Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/24/1995 - Regular M V.II~.t~~~ II~ ~.IIc~CYIII~tE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 24, 1995 IQAf70 M ~1f f~Q Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to partfcipate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ROLL CALL AT 3:05 P.M. HCN ABSENT 2. Invocation: H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. i B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS CHAIR APOLOGIZED FOR PROCEDURAL ERROR AT 1/10/95 MEETING AND STATED THAT RULES -SET AT 1/3/95 ORG. MEETING WOULD BE FOLLOWED IN FUTURE BL.T ASKED FOR BRIEFING ON BPOL HEARIIVG TOMORROW. CONSENSUS OF BOARD FOR DDH AND ECH TO REPORT AFTER BOARD INQUIRIES. ECH ADVISED THAT WILLIS BUCHANAN, FIRE & RESCUE, DIED YESTERDAY. FUNERAL FRI MORNING AND DONATIONS TO HOLLINS FIRE & RESCUE IN LIEU OF FLOWERS ECH ADDED E ~ ~ SESSION (51 TO DISCUSS LOCATION OF A PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS OR IlVDUSTRY, AND ~6) INVESTMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS WHERE COMPETITION OR BARGAINING IS INVOLVED DCM INTRODUCED BILL RAND,, GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. BRIEFING 1. Presentation on Greenways. (Bob Fetzer, Board Member, Valley Beautiful) SLIDE PRESENTATION MADE BY BOB FETZER, AND 7.TER DAMS, HILL STUDIOS BOARD DIRECTED ECH TO STUDY REQUEST FOR REGIONAL GREENWAY SYSTEM AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Addendum to the 1979 Water contract with the City of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-12495-1 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for Action Opposing Federal Cuts to TAP and Federal Community Services Block Grant Program. (Elizabeth Stokes, County Representative, TAP Board of Directors) A-12495-2 EGK MOTION TO SEND LETTERS AS REQUESTED TO GOV. ALLEN AND CONC. GOODLAITE~ AND DRAFT RESOLUTION FOR 2/14/95 BOARD MEETING URC WITH HCN ABSENT F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR 2/28/95 URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. Ordinance to Rezone a portion of 1.242 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Expand the Existing Building, Located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Joseph A. 3 Quesenberry. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Broadcast Tower Atop Read Mountain Approximately .4 Mile North of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Virginia Towers Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 7.17 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Construct a Townhome Project, Located Northwest of the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Wimmer Real Estate Network Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of Certain Parcels of Real Estate Located in the City of Salem (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) and Known as the Old County School Board Offices and Annex Located at 510 and 526 College Avenue, Salem, VA. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) FM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 2/14/95 URC WITH HCN ABSENT CONSENSUS OF BOARD TO ADVERTISE SALE IN PAPER, DEADLINE FOR OFFERS 2/10/95 J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Property Owned by the Board of Supervisors Near Spring Hollow for the Water Treatment Facility. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-3 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 4 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Roanoke County's Interest in Certain Real Estate (Regional Sanitary Landfill) to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, Subjecting Said Property to Certain Protective Covenants, and Certain Other Provisions. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-4 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 3. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement from Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt in Connection with the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-5 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement from Honeywood Associates in Connection with the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-6 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Roanoke Regional Airport Commission FM NOMINATED ART WHITTAKER FOR ANOTHER FOUR-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE 2/10/99 2. Southwest Development Financing, Inc. 5 BIT NOMINATED TWG TO ANOTHER TWO-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE A-12495-7 BI;T MOTION TO ADD ABOVE NOMINATIONS TO CONSENT AGENDA AT NEXT MEETING URC WITH HCN ABSENT L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN TIC FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 0-12495-8 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. Approval of Minutes for January 3, 1995. 2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit and 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 from the Cave Spring Knights Booster Club. A-12495-8.a 3. Request for Appropriation of $'7,236 to School Operating Budget for Purchase of Electronic Reference Materials for Secondary School Library Media Centers. A-12495-8.b 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Huntridge, Section 3. A-12495-8.c M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD Supervisor Eddy: (1) Asked for status report on police traffic unit. ECH will bring report to 2/14/95 meeting. ~2) Asked for resuonse to memo suggesting formation of regional Commission on Organ and Tissue 6 Donation and Transplantation as established in Fairfaz County. ECH and FM indicated they would be interested also. ECH will check with Dr. Rutledge and bring back report to 2/14/95 meeting. N. CITIZENS' COIVIlVIENTS AND COI~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE O. REPORTS EGK MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FOLLOWING REPORTS A)±'rER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 1 UW WITH HCN ABSENT 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -December, 1994 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of December 31, 1994 6. Summary of County Ridership and Costs for Valley Metro 7. Bond Project Status Report 8. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of December 31, 1994 9. Proclamations Signed by Chairman 10. Second Quarter Report of Claim Activity for the Self- Insurance Program. P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS NONE BRIEFING DDH briefed the Board on letter dated 1/20/95 from Governor Allen about legislation to phase out BPOL taz over five „year period. FM advised that he will be attending public hearing on BPOL in Richmond tomorrow. Q. WORK SESSION (5:00 PM -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session with School Board and School Personnel on Structure of Teachers' Salary Scale. HELD AT 5 P.M. AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 11 FRANK THOMAS CALLED SCHOOL BOARD TO ORDER DR GORDON PRESENT. (2) DR HARDY DISCUSSED AVERAGE SALARY COMPUTATIONS AND PIER ADJUSTMENT FOR SALARY SCALES 1992-95. (3) MS. ALLYN 1~~IITCHELL, MEMBER OF RCEA SALARY CONIlVIITTEE, MADE PRESENTATION CONCERNING .SALARY SCALES AND INEQUITIES. R E ~ ~ SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) TO DISCUSS LOCATION OF A PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS OR INDUSTRY, AND (61 INVESTMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS WHERE COMPETITION OR BARGAINING IS INVOLVED BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 4:15 P.M. URC WITH HCN ABSENT S. CERTIFICATION OF E ~ ~ SESSION R-12495-9 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT RESO AT 5:00 P.M. - URC WITH HCN ABSENT a EVENING SESSION RECONVENED AT 7:05 P.M. WITH HCN ABSENT T. BRIEFINGS 1. Draper Aden Associates Report on Utility Rates. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) BRIEFING BY GARY ROBERTSON DRAPER ADEN REPRESENTATIVE UNABLE TO ATTEND U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to Amend Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 22, Water, and Section 18-168, Schedule of Charges of Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, of the Roanoke County Code. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-12495-10 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: BLJ, EGIK, FM NAYS: LBE ABSENT: HCN 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of An Existing 15-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and Acceptance of a Relocated Portion of the Same Easement Across Lot 9, Box 6, Plat of One Oak Road. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-12495-11 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 9 3. Ordinance Vacating and Closing an Unimproved Section of Old Road Lying Between Properties Owned by Stranna Arthur, Et Als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1- 11), and Extending in a Northeasterly Direction through Property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1- 10) to the Existing Ogden Road. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-12 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 4. Ordinance Vacating and Closing a 0.220 Acre Strip of Unused and Unimproved Public Right-of--Way Bounded on the East Side by the Existing Right-of--Way for Ogden Road (Route 681) and Bounded on the West Side by a Parcel of Land Known as the Ogden Center Property (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) and to Authorize Sale of Said Parcel as Part of the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-12495-13 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 5. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-12495-14 .................... LBE MOTION TO D~~' SPECIAL USE PERMIT URC WITH HCN ABSENT FOUR CITIZENS SPOKE 6. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct io and Operate a Police Outdoor Firearms Training Range, Located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Police Department. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-12495-15 EGK MOTION TO GRANT SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH CONDITION THAT USE BE LIIVIITED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENTS OF COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND CITY OF ROANOKE URC WITH HCN ABSENT V. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS KEVIN ORCUTT, 2759 HII.LBROOK DR, QUESTIONED WHY PROFFERS FOR PEDIATRICS ASSOCIATES REZONING WERE NOT BEING ENFORCED: POWER LINES NOT BEING UNDERGROUND. DUMPSTER NOT SCREENED. HIGH LIGHTING. NO FENCE ON wALL. BOARD DIRECTED THAT ECH AND STAFF MEET WITH MR ORCUTT TO ADDRESS HIS CONCERNS. W. ADJOURNMENT BLJ MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 8:25 P.M. TO 12 NOON ON JANUARY 31, 1995, AT VIIVTON WAR MEMORIAL FOR MEETING WITH VIlVTON TOWN COUNCIL URC WITH HCN ABSENT 11 ~ P ~N ~. C~~ar~xxt~ ~~ ~.Q~YY~.II~tE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 24, 1995 ,cus s ne ~ ma Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Boani of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (TOCI) 772-200 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i Quesenberry. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Broadcast Tower Atop Read Mountain Approximately .4 Mile North of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Virginia Towers Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 7.17 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Construct a Townhome Project, Located Northwest of the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Wimmer Real Estate Network Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of Certain Parcels of Real Estate Located in the City of Salem (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) and Known as the Old County School Board Offices and Annex Located at 510 and 526 College Avenue, Salem, VA. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Property Owned by the Board of Supervisors Near Spring Hollow for the Water Treatment Facility. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Roanoke County's Interest in Certain Real Estate (Regional Sanitary Landfill) to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, Subjecting Said Property to Certain Protective Covenants, and Certain Other Provisions. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3 M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' CO11~Il1~~NTS AND CONiMiJNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -December, 1994 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of December 31, 1994 6. Summary of County Ridership and Costs for Valley Metro 7. Bond Project Status Report 8. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of December 31, 1994 9. Proclamations Signed by Chairman 10. Second Quarter Report of Claim Activity for the Self- Insurance Program. P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. WORg SESSION (5:00 PM -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 5 11), and Extending in a Northeasterly Direction through Property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1- 10) to the Existing Ogden Road. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance .Vacating and Closing a 0.220 Acre Strip of Unused and Unimproved Public Right-of--Way Bounded on the East Side by the Existing Right-of--Way for Ogden Road (Route 681) and Bounded on the West Side by a Parcel of Land Known as the Ogden Center Property (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) and to Authorize Sale of Said Parcel as Part of the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 5. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct and Operate a Police Outdoor Firearms Training Range, Located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Police Department. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) V. CITIZEN COM1ViENTS AND CO1bIIVIUNICATIONS w. ADJOURNMENT ~ R ~N C~mx~t~ of ~.nr~tn~~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 24, 1995 1QAR S M f1t 10Q Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS 1 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFING 1. Presentation on Greenways. (Bob Fetzer, Board Member, Valley Beautiful) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Addendum to the 1979 Water contract with the City of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Request from Total Action Against Poverty for Action Opposing Federal Cuts to TAP and Federal Community Services Block Grant Program. (Elizabeth Stokes, County Representative, TAP Board of Directors) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC F~CARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to Rezone a portion of 1.242 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Expand the Existing Building, Located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Joseph A. a Quesenberry. 2. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Broadcast Tower Atop Read Mountain Approximately .4 Mile North of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Virginia Towers Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone 7.17 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Construct a Townhome Project, Located Northwest of the Intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Wimmer Real Estate Network Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of Certain Parcels of Real Estate Located in the City of Salem (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) and Known as the Old County School Board Offices and Annex Located at 510 and 526 College Avenue, Salem, VA. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of an Easement to Appalachian Power Company for Electric Service Across Property Owned by the Board of Supervisors Near Spring Hollow for the Water Treatment Facility. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Roanoke County's Interest in Certain Real Estate (Regional Sanitary Landfill) to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, Subjecting Said Property to Certain Protective Covenants, and Certain Other Provisions. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3 3. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement from Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt in Connection with the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance Authorizing the Acquisition of a Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement from Honeywood Associates in Connection with the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 2. Southwest Development Financing, Inc. L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTIl~TE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for January 3, 1995. 2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit and 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 from the Cave Spring Knights Booster Club. 3. Request for Appropriation of $7,236 to School Operating Budget for Purchase of Electronic Reference Materials for Secondary School Library Media Centers. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Huntridge, Section 3. a M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -December, 1994 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of December 31, 1994 6. Summary of County Ridership and Costs for Valley Metro 7. Bond Project Status Report 8. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of December 31, 1994 9. Proclamations Signed by Chairman 10. Second Quarter Report of Claim Activity for the Self- Insurance Program. P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. WORK SESSION (5:00 PM -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) s 1. Work Session with School Board and School Personnel on Structure of Teachers' Salary Scale. R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION T. BRIEFINGS 1. Draper Aden Associates Report on Utility Rates. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to Amend Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 22, Water, and Section 18-168, Schedule of Charges of Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, of the Roanoke County Code. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 2. Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of An Existing 15-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and Acceptance of a Relocated Portion of the Same Easement Across Lot 9, Box 6, Plat of One Oak Road. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3. Ordinance Vacating and Closing an Unimproved Section of Old Road Lying Between Properties Owned by Stranna Arthur, Et Als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1- 6 11), and Extending in a Northeasterly Direction through Property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1- 10) to the Existing Ogden Road. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance Vacating and Closing a 0.220 Acre Strip of Unused and Unimproved Public Right-of--Way Bounded on the East Side by the Existing Right-of--Way for Ogden Road (Route 681) and Bounded on the West Side by a Parcel of Land Known as the Ogden Center Property (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) and to Authorize Sale of Said Parcel as Part of the Ogden Center Property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 5. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Private Kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6. Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct and Operate a Police Outdoor Firearms Training Range, Located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Roanoke County Police Department. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) V. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COINIlViU1VICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation on Greenways COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a briefing on Greenways. Mr. Bob Fetzer, Board Member of Valley Beautiful, plans to give a slide presentation which will be followed by questions and answers. ,~ ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens 1 ~ ~, .»~ i AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 RESOLIITION 12495-1 AIITHORISING THE ERECIITION OF AN ADDENDIIM TO THE 1979 WATER CONTRACT WITH T$E CITY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the County of Roanoke, and the Roanoke County Public Service Authority in 1979 entered into a contract relating to the ownership and conveyance of certain water and sewer lines and the sale of surplus water by the City to the County for 30 years; and WHEREAS, in 1992 litigation ensued between the City and the County with respect to this contract; and WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to amicably resolve and settle said litigation; and WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to amend certain sections of the 1979 contract in order to implement the settlement of this litigation and to resolve the differences between them with respect to this contract by the adoption of an addendum to said contract. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute this addendum to the 1979 water contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke. 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be sent to the Mayor of the City of Roanoke. 1 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. I#'olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance The Honorable David S. Bowers, Mayor, City of Roanoke 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~'~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Addendum to the 1979 Water Contract with the City of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: It is probably less expensive to the County to accept this settlement than to continue pursuing it in court. I must, however, point out that water bills for our citizens will be higher than they would otherwise. We wiU continue to pay Roanoke City 25% profct, beyond full operating costs through the year 2009. This amounts to approximately $300,000 per year currently. This is very advantageous for the City and allows them to subsidize other operations. This is a purchase of SURPLUS water and there is no commitment by the City to supply us if their demands increase beyond the supply of water. Because of this and because future demands for water exceed the City's water capacity, it was necessary to construct the Spring Hollow Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This Resolution authorizes the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors on behalf of the County to execute an Addendum to the 1979 Water Contract with the City of Roanoke. This Addendum would settle the current litigation between the City and the County over this Contract. In 1979 the City, County and the Roanoke County Public Service Authority entered into a contract relating to the ownership and conveyance of certain water and sewer lines and the sale of surplus water by the City to the County for 30 years. In 1991 the County raised certain objections to additional charges made by the City. Beginning in 1992 the County refused to pay these additional charges, and the City instituted legal action in Circuit Court to collect these amounts. While this legal action was pending, City and County staffs continued to discuss possible solutions to this dispute. These discussions culminated in a proposal to settle this litigation. This settlement was discussed with the Board in executive session, and an Addendum to the 1979 Water Contract was prepared to memorialize this settlement. 1 C'~ SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION The key elements of this settlement and Addendum are as follows: 1) County shall pay the City $1,250,535.86, and the City shall dismiss, with prejudice, its pending litigation. 2) The formula for calculating the rate for the purchase of bulk water shall be changed to a method based on rates actually charged to City water customers. 3) A reduction in the minimum water purchase requirements over the remaining life of the Contract from 2.5 MGD to 1.0 MGD. 4) An extension of the Contract from 2009 through 2015, and a reduction in the "f" factor in the formula from 1.25 to 1.125 for the term of this extension. 5) The addition of new provisions concerning water shortages and traded water. 6) The addition of a provision to bring this Contract within the "Special Fund Doctrine". 7) Finally, certain "housekeeping" provisions to coordinate the Addendum with the 1979 Contract. FISCAL IMPACTS• As settlement, the County will pay the City $1,250,535.86. Of this amount $111,074.40 represents water rate adjustments from July 1, 1994 to September 30, 1994 and should be appropriated from the current year water operating fund budget. The remaining $1,139,461.46 represents prior year rate adjustments and interest expense and should be appropriated from funds set aside for this purpose in the water surplus fund. In addition, to fund this contract amendment for the remainder of the 1994-95 fiscal year (October 1, 1994 to June 30, 1995) an additional $202,623 should be appropriated from the current year water operating fund budget. ALTERNATIVES• The Board may either accept this proposed settlement of this litigation by the adoption of the Resolution authorizing the execution of the Addendum to the 1979 Water Contract, or it may reject this settlement, refuse to authorize the execution of the Addendum, and proceed with the pending litigation. 2 E-i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the proposed Resolution authorizing the Chairman on behalf of the County to execute this Addendum to the 1979 Water Contract. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs lit.waterset r ~~ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE 1979 WATER CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the County of Roanoke, and the Roanoke County Public Service Authority in 1979 entered into a contract relating to the ownership and conveyance of certain water and sewer lines and the sale of surplus water by the City to the County for 30 years; and WHEREAS, in 1992 litigation ensued between the City and the County with respect to this contract; and WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to amicably resolve and settle said litigation; and WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to amend certain sections of the 1979 contract in order to implement the settlement of this litigation and to resolve the differences between them with respect to this contract by the adoption of an addendum to said contract. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute this addendum to the 1979 water contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke. 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be sent to the Mayor of the City of Roanoke. litwaterset.rso 1 C-r THIS ADDENDUM to the August 13, 1979, Contract between the City of_Roanoke, the County of Roanoke and the Roanoke County Public Service Authority is made and entered into this day of January, 1995, by and between the CITY OF ROANOKE, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "County"; W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, on August 13, 1979, the City, County and Roanoke County Public Service Authority entered into a contract relating to the ownership and conveyance of certain water and sewer lines and the sale of surplus water by the City to the County for a term of years ("1979 Contract"); WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Public Service Authority has been dissolved and its rights, dutfes, responsibilities and obligata.ons under the 1979 Contract have been assumed by the County; WHEREAS, the City and County desire to amend certain sections of the 1979 Contract, to delete certain sections of the 1979 Contract and to add certain new sections to the 1979 Contract, and such amendments, deletions and additions are hereinafter set forth in thus Addendum; WHSR~AS, it is the intent of the City and County that all provisions of the 1979 Contract not hereinafter amended or deleted shall remazn in full force and effect; and ~rr f WHEREAS, the City and County deem it mutually advantageous that the City continue to sell surplus water to the County under the terms of the 1979 Contract as hereinafter amended; THEREFpRE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants, agreements and obligations herein contained, the City and County hereto covenant and agree, one with the other, to the amendments, deletianB and additions to the 1979 Contract hereinafter set forth in this Addendum: 1. County payment; dismissal of litigation. Upon the execution of this Addendum, the County shall pay the City $1,250,535.86. The City shall immediately thereafter dismiss, with prejudice, its pending litigation against the County, styled City of Roanoke v. County of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, pending in the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke (Law No. CL9300011-00) and the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke (CL92000898-00). 2. Bulk water rates. (a} From and after July 1, 1994, and notwithstanding Sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of the 1979 Contract which sections remain effective through June 30, 1994, the City agrees to sell and the County agrees to buy surplus water at bulk rates as hereinafter set out and the rates shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula which has been mutually agreed upon by the parties: For Fiscal Years 1995 through 2009, the County Rate shall be the City Rate times a multiplier of 1.25. Far Fiscal Years 2010 through 2015, the County Rate shall be the City Rate times a multiplier of 1.125. 2 ~= f (b) The parties hereto agree that the words, terms and abbreviations used in this section and elsewhere in this Addendum shall have the following definitions: (1) "cf" shall mean cubic feet. (2) "City Customers" shall mean all water customers of the City of Roanoke who have Water Service within the City of Roanoke. City Customers shall not include Roanoke County, Botetourt County, the Town of Vinton or any other governmental entity which purchases water for use outside the boundaries of the City of Roanoke. (3) "City Rate" shall mean the rate per 100 cubic feet calculated pursuant to the following formula: Total Collars e;ierQW nll Clty Customere [or xotvr Service auiir,~] prevlvue FSacai Year Total 100 cf of avatar bllioa to all City cuatomor• Sn previous Fiacol Yeer The numerator of such formula shall exclude dollars charged to the County for water during the previous Fiscal Year, and the denominator shall exclude water. billed to the County during the previous ' Fiscal Year. (4) "County Rate" shall mean the rate charged to the County by the City for water under this contract calculated by multiplying the City Rate, as calculated pursuant to the above formula, 4ime~s the multiplier set out in Section 2(a) of this Addendum. (5) "Fiscal Year" shall mean the period from July 1 of any year to June 30 of the next succeeding year. 3 G "" Far example, "Fiscal Year 1995" shall mean June 1, 1994, to June 30, 3,995. (6} "Water Service" shall mean all water made available by the City of Roanoke to any customer for use f. within the City of Roanoke for any purpose and , which is billed on a periodic basis. (c} All items to be included in the rate calculation for each Fiscal Year shall be actual audited amounts from the preceding Fiscal Xear; provided, however, billings for the months of July, August and September of each Fiscal Year shall be at the estimated rate applicable to the previous Fiscal Year. Upon completion of the City's annual external audit, the estimated rate for the current Fiscal Year shall be computed utilizing actual audited amounts from the previous Fiscal Year, and the new estimated rate will be used to retroactively adjust the July, August and September invoices on the October invoice. At the end of each Fiscal Year, an adjustment shall be made and a settling up shall occur based on actual charges to City Customers and actual amounts of water billed to City Customers for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year. (d) Whenever the City shall propose any increase or decrease in the water rate charged to City Customers, the Airector of Finance of the City shall transmit to the Director of Finance of the County information with respect to such proposed rate increase ar decrease as soon as possible after such information is placed on the public agenda of City Council. 3. Minimum and maximum quantities. (a) Recognizing that the City has planned, financed and constructed its water treatment and transmission facilities of 4 i t r.. ~ .~ sufficient size and capability to make available to the County the minimum quantities of water required by Section 3(b) of this Addendum, and that by doing so the City is required to reserve capacity in its water system for the County whether or not the County takes any water, the County, accepting these representations by the City, agrees to pay, as an availability charge, for no less than the minimum quantity of water hereinafter set out in Section 3{b) during any Fiscal Year. (b) As an availability charge, from and after July 1, 1994, the County agrees to pay the City for not less than the following quantities of water during each Fiscal Year: FISCAL YEAR MINIMUM QUANTITY IN MGD 1995 2.5 1996 2.5 1997 2.25 1998 2.25 1999 2.25 2000 2.25 2001 2.0 2002 2.0 2003 2.0 2004 1.75 2005 1.75 2006 1.75 2047 1.5 2008 1.5 2009 1.5 2010 1.0 X011 1.0 5 ~~ FISCAL YEAR aant'd MINIMUM QUANTITY IN MGD ` 2012 1.0 2013 1.0 2014 1.0 2015 1.0 {c) As used in subsection {b) of this Section and elsewhere in this Addendum, "MGD" shall mean an annual average daily quantity in million gallons per day. (d) The maximum annual average daily quantity shall not for any Fiscal Year exceed the minimum annual average daily quantity by more than 120 percent (120$), and the City shall not in any Fiscal Year be obligated to make available to the County more than the maximum annual average daily quantity of water. The minimum and maximum annual average daily quantities established by this Section may be amended by written mutual agreement. (e) The City agrees to notify the County at least three (3) years prier to any known event or occurrence that would cause the City to be unable to supply the minimum quantities of water set forth in subsection (a) of this Section on a continuous daily basis. (f) The City shall not be deemed in breach of this Addendum for any failure to perform which results from circumstances beyond the City's reasonable control, such as breaks in transmission lines, mechanical or electrical failure, war, civil disturbance, natural catastrophe or Acts of God. In the event the City shall fail to make available to the County the minimum 6 ~/ quantity of water required by Section 3(b) of this Addendum for any of the aforesaid reasons, then the County shall pay for water actually delivered at the County Rate. 4. Source of payments. The County shall make payment for all amounts payable under the 1979 Contract and this Addendum exclusively from revenues received by the County from charges paid by users of its water system and available to it for such purpose, for so long as the County operates its water system separate and apart from its sewer system. If the County determines to operate its water and sewer systems on a combined basis, then such charges may be paid exclusively from revenues of its combined water and sewer systems. The County agrees to fix, charge and collect from the user$ of .its water system, or its combined water and sewer systems, as the case may be, rates, fees and other charges that will be sufficient to make the payments required under the 1979 Contract and this Addendum and all other charges against its water system, or its combined water and sewer systems, as the case may be, and to revise the same from time to time as may be necessary to make such payments. The charges payable under the 1979 Contract and this Addendum shall not be deemed to create or constitute an indebtedness or a pledge of the faith and credit of the County for purposes of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 5. Monthly invoices. All amounts payable under this Addendum shall be invoiced on a monthly basis. Amounts .invoiced shall be due thirty (30} days mfter the date of receipt of the invoice. Invoices shall be deemed 7 1...." received three (3) days after being mailed, first class, postage prepaid, by U. S. Mail. Each invoice shall itemize the readings for each water meter providing bulk water. Interest compounded monthly at the legal interest rate pursuant to 56.1-330.53, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, or its successor section, shall be due on accounts thirty (30) oz more days past due. If at the end of any Fiscal Year, the amount of water billed to the County shall be less than the amount made available by the City pursuant to Section 3 a£ this Addendum, the County shall pay for the difference at the County Rate within thirty {30) days after billing. 6. Water shortages. During times of short term water shortages or emergencies (thirty (30) days or less), the water needs of the City and County shall be treated equitably with available water of the City being shared with the County on a Pro rata basis considering the total water produced and delivered to customers, retail and wholesale, by the City during the twelve (12) complete calendar months immediately preceding compared to the amount of such water delivered to the County, 7. Traded water. The parties hereto recognize that the City and County are each producers of water and that each may, from time to time, have excess water and that it may be desirable, from time to time, for the parties to trade water pursuant to written mutual agreement. Any water traded pursuant to written mutual agreement during any Fiscal Year shall not be charged for, or paid for, by either party. Water traded pursuant to written mutual agreement shall be counted 8 ~~~ toward the minimum and maximum purchases specified in Section 3 of this Addendum. • 8. Repeal, of Sections 2.5 and 3.2 of 1979 Contract. Sections 2.5 and 3.2 of the 1979 Contract are hereby repealed and deleted. 9. Term. Section 3.1 of the 1979 Contract is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: "Section 3.1. Term. This Addendum shall become effective upon its execution, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, and the 1979 Contract as amended by this Addendum shall be in full force and effect through June 30, 2015." 10. Termination for breach of contract. Section 3.3 of the 1979 Contract is hereby amended to read and provide as follows: "Section 3.3. Termination for breach of contract. No terminative of this Contract, other than by expiration under Section 3.1, a$ amended, shall occur except after notice in writing of such intent to terminate stating a breach of contract perfected by a declaratory judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction in favor of the party seeking termination." 9 C I T,1'_ATTOFNEY TEL No . T03-224 X3071 ?a.n 19 , 95 1 1 ~ 1 r PJn .002 F' . 1 1 ~ -1 11. Extent of agreement; modification. T}~e 1979 Contract and thl.s Addendum. represent the entire integrated agreement between the parties and supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written yr oral. The 1979 Contract and this Addendum may be amended only by written agreement signed by the City and County. 12. Construction. Except as amended by this Addendum, the 1979 Contract shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the 1979 Contract and the provisions of this Addendum, then to the extent of such inconsistency, this Addendum shall supersede the 1979 Contract. 13. Severabilit~ of invalid provisions. If any clause, provision or section of the 1979 contract and this Addendum shall be held to be illegal or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the illegality or invalidity of the clause, provision or section shall riot affect any of the remaining clauses, provisions or sections, and the 1979 Contract and this Addendum shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid clause, provision ox section had not been contained in it. 14. Counterparts. This Addendum shall be executed in two counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, and the 10 CIT-~`, aTTOF:NEY TEL hJu.~03-?24,:0,1, ?an 1~+.~{5 11~1T ~~Jo.00L~ F~.1~ .. ~~ counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: ATTEST: Mary F. Parker, City Clerk CITY OF ROANOKE By David A . Bowers , Mayor ATTEST: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTY OF ROANOKE By H. Odell Minnix, Chairman Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: 11 A-12495-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) for Action Opposing Federal Cuts to TAP and Federal Community Services Block Grant Program. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. E. Cabell Brand, Chairman, TAP Board of Directors, in the attached letter dated January 5, 1995, has requested that the Board write a letter to Governor Allen and Congressman Goodlatte opposing state and federal cuts to TAP and the federal Community Services Block Grant. Mr. Brand and Elizabeth Stokes, County representative on the TAP Board of Directors, have been invited to attend the January 24th meeting in order to brief the Board on how the cuts will affect the TAP programs. .~ ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------- -------------------------------- ACTION ------------ VOTE ------- Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Kohinke to send letters as Eddy x Received ( ) recuested to Gov. Allen and Johnson x Referred ( ) Cona. Goodlatte and draft Kohinke x To ( ) resolution for 2/14/95 Board Minnix x meeting Nickens x cc: File E. Cabell Brand, Chairman, TAP Board of Directors Elizabeth W. Stokes, County Representative, TAP ~I~ Recovery Systems Inc. 957 Kime Lane P. 0. Box 429 Salem, Virginia 24153 January 5, 1995 (703) 387-3402 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Hodge: As you may have noticed from recent news articles, TAP's core funding of $787,005 is in jeopardy. $652,005 of that comes to TAP in a Federal Community Services Block Grant (CSBG}. $135,846 of that amount comes to TAP in a State Community Services Block Grant (CSBG). TAP then is able to take this amount and leverage it on a more than 10 to one basis into a nine million dollar budget for the 39 programs to help low-income residents move towards self-sufficiency. We are proud of the financial support we have had from local governments. Last year that support totaled $295,349. In addition, the United Ways of the TAP territory contributed $127,952 to TAP's effort and our own development effort raised another $100,000. Suffice it to say, that if our core funding is cut off at the federal and state level, we would be forced to try to make up that amount at the local level. We are well aware of how difficult that would be. At present, Governor Allen has put in an amendment that would zero out the State CSBG $2.1 million going to the 26 Community Action Agencies. Our budget would be cut $135,846 beginning July 1, 1995. At at the prresent time the federal CSBG's future is uncertain, but we must assume the worst. I am asking each of our 11 local governments to write Governor Allen asking to withdraw his proposed cuts of $2.1 million for Community Action and to write Congressman Bob Goodlatte indicating your support for TAP and the federal Community Services Block Grant so critical to TAP's survival. To the best of our ability and resources, we have done everything possible to augment the efforts of local governments to assist low-income families. We are a local, private, non-profit corporation with 7 volunteers for every paid staff. It would be difficult to fill that gap if TAP were not here. Enclosed are some recent articles and additional information that may be helpful. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact either Ted Edlich at TAP (345-6781) or myself. Sincerely yours, ., E. Cabell Brand Chairman TAP Board of Directors Enclosures ~"~ Total Action Against Poverty - 1993-1994 Head Start: Comprehensive Health Investment Protect: Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) Protect Discovery: General Education Development (GED): Drug Ellminatlon: Literacy: General Education Development (GED): Vocational Education: '~~eatherizatlon: Rehabllitatlon and Repaired: SHARE-HIP (t.lortgage ~ Rental Default): HUD Counseling: VA CARES -TAP Offender: Ex-Offender Family Counseling: ti'~omen's Resource Center: Transltlonai Llving Center: Southwest VA Second Harvest Food Bank: 697 children served 815 parents 1 , 097 :^iidren 210 youth ~,vorked summer jobs 208 students active 126 youth served 201 children 250 adults 71 adult students 91 adult ~tuCents 185 homes ~:reathenzeo 138 homes rehabilitated 60 housenoids 211 families served 353 cffer,cers served 322 famines served 224 famines 289 hcmeless 2,300,000 meals provided Total Action Against Poverty - 1965-1994 ~~ Head Start: 17,000 children served. Comprehensive Health Investment Project: 1,500 children served since 1990. Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP): 6,985 youth worked summer jobs. Project Discovery: 2,250 students attended college. General Education Development (GED): 4,120 youth served since 1965. Drug Elimination: 4,450 clients served since 1965. Literacy : 800 persons are now literate. General Education Development (GED): 2,950 adult students. Vocational Education: 8,535 adult students. Weatherizatlon: 5,500 homes weatherized. Rehabilitation and Repair: 2,140 homes rehabilitated. SHARE-HIP (Mortgage & Rental Default): 369 households. HUD Counseling: 2,425 families served. VA CARES -TAP Offender Services: 3,000 ex-offenders served. Ex-Offender Family Counseling: 435 families served. High Risk Drug Prevention: 4,200 At Risk Citizens served. Women's Resource Center: 6,400 women 8~ children assisted. Transitional Living Center: 1,600 homeless since 1988. Southwest VA Second Harvest Food Bank: 23,000,000 lbs. food distributed. State Wide Agencies developed by TAP Virginia Water Project, 1968-94, now 45,116 households in Virginia. serving 7 states, connects low-income households with safe water and sewers: VA CARES, 1979-94, now serving VA in 27 cities and 18 counties, pre and post release counseling and services: 27,390 Ex-offenders served. Project Discovery, Inc., 1983-94, 18 sites, First generation minority and low income college bound youth: CHIP, 1988-94, 9 VA sites, Childrens' comprehensive medical services: 7,540 college bound students. 2,097 children enrolled. (Roanoke site only) ~~ TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 1992-1993 I. Jobs, Income, Economic Activity and Local Taxes Generated by TAP Programs: Jobs Generated for Clients: Summer Youth 2 4 0 Employment Training Services 1 0 1 Other 3 4 3 Jobs Maintained through TAP intervention 155 Direct Client Income $ 3, 5 7 8, 2 2 7 TAP Employee Income: $ 3, 4 6 3, 6 4 8 1 -- Local Economic Activity : $1 4, 0 8 3, 7 5 0 2 Estimated Local Tax Revenue : $1 , 4 9 5 , 7 6 8 II. Estimated Savings from TAP Programs: To the Public (State and Federal): $ 5 , 3 4 4 , 0 9 6 3 Additional Savings to Localities : $1 ,1 61 , 6 01 TOTAL SAVINGS: $6,506,697 1 The economic income multiplier has an estimated value of 2 (1.45 for entry level jobs). That is, salaries "turn over" two times in local economic activity. 2 The U. S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that local governments receive 10% of the salary turnover figure in utility, sales, and real estate taxes. 3 Administrative overhead cost to the locality is conservatively estimated at 20%. t ._. ~ - `parr-:-r :s;{ ~-~' iP.*E~°F - I. ESTIMATED LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY GENERATED BY TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY (TAP) 1992-93 A. EMPLOYMENT Acquisition of employability skills, occupational training and critical support services are the keys to sustained unsubsidized employment and self-sufficiency. During this year, TAP Programs provided training for 214 unemployed people, placed 314 participants in unsubsidized jobs and assisted 191 families to move from welfare to employment by providing critical support services. Direct Local Income to Client Economic Local Income Activity t Gov't ENROLLEES IN TAP EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS • 240 Summer Youth Employment Program enrollees (ages 14-21) received wages and training allowances totalling: $ 5 7 8, 2 4 3 $1 , 1 5 6, 4 8 6 $115,649 • 138 parents of Head Start and Day Care children were able to work because of the full time child care program. Assuming each parent worked at least 9 months C~ $737 average wage, they earned $1 01 , 7 0 6 $ 2 0 3, 4 1 2 $ 2 0, 3 4 1 • 64 adults and 32 youth were placed in unsubsidized employment upon completion of their training in Adult Basic Education, Occupational classroom training or OJT. The average monthly wage was $789. Assuming each person worked at least 5 months, they earned: • 118 people participated in employment services such as job clubs, job banks, career exploration and job readiness activities and were assisted in finding non-subsidized employment. At an average wage of $789 and assuming each worked at least 5 months they earned: $378,720 $757,440 $75,744 $465,510 $931,020 $93,102 _ ~#.~ ~: ax r°r 3.-j 5 Summer Youth Employment Program participants were placed in unsubsidized jobs at the end of the program. The average wage for these placements was $632 per month. Assuming each worked at least 5 months, they earned $15,800 $31,600 S3,160 • 82 Ex-offenders found placement in unsubsidized employment through our Offender Program. At an average income of $832 per month and assuming they worked 5 months they earned: $ 5 9 9, 0 4 0 $1 ,1 9 8, 0 8 0 $1 1 9, 8 0 8 • 94 participants in Community Sentencing and Diversion Programs were able to continue their employment. At the monthly average wage of $737, and assuming each participant worked for 6 months, they earned: • 13 participants in the Alcohol Counseling program who were not employed when they entered the program, after counseling and a period of sobriety, each found a job. Assuming each worked 3 months C~ $832 per month, they earned: • 48 participants in the Alcohol Counseling program who were employed when they entered the program, through treatment were able to maintain their employment. Assuming each continued to work at least 4 months ®t $832 per month, they earned: $415,668 $831,336 $83,134 $32,448 $64,896 $6,490 $159,744 $319,488 $31,949 ~` Other Benefits From Employment Programs • 240 participants in the Summer Youth Employment returned to local public secondary schools. The average state reimbursement, (including ADM. and sales tax returned to localities for education) is $463.27 per pupil. Assuming 95% (228) of the participants remain in school all year, the localities will receive: • 102 youth and adults received vocational training through TAP job training programs. Assuming that 50% (51) will earn at least ($3,000 more per year because of their further education ,and will work at least 6 months at that additional income level, through TAP intervention and programs they will earn an additional B .HOUSING Direct Local Income to Client Economic Local Income Activity ~ Gov't 2 $76,500 $153,000 $15,300 A stable living arrangement in sanitary and safe housing is dependent upon timely payments by tenants/homeowners, availability of code approved units, rental subsidies, federal and state homeownership loans and sufficient support services. During this year 174 families with more than 550 family members were able to remain in their homes through counseling for renters in arrears and homeowners facing foreclosure, and housing rehabilitation efforts Additionally 250 persons were safely housed and assisted through the Transitional Living Center. found safe and decent housing through TAP efforts. Direct Local Income to Client Economic Local Income ActivitK 1 Gov't 2 • 72 houses were rehabilitated by TAP housing programs. Municipal assessors estimate a rehabilitated house will provide 10 more years of occupancy and real estate taxes will increase. The average increased value of houses was $1,319. Property taxes at an average of $1.00 per $100 on increased value only, generated additional tax revenue of: $105,626 $950 . _ _.~ .. ~~ • 26 houses were saved from foreclosure. Retention of these houses by the existing homeowners assured continued tax revenues for local property taxes. The average value of homes saved was $55,000. Applying the average property tax rate of $1.00 of $100, revenue generated was: • 64 subsidized units, (Section 8), providing shelter to 175 low-income people, were administered through TAP. The subsidy generated $117,184 for landlords and payment by renters of $217,664 resulted in approximately: $14,300 $334,848 $33,485 • 12 elderly homeowners were assisted in applying for HECMs (Home Equity Conversion Mortgages). At an average award of $35,000 each, the disposable income of these households will increase by: $420,000 $840,000 $84,000 C.TAP PERSONNEL TAP programs hire professional, para-professional and unskilled workers. Many employees have originally been low-income program participants, today, through education, training and on the job experience they are among the ranks of professional and para-professional employees at TAP. The average salary of a community action worker is $11,614. Direct Local Income to Client Economic Local Income Activity t Govt 2 • In 1992, 321 area residents were employed by TAP. This includes full-time, part-time, and summer staff. Personnel records show these employees earned: $3,463,648 $ 6, 9 2 7, 2 9 6$ 6 9 2, 7 3 0 ~• ~. RECAP OF TOTAL EARNINGS 1. Direct Employment Services $ 2, 7 4 6, 8 7 9 2. Other Benefits from Employment Programs $ 7 6 , 5 0 0 3. Housing (Economic Activity and Taxes) $ 7 5 4 , 8 4 8 4. Area TAP employees $ 3, 4 6 3, 6 4 8 5. Direct Income to Localities $1 , 6 1 9, 9 2 4 Direct Client Income TOTAL EARNINGS, LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, AND TAX INCOME TO GOVERNMENTS IN THE TAP SERVICE AREA: $7,041,875 Local Income to Economic Local Activity 1 Gov't $14,083,750 $1,495,768 G ~ /..}~k II. ESTIMATED SAVINGS GENERATED BY TAP PROGRAMS July, 1992 - June, 1993 Additional Savings to Savings in Public Local Gov't Expenditures (administrative Federal/State) costs A.SAVINGS IN WELFARE EXPENDITURES • Because 11 Head Start parents were enabled to hold jobs they avoided welfare for at least 6 mos., saving an average ADC payment of $265/mo.: $1 7,490 $3,498 • 30 families of ex-offenders left the welfare rolls. These families avoided additional welfare payments for at least 4 months per family, saving an average ADC payment of $265 per month: $31,800 $6,360 B .SAVINGS IN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 423 households containing 698 people were screened and received emergency assistance to ease the lack of food, shelter, utilities, fuel, clothing and health care. The following savings were realized from the welfare department emergency funds. • Utility bill payments secured by TAP staff working with individuals and families with crisis needs replaced emergency grants from welfare departments for 22 households, with 53 family members saving an average $195 utility grant from-the welfare department: $ 4, 2 9 0 $ 8 5 8 • 130 households with 304 family members received emergency food orders. Assuming 50% of the households would have had to request the average $50 emergency grant for food from the welfare department, savings totalled $ 6, 5 0 0 $1 , 3 0 0 L-"- ~- • 53 households with 78 family members received emergency funds to pay their rents substantially reducing the incidence among the group of forced relocation, eviction or continued homelessness. Emergency fund requests from welfare at an average of $175 would otherwise have cost: $ 9, 2 7 5 $ 1, 8 5 5 • 25 people received medical assistance through direct payments to doctors, hospitals, pharmacists and other medical personnel. Assume one-half of these people (13) would have had to rely on State/Local Hospital Fund payments for inpatient care at $344 per day for an average 5 day admission and outpatient care at an average cost of $40poer patient, the savings were: $ 2 2, 8 8 0 $ 4, 5 7 6 • 204 low-income homes were weatherized saving an average of 40% per year on fuel bills. At least 20% (41) avoided fuel assistance requests to the welfare department of an average $195, saving: $ 7 , 9 9 5 $1 , 5 9 9 An additional 193 households received emergency assistance for which savings cannot be determined.. Savings In Welfare & Welfare-Related Payments $1 0 0, 2 3 0 $ 2 0, 2 4 6 C. SAVINGS ON DEFAULTS AND EVICTIONS • Default counseling for families who were behind in mortgage payments and in danger of losing their homes, saved 26 homes from foreclosure. Foreclosure estimates cost taxpayers approximately $1,010 so TAP counseling saved: $ 2 6, 2 6 0 $ 6, 5 6 5 • TAP housing counselors assisted 136 families in avoiding eviction. Savings to local taxpayers at $31 per eviction equaled: $ 4 , 2 1 6 r C' D. SAVINGS IN MEDICAID/MEDICARE EXPENDITURES • An estimated 10% (51) of the people whose homes were weatherized avoided cold-related illness. Assuming that half of these persons were eligible for Medicaid/Medicare (~ avg. $5,166/hospitalization), this saved $263,466 • A conservative estimate is that 5% (698) of the persons in the households receiving emergency assistance remained healthy. Assuming that half were Medicaid eligible and avoided a 6 day hospital stay x$5,166, this saved: $1,802,934 $52,693 $360,587 • Approximately 20% (12) of the clients in the alcohol counseling program avoided a hospital stay because of better health from longer periods of sobriety following counseling. Assuming that 75% would have been eligible for Medicaid, the missed hospitalizations saved an average Medicaid paid stay of 5 days at $5,166 per day, or $ 4 6, 4 9 4 -$ 9, 2 9 9 • 923 individuals received medical screening and/or treatment through TAP sponsored (CHIP) free medical and dental care, family specialist care, etc. Records suggest that 25% of the clients (231) avoided a hospital stay because of early diagnosis and treatment. Assuming 80% would have been Medicare/Medicaid eligible for the average $5,166 hospitalization cost, the savings were: $ 9 5 5, 71 0 $1 9 1 ,1 4 2 ... .. ~ .Aa:_'.: ~^ E. SAVINGS IN EDUCATION • An estimated 50% (358) of the children enrolled in Head StarUHome Start will be enabled through the program's educational, nutritional, and medical benefits to avoid Special Education (~ $4,582/per child) and go into regular classrooms. Savings in their first school year: • 65 handicapped children receiving special services in the Head Start program avoid enrollment in the public school preschool handicapped program at an estimated $3,500 per child per year, saving: • 50% (13) of the 25 adolescents enrolled in TAP tutoring and alternative schools increased their academic competencies and remained in school These students remained on attendance rolls, reducing the potential loss of state education funds of $4,995 per student per year by: Savings in Public Expenditures (Federal/State) $1,640,356 $227,500 Additional Savings to Local Gov't (administrative costs $328,071 $45,500 $64,935 ,:y u~ _'~ G SAVINGS ON COSTS OF ARRESTS, JAIL STAYS, DETENTION • An estimated 10% of the 572 youth who participated in TAP's educational and employment programs avoided at least one stay in detention at an estimated cost of $1,709/juvenile detention, saving: $97,413 • a) An estimated 10% (45) of persons who received alcohol counseling avoided one arrest, saving $197/arrest procedure (local cost): N/A b) An estimated 20% (40) of youth avoided a stay in juvenile detention because of alcohol counseling, saving (0$1,709) per stay): $43,160 • Follow-up records suggest that 33% (211) of counseled adult clients avoided at least one alcohol arrest, saving approx. $197/arrest procedure (local cost): N/A TOTAL $140,573 TOTAL SAVINGS IN PUBLIC AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES: $5,344,096 $19,483 $8,865 $8,632 $41,567 $78,547 $1,161,601 G 'p~ ~~c- tea. . ~ ~~ f 4 - ~ - _ - .- ~. TAP foun ' der leaven to ost g pp AS CABt.LL BRAND announced his successor• plans Wednesday to step down as With public sentiment railing against poverty programs, government prpching wel- chairman of Total Action Against fare reform and with core state furtdirtg in Poverty, he talked with the agency's f~pardy, Brans satd he rs rat likely to stray leaders about setting a course for ••I•m going to be here through this kgis- the fUtllre. lative session;' he said. "Cm going to be here ~- ~-•-~:~-M..-- - Cabell Brand, who founded TAP in 1965, -- . -- ---.. - plans to continue to work with the agency and s; ~;~,~,;,.: • .see it through leadership transition. --- - - .t.._.-~.,.-. .~ --1 __ ,.~ TAP FROM PAGE Al Economic Opportunity, . Brand's agency adopted the acronym TAP, for Total Action Against Poverty, and took up head- quarters in an old flour mill on ' Shenandoah Avenue. Thirty years later, settled into new offices occu- ;, pied after a 1989 fire destroyed its :: original headquarters, TAP has not _ ~~ ' wavered. from Brand's original ~ .~` mission. TAP has 39 programs that in ~:::: part tackle problems that Brand says ::. are simply the results of having a `~~~: civilized, democratic, free enterprise ~:: society -homelessness, hunger, :~~:~: lack of education, poor child health `~ '~'+'~"`~ ~~"~ ~`' care. "We do those things that the private sector has not been able to do :`: and the government cannot," Brand :~.~=~;~;~:::~ said. But he wonders, with the politi- :: cal climate shifting, what TAP ~: should do as it approaches the next century. "The culture of the voter today '~' seems to be that not only do they not ':'.~`:~~•'•`•'•"'~~'•` want to pay more taxes, but they ,,,,.;,~....;,,;..,, don't want the governments to do as . ~ - much as they've been doing," Brand ' - said. "Tile message has not gotten out to the people yet or even to many of BY LESLIE TAYLOR STAFF NSMTER E. Cabell Brand, who 30 years ago founded Roanoke's Total Action Against Povtrty, announced Wednesday that he would step down as the agency's chairran in September. 1 think it's a new day," Brand said. "I think we've got a have a new type of leader- ship succession. And you know, how many years should [ do itT' Brand, 71, said he would not seek re- election after his term u chairman of TAP's board of directors ends in September. He will, however, continue to work with the agency and see it through leadership transition. He hu appointed a search committee to find a through this congressional seuion. And I'm going a continue to devote what brae and Cnergy I have. "We must position ourselves to dal with the political climate of this camtry.^ In the mid-1960s, the climate was ripe for anti-poverty efforts. President Lyndon Johnson had declared a rtatiortal, 'lutoortdi. tional" war on poverty. Brand - a Salem native and third- generation head of his family's shoe businw - drutnmed up wpptM in 1965 for aatiao of a ktcal community at:tioo agertry coda the Economic Opportunity Act, backed by the . ]ohnson administrtttion. with some assistance, ' Brand raised enough wpport to apply for ~ up funding through the federal office _ ~ PLEASE SEE TAt~ E. CABELL BRAND Date of birth: April 11,1923, in Salem $2.1 million in Community Service" Block Grant money for the state's 26::. community action agencies, TAP-' included. The money is core fund-„ ing, as agencies use it to leverage'' other money. TAP used its $140,000 share of block grant money this year to bring in another $340,000 from other sources. That, combined with $650,000 in federal money, provides the base for TAP's $9 million budget. Should the proposal pass, and ~: with the Republican leadership in - Congress announcing that it will cut programs borne of Johnson's Great. Society, Brand said "TAP is either out of business ... or we have to figure out a way to replace this :`.~`.•~!. i [money] locally." ;;:: ~ Wednesday, Brand gathered the "" TAP board and a group of commu- nity leaders to brainstorm TAP's short- and long-term business strat- egy. His purpose was twofold: to discuss how TAP should position itself to deal with the political reality of the country and to ask for help in <{ selecting his successor and ways to .;t<<w~: broaden the agency's community ~ ~~:::::~~~~~~:~-~~: leadership. •~•"~~~~~~~'`' ~ +j • -Brand said TAP must overcome a" perception that- it is 'a •federal ~: handout program, equated with _- `' welfare. ~ , " "Our challenge is hopefully our government officials and elected who would do it? How would it get American people, local people, will ~ _~ officials that what we do in our work done?" realize what TAP has done here for - here is extraordinarily cost= Virginia Gov. George~-'Allen's- 30 years is the most cost-effectiyt: effecxive. And if we didn't do it, . budget proposals wouldg diminata,-.a stray todeal with '' ~eti~ld: = - - ~; WAYNE DEEUStaff -~- ,. ' + EDITORIALS TAP, upping away at poverty AIyTI-poverty efforts and entrepre- neurshi~.may seem an odd mix -but only,ta.those unfamiliar,with Roanoke- based dotal Action Against Poverty. . Gov.'Gebrge Allen, among others; would'dii well to familiarize himself with its work. Like other, largely `unsung community-action agencies throughout the United States, TA~,'s job is -has been for going on 30 years - to offer the poor not a handout but a helping hand ~Yp:`Consider, for example, TAP's new "~ritrepreneurial class." l~fi~Ighborhood bakeries, beauty shops,~~day-care centers, even ahot-dog stand -these sorts of .small businesses keep llie"pulse of communities beating ' strorig;'a'nd offer hope~of resuscitation to faltering ones. They are the hope, too, of people who dream of owning and operating their own businesses. Many low-income people, contrary perhaps to stereotype, share that dream, but they,often lack the knowledge and the capital to get started. TAP is offer- ing alittle of each - a 14-week class and a small loan - to help what is so far a handful of students take a crack at getting into business. TAP can't guarantee their success. No businessperson starts with that guar- antee. But in typical fashion, the non- profit a'g'ency is chiseling away~obsta- ;cles and disadvantages so the people that it can reach -and this is by no means~all ~f the region's poor - at least~have an opportunity to act on their dreamsc Urilike government assistance pro- grams designed to give the poor enough cash; food and housing subsidies to sur- vive,; TAP's purpose is to get them enough-education and training to get a job and;become self-supporting: Yet, even;as;thc Allen administration is pro- posing atwo-year limit on welfare ben- efits, the governor's budget amend- ments would eliminate state Commu- nity Service Block Grants that, together with federal grants, give community agencies such as TAP their seed mon- ey. The administration needs to recon- sider. TAP uses its government funding as leverage to raise far more in private donations. With t5e support of legions of volunteers, it helps provide for edu- cation, employment training, counsel- ing, emergency shelter for abused women and other support services that help people become self-sufficient. The well-worn proverb advises thaf ~ if you give a hungry man a fish, he can eat that day; if you teach him to fish, he can eat every day. Throughout its pro- ductive 30 years, TAP has worked not only to teach the hungry to fish, but to make sure they have the hook and line needed to do so. The Allen administration would cut the line, then two years later take away the free fish.' Breaking the cycle of welfare dependency fostered by government programs is a worthy goal. Success will benefit not only taxpayers, but also those caught up in a system that allows subsistence living but little hope. Suc- cess won't happen, though, without strategies that work. Community action works. It is itself, in many ways, entre- preneurial. Mixing hard-nosed business with do-good social work? TAP's paid and volunteer workers have for three decades swum in such crosscurrents, playing a vital community role by help- ing people move from dependency to productivity. If we are to have the poor always with us, let's hope TAP remains right there, too. ~` •~` .~"~'` ~"•'.~ 1C[>a~tl0ke'~i11eSF~W~I'~d-NeWS~ .,.~- .~.~, _ . rt„ .n - r_ ~: - .~ , ~ r: ~ COMMENTARY ~~ r-~~ ~~~ ~n .:~ va a w~ ~u ma e e .::.::::..: B EDWIN R. FEINOUR Y developed Virginia CARES? Who would have brought „;;; together local colleges and school systems to start 1995 MARKS the third decade of Total Action Project Discovery, which has assisted 7,5401ow-income. Against Poverty serving individuals and families in the and minority students to seek post-secondary education .Roanoke Valley. when college enrollment of these groups was in decline During the holiday season, many of us enjoyed the What would have been the impetus for bringing together rerun of the Hollywood classic "It's A Wonderful Life.' the Health Department and private h sicians to be in '::':'`~'`~i :~' `ii A local banker faces the destruction of everythin he has ,the Com rehensive p Y K `.::built and the devasta ' g . i p Health Investment Program, which ::::::._::.:`, ling impact this will have on his now has served 2,097 children in the Roanok family and friends. He wonders ab a Valle ` out the worth of h' ;- with primary-care services? y "`~`~`-~~~~~~" •iife and whether he has made an e ~ t ~m ac t on Wh th a Y P worldt ~ wou _ _ He contemplates suicide, but instead meets an an el wh ` the Transition Id the l,b-DO homeless people served by ,:_._::,...:::,_. :~:. shows him what his fa g o al Living Center have done if TAP had not :: mily s life would have been likr< existed? Where would th :`.. had he not existed. ey have gone and where would ~~:~ they be now? Which or anization would ,.,.__._••• ............ .. In so many wa s, even afi y g have filled the '.::_..•.••• ..._ Y er 29 years, TAP remam~ gap and started services that assisted 6,400 abused ~~ ~ one of the best untold stories in the Roanoke Valley. The women and children had not TAP begun the valley's TAP story is known best to those whose lives have been first Women's Center? To whom would these desperate touched and changed by TAP opportunities and caring families have turned? support, while most of the valley residents are not aware For sure there would be no Henry Street Music of even c portion of the TAP impact in our community. Center and less hope for a revitalized Henry Street. The Books on Roarioke's history omit TAP. Too many might Harrison School surely would have been bulldozed and assume that there would be little difference in our valley the Harrison Museum for African-American Culture today if TAP had not been here. would not exist, nor the annual Henry Street festival If TAP had not been here, who would have reached enjoyed by tens of thousands each year. There would out annually to more than 8,000 low-income people to still be drug dealers and pushers dominating the 19th and ,help them toward self-sufficiency through education, Melrose shopping center instead of a neighborhood gro- health care, decent and affordable housing and employ- eery, pharmacy and retail store. went? Who would have provided a Head Start experi- In all likelihood, Roanoke would not be known ence for 17,000 children, remedial education for 4,120 today for the level of networking and interagency coop- dropouts,- and employment training and placement for eration had TAP not been here: The nature of this local, _ yet another 11,483 persons? private agency is to network, to build bridges, to coor- :- " _-"'`~` Who would have had the man wer and resources dinate and cooperate, to make.a difference for those who ' ` _ ~"_~`~'' =` -" ~ "-~ = - to start Legal Aid, The Southwest Vpr inia Develo ment cannot do so with their one voice alone. Its u r~-~= -' " ''~= Fund, the Blue Rid a Housin g p p bltc- ;~:.>.-~ : '~~~ ~~ -~: g g and Development Corp. private partners include local banks, the Department of ~_~~, _ :~ ", _ ~`•?~ and the Southwest Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank? Social Services, churches, the Fifth District Employ- ~'- ;_:~ :?::.__=-,~ Who would have listened to the rural residents' plea went and Training consortium, local governments and _ "; ~.} - - for potable water and indoor plumbing and been able to their various departments, and state department affilia- T ~~~ -_:•~_ .< - :_'_-~~ develop the Virginia Water Project, which has brought tions such as education, health, housing and community _ _ ~"°~__:-__.==='~`_ _`_ safe water and waste systems to more than 45,000 development and criminal justice services. ~ households in Virginia. Which organization would have Roanoke .has been known for its positive level of ~,,..._,' ; - tackled the problem of helping 27,930 former prison race relations. Due credit is frequently given area leaders -~ "' ~- = inmates start a new crime-free life had not TAP during desegregation. But-what if TAP had not been '~ . .. _ ,. . _ - _ ~_ _ - - - -_ _ - ~- - - _ - .~OSII~- Ii-~- . _ _ =_ - -_ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ___ - _ - - _ -. _ _ -r, - - - - - - _ - - _ y~ L.. '~• I there to conduct human-relations training with young- stern in the schools during the desegregation process? If TAP had not organized low-income and minority com- munities to address their concerns with words rather than actions? If TAP had not been there as a model equal- ' opportunity employer? Over 29 years, TAP has brought more than $200 million into the Roanoke economy to help provide opportunities for low-income citizens. More than 20 percent of those resources went into the pockets of par- ticipants as training stipends and wages. Forty percent went to area vendors to buy vehicles, office equipment, i building supplies and more. That $80 million provided j $160 million of economic activity in the valley. What would the difference of subtracting that amount of eco- nomic activity have meant for the entire community? Who would have paid for the multimillion dollars in cost savings by helping people stand on their own two feet and take charge of their own lives? As we enter 1995, it is important that TAP be kept on the area agenda. It is important that the Community Service Block Grant, which provides TAP's actual core funding, be protected. These critical dollars, amounting to approximately $650,000 a year, are leveraged by TAP into a $10 million budget. It is important that we all seek to support TAP as well with our dollars, our time and our i prayers. Welfare reform is on the top of the agenda for 1995. ~! Welfare reform means equipping families to earn their own way and become productive, tax-paying citizens. That has been TAP's primary goal through three ~ decades. TAP is and always has been welfare reform. That has been and will continue to be TAP's contract with the Roanoke Valley. Living in the Roanoke Valley for most of us is a wonderful life. That wonderful life has in no small way been the result of TAP's impact on the 11 jurisdictions in this Southwest Virginia service area. Edwin R. Feinour, an investment counselor in Roanoke, is a member of TAP's board of directors. ~a ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ' "~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for February 28, 1995. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: (1) An ordinance to rezone a portion of 1.242 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to expand the existing building, located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Joseph A. Quesenberry. (2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Towers Inc. (3 ) An ordinance to rezone 7.17 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct a townhome project, located northwest of the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wimmer Real Estate Network Inc. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~S OFFICE. E~ {-f I-3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for February 28, 1995. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, --~ M~ (j~~ r 4 Y ~'~~ ~ r Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote ~,/ No Yes Abs i COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 ~ . Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 L For staff use on/y v date re rued: received 2 L) a ficati n fe ~ PC/BZ dat Fi 2 placard~is - BOS da e: _ .~~ Case Number: ~~ eck type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE C7 VARIANCE Applicant's name: Joseph A. Quesenberry T/A Virginia Pool Sales & Ser~~e; 774-5992 Address: 4347 Old Cave Spring Rd SW Roanoke, Va. Zip Code: 24018 Owner's name: JOSEPH A. QUESENBERRY Phone: 774-5992 Address: 4347 Old Cave Spring Rd SW Roanoke, Va. Zip Code: 24018 Location of property: ~ Tax Map Number: 76-20-1-I+~ ~~ 4347 Old Cave Spring Rd Sid Roanoke, Va. .24018 Magisterial District: Windsor Hills Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel {s): Existing Zoning: C2~~ 1.242 .acres Existing Land Use: Business/Retail/Service/Office sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: Same C2 ~~ srahr use o~/y Proposed Land Use: Use Type: Add Business (2) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? _ YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO X ............................ ... ty g ................... Variance of Section(s) _ N/A of the Roanoke Coun Zonin Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v ~ Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~ . Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and cencanr n/ sha nwno. Owner's Signature: ~~ / . For Staff Use Only: Case Number f ~" Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. I Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Remove existing proffered conditions and allow full C-2 zoning. Adjoining property are existing businesses including services. Public health will not be affected. Safety .will not be affected. Roadway & intersection are adequate for an additional small business. General Welfare will not be affected. I Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The area was set by Roanoke County as a core area, for small business & residential combined. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Will not affect adjoining properties or surrounding area, public service and facilities. Existing 8" water line at property presently. Ezisi:irig ;gas line and sewer Additional, more business will increase county tax revenue. Area presently landscaped for business additional with C1 rear area. ~ \ .` ~ ~ \ ~ \ '~ \ ~ 11113 .~ .\ ~~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .` ~\ ~ \ - ( \ iT ~ o~ X092.5 ~ •\ _ - ; ~` __ 1 -~~ ~o92•S I ~ ~ \\ 11 2~iT,r y\\~~-@. \ ~,.\ ~" - ~, -..~ 2 107 SA:~T~. ~, z 1/ ~ ~\\ ~~ \\ ~~ 2 - 2 ply" ~ \ ~ ~~ ~ `, ~ ~ y\ \ ` Exlsnno \~ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \\ ® \\ ~ ~ \\ \ ~e9 ~ \ ~\Z;, j '~ ' ~. \ \ ~ ' \ 'f- _; ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ \ ~ ~~ . ` ~ ~`\ ~ .tom : ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~,n 5, C.> O O • ~ ~ \ Asa 4'Y~, `\ ~\ -~`' - - - - x..,. 1112 Il-o Ila 8 \1.06 r. J 1 log. tto2 E '' 1t00 i -098 M~-- 096 4~', l09¢ a I ~ __. ~YtSTIt•aG ~. \ ~ [ice -\ \ ~ y,M~nY Stv.tQ s ~ ~ I . ~ \ \ ~ _~ ~~ .. \` \\ ~ ~` OM~H ' x ~, ~ - ~ ~~ `\ ~- ~°' 1 v~ ~- -^ ~` '1"i I 1 i ~ ,~ E ,.~ .; ~ - \ ,- ~ ,.' . • _ I ~ ~-~-~ NORTH ~ ,~ ..,,o.~a ,~~ I Y.ii o ! ~ h . ~ /~ '~ ` OS\ to ' Y' 10.1 p R~~~p~ G~ 4.aca ~~~ Av e \ \ ~ i ° Sin ~ y~~++.. Rr. 1639 ~ ~ Ki ~xa.o 9 a.R"I ~ xs~ 9~ • ~ J.T/! ` \ • i' SA 8 ~ J213 ~, ~S x3 J '~ !a II N 1 lJir t ' ~ 12 ~`aa~ `ro I4 57At ~' ~ • / ~\\ ` LISAe C _ 1 ' C` ~ Rf. ~g37 •• '~• 1 IS 16 1JrJ ~ ` •.` ` 1~.1 ~ / 1JiJ O 1Jrr ' ~ 1J2r 1J0! ~. . - 1333 1321 a a' s~ q .~ aa' ~ i f ~ ~ \ \. oo p~ ,~. s' ~, 1663 i 15 ` ` -. i•te• ~ asu iox.a• e ~ 2 ..,, ~ .,: 'S ~!/r oti "° ~ ~ ~ S3 «~.. ;may ~ _ 1 ~ s o 7 ~~ . 110 ~A ^• ns» x`14 ~ ~ I901 - -0 S G~l• p°• is J ~•1 ~•~ai L'rOAt `~~., 11r~ " . • te• 12 2_i ~ ~,. 11~ + ~ . 1 ~» = ~ ,•~ C _ Z a~.s iJ ~ 1d/7 ,jy ~ >o ..sa w ^ n ~ 1!2! 7 t3 tl09 11/O tr g - .~^ La~• ~~ .. 1!!f 9 ~ ~ ' 3 2 0 • ^ - Sonr9 - O - • ilzi Caps ~+'^ ~ ~° ' G. ~ 6J7AC -. ~ _ R4 X652 / ~ ~ .• ~~ ~~ / ~ r>as ~ .Z 19 ~ ..~ g F - / q<,tZ O 18 ~ t91o 31932 - 1621 T /.. ~ 1130 g tT2/ :a S 13 AcIDl rA -.. .. ao za ` ~. ?i .P 389AC:C1 / ~- ~ 1323 ~, I ~ ,~~ 15/j/ LaeAc tot - ~ 9 _ L61AClC1 ~'~- r, 1726 eu xa 1333 ~n~h~` / '~ .ti .. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNII~'G JOSEPH P.. QUESENPERRY T/A VA POOL SALES ~ SERVIC AND ZONING C-2 CONDITIONAL TO C-2 ~..o~ ROANp~~ ~ aZ ra3s UTILITY DEPARTMENT January 10, 1995 Mr. Joseph A. Quensenberry 4347 Old Cave Spring Road Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Availability No. 95-1 4347 Old Cave Spring Road Tax Map No. 76.20-1-13 Water/Sewer Dear Mr,, Quesenberry: Public water and sanitary sewer are currently provided to this property at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road, Tax Map No. 76.20-1-13. The current water service to this property is provided by a 5/8 inch water service. At the point of connection to the public water main, the water pressure is approximately 135 pounds per square inch (psi). Your plumber should adhere to the plumbing code requirements relative to water pressure. Sanitary sewer service is also currently provided to this property. Since this is a commercial facility, you will need to complete and submit a non-residential checklist (enclosed) prior to plan approval and install a sampling manhole on the sewer lateral. If you require additional or increased services to this facility, you should address them under the site development process for additional comments and fees from this department. Relocation of the existing services may be billed on a time and materials basis. If you have any questions or need additional clarification of the above information, call me. Sincerely., • ~~ ._ {~ Robert C. Fronk Utility Engineer mh Enclosure c: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 • (703) 387-6104 ® Printed on Recycled Paper COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only G~ date rec rued j ' Z Z 1Ct qC / / received y• (,(J" applicati f ee: ~'yC `"' PC/BZA date: 7. 9~ placards issued: BOS dat ' 8 9S Case Number: ~ "r Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: VIRGINIA TOWERS, ID?C. Phone: Address: P. O. Box 1110 6 Zip Code: 2 4 5 0 6 L nchbur Virginia 24506 Owner's name: J . MORRIS CRUMPACKER, JAMES N CRUMPACKER, J~hone: Address: JEAN C BROWN and DEBRA C . MOORE Zip Code: 2 4 019 Location of property: Tax Map Number: part of 39 .00-1 See Attached Schedule Magisterial District: Community Planning Area: ~j Size of parcel (s): Approx. 8 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: AG-3 Existing Land Use: Agriculture/Rural Preserve District ' Proposed Zoning: Special Use Permit Proposed Land Use: Broadcast Tower ........................... For staff use on~y Use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requesteJd district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 "concept plan Application fee Application ~~~~: Metes and bounds description `i~< Proffers, if applicable Justification s~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~ /C ~~ Owner's Signature: Virginia Towers , I??c . ~Y = ~R~ - ~7 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furhers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Petitioner's request is for a use recognized in the AG/3 agricultural/rural preserve district. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Your applicant believes that its request will further the intent and purposes of the County's comprehensive plan in that the property will be used in a manner consistent with the adjacent property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/se~Ner, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. r.. It is anticipated that there will be little, if any impact on the adjoining properties as the facility will be unmanned, only requiring occasional visits by technical staff. ' Virginia Towers, Inc. ~ . Applicant DEC - 1 5- 9 4 T H U 1 1 2 1 J R 8 C O R P- J~ 8 D I S T 1y~ j~~N~ ISit7U utuJ Vr.l ONyv •••• ~i e N y N M Y N y N .n-~...+ OYE~IJ1L.t,. $TF~IGTW~ 2.39 ~ 80.4 ftJ 118E . 713.23 a (23.40.0 !t) Af~4S1.. P 1 0 .r-~~ I ~~ ~pp~ F'~1 Antenna <--{~ Contar o! Radiation 2i.3e ^ ( 70.! !fib 118E ' 3 i3. 4 A! (~ • 2 ~ t) HART North Labitu~fe 37--20~QB -- sits Elav 888.8lS s a280.o tt) 111RgL iisst Lor+pibudd (~c~e ~t~inot drawtlrt aY ~le~. o e (1302.8 ttf J1119i. YEf~TYCAL PL..AN SMETCH $#~ ~YA'1'ION B89 A (?2$0 !t) A-!8L TQp t3F 8'7'~t.~CtLtA~ " A .713 m t33~0 ft A1~1S1_ F7~1 Antanna G4A 710 a X2330 tt) Af4~L 313 e1 ta027 !t) tfAA7 F"Y6~JR~-S paW'~fl7 T~0 NEAREST METF.A ~CfO'fl . ~XHIBiT ~#~ AMENO BMPH-g307~eXZ SUSAN D. BRAWN WADJ AAOIO STATION C}# 2QaC3 - ~.5 KILOWATTS l~CANQKE. VIF3GiNIA Auquat i93~ G ~~acr~, ~iv~. $YtOA~C~.ST Tf±~GL ~ON3ULTAN1's M GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN 8c DARBY 200 FIRST CA~SPBELL SQUARE POST OFFICE BOX 2887 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24001 (703) 224-8000 FAX(703)224-8050 MARYELLEN F. GOODLATTE Direct Dial (703) 224-8018 December 21, 1994 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Janet Scheid Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Application for Special Use Permit: Virginia Towers, Inc. J Dear Janet: Enclosed please find an application for a special use permit on behalf of our client, Virginia Towers, Inc. Enclosed with the application is a metes and bounds description and plat of that portion of the 236 acre tract atop Read Mountain which is the subject of this special use permit application. Attached as a concept plan is the technical sketch of the broadcast tower. The application fee of $40 as well as the list of adjacent property owners (Roanoke County and Botetourt County) are also attached. The application seeks permission to build and operate an 80 foot broadcast tower on the property. If allowed, radio stations WRDJ and WJJS will use the tower to transmit their signals. During our consultation, you requested additional details on the tower. In response to your questions, I have spoken with Keith Putbrese, the corporation's attorney coordinating its FCC/FAA application as well as Russ Brown, the operations manager of the radio stations, both of whom have technical expertise. They have advised that the antenna on the tower will not protrude above the tower height (80 feet) but will be contained within a circular tube along the side of the tower. It will be located on a platform below the top of the tower. The height of the antenna will be about three feet. There will be a second antenna which will serve as a studio- to-transmitter link which will be placed on a small platform at approximately tree height on the tower. GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN BC DARBY ~.,~. Ms. Janet Scheid December 21, 1994 Page 2 That antenna will be located in a small square structure, approximately 2 to 2-1/2 feet alongside the tower. Thus the unsightly appendages which can accompany other types of transmitting towers (dishes atop cellular broadcasting towers, e.g.) will not be present. The tower itself will be self supporting and will not require any supporting wires. There will be a small outbuilding adjacent to the tower to house the transmitter. Access to the site will be through other property of Mr. Crumpacker. Virginia Towers expects to submit a subdivision plat for review and approval of the appropriate Roanoke County officials. Virginia Towers will be working with T. P. Parker & Son in this process. We understand that the Planning Commission would expect to visit the site on the afternoon of Tuesday, February 7 between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. Currently, access to the site has been afforded by an adjacent property owner who has permitted Virginia Tower representatives use of his road. That private road is gated and Virginia Tower must secure the permission from the owner in advance. We will contact that owner prior to February 7 to seek permission for the Commission and its staff to view the site. As you plan the Commission's schedule that afternoon, knowing a more precise time between the hours of 3:00 and 5:00 that day would help making the arrangements with our neighbor easier. Please let me know if you require any further information in support of this application. We appreciate your assistance. Very truly yours, ~~ zc~.t~c-~-- Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:jry:3039000 Enclosure cc: Virginia Towers, Inc. w/enc. Mr. J. Morris Crumpacker w/enc. Keith Putbrese, Esq. w/enc. .r 4 i ~ ~4 ~'~ O ~° ~ y`gcp ROANOK~ C > NTY 621 t ~ E FER ST TE ' ~ ~ C gea~con N A ~~r;vurioN ca (V ~ ~16 /.~ ~ x2ooo 1094 A.B.'bICK~~~,.-...~. ~_ ~ ,• ::~::~::r VICINITY MAP \~ 0 3s.os 'n ~ zar (K` City d na^^.. 4 µ_~ NORTN ~.._ ~~+ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA'G VIRGINIA TOWERS AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT .~•' .,, COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZO ING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 ' ~~ Roanoke, VA 24018 (7031 772-2068 FAX (7031 772-2030 For staff use only da ,/ received by: !rL ~ appli u PC/BZ p BOS d e: Cas Numb r: ~ /~~ -+ ~/ ------ •:r; - -- - - --- - - Check type of application filed (check all that apply); ® REZONING ~ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Wim~ner Real E's~ate Network, Inc. ~~ -t Phone: ggg-7298 Address: 401 .Cleveland Avenue, Vinton, VA /~~ Zip Code: 2,4179 Owner's name: Mary Be I l e Schaa f f Phone: Address: P. O. Box 216, Vinton, VA Zip Code:24179 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 2401 Temple Drive NW 71.07-1-26 71 .07-1-27 , , Feather Road Vi Magisterial District: Vinton ' nton, VA 24179 ~~ Community Planning Area: Wes, Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: {~ ~ acres Existing Land Use: Vacan sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: R3 •Foi.sraff.usa.only.•.... Proposed Land Use: Deve I opment - Cond i t i ona I use Type: .....................j....... Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district. YES _ X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES x NO .:#~: Variance of Section(s) .of the Roanoke County.Zoning.Ordinance.in..order.to:.. Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESc ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws ~ ws v ws v X Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 11 "concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description X Proffers, if applicable Justification X .. Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the properly or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge an consent of the owner. ~, / ~ Owner's Signature: ~'r(. lJ (~~ Foi Staff Use Only: Case Number ~~-~ ~-~.~`: l~.'1rFF ~Q. ~~ ..1k1;, .~-iEilx3`.. ,F,:,-w~,fF~t~l,..•~~~:.~.G~!Y«~~E~~~~c~ - }~:.: Applicant Wirrrrier Real Estate Network, Inc. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following -- questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classit~cation in the zoning ordinance. The request will allow a piece of property in the Vinton Magesterial District to be developed fora townhome project for the elderly, a need that is presently existing in the valley. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The development of the property for the townhome project conforms to the comprehensive plan designation for the property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The development of the property will have little, if any, impact on the utilities, public services and facilities, road and other services provided by the County. ' LAW OFFICES AGEE ~*- ~ OSTERHOUDT. FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON £~ , A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT 191~J ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W. TELEPHONE MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON P. O. BOX 200G8 703-774-1197 EDWARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON ROANOKE. VIRGINIA FAX NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703-774-p96t 2dO18 MARK D. KIDO ELLEN KUO December 22, 1994 Mr. Terry Harrington Director of Planning County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: Wimmer Real Estate Network, Inc. - Rezoning Dear Terry: Enclosed please find the Application and supporting documents for a rezoning Petition which we are filing on behalf of Wimmer Real Estate Network, Inc. I appreciate the opportunity of talking about this with you at an earlier time. As you know, this project is a 41 unit cluster townhome project for the elderly. Individual lots will be sold, but, as of this date, the subdivision of the lots has not been completed. Further, the concept plan may need some slight revisions, but we wanted to have it filed in time to make the February Planning Commission meeting. It is my understanding that the Planning Commission will meet on February 7 to consider this matter. In addition to the Rezoning, you will note that the application calls for a special use permit. I believe this is appropriate for the type of development Mr. Wimmer is proposing. I have submitted one application indicating both rezoning and special use permit. I did this after conversations with staff members Tuesday afternoon in your absence. We have included a check in the amount of $900.00 which includes $860.00 for the rezoning ($660.00 + $25.00 per acre) plus a $40.00 special use permit application. I appreciate your cooperation in filing this application. Should you need anything further, please let me know. With best personal regards, I am, Very truly yours, ~~~~ ~~y Edward A. Natt EAN/sse Enclosures pc: William M. Wimmer 401 Cleveland Avenue Vinton, VA 24179 ~3 ~,~5, VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,- VIRGINIA IN RE: REZONING AND SPECIAL USE APPLICATION OF WINNER REAL ESTATE NETWORK, INC. TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~}-3 COMES NOW Mary Belle Schaaff, Owner, and Wimmer Real Estate Network, Inc., Contract Purchaser, and hereby voluntarily proffer the following condition relative to the rezoning of 7.17 acres identified as tax map number 71.07-1-26 and 71.07-1-27: 1. That the subject property will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Peter E. Lawrie, A.I.A. under date of December 21, 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Respectfully submitted this o~. ~ day of ~~P~~ , 1994. Respectfully Submitted, Mary elle Schaaff WINNER REAL ESTATE NETWORK, INC. BY C-l.J.~~L~~.Ct->-,'C ~ [~(J.C/n(~rca~t William M. Wimmer OSTERNDUDT, FERGUSDN, NATT, ANERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 e:\wp50\steph\wimner.Pro:ssel2/22/94 ~~ w~ ~~~ ~ ~ APPL I CAT l ON FOR REZON I N+ ~ ga_ 82~ ~~, ~''~~ ~~ R--1 TO R-3 • i g1 • ~ yJ, ~. TT" ~ ~, ~~~ ~~• APPLICANT NAME & DEVEI.OPMEP i'`'`- ~ ~ WILLIAM M . W I MMER ~ ~'~ ~~ , , - " FEATHERS GARDEN UNIT ~~H~~ ~ ~ o ~, 544a Q • FT , < ,~ `~ ~° ~ ~'~; USTER TOWNHOUSE FUTUR~ } ., ~, : - ~~ ~ ~• 1 UN l T C~ I GHT 4 UN I Ts ~ . ~ ~. ,, ONE TO TWO STORY HE " ~' PHASE 1 UNITS A & B I ,. S~~ - ,, ~ ~ PHASE 2 UNITS C,D,H, L -' ~c~ . ~A , =, yo ° ~~ ~~~ ~o , . ~c PHASE 3 UN I TS G & ' ~ ~,~ ~ -' ~ : ~ ~ 7.17 ACRES S~ ' ' ~ - ... , ~~ ~ ' ' ~, ' ~ N 'l ' ~ , ,, 60'xldd' ` 5440 SQ. FT,I .. ~~y~, ~~o .~ ~q.. W` ' 9f. ` s 6~~~0 cf ~ PARKING ~ . : , ~ ~ `~~ ool ~ • , • , M{IN. 2 / UNIT \, ~'~ ~ ~ TYP. '~~ .d. } ~ ; ~ ~~~ ' '~\ \~ G UNIT ~~p~~ N! ._~ 1140• ~ ~~~ ~~~~ 60'x 150' { ~ ' $160 SQ. FT. ~'. ~- \~~~ ~~ F~' EX~.L~P~k+~P~ ~ •.. ,.~ .+G I • • AREA LANDSCAPED 1160 ' `\~•\ ~~~p~4 ~~, " ~ h ~' .~ ~~ _ , UNIT .. E.. { . ' -```-' TR r ~: • ~ ~~ 60' x 140' . ' `~ " 5440 SQ . FT . I -----•~.~._ RETA I ~ ~~ ~ • ,; ~ ~,, ~ - r ~ ~~~ 1• i Q - i r...r ~ . D I • • • . ' .~ EXIST . OUS t,y ~~ .~ ENTRANCE ,~ -ENT. y r ~T • ° R'f . 1030 ~\~ ----b' HATER----------~FIR& }{~ptWiTw - _ .._... ..._. - - - _ ........_.., ...~... _... - - _......-. ___.__...-,._..-- .~ UNIT "F" 312' ~, CONCEPT PLAN 540 SQp'FT. PREPARED BY, PETI=R E. I.AWRIE A.I.A. _ _ BR ! STOt,, YA. 1221 ~9 4 . _ •!~'\(...:.1'•;.•.4:...x•, ;`..~F~•' y, 1~ .~ •... ' .`~'~ ~ •, .:.~~'~:;'••;i•L;)r%;~' '•4:'Q'•-+~•~••'%• ~• .:a J •~'•I. y••• '„•. 4: ` 1• w`,l •i ~ .,:'' ,•I •'` '<~'••!•".. ::.` 'f):'i7 •'Y .~"!+.!':':'tlr.f ~. ~. •. r" ~.:~.tir~:;G "1 Yi ', A.: ~ r :~, ,••;~ . ....•: ~Y . a. ~' .• .rl ~ ~• ., t.:,i~• •I.^. r .1•• . ~ • M r M. .' I{. i'. • i. p •.. J ~ . •,, ...•x ••1 ~ 1 `. ~ `.t •S.y1.~r :_.,•~~-~-i: ~;~,~ ~•• iV., L~..f~'t'i}.Y...I.Y~~ ,'. {r'`~~7~/v. ii• ~. „a 4.\; :*v',~%~y r•,•i. .,~r• ~i '• .{' i_. •jt,.:-;" Q•,r~• r, ~t~ •l ~ti)• •::•:'~''..il ~~1~N, ~j : \•_~: .~,,::, is ,' `` ~••'.:*..~ ~~ '<,•1.• \ ~'y- ~ ~: '•+\,`'~.(~::~~ ',:' :. c, ~~ `~ Y .~ • • •'~.' , y,. . ~ . ~,. . 'r 9 r:r... 'r.' '\~I T' • ,`x]!1'2 ~, J r "~.•~• i `' ' < ~^, 1 ' - I' , • ~V , • '~•' (i•• •• . ~' , • t `~~1•, .. ~ • ~ ~ • .. 1 • ~', .. .. •''~. •/~ .. 'i: • . ~ . •, , .• ~J ' ~t- ~:l ~• •ti 1 r •' h• ~. •. •' ~ N 1 :v. ;fir •.( t•~ . ~,~ :~,''~ 'fI,'w•~;~' i J: ,..:tiF: •~ ~, :• titer. y~~•~ .. .`~.'~ ... :. .e4 ~?..• ..;!~•-. e •t: .:. •...• ~;~T-;. .~~ ~.. 1.',. ~ ~'~•}'. : .• : ~i •' ~~:5"••:. i ~ ,~.9•= ••I_ ..', .1 .1~'l•' i ;'. ,~•.~..v;~ 7er''i...• }~..:.. ~ 1. p`~+~:1. ,•7 :+r .rr_: 77 .7 I: .~/. 4i ."r''~•.~. ~'Y~T•/ ~~.'• ~~ ''r, •:~':,'1•:. V'p.i ;~..••~~ ~"••7:~:~ ••~{,!u }:i\7••:I•~ t •'~ .. '• '!••'i» F.+~ a` .. is ,a .. . ~% .. •:• . "; • .:; .. .. ~~• t ~~, r `~~. r~••''~ ~.1 .C~'il •x,71•' .1'•f • '•y' . ,;~• -~.• {t M~ • ~~ .I` • ~,, ••J •, ti: •. .~'! '~:' )l;~. '' Vii. '~ •n. { . iy ,\ 1 a • { :. a \~ is ~ .'• '. p. ., +1.•.w 11 • ti r~. _: y,. `~ ~ .. t''•"..`~'. • 'J. ~•~"^ ' ~. •1:~,'.1 ~J~; •' 'ri,, • ,.1 ...~;; ': s.ji ~' , /. . i •wy:' `• .'~, ~, r,+,fr1:'+. -,.~ ~•, ~„~ ~:,. ;N ...'~s'a. v4J...r•J.'... ~''t '~~'~• iy•~ ,' •.. fir. ~ •1•;i. • .w . ~-~ •, 5 , ... . :` , ' ..' li ..";i ~~ ~ • . ; ~~' 117 ;v q •' i• ~..._ . ~= . ` , ~ • , : , /. .\ .` \- ~ •' "~ ' ;~~ •~J 1 , ~ ~•. 1, • f ~ + ` . S' ~ ; ~•~ '~• •~~ r'~l~ a +fy ;ref a~.1 .. •, ~.. ... ~z.? '1• I ~,•~+••• :; ,. •. •~ -. a..i ... ~+ r ./T•. ~ /~ ,; .i ~~..~~, •/' .~, , ~ ',1,' it •. • \. ~'..' •. ~.~ :ti ~t ''•' ~: ,;: .~ '~ ••~."!'w:,v 1y: .:'{ate. •.. ' .•'•~ 4. ~ . / ~ •~ , r1~•1~~ yam`. •\ ,•'' ``•,• '''~:M.r~ V 'r~'`• `~ y'' . ,~.. ~ : , ., N_ A ~ N-3 NORTH • ~ 1 ~~ ~ . ~, ' ,~=~ \ ~~' Lx24 ' ~ r 29. \ I .92 ae ~~ 29 /~ }~, 2100 12.nac 1.19 A. /~ ~ /~~ 1 ~- L~oae ?e 31 ,~-r 7.gac \^ ~ 9 I \ {p~ ? !.. Mop 71-00 4xz4 t ~ ~, f ~~! 300 ~ ' ~ I•• 400' ~1 %~ / ` • v c. o 43. ae ' iya, 3 c` am b ! 4 O 400 ~~i a ~• I.Nae G~ ,a ~ ~ ~l 9$ ~ 2.76Ae ~ ~4 2D ulAO 1el ~ r s ue,~la a ~a, !. 24QD 3.97 a< i "° ° 9' a° aw ~~ t ~`er f • ern..r to ~ tree i7~9 aril rw O1O w T n.s Rye T.mpl9 ~Dnr9 ea 1030 q, w,, ~j ~f .I b LLo1 M.Ir~r Liv MLNA- y0~ ~~M/~ „ . 6 YO !0 ~ v~ Lrl .fit L/J 9 ~~/([~ CD eJ~ 3!6 ,~ zsz a a ~ ~ ~ aq .~ r $~f ~~ ~ e ~ • .• ~' a.u I 14.1 ~ s I4 ~ P g: .~ ~ ;~ j g~ p ~ ` _ ...~1 /9G. "~ ` I . _ _ _ __ 1 9. _~ - g ~ s J l- _ A~ * DEPARTI~NT OF PILANNIA'G ~TIMMER REAL ESTATE NETWORK Z ~' AND ZONING R-1 TO R-3 r,. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (TAX MAP NOS. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) AND KNOWN AS THE OLD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OFFICES AND ANNEX LOCATED AT 510 AND 526 COLLEGE AVENUE, SALEM, VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~ ay~'~-+"~~\ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of real estate located in the City of Salem (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) located at 510 and 526 College Avenue, Salem, Virginia and known as the Old County School Board Offices and Annex. BACKGROUND' The County School Board of Roanoke County has declared this property to be surplus by resolution adopted January 12, 1995. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, now desires to declare this property to be surplus and available for sale to the public. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County Administrator has received an offer to purchase this surplus property. Adoption of this ordinance at first reading commences the process to notify the public of the proposed sale of this public property, to solicit other bids or offers for this property, and to satisfy legal requirements for the lawful conveyance of this property. In accordance with County policy the identity of the offeror and the amount of the offer shall not be disclosed until the second reading. Offers shall be accepted until 4:00 p.m., February 10, I ~ . 1995, in the office of the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT• Funds received from the sale of this property will be deposited into the Capital Projects Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adoption at first reading of an ordinance authorizing the sale of the old County School Board Offices and Annex. Respectfully submitted, ~~ r ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote l No Yes Abs realestschoolbd.rpt z-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE AN CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (TAX MAP NOS. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7) AND KNOWN AS THE OLD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OFFICES AND ANNEX LOCATED AT 510 AND 526 COLLEGE AVENUE, SALEM, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County School Board of Roanoke County has declared this property to be surplus property by resolution adopted January 12, 1995; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and is being made available for public sale; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on January 24, 1995; and a second reading was held on February 14, 1995 concerning the sale and disposition of a certain parcels of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the old County School Board Offices and Annex (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7); and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of to purchase this property for is hereby accepted; and 4. That all net proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as s-. are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. c\wp51 \agenda\realesta\schoolbd.ord r AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-3 AIITHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS NEAR SPRING HOLLOW FOR THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Utility Department is developing and constructing the new water treatment facility on property owned by the Board of Supervisors, said property being located near Spring Hollow, in the Catawba District, on Virginia Secondary Route 821; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead transmission line or lines across the property to provide electric service for the facility, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading was held on January 24, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power r Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's water treatment facility. 3. That donation of a right-of-way for an overhead transmission line or lines, and related improvements, across the water treatment facility site, to provide electric service for the facility, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized subject to the County reserving the right to continue to use the proposed easement area for the necessary drainage facilities. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections MAP SECT. 3780-296C 8 296D 138KV CLfJVERDALE/ MATT FUNK LINE L ~~ ~xrna~sEO r POL£ -~ 296-60.38 \' \. PROPOSED -~ POL E 296-6037 25r. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PFrt7P0.SE0 - POLE 296-4027 X/ST. ft9LE5 d L/NES 296 C 296 D I EX/ST. FILES d LINES / ~ / KUMIS / SUBSTA. SITE j ~~ JN. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, V I RGI N I A T. D. 6 6 5 000 CATAWBA DISTRICT nercuen rw r.+a oru ovevr ~ nnr r~ n. ~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NEAR SPRING HOLLOW FOR THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of an easement to Appalachian Power Company (APCO) for an overhead electric service line(s) across the water treatment plant property for electric service to the new facility. BACKGROUND' The Roanoke County Utility Department is in the process of developing and constructing the new water treatment facility on property owned by the Board of Supervisors. The site is located near Spring Hollow, in the Catawba District, on Virginia Secondary Route 821. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Installation of transmission lines and related improvements is necessary to provide electric service to the facility. Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for the overhead electric line(s) as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. Utility Department staff, having met with an APCO representative on the property, and having reviewed the proposed agreement and plat, has approved the location of the easement subject to the County reserving the right to continue to use the proposed easement area for the necessary drainage facilities. FISCAL IMPACTS' Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. r ~~ I ALTERNATIVES: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for donation of the electric service line(s) easement as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #1. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huf an Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix MAP SECT. 3780- 296 C 8. 296 D '. e I } 13BKV GLC~VERDALE/ MATT FUNK LINE L ~~ PRnx~sED POLE 296-60.38 PROPOSED ' POL E 296'-6037 25'" BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PROPOSED POLE 2.96'-4027 X/ST. POLES d LINES E .~ ~ KUMIS / SUBSTA. SITE ~ ~ ¢~ ~ ~P. COUNTY OF' ROANOKE, V I RGI N I A T. D. 6 6 5 000 CATAWBA DISTRICT X/ST. Ft~LES cf L1NE5 296 G 296 D APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY ROANOKE VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION T8, D. DEPARTMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DRAWN BY L,M,A. DATE OCT. 25, 1994 APP. BY J. B. A. III SCALE 1~~-2~~~F SHEET I OF~_SHEETS DRAWING NO. R -3083 DIETZGEN 179 M7 f,1D 49.19f ~1~~ it 11 ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NEAR SPRING HOLLOW FOR THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Utility Department is developing and constructing the new water treatment facility on property owned by the Board of Supervisors, said property being located near Spring Hollow, in the Catawba District, on Virginia Secondary Route 821; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead transmission line or lines across the property to provide electric service for the facility, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading was held on January 24, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power ~~ 1 Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's water treatment facility. 3. That donation of a right-of-way for an overhead transmission line or lines, and related improvements, ..across the water treatment facility site, to provide electric service for the facility, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3083, dated October 25, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized subject to the County reserving the right to continue to use the proposed easement area for the necessary drainage facilities. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. r + J --°^ _+- AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THS ROANORB COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-4 AIITHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF ROANORB COIINTY~S INTEREST IN CERTAIN -REAL ESTATE (REGIONAL SANITARY LANDFILL) TO THE ROANORE VALLEY RESOIIRCE AIITHORITY, SIIBJECTING RAID PROPBRTY TO CERTAIN PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, AND CERTAIN OTHER PROVISIONS WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke by agreement dated July 29, 1975, agreed to acquire approximately 257.08 acres of real estate located on State Route 618 (Rutrough Road) for the operation of a regional sanitary landfill; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provided that upon the full utilization of the real estate for landfill purposes, said real estate might be maintained and operated as a regional recreational facility or area for the citizens of the City, Town and County; and, WHEREAS, the City, County, and Town have created the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) to address the solid waste disposal needs of the Roanoke Valley, and the RVRA has developed a new solid waste disposal facility at Smith Gap to replace the old sanitary landfill on Rutrough Road; and, WHEREAS, the RVRA has undertaken the closure and post-closure responsibilities of the old sanitary landfill on behalf of the City, Town, and County; and, WHEREAS, the City, County and Town have encouraged the establishment and construction of an extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park, said extension being designed to cross 1 a portion of this real estate; and, WHEREAS, the City, County and Town desire to convey their respective interests in said real estate to the RVRA, to subject said real estate to certain protective covenants limiting the use of said real estate to park, recreational and open space purposes, and to request the RVRA to cooperate with the Department of Interior in the establishment and construction of the extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That there is hereby authorized the declaration of certain protective covenants limiting the use of approximately 257.08 acres of real estate located on State Route 618 (the "Property") to park, recreational and open space purposes, in connection with an extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway and Explore Park. That this Declaration of Protective Covenants shall be substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit "A". 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading was held on January 24, 1995, concerning disposition of a 257.08-acre parcel of real estate known as the Roanoke Regional Landfill; and 2 4. That the conveyance of an easement over a portion of the Property, said easement consisting of 89.964 acres, to the United States of America, Department of Interior, for the location, construction and maintenance of a spur road of the Blue Ridge Parkway, said conveyance having been previously authorized by this Board by the adoption of Ordinance 91394-4 is hereby ratified and confirmed. 5. That the conveyance by Special Warranty deed of the County's 31.2 undivided interest in the Property to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is hereby authorized and approved. 6. That the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is hereby requested to cooperate with the Department of Interior in the establishment and construction of the extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park. 7. That this conveyance by the County is subject to the Councils of the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton authorizing similar actions on behalf of the City and Town, respectively. 8. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance and to effectuate these transactions, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to mail a certified copy of this ordinance to the Mayors for the Councils of the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: 3 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gardner Smith, Chairman, RVRA John R. Hubbard, Executive Director, RVRA The Honorable David S. Bowers, Mayor, City of Roanoke The Honorable Charles R. Hill, Mayor, Town of Vinton Dr. Rupert Cutler, Virginia Explore Park Gary Everhardt, Superintendent, Blue Ridge Parkway 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL ESTATE (REGIONAL SANITARY LANDFILL) TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY, SUBJECTING SAID PROPERTY TO CERTAIN PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, AND CERTAIN OTHER PROVISIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval of this item which will convey ownership of the old' landfill to the new Roanoke Palley Resource Authority. In doing so, I am asking that a deadline be established for the conveyance of that portion to the Department of the Interior for the construction of a Parkway spur to Explore. The RVRA can probably do this within 60-90 days so June 1 might be an acceptable deadline. This will make it clear to RVRA the intent and expectations of the governing bodies. We cannot risk losing the federal funds for this road. EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY This ordinance conveys Roanoke County's undivided 31.2 interest in the regional sanitary landfill located on State Route 618 (Rutrough Road) to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA); imposes certain protective covenants on said property; and requests the RVRA to cooperate with the United States Department of the Interior in the establishment of the Blue Ridge Parkway extension for the Explore Project. BACKGROUND• In 1975 Roanoke City, Town of Vinton, and Roanoke County agreed to acquire real estate for the operation of a regional sanitary landfill. This real estate consisted of approximately 257.08 acres located on State Route 618 (Rutrough Road). This agreement provided that upon full utilization of the real estate for landfill purposes, the property could then be used as a regional recreational facility or area for the citizens of the City, Town, and County. With the opening of the new regional sanitary disposal facility at Smith Gap, and upon the closure of the old sanitary landfill, the City, Town, and County have requested and the RVRA has agreed to be responsible for closure and post-closure activities at this site. 1 T- The City, County, and Town have supported the construction of a spur road for the Blue Ridge Parkway as an integral part of the establishment of the Explore Park. The United States, through the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service, has requested the conveyance of an easement over a portion of this property to it for this extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park and that the use of the remainder of this property be limited to park, recreational, and open space purposes. On September 13, 1994, the Board adopted Ordinance 91394-4 which authorized the conveyance of the County's interest in a portion of this real estate, 89.964 acres, to the United States of America for an easement for road purposes. The proposed ordinance reaffirms this earlier action; amends this earlier action by subjecting the entire property to certain protective covenants; and it expands the scope of this action by authorizing the conveyance of the County's interest in the entire landfill property consisting of 257.08 acres to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. It is anticipated that this recommendation will expedite the construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Spur road. If this ordinance is approved by the County, City, and Town, then the following sequence of actions will occur: 1) recordation of the protective covenants; 2) deed of easement of 89.964 acres to United States of America, Department of Interior; and 3) deed conveying 257.08 acres (subject to 89.964 acre easement) to Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This ordinance shall accomplish three purposes: 1) authorize subjecting this real estate to certain protective covenants limiting the use of this real estate to park, recreational, and open space purposes; and 2) authorize the conveyance of the County's interest in this real estate to the RVRA; 3) request the RVRA to cooperate with the Department of the Interior in the establishment and construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway extension across this real estate to the Explore Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. 2 sa Respectfully submitted, ~,. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix realest.landfill.124 3 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL ESTATE (REGIONAL SANITARY LANDFILL) TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY, SUBJECTING SAID PROPERTY TO CERTAIN PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, AND CERTAIN OTHER PROVISIONS WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke by agreement dated July 29, 1975, agreed to acquire approximately 257.08 acres of real estate located on State Route 618 (Rutrough Road) for the operation of a regional sanitary landfill; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provided that upon the full utilization of the real estate for landfill purposes, said real estate might be maintained and operated as a regional recreational facility or area for the citizens of the City, Town and County; and, WHEREAS, the City, County, and Town have created the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (RVRA) to address the solid waste disposal needs of the Roanoke Valley, and the RVRA has developed a new solid waste disposal facility at Smith Gap to replace the old sanitary landfill on Rutrough Road; and, WHEREAS, the RVRA has undertaken the closure and post-closure responsibilities of the old sanitary landfill on behalf of the City, Town, and County; and, WHEREAS, the City, County and Town have encouraged the establishment and construction of an extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park, said extension being designed to cross 1 ~~ a portion of this real estate; and, WHEREAS, the City, County and Town desire to convey their respective interests in said real estate to the RVRA, to subject said real estate to certain protective covenants limiting the use of said real estate to park, recreational and open space purposes, and to request the RVRA to cooperate with the Department of Interior in the establishment and construction of the extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That there is hereby authorized the declaration of certain protective covenants limiting the use of approximately 257.08 acres of real estate located on State Route 618 (the "Property") to park, recreational and open space purposes, in connection with an extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway and Explore Park. That this Declaration of Protective Covenants shall be substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit "A". 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading was held on January 24, 1995, concerning disposition of a 257.08-acre parcel of real estate known as the Roanoke Regional Landfill; and 2 ~A~ 4. That the conveyance of an easement over a portion of the Property, said easement consisting of 89.964 acres, to the United States of America, Department of Interior, for the location, construction and maintenance of a spur road of the Blue Ridge Parkway, said conveyance having been previously authorized by this Board by the adoption of Ordinance 91394-4 is hereby ratified and confirmed. 5. That the conveyance by Special Warranty deed of the County's 31.2% undivided interest in the Property to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is hereby authorized and approved. 6. That the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority is hereby requested to cooperate with the Department of Interior in the establishment and construction of the extension of the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Explore Park. 7. That this conveyance by the County is subject to the Councils of the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton authorizing similar actions on behalf of the City and Town, respectively. 8. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance and to effectuate these transactions, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to mail a certified copy of this ordinance to the Mayors for the Councils of the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton. realest\landfill.ord 3 r AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-5 AIITHORIZING THE ACQIIIBITION OF A PERMANENT BANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FROM STRANNA L. ARTHIIR, LYLE M. ARTHIIR, AND PATRICIA A. HOLT IN CONNECTION WITH THE OLDEN CENTER PROPERTY WHEREAS, in order to connect with existing sanitary sewer lines serving the area and to provide adequate service to the site commonly known as the Ogden Center property, it is necessary to acquire a sanitary sewer easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20~ Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from the property owners for the sum of $700.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the second reading was held on January 24, 1995. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt a permanent 20' sanitary sewer easement, as shown on the plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $700.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the capital projects fund. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections I '~ ~ \ v1~ ~Q ~Q~ ~ \\\ er'a' _' y ` O f~ ~ N rn a ~ ~ o_ y~\ `''~\ ~ ~ yG ~ Z 1 ~ n. O X Q / ~ ~s ~'° ~ ~.C OZ \~ ti = `sue. s / N 05'39'38" W \ o .~~ ~, ~'.• `' • '" i'? 34.93' \ ~ ~ • ~i' ; i :•` • ~ Q w cFn ~ z O X p ~ ~ ~ S~ W U (~ !\ IJ_I OHW / ~~ F- OHW ~ ~ ~ u'6, Q p U O 1 ago / ~ ~\ p ~ p .'/ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 \ ~ ~ PROPERTY OF ~ ~ a ~ x m ,~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE w 0~~ TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 ~ O ~.,~ ~ D.B. 197, PG. 119 = D.B. 86, PG. 307 D.B. 13, PG. 340 ~ TH OF SF. /Ij \ ~ ,~~~ r 6~ \ / ~ RANK B. CALDWE II 9 ~ O ~" \ ~ ~' No. 1335 \ ~ ~ x{04 NOTES: \ 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF EASEMENT PLAT FOR DEEDS, PLATS & CALCULATED INFO AND FIELD TIES TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE NORELA ON TOSTHENBOUNDARIESSTMEST SHOWING A NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT A COMPLETE & ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SUBJECT PROPERTIES. ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 N.B. JW-87 DRAWN DAP TPP&S T' P' PnRKER & SON SCALE: 1"= 50' ele acule~nra DATE: DEC. 5, 1994 CALC. DAP ENGINEERS CHK'D SURVEYORS Pcet ofri00 aOZ 39 D- (~I (~CFn. PLANNERS 9elem, Vir((laia 24163 1~I r1 q~-~_;1~ 173 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~'.- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FROM STRANNA L. ARTHUR, LYLE M. ARTHUR, AND PATRICIA A. HOLT IN CONNECTION WITH THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~, /~ ~,,~~,~~ cr"'y ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of a permanent easement for sanitary sewer purposes in connection with the Ogden Center property. BACKGROUND• On December 13, 1994, the Board of Supervisors declared a certain parcel of real estate commonly known as the Ogden Center property as surplus, and authorized the sale of said property to PM Properties, Inc. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to connect with the existing lines serving the area and to provide adequate sanitary sewer service to the site, it is necessary to acquire a sanitary sewer easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt. Staff has negotiated with the property owners for purchase of the necessary easement for the sum of $700.00, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. The easement to be acquired is more particularly described as follows: A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, twenty feet (20') in width, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, monitor, maintain, and repair or replace a SANITARY SEWER line(s), system, facilities and related T3 improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantors, acquired by deed dated July 16, 1990, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1326, page 1981, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12. The location of said easement is shown and designated as "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" upon the plat dated December 5, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, said plat being attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. FISCAL IMPACTS' The purchase price of $700.00 for the sanitary sewer easement would be paid from the capital projects fund. ALTERNATIVES' Alternative Number 1: Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing purchase of a sanitary sewer easement from Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt, for the sum of $700.00. Alternative Number 2: Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance and direct staff to initiate eminent domain proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative Number 1. Respectfully submitted, Vickie Hu an Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs ~~ ~ \ ~~ -~~ .~ N s ~ a -~~ 2 ~~-o ~ 0 2 G~ ~ <~ ~~~ ~ ~ O y~\ `'m\ ~ j yG 1 ~ .'/ / < / / `~ ~ ~ ~ . / ~' ~- ~ Qw ~ J Z ~ Q = N Z Q c~ ~ z~ F~ xw w cn W H Q _o O ~ ono o cn ° i~ ~ Q r' ~ N d ~ r O o p o~ ~oZ a ~ xo Q w~ Z O 2 TH OF j'l.. ~ • ~ ~\?6~ \ / / ~ / ~ ~ RANK a. CALDWELL. I~l I a ~~ O~O~,~• \ \ ~ ro ~' No. 1335 \ ~/ `-' S Dec 9~- ~~~ ~ ~~,~ ~ ~ s~v~°a NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS & CALCULATED INFO AND EASEMENT PLAT FOR FIELD TIES TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO COUNTY OF R OAN OK E NO RELA ON TOSTH~NBOUNDARIESS THES T SHOWING A NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT A COMPLETE & ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA tP .>~ 1 rn d a' a, N N J W J s 1~ ti 1 sue. ~O `Sv'. ~ ~~ '~~ ~. ~ O. !,_ Qo o'er o (n ° I ~ Q ~a (V Q. ~ ^ O ~ ~ O~ ~oZ a ~ m xo W Z O 2 05'39'38" W 34.93 'i~• 'ii' '• . `~ ~' j ~ ~'~~~'~ ~ o w oy /y ~ ~y5 ! ~ ~/~ 5 5 QO ~ ~ C~ Fm ~~ °s;_ w v \ Z > i\ / ~ ~~' i ~ gs~ c~` ~ ~ °~r °a. S / ~ ~ ~ PROPERTY OF ~ ~,~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE O~~ TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 O ~,,~ ~ D.B. 197, PG. 119 ~ D.B. 86, PG. 307 ~ G D.B. 13, PG. 340 ~9 c~F\ ~ / ~ ~~ S F ti \ TAX N0. //•15-U1-11 T. P. PARKER & SON N.B. JW-87 DRAWN DAP 8tcl 819 Houlevnrd EN OINEERS CALC. DAP CHK'D SURVEYORS Poet Ottlce Hox 98 ~.I n~Fn, PLANNERS 3nlam, VSrQinSn 24163 SCALE: 1"= 50' DATE:_ DEC. 5, 1994 D- u~ ~ . Ga_1.'i1 ~ 173 ~-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FROM STRANNA L. ARTHUR, LYLE M. ARTHUR, AND PATRICIA A. HOLT IN CONNECTION WITH THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY WHEREAS, in order to connect with existing sanitary sewer lines serving the area and to provide adequate service to the site commonly known as the Ogden Center property, it is necessary to acquire a sanitary sewer easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from the property owners for the sum of $700.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the second reading was held on January 24, 1995. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt a permanent 20' sanitary sewer easement, as shown on the plat ~~~ entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $700.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the capital projects fund. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. 1 k.' .M AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINIBTRATION CENTER, TIIEBDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-6 AIITHORIZING THE ACQIIISITION OF A PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FROM HONEYWOOD A88OCIATEB IN CONNECTION WITH THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY WHEREAS, in order to connect with existing sanitary sewer lines serving the area and to provide adequate service to the site commonly known as the Ogden Center property, it is necessary to acquire a sanitary sewer easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Honeywood Associates, a Virginia Limited Partnership, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is shown and designated on a plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from the property owner for the sum of $1.00; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the second reading was held on January 24, 1995. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Honeywood Associates, a Virginia limited partnership, a permanent 20' sanitary sewer easement, as shown on the plat entitled "Easement Plat for County of Roanoke Showing A New 20' i Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, together with a temporary construction easement, for the sum of $1.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the capital projects fund. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt Roanoke County cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering 7'0''x' ~n, Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors Attorney & Inspections ~ \ \ ~ Q o ~ -y -0 2 U rn ~' ~ ~ ~1 ~ ,~ O ~ ado ~ \ ~ Z to ~ -off ~~ N o (~ ,n c~ o ~ ~ ~ ~a c~ \~\ wa~3y<~ ~~ rn ~ ~Q~~; oy 2 c~`ro~ ~~~ N ~ ~ `'', ~ ~ z ~ a ~ s\ \ ~ O_ 2 ~ ~~~'s N 05'39'38" W / ~ ~ tea' s ~' 34.93' x 1 ~ oy ~ ~ ~ ~~~~y 5~ ~ o / . ,' ~ \ '~ ~ ~ 59 ~ 0 w ~ C~ 1~ ~ Z \ N~ ~y,_ W U OHW ~ / NNW _~W ~ J Z ~ Q= NZ Q C~ ~ Z~ F~ X W W Ul Q _O O ~ ono 0 ~Q~n°. a D ~o °oz~ a ~ xo w Z O ,TS OF L. s C ?~ / ~ / RANK B. CALDWE I~11 .'v ~~ ~O ~~~' \ \ / . ~' No. 1335 ' ~ ~~ ` ~ ~,~~,'~~ S DES 9¢ ~ \ ~'~ ~ ~y~ot~ NOTES: \ 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS & CALCULATED INFO AND EASEMENT PLAT FOR FIELD TIES TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO COUNTY OF R OAN OKE NO RELA ON TOSTHENBOUNDARIESS TH S T SHOWING A NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT A COMPLETE & ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SUBJECT PROPERTIES. ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 2 > >\ ~~ . / ~ ~ ~6's / ~ Qy\ ~^ •/ ~ ~ ~\ / \ ~\ °s ~~ ~ ~ \ s / ~ ~ ~ PROPERTY OF '~ \„~ ,/ ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE \\ O~J` TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 ~,~,, ~ D.B. 197, PG. 119 a~ L ~Gl \~ ~ D.B. 83, PG. 340 ~ yy ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 SCALE: 1"= 50' N.B. JW-87 DRAWN DAP TPP&S T' P' PnRr~R & SON DEC. 5, 1994 EN OINEER3 B18 BOUlltetd DATE: CALC. DAP CHK'D StJRVEYOR3 Post Otrioe Boz 99 D_ rl n~Fn. PLANNERS S61Em, Vi!'Qinla 24165 tAl (~ . q^.-~.~17 J~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FROM HONEYWOOD ASSOCIATES IN CONNECTION WITH THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~ J~~-,~„` ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize acquisition of a permanent easement for sanitary sewer purposes in connection with the Ogden Center property. BACKGROUND• On December 13, 1994, the Board of Supervisors declared a certain parcel of real estate commonly known as the Ogden Center property as surplus, and authorized the sale of said property to PM Properties, Inc. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to connect with the existing lines serving the area and to provide adequate sanitary sewer service to the site, it is necessary to acquire a sanitary sewer easement upon, over, under and across property owned by Honeywood Associates, a Virginia limited partnership. Staff has negotiated with the property owner for purchase of the necessary easement for the sum of $1.00, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. The easement to be acquired is more particularly described as follows: A perpetual RIGHT and EASEMENT, twenty feet (20') in width, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, monitor, maintain, and repair or replace a SANITARY SEWER line(s), system, facilities and related ~~ improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantor, acquired by deed dated September 13, 1978, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1102, page 849, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10. The location of said easement is shown and designated as "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" upon the plat dated December 5, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, said plat being attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. TOGETHER WITH a temporary construction easement, ten feet (10') in width, along the northeast side of the entire sanitary sewer easement designated on the above-described plat as "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" extending across the property of Stranna L. Arthur, et als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the property of the Grantor (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10), for use as a temporary access and work space and to allow for necessary grading during construction, reconstruction, repair, or replacement of the sanitary sewer facilities or related improvements. FISCAL IMPACTS' The purchase price of $1.00 for the sanitary sewer easement would be paid from the capital projects fund. ALTERNATIVES' Alternative Number 1: Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing purchase of a sanitary sewer easement from Honeywood Associates for the sum of $1.00. Alternative Number 2: Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance in accordance with Alternative Number 1. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. uffm Assistant County Attorney ~~ I Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs ~ Q ~ Q -yam ~ ~ W O o0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a 1 ~ ~ x ~~ ass ,o'; ~C ~ ~ a ~ Q o / ~ a~~~ ~s. ~~ a ~ ~ ~~ 1 Z ~ 06,s ~ O ~~ ~~ Z = s~ N 05'39'38" W ~o ~`~' 34.93 l A~. ,i~/ I'/,,,, ~ Q W y~ i~+~/ ~ y~oo ~ ~ N Q 0 1 ~ ~ z ~ ? Oy,~ wU N~ ~~, 1 f dl`s 2 w ~ / ~~ ~ / s~ ~ oN`~ ~ \ ~ ~6'e U o ~ ~ ~ rn 9s~ ~ W O I ~ ~ / ~ ~` ~ ~ .'/ ~ ~ oo~ ~ aoZ S ~ ~ ~ PROPERTY OF '~ ~ x o ,~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE z O~~ TAX N0. 77.15-01-11 ~ O ~,,~ ~ D.B. 197, PG. 119 = D.B. 86, PG. 307 D.B. 13, PG. 340 ~ S,TH OF sF ~, ~ i ,~,~. ,~\~6 ~ , RANK B. CALDWE II is ~~~ Off/ ~~~' \ \ \ / / 6 ~' No. 1335 ~, \ ~ 4 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. 2. METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS & CALCULATED INFO AND EASEMENT PLAT FOR FIELD TIES TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO COUNTY OF R OAN OKE WO RELA ON TOSTHENBOUNDARIESS THES T SHOWING A NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT A COMPLETE & ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA N.B. JW-87 . - _ _. DAP TPP&S T. P. PARKER & SON at;ALt: l =-~u - DRAWN els Boulevard DATE:~DEC. 5, 19945, 1994 CALC. DAP EN OINEERs CHK'D SURVEYORS Poet Offloe Boz 9B D- ITS ~.~ nS~n, PLANNERS Salem, V1rQiala 24163 del r1 4~-~ 31~ S4 Sanitary Sewer Easement" dated December 5, 1994, together with a temporary construction easement, for the sum of $1.00. 2. That the purchase price shall be paid out of the capital projects fund. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. A-12495-7 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~.. ~'~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 14, 1994 SUBJECT: Nominations to Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and Southwest Development Financing, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Four-year term of Arthur B. Whittaker, Sr. will expire on February 10, 1995. Mr. Whittaker was appointed on October 10, 1994 to complete the unexpired portion of the four-year term of H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix. 2. Southwest Development Financing, Inc. Two-year term of Timothy W. Gubala, Economic Development Director, expired on January 12, 1995. Mr. Gubala has indicated his willingness to serve another term. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Brenda J. Holton Elmer C. Hodge Detiuty Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: ~1) H. Odell Minnix No Yes Absent Denied ( ) nominated Arthur B. Whittaker Eddy x Received ( ) to serve four-year term on Johnson x Referred ( ) Roanoke Regional Airport Kohinke x To ( ) Commission; (2) Bob L Johnson Minnix x cc: nominated Timothy W. Gubala Nickens _ to serve two-year term on Southwest Development Financing, Inc (3) Bob L. Johnson motion to add above File nominations to consent agenda at next meeting Roanoke Regional Airport Commission File Southwest Development Financing, Inc. File x r ~/-~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 RESOLIITION 12495-8 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 24, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for January 3, 1995. 2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Knights Booster Club. 3. Request for Appropriation of $7,236 to School Operating Budget for Purchase of Electronic Reference Materials for Secondary School Library Media Centers. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Huntridge, Section 3. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~~~~.rc~ ~~ir-i Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Bingo/Raffle File Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections S January 3, 1995 1 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 3, 1995 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the organizational meeting and the 3rd day of January, 1995. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddy called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee B. Eddy, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, H. Odell Minnix, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Supervisor Harry C. Nickens. The January 3, 1995 3 ?. Length of Term for Chairman and vi h i ce C a rman Supervisor Kohinke moved that terms shall run from January 3, 1995 to January 2, 1996. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. Resolution establishinc Bvlaws. Rules of Order and Schedule for Board Meetincis in 1995. R-1395-1 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the prepared resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 1395-1 ESTABLISHING A MEETING SCHEDIILE FOR THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1995 AND ADOPTING RIILES OF PROCEDIIRE FOR SIICH MEETING BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That for calendar year 1995, the regular meetings of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are set forth below with public hearings scheduled for 7:00 o~clock p.m. unless otherwise advertised. Regular meetings will be held at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive. Monday, January 9, 1995 at 12:30 Noon Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council at Highland Park School Tuesday, January 10, 1995, at 3:00 p.m. Friday, Saturday, January 20, 21, 1995, at 8:30 a.m. January 3, 1995 5 a. that no second to motions shall be required in order to consider that motion; and b. that the chairman may make motions, participate in debate and vote on all matters considered by the Board. c. that no amendment or addition to the printed agenda be permitted unless approved by unanimous vote of all Board members present, unless requested by the County Administrator or the County Attorney as a matter requiring immediate attention. This provision applies to Main Motions and shall not apply to Privileged Motions, Subsidiary Motions, Incidental Motions, or Motions That Bring a Question Again Before the Board. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: OLD BIISINESS 1. Rest for Aooroval of Bingo Permit for Calendar Year 1995 from the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 (CONTINIIED FROM DECEMBER 13, 1994) A-1395-2 Supervisor Minnix explained that he requested that this item be added so that the Moose Lodge could continue their Bingo games if the Board approves the permit. County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that the Lodge's audit had been provided with the Board Report. Jennings Byrd, Attorney for the Moose Lodge, was January 3, 1995 7 Legislators who were present for this meeting were Delegates A. Victor Thomas, H. Morgan Griffith, and Clifton A. Woodrum, and State Senators Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo, and J. Brandon Bell. Constitutional Officers attending were Sheriff Gerald Holt, Clerk of Circuit Court Steven McGraw, Treasurer Alfred Anderson, Commissioner of the Revenue Wayne Compton and Commonwealth's Attorney Skip Burkart. Mr. Mahoney presented the County's legislative program as follows: ROANORE COIINTY LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR 1995 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY LAW ENFORCEMENT Restore funding for HB 599 Program (State aid to localities with police departments) - Fiscal Impact to Roanoke County - $57,550 FRINGE BENEFITS FOR CONSTITIITIONAL OFFICERS Restore funding for constitutional officers'salary fringe benefits for Fiscal Year 1996 - Fiscal Impact to Roanoke County - $371,241 EDIICATION Enhance funding for public education; authorize local school divisions to establish opening dates for school; base disparity funding on composite index and locality~s local tax effort in support of education TRANSPORTATION MIISEIIM Support continued funding of Transportation Museum in Roanoke City VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AIITHORITY Support continued funding of Explore Park VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EBTENSION Restoration of $2,898,000 to 1995-96 budget for Virginia Cooperative Extension and Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station January 3, 1995 9 the three percent retirement increase for current and future retirees was essentially an unfunded mandate. Sheriff Gerald Holt spoke in support of continued funding of fringe benefits for Constitutional Officers. Commissioner of the Revenue Wayne Compton informed the legislators that 75$ of the BPOL tax comes from out of the state from such companies as Kroger, Sears and J. C. Penney's. IN RE: EBECIITIVE SESSION At 10:50 a.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (A) (7) for consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff pertaining to actual or probably litigation: City of Roanoke Water Claim. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLIITION R-1395-3 At 11:10 a.m., Supervisor Eddy moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 1395-3 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to January 3, 1995 11 Submitted by: Approved by: Mary H. Allen H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Clerk to the Board Chairman `~. A-12495-8.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit and 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 from the Cave Spring Knights Booster Club COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Cave Spring Knights Booster Club has requested a permit to hold a raffle on February 10, 1995, and 50/50 raffles in Roanoke County on the dates listed in the application during the calendar year 1995. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit and 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ACT: Approved (x) Motion Denied ( ) motion Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED BY: ~~ ` Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------- LON VOTE by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent to approve Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle Permit File RAFFLE PG::MIT APPLdCATION ~-a Application is hereby made for a ~:affle game permit. This application is made subjecf. to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, ar that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and. by Section 4-86 et. sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit , ~'he Board has silty days from the f ilinq of an application to grant ~r deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with caainty and state law. Name of Organization Mailing Address C~ tJ ~ 1z-1'r C ~ U City, State, Zip Code ~y(~ ~(~, kph ~ ~ (~~~ r~a ._-. When was the organization C'ounded? ?•( 1~~ Purpose and Type of Organize wion ~ ~ ~~~~~~ , ~~ ~e-;~ e ~~ t~, c~v~ ~ rR b~ ~ r ~~ z r.~II . , Has the orga~izaton be`~n in existence in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YE3~ NO Is the organization no u•~-~r .•f it? YE8 / NO Is the organiz,atioh°exE•apt uEader $501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YEB~ NO ~^2.~ ~ D ~ ~j i 1 ~ I _ ~ /- ©5 Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle ordinance or section 18.2- 340.10 et. seQ• of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may bye guilty of a felony? Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts gad disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such xP^ords ¢r~ subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Rera..~:~? l,(,~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGIlVIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF 1'HE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 .° Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to • enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to $ 18.2-340.13 of the Coda of virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for t e purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Raffles ? ~~ ti ~ ~ 'rye ri V DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: dates raffles will be held. , ~.. 1~' l~u-~ ~' ~,~~~:. ~~ C~l~l:~r~ ~'l1 -(~>1~i.!~ bra ~ C~~rl I't i,~'~. ~ ~ ~ ,. ., _, 1.1x.. ~~~ ~ ~~ {'1„ ~ ~'l.k l ~ ~ G~~-rY1~~ . 1 ~~ Article Descriptiop, Fair Marke Value ~--- _ ~ n '~ ~," /' f DATE OF RAFFLE ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' j ~'~{~!Z ~~ ~ - ~~~ `- If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list be~htiw all Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? r ~~ ' ~ NOTE: T is p rm' shall be va~l only for the above location. ~~ R Any organization holding a permit to aonduat bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5$) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically haw the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~(~, Qr~ ~+ n ~ ra.15-~- mon ~~ C~r~S-~rt1c~ ~~1~ ~}-~.c~. ~n S C~~ ~~-- ~~ ~ mot. ~ ~ rn-~Y t ~.h ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF TIiF ~~VENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 2 Officers of the Organization: .~ . President : ~ Y~,1 ~ ~ 4y-1~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-` Address: (s1 ~ ~~-~ U..~~ l iF~ f~C'J' Vice President : ~~ C1 ' % ~ i Yl_`. Address : ~"(~~ ~ ~~ (~~ `'` f ~~ ~'} Phone: ~~ ~~ ~~~~~- ~ ~ ~-~S,,Z~'~ ~ N~ n V~~ Phone : ~ . f ~ ~:tZ ,~ ~ ~ ~ - ~,~?l ~I ~~ \J ~~^-.K._ ~ ~ ~~. ~ v 1 ~ r~ I Secretary : ~ ~ Y I ~ ~ ;~ C' Phone : ~~ ~"~~~, j Address: `~ ~i ~ ~_ l'~ u~ ~ '~ C;7h~~ ~~~~ z--'~(-~C --. ~ Treasurer : ~ ~ C~~ ~~ ~. ~-' ~~i ~' ~ ~~.f:-~ Phone : ~~ `I ~ ~~ (~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ f~ J (u ~~ Address: ~j (~'~ (1% ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~`~-~~ ~~ ~~~'~~~- ~'~' 1 ~'~~ Member authoris/~ed to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name : Q. (,~. '~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ per/ Home Address-' ~~~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~/"' ,~¢~~, Phone ~~~ ~~ ~l~ Bus Phone ~~ ~' Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceasesg to exist: Name : ~ C ~~'~. ~-~' C~ ~.-'~,~-~ \~_{ ~ Home Address ~ (Q ~ ~ ~ ~' Q ~5~~'~' 1'~~ Y ~~ ~ `~ ~~ Phone ~~ ~ `t~ - V ~ ~ Bus Phone L) ~:".-~ - =~(~~~ ~~ Does your organisation understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? Has your organization attached a aheak for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke?_~~ IF ALL QOEBTIONB.HAVE BEEN ANBWERED~ PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 . ~ NOTARIZATION ''""~ " THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST HE TAKEN HY ALL APPLICANTS: L'"~p"`~ r I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in s18.2-434 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached aopiea of Bea. 18.2-340.1 ~,., seQ• of the Code of Virginia sad 8eatioa 4-86 ~ aeQ• of the Roanoke County Code. signed by : ~,~~- v~2~4~ ~~ N e T eh ~_,t~(i-~ Home Add J~~-~~~"~~C-T",~ ess Z c~0/g subscribed and sworn before me, this day of 19~ in the county/.~itY of ~~ ~ -~~~--~'~ , Virginia. ~ y . , - >_~_-.MY commission expires:~~' ~ 19_~~ Notary P a NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having and issued to the applicant to this calendar year. Date ' J - ~J . ~> w. been found in due form, is approved have effect until December 31st of ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Commis ner of the evenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COIVIlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 ~~ Boys Basketball• January 24 January 31 February 10 February 14 Girls Basketball: February 1 February 8 February 11 Cave Spring High School Home Games 1995 JV/Varsitp Fr/JV/Var Fr/JV/Var Freshman JV/ Varsity JV/ Varsitp JV/ Varsitp Northside Franklin Co. Patrick Henry Franklin Co. Franklin Co. Wm Flemming Patrick Henry 6:00/ 7:30 4:30/6/7:30 4:30/6/7:30 4:30 6:00/ 7:30 6:00 / 7:30 6:00/ 7:30 e •'.. A-12495-8.b ACTION # ITEM NUMBER L- J MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the 1994-95 School Operating Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~ BACKGROUND: The Educational Technology Program Initiative of the Virginia Department of Education includes an appropriation of $500,000 during fiscal year 1994-95 for the purchase of electronic reference materials for each secondary school library media center in the Commonwealth. The amount allocated to each secondary school was determined using the school division's composite index. Roanoke County's allocation was $7,236. Acceptance of the funds does not require a local match by the school division. The allocation of $7,236 was electronically transferred to Roanoke County on December 16, 1994. The deadline for spending the funds is June 30, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None. No local match is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of the $7,236 to the 1994-95 School Operating Budget. Jerry Hardy,- erector Budget & Data Management Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ~S~ ~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to apurove VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance L-..3 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Educational Technology Program Initiative of the Virginia Department of Education includes funding during fiscal year 1994-95 for the purchase of electronic reference materials for each secondary school library media center in the Commonwealth, and WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has received $7,236; BE IT RESOLVED by said school board on motion of Jerry L. Canada and duly seconded that an appropriation of $7, 236 be made by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the School Operating Fund for 1994-95 to enable the purchase of electronic reference materials for each secondary school library media center in Roanoke County. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ~- ~G ~ Clerk .~ A-12495-8.c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER L"''7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Huntridge - Section 3 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Huntridge, Section 3, Roanoke County Land Venture, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker and Son entitled Huntridge, Section 3, dated September 1, 1994, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $67,500 and $88,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION° Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Huntridge, Section 3 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~-y SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob tson, P.E. Utility irector Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: ~~/ ~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to approve VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections *! L- "~ f'i~~f-1 f-f~ ~©_Cr~Mt~i'~iT' D,hIC"1 OCCTl;'NM~1VT Tr-ITC. i~t=~(j_ !li-ifr ('fF G~._ Ftvf~i`.iT fi,N`l dC~T, P~t~Gty~ _ Haan,: t,hic 1? r-ia?/ of ianliar•y. igQh nv an,•i hot,l.raan~ r~.rann'vG fr;!int,v I anti V~nr±ira hcroinaffi.~r r;?fnrrari of t I-•,a f i rc,t, na rt t,hG RndR('i r'lr CI i'vFG2VTCilGC, :', t= t, r, ac t,w~n Ilc`_.~pl;nnGl~_ far: ~r -- _ F7rl~N(lk~ ~';(11~i~iTV VT~(;•TP\iTfl_ i-?crain.aft.r• rarcrrari t,n ac i-,h~ k~a^rl." nar+. •,r of t,s-!.? c,arnrln nart.~ an.-i FIFhGG :" f-~~._~r('rC=~--- :;"~~._nt,.r ~.rim,nict.raT,nr nt Gn,annl.c ~~nirnty \/TRl;Tt\iTd,• narttj .f,f the this~ri Hart ini T T ~I l= G T I--i 71-IG,T Fi";G G,PJ^ TN ~'nr~!:7f1CRdTT~":rv of ti-,~ mrir _al npnpfirc t,,^ a ,:tire t.6~a 'lasrcin?~«.r ,7noc. Y?a%-~ht? ;Gb.NT i',n~! '~'`~ - d GTi;N ~t`Ji: ~Rt1!~IC~=s=R- i/~t.n t~:.= rn?rcr,antc ~-,f ^,~PJ~irQ SnrA.GRLI~ITV ''rF TTTi G in ~fGC: c-!r~;nip {in+.:.^ the kn,arri all water arri,~r c.j1,!pr ?incc };aivoc fittirlnc_ l,a-r-;-aic rnnna,-rinnc ct,^:rar,G ranilltiac ~,,irrac of ;.;Tatar .ciinnly, niimnc m nnr• ic~c ann ar;.f arm a ,, her anuinmar.~ am tharoirntn in anti t,~: ±ha water an:~t!nr r_Gwar cvc.tamc in tha ctrac.tc arfani.~c pnr I'1r'hl? . It"~ it`.~ Wat G."- ~ ,:'_'~ C-GlJG eta: Gn};tn'r a"GaC that l,a V;G rGG'i nr ma\f P'}G rRafTGr ~ ^, ~ S ,c ha }r.c.ta i Intl n; t'r ~ ~~c.;r„i;-na;• ~ ~ n;+ r., t } t.hn ` irYtt to nGr-nGr ~a 'v r G .anti ~r rin,.r tn,~ aacGn,antc in t.,hi^h, ~c c.~.,:.x rn-~~.• rte ~-~r,a? .:~! ?1` of .;I-;iri-, is mnrc na;~tir!rr..ri crtr-./n anr-i r1G .n~ri ~(,r+ -+cc~ :nat,a•7 ac ;' ,n;.rc_ ,+it• ~<~ chnl~~n ,--fin t,hp r,lar? ~sntit 1.~,~i i-rint!-lrzn,r~ - Cor'inn - rfatGr' n3r4~r• anrti Cnrt .anrl nn t~ lr~ the r~!-annt G C;~r7t~mnor 1 iQ~,d ;,,ari~_ h:. T ~ ~ . ~~vinrv FnryinaGrir?~ f;Gr}artmant H'anR { n~ J y ^~ L- ~ T,,.j i_}p~rclnnor ::-ina-_ ~-~prah.•,; ,~n~rcnant, anri warrant, t,nat, will ho rac.nnncihla +n>° t.rc nrnnor incfial atinn arr'1 rrncrri_,'-t.~,^r; r1f t.hp cam waT,cr ann,%nr caidar• c r tc~n;c, irr,!ii"iinn rpnair of .i_ir'a,^ca a,pac -~rartari by cat+lamp~^•t of ~,tility trap:^hac fr•,r a nprinrl of nna l t 1 vaar aftar riatc of ar,^antanr•a h\: t't^,c P,narrl anri ,.,ill nc,rrn~m an.: nor•acc.r\~ rcn~irc at itc -nct ~in~pr ~'• Nnr~r';c mint; dr1r: ~nictratr~:r of Rnannva !'niint\+ Ui~.-?i _.-.- :.... --. ,,._. ... ..,:..- n~a Hart ni• t,r,ra t.Fir;-~ na?~t,- haroh\,r inir~c, ,n t~r~ c;ar, t.inn -it t-hi,c inct,riimant to cinni*,r + ~ .. pia are^anfianrc ,~-r rnic ,^nn~r ar,~o n~:rc~~aar to Racr,l!it~f-~n Nn arnn'a:^I by t' a Rr~:arr of {ir,ar\r-cnrc of Rr.ai~nka r'n~int\r \lirn;nia I~TTP•.i'=SS TI-J~ +=i7I i ('~i~+~;~.;f c i n,\a+i,;•pc a;~rl cc,a l c lavalnnar• R;~•.annGo r:tir-,t I ra~~r~ \,!on' giro - - --~- - . = -- -- J KV' _ ~'__"~~~~4~ 'mod-~.~ .c. ^r do • Gr:,c i.~•lant . , C t -~, c n "- • N LAY ~ 1 ~+C,l~./ - (' ~~ ~ , t \ r ! f fi. \~ n f ~ ~~jlj.~1~^JkC~ t, n w i r - The fr,anrlinr~ ri~ari ~.!ac arG_nnt.!larinari hafr~:rp mc+ th~c.~ 13~ ~ a \, f7 - y,,i,,i,a~. _ _ j ~ ~7~,-, ,,. p ~ a q R•„- ac ~ I'l~~i\; aiithnri~arip;ffi:~npr~Titia nn har~a 1 f of - `VWl ~V^rl.i _~.V l~t~ __ "'v"L~kl~ -_Y__.v~ ~.t.~ -- ---- --- ~hea i ~, Rope.. _~ _ _ __ P,?~~rtarv s'3iihl i ^n tvi y f' nmm i c . i ~ n A Y Il l r a c • _ ~ ~~~(~.- -- --- -----_ .--- -- "" t1nrr;~~fcrl ac fi.n rns-m~ !^niinfi,ii Jriminict,rat,nr of s2r~~nnlrsa (`minty \/irninia f minty ~tTn~^nc~! Rv Fimcr I"' i-~nrirsc ci':~?G nf' ~'nlin'f'\//~!~lfil! nT'Tn Wli" the rnrcnrinrs -iac~rl wa,c ?rknn~,;lcrirrarl hafnrc me t,hic• rlav of 1 Q I~~u F Omar f._ 4-ir{-t'no_ i'r-z{int Q,ri„ ~nic _ra*,nr_ -,n nr~i~a1= n•F t.ho Rnprr! nr" Ciinpr~licn~c. of Rnann~c i"nnnfiv \iirnin?a ~ - - - - Nnt.~ rv Pt~hl ~ ~9t? ('n?nmiccinn cYni}~cc• Rc~/iccrl ifliyF,iQ(1 Danc ni= '2 ~-i County of Roanoke, Virginia i General Fund Unappropriated Balance Am n % of General Fund Expenditures Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $7,123,594 8.3% November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process (40,000) November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct (10,000) Designated for Dixie Caverns (2,250,000) January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements (92,000) Balance at January 10, 1995 $4,731,594 5.6% i• Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). i• m:finance\common\boazd\genera1.95 January 19, 1995 ~ -~-.. County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $ 29,835.86 Submittedy by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance • • m:\finance\common\boazd\capita1.95 v County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget $90,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill (50,000) August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road (10,000) September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway (1,000) October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan (20,000) January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study (3,000) Balance as of January 10, 1995 $6,000 Submitted by ~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance r~ m:\fifinance\common\board\continge.95 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -December 1994 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $1,611,331.19 Payroll: 12/2/94 $630,954.29 12/16/94 573 631.09 12/30/94 545,329.92 1,749,915.30 $3,361,246.49 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: .~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: F ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens E C O C O O O C wu V M d < ac .1.• e- - ? G r p g q R ry n? A ~ tt R }, R R A R R A 7 '7 7^ 4 7 i R M a~ T R ,^. A T R ~ tl R~ 8 8 6 R R F,^^. C C .. _ V M m 7 Cs m C 7 m ~rrr .r p P nt L 7 -»vU >uf a< C my >r< c u O A C C h V 4 O m K v 0 ~ e o -. ~ rf Ta7 V W C C 7 7 ~ O O . u < C 4 O• 6 L m v v A t y M x D O G 0 a s rc C z LL u m 7 C~ m f ma K C1 F 1 )~ ~ 1 I ~• 1 m 1 CT 1 LI 1 7 1 m 1 1 i I m 1 U 1 cl ~e 1 I ro I lD I I I I a 1 m I 7 I C 1 m I > I m 1 K I 1 I w i m I 7 I c 1 m I > I m I ~ I I I 1 r I m 1 U 1 LI 1 7 1 m 1 I 1 M c N t T r N L M L m. ri . f` to r to r _• N ~ ~o ~ O C .c r N N L f0 ~O < M l IT• tl .D v wr Ir N o< o< o c o c O 0 t0 C ~ r r1 a r 1 N N t .p ~ f 0 1i1 t cr~r T .O L 7 .O f uri • - .o r R N C T M ~ M r --~ c d N r- r o r tnN r v7 Mr M 7 vw- fT 0 0 < 0 o c 0 o c O O G Inv .O M m L a m ro a m o L ca O C 4 ~ O t ro L v ~ O a h n m L L o m c V V c m ~. a U .. M L a [ m ~, . N w t .. Q ~~ ~ ~+ ro E ~ C 7 •m n n_ a n nJM a 0 o c N M r c+ o . P Q Y M ~ N N v yo~oc ~ v r ^r-- N q~ N r MN fl N 4 Y T M a W N ~ fCl r- q N O q o ap N r- q~ o vo~ vlpn •O7M I~h h N 0 o c 0 o c 0 o e oulc ooc N.- q Invn x ro r 1- rt F T a. a x .+ U ro .. c 1- ~•+ 6 ~+ l a~~ m -+a- h L U u7mu -+ y c ~! N -~ V C lC O O 7 J U n7 o .- N N N N 0 o a N N r f0 J' < N ~ q/ o [ Q•O ` M T Ir m r oln r V M f •- O• r U1M poor 111 0 [' .O T ~ r mr 10 u In r fT 0 0 o c 0 o c 0 o c N o c r-unc V1P~ f a - m.. d lL m me C m .. u. J S x d ro .... 1 I~ u a ~o m L ~ m c > C L U L U C O d ro r i L O n ~ ~F- M ? u N N t 0 o c n a a ors • o N ~ P t N ~ 0 0 1 o tn. OHO C o M ~ N o . N N c q~ C Q C f•1 C ~O L T C N C ap c wu fo r N -. r 0 o c ooc 0 o c O O G w o V N1nq a m x 1 roZ i- c x t A 9 Y -- o of m K 1 a t C •+ a m m C U~+y ••+ O C J S 0 ~~ 1 r r Y .+ m a ••+ M M O e ~ 2 F b N q N N !1 ooc n n M N M W 0 ~ ~ va W va N N T v ti N M 't M N v o o N M va r- ut q+ N 111 ? M 0 0 0 0 0 0 11) o 111 N a m m u_ O L a r m C x O ro U F- I m 8 i L ~+ ~+ C O Q P o N M 0 0 n n ~~'S~ 1 M 7 r ~aD .oO P M ~ Ci r .v is I11r-r N fO~ ~ Ir n 1 M' N MCt r-Nr rroo 7 r-~ F (1 o w ~ -fnn lf~me N N ~ 7 0 o c 1'1oc 'U UIc tntic . cp .. c C z a bd (., r 7 I a r tl I m ~-• u a m ~ L r- I ro L e I L O C i V lL f. i w T V n c u i O ro 0 u O a C r m d O C ] L •+ d a sL ~ P M M 0 0 A R R o h 1 o •O 1 wf 7 I - N 1 un 1 N • ~~ M 1 N . - 7 l ~r r` . M l 111 f v. N ` ~O c r- r ~o c ~. M fT C P l' a V L • m 1 a o f L a L. a U O m U 1 m~•• a>- ~ L 1 m: elnq O L L I LL O f w ~ a 6 a L ~ m e C a l m L > 7 f m L 1 ~ U C N q ? R7 i 0 o c ro m • P ~O ~ O 1 N .o . n+N . ~)) un • fM O f f»tn• G+fi+ • ol-, M 7 l o ~ . +^ fCl l d O 1 N f fYJ 7 . N r o . 0 o r O O c o tn. ap Mt •O O i N M E m ro a m E 7 ro c L m O~ > o m L K 1 d ~ I a t ~ 7 f m O I L m I ro C Z L ~ f I N f i I ~ f na m E U f I ~ a l m .. f i [C L n O ~ V In u1 u 0 o c A T M M r m r• r N •Dr 7 M C 0 o L -<c W r~L wtnt UIN L N O~Ni O ~ . .-o. MiM M•O< •-NC v7 . r- u N - q~ r M - M 0 o M c O {11 C or-c 0 /0 U ITMV N 7 a M 1 f c k 1 I v 1 u a -oaf ro m - u a ~ .. C f L s u o n p x V m W .. a A ~ L c ~ m a I L C ~1 O L ~ 1I2(A7 Yo.-a ~ O.OK ~ o o c 7 7 N to c d) M c a fT 7 N T ~ o ~ ~ v - o N O c Mof' O 1/y co r N M a N q) N N c~ d) In .O o CO O .- o P to N .D N 7 v Q a m -~ U ro -. U > -~ L n L m c o In a P L m.. a I+ ~ ~ ro -• I U U L O m N d nl b C v < ~ m- L F L ro ~ 6 < l L ... - V M m L f O 3 4 iti tA~ 0 o q i 4 •0 0 1 N o M 1 N I M /-Ot M P i q)Vnr o ~ c ~D Q) C N M Q T ~ T < V N r M N r v r 7 c U N N o e N 7 stn. va f0 e O Q) L M u a 4 L1 U ~+ L a ~ 0 .. Iq a V O -+ C L +~ ou [A C m ~ A .C. U W I L L u I • m 1 L t n y V L O O t ~oNr fp o+ q ooc 7 R N !n r- M N 7 N r• N N N N N M M M N N 0 m f0 N e 7 N r 0 O I O Z 7 w J Q H O 7 1 71 i N ~; i M F 7 m i ~I W N N N F N N M v M p1 N F 0 T i CD N I ~ I I 7 to F ~ m J O F O 2 Q V ~c o r o \ o c W l~ V' F 4 a a c C N ! O ro L n 0 L as ac a' or ~ c ~ ro Y (TN 4 ~ d F ua > c c m - Ltr a1]C x E o ~ u C V a ro c o w I [C ~- UI F O d '< L C T ~ t ~ ~ C ~ _ 7 V < O C C V d 4 a ~ x U w w c O ti U a U N L V C 1 d f a- i w s A U n } .. ~~r z I N CC i ~ L 4 a l n s E r ~.. ur L ~ a c I L II F ~ U [ ! C F -w: l ~ J rn' L c I ml ~• I N Y I 7 I O L T L~ N ' C ' O >r 1 I - r- I I I d, U? [CI i ' I II e ~~ rn m ~ ~ - I cii ~~ M r c~ -r In ~ In r ._ ~ u I' ~r-o I i j N .-',qr- ! n ( .~ ((~ o ~ 'J r•1 i0 C N q ~ ~ N~ a+ -r '~,ln ' ' I .~ em , rU r? In c nJ I I OJ I ' r ~ i~ ra .- a c o c, .e r r- o t r- c• ' q t m Y I it N CJ '^ n- I R~ l c. o I d IP', fU I(D lioo q q'In M l , Ir1 -_ N .f .. u N nJ ! ~ r C~ o I ~ .n ul _ I^ ~ ~ ' O • .- N UT .l In r l 1 0 c ~o T .D tm ' ,~ I ~w I- ~ I 1 0 c ' r- c ,) 7 •. o N , O) CU 1 o m 1~ N 7 11 7 c• --~ I (~ 4+ N L N .-N-r N c ro N ,O 2 0 0 •+ L 0 a d se E ~ 1J F ~ --. o r9 .n U C ~ 2 L c a o u: u. m f y .-. 0i -r L ro O n L v ~a v C N U d -+ J~ (n w r o C -~ (+J rl F F r~ o F v v .o q r, In ~ OJ M r-I q Ul c+ W~ V1 N o M rl r? In D, -? -- (u r ~ - (n ,O N o 1 ~ ~, q I ~~ ~ E a: c ~ I~, ~E ii C L ~. a a > IC O L N a/ ro I ? In L ~ UI d !, L a C ~~ G ~ d 0 3 o UI C E V O O L E •• E IN O O ~ r., ocvl .- (d ,v n CU of In c m - op < r `, i I'1 ~, r ro u V 7 0 0 N 1 0 I I I' ~ I ~ I I'i ~+ '~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I I ~I i ~ ~ I , I II I ! I ', ,. III I ~I F o~ cl I '~. ~~I II ~ I. c. r-- o?I 'U Ol I i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I N 7 7J II ~~ I 7 ~t r~}i i, '~. I~~i i i i i ~~ I Ul ~ I ~ ~n M M~, i ? 111 { Ci q 0.i 7 q~ r- G '~, ~ I T lli Y I '.'I 1 ley q !n II ~ ~ n~ T R try r" 'r •-. i Y ~ I ~ I u? of rr ~ ~ of r- r .-- o ~ t ~ _ rn oJl of q ri r? I I~ (v ~' 7 G• rl tJ ~`i 7 1.1 r- CJ I Il u T - r- •- 7 I`r 7 ~ c 1~ T 7 (`-~ ~ 1'I ~-'~ r7 RJ ~D ~n lil 0 ~.'~ IPI r'1 ._ m' rn n L ~ J ~ ~ 1', aL ~^ rT Ifl pJ o"i tn. T fU ~ ~ Ifi r r- M ,^ U? T Ul til . 1; o v? -- r'1 -- OJ qy of ~ r, .- o] F~I c r, N , ._ .- of - ' -r -t '1 .- q ' r.l DJ r- q .- .n I .. J C' - i l ? ~ , -r ~ ~ f'J 1 - ~~ I r• o ' to ro r- I v c a .n r~J m' F r- c' o i 'I r? ru? cl c ul c rl o?c q r ±v r~!Uc ac. a r- ~er rl ~ m R, i =K m m- ~ K e n? , V f M r U~~ r", [C ~_ M r1 I Ul o r- G~ KI '- O c ,'t ~D ~ ~ (J o n r ~ n -- 1 N r- rl n~ c OJ ' rd n r-, ' r- 1 .n . m I, 1 rt ~ ~ ~. ~ li 1 ~ ,.~ pl q l11 -- 1 ~ r- • - n - _.~ - ~ -T I I I ._ 'I I p~ c r r1 v I I I n x, r~,~ ~ ~ a ~ [n OJ ~I r- ' 7 ~~I r c' rt Oi ! c: ? U'I 9J hl ~ U1 ~ ~~ ,L ~ c F t- ~ !- f- 1'1 ~'J 1 rl M ~ r- r? r- .o r- r r w to j n t - r .L u. -- r I _~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I i { I ~ I I I ~. r- 111 G1 G i Ul r- Jr - 7 F --J r- r ~ ~L •.. .p Sul Ki ` ~ (ii rn r` rn nJ 1 in n li~ ? .- `n - c, 1 i i , ( .- r- r- 'I .o q c o a0 c. -j -- TI q C .o n i CJ CJ - ~ M e'i c r ~ OJ 0.~ 4J o o? rl -~ 7 U? I ~. r? ri I~ M nJ - --~ r. ~ r1 ~ q _.. ~ , na q~ of i j.-.u-~n~ ~o q I :r~MnJa,'canJ q ~ 1 ~ In r c -. o'. o~ F R -~ , w r- o ry rl ui a o r- r-l ~ i ,c 'J r-'. I 1 'r r- Ul nl !'J h •r TI ll? r 1 Ol r, { _ .. ~ ~ ~ 1- a I ' -I (J to ni c n ro d r-1 ~ ! u? r1 u? r- of F V-I Ry o ~ -- . grlc G+ (' ~PI UI U1 ~t- rIN--U7 r'J 4,- u' rA ''. 11 c r`~ rl Y ~~J C ^7 ', 7 nJ pv r', .- ~ i M 01 rl I.1 ~~ (l t , n l ..J ~ ~. rl ~. U? -. I. U ~. ', I , '. ~ C ~ N ~ J1 _ [ i I I O ~ O ~ ~ ~ L .~ t to H ~~ rJ a ~ n ~ ~ a ~ r I L 'I i C , i „ U I •i ro I ~ ~ i N ~ I I ~~ ~ ~ I ~ I, y v c ~ In I y ~ -- 0. d a I C t- '~ L O a L 3 'I C ' a ro ~ , I O W L r7 ~ O r+ (fi M N '~ Z N U ro ^b . d -~ d L"U VI v n -~ u I rD 7 x U U r ro ~-+ a L ro a C .+ In ttl a ~ -' r, t c H -~ .. a .- 'I n. , u ~ n as daL ~n J v~ c c>~ ro u N C d 7 I In U~ E d 7 nl ro C O a [•i d a a 0 0 a ~~ C •J O N n Q+ d d ~> a 2 ~ rr a ~.. t~ i p ro L U S,' S V~ C+ ro Ci t I I, C' 'd r'1 ~ N N A Q~ L 'S ^) L ~• J .- L rr~ [/1 i N I, a L 6 o i 7~ -1 If d HJ •~ d ,. J a v~ o L .~ L 0. C1' L C ! ' C1 J7 a~ VI 7 L . a O C ~ ~, F a m C ro d ~ ~r r. Iti~ ca (~ ~ 91 7 7 r. n. ul q C O ,;+ ~- rl T I i n. 0o V~ oLl1yI[!to i clNo Olfl~ ~o Nr'1 V~ NNr"1Mq NN(`1~ 7 V [f~ I~ r•?r?r ~ ~ ~"~v I~r alto v?uiu' ~F I n o c-t, _ ._ =-1 0n I ~ o o mo o- i ~ n I ~I e _ • ,. N m 0 0 o o~ 0 0 W W f9 !- 4 Q a o p C O w L a 0 L as ao a~ 9 f' w C ~ +~ A R C OMLL L d F -+ Vw >cc w • L 4 dac Y E 0 7 Ir C U 4 w C O W 1 fr w M H O • 2 L C >. 7 s r N C-•- 7 ~ a O C C V b V a. xu W 4. c O d 7 v O L U OI N ~O S 0 CI v L O a • OC •. __ __ _° R R R R R 9 T 9 ~ a A ~I R A W 'i 7 7 7. 9 7 '~ ~~ ~^ 9 ^„ !1 x H ~ P a t 1# '„ 4' ^ C~. (~ -5 I v .- I ca o I d 8 r 1 a7~ b 1 x U OI 1 W C w V I W 7 1 q M N 1 F b w I }~ 1 ~ 1 d I L d 1 d u 1 a c 1 E w I 7 •-~ I U w I C m Ii d I'' c I u d 1 La 1 7 E I r 7 I .• U O 1 U C f 1 C W Y 1 d I •b 1 x I W 1 ab C U 1 •+ C 1 V w I cLl wal r e I h 7 I r U I 7 C I i O W 1 ~ N b 1 L I T 7 1 .~ r 1 L •• I r V I C C I O d I = a 1 x 1 W I I r 1 d I OI 1 al 7 I W 1 I 1 i ~D NUJN FNMaD yoMC0 I!1 In Op N o o M Moo1J1 In o u1 0 EDoNM In .o r MoMr• Ifl~~c NUJN r• ~oFl" .- ~O F C .O N w M RUIMU --Inr W N o R N N ~O~Mc f07~-u o IJI r- r M o N ~ N N aI - M .- w -. J! c 7w x a 1 L L O 0 r e w +~ L > r L N d ~ C O i 1 6 O I ~ r 1 Q I a •• O C 1 U O I ~. ~ r r C 7 w ~ (. r -• I w N L L •~ r a aulc. .. a o .~6Ut 0 0 0 < M 7 N ~ N N N J 0 0 o e N N N In O~ al N N ~O W M ~O a0 N i r- O~ N N In ~ ~O 0 i to r M v b C 0 r w d L V ~ s 1 M • L J w 0. e o ) N O 7 f ) II - R r woroo Mrr•rJ tll-oo 7 In a1 V oa0 ata ~ In N ~O O C 7ln NT U ao In ri -- r v a v v a N d P ~O ~•- O r N~ OOH K ~ o M N ~O M M aD otlJON O N ,o a N N ~ r- ~ r O~ N ~ .- ~ r m .n •c M ~ T M T O • ~O M 7 ~O ~ r• ~ N 1J1 c M o u N P 1nWOO < F P 1J1 O r Odo~N ~ 7N~oe ~ to o a r• P is - r r i e w i L a O I L a. C (_ O r O •+ C •+ i N d r rn c e w C d v ~ .• r O L C x .+ O ~i owda N > M d d C b ~ O w L 1 C+• r U F C w +• ~ •+ L e U 1 C d O ++ f C d C ~ ~ w o o a o u ~ ac.lwa W o N o N N Y t0 O ID ID 0000 9 17 S '! 0 '. N O .v - 7c .- c N O ~ r o c o e N d N O r- r ~o ~ w~ ao u I I I 1 0 i .u N ~O f 1 v' f 7 f 1 .- f ~O e O f i In f 1 / i ~ M w 7 d C s d m d b~ T O ~ .r a E w~ of T 0 R A 0.00 o~ o 0 ~ ' N spot O O d N o.e In to a UINK vrt i I ~ .r .o IN N ~O O + o o f J O o ~ O O ~ > o W • +ODN• r ct a ~ a - n u V J C w s- T 1 ~~ e v q .r .. 7 W o~• b 0. > C b ~ ti ~ O d K U W x -. w _~~ UJ OI - N M I TOE i 0 0 i ~ 7 ' ooc 0 o c 0 o a O F d ocor 0 0. F a+ O N In 0 0 0 t 0 ~. c N d L 7 r C V O C r d c a .• x > W r d I v a d w L d V N L b 7 N a 7 e V- .~ d d 11! tY ~ oW' Q 7 o+ In 0 0 t a+ o Ir+ o N e I o+ o ov ~0 0 ao In N a, o w ~ fo 0 M t7' M N N N 0 I b O N N T N ro a at ao .o 7 N u u r d c u ~ ++ O > U L V sa N T -~ L w O C V L C O 6 V > c c M W N N O' O• 0 0 4 r a r r M t w r c fT~ L m t M N c f N~ I O 1 N 1 N In 0 M I Ul N In i 0 i i~ I N 0 0 M .a r C d E L w a s C] I C O z O In 0 Z v O F 7 fl al Q n r y r y M O ~~ r Irl u r o u M e e rJ u t f f t f o• 1 T f M f R 7 I v I I O tll ~ L d L a C w L F a i C 7 w L r c N ~O T 0 7 ~ 1 O N r• W I al rt N ~I I at N M ~O fT at N N m .n t1~ m N a In N at 0 O z lL J Q J- O H 4 : 7 N 0 o+ O N F W W M W m •o at N M ~O O ~c P al Ul N In ~o T al N Q N N O J F O H 0 z a z V ~ 't /` ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ""L~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Summary of County Ridership and Costs for Valley Metro COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Considering the possibility of a significant loss of revenue from the State, I do not see how we can expand this service at this time. BACKGROUND: Valley Metro currently operates two routes which extend into Roanoke County. The first is the extension along Avenham Avenue into Tanglewood Mall and the second is the loop off of Hershberger Road into Edinburgh Square. The combination of these two routes have sufficient ridership so that there is no fiscal impact to the County to subsidize these two routes. It should be noted that the route along Hershberger Road also makes stops in front of the Friendship Manor building whereby County residents may come to the street and utilize this service. The subsidy which the County would be expected to pay for any other routes extended into the County is based on the miles driven in this locality (total of all routes and all trips) multiplied by the Variable cost per mile to Valley Metro (currently $1.75 per mile) reduced by the revenues received from passengers boarding in this locality, divided by 2. In addition to this subsidy for the fixed route service, the locality would be billed for one half of the cost of the Specialized Transit Service (STAR) which is provided for this service area. The new federal guidelines require this specialized service to be offered to any customer living within three-quarters of a mile of the fixed route service. During the period November, 1987 to July, 1989, the County also subsidized the route extension along Brambleton Avenue to the area of the Post Office off of Route 419. At the time this route was terminated, the number of passengers per day had dropped to an average of 8.9 with a projected annual cost of $30,000 for the subsidy from the County. The businesses in the area indicated that the bus service had not significantly improved their customer traffic and they could not afford to assist in the required subsidy. The Board of Supervisors voted on April 25, 1989 to discontinue that particular route (Brambleton Avenue). In recent years, staff has also developed with the help of Valley Metro cost projections for route extensions going a shorter r . I A distance along Brambleton Avenue and also along Williamson Road and/or Plantation Road to serve the Hollins College area. The projected costs for these routes were $9,000 to extend along Brambleton Avenue to the Brambleton Corporate Center and $33,475 to extend to the Hollins College area. Other routes have been discussed but have not been priced at this time. A study by the Fifth Planning District Commission identified the North County area as being worthy of study based on the large number of persons without automobiles. Further analysis indicated that this information was based on the Census Bureau data and seemed to be generally confined to the Adult Care Facilities in the area, several of which are already served by Valley Metro. The County recently received a grant to assist our CORTRAN program in establishing a limited fixed route service for rural parts of Roanoke County. We are working with the CORTRAN staff at this time to finalize the proposed routes for this service. At this time, riders on Valley Metro pay a cash fare of $1.25. It is not anticipated at this time that the rate will be increased. The cost to ride the STAR service is currently $2.00 and is expected to increase to $2.50 effective July, 1995. The County's CORTRAN program is currently provided at no cost to the passenger, however, the County pays an annual subsidy of $70,000 to operate the program. This is a demand based service served by appointment and stays full most of the time. Staff will be happy to assist in pricing any suggested routes which may be considered by the Board. Motion by: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Respectfully submitted, ,/ - ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, .-7,,w ~. Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) , a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment C) . FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Appro ed by, . y-L»= J,hn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator ---------- County Administrator ------------------------------ ------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A January 24, 1995 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY Construction for this facility has been substantially completed, and all services are fully operating in the new and renovated spaces. Several items from the interior and exterior punch lists must be finished prior to releasing the contractor's retainage. Most new furnishings and equipment have been installed, although a few items remain outstanding. DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK Phase I of the project is complete. Phase II will involve minor silt removal from downstream of the Route 311 bridge. We expect to remove remaining silt through the winter months. PARKS AND RECREATION Starkey Park: Three baseball fields and the lighting of one field are completed. The restroom/utility and parking lot are under construction. Garst Mill Park: The playground is under construction and the parking lot work is begin bid. Brambleton Center: The monies that were transferred to the Brambleton Center from the Leisure Arts Center were used to install the new elevator, which is complete. VALLEY TECHPARK This project is 99 % complete. VDOT will provide a final project cost for the completion of Phase I of the road and interchange improvements shortly. ~oov' ~,°oo a~ ~~ ~ yb4N C~ ~ •--~ N 6R i; z -d ai O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ^' O O U O O ~ `n U ~ U ;b O ~ a ~" w N A N U ~ O~~ a ~ N z~~ o~~ ~~ti H x ., ., ~ ~ °~ a Q o~ Q W w ., w A ~ ~ O z F ~ O rn W Q W C7 A W z H ~ Q Q Q a a z 0 v U i F F Q 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~, ~ O c~ •~ O t~. O ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ U ~ ~ t-~ _,,, O ~ ~ ~+ bA cd y 'C b ~ ~ c~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ v~ c~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ,_, .., ~ ~ ^~ '~ y •~ ~ ~ ~ 3 a~ ~ i~ cd ~ O ~ ~. bA ~ N .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cd b +~~' O U ce3 +-' v~ ,S~ ,r; N O ~ C; w ~ O ~ ~ a~ ~ U > ~ a~ C/1 -d c~ H o,, •~ z~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o~~ U '~,' ~ V "' ~ O O l~ O ~t O ~/'~ C1. p O VO .-~ ~ M ~ ~ b4 6F} O ~ z ^d Q o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o '~ U ~ W O a W H d F-~ U ~ O~~ a N N z~~ O~~ W ~ ti H W a U a a ICI DTI Az d a z~ A4 d~' U ~C A a ., z ., °~ a o~ Q w w z ti U W A "' o z 0 w Q w C7 A O t4 A z a Q Q z a Q Q z a a Q z a a w z a Q A z a Q Q z a Q d F, Q F Q F Q F, ~ F, Q E, d F. a U d ,a a U Q ,a a U Q ,a a U Q ,a a U d ,..~ w U d ,~ a U O x E. F F. Q O ~' w ~H~ a ~ H Qa UW ~ d ~a o w a boo A A? 30 Q 0 U ~ U a° a U o F a U Q W U ~n 0 U w 'd .~ cd a 0 .~ c~ W 0 0 .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 0 bn 0 a~ U O ~+ ,s i.+ ... a~ H W O N O ..... L: c~ ~, 0 U O O 0 ~: z 0 U d s~ 0 .', -~ 0 0 U U N O a W H A F U O z °~ ~i O O O ~; ~Q 0 ~~ ~ .~~ ~~ a~ W rn rn ~' N ti A x U -., A F~ F U W O a w t~ ~a A a ., z ., ~" °~ a d w w z U W A ~ O z U O W Q w c7 A oa ] ~ ~ ~ z z z z a ~ a d a d a Q z w Q U o H ~' °' z ~ ~ F ~~ Qz z H ~o Qo 0 0 H W 0 M b- `7 ~ooo ~ooo ~. o '~ '~ o~~~ ~ ~ i U ,.D ~ ~ ~ A z~s ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q A o a~ U ~ ~..~ W U N O a W H A N U '~ O~~ pa',,, N N z~~ Q ~.., ~", ~ ~ ti W a z H O a W F~ A a ., ., °~ a Q rn d W w ti W A o z ~ F O rn W Q w c~ A W ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z Q F z Q H z Q H z Q H Q H a'~.~ Q a ¢ a Q a ~ a Q 0 0 0 x xQ F, ~ ~ F W Q ~ F F a a F ~ W ~U Q [G o QU o U o F rig z 0 U ~'` V '~ ~ooo ~oo°o ~p~n0 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~] ~ ~ ~ Q z~~ o~ ~~ ~¢ U ~ ,.~ W U N O ~, a W H A H U ~ O~~ ~ N N ~' z~~ ~+ ~ ~ ~4 d ti x W V z 0 C/~ N U O a a d Q~ P4 A ., z a ., ~, °~ a d rn d W w ., U W Q 0 z ~- U O w W C7 Q GC z ~ z a ¢ a d a d z 0 ~ ~" F ~ W H wF z .a H ~ U O O a~ bn -d .~ M 0 x 0 a~ i-~ 0 b O .--~ ed O ~. ... O Q .., 3 ~~ c~ ~, a o . ~ °~ ~ 3 o ~ U ~ ~ .~ ,S: N ~ •~ O ~~ N ,~_, .s,"' ^-~ ,-+ v~ w bA O ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ N O ~" v~ ~" z~ ~~ N V~ D-7 ~o°o ~ ~,ooQ ~~~ o U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'd z~~ ~: °o w ~ U o ~ 0 U U N O t~ a ., z ti ~, d °i a d x a d -~i w w U (~ z a d o U i w ~ A H ~ O O z a a ~ ~, ~ o q °~ w A ~ ~ d H w c~ Q m W H A F ~ ~ o~ O~~ pa,, N N z~~ o~~ ~ ~ ti A z .a d Q z .a d W z .a d w z .a d Q z ~ d W z .a d d E" d F, d F. d H d F. d F" a U d ,~ a U d ,.a a U d ,~ a U d ,~ a U d ,..,~ a U d F o z 0 d x ~ z ~ H ~ G F. ~ C W WN WzQ 0 "~z O z O Ed-~ O ~ ~ U a ~ ¢ z 0 U © '~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q b4 O ~ o i-.i `n N U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bn GGz~ ~ a ~ o W ~ U ~ ~ 0 0 U U N O a W H d a H U '~ o~'~' a ~ N z~~ O r.., ~" r..~ Wdti z a ., z ti '^ d °~ a d w w Q ' ., .: w A 0 z ~- U O o~ W c~ d w c7 A ca Q a Q a w a w a Q a Q a w a Q a Z d ~ z d ~ z d ~ z d ~ z d ~ z d F z Q d ~ z Q d d U ~ a U Q a ~ ~ a U d a U Q a U a v a U a d a d a d a d a d a d a d a d o ~ o A w z ~ d ~ z ~' x ~~ w H U a H ~,~, U W a ~ z C7 3z N Ax w ~ ~+ H x ~ Q F W 6 L.~ ~., r W ~ d A W F ~U ~ P~.U~ dU U ~ a a x F x A H U O 'aM V A z U ~' ~O ~O ~ ~G..ooA ~--i ~ O ~ ~ N ~ L7 z ~ ~ W ~ o W S-.' U ;~ U O O U U Q~ O ~, a W H d F U ~ ~a ~ ~ N z~~ +J ~ ~ ¢ ti a ., z O ., ~, °~ a d c4 o~ d t4 W w z ., U W A ~ O z ~ F U O o~ a w a w c7 A Q z a Q Q z a a A z .a a w z a d w z a a A z a ~ Q z a ~ Q H Q H ~ F Q F Q F Q F ¢ F a U d ,~ a U ¢ ,.a a U Q ,.~ a U Q ,..~ a U Q „a a. U Q ,.a a U d a o p vxi Q d H d ~~~. zw W w~ a Q .a Q ¢H~ .a U ~H~ ~ UO ~z ~ W `n O Q W~ QUF Q az w O ra..~C7 a w "w"~Q W 3a C7 a wOj W az ~OZ aa0 H O v i U a . v~ U O ~+ w 0 a ~''. O U N .ice ~° =N '~ c~ ~. 0 .., 3 ... cc3 .., O bA ~." c~ a~ z U 00 ~~~ a~o~ o 00 r, •~ ~ o O O M y ~ ,-~ ~' N ~ V1 a,~~M N ,--i i.~ O ~ 64 O bA ~ O ~ +~+ cd '~ N ~ Q ~' 00 p O U ~ ~ ~o ~ a" o ~+ >C N W z 0 U W F A H V '~ O ~ ,-~ a ~ N z~~ O +'' ~" ~dti ., z ti °~ a Q U ~ w w ~ z a ti z O ~ H w Wd a a °z H U O x ~ W a a H CW7 A p O rri ('r1 N M ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,--~ 'cT ~/? ~-" ~ O O ~-" Vl [~ ~ ~ M (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z z z z a Q a'~. Q a Q a Q w .. z w a ~ a Q z F a ~ W W ~ ~ F ¢ " " ~ h P . ~ 0. O b a~ a 0 U c~ c~ Gs+ ~, N 0 4-i 0 Q 0 U a~ 'o O N .~ U ~U+ G 0 3-i r--~ i-1 Q~ c~ a F ~ z~ 0 U o~ 0-7 NOM •~OOO xi ~ ~ O N ~--~ a o s~ cn 0 ~~ ~~ o ~' an ~ N ~ ~' c~ ~ ~ Q o ° o U ~o o ~ ~~ a~ .~ w z 0 U W F A F U ~ ~ `""' ~ N N z~~ 0 +J ~ W d ti a ., Q °~ a d ~, Q U w w a z a z O ~ F w d Q U ~ o W z z °i U ~ ° a °~ W a F., A S M rn ° ~ •--i o N ~ M N rn ~ .-i ° ~ N ~ ~ g N ~O ~ ~ M 0.1 Q a w a a Q a ~ w a ~ Q a ~ z ] z z z z a Q a Q aa. Q aa. ~ a w a a ~ d ~ ~ z d .aa, ~ p ~ p O W O F p ~ C7 ~ ~ ~ W W H W p H 'd cd 0 a .., -~ o ~~ ~~ •~~" i~-i N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o '~ 3 '~' o ~ o .r., ~ ~: ~ ~ a ,~ a~ a~ ~~ ~ o 00 .~ ~~ .., ~~ ~~ ~~ o .~ U ~ ~~ ~b ~~ ~~ O .--~ Q) rLi ~ H ~; ~ ' ~ ~ ~a H ~ N ~ ~ Z ~ ~ O ~~~ ~ U ° O ~~~ NOM •~oOO "~" ,~ ~ O ~ ~ +--~ ,~ ~ ~ a N 6 F3 M ~ '~ it O ~ 6R ~--~ O Gq ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ Q °o 0 0 U a~ ~ ~ a ~ z ~", W A O U U W F A F U ~ ~~ a ~ N z~~ Q ~ G ~Q Q ti H Chi a z 0 FBI H U A a a z a a~. o~ Q ~ II W z ti U W A v ~ 0 z °~ U O '? E 's;G'~ ` iiiiii i i i i~ rn ?? :4;t i i:i`;iii :: :: i i # : `~ ~ ~ 8 F ~ ~ N ~ ~ '^ a w ~ ~ z a z ~ z ] z z H F a d a d a d a d a Q ~ ~o ca ~ W A ~ F a a a ~ ~a ~ o~H F wz a~~ o~a z a a~ ~~ ez~!a a~~ ~ ~ ¢ A ~ oar .a ~ Q A r W U ~F ~Od O aw r , a~ d d' a~ 0 U .., U ..--i ,1~ O cd N ~. ~° N a~ U O c~ N 0 a~ .~ 0 H z U ~~~ .-r >,000 T O O O O O U O~ O O d ~ 69 O y.; Q ~ by~A ~ ~ "~ Q O Z ~ O ~ o ~ 'd U ~ U U ~ ~ a~ .~ a a~i G j 'o ~, a W F a H U '~ rn ~ ~ pa,,, N N z~~ O~~ ~Q Qi ti a ., z ti °~ a d x a d w w z ~ d F w O " a a ~ ~ °z F U O o~ W d W Q CO ~ ~ H H a ~ ¢ Q ¢ `a Q a a d o , a a . w ~ A ~ moo" F w Hww a~ d Q 3 U ti ti~~ F d ~ d a,FO .a Q ° o oz n a a o 9 > U d d U d F H w /-~ O N ~~ .-r ~ O 00 ~ O O ~ Q ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 6F} 6R .~ ~ ~~ ~ Z ~ Q O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ;.~ O U ~ 'b ~ ~ ~o W ~, a H A H U ~ O~~ pa',,, N N z~~ O~~ rad-~ d a U W Ey W a a .a ., z ti a Q rn ~ Q W w z ., U W Q o z F 0 w c~ W C7 A w ~ ¢ z H d ¢ H d a a a 0 Q z 0 a a F E"~ w a Q a' adz ~~o ~ 0 H 0 cd b «3 O O a~ a 0 0 ... a~ a 0 U ,S~ ~+ Yr ~.+ O U r--~ U N 'o a C". a~ 0 ~. .~ H 0 A a~ 0 U ~ _~ N ~'. "-' O ~ ~ .~ H ~ O a F _~ z~ ~ ~ O ~' U .~ M ~_ °°oo ~' o .--. ~ O N r, ~ •--~ y„ ~ b4 ~ ~+ z~~ ~A ~ o o d ~ a~ a W w Q O b .., U ti i~ 0 :~ ~. O O U U N O it a W F A F U x a z Q rn rn N ti .a ., z ., ~, a °~ a Q rn Q W w d ti w Q ~ ~ 0 z H U O rn W d g F ~ o N O N Q W H H z a ~ a d w ~ O w F a z F a a ~ H z 0 U O' D-7 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment C January 24, 1995 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Fields FIRE HYDRANTS: All fire hydrants have been installed. NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY: Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center -Replace Lights Mt. Pleasant Park Brambleton Center Elevator Other than a few remaining items, this project is essentially completed. Page 1 of 2 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER y-' AT A REGULAR MEE`T'ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE QOUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of December 31, 1994. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CONII"IENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BAI~CERS ACCEPTANCE CENTRAL FIDELITY 358,260.00 CRAIGIE 993,314.72 FERGUSON-ANDREWS 1,190,496.00 NATIONS 1,105,934.70 SCOIT & STRINGFE.LLOW 993,000.56 WHEAT 1ST 2,356,204.50 6,997,210.48 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & IRAN 100,000.00 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: COMMONWEALTH INVESThIEN'P 99,038.33 CRESTAR 991,680.56 NATIONS 1,016,830.92 PAINE-WEBBER 994,902.22 SIGNET 8,988,841.69 SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 992,333.33 13,083,627.05 FEDERAL CREDIT: PAINE-WEBBER 994,088.89 PRUDENTIAL 1,000,000.00 SCOTT & STRINGFET,LOW 994,194.44 2,988,283.33 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 1,051,148.22 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 8,379,168.80 9,430,317.02 REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: FIRST VIRGINIA 4,659,000.00 sIGNEr 10,078.13 4,669,078.13 SAVINGS: FIRST UNION 2,252.88 NATIONS 222,475.37 224,728.25 'Ib'I'AL 37 , 493 , 244.26 `• Page 2 of 2 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEE`T'ING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OOUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN'T'ER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of December 31, 1994. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Res fully S " tted by fred C. Anderson County Treasurer ACTION Approved ( )Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approv by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohnike _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~-g rac~mat 101I Given under our hands this ninth day of January nineteen hundred and ninery- five. WHEREAS, WHEREAS, on January 20, 1995, the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke will celebrate its 75th Anniversary; and the Kiwanis Club has performed outstanding community service during those 75 years; and WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club is the largest community service organization in the Roanoke Valley and the 12th largest of more than 8,500 Kiwanis Clubs in the world; and WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club makes immeasurable contributions of volunteer time to community service and philanthropic programs for youth and elderly residents in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club provides valuable networking opportunities for business leaders, governmem leaders and involved citizens to promote close working relationships among all segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club has brought significant national recognition to the Roanoke Valley with its programs and civic activities; and WHEREAS, the Kiwanis Club continues to have a profound effect on the quality of life in the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned, in recognition of the ouustanding accomplishments of the Kiwanis Club of Roanoke Valley, do hereby proclaim Friday, January 20, 1995, as K/WANIS CLUB OF ROANOKE VAllEY 75TH ANNIVERSARY DAY. Mayor of the City of Roanoke Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors o-q ,~ ~ ~xx~~~xx ~ ~r t.~r ~ ftOA ~ F ~ L Z A a2 38 DECLARING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1995 AS AMERICAN MUSIC MONTH WHEREAS, Music, often described as the universal language, Is one of the great arts; and its value 1s recognized as a source of enrichment for our lives; and WHEREAS, The annual Parade of AMERICAN MUSIC, sponsored by the National Federation of Music Clubs, 1s featured throughout the month of February with the design to give due recognition to America's music traditions and to encourage and support worthy United States composers; and WHEREAS, The Thursday Morning Music Club and the Virginia Federation of Music Clubs are component parts of the National Federation of Music Clubs and join in the Parade with its notable purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, H. Odell 'Fuzzy' Mlnnlx, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, V/rginla, in recognition of the United States' creative musical artists and America's music tradltfon, do hereby proclaim the month of February, 1995, as AMERICAN MUSIC MONTH 1n Roanoke County; and urge all citizens to join in the observance ofAmerican Music Month through appreciation and enjoyment of American music. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ' `eve hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the County Roanoke to be affixed this the 19th day of January, 1995. -l ~c( lf/./~.-.,~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" ix, Chairman ATTEST: y»~_ ~ • Q~c~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board ti ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"`~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Report of Claims Activity for the Self- Insurance Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance with the Self-Insurance Program, Ordinance #61494-4, Section 2-86.C attached is the 2nd Quarter (October, November and December) claims activity and status report. FISCAL IMPACT• STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully submitted, Motion by: / ~ C.:- Robert C. Jer igan Elmer C. Hodg Risk Manager County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs ~-r ~ Q~ w r~ W m W N m ~ ~ ~ N } W a V ~ Z z a Z N I W J W r z o W O Z w o J F F W N N } m ~ • O a a Q ~fl a F (A • O O ZI ~ M Q J v a O M s a M H a a J J U U M W a ~ a ~ ~ W W z f- F- N a a a ~ c's r U O O W OC 6 o a a F z W r oc Q a w O 0 0 0 0 o In o 0 vi r ~ o r O m o l'7 M 1+1 r M M M M L L ~ ~ L L L ~ ~ ~ • • OI qi C L b Z C g S 'O a a Y Y a al 0 0 C U U ~ ~ ~ V ~ O O O O U U U U O O O O O C O O 3 O C l Y C M M 3 r r •a r r •a rA a 'O ~ ~ O 3 f Y r r 1 1~ 4 ~ n @ I tl t0 10 Y •° v v ~ 'O m s .c c Y I I L ~ m L a m ° ~ a ~ J ~. n ff c i a C ~ ~ m m l r m L Y Q Q Z 3 C7 m m m ++ ~ ~ a a w ~ S 3 ~ ~ ~ + v v •o •r •r r r • r' •r 0 r 0 0 r ~+ ++ N M to > 1 o n 1 It1 u 1 M 11 1 r it I O II i II I ~ I1 1 h 11 S N a J U 0 M Q a J Q O h m a i 0 z Y V' f ~ ~f N QI OI OI OI M \ \ \ \ \ F- Iq O N 1(~ ~ W O T O O N 1 I ~ C p ~ r r f7 M H O N fp J ZI O O O U o-~o Z W OI O r IA I M 11 M ~ O OI Ifl ' M ~ W M O O N •~ I r 11 J M H O II'I T I II f- N N N IA I V 11 f.. I II W Iii I r n M N N N N N I N II IA tll m m m ~ U U ~ • • a v v a • a ~ a ~ • a ~ a i i O ~ ~ ~ ~ • a) 0 0 0 0 ~ U U U U • O m O v In O v o r In N O ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ) J N N P • ^ P1 V r LLLill. N N M N N W d: W ~ F- m ~ r F- N . ~ r ~ U ~ Q U V L Q ~ m ~ ~ L ~ Z H M ~ Y ~•~ i•I Q Q U O L J J l0 LL U U L Y O. J O W to a ~ ` c ~ a O. C ~ ~ ~ M J W W O ~ U ~ O Q ~ 0 Q 7 4 - Q/ Q Q a d M m Y ~ f ~ W ~ OC m C O) O o a a ~ m w ~ r m m c ++ +~ m W 3 S = ~ U ~ 'O ~ L L r +~ n a o 0 0 0 ~ W a m w > a o ~ O Z Y N ~ a J m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1 r M a0 Itf I n W O r N O ¢) O O ~ v ~ J O .• r O Q N ~ ~ w CO Iff 0D O Q ' ~ a 0 0 0 0 ~, ~~ ~~i .j; v ` '~.,, ~ ~ _:~ 1995 !~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~; Office of the Governor George Allen Governor January 20, 1995 Deaz Colleague: Please forgive the form of this communication, but I wanted to respond immediately to the concerns expressed by some local government leaders regarding my proposal to eliminate the Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) Tax, or gross receipts tax. There has been a great deal of misinformation circulating in recent days regazding this proposal, and some local leaders would not have unjustified concerns regarding the revenue impact of my plan if they knew the truth. First, let me emphasize that a growing economy and growing revenues aze the chief ends of both of my tax proposals -- the individual income tax cut for working families and the gross receipts tax elimination. These proposals will leave $2.1 billion in the hands of the people in the cities, counties, and towns throughout Virginia during the next five years. Enclosed is alocality-by-locality breakdown of the additional resources that will remain in your communities over the next five years, if my proposals are approved. In my conversations with business men and women throughout Virginia during the last yeaz, I have heazd again and again that the gross receipts tax is especially destructive to our efforts to bring new jobs and resources to the Commonwealth. And while not every locality levies the gross receipts tax, every locality suffers when our Commonwealth loses jobs and revenue because small businesses do not expand and out-of-state prospects select business sites outside Virginia. In crafting a plan to phase out this regressive, job-killing tax, I was determined not to place the burden on local governments. I have also listened carefully to the genuine concerns voiced by local government leaders in recent weeks. State Capitol Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-22ll TDD (804) 371-8015 Accordingly, I have asked Delegate John Watkins and Senator Walter Stosch to introduce legislation that will phase out the gross receipts tax over the next five years, with these key features: • During the five-year phase-out period, localities will be required to reduce gross receipts tax revenues by an amount equal to the replacement revenue provided bx the Commonwealth. • There is no obligation on the part of localities to reduce BPOL revenue if the state fails to provide replacement revenue. • During the five-year phase-out, localities will continue to eniov the benefit of BPOL revenue increases resulting from economic rowth. • The promise of continuing state support after the five-year phase- out is backed up by this explicit guazantee: If state reQacement revenues aze not provided, authority to levy the gross receipts tax will be restored. These provisions reflect my commitment to holding localities harmless during the five-year period in which this regressive tax is eliminated. These provisions also should allay fears that~state support will evaporate after the gross receipts tax is eliminated, or that other local taxes will have to be raised. I believe this program is balanced, fair, and beneficial to Virginia's competitive position in attracting new jobs. Because of the replacement revenue guazantee, the elimination of this egregious tax will be funded primarily through reductions in state, not local, spending. I have also kept my commitment to veto unfunded mandates on localities. My actions have enhanced local flexibility by effectively halting the insidious practice of imposing new obligations without corresponding state funding. Finally, I have made cleaz my desire to move forward comprehensively during the next yeaz in forging a new partnership between the Commonwealth and its cities, counties, and towns. I want to join local government leaders and members of the General Assembly in a bipartisan seazch for a more coherent and equitable allocation of resources and responsibilities at the state and local levels. I will be responding more directly to your individual communications, and I hope you will contact me if you have further questions. In the meantime, I trust this information has been helpful. Sincerely, George Allen Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fu11y Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Counties Reduction Payment Returned Accomack X1,941.5 $166.5 $2,107.9 Albemarle 4,626.6 3,241.9 7,868.4 Alleghany 883.9 308.8 1,192.7 Amelia 639.4 62.8 702.1 Amherst 1,873.1 272.7 2,145.8 Appomattox 855.2 1.0 856.3 Arlington 13,607.1 31,294.1 44,901.2 Augusta 4,154.8 1,202.5 5,357.3 Bath 380.5 0.0 380.5 Bedford 3,591.2 0.5 3,591.7 Bland 377.0 0.0 377.0 Botetourt 1,911.9 433.8 2,345.7 Brunswick 858.4 0.5 858.9 Buchanan 1,512.1 0.0 1,512.1 Buckingham 729.0 0.0 729.0 Campbell 3,324.0 2.8 3,326.8 Caroline 1,347.3 395.5 1,742.8 Carroll 1,615.7 0.0 1,615.7 Charles City 456.5 0.0 456.5 Charlotte 745.3 0.0 745.3 Chesterfield 17,710.9 12,220.1 29,931.0 Clarke 771.0 9.4 780.4 Craig 300.2 0.0 300.2 Culpeper 1,965.9 0.0 1,965.9 Cumberland 428.3 0.0 428.3 Dickenson 835.0 0.0 835.0 Dinwiddie 1,415.6 178.3 1,593.9 Essex 629.4 0.0 629.4 Fairfax 66,241.8 52,964.5 119,206.3 Fauquier 3,821.2 593.5 4,414.7 Floyd 765.3 0.0 765.3 Fluvanna 913.7 0.0 913.7 Franklin 2,696.9 4.9 2,701.8 Frederick 3,523.0 1,241.2 4,764.1 Giles 1,084.0 0.0 1,084.0 Gloucester 2,053.8 610.6 2,664.4 Goochland 1,029.9 201.2 1,231.1 Grayson 1,019.6 0.0 1,019.6 Greene 782.3 100.3 882.6 Greensville 601.2 199.3 800.5 Halifax 1,870.0 162.9 2,032.9 Hanover 5,401.8 260.3 5,662.1 Henrico 16,897.6 17,514.6 34,412.2 Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income 5300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Counties Reduction Payment Returned Henry 4,083.0 908.3 4,991.3 Highland 148.8 0.0 148.8 Isle of Wight 1,901.3 340.6 2,241.9 James City 2,710.3 2,125.9 4,836.2 King George 938.1 354.2 1,292.3 King and Queen 377.0 0.0 377.0 King William 839.0 0.0 839.0 Lancaster 754.8 0.0 754.8 Lee 1,116.3 0.0 1,116.3 Loudoun 7,784.9 3,905.2 11,690.1 Louisa 1,375.4 106.3 1,481.8 Lunenburg 674.3 0.0 674.3 Madison 771.4 0.0 771.4 Mathews 556.1 104.4 660.5 Mecklenburg 1,871.5 0.0 1,871.5 Middlesex 572.1 0.4 572.5 Montgomery 3,872.0 0.0 3,872.0 Nelson 816.2 19.9 836.1 New Kent 844.1 257.7 1,101.8 Northampton 690.5 0.1 690.6 Northumberland 718.6 0.0 718.6 Nottoway 852.7 116.8 969.5 Orange 1,566.1 0.0 1,566.1 Page 1,389.3 59.8 1,449.0 Patrick 1,074.5 0.0 1,074.5 Pittsyivania 3,680.5 121.9 3,802.4 Powhatan 1, 076.8 38.6 1,115.3 Prince Edward 879.5 0.0 879.5 Prince George 1,586.6 465.7 2,052.2 __ Prince wlliam 15,758.1 6,187.6 21,945.7 Pulaski 2,183.5 0.0 2,183.5 Rappahannock 466.3 0.0 466.3 Richmond 460.2 0.0 460.2 Roanoke 6,215.6 2,465.9 8,681.6 Rockbridge 1,209.3 352.5 1,561.8 Rockingham 4,435.2 0.0 4,435.2 Russell 1,607.6 0.0 1,607.6 Scott 1,303.8 0.0 1,303.8 Shenandoah 1,764.1 0.0 1,764.1 Smyth 2,031.9 0.0 2,031.9 Southampton 1,085.5 85.6 1,171.1 Spotsyivania 4,630.5 1,390.4 6,020.9 Stafford 4,869.9 0.0 4,869.9 Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income 5300 Million Totat Tax BPOL Amount Counties ~ Reduction Payment Returned Surry 426.5 49.9 476.4 Sussex 632.9 0.1 633.0 Tazewell 2,639.8 0.0 2,639.8 Warren 2,291.3 451.3 2,742.5 Washington 2,976.8 0.0 2,976.8 Westmoreland 996.7 0.0 996.7 VVse 2,245.9 0.0 2,245.9 Wythe 1,659.3 0.0 1,659.3 York 3,091.1 1,739.6 4,830.7 Total Counties $288,692.5 $145,293.1 $433,985.6 Cities Alexandria $8,497.3 $12,569.3 $21,066.5 Bedford 400.0 190.7 590.7 Bristol 1,730.2 861.1 2,591.3 Buena Vista 382.2 146.3 528.5 Charlottesville 2,337.7 2,722.9 5,060.6 Chesapeake 11,000.7 10,490.6 21,491.3 Clifton Forge 290.3 134.6 424.9 Colonial Heights 1,217.5 901.5 2,119.1 Covington 449.0 421.8 870.8 Danville 3,337.3 2,312.0 5,649.3 Emporia 355.0 334.4 689.5 Fairfax 1,446.7 4,178.7 5,625.4 Falls Church 918.2 1,859.3 2,777.5 Franklin 533.2 470.1 1,003.3 Fredericksburg 1,240.9 1,637.7 2,878.6 Galax 372.2 571.8 944.1 Hampton 7,495.3 6,274.0 13,769.3 Harrisonburg 1,589.2 2,852.7 4,441.8 Hopewell 1,422.1 1,289.5 2,711.6 Lexington 329.6 280.6 610.2 Lynchburg 3,819.7 4,721.4 8,541.1 Manassas 2.376.8 988.7 3,365.4 Manassas Park 485.8 230.9 716.7 Martinsville 1,132.8 908.2 2,041.0 Newport News 9,594.2 7,909.0 17,503.2 Norfolk 10,695.4 14,038.6 24,734.0 Norton 232.8 489.6 722.4 Petersburg 2.098.8 1,599.8 3,698.7 Poquoson 812.7 157.5 970.2 Governor's Tax Reduction Plan Benefit to Each Locality When Fully Phased In (FY 2000) (thousands) Share of Income $300 Million Total Tax BPOL Amount Cities Reduction Payment Returned Portsmouth 5,820.2 4,345.3 10,165.5 Radford 645.9 309.5 955 4 Richmond 10,751.5 20,454.7 . 31,206.2 Roanoke 5,561.7 8,155.0 13,716.7 Salem 1,638.4 2,255.0 3,893.5 South Boston 472.6 362.5 835 0 Staunton 1,462.5 1,139.1 . 2,601.6 Suf;olk 3,369.1 1,708.8 5,077.9 Virginia Beach 22,415.0 19,011.1 41,426.1 Waynesboro 1,295.0 1,026.0 2,321.0 Williamsburg 493.3 1,040.9 1,534.2 wnchester 1,488.9 2,164.8 3,653.7 Total Cities $132,007.5 $143,516.1 $275,523.6 Separate Total for 32 Selected Towns $0.0 $11,190.8 $11,190.8 Aggregate $420,700.0 $300,000.0 $720,700.0 The income tax reduction by locality was computed as follows. For each locality the average number of exemptions per return is multiplied by the number of returns whose last dollar of taxable income falls into each of the state's four tax bradceb. Each of these four figures is then multiplied by 51600 (the exemption increase in TY 1999) and the appropriate marginal tax rate. These four figures are then added together. The final step requires converting this TY 1992 total tax reduction figure t0 a TY 1999 figure. Each of the tax reduction ~ e majorceweakness wistil~thismethod logy s its inability to account far ~ ecumulative a offecb of ecot nomic growth and inflation which will push many more taxpayers into higher marginal brackets between TY 1992 and TY 1999. The tax reduction estimates will be too low for those localities which expehence the greatest income growth per return (espedally at the lower income levels); estimates will pe too high for kxalities which expehence relatively slower average growth. The 5300 million payment by the state to loplities to compensate them for lost BPOL revenue has been divided by locality accartiing to each loglity's share of statewide FY 1993 BPOL collections. That data is collected by APA. BPOL taxes administered ny towns (in addition to or in the absence of a county levy) are not taken into account in computing the counties' share of the state payment APA nrairrtains data on only 32 towns. These towns' share of the 5300 million FY 2000 payment is shown separately in the chart above. The share that would tfe distributed to towns other than those 32 is not known: that money has been dbbibuted proportionately among all localities for the purposes of preparing this chart Bepuse of the lade of complete BPOL data by locality, this chart's 5300 million BPOL repayment distribution should be viewed stndly as an estimate. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session with School Board and School Personnel on Structure of Teachers' Salary Scale. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: During last year's budget process, the Board asked staff to determine what deficiencies existed in the salary scale for County teachers. Because of the issue's complexity, this time has been set aside for a work session with the School Board members, Dr. Gordon, and other school personnel. Dr. Gordon and I will make some introductory remarks. Jerry Hardy will provide some information and Butch Kelly, President of the Roanoke County Education Association, has arranged for the teachers to present some information that they have accumulated. ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens SE\7' BY ~ W(~OD5, ROGERS, &H.42LEGR0 ~ 1-23-80 _~ ~ 2~P!1i Raanofce~ V~100D5, ROCaERS a5~ HA,ZLEGI~VE, P.L,C. Auuuxy~ at Law Rr13t USYOt1 Tower l0 SouthkBereon SntK. ~iia 14M Romoke, Vi~gitwi iWll P,O. Ibux 14127 MoutCke, Ytfgit1u124038.41~ January 23, 1995 'I VIA FACSIMIL>r Fuzzy Minnix, Chairman Roanoke C~tanty Board of Supervisors Frank Thomas, Chairman xoanoke County School Board T1a~nzla Gordan, Superintendent lt~an~ke County Schools 7~3 772 2183 # `' _ ~~;~ 7ekpho~~ f03-OB3.76p0 F~Imilc 70398}7711 °~'K1tEt~s DIreC[ i!W Ttkphonc: (703) 983-7682 He: JOirit meeting between RAanAkP Caurity Board of Supervisors and Roanoke County School Board Dear Fuzzy, Frank and Deanna: I learned over the weekend that certain aliant~ had a temporary injunction (resl:Xa2ning order) is5ue~i nyailist them on Friday by a Federal. Court in West Virginia. UnfQrtunatoly, the judge, on riffs own without consulting with roe, $et the nearing in Charloetdn, W. Va. for tomorrow afternoon. Hence, it appeesra unlikely that T will makR the m~,ptlncJ. P1eRSe convey my apologies to Mr. Kelly. Very truly yours, iJOQTIS, ROC,FRS & HA~I,EG QVE , P . L . C . ~„J ~` Thomao ~, . I.a99 4 ~~ ~ O~~ ' M~NCOCA ~ Q v N v ~ CO CO C0 0) +Q Z Z (p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rChO~lnOO ~ Q r` rCC)O)O)N 00 ~ ' 7 - ~ r r C CO C7 W V az W ~Q O~CNOtMDOOO ()W ~ C~jr rrr Z Y OC - W` CO o N J Q r ia o J r ~ r r r ~ ~ ~ > V Q Y ~ Z J J Q Q O r M O O CA r I~ cD N ~ 0 0D ~ 1~ Z(A t1)C+7rOO0)Or O ~ MrC7~lnLnl~M ~ ; N M M M C7 C0 (h th aQ z J ZQ ~(n C~ChOI~ OCOOCO In (~r~rr(uN V M ~ O ~ 9 M M N ; C 7C 7 CD[ C C ~7 W Q Y ~ N' Q AA M M ''^^ 1^ W M ~ ~ W Y/ (~ I~ N Q(/~ CO Ch to CD O N CAOrf~ChrNr N ~ ~ ~ O N N tnC3 7c c c 7 7C 7C~C NC +~ > a W N M ~ ~ C O CA Cn CA 0) ~ Q ~ O~Q)O*-CV Ch~t~ W aomrnrnrnrnrnrn ~, O WMMOMO)Q) r r r r r r r r } W J J Q W Y O Z Q O O LL W Q ~_ H N W Q J O U W H N O Q rn M rn CA } W 0 M~ rn~ r N ` O N .fl N 'C7 U C U p cv N ' ~ W .~ o h- ~ C Q ~ W ~ m Rs N ~ •c W W •~ Q ~~ O i • f W N D Q Z CO r CO ~ r N M ~ r ~ ~ ~ N M~,r~M O ~, d NOCN7 ~~ ~ ~ r N r N ~E M~~ ~ N OOD O I ~ ° d r r r r N ~ ~ ~ O a ~ m ~ 3 Q i ~ o ~ > WV ~ ~ V Z Z = C ~ ~ ~ CO r r ~ O ~ -Nr r ~N In CD O v ~ ~ p M co ch ~ d N O~ l~A~ , ~ ~ ~ rN0 ~ CON CA ~ ~ ~ + ' v ~ 7 C7 C 1 C ~ t0 0000 O~ M w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q MGM .r.~to r N N ~ +• ~' V to Z Z ~ t a ~ F LA O~ i N O~ z W ~_ Q CC W_ H h W J V H h H J 0 V H Z v W 0 Z ~. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ h O O N O O ~ O O I~ O O M O O O O O O O to O O ~( ) r O ~ M O ~ CO O ~ O O t,C) ~ O t,C) Cfl to tf') ~ CO f~ 00 ~ O r N d' ~ (O N N N N N N N M M M M M M ~y i ~ o M ~ ~ o N r o r d' r c~ r ~ r CO r 1~ r 00 .- O r O N O O O o O O O O O O O o O O O o O O O O O O O o O O ~ ~ O 0 r~ O 0 am ~ ~ ~t O o r O 0 c~ O 0 ~ O 0 ~ O 0 ~ O 0 ~ O 0 to O 0 ~ O o ~ ~ r~ O h ~ ~ ~ M Cfl I~ M O O r N M ~ N N N N N N N N M M M M M H 0 M ~' ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r Oro ~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O N CO M O ~t N CO r ~ M ~ CO CO O 00 N ~ O M ~ ~ p ~ r r O O OD 1~ I~ M d7 Vf ~ ~ to CO 1` I~ M O O ~- d' N N N N N N N N M M M W i N o M r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o rn d u h 0 r N M ~' lf) CO I~ M O O r ~- r N r M r h Y ~ (OONCMO E 7 Q>00 E ~~N ~ M ~ M L ~ ~ ~ N ~ to CO fl. 0 0 O m rnoo co ~n ~n p N CO oo N (~ ~ I~ O r EA O M ~ M M N U c ~ _ ~ Y ~ M 00 f~ Q ~ N ~ X N ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N M M ~ U O N M (6 > + ~C N ~ ~ v ~n ~ ~t ~ M 0 L ~ ~ I ~ ~ O t0 a0 f~ O p d r~rno N N O N N O C ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~rn ~ (~ . O L R ~ ~ N ~ N ~ C (n ~ 0 ~ U j UD COO -~ ~ ~ E ~rN Q H O ~ N N N ~n ~ rn~ v ~ L rn U ~ r ~ O ~ m m ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U~U • ~ ~ Y U Y ~ ~ V O ~ O N W J O f6 O m ~ ~ (~ ~ it (~ NCG~OtD0~0 ~ C7f~ N00001Dr ~ Q v N ~ ~ CO CO C0 ~ r 0 v v v v t Q Z Z N o~ 0 0 0 0 0 rC70~1!)00 UWti r~a?a?NMOO ~~rrCh~~/Ch ~ W (~ , az }W ZN pp~~In000CO11')CD O~cONC*~I~Nt1y ~Q O~COCGO00 U W~ N r r r r W U YZ Q- W~ ~i~ o c J j r r r , ` ` / U YQ ~Z JJ QQ Or (~~P OOOr ~CDN W 000tt~I~ ZN C+7r 0r 0 0 0 ~ Q ~ ~_ F ~ ~~ ~ M ~ ~rM V YIY/I~ W ~; NchCric~chM07M Q Q Z J ZQ N 0 M0~ O O O ~(n p C D C 7 O L1')(Cr~rrNN V ' M 0 ~i ~i N M ~ N C ) ~c c MC c OC ~e o W a Y WJ 1"'Q I~coch~t c00DlnN ~ ~(A CD ChtP)CCrONI N OOrI~(hr Nr cnC7N N' N ~ MM N~ ~ ~ C @7f )C 7C Q W d. N OOrNM~~(p ~ ~~~~o~o~~~ W r OO~Or(V Ch~ln aooornrn~rno~rn ~ CnOO~CAOCAO r r r r r r r r } W J J a W Y Z Q Q O W Q N W Q J 0 U W N D Q ~' r (~ r CO rN~ In n r N ~ 'p c~*i e°~ e ~ i a ~ y N OON9 ~~ ~ ~ r N r N ~ ~ M c7 ~ O W ~ ~ O, ~ 000 N CD r~ t~ r al ~ ~ r r r N ~Q 1~0~7M O . A II1 ~ r . fn NVZ Z d ~ _ Q ~ H o~ M rn _O } LL \° 0 c*~ ~ rn~ r N ` O ~ ~ N a U C 0) - Q U_ N ' ~ W U C Q ~ W ,~ N ~ .~ W W •~ Q ~~ O U D W N O Q z (prr O~ ~ CO 1~ r o r N r ~ N In t0 00 v M Ch C+9 ~ d O NOS 0 ~[~ i ~ ~ r N AO OD N ~ ~ 1 _ ~i ~ CO C7 Ch ~ td 0000 O ~ ~ V 9 w r~ N ~,a ~ In c+ ~~~ v ~- m w ~ a o N ~ o N U Z Z d ~ s a ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ N~ O~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ O O O O O O ~ ~ Ln ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ I~ M O O O ~ M M O ~ M -_ ~ h Ln In ~!") CO I~ M O O ~ N ~ Ln (p :„ ~ 'k £ N N N N N N N M M M M M M ~ ~"" ' rn o 0 ~••• ,'~ ~ (~O o~0 N N ~ y j N d' ~ G N (V M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lf') CO I~ M O O L C r~ N ~ a ~ O c0 O M ~ r- ~ c- ~ (~1 Q ~ in N co O W ~ O ~ y ~ ~ rnoo O m coDa`noN > ' CO ' ~o~ y bF} M ch ~ M W O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q :.:=~ O O O O O O O O O O O O o ~ 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ H : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ Ln L(') Ln Ln l(') Ln l() OO ~ Y r ' Vf ; ~ N ~t N Ln N Cfl N Cfl N I~ N O N O N O M r M N M M M Ln M ~ ~ N O ~ ~' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ X ; ~ H ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- L -- ~ M o 0 m .a } N ~Y N M M M ~ O N H N ~ M ~ O i ~ M d' ~ O ti M O O ~ O t,() ~ r r r r r r r N ~ ~ ~+ Y C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d'~M 0 ~ L y ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 00 r O O O O O O O O O O O O "~ O ~ r rn o } ~ O N M ~ CO In Lf') ~ O Ln M N O N N N O Cfl O N ~- M Cfl O N O ~ r L ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O M ~ ti M O O ~ H d' ~ ~ O ti ti O O O ~ ~ .--. N N N N N N N N M M M ~ ~ ~ O rn y ~ Y a - ~ ~ a, ~ N J C (n ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ U O ,y~f,~ CV ~ N M ~ ~ M ~ W O ~+ N s ~ ~ ~ F ~~ ~ L U ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ` ~' V m H m ~, ~ ~ ~ W Y = ~ N M '~t In t0 f~ 00 O O ~ N M 0~ ~ o O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y v ~_' v >, U . z R Y U Y ~ ~ ~ Q ~ U~ Q C~ C ~ H m w J o n o m > ~ cn ~ W C~ V Q aN zo o= _~ ~N a~ Z ~_ z° W Y aZ ~o O~ V N 'C'~ .,.., .--, W H w O ~-+ ~~ Ow N~ W '-~ ~ W N ~ O F'' N ~ ~ W E-+ [--r W ~ ~~ W ~ ~ W O~ • ~ L~ W ~ ~ a ~ w~ U ~ W ~ W N S ~ A W W ~ ~ ~ ... A ~+ N p., w ~' ~ ~ w ~ W ~ W A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ W d W W ~ ~ ~ w 0 U ~i ~ ~ N ~ ~+ w v~ ~' W ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ U ~, ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ W ~ ~ p,, W w A A N ~ ~ w v~ N W N ~ ~ ~ A W ~ .~ W A W a~ " A a W ~ a a W ~, U w ~ ~ ~ x o E" ~ ~ o ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U W o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o O a~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ w .~ ~..., ~ E" W z 0 ~ ~ ,.; ~ w ~ ~ ~ a U W ~ ~ A~ ~ Q W ~ ~ '~ U ~ '"""' , s~ a '' w .~ W ~ ~ E~ W U a z 0 H z w 0 v .--a 'CS . ~.., .-~ W H H N '~ `~ p a ~ p E-~ a ~~ w ~ ow ~ ~ ~a Z qa 4 A p~ W ~ a0 ~ W Ow w M ~ Wa a a~ ~ a ~W a wz N O r~~ ~ ~~ ~ a ,= cv c%i r .. O O w W O a W H w H O h W C7 U d a z 0 H z w 0 U ~~/ F~ W A A ~~ O W ~ ~ ~ OA a~ .r.S ~ N ~ ~/ ~ W V ~ ~ ~ M •• ~ H ~ °~ ~-1 W ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ M ~ O~ ~ ~ N ''C~ .,.., -~ . r!1 ~ N ~ N ~ H .. M ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ `_'~ 0 N z O ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W w O U M N 'd ...., .--~ V1 W W U z w w w x H 3 ~ W ~ ~ H a~ r; w L~7 M a ~ a a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ °' O~~' --~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ M ~ W ~ ..~ ~-1Mao ~~o° ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ w~~ O ~ ~ W ~ e~ a ~ ~ A ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ N A N a a w w ~ z W zW w 3z A~ HW ~~ w Ems,., AO OW ~~ a~ ~~ p~ ~W a as aH 0 Az° ao ., ~., M ~ W U 0 z w O U ~' n ~' N W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ a O W W ~ W w ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ N W ~ N c ~" ~ ~ a ~ O W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ W W W ~ ~ ~ W W O ~ ~-' pa,,, ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W N ~ .. ° ~C ~ ~ W ~ A ~..1 O ~ A ~, `~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~= c j M ! ~ W L7 W A "C~ ...., .-~ W C7 v a z 0 z W O U O ^~ ~1 W W O A A ... A W A A W N .. W E-~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ O a~ a~ a~ W A A a r~ W ~ ~ w OA ~ ~z ~ ao ~ ~H W ~A A ~~ ~z z ° o ~a w o~ a • ~, Q ~ N W ~ a ~ N M ''d ...., ,--, W W L~ ~ ~ Fy ~ M ~ N ~ .. ~ i i a Z ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ,~ W W W w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 'C3 . ~.., .-~ V1 ~~ ~ ~ A ~~ A ~ ~„~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W H ~ ~ ~ ~ W a~ ~ ~ ~ A c ~' a,+ W W ~ ~ N W W U W O ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~"~ W °~~ ~ w~ ~~ .~ w ~a W ~~ w ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~~ F., ~W W ~ ~,,~ W ~ ~-1 ~ ~ pq p w ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ V W ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W 1 W A ~„~ ~ W o 'd' W A ~ ~ ~ W~" H O ~ ~ .~ ,,,,~ A ~ ~ ~ z ~ a ~"'~ N M W O U "C3 .... .--, a w H 0 a O a w A A a z 0 w a a a W o ~' c~ .~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ w w N ~ a ~ zw a w~ w Nwz ~ ~~w ~ ~~~ z www^ w a~~,~ow ~~~.~ ~ ~~~~ w O~N.~ p4 WOE s~ ~., ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~% ~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ App ~ PAZ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ N trj v~~, W N U 0 W t/1 Q E"~ H W z c~ z W a a o A ~ A V ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ W a L7 W A v a z 0 w O U 00 'Cj ...., .--~ a H z a O F A W O a w ~, A Z ~ ~ ,.a O O W a ~ o a a A ~ N a w O ~ .~ W ~ U °' W~ ~~ C-~ W ~~ A! W W ~W A~ ~ ~~ ~W A W O Z M N .--I a w F z w w H w as a ~. M ~ ~ a ,,..~ ~ A E-~ o A p., ~~ ~ W o N ~ ~ ~ '"~ ~ \° ~ ~ o . ,~ ~ `"~ v ~ E-~ ~ W ~= O h F~ ~ ,~ ~ A A~ ~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ WA ~ '-'O a~ ~H ~~ WN ~O ~~' ~~ O E-+ ~ O (-~ O~ °o ~ ~O ~o ~~ A!a Do oA W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ In ~ U a 0 Z W O V J ~ . ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS (Proposed 1993-94 Salary Scale) Step Yrs Scale On Scale Exp. 1993-94 4 5 6 1 1 0 1 24,700.00 \ 1 24,700.00 \ 2 24,700.00 2 \ 3 24,900.00 \ 3 4 25,475.00 4 4 5 6 26,100.00 26,100.00 ~ 4 7 26,100.00 4 \ 8 26,100.00 5 9 26,600.00 ~5 10 26,600.00 ~~ 5 11 26,600.00 5 \ 12 26,600.00 6 \ 13 27,500.00 7 \ 14 28,500.00 8 9 15 1 29 500.00 \ 10 6 30 500.00 \11 17 31 500.00 12 18 32 500.00 13 19 33,500.00 20 35,875.00 20+ 35,875.00 Employees with twenty or more years of credited experien receive an additional $600 er ear. ,+ ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS (Proposed 1994-95 Salary Scale) ~`~'."'* v, ... 'a~ . ~~ .. 'Y. '~',, . . ~s ti ..ae' .~.~~s . .., . ~ ... q' .. 'dead..,; ., , .. rya. +„ as : a ., }~....: '.',',a.. 4.., e >a~e...". .. .. _ '. . a 'aa aaa. ~ °aaa~'.;~°w ,.,~ a a .. ... ...... j 1 0 24,700.00 1 0 25,200.00 500 00 1 1 24,700.00 1 1 25,200.00 . 500 00 1 2 24,700.00 1 2 25,200.00 . 500.00 2 3 24,900.00 2 3 25,400.00 700.00 3 4 25,475.00 3 4 25,700.00 800.00 4 5 26,100.00 4 5 26,300.00 825 00 4 6 26,100.00 . 4 4 7 26,100.00 5 6 27,000.00 900.00 8 26,100.00 5 7 27,000.00 900.00 5 9 5 8 27,000.00 900.00 5 26,600.00 5 9 27,000.00 900.00 10 26,600.00 5 11 26,600.00 6 10 28,000.00 1 400.00 5 12 26,600.00 6 11 28,000.00 , 1,400.00 6 ~ 3 6 12 28,000.00 1,400.00 27,500.00 7 14 28,500.00 7 13 29,050.00 2,450.00 8 15 7 14 29,050.00 1,550.00 29,500.00 9 16 30,500.00. 8 15 30,150.00 1,650.00 10 17 31,500.00 9 16 31,350.00 1,850.00 11 18 32,500.00 10 17 32,650.00 2,150.00 ~ 2 19 33,500.0 11 18 34,050.00 2,550.00 13 20 35,875.00 12 19 35,550.00 3,050.00 20+ 35,875.00 13 20 36,650.00 3,150.00 20+ 36,650.00 775.00 Employees with twenty or more years of credited experience receive an additional $600 per year. s r Roanoke County Schools Salary History: BA Comparison Current $ Constant $ Scale Change Scale Change 1985-86 Scale 199495 Scale 9495 over'85-86 9495 over'85-86 Step BA BA Amount Percent Amount Percent 1 $17,050 $25,200 $8,150 47.8 $1,346 7.9 2 17,050 25,200 8,150 47.8 1,346 7.9 3 17,050 25,200 8,150 47.8 1,346 7.9 4 17,050 25,400 8,350 49.0 1,492 8.8 5 17,578 25,700 8,122 46.2 1,183 6.7 6 18,122 26,300 8,178 45.1 1,077 5.9 7 18,667 27,000 8,333 44.6 1,043 5.6 8 19,266 27, 000 7, 734 40.1 444 2.3 9 19,921 27,000 7,079 35.5 (211) (1.1) 10 20,625 27,000 6,375 30.9 (915) (4.4) 11 21,334 28,000 6,666 31.2 (894) (4.2) 12 22, 099 28, 000 5, 901 26.7 (1, 659) (7.5) 13 22,968 28,000 5,032 21.9 (2,528) (11.0) 14 23,920 29,050 5,130 21.4 (2,714) (11.3) 15 25,020 29,050 4,030 16.1 (3,814) (15.2) 16 25,020 30,150 5,130 20.5 (3,011) (12.0) 17 25,020 31,350 6,330 25.3 (2,135) (8.5) 18 25,020 32,650 7,630 30.5 (1,186) (4.7) 19 25,020 34,050 9,030 36.1 (164) (0.7) 20 25,020 35,550 10,530 42.1 931 3.7 21 25,520 37,250 11,730 46.0 1,672 6.6 Based on $.73/1.00 (i.e 1994-95/85 -86) See Step 1 $25,200 x 73% _ $18,396 $18,396 -17,050 = $1346 r Roanoke County Schools Salary Nls~ory: MA Comparison Current ~ Constant a Scale Change Scale Change 1985-86 Scale 199495 Scale 9495 over'85-86 9495 over'85-86 Step MA MA Amount Percent Amount Percent 1 $18,160 $26,310 $8,150 44.9 $1,046 5.8 2 18,160 26,3.10 8,150 44.9 1,046 5.8 3 18,160 26,310 8,150 44.9 1,046 5.8 4 18,160 26, 566 8,406 46.3 1,233 6.8 5 18,688 26,921 8,233 44.1 964 5.2 6 19,232 27,540 8,308 43.2 872 4.5 7 19,777 28,280 8,503 43.0 867 4.4 8 20,376 28,280 7,904 38.8 268 1.3 9 21,031 28,280 7,249 34.5 (387) (1.8) 10 21,735 28,280 6,545 30.1 (1,091) (5.0) 11 22,444 29,332 6,888 30.7 (1,032) (4.6) 12 23,209 29,322 6,123 26.4 (1,797) (7.7) 13 24,078 29,332 5,254 21.8 (2,666) (11.1) 14 25,030 30,437 5,407 21.6 (2,811) (11.2) 15 26,130 30,437 4,307 16.5 (3,911) (15.0) 16 26,130 31,593 5,463 20.9 (3,067) (11.7) 17 26,130 32, 849 6, 719 25.7 (2,150) (8.2) 18 26,130 34,204 8,074 30.9 (1,161) (4.4) 19 26,130 35,659 9,529 36.5 (99) (0.4) 20 26,130 37,215 11,085 42.4 1,037 4.0 21 26,630 38,960 12,330 46.3 1,811 6.8 O U I C ~ I NNMOOpptDOr~O M O I V j Y 0 I __ 1 ~ ~ ( ~ 1 r.cptptp~~ntDCDO>O r~tptp~ ~t ~~~~ ~ ~` I I ~ ^ ~. 1 ~ j ~ ~ L I I m I I I E I 7 100000000000 tD t 1 0 O~ O H ~O tD ~ I E I oooo~noooo~M o~ p <D O tp 1 3 1 0 0~ O ti O *~ .- 1~ ~~ O O I E I O>'OtO~f~N N N N N N Of M I ' E l ~ a~1~CONOfCfMr~ r ~..>' I r l w w w w w w w w w w w w }~ I r l w w w w w w w w w w w C I C I ~~AtOCDOfrNNNNN M C 1 X I rMlnOfr~la7tAl~OCf r O ~ l r I~ l rrrrrN N N N N N l y N O I b I NNNNMMI'7MMMM ~ y Z 1 2 1 y y a I C I tONOf tpM~~~r~~ O C j C l OAMrOOD~ 01NMN N I j O ti tp tp. tp ~D O O ti c0 M M riD 1A O ~O r,A 1[1 f~ P• 1~ N f~ t0 O fr ^ ~~ O ' ~ i U I 1 I U I I 1 1 I 'r I E I O O O O O O O O O O O O T I E 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ ~ _ Y I E I OO~Ntp000~N0 ~ Y I E I M1AfDON1LYr,CItAr~OfOf tr C l r l w w w w w w w w w w w w C l r l w w w w w w w w w w w CO I C I M1ntD WQ>rrrNM~ tG QO I X 1 r M~OfrMMM~1Af0 Of L I r I r r r r r N N N N N N N L I a I N N N N M M M M M M M M LL I d l y y LL I S l y y I Y I I Y I I C I Of Off'7NN~ODOMOpiD tG I C i Mf~O~ONrr-<D~AeftA Qf I ~C I r M MMMN~ I ~O I MMM~ta7~OMMMMN N ~ ~ } I I >+ I 1 ~ I • 1 N I '~ 1 I ~ I U I 1 E I oooo~~noo~ou~ ~n 1 v I E I oooooou~u~ooo 0 1 7 1 0 1n 1n (O ~G r N 1n r f~ 1~ ~ 1 O I 0 1L'1 CO ~O M N N~ N f~ ~ N E 1Ar1n/~170rNrr!>Dti ~ ~ i E I N W O~1ASt~~M~47 Q1 ~ i i r w w w w w w . w r l w C I ~~OOfONM~u7~ID OD ~ 1 X I r- M to ~p 00 Cf O Metf~Qf N ~ i r I r r r r N N N N N N N N lC I ~C I N N N N M M M M M M 'CT ~1 fn I ~ I y ~A O l ~ l y y } 1 Y I } I Y I ~ I C I OO<DONO<D~u)O1D ~ ~ I C I +-N*~OS~OfMan-~OO r C I td I r r ('7 ~' N M M M M N V C I ~ I ~ M '~ t1 In 1[') (D t0 c0 (O (D f~ 7 1 1 7 1 1 O I I O I I U I I U I I d I E i OO~CO~OM00000 O N I E I ~ ON~CDM~tnMMO O ~C I ~ I O~~ 00~7MQ~0>000 +- Y I ~ I `~ NNpO1~NN~f~~A t0 O I E I ~O ~ oOf~CONNOP-N M O I E I ti00~D00Q~anOQN O~ EO I C 1 ~tiOOrNMM~~~ ~D d0 I T X I NtnP-Ofr M~~lt[Yt01- Cn Q I r I ~ r ~ ~ N N N N N N N N O I l0 I N N N N M M M M M M M M ~ I ~ I •9 y ~ I S I N y Q ~ I Y I C I ~ ti M ~~ ~~ ~ M ~p r M I I Y I C I r~Orppip.-Mt0~0 O .- N N f'7 M c0 ~A ~D ~D ~ ~ to M N ~t R ~ t0 tD c0 10 cp tp 1~ L W +~ 1 ~ I +~ 1 ~ I '~ 1 v i I i U I 1 I I E O D W Nvo~~MO~~'' OtOtO c0 Q I E I NM ~ o0af 000>NO~ Os ~ = Y 1 7 1 r 00 N O r;0 f~ to 1A CV 1~ ~ Q Y I 3 I r ~ to ti O M N N t[9 f~ 10 <D~<D tD Of O U O I E I Mf'1rCh~Or~COi~M 00 O I E I Mr;D0r01pf~pt0 w Z ~ tC0 I .r C I ~Atpp00fO~NNNM~ ~ C I c0 I T 1 X I ~-N~~toOf• M~nr-O p 1 r I r r r r N N N N N N N ~ ~ i ~ i ~ N N M M M M M M M M M y tr ~ I S I y L Q U J L c0 a to W I I ~n W I w I 1 I 'n fn ' I !r 4 I ~ (D 1~ 00 Of O r N M ~ 1n <T ~' I I M t0 f~ W O O r N M of to s !T N . W C7 1 I 00 a0 a0 00 00 O~ C> Qf O Cf Of I C7 I I a0 (10 00 oD 00 Of Cs Q1 Qf 01 O l l l l l I '~ tr = W 1 U D I i L I l l l l l l l l l l l B tc') iD I- W Of O ~ N M~ ~ O> W I D I I L 1 ~ l l l l t l ~~ <p 1~ O Q- O r- N M I OO GO CO 00 OD 00 Os Of 01 Qf 01 C- W lC I d I OO CD CD W 00 00 0>' Qf Cs 01 Qf p O O Qf Of Cf Of 01 O~ 01 Oi Q I Q I 1 Q1 I Of pf 01 Cf Of Of fT Of C1 Qf Q~ ~ W ~ Q I F- CD I } I •-r.-~-rr-~r~rr g m 1 } I rr.-r-.-rrr r~r- r I Y I I Y I O I C I O fO N pp ~ Of N tD 00 O 1 C I~ r 0 W tD iD M tG tp O I C I GD aO ~O N~ .- r~ O U I a0 1 tptpf-I~I~ti0>pp GO U I Ri l NNN~tA1pQ~0 O U I /0 I ~t1~ ~~ ~~M ~ } I ~ I } j ~ j 1~ 1 L I I L I I = 1 I m I I m 1 I I I O~AO~B~O>rM GO 1 I O~[f OO0OC0~0 r I 1 O1AOO0O~M OD I L I OP•ONNef ON N I L I OtiOOOti ON M I L I Of~Orr~.1p~ ~ O I 1• 1 OONODOCf rip M O I } 1 I~CDNOOI~N~A N ~ i} i 1-apNp~p~ Mrs r C I O 1 NM~~~~1n~A 1- C I O I OrifNNrrr M C 1 0 1 C>'ret47~I~OQf r ~ I r l ~NNNNNNN M ~( N I NMMMMMMM M O I M I NMMMf7MMM of N 2 1 I N y } } } i~ I ,L 1 C I C 1 ON~A GDO~AO>'r O C I C I 1n ~tn1~N1~f~N M C I C I OGpf~ NOlilriD Of ~ I a0 I OOONMNOO 1~ 7 1 l0 I t~1~01rNNNN r ~ I Ri I fD1Alnf~l~l~f~~p ~ U j~ i r r r r r r V i m; r r r r r r O I d' I I I U I 1 C I 1 I I 1 1 00000000 O r l 1 0000000 'ir r I I OOOOOOOf~ 1~ I L I 00000000 O •- I L I 00000000 O r- I L I OOOOOOOr~ 1~ Y (}• I -~MOtDr NNN /~ C i } i '~t~Ir~1~0f N1~ N = i } i ON1p1D1A 100fCf ~ C i I •~ .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ 10 1 ONMNNM~O 1~ ~0 I O I tDOQ/Of~l~ WCO r W I O 1 OfrMMM •~1[)t0 Os L- I r I N N N N N N N N N L I N( N N N N N N N N M L I M I N M M M M M M M M W I I N N LL I I N N LL 1 I N r- IY 1 I Y I 1 Y 1 I C I O>'O>OOrrMQ r ( C I NC'1(DNI~MNQ'~ N I C I tOrOGO~ Mf>ON ~ I a0 1 rrrrrr r 1 l0 ( NNNNrrr r I Q' ~ ~~AtD~MMNN N } 1 ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~+ I I ~ I I 1~ 1 1 +~ I I r 1 I r U I i OtL~1J7o~[) 0O~ to U 1 1 OoO~O~~O O U I I oOO~~nOOO O I L I N-~Nf7f~ Nf>DI~ tf I L I cOC'7NNONMf~ tr I L I tpMNN~ Nl~tn N 0~1 j} j O~~OpOrpfO O E I } I CO~Aef~<OOr~ t[1 ~ ; } i COt[»~a0M~00 Cf •~ IO I t0r~Of CfOf OOfO N ~ 1 0 1 OfrMtl~MtiODCf r •" I O 101rMIAtD 00 C/O N ~ Ir I NNN NNMNN M ~ I N 1 NMMMMM MM ~ ~ 1 M I NMMMM MME of M I I N N O I I N N N 1 I N N ~- I Y I ~+ I Y I N I C 1 0 0/ OD OD 1~ 1~ M 1n N ~ I C I ti O ~O N <D ~ r f~ r y I C 1 01 O O r Q 1n <D ~ ti C I Rf 1 Mc")eT-nGpf~~fJC+7 ~ C I t0 I NC'')NMNNNr N C I l0 I ~~~tOt0 tO~Otp ~p ~ I~ I 7 1 1 O j~ l O I I U I I U I 1 U I I I I 1 I O I I 1DtiNMOf M O O N Q1 I I ~GOc7tn~AMtOO O C1 1 I '~tODM~A~MtAO> 0 .Y I L I ~">'O~D~D~O>O0 M Y I L( OOI~NN~f~1n <O ~C I L I COOt~NN ~-~t0 tD C i~- i NrO fhQ rtDO M O 1 ~- I (DMQInIA1L')ON O O 1 ~- 1 tOO~t[)1pln~{D O e0 1 0 1 M ~ to ~A of ~ tO C0 Qf 10 1 O 1 Q1 r M ~ Q 1n 1[') 1~ O Q 1 O I Of r M ~ ~ u7 tp f~ O Q' I~ I NNNNNNNNN N -•O I N I NMMMMMMM M Q I M I NMMMMMMf+7 M r- ~ I I N N ~ I I N y I Y I I Y I S I C 1 f'7 N N ~D 1n r O r r I C I O 1[') r 1 C( Cf f~ 1[) Of N~~ f~ cD +~ I Q' 1 Q et cD ~ ~ ~ f'7 ~ 1n ], r Of <D ~ M 10 I I r 1~ I r.--~MNNNN N ~. I t0 1 M~(pIn<DC0tptC7 <p r +~ I O' I U 1 I U I 1 U I I I I 1 I N I I ~ONr OOOONf~ A m I 1 OO0>OOu~NC7 M N I 1 OOC7.•OOONCf ~ Y I L I Of to h. M th O t! CO 'tl0 Y I L I .- pp M N~~~ ~p ~p Y I L I ti Cp M N N 1n f~ tp tD C i } i 1A Qf cC O Of f~ N f~ O O I } 1 !~ O) ~f t0 Cp GO ~ N 1[7 ~ ; } i r O O tp tD ~O ~ tp O C I I ~C I O I Nf7~tAanlOf~1~ O l0 1 0 1 Or' N~c')st~cD 1~ lQ 1 0 1 OrN~~f ~ACOt~ 00 O l r I N N N N NNNN N O I N I MMMMML•7MC'~ M O I M I MMMMMMMC'1 M ~ I I N N ~ 1 I N N ~ I I N y W 1 I W I I W I I W I I ~ W I I to ~ I I OOtAOrNM~~ p> ~ 1 1 G0OO•"NM~1A 01 O-' I I QOOfOrNM~tA 01 C7 I i c~aornrnrnrnrnrn 1 C7 1 1 DOOC1Cf0)Of Of 0> I C7 1 I oDaornofrnrnv>rn I W 1 11 I I I I 1 I 1 '~7 W I I I 1 1 1 I I I I R W I I I 1 I I I I 1 I of 0 1 L I f•ODfTOrNM~ Qf Q I L 1 f~OOfOrNM'ir O D I L I tiOCfO r NMI O I /0 ( GOOOC?lOfOOO 1 l0 I ODOOOfOICSOf O~ 1 t0 100W000f CfCfOfQf m i y i o~a~rnrno,rnrno~ a a 1 m I rnrnrnrnrnrnrna~ a Q I a>' 1 o, o,a>v>v>v,o>'o~ a r' r- ~- r r ~-- r r ~ Cd I} I r ~- r r r r ~- r ~ m l} I r r r r r r r ~ ~ t.i. S AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T$E ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 RESOLIITION 12495-9 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVB MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE• Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session r ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~") AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Summary of 6th Annual Virginia Water and Sewer Rate Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I am enclosing the Draper Aden Associates Report in your agenda packet. BACKGROUND' Draper Aden Associates, an engineering firm from Blacksburg, Virginia, has been preparing a survey of water and sewer rates in Virginia for the past six years. The study is performed for VACO and the Virginia Municipal league. The purpose of this report is to allow municipalities to track trends in water and sewer rates, connection fees, etc. and has become a major resource for answering these questions. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1994 survey was mailed to 461 municipal and private systems with a response from 214 systems. The staff has attempted to categorize Roanoke County with other utilities of similar size. Below is a chart comparing Roanoke County with other utilities serving more than 10,000 customers. WATER Total Connections Daily Consumption (GPD) Rate/5,000 Gallons Connection Fee Availability/ Off-Site Fee RANGE AVERAGE ROANORE COUNTY 10,070 - 200,000 43,703 15,813 2,500,000 - 24,000,000 13,900,000 6,000,000 $6.31 - $23.93 $13.62 $21.90 $20 - $3,502 $839.14 $500 $200 - $3,502 ~ $1,906 ~ $2,560 ~~ SEWER Total Connections RANGE 10,000 - 153,326 20,000 - 30,000,000 $5.23 - $25.17 $20 - $4,877 AVERAGE 38,367 2,700,000 $13.57 $1,329.65 ROANORE COUNTY 12,643 5,000,000 $12.51 $100 Off-Site Fee I $500 - $4,201 1 $2,250.171 $1,000 For all categories in water and sewer, Roanoke County falls within the listed ranges. Daily Flow (GPD) Rate/5,000 Gallons Connection Fee Availability/ The Roanoke County water rates exceed the average mainly because many of the established cities have very low rates. For instance, the City of Roanoke is at the low end of the range at $6.31. Many of the counties similar to Roanoke County are also above the average of $13.62. Roanoke County falls below the average in all instances for sewer. Even when the off-site fee increases to $1,500, we will still be well below the average of $2,250.17. RECOMMENDATION: This report is submitted for informational purposes and no action is requested. SUBMITTED BY: - - Gary Ro rtson, P.E. Utility irector Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: APPROVED: ~l-~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs N N tT b >;, b b U1 •,~ A b b N d CT ~d s~ ~d ro W O s~ 0 rn .,~ 0 U to LT N b U ~'1 N O U O a b .,~ b U CT •rl U1 ~I QI N N N O tT s~ «f N .,~ Ca N O Ri ro W b ro O Q~ r~i ~ ~ a~ N ~ ~~ U td }-+ N ~ ~, ~ O ~ •~ ~ ~Ul W ''1 N .ri U W 3~ N~ ;~ ~ U ~ +~ U ,~ U N N d O ~~ 9~ ~ ~ )~ ~ ~ ~ 3 •~b-~~~~ W W ~ U 3 ~+•~-1 O 1~-I +~ N •rI ~C W O •~+ ~ cA N Ul fs+ ~ 3 ~ ~ N Cr 'd !~-i s~ ~ ~ ~J N O O N Ul N P 3 ~ ro U ~ U I N Ul~. Ul ~-I N ri ~ N ~ ~ •r•I «3 O U r-I N ~ r-I Ul •r1 ~ ~ 7t ~ ~ 41 ~ ~1 ~ .Q •r•I ~., ~.~ •r1 Q) ~ .7'1 t2~ +~ +~ A O +~ N N U I~ ~ ~ +~ ?~ O 1~-i Sa N O +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~- rn v ~ 'd Ul •~ ~ Ul ~ ~ ~ O I d r ~ ~-+ -~ +~ • ri RS U U Ul N W ?~b ~ ~ ~ N~•riZ3 U ~ N O ~ d S-~ O U Ul ~ U UI b' its O O b ~ N f~ d U .~ .~ 'd ~ W C7 • • W o U Sa U E-~ •~ >:1, s N ~ N ~ !; N ~ •rI W N ~ a N ~, av ~ ~ ~ H N o ~ ~ w ~ O ro U N ,~ ~ cd O N .s~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ k•N ~ U W O N ~ ~ O ~ N O ~ U ~ ~ U fA ~ O W •r-I r-I ~ •r•I ~ v}a~OroO ~ ~ N ~U1 N N U Ul ~ ~I •ri O ~ U U )~•~ a~Ua.~H~ N ~ a i ~ a i ~ s~ +~ ° ~ • ~ ~ r-I .1~ O ~ U •rl O A ~ ro d ~ - +~ ' ~ [d ~ ~ W ~ U .~ • '+-i 'd 3 ~ U • N •• r-{ ~ 'd ~ ~-1 •r•i 'd O N •rl O ~ ~ U ~ ~s~ W N U O I~ O O I~ I O ~ W ~ tT 1-i ctf U .~ N U1 ~ N U O ul ~ -t ~ t d 'd 3 ~ .1-~ O O O O N U ~ ~ >~ N ~ .C2 }-a ~ U • .1-) W ~ N ~ ~ U a..~ •r-I W i7' •~-1 cd cd O ~ ro O N to U 3 ~-+ (n .~ .,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-I 'd fCS •r-I >m •~ a Z3' W m~ r-I N ~ ~ O -~ ~ N ~ • ZS ~ >~~ ~ro ~ ~ U U • 7r • rl .L; r-I W U N +~ W ~ SZ N •,.~ N ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ •r -I ~ fC ~ •'~ a~ a ~~~ ~ ro N N ~ O N •~ >~ •~ 3 S2 >~ N 'd U ,~I~a•~ ~ cd'd~~ N U Ri •,..I ,LZ f`t a~ ' ~ •~ ~ .~ ~ A U +~ >s ~ }..~ cC N ~~ O O +~ O ~ •~ a..~ W •~ I~ N S2 to >~, U N O O~ U ~ ~a iaa~ ~ s~ f-I ,C~ ~ ~ ~ r-I '~ r-I (l~ 'dcdb"W aY 3 N ,~ +~ W U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~-I ~ .~ -r-i ,f~ ~-I ,~ N •rl W W ~d U O O O' !~ O Ul ~ c~ O C7 O •,.~ U ~ U 3 ~ s .~-{ S-1 ~. O 'r7 ~ ~1 k k .,~ .,~ [~ W N ~ ~ ~ ~a -~ ~ ~~ Q 56Z'6$ 009'£$-00'56$ aa3 ~llll!gel!eny 80.'0$ :uope~ gad %$$ ' 2599-88L 1408) 5L9L-0LZ (4081 00'06[$ 000'£$-00"5L$ aa3 uo!loauuo~ a6~ey~ a6eaanbr sa!luno~;o sa~e!aossy uapy.~ade~a ZL'96$ E9'EE$-E6'E$ suolleJ 000'5 /algid uo!le!aoSs~y e!u!6~!n ~al~ed •.~ eu1 -990'ZEE'L 000'000'SE-000'EOZ IadJ1 Mol3 ~I1ea hoduanea uall3 '3d 'al9q!ad '1 Pa~3 6Z6'Z 9Z8'E-L4D'6 suo!laauuo~ lelol oN • a6e~an y a6ue~ :~annag • 6[48-649 (ti08) VbbO-Z55 (EDU saA . an8ea~ led!a!unW e!u!6~!n sale!aossd uapd aadead 05'496$ OOb'b$-05'9$ aa3 /~~!I!gel!eny 6uo~ XuaB,. •3:d 'uapy •y we!II!M Z9'E65$ 966'.6$-00'0£$ ae~ uo!laauuo~ • 9.Z'96$ 00'8£$-6£'9$ suolleJ 000'5 / alea }Ueld ;uaua;eaal as;enna;seM' :~~$.~UO~ ZOZbSL 000'065'86-000"ZE Idd~- ;e pa;daoabr a;eyaea~ uo!ldwnsuo~ AI!ea 6E6Z 008'£-9[0'6 • suo!laauuo~ le~ol • • • t a6e~any a6ue}~ ~a}eM ti0'0$ :uo~~e~ gad %6L • • suo;;oauuo~ 000'ti-1;00'6 a6aey~ aBeaanbr LO'966'l$ 000'4$-05'[$ aa3 ~(1!I!gel!eny oN Ll'05Z'Z$ 60Z'b$-005$ aa3 ~l!I!gel1eny E5'bb8$ 000'£$-OD'06$ aay uo!laauuo~ 59'6ZE'6$ L•L8'b$-OZ$ aay uo!hauuo~ 65'86$ 40'14$-6b'S$ : suolleJ 000'.5/ales ^ L5'E6$ L6'9Z$-EZ'S$ suolleJ 000"5 /ales ObE'b66 - 000'SZ6'b-000'SZ (QdJ1^^o13 A1led sad • 5Z5'Z89'Z . ,000'000"0E-000'OZ {4dJ) ^^013 AI1etJ 094 596-5 suo!laauuo~ jelo,~ L9E'8E 9ZE'£56-000'06 suo!laauuo~ ~elol a6e~and a6ue~ aannag ;ueld ;uaw;eaaj as;enna;seM a6e~and a6ue~ ~an~ag }H Pa;da~ad aGe;da$ 00'490'5$ 000'006$-54'£$ ` aa3 Al!I!gelieny - ' 906'6$ Z05'£$-00'.OOZ$ aa3 ~i{!ge~!eny • 00'969$ 000'£$=00'0!$ aa3 uo!laauuo~ jpa~daood a;ey~ea~/aBe~das 46'6£8$ Z05'E$-00'OZ$ aa3 uoilaa~uo~ Z6'S6$ 95$-8Z'6$ suolleJ 000'5'/ ale~3 Z9'E6$ E6'EZ$-56'9$ . suolleJ 000'5 / a}ed 56['856 OOQ'000'i-000'E8 ' (adJ) L99'l6E'6 000'000'bZ-000'005'Z •(adJ) uo!ldwnsuo~ ~(l!ed uoildwnsuo~ /~I!eQ 96E Ob6-Z suoilaauu0~ lelol •4~Dd ao~naag o~~dnd .EOZ'Eb _ 000'OOZ-OLO'O6 su0!laauuo~ lelol a6eaan~ a6ue~ aa~eM ' a6e~any a6ue~ aa1eM aay;O •;dad sad;~~~;n suo~;aauuo~ 000' 6 uey; canna j ~ . ' suoi;~auuo~ +L00'OL 006. L56 lelol a;eniad ^ s~ala;std tae;iueg ^ 95'64['6$ L50'b$-OOZ$ aa3 %1!I!gej!eny 86 8Z suo!laauuo~ +000'06- . 6£'540'6$ 05Z'E$-05$ aa3 uo!hauuo~ 56 EZ 000'06-600'4 • 55'V6$ 96'ZZ$-05'4$ suolleJ 000'5 /ales 5Z Oti b00'ti-600`6 bELEObZ .000"000'ZE-000'064'6 (adJl^^o13 A11ea Zb 99 000'6 ueyl aanna3 668'9 !£9'6-000"b suo(#aauuo~ 6elol % sluapuodsaa # •uuo~ •saa;o ~agwnN a6eaany._ a6ue~y ~aroiag aaMas %6L 9Z'96b'6$ 55L'Z$-OOZ$ aa3 Al!j!gel!en+y 006 966 I~lol 95'056$ 008'Z$-086$ aa3 uo!laauuo~ Z6 bZ suo!l0auuo~ +000'06 80'Z6$ E6'8Z$-5Z'b$ suolleJ 000'5 /alel3 Z6 EZ • 000'06-600'V 9ZE'E8L 8L6'666'S-000'OOE'6 (adJ) 6Z 95 000'4-600'6 uoildwnsuo~ AI!ea Lb E6 0006. ueyl•aanna3 LEL'9 005'6-5£6'4 suo!10auua~ lelol ' % sluapuodsaa # •uuo~ `sa}3 }o aaquanN - • a6e~an y a6ue~j ~aleM aaleM %Z',C %Z•9 %L•L suoi;oauuo~ 000'01« -600'ti suo~~auuo~.~o ~agwnN Aq asuodsaa • _ . . • • ;uauaaBeuew suaa~sAg ~~~~~~n r ~ ,,~. , OD~OOZ'lS 900:961 5Z~915 5Z~91S L8 b9b 90090'1$ ODO'OZS 00~51S 0051$ ZLl bdl'l V~S 0118Hd ~00 300188008 000055 OOOOIS lbZlS 8E8 £79'ZC DD099'ZS 000055 099'000'5 ECIZ$ 901'1 818'5! /~1Nf1003XON'd0~1 000085 000'000'9£ - 16~L5 6118 - 090`065`8! Z9ZlS lE~9S OZ l'8 - d0 A110'3~DNt1D8 - 000'090'5! - - .A1180H1(lb a3M35 ON7 831VM bNNVA18 OOOOb'ZS 000'00£'67 8E6ZS LlSZS Sll'6 086'[4 00008'!5 0£0'9 95OZS LStrIS Z£Z'Ol 66745 dO~IlID'ONOWHOIH - - - - 90000'85 888'9[ 05815. OO ll5 lb LL8 30 NMOl'NOlONIW38 - - - - 00 05[5 008'86 80915 LZb -, 00 l331b'M NIt11N00W O'd3y OO~OOE'ZS lsoo 000'OOZ'l 998£5 99~£ES b5l 855'Z 00~008'ZS iso~ 000'004'! OE~LIS 06~L15 5b£ 06C£ AlIHOH1f1V3~I~d3SNVI01ddH DD~OOZS DO~DSbS ~ 000'059'! - _ 58~91S trb8 008'7 DOOOZ$ .00'0645 000'0111'Z - 5665 bbE 90b~b 3D ,IlIJ'08DjD~l 000004$ OOOOI$ 000'SZl'b -0E 085 5.1.51$ 9bl 5lL -00~000'b$ 00'00!$- - Ob-L~ OL-8l$ 456 ZZL dONM01'3lllAll30afld - 00'OOZ$ 000'OEZ'Z Z6'Sb$ 96~ZZ$ E9E LZ6'£ add 00`0[4$ 000'000'£ 85'lZ$ 6L'Ol$ 88E L85'b d0 NM01'IXSt/lpd - .00'00£$ - - OO~EI$ . 801. 459 - - - - - - - AiISjOH1f1t1301Ati9S AlNf10D l?ISt/lfld - 00'005$' - 05'ZZ$ 05'ZZ$ 5Z lEZ 09'9 00'05£$ - 00'lZ$ 00'lZ$ Z9l 9L6'Z. A1NflOD IXSt/lfld 00'[[8'4$ - 000'008'5! - 8L'6l$ 050'Z . 000'LE 00'Z05'E$ 00'Z05'£$ 000'005'£! - ZE'Ol$: 08U'Z . 005'LE 't1'Sd AlN(100'W`dIl11M 30N1l-d 00'005'Z$ - .000"095 - 04'lZ$ OE 896"t 00'006$ lsoo - - 05'lL$ OZ ZOb't. A1Nf10039!l03930NIad - - - - - - - 00'096$ 000'8£ - Z0~81$ - 8ll ~~~DNI SXaOM a31t1M NtJ1dHMOd - 00~05Z$ 009'[9! Ob'lE$ 04'EZ$ .- Ely - - -00'05Z$ 000'00£ 9b'9Z$ 8l'Ll$ ll 06L 30 fV-MOl'ONfIOd 00'05!$ 00099$ - - ~ 9E'S$ 569 005'6Z - 00'005$ 000'09Z'Ll 88'Ll$ 00'El$ 003 000'1£- d0 A110 "H1f10WSla0d - -- - .~ - - - - 000915 Z9C51 0085 0085 bl 98 ~ - 30 NM01'lV1,Odl>30d 09'990'£5 - OOEIS OOBIS Lbl l08'E - dD~1110'NOSOODDd - 005Z1S 000'ZZl 65 L8S 65 L£5 6l DOZ OD00£S 000'05! 65 L8S 65[85 6l DOZ d0 NMOl'Sb'1NOHbOOd - - 0005ZS - 00955 8 bZl 30 NMOl'XIN3Hd 00~05ZS 000'900'9 96~ZZS 87115 95Z'l L50'9l 00~05ZS 96~ZZS 87115 95Z'l L90`9l d0 A110 `08H8S8313d - - 000585 OOD'O8Z L88ZS [5815 OE Ol5 30 NM01'3~088W3d - OOObLI 76~7ZS SZ~bIS L£l lE6 - 00095 000'[£8 59~1ZS 98~Z1$ - Bbl Z08'l 30 NM01'OHf18Sll1V3d - - - - 005SW 000'Zl D9Zl$ l L6 3D NMOl ,1110 NIld6N~d tiVA 000`OES 00455 00~9Z$ 8£Z lZl'l ~ tItCA - bEZ`Z5l'l OO~bBS DO~bIS 66Z L54'l 30 NMDl'39NtflfO - - 000'OOZ'l ~ 09'£5$, OL'EZ$ 05ti- 009"l - 00'04$ 000"OOO;I 08'9Z$ 0851$ l5E 05L'l 30A110'NOll~ON - 00'05Z$ - - Ll'8$ 000'£ OOb'Z9 - 00~5Z5$ 000'000'ZL OCEI$ OL'El$ 000'4 000'£9 30 AlID'XlD3a0N - - - - - - - - - 00:05£$ - 00'El$ OO~II$ OOl OOE 30 NM01'3llI~Sl3X01N - 00'05L'Z$ 000'00['9! EZ:S$ EZ~S$ 006'! 981'[4 00'EE9$ 00'069$ -, 000'00!'!5 6E~ll$ 6E~ll$ bbE'Z 85£'£14 d0 Ai10'SM3N 1lfQdM3N - - - .56'6£$ b9~9Z$ U6 084 - - 000'ZLb 5L'OZ$ Z8'El$ O6 lZ9 30 NMOl'13~Ilit/W M3N ;ow/00`5$ 00'000'!$ - 00'8Z$ 00'OZ$ bE 8L6'l 'ow/05'E$ 00'000'!$ - OL'9l$ 5Z'Ll$ 45 lbl'Z ~ A1Nf100 NOSl3N 00'009'!$ - 000"OEl SI~bZ$ Ol'9l$ 6 108 00"000'1$ - 000'OOZ 0051$ 00'01$ Zi 108 30 NMOl'NOS~IOt/f'1Nf10W - 00'OOZ'l$ - - - El Oll - 00'000't$ 6LL'ZL OE-lE$ OE~IE$ •Ol Oll 3D NINOl'Oa03Md!!O lNfIOW - OO~OOb$ 000'054 - 5Z'lZS Ll OEO'l - 00~05b$ 000'0!4 - 00'4Z$ bZ OLb'l AlNfIOD Aa3W0[l1NOW ' - - - - - 8V~ - - Zl OZS ll lZl .«" ONI NOIlVIJDSSV t~31tfM Oa08111W 00 5ZS 00 000' lS ODO'OEl 5Z 6ZS 05615 94 58£ D0 5ZS 00'0085 DO lZS D0 4lS 94 87E d0 NM01'NM0131001W 00 000'£$ 00 05ZS - - - OOl 58Z D0 000'8S 00 05ZS - - L9 915 OOl 56Z d0 NMOl'08f1831001W - - 000'090'! 8Z lS 8Z lS Z A11llOHMV 301/l83S ~180dW DO OOb$ 900'008'5 05 bS 0575 005 OOS'9 00 SZbS 000'005'5 96 Z lS 9795 005 ODO'L 30 ,1110 '3111/1SNIlyVW ODODZ$ - OC9ZS 5£815 851 £Zb'E OOOOES 09'LZS O8'6lS lS bZb'£ d0 NMOl'NOIHbW _ 8b'~ - 495'[!!`4 51~91S 51915 zZ6 81 C8 00~055'lS OD~DSbS 8[1'!!6'9 DSOIS DS~OIS 460'1 OLE'8 30I~110 SdSSb'Nb'W 00585 - 000'000'! DO Zt$ - 951 99E'Z OO~D53 ODO'Q5L 0095 - L5l 896'Z d0 A110 ~~atTd SVSS'dNVW [10 5lS 00'000£$ 000'00! . - DO SZS 96 - - - - «. d800 83M3S'~ 831t/M NI?IVNb'6N U0 056' l$ 00 054$ 000'000'Et - 9D: Ll$ 564" l 009 6 t UO OZZ' l$ 00 09E$ 000 008 O1 - . Zb OI$ 6ZC l 000"EZ j0 A110 '9!1(18 HONAI - 00'00['!$ 000'OOZ'l 56'lE$ OE'lZ$ bbZ ZE9'l - 00'QOCI$ Ol9'99l't' EO~bI$ 5E~6$ SZZ OV8't d0 NMOl'AVafll - 00'005'Z$ 000'59 .. - 00'Zl$ - 5lE - 00'005'Z$ 000'£8 - 00'8$ Ol OOE 30 NMOl'3llIASll3A0l 00'05[$ - - - 00'SZ$ - - 00'05[$ 00'09Z$ 000'09! 00'Zl$ 00'Zl$ El 9E *AlIaOHlfl'd a31t1M A1Nf100 tlS.I[lOl 00'lOZ'4$ 00'OZ$ 000'059'4 64'81$ 64'81$ L59 L8L'lZ 00`[51'£$ OO~OZ$ 000'009'5 l5'4t$ 15'41$ LZ9 565'lZ NOllb'lINbS A1NflOD NOOfIOI - 00'005$ 000458 1091$ 10'91$ OOE 000'Z - 00'005$ 000'004''! lE'8$ 06'9$ -0OE 000'Z 30 A110'N019NIX3l OO~L50'b$ 00'05$ - 08'9t$ 08'9.!$ 009. 05E'S 00'S5L'Z$ 00'08!$ - Ol'b1$ _ Ol'bl$ 009 05E'S 30 NMOl'•9a(18S331 00'05Z$ 00~05Z$ OOQ'005 LE-Ll$ LE'Ll$ l9 9Z5'l OO;OOI$ 00'05Z$ 000'OZb Sb:LZ$ 54'61$ 9lZ 414'1 30 NMOl'NON'd931 . - OO~OOZ$ •000'05£ , 9Z-8$ - 6b'S$ OSl 5bL - 00'00£$ 000'054 ZE'Ol$ 98'9$ 9LC 05L j0 NMDl'3111~3~N3l~M'dl ~ ~' l,( AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH]3 ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-10 AMENDING ORDINANCE 62894-15 AMENDING AND REENACTING BECTION 18-168, ~~SCHEDIILE OF CHARGEB~~ OF CHAPTER 18, 'SEWERS AND SEWAGE DIBPOBAL~' AND AMENDING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES" OF CHAPTER 22, 'WATER" TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO OFF-SITE FACILITY FEES FOR MOTEL/HOTEL ESTABLIBHMENTB WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 628494-15 amending and reenacting Section 18-168, "Schedule of charges" of Chapter 18, "Sewers and sewage disposal" be amended as follows: (h) Schedule of connection fees. The total connection fee is the sum of the basic connection fee (which is based upon sewer service to one equivalent residential connection or "ERC") plus the off-site facilities fee (which is determined by ERC, type of service and effective date), as indicated in Tables I and II. The basic connection fee is $100.00 and includes Roanoke County personnel installing the physical tap to the sewer main after excavation by the customer. Table I 1 ~ ~ Off-site facilities fee Effective Effective 9/1/94 9/1/95 Motel and hotel (Per bed 500 500 2. That Section 22-82, "Rates and fees" of Chapter 22, "Water" be amended as follows: (b) Connection fees. (6) Schedule of connection fees. The total connection fee is the sum of the basic connection fee (which is determined by meter size) plus the off-site facilities fee which is determined by meter size, type of service, and effective date), as indicted in Tables I, II, and III. Table II OFF-SITE FACILITIES FEE Types of 7/1/91 7/1/92 7/1/93 7/1/94 7/1/95 Service Motel and Hotel (per be$ i~~'~I~:QO 1,105 1,160 1, 220 1, 280 1, 345 3. That the effective date of this ordinance is January 24, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix 2 ~r NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Circuit Court Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Ruth P. Bates, Clerk General District Court Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development :~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER Vl.~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend Section 22-82, Rates and Fees of Chapter 22, Water, and Section 18-168 Schedule of Charqes of Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, of the Roanoke County Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• When the current Roanoke County Water Standards were established in 1987, off-site facility fees for new businesses were normally based on the proposed meter size. An exception to this method was motel/hotel establishments. These establishments were assessed off-site facility fees based on the number of proposed beds with each bed representing 1/2 equivalent residential connection (ERC). Because of motel/hotel establishments traditionally having large peak flows in the morning and evening, it was felt that ERC's was a more appropriate method for fees than meter size. The first reading of the Ordinance was held on January 10, 1995. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: There has been much concern from motel/hotel owners that these fees are disproportionately high. Because of this concern, the Roanoke County Utility Department has performed a study on nine motels in Roanoke County. This study showed that the average water use in these facilities averaged 166 gal/room/day. Based on this information each guest room would be approximately equal 1/2 ERC as opposed to each bed equaling 1/2 ERC. Below is a chart showing the connection fees for a hypothetical 100 room motel with 2 beds per guest room. The 3-inch meter size was based on fixture values assuming each room had a bathroom with tub & shower, water closet and lavatory. It was assumed that laundry facilities, hose connection and water fountains were also provided . :~ ., C/l.~ OFF-SITE FACILITY FEE BASED ON METER SIZE PRESENT OFF- SITE FEE/BED OFF-SITE FEE/ROOM Water $58,982 $256,000 $128,000 Sewer 23,040 100,000 50,000 TOTAL $82,022 $356,000 $178,000 RECOMMENDATION' The study indicates that motel/hotel establishments do place large demands on the water/sewer system in the mornings and evenings; however, it appears to relate better to a per guest room basis instead of a per bed basis. Therefore, staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading to revise the water and sewer ordinances be revised to show that motel/hotel establishments be assessed off-site facility fees on a per guest room basis in lieu of a per bed basis. The fee per guest room would equal the amount presently charged per bed. FISCAL IMPACT' This change would require no expenditure of funds; however, there would be less revenue collected from these establishments when they are constructed. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gary Rober son, P.E. Utility Di ector Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: i~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~ ~> CJc: r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 62894-15 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168, "SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF CHAPTER 18, "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL" AND AMENDING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES" OF CHAPTER 22, "WATER" TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO OFF-SITE FACILITY FEES FOR MOTEL/HOTEL ESTABLISHMENTS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 628494-15 amending and reenacting Section 18-168, "Schedule of charges" of Chapter 18, "Sewers and sewage disposal" be amended as follows: (h) Schedule of connection fees. The total connection fee is the sum of the basic connection fee (which is based upon sewer service to one equivalent residential connection or "ERC") plus the off-site facilities fee (which is determined by ERC, type of service and effective date), as indicated in Tables I and II. The basic connection fee is $100.00 and includes Roanoke County personnel installing the physical tap to the sewer main after excavation by the customer. 1 ~` / i / Table I Off-site facilities fee Motel and hotel ..................................... (Per fed t~~) ......:............................... ..................................... Effective 9/1/94 500 Effective 9/1/95 500 2. That Section 22-82, "Rates and fees" of Chapter 22, "Water" be amended as follows: (b) Connection fees. (6) Schedule of connection fees. The total connection fee is the sum of the basic connection fee (which is determined by meter size) plus the off-site facilities fee which is determined by meter size, type of service, and effective date), as indicted in Tables I, II, and III. Table II OFF-SITE FACILITIES FEE Types of 7/1/91 7/1/92 7/1/93 7/1/94 7/1/95 Service Motel and Hotel (per bed ..................................... c~u~~t r~ciom) 1, 105 1, 160 1, 220 1, 280 1, 345 3. That the effective date of this ordinance is January 24, 1995. code~sewer.wat 2 .. ~,..,, AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-11 AIITHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN E%ISTING 15-FOOT BANITARY BEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A RELOCATED PORTION OF THE SAME EASEMENT ACR088 LOT 9, BLOCK 6, PLAT OF ONE OAR ROAD WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Plat of One Oak Road", dated 19 April 1978, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123, Boone Builders, Inc., dedicated to public use a sanitary sewer easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, across certain lots in the subdivision, including Lot 9, Block 6; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 9, Block 6, One Oak Road; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the existing 15' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate a portion of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional area for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have paid $2500.00 to reimburse the County for the costs of relocation of the line and easement in order to meet the requirements of the Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading and public hearing was held on January 24, 1995; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (easement) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interest in real estate renders it unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, conditioned upon the exchange as hereinafter provided, a portion of the 15' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, husband and wife, shown and designated as "S.S.E. TO BE ABANDONED" and cross-hatched upon the 'Plat Showing New Sanitary Sewer Easement Being Dedicated for Public Use to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, by Gary M. & Holly L. Greenlee and Part of Existing Sanitary Sewer Easement to be Vacated, Creating Hereon a New Sanitary Sewer Easement Situated Within Lot 9, One Oak Road (P.B. 9, Page 128)' dated 8 November 1994, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of an additional area of property for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement, being shown and designated as "NEW SAN. SEW. ESMT." and cross-hatched upon the above-described plat, together with the existing sanitary sewer easement but excluding that portion hereby vacated, to create a new 2 sanitary sewer easement of variable width, be, and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 5. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, sewer line relocation costs, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, or their successors or assigns; and, 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the Ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 .r ~ I E,Klb(, IRON prN i~ 1 `_ I \ \; ~~ ~o N ~. Z ~ 54 ~~ wl ~~ ~ ~ ~~ . a. ~-' ~./ w 15 2 I N ~ M C. ~ I N ?c v, ~ e ~ a a ~m i Q ~ ~ '~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ o~ o ~I ~ r ~I e ~ lo.d'I ~I ~I I al a ~, ~ ~ - I -_ __ 2 _ __ I I ~ (--239.87) ~ (------- ~ \ ~ ~ 76° 3!'40"W -- 105, 03' ?_ r ~~~_~~~ i5' PugG1G TIZ-f FA~EMENr ~. CG: '~ Fxrsr. r. P. _ ~ ~SE,TOgE FX/5T 5 ~~@s9iy oEK'SAN. $~ 0 3 =~- 16.0, 4A9~1'oONE~AN/TAgy ~ ~~FASEE~~ pMt ~ ~~ \ \ :~~tv' MENr ~ m -. ~ ~ ~A M 2 EiGK '~`- ~Wo09~7Jv10 (uN9TRNEAfH~ x~ _~-/ uN_c o - 35.1' '~?-G~',~ ~ ~ ~ ~ it _ O'®' 586'06'03"{M1', u, ~`"~ a' ~ Q ~ r°7.00' ~ CNAlN-GrNlC fENG I = ~ ~ ID 46.97• ° `~r 9 Z- hroRY `° ®'~'N89'04'Ol"E, 80.46' I ~ _ +u; 7.0' FRAME nrYL. `° ''`o " U ` jNG-LINE-r m ~0 ~ N b r: B. D' ` 17.3' ~ _; ~ ~ 71.9' ~ ~~ ~~ 1 -. I c~.ti o ~ +i '~ ~ ,o ~ + ~ ~~ a `1 m \ / ~ ~ , ~~ p ~ . I `~ ~~ i - ~ ~ ~\ 15' PUPi ~ l G Uf l I fY EbM'r. \~~\ \~ p~~p~ - 9o,er l0 P.L o~~ ~uavE °r,' -- 1~.iz ~DAn , h, W' G60WgAGE DRIVE ~N~, ~ 50 ~~~~ - NOTES: 1) AREA BOUNDED BY CORNER NO'S 1,2,3, 3A, 5B TO 1 IS TO BE GRANTED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. 2) AREA BOUNDED BY CORNER NO'S 4, 4A, 5 TO 4 IS PORTION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATEll. T$ ~ E,rrsr. r.p GuavE "a'~ d 64°23'f8" r 31, 48' a so, oo' A 56.19' GN. 53.78' . GURVE''g" D 48°!!' 74" T !l. /8' R ?5 00' A 71.03+ GH. 70.4!' GN.9. N 37°41' 03"E CURVE "C" A 7°38'23" r r3.o!' R r95.o0' A 76. DO' GN. ?5.98' GN.b. N6ti°35'57"E PLAT SHOWING s!~4288 ~ NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT VINCENT K 04 BEING DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE TO THE +~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA BY GARY M. & HOLLY L, GREENLEE PART OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATED CREATING HEREON A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SITUATED WITHIN, LOT 9, ...ONE OAK ROAD (P.B. 9, PAGE 12II) ' CAVL' SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY; VIRGINIA SC.,LE: I" = 7.0' DATE: 8 NOVEMBER, 1994 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, YiRGINIA ~~ o~ cony,. ° 90 - 36l (N,E) ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~.L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance for Authorization to Vacate a Portion of an Existing 15-Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement and to Accept a Relocated Portion of Same Easement. The Sewer Easement in Question is Located across Lot 9, Block 6, Plat of One Oak Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~~ B ~ ~~J ,,,rte,-rf ~~ -vvv "' CCC BACKGROUND' The record map for "Plat of One Oak Road," dated April 19, 1978 has been recorded in Plat Book 9, page 123, Boone Builders, Inc., dedicated to public use a sanitary sewer easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, across certain lots in the subdivision, including Lot 9, Block 6. Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, husband and wife, are owners of Lot 9, Block 6, One Oak Road and a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the existing 15' sanitary sewer easement. Mr. and Mrs. Greenlee have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate a portion of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional area for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement. The first reading of the Ordinance was held on January 10, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT' As a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, sewer line relocation costs, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, or their successors or assigns. The sum of $2,500.00 has been deposited with the Utility Department to cover the costs of modifying the easement in order to meet the requirements of the Utility Department. ~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading authorizing vacation of a portion of this easement and acceptance of a relocated portion of the same easement. Staff feels that the sewer line can still be properly maintained with this revised easement. SUBMITTED BY: Gary R e tson, P.E. Utilit irector APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 15-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A RELOCATED PORTION OF THE SAME EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 9, BLOCK 6, PLAT OF ONE OAK ROAD WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Plat of One Oak Road", dated 19 April 1978, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123, Boone Builders, Inc., dedicated to public use a sanitary sewer easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, across certain lots in the subdivision, including Lot 9, Block 6; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 9, Block 6, One Oak Road; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the existing 15' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate a portion of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional area for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have paid $2500.00 to reimburse the County for the costs of relocation of the line and easement in order to meet the requirements of the Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and a second reading and public hearing was held on January 24, 1995; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (easement) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interest in real estate renders it unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, conditioned upon the exchange as hereinafter provided, a portion of the 15' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, husband and wife, shown and designated as "S.S.E. TO BE ABANDONED" and cross-hatched upon the 'Plat Showing New Sanitary Sewer Easement Being Dedicated for Public Use to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, by Gary M. & Holly L. Greenlee and Part of Existing Sanitary Sewer Easement to be Vacated, Creating Hereon a New Sanitary Sewer Easement Situated Within Lot 9, One Oak Road (P.B, 9, Page 128)' dated 8 November 1994, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of an additional area of property for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement, being shown and designated as "NEW SAN. SEW. ESMT." and cross-hatched upon the above-described plat, together with the existing sanitary sewer easement but excluding that portion hereby vacated, to create a new • ~ t ~~ sanitary sewer easement of variable width, be, and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 5. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, sewer line relocation costs, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee, or their successors or assigns; and, 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. ---- I ~- -- 2 I -~ exist, raoN prN~ ~ (/-2~ X19.87) - ------ \~~ \ - 76° 3/'40"W ;-- 105, 03' L----- ', I.P. - z 154 \ =_~~~~ 15° PI1gG/G UjITIC EA~EMENr ?" ~~ s` 38. o `~ f TO E.1'1 ~ ~ @ 5y NE°Y SAN ~~ ~I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ 4 ~ 9E 4A9KOp E~ ANA R y ~~ ~°06~p3 E~~ ~,y~r \ ;\ ..r ~ 16.0 ~ E95EMEN ~ ~ I 1. D' T ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 I r)E~Gk n f {y009~J ,PArIO,(UN~JEKNFACH~ ,,~ c I N k l 0 35.I' ~-~=v r o ~ c m ~ m ~-®` 5B6°06'o3"sry, J 1~ I I R I f I e v700' ~ CHAIN-GINIC FEND ~ ~ ~ lU ®-~' N77°r3'71"E, u ~ LOr 9 Q ~O~m 2I ~ Z- hCORY 46.97'- ~ ®•~.N89°04'01"E, 80.44' ~lJ ~ `tom u~ I ~ 7.0' F A ~ "'~ " ~ gjNG-LINE-r u, ~~ ~ .c. ~ ME OWL, m c; UI~ o ~ ~ ~ r 3350 ~ ~,IN • ~ I ~ ~I ~ ~ I «m X10 `~ I?.3' S = ,~ '~ i ro,a J ~I ~I I ~- ~ I `r' 8.0 ~ 71.9' \ / ~ / i o''~ ~ ~~ I oD ~ o ~ my o i ~ ' ~' ,o ~ ~ I /$cy 4~av~„P„ ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~ m \ ` \~ ~ A~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ -~ ,, m ~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ --- ~ ~\ 4J~~ f5' pUD161G Ililb ICY E5M'r. ~~~ - N 6~ 46 ~o,e7'ror°r,oF~ cutavE°c' ~' 17~i~' p,pA~, h, W, G6owgAcE UarvE a N ~ Q 50 RIW~ - NOTES: 1) AREA BOUNDED BY CORNER NO'S 1,2,3, 3A,SB TO 1 IS TO BE GRANTED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT. 2) AREA BOUNDED BY CORNER NO'S 4, 4A, 5 TO 4 IS PORTION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATEll. F,ALTN VINCENT K cn ~ m i`' I o m '~ 3a_ N C ~/ .~ ;' I ~ it ~ I ' ~ ~ to Z ~~ ~~ L~~ ,- E,rrS>•. I.P. GuavE 'A'I ` e 64 ° 23'rB" r 31.48' R 50, 00' A 56,19' GN. 53.28' GUaVE''g„ D 48°rr'74" 7 11.18' R 75 00' A 71.03' GN. 70.41' GN.g. N 37°41' 03"E GuuVE "C" Q 7 ° 38' 23" Y r3.o1' A r95,o0' A Za.00' GN. 75, 98' Gk, A. N65°35'57"E PLAT SHOWING ~ti'~a2se ~ NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ~t9 04 BEING DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE TO THE `~'D$UAV~ COUNTY. OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA BY GARY M. & HOLLY L, GREENLEE PART OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATED CREATING HEREON A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SITUATED WITHIN,. LOT 9,...ONE OAK ROAD (P.B. 9, PAGE 12$) ' CAVE' SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY; VIRGINIP. SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE: $ NOVEMBER, 1994 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. (,C.- v~, t~ f ~~ "" " AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-12 VACATING AND CLOSING AN IINIMPROVED SECTION OF OLD ROAD LYING BETWEEN PROPERTIES OWNED BY STRANNA ARTHIIR, ET ALS, (TAB MAP NO. 77.15-1-12) AND THE COIINTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANORE COIINTY (TA% MAP NO. 77.15- 1-11), AND E%TENDING IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION THROIIGH PROPERTY OF HONEYWOOD ASSOCIATEB (TAB MAP NO. 77.15-1-10) TO THE E%ISTING OGDEN ROAD. WHEREAS, an old road as shown on a plat dated May 21, 1930, made by G. L. Poage, Surveyor, runs generally along the southwestern and northwestern boundary lines of a parcel of land formerly owned by the County School Board of Roanoke County, commonly known as the Ogden Center property and designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11, and extends to Ogden Road in a northeasterly direction through the property of Honeywood Associates, designated on the land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10; and, WHEREAS, in the early 1930's, the road was relocated generally to its present location and known as Ogden Road; and, WHEREAS, the section of the "Old Road" along the northwestern boundary of the Ogden Center property and the southeastern boundary of a parcel of land owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12), and extending to Ogden Road through the Honeywood Associates property, is not used or required for access to the surrounding properties; and, WHEREAS, this section of the "Old Road" is not used by the public, is not necessary for public use, is not improved, is not maintained by the County, and is not a part of the secondary road system of VDOT; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to vacate and close said section of the "Old Road"; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the public hearing and the second reading of this ordinance was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the unimproved section of the "Old Road", shown on a plat dated May 21, 1930, made by G. L. Poage, Surveyor, lying between and upon properties owned by Stranna L. Arthur, et als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11), and extending in a northeasterly direction through property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10) to the existing Ogden Road, as shown and cross-hatched on the attached copy marked Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance, together with a copy of the attached plat, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke 2 County, Virginia; and all costs and expenses associated herewith shall be paid from the capital projects fund; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning 3 ' . ~ ~" , ' EXHIBIT A' ! 0~ 0 '` ~ ~ ~% ~ - ~-3 ,~ ~ ~ - P ` ~ P _^ . ~, \'~~ ' - C' ;~ ' ~. ~ ~•~ ~ A .. .. v ' ~ _ I ~,c/ K %fU FAvr-GAR ~' ~ ' • ` ~ ,• • .. ~ ,, •~,r~• ~ Y ' ~ •~ ~ ~ • . \ ~ `( /n • ' O -~ ,, C~ ~ Q T, c= p/.4 ~ /~/Y~rL a i= % h ~ ~ ~ Qt/Y .SC°t1 voL ~ o '-fit • `,\, ~ ~- ,~~ vS,c- li'a~t•D~ ,~S ~Fiivc, Fii3.A,c~'y ~ '..'. Q~ _ ~ _ ~ . =,~ ~ . /.~.F~~,~ YAL o~ ~ ~ ~ ~, , k I r v sr,~ ~a,~ ~ - ,. ,. _ ~ y /~~C' /i~4' A ~d /cook` !~/~~iT' ~'~' ~„~sr~._ -~~. _ ~~ /6 1 G 0~:7-/~5,~ f~o~4n~a/G~. -- /3,Fi~/1-/vla v/Y%Ni~s/ iPo~9 ~ ~ ~ < 0 . ~ ~.a. J,t '1 -~ ~ ., ~~.-~ . . _ ,' ~ . ,~ • \~ Ro~,P . rA ~,- __ ,.. ~ c c . ~~ ;2. V ti ',o~ a v e s~ V ~ c o_ ~~°~ ' ~ _ F , _ , t O G1 Nv ~w • '~ ~ f I1 .V V ~j~f. pp '\~, rC ~ C C '~~ u ~~ T o• ~ ~ ~ ~ `A° s /I!t 60it p ~ ~' ~ v a '~ ~~N.~ ~ ~ y i ~ 'gY M ~ u . ~ a ~i, O , A h ~~ j0 (` N ~ ~p O~ ~ ~ o °°•,,~ .. r r~~~ 'VOA` d~ c~ ` ~` `\ !/~ r~ O i ~~/` /fir '1• 4 l`~-~ d, \ r ~~• ~~. \ ,j~C c `j, ' < ~- ~ . ° ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~•r•/ d~+J s r '',` ``f`/ ,~'i'/ v t` /~. / 'rr•~ ,./~ r ~ _ \ ~~-_ _ / . \ g~~ o'er i. 1 1 ~ i I /, / / 'Y / ~ ,~ _ ~i-~ o c; ~ z ~ :. gyn. ~~-T :6 d ~j ~ti :~ • 2~~ :._ y~X ~` o~ ~~~ f~ T i. ?'1 .. ~°'° ~J ~~ v i •~. ~~ . C:~ "/. '/.i ~ i i Q ' ~ Z ~~ c9 d ~ _ > z $ ' 0 ~ } a F- c~ '~ ~ ~$ -~ O o • . W L.1 w . O W } Y -- ~ Z a 4 o O d ~ ~0 N x o _ ~ ~ r Q ^ O r s 0 s u ii=~, e ~ ~ G=~G 0 ~ w o < ~ r i ~[ ~ Y V I ~ O < Y 1 J r 0 ~ 7 i r ~~a~< j < O p i 7 r Dt j yry a r O V O ~ O Y ~-O; . r~ ~o = i O = ~' i i = Y i Y O ~ = Y ~ J j J J ~ uiJ~ a i w r s ~ ~ J J L ~ I;I~I ~Ilil r J r F = w J G ~ J J ~ r ' i ~ J = J r J ~- _ ~ > ~ O ~~a~~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ i j ~, W .. FO O J J ~ ' ~ O j s O r r < t J i ~ Il ~ ~-~ ACTION ~ ITEM NUMBER ~` /' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED SECTION OF OLD ROAD LYING BETWEEN PROPERTIES OWNED BY STRANNA ARTHUR, ET ALS, (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-12) AND THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-11), AND EXTENDING IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH PROPERTY OF HONEYWOOD ASSOCIATES (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-10) TO THE EXISTING OGDEN ROAD. n COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ~ 8 COMMENTS : ~' _ /!',r.a,.~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to vacate and close an unimproved section of old road shown on a plat dated May 21, 1930, made by G. L. Poage, Surveyor. A copy of said plat is attached hereto as Exhibit A and the subject portion of road to be vacated is cross-hatched for identification purposes. BACKGROUND: Records reflect that the section of road shown on Exhibit A was part of the main road leading from Roanoke Starkey Road (now Route 419) to Poor House Road (now Colonial Avenue) prior to 1930. Because of the time period during which the "Old Road" existed, it appears that there was never a dedication or conveyance of the road to the County or the public and that it was created solely by virtue of public use. It has been shown as the existing "Old Road" on various maps and plats through the years. In the early 1930's, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County acquired several properties for relocation of this road to a thirty-foot (30') right-of-way, known as Ogden School House Road, which is also shown on Exhibit A. The relocated (alternative) public road later became a part of the secondary road system of the ~r Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and is now in the street system for the City of Roanoke. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The "Old Road", as shown on Exhibit A, runs generally along the southwestern and northwestern boundary lines of a parcel of land formerly owned by the County School Board of Roanoke County, now commonly known as the Ogden Center property and designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11, and extends to Ogden Road in a northeasterly direction through the property of Honeywood Associates, designated on the land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10. The "Old Road" is not shown on the County land maps; however, a partial copy of Tax Map No. 77.15 is attached hereto as Exhibit B for reference. A portion of the "old road" along the southwestern boundary of the Ogden Center property is used for access to the surrounding properties and to Leslie Lane. A portion of the Ogden School property is also used for access. No action is being requested at this time with regard to this section of the "Old Road", as no alternative means of access is available. The portion of the "Old Road" along the northwestern boundary of the Ogden Center property and the southeastern boundary of a parcel of land owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12), and extending to Ogden Road through the Honeywood Associates property, is not used or required for access to the surrounding properties. This section of the "Old Road" is not used by the public and is not necessary for public use. The "Old Road" is not improved, is not maintained by the County, and is not a part of the secondary road system of VDOT. FISCAL IMPACTS• None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate and close, to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, the unimproved section of the "Old Road" lying between and upon properties owned by Stranna L. Arthur, et als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11), and extending in a northeasterly direction through property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10) to the existing Ogden Road. 2 l•~ 3 Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. Hu an Assistant Coun y Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens 3 y' - ~ , . ~~~ ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT A' ! a ~ ~ ~• ~3 Y ~ ~ ,` ~ ' ~ • ~ rJ ~ ~ .. . ,y a + . Q ~' y, ~Q`P . • ~, 3. ~._ • , .~ ~ • .. i • ~ .~ ~ ' . ~. . • .. • , -~y1 ~ Y • Q~ ,~ ~ r . ~ [ /V 1 O -~ . ,, ~1 „ Q _ ~q ~' Y 1 T ~ ~= Q/A C,' 2/Y~~'L d ~= / h ~' (J ~ ,CJ~ N sC° tl o oL ti `~\~ ~ ~ iv sr,~ '7: o „~ . _ . _~. ik,F~~ ~ SAL o ~- ~ . •, k - I per. - ji1Jr4 y /~~ o /K ~~ ~ ~.~-r / l7 L= /Qo c~'rt~a/(~ ' - u -i 0 !/i~ /moo o /~ cif /?/v( ~. ~ ~ . ~ id. ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ '~ ~ . f ~. / n-'~ yam' ~ - ~ ~ \„ • ~ ~~ , ~, o .. ~ ~ ,'2 ~z J a ;~ ~. ~~. a ° 3 ~$ ~ z ' 0 ~ ~ a H u z Q ~ JQ ~ Oo ~ W V w D W Y Y -- O ¢ Z 4 4 O O a ~ ~/ ~~ ~J1 ~~ ~` `0~ 110, ~C ~ ca v ~,o rrrr sorr / e O F C ash J O ////\j ~ ~~ o z '~ / ~` ~~} z r '_ ~~N.~ r _ r .iii `+ M a ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~ O . ~ ri ~~ ~ Op, b G f N ~f fp ~f ~•~ y0y C 1~ ,'~~fij pf pp 1 poy +~ ~ r~~` ~` r~ r~ r ~ r `` !. eQ r 0 C ~` ~i1. '~~ 7\ !`~>j A, \ r ~~ i ?` 'h ` ` `til d~ 7 a ~ ~ ~ . ~, . m ,, o ~ ~~ ~~. GI`I/ c ~ ~~ /' ` `` f ` ~~/ 1, /~ ~` J`r~ ~f 1/ i /' / rf ti h ~ V ~ ~ p U u . ~ Q .~ ~. f M ~ a ~~ u ;;i-i r~ ~ = L•- i f ~V /N ~ ~c d '`~ h h . ~~ ~ .•.. y7•X i ~G o~ ~~~ f~ T ~ Z ~, M '~ 10.E ~~~ \~ _ ~~ -i. !~'r , c `~ ~C. / 1_ _~~~ ~ `~ x o _ Q ~ V Q .t O ~' z K e 0 u i s w ~ ~A• L . ~ C O V O O ~ t = V .c o u i u i ~ o V A O ~ 7 = v y ~ a l i j t O O = ~ V O ~y~y"'~ V O M O V }-a, ~~ ,o ' ~ O = ~' Y Z = u r oo~ou u J o = o e J J J J • Y J J r u t u r e ~ ~ i ~ J J ~ ~ ~ l i l I Y ` ~ J ~ z W ~ ~ i U' J V y ~ W ti ~ J F J = J ` J Y _ / Y ~ O ~~o~i 1 ` 1 ~i j ~•' ;~ >o O J S J J ' a e j` O r ~.,«~a J, t e A u-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED SECTION OF OLD ROAD LYING BETWEEN PROPERTIES OWNED BY STRANNA ARTHUR, ET ALS, (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-12) AND THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-11), AND EXTENDING IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH PROPERTY OF HONEYWOOD ASSOCIATES (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-10) TO THE EXISTING OGDEN ROAD. WHEREAS, an old road as shown on a plat dated May 21, 1930, made by G. L. Poage, Surveyor, runs generally along the southwestern and northwestern boundary lines of a parcel of land formerly owned by the County School Board of Roanoke County, commonly known as the Ogden Center property and designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11, and extends to Ogden Road in a northeasterly direction through the property of Honeywood Associates, designated on the land records as Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10; and, WHEREAS, in the early 1930's, the road was relocated generally to its present location and known as Ogden Road; and, WHEREAS, the section of the "Old Road" along the northwestern boundary of the Ogden Center property and the southeastern boundary of a parcel of land owned by Stranna L. Arthur, Lyle M. Arthur, and Patricia A. Holt (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12), and extending to Ogden Road through the Honeywood Associates property, is not used or required for access to the surrounding properties; and, WHEREAS, this section of the "Old Road" is not used by the public, is not necessary for public use, is not improved, is not maintained by the County, and is not a part of the secondary road system of VDOT; and, ~`~ WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to vacate and close said section of the "Old Road"; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the public hearing and the second reading of this ordinance was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the unimproved section of the "Old Road", shown on a plat dated May 21, 1930, made by G. L. Poage, Surveyor, lying between and upon properties owned by Stranna L. Arthur, et als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11), and extending in a northeasterly direction through property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10) to the existing Ogden Road, as shown and cross-hatched on the attached copy marked Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated to the extent that any public or County interest may exist, pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance, together with a copy of the attached plat, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke 2 c 5 .. (~t-3 County, Virginia; and all costs and expenses associated herewith shall be paid from the capital projects fund; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3 ~.~. ..„,r ~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB OF ROANORB COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIEBDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-13 VACATING AND CLOSING A 0.220-ACRE STRIP OF IINIISED AND IINIMPROVED PIIBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BOIINDED ON THE EAST SIDE BY THE EBISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR OLDEN ROAD (ROIITE 681) AND BOIINDED ON THE WEST BIDE BY A PARCEL OF LAND KNOWN AS THE OLDEN CENTER PROPERTY (TAB MAP NO. 77.15-1-i1) AND TO AIITHORIZE SALE OF SAID PARCEL A8 PART OF THE OLDEN CENTER PROPERTY. WHEREAS, by deed dated February 15, 1932, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 211, page 239, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County acquired a strip or parcel of land thirty feet (30') in width for improvements to Ogden School House Road (now Ogden Road); and, WHEREAS, more recent improvements to Ogden Road have adjusted its location in an easterly direction, leaving a strip of unused right-of-way lying between the existing Ogden Road and the Ogden Center property, as shown upon the plat entitled "Boundary Survey for County of Roanoke" dated November 14, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners; and, WHEREAS, the subject strip of right-of-way is unused and unimproved, is not maintained by the County and is not a part of the secondary road system of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and is not required for public use; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to vacate and close said 0.220-acre parcel of land as public right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, 1 WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the public hearing and the second reading of this ordinance was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public road right-of-way on the 0.220-acre strip of land lying between the Ogden Center Property and Ogden Road, as shown on the plat entitled "Boundary Survey for County of Roanoke" dated November 14, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers- Surveyors-Planners, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith shall be paid from the capital projects fund; and, 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, that portion of the vacated right-of-way lying between Ogden Road and the Ogden Center property to be conveyed to PM Properties, Inc., having been made available and deemed unnecessary for other public uses, is hereby declared to be surplus. 4. That conveyance of said portion of the vacated right-of- way as part of the Ogden Center transaction (Reference Ordinance No. 121394-6) is hereby authorized. 2 r 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning 3 a ~ a ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ Ulric • ~ Z I W W r 5 ~ `` ~ "~ Z ti ~ • ° v 1 i rn ° ~ X656 '~S• F.%HIBIT A ~ mo I ~, ~ z~ ~ ~ / {} ~ ~~S Z 4 w I Z r ~i~ /\ n/ ~JeO n ~~ o x9 O O amp Z ~~ \~ V~v MIQW)•S~• = O >N~ Q /ti/~Q ~ ~_ 0 9 °oa ~ ~ 3"~i /O~rh~~~ ~~~~w 0 o m I ~~~ oNW ry~'\ ~~ W ~ 0~~~ ~ in ~~' / u ~ ~ / ~id of / ti a / ~/// \ ~ ~// PGP ~ // ~ \ ~ \ ~ 6; rl ~ • \ ~" N HW / / ,'~ ~ O'y / / t,, ~`~P// ~ Z ~~ t a Z /0' h h/ f. ~~,; ~ O J ~ ~ I ~ ~ N l+- / ,tylA 4j ~1 w w o 4j7' ip ~ ~ Or a c~Z °`' ~'/ ~' O / o 'd Z~ ~~ tio' ~ ~i U 3 a0o I N ~ w a ~' . 9i~~ / ~ ~ .h~O / Q d / / ~ ~h W • ci= 1 Q~~ _- ~ Q UN \3 Mme ~ ~~ ~o~ '- 3a 'nZ~ h0 °o J N~ m+ h / r'1~0~ Q ~ O`er ri ~• I M O Qi ,j O n i7~ / / ~rN < r ~o~`! rn~ 11 ~Q ~ ~ i~ NN 3 II q= ~zz < ,n ~~ 3 • zw~aa a ~ ~~ s "~/ / WKZW°> ON a0 ^' mOOUZW -3 OrOi0~0 M'r 00/ ~ 1 }~LL~mw _ a ~OZ M~ /O~ / ~ 11 ~OpN°~ ~ ~ m~ 11 ONd ~ O 1 =WNZOW n ~ II ~_ ~[1NN / ~jWO UZ~OOJ h ~JV NM 11 NYZ 3~U~01''a W~ N II Y = 0~ ~ZVZ ZJ WOW ~OOwW iN ~O KOQ ~ ~Q ~ZOC'~o z \ ~ ti Z~Z~ I amZ~p} N ~ Om~ I ~ Or OD Dm~urcd ~ ~ ~ Up la-O`liWNw NW~o~~1 s ~ ~ \ O°` mQO ! o~N~m~ww O~N®Z'~ _ ~ 'ti OQN rW~pvl> ° :ti w 5 I ~m-WU OI ( Oh Z OW 1 mQK~ <W s n ~ °0~7 1 wiFooFm N I - W ~ ~ 4i a ° . a ~ .N N O N :_ ~ y 4bp21llbL 3 ~ mrtL I N}alnZro C)~O I• arnoo NmUQ~Z wW' Ida WW N~4F- r QUI m` IDS o~mo a~`^~`~Ino 1~< o ~ vi~ O ~ N Z - - 1 ,~ ;/ ~ / v + ~ ~`' a P . . ~ . ,~ ~ ~ ~ /j/jr 14 d FA NFL ~~i •{\\ V / .. ~ • •: ) A . .. [` v , I ` ~ . . ~,~J N K U ~AYr-G~'R ~,.. .. ~~ y • . ~ ., Q .Q . r ~. ~ ~ c /• '~ ~ h~- p/AG2/y/K a/= /ht_ ~GDk/Y S~°tioaL ~: v ~ .'~ `,\, ~ ~ f-(U [/~S .C` ~D,/1•l3 ~ S /.~E//Y4 F/!y AL ~~'J ~ ~.... Q~ Ky a~Oo //i,~4' ~ ~ d /COo~` /ZA~/~ r o'ff' ~~, l Drj'- - ~y i ~ Ti''}/Q/( Lc y /~a ~ ^~J /o • sri~/ ~'/ U /~/ j~ •'~ 7~ .. ,• (= L~ p~:7-/~5,c- f~o;4n'o/C~ ~ /3.Fi~/y! o v/Y%M it/ ~~-9 ~ ~ , < 0 ~~~ po o ~ ~~-~irt ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ %~~ ~ ~ . _ . ,, ~ ,,~ ~ ~~ Zo c ,. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 24, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING A 0.220-ACRE STRIP OF UNUSED AND UNIMPROVED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BOUNDED ON THE EAST SIDE BY THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR OGDEN ROAD (ROUTE 681) AND BOUNDED ON THE WEST SIDE BY A PARCEL OF LAND KNOWN AS THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-11) AND TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF SAID PARCEL AS PART OF THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ :~ ~~ ~,~~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to vacate and close an unused and unimproved public right-of-way, consisting of 0.220 acre, more or less, lying between the existing Ogden Road and the parcel of land known as the Ogden Center property, said right-of-way being shown on a plat entitled "Boundary Survey for County of Roanoke" dated November 14, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners. A partial copy of said plat is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and a complete copy is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: By deed dated February 15, 1932, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 211, page 239, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County acquired a strip or parcel of land thirty feet (30') in width, being fifteen feet (15' ) on either side of the center line as shown on a survey made by Geo. L. Poage, Surveyor, dated May 21, 1930, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, for construction, alterations and improvements to Ogden School House Road (now Ogden Road). In the mid-1980's, certain improvements were made to Ogden Road which again relocated the public right-of-way in an easterly u-~ direction, leaving a strip of unused right-of-way between the Ogden Center property and the present Ogden Road. Ogden Road is part of the street system of the City of Roanoke. The City of Roanoke/County of Roanoke boundary line runs along the western line of Ogden Road. The subject strip of unused right-of-way lies in the County of Roanoke. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION On December 13, 1994, the Board of Supervisors authorized sale of the Ogden Center property to PM Properties, Inc. A current survey of the property revealed the strip of unused right-of-way between it and Ogden Road, as shown on Exhibit A. The contract purchaser has requested that the 0.220-acre strip of unused and unimproved right-of-way be vacated and that the portion along the front of the Ogden Center property be included in the deed to provide public road frontage on Ogden Road. Ogden Road, in its present location, serves all of the same property owners as it did prior to the relocation which resulted in the unused strip of right-of-way. The subject 0.220-acre strip of land is unimproved and is not maintained as public right-of-way by the County or by the Virginia Department of Transportation. This strip is not required for public right-of-way or for other public use. FISCAL IMPACTS• None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate and close the 0.220-acre strip of unused and unimproved public right-of-way bounded on the east side by the existing right- of-way for Ogden Road (Route 681) and bounded on the west side by a parcel of land known as the Ogden Center Property (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) and to authorize sale of said parcel as part of the Ogden Center property. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huffm Assistant County Attorney ~- `~ Approved ( ) Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs J nom. C7 `m 9 Z r VI~~ Q .~ x° ~ ~ V "'~ ~ - lJ ~ _ ¢ o 5 ~ ~ • ° W I laJ ~ ~ o ~ ,6~y`L ~ '~a• EXHIBIT A ~ o z I o ~ 'r' a ~ ~6 ~ ~ 0 ~ 9~e .~ z z a ° N I d Q X m ~ J ~~/ l 3. / 3 IQ ,gs. S -~ ~' 0 0 c4j° Zr ~~ ~~ ~/VW a~IQO~'s~9O O boo ~ ~ ~'s6 lo`~Th^~\ I~Ih^ o° N _~ ~/ 2~~ of ~ fzlo~ / ° o m 1 ~y' 6c~ pNW i ~ ~ ~ `J I p~YIT / a O / ~ \\, i ~ QG / ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \ %• ~ry M i o MHO ~~~ ~! N i • 'S I1LN3 HW , ~ ~'h /p w z ~ a. ~ ~•. I X o o ~ .r ,~ -' ~ i ~- ~ 6. 'I' / a I i i \ ~ ~ o I •~ ~6' ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~~ W. - Z~ ~~~ Mme ~ ~~ ~o~ .~ ;~ om o 00 Zr h a N m ~ 'o '^ ;~ ri1` o~ o=~ .J Or ~ ~N ~ ~ II O ~ N N 3 11 11 = eT i t` ~~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ U v ''' `'~ / ~ 17 ~ ~/ a d d ~ ~ O N W ^'~~ ` p /O / 1 O Z 3 ~ W~ 11 ON~M ~ OU I 2 ~~ II 11 = ~!1 N ~ / ~ j W 0 M ~JU NM 11 NY°Z W~ N II 11 = ^, l QU ,~'~~ ~~ ~wu ~ j ~o~' ~ZOO~ZO Z \ \ ~~ Z~Z°~'' ~D'm~`-'tea ~ ~'~ ~'~~ 1 r 1 Nw~o~t~ ; \ ~ Op m¢O OWN®Z~ o ~ :5ry °45 N m~N 1 ~ 1 U ~_ O 1' P a0~0~ 3 ooj~ a o / NrOa I o~m° w ~ W 1 a° a j ~O / o ;~ cv t'" ,N O ~ ~ Obp~lba 3 O ~ ~1y1 A QG .~, 0 x t) `~ ~'OJ4I~ a ~ Q ~ N } ¢YO Z W ~ Q 4 W ~ Z W O > ¢IOOUZW Y~ N 6 p W aa~..~m° J W ~ ° ~ J U ~ O 4 OG~~~6 ~mZ~om ~r~ ° oo~W~o zn,N~aG. w- m~ W O W Cf~Q~~ Qm ~ au~z~- U~mUa~Z W Qom IW JO~e OZ cw%iNO~ 1~4 ~O ~• N z /Q~ , .~ 1 i -\7 0 j1Yy v p ~ ' ,y ~ + ~ n ; • ~ ~; ~• . i~ ~ i~. • /•:~ A .. ~ • ~ ~ ~ K HU FAvr-GAR ~~~~ . • ` y; . .. • .. ~ ., . Q ~. r • ~'/' C' ~ •' ,~ ~o ~ ~ o / '` /, ~ J T1. ~%, ~= Q/AG !~/Y/K a r= % h ~= C.~ G ,C~~n~ .S'C°h UOL ~ ~ Q ~ !T~ w ` " Q~ `~\~ ~ ~ ,~ a vas ~ ~0.~-17~ ,~,~ S ~~i~v~, Fi~y A.c ~~y •. • c~ .. ~` ~ ,. Ry D,'- , ~rQ /~/Y o /K ~~ ~ !~ / l~ [= Ro ~c7t~G/C ~ ' - i ~ y ~ ~--,~,~~~ E y ,~a ,~ ~,, io ~ sl,~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~, -~~ ~ f ~ ;- ~ ~- p~:7- /~fi ~ ~(o i4 n'o/Gc. -- ~ ~~~/~'! o v/YiNi y ~0~9 ~ o ~ < !~i ~.+ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ %~ pov/r ~ ~~ ~ :~ ~ ` I~- .~ _ . ~ ,. ,,~ . . ,G oo ~~ 2 ~_ u-w AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING A 0.220-ACRE STRIP OF UNUSED AND UNIMPROVED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BOUNDED ON THE EAST SIDE BY THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR OGDEN ROAD (ROUTE 681) AND BOUNDED ON THE WEST SIDE BY A PARCEL OF LAND KNOWN AS THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-11) AND TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF SAID PARCEL AS PART OF THE OGDEN CENTER PROPERTY. WHEREAS, by deed dated February 15, 1932, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 211, page 239, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County acquired a strip or parcel of land thirty feet (30') in width for improvements to Ogden School House Road (now Ogden Road); and, WHEREAS, more recent improvements to Ogden Road have adjusted its location in an easterly direction, leaving a strip of unused right-of-way lying between the existing Ogden Road and the Ogden Center property, as shown upon the plat entitled "Boundary Survey for County of Roanoke" dated November 14, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers-Surveyors-Planners; and, WHEREAS, the subject strip of right-of-way is unused and unimproved, is not maintained by the County and is not a part of the secondary road system of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and is not required for public use; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to vacate and close said 0.220-acre parcel of land as public right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, ~- a-~+ WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 10, 1995; and the public hearing and the second reading of this ordinance was held on January 24, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public road right-of-way on the 0.220-acre strip of land lying between the Ogden Center Property and Ogden Road, as shown on the plat entitled "Boundary Survey for County of Roanoke" dated November 14, 1994, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers- Surveyors-Planners, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith shall be paid from the capital projects fund; and, 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, that portion of the vacated right-of-way lying between Ogden Road and the Ogden Center property to be conveyed to PM Properties, Inc., having been made available and deemed unnecessary for other public uses, is hereby declared to be surplus. 4. That conveyance of said portion of the vacated right-of- way as part of the Ogden Center transaction (Reference Ordinance No. 121394-6) is hereby authorized. u-4 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ..~;, AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-14 6R14~~NG {t',!~`f A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO RONALD DAVIS Al~~~~~,l~l'~1tN DAVIB TO CONSTRIICT A PRIVATE KENNEL LOCATED AT 1942 LAIIREL WOODS DRIVE, (TAB PARCEL 36.01-2-51) CATAWBA MAGIBTERIAL DIBTRICT WHEREAS, Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis have filed a petition to allow the construction of a private kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 13, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on January 24, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Eddy to deny the Special Use Permit, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~ ~ 7`~-- Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney V~-"` PETITIONER: RONALD & CAVERN DAMS CASE NUMBER: 1-1/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 24, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Ronald & Lavern Davis for a Special Use Permit to construct a private kennel, located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Ed Natt, attorney, stated that he is representing several of the neighbors who are opposed to the request because of the noise. He presented photos showing the location of the existing kennel. Mr. Natt said that his client, Mr. Spadaro, has had to call several times during the middle of the night to complain about the barking dogs and the Davises were not even aware the dogs were barking. Doug Spadaro stated that at a minimum, the dogs have awakened them twice aweek--the last episode was Saturday at 2 a.m. He said the barking goes on for two to four minutes and it is very difficult to get back to sleep. The silencer tends to make it a staccato; a short bark and a beep, a short bark and a beep. The beep is as annoying as the bark. The Commission asked if the dogs bark during the day and Mrs. Spadaro said that periodically they do. David Keith commented that he lives across the street from the Davises and the dogs bark during the day. The Commission asked if the silencer makes a difference. Mr. Keith said that he did not notice a difference early Saturday morning C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the kennel silencer and number of dogs. Mr. Davis said that he has owned two dogs for nine years, the other three (which include a puppy) were acquired about a year ago. The kennel silencer was installed in mid-November and is operated by battery which emits a high pitch tone for about 5 seconds; received complaint about barking dogs from one neighbor and have asked him to let me know when the dogs disturb him; the animals are classified as hunting working dogs; plans to move to Botetourt County in about a year and a half. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The private kennel shall be for a maximum of five dogs. 2) The property owner shall install and continually operate asound-type kennel silencer. The silencer shall be installed prior to/in conjunction with the property being used for a private kennel. 3) The existing pens located near the western property line shall not be used for any animals associated with the private kennel unless relocated to a location on the property that conforms to the use and design standards guidelines. CC-S 2 E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker stated that this is a temporary situation and under our zoning ordinance this is allowed with a Special Use Permit. She said that she hopes better neighborly relations can be worked out and moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended conditions. The motion failed to carry with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson NAYS: Ross, Thomason ABSENT: Witt F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Messrs. Ross and Thomason both expressed concern with noise and pointed out that Laurel Woods is an established residential neighborhood where a private kennel would be inappropriate. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ,~ , ..;_~ /J/~/~J// ,~ Terrance Harr' gton, retary Roanoke Co ty Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Part I Petition: Private Kennel Request Ronald and Lavern Davis Case Number: 1-1/95 A. EBECIITIDE SIIMMARY Prepared by: T. Harrington Date: December 27, 1994 This is a Special Use Permit (SUP) request of Ronald and Lavern Davis requesting permission to operate a private kennel on their property located at 1942 Laurel Mountain Drive. The property is currently used for single family purposes. The proposed private kennel would be for five dogs owned by the property owner. The proposal conforms to the use and design standards contained in the zoning ordinance. A possible impact of the proposed use may be noise associated with barking dogs. A kennel silencer is proposed to minimize noise impacts. B. DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a SUP to allow a private kennel on a 1.007 acre parcel located at 1942 Laurel Mountain Drive. The • property is zoned R-1. Private kennels are permitted in R-1 districts provided a SUP is issued by the Board of Supervisors. Five dogs, owned by the property owner are proposed for the kennel. A site inspection during the week of December 26th, indicated that two adult dogs and at least one puppy are currently on the property. No kennel silencer was visible during the inspection. The owner proposes to construct/relocate a kennel pen in the center rear portion of the 'lot. A "sound-type" kennel silencer is proposed to minimize any "barking" impacts from the kennel. C. APPLICABLE REGIILATIONS Private kennels are defined as the keeping, breeding. raising, showing or training of three or more dogs over six months of age for personal enjoyment. Private kennels are allowed in R-1 districts provided a SUP is issued by the Board of Supervisors Use and Design standards for private kennels require (1) a minimum lot size of one acre, (2) the kennel be accessory to a single family dwelling, and ( 3 ) any exterior run or pen designed to house four or more animals be located a minimum of 25 feet from any property line. • Part II A. ANALYSIS OF E%ISTING CONDITIONS --~ Location - The property is located at 1942 Laurel Mountain drive in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area (Catawba Magisterial District) TopographyfVegetation - The site of the proposed kennel is a wooded residential lot located near the upper end of Laurel Mountain Drive. Topographically, the site drops off from Laurel Mountain Drive, resulting in a proposed pen location that is lower in elevation than the house on the property and the closest adjacent residence on the adjoining lot. Surrounding Neighborhood - The surrounding area is characterized by large lot residential development. All of the lots are wooded. Access - Access to this site and all adjacent properties is from Laurel Mountain Drive. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED IISE 'Site Lavout - Applicants for private kennels are not required to construct externs-1 pens or runs. However, if such facilities are designed and constructed to house four or more animals, they must be located at least 25 feet from any property line. Currently, several small pens are located near the property line on the west side of the property. The applicant proposes to locate/relocate the proposed 10 x 20 foot pen site to the middle of the rear yard of the property. In this location it would be located approximately 30 feet from the closest property line and an estimated fifty yards from the closest adjacent residence. Although not required for private kennels, the applicant proposes to use a kennel silencer to minimize barking sounds. Possible Impacts - Given the proposed scale of the private kennel, the only possible impact would be a noise impact from barking. The applicants proposal to use a kennel silencer will assist in minimizing barking. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COIINTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is located in a Development designation. The plan does not contain specific policies or guidelines for the proposed land use. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COIINTY DEVELOPMENT BTANDARD3 A site development plan will not be required for this use. If the private kennel is approved by the Board of Supervisors, the applicant will need to obtain a zoning permit to locate the proposed pen in the location shown. Part III A. STAFF CONCLIISION3 The zoning ordinance provides for special use permits in recognition that certain uses may, depending upon their scale, design, location, and conditions imposed by the Board, be compatible with existing and future uses in the district. The ordinance also provides that to grant a special use permit, the Board must find that the proposed use will meet the minimum standards of the zoning ordinance and will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community. Items to be considered when evaluating adverse impact include traffic, noise, odor, dust, etc. The proposed use will meet the current zoning ordinance standards. With regards to possible adverse impacts, the staff believes that the only possible impact associated with the proposed private kennel is noise associated with barking. The installation and use of a sound-type kennel silencer can be an effective way to minimize barking. Several neighbors have contacted the staff indicating that barking from the existing animals on this property has been a periodic nuisance in the neighborhood. The staff has no way to objectively evaluate the historic degree or frequency of the .barking. Under the current situation, any party who is aggrieved by a nuisance can file a civil petition to have the nuisance abated. The issuance of the SUP, will be the County's assertion that the property owner has a right to have five dogs on the property. The SUP will not legally restrict any private civil proceedings to abate a nuisance created by barking. The staff recommends that the SUP should only be approved if the following conditions are attached: 1. The private kennel shall be for a maximum of five dogs. 2. The property owner shall install and continually operate a sound-type kennel silencer. The silencer shall be installed prior to/in conjunction with, the property being used for a private kennel. 3. The existing pens located near the western property line shall not be used for any animals associated with the private kennel unless relocated to a location on the property that conforms to the use and design standards guidelines. • ~J • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND 70NING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. BOX 29800 T-- _ Roanoke, VA 24018 ,~ _ (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date received./ lu,1i!~~~J received by: f .u~~ rcc~TT application ~ ~ ~ PC/BZA date: //~~~ placards iss ~ ~ ~ BOS date: ~/~/y;7 Case Number: / .., ~ q~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name~o~tA4-~ F ~~v`= ~" ~~J ~S ` / Phone:-.3~ =3~/~ Address: 19`~Z L,gJ-Z~-I~~,~~ ~~'"'~ ~t1w'~l+l V ~ Zip Code: 21;3 Owner's name: I....A~G N ~ i~ ~av's Phone: ~Sy -3cN1 ~/~ Zip Code: 2~ I ~3 Address: 19'-12 ~aJ~.~ ~-d, ~ ti. }~,tv~ I ~jA.t..~.'ri~ ~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: 3 (o , D j •- 2 '- ~ 1 \ _ ~1'}Z L4.=-~x-~.l.~ec;~1.~ 1~!t--J~-- Magisterial District: C q ~ gv~j(3,4 " Z, 1.-pN(i~.~n-tia~ L.cr 1°I ~~x-..c-rte~..! ,-~~~e~ eAV~ YA Community Planning Area:~~/Lc~ CfLG~1C_- Size of parcel (s): . Cr.' acres Existing Zoning: (~ ` ~ Existing Land Use: `l~+cs ~ p~-~T1 !'r-`.. sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: For StaN Use On/y Proposed land Use: ~~l~TE. ~~ ~- use Type: Does th-eparcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES v NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO •Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: I~`5 Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws . v rus v ws v Consultation / 8 1/2" x 11' concept plan Application fee ~u f~` . . ;/ Application ,,~,~c~--• '.:.« Metes and bounds description / ~.<« Proffers, if applicable Justification ~ ` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners ~ti"- l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and ~' i`i''y am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: For Stall Us• On/y: Case Number • The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-31 as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. 1 Nc ~~~~~ S~ t=f~~„ 1~~i~~~1fL~ K-cNNct...- ~-AcL 1~5c~C,t~V.t ~ W'e~~ ~~- ec,~s~s~r=T r~.N~ t~R.1~o-•x~~S t,~ ~~- 'Tl-tc ~-ST~-JE~ ~2i2cv a~ ~-ZS ~nl t~ ~ L» c~,`tS ~ ST ~CL-~ ~W'tRs ~--~~ of v.1bo t~' j l ~ IZz 1 A W J ~+~-~~~o~c.A Il.~rl,sct_ c~xvu..t~ t3~, S•:zsi~.~~ ~' ~s --~ a ~~ 51i,~;~1~ 1 '-''rV~. -C~rE. ~-C~.;..~-t' {~a~-,'~-MrG {~~•t ~(1~2,.y ~~ L aG7JC.~ A Nil.. Lso c..,~-~~ 1 rl W ~^_ ~-, -~. c=--~ S..v Cz-S~ `> t-~1~ ti t~ C7~~ f ~ v GLas~`. -t't~,J S~ ~ P~P~~ -m o -r~ ~ ~c t ST ~ r~C-~ l't1-r\~~ • • Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County ,Comprehensive Plan. h? ~-ti+~-~r1~ tL~.~ 'Ctiac ~ CL+ M.kR~_~`> IZ'~`~c. O F i t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t l S 1rc~--~- ~ +~ tC~.~, ,•~:c~ ~~ ~~° =~ i -.~ C.1 ~ Z- S 1 C.~ t~ ~ 1'~ t~1~ ~t7 .''aTdZW-~c4.~ t- o rL. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~W d R.IC.. f ~.! C~ ~ W t ~ t~ tic ~ ~-=-~~`t-~ Q ~ L t= Ge r~ M~~ 0.t_ ~ ~ t ~ '1 i~ ~2~~0~~ .fLr~a~ ~ vv ~..~ 1~t~:..CT' Tl \c, ~ t sr~ ~ ~-Z U Sc A.ti~ ~~S t t~ ~ ~ : ~0.a]~l+~ ~S ~ C~ ~ ~ p~c..p,~_ ~ 1~.~ ti. t (\l~,U~ ~...~T s~ "zc p.r,1~ ~C--y-T~~ o Q,; ~-~.15 {tea 4.~- ~'t~P~'ti`• 2~ ~-czr~' -F~..o~. f~~y ~v,.s~R ~.~ . Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as{well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. -i'~-4c. rt.~ s ~ IL'cN ~:.~.. v~-Q V ~ ~M.~-..~ y ~ r, ~ u s c o ~" ~ ~`l _ ~~ -.1c::j . '~?_.;JPoscs~ I,r~,.~t~.~„ S1tov~ ~ 11`1~vS-C 1..1`~ H t `c. ~1tc. l-!(~~Z.~i~ ~~~ ®..~ i Ht. ~~1 S ~ I ,~ t~ ~ IZ-P.A V ~ l11 ~ ~ s ~ Sit 0' ~ Co ~t~t P~ n~ L~ W t`t-L-~ ~xt s~ ate ©ZAt ~P~ ~G-C.5 ~--Qut R-~.S \''~- P~~~-. t C,RN'f'~ -Tv NV~ K-E. ~At t_y ~ Q-a~S ~ ~~-c'O`5Q.-T ~ t Srt'1,JCa ~t~ ..~ ~ n>. CZ . ` 1 ~ € "~ Applicant ~-~ ~t-1~ ~ ~AV ~t~ R~ 1 ~`~. -.: • ~~. ~~A~s p ,~ sti,..~,,,v~ z4~~ oU~* ~ , c~ _~-- , ~ ~, ~~ a ~ y° ~ ~~ ' I Rai Q~~ ~~ $1~ ~V~G~~ LA 1 I v-- / / " ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ 3L JA'r ,-c / / * ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ J~~. u 0 Pa ~ \ ~ ~ e` ~ ~ ~ zi.z• ~y •-`~ ~ g ~ !n ri •A" Re,p.- 984.2"7' TA-.t = 25.34' Ct-10RD=S85'39'18"E 50.CoZ' ' `N'/~3z 1 j 71. ;- tI.I 4 i• 1 W N N fn 3(a.~ t - Z - So LOT 18 ~~~L~S S. Sp~c~P.n 1°Ila-It t.-J~a~R.E~ h~l~-~ 1~ ' ~.~,,~ ~ va 2.4-53 1JOTE : ~ . THE SUBJECT PROPERTY iS LOC4TED 11.1 FLOOd 11JSURAf1CE ZOUE "C" AS DESIGIJATED B`C TEIE SECRETARY OF HOUS11.lG Ai`lD URBAI.1 DEVELOPMEUT. ,; R ~>•G M /-Sly F~• r~'r ~ 2_5: T .i.~ . ~ FMtL P .• ~., /G.0 ape"~' , . : ALL i2.~N~Pv~i N~ -J~2F~1 • ~~~sc~ ~~~~ ~ L07 20 ~Sr~. ~ ~ C~(Zilt~~.~.x.-:M~onl °- ~ d' ~.o?~x loG '~ '~ ' ' ~=' ' ~ ~ SAIL-- ~~~ -> F 20 ~ ~ , . , , ,~ ~ N 3co.~ l - Z- 5 r `Or 19 1.00'T ACRE . LEGAL.. REFERENCE= P. B.9 PG. 15~ ~ ~90 00~ T Zo tp ~~yX-H Arlo ^t S~_SL~JEY KKR ' . L.4yERt~i H . B~, I RD C~A~ ~ SJ i• ~ACx s. mss BY: JACK U. BESS CERTIFIED LA1J0 SURVEYOR ,. ~, . IfiCATE Mo. 10]0 ~.a~ J P NANO `~ OF LOT 19 ~ MAp OF SECTI O-J Z ~ LAUREL. WOOS FZOAt.IOKE COULITY~ YIRGtt~1tA ~ SCAt..E: 1" = SO' ?r1AY 14 ~ 199 I U.B.~c~;o t I D-91514 • ~~ O O~ ~ ~ L11 N V W 1, ~ F ~ UR£L ~. ` G vA~ ~ ~+"' O ' ~MM 8 ~ :~`~~~%?~T::: MONT ' +124 ~~ ~,,, ,~ . ~ 311 ~, ..`.::_..,:: .. ' . ,•._sfi::•: v° ~~ ~. `~/ ~~~ °~°~ ' e ~ ES ~ ~. ~' .. =.-'' -- - ~`''! VICINITY M A P ~ v~ --- .'~°<' ~"' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING RONALD ~ CAVERN DAVIS " ~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT TAX MAP # 36.01-2-51 AND ZONING • :_ ~~ .~> . VL, - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO RONALD DAVIS AND CAVERN DAVIS TO CONSTRUCT A PRIVATE KENNEL LOCATED AT 1942 LAUREL WOODS DRIVE, (TAX PARCEL 36.01-2-51) CATAWBA MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis have filed a petition to allow the construction of a private kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on December 13, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on January 24, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a private kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Ronald Davis and Lavern Davis to allow the construction of a private kennel located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District, with the following conditions: 1 1) The private kennel shall be for a maximum of five dogs. 2) The property owner shall install and continually operate a sound-type kennel silencer. The silencer shall be installed prior to/in conjunction with the property being used for a private kennel. 3) The existing pens located near the western property line shall not be used for any animals associated with the private kennel unless relocated to a location on the property that conforms to the use and design standards guidelines. zoning\davis 2 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~uiiuiuuiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiii~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuu~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /' - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ _ ~~,~ ~- SUBJECT: }~ ~~ ~~' ~~~---, /~~ _ . - ~I /~ T~ J~ ~ iV~C - ~.-- =. = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an ~ndividuai or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time I~mit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Y ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _ -_ ~~,e~c-F'~-O'Y11~, =_ NAME o n/,~~ ~J ~~ v ~ s = ADDRESS l ~~Z_ ~~~~C,' !" I~ ~J~ ~u~ ~ •~~-1/~ PHONE _~~~~,' "-~ c? `~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~iiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiuiuuuuuiiiuiiii~uiiiuii~iiiiii~aiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ _ _ _ _ = APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS 1 SUBJECT: ~ i` ,~ - , ,~ t i~'/.~~% -= '~ ~> i ~. __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ _. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - r ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL _ Y AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ -_ NAME ~ (~ ` ~--' ~ - ~ ~ ~;;1 -_ -_ ADDRESS ~ ~`, ~ ~- ~ ~ 7 r ~_ ~_ PHONE ~~~~ ~~- ~ `~C fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ill ~iiiiuiiiiiiiuiuiiiiuiiiiuiiiuiouiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiuiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiii~i~~~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ,~ - - -_ - - APPE - CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - SUBJECT: - -_ - - =_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. -. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND G - TVE TO THE CLERK - - _ = _ _ _ = _ _ c - - c _ = ~~ ~, NAME ~.%j -~ , ._ - - __ -. ADDRESS ~' ` _ _ ~ ~ ~~, ~= _ PHONE , '-_ i ~. ~~, c fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r11'I'I 1Uilll~~~~llllllllllllilllll~l~~l~lllllllliillll~ll~lllllllll~~lll~l~lll~llllllillliillliillilllllllliillllililllllllllllllillllllllJ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. GI - - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS suBJECT: .-~ ~, °~a _ _ =. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oi~the Board to do otherwise. -_ c _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = = _ = - - _ _ c = _ - _ - - - - - - J-- , - NAME :~~, ~~.:r% ~' ~ `~'~ ~;:~ i t - - - - - - ADDRESS_ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~,~"'. ~!. ~.~ ,-'rte ) - - PHOAiE ~ ,7 Il mlllllilllllllilllliillllllilllllllllllllll I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiilllllllllllllllilllilllllliilllllllllllllllllllillilllllllli 111111 ~ t AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVI8OR8 OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, JANIIARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE 12495-15 GRANTING A BPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO THE ROANORE COIINTY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONBTRIICT AND OPERATE A POLICE OIITDOOR FIREARMS TRAINING RANGE LOCATED AT 6231 TWINE HOLLOW ROAD (TA% PARCEL 63.00-1-14), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County Police Department has filed a petition to allow the construction and operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on November 22, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on January 24, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction and operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Roanoke County Police Department to allow the construction and operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located 1 at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District subject to the following condition: (a) That the use of the police outdoor firearms training range will be limited to the law enforcements departments of the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to grant the Special Use Permit with condition (a) added, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Arnold Covey, Director, John W. Birckhead, Real John Cease, Chief of Po Paul M. Mahoney, County A COPY TESTE: ~ ~ 'V ~-~ Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Director, Planning & Zoning Engineering & Inspections Estate Assessment Lice Attorney 2 DEC 13 '94 09~ 25AM DRAPER ADErLASSOC. BLRCKSBURG, `,'A'"'"~~ ~ . - • 22 ;' ~=~ ;~ .~ ~• 1. . . .. ::. ~~~ . .. r~ ~ •~ I ~ .a :: ~i ~ r? r` ;~ ~ 30 ~ .; ; .;; ; j `;~,,.. . ,~. . r ~~. _ r _ . t. ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ r 111'•. ~' ~, ' ~~' ' 1 ~• :1,~~, ~ .~.: •~, ~ uNpA~ .. ~ :150 YARDS ~ ~ ~ :~ r: ~~ I~ .. ..r. ,::- '~ ' ; r ~.oMB~-r .p Ise o~-.. ' ~' ~ ~ ~ -~. Guy ~~ ~ ,1. ~'~ ~~. . MUNI rPA L , ~ ~ ~ \~ .~..~ ASrE l5~0.~5 ~ AR ~ ~, ~ ..~ , , ~REbIM t,Kte. AYOU'Z' ~• . - 1 ~,~ ~" . ~:~ I . ~ ~ ~. . a -`I~TXiE ~CA~RNS LANL~`ILI:.- - ~ \ ~~.~e f: I".~ loo' / ~ ~\ \, ~ O ~" v v '~ `' \ J~ a l?OC f r 1i-_ ~4 -__ ~~__ <raco .r6ca '- c 'ExJ ~ } ~.~ •~ ti J 13 ~ . ¢ ' ? G~' _ _ ~ _ Q ~P 910 -• o ~ i .c`;\~ b1 ~`'' ::VICINITY MAP ~-J'• " a~F ~ i . ~ y ~ ~t• ~ ~ ' f~~ ~- •e 1 / ' ~.' `' • ~~~.~ ~V •. / / ' i^•` V ~ '/ \ I T ~~' DEPAR ROPNC:i_ C:,'1:^_ t'0~•=CE D'_rzaic.~ "~ _ ~ ~~ 'IMFN'r OF PI~ANIJII~G Sf f C IA r • '.'~ ~ r -: •: ~ .: AND ZONING 53.00-1-1 ~.,~ U-b NORTH ).. Y.r t).0! ~ . M1t00' ~„ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE NUMBER: 37-12/94 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 24, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Police Department for a Special Use Permit to construct and operate a police outdoor firearms training range, located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the caliber of rifles used and if there is a noise problem at the present site. Captain LaPrade responded as follows: the rifles are in the 223 and 308 category; not aware of any noise problems. Staff responded to questions from the Commission as follows: the berms will be approximately six to eight feet high and will be located below the slope. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the request with no conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: Thomason ABSENT: Witt F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Thomason said the site is an ideal location and the range is definitely needed; however he expressed concern with safety and asked if a fence could be installed to keep out small children who might wander into the area. He said he could not vote for the shooting range unless the area is fenced. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other •~ n ~-- 1- >. Terrance Ha ~ gton, Secr~ary Roanoke County Plannirg Commission ~~ Y • STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Roanoke Co. Police Dept. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FILE NO.: 37-12/94 DATE PREPARED:11/29/94 The Roanoke County Police Department is requesting a Special Use Permit for a firearms training range proposed on a portion of the former Dixie Caverns Landfill located at the end of Twine Hollow Road. The proposal would in no way interfere with the remedial treatment and disposal activities underway on the property as required by the EPA. The location and site design are favorable since it is a remote location and utilizes the terrain to ensure public safety. B. DESCRIPTION The Roanoke County Police Department is requesting a Special Use permit to construct an outdoor firearms training range (shooting range) at the former Dixie Caverns landfill. The property, which contains 66.7 acres, is located at the end of Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial district. A portion of the site, approximately 15 to 20 acres, would be used for the shooting range. It is presently zoned AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve district. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Shooting ranges are permitted in the AG-3 district only after a special use permit has been approved by the Board of Supervisors. Specific standards which must be met include controlling access by posting or fencing the property and locating the firing point at least 100 feet from property lines in all directions and at least 300 feet from a property line along the line of fire. Prior to establishment, the shooting range and all related structures and buildings will need to be approved through the site plan review process. t ;, ~.. PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Characteristics The site proposed for the shooting range is located at the former Dixie Caverns Landfill on the lower slopes of Fort Lewis Mountain. The range would be sited on a plateau area which slopes gradually to moderately upward towards a steep cut slope created when cover material was excavated while the site was actively used as a landfill. To the west and north minor ridges create a natural basin, while to the east is a major drainageway which bisects the former landfill site. The range site is sparsely vegetated with scrub growth and grasses interspersed throughout essentially barren unvegetated areas. The property was formerly used as the Roanoke County landfill from 1965 to 1976. The County is presently evaluating closure and postclosure activities to improve water and leachate management at the site. This could include the construction of drainage channels in various locations on the property, minor regrading to improve drainage, installation of improvements to the leachate collection system, and other improvements. The County is also under orders from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conduct a remedial treatment and disposal project for selected wastes determined by EPA to be potentially hazardous. Construction of the improvements to comply with this order were initiated in the Fall of 1994. While portions of the proposed shooting range would be located on areas actively used for municipal waste, none of the closure/post-closure activities or the remedial treatment and disposal project will interfere with or be affected by the proposed shooting range. Surrounding Neighborhood The general area is a combination of mountainous wooded open space, rural residential development and industrial land uses. The former landfill property is surrounded to the north east and west by essentially undeveloped wooded land, with the exception of Atlas Powder Co., an explosives distributor. Located south of the property are scattered residences along Twine Hollow and Mecham Roads, an inactive quarry, a small manufacturing plant, and two abandoned industrial sites. Access and Traffic Access to the site is solely by way of Twine Hollow Road (State Route 778). State maintenance ends at the property boundary of the former landfill property and is shared by Atlas Powder Co. From this point access to the proposed shooting range is by way of a paved and then gravel one-lane road of moderate to steep grade. In 1986, Twine Hollow Road had 472 average trips per day (ADT). Beyond Mecham Road, a side road accessible only from Twine Hollow, this number drops to 103 ADT. Petition: Roanoke Co. Police Dept. 2 File No.: 37-12/94 -~ B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Background A firearms training range is an essential facility for law enforcement personnel. Each officer is required to be recertified in firearms at least once a year. Exposure to potential liability can be reduced with more frequent training and practice. The site in question was formerly used by the Sheriff's Department as a training range prior to 1986, but was discontinued due to potential health issues raised by EPA at the former landfill site. After using the Salem firing range for a short period, the Sheriff's Dept. (now Police Department) have used a range owned by Norfolk & Southern Railroad located in the Shaffers Crossing area. Since this site is shared with the City of Roanoke and various federal agencies, scheduling of training has become problematic. Anew facility would allow greater flexibility in scheduling training. (See attached letter from Captain LaPrade for additional explanation.) Site Operation, Layout and Improvements The proposed firing range is envisioned at this point to be exclusively for the use of law enforcement officials, with no access or use by the general public. At this time the County Police Department is negotiating with the City of Roanoke to establish the range as a joint project. Other County offices, such as the Sheriffs Office, might also use the facility. As a joint City/County project usage is anticipated to be limited, with possibly 20 officers using the site on a given day, on a weekly or bimonthly basis. Occasionally, competitions might be held between regional law enforcement personnel, attracting as many as 50 to 100 people. The proposed site would consist of two pistol ranges with turning targets, a pistol combat range, and a rifle range, each separated by an earthen berm. A range tower with PA system would be installed to monitor and direct range activities. Covered bleachers enclosed on three sides would be erected near the pistol ranges for viewing. Other improvements proposed at this time include a two room classroom building, storage buildings for equipment, and parking facilities. Flood lights would be located strategically throughout the site to facilitate night time training. Additional training equipment associated with the firing range may be added as the need and funding allow. No firearms or ammunition would be stored on site. Based on the concept plan submitted, the proposed layout complies with all setback requirements for a shooting range. (See attached concept plans.) Traffic Generation No detailed independent trip generation rates are available for a facility of this nature. However, based on the usage described above, an additional 20 to 40 ADT can be anticipated on days the range is used, with up to 150 ADT for competitions. Utilities There are no public services currently available to the site. Aseptic system and well will need to be installed to serve the facilities. Petition: Roanoke Co. Police Dept. 3 File No.: 37-12/94 ... Impacts to Surrounding Uses The proposed site is fairly isolated from other uses which might be negatively impacted by a firing range. The closest residences are located beyond the ridge to the west on Mecham Road. The Police Department has conducted a series of noise tests at the firing range site and on the access road to the site. These tests showed no appreciable increase in noise levels over the background noises. With prevailing winds from the west and no residences to the east and downwind for more than 1 /2 mile, noise should not be a significant problem under normal conditions. However, noise impacts can be affected by a variety of factors causing the shooting range to be heard by residences on Twine Hollow and Mecham Roads. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed shooting range is located in an area designed in the Rural Preserve land use category by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. While the specific use proposed is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, the nature of the use in terms of safety and potential noise warrants a remote location isolated from residential development. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed location provides one of the more accessible locations in the County which is also generally isolated from residential development. The proposed layout capitalizes on the terrain by utilizing former cut slopes as a backstop to the firing range. While the access road is limited in width, the volume of traffic which can be anticipated at this time should not pose a severe burden on the existing road network. The. one issue which is difficult to overcome is the potential. noise that would be generated. However, the closest residences are located to the west, which based on prevailing winds would be upwind from the site. Therefore under many conditions the noise should not be disruptive to residences in the general vicinity. Petition: Roanoke Co. Police Dept. 4 File No.: 37-12/94 For staff use onty ' `~ ~`~ • • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. S~V P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date receiveQd: received by' / ~~ iC/5i 1~4N +CG~T application fee: PCiBZA dater ~ /c i4 y ~;/,~ Z placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: /~ /l. ~~ ~{{ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Roanoke County Police Department Phone: 561-8077 Address: 3568 Peters Creek Road NW Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24019 Owner's name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Phone: 772-2005 Address: PO Box 29800 Zip Code:. 24018 Roanoke, VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 63.00-1-14 031 `T`wine Hollow Road Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AG-3 66.7 acres Existing Land Use: vacant; forr,:er site of Dixie Caverns Landfill sq.ft. ::_:: Proposed Zoning: AG-3 (No Change) ~.sra~use o~iy Proposed Land Use: Police Outdoor Firearms Training Range Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES P~/A NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: N/A Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan / Application fee '' Application `t:.:. Metes and bounds description ~~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ,~ ~ :fig; Water and sewer application / Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~. ~~q~,~ ~ ~ ~~y~ ~,}..,~~ ~/-~~ ~Q2~~ O~ FiOA~y ~ L • F ~l Roanoke County °A"°K~ POLICE Police Department c°UN'~y Services Division • • October 18, 1994 Mr. Jonathan W. Hartley County of Roanoke Planning & Zoning ~~ 3568 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Office: 703/561-8076 Fax: 703!561-8114 The Roanoke County Police Department (formerly the Sheriff's Department) used part of the Dixie Caverns Landfill for a firearms training range until 1986, when it was determined that some areas there were not safe. When that area was not available, the department was forced to borrow the City of Salem range, which was located at their landfill, when times could be arranged around Salem's schedule. Since the Salem range was most adequately furnished for law enforcement firearms training needs, it became the "range of choice" for several area law enforcement firearms training activities and scheduling quickly became a problem. In 1989, Norfolk Southern Railroad had a firearms range available. The Norfolk Southern range is located in Northwest Roanoke in the area of the Shaffers Crossing railroad property. Since that time, most of our police department's firearms training has been conducted there. Due to the increasing liability placed upon firearms training in law enforcement agencies, and by most ~` 4~ agencies increasing their training above minimum standards, scheduling of range time at Norfolk Southern's range has become a significant problem. Many law enforcement agencies including the City of Roanoke and federal agencies use Norfolk Southern also. Although Norfolk Southern allows us to use their facility, range dates must be scheduled on an average of six months ahead. Any specialized or other needs such as individualized officer or remedial training must be drastically curtailed or not held at all. All sworn officers of the police department must successfully complete firearms recertification semi-annually. In order for all officers to be recertified, it requires a minimum of a full work week. In summary, the Commonwealth of Virginia mandates minimum annual firearms training standards for law enforcement officers and additional training to minimize liability issues is needed. The accomplishment of this training is the responsibility of each department. With no police department firearms training range and having to rely on "borrowing" other facilities, firearms training has become a most significant problem. Litigation stemming from firearms training/use/policies is a major concern for government agencies from the local to the federal level. It is imperative for us to insure that our officers receive proper training to help minimize the risk of their safety, the public's safety, and reduce liability to the County. The Dixie Caverns site was chosen for several reasons. The site was used previously and served our training needs +~` ` very adequately. It is the only County property located thus far that has the space for a firearms training range and that is located in a suitable area. There are no residential lots that adjoin the requested range area. The police department feels that one major positive point concerning the requested use area is that it was not a direct part of the hazardous waste area. There is "fill" underground in the area but it has not been part of the hazardous waste clean-up process. Access to the proposed site is basically "one way in and one way out". When the police department (formerly the sheriff's department) used the range previously, access was by a locked steel gate. If the range site was available, it would be used on a weekly to bi-weekly basis. The location of a law enforcement firearms training range in the rural preserve area as designated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan is not directly addressed within the plan policies. However, given the need for an isolated location that is safe and secure, and does not jeopardize the safety of the general public, the more remote the location the better. The Dixie Caverns site meets these needs. D. A. LaPrade, Captain DEC 13 '94 09~25AM DRAPER ADEN_ASSOC.BLACKS .-~ ~ '.''%~• '~) .~ / . ~ ~ ~ - .\ :\ Y ~ r { .. . ~ \ .. ~ j ~`~~ • ~ S 1 \ .~ y~ ~ ' _ `~ '~~ ~buNOAR ~ . • :150 YARDS : • ~ :. ~ .i ~; t:. !f 1 ~ ~1 ~. ., ., I ~`, , iY ! '' . t'1 - ~ ~ ~ ~.pr%1B~T _ p iS7 ~L-.. ~~ ~ ~-. ~ :~~~~ ~ Guy f,, ~ • ~~ =~~• ~~,,, 1 i` - ..._ _PlS7aL ..RAN GE,~-; ~ . _ - C ,~ _ ASrE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~. 50.•5 ~C~AR ~ . 't-~w. -- - ~XIE ~CrAV~RNS LANISP`tLL- ~" ~ 1 SC~.LE f : ~".~ too' / \ ~\ .~~~ i• Q NORTH • ~~~ ~' . ~ -~'_~ S.. u~~ 6102 M1xoo' `~ ~o r ~(~.- '~'%',/ ' ~``~' V m ~¢ ~` l.0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ROANORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A POLICE OUTDOOR FIREARMS TRAINING RANGE LOCATED AT 6231 TWINE HOLLOW ROAD (TAX PARCEL 63.00-1-14), CATAWBA MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County Police Department has filed a petition to allow the construction and operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on November 22, 1994; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on January 24, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction and operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the Roanoke County Police Department to allow the construction and 1 ~+~ operation of a police outdoor firearms training range to be located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. c:\wp51 \agenda\zoning\police 2 1~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIiIlliilllllilllllill111111111111111111111111111111111111 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. .- - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~~ CITIZENS COMMENTS = _ - _ - _ - ~ - ~-- - = SUBJECT: ' ~f~=/~/~ '//~'% c~- fl- " %/F~ < ,4' ~~/ G%F ~~",~'~%,~~~ s L'~'i~0~~~=c> _ - -. = K` ~~~iAG Div! P~'cY"E.('iif.7 - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a resentatio = n of their point of view only. _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - _ - _ - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - ._ - - NAME ~~~ r jrz./ ~,~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ADDRESS -~ % _s`~> ~i~~~,~-~Ci~~ ~ j c = _. - PHONE ~ ~' _ - :~ ~>/~ _.. _~ mlilllllllllllillllliillllllllllllillillllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIillllillillllillllllllillilllililiillllllllllllllillllllllllllil 111111111 O~ AOANp,~.~ L ti z c~ z ou a~ 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C~~~t~t~ ~~ ~a~xx~.a.~~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 January 27, 1995 The Honorable David S. Bowers Mayor, City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 The Honorable Charles R. Hill Mayor, Town of Vinton P. O. Box 338 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mayor Bowers and Mayor Hill: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 12495-4 authorizing the conveyance of Roanoke County's interest in certain real estate (Regional Sanitary Landfill) to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, subjecting said property to certain protective covenants, and certain other provisions. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, January 24, 1995. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gardner Smith, Chairman, RVRA John R. Hubbard, Executive Director, RVRA Dr. Rupert Cutler, Virginia Explore Park Gary Everhardt, Superintendent, Blue Ridge Parkway ®~ 0~ ~OANp,~~ ~ A z c~ ~ z J a~ 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 January 27, 1995 The Honorable David S. Bowers Mayor, City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mayor Bowers: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 12495-1 authorizing the execution of an addendum to the 1979 Water Contract with the City of Roanoke. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, January 24, 1995. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, y ~,I . Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ® Recycled Paper v' County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington AICP ~ ~~ Director of Planning DATE: January 10, 1995 RE: Status of Proffer Conformance; Postal Drive Properties Mr. Kevin R. Orcutt, who resides at 2759 Hillbrook Drive may attend your meeting on January 24, to discuss the status of the proffer conformance for properties located along Postal Drive. Early last summer the Board evaluated and approved a rezoning request submitted by Lionberger Construction Company to modify a buffer yard proffer for property along Postal Drive. The property was eventually developed as an office for Pediatrics Associates. During these 1994 zoning hearings, residents of the adjacent subdivision along Hillbrook Drive notified the staff and the Board that some of the proffers that were applied to the property when it was originally rezoned in 1981 were not being met. These proffers included three proffers related to lighting, dumpster enclosures, and overhead power lines. The exact wording of these proffers is as follows: 5. All utility lines will be installed underground in accordance with utility company specifications and requirements. 6. All refuse containers will be adequately screened from view. 7. All lighting within the property shall be adequate and shall not be a hindrance to any residence adjacent to the property. As these proffers were applied to the entire 12.26 acre tract, prior to its subdivision into lots, they are applicable to all of the lots within the Postal Drive office complex. The staff has discussed the screening and lighting proffers with the representatives of the current owners of the properties bound by these proffers. Although they were not aware of these proffers at the time they purchased their properties, they are willing to screen dumpsters, and evaluate changes in lighting. Because of the poor wording of the lighting proffer, it is difficult for the staff to advise these property owners what level of lighting constitutes a "hinderance to any residence adjacent to the property". Regarding the proffer concerning the underground utility lines, Mr. Gubala and I met with representatives of APCO, Lionberger Construction, and the original owner of the property (Maury Strauss) early last summer to discuss why the existing overhead line was installed, and the possibility of relocating the line underground in accordance with the proffered condition. It was determined at this meeting, that the existing overhead line on the property does not lie within the utility easement, but rather exists overhead on the basis of an "agreement" between APCO and Mr. Strauss. A formal utility easement apparently exists along the mutual property line with the residences on Hillbrook. According to representatives of APCO and Mr. Strauss, the line was installed outside of the easement in the early 1980's for the purpose of saving all of the trees that separate the homes from these commercial properties. It was not installed underground because of the lack of a formal easement in that location. At this meeting, Mr. Strauss indicated a willingness to pay the full cost of having APCO install the line underground in the existing easement along the property line. There was the general consensus, that such an installation would necessitate the removal of all of the vegetation separating these homes from the office development. Given the concern expressed by three of the neighbors at the Pediatric Associates public hearings (Mrs. Baker, Mr. Meador, and Mr. Orcutt), the staff did not believe it was in the best long term interests of the neighbors to have this line installed underground as part of the Pediatric Associates development. At the time, Mrs. Baker agreed to this decision, as she wished to save the trees behind her property, and the burial site of her dog which she had inadvertently buried on the Pediatric Associates site. Mr. Meador was no longer a resident of Hillbrook at this time. The matter was not discussed with Mr. Orcutt. once all of the dumpsters are screened, and some possible changes are made to the site lighting, the overhead powerlines will remain as the remaining proffer issue. The staff suggests that within the next several months the Board consider a request to modify this proffer to allow these existing lines to stay in their present location. The staff is of the opinion that it is not in the best short or long term interest of the adjacent property owners to require these lines to be underground in the existing easement, and thus destroy all of the existing vegetation along the property line. This vegetation currently serves as a very effective screen along most of the property line, and to remove it for the purpose of installing an overhead line that has been in place for close to ten years, seems counter productive to the larger purposes of zoning and proffers in general. O~ POANp,~,~ L ~ p z c> Z °~ a~ 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 January 13, 1995 Ms. Margaret S. Beazley 6206 Saddleridge Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Beazley: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Cave Spring Knights Booster Club for a raffle permit and 50/50 raffle permit for Calendar Year 1995. The raffle will be conducted on February 10, 1995, and 50/50 raffles on the dates as specified in the application. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffles are to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1995. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT: YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY DECEMBER l OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DA7ES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 3l OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®,P~ O~ AOANp~.~ ti p z ~ ~ az 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 January 17, 1995 E. Cabell Brand, Chairman TAP Board of Directors 957 Kime Lane P. O. Box 429 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Brand: C v~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNCX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Thank you for your letter of January 5 regarding potential cuts from the state and federal government to TAP. I would like to invite you and the County's representative Elizabeth Stokes to attend our January 24 Board of Supervisors meeting to request a letter from the Board to Governor Allen and Congressman Goodlatte opposing state and federal cuts to TAP and the federal Community Services Block Grant program. This will provide an opportunity for TAP to describe how the cuts will affect your programs. Please let Board Clerk Mary Allen (772-2003) know if you and Ms. Stokes will be able to attend the January 24 meeting as soon as possible so we may place your request on the agenda. The meeting will begin at 3:00 p. m. in our Board Meeting Room located at the Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive. Sincerely, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator CC: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, TAP Board Member Members of the Board of Supervisors Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board C~.o~tx~t~ o~~ ~o~txr.a~te ® gecyged Paper I~VI ~ M E M O R A N D U M To: Board of Supervisors y~~~ From: Elmer C. Hodge ~/( Date: December 9, 1994 Subject: Work Session with School Board and School Personnel on Structure of Teachers' Salary Scale During last year's budget process, we were told that deficiencies existed in the salary scale for County teachers. The Board asked staff to determine what the deficiencies were and what might be done to correct them. We have met with members of the School Salary Committee and consider the deficiencies to be rather complicated. Some teachers' salaries, depending on length of service, compare favorably with their counterparts in neighboring systems. Mid-range salaries are quite a bit out of line and need to be adjusted. Because of the issue's complexity, I have asked representatives of the school system to meet with us prior to commencing work on the budget so that we may all fully understand the problem and discuss what might be done to correct it. This is similar to what we did last year when we conducted a salary survey for the County government employees. This would be an excellent opportunity for us to work with the new School Board members since salaries and employee benefits are, of course, the jurisdiction of the Superintendent and School Board. I have coordinated this with Dr. Gordon, and we suggest having the joint session on January 24. This will provide an opportunity for the newly elected School Board members to first attend their orientation session, which I believe is scheduled for January il. At the joint meeting, Dr. Gordon and I will make some introductory remarks. Jerry Hardy will provide some information, and Butch Kelly will arrange to have teachers present the information that has been accumulated. It will be similar to a presentation made to the School Board last year during the budget process, but the material has been updated. -2- Any amendments to the teachers' salary scale will have to be made by the School Superintendent and School Board. We will continue to work with Dr. Gordon throughout the budget process to provide information on what funding alternatives are available. ECH/meh cc - Roanoke County School Board Mr. Michael W. Stovall, School Board Member-elect Mr. Thomas A. Leggette, School Board Member-elect Dr. Deanna W. Gordon, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Richard J. Kelly, President, Roanoke County Education Association ~~ ~ 7 ~ ~ d r ECH: Talked with Butch Kelley re December 13 work session - Teachers Salaries. I told him to call you this week (because you were going out of town) to set up meeting to discuss work session and suggested that you all meet around December 5 or 6. I also told him to call me around December 6 because we'll have an idea of what's on agenda to set time for work session. Mary A. 11/7/94 '• ~ R AN ~ pF '~c~` r ti , f ~ ~ ~ 2 ~: a ~3 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 ~~~t~~ ~~ ~Or~~~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 October 27, 1994 Mr. Butch Kelly, President Roanoke County Education Association William Byrd High School 2902 Washington Avenue Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Kelly: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE B. EDDY, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR.. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERUL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERL4L DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 I apologize for the confusion about the work session to discuss teacher salaries. It was tentatively scheduled for October 25, but when you did not contact me to discuss plans for the work session or contact the Board Clerk for a specific time, we assumed that it was canceled. I have rescheduled the work session for December 13 because I will be out of town at the time of the November meeting. I want to get with you a week or so before that meeting to plan the work session with the Board of Supervisors. Please call my secretary, Mary Hicks, to schedule an appointment. Again, my apologies for the confusion. Sincerely, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator CC: Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board ® ~elyase P>~ 1/18/95 9:15 a.m. Mr. Hodge Gary Robertson called and said that he heard from Bill Aden about report at Jan 24 board meeting. Mr. Aden cannot be at that meeting and suggested that the report be postponed until meeting in February. If you must have it at Jan 24th, he can send somebody else to do it but Gary said that he would rather wait and let Mr. Aden give the report. If you want to discuss, call Gary. Brenda note to file LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, SW, to consider the vacating and closing of an unimproved section of old road lying between properties owned by Stranna Arthur, et als, (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-12) and the County School Board of Roanoke County (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11), and extending in a northeasterly direction through property of Honeywood Associates (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-10) to the existing Ogden Road. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the County Attorney's Office, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 6th day of January, 1995. ~~~ ~. Mary H. en, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Police Department for a Special Use Permit to construct and operate a police outdoor firearms training range, located at 6231 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: January 4, 1995 ~. Mary H. A len, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Police Department Attn: D. A. LaPrade 3568 Peters Creek Road NW Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 561-8077 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO8 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, SW, to consider vacating and closing a 0.220-acre strip of unused and unimproved public right-of-way bounded on the east side by the existing right-of-way for Ogden Road (Route 681') and bounded on the west side by a parcel of land known as the Ogden Center Property (Tax Map No. 77.15-1-11) and to authorize sale of said parcel as part of the Ogden Center Property. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the County Attorneys Office, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 6th day of January, 1995. Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 I?irect the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on January 24, 1995, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 62894-15 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168, "SCHEDULE OF CHARGES" OF CHAPTER 18, "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL" AND AMENDING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES" OF CHAPTER 22, "WATER" TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO OFF-SITE FACILITY FEES FOR MOTEL/HOTEL ESTABLISHMENTS All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Paul M. ahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 Send invoice to: -,-- , -. Board of Supervisors ~~_ ~ ~' f P. O. Box 29800 ! -~~1==J Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ' , 3 ~~~ ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Ronald & Lavern Davis for a Special Use Permit to construct a private kennel, located at 1942 Laurel Woods Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: January 4, 1995 Mary H. len, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 To be paid on delivery by: Ronald & Lavern Davis 1942 Laurel Mtn. Drive Salem, VA 24153 (703) 389-3047 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, SW, on the petition of Gary M. Greenlee and Holly L. Greenlee requesting vacation of a portion of an existing 15-foot sanitary sewer easement and accepting a relocated portion of same easement located on Lot 9, Block 6, One Oak Road. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the County Attorney's Office, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this S~ z'1 day of January, 1995. /~ ~ Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, January 10, 1995 Tuesday, January 17, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 CL1 G~Fcy ,~.t~ ~ FtOAlyO~ F /~, . 2 C1 a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOO 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA .24153 D ~~ _~~~~ January 13, 1995 T0: rs. Mary Allen FROM: uth Wade Enclosed is an item for the January 24, 1995 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. If necessary, Dr. Jerry Hardy will attend the meeting. Enclosure c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge