Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/23/1994 - Regulara~ RAN fit` . p a 1836 ~~~~~ C~.o~~txt#~ ~~ ~.~~z~.o~~E ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD O~ SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 23, 1994 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will. be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement In order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements maybe made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:06 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Philip Motley Grandin Court Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag... B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NATIONAL TOLT]EirfAMENT TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM K-13 i ® Recycled Paper ECH ADDED (1) EXECUTIVE SESSION DISCUSSION OF ACQUISITION OF INTEREST IN REAL ESTATE FOR THE DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES;,_(2) ITEM V-4 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LEASE OF ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR USE BY DEPT. OF SOCIAL C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOG1vITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the Retirement of Leonard J. Wade. R-823941 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC MR. WADE WAS PRESENT AND ALSO RECEIVED $100 SAVINGS BOND 2. Resolution Recognizing the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament to be held in Roanoke County on September 24, 1994. MOVED TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM K-13 3. Presentation from Virginia Amateur Sports to Roanoke County. EXEC. DIR PETER IAMPMAN PRESENTED T-SHIRTS AND PLAOUE TO_BOARD MEMBERS AND THANKED THEM FOR THEIR SUPPORT. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Approval of a Surplus Property Policy. (John Willey, Property Manager) A-823942 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE #3 URC JOHN WILLEY TO BRING BACK OFFICIAL POLICY FOR ADOPTION 9 3 94 2. Recommendation on Changes to the Utility Billing Procedures. (Paul Grice, Assistant Finance Director) A-82394-3 AYES-FM, HCN. LBE - --- ` 'W"vl~u~~,1~LH11V1~1 NAYS-BL-T,EGK 1ST READING - 9/13/94. 2ND 9/27/94 3• Request for Extension of Water Line to Serve Hanover Direct. (Timothy Gubala, Economic Development Director) A-82394-4 Fi71VD AYES-BLT FGK.FM.HCN NAYS-NONE ABSTAIN-LBE 4. Request for Additional Funds for Bushdale Road. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-82394-5 FUND URC E. REQUESTS; FOR.- WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work 'Session Roanoke River Corridor Board. on September 13, 1994 on the Overlay District and Advisory 3 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIItST RFADIlVG OF REZONING ORDINANCES _ CONSENT AGENDA URC 1. Ordinance to rezone .409 acre from AV Conditional to C-2 to Allow Retail Uses, Located at 5449 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Kingery Bros. Associates. 2. Ordinance to Rezone Approximately Ten Acres from R-3 Conditional to C-1 to Construct an Office Complex, Located at the Intersection of Airport Road and Dent Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation. 3. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct and Operate an Electric Substation, Located on Kirk Lane, off Cotton Hill Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Appalachian Power Company. 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Building for Religious Assembly..: Including Classrooms, Office and Recreational Facilities, Located on Northridge Lane, Approximately 700 Feet: Northwest of Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of North Valley Seventh-Day Adventist Church. 5. Ordinance Amending the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Include a Planned Commercial Development District and a Planned Industrial Development District. 4 H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Donation of an Undivided Interest in a Portion of the Roanoke Regional Landfill to the United States of American for National Park Service Blue Ridge Parkway Spur to Virginia's Explore Park. (Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 9/13/94 URC LBE TO MEET WITH PMM REGARDING ORDINANCE LANGUAGE 2. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Extending Across a Portion of a Well Lot in LaBellevue. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) B T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/13/94 URC 3. Ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Drainage Easement from the heirs of Bernard I. Payne for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/13/94 URC ,s ; 4. ;Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Pe°r~nanenf Access and Emrironmental Clean-up Easement from Appalachian Power Company In Connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney FM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/13/94 s URC 5. Ordinance and Resolution In Connection with Improvements to Kenworth Road and Valleypointe Parkway. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) a. Ordinance Authorizing Donation of 0.518 Acre of Land to the Commonwealth of Virginia in Connection with Improvements to and Acceptance of Kenworth Road and Valleypointe Parkway into the VDOT Secondary System. B T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/13/94 URC b. Resolution Requesting VDOT to add Link A - 0.12 Mile of Kenworth Road to the Secondary System and to Abandon Link B - 0.10 mile of Kenworth Road. R-82394-6 BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board MHA TO CONTACT JIM PHIPPS 2. Grievance Panel HCN TO CONTACT VINCENT REYNOLDS 6 3. Industrial Development Authority LBE NOMINATED RONALD MARTIN TO ANOTHER 4YEAR TERM EXPIRING 9/26/98 BI{T NOMINATED T. CARSON OUARLES TO ANOTHER 4YEAR TERM EXPIRING 9/26/98 K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII~L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-823947 BI.~T MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO WITH ITEM K-13 ADDED URC 1. Approval of July 12 and July 26, 1994 Minutes 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Social Services Advisory Board and the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission. A-823947.a 3. Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Barrens Road. A-823947.b 4. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Advanced Auto/Perimeter East. A-823947.c 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. A-82394-7.d 6. Resolution of Support for Construction of a National D- Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. R-82394-7.e 7. Request for Acceptance of Mallard Lane Estates into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-82394-7.f 8. Resolution Extending Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV. R-82394-7.g 9. R-82394-7.h 10. A-82394-7.i 11. A-82394-7.i 12. A-82394-7.k 13. R-82394-7.1 Resolution for Extension of Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. Request from the School Board for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund for the Tech Prep Consortium. Approval of Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. 2ri Resolution Recognizing the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament to the Held in Roanoke COunty on September 24, 1994 L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS s Snpemsor Nickens: ~1) Asked about the study of the viewshed for the Blue Ridge Parkway. ECIi encouraged BOS to attend and hear Carlton Abbott who has been hired by the Parkway. (2) Asked about the agenda for the joint meetings. ECH advised that some meetings will be limited to informal discussions and others may include discussion on specific issues. Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Suggested that the meetings include a "laundry list" for discussion at future joint meetings with the valley governing bodies. (2) Asked for a community meeting with the residents of Chester Drive to include staff and VDOT to discuss timelines. etc. for road improvements. X31 Asked about Valleypointe. ECH responded this will be discussed in Executive Session. Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Attended LGOC conference on 8/14 to 8/16 and felt it was very productive and useful. (2) Advised that FM and he are on the subcommittee for cooperation of the New Century Council. Supervisor Eddy: (1) Announced he felt that the brochure for solid waste was well done; ~2) advised that EGK will attend the Blacksburg meeting on the New Institute of Government seminar. (3) Asked for a states report on enforcement of the new cat ordinance and on the number of licenses sold. ECH will have for 9/13/94 meeting. (4) Asked about the year-end budget surplus. ECH advised figures will be available in 30 to 45 days. M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COl~'IlViUNICATIONS Roy Lochner, 6050 Poage Valley Road, spoke about crime and 6nrglaries that have not yet been solved. asked for a monthly status report for fire and police LBE asked ECH to ,provide a states report at an upcoming meeting. N. REPORTS B ~T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 5 - UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Account Paid -July 1994 5. Bond Project Status Report 6. Fire and Rescue Department Reaction/Response Times - June 1994, July 1994. O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session on Private SSE/R Program (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) BOARD CONSENSUS TO GO FORWARD WITH RECONIII~NDED CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCE. GR WILL BRING BACK FOR 1ST AND 2rID READING - 9/27/94 AND 10/11/94 P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Disposition of Real Property, Namely, a Well Lot and property known as Ogden Center; acquisition of real estate for :Social Service, and potential litigation, i.e. enforcement of admissions: tax. B ~T MOTION AT 5:25 P.M. URC R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-82394-8 B ~T MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT io CERTIFICATION AT 7:05 P.M. EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND RF,ADING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-2 to C-2 to Operate a Garden Center Located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of John A. Hall. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-82394-9 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. An Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to Allow Replacement Only of Individually Sited Single Wide Manufactured (Mobile) Homes Throughout Roanoke County with a Newer Single Wide Mobile Home. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-823940-10 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CHANGES RECOMII~NDED BY LBE URC STAFF DIRECTED TO NOTIFY OWNERS OF SINGLE-WIDE MOBILE HOMES OF CHANGES TO THE ORD. T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the FY 1995-99 Capital Improvements Program. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. Comments on the County CIP NO CITIZENS SPOKE b. Comments on the School CIP ii 9 CITIZENS SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF A $30 MILLION BOND REFERENDUM CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. ROBEKI liV~-1~lAlr ~rv~ rwvvi .~.••••--~.-- -- - - MOUNTAIN ROAD• APOLOGIZED TO STAFF ANDS O GID HIS OWN RADAR AND WAS NOT AS BAD RE UESTED THAT POLICE COr~TINUE TO DRIVE THROUGH DURING PEAK TRAFFIC PERIODS. ?, RANDALL HANCOCK, EXPRESSED COERING PINES PARK CONSTRUCTION GOING ON AT WHISP AND RESIDENTS NOT BEING INFORMED; (21 PROBLEMS WITH 'T'RAFFIC SPEEDING AND TRASH FASI ED WHY THERE THE BALLFIELDS AT THE PARK; AND (31 WAS NOT GOING TO BE MORE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR CHII~REN. LBE ASKED STAFF TO CHECK ON PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. ~511~IINUTE RECESS AT 8:15 P.M. U. WORK SESSION RECONVENED AT 8:21 P.M SCHOOL BOARD RECONVENED FROM THEIR MEETING ON 8/11/94 1. Work Session.. with the School Board on School Capital ~.. , Imprawement Program (CIP). (Dr. Deanna Gordon, - School Superintendent) PRESENTED BY DR. GORDON B T AND -EGK ADVISED TI~'Y SUPPORTED A $~0 NIILLIOI' REFERENDUM TO INCLUDE CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL. LBE FM HCN ADVISED THEY WERE NOT READY AT THIS TIIVIE T~ 12 SUPPORT A X30 MILLION BONDA V, NEW BUSINESS 1, Approval of Bond Resolutions jtL-7VLV yava ~ - - - MILLION BOND REFERENDUM -DEFEATED AYES BL~T,EGK NAYS-FM~ICN,LBE AYES - BLOT. EGK NAYS- FM, HCN, LBE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES. NIILLION FOR TECHNOLOGY R-82394-11 - URC 2. Resolution Adopting the County FY 1995-99 Capi 13 Improvements Program. Manager) R_g2394-12 g MOTION TO ADOPT RES® .vac uT T rGK FM,HCN A i NAYS-LBE 3, Resolution Adopting the Improvements Program. Manager) R g2394-13 B MOTION TO ADS RESO AYES BI T,EG~-PM,H NAYS-LBE 4, O_g2394-14 URC (Brent llobertson, Budget F'Y 1995-99 SchO°l Budlget (Brent Robert , Ordinance Authorizing Execution of a Lease Agreemen~ for Additional Space for Use by the Department of Socia Services. W. CITIZEN COMr~NTS AND CO~~ICA7'IONS 1, Robert Bostian to speak regarding speeding on Sugarlc Mountain Road. SPOKE EARLIER IN THE MEETING X. ADJOURNMENT TO MONDAY, SEPTEMBER~TI2,ME1 E~ 12:00 NOON FOR THE PURPO OUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH THE ROANOKE CI'T'Y C THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHOR] OFFICES B MOTION TO AD OURN AT 10:25 P.M. UW 14 QOAN ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ Z z OJ a 183$ BOARD OF SUPER~SORS RO~OKE COi7NTY AGENDA AUGUST ~~ 1994 Regular eivisors meeting• at 3:00 Board of SuP 1`uesday oanoke County and the fourth of eacl Welcome to the R Tuesday Tuesday the second on the fourth meetings are held on ounCed. blic hear1°gs are held aedule ~ be a~ p.m• Pu this sch month. Deviations from ement in . o require assistance or special arrang other of Supervisors meetings or disabilities wh lease contact the IndNiduals with ate in or attend Boardoanoke County, P order to particip onsored by R re oast that you Provide at least 48 prog~ms and activities sP 772-2005- We q ade• Clerk to the Board at (703) n ements maY ~ -n hours notice so that proper arra 9 G CEREMO~S ~3'~ P.M•) A, OPENIN 1. Roll Call. Motley The Reverend Philip ist Church 2. Invocation: Grandin Court Bap lle lance to the United States Flag• 3. Pledge of A g ONES ADD TOE OR CgANGE B• REQUESTS TO pOSTP ORDER OF AGENDA CMS PROCLAMA1'IONS~ C. AWARDS RESOI,UZ'IONS~ RECOGNI'riONS i ® RecYded Paper D. 1. 2. 3. ' tion upon the Retirement of of Apprec~a Resolution Wade. Leonard J• erica National nizing the TaeKwonDo Am on September Resolution Recog oanoke County Tournament to be held in R 24,1994. ' inia Amateur Sports to Roanoke Presentation from Virg County NEw BUSINESS policy. (John royal of a Surplus Property 1. Request for APp Manager) Willey, Property Billie es to the Utility on Chang 2. Recommendation aul Grice, Assistant Finance Director procedures. (P I-Ianw~ r Extension of Water Li om a SeDeevelopme 3. Request fo Gubala, Econ Direct. (Timothy Director) ' 'onal Funds for Bushdale Road. (Arne 4. Request for Addltl sneering & Inspections) Covey, Director of Eng' VESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS E. ItEQ 1994 on r Work Session on September 13, 1. Request fo rridor pverlay District and Advi Roanoke River Co Board. GS VESTS FOR P~~C ~~ F. REQ FIRST ItF~ G AND SST FOR PUBIC Y~p NSENT AGENDA G• REQ G ORD~CE OF gBZONIN V Conditional dinanCe to rezone .409 acre d oa 5449 Franklin 1, Or Locate to Allow Retail Uses, 2 • t upon the petition of Magisterial Distric ~ Cave Spring Kinge~, Bros, Associates. Ten Acres from R-3 tely lex, 2. 3. 4. I3. roxiYna Office Comp ezone AppConstruct an and Dent Ordinanc al ° to C-1 to of Airport Road etition of COndted at the Intersection on the p Loca a isterial District, Corporation. Road, gollinsanor Apartment Villag Fr1endship M permit tc Special Use Located o~ Ordinance Authorizing a rin Magisteri~ An rate an Electric Sub S tiong, ill Road, Cave p paws Construct a offOCotton S~ of Appalachian Kirk Lane, the petition upon District, Constr~ C°mpany• a Special Use Permit to Classroo~ uthorizing ssembly Including orthri Ordinance A eli ions A Located on N for R g est of Peters CI a Buildari Recreational Fa elet irlorthw Office ately ~~~ F the petitio Approxim Upon Lane' awba Magisterial ~ ent st' Church• Road' Cat Seventh-Day Adv North Valley the Roanoke Cc TeXt of m~ mending t Include a Planne ed C Indu 5• Ordinance A nd a plann Zoning Ordina D~ trict a Development Development District. ING OF ORDINANCES L1n FIRST R~ Donation of an uthorizing the R°an°ke Regional I'a~ 1• Ordinance A ortion of the for National Park Interest in a P erican inia's Exp1oY the United States of Am ur to Virg parkway SpDevelopment Specialist) Blue Ridge (Joyce Waugh' Econ°mi of an Easy Com,eyance Electric Authorizing Company for 2• Ordinance paver Well Lot in L Appalachian ortion of a County Attorn Across a P Extending Sr• Assistant (Joseph Obenshain, 3 permanent izing the Acquisition of a pane for author om the heirs of Bernard I' rovement 3. Ordinance Drainage Imp Drainage Easement frgoad and County Attorney the pinkard Court Sr. Assistant project.. (Joseph Obenshain, of a permanent Acquisition from Auth°rizing the Easeon ewith the Ordinance ental C Inn Connects 4. and Ernironm Access power Company J°Seph Obenshain, Sr. Appalachian Landfill Site. ( Dixie Caverns County Attorney wit' Assistant Connection oink Resolution In Va11eyP and Road and Coun 5• Ordinance Kenworth Sr. Assistant ents to ImprOVem (Joseph Obenshain, park'ay• Acre Attorney) of 0.518 Donation Virginia uthorizing ealth of a. Ordina to the C°minonw tang Land roVements to and Aca pinto with Imp Valleypointe park' y COnnectionRoad and genwOrth S stem. VDOT Secondary y Link A - VDOT tO add uestin oad to the Secondary S3 b. ResolutioK ~°rth R - 0.10 mile of Kern Mile of Link B and to Abandon Road. IlvG OF OgDINANCES I. SECOND RED NTS J• AppOI~N"1'~ rrections Resources Board 1. Community Co 2. Grievance panel trial Development Authority 3, Indus K. CONSENT AGENDA 4 D UNDER THE CONSENT AG ALL MATI'E~ LISTS BOARD TO BE ROUTINE ARE CONSIDE~D BY THE SOLU'T'ION ~ THE FORM ~I, BE ENACTED BY ONE ~ ELOw• ~ DISCUSSION IS cONS~ENT OR FORMS ~~ BE MOVED FROM THE THAT ITEM BE CONSIDE~D SEPARATELY. AGENDA AND ~'L 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. oval of July 12 and July 26~ 1994 Minutes Appr ommittee Appointments to the Soared Confirmation of C Board and the Hig~ay Services Advisory Transportation Safety Commission. 6. 7. 8. Resolution for Extension of bl 1 Roanoke, Inc. 9. s b Cox Ca Cable Rate Filing y Water Facilities Serving Barrens Road. Acceptance of f Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving AdvanCe~ Acceptance o Autofperimeter East. Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Gan Approval of a School P.T.A• from the Penn Forest Elementary al • n of Support for Construction of a Nation Resolutio Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. cce tance of Mallard Lane Estda s Sy t~ Request for A P ortation Secon ry Virginia Department of Transp of Basic Cable I Time for Revia d/bla Salem C' Resolution Extending Filings by Boothe American Comp y 1'V. Review of I f Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving W' 10, Acceptance o Subdivision. from the School Board for Appropriation ' 11. Request Consortium. School Grant Fund for the Tech Prep s permit from the Cave 12. Approval of Raffle ElementarS' Sch°ol P.T•A• NiBERS USES OF BOARD NIE REPORTS A~ Il~Q L• CATIONS NTS ANA COb~UNI CITI~NS~ CO1VID~ M• Spring N. REPORTS alance l Fund Unappropriated B 1. Genera alance . l Fund Unappropriated B 2• Capita Board Contingency Fund 3. Account Paid -July 1994 4. and prO~ect Status Report nt ReactionlResponse Tip 5. B Departure 6• Fire and Rescu1994• June 1994, July O. P• Q• WORK SESSIONS 1. on PrNate Work Session Director) Robertson, Utility SSE1R Program OR ~DIA QUES~ONS RECESS F Code of virgin ursuant to the Disposition E~C~'IVE SESS1O3 To Consider the 44 A ~ ell Lot and property kn~ Section 2.1-3 property Namely' a W Center. 6 CATION OF E~'~EC~~ SESSION g, CERTIFI EVENING SESSION READING OF HEARING AND SECOND S' ~~NCES Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-Z ke Road, 1• An Ordinance to e a Garden Center Located at 4on 5theapetition o1 Operat C~,e Spring Magisterial District, Planning & Zoning John A. Hall. (Terry Harrington, Director) Amend the Text of the RoanokeOn, un( 2. An Ordinance to Replacement y Ordinance to Allow Mobil Zoning le Wide Manufactured Individually Sited Sing with a Newer Sing Homes Throughout Roanoke County ton, planning Wide Mobile Hon1e• (Terry Hawing Zoning Director) PUBLIC I,~gINGS T. 1995 rin for Citizen Comment on b rtF n~ Bud 1, public Hea g ram. (Brent R Capital Improvements Prog Manager) a, Comments on the County CIP b, Comments on the School CIp U. WORK SESSION • n with the School Board on SGordon, 1, Work Sessio CIp). (Dr, Deanna Improvement Program School Superintendent) V. NEW BUSINESS ` Capital ounty FY 1995-99 Budget ting the C Robertson, Resolution AdOP (Brent 1• ents Pr°gram. Improvem ital Manager) Sehool Cap. 1995-99 Budget tion Adopting the Brent Robertson, 2• ReSOIu eats Program• Improvem Manager) royal of Bond ReS°lutions 3, ApP CA'rIONs NTS AND C011~I u arlo w• CI'iZ~N COIVINIB a arding speeding on S g ostian to speak r g 1• R°bert B oad. Mountain R X• AO10L~tN~NT s f r ROANORE VISORS OF TION CENTER G OF THE $Og g COIINTY ~MINISTRA AT A REGnLARA HELD AT THA R ~GnST 23, 1994 SENT COUNTY r VIRGIN ON TUESD Y UPON THE gETI TNiENT COUNTY POLICE DEPAR -1 OF APPRECIATION d in February REgOLUTION 823 pADE- ROANORE was first emPlOYe OF LEONARD 1. Leonard J' Wade so served as a Police pHEREAg. utY Sheriff ~ and has a of 1974 as a DeP emplOYed with the tenant; and while Off icer-j,leu Leonard J• Wade' the Roanoke Count WgEREAB, tion on distinc $erved with t~ Commission; and ears County gafetY for several Y tion and J• a was orta Wad t Unit under bO Transp Leonard Law Enforcemen ~iEREA$. iliary tment% and of the Aux officer ent and the Police Depar commanding loY~nent w Departm through hls emp the Sheriff s J• Wade, the quality Leonard improving NgEREASr trumental in oke CountY~ has been ins Roan that the Boar citizens. RESOLVED life for its BE IT eXpresse° THEREFORE. hereby NOW. Virginia' CountY~ of citizen the goanoke tion of apprecia of cai Supervisors and the ears appreciation WADE for over twenty Y deepest to LEONARD J and County to goanoke CountY% goanoke vice of Super 1 and dedicated ser SOLVED. that the B°ard rQ loya , FURTHER, BE IT RE a happy. restful' and P Tess its best wishes for does exp •x to adopt the reSO1'zt retirement. Minni On mots°Y1 °f Supervisor vote: owing recorded Nickens, carried by the f°ll one gohinke. Minnix, Supervisors JOhns p,YES : None NAY 5 A Copy TE5TE: lle~ Clerk of Supervisors H • Board goanoke County File ns of Appreciation Flle CC: geSOlutio -~ RO~ORE OF SUPERVISORS OF TION CENTER BOAS y ADMINISTRA ORE COUNT1994 g HEFTED AT THE ROAN 23r p'Ty VIRG NIA. HON TUESDAY. AUGUST E gETIREME TMENT COUN UPON TH DEPAR OF APPRECIATIO COUNTY POLICE toy February gEgOLUTION gOANORE ed in pADE- f first emp OF LEONARD ~' J• Wade was sere as a Police Leonard ed ~EgEAg, and has also as a Deputy Sheriff; with the of 197 4 ed and while emplOY t% county Officer-Lieutenan J• Wade- Leonard the R°an°ke ~EgEAS . on tination dis with and the served fission; ears countY- Safety Comm for several Y tion and J• Wade was Transp°rta Leonard nforcement Unit under ° WHEgEAS- E • cer of the Auxiliary LaW Department' and offs wi Police cO~anding h his employment and the e Sheriff's Department thr°ug Wade. the quality th Leonard J• improving ~IEREAS- trumental in has been ins County- the Board goanoke ens• t tha citiz IT gESpI,VED lif or its resses e f NOW. THEREFORE. BE Virginia, hereby exp itizen countY~ the c ervis°rs of RoanoKe the appreciation °f of cap Sup and t years eepest appreciation J• WADE for over twee Y and d to yEONARD CountY~ County t° goanoke B°a Super Roan°Ke i,ce that the rd of sere and dedicated 1oya1- BE IT RESOLVED. restful, and pr°~ ,FUgTHERr for a happY- express its best Wishes does retirement' ACTION NO' .~ ~' - ITEM NUMBER SUPERVISORS OF RCENTER g p,NOKE~ COUNTY ADMINISTRp,TION AT A REGULAR MEETI AT THE COUNTY- VIRGINIA HELD August 23, 1994 the Roanoke County from MEETING DATE: to Pre5entatAmateur Sports AGENDA ITEM: Virginia TOR-g COMMENTS: COIIN`rY ADMINI5TRA S~p,RY OF INFORMATION' Amateur Sports, ha: Virginia to the Count} Director of re5entation ation in the Lampman, Executive to make a p d particip peter time on the agenda requested in appreciation for its of Roanoke onwealth Games. Virginia Comm support an Elmer C• Hodge County Administrator __________________________'--- VOTNo yes ---------------- ACTION - Eddy -- Approved ( j Motion bY~ Denied ( Received Referred ~ To -~ Johnson ~ -- Kohinke - - Minnix N ickens ~~ !~ ~ H LL.. O ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ ~ J m ~ 1 ~ W 0 ~ U ~ ~ =i ~ 'd' r r r N ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ - ^ ~ _ - = ~ ~ N U N 4~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Q o ~ ~ ~ ~ V O Q), N ~ N ~ ~ ~ N D O 0 0 ~ N ~ U U } ~ m = O ~ x~ ~U ~ ~ ~ cn ~ Q O U O~ N Q ~ ~ O Q ~ 0 0 O ?, ~ - ~ ~~ O Q Q v ~ O U °~ v~0 ~ ~- N L ~ Q ~ N N O ~ ~~~ ~ ~ O (n ~ ~ ~ _ C Q i O ~ Y ~ ~ N i i -O L ~ N i V X '' ~ O O '- N O C~ Q- U cn cv N ~ c J ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ .~ •~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ O N U ~ Q N N -~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ (n N ~ L N a~ ~ J c~ > N ' ~ U ~ N U ~ ~ U O N O (A H C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, i C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , Y .c Q C D • m ~~ ~ ~,_ ~o ~ ~ ~ : m ~ ~ ~ ~ Y('3~ w ~ ~ Q ~ _ T by 3 NNR B~ ~Cd d N~. G YC W PG.~aiM ~T/ NG _ '•o V i~?,k d > Ny N QON wg a Ld b~Pyd M b r_ u E d tiW .0 p 0 d N >Hti>.d Ud>d>7 dd ~ ~ " d ~ a >N X d d 0 bdNO H U M 1+v H H y p N~L, Gy N V Uq O uop'NO a~ a aw ; y 0 " c~ . c> "o d A N oi ~ OicC c .~iu y w W Q ~ 7 C~ p ~ .. . NNN G 3 i ~ N ° ~ Z ti d m~ q N q aG W 7 ~N H OUa !~ ] N . W 4 , N ut H « o ~ yp H Adp Gdd u a'~ y ti NN L T dF ti >. N O G :w~ d NE ad d'%~ j '~ .- d L N .~ d N Y d d A .~ C~ >~ N O U ~ 2 i° ~ 9 a R 6 U A y y 3 U p Y ~ K d d N 4~NYC~ ao ~ O N m N T _:_ iL G 0 7 d T a + ~C C N ~ '" wiooN OTN.N do iEmao a owdo du aaoe r. dw ua .. ~ op ud off D ' >.N~ wm OYO % Ng1+~d ~U d ~ otipc umom r,dc y H o oa. ~. u n'OE lL a .. ~ o oo "wT7m °v N ~ L N .. O dE G~O F~ ~ 9~ 0 N dF 0 LW 4 G wdC~. d a Y~ d N C d T~ fi d 0 L F W ~ Ff d 00E 6 '~ A a P N O d dG~ y U ~ 7 O O h d T F d o d ~ d N d d V7 N ~/ 4 S N N U a _ .N d N~ N/ ~~ N N d d H O d 'O N Q 'O a qa b t ti P ~Vw V P X TY M ~~ yL N 7 V U N .; V T N d ti E U - L y N N U ti O C N N d N = d GN.diCpb LdGtiU ~n d _ - W y L m c .~i vp d ~ A d 4 r m N ~y U ~ N 01 a ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ >~ ~ l0 H ~ ~ O ~ U • ~ C >~ C • •+ ~ 7 U 7 ~ T T ~ ~ • f/1 x ai oC ~ x a c 3 ~ a c J L v ~ ~ 3 _ rn 7 ~ L m O~ N ~ '~ 7 U ~ O ~ C ~ L N Y C T ~ ~ ~ ~'-' N m y N Z` `a c °. m ~ o °~ p3 ~ m rn o v Y ~ ~ ~ e L ~ m ~ - U c o ° i ~ m U ~ ~ ~ ~ Y m Y N ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ U ~ Y o 7 '~L ad3 ~ ~ ~ < 7 ~ 7 ~ d ~ U m x ~ cn E ~ N C ~ d ~ a Y t0 ~ ~ ~ C 7 O ~ O . .. ~ p U C x (j ~ ~ J J U N N ~ ~ Y M 'C ~ a c ~ rn U '~ ~ ~ ~ v c~~a o m ~ m w ii a a Q m ~ v _ x i w ~ ~ _ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. = v c Q O71 t ~ ~ t ~ N ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ` N i C i ~ Z Z. ~ Z. ~ C ~ O ~ m m ~ ~ ~ t«0 U t6 ~_ C ~ W a> ~ L C _ 'p> C uu > ~ - m m O ~ O C c0 O m > /0 J >` O ~ O U ~ U G O ~ O ~ E Y Q ~ m ~ ~ ~ O S ~ N ~ jJ O N N N Y - O O N O N 2 - z in o~ U x z m N J > w cn ac 3 ac U lL U ~ U C7 C7 ~ > » ~ z U U > ac a x ac c~ m ~. x x ~ ~ U w N m z O ~ 7 $ W U Z ` E ~ ~ : ° C ~ g' ~ ~ m ~ ~ I W U ~ ~ Z' ~ _. ~ , Y _ C1 m ~ N ~ X ~ I '~i U d C _ U ~ ~ C ~ L ~ _ N ~ ~ F m ~ m C Cf Y l0 t0 L C ~ •~ Y ~ ~ C C C m ~ , ~ ~ C li m. Q ~ L ~ m m > ~ z J x m ~ U O .E m Y L_ ~ vi L L ~ ~ ~ U ~ 2 N p j io L ~ C m O m Q C ~ d p ~ L p E ~ E ~ O C m ~J ~ E ( j d F .- ~ ~ t0 tti c0 ~ ~ o p m U U ~ . U ~ G> LL QQ C~ t6 O 2 --~ t~ Y J ~ ~ O_ ~ ~ ~ , ~+- ~ fA cn F- F- F- ~ ; Q O Q m m m a~ L_ ~ ~ ~ ~ C 1 ~ ts~7 N ~ 1 0~ = O ~ O 1 (~ ~ ~ (A ~ i~~c`° ~ ~=~~~~c4 n~~c$~~a .c ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ d'm ~= c~ >>.~~> .. ~~o~ .~~;~E~ c c p c ~ c c c C ~ i ~ ~ ~ E cti O J ~ Rf ~ fA=Q oYdLL j ~ C ~ J ~ N ~YL :~ .r o ~ .._.... ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ 2 E ~ 2.c,`~ ~L.~?~~ ~ C O ~ C Q f~ N Z ~ O lJ C ~~~ ~oc~a ~ a~a~Y$ o N JUii :~~ ~~ 0 ~~ m ~; I~ Z W W 'Q d ~.. VJ I- z w U 0 ~- z w z 0 z a, v, ~ c c ~ ~ c Q Q ~ .a .Q •Q ~ Q °, °- > ~ U U cn ~ ~ ~ ~ _ °~ ~ c o o ~ ~ ~ ~ O N O (0-J Cd O N i ~Y ~Y f.. O U c o ~ Q-U Y ~ ~~ ~cu ~~ N } Lv a d C7 ~ ~ ?' ~'- ~ oC _ _ ~ h O N C _C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ - Y o .~ ~~ 0O °o °o ~~~ ~~t> w~ cep ~ ~ ~ ° ~ 60 ~ ~ ~ C ~. c o m J o 2 2 ~ 3 ~ c ~ ~ a~ o o ~ OC _ _ , ~ ~>~ r M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~U>= O ~ ~ c~ c~ ~ M~ ~ V O ~ ~ -~ °p ~ ~o o~p O N o ~, o U O ~ E E E~ N~°o ~-~ ~° ND ~,0 No l.L ~ U c~ cd ca Q p O ~~ ~ ~ ~ N -p ~ "O ~ ~ ao ao ao ii - Y m ~ ~, > > ~ ~ .~ ~, ' atS ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; cn ~ cn cC cn _ _ c = ~ ~ >~~ ~ o 0 0 0 Q i i x ~~ ~ V O O O C_A i L O O~ O +~+ Y O Q = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ = U O ~ ~ V Q _ O ~_ J~ c o c v ~~ v° c~~ o c U .~ ~OCU ~ mac v ~~~° ~U > o = a° ~~ °c/~2~ ~mcnc~ c ~ ~ ~ c ~ ° ~ m °~ -o>- c~ c ~ cn Y ~ ~ ~ cA U ~ ~ ~ U t ~ = N ~ a~ o ~ ~ c ~ ~ Y ~ c c Y c -p . _? x _o - ~ a~ v ~..c~ ~ cn v ~ .c ~ a ~ -~ w -' ~ ~ ~ .J O > c~ - cu ~ cd Q ctl O ~ O ~ ~ (/) Y ~ ~+ ? ~ j p y ~ _ ~ "O c "~ -~ "~ > "° - ~ U ~ U (0 O J ~ ~ O J O . B Y O p O) p~ (n ~ Y ~ ~ Q= N ~ Q i +-' C LL ~= O ~ m L> O Q O~~ "-' i O O m C fn N ~~ (~ (~ = Y =_ (~ Y U Q ~ Y O O O O- ~~ ~ O YO i (n O p _ (n O~ i U= `~ •, a ~ aoU ~'E o ~ °-~ O 2 ~Y °c 2 ~'C ~ mcn ~ c.i ~.~ Y o o ~~~ ° c=o c > ~ ~ E Q=~ ~ w N~~ O EUw~ ~~ c ~~ o c.EZ o ~ > -_ ~ ~ ~~ ~>o ~>= ~~ ~ o a~ c~ ° ° c~ ~ ~.u~ o.E ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ 00 "~ NY zU cd>~~~Q~>(n>22(n~UU(n~O ~ ~LLU O (~ ~ cm ~~ ~ ~ ~'`~ Urn ~ ~ C7 ~ E U E E E E ~ E E E E E ~ ~~ QOp E ]Cj~ i pOCU~~ ~^o~ ~°- ca Ec~c~c~c~c~cdcd c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Eoo E , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~°. ~ X60°0 ~° °o o°o°oo°oooo °o °o °o o °o~ o^o `~ ~' O 1 c~ c~ °~ c~ c~ (~ ci3 ~. O O p ]~, O CV O C'7 00 OD 00 00 00 a0 00 GO o0 OD 00 00 .~ O ,_.. O ~O ~ ~ cnOOO'a Mv~r 3~`?T ~ ~ ~ O OT O>m ~ p O '~ O O O ~_ ~ C> O ~ -_ m ~~ O ~0 CO (n ~ C O O O LL - Y ~ ' N ~ - ~ O ~ Q O ~ ~c0 ~ ~ E °~ ° ~ E ~ ~ a`~i c ~ ° -~a u°i cYn ~ 30 ~ .N ~ a c°n c°n cn ~~ ~-~`- ~>°~~ c~QQ m mm cn mUO ~~ N rn me ~~°a~io ~ ~ ~ "~ oc ~ tN Eo°:g °m3cn° ~ ~~ ~ ~ oV ~~~ ~ ~ca ~ o °~c ~ m o > m~ N `~ v~~ ~•3~0' °Lo' aoi~ coo' N cE~ Q ~"~ c ~~ c °=:n 3; m~L >t ~ me c E ~c .~ ^^~ F--~I a~ a~ o ~~ ~ ~ a~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~, ~ .o ~ °zo ~~~, ~~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~,~~ ~o~~ '~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ ~ rn ~~ ~ ~ ~-+ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~.~ ~, o ~ ~~ ' ~~~ ~~~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 O O ,~ ~+ I O ~ ~ O ~~ ~'' ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ..x+~~ w:,., k '+ 'C L4 •K., 5.. ~t ~V ~ ~1 •44' :~ ~ ~\Wk~:C O O L U ~ O t O ~ O U _ (n N oLU~- ~ L L p ~ L 2 v ~ ~ L i O O 'c V o L v • ~ = ~ ~ ~ C = ~ C 0 0 0 O I L N ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )+ 7 +J ~ ~ ~ ~ N V U ~..~ . ~+ fSS ~ m 7 N Q O fA ~ (n ~ O _ O p O _ p O _ p O ~~~ O p~ O ~ = 7 (n (C (~CC~ L ~~ Q f~~ ~ ~~~=~U~ y .~ ~ m -g .~ 3 _ ~ ~ mg ~ E= c ~ 3 ~~ ~~Fo~ c :Q ~~~ O •~~ ~ g ~•~ d! m m ai ymg d Ecv, E Q ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ? 0 N C C ,Q ~ (A • ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ m ~ U ~~'$ p' a ~_!n c~ cS ~~~~~~ O K ~~ ~: ~g~g~g p >`~ N ~ ~ W d ~ a .o cs 1-- Q J r.. ~ ~ O Z V Z Z O Q ~_ O ~ v '~ a C7 ~ Z as ~ w ~ H= C7 ~ Z H O d d ~ J~ J ~ J C O_ _ Q F- ~ Q ~~ .~Q Y } } Q • ~ N Q cCIDM Z J J C Z pJp J o=m p Q O C! w ear ~>>a w o s L.L j ... d ..~ \ ~ C1~ ~ W N to z z w O ~ E o P' a ~ ~ C3 to °~ ~ ~ o 3 w ,.; F a Z 0 -~? ~, ~r ~ °tf Z Z m e o p m ~. ° X L!J U Q app ` omww °zU. W O d S ~ W¢ `t ° O ¢UFtq df CZa J O q ~ r ~„cc„J Q QQW W} . .l ¢¢z¢am y¢L ~ w °O m ~ ^ ~ G Q y¢J O~a wo '1 - i o y~s >ov~zZr= o a a 1- fA~ .~ ~ oa3°<- ~~ Q ° ° ~ Z NC7° T C >c~~¢ma >m°o °° > ~_ ` •p f/) N W OQ~dY- >zwQw ¢4oiLL UJ ~~ ¢>U ~v~ ~ ~2 ~ ~cj- ~i ~ ~m ~_ d C p~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 'v- 'c>. p ~ ~ C7 ~~ ao~U w _ ~ Qa`> g ~ m ~ ~.~ c ~ ~ E N ~~$ 32 c~ c~ N~ ~ v m 8~~•a c~ ~ «' ~ N =000 3 m~ v a~i ~ N > > 7 ~$g N Rf C ~ Q a'~ 3 U~~ (3 `~ cLi E~ 'p ~ >' U .C N ~ C '.A N m> >. omg.ms Ego U-,_~-~Em~c- ~~ ~ os $ c~ °'m m c ~C3 ~ m m x m `- ~ v1 N ~ ~ ~ C N m ~ U ~N V ~ ~ m ca m ~ m m °' ~ cn c "'a ~ '~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ N ~ m ~ c`o c~'3t ~ E vY ~~ ~+o ~ E ~ o °'~ ~ m o ~ ~'~>,~' °OQ aE ~ ~ m o c E E ~~. c c~ E ~ c m oo"~ o m tcn m•«U a~°OZ~E~~ v mmc Ex~o~~~--"E N A m 7 C .4 Z L m °' a ' ~ d d d tl o i ~ a ~ o v ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ `~ d ~ ~ ~ ?O 2 o N 3~ ~ o ~ m ~ a~ ~ ~ m~ °' ~, ~ `~ d ~ os ,~. G T M ..~ q) to N t 'p Y uj z z z m ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~N 00 Lf'' Z ~Q ~_ S c ~ C m~ m~~~ zzz> t g U m .~ $ ~~ . ~, ~:4Y ~ o a~ p NNE C ink uvi ~_ ~ ~;~~ ~,~ 2~~g ~,pYcy ~-~~ ~ O c0 ~ ~ C U Q a c~ 0 cC } N gc$ Q s ~ ? ~ c ~°~~ c E a~ ~ = 4U c'"a 'c o ~g U °tS otf o~S otS N ~ ~~ »r c N ~ ~ u ~'r~~~ c . . ~, () E ( ~ ~ O ~ fA M y N~ C d p ~ _ C H ~ p~C~C7U' ~~ ''''tea Q 7~F- D C _ ~ s °' L ~ ~ N ~ C } N°=~o~ ~ L N L ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~= O m ~, C C ,r ~ U ~ ~ c°~ .4 'pi 3 Q.~~ «S QE>~ N ~ ~- ~u:~U O v, rn s~~~ a"~`~uvim~ acv ~~ i,,$iU~a. = ca °c m -- 52 as ~ z$~ r~~ st _~ ~^ ~ O L rVN ~' 'd ~ ~ •C =O= -N N ~' O -~j ~ `~ C p 'O L a = ~>Q E ccU L g' ~ c~ ~~ .S~LL ~.QN~ E m s `~LLL O ~~ ~ c cLi c _ ~ a~ O ~-~piv ~ 3_~ v_~ m ~ ~ ca `- EU~ `Ern o ~ Q v; ca ~~~ a~ $ .4 -a ~~C9= m~ ~$s ac~ ~~~ 4 O vim ~~ c m p~N ~ ~~s~~~ ~'~ E Em c""o m o '~~ ~~ ~ 4'm °'~OC N m E~ cc v~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~Zc m.comYQT~~'• Yc~E ~ ~ ~ C y Of to c~ 'Q ~ C ~ EN ~ J Q N ~ c`~ 4? cc ~ v>c~ ~ ~ t ~ E~ ~~~ C V ~ O Q ~ ` > o ~ ~ cC W ~ t~ O N ~N 'o.,E ~~ N~ >,3 ~ ~cA cr3~ .cU %3 N ~~3 ~ t ~~ 4 ~ ~ 0~= ~ ~.0 4 ~JZ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Urri ~ ~ c m= d c~ a~~•c3Q ~ m'~p~U i N y~ U O~ V `~ m N p N~ ~ C~ C~ i~~~~QN o o~v0~ cgQ y~ ca r Y~~~~ o ~~ Na' L ~ m C q.'r ~~~m= ~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~ J > U~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ cts m ~` 00 ~ s U ~ ~ Z. c ~_ _ ~ Z`~ O ~ N p •m .7 m ~ ~ ocn~waQ ~n d ~n ~ N 'o .. ~~~~~s~~ ~' ~ ~L '~ fn N m LL ~ c~ ~ ,~ .V C m„roEc~3~ :oc~ ~no~yNCc ~~ ~U a`~a EY z~ of p~ tn~ >m c~v,cc~,~ c ~zs :~ ~N`~ ~~83~~ .. O ~ C~ V KO'd c ~ E~~~ m cc°~ ~8a~~~8. x (pj4c~cc`~o~o O -~~- C~ m C O O ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.Q s > > > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ E U«s«s«s«s«so~f«s«s •Q Nc~; ~ vi .. ~COt1')M~COtn(hr' ~. ~ y ~ N ~rr~~~~~ m ~~ `~ s N N N N m o ~ ~' L (~ a C ~ ~ ~ C V~. ~ ~ ~ (b L ~ ~ •(y L ~ Ncmm oC~ E.n S ~.y~~ co •~•~ (7 °C O N m ~ cti C m~~ ~ ~c .. m~ ~~ ~ 7 $~ ~ mss °~~ m m. E~mo 4.v mi ~ O min ~,~ U '~ o• Q ~ Uu' o o , p~~ ~ ,~ ~c,U~ ~ C ~C ~ ~ i Z i ~ csa ~U ~' Q ~ ~ ~d =~`~~ ~ c ~ ~d~~ > ~ °' = ~ :~ °' ~ ~ a _ _ m~ ~ U o m~ccn~- d c 4 Q ~ > 4 o t Z g > ~ ~ 'Q ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ C 7 .. v ~;: a«s ~ a ~~ o~ =~ Q °~ o ~ c O~ gl E ~~~ E~~ Q Octi~~~U ~ .Y ~ g'~' " ~ c __ C :0 ~ C C C ~ Q ~ ~QSS 3 O ~~~ p t ~ U m cd 'c~ 'c~ Z ~Cl F- N W Q W (7 N a N N r~~ ~' O N '~ 4~ O O C b4 ~ ih~ v, ~. ~ ~ ~a _~ O ~ ~ '~ cCi „ c~ ' ~ ~ O ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ • ^+ .~ •~ ~ ~ 4~ ~~.+ •V O ~ ~ ~~ ~U ~~~ °. -~ o ~~ ~-~~c~.~ ~~ ~~ .~~~ s~, ~ ~ Q 4~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ O ~ ~~~ ~U~ o 4~ ~ O V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n y a~ ~ o a ~' W ~ ~ a~ 0 ~N ~~ O G~ O ~~ ~_ ~Y .~ N g~ ~= L Nt ~ EY N~ t~Q ~~ ~ -p ~ Q ~ (~ ~ ~ •Q ~ ~ ~ pN~ ~ .C Y Cam: ~ O O_ ~ ~ ~ >` ~ ~ C ~ C_ L ~!j ~ V1 ~V-~ co c~ ~ioV~~N Y c ~;%. O«+ oo =~ c0 yrn ~ a~ ' ~ ~ O ChM ~ N ,~+ C ~ CO .~ C J E f~5z9~933 -'~l ~ ~ (~ (~ ~ rL.. (~ .Q r.+ ~ w CC C w 6~3 7 O 7 ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L C~ j ~ ~ ~ T QC ~ > C ~ ~ a C CU U ~ O UJ ~ ~, ^ ~1 O O~ V e~S ~. -«•.. ~~ R'~ --1 ~" ~ a~ U ~ ~ >~ ~ U ~ ~ w ~, a _ ~~3 ~~ oa~~""o ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ a3 o a3 0 ~ ~~ ~~ O o O~ U O~ t~,, U U ~ U "0 ~ ~ ~ cC ~ O ~a.~~ U'~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ o~ o ~.~ a~ ~ ~ }, O a~ +. • .~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ C[ 3 ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o O ~.~ O U '~ ~ U ~ ~ +-' x G~ .~ a~ O U b 0 0 ~. U o ~ O U w ~ O U a A 0 0 +a' w ~ 0 o~ U y 0~ ~a ~Q 0 N o •~ ~~ j o N ~ x N 0 0 ~ ~ ~ m 0 a~°~ ~ ~~aG I N/q 2 ~ 6 ,i r, y0~ 3 4 y m o v o N m = v, Um~m~ a.. ~ ,«+ ~ L -o C ~ L ~ o,~y m m ~ mU N o ~ c~ o y ~ m c E m co c E om,vr`~ ~~;mo.o E '~ m .~ aY~~ ~ dii > = a~ ' E r c o ~ c~ act m m~~ ~m o ~ a °cn ~ w m m :o~ ~ cN~o~; ca~ v ~ Q ~ ~mm co ~ m m ~ ~ N v~~ ~ 3 v ~ ~ ~ N -° .~a~ b 'd' o?S •~ v o .~ 00 -b° v ~, ~ ~'~a'7 ~ r-~--~ O ~ _U ~ _ V .n~--l r! ~ ~ n r ~ ~ ~ -_ ~ Q. ~ ~c F- rn i °~ '~ ~ o E cn c ~ c •• c cn c > ~ ~ c U _ v ~ ~ ~ ~ o U ~ Q. 3 0 -p L U O O L~ C O O~.~ ~ N~ O >+ U O ~~ ~ C U) ° ~ ~ O ojs ~ F-- _ 'O O ~ N E ~ O • ° O C E ~ 'L O ~ ~ -_ c N c ~°- ~ N -°o ~ m ~ ~ cu c~-~ ~ ~~UW2 0 °•~ ~ o ° >,a c~a~ 3-a a~0 ~Ls a~i ~~ ~ m~~iw 0m~m oQ `~ .v ° 0 0 0 0 0 0-> E 0 L O S c2~ c ° c c m ~~~ ~ ~°~ N _~ a x e ~ Q m o }, c o~ ~ m ~-° ° ~oC~Y~ cZ a~w a~~ ~~ ~ c-aC7C7C'3 ~ oico 0 0 ~m >° x ayi >.~ ~ ~ o= ~'i N p~ N O p 0. C ?~ Z~ O LL O N N N _ C N' "d N .C C "d = '~ N~ ~ c~0c~u`~i~ccu~~ ~~oo~N•n`~i~-°cnc333c`~.:a~cuoQa~~ ° c° ~ a?~ Q Q o 0 o co ~S o n o ~- ~S ~ p cu 0 0 0 mQmU J~~> ammmUW WtL2-JJJJ~~Zn-m (n~~} (j~~W W W J. a'~~~'°0:ao~0 E °~U~` ~~~= 000 .i ~~° o ~ E E EY o ~ coma= c~~ Z i m •~ m~ ~' (~ C A J ~ Q. m L~~ O J L iQ ~ O N (~ N gym-? OEo~Q~ -°c~m~ ° a.> o N 5 E o ~_ ~ UQm ~ ~~ _vi c fl- ~~ ~ uQi c~ N~ m~~ to : N : :~" ~ ~(~N C C1 C~ (~ O Q'~ t0-~ C ~ O~ ~ 0 C '- C ~ ~- O c~ N~ ~ O O~ O LL i d ;a~ o ~ ~~_ aci :ii~~~a' = m°,OCcn ~~ ~Uo>,Loc°.N ~ ~~ m ~ ~ ~ E E ~.NY>.~.~`- ~ c c o o m ,a ~.5~ me acn °- °~~ c° n. c~~ E E cc~ma>~cn m;~°°>.>. ~~ cE-oc~o-0 >' "~~ 0 0 0 .3 .3 ~ m~ o 0 0 m L o cu o •-. •~ L~ o 0 0 o L o ~..- cncn cn cncn cn cn ~-~-~»~~ a~zUUC~ a~ c~UO=YOCCnaa in~ ~•-- N p) C O~ O O U N= ~ "i 0 0 ~0 O~ +_ =' ~ U~ O O Q. O~ E 3 N .N C (~ N~ c~~ coffin c'c°'a ~~ ~,~~.~ o.N ~ ~ c ° E ~ap~ ~? ~ v c~ E ~ of ~Qwa 0-~ (~ N 0 c 0U•c~J ~~cAOC~cAm 0 ~~~ v2~ J °U e~~ H ccn cu-w ~ c ~-o c~ E cm C7 cn Q.o~ c- 0 0pC 0- o~ m cn .--m c coo Co3 c ~'" e ° y c rnc~ ~ ~ o E>,m o'~soo~ ~ oOC~C7 ~'~"c c~ ~C'3 ° o ~a~ a~ ~~ °~ 0 >°, o o °~ m•~~~-'•~ i 2m '~ ai°0Y E~mQ ~w E ~ ~ cw ~ m O N o c ~ E o f F- o~ ~ Y os°3~3 0 ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ Y _ ° ~ L L E~U~cn o ~NO -~ ~ :moo o ~~- •~ ~ °Q ~~~ ~ :;:~ E 3 vi U cn .., c ~ Q. a~ o ~ cn cn - a- ~ ~ .~,•r ~ a~ O ° >. o c ~ ~ c U ~ c .o : 0 ctS .:: ocuOOa-a t~~~._ ~0 ocui~°c cn. ~-0 0 ~.. o}, c0 0 ~~ Uccc~m 'C~oE 0~ Y•3mE`~•~ °c "=c ~ -~~ v~ °oo ~ ~:<~ 0•rno?0> o°~.-o ~° c~°~-°>. cn0 oc~ o °cu c~ ~> voi'O> N c (nQQm mo~0 [~mUUUU ALL ('32 2 ~Y J~ ~a m c CNrnwc~ Cmv m~ g cY~ ai~g ~ g~~ ~ 8 ~ o-'8v o~'~ 8 oa ~.N~ m ~ n ~ ~ ~ E `~'c opJ vim ~ ~~$' ~' UQC Wm ~ ~QY~ .x.52 ~ ~ c ui 3 co . ~ - Q - L C a, 7 ~ 'p ^ ~ `~ to ~" •C ~U G .Q ~ ~ N ~ ~ •C o m 0 ° ~.4 ~ ~~~~ c~~ ~ ._ AYH U ~ t .~M~NY ~ ~-,~ c ~ g ~ y ~ ~ : ' w ca D t 00 g LL LL ~ .3 "' ~ o rn -~ a ~~ ` c am cca 3 m m~ M 'cc~. .S2 mo~~ rn C N ~ m m ` n Q ~ m E ~ 1~ ~ N~ N C ~~ ' 7 ...d~~N ~ 3~U-~ i~~c°sc`~i ~ gTg~+yy. ~ ;~~ ~~ ~ ~; ~r C~ C f~ ~~~ m C C>•~ ~~8 J ~ -- u ~ ~~ ~Y N~ N ~~ ~a ~ ~ v:~r cv H L og m ~ Y ~ c c 7 .L-• ~ O ~ L ea c " N 4 w E ~~ ~ i~ ~ ~ X N 'tA C `a ~~o .. a E E'Y ~ 3 ~~U ~ E B~gUo~J° ~ ~~ ~ ~L ca3 a~ v o '; m ca ~°•~ J J C O Y ~~ ~ ~ O~ j c ... L'7 ~ C r ~ ~ ~ ~ (n fN4 c""O ° N . _ 3 a> > W 52~ c~4~ ~ N ~• :~ 4cscm c~~g~U~ ~~m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V :Z~~ cNV ~ ~Q ~ C EU c ,c °'~ E o ~ Y ~ ~ ~~' acv ~~ av c ~ ;'4 ~ `n E ~rnui c m N L cC ~00~N C `S~ Ucro~~~ m~~3 ~ ~~ g,3 = -~p~ ~ m m~ ~r~ ~ ~ os~ -~ C .4 .4 •~ •~ ~ m g. ~ ~ ~ m ~ L o-~,~~~ ~>ww ~, m~a° m ~ C fA 'Q S2 4 c~ `QQ ~_ ~~'~ 3 ~ LQ S _v ~ c m N~ L g ~~ N Sct r C U ~ C'C c c °~- cc t :t v a~ »- m ~ o~ °' o so3 wry ~ a~ c~ :~ Warr~s~ 4 c ~ '~ mad ~ ~~ ,~ ~m `~'; LLL ~ v ~ N UvUC O°N 'd N N RS Q QOj ~ y 7 C_ C C t ~' rn~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Qom. r~ c u, o o < c~'>`'O ~ ~ ~ 033 m ~ U v _ o m 'd ~ C v~ s •C ,~ a ~ ~ O ~ Q C E c~ N ~ ~ ~ 'G) ~ "~ C ~~C c Z c~ y ~'C L L N ~ N L r ~ ~ 7 C~ T i p t a = ~ ~' i L_ 4 E Lc~rn ~ ~ c~~ t4 ~ c~U~ O p~ a Up -p c ~ V U c c~~C (n ~ Y y U ~ C p~ ~ ~ ~ to t4 ~ ~ '~ y ~ aID m ~ ~ ~ ~ tY~ C 4 ~C ~ " ~, ~ ~ O V tj~~ L Q CI ~ ~ w E m E ~ ~ m m N °' ~ z m~' c`h' ~ c° ~~i rn Erm c ~ ~ ~ ~ o o m c, ~ ccv m o `°_~ •~ g >, L (~ V ~L o ~; Q c< E o ~ .$ ~~= o ~o~ ~ U a p~ °' `-$:°~Q~ Vim; :p .~ Q U~ Q ~~n~ns Noaliead es. ~~d~ ~~~anc S~~Sil~l~nad dNd JIlINf1WW0~ `S~I~N~1S1~ ~If10 d0 Sa~~N ~Hl Ol SS~N~/~ISNOdS~~ ~II~Hl ~lOd dd`d1S a~l`d~la~a ~f10 - S1N~W1S~nNl ~II~Hl ~Od S~I~SIl~l~nad ~1f10 - ~ ~ N N _ ~ ~.E ~O•~ -O"~ ~ ~ N c~ O _ N ° U .1 `U ~~m ~ j ~ ~ ~ •i ?~ L O •E E ~ N O E C E -O ~ E o- ~; o °J ~ ° ~ _ . "' em ~' ~ ~ ~ -~ E N ~ Z N Q. ~ ~ +. c~c ~ ~ (~ +' C o ° a> > > t m c°'i ~ `o m o a~ (~ ~ +--~ Q Q ''_'' X C C N (~ C ~+ E N °- t `n t ~° H E? ~ 3 E t~ ^ 0 U O uj ~ p ~ O -~ O7 ~ (~ E i +-' O O ~ ~ ~ v j yL.. ~ ~ ~ ~ o °° 'J ~ o °-°' c V~ O i O Q.- i O O L +r C O-o~~~ `a~o~ui-o-o~3wo ~~a~~ ~ (~ ~ N~~ N cn L~~ (OA O7 O 4 Q +r p O O v o ~ a> o O~ n m rn ~ c O 0 y m _ Q +r ~ (n r. E N V ° C N C C ~ E O i }' ~ ~ v ~ ~ o c C ° ~ `oT a~ .`-' ~ -° c c° °°- 7 ~ ,C ~+'- ~ -a +.. (~ C '+-~ +~ O ~ N O O N o O <n a~ p -° -o in c ~ ° m a~ 0 0 ~ (~ -O _~ ~ ~ •~ ~ O N (~ ~ ~ O) ~ U O ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ U v ~ U m ro t ~ o ° ~ E ~ v Q- ~ ~ N cA ~_ U N ~ N U >' ~_ ~ ~ N O ~ ~ N ~~ v o ~i°n E ao c ~ >,~Q c ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ c~ ~ O cn N~ t O E~ H~ ~~ ~ ~ c~ c c o ~ ~ a ~ o vi ~ ~ t ui ~ ~ vj Q ~ ° ~ ~ cd o o ~ ~ aci ai .~ ~ Q m a~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ }'' ~ c o E ~ -•c~v ~~ o~ °o >,° v`~i-a ° ~ o~~ ~ ~ ~~ o °'~ ~= E ~ 3 0 ~ c~ cn O ~ o~•- E c c~ ~ ~~a~~ a~~ v ~~ c °~~ o~~ ~ ~ 0 3 c~Y c ~~ ~ ° ~ ° aci ~_ E E~~•E a~ c.a' a,N o a~ o ~•o c ~ ~ o-° ~,~ ~~ E E c ° E~ ~ ro o a,•• ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ a~ O~ c m~ ~ °c ai~ E o ° ° c a~ ~ a~.~ ~ o o L ~ o u~ ~ ~~O ~ a~-a c ~~ °'o m o ° Qv~c m E}' ~~ >.,_. ~?'_~ c~ c~cU~ v cc}n~ y 'O Q U C O~ O~ O O O~ O~ ~~~ O O~~° C U~ U~~ C C U°~~ N E E •O •O U~ n .~ ~ U "O ~ •- ~ ~ E U U O ~- ~ O "O "_ O ° ~'' ~ O •c cn N ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ "a U ~ c~ >, "6 O O O U U C~~ C O O U O U O C~ '-' >, C RS U 0 0~ N y >, Q ~ cOa > > •~ ~ C ~ Q ~ ~ ~ +r U (cS ~ ~ :_-~ cn O O Q O O N ~ N C ~ - "- 't N ` O N O O O- c~ O O ccS O ~ ~ ~ O ~ v°i p~ = ~ }' O ~ +r~ O_ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ N N ~ O N C ~ E ~ ~ E~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ o ~•c~'~ ro c~i o~ o'er c ~ °•~ ~ o~ ~Y~ o E ° ~~ v ~•c~ o 0 a,~~ c'~'.Q ~ 3U o ~ aim E c c°'°'~~~"> ° c~i~-°~ n~ ~ ~ 7~ c ~ c~ c ° >'E+. E ~ c E o ~ ~a~•-~ a~ °'- cn0 ~ ro ~~°. Q-oco°UUO-°~ ° o ago 0 _y 'C O ~ +-' ~ Y ~ ~ ~ N ~ N O U 1 ~ Q. N ~ O ~ ~ O N U .O ~ }, .O C Q ~ ~ ; ~ N ~ ~ ~ - O O ~ ''_' ~ c~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ "O ~ O E O ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ O N c Q ~ ~ ~ 0 ~' O ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ c~ v- (~ O C C - O C R O O O +- (~ U ~ ~ Q (~ += C N O~ C ~ C C p~ Y Y ~ .. rr ~ ~ i 3 ~ •fn ~g~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ _ ~~3~~ Q O ~~~ ~~~ 2 o m~ ~LJ~~ Cflln~2m m~~ L a~m.Ym `~ c~a~~o ~ .C N C ~ ~ ~ rte.. ~ > ~ Q y a1 L '~~' ~ N ~ ~, ~ >, L W ~ ~ N ~ m N ~ E ~ •- C c «s ca ~ o, cn ~ ~ cc n. •> cc C7 :p~ o ,cam ~ Z.~ :4 Z' cc ~ a~v-~ m ~ ~ c~vo~~ ~~ m~ c° ,~ =- ~ pica ~ Y ~ O ~~ L ~ gg fig, •N~~ ~~ ~~ o~~ C d t ~ ~ O .a ~ ~ N V g~ ~~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ a~ U ~ 2 .mac 2t C ~~ ~ viW s ~ 3~.. ~ ~o Q m r d1 ~ ~ cC ~ LLm~ CO~MMOI 'ffl.Tt1 6 fl M f S VIR~InIfl VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. PRESENTING SPONSORS Mobil NalionsBank PREMIER SPONSORS WYYD Radio GOLD MEDAL SPONSORS Contel Cellular Domino's Pizza ® d Holiday Inn, Tanglewoo Kroger Roanoke Times & World News , Stop In Food Stores CITGO SILVER MEDAL SPONSORS Carillon Gentry, Locke, Rakes, & Moore Maid Bess BRONZE MEDAL SPONSORS Appalachian Power Blue Ridge Outdoors A Chas, Lunsford Sons & Assoc. RHH of Va., inc. LAMAR Outdoor Advertising Roanoke Fruit & Produce Roanoke Electric Steel August 23,1994 Dear Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, 305 First Street, S.W., Suite 412 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 343-0987 FAX (703) 343-7407 just a short note to say thank you for your ongoing support and commitment to Virginia Amateur Sports and the Commonwealth Games of Virginia. Due to your efforts and others like you, this year's Games were once again very successful. Enclosed is a report on the economic impact the Games had on the Roanoke Valley, the State of Virginia, and the other cities which hosted an event. The report also provides information on the growth of the Games and the demographics of where the athletes travelled from to participate. Again please accept my thank you for enhancing our ability to carry on the Tradition of Excellence, the Commonwealth Games of Virginia. Sincerely, ~~r~~~~ Peter R. Lampman President •~ SPONSOR OF ~~-_ °~_ 1~~ ~._% ~ ._~ ~: ~ ..-~ .. M n0~~ ~P ,~ VI R G~- ,+.,,..n-.~ PROMOTING SPORTS IN THE OLYMPIC IDEAL Sanctioned by the United States Congress of State Games and recognized by the United States Olympic Committee ~J Recycled Paper #111 141A ~1 ws I~ 111114 4111 4w A ~'~~=; = CITY OF ROANOKE ~- -- OFFICE OF THE MAYOR x 45. .. ,a% Is en,,,<n A.e„~e,sw.,RM,m Z Roanuke. Virginia 24011~ISY4 ~~' TGerhanc: l]Qi) 98I-39J4 p AVIU +. ROWRRS G REF.TINGS Welcome to Roanoke, Virginia, the "Star City of the South"! We are proud to host the 1994 Commonwealth fames of Virginia, and we are delighted that you have chosen to spend duly 74 - 18, 1994, with us. While in Roanoke, there aro numerous sights to see and places to visit. The Blue Ridge Parkway, with Mebry's Milt to the south and the Peeks of Otter Ln the north, ssible Crom Mill Mountain where our star ie located. Wtdle visiting the star and panoramic ore view of the Roanoke Valley, you might take lime to tour the Mill Mountuln Zoo. rAlso of interest locally is Dixie Caverns IocateU south of the City on Interstate 81, and Natural Rridge which is located north on Interstate 81. Cenlar in the Square ie ust while yoi~ a a visiting in downtown Roanoke. Thu Art Museum oC Western Virg nia, Roano:-.e Valley History Musewn, Mill Mountain Theatre, the Science Museum of Western Virginia, end llopkins Planetarium ere all housed in Center in the Square. Nu tour of the downtown area would be uwmplete without a visit to the historic fa _ s' Markat where you will find scores of local farmers- displaying their wares. Num shops and res taurauts help to make downtown Roanoke a place you will not Want toumiss. Please take time Lo visit the only African American Museum west of Richmond, the Harrison Museum of ACrlcan American Culntre, and the Virginia Museum of Transportation where yml will Cind the largest displays of steam locomotives and railroad equipment in the country. We pledge to do everything within o r po r to make yuu stay i our midst a ssful and enjoyable exper .. ult is r' desire that you wd] return [o your espective communities with fond memories oC what you experienced in the beautiful and progressive City of Roanoke, Virginin. Sincerely, ~Dav~~ Mayor Dear Athletes, Fans and Friends of the Games: On behalf of the National Congress of State Games, I am pleased to welcome you to the 1994 Commonwealth Games of Virginia. Today, forty-four states are conducting or organizing Olympic style sports festivals known as State Games. These Games attract over 500,000 Americans of diverse backgrounds, ages, and skill levels. The participants take part in over one hundred and twenty five ditFeren[ sports from Archery to Wrestling. Sport is not the only activity, many State Games are playing prominent roles in education, dmg awareness, scholarships, sports medicine, coaching clinics and much more. The Commonwealth Games thrive because of the dedication of volmneers, staff, sponsors and athletes. Thanks to all who participate and support these Games in Virginia. You have all prepared to compete to the best of your ability, so enjoy the competition in [he spirit of [he Games. Sincerely: ~~ Tom Osborne Executive Director s ~.~?. `1'w' +x AN - 1CZaux~#g of ~o~txtaCxe P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE INISTRATOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 240180]98 BO OOF SUPERVISORS ()0e) ~T2 2Wbe Eowaao G. Dear Athletes: On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and staff, it r a genuine pleasure to welcome you to the Roanoke Valley for the 5th Annual Commonwealth Games of Virginia. Virginia Amateur Sports, the local governments, area businesses, and n volunteers have worked hard to prepare for this yeaz's games me1We sbelieve that their efforts will result in excellent competition and >.n a pleasant and rewarding experience for you. We hope you will take time to enjoy so of the any attractions of this a addition to the sportsme ants. A vrisit to the Appalachian Tra il,nDixie Caverns, the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Explore Park or numerous other unique places will be time well spent. We are delighted that you are oming, and want to do erything possible to make your stay cwith u stimulating and enjoyable. We hope you like the Roanoke Valley so well that you will want to return, soon and often. Good luck in the Games! Sincerely, -~`-E~, ~i~" Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ®q,~Ya,e eaa, CITY Oh' SAI.~Yia L7 R(~INIA May 23, 1994 Dear Participants: The City of Salem is happy to have this opportunity to welcome each of you to the Roanoke Valley for the Fifth Annual Commonwealth Games of Virginia. Being the Mayor of an independent, sports-minded government, I would like to say that our locality is proud to have such talented athletes compete at our facilities. With the abilities and ambitions that you possess, we know that we will be witnessing the best of tournaments. On behalf of Council and the entire City of Salem, I would like to wish you the best of luck for a victorious weekend and hope that you will enjoy our local hospitality. Sincerely, (\ ~CT~7Y OF SALEM / /a/Ja/mes E. Taliaferr6/ Mayor JET:kac 82394 - 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ,~' - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TAE"ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Surplus Property Policy. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend continuation of the in-house method current/y being used. BACKGROUND: Several months ago, the Board of Supervisors directed staff to review the current surplus property procedures and examine possible alternatives to bring back to the Board for discussion and approval. The staff currently handles disposal of surplus real estate under procedures adopted in 1985 (Attachment Item A). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached are several alternative methods for the disposal of surplus property. These options have been reviewed by the County Administrator, the County Attorney and Economic Development staff. Staff is in agreement that modifications to the present policy are needed, but that major amendments are unnecessary. In 1989, the County Attorney developed a proposed resolution to bring County procedures in conformity with the Roanoke County Charter. The proposed resolution is attached (Item B). Staff recommends that minor changes be made to the current policy including streamlining of the rejection procedures and minimum value bids on small parcels. Attachment Item C is a list of Roanoke County's current surplus property. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Hold public auctions. 2. Utilize private professional services such as realtors. 3. Continue In-house staff representation operating under established procedures adopted by the Board of Supervisors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative three, that the Board of Supervisors adopt procedures for the sale of surplus real estate by County staff . F.espectfully submitted, ,/ T/;,,~ ~' 1~` l Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Appro~~d by, ~ _ Elmer C. Hodges County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Nickens to approve alternative #3. Staff to bring back official policy. VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson X Kohinke X Minnix X Nickens X cc: File John Willey Paul Mahoney ITEM B M E M O R A N D U M ~--J TO: Elmer Hodge,r:Donnie Myers, .John Chambliss, John Hubbard, Tim Gubala, Tommy .Fuqua, Diane Hyatt, Reta Busher, Anne Marie Fedder, John Willey FROM: Paul Mahoney SUBJECT: Procedure for sale or disposal of surplus real estate DATE: 1 August 1989 Attached please find a draft resolution amending and adopting a procedure for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate. Please review this draft and give me your comments and suggestions. Thank you. Attachment I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, RESOLUTION AMENDING AND ADOPTING A PROCEDURE FOR THE SALE OR DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 85-156 adopted September 10, 1985, is hereby rescinded. 2. That the following procedure is hereby established for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate: A. Surplus County real estate shall be identified and reviewed for possible sale or disposition. Surplus property shall be made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale in accordance with Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter. This property should be appraised to determine fair market value. This information should be kept current as necessary. B. At least annually, advertise in a newspaper of general circulation in the Roanoke Valley the list of surplus real estate available for sale, or provide such other form of public notice, including the posting of this list or the publication of this list in the County newsletter, at the discretion of the County Administrator. C. The County Assessor shall be responsible for showing and coordinating the data that is provided to potential bidders for this surplus property. Copies of the maps, the appraised value, and other pertinent data shall be on file in this office. ~~ D. Upon receipt of an offer to purchase surplus real estate, this offer shall be evaluated by the County Administrator, County Attorney, Assistant County Administrator for and the County Assessor. The evaluation of offers and any staff recommendation shall be reported to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in executive or closed session, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 A 3 to determine the Board's position on the offer or offers. E. If the Board of Supervisors is agreeable to allowing the recommended offer to proceed, a first reading of an ordinance proposing a sale of surplus real estate shall be placed on the agenda at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. This first reading shall constitute notice that a bona fide offer has been received and that other written offers may be submitted to the County Administrator until 5 p.m. the Friday preceding the next Board of Supervisors meeting when the receipt of offers will be closed. F. At the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors after the first reading of the proposed ordinance, the Board may adopt the ordinance upon a second reading and accept the best offer received or it may reject all offers. Any acceptance of an offer shall be by ordinance and shall authorize the County Administrator and County Attorney to take such action necessary to complete the transaction. G. No public disclosure of the identity of the offeror nor of the terms and conditions of the offer shall be made until the second reading of the proposed ordinance. J-/ 3. This procedure shall become effective from and after the passage of this resolution. ~-/ d zz~zz zz~. w U ].a 55 ~ u~ ~..~ i--i A W oooo°o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 Cn O~ M Q~ O O~ .-+ O~ W n ~ ~ ~ ap .-~ M °` M ~ V9 N d H w a a a O U O ° ° °o °o ° ° °o °o o ° ° °o ° ° ° °o ~ ~ O ~O ~°. ~ ~ O eh p°p p N ^ ~ ~ N O O ~..' N M ~ M r.. ~ N ~ ~ N N ~ r• ~ •--~ C7 z o xx~xxxdx xxx xx~~xxxxxx~~~xx~ Q Q Q~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q dl --I r-I ~ i-d M ~: --I i-i --1 ~-1 -~ i--i i-d i-d -a N r-I N N r-I •~• r-I ~ ~ O ~1 a N A ll 1~1 a ~w ~~ ~ ~ pw aO v~ l ~~ ~~~~ ~~'~"~"~" ~" h QJ ~ L QJ QJ C! L Ol GJ v v~~~ v v v v~ v~ a aW H~~l ~ 1~1 h h h V1 h p1 Vl Vl V1 fA h h V1 fA V1 Vl N h h (A H V1 (A fA V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MWM ~ 11WI O M ~O N ~ N~ M~~ M 00 ~D O O~ T M M M ~~ '„~ N r. N N ~ .-+ .~-~ N ~--~ N N M r' ~' N N E r" N M N N N M N ~A M N r+ d' N 1~ ~O N p M r+ M M M~~~ `'^ `'~ pp M N M N r+ M N ~+y T ~O N ~O .~-~ ~O ~ O d' ~D .-+ .-r M N ~-+ N M N N N O~ N O~ O ~A O~ .-r O d 0 .--i .-+ O ~' O O ~-+ O ~ ~+ O O .~ .--i ~." ~." ~"' "" '" '..' O r' r' N O O .-i N N OHO pip p^p ~ N ~ N ~A ^ V O~0 OO 00 00 00 00 N M M M M M 00 (~ N N 00 N M ~ y. ~ i.+ ~ ; C'r y a a O s. y u ~ ~ a~ N N (n a N ~, ,.,,~ M ~ v~ YOi z W ~ ~ ~ u o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o o ~ >,~, ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0.~a ~ ~ ~x o A dddr~~r~UVVUUxxxx~~-~~zzzzza.E+33~3 N ~ ~ a A ~ °o 0 0 0 W °,°~°oo Cn ,~.i M ~ N Cn M e-~ r b9 z~ of ~~~~ N N ~ dl N~~~ A a v ~ w ~~ w h V1 O O a aW d~ a z; ~,; x w as 1~ N .--i M ~-'~ .--i N ~O .-~ M N N ~O ~ ~ ~ ~G -+ O O O O . n ~ ~ d0 1~ 00 M ~O ~O 00 z .-. a. ,~ N ~`-i sue, ~" x sue. ~ w~~~w V ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ H ACTION NO. 82394 - 3 ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of Recommended Changes in Utility Billing Procedures ('OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend appro va/ of the changes proposed in the staff report which wi// rep/ace co/%ction of deposits with charges for service. /prefer to retain deposits a/ready co/%cted and return them when property owners discontinue service. /f you choose to refund them instead, there is /ess of an impact on the budget to credit each account on their bi//ing cyc% beginning January, 1995. /f the proposal is acceptab/e to the Board, it wi// be p/aced on the next agenda for first reading. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors directed staff to explore changes to the Utility Billing procedures. A team was formed to review current procedures and suggest changes. The following is a summary of suggestions for the Board's review. In addition, we have included a table with proposed changes, current policies, Roanoke City's policies for comparison purposes and, a draft ordinance. Initial Service Fee: The team recommends an initial fee of $25.00 when service is started for residential and commercial accounts. Currently, there is no charge for starting service. An initial service fee is to cover costs associated with starting a customer's account. If a customer moves within the County an initial fee would be charged each time service is started at a new address. Deposits: For residential customers, no deposit would be charged when service is started. A deposit would be charged to restore service after being disconnected for non-payment of an account balance. A second deposit would be charged to restore service the second time a customer is disconnected for non-payment. No additional deposits would be imposed after a second deposit is collected. Deposits for residential customers would be the amount of the customer's most recent quarterly bill. This deposit policy would be uncomplicated and a policy easily explainable to the customers. It would link the deposits with the customer's usage. It would eliminate the possible inequity of requiring a m:\finance\common\board\8-23 -94.wpd ~~~ larger deposit for a customer that has traditionally used a smaller amount. In addition, it would not require a large amount of staff time to do manual calculations if averages were used. Commercial customers would not pay an initial deposit when service is started. Deposit amounts to restore service after disconnection for commercial accounts would remain the same as they are now. These deposits are based on a table and the amount varies according to the size of the water line to the location. The team recommends capping the number of deposits for commercial accounts. As with residential customers whose deposits are capped to reflect a potential bill worth six months of service, the team felt a cap that reflects the same time period should be used. Reconnection deposits would be applied to the final bill of the customers when service within the County is stopped. Refunding of Deposits: The team does not recommend refunding currently held deposits. Prior customers never paid an initial service fee. New customers will be charged an initial service fee but not a deposit. As the policy stands now, those prior customers that have deposits with Roanoke County will receive a credit against their final bills when service is discontinued. The team felt it would be more equitable to prior and future customers to leave the prior customers under the old policy. The County has approximately $300,000 in deposits. If this were refunded, there would be the costs of refunding, loss of interest income used to offset rates, loss of cash used to reduce short term borrowing, and possible bond covenant consequences relating to maintaining a certain level of cash balances. Disconnection and Reconnection Fees: Customers that have service disconnected for nonpayment will be required to pay a fee of $20.00 to cover the cost to the County for disconnecting service. If the customer is reconnected to the system, an additional fee of $20.00 will be charged to cover the cost of a second trip to the location. These charges will be applicable each time a customer is disconnected and/or reconnected to the water and sewer system. This policy change would address some concerns regarding customers paying the cost of actual disconnections and reconnections. The reconnection fee would not be charged if a customer does not reconnect to the system. FISCAL IMPACT: Additional fee revenue is estimated to be $37,000 per fiscal year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend proceeding with public hearing and reading of ordinance. First reading of the ordinance would be September 13, 1994, and the second reading on September 27, 1994. m:\finance\common\board\8-23-94.wpd .~-a Respectfully submitted, }"~-r ~- Paul E Grice Assistant Director of Finance Appr ~ by, f Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Nickens No Yes Abs Denied () to approve pro- Eddy _ X - Received posed policy () Johnson X - - - Referred () for 1st and 2nd Kohinke x - - To O reading Minnix - X - Nickens - x - cc: File Paul Grice Diane Hyatt Paul Mahoney m:\finance\common\boazd\8-23-94.wpd L~L 'r V/ a LIJ 0 Q W W Ll. ~_ J_ H L~L r U Z Q 0 W a a W Z 0 ~_ a U Q w Y ~ • ~ a~ .-. Z Q i L,, ~ •~ ~ U ~ .L-+ L ~/ N 7 .0 ~ E C C ~ 'O p - .r C L C O ~ ~ o fn y_ j O ~ O (O a °~ ~ ~ ~ O c m~~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ m O ,~~ ~ oo o o~ N ~ ~ O ~ fC L O O ~ O ~ N~ ~ i~ C c0 cn +, O c 0 Q >-. 0 7 N ~ O O • U N _ ~ ~ ~ V O ~ ~ 6 9 ~ 0 -C ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ N~~oo~ =' ~° ~a~ioo c~ O o ~ ~L ~ V O U ~ ~.,_, >~ O cn ~ W ~ U p ~ -p A N N O N ~ O O ~ D ~ "- fl > . J ~ ~} ~ d 3 N ~ i (~ C LQ) C ~ caE ~ O U ~~~~ w O O) N O >+ O ...~ ~ O U o~ ~ ° a ~ o a~i i s J ~ L ~ fB V O O E •`- N O N U O C O O ~ ~ C O > y O C E O Q ~-p~ O p L C ~ O ~~ ~ V a. L W ~ ~ N 69 69 U Q ~ C O ~ ~ ~ C UO O (a fn ~ c Z ~ ° ~ ~ 'N ~ - C C 3 Z a ~ o O ~-~ o- No m c ~ fl. ~ -a a o~ ~ oN ~~ ` ~ Q~ N ~ ~ ~ r •/~ ~/ ~ L L J ~ ~ ~~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ Z O O O C O to O O ~ d O ~ O~ O' U O E ~~ U O ~ 0 O ~ H O dg N p d4 " L O~ O E9 ~ a ~ C d C • ~ U =' = N O ` W O O '•' c ~ O L N B 69 0 0 C ti~ d4 0 U 0 ' ~ Q~ m 0 ~ L ` C i O C D~ O ~ 3 U ~_. ~ •U ~ ~ N ~ _ U C V O O C _ ~ E C C O ~ _ C O m W O ~ U d (n N fn ~ U C U ~ ~ a~i = = ~ o c ~ m^ ~ ~ ~ E Q _ U •~ O O Q Q N j 0 Z ~ fl' 7 U ~ ~ Cp ~ O p ~ U N N N >' Ca C L C~ N N~~-.~ N~~..U _O _ (6 _ fa (0 N ~ N OU O (B N Q. ~ v ~ C :_.. C C ~ J N N DLL Q'LL~ a.~ ~0 ~~ PROPOSED REVISIONS TO WATER ORDINANCE Chapter 22 WATER Article II. Water Systems Division 2. County Water System ed. Meter accuracy test $25.00 (No charge if meter fails accuracy test) Special request to discontinue or turn-on service for other than non-payment $10.00 ~-a 'Connect ion ''. e~?y~?-t Se wer only ...................... $ 5't1 0(3 5~ 8" Gnnnecton '7.5.04 3/ 4" Connection ..................... _..... ~`5 0~3 1" Connectionn ..... ..... 1,(30.0{7 1 1./2" Connection> ....................... 1~'Q • 00. 2" Connection _._.. _..... 240.OC3 3" Connection ........................... __ 3t30.OQ 4" Connection ....................... _. 4C3O.OQ '6" connection ............................. _....._. 5fl'0 Obi 2 b .,, (4) The deposits required by subsections (c)(1) and will be credited to the cu~to~ter~..e `f~.na1 bxl:lx.ng G©unty of Roanoke rya, without interest; w sixty (60) days of final discontinuance of service balance, a,f an,y, wa.~.l k~e ~~~uxided t4 '~.h~ u~:~t~°ci~~ c) (2 3 .~ - a (Code 1971, § 20.1-27; Ord. No. 84-108, § 1, 6-26-84; Ord. No. 62486-147, §§ 1, 2, 6-24-86; Ord. No. 81286-169, § 1, 8-12-86; Ord. No. 121686-259, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 101387-5, 10-13-87; Ord. No. 62591-7, § 1, 6-25-91; Ord. No. 52593-9, § 1, 5-25-93) Cross reference(s)--Schedule of charges for wastewater disposal, § 18-168; adjust to utility charges for filling of swimming pool, § 18-168(d). Sec. 22-83. Inspection and reading of meters; bills; refunds. The director shall cause to be inspected and read at least once every three (3) months all meters metering wa~er supplied to consumers. The director shall have the authority to estimate usage ;::.... if he determines that a meter reading cannot be obtained. a~i service r bills shall be paid at the utility b~lling office or at such other places designated by the director. A11 a:~~:tiaa~'. service fee~~ advance payments for water, refunds to depositors of advance payments, or other refunds on account of errors shall be made at the utility billing office. Bills shall be due and payable rio later than the la~~ flay Qf the ''' mpnt~ >;~u:a:~c ,. } ~vh !ch '-~ ~- ~. --~-ez } h ~ ~....~, e~e~a-rr~;, -~~Q~= the b i is mailed. (Code 1971, § 20.1-28) Sec. 22-86.1 Unpaid bills. which his nbt been ~aaid by the die date .C....'1 ~ .... -...,,~ Yaymen (Code 1971, § 20.1-31) 4 ~~ sec. 22-88. Connector's responsibility when moving from premises. When the connector using water intends to move., he shall give the director at least three (3) days' notice Any person vacating any premises without paying his ut~.lity 's'ervile =,~ bill shall not have utl~;~~ ~ service initiated ca]^ eQntz~u:ee~ at any new premises until the amount so due from him shall have been paid. (Code 1971, § 20.1-33) 5 Action No. 82394 - Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funds from the Economic Development Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approve/. We agreed to extend utr7ities and pay connection fees. This request is for additional funds to cover actual costs beyond the estimate provided earliar. ERECUTIVE SIIMMARY: In January 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA) entered into an agreement with Hanover Direct to extend utilities to their project as well as to pay for the necessary public utility hook- ups. The costs for extending the water line and necessary hook-ups were projected to be $23.0,000 and Hanover's investment was to be $12,000,000. Costs are now estimated to be $260,000 and Hanover's investment will be $13,500,000. The additional $30,000 from the County is available within the economic development fund. BACKGROUND: Hanover Direct agreed to invest $12,000,000 in a 450,000 square foot facility on Hollins Road if the County extended the water line to their project and pay necessary public sector hook-up fees. The costs of these incentives were originally projected to be $230,000. The costs are more accurately estimated to be $260,000. Hanover, on the other hand, is building a 530,000 square foot facility and its investment will be $13,500,000. The additional $30,000 needed to meet the County's obligations would be recouped in slightly less than two years. FISCAL IMPACT: The requested funds are available in the economic development fund 102230 5850. Annual projected tax revenue from Hanover's additional $1,500,000 investment is $15,950. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transfer $30,000 from the economic development fund 102320-5850 to the Hanover Project fund (104080-8921) for the purpose of paying for the water line extension and necessary hook-ups. t' ~-3 Respec ully submitted: Brian T. can, Assistant Director, Economic Development Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abstain Approved ( ) Motion by: Johnson to Eddy X Denied ( ) a prove $30,000 from Johnson X Received ( ) Economic Development Kohinke X Referred Fund Minnix X to Nickens X cc: File Tim Gubala ACTION # 82394 - 5 ITEM NUMBER ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for additional funding for Bushdale Road Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~K~~ EXECUTIVE SiJNIlKARY Request for the appropriation of $10,000 to cover additional expenses encumbered as apart of the Bushdale Road Project. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In December of 1989, Bushdale Road a rural addition project was appropriated $15, 000 from the General Fund Balance by the Board of Supervisors. The appropriation was established to cover County's expenses (right-of-way acquisitions and relocation of utilities) for the upgrade of Bushdale Road to the Virginia Department of Highways Secondary Road Standards. Now that the construction is completed and Bushdale Road (State Route 953) is the responsibility of the Virginia Department of Transportation, Roanoke County is obligated to cover additional expenses which were either unforeseen or exceeded previous estimates. Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to appropriate $10,000 to cover the following expenditures: 1. Relocation of Utility Poles: a) County estimated and paid ------ $ 5,000.00 b) APCO cost ---------------------- 511,600.00 Difference ------ $ 6,600.00 ~-y The difference was due to the placement of additional poles required by APCO because of safety concerns. 2. Relocate a well at an approximate cost of $3,200.00. Mr. Maynard R. and Dorothy P. Owen's well were initially shown outside the proposed right-of-way. It was not found until the actual field stake-out (construction phase) that a portion of the well head was located within the new right-of-way. Staff feels, because the existing well is shallow and very close to the roadway, that a new well should be located elsewhere on the property. FISCAL IMPACT• The funds appropriated for this project have been exhausted. Staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors appropriate an additional $10,000 from the Board Contingency Fund to cover the outstanding items previously discussed. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Appropriate $10,000 to cover the APCO bill and well relocation from the Board Contingency Fund. 2. Appropriate $6,6000 from the Board Contingency Fund to cover the APCO bill and come back to the Board for an appropriation once the well has been relocated. 3. Appropriate $6,6000 to cover APCO's bill and leave the responsibility of relocation of the well to the property owner. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of alternative #l. Arnold Covey, Dir of Engineering & for spections Supervisors adopt APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 2 ~-y ------------- ------------------------- ACTION ------------ --- VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Nickens to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) approve funding of Eddy X Received ( ) $10,000 from Board Johnson X Referred Contingency Fund Kohinke X To Minnix X Nickens X cc: File Arnold Covey Diane Hyatt Brent Robertson 3 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for September 13, 1994 Board Worksession; Roanoke River Corridor Overlay District and Advisory Board :~ ~ r r ~ c2 y COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: '' i ~1 BACKGROUND' Since the late 1980's Roanoke County has actively participated in a multi-jurisdictional planning effort that has focused on issues related to the Roanoke River. All of the jurisdictions along the river from its headwaters in Montgomery County to Smith Mountain Lake have participated in this process. This planning process has resulted in a series of recommendations, two of which are the adoption of a Roanoke River Overlay District, and the establishment of a Roanoke River Advisory Board. The Commission has recently completed its review of a proposed Roanoke River Overlay District, and will be forwarding it to you for your review and action. The purpose of this worksession is to update and inform the Board on the results of this planning process, and to advise the Board on the key components of the Roanoke River Overlay District. The staff will also present and discuss the creation of a Roanoke River Advisory Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1 Schedule a September 13, Roanoke River Planning Advisory Board. 1994 worksession to discuss the Process, Corridor Overlay and -~ 2 Respectfully Submitted, -~ ,.Gi~>° Terrance L. Harri ton, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, c.~.~`^~ Elmer C. Hodge ' County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~? ~_~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for September 27. 1994. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance to rezone .409 acre from AV conditional to C-2 to allow retail uses, located at 5449 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kingery Bros. Associates. (2) An ordinance to rezone approximately ten acres from R-3 conditional to C-1 to construct an office complex, located at the intersection of Airport Road and Dent Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corp. (3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct and operate an electric substation, located on Kirk Lane, off Cotton Hill Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Applachian Power Co. (4) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a building for religious assembly including classrooms, office and recreational facilities, located on Northridge Lane approximately 700 feet northwest of Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of North Valley Seventh-day Adventist Church. ~' 7 MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for September 27, 1994. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 4, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, C Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW _ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24010 (703) 772-2068 FAX 1703) 772-2030 For staff use only `~ date re ~iv~~ received by: i `,J ~ applic tionrfeer. r / ~ BZBZ date: _ ' 'lS %/_ evt place ds issue BOS date: Case umber: ~ /~~ r / Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE [VARIANCE Applicant's name: KINGERY BROS. ASSOCIATES C~~~ ,,c Phone: 774-9463 ~d '"~s Zip Code: Address: 54 6 9 FRANKLIN RD . SW ~ d~ w ~%~-' ROANOKE VA ~+-w K u 2 4 0 1 4 Owner's name: KINGERY BROS. ASSOCIATES Phone: 774-9463 Address: 5 4 6 9 FRANKLIN RD . SW ~ Zip Code: 24014 ROANOKE, VA Location of property: 5449 FRANKLIN RD Tax Map Number: 98.02 -2 -9 ROANOKE, VA 2401 agisterial District: CAVE .SPRING Community Planning Area: CLEAR BROOK Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AVc~ (AV WITH CONDITIONS ) .049 acres Existing Land Use: sq.ft. COM)vIERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTY Proposed Zoning: C-2 pr 1'~L~Cast G~,ry«~a.~ L'ax.~ ~v~cs For StaffUsoOn/y Proposed Land Use: Use Type: COMMERCIAL RETAIL PROPERTY Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO ~ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ NO Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ~ ::: nce of Section(s) O - - 3 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Varia Q fL~~(.cCC -t y'11~~~r'-Gc+ ~D ~ ~.v-,e~ ~dv-~- ~ G~Cr~j -~j D~/~ 4c~`~s, Is the application ccrtmplete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan ~ ~ Application fee Application ~C ~::>.: Metes and bounds description f :. ... Proffers, if applicable Justification h ~`'~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners !hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the gwner's agent or contract purchaser and am actinD wish the know/edge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: `'~ .~~ ~i~% ~>~~~ ~~l JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST SECTION A THE PROPERTY THAT REZONING IS BEING REQUESTED FOR WAS LEASED BY A SMALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND SERVICE BUSINESS. DUE TO THIS PROPERTIES CURRENT ZONING WE ARE UNABLE TO LEASE THIS PROPERTY. WE ARE REQUESTING A REZONING SO THAT WE MAY PURSUE VIABLE BUSINESS WHICH WILL LEASE OUR PROPERTY AND ENHANCE THE CLEAR BROOK CO1~~IlVItTNITY PLANNING AREA. SECTION B: WE FEEL OUR REQUEST OF C-2 ZONING ON 5449 FRANKLIN RD, WILL CONFORM WITH THE ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE ADJOURNING PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY C-2 ZONING. THIS PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS A DECELERATION RAMP FOR TRAFFIC LEAVING ROUTE 220. SECTION C: SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1. TOPOGRAPHY: PARCEL IS SPLIT BY AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY (LOCALLY KNOWN AS NARROWS CREEK) TO BACK CREEK. FRONT SECTION IS FLAT; BACK SECTION SLOPES STEEPLY UPWARDS TOWARD THE SOUTHWEST. GROUND COVER: FROM THE BACK LINE OF THE BUILDING FORWARD TO THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IS PAVED. BEHIND THE BUILDING IS DIRT, GRASS, AND WEEDS. SURROUNDING LAND: PARCEL IS BORDERED ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE BY A B-2 USE, ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE BY AN M-1 USE (AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR) ANT TO THE REAR BY R-E. DIRECTLY ACROSS ROUTE 220 IS AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL USE AND RESIDENTIAL USES. NEIGHBORING AREA: GENERAL AREA IS COMMERCIALLY DEVELOPED WITH ADJOINING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SITE LAYOUT: NO CHANGE TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. ~~~ <r~x ~` ~9 ~ ~~ ~~ LAND OWNERS INIMEDIATELY ADJOINING PROPERTY TO BE REZONED: s- /6~. ve 7 ~y'•.~.Ip~~) ~L IN % ~ ~ a ' ~ C.... 904 .wf(R b7!(prclw[ •^ ~r 679 f"O0R •'.[n[+. re 1 6 ~i ~ a AT ~. qtr J ~ ~ooo ..4~, aC i G. .~ ~ 1~ ~ u T4 ~ Oa. .ISee ~ r ...,~ .~t.'~ e C ce s e ~. ~l . . ,la:. ~ o P+.rea tl n t a l n r Hayst^ c ~- If 00 M O • soo ~ M; ~ EST HT$_ ~ ~ ;3 G s \ ~.fal0 , M' JC6 2 2~ t ~%+~ 0 .raw 1 ROANOKE - --- ------- ~ S ~'L:;`~~a n ,VICINITY MAP G -/ Q NORTN _ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANIVIA'G ~,ETIr~D,~I~R.' ~/~Ili~~~/ B1?DS. hSSOC/ATFS AND ZONING 7'-aJ~C M/~ P : ~' 98.0 9 z- ~- .. .,, ~~?v~sT: ~EZovF IoM A~~ ~ CZ oR AV _~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only da r "c~e~ ~ !/' 7`'' received b~'L~,/! appticati e• CBZA date~'j p"~acai s~ u dam'.' BOS date: Case Number: ~~ ~. Check type of application filed (check all that apply): C;~ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Friendship i:•Ianor Apt. Village Corp. Address: 327 Hershberger Road Roanoke, Virginia Phone: 265-2100 Zip Code: 24012 Owner's name: Address: SAME ~ Phone: Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: portion of 27.17-4-13 Corner Airport & Dent Roads Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning Area: No r th County - Ho 11 in Size of parcel (s): Apx. 1Q acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R3C Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Zoning: C -1 Proposed Land Use: Office Complex ........................... For Staff Use On/y Use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. . If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO X Variance of Section(s) N/A of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application .,, Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification ~"` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge, and cons nt of the owner. Owner's Signature: ---~/~,~ : '/~ .~'~ ~~~~~ ~r - fo~ S[ah` Use Only: Case Number Applicant Fri Pnclshin Mannr ApartmPnr `Ti,l 11 a----aQ°~r~~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The purposes of C-1 zoning are to facilitate C-1 type uses along major streets where existing commercial development has occurred, or near exis- ~ ting residential development where C-1 uses would serve as a logical buf- fer strip between conflicting land uses. The site addressed in this appli- cation lies between a small, but developed residential neighborhood known as Burlington Heights and the Roanoke Regional Airport. This residential area and the adjacent airport are conflicting uses and the use of the land for residential purposes would intensify that conflict. The commercial use of the property would achieve the buffer area function suggested by the zoning code. Section 30-3 identifies a number of general purposes of the zoning code. The approval of this rezoning, and the subsequent development as envisioned would put this property on the Roanoke County tax rolls, whereas it is now exempt, and encourage economic development, two specified Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ... . . The site exists within the "Development" category of generalized future land use. The Development area exists within the urbanizing part of the county where public infrastructure is now available. While Development areas are principally envisioned for residential development, the proposed site's location immediately adjacent to the airport and major roads sug- gests that commercial office use may be preferable to residential uses. This plus proximity to the Transition areas identified along Peters Creek and Airport Roads, and the existing commercial development located in this area .establish some compatibility. Existing residential areas north of the site can be protected by use of landscaping-and/or privacy fencing as re- quired by the zoning code. Office uses are deemed to be moderately compat- ible in urban areas with Development designations by the Comprehensive Plan. Because the proposed use is for less intensive office uses that Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The site will be graded to accommodate the proposed use, and vacant land will be converted to office use. The development will place additional demands on fire/rescue and water/sewer services. No impacts to roads, schools and parks are anticipated. The development, via payment of develop ment fees and real estate taxes will impact county finances, thereby con- 'tributing to the repayment of the enormous debt incurred by the County to further develop its water and sewer services. Adjoining properties to the north, and to a lesser extent to the east will be visually impacted by virtue of converting the vacant land to office uses. This impact can be mitigated by employi:~g the buffer yard requirements of the zoning code. For SraH Use Only: Case Number Applicant Friend~h .i Mannr Apartment Vi 1 1 agP ('nrI The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 'Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as we!I as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. (purposes identified in Section 30-3. Otherwise the proposal is not incon- sistent with the remainder of Section 30-3. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. highly developed office/commercial parks, e.g. Valley Pointe, a higher level of local compatibility can be demonstrated. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~-z Isx3 ~~~~ \\~J!/ S37VdS Q3ddtl710MM 9 ' ~ \ ' 3 OYDI~ S3:ridS SCMa1Ntl1S YLI '91::x2Nd .Oti~.l I j \ NV~IJ ' ,~\` \ t \ osol ~ `\ \':~ \ ~~ \ `~~~ ~ ~ '~ ~ i ~ \ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~\ ~\ `~ ~\ \\ ~ ,,. \ ~ / DS01 ~ ~ ~ ._ ~~ 1 ~ --J ,~' scot: ~3 a~ ~rttaitne n~+ ` ,\ ..,\ r ~ ~ ~ NOIlIQQtl 1 ~ina3s ~ i 3afllfli ~ L~~~-' ', ~ ~. .~r~t~a~r .- ,. ~. . ,. \ ~ --- = ~6 -„ 1 _-- ... ~ `_. ti -- ~~=~ ~ ~ NO[l~ I~~ ~ / ~~~~ % ~~ / /,, ' ~, ~, /~ /. \/~~. I / X01 ~~' 1S%7 D601' , ~' ~ /. I /.. ~ /. ~~. I /' t ~ ~ 9NIxatl~ 1SX3 0801 / ,' __ ~> I .i J /~--~- oat i .--~ i ~' ~ ocot r f _ ~` /l ------- (- / ~1~ r,~1~9 t~ I , ~ ~ ~a~°"S371d5 Sl ~TT_ f~ ~ W 1 / 6 _~_ <~ ~(Vl Dl DI I •/ N ..J. . ~~ _ ~ C -~ ~_ _~ ,, `~ ..Q ~ -_J ~ /' i / . r~iy_~; y._- ..._ '~ r'\~/n0 p~5--' _- ~AS/r/~ St d!(~ ~r~jO~....~! ~ ?~c ~•', ~.\ ?° / ; .fS~ `~r,~.,,,,4~ ~vnG+tA '~.. ~'1~C ~rJ'p~'•gv`•i4f\ ~. 4 'o9``y ~1AN05 ~: ~t,e ~ *4S7i 0"_ ~r.,. ~:~<»»•...,:~c~ ~^ ~(~~~Si11VNYE Y~Og .I SS .,. ~ ,: +.. ' ,; y=d'P~y~ ~C\~ cis ~",, lF 190 /~ `a "'rn 2E,r~r71 P~Yr%~o~` ~-~~r ~ (,. , ~ ~ ows.uw i0cudas ~~~ '•.ocrr ~r~ G~ ~/,T,/w'~ j0 \ ~ ~r rr .. r fa ~..K:. Y"n•.r .y ~ / .Z, S Ua.PTAINS~~ \c~i•r iC~(i7~ ~~' 1 ' , ~ ~'~ ~~VICINITY MAP ~ ;~s`,`°U l$ ate. ~~~( D NORTH \ ~ a \ 6 \ `~ nt ~ \ \ \ \ \ `~ ~ '\ \\ \ \ \ al '' ,`\ \ \ \ \ \ / ,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~_ ~~ ~ : \ \ t \ \ ~ ~\ \ \ sm.. \ \ / \\ \ \\ \ ~ s \ \ ~~~ / ~ O a. ~.. \ ~\ \ _ ~ /~ ~ \ \ ~ ~~~ e \ \ • r' -~..~ / ~ \ 1 't- ~ ~ 1 \ a>.. ` / ~ • 4 ~~ / .~, - / '~ ~ ~~~ 9 ` ,~ \ ~' ~ ~ '~' '" ~3 _ ~ •.... ~ ~ I ~ + ~ ~ 1~ `O I '• ~~ ~ y` 1 '.` ` ..e as oa.~.i O ~ . as /'=.;. `*, °., "~`~_`' ~ CITY F ~ \~ ~l _ ,• ~~ DEPARZ'I~NT OF PLANNIA'G ~~T/r/ON~Q: ~'I~/~l~/D5f f/~ MAit/O~ i~PT. Y/GLADE ' AND ZONING ._ • ~F~QU~ST: ,~EZD~tI,~ IoM ~3 c ~'a G l ,,, -3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX 1703) 772-2030 For staff use only da r ceiv ~ received by: application fe ,l~ PC/BZA dat /„ ([J placards issued: BOS date: Case Number:~~/) _ ~ /f Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING CX7 SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: A~~n]a~h1~n aysr ompany Phone703-985-2472 Address: P. 0. Box 2021 Zip Code:24022-2121 Roanoke, VA Owner's name: Appalachian Power ompany o ert ary ~ es Phone:703-985-2472 Attn: R. A. Bays 5808 Ki rk Aa24 018. ~x~~ai~sx V Address: P. 0. Box 2021 Roanoke, Roanoke,VA 24022-2121 Under contract to purchase by Appalachian Location of property: Kirk Lane, off Tax Map Number: 9 •O1 - 3-2 96.01 - 3-2.1 Cotton Hill Road, (Va.Sec.Rt.688), off U. S. Route 221 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning Area: Back Creek Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AR 19.881 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family 866,016 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning:Agricultural/Residential Dist.-Spec.Use Permit Reque ........................... rSlaffUseOn/y .. Proposed Land Use: E1 ectri c Substation Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v X Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan ** Application fee X Application X ~~ ;. Metes and bounds description* Proffers, if applicable X Justification ~~+" Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with thekno /ed a an copse of the owner. Appa"~aC~1 an dPower ompany *See ~~~tact~ed ~eeds and Survey P1 at Owner's Signature~y: /Z..t.~.J.a~r /.~ Q . ~~cyC/ en um Right o ay upe~rvlsor ** Addendum H Foi Staff Use On/y: Case Number ~ `~ Applicant Appalachian Power Company The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the .purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. See Addendum A Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan for Roanoke County establishes this area as a Rural Village. It is realized that a major portion of residential development has been and continues to extend into this area. Appalachian's project will be constructed and operated as a compatible land use while providing necessary electric service to the area as it becomes increasingly residential in character. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. See Addendum B See Addendum C for Justification of the Proposed Site. ' Addendum A ~_~ Appalachian's request for a special use permit to construct and operate an electric substation is consistent with the purposes of Zoning Ordinance Section 30-3 and Section 30-34-1. Appalachian's project will facilitate providing electric service to any customer within the area including existing or future providers of police and fire protection, disaster evacuation, water, sewer, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational facilities, and any other provider of public requirements. The project will not create congestion in the public streets, but will provide necessary services to any public provider that would facilitate the reduction or prevention of congestion. Appalachian's facility will be constructed in such a manner that will be harmonious with the existing community yet able to provide the necessity of electric service to existing and future customers. As this area of Roanoke County continues to undergo development and become increasingly residential in nature, the proposed project will provide necessary electric service. As demonstrated in the attached concept plan, the substation has been designed by location and grading to have as little impact as possible on surrounding properties. Existing vegetation will be supplemented with additional landscaping to insure conformity with Sec. 30-92. Historic buildings or areas will not be encroached upon or destroyed by the proposed project. The one residence to be removed is an older frame farmhouse but it is not listed or designated as a historic building. No lands will be removed from existing agricultural uses and the wooded complexion of surplus Appalachian property, outside the construction limits, will remain. Neither surface nor ground water resources will be impacted by the proposed project. Addendum B .~.~ -J The construction of Appalachian's proposed station will require the removal of one dwelling, presently under contract to purchase by Appalachian. A second dwelling already purchased by Appalachian should remain intact and may be sold after site development. The attached concept plan shows the properties as impacted by grading. The project will create a favorable impact on the public, and public service providers, by increasing the ability of Appalachian to continue providing reliable electric service to the area. Grading, placement of facilities, existing vegetation and additional landscaping, if required to conform with Sec. 30-92, will screen adjoining properties and surrounding areas from any visual or noise impact. Addendum C ~`_~' Page 1 of 2 Justification for the Location of the Proposed Site The location of Appalachian's proposed substation is in the center of the area to be served by the station. It is the most desirable of fourteen (14) alternatives considered since it allows Appalachian to optimally improve its position in continuing to provide electric services to the area. Many alternatives were a significant distance from the center of the area to be served. They would require considerable lengths of distribution lines to serve customers, thus increasing the customers vulnerability to outages. Additional considerations are the costs of construction and maintenance of these distribution lines. In addition Appalachian needs a station site located near the supply source of the 138 kV line traversing the area. The proposed site became the most viable alternative when the 12.739 acre tract previously owned by Evelyn Kirk became available through the real estate market. Later Appalachian was able to secure a contract to purchase an adjoining tract of 7.142 acres presently owned by Robert and Mary Giles. These two properties provide an excellent location in the center of the load area. The site is traversed by the existing 138 kV transmission line which will not require the acquisition of additional right of way or the construction of additional transmission lines. Addendum C 22 Page 2 of 2 ~'~-J The size of the purchased or contracted tracts allows Appalachian to place the substation out of close proximity to existing residences. Station grading, existing and supplemental vegetative screening will create the optimum site that will not be obtrusive to the surrounding area, yet providing an opportunity for Appalachian to improve its ability to effectively serve the community. R ~ ~;., ~ *~~..~ F• ./ ~' [ ~ P~~ • YICIHITY MAP ~"~ •---- HORTH - DEPAR'IMFNr OF PLAD~Y~ Speciail Use Permit Request: AID ZO~TIlVG ~• Appalachian Power Company • • 'TX Map # 96.01-3-2, 2.1 ... , ... For staff use on/y ~- COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 dater i ceived by: applicaho ?Ci6ZA date: placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: lr.. Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: North Valley Seventh-day Adventist Church 8325 Brubaker Dr. Roanoke VA 24019 Address: c/o ~ Phone: 562-0406 Zip Code 90~ 5579 2-+019 Owner's name: EL C A Loan Fund Phone: (3 12)380-290 Address: 8765 W. Higgins Rd., Chicago Il 60631 Zip Code: 6063 ] Location of property: west blockfront of Tax Map Number: 37.14 1 1 Northridge Lane about 700 ft. N W of Peters Creek Road in Roanoke County V Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 4.347 acres Existing Land Use: vacant - sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: R-1 For StaN Use Only Proposed Land Use: Religious Assembly; construction of church building Use Type: with associated classroom, office and recreational facilities. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES yes NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES yes NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: (not applicable) Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application 1:;~;`: Metes and bounds description - :: Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~'~~.`,~,` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edged cp~sent,d~fj~Aowner. Owner's Signature: (~,~'~~~~~~~~ 7/~~Gl y2vZ ~~y For Stall Use On/y: Case Number .'.• Q1Vlf1fC:~~ SP: ~~~A~ €~S~f?~R~1`t f RFC :.....:........:...::.....:.........: .:.:.:.:: ~ ~'~f #~A T I..~3~ f ~D ~ t ~'~' .....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.....:..............:.:.:.:.:..............:::.:::::::::::::...... . Applicant North Valley Seventh-day Adventist Church The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The North Valley Seventh-day Adventist Church is a growing community church formed from the former Salem, Virginia church which has met for several years with the Memorial Ave. congregation. It is the desire of the church to re-establish itself in an adequate facility in a developing area of the north county. The building of this church will allow for the expansion of church services to the congregation and to the surrounding community. The proposed location will be well within the allowable lot coverage, should blend in an attractive and harmonious way with the sister churches on either side and have minimal impact on the neighbouring R-1 uses by preserving and enhancing the large, mature stand of oak trees on its NW corner, with appropriate additional buffer yard and landscape plantings. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County ,Comprehensive Plan. The church's proposed location falls on the fringe of established neighbourhoods in an area designated for urban development. The property has been rejected by several developers who attempted to subdivide it for single family residential dwellings. This location is ideal for church development as evidenced by two immediately adjoining churches. The proposed recreational development of the wooded open space will benefit the church and its neighbours. The community services offered will enhance the civic activities of the neighbourhood associations. Tt~e stron3commitment of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to public health and disaster relief and preparedness activities will be available locally. The architect has been asked to design an innovative clustering of classroom and office spaces with open areaways between the main halls. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed church facility will have a limited impact on the adjoining properties as the existing mature trees, proposed buffer yards and topographic elevations offer natural isolation. Impact to existing roadways will peak on Saturdays, while the school and neighbouring churches peak on the other days. Water and sewer demands are fluctual, but far less demanding than multiple residences. Noise to the adjoining houses should b~ minimal, buffered by the contours of the land and existing plantings. . _. .. . ~ NORTH VALLEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH - - - ~fJ `' ~ : ~ - ----~ - -C, E%Vl~e~~ ~~ ' f fiJ ~ I y ! i ~~ ~ _' ~~!'~2Y ~ I ~ ^~~i; horL~~ ~7,it~i_i~~'DU ~ . -~~ f i ~ I i ' i ' T I I _ I ~ .-_ -r------ T - = ~ I I j I• i I ; j I I I I ! --r- T `-•- i ~._ '_ ... - - - -.. .. ~ ----- ~ - I _ _ - , , __. ~~ I I ' I i 1 ! I_ __ I I I I I I ~ +. 6 i ,h •i ~ I I ~~ __ T_^--' ._- __'__.-.-'I i I---F~-• i I I `., I i ' ! i j I I r L~ r I I I ' - ~ - _ _ _ _- ~ _ -! I ! ! i ! + _ I ~ I i I I 1 I ~F,.3 ,ice I ! !.. i,;:" I ! rl.. ~ ~ ( _.. -_.. _.. . - __ _ I -_ ' ^I '- ~1j j I f I I I { I ~.: r I ! ! I '[-."~'" ' -.r~ - - ~ ----. ' ~ _- ,. ~ , ~ ~ ~~ _ j 'Yi1~ ~ ! i I I ( i '{ ! ii ! i6.. ! ,~ t i :., c' I --- --. ..._ . i I l l l f l f t I I I {~. I I{ I ',_-!+-,{^x ~ -1---=--~--__ ._ _. ' _ _I - I ~ -} - . .~ is e'-~ ~ I _ __ _ y,-._ t. __ _i~ -~._. ` I , -. i i ~~ , i 1 ` -l I _ ~ __-_ _ \ ~-_ _ _ ` -"-T - /• I , _ _ - \ . \ ~ \ t l I \ j I ~ ! -- --- - - \ - I I ! __ ~ . _;._ _ . . r `\\\\~ _ ! I i I I I - - __ _~_. t _..._._. t-._.. - .. I ~ __ ____.~ -.----.- ; -T- ~ t t f ~• , i { I i i I{! I I I I ! i I I i i! ? I I I ! i I I I 1 i~ ~~ t ~'- y 4 NORTH " DEPARZME.'N'T OF ~PLANNIly~ Special Use Permit ' - AND ZONIrPG North Valley Seventh-day • Tx Map # 37.14-1-1 Request: Adventist Church 1 ACTION NO. ITEM N0. `~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading on Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to Add Planned Commercial and Planned Industrial Districts. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: , v~N~ ~ `'r~c°-c~ ~~~ BACKGROUND• In April 1994, the Planning Commission approved a schedule for the development of various new zoning districts. Two of these districts, the Planned Commercial and Planned Industrial, are being proposed in order to provide the development community with more land development options. These two districts promote the efficient use of commercial and industrial land while also providing the land developer a high level of flexibility in combining land uses and densities. Both districts incorporate incentives to encourage the creation of aesthetically pleasing and functional planned developments. Draft ordinances were prepared and discussed at a Commission worksession on July 19. On August 2, following the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed zoning districts. Attached are copies of the Planned Commercial District and the Planned Industrial District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold the first reading on the proposed Planned Commercial District and Planned Industrial District on August 23 and schedule the second reading and Public Hearing for September 27. -~ Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. Harri ton, AICP Director of Plan ing and Zoning Approved, -~"-"' t'~-c/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~7 ARTICLE III DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-57 PCD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Sec. 30-57-1 Purpose (A) The intent of the Planned Commercial Development (PCD) district is to promote the efficient use of commercial land by allowing a range of land uses and densities and the flexible application of development controls. This can be accomplished while also protecting surrounding property, the natural features and scenic beauty of the land. The Planned Commercial Development district is provided in recognition that many commercial or office establishments seek to develop within unified areas, usually under single ownership or control. Because these concentrations of retail, service and office establishments are generally stable and offer unified internal arrangement and development, potentially detrimental design effects can be recognized and addressed during the review of the development. For these reasons, the following provisions for PCD allow greater development latitude. Districts should be proposed and planned for areas that provide for adequate development and expansion space, controlled access points, landscaped parking areas and public utilities. Development of the PCD will take place in general accordance with an approved Master Plan, which may allow for clustering of uses or densities in various areas of the site. Planned Commercial Development districts can be a visual asset to the community. Buildings within the district are to be architecturally similar in style and the relationship among individual establishments should be harmonious. The site should be well landscaped and parking and loading areas are to be screened. Sec. 30-57-2 Permitted IIses (A) All of the residential, civic, office and commercial use types listed in Article II of this ordinance are permitted in the PCD. Residential use types shall be limited to no more than 30% of the gross square footage of the other use types in the PCD. No use shall be permitted except in conformity with the uses specifically included in the final Master Plan approved pursuant to Section 30-57-6. Other permitted uses are listed below: 1 ~7 - 5 1. Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturing Recycling Centers and Stations Warehouse & Distribution ` 2. Miscellaneous Uses Broadcasting Tower Parking Facility Section 30-57-3 Site Development Regulations (A) Each Planned Commercial Development shall be subject to the following site development standards. 1. Minimum district size: 5 acres of contiguous land. 2. Minimum front setbacks: All structures proposed to front on existing public streets external to the PCD shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the existing public right-of-way. 3. Lots in the PCD district shall comply with the buffer yard requirements of Section 30-92-4 of this ordinance. 4. Lot coverage: a. More than one principal structure may be placed on a lot. b. Maximum lot coverage shall be determined through the preliminary development plan process but in no case shall exceed 75% 5. Public streets in the PCD district shall be built in accordance with VDOT and Roanoke County standards. In reviewing the PCD preliminary master plan, the Commission may recommend, and the Board may approve, one or more private streets within the proposed district. Private street standards, specifications and a proposed maintenance agreement shall be submitted with the preliminary Master Plan. 6. The applicant may propose a reduction to the number of parking spaces required by this ordinance for each use type, if justified. This proposal will be reviewed with consideration given to potential future uses of the site, parking demand and expansion potential. 7. Maximum height of structures: When adjoining property zoned Residential, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (side, rear, or buffer) adjoining a 2 ~° Residential district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds 45 feet. In all other locations the height i`s unlimited. 8. Utilities shall be placed underground. 9. Arrangement of areas: a. The location and arrangement of structures, parking, access drives, outdoor lighting, signs and other uses and developments within the PCD, in addition to achieving these development standards, shall be accomplished in accordance with an approved final Master Plan to assure compatibility with the existing and future land use in the vicinity. b. Areas designed for future expansion or not intended for immediate improvement or development shall be specified as reserve areas on the preliminary development plan. The future use and the limitations on future use of such area shall be specified, or else such areas shall not be included as part of the PCD application. Reserve areas included in the PCD shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat and orderly manner. Section 30-57-4 Site Development Recommendations (A) The Planned Commercial Development district should be designed and developed to be a visual asset to the community of Roanoke County. Since the relationship of the development to the community and the prospects for economic success of the project have much to do with the physical character of the development, these factors shall be considered in reviewing a Planned Commercial District application. For this reason the following site development recommendations are made. (1) The principal entrance into the PCD district should be sufficiently landscaped to comply with the purposes of this district. In addition, the first one-hundred linear feet of street, leading through this principal entrance into the PCD, should have a landscaped median of sufficient width and planting density to meet the purposes of this district. (2) Parking within the PCD should be located to the side or rear of the principal structures on the lot, wherever feasible. During review, consideration will be given to topographical constraints, innovative site design, buffering and landscaping factors. 3 Section 30-57-5 Relationship to Existing Development Regulations (A) All zoning regulations shall apply to the development of the PCD district, unless modified by the Board of Supervisors in the approval of the final Master Plan. Section 30-57-6 Application Process (A) The timeframes outlined in this Section are the maximum timeframes mandated by the Code of Virginia. Roanoke County will make every reasonable effort to complete the application process within a shorter timeframe. (B) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff shall meet to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process. The applicant is encouraged to submit information on the scope and nature of the proposal to allow staff to become familiar with the proposal in advance of this meeting. (C) Any application to rezone land to the PCD designation, shall constitute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section 30-14. The written and graphic information submitted by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. Once the Board of Supervisors has approved the final Master Plan, all accepted proffers shall constitute conditions pursuant to Section 30-15. (D) To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete a rezoning application packet. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary Master Plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information shall include: 1. A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot lines, and easements. 2. Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district. 3. A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PCD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any 4 ~-5 specific human-made and natural characteristics located on the site. 4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, historic resources, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, known archeological resources, etc. 5. The proposed conceptual location and number of structures within each land use of the proposed development. 6. The gross square footage for each use type proposed in the PCD. 7. The proposed size, location and use of other portions of the tract, including landscaping and parking. 8. A traffic circulation plan, including the location of access drives, parking and loading facilities, pedestrian walks and the relationship to existing and proposed external streets and traffic patterns. General information on the trip generation, ownership, maintenance and proposed construction standards for these facilities should be included. A Traffic Impact Analysis may be required by the Administrator. 9. If a reduction to the number of parking spaces is requested, a justification for this request shall be submitted. Based on adequate justification, the Commission may recommend, and the Board may approve such a reduction. 10. Reserved. 11. The proposed schedule of site development. At a minimum, the schedule should include an approximate commencement date for construction and a proposed build-out period. 12. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural design principles and guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, signage plans, landscaping, etc. 13. signage in the proposed PCD shall be in accordance with this ordinance. (E) The completed rezoning application and supporting preliminary Master Plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this information and make a report of its findings to 5 ~~ the Board of Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the Commission public hearing. (F) The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within 90 days of the receipt of the materials, unless the applicant requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary Master Plan. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within this period shall constitute a Commission recommendation of approval. (G) If the Commission recommends denial of the preliminary Master Plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the preliminary Master Plan, the Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. (H) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary Master Plan, and act to approve or deny the plan within 90 days. Approval of the preliminary Master Plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. The Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the final Master Plan for the PCD. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the PCD district. Section 30-57-7 Revisions to Final Master Plan (A) Major revisions to the final Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 30-57-6. Major revisions include, but are not limited to changes such as: 1. Any significant increase in the density of the development; 2. Substantial change in circulation or access; 3. Substantial change in grading or utility provisions; 4. Substantial changes in the mixture of land uses; _~ 5. Substantial change in architectural or site design features of the development; 6. Any other change that the Administrator finds is a major divergence from the approved final Master Plan. (B) All other changes in the final Master Plan shall be considered minor amendments. The Administrator, upon receipt of a written request of the owner, may approve such minor amendments. 1. If the Administrator fails to act on a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan within 15 calendar days, it shall be considered approved. 2. A request which is disapproved by the Administrator shall be considered a major amendment and shall be subject to the approval process outlined above for such amendments. Section 30-57-8 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans (A) Following the approval of the final Master Plan, the applicant or its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site development plans for any phase or component of the PCD that involves the construction of structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Roanoke County Department of Engineering and Inspections. (B) It is the intent of this section that subdivision review under the subdivision regulations be carried out simultaneously with the review of a PCD under this section. The plans required under this section shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision regulations, as determined by the Administrator. (C) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall be in compliance with the final Master Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall review and approve or disapprove any final site development plan within 60 days of its submittal. (D) No Planned Commercial Development district shall be approved and no work shall be authorized on construction until all property included in the final Master Plan is in common ownership. 7 ~-~ Section 30-57-9 Failure to Begin Development (A) Unless an extension is granted by the Administrator, failure of the applicant to submit a preliminary site development plan for at least one portion of the Planned Commercial Development district within 24 months of the approval of the final Master Plan, shall constitute an application on the part of applicant to rezone the PCD to the district designations in effect prior to the approval of the final master plan. Section 30-57-10 Control Following Approval of Final Development Plans (A) The zoning administrator shall periodically inspect the site and review all building permits issued for the development to ensure compliance with the submitted development schedule. 8 G - .s ARTICLE III DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-63 PID PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Sec. 30-63-1 Purpose (A) The Planned Industrial Development (PID) district is established primarily for light and medium industrial uses. Supporting accessory uses and facilities, such as office and commercial establishments, are also permitted. The PID district is intended to be designed with a park-like atmosphere that complements surrounding land uses by means of appropriate siting of buildings, controlled access points, attractive and harmonious architecture, and effective landscape buffering. The district is intended to provide flexibility in design and site lay out, allow latitude in combining different use types within a single development, and provide the developer with incentives to create an aesthetically pleasing and functional planned development. In addition, the intent of the Planned Industrial Development (PID) district is to provide certain industries that are clean and environmentally efficient the opportunity to locate in an area of like industries, in what is generally known as an industrial park, developed under a complete, comprehensive Master Plan. Standards are provided for landscaping, buffering and open space to encourage high technology industries and to ensure a park-like atmosphere. Important in determining the location and size of a PID are the accessibility of the location, the availability of public utilities, public safety services and the suitability of the topography for industrial purposes. Sec. 30-63-2 Permitted Uses (A) All of the residential, civic, office, commercial, industrial and miscellaneous use types listed in Article II of this ordinance are permitted in the PID district. Residential use types shall be limited to no more than 15% of the total gross square footage. No use shall be permitted except in conformity with the uses specifically included in the Final Master Plan approved pursuant to Section 30-63-6. Sec. 30-63-3 Site Development Regulations (A) Each planned industrial development shall be subject to the following site development standards. 1. Minimum district size: 15 acres of contiguous land. 1 G-a 2. Minimum front setbacks: All structures proposed to front on existing public streets external to the PID shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from ,the existing public right-of-way. 3. Lots in the PID district shall comply with the buffer yard requirements of Section 30-92-4 of this ordinance. 4. Lot coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be determined through the preliminary master plan process but in no case shall exceed 75%. 5. Streets in the PID district shall be public in accordance with VDOT and Roanoke County standards. 6. The applicant may propose a reduction to the number of parking spaces required by this ordinance for each use type, if justified. This proposal will be reviewed with consideration given to potential future uses of the site, parking demand and expansion potential. 7. Maximum height of structures: When adjoining property zoned Residential, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (side, rear, or buffer) adjoining a Residential district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. This distance shall be measured from the portion of the structure which exceeds 45 feet. In all other locations the height is unlimited. 8. Arrangement of areas: a. The location and arrangement of structures, parking, access drives, outdoor lighting, signs and other uses and developments within the PID, in addition to achieving these development standards, shall be accomplished in accordance with an approved final master plan to assure compatibility with the existing and future land use in the vicinity. b. All areas designed for future expansion or not intended for immediate improvement or development shall be specified as reserve areas in the preliminary master plan. The future use and the limitations on future use of such area shall be specified, or else such areas shall not be included as part of the PID application. Reserve areas included in the PID shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 2 9. Accessory structures shall not exceed forty percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure. 10. Every structure in the PID shall be a fully enclosed building of permanent construction. Any outside storage area shall be fully screened so that no materials so stored are visible at any lot line or public right-of- way. 11. Lighting: Lighting shall comply with Section 30-94 of this ordinance. 12. Utilities: Utilities shall be underground unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. Sec. 30-63-4 Site Development Recommendations (A) The Planned Industrial Development district should be designed and developed as an industrial park with high standards for landscaping, buffering and open space. To ensure a park-like atmosphere the following site development recommendations are made. (1) The principal entrance into the PID district should be sufficiently landscaped to comply with the purposes of this district. In addition, the first one-hundred linear feet of street, leading through this principal entrance into the PID, should have a landscaped median of sufficient width and planting density to meet the purposes of this district. (2) Parking within the PID should be located to the side or rear of the principal structures on the lot, wherever feasible. During review, consideration will be given to topographical constraints, innovative site design, buffering and landscaping factors. (3) Loading areas should be screened from public view and should not be placed in front yards. (4) Fences should not be placed in front yards except as necessary for security purposes. Fencing should be uniform and well kept. Sec. 30-63-5 Relationship to Existing Development Regulations (A) All zoning regulations shall apply to the development of the PID district, unless modified by the Board of Supervisors in the approval of the final master plan. 3 G-5 Sec. 30-63-6 Application Process (A) The timeframes outlined in the Section are the maximum timeframes mandated by the Code of Virginia. Roanoke County will make every reasonable effort to complete the application process within a shorter timeframe. (B) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff shall meet to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process. The applicant is encouraged to submit information on the scope and nature of the proposal to allow staff to become familiar with the proposal in advance of this meeting. (C) Any application to rezone land to the PID designation, shall constitute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section 30-14. The written and graphic information submitted by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. Once the Board of Supervisors has approved the final master plan, all accepted proffers shall constitute conditions pursuant to Section 30-15. (D) To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete a rezoning application packet. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information shall include: 1. A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot lines, and easements. 2. Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district. 3. A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PID district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific human-made and natural characteristics located on the site. 4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, historic 4 ~ -5 resources natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, known archeological resources, etc. K 5. The proposed conceptual location and number of structures within each land use of the proposed development. 6. The gross square footage for each use type proposed in the PID. 7. The proposed size, location and use of other portions of the tract, including landscaping and parking. 8. A traffic circulation plan, including the location of access drives, parking and loading facilities, pedestrian walks and the relationship to existing and proposed external streets and traffic patterns. General information on trip generation, vehicle classification, ownership, maintenance and proposed construction standards for these facilities should be included. A Traffic Impact Analysis may be required by the Administrator. 9. Reserved 10. The proposed schedule of site development. At a minimum, the schedule should include an approximate commencement date for construction and a proposed build-out period. 11. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural design principles and guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, signage plans, landscaping, etc. (D) The completed rezoning application and supporting preliminary Master Plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this information and make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the Commission public hearing. (E) The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within 90 days of the receipt of the materials, unless the applicant requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary master plan. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its findings to the Board of 5 Supervisors within this period shall constitute a Commission recommendation of approval. (F) If the Commission recommends denial of the preliminary Master Plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the preliminary Master Plan, the Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. (G) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary Master Plan, and act to approve or deny the plan within 90 days. Approval of the preliminary Master Plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. The Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the final Master Plan for the PID. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the PID district. Sec. 30-63-7 Revisions to Final Master Plan (A) Major revisions to the final Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 30-63-6. Major revisions include, but are not limited to changes such as: 1. Any significant increase in the density of the development; 2. Substantial change in circulation or access; 3. Substantial change in grading or utility provisions; 4. Substantial changes in the mixture of land uses; 5. Substantial change in architectural or site design features of the development; 6. Any other change that the Administrator finds is a major divergence from the approved final master plan. (B) All other changes in the final Master Plan shall be considered minor amendments. The Administrator, upon receipt of a written request of the owner, may approve such minor amendments. 1. If the Administrator fails to act on a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan within 15 calendar days, it shall be considered approved. 6 ~-S 2. A request which is disapproved by the Administrator shall be considered a major amendment and shall be subject to the approval process outlined above for such amendments. Sec. 30-63-8 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans (A) Following the approval of the final Master Plan, the applicant or its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site development plans for any phase or component of the PID that involves the construction of structures or facilities,. shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Department of Engineering and Inspections. (B) It is the intent of this section that subdivision review under the subdivision regulations be carried out simultaneously with the review of a planned industrial development under this section. The plans required under this section shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision regulations, as determined by the Administrator. (C) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall be in compliance with the final Master Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall review and approve or disapprove any Final Site Development Plan within 60 days of its submittal. (D) No Planned Industrial Development shall be approved and no work shall be authorized on construction until all property included in the final Master Plan is in common ownership. Sec. 30-63-9 Failure to Begin Development (A) Unless an extension is granted by the Administrator, failure of the applicant to submit a preliminary site development plan for at least one portion of the planned residential development within 24 months of the approval of the final Master Plan, shall constitute an application on the part of applicant to rezone the PID to the district designations in effect prior to the approval of the final Master Plan. Sec. 30-63-10 Control Following Approval of Final Development Plans (A) The zoning administrator shall periodically inspect the site and review all building permits issued for the development to 7 C, -5 ensure that the development is in general compliance with the submitted schedule. Item No. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: AUGUST 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of an undivided interest in a portion of the Roanoke Regional Landfill to the United States of America for National Park Service Blue Ridge Parkway Spur to Virginia's Explore Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ERECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 26, 1991, at a regular meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, the Board resolved that the it was willing to convey the County's interest in the Regional Landfill property to the National Park Service for the Parkway at the appropriate time (Resolution 32691-1). Construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Spur is scheduled to begin this fall. The landfill in currently in it capping and closing stage and it is time to act on the donation of the unfilled portion of the landfill for this purpose. The Easement Deed calls for a donation of a permanent assignable easement for the Parkway Spur. (See attached Easement Deed and ordinance.) BACRGROUND: The Blue Ridge Parkway Spur has been in the planning stage for the past 8 years and is about to begin construction as a permanent part of the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Spur connection, when completed, will serve as the only public entrance into Virginia's Explore Park. Roanoke County has assisted in the planning of the Parkway Spur and made possible an alternate route to Explore (Rutrough Road improvement) when it was evident that the Spur would not be ready in time for the Park's opening on July 1, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. The Easement Deed calls for donating an easement of the unfilled portion of the landfill for the construction of the }{-1 Parkway Spur, a permanent part of the Blue Ridge Parkway (map attached). 2. It further calls for the remainder of the landfill, the filled portion, to be dedicated for park, recreation and open space purposes. 3. The Easement Deed calls for a Memorandum of Understanding to be worked out between the landfill owners and the National Park Service on the dedication of the remaining portion of the landfill for park, recreational and open space purposes. 4. It notes that the landfill owners, Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton are responsible for any hazardous substances that may be present on the land. ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. This ordinance accompishes the following: 1. Executing the Easement Deed. 2. Dedicating the remaining filled portion of the landfill for park, recreational and open space purposes. 3. Authorizing the County Administrator to negotiate the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the remaining landfill for park recreational and open space purposes. Respectfully submitted: Approved: 1 ,/` ~_ ~~' ~ _~r~~/1_ Joyce W. Waugh Elmer C. Hod ~onomic Development Specialist County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~ f ~, I ~~ o \ OF '~~~_ Km'f ~\ u ~ \TiIA _\ ~W~~ ~t nrn~mm 0_ Y o ~ ~- ~ ~ {J F+1 ohm ~n ~ Il~mc~°. °°n O I ~~ ~ s~ ~m - ~ °w~m a O ~o~~ oZ o~ ~ e as r ao 5 ~~3 ~ F~ °ola II N ra - a ~ ~' m° 1''6_ ~ mao U ~' Z ° c~a z voice wa a~ o I I s b ~'S e ~ n o V \~ ° z > i„ ~ .~ Z O O ~ z Z 'n ° Q a. w tL m I I ~ ''abe~~ ~~\ .,, ~ t-o~YO= r~ ~ ~' a ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 0 5 ~ a ~ ~ n o O i m ~~-~ ~ J ~; w O - o I I ~ ~ A 1- ~ ~ as ~.5 ~ O a > I I 3 ~ / ~ ~ "(( w W ~ ~ O ° " In o ~ ~ mU II ~(~ W U s W Q. <~ (9U Q 4 ~ ~ ~~ II m `~ ~ ,~ ~ p (n aw a~ ° II /~°~ ,~~ ~ ~~~~ ~b Y Q z Z ~~ ~o I ~r ~i ~ e ~a ~ ~~~ ~w . ~`' rr ~ ~ Q Q m ~ ~ w w C'_^l s Oa7'i o" E~~ `~~.ha- =ice ~~j ~o~- d r Z ~ ~ ~ ~ m°o .Ct4s1 6 ~ ~ )/~~~o~ _1 U. o zs z ou 3 ,.9f.Z4.LS S ? 4 68', 'Z ~i "' o ~ ~~ ~ ~ 9" ~ ~/ ~~~~d ,~+a O ~ mood .S6S9 (~ ~ d~ '1'~ '~ F- - rc ~ ~ r. ~ ~d~ z x~~,, 03 ~~ °°~\ g c`~O ~17~ ~~V Z o ~1 °Jo° // w~ E`/ ~J d7 .a ~ L W J Y~ I ~ ~N ~ ~U / OU ., i. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ I. m Y ~ ~.. o y v ~ a ~ ~ '~,~~` I ( ~ % _ Z ~ ~ o ~ ~~ I 19-9v1 l ~ /~~ ~ n~ ~ ow I _ "' W m _ v ~Np U) ~ O Q O ~ ~'N ~ 3 3 .szso.99 s-_ ~ ~~ ~g I z ^ ~< ~ Q V " I ~ ~ `' ~> .9o sal ~ _ ~ °~ ~o v Z F- ~ v : ~ II `1 ~ 3 „01,65.49 S_~ /~/ ~~11 uu° _o a ~ LaJ m $ ° ~ mz /~ ~~ ~dUOZN ~ u~~ ~ o~ m°rn .tiosct 3Z oo w O ~ ~ i°~ o $~ ` SL~~_5 ~ 000 3 .ts.44.ae s-I'U~~~ ~N $ w J a Q~ °<~ z% ~) 2 "05 a m z~i w~. ~- ~''~a ar Z w ,BS~4f l i\ ? 0! o a s \\ twn ~ ~ 3 ,4Z,1S.49 N-~ p Q~ ~~ o v°~ o o ~ ~ ~ \ °~ ° Sx Y~ U ~ 00 ~ o v 0 w a .S6~L4Z m \` 6'z j °~ Q ~ Q~ o o ~ y~ ra ~ ~- I I a~ O o ~ ~>' a ~ °w ~_ -~ O) I~ m 111 ~" m ~i'r^ \ ~~-° ~~ ~~ b OZ r w o o \F Z i m 0 fJ ~ a 8- ~ ~ f-- ~ o ,-_1/ ~ o W ~ ~ _ °Y,Lf-64Z /\~~Zda -- /~~\ ~~IZ ,La090 ~ ~\ w O~ \ 3 ,6Z,90.LL S w~ 5 ,~F ~\ p J 3lOd / a O 2 1S ONVvFµ~,~~ ~Rp1 ~ l~~ d d3N2i0~5 Ntldl ~~ ~ /~ ~ ~ N P ~~ p5, 0~ .~{ ` o w ~ ~ i o ~~g P Y~ oo~ ~~5 ~ ~[ I \ O i m \ .9BSZZ z / /" I ° SAy' N` 55n. ~ 0 of 3 Lt.90.fB S m9~ ~'~~ 1 f Y__ "e < \\ Q ~ d~ ~ R v I -. e: - O° 3~ ~ o ~ ~ ali mm ~ \ \ zmo 3`ry mm° oZOf op i W Im \~ zr o O o ~~ ~ ~ Oo" ~~or 'r, ,' u' 00 a ~ zm o l O oa vl .n ~° 0 o w ~y ~~ g who .~x~ °o~ m ~o- J nc oa `'' m ,,. ~\.Ci \ \ R _ o W m rn "~ a °' d d'~ \`.i+ , a ° c U z mOo ui~~ a \ Jm~~ odd- nw- gnaw ~' n mxo lam a~ d s ° U'~ w ~ a 0 0 \`~" o m ~ 8 \~ m i w~ 'h ~~ ~~m~'S' ~~~ z a ~ p m fV K of N mod o ~~3~ O ~ ~~~ ~~: 6`r ati ~ y <~zw u pm ~ b~ ~O A J 9p8 w Oz °~ •by K¢FO °~ o~ auoi ~ I m~ ' o oho ooy I .. go Mgr/ ^..,~` mo iui~a tto ~Z Oa C• / KO - ~a\~~\ ~NZOZZ ('~. n~~ Gr ~Q~wO OO -1 Q N `/ / _ Q<~ Owl a2 mn ~ ~ O` ~ Winos ~ i`r zoo Nmoo~ ~G Zm ~ r / J w i°w f c~Q a W oQ n \~ 9 US" 1 mNO ~ ~ J\ °i~~i zoo°~u'r°, - F \ F ; OK II a~~~3 a\ / 'y~O (L O~ ~U ~o4 aw i ~ 3m .s ,~ 003 II nn201 ry~o. // ~y`l i~ OQF~Farj xz a d fi ~~ I:~~aO } ' ~ s aZx Ao. / ~ Z dl Do ~ ~10~ mV'Oi .~~ a¢a II nU ~~^4~/ O n, pm=Wpm ~ Z K ¢3 a .o d ~I ` 2 ~ O~ ~v or- I`owZ~ '~ zW U ~ `'i: Z /,°~ fO is ~viwo i`wo a r 8 I / ,~ ~a~°,n oar ~SSn \ ~ sV ~ 60 OO //~iO ~~ ` ~/~ tt ON~wa _ O I ~-._/<S B4\ ° :~ z2 Imo 3 / 2~ ~ ~C/ u~W z°o ~3 k' o o o'er ad 5 "!` o _ I ?o ~ y~,~ / Q,r wFO~owog ~ !S O' ] .~, mOr 4'yh/ 04 /~O ma K2 Qmtt a~ adz ~~> / \~`C /_~I In~alnzr~ i~ O W g-' y6. _ m v~ m Z Ie ~oe+ylr - so / ~ ~ 5` ~+ °'•, V ~`V .n m ~ a ~ 0 0 ~S ao K4Sa.. n O it n II n2 L/ ~O -ow v z~z oDw /`l, i0 I,pN1h ~~° O tt~v~`UV/ ~C e~. aim ~~iao a0 oW mss/ aK~ om SS Y~ r ~` In in w`jN iwQ uz ~ Igo r wS ~` ~ .101 LO'ZLl ..For I~aNp S ~? ^~ ,~ oN ~~ ~ \'M ,6Z,9S.f9 N z^ H m am a4o ~ o as $ b OZf ~Od 'Z L6 -9 0 .~ g ,~ ~, ZO-SO-0009 ON xVl to avN /° SM3MONd NNd 31WdW 3NOZ HLl105 W315A5 31%NION000 JO Alii3d021d 3NVld 31tl1S tlINI0i11N JO NVIOIM3W • l ' / I 'V AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S INTEREST IN THE REGIONAL LANDFILL PROPERTY (89.964 ACRES) FOR AN EASE- MENT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND DEDICATION OF THE REMAINDER FOR PARK, RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE PURPOSES WHEREAS, Roanoke County considers The Explore Park and related elements, i. e. Roanoke River Greenway, Parkway and Visitors Center, and the Spur Road of the Blue Ridge Parkway, to be one of its most important economic development priorities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Roanoke Valley Regional Landfill Agreement dated July 29, 1975, between the City of Roanoke, the County of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton, once the real estate used for the landfill is no longer utilized for landfill purposes, it will be made available for use as a regional recreational facility or area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on August 23, 1994; and a second reading was held on September 13, 1994, concerning the disposition of the County's interest in 1 ,~~- l 89.964 acres, more or less, known as the Roanoke Valley Regional Landfill; and 3. That the County hereby conveys to the United States of America its interest in said real estate for a permanent and assignable easement for a spur road of the Blue Ridge Parkway and for other limited purposes; and 4. That the remainder of its interest in said real estate is hereby dedicated for park, recreational and open space purposes; and 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a Memorandum of Understanding establishing the terms and conditions for the dedication of the remainder of the real estate used for park, recreational, and open space purposes; and 6. The County, the City, and the Town agree to bear all environmental responsibility and liability for the investigation and remediation of any contamination of this property arising from the migration of contamination from the adjoining real estate owned and used by the County, the City, and the Town for a regional landfill; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. agenda. reales[.landfill 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,~._~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE EXTENDING ACROSS A PORTION OF A WELL LOT IN LABELLEVUE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~~~ 2.C~~'~~~ l~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of an easement to Appalachian Power Company (APCO) for extension of an overhead line from the existing pole located on a County well lot in LaBellevue, Tax Map Number 39.02-3-28. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company is seeking an easement to extend an overhead line on the existing pole located on the LaBellevue well lot approximately 55 feet to provide service to a County residence on an adjacent lot (Lot 26, Block 12, Section 9, LaBellevue). APCO requires a right of way, twenty feet (20') in width, extending in a southwesterly direction from the well lot, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3062, dated August 2, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. The County staff in the Utility Department has checked the location of the proposed easement and determined that it does not interfere with the County's use of the property. {~ - a FISCAL IMPACTS' Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. ALTERNATIVES' (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for donation of the electric service line easement as shown on APCC Drawing No. R- 3062, dated August 2, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation of the easement and request from APCO the fair market value as consideration for the purchase of the easement. (3) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, ~,,~ ~~ 1 '. /" . 1~ ~ '', ~ /i l / ~/ ~ / - - Vickie `L. Huffmar~'/~ Assistant County ttorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to __ Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix i MAP SECTION 3780. 207A PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY `.- 55' ~! PROPOSED R/GHT A~ WAY 12a ~_- PROPOSED POLE --'' 207- 377 EX/ST/NG POLE 207-355 EX/ST/NG Pt~LE 207-369 ~- EX/ST/NG R7LE 207-354 LOT 26 ~ , LA BELLEVUE SUBD. SECT 9 COACy'y~9ti 207T COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA TAX DISTRICT 665000 VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT APPAUICHIAN POWER COMPANY ROANOKE VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION T.& D.DEPARTME PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY o~-.M.. G.O.P. oaa AUG. 2,1994 ~•*- •- J. BA, I I I r~ NOTTO SCALE setrr_L_w_L_sNan DRAWING NO. R-3062 ~"- ~939F/60d12-89 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE EXTENDING ACROSS A PORTION OF A WELL LOT IN LABELLEVUE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is the owner of a well lot in LaBellevue Subdivision, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 39.02-3-28; and, WHEREAS, in order to provide power service to a County residence on an adjoining lot, described as Lot 26, Block 12, Section 9, LaBellevue, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires an easement to extend an overhead line from the existing pole located on the County well lot; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easement does not conflict with the County's use of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. an electric line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on August 23, 1994; a second reading was held on September 13, 1994; and 3. That APCO's offer to purchase the easement for One Dollar ($1.00) is hereby accepted and the proceeds from the sale of the H a, easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to convey an electric line easement, twenty feet (20') in width and approximately fifty-five feet (55') in length, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3062, dated August 2, 1994, across the County's LaBellevue well lot (Tax Map No. 39.02-3-28) unto Appalachian Power Company; and 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. ACTION NO. ^~ ITEM NO. ~ J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM THE HEIRS OF BERNARD I. PAYNE FOR THE PINKARD COURT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ / /~,~~ ~~.,-p~.c'r~1-e~u,t4 ~U EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of a permanent drainage easement (0.043 Ac.) from the Heirs of Bernard I. Payne, deceased, for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project. BACKGROUND: In approximately 1984, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors added the Pinkard Court Project to the Rural Addition Priority List. In order for the Virginia Department of Transportation to approve Pinkard Avenue and Valley Avenue for acceptance into the state secondary system, it is necessary to make certain road and drainage improvements within the Pinkard Court Subdivision. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Bernard I. Payne, deceased, was the owner of Lots 19 and 20, Section 2, Pinkard Court, abutting Pinkard Avenue and Meadow View Road, and designated upon the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-1-36 and No. 87.08-1-37, respectively. In connection with the drainage improvements for Pinkard Avenue, acquisition of a drainage easement from the heirs of Bernard I. Payne is required. The proposed drainage easement, being fifteen feet (15') in width and consisting of a total area of 0.043 Ac., is shown on a plat dated October 20, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto. Based upon an appraisal of the proposed acquisition prepared by Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, the estimated fair market value of the easement is $533.00. -3 Staff has negotiated with Robert A. Payne, as a representative of the Payne heirs, to acquire the easement. The Payne heirs have offered to sell for no less than $800.00. Staff has agreed to this amount, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACTS' There is currently $2,500 in the account for Repairs to Rural Addition Roads and the purchase price for this easement would be paid from the available funds in this account. ALTERNATIVES' Alternative #1: Authorize acquisition of the proposed drainage easement from the Payne heirs for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project for the sum of $800.00. Alternative #2: Delete Pinkard Court roads from the Rural Addition List, due to costs and concerns involved with the necessary acquisitions. Alternative #3: Decline to accept the Payne heirs' offer to sell for $800.00, and direct staff to initiate eminent domain proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, V cki L. Huffm Assistant Count Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. I'~ TAX MAP N0. 87_08_ 1_37 & 36 SCALE:__~ ~~=20' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY BERNARD I. PAYNE PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 1020-92 ~-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM THE HEIRS OF BERNARD I. PAYNE FOR THE PINKARD COURT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, in connection with the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project, it is necessary to acquire a permanent drainage easement upon, over, under and across property owned by the heirs of Bernard I. Payne, deceased, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-1-36 and No. 87.08-1-37; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement, being fifteen feet (15') in width and consisting of a total area of 0.043 Ac., is shown and designated upon a plat dated October 20, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from the heirs of Bernard I. Payne for the sum of $800.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 23, 1994; and the second reading was held on September 13, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from the heirs of Bernard I. Payne a permanent drainage easement, as shown on the plat dated October 20, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, for an amount not to exceed $800.00. ~}-3 2. That the purchase price shall be paid from the available funds in the account for Repairs to Rural Addition Roads. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. ACTION NO. ITEM NO . l~7~ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT ACCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP EASEMENT FROM APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first authorize acquisition of access and environmental Caverns Landfill site, therefrom to the Roanoke BACKGROUND• reading of the proposed ordinance to a permanent easement for purposes of clean-up in connection with the Dixie and several unnamed drainages flowing River. In August of 1992, Roanoke County executed an "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action" with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to perform a removal response action at the Dixie Caverns landfill site. This removal response action includes work to remove stream sediments containing heavy metal contaminants: lead, cadmium and zinc, which may have been released from the site. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to comply with EPA regulations and standards, and perform the required removal response action, it is necessary to acquire a permanent access and environmental cleanup easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Appalachian Power Company (APCO). The easement to be acquired is more particularly described as follows: I~-y' A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, to construct, install, operate, inspect, use, maintain, remove, monitor, repair or replace certain improvements, including monitoring wells, and a perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT for access to and from several unnamed drainages flowing from the Grantee's Dixie Caverns Landfill site to the Roanoke River, for any purpose in connection with the environmental cleanup of Dixie Caverns Landfill, in accordance with all federal, state, and/or local mandates and requirements, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantor, acquired as Parcel I by deed dated September 1, 1971, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 926, page 738, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.00-1-5. Said easements are more particularly described on that certain plat entitled "EASEMENT PLAT FOR COUNTY OF ROANOKE" dated April 30, 1993, and revised May 12, 1993, prepared by T.P. Parker & Son, Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 15, page 111, said plat being by reference incorporated herein. The environmental cleanup and access easements herein granted are shown and designated upon saki plat as follows: (a) "CENTERLINE OF NEW 80' ACCESS EASEMENT" as shown on Sheets 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the plat. (b) "CENTERLINE OF NEW 50' ACCESS EASEMENT" as shown on Sheets 1 and 4 of the plat. (c) "CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' ACCESS EASEMENT GENERALLY ALONG CENTERLINE OF EXISTING ROAD" as shown on Sheets 1, 2 and 3 of the plat and "RESERVED FOR STAGING AREA" as shown on Sheets 2 and 3 of the plat. The total easement area to be acquired from APCO is 8.225 acres. An appraisal has not been requested on the APCO property; however, an appraisal which was obtained on an adjoining tract of land provided an estimated fair market value of $395.31 per acre of easement area. As applied to the APCO easement, the total fair market value of the easement to be acquired is $3,251.45. Staff has reached an agreement with APCO, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, that the County would purchase the necessary easement for the sum of $2,000.00, with the balance of the value being donated to the County by APCO. FISCAL IMPACTS: The purchase price of $2,000.00 for the permanent easement would be paid from the available funds in the Dixie Caverns Account. N-4 ALTERNATIVES• Alternative #1: Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a permanent access and environmental clean-up easement from Appalachian Power Company, in connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site, for the sum of $2,000.00. Alternative #2: Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance and direct staff to initiate eminent domain proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, V ckie L. Huf an Assistant Coun y Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs Hy AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT ACCESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP EASEMENT FROM APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE WHEREAS, in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill and in order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame as set out in the "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action," it is necessary to acquire a permanent access and environmental cleanup easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Appalachian Power Company, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.00-01-05; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke" dated April 30, 1993, and revised May 12, 1993, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 15, page 111; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from Appalachian Power Company for the sum of $2,000.00, which represents an amount approximately one-third less than the estimated fair market value of the easement area; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 23, 1994; and the second reading was held on September 13, 1994. ~~~ THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Appalachian Power Company a permanent access and environmental clean-up easement, as shown on the plat recorded in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 111, for an amount not to exceed $2,000.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. 5 _ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 R E S O L U T I O N 82394-6 A - 0.12 MILE OF RENWORTH SYSTEM AND TO ABANDON LINK B REQUESTING VDOT TO ADD LINK ROAD TO THE VDOT SECONDARY - 0.10 MILE OF RENWORTH ROAD WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has constructed and the Virginia Department of Transportation has approved, Kenworth Road on a new alignment under Project 1947-080-242,C501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as served by those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, which portions no longer serve a public need. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A - 0.12 mile to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, for which section the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Link B - 0.10 mile from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests that Link A be accordingly renumbered as part of the secondary system of state highways, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~s . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Vickie Huffman, County Attorney's Office ACTION NO. ,~L ITEM NO . / ~ ~ ~~ ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: A. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING DONATION OF 0.518 ACRE OF LAND TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN CONNECTION WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF KENWORTH ROAD AND VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY INTO THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM B. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A - 0.12 MILE OF KENWORTH ROAD TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS AND ABANDON LINK B - 0.10 MILE OF KENWORTH ROAD FROM THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~y~yM~~~ /~ ` EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of 0.518 acre of land to the Commonwealth of Virginia in connection with the construction, approval and acceptance of Valleypointe Parkway and the relocated portion of Kenworth Road. This agenda item also involves adoption of a resolution to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add the relocated portion of Kenworth Road to the secondary system of state highways and to abandon the old portion of Kenworth Road. BACKGROUND' Valleypointe Parkway was constructed as an industrial access road in connection with the Valleypointe Economic Development Project. In order to comply with state standards, it was also necessary to relocate a portion of Kenworth Road. A small triangular parcel of land, consisting of 0.518 acre, was acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for the relocated portion of Kenworth Road. The plans provided for donation of the remainder of this parcel to VDOT for maintenance purposes upon completion of the project. ~_~~~b SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Conveyance of the subject 0.518 parcel of land to the Commonwealth of Virginia is required in connection with acceptance of the relocated portion of Kenworth Road in accordance with plans previously approved and accepted by VDOT and the County. The parcel is completely surrounded by VDOT rights-of-way and cannot be developed. The County's use of the property is limited to easements for purposes of drainage and utilities, which would be reserved to the Board of Supervisors in the conveyance to VDOT. The relocated portion of Kenworth Road lies within the boundaries of this parcel and would be excepted from the conveyance, since the County guarantees the title to VDOT. Otherwise, the parcel constitutes surplus and can be transferred to VDOT for other public uses. In order to finalize matters pertaining to the realignment of Kenworth Road, Project 1947-080-242, C501, it is also necessary to adopt a resolution to request that VDOT accept the relocated portion of Kenworth Road, designated as Link A - 0.12 mile, into the secondary system of state highways and to accordingly renumber this section as part of the system. In order to do so, the County must guarantee the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. Since the new location serves the same citizens as served by those portions of the old road, the section of the old location of Kenworth Road, designated as Link B - 0.10 mile, no longer serves a public need and can be abandoned. The locations to be accepted and abandoned are shown on the attached highway map. County staff has inspected Kenworth Road and Valleypointe Parkway along with representatives of VDOT and have found the roads to be acceptable. FISCAL IMPACTS• None ALTERNATIVES• (1) Adopt the proposed Ordinance and Resolution. (2) Decline to adopt the proposed Ordinance and Resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, .; Vick L. Huff n Assistant County Attorney N-5~+b Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs j ~-5a, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING DONATION OF 0.518 ACRE OF LAND TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN CONNECTION WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF RENWORTH ROAD AND VALLEYPOINTE PARKWAY INTO THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM WHEREAS, in connection the development of Valleypointe and the construction of the industrial access road, Valleypointe Parkway, it was necessary to relocate a portion of State Secondary Route 1590, known as Kenworth Road; and, WHEREAS, by deed dated July 26, 1991, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1353, page 449, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County acquired a parcel of land for said improvements, consisting of 0.518 acre and shown upon a plat dated 17 May 1991, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 13, page 175; and, WHEREAS, the project plans provided for conveyance of the subject parcel of land to the Commonwealth of Virginia in connection with the construction, acceptance and maintenance of the above-named roads into the state secondary system; and, WHEREAS, the improvements (now completed) and the proposed conveyance serve the interests of the public and involve public health and safety concerns. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of N-5~,. this ordinance was held on August 23, 1994; and a second reading was held on September 13, 1994; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia in connection with completed improvements to Kenworth Road and construction of Valleypointe Parkway in the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and, 3. That donation of 0.518 acre of land in fee simple to the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized, excepting therefrom the relocated section of Kenworth Road and subject to the reservation of any easements for drainage and utilities as may be necessary for these purposes upon the subject property. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. µ-sb AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has constructed and the Virginia Department of Transportation has approved, Kenworth Road on a new alignment under Project 1947-080-242,C501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as served by those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, which portions no longer serve a public need. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A - 0.12 mile to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, for which section the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Link B - 0.10 mile from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests that Link A be accordingly renumbered as part of the secondary system of state highways, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Mrs. Chris Pickard, Alternate, will expire August 31, 1994. Mrs. Pickard accepted appointment as a regular Board member. 2. Grievance Panel Two-year term of R. Vincent Reynolds will expire September 27, 1994. 3. Industrial Development Authority Four-year terms of J. Carson Quarles and Ronald M. Martin will expire September 26, 1994. SUBMITTED BY: ~. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: t'~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~' ~ - ~2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGICENTER ON T ESDAY,R AUGUST C23~, 1994 MINISTRATION RESOLUTION 82394-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 23, 1994, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 12, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of July 12 and July 26, 1994 Minutes 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Social Services Advisory Board and the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission. 3. Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Barrens Road. 4. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Advanced Auto/Perimeter East. 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. 6. Resolution of Support for Construction of a National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. 7. Request for Acceptance of Mallard Lane Estates into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Resolution Extending Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV. 9. Resolution for Extension of Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. 10. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 11. Request from the School Board for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund for the Tech Prep Consortium. 12. Approval of Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Gary Robertson, Utility Director R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of the Revenue Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Steven A. McGraw, Clerk of Circuit Court ^° f ,~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 23, 1994, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 12, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of July 12 and July 26, 1994 Minutes 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Social Services Advisory Board and the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission. 3. Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Barrens Road. 4. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Advanced Auto/Perimeter East. 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. 6. Resolution of Support for Construction of a National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. 7. Request for Acceptance of Mallard Lane Estates into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Resolution Extending Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV. 9. Resolution for Extension of Time for Review of Basic Cable Rate Filings by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. 10. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. 11. Request from the School Board for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund for the Tech Prep Consortium. 12. Approval of Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ~c i July 12, 1994 503 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 12, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the mo:ith of July, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County - Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, July 1B, 1994 505 reviewed the services offered to localities by VACo including the newsletter, the legislative bulletin and summary, and the Directory of County Officials. He reported that the final decision on VACo's legislative program will be made at the annual conference in November. 2. Briefing on 1991 Water Proiects (Gary Robertson, IItility Director) Mr. Robertson reported that the project is on schedule and the costs have remained unchanged. He updated the Board on the water treatment plant and the water transmission lines. He advised that they had not been pumping water into the reservoir recently because the Roanoke River was down. Mr. Robertson introduced Bob Benninger who was recently employed as the Assistant Utility Director. Mr. Robertson was directed to coordinate plans with Mr. Hodge and set up a tour of the Spring Hollow Reservoir in the near future. 3. Status Report on Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Solid Waste Facilities (John Hubbard. CEO. Roanoke Valley Resource Authority) Mr. Hubbard updated the Board on the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority facilities. He announced that more trash was collected on May 16 than at any one time in the previous four years. He advised that the trains are making the round trip in three hours, and there has been substantial savings in travel July 12, 1994 507 for July 26. Supervisor Eddy asked that the School Board bring comprehensive options and detailed information. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the request for $226,375 and adopt the resolution with a total not to exceed $726,375 including the $226,375. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 71294-1 OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE AIITHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PIIBLIC SCHOOL AIITHORITY AITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF $726,375 SCHOOL BONDB WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board has determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") in the amount not to exceed $1,700,000 ("Bonds") to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Projects") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"), and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County has previously determined it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not. to exceed $500,000 to finance certain Projects and to sell the bonds to the VPSA, and WHEREAS, the Board now desires to increase the amount of the debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in July 12, 1994 509 Mr. Chambliss updated the Board on the committee meetings. The work session was set for July 26, 1994, with August 23, 1994, as an alternate date. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Vacating a Surplus Right-of-Way Located on Autumn Park Drive as Recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54, Autumn Park Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspectionsf There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the first reading and set the public hearing and second reading for July 26, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy None 2. Ordinance Vacatinc a 0.004 Acre and a 0.002 Acre Portion of a Dedicated Right-of-Wav as Recorded in Plat Book 16. Pace 122, Phase i of Wexford Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Encineerinq and inspections) There was no discussion and there were no citizens July 12,1994 511 There were no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading with the expiration date removed from the ordinance and set the public hearing and second reading for July 26, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS i. community corrections Resources Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Chris Pickard to serve a one- year term as a regular member. Mrs. Pickard's term will expire August 31, 1995. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-71294-2 Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the Consent Resolution after discussion of Item 4 and removal of Item 2 for a separate vote. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None Supervisor Nickens moved to confirm the appointment in Item 2. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None July 12, 1994 513 this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution after discussion of Item #4 and removal of Item #2 for separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt Item #2, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None PRESENT: Supervisor Kohinke RESOLIITION 71294-2.b REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LABRADORE DRIVE, APPLETREE DRIVE AND BRITANEY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD BYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and July 12, 1994 515 that a volunteer or regular employee be placed on the first floor to assist citizens. (3) He advised that he attended the New Century Council Cooperation subcommittee meeting and will serve as recorder of the group. (4) He announced that he attended the Explore Grand Opening and felt that the Explore Advisory Committee should have been given credit for their contribution to the project. Supervisor Minnix: (1) He announced that he would not be at the July 26 meeting because he would be in Florida on business. (2) He announced that he had accepted the position as head football coach at Hidden Valley Junior High School. Supervisor Eddv: (1) He advised that the New Century Council Cooperation subcommittee has asked that each local government designate one official member. It was consensus of the Board that Supervisor Eddy advise the Council that there are several members representing the County and all could serve in an official capacity. (2) He advised that Roanoke City has accepted the County~s invitation for a joint meeting, but that all board members cannot attend any of the proposed dates. He asked Ms. Allen to contact Mary Parker, Clerk of Roanoke City Council, for other potential dates. He advised that Botetourt County also accepted the invitation and that Mr. Hodge is working with their County Administrator. (4) He advised that Wayne Compton may attend the NACo annual conference in Las Vegas. There was Board consensus that Mr. Compton represent the County July 12, 1994 517 Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session at 5:05 p.m. pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) To Consider the Disposition of Real Property, Namely, To Consider an Offer to Furchase Surplus Well Lot. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECIITIVE SESSION R-71294-3 At 5:27 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None RESOLIITION 71294-3 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAB HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. ~- / July 26, 1994 519 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 26, 1994 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of July, 1994. IN RE: GILL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 3:06 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Ni:ckens (Arrived 3:16 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited July 26, 1994 521 WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the educational programs ~n Roanoke County Schools, helping to produce well-rounded students and teaching skills useful throughout a lifetime; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was recently recognized by the Virginia High School League as the Group A School with the best overall performance in state-level athletic programs; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was awarded the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup in recognition of the outstanding athletic ability of the students of the school; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School is the first school in the Roanoke Valley to receive the Central Fidelity Cup; and WHEREAS, this award represents a significant achievement, as it symbolizes a commitment to ex.:ellence in a variety of sports, and memorializes the nine Pioneer District Championships; the Region C Championships in Baseball, Tennis, Golf and Softball; and the State Championships in Baseball, Tennis and Golf, won by the Highlanders during the 1993-94 School year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the STUDENTS AND STAFF OF GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL for their outstanding performance in athletic competition and for receiving the fifth annual Central Fidelity Cup. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: July 26, 1994 WHEREAS, both events were important to the course of the Civil War in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS on the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, there will be a re-enactment of the Battle of South Salem at Green Hill Park in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the event draws a crowd of between 5,000 and 6,000 spectators and 500 re-enactors, and contributes to the tourism efforts of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby declare the weekend of July 30 - 31st, 1994, as "THE BATTLE OF SOUTH SALEM", and extends its best wishes for an authentic and successful re-enactment of the event. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix 3. Recognition of Melinda Rector for Receiving Certification as Professional Secretary. Ms. Rector was present to receive her certificate from Chairman Eddy. IN RE: BRIEFING i. Briefing and video on storm Restoration Efforts by July 26, 1994 525 IN RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading of Ordinances #1 and ~3, and set the second readings and public hearings for August 23, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance #2, and set the second reading and public hearing for August 23, 1994. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix 1. An ordinance to Rezone 2.0 Acres from I-2 to C-2 to Operate a Garden Center Located at 4925 Starkey Road. Cave spring Magisterial District. Upon the Petition of John A. Hall. 2. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Fast Food Restaurant at the Intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Westmoreland Drive. Cave Spring Magisterial District. IIpon the Petition of Tacoma. Inc. 3. An Ordinance to Amend the Text of the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance to Allow Replacement Oaly of Individually Sited Single Wide Manufactured (Mobile) Homes Throughout Roanoke County with a Newer Single Wide Mobile Home. July 26, 1994 provisions of Chapter 20. Solid Waste of the Roanoke County Code are in need of amendment in order to address the increasing demands and need for services by the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at a work session held on June 28, 1994, directed that this ordinance shall be adopted and implemented; and WHEREAS, the first reading was held on July 12, 1994; the second reading was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain sections of Chapter 20. "Solid Waste" be amended to read and provide as follows: SOLID WASTE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 20-1. Definitions. The following words and terms, as used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: July 26, 1994 ~~~€. waste means ang gar~Za~e;refi~sex traslY or dtl3er.ilisear a rrsatera~s ARTICLE II. COLLECTION BY COUNTY Sec. 20-21. Article not applicable to Town of Vinton This article shall not apply to residents or commercial or industrial establishments of the Town of Vinton, Virginia, an incorporated town lying within the boundaries of the county, since the council for the town has provided for solid waste collection for the residents of the town. (Code 1971, 14-7) Sec. 20-22. Responsibility of county administrator under article. The administration of this article, including the establishment of a budget for providing effective solid waste collection service; the hiring of all employees necessary for providing such service; the billing of persons receiving such service; all other matters related thereto shall be the responsibility of the county administrator, provided that all matters pertaining to the establishment of an annual budget and the establishment of collection rates and charges shall be approved by the board of supervisors. (Code 1971, 14-5) Sec. 20-23. Right to and application for, service. All county citizens, including businesses, firms and corporations located in the county shall be entitled to receive solid waste collection service consistent with the provisions of this article, subject to the determination of the county administrator regazding economic feasibility of providing such service to any particular location. Any person desiring such service shall make application through the office of General Services. Payment, if required, for one-quarter yeaz's service shall be made in advance at the time of application. July 26, 1994 1 July 26, 1994 Sec. 20-25. Supplemental collection service. .;;}.: July 26, 1994 ~~-} ~A v ~ tlrb `~ z) f it 'll r 11, 1. 11 r a }~ r,t.. .,l:a ur~,.•r^ ...,11^..r:..z, ^l. l~ i a e 1 1..+ ..F;^^ ..1,;r„rl^ r:., ^a rl,^ 1:Ln r r :' r ' o~ Quas ez ze S:zsa ~ o 0 : ., r,.rn r.,l^.,, ^t~ 1. ,.r ..rg F ' a ' L C71 n 1 ('2\ e r 1, 1, r: rt 1+ =, r r, a , ..~ '.^r..~ o^ r: 1+ rr r. }.,,.r.r~n F ++a^r.. .,.+a tl.^ t;t,^~ [~ r CA\ T r. a 1, ., t,^~ ^ ..^a:r„r rl,ree_L~\ ;,,..1,^..:++ a;.,rn.,r^r CC\ T., ^ r. r ,z ..1. n 1.:..z..1^ ~+ ^rn ^a t1,e_l;lr~ " ~~r 1. 1. a 1, r,-r ..1,-. r.,l,le _ r,a rl,^ 1;Le a uzz ~ r V (^ll >;Al' r. C/7 ^' ,ll..., ^ F...,..:.... o l..,rl.^a : :r~_nr,il ±l+^ 1:Le a {~.. re~~iss~~aa-~. ~xserhaxzie~]:y ~a~~ed4ri(~the ~ra~:~x ; July 26, 1994 3. Social Services Advisory Board Supervisor Nickens nominated Supervisor Minnix to serve a four-year term as Board Liaison to the Social Services Advisory Board. His term will expire August 1, 1998. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-72694-5 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix RESOLIITION 72694-5 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON TIIE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIB DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 26 1994, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of June 14, 1994, and June 28, 1994 Minutes 2. Acknowledgment of Acceptance of 0.22 Miles of Timberland Trail and 0.24 Miles of Ferguson Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber July 26, 1994 539 Supervisor Johnson: (1) He advised that he attended First Union's first anniversary celebration of the Card Products Customer Servicing Unit, and that they have exceeded the projected number of employees by 100. (2) He advised that he toured the addition to the Hollins Branch Library and that it is proceeding on schedule. Supervisor Eddv: (1) He advised that he attended First Union's celebration and press conference, and that they have exceeded the projected number of employees with plans to add more employees. (2) He asked about the status of the drop-off box for citizens' payments. Mr. Hodge advised that it will be several weeks before it is in service and a press conference will be held to announce it. (3) He asked about the status of the Sewage Treatment Contract. Mr. Hodge advised that it will be brought to the Board in August. (4) He advised that the meeting with the Roanoke City Council has been scheduled for September 12, 1994 at noon at a place to be announced later. IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS 1. Mr. Everett "Neil" Hartwell, 1420 Red Lane Extension advised that the quality of water at his home is unacceptable and asked for a determination of the responsibility for the situation between the County and the City of Salem. Mr. Hodge and staff were directed by the Board to contact Mr. Hartwell and investigate his complaint. It was also suggested July 26, 1994 541 complex, that the committee's report is a good "first step", and that the committee should continue their proposed schedule of reviewing additional items. Supervisor Nickens suggested that (1) there be no isolation of volunteer and rescue personnel in the make-up of committees; (2) standards be set for running gear on all apparatus; (3) the committee look at staff use of sedans vs. four-wheel drives; and (4) expressed concerns about the proposed rotation of equipment. Supervisor Johnson expressed his concerns about the proposed rotation of equipment and asked for more information. Supervisor Eddy asked for the following: (1) information from other localities concerning their experiences with rotation of equipment; and (2) that the committee's final recommendations include specific regulations for all issues, including equipment, staffing, funding, and response performance. Mr. Hodge advised that another work session will be scheduled for the September 13, 1994 meeting. 2. Work Session with the School Board on School Capital Improvement Program (CIP). (4:30 p.m.) BEGAN 5:05 P.M. Chairman Frank Thomas called the School Board to order at 5:05 p.m. with all members present. He advised that the School Board and staff, together with the County staff, compiled the School Capital Improvement Program. The CIP is an informational document which contains the full capital needs of the County schools for the next ten July 26, 1994 543 vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECIITIVE SESSION R-72694-6 At 7:06 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix RESOLIITION 72694-6 CERTIFYING EXECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the July 26, 1994 There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Kohinke moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ORDINANCE 72694-7 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ROGER HALE AND BARBARA HALE TO OPERATE A PRIVATE HORSE STABLE LOCATED AT 4264 SPICEWOOD LANE AND 4324 WESTWARD LAKE DRIVE (TA% MAP NOS. 54.02-1-12 AND 54.02-1-4), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roqer Hale and Barbara Hale have filed a petition to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02-1-4) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to operate a private horse stable located at 4264 Spicewood Lane and 4324 Westward Lake Drive (Tax Map Nos. 54.02-1-12 and 54.02- July 26, 1994 547 use permit to construct a religious assembly in four phases, and that the Planning Commission recommended approval. Mr. Parkhill advised Supervisor Nickens that if it is determined that screening is necessary for the detention pond, he would have no objection to doing this. There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the Ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ORDINANCE 72694-8 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO D. JEFFRY PARRHILL TO CONSTRIICT A FACILITY FOR RELIGIOII3 ASSEMBLY, INCLIIDING CLASSROOMS AND FELLOWSHIP HALL TO BE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF FEATHER ROAD AND TEMPLE DRIVE (TA% PARCEL 71.07-1-26.2), VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, D. Jeffry Parkhill has filed a petition to allow the construction of a facility for religious assembly, including classrooms and fellowship hall to be located on Hardy Road at the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on June 28, 1994; the July 26, 1994 549 Petition of the Roanoke County Department of Economic Development. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoninc) 0-72694-9 There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Ordinance. The motion carried by the rollowing recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ORDINANCE 72694-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.76 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HOLLINS ROAD BET[gEEN TINRERBELL LANE AND LOIS LANE (TAB MAP NO. 39.09-1-4 AND 4-1) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 AITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 28, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held July 26, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 5, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: July 26, 1994 551 Corporation N. 41 deg. 00 min. 00 sec. E. 351.25 feet to a point; thence with the line of other property owned by Adrian L. Anglin, Jr. and Debra G. Anglin N. 36 deg. 22 min. 30 sec. E. 217.00 feet to a point; thence again with the property of Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation N. 45 deg. 44 min. 00 sec. E. 347.33 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Hollins Road; thence with Hollins Road the following four courses and distances: S. 24 deg. 31 min. 30 sec. W. 297.72 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right with a chord bearing S. 32 deg. 50 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 192.86 feet; thence S. 41 deg. 08 min. 30 sec. W. 294.39 feet to a point; thence S. 47 deg. 47 min. 00 sec. W. and an arc distance of 171.33 feet to the place of beginning, containing 2.163 acres, as more particularly shown on a plat dated August 21, 1984, prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy 4. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Horse Stable Located at 4041 Barlep Drive. July 26, 1994 55 second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on July 26, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Mona S. Sutphin to allow the construction of a private horse stable to be located at 4041 Barley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District, subject to the following condition: a) There shall be no more than five horses kept on the property. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix 5. Ordinance yacatinc a Surclus Right-of-Wap Located on Autumn Park Drive as Recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 54. July 26, 1994 555 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 12, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a surplus portion of the right-of-way located on Autumn Park Drive in the Autumn Park Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and shown on a plat of record in Plat Book 15, at page 54, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1- 482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: (a) That a 50-foot right-of-way be retained by the County. (b) That the vacated property be added into and com- bined with Lot 1 of Autumn Park Subdivision, by recordation of a plat approved by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. (c) That the County reserves and retains a property interest within the property for use as a 15-foot wide drainage easement; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. July 26, 1994 557 6. Ordinance Vacatinc a 0.004 Acre and a 0.002 Acre Portion of a Dedicated Right-of-Way as Recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 122, Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. IIpon the Petition of Ron Jackson. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-72694-12 There was no discussion and no citizens were present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the Ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix ORDINANCE 72694-12 VACATING A 0.004-ACRE AND A 0.002-ACRE PORTION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN PHASE 1 OF WEBFORD SIIBDIVISION (PB 16, PAGE 122), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ron Jackson has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate 4.90 feet of a 54.90-foot wide right-of-way located off Homewood Circle in Phase 1 of Wexford Subdivision, Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 16, at page 122 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, July 26, 1994 559 thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Ron Jackson shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a further condition to the adoption of this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall be indemnified of and held harmless from and against all claims for damages to any improvements or structures within the old easement area by him, his heirs, successors, or assigns. 5. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. on motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix IN RE: EBECIITIVE SESSION July 26, 1994 561 a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following rECOrded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Consideration for County Maintenance of Stormwater Detention Ponds. (8:00 p.m.) Mr. Hodge, Mr. Mahoney, and Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections, briefed the Board on the history, present status, funding alternatives, and liability issues that should be considered if the County establishes a maintenance program for ACTION NO. 82394 - 7a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission and the Social Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the July 26, 1994 meeting. 1. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Supervisor Eddy nominated Chief Bobby Fronk, Cave Spring Rescue Squad, to serve a four-year term as the medical representative which will expire June 30, 1998. 2. Social Services Advisory Board Supervisor Nickens nominated Supervisor Fuzzy Minnix to serve a four-year term which will expire August 1, 1998. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Johnson to confirm No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Appointments Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred ( ) Kohinke X Minnix X To ( ) Nickens X cc: File Highway & Transportation Committee File Social Services Advisory Board ACTION # 82394 - 7b ITEM NUMBER ---~--`-J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Barrens Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : " ~~~+~'""~`~ Jt~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Barrens Road Extension, Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Balzer & Associates entitled Barrens Road Extension, dated December 13, 1991, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water construction is $23,000. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the Barrens Road Extension along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. K-3 SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robe tson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Ho e County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Johnson to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred Kohinke X to Minnix X Nickens X cc: Gary Robertson File Arnold Covey ~3 fl ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ F= d• C F M F= ~i T d_ IV fl b C C T ('~ t~f Ni ~ 1~i T TI-fTC (1F~il_ II~F(1 :'iF F~.CGM~~IT gNfl dCCT^N~/FNT mark tnic 1?~,n ~~?av nr _li_~iv igGd_ by anri k:at,wpcn~ Fricnrigi-~in Lharnr gnart,m~?nt \/ill.anp (',nrnnraT,-nn _ _ .__ . _ _ _ . _ ,_nc i cvclnncr Harty of tnc i rct Hart tr.c R:_::,~ri h~?rcinaftpr rc=arrcri to ac ~' "~ (1F CI is=~F,?VT`.f'RC nc gr^~p.p,i(':k_~ {"a__~! itiTV , \/TR(; T NTd. • nprpi naftcr rcfarr r tr, aer,i-c °Fcnarri_" Harty {ir the carr~rri narT• anri FI M~i'~ i^_ i-Ifiil(;F; ('ni:nT~r ~r-IminicT,raT.nr n= Rnannkc ^n:_:nty VTR(:TNT6,_ tarty n= the t,nirr! Hart, • :N T T ti F C C F T H; T6-I~T Fi_.R D,NfI TN ^(INCTi~FG~.TT^N of the m::t::al hanai=itc t,n arrri:c• +n._ Ilc~,rclnncr rlnoc norcny ~;Rp_vT :^ii~li/~~,'• ~CCTi;t~J dNi; Ttrd,NCFFt=!_ with t.hc r~y~nant.c nr r : `'- (:FNFRnI ItiARRd~JTV (lH TTTj F_ in =cp cirr;nlc ~int,n t.ho Rnar~i all wat,ar anriirr cawpr ~lncq ~/alycS_ Titt~n~c_ latcralc r^nnncrtinnc~ crnrar,c far^iiii-ioc cn:irrcc nr Wai-,or ciinnl\i_ ni:mnc manhnlcc anti anv anti a~ i nthcr crn:inm.ant ar,ri an~i_irtcnanrcc t,hflraiintn_ in anti to t,ha ~~;atcr an.rilnr cpwcr c[icficmc irk tha ctrcoi•.c; ar;cni~~g ~nrj n:~nl it ~_it ~ 1 itv Watcr ant. %,~r c.pw~r aac~~npnt, ar~a~ t±~at, hay;. ~c_?n nr may hcrca=tcr ha ~nctall~ri h~% t,nc i:p~;alnncr a'~n~ with tnc rinht to n,nr•~at:ially :ico ant, n,-r~inv the cagcmcntc it which the c.amc may he lnrat,cri_ al i of whi!^h is mnrc nar~.ir^i:larly cnnwn anti riac~rih,~rl anrj ric~innat.prl a~ rnllr,wc_ i-.n Wit.• A.c ghr:wn nn the Sian cnt.itlpri ~arranc Rnari Fvtcncirn r~tcr! iicrc:nnor 1'2 _ ~ Q~ 1 ma. rip by ~a i 7pr R. dccn,-i af:oc and nn f j ~ a i n t.i-ic ?n,,n~-~k. (',ni;nt.a Fnninccrinn flcrartmcnt Pano j nf' ?. K3 Thn flo~rclnnor r-{npc, h~rcn~;i rntronant. anti Warran=, that, ii-_ will hp rccnnncihi~ fnr t,ho nrnncr inct.aiia+inn am rr.nctr~_~rtinn of thn cam water anri,•'^r cc~.rnr ctie.t.c~-;c inrliiriin~7 rcnair n= c~_irfarc arcac ar"f~rtcri by gntti,omonT of iiriii±v fi.r~n^hcc fnr a ncrinri n= nnc f 1 l uoar arT~?r rlatc nT ar~~nnt.an^o hti T,'r;' ~?n.ar,-i a.r:r-i . , ,. will nertnrm any na~ecearv r~nairc at etc rnc_= Flmcr (' I-In{inc ~.niinty d:?minictratnr of Rnann;~a i'ni~nttr \~ir,_inia narttr of t.h t.hirr nar+._ hcrpny is-;inc in t.hp cvpri;t.ir-,n of i-_hic incT.ri_imcnt, t_n cinnif~r t.ha arrcnt.a,r;^o of t.hiq rnryctianrc n{irgiiant, t.n F?pSnli_;tinn Nn, arnnt.ari by ±,M~ R_narri of ;iincrtiicnrc of Rnannka Cni;nty_ Virninia_ WTTitf ~'CC TI-IF i=(11 I tIWTNr Si nnat.i_irae am qoa 1 c ilctrc 1 nnc r - ' ~~ R,, ; - ~---~,p - Rv- a ~ _ _ ('minty/.t.li-~•,r nf; _-~~3h.Ak~ fi.n ~,rit.: Thp fnr~.Jn~nn rrccr w_„c ar-;knnwicrirln~ h~fnr`? rpa t.hic: p t~ ~-~. _ riay of ~u~~-~-- _ 1 G 1 ~_: (liiiv aiii-..,nri~cr-I nffir^pr Tir.la nn h~ ha Z f of ~~t__rL~~~C~.~ 1' ~ Z M R- !fie ~ I C> ~0 ~ A tJr,tarv D~:hiir ~.{t~ ('nrr,m~{:inn cx~irac~ ~~1 1 ~S~ ~ 1 I~ - Pane 7 of ~ ~3 Gnnrn~ic,-i a- to fn~m- Cnimty dttnrncv Mato nr• to l..'1t • iYio fnrpnninn rioari wac a~Gnn4rlnr-ncr! hp f,-ro ma ~_hic; _ y rl a_ v n r-- -- ., 1 4 h~i Flmar f`, :!n{inc ('niin=,~/ Arminic=,rar.nr_ nn h~hai~ nr ti~.a Rnarri of ~~~ncrvi~nrc ni= Rnan,nkc ('minty 1/irninia _ __,. - - ---~ s ~ ... __ Nr~T.arv P~inl it My ('nmmiccinn cvrijrcc; ('ni_int~/ d,rminict,ratnr nr ianannk~ Cn~_int.y_ \lirninja Rv Gc~,iicFii iQ/1F/Q(1 pang ~ of ~ k-3 NORTH \,\ i~t~ I 2 ~ I 'is I 1 ~ ~ 1- a~: ~L~1 I: ~; ~i`~ ~ I I I C ~:];y u.. uTH pqN - rllll i I rw n»•w /.i N' •'°S! M~~~ ~_ t 1\~ \ \. S~i'El - ~ '1` KT ~ ~iW..r. I -'I ~1 ~ ' I 1 ~ O I ~., ~t~=~•.CT'fir~ww \'~ I ~ .\.r.. p9L h. "fir • '•~ I ~ I +Si n:w I ~ Q O i /v` ~ ~ ....,»; w,.,n w•• ~ Y7 1 i \ ..~.+ ~u~ I , i .tr.7:' L:w ~~ - r'I ~ ~1 it I / - ~,,. \ N 'I~ 1....:,:.® _ - ~'` it 1_ ~ . - =..r: ~ . w >; ~ I~~i n ^ ' ,. ~ l i i ,,,w ~ir \`"~9so~ "soot ;._ =.: :I 1' , ~I •• ~~ J.M, i ; I F i 1 i~ ~ ~;~~,,~.~ /` s~~ ',1~ n O~e~~~~ I 1 !~-"`1""~L'.' ; f..'1. ~..,,,,,, w•..'^ I ~ ~i i I~' ~ ii ^--•-~ ~~- • :~:- - ._...=a~M.__ 111 1~;' ~1 -~ I ~ 1 Vii` o .~. ~:.::irri: r... .r..s...Lw.L. °3. ~.... .~..~~.~' L •Lw~;.-`~.,m'.'•'w•» `/ .I,1 .I +.~ ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACTION # 82394 - 7c ITEM NUMBER --~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Advanced Auto/Perimeter East COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~c~°~'~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Perimeter East, The Webb Stevenson Company, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled Perimeter East - Sewer Extension, dated December 22, 1988, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $9,300. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary sewer facilities serving the Advanced Auto/Perimeter East along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. K-`+ SUBMITTED BY: Gary Ro rtson, P.E. Utility irector Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Johnson to approve Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens APPROVED: ~~ i~~_ -~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs X X X X X cc: File Gary Robertson Arnold Covey K-7 n~~n ~~ ~e_~~n.iF=niT b_~~n o_cc ~ r,n~~+.~F=~i-r- TNTC fjFl=f'; nFFn (1G FBCFivfFN i p_Ivll G.CCTr_NIviGNT _ ~naric T,ni c ':1=t1 rip;; n= =f{i i ~r _, 1aQd_ nv ann I^:at,~,d,?on- i na W~nh titcyancnn i''mm~pnv hcrcinafrcr rafarrcn t.n pc t,ha "ila«ainnnr. nart.y of t_nc fi rc,t. nprt = the ~(lpGil ;'i~ Ci._iRF~\/TCQRC fly R(10t,liill~ i.;(11)~i T V vTR~;T~iTfl _ norcinpTt,cr rcr"orrarj t,n pc t,hc "Rnarrj ~ " nart,y n= t.Yia cannnri nart.• anrti FI M1=,~?~ f;. I-aflil;~_ ~^n~_,n±. \r Qriminict,rpT.nr n~ ~npnr~Ecc ~;niir;t.\r; \/TR(;T~ITfl, party of t,ha Tnirri r?prt, ui i T N F~ C F T I-1 , TI-l~.T Gt1R 6Nil TN ('f'1NCTf1FR,e,TTf1N nr t,hc m~tt,l_ip i hcnafjt,c t,n prrriic. t,nc flcvolnnar rlnpc hcrr~ny (;R,eNT_ (''f~N\/;=V_ gCCTi:N QNiI TRD,~iC~Fi,?.. wjt,h the r,n~rpnpnt,c nT .FNFReI Wp,RRANTV (1F TTGI F. in fpp gimnlc {int,n t,hc Rnprri all wat.or anti/nr ccyior lincc. ~ral~rcc~ fitt,innc_ lat.cralc. r:r~nnnr•tinnc_ ct,nranp farjliti~c_ cnl_irrcc nr." wpt.nr ciinn i V. n{imnc, mannn lac anr4 anv anr! a i 1 (,thcr cni_iinmant anri anni~r cnanrac t.hnrc{;ntn. in anri t.r~ t,nc water pnriinr ccwcr cvctamc in tnc ct.rcctc. a~rani,cc anri niihl i.^ {iti i j'~,v water pnri/nr ccwar caccmnnt arcac. that have hccn nr may harcaftcr ha jnctai icri by t,;r:p flc~/olnnar_ alnr;n \.~iTh t.hp rinnT. t.n norn~t.lia~i?r iicp anri n.^rlln~i t,i-Ic opgcmcnt,c in which t,hc ca^Ic may i-ha lnrat,prr'. ail of wi~;r:h is mnr.~ nprt.jrt}lari~r chnwn pnri ricc.rrihcri pnrj riagir7natpr ac fnllnwc_ t,n i./it~ 8c q~-Inwnr,n t,hc plan ont,it, icri Garimct,or Fact - Ccwcr Fvtonc.inr: r'Ipt,pri Ilcramnc~r ;~~, iQKst mpri~ h~/ T, G. Pa~k;p^ R. Cnn anri nn file it ~,he Rna,r.ntcn Cnl;nt.~/ Fnr~lincarin~ ~icr~arT,mcnt„ PpryP. 1 of 3 i<-r T r;c i}~~%pir:ncr rincc har~ny ,^n~~ananT, anti warrant that i= w i 11 ha rec..^r-:.;^cihi =nr the nrnn~r inctal latinn anri rnncr~,irtinn - the ca ir! water anri/.^~r _c~.~cr .. cyc=.cmc_ in~l!~n-nn rpnair r- ciirrarc arcac aTTCrtcri by ccrtlamcnt n= pit Zt~r ,. trcnrnoc .,n.~,, a ncr~nr nr nr~? i, 11 vcar a=tcr Marc of arrcntan,^a by the ~na~n ?nn at. ~r.c ~nc..- wi 1 i ncrfnrm an~% ncr~cca r•,; rcr:a i rc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . Flmcr ~";, i-in{i~ia_ ('niinT.~; ariminictrptnr nr Gnanni~o fniinty 1~irninia n.arty .. .. rr t.np r.nirrl narr._ naroh•,: injnc in the cvari_~tinn nr thic inctriimant to cinnirv t,h~? arr^cnt.an{:c of t,rniq rnn~%c~/an<^p n~irciianT, t.n .R.ccr,l!it.inn Nn, a{-Innt.pri h~_ t-hc Kna r%ti nr Ci;nc r~i i cnrc n= i•?•nanni..p ('n!_!!?t.~! _ \j i rni n i a , WTTNF~C j a~ F(ji i (linl i N(; cj nnat,i~rcc a.r;ri cca 1 c = ilcti%c 1 nnc r : ~~- w__~`~.~/ J~.~C.~~~ ~^`~ry-e/~t Rv._.... :.. Rv• a ~ ~ -- az,~, _-~_ - -~~ elate n-. South Carolina fni_inT.vi^iT.,/ n~- Greenwood Tn LI~t: Tnc T{~rcnn ~n.J r?car! wa= ar%;nr~dla;-incr f~afnrc me i•,nic; 20th -v -~av nT -- July _ -+ 1 _~, 94 _, k~r• J. Patton Webb ~~ Manag_i~. Partner f1i, i~/ aiit,hnri7ori nr~ ;rcr T ~t,ln The Webb Stevenson Company nn hchal~ nr - 9/05/2000 hiv f'nmmicginr cYnircc~ __ -.- Pane ~ nt K-4 ~,nnrn~lpri ac, T,n Tnrm~ i nllnt••! flttnrnc\! Ctatc n- (:.'1llnt\!%(: 'ITV nT' r2 y to wit I tic TnrA_:'7n'n:7 r.cc^ wac _unn~.t l: nl:Ali !'^cTn rA mA tI^:~ C' _ - ~ riav n~ 1% • _- ~~r Fmor ('__ I-?nrnc_ I":nl:n~,~r S,rc~in?cT,raT,^r'_r,.r hcnalr nT t,hc ~narri n+ CC~ncr\iicnrc n•A P.nann;c~? {'n,InT,v, \/irnini..., i~Jrt,ar~r Pllnli~^ ivlli Cnmm i ccinn cvni roc; f nl_InT,v arm i n i ct ra?•,nr nr +~rnar.n'uc (•nnnty liirni~ia ~lmcr ('_ I-inri~rp Rcviccrl 1(1/th/Q(1 - --= - -- patio ~ nr K=y NORTH ~ ~o • o~ ~ o,~ o~ ~~ /~'/ ROANOKE COUNTY pERIMETER EAST - SEWER E%TENSION UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACTION NO. 82394 - 7d ITEM NUMBER 1\ "~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit and One- Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. has requested a permit to hold a raffle and one-time bingo game in Roanoke County on October 29, 1994, and has submitted applications for each use. These applications have been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends they be approved. The applications are on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the applications for a Raffle Permit and One-Time Bingo Game be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ';/ i ~ ,,/) Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hod e Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by• Johnson to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) approve Staff recommendation Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred ( ) Kohinke X Minnix X To ( ) Nickens X cc: File Bingo/Raffle File BINGO PERMIT APPLICATION K s ~S v Application is hereby made for a bingo game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Bingo games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sect. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization ~ °:~ ~ S Mailing Address [~32~ Merr~r,nc~ ~:cr ~~~ City, State, Zip Code ~~ 'nn ~jt1 2~[ d ~ ~ When was the organization founded? ~~(~ Z Purpose and Type of Organization L Ic_rr1E'.';~~Gr ~; `-,~,r~~r}! ~-17~~ _ Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES ~( NO Is the organization non-profit? YES~_ NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES~_ NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~ •~ Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~ ~~, COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any ~assification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Bingo Games ? -~ GROSS RECEIPTS from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL TOTAL DAYS OF WEER AND HOURS OF BINGO ACTIVITY: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday ~_Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From I ~ ~m To 3 ~,~ C'C-t 2~t')-- ('1~~ ~ ~~ Specific location where Bingo game is to be conducted? 4 ~y cr 'rr~~i ~ 7 - ~,- ~ z e ~ 4-,~ ~, This permit shall a-valid only for the above location. Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~l~ ~~r C%C.e'~C~:~ ~,..Y"`.-Y~ i`~~ {~ lc= `~F h t,~c"~G ~.~% ~ I I bc' U`~~'c~ b ~t~~ ~ i ~ -I~ '~~,,-~r,c~~ ~ch~;L.i J~,~ Ni~~~< / ~ cc~~ :~t~~s,~i- .; L v r ~ ~..~+I ~~ r1u-t` b ~ c~(q~ -~~c~l .-~-cr~~ C;,;ict ~~tu >~r,c, -~crk=~ "~ hc~ ~- ci ~~ cam. ~-h n~i r . .1 COUNrY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a Officers of the Organization: ~~~ President : j~,~ ~ Lt>, r t --, _ Phone : ~~ - i 3 ~ ~f J Address: L~~-,~) ~)[1m-Y,~~ ~~-r [~, J~dCi'1a k~ U~ 2~r G l~: C.u President: ~~ ,~ ~i t_Ci<~-~r rd Phone: ~ 7Z- (}51~~% Address: ~j~~IP~ i~ ~f f i'~r~C~n ~~ 1`tiC`Ci(l~fle V 1~ 2~(G~I Y Secretary: _-~j(,~-}-hv .~ lr~a~~ Phone: C~C~ ~ C)~jC)~~ Address: ~~~ ~ C~ ver h ~ ~~ Treasurer: {~~c; °~ ~- i~ C~ci i~ry~ry+'~ Phone: ~ -; ~ - ~`~ 2 Address: x'-177 131~c t~~r~d ~.~,~ci~ ~O<~'la~r ~/f\ 2`i~'~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Bingo operations: Name: Qj ;rY~Cifrc ~C!nn~nG~ J~G~c~~~~ 11'1G1cc1~7~ Home Address ~~35 ~:.CCis~ ~U'n ~-~~dc~ 7t~Lt~' ~~l~D ~~n-[ ~~~i ~~i 2`(~l~v Phone ~1~~~ = ~~~`1 Bus Phone G'~ - ~ 52 ~. Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name: ~ -c~ ~- L~-~ni~ I~r~;.n~n Home Address ~~(~ ~ 'r~.~i~~~hlr~~ "~~~r-~~ i~~c-;',o3=~ V~ Z~(C)~~' Phone ~~~{ -t-I ~Z7 Bus Phone Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? IF ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COIVIlVIISSIONER OF TIC REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 .~.. 3 NOTARIZATION I~ THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: I hereb~~`Sswear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. a of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. Si b F ~ ~ 7 ~% C..- ~- ~I Name Title Subscribed and sworn before me, County/any of~e-~~, ~ . cJL~ Virginia. . ~ `"My commission expires: ~~ 198 Notary Pu 1 c NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Commissioner of the Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROA~'r10I~E, V-~OINIA COMMISSIONER OF Z'I~ REVENUE Address ~/~ Z YC7 i ~ this ~~~;~-day o 19~ in the ~;~~ P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION j~ 5 ~~. Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of Organization ~~~nn F ~res-i- Elam ~-}cry ~hco I Mailing Address (93~ Nlc°rn~`nc-z ~~~ 5wJ City, State, Zip Code (~C~c-nc~~~ ~//~ 2yDl£~ When was the organization founded? IC17z Purpose and Type of Organization [= lemer,~ G,~ ~,n..i ~ A Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES ~' NO Is the organization non-profit? YES~_ NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES_~_ NOS Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~; ~; COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIIZGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMMISSIONER OF TI-~ REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 Officers. of the Organization: G •, l'' K-s President: Qnn~ Ci~rn-i Phone: i - JI ~.~ Address: y(~00 ~urY~r~ne.r-S~t Dr ~Zc~C'n~~ ~/A 2~IOt~ i~ Phone : ~ 7 Z C:USIp O ~F-ie"e President : ~` ~- r i L a nG-{~rrd Address: ~i~14~, MFrr~ma-, Ind ~oC"c~r~K~ V/k 2~{Oi~D Secretary {~r~-E v 1~0~ fc,-~ - Phone: ~ C~ -• U~y`~ Address: 3425 C'verh" II ~ T;~",i ~c~t~,~r,~ ~~ 2`i~tb Treasurer • ~~~ ~ Li~d~, ~rr)`~lr1 Phone : `~ il'-I • X1531 Address : ~N ~ ~ ~1 c b,r~l G rc 1~ ~6C~no k"c' V A 2'-loi fs Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name: P~nrl~r~rc{ ~~r,nr~~s - 17~r-c~n Mc1C~-~~ Home Address (~b3s 5~>c~a~~v~"~i,dcs - ~Z~U ~~=r'~ f~~ !~ Phone ~~~~-~5y Bus Phone - ROC:°lU ~ VA 24~~~ ~Q - Cos 2~ Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name: ~~ ~ ~ i~C~r. ~l~r~~yv.~ Home Address 3`{'1"1 lu ~• ~,irc+ Clrr~~e ~GCf1C-ke yA 2~10i~ Phone ~~~ • ~15.~~1 Bus Phone F. Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~ Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? v~ IF ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 ' _ 3 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to § 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any c~~$ssification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Raffles ? ~-- J ~~ DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Description Fair Market Value Si'~~IGr f~ ~C`.5t ~/~Crs .`~~~ C'~t}CChLd 115-t- DATE OF RAFFLE ()Cfi 2~f ~ ~ q~~ If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? ~- r ~ L ,~ NOTE: This permit shall be v id only for the above location. Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. t h e ~ r C« c_ d 5 '{i'~ ~ G ~{ ~~ -r C~ ~ r~ c~c, mac;', I I .hc v sc d h y ~ he i~'l_A ~_v ~U ~'chCSc Schcic, i Su~~-, ~.~ ~} e ~ ~~ . ~~nt C u ~ ~ ~'1-s• l y n p-f-- b ~ d ~ ~ +c~ --Fcr ~ Cc n d ~-(-z~ ~, h c=am c ~ -M-, ~- ~ d v ccrh cr-i D-F- -~ hc. Gf-~ ~ i d rc~,--, ;; :w: COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018 a r K-5 PENN FOREST- CARI~~IVAL. ~ n ~~r_~ . DRAWING ON OCTOBER 9TH AT 2:-30 P.M. 1. RECLINER-$410-Grand Piano 2. SEGA GENESIS VIDEO SYSTEM-$120 Penn Forest PTA and Hill's Dept. Store 3. ERIC FITZPATRICK MARKET SCENE PRINT-$35 Eric Fitzpatrick FRAMING-$100-Country Village Shops 4. 20" BMX BICYCLE-$70 Virginia First Savings Bank 5. LAWN TREATMENT-$60 Green Up Lawn Care MULCH-$60-Mulch'n'More 6. REMOTE CONTROL CAR-$90 Garland Oil Company 7. TWO MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE TICKETS For any show '93-'94 season S30 GIFT CERTIFICATE-Texas Steakhouse 8. $50 SAVINGS BOND-Signet Bank Cave Spring Branch . _ ... 9. ONE YEAR FAMILY MEMBERSHIP-$45 Imaginasium 10. FALL WREATH-$50-Salem Creek 11. KOOSH BASKETBALL SET-$18.75 Imagination Station NEED NOT BE PRESENT R TO WIN K-S ~~ • 0 Lr F i.. ~c ~ z ~ O ~ z c~ o z m'• .. c •t z o w F ° o~ ~n V +C ! LL s a p ~ i WS cd c ~ La ~- ..c cn m L1C ° V ~ .aG ^ Q CC i O +.t C -~C O i i CJJ S F p... LL ~ ate. O m Lt ~ ~ ~ 2 LL id F O O ° x i+.1 O C ~ m 0 Z¢ D H Z N "'• ..C .~ Ga] C O F O La7 Oa K V t Gn O V a.....L ; r ~ ~- sv ^ C C/a L a~ o o -~ Lr m s ~ "- -- _ c «- o z L~ _ Lv ~ ~ Lai 0 o = F ~ ° x x _ ~ ~ L~ .~ Lr ~ .« r~ ' ~ = s ZF `r ~ L~ z m O~i `-. s s~ = ~ O o o ~a OSLG c.~ ac i s m ~ F+ F ¢ 4 Oa H L D ~ H1 V ~ V p O O ~. . HJ 4 0 O L'J] Lo Z m OG '~ b 0 CG V C i . m O _ o ~ Z a.. ~ as ~ _7C -+ O .ac sic ~[ r ... u~' ^ a ~ , c~ o = L ( ~~ ~c ~ m o b mm° ° •T n y m F _ ~~ i••, S h 0 ~ O ~ F y m ~ ) 6 .mow ~ C C.7 (v 2 W O O ~ • yE ~ ~ i w G.. i~ O ~ i i+ r" F ~ F Lr w o = 0 0 ~ u~ o ~°, ° 0 0 o a .~ ,~ ~;,~ .. , , ~e• an o c n O F ca: o ~ o o La = c ~ y .e F m F o La F ~ b Li' ¢ Ln = O LC L/J w it Q V C p~ ~ tai V Ld N LO ~ i N F i Li' Y. 2 C D w ~ N ~ Z r r b V t V Lio LL' ~ = O. F C M F = i i F O O C Z to h V F Y pG aC ,# G Y Lr F ~ V s Oti V x H O F o s i o ~ i " m ~~ a x 0 ] a c v ~,,,, • s Od W a c La .t . . +C ~ . •S / F 2 V ~ Lya~ Lp = O O O Ln a.a i ~ _ Lq ~ O F V ma ~ °~ _ ..C Ln o H ~ c m m o . Lc ~ ~ •. ~ o m p ~ O m m Ln x v ~ .. LY c~ c~ .ac ea: La _ o Z Ld i y O O F w m V m F S ~ C i OO Z L` ; V +C Z O L9 F Q~ _ i m h w i LC Y'~ a ' y Lsi O +C C ~••' S C F ~C x m O 00 O y V F ° L L1C tC F ! F O i/ O~ Lr O '.C O m O ~' F F ~ La F C F i V O. ° LC LL' W ~ en Z ~ ~ ~ ~ O x O H O o = V ~ °~ ia L ia s W x F V Z LY O x m i o C ~ ~ w fa. LC Ln ~ N t .. ~"" C i 0 4 m m V~ D O ~' N = O :~oxs ~s ' '' o ` ~°i ry,.+e mix. = ° O° m s O ~ ~; 0 Ln s r .. c~ 5 ~ = . m ac m xi .., d .L: ~ y ,,, ~ Y , Ln s ~ F LL' r-. L. Oe ~ i ra ~ ~••~ s La] . O ~„ _ c V1 ~~ O L m d7 O. c •+ ~~ . ~ O C V O V ' O Z Lai OA LC Z m iv O. i L fL ia] h F F LV LY. O] ~ iv F F ~, a""' O ir. a r O V F Lai OC SC O O HO N.. i {ai V OG w YO fs7 ~ t H ia. Yr OG O ~ F= Z F h OC O] i x •-• = Z w Ls: Li+ x F O ~~.. LO Lv w ^ V O +t H O ° m ~ Oi r. ~ .wc _ y ' ' W O d _ . D a. V ~~ i • V . .~ f? LfJ F m LG ia. G. F ~ O OG L? L 7 i F . r_l r / _ O ~ N T ~ C Y> G ^ N Ay ~. ~.. ~. ~ ~ . !V N ~v N f'~l ". NOTARIZATION ~~ MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS: THE FOLLOWING OATH I hereby'~swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as se forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. se of the Code of Virginia and section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. Sign by: r r ~ ~ ~U ~ oC3-~ci~. V ~ Name itle Home Ad ess Zyp~fj Subscribed and sworn before me, this~~~day of 9J~in the ~~~~~ County/~#~ of Virginia. ~ My commission expires: .~~ 19 ~~ Notary Pu lic NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~ y~ Date Y~ Comm' sinner the evenue ~•r' The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE,VA 24018 4 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-7.e OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY WHEREAS, the 50th anniversary of the June 6, 1944 Normandy Invasion known as D-Day was recently recognized in the United States and throughout Europe, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley holds the distinction of having had a major contingent involved in the D-Day invasion, and WHEREAS, there is a need to honor in an appropriate manner the brave men and women from the allied nations who participated in the invasion, and WHEREAS, a memorial honoring the events, people and allied nations related to Omaha Beach and the 116th Infantry would be an attraction in the Roanoke Valley and contribute to the overall economy, and WHEREAS, potential sites throughout the Roanoke Valley for the D-Day Memorial were studied and reviewed in 1990, and WHEREAS, a highly visible site has been identified that would provide access for public viewing of the memorial. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, supports the siting of a National D-Day Memorial, and encourages the completion of this important project. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist Mary Parker, Roanoke City Clerk Forest Jones, Salem City Clerk Carolyn Ross, Vinton Town Clerk Chairman, D-Day Memorial Committee Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Support for National D-Day Memorial COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'8 COMMENTS: ~~c,ocr~rN--Lwcf cy",'~.r~-r~-~ BACRGROiTND For the past four years a local D-Day Memorial group has been planning a National D-Day Memorial to be located in the Roanoke Valley. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1990, Roanoke County staff met a number of times with members of the D-Day Memorial group and toured possible sites for the location of a National D-Day Memorial. Since that time, the group has selected a proposed site near Hotel Roanoke for high visibility and have asked for support in the way of a resolution from local governments. Roanoke County supports the siting of the Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. Many veterans from the Roanoke Valley area served during the June 6, 1944, D-Day invasion of Normandy. A resolution of support is attached. FIBCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution of support for a National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley. K-(~ Respectfully submitted: Approved: oyc W. Waugh Elmer C. Hodg Economic Development Specialist County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~'~ AMENDED COPY AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRTJCTION OF A NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY WHEREAS, the 50th anniversary of the June 6, 1944 Normandy Invasion known as D-Day was recently recognized in the United States and throughout Europe, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley holds the distinction of having had a major contingent involved in the D-Day invasion, and WHEREAS, there is a need to honor in an appropriate manner the brave men and women from the allied nations who participated in the invasion, and WHEREAS, a memorial honoring the events, people and allied nations related to Omaha Beach and the 116th Infantry would be an attraction in the Roanoke Valley and contribute to the overall economy, and WHEREAS, potential sites throughout the Roanoke Valley for the D-Day Memorial were studied and reviewed in 1990, and WHEREAS, a highly visible site has been identified that would provide access for public viewing of the memorial. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, supports the siting of a National D-Day Memorial, and encourages the completion of this important project. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 82394-7.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MALLARD LANE ESTATES INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,- that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Bob L. Johnson Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddv Nays: None A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 82394-7.f requesting acceptance of Mallard Lane Estates into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, August 23, 1994. ~~~~- Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors K-7 NORTH _ _ ~ _ .n II 10.76 Ac i« t ) •~d 1.02 Ac fi~~ ^ « ~/ ~~~i 10 ,~ , t. a = 1.64Ac ^4 .h .. h 9 8 . T . . s. s . l Id ,~ .. r x ~ 8 •. itss •' .e ~ t 02 AC i717 2 f7/! ~ ~ 6 • t' "I y- i ~ S 3 s p// ! rl.. r I 2 ~ `~ i~l 7 S4 `OO , t 3.OtSAc •'Ij 2.67AC s7~• R !d s 0 M~Ilard 101 Loke ~ _e+0 T' ., ., ~ y ~ \ '~ 6 9, i7ss i7so 14 fig- a ~ \ i6l \ ' J \ ~ ~ 0 13 re ~ t.StAC 13 14 s 16 ~ c c29Ac 12 t.70AC 7 a 2.03AC 1.3 AC ~ JO ~ II R^ 20 1676 r i71! T.01 Ac re L23 Ac _ .. _ ._ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) From the intersection with Mallard Lake Drive (Route 1250) (north) to the cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) 0.16 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 26 FEET SERVICE: (1) 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ,ACCEPTANCE OF 0.16 MILES OF MALLARD KALE COURT ENGINEERING & INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT .OF TRANSPORTATION INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT SECONDARY SYSTEM ' 4 O -~ti r~ H z ~ w rn M N O A H A H z a F r~ r O 0 a O w FTr O O D t"~ O U a~ x 0 GI ro 0 FG ~. ,~ ~I W v x Cd a b F+ c~3 ~--a H ro '" z o W o U C/1 w U O O W H ~. z z ~~ G~ O < U <~ O 0 z 0 v .-. ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ a O ~, b ro rr ~ M ,.C .. o ~ ~ a a a •rl 3 N -, O z o a ~" a O v 1-i N A A e ''~ +~ ~ O U d d ~ i E+ U v Q! R3 .. m A A A ~ ' M E-~ V) ~ 1"~ '~ ~ .'~ ~ p r~ 'd O p 'd O p C H ~ H Ca ~ O O p O O O v O U ~. Ri a. ~ a. W x m a ~ h ~ o a ~ a H a ~ H v, w E• a r v x ro m a ~. O b ~, ro z ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ m m .~ ~. b b a m a C3 ti 0 .~ Ci O m m d m A v~, m m .'~ V m W .ti 1•~ 0 O~ ,~ 0 b b d p m 0 z K-'7 m 0 p ad .d V b w G ~ O • r-I d ~ U N ~ a v ~ b H ~~~++ ~ U +3 ~ ° "~ o y ~ a~ ~ v o H a ''~ ~ ~ ~ d w 00 W ~ b ~ o U k ~ O d ~' v u v :: . .r., ~ Q a ~ ~ .-. O U O ~ U H ~ b ~ ~ o o g ;~ a H ~ 8 z 5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of 0.16 miles of Mallard Lake Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Townside Construction Company, Incorporated, the developer of Mallard Lake Estates, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.16 miles of Mallard Lake Court Staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No County funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board approve a Resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept 0.16 miles of Mallard Lake Court into the Secondary Road System. i~ ~ APPROVED BY: C` Arnold Covey,\Directo Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Insp ctions County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 2 K-7 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 23rd day of August, 1994, adopted the following: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5 (a) , fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5 (A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, resolution be forwarded to the Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: that a certified copy of this Resident engineer for the Virginia A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk 3 rr) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,1994 RESOLUTION 82394-7.Q REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR REVIEW OF BASIC CABLE RATE FILINGS BY BOOTHE AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's "Certification of Franchising Authority to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates .," F.C.C. Form 328, was filed with the Federal Communication Commission on October 12, 1993, and on October 26, 1993, this Board adopted Ordinance 102693-4 establishing "Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates ."; and WHEREAS, by certified letter dated November 1, 1993, received on November 2, 1993, Boothe American Co. d/b/a Salem Cable TV was formally notified of the receipt by the F.C.C. of the County's Form 328 and the Board's adoption of the aforesaid Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on July 20, 1994, the County of Roanoke received completed F.C.C. Forms 1200, 1205 and 1220 from Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV as required for regulation and approval of basic cable service rates which Forms will be forwarded to the offices of Moss & Barnett, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for their audit, review and report to this Board on the reasonableness of Salem Cable TV's rate request; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of Salem, Virginia adopted an ordinance governing the procedures and standards for the regulation of cable television rates pursuant to the rules of the Federal Communications Commission and the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and has previously submitted an F.C.C. Form 328 in order to be certified to regulate basic cable service rates within its jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, the F.C.C.'s "Report and Order on Rate Regulation" authorizes a franchising authority to extend for up to 90 days, or 150 days in the case of a "cost of service" rate justification filing, the effective date of proposed basic cable service rates to permit the authority to make a final determination on the information submitted by the cable operator. To toll the effective date of the proposed rates, the franchising authority must issue a brief order or resolution explaining that it needs additional time to review the proposed rates; and WHEREAS, notice must be provided to the cable operator within 30 days of receipt of their Forms 1200 and 1220 of this 90 day and 150 day extension and the County Attorney's Office mailed to Boothe American Company d/b/a as Salem Cable TV on August 17, 1994, by certified mail, return receipt requested, such a letter of notification. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV as set forth in the F.C.C. Forms 1200 and 1205 received by the County of Roanoke on July 20, 1994, is hereby extended for 90 additional days in order to obtain and review additional information from Boothe American Company as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 2. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Boothe American Company 2 d/b/a Salem Cable TV as set forth in the F.C.C. Form 1220 received by the County of Roanoke on July 20, 1994, is hereby extended for 150 additional days in order to obtain and review additional information from Boothe American Company as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 3. That the letter of notice mailed to Boothe American Company from the Office of the County Attorney on August 17, 1994, is hereby ratified and affirmed by this Board as authorized by this Board of Supervisors, as the franchising authority for cable operators in Roanoke County, as tolling the effective date for the basic cable service rates submitted on July 20, 1994, for an additional 90 and 150 days, respectively. If no action be taken by this Board within this additional time period, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. This resolution shall be effective from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yn~.~~ ;-4/. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Anne Marie Green, Cable TV Negotiating Committee Harry C. Nickens, Chairman, Cable TV Committee Salem Cable TV Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER '~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of resolution for extension of time for review of basic cable rate filings by Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~ ~ ,~:~ti~( ~'`.~ ~ ~~.~ BACKGROUND' The City of Salem has recently initiated the exercise of its authority to regulate basic cable service rates as was done by the County of Roanoke last year. Now it may be possible for the County and the City to coordinate their efforts in order to exercise the authority granted to them under the 1992 Cable Act. During the first round of rate review authorized by the F.C.C., there was little justification for the County to undertake this expensive process when its subscribers constituted less than one-third of the total customers of the Salem Cable TV franchise. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On July 20, 1994, the County Attorney's Office received a package from Boothe American Company, d/b/a Salem Cable TV, containing F.C.C. Forms 1200 and 1205 which are now to be used to determine the reasonableness of basic cable services and cable equipment and installation charges on or after May 15, 1994. The F.C.C. current rate regulation order permits a franchising authority to extend the effective date for these rates for an additional 90 days to ensure that the cable operator's rates are within the Commission's reasonableness standard. Additionally, Boothe American Company has filed an F.C.C. Form 1220 on behalf of Salem Cable TV in order to enable it to justify its rates for these basic cable services on a "cost of service" methodology. In reviewing this form, the F.C.C. permits the franchising authority to extend the review period for an additional 150 days. K-g To extend this period for rate review, notice must be given to the cable system within 30 days of the receipt of these forms. On August 17, 1994, the County Attorney's Office mailed to Boothe American Company, by certified mail, return receipt requested, notice of the extension for 90 days and 150 days, respectively, of the effective date of their proposed rates. The County must take action on the proposed rates within this extension period. If no action is taken, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. FISCAL IMPACT' No additional impact on County finances beyond the attorney's fees previously estimated. Any fiscal impact would involve rates for cable customers within the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the resolution ratifying the action of the County Attorney's Office in notifying Boothe American Company, of an extension for 90 and 150 days, respectively, of the effective date of basic cable rates to permit additional information to be obtained from the cable operator, if necessary, and full review of their rate figures. Respectfully submitted, ~~•A.~ Jo ph B Obenshain Se or Assistant County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens K-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,1994 RESOLUTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR REVIEW OF BASIC CABLE RATE FILINGS BY BOOTHE AMERICAN COMPANY D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's "Certification of Franchising Authority to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates .," F.C.C. Form 328, was filed with the Federal Communication Commission on October 12, 1993, and on October 26, 1993, this Board adopted Ordinance 102693-4 establishing "Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates ."; and WHEREAS, by certified letter dated November 1, 1993, received on November 2, 1993, Boothe American Co. d/b/a Salem Cable TV was formally notified of the receipt by the F.C.C. of the County's Form 328 and the Board's adoption of the aforesaid Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on July 20, 1994, the County of Roanoke received completed F.C.C. Forms 1200, 1205 and 1220 from Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV as required for regulation and approval of basic cable service rates which Forms will be forwarded to the offices of Moss & Barnett, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for their audit, review and report to this Board on the reasonableness of Salem Cable TV's rate request; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of Salem, Virginia adopted an ordinance governing the procedures and standards for the regulation of cable television rates pursuant to the rules of the Federal Communications Commission and the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and has K-B previously submitted an F.C.C. Form 328 in order to be certified to regulate basic cable service rates within its jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, the F.C.C.'s "Report and Order on Rate Regulation" authorizes a franchising authority to extend for up to 90 days, or 150 days in the case of a "cost of service" rate justification filing, the effective date of proposed basic cable service rates to permit the authority to make a final determination on the information submitted by the cable operator. To toll the effective date of the proposed rates, the franchising authority must issue a brief order or resolution explaining that it needs additional time to review the proposed rates; and WHEREAS, notice must be provided to the cable operator within 30 days of receipt of their Forms 1200 and 1220 of this 90 day and 150 day extension and the County Attorney's Office mailed to Boothe American Company d/b/a as Salem Cable TV on August 17, 1994, by certified mail, return receipt requested, such a letter of notification. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Boothe American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV as set forth in the F.C.C. Forms 1200 and 1205 received by the County of Roanoke on July 20, 1994, is hereby extended for 90 additional days in order to obtain and review additional information from Boothe American Company as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 2. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Boothe American Company 2 K-~ d/b/a Salem Cable TV as set forth in the F.C.C. Form 1220 received by the County of Roanoke on July 20, 1994, is hereby extended for 150 additional days in order to obtain and review additional information from Boothe American Company as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 3. That the letter of notice mailed to Boothe American Company from the Office of the County Attorney on August 17, 1994, is hereby ratified and affirmed by this Board as authorized by this Board of Supervisors, as the franchising authority for cable operators in Roanoke County, as tolling the effective date for the basic cable service rates submitted on July 20, 1994, for an additional 90 and 150 days, respectively. If no action be taken by this Board within this additional time period, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. This resolution shall be effective from the date of its adoption. ~' `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-7.h REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR REVIEW OF BASIC CABLE RATE FILINGS BY COX CABLE ROANOKE, INC. WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's "Certification of Franchising Authority to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates . , " F.C.C. Form 328, was filed with the Federal Communication Commission on October 12, 1993, and on October 26, 1993, this Board adopted Ordinance 102693-4 establishing "Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates ."; and WHEREAS, by certified letter dated November 1, 1993, received on November 2, 1993, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. was formally notified of the receipt by the F.C.C. of the County's Form 328 and the Board's adoption of the aforesaid Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 1994, the County of Roanoke received completed F.C.C. Forms 1200, "Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services", 1205 "Equipment Form" and 1215 "A La Carte Channel Offerings" from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. as required for regulation and approval of basic cable service rates. These forms will be forwarded to the offices of Moss & Barnett, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for their audit, review and report to this Board on the reasonableness of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc.'s rate request; and WHEREAS, the F.C.C.'s "Report and Order on Rate Regulation" authorizes a franchising authority to extend for up to 90 days the effective date of proposed basic cable service rates to permit the authority to make a final determination on the information submitted by the cable operator. To toll the effective date of the proposed rates, the franchising authority must issue a brief order or resolution explaining that it needs additional time to review the proposed rates; and WHEREAS, notice must be provided to the cable operator within 30 days of receipt of their Form 1200 of this 90 day extension. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. , as set forth in the F.C.C. Forms 1200, 1205 and 1215 received by the County of Roanoke on August 12, 1994, is hereby extended for 90 additional days in order to adequately review these rates with the assistance of outside legal counsel and, if necessary, to obtain additional information from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 2. That the County Attorney is authorized, on behalf of this Board of Supervisors as the franchising authority for cable operators in the County of Roanoke, to give notice by letter to Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. that the effective date for approval of the basic cable service rates to become effective July 14, 1994 is extended for an additional 90 days. If no action be taken by this Board within this additional time period, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. 3. This resolution shall be effective from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 2 A COPY TESTE: /b` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Anne Marie Green, Cable TV Committee Harry C, Nickens, Chairman, Cable TV Committee Cox Cable TV Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney ACTION # ITEM NUMBER /\ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of resolution for extension of time for review of basic cable rate filings by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' This Spring, the County of Roanoke, in concert with the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, undertook its responsibilities afforded by the 1992 Cable Act to review the basic cable service rates for Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. In March 1994, in the midst of that process, the F.C.C. announced a new series of rules applicable to rate regulation of basic cable services. The County of Roanoke has just received from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., as of August 12th, the information required by new F.C.C. Forms 1200, 1205 and 1215. Upon receipt of these forms, it is contemplated that the detailed information provided by Cox Cable will be forwarded to our special counsel, Moss & Barnett, for review. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As with the initial round of rate regulation, the F.C.C. regulations grant a franchising authority 30 days from receipt of the cable companies rate justification forms (Forms 1200 & 1205) to complete its review of the cable system's rate structure. The F.C.C.'s second round of rate regulation rules atill permit a franchising authority to extend the effective date for these rates for an additional 90 days to ensure that the cable operator's rates are within the Commission's reasonableness standard. To extend this period for rate review, notice must be given to the cable system within 30 days of the receipt of the Form 1200/1205, which was August 12, 1994. The County Attorney's Office requests authorization to continue the employment of outside expert legal counsel to review this latest rate information, within the budget previously approved, and to notify Cox Cable of the extension for 90 days of the effective date of their proposed rates. The County K-9 must take action on the proposed rates within this additional 90- day period. If no action is taken, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. FISCAL IMPACT' No additional impact on County finances beyond the attorney's fees previously estimated. Any fiscal impact would involve rates for cable customers within the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the resolution authorizing an extension for 90 days of the effective date of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc.'s basic cable rates submitted by F.C.C. Forms 1200 and 1205 to permit full review of their rate figures and to permit additional information to be obtained from the cable operator, if necessary. Respectfully submitted, J ph Obenshain S for A sistant County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~ t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR REVIEW OF BASIC CABLE RATE FILINGS BY COX CABLE ROANOKE, INC. WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's "Certification of Franchising Authority to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates " ., F.C.C. Form 328, was filed with the Federal Communication Commission on October 12, 1993, and on October 26, 1993, this Board adopted Ordinance 102693-4 establishing "Procedures and Standards for the Regulation of Cable Television Rates ."; and WHEREAS, by certified letter dated November 1, 1993, received on November 2, 1993, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. was formally notified of the receipt by the F.C.C. of the County's Form 328 and the Board's adoption of the aforesaid Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 1994, the County of Roanoke received completed F.C.C. Forms 1200, "Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable Services", 1205 "Equipment Form" and 1215 "A La Carte Channel Offerings" from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. as required for regulation and approval of basic cable service rates. These forms will be forwarded to the offices of Moss & Barnett, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, for their audit, review and report to this Board on the reasonableness of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc.'s rate request; and WHEREAS, the F.C.C.'s "Report and Order on Rate Regulation" authorizes a franchising authority to extend for up to 90 days the effective date of proposed basic cable service rates to K-5 permit the authority to make a final determination on the information submitted by the cable operator. To toll the effective date of the proposed rates, the franchising authority must issue a brief order or resolution explaining that it needs additional time to review the proposed rates; and WHEREAS, notice must be provided to the cable operator within 30 days of receipt of their Form 1200 of this 90 day extension. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That the initial 30 day period for the review of the proposed basic cable service rates of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. , as set forth in the F.C.C. Forms 1200, 1205 and 1215 received by the County of Roanoke on August 12, 1994, is hereby extended for 90 additional days in order to adequately review these rates with the assistance of outside legal counsel and, if necessary, to obtain additional information from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. as to the justification for its rate request. This action is being taken to ensure that the proposed rate is within the reasonableness standard established by the Federal Communications Commission in its "Report and Order on Rate Regulation." 2. That the County Attorney is authorized, on behalf of this Board of Supervisors as the franchising authority for cable operators in the County of Roanoke, to give notice by letter to Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. that the effective date for approval of the basic cable service rates to become effective July 14, 1994 is extended for an additional 90 days. If no action be taken by this Board within this additional time period, the proposed rates will go into effect, subject to subsequent refund orders. 3. This resolution shall be effective from the date of its adoption. 2 ACTION # 82394 - 7i ITEM NUMBER /~'~ 1Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : J~:^~" ~' e %' /' ^, SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION The Developers of Webber Subdivision, Granville & Virginia Webber, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Jack Bess entitled Webber Subdivision, dated February 20, 1990, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $6,300.00. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Webber subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~~_ i n SUBMITTED BY: Gary R ertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Johnson to approve No YXs Abs Denied ( ) Staff recommendation Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred Kohinke Minnix X to Nickens X cc: File Gary Robertson Arnold Covey u• ` ACTION # 82394 - _~ ITEM NUMBER "~ ~ / MEETING DATE: August 23,, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend Appro va/ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County School Board serves as the fiscal agent for the Tech Prep Consortium comprised of the school divisions of Bedford County, Botetourt County, Craig County, Franklin County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem City; and Virginia Western Community College. An additional grant has been awarded to the consortium to assist with administrative costs, specifically to be applied to the salary of the consortium director. The grant is for a two-year period: $40,000 for FY 1995 and $40,000 for FY 1996. The school board is requesting an appropriation of $40,000 for FY 1995. The grant of $40,000 for FY 1996 will be included in the 1995-96 budget. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of the $40,000 to the School Grant Fund. V_V Garland Kidd Director of Vocational & Adult Education ACTION t ~~ ~M,lf~ CYO;' Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator Approved (X) Motion by: Johnson to Eddy Denied ( ) approve appropriation Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred ( ) Minnix To Nickens cc: File Garland Kidd Dr. Deanna Gordon Diane Hyatt VOTE No Yes Abs X X X X X k- FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON AUGUST 11, 1994 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR THE TECH PREP CONSORTIUM. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Education has awarded the Tech Prep Consortium (comprised of the school divisions of Bedford County, Botetourt County, Craig County, Franklin County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem City; and Virginia Western Community College) an additional grant of $40,000 for a two-year period to assist with administrative costs, specifically to be applied to the salary of the consortium director; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded, requests that $40,000 be appropriated by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the School Grant Fund for Fiscal Year 1995 to be applied to administrative expenditures of the Tech Prep Consortium. Adopted by the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TEST Clerk c : Mrs . Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge ACTION N0. 82394 7k ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING THE ROANOKERD OUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Cave Spring Elementary School P.T.A. has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on October 15, 1994. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended thaw schoollPcTtA~nbeoapproved a Permit from the Cave Spring Element y SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: .~ ~~~ ~~- Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator -----------------------ACTION ------------ VOTE Johnson No Yes Abs Approved (X) Motion by: Eddy X Denied ( ) Johnson X Received ( ) Kohinke X Referred ( ) Minnix X To ( ) Nickens X cc: File Bingo/Raffle File FLE PERMIT APPLICATION ~~ a RAF K Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization (~aU~ 5~1~ ~~9 E~e~e^~^,~ ~~ Mailing Address 5ya~ .1~or~naJQ,~n ~~~e S~ City, State, Zip Code ~oa~ ake ~ °7 X01 ~ When was the organization founded? / ~i !v Purpose and Type of Organization .^„; ,;; ; c' s~ti oo ~ Dart ~~ i a,a ch er f~ssoc - 8as the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES ~ NO_ Is the organization non-profit? YES '~ NO Is the organization exempt under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES / NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked aad any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~_ Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~ ._ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 TO NOTARIZATION. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-7.1 OF APPRECIATION FOR BRINGING THE TAERWONDO AMERICA NATIONAL TOURNAMENT TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament will be held in Roanoke County on Saturday, September 24, 1994, at Cave Spring High School; and WHEREAS, this event, located here by Robert J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of TaeKwonDo America, and owner of TaeKwonDo America Karate School in Roanoke County, is expected to bring over 1,000 competitors and spectators to the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, part of the proceeds of the competition will be donated to the Roanoke Rescue Mission; and WHEREAS, TaeKwonDo teaches discipline, self-defense, control and physical fitness to students of all ages, promoting confidence and well-being for the participants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its appreciation to ROBERT J. LACY, Chairman of the Board of TaeKwonDo America, for bringing the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the participants in the upcoming Tournament. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Resolutions of Appreciation Steven A. McGraw, Clerk of Circuit Court Robert Lacy, American TaeKwondo American Karate School /~'-/.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ROBERT J. LACY, FOR BRINGING THE TAERWONDO AMERICA NATIONAL TOURNAMENT TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the TaeKwonDo American National Tournament will be held in Roanoke County on Saturday, September 24, 1994, at Cave Spring High School; and WHEREAS, this event, located here by Robert J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of TaeKwonDo America, and owner of TaeKwonDo America Karate School in Roanoke County, is expected to bring over 1,000 competitors and spectators to the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, part of the proceeds of the competition will be donated to the Roanoke Rescue Mission; and WHEREAS, TaeKwonDo teaches discipline, self-defense, control and physical fitness to students of all ages, promoting confidence and well-being for the participants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its appreciation to ROBERT J. LACY, Chairman of the Board of TaeKwonDo America, for bringing the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the participants in the upcoming Tournament. ~iiiuii~~~~~iui~iiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiuiiiuiiiuiiu~ii~iiuiii~i~~u~iiiiiiiiiiui~i~iii~~i~i~iiiiii~~~iiiiiiiiiiiuii~~~~~~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ __ APPE . CE REQUEST G ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ PUBLIC HEARIN ~ _ -_ ~ - ~ ,,~ ~ -_ SUBJECT: ~~~.c._=~ / iG.,~~C-~ ~~ ~ f ` l~l,~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ; r ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND AD;~R.I:SS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ol~the Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ vnth the clerk. -_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ = - - = fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiitiiRl N-I County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Unaudited) Balance at August 23, 1994 Amount 4 625 355 of General Fund Expenditures 5.4% 4 625 355 Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 5.4% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). m:\finance\common\board\genera1.95 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIlZGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -July 1994 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $4,925,244.57 Payroll: 7/01/94 7/15/94 7/29/94 $ 626,259.81 575,123.56 559,593.09 1,760.976.46 $6,686,221.03 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~,c.Q,~..~ ~~. i~a-ra,~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke - - - Minnix - - - Nickens - - - ACTION NO. /~/ ITEM NUMBER /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) , a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment C) . FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~` , , ~ j J hn M. Chambliss, Jr.~ 1~~ Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,500,000 S 770,715.82 PROJECT COORDINATOR: SPENCER W1TTS ACCOUNT CODE: 104030 COMMENTS: °~ Phase I construction activities are on schedule and will be completed by August 15. Wall finishes and carpeting are 90X complete in this area. Lighting has been installed and HVAC systems are nearing completion. Phase II construction also remains on schedule. Phase II is scheduled for completion by September 1. Nindows have been installed and wall board installation is nearly complete. Exterior masonry work will be completed by the first week of August, except for the finishing of soffits and the coating of fens - both of which should be completed by August 22. Preliminary work on the main parking area is progressing on schedule. Curbing should be installed by August 12, and the crushed stone base and paving should begin the following week. Phase III demolition activities were initiated ahead of schedule for work areas of the old building. Staff vacated these areas in mid-July. Asbestos abatement work was completed in the last week of July. Our plans continue to call for an interim operation to be set up in Phase I and II areas during September while Phase III renovation takes place. BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 ~V -5 DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLOSEOUT BUDGET CONTRACT S 2,750,000 EXPENDITURES TO DATE $ 4,939.50 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104040 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP SELECT PLANNED CONSULTANT L ACTUA PRELIMINARY PLANNED ............ ><>~ ........... ........ ~~<~>< ............ ~>~<~<~~~~> ENGINEERING ACTUAL . PREPARE NNED PLA .:::::::::.. ........... ........... ........... CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ACTUAL ADVERTISE PLANNED FOR BIDS ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL SUBSTANTIAL PLANNED COMPLETION ACTUAL PROJECT PLANNED CLOSEOUT ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: The feasibility study is complete. 2 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DR/FENWICK DR BUDGET S 90,000 CONTRACT PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH 110RKlIAI1 EXPENDITURES TO DATE ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 N-5 COMMENTS: Mattern & Craig will be designing the early warning system. 3 ~S BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY BUDGET 5 75,000 CONTRACT S 97,500 EXPENDITURES TO DATE 522,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORIOIAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 COMMENTS: 1. Phase I Murray Run below F 8 W building (Upstream from Phase II) 2. Phase II trunk line along Colony Lane and drainage easement. 3. Phase I - 57,500 from F & W and 515,000 from Drainage Budget Phase II - 575,000 from Bond 4. P-120 to be constructed with Phase II. Plans are currently being reviewed by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 .-- BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 75,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH HORgU-N ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 COMMENTS: We are in the process of speaking with the area citizens to gain their permission to access their property. 5 ~(- 5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 DRAINAGE PROJECTS - WOLFE CREEK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 50,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BUTCH YORKMAN ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP SELECT PLANNED SURVEYING FIRM ACTUAL ACTUAL SURVEY PLANNED (AERIAL) ACTUAL DESIGN PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH VDOT PLANNED ACTUAL MEET WITH PLANNED CITIZENS ACTUAL PRE-BID PLANNED CONFERENCE (BID) ACTUAL AWARD CONTRACT PLANNED ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: 1. No permanent easements needed. 2. VDOT participation at crossing of creek on Stoneridge Circle. 6 ns BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 300,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: GEORGE SIMPSON ACCOUNT CODE: 104050 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP RFP PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES UAL AC SELECT ANNED Pl CONSULTANT ACTUAL PRELIMINARY PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL PREPARE PLANNED WATERSHED PLANS ACTUAL REGIONAL PLANNED POLICY ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED INVESTIGATION ACTUAL REMEDIAL PROJ. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Request for proposal is complete. We are awaiting official confirmation of grant approval from FEMA. 7 ~y-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104204, 104210, 104212 104205, 104207 N FNr11MRFRFD EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 62,000 BALL BASE 2 :::::::::::: :::::::::::. :::::::::::: ::::::::.... ..:..:.::::. :::::::::. ~ `' ` FIELDS ACTUAL 24, 866 #;k`~IG::: ::::~1!Il~>::: <::::k'~ICs:: ::::t~II~>::: :::::EEISs t ... >':l~ft ............ ............. • C~tF ............ VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 25,000 T L OM U I R STRO E CTUAL 0 ........... ::~IG1:: ............ :~71G: ...... <~~N~i'. ~1G::: M~~.:: 1~~`> 1 ::. :..........: VINYARD PARK I PLANNED 50,000 :.:. .... :_~IG#: .. :~tlG >~;B.i~ ?;~t~Ql~:.:. .:::...,..... LIGHT BASEBALL ACTUAL 0 ::>::>::» >``~!IG:: ~»:>::<EE' ::>~li~:: ~::»>~:::> ?:>RI~E: D PARK I VINYAR PLANNED 25 000 , ~fl~~~ ~~}#~I: :;:~:~f.„ ,:;Ct:,:: ~pl# ION ONCESS C >:::: STORAGE ACTUAL 0 :::k`~I~a::: ::::k~II'a:.:. .::1#~:: :. I::. .::I.. <:;:I::: ::'::I~I3 :: ::: ........ ........... MT. PLEASANT PLANNED 40,000 ;~#IG> ~1 L ARK BAL P FIELD CTUAL 458 <~IG> ......... ~#-~» ............ `;':113:::; ......,.,,,,. .. '~Ir~, ............. . ~'!4~< ............ ;~N~: ......:.:..,. :: ~1 ..:::. ... «:::..:.. ::.::::::::: ............ :.s:;;~.~z ::::::::::::. ............. ~~4s :.::::::::::: .......,,,.. COMMENTS: Vinyard Park -Construction of the two baseball fields and parking is nearing completion. Mt. Pleasant Park -Contract for construction has been awarded. 8 N-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104207, 104211, 104206, 104213, 104202 u FNCLIMBERED EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP WHISPERING PLANNED 60,000 ............ :~ll~ ...... l~t~~> ~~~ :GQi~ .:. (`: ..:.......... PINES -LIGHT "~"~`"'> '~$~~~ BALLFIELD ACTUAL 0 > WHISPERING PLANNED 25,000 INES - P RESTROOM UT 1 L CTUAL 0 i€I~~t# H;i~[ ~t:: ~< ::1~;1~ ... »N~1k ............ '~fH>1Y ............. ... WHISPERING PLANNED 36,000 ;:<~<:;?E~i:~: ~!$ - NNIS TE PINES ~ '' BASKETBALL CT ACTUAL 0 :::::kflC::::: ::::F:SIG::::: :::E11.G..::::: :::::F;SIG:::: '::<~f1Cs::::: :::>pl6:E::: :::: ~1i ..::. ............. '.« #ix... ............ ... ..........:.. GARST Mlll PK PLANNED 124,000 BALL GHT 2 LI FIELDS CTUAL 82 ::::stn::;: 1 z % H#f :1:.; . :::::::::.. .:::::..:.. WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 50,000 AREA PURCHASE LAND ACTUAL 0 WINDSOR HILLS PLANNED 62,000 :irlliG; ~i.lt`': AREA - 2 BALL FIELDS ACTUAL 0 TOTAL PLANNED 357,000 ACTUAL 982 COMMENTS: Whispering Pines Park -The construction contract has been awarded. This work includes a new baseball field and a combination basketball/tennis court. 9 pY-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 1,750,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: JOHN CHAMBLISS ACCOUNT CODE: 104202, 104214, 104218, 104220, 104219, 104221, 104216 w c FAIT IIMRFRFD EXPENSES TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP STARKEY PARK PLANNED 25,000 k'~1G :F~l~e ':~~~: ? ::I ::. > .::.......... L OM UT STRO RE CTUAL 0 ?I~ . E11~:: .. ::1?1~;. >fll~ : X11 ..... ~`~' ............. .~ ...........: TENNIS COURT PLANNED 210,400 ~`~f10~~ ONS OVATI REN CTUAL ,000 :~Illi>:: ::~IIE~::::: :::>~~:':: :>~11~ :.: :........... ;'#~. ..:~....... ..$.~... ....~ .. BALL FIELD PLANNED 62,000 ............ ~1l~€€€ ............. i~~~~1 NG F NCI E TUAL ,400 >::>::>::»:::::> ::~iD :>::;:>::;::::::: ::;~~#T:: >:<;:::::::<:::>:: ~ii-;> <:::::::>::>:::>:: 'E:t?Ill~::; ::E::::.;:.;:.;;:. :E1~41~ :.:::.;:.;:.: %E:t?IM# ::. :~ .:........... . zl'Sfli.. ............. ~~>< .. . ............ Ali:>: ............ FACILITY PLANNED 11,000 REPAIRS LEISURE ARTS ACTUAL 0 :1~#~:< >I~E>E<: ~> .. G` » ............. 1~"?~» ............ ADA ACCESS PLANNED 15,100 >GE31f ACTUAL 736 GROUND COVER PLANNED 42,000 :>#COit< Y- PLA FOR GROUND EQUIP. CTUAL 0,102 .........::: <:BAR::::: ::.:.....::. :::;:Rid:~: ::.......... ::~:~~t~' .......... ;;C411~# ;;Gl1lE<> ;;[ ;;a~l€ .'< >CX11E .:: rfll~.. ::.......... .. ............ TOTAL PLANNED 365,500 ACTUAL 53,238 COMMENTS: Tennis Court Renovations -Bids are being received for tennis court repairs. Ball Field Fencing - The bid has been awarded; the schedule has been prioritized; and work has begun. Ground cover materials for use around play apparatus have been bid and will be installed by County staff. 10 ~~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 ROAD PROJECTS BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 500,000 S 500,000.00 S 1,000,000 PROJECT COORDINATOR: ARNOLD COVEY ACCOUNT CODE: 104070 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP VDOT PLANNED ADVERTISES ACTUAL VDOT AWARDS PLANNED CONTRACT ON ALL PROJECTS (57) ACTUAL ALL PROJECTS PLANNED CONSTRUCTED 8 COMPLETED ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: All plant mix projects completed except Sierra Drive which will be completed this coming spring (1994). Incidental projects (4 projects) -Deed preparation has been completed for Ridgelea Road. Documents have yet to be signed by property owners. VDOT is working on the deed preparation on Willow Branch Road, Eveningwood Lane and Cove Road. VDOT plans to begin construction on all projects this coming fall or spring of 1995. 71 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 VALLEY TECHPARK BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 750,000 S 674,000.00 PROJECT COORDINATOR: BRIAN T. DUNCAN ACCOUNT CODE: ry- 5 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN fE6 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MASTER PLAN PLANNED ACTUAL LAND PLANNED ACQUISITION/ EXCHANGE ACTUAL DETAIL PLANNED ENGINEERING ACTUAL INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ACCESS REQUEST ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNED ............ BIDS ACTUAL AD ART RO ST ANNED P UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL COMMENTS: Dixon Contracting has completed construction of the stormwater management facility and extension of the water and sewer lines. VDOT~s contractor, Adams/Thomas Brothers, projects that the road will be completed near the end of September to mid- October. Other than weather, the only delay to date involved Thomas Brothers putting a hole in the sewer line. The staff is working towards developing a landscaping plan for the park. 12 ~~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B August 23, 1994 PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET CONTRACT EXPENDITURES TO DATE S 750,000 S 240,121.01 PROJECT COORDINATORS: JOHN CHAMBLISS AND HOMER DUFF ACCOUNT CODE: 155140 TASK 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 BUDGET OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP PURCHASE OF PLANNED 750,000 LAND ACTUAL 240,121 TOTAL PLANNED 750,000 ACTUAL 240,121 COMMENTS: 13 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment C August 23 , 1994 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Fields /' /~ Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center -Replace Lights FIRE HYDRANTS: All fire hydrants have been installed. N W M ~- ~ N a OO O M M M O h m n M M E ro O ro d' n 11+ '" N M o n ~ n M o a ~.. tD 1n A W N N N M N O Ie N N n M 0 r n ^ n ~ N n ~ M n n n n ~ ~ M d: N N ~'; ~.. . ~;, n n M ~ a ~ m d' N n~ ' O tD ao N a O N M N N C M ri' '" d' N t0 ~ O M lt) O O M o ~ O l0 e r a O w n 1n ~ M K ~ n [0 ~ O ~t O N a M N to N 1!I M l0 to 0 0 O : ~'~ N M N O ~ ~,~ ~t l0 m N O ~ of m M N n M l7 Iff ~ N~~ O O O M N m r O .- W M O O N o O CC N N V ~ 11) N N N W`:: M N N Q m N m r M l0 m m eD z ;'; N '< Q Z: N M N M 111 1n m N n l M ~ N M O N ~ n c0 'c} N '" m a0 V ~ N ~' a 111 j ~ N m M 11) to O O N o O O O M ~~ O d 111 et (7 ~ ~ ~ O N c0 ~ N n ~ O~ ~ Q Z a ~ M~ tD ~ n n M n N N n m O ~! M M M ~ n 1n O O O O O n M l0 tt j V V' ~ lD o ~ n O O ~ a O Y O M 111 a O ~ m p n 00 1D U W ~ N ~ O ~ n N ~ CC eYl'. U n m N .- O n m m 00 M N a N d' a a m N V n M ~ O N M o0 d' O N O O N o O M M ~ o ~ " N p:W ^ ~ M M N N a M 0 O O N O N (D N n to r 00 O m n O d U N O ID M W N m 00 M In m Q 1n O m m ' N a M 1p O M N M O N n M O N N N eo N M 111 O O t0 o ~ O n N M a ~ ~ O m ' M V '" 1n n O M B r . O N.:; H' M M M O O 00 N N M m '7 m m et ro J ' I C ~ Z .- tD M V n llf M M N .- 1n N N N !fl O O O a W tf 1 111 O 1n O N O O M o O N .- a o ~ i I M O v a to a M .- 1t N o ~ N N d v o tc .- o ui ~ co ~ n i ~ F.. < W ~ ~i Cl 0 . ~'..:. Y.' 117 n ~T m N 00 n et lD m N M N 111 a0 f0 N to to O N M l0 ~- V ~ cD N l0 a O N O O~ o ~ O N ~ N o ~ 11? ~ O 0.:. .- ~ ~ ~ M 117 In N O O M O ~ N f` N _ ~ O ~... O ~ ~ O ~ 71 7 ~ lA O (0 N n C X ~: Q W J F U ;< {-' O m In a m .- ~ M i n to O M ~ O N t!) 111 O M M N a ~ N !b M n .- M 1D fG n O O m M 00 p ~- N O O N a O V O a o i " a j ~ Z 7Z d aaco rim oo vo uiv o~ ~ _ oa ~~ ~ °~ ~ w mason 1na~n Mam ann lnmm lnrom nmN oono .-lnoa ~< n lD M .- t} c{ N ~ N M~ ~ N a O eT ~ to 1q N N .- u7 M O O ^ to Z " .- N O ~ (D .- l0 .- tD N n <0 n (G ~ J o L ~ x_ u d.. n ~ ~ n c0 00 M fD N '- m 1n 0 0 0 l0 to M ~ M n n n l0 O O '- o a M n o ((] 111 ~ ~ N r M M N ~ ~ O ~" ' O ~ V U ~ . M f0 V O O M V c0 lD l17 N om ~ ,, d to N N Q V :. :'. j..I C (D O m 7A ~ ~ d' M to td 1D V N CO n fD a v n 1[7 N V O O m o O O 7n o W . ~ . to M N 1D m .- 1p M ~ Q O M ~ st a ~ ~ N .- m O M ~j N O O O . .. . . Q ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ lq .- N N f0 ID O 7 U° ~ L ~~ co m 111 N n ~ of a 1(7 d' M O O N N E v ~- M t0 N M N (O ~ fD .~- N t0 ao < ~ O n to M O ri O O N o O m '- N o ~ O 0, ~; N n L ~ ~ y. - w ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ W W w R w W ~ M~ ~ ~ p ~~ W =~a>= ~u V U T~ia3 xmm ~ z ~ Q~ rng VJ : i 1-. m w Y OC V W ~i jf ~j ~ V_ fL (C i ~ wF ~ Z. r0 ~ lD ~1D ~ v7 " U7¢ ~ ~ O : .~ 4~..w o ~ '7 Ft` iL' Ca ~ ~ ~ f-N ¢ O fJ .Z Gi O ~~ ~ w ¢ it ~w Uw ~ d ~~ ¢ ~w y U r r rn ~ ~ m y 7- rn Z ~ , w u1 iu ~ ~ U !uy 'y > ?, m w > ~ m cr w c~ ~ m x a a ~3 a o xw ~ a a O ~ ~? -~ z ~ ¢ 's Q ~ c?: z z ':z z O ~ u 4 a W ° ~ ~ o O m ~ ~,. 1L~/ ~/yy~ ~~ a cr: ~ w ' a p w U ~a z G1 W a ° W U Q~ V W o.vra ' 4~.d ~ R~ OvsGV i~ V J V Z ~ ¢ Ilt ¢ R Zt7. CG V 2 ~ OO~w Z fL OZ ~ ~D2 ~ ¢ O 2 Z ffiO2 0. G. o. ~~ „i ~~ W+S W ~+ ~_~'OC OQQ Q W ~ J J 1 J ~* H Q C7 w F- d LLt F- O _ w ~- O w ~: O OCi AY`. OG lM ~ "~ ~ A.^ C) pwp '~ U O ~ 4~~~~ QU wa ~ ~ z ~u :° ~ t~a~r p ~~o tra~~o O O O O O a w W 7 2 ¢N 3 w ` ` ¢~n O ~: aa ` ` a~n " ,~ : w q ~/ y : =~ 1 1i -. 1 ii ? '~ 'a' `.?+' ~ ~ ~ ? ~ O R O ~ -~ 1-. r-. r.. n. r. . rc rc O<c. ~ z tQ r~ .. y ~ r~ _~ a: rr~<m ~ x' rl: wE.:!K Rc K ~.;2 h.'~ . , ~¢ "_ z ~.. UC..I G W Z Q U; LL ~_ C r L Q LL N- ~ 9 °u N N J E a N .~ m N E e 0 m d C O a } ': O r N m m m m 0 N N O N n a M O w N n a m N M m M a n a m O M M M W r N a O N N o M a r m l[1 m o O a n N !~:;. . a tG m a n N N N r M 1n r a N N N r fD ~ r n r N n r M a0 n ro n n r C M r : O M r N M M M ~ N O 00 tD W O M M O M lf1 N a s 1D CO N r .- ~ O n N M r n m r N M I r a r~ r O O r o r 0 f0 a N o O U) m Z~ r N N 0 r M N m r a N a O O zo >~ m n 00 n N m N (0 n a a M a O a u7 N M m N N a a O O 00 o O N n o M O CC W' O N r N C~1 M M O r~ O r C1 M O N ¢7 n r M M W O r N r n ~" r r F O z M nicao mmmn Mmn Mmm o0o aar nmN nr7po araa° a N a N N O O O O r O a a m n o m ~ N Q~ a N Cl r a 0 r tD a N O~ N fD 1 az . W _ ~ a <D N M 1n M O O a n N M t0 r m M a N OD r n N r (D n O O M o O N to 0 `1 Y N N M M O M m r LL7 O to ~ M r N O a Oa W N O M r r W O O M N m N ~~ N O U ~ ~ U' 0o mmron mMNb afDO tnnm a(Om ara nNr OOmo .-rODo Z 1n O M 0 N to M r N O O N r N O M M D' ~ M N r N OD r m r a m w m m m ~ D a U r n M 1n O r 1!) N a a m m M M n 1!) W m M n m r m O O M a' N a to 0 M M r to c0 M O N O 1n M M a N M a N uI 1n O d a r 0 M .- ~~ {~. ~ N a M 0 ~ 00 r fO N N a m m n m N O.W.. lL J Z O to N Mtn O M M n O O O N a r O O O M a a O a a O O N o 1D r M o N N E N N r a a s O N M M M a r m M t0 (O n Z ~ W Z m a O Y N m a m O m M N M OO N (D m m N a m a N M m m m ~ O O a o O r t0 0 O N .- '- N a r nj O N ~ N N M r r O 1!) Ln r .- O O N a O r .- O ~ ~ O ~ tD O 1n m n 2 a w a U• E- n r (p N m m m tp N r op m 1n n m O W N O 1D r n N N O O /D a M N N o ~„~ Z r r N O N lq to N M N N ~ r M a 0 ~ O ~ r n Z. a N M M O N O M m N r a 0 O O r f0 Q ~ o.a. ~ W a m m n n a 10 m N r N n YD a O to N N M 1n a N M O O n o a N n o ~' l0 l0 M m M e} r M N N M M r M 0 a ~.j O In M N M N a M O 117 .- m N z.: N N N O r l0 r (p m N m n n n J r J x a a r n m n m m n r M n o 0 o M M n a m a man o o r o r n a r r O N M M O r r 111 a N~ a u7 M O ~7 r 10 NaNr 1D tH ra aM ^^a a f' a; U; M maoaN rm O mf0m ON1f7 1Onm mfOM nM00 OOm~ Mrao W~ tt) a N n O M a M r 0117 r N~ M r N M N M r N r N O N n r Q.. ~:'. r r r r v r ~ ui .- n ¢i n ac n U`d` ~ , Z...F N ram M M m r N r N M M m oo r Mao 07 r N 1p m n to r a a° oo M m 3° p r r rN aM„~r r r as r ^ Nr NaM r u1 N 1n rtc ~.. a N M 00 r n N a m 00 ro m m O O , V ~ U W. H 2 V W w 113 Q (A ~_ ~ w Z ~a w ~ ! ~ lei.[ W W o ft ~ `V ~ W z W ~z` ~ M. 2 2. ~ ~-~ ~,wW 1^1uw =~~ o ~v V v1 r 2~w rm r 1=~ ~ y Ca,g v>~ ~ ~ a ~~' a~ W ~LL ~ ¢ ° n x J a ~ o ~ y ~ ~ ~ qua z w az v ~ ~ >o c ~ G' Q U Q w Y S U ~ rn y Y 2n S Z rn y: Y rn S~ u1 W w U~ 'm J A '~ : } m to D ~ T CY W C3 ~ N Q b 4 j d d J LR ~ .J :,~ J Ck © V1 V/ cA »i fJ ~ ., O ~ Ci ).' ~W y„~~ 0~~~ QdO Qom`-Z QQ'Q Q~~ Q:4YQ tuu~ ~m4t ~'. tll Q~: C? Vi ~"' Q ~ ¢ w ¢ ct Zu xV >2 Z w ~w U 2 to Gf 2 W c3 2: W lS 2 iu ~ :a a J <Cr oC ~ U. »r U ~. ::~ ~ . 1 ~ J 1 J ao ~ ~ Q G' rr:D~ ltl '~' rt: o z W molt lif ~? scs~ tlf ~" ni~i€n . ' i~a ~w*f 1 W ~I~xAC l11 ~ ' ~ ...t 4 .H Q 4 ~ d KU CCQ ~t oh F- :a g W ~Ud ~ ~ ,~~ ~ 0. fY. C [4 U p ~~~L ' ~ - ~ { ~~ 7 F F - f -l - - - A O D : ~ ~0 s ~ .., ~ ~~ ~ . . ~. 9 ~ S ~ . O ~:B F ~ D ~ F O ~ ~ U Z ¢ s 2 ~ Z ~ 2 ~ .:..~ ~d.~d K '~,. 2 ~~2q "- ~ M.'~'.' Q vJ Cw G W Z W ~_ Z U Q ~..~..~ H z we G Q a LL C n/-~ O N N d d c c v L A 9 E E 0 v h vi 7 E a N .~ m N E 0 .q m z 'm N C 0 a x 72 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ©' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Private SSE/R Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approve/ of the proposed changes. They are sensib/e, measurab/e, and easy for homeowners to understand. Testing wi// be much quicker, making it possib/e to begin repairs soonei This is a much better approach than the present method. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program was started in July 1986. At this time work was confined to making repairs to the public portions of the sewer lines. During this phase it became apparent that a significant portion of the infiltration/inflow into the County system comes from the private portion of the sewer system (i.e. from the lateral at the right-of-way to the house). On September 17, 1993 the Board of Supervisors voted to amend Section 18 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the Roanoke County Code to allow for enforcing the elimination of stormwater inflow and infiltration from private property. The code as amended based surcharges for non-compliance on the amount of stormwater that could enter the sanitary sewer system. Although this method is excellent in principal, the staff has found it difficult to place realistic numbers on these flows without going to the expense of placing flow meters in each lateral. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Below are the results of the Penn Forest inspections limited to drainage on Tanglewood Drive and at the Intersection of Meadowlark Road. ~_I During this procedure one property owner that refused access to his property was taken to court. The court determined that Roanoke County's procedure was proper in this case, but because there was evidence to suggest that this specific property did not have a problem, the court determined that an inspection was not necessary. As of June 20, 1994 the following has been accomplished: Total number of properties effected by survey 524 Notification letters sent to homeowner 357 68.1 Authorization received from homeowner 342 65.3$ Cleanouts in place 371 70.8$ Internal/External inspections completed 340 64.9$ Dye injection test completed 296 56.5$ Properties completed 294 56.1$ Properties completed with problems noted 115 39.1 Additional properties with problems noted but incomplete at this time 23 Problems found are as follows in order of impact on the County's sewer system: (Note: The most critical defects are not necessarily the most expensive to repair. For instance, a sump pump that discharges to the sewer would routinely have the most impact because of the large quantities of water they move, however, in most cases they can be corrected by relatively simple piping changes. (1) 8 sump pumps for foundation drainage to sewer. (2) 22 buildings with connections of subgrade drainage to floor drains. (3) 34 buildings have cracks and evidence of inflow (heavy stains) of ground waters through walls/floors to drain. (4) 1 building was positive on dye injection test for drainage to sewer other than visible problems noted. (5) 1 surface drainage to sewer. (6) 28 buildings have cracks/slight stains in walls/floors. (7) 11 buildings with possible water flow under door to drains. ~... I (8) 2 buildings with sump pump discharge to surface but overflow to sewer. (9) 2 sheared laterals at foundation due to settling. (10) 9 buildings with failed joints in sewer lateral. (11) 23 buildings with problems noted by homeowners comments only. (These items may be higher in severity but can not be verified by staff). The above mentioned I/I sources would cause surcharging of the sewer line and sewer backup in low areas during moderate to heavy rainfall under saturated conditions. Long term surcharging and backup would occur during flooding periods. PROPOSED CHANGES: Because of the difficulty in placing realisti flow quantities on the defects, the staff recommends changing th surcharge to be based on a category of defect rather than flo Below is a chart categorizing the proposed changes I Direct connections (inflow) to the sewer of sump pumps (including overflows), holes in floor drains, downspouts, foundation drains, and other direct sources of inflow (including but not limited to visible evidence of ground/surfac water entering drains thr doors or cracks in floors and walls as noted during field inspections by the Roanoke County Utility Department II Leaking or sheared lateral and any other sources of infiltration as noted during field in- spections by the Roanoke County Utility Dept. Six months to repair. If not repaired, $100 per month until repaired. Six months to repair. If not repaired, $50 per month until repaired. ~_ 1 III Potential or minor defect that do not adversely the sanitary sewer system at the present time. Voluntary repair. County reserves right to continue to monitor defect Customer to be notified if condition changes Attached is a copy of the proposed changes to the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed changes to the ordinance be adopted following second reading. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~Gar~ertson, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens b-1 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE SEWER ORDINANCE (d) Prohibited toxic materials include, but are not limited to: (1) Herbicides. (2) Fungicides. (3) Pesticides. Sec. 18-155. Discharge of garbage. (a) No person may discharge garbage into public sewers, unless it is shredded to a degree that all particles can be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers. Particles greater than one-half inch in any dimension are prohibited. (b) The a~}~=e~~ control authority shall have the right to review and approve the installation and operation of any garbage grinder equipped with a motor of three-fourths horsepower (0.76 hp metric) or greater. Sec. 18-156. Discharge of storm water and other unpolluted drainage. (a) No person shall discharge into public sanitary sewers: (1) Unpolluted storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage. (2) Other unpolluted drainage. (b) The control authority shall designate storm sewers and other watercourses into which unpolluted drainage described in subsection (a) of this section may be discharged. 1 v-~ Sec. 18-156.1. Purpose It is the policy of this County and the purpose of this ordinance to establish a separate procedure for the enforcement of the Sewer Use Standards (Article IV of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code) arising from the actual or potential illegal discharge of unpolluted stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage into the public sanitary sewer system. The inflow or infiltration of stormwater into the public sewer system constitutes a direct threat to public health, safety and welfare, since this discharge or infiltration overloads the public sewer system, thereby causing sewer overflows and sewer backups into homes and businesses. This discharge or infiltration increases the cost and expense to all sewer users and all County citizens, since the overloads to the sewer system result in higher operating costs at the regional sewage treatment plant and higher capital costs for expansions of the public sewer system. Sec. 18-156.2. Determination by Utility Director. (a) The Utility Director, or his designee, shall be vested with the authority and responsibility to enforce the provisions of this ordinance and to make determinations with respect to the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, inflow or infiltration of stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface drainage into the public sanitary sewer system. (b) A determination with respect to an actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, inflow or infiltration of stormwater, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff or subsurface 2 D-1 drainage into the public sanitary sewer system from the property of a sewer user or any other person shall be based upon the following categories vZ iaaa iv~~ „-~rT-c~iTnra~e-^v~irca~-~ei~te~3-+~e~ ~„ ",} ; }„ va ; ,..c, .. F., l 1 e~i~~e.Tt'L[A~icu~G1 n..~ .>>-.. ~~ aauaauui ~-~c~ir3~e-e~g~r~• } ~~1-~~--s-i~e~-ggee~f~-e-~a~-r~ l r 1 ~e--Qa-~re~~e~a~~- ~6-cire-~e~cn-~ .. , ,.+., , .. , (c) The Utility Director, or his designee, shall provide written notice by certified mail to the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person of any violation of this ordinance or of Section 18-156 of this Code. This notice shall describe the nature of the violation, t-li~~e}~-~i-n-~r~~a=-tn~~;~~r the corrective measures necessary to achieve compliance, the time period for compliance, the amount of the monthly surcharge until corrected, and the appeal process. Sec. 18-156.3. Surcharge; disconnection (a) For structures or property with actual or potential F • , ~ a- • .a, a ~. a ~- L,,, a discharge , r~v~TO~acc'~rnmz'cca-c6-s~~--ziz-ei~E•`~'9'--vr 3_ o-r considered to be a Category I defect, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be given six months to correct the illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the illegal or improper discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 18-156.2(c). then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of ~-A~6 100 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible party fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. During and after periods of heavy rainfall resulting in actual or potential inflow or infiltration in excess of 200 gallons per day, the Utility Director may in his discretion temporarily terminate the sewer connection to protect the public sewer system and other sewer users. (b) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge i~~r~r-a-~i-e~e~-i-~€~e~e~~-~Ted~e~e-l-e~s~~~~ s~i~a-~~se~er -j-c*'~~; considered to be a Category II defect, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be 4 D-~ given six months to correct the actual or potential illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration or inflow into .the public sanitary sewer system. If corrective measures to eliminate the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, infiltration or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system are not completed and approved by the Utility Director, or his designee, within six months from the date of the notice provided in Sec. 18-156.2(c), then the County shall impose upon the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person a monthly surcharge in the amount of ~~-9 50 per month until the required corrective measures are completed and approved. If the property owner or responsible party fails to pay the monthly surcharge when due and payable, then the County shall terminate the water and sewer connections and service to the property, and disconnect the customer from the system. During and after periods of heavy rainfall resulting in actual or potential inflow or infiltration in excess of 200 gallons per day, the Utility Director may in his discretion temporarily terminate the sewer connection to protect the public sewer system and other sewer users. (c) For structures or property with actual or potential discharge considered to be a Category III defect, the sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall be notified of the results of the inspection Repairs of these defects will be considered voluntary at this time. Properties with Cateaory III defects will continue to be monitored and if the Utility Director, or his designee determine that the condition changes, the 5 D-~ responsible person shall be so notified. ; i ~~ ~ ~s r- ~rr 3~-~-6i vi~ i -fi 6 ' "• } •• ~ 7' e6i~-~~ e ~i~k~--~e- 3~~ , r se - c r ~ z va ~} fi ~ =~ ~e--a~ ~~e~-ge~e~ ~ ~ e~a- e - b~ ~a~e~ - ~~ e~a , ~e--~ te~- ~ , ~* '~a e~~ e-~ -~e- e~~-- -e~aa3~ tt ~e ~ r w ~ ~ ; ~~e~ i-~-S e^ ~8-3 ~~6-~{ e3- ~o~- e ~=o~r~-a ~ e r~e o e~re ~e~ r re-Ee ,,,,.. ~~,~ -~s ~ y~ ~ "I - ~ L a-r , ~ ~' 'e'- ~'e'A1 } •• F C` C A eLTre ~'~1'1'SSA"Se-~'e' ~ :Te'e'~CI1Z"" T~Tr V p . I ~ I T F ~ ~ ~ ~ ab -~ t-~i e~-- t-li ~ ~~ ~ L'Z TG-ZSTe ra~g e tre-a~ e-~a re~-- ~ r ' ' } ~ ~ = z ~ -8.8-- a3-~e ~- „ , ~~., +.,~,. ~re~ TTY ~ , ~ ~. a- e , r i ,~ ~ -e~~eee o ~~ Te ~~ ~ ~ ~ee r~~ -- g ~e~~-i- l ~ra~e- fie ' e.,~~ ee ~i ~ ~.e~ -rn ~ e e .~,• , ,, ~,,,,. ~,,. } ,,,, ~ , ., r~--nt h Pr 4 A ~a~r ~e 6~e~ ~- e-~ e9i~ee -6i~- ~6 e ~ ~ ~ ° ; , } ~' ~ } i ~l- ; te~ --u ~ i~e~ -~e- be~--~ es~ t-~i~ Z~ o s eh~ ~ , r~ ems. e~--ez ~ D-I s a~-~a~~e~e~-~ys~e~l~e~e~~=~-~~~~e~ ~es~6i3s3 ~~e--~ei~S~9 ~., .. i i ~., a ~~ox~zcr6S-~6 G6i~l~@, +. ~ t~, .. _ ; i i ,.,.... i eiL-i~tt~i~6~eic-~'T~Et~u'~3~~-es-6 ~ ~ i ~ } ~ ~ ,,. ; t.,, , ~ ; .,, ,.~ +- ,. ~ u. „ a ; „ ,.~..., ,,. a~aaui y ~ ~ • • , ~ ,. R, i -~~-rare-a~Et6i3i~~6~-~~-~e6 ~- u. ~. ; i a- ti, .. ,.~ ., a ..3. ; se~a~~e-~e--~~re-p~e~ d~ee~re~~~t~~-eu~t~m~re~e Sec. 18-156.4. Review of Corrective Measures The sewer user, property owner or other responsible person shall correct the actual or potential illegal or improper activities or facilities contributing to the discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. These corrective measures to eliminate the actual or potential illegal or improper discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sewer system shall be taken upon notice from the Utility Director or his designee. Once these corrective measures have been implemented, the sewer user, property owner, or other responsible 7 n-~ person shall request in writing that the Utility Director or his designee inspect the corrective measures to verify compliance with this chapter. Any monthly surcharge imposed by the provisions of this ordinance, or any termination of water and sewer service arising from a failure to pay the monthly surcharge, shall continue until the Utility Director or his designee determines that the corrective measures are in compliance with the provisions of this chapter. If water and sewer services have been terminated under this ordinance, the sewer user, property owner, or other responsible person may request resumption of water and sewer service as follows: (1) By taking the corrective measures specified in the notice, and by eliminating the actual or potential discharge, infiltration, or inflow into the public sanitary sewer system. (2) By requesting an inspection and determination by the Utility Director or his designee as provided in this section. (3) By submitting a written request to the Utility Director requesting reinstatement of public water and sewer services and verifying that all standards of this chapter have been satisfied. Sec. 18-156.5. Appeals (a) Any sewer user, property owner, or responsible person may appeal a determination of the Utility Director or his designee by submitting a Notice of Appeal to the County Administrator within fourteen (14) days from the receipt of the written notice as provided in §18.1-156.2(c). 8 o-i (b) The County Administrator shall conduct a hearing on this appeal within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this Notice of Appeal. The County Administrator shall render a decision with five (5) business days of the date of the hearing. (c) The Notice of Appeal shall state the technical grounds and objections for the appeal. At the hearing the County Administrator shall hear and investigate any objection that may be raised and take such action as may be appropriate under the facts and circumstances established. (d) The sewer user, property owner, or other responsible person may appeal the decision of the County Administrator to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by submitting to the Clerk of the Board a written Notice of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of the County Administrator's written decision. This Notice of Appeal shall state the grounds for the appeal. (e) In all other respects the substantive and procedural requirements for this appeal shall comply with the provisions of § 15.1- 9 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, AIIGIIST 23, 1994 RESOLIITION CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-8 CERTIFYING EBECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: i~GZ~..~~ ~ , Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File -/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE 82304-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4925 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 87.11-3-4) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JOHN A. HALL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 2, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate, as described herein, and located at 4925 Starkey Road, (Tax Map Number 87.11-3-4) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of John A. Hall. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Virginia Secondary Highway Route No. 904 (formerly Virginia Highway Route No. 419) 205.15 feet in a northwesterly direction from the northwest corner of the intersection of the said Route 904 and Virginia Secondary Highway Route No. 753; thence leaving the westerly side of Route 904 and with the line of the Andrews-Pitzer-Butler Fuel Oil Corporation, S. 84 deg. 46' W. 316.84 feet to an iron pin corner; thence continuing with the Andrews-Pitzer-Butler Fuel Oil Corporation property, S. 12 deg. 01' W. 75.4 feet to a point on Virginia Secondary Highway Route 753; thence with the same, N. 83 deg. 25' W. 72.7 feet to an iron pin on the east right-of-way line of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company's right-of-way; thence with the same, the following three courses and distances, N. 12 deg. 01' E. 75.0 feet, N. 8 deg. 40' E. 199.0 feet N. 7 deg. 40 E. 166.95 feet to a corner; thence N. 84 deg. 46' E. 294.29 feet to a point in the westerly right-of-way line of the said Route 904; thence with the same, the following five courses and distances, S. 1 deg. 00' E. 35.96 feet; S. 13 deg. 41' E. 79.0 feet; N. 84 deg. 46' E. 4.5 feet; S. 15 deg. 02' E. 32.55 feet to a concrete highway monument; S. 16 deg. 49' E. 100.00 feet to the place of beginning, and containing 2.00 acres, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `~ ~ . Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney s.i PETITIONER: JOHN A. HALL CASE NUMBER: 22-8/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 2, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 23, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of John A. Hall to rezone 2.0 acres from I-2 to C-2 to operate a garden center located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired as to why the site has been difficult to market for industrial use. Staff commented that according to the Economic Development Department, the site has been marketed to potential industrial users without success due to the small size of the tract. The Commission asked about the fence at the front of the property. Rick Payne, representing petitioner, responded by saying that the fence will remain at the front of the property for security purposes. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt expressed concern with changing this property from industrial because the County has such a limited amount of industrial land; however, Starkey Road is a readily accessible commercial area. He moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carved with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other _ .,,,:~ Terrance Harrington, Sec ary S-I STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: JOHN A. HALL CASE NUMBER: 22-8/94 PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: AUGUST 2, 1994 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ,s an uncorlcl~tior~i~1 requesf to rezone a ~ ~crepa~~el firorr~ 12 lrtdusfrial to G2 B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of John A. Hall to rezone 2.0 acres from I-2 to C-2 to operate a garden center located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. The petitioner plans no changes to the existing buildings on-site nor to the location of the three existing entrances. The sale of this property from John A. Hall to Mulch 'N More and the subsequent garden center operation is contingent upon approval of this request. Prior to the adoption of the 1992 zoning maps, the tract was designated M-1. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Garden centers are permitted by right in C-2. Use and design standards include the creation of a 10 foot wide planting strip adjacent to any public street right-of-way. Within the strip, one large deciduous or evergreen tree or small deciduous tree shall be planted every 30 linear feet. Also, the storage and/or display of goods and materials in the planting strip is prohibited. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before issuance of a building permit. S-! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4925 STARKEY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 87.11-3-4) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JOHN A. HALL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 2, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate, as described herein, and located at 4925 Starkey Road, (Tax Map Number 87.11-3-4) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of John A. Hall. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Virginia Secondary Highway Route No. 904 (formerly Virginia Highway Route No. 419) 205.15 feet in a northwesterly direction from the northwest corner of the intersection of the said Route 904 and Virginia Secondary S-I Highway Route No. 753; thence leaving the westerly side of Route 904 and with the line of the Andrews-Pitzer-Butler Fuel Oil Corporation, S. 84 deg. 46' W. 316.84 feet to an iron pin corner; thence continuing with the Andrews-Pitzer-Butler Fuel Oil Corporation property, S. 12 deg. 01' W. 75.4 feet to a point on Virginia Secondary Highway Route 753; thence with the same, N. 83 deg. 25' W. 72.7 feet to an iron pin on the east right-of-way line of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company's right-of-way; thence with the same, the following three courses and distances, N. 12 deg. O1' E. 75.0 feet, N. 8 deg. 40' E. 199.0 feet N. 7 deg. 40 E. 166.95 feet to a corner; thence N. 84 deg. 46' E. 294.29 feet to a point in the westerly right-of-way line of the said Route 904; thence with the same, the following five courses and distances, S. 1 deg. 00' E. 35.96 feet; S. 13 deg. 41' E. 79.0 feet; N. 84 deg. 46' E. 4.5 feet; S. 15 deg. 02' E. 32.55 feet to a concrete highway monument; S. 16 deg. 49' E. 100.00 feet to the place of beginning, and containing 2.00 acres, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning/hall.jn s J I ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE 82394-10 AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT ONLY OF INDIVIDUALLY-SITED SINGLE-WIDE MANUFACTURED HOMES THROUGHOUT ROANOKE COUNTY WITH A NEWER SINGLE-WIDE MOBILE HOME WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 2, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support this amendment to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 30, (Appendix A of the Code) "Zoning Ordinance" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: SEC. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures, or Land. (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming Class B or Class C manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six 1 months may be replaced with a Class A or Class B manufactured home provided: (1) The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; (2) The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the district setback regulations for principal structures, and; (3) The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-9 (L) b., and c.. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J`~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John Birckhead, Director of Real Estate Assessments 2 . s-~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 27-8/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 2, 1994 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 23, 1994 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to receive public comments on amending the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow replacement only of individually sited single wide manufactured (mobile) homes throughout Roanoke County with a newer single wide mobile home. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mabel Hartman said that she is concerned that her existing trailer is unsafe and she cannot afford to replace it with a double wide home. She said her present unit is not wired adequately for an air conditioner. Warren Vestal, a representative from Oakwood Mobile Homes, stated there are a lot of people in the County that cannot afford a double wide. He said this ordinance would not increase the number of single wide units in the County. James LaPrad, son of Mrs. Hartman, said that he owns the land around the mobile home. He said that she should be allowed to upgrade the trailer. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt expressed concern with the equity issue; why not allow them anywhere in residential areas, not just to replace an existing unit. Staff said that this ordinance addresses the situation of the existing 380 nonconforming units; there are families living in the units and the units are getting older. The Commission discussed the issues of timing and location. Mr. Ross commented that he agrees in allowing the replacement of these units. With regard to location, he said the unit should be placed as close as possible to the existing location. Ms. Hooker concurred and said that it would be in the owners' best interest. The timing issue was discussed but the Commission could not reach an agreement. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross maintained that the timing issue should be at least six months. Mr. Witt insisted that it remain at four months. Mr. Witt moved to amend the ordinance with regard to the issues of timing and location. The timing issue to be set at four months and the unit should be placed as close as possible to the existing location in order to comply with the required setbacks. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the ordinance as amended. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker NAYS: Witt, Robinson ABSENT: None 2 ~" F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Witt expressed concern with the precedent that is being set with regard to the equity issue. Also, he said he would be more comfortable if the ordinance referred to the replacement of pre-1976 units; there would be a basis fo`r the safety and welfare of the people residing in them. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ngton, S etary Roanoke C my Planning Commission County of Roanoke ~", ~ Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum T0: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington DATE: July 28, 1994 RE: An Ordinance to Amend Section 30-23-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow the replacement of legal nonconforming single-wide manufactured homes. Attached to this memo is a proposed ordinance to allow the replacement of legal nonconforming single-wide manufactured homes that exist on individual lots within Roanoke County. If adopted by the Board of Supervisors, owners of legal nonconforming single-wide manufactured homes will be allow to replace their existing units provided the replacement unit meets the standards contained in the ordinance. BACKGROUND Prior to 1986, single-wide manufactured homes were allowed on individual lots in Roanoke County provided the Board of Supervisors issued a separate permit for each unit. These permits were valid for a two year period, and thus required the owner of the manufactured home to repeatedly request approvals for the same unit on the same site. In many cases, this process was fraught with controversy, as surrounding property owners objected to the issuance or reissuance of permits. In addition, a considerable amount of the Board's time was devoted to reviewing these permits. In 1986, the County adopted new manufactured home regulations, the essence of which continue to be in effect today. In summary, these regulations permit double-wide manufactured homes outside of planned subdivisions, prohibit the siting of manufactured homes constructed prior to July 1, 1976, and prohibit the installation of single-wide manufactured homes in the county unless they are located in a manufactured home park, or are installed on a lot accessory to a principal dwelling on the property. (See Sections 30-82-5 through 30-82-10 for a// of the Use and Design Standards for manufactured homes. ) Because single-wide manufactured homes are no longer permitted on individual lots in Roanoke County, those that currently exist do so as legal nonconforming uses. Once a nonconforming use is moved, or destroyed, it loses its nonconforming status. Thus, under our current zoning regulations, a property owner may not replaced asingle-wide unit. Roanoke County currently has approximately 380 single-wide units on individual lots. These represent less than two percent of the County's total housing stock. Because this type of housing unit cannot be replaced, the age of this housing stock is increasing. The proposal before you is the result of a request from a property owner to the Board of Supervisors. This property owner resides in an older single-wide manufactured home. Due to it's age, the unit is experiencing electrical and leakage problems. The owner wishes to replace this unit with a newer single-wide unit but is prohibited from doing so because of its nonconforming status. ~"' If this proposed ordinance is adopted by the Board, the owners of existing units would be allowed to replace their units provided the replacement unit was constructed after July 1, 1976, was installed in accordance with the district setback standards, .and the installation conformed to our skirting, and BOCA anchoring standards. The ordinance does not allow the siting of new single-wide manufactured housing units on a single lot. This ordinance does not currently address two issues related to the replacement of these units. These issues are 11) Timing, and 12) Location. (1) Timin The ordinance does not specify when the replacement unit must be installed on the site. For example, if a single-wide unit is removed from a property in 1994, the ordinance would technically allow the replacement unit to be re-sited at any time. One change to the ordinance that the Commission may wish to consider is the addition of a two year "horizon period", during which a removed unit can be replaced. This type of provision would assist the staff in the administration of the ordinance, and also promote equity between these and other types of nonconforming uses. 12) Location The ordinance requires that the replacement unit comply with district setback requirements, but places no other limitations on its siting. For example, if an existing unit sits on a large acreage tract, the replacement unit could be relocated to any other portion of the tract so long as the new location complied with the minimum setbacks. The chosen new location could be more or less compatible with surrounding properties. The Commission may wish to discuss this issue to determine whether or not other siting criteria are justified to promote neighborhood compatibility. The staff has discussed this issue and has failed to identify any appropriate amendments to the ordinance that could insure that the replacement unit was in a location that most compatible with the surrounding area. County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP ~'~ Director of Planning DATE: August 16, 1994 ~~ RE: Ordinance Permitting the Replacement of Existing Non- conforming Single-wide Manufactured Homes on Individual Lots. The attached ordinance amends Section 30-23-2 of the Zoning Ordinance (Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures, or Land) to permit the replacement of existing single-wide manufactured homes on individual lots of record. This draft ordinance was prepared and reviewed by the Planning Commission at the request of the Board of Supervisors. The Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance on August 2, 1994 and has forwarded it to you with a recommendation of approval. The ordinance allows single-wide manufactured homes of any age to be replaced with a single or double-wide manufactured home constructed after July 1, 1976. The replacement home will need to be sited in approximately the same location on the lot and will need to conform to current setback requirements. Replacement must occur within four months of the removal of the unit replaced. The replacement unit will also need to be anchored in accord with BOLA standards, and be skirted. The staff report to the Commission briefly reviewed the history of Roanoke County's manufactured home regulations as they pertain to single-wide units. As this proposed ordinance addresses only the replacement of existing units, and not the installation of units on new sites, the fundamentals of our manufactured home regulations will not be changed by this amendment. One item not addressed in the proposed ordinance, is the current habitable status of the existing units. The proposed ordinance does not discriminate between single-wide units currently C:\WP51\BOS\SNGL WDE S~ serving as dwelling units, and those which because of their age/condition no longer serve this function. If the Board wishes to limit the applicability of this ordinance to units currently serving as dwelling units, then minor wording changes to the ordinance will be required. Planning Commission review of this type change will not be necessary. C:\WP51\BOS\SNGL WDE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT ONLY OF INDIVIDUALLY-SITE SINGLE-WIDE MANUFACTURED (MOBILE) HOMES THROUGHOUT ROANOKE COUNTY WITH A NEWER SINGLE-WIDE MOBILE HOME WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 26, 1994, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 23, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 2, 1994; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support this amendment to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 30, (Appendix A) "Zoning Ordinance" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: SEC. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures, or Land. (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming Class B or Class C manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record may be replaced with a Class A or Class B manufactured home provided: 1 ~~ (1) The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; (2) The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the district setback regulations for principal structures, and; (3) The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-9 (L) b., and c.. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ZONING/MOBILE.HM 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Capital Improvement Program FY 1995-1999 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~:~,~-~, g~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed CIP (draft) for FY 1995-1999 was submitted for the Board of Supervisors' review and discussion at the June 14 meeting. After an involved discussion of numerous projects submitted, the Board's consensus was that the proposed CIP draft was a proper inventory of the County's capital requirements for the next five years. At that time, the School Board was still developing their capital program. The School Board has adopted their CIP and will submit their projects to the Board of Supervisors during a work session on August 23. At 7:00 p.m. on August 23, 1994 there will be a combined public hearing to secure citizen comments on the County and School's Capital Improvements Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon completion of the public hearing, staff would recommend that the Board adopt the County and School Capital Improvements Program as a long-range financial planning tool to address the capital needs of the community. The CIP document will be updated on a yearly basis as part of the annual budget process and is not considered a portion of the Comprehensive Plan. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, " ~' ~~, .~- Elmer C. Hodge'' County Administrator ~~,~ b ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received O Johnson _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To O Minnix _ Nickens Roanoke Co F ,^ , Z Capital I Augus'X Table of Contents ................... troduction I ............... 1 ............. n Calendar for Possible Fall 1994 Referendum ........ ............... 4 Status of School Board Capital Projects ........... ................ 5 Schools by District .............. oke Count R ................ 7 y oan ................ llment Projections E ................ 8 ........ nro Capital Improvement Plan ..................... ................ 40 South County 41 Cave Spring High School ............... ................ Cave Spring Junior High School .......... ................ 42 Hidden Valley Junior High School ......... ................ 43 Back Creek Elementary ................. .......... ..... 44 Bent Mountain Elementary ............... ................ 45 Cave Spring Elementary ....•••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••46 ClearbrookElementary ....••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••.47 Green Valley Elementary ................ ................ 48 Oak Grove Elementary ................. ................ 49 Penn Forest Elementary ..•.•.•••••••••• ~••••••••••••••.50 North County 51 Northside High School .................. ................ Northside Junior High .................. ................ 52 Burlington Elementary .................. ................ 53 Glen Cove Elementary ................. ................ 54 55 Mason's Cove Elementary ............... ................ Mountain View Elementary .............. .. • • • • • • • • • • .... 56 West County 57 Glenvar High School ................... ................ Glenvar Middle School ................. ................ 58 Fort Lewis Elementary ...•••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••59 Glenvar Elementary ....••••••~•••••••• ••••••••••••••••60 East County 61 William Byrd High School ............... ............... . William Byrd Middle School .............. ................ 62 Herman L. Horn Elementary ...••••••••~• ~••••••••••••••.63 64 Mount Pleasant Elementary ............. ................. Roland E. Cook Elementary ............. ................. 65 66 W. E. Cundiff Elementary .............. ................. Other Buildings 67 Arnold R.Burton ..................... ................. 68 Roanoke County Career Center .......... ................. Various School Buildings ............... ................. 69 Land 70 Recap of Land Needs ................. ................ . Vehicle Replacement 71 School Bus Fleet .................... ................. 72 Maintenance and Warehouse Vehicles ..... ................. Instructional Equipment ................... ................. 73 82 Review of Southwest County Facility Utilization ..... ................. Public School Building Cost ................... ................. 88 WORKSESSION WITH BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND SCHOOL BOARD JULY 26, 1994 BACKGROUND The Board of Supervisors has asked for a work session with the School Board on a Capital Improvement Program, with particular emphasis on the need for a new high school in the Southwest County area, and additional athletic facilities at Northside High School. The Supervisors have also requested funding alternatives, and recommendations concerning a possible bond referendum in November, 1994. This document includes information on school population projections, the physical needs of the various school buildings, and possible capital projects in the form of renovations, additions and new construction. INTRODUCTION The Roanoke County School system faces a variety of current and near-future capital improvement projects to keep school facilities at an acceptable, safe level. The issues include overcrowding, security and safety of students, response to federal and state mandates, maintenance of buildings and grounds, air conditioning, improved athletic facilities, and new technology. The material which is presented here represents a proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1994-2004 for input from the School Board and the Board of Supervisors. Also included is a calendar for a proposed Bond Referendum. The projects which are presented here represent the total anticipated needs for the next ten years. These items still need to be prioritized, and funding sources should be identified. Overcrowdins Overcrowding issues in the various schools are not necessarily due to growth in school-age population; in fact, even with reduction in numbers of students in some schools, the buildings are still at capacity. With reduced student-teacher ratios, computer laboratories, addressing of special education needs within the individual buildings and related technological and educational advances, schools which were adequate when they were built may not serve the same number of students today. Some of these problems can be addressed with re-districting of school attendance areas, while others require additions and new construction in the foreseeable future. Additionally, some areas, particularly Southwest County, have experienced recent growth, and will continue to do so as development in the Cotton Hill area takes place. 1 Land Issues Six of the schools which require renovations or additions will also require additional land for these facilities. That information is included in here also. Teacher Salaries There has been recent discussion concerning how teacher salaries in the Roanoke County School System compare to the national average. While this is not information directly related to a Capital Improvement Program, certainly the cost of keeping salaries competitive must be considered along with the physical needs of the schools. The excellence of our School System has always, and will continue to be, based on a combination of the personnel and the facilities. 3 ~. .~. .. ~. .~. ~z .~ ~~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ iii ~ ~ a 8~8~~~8~8~~8~~g 8 ~~8~$ ~~ ~ooo~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~#~~~ e~ ~ s ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ . ~, 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s 8 x s 8 g ~ ox °~~~~~ g a ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ a a ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 8g~8~~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 8, as p A N ~ ~ ~ o O c ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gssg~~ g g g s~ 8 8 s g g 8, s g s s s s ~~g~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .. .. -~ ~ .. .~.~~ ~ ~ a~ ~~~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~ ~~~~~ g S~ g~ 8 8 S 8 8 8 ~ 8~~ 8 8 SSS~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ <~' ~a~~~~~ ~~ o~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a 8 $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z a ~ ~ ~ u 5 i s ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOLS STUDENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS 1994-2003 The following tables were compiled by Lloyd Parsell (Roanoke County Schools) and Janet Scheid (Roanoke County Planning and Development Department). Organizational structures are based on K-5, 6-8 and 9-12. Calculations were made from projected enrollments as of June 29, 1994, and known projected housing developments as of July 20, 1994. Any housing developments not known by the Planning Department that may be constructed in the next ten years have not been considered. The average projected population growth for Roanoke County was so small (.005) it made such an insignificant difference that we did not factor it in our calculations. Fairfax County Department of Planning conducted a statewide study in 1987 to develop factors for projecting student populations from new housing units. These factors were used in projecting the attached enrollments, and they are as follows: High School Middle School Elementary School Housing Units x .20 Housing Units x .08 Housing Units x .25 The base kindergarten enrollment for 1994-95 is based on actual student registrations as of June 29. If these enrollments are different when school opens, the projections would change accordingly. SE Self-contained special education. 8 CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 490 410 .385 14 1299 1984-85 469 483 383 16 1351 1985-86 483 473 487 12 1455 1986-87 479 482 482 15 1458 1987-88 441 446 465 28 1380 1988-89 395 384 430 36 1245 1989-90 415 382 382 36 1215 1990-91 365 382 362 34 1143 1991-92 399 353 381 36 1169 1992-93 402 382 338 42 1164 1993-94 377 382 389 32 1180 1994-95 40.1 426 379 389 32 16.27 1995-96 406 4.07 432 385''' 32 16.62 1996-97 430 412 413 438 ''32 17.25 1997-98 403 436 418 419 32 1.7.08 1998-99 44.1 409 442 424 32 174$ 1999-2000 435 447 415 448 32 1777 2000-01 433 435 447 415- 32 1762 2001-02 419 433 435 447- 32 1766 2002-03 424 419 433 435' 32 1743 2003-04 394 424 419 433 32 1702_ 1983-1993 -9% *Assumptions 1) 540 new housing units in next 5 years 2) 108 new housing units/year 3) .20 high school children/unit 108 x .20 = 22 children 4) 6 children/year/grade 5) addition of 9th grade 10 HIDDEN VALLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 6 7 8 9 SE T 1983-84 211 246 235 228 24 944 1984-85 173 206 254 241 27 901 1985-86 158 188 212 246 24 828 1986-87 165 166 204 194 28 757 1987-88 154 166 170 186 38 ~ 714 1988-89 164 149 171 175 31 690 1989-90 174 172 153 172 31 702 1990-91 158 172 176 153 45 704 1991-92 199 156 174 164 36 731 1992-93 171 202 173 164 35 745 1993-94 170 184 198 176 40 768 ...1994-95 194 175 191 47 607 1995-96 2.10 194 175 47 626 1996-97 200 210 194 47 651 1997-98 204 200 210 47 661 1'998-99 178 204 200 47 629' 1999-2000 195 178 204 47 624 2000-01 169 195 178 47 .589 2001-02 169 169 195 47 580 2002-03 134 169 169 47 519 2003-04 134 134 169 47 484 1983-1993 -19% *Assumption 1) 9th grade to high school 12 BENT MOUNTAIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 SE T 1983-84 9 14 6 10 3 11 53 1984-85 7 6 13 6 11 3 46 1985-86 12 8 7 12 6 7 52 1986-87 23 4 15 8 5 17 72 1987-88 14 17 6 15 9 6 67 1988-89 14 16 5 12 7 54 1989-90 14 8 12 16 8 58 1990-91 17 15 6 13 16 10 77 1991-92 11 18 13 5 11 16 74 1992-93 8 14 16 13 6 12 69 1993-94 8 12 13 16 17 8 3 77 1994-'95 14 7 9 --, 14 16 16 6 8'2 1995-96 14 14 7 14 16 16 6 87 1996-97 14 14 14 7 14 16_ 6 85 1997-98 14 14 14 14 7 14 6 83 1998-99 14 14 14 14 14 7 6 83 1999-2000 14 14 14 14 14 14 6 90 2000-O1 14 14 14 14 14 '` 14 6 g0 2001-02 15 15 14 14 14 14 -6 92 2002-03 15 15 15 14 14 14 -6 93 2003-04 15 15 15 15 14 14 6 94 1983-1993 +45% 14 CLEARBROOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 15 17 19 15 21 23 23 2 135 1984-85 21 15 15 24 16 20 24 2 137 1985-86 14 20 11 18 23 15 20 2 123 1986-87 20 15 20 13 17 24 14 1 124 1987-88 22 22 15 17 13 15 24 128 1988-89 22 19 19 17 17 11 9 11 125 1989-90 27 19 21 15 15 12 12 121 1990-91 25 30 20 18 14 16 12 135 1991-92 16 26 23 18 18 13 14 128 1992-93 19 15 26 19 17 18 12 126 1993-94 21 18 10 22 17 17 11 116 1994.-95 17 20 19 13- '21 '' 19 ~.~ 124 1995-96 17 17 2-0 19 13 21 15 122 1996-97 17 17 17 20 19 13 15 118 1997-98 17 17 17 17 2Q 19 15 122: 1998-99 17 17 17 17 17 20 ~-5 124 1999-2000 17 17 17 17 17 17 ~,5 117 2000-01 1$ 17 17 17 1T _17 15 118 2001-02 18 18 17 1,7 17 17 15 1.19 200.2-03 18 18 18 17 17 17 15 124 2003-04 18 18 18 18 17 '17 15; 122 1989-1993 -4% 16 OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 SE T 1983-84 76 82 56 74 68 80 9 445 1984-85 81 74 75 58 83 66 11 448 1985-86 81 74 82 69 61 85 6 458 1986-87 78 80 72 90 78 59 1 458 1987-88 83 75 79 72 94 76 4 483 1988-89 85 72 74 76 75 86 7 475 1989-90 90 88 83 79 73 87 5 505 1990-91 83 94 84 82 76 82 2 503 1991-92 80 79 92 86 78 72 4 491 1992-93 80 90 89 98 91 78 8 534 1993-94 78 72 89 94 98 81 14 526 1994-95 77 92 76 92 92 100 14 543 1995-9b 77 77 92 76 92 92 14 52.0 1996-97 78 77 77 92 76 92 14 506 1997-98 78 78 77 77 92 76 14 492 1998-99 79 78 78 77 77 92 14 495 1999-2000 79 79 78 78 77 77 14 482 2000-01 79 79 79 78 78 77 14 484 2001-02 80 79 79 79 78 78 14 487 2002-03 80 80 79 79 79 78 14 489 2003-04 81 80 80 79 79 79 14 492 1983-1993 +18% 18 WEST COUNTY TOTAL 1983-84 1355 1984-85 1363 1985-86 1337 1986-87 1333 1987-88 1329 1988-89 1270 1989-90 1245 1990-91 1262 1991-92 1280 1992-93 1283 1993-94 1270 1994-95 12'62 '' 1995-96 124'1 1996-97 1210 1997-98 1228 1998-99 1221 1999-2000 1185 2000-01 1181 2001-02 1161 2002-03 1157 2003-04 1133 1983-1993 -6% 20 GLENVAR MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 112 147 120 116 114 78 704 1984-85 112 117 162 110 114 106 721 1985-86 100 118 127 143 99 110 697 1986-87 114 112 104 114 138 98 680 1987-88 115 124 103 111 111 137 702 1988-89 99 127 105 111 103 115 660 1989-90 89 92 114 89 105 105 21 615 1990-91 87 95 91 110 98 100 22 603 1991-92 75 95 97 91 105 97 31 591 1992-93 100 74 94 99 90 104 34 595 1993-94 100 102 72 102 95 100 29 600 1994-95 103 95 105 16 319 1995-96 89 103 95 lb 303. 1996-97 106 89 103 16 -298 1997-98 77 106 89 lb 288 1998-99 87 77 106 16 286 1999-2000 S2 86 77 16 261 2000-01 8Q 91 86 lb 273 2001-02 81 80 91 16 268- 2002-03 81 81 80 16 258 2003-04 81 81 81 16 259 1983-1993 -15% 22 GLENVAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 67 57 51 79 71 75 79 7 486 1984-85 54 67 60 54 87 71 79 10 482 1985-86 71 47 65 56 67 80 81 7 474 1986-87 84 58 57 68 55 71 86 13 492 1987-88 68 63 61 56 72 58 68 17 463 1988-89 69 54 63 61 57 75 58 17 454 1989-90 66 68 53 65 69 53 74 16 464 1990-91 82 55 72 58 69 68 50 22 476 1991-92 67 83 54 78 58 68 65 19 492 1992-93 63 67 79 60 77 65 66 19 496 1993-94 64 59 63 72 62 76 69 20 485 1994-95 51 62 64 54 74 60 20 385 1995-96 51 51 62 64 54' 74 20 376 1996-97 51 51 51 62 64 54 20 353 1997-98 51 51 51 51 63 65 20 352 1998-99 52 51 51 51 5`2 63 20 340 1999-2000 52 52 51 51 52 52 20 330 2000-O1 52 52 52 51 51 52 20 330 2001-02 52 52 52 53 52 5'2 -20 333 2002-03 53 52 52 53 '53 52 20 335 2003-04 53 53 52 52 53 53 20 '' 336 1983-1993 -00.2% *Assumption 1) 6th grade to Glenvar Middle School 24 NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 9 10 11 12 SE T 1983-84 320 262 268 9 859 1984-85 343 288 233 10 874 1985-86 366 318 292 8 984 1986-87 312 332 321 8 973 1987-88 292 282 326 10 910 1988-89 321 280 269 12 882 1989-90 267 298 265 7 837 1990-91 300 247 292 6 845 1991-92 265 256 241 41 803 1992-93 259 245 259 48 811 1993-94 244 245 251 68 808 1994-95 225 271 236 227 108 <1067 1995--96 259 225 '271' 236 ' 108 1099 1996-97 263 259 225 271 108 1126 1997-98 263. 263 259 225 lfl8 1118 1998-99 243 263 263 259 108 1136; 1999-2000 225 243 263 263 1fl8 -_ 1102 2000-O1 245 222 243. 263 108 1081 2001-02 257 245 222 243 108 1075 2002-03 228 257 245 222 108 1060 2003-04 234 228 257 245 108 1072 1983-1993 -6% 26 BURLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 48 53 46 58 50 55 68 11 389 1984-85 56 46 52 50 57 55 54 11 381 1985-86 47 56 42 50 53 60 55 8 371 1986-87 49 53 60 43 48 51 57 8 369 1987-88 35 61 45 57 43 47 50 7 345 1988-89 65 40 66 40 58 45 45 10 369 1989-90 54 66 51 69 51 55 47 15 408 1990-91 63 60 64 50 69 48 59 20 433 1991-92 64 58 57 58 49 71 51 13 421 1992-93 56 67 57 56 64 44 73 18 435 1993-94 41 58 68 51 56 63 42 14 393 1994-95 60 45 51 67 50 49' 29 351 1995-96 60 65 50 56 72 55 29 387._. 1996-97 60 60 65 50 56 72 29 392 1997-98 60 60 60 65 50 56 29 380 .1998-99 61 60 60 60 65 50 29 385 1999-2000 61 61 60 60 60 65 29 396 2000-01 61 61 61 60 60 60 29 392 2001-02 62 61 61 61 60 60 29 394 2002-03 62 62 61 61 61 60 29 396 2003-04 62 62 62 61 61 61 29 398 1983-1993 +lo 28 MASON'S COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 36 40 43 33 29 46 44 271 1984-85 35 33 X43 44 37 ~ 30 44 6 272 1985-86 ' 43 42 35 38 41 36 32 4 271 1986-87 36 45 45 34 42 38 34 6 280 1987-88 43 32 43 42 32 43 33 7 275 1988-89 43 41 38 39 41 35 43 19 299 1989-90 44 42 42 39 37 41 33 25 303 1990-91 53 41 38 44 39 40 40 34 329 1991-92 44 55 44 38 38 37 39 29 324 1992-93 47 41 52 28 33 43 36 26 306 1993-94 43 53 32 44 30 34 39 27 302 1994-95 41 43 49 30 42 33 14- 252 1995-96 41 41 43 49 30 42 14 260 1996-97 41 41 41 43 49 30 14 259 1997-98 41 41 41 41 43 49 14 270 199$-99 41 41 41 41 41 43 14 262 1999-20.0(7 42 41 41 41 41 4'3 14 26.3 2000-01 42 42 41 41 41- 41 14 262 2001-02 42 42 42 41 41 41 14 263 2002-03 42 42 42 42 41 41 14 264.. 2003-04 43 42 42 42 41 41 14 265 1983-1993 +11% 30 TOTAL 1983-84 3620 1984-85 3462 1985-86 3500 1986-87 3524 1987-88 3452 1988-89 3386 1989-90 3288 1990-91 3295 1991-92 3301 1992-93 3317 1993-94 3392 1994-95 3424 1995-96 3472 1996-97 3545 1997-98 3614 1998-99 3584 1999-2000 .3537 2000-01 3479 2001-02 3467 2002-03 3459 2003-04 3409 1983-1993 -6% EAST COUNTY/VINTON 32 WILLIAM BYRD MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 7 8 SE T 1983-84 337 362 16 715 1984-85 276 332 27 635 1985-86 288 282 34 604 1986-87 275 297 31 603 1987-88 246 295 29 570 1988-89 242 251 263 42 798 1989-90 215 250 236 57 758 1990-91 209 227 249 62 747 1991-92 240 205 216 57 718 1992-93 260 242 208 63 773 1993-94 281 262 244 61 848 1994.-95- 242 276 264 83 $65 1995-96 250 246 2$0 $'3 859 1996-97 293 252 249 $3 877 1.997-98 260 296 255 83 894 1998-99 268 260 296 83 907. 1999-20.00 292 268 260 $3 90'3 2000-01 253 292 268 83 896 2001-02 233 253 292 83 861 2002-03 233 2.33 253 $3 802 2003-04 234 233 233 $3 783 1988-1993 +6% *Assumptions 1) 45 new housing units in 1995 1) 430 new housing units over 3 years 2) .08 children/unit 2) 143 new housing units/year 3) .08 x 45 = 4 children 3) .08 children/unit 4) 1 student/grade 4) .08 x 430 = 30 children 5) 3 students/grade level/year 34 MOUNT PLEASANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 50 52 48 64 53 67 66 400 1984-85 52 53 54 52 64 54 58 387 1985-86 55 46 48 55 48 67 55 374 1986 46 46 55 41 46 55 49 64 356 1987-88 42 44 55 40 44 51 46 6 328 1988-89 65 41 49 50 43 44 5 297 1989-90 42 60 39 41 48 41 4 275 1990-91 67 41 61 42 40 46 5 302 1991-92 47 68 40 58 43 42 7 305 1992-93 40 47 63 43 58 48 16 315 1993-94 54 51 55 64 49 53 16 342 1994-95 42 54 52 52 b6 `46 ''21 33`3 1995-9b 43' 43 55 53 53 67 '21 33'5' 1996-97 44 44 44 56 54 54 21 317 1997-98 45 45 45 45 57 55 2~. 31'3' 1998-99 45 45 45 45- 45 57 >21 30'3 1999-2000 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 ' 29''1 2000-O1 45 45 45 45 45 '45 21 29>.1 2001-02 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 29'1 2002-03 45 45 45 45 45 45 21 29'.'.1 2003-04 46 45 45 45 45 '45 - 21 292 1988-1993 +15% *Assumptions 1) 105 new housing units 2) 35 new housing units/year/3 years 3) .25 elementary school children/unit 35 x .25 = 8 children 4) 1 child/year/grade 36 W. E. CiTNDIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL K 1 2 3 4 5 6 SE T 1983-84 74 91 83 82 107 98 92 36 663 1984-85 61 77 79 76 77 105 94 28 597 1985-86 74 75 73 75 76 87 103 31 594 1986-87 88 86 65 69 79 76 87 29 579 1987-88 93 103 87 81 75 94 90 13 636 1988-89 83 101 83 89 86 82 8 532 1989-90 92 86 91 97 83 86 6 541 1990-91 93 91 82 100 95 87 8 556 1991-92 81 91 87 84 95 97 16 551 1992-93 79 85 91 83 85 91 19 533 1993-94 68 92 85 100 91 86 14 536 1994-95 56 71 92 77 95 8$ 10 489 1995-96 58 58 73 94 79 '' 97 10 ' 46'9' 1996-97 58 58 58 73 94 79 10 #30 1997-98 58 58 58 58 73 94 i0 40''9 1998-99 58 58 58 58 73 94 10 40`9 1999-2000 59 58 58 58 58 73 10 374 2000-01 59 58 58 58 58 58 10 35`9 2001-02 59 59 58 58 58 58 10 '' 360 2002-03 60 59 59 58 58 58 10 362 2003-04 60 60 59 59 58 58 i0 ' 36'4 1988-1993 +.7% *Assumptions 1) 45 new housing units in 1995 2) .25 elementary school children/unit 3) 2 student/year/grade 45 x .20 = 9 children 38 R a e ^~ b CO a w d ~ 8 ,, ~I ~ •~ O .. ~ ~ ~ ~~ U b O ~Q O O .n V F" QI .O :d 7 G y T C •~ O O Y ,, PL C ~ o C• .Q c7 . o a N N ,b ~~ v ~ c 0 3 •~ N Z C U c c V °o°o°o°o°ooo°o°o°o °o°o°oo°oo °o°og°o ~°oo°o~°o °o So °o °oo°o N N N O~ O» O» ~ ~ N N ~ M O~ O~ N O O ~ N N ~O ~ O~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '•" ~ ~ 0o M oo ~ ~ ~D Oi o0 00 t~ ~O vi O O ~ [~ M O O o0 00 ~ .-~ vi O~ 00 00 0o vi ~--~ M ~ Min ~O ViaMV'~NNVi OOOON Vi ~O ~080~ o0 o0M~~M NNI~ '~f '~7M~ vi T ~n N•-+~'~NNO 0~~--~~NN ~MM ~OO~n ~ ~ n C ~t0~ ~n N .N-i^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O NNNO~Oi~0~~7~~ NN~MO~O~ N of NNOO p~Q~M t~o0a ~O t~1 0000 ch ~ O7 MMM 000 Viet [~ 00 O 00000\ d' Vi n00N ~ M M N N M N M M M ~Y M M M N N M M M M N N N M N N N ~ 00 C O O O O O p O O O O vi N a ~~-. N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 0 0 i vi O O O O O~nOONVi N ;; v m 00~00~--~~v 0000N M01 V1 t~ M O Vi v t~ ~n~ I~00 . ~01~ V'i ~ ~ M O~ ~ ~ N . . M •U W bD Q .y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 •k y 000000000 oooo00o 000000 viocooo 0 0 000000 vi o vicococ o w vio l~ O O ~0 ~O ~0 ~O ~0 ~O t~ ~0 ~0 ~0 ~O ~0 .N~ ~ ~ N ~ b V ~O Obi N .d 000 0 ° ° ° °o QQ Qg $$SS Y .o a ooo 0 0 O O 0 0 ~ ~ o ~ y ~ ~ ~ M M N ~--i ~ O V~ U '. f`1 ~[~Rh O .~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O l+ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M ~ l~ M ~ y „y ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, v, v, o o vi o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, v, ~n O o 0 0 v, vi o v, vi ~ ~o 0o0~ ~O N ~n ~o N d a 6 o ooN0vi 00 ~--~t~~O ~t~ SMMV OAT ~ ~ O~ N ~ v i _ e ~~: ~ , h W G7 C/1 % ~ CO O bD t+ r+ O U i C C ~ .` O O O O O ~ ~O y ~ xi G f/~ C O O vi ~ ~ ,y ~ ~ Y U '+ ~ O Y ~ u w u ° ~ o ZUZZ ~ 0 ° 0 00 000000 ° o 00 0 o o ° .p' b 0 ooo 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 oo 0000 0 0 o c W ~ O O O 0 0 O O O~~ O ~ M O ~ ~~ ~ ~ .-. M ~ D '~ N N M a eTE y ^ * a + y y :~ r , , ~ ~ .- U , y W ~" y C S7 ~ 0. ~ f ~ O '' ' .c O ~ ~ ~ ~ .d en b c ~'. > v ~ ~„ ,~ en i' °~ 7 '° ~'2ti d ~b 3 _ Y x~ E •~ C o ~ C ~ d bq 00 ^ «~ W N ~ y O > x~ O> p ~ U ~°~° Y T T x~ U 'O ~ C v x ~ 'N' w CQ Oa ~ a W ~ _ ~ ti o a W ~ ~ 3 Sl O v. ' y f~ 'w •H ; N aa ~ ° a°> ° o ~ Y d f„ 'L+:° =~ o ° "• d U N U ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~' 3 o ~ '~ ~ c y , 3C V] ~ a~ U ~ V7 L G ~ w n ; C ti `n C U C C o a~~ ~ 6 o ~ o c ~ > > .J > '~'.c2.. ~ C ~ Y O '~ S 63 ~` O O U Y b .'i' «+ N ~~' a~ G b O ~ >N U Y~ y > U > O `.t '~ ~ _. C O U 0 0 7 ~ 0 ' O a0i aGi C aCi 3 ..^..:" ~ O ~ W .~ O ~ ~ 0 .~ .~ O. O ~ 3 `.t ° LO' ~ U O F' ~ OO• c V t G c tl vU~xmmU~c~oa. ~ zzwc7~ ~ U> UC7c7wc7v33x~x Q ~ s ~ o ° v ~'r~. ~ o F c v~ ~ C O + ~; ~ 3 ~ O . ~. .1 Y ao a ~U 0 0 40 Cave Spring High Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source New high school (2,000 students) 19,460,000 C LL,BI OR Addition to current high school of 29 classrooms, cafeteria & library expansion, and site improvements to accommodate grades 9-12 and 2,000 students 7,000,000 C LL,BI AND Addition to current high school of 5 science labs, 7 classrooms & elevator to accommodate current enrollment 2,500,000 C LL,BI Building renovations/restrooms 250,000 C BI BI Air condition gyms 175,000 000 65 C C BI Upgrade auditorium , 000 60 MR GOR Roofing , 000 25 MR GOR Storage space Replace rooftop A/C units , 40,000 MR GOR Replace ceiling tiles 30,000 000 80 MR MR GOR GOR Bleachers/gym Bleachers for athletic field , 15,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 150,000 MR MR GOR GOR Floor covering 35,000 000 20 MR GOR Exterior door replacements , 000 30 MR GOR Outside lighting Sidewalk/step replacements , 20,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 43,200 MR GOR Total 3,538,200 New stadium (6,000 seat capacity) * Application for literary funding pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 4,500,000 C BI Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/22/94 cip\CSHS.WK1 41 Hidden Valley Junior High Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Pr ect Cost Project T e Funding Source Building renovations/restrooms 60,000 C C BI BI Air condition gym/auditorium 100,000 000 20 MR GOR Window repairs , 000 20 MR GOR Replace ceiling file , 000 60 MR GOR Floor covering , 000 20 MR GOR Physical education area , 000 25 MR GOR Storage space , 000 40 MR GOR Bleachers/gym Paving parking lots/driveways , 125,000 MR GOR Exterior door replacements 20,000 000 20 MR MR GOR GOR Outside lighting Sidewalks/step replacements , 20,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 38,200 MR GOR Total 568,200 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair Ed -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\HVJH.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 43 Bent Mountain Elementary Capita! Improvements Projects Project Description Project ~~ Project Type Funding Source Air condition classrooms ~~~ C C ~ BI Air condition gym 60,000 000 20 MR GOR Cover outside facia , 000 15 MR GOR Outside lighting Physical education area , 15,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 24,900 MR GOR Total 194,900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\BM.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 45 Clearbrook Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost Project Type Funding Source Building renovations/restrooms 130,000 C BI Elevator 150,000 C BI Air condition gym 60,000 C BI Floor covering 15,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 20,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 15,000 MR GOR Cover steeple 10,000 MR GOR Storage space 15,000 MR GOR Physical education area 15,000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements 5,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 24,900 MR GOR Total 459,900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/21/94 cip\CBROOK.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 47 Oak Grove Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description rrolec~ rru~w~ ~ ~~~~~~~a ~~ Type Source Addition of 4 classrooms & library Air condition gym/auditorium Building renovations/restrooms Additional parking Administrative support technologies Floor covering Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways Sidewalks/step replacements Storage space 860,000 C LL,BI 60,000 C ~ 100,000 C BI 60,000 MR GOR 33,400 MR GOR 25,000 MR GOR 25,000 MR GOR 30,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 15,000 MR GOR Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip\OAKGROVE.WK4 1,228,400 Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 49 Northside High Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Athletic sports complex 7,500,000 C BI OR New gym, lecture hall & 4 classes 3,500,000 C LL,BI AND Building renovations/restrooms 250,000 C BI BI Air condition gyms 175,000 000 150 C C BI Elevator Upgrade auditorium , 125,000 000 20 C MR BI GOR Exterior door replacements , 000 80 MR GOR Bleachers/gym Sidewalks/step replacements , 30,000 MR GOR 25,000 MR GOR Storage space Stadium repairs/restrooms 250,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 45,000 150,000 MR MR GOR GOR Floor covering Upgrade student lockers 30,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 135,000 200 41 MR MR GOR GOR Administrative technology support , Total 5,006,200 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 08/05/94 cip\NSHS.WK1 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 51 Burlington Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost F'rojec~ Type runam~ Source Addition of 8 classrooms 680,000 C C LL,BI BI Window replacement (94 Fall VPSA) 120,000 Building renovations/restrooms 150,000 15,000 C MR BI GOR Storage space 000 15 MR GOR Floor covering , 000 30 MR GOR Replace gym floor , 000 60 MR GOR Air condition auditorium , 000 10 MR GOR Cover steeple , 000 15 MR GOR Outside lighting Sidewalks/step replacements , 10,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 45,000 MR MR GOR GOR Administrative support technology 30,400 Total 1,180,400 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/20/94 cip\BURL.WK4 53 Mason's Cove Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost Project Type Funding Source Air condition gym 60,000 000 60 C C BI BI Building renovations/restrooms , 000 25 MR GOR Addition parking Administrative support technologies , 24,900 MR GOR Floor covering 20,000 000 15 MR MR GOR GOR Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways , 30,000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements 5,000 000 15 MR MR GOR GOR Storage space , Total 254,900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GO~i -General operating revenue 07/20/94 cip\MASON.WK4 55 Glenvar High Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Site improvements (94 Fall VPSA) 200,000 C BI Upgrade auditorium 75,000 C C BI BI Building renovations/restrooms 50,000 C BI Air condition gym 125,000 000 25 MR GOR Storage space , 000 60 MR GOR Bleachers/gym , 000 20 MR GOR Floor covering Stadium repairs/restrooms , 250,000 MR GOR Exterior door replacements 20,000 000 30 MR MR GOR GOR Outside lighting Paving parking lots/driveways , 150,000 MR GOR Administrative support technology 38,200 MR GOR Total 1,043,200 Project Type: Funding Source: C -Capital LL -Literary loan MR -Maintenance & Repair BI -Bond issue ED -Equipment GOR -General operating revenue 07/21/94 cip\GHS.WK1 57 Fort Lewis Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Air condition classrooms, upgrade electric, renovation of existing space, gym addition & ADA improvements 1,300,000 C LL Total 1,300,000 * Application for literary funding pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 08/09/94 cip\FORTLWIS.WK4 59 William Byrd High Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Addition of 22 classrooms & elevator 3,300,000 C LL,BI Upgrade auditorium 50,000 C BI BI Building renovations/restrooms 250,000 C Air condition gyms 175,000 C BI Air condition shops & labs 60,000 C BI Relocate bus lot 225,000 MR GOR Replace A/C chiller 125,000 MR GOR Additional parking 40,000 MR GOR Storage space 25,000 MR GOR Replace ceiling the 20,000 MR GOR Upgrade student lockers 30,000 MR GOR Stadium repairs/restrooms 250,000 MR GOR Roofing 50,000 MR GOR Floor covering 20,000 MR GOR Exterior door replacements 15,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 45,000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements 20,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 150,000 MR GOR Administrative support technology 38,200 MR GOR Total 4, 888, 200 * Application for literary funding of $2,500,000 pending. Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/22/94 cip\WBHS.WK1 61 Herman L Horn Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost Project Type Funding Source Addition of 2 classrooms & library 620,000 C LL,BI Air condition gym 60,000 C C BI BI Building renovations/restrooms 50,000 Additional parking 30,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 29,800 MR GOR Drainage 20,000 MR GOR Floor covering 30,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 20,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 25,000 MR GOR Replace cafeteria floor 20,000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements 15,000 MR GOR Storage space 15,000 MR GOR Total 934,800 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 07/21/94 cip\HLHORN.WK4 63 Roland E. Cook Elementary Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Cost Project Type Funding Source Addition of 4 classrooms & library 650,000 C LL,BI Air condition gym/auditorium 40,000 C BI Building renovations/restrooms 150,000 C BI Additional parking 20,000 MR GOR Administrative support technologies 24,900 MR GOR Drainage improvements 20,000 MR GOR Elevator 160,000 MR GOR Floor covering 20,000 MR GOR Outside lighting 10,000 MR GOR Paving parking lots/driveways 12,000 MR GOR Sidewalks/step replacements 10,000 MR GOR Storage space 15,000 MR GOR Total 1,131,900 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 08/09/94 cip\RECOOK.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 65 Arnold R. Burton Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Building renovations Elevator/ADA Administrative support technologies Air condition shops Air conditioning upgrade Exterior door replacements Greenhouse heating Outside fighting Paving parking lots/driveways Sidewalk/step replacements 35,000 C BI 150,000 C BI 27,700 MR GOR 200,000 MR GOR 75,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 10,000 MR GOR 20,000 MR GOR 80,000 MR GOR 12,000 MR GOR Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/20/94 cip~ARB.WKi 629,700 Funding Source: LL - Uterary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 67 Various School Buildings Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Mandates: Alarm systems (94 Fall VPSA) 128,625 MR GOR Asbestos abatement 400,000 MR GOR Dumpster screening (ordinance) 80,000 MR GOR Fire alarm systems ($235 per strobe horn: 500,000 MR GOR Kitchen suppression systems 54,000 MR GOR Lead paint management plan 15,000 MR GOR Radon abatement 50,000 MR GOR Sprinkler systems Regs pending MR GOR Other Capital Needs: ADA improvements (94 Fall VPSA) 100,000 MR BI Mobile unit (94 Fall VPSA) 26,375 MR BI Roofing (94 Fall VPSA) 300,000 MR BI Facilities & Operations Shop/Storage: Administrative support technologies 22,400 MR GOR Paving parking/driveways 32,000 MR GOR Screening 20,000 MR BI Storage facility 50,000 MR BI Total 1, 778, 400 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance & Repair EQ -Equipment 07/21/94 cip~ALLSCHLS.WK4 Funding Source: LL -Literary loan BI -Bond issue GOR -General operating revenue 69 Land Needs Capital Improvements Projects Project Description Project Project Funding Cost Type Source Mount Pleasant Elementary Back Creek Elementary Fort Lewis Elementary Roland E. Cook Elementary Cave Spring Elementary Penn Forest Elementary 445,000 C BI Total 445,000 Project Type: Funding Source: C -Capital LL -Literary loan MR -Maintenance & Repair BI -Bond issue EQ -Equipment GOR -General operating revenue 08/09/94 cip\LAND.WK4 ~o 8 `~ d y G P~ ~ I„ v~~DN00000~M~QMO00M~0 ~ ~ e~S `~ r+ ~ ~ zo p pp .~ N t+1 '~ y ppp~pONpOMp~O~OO~OO~OO~OO~OC~ O~O~O~O~ ^, b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~" ~ E° 71 .~ .~ ... h .~ v o~ .. o~ .o ~w h II ~ p ~ ~ ~ `~ -~ t . ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 c°~ ~- "~h 3 v V .~ .~ V ~1 d ~ 0 ~! ~ N °~ W d N a Q ~ ~U T o~ N O Q Instructional Technology Proposal Roanoke County Public Schools July 1994 Technology shall be incorporated into curricula to enhance instruction, facilitate active learning and assist the teacher in the preparation, deli~~ery and management of instruction. Roanoke County Schools Technology Plan tifav 14, 1993 73 Capital Request for Technology Equipment by TypeJPurpose Descri tion i t ~ Est. Avera a Price* Est. Total I Lab Com uters for Com uter Science - Hi h Schools ? 52i $1,199 $62,348 Printers/ rinter access J 16 $1 400 $22 400 Networkin 96' $100 $9 600 Presentation Station 4 $5,000 $20,000 General Multimedia Lab for Hi h Schools 96 $1,699 $163,104 Printers/ rinter access 161 $1,400 $22 400 Networkin 96 $100 $9,600 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access 4 $5 750 $23,000 General Multimedia Lab for Middle School ~ 96 ~ $1 699 $163,104 Printers " 161 $1,400 $22,400 Networkin i 96 i $100 $9 600 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access I 4 $5 750 $23,000 General Multimedia Lab for RCCC ' 12 ~ $1,6991 $20,388 Printers 2, $1,400 $2,800 Networkin ! 12 ! $100 $1,200 Presentation Station/Laser Disk Access 1 ; $5,750 $5,750 gassroom Com uters @ 1:10 Ratio 1382fi $1,699 $2 348,018 Classroom Printers 1382! $388 $536 216 Carts/tables 13821 $100 $138,200 Libra Automation Elementary/RCCC) i 12± $4,935 --,---- $59,220 Libra Multimedia Stations ALL ~_ ~ 26 $9,431 " $245,206 Lar a Classroom Monitors I 8001 $1,999 $1,599,200 Laser Disc Pla ers 0 ! _ $750 $600,000 VCR/Bracket or Cart/Cables/Switch ! 800' $500 $400 000 Sub-Total - General Technolo y Equipment ' $6 506 754 i Instructional Networks for Hi h Schools i 1 I $233,765 $233,765 Instructional Networks for Middle Schools/RCCC fi __t i $233,665 ? $233,665 Instructional Networks for Elements Schools 1 j $451,200 ~ $451 200 Network Telecommunications ~ 26 $4,000 $104,000 WAN for Count Schools " 1 i $85,000 ~~ $85,000 ~ , I Sub-Total - Networkin i 51,107,630 Total - General Technolo for all schools 1 r S 7 614 3 84 I La to Com uters/Printers for IEP's 145 $1 570 $227,650 La to Com uters/Printers for S eech 7' $2,369 ! $16,583 S eech Evaluation E ui ment ! 1 ~ $13,281 $13,281 t I I Total - S ecial Education i $ 2 5 7 5 14 'Estimated Prices are based on current pricing for state-of-the-art equipment (July, 1994) 75 Computer Distribution 1:10 Ratio 1994 Capital Budget Proposal School Enrollment 1:10 Ratio Cave S rin Hi h 1192 119 Glenvar Hi h 599 60 Northside Hi h 1092 109 William 6 d Hi h 1020 102 Cave S rin Junior 917 92 Hidden Valle 787 79 Northside Middle School 875 88 William B rd Middle 871 87 RCCC 142 14 Totals - Seconds 7 50 Back Creek 289 29 Bent Mountain 81 8 Burlin ton 335 34 Cave S rin Elem. I 525 # 52 Clearbrook ~ 117 12 Fort Lewis 180 18 Glen Cove 515 t 52 Glenvar Elementa 520 ~ 52 Green Valle 391 ~ 39 Herman L. Horn 470 r 47 Mason's Cove 269 , 27 Mount Pleasant I 394 ~ 39 Mountain View ~ 391 ( 39 Oak Grove 530 53 Penn Forest 577 , 58 R. E. Cook 236 24 W. E. Cundiff 502 : 50 Totals - Elementa 632 Totals 13817 ! 1382 77 VOCATIONAL & aDLLT EDUCATION DEPARTI-TENT July 20, 1994 Capital Equipment needs for next 4 to 6 years This Request includes the following pragrams: Business Education Marketing Education Health Education Agriculture Education Home Economics Technology Education Trade & Industrial Ed~~cation These Programs are located in the foi?owing Schools; ARBTC RCCC CSHS GHS NSHS WBHS CSJR HVJR W'BM NSM Major categories of equipment needs include: I. Computer labs to train students for entry level jobs in all programs above. Tl~.is would be D4S Equipment including computers, printers and necessary installation hardware for schools listed above. $1,210,685 II. Computer Aided Drafting labs for CSH5 and GHS and upgrade Computer Aided Uraiting (C~_D} at NSHS and WBHS; also Systems Integrated ylanufacturing lab~(~-~°~ 260,000 III. Multi-media production equipment 166,100 ,_c~ ~~~~~ IV. Ering Auto Technology Departments up ro ASE Standards 93,000 ~~ V. State of the art sewing machine centers for Home Ec. 42,500 VI. Synergistics labs for four Middle Schools 504,000 VII. Modernize student work stations for all programs 784,989 Total Requested by Vocational & Adult Education Department; 53,057,274 79 Fine Arts Needs Report Art N m r ~ Per Unit Cost Total ~Q~i 10 Kilns 1685.00 16,850.00 10 Potters wheels 835.00 8350.00 1 35MM camera 500.00 500.00 8 Printing presses 1800.00 14,400.00 8 Hand tool sets 100.00 800.00 8 Electric tool sets 300.00 2400.00 10 Paper cutters 349.00 3490.00 100 Air brushes 35.20 3520.00 4 Compressors 275.00 1100.00 8 Laminators 1000.00 8000.00 8 Mat cutters 280.00 2240.00 4 Pug mills 1785.00 7140.00 8 Computer labs 22,000.00 176,000.00 8 Craft tool sets 200.00 1600.00 250 Picture frames 15.00 3750.00 TOTAL 250,140.00 al ~ AN ~, F ~.. z 2 a is OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 326 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM. VIRGINIA 24t 33 July 14, 1994 A REVIEW OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY FACILITY UTILIZATION AND ORGANIZATION Attached are alternative southwest county facility utilization and organization plans. These plans are not to be construed as recommendations but are alternatives available. Administrative Observations (1) The fall of 1997 would be the earliest a new high school would be available for use. (2) It appears that the present Cave Spring Junior/Middle would be utilized until 1997. (3) Renovation and other improvements for most schools would continue to exist (refer to capital improvements plan completed in June, 1994). (4) Funding would be necessary for converting the present high school to a middle school and improvements at Hidden Valley Junior/Middle. (5) Existing athletic facilities and parking at Cave Spring Junior/Middle will need to be retained if the school is closed. (6) Subterrain cost may be a critical factor in projecting new high school and athletic construction cost for Starkey property. 82 n 0 H E-+ `Q`, I`~1 z x 0 A Zd' O r..~ H H d ~i 0 W Y~I W ~ 'o o ~ h ~ H y .d •~ .i: ^ ~ O O w p ~ M a ,~ y O~ e g ~ ~ ~ U o ... O h .~ c °' o o ; „ r y a '^ o a£ c~ c' o ° ~a y ~ U ' ~. ~ H ~ ~ .~^.' ~ a+ U ~ C . c H fi w U' ~ 3 ~ 'm o°C n p ~ C b O 6> ' $ E ~ 3 . r ~ '~ «a ~i Z oo ~a ji Z ~. , p ~+ , U F O U fn N a i ~ / W ..~ Q~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U d O W O y ~ a Ga v .d N a b h ~ c c o o ~ a a ~ ~ A d z • 0 U A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ y o ° o ~ p °°' ~ °_' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, 8 a °' c CC cd ~ ~ ~ p O ~ U ,~ ~ bhp .C b .'.' ~ ""' 'd ~ d p . y fn ~ E ~' c. a, ° a~°i ~ ,~ U [/~ CL .~ U Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N .~ O ~ ~ C~+ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ G a ~ G ~ C ~ ~ ~ .N .~ s.. O ''~ ~ C ~ Ca c ° 0 v 0 ~ ~ > c ~ C U F ~ ~' '°i ~ o ~ '° ,, ~, ~ ~ a~ ~ o i v ~ ~ o_n '~ s c ~ ° .. a A ~ o ~ ~ a i ,~ U ~ .5 ~ U ~ .C _ ~ ~ U ~ N ~ ~° ~ E •r• O ~ ~.. O o,° ~ " ~ ~ o ~, ~ '~ ~ o > :~ a~ o ' 3 c o ^ o G ° z ~~ U .. U ~ x v ~- T ti z O H N ... z Q O A z ., Q N ~, .~ E..~ H G'r W ..~ W x d' R y .~'. ~ ,~ ^, U O w y O w ~ ` y V . H U O m O ~ op ,~ U ,C ~ 1'~ 'L" Cd y y ~ z i:~ o w H W o L a ~. y v~ '-~ O ~ b j i ~ ~ f G . ~ + +. O ~ ~ ,G y- t a a e a ~ c ~ A y~ ~ ~ `~ o :~ ~ .5 F Q U °' b A c ~ ~°- w ~ O c O ~ ~ ~ moo ~ o °o .+ N a .~ w ~ O a> ^~ ~ a a v~ R. ~ = v A ~°- ~ o a G ti . ~ r. O ~ n C i u m C ~+ a R. ~ o. ' z ~ o u ~ o ~ o °~ ~ ~, "' x ~ w .. .. [~ C^ •L .t N ~O h W R tvi~ ~ V ~ ~ O .. A o, aD ~ ~ N o ~ ~ U U 4' ~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ^~ ~ OA w'i ~• .C ~ O C y ~ O 3 c ,~ b > Z U ~n ~ v~ ~, ~, • • ~~, ~, • ~. ~~', .. .. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDQCATION P. O. BOY 2120 RICHMOND, VA 23216-2120 INFORMATIONAL TO: Division Superintendents FROM: Joseph A. Spagnolo, Jr. Superintendent of Public Instruction SUPT L NOV 8 1993 Supts. Memo No. 198 November 5, 1993 Edward W. Carr, Deputy Superintendent for Administration SUBJECT: Public School Building Ccst 1992-93 Attached are: 1. A list of new public schoo 1 projects put under contract in fiscal year 1992-93 with individual and average cast data by school types; 2. A List of selected additions and renovation projects in fiscal year 1992-93 with individual and average cost data by school types; 3. A 6-year (1987-88 thru 1992-93) tabulation of average unit area and cast data; and 4. A graph, based on the above, indicating the change in public school construction costs over a 6-year period. In general, the data covers the same items from year to year. If the construction cost does not acree with your records, it is because we have added built-in equipment, such as kitchen equipment, which may have been awarded in separate contracts (see footnotes). If you have questions concerning the above, please call Hunter L. Barnes, Architectural Consultant, Facilities Services at (804) 225-2035. JASjr/EWC/dr 88 a F H v~ a o~ Ua cn rn i N G1 a w a 0 ~. U z N F U h z 0 U a W N A z 0 z F F a z cn a W o ~ `.. U ... U] U C7 ~ H F .r F ~ h z a L:7 F H W a W F z H W a 0 0 H 3 W Z F U7 Gr O U U1 a • N wa . ~ cn a a F Cr. 0 F u~ r-I Z 0 H F U O cA F oa U U c~ z~ H [-a E-+ H C ~ wa a~ O U Q Er C W O 3 Q U ~ d Z O N Q W E z N N ~' ~O ~ N l~ I~ c'1 r-i O O ~ cn o ~o ~n ~a ,~ m rn c~ co O r+ yr yr yr ur ~ ~ ~ ~o a~ ~o ~o r+ ~n ~O c'1 l[7 G1 ~O CO O c r1 ~O ~O P1 c~ c~ r ~o w r yr ur yr to yr err m ~, ~, ~ t0 rl N N N V' e-~ rl i-1 rl i-1 r-1 O O O tC1 v' N O O Q' O ~ d' ~O O '0' c~ N O iri o ~ ~ r ~ m ~ o c~ c~ Q ~o e-i N ~ o o c ~ m ~ O O Q1 N P1 N O t~7 C~ ri C'1 N C' ~ l~ O In C' C1 C C' I~ N c'1 v C~ tf~ e' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O Q1 C ~0 v t(1 N ~O ~D t7 l~ a~ © t~ t~ ~ v N f7 f') f`1 f"f N \ \ \ \ \ I~ F1 In t!'1 N Q1 0 0 U O U U c0 O U ~ U O ~ m ~ U r+ ~ X ;~ 1-a 0 c0 47 1J 'Q Pp 'Q ~1 U1 O i+ E C G1 ~ O 3.+ .v --i r+ ~ ff1 'Q .:~ ~ 'O U W ~ cA > E ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ x ~ .~ C t~ ~ 3 m ~ a7 ~+ t+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m .~ d is U ~ ~ ~ .a y e-1 c•1 C1 m ~o N N ~o a f~ N N 0 a~ N 01 ~o N rl W Q ~ 3 O ~ H H 4W H ~a '~ '~? C ? R~ U ~ X c0 C1 N o a~ a s+ ~ c~ 'a ~ d 7 b'+ ~ .a ~ 3 C ~ ~.t ~ ~ W 'Q a~ c ~~ ~, ~ v] C a~ ue m ~ ~., ...~ ~a 3 a' Cl J~ ~ c m Ql O ~ O iZ ~ O i--I O •.~ 'Q N mw ~ a .,-~ ~ i.~ .O Q U U U1 ~ ~ ~1 Q) ~ ~ O U 1~ C N ~ a~ s ~a ~~ r-I ~ U D" ~ ~ C ?~-•~ ~i ~~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~~ 90 C'1 N r-i a a W a 0 O ... U W z H F U ~i G".. H O c U C O W Q z F ~ z H a W a ~ m E+ U W U h O ~ C a F z F O ~ F Q O z w a Z Z O H H H a 0 w F U W a w c'1 In C1 ~O Qt N !11 ~O ~D ~ O V7 G+ c'1 rl O iL'f l~ r+ Q b eP l~ C1 ~O U f!~ N tC1 N to ~ a' ~ d' In t0 c°1 ~0 t[1 c•1 O O c'1 O m O N a' a ~, ~o ~o ~ ~o ~ ~o ~ ~• ~, m ~ G:+ ~O N r1 ~ ~ N O C- N e-I ~O ~~ r-i ri O ~ r-1 N m m N ~ m (~ O ri U1 Iff C' r! N ~ .-I LCD e-1 ~•-~ N z O H F U .7 ~ F z cn OO U U . Q F C w zaF O 3 ~ U Q ~ O ~ <'1 O O c" ~ c•'7 N O O ~O O ~ ~ O O r'1 N N O O f'1 C Oti c'1 O m Q1 ri ~O N N ~O 0~ C1 N d' eP r+ C'1 r-1 tY'f I~ ~ ~ O O ~O I~ ~O CO f~ a0 a' 'a' CO ~O N C' C1 lP1 N r-1 ~O ~ CO ~. N• V} V} N C N C ~ ~ ~ crr yr yr ~ yr yr v} ~y N N C1 N c'1 r'1 c'1 r'1 C1 P! 01 a1 l'1 ~ 01 C1 ^v1 ~ Cti C1 Q1 \ \ ~ rl Q1 ~i) t[1 ~O tf') N N ~••1 r4 P1 ~+ :~ --•~ ~ U O U ?+ ?r U U 1J tQ R u+ U rtf 1~ 0 O U ~ CO' ?~ 0 U E ~ U U H ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ u1 '*~ ~ ~ •.a U C 'Q '' i0 m 0 > o c c a~ o o c c ~+ o ..i ..i •.~ ~C Sa ~d ~ O -~ rtf O ~ > > V] O ... U] ~ > C Gl w d z -.~ „"„ ~. .~ ,c a~ c ' ~ a a~ ~ ~ w s+ + ~ a~ .~ a~ w W ~ ~ ~ ~ C Z 'CS ~ Z Sa ~ -~ 0 ~ Q~ O W W U ~ m £ ~ ~ ^~ f-+ 0 ~ .» C 'C G1 C 3 ~ O U m 0 ~ ~ a , i 'Cf to m d w G •.a 3 •.•a ~ a+ m C UI a1 ~ La ~ > rtf L+ a1 cC >. fa UI 'C i+ is ~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U A L-.+ 3 O Aw 1~• M W r7 t7 h 01 O v N m f'1 Q1 a' c' CO N •e' b N W Q i-a W Q Ea O F > F wa 92 ~i m ~ a Z O o ~' a ~ m \ O E s ~ Q ... ~ 4 o -~-' \ \ ~ 0 V T v -~-+ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Om i ~..~ _ ~ o ~\\\ \ \\\ 0 ~, ~ ,- ~ o~ ~~ ~n a~ ~ c ~ 1 /~~ `\~ L L 4- ~ n U ~ ~ O W O u7 O to O GO t~ t~ cD cD W tt3 6g t~} f~? bf} b9 ~ bF} 6r3 . . 94 ' Y n ~ :i : i n n :{ d E_ + - ~ ,1{ 'ClJ ~ ...111~~~~~~{ uY7V'c on ' ~Mr ~r~' t oGl r w W ~4 G } ~ v ~ $ ffi i ~ rv ~ r. ^• ~ F ~ ~~ ~ '• ~ W ~ 0 N 7 `\ r n Mtlil ld I I I ' i I § I ~W W _ ~'~~r~ I ~ ~ I m I ]3r Y1 3)r13 -l- I ~ I +i rv L .-. ~ 4 .~ J YN~ era = ~ lE } Y ~ W y -_ y ~ ~ .Y .~ ~ 101t $ S YOIS )liALiYI ~ ~ I ~ ~ ... ~19/Lr3 ~ ~~ yr~ y p ~ '^ p ~ b I ~~ • I o ~ ~ 1' wls ~ IAY39 G d b '~T~---c._ -a~~ ~ T rf .~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ :.., o s .n N I' • ~ N b ~ ~ ~' »HVOIn] 4 ~, o~l~~o N G - ~ r ... ~ -. - i J + ~ I ur uY7u 1ralN3) t V '~ >3 I ~ ~ • I , M .~ ~ '° 'S uooa ~m x v uh w~ o E ~~L y hJ C• utl uval _ a+~71 „ C Y N -_ _ _._ N ~ = y Y ].ss3ao 3 ~ y.,ai~ O ~~ Q ~ ~~ - -- - q o ~ n L ~ V ~. £1 ~ rc N ~ 1C1 ~ ~~ I - ~ ~7 n u ~ ( N ~ ~ ~ n ,~~ li ua wrll ~ ~ ~- q e, ~ g `~ u JL Qj~ c o G ~ __ F U ~ w ].9Y3tl0 3_d l.A00 .~ G ~' K 0. ~ N N ~']j 96 -~ r~ C r_ E N lxU _N T.1 c D T Q~ [l. 1 ~ i J Y ~ 1111111111111111 ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ""' '~ e _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ - e PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ -_ SUBJECT: ..~ ~..~ ~ ~ ' ..,~',.'~ _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ _ ~ s ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c __ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ - mlllllllllllllliillillllllliilllillllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllillllllllllllilllllilllllllliilililitllm ROANOKE COUNTY COUNCIL PARENT-YEACHER ASSOCIATIONS 526 COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 August 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Roanoke County Council. of PTAs Endorsement of the 1994 $30 Million Schooi Bond Referendum on the November ballot Mr. Chairman, distinguished members of the Board of Supervisors and School Board Members. My name is Babette Cribbs. I come to you this evening as President of the Roanoke County Council of PTAs. County Council is made up of representatives from schools throughout the county including Northside, Cave Spring, Vinton and Glenvar. Council consists of PTA Presidents, PTA Representatives and Principals from each school in Roanoke County. Last evening at our first monthly County Council meeting, information was presented concerning the proposed 1994 School Bond Referendum. A motion was made that the Roanoke County Council of PTAs endorse the placing of a $30 million Bond Referendum on the ballot this year. The motion carried overwhelmingly. The vote was cast by representatives of the Roanoke County schools in a proactive manner to show strong support for the upgrading of our educational facilities. We felt a vote taken in August would give us ample time to sell the voters on the necessity of providing the best educational facilities for students in Roanoke County. With the vote on the table we stand ready and willing to go out into the community and educate the citizens on why Roanoke County should lead the Valley in educational advancement. I thank you for this opportunity to share the results of last night's County Council meeting. We urge you to place the $30 million Bond Referendum on the ballot and let the citizens decide. ~a.E~z~C,C~~B~(.~ Babette Cribbs President, Roanoke County Council of PTAs ~ioiesii~iniiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~ i _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPE ~TCE REQUEST ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE -~ CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: /~u6/~~ S cti o~ / ~ ~~~ ~~~ed~~« _ 'ors to reco nize me durin the = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervis g g = _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ =_ _ BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. the Chairman be entertained b a ti f l if ti . y on m y ica ons o c ar = Ques __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - - - fiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiinniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~t ~Jllilllllllllllllllllliilllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllll Ilillllillllllllllllilllllllillllllllilllllllllllllllilllllll~ . - - ,~ _ .AGENDA ITEM NO. _ ~~ ~ APPE CE REQUEST - . __ _ ~- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _- - __ SUBJECT: ,~ ~-r. r~ t..i. v-~ _ 'man of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the _ I would like the Chair p g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. s = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS =_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ = BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. the Chairman tertained b b ifi ti f l i . y on may e en ca ons o c ar Quest _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ nn~ ~ ~. ~, mlllilllllllllllllllllllllllillillll 1111 l ll l l l IIIIIIIIilllllllllillll Ililll IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIilllllilllllillilllilllilllllli~ ~IIIIIIIIIIilllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllililllllillllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllliilllilllllll~ _ _ __ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - - _ _ _ _ CITIZENS COMMENTS - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE _ c - _ n I J - SUBJECT: ~ ~, ~~ro~ dollar G~ - - - - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment P speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will whethe - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, ~ the Board to and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of __ do otherwise. ,- ' ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. the Chairman be entertained b a ti f l ifi ti . y on m y ca ons o c ar Ques ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ - c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - . - - - - _ - - • . . - - = NAME ~~ ~r"i ~ ~ ~ _ - . . _ c ADDRESS,~~~/C~ ~~~r~~tf'J OQ - . . - - - - PHONE ~7d~~ / / ~ " ~~ ~ ~' . . mlliiiillllllliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllillllillilllllllllllllillilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllll~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ __ SUBJECT: ~ ~~.~~ G ~ ~~ ; ~1~ ~...,n~~~ ~~~ -_ - -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the _ P g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. e c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _= speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK r - - - NAME ~~-~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ADDRESS ~"l,~ ~ C-~~-~~ 1'~~ "~~ ~ ~-`~~t~, - l PHONE ~~. - ~ ":~ S~ J mllillllllllllillllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllillllillllllllllillllllllllllll~ ~iiiiiiiirii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ APPE~,~NCE REQ EST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANNCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~~Uh''ti ' - ~ ~~ ~I S C - -~ ~ C UBJE T: _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: = ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NAME ADDRESS >' ~ -_ - PHONE ~ ~~I ~/ ~~~ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~t ~i~iiiini~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~T =_ APPE CE REQUEST _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED : BELOW: _ ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment P n whethe speaking as a individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule .unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. the Chairman Questions of clarification ma be entertained b . y y ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - _ n - '~ ~ r ~ ~ era 1 / _ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~. ~ ~ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~t ~ririiiriiirrrrrrrrrrirrirrirriiiiiirrriiii~iriiiriiiriiriiriiiriiriiirrirrriiirrirrririrrririrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrirrrrrirrirrrrirr - ~ wG~ ~~ l 1 K e ,~ Sp~r~ ~~ ~i~5~v~ is ISS~~ _ _ =_ - a ,~ ~--,QQ /~} S 'f N e ~i2 ~ e C~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. / - ~. `~~~ ~ ~a = APPE CE REQUEST - / PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ = SUBJECT: ~ f g ~ y~~ ~ ~o - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - -_ - _ firrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrriririirrirrrrrrrirrrrrrrririrrrrirrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiir ~Illllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllillij~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ __ SUBJECT: ~' t.~ i~~Q / -SM~O = s'S S t.I G I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. , _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ a ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ __ _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ m 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111m School Capital Worksession August 23, 1994 Agenda 1. Opening Remarks 2. Presentation of Need for Capital 3. Financial Analysis a. Fiscal Impact of Borrowing Elmer Hodge Dr. Deanna Gordon Diane Hyatt b. New Program to Annually Fund reserves 4. Board Actions -Upon return to open session, the action required under this session should be addressed in the following order: a. November 1994 Referendum School action County action OR Spring 1995 VPSA School action County action b. Finalize Fall 1994 VPSA School action County action m:\finance\common\boazd\8-23-94.age ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session with the School Board on School Capital Improvement Program (CIP) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is information from School Superintendent Dr. Deanna Gordon for the work session on the School CIP. I recommend approval of Dr. Cordon's request for funding of capital expenditures. These improvements need to be made, and the financial picture remains the same for the next several years. A great deal of planning has gone into this request, and delays will only result in increased costs. I like Ms. Hyatt's plan to combine School and County debt service and establish reserves for future expenditures. The voters are more likely to support the smaller bond issue even though it may require a two cent tax increase (or a combination of other taxes and fees). The only difference between the two proposed alternative bond issues is that the new Cave Spring High School is included in the $30 million version. If the Board chooses not to issue bonds, some projects will still need to be completed using VPSA and literary loans. If the Board chooses to utilize VPSA bonds for the items proposed for a referendum, it will still be necessary to increase taxes and/or fees. Even with the tax increase, we will have less money for other school and county needs, but schools are our highest priority. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens aoAN F ~F ~ L I- 70 Z G1 a J` ~ 3a (~- OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153 August 18, 1994 TO: Board of Supervisors Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: v~ F ank E. Thomas, Chairman, Roanoke County School Board a W. Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools SUBJECT: Referendum Proposals The Roanoke County School Board is pleased to forward to you the attached spread sheets showing the items that would be included in a referendum of $10.2 million and a referendum of $30.15 million. We realize that you requested a proposal for $15 million rather than the smaller amount of $10.2. After consulting with the financial staff and reviewing plans for renovations at William Byrd and Fort Lewis, we believe that it is financially prudent to leave these two items in Literary Loan applications, allowing a greatly reduced rate of interest for funding these projects. Therefore, we have reduced our $15 million proposal to $10.2 million. Both of the referendum proposals allow the school division to address some school additions that had been presented to you as part of earlier capital improvement requests. Additionally, these proposals allow us to move immediately to make some much needed repairs to buildings. Particularly you will find that we plan to totally renovate a number of restrooms, replace carpets that are torn and unsightly, replace ceiling tiles that are broken and water stained and generally make our schools safer and more inviting to students, employees and visitors. We are particularly pleased that these proposals also allow us to purchase a limited number of new computers for use in our classrooms. You have heard from parents, the business community, students and teachers our need to train young people in a manner that allows them to compete with their peers for college entrance and for jobs. This equipment would be the first step in implementing our six year plans for fully infusing technology in our classrooms. The population in South County will soon be the only students who are not housed in the K-5; 6-8; and 9-12 configuration that is the general standard in the state and the pattern in other Roanoke County Schools. We would be quite supportive of your efforts to build a new high school and bring this area into program conformity with other areas of the county. We are also fully cognizant that the $20-$25 million required to accomplish this Board of Supervisors V~ ` Elmer C. Hodge ' August 18, 1994 Page 2 goal is high hurdle. Nevertheless, any plan that does not meet this need should be seen as an interim plan. We should, at minimum, establish a specific timetable to move toward that goal. You have also asked us to speak to the plan that we would follow if no referendum were proposed. You have earlier received capital plans outlining the rate at which construction projects would be undertaken within current projections of debt drop-off. We should point out that the Northside gymnasium and auditorium have not appeared on these time tables. Without a referendum, it would be delayed many years. Further, there are no funds within the current operating budget to provide major renovations or purchases of technology. With the current level of funding, the list of needed repairs will continue to mount and our students will be denied access to learning tools currently being used in most Virginia classrooms. In addition, if no referendum were proposed, the amounts included for Glenvar site improvements ($100,000) and Glenvar Middle renovations ($400,000) would need to be added to the Fall 1994 VPSA Bond Sale, in order to complete the renovations at this school. We are sincerely appreciative of your efforts to fund schools of the highest quality. 1 Roanoke County Schools Brief Description of Projects in Proposed Funding of Capital Improvement Plan Roofs - $300,000 Replacement and minor repairs to various school buildings. Glen Cove Elevator - $125,000 Installation of elevator serving three floors to comply with ADA mandates. Alarm Systems - $128,625 Initial upgrade to existing school alarm systems to comply with county mandates. Mobile Unit - $26,375 Purchase of mobile classroom for Northside Middle school. ADA Improvements - $100,000 Renovations to comply with ADA mandates including auditorium seating, state access, walks, curbing, and restrooms. Burlington Windows - $120,000 Installation of replacement windows in conjunction with renovations and energy management plan. RCOS Lighting/HVAC - $200,000 Replace air conditioning units in new school board administration building. Glenvar Site Improvements - $200,000 Relocate existing tennis courts, softball fields, lighting, parking, and physical education areas in conjunction with renovations for middle school. Glenvar Middle Renovations - $500,000 Balance of middle school renovations, furnishings, carpet, and technology equipment. Cave Spring Junior - $2,500,000 Air conditioning, electric upgrade, window replacement, ceilings and lighting, auditorium upgrade, floor covering, lockers, elevator, outside doors, and ADA improvements. William Byrd High - $3,300,000 Addition of 12 classrooms, renovation of 10 existing classrooms, and elevator. Cave Spring High - $2,500,000 Addition of 5 science laboratories, 7 classrooms, and elevator. tJ~ `' Fort Lewis - $1,300,000 Air conditioning, electric upgrade, renovation of existing space, gym addition, and ADA improvements. Fort Lewis - $100,000 Architectural and engineering services necessary in order to place literary loan on active funding list. Glenvar Elementary - Modifications to existing classroom space. $100,000 Technology Equipment - $1,000,000 Purchase of classroom computers to accomplish a 1:25 computer to student ratio. Major Renovations - $4,000,000 Renovations to all school buildings as detailed in the attached schedule. Northside Gym/Auditorium - $3,500,000 Addition of gym, lecture hall, and 4 classrooms. New South County High School - $19,000,000 High school serving grades 9-12 with a capacity for 2,000 students. South County Stadium - $900,000 Stadium repairs, parking, fieldhouse and restroom renovations. School Buses - $500,000 Purchase of 10 new school buses. 2 c:\wp5ldoc\capital\description • oo~n~nooooo000000000000 0l O O N f~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I O O C O C 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Oln000000000000000000000 ~Q O~ I O N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O ' O~ )r O ('7rr rrNC70~('7~f'")rrOOlnOt! rl ~ Nc~Nr- s-d'Mr N i C • ~II ~ O O I J O ~ ~I O ~ J 0 Q °•' ~~ a. _ _ ~ ~ ~ C ~ O O O J O ~' r O ~ J c~ ~ ~ ~ O O '~ r y o~- Zrn ~y ~ ~I '~. , O. j fAl ~ ~ .«. c ~ 0 o rn o ~ Ua c%~~o aC ~ . O U 7 . C ~ II/ ^~ ,, ^^ T vJ VJ Q ' ~V d O O 00 ~ ~ ~~ 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ~' O Za ~~ O O L f') t 1 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~. O O N f ~. 0 0 0 0 0 O Q OOCflC700000 O Otf)cOt000000 ~ r Q.. O N N N O N 0 0 0 Chrr rrNN~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 O O O N O O O O O O O O O Ln (+7 r N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O °o_ o °o °o_ °o_ °o 0 0000 0 ~ O O ~ O ~ r 'c}' M r O c dN' ~- O O~ O ~ ~~\\ r N ~ O ~? V i O N ~ M ~ O O O N U o o ~ ~ ~n o °- ° o ~ co -o °o ~ ti ~ o a ~ o ~ o N U O O o ~ O 'ct ' Q' O ~ O ~ O ~~ll V O ~ ~' Ln N ~ r -O ~ O O N O U o 0 a 0 o ~t ' °- O O~ O~ M ~ O ~ ~ O { r ~ N ,,, ~ O O N U 0 0 0 0 u-• O O o o r r )( ~ O C o ~n ti •- o ~ o cfl ~n ~ ~ 0 0_ X N ~ ~ O Z '- ~ w C U Q ~ F- ~ >, N C _ O _ U _ O N N () O a ~ Q O ~ N . ~ O O ~ ~ ,/( r v r ~ r l ~' ° o N U cn .-. ~o ~ N o0 -o co Ego a~ ~. ~ > UE~ w 'o~~ ~~`` LO N N ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ 3z ° a> Q _QCn ~ Eo o ~ ' ~ ~ U .~ (B N O ~ d (6 ~ r U ~ ' 7 N ~ ~- 0 3 ~ ~ ~°- ~' = c' W W ~ ~ p °' in vOi m N ~ tL O o >,~ `o..o ~ ~ n.~ n.~ ~ W ° ~~ °~ can U ~ o 0 0 ~~ o E~ O c C o m a~ ai a3i C ~ o L~ o -o ~ ~ • ~ ` o p ° ' ° ' ~ o ~ ° ' ~ o o ' ~ c_ a ~ U c - - c o ~; - ~ ~ o ~ o a > 2 C7 Q ~ Q m ~' C7 U U > U LL LL. C~ F- ~ Z Cn Cn m ° J c Q o (n 3 Y d U U rn ,i 0 O 4 CV O a ~. a ~ E C VJ CC ~ a ~ '~'' ~"~ y v .~ > ~ ~~., u is G „d' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p a a R ~ U MMO ~ ~..y O ~' P~ Q1 O p~ o `""~ u ~_ ~ rr~~ 1~1 N Q Q ~ _GI H C n. c a° o ~ n 5 •~ 6W a Q UI Q x .. N >~ G 7 • 7 > 0 j G b ~ c 0 .~ O c ai cJ p O > ~ U ~. y N C O U c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 ° ~.-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 CA pp" vj h h M v1 N O O O N h ~ O O C.1 NhO~ O h 7 N C C\ '""' ^" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N C\ ~ et M o0 ~--~ N C\ ~ 7 00 v1 a\ V1 [~ ~ O O Q\ OO et [~ Vi N C1 O N vl M ~n N O O O ~ 00 N N G1 V M S 00 V '~t M O B V'1 vi V1 O O N N M~ h ~O N N N O M Q~ [~ O O O 00 ~O r+ N CO N N ~--~ M O 7 N t~ ^' ^' C, ~ N [~ O ~--~ N M M .-. .-. M ~ .-. H N N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~O ~O ~ONNNNNNN ~O ~DNNNN ~O N ~D ~ONNNN ~CJ~N ~D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 N M O ~~ O N ^ t h DO h ~O O ~ M~~ ~ ' -. .-..-. .-..-..-. N N V N N N Q\ C .-. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O V1 ~O O O V1 ~ •-~ ~ ~O ~O C r. ~ h ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v, ~n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o h h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M M ~ ~ N 00 ~ 00 W ~ 'ct V1 ~O 00 '[t ~O D\ v1 O\ M O~ 'ct C' [~ O O ~D O vi h~--~NMV' N[~M ~0~.-.~~ ~ N 7~--~M~MN 7NN o0 N N ~--~ ~--~ N ~ N N 0 0 vi in 0 0 N N 0 0 ~ ~ N [~ N ~• O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O Vl Vl ~!1 O 7 M N N M ~ ~-• M 'e d :. ti v ° s 'D •~ ~ -o o • c d a ~ ~ 'e en c -, ° 0 ,- -v ° x ~ ~ G =~ .^: -c, ~ c W c,o :° a~ v ,- v -o v ° cC °o ~ ~ 0 0 ~ C ~ ° •C ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ o ~ ~ °' n > e ~ j y • • • •~ C.1 0] W c ~ ° v o > U c ~ ~ C=1 ~ e ~ > ~ R ~ fn ~ y U ,~, Cn 'X C C7 G:. ... rn rn O U C C L~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~p ~ ~^ U ~.~. ~ y G J U •O X N y q ~' S .~ C 0 7 .^^, C C C C :. _. C~ cd L=7 ~ O y •° --. "' C ~ T ~ ~ ` ^ '.•~~: C . V O O .. . O ^ O > > 'O U C > 6) G O -• N c~ O N N ~'c~~zcacat~v~7oavzzca~~~~°~~c°~~°33x~c°~3~¢c~> ~c N ~•. ~ d " ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ ~ h ~ N , ti '~ ~ , w r ~v .~ d O O d v OJ .Q C U v C N ~i o, 0 ti q r ti v Y Q o~ a •U m N_ O N C O 4. .C N U "-' ~ c a~ E > > 0 0 U Q, Y C ~ O ~- ~ ~ U oo~r,~nooooo00000000000000 0 O O N 1~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O oocac-~ooooo00000000000000 0 ~lo~ri~cflooooo00000000000000 0 O N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ ~ ~('7rr rrNC~O~~M~('7rrOOO6~~OLnr O N(7Nr r~0i Mr- N r d- C (9 ~ O OI J O ~ ~ O ~ ~-, LL .J m Qo ~~ > ~~ C. ~ O O O J O r ~ LL m rn C ~I 0 0 J T ~~ N ~I 0 0 0 O O N ~-w cn o ~ c+~ ~ a ~ U ~' ~~~~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ > CI O •` Z of ~~ O O t!~ tC) 0 0 0 0 0 ~. O O N f~ 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C O C *~ O O O O O QOOLnNC0OOOOO ~ T O N N N O N 0 0 0 a_ M r r r r N N~ W O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ M r N r 0 0 0 0 0 w O O O O O N O O O (7 o ~I M r /;.» N LJ Cfl ~ N O N o ~ i.o O ~ o ~ ti `>, 0 N o d' M O O L r O N Q. O ~ ~ O U a 0 .fl ~° o 0 U a. O 'O -~ ° O U ~_ i 00 0 °v °- o M o ~ O ~~\\ 00 ~ O t!') V ~ O r ~ N O 'Up O N U ° ° o o 0 0 ° ° o o ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o M ~( N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ O ~ C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ N »-~ N ~ O 000000 O ~ O CO CO W ~~ QX ~ ~ OOOOLnO -- ~ ti ~Z ~-' ~ V C ~~'- r~O p')r O L (y UQ r M ~ O U O N CO U O \ ~ Q O ~ N . ~ O O ~t ~ ~ ~\\ ~ V ~ ~ 'O r j, p ~ O ° O N U E C O N ~ O O U O C O (6 E ~ p °-~ W ~ L °eH U ° O oZS ~ U Q ~ ~\ U ~ N U~ > C =_"O L Vy O U c 32 ° m Q ~N rnoc Eo o - m Z 7 C c C~ O r U O N O S Q L (n ~ ° ~ ~-~ a'E °-''mss= E E ~ E~ ~ ~ to ~ W Q-a fn U a~° >3~o-orn--a>~~ ~cACAT~°a~c in c _°°U~ . ` o~~ > ` ° ~7 c ~ ° ~ ,cn3 3c o ` °- Ea~~ c`ooc`ocA> ` UUL~ o c °m ° c~ ~ ~- O~ ~ ~ a i ~ o c c ~.ai o > ~ > ° U-,3 3-C c.c c o¢ `-U ° ` o c c ° a~ c a o-- D cU-- ca c~.r,.:- o m a~ a~ o o U o ~ ` ' :•- c o U>ULLLLC I--~ZZZfnCllm ]~UU ~C~Q~QQ J Q Cn 5 'ct >Y d. U 2 U rn 0 O V~r ~1 CS a ~. 6~ •i~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ a~ y ~ •-~ a ++ u ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ L V ~d V LrUj r Cti y ~ ~~+ c. q '~ U ,~ 'C7 q et q ~ o ~ o r--1 .. .__i U r`r ~ F"'I 0 ~H ,~ V I M SF3 9 U . C Q o C H T '" V • ~` U ~ ^ m ~~ _. > •~ ° N O ~ r7 T 7 J 3 o i z: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 N~ V V' M GO ~•-~ N D\ ~ V 00 ~n D\ ~~ ~ O O~ W 7 I~ V1 N D\ O N h M ~/1 N O O O D\ oo N N T 7 M 7 GO V' ~t M O V' ~/1 h Yl O O N N M 'ct [~ ~O N N N O M D\ [~ O v'i ~ l~ ~D --+ N o0 N N -~ M O V N I~ •-• •-• G\ W N t~ O O N M M ^ ^ M (~~1 ^ N eh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c op op v1 vi [~ M ~n N O O O [~ R' 00 [~ 7 O M oo O\ ~ O .V 1. N [~ O ~ v~ O~ O O [~ 7 N •`t ^ ~ ^ N N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ~ ~O ~O ~O N N N N N N N ~O ~O N N N N ~D N ~O ~O N N N N ~D N V' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o o ~ o 0 d• ~ vl ~ ~ N . r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A V O N ~ N M O N ~ h oo I` ~O O ~ M~~ N N ~ . .-, .-. .-. .-+ .-. .~ N N N 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ~p ~O ~ O lr '""~ ~ «A 'V 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 OO~n 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o n vi ~ 61 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M i O O ~ \ M O O 'l D\ ~ N oo •cr o0 00 V •ct v1 l~ ^ N M ~O N I~ M v1 ~D o0 7 ~O T vi ~O ~^ 7 7 ~D N D M O V '~t l~ V' ^~ M 7 M N '7 N N oo , ` O N N .-. .-, N ~ N N `o `'~ _ • v~ v~ r U O O V ~ ~ N O n "~' V Cl 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O C 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O • 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O C D\ N M ^ ^ M O M y C N a v o v a ~' .. °_ ~ .- v ~ v Y ^A ~ N •x C C Y ~ N vi ."'[~. rG C O O > cA .9 y O >. >. ~" A U 'O y q .. ~ ~ ~ `° .v `_ •~, N 7 O A> ~ ~ o n > ~ o ao> o ° N N O> U C .'T'. ~ '~ W vv 2 o N'n q q ~l O C pQ v~ aW U ~U y ~ w ~ `~ aO ° , , , ~~ ~v~~~ aw , , Ap n ~ i ~, ti _U o ~ ~> >a ~ E ~ ~ c c ~ o g ~ :~ h ov - ~~ ~ c U O -O Y O~ O `'t ~ ~^.. y 7 C C C .~. .... ~ 7 ea W •: v ... C VUUxggUUC7Oa V zzC1C7~~UC7C7wC7 V$3x~o;~~QU> ~q u z - ~` N ... ~ y~ H Q '= .~ d h r O ~~ ~ - w o O ~. y C N~a. 00 _ y N .a C N a X W (U Na o co oV r U ~ ~ C ~ O O ~ C N ~ a o~ o ~ w CT C C O 0 O U ~ 0 N N 'U^ VJ y O U C t0 ttf m N :_~ CO 7 U y N CU N O y N O a d m 7 C C Q ~ C CO~I~~OOOOd'OOCAInrf~MOtnrI~M O N In r W~~ O~~ N O ti~ N O C1O L!7 M t0~ MtnOtnC7NI~NN~0)~OMC7DMI~N1~ ~° O~OOr-~o0o0COf~MOCOMOCONOCn O O~ . Od'UO(ANLnrOMtn(AMCOOMI~r~t70 rN~tl~r~OCONaO~rti~OCOMOtn 0 ~rNNMM~f'lntnCOI~I~Q0o0d~ m ~ O C0~1~~C1000d'OOOLnr1~MOlnr ISM 0 oDNtnra0Od'O~d'NOf~tnNOOOtnM MLnOtnMN1~NN~O~COMOOMI~NI~ ~ C [A r O O ~ ~ CO ~O CO f~ M O CO M d) CO N O to O V'~ O~C70CANLnrOMInOMCOOMI~r~f 00 rNd'I~r~YOCON00~rt~~OCOMOtn N ~ r N N Ch M ~ In to CO 1~ f~ a0 00 0> H M N M ti '~ O N O O~ N O C10 O N O Cb CO N OCONInO~I~ONNCOOMf~rtnONC0 COI~Of~COCOMrr~0)N'c1'CO(ArMC0C10 e N~ ~tOOOOlnO'~oOdOCOtnMr-<AC70CO~N 7N m LnN~fO~CONOOrN~COC70OrMln1~(n rNMtnI~OC'~COONLn00Ntno0r~f~ ~~~~NNNMMM~~t~ ..• COf~MN~OCOI~OOCflCO(OCOCOCOCOCOCfl C COMMInf~r~L(~~O~I~I~I~f~l~l~f~f~ '~ Mrtn~00O~'chON~~d~~~~~~~ r O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO C O N o0 O) r ~ f~ CA O ' O 7 M M M M M M M M O M M r N N CO a0 N N C m~ rrNMMMLnL(~(OCOCOCOCflCfl(Ot0~0~0(~ ~_ m ~' Ql COI~MaO~OCOf~OO)COCflCOCOCOCO(OCO(O O OO M M In ~ r ~ to ~ O f~ f~ l~ f~ f~ f~ l~ l~ l` Mrln~ ppp~~~ON~ct~'~t~~~t~d: O ~ C O N o0 0 ~ O I~ O~ a0 ~ CO CO CO Cfl CO CO C0 C0 C0 O L OChMrNNCOODNNMMMMMMMMM ' ~ U )ln(flC0(000CflCflCO(OCfl~OC~ rrNMMMII a~ H MONO ti~MOOOd'00MOMQOCIOMC+O00 0 0 CO N Mtn N N N O M M M M M M M M M N o COONf~CAO>I~f~OCONNNNNNNNN N~ d'COO0)O~M~~0C70oDCJOCfOCf0C7000C70d0 r 7N m to COrt[)CO (O Cao (~rrrrrrrrrr r r r r N N M M M M M M M M M M M to COMMd'tn~'~NCANOOOOOOOOO yCA OrYM~C~01~r~ONOOOOOOOOO O ~ 'crMM(OCOI~CO(OOOrrrrrrrrr C~ MOCOOO~Y~OMOMr~ra-~~~~r ti M 0 (A O N r f~ I~ to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CA O .~ ~- N M to I~ C7C) C7O ~ ~ to to to to to to to to to to In (n> _______---- r r r r r r r r r r r r r O o~rti~cOtncomooraooooo00000 ~p N ON~tn~'OrI~~fCAC0 ~ O rl~ooo~~V:~~Or a O rtiOd'NCO(ONI~rC~ t O) r C0 0 0) CEO CO I~ r N M ~~ InMNOf~l~f~rr r r r M ate. to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to ~ ~ to lf') to to to lf7 to to to tn_ to lC7 to to In to to to to lC7 (~ ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r H to O) N N r O r r M CO M C70 to O O O r ch to O ~' OONMNC10OlnNCO cYOMCIOrQOLn~O ~ ~ ~N~~rOOrr(Of~I~MMtntn00'd'r Nd I~~f~r~ChCV (A~I~~tln~Ch~ch~~'~ _~ MCOO'c}'C'7Mrr(OCOOOOOONI~MrO(A _ ~ N O O CO ~ ~ ~t o0 f~ C0 C0 `~t M M O a0 00 C0 1~ ~ O MNNNNNNrr~-rrrrr Q ~ 0 to CO I~ a0 (A O r N M ~' Ln CO f~ C10 d7 0 r N M V ~ L. tAtPO0)OOOOOOOOOOOrrrrr U O ~ i i ~~ N i ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ i i i i~ i y O ~'lnCOl~pO ~ OrNMd'LnCOf~O0OOrNM } CAO)CA(A~O)OOOOOOOOOOrrrr jL O(AO0~O(7)OOOOOOOOOOOOOO r r r r ~ CA N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r in N N O O C .~ O O a~ t O 0 i Q O O ; C = E ~ c~ ~ N Q .L-.~ 0 'O Q ~ ,~ 0 •3 0 ~ m ~ c v O C C N •- O O- to .~ L C (] 'C3 O O O O L O N U O n m ~ ~ O >+ coo N ~ ~ 7 U 0 0 U O L N Q u-i d' Y Q d U 2 U (A O O 8 u-I • County of Roanoke, Virginia Debt Projections -County General Fund Board of Supervisors Meeting 6-28-94 ~~~~ I S~hr~o/ ct~.{~~f Funding of Total Savings over Fiscal Existing 1993 School County 1994-95 Debt Year Debt VPSA Issue Debt Payments 1994-95 4,305,310 307,583 4,612,893 0 1995-96 4,264,841 254,416 4,519,257 93,636 1996-97 4,107,197 252,144 4,359,341 253,552 1997-98 3,733,776 264,313 3,998,089 614,804 1998-99 3,729,151 246,236 3,975,387 637,506 1999-2000 3,544,681 233,389 3,778,070 834,823 2000-01 3,556,783 215,799 3,772,582 840,311 2001-02 2,308,928 198,669 2,507,597 2,105,296 2002-03 2,301,325 181,929 2,483,254 2,129,639 2003-04 2,270,979 165,584 2,436,563 2,176,330 2004-OS 2,273,194 154,591 2,427,785 2,185,108 2005-06 2,273,380 134,041 2,407,421 2,205,472 2006-07 2,276,217 119,004 2,395,221 2,217,672 2007-08 2,274,593 104,396 2,378,989 2,233,904 2008-09 2,273,183 90,224 2,363,407 2,249,486 2009-10 2,275,735 71,617 2,347,352 2,265,541 2010-11 2,268,652 48,875 2,317,527 2,295,366 2011-12 2,277,429 32,000 2,309,429 2,303,464 2012-13 1,906,212 11,000 1,917,212 2,695,681 2013-14 1,130,250 15,375 1,145,625 3,467,268 2014-15 1,132,000 1,132,000 3,480,893 2015-16 1,126,750 1,126,750 3,486,143 2016-17 1,129,750 1,129,750 3,483,143 2017-18 1,130,500 1,130,500 3,482,393 2018-19 1,129,000 1,129,000 3,483,893 2019-20 1,130,250 1,130,250 3,482,643 2020-21 1,134,000 1,134,000 3,478,893 63,264,066 3,101,185 66,365,251 • ~Sy,~s5 .3~a;3~5 .SG ~~ y 7c~ 2a5, // 06/28/94 debt\CODROP.WK4 C,C - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-11 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF $3,200,000 SCHOOL BONDS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board has determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") in the amount not to exceed $3,200,000 ("Bonds") to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Projects") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"), and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County has previously determined it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $726,375 to finance certain Projects and to sell the bonds to the VPSA, and WHEREAS, the Board now desires to increase the amount of the debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000 to finance certain Projects and to sell the bonds to the VPSA; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1994 VPSA bond sale. 2. The Board adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the County School Board to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the Projects m:\finance\common\board\8-23-94.b from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Projects is $3,200,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: m •Q Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Ruth Wade, School Board Clerk Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Bond Counsel m:\finance\common\boazd\8-23-94.b ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-12 ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the County Administration has developed a capital improvements program to be used as a management and budget tool to assist County staff and the Board of Supervisors in addressing the capital needs of our community; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has held several work sessions with County staff on this capital improvements program; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of this capital improvements program was held on August 23, 1994 to secure the comments of the citizens after publication of notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County capital improvements program for FY 1995-99 is hereby adopted and approved. 2. That this capital improvements program shall not be considered a portion of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy 1 A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning 2 v_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the County Administration has developed a capital improvements program to be used as a management and budget tool to assist County staff and the Board of Supervisors in addressing the capital needs of our community; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has held several work sessions with County staff on this capital improvements program; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of this capital improvements program was held on August 23, 1994 to secure the comments of the citizens after publication of notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County capital improvements program for FY 1995-99 is hereby adopted and approved. 2. That this capital improvements program shall not be considered a portion of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. c:\wp5 ] \doc\agenda\general\cip. rso 1 -' ..? AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-13 ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Administration has developed a capital improvements program to be used as a management and budget tool to assist school staff and the School Board in addressing the capital needs of our school system; and WHEREAS, the School Board has held several work sessions with school staff and the Board of Supervisors on this capital improve- ments program; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of this capital improvements program was held on August 23, 1994 to secure the comments of the citizens after publication of notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County capital improvements program for Roanoke County Schools for FY 1995-99 is hereby adopted and approved. 2. That this capital improvements program shall not be considered a portion of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy 1 A COPY TESTE: ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ~-a~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Administration has developed a capital improvements program to be used as a management and budget tool to assist school staff and the School Board in addressing the capital needs of our school system; and WHEREAS, the School Board has held several work sessions with school staff and the Board of Supervisors on this capital improve- ments program; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the adoption of this capital improvements program was held on August 23, 1994 to secure the comments of the citizens after publication of notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County capital improvements program for Roanoke County Schools for FY 1995-99 is hereby adopted and approved. 2. That this capital improvements program shall not be considered a portion of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. c:\wp5 ] \doc\agenda\general\ci psc h. rso 1 ~- y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RCIANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE RC~ANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE 823 4-14 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LFASE AGREEMENT FORADDITIONAL SPACE FOR USE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES FROM 'I'RANSSOUTHERN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the execution of a lease agreement for additional space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building for use by the Department of Social Services was held on August 23, 1994. Due to the temporary and emergency nature of this request, the second reading on this matter was waived. 2. That it is in the Counts best interests to lease this property from TransSouthern in order to facilitate the installation of the ALIAPT computer system for the Department of Social Services for a period of four (4) months for the rental sum of Five Hundred Forty-Six Dollars ($546) per month, beginning September 1, 1994 and expiring December 31, 1994. 3. That the CountyAdministrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to waive second reading and to adopt the ordinance, and tamed by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Dr. Betty McCrary, Director of Social Services Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Property Manager 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of a Lease Agreement for Additional Space for use by the Department of Social Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The Department of Social Services currently leases approximately 13,627 square feet of space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building in Salem for their office use. Staff learned in early August that the State of Virginia will begin installing the ADAPT computer system for this department effective August 26. The offices that will use these new computers will need to be on the third and fourth floors of the- building where the main computer loop is located. Many of the records which will require input to the new computer system will also require confidential interviews with the clients and, as such, some of our other clerical functions need to be relocated. We will need the additional space to house mediation services or other clerical functions which will not be involved with the new computer system. The County has received a proposal from TransSouthern, the leasing company who manages the building, to lease 720 square feet of space at a rate of $9.10 per square foot including janitorial and utilities (except telephone), beginning September 1, 1994. This will be a short term solution to our space needs until the final permanent space solution can be achieved. As to the long term solution to the space needs of the Departments of Health and Social Services, we now have a target date of the end of 1994 for the School Administrative offices to be moved out of their present space which would allow our modifications and upgrades to be considered for the relocation of the two departments. Staff will bring back a proposal to the Board in the next few weeks outlining the timeline and projected costs to accomplish this move. Due to the temporary and emergency nature of this request, staff requests that the second reading of the ordinance be waived. FISCAL IMPACT' The cost of the new space will be $546 per month and funds are available within the Social Services budget. The City of Salem pays a proportionate share of these operating expenses based on caseload which averages one third of the cost. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends authorization of the ordinance allowing the County Administrator be allowed to execute a lease document for the rental of this space effective September 1, 1994 and expiring December 31, 1994. This date coincides with the lease expiration date of the existing Social Services Department lease for the remaining space at this facility. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator --------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR USE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES FROM TRANSSOUTHERN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the execution of a lease agreement for additional space in the Salem Bank and Trust Building for use by the Department of Social Services was held on August 23, 1994. Due to the temporary and emergency nature of this request, the second reading on this matter was waived. 2. That it is in the Count}~s best interests to lease this property from TransSouthern in order to facilitate the installation of the ADAPT computer system for the Department of Social Services for a period of four (4) months for the rental sum of Five Hundred Forty-Six Dollars ($546) per month, beginning September 1, 1994 and expiring December 31, 1994. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. c\wp57 \agenda\realest\socialser 3 ~uiuiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ist~~eioiuiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiii~ii~~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ s _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - _ - APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c - SUBJECT: ~~v~ ed~,~r~, d/1 ~4CL/"~ ~ - - - - - - - _ -_ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: c c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = - - __ do otherwise. _ __ - = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ - - _. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~t11 ~Iililllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllililillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllilllllll~ AGENDA ITEM NO. r APPE CE REQUEST "_ _ - G ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS PUBLIC HEARIN t = '~ ~Q r /E SUBJECT: (~U h ~ s J.P.-~ ~ n-~r ~ ~ n ~ s _ -_ s __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ~ i BELOW: _ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to ._ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c = ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized s __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - NAME J~a h cI ~. l l ~""~ ~ ~-• ~, a UDC __ ADDRESS 3 3~ ~, ~ 6 s a l d~ v »~- ~~~ ~. ~ PHONE 3 ~ `~ G 2 J '-~ filllliilllilllllllllillilllllllllllillllllllillllillllllllilllllllllllllliillllllllllllllllillllillllllillllillllllllllililllllll~ O~ ROANp,Y~ ~ ~ p z ~ ~ 2 v a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD CRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 29, 1994 Ms. Barbara Jennings 6835 Sugar Run Ridge Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Jennings: (703) 772-2005 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. for a raffle permit and one-time bingo game permit. The raffle and bingo game will be conducted on October 29, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYDECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, .~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ~~ix~#~ ~~ ~~~~~~P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS L£E B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ® Recycled Paper ~F AOANp~~ ~ A z ~ z J ' a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 29, 1994 w BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN 'NINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Ellen Jones 6141 Burnham Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Jones: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Cave Spring. Elementary School P.T.A. for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 15, 1994. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1994. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, 74'. G'LI~C-,~/ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ® Aecyged Paper C~.~ix~#~ ~rf ~~~x~.o~e O~ ROANp~-~ ~ '~ A z c~ z o a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE 'J03) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 29, 1994 Mr. Jim Matthews, General Manager SALEM CABLE TV 21 South Bruffey Street P. O. Box 827 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Matthews: I'l BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82394-7.g requesting an extension of time for review of basic cable rate filings by Boothe American Company D/B/A Salem Cable TV. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~. ~~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Anne Marie Green, Cable TV Negotiating Committee Harry C. Nickens, Chairman, Cable TV Committee Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney (2~~~xx~t~ ~~ ~~~xx~.~C~e ®p Pew O~ (>;OANp~~ z ~ z J a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 29, 1994 /~ l"1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. John Robert Slaughter, Chairman National D-Day Memorial Committee 4372 Kirkwood Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Slaughter: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82394-7.e indicating that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors supports the construction of a National D-Day Memorial to be located in the Roanoke Valley. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bah Attachment cc: Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors ®ReCyded Paper OF AOANp~.~ a ti ~ z c~ z ~ ~~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VIGE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY` MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 August 29, 1994 Chief Bobby Fronk Cave Spring Rescue Squad 3528 Overbrook Drive, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Chief Fronk: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission for a four-year term as the medical representative. Your term began on June 30, 1994, and will expire on June 30, 1998. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Lee B. Eddy, Chairma Roanoke County Board of LBE/bj h Enclosures cc: Carol Broadhurst, Secretary, RCT5C (~.~ixx~#~ ~~ ~.~rxx~~~ie Supervisors r--~ l~ ® Recycled Paper 0~ POANp,,~~ L ~ ~ z ~ ~ 2 v a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 August 30, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY' MIN NIX GAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Robert J. Lacy TaeKwonDo America 2057 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Lacy: On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, please accept the enclosed Resolution of Appreciation for bringing the TaeKwonDo America National Tournament to Roanoke County. This resolution was approved at the August 23, 1994 Board Meeting. I am very pleased that this national tournament will be held in Roanoke County, and commend you for your efforts at making this a reality. I would also like to extend Roanoke County's best wishes to all the participants in the tournament for a successful event. know. If I may be of assistance to you in the future, please let me Sincerely, Lee B. Eddy, Chai n Roanoke County Bo d of Supervisors LBE/bjh Enclosure cc: Board Reading File C~~~xx~#~ ~f ~o~xx~~~.E P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 ® Recycled Paper ~F AOANp~~ a ~ A z c> z J a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 31, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE 8. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FU22Y MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. William G. Rosebro 4924 Grape Tree Lane, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Rosebro: The members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service on the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on Commission. Citizens responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Roanoke County is fortunate indeed to have benefitted from your unselfish contribution to our community. As a small token of appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, .- Lee B. Eddy, Chairm Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bjh Enclosure cc: Carol Broadhurst, Secretary, RCTSC (2~.aixxtt~ .~f ~.~~t~.o~~.e n ®R P~ O~ ROANp,Y~ L ti p 2 ~ ~ - a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 30, 1994 The Honorable H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Fuzzy: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 I am pleased to inform you. that, at our meeting held on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as the Board Liaison to the Social Services Advisory Board. Your four-year term began on August 1, 1994, and will expire on August 1, 1998. State law requires that you take an oath Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. administered prior to your participation on telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has requestE letter with you. of office before the This oath must be this Board. Please arrange to have the ~d that you bring this State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Lee B. Eddy, Chairm Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bjh Enclosures cc: Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Department Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court ® Reoyaea Paper OF ROANp,~~ 6 ti 9 ~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 29, 1994 7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Philip Motley Grandin Court Baptist Church 2660 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Motley: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would -ike to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. Sincerely, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Boar of Supervisors (~a~x~#~ ~~ ~~~xx~~~E ® Recycled Paper o~ ROANp~.~ ti ~ z J a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 30, 1994 Ms. Gretchen Shine Vice President and General Manager Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. 5400 Fallowater Lane, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Ms. Shine: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82394-7.h requesting an extension of time for review of basic cable rate filings by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Anne Marie Green, Cable TV Negotiating Committee Harry C. Nickens, Chairman, Cable TV Committee Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney C~a~tx~#~ ~# ~~~xx~o~~ E~ ~r ®Recyded Paper O~ AOANp,F~ L ~ ~ z ~ 2 ~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 11, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Philip Motley Grandin Court Baptist Church 2660 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Motley: Thank you for agreeing to present the invocation at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors' Meeting on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, at 3:00 p.m. For your information, the Roanoke County Administration Center has moved from Brambleton Avenue to 5204 Bernard Drive, which was the old "Travelers Building", located directly behind Shoney's off Rt. 419. The Board Meeting room is on the first floor and visitors' parking is in front of the building. I appreciate very much your willingness to be with us on August 23rd. The invocation is given following the roll call and you are welcome to stay for as much of the meeting as you choose. 2005. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 772- Sincerely, Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors C~n~xx~#~ o~# ~.~~xxto~e ® Recycled Paper ~ MOAN ~ F >. ~ ~ z c1 z d~ OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 241 53 August 15, 1994 Mary, Enclosed is information for the August 23, 1994 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Garland Kidd will attend the meeting if necessary. His telephone number is 387-6453. T ank , c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge FOR_ DATE M OF_ PHONE ~~ 7"3~'Ol6 7 AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION ^ FAX ^ MOBILE AREA CODE NUMBER TIME TO CALL TELEPHDNED PLEASE CALL CAME TD SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TD 5EE YOU RUSH RETURNED YOUR CALL SPECIAL ATTENTION MESSAGE ~ SIGNED TOPS ~ FORM 3002P LITHO IN U.S.A. RO~i C0 CIRCT CT CLERK TEL~1-X03-33~-6145 Aug 03 94 12 15 ho.OC?4 P.01 (~.a~xx~tg ~# ~.a~xx~~a.~e STEVEN A. MCCiRAW, SR. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT MEMORANDUM T0: Mr. Lee B. Eddy, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~ Mrs. Mary Allen, Clerk FROM : Steven A . McGraw u, -r < DATE: August 3, 1994 ~,~'~~ - R.E: proclamat9.on, Resolution of Appreciation in Recognition of TaeICwohDo America National Tournament A~ we agxeed by k:clephane this marring, I am forwarding information far you to prepare a proclamation and resolution of appreciation to Mr. Robert J. Lacy, Chdirtitari cif the Board of TaeKwonDo Amer9.ca (a new national argani2ation) and owner of the TaeKwonDo America karate school at oak Grave Plaza 3.n southwest Rvaiiuke County. rtr. Lacy, a fifth degree black belt and his wife, Jenny, a tt:ird degree black belt, moved to their family to the Roanoke Valley in December, 1~~0, and opened their first taekwondo school on Apperson Drive in Salem in January of 1999.. 'this famf.ly approach to the martial arts proved so successful that the LaCys expanded into a rzew 5,000 square foot (mare than double their first school's size) location at yak Grove Plaza in December of last year. pur oldest son, Steven, was the Lacy' s first student, and the whale family; Sharon, Steven, Bobby and z, have all achieved the first degree black belt rank over the past three years. A resent article in the "Neighbors" edition of the "Roanoke Times and World News" featured our family for this achievement and detai9.ed the Lacy's unique approach to the martial arts. Vlore than half the Lacy's 350 active students, ranging in age from five to fifty-five years, are residents of Raanake County. T>7is year's TaeKwanDo America National Tournament will be held in the Roanoke Valley on Saturday, September 24, at Cave Spring Y9igh school. W2 arP c~xpectinq approximately 400 Competitors and 600 spectators from New Jersey, .North Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana, California, Ok7.ahhma, Missouri and Virginia. Spectators wily be charged $3.00 admission, and $1,000 of the proceeds will be dor:atsd to the Roanoke City Rescue Miaaian. Tha LaoyE and McGraws will be out of town. nn vacation August 23, but if you would like us to do sa, we will have Dr. Sob Cox of the Salem vA Medical Center, a second degree black belt and instructor trainee at TaeKwonDo America, receive the resolution. If you need additional information, please contact m~!. Thank. yne:. P.O. BOX 1 126 • 305 E. MAIN STREET • SALEM, VIRGINIA X4153-I 126 • (703) 387-6205 ~ R~y~~•d Paper the VDOT Secondary System. A-72694-5.a 3. Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Webber Subdivision. A-72694-5.b 4. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Community Corrections Resources Board. A-72694-S.c 5. Confirms±ion of Appointment of a Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. A-72694-S.d M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Congratulated Chairman on radio appearance concerning regional cooperation, and felt there was a good exchange of information. Supervisor Nickens: (1) Advised that he did not have an unlisted telephone number as some citizens have indicated because C&P Telephone left his home address and home number out of the 94/95 directory. C&P Information will give out both telephone numbers. (2) Advised that he agreed with the points in LBE's memo of 7/13/94 on utility deposits. 3) Advised that he will be out of the area from August 5 through August 16, 1994. Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Advised that he attended First Union's Ist Anniversary of Card Products Customer Servicing Unit and they have exceeded the projected employees by 100. (2) Toured the addition to Hollins Branch Library and it is proceeding on schedule. Supervisor Eddy: 1) Advised that he attended First Union's celebration and press conference and that they have exceeded the projected employees and plan to add more employees. 2~ Asked about status of drop off box for citizens. ECH advised that it will be several weeks before it is in service and there will be a press conference to announce it. (3) Asked for stators of Sewage Treatment Contract. ECH advised that it will be brought to the Board in August. (4) Advised that meeting with Roanoke City LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of John A. Hall to rezone 2.0 acres from I-2 to C-2 to operate a garden center located at 4925 Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 4, 1994 ~~ ~ ~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, August 9, 1994 Tuesday, August 16, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: John A. Hall & Co. 4925 Starkey Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 (703) 774-4441 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to receive public comments on amending the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow replacement only of individually sited single wide manufactured (mobile) homes throughout Roanoke County with a single wide mobile home constructed after July 1, 1976. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 4, 1994 n , Mary H. lien, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, August 9, 1994 Tuesday, August 16, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOR 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 25, 1994 / ~~ ,~ ,, AGENDA ITEM: Capital Improvement Program FY 199 1999 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed CIP (draft) for FY 1995-1999 was submitted for the Board of Supervisors' review and discussion at the June 14, 1994 meeting. Board members received a memo that summarized the CIP process and the projects that were funded in the proposed FY1994-95 budget. The County Administrator and the Budget staff answered a number of questions concerning various projects. A consensus was reached that as a long-range planning tool, the CIP document outlined the capital needs of Roanoke County for the next five years. This document will be updated on an annual basis as circumstances change and priorities evolve. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At this time, staff would ask that the Board adopt the Capital Improvement Program, inclusive of all County projects. The School Board is currently refining their capital needs and the Board of Supervisors could then approve the School's capital projects at the appropriate time. Respectfully submitted, W W. Brent Roberts n Budget Manager Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Motion by: NO Yes Abs Eddy _ _ - Johnson _ _ - Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix _ _ - Nickens _ _ - ls~ N o~u.b l i c LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to receive public comments on amending the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to include a Planned Commercial Development District and a Planned Industria~ n~_ P,__.,C,>_opment District A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 4, 1994 L~~' Mary H. A en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, August 9, 1994 Tuesday, August 16, 1994 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 29018 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on August 23, 1994, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR FY 1995-99 FOR ROANOKE COUNTY All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the Capital Improvements Program is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virgin' .~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: August 9, 1994 August 16, 1994 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 q,~z~ ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN -1 2 Mr. Eddy: RE: Court Community Corrections Resources Board I talked with Tim Phipps (VASAP) who is very involved in the Court Community Resources Board. He is going to try and find a County citizen interested in serving on the Board and will give me a call back. I asked that he TRY and find one by the 8/23 meeting. Mary Allen 8/9/94 (~ 00 M ~ ct I N d' 00 O I M M M I O [t m I M M e1' I oo f0 ao I d' I~ t[1 I ~ N M o I 1~ M r- o fD to d' M N I O W N I 1~ M O I 1~ O B I 01 r O I 00 ~ In I O d' N I ^ d' ~ I d' tF 00 .- N N a- M In N fV fV ~ P ~ P `- N 1~ ~ M 1~ I~ n n e- M M ~ 1~ I~ M r '~ I ~ W~ N I P to ~ I fD tD 00 I O N e- I r [f M I N (0 In I O O M o l f0 ~- r o M er •- 1~ 00 .- O d' O N d' N tt M N N er •- tt O M lA ~ O O r I~ ~ N M N O .- M N lA N to M (0 lA t0 to O `~ ~'!' (D CO N O I LL9 In O) M I N 1~ M I (O In I!1 I N d' ct I O O O I M M W I l!1 r CO o f O O N o ~ N N cl' ~ to N N N In In M N ~ O M O M N N d' M N Q1 ~ M f0 M W 00 ~ N M N M t!1 to M N P r N M ~ f~ f0 ~- 00 00 N ~ lq In M O O N o O O M o tt1 of t!1 M O N tt N d' d' ~ M M lD O O O ~- ~ ~ O N 00 ~ ~ .- N ~ ~ O N E r r r r CW G w cn w U Q w M er f0 ~ 1~ I I~ M n N I N n M I d' M M I .- 1~ O I O O O I n M O I d' '- O B I 0 0 ~ O M In c} O O M~ O O d' ~ d' r 1~ ~ N .- O ~ I~ N .- ~ n W (O 1~ M In r fD I~ M W 00 M N 'd' N~ d' c} Q1 ~ n M r N M 00 O O In o M M r 'z •- ~- ~-° M M N O O N t0 N [F ~- O ti' O N O r' ~- I~ :O_.W£..:i:? • N d' M O N O N f~ lD ~- 00 O M I~ N . %~ r r r ~~.:;~::.: ~ 2:: :;;:;;:;;iii' 00 O LA M 00 fC W 00 M lD 01 d' O 00 M M t!1 t0 O N 1~ l0 N 00 O O In o n N M o :'; M e} r' fD I~ O M ~ r In .- ~ N CF M N M M O N N M lA ~- p ~- r Cp Q~ :~f!.«,.<~'.:n:?`> :~i:i:i~ ~i:i:~>: M M M O O 00 N 00 M W ~ 00 M W 00 O ~ ~- C 0 ~; "~ r (D M '~ 1~ N M M In ~- In In N N (0 O O O ~I' 00 tF LA r (0 O O M o N ~ c} o .~ w . a; d; M O d: ~ M r ~ N t11 O N O ~ LlY y ~ ~~~ d' O to ~ O r ui ~ r c0 ~ O r r n N > ~ ~ W Z ~ ,., d ~ ~Y C ~ ~ n '~t 00 N 00 1~ M tD O N M ~ t!1 00 (O N In N O1 (C fD N f0 O O [}' o N r 00 0 ~ '' '' ~ ~ M In O N O O M O r In O r ~ d' [h O N a- p to r (p ~ :~ .; O .- .- O <- ~ r lA O fD N i~ lti n fC O t V ~ ~ ~ !~ n. W >:>:>s::::;: °~ _r-,; e FAX TO: Gary Robertson FROM: Mary Allen DATE: August 11, 1994 __ __ __ ---~ ____ SUBJECT. -~ "SSF/R Work Session Board Report ~~ ECH reviewed your work session board report this morning and suggested some changes. I have incorporated most of them in the Board Report, along with notes where he wants you to add more information. I know you're going on vacation next week, so I though if I faxed it you would have time to work on it tomorrow. Call ECH if you have questions. Mme' ~ ~ ~ ~~~'~-- s~/~a ~G. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Private SSE/R Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' AMORE BACKGROUND ON ORIGINATION OF SSE/R PROGRAM) HISTORY, ETC. On September 17, 1993 the Board of Supervisors voted to amend Section 18 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the Roanoke County Code to allow for enforcing the elimination of stormwater inflow and infiltration from private property. SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: The code as amended based surcharges for non-compliance on the amount of stormwater that could enter the sanitary sewer system. Although this method is excellent in principal, the staff has found it difficult to place realistic numbers on these flows without going to the expense of placing flow meters in each lateral. Below are the results of the Penn Forest inspections limited to drainage on Tanglewood Drive and at the Intersection of Meadowlark Road. As of June 20, 1994 the following has been accomplished: Total number of properties effected by survey 524 Notification letters sent to homeowner 357 68.1$ Authorization received from homeowner 342 65.3$ Cleanouts in place 371 70.8$ Internal/External inspections completed 340 64.9 Dye injection test completed 296 56.5$ Properties completed 294 56.1$ Properties completed with problems noted 115 39.1$ Additional properties with problems noted but incomplete at this time 23 Probl follows, in order~of severit (EXPLAIN EFINITION OF SEVERITY ~ W J~ (,. i . f ! S ~VQ~e (1) 8 Sump pumps for foundation drainage to sewer. (2) 22 buildings with connections of subgrade drainage to floor drains. (3) 34 buildings have cracks and evidence of inflow (heavy stains) of ground waters through walls/floors to drain. (4) 1 building was positive on dye injection test for drainage to sewer other than visible problems noted. (5) 2 sheared laterals at foundation due to settling. (6) 1 surface drainage to sewer. (7) 28 buildings have cracks/slight stains in walls/floors. (8) 11 buildings with possible water flow under door to drains. (9) 2 buildings with sump pump discharge to surface but overflow to sewer. (10) 9 buildings with failed joints in sewer lateral. (11) 23 buildings with problems noted by home owners comments only. (These items may be higher in severity but can not be verified by staff). The above mentioned I/I sources would cause surcharging of the sewer line and sewer backup in low areas during moderate to heavy rainfall under saturated conditions. Long term surcharging and backup would occur during flooding periods. PROPOSED CHANGES: Because of the difficulty in placing realistic flow quantities on the defects, the staff recommends changing the surcharge to be based on a category of defect rather than flow. DEFINE EACH CATEGORY AND WHAT THE PENALTY WILL BE Attached is a copy of the proposed changes to the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed changes to the ordinance be adopted following second reading. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL~703-772-2193 Transmit Confirmation Report No . Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result 001 ROK. CO. UTILITY RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Aug 11'94 13 17 01'46 Norm 04 OK Aug 11'94 POK. CO. UTILITY DEPT. TEL~?03-3~~-6230 pug 12 94 1'~~45 No.006 P.02 r ACTION # ITEM NUMBER °°y~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTX ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AG DA ITEM: Work Session on Private SSE/R Program QQUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUN The Roanoke County Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program was started in July 1986. At this time work was confined to making repairs to the public portions of the sewer lines. During this phase it became apparent that a significant portion of the infiltration/inflow into the County system comes from the private portion of the sewer system (i.e. from the lateral at the right-of-way to the house). On September 17, 1993 the Board of Supervisors voted to amend Section 18 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the Roanoke County Code to allow for enforcing the elimination of stormwater inflow and infiltration from private property. The code as amended based surcharges for non-compliance on the amount of stormwater that could enter the sanitary sewer system. Although this method is excellent in principal, the staff has found it difficult to place realistic numbers on these flows without going to the expense of placing flow meters in each lateral. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Below are the results of the Penn Forest inspections limited to drainage on Tanglewaod Drive and at the Intersection of Meadowlark Road. RO'<. CO. UTILITY DEPT. TEL~703-387-6230 Aug 12 g4 1446 No.OC6 P.C3 During this procedure one property owner that refused access to his property was taken to court. The court determined that Roanoke County's procedure was proper in this case, but because there was evidence to suggest that this specific property did not have a problem, the court determined that an inspection was not necessary. As of June 20, 1994 the following has been accomplished: Total number of properties effected by survey 524 Notification letters sent to homeowner 357 68.1 Authorization received from homeowner 342 65.3 Cleanouts in place 371 70.8 Internal/External inspections completed 340 64.9$ Dye injection test completed 296 56.5 Properties completed 294 56.1 Properties completed with problems noted 115 39.1$ Additional properties with problems noted but incomplete at this time 23 Problems found are as follows in order of impact on the County's sewer system: (Note: The most critical defects are not necessarily the most expensive to repair. For instance, a sump pump that discharges to the sewer would routinely have the most impact because of the large quantities of water they move, however, in most cases they can be corrected by relatively simple piping changes. (1) 8 sump pumps for foundation drainage to sewer. (2} 22 buildings with connections of subgrade drainage to floor drains. (3) 34 buildings have cracks and evidence of inflow (heavy stains) of ground waters through walls/floors to drain. (4) 1 building was positive on dye injection test for drainage to sewer other than visible problems noted. (5) 1 surface drainage to sewer. (6) 28 buildings have cracks/slight stains in walls/floors. (7} 11 buildings with passible water flow under door to drains. ROC. CO. C~TILITY D=PT. TEL:rG3-387-6230 Rug 12 g4 14:4? No.006 P.04 (8) 2 buildings with sump pump discharge to surface but overflow to sewer. (9) 2 sheared laterals at foundation due to settling. (10) 9 buildings with failed joints in sewer lateral. (11) 23 buildings with problems noted by homeowners comments only. (These items may be higher in severity but can not be verified by staff). The above mentioned I/I sources would cause surcharging of the sewer line and sewer backup in low areas during moderate to heavy rainfall under saturated conditions. Long term surcharging and backup would occur during flooding periods. PROPOSED CHANGES: Because of the difficulty in placing realists flow quantities on the defects, the staff recommends changing thg surcharge to be based on a category of defect rather than fla,M. Below is a chart categorizing the proposed changes I Direct connections (inflow) to the sewer of sump pumps (including overflows), holes in floor drains, downspouts, foundation drains, and other direct sources of inflow (including but not limited to visible evidence of ground/surface water entering drains thrU doors or cracks in floors and walls as noted during field inspections by the Roanoke County Utility Department II Leaking or sheared lateral and any other sources of infiltration as noted during field in- spections by the Roanoke County Utility Dept. Six months to repair. If not repaired, $100 per month until repaired. l Six months to I repair. If not repaired, $50 per month until repaired. ROK. CO. UTILITY DEFT. TEL~~Q3-38,-6L30 Rug 12 94 14~4~ No.0U6 P.US iII Potential or minor defect that do not adversely the sanitary sewer system at the present time. Voluntary repair. County reserves right to continue to monitor defect Customer to be notified if condition changes Attached is a copy of the proposed changes to the ordinance. RECD ENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed changes to the ordinance be adopted following second reading. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robertson, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( } Denied ( } Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs t `I\ •) ~ ~ ,;~ l~ara~ ~• ACTION # ITEM NUMBER C1 ' ~ ~ FETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~~ ~ iELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 26, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Private SSE/R Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On September 17, 1993 the Board of Supervisors voted to amend ~~ Section 18 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) of the Roanoke County Code ('' to allow for enforcing the elimination of stormwater inflow and ~ infiltration from private property. ti (~ ~ k, The code as amended based surcharges for non-compliance on the '~#~~~ amount of stormwater that could enter the sanitary sewer system. ~, Although this method is excellent in principal, the staff has found it difficult to place realistic numbers on these flows without going to the expense of placing flow meters in each lateral. A status report of the inspectior~'to date/ is enclosed. y I r~ ~~c~,~ ~ ~c Yz fit. Alternatives: (1) Kee ordinance as written. (2) Revis,~ ~'tlinance to list types of defects and place surcharges for lion-compliance on the category of defect rather than flow s, (set attached .~ ~-k ~=-- - 1 pro p ~~ ~ c- ~ G ~-~- ~y~ c~ `~' v ~ ~ ~ c...;~ r~ ~ r ~ sir ~~~J r RECOMMENDATION Because of the difficulty in placing realistic flow quantities on the defects, the staff recommends changing the surcharge to be based on a category of defect rather than flow. ~~ } ~' H~! rU~~ ~ ~ ,. I ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~f~ SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robertson, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE _ No Yes Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Abs 1 {L'~~ ~~ ~, ~`~`~ ~y ~' ~ ~~ ~;.'`, 1 PRIVATE SSE/R PENN FOREST ( BACK CREEK SEWER SHED )__-- This report includes Private SSE/R inspections performed in the Back Creek sewer shed, limited to drainage to Tanglewood Drive and at the intersection of Meadowlark Road. Notices to the first group of property owners were sent on August 18, 1992. The installation of cleanouts and property inspections were started on August 31, 1992 after authorization for internal inspection was received. As of June 20, 1994 the following has been accomplished: Total number of properties effected by survey 524 Notification letters sent to homeowner 357 68.1% Authorization received from homeowner 342 65.3% cleanouts in place 371 70.8% Internal/External inspections completed 340 64.9% Dye injection test completed 296 56.5% Properties completed 294 56.1% Properties completed with problems noted 115 39.1% Additional properties with problems noted but incomplete at this time 23 Problems found are as follows, in order of severity: (1) 8 Sump pumps for foundation drainage to sewer. ~~~ ~~` (2) 22 buildings with connections of drains. y i.C.~ h Y subgrade drainage to floor (3) 34 buildings have cracks and evidence of inflow (heavy stains) of ground waters through walls/floors to drain. (4) 1 building was positive on dye injection test for drainage to sewer other than visible problems noted. (5) 2 sheared laterals at foundation due to settling. (6) 1 surface drainage to sewer. (7) 28 buildings have cracks/slight stains in walls/floors. (8) 11 buildings with possible water flow under door to drains. (9) 2 buildings with sump pump discharge to surface but overflow to sewer. S~ +i~ (10) 9 buildings with failed joints in sewer lateral. (11) 23 buildings with problems noted by home owners comments only. (These items may be higher in severity but can not be verified by staff). The above mentioned I/I sources would cause surcharging of the sewer line and sewer backup in low areas during moderate to heavy rainfall under saturated conditions. Long term surcharging and backup would occur during flooding periods. July 28, 1994 Ms. Deborah S. Peoples 6019 Steeplechase Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 ~ X ~ ~, S~SSid~ C G - ~ vJ Mr. John Willey P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Willey: This letter comes as a request to purchase from Roanoke County, for the sum of $100.00, an abandoned well and easement to said well which is land locked by my property on Roselawn Road. You will find this property in Deed Book 1102 on page 746. It is identified as section (86.01 - 1 - 23). This property has already been surveyed and a copy is held with Mr. Michael Smeltzer at the law offices of Woods, Rodgers and Hazelgrove. As I must sell this parcel of land on which the well is located due to personal financial reasons, I would appreciate any efforts you can make to expedite this process for me. Sincerely, Deborah S. Peoples cc: Elmer Hodge Board Reports for 8/23/94 First Readings: (1) Pinkard Court drainage easement -Payne (2) Valleypoint Drive/Kenworth Road (3) Easement from APCO -Dixie Caverns. (4) Donation of easement to APCO -Darrell Shell Park (5) Donation of easement to APCO - LaBellevue well lot (6) Brookwood well lot (7) Utility Billing ordinance revisions .~-~" ROABORE CODNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date ~/i~(/G~ ~ Friendship Manor Name of Applicant Apartment Village Corp. Phone 265-2100 Address of Applicant 327rIershberger Road Friendship rianor Apt. Name of Developer Village Corp. or assigns phone Address of Developer Same Name of Design Engineer will be Motley Assoc. phone Address of Design Engineer 310 1st Street, S. W. 344-1212 Name of Contact Person Stephen Rice Name of Proposed Development unnamed Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Office uses 30=50,000 sq. ft. Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLPNIMET~IC N'L'~DER) Corner Airport/ Dent Roads Size of proposed development in acres: 10~~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum Q/ S-5 feet MSL. Maximum %G ~~~ feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No X Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. t S gnature~of Applican t ~cf ' o ~ / ~- _ ;,\ : _ _ ~ _ -, 1. x • ~ '~ I . - , % ;- ~..~ -- - ---- - - -- -~-- - - ~ _ ~ 1. _- ~ ~ ~~ / r ' Xi `- T r x / - ~ ' ~ - l x J ~ ~ ~ ~ - _~ ~ i !r ~ D ; . r N' ~ (' - ,. i ~ ~ r' - ~ i i l' ,, ~. ~ ~ ~~ ,o ~ . - ' m -~ -. m c ~t4r ,~ p O ~- / - ~ -. ~ ~ . .. 1 , . ~ - N ~ . ~. r ~ _ ~~ , ;\~ I ' ` ~ J`~~ ~'-'~-QA N O K.E.: -~-~~. ~ ~ -- ~s 1. ~ { N . ~ 1 , -- ~~ ~ / ~ ~.~ .~ 'F-s.Y y ~a * ~3 ~' 7' - y'~ ~.. _ . sue,. s-..~e~ A't ~~'~'- . " Y • s~0 - S - ' _ ~.; ' t -_ _ _ - - , _ ;._ _ ~ :.fir _' ^ .. -~ - ~~, ~~°7 ~ - ~- - / -- , ~_ - ~, - __ - . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-' ~~. - 1, l l~ - -~ ~- ~ ".- _ \. .. I . I ~ ~ - \ \~~ _a ~ ill F . - \~ : !. . O~ ~ /' RRRTTS _ ~ M - -' t ~ ~T . `~! /-. .. \. ~ - ~ - ~ ; . . / ` fit." ~ / L'I \ ~ /i . t ~ ~ / ~ ~~ ROAN }C - l -- . ~ ~; ~ J 5 .- - r~- - r: L ~ f F~ ~4 LT1 •' ~ ~ !ice ` ``1~'~ ~ ..~ Y ~ L < .S` '!~ +t ~ . .,, ..mac - 1 ~ ~ •r~`.A jr- :.w.. '•?~' f . a ~ - y. ~a^'~-+-:~ i~-,• Vii' _~"!'~.T ~x~- ~~~~ _. ~ \ L,~\\ ~- ~~ as ~ ~ = - . _- -" - - . ~ ~..~ ~ l ~ ~ - ~~N'~ ^ ~ '_ ~~. ~ 1832 ~ - • P ~ ~"• :• ~ _~ •' ~J ~~ ,"~ IpG~~i xrlic o .~ ` ' ~ ~ S~Ph~hpv•\.• - _ •`\: __. :_. /; _ / _ ~~' _.~,zi. .. \.~• ~ •• ~ -"- 117 ~ \ - ~ ~/Il ~Bur\i g•n ~ ho alto --. ~;~, ~ ~, ~ \~ ~~ ~- _ ;-.- l ~'' _ ~-, ~. Chi;` Tr ~ ~ .~'~ < ~ 1294 , ~,1139-'~' \ ~ •• --:.- x097 ~ ~ °~ \ i ~_ ' _ ~~~~ ~~~ %' • •. \ ~. ~• ~ • ~,~ o - r\ p " , ;~ 111111 _ t. r~~~-~'~'~.%f\. 'i .~ ~~i 7 -:~ -~ o ~ 1 ~Thza~t _~~~~/. o ~_` ~ \ 623 `' • ~ {{~~i fr 2~~ / ~,i t Lt~Oairt ~~Z i - ~Y ~V 1 /~'_~f1~.~ rs: ~ ~- _ -' •• ~[ ~~ t T11rigS 0 ! 'Eampgroan ,,~~ 1 .~Q- /Y i - ~ '~' ~~ ~ _- ~_--,. % ~ ~~. •~ ' o\~ ~ •. ~ •\ ~ r rc.7 R1=G10NA~{RPORT ' 118 ~ ~ / , ~~~ t -~-_~i ~- _ _, tW00DRUh1 FSELD) „' ` ~r~~//^^'km~ W ~,~-_ ~ j; hurt •'de ~ _ _- /, - / ~ _ _ ' - ~ f t~ (~ D \ \ 'i\,~ ~ \~-- `.1 ~ ~I l /I r - ~, .~ ` $lue Ridge ~~ >\. ~ ~ v ^\~',t , ~~ ~~ ~~i " • ~ ~~' -- • , ~ .Gardens +~', ~ ~ -1° x ~ J o •~ 'fir ~ fr\ ~--- - ~ .`\~,-fCemetery) ~. '\a `~ h° '" ~~ '• ^23 °° 1 1 - • 1172 .\ \ . i t ~,. .~~ . -._- ~ ~'.~ !r_ ~~ -~ C ~ • ~ ~~~ t~ ~ t l,' ~ c ~ ~ __ -__ -IIE~~ ~~\' VVV p• ., ~ ~~~' G.,~~ ~ i X415 1 _ ~lyi^• • ~ ~ ~ • . (((~~~ ~ ~ Cros,roadiMall~~' ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v at r ~ ~~~ti ~~' • >~ ~? 1, ' \ \ - ohoPPirig Center ~ :\ t~ .. (~ •i ~~ % \ t\ -, ,l - , .'j '., \~~1~ Q .- ~~\ ~co I~ ~~ l y t 1j/ •/~4~ ~ y \ ~ \/ 1.1~`%~\V! ~'~ ~ ~~~~ -~ '~.~ ~. l~ ~_ I .. ~~r. _ ~~ ~a ~'. ~I ~~~ fit .R~ 1 ~ ~-- ~F~O '\ `~ ~ (~ t ~ / ~ ~}~,7 ~y~~/i' `ems}y,G~ ~~ \\ i ~/~ Pr. ,~i~ r. i ,rii Addendum F Seo Map 86.19 1•• 100' \\ / 9• \v/ g ~~ c `,fir ..~\ '.\Mo4 ~+' c \ \ ''o'n / 90~ ~• 743 ~~ ..~_ ~_ \\ Ses ~ Rt.g90 _~~ ~.`y'~ Roo `` \ w oo ~ \ `--~". ~- ~ ~ ~' 2 43 21 4.9TAt i ~i 11` 9~,4J / 192AcC1 2.98Ac 1 ~ / ~ 6s S ~l.S6AclD1 ~ ,./tP` L11Ae ~> ~M •b3Aclq ~ \\\S ~~,2~ ~ 44 V S P \•"' 247SAc 1 ~ ° tin ~ ,.~ "- ate a2 p ~ ' - ~ • \ LooAClol ~ ~ ~ 4.90Ac101 ~ / \ ~ '1"3" ~ \ a ° ~ 0.6SAt ICI . ~ 3B N . s 4.04 AClCl ~yi / ~ \ ~ ev „ a ~ \ \ `, `' '\ ~~44 ~ I6 ~if~ 1.62 ~ ~ \ ~\.r~ Y 3.79Ac ' Q-` 7v~11 ~/ ' 3 ~ sI3>t • 393 Ac Y'- 132Ae /. ~ !~ ~/ ~^ANsM155, _ ./~ R ~ I.IOAc ~ ~/~t~~ ~ y¢. l3eAen~y ,S~/ ~ sotl aaf/ / ~ j~ LpAcIC, Co,~ 0 fy a apf .* at•22\ / ~?aAC ~~ / 1.02AC ' y~~ Ro _ 2.19Ae ~ ~ 34 2.1 I Ac VOAt ffls 5 - ~ POA ES SMInLL ~TACIC - e c ., ~~-~ STATION ., o" 2 \i ~~ , !?~ex~~l is i ~~ ~~"~ 1694ACtG J 9e i" ~ -V ~r . / ~~ 4 3 1 33 \ P ~~~ HI 23.39Ac ss : 3' sst \ s ,~ e a Rt. ~ 6 ilSO `~ :3 ~" • o 'I i ~ 3 ? 6;I ~. 10.66Ac list s ..~ 7~ a I I f ••, 31 r.i ~_~ L00 32 + ~329AC \ ~, 0 30 1.58 Ac /I `. \ .C \ °~~ .8 LOOAe ~ -~ ~ j ~i' 4S \ s c ' i!~ ' '` Acc s ~R~CI qo~ ; •; -Ro e 3.32 Ac ~ ~ \ ' ,' ~apb+ioy ' 123Ac I I~ ~t P" 13 ~•, I I6 Q'~o ~ ~ `I I Ac 19.1 lam ~~ ,~ / ~ , - ~ ~ \od ~ ~ t i~f i•~ P°~~`` t00ACO / /~ ~~ ~ ~ Rf. 934 ! ~ j ~' I7 ~ ~ _--- If ~~, sss4 is lo2Ac ' / / ~ ~ 22 ~ = 21 I9 t00Ac ~ i f!t- ! 29 L62AC " t9S Ae • ~ 2.S6Ae101 1 8.33Ac 2 zsAelel 23 ~i 2AOAC ~ ~, / ~~ w~ 100 Ac t~,l{O~ / j 2 a~ 24 0 • 2.S6Ac 4/ 2.OOAc 19 •.•;w ~~aA° ~ ' 23 18 . 0\~ ~ ssf~ 3 27 z ooAclo- z.ze' Ac lttAC / 2.16Ae 2.27AC1C1 a ~~ a N W r 7 0 2 7 1 • 1 t7~~ Li~ ~t : \ ~-u ~:: ~: ~~ Jd ~ w r1 ~ ; ' ~4 a i 1 0 2 '~. ~ ~ _, O ~ , t ~ A Z o J u ~6°~/ ~ t~ Pl6/ ig ;_: S~4 ~ ~ , i T r ~ I d ' L y s ~~ rh, .. ~•~. I i a i .' 2 17 f 86L~~+~QQ ~~~ t~ I! / ~; ' 8 0 ~_ 1r ~1~ ~~:. b A~ ~1~ N'~ ,~ = T j ~ ~ •`~ rt ~ i -~=xr~; i K s.r v i 3_Q76+.[O t w fG.K [Cott t F > ~ , S N W R ~ r ; ~ \ ~ o ~ den !_ ~ jw 'l J 1 ~ R .-_ ~~ '' s z 1 a ` t a ~ U.. ~ 'tai 1 }~ F¢- n .. ~@ \ $ \ ~ \ W ~~a\ ~~f-1 ~t s ~ 1 ~ 1 6 1a ~~~ ~ ~ \ ~\ K'9d'![f gp a:s ~' e r »~3 O $ O O C7 ~ M0~ . , .e= :g~ e ~ M e M i r » a ;`., e ~: " a :.So ~ r F iu ~ `oM~ ? ^ : O Mr„ M p` 000 ^ Mr ~•~I~M Y w utl~ ~ r oar ~ ~ eo ~ r -.~~ M ~ pppMpp ~s ~' Os~tl : ` y oe` ; r i ,aa F i~ y ~8 s ~~ F~Oi ~ ! ~F •MM~ ~ ~!!' w \~~ e ~ .L a \~ u ,; ~ I • J ~ ^O < < ^M pr t , YwwerOrLel M F ~ M r 0, ~~~~~~ ._ a~ ossg• F=6~ Frr! ' r~r~«~"~C~»3 `~n~OpOMO p° t»»ns~~FY1l~1I» »E~e~'~~~.J+g ~~ ~ a~r~: ~~-~~r~s'^^•eF 7e ~^ ^e~~~pMr1 J t,OO f~grgL ~g~~.~~~~C~ ~ ~@~~~"s~5~9 o m g f ~ 7 ~ `yc ~ & E ~ ~ < ~~ k~ a w ~ ~ j t L : ~ ~ } r 2 G J ~ `: g Y ! L ~ t~' o ,''; ~` c ~ 8r t ~~ ~~ ~m ~ C r O V ~ m ¢ y -' ~ 3J ~! a ~ z ~ N F •i 3 rW ~ W ~ N= W ~ u W W Z3 e: 'vim I F9L I ~ 3 i~ ok~ o ~ ~ ~- ~ w O_ ro r ~ 1Z ~ ON V ¢ W ~ ~ Z• w O G W ~ N C „ S ( `ic «: ?~~ 3 J Z W Q; i ~ I Q/ w+ W ~ ~ n ~ N 7 O / _~: i /, / P L / 'i U / ` ~1 ~~ ~ ''~~ 16~ ~~ oil, e ~~~ +~t %~ ,~ s _ n' G M J'~. I / X ~. .~ , ~~nst s / ~ ~ :;:~- ~ w I ~ N e• O € _ ~ ~•~~ •~z a~j Y C R` 5 ,}0 5 abed g wnpuappy ..a ~ ~~~ ~ ~dd 3 ~• ~ _ ~ • ~~ i r~p`• ~ g a ~t a .~ • Nrrt \ J 7,,1 Y ~~\7~~ ~-- ~ _, :o.s/ rt t w'rmr[a ' m 7~ 7..111 l - ~ ,s (-[-O7f /lTt s[tM VI 70 -_ .- I1^ 17 --t-ro-rr i zrI wrw •oeI la ron-•srsia~r0x•ronrow } ____-_ of ft-a/[ r o KM•~1n1 t ~rsnrw t ^ R g,, rr . 7 7 IwOr Fo'~ _ _ 8 e c T 7 ~ ~ ~ r o,;=a a~ '• ~ C w >! }r i . r. ~,~ J~'~b t ~~~" ~~- ~ „ 150.30 . `'SS ~ • o N 17'30'OO' • ~ ` ~ r~ , o F ~ ' 6 r `i: z J ~ g r ~ u o ~` ° e r 4 g« ..~ ON MVO ~-. ~~ ~ _ ~_ ~ u ;~ e v eke G~ ~ ~ss ~~ e r 9 E~~ ~ o~~ _ ~ , ~~ G ~ M 8 8 ~~ ~ ee R ~~ 0a ~~~tf I I I I ! ! S'~,±er < J p'Y Y ~ e ~t ~~.'j Yd :~~ z i I I { iii 11 E. ,; ~ ° ;"N ~- ' :~: ~dYCp ;dd_- 31`3 ~j1 -3 Se ~i ~ O Y<(n Y ^_t~ ~QYS.yo ;a;~~S _ d x F z si yl gi ~~~J~V~~~ :,< try z ~~ ix i ,A.. ~y1 ax 1 1~ 1 ! 2a r I I ;p IIrI t I 1 z I 1 1 x' e~, ° I _e ~ 1 x I Y x x x r ~ x \ ~\` ~ \ I . o- o- o- o- ~I ~f 3- Z r ~. r, I ~Y 1 !- ,rv J" ~ \aa"I' ~AY9 £lH ~~ ~ ` ~ ~? ~ ~ < i ~ ~ /J !v I I ;x 2" .~.I ~ I ~ " : ` I I _ I I i J ~ ' - - ! ' Y ~r.~~. ~: _ ~~ _ I :~ . , _~. _ ~ I r ° ~ y ~ I -~ z. y~ e9 -~ ; I i ' u I I . ~ ~ I x I ~= ' ~. 9 ~ ~ ~ 2 p1 IA~ A B V £i ~ I ~ ~ i ~^i i ! I ! ~ I ! E ' ~ / ^ / J~ ~o Z ~o I abed `H wnpuaPPtl 'f? y ~ '~5 acs .. < . Is- s _ , C I t #~ ;~ I J - `~ - sd3 zi-I = '=j r ~~ YIx%=' ii, Y .3,+ fi , fi_:~ ::~ qd~_~.i--. d ..-~~::. ..-._Y - _ 6 :x.. -- 9 3'. _ i .~ _.Y~.a _ ~.-..a_•.~ N c,.c i i;sa6- .... - N _. ~.. - s S .. .__._._ -_ w E o ~ N C Cl v _-. ~.__.. _. _..w.~-._ '~ Q1 ~ ~ ~`\ i Z f. \ . _.___._._r.~~v~+~+~c..-r-. - :i Y o S x ye-. ffrr i '!~:- °' O ..=d ~.1 ~YT Iii 9:J _ ? •c _, Y:YI N •~ i - - O 3 S ~- £ -__S i ~ I u • 'v Wi~ c I.i- 7 li. ~ ~ I3•ain `~~ a I ~.~. '. qq~ ~~1:~ S~ ~' ~ . ~ t i ; I --...SI I aa~-iC uaii9;~ ^•~• ~ ~~ -.: 1 s i 1 . __ ~\f f- 1 ,~ ~ ai ;- ~ -i -j-- ; s~; ~I L_ i T~ V•. L'. ~.'. . 1 i \ ; ~1 •, r' 7 ,, _ ~ ~'.t 1 _ 1- , 1 1 _ I\ . 1 .. _ _ ,. t ..1` , , j,; • _ ~ ~ . +,£ t ~~\ x'1~ x ~ '; ~~1 ~~~ ...1 - --~ - ~ f ~ ~+ ~1S M : ` _- 1~1 s _{ L ~ ~~ =-1~ - ~:. ~- ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ s • % / r~ •, I / iv \4: / = " }fir / ~/ ~ SIV v. ' •' \ \ mil, ~ ~. -1~ ~I \ ~I \\ \ l ~• \\ 7 \~s s: $' ~\ S. ,., SS - i 3 7_i 3 a .-. 9oc y _ a~ 3 3 3 \ /al it/.,. _. ,.. ~~'`~I`~'j NORTH Y"ALLEY" SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ~ U o ~ ~ •g' ~ ' ~ a' co ww~r. . 3 _~ ~~ 0 0 0~ E a~pXm ~~935' -~NS~D ~ ~ ~ ~ " 5~ w R w `~ w 539.48 ~' N~ 0 P~ z ~ ~ o~ R Q :.........._ ~ o ~- _ O~ •, ~~ i N W w. oD ~ ~ ... ( a -~ N ~ ~ O i -%~ 3 ~, -r cn F-- ~j M 0 ~ ~ U 'N ~ J ~ Q ~ Z ~ ~ N w u Z ~ :f ~' W ~ ~ Yo ~ ~ ~ f- ~ Z O Q p n Zr N 6TZg'S4. E z ~ ~ 251.27' Ssg 1 ~ 247.25 ~ ~ $ ` , i °° ; ~: ° S~ ~ r 7 I I Z a. ~;. 300. I I~~ ~ S 67'28'S4~ W ~..i ~ t a l ~ 3 m 0 Q ~ b ~°~~N F~?~ Q ~ iV I p ~ p ~~'` ~ "moo t~.~~ W ~ 'b N n I IN ~ (~ ~~~••~• • N ~ N I IOW ~ ~ N~~ EIS ~r ~ p Q i ~C7 I ~I,Wf W ZZ ` N Q ~~~'• W N ( 'V ~~ ~:.. a Q Z~ m W J_ Q ~ ~mm ~n ~ } ~~ oa x O ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ I Z z m ~~ ~ ~I I ~j~j = N I I ~yj ~~ ~ ~ N~ I I p~ -- ~ i I \N •jC~~V~~ ~~ I Y ~j I I N~ .-~rU Z.•- I ~ Wm MM~~ ~ w I I N~ rN N, Nm I W ~ ~~ t zr., ~ m ~~ ... ~ Q I i i zZWN ~ °- 1 1 h m ~. ra ~ I I F ~. o ~ ~ P ,.~ W N W N I ~ ~ w ~ ~ C ~ ctv I I x< t~ o ~I i N W o° >" <~ ~ i I wwa ~I ~ ~ z mvc I a. W ~' I 241.38 Q ~° ~~Z I Y ~ , w ~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ c F7'3d a2 ' tl ~~I / ~ T ~ ~ ~Q,~j ~ ~~~~ ~O .~~ / • J' H tACai ~ iii ES ~ QO ' O ,., \ ~ r O +t \ `( 0~ ~~ E LOCH -'~'~/ \ ~ ~ /~ LOCH `N :+'~Y£nR-- . ~ \ \' $:i'/MC 9 ~~~~,P:/ ~ .,soo I CLUB,/ "~~~ ~~`~ Yk ~~ ~1S I I(,~ ~~* .a • ~ I. ~ /r ..... .t ~ ,.' ~ ~.~ ~ NC I c •'•~ f "O c I ~ i ~' .. .h •~ I OJEao~ ~ ,~ i Z 1 ~ ar,r ~,cA° z~ 5.•~'~ ~ ° .• . . ' ~ K/N~i$iVN„ a o ~ ~~ ~ u,cuo .~' I; ! 628 RAxrH~, , a `~~ .. ~, :\ ~`r ~.~~' , ~' - ~ / }r! •~^rC Ri I~:3~ Cf H J ~ ,vOArMS,Ot '' TR~KIr ~'k'1 `.- 5 ly w000 7 RKS ~~~. ~ lrw r[ROwt[3iOI ~ ~~GVQ` .. I O~~AC.•• 1` YWf ~' ,ir-fir / ,.~~, R~i p' ~ .: L ¢A4Rin C. Crew r+h .nr,.,~C,'.~Itr :i = S~r..[ta1 ~ wSrA[•. ~ .t. .I ~ ~ J yY'ti~cSERVECENTFa~n ~ ~. ~ .[:~S ~~ ~ ~4 Cc ~ w~.n[oo' r ~~11~'K ,°. ' +~ ~ rr , s,.,.. ; .,'c :. • 5 '~ J F `yl / ac{ . S y I 1 1N ~~ . rfMC• 1Ei ~'j NQ~ ~/ ~ - '~~., , i107i Y air: r ~i 'PO '!~c- 70 1 -~~ . 4 ..: ..._.... N ~ ~3 : ~ ~'tw + oC 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T~~ E r•~ ~+ ,tea' t41 t covEHg~y ~ w6r ~ ~7, rY I p~[ 1 ~rOh . . ] . t. ~ ~ . 5 . , 7[p~ T N w rn • ~ GN[R ~ •• lS~ ~- ~ Y l4 ~~ .wOVNr.IN VI[y,,. / I ~ ,CA ~ l- DAWN Savo ia.c.~oo[0[+ io :;,,~ ... i .0 "~~ « x n .- - Q 4UHIGPAL O - ~ v~+C[ t0 '.,~ ' ~ Q ~ ~(( r. ^~~ ' !A( 'Lf^ f. t 7~ar.. 'mss ~~ $ ~~~ f~ ~~'~ ~ R~GI~NAL °'- `~ /4` JP'~~7MMI \ • , '•~ . ~• tk~ C --.r~~•- '~"7bolbb~3_J `a• :d`itN-/:Xit.~iA'L:..as Q,. l' ~~~p~r ~ 1~0 / ~~ YVR/YCM1 ~^T - .°~,, GAS •J ' Mp `rcWT . CR ,~' rf rlc+l u.•ado+ ,~IMN J I -.~`r. l ~ a~.cT fiaFaa' 3t aarV~ '~ :~•. N r Y[Z ~ ~rQ • ``y` ~ ~~R e~ I \ Q' ~ ~'C~•' q to O 3 ° i , ~ ~ lgtic ~' y~ ~ ; ~ ~~s C+N AC4[7 ~ I .:or Y ~ ~~ aiG `f ~ {~~^~,` HERSHBERGEa' ~' ~. T ~~ ~iti ~~, ~ 4~ •' ~ C *~ `T Area Map ROAHOICE CODNTY UTILITY DEPART?i$NT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PP.OPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date Ju1y 22, 1994 Name of Applicant North Valley SDA Church phone 562-0406 890-5579 Address of Applicant c/o Aubrey Kelley, 8325 Brubaker Dr., Roanoke VA 24019 Name of Developer Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Aubrey Kelle Phone Name of Proposed Development North Valley Seventh-day Adventist Church Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Religious Assembly; 1 unit Sactuary, fellowship hallJauditorium, classrooms, offices and support facilities. Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF 1~~ P~'D PLDVhr''?IC NL'iv~~P) west blockfront, Northridge Lane, 700 ft. NW of Peters Creek Road in Roanoke County, VA. Size of proposed development in acres: 4.347 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 1190 feet MSL. Maximum 1214.5 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? ~_ No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) Signature of Applicant . DATE: .ruly 22, 1994 (P18aat Type) f'/ APPLICANT: North Valley SDA Church ADDRESS: Aubrey Kelley PHONE: 562-0406 f~90-5579 OpjrjF,g; ELCA Loan Fund PHONE: ENGINEER: AGENT: PHONE: ARCHITECT: ?,GENT PHONE: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: 8325 Brubaker Dr, Roanoke VA 2,0;.9 ADDRESS' SITE INFORHATION DEVELOPMENT NAHE: LOCATION (FURNISH COPY OF HAP) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba TAX }SAP NUHBER : 3 7.14 I 1 ACREAGE : 4.34 7 ZONED : R-1 TOTAL UNITS : 1 TOTAL TATS : 1 BUILDING NAHE: BUILDING AREA ft B.O.C.A. USE DESCRIPTION TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: SEWER FACILITIES : COUNTY : x x SEPTIC i TOidN OF VINTON SEWER SERVICE ELEVATION (Use USGS Elevations) ~+.ZN: 1190 ft. ?SAX: 1214.3 ft WATER FACILITIES : COUNTY : x x TELL: TOWN OF VINTON WATER SERVICE ELEVATION (Use USGS Elevations) KIN: 1190 f=• ?SAX: 121•.5 ft. IS BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED? FLOW REQUIRED? DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Include any Specific Questions): G.P.M SIGMA OF APPLICANT NORTH VALLEY SEVENTH-DAB' All~~"l~NT1S"I• C'HVkC:H ~ , ~ '.~ ,. . ~ ~ , : ~~ \ \~~.L~~ NORTHSiDE HIGH 1*~zZ~ ~ { 1 ~ ! \\ ~ `SCHIIOL 37 AC. ~ ~ ~`~~ ~ ~ ~ i'. 1 ' ` \\ ~ - ~ ` O \\ 1 ' ~• • ~ ~~ 7 \ \ ~ } -L- - ° _ _ -sFi. ~~z3 c ~ \~ IS I6 ~ `\ % ~ \ ~_ a N ~• ~ ` ~ ., , ~ ~Z 1 0 ~ ~ ~ :' ~ ~• ,~ . -218 \ ~ .;,_ _ ~ OUTH Vic SCHOOLb o, \a ',k .21 . ~`' ,~` ~ Y~ 1053 AC. \ - \ VVV \ c ti\O.t 4 BOO - // •~ .\• \ :~ _ - ,L'6 - O i~ 1 / uuz/ ~ ~ '~ Cad .~ .; tj6 O 'a '- ' ~ ~- Sp ~. y.~ ~_ 9 V ~V1 "S . , H rl ~ ~ ~ \ ~ .per '~` ~ ~.~• x>• 3c i •:~ 9 ~,'~ ~ -, ~ ''• 2 ` x.00 ~ ~ ~ ,/~ _1Lp' C7J3_~ __.s_ ;~'}~~ _ .T ~ ate' ~ ~~~ ~ ~r-. %; 4 ~ sM ury p CC7 - i ~~ ~ ~'' • r1 ~ ' '~ •• •/ . ~. 't e .3 ~0 _ ~ •-~o' l -~'y~ ~ ~ 6 a To ]~~ M E ~°v ~v~ o M of ~~ Q. !~ pho ~0 n TECEPArea\) CgCCE p TONED Umber WqN ~SEEyOU PCEq fxte~s~nn T S T U SEE YpU W/CC SE cACL McSSa RETURNED Vov tIRGENTCC AGA/N ?~ 9e ~ ' R CgCC ~~ ~' E~CIEN~y® RFpRD~ # 23 BOG Number: 395513 Text: 253274 Received• 08/11/94 07:31 Type: Regular Message Subject: Lt. Wade-Resolution From: MEL - Melinda Hill To: MHA - Mary Allen Mary, Just to let you know, I have notified Leonard Wade of the resolution to be done at the board meeting on the 23rd and he will be there. I will take care of getting the savings bond. Since he was not here 25 years or more, he will not get a plaque if I remember correctly. Thanks. Melinda O~ gdANp~~ ~ , P (. . 'A ~ G: O 2 J .ate 1838 ~ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES MEMORANDUM TO: Jack McCorkle Assistant Chief of Police FROM: Melinda HiII~L~'`~" ~~" Personne~ss`t DATE: August 3, 1994 SUBJECT: Board Resolution -Leonard J. Wade Retirement Please find attached a draft resolution for the recognition of Lt. Leonard Wade's retirement and years of service. Please review this draft resolution and contact Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors, with any additional information or changes you would like to suggest by August 15, 1994. This resolution is on the agenda for the Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for August 23, 1994. Please let. me know if you have any questions. c: Mary Allen <__ _ 9RAFT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON August 23, 1994. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO Leonard J. Wade FOR 20 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY. WHEREAS, Leonard J. Wade was first employed in February of 1974 as a Deputy Sheriff; and as a Police Officer-Lieutenant; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Leonard J. Wade for 20 years and 6 months of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. ~ WHEREAS, while employed with the Coun Roanoke Coun ~' he served with distinction on the ty Transportation and Safety Commission; and WHEREAS, for several yeas-s he was the comman Enforcement Unit under both the Sheriff ding °fficer of the q~~, Law s Department and the Police Department; and WHEI~S, Leonard J. Wade, through his em to been inst P Yment with Roanoke County has rumental in impro~g the quality of life for its citizens tt~ i ~'~i ~ ~ CEO 1i1/~/,~ ~ e 5~ QG~Qri ~/ D/7 S /)')Gt.. ~•~z ~ aO ~- Z .A POANOkF POLICE cOUN'~y John H. Cease Chief of Police Roanoke County Police Department June 27, 1994 -e%~-Qa- retiring after serving 37 to you and the personne employee of Roanoke C ~~~~ known to many law enfc welcome others with wh ~ - ~ - ~f ~~ n ~ ,,. .Y.c..t:#.,~.c p t ~' ~ ~ ~ rig `f- ~,..k~ ~~~ ~ a -~.~ r.~ r ~;, ,. 3568 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Office: 703/561-8071 Fax: 703/561-8114 Roanoke County Admir ~~~_~~ ~ ' 5204 Bernard Drive, SV v~ -~ • 1~~~"v Roanoke, ti A 24018 ~ a _ i - 7 -~! ~~. w Greetings: ~~~ ~~ On July 31 1994 Lieute a D o numbers for those Intere ' information sheet for your personnel and spread the word of this exceptional accomplishment. Enclosed is an informati~ ~ ~,.~ C ~ _ a ~ 1~~°S'o D ~ /© Thank you for your assistance in handling this m. p ~ ~/~, your associates on July 31,1994. ~~ ~. Sincerely, John H. Cease Chief of Police JHClcI enclosure A NATIONALLY ACCREDITED AGENCY 8- ~ -3 P ~-~'' ~r =_-` ~`~ y ~ ~,'i /i "FIRST IN SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA" RETIREMENT CELEBRATION! ! ~~~ ~ Who: Lieutenant Leonard J. Wade When: Sunday, July 31, 1994 beginning at 4:00 p.m. and continuing to 10:00 p.m. (An awards presentation and "roast" is planned for 6:00 p.m.) Where: Blueberry Hill Restaurant and Lounge, 5301 Williamson Road N.W., Roanoke Va. (At the intersection of Williamson Road and Hildebrand Rd.) What: Retirement Celebration, to include finger foods, coffee, and tea. A cash bar will be available for any interested. Music (by DJ) and dancing from 7:00 to 10:00 p.m. Costs: Adults $6.00 per person, Children under 12 free. Dress: Casual Contact: Sharon Brown 561-8036 or Terrell Holbrook 561-8061 or 561-8066 for additional information or reservations. RESERVATIONS ARE REQUIRED AND CAN BE MADE THROUGH JULY ~~ios 3~gyr~' C-~ DRAFT AT A REGULAR LDE AT GTHE TROANOKED COUNTYERADMINISTRATOONO CENTER TON VIRGINIA, HE August 23 1994. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO Leonard J. Wade FOR 20 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY. WHEREAS, Leonard J. Wade was first employed in February of 1974 as a Deputy Sheriff; and as a Police Officer-Lieutenant; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Leonard J. Wade for 20 years and 6 months of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. ~' WF-iERFAS, while employed with the County he serve Roanoke Coun d with distinction on the ty Transportation and Safety Commission; and WHER~S, for several years he was the commandin Enforcement Unit g officer of the Auxiliary Law under both the Sheriffs Depar~ent and the police De WHEREAS, Leonard J. Partment; and Wade, through his employment with Roanoke Coun been instrumental in unprovin ty has g the quality of life for its citizens. ~l~/ZG~ ~p~`oQ ~ ~ L~/ tv i~ Cho ~~. /e e ~ /~c:.. ~-~z -~ 1.R0[3EItT RIIUDY Vice President July 22, 1994 Mr. Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Administrator P. ~. BOX 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Elmer: TEL: 703/977-7777 ~A;C: 703/977-7700 - ;` .< . ~.; ; I am writing you to discuss a condition on the Domestications project that was not anticipated by Hanover Direct when we drafted our agreement earlier this year. As you recall, Hanover originally planned to purchase 54 acres from Friendship Manor. Under the earlier plan, Roanoke County agreed to extend a water line to our property which we felt was sufficient. We then had to move our site by purchasing the Hinman property and the Anglin property. This created a relocation of our facility further south on Hollins road. The current plans for the water extension now leave it approximately 600 feet short, which has been estimated to cost approximately $30,000, of the anticipated pump station. It is my understanding that Roanoke County intends to eventually extend this same water line completely to Plantation Road through an easement to be granted by Hanover Direct. In our original agreement, Hanover agreed to invest certain capital dollars for our project. This investment was used to calculate payback to Roanoke County for their investments in infrastructure, such as the water extension. Specifically, Hanover agreed to invest a minimum within three years the following: Land and Building $ 7,000,000 Capital Equipment 3,000,000 Computers and Software 2,000.000 Total $12,000,000 Additionally, Hanover agreed to construct a facility of at least 450,000 square feet. IIANOVER DIREC'T', INC. UNC AVERY IZOW, ROANOKE, VA. 2Q012 Page 2 These investments were used in calculations for payback to Roanoke County for their incentives and investments in the future. I am requesting that Roanoke County extend the water line to the location as determined by your engineers and Avis Construction to best serve Hanover Direct. For this consideration, Hanover Direct is willing to have the performance agreement with Roanoke County amended to reflect additional capital investment of $1,500,000 to the land and building guarantee. This should more than adequately meet Roanoke County's requirement for payback. Thank you for your consideration and assistance in this matter. Sincerely, ~~ ~/ .Robert Rhudy Vice President, Operations JRR/aa cc: Michael Racano Michael Sherman Brian Duncan ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER --J - ~=x~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 23, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Utility Billing Procedures nl , ~? _ F r;:..~ ,.- ~~- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors directed staff to explore changes to the Utility Billing procedures. A team was formed to review current procedures and suggest changes. The following is a summary of suggestions for the Board's review. In addition, we have included a table with proposed changes, current policies, and Roanoke City's policies for comparison purposes; and, a draft ordinace is attached for your review. Initial Service Fee: The team recommends an initial fee of $25.00 when service is started. Currently, there is no charge for starting service. An initial service fee is to cover costs associated with starting a customer's account. If a customer moves within the County an initial fee would be charged each time service is started at a new address. v ~.. ~«.,•w~%~ t+-c,ccr+~»~ ~ ~~ Deposits: For s~e~l' customers, no deposit would be charged when service is started. A deposit would be charg~ to restore service after being disconnected for non-payment of an account balance. A second deposit would be charged to restore service the second time a customer is disconnected for non-payment. No additional deposits would be imposed after a second deposit is collected. I~ _, Deposits for residential customers would be the customer's las bill amount. This deposit policy would be uncomplicated and a policy easily explainable to the cuers. It would link the deposits with the customer's usage. It would eliminate the possible inequity of requiring a larger deposit for a customer that has traditionally used a smaller amount. In addition, it w ul n require a large ount of staf ~. , time to do manual calculations if averages were used. ~~;'~'. - `~ Deposit amounts for commercial accounts would remain the same as they are now. The team recommends capping the amount of deposits for commercial accounts. As with residential customers m:\finance\common\board\8-23-94.wpd whose deposits are capped to reflect a potential bill worth six months of service, the team felt a cap that reflects the same time period should be used. Thus, commercial accounts have deposits capped at six. Refunding of Deposits: The team recommends against refunding deposits. There is the equity issue of prior customers never paying an initial service fee and new customers being charged an initial service fee. As the policy stands now, t p 'or customers that have deposits with Roanoke County will receive a credit against their fi ills w en service is discontinued. The team felt it would be more equitable to prior and future ust mer o leave the prior customers under the old policy. - The County has approximately $300,000 in deposits. If this were refunded, there would be the costs of refunding, loss of interest income used to offset rates, loss of cash that is used to reduce short term borrowing, and possible bond covenant consequences relating to maintaining a certain level of cash balances. }~~~ ~'_" Disconnection and Reconnection Fees: Customers that have service disc ected for nonpayment will be required to pay a fee of $20.00 to cover the cost to the County for isconnecting service. If the customer is reconnected to the system, an additional fee of $~6~ will be charged. These charges will be applicable each time a customer is disconnected. This policy change would address some concerns regarding customers paying the cost of actual disconnections and reconnections. he second' fee would not be charged if a customer does not reconnect to the system. ~ f- ;J ~' ~'`~ C~ ' FISCAL IMPACT: ~-~ b , J r ~. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To () ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohinke _ Minnix Nickens m:\finance\common\board\8-23-94.wpd p'~ ~~~ -np r ~ ~ mo -a cn omo ~ cn n m m ~, ~ v m sv v con ~ o n u ~ .-. o ~ ~ p Vi C7 _ ~ cn o (D (~D (~D ° -+ Z ~ o ~ CD ~ N 2 2 D -~ ~ ~ i c ~ 3 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ 3 ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ cn m ~n o ~ m m ~ Z `< ~ m 2 o ~ rn . ° u ~ ~ ~ n m ~ c ~ ~ o ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' N -' ~ ~ m ..' ~ 7 ~ -' ~ C)'1 ffl ~ p N ~ ~ O ~ O~ ~ O O ~ n O ~ ~ --s CJi nom ~ ~ ~ -O O CJ~ O Q ~ , ~ m rn ~ O ° r ~ ~ ~ ~ cu v ° n ~ m m ~ ~~ < Q- ~ N D ~~ oo ~ n o ~ _ ~ ~ (D - O- ca ~ o p O ' O ,~ O O ~, N O n~ O O c ~ 5 ~ '0 Q~•~~ ~~ ° z e n v O o ~ o_~'o c~ ~ m ° ° ~ cn ~ cn o m -~ v ~,m~~ o ~ ' oo ~ ~ o ~ v O o Q m a ~ Z p << o~~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ o o , o - ~' ~ 3 ~c m '~ o ~~ ~ c° ~ o N ~ a o p r ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ n. c°n ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ m ~ C7 , m ~ ~ ~ ~ O .-. Q- o c~ D N o ~ Z =., ~ o r n < ~~ ~ ° O ~ N~~Q- m m ~<'-' o c~ o C7 ~ o 0 0 o ~~~ c o cn p rnm~~ on ~ vm~hcn. ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ N < ~ (D ~ ~ ~ ~• Sv ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ '~ O ~ Z c~ CD < ~ Q Q ' p ~ (D {fl cn O ~ Q n ~ {yq N m ~ - o c~ Q ' ~ ~~ o ~ ~ c o m o n i ~~ ~ n ~ 0 0 0 0 ~~~.~ o Q~c~°~ ~m ~ ~~~v~ ~ (D ~ ~ (D ~ ''` (p O (D ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q p N C fn O f D a ~O n ~ ~G .~- CD N ~~ ~ D Z c n `. o - ~ m O m D C7 O z O C m Z --~ O m v z v C7 -~ -C-I r ---I -G rn D v m '~