Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/11/1994 - Regular0~ ROANp~.~ ~. z '~ J ? a ~3 C~~~xx~#~ .~~ ~..~~xz~.~~.e ROANOKE COUN'T'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA OCTOBER 11,1994 rawrr o na ru r~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public bearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement In order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored 6y Roanoke County, p/ease contact the Cleric to the Board at (703) T72-200 We request that you provide at /east 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may he made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:06 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS SALEM (31 ~ a~yded Faper C. PROC:IAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract on Behalf of the County of Roanoke with the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Botetourt, and the Town of Vinton. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-101194-1 BLT MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AUTHORIZING EXECU'T'ION OF CONTRACT URC SHOULD BE DONE AT SAME TIMEFRAME. 2. A-101194-2 FM MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-BI:J FGK~FM,LBE NAYS-HCN 3. A-101194-3 BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE URC a Williamson Road (Terry Harrington, 2 CITIZENS SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF MASTER PLAN E. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution On the to Transfer Bond Funds to Schools (John Chambliss, Assistant County Request for Approval for Land Acquisition. Administrator) Request for Funds to Implement Community Design Master Plan. Director of Planning & Zoning) 2 Issuance of General Obligation School Bonds in the Estimated Maximum Amount of $3,200,000 to Finance Certain Capital Projects for School Purposes. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) R-101194-4 BI+T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC NO CITIZENS SPOKE F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on the Proposed Design of the Roanoke County Strategic Vision Process. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) WORK SESSION SET FOR 10/25/94 G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE IL FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of 3.5009 Acres of Land from Salem Stone Corporation in Connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/25/94 URC 2. Ordinance Authorizing Exchange of Real Estate Between Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. and the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BI.J MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 3 2ND - 10/25/94 URC 3. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Extending Along Spring Grove Drive Across Stonebridge Park. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/25/94 AYES-EGK„FM,HCN,LBE ABSTAIN-Bl T 4. Ordinance Amending Section 9-16, Incorporation of Statewide Fire Prevention Code and Section 9-21. Amendments of Article II. Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code of Chapter 9, Fire Prevention and Protection and Section 12-51 Penalties for Parkin Violations of Article III. Parking of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code is Order to Adopt the Latest Edition of This Code and to Increase Certain Permit Fees and Fines. (Donald Gillispie, Fire Marshal) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PH - 10/25/94 URC 5. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance No. 2308 Which Grants to Boothe American Company of Detroit, Michigan, D/B/A Salem Cable TV, the Right to Erect, Construct, Operate and Maintain a Community Antenna Television (CATV) System. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PH - 10/25/94 URC 4 I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Drainage Easement from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-101194-5 FM MOTION TO APPROVE URC 2. 0-101194-6 FM MOTION TO APPROVE URC 3. Ordinance Vacating and Closing an Unimproved Portion of Right-of--Way Known as Creek Circle, Along the Eastern Side of Misty Forest Subdivision. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-101194-7 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of a 4.41 Acre Parcel of Real Estate Known as Ogden Community Center Located at 2932 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) ~~ OVER iJ1V1'IL AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION HCN MOTION TO DEFER ACTION UW J. APPOINT1ViENTS NONE Ordinance Authorizing Quit-Claim and Release of Sanitary Sewer Easement within Boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and Located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 5 NEW AIRPORT COMD~IISSION APPOINTEE ARTHUR WHITTAKER WAS PRESENT AND EXPRESSED APPRECIATION FOR BEING APPOINTED, K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTIIVE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY, R-101194-8 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH ITEM R 3 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE AND REVISION TO RESO IN ITEM R-5 URC 1. A-101194-8.a 2. R-101194-8.b 3. R-101194-8.c BDT MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-BL-T F-GICFM,IiCN MANDATE) 4. A-101194-S.d Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. Request from American Shows for Resolution of Support to Establish a National "Green Day". Request from the Virginia Association of Counties Resolution of Support for Constitutional Amendment 2. for Donation of a Water Line Easement at Chateau Mont Condominiums. 6 5. Request from Appalachian Power for Resolution of Support for Boat Restrictions Upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. R-101194-8.e 6. Request for Statement of Support for Locating the National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford, or County of Bedford. A-101194-8.f 7. Request for Acceptance of Hidden Woods Drive, Fairway Ridge Road, and Hidden Woods Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-101194-8. 8. Request for Acceptance of Camney Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-101194-8.h 9. Request for Acceptance of Chester Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-101194-8.i L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ~u ~~~sur vnnson: t Announced he read article in RT&WN on ridgeline protection and that uhoto of Summit Apts. is in Roanoke City not r'nnnly l.nt I.e ., a ~L working with Game and Inland Fisheries Dept. - - -- residents on Tan lewood Lane are experiencing power outages. Asked ECH to contact APCO to investigate. Supervisor Nickens: (11 Announced he visited the old landfill and is amazed and impressed with the progress. (21 Asked about the Fire and Rescue Volunteer Coordinator osition. ECH advised that interviews were conducted and that he antici ates the osition will be filled b 10 24 94. Supervisor Eddv: (11 Received VACo voting credentials for EGK and asked MHA to fill out and send to VACo. 2 Asked whether staff is workin on VRS increases for County retirees. ECH responded staff is back report at 10/25!94 meeting. (3) Advised vthat the Governor's 1 Strike Force is holdin public hearing this evening at Va. Western. Suggested sending wntten comments since County has no information on recommendations yet M• CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COI~IlVIiJ1VICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS BIJ 1VIOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Fire and Rescue Reaction/IZesponse Times -August 1994 5. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 6. Receipt of Industrial Development Authority Audit O. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS ADMINISTRATION FOR ANSWERS, P- WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to Review Proposed Standards for Residential Stormwater Management Facilities Program. BOARD CONSENSUS THAT STAFF BRING BACK REPORT AND DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE USE OF GENERAL FUNDS NEW POSITION OR NEW VEHICLE IN ARY 1995. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) To Discuss the Location of a Prospective Business or Industry; To discuss disposition of publicly held real estate, agenda Item I-4, Section 2.1-344 A (3); To discuss disposition of publicly held real estate located in the City of Salem, Section 2.1-344 (a) (3) HCN MOTION TO GO INTO E + SESSION AT 5:20 P.M. URC R. CERTIFICATION OF E + SESSION R-101194-9 CERTIFICATION RESO AT 6:05 P.M. URC HCN MOTION TO DEFER ACTION ON ITEM I-4 _ UW S. ADJOURN1ylCNT FM MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 6:05 P.M. UW 9 ,,_. ~ P ~N a ~ p C~.aixx~tg ~f ~~~x~~~.~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA OCTOBER 11, 1994 lEAfl 011E t(t !~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772 2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. E. F. G. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract on Behalf of the County of Roanoke with the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Botetourt, and the Town of Vinton. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Request for Approval to Transfer Bond Funds to Schools for Land Acquisition. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) 3. Request for Funds to Implement a Williamson Road Community Design Master Plan. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution On the Issuance of General Obligation School Bonds in the Estimated Maximum Amount of $3,200,000 to Finance Certain Capital Projects for School Purposes. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on the Proposed Design of the Roanoke County Strategic Vision Process. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of 3.5009 Acres of Land from Salem Stone Corporation in Connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing Exchange of Real Estate Between Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. and the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Extending Along Spring Grove Drive Across Stonebridge Park. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance Amending Section 9-16, Incorporation of Statewide Fire Prevention Code and Section 9-21. Amendments of Article II. Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code of Chapter 9, Fire Prevention and Protection and Section 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations of Article III. Parking of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code in Order to Adopt the Latest Edition of This Code and to Increase Certain Permit Fees and Fines. (Donald Gillispie, Fire Marshal) 5. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Ordinance No. 2308 Which Grants to Boothe American Company of Detroit, Michigan, D/B/A Salem Cable TV, the Right to Erect, Construct, Operate and Maintain a Community Antenna Television (CATV) System. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent 3 Drainage Easement from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing Quit-Claim and Release of Sanitary Sewer Easement within Boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and Located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Ordinance Vacating and Closing an Unimproved Portion of Right-of--Way Known as Creek Circle, Along the Eastern Side of Misty Forest Subdivision. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of a 4.41 Acre Parcel of Real Estate Known as Ogden Community Center Located at 2932 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) J. APPOINTMENTS K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII..L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. 4 2. Request from American Shows for Resolution of Support to Establish a National "Green Day". 3. Request from the Virginia Association of Counties for Resolution of Support for Constitutional Amendment 2. 4. Donation of a Water Line Easement at Chateau Mont Condominiums. 5. Request from Appalachian Power for Resolution of Support for Boat Restrictions Upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. 6. Request for Statement of Support for Locating the National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford, or County of Bedford. 7. Request for Acceptance of Hidden Woods Drive, Fairway Ridge Road, and Hidden Woods Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Request for Acceptance of Camney Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 9. Request for Acceptance of Chester Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COD~IlVIENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 5 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Fire and Rescue. Reaction/Response Times -August 1994 5. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 6. Receipt of Industrial Development Authority Audit O. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS P. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to Review Proposed Standards for Residential Stormwater Management Facilities Program. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) To Discuss the Location of a Prospective Business or Industry. R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION S. ADJOURNMENT 6 [ 2 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLIITION 101194-1 APPROVING AND AIITHORIZING THE EBECIITION OF THE REGIONAL SEWAGE TREATMENT CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE WITH THE CITY OF ROANORE, THE CITY OF SALEM, THE COIINTY OF BOTETOIIRT AND THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, the parties to this contract desire to protect the health and well-being of their citizens, the community and its environment, and to dispose of the waste by-products of the community in a safe and efficient manner sharing costs and benefits; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is necessary to upgrade and expand the regional sewage plant and interceptors, to provide for the mutual sharing of the capital funding for this expansion and upgrade, and to establish the necessary relationships between the parties for the operation, maintenance, capacity allocation, and future needs of these joint use facilities; and, WHEREAS, certain agreements executed in 1972 must be amended to accomplish the upgrade and expansion of these joint use facilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the contract between the City of Roanoke, the County of Botetourt, the County of Roanoke, the City of Salem and the Town of Vinton, which provides for the upgrade and expansion of the regional sewage treatment plant and interceptor lines, the sharing of capital funding, and the establishment of the necessary relationships between the parties for the operation, maintenance, 1 t capacity allocation, and future needs of these joint use facilities, is hereby accepted and approved. 2. That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute this contract on behalf of the citizens and Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, subject to the review and approval of the final contract by the County Administrator and County Attorney. 3. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to mail a certified copy of this resolution to the Clerks for the City Councils of the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem, the Town Council for the Town of Vinton and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Botetourt. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-1 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. .~. Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 ACTION ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract on Behalf of the County of Roanoke with the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Botetourt, and the Town of Vinton COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. This has been along time in the making but we have made significant improvements over the existing contract and we have been able to get the additional capacity that is needed in both the plant and the interceptors. We agreed to an amount greater than the calculated distributed cost because we will be the greatest user of the Sewage Treatment Plant in the years to come. This was acceptable to us in order to address the present and future needs, correct some of the deficiencies that we find in the existing contract, and to move ahead for all the localities involved. Kit Kiser should be commended for getting additional capacity during wet weather conditions which gave aU of us greater usage of the plant than we would have otherwise. We are the first locality in Vrginia to receive this two-tier approval and it was at the urging of Kit Kiser that we were able to do so. Other localities have already or are addressing this issue this week. We are planning fora signing ceremony by the chief elected o,,~cials to approve this within the next few weeks as quickly as we can schedule it with the other localities. I appreciate your support of the sta,~"s e,,~`orts to negotiate this and think that it is in the best interests of all of us to move forward at this time. BACKGROUND: The above parties agree that it is necessary to upgrade the regional sewage treatment plant and major interceptor lines. These improvements will allow for continued growth in the Valley and protect the health and environment of its citizens. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The parties have been negotiating since 1990 on the extent of the improvements needed and how costs for these improvements would be allocated. In August 1993 all parties agreed in principal to a new contract to replace the existing 1972 contract and how the costs for the necessary capital improvements would be shared. ~- The contract has since gone through various drafts to clarify how the previously agreed to items would be carried out. The staff of all involved localities now feel that we have the best possible agreement for our respective citizens. ALTERNATIVES• (1) The Board of Supervisors would authorize approval of the attached resolution. This alternative would cost the sewer customers of Roanoke County an estimated $12.35 million and if enacted with the other parties will allow the project to proceed. (2) The Board of Supervisors would reject the proposed contract and request staff to negotiate the contract further. This alternative would delay the necessary improvements and could have a major impact on future growth in the Valley FISCAL IMPACT• The Board of Supervisors took action on June 28, 1994 to increase connection fees and sewer user charges to finance these improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution authorizing the execution of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke with the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Botetourt and the Town of Vinton. SUBMITTED BY: l ~l~e~ Gary R bertson, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~-i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE REGIONAL SEWAGE TREATMENT CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE, THE CITY OF SALEM, THE COUNTY OF BOTETOURT AND THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, the parties to this contract desire to protect the health and well-being of their citizens, the community and its environment, and to dispose of the waste by-products of the community in a safe and efficient manner sharing costs and benefits; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is necessary to upgrade and expand the regional sewage plant and interceptors, to provide for the mutual sharing of the capital funding for this expansion and upgrade, and to establish the necessary relationships between the parties for the operation, maintenance, capacity allocation, and future needs of these joint use facilities; and, WHEREAS, certain agreements executed in 1972 must be amended to accomplish the upgrade and expansion of these joint use facilites. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the contract between the City of Roanoke, the County of Botetourt, the County of Roanoke, the City of Salem and the Town of Vinton, which provides for the upgrade and expansion of the regional sewage treatment plant and interceptor lines, the sharing of capital funding, and the establishment of the necessary relationships between the parties for the operation, maintenance, 1 ~-i capacity allocation, and future needs of these joint use facilities, is hereby accepted and approved. 2. That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute this contract on behalf of the citizens and Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, subject to the review and approval of the final contract by the County Administrator and County Attorney. 3. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to mail a certified copy of this resolution to the Clerks for the City Councils of the City of Roanoke and the City of Salem, the Town Council for the Town of Vinton and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Botetourt. 2 ,~ A-101194-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October i1, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Transfer of Bond Funds to School for Land Acquisition COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ EXECUTIVE SUN~MARY The 1993 General Obligation Bonds included $750,000 for a new Cave Spring High School site in the County portion of the bonds. Previously, $275,000 of this amount was appropriated to the County School Board to cover the purchase of land related to this site. On August 25, 1994, the Roanoke County School Board authorized the exercise of an option for the purchase of 11.10 Acres designated on the County Tax Maps as parcel #97.01-2-11 in the amount of $130,000. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this purchase and transfer bond monies to the School Account to cover the purchase price. FISCAL IMPACT' This transfer of bond proceeds will have no fiscal impact on the County since the debt service related to this bond issue is currently included in the FY 1994-95 budget. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends reappropriating $130,000 from the County portion of the 1993 bond proceeds to the School portion of the 1993 proceeds for the purchase of land related to the new Cave Spring High School site and that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of the parcel known as tax map number 97.01-2-11 as authorized by the Roanoke County School Board on August 25, 1994. .~ ~- a Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chamb ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodg Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: H._Odell Mnn;x to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) approve Eddy Received ( ) Johnson ~_ Referred ( ) Kohinke ~ To ( } Minnix _~_ Nickens ~_ cc Dr. Gordon Diane Hyatt John Willey Paul Mahoney File John M. Chambliss, Jr. ~~ NORTH 6.73 Ac 9 .00 tc \,_ i' 8 znac 5693 / i 369 ` 1• O /~~~~ ~ Set Mop 97.05 /~ ~ ?~ I" = 100' ,~ !!! 6S ~ `` ' I ~\ „• 10.80 Ac ?'°:''-• ~t Fr 4 ~ k~ ~ / r ,_yn~'~' r""~- ~~'~~) I m~'~',. r' :> a +c.'; 4 q' M • ' y z ~r .fi ~' ~ ` 6397 p t , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6600 ~ Ai I 12 c 8.3a AC t~ f "I "~ ` I ~~ .. E •:w 67 `wp OSt E~ StMj,1 \ON~ 1 ~ g° ~_ 13 ' ' 3 \ 1'91 Ac I R.CBS 666i~ Z ' I ~~ 1I \ _~ ~ _ \ 51 S64 Ac ~* 5 ' ?CF. Tonw LU -~ 10 e ~ t.oa a 12 6633 9 14 Loo Ac cov N13 '•SOar1D 99 IS 17 St.i2 Ac (D 40.48 Ac (C ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY Approval of Transfer of Bond Funds to School for DEPARTMENT Land Acquisition A-101194-3 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . '`-r" '"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October il, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funding for Williamson Road Community Design Master Plan. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I urge you to authorize the expenditure of these funds jor the Williamson Road Conununity Design Master Plan. Hollins College is one of our most important assets and is an attraction for students from out of state, business people who attend meetings at the college and to the business that are in that area. We are working with the community for improvements in landscaping, signage and exterior appearances of the buildings. This has been requested by a number of businesses in the area. If success we would like to do something similar in other areas of the County such as the Tanglewood area, the Hanging Rock area, and the Town of Parton. These an our "main streets" and we should take pride in them. Recommend apprnva~ County staff has been working with property owners, business owners, representatives of Hollins College, and residents of the Williamson Road (Hollins Area) to discuss the character of the road improvements currently underway, and to discuss ways that the visual image and economic character of the corridor can be improved. Our discussions have focused not only on improvements within the right-of-way, but also on ways that improvements to private property can be used to create a cohesive image in this important commercial corridor. Discussions have focused on parking lot treatments, building facades, site landscaping and signage. In addition to its economic importance, the corridor also serves as the principal gateway to the historic and architecturally significant Hollins College campus. As a component of the road improvement plans, Hollins College has currently retained the services of a professional landscape architect and design firm to redesign the main entrance to the Campus, and also to address landscape design issues for the other properties owned by Hollins in the corridor. These properties include properties adjacent to the campus, and also properties on the other side of the road (i.e., student housing area). A consensus exists among the participants in this process that great benefits can be derived from the preparation and implementation of a master plan design for the entire corridor. The master plan would be inclusive of areas along Williamson Road from its intersection with Peter's Creek Road extending to the Botetourt ~- 3 2 County line. Included would be streets such as Plantation Road. location of area.) areas along major intersecting (See attached map for approximate The preparation of such a plan would require the design services and expertise of a firm specializing in landscape architecture and urban design. The plan would be prepared using significant involvement of business owners, property owners, customers, and residents of the area. One important element of the plan preparation process would be the establishment of a "storefront office" in the corridor area, where interested persons could stop in to offer their design ideas for the corridor. It is estimated that the cost for the preparation of such a plan would not exceed $20,000. Once prepared, and agreed to by the community, the master plan will serve as a long-term guide for improvement to the area. Staff has discussed and research various proposals for possible public- private partnerships to fund the implementation of the plan. These include the use of ISTEA funds, the creation of a possible special assessment district, or the establishment of a program based upon the tax increment financing legislation that exists in the Virginia Code. SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: This is a proposal for Roanoke County to fund the preparation of a Corridor Design Plan for the Williamson Road (Hollins Area) corridor. If approved by the Board, the services of a professional landscape planning and design firm would be obtained. This firm, working in conjunction with Roanoke County and the Williamson Road community, would prepare a master plan that would be used as a future guide for improvements in the corridor. FISCAL IMPACT• The fiscal impact of this proposal would not exceed $20,000. Sufficient funds exist within the Board of Supervisors contingency fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors authorize and fund the preparation of a Williamson Road Corridor Master Plan. 3 Respectfully Submitted, .-, ~. ~ Terrance L. Harrin on, AICP Director of Planni g and Zoning Approved, D~~(~ Elmer C. Hodge g- County Administrator Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy to approve Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs x x X x x cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance --~ \,~r--!:° `'D •/ ~~ j ~ TiNKER /~10UNTAIN \ ~ - w . j ~•;. CLC:!E.?G j • `\\• I~ i CtOvER 1RAYf` 1_: 1 / / i p ~ I ~ ANT/DUE N4RT' -. ~ • ~ v ~ 1 Nil;.: IC:K_ f _ ~~`~ 815 1\\\ ~ _ ~ ; ~ vE~(2~t~ ,~ ~ / .j,,. • ~ ~ `~ i \ ~ :~1 A ~'- nr: r~~7tln., ;, ~,,.Ea.~t~15+T ;~_y~--'" ~ / ~~~/L 7Er \ ( Ir io `' lRA;L ER GaR,K PLAT, r ~ ~~ ~-, y• Notuws ~ ~ i `~ c .• _ - ~ I ::. S ~~ -~ ~' Cc E " ~ Rf1RE0~ G •i '~-•~" r -1 _____________________.________L ^` -PAS _~Lq C ~ F9; r ~~4~ ~N, ~,, pgl. \~'~ 5 / gin. `, ~Er .~ • UNAIIAGE - ~5~~~ ~- %T10RTHBURU `..'tAIJZ~D~Cf~F ~-~ r~_c Q w. o~ J// e~'~` ~. MS~ ~~ "`C:J~ ~/ .~~L~~'9 \~~,w•~' ~,' ~'~ b' l r;~ rLrN` O _.. _~,~ tt ,PC'!1 i `~ 713 ~'*~v ^ //. '\'y0 fi'9°®\.~. ~ •,\na~' y4gy~.. ~y<`E'-'` J PYDR~RG'c`rpN "' j p9 ~ ~.~inKe. ~~'r 605 ~ _ %~'`\ • Fkf' ~,.ssi ~~ V ~ ,/ )5 ;DEG'-"~ n` I. ~ i ~••M"'4°at CJ ~ .;.sr 13 :~ ~\ A9~wUE Po,~~tq~, ~`F~~~rTb N c ~,w 'l.~o F r` 2 a ~r I'gOST RM~ Fo,~ / .~'E ~W \ ' .. ~ ~ GOl 4a. ' \~Iq~ ~t• ~`P , : \ \ P1~ P o Rr N ~~L `N.n~ ~ ~ ~,.~Rto '~ ~ o / 4~ a~"' \ :¢ ot~C ~a /~:vfsw. .. ~c: ~ Q ~AR~.~is/,'E~'R~ya J 4v \\ ,4. -,t~O~Y _: ,. Q ~ ~ `•,~ °• 'i, \ %i / i• RD ZS OR. ~ q v`*s~` 1511 tAv \\ ~~`~~ V.> .j:iwr'~r<d •la:.=;w ~PERO ". Gi ~, \,xeo~DR ;8 emawr ~__/NSti 6 IEW` O,. /• R ~ ~,~ ccvrf: ~J• EAN ~ J - _M~%. ~~ sT.;, rp,f Q i ~ ~/ ~, nr~r 'itz '~` w:;wat~t~ - ~ -w~'~~ o . ~ ~ ~ \~O Q~ ,5 ~ S -~ ~• C ,,~~yy~`E.. ~ ~c /. s~\~, ~ 1 ¢°- SUMMERDEAN 4,,r ~ ~I -- ~ % -" '9 ' 4N05 ~ , '~~ / \yvy a (fR:r.:~sN a.~: oR/ \~ £ 9 ~ YBROOK VlQ I ~~' '~~ ¢• - I -.. ' ~~ I ~ ` da ~ ~ SUMMER ' ~~ ~ ` ~tQ T: ~ O f ;260 ? .,300' O~,' J ~ LAK~YIEW p ~ ~ y . ,r Yaro•:c ~ '^fy~ g ~' 1 tie •' :r~ .t _ \` ~-- gWAPTS ~ N w I o I ~~ zrF^ . - rtttY ~ cRR° ~ Sr 1 ~! = c . ~ ~ ~:~"' pD $ ~ ~ ewe'e "'v ._115 ~~P ~ ~ ! / F~ ,l`' '~aY $'«N ¢(Y ` MP swor•~vs NECK+E ~, P C reo ~ O j ._'i _c~ Dom. 3 rfa ~ ENT Poi pR p!c/ tR ? tSY "' PV .•• .rt~5 4 ~ . ,6 " ~~ Rp nwoorsrof D N ~ O ~ •;fi~0 ~ \, -. (" t aMSruR T.q` '^ i ?I ,OPETTY~ ~ 8 vuouvT,vv ' 6OI ~?~'~ i Y/ C~'~'"/ CO \e=oarv F ! ~ S AE' f/fA/S°f. ~ p, r~ ~ 4A`T'ryNj>E G ~ '~ia~i •. Y ~ ~ • gs \ ~ ~ uoo ~'.~~ // ~ 5 ~PTAIN' E uce ~ ~ ~.. s tF' FOR ¢~~~ ~/ ~ ~ v / / -/ ' ~ j~ '~ ~ ~ R 14 n °"~ o ilk - " -+S °` ~ ~~yt/ of, 616 Z ~` O _^ '. y~ _ ~S'- / ~~• I h c :/ ~ FA °" j~...c_ --_ -_y_GTdj3t`-j~~.. _ ____ y--_______I _' ~-¢ IL GPe ~~ /'~/ Y~IR~Sr va. ~ o~,yag ~r• ~ i C/~~/ ~ I > I - M.ES z 2-=% /'/~~ i'~ +°'ma~`"~` ~ ~~~' HILL "~=~~~ RN -O -- ~ r1 ._._'_ ---- dam! / I r/~ ~" _ fl8 t 'S ~, \ ~ ,p~~ ataAU X09 ~ ;a" r w ~ N J'8 /~ ~ p// -' 605 I , <~~ ~`\ ~. :'- •• ` Yc 't '~ ~ C 9 21~ I ~~'~^_ F~ VISTA AV `^ / /,._„~, - `1~1, --~= 11 yl NI la _ ~ N` t c ~ ERN 4~fW, ;°; ;. '~- ~/ata.a~ar: t,, N,5 i f ! -q~ ~ / q{'. ~ - 4,'9r - -~~~,a o's 1' p ! / an roux saR ~uci. ~ P' t~ ~\ ~• ` ._ ~~,.~~``'~:~9 ~ ~/ri~p/~~ 6~~\`N`"P~y l~"a1rf,5\ ~' \\ i ~~F P~~ j~ BELLEWE"g „\\ ~. / _` ~ ~p,~~"fi. ~?'~~ ~K ALE y~ ~~~Y~?_ ~1•'o~r.y`~~^,,~ ~.~ ~ fv... I•~~.~-_*~"~~+iDLLOw "' ~-';~~.K~: ~3 \_ '.` \ N _ _ :._ s ~.~fVY^&I LoPp6 °_. ~ ` ,,~ ~`r t~ Q! ~."yLe~R~r 1 ~ , ~~^G~V~N~VIE~o ~~~F,O MTN ~~ 0.D Y~~~~\.\ \~,}/~ \ ~ ^ K-MART •Y ~~r VA 1~+- ~ ~ ~' 11l 11~yy~y ' .'~' ~! ~ ~fo~yL__~.~._~,r-. ~ ~F~, \`\ G ~ \ r~ II CY~tIfWP, s=E>tr4 ' AV """VV LYuxuuu a ~~ /~ ~~f ~ i~~~Kt\N y~*rf.-"_ '\ 4 1` J Jam. •1 p FR=..T`Ira~_ p. / >/ .~~,1PC~ DF ' J.. ` /f\\~q~ \ J ~ EpG a -:~ ~~.-~ - - PaF°$ 9~ f~R I~- ; 115. ~•c. r c ~¢ ~4t"Ti s• °e ~\ ;_._<s~ /,.,- ,~ ~ ~N~~B,,..°'E :--~~ i.~~ oPl~ ( ~,I -~1_•' ~~ < »,h~,CT~ ~ r~-`~ fi -_ -- ; ,~ .rh_r.:T._v 1-. v ~ ,~g•, ~`~fAril•+'AC.R-4 ~ :pf ,[~P1L`1A ~~~~~~- ~r~-~fY-~~!'i~P~"`" --- `--~>. ~ •. / t. Epp ~~. ~ ~' ~ ``1, YAPD ~.sc-~E 21 £~fr,cra. h ~ r A ti ~/ y33 a~ P/ ~ 4 2 t ~PL~~~~ , <, { _ _ _ _ RDAwOKE ~ /~ ••\~F,. P S~' /EI~1~~~" •t ~ ~7 Y•_ wUas, AV I i a S e .,. ! . "~JS/d' ! ~ ~C y~,eunE~,wAti ! ( a~!.+, d'. <2„ ~.aw ~~r~i~ P~ V ~o1-T-iw'~.. Av ,~ ' ~Oj~„~~ 750g MDNTEREI~'.j [V~~ 10 ,<, P,tr y,/ce• F5 P AV t ! / sT ~4 f / RD \~ ~ ~d?/~, ~ ~ daP9 fu ~? eP P\4\P+ ,?b Pv (~S,i:i 'R f .~ ~ r ~ ( ~M2 I \ 1 ~~ ~ adl/~ C: \C~ 7 ~ .t CK/ F, pOY iK 1~ ~ ~' ( FS` '. y Vr~.1 !^\j ..Y /; ~. \ _. cam"y~~l 9,y O/ `^, P`~r tP\N~ N ~'P" .br yj I"'1 ~ ' j r r / ~ ~~ `~•+,v. ; ~ ~ ~f~~,}~ oPc?%ry_j~{c•.~ ~ ~ off.'/?+E~'~li~~rir~fy ~iJ 3,,F ~ r !w~ ~I ~ ~rvDHT~F7,~.~v `; ~ ( ..,. _ _ -..~~~~~ ~ _- .. vy0-•PO`! iC~/ C'UO~pSTER~L~`' ij~ir ~'4,y p..`~ y+{ IQ HUNTINGTOpJ C`k HRFTHFlELD _ -_- \\. _.q\~ .1Pj F,S, tl/ eP e;/'&. ~~~~~t'M°w m'!3E ~o ow~OL~Btw !( , • ~•`\ °y~ ,'~. ~~).01~' Q•Pp~(Y ~i P,~3^ 'C ~,ti 47•F!~~f E~~ ~~ ~u.~ ~ LE~ST~,_€R_w,~~1 m ~ ~ / ~ - i °•L° \ r f yid, ~ P, \~ ,F+~~9 ty ` 0.N,w ~~ g~ ~/ "~w~ =~6 ~ ~ / Nt'\, t~ ~i '~ ~ MUFFUNf tPT ,,a (/ .9L = ~~ ,g \C P~~a ~/ CWtjlpEj(c ~~~v ! _ t \\ ftFM-Stv7.' 12 O'./ 9 j[[' 1" ~~z~\ S6 ~{~/ 1+`~ OPO ` '3~ ~y9, ~'f• ~'~ ~! ~!~ ~! \ '.f"P V>~ \ '`c~~tt ~/' :r~r~, ~~:\`C's~la;/ \ C~~c~~' ILLi~RR. .A- il/ ~.~ a~P~nRrux \~~~ -~ 1 i~// ~ Pa /.r".~.' FAIRI~I ? ~ c ~rc. y~ r. ,k-__. ~ - _ .G~t~.R` =n _+ c ~ !~!~ i s 'q~ ~FPaJa° ~ 1 c`•q' tg'.~`'-'"r`' ~7~IN S7S7 ~~~ Py~ . ~,Hd~ >• ~ ~•t ~t \? ~... _ ` ~/~ / ~ Av G ~4,~ ~ r w_ a{ ~E, St c f 7 ,, a o c~, "'~ ._ _ \\ ~y _: __ 5T g .6~/ `E}; \~ ~~DN~R R N 'Glb+Ni iwERrs ~ ~ognl w11~yo~~.~E i o / 0.•crF~" -Tt~ '• ~Y -~fj ' \ _ - ROUND NiL( 1\l~ ~ / JI 1 ~- DOn ,- '/~ y ~61j4"^~ t!~ S g , f fuw, ~'~ a/ ~'- "\:.s`• ~ h 1 y ~ ~ \o,:.`r^u t ~ -- ''' \ ; ~ _ _ ~ ~ °`~+ `. oP% "ES: •"` scw 0 ~ ,~o- \s ~ '~•:' ~Ft ~~~ tE ;~4~E. ~ 1"~•~. ~- $ 5• - - ~ -~- ---- ~~ "~~~ ~ ` ~ !T ~ "~~~.Y~b_ r r":~`'-._~-, ,r,Pi nc%,.` 8 w~~'aa~~I BW~.h1LLS~-s .A-~ir oP/1 .. =~~ ~~. t .~...- / 2.- 23 ,;. 0, . ~'r • fr~ \y ~ \i •~Q~ ~ E. 1 I Av lv, ~ y~ 0. `\N ~ Z •` Qti, _N<N„ ~ ~ c°'P~c r'°fE ~' ~'" ~ < 5~ '~ ~ ,n ow v o, o~ ~ ~ `- ~ fi TATESMQN -. T`+• /, ~. S~OR~ Qe `~ 4 ~rjr ~~~/`Gqf`" 4~~ ~ <<~ ~. „n~lLJf~ o `B ',"~--ttT.,.~.~~. ~~,;,, ~ _/ er P PARK ~•P+. T'p,. ` `. A ~~aa..vt&nr~cE ~s ,1, ~ o%y 4s~~~q''?~^`. a~~0)~~\ o~OPy~~/n~s `9~~~((,~,~ w J% a?ESGUILFDRD D ' +L `Y P.'._'rx. P.~ ,• o~ti4F-~~q 0.EI ~p ~ _ ~: ~/ o - - _ _.. ~a?. Tl, :/.1. -T. .A~ in nD ~ cytr.!ER A„ ; ~.,' $--... -.: 9` - , WI IIIIIillllllll 1111111 llllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIillllllllllllllll IiIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIiIIIIIIIIIiIiIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIiIII,(J AGENDA ITEM NO. -~ `~ A,PPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS J ~R~ t~ l ~ ~ a~~v~ ~r~ ~,Q ~M M cti h ~ ~ ll e s r5 n ~G=s~ ~Q~'1 SUB ECT: _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. ! WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless inst t d b th ~ ruc e y e majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - ^ S Baker will be limited to a P presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained b the Chairman c y . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP _ - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _~ i _ - ~1 ~ _ - ~ - NAME ear --~-~~,r, - -_ - ADDRESS ~ ~~ 3 ~ (~e~-~A- ~~ (~^^~.- ~~ Imo. PHONE `1 '~'~- ~ 3 "~ ~ +l 3b Z - ~ ~ ~ 3 C w - - mlllllllllllllll Illiillllllllillllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllilllllilllllllllilllilllllillllllilllllll~ ~uiiiiiiioiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO:~ - - - - - _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ __ ,- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~/ CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - SUBJECT: ~~~,~ , _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comments WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enfo th l l i ~ rce e ru e un ess nstructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained b the Chairman _ y . _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP __ SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - c _ _ - - - - - ~ i _ _ _ _ - NAME ~ -' ~ ~~ ..~ - - ~ i ADDRESS ~ 2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ .~ ~~~ _ - - - c PHONE ~ l ~ ~ ~ ^ ~~ j - - _ _ _ _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11,1994 RESOLUTION 101194-4 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $3,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Boazd of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $3,200,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code") on October 11, 1994 on the issuance of school bonds in the amount of $3,200,000. WHEREAS the School Boazd of the County has requested by resolution the Boazd to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds The Boazd hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,200,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Boazd hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bond . It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of paz, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Boazd, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement dated as of October 18, 1994 with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1994A"; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning July 15, 1995, (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) in the yeazs (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the annual interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed eight percent (8%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in pazagraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than approximately 20 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in pazagraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty 20 days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. 6. Payment: Pang Agent and Bond Registrar The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall beaz interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. -2- (c) ,Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Pre~avment or Redemption The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive. 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive. 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive.... 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter ................... 100; Pr vi d, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. -3- 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate Non-Arbitrage Certificate The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute aNon-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program• Proceeds Agreement The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. 12. Filing of Resolution.. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on October 11, 1994, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. -4- WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this -day of October, 1994. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk ' Roanoke County Boazd of Supervisors I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-4 adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11,1994. ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Boazd of Supervisors (SEAL) C: Bond Counsel Circuit Court Judge Clerk, School Board County Treasurer Director of Finance -5- Exhibit A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) NO. TR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1994A The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Dollars ($ ), ~ annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 1995 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2014 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year commencing on July 15, 1995 (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Virginia, as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m.. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon fmal payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County aze irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1-227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be -2- levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. On twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public- School Authority, the County.- shall deliver, at its expense, this Bond in marketable form, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the defuutive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are -3- not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive. 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter ............... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. -4- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated November _, 1994. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGII~IIA (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia By Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia -5- ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution on the Issuance of $3,200,000 General Obligation School Bonds to Finance Certain Capital Projects for School Purposes. COUNTY ADMINISTR_ATOR'. COMM .NT4• ~ ~ cy(~-~E~t BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1994, the Board of Supervisors approved the application to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) for $3,200,000 of School bonds to be included in the Fall 1994 bond sale. Attachment A shows the detail of the capital projects that are included in this bond sale. SUMMARY OF INFOR_M_ATION: As part of the closing procedures for the VPSA bond sale the County Board is required to hold a public hearing on this sale. At the conclusion of the public hearing the Board should consider adopting the attached resolution which will be submitted to the VPSA as part of the bond closing papers. The closing date for this sale is scheduled to be on or about November 22, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: The first payment date for these bonds is scheduled for July 15, 1995, therefore, there will not be a fiscal impact for debt service during the current budget year. Funds will be included in the FY 1995-96 budget to pay for the debt service on these bonds. STAFF F OMM .Ni~ATTCIN• Staff recommends at the conclusion of the public hearing the Board will adopt the attached resolution approving the bonds sale of $3,200,000 General Obligation School Bonds to be sold to the VPSA. m:\finance\common\board\10.11-94.wpd October 5, 1994 Respectfully submitted, ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, f~ -~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens m:\finance\common\board\1Q11-94.wpd October 5, 1994 N C - f0 °oa L (A V •'' ~ C N O O U o. Y C w O d. ~ ~ U Q C N L V (0 w Q 0 0~ Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N I~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (p O~ 00 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ M~~ ~--~NMO~M~M~~~OOtnO~ N M N ~ ~ ~~ M ~ C f~ ~ O ~ J ~ ~~ N - N N .r LL J f0 Q ~ ~ ~ a_ > ~ c co ~ o Q, J ~ ~~ t0 - N O ~ ~ J C In O J ~ O ~ O ~+ O (p C ~ ~ 'C N d J ~ M ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ N f0 Q ~ ~~ a ~ c .` oo~n~nooooo ~ ooNr~ooooo O OOfOM00000 ~~ O N N N O N 0 0 0 O.- Mr-~ ~~NMO ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O to M ~ N ~ O O O O O w 0 0 0 O O N O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00 000 °o ° ° ° n o~ n o ~~;~= 0 0 O O O O W Q O C O to O O O C O (n ~ j O UE~ W~ •c~~ _ O ~1 o ~ O ~ ~ p ~ 2 "o `~ v! c 32 ° ~ Q m aw ~ o N~ •• ~ c .m `~ c 2 •c W W o O rn O rn cn cn N o w ~ °-$ ~ ~ a~ a.~.~ ~w o aci~~j~ U _m.~rnUcamcn>,uJ33Uc~o~N 0 0~ .Q Q` O O O~~ j J J 3~ cL, •O ~ 7 L c O-- O D 7 U-- m N }; ~; N- p O 0 0 0 0 ~(~Q~Qm~C7C~U~U~~ZC7~~ZCncnm O O O O O N O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O M --- f Y N a_ U 2 U 0 0 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $3,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $3,200,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code") on October 11, 1994 on the issuance of school bonds in the amount of $3,200,000. WHEREAS the School Board of the County has requested by resolution the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,200,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement dated as of October 18, 1994 with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1994A"; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning July 15, L-I 1995, (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (O.l0o) over the annual interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed eight percent (80) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in paragraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than approximately 20 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty 20 days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. 6. Payment; Paying Agent and Bond Registrar The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such -2- ~- i Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. (c) Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after-July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates .Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive ............. 1030 July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive ............. 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive ............. 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter .......................... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. -3- E 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate; Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program• Proceeds Agreement The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. -4- ~~e 12. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on October 11, 1994, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable~to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. WITNESS Supervisors of the October, 1994. MY HAND and the seal of the Board of County of Roanoke, Virginia, this day of Clerk, Board of the County Virginia (SEAL) of Supervisors of Roanoke, -5- Exhibit A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) NO. TR-1 $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1994A The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Dollars ($ ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 1995 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2014 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year commencing on July 15, 1995 (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. ~') For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Virginia, as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public. School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1-227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, -2- ~~ requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. On twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public School Authority, the County shall deliver, at its expense, this Bond in marketable form, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. -3- L: _ ~ This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: -4- Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive...... 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive...... 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive...... 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter ................... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its ~- -5- Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated November , 1994. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: By Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Virginia -6- ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto ~~_ (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) w:\vsa\roank\roank24.rs4 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Worksession; Presentation on Proposed Design of the Roanoke County Strategic Vision Process COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The staff requests that the Board of Supervisors schedule a worksession for October 25, 1994 at which time the staff will present to the Board an overview of the proposed objectives and organization of the County's strategic visioning process. Working in conjunction with the Commission, a workprogram for this process has been identified. The staff presentation on the 25th will include a focus on the following areas: I. Goals and Objectives for the Process II. Proposed Process Design including Time Frames for each step. III. Major Work Group Areas Identified STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board schedule the requested worksession for October 25, 1994. 1= -1 2 Respectfully Submitted, r,~ Terrance L. Harri ~on, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, ~~ L ' ~~ ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 3.5009 ACRES OF LAND FROM SALEM STONE CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~v~~~y~~/ ,~ `` ~~~. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of 3.5009 acres of land in connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill site, and several unnamed drainages flowing therefrom to the Roanoke River. BACKGROUND' In August of 1992, Roanoke County executed an "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action" with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to perform a removal response action at the Dixie Caverns landfill site. This removal response action includes work to remove stream sediments containing heavy metal contaminants: lead, cadmium and zinc, which may have been released from the site. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to comply with EPA regulations and standards, and perform the required removal response action, it is necessary to acquire property owned by Salem Stone Corporation. This property will be used to stabilize, treat, and dispose of the contaminated sediment and soil. Staff has negotiated with the property owner for purchase of 3.5009 acres of land, adjoining the landfill property, for the sum of $3,000.00, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. The real estate to be acquired is more particularly described as follows: That certain parcel of land, containing 3.5009 acres, more or less, as shown on 'Plat Showing Property-Being Conveyed to Roanoke County By Salem Stone Corporation' ~{-1 dated August 17, 1994, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. This being a portion of the same real estate conveyed to Salem Stone Corporation, a Virginia corporation, by deeds dated October 11, 1984, and August 21, 1989, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1213, page 2, and Deed Book 1312, page 442, respectively, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.00-1-13. FISCAL IMPACTS• The purchase price of $3, 000.00 for the property would be paid from the available funds in the Dixie Caverns Account. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative Number 1: Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the acquisition of 3.5009 acres of land from Salem Stone Corporation in connection with the Dixie Caverns Landfill Site. Alternative Number 2: Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative Number 1. Respectfully submitted, Vickie L..Huf n Assistant County Attorney Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ~'~ DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL ~ ~9 859, , Tax Map No. 63.00-1-14 PaoPERn ~. ~ A. P. Co. R.C.B.S. ' ,o~` n f~ / N~ ~a 2 6~y h 4 ~ ~ 4 ~ a ~~oi 1~° . Tax Map No. ry 3 63.00-1-13 a 2 ,off SALEM STONE ;~° PROPERTY ry~ H 64, ~ 0~ , ~ Bounded Area Contains 3.5009 Acres. TAX MAP N0._ 63.00-1-13 _____ SCALE:_?„-200' PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY SALEM STONE CORPORATION PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE:_08-17 _94 G: \CAD\PLATS\DIXIECA ~' ~"` f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 3.5009 ACRES OF LAND FROM SALEM STONE CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE WHEREAS, in connection with the cleanup of the Dixie Caverns Landfill and in order to comply with EPA regulations and standards within a specific time frame as set out in the "Administrative Order By Consent For Removal Action," it is necessary to acquire 3.5009 acres of land owned by Salem Stone Corporation, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.00-1-13; and, WHEREAS, the property is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Plat Showing Property Being Conveyed To Roanoke County By Salem Stone Corporation", dated August 17, 1994, prepared by Roanoke County Engineering Department; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said property from Salem Stone Corporation for the sum of $3,000.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994; and the second reading was held on October 25, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire 3.5009 acres from Salem Stone Corporation for the sum of $3,000.00. ~~ 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the funds available for the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXCHANGE OF REAL ESTATE BETNEEN SHIMCHOCR~S LITHO BERVICE, INC. AND TH8 COUNTY OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~ ~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the exchange of real estate between the County of Roanoke and Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. BACKGROUND' By deed, dated October 27, 1987, of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1274, at page 688, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, conveyed to Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. a 7.168-acre parcel of real estate (Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27.3) as shown on a plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, dated October 5, 1987, "Showing division of original Tract "B" containing 16.307 ac. and creating New Tract B-1 (7.168 Ac.) and New Tract B-2 (8.881 Ac.) and a 0.123 Ac. parcel being retained by the County of Roanoke for street purposes." New Tract B-2 (8.881- acre) being retained by Roanoke County is identified as Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. and the County Department of Economic Development are currently working to relocate a company interested in building on this site. As part of the development plan for their property, Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. has proposed an exchange of property with the County of Roanoke. An area containing 0.859-acre owned by the County and bounded by corners 1A, 1B, 1C, 10A, and lA is to be added to and become a part of property owned by Shimchock (New Tract "B-lA"). An area containing 0.866-acre owned by Shimchock and bounded by corners 8, 8A, 8B, 8C, 7A and 8 is to be added to and become a part of property owned by Roanoke County (New Tract "B-2A"). A copy of a portion of the plat showing the proposed exchange of property is attached. This exchange allows the relocating company to have a ~-a better site on which to build. In addition, the buildable area is adjacent to an existing industry as opposed to existing residential structures. The resubdivision plans have been reviewed and approved by the Roanoke County Engineering Department. ALTERNATIVES• (1) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed of exchange of the above-described real estate. (2) Decline to authorize the exchange of the real estate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed Ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1 above. ~e~pec ubmitted, ,.G~ ~ Brian T. Duncan Assistant Director Economic Development Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs reales[shim.rp[ ALL- .,_"~ouyd - .,,,4 ! ~l BL ,~ Xb~ _ m cA , 9l~g U j V ~ ~ O ~ 0 N b 6~ ~ ~ ~ o r ~ V ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Z J O J ~ Il ~ ~ N b Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + > 0 ~ V C ~ ~ ~ e ~ ors y. 2 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ e iL/Oy r Q 2 ~ ~ ti ~o~v~ ~ ~ m~e~ ~rz~ 11- p ~ N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ a ~ r a 2 Q i w J Q ~ ~ o ~ ~ w '~ OQ~4. m s2 ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w. ~ J ~ O ~ O K Q J ~Q~~~ ad s N M 0 L\ ` I ,.. ,~. 0 0 m a' ;` m ~ ~. .QD QD! ~ „oo,s~ ~ • zN ~ O N a ~ 1 ti ~ Q ~ ~ ~ e o`~ e~m > om ~~~~~ _ -•.~~~v ab~a ~ '~3S '~-A1 m ~ '~ SNI~~~~ H p ~ ~ 2 ~t ~ O Q ~ IQ ~ 1 V. O ~ I ~ b I I 1 ~ I m I I ~ ~ I I I 1 _... i~ I 1 I ~~ ~ +: ::.1' ti 1 ` 1 1 I~ v ~ ...° 1. Q tr 11? ~ 41M M p 3 ~ ~ 1 ~' ~ ~ ~Ib Z N I 1 ~ ~ ~ _ '" I ~ H I :.: ~,~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ .. i A K~ NOO d . : OQ. I ~~ 1 M. p z 1 ti 1 ~ 1 R e , 1 ~ ,45:9/ .L5:9Ly~~5 1 ~05,9/slL N ,00.09 ~ o 99 - ~! do,~ \ w^ w ~ ~ ~' O m m v : ~' .... ~ 1 b w` 2 . .... ~~ . Q N ~.. V w ~ fir' ~ h Q ~; N 3 1 J :' Q ;'i; ~ ~ .p O Q O ~ m Z ~ J ~ N ~ V 'V' D ~ ~ ~. Q ti ~ 0 1. r.: j ~ 3 w ~~ ~ _ C~ `° Z ti o ~ ?' ~ .. ~ mt~ON (n N 1N~w~sb~ boy0~'y~ng,5i x ai '15ix~ laawgyb~/y '4d 9 .~d~ ,86E .u~~iin oi~6n Q L~ .Y... ~0, 00, ~ ~L d, 5 YSi,Y~ ~ N - - 1 r` ~~ ~"` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING E%CHANGE OF REAL ESTATE BETWEEN SHIMCHOCR~B LITHO SERVICE, INC. AND THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a tract of land situate in the County of Roanoke containing 8.881 acres (Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27); and, WHEREAS, Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. is the owner of an adjacent tract of land situate in the County of Roanoke containing 7.168 acres (Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27.3); and, WHEREAS, the Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. has proposed an exchange of property with the County of Roanoke in order to improve site location for a proposed building; and WHEREAS, the proposed exchange of property does not conflict with the present or proposed County use of its property identified as Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the exchange of said real estate was held on October 11, 1994; and a second reading was held on October 25, 1994. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, this exchange of real estate does not conflict with other public uses and will ultimately serve a public purpose; said real estate is hereby declared to be surplus for economic development purposes; and, µ-a 2. That the conveyance by the County to Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. of a 0.859-acre parcel of real estate in exchange for the conveyance by Shimchock to the County of a 0.866-acre parcel of real estate as shown upon a plat entitled "Plat showing the resubdivision of Tracts "B-1" and "B-2" (PB 10, PG. 109) creating hereon NEW TRACT "B-1A" (7.168 AC.) PROPERTY OF SHIMCHOCK'S LITHO SERVICE, INC. and NEW TRACT "B-2A" (8.874 AC.) PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA," prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 3 August 1994, of record in Plat Book 17 at page 5, is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the exchange, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. realestshimchoc ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE EXTENDING ALONG SPRING GROVE DRIVE ACROSS STONEBRIDGE PARK OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: u EXECUTIVE SUNIIKARY This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of an easement to Appalachian Power Company (APCO) for extension of an underground line along each side of Spring Grove Drive through portions of the Stonebridge Park property (Tax Map No. 61.02-1-57 and 61.01-1-3). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company has requested an underground easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, along each side of Spring Grove Drive, through Stonebridge Park property as shown on the attached copy of APCO Drawing No. R-3059, dated July 19, 1994. The easement is required in order to extend service to the Hills of Spring Grove Subdivision. Roanoke County staff has checked the proposed easement and determined that it does not interfere with the County's use of the property. FISCAL IMPACTS• Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. ALTERNATIVES• }}-3 (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for donation of the underground easement as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3059, dated July 19, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation of the easement and request from APCO the fair market value as consideration for the purchase of the easement. (3) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, ~.. Vicki L. Hu ma Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs ~~ Q~ ~2~v~, Q~ \~ P ~ ~~ _ ----~ 'SPRING `, GROVE" ~`, SEC.6 ~ BLK.I L1JT 21 ' is-- /~_ i ~ ~' SEG. 6 BLK.4 LOT 4 ~ / COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA T.D. 665000 VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~I MAP SEC 3780- 256A - DIET2GEN 139•M3 GTD 4939F/300/12-86 APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY ROANOKE VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION TBD. DEPARTMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY DRAWN BY L.M. A. HATE JULY 19, 1994 APP. BY J.B.A.III SCALE I ~~> 200' SHEET OF SHEETS DRAWING N0. R - 3059 ~i w~ ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ERTENDING ALONG SPRING GROVE DRIVE ACROSS STONEBRIDGE PARR OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested an easement for extension of underground lines across property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Spring Grove Drive and known as Stonebridge Park in the Vinton District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, APCO requires the easement in order to extend electric service to the subdivision of Hills of Spring Grove; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easement will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994; and a second reading was held on October 25, 1994. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service. I~ ~ ~, 3. That donation of an easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, for an underground line(s) along each side of Spring Grove Drive across and through the property known as Stonebridge Park, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3059, dated July 19, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER "" ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-16. INCORPORATION OF STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND SECTION 9-21. AMENDMENTS OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, AND SECTION 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III. PARKING OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE LATEST EDITION OF THIS CODE AND TO INCREASE CERTAIN PERMIT FEES AND FINES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ n ~C.t.'~'l ~yyti.t-s o ,,. BACKGROUND: In 1991, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as Article II of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code. This had the effect of incorporating by reference the 8th Edition of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community Development. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The State Board Housing and Community Development has recently adopted the latest, 1993, edition of the fire prevention code as the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code with an effective date of April 1, 1994. This ordinance action by this Board is necessary to bring the county into conformity with the latest edition of this code. One objective of this ordinance is to prevent the Board of Supervisors having to readopt this code every time it is updated and amended by the State Board. The new edition of this code has necessitated certain changes in the section numbers previously added as amendments to the county's fire prevention code. In addition certain permit fees are added, as permitted by the statewide code, to cover the administrative cost of enforcement and appeals. An increase in the penalty for parking in fire lanes is also proposed to bring the county into agreement with the fine imposed by the City of Roanoke for such parking violations. ~ h~ FISCAL IMPACT• No additional fiscal impact is anticipated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend adoption of this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, G(J, ~~ Donald W. Gillispie Fire Marshal, County of Roanoke ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens N-'t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-16. INCORPORATION OF STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND SECTION 9-21. AMENDMENTS OF ARTICLE II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, AND SECTION 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III. PARKING OF CHAPTER 12, MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE IN ORDER TO ADOPT THE LATEST EDITION OF THIS CODE AND TO INCREASE CERTAIN PERMIT FEES AND FINES WHEREAS, Article II. VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE of Chapter 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, of the Roanoke County Code was adopted in 1991 in order to incorporate by reference the 8th Edition of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community Development; and WHEREAS, the State Board of Housing and Community Development has adopted the latest, 1993, edition of this Code, effective April 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, it is the current intention of the Roanoke County Department of Fire and Rescue to implement the latest edition of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code as it shall be adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community Development; and WHEREAS, the Department of Fire and Rescue has requested an increase in certain fees permitted under this Code to more adequately reflect the administrative and personnel costs associated with such permits; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994; and the second reading and public hearing took place on October 25, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 9-16. Incorporation of statewide fire prevention code, of Article II. Virainia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, of Chapter 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 9-16. Incorporation of statewide fire prevention code. Pursuant to the provisions of section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Roanoke County shall enforce the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as written with amendments. '~ ``#s' X33 Statewide Fire Prevention Code, °"' ~'~' ~ ~- ~ ~-, was adopted by the State Board of Housing and Community Development w=tn--~-e€€ee~e die-e#~p~~~~; and said board promulgated certain regulations and procedures to accomplish the adoption and enforcement of this code. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is incorporated herein by reference as fully as if set out at length herein. The regulations set forth herein shall be known as the Fire Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke and shall be referred to as such or as this code. Sec. 9-21. Amendments. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to section 27-97 of the Code of Virginia~t 2 (3 ) F-~~1~-~ ~~~~`<'<'~y~` Impersonation Add subsection F-'~i ~... i.. 1~ IIi I,I.:: I~I~~: T~,M.:::l ... '-"''.' .' .' .' as follows: "It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized person to use a badge, uniform or any other credentials so as to gain access to any building, marine vessel, vehicle, or premises, or to otherwise falsely identify himself as the fire official or his designated representative." (8 ) F-~8-~-9 ~'~?"~°'~<'~'~+~n~. Add to section F-~~-6 ~3' „s the following words, terms and meanings: "Fire Lanes: An area designated by clearly visible signs in which parking shall be prohibited, whether on public or private property, to ensure ready access for and to fire fighting and rescue equipment and facilities." 3 ~~ (9) F-3~A3-r9 ~~; Torches for the removal of paint Add the following words to the title: " or sweating bipe joints. " ................... (10 ) F-393-T3. ~:;~~ Sweating i oints Add the following subsection "Any person using a torch or other flame producing device for sweating pipe joints in any building or structure shall have available in the immediate vicinity where the sweating is done one (1) approved fire extinguisher or water hose connected to a water supply. Combustible material in close proximity to the work shall be protected against ignition by shielding, wetting or other approved means. In all cases, a fire watch shall remain in the vicinity of the sweating operation for one-half (1/2) hour after the torch or flame producing device has been used." (11) F-383' ~~.3.1 Permit required Add subsection F-3-~3 r.3.1 as follows: "A permit shall be obtained from the fire official prior to using a torch or other flame producing device for sweating pipe joints in any building or structure." (12) F-33-~~~.1, Designation. Delete and substitute as follows: "The fire official shall designate fire lanes on public streets and on private property where necessary for the purpose of preventing parking in front of or adjacent to fire 4 F- hydrants and fire department connections and to ensure access to buildings and structures for fire fighting and rescue apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum width of eighteen (18) feet (5486 mm)." (13 ) F-313:<~~. 4 , Signs and markings Add section F-313:. 4 as follows "The property owner or designee shall supply and install signs and other required markings to delineate fire lanes as directed by the fire official." (14) F-313;x:.5, Specifications. Add section F-313s~.5 as follows: "Fire lanes shall conform to the following specifications: (A) The design of such signs shall conform to the state manual on uniform traffic-control devices and shall include the language "No Parking--Fire Lane." (B) Signs designating fire lanes shall be located so as to provide at least one sign at the beginning, one sign at the end, and one sign for every one hundred (100) feet segment of fire lane space. Should the fire marshal determine that additional signs are necessary, the owner or agent of the property shall provide the same. All such signs shall be maintained in proper position and sufficiently legible to be seen by an ordinarily observant person. 5 ++-, (C) Fire lane signs shall be placed as follows: (1) Pave edge to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 6' nor more than 10'. Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (2) Curb face to sign edge: Rural: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. Urban: Not less than 1' nor more than 3'. (3) Pavement top to sign bottom: Rural: 5'. Urban: 7'. (4) Curb top to sign bottom: Rural: 5'. Urban: 7'. (D) Posts for fire lane signs, where required, shall be metal and securely mounted. (E) The curb of all fire lanes shall be painted yellow. In the absence of a curb, the pavement edge shall be painted yellow. Any existing marking in the area designated as a fire lane shall be obliterated or painted over in a manner approved by the fire marshal." 6 ,~. ~. (1) Where hydrants are located at or close to the curb line or edge of the road and face on a public street, a public parking lot or a private road open to the public, parking within fifteen (15) feet is prohibited. (2) A special curb marking designated areas established pursuant to (1) above, shall be required and shall be yellow. (3) No planting, erection or other obstruction shall be allowed within four (4) feet of the fire hydrant. (4) All hydrants shall be painted in accordance with standards established by the fire marshal." .::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.::::::::.::::::.:..:.............:.................::..::..::::....... ~.~:...6...:~: ~::::;;~t~: (1~>) F-31$ .1, Cooking devices on or under balconies ~'~~'~~~~71 ~:+: "No charcoal cooker, brazier, hibachi or grill, or any gasoline or other flammable liquid of liquified petroleum gas- fired stove::>»»>` ` ~ >>:::<:;>::, ,. .,, ;>::: ;,,,.;;;;;;;;,,,,.,,;.~:~;,;;..~~,~. or similar device shall be ignited or used on or under the balconies of any apartment buildingI`?'~ji`j~: or similar occu anc which a ............................................... p y re constructed of combustible materials. The management of such occupancies shall notify its tenants in writing of this code 7 4 I ' requirement at the time the tenant initially occupies the apartment and from time to time as necessary to ensure compliance." 2. That Section 12-51. Penalties for Parking Violations of Article III. Parkinct of Chapter 12 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC of the Roanoke County Code be amended and re-enacted, as follows: Sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a traffic infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined according to the following schedule: Parking in fire lanes, in front of fire hydrants or fire or rescue building ~ ~~ ~~ 8 rF y . . 3. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after November 1, 1994. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER `~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 2308 WHICH GRANTS TO BOOTH AMERICAN COMPANY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV, THE RIGHT TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION (CATV) SYSTEM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The original franchise agreement between the County of Roanoke and Booth American Company, doing business as Salem Cable TV, was entered into in 1979 for a term of 15 years. Salem Cable TV serves about one-third of the number of customers in the county as it does within the City of Salem. The City of Salem entered into its current franchise agreement with Salem Cable TV in 1984 for a term of 15 years; their franchise agreement expires on October 4, 1999. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The negotiating team appointed by the Board of Supervisors has reached agreement with representatives of Booth American Company to extend their franchise for a cable television system in the Catawba and a small portion of the Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts for a term of five years. This will bring the county's franchise with Booth American into the same time sequence as their franchise with the City of Salem. The major changes in the terms of Booth American Company's franchise operations are as follows: 1. The franchise fee will be increased to 5~ of the operator's gross subscriber revenues. This will go into effect on the next billing cycle after the adoption of this amended ordinance. The current franchise fee is 3~. 2. Salem Cable will proceed to interconnect with the Cox Cable Roanoke system by January 1, 1997, if technically feasible. By December 1, 1994, Salem Cable will provide the county with an educational and governmental access channel located on Channel 3 on their system. Therefore, once the interconnect is active, RVTV Channel 3 will be available to all county citizens subscribing to a cable television service. 3. The density requirement for extension of service by Salem Cable was reduced to 25 housing units per mile for aerial service from 35 customers per mile and to 40 housing units per mile for underground service. Service must be provided for any aerial drop of up to 150 feet with actual installation charges only assessed beyond that distance. 4. Booth American Company has agreed to pay a capital grant of $40, 000 to the county for equipment to be acquired for use in providing educational and governmental access. This grant will be paid over a period of three years beginning on January 1, 1995. This amount will be reflected in Salem Cable's bills to its customers beginning at the time of the first payment. 5. Salem Cable TV currently provides free basic cable service to every county governmental building, fire station, library or school building within its franchise area. The ordinance reflects this continuing commitment. A franchise agreement will be executed between the county and Booth American Company which will reflect the provisions of this ordinance and other technical matters to insure that Salem Cable's operations substantially match those provided to customers of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. in the county. FISCAL IMPACT• The increase in the franchise fee to 5$ should result in an increase in revenues to the county of approximately $16,000 per year. Based upon approximately 3,500 subscribers to Salem Cable TV in the county, each 1$ of franchise fee results in approximately $8,000 per year in revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of this ordinance. 2 ~ r~°° Respectfully submitted, ~'m Jo ph benshain S or A sistant County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs 3 I.:.:: ~t `~ $..yv' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 2308 WHICH GRANTS TO BOOTH AMERICAN COMPANY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV, THE RIGHT, FOR THE TERM AND UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS HEREIN STATED TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION (CATV) SYSTEM AND TO USE THE STREETS, ALLEYS AND PUBLIC WAYS IN CERTAIN SPECIFIC AREAS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ESTABLISH CONDITIONS CONTROLLING THE EXERCISE OF SAID FRANCHISE AND THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF CATV SERVICES. WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2308, adopted May 22, 1979, the County of Roanoke granted unto Booth American Company of Detroit, Michigan, doing business as Salem Cable TV, a franchise for a term of fifteen (15) years from the date that necessary authorization was obtained from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to operate a community antenna/cable television (CATV) system; and WHEREAS, in contemplation of the expiration of this franchise term in 1994, negotiations have been ongoing between members of the Board of Supervisors and county staff and representative of Booth American Company which have resulted in an agreement for appropriate amendments to said Ordinance No. 2308 in accordance with the mutual agreement to extend the term of this franchise for an additional five (5) years; and WHEREAS, Booth American Company d/b/a Salem Cable TV is prohibited by federal law from operating a community antenna or cable television system within the territorial limits of Roanoke County without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law and by Ordinance 62894-5, the Board of Supervisors 1~ extended the current franchise for a period of 120 days from July 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994; and a public hearing and the second reading on October 25, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: (1) That Ordinance No. 2308, adopted effective June 21, 1979, be amended and reenacted as follows: 1. Term. The term of the franchise is extended and renewed for a period commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance and ending on October 4, 1999. 2. Franchise Fee. The Grantee shall pay to the County five percent (5~) of the Grantee's Gross Subscriber Revenues. Grantee may include this amount in its bills to subscribers upon the effective date of this Amendment. 3. Interconnection. If technically feasible, the Grantee shall interconnect its Cable Television System with the cable television system operated in the County by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., no later than January 1, 1997. Immediately following the effective date of this Amended Ordinance, the Grantee shall institute negotiations with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. in order that all costs may be shared among the cable companies for both the construction and operation of the interconnection link. The Grantee may be granted 2 ~ ':.~.~ reasonable extensions of time to interconnect, or the County may rescind this requirement to interconnect, upon petition by the Grantee to the County. The County shall grant such request if it finds that the Grantee has negotiated in good faith and has failed to obtain an approval from Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., of the proposed interconnection, or that the cost of the interconnection would cause an unreasonable or unacceptable increase in subscriber rates. 4. Access Channel. The Grantee shall provide the County one (1) downstream public education and governmental access channel no later than December 1, 1994. This access channel shall be located on Channel 3. 5. Capital Grant. The Grantee shall provide a capital grant to the County for acquisition of equipment to be used by the County, in the amount of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00). The capital grant is to be used by the County for access purposes only and shall not be considered to be part of the franchise fee. The Grantee shall pay the capital grant to the County in three equal installments of Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Three Dollars and 33/100ths ($13,333.33) each with the first being due on January 1, 1995, the second on January 1, 1996, and the third on January 1, 1997. The Grantee may reflect this capital grant in bills to its subscribers commencing with the bill for January, 1995. 3 -5 6. Free Basic Service. The Grantee shall provide basic service without charge to each governmental building, fire station, police station, library or school building within the Franchise Area. One standard drop and one converter (if needed) per building shall constitute compliance. In the event new schools or governmental buildings are constructed in the Franchise Area, the County shall notify the Grantee at the time the construction contract is awarded so that cable service can be installed at the time the new building opens for use, provided, however, Grantee need not provide service in the event the building is in an area which Grantee would not be required to serve pursuant to the line extension policy set forth below. 7. Line Extension Policv. Grantee shall offer cable service to all occupants of any area of the Franchise Area with a density of 25 Housing Units or more per mile served by aerial plant within six months of such request by the County. Grantee shall offer cable service to all occupants of any area within the Franchise Area with a density of 40 Housing Units or more per mile served by underground plant within 12 months of such request by the County. Computations of density shall take into account any connecting lines required to serve such areas, if not contiguous to the existing Cable System, as well as any 4 ~^"° Housing Units passed by such connecting lines. 8. Aerial Drops Exceeding 150 Feet. With respect to requests for connection requiring an aerial drop in line in excess of one hundred fifty (150) feet, the Grantee must extend and make available cable television service to such residents at a connection charge not to exceed the actual installation costs incurred by the Grantee for the distance exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet. 9. Franchise Area. "Franchise Area" shall mean the following: a. All of the Catawba Magisterial District except for the area south of I-81 and east of Route 419. b. That portion of the Windsor Hills Magisterial District which includes the west side of Keagy Road to Walton Lane and from Walton Lane southwest to the Catawba Magisterial District including Fairway Forest Subdivision. 10. Reservation of Rights. Both the County and the Grantee expressly reserve any and all rights which each has under federal or state law including, but not limited to, the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. 11. Enforcement. No later than the effective date of this Franchise the Grantee shall obtain and provide a 5 }~s surety bond in a form acceptable to the Grantor, or shall deposit and maintain a letter of credit, in the sum of $25,000 and to be maintained throughout the term of this Franchise. This bond, or letter of credit, shall be used to ensure the faithful performance by the Grantee of all provisions of this Ordinance and the Franchise Agreement including the payment by Grantee of any penalties, costs, claims, liens or taxes due by reason of the construction, maintenance, or operation of the Cable Television System, or any breach of any provision under this Ordinance. 12. Effect of Amendment. To the extent the provisions of this Amendment conflict with any provision in Ordinance No. 2308, the provisions of this Amendment shall control, and the inconsistent provisions of Ordinance No. 2308 are hereby repealed. In all other respects the provisions of Ordinance No. 2308 are hereby ratified and confirmed. (2) The County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with Booth American Company, d/b/a/ Salem Cable TV, to carry into effect these provisions all upon such form as shall be approved by the County Attorney. (3) This ordinance shall be in effect from and after its enactment. 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE 101194-5 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM RODERIC L. MOORE AND DONNA P. GRAYSON FOR THE PINRARD COURT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, in connection with the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project, it is necessary to acquire a permanent drainage easement upon, over, under and across property currently owned by Leroy J. Anderson and to be purchased by Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-1-38; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement, varying in width from 15.01 feet to 15.08 feet, and consisting of a total area of 0.032 Ac., is shown and designated upon a plat dated October 21, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the sum of $900.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and the second reading was held on October 11, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson a permanent drainage easement, as shown on the plat dated October 21, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, for an amount not to exceed $900.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid from the available funds in the account for Repairs to Rural Addition Roads. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: YY1cx~, .~/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections METES AND B 0 UNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ~'- ~ P~NVE ~ oOr N66 ~9 TAX MAP No.87.08-1-39 LOT 3 ~~• O ~~~~ N60 _,, TAX MAP N0. 87.08-1-38 SCALE: 1 °=20' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY LEROY J. ANDERSON PREPARED BY.' RDANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ~ 0-21-92 REIAEW: 09-08-94 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM RODERIC L. MOORE AND DONNA P. GRAYSON FOR THE PINKARD COURT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /J ~(/ ~~`~_ EXECUTIVE SUNIIKARY This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of a permanent drainage easement (0.032 Ac.) from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project. BACKGROUND• In approximately 1984, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors added the Pinkard Court Project to the Rural Addition Priority List. In order for the Virginia Department of Transportation to approve Pinkard Avenue and Valley Avenue for acceptance into the state secondary system, it is necessary to make certain road and drainage improvements within the Pinkard Court Subdivision. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Leroy J. Anderson is the current owner of Lots 1 and 2, Section 2, Pinkard Court, abutting Valley Avenue and Meadow View Road, and designated upon the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-1-38. In connection with the drainage improvements for Pinkard Avenue, acquisition of a drainage easement across this property is required. The proposed drainage easement, varying in width from 15.01 feet to 15.08 feet, and consisting of a total area of 0.032 Ac., is shown on a plat dated October 21, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto. Based upon an appraisal of the proposed acquisition prepared by Earl G. Robertson, MAI, SRA, the estimated fair market value of the easement is $398.00. W' In attempting to negotiate the purchase of the above-described easement, staff determined that the property is to be sold in the near future to Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson. Staff has negotiated with Mr. Moore and Ms. Grayson, and upon acquiring the property, they have agreed to sell the easement to the County for the sum of $900.00. Upon consideration of the anticipated purchase price to be paid for the property by Mr. Moore and Ms. Grayson, which would not have been taken into consideration on the appraisal, this amount is not unreasonable for acquisition of the easement. FISCAL IMPACTS• There is currently $1,700 in the account for Repairs to Rural Addition Roads and the purchase price for this easement would be paid from the available funds in this account. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative #1: Authorize acquisition of the proposed drainage easement from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project for the sum of $900.00. Alternative #2: Delete Pinkard Court roads from the Rural Addition List, due to costs and concerns involved with the necessary acquisitions. Alternative #3: Decline to accept Roderic L. Moore's and Donna P. Grayson's offer to sell for $900.00, and direct staff to initiate eminent domain proceedings against the current or subsequent property owner(s). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huff n Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHDA'N ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. ~" P~NVE ~ P~`'E~( 00~~ N66 ~9 Y' TAX MAP No.87.08-1-39 LOT 3 TAX MAP N0. 87.08-1-38 PROPOSED '~ DR INAGE EASEMENT (0.032 Ac.) ~~. O~ REMAINING PROPERTY OF LEROY J. ANDERSON P.B. 1 PG. 363 ~~ >>_ LOT 2 SCALE: 1 "=20' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY LEROY J. ANDERSON ~F-~ 0 ~ ~ F~ ~~ ~O LOT 1 9 Z~` 9 O~ '0 O~ N6~ ~~ ~ °~ P~ PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ~ 0- 21- 92 REVIEW: 09-08-94 1- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM RODERIC L. MOORE AND DONNA P. GRAYSON FOR THE PINKARD COURT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, in connection with the Pinkard Court Road and Drainage Improvement Project, it is necessary to acquire a permanent drainage easement upon, over, under and across property currently owned by Leroy J. Anderson and to be purchased by Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-1-38; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement, varying in-width from 15.01 feet to 15.08 feet, and consisting of a total area of 0.032 Ac., is shown and designated upon a plat dated October 21, 1992, made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson for the sum of $900.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and the second reading was held on October 11, 1994. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Roderic L. Moore and Donna P. Grayson a permanent drainage easement, as shown on the plat dated October 21, 1992, „~ ~ made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, for an amount not to exceed $900.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid from the available funds in the account for Repairs to Rural Addition Roads. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVI8OR8 OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE 101194-6 AUTHORIZING QIIIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF FO% RIDGE ROAD AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 22 OF HUNTING HILLS, SECTION 23 WHEREAS, in order for Fox Ridge Road (State Route 1420) to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested quit-claim and release of an existing sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Fox Ridge Road accepted into the state secondary road system and the release, subject to the issuance of a permit and other conditions, will not interfere with other public services. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and a second reading was held on October 11, 1994; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by r conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Fox Ridge Road into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release of the sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for the sanitary sewer lines or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of- way, between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Fox Ridge Road is used as part of the public street or highway system. 4 . That the subject easement is not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H.~Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 101194-6 authorizing quit-claim and release of sanitary sewer easement, Fox Ridge Road, Hunting Hills, Section 23, adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ' ~ EXHIBIT A LEGE11~ :~ ~ . ~ ~ N ~,, M.B.L. DENOTES MINIMUM EiJI ~ ~'~* LINE Z ~ 2 ~ D.E. DENOTES DRAINAGE EA o = ~ S.S.E. DENOTES SANITARY SE ~ -~ 6 a< ,,¢~ Q ~ ~ EASEMENT ~ X1,9 Q } P . U . E . DENOTES PUBLIC UTIL ~? ~~~~/~~ ~ ~ ~ EAS iMENT h X61 ~s S6 9GF bpd O ~ ~\~ZO. O' OSD ~°~ C~-~,~ arc 9 31 s °T ~~h"~~~ E~~~~, ~s~" STATE OF VIRGINIA ~~1 'V' / ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY/CO NTY OF RC 'rQ ' ~S r`°'+4 ~ ~ ~ b' ~ ~ ~~ FOR E AFORESAIC sr6. 3 ~ ' "ri 9. ~ ~` ~4~ ~ O O b THAT GC~RDON C. W' o; '9 y ~~~ ~ ~ ~ DENT & SECRETARY , S ~ ~ °4 ATION WHOSE NAME ~~~ ~~~ ING JATEU ^-~~.. 5 8~~01 ~~,~~~ ~ ~ APPEARED BEFORE t J Z~~ 52~ ~~ , Tj AND ACKNOWLEDGED ~~ /~~: „n~~ ~9 .~,ah 8 ,~ ~" MY COMMISS IC ~ ~a ~ ~ .\ ~ ) ~ ~ ,. ~ , Q ~ ~~~ ~~ ,N v~ I ~s ~ ti ~ i' s • 9 6' 6' °- 3 ~~B J' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I P` ~ ` ,~ I ~~ I :2~8 1~1 v .- I \ > ~ °3 ~ ~ ti' 6~° h~ ~ y ~ \t~ Nom, -_~ ~ f0 . ~ ~ ~~\ ~oQ ~ ~ ZZ ~3GOGX 3, 4EGtJON * ZO ~ ~~, S/C`~, -HUNrinrU yicc5 '" P ~, `I ~ PG. 317 ~` ~ ~ 'moo ..: , CION Q~ -~~O / ffc ~P' 2. IRON PINS HRVE ~ q ~TION BEEN SET PTCALS /) QED AND CORNERS. ~ ~ ?LAT. P.T. S• EXHIBIT B 'r87.~0-3-G ''87.Z0- 3-7 '"r7.Z0-3-±- Q 7 ~ ~~' P~tot~, t, S~cr~oN Yf L OGK 3, g Ec7;s7N ao 3 NtlNTlN6 N/L L 5 kUNTl~l6 HILLS P.13.10 PEi.146 P ~. 9 PG. 3!7 ~ !°q sia ~Q- OGo NEB Z"r;. ~ 2' 'ff~~ D.PJ. 756 ~ y b~ 6~,2 2 ~Q33i' ~~ '" i ~6~~° 64s" 4 5 0~°~ ~ ~ ' 3 "^ gj /~" ~ B.o6 /Y-_~/ / ° 8'55 "~ ~ 5' #87.20-Z-ZO cv J v~•' /~ h. 08 4 _.- o ~~- /46. s ZJS. 0~ f H 3b,86'l'~ ~: ~ ~ z Z/~T. ae~7 ~>'~a.oo' ~~ i~ ~4'1~ A.L. l5'P.u.E o. 3b~84 ~ h~. , ~ ay~~ ~I~~fr~ ~ D r ~ -N. 00'SBOrc. 4. N~~ ~`'~~° / hb 38, 5z 3 ~ ~ ~ 35, Sob ~ N m 34, ~ t~ ~ ~ o ~ t ~ 4~ ~ ~ T' tv .-75.65' ro 5.OG X8'07' W ~ ~ ~~ Pl.51GUEA FOX ~.! ~ \ 3 G~ 4 i ~~ ~ `r FsOAD .OQ 50.65_ C-=; o~j~ + T30~h1.g.G. Z~ n -- -- ~ ~ 1-~ °87.20-2-1 ti ~ \~~~2 ~6~ Ih~ F.E. -Z~---- r.~0-40.55 •h0~^ ~`' /S~UF or `•,, ~~ 4.13' ~-8 (~~t~ A1.OZ'Z/p0 ' ~W 1N FOX ~ °' ~ ~`3°. ~ ~' 1~'QO GO yo•4 ~,lg h.02 20.00' ~Q ;. ~ ~- ~ /eb- ~,,. .-1l OG+E." _.Z~ --- ~}~~~- 40.55 ~ N 3d,874b ~ M Z3,472,~y /`Z~o°~~t`~ h,__(Z~1.7~~~J ~ ,~~•, ?15'P.u. r}GG'Gl4 Z pg.lo Fs.l.t~ c., _ 0`~. ~ P~ ~~h 1; 1 Q o I 5ccrroN ~ 2 1 ~ - ~ - ti , a ?~~ ~,~. ~ o o -/UNTlNG N!L L S ~ `~` ~ h~ 0~'p~~ I N ~ 4' ° °- 'r ~' ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ :,,: ;:~ ! l • V'~pk~oZ9,:7,!'' _ I ~ ` ~ Z9, Z?4 d .~ ~ ~ 33,848 ~ o `x'20' 5 gig. ~, ~i h N ~:~ ~ r 9 " mar- 6' ~ ~, Q ~~ r a ~ h ~E ZZ S~i6~jjE' Z3e..48' ~ ~ ~ Z/3.1Z'4(za~ ~s_ ~'SO~`- L' \87-ZO-Z-Z fd E' hq~i S.GZ°PT'GO"5.-- i u. i f,I.OZ°0('00"w `woe `'~~5.00'~ I o '87.20-Z-3\ ~ ~ I N # F ` 1 Q -- lY 02 W o z,~ l7 h ~~ ,~~ q4 Ml 44, 639 '~ .~ Q ? :~ 3Z !43 a ~ ~ ,~ o ~ ~tio ~~~ 9 ---- 5 415.37 ^ I o ~ ~ I 234 5B' G ` ~ / yqr ~~: ta' '' Zd ~. n ~ h OZ°Ot'00"E.-~ ~ ~ ~ I NOZ`0!'00"h'l. `~'~~~.~<. `a 'R 0 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ p ~ 04 y 1 ~ 1 ~ Q /p q/yG``~ l~~ m ~ ~ l ' ~ g '~ ° ~ 33,4204 '~` m ~// 4~ r ~ ~ ~. E. + ~ ° I ~ ~ 4.60' ~ ~ ~~ .xlsr~E l 4!944' "' ;~ Z4Z. SS' ~ 5 0 Z C3 ;~__~ °0;'OO"E.-- ~ I ~.~~ I -N.oz'of'oo"F'1. o~ 1~ N o v ~ .~ / ~ I ~ ' `` ~ ~ / rJ ~. ~ f ~ ~ 0 1$ ~, ~ , 59, lZ3 d a ~ t Q 34 440 ~ ;{,' ~ I I ~ `" i ' ti't ~ ,~ i ~ !41.67' I ~Z~ 0 2' I ° ~' ~` ~ I r ~ 247. y4' o ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~, w ~ i~ ~ 1 ~'. I ACTION NO. ITEM NO . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF FOX RIDGE ROAD AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 22 OF HUNTING HILLS, SECTION 23 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~'~ I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize quit-claim and release of the sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions. In May of 1987, Old Heritage Corporation dedicated an off-site sanitary sewer easement to the County of Roanoke for public use. Said easement is shown and designated as "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" upon the 'Plat of Section No. 21, Hunting Hills,' recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 10, Page 146, a partial copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Hunting Hills Country Club, Inc., subsequently subdivided the adjoining property by 'Plat Showing Section No. 23, Hunting Hills', of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 12, Page 8, a partial copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The off- site sanitary sewer easement described above lies within Section 23 and is beneath Fox Ridge Road between Lots 2 and 22. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order for Fox Ridge Road (State Route 1420) to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and ~:d `. clear of any third party rights or encumbrances. The quit-claim and release of the subject portion of the sanitary sewer easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia would be subject to VDOT issuing a permit for such facilities and the condition that the facilities located within the 50-foot right-of-way, between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Fox Ridge Road is used as part of the public street or highway system; however, said easement would not be vacated by the Board and would revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. FISCAL IMPACTS• None ALTERNATIVES• (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for quit-claim and release of the sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions. (2) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, which would result in Fox Ridge Road remaining a private road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #l. Respectfully submitted, ,, Vicki L. Huff Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix -~ EXHIBIT A LEGE~l~ - . ~,_ J ~: `l'am M.B.L. DENOTES MINIMUM PiJIL ~ N ~a LINE ~Z ~ Z ~ D.E. DENOTES DFAINAGE EAE o ~ ~ S . S . E . DENOTES SANITARY SE4~ ~~ fj Z EASEMENT ''~ ' ~ . ~~~~~J,9 Q~ ~ P.U.E. DENOTES PUBLIC UTILI ~ .y~,~/Jj ~ ~ EASEMENT ~ ~!i fir, .o ~ `r ~~c f6,~?s 'pS~ ,sue 9G~ Coo'e o . 9 S Tl si~C.~~ ooh \ ~ \~c~E ~ ~~ ~ "9 ~p~ ~~ ~ ~, s9 `~ ~ ~/Z °lJ 7 ~ti~ ~ ~'~~' , ~~" STATE OF VIRGINIA ~~~ ~~ / ~ ~ ~~ ~ CITY/CO NTY OF R0~ S ~. ~ a4 ~ \ \6 ~ '~S3 `~'~~,R/ ' ~d' ~ ~ ~~ FOR E AFORESAID 9- 6 ~ ~ n4~ ~ ~ O b THAT CORDON C . WII v, '99 ~Z/ ~ ~ ~ DENT & SECRETARY, S ~ ~ ~ ATION WHOSE NAMES ~ ~ o?~ ING DATEll ~~ 0~ 17* r ~/~ ~ yS ~ ~ APPEARED BEFORE E -~~ j ~j, AND ACKNOWLEDGED Z ~ 200. SZ' ~h'i; - „n,~ ~ • ,LD~ry 8 '-~b~' MY COMMISSION ~ 9~a ~ ~ ~ _, . Q ~ ~~~ ~~ ~; I mss, j (V ~ N I I v S • ~I I °~B ~ `~ ` z~ ~I ;~ . ~e I cos°3' ~ ~~ ~,• ~ ~ ~ >/6e~3~'~ j~y~~12tir ~ 9 -- 582.01 %9„E \\ \\ ~ _ Ni~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~1~~ Z3 - _ . \ s !0 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ gLOGlf ~, 4EG~ION * ZO ~ ~~, ~j~`F ZZ "NUNI'!NU HIPS 317 ~`~ - ~ ~ P ~. `1 ~ ~.~- ~ - OG C ION r~ `~ g~ ~P' 2. IRON PINS HAVE CO ~p'9 / f!L ~TION BEEN SET AT ALL f CORNERS. P.C.'S ~ QED AND P.T.'S• PLAT. EXHIBIT B - X87. ZO- 3-S ''87.Z0- 3-7 • "v i.Z0-3-S ~~ 4 6 7 ~ PILOGK. J, SdcrroN 2r 3L OCK 3, 6 Ecr~vN ao 3 NL!Nr/Nd N/L L 5 NUNT1~tl6 NrL L S P.13.10 PG. Id d Rf3.9 PG.3l~ P630 N ~ S/g°/Q.~~., ~ OGn NERI b~ha Z~ E. 1933/ ~,~ ~ U.Ai. ~* 87 t ~. b ab 6p 2 X646- 4 / * 3 ,_ `~ r g3/s~ / ~/BOZO--~ % h h. 08°08'55"~ ~" 55' 87. ZO- ~ ZO ~, °° 3b, 86'l °~ a 46. SZ, ~ y~,a 00' ZJS. 00' H~ n. 4. ~ Z/. ~/' 447 ;~ 3a • 15'P.u.E ~. 36 i'$Q ~ h~' , / r~~ ~~0~~ ~ v ~ \~~ ~-Z -105.65' -4 ~ h~ \~~~e~ ^~~ap°`~ 3 ~ M Q ~ = 39114 t --N. 00' t~~ ~~ 4 ~ ~ 3S 5Z'~ ~ ._ ~ 35, SOd ~ ~ m , .- / 5. F14' I0~ l q o r . ~ l0 ` '~~ ~, T ~ C' N N `'c Pl.S~GVER FOX G-/ ~O{'" 7L 4'7'W-~ `~ ~ /~ OJ ,_ i ROAD . DD 50.65 - G-_ ; '°;q/~ ~ ; 30' ~1.e.G. ~ Z3 1~. 30',"~f~3.~. 5~:~ 6~\ ~y•FU.E. ___~-~8 t.~o-40.55' a ~ t'o. ~' 7 ~,/•aQ GO~W yp'41N FOX L•18 h.02'2a'OO"E. D " ~~ ~ H ~- ~ ~ /oQb- ~ ~~ h AO 00"E.'~ __i0 ___ ~~ 40.55 cq 3x'874 0. o Z3,Q7 ~ Y ~ oo~rt~ hJ_r~Z~' ,~ 3p',r,~c. Z15"P.U.E.- EcrroN ~ z 1$ pg.l0 F4. /d~ ~ _ _~0~• 'b,~ ia~~E,! ~- 1 ~ o ° I g ~ ~ 1 0_0 'UNTlNG N/L L 5 T ~ \ h`i,~ ~'pi•, I t v ~ ~ ~ `•'' ~ ~ o _~:`'-~.,. ' ~ J ~ V:• p1` ~°'L9, ~7./'' ~ ~ Z9, Z Z4 ~ ,~ E 'L 33, 898 ~ o `•T' 33, ZZ ~~6', 3 ~" 23Agg' w ~ "~` Z13.1Z'4c23' ®s_ ~sso~~_ ~e7-zo-a-z ~ qs; ~.cz°a~•co"~.-- - - i ~,~ oz°ar'coM;~ ~,, ``~~~.oo'- ~ . ~h, .c. lt7 i v` ~ ~ 7r ~ ~ ~1'1 ~ ~ n 4,; ~ N p ~ ~ ,~ Y ~ /~ ~ ~ro ~ O ~ p ~ ` ` ti \ r7 ~ ~~~~~Q ~4 Ml 44,dfi9 6 Q 4 ~ 3Z,143~ ~'1`= \ ~~~ ~O?F 6'9 -----_ ~.3 4ry. 37' ^ I o ~ I I Z34 58' ~% ~ t ~s~yf Zd IIn.CO' ~j OZ°Ot'00„E•-~ ° ~ ~ •, 1 "~ ~. R' °~,'•. ~ ,~ ~ I N OZ O 1'00 hl. s,~ ~.~. ~ Z0~3.E1 1 ~- "a ~ ~~ i ,~' ZO'S~i.E. ~ =' Go~O~:~1% ~ ~ n M ~ ' / 5 8, 475 ~ ~ ~ T•°i + .°~ E 3 3, 42 0 d IR ~` m ~i~ ~E°G~ r/4t 4'19 44' "' i ~ I ~ 29Z. SS' 4.60' -•~~ ~ ~~ of 5 OZ°01'00"E. -- IP, , 3 ~~ _ _ ~ I ~ $.~ ! -- N. U 1' 0('00"r1 ~ ~ K ~ ' q' =- / o N o ° / 1$ ~"' ~ o ~~ `~` `~ j j ~ o ( b v `~ N Q ~ 59 /23 '~ Sa ~ ~ 'f ~ ~ t ~ 3a,4~o ~ ~I--~• `~ ~'. ~ I r: i '` w ~ ~ 14L 67' 4Z~ o Z' I ~ I 297.94' ~ ~ o (~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ - PJ. OZ of '00"4'/. i q ~ ! ~..~ °~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING QOIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF FO% RIDGE ROAD AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 22 OF HUNTING HILLS, SECTION 23 WHEREAS, in order for Fox Ridge Road (State Route 1420) to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested quit-claim and release of an existing sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Fox Ridge Road accepted into the state secondary road system and the release, subject to the issuance of a permit and other conditions, will not interfere with other public services. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and a second reading was held on October 11, 1994; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by "~. conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Fox Ridge Road into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release of the sanitary sewer easement within the boundaries of Fox Ridge Road and located between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for the sanitary sewer lines or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of- way, between Lots 2 and 22 of Hunting Hills, Section 23, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Fox Ridge Road is used as part of the public street or highway system. 4 . That the subject easement is not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. ~ i ~ f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE 101194-7 VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CREEK CIRCLE ALONG THE EASTERN BIDE OF MISTY FOREST SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Custom Development Corporation, the current petitioner, and Corpre, Inc., the initial petitioner, have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close an unimproved portion of right-of-way, forty feet (40') in width, known as Creek Circle, located on the east side of the proposed Misty Forest Subdivision in the Windsor Hills District of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the public hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That an unimproved portion of right-of-way known as Creek Circle, as shown on the 'Plat Showing Part of Creek Circle to be Vacated for Custom Development Corporation' dated June 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto, created by an unrecorded plat for Norwood Corporation dated March 12, 1959, shown on the Roanoke County Land Records (Tax Map #95.03), and bounded by property owned by Custom Development Corporation which is designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos. 95.03-2-17, 95.03-2-18, and 95.03-2-19, be, and hereby is, vacated to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, pursuant to Section 15.1- 482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance, together with a copy of the attached plat, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the current Petitioner, Custom Development Corporation, or its successors or assigns; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance 101194-7 vacating and closing an unimproved portion of right-of-way known as Creek Circle, Misty Forest Subdivision, adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~- 0 Z 6g6 752 U - M w~ ~~ X938 Z 221 ~ ~ ~w zo ~p BE NT S I TE F- _ U ,~ MOUN' < TA I N ~ ~ 00 ~~ ~n .~ py D ~ o~. ~ w o ~ ~ ~ ' I~^ ~ LOCATION MAP ly Fp •\ \ /ST ~~ MFR ~ O~ L ~~~ 9 9 F F ~ ,~ RRY \ ~v < / \ '9N~C \ U ~ a O \ RT \ ~ 3 r ~ 9 ~ v ~ ` 8 \ NOTES : \ Ya °W I) SEE PLAT C.R. MCMURRY \ R f ~ .' o ~ ` DlrTED MAY 12 1994 FOR "MISTY u. ~ FOREST" SUBDIVISION PLAT. EDGE OF ' ~ PAVEMENT S ~ti 2) SEE PLAT C.R. MCMURRY DATED APRIL 21 1994 FOR NEW LOT 10 ~ PLAT OF I1i.888 ACRES FOR LARRY FENZEL. 1.650 ~ ACRES 3) AREA TO BE VACATED BOUNDED TOLD LOT 8) BY I-7 TO I TOTAL AREA-.254 ACRES ~pC\p~ ~, N App \~ p ~~ti ~ ~ ~~ TAX PARCEL 95.03-2-19 DELTA CURVE ANGLE RADIUS ARC 7-I 78°28'11' 30.00' 41.09 LINE BEARING DISTANCE I-2 N 88°49'16'E 67.08' 2-3 S 20°38"16"W 182.13' 3-4 S 48°27'01'W 111.21' 4-5 N 41°32'59"~Y 40.00' 5-6 N 48°27'01"E 105.00' 6-7 N 20°38'16"E 114.63' r `., .J" 11 ><~ ~ ~, Cl~nr,l ~-~ i~ ~"= /•1 ~'r~ ~i Rr. f;1{c i.iL'RfIY ~-,~ ~ ~ CE'2TliiCnTE Plo. ~ ~'~ .,.. ~ ~' 926 ~; ~;~, ~~, LANll TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING 24.50' 37.95' N 18°35'34-W i PLAT SHOWING PART OF GREEK GI~c~E TO BE VACATED FOR ~,USTOM DEY~'~Ot~M~1Jr C.~RPC~RTIoN NlINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT-ROANOKE COUNTY-VIK~iNiA SCALE I'-100' JUNE 15. 1994 CHARLES R. MCMURRY-CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR DALEVILLE. VIRGINIA 24083-0097 13 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CREEK CIRCLE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF MISTY FOREST SUBDIVISION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance on a petition to vacate and close an unimproved portion of right-of-way known as Creek Circle, as shown on the 'Plat Showing Part of Creek Circle to be Vacated for Custom Development Corporation' dated June 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. BACKGROUND: Creek Circle (Route 938) extends from Whistler Drive (Route 937) in an easterly, then southerly, direction to its intersection with Berry Lane (also Route 938). This major portion of Creek Circle is in the state secondary road system. An additional, smaller portion of Creek Circle extends in a southwesterly direction from the intersection with Berry Lane, as shown on the attached plat. This section of Creek Circle is unimproved, is not in the state secondary road system, and is the subject of this request to vacate. Creek Circle appears to have been created by an unrecorded plat dated March 12, 1959, for Norwood Corporation. It has been shown as a road on the Roanoke County Land Records (Tax Map #95.03) for many years, and thus has been treated for tax purposes as a public road. However, it has not been conveyed to the County or dedicated to public use. Based upon this status, the Petitioner is requesting vacation of the unimproved portion of Creek Circle to the extent that any County or public interest may exist. ~~~. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The initial request for vacation was received from Corpre, Inc., a Virginia corporation, as owner of a tract of land, containing 111.888 acres (as surveyed April 21, 1994), and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos. 95.03-2-17, 95.03-2-18, and 95.03-2-19. On or about September 8, 1994, the property was sold to Custom Development Corporation, a Virginia corporation, the current Petitioner. The subject portion of Creek Circle is bounded on all sides, except to the north at the intersection with Berry Lane, by the Petitioner's property. Custom Development Corporation has filed development plans with the Roanoke County Department of Engineering and Inspections, which include subdivision of a portion of its property into Misty Forest Subdivision, to the east of and including a portion of the undeveloped section of Creek Circle (if vacated). The unimproved portion of Creek access by the Petitioner or by the reviewed the request to vacate, and Circle is not required public. County staff has determined that section of Creek Circle does not serve the public and does directly affect any property owners other than the Petitioner. FISCAL IMPACTS' None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate and close, to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, the unimproved portion of right-of-way known as Creek Circle. Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. Huf n Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs for has this not 0 z U - M F- Oi W Oi z- C <~ ~w m Z O ¢ V pO ~N ~ ~i O rs. ~ ~ ~ ' ~~^ ~ /y g0 \ \ /ST ~~ <F ~\ ' 9~~ \ <~NCC` \ \ RT~c\ NOTES : \ 9`~8 \ I ) SEE PLAT C.R. MCMURRY \g~'S' r DATED MAY 12 1994 FOR "MISTY EDGE OF ' FOREST' SUBDIVISION PLAT. PAVEMENT 2) SEE PLAT C.R. MCMURRY NEW DATED APRIL 21 1994 FOR LOT 10 PLAT OF 111.888 ACRES FOR 1.650 LARRY FENZEL. ACRES 3) AREA TO BE VACATED BOUNDED (OLD LOT 8) BY I-7 TO I TOTAL AREA-.254 ACRES ~O~ \o r A \ ~ ~ O RoOFIy <p~s ~ ~~N ~ ~ ~~ TAX PARCEL 95.03-2-19 DELTA CURVE ANGLE RADIUS ARC 7-I 78°28'11" 30.00' 41.09 LINE BEARING DISTANCE I-2 N 88°49'16"E 67.08' 2-3 S 20°38'16'W 182.13' 3-4 S 48°27'01'W 111.21' 4-5 N 41°32'59"VU 40.00' 5-6 N 48°27'01'E 105.00' 6-7 N 20°38'16'E 114.63' . ,i .~ ;~L'C=~ ~'~~"".. R. i;1ci.iUKKY ~.S ra ~+ ~ cc~~incnrE rlo. , _r ~ 's 926 :,° ~fri.,, y:`, ._~.~ TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING 24.50' 37.95' N 18°35'34'W r PLAT SHOWING PART OF CR ELK ctac~E TO BE VACATED FOR (,U STOM D r Y~' ~ OI' Mbt~7C- C~RPc~(~ AT Io N NlINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT-ROANOKE COUNTY-VIK~iNiA SCALE I'-100' JUNE 15. 1994 CHARLES R. MCMURRY-CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR DALEVILLE. VIRGINIA 24083-0097 N W I ~"~ ~ ~ O /~~ Y~ `'~l of ~ m~ ~: ' °e . U. a ~x 0 •.. r ~~ ~~ /® -~ _ 13 LOCATION MAP ~'~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CREEK CIRCLE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF MISTY FOREST SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Custom Development Corporation, the current petitioner, and Corpre, Inc., the initial petitioner, have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close an unimproved portion of right-of-way, forty feet (40') in width, known as Creek Circle, located on the east side of the proposed Misty Forest Subdivision in the Windsor Hills District of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the public hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on September 27, 1994; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on October 11, 1994. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That an unimproved portion of right-of-way known as Creek Circle, as shown on the 'Plat Showing Part of Creek Circle to be Vacated for Custom Development Corporation' dated June 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto, created by an unrecorded plat for Norwood Corporation dated March 12, 1959, shown on the Roanoke County Land Records (Tax Map #95.03), and bounded by property owned by Custom Development Corporation which is designated on the ~~ Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos. 95.03-2-17, 95.03-2-18, and 95.03-2-19, be, and hereby is, vacated to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, pursuant to Section 15.1- 482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance, together with a copy of the attached plat, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the current Petitioner, Custom Development Corporation, or its successors or assigns; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ACTION NO. ~,. ~. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A 4.41-ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-11) KNOWN AS THE OGDEN COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATED AT 2932 OGDEN ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: If we receive an acceptable offer for the Ogden Center, I would recommend that we accept it. However, }f the offers r~eived are substantially lower than the assessed value of the property, and we have to relocate the bal~eld that is located there, I would prefer to hold the property and not seU it at this time. The location is strategic and we can use the building for storage or perhaps remove the building and use it for additional park space. We wiU provide i~{formation on aU offers received at the Board mP,etin~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of a 4.41-acre parcel of real estate (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) located at 2932 Ogden Road. BACKGROUND' The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, previously declared this property to be surplus and available for sale to the public on January 26, 1993. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County has advertised this property for sale, has been actively marketing this property, and is in the process of receiving bids. The legal advertisement established a deadline for the receipt of bids to be October 7, 1994. The second reading and public hearing on the sale of this property is scheduled for October 11, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT' Funds received from the sale of this property will be deposited into the Capital Projects Fund, net of expenses incurred during marketing of this real estate. 1'I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of ordinance accepting a bid is scheduled for the Board's meeting on October 11, 1994. Respectfully submitted, v• W ohn D. Willey Property Manager Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs realest.ogdensal s~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE AN A 4.41- ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 77.15- 1-11) KNOWN AS THE OGDEN COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATED AT 2932 OGDEN ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on September 27, 1994; and a second reading was held on October 11 1994, concerning the sale and disposition of a 4.41-acre parcel of real estate known as the Ogden Community Center, Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11; and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of for to purchase this property is hereby accepted; and 4. That all net proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c:\wp51\agenda\realesta\ogden.ord + . 1~ ~ ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY~ VIRGINIA, $ELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLUTION 101194-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVI80R8 AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 11, 1994, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. 2. Resolution of Support to Establish a National "Green Day". 3. Request from the Virginia Association of Counties for a Resolution of Support for Constitutional Amendment 2. 4. Donation of a Water Line Easement at Chateau Mont Condominiums. 5. Request from Appalachian Power for Support for Boat Restrictions Upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. 6. Statement of Support for Locating the National D- Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford, or County of Bedford. 7. .Request for Acceptance of Hidden Woods Drive, Fairway Ridge Road, and Hidden Woods Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Request for Acceptance of Camney Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 9. Request for Acceptance of Chester Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution with Item 3 removed for separate vote, and revision to Resolution in Item 5, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve Item 3, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Elizabeth Leah, Registrar Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney A-101194-8.a ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the September 27, 1994 meeting. 1. Community Corrections Resources Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Joseph M. Vulgan to serve as an alternate for a one-year term expiring August 31, 1995. 2. Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Supervisor Minnix nominated Arthur M. Whittaker to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Minnix. The term will expire February 10, 1995. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: x_ (~dPllx_ M;~~ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Community Corrections Resource Board File Roanoke Regional Airport Commission File ( i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLUTION 101194-8.b SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE AMERICAN SHOWS FOR A NATIONAL ~~GREEN DAYS' WHEREAS, in 1994, the American Shows, in cooperation with other local organizations, sponsored "Green Day" during the Lawn- Garden and Flower Show held at the Salem Civic Center; and WHEREAS, American Shows offered free admission to citizens who delivered cans and newspapers to their recycle collection bins, with all proceeds going to educational programs of the Clean Valley Council; and WHEREAS, this event included involvement from organizations such as Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems, Valley Beautiful, the Roanoke Times and World News and the Roanoke City and Roanoke County Solid Waste Departments; and WHEREAS, American Shows would like to establish a national "Green Day" to educate and promote recycling awareness with the collection of aluminum cans and newspapers; and WHEREAS, American Shows is requesting the endorsement of local and state governments for this project. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors supports efforts to reduce the waste stream and to preserve our natural resources; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors specifically endorses the establishment of a "Green Day" on a national level, and offers it best wishes to American Shows for a successful campaign. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Keith Martin, American Shows Ann Masters, Clean Valley Council ACTION NO. ~'"~ ITEM NUMBER ` ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Resolution of Support for a National "Green Day" COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~~~~~ ~tti~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a letter from Keith Martin of American Shows. This organization held a "Green Day" on March 18, 1994, during the Lawn- garden & Flower Show at the Salem Civic Center. They provided can and newspaper recycle collection bins for admission to the show. The 1994 event was coordinated by a variety of local organizations including Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems and the city and county solid waste departments. The American Shows would like to take "Green Day" to a national level and are seeking endorsements from local and state governments. They will be sponsoring this recycling program in cooperation with Clean Valley Council. The attached letter provides more information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution, and that the resolution be forwarded to the American Shows and to the Clean Valley Council. Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens September 21, 1994 A~~~ S~~wti Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: The first annual "Green Day" was held at the Salem Civic Center during the LAWN-GARDEN & FLOWER SHOW an Friday, March 18, 1994. Thousands of local residents showed their support by delivering cans and newspapers to our collection bins for admission to the show. The 1994 sponsors, coordinators or support groups were Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems, Roanoke City and County Solid Waste Departments, Valley Beautiful, Virginia Skyline Girl Scout Council, WROV-FM, Roanoke Times & World News, Steak & Ale, City of Salem, Salem Civic Center and American Shows. Our plans are to take "Green Day" to a national level. Before doing that, we are seeking endorsements from the local and state levels. We here at American Shows would like it to be known that the Greater Roanoke Valley and its governments, are behind us 100% in this recycling effort. I am requesting your endorsement of "Green Day". This recycling program was designed by American Shows in cooperation with Clean Valley Council. Its purpose is to educate and promote recycling awareness with the collection of aluminum cans and newspapers. Also included in this program is the distribution of free evergreens donated by the Virginia Forestry Department. All proceeds from this recycling collection go directly to the educational programs of the Clean Valley Council. I am sure you will see thls special day can be a benefit to every state in the United States where waste stream reduction and preservation of natural resources is a mission. Your endorsement letter would be greatly appreciated. For additional information, please call me or Ann Masters of Clean Valley Council (345-5523). K-a. Sincerely, ~~- rn~;K, Ke i t h Marti n AMERICAN SHOWS 3204 Williamson Rd., N.W. • Roanoke, Virginia 24012 • (703) 366-6679 • FAX (703) 563-0510 K- ~ Letters are being sent to the following offices asking for their endorsement letters as well: James Tallaferro City of Salem Mayor lmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator Gerald A. Burgess Botetourt County Administrator Charles R. Hill Vinton Town Mayor David Bowers City of Roanoke Mayor i~- ~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLIITION SIIPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE AMERICAN SHOWS FOR A NATIONAL "GREEN DAY" WHEREAS, in 1994, the American Shows, in cooperation with other local organizations, sponsored "Green Day" during the Lawn- Garden and Flower Show held at the Salem Civic Center; and WHEREAS, American Shows offered free admission to citizens who delivered cans and newspapers to their recycle collection bins, with all proceeds going to educational programs of the Clean Valley Council; and WHEREAS, this event included involvement from organizations such as Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems, Valley Beautiful, the Roanoke Times and World News and the Roanoke City and Roanoke County Solid Waste Departments; and WHEREAS, American Shows would like to establish a national "Green Day" to educate and promote recycling awareness with the collection of aluminum cans and newspapers; and WHEREAS, American Shows is requesting the endorsement of local and state governments for this project. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors supports efforts to reduce the waste stream and to preserve our natural resources; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors specifically endorses the establishment of a "Green Day" on a national level, and offers it best wishes to American Shows for a successful campaign. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLIITION 101194-8.c SIIPPORTING ADOPTION OF CONSTITIITION AMENDMENT 2 WHEREAS, Virginia's Constitution requires that voter lists be automatically purged of people who have not voted in four years; and WHEREAS, Virginia also requires that applications to register to vote be completed in front of the registrar; and WHEREAS, these rules conflict with new federal laws and if Virginia does not conform, Virginia registrars will have to keep two sets of voter registrations - one for state elections and one for federal elections; and WHEREAS, this would be time-consuming and costly for local electoral boards and local governments; and WHEREAS, Constitutional Amendment 2 on the ballot on November 8 seeks to resolve the issue by bringing Virginia's constitution into conformity with federal law; thereby saving local governments thousands of dollars. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, joins the Board of Directors of the Virginia Association of Counties in supporting Constitutional Amendment 2, and urges the citizens of Roanoke County to vote yes on Constitutional Amendment 2. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File James D. Campbell, Executive Director, VACo Elizabeth Leah, Roanoke County Registrar v ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request from VACo for Resolution in Support of Constitutional Amendment 2. COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval If the Constiuutional Amendment is not approved by the state, it will require double recordkeepingand additional votingmachines to accommodate separatingthe d4,o'erent voters registeringjor state/local and or federal elections. The Roanoke County Registrar recommends approval as dons the Regidrars' Association. SIIMMARY OF INFORMATION: I recently received the attached request from the Virginia Association of Counties for adoption of a resolution of support for Constitutional Amendment 2. This amendment would bring Virginia's constitution regarding voter registration into compliance with new federal laws. Virginia's constitution requires voter lists be automatically purged of people who have not voted in four years and requires applications to register to vote be completed in front of the registrar. Both these two rules conflict with the new federal legislation. Constitutional Amendment 2 will be on the ballot on November 8, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted and send to the Roanoke Valley members of the General Assembly and to the Virginia Association of Counties. lmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens '~'A Assoc of Counties Fax~804-788-0083 Sep 30 '9~ 045 8.0101 .' << t.,1 L~~. VIRGINIA ASSC7CIATI~lr1 (~F BOUNTIES K- .~ 1pp1 East Broad Street • Suite LL 20 • Rid~mond, Virginia 23219-1901 ~ (804) 788-6652 • fax (804) 788-0083 Memo -- by fc~x Ta: County Administrators, County Managers, County Executives FROM: C. Flippo Hicks, General Counsel BATE: September 29,1994 SUBJECT: Suggested ztexn fox Board of Supervisors Agenda PAGES: x page The VACo Board of Directors urges every county to adopt this resolution. The VACo board also asks that each county publicize its resolution through local newspapers, TV stations, radio stations and other media outlets. Whereas Virginia's Constitution requires that voter lists be automatically purged of people who have not voted in four years; Whereas Virginia also requires that applications to a;egister to vote be completed in front of the registrar; Whereas these two rules conflict ~vaith new fed- eral laws; Whereas if Virginia does not conform its laws to the federal Iaws then Virginia registrars will have to keep two sets of voter registrations -Dane for state elections and one for federal elections; Whereas keeping two sets of voter registrations will betime-consuming and costly for local electoral boards and local gavernadnents; Whereas Constitutional Amendment 2 on the ballot Dan November 8,1994, seeks to resolve the issue by changing 'V'irginia's Constitution so that it conforms with federal law, thereby saving the local governments of Virgi.zvia thousands of dollars that can be better used far local needs; Whereas the Board of Directors of the Virginia Association of Counties unanimously endorses Constitutional Amendment 2 and urges the board of supervisors of every county in Virginia to adopt a resolution of support and to publicize its actions; Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of County voices its support for Constitutional Arnenda~x~.ent 2 and urges the citizens of County to vote yes on Constitutional Amend- ment 2. Thank you for your assistance with this issue. .» AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ADOPTION OF CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT 2 WHEREAS, Virginia's Constitution requires that voter lists be automatically purged of people who have not voted in four years; and WHEREAS, Virginia also requires that applications to register to vote be completed in front of the registrar; and WHEREAS, these rules conflict with new federal laws and if Virginia does not conform, Virginia registrars will have to keep two sets of voter registrations - one for state elections and one for federal elections; and WHEREAS, this would be time-consuming and costly for local electoral boards and local governments; and WHEREAS, Constitutional Amendment 2 on the ballot on November 8 seeks to resolve the issue by bringing Virginia's constitution into conformity with federal law; thereby saving local governments thousands of dollars. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, joins the Board of Directors of the Virginia Association of Counties in supporting Constitutional Amendment 2, and urges the citizens of Roanoke County to vote yes on Constitutional Amendment 2. A-101194-8.d ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water line easement at Chateau Mont Condominiums to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~, ~ ~~G~'"~ usy+ti SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of an easement for water line purposes, upon, over, under and across 1.73 acres of land developed as Chateau Mont Condominiums, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke as follows: a) Donation of a water line easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, from Chateau Mont Condominium Unit Owners' Association (Deed Book 1313, page 541, and Deed Book 1313, page 584) (Tax Map No. 87.16-1-1.1), shown and designated as "WATERLINE ESMT." upon the plat, dated October 8, 1991, made by Philip W. Nester, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Res ectfully submitted, is ie L. H m Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by _ H. Odell Minnix Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Nickens x Minnix x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility ~~ra _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ ~r--_ _-->_~ ------- - M MAP BOOK 10~ PAGE 65 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ti^` 220 ~ ~ ~ °. _ ui~~s "4sr 4 / ~ s +'° .. 4, .~ ~ 1 +~`3 ~~ S~ ~ i ~ DARCEL "G / r n... ~ ~ ~ _ vQ + , ~ - / I ` - - _ - C`° VICINITY MAD / / ~ t ~j0021~00~~W ~v'14/~\ SZI°13'14"E ` ~ ~ / / ~aP~ (04.89' C ~ I 30.00' 1" = I MI IE / BLOGK 2 SECTION I ~L\PyQ __ _ ~ uUNTING uILLS PLACE ~2^„ '~_ ~ ~ y ` ~ ~ Sodzl'oo"w LoT I Z ~ \ I 25.05' ~ I?W ~ a = 1 ~ ---_ ------- - -_~~ lU II BRICK `\II I d \ ~ PROP GARAGE ~ I ~p„~ ~ LoT 2 BY 07N ERS IJ ~ A ~ I / A o b W. I z \~ / - _ --- _ IO Q l~ er dPdI EV15TING °L 'I (- - - - - - J M A SPNALT O II \ 1 I I rl - ~1 ~ ~,~ 0 ~~ ° II II N89~39~OO~W ~ 1 ~ 2'$ FR Z ~C~ ~ EI I z 100.00' \ ~ LOT 3 I TOwN HOU$E N ~ p II F ~ `}- ~ II `/ II II Q I \\ ~Nr \ I I~ I ~ _ ~ ~, s (I I i II 3 ~ 9 7. 50' s(z ~ I ~ w-` o ~ I m II III PARCEL ~A' ~G B( \\ ~ ~ - - 500 21 00 W STUB UO a /11~ II a 7/J,° ~N52°12 30"E 122.01' rM xMP ~ m di ASPHALT II I~" r ~ ~ 3 ,.P _ __ _ ~o ~==_JI 2~ //v/ F /~jy 7 `gyp "C~~ 31' 10 .33' S I corK[[. ~( G (~ C j / \ 9p'~ O I W I } ~ STILV l5T1NW Z S iOO E // o~~a ~sAy \\~F~sF .5 - o z~ S49°5450,w l~' ~ cZ ~ MAIN FIN. FL.= 91.0 IOW I // GI.C01' . / / (oT (~' I GARAGE FIN.Ft_._ 81.0 _ ImF I Q / / / ~ F / $ I ~ `aQ / 5 / A ~ YM I3 I / / 'lJO i ~O $.0' OFF ~ ~ / / ~ C c C BLDG. 105.50 C 0 I~~/ /~ \ a-i ~~; I I m - \ \ /~° ~Df' / D~EGK I STAIRS ~ 5 / / /y~~ \ \S ~ ~~ \ I I O COMMON LJ ~EMENt .PE y~ / / ~ / °~~/ 0 \ ~ (} ELEMENT ~ ~/ v,o / (/~ ^. ~ \ \ S \ \ I I I 95.33 `D.Y..,!/.Ch,f%~ / ~ ~c ~~ / / \ \ A / 5 I 0" P.E DO'W45 PgJT l0" P ~C / ~S / \ \ T~\( COLLECTOR v u~T CD.\~ ~' / \ \ se<o F 1.73 ACRE eY RKE / 4yt / / \ \ \ \ wOa ~ 6 w AIR RELEASE VALVE e / / \\\et. \\ STE RI=MT ~ /rte ~ / \ ~ \ _ ~ y , \ ~A'~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ -r ~ 5 S / 'C / J~pJ r- REVISED OCTOBER 8 , 1991 \ ~ ~ I I ~ - ~0 MIN. SEQ. ~ / M E ~ ~ BASED ON ' AS BUILT " \ /t/ ~~ l 9 PUg LIC ~~ EPSE '~A // G_ ~ PLANS BY SPECTRUM \ \ G /V ~ 6' I _ - _ ~ ~ _ u 7 I L I T Y i ~~~ v / ENGINEERS - ROANOKE , VA, 3 _~ ~ \ \ \ 3Z. 02 OO,.~ - - ~ - - - - - - ~ SE ~ ~\ i F-.xrn nl I ..~,. O' t~pN ~~~~ P.4RCEL'E CONNEC ~ ~~~CHATEAU MONT. ~_,` NIL~S CONDOMINIUMS _ _ ~ rnvt~ If _ i shHtrlr, nls elrr rv,lrs: ~ _ - _ - _ ~ Ilnnnnxr courrly. vlltr,ln[n Ill1VF'MRE.H 15, I')9/ I Ph'FFIl Ffl('I '. 1 fi~~~iK I, Dill full-113YR )'~-F~ IhY uFFI Ith u(F I I I I Ili I x I'/,f,F i,H, in15 Is r.:'r II r ncl I nl.ll nF su~rrrl,a~~_ rrl~Ill I~'AI4 DECLARANT: BRADHILL CORPORATION 1`t:nt HAI. iItiII;.A l I ~i.Ii II II 111 I I Vn'li IIA/A I~ nnuulAev Llnr nm nlnl Iln II I nrnror l'rIRIIF+ Iln, I.Ir:; I~IAI nru rl,r,ll nr ~~~uu~r:lulr+~.rra tIOI IOC 11Th 1'I A ..I I~'Iw. I~I,.,, I~ I ~. ~,~ ~ cllf'.ule l.It ll ~ lil°. Illq ~,r VIF SIRFI I:, tI~HHFt'I 'I IIAI !I .. IOTAI I I;K lilf'~ til'ArrS I i~-.Ir II 11111 :-~~,fll Iti (\ ti II `/Iti ill ~il I.AU Ally C'11f11~ Ifl'1lil'; ,III I I Ile ~, H1I11.1 Iflt: I~:fIII I1 I.It 'r'I IAIFAII "l II.'11 I I; I !'~fll p' =~I II III .1.5 ItF. ~iI;I~F It A ~rlf; 111h. I Afll~ I?FC~tIt CIS rt F' Ifl fflF: (;I FIK C ill I/'I ~~I Illy 1-II~~'lll ~ 1... ,I, 'llh 1't ~I III I'/ ril~ It'~AfI~~KF .'~~11111V ~Ilt(;IfIIA Ifl f~F l.II 4 P nR { A(~h A~Ifi ~~ IHF. If11'11r~'/[-: II ~ I.r)CAII'L~ Illlf'F )f! ~r1fIS 1511!1.' -~F (~Ill~ H ~AfI~)KE, Vllt[:IIIIA III- I`I.A A. ~-I II-I~ ~~f III'S fiUll,l~lflf 1tIlAlulflt. '1';; hill / I~)UH l 1715 Af'Ift fllAi I rl{AS f3FF:.7 I A `/ rNr.~~AIE^ lulttu•all In nun ul r ~n,ll Inure ~lF ulr ~orr r~l of _ _-. I" 11~ _I III I6 ~ P_I I .,rVl I. I.:~'.IFUI blc~;lnl~ r9 N.ILPII III, I.I I I 'nr. rlr -.nnl+u ~. nrr: I 'I ~Ih RF It rl t'~Ip ~ PIIR :IIff lhHllb' IIAI II!I I. ~'All~'f15 Ail[' ICI Pr151 "rIA OI- AI,I. r.'. ~ Annr:xrr~ nl I,u~r~ I 1 I~ ~ ~~ r•.r.l5lul, Inrlnl~l.ltll5 Iln.l: I:FPn rnltrt'nll,v r:alnrtl,l;nrn av n~~IFF: I,-._ n II~nn511 Inrr Sulde-r nnI nlAr, nnll'-5 11uu~11-ISl< srr1.; LT t'Li~_iix- _ I ru~ r,F. nl+t- n v l u,Lr: r rn'. t~n~-lu-+F n I s -"' 6~ K ~F IMF I"I;'/ !11... IIiAI All ~I ~ •. 6UI.IIIPIt t'hHII~~V ~ 1. _. 11.fllrll LI,, ,.,,I ~. Olt 1 LfI~,IIS I'HLRPOP, 0~ P~wr~ I rI~ICII. ~,,I ul Ilnl AuI rl nn .n r ml rrrn lnra ~ 1 .1 :II' SuI I~Ib L .fl HAbI IiIF 1 SIh IAUI IAI Y f A!, IIA I0~'I 1 I. •n'LF II-n. IIII' ~ ~A•~~ I ;Illfl 'lll~ Ht Ilrll ~..I. ('IIAII~.A1I l.lr~f lI ~ ,'I'.'. ~. '.. ,,. IMF 1, I ~~;.I 11111 IS_ I I AI I~I~'~I- SIIti.II IIFI~ IA[1i1. V CERfIFIGTE Np. I I p'~~ 1~ I I - ..I "I ~"'f I'`x' ~+ _ _ Oct A. /99/ ~ OLT 0 B IOtl 1 I '' ___-_ I'til ill F' III'. I`~ I'. iii _. _ _ __....______-.__ D I~nf6 4,y E~ I' ~ ,Arll Igl'Y I II I~n. -5-o r. r.~ ~ I.-. ..I OSURN It - t n I [. . IrtY UO" r~A ' ill.°Lr ® - I1' ~In nu' 62.11 ''•t, I~t'i~ II IItil gilt -'I~It I~r~v O A I'/.~ I..,! ~ l!. ,'.f.' I ~;Ii~ I~. AIfI '.Af1111i1.F 9 I '~. I ~ !1!1 I I I II '. r..' 1a.F ~ It 'I~il~" II ,I'"'~i f~ ~ ,.. f~ S i'h. .. )•F' Si `N II I 1 . ~ I1i - ~~ i , ' LI.LI' ~f,~ ' '' 4~, ~'I1f+:, I. "A" c'1111 J1~ •.IS" r'f)I~;~I._ "f'~• r'llll Vl.: "I~" _ CIIHVE; "F•• I'llI I.I I'-;,. III.SIF.H, I;If'. I`.r~, i ~ H,~,~~ i~~K'/'.~!Ilfll 'J llt~~lfll.l 2~.1'~ It ..r ~,- r 1<_. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T$E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLIITION 101194-8.e ENDORSING APPALACHIAN POWER~B APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND INLAND FISHERIES FOR BOATING RESTRICTIONS IIPSTREAM OF THE NIAGARA DAM ON THE ROANORE RIVER WHEREAS, Appalachian Power installed a boat restraining barrier upstream of the Niagara Dam in 1991; and WHEREAS, the barrier is designed to prohibit boaters from entering hazardous areas due to river flow through the powerhouse and over the top of the dam; and WHEREAS, while the barrier is effective, law enforcement officials have no authority to issue summonses for violations; and WHEREAS, Appalachian Power has applied to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for authority to install "No Boat" signs on the barrier and enable law enforcement officials to enforce these restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports Appalachian Power Company's application to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to establish legally enforceable boating restrictions immediately upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File C. Michael Thacker, Hydro Reservoir Superintendent, APCO Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries ACTION NO. ~./ ITEM NUMBER 1, r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Appalachian Power for Resolution of Support for Boat Restrictions Upstream of the Niagara Project. COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~rfxn~~r SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company has requested through Supervisor Nickens that the Board of Supervisors endorse their efforts to restrict boats from the area immediately upstream of the Niagara Project on the Roanoke River. In 1991, APCO officials installed a boat restraining barrier which is designed to prohibit boaters from entering areas upstream from the dam. The barrier has been considered effective, but law enforcement officials do not have the authority to issue summonses for violations. APCO has applied to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for authorization to install "No Boat" signs on the barrier, but DGIF has requested local support for their application. Attached is correspondence from C. Michael Thacker, Hydro Reservoir Superintendent for Appalachian Power. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution and forward copies to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries and Appalachian Power. Submitted by: ../V Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Appr ved by• ..~-~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ..~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens flf':T-G14-1994 1 ~: 1 G1 FRfIM APf'fl HYnRf1 ~ •~ f ~ Ap'siaChiaa Power Canpaa~r PO Box 2021 P oanoke ~ • . , 703 985 2 Mr. Harry C. Nickens Roanokc County Baard of Supervisors 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W. Roanoke, VA 24018 pear Mr. Nickens: Tfl 977?19~ P. G11 ArP~LA~CMIAIM POWER Thank you far yuur• willingness i;o seek a resolution of support from the Roanoke County Soard of Supervisors to restrict boats from the area immediately uNsl.r•eam c-~ our Niagara Project on the Roanoke River. This letter will serve to support my previously faxed resolution request. As you are aware, we installed a boat reslr•aining barrier upstream of the Niagara Dam in 1991. This barrier consists of pontoon-type floats attached to a cable and a rope which span the reservoir frutri shore to shore. The barrier is located some 800 feet upstream of the dam. Its purpose is two-fold. Nrimarily, it is designed to prohibit boaters from entering an area we consider hazardous due to river flow through our powerhouse and, during high water, over the top of the dam. Second, it serves as an escape device for disabled boaters or others without capability to avoid being tarried into the hazardous area. While the barrier has been in place for some time and is generally effective, law enforcement officials are without authority to issue summonses for violations. As a result, we have applied to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (DGIF) for authority to install "No 6o~t" signs nn the barrier and enable these officials to enforce a restriction intended to benefit and protect the pub]it. A copy of our application to the DGIF, which includes other projects as well, is attached along with a rory of the proposed resolution which was faxed to you earlier. Thanks again for your assistance and support. Sincerely, I ~~ J C. Michael Thacker Hyclr•u Reservoi r Superi ntcndent CMT:mw Attachments Gopy w/0 attchs.: Mr. Jut~n W. Meylep Mr. M. Bahleda TOTAL P.01 ~'S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1994 RESOLUTION ENDORSING APPALACHIAN POWER'S APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND INLAND FISHERIES FOR BOATING RESTRICTIONS UPSTREAM OF THE NIAGARA DAM ON THE ROANORE RIVER WHEREAS, Appalachian Power installed a boat restraining barrier upstream of the Niagara Dam in 1991; and WHEREAS, the barrier is designed to prohibit boaters from entering hazardous areas due to river flow through the powerhouse and over the top of the dam; and WHEREAS, while the barrier is effective, law enforcement officials have no authority to issue summonses for violations; and WHEREAS, Appalachian Power has applied to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for authority to install "No Boat" signs on the barrier and enable law enforcement officials to enforce these restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports Appalachian Power Company's application to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to establish legally enforceable boating restrictions immediately upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. A-101194-8.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Statement of Support for Locating the National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford, or County of Bedford COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On August 23, 1994, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution expressing support for the construction of a national D-Day memorial to be located in the Roanoke Valley. Since that time, the Bedford City Council and Bedford County Board of Supervisors have also expressed a strong desire that the memorial be located in the City of Bedford. They have expressed a willingness to commit contributions of over $250,000 toward the construction of the memorial, as well as provide for care and maintenance of the memorial when it is complete. Bedford, Virginia lost 23 soldiers in the D-Day Invasion which is the highest per capita loss of soldiers of any locality in the United States. The Bedford area was also highlighted during the recent ceremonies commemorating the 50th anniversary of the allied invasion. Supervisor Nickens has requested that the Board of Supervisors expand the definition of the Roanoke Valley in the resolution previously adopted to include the City of Bedford and County of Bedford for consideration of the National D-Day Memorial. This would not diminish our support for a location in the Roanoke Valley, but would emphasize our desire that the memorial be placed in Southwest Virginia where a major contingent was involved in the invasion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors publicly state and advise the Chairman of the D-Day Memorial Committee that they support locating the National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford or County of Bedford. x Submitted By: ~~~ ~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board ~ < ~~ Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X ) Motion by: x_ ~c~P~ i M; nn; x No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendation Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Chairman, D-Day Memorial Committee The Honorable G. Michael Shelton, Mayor, City of Bedford rF>C1G1 G ITY OF EEDFOFiJ 70S-5o~F-? 1 ~~ ;WEDa 10, OG' 9~ 14 ; ~3i aT. 14 ; 21%N0, SaG02~'SOo F ~ . ~•- 1'IESOLUTION TO SUPPORT LOCA.TTON QF NA'Y'iONA~. n-DAY MEMdRYA.L IN ' CLITY OF BEDF(3IltD, VIItGITVX~ >,~ WHEREAS, on June G, 1944, Allied forces embarked oz~ artd carried out the greatest land invasion the world has known, which ultimately changed the cc»zree of history; and ~VX~RE~!$, in June 1994, on the 50th Anni.ver5a~y of the D-Day Invasion, national and international attention centered on Bedford as the result of its soldiers from Company A, l l~bth Infantry, 29th Divisiozr being in the first wave of the Invasion, and Bedford, Virgina having the solezz~,n distlraCtion of being the comxnun.ity that. hA.d the highest per capita 1oS5 of lives during the Invasion; and because of this historic event Bedford assisted in changing the history of the world; and Bedford being located between lwu rtiajor metropolitan areas, Roanoke and Lynchburg, with an excellent transportation access system and within a vne-day drive offifly per cent of the population of the United States; and WHFR$AS, by and through this distinction Bedford has earned the right to be the site of line NaliuTaRc} D-Day Meiiioria] because of tl,e deep community interest in its hi3tory and in this particular event, and this 1Vlemorial will provide a means of continual remembrance and ongoing education about D-Day in the world's history and specifically the role of the 116th l~nfantry and RPdforrl's rnlP and imnaet in thiq event; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES~lLV)CA that the City Council of the City ofBedford strongly encourages and supports the location of the ilTational D-Day Memorial to be in Bedford attd xs willing to commit to providing a significant conmbution toward this initiative to be estimated in excess r,f ~2~0,000. These eontri6utions are to include the donation of the site and improvements such as access and parking, infrastructure to include water, sewer and electric to lh~ sile, as well as reSLroona facilities. As a means to provide for the perpetual care and maintenarloe ofthe Memorial and improvements, the City will incorporate the facility into the City's parl~,s and recreation system. BE IT FURT~R)Lt)ES4LVElD that the City Council 01• the City of Bedford calls upon al] jurisdictions wliu a,'e a part of the 11Gth ln£antry to bECOrt1,C regions] partners in this e~'ort and request these same localities to support the Location of this memorial in Bedford, Virginia, based upon, its historic significance, its central Location of those communities who are within the ] 16th Infantry, and the national and worldwide knowledge of Bedford's rote in the D-Day Invasion. It is a suitable, logical location for a monument that honors all branches of the armed forces and specifically those soldiers who were involved in D-Day. $~ ~T FU>Et'T)EiER RESOLVER that a Bogy of this resolution be mailed to the National D-Day Memorial Foundation and to all governing bodies of jurisdictions which are members of the 116th Infantry. nnA~M.tu:s ~FROht CITY GF BEDFORD 70S-~oG-71ST ;WED) 10. O6' 9~ 1~,2~/ST. 1~,~'/N0. ~~G02~7~Oo F ~~ I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and exact dopy o£ a Resolution adopted at a regular meeting ol: the Council of the City ofBedford, Virginia, held on September 27, 1994, at which said meeting a quorum was present acid voted. Taeputy Clert~ of the Council T7AAYMEM.RES ~a~ . ,~`~r! , K-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994 RESOLUTION 82394-7.e OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL TO BE LOCATED IN THE ROANOKE VAI .i .RY WHEREAS, the 50th anniversary of the June 6, 1944 Normandy Invasion known as D-Day was recently recognized in the United States and throughout Europe, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley holds the distinction of having had a major contingent involved in the D-Day invasion, and WHEREAS, there is a need to honor in an appropriate manner the brave men and women from the allied nations who participated in the invasion, and WHEREAS, a memorial honoring the events, people and allied nations related to Omaha Beach and the 116th Lnfantry would be an attraction in the Roanoke Valley and contribute to the Overall economy, and WHEREAS, potential sites throughout the Roanoke Valley for the D-Day Memorial were studied and reviewed in 1990, and WHEREAS, a highly visible site has been identified that would provide access for public viewing of the memorial. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, supports the siting of a National D-Day Memorial, and encourages the completion of this important project. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minniac, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None ~~ A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist Mary Parker, Roanoke City Clerk Forest Jones, Salem City Clerk Carolyn Ross, Vinton Town Clerk Chairman, D-Day Memorial Committee J}~ ~. t, _~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLIITION 101194-8.cx REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HIDDEN WOODS DRIVE, FAIRWAY RIDGE ROAD, AND HIDDEN WOODS COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Su ervisors Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Edd Nays: None A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-8.g adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~. I / l~ i -...: \6623'- \ 9 ~~ _ l5 ' ~2,. 15 I ~- -' %~~;~,. ...._. `624 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~: 11 I 1 -c ~ ~ _ O .66/3 e , /~" ... ..~ 67/8 ; ;. .~ o. z c _-I:._ /// 11 'e 6707 2I 56/0 ~ ~ i% b6u ! p+ ~ 65J3 i 6331 Ulfwa' ~ \ a 61;8 67/7 :6.~0 ~7 .. I ., 7,:C/, I .=c ~ ~ \ ~ ss, 1 / ~~- ~.+.Jl~ 1 5 , .._ ° 6'' 39 ? 6123 \ .`Jt 61~, `I .6338 • 9 ~ 6j31 ~ 6110 ~ 30 ~ 659 ea ~0~_~6149 '., _ l „c 61j6 12 ~~ 6_ {I ~ J ~ d / / 6 , 6aa2 ~ 33 ~~ \ 4 612 I I ~ '656 ~ 6503 ~i e^ ~ i ~~~ ~\613 IU 119:.c 7 •. '~ ' / j 648 /' 3 5150 ~ ` 9 LOI do y, .. ~ 158 \ 8 \LO_ ^;, \ / ~F ^ v ~~ 6 ~~/// oirwoY Forest °~. 6'73 T I wc~ Es~oies „ Ia;... 1,z \:• \ 13 \ ,\ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY See Map 66.16 I"= 100' S n' n :_ ~ ' is . I o~i :: u Pl 16y.:~ z~ V ie'~ r T ._.. ~. + E "i PVC ~a>tl. .mac .; ."6ilO ~::: c424 4642r-. - DESCRIPTION: 1) Hidden Woods Drive from the intersection of Fairway Estates (Route 1388) to cul-de-sac (end). 2) Fairway Ridge Road from the intersection of Hidden Woods Drive to the intersection with Franklin Street (Route 693). 3) Hidden Woods Court from the intersection of Hidden Woods Drive to the cul-de-sac (end). LENGTH: RIGHT OF WAY: {1) (1) 0.62 MILES (2) 0.12 MILES (3) 0.10 MILES ROADWAY WIDT'd: (1) 50 30 FEET FEET (2) (2) 50 3 FEET (3} 50 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET (2) 0 2 FEET (3) 29 FEET SERVICE: (1) 14 HOMES (2) 0 FEET (3) 20 FEET 1 HOMES (3) 7 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & ACCEPTANCE OF HIDDEN WOODS DRIVE, FAIRWAY RIDGE ROAD AND HIDDEN WOODS COURT INTO THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM 3 r ,~ O ~ ,I U ~ ~ „I ~ ~ ~ cV O < U O O O c m E t U (~ Q 3 L 2 m 8 o is •• z n O ~ d ~ w ~ N ~ f N W O 'O ~ C O o° y ; L E ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ «. 2 O ~ ~ -` ,z C m M O m ~ M OMO M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m ui ci Q ~ °' a o_ a° d a a° a -• d ~ ~ M o~~ ~ ~~W a~~ ~ ~~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ N (n ~ W rn~~ l ~ ~ °~ ~ ,~ o~ g QQ ' m C & n Z. N ~ L ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ` ((~~,, N of _9 q~ aj f Z "~ O~ 3~ ~ p a O o ~ i O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E n U ` ~ 4 O ~ Q < Z b ~ O E O E ~N E _ IL F- d IL F- d LL 1- d lL H p, {~ H d ~y FO- 0. ~ 10- a ~ n 3 M L >_ c N ~ ~ ~ ~ y N (~Q~J U Q, C • S v; e ~ ~ P+ ~ Z b _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 .. $ ~ O y w Q Z ~ N m ~ ~, ,~ ~ s z d O H -~ ~ Q E H ~ U w W ~~ a ~~ z ~ ~ O ~ ` ~ U ~ O ~ ~ RW'. 7 Q ~,,, .~ H H 4 ~ A W LL ~ ~+ Z W ~ ~ z U W '~ A O z ~ ~i ITEM NUMBER -~---~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Hidden Woods Drive, Fairway Ridge Road and Hidden Woods Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,7 ~~ w ry~~ ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: R. William Reid Builders, the developer of Fairway Forest Estates, Section 3 and 4, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.62 miles of Hidden Woods Drive, 0.12 miles of Fairway Ridge Road and 0.10 miles of Hidden Woods Court. County staff have inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and found that these roads are acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS• County staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Hidden Woods Drive, Fairway Ridge Road and Hidden Woods Court into the Secondary Road System. SIT~MITTED BY: APPROVED: \! i Arnold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Ins ections County Administrator ~~.„ ~~~" ~ Approved Denied Received Referred to ( ) Motion by: ( ) ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 2 ~ \ /~ ,.:i. :.,: \6615'= \ 9 ~~ _/ ~~ C ' 6630 \\ 3 n ;,, l ~- 3~`'~ Is\ \ /~ ~ ~ ly ~ ..662/. ~ ~~// ~ 662.7 IS I ~ ~ ~• I c . ... ~ 14 h I I I I do ~ ~ f - ~ _ ~ Iq - . 66r5 9 I ~~ ' ~ 67/5 r ~ ~ ~ ~a LZ. ~ c 31:: ,off / erlj`..,, ,e .. ;/ 22 ' ' •21 ~ 20 ~, •• rsvs• - _~ ~ olcwa" U 6707 `66rr' fro ~•. ~' 6543 i 653r See Map 66.16 \ 62s/.6nz %o;~~ - „ 2 Lcl7,:./! I IO.c i„_ 100 3 "' I ' Z 1.. ~ 6602^cj ~_ '`J 3 .5t . •:~6;39 2 , 6j23 ~.`,/la 6~0~ `,.,\ ~I . ~65JB 9 5 °_ Ag ~ t p 2~ ~ 30 65ro ea 5 5 5 1 7 ` T \5 vti~ c 26 61 \ 1` ~ / 6_ ~ ~S 65?2~ 3 65.6 ~ 6503 ri m Ned ¢ 5154 119:.c ~ 7 r /~ ~_ 10 ~ _ 645 /' • 3 5T 50~ ~ ~ 9 LOI do r ~~~~~ .. ~: 1 a~- L~/ 558 8 \LO_::,c \ / Foiiw _ ~P YYY ~N 6475 7, f' 7 I cor: °y Forest Esio~es ,• ~~6~ei.: T42 ~ 6 ,~ ~ SOD 6421 ~ :.5' T : ,1 641 ~ .. PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY l DESCRIPTION: 1) Hidden Woods Drive from the intersection of Fairway Estates (Route 1388) to cul-de-sac (end). 2) Fairway Ridge Road from the intersection of Hidden Woods Drive to the intersection with Franklin Street (Route 693). 3) Hidden Woods Court from the intersection of Hidden Woods Drive to the cul-de-sac (end). LENGTH: RIGHT OF WAY: (1) (1) 0.62 50 MILES (2) 0.12 MILES (3) 0.10 MILES ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET FEET (2) (2) 50 30 FEET (3} 50 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET (2) 20 FEET FEET (3) (3) 29 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 14 __ HOMES (2) 1 HOMES (3) 7 FEET HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF HIDDEN WOODS DRIVE, FAIRWAY ENGINEERING & RIDGE ROAD AND HIDDEN WOODS COURT INTO THE INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM 3 K-~ The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 11th day of October, 1994, adopted the following: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5 (a) , fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to X33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote A Copy Teste: Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: Mary Allen, Board Clerk 4 c d E t U Q it N O d w H N ~ O C ~ O o v d N d s .. O a` Q: E 2 ~ c ~ a~i M 3 ~~.7 .6 ~ Tm a ~ N o U O Y N .n O ~ ~ o E ddC U C < Z M N D N Q• Q v; > i ~ o w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :o ~ a ~ N O < V O O O rn f F Z a 3 ~ Q ~ ~ ~ o ~1 M ~ OMO M '"'di ~ a ui rn a m ~ a ci ~ a ui rn ui rn ui rn c~ a a 0 ~ ~ `~ y rte, ~! C+ V U~ Y yp! Q ~ yg~ Q ~yy O U ~ v W ~ N ~ ~ z zz H ~ ~ < ~ ~ O W ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ^ ~ y ~I ~/ _ ~ Q ~"' m ~ ~ Gi « 41 d ~ ' a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a o .. 'I, ~ U s U U 1 ~ i W FF a ~ ~ ~ b FF a 0 41 E O ~ ~N ~ 0 ~ PE p `~ _7 l H d LL F- d LL. H d lL 1- d t~ h d li F- d LL F- 61 V d 3 0 ~ O1 C s ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ x Q Z ^ N z W Y U H LL O z e h4- W LL W U -~ O H H ~ U W U' x z H H Q Ri W ., W o z U W Q a a r 5 ~ ~ 7 u'1 ~-~ THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 101194-8.h REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CAMNEY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAB, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Camney Lane Length: 0.15 miles. From: the intersection of State Route 1033 (Chestnut Mountain Drive) in a northerly direction 0.15 miles. To: a turn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: March 7, 1969, Deed Book 882, Page 63, recorded March 22, 1994, Deed Book 1282, Page 1893, recorded March 22, 1994, Deed Book 1229, Page 11, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 882, Page 63, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 1319, Page 986, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 1232, Page 1652, recorded November 16, 1993, Deed Book 1449, Page 1806, recorded June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1449, Page 1801, June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1441, Page 839, recorded April 6, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded June 8, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 7, recorded June 8, 1994, and Deed Book 1448, Page 16, recorded June 8, 1994, in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Supervisors John Nays: None A Copy Teste: C:C~c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-8.h adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. W ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors r ~~6 BQ1 68 Iy 3.ti0 4c ti ~ 6.6 .. \_ __ ___ ~n PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY ~V Tarn p/ DESCRIPTION: 1) A section of road extending from the intersection of SR1033 (Chestnut Mountain Drive). The end of state maintenance in a northerly direction 0.15 miles to a turnaround. LENGTH: (1) 0.15 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 28 FEET SERVICE: (1) 4 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CAhLNEY LANE INTO THE.VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPART?~NT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 143:.c. ,~/ 4 1` ~. THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGIILAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLIITION 101194-8.h REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CAMNEY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Camney Lane Length: 0.15 miles. From: the intersection of State Route 1033 (Chestnut Mountain Drive) in a northerly direction 0.15 miles. To: aturn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-W y Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date:~arch 22, 1994, Deed Book: 1282 Page: 1893, ~~~ recorded March 22, 1994, Deed Book 1229, Page 11, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 882, Page 63, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book ~~ ~ ~ 1319, Page 986, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 1232, Page 1652, recorded November 16, 1993, Deed Book 1449, Page 1806, recorded June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1449, Page 1801, June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1441, Page 839, recorded April 6, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded June 8, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 7, recorded June 8, 1994, and Deed Book 1448, Page 16, recorded June 8, 1994, in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke Minnix Nickens Eddy Nays: None A Copy Teste: ~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-8.h adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Camney Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Camney Lane is a private drive in Southeast Roanoke County serving four (4) families. It is the second top priority on the 1994-96 Rural Addition Priority List. Staff has developed plans for the various corrective actions required to bring this road into the State Secondary System. Prior to acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation and the assigning of a state route number, staff has to submit a completed package of information, including a Board Resolution requesting acceptance of this road. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for surveying, engineering, and administrative work on this road was within the yearly roadway activity of the Engineering & Inspections Department's budget. Additional funds may be required to adjust utilities. Road construction funds are available in the accounts administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting the acceptance of Camney Lane into the Secondary Road System. k-8 ITTED BY: i ~ APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, 're for Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & I spections County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 2 ~~ The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 11th day of October, 1994, adopted the following: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to X33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to X33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Camney Lane Length: 0.15 miles. From: the intersection of State Route 1033 (Chestnut Mountain Drive) in a northerly direction 0.15 miles. To: a turn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: March 22, 1994, Deed Book: 1282 Page: 1893, recorded March 22, 1994, Deed Book 1229, Page 11, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 882, Page 63, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 1319, Page 986, recorded June 14, 1994, Deed Book 1232, Page 1652, recorded November 16, 1993, Deed Book 1449, Page 1806, recorded June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1449, Page 1801, June 27, 1994, Deed Book 1441, Page 839, recorded April 6, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1085, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded June 8, 1994, Deed Book 1427, Page 1090, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 25, recorded December 3, 1993, Deed Book 1448, Page 7, recorded June 8, 1994, and Deed Book 1448, Page 16, recorded June 8, 1994, in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to X33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and 3 I<~ $ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4 '3is I ta3:.c. ~/ eon 68 \ 3.60 Ac p ~ ~-' \~ ~ ~~ ~ ~" ~ ~ G6 ~\ 9. s PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY ,~ a~ Town ~/ DESCRIPTION: 1) A section of road extending from the intersection of SR1033 (Chestnut Mountain Drive). The end of state maintenance in a northerly direction 0.15 miles to a turnaround. LENGTH: (1) 0.15 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 28 FEET SERVICE: (1) 4 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CANLNEY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPART!~NT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 -~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 101194-8.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHESTER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Chester Drive Length: 0.08 miles. From: the end of state maintenance in a Southeasterly direction 0.08 miles. To: a turn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: February 22, 1946, Deed Book 2, Page 187, Plat Recorded, Date: April 26, 1947, Deed Book 3, Page 20, Plat Recorded: August 25, 1994, Deed Book 1455, Page 529, Recorded September 27, 1994, Deed Book 1457, Page 1952, Recorded January 25, 1994, Deed Book 1433, Page 1047, in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. BE FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: H. Odell Minnix Seconded By: Not Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson. Kohinke Minnix Nickens Eddy Nays: None A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101194-8.i adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. Mary H: Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~ ~ ''~l - ,»~ ~'~ _ ~~~+°'° ~ `' \ r>>~ ` '~~ ~\ /< ~ '" ~~~ ~' ~ ~'~~ \~, ~ ~ '~ ~ tea' `p01 ~ ~ ~ j ~ 's\ ~ ,~ ~\ '°' t)~~ ASS / ~~~ \ a` .~/ d ~ `. ~ b tP~ t7~ u~ - - S O ` ~n - r• •. _ ~ ~ pay - /` t~s ~A~ ~ fot' I \ •~~` is _ • ~ ~~~ / ~ ode ~ m. 1 ,\ I \.~ ' T~ ~~ ~ f0 ti f• PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) A section of road extending from the end of state maintenance (Route 1857) to a turnaround located at its terminus. LENGTH: (1) 0.08 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 34 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SERVICE: (1) 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CHESTER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPART*~NT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 4 ~~ _ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, IN REGIILAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1994, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 101194-8.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CHESTER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Chester Drive Length: 0.08 miles. From: the end of state maintenance in a Southeasterly direction 0.08 miles. To: a turn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded,_~~t~: Jul 12 1994 Deed Boak.: 1380, Page 1443, Deed Book 1 7-3", Pag~ 413 y, Deed /Book r13 8 0 , Page 14.4-3-- and Deed Book 1215, Pa 1014, recor ed January 24,1994, in the Roanoke County Clerk' Office. r BE FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: H. Odell Minnix None / /r i\ r~` \ \ ~ \\ C. ~ •~ • ~ ~~ L ~. / \ / _ .; reY O b ~ ~ Arr p~ e ~ \ I PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) A section of road extending from the end of state maintenance (Route 1857) to a turnaround located at its terminus. LENGTH ; (1) RIGHT OF WAY : (1) ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) SURFACE WIDTH: (1) SERVICE : (1) 0.08 MILES 50 FEET 34 FEET 30 FEET 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CHESTER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Chester Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~'~~ ~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Chester Drive is a private drive in Northeast Roanoke County serving eight (8) families. It is the top priority on the 1994-96 Rural Addition Priority List. Staff has developed plans for the various corrective actions required to bring this road into the State Secondary System. Prior to acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation and the assigning of a state route number, staff has to submit a completed package of information, including a Board Resolution requesting acceptance of this road. FISCAL IMPACT• Funding for surveying, engineering, and administrative work on this road was within the yearly roadway activity of the Engineering & Inspections Department's budget. Additional funds may be required to adjust utilities. Road construction funds are available in the accounts administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting the acceptance of Chester Drive into the Secondary Road System. APPROVED BY: `~~ Arnold Covey;-}re~tor Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & I spections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 2 ~y The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 11th day of October, 1994, adopted the following: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the street described below was established prior to July 1, 1983, and currently serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to X33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Chester Drive Length: 0.08 miles. From: the end of state maintenance in a Southeasterly direction 0.08 miles. To: a turn-around located at its terminus. Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: July 12, 1994, Deed Book: 1380, Page 1443, Deed Book 1173, Page 413, Deed Book 1380, Page 1443 and Deed Book 1215, Page 1014, recorded January 24, 1994, in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. BE FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to X33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: Vote By: A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of 3 ~ . ~ ++•t a ~ \ i '~ ~~ Ll~j ~ 1 a ~~~- ~ N ~~~ ,\ 1~.~ ~~~ ~ '~ `\ \ ~~/~.^ y `~`/ \ n +' yes' /' / ~\':. } ~„ ~ +ye +A ~/ O ~ ~~ 1j6 1~~ i r + ` ~ 7 O ^ ~ 1+j1 Cues 17t0 . ~ = ~I 4~\~ `, ~~\ ~`;n ~ ~ o . ~ ,~ y poi Ott ~ y ~~ ~ ~a"~ Into \` m etc ~ ~. ^~. ~. o• `~ ` \ ,~ ~ `-~, ,~ ~,at, PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY l,~ \ o.,. :~ tt DESCRIPTION: 1) A section of road extending from the end of state maintenance (Route 1857) to a turnaround located at its terminus. LENGTH: (1) 0.08 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 34 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SERVICE: (1) 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CHESTER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA ENGINEERING & DEPART!~NT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 4 N-I County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Am n Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Unaudited) Balance at October 11, 1994 of General Fund Expenditures 4 64 28 4 646 2 5.4% 5.4% Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). m:\finance\common\board\genera1.95 fV -a2 County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Unaudited) ~ 4 Submittedy by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance m:\finance\common\board\capita1.95 N3 County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway Balance as of October 11, 1994 Submitted by ~~ ~' ~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $90,000 (50,000) (10,000) (1.0001 $29,000 m:\finance\common\boazd\continge.95 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANO E COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Fire and Rescue Response Report - August 1994 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Fire and Rescue Department responded to 138 fires and 424 EMS calls in August 1994. Hollins was the busiest station with 45 fires and 102 EMS calls. Fire reaction times were 2.05 minutes during the day and 2.50 minutes during the night. EMS reaction times were 2.16 minutes during the day and 3.02 during the night. Mt. Pleasant and Bent Mountain Rescue Squads had extended reaction times to one-half their calls. The Chiefs of these organizations have been asked to provide explanation of why this happened and what they plan to do to correct problem. Reaction times increased slightly over the month of July 1994. I will be discussing this with the Fire and Rescue Chiefs at their next meetings. One major incident occurred during the month. This occurred in Vinton and there were four victims located in the fire building. Further investigation revealed the deaths were not the result of the fire. SUBMITTED BY: ~- .,~ ~/ T. Fu Fi e Ch of APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~y N N O M In O N O r M M 00 Il! n ~D r a O 1D M M r r a N M O M m N (D ' In ~ M IO In CD o ~ ~ a N~ N N a ~ I ~O D M M N a In O ~j N O N O r n r (O N n N N n r M a0 ~O n ~ . ~D a r m Q.,.. N ~..; N n O m m r a a /D a l0 M O 'n ~ M O O r N M M a M a O O O o r 0 ~ m m 3` N It1 11/ : Z a N r In tD Ill r N r N N O O M r M r 1D M l0 ~ ui ~ Ili It) O Z Q } ~ In a N n m ~~ M a r' ~ N r 0 N a a 0 M M M ~ N M r O O N o~0' NQ N n O cc a r l r v ui r v r W a ai r eo N v In n r 2 M O Z.. O W n m 1D ao m a In a N lD M M M a r a a0 O u1 m M N r lO N M a O In r n o O a ao N m N r a r a M a N N N O M It) N n r 00 N OD M M r 00 r m ~D N n Q ~ W Z O In a M (O m o0 IA r a N O O O M n ul to N If1 0o M In r r l1) Il7 ~ O r N m M A O to r M a ~ ~ O O (O O Y W to N r N N N O r 00 O 00 m lO Q [[ m U p to Ip m In In O n 1l7 a N N N !O f0 m (D N a M r tll r N a M O O a O O t0 o O NO M m M z W r r N O M M M O N M r n N N a r M 1~ 0 0f m M n p g v tD n N r M e0 In N lp m r O M M m M n N m M In a a M !O N Ilf If1 r eo N ~ N O O N c N O tO f0 0 ~`'~ O O a M N (O 00 a N M ~ M O r 0 ~ ~ f!7 r M N ~ n N m t0 M n l0 n r ~ W C V' J ~ .^ Z a m M O M M N c0 r N a ID M n N M II! n a m O N M m IO M In In r r M a N N In O o ~ ~ r~ E Q r O M a r In v a N N M to ao N a n a m In a m r M In ~ t ~ Z F W ~ ~ d7 Q . - ~ X N O n a In of N M M a a a n n N of N a N N a r a 0 ~ N M r o r n a O O N 0~ O. r r N M a It7 N 0 a In M a r ' N ao n W J ~ O r r O M N l0 O fD m • m Q W 1 U F- oo amcoN amnia rMr Inrm N nIDN r a mmm O O InNa a O M ooloo O aa0m~' O r~ H Z Z Q r r N a O In M N a r M M O r M n Il> O tD M m^ O O ~ ~ ~ w J ~ a V~ O t` Ip N n CO ~D a O a ~ M N t` r r N M N O O a r ^ r M ~ N a ~ ~ a M n of a M 1h O N r I!f o O a N EO m N o r O m Z ~ N N O r l0 N n lG N n ~O n n W O J o . _ Q O O r r N m a M r O O O r fD 10 ~O m m N n n - m n 00 O O M O O r o O O r r a° b r m m r off ~ In In r IA O M ' ! J 3 N O O O N N a In ~ O~ ' Q N Q ~ U W~ 111 cD In t0 r lp I1) N m N r a M r O M 0 a N 00 r r N r m IO ~- a r r r N In ~ N Ill a m a 0 In n In fO a i r O O O a° N O a0 N l0 a` m N } Z .- N r O r ui r t0 N N ID In !0 Q a ~ U ~ Z ~' O mralll nmina 000 ran tDnm aoMlO m ao OOra~' mNao O r V O H r r tl1 M 1n N r r N M O N N a O M C 1- ~' ri ui v .- r m vi oo eo ri ao ~ o _ L ~ O - 7 ~ w to ~ V w ~ ;Z g a ~ ~ ~ N ~~ 5 o[ j ? M v ~ n z w ~ z 2 Z z z ' N ~ ~ u. 2 ~ OwC ~ f3 ~ y T W {µ W m W ,~ ~ Q S v' : , ¢ 11 ~ N 1vl k 1 4 ^J V O F- - ~ ~ O r r- ~ ~ ~ F+ R ~ U a mm ~ W ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ aa~ 'Y ~ ~>> ~~ w rnr~- ~~~ Dary a>I~~o ~~l~~'A~ eL a v r-~acn n ~ d a ~qa I ~-- ~4'~ ~~?- zaz ~o~a W~~~ ' H^ r rwy W a ~ s a _ -°z~~ z z Qaa x ~ 4gz a ua 4o.a a ~ Q~z a ~ aoo ea a. ~ ~m4~~ ~ U x ..r 'q): ~:.ai~ .~ es ~ ~ ~ ~n lu o zu. a v : an~~, xaz rrro~ [ y i oz u~iu~u~i ~d u.a ~t ~~ ~ (~ Q FQ-.:l-fa-F- ,Uq l.~¢z 4 OUd ~ ~CI':6 ~ . ~1 T~ mG76. la:~ O(7y ,:. g 7. S. CL W (3mQ~ ~ f1Ci~~~,, r Q ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ d ~~ ~- ~.-r..r-M oc¢ov z ir zQ z ¢ ¢ z ¢a4 aF- F- WC G L F- Q a w 0 . W G W z O w ~_ Z ~_ I""' U Q NW LL C ~ 7 9 c v c m u L m U ~ A W V N ~ c E u -o c ;: L N m m i~ d £ F ~ E= o o ~ E m d N C O ~ a °' N ~ ~ 0 (t. ~ ~. ~,~ocCamatioh "' PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 231, 1994 AS RED RIBBON WEEK IN SUPPORT OF A DRUG FREE COMMUNl7Y WHEREAS, the Red Ribbon Campaign was initiated in 1985 by the Virginia Federation of Communities for Drug-Free Youth; and WHEREAS, the red ribbon was designated as the symbol of intolerance of illegal drug use and a commitment to a drug-free life style; and WHEREAS, a group of concerned citizens, parents, students, teachers, police officers, business people, judges and other caring individuals have established the Roanoke Area Youth Substance Abuse Coalition (RAYSAC) to bring better coordination and development of substance abuse prevention programs and resources; and WHEREAS, RAYSAC is promoting the Red Ribbon Campaign in the Roanoke Valley through a variety of activities and has asked that the Board of Supervisors recognize Red Ribbon Week in Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia do hereby proclaim October23 through October 31, 1994 as RED RIBBON WEEK in Roanoke County, Virginia, and encourage all of our citizens to join In the observances and activities of this event. Lee B. Eddy, Chairman ATTEST: ~Cie.cg~ ~/• ~„ Mary H. Allen, Clerk ~~ocYamatio~ "-5 PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 9 - 15, 1994 AS ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNITY EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, the Virginia Association for Famity & Community Education (formerty Extension Homemakers Council) was founded In 1923; and !s an organizatfon of volunteers dedicated to strengthening /ndlviduals, families, and communRfes through education and leadership; and WHEREAS, October 9 - 15, 1994, has been officially designated as Virginia Family & Community Education Week by The Honorable George Allen, Governor of Virginia; and WHEREAS, more than 3,500 Family and Community Educators, in conjunction with the VirgJnla Cooperative Extension, serve as leaders and educators 6y conducting special self-help programs which are open to the public within their own communities; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Family & Community Education Council is celebrating this week by sponsoring a workshop on children's television; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Family & Community Education Council wil! hold their annual Achievement Day on Thursday, October 13, 1994, at the Roanoke County Women's Club; and WHEREAS, Virginia Association for Family & Community Education members are also participating in the training in the National Family Community Leadership program which is designed to increase Jnvolvement in public policy decisions; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Association for Family & Community Education, Virginia Cooperative Extension, and the American Association of Retired Persons co-sponsor the Women's Financial Information Program that teaches women and men how to manage their financial affairs with more confidence. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of October 9 - 15, 1994, as ROANOKE COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNl1Y EDUCATION WEEK and call upon all citizens to join with me in supporting the aims, goals, and programs of the Roanoke Valley Family & Community Education Cnunr_il Lee B. Eddy, Chairman ATTEST: `~'~~~ ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk C Q~ICiQ fl t ~5 ~ Q PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1994 AS NATIONAL ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH 1N ROANO/~ COUNTY WHEREAS, the arts and humanities enhance and enrich the lives of all Americans; and WHEREAS, the arts and humanities affect every aspect of life in America today including the economy, social problem solving, job creation, education, creativity, and community liveability; and WHEREAS, local arts agencies across America have joined with the National Assembty of Local Arts Agencies (NALAA), National Assembly of State Arts Agenc/es and a coalition of over fffty national arts and humanities organizations representing over 23,000 cu/iural organizations to form the National Cultural Alliance to develop a multi-year public awareness campaign on the avalla611ity and importance of the humanities and arts to all Americans; and WHEREAS, the campaign and ifs theme, "The Arts and Humanities: There's Something In It For You," was Introduced to the public in the Fall of 1993 and will be ongoing for three years; and WHEREAS, the nation's 23,000 cultural organizations, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the nation's 3,800 local arts agencies, the arts and humanities councils of the 56 states In U.S. jurisdictions, and the President of the United States will be encouraged to participate In this celebration and In the public awareness campaign; and WHEREAS, the month of October, 1994, has been designated as National Art and Humanities Month. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, do hereby proclaim the month of October, 1994, !n Roanoke County, Virginia, as NATIONAL ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH and call upon all citizens to become involved In supporting the °~'p °rfd humanities in our area. ~~. ~~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman ATTEST: .~'~• Q.Q-Le~~..~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk R .~ 1,, ~~ , I j PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING SERVICES THAT RAYMOND R ROBRECHT HAS PROVIDED FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Raymond R. Robrecht served as CommonweaRh Attorney for Roanoke County from 1968 until 1971; and WHEREAS, Raymond R. Robrecht also served from 1972 until 1981 as a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, representing Roanoke Counfy, Craig County, and the City of Salem; and WHEREAS, Raymond R. Robrecht devoted countless hours to serving the citizens of the County of Roanoke during his tenure as Commonwealth Attorney and as Delegate to the General Assembly; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County desires to recognize and extend its gratitude and appreciation to Mr. Robrecht for his dedication and outstanding services. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Lee B. Eddy, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby issue this proclamation recognizing RAYMOND R. ROBRECHT for his many significant contributions to the well being of the citizens of Roanoke County, the Roanoke Valley, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. ./~ Lee B. Eddy, Chairman ATTEST: Mary H. Allen, Clerk ~/- 5 Item No . -~~ --~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETINt3 DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: Financial Statement and Supplementary Schedule (Audit) of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, for Fiscal Year 1993-94 COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR~B COMMENTS: EXECIITIVE BIIMMARY: The Industrial Development Authority (IDA) is required to have an annual audit completed by September 30. H. Schwarz and Company performed the audit and determined that the Authority's operations and changes in its financial position are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The IDA contracted for its own audit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file audit. Respectfully submitted: UUI~-f~ t~vo Timo by W. Gu ala, Secretary-Treasurer, IDA ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Attachment N-~ i H. scx~~z ~ co. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS A Professional Corporation ~~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULE June 30, 1994 n-~ OFFICERS Charles R. Saul, Chairman Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary-Treasurer Edward A. Natt, Legal Counsel BOARD OF DIRECTORS Billy Ii. Branch Ronald M. h~tartin J. RichardCranwell J. Carson Quarles W. Darnall Vinyard Wayne Dunman TABLE OF CONTENTS ty ~'F' Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance Sheet 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 3 Statement of Changes in Financial Position 4 Notes to Financial Statements $ SUPPLEMENTARY SCI`IEDULE Schedule of Revenue Bonds and Notes Outstanding 8 H. ~~C~~1_RZ ~~ CO. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS A Professional Corporation INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Members of the Board of Supervisors and Board of Directors industrial Development Authority Roanoke County, Virginia Nb 5204 Bernard Drive, Suite 300 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 (703) 989.6144 FAX (703) 989-6613 We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, as of Junc 30, 1994, and the related statements of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance and changes in financial position for the year then ended. Tf~ese financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statcmcnts based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statcmcnts referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, at June 30, 1994, and the results of its operations and changes in financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule of revenue bonds and notes outstanding on page 8 is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statcmcnts. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. ~' ~-O" September 26, 1994 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1994 ASSETS Cash Land (Note 3) LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Fund Balance The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part o[' these statements. Nb $ 3,567 1.453.282 $ 1 456 49 $ 11 45 2 N~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Year Ended June 30, 1994 REVENUES Contributions from Roanoke County $ 435,830 Audit fees 754 Member fees 1,350 Application fees 250 TOTAL REVENUES 438.184 EXPENDITURES Service charges 136 Professional fees 950 Directors' fees 850 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1.936 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 436,248 FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR 1 2 1 FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR $ 1 449 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 3 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ViRGIN[A STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION Year Ended June 30, 1994 FINANCIAL RESOURCES WERE PROVIDED BY: Excess of revenues over expenditures Reduction of cash TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE FINANCIAL RESOURCES WERE USED FOR: Purchase oC land N-~ $ 436,248 (66) $ 436,182 $ 436.182 4 N-~ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1. ORGANIZATION, DESCRIPTION OF THE ENTITY AND ITS ACTIVITIES The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, was created as apolitical subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia by ordinance of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on August I I, 1971, pursuant to the provisions of the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act (Chapter 33, Section 15.1-1373, et. seq., of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended). The Authority is governed by seven directors appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. It is authorized to acquire, own, lease and dispose of properties to the end that such activities may promote industry and develop trade by inducing enterprises to locate and remain in Virginia. In addition, the Authority is authorized to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of obtaining and constructing facilities. Liability under the bonds may be retained by the Authority, or it may be assumed by the enterprises for whom facilities are constructed. Collection of revenues pledged to liquidate the bonds may be assigned to a trustee. The revenue bonds are not deemed to constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or any municipality thereof. The bonds are payable solely from revenues generated from the lease of the facilities constructed and may be secured by a decd of trust on those facilities. Note 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES erating Cvcle and Classification of Assets The Authority may realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities in operating cycles which range from very short to very long periods. The accompanying financial statements are presented in a nonclassified format because working capital concepts are not indicative of its operating liquidity. Net Investment in Direct Financin¢ Leases The Authority may acquire and improve properties and retain title to them. Where transfer of title at the completion of a Icasc to a tenant is not reasonably assured by bargain purchase options or other Icasc provisions, the Authority accounts for activities in its role as lessor as either capital leases or operating leases in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard Number 13. Passthrough Financing Leases Most activities of the Authority represent passthrough leases. These agreements provide for periodic rental payments in amounts which are equal to the principal and interest payments due to project bondholders. The Authority has assigned all rights to the rental payments to the trustees of the bondholders, and the lessees have assumed responsibility for all operating costs such as utilities, repairs, and property taxes. In such cases, the Authority neither receives nor disburses funds. 5 [ ~ .~'` INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ii OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Although title to these properties rests with the Authority, bargain purchase options or other lease provisions eliminate any equity interest that would otherwise be retained. Deeds of trust secure outstanding bond obligations, and title will revert to the lessee when the bonds arc fully paid. Although the authority provides a conduit to execute such transactions, it does not retain either the benefits of asset ownership or the liability for bond liquidation. Accordingly, the Authority does not recognize associated assets, liabilities, rental income, or interest expense in its financial statements. Investment Income Recognition Interest income from short-term cash investment of bond proceeds related to projects retained and managed by the authority is restricted as to its disposition by the bond indentures and is deferred as a part of the basis of related properties. Contributions from Local Governments and Deferred Revenue Contributions from local governments are recognized as income of the Authority when the activities for which the contributions were designated have been completed. Note 3. LAND The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, owns certain parcels of sand as follows: • 175.57 acres of land located at Valley TechPark $ 1,017,100 • IS acres of land located at 601 Hollins Road 286,152 • One-half ownership with Botetourt County of 15 acres of land located in the Jack Smith Industrial Park 63,391 • 2 acres of land located on Route 1 1 75,957 • .484 acres of land located on Routes 11 and 460 10,682 $ 1.453.282 Note 4. REVENUE BONDS AND NOTES As of June 30, 1994, the Authority has issued $45,336,225 and has outstanding $28,849,614 in bonds and notes under the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, pursuant to Chapter 33, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. These debt issues are not included in the accompanying financial statements since the Authority is not liable for their repayment, as discussed in Note 2. 6 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ~° OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOTES TO C'INANCIAL STATEMEN"tS Note 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Roanoke County Director of Economic Development serves asSecretary-Treasurer for the Industrial Dcvclopmcnt Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Roanoke County pays legal fees for the industrial Dcvclopmcnt Authority in the normal course of business to the legal counsel of the Authority. Total lets paid for the year ended June 30, 1994, were approximately $12,363. A member of the Industrial Development Authority has been engaged by Roanoke County's contractual engineer to prepare a landscape plan for an industrial park. Total cost is estimated to approximate $5,000. ty H O ~z H Cyi ~ H ~> W O U A p~p~ E~ ~ H ~ O H U z H A H N O W H O z A rn to • O O ~ ~ W ~ y W W ~i Cs. O W A W x U N 11 U N •O W 4-i 0 app H O~ rn O ~ U ~ O r-1 M oci ~ G ti ~ ~ ~ a~ i u ' q U ~ ~ N ~ N J ~ U l.1 ~ ~ •rl ~ N ~ ~ U W N ! 1 1 J •. ~ U •.1 U •.1 •.-1 U S-+ •~ • a cd U bD a •.a b W t~ v G •~ G u u G G • y W VI r-1 4-I (1, W GD 4-1 ,~ •.-1 U .b S-i cd o bD e0 AO p. G b0 hD CU ~d dD G N G G G G G o d •.~ a~ N G G G +-~ G G o a •-+ b •.~ •.+ •.~ •~ y •d v oo •.~ •.~ •a ' a~ •.~ o J~ 'Lj ~ f3 ~d ~ ~ .--1 y d b ~ O ~ W r-1 }-~ TS y ~ W 1 b • d O y U ~ N •.-~ •~ •. b •.a •.a •r1 .~ ~ .• c .C .--~ ~ ~ d G G G G a~ .n o ep ~ G ~ ~ G G ~+ ~ b .-1 y .O .n .n cp Sa G .p .a .p cd .a i~ b0 y O ~d 1.1 '~' td N rl •.-1 •.d y ~ a ~ o v v v v 3 d v~ v v v ~ v v ~ • .et a • + . G c ,-+ v- v a •a a~ •.+ •a •a •a •.a ~+ •a ~ ••~ •~+ ••~ G •~ •~ •~+ d ~ ~ aoy a~ ~,www w G o•dwWwW ww ~ ZHwxfs 3ooo O ~~~w~'ooO C900 dx 0~--~NOOvIO~o.•~~ OO~DOOt~000 70ao ~t OO~MOOo0U1~0.70+OM~01~ ~OOO~OOrn •~-1 O f~ Q~ O O O Vl 1~ ~O to O 00 M O ~O M O O O M O \O ~O ul~t~t000cO~tNO00o00~OMMO~0000M rn ~O Vl V1 .--1 ~ 1~ O N O H M M M f~ ~ e--1 O O M N lf1 if1 7 ~ r-~ ~D .-1 V1 .-1 N ~ O~ ~O N O~ M M M ~D O M M N .--~ 00 N ~ r-1 M M r--1 ~ MI 00~ N 0000000000oooo~nooooo0o u, .-~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O N ~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N •.-~ G 0000000 i1lvl~t0000N0000000 ~O by tq c0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 .--~ a0 N 0 ~'1 O N .-t ~1 ao 0 ~l ~O ~r1 0 M •~ y ^ O ~ ~ N Q~ ~ M .--1 O O ~7 1f1 r-1 to u'1 f~ O ul M N N M L.t H Q vl .--1 N O~ .-1 .--1 ~ r-1 .--1 ~ M .--1 ~ M tIl of v>• .-~ M M ~ ~ ~ ~O o0 ~ 00 M a0 00 00 a0 00 vl vl r~ r~ ~ rn ao rn rn rn rn o. ~n vi o0 00 .-~ r-1 Q\ r-d .--i V1 O~ O~ r1 r-i 00 O~ M ~ f~ - ^ 00 .-~ .-1 ~ W D\ O~ O~ Q\ - O~ - Vl - ~ 00 '•d 1~ 00 O~ - - ~ 00 00 r--1 O~ O+ .-•~ ~ rl rl r-1 N r--1 N N N N r-1 ^ - V1 lfl O\ O~ .--r ~-1 1.1 f-1 Y7 •• L7 3-I S~J S-7 3.1 3.1 S-1 S-1 N O~ .-1 .--1 ~ r-1 .--1 ~ ^ ^ 6 6 f3 H 8 ~ B Cy 6 d .[~ .D .O .c] vl .~ .~ .~ a~ a~ d a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ d m a~ >, o 0 0 0~ d >, u u u 7 u G> u u u u u u u ,-+ t~ ~ u u eo G .-a ~+ s.~ ~-+ o a~ ~ o a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ w ~ v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~d ~d ~d z A ti z A A A A A A A ti O O O O~ '--~ '-7 ~~~ y ~ ~ y O 11 }~ LJ r•~ ~ b U 1.1 N •~ •. O •~ N G y N .C O •n H W Q. U N S-~ O l~ N JJ O J..~ a S-1 N R1 V y y O tll y 1J p., 1~ •.a rl N N U) z N Sa .--1 f.~ U R1 U O •rf J-~ G y' y to O ~d N N iJ O Sa O O y ~d O N N 1•+ C) la cd •rl U O O W Vl .~ a ~ V b N Sa iJ cd ~' 1a S-+ a y Q,' DD .t'. cd U O .~ rl R) ('. •r•1 b i ~. ~ y ~ a N ~ a ~ ~ ~ a ~-+ O N a d ~ b ,- + i c 1 a ~ n - + y 3 o o 0 O ~ x~ so •.~ H G G o0 C z G N O r1 cd H ~ U N V y . 'd , >, w w y ~ d y oG o N ~d ~ c7 d c0 G ~ ~ ~ - X23 ~ G ~ b G y x ~ o ~ .~G y G~~~ y o G i a o ,~ i a G •.~ a~ •.~ •~+ d o w ~ ~ .-a •a a~ oD ,~ G G ~+ ~ U ~ N b td .~ O t0 ~t3 u~+o~+~+a~o ~o•.•+a ooo ~v~+o ~ ~+ o ~ H v w [~ rs: 3 ~~ cn a v u: ~n ~ w w x a v oG ~ N-~v ACTION # ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM• Work session to review proposed standards for design, construction and maintenance of residential Stormwater Management Facilities. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Although this is a much-needed program, it is a signEficant increase in the level of services provided. As such, there are additional costs and potential liabilities that we have not assumed in the past. We cannot absorb this program with the existing staff`' and budget, both of which are already stretched. I prefer to begin the program July 1, 1995, arul include this in the budget for next year. Additional funds may be needed to retrofit older detention ponds that are in poor condition or need of repair. Recommend approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Attached are requirements for Roanoke County to accept Stormwater Management Facilities in single family subdivisions. Staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached requirements, authorize one additional staff person and appropriate $60,000.00. BACKGROUND At the July 20, 1994 work session, County staff reviewed with the Board of Supervisors issues involved with Roanoke County accepting maintenance responsibilities of Stormwater Management Facilities. Since that meeting, there have been several inquires from the Board to bring back a proposed maintenance program. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Attached for your review are requirements for Roanoke County to accept and provide maintenance to proposed and existing Stormwater Management Facilities in single family sub- divisions. Staff envisions this program as an expansion of the current drainage program which will involve the mowing, inspections, insurance cost and general maintenance (debris and silt removal) of these Stormwater Facilities. Since this work is to be contracted out, staff is requesting one additional person (drainage supervisor) to administer the mowing contract, coordinate the inspections and assist the drainage engineer in other drainage projects. a ~i STJNIlKARY OF INFORMATION ( continued) Because Developers or Homeowners Associations may not want to participate in this program, this is a voluntary program. The intent of the program was to establish an enterprise fund where a continual flow of resources would be generated to cover the County's expenses. It should be noted that the County's general fund may have to support this program for several years until a pool of funds can be collected to achieve staff's objective. Funding for the program will be provided by: a) one time maintenance fee paid by the Developer or Homeowners Association and b) yearly special assessment fee placed on the Real Estate Tax Assessment for each lot. This type of funding mechanism would provide a way for Roanoke County to cover any additional cost which might be incurred by new federal and state regulations. In order to implement this program, County staff will have to bring to the Board the following: a) resolution incorporating attached requirements into the drainage standards b) ordinance authorizing the special assessment. Since it is the general consensus that the Stormwater Management Facilities should be viewed as a public utility, the maintenance program was set up to be user-funded. FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that start-up cost would be approximately $60,000.00. This can either be appropriated during the current fiscal year from the unappropriated balance or absorbed during the budget process for FY95-96. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the program as outlined and appropriate $60,000 for staff and associated support (vehicle, radio, etc.) as a part of the budget process. Effective date of program July 1, 1995. 2. Approve the program as outlined, appropriate $60,000 from unappropriated balance and once all legal requirements are met by the County, implement program. ~i ALTERNATIVES (continued) 3. Scale down the program, have County staff provide general maintenance (approximately 10 cutting/year and inspections), the Stormwater Facilities remain the ownership of the Homeowners Association and Board covers all costs (staff, mowing). Estimated cost not able to be determined at this time. 4. Do nothing and leave the ownership and maintenance the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 1. ~UBI~ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ _ ~ ~' ' ~~ Arnold Covey, Direct r Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Ins ections County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Finance ~- i COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DESIGN, CONSTR UCTION AND MAINTENANCE STANDARDS REQUIREMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES IN SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVSIONS I. Purpose ~i The purpose of the County of Roanoke Design and Construction Standards for Detention Ponds is to establish a procedure for requesting the County of Roanoke to accept the responsibility for maintenance of above-ground Detention/Retention Facilities that are located within single family subdivisions. DETENTION BASINS II. Design A. Design of detention basins shall conform to the requirements of the County of Roanoke Drainage Standards (reference Sections 503.02, 503.03, and 505.02). B. The design of the facility and preparation of as-built plans shall be by a Certified Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia. III. Construction A. Site Preparations All topsoil, roots, stumps, organics, construction debris and/or other deleterious material shall be stripped and removed from the site. The exposed subgrade shall then be proof-rolled (prior to the placing of any fill on the site). The proof-rolling shall be performed with loaded dump trucks or other (heavier) rubber-tired vehicles. It shall consist of a minimum of four over-lapping passes of the equipment with the latter two passes at right angles to the previous passes. Any areas which rut, shove, pump or fail to "tighten up" will be undercut and replaced as specified below. Slopes which are steeper than 3 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) shall be benched or stepped prior to placing fill on them. No fill shall be placed on a frozen subgrade. The site will be graded at all times to prevent ponding or surface water in fill areas. B. Fill Material If on-site soil is unavailable or unsuitable for fill, then a borrow source may be utilized. Fill material soils, in general, 1. Shall be compactable. 2. Shall be within an acceptable range of moisture content which is readily controlled. 3. Shall not be highly susceptible to volume change (shrinkage or swell) or settlement. 1 Fill materials containing rocks larger than 6 inches (15.2 cm) shall not be used. The uppermost two feet (61 cm) shall not have any rock larger than 2 inches ( 5 . 1 cm) in diameter. C. Fill Placement The approved fill shall be placed in 8 inch (20 cm) loose lifts. Each lift shall be spread in uniform layers. Fill soil shall be utilized only within a moisture range of +/- 5% of the optimum moisture content. Compaction of the fill shall be performed with approved equipment. Vibratory equipment is generally more efficient on granular fill soils while sheeps foot equipment is more efficient on fine grain soils. Compaction of the layers shall be continuous and uniform. The fill work shall be graded to prevent ponding or infiltration of rainwater into the fill area. D. Where the embankment is in a fill area, the embankment material shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 8" and shall be compacted to a minimum 95 o density in accordance with Section 303 of the Virginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Specifications. 1. Field density tests shall be conducted by an independent soils testing laboratory under the direction of a qualified geotechnical engineer and results of the tests shall be furnished to the County of Roanoke as a condition of acceptance of the facility by the County. 2. Sufficient field density tests, as directed by the geotechnical engineer, shall be performed to determine the degree of compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above requirements shall be reworked and/or recompacted until the required degree of compaction is achieved. E. All disturbed areas shall be covered with 4" of topsoil and seeded in accordance with Sections 602 and 604 of the Virginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Specifications. F. Anti-seep collars shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. G. If the facility is over four feet deep, takes over two hours to drain, or the interior slope exceeds 3 (H) 1 (V) , permanent fencing will be required. Additionally, if the facility is in a congested area or will in any way pose a hazard to the general public, fencing will be required. 1. Fencing shall be a minimum of six feet high, a minimum of standard nine gauge chain link fence with one or more locking double gates (minimum ten feet wide) for access. 2 t~ "{~'.~~ H. The minimum slope of the basin "floor" shall be one percent graded to drain to the principal spillway. IV. Access A. Access to the detention facility shall be provided by means of an ingress/egress easement of a minimum 15 feet in width where the slope of the access road is Oa - 80. 1. Where the slope of the access road is 90 - 180, the access easement shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width. 2. Where the slope of the access road is greater than 180, the access easement shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width. 3. Slopes greater than 18o will be considered acceptable for use as access roads to detention facilities on a case by case basis depending on suitability for providing access of machinery and equipment to the individual facility. B. Access road construction shall conform to the following requirements: 1. Width of road shall be a minimum of 12 feet. 2. Road construction shall consist of 165#/sy asphalt concrete, Type SM-2A on a 6" aggregate base and an adequately compacted sub-base of select material. 3. Proper drainage shall be provided for the access road and any ditches, culverts, drainage easements, etc., shall be shown ont he plans as part of the submittal of the development plans. 4. Access road entrance shall conform to VDOT requirements. V. Bonding & Acceptance of the Facility by Roanoke County A. Detention ponds shall be bonded in accordance with the "Roanoke County Bonding Policy for Subdivision and Site Development." A separate bond for the detention facility will be required and administered apart from the subdivision development bond. B. Acceptance of the detention facility will be considered only after the following criteria have been met: 3 -~ 1. A minimum of 750 of the "Certificates of Occupancy" have been issued for the subdivision and the contributing drainage area to the detention facility has been stabilized in accordance with applicable drainage standards and soil and erosion control requirements. This determination will be made at the request of the developer by the Engineering and Inspections Department on an appropriate status report. 2. All construction and restoration requirements for the detention facility have been completed. 3. All plats and easements have been properly prepared and recorded. 4. Certified as-built plans and copies of compaction tests have been reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Inspections Department. 5. The developer shall warrant the construction of the facility for one year from the date of acceptance by Roanoke County and shall provide acceptable surety in the amount of 500 of the cost of construction of the facility to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the facility. This surety must conform to the requirements of the "Roanoke County Bonding Policy for Subdivision and Site Development." 6. The developer shall pay a maintenance fee to Roanoke County in accordance with the fee schedule attached to these standards. VI. Maintenance Costs In lieu of signing a maintenance agreement with Roanoke County binding the developer/owner or a homeowner's association to the terms of the agreement, the developer/owner has the option of conveying the Stormwater Management Area in fee simple or by Stormwater management easement to the County of Roanoke and paying a one year maintenance fee to the County for any and all future maintenance of the facility beyond the one year warranty period. A. Maintenance costs shall be as outlined below and will be payable to the County of Roanoke as a condition of acceptance by the County. B. Fees shall be assessed as follows: 1. For Wet Ponds (ponds having a permanent pool elevation); 4 a. Insurance b. Yearly Maintenance (Remove debris and cut grass from April to October, estimated to be 14 times per year, 2 hours $75 x 14 = $2100.00.) c. Silt Removal Silt and sediment should be removed every 5 to 15 years, depending on site conditions.($15,000/15 yrs. $1000.00 = per year over the 15 year period.) d. Inspection/Administration (Cost of Drainage Supervisor for inspections and mileage; 3 to 5 inspections per year and average 10 mile trip per facility.) s.. /~ $ 4000.00 2100.00 1000.00 100.00 TOTAL COST ............................$7,200/YR 2. For Dry Ponds (ponds without a permanent pool elevation) a. Insurance $2000.00 b. Yearly Maintenance 2100.00 (same as wet ponds) c. Silt Removal 500.00 Silt and sediment should be removed every 2 to 10 years, depending on site conditions. ($5,000.00/10 yrs. _ $500.00 per year over the ten year period) d. Inspection/Administration 100.00 (same as wet ponds) TOTAL COST ..........................$4,700/YR C. 4. Five percent of the maintenance fee will be placed in an escrow account to cover future costs of the Environmental Protection Agency Stormwater Permitting Requirements or other unanticipated costs. Adjustment of Fees The fee schedule for maintenance of detention ponds may be adjusted annually based on the actual costs incurred during the previous year. These fees may be lowered or raised accordingly and would become effective at the beginning of the new fiscal year. Notification of proposed changes to the fee schedule would be sent to 5 ~- developers, homebuilders, and other interested parties thirty (30) days in advance of any adjustments. The escrow account portion (Section VI. B.4.) will not be included in adjustment of the fee schedule. D. Assessment of Fees After the initial first year maintenance fee is paid, the ongoing cost of maintenance will be assessed to the incorporated lots within the subdivision in accordance with the fee schedule as outlined above. VII Acceptance of Existing Ponds A. Existing detention ponds within single family subdivisions may be accepted for maintenance by Roanoke county based on the following conditions; 1. The requirements for the design, construction, and access, as outlined elsewhere in this standard, have been met and are deemed adequate by Roanoke County. In this case, the facility would be accepted and an assessment made based on the costs to maintain and insure the facility as prescribed elsewhere in this standard. 2. If the requirements for the design, construction, and access, as outlined elsewhere in this standard, have not been met, Roanoke County will advise the applicant of what improvements are needed to become eligible for acceptance. The applicant can choose to make the needed improvements to the facility prior to acceptance by Roanoke County or can request that Roanoke County make the improvements and add the cost of said improvements to the individual lot assessments after acceptance of the facility by Roanoke County. 3. A petition signed by 75% of the property owners within the affected subdivision is presented to the Board of Supervisors. 6 ~_ ) EXAMPLE #1 Junipine Subdivision: Existing Subdivision with 10 residential lots in the Catawba Magisterial District. Lot 11 is the stormwater management facility (detention pond) Dry Pond Maintenance Costs (first year) Insurance...........$2,000.00 Maintenance..........2,100.00 Inspection .............100.00 Silt Removal...........500.00 TOTAL ...............$4,700.00 Maintenance Costs (second & remaining years) $4,700.00/10/12 = $39.17 per lot per month ~~ W~ W Mi r ~ ~o ~~ ~ \ i\ ~ ~: ~e , s` 2 ~ C~ V O ~ ~ ` V t w ~:l lr/r ss) :N iv (Jd07! •: .ttlff~Nb ~ 1 ~1 3 c~ c o~ ~ >yy.~ ! v O t l ~ ~N\ Z 2 e v ~~x c `~ v ~~a i '^ '^ t ~ owl ~o - o. osW .-~~- - ~W_ . W~W . "~~ Q ,°„ _si 2r ,°'.,o~iu W Wooes ~ o~~ ~ < o z C o u ~- ~ 'V x .s ~otV.~ °~ $ •I s _ o -_~ H W ~ z C Y o~c ~~ u~iuu _ t ~uoiel a n 6 ... ! ~ Wr ~~_< ts~ '9/ (!.may no . (r/r,KI Af N ~UdOb Ndfld7 n W 4: ; a o ~~ `$~ o ~1 ~ ~ ~ \ W~\ ~~A : O t ~ ~ . Q ~ N d ~ N W Q f- ~ N C7 ~ FC g Z ~ > ~{y~,,, O~" F~, W a O ~ p1rcu 1~ //~~ LJ.. W F H Q ~ my> ~ ~ ~ O KW ~ ~i° a ~ x vi a m z ~ m oWa Q ~ V O a ¢ U ~ m N H a = a s ~ ~ '^.°..tl oa°~. °; mu oti ~~ s s C S i n y o u > g = ^N~om $ O _ -r~s a~ m a T r ~, I I ~ ;, `i D= ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~'h7A•~y ~`'~~ I i I ~'~~ f ~ 1 ~ L 1 $M~ ~ t. ~ MX/ ' `.i / y a~e v o ~ \ C ` _ ~ ~ tw ~ a~ ~ ~ .. x 1 ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ r ~; r u ~ • ~ : I i I : :. ~y • ~ t 1 t I` ` ~ ~ ~I ` I j l I I - by , il ~ ~ i l ~~ ,. $` I I ! ° h • I ! a l tf ~ a~ ~ I : 'f i ~ ..: ,~I ~ ~' ,f IF I e S I i I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ x ~ ~ I I ~ l l I I' ~ Z f ' f !: I, ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ i I i I f = ~ ~ ` i . i C $° , I i j if, ll w. j ~ o ~~ J s ~o I. li l ' ~iil r ~~ ''' ~ 1 ~ I' - ~ ~ ' ' :1. t' I ~ ~ I I ~~ ~~+ ~ I ~; o I l l I I 1 1 .. _ ~ f 1 l j ~ ,/ ~G- gy p„ ,~ ~ ~ l + f: ,; ' ~ ~. ~ ~ I , I I!i I II.; I '°~. ~' A1~W)KY lNrr0,lM ~y~ ~~~ I I 2~ ~ ~ ! j l i j ; ~ ' I i _ / S ~ I ~ _ ` I I I 'I II l ' ~ j r I _ N I ~ I t l • ~~ ... ' ~ I I t jl I :.I ~ ' ~ ` I ~~~ ~`O~~ ~ ~ .~ I I ; 11 I I ' ~~ j ~//~ ~ ~' ~'~ ~~ O ~ `~ t ! I r I I~ I I' i ~ ~ -~_. ~~' _~ ~ `t ` d k l i ~=Z ~ I I I I I 'I~ 1 ~~ f ' ~ ~ MN `abp~' -~ ...,,~ ~+-=''n~~,~. ! - --.~ ~ ~~.., . ,j ; III i l;- ~~ t-~ t~ a f ~ fi~I ~ ~~ ,.. ~ ~I: . Nb 8~ I ' i• I, 1 h I M I I I l , / M i . II ~ I I ' i I \• g pD ~M q'Y r I wD lwgfn 7pa 71ON M--- ~ "~ ~ ~~ ~ y (. ~ ~~~~ s `~ - ,! I I I~ I f . . . ~ 2 f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r ~ ~ ~ o ~ i J 1 r ~; v ~?~~ ~~ ~ I , j i ~ ~ ~ f? i:~~~ « Q Z y D ~ ~ I I ( I I I :1 ` ~, J ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 1 t ~W ~ :r O L ~ ~ Z I I ,. ~. {~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f a ~ Z i ~ ~ O 'I~ ' ~~ • a f~ ~- / ~ I I J ~ /~ ' ~ I II 'i.. ` t t •,t W I r ~ ~ {j~ ~ I I ~ i a 1 r ~ J r ~ ea tee _ - = - - --- i i a; _~ -- ' ~ ~ ~ 1 ,__-- ~ flw~rrl YNtY1/I ~ I ~ , ! + _ t W ~, u. c ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ I I i }~ S ' ~ W ~ ~~. ~ i-' _ N syM/ /'1>r > 3 4 r f f i Z ~ S ~ i f~a _ NOllN~1~0(r s ~ ! ' ~ ~ n,p /l1~7 Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~o ~ ~ I I ! II ! I i s ~ ~ + \ [i i +. . I f .. ~ ~ . I . 1 ~_ ~ w ~ ~ it ~ 1 ~ 1 i 1 -------'_ Ii ~. , ~ \ -~~ ~ . ~ --- I 1I I ~, •M•N ~ - _ -- I I , a ~ { ~ V ~ I •' '~ / ~.~ r tr I ' ' ~ , ~ i 1 i i I ` I , ~ 1 1 I \ ~ , i - II ~ o ~ W I ~ ~ _ 1 ~_ ~ I i , l I I ~- i EgprIPLE #2 Kingston Court: •n Subdivision with 71 residential lots in the Windsor Exists g Hills Magisterial District y ond) Lot 13.6 is the stormwater management facilit (detention p Dry Pond Maintenance Costs (first year) Insurance....... Maintenance..... Inspection...... Silt Removal.... TOTAL.......... ...$2,000.00 ,...2,100.00 ,,,...100.00 ,,,...500.00 ,,.$4,700.00 Maintenance Costs (second & remaining years) $4,700.00/71/12 = $5.52 Per lot per month ,` 1 ,..~- i P/C 8607-1-1 1• .100• 33 eoe e< b •~~ /- s ~ ~ .so0 9 :e .~. . . xs . `' ,~ e `e ~ 111 i 7 +us / ~ zs u2 6 J~ ` • '~f G 700 COY/la c .. °l(i/rpf . t s { 1 ~ .• / 7s - 133 r S •'fi '> n _ 2 \ n 7'17 e ~ _ ~~~~`` / • Naf • 7 3! f ~ / R % ~•<: a w ~ ~a a .o. ' >. 33 r° • ~ ,;. a •. 13. fT 7 o auf a t i s ~\ P` e 19 ~° • ` :~36 J° • IB 1T 126 a efe) ~\\ t i \ / / t i 4joO ~ ~ • 4 g 20 NrI ,r g 13 r y7 • . gN 16 a• w°mer~°a OB 1~ ,A ff, „ Nrf ' °iN S $ SN eao b6 ~~ f ' ; / / 3 ~ xl P' 2B + t .rN a 1•.30• (4, ~ w 4 ; ' R, ~ Naf : ~ 13 O C~ ~ / •f 11 ; • ~ f ~4 ~~ ' 11 61 ~ ~ 26 fye° e L Nr. g90 ~ f .. ~ 13 O ~ aas \ ,94~ Pza.r nN .r° ; e•~2 ~`' 3as#gy~-b 12 99 ~1.2,~, / ~~se 1 I t y _ ' r •~ " 3 92 ~ - 9.'fr i .fn e '~/ E~ e ~ g +~ ~ °Ji. an:. ~~ ~'/ '° ec ' '' ~ e aO. _q/ up ~ 4 p ' .._ R 10 tti / ar. _ / ° /~ 3S KY Or. `, 1.21 K 31 4q . ~ J` M '<.,, M. rat /= ~ enee 32.1 °t- w,,, ° sop • ~}~ / . O "M 13.1 - / \' •.> wi ~ S ` : 20 f1ar~On ~ i d.~ 16~ •rs„' ••;163 ~ ,/ 1 ~ ~/ IT Aa°, ~s.. / l /// ,~ .. 190 Ia 1: F ~ i / raar ° Q :? ° e u ~ f. ~. < <~I.., i.2 / 29 t ~ ~Ier i ° / i8 3 ~ ~ Ea O e ~e/ (/ ~: u 3/ /• a.+ ~~ _ \ t -i i'~ " ~, -~ F -- ~ `. ~:.., ..o ~ i ~~~{ ' is \~~ fnt ~' ~` O` h / ~ ~ / P ~/ ` \ / \ 2 =~;_- . ( J ~I ~ ftib 5 B ~ /~BS I !Nf ~~ ~':Yrr ~ fltf SDrin~nf : ... f ,f.r ~ ~- 46 ~ 45 fnd ~ ffn 43 I ~uw~nD y =5 36 ~ j NK ' .' ~. lt.0 yy N 3B jam' _ ~ ~ ~/ a I• fta0r 31 ~r .~ >..f .n _~ 27 .. floe 7 Or / \~` 5 / ~ 26 1 / .on \ ~ / /'. )sip ~r.. ' For r^rn9 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ /~ 5 ~ 1 _~ / r~ .•~ °. .. .r // 3 _ ~~ / /~~lr! fY / ./ '.~/ 133 ~ la ~i~ ffr. 12 \ !5n 16 ~`D : fsTl ~~ SS_a< 3.1 d' ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~% V?~ _ .a- Ile. ~ ( _ II ' e \ ~~ '~. \\ 1 \ 5 '..~. 5 101 J 3 10 ',. J1T '. A / \ ` \ • r ~ ~: \ \ ../ . a. ~C _~ DOp .r ~ x .fw ~ \ Ixe< .~ 11~ 1 ~ ' MOa~r a ` rl ~t I~ •r0 1~ 2 .ftf ? 0 / 1 c _~t ,I O - _•, t652 ~ F~ ff 2, 1 --- ... ° ~ .uo _ ~~T 4 ••. \ .f.o \ s~ o¢. r` ~'.\ \ \ .fas .5. \ 9 \\ ~1~v~f •", ~~I i~~ ~ 1 - ia~tt .' E'er 10 \ \ - ~_ ~~~' ~J \'~ O ~ a I usaj_ - usr \ ~/ -- / /~ / - - ~ J .fae 3 s` / / , ~. ,~ ~~~/,~ ~~ a~GE .7 .____ir..u• Ipa ~.t.:( ia"f. ~a .:.t - .col( f. ~c~ .J ~ li r..ao :,Kts.o. ?C.S - ~~ F RO~ORE RVIgOR STRp,TION CENTER SBpE AO G OF TSE BORE OC UN-r 19 9 4 INI gEyD T A REGII NIA .FREE tig$D Y rR OCTOBER 3'1 r EC~TI~ ~ET=NG qA8 NTY. VIRGI ON T 194-9 CERTCODENOF VIRGINIA a Co ty' un REgOLVTSORIN~ITy~ TSE eryisors of Roanok rsuant tO IN COO the Board of Sup ing on this date pu oylslons WI~EREAS - d an executive meet ordance with the pr is has convene to and in acc d iirgln ative recorded vo nformati°n Act, an Code of Virginia an affirm inia Freedom °f I .1344 ' 1 of the isors of Roanoke of The v~rg EREp,S- Section 2 e Board of 5uperv as conducted in ~ ertif i°ation by th cutive meeting w requires a c that such exe Board of Virginia, that the CountY- t with Virginia law•E IT RESOLVED, certif les that, to conforms Y THEREFORE' B Virginia' hereby NOW - fr rs of Roan°ke County' om erviso rs knowledge. lawfully exempted the Sue best of each membe llc business matters a discussed in an lni law wer uti a p es- d th 1 • Only pub is by v irg a of °n p l 1 en res ied meeting requlrem his certif icatlon rs as were identlf d open lye meeting which t bllc business matte ere heard, diseusse execut 2. Only such pu executive meeting w of Roan°ke COUntY- motion convening thard of Supervisors in th onsldered by the B° adopt the Resolution, c o or isor N i.ckens t v irginia• n motion of Superv corded yOte' d O lnnlx- Nlckens- Ed Y the following re b ohinker M and carried Y .visors Johnson, K Supe AYES' TE; None p, COPY TES NAYS : ~'' ~v`~' r isors `~~ Clerk erv Mary H' County Board °f Sup Roanoke ccs EX cutiye Session ... , ~~ ~~ ~~~~#~ ~# ~.~~xx~.o~.C~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL OISTRICT October 1$, 1994 HOWNSMAGI~STERI LODLSNTROIGT H. ODELL'FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. J. Michael Vulgan 5148 Jonathan Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Vulgan: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 11, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as an alternate member of the Community Corrections Resource Board for a one-year term. This term began August 31, 1994, and will expire on August 31, 1995. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, n ..- Lee B. Eddy, Chairma Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LBE/bj h Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Phipps, VASAP ®~y~ Pte, 0~ ROANp~.~ ~ ~ ~ p z c~ ~ z °v a~ 1836 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~ixxtt~ o~ ~~~txt~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 13, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable G. Michael Shelton Mayor, City of Bedford P. O. Drawer 807 Bedford, VA 24523 Dear Mayor Shelton: Attached is a copy of Board Action No. 101194-8.f stating support for locating the National D-Day Memorial in the Roanoke Valley, City of Bedford, or County of Bedford. This action was approved by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: John Robert Slaughter, Chairman National D-Day Memorial Committee 4372 Kirkwood Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 ® Recyded Paper CITY OF BEDFORD AMAIN STREET CITY G. MICHAEL SHELTON MAYOR ~ ~ ~ , P. O. DRAWER 807 215 EAST MAIN STREET BEDFORD, VIRGINIA 24523 October 7, 1994 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 _.-. S ~~~ ~~p~~- ~ Dear Mr. Hodge: June 6, 1994 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the D-Day. We are all aware of the significance of this the localities served by the 116th Infantry, 29th Di` all played a major role in preserving democracy anc PHONE: (703) 586-7101 FAX: (703) 586-7198 ~ ~ ~~ i~Z i~©~" Jam'/~2 /~®/~ ~~ Bedford, Virginia paid a particularly enormous pric le highest per capita loss of soldiers of any locality in major focus during the recent commemorations of «,~ ~,~«~«. «.~ a....u.~ .,....,~„_,. ~,.,..-.,_.. received national and international ceremonies, and was recognized by President Clinton during a nationally televised event at the site of the D-Day invasion on Omaha Beach in Normandy, France. A group has been formed in Roanoke, Virginia known as the National D-Day Memorial Foundation whose goal is to select a site and construct a monument to the memory and honor of all those who were a part of this most famous invasion. The Foundation is currently considering several sites for the location of this memorial to all branches of service. Sites currently under consideration are in Roanoke and Bedford. The Bedford City Council and the Bedford County Board of Supervisors have unanimously adopted the attached resolutions supporting the location of the National D-Day Memorial in the City of Bedford. We are seeking support from other communities in which Companies of the 116th Infantry, 29th Division are located. As Mayor of the City of Bedford, I am requesting your support for the location of the National D- Day Memorial in the City of Bedford based on our offering to the Foundation and our particular place in the history of D-Day. We are very interested in serving as the site for this memorial and your support in this effort will be quite helpful. I will appreciate receiving a copy of any resolution you may consider in support of our quest. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~^ ~ A . ~. ; 'h.~ ~.~ G. Michael Shelton Mayor P.S. Enclosed is a copy of a letter which is being sent to the members of the Board of Directors of the National D-Day Memorial Foundation as a follow-up to our resolution offering sites in Bedford for the location of the memorial. I wanted to provide you this letter for your information and would sincerely appreciate any support you can give us. GMS/df Enclosures RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT LOCATION OF NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL IN THE CITY OF BEDFORD, VIItGINIA WHEREAS, on June 6, 1944, Allied forces embarked on and carried out the greatest land invasion the world has known, which ultimately changed the course of history; and WHEREAS, in June 1994, on the 50th Anniversary of the D-Day Invasion, national and international attention centered on Bedford as the result of its soldiers from Company A, 116th Infantry, 29th Division being in the first wave of the Invasion, and Bedford, Virginia having the solemn distinction of being the community that had the highest per capita loss of lives during the Invasion; and because of this historic event Bedford assisted in changing the history of the world; and Bedford being located between two major metropolitan areas, Roanoke and Lynchburg, with an excellent transportation access system and within aone-day drive of fifty per cent of the population of the United States; and WHEREAS, by and through this distinction Bedford has earned the right to be the site of the National D-Day Memorial because of the deep community interest in its history and in this particular event, and this Memorial will provide a means of continual remembrance and ongoing education about D-Day in the world's history and specifically the role of the 116th Infantry and Bedford's role and impact in this event; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Bedford strongly encourages and supports the location of the National D-Day Memorial to be in Bedford and is willing to commit to providing a significant contribution toward this initiative to be estimated in excess of $250,000. These contributions are to include the donation of the site and improvements such as access and parking, infrastructure to include water, sewer and electric to the site, as well as restroom facilities. As a means to provide for the perpetual care and maintenance of the Memorial and improvements, the City will incorporate the facility into the City's parks and recreation system. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Bedford calls upon all jurisdictions who are a part of the 116th Infantry to become regional partners in this effort and request these same localities to support the location of this memorial in Bedford, Virginia, based upon its historic significance, its central location of those communities who are within the 116th Infantry, and the national and worldwide knowledge of Bedford's role in the D-Day Invasion. It is a suitable, logical location for a monument that honors all branches of the armed forces and specifically those soldiers who were involved in D-Day. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the National D-Day Memorial Foundation and to all governing bodies of jurisdictions which are members of the 116th Infantry. DDAYMEM.RES At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford, Virginia, held at the County Administration Building, thereof on the 26th day of September, 1994: RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT LOCATION OF NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL IN THE CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, on June 6, 1944, Allied forces embarked on and carried out the greatest land invasion the world has known, which ultimately changed the course of history; and WHEREAS, in June 1994, on the 50th Anniversary of the D-Day Invasion, national and international attention centered on the Bedford area as the result of its soldiers from Company A, 116th Infantry, 29th Division being in the first wave of the Invasion, and Bedford, Virginia having the solemn distinction of being the community that had the highest per capita loss of lives during the Invasion; and because of this historic event, the Bedford area assisted in changing the history of the world; and Bedford being located between two major metropolitan areas, Roanoke and Lynchburg, with an excellent transportation access system and within a one~iay drive of fifty per cent of the population of the United States; and WHEREAS, by and through this distinction the Bedford area has earned the right to be the site of the National D-Day Memorial because of the deep community interest in its history and in this particular event, and this Memorial will provide a means of continual remembrance and ongoing education about D- Day in the world's history and specifically the role of the 116th Infantry and Bedford's role and impact in this event; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford strongly encourages and supports the location of the National D-Day Memorial to be in Bedford. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bedford calls upon all jurisdictions who are a part of the 116th Infantry to become regional partners in this effort and request these same locations to support the location of this memorial in Bedford, Virginia, based upon its historic significance, its central location of those communities, who are within the 116th Infantry, and the national and worldwide knowledge of the Bedford area's role in the D-Day Invasion. It is a suitable, logical location for a monument that honors all branches of the armed forces and specifically those soldiers who were involved in D-Day. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the National D-Day Memorial Foundation and to all governing bodies of jurisdictions which are members of the 116th Infantry. Supervisor Boggess made a motion to approve the resolution. Adopted. A Copy-Taste: Wi1J~'am C. Rolfe County Administrator resl\ddaymem s, site which already have restrooms. Restroom facilities specific to each site will be made available as part of our commitment. 12. MEDICAL FACILITIES: Bedford County Memorial Hospital, an affiliate of Carillon Health Systems, is a full service medical facility within the City limits. Further, we have rapid response emergency medical services through the Bedford Lifesaving Crew with fully trained EMTs, cardiac technicians, and emergency response personnel. All of our police officers are trained and certified in response to medical emergencies. 13. LODGING and RESTAURANTS: In and around the City of Bedford there are in excess of 200 rooms for overnight lodging. This includes 62 rooms at the very popular Peaks of Otter Lodge. There are approximately 40 restaurants in and around the City of Bedford providing a wide range of cuisines. If the Foundation is concerned with the regional nature of this memorial site, Bedford serves as the most logical location due to it being in the middle between the two major metropolitan areas of Roanoke and Lynchburg. The lodging facilities and restaurants in those areas, along with those in Bedford, are more than sufficient to meet the needs of visitors to the area. Lodging and restaurants are very minimal concerns in selecting a site if a regional concern is part of the decision making process. The Lynchburg area should not be overlooked in the selection of a site. Bedford provides a location to draw on both major cities which will provide for regional economic impact. 14. TRANSPORTATION: Bedford is within a 30 to 40 minute drive of both Roanoke and Lynchburg. We are served by both the Roanoke Regional and Lynchburg Regional airports. Passenger rail transportation is available in Lynchburg. We are served by U.S. Route 460, U.S. Route 221, Routes 43 and 122, and the heavily-travelled Blue Ridge Parkway. Bedford is within aone-day drive of 50% of the population of the United States. Any site proposed in Bedford is easily accessible from Route 460. Again, if we are concerned with a regional concept, Bedford is uniquely positioned to serve the Roanoke and Lynchburg markets and, in both, major transportation modes are available and accessible. Transportation is a minimal concern when considering the total scope of what we hope to accomplish in selecting a site for a National D-Day Memorial monument. 15. OTHER ITEMS OF HISTORIC INTEREST NEARBY: In terms of history, Bedford has the historical story to tell as it relates to D-Day. As a result, regardless of where the monument is located, people will continue to come to Bedford when they are interested in World War II history. We have experienced this for at least the past 40 years. The City has historical sites in the 1830's home "Avenel", the Bedford City/County Museum, the Downtown Historic District, historic cemeteries, and we are further known for ourwell-preserved and beautiful 19th century homes. Close by are Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest, the New London Academy, the James River Canal locks, the Blue Ridge Parkway with many historic sites, such as the Johnson Farm. Other attractions are Smith Mountain Lake, Liberty Lake Park, Smith Mountain Lake State Park, Holy Land U.S.A., the Beale Treasure story, and many others. Obviously, from a regional standpoint, the attractions in Roanoke, Lynchburg, and the surrounding counties provide for many activities for those visiting the area. 16. GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SUPPORT: There is unanimous support from the Bedford City Council and the Bedford County Board of Supervisors as witnessed by the resolutions that were adopted. The City's quick and thoughtful commitment to this project is further evidence of the local government support. We are offering attractive and suitable sites that lend dignity, solemnity, and historical significance to this effort. We are offering sites that are void of commercialism, that lend themselves towards the educational aspects of what this memorial should reflect, and that are located where the highest per capita loss of soldiers occurred of anywhere in the United States. 17. FUTURE EXPANSION: The Elementary School hillside site provides approximately 20 acres, which is ample for any future expansion of the memorial. No other site proposed offers the acreage that is within the hillside site. The City of Bedford is open to any needs for expansion in the future. The other two sites in Bedford also lend themselves to expansion, depending upon the original and future designs for the sites. o~ aoaroo~.~ z ~ ~ 2 a~ i 8 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~a~xx~t~ ~f ~.o~txt~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 13, 1994 ~j BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL OISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Ms. Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Ms. Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Mr. Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Mr. Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator Dear Ms. Parker, Ms. Ross, Mr. Jones and Mr. Burgess: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution 101194-1 approving and authorizing the execution of the Regional Sewage Treatment Contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke with the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Botetourt, and the Town of Vinton. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 11,.1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ ~~`~- - Mary H. Allen, CMC - Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh _ Attachment cc: Gary Robertson, Director, Utility - Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~~.~~_; ~~',::' _ ~_ ~r ® R~LyoNd P ~x.~ OF ROANp~~ ~ ,; A 2 L7 z J . , +`a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 12, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Keith Martin American Shows 3204 Williamson Road, N.W. Roanoke, Va 24012 Dear Mr. Martin: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101194-8.b supporting the efforts of the American Shows for a National "Green Day". This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ..~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Ann Masters, Clean Valley Council C~.~ixx~#~ ~~ ~~~xx~~~e ® Recycled paper O~ ROANp~~ G t` A Z ~ 7 J r aZ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 12, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. James D. Campbell Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20 Richmond, VA 23219-1901 Dear Mr. Campbell: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101194-8.c supporting the adoption of Constitutional Amendment 2 to bring Virginia's voter registration into compliance with new federal laws. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, C, t'-C.C-Q.~c~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Elizabeth Leah, Roanoke County Registrar C~o~~txt#g o~~ ~..v~~t~n~.e J ®R~yaad Paper O~ AOANp~.~ ~, . ~ z ~ J ` a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 12, 1994 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. C. Michael Thacker Hydro Reservoir Superintendent Appalachian Power Company P. O. Box 2021 Roanoke, VA 24022-2121 Dear Mr. Thacker: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101194-8.e endorsing Appalachian Power's application to the Department of Game and Inland Fishers for boating restrictions upstream of the Niagara Dam on the Roanoke River. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 11, 1994. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Safety Officer, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Box 11104, Richmond, VA 23230-1104 (~o~~x~#g of ~.o~~xxto~.e ;l ®R~yaaa P~ o~ aonN ,~~ • .~ Z ~, ., . v a COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~.aixx~#~ .~# ~..a~xz~~~.e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 12, 1994 Mr. Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr. 4169 Woodridge Drive, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Art: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY. CHAt11MAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTOMALOIST111CT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.. VIDE-CMAl111iMN CATAWBA MAaltTppALplt'R~R,T 80t L JOFYliDN HOLLWS MAOIfTOlIALOItifCT H. ODELL'FUa1r MINNp( CAVE SPRING MAOItT~MALO1iT111CT HAR11Y C. NI~aNs VINTON MAOI{T~pALO1StIbCT (7oa~ 7M-2oos I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 11, 1994, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission to complete the unexpired four-year term of Supervisor Minnix. This term will expire on February 10, 1995. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered 'or to your participation on this Commission. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to-have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke .Y.-~ County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very ruly yours, ~~~ ~ -~~~ Lee B. Eddy, Chai =_- Roanoke County Board of Supervisors f LBE/bjh - Enclosures cc: Steven A. McGraw, Clerk of Circuit Court (By Fax) ~_"_ Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Dir., Roanoke Regional Airport Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council ~- ~- xt ~ m 'n. ,`may' ®1Mq~d~d P~pu t:, Yti ~ .,f"+ .. ~ t . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED BOND FINANCING BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds (the "Bonds") of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $3,200,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on October 11, 1994. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 3:00 o'clock p.m. on October 11, 1994, before the Board of Supervisors in the Board Meeting Room, Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire Roanoke County Attorney Please run this ad: Tuesday, September 27, 1994 Tuesday, October 4, 1994 (~°~y~ ~~;5~ ~, Please send bill to: Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Tr~n:tru~r.u~~ t7y~ tiultt 1000.1199 North P'airfnx Slnel Alexaadrl~, YA 12314.1x37 The alaavtrio tSitlldtaA <la~ North Cbarlen Serert Rullimu~r. Mll 112x1 7701 Coatt Square. flwhliae lbst Ottke An: t2$$ Ctiurlac[onllle, YA 22402-17,ttl1 7~fi0 (:nrentl,nrn 11rin Spite 9W, 71~sons Corner '1irl.ern, VA XL1U1-3ii92 BY TELECOpY M~GL?1RE~10Qt~ One Jarttcv Center 9Q1 ]last Csrr 5tl~et KlrhtltOnd. ~'irgilda 23Z14.4tt'IU 1'honc: (804) 775.1000 (Yrikt:/'t'i)t[1) ra>;: (804) 775-lOtil Direct Dlal: tNU47 775.7'73 w~rid 'Il~taic Cenkr Suitt 90011, 101 XEa Attire 91rtrt lvorw,h, ~~ z.~aloalss TLe Arnn ai~t Nary Cluh Buiidln¢ 1627 F,yc!ittitt, N.1ti. K'81hit~toa, D1: 2000h.40R7 2S1 Arrsu,n i.~r~wr,l3le. bl 1(150 Bt awl,, $el8ium At•tClII-an lltot 49311 tRrhrl-af•Iru~ ! 807.2 Ztvlch.5nltxctimd ~C~JLCmber 16, 1994 Ms . Dian: n . Ilya! L 1]i ret~tor of Finance Roanokf5 C:a~ent.y P.Q. Box 2y0Uo 3738 Rrambletotl 1lvenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24b78-fl798 Virginia PuY~] .tc Sc:llool Ruthority Fall ] 994 Issue !)ear M~ _ Hyatt : Per my canvl=_ryat.il_~rt wilt! Penny Hodge, enclclsed is a form of notice of public hearing tc~ l-le? i}tiblished once a week for two weeks in a newspaper csf gtarleral circulation in the County of Rnanbkt~, Virginia in connection wi Ltl the C'ounty's issuance of general obligation sallool bottdl; in the amount of $3, 200, 000 . The publiaati~tls sllc.~uld occur on September 27, 199 and on Qc~tcsk~er 2, 1y9~1. I understand t.1~~,L tFe Bpard of Supervisors will meet on OctohPr 1 1 , 1994. Thet;e dates wil_ mepC the requirement:; - r~L the Virginia Cacl~, g-inr.P lltN p~.bl.ic hearing must take place n.o leis than 6 dayq alter the second pLbl_c_at'.an. Plcasc rrvir-_w t..}7i~ Loan o~ notice as to arnnllnt, Lime, t9a.te artd place of public ricariny. ALler it has been published, please send us i3n ai-fidavil_ Uf publication_ I will be calling you this afternoon to make 9U2-E? the>µ dxtee are right. Ve/fry t~r/u/ly you r--'q~yyL,/~~~ddN `/!/ G~nthia L. Hendren T.egal Assistant I~° ~1 v ED KOHINKE 6913 Bradshaw Road Salem, Virginia 24153 (703) 384-8013 (FAX OR VOCE) To: Elmer Hodge Subject: Agenda Item D-2 for 9/27/94 September 28, 1994 I am glad that this item was deferred. While I would have supported the acceptance of the grant, I would have felt very uncomfortable with the resolution of appreciation for the following reasons: 1. I think a formal resolution of appreciation, presented in public, is "over kill" for a grant award that is our money in the first place (i.e. taxpayer dollars). 2. Such recognition given in the heat of an opposed campaign adds to the lop-sided advantage of an incumbent. 3. Such recognition at this time could have been perceived by the public as a Roanoke County Board of Supervisors endorsement of the candidate if it had been aired in the media ("One picture is worth a thousand words, no matter what the text of the article reads", Ed Kohinke, 1994). My feelings on this are strictly non-partisan, i.e., I would feel equally uncomfortable doing something like this for a member of my own party. My recommendation: Let's go ahead and accept the grant at an appropriate time, and if there is still a strong desire to recognize Mr. Boucher, let's do it after the election. Another suggestion: Maybe we could get by (since the grant is relatively small) with a simple letter of appreciation sent to him on our behalf by Mr. Eddy. EGK/bjh cc: Members, Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney Tim Gubala ECH: I think this should probably be a resolution on the Consent Agenda. They are trying to make GREEN DAY a nation effort. If you want, I'll add to the October 11 agenda. There is no date that they are requesting this endorsement. Mary Allen ~ ~~ 9/22/94 , '°'z~, John: At the August 23 Board meeting, the Board approved your new surplus property policy, but requested that you bring it back for formal adoption. Do you want to place this on the September 13 agenda or the September 27 agenda? Also, do you want to do it by resolution? If so, should PMM do the resolution? Let me know. ~ ,~ G~ _ ~o ~~ ~/ ~- /. Mary Allen ~"-~~~ l~ 9/6/94 ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ 7 ~~ A~,enda Items for 10/11/94 Second Readings: (1) Quitclaim -Fox Ridge Road (2) Pinkard Court Drainage Easement -Roderic Moore (3) Vacation of unimproved portion of Creek Circle First Readings: (1) Acquisition of property from Salem Stone Corporation for Dixie Caverns Cleanup (2) Vacation of easement -Homewood Circle (3) APCO easement -Hills of Spring Grove (4) Fire Code Ordinance amendments (4) Peoples well lot Consent Agenda: (1) Donation of a water line easement at Chateau Mont Condominiums to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Two ordinances for Salem Cable V ~":' :22:::2::::: O N 00 cf N to Ilf O N O E M O O n (0 O (a M or' d' N r Q1OM 01 N f0 tn M t0. to 00 ~ t0 Met N N~ o '~~NN LY~«'.:«:><»:>:~:; O t0MNt0 M N ~~~ OnjNO PMT ~~ N M 00 O <O I~ ID ~ ~ 01 ~~ :Q Y::~:l:~:Y22~:~ N N O ~ t0 N P N P ~ :~~i;i;i;i;i': .................. ~:~:~:~:~:~::~~:~:~:~:~:~ . . ..:::.>::>::::::: N P O T M .- ~~ t0 '~1 f0 M 1D 1p (O 00 M ~ n M N M - n O M [ M ~f O O O ~ ~ O ~ W M N In tf1 a y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~~ fD 10 ~ N r O M ~ ~ M O O . t ~ :~~1.:>: : Irw: : N N O r M <O M t0 r t1Y to l0 In O ~~'7':~:iR!~:~:4 .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. ~'i:::;:;.:~:~:~':~:~: lD ~ N P M t0 1~ M~ ~ ~- N r 00 t} d' 00 00 M M W N to M O O N o N N P o ~::::'::::::: lff 119 a; r M r O N ~ O M M N N ~- O C O ~Ell:~:~:::~:~:~:~':~:~ ~ ~vj .- r 00 N !h t!1 1~ d' O r r ~ ~ s><»>> ca>>>>> .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. ................... ~:~'3'~Z"`?:`' 00 00 P T O O W E X11 ~ N 10 M M M ~~ <O In 00 M !O N M t!1 o n o O N W o ::; 5 :~ ~ N :> :::d'~ > N N N O N P r 00 N 00 M M 00 ~ M <O n ~.: ' 3 i ~ is is is is i: . . : >::>a::>::>::>::: >~<>< ~~ M (O M 00 ~ ~~ O O O M P S ll"1 OO M ~~~ e- N W ~ ~ M o O O l0 0 O .. ~. :: 1D N N N lD N ~ r' D O M 0 0 O M ~i [2~:^; t[E3 ~:~::~::a:~»;>;:~::~::~: O In fD Q1 ~ 1n t!1 I~ O 'd N r N N !O ~D Q1 t0 M r L{7 ~ '' M O O t0 ~ N M M 0 .. `'"'"'"'"`°"'' ~ N O M N M N N N~ ~ N O O ~ O O M ~ ~ :::~i::::::' .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. ................... .................. ................... <D I~ N '- M O O N to M A O M M 00 P N 00 ~ M t0 r 00 N O O N E t0 t0 ~ o :>;::`::?::'~''~:~#:~ d' M N t0 00 ~ N M O M O H M O M~ ~t N~ t[1 to N N O M 1D O ~Fwr ~ ~ ~ M N r P !V 00 ~~ M P (G P ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~"'~~ ~ W M O M M N ~ ~ ~ ~ <O N~ lD M P N 1~ et 01 M M l0 " ~ ~ M o N O O o ' ''''''' ~ ~ O M ~ ~ N M N st M 1n O N 1 M~ u N M ~ O O 'y:r?~i;~::i lLi d' d' N l0 00 I~ ~ M lD ~ M N e- (p M ~ 'F:::h~i::::::::::: r r r ~ii::_~ il ~:~:~:~:~:~ ~ + ~~::~:~:~:~:~:~::::< ~ <D 1~ ~ r IA In N M M of et tl' P P N lp N N ~~ N Q1 M l0 ~ P o O O d' 3~ .....~...... r r N M ~ lD N 0 Cr ~ M~ ~~ N r~ O LL] N ~ O ~ N O ............. O r r O M N t0 O t0 .- 01 ItI 00 P 00 ~';I'Si Q ................... .................. ................... .................. ~'~'~'~~>~!' '~5:~:~:~:~:~: ~~~~ 00 ~ !D (O N [t M M d' ~ M r LLY ~- 01 1~ (O N M 01 t0 In N ~ 0 O O ~O ~ 0 ~ 00 (0 0 . ''' r ~ N O lD M M N ~ ~ CC O O tl' O M O O •- O IA ~ '- O M P ~i 0 !O M M A O 00 I~i;i~:~ ~i': ID '< 2~ 3334i C ~jJ `!~iil:i~'i~i~i~3 ;:;:;:;:;~;:;`:;%~~~:::: O 1~ to N n n l0 tD P 07 M fG t0 11f P ~ ~ M r In r P IA of N ~ to o 00 01 N CO !D er O d' t[> M '- .- N M N ~ O at U1 e! O E M M M O O 'd' N ~ O M ~~A~'i::~:~f:~:~:~:2~:~:~ : : :~>: ~~ ~ N N O ~ <O N P t0 N P t0 P 1~ 00 O r . :wr~>:~>:a:a> > 2r::%``::<:<:: .................. . ~.'~~':~:~:~;~:~:z~:z~: ~ t0 fD ~ ~ N M d' M ~ O O O ~ t0 t0 (D Q1 Q1 tp P P Q1 P 00 O O ~ o lD ~ ~ o :~: ~~3`':~ : ~ ~ O ~rj O ~ ~ t0 O M r O O M O ~ •- T +y~~ N O O N N to ~~ ~ !D L11 ~> c:~::>:<:<:«:<: ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~. /~ ~ ~y~. ~ ,;,,: ~ 7 ~ l11 t0 t!1 t0 r r ~ ~ M ~ N 00 r W lf> r r N to ~ M n ~ O O O ~ ~ O N O 3° ~:/ : :` L1;1:>:. ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ f0 ~n N Q1 N r O M O ~ ~ N .- e} r Il> ~ ID B O O ~l ~ ~ N O 01 N : ': ' : : ~~:::..:iiii2: : ~ : ~ N ~ O r 11f r ~p In N f0 In (0 ~a«`:::~ ::~i:~:~>:~::~ : (0 T ~ ~ 1[1 1~ Q1 In ~ O O O r a} 1~ (0 I~ 00 00 M l0 00 ~ OD O O ~ o T ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ tp t!1 to N ~ ~ N M O N N CF O O e- t0 :~:wa::...:::>:;::: : M to ~ ~ r (O M 00 (0 M 00 N O N Cw G f Z Cw G Q w 0 U w Z Q Mw L.L C 7 O d G A a N O d C N 7 ~ C ~p O d V t d V ~ ~ ~ N j C ._ e