Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/14/1995 - RegularpF R AN ~F ~. Z ~ o _ a (~.o~ixz~tg .a~ ~.~~tx~~~.e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 14, 1995 i~wn a' na fur roa Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday aad the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement In order to participate in or attend Boani of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Irnocation: The Reverend David Elks Minister of Education and Adults Vinton Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ® Recycled Paper ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ADDED ITEM P-1 REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION FOR RENOVATIONS TO CAVE SPRING TLnvTOR HIGH SCHOOL AND ITEM C-2. RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MARGARET MOLES EGK ASKED THAT ITEM T-1, APPOINTMENTS BE DEFERRED C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring the Month of March 1995 as Purchasing Month in Roanoke County. ACCEPTED BY KAY TOHNSTON, PRESIDENT OF ROANOKE CHAPTER OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PURCHASING MANAGEMENT EGK MOTION TO ADOPT PROCLAMATION - URC 2. Resolution of Congratulations to Margaret S. Moles Upon Being Selected Virginia's National Distinguished Principal. R-31495-1 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC FM WILL PRESENT AT RECEPTION IN HER HONOR D. BRIEFINGS NONE E NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Adoption of Primary and Interstate Projects for Virginia Department of Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Cwey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) R-31495-2 BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE 2 URC 2. Request from the Sheriff for Authorization to Transfer Funds into the Inmate Medical Copayment Program. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) A-31495-3 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE TRANSFER OF FUNDS WITH RESOLUTION BROUGHT BACK TO 3/28 MEETING OUTLINING ACTION - URC 3. Request to Participate in a Water Line Extension on Loch Haven Road to Serve Honeycutt Veterinarian Clinic. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) A-31495-4 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION AYES-EGK,LBE,HCN.FM NAYS-NONE ABSTAIN-BIT F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE IL FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Water and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions Upon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) 3 DAVID COUREY SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO MOlV1'I~Y BILLING LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 3/28/95 URC LBE WILL MAKE SUGGESTED CHANGES TO ORDINANCE WORDING 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations and 12-52, Parking on Streets and Highways Generally to Authorize the Enforcement of Zoning Violations Involving the Unlawful Parking of Vehicles by the Issuance of Parking Tickets for Such Violations. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT ORDINANCE WILL BE AMENDED BASED ON COMII~NTS INCLUDING A WARNING NOTICE AND TICKETS ON PUBLIC ROADWAY ONLY 2ND READING - 3/28/95 URC L SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Extension of Agreement with Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for use of County Property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. (Timothy W. Gubala, Economic Development Director) R 31495-5 BIIT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC J. APPO S 1. Industrial Development Authority. DEFERRED K. CONSENT AGENDA 4 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTIIVE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-31495-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Approval of Minutes -February 14, 1995, February 28, 1995. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., Upon His Appointment to the State Supreme Court. R-31495-6.a 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Plantation Grove Subdivision. A 31495-6.b 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards, Section 8. A-31495-6.c 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program. A-31495-6.d L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Nickens: (1) Expressed concern that the City of Roanoke requested Special Use Permits for stormwater detention basins before they had the proper authority. (2) Agreed with LBE's budget memo and will look at all expenses with a sharp eye. s Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Expressed concern regarding FOI articles in the newspaper and felt that certain items must be discussed in private such as offers for property and settlement of law suits, and that the Board must certify what was discussed in executive sessions. Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Visited Transkrit and Medeco and thanked Toyice Waugh for her assistance. (2) Attended a luncheon forum for Moorhead Kennedy from the U. S. Foreign Service on Wednesday and thanked David Wvmer for setting up. (3) Expressed appreciation to the Catawba/Mason Cwe Rescue Squads for finding youth who were lost on Dragon Tooth. Supervisor Eddy~1) Thanked staff for new citizen handbook. AMG reported on where handbook can be picked up~2) Asked whether Roanoke Countv Todav show on monthly utility billing should be aired before is approved. AMG advised they will announce that the ordinance is only being considered. (3) Asked MHA if there has been any response to request to form Organ Donor Commission. ECH advised that this is being considered at next Salem City Council meeting. (4) Asked when the Customer Satisfaction Survey will take place. AMG Advised around Mme. Asked PMM to make sure all executive sessions involve only issues that are legal. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Gordon Willis asked him to speak in support of the Smart Road at the VDOT public hearing and asked Board consensus for him to express support.~2) Concerned about trash, etc. along Route 419; Colonial Avenue and other areas. Suggested emphasis on cleanup of roadways on Clean Valley Day on April 1. M. CITIZENS' COD~IlVIENTS AND CO1~~IIVILTNICATIONS 1. Paula Bittinger and others Speaking on Behalf of Citizens Concerned about Road Construction and Development of the 221 Corridor. 11 CITIZENS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO 4-IANING OF ROUTE 221 P Y BECAUSE IT WOULD ENCOURAGE ADDITIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA, 2. Gordon Saul on Behalf of the Back Creek Civic League, Speaking on Road Improvements to Route 221. SPOKE IN SUPPORT ON ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO ROUTE 221 JEFF ECHOES. VDOT SPOKE ON THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR CITIZEN COMMENT DURING THE LOCATION AND DESIGN PROCESS. 3. Terek Morsie spoke concerning alleged harassment by the police department who are checking licenses on his vehicles. FM SUGGESTED THAT HE CONTACT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HIM N. REPORTS BI;T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 8-UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -February 1995 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability Per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 1995. 6. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of February 28, 1995. 7. Report on Results of the 1995 Virginia General Assembly. 8. Report on Bulk and Brush Collection ECH WILL PREPARE MEMO TO BOARD ON COST OF BULK AND BRUSH COLLECTION O. WORK SESSION (5:00 P.M.) 1. Budget Work Session with School Board BEGAN AT 5:45 P.M. ALL SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT HCN ASKED FOR NUMBER OF SCHOOL BOARD EMPLOYEES ADDED TO PAYROLL BI.~T AND LBE ASKED THAT STAFF LOOK AT A MANAGED HEALTH CARE PROGRAM TO OFFER EMPLOYEES A CHOICE DISCUSSION ON TEACHER SALARIES. $10.1 NIILLION BOND ISSUE, IMPROVEMENTS TO CAVE SPRING TR, HIGH, ROOF REPAIRS AND COUNTY AND SCHOOL DEBT. P. 1VEW BUSINESS 1. Request from School Board to Approve a Reimbursement Resolution for Renovations to Cave Spring Junior High School. R 31495-7 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AMENDED THAT REIMBURSEMENT NOT EXCEED $500,000 AYES-LBE,HCN,FM NAYS-BisT,EGK P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS NONE Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Disposition of Publicly held property; 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Use of Real Estate of the School Board located in North County. BIT MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 7:25 P.M. WITH SCHOOL BOARD 9 vRc SCHOOL BOARD LEFT AT 8:20 R CERTI'F'ICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-31495-8 BL.T MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 8:24 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION - URC S. ADJOtifRNMENT BI;T MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 8:25 - UW io ~ pOAN ,~.~ ti Z o a r C~~~tx~#~ ~~ ~~~xx~~~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 14, 1995 ,~~~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Irrvocation: The Reverend David Elks Minister of Education and Adults Vinton Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i ® Recycled Paper C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring the Month of March 1995 as Purchasing Month in Roanoke County. D. BRIEFINGS E NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Adoption of Primary and Interstate Projects for Virginia Department of Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Request from the Sheriff for Authorization to Transfer Funds into the Inmate Medical Copayment Program. (Sheriff Gerald Holt) 3. Request to Participate in a Water Line Extension on Loch Haven Road to Serve Honeycutt Veterinarian Clinic. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Water and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions Upon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) 2 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations and 12-52, Parking on Streets and Highways Generally to Authorize the Enforcement of Zoning Violations Irnolving the Unlawful Parking of Vehicles by the Issuance of Parking Tickets for Such Violations. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) I. J• K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Extension of Agreement with Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for use of County Property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. (Timothy W. Gubala, Economic Development Director) APPOINTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WH.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WH.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 14, 1995, February 28, 1995. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., Upon His Appointment to the State Supreme Court. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Plantation Grove Subdivision. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving 3 The Orchards, Section 8. 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Paula Bittinger and others Speaking on Behalf of Citizens Concerned about Road Construction and Development of the 221 Corridor. 2. Gordon Saul on Behalf of the Back Creek Civic League, Speaking on Road Improvements to Route 221. N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -February 1995 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability Per Irnestments and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 1995. 6. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of February 28, 1995. 7. Report on Results of the 1995 Virginia General Assembly. 8. Report on Bulk and Brush Collection O. WORK SESSION (5:00 P.M.) 4 1. Budget Work Session with School Board P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Disposition of Publicly held property; 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Use of Real Estate of the School Board located in North County. R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION S. ADJOiJRNMENT 5 ~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1995 AS PURCHASING MONTH IN ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has a significant impact on the quality, efficiency, and profitability of businesses and governments; and WHEREAS, purchasing and materials management professionals purchase goods and services, execute, implement, and administer contracts, develop forecasts and procurement strategies, supervise the flow and storage of materials, and work to meet the goals of their organizations; and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management professional has a tremendous influence on economic conditions in the United States, with an accumulative purchasing power running into billions of dollars; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Chapter of the National Association of Purchasing Management-Virginia, Inc. is sponsoring educational events and activities to raise awareness about their profession. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in recognition of the achievements of the purchasing and materials management professional, do hereby proclaim the month of March, 1995, as PURCHASING MONTH, and call its significance to the attention of all citizens; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its special appreciation to the Roanoke County Procurement Department for its dedication to promoting ethics in public purchasing and saving tax dollars through economical buying. ~ 1 • I C -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION 31495-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MARGARET S. MOLES UPON BEING SELECTED VIRGINIA'S NATIONAL DISTINGUISHED PRINCIPAL WHEREAS, Margaret S. Moles, principal of Oak Grove Elementary School in Roanoke County, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal by the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals on March 7, 1995, in Williamsburg, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles was nominated by her school and Parent Teachers Association and was judged on interpersonal skills, resource management skills, and human resource development; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles has shown effective leadership and community involvement by being principal of and maintaining the high standards of a nationally recognized Blue Ribbon School, pioneering the School Renewal Project for the Southern Association of Colleges & Schools, and helping establish and being an active participant in the mentoring program for administrative interns through Virginia Tech; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles will represent Virginia this fall at the White House in Washington, D. C. where she will be recognized by the President of the United States. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby extends its congratulations to MARGARET S. MOLES upon being selected as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on behalf of its citizens, i the Board extends its deepest appreciation to Mrs. Moles for her dedication and outstanding services to the students of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: y-yL~.. _~ . ~..~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources _~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BIIPERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIEBDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLIITION OF CONGRATIILATIONS TO MARGARET 6. MOLES IIPON BEING SELECTED VIRGINIA'S NATIONAL DISTINGIIISHED PRINCIPAL WHEREAS, Margaret S. Moles, principal of Oak Grove Elementary School in Roanoke County, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal by the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals on March 7, 1995, in Williamsburg, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles was nominated by her school and Parent Teachers Association and was judged on interpersonal skills, resource management skills, and human resource development; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles has shown effective leadership and community involvement by being principal of and maintaining the high standards of a nationally recognized Blue Ribbon School, pioneering the School Renewal Project for the Southern Association of Colleges & Schools, and helping establish and being an active participant in the mentoring program for administrative interns through Virginia Tech; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles will represent Virginia this fall at the White House in Washington, D. C. where she will be recognized by the President of the United States. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby extends its congratulations to MARGARET S. MOLES upon being selected as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal; and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that on behalf of its citizens, the Board extends its deepest appreciation to Mrs. Moles for her dedication and outstanding services to the students of Roanoke County. " r ~-~ The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 14th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLIITION 31495-2 ADOPTING PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE PROJECTS FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1995-2001 plan; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following is a list of the recommended Primary and Interstate Projects for inclusion by the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Improvement Program for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year: 1. Route I-81 - increase the number of north and southbound travel lanes, improvement of all interchanges and consider the construction of an additional interchange between Wildwood Road (Route 619) and the interchange at Dixie Caverns (Route 460). 2. Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) - continuation of improvements to Route 221 from Crystal Creek Road to Route 752 (Old Mill Road) for a distance of approximately 2.3 miles. 3. Route 115 (Plantation Road) - continuation of improvements south to the Roanoke City Limits to the four lane section of Plantation Road or, in the alternative, consideration of the construction of a segment between the Roanoke City Limits and t Hershberger Road. 4. Route 11 (Williamson Road) - the widening of Route 11 from the Roanoke City Corporate limits north to Route 117 to include improvements to the existing bridge structure over Carvins Creek and the realignment of Florist Road to Route 11. 5. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) - continuation of the four laning of Route 11 to the existing four lane section of Route 647 (Dow Hollow Road). 6. Route 220 South (Franklin Road) - We are also pleased that money has been allocated to prepare a feasibility study to improve the existing corridor from Roanoke to Martinsville. 7. Interstate 73 - Roanoke County would like to express our support for this project through the Roanoke Valley. We ask that funds be allocated to continue the study. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~/• Q~-~-~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE• AGENDA ITEM• March 14, 1995 Adopt a list of the Primary and Interstate Projects for the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Improvement Program. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• County staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors adopt a list of Interstate and Primary Projects to present to the Virginia Department of Transportation Board Pre-allocation Hearing for Fiscal Year 1995-96, on March 22, 1995, in the Salem District Office Auditorium. BACKGROUND The Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1995-2001 plan. This program is updated annually. As a part of the development of this program, the Transportation Board conducts a public hearing in each of the nine construction districts in the state to receive input from members of the General Assembly, members of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, City Council members and other public officials. Roanoke County is within the Salem District along with eleven (11) other counties and ten (10) urbanized areas all lobbying for these funds. These Federal and State funds are allocated according to formulae as mandated by State Statute for Interstate, Primary and Urban Roads. The Salem District's Interstate, Primary and Urban funds for FY 95-96 is estimated to be $54,324,000. . ~ '°~ proposed widening of Route 11 from Route 115 to Hollins College and have a major positive impact on the North County area. 3. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) - With the widening of West Main Street to four lanes within the City of Salem, there is a need to continue the four-lanes of Route 11 to the existing four lane section at Route 647 (Dow Hollow Road. These improvements are needed to provide uniformity of road section, to address the continued safety and traffic congestion concerns along the road, and to provide a safer roadway for the commercial development of Valley Tech Park within this area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the recommended list by resolution. SU ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~ ~,,~~~, ~/--'r~"' ~' nold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe tions County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 4 ~!~ The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 14th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLIITION ADOPTING A LIST OF PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE PROJECTS FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIB YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1995-2001 plan; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following is a list of the recommended Primary and Interstate Projects for inclusion by the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Improvement Program for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year: 1. Route I-81 - increase the number of north and southbound travel lanes, improvement of all interchanges and consider the construction of an additional interchange between Wildwood Road (Route 619) and the interchange at Dixie Caverns (Route 460). 2. Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) - continuation of improvements to Route 221 from Crystal Creek Road to Route 752 (Old Mill Road) for a distance of approximately 2.3 miles. 3. Route 115 (Plantation Road) - continuation of improvements south to the Roanoke City Limits to the four lane section of Plantation Road or, in the alternative, consideration of the construction of a segment between the Roanoke City Limits and Hershberger Road. ~ ~",~ 4. Route 11 (Williamson Road) - the widening of Route 11 from the Roanoke City Corporate limits north to Route 117 to include improvements to the existing bridge structure over Carvins Creek and the realignment of Florist Road to Route 11. 5. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) - continuation of the four laving of Route 11 to the existing four lane section of Route 647 (Dow Hollow Road). 6. Route 220 South (Franklin Road) - We are also pleased that money has been allocated to prepare a feasibility study to improve the existing corridor from Roanoke to Martinsville. 7. Interstate 73 - Roanoke County would like to express our support for this project through the Roanoke Valley. We ask that funds be allocated to continue the study. Recorded Vote Moved By: _ Seconded By: Yeas: A Copy Teste: Nays: Mary Allen, Board Clerk A-31495-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. E--Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Inmate Medical Co-Payment Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~~~Naf~„~t~_( ~' 'l ~ BACKGROUND: As a result of the Department of Corrections refusing to provide medical, dental, and eye care for inmates housed in local jails, the Roanoke County-Salem Jail has experienced an increase from $5,000 to $60,000 per year for hospitalization coverage and from $2, 000 to $20, 000 per year for prescription drugs for inmates. In an effort to reduce the financial burden for Roanoke County taxpayers and the workload for the Roanoke County- Salem Jail Medical Department, an Inmate Medical Co-Payment Program was developed over the past year and implemented February 1, 1995. After one month's experience with the new program, the number of requests for medical care was 2,001 for February, 1995, as compared to 5,761 for January, 1995. There were 19 inmates seen by a physician in February, as compared to 43 in January. A medical co- payment is based on the inmate's financial ability to pay a portion of his/her medical care while incarcerated at the Roanoke County- Salem Jail. The program is authorized under Section 53.1-133.1 of the Code of Virginia and has been approved by the County Attorney's Office. This Inmate Medical Co-Payment Program will serve to deter those citizens who would seek free medical care through criminal activity at Roanoke County's expense. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: I request that the Board of Supervisors appropriate the fees collected from inmates for medical care and direct the Roanoke County Department of Finance to credit the Jail Medical Account an amount equal to that collected each month. FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: Place fees collected into the Roanoke County General Fund and increase the target budget for medical care for Roanoke County-Salem prisoners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Respectfull submitted, ~..~ , , Gerald S. Holt Sheriff Appro, ed by, , !~ ~ ~,~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ~" Approved (x) ----------------------- ACTION Motion by: Motion by Lee B ------------- VOTE ------- Denied ( ) Eddv to approve transfer of No Eddy Yes Abs x Received ( ) funds with resolution brought Johnson x Referred ( ) back to 3/28 meeting outlining Kohinke x To ( ) action Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 1994 SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -CHAPTER ~w" "~` ,1n : lct to ur,rend the Code o% Vire inia b~• addin„ u .vection ,rrrnrbercd ;i.?. !-1.1.?. 1. relotin~ to „rcdicra trc•utnrc•nt pro~ru,u for prrso-rcrs. (S 527 ,approved Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding a section numbered 53.1-133.1 as follows: ,¢' X3.1-13.1. :Llo-dical treat,nent for prisoners. .ln~• .sJrcriff or srrperinte,rdent ,na~• eslablr'sh a ,nedicul t: eat,nent pro~ra,n for prisoners in i+•iricir prisoners participate and pest' to~~'ards a portion ~~ the co.st.s thereof. The Board of Correctio,r.s .sires!! deL•elop a model plan and pro,nrrloate re~rrlations for ,such pro~ra,n. and .shall proti•ide cssrstance. if requested. to the sre,jf or .superintendent in the inrplc~,nenta[ion of a pro~ra,n. ~. _~ A-31495-4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~--- '~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Participate in a Water Line Extension on Loch Haven Road to Serve the Honeycutt Veterinarian Clinic COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• Mr. Adam Honeycutt has submitted plans to construct a veterinarian clinic on Loch Haven Road (Tax Parcels 36.01-01-12.1, 13.1). In order to serve this development with public water a 750-foot extension would be required from the existing 16-inch water line located at Louise Wells Drive (see attached sketch). Because the existing water line is greater than 300 feet from the property, the owner has the option to either install a well or extend the water line. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Because this is a commercial development, the owner would need to extend a minimum 12-inch water line at an estimated cost of $18,750. The portion of this line in excess of 300 feet would be subject to possible credits from his proposed off-site facility fee of $6,554.00 The owner has stated a desire for public water; however, if the costs exceed approximately $14,000, they will be forced to drill a well. The line extension in question is part of the future North Transmission line that will extend along Loch Haven Road. The County plans for this line to be 16-inch in diameter. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance Authorizing Monthly Billing of Utility Customers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1994, the Board of Supervisors approved the plans for monthly billing of utility customers. The Utility Billing Procedures Team has developed a revised Water and Sewer Ordinance authorizing the County to issue monthly utility bills. If approved, the ordinance would be effective July 1, 1995. Ordinance Detail: Beginning July 1, 1995, Roanoke County Water and Sewer residential customers would receive monthly utility bills. (Commercial customers currently are billed on a monthly basis.) The meters would continue to be read on a quarterly basis. The first and second bills during the quarterly cycle would be based on the previous quarter's actual reading. The third bill in the cycle would be based on the actual water usage adjusted for payments received for months one and two. (See Exhibit A for an illustration.) The revised Ordinance authorizes penalties to be applied to the unpaid monthly amounts. Cutoffs would only be done on delinquent bills after an actual reading of a customer's meter. Implementation: The team recommends starting phase in of the system in July 1995. All customers would receive a bill the beginning of July. One third of the customers would receive an actual bill for meters read in June 1995 and two thirds of the customers would receive an estimate of one month's usage. In August 1995, one third of the customers would receive a bill based on an the actual reading, adjusted for one month's estimate paid in July 1995. Two thirds of the customers will receive bills for one month's estimated usage. Finally in September, one third of the customers will receive bills for actual usage adjusted for two previous payments for estimated usage, and two thirds of the customers will receive bills for estimated usage. Beginning in October 1995, the new system will be fully phased in. Due Dates, Penalties and Cutoffs: The ordinance amends the due date for payment of outstanding bills. The due date will be moved to the 20th of the month following the bill date. Currently bills are due at the end of the month. The extra days will allow for processing of bills that are delayed by the mail or delay in processing by banks, etc. The penalty will be applied at the end of each month following the 20th and will be reflected on the bills mailed the beginning of the following month. This m:\finance\common\board\03-14-95.wpd March 8, 1995 i~_ will eliminate the need for a separate penalty notice and save forms and postage cost. Penalties will be applied to monthly amounts, but cutoffs will only be done after actual readings. The delinquent customer would be subject to cutoff within 15 days of the mailing of the bill that includes the penalty on the actual reading. This would further protect the County against bad debts by moving the cutoffs up approximately 30 days. Delinquent customers currently have approximately 75 days from the original bill date. The amended ordinance will cut the time to approximately 45 days from the bill date. Public Information: The staff will mail an informational fact sheet explaining the new policy to each utility customer beginning with the April 1995 cycle of bills. This will continue through June 1995, at which point each customer will have received a notice. In addition, the March edition of Roanoke County Today will feature utilities and include information on the billing change. FISCAL IMPACT: Phase I (Monthly Billing) Current Year Costs: Public Information Costs $ 5,000 FY 1995-96 Costs: Increased Postage $ 48,000 Increased Forms 9,000 Interest Income (30,000) $ 32,000 The $5,000 for public information should be appropriated from the FY 1994-95 Utility Funds Unappropriated Balance. The other costs will be included in the FY 1995-96 Utility Budget request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the first reading of the ordinance, the implementation plan, and the $5,000 appropriation from the Utility Funds Unappropriated Balance. A public hearing and second reading are scheduled for March 28, 1995. Res ctfully submitted, Gc. ~~ Paul rice Assistant Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator m:\finance\common\board\03-14-95.wpd March 8, 1995 ~_ i ACTION ___ VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To O Minnix _ _ Nickens m:\finance\common\board\03-14-95.wpd March 8, 1995 t ' '• Illustration of Monthly Billing Assumptions: Customer Actual Usage Bill June 1995 $90 Actual Usage Quarterly Reading September 1995 $80 ~i-r Exhibit A July 1995 Monthly Bill $30 (1/3 of $90) August 1995 Monthly Bill $30 (1/3 of $90) September Monthly Bill $20 ($80 - $30 - $30) The September bill is the settle up bill for the quarter. m:\finance\common\boazd\3-14-95.a March 7, 1995 ~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES", SECTION 22-83, "INSPECTION AND READING OF METERS; BILLS; REFUNDS", SECTION 22-86.1, "UNPAID BILLS", AND SECTION 22-86.2, "LIEN FOR WATER AND SEWER CHARGES", OF CHAPTER 22 "WATER", ARTICLE II. "WATER SYSTEMS", DIVISION 2. "COUNTY WATER SYSTEM", OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR MONTHLY BILLING OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONS UPON THE PLACEMENT OF LIENS ON RESIDENTIAL RENTAL REAL ESTATE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that, in order to better serve utility customers in the County, it is in the best interests of the public to provide for monthly billing of water and sewer services; and, WHEREAS, the 1994 Session of the General Assembly has adopted an amendment to §15.1-295, providing for water and sewer liens on real estate, which necessitates a corresponding amendment to Roanoke County Code §22-86.2; and, WHEREAS, the provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to the authority found in §§ 32.1-167, et sect., and Chapter 9, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). WHEREAS, legal notice of these amendments has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on March 14, 1995, and March 21, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: N-i 1. That Division 2. County Water System of Article II. Water Systems, Chapter 22 WATER, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 22-82. Rates and fees. (c) Security Deposits. (2) If any utility customer at any time fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in disconnection or discontinuance of service, that customer shall pay an additional deposit as security for future bill payments. This deposit shall be required in addition to full payment of the outstanding utility service bill, including late payment penalties and any applicable charges imposed pursuant to Section 22-82(7), and shall be paid prior to reconnection of service at the same location or initiation of service at any other location in the County of Roanoke. a. Residential. The security deposit for a residential customer of water, water and sewer, and sewer only services, shall be in an amount ec~ual..to the customer's last R~~~-t~r_1- ~t?~sf~4~'~< billing:, rounded to the nearest ~ Orie ~~~ `I~o~~lar (3) If any utility customer fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in a subsequent disconnection or discontinuance of service at any time, that customer shall pay additional security deposits, as required in subsection (c)(2) above, as follows: a. Residential. In the event that non-payment results in a second disconnection or discontinuance of service, a residential utility customer shall pay an additional security deposit in an amount equal to the customer's last s~~_}_-'_l `?7~3'f~?`i billing;, rounded to the nearest~~~~~~brie llollar ($1.00). Thereafter, no further deposits shall be required, except to the extent necessary to maintain or restore the deposit balance as hereinafter provided in subsection (c)(4). 2 ~-~ Sec. 22-83. Inspection and reading of meters; bills; refunds. The director shall cause all utility service meters to be inspected and read at least once every three (3) months for residential customers and at least once every month for commercial customers. The director shall have the authority to estimate usage if he determines that a meter reading ;~~f cannot be obtained. ~'' Utility service bills shall be paid at the utility billing office or at such other places designated by the director. All deposits or advance payments for water, refunds to depositors of advance payments, or other refunds on account of errors shall be made at the utility billing office. ~~~s n~~t~~-t-her-t-h~~a-srt ~-e~ .. .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ - i ,., a :iicrt-rccr (Code 1971, § 20.1-28) Sec. 22-86.1 Unpaid bills. ',~~? Any utility services bill which has not been paid by the due date of the bill, resulting in a past due balance, shall be subject to a late payment penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount o f the b i 11,-~~~i~--and-e~=end-~e~l-es~s t~i~r~~e~a }. The late payment penalty shall be added to the past due ti., .. ,., , .........:.:.... balance n~~a=~er-~~ the ~h ~~~'<~~~~ri~~ day of the month following the date that said bill was ~ d. ............ b>~:: ~h~.;: CQUnt. `~h~ll°:>::>b~:;;;.:~a,~tzcaa:~:~~;::::;.: ~g=<:d;~.s~c~'~ne~>:::.:<u::::: ~~~vice:~ ~~f the utility customer fails to make full payment o ~e past due balances and the aforesaid penalt~~~~~_ be~''ore 1~~ fifteenth (15t1'~) days of the ma~~i~i~--e~ t-~~~: tee::>::>::.r~z~~~us:::>::. a~:::::~r:'..: ;:::>:>.: :<.:::::.:..• a ;:.:;..:>::>::>.;.:....;:.;:.:..:.:. ~s"~t:a;Il;~~'~>:, the late payment penalt~e;, the disconnection ee, e reconnection fee, the deposit (if applicable), and any other charges or fees shall be made prior to service being restored to the premises or initiated at any other location in the County of Roanoke. 3 .~_ i (Code 1971, § 20.1-31) Sec. 22-86.2 Lien for Water and Sewer Charges. Taxes or charges hereafter made, imposed or incurred for water or sewers or use thereof in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall be a lien on the real estate served b a such waterline or sewer~~> ~'~~~~~~<`~°~~'~~~'. Y .+... ~ ...........................r................................r. 2. That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective on and from July 1, 1995. 4 ~uii~ii~iiiitttttitiiititittsiiuiuiuiiiiiiiitiitiitittttiuiittttittiiiittititttttttitttitttttttttitttttttttttittittttttttitttt~ -~ - -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - ~ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - PUBLIC HEARING `ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - SUBJECT: t'~ ' 1 Vt/g~~P ~ ~ S e w ~ r ~ i L C~ivc~. _ -_ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = VVfIEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _ = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty o~the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ = _ c c - .. - NAME D i v ~~ 5~ c ~ v~ r y - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ADDRESS ~ ~ /~s~/ ~~ `,4 J~ ~ /~ , S, w _ _ P~oNE '17 y- ~. ~ yo fittittttitttttittttiitiititttitittttttitittttittttitttttttittttttttttitittitttitttttittittttttitttiitittitttitttttt - ittitiitittit~111 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / - ! °`'^ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND 12-52 PARKING ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GENERALLY TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ZONING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE UNLAWFUL PARKING OF VEHICLES BY THE ISSUANCE OF PARKING TICKETS FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT~S~: Ly'r''~ G~~K'~r~'rLr °~ BACKGROUND' The overnight parking of trucks or commercial vehicles having more than two rear wheels is prohibited in the AR district and all residential districts by the Zoning Ordinance. The same section requires that recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers be parked behind the front building lot line. The enforcement provisions of the Zoning Ordinance requires the Zoning Administrator to notify a property owner in writing of any violations of the ordinance and to give them up to 15 days to correct such violation. A second written notice is then required if there is no correction. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Police Department is often the agency contacted by residents who have complaints about trucks or vehicles parked in violation of the Zoning Ordinance. The Department has raised legitimate questions regarding the use of parking tickets or traffic summonses to cite such parking violations. Obviously, the mobility of trucks and other vehicles makes reliance on written notice from the Zoning Administrator of doubtful effectiveness in cases of repeated and deliberate violations. The proposed amendments to the County's parking ordinance would treat these parking violations in the same manner as other existing parking restrictions. The penalty of $15.00 for a violation is consistent with the majority of other parking offenses in the County code. FISCAL IMPACT' Any anticipated revenue increase from fines is expected to be minor. r' N~~- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The alternatives available to the Board are as follows: I. Adopt the proposed ordinance amendments and permit the Roanoke County Police Department to issue tickets for parking violations by trucks and other vehicles in residential and AR zoning districts. II. Do not adopt the proposed amendments and continue to provide for written warnings from the Zoning Administrator to all residents illegally parking trucks or vehicles prior to initiating further enforcement action. Respectfully submitted, Jo ph B.VObenshain S 'or Assistant County Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens µ-'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 12- 51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND 12-52 PARKING ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GENERALLY TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ZONING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE UNLAWFUL PARKING OF VEHICLES BY THE ISSUANCE OF PARKING TICKETS FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-91-2, prohibits the parking of certain trucks or commercial vehicles in AR and all Residential districts and requires the parking of all recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers behind the front building lot line, unless in a completely enclosed garage or building; and WHEREAS, the enforcement provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, contained in Sec. 30-21 were drafted with a focus upon violations concerning parcels of real estate. This section requires a fifteen (15) day written notice from the zoning administrator and an opportunity for the property owner to correct any violation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department is frequently contacted by neighbors who observe violations of the Zoning Ordinance involving trucks or other vehicles and the Department has raised questions regarding compliance with the notice requirements of this ordinance prior to issuance of any tickets or court summons; and ~~ ~ WHEREAS, the mobility of trucks and other vehicles makes it necessary to provide law enforcement officers with the ability to issue parking tickets for such zoning violations without the necessity of advance warning to the property owner; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading was held on March 28, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That Section 12-51. Penalties for Parking Violations and Section 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally of Article III. Parking of Chapter 12 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC of the Roanoke County Code be amended and re-enacted, as follows: Sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a traffic infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined according to the following schedule: ::e:::>>::re~~~~:~:~4xr~, ~:~:?~ °: :: ' .. ' ::.: i; :.... ;.:::i::. ; ::.::..:;:7:;:; ::.::. ~.<:::ii. ~ : ' .: ~: 2; '' ':~ :< :::::::.::.:.:::::i::. ~::% ::, .. ;:::: '.::::` :` :.: `':~~:#::::. '. ':.::::::~1: :/:n.::;::2.:2i~7i:'f{`i::':N:~iG..... ... . !~ ++~y'iisfi::::::::Yi:::::i::~:::Y:::V:~~ ~~~.:::.~..'~,s,.,~ri,.:.»>~;ira~,.,.d.;~. .ss»~~:~.~~!~.4!:.:::: ~.~.::: ~,.~.~~~~~.~,1;A.:::~~.:::.f,~F,.:.fir,.?!Mt'~;ii>: :............................... ::.:::: .::::::::::::::::: Sec. 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally. <::1:: <:::>::>::N~:::>:~~ ~a:~:::>::cad:::>:~~at~~~:.::;~:.: .~.~ :..:........................................................................................... jri>v~c~~::~t:~:.c,~xa;.;:.;~~.;:.;:~~c::.»»>:~:t~::.;:.:~::1:~2::::~:::~;;::>~~::;::~~~»::;~:c~n:~.:.. >:<:;~-rd~.:n:~xzx~~:+:: ::::.~.:::: ~.:::::::::.:~ ::...:...........:..:::::::::::::::::::: 9:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. >:.»>'~>:::i::::::.>:::i::i::i: ^:i::i::i::>::i::::'::;i:riiiii:;:iiiiii::i::i`~:: ~::::::::~::::~.:: ~:::::::::::::::::i:~ >::>>:::: »><<; ;; ; ::; .:...: ;;::<::eh:~ie::;::::>:k~+~~~:>:::~~:«:~~:~::is~:~::.<:>:;~:~;:a::~~~:>:::~h~~::i::::::~e N~.:: ~~~r~~~.x.~~a~. .::...................................::.....:::.....::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.~.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::: .:....................................................................................................................................................................................................... . 2 :.i:.i:.::.:i.: is • :::::::: ...:: ~:::: :.:: .. ,n~[.';. ..:. :j•:::i ..':: '~ J.i~~a::::~~. ::::::::::::::::::::.::: ii?i:4:4 :.i:.i'.iiiiii'v:.::~: iiiiiiii: 'v:' :i:1ii}iiiiii:::: ..::::::::::::..::.i:. ~~~~i:i:j::::+,~1:::i±t{L.y'5::: i::. '::} :.::.:::ii :::.~~:~]}iiii:: :~..^`:^`~11~::::~~~~~~.::. :~: iiiiii: :!!`:..::: ~::: '::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.i'.i'4:~ii ii't.i ~::.iiiY.:::.y:::::: 4iii: <yi~.~''iiiY: :i •• .:::. . :.. y. ..4.:R~.+:...„...: ...~: 3xf.~:~. .n. :.i} iiii i.. ::ii:i{N~~~{[}::•::i: ~ iiiiii '. {iiiiii: . ' ~~•i :.: iiiiii: iii:::::::::::::: :v :::::::::. .:::::::::::::::::::: y.i:.iiiiiiiii: ii: iiiii iiiiii:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::.:: ..................... iX11"~~. .++~~~:,. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:ivi ......................... ................................... :: '::~.iiiii"+4'?: ~i'I~::iii".i:.i:.::. . i. is .:. .... :': .::.i:.i: ji. :. ., ... .: ., .. .. ":i::::: M,I~Y.M;,;W;~~.?W,.~~::.::. ...............................::::::::::::::::: :v: :.::.:~::::.~.:~::. : ii:: <::.ii:~i .i'.iii?iii`}}:;.;.:::,:+~.,.~ ::._ .._i .~,i .:: ,i'::L?::.:::..i' : :. '.'.iiyy.}:fi:.ii.`~~`jjlli~. . 4ii:i. :'2. Y,/~.~~jj.+i,,~}}~.~iiyiy._ .,:.~.7v, . .. ::::: ... .: ~:JF:•: :ii:iNhii iiiTYAi!iF:mil ~:iii:~~.:i:i::~:~:: ::::::::.:~:: :::v::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~:::::.:~:::::::: v:.: ~. ~::.: ~:::::::::: :.::::::::::::..:: :; iiiiii};:.:iii'.i::i::.iii'.:iiiiiiiii}}':.iiiiy:.i"vii:'i?ii iii'i/y ':: '<::: ~iiiiiiiii .'.:.'•ii:.: :::::.. }: :i is ii. iiiiii.. .: :iii:. ....:: ".::.? ::::!y~'yam/:1'i'?i::i:i::i: ': 1M:.~y.~y:i •{I~R.. .::: ~:: ':: :::: '::i::iiiri.~:.I~^:i:'::::i: ':.: :'p::i: :i::illl. M.aY,.~::;:.i::•iJ~.~.iii:AR.~.ii::~:. ::~.~:::.~.,Y.~,:.!^.:.iii~;W,..ii v:.::.::.::::: iiiiii: ::v ::::::::::::.: .::::::: :.:::: ~.:::: ~v:::::. ~:::v:.::::::::::::::::::: :':: ;:i ::;:;iiiiii l:i:}:i 4:; :: .. :., '. :i:i ~~:s:s. i:i~.: ~:::::::: :::::: :•::::::::::::::::: ~{~ An emergency vehicle or any personal vehicle operated by a law enforcement officer, firefighter, emergency medical services officer or county volunteer firefighter or rescue squad member responding to an emergency or a legitimate public safety need shall not be considered in violation of this section. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption. IJr~ 3 i° 4 _.~.. ~ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 ORDINANCE 31495-5 AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE FIFTH DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM FOR USE OF COUNTY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3330 VALLEY FORGE AVENUE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, authorized the execution of an agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for the use of surplus County real state located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue on May 11, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium has requested an extension of this agreement for the use of this property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of an ordinance extending this use of County property was held on February 28, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on March 14, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That it is in the County's best interests to extend the agreement for the use of this property located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue by the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for an additional fifteen (15) month period to August 31, 1996 upon the same terms and conditions to assist the Consortium in the adminis- tration of a grant to provide employment counseling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as 1 are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development D. Keith Cook, Member, FDETC Policy Board 2 Item No . -~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Extension of Agreement with Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~~~~nry=~( °~,/~ BACRGROIIND: The Board of Supervisors entered into an agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium (FDETC) on June 1, 1993, for the use of County property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue, previously used as the County's Voter Registration Office, as a Community Resource Center. The Consortium had received a grant from the United States Department of Labor to provide employment counseling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. The grant and agreement will expire on May 31, 1995. The FDETC is eligible for discretionary funding from the Department of Labor to develop a "one stop career center" which will continue employment services for dislocated workers. They are requesting continued use of the County property for a fifteen-month period beginning June 1, 1995. Staff is not aware of any proposed County use for the 1,000 square foot building during this time period. The staff recommends authorization by the County Administrator to amend the existing agreement and extend the FDETC use of the property for an additional fifteen (15) months. FISCAL IMPACT: The County's provision of electric services totaled $1,740 and $443 for water/sewer service for the period July 1993-January 1995. ~~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By this second reading, staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors allow the FDETC to continue to use the property at 3 3 3 0 Valley Forge Avenue as a "one stop career center" for a fifteen- month period. The County Administrator should be authorized, upon approval of this second reading of the ordinance, to execute an amended agreement on a form approved by the County Attorney. Respectfully submitted: ~`,% D. Keith Cook, Member FDETC Policy Board Timothy W. Gubala, Director Economic Development Department ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ,~'-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EBTENSION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE FIFTH DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM FOR USE OF COIINTY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3330 VALLEY FORGE AVENUE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, authorized the execution of an agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for the use of surplus County real state located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue on May 11, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium has requested an extension of this agreement for the use of this property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of an ordinance extending this use of County property was held on February 28, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on March 14, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That it is in the County's best interests to extend the agreement for the use of this property located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue by the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for an additional fifteen (15) month period to August 31, 1996 upon the same terms and conditions to assist the Consortium in the adminis- tration of a grant to provide employment counseling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as 1 ,.~'--/ are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. agenda.realest.5thpdc 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Industrial Development Authority Four-year unexpired term of Wayne Dunman who has resigned (Please see attached letter). His term will expire September 26, 1995. The Catawba Magisterial District is not currently represented on the IDA. At the February 28, 1995 Board Meeting, Supervisor Kohinke advised that he expects to appoint a citizen from the Catawba District at this meeting. SUBMITTED BY: ~ic.~- ~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ;~ !~ i - *~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION 31495-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 14, 1995, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - February 14, 1995, February 28, 1995. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., Upon His Appointment to the State Supreme Court. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Plantation Grove Subdivision. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards, Section 8. 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections February 14, 1995 -~ ~~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 14, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1994. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Branan G. ~~ = February 14, 1995 ~ (~ ~ I have the resolutions personally presented by him to the employees at a time convenient to them. 2. Presentation from the Southwestern yirginia Second Harvest Food Bank. Chairman Minnix accepted the award from Pamela Irvine, Director, Southwestern Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank. Ms. Irvine expressed appreciation to the Board of Supervisors for allowing the food bank to use space at the Public Service Center donated by Roanoke County following their fire in December 1989. IN RE: BRIEFINGS 1. Quarterly Update on Sprint Hollow Water Project Gar Robertson, Utility Director) Gary Robertson and John Bradshaw, Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, made presentations to the Board. Mr. Robertson reported on the Water Treatment Plant, advising that two of the three 2-million gallon concrete tanks are complete, site grading is 95~ complete, and raw and finished water lines between the reservoir and plant are complete. He also reported on the status of the Glenvar Pump Station, the South Transmission Lines, and advised that staff will be meeting with local civic groups in March/April to discuss alternate routes for the North Transmission Line. The cost will be - _ February 14, 1995 ~ n7 Spring Hollow Reservoir is a good, stable, sound project for the Valley. Mr. Robertson advised that the additional grouting is estimated to cost $50,000. Following the test, staff will determine whether to recommend additional grouting. IN RE: NEW BIISINESS 1. Request for ADOroval of Amendment to Integrated Automated- Librarv Svstem Contract to Allow Botetourt County to Join the Svstem. (SOencer Watts, Library Director) A-21495-1 Mr. Watts advised that in 1990, Roanoke County entered into a contract with the cities of Salem and Roanoke to establish and maintain a joint automated library system. Botetourt County was invited to join at that time but was unable to do so. On May 12, 1994, Botetourt County formally applied for membership as a full partner. Based on terms outlined by the Roanoke Area Libraries (RAL) Committee, an amendment to the original contract has been drafted. Mr. Watts reported that Botetourt's participation in RAL will reduce shared operational costs and central site capital costs for the original partners with Roanoke's net savings approximately $4,500 for next year. In response to a question, Mr. Watts advised that Botetourt County did not have to share in the original cost February 14, 1995 ~ n(~ Health District and the City of Roanoke be invited to participate. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 21495-2 SIIPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGIONAL COMMISSION ON ORGAN AND TISSIIE DONATION AND TRANSPLANTATION WHEREAS, almost 38,000 people in the United States are currently on a waiting list to receive Organ and Tissue donations and transplantations; and WHEREAS, statistics received from the United Network for Organ Sharing, UNOS, indicate there were 40,147 donors, which resulted in 92,619 transplanted organs in the United States in the past five years; and WHEREAS, the number of patients on the waiting list for organ transplants increased 108 and the median waiting time increased for most patients, and the total deaths for persons on the solid organ transplant waiting list increased 98$ from 1988 - 1993; and WHEREAS, these statistics clearly establish a dramatic need for increased awareness, coordination and education to stimulate action on Organ and Tissue donations, and knowledge of transplantations before the situation becomes even more critical; and a February 14, 1995 ~ 11 Credit of the Off-Site Sewer Fees for the Beasley North Property. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) A-21495-3 Mr. Robertson advised that Boone, Boone and Loeb, Inc. has submitted a preliminary plan for 201 residential lots adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway near Cotton Hill Road. The development requires that a sewer pump station be constructed in order to provide public sewer and construction costs are estimated at $80,000. Under County policy, the pump station would be eligible for credits of up to one-half of the off-site fees which will be $100,500. The developer has asked for credit of $50,250. Discussion followed on whether this should be tied to Boone getting a permit from the Blue Ridge Parkway to put a sewer pipe under the parkway and whether it could be used to determine development along the parkway. Supervisor Nickens advised a recent three-day meeting with parkway officials, developers and County staff resolved some of the issues regarding development which would still protect the parkway. Following discussion, Supervisor Johnson called for the question. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the request February 14, 1995 ~' 2. Ordinance Conveying a 15 Foot-wide Permanent Drainage Easement to the Commonwealth of Vircinia at the New Forensic Laboratory. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) Mr. Chambliss advised that this easement will convey the water from the joint-use parking lot at the Forensic Laboratory to the retention facility being constructed by the Commonwealth and should help flooding problems at the Public Safety Center and Northside Schools. Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for February 28, 1995. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing Conveyance of Certain Parcels of Real Estate Located in the city of Salem (Tax Man Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146 9 7) and Rnown as the Old County School Board Offices and Annex Located at 510 and 526 College Avenue, Salem, VA. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) There were no citizens requesting to speak on this item, and action was deferred until after the Executive Session. February 14, 1995 ~ 1 Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - January 9, 1995, January 10, 1995, January 20-21, 1995, January 24, 1995. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and the Southwest Development Financing, Inc. 3. Resolution Appropriating $2,000 to the School Operating Fund for Roanoke Regional Student Assistance Program Network Training. 4. Resolution Opposing Federal and State Cuts to TAP and the Federal Community Services Block Grant Program. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit and 50/50 Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 for the Women of the Moose, Vinton #1551. 6. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA. 7. Request for the Establishment of Cash Funds for the Parks and Recreation Department. 8. Donation of a Drainage Easement on Lot 29, Section 1, Summerfield from David B. Taylor and Kari M. Taylor to Roanoke County. 9. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Glen Cove Elementary School PTA. 10. Resolutions of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of the Following Roanoke County Employees: a. Richard Francisco b. Charles Kane c. Fannie Sifers d. Frederica Thurston 11. Resolution Amending 11095-8 Approving the Submission of Three ISTEA Transportation Enhancement Program Applications. February 14, 1995 ~ ~ federal funding and $136,846 in state funding which would have a severe impact on their ability to continue to help low-income residents move towards self-sufficiency. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, strongly supports federal and state funding of Total Action Against Poverty; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors urges our state and federal officials to continue the Federal Community Services Block Grant Program and the State Community Services Block Grant Program. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 21495-4.i OF APPRECIATION IIPON THE RETIREMENT OF RICHARD L. FRANCISCO, GENERAL SERVICES, SOLID WASTE DIVISION WHEREAS, Richard L. Francisco was first employed in July, 1964, as a Motor Equipment Operator I in the Solid Waste Division of the General Services Department; and also served as a Refuse Collector in the Solid Waste Division; and WHEREAS, Mr. Francisco exhibited his commitment to serving the citizens of Roanoke County by his excellent attendance record during his 30 years of employment, and his willingness to volunteer for extra duty during the floods of February 14, 1995 1 1 (~ ~- Services Division in January, 1984; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Kane has been an outstanding ball player for the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office softball teams in the Emergency Services League since its inception; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Kane will become a member of the Quarter Century Club of Roanoke County, having served the County for over 25 years; and WHEREAS, Sergeant Kane, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to CHARLES P. KANE for over 25 years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 21495-4.k OF APPRECIATION IIPON THE RETIREMENT OF FANNIE B. SIFERS, SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHEREAS, Fannie B. Sifers was first employed part time as a School Crossing Guard in August, 1968, and employed full - February 14, 1995 ~ '~ ~ August, 1990, as a Group Home Counselor I at Youth Haven II; and WHEREAS, Ms. Thurston, while employed at Youth Haven II, has provided dedicated and capable assistance to the group home residents and other staff; and WHEREAS, Ms. Thurston, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to FREDERICA M. THURSTON for over 4 years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 21495-4.m AMENDING RESOLIITION 11095-8 APPROVING THE SIIBMISSION OF THREE ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Resolution 11095-8 on January 10, 1995, and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to amend this resolution to clarify its obligation with respect to certain projects; and February 14, 1995 ~ 7 ~ Roanoke, Virginia subsequently elects to cancel any of these projects, the County of Roanoke, Virginia hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation for the Hanainq Rock Rails to Trails Pro-iect the "Virginia Civil War Trails" Hanaina Rock Site and the Garst Mill Park and Trail Project On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Kohinke• (1) He asked about a ground breaking ceremony for the new police firing range. Mr. Hodge responded that staff will plan one. (2) He advised that any proposed date is agreeable with him for the joint meeting with the Vinton Town Council. (3) He asked whether the Parks and Recreation CIP fund applied to school playgrounds. Pete Haislip advised affirmatively, and reported that the program will be ongoing with February 28, 1995 the deadline for this year. (4) He attended the Economic Development Partnership breakfast, and went to Richmond to attend legislative Day at the General Assembly on February 9 and the Chairman's Institute on February 10. - February 14, 1995 I - ~~~ Supervisor Johnson• (1) He asked Mr. Hodge for an update on the energy improvements at Burlington Elementary School. (2) He attended the Employee Advisory Committee luncheon where employees asked for support from the Board for longevity raises. (3) He asked staff to finalize information regarding costs for the new Cave Spring High School to determine when to go forward with plans. Supervisor Minnix• (1) He is submitting the names of Don Witt, Charles Blankenship and Richard Kelly to Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Fifth Planning District Commission, to serve on the Open Space Steering Committee. (2) He reported that he, Mr. Hodge, and Supervisor Kohinke attended Legislative Day at the General Assembly, and that they met with representatives from Roanoke Valley who are aware of problems at the local level. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports after discussion of Items 4 and 5. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund Unapp ropriated Balance ?. Capital Fund Unapp ropriated Balance 3. Board Conting ency Fund 4. Quarterly Rep ort on Police Traffic Unit 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountabilit er February 14, 1995 ~ 27 to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (CONTINUED FROM AFTERNOON SE33ION) February 14, 1995 ' (~ 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on January 24, 1995; and a second reading was held on February 14, 1995 concerning the sale and disposition of a certain parcels of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the old County School Board Offices and Annex (Tax Map Nos. 146-9-5, 146-9-6, 146-9-7); and 3. That an offer having been received for said property, the offer of City of Salem to purchase this property for $600,000 is hereby accepted; and 4. That all net proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance accepting the offer from the City of Salem for $600,000, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: OTHER BIISINESS - February 28, 1995 ~ ~ ~ I Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 28, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1995. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens (ARRIVED 3:35 P.M.) MEMBERS ABBENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES = February 28, 1995 ~ 2 2 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution approving the 1995-96 Roanoke Regional Airport Budget. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens RESOLUTION 22895-1 APPROVING THE ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1995-1996, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 10, 1995, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1995-1996 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1995-1996 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 10, 1995, report of the Commission Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby Februa 28 1995 I NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 3. Request for Funding for Citizen Satisfaction Survey 1Anne Marie Green) A-22895-3 Ms. Green advised that at the Board Retreat in January, the Board directed staff to conduct a citizen satisfaction survey. The Center for Survey Research at Virginia Tech which conducted the recent telephone citizen survey on visioning for the Planning and Zoning Department is available to complete this survey. It will consist of contacting 500 people by telephone during either April or May, with the cost of the survey being $12,600. In response to Supervisor Kohinke, she advised that the last citizen survey was done in 1991, with 500 respondents and a 3o to 4%, error margin. She stated that staff has attempted to contact others such as Roanoke College about doing the survey but has been unsuccessful. She requested that $12,600 be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance for the citizen satisfaction survey. Supervisor Eddy inquired as to whether the survey would be done yearly and if the questions would be standard in an effort to gauge citizen improvement in services. Mr. Hodge stated that this was the intent and he would like to link it with employee evaluations. Supervisor Eddy felt that some of the questions on the visioning survey reflected bias and requested that the Board review the = Februa 28 1995 be appropriated in advance from the proceeds to cover the court costs and expenses. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the selection of the firm and that $3,000 of the proceeds be appropriated to the Treasurer's Office to pay for the contract. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: REQIIESTS FOR AORR SESSIONS At Supervisor Eddy's suggestion, Chairman Minnix asked that the Board Members indicate to Mr. Hodge if they would like to have a work session or receive more information on the proposal for transportation districts. IN RE: REQIIEST FOR PIIBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the first readings with the removal of Item 4 and to set the second readings and public hearings for March 28, 1995. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens = February 28, 1995 ~ Z n Allow Single Family Attached and Detached Dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Authorizing the Extension of Agreement with Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for use of County Prouerty at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. (Timothy W. Gubala, Economic Development Director) Mr. Gubala stated that the County entered into an agreement on June 1, 1993 with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium (FDETC) for use of County property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. The Consortium had received a grant from the U. S. Department of Labor to provide employment counselling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. The grant and agreement with the County will expire on May 31, 1995, and the FDETC is now requesting a fifteen-month extension. The FDETC is eligible for discretionary funding from the Department of Labor to develop a "one stop career center" which will continue employment services for the dislocated workers. Mr. Gubala advised that of the 231 persons served by the FDETC, 66 were from Roanoke County, and he is unaware of any proposed County use of this building. He recommended that the extension of the lease for the fifteen-month period be approved. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for March 14, 1995. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: = February 28, 1995 ~ ^ ~ I Whispering Pines Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3078, dated September 16, 1994; and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 14, 1995; and a second reading was held on February 28, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by•conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's Whispering Pines Park development. 3. That donation of a right-of-way for an overhead line(s) and related improvements across Whispering Pines Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3078, dated September 16, 1994, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to ~ - February 28, 1995 ~ ,~ Z I acquire from the County of Roanoke a permanent drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, through the County's property adjoining the site of the state Forensic Laboratory, on which an expanded parking facility is being constructed for use by the State, the County, and the general public; and, WHEREAS, the easement is required to direct the drainage and surface water from the forensic laboratory site, and from the joint parking lot on County property, to the retention facility being constructed by the Commonwealth; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easement will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 14, 1995; and a second reading was held on February 28, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interest in real estate to be conveyed is hereby declared to be surplus, and is hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for drainage purposes in connection with the construction of the forensic laboratory and parking facility. = February 28, 1995 ~ A ~ AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 22895-7 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 28, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans Advisory Council. 2. Resolution Removing Turkey Hollow Road and a Portion of Crossbow Circle from the List of County Road Projects. 3. Adoption of Reimbursement Resolution for $2,500,000 of Sewer Capital Improvement. 4. Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit for Calendar Year 1995 from the Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. 5. Resolution of Support of Continued Funding for the Appalachian Regional Commission. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. - February 28, 1995 ~ ,~ ~ WHEREAS, it is appropriate to remove these remaining two uncompleted 1985 road bond projects from the list of active County road projects. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1) That Turkey Hollow Road and a portion of Crossbow Circle be removed from the list of active County road projects. The County shall take no further action, nor expend public funds, to improve, construct or reconstruct these roads to current State standards, or to accept these roads, or any real estate interest therein, for purposes of facilitating the acceptance of these roads into the State system of secondary highways. 2) That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall send a certified copy of this Resolution to the Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation, Old Heritage Corporation, and the Hunting Hills Homeowners Association. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 22895-7.C OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISROB OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DECLARING .ITS INTENTION TO REIMBIIRBE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR SEWER BYBTEM IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia "County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance February 28, 1995 ~ 4 governments for improving the quality of life for residents of the Appalachian region of the United States; and WHEREAS, ARC programs focus directly on the most pressing problems facing Appalachian communities; and WHEREAS, over the last thirty years ARC has improved the quality of life of Appalachian residents by constructing more than 2,100 miles of highways; funding more than 400 clinics and hospitals to provide health care to 4 million people each year; funding more than 2,000 industrial water and sewer systems which create private sector jobs and have stimulated the region's economy; funding more than 700 vocational and technical schools providing needed skills to 500,000 people each year; and WHEREAS, the Fifth Planning District Commission has worked with the Appalachian Regional Commission for over two decades to enhance economic development, educational opportunities and community development; and WHEREAS, ARC has provided funding support for many important projects in the Fifth Planning District, such as the Covington Industrial Park, the Alleghany County Industrial Park, road access improvements to the CFW Communications Center in Clifton Forge, water system improvements along Route 11 in Botetourt County, funding to support the Pulp and Paper Technology Program at Dabney S. Lancaster Community College, special grants and funding for the Jackson River Vocational School and Botetourt County Vocational Center; and _ February 28, 1995 ~ C ~ Mr. Mahoney will check with John Willey and advise. (3) He received a memorandum from John Birckhead and stated that he was pleased that the staff has completed the appeals process. He advised that the Board of Equalization will begin work on March 6, 1995. (4) He recommended that the Supervisors read an article in the NACO newsletter, County News, entitled "Credibility Gap - A Crisis of Legitimacy". (5) He asked for the status of the legislation requiring that localities pay for health insurance for retired teachers, and asked staff for the cost to Roanoke County. Mr. Mahoney advised that he thought the legislation had not passed but was still in committee. Supervisor Eddy asked for a legislative update on this item and what the cost is to the County by March 10 since Governor Allen will be meeting with the legislators on March it concerning which legislation to veto. (6) He announced that there is a Regionalization Meeting set for March 9 at the Vinton War Memorial to receive the study from Towers Perrin. He asked if the Board should adjourn to this date. It was Board consensus that it was not necessary to adjourn to this meeting. Supervisor Johnson: (1) He asked for a Legislative Update on how the County fared this year. Mr. Hodge advised that a report will be made at the March 14, 1995 meeting. (2) He asked what impact the sinkhole on I-81 would have on the County, and asked if expenses such as overtime for police could be reimbursed. Supervisor Nickens: (1) He asked that the Legislative Update include information about the proposal for the bingo process to be removed from the local government and put before a special state _ _ February 28, 1995 ~ CZ I 3. Board Contincency Fund 4. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues as of January 31, 1995. 5. Bond Pro'ect Status Re ort IN RE: RECESS FOR MEDIA QIIESTION8 Chairman Minnix announced a recess at 4:15 p.m. There were no questions from the media. IN RE: EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS At 4:30 p.m., Chairman Minnix reconvened the meeting. Chairman Minnix and County Administrator Elmer Hodge presented certificates to all employees celebrating their 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 year anniversaries. IN RE: RECEPTION At 4:50 p.m., Chairman Minnix declared a recess for a reception honoring the employees who received service awards. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Bucket Work Session Chairman Minnix reconvened the work session at 5:15 p.m. Mr. Hodge and Brent Robertson, Budget Manager, presented information concerning: (1) Mid-Year Expenditures; (2) General Government Revenues, (3) Vehicle Inventory and Policy; and (4) Budget _ February 28, 1995 ~ ~ ~ Supervisor Kohinke moved to adopt the proclamation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to Receive Citizen Comments for Items to be Included in the Budcet for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year. Butch Kelly, 8564 Gravel Hill Road, President of the Roanoke County Education Association, asked that the Board put a higher priority on education for this budget by funding education at 57 per cent as was done in 1984, rather than the present 48 percent. He advised that Roanoke County is behind other localities in teacher salaries and below the state average for expenditures per pupil. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to Rezone 0.819 Acre from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Expand the Existinc Building, Located at 4347 Old Cave SDrinc Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, IIoon the Petition of Joseph A. Ouesenberr~ Lon Hartlev, Assistant Director of Planninc and Zonin 0-22895-8 Mr. Hartley advised that this is a request to remove the four proffers agreed to at the May, 1987 rezoning so that the _ _ February 28, 1995 ~ ~7 I I- WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 24, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing were held on February 28, 1995; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.819 acres (TAB MAP NO. 76.20-1-13) and located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Joseph A. Quesenberry. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the removal of the following conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1987, which the Board of Supervisors hereby removes as follows: 1) Property to be limited to swimming pool service and supplies and retail sales; 2) Storage trailer at rear of building will be screened from view by wooden fencing on three sides; 3) Parking of company vehicles will be at rear of property; 4) No outside storage of sales or swimming pool services and supply equipment will be permitted. s - February 28, 1995 ~ ~~ I Don Tingler, 1861 Pembrook Drive, Vinton advised that he was opposed to the petitioner closing Temple Drive at the intersection of Temple and Feather Road because of the increased traffic on Hardy Road and safety concerns with the sharp right hand turn. Mr. Wimmer indicated that he was willing to work with VDOT concerning the access concerns and would like to leave the option of closing Temple Drive open pending negotiations with VDOT. There was discussion concerning whether to eliminate the proffer stating that the property will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan dated December 21, 1994. Mr. Hartley and Mr. Mahoney advised that if VDOT required substantial changes to the project, it would be brought back to the Board for another hearing. Mr. Mahoney recommended that the proffer remain in the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens advised that he agrees with Supervisor Johnson that eastern Roanoke County needs this type of development and that the only concern is with the entrances. He advised that the County has historically relied on VDOT to determine the overall public interest and safety. In the event that VDOT should decide to close Temple Drive, action would also be required by the Board. He moved to adopt the ordinance and asked that staff continue to work with Mr. Wimmer, Mr. Tingler and others who might have an interest in this project. Nancy Ellis, owner of property adjacent to Mr. Tingler, asked for permission to speak. She asked who would be responsible for f a February 28, 1995 ~ ~ ~ 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.37 acres, as described herein, and located northwest of the intersection of Feather Road and Temple Drive, (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-26 and 71.07-1-27) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low-Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Medium-Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Wimmer Real Estate Network Inc. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan dated December 21, 1994. (2) Use of the property shall be restricted to the construction of not more than 41 townhome units and related site improvements associated with townhome development. (3) All townhomes will be one-story structures. (4) All improvements to common areas, e.g. driveways, access roads will be owned and operated by developer and/or the property owners' association. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Temple Drive (Va. Sec. Rte. 1030) and the southeast corner of property, now or formerly, of Donald M. Tingley and Nancy T. Ellis (WB 34, page 738 & DB 1394, page 1029) ; thence leaving Temple Drive and with the Tingley/Ellis line, N. 0 deg. 30' 00" W. 863.30 feet to an iron pin found on the southerly line of property of Thomas W. Callahan (DB 441, page 269); thence with the Callahan line, N. 80 deg. 57' 00" E. 91.83 feet to an iron pin February 28, 1995 ~ ~Z Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman ~/ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION 31495-6.a OF CONGRATULATIONS TO JUDGE LAWRENCE L. ROONTZ, JR. UPON HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT WHEREAS, the Honorable Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. has served as a member of the judiciary in the Roanoke Valley since 1967, when he was appointed to the Salem Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court; and WHEREAS, Judge Koontz was appointed in 1985 as one of the first members of the Virginia Court of Appeals, where he has served with distinction; and WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly has appointed Judge Koontz to the Virginia Supreme Court, where he will serve as the only Justice from Southwest Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, extends its deepest appreciation to LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. for his devotion and dedication to the judicial system in the Roanoke Valley; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors congratulates Judge Koontz on his new position as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: _J°d Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File r t ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Congratulations to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. Upon His Appointment to the Virginia Supreme Court COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Judge Lawrence Koontz was recently appointed to serve on the Virginia Supreme Court, the only Justice from Southwest Virginia. His appointment follows a long and distinguished career as a judge in the Roanoke Valley. It has been recommended that the Board of Supervisors recognize this achievement by a resolution of congratulations to Judge Koontz. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution by adopted by the Board of Supervisors and a framed copy by forwarded to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. ~- / ~~ , Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~y -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO JUDGE LAWRENCE L. ROONTZ, JR. UPON HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT WHEREAS, the Honorable Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. has served as a member of the judiciary in the Roanoke Valley since 1967, when he was appointed to the Salem Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court; and WHEREAS, Judge Koontz was appointed in 1985 as one of the first members of the Virginia Court of Appeals, where he has served with distinction; and WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly has appointed Judge Koontz to the Virginia Supreme Court, where he will serve as the only Justice from Southwest Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, extends its deepest appreciation to LAWRENCE L. ROONTZ, JR. for his devotion and dedication to the judicial system in the Roanoke Valley; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors congratulates Judge Koontz on his new position as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia. ,. ,' ACTION # A-31495-6.b ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Plantation Grove Subdivision ~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~'~ ,~,,,,,,,(~ ~~ v~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Plantation requested that Roanoke County and sanitary sewer facilities all necessary easements. Grove, Section 1, DVW, Inc., have accept the Deed conveying the water serving the subdivision along with The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lang Engineering entitled Plantation Grove, Section 1, dated October 28, 1994, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $74,400 and $121,800 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Plantation Grove, Section 1 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~. SUBMITTED BY: Gary R ertson, P.E. Utility irector APPROVED: ~'-3 ,/yytAl~ F~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections k-3 Form 6 THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 9th Februar ]995 day of Y' , by and between DVW, INC . hereinafter referred to as the "Developer", party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all the water and sewer lines, laterals, valves, fittings, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manhole and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility and/or water or sewer line Easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the Easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Plantation Grove - SECTION I dated October 28 , 19 94 , made by LANG ENGINEERING and on f i le with the Roanoke County Engineering and Inspections Department. 20 1~- 3 The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and sewer system including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the County and will perform any necessary repairs at it's cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia By Elmer C. Hodge Tit'- By: Tit Approved as to form: Assistant County Attorney 21 IC-3 ST~TE OF VIRGINIA: ~ OF `~-n0~ TO WIT The foregoing Deed was acknowled ed befog m'g this '~1 day of 19 ~"j by (,~ . ~aU,LCY. 'KtQQ .Q~ behalf of Notary Public My commission expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA: OF TO WIT: on The foregoing Deed was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by Elmer C. Hodge. County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 22 r ./ l:nl' (r f(nllf. IVf lls:? I'Ir -~....... a.... ' - `. /~' ~R,,.`~ / ~ ~~/ . ~7~i ,~. -~. -s~5~ ' ~ ~~ ~\ /~~ i~, i~ l~' ~ ... ~\l \ .. a ,`~\. i. I ,` . _ .._ 1 ROANOKE COUNTY LOCATION: ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FOR PLANTATION GROVE, SECTION 1 DEPARTMENT ;:,; . :, ~'~ _. A-31495-6.c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards, Section 8 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of The Orchards, Section 8, F & W Community Development Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC entitled The Orchards, Section 8, dated April 23, 1992, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $22,300 and $40,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~~~~ ~~~' Gary Rob tson, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections r I~'y Form 6 DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 22 day of February, 1995, by and between: F & W Community Development Corp hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled The Orchards - Sec 8 dated April 23, 1992 made by Lumsden Associates, PC and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 K-y The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: As: State of: County/Cy~; ThP fnrPRnl nn (~PPli Duly authorized on behalf of lT ~'l.V to wit: S arknnwl E?c1aPr7 hafnra ma thi c Notary Public My Commission expires : ~(~l~.L,1- 3 ~ , ~~~J~ Page 2 of 3 officer Title C PfYx. n'W,I,YL i 7~ ~ ~~ Q~~O I~Yxa~.~ C K-y Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney By Elmer C. Hodge State of: County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Revised 02/10/95 Page 3 of 3 ~~ NORTH rAA • a a-r-1 AIMArx.+y !le•urr IA f.YN LIVMYMIIr )fYt:O•M/vl LOII 0.4 •ft f6_ Ifl TOxEO JI'f J, _ (• L' S• / 1 11 r ' oeelrr or • I. , faf.K fl f ~ I !qr ~ 1w•r 4wveL •fwV n ` '` Is n . yti rro' G `V \ •1.1. rM1 w.M `I I~ ~. 1~ ~ S/xE0 R'4 N, .~" ` Ii ~A • 7y 4 ~. IZ ~H ~ } p N'I ~ /1'Lw/ . I .n ' F ' .. O I t .V r N r 1 ` _ Al tpMN ~ ~Y 'r~l 3 v: w, a•r q / ndofto a' 41•Lwc f{r{I. wnfll. MAVNO:t ~ j .' ~ : I: IS y /LG~ _: f•A M.•I tf i~ Oihf41 ~N TI.v ` K ~ li - ifrWbf t4• -t6 ' ` ~ _ _ f: t.nt AI•LK. At f7'tf wl f• uN LtA ° ' n•5s ff a < ; ` ~ • n . \~ A/ tr vAr'u5e A. E_ a .Mt/~` ~ ~ _ s:: : M% GC _ • ' .. N+EI. Nw.re.f: ;. .A+,. ' ~ : .' i , .M J - «:-r_~ . ._ B ~ , / , , ~ q•wt9 ,N,f.~J ..i ..0•!ff) .11Y NAffi r i•4a0w-/If ~ F ~ S.• . = ~ 11 ` M1f • AAMN • ~ ~ I {Orvfir:Oxl ro.rY fAN A ro AF wA)F !v IYnONi f1aT!r N".'h Y.•f ' s "~ t . 10 , CIDER 4:. K..•Af. ,° ,5 L ` ~ >e,ll•Mf+r W+-A.;•:f.: GE/N Grren •tu• a•e r5u1y p n.n M. a 1 !~ / ~ L1ruIY MA•!laf •1 A.A4 N ' t'!f-•f•Ief t __ ,~, •f 4Y ~ M• / '1 N r11 1! d fA !A'Mt fY{r rMf V NMf ••Ir n'a• 'frM w~rx Tirf1 N _« 1' N N• ~ ' ~ ~ - - ~ . ' rp , • oflr•HG NN •uLL •f K+ yu)f t~NM (.o r00. 00 M IT % jr r ~ g / // H/1/ xA•fA ww0.f fIMn NAN9fnp NAO ~ Irl x•?uxr AYENar 'fr AO.JxOM LO•+tr~ wff fl N.wrN ~ ~/ ~ ' GNGk MA?K: ' cfYMrrl 1= •fiA flr••n,ro 1 AI Gr+, A'A. it•N. 'N~"f• 1 // AI AOwN!Ap Er •:4 NT)AIxT Iw SpYINEAAr ~ n:xf Aa) tf•TI ft K i i li rlr AY N' M~N'A•Y'• b~ ~ •f . aupAlxr d loMf Awv vMrN T i ' ` f lafv • N4 i I+ ~ 1 ItAJtNi i~ 4 .' { )0J :i w•r!y Nf IIA. rrM IfNfi. i _ ON ' S 1: ~~ ~r ~ yfbn /ANTI l '. ~ J ~ f, K'w Aie.f Y NppO • t5 • f M • f fb I s ' y \ y; Ar -y 4w ~ 5' AI 1 ~ ~ 1 p { nN MMN G/ 9 1l T••f11 ! ~.~ 1~ NMx Ii 16 1 x V' pf YN A rb. JS k0 0. N f tf ~ J • ~ ~ . f0' a' ~ Nr MTf. ~ I •N. ff'Ar SN ~ y M•fi'tT'N, TI't I j 1 rf' IAV ilMt. ffN•I J ", f ,i ~--YIT•:T'~1'w. '• q~ - - 0 + 3 ~ 4r t•, N.A. Q 3 I VI l' ~ "- - __.-._--_ __ ___ I CENTERLINE CURVE D.?A ---~__ O r fr 1 ~':t- _ - .,: E r.viJ:s __r~Ay 1~--r:,:: x0-_o IL erAAt~G a•• JI i 10.10 IJ 1 50 JC IJ.15 1 19' 211.81' NS 03•1J'l0• [ •1 l 4 ~ If:O_ ~ 5 5T' l1 a.96' J•la'S1• N • ' • ' ' _ /ry•ryllAMfff)MGn'aA:to I ' ' -- N 1185.96 S T6 iM1 a] J•J1 1 •:0 J91.1 03 O9 - ' --~-_- I N A. • •A yn • A+'•rN 'I ~ ' Lfxnl.c•or, ro ni !len+n II , IAIEME+r Av0 LWA Y 6u^fL --Y \`~r •0 fr 5r'M4 NIR4 MN 1•r41 r - _ - pOUNDAAr CURVE CAT..- -- !"_ L I - L ~ 1 ~~ Z ° - ~ 1 0 1 1 IIS 03 ~ 1 20 61' 03 i6 L 3 4. IA IO`5 Il E 5f 10 113 33 I N 0 1J B E . . BEY I --~ - IL ^ 3 I a J ~ D~ 1 3 1~ 1 111 ~ B~ 11 0 ~ N Ol 0) yJ J 1 nr'J 1 ~ 1.1•. 9 • s o Is u• 5 EET RELERFNCES t V 0 . ~. I a i ~ 1 ~ l LV r. 1 .Y f ~ - Lir 1 ~. ~ itxot. r L ~ J F.• _ . } c~. stA.o sii us •I4 roA i ::. sJ.e Z •1~_ Il •E[ 5 rl:t •11 rJP Ir[C TA•:r $III: L'T r13 P Gtt. St A' S ~ ROANOKE COUNTY LOCATION: ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FOR ORCHARDS, SECTION 8 DEPARTMENT \. ~ rAl • Ao Ir•r-r.r P MYA rAn(!fl!r 4Mf \. IAIIfAA d 41MJIL wOM V A'1'L/A MOw fAMN~ 14 \ o.1. ro44 w. re 1fA. 14•ft N. tONf7 1~1 77/ It'af y0.n f I' r' A-31495-6.d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on April 29, 1995. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~7~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sect. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sea. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. K5 Name of Organization f'10 u,~~~ ~` ~C (- (,Q 1L e;,r~ c rl t dt rte, ~17f q Y ~~ Mailing Address __ ~ (~ ~~X ~~c~-~ J City, state, Zip Code R ~1 C~ ~~.,~ ~~ 1~ ,~ ~L J,S When was the organization founded? ,,~ ~r-tiQ ~ l ~~ Purpose and Type of Organization h-f~L~~ - ~ rU ~i ¢- 6~1~-r'se ~ ~~ ~ (r rZ~z n~ Has the organization been fn existence in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YES NO X ~,r~~L J ~ I ~~ ~P ~ n ~-,(~. (a~ Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Is the organization exempt under 5501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YEB~_ NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. seQ• of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a 'felony? ~l PS Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such reaords are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? U~~; COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMNHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 •• Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, . organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to S 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation I~ S of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Raffles ? ~S DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SOCH ARTICLES: Article Description Fair Market Value ~ w~~~k v~~~~.~~ fir-- ~.~~ ~ o ~~~~G ~~~,,~~~ ~ wl.~ ~n CL~ c ~,-. ,hex t c~ ~- ~ ~ ,~ ~s b~ ~ ~-~ DATE OF RAFFLE ~ f G2 % ~~~5 ~ r li c ~ ~ l~ CZ ~~?~) If this application is for an ANNOAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? NOTE: Th s permit shall be valid only for the above location. Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5$) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organisation is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code ~4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~. ~ ~ -~ 5~ r ` c~jJr 6 U ~ U l ~ ~, `rL ~1 ins c^(7i.nLC~ ~l ~a~ ~ 1`~- ~ b~~ -~~-~ k ahd ~~~~~ ~~zti-~- l ~ r-~. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGIlVIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a officers of the Organization: '~„~ /~ President : ~"I Yl ~~,~y~ f,,~ Gti~,~, P,,,~ ~ Phone : '~L1 3 ~C? ~~~ -~~l Address : ~ ~- 1 Uv X /od9 S- ~ ~'~-c~~ ;r `~v~ ~~~ ~ ~ r ~! Vice President: ~~ ~ ~;1~ ~ ~ I G~ 1-rt s ~l Phone: %~/ a -.j ~~crC Address: ~.G l ~ (,~: w~~.5~ ~~-P _ ~a ~f' v~ ~(P ~~~ ~- ~C3 ~~3 Secretary: J P ~ .~p I,C f ~ Phone: .3 ~{3 ~ ~~ 3,5`•~-- Address: a a2 S n Q (~T ,+~..~(~ ~~~ c~ G Treasurer : ~ (,t,(~~ ti,-(Z~.. Pt. ~ Phone : 3 ~~ ~ %~ Address : ~ ~ ~-- T ~~ ~ ~ C- T~ 1~--~-____- I`-dCt'~~ ~~ a2 ~ 0 ~S. Member authorized to be responsible for Name : Gi1i Z. ~t'_ Home Address 5 ~.~ ~ ~~~' Phone Raffle operations: Bus Phone ~ ~/ ~ - 31 Z- Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name : U ~~,i;r' ~ d~fZ"~ ~ i Home Address ~ S ~ ~C b~/~' Phone Bus Phone Does your organisation understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? P 5 Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? V~° S IF ALL QOEBTIONB HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF 1'HE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 NOTARIZATION ~. THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN HY ALL APPLICANTS: k-5 I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 618.2-434 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 ~: sect. of the Code of Virginia and Section 4-86 et• se of the Roanoke County Code. signed by: Title l 12- `~ (~.~ c ( c,~ Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this ~_day of rnbnc~,19 q5 County/City of ~od~ru,.~rc o ~ , Virginia. ~ ~ ~/~~ in the `~ ~ ~nR~m~rv 1~_~~"CC~~K..,4a~,. My commission expires:~o 19q~ Notary Pubic NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~, /' J / C -~ 3~~~-~ Date Comma loner o the R venue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 N`~ [7 i• County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements February 28, 1995 Citizen Survey Designated for Dixie Caverns Balance at March 14, 1995 Amount $7,123,594 (40,000) (10,000) (92,000) (12,600) (2,250,000) $4,718,994 of General Fund Expenditures 8.3% 5.5% Submitted By ~;,~~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). m:finance\common\board\genera1.95 March 1, 1995 N- County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $ 29,835.86 Submittedy by ~~~. ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance • • m:\finance\common\board\capita1.95 /1~ ~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency • Original 1994-1995 Budget $90,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill (50,000) August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road (10,000) September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway (1,000) October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan (20,000) January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study (3,000) February 28, 1995 County Code Supplement (4,227) Balance as of March 14, 1995 $1,773 Submitted by ~~• ~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance r~ ~_~ m:\finance\common\board\continge.95 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -February 1995 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Payments to Vendors: $2,999,281.57 Payroll: 2/10/95 $572,745.39 2/24/95 553,910.32 1,126,655.71 $4,125,937.28 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. • SUBMITTED BY: C~.c.cz~. ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: r~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke - - - Minnix - - - Nickens ` Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ` AT A .REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OOUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CRAIGIE 1,983,912.50 FERGUSON-ANDREWS 1,190,741.00 NATIONS 1,982,950.28 SIGNET 992,875.00 S1~ILTH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 990,412.50 WHEAT 1ST 2,359,418.38 9,500,309.66 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN COMMERICAL PAPER: CENTRAL FIDELITY COMMONWEALTH INVESTMENT CRESTAR NATIONS PAINE-WEBBER SCOTT & STRINGr~LTAW SIGNET 100,000.00 989,527.78 198,033.33 1,9$9,374.02 991,000.00 1,980,701.38 992,625.00 1,985,826.39 100,000.00 9,127,087.90 FIDERAL CRID IT SCOTT & STRINGFELL~OW LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND RESOURCE AUTHORITY REPURCHASE AGREII~7T FIRST VIRGINIA SAVINGS: FIRST UNION NATIONS TREASURY BILL: PRUDENTIAL 'T'OTAL 990,428.89 3,011,002.50 6,750,831.16 990,428.89 9,761,833.66 3,997,000.00 3,997,000.00 2,303.89 2,717.22 5,021.11 985,465.28 985,465.28 --------------- 33,481,681.22 Palle 2 of 2 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE O~UN'I'Y ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1995. STAFF RECOMMENDATION R/es'p~e' lly Sub ed by - ---- -- red C. Anderson County Treasurer Approved Denied Received Referred `I'o ACTION Motion by: Appr ed by~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson _ _ _ Kohnike _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 's l1 C1 01 r-I H O N W Tgii W a 00000000 000000000000000 t11tf1M~0\OIDr-10 ~OOOOONMOOOd' 001Lf11110 MOpI~OlO0p010 0~0101010~r-I0000100D000100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~O U1 1!1 t11 ~O t11 l11 ~O tf1 lf1 ~ l!1 111 l0 l0 ~C l0 lt1 lC tll 111 Lf1 111 lOf) r~-I N N O \O O~ lOf 1~ M O M O O1 N OD r-I r M 0~ lOf 1 O~ O N r-~ O~ l11 I.f 1 O O l~ N 01 M r-I M O 00 I~ 0~ O~ O~ rl t11 ~--I N O 01 O O M M \C I~ ~' O N rl ~O M ci' M O N d' ~~ O O N M r-1 O ~O O OppIfl~OpNOl11~~0[~r161 V'NOIf10~Ol~ON00010 '-~I O ~O Lf 1 N O\ r-1 Ol O 00 CD O O O O tf 1 r-I O O r-I N N M O r~ l~ rl l11 l~ OD C1 O~ Ol CO 01 OD 01 01 Q~ Ol Q~ 01 Ol 01 61 01 Q~ Ol O~ O Ol O~ O [~ M O~ 01 O1 Ol C1 O~ O~ rl r1 O1 01 01 O~ Ol O~ O1 O1 O~ O1 O~ O O~ O- M ~O r~ r~ M r-I r-1 O O~ M d' M t1' O rl d' M O ~ ~ r-I l~ r-I .~ I~ l~ O l~ d' 00 r-1 M M rl O O N r-~ N N M N r-t N N M O N M ,--~ O O r~ O N r-~ O MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMV'd'd' V'd'M'd'M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L(1 lf1 l11 Lf1 lf1 lfl Lfl Ln l11 111 lfl Lfl 111 111 lfl Lt7 111 Lfl 111 L[1 111 Ill 111 111 ~ lfl 01 01 01 01 O~ O~ Cl O~ 01 01 C~ C1 O~ C1 C1 01 01 O~ 01 O~ O~ 01 01 d1 O~ 01 r-I ,--~ ~O 00 1~ 00 00 OD O O d' to t` O ~ r-1 N N t11 1~ r--~ N M d' 00 CD O O O O r- I~ r 1 r- I N N N N N M M M O O r l r l N N N N N N l~ l~ N N r-I r-1 r-I r-I r-1 r~'I r-I r-1 r~ rl rl rl N N N N N N N N N N O O rl rl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' d' ~1' d' to lf1 l11 I11 U'1 111 111 111 111 l!'1 Lfl l11 111 111 111 111 111 Lf1 lf1 ~ lf1 l11 O~ O~ 01 01 O~ O~ Cl O~ 01 C1 C1 O~ O~ 01 01 01 01 O~ O~ 01 01 01 01 01 01 O- 2 ~~ ~ ~ ~ A (~ ~ ~ CQ Q C7 CEI~ ~ ~j. ~ "~ ~] ~ ~ ~ ~~H~~ho ~~ F+C7cn~~~E+ocn~C7~E-IE-1 vFi~ii~~cn~~ v'~w~~~v~vHizv~i~Z~nw~~~~+ 01 d' N N ~O M M Ns H c~ H H H H /~/r~ ~~ M O lD OD O ~p ~ O M N CO O ,--~ O \p ~ n N ~ '--I f~ LC1 ~~E~-I ~ ~ 01 Lf') N r-I N ~O C'1 Lf1 M a ~a a ~ a H 0 ~- N 0 0 e . oM e e W W u 1- do r • i c ui • 01 > V ~ • O) Q: Q • w ~ > u iv +/ c p ~ c •v O • O: r -- f 1 O ~+ r T r rW c 7 -~ O O u r C • •~ • r • m M N 0 S O 0 r L O O. • O: .~., ... _ __ n can ' + a n n a ~ n a s a x a a n~= a .. - _, ~- .. T,. j i I I i M • ~ I ~qri ~>'0PI ZIM71 A r m ~ Y~- • 1 ~•i u1 .w • I A .+ I • 1 P 1 1 • t ci • i > I • 1 O: I ~ri '-1 7 1 ~ 1 > 1 • 1 O: ; i V 1 O I m 1 i 1 in I I aloes. ~ F m t ?o.m0: f f 1O~UI1 f0- 1, ~a Ir Ir iu 1 0 10 it I- . ~ u 1 •J is .~ •r .c ~c iq ~r r F ~~ 4 C 6 c C r, 6 ~~au if1Ar o.fa f ~ u IoNr N I f 0 N< 0) oee O O ~ O o e ~Ylfa IO M • L r • ~ o. m o w~ cI r O 1 y o L r 1 O r M ~ R ~ o•c V r C •I+ 1 u w y . L r 1 • • ~ OO w r• uwl w w 1 .. w i ae~ ~ • e O. d 0 d NM\ e e C ~ ~ ~ ~~ ', ~I j i I I ~I ~ I~ ~, ~ ~I ~ I i I i I ' I i ~ ~' I ~ I I I j I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ FNfiIo IO oP apo efNeo oIO IgFN aNaulF dNOm FMMI~f NNNO 1111!1 MNNOO oMMmM10 Ff-,ofdNOM m~FMF~IOf FO IO ~.:OM Mfff aqN O11111O IO {M o NIO df am F~ Fo~MUI .e ION CIO mY1 ~a IOf iM m ^ I J ~ ' i 1 1 1 1 1) 1 ~~ 1 II I ~ 1 ~I ~ '' ~. FoI ~WIOf Io o.o OIf ^I aDf f1yyNmmeYldoolrMa apo sr F F ~ ' N~-111010 fOI No MIO MIOf mlo 1111a Y110 t~NNO7mf Mf Ow N ~ N ~. oeI OIO FUI M~ olA d11-~fle Ol miM Yl OI U11~-N ~e lA f, .- I f FIAI YIf ma NN F YIf sl~fM --.owaYl llY--f F ma N N fm Nf F f i N CIO IOOf Nf TYIPm IFNa T OI ~- YI N M M j N I M f~ N ..--11 M MIA F N M ry Ifi l11 ', ' N ~- ~- ' I I •- f ~ Ip IO ~' f f i i No MYI aDM oo .-rad O)P N10 rrrrrfryryryryry!me o.N Nq~1oo o .-; o. o~ mo OIM Nf ~~ f O dFM e1A lybm oNNOIF F f; m '~a ~; ~ YIF OI YI •O NN CIO e01 OI O) fOI IO .- OMYI OIO .- F N N I Y1~ fo fN fN Ylf w-U1 N IOF ff.0lf 0) o. oI Ip i ON N~ Nf N~'IO Iq M No.ol •-.o M .al N N I M N N i^ i f f aD ~ Yt 0 a ~ o ut ~~ 111 W N e m m F IfY aD m ! FF F a No. •0a -0 Mo OIdmM N Io m - ' F M N N N IO M f f ~f 0~ F~ M m N ~M O ~ m m aM Io f IOM NIo Nf MMfI a m~ a W M N I N I Io YI ~o M ~ F of YI o Io YI M oI o. j YI N ~ , N YI I W M M Ii 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O O~ O O d F~ o YI M O M f 0 N O F F ' 00 00 00 00 0o Moo) Io 0111q oY1 oIO YIf f f I O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 YI YI N N O f O M .-I O F Y) 0 0 ~ IA ~ ~ .~ oui Yio ooauie mui uir- + ri~aoYiNoood+I ~ui :aor7 ui ui 0o FYI NOYI YIN mf .. ap o. ION gOIM NfIO j~m.a a m N.~ Ylf NY1 f ~ OI~NM Nf ~~ Ff Mm1 0 m IAf ~ ~ M `~- I^f F F I I a Im ' M it r i i ,~ v • a -. 1' < r • r o s • LL • c a u r I x 4. • .. • x • ~ r r• u> v u r r F • F r t 7 L +I L F C x r L O• • C ~ V L• < 7 • • • • ~ u L • oOI o T u Fo • rr •.. a> s IIa rn r w O Y. •w M> O• ~1 ••+ A xw J •K _ P• 7 L LK • r r r U P O ~~ r L- • L M M• • w I w C Z r ~ .. •• . L L O O v 7 w C O O U LL r~ F U U r r r V LL L L • O L• • M O C • w w 0 • C 4. O L• O a r •~ J -I r • L J L x 0 !I O ~. • C OI x • M r C < J QL r• •Cl O.C r L• •W r •w F < O• +~ > T y 1 F r O N • r N ~+ w W• V LL O F- ~+7 YL w.. L• w Or CP L• C7• L^ LL F •r co .»• •t tr r• •L •u 1 c •a. •• Yc ~r -+r Lw L• oc > ~ .+• c~ L-+ LL a O O L O r 0 r C •• L ~+ • L • w O L r• r r Z Jti LLL 72 O< O.Y. LY. CU R= 2m 03 00 < e.- Mf IOF oIo Nf O)OI .-N e~ o.- Mo wN V NN NN NN NM MM MM ff PP IO.O FO mOI O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O S-__ R~ n n n a n C n^ a .: ~ a x r A~ 9 1 1! 4 1 A .. ~ '1 } r-6 n'.. U A .; A P. ', R n t R 1 A n Y T -r ~- •* RI:: w••_ m w .- a 00 o ~ oM eo W W u -- rL o a C w N G o. O L < Q a w w A c e O~aY L • h u. >~c n L Y ~i~ C V ~ OWI 0: ~- a h O L ` T 7 7 r V V • 0 o.. x V W 0 Fe 0 • 7 9 • L u 0 a 0 S O O r L O o. • Q I ~~~0 r C d O a~x~ x W q w' F~+I >~ v • L • I° ^ u~ :I a a ^ 7 ul CI q W 1 i Iatl P C a c w. a 7 COI L~ O L I I I I NN Fo M~r~F wY1FF~ Mb°-'~OrNN ~ IAM~b III ~O F, rMO~IA i rFYI °--~ m.•~o'aOoN~O N M I ~ m M a IO t0 0~ r F F F M lfl N M d~ F M ~• ' F ~O ~ i b .O (t i .O YI ~O YI i ~O Yt ~O .O ~d , O~ F .D F .OI ~O i I ! I i I I i I ! , o FM e N t Nro~ul Fr..-.-m~ M moaoKNNMM N em m Mo m NFOY1 w ~ONo~o N FYL~M~-QOM M Y1M~01 Ill ~N~ r ~O~MF NP~r~ O~ r~~OINM~OO ~ N F fI r o ~O f~ a F F a o ~ o~ a0 a~ M N N N r o: M ~O ~ e~ '~Om N ',mr .Frs. N ~~-OO~~O CO ~-FN rM m I O .N~ r O~•el b o~1A M ~ °-Nr N I N- I r M 0 o•oN m mN~aI IA Mrr aD d e•aor ~O aMMloFmm N Ma W, N oul~ N ma 'N N III ~O oo~ M 'YI ~O FaO OOH ''' M e.O ~ O~ UI III ~ aF~o , O~NMMIA) ~ jN°-f~-YI~ Ihr ' ~ - i - _ I .- YI F of N F Ifl r ' ~O T N a F o r r 'i °- ~- rI O ~ M' T ~•Ul r ~Ow N Fr o ~ .-NN~O N M~NmNrF ~-N UI NN o MM ~IryN~ F i MOJ ~• N M M r N N °-± ~- UI I ~ ' ^~ e•F F UI YI ~- rlodT TMNe N i Ql ~- a N r °- ~O N M N °- ulI a .• ~O COI N o• M F F ~ F ad W y 0• ~ Oyyy .tt D•, i ~• F r r m ~- of ~ o• ~e N d o N ^ N N oOti a7) N10~ `a N I i N M i • W J -- 0 W 2 u ro m i • • e 0 e N r UI lA F N a O I!I U1 O ~ W~ eM r O~ or r F r o r WUIr o cONmIN M i F ~O .• F ~ O W M r ~O W ~O T eq 0 ~ I, e F N F I Y ~O M ~ 10 N O IA IO i1 N mI F M •I ~ ~ 1 ~ M YY F M I ~ I W l •- M M UI M a r N m 71 F FFFFIIII N .-I O^ m m l , i IIM . I FO a mtA a NOS r ~•U~N ~O O~ •~ I , YIMNTONN ~ oaD .•o o IA MM Oo ~ O mm O~• O aq NIO~~OF u1 NOIrFIf~ O I F FM1ry oeMM .OMr~m UI~M ! ~ 11 I F IA F F ~- r a r Ill A W N IO ~O M ~0 F M If1 Yh O~ F N' n I Nr ~o NO M ION e, al M IIIW o ~ MNNONaD,~ ' N~ Ill aor N Mo , .-~aDNa+ o. ~ ' rN^ M IA YI ~ •e r I M M N ~ ~ cp n'.- ~ ~' ~ v Ic [ ~ I L < 0 7 c I r U I w C C w it I I ~ w i I a c ~ ~ < ~ i i ~ i r t a a , > C ~ Y iP I i o L L • L u o r o • L o V r •+ I~ 3 V w C '+ r w r ~+ O I C c.t a w • t ++ C ~ I .. w x u w •+' • C L Y •• O M • +~ t L r °+ U . i • t ~+ ^ 7 L O ~+ •+ y r a w ~ > • •+ 7 U a C a C^ 7 ~~ a 0 L w •~ V • '7 L • O ~ O O° • • a ~+ • r • OK V D LCI 22 < M m w .+ e s e ~ • 0 7 -.w o rc o c+ .. • •• o .+u ur .~ ^ L ~- r 0 N W • a C P r w -. .. ~+ w .. • e L ^ O • ^ 7 ~ o r ~+ ~+ r ~ O1C 7^ ~ sL A- PL CO oa U •• O O w~ C • C• • 7 7 C O JO V V JIL < O: Wu L0. 0. ~+ m ee o0 oe YI o eYl eYl Yle e ~N ~°N N r N MM Na Mr In N N M M M r r r m In ul In In O e e o e o 0 0 0 0 O e o e e M c H N A R A B A R D :. A A 11 A•^ 4 9 ~ 7 1 7 f 9 A A 1 a t ^. i II W '11 l T N a~i 00 e~ o r1 0 0 WW ur c< o. ca ^ C A L n O L au na <~ a w C~ wa w OI • 4 L • t -. u . > cc w .Lu •ac at • O 7 d c u. we OWI O: w • ~ O L < T77 M V o ci v •o w4 W d ~. e O • 7 v • t u rA N O 2 0 L O o. • O: .. .. .. . .. s _ .. _ _ _ __ ~ _ d d A A R n ~ '+ n-~ ~ '~ i C dI 0 I • ^ r 1 x U x P l WWI.71 F ~ m I N ~ 1 i L • 1 •ul ~ ~ 1 ~ .. 1 u • I •m I i? 1 ri I L a I' CIO Ili uo r vlcr t cw>'- I •s I x 1 W ~ci vwl ~ ~ +~ ^ I • ] I ~ci O W 1 I •+ ~ t t ++ 1 cci 0.1 snl K I W I I 9 1 ~ 1 N 1 ^ c i ~ w x ~0 1 L r • I F L > 1 .r M L ~ 3 Cq C .~ ^O^ 1 v M t t i V M M~ I .+ OCL ~ ~ w ~ = 0: M V 1 o .• a.wa i ~ O LM~L ~ O Lw J+M 1 arc.+ .+•o~ J < tl V o O e o MfN~• F F F F 0 0 0 0 _ _ _ A ~ ~ i ~ ~' I I i i e ~•+0- m NOS ^~e ojmmo.eooeaa o tAf ~~ -~ ' ~ F o o N I e F F~ - ~O o~, o .- o: e o 0 o a o: ' f 7 ; ~• f. FI O YI- lo YI Ne-- oi.0 ~e ~ o M ' A ~ ~O No YI F . ~ N YI ~O ~O o a 111 ml O YI I N. N N i I i I- , . . I I I ~ I leo~til ~o o~ lN o+ e• ~ o i ~t~ Y !Y1 e m-e M o mmfe aD NO f + N O l o m N M m •' N o ?- o f a0 f YI aD O~ 7 NI F +Y F J F F aD M NI N 111 0l Y o N, YI Ill o l 7) A a o:.D o M. ~O ~O YI N - . F M - aD: 0 I~ 011 ~N ~ ~ O o Y1:~M O+ a Y!F O+YI~YNNMoeW ~O a0- o N N 'I a .a+ 1111 aD{ ~ v v N i^ co Y l N M e M I N - i a M ~o; N Y1 N to N N o N Y- YN ..f N M 7 M M- aD 'I• ~o a ~• ! a+ - ' I .: , I I i ~ ~ ~o ~ F ~ - o a" M i F - ! YI a7 Y1 F ~• NI .. - j o - - o as N ! N N N I F M N M N! IO f0 7 .- .~ : F M F -~ F ~O M F~ N P I O OI aq O M' ~ YII + Y N _ m +- F O ' O+ ~ F M' M! M' M! T ~• +• f F .J .- , ~O F UI .• M .~ O O. F O ~ . a. ._ .~ . F N faDM YI F F F'MN I o o!Oe I W N; -ml N ' M mM f ' I~ 10 Fj N' N F NFO O .O F~O fY M I-N , 111 ~ F YI IA , - YI M 41 v+! mi M ~• t0 . N N ~O o -1 ~O ~, ri - L N ! I I I I I i - ' M N M N o! IA of Yli .O ~O F ~ f N YI O rrI j ! j ~ ~ '~, N' N a N N I o e F o ~ ~ o I YI W o ; it . N m e 111 i i ti - ~ i I M' M i I ,I ~ : ~O; i ~• ! a YI • YI f o YI - o N N +O ~O r m N O F +- O O N m a0' ~O a F Y11 F lll' a a i I- ~ F I F V1I F~ N FI M M a+ aD YI ~• M o a W e COI aD o~ a+ t0 '., f I • aDI aDl YI f Maoe M - e-wui a ~ ~o ~ My~o a e. co M ao :M M M i M N' NI N1 N 0 N a N e - f N M : '~o .O m~ I a+ I 1 f I I ~ FI NI M F N +o-M P 'f - e 1• N .. NYIaIp N f 1A o YI N Fao eo ~YI aO I OI N o f o YI ~o ~ e F I Iaa I T O+ a O+ FI YI F f N Y1 eI/IF F ~• Ylmo+- N •I aDo bo .Of ~ F ~fM aD -I ~- 1• N MON ~0 I m aDNlo ai o oe Ye MN a 'Ff 1117 111 N M F N aD - N a o f oI M NI e+ aD +o +- N- M ~ o+ f ' f a01 t0 M e M- F f-F f t N- m IaD +1 M 101 W YI N .• M - N ' r ~ O , w , ~ I I n ~ I i i N I I , 1 • w 1 L 0 i L ~ O. 1 C C OCw C C • nJ+ w V O L cK..o O W • n N > r • • C ~•~G~ PM Ur / C •~ .. L ^ Y C O .~ C C ~+ woos ~ O V 7 6t1W0. YloYle ao~om O O O O b A ?! A A p c • e n O • • T I M 1 C 1 7 ! I O 1 V e ~ O O O i 1 ~ ~ ~ a c • c • 0 1 .. .. ~ V M I M M ^ ~ ^ C 1 • O O 1 v u r 1 ~ Diu ^ ^ °a J. l C O ~+ v J ~ C ~ L i w w .y t) t>t r C • w V 0 7 1 x • P~ + .. .. ••1 O ! O: O: E YIN Ylol: N Mf+ a•~ aT[ O O O O < A a { >! ~ I I ~ ~ 7 7 C ~ Q 1 • ^ • M V J+ L L C M L • • I.+U n rM m > D ~ ~ 1 L 1 L L !+ • C r F ICO 2 9~ I C C o ~ 1' w L a L ~ M • e • L O C C C ~{~w w N IMII ~O +a a s I T T O O O O J+ O w L 4 O M 2 w 4. L r e F s a O O O r i 0: u ., 11 w 1 T 7 7 9 :+ ~ :t a x+ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Report on the results of the 1995 Session of the Virginia General Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' At your meeting on February 28, 1995, you requested a report on the status of certain legislative issues addressed by the 1995 issue of the Virginia General Assembly. Although the General Assembly concluded its session on February 25, 1995, many of the difficult issues it debated will be revisited during the veto session on April 5, 1995. The following is the best information available to me at this time with respect to legislative issues of significant interest to Roanoke County. Since the General Assembly either fully or partially restored major funding items that had been eliminated or reduced in the Governor's recommended budget, you should be aware that all of the budget measures are tentative until the April 5 veto session. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. HB599 Funding - $10 million of HB599 funding was restored so localities can expect the same funding in FY 1996 that they will receive in FY 1995. (A complete analysis of the revised budget and estimates by locality will be published by VACO in April.) 2. SB560 Constitutional Officers Fringe Benefits - SB560 increases most service of process fees in sheriff's offices and earmarks these proceeds for fringe benefits for constitutional officers. 3. Commissioners of Revenue and Treasurers will receive the full amount of funding that the Governor had eliminated, $8.7 million. 4. Salary increases - 2.25% salary increases are scheduled 1 i N-~ to take effect December 1, 1995, for (1) general registrars and members of local electoral boards, (2) locally elected constitutional officers and full time employees of locally elected constitutional officers and, (3) deputy sheriffs will also be eligible for a 2.5~ salary regrade on this date. 5. Education - It appears that Roanoke County Schools will receive an additional $41,947 in direct aid (based on an average daily membership of $13,806 and a composite index of 0.3970). In addition, a technology grant totaling $46.5 million was approved for expanded access to educational technology to fund grants to automate every school library statewide and to begin networking from the library into individual classrooms. These grants will be provided on an incentive basis with a 20~ local match requirement. Roanoke County would be eligible for an educational technology grant of $667,025. VPSA will sell bonds to be repaid over five years to fund these grants. 6. Enterprise zones - The number of enterprise zones has been increased to 50. The total amount of tax credits is limited to $5 million for each fiscal year and an enterprise zone grant fund will be established and appropriations will be made by the General Assembly. The maximum grant an eligible business firm can receive for any grant year is $100,000. 7. Mobile homes in agricultural districts - SB641 passed the General Assembly. This legislation permits the placement of manufactured houses on a permanent foundation on individual lots "in all agricultural zoning districts or districts having similar classifications regardless of name or designation subject to development standards applicable to site-built single family dwellings. ..". 8. Bingo enforcement - SB1020 passed the General Assembly. This legislation as amended created a Charitable Gaming Commission to control all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth. This legislation shall become effective on July 1, 1996 except that the Charitable Gaming Commission shall promulgate regulations as soon as possible on or after July 1, 1995. Local ordinances shall remain in effect until July 1, 1996, when the Charitable Gaming Commission assumes control of all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth. 9. Retired teacher benefits - I am advised by Legislative Services that HB1927 passed the House, however it died in a Senate committee. 10. BPOL - Although the initiative to eliminate the BPOL tax was defeated, this effort will probably be renewed next year. Currently I am reviewing Roanoke County's ordinance with the Commissioner of the Revenue and comparing it to a model BPOL developed by a legislative study committee. The Commissioner of 2 N-~ the Revenue and I may recommend amendments to the County ordinance to you in the near future. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix genera1.95.rp[ Vote No Yes Abs 3 J ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER N-S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Bulk and Brush Collection COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND- On January 25, 1994, the Board of Supervisors authorized the implementation of on-call, twice-monthly bulk and brush collection. The program began in September 1994, and requires that residents call to schedule collection of bulk or brush items. It was felt that a successful implementation of the program would require an extensive public education campaign and a variety of methods were employed including a direct mailing, newspaper ads, and information on the government access channel. The cost for implementing the new system was $10,410 for advertising, the purchase of two knuckle booms at $58,000 each and the hiring of a call taker using an existing vacant position. SUHIIKARY OF INFORMATION Under the original guidelines, only those materials scheduled were to be collected. The staff began logging calls in October, 1994, and since then, bulk/brush calls have comprised 590 of the total. Less than 3% of the calls are characterized as complaints. The remainder are general in nature and relate to such subjects as recycling and holiday collection. Complaints regarding bulk/brush collection are generally the result of a lack of understanding of the specifics of the program and these complaints are declining as we continue to educate the citizens regarding the system. Initially, one of the biggest complaints was our policy of collecting only material that was scheduled. As a result, a transition period was used in September, and all material left on the street was collected and a brochure explaining the program was left at the door. On October 3, 1994, we returned to the practice of collecting only materials that were scheduled. Some residents continue to set material out with no call for service. Although the program was designed, staffed and equipped to serve only residents that call, in order to make the very best use of our resources, and out of concern for the appearance of the _~ N-g County, we have moved to a hybrid collection system. As time allows, unscheduled material is collected within the scheduled area and within the normal work schedule. When this is done, a program brochure is left at the door. This procedure is totally dependent upon the number of scheduled calls for the day. However, the approach does tend to allow improved service. Citizens calling for service still receive it every two weeks, on schedule. Those who do not call will receive service more frequently than once a month. With this approach, the neighborhoods are cleaner than in either of the two previous methods, that is, once per month or, call-in collection only. As predicted, the transition has been tedious, but the system is definitely settling down now and, with the present approach, it does represent an improvement in service. Although the call taker was hired for purposes of taking requests for bulk and brush service, that person also takes all other calls related to solid waste which represent about 41% of the total. So, in addition to cleaner neighborhoods we are generally more responsive to calls from citizens. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the modified call-in brush/bulk program for another six months and to review it again at that time. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: W V William J. RaR III Elmer C. Hodge Director, General services County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Approved Denied Received Ref erred To Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Please pull out the attached materials from your agenda packet and file with your 1995-96 budget notebook for future reference. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the March 14, 1995 work session, we will review a number of expenditure issues that will be brought forward during development of the FY1995-96 budget. In-depth details of each specific item will be provided to the Board after team budget hearings have been completed. These hearings are currently in progress. You will also be provided with an updated budget calendar, estimated revenues and a draft of the vehicle replacement policy. School Superintendent Deanna Gordon and the members of the School Board will attend a joint work session with the Board of Supervisors to discuss the needs and concerns of the FY1995-96 Roanoke County School Budget. Respectfully submitted, _`_~ W. Brent Robe tson Budget Manager Approved_ by, r sL! Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Johnson - - - Kohinke - - - Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~- BUDGET WORK SESSION MARCH 14, 1995 Attached for your information is material that we would like to cover at the Board of Supervisors work session on Tuesday, March 14. At this meeting we want to spend some time working through the issue of debt service, vehicle replacement, and an overview of the school and County budgets as they are at this time. As is usually the case at this stage of the budget process, both the school and County budgets are out of balance. The School budget is out by $961,524 and the County budget is out by approximately $1.5 million. Dr. Gordon and I realize we will have to continue to work through the budget process to bring a final budget to you, but we want to have your participation and guidance at this time. The citizen review committee will also be working though the County budget during the next two weeks and will have recommendations to us in early April. Three debt schedules are attached for your review: Schedule 1 -Combined County and School Debt; Schedule 2 -School Debt; Schedule 3 -County Debt Analysis. As you can see from the combined debt analysis, there are significant increases in the next two years that will have to be absorbed within recurring revenues. Also attached is a listing of those projects included in the $10.1 million spring 1995 VPSA bond issue already approved by the Board. A public hearing on this issue is required and we have scheduled it for the March 28 Board meeting. The other attachment is a list of significant items that have been requested by the Board and staff that we have included in the County budget. If you have questions on any of these, please let me know. Otherwise, we will discuss these schedules with the School Board and administration at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 14. Table of Contents (}-~ 1. Calendar .............................................. 1-1 2. Summaries 3. Expenditures Mid-year Expenditure Summary ......................... 3-1 Significant Departmental Expenditure Requests .......... 3-4 4. Revenues General Government Revenues--Update ................. 4-1 5. Funded Capital 6. Additional Funding Requests (Addbacks) 7. Personnel 8. School Budget 9. CIP 10. Vehicle Inventory ......................................... 10-1 Public Safety ........................................ 10-2 General Administration ............................... 10-7 Vehicle Replacement Policy (Draft) ................... 10-11 11. Debt Service Combined County and School Debt Service ....... ~...... 11-1 Analysis of School Debt Service ....................... 11-2 Analysis of County Debt Service ....................... 11-3 Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale ......................... 11-4 School Board--Authorized but Not Issued Loans ......... 11-5 12. Notes/Miscellaneous M:\FINANCE\BUDGET\WORKSES\TOC96. WPD Budget Calendar FY 1995-96 Q~~ 2/14/95 Finalize vehicle inventory, mid-year budget report -projections Finalize revenue projections 2/17/95 Departmental budgets due to Budget Department 2/17 to 3/3/95 Budget Department review of budgets 2/28/95 Budget work session- revenues, mid-year expend., vehicle inventory Public Hearing: General comment on FY1995-96 budget 3/8 to 3/31/95 Budget Team Meetings/Citizen's Budget Review Committee Prioritized Addbacks, Capital Improvements, Presentation of Departmental budgets, Discussion of Funding Issues 3/8 Citizen's Committee 3/13 Internal Support and Operations Budget Team (ISOP) 3/15 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services Budget Team 3/17 Public Safety Budget Team 3/20 Internal Support and Operations 3/22 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services 3/24 Public Safety 3/29 Citizen's Committee-Isop, Community Services 4/5 Citizen's Committee-Public Safety, Courts/State Agencies 4/19 Citizen's Committee-CIP, Final proposal 3/14/95 Budget work session -joint work session with School Board 3/27-3/31/95 Team budget presentations to County Administrator 3/28/95 Public Hearing: Tax Rates and Tax Assessment Increase(101 %) Joint budget work session with School Board 4/1/95 School Board presents budget to Board of Supervisors 4/4/95 Special Meeting -Budget work session Adopt Tax Rates 4/11/95 Volunteer Rescue and Fire Chiefs budget work session 4/25/95 Budget work session, Public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget and CIP 5/9/95 Adoption of Budget and CIP 5/23/95 First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance 6/13/95 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance M:\FINANCE\BUDGE11Worksessn\CA4LONG.WP ~_ County of Roanoke R/~ Summary of Significant Departmental Requests FY1995-96 March 14, 1995 Department Description Cost Engineering VDOT Revenue Sharing $500,000 Court Service Unit Increased Detention Costs 110,000 Fire and Rescue Underground Fuel Tank Replacement 150,000 Pumper Replacement (1) 250,000 Ambulance Replacement (2) 150,000 Vinton-Shared Salary Costs-personnel increase 7,000 Elections Voter Machine Replacement 250,000 General Services Automated Refuse Collection Vehicle 140,000 Tipping Fee Increases: Tonnage increase 210,000 Citizen Drop-off Program 90,000 Phase-out of credit 170,000 Critical Maintenance Needs: Fire station repairs/upgrades 177,000 Library Headquarters carpet replacement 15,000 Roof Replacements 54,000 Economic Development Phase II-Valley TechPark 500,000 Hanover Direct-Turn Lane Construction 200,000 Public/Private Partnerships 250,000 Court System Security Lock System 32,000 Telephone System 60,000 finance\budget\worksessn\expol ist.95 3-4 County of Roanoke Summary of Significant Departmental Requests FY1995-96 March 14, 1995 Department Description County-Wide Vehicle Replacement Program (need for annual replacement=$2,000,000) Salary Increase-2.7% plus 1.3% Merit Departmental Requests Additional Funding Requests--anticipated requests to be made during departmental budget hearings (currently in progress). Unfunded. Total finance\budget\worksessn\expol ist.95 Cost 300,000 900,000 5,500,000 $10,015,000 b-~ ~ 3-5 W ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 000000000000000000000 0 U` O l~ l~ v'i O O O l~ M O ~D 0 0 0 v'i .-+ O M ~n M ~O Z ~O ~O [~ N O O O ~--~ 00 N N O O O O N N O vi ~n N ~O "Q~i i U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 ~--~ O ~O O O O O O O O O O O M ~' O O O O N ~ m O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 l~ Q\ N O~ O •-+ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O O O N ~~ N oo ~ ~ ~ N ~~ N In O 'n ~ `-' N N M ~" U N c n ^ " M ~ '' ~ N ~ q ~N ~ ~.." t~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~i ~ O ~ ~ w O U o C7 a~ c ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O N 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ O O O O ~' O M ~ ~ y +•' N O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 N N Vl O~ O ~! ~ bq ~ 1 .-i ~--i O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~/1 0 0 0 0 ~O [~ O~ O ' ' ~ b 1 l~ ~ N ~O ~ 0 0 Vl M M 00 ~O V O O~ M O O ~!1 l~ v M O i ~ O N N M l~ 00 N tt ~O ~O O ,--i ,_, ~ ~ N ~ .-•. v? ~ p.i ~ w M ~ N vi M N ~ N ~ ~-' ~ 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~O O O O M 00 l~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M O M 0 0 0 0~ O M O v ~ '--~ M ~~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v1 N O i O l ~ ~ bq ~', 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' O vi ~ oo l~ ~ vi ~--~ M 00 O~ ~ l~ A N N N N ° b~ ~ 1 O o0 00 O O O~~ O O 00 00 O N l~ OO N 7 ~O ~ d\ ~ .., ~ 7 N ~ ~ ~ N Q W w ~O M N ~n M N ~--~ ~-+ r 'n ^" ~ \ M •--~ l ffl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O M O ~O . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~/'~ O O O O O ~n Q ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~!l 0 0 0 0 M 0 00 ~_ ~ 4i O N O O O V'i O O v'i O O O O M l~ O~ 4\ X 0 0 0 ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ p Obi N ~ ~ N ~ O .r N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ '--~ ~O O N ~ ~D ~O N . ~ Q w ~~ N~ M M ~ N ~ ~ ~-+ N L~ '-' M 00 6 9 1G E-" N U ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ ~ U ~ °' p N ~ N U y ~ ~ , " ~ [~ p ~ E" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ y V1 ~ U , U , V. w ~ w ~n ~ ~ w ~ v ~ ~ ~ a ~ °'~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ° ~ h .. a~ ° ~ o .j o ~ a; a O a~ G G CQ ~ a~ o c4 x a~ ° .~ ~ U~ a w ~ ,~ •~ ~ o ° ~ U~~ U w W > W ua ~-1 4-1 • VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ~~~ POLICY • * EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Outlined below is the summarized version of the replacement policy for all County vehicles and equipment. It was through the extensive efforts of the Facilities Management Team that we offer these recommendations to be adopted as policy for all departments in the County of Roanoke. All Roanoke County Departments are included under this program. The County School Board is not covered under this program. School buses have state mandates for replacement which they have to follow. The Schools could adopt this policy in the same manner as we adopted their sick leave policy. The policy considers several factors before replacing a vehicle or piece of equipment. The policy, of which there is no perfect plan, is designed to best fit the needs of our employees and provide quality customer service. Therefore, the following areas were incorporated to provide a comprehensive method of evaluating the vehicle for replacement. No one criterion should be used as the measure to replace a vehicle, but rather consider all criteria to move a vehicle systematically through the process until its effectiveness and efficiency has been maximized. Comprehensive Replacement Criteria • --age --safety --vehicle condition --function of use --obsolescence --downtime --available funds for --mileage --ops. and maint. cost --major repair costs --market value --replacement costs --morale and image replacement & operations The agencies surveyed are as follows. Cities: Lynchburg Hampton Roanoke City Portsmouth Suffolk Counties: - State: Albemarle State Police Hanover Forestry James City Parks Loudon Transportation Montgomery Rockingham Stafford 10-11 • page 2 , Vehicle Replacement July 29, 1993 Agencies continued. Federal: National Park Service Private: Dominion Bank APCO First Virginia Bank C&P Telephone Hertz Car Rental Avis Car Rental Standard County Vehicles Vehicle Type Sedans (emergency) Sedans (non-emergency) • Pick-up Trucks (all) Vans Dump Trucks (single axle) County Equipment Equipment Type Dump Trucks (med. and large) Tractor/Loaders/Back hoes, etc. Grader (small) Replacement Eligibility 75,000 miles or 4 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 10 years Replacement Eligibility 100,000 miles or 10 years 25,000 hours or 12 years 20' years Fire and Rescue Vehicles/Equipment Vehicle Type Replacement Eligibility Ambulance 60,000 miles or 6 years Crash Trucks (light & med. duty) 100,000 miles or 15 years Crash Trucks (heavy duty) 100,000 miles or 20 years Fire Trucks 12 years Ladder and Brush Trucks 15 years Air Trucks 75,000 miles or 5 years i• 0- 10-12 Dx ~r z i• page 3 , Vehicle Replacement July 29, 1993 tJ' VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICY • This is a policy to be used as a guideline for planning and budgeting the replacement of vehicles and equipment in Roanoke County. It will allow the Board of Supervisors to provide a dependable cost efficient motorized fleet within the County. The following recommendations outlined below describe the means to implement the policy. A. Automated Fleet Management System (FMS): Cost savings can be realized through improved planning of preventive vehicle/equipment maintenance. Better management of purchasing, replacement, fleet review, historical cost analysis, department charge backs, and a parts inventory would be the goals of this system. The computer system would allow a manager to track maintenance histories, identify potential problems, and coordinate future work and preventive maintenance. An option could be available to prevent or restrict the amount of fuel a vehicle would receive at the pumps if not kept up to date on preventive maintenance via set mileage limits. Emergency vehicles should be exempt from this. B. Develop a Position of Fleet Manager: Employ a person to operate and manage the FMS. This will need to be a full time employee who is capable of working with the Departments to manage a comprehensive vehicle inventory. Not only will the position manage vehicle/equipment resources, but develop standards, specifications, and review purchases of all County vehicles. This employee would also act as the chairperson for the recommended Fleet Management Advisory Committee (see item E.). The position and pay grade will be developed in cooperation with Human Resources. C. Funding: A charge-back program is recommended as the means to fund the ongoing operation of FMS and the Fleet Manager position. As vehicles depreciate over their life expectancy, a pro-rated charge back program can be established to fund the preventive maintenance and replacement of the vehicles. Pro-ration (depreciation) is to be based on a per mile or per hour of use. A five percent user fee should be added to offset inflation for future vehicle replacement costs. It is also recommended that the revenues generated from the sale of surplus vehicles be put back into this account. 10-13 DRAFT • page 4 Vehicle Replacement July 29, 1993 D. Create a Vehicle Pool: Some vehicles can be used by various departments in an effort to get the best utilization from the fewest number of vehicles. For example, a passenger van could serve multiple functions for the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors, Human Resources, etc. Pool vehicles can serve as loaners when departments have one in for repair or maintenance. Those departments or employees who do not have an assigned vehicle can now schedule use of a vehicle as an occasional user. The pool can also support departments during peak times when additional transportation is needed, i.e. Real Estate Assessment for reassessments. The fleet manager will be the coordinator and care taker of the pool vehicles. This way a schedule of use and maintenance can be managed to insure the quality and dependability of our vehicles. Standing equipment or arrangements for on-demand • rental of specialized equipment such as loaders and graders can be managed from this position. Not to mention, the value it would have in the event of an emergency. E. Fleet Advisory Committee: This could quite possibly be a standing responsibility of the Facilities Management Team or the present Vehicle Advisory Committee. The purpose of the committee would be to provide policy direction and serve as a liaison to administration and recommend the purchase and replacement of vehicles/equipment. They would also be responsible for approval or development of vehicle specifications with the input from the Departments, Purchasing, and the School Board Garage. This would insure that the vehicles would be compatible with their intended use. It would also insure. that vehicles would be purchased based on quality rather than low cost. n U ~~1 10-14 DRAFT page 5 • Vehicle Replacement July 29, 1993 F. Establish Replacement Criteria Based on Vehicle and Equipment Classifications: Certain factors must be considered when determining the replacement of a particular vehicle or piece of equipment. The following can be a set of preliminary guidelines used to evaluate the need for replacement. - safety, age, mileage, downtime, obsolescence, - acquisition cost, morale, image, function - total maintenance and operation (including fuel) - cost per mile or cost per hour for equipment - overall condition of the vehicle/equipment - available funds for replacement & operations A "decision tree" has been developed as a guideline for moving the vehicle through the replacement process. The fleet manager and the advisory committee can be the • governing body to determine if the vehicle/equipment qualifies for replacement. If for some reason a department has a vehicle that does not meet the replacement criteria they can make an appeal to the committee for early replacement or extension of the vehicle's use. It is also recommended that a vehicle be eligible for replacement when the repairs and maintenance costs are within 75% - 100% of the cost of a new vehicle. This does not include total costs of operation over the life of the vehicle such as routine preventive maintenance. VEHICLE REPLACEMENT --County Vehicles-- Vehicle Type Sedans (emergency) Sedans (non-emergency) Pick-up Trucks (all) Vans Dump Trucks (single axle) Replacement Eligibility 75,000 miles or 4 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 7 years 100,000 miles or 10 years • Specialized equipment such as an evidence van or other modified vehicle will be handled individually. V `-`I 10-15 ]7RAFT i• page 6 Vehicle Replacement July 29, 1993 The refuse trucks are considered specialized vehicles that function as equipment, yet do not totally qualify as equipment. Due to the nature of operation, the refuse collection bodies wear out before the truck chassis. Therefore, the bodies must be replaced when they become ineffective and the vehicles/chassis can be managed under the vehicle guidelines established for single axle dump trucks. --Fire and Rescue-- i• i• Vehicle Type Ambulance Crash Trucks light duty medium duty heavy duty Fire Trucks Ladder Trucks Brush Trucks Air Trucks Replacement Eligibility 60,000 miles or 6 years 100,000 miles or 15 years 100,000 miles or 15 years 100,000 miles or 20 years 12 years 15 years 15 years 75,000 miles or 5 years Note: All other vehicles such as cars are covered under emergency sedans. The Service truck is covered under the standard plan for pick-up trucks. n-1 10-16 I~ • r: i• a cn ¢~ Ew w W t~ a U c7 O co ~-+ c zoo> mmzxw x w¢a wa o a mcnw z A ~~oH w w ~ xz Foz w w m H [=7--- w >H(1.' xa a x~-,www H V]W QaC7A ~ waawz okwxoc~ w Awxaao w w woa z w U o U F U;EUO ZW cn ¢oaw w - W O WoA Fv~~ fx U C~.-•~LLW WZWw a~nHxH W W W W A O U O R Q a a ~ a UWFHn.s.aQ U UalZA xx WO H H QWFWaw Q' x xcnzwcn>az - w wxwUO HaF > >HFxUaaFHo ¢zw w¢aoz cn ~naH wzxo waHa x~~oF x ¢ UKfit~ l xw A~ o z O ~ ' a Z ~ W 7 z r - ~ Fw ~" H awx a wwa v~o a ~o ~c ~.v ¢o. a z zo W H W W V1 F U U Q ~• wxa~• wa w ~• w aowF w a0.. o a F w F ~' x Hv w ~' ~w z ~ w '" Hw iE -. xzo~: x x~x x >xF ~a >a¢a >s F F ow is aa z z z ¢mow ¢z ¢zw cnw U Q W A U H U Q A Q A w w U U a a w a w w o ~ o x z ~ z ~a ~ ~ a a a a W a a x m ~ z wa x wo¢ x F V1 wA0 W alOC7c• [/1 W w awFa FzF W ce ~ U ~ r +FAQOAF W atJ xHwAHw¢x wc~xwFZZF a >oNz~-•aHx ~-, aawAx~¢ a zF<azFHa a ~ oaaa°aoA ' z c~ H w m as O ~ AF a a o aaAH ~ z ~ Za ~ A ~a H wa a >H(/] W N a zaam ¢www w Uaxa x c. v v m ~a v~ a N O [ ~ O z •. i C z a U ~ v a¢ a v u a s v v c. a n, v r+ ~ x w xw v wa b-I 10-17 U .~ ~+ A_ 0 V C/1 "~ ~i ^~^ ~ i~l C -~ CC U " r.+ .~ A ' +.+ Uw H Cpw O O ~ ~ V1 CO •~ ~y h ~ i' v~ ~ 3 ~O N l~ O M^ '/1 M ~O 7 01 7 !~ 00 00 O O ~~~ n W O O O O O n w ~~ M Vl Vi l~ N 7 ~ M ~-• ~ O 01 ~ ~!t .. D\ V V1 00 M n O~ Vl Vt Vl O O~ W 00 M Vl h M^ ~O M V1 N (~ V^ O N 7 M l~ N V'~ M N l O 7 M W W N Q O ~O ~ ~--~ 7 l~ W N O CO l~ ~--~ M ~ ~ V1 ~ N cr1 01 00 r+1 N ~--~ .M i 7 U ' ~ ~ `~ ' 7 ~ .d r~" O ~ L .. V 1 `D h~ N^ l ~O N l 1 O O M h 0 V CO ^ M O ~ + v~ V `-' N ~^ N N^ M M^ 7 ~O N ~O N N .-. ~r ~ M O o0 7 ^ U } .-. Q g a W d M Vl o0 0o Vl 7 M o0 V'i ~ ~ ~ N ~ n D, O+ D, O ^ V'i o0 O O O O O O 7 .D ~ 00 M h V N~ a, 'n C h h h M ~n M 7 0 v-r ~D N 7 V1 O ~n O ~O ,O y ~ ~ U M M V' M O V ~O M N ~/1 N ~O 7 l~ N^ O~ M D\ N On M O N O V ~D D\ N .-. ~ 00 O W h Ol .• O b .-. D, 7 00 ~D ~ M V .-• T O 7 M 00 . + ~ O N o0 D, n 7 M CO R O l~ ~ 7 l~ O a0 D\ M M N M M ~ 7~~ V MO ~O ~D M N M N O 01 h Vl 7 O l~ `O h C 7^ Vl M~ O :~ O ^^ ~ O~ 00 00 OO 00 ~D ~D ~O Vl V1 V1 V'1 V'1 V V 7 V N N N .• ~ T d V ~ N A OO OO 000000 00 0000 0000 0000 000000000000000000000000 0 ~p oo,rnvo,va,vo~vrnvrnvrnvo.vo,vo,~n O 01 V n V O r M O \O M 01 ~O N O~'/~ N W h o0 ~o ~ +~- A O ~/i T l~ M O h M O h M O ~O M O ~D M O ~D M Vl O O ~ V' ~n 7 M ^ O ~ r ~ ~ M N ^ O+ oo r ~ 7 O O [~ l~ ~ O N 7 l~ l~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ h V1 h v1 h R N O H N ^ M ~ z o ~ ~ ~o~ ~a vaO ~. ' ~ a a~ H z ~ oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o > ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z q F7 --~ ~ O~ oo h~ V1 V M N ~--~ O~~ r~~ V tT1 N ~ O 7 U O (7 r-~ ~ n '/i M DD ~ V N O ao ~ V N ^ T l~ Vi M ~-- ~ O O O O O O~ 01 ~ T 01 0o W o0 a0 00 l~ !~ ~ n O ~ ~ N ~ _ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O D, O ~/1 O ~/1 O V'1 O ~n O Vl O Vt O ~/1 O '/t O V1 O h O ~ ~^ O N Vl h O N V1 l~ O N V1 ~ O N '/t n O N '/t n V1 ~ ~ ~.r O ~O (V ~ ~/1 ~--~ l~ M O ~O N a0 Vi ~--~ ~ M O ~ N ~ r Q [~ fw/] "'~ ea O Q. Q+ 00 W DD n r ~ ~ ~ Vt Vl h7. 7. 7. M M N .-. ~--i .r .-. .-. .-. .-. ..+ ... .-. .. .-. .r N !. V M ~ r-a N b9 ~ ~ O O o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o ao 7 ~ 7 D\ 7 D, 7 O+ d' O+ ~ O~ 7 01 7 O+ 7 O~ V D, O ~ ~ d .-. ~~ x 4ir h~ N 7 n O n N 7 r O~ N 7 l~ 01 N 7 l~ O n N 7 D\ h N W 7 0 h M 01 Vi N a0 7 0 l~ M D\ V'1 N W ~O ~O ~O vl Vt vt et V M M M N N N^^ 0 0 0 T 7 N ~ ~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N^ ~D aa.~~.. M 3 a M 7 69 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~n O ~/1 O ~/'1 O v1 O Vi O Vi O ~n O ~/1 O ~/1 O ~/1 O O ~^ O N Vl l~ O N '/t l~ O N V1 l~ O N Vl l~ O N Vl n V'1 ~' O ~ O ~ N DD Vi ^ 1~ M O ~ N ~ ~ ^ h N1 O b N DO O~~ 00 00 W h r b~ Vl V1 h~ 7~ M M N ~ ~ ~ a i ^ .-. .. .--~ .-. .. .-. r. .ti ~--~ .--i .. . -i N V ~ ~ M N 69 w b N~ O M^ vt M ~D V 01 7 1~ a0 DD 0 0 T a~ N O O O O O O h ' O M ~/t Vl M 1~ O. 7 00 b V1 7~~ O b~~ O M W N Vl O V1 h O 7 b a0+ ~ O O a, 00 ~O a\ ^ 7 01 [~ M a\ N oo M h l~ aD O M a, ~ V1 N [~ O O N O 00 ~--~ 7 7 00 l~ V C' h O N~ ^ D\ O~~ --~ 7 M 7 N ~ 7 A V (~ [~ n V l~ O N W M V1 ~O .N. O D\ b~ O~ O^ ~ M v V~ N N O n^ ^ N^ M M 7 ~O N ~/t M O ~ Q ~ A ... ~--i .-. DD o A a y l~ M V1 O O h ~O '/t O [~ ^ [~ a0 7 l~ Q\ ^^ N M h 0 0 0 O O 0 0 ^ _ U '^' 7~ M a0 V1 h W 7 ~D Q` 00 N h 00 ^ O er O^ O ~O l~ ~n O O Vl O ^ N^ O \O l~ V t~ O N O ~ N ~~ j L M M M 7 00 00 ~O N N 7^ N 01 O ~O ~ 1 i 7 l~ N l~ O Q~ l~ 00 l~ Vi ~D ~D 01 Oi O Oi O 7 7 7 D M N +1 N ~ 'n m ~ ~ N l~ N Vl 7 N M 01 ~ l~ Vl M M M l~ N M 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ O M DD DD ~ Vl ~ ~ M N O ~ [~ 7 ^ O ~ Vt 0\ ao ~ ^ O 0 0 ' 1 ' ~ ~ ~ 1 7 O .p N QUA ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W O 0 0 V 1 V V V 1 V1 V V V R M M .--~ l l l `' V N ~ p 07N 00M o0 No0 N ooN oD NOON DD N00 N00 N1~0000000 ' o ~ ~ 7 t '~ Obi O N ~ ^ V o N /1 ~ 7 ~ M l 1 O V O~ M M .fir ^ ~O O O M 7 \O h W O .• tYl 7 b [~ 01 O N M 7 \O l~ 01 M O ~ ^ (~ ~O. R W N ~O O 7 D\ M r h~ M a0 N~ O C 00 N h Q O G Q 00 O ~O M T ~O N 00 Vl ^ 00 V O h M 0 ~O M~~ N ~ 7 N .-• .-. O O O D, O~ D, 00 m o0 1~ n ~ ~ b vl vt vi h h ~ V] .-. .-. .-. .-. .-» .-. ~ P. Q+ ~ W ~O ^ Vi W ~n l~ O~ D\ O O M O^ 7 N ~D 7 ~/1 M^ 0 0 0 O O 0 0 l~ nU- W Q\ a0 O n --~ M o0 N O~ O~ V^ ~n ^ W M ~/1 m M O~ O~ '/t O 4w ^ O l~ ^ M Vl ^ On 7^ M O V1 N O~ W O N^ Vl O h Vt N l~ O v 7 M ~ ~ V1 ~O n 7 M vi W O~ N .-• 01 W N 7 ~D N vi ~D ~+i V O~ .• ~ V [~ C M M^ M ~O W vt N Ol ~~~ N h N [~ `"~ M ^ N ~D N N o0 ^ N^ N N 7 ~h ^ V M O ~ o .~ .~ .~ o0 U EQ U ~p h O+ M N h O+ V h f O~ D, ~ b~~^ O+ M~ 7^ 0 0 O O 0 0 O O l~ N b 7 V ~D ~D ~ ~D M 7 ~--~ 0 7 7 ~/1 O '/t M V1 ~O m Vl Vt O O Vl O M M M N D\ c+1 N M DO h M M m~~ [~ n 7 N [~ l~ Vl O N O ^ N ~ V7 ~ P U 7 W~ Vi O r^ M 7 .-• O, O N O V1 01 ~D O V .-• l~ ~O 01 O~ O V ' o0 N L N Q ~ M V 1 (~ V' N 01 N M DD ~~ M V \O 01 M D\ N 01 N~ M~ M~ ¢ O 00 ~O T l~ V't 7 ~D Vt M M O Ow ~ M M M o0 M N ~ ~ D\ N D O ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . -i 00 t~ l~ ~O ~O ~O ~D 7 7 V 7 7 7 M M M M M N .. C U O N y N O O h~ N h 7 M V i ^ O D, h N l~ D\ M~ 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 ' ' M N T y W et''7 T 00 ~O o0 T V 1 ~D 00 N N 00 O V1 N N N O V1 v1 O O V 1 O vi ~ M O M O ~n vi N ~/1 [~ 7 N a, 7 M vi 7 N ~O O l~ n~ O N O N ^ O G .G '^ ~ ~ D; W Vl W N l~ M ~ n r h o0 M n ~ Oi l~ Vi N ~ D; O D; O 7 ' O~ M a y F, Q ~ O h~ n~ n O~ M N O D\ n~ V^ O^ V M N Ni M~ M M h ~n M O~ 01 h l~ vl 7 V 7 7 M M r+l M M M O~ ~--~ M Vi Q U ~ et V 7 M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N^^^^ ~--~ ^^^^ ~O V'1 D\ N N O O N O R~ 7 00 ~O l~ 00 T~ 7 ~D U ^~ 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 V y ~D O N t~ O O Vt h~ V ~O N M N T O~ N O M oo l~ On DD O O N M l~ O~ l~ O M^ M M^^ M V1 a0 N D\ O 00 ~ ,~ h DD N n Vl T D, Vl O~ N M n N N E n Vl Vl D, U Q ~ N c~+1 N 01 l~ ~ ~ ^ O 0~1 ~ n ~ ~ OM O O O ~ ^ ~ M n ~ ~ M M N N N N N N^^^^^^^^^ T M O ', 'i, Yi ~O l~ W ~ ^ N M 7 vl ~O l~ oo T O ^ N_ M 7 Vl ~O !~ a0 O~ O ^ N M D, T Q\ O+ D\ N O O O O O O O O O ^ ^ N N N N I .: N M 7 V1~0 h o0 O~ O .: N r1 V Vi ~D 1~ a0 T O 7 vi ~D l~ o0 01 O .: N _ _ 01 T D\ O, O~ D\ O O O O O O 0 0 0 O N N N D\ ~ 01 T O+ D\ 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ ^^^^ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N "'' >Y m 111 0 r (`~ a O N 11-1 ~ d u C ~ y H ~ ~ A_ A d O y7, O ~ ~". w V 4r ~ O N O u y R d ~ ~~ E ~ ~ ~ ~. CQ ~ ~ d 3 ~l1 M M N V --~ V ~O l~ 00 O O O O O 00 ~~ t+l ~/1 V ~D N N~ O GO M ~n _ [~ v'i O t~ O ~n O O~ N ~ V O~ M O O~ O~ N l~ ~O oo t~ 7 ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~+ O ~O B O O o0 41 7 00 T M O ~ V N D\ O o0 [~ 7 N M 00 n ~ a~ l~ N ~ ~ 7 O~ N M ~n l~ ~n ~n o0 Q~ N ~O M O O~ ~ ~--~ <Y O l~ ~ ~y ~ '~ Q~ N ~t ~ 7 t~ ~n ,-. ~n 7 7 ~O N O Q~ oo ~O l~ v~ ~n .-. ~O O O ~} V ~ ~ -~ ~ N --~ --~ M N o0 N ~D N N M N G O U C V M c d c d dQa w ' ~ 000000000000000000000000000000 0 y oao~n vi ~n ~n v~~n v~~n ~n ~n ~n vi ~n ~n ~n v~~n viva 00 ~ Q y O O~ V1 \O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O ~ O V1 M l~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 00 7 0 C Q r . O O o0 0o DD o0 oD o0 00 00 00 00 0o aD oo aD oo m o0 00 00 0o O O O O O O O O Obi ~ ~ ~ ~ O r M O ~ M ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ O U1 ~ [~ M O (~ M O l~ M O ~O M O ~O M O ~O M ~n O l~ iC Q~ O ~O V ~n V M ~--~ O O~ [~ ~D ~n M N O~ aD r~ V O O ~ [~ O ~ ~ n v~vi7N N 7l~t~l~[~t~[~~O ~O ~O ~O ~D ~D ~O ~n vi F, ~ M z~ r p ~_ o~ 'r" C d ~ O O ~ V] 69 y y z a+ n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d ~~ O~ 00 n~~ V M N ~--~ O O~ DD n~ ~ V M N~ ' ~ O O i ~ M O ? V 1 oo D ~ ct N ~ r N M ~--~ O V N ~ O 7 (7 .-7 ~ ~ ~ 01 O O O O O O~ Q~ O~ O~ 01 00 00 00 00 DD n [ '. .--i ,-. ,--i .-~ ~ m .-1 a .a 7 w N ~ ~O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ O~nOV~O V-,O ViO ~n O~nOViO V'iO ~n O~n O r C -. O N E l~ O N ~n l~ O N ~n [~ O N E l~ O N ~n l~ ~n 7 ~ x O~ O W N oO vi ~--~ n M O ~D N oo ~~ n M O ~O N o0 01 00 00 W [~ l~ l~ ~D ~O V't V1 Vl 7 ~ 7 M M N O Q l~ 00 ~ U a M ~ N 6 9 ~ O. O a0 00 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 DD o0 00 00 00 CD op 00 W o0 DD O ~ ~ 70~70~7017 Q~ V O~~0~7O~7 Q~7 O~ V O~ ~D V1 [ /~~• r~ a ~ [~~N7l~O~N 7 nQ~N V I~O~N 7l~O~N7 ~ ~ N a0 7 O l~ M O~ vi N ~ R O l~ M O~ vi N ~ V N Z _ ~O ~O ~O Ul Vl ~ V V M M M N N N O O O Qi NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~--~ 00 ~O Y 3 ~ M ~ M 69 '~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O~ Ov1O ViO VSO V~O~nOVi O ~nOViO ViO~ O G' .-. cC ~d x O N ~n l~ O N ~n l~ O N ~ n O N ~n l~ O N E l~ O ~O N o0 vi ~--~ l~ M O ~O N ~ ~ ~ ~ M O ~D N ~ '~1 n O O ~ D\ o0 oO o0 l~ l~ l~ ~O ~O v~ v~ ~n V V 7 M M N o0 U ~ M N 69 ~' 00 --~ 7 l~ Vl V' ~O N N o0 O W M ~n M M N V ~--~ 7 ~D [~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 V ~O o0 v'i 7 7 l~ N M N O V l~ O Q V'1 ~O c .9 O ~ 7 M i N~ ~~ 0~~~[~7~00 Vi ~n OHO [~OO~~D ~O Vi~~--~0~ [~ '~ ~ nN--+~,--~~D;ON oo7N~7~O OOMO~I~~O ,-:N l~ . -+ O~ N •--~ 7~~ M O V N M V'l ~-+ 01 00 ~O ~n vl M 7 0 N M N ~~ Q V~ M N ~ ~--~ ~ N -+ ~ N N ~ N~ U v N M N ~ Q a C) L1 d ~nM70MO0 V o0~ V ~~oo ~n Ole V No0nMn0000000 aD C O ,d ~ ~~~~~OO V OM~OVi O1 ~--~v~~n~n~N [~~'O1M7oo ~-.~OO~MOO [~OMN M~~7OQ~ N ^~ Y ~~ r~~ ~ n vl O O O ~ Oi 7 N ~--~ ~O O l~ [~ O 7 N ~ 'O C ti O N ~ .~ ~ CQ M M v~ V O~ V o0 7 7 O. ~D M aD n n~ N ~ O n N N } N o0 7 '. DD ao [~ .--i O a0 a0 ~ 7 M O l~ l~ ~O ~O l~ [~ ~ ~--~ h 1p %p^ ~ Q M M 7 7 M M M M M N N N N N N~ ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~ d Q N ~ O aO Nao N OON[~0000000 eY N OO MOONODN~NOON OO N 7 w Vl b _ M l~ ~--~ ~D O ~n O1 'C o0 M n N~ ~ O V Q~ M a0 N ' ~ M O ~ q ~~~ ~O l~ DD O ~--~ M 7 ~O l~ O~ O N M ~ ~D [ Qi O ^+ M <} ~D V A N ~O O 7 Q~ M l~ ~--~ vi 01 M W N b O V o0 N O ~ a ,.. ""' a0 O b M 01 ~ N 00 V1 ~--~ 00 7 O l~ M O ~O M Q~ V'1 N ~/1 ~ pp ~ 7 N ~--~ ~--~ O O O O~ O~ O~ 00 00 00 [~ t~ [~ ~D ~O v'i vi v'i ~ ~ 69 py M V [~ONOOON~O aD 00bNTa1 D\n o0 o0 l~ao ~--~OOOOOOO N p ~O ~ oo v-, l~ O ~ O o0 '. M D\ O N D\ 00 00 ~--~ ~O ~n oo O ~ a '~"' o0 ~--~ O [~ O oo m ~ n N M ~ --~ 00 O~ ~--~ O l 00 ~D v1 N O~ ~ QI Q A 7 N ~ O -i ~O vi N Vi Oi m 7 ~D v 00 ~O vi o0 O M l M -~ O v'1 ~O ~--' Q~ ~ ^ ^ N O ~O O O~ ~ n ~ ~ M ~--~ N O --~ ~ N _ N N ~O ~ ^-~ ^-~ N N Do C Q R 'O ~ O~ N NOON O ~t ~O ~ 00 ~ n ao ~ ~ 7 ~O 01 ~--~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 S O N [~ O O Vi ~~ 7 ~O N M N O~ Q~ N O M aD ~ N l~ 01 DD O O N M l~ 01 l~ O M ~-+ M M ~--~ ~--~ M Vl 00 N O '~ d ~00NC~~n O~O~~nO7NM~.--~NNO, ,-•t~vi vi Q\ O t ~ ~ ~ M ~ V1 l~ \O ~ ~"' ^ N V ~ V1 M ~ O Vl .-~ O ~ ~ \O Vl Q' N M N D\ r [~ [~ ~--~ O Q\ ~ n ~ v~ M O O O O~ ~--~ ~-+ l~ Q ~(~~ " MMMNNNNNN-~-~-~--~--~--~...~.-~.-r M 0 0 v1 lp l~ W 01 O ~--i N M V ~/l ~O l~ 00 Q1 O -~ N_ M 7 ~n ~O l~ GD D\ O ~--~ N M 01 CT 01 O~ 01 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --+ ~--~ ~ ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ ~~ ~--~ N N N N ~ v~ ~D [~ a0 Q~ O -~ N cn ~ v~ ~O l~ oo O~ O -~ N 7 v~ ~O l~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N m V O~O~O~O~O~Q~0000000000 NNN O~ Q~ O~ O~ O~ O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --~ --~ --~ -~ --~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N "` ` Y m W v M Q O U N 11-2 D--I M C~ V V ..~ A O U O .,~ 'O ~~~~ N oQv~ -p U C ca d N ~L ~ y ~~~~~ Q U Q ~ N Q~ •--~ M o0 ~ ~n M ~ oo ~ .-~ ~ N ~ v'~ c0 ~ CO ~ O O O O O O O O N '.. ~ O N~ M~ O~ M~~ M ON N~ O oN0 O N~~ N O t~ ~ N r O ~ (~ O ~--~ N l~ vi ~t ~ ~O oo O N ~O ~n ~O O1 0o N ~--~ ri v'i cri ~ .-~ ~ ri ~t ~O N ~--~ M ,--i N M ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~--i ~ N O ~--~ O l~ O~ N l~ ~ M~ ~--~ O O~ l~ N [~ ~ M~ 0 0 0 O O O O O O M 00 ~ ~ O~ 00 ~ 00 O~ ~n ~O oo N N o0 O ~n N N .~ N O ~ ~ O O v'~ O N ~n d~ M O M O ~n ~n N v~ l~ ~ N O~ ~t M ~n ~ N ~O O l~ ~ ~n O N O ~--~ ~O Oi O~ 00 ~ 00 N ~ cri ~D ~ l~ vi 00 M l l O~ l~ V'~ N ~O O~ O O~ O ~ O~ O~ O~ a1 [~ (~ ~ O 00 M N O O~ [~ ~O ~ ~--~ O ~--~ ~ M N N M N M M M [~ h- M ~ O\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M M 41 ~--~ •--~ •--~ •--~ ,--~ •--~ ,--~ ,--~ V) ~ 'd' ~ M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~O 0 ~ ~O l~ 00 O~ O .--i N M ~' V'~ ~ ~ 00 O~ O ^-~ N M ~ ~ ~O l~ 00 O~ O .--i N M O~ O~ C~ O~ O~ N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-~ •--~ ~--~ ~--~ --~ ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ ~-+ ~--~ N N N N d' V') ~ (~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N M ~ ~n ~O [~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N M ~ ~n ~O l~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N Q1 Q~ O~ d1 Q1 d1 O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~--~ '--~ ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ ,-~ ~--~ ~--~ ~---~ N N N Q~ 01 O~ Q~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ .-~ ~--~ ~--~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N >Y F-' m W ~' c+~ a 0 a~ O M O 11-3 Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale o-f The County School Board and the County Board of Supervisors approved the application to the VPSA for the following projects to be financed with the Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale. Ft. Lewis Elementary - A&E work $100,000 New South County High School - A&E work /site development 1,500,000 Major renovations at various County schools 4,000,000 Northside gym /auditorium 3,500,000 South county stadium renovations 1,000,000 $10,100,000 The County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to hold a public hearing and to consider the adoption of a resolution to approve this borrowing on March 28, 1995. The funds are currently scheduled to be available from the VPSA on May 11, 1995. 03/07/95 DEBT/VPSA1995.WK4 11-4 o-~ 0 Qa 0 0 .. C~ O "O FBI r.+ O z N .~ 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 M ~!1 M ~ 6N4 6M4 69 .-+ 6r4 O ~ U Q ~ Q ~ ~ .~ c~ O O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ 3 on ~ ~ o ~ bA bA . ~ ~ b ~ ~ i-r + .,.., ..r ~ c C ~ .a ~ v~ vi ~ ~ ~ cC ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ O -~ c+C + U > O O O O ~ ~ U U N ~ U U U ~ p U ^ bA ~ .-. b0 ~ U O .. ~ ''' xi L". ~ ~ O ~ +--~ U U ~ ~~ ;~ ;~+ O b~A O .. Q O O `~ ~ ~ 'b O 'r" o ~ O U ~ ~ v d ~ a Q ~¢ a v ~ ~ ~' , ~ ~ a~ > ;~ „ ~ > ~ ~ a~ 3 U ~ ~ U w _ C7 N Z 11-5 .~~ Y n f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION 31495-7 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR CERTAIN SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing certain improvements or expansions to the Cave Spring Junior High School ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to es ";>':'>:~?i'>€~iC~>`<~~ ~:~~~~~#~~ made or to be made by reimburse advanc D:~:;::.: ::::::::::::::::;.::::::::::.>:::::::::::..~,~..::::::.>::,::~:.;:.;:.;:<:::;< the County to pay tfie ~cos~s ~~ of```~acqurrig,~ constructing, equipping and developing the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Project is $2,500,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution amended that reimbursement not exceed $500,000, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke A COPY TESTE: ...~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Frank E. Thomas, Chairman, School Board Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools ~-- FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL HOARD OF RO1~iOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON MARCH 9, 1985 IN THE HOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION $OILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. REQUEST FOR AN ADVANCEMENT OF $500,000 BY THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTX f'OR R$NOVATTONS TO CAV$ SPRxNC~ JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. wHEREAS, the County School. Hoard of Roanoke County has proposed xenovating Cave Spring Junior High School at an approximat® cant of $2, 500, 000 for whioh Literary fw7.dittg has been approved with an availability date of November 1995, e-nd WHEREAS, certain reriovat~,ons are planned for the summer of 1995, including the ~.ristallation of an elevator, wh~.ah are neae,asary to comply with regulations of the Americans With Disabilities Act; HE IT RESOLVED that tihe school. board requests an advancement of $500,000 from the 9aard of Supervisors of ~toanoke County, until Literary funds are received iri November 1995, to facilitate Commencement of the renovations planned fox Che Summer of 1995 . Adopted on mota.on of Maurine T,. Mitchell, duly seconded, and on the fallowing recorded vote: AYES: Maurice L. Mitchell, Michaol W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank ~. ThomAs NAYS: None AASENT: Thomq;e A. Leggette TESTE: a--«n~-• Clerk c : Mrs . Diane Fiyatt Mra. Penny Hodge ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER r'° ""' l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request from School Board to Approve a Reimbursement Resolution for Renovations to Cave Spring Junior High School COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On July 23, 1991, the Board of Supervisors approved application for Literary Loans in the amount of $2.5 million for building improvements at Cave Spring Junior High School. Based on the current status of Literary Loan funds, it is anticipated that state funding for this project will be available in the fall of 1995. The School Board wishes to proceed before that time because some of the improvements will need to be made during this summer and the remaining items completed during the summer of 1996. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a resolution dated February 9, 1995 from the School Board asking the Board of Supervisors to advance funds in anticipation of the $2.5 million borrowing. The School Board has determined that they can proceed with an advance of $500,000 at this time. At their meeting on March 9, 1995, the School Board adopted a resolution requesting an advance of $500,000 for their work on Cave Spring Junior High School over the summer months. There has been some discussion by the Board and School Board as to whether this project could be postponed pending construction of a new Cave Spring High School. With the schedule anticipated for construction of the new high school, the School Board and administration prefer not to wait because the high school is not likely to be complete until around the year 2000. The high school project is progressing as planned which is summarized below: 1. Acquisition of land 2. Geological work, engineering and architectural design 3. School administration review of existing facilities to determine the impact on these facilities. 4. Development of a financing plan. This project is ongoing but not expected to be completed for the next 18 - 24 months. Construction will take an additional three years. This information will be reviewed with you and the School Board during the joint work session which will be held prior to a decision on this request. I realize that this is a complex issue which might be postponed in light of the plans for the new high school. However, I support the school's request to go forward with the air conditioning and modification to Cave Spring Junior High School. The improvements will be of use to the County until the new high school is completed and plans can be made for other uses of the building. If there are no other school or county uses for the facility, I would like to consider using it for a business incubator. Staff has recently received information from the State that in the event the governing body transfers ownership of any property financed by literary loans, the balance of th Literary Loan must be paid before title can be transferred. FISCAL IMPACT If the Board chooses to proceed with the junior high school renovations at this time, the current cash flow picture of the County could accommodate an advance of $500,000 for this project. Attached for your information is a schedule of combined debt service which shows the impact of all currently authorized borrowing (Schedule #1). The schedule shows that combined debt service for county and schools will result in $175,998 savings for the current year if no additional bonds are sold. However, the Board has already authorized $10.1 million in VPSA bonds to be sold this spring. The public hearing for the sale of these bonds will be held at the March 28 board meeting. Items included in the Spring 1995 bond sale are shown on Schedule #2. When these bonds are sold, the resulting debt for the year being budgeted (1995-96) will require an increase of $310,036. The Cave Spring Junior High School request for $2.5 million is one of a number of projects already authorized by the Board but not yet issued. Please note that with the issuance of funds for the junior high school, the 1996-97 debt service will increase an additional $671,952 over the 1995-96 debt service. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I recommend approval of this request to advance up to $500,000 to begin work on the Cave Spring Junior High renovations. The attached resolution will need to be adopted in order to allow the County to be reimbursed from the Literary Loan proceeds. ~„~N.. Elm r C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, March 14, 1995 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR CERTAIN SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing certain improvements or expansions to the Cave Spring Junior High School ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Project is $2,500,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. m:\finance\common\board~-14-95a.res March 13, 1995 O W ~O Q (D Q d O W A v m W .C-~ A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~-` ~-' O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ~O ~O ~D ~O ~O ~O N N N r r ~-' ~-' O O O O O O O 0 0 O ~O ~O ~D ~D ~O `D N r 0 ~D ~ ~1 O~ V~ A W N r 0 ~O oo J O+ v~ A W N r 0 ~D Oo J O~ ~n A N N N N .-~ .-~ r ~-' ~ ~-' O O O O O O O O O N ~O ~O ~O ~D ~D W N ~+ O ~O 0o J O1 In A W N r 0 ~D 00 J O~ to A W N O ~D 0o J~ U O ~O W .+ .-~ .+ .+ r .+ .-~ «-~ .-~ N N N N N N W W W w N n J N ~O 0 0 O W to a, J ~O b O r J J J ~O N I W ~ ry ~' to ~p n A O~ J J O r to O Q\ W U U A l.n .- A~ J to to J r ~O N N .+ J W N A O to ~O ~O In J N 00 J ~~ ~ O O N 00 In W r .-~ W W .-~ W O J ~O J W IJ 0 0 00 ~O J A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ ~O T A N S oho J T Oo A OA1 A O N O O N N lO0 U ~, a O~ .-. .-. .+ .-~ .- .- .-~ .-~ .-+ N N N N N N N N N N N W W W W A A A ~~ o C In ~ ~--~ V ~ ~ y V "~„~, ~D W W W W W W A??? U ~l J ~O ~O W U J '~' S W ~D W W N W N N W A r 0 A O~ J ~D O N W oo O J J J ~O to O ~O A O ~D O ~O T N to J ~O J J W Oo to J J D\ W J N W U Oc ~ b D, ~ ti ~ .+ Q ? in W A ~O N? J U N in ili O W O W? V~ O IJ O in J J O T N ~ N N W _ O to 0 0 ll~ In O N N N Vi O 0o N N Oo D\ l.n ~D 0o O+ Oo ~O A A 00 O O D 0 0 O O O O U W ~O J N J ~D O r In W A J N ~O J O ~-' O N N C C1 o o c 01 .+ .+ r+ r .-~ .-~ ~-+ ~+ N W W W W W A A A A A A Oi D\ ~ D\ J J 00 _ ~ O V ~ V rn~ O N o O D O~ N W 0o W W W 01 ~O O ~-' W W in T A in J .•+ ~•-~ .+ w N ~O N A J `+ Vi W a ~~~ ~D ao W W N W N N ~O N ~D W ~O 01 A W a J 0o D O ~O O~ J r A 0~~ U O N O ~D r A W ~-+ J O U N 0o A V A O ('1 N N_ J j O N O In J J N A V J C~ U 00 W W V 0o W N W ~O N W ~-' W W O in O O to In oo O~ In W V~ O In A A O r A W O~ 0o Q\ T A A 0 0 0 O O O O O ~-` A ~O W ~O ~-' in T O~ ~O ~O ~O Oo J A ~O J N W ~O J N N Q• C Q d n O ~ O W in ~ N N ~-' N_ r 0o N N ~ N J N J N~~ J ~O N U W 01 W W W A J W r. n W ~ ~ 0 a A _ O A W D\ U N M A N 00 ~ ~-' N~ W U W A J D\ U A W ~-` ~ » "h W A J D U W ~-' J O .-~ ~D O ~l N in V O U r N O 00 ~O N In O W A Oin in OtnO W oo ~n woo in ~-' AiD OO+O Noo w~--~ J Ooo ~D 0 0 0 O O O O ~-' W U A O~ N A ~--~ O W O O ~O ~O J to Oo In ~ W d ~ ~ J .-. .-~ .-. ..+ .-~ .-~ U U U Oi O~ J J J Oo 0o ao ~O ~O ~D G O O r N A ~ ~. ~ VJ ~~ O D to J N to ~O W O~ O W J O A 00 In 0o N O~ ~D W O~ O 00 N Oo A O O~ N Oo W ~O to .-' J W j 0 A O O~ N ao A O~ ~"~ A W r ~O A W I ~ V Q . W O ~ ~ y b '~ C ~y S O W ~-` O Oo J~ J O O ~ P ~ D J N Oo W ~O A O in ~-' D\ N J W Oo A ~D to 0 O~ r J W ~, U Q A 0 0 0 O O O O J N Oo N 0o N oo N 0o N 0o N 0o N 0o N 0o W 0o N A O d (~ a p ~ O a .-• .+ W W A A A A A to In In to Vi J J J Oo Oo Oo 00 W O D i ~ W i O O O ~ r a d O li o 0o n ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ in ~ O .•• A ~] oo O N :+ :-• :+ A In N J A A W ~ . O 7 to to W W N W N A to .- N J W W W U J A ~D W N A O ~D O ~O ~O Oi 01 In J 00 J ~D O J N J A W oo N W N W~ A A W y ~ ~~ G N O IJ O U V 01 O N 0o O~ ~] O ~O N r A N N O~ 00 0o A W W W t W A a p. ~ In .-~ o ao 00 O to 0 0 to J~ O ~-' O A O r Oo J N Oo ~O O~ A Oo J O O O O O O O J W N ~-' ~-` ~-' `D J A 0o J ~-' J O in ~ J O O U W J ~ ~ ~ O . '_ a ~ y f° 0o O W r .. ~-' ~ N O~ A W~ N ~-' ~O N N Q` A W O D\ O U~~ O N~ U W W N O J A J J J W~ ' °~ ~, y C O N y A ~ A W ~-` ~O D\ O~ ~--' ~-' W N O J A A J Oo A A r 0o O N .-~ O y u W O J N ili J ~O W O 00 ~l J W 0o N ~D W J~ A ~--~ ~~ OG i0 C O "" d A J O in to O In N oo W O ~O A O\ O Q\ E A U .-` a Oo A b J W U U W O O O O O O J 01 ~O ~O O O 0o Oo J A ~O A 01 W to r ~+ W O U N D ,..~ ~ W N 0o ' .-..-~ .-. .....-~ .' .. r r N N W W A A A Vi In In 01 D\ J J J Oo 00 00 ~O ~O O 69 in ~'" e.i (~ ~ rr fn O J 0o N Q\ O W j l r in 0o N D\ O W J r U 0o N 01 O I N O J i I O i I In O O J n J O n J n J in N O J U N O J '..~ O In O U O to O In O U O to O in O tl~ O In O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~O Vi 69 W ~.y W A O~ .-~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~O O O O r r N N N W W W A A U U '~ Oi 01 O~ ~ aJ 00 N oo N In ~O W J O A ao N to j0 W J O A Oo N to ~O x A. ~. ~ A ~ ? N ~D J A N ~O ~l A tJ ~D J A N ~D J A N ~D J ~ A b A~ A~ A~ A~ A~ A~ A~ A~ A ~ ~ '9 O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Oo Oo 00 00 00 00 Oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O O~ W N N W W A A A In to In ~ 01 J J J 00 0o Oo ~O ~D O N ~rx D J Oo N T O W J ~-' U 0o N 01 O W J -' to Oo N T O y ~ tli J in N O J In N O J U N O J i.n N O J U N O r 7 S O O to 0 V~ O lIi O In O In O in O U O In O Vi O U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~p J Q yq N N A K ~ 6 'y * W N J J J J Oo 0o Oo Oo 00 ~O ~O ~O ~O ~D O O O O O ~O r~ ~ O N A O~ 0o O N A D\ oo ~... W 4i J ~D r W to J ~O ~-• N W A i Q J 0 ~ O ~ V w. N~ ' Z O O n ~ 0 O IJ W A in O~ ~l W O O ~--~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C ~p M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J _ Z N d,r~ N ~ ~~ °r"C) a O Uj ~ o ~ x cn '° ~ W ,~ ~ ~ O J J N A lli In In lli In ~ 01 O+ D\ T 0\ ~ J J_ J J J J A N O O A to J 00 ~O N W in D` J ~O O W A to A T O O In W 01 O W O\ O W T O W J O W J O W J ~D 4i O O ^ d~ r (G A oo~ in oo lJ in iON O~~Dw O,O W ~1 O?mil ADO O.~ D\ O U~ A~ A~ A~ A ~O A ~O A ~O A ~O A ~O A ~D ~O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O ~ ~ n O ~• .-•.-~.-•.~.~ NNNA AA Ato to to In to Q, P T 000000 oo ~O OO W N W T O O W (7 ? A i Q V O A i ~ \ O ~ Wi ~ ~ ~ O ~D n \ n ~ 7 O N n --~ --~ 00 W A J ~D Oo N O W W N W W ~O 00 O J A D\ J O v ~ 0o B A O~Dr AwN D\oo AiD .-~a1 O bJOOO oo T N ~O O~~ ~ 7 P W O N O W ~O IJ ~D W 0o O IJ ~ A~ N U N W O\ A O W A W W . n~ ~ Q\ A O U O In A N~ U O A W U W J J J A In ~D 00 N A J W 00 000000 oo to OHO ~O ~D Jin N D\U ~ U oo W AU o0 oo v~ w N a ~, b a r= 00 .-. r r O W ~ 7 b w O W ~ N N T N Q~ A ~-` W W N N ~-` ~O N .-. A 0 0 to J N 01 J ~-' N A J 01 In O W Oo A O~ ~ W~ ~ ~' ~ CJ A ~ A W N W 00 ~O W N In to N tli W r J 0o O N GD J A r N T O C7 y y~ N W A J O J N W In tJ J W A N O ~--~ ? J IJ il~ W O~ .+ W J il~ W 0o Oo ~O O O In U U ~D J W 00 In A ~O .-~ U A ~D O D\ W ~D A N J U U W OOOOOOO J D\~ ~OOOO ooJ ADD Aa` W to r r W O Jv~ ~ ' ~ ~c a ~ ~~ ~ A ~ K ~ I~ h ~ ~. C A ~ ~ ~. M FN y C O ~ A y ~ A CS' r !'? Schedule 2 Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale The County School Board and the County Board of Supervisors approved the application to the VPSA for the following projects to be financed with the Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale. Ft. Lewis Elementary - A&E work New South County High School - A&E work /site development Major renovations at various County schools Northside gym /auditorium South county stadium renovations $100, 000 1,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 1,000,000 10.100.000 The County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to hold a public hearing and to consider the adoption of a resolution to approve this borrowing on March 28, 1995. The funds are currently scheduled to be available from the VPSA on May 11, 1995. 03/09/95 DEBT/VPSA1995.WK4 O~ ROA/yO~tt' .a .P L ~ .~ z ~ ~ _ ~ ' d. 1838 OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 5937 COVE ROAD. N.W. ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24019 Mr. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County 5204 Bernard Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear "Fuzzy": Cc •. Cam-' February 14, 1995 Enclosed is a resolution adopted by the Roanoke County School Board on February 9, 1995 regarding the renovations to Cave Spring Junior High School. Inasmuch as Literary funding will be available for this project in November 1995, the school board and administration strongly feel that renovation should begin in the summer of 1995. This, of course, would necessitate advanced funding by the board of supervisors until the Literary funds are received. We are requesting that the board of supervisors include the enclosed resolution on your earliest possible meeting agenda for discussion and action. As always, we are appreciative of the support you and your fellow board members give to the school division. Sincerely, ~ ~ „ ~ {/~~1~1~~ Frank E. Thomas, Chairman Roanoke County School Board FET:rcw c: Mr. Elmer Hodge FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADVANCE FUNDING FOR RENOVATIONS TO CAVE SPRING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County is committed to educational excellence which includes providing the most advantageous surroundings which will ensure that students are participating in a quality learning atmosphere, and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School has not been renovated to provide for air conditioning, elevator and other ADA improvements, updated electrical requirements, updated classroom lighting, improved lockers, auditorium upgrade, etc., and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School is the only school in the school system which will not be air conditioned by the year 1997, and WHEREAS, the County School Board has expended $109,372 on architectural and engineering plans which are ready to be implemented as soon as funding is available for construction, and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for construction to be completed over two summers which will require ordering parts and equipment as early as possible, and WHEREAS, the parents and patrons of Cave Spring Junior High School who supported the 1992 bond referendum, which provided the funding to air condition most of the remaining schools on the air conditioning schedule, were under the impression that Cave Spring Junior High would be renovated starting in the spring of 1995; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that due to the availability of the Literary Fund loan for the Cave Spring Junior High School renovation project being moved to November 1995, the County School Board of Roanoke County does hereby request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors advance the school board the amount of $2.5 million or an amount necessary for construction to begin on schedule in 1995 and that such amount be reimbursed when the Literary Fund loan is made available. Adopted on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell, duly seconded and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE ~ ,c.c-~-C, ~ / Clerk ~`°. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION31495-8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session March 14, 1995 To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: My name is Paula Bittinger. I live in Bent Mountain. I am president of the Bent Mountain Civic League and member of the Citizen Advisory Group for the Rte. 221 Construction Project. Thank you for taking the time this afternoon to listen to your citizen's concerns regarding road construction and development in the 221 corridor. Unfortunately, this is a difficult time of day for many people. Southwest County has become a very desirable place to live. I hope with prudent planning it will be possible to maintain this desirability. The Roanoke County Visionary Committee holds great promise. It is very unfortunate that the decisions about Rte 221 will be made before we hear from this committee as to what the residents in Southwest County want for their community. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is currently planning a Full Fledge Construction Project in the 221 corridor which includes a 4 lane road and a median with unlimited access. To many citizens including myself, this translates into unlimited growth which will cause an additional burden to the already overburdened schools and public services. I urge the Board of Supervisors to look at the Comprehensive Plan and limit growth in Back Creek, and to encourage the VDOT to consider other design options. A controlled access road could be utilized to limit growth to appropriate areas and encourage cluster development. If a Full Fledge Construction Project requires a 4 lane design with unlimited access, I feel many citizens would prefer to see it reduced to a Safety Project with spot improvements. At the February 9th Bent Mountain Civic League meeting, Mr. Jeff Echols and Mr. Sr~tC Hodge from the VDOT presented to members information on the 221 construction project. I am submitting for the record copies of questionnaires that were completed by members at this meeting. Fifty questionnaires were distributed and twenty-four returned. The population was primarily Bent Mountain residents with a few from Back Creek and Floyd County. Thank you. ~~ County Board of Supervisors Meeting 3114195 ~ ~ ~G~~ ~ Z ~ s ~~il~~ 2 ~~3 ~~t-E-6~t~~ My name is Hugh Hagan. !live on Hollyberry Rd. in SW Roanoke County. 1 am speaking today to voice my concerns over two major issues,l] Future development in our area and 2] Planned road improvements for US 221. AS a resident of the SW county I am concerned over the lack of plans to control appropriate development in our area. Those of us who have chosen to live in this area, have done so for a variety of reasons, including the natural beauty of the valley, and the excellent schools. t am concerned because f see these positive qualities being threatened by what appears to be the desire of our county government to pursue high density development in the SW county. I am concerned by the apparent perception of the Board of supervisors that fhe majority of residents in the SW county favor this type of development, which must be viewed as destructive to the current, desirable way of life we now enjoy. In the long run, little good can come from the destruction of farmland, and low density neighborhoods that currently distinguish our section of the county. We will be tampering with that which makes life so livable here. Before we have gone too far, I am requesting that the county undertake appropriate poNing of SW county's population on the issue of #uture development here, and that this data be made public. Based on this information, rational, intelligent decisions can be made to guide development. The second issue deals with the alarming plans for construction pf a new US 221 in the SW county. County Board of Supervisors Meeting 3/14/95 t have followed this issue #airly closely since moving into the area 8 years ago. I have tried to keep abreast of plans for alternate corridors for road construction. I was not pleased to discover that the corridor being most seriously considered by the Board of transportation carries this 4 lane highway through our current neighborhood, which lies a half mile south of the current 221 corridor off Old Miil Rd.. To say that this current plan would disrupt the lifestyle of my neighbors and destroy our property values is to understate the issue drastically. The road currently being planned would be similar in width and appearance to US 419. I would suggest that a road of this magnitude, running to an area of sparse population, would change the SW county for the worse. Unwanted commercial development could and probably would follow a road of this type. Dense housing development, attracted by the highway ,would place an intolerable strain on services such as schools which are already becoming overburdened. The issue which appears to be driving this push to growth is the desire to increase tax revenues to pay for county spending. This will drive our way of life in this unique area to extinction unless we act now to protect our legacy. As an alternative to the current planning for a new four lane highway, I would tike to make the following comments for the consideration of the Board. First, I recognize that certain improvements in 221 are needed. These include straightening of treacherous curves and construction of deceleration and turn off lanes to allow a smoother flow of traffic. County Board of Supervisors Meeting 3/14/95 Second, I feel consideration should be given to making these important improvements within the current 221 right of way. With careful planning, the impact on our present homes and businesses and the environment could be minimized, and the undesirable development that would accompany a 4 lane road could be prevented. Third and last, the residents of SW county must be involved in the decision making processes that guide any major road construction through our neighborhoods. To fail to do so adversely effects all of us ,whether we are directly impacted by the a particular road, or not. I would like to thank the members of the council for allowing me time to make these comments. 11,~III11111111111illilllllllllllllllllllillllll lilllllllllllllllllllll1111 l 111111111111111111illlllilllllllilllllllll lllllllllllllilj~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - = SUBJECT: - ~~ ~ /1/j~„i - - - -_ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. - _ ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view oni~. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - __ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = ._ - - - _ - _ - - - - - _ _ - _ - - _ - - _ - - _. -_ - - - -, - - NAME - - - - - - _ = ADDRESS ~ ~~,~,/ ~~ ~, = - - - - - - __ ~// = PHONE tf G ~ - - _ _. _~ mllllllllillllillllllllllllillliililllllllilllilllilliilllilllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllilllilliillllillllillllllll 11111111 ~iiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiuiuuiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiuuiuiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiut~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~VI - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - _ - - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ - - _ - _ - - = SUBJECT: ~ .:~ ,,~ - _. -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to = _= do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and or co = vnth the clerk. ~ / mments ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ _ - - _ _ - NAME ~., - - - _ _ - - ~ ~, ~ - ADDRESS ~ 5 .~ ,~~'~/i,-~~ ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PxoNE ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ __ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiititiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiittiitiiii~il'i ~iiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~t~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE `~J CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~- -_ ~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. • = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,,.~ ii _ ~„ I~ ~~ c. ~~ t - J~,Y?:i 1 f~ ~ ~~ ~~.,~ ~ ~Yr'i,_~ u'~-;~.~ _ k, ~,, ~..~._ ~~~a (/fi-~ S G~,-,~-~cst_ ~u~, ~ ~ S iu . -_ ~-_ = NAME ~ ~~ _ I (;; ~.,,< ~ ~, ~ ~ c ~ /- c -_ -_ q ADDRESS `~ ~~ ~ ~l ~ ,` C _~~ _ PHONE t l - 1-9 ~ ., L., .° _~ ~uiiiiiuiiuiiuiuiuuuiiiiuuiiuiuiuiiiiuiiuiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiit~ s - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. Y ~' \ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - _ - - suB cT• - - JE ~i ~- I - _ _ _. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - BELOW: - - -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time 1-mit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. - - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _. - - - - - - - - -_ -_ - - - NAME ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,~~ lz (~ ~~ - - - - = ADDRESS ~s~z. ~ = i~ i ~_ - _- - - - _" PHONE ^7r`F ' c~,S~ / _ -. m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiuiiiiuiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ - - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~PR~y ~ME~1~5 'R~ ~ , s, '~T~ , 22 j = __ =_. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = c = NAME ~ [. D d t~ ~- ; 1~ G2 ADDRESS_ ~ ~ 1 ~a ©~ M T ~ ~ ~fl , g£N i ~(r ~ , - .~ _ PHONE ~~ ~~'J - ~ 5 (, ~ _. _~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1i11~~~~~~~~~~~llli~~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ll~l~~~~lllllill~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~l~llllll~ll~lll~l~l~~li~l~~~~~~~~~~~ll~~~lll11J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - = SUBJECT: ~'°~.~ t ~ ~ ~ ,= v~ = - - _ - _. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ - - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ._ - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ - ._ _ - - _. ~ = NAME ~ 1 ~- ~~ ~`~+~~ ~> ~_~ c.ekyc~ ~ r - - _ - -_ = ADDRESS ~ 1~= ~~ ~ `-~ ~ _ ~~ ~ l,/ ~ -~C ~ ~ = - ~ - _ - _ "' - - - PHONE ~ ~ ~_ ~ _ ~~ ~ ._,, ~ -_ mllllliilillilllilllillllllllllillllllllll 11 11 llllllilllllllllllillillllllllillllllllllllliilllllllllillllilllllllillllll 11111111 111~~~~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllilllllliillllllllllllll~ - - - - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. I`~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE /CITIZENS COMMENTS c ,~ c SUBJECT: C~,cA ~ t; (1~~~-~~,C'~i c n ~ ~~~ ~ ~~.; nm~n~- n-~-- ~~'- ~ . ? Z ( __ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ _ BELOW: -_ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minute = s to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time I~mit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,= PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _, ._ NAME _ __ ADDRESS ~ f ~~ ", ~) ~I , ' ~ -,.~~ , ~~~ ~. ~__ .,. ~. PHONE %~?c~_~~~? ~_ Ililllllllllllllllllllllllllllliililllill 111 l IIIIIilllllillllllillillllllllillllilllillillillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll~ ~iiiiuuiiiuiuiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiuiiuiiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~- I - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ - = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - -_ SUBJECT: a a ~ Corr i d o y' - ~_ ~. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - _ - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - Y ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. - _ _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ _ _ NAME 14' ~ ~, ~ ~ e i n ~e - ~" - _ - ADDRESS l ~ t ~ 5 ~ o-t-f = .~ - ~-~, C'r~~ fat . - - - - - _ - PHONE R a ~ - ~-~ S 5 ~ _~ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiii~iiiiiitiii - 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111j~ - - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - - -_ suB CT: f 2 21 - ~. = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c - - BELOW: - -_ - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - - - _. - ._ NAME ~-~ ~s ~- ~_, _ 1 --~ :'1 c; /~ - - - - - - - __ ADDRESS ~ Z ~ '~ ~-~ ~ ~ rte. ~; ~ Z ~ ~ i --~ ` ~ l ~S = - - PHONE ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ = .__ iilllllllllllllililiiillllllliliilllllll I II I l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiillllilllllililliillllllllillilllllllliillllllllllllillililii111~1 1~i1~~~~~~~llllllll~l~ill~ll~~~~l~llll~l~~~ll~lll~~~~l~ll~lllll~l~llillll~l~lll~~llillllllllllllll~ll~llllllllill~i~~~~lllllilllllljl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST '_ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: C~ iJ Y1r) ('~ ~aY ~ liZf'~ ~%~'~ ~Y ~~: t,~~, ~, ~ ~. =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time I~mit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ - ~_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. v c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ ~ _ NAME r-e v, ~ ~'• ~l' if ~c~. = ADDRESS = _ = PHONE ~3 ~ z - c~ ~ s-y = _~ IIIlilllllillllllllllillillillilllllllliiilllllllillllllilllllllllillilllllilllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllililllllilllllll~ ~iiiiiuiiiiuiuiiiiuiuiiiiiiiuiiiiuiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - n~-f - _ _ _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. Y~ - - - - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ - ~ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ - -_ - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE y CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - suBJECT: ~~ .~~ ~ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - BELOW: - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. • c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ - _ _ - ,~ _ NAME r - ~ ~ CC C.k> C_ ~ - ~ ~ - ADDRESS - U / !-f ~ I ( b~ ;~~ ~ ~ - _ _ - PHONE ~ ~ `(- ~~ ~..(~ _. ~_ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~(Jlll~llll~llillllllllllllllllililllllilll~~lilllll~llllililllllllllilll~~lllll~illlllllllllllllllllllllllllilllli~i~ll~llllll~lll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - __ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - r = suBJECT: ~ ~~ _ _ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ - , = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - _ -_ - ~~ ~ ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to c do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. • Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - - - - - - - - - - ,_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - ~ - ~ ~n/l ~ - - NAME 1 ~ , - - i C - - - _. ._ - .~ - _ _ ADDRESS - ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~... Y~ . ~ f ~~ -_ - _ _ PHONE c7~' - J v~ 3 ` ~ /~ C\ ~/~ ~'] // ~ `~ ~ - _~ IIIlillllllllllllilllilllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllillllllilllllillillllllll~ 11111~~~~IIIIIIilllilllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllilllllllllllllllllliilllllllllllliillllllllillllljj~ _ _ _ _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _~ [_! 2 - - - - - - _ - - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ _ - - suBJECT: D~ ,~,~~~~ y~D~~~/ ' ~S z L~ _ ,s __ =_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to com e t mn whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl~~. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ r c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY - AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ __ _ __ - - NAME ~ D~ ~~ ~ S' ~ ~ __ ~ ~G ADDRESS ~ Q = D~ ~D~~o = - ~ e /) / - PHONE ~/ ~ ~ / U S ~o Z- s_ mlllllllillillllllllllilillllllilllillliil 11 11 lllllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllll~ RvtTTE ~ ~ ~. To: 1`irginia llcpartment c~C Trans~c}rtatic~n ~~~e. il~e undersi~:i~ed re:icient: c>l~ i~irgiiia, are C~PPaSiIa :.~ t37al:iiig P,c~ute _'Zl a fc-ur lame road in sauti~«~e: t Rc~ailal:cs l,c~wlt:.:;~~.° uj-~~ ~-ciu G> ~ F:'~'~lt~p alterna~i ~ e: t~.i t'1'Qlilk)t~ i~i~t. s~'llile i~~~t u~:~Gr~~',°iil~ till yUalit'. ~_~; IifEl lle{'~_, a) =[_~~iti7'~de:,t P,vanul~:e Cuun~ti~. Printed i:ame Si;~nature ,address Tel. K ~.~k~ ' ~(~y~~ f, e"~,~,~ ~~~-557 J ~ ~ _ -~ 1, o~ ~ ~ ~2~~~ " c-l p ~ L yi o~k~lal~,s i; o~ S ragu. ~w.~. G• Rero,~a~- ~~z-z3yD ..c'-~.~ ~~ ~ 11 ~~ 1 ~_ ~ ~ i t ~ ~ ~~ 15 7~G ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 77~ Og4~ l~ ~~ v:~, ~~-~ ~~~J32 ,~ has s ~~ ~~-~ -- 77z-7r~~~ ~rl-~~j RvTJ~'E ~ ~ 1 To: Virginia Department. oC Tran~pc~rtatic~n 5_ f, ~~~ '~'T ~( Z -~~'~ti ~~~~ ~~ 3~ ~~ ,~r~ ~v ,a ~~ t~'e. the undersigned reGicient: al~ ~~irgis~ia, are CiT'P~7SEji , ~ ~z~aI:ing P,c~ute "1 a ic~ur lane read in sc~uth~.est Rc~anoi;e C,c~unt~ ,~-c urke ti•r_-u t~.~~ ~~~~.~elc~l? alternat~~~~e: to ~?rc~~uc>te , afel~• ;.~llile nc~t de: t~~r~~•ing tl~e yualit,t 4_,. lip hcr~= ,~, _-~_~uthtiE~e: t P.c-an~~l:e i.t~un~~~. Printed iatve Signature ~, ~ }~dd1~E's^ Tel. ~ ~( ~ .. ;; `, ~ ~ ~ D ~~~~ -.~ ~ ~~~ h ~~ 4: ~~ R~TJi~ ~~l Tc}: ti~irginia Department oC Tran~pc~rtatiun ~~'e. the undersit;nc=d resident: ol~ ,4 irgi,ia, are G)"~POSEr~ t~.~ t~~al:i.lg Route _'~ 1 a four lane read in sc~uthk~est Rc~anoi;e l,c3unt~ `'c ur~4 ~~c.~u ~~~ ~~~~~~e1c~t? alternat ~e: t~~ t?rc;n~c~te ,ai4t:• ~,~hile nc_~t detrc~~•in~ the yualit~ti c.;; l[e her~.~; i~uth~t~e°,t P.vanc~l:e Cuunt~. Printed lame Signature ,~ddres: TeI. 7~~ ~, ~ E ~. , , . ~ f 7 "~ .~- ~~ P . ~ ~ F f. ~. /~ f . i ~ ~ ~, r ~ir1f;`~~ f ~ ,; J, r ~ r `.I} 1 ill ~< r _ ~, ...~~ ` ~ ~. • r' ., r ~ ~l ~ ~ f :~ rxf ' s r ~f ~ ~ ~; ~ t Gi~C r' r~(j ~~ ~ _ i ~ f// i - 1 ,~ ` ~ ~ i r ~7~ ~GEs r, ~ n~ 1 ^ ~~~-7 :- 15,E ~, %, ,, ~7?!~~%~%~ ::! ~fi% < < ~%-~ l~f-- ~ -~ ROJTE 221 To: Virginia Department oC Transportation ~~e, the undersigned resident: of `~~irgil+ia, are UPP~7SEIj ~ .~ n~al:ing P,ouc;~ X21 a four lane road in south: est Rvanoi:e i:c~unt~• ;t~ e urge ~•~.~u ~t_~ ~~:: ~~ clop alternate ~ es tc- proivote :afel~~ E.fhile nest de~ro•.•ing the yualit~. c..; l;fe her~:~ ;j ~,~,ut1~~E•est P,cfancfke Countti~. Printed isame Signature .~ddres Tel. __.. 5 54lrah ~t~q^~ n.bo~q~, ~,~ °1 ~ u ~ i ~~ Sleu ~--'l. ~Zg-U ~o~- e u/ olG~- ~~ ~J1~ ~; r >f ~¢s~ 6ox~o~ 3~ 7J s~~o ,~l 1;2~~C,T1~N l /9 Lr/ p~M~-j-~ V 1/L~ "_ _ G~i'1~d~ 1~0 ~x 4f ~~7' /YtiY~ GA 203 ~ t c~ t~~-. ~' ~37 ~~ o~~~'~ Z~~~ lI ' /~33 8 '' ~ 1~~ l ._ 1 ,~ .~ 15 ~' - ~ -~ 77a7-6~s3 ~~~ qz~' ~r6~ i~~7V ~~ L Tc}: Virginia Department of Tran~pc~rtatic~n t~'-e, the undersigned residents cif ;~ir~;i,ia, a. ~ ~I''Pl7SEI? i ., i~~ai:iilg P,ovte ?' 1 a fc>w- lane road in sUUlll~:-est F-,Ualloi:c~ C~3unt~. ~,t-~: urge ~'.1u tc~ ~_2~~•~~eic~l? alternat;~es tc~ t~rt.3mc~te afel~' ~4'l11 P,c~ancfke Couilt~~. Printed ;~atne ~. fit. Me C' Q~- le n~~t dE ;art,}'ing ~17e yualic,t Et~ ltf leer-:- ;_-~ ~-..~utll~.~e~=t Signature ,~ddr~.ls Tel. ~~~ a1~rs d~• 79[~~ -re5~ G ~ Dr ,`c ~~/~~ s ~A~~u ~ ~o nn~e~ ~.9~~ ~a5 i o I~ rn~ r r R~ ~ys9 /n~v-~~~s ~d ~~y-a~~ a- t; r~~~~/~ ~`~ ' o A~ ~«C~ 563-~~ 0 2 ~5ch "fhb Cs~~ ~~ S~izr ~~ t c ~ es Piz 1 1 ~U1~.L.1!~ v~ 1., ~s.-.~ ~C~t~~fn~- l=1 i ~ ~ , ~J v~~f ?~~/ ~~43~r3 '1'I~V-3171 ~_7yy3 ~'S- 3/~ d ~~v ~3~y ~2~23r 7 v' 6 7 ~s'c/C~y„~_ ~Ues/~ ~0~.~ ;~ ~ ~~ 7l~fd l~6/lylk:riY~~6 ~' ~ /o5yt (3aZ?c~„ CreCkr?c~ ~`i~J R~TJTE ~ ~ ~. To: ~~ irginia Department of~ Tran: nc~rtatic~n ~~~e. tic= undersi~;nc3cl reGic~c}nt: cif ~~ ir~;i:~ia• a ~ ~iPPI~~ET1 ~ ~ raking P,UU« "1 a four lane rc~acl in svuth~,~e t Rc~anc~l.e t,csunt~: ~-~ u; ~e ti~:.~u ~,:_, -~~•~~eic~i? alterna~; ~•e tc~ nrc~m~~te afel~• ~~-l~ile niat ,;s~~rc~,~in~ Glee yu~lit~F 4_~ ife her~:° ;_ _-~;uth~.~e.~ Printed l:atne ~iFna~ure .~clcir~3ss TeI. ~ ti,~-c,rS ~~ 3 q l~ off", ~ ~ ~~a ~~- ~A ~~ ~~ ~ ;~ -~ 5 / r~ rh ~~002 11 ~L ,' ~ -- ~' ^ ~ r r ~ °Z'~ ~ f c ? SD 1 l1At~... ~ ~ y1or~ g ~ ~ 71 3 J ~, i r, ~I~~ I 1 ~' r' s~~J~- 1 ~~ C~ ~: ~ ~~1r~N 15 ~_ t~ ~,~ ~r . ~t ^.,-., ~~ i:~~ ~_~~yz ~~~ '`~ S -# ~ Gam' ~,~ ~ 2 ~ y`~ ` ~ ~ ~ '`' ~ ~c a~ a ,~, 1?~ . ~_ . Irv:: !'^-. "', -' ~ ~`; yr ~Q ~~~ ROUTE 221 To: ti'irginia Department ~f Tran~pc~rtatic~n ~~'e. thci undersigned resident: a1• `,~irgir+ia. are C~Pi~I~SiI~ t~_~ making P,aute ~~1 a fvur lane rc-ad in svuthu•est Rc>anc~i;e ~c~unt~ ~.~ e urge ti~~.~u t~> ~~e'~ elc~p alternate ~ ~: t[- t~r~~tncste :aielti• «~hile n~~t ~ie~t1'itt'ill~, t17Gy ~t3alit°; ~.~i li{~.= l1er~_° ;~ ~l~uth~.'E'.~t P,c~anol:e CUUntti~. Printed name Signature .~ddres 7e1. l M~,;; . R<<I~f . ~, 79 i o B~r~ lain ~' ~~ ---~., u~-1~ M- ~e~ ryes ~„ ~ s y M ~ lI ~~ ~_~~. ~, 4 , ~ ~~r r -~A~(D 2 Q ~o yr~v-- ~~~~ ~~~ G 1~G- ,br-fir- ~~ ,~~ _ ~~ , ,~.~e' ,~f .!' ~1-.• C''",.,,~4 .... ~1 /lo ~ boa ~a N ~ .fc .- G ~' ~o ~ ~~~~=~~ I1 II 1 ~ 2~c- ~ Ct,12 t1~l2 b~Sco ~~rk- f ROUTE 2 ~ 1 Ta: ~`irginia Department. vI~ Tran~partativn «' e, the undersigned residents of ~+ irgi.~ia. are CiPi~~~ Ei~ ~ .~ making P,ovt4 '21 a four lane read in south~~est roano~.e Gtsunt~ . -~''c: urge ~~~.~u tcf ~~~`.'elc~~? alternati~~e: tea t?rc~tvote :afel;~ ~;~hiie not dEtro,•ii7g ti1G ~ualit°= ~~; life 11~r':~ ;~ ~{juthti.~tz=t P~oancrl;e County. Printed itiame Signature ~,ddres: TeI. a. ~p~2 ~i~,~.~rlr ~ ~//lc/~C ~J~ J/1/'l~C~.~[ -^ ~1~/.~'~ is~s's-' ~r : .C 2Y~/~ ~~~7 5 i~a~~ 6 ws~~~ :~ ~ `1 ~ ~,~f- YYl,~. 2.~. ~c~ ~v~. ~~or~ /~ r ~• z~i a ~_°~' ~` / ~, V a ~- , ~;~ ) 7<~.. r !~ 77 Z - Z~f/o q8~ -~~~ ~ 7 ~ 3~ l .~, ~ , 77z-3~.~- ~~ ~~ ~~-3~ y3 n - f1 ~ a ~-- ~, R~TJTE ~ ~ 1 To: ~~irginia Department ~f~ Transpc~rtatiun ~'e. the undersigned resident: vi ~ irgizia. are CiPPC~:~lj ~ ~ ttial:ing P,oute '~ l a four lane read in sc~uth~•est F;~.sanc~l:e t,csunt:. «~ c urge ~~~.~u <<> ~ ~~ :'elc~p altertiati~~ es tc~ nrc~nivtet safet~• 1•~liile nc~t ife:trr~t•in~; Glie yt~alit~; -_~; life liere ~:~ <<~ut1i1.'e:;t P,c~anc~he t,ounw. Printed i:ame Signature ,~ddres -~~vs Tel. 77 5~= a ~z-9 ~~~-_ ~Sa 2 '' ~~~~ l~«~.~-.t.1~FQ.~~ ~ ~Y ~ 4 ~ ~ ~" ~~ y3aD ~i.Q ~~~GU, 366 ~o 5'~u.La..T"~ L'j"r/" n ~ ~j i . ~~- lit 1 r11 ~., nlL ~~P ~ ~~ 7~z6 g43 ~~5~~ ~~ ~$~ _a 3v ~ $CSt~.I l~h ~ ~e r t I1C ~, nnom,., .15 ~~ /5'~/G ~~9~Idc~ ~u~ C~,S~fZ ~lh~__2~' .~ ~dc~ v I~na~~ .SouMvNs~~S~N `~!~_~~~ ~~UTE ~ ? 1 Ta: Virginia I3epartment af~ Transpc~rtatic~n t~'e. the undersigned resident. v1' ~rirgi~ia. ar~~ i:~PPi?S~T~ c ~ making I;ovtc~ '2] a four Jane road in south«~est Roanoi,e i;ount• ;'e= urge ~~.~u tt_> ~~~~~.~~~iup alternative; ti- I?rc.~mote safet~• j+~liile nc_}t ~.ie cri}{ il1F Elie c~uaIit~.~ c.~f Iife li~f~~ ~~~ =;~.~utl1~~'e; t P,oanol:e Cauncv. - Printed I;amE' SiF~ ati~re .~ddres TeI. 1 I~,~r ,~ SKI ~ R ~ ~' =~ 7.Z- 95~~ r,C Sz .~~ zrt. ,~ . Y e . a~ ~ i i r / / . P-c~_ ~3c~ Zvz~~ 2~0/S/ 2 ~/~ ~ ~ ,~ a~~~9~'S-~~~3 // ~~H~~^~ ~. }. ~~ • ~. 'l ~,OUTE 2 21 To: ti irgiria liepa; tdent of Tran~pa; Cation ~'e, the undersigned residents c>1' ~~irginia. are t7j~PC7jED to making Raute 'Z 1 a four lane rand in southu°est naanoke County. ~'e urge you to develop alternatives to promote safety while not destroying the quality at life here in southa-est Roanal;e Caunn•. Printed tiame Signature Address _- ~7 ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~- ~~ 4 ~' 5 g l~ ~ s ~ ~-~ `JG nc~bcr~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ .. n~h~rC~ T'ti~M1I <,~ ANN M~~T~~ ~(~~9d IU 1~1~~r"-cep-~ r~?cr~~~ .:s°~ca Cl~i'~'.ti ~~z~~ ,V~ 1 { ~2~-riU u~'ia~/ ~ ~/ ~ ~rx D~~ ~ ~~a3/~ ~' ~ ~ L~ 1 ~`~~~- c~ ~ u .~ a 7 q C[,~~'l~~~tT Gt~oC~r~ a ~ o~~ ~~ ,. i `~y~rlr'~~~p lY ~1Lp r ' Q~ - ~C~t G+ ab~5 ~(l1rlUS~ ~~ ~ J~~. ~ $G-~ 33~j Tel. :~=JL/s ~ Z~ 5 ~~ ~ y-fz~5' k a. ~2~(-~y;~ ~963~~,~;~ ~~. Sl~Yvb~~ ~q=y3 s 8 ~3y ~~~~ 9a ~ - ~S 1 ~u l ~G I l~ -"~~•nu ~~ ROUTE 221 To: Virginia Department of Transportation ~'e, the undersigned residents of Virginia, are C~AP4SEU to making Route ZZ 1 a four lane road in southwest Roanoke Count}-. ~e urge you to deg°elop alternatives to promote safet~• while not destro~•ing the ~ualit~• of life here in southwest Raancrke Couniv. Nrinted me I ~ Signature (~ H i `0 S ~~~-c.~5 address rel. ? Suzon C. lbw les j /~,ac~NY E. ~/~c ~ S~Rfl~4i~ ~l ~ri~V TR 6 ~~~ r ~n~x•-r 7t~lirkEi 13~--,,wGetZ ~~~rN~ /f 1~1L ~0,4r~o ~, Zy`l`l ~ic~.e.~ ~C~. Qox T Ber,-F N~i~.. y'A 9a9-yc1~'I , aENr m T- -~ ` _ $8 ~5 ~ooR Ma~+`N r7oR~ y~i w~86 ,sr~r w y,.Z ~-s.23y a ~"~ ~. Div l~o~-iUc~k~ 2~0~~ 3~ ~-~ 7.3 2 I I~nbe~ to C.-.~~hn.SOn I ~ ' Shia ~. S itdber~ I;Ta~,~ rr. ~~sj~, C. 1 ~ ~ f e ve. ~~~ ~-' ~M I~ ~r~k- ~GS: L l 2~ -y~s~ Sz9'~3~~ ,ti ~.nf /lid. ~A 9~9-4y59 ~.r'~r ~y~,il~ ~~;r? q 2S'~~ f ~~. l~.P~ 9S -~ ROUTE 221 To: Virginia Department of Transportation ~'e, the undersigned residents of Virginia. are OPAOSED to making Route 221 a four lane road in southwest Roanoke County. ~'e urge you to develop alternatives to promote safety while not destroying the duality of Life here in southwest Roanoke County. Printed name Signature Address Tel. ~/~ a~~~~ i n~~~, l~, h ~v,1S~n ~ Win, w~ s~~~ ~~r~ ~~- ~ ~~~-o~oy 2 ~r'~~ur ~fC~Tb~~':n S3ya 4l~UowS~ Rd . QT I~~ 7~y-1'36 ~l' n ~.. ~ g (cc~sb~~ ~ f ~, ~ t ~ ' Q~ 7C ~- (~ ~ -~ t,Q ~ ~1 S~ ~ i/1~ ,1~+~ ° ~ S3 - I ~.CJ i rt , ~ r --~ ~, ~ ' ~~ ,~ ~ ,~, ~j i ;/ '~~~ 1I L~Sa L<~ck?U .~~S~7 ~J %'%:~-T ii~~:~~~ ~~7~1-~~~C, ,~„ 'Cv ' `.~~ ~~'`v.t~1~~~.~`~C~. 5~~'>~~ ~~„~\:~L_, S.~-<~-~r ~~~ 1"1~~ x-351 14 °K~^~- ~ ~ 3 S ~ new. ~ ~- d~u y `l ~ - ~~ 3 8 ~~~ uA ~Q~ ~'ti(l"r/) ~~JC.G~7~1Ci. ~" ~ k-G ~ <~ `!l ~ ~ / ~ ~C ~~. ~IG cc.i S~ : G r, < iQ / / T ~ ~ ~'S ROUTE 221 I0; ~?1rg1n1a I1eI?aftII]ellt of TranSl?ortatlon tri'e, the undersigned residents of Virginia, are aPP~~~ED tc> making Route 221 a four lane road in southR-est Roanoke Countti•. t~"e urge ti~ou to del~elop alternati~~es to promote saiet~~ u~hile not destro}~ing the ~ualit}~ of Ii.{e here in sc~u~i~~~,~~est itoanoke Countti~. Printed ame :~i~nature address Tel. I I~~le.-~-~ 13a~~~;~,~ , xio ~'y~~;~u~~~~,Y; N:~~i.~I~~, --~.~ ~~ y~~, -,~., ~~ _ ~-titi Vic) ~ ~ ~ ~~-:~~- ~ %"z- ~ C U7 ~ S, ~l ,:~ ~i;~~/ ~' 7 %~%~ -, ~ ~.~ ,~ c .%' ~ ~ fit' a .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ ~~. ~ ~ l ~ , ~~~ l .,~ ~ / / /~ ~~'~c~~' t; Jam. o ~ 1 - ~ ..% ~ r~. v, ~. ~ ., --a ~, ~ ~~' ~C( 7 L t~ U ~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~.I~ ~ ,1 rra.~. ~Ct, ~ "~1-~~~.r ~~,J V' ^ '.-~_ `~' _~ ~ ~-~c (a. /, ~{ r / / ~ c~„~SG; i 1 Yt ll ~ rnC~; ~ ~s i~~.i:~ ~1 i : `-~~ "Yl'~~-~ rT ~~ k~~ ~ ~ f / <,t~~1,~ A~ ~ ~ ~~~ _GJ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~; _, 1 7 +-IUC>N ~ ~;~1-.1F ~~IRG r ~ `I- n ',cv~.:,c~- ~? ~ ~ ~c>I Iu ~:, i~~., ~~ ~ ~' 4 -f,~! ~'.E~ ~~/ , j (- `~ ~/ _ _~ U R~'~TT~ G ~ l T+~: Virginia Department of Traii~r,~cxtatic~n GV ~, t!]C' Un(lel'Gitt]ed t'~:1L~C1lt UI '~'Ir~;t;ila, iil'~ ~%1'l~l?~l:~; • " ?Ti.tliltlg \UUt4 ~i l a fc,ur lane rc)acl in sc)uth~: e; t Rc)an();:e i:()unt~ , ;Y (: ui-;~ ~~i.~u :~-% ~~ .3ic)t? alt~~rnats•e: t4) nrpmC)L~ ~~II~i~' -•-hilG nc~t i,~e;;~1';_)'='~t~~ tt'14yualic`~ ~-'~ iii' ll~'C'' .; :=s.iUtf7~+'~:~t 1.UuIlU~:L CUUI1tV. Prjnteci ~;atve Si~na~ure ~~ddrels TeI. USA ~ -~ ~~ So3d r 5 K ~.r, ~u~ C r (} Sb3-Y/~Z .~T~''E.v ~R!//~fh~-~~za~5e5!~~~cy,6~~~~~~~ 7470 ~f/~.f~f/~Dr ~^~~_ ~~o~ c J`ar~~~t.- ' ~D ~~ ~i?~-~d 6 ~~x. ~J r ~ ~f `~-0~ o ~j ~l --- 10 - 11 ~ -- - 1~ - t :, 15 'i - - - ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~.~- ~zoy ROUTE 221 To: Virginia Ueparcment of Transportation We, the undersigned residents of V-irginia, are (7PPOSED to making Route 221 a four lane road in southwest Roanoke County. We urge you to develop alternatives to promote safety while not destroying the quality of life here in southwest Roanoke County. Printed Name Signature Address Tel. ~ ~~G F 7C~~.vti It ~~-~~-~2_ ~'~~ ~- ''1 ?~ hail i ~~r y ~j cl ~ ~ C~67~ 4 - ~ ~ r ~/~ ilk' ~ ~- o s -,~ ~ :- ~~ ~ ~a~7 10 11 12 13 14 15 ~~V~~ ~~ To: Virginia Depart~ient of Trans~ort~on ~G'e, the undersigned residents of ~~ irginia, are OPPOSED to making Rovte 2~ 1 a four lane road in southwest Roanoke Covnty, R'e urge you to develop alternatives to promote safety while not destroying the quality of life here in southwest Roanoke County. Sign tur~ ~, ~~~ Address Tel. Printed Name l~Q ~ ~ ~'4 --~~ t ~~ c '~ r ,.Ili: u " ;~%~~`l 3 ~ ~ ,~, m, ~ c ~~ EN t) ~~ 1G lI 12 lj C? ~/ld-c-~-~C ~~ 7j~z~l/o/%G•~rry /l~ ~,~ / ~ ~S~rD ~2~vfasse~ 7loz -/~ fir. ~~ v ~ 14 To the Virginia De~artmer;t of Transportation' I WOU 1 d 1 ]. ke tO expre^~ my CO''Cer n°. o`:'er YO~!r u~COml ng improvements to Route 221. I am opposed to makins? 2~'1 ? four lane highway. 7'}~ini!gh cnr~,,,= imp•-oVE'm+2n•CS ~?"e W~rr?nt.~?d ~ ~l.~C~-1 as more turn lanes] I fai 1 to understand f-~ow a fo~_.r lane ~i1<~;hL~Jay W_11 !mr1-O`.'C-' thte ~:~'('ety Of CU7" C.:~mm~.,ln:.ty. G:OI!tc ~ C [ foul lane; which tra`•~'els through geography- similar to our" is d~_finitely' not. safer than t~aJO lane R~~ute _~~ ~Jith the upgrading of 221 to a fo~_Jr lane hi~hw=y kill comp de~.-elo~ment and thU` mC'~re t,-affiC, ~:JI'~o t~E'T't='",'lt~? Not. the res:ic~ents of Back Creek, b~_!t the real estate developers u.~ho 1'01'2see a bonanQa Ot residential and CC'mfT!et-Clal d'':~OIOG'nlent . G' l e a s ~' C O p c i d B 1" l~; h ._, t 1 S ~~ r a t t o'1- p i-J r- ~.-_ f :~ t y .a i-~ r~ (j i_ i t COmfl?llri'_ty, not. ti'ie C:C`Un}.y'~ fiitt_i7-e tah ~,acF., Thank: you, Get1^~ F'. Fir.~:ler Back Crr~~k Comm~!nity ?n18 Hi~hfields Farm Gr. Plover~:,er 21, 1954 To Whom It May Concern: Asa 6-year resident of the Back Creek area, I strongly oppose the widening of route 22i. koanoke County zoning maps designate the Back Creek area a "rural village." Improvements to highway 22i could cause this status to be ieopardi~ed as property with highway frontage could be rezoned for commercial uses along the improved roadway. Widening route 221 will be hazardous to the environment. Back Creek is a natural resource much-loved by residents and it must be protected. I cannot imagine development to the highway which would not adversely affect the crc-~ek. The topograpr,y is rnaur,tainous with slopes which are unstable in Borne areas; residents still view with horror the unbelievable disaster area created below Bridlewoad during Stage 1 of this pro,7ect. There is no guarantee t'r,at another such disaster will not occur during widening of the highway. it also appears that there is no guarantee the Bridlewood disaster will ever be corrected. Studies have shown that 7000 of the 10000 vehicles using the roadway daily are from Bent Mountain. Perhaps an alternative route down off the rnoun}min should be considered. it has been reported that truckers use route 221 to travel from Hilisville to Raano',~.e. An alternate route would keep these vehicles out of the rural-residential Back Creek area. T'r,ere are several historically significant properties along route 221 which could be endangered should the widening take place. The F'oage faun house is one of the oldeti~t and best-preserved historic structures ir, our area. The property has been farmed for generations by the carne family and widening tr,e rand through the middle of the farm could rr,e:~n the end of their livelirux~d, as well as one of the most scenic spots in the Roanoke valley. ,e old Wiliet house which stands at the intersection of route 221 and Martin"s Creek Road was originally built in the 17J~J"s. Should the widening pra,7ect extend to the foot of Bent Mountain as was originally planned, this historic home could also be endangered. Such rare and precious structures serve to identify and define this special community ar,d they should be preserved at all cost. When I moved to the Back Creek area, I accepted the fact that driving to and from town would take at least 10 minutes. I understand that occasionally I would have to drive behind allow-moving farm vehicle. Residents who are not prepared to live wit~'c such inconveniences and slow down on this road should move to the city. Sincerely, Suzanne Sanford ?070 Highfields Farm Dr Roanoke, VA 24018 VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). C~ ran you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Iv Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~h r`na~. 1 ~ ~k ~.n5~~ h> Se,e rnuc~ ~rndre d~euueci.~-~rr~-- aQ ~ ~ ~S C~t,~`c re.In loe~ ~- Co~n~i ~~ ~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~~ ~- ~.~ de~et~~~ ~ ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~5 ~ +~~ ar ve (;~ rn~ ~d ~~ ~~ ~c~ev1e(o~prne ~- . ~ Q~ ~~ ~r~bl,e r^ C m~~ ~ a ~ ~ n ~ ~ S Lu ~1'~ V~ a Val ~ Farm showed Avera e Dail traffic co~ teen on ~ecember 16, 1994, at Po g y g Y Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,-t y Z . The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~~s ~ ~.r r • ~atn c~~ a ~dia~ S'yr~ p ~ ~~ Q~~ o~ ~ ~ rnt~~ `(~,'1 l ~" Inca ~ c e ~~ ~ v~ ~ 5 ~ deb a ~ buy ~~. ~ "~S an ~bar~ uv~~ ~ -ITh~ Yl.2~d ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~U S~` ~,~~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~S Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? d ~~ i nCY~a ~ ~r~~' If not, what would you suggest? ~av~i ~ n,~6~. o~cc~~ , ~. IS~!'~t5 Q ~,~~ 1,n, C~CCc~tlt~ 1~Q~. C~Yl~1r~~ (~'~,~ h,~t/l l ~a~ ~a~ ? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane s Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~ l U ~ ~ rn~k ~l'1 ~ ~ h ~ s e~S2 /~~ (1~^ . ~~ ~ ~ w~~ mU~ ~ ~ > a~ ~ ~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compazed to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? 1 ~ Ct~ r y~- - ~~ 0. ~~(~.l ~n l ~'~ S Yu ral Q~65,~k r~ 6~e ~ ~ ~e reas6~ns cue ~ ~ Ye ~ ~ -~-~,,~ Q r~~ . Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? N~ The construction is estimated to take one to two yeazs beginning in the yeaz 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? `O (~ ~` ~ 1'Y~ eY`~ ~ ~ ~11 C~~ (SY~ ~ ~ 61nS~'L- h ~' ~~ ~ ~l. ~S . Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a Road improvement. b) Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d Other (please state). AH/9STf o f' TA/dAyEt ~r~e.vEy • A 7,c/,~Fi~ T Ta TyE ,o F•r~E r SfTE..-,rY i E,~rc r ~.~ ra~r .~,~f.a You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? ~yv Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,'I W z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~S. Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ~U If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ti Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~ ~ /C S OF F/n/Ah~ Y Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? /" _ ` The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. ~~ Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. ~` d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? /~ ~0 ~i ~ ~ w „""'~?;~ o / '7' s t s o,~c` Tic/ ,moo ~c'. / ` ,. ~~'T7 J ~ 1 Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? f -r- r s ~ S ~ ~ ,~ ,.~ i T-t ~ E~' ~~ Ica ~ w ~~~ e.u~ y N .a ,• -~ .S S`~ ~y ~ ~ S /~ ~ c~ % /' o w Tf~ S v i ?~ e/ <~ .' / , -r fie. t- , /i ~ ~ /~ ti -`T`_ ~ 7 g e~ e ,~ ~' 4~ G ,i T i ~~ i o Y ~"~ e ~~ G/~ v ~G "'r.7 0 .-,J ~, r E, .[' 1 ~ V ~. ~ Ll/ f'~ /~I` O I1 i ~.~ ~J - ~ U /. J + ~ r ~/ ~ C/ O ~ / O T !. cJ ~ i C/ % ~ r+.J G 777 O r `~~ 9. A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,~ ~(Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~ e S Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved dr would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? _ G /o ti~ y.y t y~o, ~~ ~s ,~ ~ ~~,~.~ If not, what would you suggest? b~ ,~ ~ ~ `T ~ `~ STra ~ c ~ Te.-~ ~~ v c I g ~u~~) fiver error, do you feel afour-lane road sew _~a~e ~cc~~~.,,--~. ~ cl ~ ,r •.J ....~ ' Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsle}~ Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the limit. Do you feel afoot-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~ Nv S ~ S ~~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? ~ i ,e e c....~) S ~~ ~ t o~ = w o u ~~ ~~ ~ L ~~ ~ 1 r r ~r~~ /~ C ...~ ~ n~ ~~i ~ wry. ,a 1. 1 ~y 1 ~ ! a !~ ..I ~. s I , Would you e w lirig~pa}~mor e takes o"suppo thi type ot'dew~e~opment? '~ r ~ The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions S ` ~ iq nJ r. S cl r C / S C / ~ IC , TT' S T 19 /2 ,T c,~ ~ -z'r7 cr /~l'v"//1/T1 ~'7E. P /Jp/JUI4 ii o.c/ ~ viJ~j ~ TAN ~C, c~~~~ C' 1.~1 r.~ ~.I~ ~. 6 .~ - ~~ ~~ S`i ~yic/cl PS /•u ~e ~ / w 4 Y ~i ~ ~'7'S ,p~ S te, /cJ rC' ~o a~ S '~7 2 r C S 6 ~~I ~, ~ v c~ S y S TC /~7 c ~ Q. ~ e ~ /i nl w r/ / S 4 /,q -v ~ P S. L/ @ ° c / r .~~L r ~~G'L'.S ~~~ ~ ~)/r7 /vicJ /~~j s~3-e v ~ T- I r/ L/ U ~ v e /t.J v- O ~.~ V i r i7-1 ~ r r~ .~ c/ e s . /2 4 S ~~~ V T ` r ~ BPS - w w ~ J ~~ ' ~ . l i~ ~~~-~~ e ~~ a ~~ 7~ ~ -~.. 7' w / / ''Y',` -~` `~ ''~--t /cam u .t/ / ~~ ~ e ,~ e~ ~~ v S e / : w f/ ` S crl ~-, F a U e.~ ~ l~ J e wv e ~ T ' Paula Bittin er ~G'~~ ~ 10325 Tinsle Lane g q Y [ X ~ ~` r 3 VDOT is curl'entl lane ends to Route evaluating a constructio A Citizen Adviso 752 (poages Mil] n Project for Route 221 by VDOT to ~ CO~ittee )' With future from where t, be a member Plans to continue to to gather ideas of this Co formed °f residents the foot of Bc is a result of and concerns fro rr~lttee to hel Ong the 221 m the Bent Mo P identify corridor. 1 ~ questions and issues that Main Co issues, conditions comments and return it to me so 1 have been raised b ~ and o mmun~ty The followin Pii. The co maY bring it to °~. Y the adviso g gUesti~ nstruction desi next rY grOUP• Please strip which gn V meeting. Thanlcsi write will re DOT ~s COnsiderin y you feel that quire 125 feet g for this this construction of right of ~,a project is Project is a/an: Y (current roadwaya s a~'~lane road with a median a) Road i~;i pproximatel b prelude provement. y 50 feet). Do ~Alte tO residential/co d ration of a rural ~nercial develo Other (please state area into urba pment. a sub ) n area much like Route 419. You may circle more than one VDOT has three corridors un a) The der study for this constr existing roadwa , uction b) `~ corridor Y Project: c) A co southeast of rridor along the rid Route 221 across Bac 690 (poage Va11eY Road) e vest of Route 221 k Creek. C connecting with the ~ you support same ali ~Y of these corridors? 1f grlment of Route ~d Yes, which one? paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane it Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~.~ ~ ,~ L~'!r G! ~° Ffn GJOV~O Oic/G Y /D~/C~-S~ 7'ffF yi9~~'/L ~ avow ,~.7c~,--r ~ ,v 7-~ ,s .~t6n _ .voa ~vcn ro,v~' YH~~KS ~~1 ~'J70rLG~ ~!G!/G/CS ~wD D(`'t/E~vo/rHUy-(S G//CCr /~~-tU/~'!~~/ P1g'~LK I'f}~O ~~ ~/~ST~ ~'K~'S Y~ !~ ~ t~i2 p~iecss , A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,?4 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~~ - ~v-r ONLy ZF rf+E ~ f~ci~c. i r3tc--2c-s rs w~.~o F~rcc' IWsH~~ `bb41~S 12oA~ Do~,J~ ENC-~(.e~r EcSC~S'~1~1'~RUf'rZ'S ('~R.C S~CC~-SSF~~. ~tJ T ~ rt. prr-rim PT. Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? ~~ If not, what would you suggest? `~N~6 ~rz~ec,rm IS D2~Jert-- ~pucwrr~ou. 'PEo~u;: F~n~ Recan~ ~Nc3~UhJw3c-Y f~t~ 2rss i ~ 3Er} ~ uD T--~C w~c-mac.. T N E cry s t f=~ 'r-+~ ~tc-wp -~c-~o 5 ~ 5, o~ CO ~ ~R-~C~ -t C~ ~ t, -C~ A-f I w? 1 ~-++ ~! I c N ~ s RF+r+ W~}Y.S7 ~ W ~ -JG--gyp M07e.~' G-~.~ f'e ~R c r-~,,~a'N~ ar tl~G ot-~ws . ~~~ L,~~ W ~u.. wt M~ 3ct'cc-,~ P~~~c~rt..s, ~T wu,~ o~~y Paula Bittinger E~co~K.(~c; rn0~ s~o~Ny . 10325 Tinsley Lane d Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Timis s~U.oY _~ d~ ~~~~~ ~/~xLy ~-v~x~~~ ~5~1 i~ ~~E" ~S iii'/t ~. ~ ~/~~ y~i~~~~ ra~''o ~~ i~ ~vo - ~ssi.~f i~~c~. u/C ~p rnorus"- ~~~ ~~ OF rrrE 7'~Cs~l~'/G ~/~xJS .~~ !~ ~v~ G~~ /~~ u/~vGU OIL y/ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the azea to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? y ~~~~ / I+E-SC ~~p~ ~'f.}-INIG ON(.y OJ= tHE moN~Y 71~c-v Cf~*~ Yr- A'1~ L - - W 1+~1(; 1~ ES T1P-0 Y / d14 W C-ri'L'~ 1-4 V f~1`t0 L 1~ . Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? `` o- W C A 2~ T~A X G--O -ro T l-1~ E ,r-7 A x~ The construction is estimated to take one to two yeazs beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? iJO 1J~ 'BE.'V c~ ~H'E '~os5 i B I LI'f y OP Y YS T'(~ K~ N5 ~Lw•c,c:- f~ C rte- . Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i. Please write any other comments or suggestions = f}m A 1-,t~7~VE ol~ CY~-re-2oU- coc~.s-rY ENO z i-tA~v~ 5~"x~ -~ t~-E D c~ -t 2~ crt r o rJ err-err Z-77 3 Qom ~i-r ro rt+A T A~r~c.^~} • n'1057 W rc pG-s-r~Y ~~`JTIt~Nr~~ So 6Uft (.~ dE~S CPr-J 3G-~orric: mp-(I~ 1-4~C-t ~ C~ PrND 5-CYZE55 GUc. ? W ~ NEC~'D To 5 t-ou~ DOuJ N (-}~'D cr~2cS-~v~~-y Co N S 1 ncs2 ~Y Ncu1 .~Dc--JC-~,0~'M~~' '~G-Fo~u 'pRoctS~O)~S~ BEC~S~` D-.ACI _C~, NA'~~~.r~ a~ Y !5 4c^~~ ~ w~ cnn~ ~eve~. ~~~ ~ Y pt~cK.. Paula Bittinger ~1'°02`~ _cj ~ 3`l 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a Road improvement. b~'.Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) lAlteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. - d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. ~r>~ ` ^ f ,~ r j~ l~cl-Q ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~___. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a~The existing roadway. b)~ A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can yon.: s>>prort ?ny of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ 7~ r i v~ ,~ die ~ N ~ ~ ~~~~--~~~'' `'~ ~'~~~ G,Y7 ~ GCS ~ ~ ~~ %~~~~~. A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of '5,-14 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,J00 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road~nstead of creating afour-lane road? ~ ,/ ~'' I ,, ylP~o~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? .,_. ~z~/'~ ~1ov p/ rr'' l G'~~ ate. ~~ ~~ ~ %~ ~ -~ ~~~~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, twe weather, ar~d we :niscella^.eous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? _ If not, what would you suggest? C~z ~l '~`~' - S/ ,~ ~- ~~~ ~~ y ~ ~'~~~~ G~ ~ ~=~ ~ ~ 1~~~~ Paula Bittin er ~ ~ ~ 10325 Tinsley Lane g /~ z Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have// the/~ potential for increased speeding? ~ t~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~;~~ ~r~v !~~ ~~vl~l Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a ~,vater shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? /~~ ~~ ^~,// . `/'~ " ~ fiC.,t~pC7~ L Oy`- C~L~-L ~ ~? ~ ~~~/14'~2~ ~-rc-Z' G.c~Y~ rT.-r~ _~ ~ ~' -err Cc-~-~ ~ ~~° ~ ~ Would you be wi ling to pay more taxes to support this type of development? - ~~ G~ ~~~ \ ~~ The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? r. ~~~ Q, ~ ~ ~~ C / °G ~ - ~ `~ ~.~- ~ war/ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~, Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane I c I Please write any other comments or suggestions ~~ ~ ~~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~,~~~ ~\s ~~~/.-~ l ~ ~,liyc j ~ ~ ~,L~. y ~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ~' Z VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? ~o n~~~. Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane } Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~~ e e ~ ~f a'S ~ t t 5 ~ ~V ~ t~~ T tit Edcl 1 ~ ~~ t5 U n,q~CCe-5 s q r / A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,~~1~ The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~e ~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? y~~ Between Januazy 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six reaz-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? 'N Q If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane a Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? ~ ~ 15 1 ~ . ~ Q ~, Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? No The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ti VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) Alteration of a rural azea into a suburban azea much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? ;q - Seems ~o be. fh ~ /Ylc~ f ~'~,St ~-F'~cc ~:v~ Gv~t L1 LC/' d ~ '~!- b -c. a .~ m ~:,, y ~ ~ t ~„ t-r~~ S: ~{S ~~ ~ ~ ~° ~ ~er~crrctc( ~.v, ~{-h ~ rc/;u~ ~~/ ~ n-~~Jlo~~c~y~cz~7`' Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~'rtu~l;r~~ ~~:'~ rd~~ -~~~~ /~'Ivrei f~~zz yc; y~«~, ~~ -- ~- v~ been, n~ J ~,~ ~ w: ~H ~g ~~~ y , / 1 /7 /~ c PQSS~ n<j y/nPS, ~~t,`~ c/Cc1`C,, S ~?e e~F' ~ f~'~G/ !~ L? /~C: C'S , -S G /yj c 'f h ~ f^ ~ h .P E <#~ S ~ ~ ~- plc 1J P~ A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 374 Z . The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conju//nction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~nI S /n 4.~-/ j<.'c'.'/G 4L LLC;,.-~d C~S'~'~l ~~rL( ~Jl~ L~S :h Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? nn l G'c~n GO~Z i n/ sr ~ om .~ tai r-ll ~ ~ e cis ~' h ~ c~~ n- e~,,A/ / Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed .objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ~~~. ~n y,~~~ ~"~iere/ GZ/`~ /~2v/-e-. C~-~^S' %/' C~ C'c-~J'c~s~~-~ If not, what would you suggest?~ ~~ ~ ~ ¢''~ ~ S ~' ~ ~ `f ~°''•~' ~ G~~' `~~'~ Q~cf ie~ ~-~c.,~~ Td~, many C~i<tn~~S~ ~`s~;n~ i~ V / ` V ~G,S S , /~~ /4 /7L S `~ S~~ r <~°, /7 <j ~1 D f ~l t'c'</- `) rj S~Qtd ~;m%fs. ~.5,~ f~~~ d>~;ry -arm F~~Pi~ 1-~ ~~y C~~i~~ ~ef on ~~l (Qur,-~~ lush h~~=~ Paula Bittinger L I 10325 Tin.~~yey Lane 7h i S ~' ~ Q c~ i S n r f ~ f/ 0 S fd n <~ a, otj fi t; fly- c~ l(/rtCkn ~ D -f ~-r~ f~~ c;, l~ d s/i a~c~c~el S~aC f1 I: Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? 1 a 2 i/~ ~o~,,,~/~~n ~ ~ w ~ ~~ ~~'- ~~ t h ~~ / f~.cs ~ 5'~~ c~ ~~ ~~e ~Yn E - ~ Q' c* n -~- k h rZc. 1ti n '~ r lC ~- e- /1 a -t- S P ~ c'~-Q ~ f ~' ' f'! ~ ~ a _ ~ ..U ~ ~M .~ c,' G e ~-, ,~n ~' 1i vu rS ~ ~' e'1 Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? /~~Y ~~~~~ ~erL i .~ /~~~ Q.v~.-~~/~~o f u.-; // b ~ d ~v c. l~'~~ r ~ So ~d /1 d /a1a-~r~ wh~~ f1~-c~ /`G~ ~ ~( C'~d7r.~i-~/~~ s a S' ~~` s Would yotf be willing~to pay more taxes to support this type of development? f"d~kr~ ~/7C'/'.~u..s ,~ ~!/eNy y~°.a-i- GC/Jy ~vay 6 ~J ~"i~ ~~ ~ J / ! / f ~ _ /L ~~ C' U ~2 r1 u ~-- The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Q~~~h~ ~ /~~~ ~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i ~x Please write any other comments or suggestions ~ ~ ~~ -t'~n~~~~~ n e ~~ P /a .-, ~ b ~ r arm ~S ShUlc~ ~~i~v f~~ -F~t~, iS ~~JJ d-H usf ~.nuo%Ci ~, ~..,- ~~ ~ ~xf r/1 cC of ~ ~ ; s c~~ ~s r~ J l=ip ~~ ~~ .~,~ i, ~~ y ` ~ /. ~~ /j~O.S / ~ cr7.C .s 2R O/d j. ~G~ Pi7 i/I < 1V ~j,~~ ~~ fr ~ ~J /h r~sJz ~ ~~ ~~ , s v~h;~~es, ~~~ fps{~.~ ~~ /~ a st ~ ~~~ ~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane it VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a1an: a Road improvement. b Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept aJs it is? What would your reasons be? Cl / ~ 7v ~ ~ v 2 L°'h ~c3 ¢ n 7` J1~, `~ h ~, ~~Y 17~" S (~ C~CC ,,t~'i, ~ /l) ~ ~- ~ 2, ~ tc.~ ~- ,Ji~ ~ ~ ~ q /~ ,1 ~ c=am c~. LZC~ i n ~'' ~ j L~.,~C~ /~i1~~,~ l ~"1yre7Y~ ~ YZ~t~,Ej~ . A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,'72 The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~2~~ TL> ~-K~ ~Er-e ~~5~ (f1 ~t ~~ 7L 1~L1 3/ Y'e- j n~~ Y~~~ V~Jm.~.,~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? n / _ ~ tu'~~ /n c rea ~ e cw If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane I r, Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? G. ~~ Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? lt1`L ~ C;c, Lie ;~ ~ ~1~7~~°rc~7` ~- ~V ~, ~.~~ ~ ~- ~~ s , The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? y~. / 5 ~r./ l~ / l~~ ~/ c ~V~ j~G~Y GZ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a~ Road improvement. (~b i Prelude to residential/commercial development. c)' Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane r 1' Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~~ ~:~~-Ci.c~L-tii~L•1.r,.L .~~'="t~~;.'.{ _~~. .~,-!L£~Li. ,r/~71~'~~',~ ,~'t~c.=~Gt~r.slc'-~ G~L~G"~~~~~L l..Lv'll~ ,f,..'"t~X% L.~ /~ . ~-L~. ~~ ~k Y.`~ .. ;,'~.C r..%~ ~ .. }~Ji.i~ / r... 11 ~~1-C ~ ; ~ ~-- ~'~'' ~'e f /"' ` X L ` ~ /~:~ ~s .'/rat ; ~~ • ' ~ ~ t7('" ~(.Z~ .,+= ,.'-f°u:' !Yvl.C7Jt'L'~. Gt-L~.~f ~i,t c.c. ; ~i~i L !tc i,:LC ~~~ ~~/~~ yr~ y rc..~~C~~ ~ ` A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of T,,-)+{ Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ... ~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ~ ~_ ~ .. ~ . T ~ ~ ,;:~ 1 .,1.~1~ ~~~ -c ~ ~ z cif' ~ G~~~~ ~-~;~ /~=c' If not, what would you sugges~tj? ~ (~ / ~ - rte.:, ~, i~. `~ '": j' /' t ~ ~ f l x ~,vL .~'~~ / ' `~ ~~/`~~2' -(l'.l -~+..~:~L;.. ~ __ ~.t' ~ -1' Ci•~,,,/~ ~C-l ,*~i.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ r~lL VL~ ...cL~ ~ ~ l .rL/l. ,~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane t Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the azea to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? .,~, Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? .~ ~~ .~ The construction is estimated to take one to two yeazs beginning concerns do you have about the actual construction process? 1 l~; ~~ ~~.~ .~2Z t/ 2~ D~~ ~~~,C Paula Bittinger in the year 2000. What `~ , /~ r j i ~ ~ ~ - (/ 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ~y i~ ~, VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? ~~ ~ ~~. 6a 6 ~ ~.~~ ~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? U ~ ilcA~o~ ~~,/~ ~ in ~ SGr C'd - ,8'i-.ta. A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3, 74 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~ ~~ ~ CI/L10/~ ~9'YL f+'1~/f ~" ~~ ~/ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ' !v ~ ~~ ~ ~ 8.,~~ ~~~~t~c- ~~'~.~ r~e~-ruY-~ ~u~~ ~ !~s-rt , ,d~.rv~ Gar. If not, what would you suggest? ~ ~- ~~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~~ 5 ~ ~~,~-,~., lg9/~ ~ t~cl- ~~~r~.~ ~-/.~ ~S- ~p r !~'~ ~ • r Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? Woul~you be will g to pay more taxes to support this type of development? ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~s , tic- ~~~ ~'~`'~ . a,/ f.~y~ b~,c ~c ~SC , The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions C ~ ~ c~~-~- ~, i.~- Gv~ ~;~ ~' ~~ ,off Jam- ~°~ ~'`~ ~ f ~~ ~ ~ _~, Paula Bittinger ~~~w~~ 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. b) Prelude to residential/commercial development. Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d Other (please state). You may circle more than one. ~ . 1 bc~~rvc ~1~-e Nvr~h~ly P"oQose+~ pvojrc~ is s i~ r~5p~sc Cor veac~'~o~ -~o ~~e bccCH~ vtt~d cN~' -e l g+o~a~ (S'-l o y~r~s ~ i ~• i~~e C~:ck Gr«I~c /S/~a . VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Possibly (R ~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? 1~5~ {~OuJIOtIN~ gV~~O~ 1•~ ~C Bs~ CVGpd~` 2~tb ~1~5 SCV'NCI1/ ~W1ra~sG TMe ~~~ ~~ T'~t VOa.G1 ~O/ '~ W ~D VdG 1T1 . A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,71 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? I -1'`n~;,i~e T~1~~ is ? `~ovg~~ c.Jo/~~ 01" co~•.sidPVeTrc~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~i Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? ~~s If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~e 5 Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? Nod t~ -F?vo~ off' ~w~v<<s~~ C~Ne`op~~~ Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? No __.. The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? 1~1o.ne Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane f VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identif~~ issues, conditions. and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised b~° the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is aian: a Road improvement. b) Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. T~,ES,E ,e~si o~n/nA ~ ~6eEAs -Svf3i.~/ V/ ,o E~ f -~r~rr~ o r~.~ f~rz-err ~',v° S /NC-2EA~E ~-'OUNT~ ~T/z~7tl T~"XFS I~UE 7?> .SER-V/ cE5 ~ ,~TL' . ~ TAE CQV~t/r~y /7~ r/S'r ,~dPP~ `l FOB /-~~-Z1J /2E5lOE~i./T$ " ' Pf•~SQN~ ~' S ~a~ a v~~o~.~r~'s ~ ~°,~A-~ ~-,e~~~ .Em~xq~v~y~~ ~D 2~3u/E ,Sv~~-oi~YrfS, ~v~Pir~.~/T ~D,~ ~~yevvNVS, ,5~~ f-tv~ ~iG1G/r"!ES VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c} A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? 1`(D ~~Ff/G ,L/GjfiTS ,4T ~~V/~Y-7IZAVEI~DR-OVA /~YT~~S6c-TTONS o~i~foU[-D REDUCE TRAFF/G ~PE6~//~1~/'~ r}ZI~F~G //YC~RF$S A~/O t~R~SS P~Br-on 5 , f} CvvPLE OF `"T1J/Z.~! L+4~/6 lYl AtiJ 8E USEFUL /n/ ~E7t-5 ~v~ ft5 G~p7'"TOK ft/LL lZDf}D /1-iV0 OLD /j'I~LG ~/~ ~~T IrAT/E LEFT jve~/S ~Ro/rt 3uv~N,Ba~~vO ~~~iC - A 7'~4Ff'iG G/l~'ffT ~T ~or'r'oN fF/LL jLDA'D ItJ~LL /yEGP ~FFiG ,E,~/T~~it~lp ~-'f 22/ `2o/n ,ems ~. Y~r~ ~ ~s o Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane `~~a ~~ ,: S ~--: . Vliould you like to sce the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? L! F~ 7~T y~s~ A ~-LPFNk. ycflLL ~~57k~`/ ~/f~ 6~,(/~ ~ ~~E Op/r~E~T O!= I,~ s; W, CvrJNT`f C..T~z.~xs ~(So7, E.r(ce~v'e'4-~q'i ~' c vv~ ~-X~S QUIZ DI Sfi-PPE~R-i'~ J~' ~ Fi~'e-/n ~fr-ivl~ , GviG OGi FE 1 f'2! Yfr ~ L /~YG ~2~A"SE A-~rz~}o y ~/~-,ems y r~~ ~~'~ES~ i.~ Th-E sr~ ~ ~P r~fE-~,e.~ /yIR~K.~iYSs' l~ /YIO/~ DiFF~'CV~T ~D~ /nA'~`~ aJi7h~% D -~f¢EF~i~ ,~~Lt~n~l`' To 06-I~FLO~E7~ O f fD/~ES ~iVO LR-i/O ~ ~~ GS cif ~ P ~roliJ, /YIO/~E TD ~E~~ OF LESS T!T-XED COvtIT/~S~ I{~i~ 20,B~E~' A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,`1tlZ The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane roados sn dEOf~o`vnof uiF /T'ais D61~~i~.~D .~.A. r y;e~FFiG L/C~ ~r5 A'~ /Yo T A ,~7n~D y, T1-fE~ /5 fro T ~~ Ff/G f}-T P~S~xlr T~-T R~aiv~2Es ~~ SvinP~ ~ Q v~nP~- ~" ~~~ q-f A-l~- , ~FoldlvE~ ~ TffE GOLn/~'`/ fff!-5 SEA ED ~ ~~ ZoN/may ~e~e P~S~sr~T ~D EF~~~rr~~s? ,D~~/~~Py~~S . ``~~~/,~//i~/~ ~ ~ /ELa~~,lets ~,C~i/v/~ o ~`Fl~~/"c~« ~rr~5 fa~j~ T~fE7~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ,/~ s ~ . Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? r(o~ If not, what would you suggest? .T2A- t'Fi c ~-~y/~S ~ ~~EC~2~4S~ .SPFEU < im ~ T3 ~ ~ R~~S .~vCft ~ Cadnr~Y ~/A-y 1T~~E~ ~'l~lfFiE~-OS ~rrr A~ 77.~EG/E aC~ocC lGYoB ~v,~-o~~ 3 5 m.~.f! Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane /. Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? E S/~E~ ~ - !k T PrZ-ESa ~ A Y~ra<c!~ 7~4 vEG /n~c ~ /~.s . 1..~rn < r ,~ v~ r~ o .~ ~ rUA- fta~J ~~ to ~« `~ p~-s s ~/ L L i4-G Low ~~ dI~EFD<n~rf' ~T~~'FF/ ~ OFFs~ ~E /~/C~-S~ W i ~ ~ ~i i6 ,Q.E Vim! vE Fpm -SPEEDi~rj ~ ~,cES ,~,/o~ CovNrz! ,ExP~s65' Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However. there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? /~,E ~,t~E~- A'n/~ ~" ~o~ ~s d~ ~ ~Ev ~r~y, /Yt~~v~mvm ~o> .~~ zE, ~~arr.~t~2~ O7J ~ G'UV~t! rti/ ~ ~ Ov2 Poc+~T6oo~S . V~lould you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? 7`(0 / QU2 TAX ~~ ld /L c- ~vPPolz-r C'OvN'Tz/ PE~2sa~/N~Z ~?~i/ j~EOELo/~ERS wN~ L~ONT7~/U ~ ~~Na~ ov~c- cQoR-ur-~l aF L~F~~ ~~Nc~ dvR- Covn/r``/~ o 6 U~ .SA~FE'r- y r Ov2- P2d i°~,e-r"~1~ The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? ~,E~.A~Ys, OF ~U,esE f /N >Yozrn~- L 77zA-FF/ ~ FL-ouJ .~,~3~d~v./ OF P,eo~~~y i DE /lfl~i~~vi/ OF f~-D SO~</<~~' ,~~r,~sT po ~ ~v nom/ OF ,5~~-~- G~ ~-~ HvLo~s R~/D A-iUt9 i r'S 7~ B Uri-«'s Dvu "~~ FLooOi~~ p~roOS 5`Ly-rclC~' /N ~7~5 ~ ~i~-i s A-ivo ~~~s- L Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane W~-~ pops ~,a~,,coK~ C:tx~`~`I 5 -mac v~ir~~ C~ r~ z~5 ~pY~Y A+vr~ ~2,vq-~rr~/ OF LiF~ Go ~v~rH //YC~SED .D,~ v~,OP/NE~ ? ~N`I~S Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: Road improvement. ,~, Preh~de t~ residential/commercial development ~_-_ Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Ca_n you s»ppnort~a_ny of these corridors? If yes, which one? ~ `^-~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i ~. ~~`~-~ ~.L+L.t~` Cam. 11 \ E~~ ~--Y~, r 1 Q V~J ~ 1~~~ ~-L 1 1 . ~~~_-~ ~ ~~ i~~ ~~ r Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? . 5 c~ ~~~ ~,(,m ~~~,,,7j ('.~,~,~ lam, a,`~-'~ ~ ~.L ~ A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3, Z 4Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? nU. Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? 116-% C'~C.-t-w l f~-t c"~ 5~~~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three s eedin ,fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five ;~~isceilar~eous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? n0 If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 1 X325 Tinsley Lane ~l 1~- ~j l~,Gtti-_) Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? ~ . ~ ~ ~~~- ,1 •• ' , "r ~~+C.. ~,~;~,ll ~V1~-~~ C ` '~ I I..~L.W,' ~~l(~1 ~~`-~'`"~~J l¢ ~ `1 1~' ~~~s~~~ r1 ' - ~ ,-~ h~„ ~ou you be willing (to pay more taxes to support t~is type of development? ~U . The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? , ~t~~L ; Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsle}~ Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane r VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: Road improvement. b Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i~ Would you like to see the road ept as it is? at ~yo~reaso~ e; A ~_ ~~- ~- ~ . ~~~ A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of ~,~ 4 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~ t Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? .~- ' Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you fee a four-lane road would decrease a accident rate on Route 221? ~ .~- ~, ~ j ~~ , ~ ~ ~- S `f ~-e. ,~,p If not, whit woul you suggest. . S Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i~ Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afoot-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~^ OOO///"` V~+~~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? _ r ~ /~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ - - " Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginni g i the year 2000. Whit concerns do you have about the actual construction process? ~~ , ~- Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: oad improvement. ~ h~~ ~~- -L~ ~~~ b Prelude to residential/commercial development. Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Y Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,-742 The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? N ~~ -c~~~w(~ ~Jt ~'YS~- ~L~J,~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ,~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six reaz-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? If not, what would you suggest? Y y}---~ ~t.,'Il~t, 51~1v~, J -2 ~ (,Cu ~S 1~w:37-~ ~ p vt,~~ ~ (C~l /- Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ,~ Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? n p ~ I _ _ ~ 1~- Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? y~,D The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane I, Please write any other comments or suggestions e ~ ~ y~ ~K c s ~-'~~ Yv a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ c wI '~- BSI ~-. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f u ~ S r~~-~J' ~° J Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. ~; Prelude to residential/commercial development. Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: ~~ The existing roadway. ~ b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i v Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? j / ,= --- / ~~~ j. ~ " ~~ ; l d ,'{ ~ ~ ~rn Ore G+1 ~ .ff ~ rte., ~, ~, ~. , Q L( ~. !~') Cf S5 7~r c? n , , ~ ? • .:c <~ ; .~ ..~ >~ r ^ ~.~> a ~ c'-- Ss n~-2 ~r-*,- .. . A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,~y Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~' J Do you feel more study is needed to justify his ~ nstruction? ~ ~~ ~ dom. - f .,, ~ ~ d~~, ,,/ ,,, t h-E ~~ ~ s -~i K,l~l b ~c K f d ~' L ~ r~ '~ ~ '~ ~c- ` ~ /r 's, v n „~__ Between JanuaMry 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the propose construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route V2 J2~~ ~ J ~ d ~ C~-rk ~ s~ ~~ ~ s o~ 4 ~ S ~ r ~ ,Y., If not, what would yotK suggest S %' { ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , . ,\~ Paula Bittinger ~ 10325 Tinsley Lane ,~ .a ~ C..r.. ._ ~.~CYi,.~-~Cvf--- ,r .. ti ~ ~.: c. f i~- ~ + ~ .._ _ - T/ I~ ~~ Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afoot-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ,~J,~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? _ Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this _tyQe of development? ~ ` ` -; _. r , The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What ~;=', concerns do you have about the actual construction process? ~ A ~i/vifi ~~(~ ~ b' ~ 1, ~ ~L ~ %%h../~ ~~,,~-- ;lU~ ~~ ~ t~ l~__~ ~°~" -„ p' 1 Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i ~,~ VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. by Prelude to residential/commercial development. ~c).. ~ Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) _ A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i~ Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on ,February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,74 2.- The criteria VDOT uses to construct a four- ` lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in ~,, conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? .~ w ~~ ~ ~ ? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? we .ti " Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? ~CS j ' _ -- If not, what would you suggest? cc~ not ~ .c~gne Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane bake ~~~ °~e~ta~ ~~. ooa cot~~ave Abe 4 atie g . v1~>> co e s4 ~ • ~M ~ o a c°'as~~ ~~tih Abe sa'y' 1~, S ~~` `"~ `, ~ ~ ose oaa - ~ _~'~ ~.~ z `'~ r Sorg Abe ~ ou ,awe ~ a ~°''" ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~eveY, ayes a feed a ~~ ~ ~~~ ay • ~° aec~ae S4eea ~° 4eedit~~ • ~o w ~,; . tib~b~s ~ C `~"ry ~'~es~ae~ttr~s a b~ teased SQ' a ` w ~ lrut>>>~~e Z abo 1~~ off e~ abov vti °v ate ° y iatie .~~~'S~'e tis 1 o'4e'~o~e ~°~ a ,~° ~~e ° ae~e~°~~C'~S c°o s~b~e ~ L' ~e ertly ~'~ age ~~ ~ c`~°Se~.N~'a~ ~s 4 ~'^~ s cu4 sro'~ ~a°t ~ ea ~o ,~ ~ e, ~e,~~~ ke C°`~'a a v~ate~e a c°~ cotri4~ • S} ~ ` ' e~ 04 R°~'e ~S a~eeuti~ ~t~e a ~e~o'Q'~'e~ Md 5~ i~ 5 ~S ~y~e °~ a tb o~~d c~a~ .~ ,~ tb t aid cofi~e~t~ `~ ~, `" °~~ axes to Sv4'~o ae~e~o4 t~°~e t. to ,day .N>>>irg ~ ,l~c~ d y°° be ~e \'~ ~1 °u, ~}~S°~ beg~~~~4 ats o'ae to ~t ~ ~~°cess~ a do taka1 c°~sttuc or is es a~aut the actin 0 co~s~~ct~ o base b c, 'She s a° y ~ ~~ ~~` co'~°e~ ~o`~~My w B,tt~tLget 4av~a 0325 Tinsley Lane Paula BittingeT VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? r A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3, ~ ~4 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~~~.d ~.~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Y Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? «~~~ ~~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions ! ~~ o , ~~~~- iYYt~iv~/ ~~~ J Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. b) Prelude to residential/commercial development. c~ Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? ~ (7 Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane r r Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 'S,~ ~{ Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ,~ 2S Betv~~een January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? ~~ If not, what would you suggest? ~1oc ~ ~ o~~ ~~ c ~ ~ ~e-'~ S ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~C'~ 'C'am , eo t~s'~ b le \ -~ n-~-1\~ ~~ c~~ ~ ~ vQ~C's vrt ~'-~ "l _ 1 ~ ~- Paula Bittinger -~ ~,.,e ;~,~e e~ ~~ ~ ~ ~°~~ 10325 Tinsley Lane ~~- ~ Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? -~~ Un~,~ { Q ct S e c~ ~~ s~ e~ a- 5 ~-- c~ ~ e ~ S ~ <~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to whaat is possible now. How do you feel about this development? ~ ~-~-e i --~' ~ \l~v ~ `~~~ S ~ u~- ~\ Se-~~ ~~ `~ ~~Je~}Qr , ~hc~z_ cX~rncz ~ ~2 ~ Comic\us~.~ r. ~ ~'F~ i\ ~ I '(^ ~5~k ~ c~ci ~~ ~ ~ r~~ i t~ lr-(e- -}-l.'~q.~-S C~ r'-~-t~ fl - iS C~ ~'~' -~2 Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? ~ v The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? ~_ ~ ~~-~-1 ~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane i~ VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residentia commercial developme~ c~' Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? V'o u--rtc.,~1G~,~ w~ '~ ~- ~ bk~ l~~ v~ a ~'h~-'s Paula Bittinger L ~ r~ d' S to v -~ ~~p T D ~ / '~ G ~ 1C IJ ~ J ati, er cs ~ Gn ~ ~..,,,k~„~ 1~ o u Yv c~ ~ 'rl~.2r IY~~„~^-~ ~k I -Ire- f ~' ~ c~ h ,~, ~{ . J. c r'' ~ fe. v~ q ,~- ~ 325 Ti Lane ~' ~ L p yv b f P,ti,. S S ~~~ w j ~'^~ "~~ ~ w ~~'` ~ t,~e ~b c1~,~c~ ~~ rKG.~ d- ~ cn S I nc ~ S ~ 's'"-~~---. ~. t ~,..~ ~-i ~ ~~~ S Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? , / ~ ~ ~q Cl~ !~-r~ ~ i 5 CL Y'P-S ~ i~~,,.~.~ rJ~R-c~. ~ ,,. ~ (~Q. , ~-y ~. `T - Q~-,-~ c~.titi'--`-~-~-1/ ~~S - A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,7(2 The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? ~ ` L ~~,., ~,,,~-~ der--L~.,.,.~Q - ~'~,-.. hbt -~- I ~ ;~-~-~~-~:: '~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~ ~~ Between Janu 1, 1992, and~November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed ~' construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ~ ~ ~p ~ r:f ~~~/l i ~~~ j-~ wi^'(~( S J ~../ ( ~ ~ O cwt r ~ ~ .f ~t Yc~.,,.-cam ~ . If not, what would you suggest? ~~~ LI~~S ~ Paula Bittinger ,r,~~J,r'e ~` I `/`fir 0 ~ vv~ o f ~ S Z/~r e J 10325 Tinsley Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? e~ ~e ^~ i f Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? ~ 5 ho~ ~~~~ ~~ W~ ~~ Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of. development? N~~ The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Z ~~,~~,~a V~Nef+ -n~~t ~~ ~~~a' ~ri~,lrN~t~, f„~n~(s be (~i~~ t~ ~ ~e ~osf o~ ~,o .~„y b~,. bloc '~r~~rs~'~,.ti s. -~ jti,c C~....+/. P ~~ c ~ fi -mss ~~ ~ 5 ~ ~y ~s~ ~~ ~~ ~ s ~ ~a~~ ~~ ~~ p ~ {/ _--- ~y ,~ ~ ~ . ~~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ~~~~ ~.~1~ ~~ ~~ ~b~~~e ~ ~s S ~~ c, r U a 1, v t l,~ ~!~( 1/ t c' y j'1 ''`J vt'`~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r o w~ ~_ ~ vV' 1l ~ jl ~L,.. VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? /~ ~~ h n o ><' ~x~/tG~, ~:~1« r~ F~. r e ~ ~ r . ~~- SGT r"yl / J {~ ~ r t /U(as c}., _ r,~- rat rte. ~~ /~-n ho~~- o~ (~. ~ „9 -~~ S ~d ~ . i~c~u~ ~~ ~ ~~~ `~` ,-n ~~t~.~' a-re ~t-- ~~ r~~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? I~ e~ I r~ r '~'~'~ ~u~ ~e:; . L Wou.l4t r1o~CQ ~a~ ~~ Pcc~~es Far+~- ~i,~h~~ is ~,5, ~owl~. b~ ~reserv~c~ , ~Isc ~N1~.-~ l~rn~h'~~ ~-1~.. access ~i5~~-'~'~-~' ~ Gl~i~~~'~a~ ~Su,bctr~cc~~ S ,~~ac~~ -~ ~~ a~e~ ~Lcu.(d C ,J F A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,~~! Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? yes . (,~ 11 Cp u~,r e ~"~-h -rno r e (~~ t,~t~ sr ~ i.J ~ ~ ~>~t U~e-~.~tf ~ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? ~~ S Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221? ~rz /Vo - Wou.fd Just i~~erease ~ sPe~d ~-I'lu2sz f ~~P~e dr~u~ ~- rna.k-~- -~ ~n ~~~'~ - If not, what would you suggest? L.,'~°n ~ ~- -~ur/~i.c r ~.e vel of ~n,~;~ f adc~~ fTC.~xal ~'a ~~i'L . ~n ~rc°_.E. all ul~n9 ~~ ~ ~ r,~f ,~~cs f Paula Bittinger s~e~ l%rna f- Cif SCf'ovLs for k- af-- ,5y1 10325 Tinsley Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? yes Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? / .Tf ~S Uii~1,~ ~t'S-SCp.ry . Cti~ y np{' ~~'-G ~'L(,~ ~~k~' Qi'eas I~DcU1G~ Ceu-~ ~ ~r ~idc(~`},`c~a.! f~csl~ei~a~/L~~~nn~~~ia/ ~15e. Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? 1 4~~ ` The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? 7"lt,~. ~ssl -~ c~21 a-y s ~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 7~2 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: ~j Road improvement. b) Prelude to residential/commercial development. c) Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane L Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? ~~. _~ A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 199 showed an ADT of 3,~ 4 Z- . The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road? j ,~ .~a/ Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction'? ~~-~`e~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? -, If not, what would you suggest? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development'? The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process? Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane Please write any other comments or suggestions Paula Bittinger 103? Tinsley Lang M VDOT is currently evaluating a construction project for Route 221 from where the current four- lane ends to Route 752 (Poages Mill), with future plans to continue to the foot of Bent Mountain. A Citizen Advisory Committee was formed of residents along the 221 corridor. I was invited by VDOT to be a member of this Committee to help identify issues, conditions, and opinions and to gather ideas and concerns from the Bent Mountain Community. The following questionnaire is a result of questions and issues that have been raised by the advisory group. Please write your comments and return it to me so I may bring it to our next meeting. Thanks! The construction design VDOT is considering for this project is a four-lane road with a median strip which will require 125 feet of right of way (current roadway is approximately 50 feet). Do you feel that this construction project is a/an: a) Road improvement. Prelude to residential/commercial development. c Alteration of a rural area into a suburban area much like Route 419. d) Other (please state). You may circle more than one. VDOT has three corridors under study for this construction project: a) The existing roadway. b) A corridor southeast of Route 221 across Back Creek. c) A corridor along the ridge west of Route 221 connecting with the same alignment of Route 690 (Poage Valley Road). Can you support any of these corridors? If yes, which one? N~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ~y"~` °ur reasons bey G~c~ ~ what would !~ c.,~ ~ s~f~""v r e road kept as it is ~ ~'7 _ ~~ e th s,.~`~ . to se Q,,~~ ~, y r li~ /ry / -, ~ ~ ch~°- would y°u ,`~'" - O~ ~ ~ aily ,~ ~ ~/ / owed pvetag ~ on ~ / poage Valley e~ t of Be~on pct a f Quin 1994, at taken at th pT uses tO roadway n on DecembSr lA traffic cO The criteria uDng the existing fflc cOUnt taki0'382 vehiD~, of 3~~y ~ alternate pa fob-lane TOad.~ti~0~v •~'' P' tta AD 1995 sh°wed an ~o y°u f a~or d tang ~~ ~ Traffic ( DT ~~`- . e road tnstea oJ(~,`~~-~`~~ F ebru oa pis 8,p04 ~ two-lan a ~,o ~~~~~~~` d w ir',`~,,,~ lane ction with a . , `~~ . conjure J ~,,"""_ _ n I _ ~~^ %~~ ~,, ,...y ~ /~ strnction? ~ this con ~ ~ ~~ is needed t~ust~f~~~~~(a'ti`' ~~~~~ ore study ~~ d / m~ ~~~~ Do y°" fee ~R/"`~ ~ `' u,Li`~ ' d l,~o Q~Cr~''~" - ropose ~~,rZ4~' ~" '`'r~~ in the p accidents four head ed e were 3l one angle' teen fix vember l ~ 199n~ludee~ six re non ollisio ce of alc hoh three No ns thre uen and collis~° fl January l' l The six type loe °pp°s'te ereec s x'undescel ane us• e road Between corr~dor• red `~'~ d five ml four lan construction ol), °norsf cto S 1 wo weatheT° an r do you feel a alcoh (all pct of°fa road)driMr ~nah'ention, t in~ol~ed dti~er eno , oboe frfteen of the causes ~ ~~~-~ - speeding~ Route 22l ~`° a or portion to on ~ci~~ Given that the e h accident ra ~,,,.v - /`- - ~ would decreas n~~,,~ky ~~ ~,17'~` Quid y°u suggest ~~'~"~.~ ot, what `N ~/' If n ,~~GF~,,,O . ~ 10325 Tinsley Lane ~~~~ paula girtinger speed studies alon limit. DO g the proposed increased s y°u feel afour-lane Construction corridor Feeding? road with the same speed lim~od compliance c>`v will With the speed have the potential for R°an°ke Count there ' y currently has ~s already a Water sho no Mediate to provide utilities rtage in t Plans t° put in and CO once a co ~'O develo utilities with t mmercial develo rr~d°r is chosen. Pments on Route his rOadwa . deve]opn1ent? Pment com This could o 221' The CO y HO~'ever, Pared to what is Pen the area to . linty may decide ~~~~._ ~ ~~~~ possible n°~, How dojncreased residential r„-,~ %~~ ~t~,~i,,~,~~~~ you feel about this Would you be c~v willing to PaY more taxes to ~~~ support this type of develo --a., ~* The construction is concerns do estimated to you have about the take °ne to ~ actual construction years beglnnin /~j~-~ ~ Process? g 1n the year 2000. ,° ~`~-r--.~-J`'oyr what ~~ Paula Bittinger 10;25 Tinsley Lane r Please write any other comments or suggestions .ZT ~'~~ CZ`s' ,~ ~ _ ~~ -~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ Paula Bittinger i x'25 Tinsley Lane VDOT is currentl lane ends to Y evaluating a co A Citize Route 7S2 nstruction n Advisory Co(Poages Mill), with project for Route 221 by uDOT to be a mmittee was formed Lure plans to continue torthe 'here the current fou _ to gather ideas member of this Co of residents aloe foot of Bent r is a result o f and concerns from thee $ ittee to help identi g the 221 corridor. Mountain. comments and Testions and issues ent Mountain Co ~ issues I was that ~ conditions, and ° invited turn it to have been mmunity. The followin Pinions and me so I raised by the The const maY bring it to advisory grow g questionnaire ruction design VDOT , our next meetin P' Please strip Which will re g. Thanksi write your quire 125 is cOnsiderin You feel that this const feet of right of g for this project is wa (u17'ent ro a four-lane road ruction project is a/an: Y c adway is aPProximat with a median Road improve Prelude ment' ely SO feet). Do c to residential/co Alteration of mmercial d) Other (please stateal area i a suburb lopment. nto an area much like Rou You maY circle to 419. more than one. • VDOT has three corridors and er study for this construction a) The existin b) A CO g roadway. project: rr'idor southeast of c) 690 (oaor along the ridg ~, e 221 across Back C ge Valley Road , est of Route 221 reek. C ) connecting with the ~; ~i you support same alignment of any °f these corridors? If Route yes, which one? C7 Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane 1 'r Would you like to see the road kept as it is? What would your reasons be? A traffic count taken on December 16, 1994, at Poage Valley Farm showed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 10,382 vehicles. A traffic count taken at the foot of Bent Mountain on February 7, 1995 showed an ADT of 3,`74 Z The criteria VDOT uses to construct afour- lane road is 8,000 ADT. Do you favor an alternate plan using the existing roadway in conjunction with a new two-lane road instead of creating afour-lane road`?~1 Do you feel more study is needed to justify this construction? G ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~xz~~ ~ ) v -r 1 w...~cl i .''`~'° ~ Between January 1, 1992, and November 1, 1994, there were 31 accidents in the proposed construction corridor. The six types of collisions include: six rear-end, one angle, four head-on (all involved alcohol), one side swipe opposite direction, three noncollision, and sixteen fixed objects (off road). Major factors involved were: six under the influence of alcohol, three speeding, fifteen driver inattention, two weather, and five miscellaneous. Given that the major portion of the causes involved driver error, do you feel afour-lane road would decrease the accident rate on Route 221 ? ~ } If not, what would you suggest? -e-c.. ~2. ~ ~c.~•~ ~ ce-~e~d~E~..~ Kra ~_ -~-e ~-,-~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ' er 10325 Tinsley Lane Paula Bitting I, Speed studies along the proposed construction corridor indicate good compliance with the speed limit. Do you feel afour-lane road with the same speed limit will have the potential for increased speeding? ~ ~ n~ Roanoke County currently has no immediate plans to put in utilities with this roadway. However, there is already a water shortage in two developments on Route 221. The County may decide to provide utilities once a corridor is chosen. This could open the area to increased residential and commercial development compared to what is possible now. How do you feel about this development? VQ.1/~ ~~~~y~ Would you be willing to pay more taxes to support this type of development? l ~b • The construction is estimated to take one to two years beginning in the year 2000. What concerns do you have about the actual construction process ~~- 15 ~~ ~~ ~ 1 ems---~- ~-~- ~,% ~ ,P~r 4(`~ -P,c :~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane ti Please write any other comments or suggestions ~~a ~~~~ ~~a~° ~ ~, (~ ~~z 2 Z ~ 1 GG~~ ~~~-- ~ c~o.~ c~-~c-~ ~~~- ~` ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~`~ ~ i~~ ~~~ ~ G/~ ~~°~ ~ °'~ ~G~~ a-~ ~~ ~~'~ GHQ p~ G~l' ~ ~.. ~~,~ Paula Bittinger 10325 Tinsley Lane MAR-14-95 TUE 12:26 PM OAK GRO~JE ELEM 772 757$ P.01 OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5005 GRANDIN ROAD EXt., S.W. Rc~ANO{SE, VIRGINIA 24018 To: F'ax ~:_ 7`71 - ,Z/ g. Company: Attention: ~~~~~~ ~~ _ From: ~'ax ~ 7'72--7578 Date: / Pages to ,Follow: - ~ _ Margaret S. Moles, principal. of Oak Grove >~,lementary School in ~toanoke county, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished princ~.pal by the Vixgit~ia Association of Elementary School Principals. The award was presented at their annual conference in Williamsburg, VA on Tuesday, March 7. Mrs. MO].QS was nominated by her school and PZ'A. She was judged on interpersonal skills, resource management skills, and human resource development and was required to show evidence of effective leadership and community involvement. The accomplishments Mrs. Moles considers most significant include being principal, of and maintaining the high standards of a nationally recognized 81ue Ribbon School, pioneering the School Rer-ewal Project for the southern Association of Colleges & Schools, and helping to establish and being an active participant in tha mentorinq program for admin~.strative interns through vPZ & su. Ir1 the fall she wilt represent Virginia at a gathering at the white House in Washington, D.C. where she will be recognized by the President of the United States, G~ ROANp~.~ L ti ~ p z ~, ~ 2 a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE f703) 772-2004 C~.o~~x~t~ ~#' ~o~txra~P P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 20, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR ~sILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTOf`' MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Honorable Lawrence J. Koontz, Jr. f7o3) 772-loos Judge, Virginia Supreme Court P. O. Box 687 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Judge Koontz: On behalf of the members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, please accept our congratulations upon your recent appointment as Judge for the Virginia Supreme Court. At our Board Meeting on March 14, 1995, the Board unanimously approved a resolution of congratulations, and that resolution is enclosed. We are very grateful for all the services that you have provided Roanoke County as well as the Roanoke Valley while serving as Judge of the Salem Juvenile and Domestics Relations Court and Virginia Court of Appeals. We wish you the very best in the future as you join the Virginia Supreme Court. If the Board members or I may be of assistance to you in the future, please let me know. Sincerely, _ H. dell/"F>~ y" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors HOM/bjh cc: Board Reading File ®Recyded paper O~ (iOANp,1.~ ~ A z o a? 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 15, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. David Elks Vinton Baptist Church Washington and Maple Streets Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Reverend Elks: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, l would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, March 14, 1995. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grafeful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. With kjr(dest regards, /~~ H. Odell °Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors C~So~tz~#~ ~~ ~o~txtor~e ® Re~yded Paper o~A ANS. F ~ ~ ~ ~ o a s MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 15, 1995 Ms. Barbara Petty 1124 Welch Road Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Ms. Petty: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on April 29, 1995. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1995. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILER FINANCIAL REPORT BYDECEMBER l OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ® ~ C~.o~~z~#~ ~~ ~.~~x~~.~~ o~ ROANp~.~ a h p 2 L7 7 Z J a 1 38 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C~~~xxY# ~a~ ~~xx~~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 8, 1995 Rev. David Elks Vinton Baptist Church Washington and Maple Streets Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Reverend Elks: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of today. Thank you for agreeing to present the invocation at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Board Meeting on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, at 3 p.m. The chairman will call the meeting to order, and then ask you to come to the lectern for the invocation which is followed by the pledge of allegiance. You are welcome to stay for whatever portion of the meeting you desire. As we discussed, the Roanoke County Administration Center has moved from Brambleton Avenue to 5204 Bernard Drive, which was the old "Travelers Building", located directly behind Shoney's off Rt. 419. The Board Meeting room is on the first floor, opposite the elevators, and visitors' parking is in front of the building. I appreciate very much your willingness to be with us on March 14th. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 772- 2005. Sincerely, /.Y~~~. Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper March 1, 1995 MA to J'dge Koontz on his appointment to the State Supr me Court, and I've forgotten whether you or AMG do these kinds of reso's. AMG Mary Hicks gave MA a message that ECH would like a resolution of congrations to Judge Koontz on his appointment to the State Supreme Court. In MA's absence and since you do resolutions of congrats, I am sending this on to you. We do not have a date for this to be presented, etc. but thought you might want to start working on it. Brenda 3-1-95 ECH would like a resolution of congratulation MH 3/ 3/95 1:32 p.m. MA Paula Bittinger, 345-0956, President of Bent Mountain Civic Club and on Citizens Advisory Committee for VDOT Construction 221, said that a number of citizens want to address the Board on March 14th about 221. She has talked at length with LBE and was told to call the Clerk's Office and ask to be put on the agenda. She said they had two concerns about construction and development of corridor and suggested the following title for agenda: Citizens concerned about road construction and development of 221 Corridor. Explained about citizens comments at end of meeting and she said that would be fine. They want to have a big turnout. She will attempt to get speakers to talk about different concerns, not same thing over and over. Brenda cc: ECH ~ ~ l~ ~.: ~ ~ -.~ A Kay 7ohnson called: National Purchasing Month -March 1995 Proclamation for March 14 Board Meeting -use last year's proclamation except change dates. Call her closer to date for who will accept. Mary Allen 1/ 16/95 Budget Calendar FY 1995-96 2/14/95 Finalize vehicle inventory, mid-year budget report -projections. Finalize revenue projections. 2/17/95 Departmental budgets due to Budget Department. 2/17 to 3/3/95 Budget Department review of budgets. 2/28/95 Budget work session-revenues, mid-year expend., vehicle inventory. Public Hearing: General comment on FY1995-96 budget. 3/8 to 3/31/95 Budget Team Meetings/Citizen's Budget Review Committee: Prioritized Addbacks, Capital Improvements, Presentation of Departmental budgets, Discussion of Funding Issues 3/8 Citizen's Committee 3/13 Internal Support and Operations Budget Team (ISOP) 3/15 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services Budget Team 3/17 Public Safety Budget Team 3/20 Internal Support and Operations 3/22 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services ,~ ~ ~~ 3/24 Public Safety ~` 3/29 Citizen's Committee-Isop, Community Services 1 4/5 Citizen's Committee-Public Safety, CourtsJState Agencies ~ 4/19 Citizen's Committee-CIP, Final proposal 3/27-3/31/95 Team budget presentations to County Administrator. 3/28/95 Public Hearing: Tax Rates and Tax Assessment Increase(101 %). Joint budget work session with School Board. 4/1/95 .School Board presents budget to Board of Supervisors 4/4/95 Special Meeting -Budget worksession. Adopt Tax Rates. 4/11/95 Volunteer Rescue and Fire Chiefs budget worksession. 4/25/95 Budget worksession, Public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget and CIP. 5/9/95 Adoption of Budget and CIP. 5/23/95 First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. 6/13/95 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. niaurnxcsaoncrnw..r.~...~c~.toxcwr 1-1 V ~ ~ V D -B 1 `~ ~ 1995 VID R. GEHR ~~ Clpl 7 I ,,~6a f~'4hR TM1~'r~ C®1~M®NWEALTI-I o f VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 ~~ ~ `~:: . ~~ no /a~ -.2 ~ ~ G 9 to ~-~~ 9° February 10, 1995 Boazds of Supervisors of All Counties and the City of Suffolk Council Re: County Primary and Secondary Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program) Fiscal Yeaz 1995-96 Dear Members of the Boazds of Supervisors and Members of the Council: The County Primary and Secondary Road Fund, more commonly known as the "Revenue Sharing Program", allows the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to provide state funds to match local funds for the construction, maintenance, or improvement of primary and secondary highways in your county. This money also may be used for the addition of subdivision streets otherwise eligible under Section 33.1-72.1 Code of Virginia. Such a cooperative program between local governments and VDOT allows for an increased number of road improvements throughout the Commonwealth. In the current fiscal year, 30 counties chose to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program, thereby providing $20 million for additional improvements to the primary and secondary system. The Commonwealth Transportation Board's annual allocation of state funds in this program is limited to $10,000,000 (Code of Virgil, Section 33.1-75.1[C]). If your county wishes to participate in the program for the fiscal yeaz ending June 30, 1996, the Boazd of Supervisors or members of Council must notify VDOT of: * its intent to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program, * the amount of local funds to be provided, not to exceed $500,000, and * the prioritized list of eligible projects with individual estimated project costs. The Resident Engineer for your locality will work with you to identify a list of one or more improvement projects to be undertaken with these funds. Your Resident Engineer will also help you establish estimated project costs. VDOT must receive this information on the attached form by March 31, 1995. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY page 2 This package of information should be sent to: Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Roads Division 1401 E. Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 fig: A sample letter of notification is attached for your reference. In the event that localities throughout the state request a total in excess of the available matching funds, the Commonwealth's participation will be adjusted downwazds on a ~o rata basis to remain within the linuts of the appropriation. The adjustment may require that the lowest priority project or projects be dropped from the prc~~n. You will be notified of the preliminary amount available to your locality in March, 1995; this amount will be subject to approval by the Commonwealth Transportation Boazd in June, 1995. Conversely, should total requests require less than the available funds, those counties which initially requested the $500,000 maximum may apply for a part of the remaining appropriation (Code of Virginia; Section 33.1-75.1 [D]). The allocation of any remaining funds will be decided in June, 1996. ~~: A set of guidelines for administering this program is enclosed to assist you in making these assignments. Thank you for your continued support of this effort. Sincerely, __ (( I L?ZdYz~'--.~~ ;' ~~~ ones S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer Attachments pc: Mr. James W. Atwell District Administrators Resident Engineers 1995 County Primary and Secondary Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program) Code of Virginia, Section 33.1-75.1 Fiscal Yeaz 1995-96 County of Mr. James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Deaz Mr. Givens: The County of ,Virginia, indicates by this letter its official intent to pazticipate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Yeaz 1995-96. The County will provide $ ($500,000.00 maximum) for this program, to be matched on a dollaz-for-dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible items of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program will be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. (Applicable if County requested $500,000 and wants more): Having requested the maximum of $500,000 in state funds, the County further requests that an additional amount of $ be made available in the event that any funds remain unallocated after initial allocations are made. Sincerely, Chairman, Boazd of Supervisors pc: Resident Engineer Attachment: Priority Listing of Projects O e V r ~ r .aa 0 ~ w° O ~ ~ v a~~.. ~•-~ r m m 0 ii r v v ~ ~--~ OO m D q ~ y .... ua a v Y .••. 'O ~ • Y ` . d V -~ V ~ ~~ b~ O YY V m .Y V ~+ Y O O p R O ~+ O p O Y !~ q O Jt O O V Q O 'O q V V M ICY O. Yt -+ r .-. ~~ O 'O P - ~ O ~•.~ r O V V - v O q O V I V 'O w w ~.+ ~ O V v ar a V h h ti V w •-+ O V a Y b ~ .. O O V M r P v e a w •.-. -e ei n s .... v y ___________________________________~__~__~________________~____ a v .: P O Y d ~.~ V ~ a ~ v va e -. e r _. ~ m ~e - e o v o .:. s. r y ----------------'-----'--------------------------------------'--~--- Y+ -. e o .e q O. d .~. ____ __ ______ ______ ____ ________ __________ ______________ ________ _ e v~ a e h V O ~~ y d v ~.. a -. a o •~. V ,.r q V u l~ o v ~ '~ //f 1~ ,~i .L~i~ T _ / I Cr~. ~^-~ February 14, 1995 Mr . C Boars 5204 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear "Fuzzy": O~ ROANO~F' ~, .P L f' ~ Z ~ ~ 2 o a. B iUPERINTENDENT JTY SCHOOLS ~OANOKE. VIRGINIA 24019 .nty Enclosed is a resolution adopted by the Roanoke County School Board on February 9, 1995 regarding the renovations to Cave Spring Junior High School. Inasmuch as Literary funding will be available for this project in November 1995, the school board and administration strongly feel that renovation should begin in the summer of 1995. This, of course, would necessitate advanced funding by the board of supervisors until the Literary funds are received. We are requesting that the board of supervisors include the enclosed resolution on your earliest possible meeting agenda for discussion and action. As always, we are appreciative of the support you and your fellow board members give to the school division. Sincerely, ~~ ~. Frank E. Thomas, Chairman Roanoke County School Board FET:rcw c: Mr. Elmer Hodge k ,i FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADVANCE FUNDING FOR RENOVATIONS TO CAVE SPRING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County is committed to educational excellence which includes providing the most advantageous surroundings which will ensure that students are participating in a quality learning atmosphere, and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School has not been renovated to provide for air conditioning, elevator and other ADA improvements, updated electrical requirements, updated classroom lighting, improved lockers, auditorium upgrade, etc., and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School is the only school in the school system which will not be air conditioned by the year 1997, and WHEREAS, the County School Board has expended $109,372 on architectural and engineering plans which are ready to be implemented as soon as funding is available for construction, and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for construction to be completed over two summers which will require ordering parts and equipment as early as possible, and WHEREAS, the parents and patrons of Cave Spring Junior High School who supported the 1992 bond referendum, which provided the funding to air condition most of the remaining schools on the air conditioning schedule, were under the impression that Cave Spring Junior High would be renovated starting in the spring of 1995; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that due to the availability of the Literary Fund loan for the Cave Spring Junior High School renovation project being moved to November 1995, the County School Board of Roanoke County does hereby request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors advance the school board the amount of $2.5 million or an amount necessary for construction to begin on schedule in 1995 and that such amount be reimbursed when the Literary Fund loan is made available. Adopted on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell, duly seconded and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE :--~ / y ~.c.~.~-G ~ / Clerk C FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADVANCE FUNDING FOR RENOVATIONS TO CAVE SPRING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County is committed to educational excellence which includes providing the most advantageous surroundings which will ensure that students are participating in a quality learning atmosphere, and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School has not been renovated to provide for air conditioning, elevator and other ADA improvements, updated electrical requirements, updated classroom lighting, improved lockers, auditorium upgrade, etc., and WHEREAS, Cave Spring Junior High School is the only school in the school system which will not be air conditioned by the year 1997, and WHEREAS, the County School Board has expended $109,372 on architectural and engineering plans which are ready to be implemented as soon as funding is available for construction, and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for construction to be completed over two summers which will require ordering parts and equipment as early as possible, and WHEREAS, the parents and patrons of Cave Spring Junior High School who supported the 1992 bond referendum, which provided the funding to air condition most of the remaining schools on the air conditioning schedule, were under the impression that Cave Spring Junior High would be renovated starting in the spring of 1995; -- -- -.....,-._.,,-„-, ~~..,~ a„,, r„ +-l~,o aTT.'i~ l al-ii l i tv of i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH ~r~Q9~ /y~ /~,~ 5 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF MARCH AS PURCHASING MONTH t-, ~ ~_ WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has a significant impact on the quality, efficiency, and profitability of businesses and governments; and WHEREAS, purchasing and materials management professionals purchase goods and services, execute, implement, and administer contracts, develop forecasts and procurement strategies, supervise the flow and storage of materials, and work to meet the goals of their organizations; and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management professional has a tremendous influence on economic conditions in the United States, with an accumulative purchasing power running into billions of dollars; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Chapter of the National Association of Purchasing Management-Virginia, Inc. is sponsoring educational events and activities to raise awareness about their profession. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in recognition of the achievements of the purchasing and materials management professional, do hereby proclaim the month of March, 1994, as PURCHASING MONTH, and call its significance to the attention of all citizens. '~ °~ ~ , ~~ ~` ,, FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its special appreciation to the Roanoke County Procurement Department for~ke~ dedication to promoting ethics in public purchasing and saving tax dollars through econom cal buying. ~~S Mayor r. ~ T o _~' '_?_ ~,,~. ,_ V~NGIN~P , ~' i~ _ -~ J ,~ ~ ~~ o Roanoke this Q1ghrh day of hands and the Seal of the City ed and ninety-three: Given under our Ord, nineteen hued to the year of our ement profession is February ~ materials mana8 ability of business WHF.RFAS, ~.chastn8 rofit the role of the p ctency, ~ P nt cant to the quality, efft sib fi ent throughout the United States; and and governor ro essional works f°r and materials managemen ~~ro fit orga-tizations; the purchasinublic, as well as profit and private and p ~ oods and services, the purchastn8 chase of 8 direct ro essiorutl en8a8eS to °r has in addition tv the P ement p f ecuting, impleme/uing, ~ ~ materials mana8 dons such as ~ and procureme-u responsibility f cons ts; developing f°recasts ow ~ storage of and/or monitoring the fi hers and administerin8 ervising relationships with supP strategies; suP workin8 Lion; and materials; and developin8 the or8~~ with other departjj1ents within ro essional has a materials mana8ement to the United States, the purchasing and mic conditions in8 into billions of WHERFIIS, Uence on econo tn8 power rune tremendous t~ularive purcha with c:n accum dollars; and range fi'°n' °ne person rocuT.ement operations purchasing or P ,and WH~~' departme-us to several thousand' Managers and other Purc~stn8 activities and special the National Association of balding ublic on the role WHF1lF-~~ around the world ~e the 8e~ral p associations they educate and inform ~ 8 pYernme~• events to fui' b~iness, i-tdus~'' of purchasin8 within Virginia, or of the Ctty of Roanoke,materials ORE, 1, David A. Bowers, May the p~chasin8 ~d NOW, THF.[tEF the achieve-nents of roclaim March, 1993, as in recognition of reby p mana8ement professional, do he PURCHASING MONTH. Attest: ~~~~' City Cierk ~w Mayor .- ~rociamation ~'~~ o~~zston ~~ - ~-~s THE CITY Oi $AN ANTO IO Ii PR0110 T4q tE MOOT= THE fIRET NATIONAL NFERENCE OF PROFESSION PUlIIC BUTERS ( 1 OF THE NATION INSTITUTE Oi 60TERMENTAt PURCMASINt, :INC.°f OCTOtER 6 - ~. ~8891~~AM0 -: TNIS CONFERENCE YILL~~OFFER PROFESSIONAL POO BUYERS lPP8S1 THE ZEST OPPORTdMITr TO OI PROFSSSIONAIIT IN THE FIEtO OF PROCUREMENTi AMO ;~ _-_ ~a TNIS FIRST CONFERENCE Ylll 0E NELO TO PROTIOE - PPBS AN OPPORTdNITT TO EXCHANGE IOEAS ASO EXPANO PERSONAL AMO -ROFESSIONAI •OALiE AN~1=g ~~ ~. ~ THE PARTICIPANTS: _ TNIS FIRST,. PROfE~ x "` PdttlC BUYERS ' C~~tNCE YIt4. '. PORSdE GOALS OF ~- ~At REM NT a x . ,_~~' ACKNOYLEOSEMEMT 0 : , .,. , tSSIONAL ~ERTI n ~ AMO ,-~,,*' ~EREAS. THESE tUTERS ARE OEtICATEO TO PROIIOTIN~F ,; IM PdttlC PORCNASIMt ANO EATING'°TA~ _ ,, _ TNROYSN ECONOMICAh iNTINt. -; -~,. Ild~i. ?IEREFgtE I. LIIA COCpIELI. MAt-OR of THE C SAM ~NTONIO• IM RECO~,~~I1TION THEREOF. 00 PROCLAIM OCTOtER:.6 • 7. 198.9. T0~8E 'PROfESSIOMAI°PI~LIC 6ltYER$'~ QAYS" t~'~''~ IN SAN ~a .~. t., `, .~~ ,~ ~~~_ ~ ~~ ti ~ ~x ~,. . t, ~`••: ,N~ .:; ANTONIO, TE~''~~` ~-~ ~~~~ ~~ , r~A IN HITLESS ~EI~..~:;,~~ MEREONTO -SET '-NT~~,¢-r AOO 0 TlIE SEAL OE:' M ~ONIO TO OE AF. 666 M ~Y"OF OCTOtEt. 1 ~* `` ~ >' _ _ . uu coac~E« ,~r_'~;. MATOR ~ ~x ~. ,, ~, ~. • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TREASURER'S OFFICE INVESTMENT REPORT MONTH ENDING: FEBRUARY 28, 1995 FOR TYPE: ALL FUNDS FUND BANK TYPE PURCHASE MATURITY PRINCIPAL RATE STATE STATE LGIP 940701 950331 3,011,002.50 STATE STATE LGIP 940701 950331 6,750,831.16 GENERAL FUND WHEAT 1ST BA 941206 950310 376,539.22 6.350 GENERAL FUND PRUDENTIAL TB 941208 950309 985,465.28 5.850 GENERAL FUND SIGNET BA 950117 950303 992,875.00 5.730 GENERAL FUND CRESTAR CP 950118 950324 999,240.69 5.960 GENERAL FUND NATIONS CP 950118 950313 991,000.00 6.060 GENERAL FUND CENTRAL FIDELITY CP 950118 950324 989,527.78 5.860 GENERAL FUND SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON BA 950120 950320 990,412.50 5.910 GFr~Ar, FUND PAINS-WEBBER CP 950120 950331 988,469.44 6.000 GENERAL FUND COMMONWEALTH CP 950124 950324 198,033.33 GENERAL FUND FERGUSON-ANDREWS BA 950125 950313 1,190,741.00 5.960 GENERAL FUND CRESTAR CP 950127 950328 990,133.33 5.980 GENERAL FUND CRAIGIE BA 950130 950327 990,900.00 5.900 GENERAL FUND S & S FID 950131 950331 990,428.99 5.900 GENERAL FUND SIGNET CP 950131 950301 995,247.22 5.920 GENERAL FUND NATIONS BA 950202 950327 991,048.89 6.130 GENERAL FUND SIGNET CP 950202 950331 990,579.17 6.000 GENERAL FUND WHEAT 1ST BA 950215 950411 990,909.72 6.000 GENERAL FUND NATIONS BA 950217 950407 991,901.39 6.000 GENERAL FUND S & S CP 950221 950407 992,625.00 5.940 GENERAL FUND PAINS-WEBBER CP 950222 950410 992,231.94 6.000 GENERAL FUND CRAIGIE BA 950223 950407 993,012.50 5.890 GENERAL FUND CENTRAL FIDELITY RA 950224 950324 1,000,000.00 5.850 GENERAL FUND WHEAT 1ST BA 950228 950418 991,969.44 5.950 GENERAL FUND FIRST VIRGINIA ORA 950228 950301 3,997,000.00 5.800 'II~TAL INVESTMENTS - --------------- 35,362,125.49 CURRENT MONTH INTEREST: INTEREST RECEIVED FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE: FUND BALANCES: General Fund G.O. Bond STATE 25,600,291.83 O.OU 9,761,833.66 35,362,125.49 Page 1 TREASURER'S OFFICE INVESTMENT REP ~t a.. ....-^~•~NTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ,,~ bISTRICT DIRECTOR 31 NOPKINS PLAZA BALTIMOREr ND 21201 Date: OCT 17 1991 RDANDKE VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM INC P 0 BOX 4429 ROANOKEr VA 24015 a~ Dear Applicant3 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY E~ployer Identification Nu~ber! 54-1594325 Contact Person( MS. A. MORRIS Contact Telephone Nu~ber2 f301) 962-9423 Accounting Period Ending; Dece~ber 31 Foundation Status Classiticationt 509(a)(1) Advance Ruling Period Begins. June 24r 991 '--' Advance Ruling Period End~j Deceaber 31r 199 Addendu~ AppliesS Yes Based on intor~ation suppliedr and assuring your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exeaptionr we have deterained you are exe~pt troy Federal incase tax under section SOila) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). Because yo~~ are a newly created organizationr we are not now making a final deter~ination of your foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code. Howeverr we have deter~ined that you can reasonably be expected to be a public- ly supported organization described in sections 509(a)tl) and 110(b)(1)(A)(vi). Accordinglyr you will be treated as a publicly supported organizationr ` and not 85 a private toundationr during an advance ruling period. This advance ruling period begins and ends on the dates shown above. r Nithin 90 da s after the end of ~rour advance rulinp r~ lodr o a subait o us in oraation needed to deteraine whether - ~en s of he a is a su or s wring the advan a It you es ablish that you ave been a publicly supported organizationr you will ke classified as a section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organization as long as you con-~ tinue to Beet the require~ents of the applicable support test. It_ vnu do not Beet he t re uire~ents Burin th van ill be classif as a private oundation for uture aeriods. Alsor it you are classified as a private toundationr you will be treated-"as a private foundation , from the date of your inception for purposes of sections 507(d) and 4940. Grap!ors-~~~ ~~~tribut private foundation until 90 It you sub~i a requ re butors gay continue to rely sakes a final deteraination da rel on the detereination that `•; ~~ 4 days after the en o our advance ru in eriod in or~a ion within the 90 daysr grantors and contri- on the advance deter~ination until the Service of your foundation status. Letter 1045(DO/CG) ~S l