Fire and Rescue Chiefs during the budget session and the overall loovanced LifelSuppo t servicesnaspwellrastFiresandsRescue for both Ad services. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the work session be held with the Ad Hoc Committee concerning their review of the fleet issues and offer any general direction to the Committee as they proceed to study the staffing issues . p, ro ed bye Respectfully submitted, pp John M. Chamblis Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator _ ------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion b No Yes Abs Approved ( ) y= Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred ( ) Minnix To ( ) Nickens l~~ AD HOC COMMITTEE WORK SESSION WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AT THE JULY 26, 1994 MEETING FINDINGS ON THE DMG STUDY RE VEHICLES The David M. Griffith Review of the Fleet Size and Deployment and Replacement Plan for the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department was completed April 11, 1994 and was referred to the Ad Hoc Committee for evaluation and implementation. Griffith personnel interviewed all but one of the volunteer Chiefs and all of the career Captains to obtain data for their study. They also reviewed maintenance records and compared fleet size and deployment to comparable departments within Virginia. The Ad Hoc Committee feels that several of the findings and recommendations of the Griffith study are good; however, the committee feels that other approaches would be more acceptable and appropriate for Roanoke County in other areas. This work session will address those findings. STANDARDIZATION OF EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS The Griffith study offered recommendations for several positive changes in the procurement of apparatus and one of these recommendations is the standardization of apparatus. In recent years, specifications for the apparatus ordered have been prepared by the individual fire or rescue organization to receive a piece of equipment with their individual desires for customized features including compartmentation, specialized equipment, etc. which reflect the preferences of the local organization rather than the needs of the County as a whole. These changes to the standard design of the manufacturer often add to the cost of the equipment and could result in apparatus which is deemed to be too big, too fancy or ill-equipped. The Griffith report (Page 21) described several advantages of standardization of equipment: Allows the establishment of standard maintenance routines. - Reduces operating and maintenance costs through volume discounted maintenance contracts. - Reduces capital cost by buying at fleet discounts or off of state or standard contracts. - The specifications could also include a listing of available options and accessories that could be ordered by the local companies. The Board may wish to decide who should pay for these options; however, the optional or accessory equipment should remain with the station which purchased it, when possible. 1 ~~ The Committee also recognizes that the practice of buying units using the standard compartmentation could reduce the time required to produce the unit since the parts do not have to be custom designed use of the standard configuration of the manufacturer's equipment could also prove to be a safer design because our specifications could alter the length of the wheel base or drive train configuration. USE OF COMMITTEE TO ESTABLISH SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PURCHASE OF APPARATUS Both the Griffith report and the Virginia Tech study have suggested use of a Total Quality Management (TQM) approach of solving this type of issue by using committees of persons involved in the operation to assist in providing solutions. The Ad Hoc Committee strongly supports this concept and urges the Chief to establish a committee using volunteers, career personnel, and others involved in the management of the Count ypleet in aratuslwe the standard set of specifications for each t e of app will be purchasing. Suggested types include: - Pumper - Tanker - Ladder - Utility vehicle (Could be from State Contract) - Sedan (Could be from State Contract) - Pick-up / Brush Truck (Could be from State Contract) - Ambulance (Could be from State Contract) - Any other specialize piece of equipment available for County- wide use A Committee should also establish a standard evaluation form for each piece of equipment to help prioritize the replacement of units. The trigger mechanism for consideration could include mileage, age, overall maintenance costs and current condition of vehicle. Based on the information collected, the committee could determine the suitability of refurbishment rather than replacement of the unit. Based on the overall need of the County, the vehicle may still have some useful life in a lower call volume station rather than putting a new piece of equipment in that station. Under this scenario, the worst piece of equipment would be taken out of service, thereby reducing the on-going maintenance cost of the department. As an example, the committees could be comprised of the following individuals: - One volunteer Fire Chief (Rescue Chief for rescue equipment) - One volunteer fire fighter (Rescue member for rescue equipment) - One career Fire Captain 2 ~~ - One career fire fighter (career paramedic for rescue equipment) - Fire Department Mechanic - One member from the Fire and Rescue Department Administration - A representative from Procurement - County Fleet Manager or representative COMMITTEE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR THE RUNNING GEAR ON COUNTY OWNED APPARATUS Using the same reasoning as the factors listed for establishing standardized vehicles, a committee should be established by the Chief of the Department to standardize certain pieces of operating equipment, particularly on the ambulances. Equipment such as defibrilators are extremely technical and have different capabilities. In the case of the career paramedic fire fighters, they often have to operate from different stations and may encounter different types of equipment. Standardization of this type of equipment would improve our ability to get coordinated service contracts, possible discounts on the purchase of new equipment and ease of operation by our service personnel. STANDARDS OF MAINTENANCE All County owned apparatus (fire or rescue) are maintained at the County's expense. In the fire service, all vehicles except for "Car 50", a utility vehicle, are maintained by the County. In the rescue service, all of the apparatus owned by the volunteers are maintained by the volunteers (24 of 37 units). The County provides fuel and insurance to both County and Volunteer owned equipment (except "Car 30") which is operated by the volunteers. The Griffith study recommended increased funding for maintenance of the equipment of the department (by $35,000 per year), particularly with the aging fleet. The study also noted an absence of consistent maintenance records or standards, particularly when the volunteer organizations maintained their own vehicles. The Griffith report also gave other considerations concerning maintenance of the portion of the fleet owned by the volunteers: - Continue to allow the volunteers to maintain their own units at their discretion (status quo); or - Require the volunteers to utilize the County garage for all repairs, with costs charged-back to the organization; or - Have the County take over all repair and financial responsibilities. The Committee suggests that the volunteers have all work performed by a County approved and contracted vendor, with the volunteers responsible for the cost. 3 ~-- Finally, the Griffith report gave a recommended number of rescue vehicles which would be owned by the County. The squad vehicles would be owned and maintained by the volunteers, the front-line ambulances would be owned and maintained by the County, and back-up vehicles would be maintained by the volunteers. The Ad Hoc Committee suggests that the number of front-line ambulances needed at each station be determined by the County and that the County assume responsibility for those vehicles. Based upon the deployment of ambulances suggested by the consultant, the estimated additional cost for this change in funding for maintenance would be ($2,300 x 6) $13,800. As these front-line ambulances are replaced, they would be purchased by the County in accordance with the replacement plan. STANDARD LEVELS OF EQUIPMENT, OWNERSHIP OF EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORITY TO DEPLOY AS NECESSARY The consultant indicated that the basic configuration of our fire and rescue fleet was good and that basic deployment was correct. The consultant recommended the elimination of 4 pieces of fire apparatus from front line service, a reduction in the number of utility type vehicles owned and maintained by the County to one per station (service district), the lack of need to replace two ambulances currently owned by volunteers, and the suggestion to re- deploy one of the County owned ambulances to a different station to meet the deployment needs. Each of the volunteer organizations received a copy of the consultant's report and copies of their responses are attached. The Ad Hoc Committee has several recommendations, some of which do not parallel the consultant's report: - The County should establish a committee through the Chief of Fire and Rescue to determine the level of apparatus needed at each station (fire and rescue) using information contained in the Griffith study and local knowledge. The Griffith report suggested deleting two tankers (T-4 and T-9), both of which serve very rural areas of the County. The Ad Hoc Committee feels that the vehicle slots for these two vehicles should be retained. The Committee does not suggest placing these units in line for replacement with new apparatus, but with serviceable tankers which may come out of service from other areas of the County. 4 "~~ I - The consultant suggested that the County retain three reserve pumper type trucks to be placed in service when the front-line piece of equipment from a station was incapacitated or in the need of greater pump capacity at a major incident. The Ad Hoc Committee concurs in this suggestion and defers the station assignment to the Chief of the County Department. - The consultant recommended the elimination of the Foam Unit located at the Cave Spring Fire Department. The volunteer organization indicated that the unit was modified by the volunteers and was called to assist areas outside of the County during 1993 and also is available to protect the tank farm in the Starkey Road area of the County. The Ad Hoc Committee feels that since some foam equipment is already located on most front-line pieces of apparatus, that the special equipment and a supply of foam could be placed on a smaller vehicle like the pick-up truck (Utility 3 ) which would allow a faster response and would eliminate one of the larger pieces of equipment. - The consultant also recommended transferring one of the three County owned ambulances from Mt. Pleasant Rescue to Cave Spring Rescue based on the number of calls responded to by each of the crews. The Mt. Pleasant Rescue Squad indicated that the third unit is used by their crew for training and transport by their crew, which are not reflected in the calls for service reviewed by the consultant. The Ad Hoc Committee feels that for equipment owned by the County, the Chief should be able to re-deploy as needed to provide service to all of the residents of Roanoke County. The consultant recommended that the County only provide one utility (errand type) vehicle per station (service district). The committee suggests that any extra errand type vehicle be bought, insured and maintained by the volunteers, however, the County should cover fuel costs. At no time should the addition of this type of vehicle create the need for more space at the facility. Service units (ambulance, squad, air truck, etc. ) which may have been bought by the volunteers, but serves a designated need as established by the County, should be maintained, insured and fueled by the County. The maintenance could be in allowing the County to pay the maintenance invoices or to provide a maintenance allocation to the volunteer unit. 5 ~~ Three of the stations currently have two vehicles designated as utility type vehicles which are owned by the County. After a review of their use (as outlined below), the Committee makes the following suggestions: Utility 8 (Bent Mountain) is a carryall type vehicle equipped with special pumping equipment and generator to draw water from ponds, or other remote water locations which cannot be easily reached by the larger fire apparatus. The Committee recognizes that this capability is available for use to other areas of the County as needed much like the Air Truck and therefore should be considered a special purpose vehicle instead of a utility vehicle. The second utility type vehicle at Bent Mountain is a sedan which is used to go to training, etc. As noted earlier, Utility 3 (Cave Spring) is a heavy duty pick-up which could be equipped with the special foam equipment if the Foam Unit is eliminated. If used in this fashion, the Committee considers this as a special purpose vehicle. The station also has a sedan (Car 3) which could be used for transportation, training etc. Mt. Pleasant has a van (Utility 6) and a sedan (Car 6), both of which are owned by the County and are available for transporting personnel to training, etc. The station also has two special purpose vehicles such as a Brush Truck and a Haz-Mat truck assigned to the station. One of the County owned utility type vehicles at Station 6 should be designated as surplus. - Rescue 10 (Mason's Cove) had requested another utility vehicle (sedan) to be used for transporting members to training, etc. The Board of Supervisors previously sent this request to the Ad Hoc Committee for consideration. The Committee endorses the attached suggestion from Chief Fuqua concerning the assignment of Car 10 to the rescue squad with the unit also being available for use by the career staff or fire department, if available, rather than providing another utility vehicle at this site. The volunteer fire department also has the utility vehicle donated by the Moose Lodge which the County maintains that is used to assist in their training and transportation needs. 6 _=~_ ~ ROTATION OF EQUIPMENT AND OTHER OPERATIONAL ISSUES The consultant suggested rotation of the fire apparatus and proposed the useful life cycle of the various pieces of apparatus. The Ad Hoc Committee has discussed this proposal at great length and is divided on the recommendation. The committee does not feel that the overall condition of the present fleet allows us to begin the rotation program at this time. To work effectively, we need a newer complement of vehicles which could be used in the high call volume stations for approximately three years and then rotating them to lesser volume stations for the remainder of their useful life. When and if the vehicles are rotated, they need to be in top-notch working condition with a good physical appearance. The pride of the volunteer organizations is important in recruiting and retaining members as well as the need to provide suitable equipment for service. The suggested life cycle of 15 years for ladder trucks is too short in the opinion of our committee which we are able to confirm with surrounding localities who have used their ladder trucks for more than 20 years without major problems. This piece of apparatus costs approximately $500,000 each and prolonging its useful life will allow us to spend the same monies more wisely in updating the fleet of pumpers . The suggested 6 year life for ambulances is also questionable, depending on the station operating the unit. In some of the high volume stations, an ambulance could be worn out in 3 to 4 years. In other stations, the useful life might be 10 years. The Ad Hoc Committee recommends that the anticipated life cycle of the vehicle be one of several criteria considered by the aforementioned committee that will be charged with the replacement of vehicles as the budget allows. FUNDING FOR A VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM The Griffith report gave the foundation of a vehicle replacement program suggesting a capital expenditure of approximately one million dollars per year. This average does not include the anticipated $1,374,000 which will be spent by the volunteers to purchase their vehicular equipment of other ambulances, squads, utility vehicles over this same 11 year period nor the $1,162,800 value of equipment which life cycle extends beyond the 2005 model of the consultant. The Committee feels strongly that the County needs to establish a funding mechanism, estimated at $1 million per year, for the replacement of fire and rescue vehicles to allow the fleet to be maintained in a safe and modern condition. As the consultant pointed out, 52% of the existing fleet representing a value of $4.9 7 ~r i million will have passed their proposed life expectancy by 1995. The County has seen the impact of not providing a systematic replacement program in the area of school buses, police cars, and refuse trucks both from the stand point of capital outlay as well as on-going maintenance costs, so this type of commitment is necessary. FUTURE EFFORTS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE The other studies and efforts of the Ad Hoc Committee center around the topic of Staffing. During the budget work session between the Board of Supervisors and the Volunteer Fire and Rescue organizations, the need for staffing assistance to provide Advanced Life Support services during evening and weekend hours was presented by the Rescue Chiefs. Some monies were included in the budget to assist in this matter. Staff will assist in evaluating several methods including the scheduling of our existing staff, recruiting and retaining volunteers, and training assistance, as well as other methods which may have been successfully used by other departments. The volunteer recruiter position approved in the new budget has been posted and we hope to have someone on board by the end of the summer. Some concern has been raised about the working relationships between the volunteer organizations and the career staff and we will be addressing this concern as well. Much of the concern seems to be related to communications among the parties, the need for a single set of guidelines for operations and training, accountability for actions, allowing more input by the various organizations and the pride of the organization. Some of the changes which may be proposed by staff or the committee may not be universally accepted, but should be given in the spirit of trying to provide the appropriate level of service to the community in the most cost effective manner. 8 O~ POANp~,~ ti •~ p z c~ ~ 1838 ~+'~^'~'~~ ~~ FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT T.C. FUQUA CHIEF MEMORANDUM TO: Fire and Rescue Department Ad-Hoc Committee FROM: Chief T. qua DATE: July 5, 1 94 SUBJECT: Rescue 10 Vehicle Request Recently the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad (Rescue 10) made a request to the Board of Supervisors asking that they provide insurance for a car. The car is to be used in place of an ambulance attending meetings, training, etc. However, the Griffith study recommended the elimination of some utility vehicles from the fleet, the Board asked staff to coordinate with the Ad-Hoc committee to see if a unit could be shifted from another station to cure the problem. After review, the following recommendation is provided for consideration: There is one county owned sedan type vehicle currently assigned ~to this station and there is an additional vehicle that was donated to the volunteer fire department. Therefore, I would recommend transferring the management and control of the county owned vehicle to the rescue squad with the understanding that career personnel would be allowed to use as they currently do and the fire department be allowed to use it as long as it is approved by rescue officials. 3568 PETERS CREEK ROAD NW ROANOKE, VA 24019 (703) 561-8070 FAX TELEPHONE (703) 561-8108 ® Recyded Paper M E M O RAN D U M TO: T. C. Fuqua, Chief ~,~ FROM: R. L. Finney, Chief Company 3 SUBJECT: Report DATE: April 25, 1994 ~~~'~~ After reviewing the report from David M. Griffith, Associates, we at Company 3 would like to bring what we feel are deficiencies and inaccurate information to your attention. First, the expense of the report was exorbitant. Twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) to have a report done on our fire/rescue department fleet seems to us to be a misuse of taxpayer funds. We feel the entire report could have been completed by Roanoke County personnel using our data at far less cost and much higher accuracy. This report was completed in thirty (30) days, and alleges itself to be comprehensive in content. It's authors spent an average of one hour with two of our staff officers trying to gain knowledge of our apparatus and it's application. Using only this minimal information and with .no apparent previous knowledge of the fire service, wrote their proposal to realign our wagon-engine response system and to deactivate a specialized piece of apparatus, Foam 3, that is mission specific for a major fire threat in our first run territory. Namely, the tank farm on Starkey Road. The report's data on calls responded to by Foam 3 is also in error. Foam 3 responded to at least three incidents alone in Franklin County during the report period. It should also be noted that Foam 3 was purchased and refurbished at Company 3 expense. This report did not address our water supply problems in the county at all. Therefore, any suggestion to retire any tanker from any station has to be looked upon with destain and amazement. The report doesn't reflect the nature of our tactical response plan. The authors seem to be concerned only with numbers and not mission. We feel that there is no way this report can be implemented without a major effect on the fire suppression efforts of Roanoke County. If this report had been done by Roanoke County Fire personnel who know our response areas and threats, the justification for all our apparatus would be abundantly clear. Be it known that we do appreciate the effort put into this report. But, because of our aforementioned objections, we cannot support it, in whole or in part. MT. PLEASANT FIRST AID CREW INCORPORATED 2909 JAE VALLEY ROAD ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 BUSINESS 981-0979 EMERGENCY 911 -April 21, 1994 'Mr. Elmer Hodge Chief T. Fuqua Mr. Lee Eddy Mr. Harry Nickens Gentlemen: 'f'!.S mPm~`?r~= C:f the jvtf_.; Plc~capt Firc~ Aid ^rncr •..^_:,~. ~,?.l. paying citizens of the Mt. Pleasant community, we wish to reaffirm our stand point in writing concerning the fifteen year vehicle replacement plan. The residents of our community deserve to have the same quality and standard of rolling equipment as the higher affluent areas of Roanoke County. It is to our belief, we are all taxed from the same type of assessment an tax base. Therefore, all citizens no matter where the location, are entitled to equal services. This plan seems to reemphasize public opinion, the more rural the area, the poorer the municipal service provided. hTe, the members of the Mt. Pleasant First Aid Crew and the Mt. Pleasant Fire Department stand proud of our community, cur memL-ership in emergency services, quality of service we provide, and the reliability and appearance of the vehicles we respond in. If we allow this plan to become policy in our area, the citizens in the Mt. Pleasant community of Roanoke County will pay the price. The proven fact that a vehicle used for emergency service will not last forever is 1009 correct. The members of all local Fire Companies and Rescue Squads have said year after year, "If Roanoke County doesn't develop and carry gut a plan for replacing its rolling equipment. then someday all wit"' bE: '.•lO r:l C:ut ~::'~ i; ;?e.a.~ iep15C1,'ig at One time" 't Yic resul~s ~ii• this study carried out by David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. shows this will happen in 1995 to the amount of $4,946,400. It's ashamed we spent valuable tax dollars, no matter what the amount might be, to have a professional tell us what we already knew., The length of time a vehicle will last has allot to do wiL~ how the vehicle is used and taken care of. These vehicl'e~ are designed for patient care, not to joy ride cruising the town waiting on a call or running personal errands. This not We're There Because We Care J~~ PLFgs 9 ~ Z~ of UU. GV1( 9 ~~ 2V sTAlp CREW All Volunteer Organization ~~ «.~.~ .~ only adds unnessary mileage, but, wear and tear on the vehicle, increased maintenance cost and the increased possibility of being involved in an accident. We at Mt. Pleasant use our vehicles for what they were designed for; that is, patient care, training, and Crew business. The Mt. Pleasant First Aid Crew will not stand for the practices this plan proposes or .will we accept a vehicle that has been used, abused, and worn out by another station. With the implementation of this plan, Mt. Pleasant will never have quality equipment the community is accustomed to, only hand-me-downs from some other place. If a vehicle is worn out and not dependable enough to be placed in a high volume station and needs replacing, then why do we want a vehicle of this type to serve our community with? Does Roanoke County consider Mt. Pleasant to be an outcast .and its citizens a little less deserving? We expressed ourselves in this letter, but, I wonder how the residents of Mt. Pleasant will react when they find out they will~be deprived of these services? Our third run vehicle is used for transports, training, and as a back up unit for Mt. Pleasant. Unfortunately training and transports that are received through our station or its members do not show up in CAD and therefore the call data on this vehicle is incorrect. We will not have taken away a dependable vehicle that we've maintained and took care of and use, and have it placed in a station that first probably .wouldn't appreciate it and second wouldn't take care of it. When we start out on a call in a Mt. Pleasant vehicle, there's never a doubt in our mind we will not make it to the call, however, we may not return due to circumstances out of our control. By rotating vehicles from station to station will result in poorer care given by its user. The reason being, why worry about something that will passed on along after a while anyway.~•.This practice will result in a less dependable vehicle for everyone, and that's definitely not what this plan trying to accomplish. Our Squad Truck is another issue. In June 1991 I wrote a check to pay our percentage of that vehicle. This was over 50% of the cost of the vehicle and the equipment it carries. Squad 6 will remain stationed at Mt. Pleasant and will continue to serve our run area in its same capacity. Apparently the County of Roanoke and David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. do not value life and property as much as we do. Assuming the best possible reaction time, an additional ten to fifteen minutes of response time will be added to an incident. These times will vary depending on weather conditions, traffic ~- i •~onditions, and the time of day. We all know seconds can cost someone their life. We the members of Mt. Pleasant will not take that chance and the most astounding part of this plan is Roanoke County is willing to. In closing, the Mt. Pleasant First Aid Crew WILL NOT have their crash truck or third run ambulance taken away for any reason. Nor will we accept some other station's worn out unit to serve the Mt. Pleasant community with. Re ectfully, /~~:- '~~ Dennis Furrow -Chief cc: Board of Supervisors Mr. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Mr. Lee Eddy, Board Chairman Mr. Harry Nickens, Representative Mr. T.C. Fuqua, Chief; Fire and Rescue Department `~-1 WE SERVE YOU PROUDLY 2909 JAE VALLEY ROAD, S.E. June 30, 1994 Chief Randy Wimmer Roanoke County Vol. F.D. No 8 P. 0. Box 171 Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Attention: Ad Hoc' Committee Chairman, All Committee Members Ladies and Gentlemen: EMERGENC CALL: 911 ROANOKE, VA. 24014 Please forgive the tardiness of this letter, but sometimes its better to think about all aspects of a matter than just dive in with a hasty decision. First, allow us to state our position on the surveys conducted by the David M. Griffith & Associates. The Mount Pleasant Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., is in no way in agreement with any aspect of this Document; the reason being those who prepared this Document have no idea what the needs are of Roanoke County as far as fire suppression. They have no idea of what rural fire fighting is about or what it is to work a major fire without the resources of a main water supply, meaning high volume hydrants. If it be the charge of this Committee to redo the Roanoke County Fire Depart- ment, to make it a more economical Department, let us•consider the following suggestions. STANDARDIZING OF VEHICLES Engines, wagons, tankers, ladder trucks, platforms and brush trucks should be of a standard design. The Volunteer Chiefs Board and Career Chiefs would write specifications jointly for a standard vehicle, leaving or enhancing all safety measures. All pumps, pump panels, tools, equipment, hose would fit this standard, through-out the County regardless of Lease, Lease/Purchase or outright Purchase. The "standard" is the rule. Any deviation from that standard would be any enhancement desired by the Volunteer Company where the truck is to be stationed. This would be paid for by the Volunteers. This way the Volunteers can hold fast to their individual identity. The specifications for the "standard" truck should be so designed as to make refurbishment of the truck easy on "turn around" and economical for the County• WE ERVE YOU PROUDLY ..w.w~R:W.cNw4....a~a... ~ f ._ . .._.- . .. ~„~ ~ _ ~~~_ ~ - - ~. ..~. _, ~.l~Ito ~Ple~~ant dol. Fire De ~o P ~- i EMERGENCY CALL: 911 2909 JAE VALLEY ROAD, S.E. ROANOKE, VA. 24014 June 30, 1994 (Page 2) STAFF VEHICLES Staff vehicles should be sedans with specifications the same as Police Cruisers. They should all be painted in the colors of the Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department and carry identification decals and seals and Roanoke County Government license tags. The only separation from this "standard" would be Chief Tommy Fuqua's car, the Fire Marshall car and the Fire Inspectors cars. `~ These cars should be white in color and should contain the same radios and ,,)~ electronic equipment. Allow me to expound on this. In response to Deputy V Chief Mark Lights reasoning to put heavy duty, four wheel drive vehicles to staff (meaning Command one, Command two, Deputy Chief lA and 1B, the Training Officer and Spport one and two) to pull trailers. Our response to this is very simple. There is now in all stations in Roanoke County, heavy duty, four wheel drive vehicles to pull trailers. We have brush trucks, utilities and suburbans. The only thing needed is to ascertain which station will house the trailers and respond them on call. This ~ Committee and Staff seems to have forgotten there still exists a pair of v products called snow tires and chains. I'm sure the County Police do just fine 5~J) Q with both. Yes'. sooner or later we are going to have to replace a four wheel drive vehicle, but not in the manner or time frame suggested by the David M. Griffith & Associates report. '~llow us to briefly address the Virginia Tech survey as a ways and means to draw the paid staff and the volunteers together. There now exists two different Fire Departments with the same goal in front of them, protection of life and property. But thats the only thing we have in common at this moment. No, I'm not putting the career personnel at fault, we also share some blame. But let me bring to light a few things for your consideration. Three times our Volunteer Representative to the Chiefs Board has requested of Chief Fuqua that when new product evaluations are to be made on shoes, shirts, coats, pants, etc., we (the volunteers) be allowed to test the gear along side the staff, after all we work or are on call three times as much as staff. We have never had the courtesy of a yes or no answer yet. When "hepatitis B" was a big concern in Roanoke County, everybody who needed shots got them..... except the volunteers. We were the last to receive shots and we have Supervisor Harry Nikens to thank for our getting the shots, without paying for them ourselves. '"~b 1 WE ERVE YOU PROUDLY EMERGENCY CALL: 911 2909 JAE VALLEY ROAD, S.E. ROANOKE, VA. 24014 June 30, 1994 (Page 3) Is there a rift between most career and volunteer personnel.......yes: But its nothing that couldn't be overcome with concerned, pro-active leadership and good responsive conversation on both sides. Sorry Ladies and Gentlemen, but I don't think that will come about, because the ingredients aren't there. The Mount Pleasant Fire Department requests that this letter be read aloud at the next Ad-Hoc Committee Meeting and entered into the minutes of that meeting. Cordially, - MT PLEASANT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT., INC. . ~ ~ ~, > -P-e~ Colin W. Gee, Asst. Chief CC: Roanoke County Administrator, Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Supervisor, Harry Nikens Chief Tommy Fuqua Chairman: Volunteer Chief Board ~~ -.r~~,,;.~' BENT MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT :~~'~1A ,,}_~ '~ ROANOKE COUNTY COMPANY 8 ~ 1~ I~ Drawer D ^~` •~,,5;~,~*,' Bent Mountain Vir inia 24059 vim' g ~~ ` '~ Business 929-4555 Emergency 911 Emergency 929-4288 ~, r TO: Chief T. C. Fugua FROM: Chief Randy Wimmer SUBJECT: Vehicle Survey DATE: April 26, 1994 We the officers of Company 8 met to discuss this issue on April 20, 1994, here are our comments concerning ' this issue. •' 1. The utility vehicles that were recommended to be purchased-or replaced by the companys. We feel that this vehicle is a very valuable piece of equipment of our company and community due to setting up water supply operations .and by no means can we afford to pruchase any such equipment. If this vehicle was used only to transport members then maybe we could understand this recommendation. 2. Purchasing of new vehicles would only be placed in high run stations. WE feel this issue will hurt the members-of our station and other stations due to the fact that we feel that volunteer members•look for- ward to operating a new piece of~equipment its kind of like a moral booster. Take for example when we recieved our wagon in 1987 it was like heaven made over again, that was the first new pumper we had ever recieved in 36 years of service. 3. Squad responding from another station. The squad from Rescue 8 is also a valuable piece of the depart- ment in additional lighting, generators and small tools. We feel that if a squad has to come from another station this could hamper our operation on the scene. ~~ ' ~ BENT MOUNTAIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT .~ , ~,,, ;7:" ~ :~F~ ?~ ROANOKE COUNTY COMPANY 8 (• ,,,s~ ,,~ Drawer D ~~•~ '`' ~"~ ;~ Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 4~~ Business 929-4555 Emergency 911 Emergency 929-4288 ~. ~* 4. Replacing staff vehicles. We notice in the survey that a lot of 4-WD vehicles were asked for to re- place certain vehicles. We feel that this is a very expensive transportation due to the fuel consumption and maintenance cost. GENERAL COMMENTS: We feel that this survey was not needed. We have people in our system that are capable of conducting a survey of this type. Battallion Chief_Ron Edwards and company chiefs should have enough knowledge to prepare a replacement plan. Also we feel if this survey is supported by the board of supervisors will it be supportted 10 years form now? 2~ MoU~~ m Z BENT IUI®IJNTAIN FIRS' AI® AN® RESCUE CREW, INC. Drawer B Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 r.~•a ~~ Business 929-4555 Emergency 911 Emergency 929-4288 9S.T A 1D GQ. April 21, 1994 Chief Tommy Fuqua Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department 3568 Peters Creek Road Roanoke VA 24019 Dear Chief Fuqua: Overall, I feel this study was a waste of the $10,000 plus dollars paid by Roanoke County. If this study did truly reflect the views of the Rescue Chiefs and Fire Chiefs, why could we not get together in a joint meeting and discuss it. It may have meant another meeting or two, but would have saved the tax payers a lot of money. However, I don't feel this report gives a good view of what the other Chiefs chink. Either that or my thinking is so far from "the norm" that maybe I should consider another job. This study is too w~shy,~washy and contradicts itself too much for me to feel it was done professionally. Maybe they just knew who signed their check. Some stations and office personnel came out smelling like roses and some stations took a very insulting slap to the face. Tommy, the County has always expected nothing short of perfection from this crec~~. I feel we have come as close to that as reasonably possible. We have 8 cardiacs and/or paramedics, equal to all other stations combined with the exception of rescue 3. We.have 3 pretty well maintained units which are very well stocked. A great squad which I will put up against the rest of the squads, including the "monsters", avid we try to get all of our work the county requests back to them on a timely basis. Why are we always the scape goat of the county. Sure we don't run the volume, but we don't have the number of people in the community that other crews do. We have saved and spent money wisely and encouraged the community to stand behind us and join us. If you look dollar for dollar and person to person, some crews like 5 and 9 should have hundreds of thousands of dollars and 100's of people in their organizations. All we 'are asking for is our fair share and respect that I feel the members of this organization and community so richly deserve. Sincerely, ~~,~ Teddy D. Croc~ie Rescue Chief ~i~ o (/~, w~~ '9 m Z ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ® STAID ~'~/' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: E3EIVT ~J®lJf'~TAIN FIRST Ai® AR~® ~ESCIlE CRE~1/, INC. Drawer B Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 ~. Business 929-4555 Emergency 911 Emergency 929-4288 C1~. i e f Tommy Fuqua Rescue Chief Teddy Crowe ~~- April 21, 1994 Fire and Rescue Fleet Study Per your request, I am submitting comments and suggestions from the Fire and Rescue fleet study. I have discussed this survey in depth with some of ~:; officers and our feelings are listed below. If you have any questions concerning these issues, please contact me. To simplify our responses, I have indicated the page numbers we have concern~~with and our concern with those items. Page 16 "One unit at station 8 and 10 as surplus vehicles". I do not feel it would be fair for us to have to store and m~irltain this unit for the rest of the county and then ma a arrangements to get this unit to whichever station ne::ded it. Even if it would not cause us a financial b~.:?-;yen, assuming the county picked up the cost of all meJical supplies, we would be spending countless hours cl::aning, stocking and unstocking the unit. Page 16 "Lata shows a significant demand in the response area of #il". (1) At 128 calls, they call this significant en~~ugh for 1 unit although they have only 1 ALS person. (2) Don't just go 1/2 way on staffing of a station. Common sense tells anybody with experience in this field tl-:at. on an auto accident with two victims, you need two units. Why start draining other units from neighboring stations on a single vehicle accident. Page 17 "Chart" Rescue 8 only had eleven times in which 2 irir_idents were happening at the same time for 1993 and at no time were there three incidents happening at the some time. However, at any given time, we could get that third call. Now, we can handle this situation, if This would allow low volume stations to use the unit for a period and then transfer it to a high volume stationk~ still as a fairly new unit with low mileage. Replacement of units should be done fairly with each station, realizing that stations such as 6, 8 and 10 would not receive rie'w units on the same schedule as the busier stations of 2, 3 and 5 because of the mileage, wear and tear of the vehicles. Page 21 "Advantages of Standardization". (1) Allows for es~~ablished maintenance routines - every vehicle has routine maintenance such as oil change, belts, fluid, etc. (2) Reduces operation and maintenance cost through volume maintenance contract - A vehicle warranty is only good for 100,000 through Ford. Carilion Transportation Services is not given any discount for buying all Southern or Medtech ambulances. (3) Fire and Rescue workers become familiar with all units -Vehicles change from year to ,year. The only way you can get two identical units is to order all at the same time. Let's face facts that the only way a stranger can learn a truck or unit is to take 15 or 20 minutes before his shift and check the truck off. (4) Fleet discount or state bid - You get what you pay for! Page 23 I ao agree the volunteer maintenance records could be ke~~t better. However, I don't see the problem of a vclunte~r (or~a career person) doing routine maintenance th:~m~elves. Page 23 "R-commendation we undergo a semi-annual evaluation". If we meet state guidelines and inspections, this should be. sufficient enough. Page 24 $75,000 per unit for an unstocked unit should be a very nice unit. Page 24 "Lack of county ownership doesn't give county control". Is this really a problem? See Paragraph 7 of this document. Page 24 "County own front line". Our people on the mountain are ncL- good enough to have new equipment, the amount of trucks they are use to, or a squad, but you will gladly take those trucks bought with their money and protect others...interesting. As far as crunching the numbers incorporated in the rest of the study, I don't feel I can comment on this part because I have neither the tune or the resources to verify these figures. I feel like I have e::pressed myself honestly and with the best interest of the Bent Mountain Rescue Squad and community in mind. ~~ this fleet study is implemented, we cannot. It may not seem important now, unless it is your wife or child. If Rescue 8 were reduced to 2 "front line" ambulances and both of these ambulances were on a same vehicle accident with 2 injuries, the station would be emptied and those it times we had 2 simultaneous calls, would be very significant. Page 18 "Review use of Squad 6 and 8". Speaking on behalf of Rescue 8, we feel this is the most disturbing suggestion in this report. We would not want to tell the patient wh•~ is trapped in the metal of a wrecked car that the county is trying to save a few dollars so we are having to wait for a squad from Rescue 3 or even farther away before this person can be extricated. As stated on page 17, Rescue 3 is subject on numerous occasions to have two or three calls at one time, to us, this would put an extra burden on Cave Spring to respond a squad and at times not be able to due to their own call volume. Also, as this report states, Bent Mountain is "isolated", which means we have long distance responses as well as very narrow roads to travel on. We feel that a squad any bigger than our current unit would not serve the citizens that we protect. Bent Mountain Rescue is proud of its members and equipment. Squad 8 has eq~iipment that no other squad in the county has, not to mention the fact that our members are highly trained in vehicle extrication. Vehicle extrication instructors have commented on the quality and quantity of equipment on Squad 8. It is safe in saying that Bent Mountain Rescue WILL NOT give up this squad truck. Page 20 "Standardization of the fleet". (1) This will not reduce cost, it will increase cost. If all units were speed out with 4 wheel drive, which rescue 8 and rescue 10 :fired a lot more than rescue 5 for example, there will be excess wear and tear on the more expensive 4 wheel drive unit. (2) Some crews prefer vans and some prefer boxes. All of which depends on terrain and personnel preference. (3) It is ever increasing that the volunteer feels his hands are tied and he is just a person who is to devote all his spare time to train, run calls and never has a say in what goes on. Taking away a wish list of what his unit will have on it that he'll spend so much of his time in is just another way of sa-~ing we don't care about you. Page 20 "Rotation of vehicles." I realize that for rescues 2, 3 and 5, this is a great option. However, I don't think it is fair at all. I don't want anybody's 10 year old hand me down that has been put through the ringer. If they still feel it is a good idea, maybe we should suggest giving the low volume crews the new units and then rotating them up to the higher volume stations. MEMORANDUM T0: Chief Fuqua FROM: Woody Henderson, Chief Fort Lewis V"ol. Fire Dept. DATE: April 19, 1994 SUBJECT: Fleet Size Deployment and Replacement Plan As you are aware DMG stated that T 9 should be eliminated from the fleet. This was because it was under utilized. If you were to remove T 9 from service along with T 4 that would mean that the North side of the county would be with only T 10. I don't know where these people came up with this idea but the nearest tanker to us is at least a ten minute response to station 9. There is another thirteen minutes to the dead end of Cove Hollow. We do not have the advantage of having another Fire Station close by like some of the other stations. Salem is closer than any county station but they do not have a tanker either. To better utilize T y it should be running first due with Company 4 and 1G because of the four thousand gallons of water and no hydrants in the area. The report stated that they talked to several other fire Chiefs and career Capts. I don't think the other chiefs have the right to speak for our department nor does more than one or two of the career captains. T 9 should be replaced in a few years but not eliminated unless the county can afford to put hydrants throughout the entire area or respond other tankers from across the county. The report also suggested that H/M 1 be moved to Station 9 to make room for E 10 to be moved to Station 5. This truck will do nothing but set and collect dust at Co. 9 unless the county has some other uses for the truck. On page 4 of the Vehicle / Equipment Replacement Flan ( Schedule A ) it suggest that A 9 be replaced in the year 2001 the truck has about one or two years left in it. We agree with the vehicle rotation plan and most of the other suggestions. I have made some comments on the report itself.• At no time did anyone from DN1G talk to me or anyone else from Co. 9. I don't feel this was right or fair. Resp~ ivel~~~ G~~ ~ of tidy Henderson FLVFD CO. 9 ~~ READ MOUNTAIN FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT Company 12 4505 East Park Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (703) 561-8117 ~~~ TO: Chief Tommy Fuqua FROM: Chief Garry Rock DATE: May 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Truck Replacement Plan In reference to the the truck replacement plan done by the David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. , I have a few comments to make regarding Company 12. First and most importanly, is the addition of a second pumper to station 12. With the number" of calls we are running out of station 12, there are numerous times that we could get out a second truck. Also, by station 12 having a second truck to run, it would cut down on the number of runs by adjoining stations, such as when we have to go to Hollins for a structure fire or fire alarm and Vinton is dispatched or just the opposite for Vinton calls. By station 12 having the second truck, the pumpers in stations 5 and 2 would get less miles put on them, thus increasing their useful life cycle. Also, by having a second pumper, whenever one of the trucks has to go in the shop for repairs or maintenance, we would still have a class A pumper to run calls with instead of being left with the reserve engine, which is not as class A pumper. I'm not asking for Roanoke County to put a new truck in the station yet, because Wagon 12 is still a good first run truck. What I propose is to take one of the existing pumpers that is in a high run station and repacing it with a new truck and moving the old one to station 12. This would do three things, put a new truck in a station that needs it, give station 12 a second truck, and extend the life of existing trucks. 1 FORM: 001 1/1192 The second item I would like to address is the addition of a rescue unit to station 12. At the present time, we are looking into the veasability of adding ,. rescue to our operation. As you know, we currently run a first responder program out of station 12. This seems to be working very well and at this time, that is the way we would like to leave it. The membership does not feel comfortable with adding transport to our operation and does feel like we could man a rescue unit at this time. I will tell you that that are a few people that do want a transport agency in the area, this includes current members of station 12 and people in the community. It has been stated that they may approach the two counties to try to get a rescue started that would be separate from station 12. The members of station 12 would support this if it comes about. The last item I would like to discuss is the replacement of Utility 12. Being that this truck is a 1971, I feel that it has long lived past its usefull life. But with the way we run our operation, we cannot do without it. Since the report suggest to replace staff vehicles first and moving the old ones into the stations, I would support this, if station 12 could get one of the first staff vehicles. These are the most important issues that I wanted to address from the report. I hope these comments will be of some use to you in this matter. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me any time. 2 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ ,~_~.~. AGENDA NO. APPE CE REQUEST ' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~~'IC ~~~~~~~ ~L - ~l ((! `I f _SC ~(~'~- j~ ~~"~ ~~i` __ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco ize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY AME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between t ee to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or epresentative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the nu ber of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless in ucted by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a resentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification m be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be dir ted to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience m tiers is not allowed. = : - ^ Both speakers and th audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - - ^ Speakers are reque ted to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. : ^ INDIVIDUALS PEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE TH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING E INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE RINT LEGIBLY AND G IVE TO THE CLERK c _ c NAME ~~ ~ ~ ~1 r~ ~ ~GL~'I ~ ~Gi,-~'~ ADDRESS ~t-~ct~-~ ~~, C~~,~~15 Ck~ ~`~ ~ ~~ ~ (~ PHONE _ `£~_ ~ ~' Lv l ~~~ _~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Work Session with School Board on School Capital Improvement Program SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the information for the School Capital Improvement Program work session to be held with the Superintendent and the School Board. As you can see, it is quite detailed. County and School staff have worked together many hours to provide this for you and Dr. Gordon is to be commended for the approach she has taken. While there are refinements that could be made to the format, it is a great start. At this point, we are submitting to you the overall capital needs of the County Schools. Please remember that there are other needs, including personnel and salaries, which must also be addressed. When we decide whether to have a bond issue and what to include in it if we do, we will prepare a financial plan. Diane Hyatt, Finance Director, has determined that there is insufficient dropoff in debt service to absorb a bond issue of any amount. Whatever we do will require increases in revenue sources of some kind. I am convinced that these improvements need to be made. As such, I prefer several, reasonably sized bond issues rather than one very large one in three years. An issue of $15-20 million has a smoother financial impact and is more manageable to construct than one large issue of $30-40 million. Interest rates appear to be rising, which could also be a consideration. I am not yet prepared to recommend which items might be included. Those are decisions to be worked out with the full Board, the School Board and School administration. Mr. Minnix will not be present at this work session so I suggest that we have a general work discussion and schedule a special work session early in August to make a final decision. Financing alternatives can be presented at that time. i Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Roanoke County Schools /~ 38 ~ ~~~~ ~ ..oo~ ~~ ~ t ~~~~~~~ F~ ~~~~ Capital Improvement Plan 1994 - 2004 Working Document July 26,1994 ~~ '21 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................... 1 Calendar for Possible Fall 1994 Referendum ....................... 4 Status of School Board Capital Projects .. ....................... 5 Roanoke County Schools by District .............................. 7 Enrollment Projections ........................................ 8 Capital Improvement Plan ..................................... 40 South County Cave Spring High School ............................... 41 Cave Spring Junior High School .......................... 42 Hidden Valley Junior High School ....................... . 43 Back Creek Elementary ................................. 44 Bent Mountain Elementary ............................... 45 Cave Spring Elementary ................................ 46 Clearbrook Elementary ................................. 47 Green Valley Elementary ................................ 48 Oak Grove Elementary ................................. 49 Penn Forest Elementary ................................ 50 North County Northside High School .................................. 51 Northside Junior High .................................. 52 Burlington Elementary .................................. 53 Glen Cove Elementary ................................. 54 Mason's Cove Elementary ............................... 55 Mountain View Elementary .............................. 56 West County Glenvar High School ................................... 57 Glenvar Middle School ................................. 58 Fort Lewis Elementary ................................. 59 Glenvar Elementary ................................... 60 East County William Byrd High School ............................... 61 William Byrd Middle School .............................. 62 Herman L. Horn Elementary ............................. 63 Mount Pleasant Elementary .............................. 64 Roland E. Cook Elementary .............................. 65 W. E. Cundiff Elementary ............................... 66 Other Buildings Arnold R.Burton ...................................... 67 Roanoke County Career Center ........................... 68 Various School Buildings ................................ 69 Land Recap of Land Needs .................................. 70 Vehicle Replacement School Bus Fleet ..................................... 71 Maintenance and Warehouse Vehicles ...................... 72 Instructional Equipment .................................... 73 Review of Southwest County Facility Utilization ...................... 82 Public School Building Cost .................... ............... 88 WORKSESSION WITH BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND SCHOOL BOARD JULY 26, 1994 BACKGROUND The Board of Supervisors has asked for a work session with the School Board on a Capital Improvement Program, with particular emphasis on the need for a new high school in the Southwest County area, and additional athletic facilities at Northside High School. The Supervisors have also requested funding alternatives, and recommendations concerning a possible bond referendum in November, 1994. This document includes information on school population projections, the physical needs of the various school buildings, and possible capital projects in the form of renovations, additions and new construction. INTRODUCTION The Roanoke County School system faces a variety of current and near-future capital improvement projects to keep school facilities at an acceptable, safe level. The issues include overcrowding, security and safety of students, response to federal and state mandates, maintenance of buildings and grounds, air conditioning, improved athletic facilities, and new technology. The material which is presented here represents a proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1994-2004 for input from the School Board and the Board of Supervisors. Also included is a calendar for a proposed Bond Referendum. The projects which are presented here represent the total anticipated needs for the next ten years. These items still need to be prioritized, and funding sources should be identified. Overcrowdine Overcrowding issues in the various schools are not necessarily due to growth in school-age population; in fact, even with reduction in numbers of students in some schools, the buildings are still at capacity. With reduced student-teacher ratios, computer laboratories, addressing of special education needs within the individual buildings and related technological and educational advances, schools which were adequate when they were built may not serve the same number of students today. Some of these problems can be addressed with re-districting of school attendance areas, while others require additions and new construction in the foreseeable future. Additionally, some areas, particularly Southwest County, have experienced recent growth, and will continue to do so as development in the Cotton Hill area takes place. 1 Land Issues Six of the schools which require renovations or additions will also require additional land for these facilities. That information is included in here also. Teacher Salaries There has been recent discussion concerning how teacher salaries in the Roanoke County School System compare to the national average. While this is not information directly related to a Capital Improvement Program, certainly the cost of keeping salaries competitive must be considered along with the physical needs of the schools. The excellence of our School System has always, and will continue to be, based on a combination of the personnel and the facilities. 3 ~z z~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ $~8~~~8~ ~~8~~~888~~ 8~~ j ~ooo~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ 88 8.88. $ : s $ ~~o~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 8g o8~$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8, 8 8 8 8 p 8 erg( ~gN{ 8 8 8 da 8 da ''~®,®"" ~ O aD dD ~ O O O O ~ O V ~N 8588$ 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~~g~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.~~ ~ ~<~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ss~s~sg$sss ~s~-~gs s~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~ ~ ~, a > ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 5 Roanoke County Schools by Dlstrlct South County Cave Spring High Cave Spring Junior Hidden Valley Junior Back Creek Bent Mountain Cave Spring Clearbrook Green Valley Oak Grove Penn Forest North County Northside High Northside Junior Burlington Glen Cove Mason's Cove Mountain View West County Glenvar High Glenvar Middle Fort Lewis Glenvar East County William Byrd High William Byrd Middle Herman L. Horn Mount Pleasant Roland E. Cook W.E. Cundiff Other Schools Arnold R. Burton Roanoke County Career Center School Board Administration Center (former RCOS) 07/22/94 cip/DISTRICT.WK4 w C~ 4~ •,~ w 0~ ti O ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOLS STUDENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS 1994-2003 The following tables were compiled by Lloyd Parsell (Roanoke County Schools) and Janet Scheid (Roanoke County Planning and Development Department). Organizational structures are based on K-5, 6-8 and 9-12. Calculations were made from projected enrollments as of June 29, 1994, and known projected housing developments as of July 20, 1994. Any housing developments not known by the Planning Department that may be constructed in the next ten years have not been considered. The average projected population growth for Roanoke County was so small (.005) it made such an insignificant difference that we did not factor it in our calculations. Fairfax County Department of Planning conducted a statewide study in 1987 to develop factors for projecting student populations from new housing units. These factors were used in projecting the attached enrollments, and they are as follows: High School Housing Units x .20 Middle School Housing Units x .08 Elementary School Housing Units x .25 The base kindergarten enrollment for 1994-95 is based on actual student registrations as of June 29. If these enrollments are different when school opens, the projections would change accordingly. SE Self-contained special education. 8 CAVT SPRING HIGH SCHOOL 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 490 410 385 14 1299 1984-85 469 483 383 16 1351 1985-86 483 473 487 12 1455 1986-87 479 482 482 15 1458 1987-88 441 446 465 28 1380 1988-89 395 384 430 36 1245 1989-90 415 382 382 36 1215 1990-91 365 382 362 34 1143 1991-92 399 353 381 36 1169 1992-93 402 382 338 42 1164 1993-94 377 382 389 32 1180 1994-95 '401 426 379 389- 32 1627 1995-96 406 407 432 385 32 '" 1662 1996-97 430 412 413 438 32 1725 1997-98 4p3 436 418 419 32 1708 1998-99 441 409 442 424 32_ 1748 1999-2000 435 447 415 448 32 1777 2000-01 433 435 447 415 32 1762,.- 2001-02 419 433 435 447 32 1766 2002-03 424 419 433 435 32 1743 2003-04 394 424 4.19 433 - 32 1702 1983-1993 -100 *Assumptions 1) 540 new housing units in next 5 years 2) 108 new housing units/year 3) .20 high school children/unit 108 x .20 = 22 children 4) 6 children/year/grade 5) addition of 9th grade 10 HIDDEN VALLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 6 7 8 9 SE T 1983-84 211 246 235 228 24 944 1984-85 173 206 254 241 27 901 1985-86 158 188 212 246 24 828 1986-87 165 166 204 194 28 757 1987-88 154 166 170 186 38 714 1988-89 164 149 171 175 31 690 1989-90 174 172 153 172 31 702 1990-91 158 172 176 153 45 704 1991-92 199 156 174 164 36 731 1992-93 171 202 173 164 35 745 1993-94 170 184 198 176 40 768 1994-95 194 175 191 47 607'' 1.995-96 210 194 175 47 626' 1996-97 200 210 194 47 651 1997-98 204 200 210 47 661 1998-99 178 204 200 47 629 1999-2000 195 178 204... 47 624 2000-01 169 195 178 _47 589 2001-02 169 169 195 47 58p 2002-03 134 169 i69 47 519 2003-04 134 134 169 47 4$4- 1983-1993 -19% *Assumption 1) 9th grade to high school 12 RENT MOUNTAIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 SE T 1983-84 9 14 6 10 3 11 53 1984-85 7 6 13 6 11 3 46 1985-86 12 8 7 12 6 7 52 1986-87 23 4 15 8 5 17 72 1987-88 14 17 6 15 9 6 67 1988-89 14 16 5 12 7 54 1989-90 14 8 12 16 8 58 1990-91 17 15 6 13 16 10 77 1991-92 11 18 13 5 11 16 74 1992-93 8 14 16 13 6 12 69 1993-94 8 12 13 16 17 8 3 77 1994-95 14 7 _9 ~4 X6 16 6 82 1995-96 14 14 7 ' 14 16 1'6 6 87'' 1996-97 14 14 14 7 14 I.6 6 $5 1997-98 14 14 14 14 7 I4 6 $3 1998-99 14 14 14 14 14 7 6 83 1999-2000 14 14 14 14 L4 1.4 6 90 2000-01 14 14 14 14 -14 14 6 90 2001-02 15 15 14 14 14 14 6 92 2002-03 15 15 15 14 14 14 6 93 2003-04 15 15 15 15 14 14 6 94 1983-1993 +45% 14 CLEARBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 15 17 19 15 21 23 23 2 135 1984-85 21 15 15 24 16 20 24 2 137 1985-86 14 20 11 18 23 15 20 2 123 1986-87 20 15 20 13 17 24 14 1 124 1987-88 22 22 15 17 13 15 24 128 1988-89 22 19 19 17 17 11 9 11 125 1989-90 27 19 21 15 15 12 12 121 1990-91 25 30 20 18 14 16 12 135 1991-92 16 26 23 18 18 13 14 128 1992-93 19 15 26 19 17 18 12 126 1993-94 21 18 10 22 17 17 11 116 1994-95 17 20 I9 13 21 I9 ' 15 124 1995-96 I7 I7 20 19 13 21 15 I22 1996-97 I7 17 17 20 19 13 I5 lI8 1997-98 17 17 I7 17 20 I9 I5 122 1998-99 17 17 I7 17 17 20 I5' 120 1999-2000 17 17 I7 17 17 17 15 117 2000-O1 18 17 17 17 17 17 15 I18 2001-02 I8 I8 17 17 17 17 15 II9 2002-03 18 18 18 17 I7 17 15 120 2003-04 18 18 I8 18 17 17 15 121 1949-l~1g3 -Y°Ia 1983-1993 -14% 16 OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 SE T 1983-84 76 82 56 74 68 80 9 445 1984-85 81 74 75 58 83 66 11 448 1985-86 81 74 82 69 61 85 6 458 1986-87 78 80 72 90 78 59 1 458 1987-88 83 75 79 72 94 76 4 483 1988-89 85 72 74 76 75 86 7 475 1989-90 90 88 83 79 73 87 5 505 1990-91 83 94 84 82 76 82 2 503 1991-92 80 79 92 86 78 72 4 491 1992-93 80 90 89 98 91 78 8 534 1993-94 78 72 89 94 98 81 14 526 1994-95 77 92 76 92 92 1Q0 I4 543 1995-96 77 77 92 76 92 `92' 14 520 1996-97 78 77 77 92 7b 92 14 -506 1.997-98 78 78 77 77 92 76 14 492 1998-99 79 78 78 77 77 92 14 495 1999-2000 79 79 78 78 77 77 14 482 2000-01 79 79 79 78 7$ 77 14 484 2001-02 80 79 79 79 78 78 14 487 2002-03 80 80 79 79 79 78 14 489 2003-04 81 80 80 79 79 79 14 492 1983-1993 +180 18 WEST COUNTY TOTAL 1983-84 1355 1984-85 1363 1985-86 1337 1986-87 1333 1987-88 1329 1988-89 1270 1989-90 1245 1990-91 1262 1991-92 1280 1992-93 1283 1993-94 1270 1994-95, 1262 1995-96 1241 1996-97 1210 1997-98 1228 1998-99 1221 1999-2000 1185 2000-01 1181 2001-02 1161 2002-03 1157 2003-04 1133 1983-1993 -~6$ ~' 6~0 20 GLENVAR MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 112 147 120 116 114 78 704 1984-85 112 117 162 110 114 106 721 1985-86 100 118 127 143 99 110 697 1986-87 114 112 104 114 138 98 680 1987-88 115 124 103 111 111 137 702 1988-89 99 127 105 111 103 115 660 1989-90 89 92 114 89 105 105 21 615 1990-91 87 95 91 110 98 100 22 603 1991-92 75 95 97 91 105 97 31 591 1992-93 100 74 94 99 90 104 34 595 1993-94 100 102 72 102 95 100 29 600 1994-95 103 95 105. 16 319. 1995-96 89 103 95 16 303 1996-97 106 89 103 16 298 1997-98 77 106 89 16 288 1998-99 87 77 106 16 286 1999-200.0 82 86 77 16 261 2000-O1 80 91 86 16 273 2001-02 81 80 91 16 268 2002-03 81 81 80 16 258 2003-04 81 81 81 16 259 1983-1993 -150 22 GLENVAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 67 57 51 79 71 75 79 7 486 1984-85 54 67 60 54 87 71 79 10 482 1985-86 71 47 65 56 67 80 81 7 474 1986-87 84 58 57 68 55 71 86 13 492 1987-88 68 63 61 56 72 58 68 17 463 1988-89 69 54 63 61 57 75 58 17 454 1989-90 66 68 53 65 69 53 74 16 464 1990-91 82 55 72 58 69 68 50 22 476 1991-92 67 83 54 78 58 68 65 19 492 1992-93 63 67 79 60 77 65 66 19 496 1993-94 64 59 63 72 62 76 69 20 485 1994-95 51 62 64 54 74 60 20 385 1995-96 51 51 62 64 54 74 20' 376 1996-97 51 51 51 62 64 54 20 3.53 1997-98 51 51 51 51 63 65 20 352 1998-99 52 51 51 51 52 63 20 340 1999-2000 52 52 51 51 52 52 20 330 2000-01 52 52 52 51 51 52 20 330 2001-02 52 52 52 53 52 52 20 333 2002-03 53 52 52 53 53 52 20 33.5 2003-04 53 53 52 52 53 53 20 336 1983-1993 -00.20 *Assumption 1) 6th grade to Glenvar Middle School 24 NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 320 262 268 9 859 1984-85 343 288 233 10 874 1985-86 366 318 292 8 984 1986-87 312 332 321 8 973 1987-88 292 282 326 10 910 1988-89 321 280 269 12 882 1989-90 267 298 265 7 837 1990-91 300 247 292 6 845 1991-92 265 256 241 41 803 1992-93 259 245 259 48 811 1993-94 244 245 251 68 808 1994-95 225 271 236' 227 108 1067 1995-96 259 225 .271 236 108 1099 1996-97 263 259 225 271 108 1126 1997-98 263 263 259 225 108 1118 1998-99 243 263 263 259 108 1136. 1999-2000 225 243 263 263 108 1102 2000-01 245 222 243 263 108 1081 2001-02 257 245 222 243 108 1075 2002-03 22$ 257 245 222 108 1060 2003-04 234 228 257 245 108 1072 1983-1993 -6% 26 BURLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 48 53 46 58 50 55 68 11 389 1984-85 56 46 52 50 57 55 54 11 381 1985-86 47 56 42 50 53 60 55 8 371 1986-87 49 53 60 43 48 51 57 8 369 1987-88 35 61 45 57 43 47 50 7 345 1988-89 65 40 66 40 58 45 45 10 369 1989-90 54 66 51 69 51 55 47 15 408 1990-91 63 60 64 50 69 48 59 20 433 1991-92 64 58 57 58 49 71 51 13 421 1992-93 56 67 57 56 64 44 73 18 435 1993-94 41 58 68 51 56 63 42 14 393 1994-95 60 45 51 67 50 _49 29 351 1995-96 60 65 50 56 72 >55 29 387 1996-97 60 60 65 50 56 -72 29 .392 1997-98 60 60 60 65 50 56 29 380 199.8-99 61 60 60 60 65 50 29 385 1999-2000 61 61 60 60 60 65 29 396 2000-01 61 61 61 60 60 60 29 392 2001-02 62 61 61 61 60 60 29 394 2002-03 62 62 61 61 61 60 29 396 2003-04 62 62 62 61 61 61 29 398 1983-1993 +lo 28 MASON'S COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 36 40 43 33 29 46 44 271 1984-85 35 33 43 44 37 30 44 6 272 1985-86 43 42 35 38 41 36 32 4 271 1986-87 36 45 45 34 42 38 34 6 280 1987-88 43 32 43 42 32 43 33 7 275 1988-89 43 41 38 39 41 35 43 19 299 1989-90 44 42 42 39 37 41 33 25 303 1990-91 53 41 38 44 39 40 40 34 329 1991-92 44 55 44 38 38 37 39 29 324 1992-93 47 41 52 28 33 43 36 26 306 1993-94 43 53 32 44 30 34 39 27 302 1994-95 41 43 49 30 42 33 14 252 1995-96 41 41 43 49 30 42 14 260 1996-97 41 41 41 43 49 30 14 259 1997-98 41 41 41 41 43 49 14 270 1998-99 41 41 41 41 41 43 14 262 1999-2000 42 41 41 41 41 43 14 263 2000-01 42 42 41 41 41 41 14 262 2001-02 42 42 42 41 41 41 14 263 2002-03 42 42 42 42 41 41 14 264 2003-04 43 42 42 42 41 41 14 265 1983-1993 +11% 30 EAST COUNTY/VINTON TOTAL 1983-84 3620 1984-85 3462 1985-86 3500 1986-87 3524 1987-88 3452 1988-89 3386 1989-90 3288 1990-91 3295 1991-92 3301 1992-93 3317 1993-94 3392 1994-95 3424 1995-96 3472 1996-97 3545 1997-98 3614 1998-99 3584 1999-2000 3537 2000-01 3479 2001-02 3467 2002-03 3459 2003-04 3409 1983-1993 -6% 32 WILLIAM BYRD MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 7 8 SE T 1983-84 337 362 16 715 1984-85 276 332 27 635 1985-86 288 282 34 604 1986-87 275 297 31 603 1987-88 246 295 29 570 1988-89 242 251 263 42 798 1989-90 215 250 236 57 758 1990-91 209 227 249 62 747 1991-92 240 205 216 57 718 1992-93 260 242 208 63 773 1993-94 281 262 244 61 848 1994-95 242 276 264. 83 865 1995-96 250 246 280 83 859 1996-97 293 252 249 83 877 1997-98 260 296 255 83 894 1998-99 268 260 296 83 907 1999-2000 292 268 260 83 903 2000-01 253 292 268 83 896 2001-02 233 253 292 83 861 2002-03 233 233 253 83 802 2003-04 234 233 233 83 783 1983-1993 +6% *Assumptions 1) 45 new housing units in 1995 1) 430 new housing units over 3 years 2) .08 children/unit 2) 143 new housing units/year 3) .08 x 45 = 4 children 3) .08 children/unit 4) 1 student/grade 4) .08 x 430 = 30 children 5) 3 students/grade level/year 34 MOUNT PLEASANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 50 52 48 64 53 67 66 400 1984-85 52 53 54 52 64 54 58 387 1985-86 55 46 48 55 48 67 55 374 1986 46 46 55 41 46 55 49 64 356 1987-88 42 44 55 40 44 51 46 6 328 1988-89 65 41 49 50 43 44 5 297 1989-90 42 60 39 41 48 41 4 275 1990-91 67 41 61 42 40 46 5 302 1991-92 47 68 40 58 43 42 7 305 1992-93 40 47 63 43 58 48 16 315 1993-94 54 51 55 64 49 53 16 342 1994-95 42 54 52 52 66 46 21 333 1995-96 43 43 55 53 53 67 21 335 1996-97 44 44 44 56 54 54 21 317 1997-98 45 45 45 45 57 55 21 313 1998-99 45 45 45 45 45 57 21 303 1999-2000 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 291 2000-O1 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 291 2001-02 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 291 2002-03 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 291 2003-04 46 45 45 45 45 45 21 292. 1983-1993 +15% *Assumptions 1) 105 new housing units 2) 35 new housing units/year/3 years 3) .25 elementary school children/unit 35 x .25 = 8 children 4) 1 child/year/grade 36 W. E. CUNDIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 74 91 83 82 107 98 92 36 663 1984-85 61 77 79 76 77 105 94 28 597 1985-86 74 75 73 75 76 87 103 31 594 1986-87 88 86 65 69 79 76 87 29 579 1987-88 93 103 87 81 75 94 90 13 636 1988-89 83 101 83 89 86 82 8 532 1989-90 92 86 91 97 83 86 6 541 1990-91 93 91 82 100 95 87 8 556 1991-92 81 91 87 84 95 97 16 551 1992-93 79 85 91 83 85 91 19 533 1993-94 68 92 85 100 91 86 14 536 1994-95 56 71 92 77 95 88 10 489 1.995-96 58 58 73 94 79 97 10 469 1996-97 58 58 58 73 94 79 10 430 1997-98 58 58 58 58 73 94 10 409 1998-99 58 58 58 58 73 94 10 409 1999-2000 59 58 58 58 58 73 10 374 2000-01 59 58 58 58 5$ 58 10 359 2001-02 59 59 58 58 58 58 10 360 2002-03 60 59 59 58 58 58 10 362 2003-04 60 60 59 59 58 58 10 364 1983-1993 +.7% *Assumptions 1) 45 new housing units in 1995 2) .25 elementary school children/unit 3) 2 student/year/grade 45 x .20 = 9 children 38 O O ~O~' w ti w •N V sgg~p~~~~g~g ggppCps~s~~ yg88~~ppp~~~ pgpO~gppsppp~~~~~~ ggl~~ YMia V1 fV ~0~0ONN~ ONm~NN O~/1MM aOOT aON~ b~~ C M M ..... V1 .~ ..i ...i ~ ..i E.., - ^.. ssg~~g~~~~ ss~~~~ s ~ gs~~~~ g~~ MaeovacaMMM mp v, ve• m o mm v.F vi nmfNV •l M M N N M N M M M ~ M t~ 1 M N N M M M M N N N M N N N O O pOp ~ M ~p ~sg ~ ~+ N ~? O O M h N O V O O .f '~' n o x N E E 0 C 'a .. C Y E >F u a !+ E "" a 9~ d U P O 8 S F s 8 '^ o o h v, v, o n o .., v, v, po pppp p ~ ; NN~.N.M Iy~^.M.~ N.N.N.~.nm 000 O. V ~O~n~ .-N.. O~ ,~ n Q M VR ~ ~. E m c ~ 7 ~a ~ ~ a$ v ro, M ° o ,;, a ~ ... M M N ~ p~o k3 N O )~ O 8888888888 888888 8 8 888888 8 .~ C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 p0 0 0 0 0 0 pOp O Co0 0 0 pp0 0 0 O M M C COQ hvi v100vi0 `D~^ OMMd'O~O~ O. N V h.~"00~0 •f b ~ ry ~'~ m N 0 h m~~ ~D t g> ~ N - .. ~ ~j - - ~ 4Y. ~ O O O $ $ N N 3 ~ ~ ~ O O h O C 1N~ N C d 55~~ 55~~ 5~ 5~ 5~ 5~ Q .5 q 25 25 ZS c2~5 25 25 25 25 25 25 ZS 25 25 Z5 2g5 25 $ $g $ Q$ '° gg ~ ~a~o g e gg ge~~~~ o ~a~OS y~ NN M - M ~ T t~eh ,t, • ~ ~ Y 8 ~ a. ~ ;, E ~ ~ ~> > a ~ g o'c v °G' E W ~xGC7~U v u 'C p N C G ~ 'Y' ~ C Y ~ N Sn x ~ ~ v O > OL ;b y N ~ ~ "~"" :1 U 'O Cl ~ S d PL~ a ~ 'C ~ y r~i rd Val C e ~~ ~ ~~'~$> cw~,y.$~o~ y,g x~• w oaa d-TU.i ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~oG o E u`l,' uryn o u uty~.. a> aC~ 9U c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~+~ ~ ~a'oU ~v ~ `~ c ~ °7~Fi ~ Z'~ Y~z c F > o tUUx~a~UU~~a;zzaa~~~~c~c~w°C7 ~33x~o°e3 '~~~> oo ~>.» H ~z~zz ~' o ~ a ~ a ~ o a ~, W F, w ~ r N a .~ a N O 40 V Cave Spring High Capital Improvements Prgects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source 19,460,000 C LL,BI New high school (2,000 students) OR Addition to current high school of 29 classrooms, cafeteria & library expansion, and site improvements to accommodate grades 7,000,000 C LL,BI 9-12 and 2,000 students AND Addition to current high school of 5 science labs, 7 classrooms & elevator to 000 2500 C LL,BI accommodate current enrollment , 000 250 C BI Building renovations/restrooms , 175,000 C BI Air condition gyms 65,000 C BI Upgrade auditorium 60,000 MR GOR Roofing 25,000 MR GOR Storage space 000 40 MR GOR Replace rooftop A/C units , 000 30 MR GOR Replace ceiling tiles , 80,000 MR GOR Bleachers/gym 000 15 MR GOR Bleachers for athletic field , 000 150 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 35,000 MR GOR Floor covering 000 20 MR GOR Exterior door replacements , 30,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 000 20 MR GOR Sidewalk/step replacements , 200 43 MR GOR Administrative support technologies , Total 3,538,200 New stadium (6,000 seat capacity) * Application for literary funding pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 4,500,000 C BI Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/22/94 cip~CSHS.WK1 41 Hidden Valley Junior Hfgh Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Prq 'ect rrojec~ e T ru~~~~~~~ Source ~ yp Building renovations/restrooms 60,000 ~~ ~ C C BI BI Air condition gym/auditorium , 20,000 MR GOR Window repairs 20,000 MR GOR Replace ceiling file 60,000 MR GOR Floor covering 20000 MR GOR Physical education area 25,000 MR GOR Storage space 40,000 MR GOR Bleachers/gym 000 125 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , X0000 MR GOR Exterior door replacements 20,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 000 20 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 38 200 MR GOR Administrative support technologies , Total 568,200 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair Ep -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\HVJH.WK4 Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 43 Bent Mountain Elementary Capital Improvements Projects ect Description Cost Source Air condition classrooms Air condition gym Cover outside facia Outside lighting Physical education area Administrative support technologies Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\BM.WK4 60,0 C BI 60,000 C BI 20,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR 24,900 MR GOR 194,900 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 45 Clearbrook Elementary Capital Improvements Projects ect Description Cost Building renovations/restrooms Elevator Air condition gym Floor covering Paving parking lots/driveways Outside lighting Cover steeple Storage space Physical education area Sidewalks/step replacements Administrative support technologies Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Source 130,000 C BI 150,000 C BI 60,000 C ~ 15,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR 10,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR 5,000 MR GOR 24,900 MR GOR 459,900 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/21/94 cip\CBROOK.WK4 47 Oak GroVO Elementary Capital Improv~nents Projects ~~y~;~ ,.,o~,,~,rw..,, Cost Type Source Addition of 4 classrooms 8~ library 860,000 C ~~ ~ Air condition gym/auditorium 60,000 C C ~ Building renovations/restrooms 100,000 000 60 MR GOR Additional parking Administrative support technologies , 33,400 MR GOR Floor covering 25,000 000 25 MR MR GOR GOR Outside lighting , 000 30 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 000 20 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 15,000 MR GOR Storage space Total 1,228,400 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\OAKGROVE.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 49 Northslde Hlgh Capital Improvements Projects ect Description 'roject Cost Funding Source Athletic sports complex 7,500,000 C BI OR New gym, lecture hall & 4 classes 3,500,000 000 250 C C LL,BI BI Building renovations/restrooms , 175,000 C BI Air condition gyms 150,000 C BI Elevator 000 125 C BI Upgrade auditorium , 000 20 MR GOR Exterior door replacements , 80,000 MR GOR Bleachers/gym 000 30 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 25,000 MR GOR Storage space 000 250 MR GOR Stadium repairs/restrooms , 45,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 150,000 MR GOR Floor covering 000 30 MR GOR Upgrade student lockers , 000 135 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 200 41 MR GOR Administrative technology support , Total 5,006,200 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/22/94 cip\NSHS.WK1 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 51 Burlington Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Pry rrojec~ e T ru~~uu~a Source yp Addition of S classrooms 680,000 000 120 C C LL,BI BI Window replacement (94 Fall VPSA) , C BI Building renovations/restrooms 150,000 15,000 MR GOR Storage space 15,000 MR GOR Floor covering 000 30 MR GOR Replace gym floor , 000 60 MR GOR Air condition auditorium , 000 10 MR GOR Cover steeple , 000 15 MR GOR Outside lighting , 000 10 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 000 45 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 400 30 MR GOR Administrative support technology , Total 1,180,400 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/20/94 cip\BURL.WK4 53 Mason's Cove Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description P rro~ec` e T r"~~~~~'a Source ~~ yp 60'000 C ~ Air condition gym 000 60 C ~ Building renovations/restrooms , 25,000 MR GOR Addition parking Administrative support technologies 24,900 MR GOR GOR Floor covering 20,000 15,000 MR MR GOR Outside lighting 000 30 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 5 000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 15,000 MR GOR Storage space Total 254, 900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\MASON.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue COR _ general operating revenue 55 Glenvar Hlgh Capital Improvements Projects ect Description Cost Site improvements (94 Fall VPSA) Upgrade auditorium Building renovations/restrooms Air condition gym Storage space Bleachers/gym Floor covering Stadium repairs/restrooms Exterior door replacements Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways Administrative support technology Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/21/94 cip\GHS.WK1 =unding Source 200,000 C BI 75,000 C BI 50,000 C BI 125,000 C BI 25,000 MR GOR 60,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 250,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 30,000 MR GOR 150,000 MR GOR 38,200 MR GOR 1,043,200 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 57 Fort Lewis Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description PCost Project Funding Type Source Air condition classrooms, upgrade electric, renovation of existing space, gym addition $ ~ ADA improvements 1.300,000 C Land 30'000 C BI Total 1,330,000 * Application for literary funding pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/21/94 cip\FORTLWIS.WK4 59 * William Byrd Hlgh Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost Project Type Funding Source Addition of 22 classrooms & elevator 3,300,000 C LL,BI Upgrade auditorium 50,000 C BI Building renovations/restrooms 250,000 C BI Air condition gyms 175,000 C C BI BI Air condition shops & labs 60,000 000 225 MR GOR Relocate bus lot Replace A/C chiller , 125,000 MR GOR Additional parking 40,000 MR GOR Storage space 25,000 000 20 MR MR GOR GOR Replace ceiling the Upgrade student lockers , 30,000 MR GOR Stadium repairs/restrooms 250,000 MR GOR Roofing 50,000 MR GOR Floor covering 20,000 000 15 MR MR GOR GOR Exterior door replacements , 000 45 MR GOR Outside lighting Sidewalks/step replacements , 20,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 150,000 MR GOR Administrative support technology 38,200 MR GOR Total 4,888,200 * Application for literary funding of $2,500,000 pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/22/94 cip\WBHS.WK1 61 Herman L Horn Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Addition of 2 classrooms & library 620,000 C LL,BI BI Air condition gym 60,000 000 50 C C ~ Building renovations/restrooms , 000 30 MR GOR Additional parking Administrative support technologies , 29,800 MR GOR Drainage 20,000 000 30 MR MR GOR GOR Floor covering , 000 20 MR GOR Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways , 25,000 MR GOR Replace cafeteria floor 20,000 000 15 MR MR GOR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 000 15 MR GOR Storage space , Total 934,800 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/21/94 cip\HLHORN.WK4 63 Roland E. Cook Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project ~~ Project Type Funding Source Addition of 4 classrooms & library 650,000 C LL,BI Air condition gym/auditorium 40,000 C BI BI Building renovations/restrooms 150,000 C BI Land 120,000 000 20 C MR GOR Additional parking Administrative support technologies , 24,900 MR GOR Drainage improvements 20,000 000 160 MR MR GOR GOR Elevator Floor covering , 20,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 10,000 000 12 MR MR GOR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways , 000 10 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements , 000 15 MR GOR Storage space , Total 1,251,900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/21/94 cip\RECOOK.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 65 Arnold R. Burton Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Building renovations Elevator/ADA Administrative support technologies Air condition shops Air conditioning upgrade Exterior door replacements Greenhouse heating Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways Sidewalk/step replacements 35000 C BI 150000 C BI 27,700 MR GOR 200,000 MR GOR 75,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 10,000 MR GOR 20000 MR GOR 80,000 MR GOR 12,000 MR GOR Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cipWRB.WK1 629,700 Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 67 Various School Buildings Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Mandates: Alarm systems (94 Fall VPSA) 128,625 MR GOR Asbestos abatement 400,000 000 80 MR MR GOR GOR Dumpster screening (ordinance) , Fire alarm systems ($235 per strobe horn: 500,000 MR GOR Kitchen suppression systems 54,000 MR GOR Lead paint management plan 15,000 MR GOR Radon abatement 50,000 Regs pending MR MR GOR GOR Sprinkler systems Other Capital Needs: ADA improvements (94 Fall VPSA) 100,000 MR BI Mobile unit (94 Fall VPSA) 26,375 MR BI Roofing (94 Fall VPSA) 300,000 MR BI Facilities & Operations Shop/Storage: Administrative support technologies 22,400 MR GOR Paving parking/driveways 32,000 MR GOR Screening 20,000 MR BI Storage facility 50,000 MR BI Total 1,778,400 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/21/94 cip~ALLSCHLS.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 69 Recap of Land Needs Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project ~~ Project Type Funding Source Mount Pleasant Elementary 155000 C C BI ~ Back Creek Elementary '~~~ 30000 C ~ Fort Lewis Elementary Roland E. Cook Elementary 120000 C ~ Cave Spring Elementary 35,000 C C BI ~ Penn Forest Elementary ~~~ Total 445,000 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\LAND.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue ~o ~!'~! F+~1 8 `~ ~ O ~~ ~ ~~ONOOOOO~e+1POcpOo0t~1~0 ~ ~D ~ zo ~~~~~ o~~ o~~~o ~o b ~ Q~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C H 71 .$ .~ P 4 v ... .~ o~ .. v h ~w O ~ ~ N II ~ p ~ ~ ~ '~. e +~ ~ . 00 c~ Obi h V .~ .~ V ~ o ~ a ~ e ~ Y ~ W ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~, Q O ~ fl. .V T ~ N O ~.~„ Instructional Technology Proposal Roanoke County Public Schools July 1994 Technology shall be incorporated into curricula to enhance instruction, facilitate active learning and assist the teacher in the preparation, deli~~ery and management of instruction. Roanoke County Schools Technology Plan L1av 14, 1993 73 Capital Request for Technology Equipment by Type/Purpose Descri tion 1 t ~ Est. Avera a Price* ~ Est. Total Lab Com uters for Com uter Science - Hi h Schools ! 52 $1,199 $62,348 Printers/ rinter access I 16 1 $1 400 $22 400 Networkin 96 ' $100 $9 600 Presentation Station 4 $5,000 $20,000 General Multimedia Lab for Hi h Schools 96 $1,699 $163 104 Printers/ rinter access 16 $1,400 $22 400 Networkin 96 $100 $9,600 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access ! 4 $5 750 $23,000 General Multimedia Lab for Middle School 96 i $1 699 $163,104 Printers 16 $1,400 $22,400 Networkin ' 96 $100 $9 600 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access 1 4 1 $5 750 $23,000 General Multimedia Lab for RCCC ' 12 $1,699 $20,388 Printers 2 , $1 400 $2 800 Networkin ! 12 ~ $100 $1 200 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access ` 1 $5,750 $5,750 Classroom Com uters @ 1:10 Ratio 1382 i $1,699 $2 348 018 Classroom Printers 1382 1 $388 $536 216 Carts/tables 13821 $100 $138,200 Libra Automation Elementa /RCCC ! 12 i $4,935 $59 220 Libra Multimedia Stations ALL 26' $9 431' $245 206 Lar a Classroom Monitors 1 8001 $1,999 $1,599,200 Laser Disc Players 800! _ $750 $600 000 VCR/Bracket or Cart/Cables/Switch ~ 0 $500 $400 000 Sub-Total - General Technolo E ui ment ~ $6 506 754 I Instructional Networks for Hi h Schools } 1 $233,765 $233,765 Instructional Networks for Middle Schools/RCCC 1 $233,665 $233 665 Instructional Networks for Elementa Schools ~ 1 I $451,200 $451 200 Network Telecommunications 26; $4,000 $104,000 WAN for Count Schools ' 1 ~ $85,000 $85,000 ~ Sub-Total - Networkin 1 51,107,630 Total - General Technolo for all schools 1 $7 614 384 i 1 La to Com uters/Printers for IEP's 145! $1 5701 $227,650 La to Com uters/Printers for S eech 7 $2,369 $16,583 S eech Evaluation E ui ment ! 1 ~ $13,281 $13,281 Total - S ecial Education i 5 2 5 7 51 4 'Estimated Prices are based on current pricing for state-of-the-art equipment (July, 1994) 75 Computer Distribution 1:10 Ratio 1994 Capital Budget Proposal School Enrollment 1:10 Ratio Cave S rin Hi h 1192 119 Glenvar Hi h 599 60 Northside Hi h 1092 109 William 6 d Hi h 1020 102 Cave S rin Junior 917 92 Hidden Valle 787 79 Northside Middle School 875 88 William B rd Middle 871 87 RCCC 142 14 Totals - Seconds 750 Back Creek 289 29 Bent Mountain g1 g Burlin ton 335 34 Cave S rin Elem. i 525 f 52 Clearbrook 1 17 12 Fort Lewis 180 18 Glen Cove 5151 52 Glenvar Elementa 520) 52 Green Valle 391 39 Herman L. Horn 470 ! 47 Mason's Cove 2gg 27 Mount Pleasant 394 39 Mountain View 391 39 Oak Grove 530 53 Penn Forest 577 58 R. E. Cook 236 24 W. E. Cundiff 502 ; 50 Totals - Elementa 632 Totals 138171 1 382 77 VOCATIQNAL & :~DL'LT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT July 20, 1994 Capital Equipment needs for next 4 to 6 years This Request includes the following programs: Business Education Marketing Education Health Education Agriculture Education Home Economics Technology Education Trade & Industrial Education These Programs are located in the foilowing Schools: ARBTC RCCC CSHS GHS NSHS WBH5 CSJR HVJR wBM NSM Major categories of equipment needs include: I. Computer labs to train students for entry level jobs in all programs above. Tris would be DOS Equipment including computers, printers and necessary installation hardware for schools listed above. $1,210,685 II. Computer Aided Drafting labs for CSHS and GHS and upgrade Computer Aided Uraiting (C~=_D) at :vSHS and WBHS; also Systems Integrated vfanufacturin; lab~(~I~e~ 260,000 III. Multi-media production equipment 166,100 ~ CCr ~~~ ~} IV. Bring Auto Technology Departments up to ASE Standards 93,000 ~ ! V. State of the art sewing machine centers for Home Ec. 42,500 VI. Synergistics labs for four Middle Schools 500,000 VII. Modernize student work stations for all programs '184,989 Total Requested by Vocational & Adult Education Department: 53,057,274 79 Fine Arts Needs Report Art Number Ism Per Unit Cost Total Cost 10 Kilns 1685.00 16,850.00 10 Potters wheels 835.00 8350.00 1 35MM camera 500.00 500.00 8 Printing presses 1800.00 14,400.00 8 Hand tool sets 100.00 800.00 8 Electric tool sets 300.00 2400.00 10 Paper cutters 349.00 3490.00 100 Air brushes 35.20 3520.00 4 Compressors 275.00 1100.00 8 Laminators 1000.00 8000.00 8 Mat cutters 280.00 2240.00 4 Pug mills 1785.00 7140.00 8 Computer labs 22,000.00 176,000.00 8 Craft tool sets 200.00 1600.00 250 Picture frames 15.00 3750.00 TOTAL 250,140.00 sl .~ •,~ .'~ N v V w o~ w .,~ AN ~ F L f- , z 2 a` OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 326 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM. VIRGINIA 24133 July 14, 1994 A REVIEW OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY FACILITY UTILIZATION AND ORGANIZATION Attached are alternative southwest county facility utilization and organization plans. These plans are not to be construed as recommendations but are alternatives available. Administrative Observations (1) The fall of 1997 would be the earliest a new high school would be available for use. (2) It appears that the present Cave Spring Junior/Middle would be utilized until 1997. (3) Renovation and other improvements for most schools would continue to exist (refer to capital improvements plan completed in June, 1994). (4) Funding would be necessary for converting the present high school to a middle school and improvements at Hidden Valley Junior/Middle. (5) Existing athletic facilities and parking at Cave Spring Junior/Middle will need to be retained if the school is closed. (6) Subterrain cost may be a critical factor in projecting new high school and athletic construction cost for Starkey property. 82 ~. O 1~1 H d N G7 ~4 O A dZ' FBI F N ~I a H h a ~1 0 W M~1 W ~ o ~ .fin .r H h ~ ~ ~ .~~.y! L O W ld ri H ~ ~ '~ ~ I.r ^., W y ~ ~ .ti. N . Z ~ td ... ~ i V! N ~ ~ ~ rr .'~ lOr ~ h ~ z Z .C U ~. O U vVi ~ ~i .~ ~ F~ .`~ ~.. d~ Q H o ~ U ~Ly ~ iii y W O L d a a ~o rx • b h U LQ C O ~ O .O ;b > °• p' ~ ^, N h ~ R ~ ~ a r-J F"' a0 h-I Z 0 F ~ ~ ~ A ~ w ~ 0 ~ o o ~ ° ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ C .. 00 ~ U a~•G h ~ q ..C o " N c~ 6~ a~ ~ f3. a a -~ U Q cC U c~ ~ ~ .b O ~ O ~j ~ h a a ,,, ~ ~ d ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~'~ 'N E o ~ o ~. U o c a~ ~ o ^~ o U ~ c ~ ~ ~ •~ N ~ CF/] . V ~ C4 iC L/~ ~ O ti ~ ~ > > 0 C O a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ v ~ ~~ ~ .Ti O ~ ~ ~.. O ~ 6 O ~ h f/~ ~ 3 i c o° ¢ i c ~ ~ o° 0 Z U ~ U ~ U t5 4 ~, -., O H N z Q ~/ W O z z 0 N W F W .~ d G'r W .~ W a Q u b w _ O ~U O w h O U ` = y U u o ~ _~ ~_ ~ ~ .C N y H Z Z .C O W W o 61 a W to y ~ ~ .' K. U ra + + '~ N ° - > - ~ ~ ~. a A ~ ~ z ~~ ~~ o a ~ .s U ~ A ~ T `° n .' °.. o W ~ o o O ~ R f° ~ ~ o °o C =~ 00 ~ u `'-' 'C ~~ ca ^o ~ ~° s ~ .o :~ .c ~ ~~ ~:?:: ~ m `~ v~ a ~ an.~ ~ v b A ~° z ~ o a C+. ~ ti '~.. .. _ ~ ~ c F °' _ a" > a ~ U c U a~ U Q -~ a U O ~. oo ~ .. ~ ~ a~ o v ~ A _ ~ ~ N ~ U b '~ U r r O C V A ~ ~ " a °° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ y _ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ C Yr ~ '7 ~ Q ' z ~~ t5 b +v V dA .~ ti O O v ,v +, ~~t.."" ~-cv-.. C v ~~~~ COMMONFTEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPART.`4ENT OF EDIICATION P. O. BO% 2120 RICHMOND, VA 23216-2120 ~'r SUPT NOV 8 1993 Supts. Memo No. 198 November 5, 1993 INFORMATIONAL TO: Division Superintendents FROM: Joseph A. Spagnolo, Jr. Superintendent of Public Instruction Edward W. Carr, Deputy Supe=intendent for Administration SUBJECT: Public School Building Ccst 1992-93 Attached are: 1. A list of new public school projects put under contract in fiscal year 1992-93 with individual and average cyst data by school types; 2. A list of projects individual types; selected additions in fiscal year and average cyst and rznovation 1992-93 with data by school 3. A 6-year (1987-88 thru 1992-93) tabulation of average unit area and cost data; and 4. A graph, based on the abcve, indicating the change in public school construction costs over a 6-year period. In general, the data covers the same items from year to year. If the construction cost does not acree with your records, it is because we have added built-in equipment, such as kitchen equipment, which may have been awarded in separate contracts (see footnotes). If you have questions concerning the above, please call Hunter L. Barnes, Architectural Consultant, Facilities Services at (804) 225-2035. JASjr/EWC/dr 88 ' ra E+ F-{ N I~ N l~ ~ l'1 ~ ~-+ ~ O N O N c0 c'1 O tp In ~O ~ O O ~ U 0.~ .-r. m O- p © O ~ <"~ ,~ ~ v} v} v} yr ~ ~. I ~ N ~ F ~p ~O v' l") lp l[1 1p O rl tp In cD N Q1 (!] Cc. ~ ~ O O a' c'1 ~O ~0 c'~ ~ U t!] c~ + } r, ~ ~o ~o c~ ~ ~ r ur yr yr yr yr ~ ~ a ra • N Gr LL CD 10 f'1 r1 f'1 N C1 N Q7 N V' a' Q1 'C! ° i w ~ ~ ~ ~ '~' ~ N '~ Gl o v c~ U A ''~ U] O O O to Q N ,..~ r,,,~ k z ~1 O ~O O O Q Q O ~ ~D N v O -i ~ 41 H ,~ ' W F o~ ~ °o c c Q ~ o ~' a~ F ~ ~ N CD ~O VI IC .,~ 'L3 ~ z ~+ z ~, ~ O U O Fi .-+ ~ o o c ~o m f O O O d1 N f"1 ' N 3 0 ~' U N !L7 G1i r+ f 7 N GI S.i N W p O a N v v '1 I~ ' f~ O to ~ ~~ w c`1 f Q c Qt c ~ (~ Q N O ~ ° D U] Er o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ;° ~ ~' ~ ~ .~ ~a z F `' ~ a U U yr ~ ?, ~ to C N y ~ Sl ., ~ U FN ~ U O O C1 O ~O a' ~ ~. ~o 3 ~ ... Cl~ L.' ~ U7 CJ ~0 ~0 t•7 I~ N ~ U '^' w a a. ~ Q © ~ ~ c, ~ ~ a,, ~ O U ~ C m Q H ~ O E.., "" C LZ ~ h C~ a W ~~.. ~ E+ N Q1 f'7 Q1 n Q1 f"f G1 n C1 N Q1 0 ~ ~ U ~ Q f~ ' ~ ~ ~ :J . Q . C1 In l! 7 N Q1 N •r1 z '~ N '~ m w U U ro ~o ~~ G.7 ~ o U o U ~ ~ O O d ~ W ~ O H D i-i t!1 ~ :~ U •-~ ~.+ iC 0 ~ k ~ C O W ~ ~-t ~ .~ d 'Q !-i m b C -~ C to ~ O ~ a ~ ,~ o s~ ~a -, .~ U VI ~ a~ F n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w a i v o ~j U ~ a o ~, ~ ° o x ~~ H ~ ~a ~~ C ~ ~ 3 •-1 ? W E o~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z ~ 1J k „ „ 7 i,t ~ .-i ~ Q , C z ~ N ~ ! o U ~ W C7 ~ } .a t 7 i ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~W ~~ 0 a ~ U r. 6 ~ r ] U] Ei N a r1 ~ .~ -. -- ---- - - ---- -- ------ --- 90 f'1 Q~ I N G1 e-1 a w a O O U z H E U E z a• U rr O W z n z F n z F a to a E Cn F ... U w U h O 4 ~ a E z F o H ~ E-~ > O z w a n z z 0 H E H n n n W F U W a w W C•1 117 OS t0 G1 N In ~O ~O d• O [-+ ~ c'1 r-1 01 lL1 f~ ~O O d' C1 N to G1 (~+ O tl a (~ C1 ~D N r-1 O IL'1 l~ .-~ U tq N tf1 N lC1 ~ a' ~ Q t[1 ~O r'1 a ~ Gr E O v7 E+ z 0 H F U F ~ F O O U U .n E+ ~ W z~F o~~ U ~ n CO to c'1 O O C'1 O n7 O N d' c") f'1 ~O t0 C1 ~O In ~O 111 V' r•1 CO N ~O N ~ f~ t~ ri O Q- N r•1 ~O GD ~ r•i O ~ r•i N m O N r-1 CO c") O rl In IfI Q e-1 N r-1 e-1 l11 Q1 ri rl N ~ O t~ c'1 O O c"f r'1 N O O ~O v' O C~ f'1 O O C'1 N N O O c") a' C C1 c'1 O CO Q1 rl ~O N N ~O R1 6l C1 N e' c' ~ P1 '•~l 111 t~ CO I~ I~ O O ~O l~ ~D CD l~ C1 ~C' •a' N rd t0 N e• C1 Iff N r-i ~O ~ CO ~• ~ ~ t!} U? N C C1 C rf ri rl b tn• ur N N N C1 N c 1 c'1 f'1 ('1 C1 P'1 01 Q1 ('^1 ~ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ N e-f \ rl Q1 ~C !f1 ~O LC1 N N e•i rl C1 Q1 O V' tA• ~. :~ ?r U U 0 U ?~ 1~ IQ R ~ U cC 1~ o O U ~ CU' ?~ ~ U ~ ~ U U to ~ n1 ~ •-+ U C 'L7 ~ ro a~ 7 > o c c a~ o o c c ~+ a n L ZT C~ 0 ~ Sr w ,1G T ~ G1 U l+ {.+ .~ n1 fa ~C U Sa C 1J >r > > cn o _ ~ a > n cz W 4 z ~ +i • -~ L'+ ~ ,.. •••1 Z' 4! C ~ ~ W ~+ ,- i 4l .i ... CI ~ ~ ~ O w 'C '~ - W C+ ' C -•~ •-~ ~u c t s~ ,-a ~ a~ s ~+ ~ W W U ~ ~ ~ ~ > W !.1 0 ,. .1 O 0 ~ 3 0 ~ U c0 O a ~ W c m m ~ C La ~ > b i+ a~ d E a rts >, fa N c0 S.r LI ~ G O ~ E ~ W U ~ 'i 0 O ~ ~ ~ E -.~ G '~ . .' . r -1 D 7 C Ij E c l~ ~ 92 _. . .~~ cD ~ y, ~ ~ ~ O ~ c a ~~ ~ ~ E rn r ~ ~ ... d O U ~ ~- ~ ~ i m ~- .~-i ~ •- ~ ~ ~ ~' .- ~ r ~ Q7 O ~ ~ C ''~>~ o ~\ \ \\\ r ~ o ~ L . \\\\ \\ \ .~.. ~ ~ W W I 1 j • ~/ L ~ Q / U . o ~ ~n o w o w o a~ t~ t~ ca co io w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 94 y ~-~- n n ^_'3 d ~ ~ ~ E - - ~ - I _l n rc .~ )3a 8 g ~ a g G aou 71aHSta3 )19iMY3 ~rw ~ Y~ c ~g f ,~ (` ~ V ~1 ~ n f -a ~n 111 + ~ 1 `o ,~ ~ °o 4 th .F ~~w a. O 1' ~ t u v E Ll ~ li O Y ro r o t~( rE 4 0 N , p ~` V ~ ~ ~ ~ , t] ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ r A v' ~+i o _ ~l p/ a ~g ~ I~ f' ~ ~LL W ~ ^ J I(.1 J ~ ~ Xn~ VV~ ~ ~ „ J OCI CCI I ]al ]1J~ r' ~ 1 ~, - i i.. W 3 'I L r _ ~ - a ~ ~~ ,. ~ -- - F - - Z , ~ ~' - _ Qv y u w p\. ~ Q N U a ,\ uaai la r a `_,• I 1 Q ~ it 1 ~ r - J J• - i 7 v lW ~ ~ I g t k- -J --~rJ- -~- '- .~ I ~ I tl nns I J 1 a01s uols b u o -- -~.~. i y "' ~ ~ oo,s 5 ~ Y r - - - - ~ 4.. ~ o. ~ ~~ I I e al ~ I ~~ ~ I ~ ~ /y N V .} _L wlsfr,f= bbl 'Yaalnals " G d a ~- - '~ JI .1 a . I ~ o.~ ~ ° ~ ~? l ` i b ~ ,. _ ~.~5 _ _ ~ 7]Mra 1nJ ~ ,tom+'-ri] „N JaIna35 _f. raj o r1 0 ~ O N r - _. - ~ I -7. I ur u]x~ traiw3] I ~E'. I I 3 ffi $ __ _, ~, ~~ u00Y 9717 ~{ •- Y ~~ ` - - - y _. ~a- -- - --- -- C• utl uvaJ ub hn W ~ - - a++] 1 ~ _-_- LLLL~ N - _ O Y ^_9.SS7U0 7 J 9. ~a19 ~_~ ~r ~~ ~~ ~ ~ u I N k ~~ ~ _N 1/ Na HY 71 ~ C _.T - I G^ '~ u f _ o ~_r=_!~ _.. ~1 - o.5s]aa 3 a a.ao~ r~ - - --.- a N' ~ ~ .--~ ~r"'- 0 7 I n ~-~ I-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE `~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 72694-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session r ~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-7 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ROGER HALE AND BARBARA HALE TO OPERATE A PRIVATE HORSE STABLE LOCATED AT 4264 SPICEWOOD LANE AND 4324 WESTWARD LAKE DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 54.02-1-12 AND 54.02-1-4), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roger Hale and Barbara Hale have filed a petition to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1- 12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1- 12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substan- tially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Roger Hale and Barbara Hale to operate a private horse stable 1 located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District, with the following condition: a) There shall be no more than ten horses kept on the property. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ~a~'yKiNG kr ~ ~i l v - ., ~ of ~NOd ;fKd_ A~~ ~ ~~ ~ V ~ 9 J y Sa . GRANOVI~ ~a"'~ti ~ y s '~\^ }, • ~ 617 "ROtX \C,~t t ~ ~ ~ ~ _,.~. ~ ; ~ ~ RbL'1 ® 16 : ~ a ,t5 ~ ~~ S GlfNwgY,i~ \\ Ld µ .a ~,cy.~ 'i s -aTi. ~ •s.SS ` NivN SGCH~``GGwwYrtY rJ' ~~ ~! Lii~ ... '"'M% :. ~ } r t,•1M ~_...::t ~ Y~ ~ t GEELG 7G ~ ~ ---~ _{' ..~ i~ VICINITY MAP ' Q~I NORTH AND ZONING TAX MAP NG'M~,e: 5 '`~ C~ - I - /~ a ~~~ - '~ '` ~i'FQUFST.' Sr'CC/~t,c. G~ f~iC~M/T - 7'~PiVr~TE ~~.t et,c ,"' ~~ PETITIONER: ROGER & BARBARA HALE CASE NUMBER: 18-7/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 5, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 26, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of Roger & Barbara Hale for a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked why the ordinance stipulates the number of horses allowed on five acres or less but does not regulate the number of horses on larger tracts. Staff said there have been problems with a large number of horses on small lots. The applicant said that she plans to keep three horses. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. There shall be no more than ten horses kept on the property. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt voiced concern that there is no limitation on the number of horses allowed. He moved to recommend approval of the petition with the following condition: There shall be no more than ten horses kept on the property. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha 'ngton, Se etany Roanoke C unty Planning Commission MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 5, 1994 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JANET SCHEID, PLANNER ±~ RE: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE NUMBER: 18-7/94 ROGER & BARBARA HALE Nature of Request T-~ The applicants, Mr. and Ms. Hale are requesting a special use permit to allow a private stable on two tracts of adjoining property located on Spicewood Lane and Westward Lake Drive, in the Catawba Magisterial District. These properties are a combination of pasture and woods. The property on Spicewood Lane (4 acres) is owned by Mr. and Ms. Hale. The property on Westward Lake Drive (6.1 acres) is owned by Ms. Hale's aunt. Total acreage in the two lots is approximately 10 acres. Background There is currently three horses and a stable on these properties. The properties are zoned R-1. Prior to the December 1992 comprehensive rezoning these properties were zoned agricultural. The Hale's purchased their horses in the spring of 1993 and renovated the existing barn, under the assumption that their property was still zoned agricultural and horses were permitted by right. Mr. Hale's family has used these properties for cattle and horses for many years in the past. There was at least a two year lapse in the use of these properties for agricultural/farming purposes, therefore they are not grandfathered. There is a house on each piece of property. The stable is located on the Hale's property and the pasture land is located on both properties. Applicable Regulations 1. The Roanoke County Ordinance, Section 30-47-2, allows private stables with a special use permit and additional use and design standards which require: (1) a minimum lot size of 2 acres; (2) a limit of no more than one stable animal per acre if the lot is less than five acres; (3) stables and corrals must comply with setback requirements for accessory buildings; (4) animal waste must be property managed. ..~ Staff Report Case #18-7/94 Page two 2. Private stables are defined in the ordinance, Section 30- 29-1 as the "keeping, breeding, or raising of horses or ponies exclusively for the personal use and enjoyment of the owner or occupant of the property or the riding of horses or ponies by the owner or occupant of the property and their guests". As noted in #2 above, private stables are defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as only being for the use of horses and ponies. Therefore, other types of stable animals or farm animals are not permitted. Since both pieces of property total l0 acres there is no limitation on the number of stable animals allowed. Surrounding Area The general area is residential in nature. The residential properties between the Glenvar East subdivision and Route 643 (Dougherty Road) are relatively large lots. Adjoining these properties to the west is the subdivision. Recommended Conditions This property, although bordered by a subdivision, is not part of a subdivision. The applicant's property was used for agricultural purposes before the subdivision was built. For these reasons, staff does not believe that conditions limiting the number of horses and ponies are needed. COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only 1 `"'~` date~~ ~~ receiv ~~• apptic~oa fee: PC/BZA~d3tgsl9`~ // placards issued: BOS date• ~(~ Case lumber: ` / / J ~.~ Check type of application fil d (check all that apply): ^ REZONING C~SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~{o ~ e r -~ $ aY'o aX-~. 4-4 a.l ~ Phone: ~ `~'~ ' ~ ~1 O 1 Address: 4~,'i~4 SQ~~ Cc ~AJoo aL ~..r~ . Zip Code• ~;~ ;-~ Owner's name: Phone: Address: j ~.t--t_~ ~~ ,n<~rj~,J ~. Zip Code: Location of property: ~-~'a~~ Tax Map Number: i S~ ~~.::~,, c ~o a~v ~. - d Magisterial District: ~ b A r ~} L ,, % e Gr `~ ~ ~-4 W e s-l ice. a ,~ ,A l . . ~ . Community Planning Area: C ~ ~,`~~ ~ ~ Size of parcel (s): `~ ~ • ~ ~2 • ~ acres Existing Zoning: ~ I , Existing Land Use: S UJ 4~E, '~~, ~~/ 2~ ~ l,~t~..'LZ; ; sq.ft. J Proposed Zoning: R.- I .for'Staff Use .On/y. Proposed Land Use: Slv~~z~q.,..~tG`r ~, pP~~4~ c~..~~ljr` ~~ t' uSeType: l o~-~ ~ 7 ~G, ~tSE 7yFE P~ JAS S~tte Does the p el meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. D / oes the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES " NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ............................ ...........................:.......... Variance of Se s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: _~. Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application :;~~,;. Metes and bounds description - , Justification 'r` Adjoining property owners ;w. /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the'ow~er. Owner's Signature: 4 ~t:L ` ~.x5 h ~, ,,(J~ ~ictn~J-J.t Q-' r. N ct%~~ ct~ ' ,A.a., ~ I i :1.C~,, ANSWEF;~. iC? THE JUSTIFiCATICiPa FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERr1IT REBUEST 6~1.!ESTIONS: 1. WHEN WE GOT OUR HORSES IN MARCH 1993 WE WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT UUR PROPERTY WAS STILL ZONED AGRICULTURAL. WE HAU BEEN GIVEN l"HAT INFORMATION BY SEVERAL DIFF~_F;EtJT RELIABLE SOURCES. wE WOULD NOT HAVE PUT ALL GF THE r10NEY, TIME; ANU EFFORT INTO FENCING THE LAND. BUYING THE HORSES, AND CLEA~dING OUT THE OLD BARN IF WE HAD NOT BELIEVED THE ZONING WAS UPdCHAtJGEL`. r1Y HUSBAND'S FAMILY HAS l_IVEG GN THIS LAND FOR ALMOST 80 YEARS AND THEY USED THESE PASTI!RES FOR CATTLE AhJD HORSES FUR MANY YEARS. SO, ALTHOUGH THE ZONING IS NOU1 R1, PF.ObABLY BECA~!SE GF THE SUBDIVISION GL EN VAR EA~~1 THE HALE F~ROPERTIES~ HP,VE ALWAYS BEEN USED FOR FARMIhaG AND LIVESTC!GK. WE WOULD LIKE TO 6E ABLE TO CONTINUE USING OUR LAND AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN USED. 2. THE SF'EC:IAL l!SE PEF.MIT CONFORMS TO ROANOKE COUtJTY'S GUIDELINES BECAUSE ~JITH UUR ACREAGE WE WERE TOLD THAT WE I~JOL!LD BE ALLOWED FOUR HORSES. WE ONLY HAVE THREE. THE HORSES ARE ALL OWNED BY US. WE DO NOT BUARU HORSES. THEY P.RE USED FOR OUR OWN PRIVATE FAMILY PLEASURE. WE DO NOT RUN A STABLE, GIVE LESSONS, OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. 3. THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT WOULD ALLOW US TO KEEP UUR THREE HORSES T'I-!AT ARE VERY IMPOF:TANT TO OUR. FAMILY. ALL OF THE ADJOINING PROPEP,1'1' OWNERS HAVE CUMr1ENTED OIJ HUW r1UC:H THEY ENJOY THE HORSES. OtJE IhAN SAID THAI HE BELIEVES THAT THE HORSES INCREASE. THE VAL!!E OF HIS PROPERTY EsECAUSE WHFi~ PEOPLE VISIT, THEY C=OMr?ENT ON HUB^J NICE IT IS TU SEF HORSES FROM YOUR PACK PORCH. ONE NEIGHBOR SAID THAT HE HAU ASOU1~ 1 H~ENTY-F 7.vE NICTUkES OF THErI. THE NEIGHEtUkI-IUOU CH1 LURFN ESPECir~LLY" LOVE 1HE HORSES. WE HAVE GIVEN SUPERVISEC~ RIDES TO NEIGHBORS THAT HA`.'E VISITED US RNU UUR TWU UAULHTERS. THE GENERAL FEELING SEEMS TO fE ONE OF GREAT PLEASUPE IN BEING CLOSE TO A CITY AND STILL BEING ASLE TO ENJOY SOME COUNTRY LIFE. ALSO, OUR PRIVATE GRAVEL F.GAD RUNS E±ETWEEPti THE GLENVAR EAST PROPERTIES AND THE PASTURE. SO, IT'S NGT LIKE THE PASTURE IS BORDERItJG U>•' AGAINST ANYONE'S BACKYARD. I DON'T SEE THAT OUR HORSES ~10ULD HAVE ANY EFFECT EITHER W~=;Y OtJ PUEiLIC SERVICES AND FACILITiE~. THAhJf: YOU! r- 1..r ~_ _ ~~.~ ~I °'~~~F- a .~- 1 ~ i -- ~-w-~-_ `l.. VN I ~W~ ~~~ '. ~ ~~ .- ~~m W~~ ~ ~ ew ` ~ ~ i. NELG/E G/R. ~ •~ _ _ _ -• h a .. - -gyn.-- d . - o M /UNF C/,Q` y --v\~ ~ u 4 ~ n ~ n ti N AD Et C /R~ N I ~~ // bd, ~~ Ov ~~ ~~ Mo.29,t~ ,o/dao (/~c~i~//yy M,qP • S RAJ=_' SECT; D.s~i/OKE-- ~C.r~rTy Plyi/~//NS Cl~MMi.SS'iOn/ ~F /3~l.9~° F,?OM .PECO~vS f0/2 OF //El~t/ T,?ACj"S /~ Z BE/n/G A ~2E0///S/On/ of T-P-s'~T C "' OF ~t~IAP Mi10E FOR MAC/~E HALE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PL^A~'T~///lOF yL~tV CQARECT PV 1 / ~//)~ /~~//~I . ,PO.~.vo,rF- coa./~ VIRGINIA sY T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS `~\\ \P~ 2_\ Q 'a ~ ~, ~` ~~ _ \~ ~~ P9 ~~ ,v 0 • ~ ~ -- ~~. ~; ~, • ~ V SCALE 1' ?QO ~ _ _ GATE yOt/ 5~~~8Z_ y a° ;NDR :f~` $~ ' ~ r F~T ARD IAKE~ ^ .+: 1~~~~i. 1` `yrP'~ b t ~}~,~1 N-- ARO LA.~- \ ~ - I -` `o I .' .. - -t q~r,yp~' n..cc ~ ~ `,Ila W~•o' I ~~` ~.~.4m`' d F 1~s~2F ~y~~ ~.Z~ , ~~;~ R ctic LY y ~~~ ~3 ~\ ; ~ ~~ `.~, ~ ILK' \o~ c & AR '~ L. ~~ I p S a { 1~~ .a ,~'~.•RDCX ~9 ~j a ..~ ~ it r ~\jn,C'P~co~'~ ` i / ~ g~ I~~ 5 `b ~ '' j ~~~ L NIVM (CNEI,ry~~'~U / I silk ~~ ":1G C{ ~L E.~~sl D~ELLLE _-_.~ _~~.~~ .~ ;~" VICINITY MAP ' ~~ N NORTH .. ~~ * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING %~T /T/Gn/ER.' %~CG~iQ ~~ d ~K'~~t f-lA ~ ~ T.4X MAC N~'MdE~: ~ ~ C~ - I- /~ ~:,,~ - yC AND ZONING ' ~i'FQUFS7'.' Sr'c c i~ ~ G~ ~'E~c'I~1 ~ T - j ,~ s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ROGER HALE AND BARBARA HALE TO OPERATE A PRIVATE HORSE STABLE LOCATED AT 4264 SPICEWOOD LANE AND 4324 WESTWARD LAKE DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 54.02-1-12 AND 54.02-1-4), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roger Hale and Barbara Hale have filed a petition to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1- 456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Roger Hale and Barbara Hale to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward 1 ~~ Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District, with the following condition: a) There shall be no more than ten horses kept on the property. c:\wp51\agenda\zoning\hale 2 ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-8 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO D. JEFFRY PARRHILL TO CONSTRUCT A FACILITY FOR RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING CLASSROOMS AND FELLOWSHIP HALL TO BE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF FEATHER ROAD AND TEMPLE DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 71.07-1- 26.2), VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, D. Jeffry Parkhill has filed a petition to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to D. Jeffry Parkhill to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 M ., _ 24 ~y ~ ~ Y ~x+i °'o. o ~N ~ ~ `»ti~'~ a.s+w ~ An a ~<.a c.•r 631• o.aaas ~ `~~ +~i -y'~.'~.c~r ,.Jw+ o.. r~.`:E( tl.?.- S- '~'•,y~° ~' `rJ 6a ~a,c~r ~x' .~ .. ~ ~ / ~ INN ~~~k`.~\./~ ~~~. y -. 1~ =' ~ ~/~_`; ~rs_~~ ~ 'i/ CG ~~^"' ^~ :1 ~=.T i ,w,...... tom' ~ " -r--~ _ 8 p ~ ~ ~ q G~~~° ms's -3 VIN'T~N .~y ~IhL~014wCi6 c.rr. Ck ~~J ~~ - CJG~~~'~~L~ vw~CnNEi .~~ '- ~s-~~.. ~.~,,:~r g.a.. _~::~, VICINITY M A P ~ _ ~ ~ - :~t~~ ..~~:~ . Q mot". ~ NORTH ~ DEPARTi~,NT OF PLANNING iC / ///ON~K : L, ./CFFRY Ys1~KH/JCL :. - ~~ ~Xl?us~ pF PRsI >/E,c~ Tn'i•S~~s~ AND ZONING TdXMAPNUM~Q: 'Jl. Qrf .- /-.2G ..2 r ~ 77El~JUtSi : s~Ec/1- [. G5~ ~F~M ~r ~~[ ~G /ous Ass ~MB~y ,~„ ~-,,; PETITIONER: JEFFRY PARKHILL i .~ CASE NUMBER: 19-7/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 5, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 26, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill for a Special Use Permit to construct a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the completion date, access to the site and type of detention pond. Mr. Parkhill commented as follows: The proposed completion date for the project has not been set; however, construction for the first phase could start as early as late fall. It was decided that access on Feather Road rather than Hardy Road would be safer. The detention pond should be no more than a grass depression as opposed to a stone ditch and the drainage will be controlled. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson commended the applicant on the site plan and moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: -Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other f Terrance rrington ecretary Roanoke ounty Planring Commission STAFF REPORT PETff1ONER: D. JEFFRY PARKHILL CASE NUMBER: 19-7/94 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION ~.. PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: JULY 5, 1994 '-The petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill (House of Prayer) seeks a Special Use Permit to construct a facility for religious assembly. The 2.34 acre site is located immediately northwest of the intersection of Hardy Road and Feather Road in the Vinton Magisterial District. The petitioner's request ultimately includes a 300-seat sanctuary, fellowship hall/family life center, offices and classrooms. Phase I will include only a 250-seat worship area, two administrative offices, and six Sunday school classrooms. No day care facility is planned. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Religious assembly is allowed only by Special Use Permit in the R-1 district. Use and design standards for this use type include a maximum building coverage of 30%, a maximum lot coverage of 50% of the total lot area, and added landscaping requirements for parking areas and outdoor activities which adjoin residential use types. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT which may also require a minimum 150 foot long taper and turn lane south of the Feather Road- Temple Drive intersection. 2 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ,,:,9 "~ Location -The subject site is situated in the northwest corner of the Hardy Road/ Feather Road intersection. The site is in the Vinton Community Planning Area and urban services are available. Togopraphy Ve etation -Proposed site is grassed and undeveloped. The property slopes very gently uphill from Hardy Road to Temple Drive ending with a row of mature hardwood trees paralleling an existing ditch along Temple Drive. Surroundin Neighborhood -The petitioner's and surrounding tracts are zoned R-1. Mixed woodland and pasture lie south across Hardy Road from the subject site. Existing homes stand east across Feather Road and to the north undeveloped, wooded property occupies land across Temple Drive. The subject property is immediately east of an existing church. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The developer proposes a 15,400 square foot, one-story predominantly brick building and parking to accommodate 89 vehicles (family life center could approach a maximum of 45 feet in phase III of development). As designed, the project will press the allowed lot coverage to the maximum of 50 percent. Building coverage will be well within the 30 percent maximum permitted. Access - VDOT has stated that a turning lane taper of at least 150 feet in length will be needed for traffic south-bound on Feather Road turning west into the site. No sight distance problems have been noted. The concept plan also calls for an entrance at the northwest corner of the property off Temple Drive. Traffic Generation/Circulation -The 1992 ADT for this portion of Hardy Road was 12,114 vehicles. Feather Road carried 1988 vehicles/day in. 1990 and Temple Drive 48 in 1986. In 1988, four accidents were reported at the intersection of Hardy Road and Feather Road. The proposed facility will hold services on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. The ITE Trip Generation manual estimates an average 31.5 trips per 1,000 gross square feet of building on Sundays and 7.7 trips per 1,000 gross square feet on weekdays. Based on these figures, at least 485 additional trips may be anticipated on Sundays and 119 additional trips may be expected on weekdays. Considering that traffic should be dispersed both north toward Route 24 and south and west toward Hardy Road, no significant impacts are anticipated for either major carrier, although Feather Road will be initially impacted by the proposed east entrance. 3 .q ,- ~~°",. Amenities -The applicant intends to maximize lot coverage at nearly the 50 percent R-1 district limit. The concept plan indicates interior parking lot landscape peninsulas although no actual plantings are depicted. Also, perimeter planting strips bordering public street rights-of-way may be required depending on final parking area locations. The concept plan proposes ample parking. Fire Rescue/Utilities -The Vinton Department of Public Works reports that both public water and sanitary sewer service are available to the property. Regarding fire and rescue travel time, afour-to-eight minute trip can be expected for emergency vehicles. C. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN The proposed site is designated Core by the county's 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This designation limits institutional uses based on the following land use determinants: 1) accessibility; 2) population center; 3) land use pattern; 4) existing zoning; and 5) urban sector. Regarding land use pattern and existing zoning, little commercial and no high-density residential uses have been developed in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD With minor modifications, the proposal can comply with the zoning ordinance and accompanying standards. Site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans must be reviewed and approved. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request to construct a building for religious assembly is generally consistent with the Core designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. COUNTY OF ROAfVOKE~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 8rambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): O REZONING ®SPECIAL USF ~ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Address: P.O, Box p, Jeffry Parkhi 11 1034, Roanoke, Virginia Phone: 703-342-4002 Zip Code: 24005 Owner's name: House of Prayer Trustees Address: p, 0, Box 21, Vinton, Virginia Phone: y03-890-284 Zip Code: 24170 Location of property: Intersection Hardy Road and Tax Map Number: #71.07-1-26.2 Feather. Road and _ Temple _ Magisterial District: ~ fN.~.o~ Community Planning Area: ~[ (,V .~rl? Size of parcel (s): 2 ~ ~ acres l02)GL'~O sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R-1 Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Zoning: R-1 For Staff Use Only Proposed Land Use: Rel ig.io;u's~ Rsseribly;= 250~seat~ ipitlal~.sanctuary, ~'= use Type: classrooms, administration (300 seat total expansion) fellou~ship ~ . Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) _ Non of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. w v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application '°`"-` Metes and bounds description ~-~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~(~ `~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent y.~the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ ~~ ` ~-~ ~ ( ~-T For staff use only ' _ G~"'" PO! $la1Y Use On/v. Case Ni~mhnr {1.7~ y~ - - - ~ _ •~': ~~ii:' icl. t~'J~... ~j•....ty' ~~'~~.¢.~.ry.'~.1• •'•.•~.•fi'..~... •'.. ~.E'.'.'.'.'.'•'.•.'.' ~'.'''~'~''' ~'~..-~~ ~. ~i3..~' ~' ~'.' ~'~..' ~"~~i~'iE''~~'~F'~.~'~' ~:3''''"'''''''''' ~'~' ~' ~' ~ ~' ~' ~':"~'"~~~' ~' ~' ~~~: ~' ~' :::::::::::::::::::: i:::::::::::::: Applicant D. Jeffry Parkhill Hughes Associates Architects for House of Prayer The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please ans~~ver the following questions as thoroughl,r as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Religious Assembly facilities are compatible and consistant with the neighborhood conservation land use. The property would be undesirable as a residential development due to the proximity to both (lardy Road and Feather Road (major through fares). riease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Religious facilities are permitted in the R-1 districts by special use permits. This property is restricted by .purchase covenants to be either single family residential or religious facilities. Two adjoining properties are already religious facilities. This site is located closer to the geographical center of the House of Prayer conclregation. Nlease describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. This project would have little impact on the adjoining properties or the surround area. Traffic patterns would be "off peak" due to the schedule of services and activities. tJater and sewer is available. Usage would be equal or less than a comparable residential development. Schools, parks,recreation areas would not be impacted. `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ YfQAYA 'J1Wf0'~ X01{ N I I I I ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ n aaaa ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ j ~ r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Q ~~ . ~ Q A $ Q> ry ~ ~ ~ w F-~ ~ r Q, ry ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~Q ^ ~~ W Ul ~ ~ z ~ ~ O Q ~ ry O ~ r ~ ~ m ~ N ~ '~ Y~ } ~ N ~ ~? q~ ~ z ~Z ~ ~ Q ~ V ~~ $ z a H ~ Q z ~~ N ~ ~j Q ~ ~ N F- -u ~ ~ `~ ~ Q ~ ~i5 ~ ~ ~ ~ > F- c~ ll~ F ~ ~I ~3 •I ~( sue,. ROAH02CE COIINTY DTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 18 Play 1994 Name of A licant ~` Jeffry Parkhill PP _H„nhac Accnr-s~'p~grrhitects Phone_f7n~l ~a~_4C1.02 Address of Applicant PLO: Box -1034; Roanoke, Vi.rgini.a 2.40.05 Name of Developer_ House of Pra yer Phone (7031 890-2842 Address of Developer_ P,O. Box 21 , Vinton, Virginia 24179 - Name of_ Design Engineer- Hughes Associates Archit. Phone_(703) 34240.02 Address of Design ErigineerP,O.. Box 1034, Roanoke, Virginia 24005 Name of Contact Person D.. Jeffry Parkhill Name of Proposed Development- House of Prayer Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Phase I ., 250 seat sanctuary Sri:th administrative space (2 offices) and Sunday school classrooms,( ) ..r-. Phase II -Additional classrpom space and 40 X 60 felloaishio hall Phase III - Tnter~or sanctuary expansion to X00 total seating capacity and expansion of fellowship hall to 60 X 1QQ family life center Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND~PLANIMETRIC Nt7i~~ER): Hardy Road at in PrePrtinn of Faathpr ana~ and Temple.-RAac~ Size of proposed development in acres: 2•~J Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? ~_ No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) . Signature of Applicant _ -~ _ _ _' ~~_ _ c a Goo `~ -- ,/ ~ J ~• ~- - .1, ob cd G° I II ~ \ _. 0~d1°F°°~°Ke I I i :~ ~ i n '•..- N• ~ II ., -, m. ,. _. , I - ~ _~ ~ _ ., Q 1 t~bb N • f 1\ • ~~1 / Q /• ,, • ~ \ ~ ~ / S~ t O Q ~i o,\r • O ; N•~,. ` _ ~ y ^ / ~` f 1 I) ~ Q v \ OO r ~~• ~~1 ~~ F ~ I ~i R ~ ~ ~ ~y N ' .r ~ o~\ ,~ ~ 3 : 3~ •~~r o I 6S~ ~ ~ 1 ti titi M • e •f 1 ~ ; y ~ N o N ~ _v. ~~ - ------ .. -•- -- -......_ ~ ~ •• t I ~ - :~ ` , e ° ~I ~ wj P • ~ ~ '~-- '` .r v ~ \ N ` ~ Q '~~ n. 1 ~, ~ a \ ` k~ ~`•'?~~ I •t C ~ ~ _ M •- ~~ 7 lI ~ ~ 1, ~~ 1 ~ _J. ; _ 11' ~. ~ I ~ ``L.___.__~_ _. _. __ _ __ ..~ .. ~~. ~, ~ ~ ~ I, %: t 1 ` ~l•~ __..~~_._.~.._.~_.__.__ • ..._ _ _~_. 1~ ~ . I. ` I. ~O _ i ~ v o . n err, / ~ 1ti~ G- • O • N' • O O~ '- ..__.~~__..______..__.. _. ~ j I Q "- w- NORTH ~~__• ._ y .;er .~~ as a.ur • Y \ .a •' I.e TL~O ~ r ape 1'..00 1 W ~ 11 ~ ~ f. y •Kr - a . ,... .. . r - _ :. t 't i O .r ~ da+ a.ar M aKr 1 ~ / ~. ~ , lrr al / as ...r ya i nw a =~~ liM [I ` aa.r s w + 6 ~~ .~ r ~ l ~ ` a a . ,,,a ~'~' *.. l. ~~ a ~ .. a e... as leao • 3 e..rni~.._ .- . m ~ ~ ry e~ ~+... ae.l a _ ~ - ey a.. r a q • 4 • ~. y. w ~ KI ` ~ 1 e ~ ~~}~ i M o \ ! L ~ 1 e>4 .. . . `~ _ I . . ~ ~.r _ r I _ ~~- ~ _~ - - '' yr T~ 1` _' 1 ~` I ~ +' _ a 1 \~ ! I I ~ I+w r l - a.asr a.. ~ a.r erw 1 1 1 a.w ~.. r. 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~,\. {\ ~1 1 11 ~ ! I/ a..aa r f 1 1l l l a. r rr. / / O I! // 11 /! /1 // ~/ '~ ' _ _ ~~ * DEPARTMEN'T' pg pl,~~~I~TG SET/T/OVER : 77. JEF~Ry P.d,~KN/~L ~~ ' AND ZONING lXOvs~ pF p,Q~ ~/E,~ T~7i•S~~s~ TdXNAPNUM/~R.' ~Il•G'I-- /-~le.~, 1(~~L/G/DUS ASSFMBL-y ,.o ~f .. M /~~M1~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO D. JEFFRY PARRHILL TO CONSTRUCT A FACILITY FOR RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING CLASSROOMS AND FELLOWSHIP HALL TO BE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF FEATHER ROAD AND TEMPLE DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 71.06-1-26.2), VINTON MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, D. Jeffry Parkhill has filed a petition to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1 ~"' 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to D. Jeffry Parkhill to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District. r\wp51\agenda\zoning\parkhill 2 '=3 CORRECTED COPY - REMOVED "WITH CONDITIONS" FROM TITLE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.76 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HOLLINS ROAD BETWEEN TINKERBELL LANE AND LOIS LANE (TAX MAP NO. 39.09- 1-4 AND 4-1) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held July 26, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.76 acre, as described herein, and located on Hollins Road between Tinkerbell Lane and Lois Lane, (Tax Map Number 39.09-1-4 and 4.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument on the east edge of the old County Road, corner to Showalter and H. P. Hinman; thence a new line N. 38 deg. 45 min. 00 sec. W. 117.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 30 deg. 45 min. 00 sec. W. 296.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 59 deg. 15 min. E. 67.50 feet to a concrete monument on the line of the said H. P. Hinman in the old County Road; thence with the Hinman line N. 40 deg. 22 sec. E. 42.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 49 deg. 38 min. E. 14.00 feet to a concrete monumennt; thence N. 35 deg. 45 sec. E. 217.00 feet to the beginning, containing 0.603 of an acre, and as shown by plat made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, dated November 24, 1976; and being the same property conveyed unto William G. Bryant and Jewell C. Bryant, husband and wife, from Pauline R. Bolling and Ernest C. Bolling, her husband, by deed dated November 22, 1977, of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1081, page 341; AND BEGINNING at a point on Hollins Road (State Route 601); said point being shown as point #1 on the hereinafter referenced plat; thence with a new division line through the property of the David W. Hinman Estate N. 34 deg. 36 min. 20 sec. W. 105.28 feet to a point at the southern corner of the property of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation N. 41 deg. 00 min. 00 sec. E. 351.25 feet to a point; thence with the line of other property owned by Adrian L. Anglin, Jr. and Debra G. Anglin N. 36 deg. 22 min. 30 sec. E. 217.00 feet to a point; thence again with the property of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation N. 45 deg. 44 min. 00 sec. E. 347.33 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Hollins Road; thence with Hollins Road the following four courses and distances: S. 24 deg. 31 min. 30 sec. W. 297.72 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right with a chord bearing S. 32 deg. 50 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 192.86 feet; thence S. 41 deg. 08 min. 30 sec. W. 294.39 feet to a point; thence S. 47 deg. 47 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 171.33 feet to the place of beginning, containing 2.163 acres, as more particularly shown on a plat dated August 21, 2 1984, prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ar. 1' • ~ ~~ E.'.p., ;..`.•vT..w7~A ~y ~~ SWAI[R O-K~~ 7 \\ ~}>~ o~ 616 j ~~w„ ..Q~~ V!LAnC~'aannoorY.e+a~~g~~ I( [. / ~. ~~~ ,Ins ~ ~ ~t7•t- ~ • 1 A4U I ~ 1 4`O's? .b iN r `~{ '•cr- I ° °~+BC,G •. /' `~ c ~~ v pt rc;~~-~ ~ 11 •. ~? BROGR~ o~ r ~.IN~~ d ' ~••• ~ .ir3J ~ r Y ut•1 - _ :: i i VISIa HEIGHTS ~ -.. r / ./ ',~,~ . ``~ 1~8 s' f ~ l1,~ ~'- ..$ oEa~~ i ~. ~S "°r ~ ~,///~} ti_ ~' •r' ice'' T O','~~*o°~~• d ~f~ t\~1~ fir.... o ~"~ J~. i ~~~%`•.--i$° ~-.1-~._~„ ~~~ V I C 1 N I ~L.MtnE~„ •o ~ 1/ _,~.. ~ .~ ~ ~^ T Y MAP ~:~-1, 3 '~ • .o ~:~ ~1_ NORTH _ A~ * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~T/T/D~/t~2: RKE. CO. ~7Fi~T.' t~ fCO~IGN/C D~~/. ~~ " AND ZONING Ti(X MA 7° /~lor : 3 9 r Q 9 - ~ - ~ Q nab ~ ~. • REQUEST: .,. ~zo~/,~ ,2-/ ~o .~-/ ~M ~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CASE NUMBER: 20-7/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 5, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 26, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development to rezone 2.76 acres from R-1 to I-1 to construct a warehouse distribution facility located on Hollins Road between Tinkerbell Lane and Lois Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the dwelling on the property and the location of the construction entrance. Stewart Hubbell with Mattern & Craig responded as follows: the house has been demolished and the construction entrance is located at the old driveway. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report ~ Other Terrance H 'ngton, cretary Roanoke unty Planning Comnssion STAFF REPORT Case Number: 20/7/94 Prepared by: T. Harrington ~~~ Applicant: Roanoke County Department of Economic Development Date: June 27, 1994 PART I B. DESCRIPTION This is a request submitted by the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development on behalf of Hanover Direct/Domestications. The purpose of the request is to rezone a 2.76 acre site from R-1 to I-1, so that the site can be incorporated into the Hanover Direct development plan. Hanover is currently constructing a distribution facility on an adjacent 54 acres of land. The approval of this request would allow this property to be used for a portion of the parking and loading areas proposed by Hanover. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. The I-1 zoning district allows a wide variety of industrial uses, including warehousing and distribution. 2. Site plan review will need to be finalized for any development occurring on this site. 3. Access to the site is not proposed to occur from this parcel thus no commercial entrance permit will be required for this 2.76. acres. +d ~1 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area- The site is approximately 2.76 acres in size. If approved, this parcel will be incorporated into the development plans for the adjacent 54 acres currently under development. 2. Location and Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning- I-1 zoned land lies adjacent to this property on all sides. The adjacent properties are either currently under development for industrial uses, or are undeveloped. 3. Existing Use and Condition of the Property- Until recently, the property was used for a single family residence. With the purchase of the property by Hanover Direct, the use of the property as a residence stopped. 4. Access- There will be no direct access to Hollins Road from this property. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. This property will be used for a small portion of the parking and loading areas associated with the Hanover Direct development on the adjacent 54+ acres. The conceptual plan submitted with the application shows no portion of the proposed building within this 2.76 acres. ., C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1. This small parcel is designated as Transition in the County~s Comprehensive Plan. All of the I-1 property that surrounds this tract was designated as Principal Industrial by Roanoke County in 1989. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS ., 1. The rezoning of this property to industrial is appropriate given its location and intended use as part of the Hanover Direct development. COUNTY OF R~OANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 /y~ (703} 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only ~ ~~°~ date tg~ ' ad: received bv: a plie tioh ( / PC/BZA date: 7 placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: n Y ~-7 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE D VARIANCE Applicant's name: Roanoke County Department of Economic Development Phone: 772-2055 Address: 5204 Bernard Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code:24018 Owner's name: Hanover Direct/Domestications c/o Mr. Bob Rhudy Phone: 977_7777 Address: 1 Avery Row Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Zip Code: Location of property: Hollins Road, Tax Map Number: (s) 39.09-1-4 & 4.1 adjoini ( d ng an proposed as a portion) of the Hanover Direct Magisterial District: Hollins project.. Community Planning Area: peters Creek Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R1 Low Density Residential District 2.76 acres Existing Land Use: Single family residential sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: I-1 Industrial District Forscaffuse only Proposed Land Use: Warehouse distribution Use Type:_ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES _ g NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If;rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO x ............................................................................................... Variance of Sections} of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: N/A Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 "concept plan Application fee Application ,~ Metes and bounds description ~~„ Proffers, if applicable Justification '~`f Water and sewer a lication Ad'oinin pp ~ g property owners /hereby certify that / am either th owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the kno a ge an t of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ Agent For Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant Roanoke County Department of Economic Development on behalf of Hanover Direct/ Domestications The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district-classification in the zoning ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SHEET Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. _.- According to the Future Land Use map located in the Planning Department, the property is identified as either Development or Transition. - In regards to the Development designation the land adjacent as well as the land across Hollins Road has been either zoned or used for industrial purposes for quite some time. With this in mind and the existence of established residential and commercial development in the area, some change in the Land Use Plan may be necessary. The general description found in the land use principles of the Transition category seem somewhat more appropriate than do the principles descn'bed in the Development designation. And while the Transition ,designation does not specifically mention industrial warehousing as a use the proposed project does provide for a logical extension to areas existing development patterns. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Impact upon the site in question, the adjoining properties and the surrounding area will be minimal since Hanover Direct/Domestications is already in the process of building a distribution center on land they currently own. The impact of not rezoning the property would be that Hanover would build a smaller facility and the sale of the property in question would then be terminated. If this were to occur, then Hanover would simply build a retaining wall to divide the property. In addition, when VDOT purchases land to widen Hollins Road they would negotiate with the owners of the property in question for a portion of the property. This would further isolate this residentially zoned property. ~ ~ 3. Facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; Purpose three is met by creating an environment that is harmonious with the existing and proposed business environment. Thus, the cross purposes of the business environment and the residentially- zoned tract (soon to be vaca_n_ t) will be eliminated allow_ ing the movement of goods and services in a convenient and effective manner. 7. Encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; Purpose seven is met by the creation of 450 jobs with an annual payroll of $12,500,00. In addition, the construction of a 530,000 square foot facility with a value of over $12,000,000 will generate annual property taxes of over $135,000. Additional taxes will be generated through the collection of sales taxes on purchases made by Virginia residents. The site is free from flooding, has access to water and sewer, abuts a state road that recently received STAA approval for truck traffic, and has been designated by the ,County as its top priority in regards to improvements. Land abutting each side of tax parce139.09-1-4 & 4.1 is either used for industrial purposes and so zoned or vacant industrially zoned land. ~.: County of Roanoke Department of Economic Development (703) 772-2069 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning FRO r'an T. Duncan, Assistant Director DATE: May 24, 1994 SUBJECT: Request to rezone 2.76 acres for Hanover Direct Please accept the attached rezoning application as prepared by the Department of Economic Development for the benefit of Hanover Direct and more specifically, its Domestications warehouse on Hollins Road. I will serve as the agent for the purpose of submitting the necessary documentation for this rezoning application. Mr. Dan Horner, Mrs. Maryellen Goodlatte, and Mr. Bob Rhudy will be available to answer any questions that may arise during the entire process. As you know Hanover Direct-Domestications announced that they would build a 450,000 square foot warehouse/distribution facility on roughly 54 acres along Hollins Road this past February. Because of attractive building costs and changes within the Domestications business plan, a 530,000 square foot facility is now being considered for the first phase of this project. As you may recall, Hanover has agreed to conditions within the public-private partnership that would penalize Hanover if they failed to have a facility of at least 1,000,000 square feet in total after the third year of occupancy of phase 1. In order to accomplish this, they have found it necessary to purchase the Anglin property (tax parcels 39.09-1-4 & 4.1) along Hollins Road and the south eastern border of Hanover's existing tract. I hope that this brief summary of the reasons for this purchase and ultimately this rezoning request, answers some of your questions. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments that you, your staff, or that the Planning Commission may have. ~~ -~ ~\ c y W ~ Z Z O W N 3 ~ / \ 6 U Q U F"' V ~ ~ W ~ 2 /~' ~~m~ LL ' O = ~ ~ i LL ~ / 1 ' \ i \ .\ _ _ t0 ~,,~ Q ~ O .r N ' /~ _. ~ Q S ,a LL LL I` I I I f I I fr ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I r ~ I I ~ a I I ~~ I I ~ I I I I \ - - - - - T -1 J **This project has already been designed by Roanoke County's Utility Department. Forward all information to Gary Robertson.: .• ROAH0ICE COUNTY DTILITY DEP?~RTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date May 24, 1994 ~' ,~ Name of Applicant Han overs Direct /Domestic ations Phone 977-7777 Address of Applicant_ 1 Avery Row Roanoke , Virg inia 24012 Name of Developer_ Gamma Phone Address of Developer_. Name of Design Engineer Horner and Assoc. Phone 989-9655 Address of •Design Engineer 2721 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24019 Name of Contact Person _grian T. Duncan Name of Proposed Development Domestications distribution facility Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Construction of 530,000 square foot distribution facility Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP P.ND PLPNIMETRIC NL~ ER): Hollins Road Size of proposed development in acres: 56 Acres*Includes the ~ 2.76 acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Finished floor elevation will be 1,046.5' Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No :~ Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) ~ Agent. . N Signat re of Applican t :~~/r~~ •~ )• 1\\~ •~' ~ ~ ~( r ~ \~/`••~I,HOLLINS~~0~.j11~64. %.' .e• ~['_d•~~a`~\~ ~ij /„a.' d ./ 7, '~ r •~~) !! / ~~~~ • i ,//4~~~~\'i)A )~~' /~ _~\~- ~P 1~1 n 4//t_~~° ~1 ~~ / ~Q /' p ~f ~o ~'' / "~ \ alrond. `\.1136 ~~ ••` ii • ~ ~ ~\~ ~~~, li l3 ~~.Eno/^ /-_~ ,_./~ ~ \ - ~-` ~` ~~ / • r (~_~l 1 ~ ~ r~ pQ~,y_~~ \ ~.~ ~\ ~\ • ~ .,- •~~~~-\i~\~,.1, ~ _ ~C.a~ i~'~' 7 •/~/ ^601 i j-~ •\~, G ~ %• ~ ~ • ~0~~ ~~ mil, .• ~ ~• _ ~'~`6 (\~~, \~ st '.; .~.v; cDr y'n~ •' , ~~~• .l~l eon ~;~•..•' •~"'!••~~.~~~' , ~ ~~~ •, •(' 1 ~~ ~ :~ 605 ~~/'/~~ ~~ -~hea•~S~ hrl~ ~, •,• .O •~`~ ;,i• j:\' \ 1 I ~.j'~:,\•. ~~ .. ~" % (O~ _ / `~~z ~- ~ .\;.. •~ ~ A ~ , ° j, ~, „ <~.~ ~~ ~,. ti 1- - 1. ' ~ ~ ~ ~. • ~ ~_-r~ ' ~ .~' ~ ~c~~' ~ r / ~ .: - o + •. ~ ~ ( ~ ; In ) ,° ..;~ M Burl /p55 ° ,~ ~a:> ./:/. ~(HO111I1 ~ r~~j, ~ ,~~~~~~ ~,/~2') i~a .~ •~ 1095_Sch ~ ~: ~ ~ ~l• i~ ° ~ %: ~• ~•~ • (J c' it C• r-a°-' tt, \\- •\ 1. 1'.%~'•~%J ~ •/ ••\II_y,..j'~O .~ •~'•~~ 601i~ l.. \j~:fl~ ~ / / 1 _ ./, ) ._ _ \~` =.~~ ill .'.1. `', ~1~ I ~ ~i:ih YR~eW ~L~ _ G•' ~ ~'xL/88 ~ a ~/ ~ ~ /~/ ~ / ~ ~° ~, ~ ~~~ \~ ~ i~• ~ •u ei anL c ~~~'~ ~\~'~-- ~~C/fr` .~( ((I i~ ~ ~~10.1 // ~~ I ~ ;: :~ h• `Tombsto e t• ,\lt,• .11 ;~~.• lI ~(~ (// 00 ~ ego /~/ ,`0 1~\~~~_~%~~•~•' ~. ~~ ~ •\ \,~ I \lountam Vie :iJ---- •• 1i~ r•J~~~ \ r//~J!~ 1%~+ ~,.~~~ ~--'~ m `~~` -~. `~ ` i~~l ~ ) 1 sl •~ ;~~\ :yam= ( r/y J .: a ~ ;r, _ ..dens ;, \ ° p. / 1 ~' o'. ~ \~'. qq .r. r:,.~' \/o°~ %~l/ / ~ '.~ f~' I'r I \ I y r ~~ `~ %%//~~~1'11 ~ ~ y~~. °-A i, ~ ~ 1 °~ \\ I) 601 f ~• ~: ~~~- '~ -a /• a. ~~ 625 ,~" % q• :r `~ l.'• ~ ~~_~ • ;~~ j ti ~ !~ ~ ~~\ I ~• ~ i . /'' , Vii/ /U~ to ter y/ ^L. .i l~ ~ ~~~ Crossraads..b)a \ •^_ ~ ° x/ /os Seh;'') ~, I15 r j • ~ ~2 2'~ ~ ' ,/~, St>'oPPi g C rater ~. s ~` z - I ~ ~ ~ ~~-..•: l \• ' ~_ ~ z - - ,•.,~~ i ~ ~~ 6R ~ /~ ~ ~ I it I : ! • ~~\ ~. yi (l\ ' i"~•.~ r .' ;~ \ "\ p~ ~,~ ~'~` ~^ ~ ~ ~Oj~. f ~~, ~ (pp~/ •~ ~!Il V ';i:• .~~ .'may'.' (l(~.' ..' V T. q% - .\\• •~,/g ~ TON ( A II l~.'C •ll • -~: ' ~ (/ r~ t01 .. • ~ (' ~ t \^ µ v .O ~ ~ 11111\ recto Par \ 1 ( ~~ ~` •./ •~ \ ~'~~ ~°.p IC~, 'nGG~~ ~ ,ave ;o~~: =-ar _ 6 olf ~ nurse ~, c, ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ /• ~>~ P ~' f / pg p ~ ~••ilY ~ ~\ _ _ _ ~ n /O Mont e,~\pp •v o' ~~,. \ ~ 3' ~ Hollins RJ` .•O .I _~'' Sch^"~~ "~ /P" e ~`~ n) IN ,~.~,~'` C/jl I / r• /~. /7 (. ~_ it o° ~~ Or nd tP ~ ~,...-.- n ~'f: J~ ITz31"~ iy/~!l/ ,~\/ 1\.1i~ ~ Knund Hill \~ ~ ~ ~~~~ IL---' \-i ~I L.-O ~ ~ ~-J _ ~~~••: ~ 717 ~~ h ~~: ~, - ., ~'\ ~ ~, 1 ~~ ! ~ ~ 11. _ •.'~ --- _ o a~rAr ~ ` 1 • ?._. ~.o~ ~ ~:~,1 WA7 FR _WKr10 ~ a ~ r~yyJ" y 6~6 ' ~~. ,... G:~aT SUtI ~Al1.EY ::..: _' ~ ~ ~ ~ fT~ C - r ...: ` ~~ .`J0.{ ~j fzaMrcc ~~? a*a. ~4 4 tTQ /' ~ J~~~.°4v,v9 ,,.,~'b:L1~nL`SN'au ¢wor~~ow.~~g .MI~Et•~ti G ~ \ ~~~.vtlWff~(+ ~\4y~. , o~'nFw~r, SAC ~~_~l+u+ooe ~ t57 ~ i' `` ~ .uLL ; ~~~ ~ i~ s, .~ '•~ m R' rc;~a a o~,9 • .. /~ ~ ~ ~\ < ~ ~,~ / jTT~ ~'•~O`"o Ts4 ..°~\~V'i.;t~.~v ~ .»...~,i~io~p ~~ - ~ /.'` ~j i ~ i I I '~~~j. ?y ~cta~t~ ~ / r ~ 3. 0 ..~ .~,.~ .__... V I C I N I T Y MAP ~:~~-%lr 3. .~~~_,..."--_ ..o ~~ --l„"~~ f ~ r ~ ir^ '4 - r.. • ~ ~ ' .~ r_ v ~ l w = ~ ~ i - w O, . y 4. is .r y r fr ~. .y. t~ ~.»... ~.. - 8 r f ~ ' Y M M y Y ~ ~ r y 1 ~s - , ~ i w... _.. r .r .+ O ' ~n a•-rs r•rs e ~ ry of ' ~~ _ 1~OA~oKE ~~ a J ~' a~ ~~ - ~~~ v •r ., _~~ ~ ~~~ -1 _•._ ,~ * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG ~TiTio~/CQ.r RKE. Co. r~Er~T. c~ ~co~cti//c Day. ~~ ' AND ZONING i ~i X MA P /~o.: 3 9 ~ O ~' - l - ~ ct n~ - /~. ~ ' R~G~uESi ,,, ~zo~/,~ ,2-J ~o I-/ rw a~-r L r-r '1"- 3 Q NORTH I4 .~ +• ~ Jf /' // ~lii r-i „ ~\ \ ~ \ ~,\ti o - ~~~ ~~~c ~, t i ~ ~ "~~ -; `f ~' C Z ~ ''~=' r / rn yr•. f. r.w ' l . =j fj~ ~. ~~~ ~r .~~v.~L .~'- ! ~~ JA .. G'!T y o F ~a,a~cK~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.76 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HOLLINS ROAD BETWEEN TINKERBELL LANE AND LOIS LANE (TAX MAP NO. 39.09-1-4 AND 4-1) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held July 26, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.76 acre, as described herein, and located on Hollins Road between Tinkerbell Lane and Lois Lane, (Tax Map Number 39.09-1-4 and 4.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument on the east edge of the old County Road, corner to ~°z'"" ~ . e.. Showalter and H. P. Hinman; thence a new line N. 38 deg. 45 min. 00 sec. W. 117.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 30 deg. 45 min. 00 sec. W. 296.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 59 deg. 15 min. E. 67.50 feet to a concrete monument on the line of the said H. P. Hinman in the old County Road; thence with the Hinman line N. 40 deg. 22 sec. E. 42.00 feet to a concrete monument; thence S. 49 deg. 38 min. E. 14.00 feet to a concrete monumennt; thence N. 35 deg. 45 sec. E. 217.00 feet to the beginning, containing 0.603 of an acre, and as shown by plat made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Certified Land Surveyors, dated November 24, 1976; and being the same property conveyed unto William G. Bryant and Jewell C. Bryant, husband and wife, from Pauline R. Bolling and Ernest C. Bolling, her husband, by deed dated November 22, 1977, of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1081, page 341; AND BEGINNING at a point on Hollins Road (State Route 601); said point being shown as point #1 on the hereinafter referenced plat; thence with a new division line through the property of the David W. Hinman Estate N. 34 deg. 36 min. 20 sec. W. 105.28 feet to a point at the southern corner of the property of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation N. 41 deg. 00 min. 00 sec. E. 351.25 feet to a point; thence with the line of other property owned by Adrian L. Anglin, Jr. and Debra G. Anglin N. 36 deg. 22 min. 30 sec. E. 217.00 feet to a point; thence again with the property of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation N. 45 deg. 44 min. 00 sec. E. 347.33 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Hollins Road; thence with Hollins Road the following four courses and distances: S. 24 deg. 31 min. 30 sec. W. 297.72 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right with a chord bearing S. 32 deg. 50 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 192.86 feet; thence S. 41 deg. 08 min. 30 sec. W. 294.39 feet to a point; thence S. 47 deg. 47 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 171.33 feet to the place of beginning, containing 2.163 acres, as more particularly shown on a plat dated August 21, 1984, prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect -r-s thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.hollins.rd 1 ~ ~_ ~ l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MONA S . SUTPHIN TO CONSTRUCT A PRIVATE HORSE STABLE LOCATED AT 4041 BARLEY DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 65.00-2-43.6), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Mona S. Sutphin has filed a petition to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Mona S . Sutphin to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District, subject to the following condition: 1 a) There shall be no more than five horses kept on the property. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 1+t 'AlJ-ngr; .. _ lf17 c'_ / ~^~ 639 ara cvciws / /4 ~~ / • ~ `y r I `P~o ~ \~ HILL' ~/! ~w.p ,..fie ~ ~w ~;$,NQGMTS ~ _ _ -w a M 1 ~ s +ST S lE \~ •; Y fOp'ST k ! ..~ \~ ~ 31 I ~~. St~Fr. M~S ~.1 I ':~(i ~.~ IN.'J$!i~L: ~ CN i.4R 3 ` iZl i FOR:SC \\ I - - -- ------ \~~- -. _ ___._. '~"° I~ VICINITY MAP ~~~ I'~ N ~; x ~\~O'~ 7.41 AC 5.94 Ac ` ~~'~' ;, • s.~,ooo ~ ~ ~~ 43.8 ~ / goer ,. +ua 51~ ,4.s / Io7/ r ~foo S16 Ae • ro Ae 44 ~~ ~ 3 43.2 4srs 43.9 • 43{k q 291~c nt / /3Ae~ ~~~ •P 43.4 8.03 Ae S.I6 Ae T.OS Ae •~ ~,/ 43.5 7.77Ae ~ ,~u ~iJa 4310 53 ,~ 8.48 AC 9A1 Ae p M 2.2 °. s. • •4u ~._ o° 41 4j4f ~ 4 ~ °~•a 43.11 _ G~ ~ ~~00• a 32:iAe C°~~. ~ M.99 Ae ~~ ~i • ^ A . 11t/ ~7 O 3.12 S•• Mop 64.02 1 Ac ~+ 1• • 200' ~ ; 36 ~ ~ . ~ .~~ 09Ac ml / t 101 62AC lC) L--~` i .36Ae /. 42.31 Ae , 2L 63Ae u ~~~ ' ~ ~~ / / • ~• ~ ~ 3w Mop 5503 ~ 43 \ 1^^ 200' Sw Map 54 4 I , 45 22.64 Ac I 48 47 ` 23.60 Ae mot! 1••200' ~~~• I ~A ~ rl• 9 !0 1 ,a,><i 64 ~ 4 Ae rc - Q + / , 43.1 ) .. '~• ~~ al ~~ / ~~_~ 4ep^ab ~+• s•= I , ( I1 i 5.4 ap 64.04 ~ / •• 2~, / 37 ~ ~ ar.6S Ae 38 aa2i Ae to) 38.63Ae lCI ' '-\ a 9 12.9 •~~ 1~TiTio~/~R; MoNA S. S~-TPtI!~I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNII~TG T.ax MAP NCM/3ER.' Lr~, DD - 2 - ~ 3, (~ - ~~ AND ZONING • ~2~r~u~r.' SPEC/A,~ G5~ PE,c'M/T- "' ~'IP~ /AT~ ~itBLE PETITIONER: MONA SUTPHIN CASE NUMBER: 21-7/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: July 5, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 26, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of Mona S. Sutphin for a Special Use Permit to construct a private horse stable located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about access to the site. Staff replied that applicant's primary access to the property will be by means of the cul-de-sac. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. There shall be no more than five horses kept on the property. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt expressed concern that half of the property is pastureland and said that the number of horses allowed on the site should be lowered from staffs recommendation. He moved to recommend approval of the petition with the following condition: There shall be no more than five horses kept on the property. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Hooker F. DISSENTING PEILSPEC'TIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H ngton,~cretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission Y-'j MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 5, 1994 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JANET SCHEID, PLANNER -~ RE: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE NUMBER: 21-7/94 MONA SUTPHIN Nature of Request The applicant, Ms. Mona Sutphin is requesting a special use permit to allow a private stable on a 9.87 acre tract located at 4041 Barley Drive, in the Catawba Magisterial District. The front portions of this property is relatively flat and is currently in pasture. The back portion of this site is forested. Background This specific piece of property is located in a subdivision known as West Salem Forest. This property is currently vacant and is zoned R-1. -Apvlicable Recrulations a 1. The Roanoke County Ordinance, Section 30-47-2, allows ~~ private stables with a special use permit and additional use and design standards which require: (1) a minimum lot size of 2 acres; (2) a limit of no more than one stable animal per acre if the lot is less than five acres; (3) stables and corrals must comply with setback requirements for accessory buildings; (4) animal waste must be property managed. 2. Private stables are defined in the ordinance, Section 30- 29-1 as the "keeping, breeding, or raising of horses or ponies exclusively for the personal use and enjoyment of the owner or occupant of the property or the riding of horses or ponies by the owner or occupant of the property and their guests". 3. Applicant intends to build a house on this property. She will be required to either build the house prior to building the stable or concurrently. 4. Building permits will be required for both the house and the stable. '~r Staff Report Case #21-7/94 Page 2 As noted in #2 above, private stables .are defined by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as only being for the use of horses and ponies. Therefore, other types of stable animals or farm animals are not permitted. Since applicant's property is 9.87 acres there is no limitation on the number of stable animals allowed. Surrounding Area The general area is a mixture of industrial and large lot residential uses. Adjoining this property to the west is I-2 zoning. In the immediate area are other stable animals, a plant nursery establishment, railroad tracks, the Roanoke River, the bottling plant, and Koppers Company, Inc. Recommended Conditions Since only a portion of this property is in pasture land and this property is part of a subdivision, the number of horses and ponies on this property should be limited to no more than ten. e For staff use onlsr ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (7031 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date receive received by: CC ~~ %% application fee~y PC/BZA date: 5,~ ' ~ placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: .-. f / s v ~ Check type of application file (check all that apply): ^ REZONING SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Phone: 3~{ s' ~ ~ 1 Address: ~~ ~ ` '~ Zip Code: a ~ ~ ; N Owner's name: j~-y~,~ ;-~ Phone: ~ ~ 5 -~ ~ ~, Address: { ,c; ~~ ~~~ a(J L ~~ ~ D~~ r~~ J Zip Code:a ~(5... Lo c operty: Q~~ a-tion of pr ax Map Number: ~~ ~j - Z -i...4~ , (o - } (~ ~}~ C' _ agisterial District: ~-~~~j~ W ES j Sj~-l F.~l` ~ ~'~~ Community Planning Area: ~t-~`ti1VAti, Size of parcel (s): _~.~acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: ~~~~ ~~r-~Tj~"~. (_ ~ .~. Existing Land Use: ~/qcA~ Proposed Zoning: ~ ~ 5 ~~ ~~~~ ~ Proposed Land Use: ~5 t~-u~ ~L VJ ~~- t}K~Y~ s'~-~~~ For Staff Use On/y use type: Does the rcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES _ ~/ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v / Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan / Application fee / Application -. Metes and bounds description /rr' fl' ", .: Proffers, if applicable Justification 1L~ `; Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the . wner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and conserli-ot"t~ner/'' Owner's Signature: . ~ for Staff Use Only: Case Number •~ Applicant 1~~'~i~l~ ~ ~1 `J The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the 1 purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. / ~ ,(.. `~, ~~ V Q (.1Q 5~ i N Cs C~ -~C C ~ I,l~~ ~l ~'~t (~" 1 t ~~~~ ~ rr ~ - - Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County I Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~- v ~ ,~ 1-r'~ ~' 1 .0f ~ y ~ ~t ~ ,C ~! , ro ~ fa~9 ti _f -•„r , . 4 .; , ' o .. o ' ,~ / , o ~• a ~ ~ ,• o ~~ , ~ ~ ~ .••/'~ n d ~' ~ ' / , ~ ~ 'L~ . ..~rq, •/,~O .~~ X11 ~ •9 ~ ~/ CA ~ ~ o d • ~ X49 .: - - 0 New ~ ~~ ~ ,~ _ . ~~ ~ ~ ~s ~ .: - Via. ~„ .~~ •~ ~ ,.p , _ ~ cl~ - ; tip .,• ~ y ~ ~ •~b tS6'~ <~ J ~\ ~~ O ~ a \ ti ~ ,,L Z \ ~~~ • 0~3~~d ~` ,~,L ~. ~ "d'1 •f-. z LS ~ ~ ~'4~ ~ ~ '~4zo ~~c _ ~ ~ ~. ~ N~ 9 ~J~ Nut ~ ,i 44 . . ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ ~ `r O~~O ~ .~ ,~ / ~ • / ~~ ~~ X 4 . ~'° ~.~' w 'AF7t Lx~r: pX/L GVLAN$ ~ FJRcST •:770 /:~ cR5 ~ / ~CC~, ~ ~ C_ FO : / ~~ ~P _ ~/ r ',~ '`,~ /~C O ~((IS ~L ~ C; er _ w~SeIEM fOp/gq_//ST , ko I VICINITY MAP ~,':_. ~iTion/~R: MoNA S, Si.'TP~i'!n~ .: ~~ * - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING TAX MAR NCMr3ER.' GJ5- DD - 2 - 'f 3 ~ to AND ZONING • ~~G?G~cST.' SPEC/fit L. L5~ PEx'til/T '" P2~ VA TF STit BL E -r ~~ D NORTH 1 '~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MONA 8. SUTPHIN TO CONSTRUCT A PRIVATE HORSE STABLE LOCATED AT 4041 BARLEY DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 65.00-2-43.6), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Mona S. Sutphin has filed a petition to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Mona S. Sutphin to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District, subject to the following condition: 1 T~ a) There shall be no more than five horses kept on the property. c:\wp5l\agenda\zoning\sutphin I, r _, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-11 VACATING A SURPLUS PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON AUTUMN PARR DRIVE (PLAT BOOR 15, PAGE 54), AUTUMN PARR SUBDIVISION, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Vaughn Incorporated has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a surplus right- of-way located on Autumn Park Drive in the Autumn Park Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 15, at page 54 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a surplus portion of the right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive in the Autumn Park Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and shown on a plat of record in Plat Book 15, at page 54, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: 1 (a) That a 50-foot right-of-way be retained by the County. (b) That the vacated property be added into and combined with Lot 1 of Autumn Park Subdivi- sion, by recordation of a plat approved by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. (c) That the County reserves and retains a proper- ty interest within the property for use as a 15-foot wide drainage easement; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Vaughn Incorporated shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associat- ed herewith. 4. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, Vaughn Incorporated shall convey by separate instrument to the County a 15-foot wide drainage easement as required in paragraph 1 (c) above. This conveyance shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. The County Administrator is autho- rized to accept this conveyance on behalf of the County. 5. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, 2 r 1 shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by them, their heirs, successors, or assigns. 6. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 72694-11 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote with one absence on Tuesday, July 26, 1994. Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3 .~,~. ~ ~ / , ~ /Q \ ~ J Q~ VISTA FOREST ~(/ P.B. 10, PG. 158 1 ~ /j h "AUTU~tIN PARK' P.B. 13, PG. 34 I 27,J64 S.F. I G .s, m~ yt -~ ~ ~- i i '~~5~~7~~~j LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-1 N33'13'38"f 102.24' CH. 2-3 N39'40 Zi"E 37.11' 3-4 N61'38'38"f 63.60' CH. 4-3 S21'40 s7"E -47.99' CH. 3-6 S31'O1'31"W 46.39' 6-7 S39'40'18"W 104.41' 7-8 53510'33"W 18.44' 8-1 N21'49'OS"W 36.81' TOTAL AREA = 9 490 S.F. 1, ~o ~y o,~ CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA C-1 213.00' 103.13' 31.63' 102.14' N53'ZS'38"E 2T30.34" C-1 85.00' 65.19' 34.?9' 63.60' N61'38'38"f 13'36'34" C-3 T3.00' 64.32' 85.31' 47.99' S11'40'47"E 14T?s'36" PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF AUTUMN PARK DRIVE TO BE VACATED do COMBINED WITH LOT 1 "AUTUMN PARK" D.B. 15, PG. 54 SCALE: 1" = 80' DATE: 13 MAY 1994 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE. VIRGINIA .~ N COMM. X92-414 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate surplus right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive as recorded in Plat Book 15 Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown on the attached map COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• Staff is recommending that the surplus right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive be vacated because the surplus right-of-way is not required for VDOT acceptance. BACKGROUND: The Petitioner, Vaughn Incorporated, the developer and owner of Autumn Park, is requesting the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to vacate the referenced right-of-way (see attached map) . The petitioner is requesting the vacation of the surplus right-of-way, because the previous zoning ordinance would not have permitted the irregular shaped lot because it could not maintain an average lot depth of 100 feet. Since that time, the zoning ordinance has been revised and the lot is no longer required to have a minimum average lot depth, therefore the developer would like to vacate the excess right-of-way and combine the property to lot 1. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Engineering and Inspections has been notified by the Virginia Department of Transportation that they have no objections as long as a 50 foot right-of-way is maintained. Roanoke County is requesting that the referenced right-of-way, as shown on the attached map, be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended by the adoption of the attached ordinance. The Department of Engineering and Inspections has no objections to the proposed vacation on the following conditions: 1. A 50 foot right-of-way is maintained. 2. Residue property is combined to lot 1. 3. County reserves and retains a property interest within the property for use as a 15 foot wide drainage easement . The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; second reading and public hearings are scheduled for July 26, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors vacate the referenced right-of-way and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance and incorporate the above connditions. SUB ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: r~~ ~~ Arnold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspections County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney County Attorney ~ ~ ~ / ~ \ ~ ~ MERIDIAN OF ~ / / Q ~ VISTA FOREST ~/ P.B. 10. PG. 15d cor / \ J O h~ 1 /J \ "AUTULIN PARK' P.B. 15, PG. 54 I 27,164 S.f. I G •s ~~ . yr --~ ~- 9 ~ i i '~`~J'O'~~! LIN£ DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N53'?5'38"E 102.14' CH. Z-3 N39'40? 1 "E 37.41 ' 3-4 N61'38'38"f 63.60' CH. 4-5 S21'40'4r'E 47.99' CH. 5-6 551'01'31"W 46.59' 6-7 S59'40'?8"W 104.41' 7-8 S55'?0'S5"W 48.44' 8- i N22'49'OS"W 36.81 ' TOTAL AREA = 9,490 S.f. 1 , ~o ~y off, CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA " 00' C-1 215 103.13' 51.63' 102.24' N53'15'38'f 1T30'34 " . 00' C-1 85 65.19' 34.29' 63.60' N61'38'38'E ' 43'56'34 " . C-3 25.00' 64.32' 85.51' 47.99' E S22'40'4r 14T?4'36 PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF AUTUMN PARK DRIVE TO BE VACATED do COMBINED WITH LOT 1 ' "AUTUMN PARK" D.B. 15, PG. 54 SCALE: 1" = 80' DATE: 13 MAY 1994 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA nnuu II~O-d9 d /~ 3 ~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE VACATING A SURPLUS PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON AUTUMN PARK DRIVE (PLAT BOOK 15, PAGE 54), AUTUMN PARK SUBDIVISION, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Vaughn Incorporated has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a surplus right- of-way located on Autumn Park Drive in the Autumn Park Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 15, at page 54 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a surplus portion of the right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive in the Autumn Park Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and shown on a plat of record in Plat Book 15, at page 54, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: (a) That a 50-foot right-of-way be retained by the County. ~J (b) That the vacated property be added into and com- bined with Lot 1 of Autumn Park Subdivision, by recordation of a plat approved by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. (c) That the County reserves and retains a property interest within the property for use as a 15-foot wide drainage easement; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Vaughn Incorporated shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, Vaughn Incorporated shall convey by separate instrument to the County a 15-foot wide drainage easement as required in paragraph 1 (c) above. This conveyance shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. The County Administrator is authorized to accept this conveyance on behalf of the County. 5. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by them, their heirs, successors, or assigns. ~„'~ 6. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. vacation\autumn.prk t ~ + T `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE 72694-12 VACATING A 0.004-ACRE AND A 0.002-ACRE PORTION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN PHASE 1 OF WEXFORD SUBDIVISION (PB 16, PAGE 122), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ron Jackson has requested the Board of Superv- isors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate 4.90 feet of a 54.90- foot wide right-of-way located off Homewood Circle in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 16, at page 122 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires what such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 4.90 feet of a 54.90-foot wide right-of-way located off Homewood Circle in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 16, at page 122, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: 1 ,~ (a) A 50-foot right-of-way be retained. (b) That the vacated 0.004-acre parcel be added into and combined with Lot 1 in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision and the 0.002-acre parcel be added into and combined with Lot 20 in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, by recordation of a plat or plats approved by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. (c) That 0.004-acre and 0.002-acre parcels be combined with the adjoining lots; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Ron Jackson shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by him, his heirs, successors, or assigns. 5. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain 2 legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 72694-12 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote with one absence on Tuesday, July 26, 1994. Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3 c 2 -- o.ao4-4c. To REVERT To Go7 / ~n ~ J~ } ~Q ~ ~N ~ W QN~ ~ ~ ~ m ,~ 0 ,~0 ~W ~J~ t~ V ~~0 QV~ ~/ O, 054-AC. REM,4/N/NG /N R/W p v O 0 ~~ ~ ~ j so. ~, N85°o/ Z 4~' ~N 85 7'o TA~,W ~4, LOT 1 WEXFORD NB5°o/'3o"W 2.4~' Pr~asE s P.B. / ~ PG. /ZZ ON .~~ ~ ~\~ ~~ Q h0. C3 °• C~2 dC. Ta REVEL Ta LOT 2~ ~~ J '~~ GoRDOn/ STOBBEC_4.4R N p D.6. /307 PG ~ 35 ~} T.M. Blo. O/-Z -/7 ~ PORT/oN of R/W TD REVERT ?O 0 ~ ,Q LOTS /AND ZO OF GYEXFORD ~ PHASEI P.B./~ PG. /22 AS RECORDED + IN D.B. /44/ PG.G544~t/06~o7 DATE MAY lo, l994. \ \ X07 20 ~ WEXFORD PHASE I P.8 / ~ ~ l22 CLRYE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORD BEARING I /O/° O/' OZ" 4p.G10 70.52' 4g. 54' G/. 74 5 59 °03'ZG "E Z /Q3° /`~• r ZZ" 40.00' 8 Ste' - ----- - --4.2q' 3 t 43° l.q.' 22' ¢O Do / 74 8.54-' ~ 5 f 4° 40' - 2. - - . . . . 0.87 /. 74. '7/ 4o'S9'E ~~.~~„- ~R W EX ~O R p PHASE: Y EX H 1131T A SHOW 1 NG O•~4 ~.GRE REYER'TING To LOT ( 0.002 AGRE REVERTiN6 To l_.oT2,o kllrtii7°,~ptZ {.{ I l.Lg MaGi9?ERILl.I. Di5T1ZIGT RGa-tJ0lCE GOU t~'f `1~ VIRGINIA JUNE S, 1944 -~ D~ NUMBER q ~ Iqq • PLANNERS •ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 772-9580 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ! ~ ~!/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate a 0.004 acre and a 0.002 acre portion of a dedicated right-of-way as recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, situated in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• Staff is recommending that the portion of right-of-way identified on the attached map be vacated. The additional right- of-way is not required for VDOT acceptance. BACKGROUND: The petitioner, Mr. Ron Jackson the developer, is requesting the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to vacate 4.90 feet of a 54.90 foot wide right-of-way. The vacation consist of two strips of right-of-way approximately 2.45 feet in width shown as cross- hatching on Exhibit "A" (refer to attached map). The petitioner needs to obtain these two strips in order that he may construct retaining walls outside the 50 foot right-of-way. Once the parcels are created the petitioner plans to combine both parcel with the adjoining lots (lot 1 and lot 20) in Phase 1, Wexford Subdivision. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Engineering and Inspections Department have been notified by the Virginia Department of Transportation that they have no objections to the vacation as long as a 50 foot right- of-way is maintained. .,.~ Roanoke County is requesting that the referenced right-of-way as shown on the attached map be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached ordinance. The Department of Engineering & Inspections has no objections to the proposed vacation on the following conditions: 1. A 50 foot right-of-way is maintained. 2. That 0.004 acre and 0.002 acre parcels are combined with the adjoining lots. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; second reading and public hearing are scheduled for July 26, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors vacate the referenced right-of-way and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance and incorporate the above mentioned conditions. MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: rno d Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe tions County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 • 565575 ~~ ~ Q ~J 3 W ~ c2 ~ ~ 0.00¢4C. To ~PEVERT To ~ llo ~ V G o7 / 2 ~ m Ci 0 N y. J~\ N } Q O O, 054AC. ~N ~ W REM,4/N/NG /N R/W 2N ~ ~~~ ~ N 0 m ~ h o a ~ ~ j So,~, „w 2.4~' ~ raTAC ~4:~0' LOT WEXFORD N 85°O/"3o"W 2.4~' PEfASE I P.B. / (o PG. /22 C3 o. cb2 dC. To REVERT N 7a LOT Zd GoR DON S jOBB EC~A.4 R N ~ D.B. /307 PG ~ 35 T M. S(o. O/-2 -/7 p N PORT/ON OF R/W TO REVERT ?O v LOTS l A ND ZO OF GVEXFORD h PHASEI P.B./L PG. /22 AS RECORDED ~ IN D.B. /44l PG.G544,UD6~7 DATE MaY lo, 1944. C.O-[ 20 \ WEXFORD PHASE I P.8/~/~122 ON .~~ ~\~ Q ~. ~g r ~«~+ ~'URVF Td R/ G ~ CURVE DE L7q ~ RQ DI US ARC TANGENT CHDRO BEARING I /O/° O/' OZ" qd pp 70.52' 48.54' l0% 7¢ 5,59 °03'ZG "E ' Z /~-3°/4'~ " ° ' " 40.00' S .~' - ------~ - 4.2q' - 8.54-' ' S (4,° 4d' - .2• 3 t 43 (q- 22 40.00 / .7¢ 0.87 /. 74. '7/ 40'S9'E ~~.18~~ ~R EX H I SIT ~ W EX >=0 R p PHASc I SHOW 1 NG O.Gk74 OGRE REYER'TtNG To LOT I 0.002 AG RE RJ= VER?1 AJc, Tp 1,.pT2o R /l T .~/ j~ k11A1D~pR H i ~„Lg Md-G19?ER1QL DlS7RiGT JJl 11.~ 1J Ro~.NOKE COUN'N, VIRGlN1A ~ ~ SOGiATEa~c JUNE S, 1944- ~. -~o~ NUMBER 9~igq •PLANNERS•ARCHITECTS•ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS• 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 772-9580 REFLECT~Np TOMORROW 3 r~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 ORDINANCE VACATING A 0.004-ACRE AND A 0.002-ACRE PORTION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN PHASE 1 OF WEXFORD SUBDIVISION (PB 16, PAGE 122), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ron Jackson has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate 4.90 feet of a 54.90-foot wide right-of-way located off Homewood Circle in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 16, at page 122 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 4.90 feet of a 54.90-foot wide right-of-way located off Homewood Circle in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 16, at page 122, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1- 482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: (a) A 50-foot right-of-way be retained. 7-~ (b) That the vacated 0.004-acre parcel be added into and combined with Lot 1 in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision and the 0.002-acre parcel be added into and combined with Lot 20 in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, by recordation of a plat or plats approved by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. (c) That 0.004-acre and 0.002-acre parcels be combined with the adjoining lots; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Ron Jackson shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by him, his heirs, successors, or assigns. 5. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. vacationlw'exfordsub ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM:1 Work Session to give consideration for Roanoke County to provide maintenance to Residential Stormwater Facilities. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : Our review of what is being done in other localities shows that most are limiting their involvement to testing rather than ownership and maintenance of detention facilities. The schedule for implementation of the Clear Water Act has been changed and we do not know when it will be put into effect. I prefer to consider this work session an informational discussion and wait until we have more information on what is required. If you wish to proceed instead, we will need some way to assess those properties that benefit from detention facilities with the cost of maintaining them. This will not be easy because there are already twenty such facilities in the County for which we could impose a maintenance fee. It may be possible to allow the communities an option of maintaining it for themselves and paying us a fee each year for testing that will be required. For those communities that wish to have the County assume full responsibility, perhaps we could agree upon a fee to cover the cost. Because of the liability involved and the cost involved, this needs to be studied further. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Purpose of the work session is to provide information to Board of Supervisors on issues that should be considered if the Board elects to establish a maintenance program. Attached for your review is our report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Board elects to adopt a new maintenance program and provide this new service, County staff will bring back a formal maintenance policy, fiscal impact statement and ordinance for final adoption. S ITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Dire for of Engineering & Inspections Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED BY: 5~~-"' Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens i ~~ `\ ~ MAINTENANCE OF DETENTION PONDS BY ROANOKE COUNTY OUTLINE I. HISTORY II. CLEAN WATER ACT III. REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN IV. COMPARISON TO OTHER LOCALITIES V. LIABILITY VI. FUNDING VII. CONCLUSION /t1i ~ n~ I. HISTORY The first detention ponds appeared in Roanoke County in the mid- seventies as a requirement for soil erosion and sediment control. The ponds were designed strictly for this purpose and were usually temporary in nature. With the advent of the 1985 flood and increasing awareness of stormwater quantity, detention ponds were seen as tools to not only mitigate soil erosion and sediment control, but also as a means to reduce the impacts of downstream flooding as well. In January of 1990, Roanoke County adopted stormwater management criteria which required every new development in the County to address the issue of stormwater management. As a result, more detention ponds are being constructed in Roanoke County. According to our records (residential facilities only), prior to 1990 there were only approximately 8 ponds constructed. After January 1990 there has been approximately 17 ponds constructed with new ponds coming into operation monthly. A part of the construction of a stormwater facility is the establishment of a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement between Roanoke County and the owner. The owner in executing the agreement assumes responsibility for the maintenance of the facility. In most all cases in Roanoke County, the developer/owner transfers this maintenance responsibility on to a homeowners association. Because of concern or lack in a few cases of maintenance by a homeowners association, Roanoke County staff and members of the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association formed a technical subcommittee in 1991 to establish a procedure for requesting the County of Roanoke to accept the responsibility for maintenance of above ground stormwater facilities located within single family subdivisions. The reluctance on behalf of County staff to endorse this document has stemmed from impending federal regulations as a result of the Clean Water Act. 2 V-I II. CLEAN WATER ACT According to the Environmental Protection Agency, "runoff from stormwater and other nonpoint sources is the largest remaining, virtually unaddressed source of water pollution." The control of stormwater runoff is an enormous undertaking that will challenge U.S. industrial facilities and municipalities to develop new pollution prevention strategies. Before the 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program regulated only point source discharges of pollutants into streams, lakes and bays. The 1987 amendments added Section 402 (p) for regulating stormwater discharges under the NPDES program because a national water quality inventory conducted by EPA indicated severe stormwater runoff pollution problems. Applications for NPDES stormwater discharge permits are required to be filed in two parts for municipal and industrial facilities. Part 1- must include an inventory of all stormwater outfalls and drainage points. This could be one of the most labor intensive activities of the permitting program. One of the major goals of EPA's regulation is to eliminate illegal stormwater outfalls to municipal systems. Part 2- the permit applications for municipalities must include plans for comprehensive stormwater management, water quality monitoring, and elimination of illegal outfalls into stormwater systems. Part 1 of the application for populations of less than 100,000 was October 1, 1992. County staff has been informed by the Virginia Water Control Board (VWCB) that this date has been moved back indefinitely. 3 ~i III. REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN In 1985, the Fifth Planning District Commission sponsored a study for Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem and the Town of Vinton to determine the feasibility of implementing a regional stormwater management program. Due to the proposed high cost of studying all of the tributaries in the region, it was decided that the localities should concentrate on sixteen "high priority" watersheds that were deemed critical. These are as follows: 1. Glade Creek 9. Ore Branch 2. Cole Hollow Brook 10. Murray Run 3. Mason Creek 11. Mudlick Creek 4. Tinker Creek 12. Dry Branch 5. Peters Creek 13. Gish Branch 6. Carvin Creek 14. Butt Hollow Creek 7. Lick Run 15. Barnhardt Creek 8. Back Creek 16. Wolf Creek The total cost of developing a Regional Stormwater Management Master Plan is $690,000. Roanoke County's share is estimated to be $300,000. A comprehensive stormwater management program involves developing a watershed "master plan," which identifies the most appropriate control measures and optimum locations to control watershed-wide impacts. This approach typically involves combinations of the following (a) strategically locating a single stormwater detention facility (as opposed to several smaller detention ponds); (b) providing stream channel improvements where necessary; and (c) nonstructural measures such as parkland acquisition and floodproofing to supplement structural control measures. The master plan approach offers significant advantages over the piecemeal approach, including: reductions in capital and in operating and maintenance costs; reductions in the risk of downstream flooding and erosion; opportunities to manage existing stormwater problems; increases in land development opportunities; increased opportunities for recreational uses of facilities; potential contributions from land and real estate development; and conformity with land use planning issues. 4 `~ f IV. COMPARISON TO OTHER LOCALITIES Stormwater Pond Maintenance County staff have contacted seven counties to discuss their policy for maintenance of detention ponds. The following counties were contacted: (1) Albemarle, (2) Chesterfield, (3) Henrico, (4) James City (5) Loudoun, (6) Spotsylvania and (7) Prince William. It was found in all seven counties that homeowner associations are required for the mowing and general maintenance of all the ponds. The only county except Fairfax (not contacted) which is involved to a limited degree with the maintenance of ponds is Prince William County. The Chief of Watershed Management for Prince William County informed County staff that their only maintenance responsibility is the proper operation of the ponds. This involves but is not limited to: debris removal, tree removal, unclogging pipes and sediment removal in the basins. Mowing of the ponds themselves are the responsibility of the various homeowners associations. Prince William County's funding source is a newly adopted Stormwater Utility FEE which is currently assessed against all developed properties in the County. Prince William County, as of July 1, 1994, inspects and provides limited maintenance to approximately 350 ponds located in residential and commercial areas. The County's current maintenance budget for drainage easements and pond maintenance is approximately $600,000 per year. 5 Y V. LIABILITY - To be discussed by the County Attorney. 4t~ w VI. FUNDING The following funding alternatives are available to pay for the management and regulation of stormwater: 1. Increase the real estate tax levy - This alternative provides the broadest scope and coverage as well as the largest potential for revenue. It is "fair" in its impact, if one assumes that the greater value in the real estate assessment is for improvements, and improvements directly contribute to stormwater runoff. The existing cost shifting attributes to protect the elderly, the handicapped, and land use participants (the farmers?) are already in place. 2. Section 2.04 of the Roanoke County Charter authorizes the creation of "special districts," which are areas desiring additional or more complete governmental services than are desired in the County as a whole. The Board shall have the power to levy a higher tax in such area and the proceeds shall be segregated for those additional services. The creation of the special district must be approved by the voters residing within the proposed special district at a referendum. 3. Title 21 of the State Code provides for the creation of special purpose districts to address certain aspects of the stormwater management problem. Sanitary districts, sanitation districts, and drainage projects are different approaches authorized by state law. Generally, each of these districts or projects are created by judicial action after petition is submitted to the circuit court, a hearing is held, and certain judicial findings made with respect to the creation of such a district. Once these judicial proceedings are completed, a tax may be levied on all property in the district to pay the expenses and charges for constructing, maintaining and operating these facilities. Bonds may be issued to construct authorized facilities. 4. Section 15.1-239 authorizes the County to impose a special assessment upon abutting property owners for a variety of public improvements including stormwater sewers (other improvements are: construction, replacement or enlargement of sidewalks, waterlines, sanitary or stormwater sewers, street lights, retaining walls, curb and gutters, canopies or other weather protective devices, benches or waste receptacles). This assessment is limited to the "peculiar benefits" resulting from the improvements to the abutting property owner. 5. Stormwater utility - The 1991 sessions of the Virginia General Assembly authorized localities to adopt a stormwater control program by establishing a utility or enacting a system of service charges to recover costs associated with planning, design, land acquisition, construction operation and maintenance activities (see Section 15.1-292.4 of the State 7 VI. FUNDING (continued) V `~( Code). These charges are assessed to property owners or occupants, and are based upon contributions to stormwater runoff. The locality is authorized to issue general obligation or revenue bonds to finance the cost of infrastructure and equipment for this stormwater control program, including structural and natural stormwater control systems (e.g. detention/retention basins, sewers, conduits, pipelines, pumping and ventilating stations, and other plants, structures, and real and personal property used for support of the system). Finally, any two or more localities may enter into cooperative agreements concerning the management of stormwater. Finally, unpaid charges and interest shall constitute a lien against the property ranking on a parity with liens for unpaid taxes. v-i VII. CONCLUSION Based on our research, County staff found only two localities involved in the limited maintenance of stormwater facilities. If it is the direction of the Board of Supervisors to move forward with some type of maintenance program, staff requests that the following be given consideration: 1. Regional Master Plan be developed and approved. 2. Funding mechanism should be established to incur expenses for maintenance and liabilities. This funding mechanism should be flexible to address impending Federal and State mandates. 3. Amend Roanoke County's Design and Construction Standards for stormwater Facilities to coincide with the Master Plan recommendations. 4. Homeowner associations remain responsible for the ownership and liability of the properties on which their stormwater facilities are built. 5. Roanoke County be involved with only the limited maintenance of the facilities not the aesthetics/landscaping (mowing). 9 TABLE 8-3 SAMPLE STORMWATER UTILITIES IN SOUTHEASTERN U.S. . No. of Years to Starting Flat Rate Enterprise Billing Jurisdiction Year ($/month/ERU) Fund System Tallahassee, FL 1986 Yr 1: $1.00 5 Electric Yr 2: $1.60 Daytona Beach, FL 1988 $1.00 1 Water/Sewer Miami, FL 1988 X2.50 4 WaterlSewer Port St. Lucie, FL 1988 X3.00 0 Private Ocala, FL 1988 X2.00 2 Electric Oakland Park, FL 1988 $1.00 2 WaterlSewer Sarasota County, FL (1990) $2.00 3 Property Tax Hillsborough County, FL (1990) X3.00 3 Property Tax Manatee County, FL (1990) $1.00-$2.00 5 Water/Sewer Tampa, FL (1984 Study) - X2.60 5 .Utility approved .: --~ and scheduled for start-up 8-20 i~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 72694-13 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE• Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session O~ ROANp~~ L ti ~ 2 17 z J .ate 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~oixx~t~ ~~ ~.o~xx~o~~E P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 July 28, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (703) 772-2005 Mrs. James A. (Chris) Pickard 5460 Stonebrook Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ids . Pi~'ka rd • c._-~ r~J The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service as an alternate member of the Community Corrections Resources Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a regular member of the Board for a one-year term. Your new term will expire on August 31, 1995. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sinc rely, ~3 Lee B. Eddy, Chai n Roanoke County Board LBE/bj h - Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Phipps, VASAP of Supervisors ®Recyded Paper LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roger & Barbara Hale for a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1994 ~ c~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Ti~~+es +,~ h~orld-News Tuesday, July 12, 1994 Tuesday, July 19, 1994 To be paid on delivery by: Roger & Barbara Hale 4264 Spicewood Lane Salem, VA 24153 (703) 380-3101 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill for a Special Use Permit to construct a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1994 ~J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 12, 1994 Tuesday, July 19, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: D. Jeffry Parkhill Hughes Associates Architects PO Box 1034 Roanoke, VA 24005 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE~ VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Department of Economic Development to rezone 2.76 acres from R-1 to I-1 to construct a warehouse distribution facility located on Hollins Road between Tinkerbell Lane and Lois Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1994 ~ ~~:-~-~~c.~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 12, 1994 Tuesday, July 19, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Economic Development Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2069 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Mona S. Sutphin for a Special Use Permit to construct a private horse stable located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: July 8, 1994 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, July 12, 1994 Tuesday, July 19, 1994 To be paid on delivery by: Mona Sutphin 1935 Langdon Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24015 (703) 345-1171 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Vaughn Incorporated, requesting to vacate surplus right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive as recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request maybe examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this July 7, 1994. .~ G2.e,e~~/ Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: July 12, 1994 July 19, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Lumsden & Associates P. O. Box 20669 4664 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, July 26, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Ron Jackson, requesting to vacate a 0.004 acre and a 0.002 acre portion of a dedicated right-of- way as recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, situated in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request maybe examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this July 7, 1994. ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: July 12, 1994 July 19, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Balzer & Associates 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 ~~ ~~- 7/18/94 Roger from Glenvar High School They want to come to Board Meeting July 26th, for recognition, and he is bringing three coaches whose teams won state championships 1. Larry Wood, Baseba~Cll 2. Art Lawrence, Tennis 3. Bo Hagen, Golf Also they will bring one or two representatives from teams with them. Asked him to let us know names so we can have certificate or something. Glenvar won 9 Pioneer district championships olf and girls 4 Region C championships (Baseball, Tennis, g softball) Came in 3rd in Softball 3 State Championships Central Fidelity gives cups each year to schools with top points for three categories - Glenvar received points for state titles, etc. and received the cup for overall athletics. He will bring the cup to the meeting. Roger will get additional information - specific information about Central Fidelity award - and call me tomorrow. Asked him to fax it so Anne Marie can write resolutions. Brenda 7/ 6/94 Roger Martin, Assistant Principal High School, 387-6536, called and the award from Central Fidelity. July 26 meeting. Told him that we would need would be present by July 18 award from Central Fidelity. Titlebaum from RT&WN to try recognition from the Board. and Athletic Director, Glenvar said that they have not received They would prefer to wait until information for resolution and who or 19th. Also suggested they bring Mr. Martin said he would call Mr. to get someone in paper about the Brenda 6/20/94 Mary Allen Gary Harth, 265-0600, work, calling from Glenvar Sports Foundation, said that Glenvar High School is being recognized as top school in Virginia for overall athletics by Central Fidelity Bank. I did not get all the exact titles but they had championships in three sports - at least one at state level. He was not sure when the award was being made but wanted this recognized by the Board. I gave him June 28, July 26 and August 23 at 7 p.m. as dates for Board recognition. He is going to get back in touch with us by fax with information for resolution and when will be coming to Board Meeting. Told him if he wanted to do this June 28, had to have information to us by Wednesday. He will call back. Brenda ~C ~- ED KOHINKE 6913 Bradshaw Road ~~ ~ ~ Salem, Virginia 24153 _ (703) 384-8013 (FAX OR VOCE) July 13, 1994 To: Lee Eddy, Chairman Subject: Media RE: My memo on this subject 6/30/94 In my memo, I suggested two approaches to a "media call" for our meetings. One approach: to allow ten or fifteen minutes (essentially a "recess") between the afternoon meeting and the executive session to allow individual supervisors to talk with the media without feeling rushed to get to the executive session on time. The other approach: to do this collectively, i.e., simply ask the media if they have any questions for us before we adjourn. Having given it much thought, I would prefer the first approach because this is almost what takes place already: the only thing different would be for you to formally declare a ten or fifteen minute recess. If we use the second approach, we may still end up talking individually with reporters afterwards, and it would use even more time which could have been used more productively with something else. EGK/bj h cc: Members, Board of Supervisors Elmer Hodge Mary Allen Anne Marie Green FAX TO: Ed Kohinke FROM: Mary Allen RE: Highway and Transportation Safety Commission The fault lies with me regarding a report for the above commission. I was working on it, laid it aside, and never got back to it...sorry. I have done some research on when the committee was established, why it was established, etc. It was established in 1984 by resolution would have to be deleted by resolution also. The state has a Board of Transportation Safety under the DMV. I was going to contact them and find out if other local governments have similar commissions....that is where I left off. I will follow up, and will contact members of the Roanoke County Highway and Transportation Safety Commission to see if they are still active, and will prepare a report for the July 26 agenda. Again, sorry I didn~t follow up. Mary Allen 7/13/94 CC: ECH LBE 13 ~~ by ~"ron lc, ~ • ~/e, ,Sp r, ~.~sc~rC d'l~~ /~ MEMORANDUM TO: Arnold Covey FROM: Mary Allen m DATE: June 16. 1994 SUBJECT: Stormwater Detention Policy Work Session July 26, 1994 Elmer wanted me to remind you to be sure and invite anyone who could be affected by a new stormwater detention policy, including Homeowners Associations. 1 wouldn't invite them until the week before the July 26 meeting, because as you know, these work sessions sometimes get postponed or moved to another date. MEMORANDUM TO: Lee Eddy Ed Kohinke Bob Johnson Fuzzy Minnix Harry Nickens FROM: John Cease, Chief of Police DATE: July 21, 1994 SUBJECT: REPORT ON ANTI CRIME BILL ~~~ By memo of 7/18/94, Mr. Kohinke asked what was planned for the "over $200,000" that Roanoke County was going to receive from the anti crime bill as stated in the attached article in the July 15th VACo newsletter. I contacted VACo and was told by the author of the article that the information was very misleading, his phone was ringing off the hook, and he apologized for the confusion. There is NO money involved The article stated that the "House Operations Committee" approved funding for the anti crime bill; however, for the fundina to become a reality, the Senate must pass a similar bill and the full Congress would have to endorse one bill or the other. The bill then must be signed by the President. The anti crime bill has been around through two Presidents and Congress and there has been lots of talk, lots of articles and lots of crime, but no action in the last six years. JHC/BJH Attachment cc: Elmer Hodge Paul Mahoney Anti-crime bill to provide $2 billion for prevention programs in In~ar+~o~ he anti-crime bill passed by the U.S. House of Represen- tatives authorizes $2 billion indirect formula payments to counties and cities for education, jobs and substance abuse programs to prevent crime. The title is called the Local Partnership Act, and it is based on legislation approved by the House Government Operations Committee in 1992. The Local Partnership Act is similar to the general revenue sharing pro- ~ram but is more targeted to juris- dictions with high unemployment and low per capita income. Pay- ments to jurisdictions with per capita income higher than 120 per- cent of the state average would get reduced payments. No payments would be made to jurisdictions with more than 160 percent of the state average. The formula particu- larly benefits low income rural counties and poorer central cities. Conversely, many wealthier subur- ban cities and counties have their payments reduced because of high per capita income relative to the state average. Cities and towns receiving less than X5,000 would not get direct fund- ing. The state would receive their allocation and would distribute the funds to needy areas in the state for crime prevention programs. The number of eligible recipient juris- dictions is cut byhalf -from 39,000 to 20,000 cities and counties - by this provision. No counties are af- fected by this cutoff. The charts on pages 7-11 show the estimated allocations in Virginia to counties, towns and cities. The amounts shown will change slightly but are in the ballpark. Counties and the towns they con- tain are listed,first, followed by cit- ies. Soicrce: Nationnl Assocurtion of Coun- ties, Jtcne 13,1994 Amount direct to Amount to goy- Amount Amount AccomackCounty locality $272 471 ernor direct to locality to gov- ernor Town of Accomac , 0 $0 503 Town of Pamplin $0 $1,041 Town of Belle Haven 0 Town of Bloxom 0 208 Arlington County 0 0 Town of Chincoteague 7 288 g07 0 Town of Keller Town of Melfa 0 3,618 Augusta County Town of Craigsville 345 315 ~ 0 0 Town of Onancock p 0 360 1,870 Town of Onley 0 2507 Bath County 148 798 0 Town of Painter 0 848 Town of Parksley 0 371 2 486 Bedford County 96,583 0 Town of Tangier 0 , Town of Wachapreague 0 -- --1.290 Bland County 43,124 0 Town of Hallwood 0 281 Town of Saxis 0 529 Botetourt County 121,208 0 478 Town of Buchanan 0 ~_ 3 446 Albemarie County 154,851 0 Town of Fincastle 0 , 146 Town of Scottsville 0 Town of Troutville 0 547 1,655 AlleghanyCounty 184 ~ ~ 0 Brunswick County 121,111 _, _ p Town of Iron Gate 0 1 624 Town of Alberta 0 _ 2,111 . _ , Town of Brodnax 0 2023 Amelia County _'- 64 694 Town of Lawrenceville 14,431 0 - , - --- -- 0 Amherst County 179 704 0 Buchanan County 321,112 _ 0 Town of Amherst 0 Town of Grundy 6,872 0 4.246 Appomattox County 81 425 Buckingham County 142,882 0 Town of Appomattox , 9118 0 0 Town of Dillwyn 0 1,962 continued on page e Anti-crime bill to provide funds Amount Amount direct to to gov- Town of Occoquan locaiity $0 ernor Town of Quantico $0 4006 Town of Dumfries 7,692 _ 0 Pulaski County 268,595 0 Town of Dublin 13,837 0 Town of Pulaski 81,352 0 Rappahannock County 14,178 0 Town of Washington 0 212 Richmond County 66,221 p Town of Warsaw 0 3,034 Roanoke County 221,834 Town of Vinton 40,100 RockbridreCounty 164,017 0 Town of GIasgow 7,822 0 Town of Goshen 0 899 Rockinbham County 216,836 0 Town of Bridgewater 11,745 0 Town of Broadway 0 _ _ 3 533 Town of Dayton 0 ,_,_ , 2 628 Town of Elkton 0 , 4 854 Town of Grottoes 0 , 4 237 Town of Mount Crawford 0 __ , 1 537 Town of Timberville 5,772 _, , 0 Russell County 339,301 0 Town of Cleveland 0 531 Town of Honaker 6,548 0 Town of Lebanon 14,965 0 Scott County 159,370 0 Town of Clinchport 0 128 Town of Dungannon 0 _ 1 335 Town of Gate City 5,895 _ , 0 Town of Nickelsville 0 185 Town of Weber City 14,490 0 Town of Duffield 0 0 Shenandoah County 131,140 0 Town of Edinburg 0 3 010 Town of Mount Jackson 6 731 , p Town of New Market 6,988 0 Town of Strasburg ' 18,719 0 Townof TornsBrook 0 210 Town of Woodstock 11,524 0 Amount Amount direct to to gov- SmythCounty_ locality _ $221,641 ernor .0 Town of Chilhowie 7,709 0 Town of Marion 44,659 p Town of Saltville 9,914 p Southampton County 125,036 0 Town of Boykins 0 2 715 ~ Town of Branchville 0 21I Town of Capron 0 5% Town of Courtland 0 2,247 Town of Ivor 0 521 Town of Newsoms 0 749 Spotsylvania County 214,808 Stafford County 182,811 0 SurryCounty 102,736 0 Town of Claremont 0 702 Town of Dendron 0 548 Town of Surry 0 269 Sussex County 117,415 0 Town of Stony Creek 0 1,110 Town of Wakefield 0 3,387 Town of Waverly 11,733 0 Tazewell County 201,733 p Town of Bluefield 13,(,5 0 Town of Cedar Bluff 0 2,107 Town of Pocahontas 0 1,574 Town of Richlands 25,406 0 Town of Tazewell 18,450 0 Warren County 92,715 0 Town of Front Royal 54,027 __ 0 Washington County 256,995 0 Town of Abingdon 18,712 0 Town of Damascus 7,786 0 Town of Glade Spring 5,724 __ 0 Westmoreland County 81,910 p Town of Colonial Beach 11,792 0 Town of Montross 0 570 W'se County 501,415 _ 0 Town of Appalachia _ 17,846 _ 0 Town of Big Stone Gap 41,255 0 Town of Coeburn 17,021 0 Town of Pound 8,374 0 continued on page 11 _ _ I~O ROAN~KG ~~ ?©;,G101~~ S ©~19g~ Zg. ©J OLSC~+ ~'~~ ~~ ,2 0~~, Cp~~Y C~~~ R0~ 1~ ~.~g ~ ~~s~~°°'~~ ~o~ ~ $u4 ~~,~.~,~e.. o~~' sY ` so : ~ eri~'° ~ZEY d~n9• 4Y s tre . 3 . C~S~ ~ 4e~®st yr~~tY ~'~~~° jpi11~ ~ bi11 rep FMK • . p1 110 ! 9~ i11 ~te4i°~t e~tiaLe ~~pt ~,~ c asks s i o~et b! 11 tr'r D*Tg• t~ Ct~®~ ~49~'Qjra ot~to; ~ ~ °~® o~ b~.ll esn~ olg. ~; ~px- es V*~~ srti Lurat~ SsrQ 4r~'o~o~ifs 8 gtst a anti isod ~` eor~Y • n a44~ sy~od tin0 ~ ~y is ~~ th0 vr~,te c woo a ~0 ~0~,09 ~a mitt to »saowov~la ha44 ~~a®rt VA~p w~ oK ~-r ~9or~t C°~' erg r egs 1SY gte c~ the ~ v'c~-i aor~r~,t ~ Y trg tie '~~r9'~r~3 °~s et~,vs asi~ r, L~i~a11Y ,s~q'~ W ~,tr ~ as r eeont • es~ge ~yrt ~'° iete~de pray t,~ale• CO ~e'P ~oreY tyo Q~g~,g y Qke fret r eir9 °`'~ e~1• va a tre trro,~~ ~ Lss~~ar, ~s s ne ~~s1ea i~ ~o ~pod~r, t s'P ovrd ~, `~ to a tr ro sa tos , ~re~ ~~,~ ~,rd ®~r errs4'~~o4 crime ge'~°eto~ p~ae p~11 r n~ ~ rs®~ 1°ts told Y ti °=i~esrds of eYt~al o re °'~ r9'~ ee 1°t arty v= tslx, ~~~" ~ ~, ~~ l~~i~ ''~ ''~ ~ ~~ d~ , ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~~ / By Fax - pages 7/19/94 To: Chief John Cease From: Brenda Holton At Agenda Meeting this morning, Mr. Hodge asked me to have you respond to E Kohinke's request for a preliminary report at the July 26th board meeting concerning the article on Anti-Crime Bill in VACo Newsletter 7/15/94. Attached is a copy of Ed's memo as well as copy of the article from VACo newsletter. (I only copied the first page and the page relating to the amount due Roanoke County.) Would you put your answer in Board Report format, title could be "Report on Receipts from Anti-Crime Bill" or something similar. Thanks for your help. CC: Attachments ~ ~' ~~ E~ ~0~1~ R~aa Btads~ ~ 2453 Sad ~ V itQ~°~a 3$~"$p13 <~p3~ vo~~E~ 1F PX pR 994 1a ' 1 ~,i1`I aV e d liK t z e~la~ w°vl reX 94 a~ Z ~ °°~ use adY e ~ / 15 / ,le to ~ a ca 5 Z° ~ L lie ~°d~S ew5letteY '°nis na 5 zepoY e~eY,~ WW 11 tnl E C° Z1 5 it 111 e~~l noW ect' VA tw° lst a re ti~eest °rs ~ its e Bll, S~~ e a~eat lea le „geo ~eadse55 ~1,C~i~ ~e~er 2ne~ yp tic tW a An ~~ to '~ dd~esseee,°it~~3 : L ~ the at lve t° d° t°• le °r X200 i ppo ~°aYd m ,~ Pa~e~ai.se5 we ba a~t1c °ver 1 •~ardate~at ~y~rt a~Se '1 ~ 11 re ~ t° Used a~, 7 Y ~] 1 pia /a~ fect ~5 . ta~~lrg e c°U~t~O ~~.~ t S °a,~oK late ate tr ~°w d° w e p t, ~~. ~~lme n eadirg File gGK/~ Board fan°re`I cc : 4aul pller ~a~ .. ~ ~. ve ii ~ ev t~a,~ ~v ~~ v v ~~~.; ~~ i.~I111~J3 i ~a r ~ prev~nt~an ra rams ~ ~ a ~r~ lacaftt~es r~° • i~ ~`~ ~a ~^$~ . ` ~~ 6 ha ~er+ti~rirne bill passed by R}~e U.S, House of ReprGSen- kattvesauthorizes SZ btlAon in direct fortnuia payments Io cotutties artd cities for educAtion, jutrs and subsetu+ce abuse prvgrama to prevent crime. The title is c~lied the tomcat t'artrlership Act, ttnd it is boned oa legi3lation apprtn-ed by the Hou1w Government Qper„tions Committee in 1992. The local pattrwrahip Act is similar +o the general rrve<1ue sharing prv- grambut is more targeted to juria- dlcttonswith high unemployment and low per cspim lrxome. Psy- mtstts to ~urisdictione with per capita income higher than 120 per- cent of the state average wouid get reduc~td payn~ena. Np payments would be made to jueiedictions with more tlthn 360 percent of the state ava~rege• "11'te formula particu• lady benefits lvw tncoma rural counties and poorer tenses i ci ties. Conveteely, mt-ny wealthier subur- ban cidt?a erlci counciel have their payments rtttiuced because of high par capita income rotative to the State avt'rage. Cities told towns receiving less ~M 55,000 wouid not get direct fund- ing. The scats would receive their allocat#on and would distribute the itttlds to needy antes in the serfs for Amount Amovnt d[nect to to gov. Amount Amount dlraet to to gev. tecatity arntx Town of pttmtsiin SO f1A41 Arlington Cnunty 0 0 Augusts COtlnty 345,315 Q Town of Crat~ville 0 _~ ,.,_ 1,$70 Bath County 148,798 0 Bedford County 96,583 0 Bland County 43,IZ4 0 l3ptetourt County ,_, r- 111,08 _~, 0 Tttwn of B~~chanan 0 3,46 Town of Flncaatle 0 1~ Teswn of Troutvillp 0 S~7 Beunswicic County 121,111 ~ 0 Town of Alberts Q , 2,111 Town of Brodnax p 2,p~ Town of trwrenceville 14,431 0 BuchaeunCaunty~, _ 321,112 p Town of Grundy 6,Bn 0 BucWnghamCpttnty 14Z,S~t Q Town of D[llwyn 0 1,9ta2 -~.~. 0 I cattUnued an a 0 lot;~ilty error AccomackCounty 1272,477 SO Town of Accorttr<c 0 503 Town of Belle Haven 0 7~ Town of 8loxom ~,_ p _ _ ~ Town of Chln¢otaagwt 7,283 0 Town of Keller 0 3,618 Town of Melfa 0 96p Town of Onentrock 0 --.. 2,507 . Town of C-nley 0 g,~g Town of Piilt~r 0 371 Town of Ptrksley 0 1,i~ Town of Tangier t? __ ,^ 1,290 rows of wttchspreague 0 till fawn of Hallwood 0 529 Town of Saxie 0 47t4 AlbemarkCounty SS4,a51 . 0 Town of Scotbville 0 ~__-_ l,bb5 ~ttieghv-YCotutty 134,TI7 p Town o! Iron Ga to 0 1.624 At'tulia County ~ 64.694 _ ~ Q Arrtlwrst County 174,ypq 0 Town of I-trh~eat p _ - ,mss AQportwttoxCotutty 81,4 p Town of ApporrW,aou 9115 MO ~ ~ crime prevention progrrzrr-s. The number of eligible recipient ~uris• dictions is cut by hell-from 39,()00 to 20,OOp cities and wtuttlea - by this provision, iVo counties ant ef• fected by this cutoff. The charts on pages 7-I1 show the aStImated alloet~ttoru i» Virginia to cauneles, towns slid cities. The amounts shpwn will change slightly bu::ra in the ballpArs. Counties and the towns they con• tale are Isted,flr~t, followea by Cit• irs, Sortrcc; NationAl ~lssixurt'ion ojCaktn- ++es, frrne J3, I994 MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Mary Allen DATE: July 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Medical Appointment At the Fire and Rescue Chiefs Board meeting on July 13, the Board recommended the appointment of Bobby Fronk, chief of the Cave Spring Rescue Squad. Several meetings ago, Supervisor Kohinke asked that staff investigate the background and need for the above commission and report back to the Board. The Commission was established by Resolution No. 84-37 when the state abolished the Highway Transportation Safety Commission. Attached is a copy of the minutes and resolution which describes the duties of the commission. The Board of Transportation Safety was later established under the Division of Motor Vehicles. The appropriate code section is attached. I contacted Art LaPrade, Police Department, who serves as an advisory member. He told me that the commission meets four times a year. One of these meetings is a banquet where they recognize with a police officer, a firefighter, a school bus driver, and a member of the rescue squad for outstanding safety. They also recognize a local individual or business. Appalachian Power and N&W have been recognized in the past. Captain LaPrade advised me that in the past year they were involved in several safety issues. One was aletter-writing campaign or "gentle" lobbying effort with our local legislators regarding proposed safety legislation. The other was improving site distances at intersections. if the Board wishes to abolish the Highway and Transportation Commission, the Resolution would have to be rescinded. CC: Elmer C. Hodge 2-14-84 n ~ 6 The Highway Transportation Safety Commission was abolished by the State legislature and needs to be officially recreated in order to allow Roanoke County tc proceed with processing requests for grant approvals. Supervisor Minter moved the following prepared resolution requesting a list of members at the March 13 meeting so that they can be considered for reappointment and determination can be made regarding those citizens currently serving on this Commission. RESOLUTION N0. 84-37 ESTABLISHING THE I: ROANOKE COUNTY HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION ~' SAFETY COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR THE MEMBERSHIP ON SAID COMMISSION WHEREAS, by act of the General Assembly, §33.1-398 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, providing authority for ~. I I localities to establish Highway and Transportation Safety i Commissions, was repealed in 1981 and no substitute enabling I. I legislation was enacted to continue such authority in local governments; and ~ i~ j WHEREAS, the Board of Transportation Safety, a state agency ~iresponsible for processing applications for highway and II (transportation safety grants has refused to process such grants i'~ I unless same are approved by the local commission. r (~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ~~ h Ilof Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: i 1. That there be, and hereby is, established from and ~~ ~. !after April 1, 1984, and until further order of the Board, the .Roanoke County Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, - i i' j' liwhich commission shall have the duty and responsibility to (a) ,review, examine, and approve all highway safety grants and I'. i!recommend same to the Board of Supervisors for submission, (b) ii 'promote all highway and transportation safety programs, i.e. j ~I ;,highway, rail, water, and air safety, (c) make recommendations lithrough the Board of Supervisors to the Virginia Department of ~, (Highways and Transportation regarding signs, road improvements, I ~ i I ~ i~ d ~ 2-14-84 and engineering improvements, and (d) develop and establish '~ through the Board of Supervisors a safety program for the County i and sponsor an annual awards banquet for persons excelling in the ~i application of safety measures and procedures; and '~ j 2. That there shall be eleven (11) members of the " Commission who shall be residents of Roanoke County appointed by the Board of Supervisors on recommendation of the County jAdministrator. The members of the Commission shall serve for '~ terms of four (4) years, but no member shall serve for more than two (2) full successive terms. Initial appointments to the Commission shall be made as follows: two (2) shall be for terms of one (1) year, three (3) shall be for terms of two (2) years, ,I ;three (3) shall be for terms of three (3) years, and three (3) I'~ shall be for terms of four (4) years, and thereafter all (;(appointments shall be for terms of four years and the members of i ',the Commission shall annually elect its own chairman. The (members of the Commission shall be reimbursed for their necessary j land actual expenses incurred in the performance of their duties. 3. That there shall be such advisory members of the Commission as shall from time to time be determined appropriate I by the Board of Supervisors. Adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Minter, Brittle, Burton, Nickens (NAYS: None Mr. Flanders explained that the Animal Control Officers should be enrolled in law-enforcement training classes provided by the Cardinal Criminal Justice Academy. Supervisor Minter moved the following resolution approving authority to enter into an agreement with the Academy: RESOLUTION N0. 84-38 ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PROPOSAL FROM THE CARDINAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACADEMY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke IlCounty, Virginia, as follows: ~ w Mr. Eddy: RE: MEDICAL APPOINTMENT TO THE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION I talked with Tommy Fuqua as you suggested. He advised that the Rescue Chiefs Board meets on June 8. He will discuss with them at that time and ask for a volunteer to serve. He said if there is anyone interested, he will have the information by the June 14 meeting. The current term doesn't expire until June 30, so there will be time to wait for Chief Fuqua to discuss. Mary Allen 5/20/94 ~/~ ~~~ ~-t-~J ~ ~~ ~'~ v ~4 5 Q ~ a f~-f~ ~oa.,,~ o~ -T~-~-~,,-, S o,~~ , ~° ~-<o b § 46.2-223 nforcement officer, commis- ~ted with police powers and he enforcement of such laws _d duty. commissioner may adminis- ffidavits incidental to the X11 other laws relating to the driver's licenses, and the dine. They shall receive no ~g acknowledgments. (Code 0; 1989, c. 727; 1993, c. 533.) Department of Motor Vehicles" in ntence, and added the second and nces. Transportation Safety. of Commissioner. -The d duties related to transpor- ~e by all transport operators imonwealth, with particular pliances and methods and !ties aimed at enhancing the through the Commonwealth; >f the federal government, Transportation, the Federal Administration, the Coast :y Board in matters concern- es on matters pertaining to ~ctices, and procedures of the e Commonwealth and make tion, the Governor, and the ition safety consciousness or political subdivisions of the ensure safe transportation, ials and the rendering of ~luate, and review the data lent in regard to transporta- especially the information ~, the Department of State unction with relevant state ty safety program for the t lt; subdivisions of the Common- id review of local highway § 46.2-224 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES § 46.2-224 10. To review the activities, role, and contribution of various state entities to the Commonwealth's highway safety program and to report annually and in writing to the Governor and General Assembly on the status, progress, and prospects of highway safety in the Commonwealth; 11. To recommend to the Secretary of Transportation, the Governor, and the General Assembly any corrective measures, policies, procedures, plans, and programs which are needed to make the movement of passengers and property on the highways of the Commonwealth as safe as practicable; 12. To design, implement, administer, and review special programs or projects needed to promote highway safety in the Commonwealth; and 13. To integrate highway safety activities into the framework of transpor- tation safety in general. (1984, c. 778, § 46.1-40.4; 1989, c. 727; 1990, cc. 1, 317.) The 1990 amendments. - The 1990 amendment by c. 1, effective Feb. 22, 1990, and the 1990 amendment by c. 317, effective March 30, 1990, are identical, and substituted "Secre- tary of Transportation" for "Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety" in subdivi- sions 5 and 11. § 46.2-224. Board of Transportation Safety. -There is hereby estab- lished within the Department of Motor Vehicles a Board of Transportation Safety, hereinafter referred to in this section as "the Board," to advise the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Governor on transportation safety matters. The Board shall elect a chairman and meet at his call, and shall seek to identify the elements of a comprehen- sive safety program for all transport modes operating in Virginia. In addition, the Board may consider, study, and report on the following issues: (i) the identification of the unique safety needs of each particular mode of transpor- tation; (ii) the identification of the common elements of safe transportation .operation, regardless of mode of transportation; (iii) the adoption of proven safety practices and technology in use in one mode to other modes of transportation; (iv) the identification of the common elements of accident situations; and (v) the allocation of grant funds made available to the Department. The Board shall consist of eleven members appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation of the General Assembly. One member shall be appointed from each of the geographic operating districts used by the Department and shall reside in the district from which he is appointed. The remaining members shall be at-large members representing transportation safety interests in the areas of air, rail, water, motor carriers, pupil transportation, and public transit and, insofar as practical, should reflect fair and equitable statewide representation. Members shall serve for terms of four years, and no member shall serve for more than two full consecutive terms. Appointment and confirmation of Board members under this section shall occur only as the terms of the current members of the Board expire under prior law. Board members shall be reimbursed for their necessary and actual expenses `=incurred in the performance of their duties. (1984, c. 778, §§ 46.1-40.5, ..46.1-40.6; 1989, c. 727; 1990, cc. 1, 317; 1992, c. 95.) .. The 1990 amendments. - The 1990 amendment by c. 1, effective Feb. 22, 1990, and the 1990 amendment by c. 317, effective March 30, 1990, are identical, and substituted "Secre- tary of Transportation" for "Secretary of anaportation and Public Safety" in the first sentence of the first paragraph. `- ~:-. =' The 1892 amendment, in the second para- graph, deleted the former second and third sentences which read: "Seven members of the Board shall represent the seven geographic districts of the Commonwealth utilized by the Department of Motor Vehicles and designated by the Commissioner as operating districts. 79 46.2-223 MOTOR VEHICLES § 46.2-223 Nothing in this title shall relieve any law-enforcement officer, commis- sioner of the revenue, or any other official invested with police powers and duties, state or local, of the duty of assisting in the enforcement of such laws within the scope of his respective authority and duty. All law-enforcement officers appointed by the Commissioner may adminis- ter oaths and take acknowledgments and affidavits incidental to the administration and enforcement of 1 cations afor adriver's 1 licensesti and t e operation of motor vehicles, app ~ shall receive no collection and refunding of taxes levied on gasolinackno led ents. (Code compensation for administering oaths or taking ~ 1950, § 46-38; 1958, c. 541, § 46.1-37;1984, c. 780; 1989, c. 727;1993, c. 533.) The 1993 amendment, in the first pars- sion of the Department of Motor Vehicles" in graph, inserted "including those who are full- the first sentence, and added the second and time sworn members of the enforcement divi- third sentences. ARTICLE 2. Powers and Duties of Department Related to Transportation Safety. § 46.2-223. Additional powers and duties of Commissioner. -The Commissioner shall have the following powers and duties related to transpor- tation safety: 1. To evaluate safety measures currently in use by all transportpoperators in all modes which operate in or tl~ment andCapp lances land methodsl and attention to the safety of equip procedures of operation; 2. To engage in training and educational activities aimed at enhancing the safe transport of passengers and property in and through the Commonwealth; 3. To cooperate with all relevant entities of the federal g he Federal including, but not limited to, the Department of Transportation, Railway Administration, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Coast Guard, and the Independent Transportation Safety Board in matters concern- ing transportation safety; 4. To initiate, conduct, and issue special studies on matters pertaining to transportation safety; 5. To evaluate transportation safety efforts, practices, and procedures of the agencies or other entities of the government o ~ation~ t~heoGovernor,nand he recommendations to the Secretary of Transpo General Assembly on ways to increase transportation safety consciousness or improve safety practices; 6. To assist entities of state government and political subdivisions of the Commonwealth in enhancing their efforts to ensure safe transportation, including the dissemination of relevant materials and the rendering of technical or other advice; 7. To collect, tabulate, correlate, analyze, evaluate, and review the data gathered by various entities of the state government in regard to transporta- tion operations, management, and accidents, especially the information gathered by the Department of Motor Vehicles, the Department of State Police, and the State Corporation Commission; 8. To develop, implement, and review, in conjuncs~i~ withorea vm or tthe and federal entlties, a comprehensive highway y P ~ Commonwealth, and to inform the public about it; 9. To assist towns, counties and other political subdivisions of the Common- wealth in the development, implementation, and review of local highway safety programs as pan of the state program; 78 § 46.2-224 DEPARTI 10. To review the activities to the Commonwealth's high• in writing to the Governor an prospects of highway safety 11. To recommend to the c the General Assembly any and progrmns which are nef property on the highways o 12. To design, implement projects needed to promote 13. To integrate highway Cation safety in general. (19 317.) The 1990 amendments. - annendmeat by c. 1, effective Feb. 2: the 1990 ame a~tnca yand substit~. 30,1990, are §46.2-224. Board of Tr fished within the Depanm~ Safety, hereinafter referrec Commissioner of Motor Ve ~°a ~~t a ~~ lei, a a s -give safety program for all t the Board may consider, identification of the unique Cation; (ii) the identificatic operation, regardless of m• "safety practices and tech transportation; (iv) the id situations; and (v) the a Depp~utment. _,:,:~i'he Board shall consist Fxsubject to confirmation o ,~~ppointed from each of tDepartment and shall res: :-.-'remaining members shall ~sathty interests in the nation, and public ~y'Fequitable statewide rc "~yeara, and no member sh, ppointment and confirn :nr only as the terms c r rior law. -> Board members shall bf ~'carred in the perform a-40.6; 1989, c. 727; 1990 amendments. Invent by c. 1, effective Fe 90 amendment by c. 317, 90, are identical, and sub of Transportation" for portation and Public Saf noe of the first paragraF 7/19/94 Roger from Glenvar High School They want to come to Board Meeting July 26th, for recognition, and he is bringing three coaches whose teams won state championships 1. Larry Wood, Baseball 2. Art Lawrence, Tennis 3. Bo Hagen, Golf Also they will bring one or two representatives from teams with them. Asked him to let us know names so we can have certificate or something. Glenvar won 9 Pioneer district championships 4 Region C championships (Baseball, Tennis, golf and girls softball) Came in 3rd in Softball 3 State Championships Central Fidelity gives cups each year to schools with top points for three categories - Glenvar received points for state titles, etc. and received the cup for overall athletics. He will bring the cup to the meeting. ~~~-- ~-vr~.sz. ~l~h-Q tti. Q~e`. ~ LJ ~ Roger will get additional information - specific information about Central Fidelity award - and call me tomorrow. Asked him to fax it so Anne Marie can write resolutions . ~~ ~~ ~~x 3~ ~_ 6 ~ y ~ Brenda ` ~ - ~r 4 ~,..,. 071 19194 15 ~ 03 '~38?6148 GLENVAR H~ ~ ~~~ VIRGINIA HIGH ~CHQGL LEAGUE, INC. y~"^ ~, tfiri2 State Farm Blvd. • Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 ~-,~ ,`~~;r 1 R~4-977-8476 • R(14.977-5943 (FAX} '• ~~"~ KtNNtIH V. TILL1rY ~'xeourivc Diraotor PRQGRAIAS fiUPERV140R4 CLAL1dA L DOdSOfI Gr7a AfMBfres LARRYJDNNSON 8oyc Alhloil~oro~s ROBERT L BUTTpN Pubflcxrlon:s/rMemMti~n S6ry+cas Mr AI McGiearn, Principal Clt3nvar High $ChOdl 4649 Malrrs f)rive Saipm, VA 24153 Dr~ar AI: July 12, '1994 bn behalf of the Virginia High School Loaguc, we went to congratulate you, ycurtaculty, your slat( artr.i students on winning the flith annual Centraf FidelNy Cup Athletic Competition, Glsnvar can tako great pride upon being recognized as the Qroup A sclrlul wit(r llrr± fJeyl uverclll ~rformance In VHSL state-level athletic programs, Competitive team spats are regarded l,y tl-ra League a~ dr ~ inrl,x~rtant part of the general echo0l progr~nl, ~crving to produce well-rounded students who benefit (turn pariic.ipaliuri in dlFrietiGS t,~nducted In a wholesome, educational salting. Perhrip~ the cc~cnoc of this competition ie beat expressed lay parapi•n i~~ir iy a ter rtraf Fidelity drrreouncement related to thoir partncrphip with the League: your success in a broad range of VHSt_ a~¢tiruri4 activities "represents a commlt- rnorrt to cxacllcncc that is more than winning a single award. It i5 a fifa[iriie cunrnatrn+~nl (by yv<,r (acuity and SiUdentSj i0 bocome the best that they can be." ~nciosed is a press release which is Clair rg Sent to the rrledla to announce the winners and final atraetic startdirtgs. A gimilAr notice will be sent in 'League Nutes"later this surnrrter. we nave recelve~ the Lups ana wm torwaro your trophy to you wlthln the next Several Clays. We wvuW also 11ke to make a formal presentation of the cup t0 each WlMlftg school at VI-IvL t)ay in the fall (November 12) arrcl will send rrrore inforrnatlon ar)put the! event at a lacer date. If you rvoaid like to writti a lei.tar v( ~preciatfarr tv Central FItl81Ry, we suggest you 5enp R tD Mr. Carroll L. Saitle, CFrairrnan of ,ha Guard, arrta fps. Susan Mistr, Pub1~ Reiatlans t~zanager, Central Fltlellty EianKS, Inc., N. U. f3ox 27602, Richrrrvnd,VA 2321. Again, wrrgratulatioros on t~eing the 1993-94 Central fidelity t;Up athletic winners. Sincerely, ~~ Ken Tilley ExecuUVe Director KGT/SdC Enclosure 07.E 19.91 16:03 X3876118 ~ttir<ttn atn fotllTs ATRLETIC GltOlri A CLENVAR tiS ...~ o ..Alq TOTrn. TALL TDTAL vllrTeR TOTAL !/ Rill6 TdfAl GLEYYAR l 210.00 7'2.50 0.00 137.;0 F'DiE;IL YAI.LEY 2 1b5.00 60.04 37.50 87.50 rTTNE, rzoAaE (wrrnE> 5 155.00 30.OD 90.OD 75.00 CILES 4 150.00 135.04 p,DO 15.40 8iRAiWRG 5 r4o.oo 95.00 to.oo 25.00 [lYTRAL SEYIOR fLUYEY) 6 ftie) 125.00 e0.00 0.40 45.00 MOMItOE, flrLllAMI 6 i25.D0 15.00 50.00 30.00 iRE11TSYtlIE M1tlTIItGT A i7.2.5n 0.00 50.00 7'2.50 SU$SEX CEYTRAL 1+ 11i.>0 3T.5O 55.00 40.00 RgITNA1p10M t0 105.00 20.04 Ln.00 45.OD FRANKLIN 11 (tie) 97.50 O.W 6O.OU 37.50 HEY KENT 11 97.50 52.50 22.50 ~7.Sff •• FLOYD CITY t3 (tiC) 90.00 50.00 0.00 ~.~ RErrRT, pATRtCK fCt) 13 90.00 10.00 0_DO 34.00 MIDDLESEX 13 90.00 50.00 D.00 1+0.00 CCNTRAL 1Y00DST00K> 76 17.60 50.00 37.50 O.M APpALACNtA 17 (tsC) 82.50 +15.00 0.04 SI.~(1 NA90r~ eceRCE Ja.-sa, i7 ax.so D.oo n,oo Ea.so atAD[sDY txXtptY t4 (cie) 7s.0D 37.50 0,00 37.50 YlLlOM 1(p10RIAL i9 75.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 EUFFALD GP 21 b7.54 45.00 22.50 0.00 I~LLY~ i.J. SZ GS.00 15.00 0,00 30.00 .uatattsGY, STdtEYALL (MJ) 23 ttic) 60.00 60.00 0.00 0.04 TYTM SPRtNG6 23 60.00 0.00 37.50 22.50 NAYSI 25 ttie) 52.50 52.50 O,OD 0.00 LURAY 25 SZ.50 37.50 0.00 15.00 POWNATAM 77 50.00 0.00 O.OD 50.00 (3tRRLES GlTY COUNTY 2s (tle) 45.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 COEiI1RR 2a 65.00 O.OD 45.OD 0.00 ESSEX 28 k5.00 22.50 0.00 22.50 ,Writ RIVER 2fl 45.00 4.M n.00 45.00 KIYO YILLIAN Zir 45.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 NceuleR, PAaRr 2E 45.00 0.00 is.m 0.06 STUARTS DRAFT ZS 4S.U0 0.00 45.00 D.00 ORA1'0011 OdRiTT 35 <ei•) 37.50 0.00 0.00 '17.50 MORTNYtQOD 35 37.50 O.W 37.50 0.00 RURAL RCTRCAT 3S 37.50 I7.E0 0.00 0.00 WICKER. TNOMAs 35 37.50 37.50 D.aD u.(w AMELIA DOtRITY 39 35.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 RIYERf~AU$ 40 30.00 D.00 3D,00 0.00 (Or!!rl [~ 003 C~7 ~ 19.9~L 15 ~ ~~ '3871511$ CLENVAk HS ~ ~c~9 Virginia Hi~tl School League, Inc. ih4~ Swu 1-urrh t;<,ulcrnrd (hurlrtltesvilic. Virgini:, ~'!9{1! tit)4 977-ttd~4 FOR IMMEDIA7S q>9LEASE June t2, 1994 Cohtact: Ken Tilley, VHSL, 804-9T7•s47$ Susan Miist~. CentFai Fidelity National Aank, t304-697.7261 VlliGiNIA H1GN 3CF1O0L LEAdUE ANNOUNCES C11aMP1ON5 IN FIFTFI CINTRAI Fld1=L1TY CUP ATHLETIC COMPE'hTIQIV First-time winnerGlenvar (Group A) joins rhraa•tirnarhampien Tabb (Croup AA} and two-time finalist Woodbridge High Sciwul (Group AAA) asihe 1 yyq c; antral Fidehly Gap winners for mterscha testis athletic oxceltonco. Sponsored dy the Vlrgtnta HIQh School League (VHSL) end (:antral Ficirslity Nati+nnal bank, this prestigious award raeogniaoatha public high schods in Virginia whic}1 drra judynnl to Irxvd Ihu be51 overall iMerSChclastic athletic and academic programs each year. Six cups arc pr*s^Nod, one for athbtics and ono for aoadomix, in each of the VHSL`s three ctasShtCatlOns (Group A schopts have entaNments up to 500, Group AA 501 •t000, and Groufa AAA t nn1 and above). Winnort: of the Central Fdolity Cup award arc dotormined by a {.taint system based on performance in VHSL state eornpetitions. Schools eam athletic points from the sports of cress mtrntry, hackpt- ball, outdoor traoit and tennis for boyo and girls in each daaailicatiom god, wresUing, and basabal; tar boys antl Softball for gins to each dassNication: football (iwo divisions in each rfAettifir:atirsn); field hodcoy (AAA girls); volioybap (/1 and 11A girta); gymnastics (AAA); -ntloor tracts (AAA onry, boys amt giriq); antl soccer (AAA twys, AAA girls and AA boys). Points are awartled on the failowlnq basis: first place 50. s4wnd plree 45, third place 40, fourth piano ~, tittle piano 30, sixth F~~ 2tS, seventh place Z0, eighth t5. In the event OS a tie, iha schools receivr an equal number of polo?s hasad nn the ntrmbt?r N cehoolt:whiohtie andthanumber of achoodswhich finish higharinthe standings. Fa example, the gins' softball quarterfinal losers aquauy diviria total poirrts tar fifth through eighth place 122,5 pointtt cash) white semifinal losers split third and fourth (rtnub (37.5 lxtirltD each). Gbnvpr gv4rwltelmed th4 Group A field by a ~rgng spring beasvn. The FFighlanders'total of 2 S d included 137.5 p0irns from the spring season where they earned semifinal points in softball and ohrsmpion~hg>3 in buys tonnio and baseball Powell Valley, which had bran to savrnth place aflerth®Wlrttersports season, earnetl 165 points avrrrall and performed watt ar elate in noys track (champion) and bat:ohall (oamHinaliet) Chic opring. G,eorga Wyche {iv )finished third pveral(, followed b)r titles {150) and Strasburg (fai)l, Tubb (24t?",) climbed tram fourth plate rsher the wiutar tsuxlsun to win the Group /-A cup for the third time. The Tigers were co• champions in 1gQ1 (with lalacket~g), nrtd dsimod the cup outright in t tit8¢. Tabb enjoyed a sucsaassful sprtrtg won a state aria in boys soccer, finisht:tg seaQrad in baseball, reaching the quarterfinals in VHSL Centre! Fidettty Cup softball and placing eighth in boys freak, 8lackaburq and York tied far second wqh 222.5 points. Biadtsburg earned points m three spring Sports -bays tennis (runner•up), hays artr:mr (tluarterf finalist), and girls track (eighth), witiile York Gaimsd points in twys sutxxrr arse goys tennis (somrfinalwt) and baseball (quartertinalist). Rounding out thr top flora warty .lnhn Nanrilay (2(tg) and Western Al6orrtado (160}, Wnnrttxiripa rl2imec+ Its second cup with 272.5 points after having won R in 1991. Woodbridge earned oven bail u( ss fwirus during the spring 5easdn with runner•up (inIShCS in girls Sbocer and softball, quartarfinai finichos in bays tennis and bcyc toot:or and a sixth place finish in Goys track. Runner-up Frank rvox (lr:.ti) 9oored in boys soccer (runner-up) and rJirlt snrrAr (quarterfinaGst), whie Midlothian (21 S) finished third with points from d sl~lla chdmlrionship in softball, g lr~s soccer (semif ina;ist) and boys soccer (quarterfinalist). Contrevido tinuhad fourth ovoraA (20t)), while Miil. Godwin (195) finished fifUi. "All of ttt6 winnerP this year dictenguiohod thonxtelves with exceptional petiunirantxa,' t;rdirl VHSL Executive DireGlOf Earl Gillaspir. "Tftev truly Deserve fD be recoQnaed for atrrfrlGrt~ in atMotics, ao do the other 170 echggie who oarnod Central 1=idoldy Gup points this year. These programs era of tremendous value to boys and girls throuphbut the Onnantnnwpahh." t ha Cup dseff is a distinctive, high quaiitty sliver Oup trophy supplied by Virginia Horff Jonot roproCOntativo.. Winners of iha 4 99a r+c:e~iarni~; wmpetition were Madispn Gaunty (Group A), Abing• don(GroupAA)andJamesMadisen(GrnufaAAA} Aczedemicpcints arc oarnod farpericrmanoes in the VHSL activities aFdabata, dran~tr., forensics, Creative writing and school publications, l~revtdus ace" dama_: winner); hdv4 been Saint Paul in 1993 and Prir,rp Edward County in 1990, 1991, 9952 {Ciraup Aj; Abingdon in 1990, 1991, t g92, 1993 (Group AA); and Monacan in 1990.1992, Woodbridge anA Jamct~ Mar;ison (tic) in 1991 and James bfadtvon in 1003. Previous athletic cup winners have been Sussex Central in 1 tit90, 1091 and t 992 and Strasburg in f rJ03 (Group A); 8leckabulg 'n t 890, 1993 noel tid~f with Tdt~ in 199 i and Tabb in 1992 jGrpup AA):and Frank Cox in 1990,1993, Wondbridf3e in 1991 and 1 anrJlpy in 1992 (Group AAA). (Note: Cornfilalr rlitktlc {:ruisrt srttrrztdltnya by CVssiiiwfbn err andoaad.l ED KOHINKE 6913 Bradshaw Road ~ ir~~~ / Salem, Virginia 24153 ~ J~ (703)384-8013 (FAX OR VOCE) July 18, 1994 To: Lee Eddy Elmer Hodge Subject: VACo Newsletter 7/15/94 There are two items in this issue that I would like to have addressed in at least a preliminary report at our next regular board meeting: 1. On Page 1, the article "Retirees Settlement Will Cause Local Mandate", raises at least two questions: how will this affect us? What might we have to do to address it? 2. Starting on Page 7, the article on the Anti-Crime Bill states that Roanoke County will receive over $200,000 "to prevent crime". How do we plan to put that to use? EGK/bj h cc: Board Reading File Paul Mahoney Mary Allen °; ,--- r y,~y ~', r~ ._- ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JULY 26, 1994 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS a 1. Resolution 'of Congratulations to Glenvar High School for Winning the Fifth Annual Central Fidelity Cup Athletic Competition. r ~ ~~ 2 r ; ,-r, ,. t r.'. ,.~ 3. Resolution Declaring the Weekend of July 30 - 31, 1994 as "The Battle of South Salem". Recognition of Melinda Rector for Receiving Certification as Professional Secretary. D. BRIEFINGS 1.~ Briefing and Video by Appalachian Power Company on Storm Related Outages. (Vickie Ratliff, Public Relations, APCO) E. NEW BUSINESS ~ p 1. Re t for A p iation for m Damage Expenses. .~ g~ `p ane , Direct r of 'ante) -- W 2. Request for Approval of Drainage Projects. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) Request for Amendment to the Performance Agreement 3. for Hanover Direct. (Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development) 4. Request for Adoption of Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1995-99. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 5. Request for Appropriation for Roanoke County School a Board to Purchase Property. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 6. Request for Adoption of Surplus Property Policy. (John Willey, Property Manager) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA P ~~ . ~,.~ ~,,~ ,, ,J~ ~ ~~ ~' .., ;~~~ ` ~ F ~~ f } j` 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-2 to C-2 to Operate a Garden Center Located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of John A. Hall. 2. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Fast Food Restaurant at the Intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Westmoreland Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the petition of Tacoma, Inc. 3. An Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Allow Replacement Only of Individually Sited Single Wide Manufactured (Mobile) Homes Throughout Roanoke County with a Newer Single Wide Mobile Home. 3 I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ t ~ ,,~- ~, L' t J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Certain Sections of Chapter 20. Solid Waste, Pertaining to Expanded Definitions, Specific and Supplemental Collection Categories and Services, Bulk and Brush Collection, and Effective and Expiration Dates. (Gardner Smith, Director of General Services) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Committee 3. Social Services Advisory Board I.. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WH,L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 4 1. Approval of June 14, 1994, and June 28, 1994 Minutes 2. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 4. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. 5. Confirmation of Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. M. REPORTS AND INQUIIZIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -June 1994 5. Dixie Caverns Feasibility Study. 6. Report on Anti-Crime Bill. 5 7. Report on Retirees Settlement. 8. Bond Project Status Report P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Disposition of Real Property, Namely, to Consider an Offer to Exchange Surplus Well Lot for Two Year Easement; (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Pinkard Court Project; (3) To Consider the Acquisition of Real Property for Water Transmission Line Project~~ ~ ~'~ ~. (~ R. S. T. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION WORK SESSIONS 1. School Board on Capital Projects. 2. Work Session with Fire and Rescue Ad Hoc Committee. EVENING SESSION PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Operate a Private Horse Stable Located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, 6 Upon the Petition of Roger and Barbara Hale. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Facility for Religious Assembly, Including Classrooms and Fellowship Hall, Located on Hardy Road at the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of D. Jeffry Parkhill. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance to Rezone 2.76 Acres from R-1 to I-1 to Construct a Warehouse Distribution Facility Located on Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Mona S. Sutphin. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance Vacating a Surplus Right-of--Way Located on Autumn Park Drive as Recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Vaughn Incorporated. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 6. Ordinance Vacating a 0.004 Acre and a 0.002 Acre Portion of a Dedicated Right-of--Way as Recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ron Jackson. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) U. CITIZEN CO11~Il1~NTS AND COlbIlVIU1VICATIONS V. WORK SESSION (5:00 p.m.) 1. Consideration for County Maintenance of Stormwater Detention Ponds. W. ADJOURNMENT