Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/28/1995 - RegularO~ POAN ~. F a ti~ v _. az ~~"~~~ ~~ 1838 ~II~Y~CU'~.E ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MARCH 28, 1995 /ff.IRT 6 17R' N.fQ' RIDi~' Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. .Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and t1~e fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored 6y Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Irnocation: H. Odell "Fuzzy Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE i nec+c!ed Pager C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring April, 1995, as Child Abuse Prevention Month. EGK MOTION TO APPROVE URC ACCEPTED BY BETTY MCCRARY, DIR. SOCIAL SERVICES AND GARY THOMPSON, SOCIAL SERVICES DEPT. D. BRIEFINGS - NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Claim by Joseph J. Steffen v. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in Connection with the Representation of Ms. Katherine Nunn. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) A-32895-1 HCN MOTION TO DENY CLAIM URC 2. Resolution of Support and Opposition to Items to be Considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) R-32895-2 BI{T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AMENDED WITH ADDITION OF: ITEM E (2) OPPOSING THE GOVERNOR'S RETURN OF LOTTERY PROCEEDS TO LOCALITIES, AND ITEM F OPPOSING A STATE GAMING COMMISSION ENFORCING BINGO AND RAFFLE REGULATIONS. PMM TO REVISE RESO AND BRING BACK TO BOARD FOR RATIFICATION. LBE AMENDED BI;T'S MOTION TO ELIMINATE ITEM E REGARDING GOVERNOR'S RETURN OF LOTTERY PROCEEDS TO LOCALITIES. AYES-LBE 2 NAYS-BI{T,EGK,HCN ABSTAIN-FM BIT ORIGINAL MOTION WITH AMENDMENTS: AYES-BI.~T,EGK,HCN NAYS-LBE ABSTAIN-FM LATER: PMM REVISED RESO WITH BIT AMENDMENTS. BI;T MOVED TO ADOPT AYES-BI.~T,EGK,HCN NAYS-LBE ABSTAIN-FM URC 3. Request for Consideration of Projects from 1995-96 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-32895-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE $480,000 FUNDING AND PROTECTS URC F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS HCN REQUESTED WORK SESSION WITH VDOT ON ROUTE ALTERNATIVES FOR RT. 221 IMPROVEMENTS. ECH SUGGESTED MID APRIL. G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to Rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and 3 C-1 Conditional to C-1 to House Administrative Offices and Church Services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 2. Ordinance to Rezone 0.49 Acre from C-1 Conditional to C- 1 to Construct a Learning Center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.95 Acres from C-1 and C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Construct a Supermarket and Drug Store, Located at - 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR 4/25/95 - URC I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority EGK NOMINATED CAROLE BRACKMAN TO THE FOUR YEAR UNEXPIRED TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND 4 WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII~L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-32895-4 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO i~RC 1. Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to the Jail Medical Account. R-32895-4.a 2. Request for Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-32895-4.6 3. Request for Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-32895-4.c 4. Donation of Waterline Easement and a 15-foot Sanitary Sewer Easement on a 1.927 Acre Parcel from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation to the Board of Supervisors. A-32895-4.d 5. Appropriation of Litter Control Grant to Clean Valley Council. A-32895-4.e 6. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kings Chase, Section 2. A-32895-4.f 7. Request from the School Board requesting Appropriations to the School Grant Fund as follows: A-32895-4.g a. $800 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts for Multicultural Performance by J. Plunky Branch. b. $1,500 From the Virginia Commission of the Arts for Performances by Virginia Opera. s c. $4,858 in the Artists-in-Education Residency Program. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit from North Cross School A-32895-4.h M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: (1) Announced there would be a community meeting on the visioning process on Saturday, April 1 at Cave Spring High School. (3) Received copy of citizen survey which shows that most citizens are satisfied with Roanoke County; (3) Advised- that he requested a quick land use study on Route 221, either by staff or, if they are too busy, by a consultant. ECH advised that based on VDOT's plan, a study could be conducted after the visioning process is complete. 3) Wrote memo regarding complaint from resident that base utility charges were too high even if water and sewer were not used. ECH advised that staff has discussed and met with Wheat First Securities who are looking at rate structure to see if base rates could be reduced. (4) Has received a complaint about trash on road from Vinton to Roanoke City from Vinton resident who saw meeting on TV. Recommended explaining things more fully now that meetings are filmed. (5) Noted article in newspaper about bank robber who was apprehended in Roanoke City through efforts of Roanoke County volunteer firefighter, Christopher DeMars. Supervisor Nickens: Asked for publicity on government access channel and other methods on the importance of making sure street numbers can be seen by emergency vehicles. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND C011~IlViUlvICATIONS NONE O. REPORTS BLOT MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS -UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 5. Bond Project Status Report 5 1~T[NUTE RECESS AT 3:55 P.M. Q. WORK SESSION AT 4:05 1. Budget Work Session DISCUSSION ON MAINTENANCE PROGRAM, CIP PROTECT REVIEW, PROPOSED CONTRIBUTIONS TO VARIOUS AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS, AND SALARY AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. LBE ASKED FOR COPY OF LETTERS FROM ORGANIZATIONS REQUESTING CONTRIBUTIONS. LBE SUGGESTED DROPPING OUT OF VML - BI;T AND FM DID NOT AGREE HCN AND LBE ASKED FOR WORK SESSION WITH FIRE AND RESCUE AD HOC COI~'IMIITEE. ECH WILL TRY TO SET UP IN APRIL. ECH WILL PRESENT PRIORITIZED CIP AT LATER WORK SESSION BLJ ASKED FOR WORK SESSION ON HEALTH CARE R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A NONE S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION NONE EVENING SESSION ATTORNEY FOR ITEM V-4 ASKED THAT THIS REQUEST BE CONTIIVUED TO APRIL 25 LBE MOTION TO CONTINUE URC FM INTRODUCED BOY SCOUT TROOP 236 AND THEIR SCOUT MASTERS T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Issuance of General Estimated Amount of Capital Projects for Director of Finance) Adoption of Resolution on the Obligation School Bonds in the $10,100,000 to Finance Certain School Purposes. (Diane Hyatt, R-32895-5 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AYES-EGK, FM NAYS-LBE PASS-BI.~~, HCN (IATER CHANGED TO AYES 5 PEOPLE SPOKE 2. Public Hearing to Elicit Comment on the Following: (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. To set the real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. 3 PEOPLE SPOKE b. To set the personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and to set the machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. 0 PEOPLE SPOKE 3. Public Hearing on the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Increase as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) s PEOPLE SPOKE U. PUBLIC ~[EARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending the 1994-95 Budget for the Purpose of Appropriating Funds for the Clean-up of Dixie Caverns. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 4/11/95 URC V. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Rezone ltvo Parcels of Land Totaling 7.93 Acres from EP to AG-3, Located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-32895-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD REZONING ONLY PARCEL 1 X2.0 ACRES, WITH PARCEL 2 CONTINUED TO 4/25/95 URC 1 PERSON SPOKE Z. An Ordinance to Rezone 22.21 Acres from I-2 to AR to Allow Single Family Dwellings, Located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-32895-7 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 0 PEOPLE SPOKE 3. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.864 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Allow General Retail Sales, Located at 1806 and 9 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-32895-8 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 0 PEOPLE SPOKE 4. An Ordinance to Rezone 4.068 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Allow Single Family Attached and Detached Dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) CONTINUED TO 4/25/95 AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER AND UNANIMOUS RECORDED VOTE OF BOARD MEMBERS. 5. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Water and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions Upon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) 0-32895-9 BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 0 PEOPLE SPOKE PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: An Ordinance Authorizing a Saecial Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Major) 400 Feet Northwest of the Intersection of Ambassador Drive and Errvov Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. Uoon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. io An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Major) 300 Feet Southeast of the Terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS 1. BRUCE FRYKMAN, 2629 BOBWHITE DRIVE, SPOKE CONCERNING NOISE FROM SUCTION PUMPS AND BLOWER MOTORS ON TOP OF CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION'S ROOF. HE PRESENTED PETITION FROM OTHER PENN FOREST RESIDENTS COMPLAINING OF NOISE. ECH ADVISED THAT TWG HAD BEEN WORKING WITH CORRUGATED CONTAINER ON THE PROBLEM. ECH WILL SET UP MEETING WITH RESIDENTS AND REPORT BACK AT 4/11/95 MEETING. 2. SEVERAL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS COMPLAINED ABOUT NOT BEING PAID FOR WORK THEY DID AT EXPLORE PARK AND ASKED WHERE TO GET HELP. HCN RECOMMENDED MEETING WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY. X. ADJOLJIEtNMENT TO MARCH 29, 1995 AT 12:00 NOON AT THE VINTON WAR MEMORIAL FORA TOINT MEETING WITH THE VINTON TOWN COUNCIL. FM ADTOURNED MEETING AT 9:23 P.M. ii O~ pOAN ,~~ ti Z ~, ~ 2 a~ 1 38 C~.~~x~#~ .a~ ~a~tx~~.~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 28, 1995 ,~,ff~~,~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting.. Regular :meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Irnocation: The Reverend John Hartwig Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i ® Recycled Paper 1. Proclamation Declaring April, 1995, as Child Abuse Prevention Month. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Claim by Joseph J. Steffen v. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in Connection with the Representation of Ms. Katherine Nunn. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 2. Resolution of Support and Opposition to Items to be Considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Request for Consideration of Projects from 1995-96 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to Rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to House Administrative Offices and Church Services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 2. Ordinance to Rezone 0.49 Acre from C-1 Conditional to C- 1 to Construct a Learning Center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.95 Acres from C-1 s and C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Construct a Supermarket and Drug Store, Located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to the Jail Medical Account. 2. Request for Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request for Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Donation of Waterline Easement and a 15-foot Sanitary Sewer Easement on a 1.927 Acre Parcel from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation to the Board of Supervisors. 5. Appropriation of Litter Control Grant to Clean Valley Council. 3 6. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kings Chase, Section 2. 7. Request from the School Board requesting Appropriations to the School Grant Fund as follows: a. $800 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts for Multicultural Performance by J. Plunky Branch. b. $1,500 From the Virginia Commission of the Arts for Performances by Virginia Opera. c. $4,858 in the Artists-in-Education Residency Program. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit from North Cross School M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COIbIlVIU1vICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 5. Bond Project Status Report P. RECESS FOR MEDIA QUESTIONS Q. WORK SESSION 4 1. Budget Work Session R. S. T. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution on the Issuance of General Obligation School Bonds in the Estimated Amount of $10,100,000 to Finance Certain Capital Projects for School Purposes. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 2. Public Hearing to Elicit Comment on the Following: (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. To set the real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. b. To set the personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and to set the machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. U. 3. Public Hearing on the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Increase as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending the 1994-95 Budget for the Purpose of Appropriating Funds for the Clean-up of Dixie Caverns. s (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) V. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. An Ordinance to Rezone 1i~vo Parcels of Land Totaling 7.93 Acres from EP to AG-3, Located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. An Ordinance to Rezone 22.21 Acres from I-2 to AR to Allow Single Family Dwellings, Located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.864 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Allow General Retail Sales, Located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of ~erett J. Miles, Sr. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. An Ordinance to Rezone 4.068 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Allow Single Family Attached and Detached Dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Water and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions Upon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE 6 DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Majorl 400 Feet Northwest of the Intersection of Ambassador Drive and Envoy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Major) 300 Feet Southeast of the Terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1vRVIUNICATIONS X. ADJOURNMENT TO MARCH 29, 1995 AT 12:00 NOON AT THE VINTON WAR MEMORIAL FORA TOINT MEETING WITH THE VINTON TOWN COUNCIL. c-J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF APRIL, 1995 AS CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH WHEREAS, the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect have reached alarming proportions in the United States, where 14,101 cases of child abuse and neglect were substantiated in Virginia during fiscal year 1993-94, and 36 cases were reported in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia and Roanoke County are committed to supporting families through programs that will prevent child abuse and neglect; and WHEREAS, there are numerous dedicated individuals and organizations in Roanoke County who work daily to break the cycle of child abuse and neglect and to find families the assistance that they need; and WHEREAS, every child has a right to live rather than to exist, to be a person rather than a possession and to be equal with every other human being, regardless of age; and WHEREAS, all children deserve loving hugs, warm homes, and tender care from parents and adults who make them feel safe and happy and loved. NOW, THEREFORE, We, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the month of April, 1995, as CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH in Roanoke County, Virginia, and call upon our citizens to observe the month with appropriate programs and activities and to wear a BLUE RIBBON to show that it should not hurt to be a child. ,~ ACTION # DENIAL A-32895-1 ITEM NUMBER C - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF BUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Claim of Joseph J. Steffen, Jr., Esq. against the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke for $824.25 for attorneys fees in connection with the representation of Ms. Katherine Nunn for Supplemental Security Income (S.S.I.) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~tN /~ D'~~ BACKGROUND' The Supplemental Security Income or S.S.I. program is one of a number of benefit programs administered by the Social Security Administration of the U.S. government. When an applicant for these benefits, just as for disability benefits, is represented by an attorney, Social Security must approve the amount of any attorney's fee which can be collected for representation of the applicant. Normally, any fee is limited to a 25% contingency fee. In some cases, the attorney's fee approved is deducted from any back- payments due to the applicant and in other cases, the attorney may be paid directly by the applicant. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph J. Steffen, Jr., an attorney in Blacksburg, represented Ms. Katherine M. Nunn, a resident of Roanoke County, in connection with her application for both disability benefits and S.S.I. benefits from Social Security. In connection with her application for S.S.I., Ms. Nunn applied for General Relief (G.R.) benefits from Roanoke County Department of Social Services (R.C.D.S.S.) and began to receive G.R. payments beginning in August of 1991. As part of her application for G.R. with R.C.D.S.S., Ms. Nunn signed an agreement instructing Social Security to forward her initial payment of S.S.I. benefits to R.C.D.S.S. and permitting this department to deduct the amount of G.R. paid to Ms. Nunn until her S.S.I. benefits began. [See Attachment "A".] When Social Security finally approved Ms. Nunn's S.S.I. application in July, 1993, they forwarded a check in the sum of $5,051.26 to R.C.D.S.S. After deducting the sum of $3,297.00 paid to Ms. Nunn in G.R. through July, 1993, the balance of $1,754.26 ~_ i was forwarded to Ms. Nunn. [See Attachment "B".] Subsequently, the Social Security Administrative Law Judge assigned to this case approved a total fee to Mr. Steffen of $2,593.82. This authorization contained the notation that the check being sent to Mr. Steffen by Social Security was for less than this awarded fee and instructing him that "you will have to look to the claimant for any balance due." [See Attachment "C".] R.C.D.S.S. had no contract with Mr. Steffen to represent Ms. Nunn in connection with her application for S.S.I. benefits. In 1992, the General Assembly adopted § 63.1-89.1 which established an advocacy project to assist recipients of G.R. in obtaining S.S.I. benefits. This law makes it optional with each local department of social services as to whether they will refer potential S.S.I. claimants to attorney's working with this project. [See Attachment "D".] R.C.D.S.S. has never participated in this project and did not refer Ms. Nunn to Mr. Steffen for representation in connection with her S.S.I. benefit application. It is the position of R.C.D.S.S. that neither the department nor Roanoke County has any legal liability to Mr. Steffen in connection with his representation of Ms. Nunn in this matter. Prior to responding to this claim, the department received confirmation from the state as to its responsibility in this matter. [See Attachments "E" & "F".] Mr. Steffen has the option to collect the balance of his fee directly from Ms. Nunn. FISCAL IMPACT' Mr. Steffen is requesting a payment of $824.25 which would have to be paid from County funds. There is no possibility of obtaining any reimbursement from either the Social Security Administration or the Virginia Department of Social Services for these fees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this claim be denied. Respectfully submitted, Jo eph B. benshain S for A sistant County Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens to deny Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney COMr3ONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Department of Social Ser ces - Attachment A A[iTNf)RT7.ATTnN FnR RF.T.FA~F f1F ~4T C.F[Ff:K E-I To: C-l~-y/County to which initial Social Security Administration S payment will be made _ (Branch/District Address) ~ Eli ibility Worker SSI A plicant~s Name SS ~ ~' Case Number t, J Address ;,~,..,~ ;:~'; ~_~, ,Irk.. '' ~ `, ~.I ~,,,; ;. I, the undersigned, authorize the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. DHHS) to :.send my initial payment of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits to the i'ce' ~c•,~_. {'; County/GLi-~~y Department of Social Services. I further authorize the local department to deduct from my initial payment an amount equal to the benefits I receive from the Interim Assistance Component of the General Relief Program (there are no federal funds in these benefits) during the period beginning with the day of the month I am found eligible for an SSI payment and ending with the month my SSI payments begin. I understand that after making the above deductions from my initial payment, the local department will pay to me the balance, if any, no later than 10 working days from the date the department receives my initial payment from the Secretary of the U.S. DHHS. I further understand that I Dave the right to a fair hearing before the Virginia Department of Social Services if I feel that the amount deducted from my initial payment of SSI benefits is more than the amount of Interim Assistance benefits paid to or on behalf of me by the local department. I further understand that this authorization is effective for one year from the date I sign it and that it will cease to have effect (1) at the end of one year unless I file for SSI within the year or (2) at the occurrence of one of the following events: o The Secretary of the U.S. DHHS makes an initial payment on my SSI claim; o Tlie Secretary of the U.S. DHHS makes a final determination on my claim and no timely request for review is filed by me; or o The local department and I agree to terminate the authorization. I further understand that signing this form means: o I want to file for SSI payments. o I must file for SSI with a social security office and that Social Security will decide if I am eligible for SSI. o My eligibility for SSI can begin as early as the date I sign this form only if I file for SSI within 60 days of the date I sign this form. _i ~ f ~" Applicant's Signature Date .- r. Eligibility ~]orker's Signature Date ` 032-03-038/3 FIN~INCE COMMONWEAI•TH OF VIRGINIA Attachment B E-p DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Case Number County/City NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF SSI CHECK 770-043101-00-5 ROANOKE COUNTY RECIPIENT PERIOD COVERED BY SSI CHECK Name: From To KATHERINE NUNN 8-91 7-93 SSN: Amount of SSI Check $ 231-76-1715 5,051.26 Address: Amount of Interim Assistance Reimbursed $~-~ 3 297 00 5766 DRY HOLLOW ROAD , . City, State, Zip Amount of SSI Owed $ SALEM VA 24153 To You 1,754.26 ~~~ al,t..viVJA1Vl,P. wliri lrir. AUlriVK1ZA1lUN YUU 51GNEll, YUUR INiTiAL PAYMENT OF SSI WAS SENT TO THIS DEPARTMENT; AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE BENEFITS YOU RECEIVED FROM THE INTERIM ASSISTANCE COMPONENT OF THE GENERAL RELIEF PROGRAM WAS DEDUCTED; AND ANY REMAINDER OF THE INITIAL PAYMENT IS BEING PAID TO YOU. THE MONTHS FOR WHICH YOU RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AND THE AMOUNTS OF ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FOLLOW: Month Year Amount Month Year Amount Month Year Amount 9 91 157.00 7 92 157.00 10 91 157.00 g g2 157.00 11 91 157.00 9 92 157.00 12 91 157.98 10 92 157.00 1 92 157.00 2 93 314.00 2 92 157.00 3 93 157.00 3 92 157.00 4 93 157.00 4 92 157.89 5 93 157.00 5 92 157.00 6 93 157.00 6 92 157.00 7 93 157.00 Beginning next month your. SSI check will be sent directly to you. If you have any questions about the information on this notice, contact your eligibility worker. If you believe that your SSI check was not used in accordance with your signed authorization you may ask for a conference with your worker or ask for a fair hearing by the Virginia Department of~Social Services. Eligibility Worker Telephone Number Date of Mailing B. YEBBER 387-6036 7-19-93 Mailing Address ROAIvTOKE`COUNTY DSS, PO BOX 1127, SALEM VA 24153 032-03-239/2 CASE RECORD ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION 32895-2 OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION TO CERTAIN ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE 1995 VETO SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board wishes to express its interest in matters to be considered at the Veto Session of the 1995 General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative matters are submitted to the 1995 General Assembly for its favorable consideration during the Veto Session. I A. Law Enforcement. The County urges the General Assembly to maintain the restoration of funding for the H.B. 599 Program (State aid to localities with police departments). During its 1995 session, the General Assembly restored $10 Million of HB 599 funding. Failure to preserve this funding will result in a serious loss for Roanoke County. B. Fringe Benefits for Constitutional Officers. The General Assembly restored funding for constitutional officers' salary fringe benefits (SB 560, which was passed and has been signed by the Governor, increased sheriffs' fees to offset the fringe benefit costs). Preservation of this funding is a top priority for Roanoke County in the 1995 session of the General Assembly. Failure to support this funding will result in a loss of $317,241 for Roanoke County. C. Education. Realizing that public education is the 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION TO CERTAIN ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE 1995 VETO SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~-yK~ ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On March 14, 1995, the County Attorney provided the Board of Supervisors with a report on the status of certain legislative issues adopted by the 1995 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. It has been suggested that the Board adopt a resolution advising the Governor and the members of the Roanoke Valley legislative delegation of its position on several key legislative issues that may be considered during the April 5, 1995 Veto Session. The attached resolution supports and opposes several key legislative issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 1 v ~.._ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION TO CERTAIN ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE 1995 VETO SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board wishes to express its interest in matters to be considered at the Veto Session of the 1995 General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative matters are submitted to the 1995 General Assembly for its favorable consideration during the Veto Session. I A. Law Enforcement. The County urges the General Assembly to maintain the restoration of funding for the H.B. 599 Program (State aid to localities with police departments). During its 1995 session, the General Assembly restored $10 Million of HB 599 funding. Failure to preserve this funding will result in a serious loss for Roanoke County. B. Fringe Benefits for Constitutional Officers. The General Assembly restored funding for constitutional officers' salary fringe benefits (SB 560, which was passed and has been signed by the Governor, increased sheriffs' fees to offset the fringe benefit costs). Preservation of this funding is a top priority for Roanoke County in the 1995 session of the General Assembly. Failure to support this funding will result in a loss of $317,241 for Roanoke County. C. Education. Realizing that public education is the 3 '~~ 1 A-32895-3 ACTION ~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Projects for 1995-96 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:- /A BACKGROUND The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides $10,000,000 for the matching program and limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or fewer than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff has worked with VDOT to prepare a priority list of proposed projects to be constructed with revenue sharing funds (Enclosure 1). The list of 56 projects represents approximately one million dollars of construction cost. If additional revenue sharing funds become available during fiscal year 1995-96, staff will submit an additional list of projects to the Board for approval. If our share is reduced, staff will either reduce the scope of work on some projects or eliminate projects based upon their priority, costs, and location. This year, staff is placing Camney Lane, a Rural Addition project, on our project list. The reason is because VDOT has informed County staff that our Rural Addition account is low. 3 '-~,,. ~ E-3 Staff knowing there are additional rural addition projects to be submitted this year recommends placing Camney Lane on the Revenue Sharing List. This allows~Roanoke County to better utilize the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the priority list in order that we may notify the Virginia Department of Transportation of our intentions to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative Number 1: Approve the project list and defer appropriation of the funds ($480,000) at this time. The remaining $20,000 funds will be allocated from the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. Alternative Number 2: Do not include $20,000 contribution for Camney Lane and place additional projects on project list and defer appropriation of the funds ($500,000) at this time. Alternative Number 3: Decline to participate in revenue sharing for Fiscal Year 1995-96. STAFF RECONIIKENDATION Staff recommends Alternative Number 1. Approve the project list and defer appropriation of the funds ($480,000) at this time. The remaining $20,000 funds will be allocated from the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, irec or Elmer C. Ho ge of Engineering & In nections County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Kohinke to approve 5480 000 funding and projects VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation 4 -J~ ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 772-2080 M E M O R AND U M TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: Arnold Covey, Director Engineering & Inspections DATE: March 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Approval of Projects For VDOT's Revenue Sharing Program - 1995 through 1996 Please review the attached information prior to the Board meeting on March 28, 1995. If you have any questions concerning the Revenue Sharing Program prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate to call. ae Attachment TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA 1. REVENUE SHARING BOARD REPORT 2. REVENUE SHARING LETTER 3. SUMMARY OF REVENUE SHARING PLAN AND PROJECTS 4. REVENUE SHARING MAPS 5. VDOT'S REVENUE SHARING PLAN PAGE 3-4 5 6 ENCLOSURE 1 ENCLOSURE 2 2 ~~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Projects for 1995-96 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program COUNTY ADMINISTR,ATOR'S COMMENTS:-~/^~ 4~^~ orate Q~~~t,~~ ~~~ The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides $10,000,000 for the matching program and limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or fewer than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff has worked with VDOT to prepare a priority list of proposed projects to be constructed with revenue sharing funds (Enclosure 1). The list of 56 projects represents approximately one million dollars of construction cost. If additional revenue sharing funds become available during fiscal year 1995-96, staff will submit an additional list of projects to the Board for approval. If our share is reduced, staff will either reduce the scope of work on some projects or eliminate projects based upon their priority, costs, and location. This year, staff is placing Camney Lane, a Rural Addition ' project, on our project list. The reason is because VDOT has informed County staff that our Rural Addition account is low. 3 [1 ' '~_ 3 ' Staff knowing there are additional rural addition projects to be submitted this year recommends placing Camney Lane on the Revenue Sharing List. This allows Roanoke County to better utilize the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the ' priority list in order that we may notify the Virginia Department of Transportation of our intentions to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program. ' ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative Number 1: Approve the project list and defer ' appropriation of the funds ($480,000) at this time. The remaining $20,000 funds will be allocated from the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. Alternative Number 2: Do not include $20,000 contribution for Camney Lane and place additional projects on project list and defer appropriation of the funds ($500,000) at this time. Alternative Number 3: Decline to participate in revenue ' sharing for Fiscal Year 1995-96. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative Number 1. Approve the project list and defer appropriation of the funds ($480,000) at this time. The remaining $20,000 funds will be allocated from ' the $20,000 contribution from the citizens of Camney Lane. ' ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ' Arnold Covey, irec or Elmer C. Ho ge of Engineering & In pections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ' ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson ' Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 4 1 County Primary and Secondary Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program) Code of Virginia, Section 33.1-75.1 Fiscal Year 1995-96 County of Roanoke March 29, 1995 Mr. James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Givens: The County of Roanoke, Virginia, indicates by this letter its official intent to participate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The County will provide $500,000 for this program, to be matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia. The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible item(s) of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program may be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. Having requested the maximum amount of State funds, the County further requests the opportunity to match additional funds if they are made available. Sincerely, Chairman, Board of Supervisors pc: Resident Engineer Attachments: Priority Listing of Projects 5 1 ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY'S REVENUE SHARING PLAN FOR FY 1995 THRU 1996 The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvements to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides 10 million for the matching program and limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or less than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. Last year Roanoke County's matched funds were reduced approximately $80,000 ($160,000 total). All the projects reduced or cut from last year's list are a high priority this year or have been addressed with maintenance funds. Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation staff have been continuously reviewing and evaluating streets and drainage requests throughout the year. In addition to reviewing citizens inquiries, staff contacted several Roanoke County Departments (Economic Development and Utility Department) and VDOT's area superintendents. Overall approximately 100 to 150 requests were reviewed. The requests varied from simple maintenance items to million dollar construction projects. Revenue Sharing projects are normally smaller in scope and completed within 1 year. Typical projects are plant mix overlays, drainage improvements and spot (horizontal or vertical ' curve) improvements to correct sight distance problems. VDOT and County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request received for inclusion in the Revenue Sharing Plan. In deciding which projects would be included, the following criteria was used; traffic counts, pavement width (18' or greater for plant mix) existing and future development, overall pavement conditions (alligator cracking, depressions and utility cuts), drainage, vehicular safety and the economic benefits. ' Once the projects are selected, they are placed in the attached prioritized order. n 6 ~~ ' ROADS CONSIDERED BUT NOT ON THIS YEAR'S LIST LANGE LANE: Requested last year to be plant mixed and staff ' re-visited the site. The inspection revealed that Lange Lane had been re-surfaced with maintenance funds. POOR MOUNTAIN ROAD: Staff will continue to negotiate with d l e property owners to see if additional work can be schedu on next year's Revenue Sharing list. ' BOTTOM CREEK LANE AND BOTTOM CREEK ROAD: Plant mix was requested. These roads are very winding and narrow in places. Before considering plant mixing, the road should be ' widened and straightened. RED LANE EXTENSION: A request was received last year to ' install a turnaround on this road but because of higher priorities staff was not able to inquire about the needed ROW. ' KEFFER ROAD: A request was received last year to improve the vertical sight distance and VDOT did what work they could in the existing ROW but additional ROW is still needed ' to correct the situation. MEACHAM ROAD, KELLEY STREET AND TWINE HOLLOW ROAD: A ' request for plant mix was received last year. The site inspection this year revealed that the roads were still in satisfactory condition. Staff will monitor Twine Hollow Road until all of the heavy construction at Dixie Caverns is completed. Meacham Road and Kelley Street are so narrow at places, right-of-way and minor widening will have to occur ' prior to plant mixing these roads. BONSACK ROAD STONEY RIDGE DRIVE and MOCKINGBIRD LANE: Plant mix was requested last year and this year's inspections showed some deterioration beginning to show. If VDOT does ' not surface treat or slurry seal, we will evaluate next year. CREEKWOOD DRIVE, BEAVER BROOK ROAD, PUCKETT CIRCLE, CROWN CIRCLE, FERNLAWN ROAD, BENT TREE CIRCLE, SILVER LEAF DRIVE, TEXAS HOLLOW ROAD AND ALLEGHANY DRIVE: Plant mix was ' requested last year but an inspection revealed the pavement i f ng. ac was in good condition and did not warrant resur u u 1 GIVENS-TYLER ROAD: A request was received last year to improve sight distance at the intersection of Alleghany Drive but because of other priorities, staff has been unable to obtain needed right-of-way. The ditching in the area was completed by VDOT this past year. ELLEN DRIVE, FORT AVENUE, HAWLEY DRIVE, MOUNTVIEW DRIVE, GENE STREET, ANDREW AVENUE, AND GIVENS AVENUE: Staff also considered paving, but the drainage and minor widening needs to be addressed first. Staff has included Ellen Drive on this year's drainage maintenance list. DUTCH OVEN ROAD, CATAWBA CREEK ROAD, WEST RIVER ROAD, AND NEWPORT ROAD: Catawba Creek Road and Newport Road were inspected and found that re-surfacing was not needed at this time. Dutch Oven Road is beginning to show signs of deterioration and probably will need re-surfacing next year. West River Road needs some drainage ditch work prior to re- surf ac ing . GRANDIN ROAD EXTENSION: In need of re-surfacing; however, until the cause (gas line) is corrected, there is no need to schedule this work. MEADOW CREEK DRIVE, ORCHARD VALLEY CIRCLE, AND MEADOW VALLEY CIRCLE: Also looked at, but determined not to need re- surfacing at this .time. County staff will review again next year. FONTAINE DRIVE AND FARMINGTON DRIVE: An inspection was conducted again this year and determined that these roads did not need re-surfacing. CASTLE ROCK ROAD: Drainage improvements. VDOT and County staff still have not agreed upon a solution. We will keep this request on file and review again next year for funding. EANES ROAD: Considered for plant mixing but the pavement width was less than the minimum required by VDOT. ROSECREST ROAD: Request for re-surfacing, pavement is beginning to break-up in a few locations, will evaluate again next year. WALROND DRIVE: We received a request from a developer to improve drainage and install sidewalks, but under VDOT's Revenue Sharing Guidelines this would constitute a site specific improvement and does not qualify for Revenue Sharing. 8 1 HOLLINS ROAD: The left turn lane at Hanover Direct is site specific and does not qualify for Revenue Sharing funds. VIEWPOINT AVENUE, County received a the existing road to be in good cony this time. There will review these PLEASANT RUN DRIVE, AND SCENERY DRIVE: The petition from the homeowners to evaluate surface. The existing pavement appeared 3ition and does not need re-surfacing at are some minor drainage problems and staff roads again next year. TWO FORD ROAD: Staff reviewed last year for inclusion in the Six Year Plan, but it was not considered a high priority. We also reviewed the road for plant mix this year; however, the existing pavement width is inadequate. Staff will consider for spot improvements next year. OLD MILL ROAD, WHISTLER for plant mix; however, are marginal (less than shape. There are signs but VDOT should be able maintenance program. DRIVE, AND CREEK CIRCLE: Inspected the existing widths of these roads 18') and are in relatively good of pavement deterioration in spots, to handle these areas through the CROSSTIMBER TRAILS, ACORN TRAIL, AND LONGLEAF DRIVE: Reviewed for plant mix but the existing road surface was determined to be adequate. RAM DRIVE: An inspection revealed existing pavement too narrow for plant mix. WADE ROAD: A site visit revealed that the road was in adequate condition. There were a couple of places where winter break-up had occurred and maintenance funds should correct. The existing width of the road would be borderline for an asphalt overlay. GALLOWAY CIRCLE: A turnaround was requested but staff did not have time to obtain the ROW. GAYLORD ROAD: An inspection revealed the pavement was beginning to break up. In fact, several other roads in ' surrounding areas need to be looked at for future Revenue Sharing projects. we will review this area again next year. SPRING GROVE DRIVE, JONQUIL CIRCLE, CROCUS CIRCLE, TULIP_ ' LANE, SUNFLOWER DRIVE, AND IVY LANE: Recent inspection revealed that VDOT had recently slurry sealed these roads. ' HAMPDEN HILLS SUBDIVISION: Staff reviewed and found most of the roads were in good shape. ~ s i This concludes our brief update of the Revenue Sharing Program. Again, if you have any questions or require additional ' information prior to the Board Meeting, please do not hesitate to contact VDOT or our staff. Staff received a request to review the roads in the Falling ' Creek subdivision recently. An inspection revealed the roads were beginning to deteriorate but staff had already completed this year's list. We will forward the request to VDOT and review ' again next year. r 7 7 10 ROANOKE COUNTY SIX YEAR SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 1995-1996 REVENUE SHARING MAPS ENCLOSURE 1 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (SALEM DISTRICT) ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ~9 X22 ~~ a,~ ti,PQ 9Q' t 'S'ld~~y ~~ ~4~Q ~o ~ `F ci~P.i ~1l P~ '~~ ~ W W Q J U ~ 6 ti ~ ~~RY~R ~Z DR ~ ) c°j rf~ jT,s, F q r .p C' d ,Py c0\T~ ~~P 9 J ~y F~ ~l<< G,~,T~ ~ ~.oj<<t \~j` ~~ ~q~FJ 4 ~,~ BRADSHAW ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 12 1 il•iL L1Y • iLJ •\ ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 14 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING SUGAR LOAF MOUNTAIN PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY HOARD OF SUPERVISORS (RIGHT-OF-IIAY AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO VDOT) 16 ^ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANQr;~F COU1~"r,;~ DESIGNATION ~F FU~aDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING k" DR a WINESAP DR = 1084 o ~m GO DEN CR ~ JONATHAN LA C 12 1085 R~MAgC kFR LABRADDRE DR ._._1227 HARVEST RIDGE ,fir ` 108- 6 ~.4,n ~ ~ TREE 1085 Apps`: TREE DR 1085 ~~rT v ORCtiq~p ORCHARD HILL DR rc~~ COQ ~ yf 1098 A RD Ip99 << ao A N A -i A r' z tiv ~ Q'~ ~lRld SPRINGER _ . I~~'O Gf 23 ~,D SETTER RD W J 1221 ~ a A ~ o t' ~ ~ U A AV 450 CHALLENGER HUNTRIDGE RUAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ]7 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ROANOKE CITY _ __ ROANDKE CDUNTY ~ I ~~~~ `G ~ ~ a `~ a Y Z ^ ~ m Q ~ ~ ~ U W ~ I C I CHELSEA ST as 833 = r I I N I I I I I N CO A fO G~ z y ~ A a 1~s 9~~ l~7 q ~ ~'P Y N O ~ ~ ~ ~ Pq W O ~9~ ~P~~ j<<0~~9 ~~v sr i O`'f RbR~~K 93 dR 2 WESTERN HILLS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 19 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING b~pD HAVEN RD 152a 'SSO ~ d W PARK N DR OR R Ty <q ~? k ~ DEER 4 1 5D F F. IS~y dip ,~~~" ~~ ~ ~ C PL ~~~ 1,P ~ ~ TAMARISK CR ~ ~ ~ e ~~ v ~J~S~fl 1731 ~ ~ 1y81 J Z Ul Wo A 0~ PIN OAK DR 172`1 £ a N o rr'+ lAp9 N~~Epw ER v pU a < ~ 1733 v 15'1 PIS. ~N < ~p~ TWILIGHT RD 1577 LAMPLIGHTER DR 1583 ~y rs 9d ~j O~ 2~~~? ~~~ ti Q Z yr ~ ~ ?i A NORTH LAKES PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ti~~r ~~ jS ti ~~ l 9,~ F ,S 6 Z 1579 J W NORTH GAR~~N a a °~ 159gMER DR z° OAKMONT CR ~~ SQ~~~~ tihh~ ~Q. Aq R,F AV NORTHSIDE RD v ~° A A ~ _ m A WADE ST (PRIVATE) CREEK RD 21 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ~j 1NSER~ G~ 2y P.(~ ,Lo ~- ~Q. ~ ry~~~a ~~~,~ ~o~j X00 40 d ~~ ~~ ,tis ~b 2~ 0 ~o ~ o m d m 9fi A R EDGE RD O~~S~ CEDA 2p35 J`S,~p F ZD.jb ..~ o ~ p d r A 9R 9VE t~ Fo~~S 95~ ~~ ,~~P ~pla sT Ova 2 ~ ~ 2 F' at 1,9SO dCF ~ $~ FOREST EDGE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 23 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING THE WOODLANDS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 2~ ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING HIDDEN VALLEY COURT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 27 ANDREW LEWIS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PLACE 29 ROANOKE C~~ `_~'e1TY DESIGNATION OF t'~~NDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ~G d~ /s c~< y 9p' ~y~~~y5 A O W X W 3 r Q a ~ a ^ y0 o. w S ~ ~ `d~A r D S~ 9 O'F fz1Q~~~P~~-~ ~l ^1G G c~ ~d NORTH RD `Q y '9 / ry 1441 ~m y~ r C ti~ s d,P EX 5 R1 PSHJ P ~, 4~ RED LANE 'Ip5 ~1 Q ~ti P~ O ~4i~ ti1 ~~ Qy ,Z`~ p ti EDGEBR~~K RD A~fL9~~ ROCK ~EB 9 RD 1150 .~ dp ED ~ 1150 ' EDGEB ROOK ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 31 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ~TEY LANE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 33 WASHINGi"~N n~i ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ROME DR 1226 WINESAP DR = 1084 o m 2 0 .. GQLDEN CR 1 JONATHAN LA ~ ~, R~ 1085 'yA,9C MFR LABRADORE DR 1227 ST RIDGE ,fi HARVE t 1085 RD ,d PLE TREE 1085 DR AppLE TREE 1085 '~-ptT rv O~Ch'gp pRCHARD HILL DR r~,~q CR ~ of 1098 C C r RD 1p99 A N A -i ° ~ yvN ~ ~ T~, f d CF l~~ SPRIN p ~ d SETTER ~ 1221 c a -Zi N A w J o ° c-. ~ m ~ z ey CHALLENGER AV 460 HUN TRIDGE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 35 D ~i ii L Li 1 1 DIUGUIDS LANE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 37 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARIN i~ ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING BUCK MpUNtAIN R11 z ra Y ~. KING'S CHASE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 39 ROANOKE COUNTY DEIGNATIOTv OF FUNDS FOR FY ~5-96 REVENUE SHARING NFAT1Se yl<< D W oOD 6gVfN RD 2 R 28 dFE,R i524 ISpgR~- ___ A tip,~l SD dR ~ DR ~, ~ RK <" Z ~ pp ..,:,,~E' ~,~' ~`. ~v DEE"< 155Q jS~4 dR ~~~ ~ a P~~c~ CR r S~FS~~ '~ G ~ ~ o v° TAM ;- ~-, ~IE~c,P` ~ ~ t~ .- \ ~ d ~ N O ¢' O o , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1579 W NORtH GgRDEN IN 2 A pIN OAK UR )W a 1729 ~ W ~ SUM/yER v v ~ n 159 DR 1509 ~~~w CR o ~ 5 ro o ~ pUAI1- NO z DAKMpNT CR '~ 1733 < 1QXj P' ` ~ +< 1580 ~ ,, ti ?~~Q2~0 e n a z a v r ~ ~' -~ ~~ T WILIGHT RD V 1577 ~Q~ti? ~g~0 ~~ ~~ LAMPL,uHTER DR 1O~T~' aO QQ~ ~.`TYr 1583 `~ `fc~T , ~ SOS' q ~R A L \\ c TANSY DRIVE ® PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IPLEDALE AV NORTHSIDE RD 1523 ~ °° A ~ < _ m A v G~ W J WADE S7 4~ cPRlvaTf~ ~ ~ CRE~E,~ D 117 0 ;CI ~ 3 o Z 0 d A DR ~A c z `o a (,%: ; ~: c Id 41 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING STONEBRIDGE COURT ® PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 43 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING RD '/~ KEpD-~ ~ 68g ~ q V ~ o. / ~ ~ u / !,~_fljr W 1 ~i ~~ 1 pNSDALE itij F4 131 Gy j b05 ~~.'~ b2 1 ~ VYNNE RD ~~ 1314 1 CLUB LN 1443 yC~fTT~ 9~ f~.cd I 'Pd ~ a~~~~''0h N A P ~ 4 / / `~EMOkT ~ 1446 / i FARMINGDALE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 45 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 95-96 REVENUE SHARING ROME DR 1226 yINESAP DR = 1084 py Z CS GDL~DEN CR i J4NATHAh LA ~ RL U ~ l08 yAAC k H N 3 a LABRADQp.E DR a ST RIT1~ 122 HARVE 1086 RD ! r TR 1085 APPLc T 1085 O,p QRGHARD HILL ~'f' cygp ~ cep yI, 1098 ~~ t RD < x N ~J -4 + G m ~ y~yl~ ~ ~ ld GF l2 ' SPR.NGER 3 t 0 ~ d SETTER RD W 1221 Z ~ N N ~ ~ ~ C ~ m J U b CHALLEPIGER AV 460 APPLEw00D, THE O RCHARDS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 47 ROANOKECOUNTY SIX YEAR SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 1995-1996 VDOT'S REVENUE SHARING PLAN ENCLOSURE 2 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (SALEM DISTRICT) J 48 i 1 i 1 r r l 49 g Xd Q Q O In .p. o o N 0 N 0 Yl 0 N 0 IN 0 117 0 N r ~ Z o 1~ Y7 T O~ O~ O~ T m Q~ `D N f\ (h M O C~ r U r., r 2 3 x 3 2 3 x 3 x 3 2 3 x io O a a j Wrw^ wza~ a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ww ~~zv z z z z z z z z z z ~ Y ym\O F r r r ~ r r r r r .~ ~ ~ W O U A A A A A A A A A A 'so~~ > > > > > > > > > > ~ o W Q O ~ ~ M x x x x x x x x x x I Ow 1-Z iy Yy Zy SY xy ZN Sy Sy iy xy W W y°o r~ 2 rx Z r~ Z ry Z3 r# Z r~ Z -1 rx ZN r# Z~ ra Z~ r~ ZY7 C.~ ~ ow M a.o J ~ a.o J ~ a.n J n ¢1n J~D ~ a,p J... y ¢a J.~ a,p J.r ¢.n J... <.o J~ ¢,n J.r Q Q 3m .r a ... a .. a a-~ a a a a a a C! D rr m W~ ' N N N N N N W N W N W N W N W Q_ O Z d N W a~ W Y W Y W Y W Y W Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 ~° ~ ~ ~oY i °z °z i °z °z °z °z °z i m Z.. r w ~°a~ r r r r r r r r r r ~ O~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N O O U (A VI Y Q o U O T ~ INfI 11 ~. ~ M W ,°p ~ c7 ~ ~ Q a >w c ~ C ~ J . N z Q >- O Q NON {~ ^ Z ~ O Z M O N ZM O N lllW WoWO O ~ 1Q~ O N C7W 11~~ O`DN o IAN R'( h 1 O~ Np3H I'- Z Q Z Z 00 Z~Q Nti a ~ ax N ~N=N W SNQ y W~G1 O~ T RN'.y ~.+ N d.NCI! N W d,NQ pp IW-NA W~'ZW W ~r OIW-~ W W ~HWr W PI ZrcW r J M-~F~ r W 7 Zr "' U ZO'Z~ F J Zr= .. U H J r=iF~ W 1 ~r~ r ~ A ti~rJ LL U~ Q GRU R:Of r ~~ R' O oKU Q ~ ~U KKU W K u `,, ` L v ~ ~ N W 1` R' ~ W ~ W N roZ W ~ 4 Or ~ 4 .L W Z 4 r W O ~ W o z Cfl Y ~O^ a O j~ Q x d' W o M o N N N o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 M ~ Z ~ w... Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Z d^ ~ .M-i c < N o N 0 N 0 Y o O c N o ~ 0 . . 0 r ~ ~ c ~ L~ o W ~ r °ww\ W W W J Z~ ~' W Y W Y W Y W Y W Y Y Y W Y Y W Y ~; ~ Z OtOa a? i z i i i i i z i i z In xO^ °o °0 8 N uoi °o c ~ 0 ° 0 O U Z M `~' v v ro .o v OD ui GD vi < o: a o: O v o nT v ~ J zo W Q F-j o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c ~ M ° O N W m V Y V o Y Q O~ O m Y U) It) O~ O~ O (LT f (n U Z ~ O U U U z _ w J W J Q Vk A Z J q A a ~ Fi ~ r J _ ~rW1~ NrJJiN NWO M INV ~° NIW'lo NKYj N~III NWN NQf~ NYdD NO7 UpF- hxN Y 7 .Q.W IMfI W.~. VMIW~ YMIU" 1 NWN ~~N ~ON ~KN ~1.Yr ~Z~ d. O NSW ODxr o2W u7 F.r o~W U1Nr orW 1l1Nr NW If7Wr ~ NQ,W MQr ~pWW MQr 1~1W Mir ~OWOW MYr <ZW v=r d Q.O m .~.~Q~ 0O~ ti~K O ^4W'tr O 'P"OC NWK Nye N~~ Z NQ~R' ~.,FK O ~ Z 1. U ; 3 N N N N N N N N N M 50 1 °~ ~ Z ° ° d' W W a~zv Z Z Z Z W r Z Z z z I ~ V d' W ~ A A A U ' ° ° ° ° ° S D I ~ O ~OQ& > > > q > ~ . G 1 > n- > n. > > > 0 L.L Q O ~ vI N Ow xr xr xr xr N wz x 6Q. Z ~°~~ ~ xr x x ~yf W ~Z Yp ~ EN F 1P zin EN F-O zu~ Y Vl H~ zin S \ r A zN QZ 2W Q> Z N ~,,, ~ zN ~ Z7 W 3~ a°°~ SN F s zin S Vl F-m zn Sfi] 1-a zin C~ f- 99 w ¢ .n a ~n ¢ ~o ~ :n ~ ° ¢ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ¢ ~n a ~o a ~o r m W~ 0 fA N N Vl W (n N N N N y Q:0 d~Z aww W r W r W r r W Y W r W r W r W Y W r ¢~ ° ~ ~p ~ r z i z ° z z i i z = i ~ v m Z r w Z p V F- ~ ~O~ ~ N N N N N N l 7 N '- y~ H y O O U N In r ¢ ° N n ° 0 0 0 U 2 K N .N. N .. Y .N. foil No m W ... O ~' a ~ Z_ ~ ~ oMOm ~~~ Wo vU¢, o a o o °m3ro o z oo~Y o 0 0 ~a Q ~ ~--- Z Q Z Z ~ Ob N~NV LL.-. ~.. W W MW Vlpq ~... ~ m ~ ln~W R q yN3N d'N O. W~OS~O y`pN~ Koy d'.. W.. W NN N R.r ...r W"'2^' MW Nf") Q'Dq NN yN a'.N.~N W W" InNNN Q:NKN W"W~" NOVIN ~NQ:N W"' WN W ~ ~ ~~ ~Z ~ r~ HW~ f J ~ MW Z S H Z W ~ "" ~W~W ~o~ ~ a ~ I-W ~-W Z ~~ ~' WF Z Z . F /- ~ H LL ~ . . Q: R a Z~U ZFV ~ .~<~ n K ~ ~ O:° ° Z ~O . . ~ O r i ~. . ~R' ~ ~ ~ O rZ 4W ~ ~ 4 0 O T ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ° ~ O LL W Z O F- ~ W ° Z cfl Y ~ O ~w m M ~ m .a. M ~ N N N O~ W I z ~ ~ 0... L[~ Q Q ~ O ~ ' z ~ ~ O d ^ Za~ ti ~ O 0 c ~ O ~D N N-~ 0 (' ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 o c c o L.L ~ O W ~- ww W r ~ ZKr W W W y W W = W ~ r r r ~ r r r W r W r ~3N ~~Z a p'° ~ ¢ \ a \ a \ i ¢ z a i ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ ~ a a? z z z i i i ° zN ° °O _°~ Z N o N 0 n 0 M ~ ~ o p o °o N 0 ~ F ¢~ v ri YI ~D N ti N V (lT e ~ c G W zp J ~ $ o 0 (n Z m M O= " N n n ui M .~ M o N N N N N e u°~ a° ~ Z » ~ ai a j= o U Z U W ~ ~ f- ~ J ~ J q ~~ ~2~ VWW M°V M°Q MqT M°M ~y< M~('1 f")q.~ f")pM a~C) M o NYO M°If1 C1JO M M mod'... MdN m~M MdN ~~V m>N W OF- p Z' Y13.~r < ~°.p. ~~ N°.a.. l. ~°.-. ~~ y~W.. ~J ~°a,.i q r V1W" cZ NW... ~ H Vf~N. Z In W.-. a¢ ~ ~ O d ZW OS~ ~ F~ W MW/- pWd' a W C1Zf" ""d' a W fM'1¢~ .. ~ W ~W~ .. ~ o WW N{.~ ~ d W (`7~~ ..Ud' " W ~W~ NK M NKr Ndd W NH~ Ndd' d Om . r ¢ ~Ci . . ~ _ ,,. Fi W ^N ^ W M N M M M d' M 1n M c0 M I~ M O M O~ M O ~! 51 xa0 a f 0 0 0 0 ~` 0 ~ ~ .Pi °f 0 ~ r Z P ~ P O ~ ~ n n ~ f 11i y7 n M D 1 ~D `D . p O ~ A O r ¢ U U U 1- ~ 1 2 3 S 3 S 3 = ~ 0~ Q~Z} p Z Z 2 Z Z Y 2 Z Z pp Z Y Ym~ ~ r r r r r ^ ~p I ~ Q w O pp q A OO fi A A U q A Q A I p 30> ~ > > > > > ~ > > > > ~ D ~ Q O ~ r z ~ w ¢ z ~ N ~Z x Sy x SN x Sy x E(}h ~ d j ^ x} Sy ~} Sy x} Sy x E} W W O ~m ~ zo ~ zu;i ~ zu~i ~ F- zuxi ~ r a ~ r~ zu`i rx z1n rx z1n rN zs C~ f- o w a lv a ~o a ~n a ~o ~ W a ~o J.+ a .n J~+ a .o J~ a In Q Q 3 m JN a J.+ a J.~ a J.+ a > W a a a J~p n..-. ~ ~ ~ U z = u }r m W~ (~ N N N N y y N N N N a~ Z a w''r a > Y } Y ~ y } > Y Y laola1 p~~ ^ ^ z ^ z ^ z ^ z i ° i i i ~j} m z `~ z z r w waQ r r r r F- ~ O~ ^ ~ ^ N N y N y y y N N y U ~ ~ a O f °f N -~. Y Q N c 0 Q. 0 W ~ Ul I N N _y W ~ (D M ~ ~ W ~ M K! Q ~ a Z Q F' ~ ~ S H N I~ 6 ^p.N W a ^o~f' W 6 OION ^ ^ NODN OD N N ^ W W I~r1. oSO ^ f W NF N N^ W fNN .+0.'f ^ ^ Iny~ Npp ^ al DD 1 N W Z ~ z Z Q Z O yCl JF. a'~0 ~~pq KNO ~Nq 2~f0 5~~~ ~K S.wN r. ZWFW,.~ H ~,,, W`DWf W nq W = Q ~ ~ lY NJ~W }Zr HWJ ~r^ 1W-WJ Hr HWJ ~r7 Il1W W Or.^.r ~ ~ fWMW lnror fWtZ' IIIrW rZW ZK^r 1'WZW .Z. r""r ~ ~ Zr~ .. d,U L.L ~ O 4U ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ am? a' a U U ^ F' K p ~ r ^ ~ w r R ^ ~. r ~ ^ 1~ r ~ ~ W K I W^^ r ~ ~ ^ L~ W Z - . ~ ^ O~ W ° a ~ O a' W N l^`1 M m M N N ti N W op CI O\ ~ Z ~ .., W 0 Q z~rn0 ~ ~~ ~ .. Za~ ~ o ~ o 0 c o c a 0 N o ~, ~ r ~ ~ 0 o o G o ~ l.L o W } ~ o> z~ J N N Q O Q' } j Z N > N Y N Y > ~ p Z N i N i N > N ~ = ~3 f f /1 Q`Og i z z z z z z i z i ~ a a? c~ ?~ Z M = 0 o 0 0 0 o °0 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ( j v . D h m D m N . D 7 h o o Q n o T c a~ ~ - M N 00 ~ c L O J W Q ~~ 0 0 0 0 °0 0 0 0 0 0 J ~ ~mM .OD m ~ N ~ o o f0. °o ~ Q O~ 117 iD (lr ...7 M N Q m Q~ oti (n U Z r U V U z _ W ~ ~ ~ W Q'Ik Z W U tY U A o _ 0 ~ ~Z~ W O 7JO M" q^ Tao ~(=j0 ar-~ MOO Q~N ~r0 aql~ ~}h IAW~ MQp M~N M}O ~Zf7 MJa ~~N MF ~' 4'WU7 Map G W ~ U ) 1 = I N V1~N f..I 1 aN N 1 w-+ Il1~^. ~ In J... NP7... J ( ~l ~r ~r OZO ~- a m ~1 7~ n r K oq ~UW o Z r Nye ~ W O X r N^~ SW o r r Nj~ oaW ~ r r ~ WW O Z r .o+^~ NJW Par ~~Q: M W f U r ~ K NSW ~ U r M.S~ IA jW o d r ~a~ 0 I~ = r N . ¢ f f '~}' fi ~ ~ d' ~ f N 52 53 ~, ACTION NO. ITEM NO. / / /'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for At~ril 25, 1995. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone 3.06 acres from I-1 conditional and C- 1 conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Assoc. 2) An ordinance to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 conditional to C- 1 to construct a learning center, located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties Inc. 3) An ordinance to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C-1 and C-2 conditional to C-2 to construct a supermarket and drug store, located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties Inc. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~S OFFICE. ~, r ~- y-r- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 25, 1995. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use onty "/ date ~~ ceived by: app cati~ fe jC~' PCr • r1 ~%~~ ` .J placards i;sued: / 605 date• ~ ~ 5 a ~~ ~ .~5 9 Case fVumber: / /~ ~ ~ ~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): © REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Benjamin Buret Phone: 4 7 3 -3 3 2 3 Address: 3 4 9 4 Farmers Road Zip Code: 2 4 0 9 0 Fincastle, VA wner's name: Reformation Herald Publishing Association Phone: 366-9400 Address: 5240 Hollins Road, N.E. Zip Code: 24019 Roanoke VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 39.05-1-10 5240 Hollins Road, N.E. Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: M-1/B-1 ~ yC~ ,~-~~ 3.06 acres Existing Land Use: Storage and repackaging of church related sq.ft. literature and administrative offices. • Proposed Zoning: C-1 For Staff Use On/y . Proposed Land Use: The adriinistrative offices and thatch services xhich xere operating tetrporarilp use Type: , frog the property at SZ40 and 5248 Hollins Road xill continue xith basiness as nsaal Eros the nex • building at 5240, xhich is now is the final stages of corrpletioa. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. • If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan X Application fee X A lication ;ti;;`. PP '~~ Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable X Justification ~"'•~s Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consen f owner. Owner's Signature: ~-!~ Foi Slaff Use On/y: Case Number ~~~ Applicant _ Beni amin Burec The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Be rezoning this parcel, the land will be protected from overcrowding, there will not be an increase of population to the community, and foremost the community will be improved by having an attractive new building with professional landscaping in the area. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. By changing our property from M-1/B-1 to C-~1, it will be more in conformity to the adjacent properties and the general guidelines and policies of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation; and fire/rescue. The impact to the community will be nil, since all previous operations will continue as in the past, except that now it will be coming from a new building, instead of a house and a dilapidated, old building. We plan to enhance the two properties with professional landscaping. The property at 5240, although under a different name, belongs to the same church organization that has ownership of the property at 5248 Hollins Road. At this time we do not anticipate any increase in traffic. The property at 5248 will be used for the caretaker and some light office work. The old house at 5240 will be demolished to accommodate space for a driveway,. parking lot, and landscaping. • elulHrl~'a>toueoy 6wp~inq sa~if~o ~eaaua6 ~ . ~ > IE~z9s.EO~.,..__. .~ ~,.~o,,,~ ~ v 1N3W3/~OW W~i0~3~! ' ~loa .~"1~.1„ •,d"~~EI _°.,~.° a ;~ T `( o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MN Duo ~1su s~sie 1SI1N3l~ab'Ab'a H1N3/~3S ,d •,3y~su3H P,e~ a 3'WOa~ •.....,...; u V 1 , - q!F 99 yp~ • Y n~r~~U ~+ FQ~ 7 ~br ~~a i>y 3 ~_ >~ zp v~ V o ~ W" r~Y :~ y 8tp 0a ~'iJ ~roB~I ~ 3 ~ ~0;~~ rte- -~'•.`- '~ ~+ ~va~ i~~;9 jWtl~ ~Q Uu$u~ N - J z ~ q~- ,__ ; v o aac~ ~ ~mn g<`a ~~ u N z w u g~'o / __.. d ~ -- o r ~jn 3 Qoo>, . 4,~.~vn ~ a alb ~ a ' ••.. '~' ~1I eiG 1 ~~: ~I~ Sp R7 ~y ~ ; I . •~. _.=' ~ P ,Qv :t ~. \ _........... v .2 0 n~~ a ~~~ .. o a ,b '`. I s _ ~3Q ~.~ ~`\L ~•. .` ~i. ~Hi 1 ~~ ~' ~.co.~a:GO ~ I _ ly ~ ~ =v, o ~, \~.\•,\\ ,``'~ •\i ~j..h ~h -.~ ~.,. IGYI~GI _ I3 Y? I ~ ~ , ~ -~ b q a'~ \ . ` ~~~ any \ ~ ~~ 1 Et ~ 1 , , 1, ~ ! ? ~ 1 s~ ~ ~ \ ,~ ~ y 7 "n I \ ' L •.t t ti ~: _ ... -~. l ~ Z ?:~.~.. . !- L `i t `~ _v ~+ t E t i ::r.~ .::.~.::.:. .;.r..: 9 e _~ i s ::,. . ,: I '~:r::: s i' ::r;.:: ;.<.;. ~~ 9. r 1 tr3. `~ I I >' ~ ~ E r e i p .;~::: :.:~.. %X . t y 9 1~ ~g~ o y,~ ~ .~ x t + 0 1 } :.:~- .: ~.:: ii t rw e 0 C t ,f _! I { i P :1:: p 4 e i. ~ - t I ~~ f 5 e `4 :t: :: ) { •:::~ 1 ( .. r o a. 4. !s 3 ?:::4Z3~'o`.,:r:' is ;trzt'a`.e>'=z':;::.:. . i 1t i / 0.2 f;: i it r • :;~:::.:.:: :;'~:: ::~r:.~g~Fz: .::6:: p ee-3 .~ ~ - . i<` f ! r e a e~ :-`~j:` ~: a 4 r t• r ' :i' e .r !- pp S~ .r;~`: r;~ +n. t i f o: r~' r ~9l~~ S a y~ !' j,~ o € ms's:::<'.: Syr _ '~l ::>:%>;i3•: ;. ''1t ±:.::; :; :;f? :<~:: s:< ~ :g> Mme...., ::::.r~:.f~;:~.>;::?.~:. ..:~:r:~"t'.':s:>':i:..::f::'if ~F; T•.~ SN ani~'.. ,o~~_ti'-..~;"[~~ytcC~i:~f:rirl:`:c:.::1,.:;:,;rt%::%:;~:~E~,~.,rJr~'?F .:. ~: .:::: :.:?~:;: a: ::::f e_l~a ap .S • 7~j~~n asT~-_ ~ 1 , i j"l; ~ ~ ~~~J I ~r 1 i°aSs ~e / i ~ .. s::::: cr ~' q ee vQr2 i ! ;' : I ~ ~~~:~ ~~s 3x0^' I e`'~$ ~5 ~°~°iu ~ I ~ r l6"~°[ tt~ I p ee°. 9 F9a 2 P 0 _ r N~ u c r m u o - N 1 N a O H-I e,~~rv,n•a~o~eod 6uip~inq sa~if~o Ieaaua6 • ~ • • •~ • • 1N3W3/~OW Wb0~3b 1SIlN3ndb' Ab'4 H1N3/~3S ~ ! ;«~~~-~ .._._.._ ~~ <<o.z~l~l6~l~•~«~d ..,.,.,, i mNV~v~~~n~~»ec~e~ ~,is ,d q.y~susH pjouod :u-etl-[ ~' v \ d ~ T ~ ~ I I P nR a I (Y Z ~2 ~1! 1 R ~~ o ~i 4 ~aa^`u }yrl~nYS. ~ - - - - - - ._._ - - - ~ ST~711 TOA ~ ~ j~ n~ 3.. H JS.. 1 S I 1 -- = -~ Sb..:--..- . - -~--3~Nd1S1a 1H715 - ............A... ._ ... - _... ~ _ ~_ _ a~ f _.. . MOC. .._ r ~. 7 ,. _ -- q.. ` y (Y ... _.__.. _ ~; ~ -~... _ .. ....- . y - ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ _ ..... _. ~.. ~-') - _ - ._...._..__..__. .. _~T...._ ..-, .. _ ~~_ i ... .- ,.. -~..._ ....... .... _.` _`~~._."". __ d .. .- _.- _. t ~ _ . _..-_..____.~ I ., ._ _. -.. t.___-- -~~ - . ~ • Y w I- M ~ p . t Q Q ~~ ", ~ ~•~ ~ d ~ • o •~ , °/ .~+ ~. ., r..a•_:irt.,El. X11 A ~° r ° ~ ®n ~ 0 u u \ ....s.n p tl ~ 4 ' ' $ ®n %% ~I .' \ • ._. : 4 S _ , f '-' Z7 it - ' ~ -`~ . . ~ .. ..~. r ~ Cn a o E "' ~y~ ainv la.GlL-'~7nlcLrw :'~• ~cal,uv ~rvl~xa ', : ~ 6 t - _ .f •: ~. .:.t h w • •, , _ - '' , .r -. _ ' ~` „~.,; ''~:kE - ,~~o?F wig-. - ~ ~ i ~ l ~LL ~ Fir+~ti ~~ ` I F J ~ a4~ ~~ a ~ ~ ~~ - I ~ ~ ~® Fu.. ~ 8~ ciQ~ ~ 63J~@ •~ '•~ ' ~~ ~ - - --•--- - X ..` ~ i 5G3 !e~ !F ~ :: ' ~nl of a~ 1 ...... ' . .- , f... --' _- -_ r> ~r ~ '-' ~ ~ ., ~.71a2T~G'~' ~ f } ~-so~ di i .• b ' f -• ~[r a $ _ \- ° i!-i ~ ~~51ed3 c7 „ w - . i i t ,; -_ i -' i - r ' ' ~ . _ _ -- _ - Q _ _ _ :' - - .. : ; , .: , . i ,: ... _ .- -,. ;.: • . ••- r' i - - _- _. ~~~ . ~; ;~ ; V / .. ~ ~ ' - e .~ ~ ~ ...___....., ~ ,~ :. ..._..~_.... rf i i .,, i~~ :' .' .. .....__.... ' ~ G ' ..~rr - _ _ ssa ~ ~ - - -- - - ~~ ` ~~~ - / : ,. .- . r yO .~~ i .... ,.: ,- .: ;. . i ' ~ ~ - ,; ..: 7i~~Z eke .. •' ~ :~ .....:.. ~ p _ . ' ~ ~ -- ~~ ~ ( ~ i P -- o N 4.. I'll ~W_]HCZITIG~. ._~_ '(1d1'IM "~13 /y: -. ~SOTT- A~L7 Wa0a1 aO..moCl.____ ....... _ _ il"7II97 ~ ~ a tl - u R-1 ROANORE COQNTY DTILITY DEP?~RTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEw'ER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date February 17, 1995 Name of Applicant_Ben-jamin Burec Phone 473-3323 Address of Applicant 3494 Farmers Road, Fincastle, VA 24090 N-' . Reformation Herald Publ. Assn. 366-9400 Name of Developer SDA Reform Movement Phone 362-1800 5240 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Address of Developer 5248 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA Name of Design Engineer Donald Henschel Phone 562-3174 Address of Design Engineer 1317 Peters Creek Road, N.W., Roanoke, VA Name of Contact Person Benjamin Burec Name of Proposed Development N/A Typ e of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) N/A Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MA.P Ai~ID PLPNP.~TRIC \i.~~ER): Size of proposed development in acres: 3.06 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (ovEa) Signature of Applicant :y -. `C ~.7 11 \\,. C'~ y~~ Ilnllln f 1 •,_~I. .:• ~ i~f~ll / \\: ~ - _:' f ~ _~ I X1199 :1 ~-. ~~~~ ~'`V `~~. L~x.~~.v I~~~~ ~ ~ J;. ~1~:~ ° C`f !~ :i ~ti /66 ~ll ~ % ~ _V .1 _ ~~. ~ `' ,~~' _ ~ ` ;`~~~~if.• .~\~-HOLL[N ~\J/~~Ma'Sll ~ /.~~I~.Cernr~~ ~/ ~I~ ~,I ~!7/:`~` i ~~;r\~ •~. ..~\1 r~•.t- ( ~~~ ~.~~° ~^ ~1/, ;7`GOL EC~i~/~c L~'3,. is B 0'~. •~: i" "~ '.~j~'~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~a•J .i jpO __ • ~_'•i~\ ~~~~1% P u ~P~1 ~1 (Ii\ ~ ilp~ ~ :'r' I ~ ~~' ~ ~~ ~qv ~~ i• rr T^` ~ I •/ ~'D S \ ~;Xy B ~ 'rl~Elrrrififyn `~'~~~~. / `\ ~,_J'-/ ; 1 ~L1 ~o.~ ,•~~ '~ '- v f ~~;~ ~/~ \ ,l`~L \l~~ t •ii55x J/'~ /~~_~J`r, Q`` - ~ °` - ~~~\~_=~~\~ 1 a~, ~_% -`, ~~115 . ~~ 1r1'' ~ \„1 r\~ / / ~~F~k ~ 1"9 i.~ • 6D7~ ~~ \ ~ `~'.~ ~ ~ \ ~~ ~~ Li~_,l,~i~ ~~~ ~ I . ,~ ~~/l J// //~( c_ . ~, ~;~ ~ ,1,~~`~~` ° \( ~G ~y~ ~;~, /i~~" _ _ ~ /Jt ( 1C9", ~f ~/?l ~ ~ I 0 ~~ \ I("~//~0~`,'..~\r ~~' ~_ ~ ~ 1 ~y~: ~(', (Hollin~l' 7~f~ ~~>.'„~ 2 ~ ~ _ q~~ ., ~ Sao _a" I o ,,.i,~- ~~~ \~\~ _ Ertl er ~~~ ~~ I Ir(~~ ~ III' ~ 111 ri .\~~ I ~p ~ - ~ - ~~( I I~~I ~~J ~~ e \b t\. o •;~r~~. ~ 1 1 ~~ ~ _--- - .~ 1. i Pa rift' 2 I ~~~' ~ ~ ~~r~ ~~~~'; ~ ~~) ~ ~-!~ 11:~_'~ 1 C\`~l\ %j' '\J :1 I le l'~ --~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ /~~~~~ rte` ~~1 =~ p~~~ f;: y 0 ~~~ - r•~ „~~r lo!~` ^~~ _ -~~~ Abp%~~ ~~~ /,~ ,., ~ l~m°I) ~~~ ; ,~ A "%~ ~ o, twin ievir% - - - ~ ~ rl .~-,~~~. ~ ~~ ! ~ i~r' 4~~ ~ ~ ~J~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,. `v ~ i .1 _ ~ ~, .A, o, ~ i, ~V~ 1 ,~ o o A, A~. ~~~ ~ ~'/! ~!'11 1900 .~ v ~ ~ v,,; f p /~ - l AVE L ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1~ ~~ '' ~t --~ ~,- ~~ a >;~~ '~ O/ ~ ~ ~" • ~R TON I ~ ~_ _ A_. L `+- reston Yar ~1 ~ ~.~~j • ~ - L E~ IJ, ~ Ja A V ,~~ ~ y Br kenr~ ~~J ~ x~// o ' j r FIi C ° ~ r C~~~~ ~~'r~© ° `oOa. J ~ °' 'v i ~ ~ ~ ~`~~ ~ ~ ~ ~/^o1 ~+ I,~~. \ If op <~ Oa ~ nrj ~u, ~~ 1 _ it ~+'i:. ~\ ~~ : ~ l'` ''ryQ ~ ~ ~ ~~; ' 1 Its j; ~• ~~l ~ ~~~ ~, ~ ^ \ \..;I 1 \ ~P`' , i ~' II IO ,~~7 l ~ ~ (f 1 ,~f~t\\~- (~ o !J ~~' ••/• I `~7 ~~ e ill ~~~ ~ \_ ~ ~ ~/- I: _ 1 ! ~\~ ~-~.j~zo;P J 6 ' off ~ rs / ~ ~ ,~ `l ' (r ~ ~ ~ti•~~ '~FI I{rl Rd ~°~ I ~ q` ~~_~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ I ~.~o o ~ ~/ / ! _1~~ ~oa J ., p ~}-I NORTH . _ ~~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOC. Z - AND ZONING TAX # 39.05-1-10 ~_ . ~~~ ., L DEPT: OF PLANNING AND ZONING • 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.o. Box 2ssoo Roanoke, VA 24018 ~ ~_ ~~ (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date rec -~~~/ applieatio fee- ll~ i pfacsrds issued: -~ Case Number-. .....................:.:.:.:.:.:.:..::: Check - - ::a:...~:.:r~:~: type of application filed (check aU that apply): C~ REZONING Q-SPECIAL USE . Ql/ARIANCE' Applicant's name: Alliance Properties, Inc. Phone• 983-7662 Address• c/o James F. Douthat, P.O. Box 14125, Roanoke, VA • • 24038-4125 Zip Code Owner's name: ~ Thomas E. ~.Tilson and :fargaret E. j•?ilson Phone: Address: 5065,Balsam Avenue, S.W. , Roanoke, VA Zip Code:- Location of property Tax Map Number: Intersection of Brambleton and 86.08-1-1 Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring 4903 Colonial Avenue, Roanoke, VA • Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-1 , cond i t i one I _ 0.49 acres Existing Land Use: Office Building sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C-1 Proposed Land Use: Janus Learning Center rec aos ~ ~~/ for Staff Usi Only Use Typs; i ......... .............. oes the parcel meet the minimum )ot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested dtsirictt- YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST: Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. if rezoning request, are conditions bein NOT AT T$ZS TLS ................................•-• • • - -•---•-• . - . g protfered with this request? YES NO X Variance of Section(s) . of the Roanoke--Coun .:::: .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::': ty Zoning Ordinance in orderto: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED 1F ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Rrs v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1' concept plan ~ v Application Application fee .. Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the prope~lor the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/ed~o s„~~____ _~. Owner's Si nature; Alli ce, opert3~, nc. g By ~ / ~, VIRGINIA: ^~ t'~''d~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE r IN RE: REZONING OF A TRACT OF )PETITION TO REZONE LAND CONTAINING 0.49 OF AN ACRE, ) KNOWN AS 4903 COLONIAL AVENUE, S.W.) FROM C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT WITH ) CONDITIONS TO C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. Alliance Properties, Inc. has entered into an agreement with Thomas E. Wilson and Margaret E. Wilson to purchase the 0.49 acre tract of land bearing tax identification no. 86.08-1-1 which is located at 4903 Colonial Avenue. 2. Your petitioners desire to purchase this property in _ order that the existing structure may be removed and a new structure placed on the premises to house the Janus Learning Center which is currently located at 4929 Colonial Avenue. This property is currently zoned C-1 Office District, with conditions that limit the office use. 3. Pursuant to Section 30.1 et seq. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the petitioners request this property be rezoned from its current zoning to C-1 Office District for the purpose set forth above. This petition is filed in conjunction with a similar petition filed by Alliance Properties, Inc. to consolidate and rezone adjacent parcels of woods. Roc~xs 6r x~c~ave, p.~.c. 60829 - 2 - ~~ land at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton I'~"'~"' Avenue. 4. The petitioners believe that the rezoning will further the intent and purpose of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan in that the rezoning will result only in the elimination or modification of existing conditions on the property to allow the construction of the building for and the operation of the Janus Learning Center on the site. The zoning classification C-1 Office District, will not change other than to allow the Janus Learning Center to move from its current location and to replace their existing building with a modern state of the art facility. The rezoning will result in an increase of real estate tax base of ~_ Roanoke County, conform to the existing office use in the area and cause the property to act as a buffer between the commercial use adjacent to Brambleton Avenue and the residential use along Colonial Avenue. 5. The proposed rezoning conforms with the guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan in that it proposes a use for the property contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and will allow the construction of an attractive facility which can be sited to take into consideration the proposed grade change on Colonial Avenue access the property which will result in a more attractive and ~~oo~s. Rocs & H.~c~ove.p.~.c. efficient facility and improve traffic. flow in the area. 60829 _ 3 _ ~-~- 6. The proposed rezoning will have no negative impact on the adjoining properties in that it will continue office use by an entity that has been located in the area for a number of years. Adequate water, sewer and road access are available to the site and public service, in addition to that already provided to the site, will not be required. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Properties, Inc. Thomas E. Wilson Mar et E. 'lson By: ~ . Of Counsel James F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 WOODS. ROGERS 6Z II t'LaZLEGRCNE. P.L.G. 260829 ~anuanb' ~o!uo~o - ~~ L89 a~no~ _ __ - 80' r---- --- I ,~ I a I l d I ..o-,tia m N --- I I _ z `~ I f v~z~ p I I Y ~. ~ I I o~d~ ma I1 m°'o °n t}- ~ I I ~} N~m Z II I I I I Z w U .' I I ~ i I o ~o~ I ~ I ~oN ~ = I ~ } w ~ I o t- ~ ~;. -' _~., 4 U ~ ~ww maw ~~m~ p w } ~ U ~aN w~ ~~~ ]ww ma4 ~}~ t- m ~- I I ~ w C1 I a O ~ I I ~ O j ~- z' l l M I ~ I ~' I I N I ~ II I o ~ ~ ~I I I o, F- I I II -; - ~ --_____i , I 103.0' I 0 L_ I° . W U 2 w w z w w V N 2 _U S ~ ~ Q W S C, Q U Q Z ~ O Q Nw J = W Z Q ~ ~ ~ M O U a ~N F- ~~~ ~7 aa~~ 0 ~ ~ m n aa,ooo ~}-a-- .' 1 ' ~' 1 ~ ~/ ~ f ~ ~ i_ _~ -~ .gip ~ i. ~ ~1 ~ E 1 _ I ~r ~~- _ . J `~~t . ` _ .. ~ '~ :: `..~_ G / C \\ ;. ice, i ~, ~ ~ ;~ 1 -off ,/~`~~ 1`,'~ ~ ~+ - ~ ~ \~ '-~ _-'~/tom ~ iy` ,~ .~ •~ ,! ~ ~~ . .. ,- - s ! ,~ f ~ {`G ate ~ ~ _~ .r~, ~ . ~~ _ _ _ ~~:-~ ~ . _ ''~i . .~x . _~ -ro ~ tL~ OV - "~+;: ~+ a ..< ~ ~.~.- ~~ ~~~~: . ,'x ~ '~~. _ } ~~b~c y.. ~ _ 1. ~ r Ft ' ac;!s ,a"~'~''~j.~~ Ems-' 'Cj~s ~j~ ./ _ _ - ,t ~Y .4 ~ ~, ti ~•J}y~~j- x ~/ ~ ~. D~ \ 9 , o ~ \i a G ~v - - _ ( M / _~ o Q ~ ~V lil l = ~0 ~ ~~ ' i .. . O ~. _ ~, ° ' ~ o ~ •„ ~ o~ t j ~ ~ .~ ~a r ` '~ .< _. ~ / % o t41~ ` ~ 1 ~ ` ~3 ~ ~ 4 \J Y% V o ~ i6 ~ CARTE C1K. crP`TC _ ,. CANTEr~ B RY HILLS C T. 4, \ --la rY'~ 1 OR C ~h () U Qft~ z CAV ~ `yrnnGw~,7 -90 9 I PARR • W RARD -to{ ~ ' .....~ ~~~.• . 9 e~" g~VO~ n ~ART~ 15 Ieu 1 _clr ~~i ~ L/ ~ VICINITY MAP;1 ~% -- _.~- ~ i+-a NORTH ~ '' ~ CS • I ~ - / / - f: I4 ~ ~ t y s' f r..i •I ~ 0 y . ~ ~y ~..,, ~ Ca • 0 / vflf ~ ` , ~` o ~ ~ ~!S.ua ° G ,_, . ~ 16 f.al ' ffoY fae+" P ~ ~ ~~ ` -~ ^^~~ _ \ , ~ 7b ~ 4 V /~~• ' ~ ' J an • `~ afiJ 450/ L3 G - ., . / l ,.. „~ ~ ~ f_ w.. N , s .>'.. - _ e -2 21 ~~,...~.,~ .,.,.,~,,. ., ~ _ _ _ 1.lTAe "emu , / j ..q e rr.. V / j n~a ~ ~ ..r• " ~ / i ~ Icsa•wa ~- ~ ~ i. {a / ~ 7 \+~ cart ~ n •/ 'n ~ n• v ~ ~ ~ ~Z I ... ~ ,,,, -a.,. -- ~ .g -- - ~ - • - . r:: 1 ~ R ~ ,.~ ~ e° • / . ~ , trot 4 ~ 1 ° LlsAe ~' ;i of fn>' - `•' f?-/ .• _ t i' L. 9 S s . ~ . ' ~ 3.66 Ae _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ •• •5~ 1~ : ~ 1 S ~1 . ~ ` " V ~ ~ '/ I O 3 Z . fail ~ as O d . %y,, a s,7 ~ '` s w C::-~ = ~ 6 ~ / - - C - Z•- G-1 G. _/ ~ s s 16 16.1 )D - : ~ aJe ro~ ffdT N S + ~.~ Rt. 68T~~ ~~ ~~ Cnl /a N// IP' ~ 4 (Onbl roY 4» 9. \ m f• + IfJ1 ff>b ` ' "" _ ~ ~ ~ ..+ loot j Cei 7•a•w.+Ca ` ~T"' / ~ t fnf ~- L P - Z , ~:... ~,.. 21 ri z2 ~ ~ r , ~ ~ k ~ _ ~ 8 . . ~ .,,, ~_~_ - / n••• ~v~ 1 . • '~ / 1 ~- 'r _ ~' ~ ~ DEPARZMEIV'r pg pI,~~NNIIv*G ~ ALLIANCE •PROPERT~i ES~ INC.' • AND ZONING •~ TAX # 86.08-1-1 • .+ .... . ,~ •-•••Y•=«: ~iease cnecx ~r enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPL~E. ~n ~ ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 ' conce t lan us v p p Application fee Application ;~~... Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer a Iication pp Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either e o net of the pro ry or a owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edo d nsentaTth weer. Alli n Propert~ Inc. Owner's Signature: ]3v ~ / _ • VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: REZONING OF THREE TRACTS ) OF LAND CONTAINING 0.91 OF AN ACRE,) 0.61 OF AN ACRE AND 0.43 OF AN ACRE) PETITION TO REZONE AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONIAL ) AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 687) AND ) BRAMBLETON AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 221)) BEARING TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ) 77.17-5-22, 86.08-1-2 ) AND 86.08-1-3 FROM C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH ) CONDITIONS, AND C-1 OFFICE ) DISTRICT, TO C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. Alliance Properties, Inc. has entered into agreements with August Realty Partners, Arthur T. Williams, `~''• III, Callie Reed Bowles and Richard L. Williams and Margaret B. Williams to purchase four adjacent parcels of land bearing Tax Identification Numbers 86.08-1-4, 77.17-5-22, 86.08-1-2 and 86.08-1-3 which are to be developed as the site of a Harris Teeter Supermarket and a Revco Drug Store. 2. The 3.86 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.01-1- 4) to be purchased from August Realty Partners is the site of the former Mick or Mack Store and the Revco Drug Store at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue and is zoned C-2 General Commercial District. The three parcels to be rezoned are located at the rear and side of this tract and woods.l2o~~s 6r H.~EGRC7VE. P.L.C. y-3 60463 - 2 - are to be combined with this tract for the proposed Harris u Teeter/Revco complex. 3. The 0.91 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 77.17-5- 22) to be purchased from Arthur T. Williams is unoccupied and is that portion of the 1.65 acre tract containing the Wilco station that is zoned C-2, with conditions. 4. The 0.61 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.08-1- 2) to be purchased from Richard L. Williams and Margaret B. Williams is the site of Day-Williams, Consulting Engineers, at 4919 Colonial Avenue, and is zoned C-1, Office District. 5. The 0.43 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.08-1- 3) to be purchased from Callie Reed Bowles is the site of the Janus Learning Center at 4929 Colonial Avenue and is zoned C- 1, Office District. 6. Pursuant to Section 30-1 et seq. of the Roanoke I Woods RoG~xs 6z I-L~1ZI.EGROVE. P.LC. County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the Petitioners request that the three parcels of property be rezoned from their current zoning to C-2 General Commercial District in order that these three parcels of property and the adjacent 3.86. acre tract, which is currently zoned C-2 General Commercial District, may be used for retail and commercial purposes as the site of a Harris Teeter Supermarket and a Revco Drug Store. The Petitioners further request that all of the parcels be considered as one project for the purpose of this petition to the end that all parcels will be zoned C-2, 60463 - 3 - General Commercial District and that the review of the ~...~ concept plan and the supmission, if any, of proffered conditions will apply to all parcels as one site. 7. The Petitioners believe that the rezoning will further the intent and the purpose of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan in that the combination of the parcels to be rezoned with the adjacent 3.86 acre tract will allow the combined parcels to be used for the same purpose for which the 3.86 acre parcel has been used, will cause the existing vacant Mick or Mack building and the Revco Drug Store to be replaced with modern, state of the art facilities, will result in an increase in the real estate tax base of Roanoke County, provide additional jobs for the citizens of the County, conform to existing commercial uses in the area, serve the growing residential community in the adjacent area and along Route 221 and allow the development of the proposed Harris Teeter/Revco complex to be accomplished in a practical, efficient and well planned manner. 8. The proposed rezoning for the Harris Teeter/Revco I WOODS. ROGE[t5 6z HAZIPGRO'VE. P.L.C. complex conforms with the guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan in that it proposes a use of the property contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and enhances the existing commercial property at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue. The. rezoning will cause the intersection to be restructured in compliance with IF26a463 I ~,~._...~ , - 4 - an improved site plan, will improve the appearance of and access to the property and cause vacant, unused and unattractive property to be replaced by attractive, state of the art commercial facilities. The design of the complex will also shield adjacent property from commercial activity along Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue and improve traffic flow in the area. 9. The proposed complex will have a no negative impact on the adjoining properties and will provide grocery and drug store facilities for the surrounding neighborhood and the residents in developed areas along Route 221, an amenity which has been unavailable since Mick or Mack closed. The development will also cause the adjacent Wilco property to be improved by an exchange of real estate to correct the alignment of the Wilco property and the Harris Teeter/Revco site. The rezoning will also cause a portion of the Wilco site, which had been intended for mini warehouses, an industrial use, to become a portion of the Harris Teeter/Revco complex, a use which is more in keeping with the area. The site will be buffered by the natural terrain and C-1 Zoning along Colonial Avenue and will have improved traffic circulation by the alignment and control of access points through site plan review. Adequate water, sewer and road access are available to the site and public service in 60463 5 ~~ addition to that already provided to the site will not be ~ required. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Properties, Inc. August Realty Partners Arthur T. Williams, III Callie Reed Bowles Richard L. Williams Mar et B. Williams 2~ --_ Of Counsel James F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 I Woos, Rc~c~xs 6z H.~ZLEGRCNE, P.L.C. 260463 k 7 j ~l:L• w .~'; w~i °v vq. ..~ 2:i~ i~3 j• 36i3S 1;•.I 2 N ~ N !r ~ g i ~ j ti ~: 1 Z a.. ~a 1~ t} ~ ~ J y m oe ~ - _ F,. ~~•_ ~"y -~#:~'-' { z' isiz~ta a ~ ~ a H V ~#i t ! R ff S i #'~ 'i;E ~ : ~' IY ~:~1(~~{1 i~ ed~~~zst~ ~ # a ails nze ~i~ d # i ? !$F Ste:F_ ? ~•~:i ::E~si#:t L1 8:a4.2:;isi~ d ,~ ~ i ~ cn s Q !a: ~anuany loluolo~~ L89 a.~o~ Y ~~_ P`1 ~ ~~; ~- Y ~d moo ~l`C air: ct`•:~j --_ _80• .0'01 ~. ~'^ ~2 C~~~ j e°~ 4F~#.Y _ _ tti °o •O~B ~ dU ~ O O u~ I i a 5° ~a~m >-~ i 2 ~ .. N OHO 8 ~ o~ -IL I L ~~ ~6Q I ~ I -~ _ .~ o Y {'mss€.'i ~Y~ ~ I I I W I ~ N ~~ ' So. c gi~~:il (I ~ v I I N C~a I _ I o~ o L e ~ ~!L U ~. ~gW ~ i _ I I ~ ~ ¢a ~ _ J 81 ~ ~ 3 ~' pl Yf U I ~¢ ~ ~ i ~y.nm O I //Y \ P ~~~ o I $ I I ~ ~ o ~aa I `~ ' // ~ .0'09 1 I I oQ I ~~ ~~„~ I ~- ~,; I g y~'s II . 0 31OI ~~ I CI`/ r ~m~ I O I 3 ~ rp^ // O I y ~ II j N ~e: tOJ.O' ~ ~ / s:~ (~ ,ec se / ~ / ~~ Wa gc W ffi~ ~~ O /I ``\\ / o.~ _~ I a n N I 3~, 0. / ~ / ~ NYm ip< I I N •yf5~~ f, 4 ~Up~~~ `Ql \\ / Jury / V U I ~: / ~ / ~ I ~ d / /~ 9 Q I W a,, '/ , / /// ~` W ~ Q I o • ¢ 3~7 • ~ // / / as ~ I `/ eu e: ~\: ~~~m~ / // ~ W~ ''W , ' e ~ ~ I H^^m^ // ~uW ==m tyro n~ n / ~ x ~ ~ m ~ // / ~jL~ °aa~ \/ =~aom / /~ ~~ g~U I ° `~° .Y.`"~ .~ / j / /pJ ~;.. / 01mo ~ , ~ ~ ~ / / ///^C aaom ~ ~ ~ ~ / // / ~J p !I ~ ~/i / ///// "'~ I \\\\ ~ / / o! ~,I ~\\ 1, / / / N~ el ~ 'o~i ~ / //// / i / / / W~ z % / // / mJ e i 4 z // ///% // ion ~ Or % / / // i N tea„ % //~/ VW o:~^~n ~ / o~mn n I %/ ~ %//// $ a.o~ ~ % / / / / ? m ~ // // / N ~ I i / I %/ n o % u n I % I i I `/ C I.} •3 .~ :;, = 1 ~ ~ti ;~ ~ti. ;. L,a«}~... ~,e.. ~f'~ ": .- i .-r- . ~~ ;, y ~ a ~{i ~ E •~ c~ ~ 1 r f~ ~ V ~ ~' tip. / C;.s , ~ , ~' ~lo •v .:T', ~~ may;-.+~ .. +1 .` _ ~ Lit. ~ nth Vs ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ R~ ? ~ ~ P ~ a Y i ~ 7s ~w _ i ,,,~ . „ ~ ~{• i ~ 1. I ` ~ O `l O tV y O - ~~-.a. ~ ~•1 _ ' ~ ~ ~ S I ~a ti `~ ~ Y -' 1~ • ~T ? ~~~ F ; x _ i ~ .:,;4 ~ ~ L ~ ,, 'j i ;_`'-~ - i~ y'~• ._ ~•4~..' ":+~ :Y ~. LL3 ~ `. '`- _ i . ~ ,, 3t / ! '~ „ 't ' ~ ~O. ter-.. ~~ i'~ ~ _, ~`' 1^~ _ ~ r"_'_ ~:- ,~'P \~Z 1 ,n mot.- '" / ~~9 \.~~ ~ / 1 l ~ I ' ~ ~ of ', ._~ ! / ~ fi ~. _ _ ._ ~i ~• 1` v 1 ~ - ~\ _ ~ D _ C' ~;,..~ c ,may , `` Z ~ q ~, ~?~ _ < ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~;~ ~ ~ o " _ _g~ a ' \\ ~ . _/ .mac /~ `, _ o ~ / ~ \ j . ~. d, ~\ - N l9 ~ - 1 ~ t0 11 ~t? _ i ~ .ti ~ ~ / _ _ ~_ ~ .:. ~?i ~ - ~ ~~ "~ ~, ~,~3rl~+i ,~~~~' ~ ,'^ s. i,• t 4 w ~.i'+ ~ i;...~ ~ e':i ~ + ~~'-~. {~°4 _ L ~ -.YXo._ .~'~..~ ~~r~'1'-v.. ~ :.A ~~. _ ..ice .~e*. ~_ ~.~'." ~ ?~ ~ r :. ~r ~ i _:.._ r a 'e.'K~...T _ _ 1 . ~.K:.n, ` rat. . i%'. ~ ~..f ~~ .~,.,• 0 N-3 NORTH • ~~lt ,` h v, s• ~ ~ 1 ~ (~ '~ ~ ~S' ti ~`.~~: ~ . 3 Gon,. ~` 4.26 Ac ~ °~ ' ASS V¢ ' , _ ~ x 1 `/ Rro,rDteton Comrrons _ S / ' Sep Map 8fi08 Inaeri iY ~~~ / 1•• 30' O ~ A I C ~~ nu ~ R 3 ~ :~, • Y / F ~^ _ _ 7 I h ~1~~ gat / c ~1rs 7 6 13 O C .~ . 12 , ~ g9 ``.,• ~ 2.23ae ~ 1 , _~ O ;: r ~ V •'t V yO IO „h ~ c ~, ....t ,; r.~ a o'.. , ... a ty ~. a r: ~ 8 /v ~'~ ,li i. ~~~~ .7 ~ r 7~0,'O`y N / ,, •~,,, vq, ~SY ` t 24 tc ~~. ~ • o` a ,, 960 2 / / h .._~ W .'-.6D' __.. _. ___.. . Coton,al~3 .- ~---._ :_ ~ .sss 7 ~ ~ ~i _ 1 ~szo,(~ ,~: lOC~ C9~ e:reaex C¢ ~ ~ t ties: C/~c ' 21 22 1 - 1.T.~ u36c J ~ 20 ~ / .`~h ~ ' .. i Or / ' ~' le 6 12 09 ~ 2s +~ ., t3 -.. I7 °t t0 "" 4 ° .;1 ,- r ~ 16 =~ ~ ~ ..\ - ~~ ~ `/ ~o.r' _,w_-~1_!~~•''_. _.' 'iii+~f ~~n .I ~` * DEpARZMEN•r pg .pLANNIA~ ALLIANCE PROPERTIES I N C •: ,_~.: ~- ' AND ZONING TAX # 86.08-t-2; -3; 77:17-5-22 .: ., , ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Industrial Development Authority Four-year unexpired term of Wayne Dunman who has resigned. His term will expire September 26, 1995. The Catawba Magisterial District is not currently represented on the IDA. At the February 28, 1995 Board Meeting, Supervisor Kohinke advised that he expects to appoint a citizen from the Catawba District at this meeting. SUBMITTED BY: !~' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke T° ( ) Minnix Nickens ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION 32895-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 28, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to the Jail Medical Account. 2. Request for Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request for Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Donation of Waterline Easement and a 15-foot Sanitary Sewer Easement on a 1.927 Acre Parcel from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation to the Board of Supervisors. 5. Appropriation of Litter Control Grant to Clean Valley Council. 6. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kings Chase, Section 2. 7. Request from the School Board requesting Appropriations to the School Grant Fund as follows: a. $800 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts for Multicultural Performance by J. Plunky Branch. b. $1,500 From the Virginia Commission of the r Arts for Performances by Virginia Opera. c. $4,858 in the Artists-in-Education Residency Program. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit from North Cross School 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gerald Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent J 1 'p t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLIITION 32895-4.8 AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE INMATE MEDICAL CO-PAYMENT PROGRAM TO THE JAIL MEDICAL CO-ACCOUNT WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Office has experienced a substantial increase in medical costs for jail inmates, and WHEREAS, they have established an Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to collect a portion of these costs from the inmate based on his or her ability to pay, and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the program will collect approximately $3,000 in fees on an annual basis, and WHEREAS, these fees should be appropriated to the Jail Medical Account to help offset the medical costs for jail inmates. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia authorizes that the medical fees collected from jail inmates be appropriated periodically, but not less than annually, to the Jail Medical Account and that this transfer be reflected in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gerald Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to the Jail Medical Account COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. Actual dollar amount collected. may not seem significant, but the real advantage is probably in the avoidance of future costs because inmates will not abuse the medical service if they have to pay part of the cost. BACKGROUND: At the March 14 Board meeting, Sheriff Gerald Holt advised that the Sheriff's Office has experienced a substantial increase in medical costs for inmates. To reduce the financial burden, they developed an Inmate Medical Co-Payment Program which collects a portion of the medical costs from the inmate based on his or her ability to pay. Sheriff Holt requested that those fees be appropriated to the Jail Medical Account. The request was approved by the Board of Supervisors, but they requested that a resolution detailing the action be brought back to the March 28 meeting. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Sheriff Holt estimates that based on fees collected in February of $240, approximately $3,000 will be collected on a yearly basis. He advised that this amount may decrease in future years as the inmates become aware that they will be expected to pay a portion of their medical costs and elect not to receive treatment. The Finance Department advised that they will appropriate the funds collected to the Jail Medical Account periodically, but not less than annually. The transfer will be reflected in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). FISCAL IMPACT• It is estimated that the fees collected will total $3,000 annually and may decrease in future years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the fees collected from jail inmates for medical care be appropriated to the Jail Medical Account periodically but not less than on an annual basis, and that the ~ - ~,_. G... "' transfer be reflected in the CAFR. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Nickens •- _ r . ,~ ~ ~_~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE INMATE MEDICAL CO-PAYMENT PROGRAM TO THE JAIL MEDICAL CO- ACCOUNT WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Office has experienced a substantial increase in medical costs for jail inmates, and WHEREAS, they have established an Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to collect a portion of these costs from the inmate based on his or her ability to pay, and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the program will collect approximately $3,000 in fees on an annual basis, and WHEREAS, these fees should be appropriated to the Jail Medical Account to help offset the medical costs for jail inmates. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia authorizes that the medical fees collected from jail inmates be appropriated periodically, but not less than annually, to the Jail Medical Account and that this transfer be reflected in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. ~r The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLIITION 32895-4.b REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST ACRE TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None ATTEST: ~! Q.,C..,~,L.~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ~ o '~ U ~I C d L U IQ Q u'1 O~ n M m E 2 c m Z ~ O ^ ~ ~ D H ~ Q P~1 Q ~ n ~ a ~ ~ W ~ U ~ ~ `o ~ H W ~ O ~1 _T ro c .N Y O ~ E CaC U C IG Z M >_ N ~ D ~ O a v, > ~ i ~ v o a w ~ ~ J Q1 l11 v ~ O U f 3 H Z ~ C _O ~ _ f 3 '~ Q ~ O a m ~ ui m ti ~ ti ~ a ui m a ui a ui d H a a d H .~ W u'1 ~O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j c ~ p p pp ~ ~ p O O O O O ~ ~ 2 6 rn A ~ ~ V O O O M ~ n ~ b N ro (n ' N N ~ YI O qm~ O N D m O N O N ~ ~Np O U c E-+ a a a a a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~' ~ ~ Q Q IL Q Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ O ~ ~ ` ~ ~ O Q ~ O p V IL H d LL F- d LL F- d lL F d IL F- d Il f- d LL W d d a `o U ~ ~ ~ H v ~ H C~ 3 m U] LY-i W H Z R' O c ~ W ~ Z .- N t7 V 1(I fD n N Z z d W i LL d z 0 r U LL F d W U 4 /o~ ti ~ ~ ~~~ 42 39 3026 ` DO 4 C Ac 4.60 Ac. , u Q~ Io ~ 40 Jots 'I` 2.09 Ac / >' \ -"~ 41 7 \ i \l 1.78 Ac \_l/ I.50 Ac ~ 2969 10 ? 2933 2 , ~ LOSAC `~ l ii~c r d` 9 ?~ ?9J7 3 ._ y 1 04 Ac u I ly Ar, d ____._.----j . B ? 292f 4 a n I.OG AC y 114 F C p ~~ .~ '~ ? W -~- • 100 ac ¢9os 5 125 A~ g ?90 103 oc PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) An extension of Forest Acre Trail (Virginia Route 700) 0.15 miles south to a tee turnaround. LENGTH: (1) 0.15 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 26 FEET SERVICE : (1) 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & ACCCEPTANCE OF FOREST ACRE TRAIL.INTO THE VIRGINIA INSPECTIONS DEPART~~~MENT OF TRANSPORTATION • SECONDARY SYSTEM . ~. r. ITEM NUMBER ~ '"t' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: RTF Development, the developer of Forest Acres, Section I, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept .15 mile of Forest Acre Trail. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS• The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Periwinkle Lane into the Secondary Road System. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~ . Arnold Covey, Direc or Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & In pections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens The Board of Bupervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST ACRE TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: Vote A Copy Teste: By: Mary Allen, Board Clerk ~-J L.. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLUTION 32895-4.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF PERIWINKLE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None ATTEST: ~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation • ~ i C d t U (~ Q 3 s 2 O ~; `ri H ~ N ~~ ~ M C 0 ~ v a N _ d ~ t E " 2 0 % W+ C N m t ~ O ~ ,Q ~ Q a W Q ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ a , ~ a ~W"' ~ N O a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ a ;, ~ m O ~ y~l N ~ ~ Z O ~ o E y 0 U ~ Q < Z M >_ N ~ 0 Q v; > ~ O o w ~~ J Q1 ~ < U N O F z m H f 3 ~ Q ~ o rn ui ui ui ui ui ui ui o~ a rn a a d w a rn ~ o, a a d ai ro C N .~ v v `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 ~ $ O n ~ ~ y A ~ y N ° ~ € < _ d N ~ ~ z ai I M a W G-l m am ui m ui ui ai d I ~ ^ o O o ~ L~ c ~ ~+ ~i ~ ~i 8i ~ N c U a a a a a a a itl s ~7 N UU N ~ U Gl UU N U d N Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q Q Q Q ~ a Q N 7 ~°- ~ r°- a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ° ~ a ~ ° ~ a ` N a r - f - u . d z 3 a ° W t i~ ~ $ H 3 F p a ~ & W ro a 2 Z ~ N M < ~ 0 n O Z O z _°y I F a O a m U '~ W ~j a h W ' U c O r< L-3 F f ~J ..\ 3a 1 i xvc f4~ .~-~ 3400 -_ Ji.. ~ 340- 4' 38 i.s6~a~ \\ _. ., PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Periwinkle Lane from the intersection of Sterling Road (Rt. 663) to cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) 0.19 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET SERVICE: (1) 8 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF PERIWINKLE LANE INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENTSECONDARY SYSTEM. >' ~.' :% I ,~ .. ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Parkway Meadows, a Virginia General Partnership, the developer of Parkway Meadows, Section II, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.19 mile of Periwinkle Lane. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS• The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Periwinkle Lane into the Secondary Road System. Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix S ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: l ~ __ ~f.~.rx~^~ ~~~ A no d Covey; Direc or Elmer C. Ho ge of Engineering & In pections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Nickens ~ J ~'~ The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in regular meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995, adopted the following: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF PERIWINKLE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, resolution be forwarded to the Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: that a certified copy of this Resident Engineer for the Virginia A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk ~' A-32895-4.d ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of waterline easement and a 15-foot sanitary sewer easement on a 1.927-acre parcel from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for waterline and sanitary sewer purposes, in connection with the development of a medical facility on a 1.927-acre parcel of land, located at the intersection of U. S. Route 460 and Huntridge Road, in the Vinton Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, fifteen feet (15' ) in width, and a waterline easement of variable width, from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation, a Virginia corporation, (Deed Book 1364, page 15; Tax Map No. 40.14-1-3) as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, dated February 7, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these easements. Respectfully submitted, V ckie L. Huff n Assistant County Attorney w~ -y Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Kohinke to abprove cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x Attorney & Inspections .. . euavE rA'' D = 96°zf'oo" A 25. ao' T e 2 7.94' A - 4 2.04' CHD• = 9226 eat = Ne9.39'2o'~W ExlST• fl'GRAi s. P,rvEn pRrv6 h a TAx •40.14- /-So ~ ~NUNloj SEC./ ~ ~ OGE ' ' ?~ /OAFgE ofNT!' I v, ~ tUPEayIlOR9 ~1 $~ o ~i /7.8,1272 Pie/ i~w~ W ~~ G~~o~ q'~~ ~~ p0 ~ ~~ Jat¢\~G Q G 4 ~~~\~,pe • ~ A Q rJk 7f' ~ " ' fir ItoN PIN I~' SAN.SIWeACA![MENT ~ Ex1lF ex?s?n.~r- ~~ ~ . "-~ rax'40:14-F-z I I ~ '~- l F 6 W COMMUNI(y (1EVfGOPMENT ~ ' ' ~ CORP. ~ ~ a lANlT~1RY ``rr r5 = ;~ ~ ~ n•e, 9G~ PG.lZB ~ ~ 4/ 8Af8MEN a~ l6Wa N ~ TD 9E 4MNreq ' s ~ $ `~ ~~ ~` lv ~' N ,~ r0 rH6 couwrr ~ ~ DP ,fDAN0i46 ~ v ~ ~, SET /aan PrN f z I. q ZT A~. ~ Q ; o ~ ~ ? z ~ ~ _ ~ SET IRON P/N ~We ~~- ~ F ~` m :s- IRON ~ uQi u'`, /g4.30' IRDx PiM 200.48 • TO AOANOKE .•A,• - ~ ~4r11'ro"W -- ! a7'49~oo"w ~0 E6AANTE7EMENT ~NQZ~&NGER THE GOUNTY DP ROANOHE V 5 ~OV T NOTES: 1) THIS PLAT IS BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 2) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH EFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. 3) THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE HAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. FLOOD ZONE "C". COHHi1NITY PANEL 11510190 OOSOA LEGAL REFERENCE: D.H. 1126, PAGE 470 p.B. 1363, PAGE 877 D.B. 1363, PAGE 882 (ESMT) PLAT SHOWING WATERLfNE EASEMENT 8 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY LEWIS-GALE BUILDING CORPORATION SITUATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. RTE. #460 & HUNTRIDGE ROAD VINTON MAGSSTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOICE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SC~~e: I'• G 100' o~T[. 7 FEBRUARY 1995 LUMSDEH ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURV ETOR&PL.hNNEAS ROANOKl, YIROINIA y y~6•~~. ~?~?~ ''ate Ex.YTJOT BA00' SET /RaN PIN MON. ~ ..-94Z'01'00'W (No~•Oo Scatt J' AVENUE ,~bQ ~R~W VARIES LJ~ ----•--- conu~. +~11-490 l4 r A-32895-4.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L'- 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Litter Control Grant to Clean Valley Council COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ynry~ ~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As the coordinating agency, Clean Valley Council applied for a litter control grant of $5,537.00 and a supplemental litter control grant of $3,557.00 on behalf of Roanoke County. These grants have been received by Roanoke County in the total amount of $9,094.00 and now need to be appropriated to the Clean Valley Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The grant funds of $9,094.00 have been received by Roanoke County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. m:\finance\common\board\ March 21. 1995 r L~ Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approv d by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Kohinke to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance m:\finance\common\board\ March 21, 1995 A-32895-4.f ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kings Chase, Section 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~, ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Kings Chase, Section 2, Fralin and Waldron, Inc, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, PC entitled Kings Chase, Section 2, and on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $58,200 and $ 111,200 respectively. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Kings Chase, Section 2 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. e L-~- SUBMITTED BY• Gary Rob rtson, P.E. Utility irector APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward No Yes Abs Denied ( ) G. Kohinke to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITIES SERVING KING'S CHASE, SECTION 2 DEPARTMENT ~~P DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 6th day of March, 1995, by and between: Fralin and Waldron, Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit As shown on the plan entitled Kings Chase - Sec 2, made by Lumsden Associates, PC and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 L-l, The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer By: As. State of: County/~ iTl-~o ~r-~ron~i ran .-700.-7 By. to wit: ledged before me this: n~- . ; ,~.-. 19 9~ Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of ~ t.CJ ~~J . ~ ,. _. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 2 of 3 L.-~- Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City of: By to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Revised 02/10/95 Page 3 of 3 County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia Elmer C. Hodge A-32895-4.g ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ,/ ~' " '~-' MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the 1994-95 School Grant Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~%~~~ ~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County School Board has received the following grants: 1. The Virginia Commission for the Arts has awarded the school division $800 to help defray expenses involved in performances by J. Plunky Branch to Roanoke County juniors. J. Plunky Branch is an African-American group which combines music and art to highlight black history and demonstrate African- American contributions. The group is highly recognized for its artistic abilities. 2. The Virginia Commission for the Arts has also awarded the school division $1,500 to defray the cost of eight performances of "Little Red Riding Hood" and one performance of "Music Ala Carte" by Virginia Opera for Roanoke County students. 3. The Virginia Department of Education has awarded the school division $4,858 for the Artists-in-Education Residency Program (Pre K-12) category to provide students and teachers in all secondary schools with a professional writer who will enhance the teaching and learning of creative writing. FISCAL IMPACT: None. An additional $900 will be required for the J. Plunky Branch performances. This amount is included in the current year's school budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $7,158 to the 1994-95 School Grant Fund. ~~~ Garland R. Life Elmer C. Hodge Senior Director of Instruction County Administrator -2- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Kohinke to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools R ~~r.1 a~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON MARCH 9, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION OF $800 TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND. WHEREAS, the Virginia Commission for the Arts has awarded the County School Board of Roanoke County an $800 grant, and WHEREAS, these funds will assist in paying for a multicultural performance to Roanoke County juniors by J. Plunky Branch, an African-American group which combines music and art to highlight black history and demonstrate African-American contributions; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded, requests an appropriation of $800 by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the School Grant Fund. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomas A. Leggette TES Cp Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge L-~.b FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON MARCH 23, ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, VIRGINIA OF ROANOKE COUNTY 1995 IN THE BOARD ROANOKE COUNTY, RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR PERFORMANCES BY VIRGINIA OPERA WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has received a grant award of $1,500 from the Virginia Commission of Arts to defray the cost of eight performances of "Little Red Riding Hood and one performance of "Music Ala Carte" by Virginia Opera for Roanoke County students; BE IT RESOLVED that said school board requests an appropriation by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in the amount of $1,500 to the School Grant Fund. Adopted on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded, and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ~.~. ~ ~~~-- C 1 erk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge ,~ L- ~, ~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON MARCH 23, ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, VIRGINIA. OF ROANOKE COUNTY 1995 IN THE BOARD ROANOKE COUNTY, RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR THE ARTISTS-IN-EDUCATION RESIDENCY PROGRAM (PRE K-12) WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has received a grant of $4,858.00 in the Artists-in-Education Residency Program (Pre K-12) category, and WHEREAS, the funding will provide students and teachers in all secondary schools with a professional writer who will enhance the teaching and learning of creative writing, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said school board requests an appropriation of $4,858.00 by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the School Grant Fund. Adopted on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded, and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ,...~- `~'' Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge A-32895-4.h ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from North Cross School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: North Cross School has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on May 13, 1995. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the North Cross School be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ . Q ,,~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Kohinke to apt~rove Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sea• of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization North Cr_os School Mailing Address 4254 Colonial Ave SW City, state, Zip Code Roanoke VA 24018 When was the organization founded? 1961 Purpose and Type of Organization Private School Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YES X NO Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO Is the organization exempt under 5501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YE8 ~; NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. sect. of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? yES Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? yR,S COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONINIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 ~-Fl 1 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organization pursuant to $ 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Raffles ? YES L-~ DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Description Fair Market Valua 1-Tuition Scholarship $5,000 2-USAir tickets (2( to $2,812 anywhere in the United States DATE OF RAFFLE May 13, 1995 If this application is for an ANNUAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. Specific location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? NOTE: Th s permit shall be valid only for the above location. Any organisation holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5$) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. Schlarships and classroom supplies COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF TI-IE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a . gfficers of the Organization: President• John C. Parrott II Phone: Address• 3112 Somerset Street Roanoke VA 24014 Vice President: Robert N Fishburn Phone: Address: 3542 PPakwood DriTP Roanoke VA 24014 Secretary: Lucy R. Ellet Phone: Address: 3752 Lee Hwy Roanoke vA ~4n1R Treasurer: Bittle Porterfield III Phone: Address: 2436 Cornwallis Ave Roanoke VA 24014 Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name: G. William Stacey T_V Home Address 430 Willow Oak Drive Roanoke VA 24015 Phone Bus Phone (703) 989-6641 Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name: Joyce H Dickenson Home Address 1844 Maiden Lane Roanoke VA 24015 Phone Bus Phone (70~) 9g9-6641 Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? yES Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? YF~ IF ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 "'~ 3 NOTARIZATION THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN HY ALL APPLICANTB: I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in SiB.Z-434 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and [,,,. beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have read and understand the attached copies of Bea. 18.2-340.1 ets sect. of the Code of Virginia and 8eation 4-86 ~t ._ se of the Roanoke County Code. signed by: ~~~ cc.` ~ ~~'""" ~~ Mar aret D. Palmieri Business Mana er 6511 Dee wood Dr. RK, VA 24018 Name T tle Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this ~_day of Mare-~19~ in the County/City of Roanc~kP , Virginia. ~M. ~~ ~.~ My commission expires: ~~-~iT_i9~ Notary Publ c NOT VALID UNLESB COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~~'-fie o iss er of a Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 f~-/ i• • County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements February 28, 1995 Citizen Survey Designated for Dixie Caverns Balance at March 28, 1995 Amount $7,123,594 (40,000) (10,000) (92,000) (12,600) (2,250,000) $4,718,994 Submitted By of General Fund Expenditures 3% . °o Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). m:finance\common\board\genera1.95 March 20, 1995 County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $ 29,835.86 Submittedy by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance • m:\finance\common\board\capita1.95 ~~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget $90,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill (50,000) August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road (10,000) September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway (1,000) October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan (20,000) January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study (3,000) February 28, 1995 County Code Supplement (4,227) Balance as of March 28, 1995 $1,773 Submitted by ~~~ ~. ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance m:\finance\common\board\continge.95 d_y mutt#g of ~nr~nu~e ~r t.~ R h DECLARING SATURDAY, MARCH 18, 1995 AS NATIONAL QUILTERS DAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the art of quilt making has been passed from generatfon to generatfon through the World, the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Virginia through family and friends sharing their expertise of the art and especially In Roanoke Countyy through the Star Quitters Guild; and WHEREAS, the qullters establish a framework wffhin which experienced and beginning qullters may learn from one another, sharing techniques and quilting advances; and WHEREAS, the qullters foster wlfhin the community an awareness of quilting as both a historical and a living creative contribution to our Lives as a community; and WHEREAS, the qullters make significant contributions to the community, organizations, and individuals by sharing their art for viewing, adornment, or warmth; and WHEREAS, the qullters are peecemakers in their art and peacemakers in their communities. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim Saturday, March 18, 1995, as NATIONAL QUILTFRS DAY in Roanoke County, Virginia, and call its significance to the attention of all of our citizens. ~~ K .Odell "Fuzzy" i nix, Chairman ATTEST: Mary H. Allen, Clerk ,~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) , a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment C) . FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chamblis Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens ~{ 6-5 BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A March 28, 1995 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS DRAINAGE PROJECTS -SIERRA DRIVE/FENWICK DRIVE The early warning system is on line and the job is complete. DRAINAGE PROJECTS -GREEN VALLEY The project is complete. VDOT will reimburse 50% of the project, including staff time. DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK Phase I of the project is complete. Phase II will involve minor silt removal from downstream of the Route 311 bridge. We expect to remove the remaining silt when weather permits. DRAINAGE PROJECTS - WOLFE CREEK Plans are complete for this project. We are discussing the plans with VDOT and staff. VALLEY TECHPARK The project is 100% complete. VDOT will provide project cost figures within the next 30-60 days. PARKS AND RECREATION Whispering Pines Park - Ballfield lights have been inspected and approved. Basketball goals have been erected on the courts with fencing and striping installation scheduled for early spring. Goode Park (Stonebridge) -The sewer is in. Garst Mill Park -The ISTEA Grant was submitted to VDOT on January 30, 1995. A decision on the grant will not be made until late June. The playground is complete. PURCHASE OF LAND FOR HIGH SCHOOL Additional survey work is underway at this time. A O O M O~tOM ~ O O ~ ~pO~ ,~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~~ N zbQ o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o '~ U ~ ~ W 'o a F W C/1 0 U d W zA d d U A ~ ~ .~ '~` ..i ap "C bA W H O~ Q ~ ~ a O N A ~ ,~ O~~ P~ ~ ~ a ti z ., Q °` a d Q w w z ti w A 0 z F 0 w d w c7 A O w w z a d w z a d w z a d w z a d w z a d w z a d w z a d Q H Q F Q H Q F Q F ~ F Q H a U d ,.a a U d ,~ a U d ,.a a U d ,~ a U d ,~ a U d ,~ a U d H ~ H az ~ F ~H~ a Q~ rx F Ha a ~~ w a X 0 0 Q A d ~ O O a' ~ O a~ O L4 U A d W d U U v~ U P. U F ~' Q ..., .~ a ~: 0 U ~° ~: .~ c~ 0 .~ b 0 0 .., .~ .~ .~ 0 bn a~ 0 a~ U O C1. ~ ~ y 't3 ~ ~ H U O ~ ~ O O O ~ `p 64 O U i.; N z 0 U Q~ 0 'd it O O U U N O a W H A F U O~ a ~ z~ ~Q N ~ 'b Q ~o ~. 'C F'r W a~ N ,L cd .~ ti .~ ~" °~ a Q rn d w w ., w Q ~ O z H 0 ~, w w Q m A ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ d d d a d a a a z w o °'z ~ ~ F a d U d Q ~ U ~ W a~ a~ 0 U ,~ 0 .,__, a~ a~ 0 ... a~ .~ c~ 3 ~. a~ H z U N ~~ } O O ~ ~pv'~O O r"+~M i-: ~ U ~ ~~ ~/r ~ ~ A 0 0 ~ U v~ U ~ O U ~ ~' 'o W ~. a W H A F+ O ~ ~ a ~~ A ~ .~ O~~ Q~ Q W r~ d z WW A4 L7 i F O A4 a W U" A ., z ., ~, a °~ a rn Q W W w z Q ., U W Q ~ ~ O z ........ . ....... F 0 ~, w w Q a1 ] ~ ~ ~ z ~ z Q E' z d F" z d F" z Q F" Q F" a Q a`~, ¢ a d a Q a d p O O x x A h~ U U F ~ W wH ~ H ~z H z .a H Q ¢ O O O ~ U ~ 'd .~ .-.~ .~ Fi •d a~ 0 U S"'., ,~ ~-.+ O U U O ~, a O O v~ .~ ~. .~ 3 H Q a~ a~ a 0 U .., U N O ~, a~ a~ ~ .~ E-~ W M Q- 5 ~ooo ~ooo ,~ov~o o''+~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q z~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ U ~ W U ~O t, a W H A H ~ ~ a ~ N A ~ ~ z ~ Q W U z 0 H U O a A a ti z ti °~ a Q ~ ~ W w ., W A 0 z ~ F U O ........ ........ ~, W a w ca o~ ~ ¢ H a ~ a d a'~, Q a d z o F x F _ ~" ~ N ~ Q wH ~ U O H O an -~ .~ M 0 0 a~ 0 'C O .-~ cd O ~, .~ 0 .., ~3 a~ ~' ~ a~ a~ o ~~ 3 o ,~ a3 ~: w bA o ~ .., ~ '~ a~ N O [~•~ O W a~ N U~ "" ~ooo ~ooo ~ p O N ~ 6g 69 .1~ N +~ ~ ~ '~ b~A Q aaz~ ° ~: ~~ ~ ~° U O ~ ~' o W U U N O a W A F o~°~ a ~~ z~~ c~ .~ ., z ., ~, ~ °~ a d rn d x w WU `~ L~ z ~ ti O w v~ Q H 0 O z a a ~ H W U O ^ ~ W A ~ ~ ¢ H w c~ A ro A a A ~ Q ~ A .a W .a A .a z ¢ z ¢ z Q z ¢ z a z a H H ~ H H H ,..~ U ¢ ,.a U ~ ,.a U ¢ ,~ U Q ,a U ¢ ,.a U a. ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a d a. ¢ H o Q W z o ~ ~ z ~ ~ H 3 ~ 3z Q~ ~ a w w~ ~°z^ W , ~ QH z ~ z ~, ~ ~U a 0~ ~O O O w H O A ... 3 a . ,..~ U ~_ a~ a~ ~," O U N c~ a z U ~~~ ~; ~~°A ~~o ~ ~+ ~ o ~, ~ ~ ~~~~ ~Zp~q ~ i-~ ~ o W ~ U ~, '~ 0 0 U U N O a a d x F-+ x G7 A U O a a W A W H A Ei 01 o"~°` a ~~ N Q +-+ c~i z ., z ., ¢ Q W w z ., U W Q 0 z °' U O a La ¢ N w Q ca Q A Q w A w a a a a a a Q a w a z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ ¢ F, ¢ F. ¢ E. ¢ F. ¢ F. ¢ F. ¢ E. ¢ E. a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~ a ~ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ > o ~., ~ O A W ~ a ~~ w ~ ~ F z ~ A ~ UW as ¢ H ~ W H W `~zA a' ¢ ~ ¢ W ] ~ w a0 z ¢O z O H O v iv i ¢ Q ~U ~ cd ,D b ~° a a~ ... 3 a~ z O U p-5 r ~ O O ~ ~pOQ `~ ~ O 69 ~ N ~ bq ~ .. ~., ~ 'C7 'b z~~ ~ o W Li U b ~ ~. 0 0 U U O a W H A h O ~ O~ a ~ N z~~ ~ d ~ a ., z ., '^ d d d w w w z d ., U W Q ~ ~ O z H U O rn a w H w c7 A w a w a w a Q a Q a Q a Q a z d H z d ~ z d ~ z d ~ z d H z d F z d H a ~ a a ~ Q a ~ Q a ~ ¢ a ~ a a ~ ¢ a ~ a d a d a d a d a d a d a d U ;, a z 0 z 0 vxi d Q z ~ Q a ~-. a d H a U H a ~"~ zw ~w ~ ~~~ d z ~H~ Q~H ~F-~ AvH ww~ a ~ ao ~z ~¢d ~ w W~o~ w Woz U H O vwiU a.w aka a' az wa U F a ~, a~ cd N ,sue a4 .., cd a~i i. t~ .., .~ cd Q ~. N Q W Q "°" ~N O O ~ ~ O G~ x,~~M ci ~ ,--~ a~~~ N O ~' C) o^' ~o~ ~~~° O ~ sue, U ~ a~i a o a .-~ W i, N z 0 F A N rn ~ ~ O ~ O~ a ~ N A ~ ~ z PQ ~ ti z ., °~ a H U w w a ti z o W ~ Q U ~ o W z N U O ~y ~ W a W t~ O v~ '"' c~ m v ~o Q m N N ~ ~ vi m ~ z ~ ~ a z z z Q F" d E' ~ F" Q F" a Q a ¢ a d a Q W ~ w z a a aQ z a ~ F ~ W W RS a Q '" ~' a z o~ ~ x Q H 3a ., ~ Q .~ .., 3 0 U ,s 0 b U N N a~ .~ 0 ..o as 0 a U N A. .,.., S-'.i ~~ ~' ~~ ,~ ~ .-r ~ ~ W 'b •.~r '-' .~ i-i ~ U ~ .~ o H a •~ ~~ x a ~ ~ '~ ~ a F p~ ... b '~ ,~ G ~ ~ a :~, O 'b U ~ ,~ t~._~O~ N O O ~ p O ~ x,~~M ao~~ o a~ o ^' own ~ b ;~ N ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O '~ sue. U o ~ .o ~ a ~. ~ a w z 0 U U F A H rn ~ ~ O~°~ aa"' ~ N z~~ cct F a a z 0 U .-1 ., z ., ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~~ a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~II w z ti U W A v O z a a w d S N N ~ S ~ ~ v~ T O v-~ O O ~ V ~ S V ~ ~O ~ O A M N ~ ~ N N ~ M z d a Q E• d z¢ d F. a Q z d a Q E. ¢ z d a a F. ~ z d a Q E" Q ~ ¢ az d .. d VO o F ., ~ ~~ ~ U Wo ~ w Z o C7 ~ cn h W F W F c~ .~, a~ b .~ .~ bo 0 0 .~ U Q 0 M cd c~ ti O H O Q 0 b .a 3 ri~i V W a~ FH r+4 [~ U ~ 'd ai~+ a o ~ ~ E-~ ~ a z~~, ~~~ ~ ~ U ti O~ w..x°S ~M~ f.wr . •• ,~ O ~O N O O ~p00~ x.~~M ~~~~; ~~'' N ~ sir ~. o ~ ai o~' ~~ b ~ ~ Q ;b~~ o O `" O ,..~ sue., U ~ 'o .° a, az w O U U F a a z 0 U A d x d a .a ., z ti ~, Q °~ a rn ~II w z ti U W A ~ O z II ~ II o w S ~ W S 8 [~ 8 M Fy V1 00 ~O W N l~ h O N N W O ~ N ~--~ ~--~ V M O l~ A W F A H rn Oparn ~+ ~ a ~~ N z~~ ~ ~ z ~ Q F a Q z Q a ~ F ¢ z Q a ~ F ¢ z ~ a ~ F A z w~ ~ (~ ~ > rx F H W~ U A~ W wz d zaa .a ~w a Boa o H W O ~ ..5 >,ooo a~c~oo >ooo UOO°°°o ~ ~~ o ~~~~ ~bQ o z ~ o :b o °~ i„i U p U .. U ~ ~ a~ ~ Gj 'o ~, a w F A a H rn O ~ a\ a ~ N 'Z ~ U ~d~ a ., z ~" w w z ~ d ., E~ ~7] U i' W ~/~ Ca W a > A ~ o ~ z O x 0 ~, W d W Q ~ ~ ~ ~ z z z z d F, d E. d E. d F. a ¢ a d a d a d W ~ A ti w ~' o ~ W Wa x ~u ~ti u ti F 0 d 3 ¢~° W ]~ oxo C4 F U Q ° ° o oz n n a a o > > U d d U d F F W O n.~ ~ o 00 ~ O O ~ Q'~'o~ ~ ~ ~ i.+ b4 69 .~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O z ~ Q (~ O :~ O U ~ 'b U ~ N ~ o W a W H A H O ~ °~ a ~ N A ~ .~ O~~ ~d~ a a U W F W a a .a ., z ., ~ ~ Q °~ a rn Q W w .~ w a ~ ~ 0 z H 0 w ~ :> a W A ca z ~ z F a d a Q ~ a z o A z o F W ~. a W E.F~ Q~z a ~ .a F ~~o 0 0 v~ 0 O M a~ ... .,-. a~ ~. b~A 0 U U N 'o ~. a a~ b .~ 0 a ~3 F-+ O Q a~ 0 U O O .--~ .... U N O ~. a H F W O U N .--~ ~ ~ 0 ~ .--i --~ Q ~ O N ~ ,~ ~ '~ i-~ 64 ~ .D ;,; 'b ~ ~ Gj z ~ Q .~ ~ ~ o ~ U ~~+ U ~ ~ a~ ~° a W 0 :b ~. O O U U N O ~.. a LW l^ A H 01 O pq o~ a ~ N A ~ ~ z ~~~ W Q x U x x a 0 ~1 A a w 0 W x U a ., ., ~" °~ a d a Q W w ., U W A 0 z ~ F O ~, W F W o r 0 N 0 r 0 N A W F Q ~ a ~ a Q w x ~ W F az H a a ~ cd a ~. ... ~, 0 3 .--i f~ •H ..~-i d E+ z O U M ~~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment C March 28, 1995 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights Sierra Drive/Fenwick Drive Green Valley Mason Creek Phase I PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Garst Mill Park Playground FIRE HYDRANTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY ~~ Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center -Replace Lights Mt. Pleasant Park Brambleton Center Elevator VALLEY TECHPARK ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~, ~~ ~ ~;~.~!~.~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the March 28, 1995 work session, staff will review several items relating to the development of the FY1995-96 budget: 1.) Maintenance Program Review 2.) CIP Project Review-General review of submitted projects. 3.) Contributions-Social Service, Human Service and Cultural Agencies. 4.) Salary and Employee Benefits Information on these topics have been provided for insertion into your FY1995-96 work session notebook. Respectfully submitted, • ~ t~ W. Brent Robert on Budget Manager Approv d by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received O Johnson _ _ Referred O Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens G-' Table of Contents 1. Calendar .............................................. 1-1 2. Summaries 3. Expenditures Mid-year Expenditure Summary ......................... 3-1 Significant Departmental Expenditure Requests ............. 3-4 Maintenance Work Programs .......................... 3-6 Contributions to Human Service Agencies ............... 3-9 Contributions to Social Service and Cultural Agencies .... 3-10 Dues and Per Capita Allocations ....................... 3-11 4. Revenues General Government Revenues--Update ................... 4-1 5. Funded Capital 6. Additional Funding Requests (Addbacks) 7. Personnel 8. School Budget 9. CIP Project Review by Department ......................... 9-1 10. Vehicle Inventory ......................................... 10-1 Public Safety ...:.................................... 10-2 General Administration ............................... 10-7 Vehicle Replacement Policy (Draft) ..................... 10-11 M:\FINANCE\BUDGET\WORKSES\TOC96. WPD ~E - 11. Debt Service Combined County and School Debt Service ............... 11-1 Analysis of School Debt Service ........................ 11-2 Analysis of County Debt Service ........................ 11-3 Spring 1995 VPSA Bond Sale .......................... 11-4 School Board--Authorized but Not Issued Loans ........... 11-5 12. Notes/Miscellaneous M:\FINANCE\BUDGET\WORKSES\TOC96. WPD i Maintenance Work Programs FY 1995-96 Submitted By General Services Courthouse Crack Repairs 8,000 Interior Painting 35,000 Carpet Replacement 12,000 Total 55,000 Fire Stations Exterior Firehouse Painting 5,000 Interior Firehouse Painting (11 Stations) 30,000 Mount Pleasant-Paving 23,000 Clearbrook-Paving 34,000 Catawba-Pavement Sealing 4,500 Catawba-Epoxy on aprons front/back 3340 Sqr ft 13,360 Mason Cove-Pavement Sealing 8,200 Fort Lewis-Pavement Sealing 6,400 Bent Mountain-Epoxy front/rear aprons 4515 Sqr ft 18,060 Bent Mountain-Paving 30,000 Cave Spring-Pavement Sealing 4,000 Hollins-Pavement Sealing 5,600 Cave Spring-Structural Damage 30,000 Cave Spring Roof 12,000 Asphalt Patch 2" in web area in several stations 6,000 Total 230,120 Public Safety Center Window Replacement/Upgrade 83,000 Pavement-Rear Parking Area 18,100 Interior Painting 4,000 Electrical Upgrades 5,000 Carpet and Tile Upgrades 16,000 Door Replacement 9,000 Public Safety Center-Roof Replacement 30,000 Total 165,100 Library Carpet Replacement-Headquarters 14,500 Vinton Library-Roof Replacement 24,000 Total 38,500 03/23/95 06:26 PM finance\budget\maint95.wk4 P - f 3-6 Maintenance Work Programs FY 1995-96 RCAC Window Upgrades 52,000 2 Sets of Double Doors Main Lobby 8,900 Tile Floors in Hallways and Breakroom 2nd Floor 6,000 Work Stations in Treasurer's Office 10,000 Electric Heaters in Hobby _ 4,000 Total 80,900 Public Service Center Utility Bay Area-Replaced Cracked Concrete 3,500 Rebuild Dock Area Retaining Wall 3,000 Replace Windows-K.M. Side and rear of Building 40,000 Install Three Overhead Thermacore Doors 5,000 Relocate Fence 14,000 Upgrade Bay Area Electrical 9,800 Replace P&R and Utility Office Carpet and Tile 22,000 Remodel Boiler Room Building 55,000 Build HVAC Roof Screens 1,800 Landscaping 3,000 Repaint Metal Portion of Building 8,000 Install Pipe Drainage for Front Downspouts 3,500 Remove Water Tank on Hill 2,500 Tar and Chip Parking Area near Fire Training Bld 4,800 Road Repairs 72,000 Drainage 10,000 Road for Leaf Site 27,000 Total 284,900 EPA Violation Abatement New Vehicle Washbays 156,000 Underground Storage Tank Removal&Replace 160,000 Total 316,000 Total General Service Maintenance $1,170,520 03/23/95 06:26 PM finance\budget\maint95.wk4 3-7 }~. I Maintenance Work Programs FY 1995-96 ubmitted By Parks and Recreation arks and Recreation Paving-Oak Grove 4,000 Paving-Gearhart 6,000 Paving-Hidden Valley 15,000 Renovation-Rest Rooms,Water Fountains, Shelters Stonebridge 25,000 Clearbrook 25,000 Willie Martin 5,000 Renovation-Fields-Grading, soils, and drainage. 20,000 Landscaping-Green Hill 5,000 Landscaping-Walrond 5,000 Landscaping-Vinyard 5,000 Landscaping-Shell/Merriman 5,000 Landscaping-Happy Hollow 5,000 Landscaping-Gearhart 5,000 Resurface/Stripe Basketball Courts Garst Mill 3,500 Willie Martin 3,500 Brookside 3,500 War Memorial 3,500 Stonebridge 3,500 Mt. View 3,500 Bent Mountain 3,500 Resurface/Stripe Tennis Courts Mount Pleasant 3,500 Bent Mountain 3,500 Gearhart 3,500 Total Parks and Recreation Maintenance $165,000 Total Maintenance Projects ~1..~.~~,5.2_Q 03/23/95 06:26 PM financelbudget\maint95.wk4 3-8 County of Roanoke Contributions to Human Service Agencies FY 1995-96 Budget 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Human Service Agency Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley $4,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) 5,000 10,000 10,000 78,905 10,000 Bethany Hall 0 500 500 2,600 500 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley 2,720 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Council of Community Services- Information and Referral Center 2,500 3,000 3,000 6,310 3,000 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley 2,500 3,000 3,000 4,000 3,000 Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,816 3,000 Bradley Free Clinic 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 League of Older Americans 10,000 12,500 12,500 18,216 12,500 Roanoke Area Ministries 1,333 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,000 The Salvation Army 0 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain 3,500 5,000 5,000 8,200 5,000 TRUST 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 5,500 Conflict Resolution Center 0 0 0 2,000 0 Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 0 5,000 16,660 25,000 16,660 4H Camp 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Literacy Volunteer Program 0 1,053 0 0 0 Roanoke Valley Speech & Heazing Center 0 500 500 1,000 500 Blue Ridge Regional Education and Training Council 0 0 0 3,387 0 Caze Coalition of Roanoke Valley 0 0 0 1,000 0 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) 0 0 1,053 5,000 1,053 Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council 0 0 0 2,500 0 Western VA EMS Council 0 0 0 16,732 0 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley 0 0 0 2,500 0 National Multiple Sclerosis Society 0 0 0 800 0 Total Contributions $45 553 $71 053 $82 713 $209 966 $82 213 m:\finance\budget\book-wk\HMSVC96.WK4 03/23/95 05:47 PM 3-9 t.~H County of Roanoke Contributions to Social Service and Cultural Agencies FY 1995-96 Budget 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Contributions Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed Health and Social Services: TAP $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $39,866 $25,000 TAP-Transitional Living Center 15,000 15,000 15,000 19,943 15,000 Blue Ridge Community Services 79,332 79,332 79,332 115,254 79,332 $119,332 $119,332 $119,332 $175,063 $119,332 Cultural Enrichment /Tourism: Vinton Dogwood Festival $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 Roanoke Symphony 2,500 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 Art Museum of Western Virginia 0 1,000 1,000 0 Center in the Squaze 15,000 20,000 30,000 75,000 30,000 Arts Council of the Blue Ridge 2,500 3,000 3,000 5,300 3,000 Transportation Museum 4,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Native American Festival 500 1,550 1,550 0 Science Museum: Operating 0 10,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 Capital 0 0 0 100,000 0 Julian Stanley Wise Museum 5,000 0 0 0 Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating 0 4,000 14,000 18,500 14,000 Capital 0 0 0 47,500 0 Roanoke Arts Commission Art Show 0 500 500 0 Roanoke Valley History Museum 0 6,450 6,450 6,350 6,350 Mill Mountain Theatre 0 8,500 8,500 15,000 8,500 Appalachian Railroad Heritage Partnership 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 Explore (The River Foundation) 0 100,000 100,000 150,000 100,000 Alonzo Stagg Bowl 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 $30,500 $173,000 $195,500 $465,150 $194,350 Other: Blue Ridge Small Business Center 0 0 0 5,000 2,000 League of Women Voters 275 275 275 275 275 VA Western Community College Scholazship Fund 5,585 5,433 5,433 5,274 5,274 Natural Science Center 0 0 0 7,250 7,250 Construction Student Activities Center 0 0 13,527 40,580 13,527 Site Development-Water Retention Facility and Parking Improvements 0 0 0 66,379 ??? Miss Virginia Pageant 500 500 500 500 500 Roanoke Valley Horse Show 0 0 0 0 6,360 6,208 19,735 125,258 28,826 Total Contributions $156 192 $298 540 $334 567 $765 471 $342 508 M:\finance\budget\book-wk\B-CONT96. WK4 03/23/95 05:55 PM 3-10 County of Roanoke Dues and Per Capita Allocations FY 1995-96 Budget 1992::-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Organization- Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed. National Association of Counties $ 1,032 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 Virginia Association of Counties 11,900 11,900 11,900 13,855 11,900 Vinton Chamber of Commerce 100 100 100 100 100 Saletn/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce 6,000 6,000 6,000 7,000 6,000 Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500 5,000 2,500 Virginia Municipal League 12,971 12,971 14,301 14,301 14,301 Blue Ridge Region 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 National Civic League 200 200 200 200 200 Fifth Planning District Commission 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,900 21,500 Economic Development Partnership 71,667 107,500 107,500 107,500 107,500 Convention and Visitors Bureau 35,000 79,332 107,500 250,000 107,500 Virginia Institute of Government 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 Virginia Amateur Sports 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 30,000 Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 First Union Training 0 75,000 75,000 0 0 Total $ 191 870 $ 352 560 $ 382 058 $ 465 913 $ 312 058 03/23/95 05:52 PM BUDGET\book-wk~B-DUES96.WK4 3-11 CQ in y O L. o a C ~ O y CO 0 ~ ~ iYi ,~ ~ i w ~ ~ e~ o as a a >+ °~ A cG`~~ U ca .a ~a U d °° w _~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a _~ ~, O O O O O O O O O U U U C7 C7 C7 C7 C~ C7 C7 C7 c~ a a a 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° a o o o o o o a .. °o ., °o .~ ion ion .°n v°~ '. >+ W a °~ o ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ° o o 0 0 " 0 0 0 " 0 o o a o n ~ o ~ o ° 0 o 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 w 0 ~ t m e n i 00 a~ 0 ~n 0 o 0 ~n 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ~ o ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 N 0 O 0 b 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 in 0 N N r . i y ..i .r h O1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O D\ O~ O O O O O O O O '+ O O O O O O O O .w O .-~ ~ a0 ~ ~..i .~ •~ M ..i .i M W a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O a p~ O O O O O O O O V! O V1 O O O O O O O O O ,~ N ~n N V7 O~ .-~ N .w ~ ~ N .~ .r ~p W O O O O N M O O O O O O N M L. C O O O t~ O O O l~ O 'O ~ O M N b O ~ . ~ ~ O~ 7 ~ O R ~ LTi .w t O O O O O Vi O O O O O ~n N M O O O O O O N M O O O O O O O O O O .yj .. O O R O O 7 [ ~ O O O I^ O O O O O v y O O O O V1 O O O ~n 7 ..r Q .-~ t~ M ~n ~n ~O ~O ~n ~D M N O O O V1 O V7 O ~n O ~n i- U N r N N r N ~ ~ 7 [ ~ bf N N N N D\ Qw N 40 .~+ M V7 O~ ~d '` U U U U U U U U U U U U U F~ a .~ ,°,' ~ Z A A A A O A A Z A A A A Aa ~ C d r I. L H _L .~ = t/~ y 'u L ~ U w e v e E d o ~ u ~ o w > ~ ~ p C I.~ W O Y ~ ~ d V C R T > O On C 7 ry 7 O CG a ~ A O °J `n o. ~ c~ ~ ~`' a ~ ._ . = a. " 'o o U o . E ~ > . E ~ . ~ o ~ u _ h ~ .. eC 9 R y Q ~ ~ = w °' x ~ T w c ~ a .° E a ~ 3 E `C °~ E r°• ~ ~ c L ~ . e ~ u on a~ 'g ~ 'R ` A o > ~° = r~ 3 ~ s ~ ~ a ` ~' c o o C ~ A '. ~, ' ' O R 7 ~bn ~ C x x a ., w ~ A V A U oG Z a' m O r . . ~ ~ tt o ~ 0 N E'" Y 01 ~y0 Z Tt D z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A w ~ ~ a a a o o ~ e o . ~ F" a 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 ° ¢ ~' '~ ~ e e W A A A A A ~ o0 0o en on A = u = = = ~ C C C C p ~ O O O O O ~ a~i a°Ji d L G G O D C C C C C O C C u u u u u C C C C C as C e0 C e7 C a w w w w w w w w w a 'a w w ~:. ~~ .. f 9-1 R L bD ~ ~ o a Q .y R ~~ ~ O ~ ~~r+ ~i ~ ~ i O ~ ~ C ~,,, a A a~'~,a U ~ .. 'a R U ~~ C ~ i~ L ;o a a a a a s a s a a a a a a a a a a w~' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 v c7 0o v c7 v C7 t7 v ~ c7 ~ v c~ ~ c7 v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 a 0 0 M .-~ V 1 N 0 0 M w a ° ° 0 ° o o 0 o ~ 0 0 0 0 O~ ~A O N h ~ N r N M w O O O O O T ~ O O O O O O O O O a V1 N N N O ~ ~ .r .r .r N N .r r N w l~ O O O O O O O O O O O O Q\ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V1 O O O O O ~ a O O O O O ~ N O ~ O ~ N O\ M O N ~A N ~ N O N ~ ~O ~ .r ~ ~ N .-~ ~ M ~ .-~ N b N w ~p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O l~ O O O O O O O O V~ O O N Q\ N O O O N N O ~..i O O ~ V7 M O b O V] .~ ~ ~O ..a N .r ..i .r ~ ..i ~ ~ e .r ~ .•r M M M N b M O ~O N '+ ~. N b N l~ ~+ N w °o °o 00 00 ~" C 0 0 0 0 O 'O 'L C M N O 7 O V M ~A ~ C N ~ R w O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O u O O O O O O O O O O O O O [^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r L. N O O ~ N b O Q O h O M N ..r N M O ~ 7 O O O l~ d' R O O M ~O O O M Vi O V1 O O Q V1 O ~ V.. V ~ ..r n M ~..i ~ i .~ M N R .~ M N N N ~A M . N C4 ,r .r .r a0 V y ~ • W W U U U ~ U W ~ U W U W W W W W U W L [r a . ,~ aai' cca z W Z W Z W W Z W Z W .'~ J Z Z Z z W W oa y E _ C ~" q O ' L o y U y ~ ao u d _ ~ ~ L 0. 'o ~ _ Q/ H .a ~ ~ c ~ E ~ c o 0 ~ o d , , ~ u ~ ~ U GL u U `O OD °~' ~ ~ ~ x a `° ~ o E ~ ~ ~' •° `° ~ ~ E ~ ° ~ d o i U ~ '" 'O ~ ~ o ~ q d ~ C ~ O E y ~ ~ a y a L ~ en O y, d o r `° U OD O Q. ` `n ' Y c U o C ~: °" a Q a 7 y C C ~ o ~ ~ O ~ o. ~ d p Q~ e c7 o L o L w O " •,°; C L, F °' E rig d r - ~ ~ ~ C .C C C O y R Y 'fl LL G C L F ~ R 'O V d r r V1 y F+ O " 'fl y V O O >' x C aJ V i 9 R d C 7 O d 7 u R a`Q+ d v aRi y > y ~ '~ u O c a d E Y i° Q 0 y ~ . d °. o. , , c a W C Q R w ~ G ..~ ~ O O U R O. F ~ ' L~ A O. a ~ 1 +rr I~+~ ~ pOi O_ ~ CQ yy ~ ~ y O_ a E 9 A L L E ~ C R ~ 0 ° °J a>'i '~°v a d ~ ~ ;y v' o 'ov a a. a d ~ a d •°'. R E 0 ao o 0o U Z d R C7 C1~ v~ ax d a O a x ..7w ~ w x d v u o~i ~Y F z ~ W ~ ~ ~ F r Q d C u N u 7 u y L 7 u H d 7 u H d 7 u H d 7 u N 6~ O V N L 7 u d 7 V V 3 V L 7 V d C u L 7 u u 7 V GI 7 V d J u d C V L 7 u L ~ C ~ u W A L a Y a d a 6J a d a L a CJ s y d a M u x N 6~ a h L a fq L a H d a H L a Vi L a N Y a VI d a Vl d a H CJ a 'O 7 'O 'O "O 'C 'C 'C 'O 'C 7 'C 'C 9 'C 'C 'O 'O 7 C G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C W d R d R d cC d eC d ~C d tQ L CQ L R d c! d cR CJ cC d ~C V CQ Cl tQ L W CJ R 6J cQ d CC d L 'w L 'w L 'w L iz L 'w L 'w L iz L 'w L iz L 'w L 'w L 'w L 'w - i~. - ~, - i; ~ k, L w - i~, ~. ~ 9-2 t~ 6 ~, CD ~ ~ .~ ~ GC ~ C ~ o ~~ E a ,~ ~ 4.w ~ ~ C~ O ~ C ~ A ~" ¢' A o~'~~ U R +.+ 'a ea U ~~ ~~ o ;S a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c7 c7 v c7 c7 c7 c7 c7 v t7 c7 c7 t7 c7 c~ C7 c7 C7 c7 m ° o o o a ~ N N M ~ M ..r M DO ~ ~" w ° ° n ° ° ° ° ° a o o o o a o o o o o ~ o o v~ v~ ~ o o ~ p~ 00 M R ~ 00 ri ~ 00 ~ N ~ V . -~ M . r .+ . ~p .w .w ~p N N W 00 O O O O O O O a O~ O O O O~ O O V7 ~A O O O [~ t~ O ~ O r O O [~ r ~ O O O V' ~ O N O a 00 M ~ [ N N O n [~ N 00 N a r N ~ V1 Vl b N N N O .~+ O .w M .~ .~ ~ O~ O [~ l~ ..r n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o ~o 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 ~ o o a o o .. o a s ~ o c~ ~ O~ l~ 00 [~ M O~ O~ 7 ~D ~O O M ~ M ~ ~ N N ~ ~ M N N N M ~ M ~ r . . ..a W ~p O O O O O O O O O 7 'R N O N Q~ O O O O O O O O O 01 O~ ~A O ~ ~ p~ O O~ N N ~ ~-+ O V1 O O O l~ O Vl O O O l~ O O~ O O~ ..n N O fi . . N ~~„~ [~ .R. N M ~ Q O ~p N 01 01 M . r M O O L C O 1 O ~ O . V O ~ O L C ~..i 6. ~ W O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O~ O~ N O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O h l~ ~A O O ~ ~O O 1/1 .",~ .. O O O~ O O ~ O O O O O O O O O V~ V^ ~ R O N [~ O O^ u ~+ ' ~ N r N a r R V7 O r N O ~ N r M M N O M T 00 7 V7 O V1 _ O 01 01 7 M 7 7 O ~O ~ ~O O V7 ~A 00 ~O M V1 N 00 l~ L U '~ V1 N 7 'r O b .r D\ M ~••~ ..i M .•~ V1 ~ 4L .r .. M ..r M M u u '` U W W W W > W U W U U U U W W U U U W U F- a .Y a s w a w w ~ a z z z z ~ z ~ z w z w z as d a, c. w ,o ~ u ' ~ ~ c R .a ~ d '$ C c >, C O . ti d u O . u c E - T y ~ a u `n E E ° ' ~ on ° R > E c O u d ~ > O C ~ ~ r o •y O ~ a w ti = d ~ a R > °, d a °' L W R ~..y d ., ~ d ~ _ v d a L R o, ,a ~> V '~ C ~ > y x C C 7 ~"' W C R u T W ' R M. d L •" C u .O u > C ~ C ~ i L u O d C R '- O T O R C vi OOU R ~. O L U r7 L L: u u E '- C O u a .D ~ R r, ~ .y ~ p r L :~ ~ 3 ~ ~ o a E ~ ~ a ~ c R a ~ a L .. oa 3 c R ~ u F .7 ~ ~ j . a ` L ` ° ° ' e ~ ` L y ~ E E ~ ` ' °' e o d °° a r a .o a R E ~ m W ' ~ ~ u E •> A a C ~ •> L' y> r~ C H L M > C O ~+ Vl L >. '~ d V] V] >, ~' C d L O ~ R 4+ eC R V1 C i ~ O y > °' ~ > d d ~ u ~ F ~ . ` > i °' a' ~ 9 ~ ~ C ~ U o f 3 ~ ~ a~ `~ E a F, u cis ~ s w~ u a L 00 ~ y L R a i a"i L ~ L ° ~ d' L '- o ~ > '~ o 'v aLi e i ° a+ a + R > as ~ w ~ da w w a O w U U a Fd z > V ~x ~ U ~ ~ Q a `e v ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ 3 a 3 r v v A w v ~ z y F H ~ H y y y C C C C C C C RL [.. a °' °' °' °' °' o e e e e e ~ d • V • V • ~ e e ,,, L L L L L L ~ _ C W R R R R R R R A v~ rn ~ v~ rig v~ d' d' ~ v aai aa, aa, E L L L L L L A A Q A A A Q V L L L L L L y V y V y y u L 6~ ~ R R R R R R C u C d O u O u C u C u V V V V U O L d L O L O L O L O L O C7 c7 G7 C7 C7 c7 a° a°. a° a° a° a° a° a` a a a :~ .a 'a 9-~ a 9-3 G r.. dD y O ~ ~ O ~p a" ~ CO ~ C ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ o ~o a '" ~ a~ c y,aA c ~'~ .n U R y .~ U a ;a ~ a a ° ~ O ~ ~ a A s A a A a ~ a ~ a ~ a c ~ ~` A m 7 C C 7 co co C 7 co C 7 C 7 w C 7 co m cC C 7 C 7 7 C C 7 ~ ° ° ° ° ° o o o o o ~ ~ o 0 " 0 0 " .~ a o o o o o ~" N V1 00 O w ^~ a a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 ~ 00 ~ 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 00 " o a a vi in o 0 0 0 oo in ~i r ~ ~ ~ .~.~ 7 N ~ ~ N M N ~. -: r w ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a r o O 0 V~ 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o ~ r N ~ O ~ 7 O ~ O O 00 O N ~ O~ nor O N N ~ N V1 M ~ R •'+ r o~Oo v.i ..i 00 w r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~O a r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o o r ~ l~ O O O O O O O V7 O O N O O O Q~ O~ O ~O r ~D try S O ~ i_A N r O N ~ 7 T N .r O R O~ M O~ .r 01 .r V~ VI ~ ...i ? N N M N 00 R ri O~ ~p O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~D p~ M O O O O O O O M O O O O r ~ N O O O O O O ~A t~ O O O O ~O p~ O N O N r O ~ M N N r [~ 00 ~ ..r V1 M Vl r d' .w b 7 R ~ V1 N N Q N N 00 ~+ N N N w ^' L 'C O O O O O r O 'D 7 O R ~A N 1n .L ; ~,•~ OD ..r ~ O~ .•• N M °• k, o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~„ 0 0 0 o v~ 0 0 0 0 o v; 0 " 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 " o e' a+ y • vi a vi vi M N V1 r o o ~: o 0 0 0 0 V~ oo ~ ~ ~o ~0 0 O L. U N M r '+ ~O ~O N l ~ .r M ao Q .~+ N 7 .r O 7 r iA M N V1 O O O~ ~ ~O ..~ r ~..i N O~ !+~ in N ~n N r r r .~ ao O Ow .~ N b fi N N ~ . r u y •` U ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ~ U U ~ a Y v'~ z A a A z A A z A z A A A d Q d A a z Aa U L ~ +~ ~ L Q _ ~ d Q G! U ~ t d e v ~' ° :; o, ~ °_ U E ~ U C ~ G Q C Y V ~ L U Y 0 o a a L ~ ~ ~' R . , ~ d > > V h7 ~_ r r r~r °" L ` A ~ ` E " Z . . y „ v ~ E d ~ t „ . c c ~ e ~ ~ ~. U ~ a L s ~ y ~ Q o O ~ " id U OJ y Y 0. L O V ~ ~ '= c o L4 = r ~ ~ Q c R p„ i. ea O ~ on y L ~ U e ~ E. a° ~ c d a W r Q x °- •v .o o •~ r LL ~ ? 0 ~ > o a - d U c~ ..~ w w c7 Q m vai a 3 •> z 3 'i ~ n. a oa r 0 ~ v r j t ~ u d C z ° y r ~ W C o C 0 C 0 O 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C C C G C C C G C C ~ F ~ 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 o y ~ _ c V CQ d R 6~ R d CC L R d CO Y R d R V ~ 6J R L cC L ~R CJ R N CQ d yR d R R C L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 6~ L L L C r~ C y W u v a v u x v u a u a a v w a u u a u u a ~ a, a u u a u u a ~ a~ a u a~ a u a~ a v a~ a v v a u u a ~ ~., a+ e= ao y p ~ ~ A o o a o 0 o w a a o o w o 0 0 0 0[. ~ e c c e e e c e c e e e e e e e e w ea ca a ea a1 ee ea G C G a G m m G G a ~ VI Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y •L L L R a L R a. L CQ a L R w L CC a, L CC a L CQ w L CC a L 06 w L K a L Cd a. L © a L CQ a L C7 a L CO a L CC a L R a ~ O V] U Y-•° 9-4 R O. CC i.i an y O s.. ~ a ~ G~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ 8 a ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~G.A c ~' ~ a U ~ y 'a ~a U 0o d ~~ ~e 3 w3~ w~ ~ ~ a a~ i 3 m o a o 0 0 o o ~ a 0 o M b ~ ~ p M 0 0 M [~ O T O O O O 00 ~ 0 O O O T ~ ~ r a . -~ M M ~ r w a °o °o 00 °o ~ r o 0 0 o N ~ p V0j 000 M ~ .w M M [~ N ~ ~ w a °o °o °o °o °o ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O VO1 VOl 00 00 M .w M ~ M Q ~ N M N w a ~ 0 0 o e vi O1 ~ o °o °o 0 ion 0 Oo 0 ~ 0 i°n Ooo ~ o .. .r ~p O~ M [ ~ M ~+ O ~r ~O N ~ ~ N k O O O O O O O O M L C O O O O O O O O [~ O 'O 't O O M VO1 N R 7 M ~!7 O ~A 000 M ~ N 0~0 ~ G~- G? .r" M .. .r °o °o °o 00 00 °o °o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c~ GJ y O O V1 ~A N ~ O O ~D d' L U M ~O N R " 00 O O~ M ~ a ..; ao ~o .•; o+ v~ u y U U U U U U U H a .Y a~ d~ Aa 0 a _ O C u ti `° a E U E y E v d ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ U a, m y ~ i R v E a C ~ ~ en rn m e _ ~ ~ O y r ~ CL ~ ~ ~ L ~ L • O x W 3 ~ a ~ ~, ~ x ~, 3 ~ :a R (~ F ~ L Y C L d A a ? ~ ~ ~ ~ R L e~+ ~ L w ~ L ~ a L d 3 L d 3 L d 3 ~ ~ 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ d v E Q Y C W ~ F e a E° W A L a L ~ L ~ L 3 L 3 L 3 L 3 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ x w aco~a3w~ L ,~ 7 C C ~ > w W ' c ~ E a o c u .c°. ~ e ~ 'C a y O ~ d ~ O ~y d a e 0 U 3 d a ~+ y ~, ~ -~I L ~ L CC L ~ ~ :ac°oc7a`3wcc U w ~ > H d x d u C C y R E y d o. ~ o. 'E •~ ;a U W ~ :7 Z A W d T v a ~ O ~ w y V G b0 u 'm U u L ar d y u a z A w d q-r 9-5 a 3 Q~ Vl a n. U N U C w^ E a 0 O N 0 S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING E%ECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 RESOLUTION 32895-5 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $10,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $10,100,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code") on March 28, 1995 on the issuance of school bonds in the amount of $10,100,000. WHEREAS the School Board of the County has requested by resolution the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10,100,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole 1 multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1995A"; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning January 15, 1996, (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10) over the annual interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed eight percent (8~) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in paragraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than approximately 20 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty 20 days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. 6. Payment; Paying Aqent and Bond Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest 2 Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. (c) Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive ............. 103$ July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive ............. 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive ............. 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter .......................... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 3 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate; Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. 12. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 4 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March 28, 1995, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ATTEST: Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 30th day of March, 1995. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (SEAL) 5 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA March 28, 1995 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on March 28, 1995, the following persons were present or absent as shown: PRESENT: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix ABSENT: None Upon motion by Supervisor Minnix, the following resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by the following roll call vote, as recorded in the minutes of the meeting: MEMBER VOTE Supervisor Johnson Pass, Yes Supervisor Kohinke Yes Supervisor Eddy No Supervisor Nickens Pass, Yes Supervisor Minnix Yes Exhibit A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) NO. TR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1995A The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Dollars ($ ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 1996 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2015 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year commencing on January 15, 1996 (each an "Interest Payment Date' ; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. 1 For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1- 227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in 2 the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. On twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public School Authority, the County shall deliver, at its expense, this Bond in marketable form, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated 3 maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive...... 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive...... 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive...... 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter ................... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated May _, 1995. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia By Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia 5 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) \VSA\ROANK\ROANKZS.RSO ACTION NO. f ITEM NUMBER "'" f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Adoption of a Resolution on the Issuance of not to exceed $10,100,000 General Obligation School Bonds to Finance Certain Capital Projects for School Purposes. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On September 27, 1994, the Board of Supervisors approved the application to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) for $10,100,000 of School bonds to be included in the Spring 1995 bond sale. The items included in this bond sale are as follows Fort Lewis Elementary -Architect and Engineering $100,000 New Cave Spring High School -Architect and Engineering 1,500,000 Major Renovations 4,000,000 Northside Gym/Auditorium 3,500,000 South County Stadium Renovation 1,000,000 Total $10,100,000 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the closing procedures for the VPSA, the County Board is required to hold a public hearing on this sale. At the conclusion on the public hearing, the Board should consider adopting the attached resolution which will be submitted to the VPSA as part of the bond closing papers. The closing date for this bond sale is scheduled to be on or about Apri126, 1995. The actual amount of bonds sold may be reduced by the estimated amount of interest income anticipated to be earned on the construction funds. m:\fmance\common\board\3-28-95.wpd March 21, 1995 T-I FISCAL IMPACT: The first payment date for these bonds is scheduled for January 15, 1996, therefore, there will not be a fiscal impact for debt service during the current budget year. Funds are being included in the FY 1995-96 budget to pay for the January 15, 1996 bond payment which is estimated to be $486,000. The FY 1996-97 budget will need to include a full year of debt service which is currently estimated to be approximately $1,204,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that at the conclusion of the public hearing the Board will adopt the attached resolution approving the bond sale of not to exceed $10,100,000 General Obligation School bonds to be sold to the VPSA in the Spring 1995 bond sale. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ ~. ~ ~~ c.~.~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens U m:\finance\common\board\3-28-95.wpd March 21, 1995 ~~ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $10,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Boazd of Supervisors (the "Boazd") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow not to exceed $10,100,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code") on March 28, 1995 on the issuance of school bonds in the amount of $10,100,000. WHEREAS the School Boazd of the County has requested by resolution the Boazd to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Boazd hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10,100,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Boazd, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, aze hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1995A"; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning January 15, 1996, (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) at the rates established in accordance with pazagraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) in the yeazs (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. / 3/ 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the annual interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed eight percent (8%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in paragraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than approximately 20 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, the Bonds shall be in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. On twenty 20 days written notice from the VPSA, the County shall deliver, at its expense, Bonds in marketable form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, as requested by the VPSA, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. • 6. P~vment: Paying~lgent and Bond Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. (c) Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepavment or Redem tp ion. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which the -2- T- ~ Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: ~ ~ July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive ............. 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive ............. 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive ............. 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter .......................... 100; Pr vi ed, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ~ v r m tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate: Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute aNon-Arbitrage Certificate and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds -3- from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Non- Arbitrage Certificate and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement. The Boazd hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Boazd, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, aze hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. 12. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County aze hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 13. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Boazd, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate aze hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on Mazch 28, 1995, and of the whole thereof so faz as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regulazly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. ~J -4- ~- i WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this _ day of March, 1995. Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (SEAL) • • -5- TI Exhibit A FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND ( ) NO. TR-1 $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 1995A The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Dollars ($ ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 1996 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2015 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year commencing on January 15, 1996 (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar") shall make all T-i payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Vir inia Public School Authorit , in immediate) available funds at or g Y Y before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registraz, and the County shall be fully dischazged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County aze irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.1-227.25 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County aze not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of -2- 1991, Chapter 5.1, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Boazd of Supervisors of the County and the School Boazd of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds in definitive form having maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid, issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. On twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public School Authority, the County shall deliver, at its expense, this Bond in marketable form, in exchange for the temporary typewritten Bond. This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on books of the County kept by the Bond Registraz, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registraz shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2005, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2005, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, aze subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any -3- "T-1 date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive...... 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive...... 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive...... 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter ................... 100; Pr v' d, w v ,that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed • -4- 'T= 1 by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated May , 1995. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: By Clerk, Boazd of Supervisors Chairman, Boazd of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, of the County of Roanoke, Virginia Virginia • -5- ~~-' ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersi ned sells assi ns and transfers unto g ~ g (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) \VSAUtOANK\ROANK25.RS0 Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) ~iiiiuii~iiiuiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiuiiiuuuiiuiiuuiiuiiuiiiiiuiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuit~ -~ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. % --- / _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST __ _ - = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS r ;,, L+ _ SUBJECT: ~ " Y" fit/ ~T ~' y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ f ~. ~ _ ~ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ _ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. ._ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ~_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ c -_ ,_ _ NAME -' ~ `? '- ADDRESS - ~~ ; ~~ y, ~ ~' ~~ ~1 ~ ' C ~, -_ PHONE ~, '~ ~ - ~`;~~ ~ ~~ c _. fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ill~~~~~~~~~~ll~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ll~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~ll~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~il~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~lll~lllljlJ _ _ _ _ - ;- _ _ _ __ _~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ = APPE CE REQUEST _ _ - - "PUBLIC HEARING O RDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ _ SUBJECT: S c~oo~ ~~ ~~-~.c~c -_ -. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. ,_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK • ,~ NAME ~, ~ ~.e_ ~o ~r , ~ __ -_ ADDRESS ~ Z2 S ~ 1, ' ti -~-e ._ PHONE ~ ~~ - Liz 3 ~ c _. ~_ mliililllllillillllillllllllllllllllllliillillllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllililllliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 11111111111 ~iiiuu~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiuiuiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiiiii~ _ ~ - - -~ - _ _ _ _ -_ -_ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE -_ CE REQUEST -_ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENT S -_ SUB CT: ~~F~r 1 ~" ~~~ JE ~ 11c~~~; ~ ~ G~~x~l r3~,~cf _ - _ - _ -_ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time I~mit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - NAME ~.~?~ r i ~c _ _ __ _ _ .- - q~ ADDRESS _ M ~~~r ~~ ~,c v-~ ~~ - ,_ "" PHONE ~ ~c~ _ ~ cj~ - _. fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiitiiiiii ~~~~~~~~ii1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER T~'" ~• ~• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Real Estate Tax Rate. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As reported to the Board of Supervisors at the February 28, 1995 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate Tax rate for the calendar year 1995 as follows: Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Real Estate Tax rate for the 1995 calendar year. No ordinance which imposes or increases a tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1-504). The proposed Real Estate Tax rate of $1.13 was advertised on March 14, 1995 and March 21, 1995; therefore, this tax rate is scheduled for adoption April 4, 1995. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, .~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~, ~, ~ ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To O Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ k Illlllllllllllllllilllillllllllilllllllillil lllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllljj) 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ - - - ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO.Ty Z. ' ~ _ -_ s ~ ~ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~1 e-/3 ~ _ _ _. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to co t mmen = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. r c _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~~ 1/ ~ d S . ~6 U ~' ~ y ... _ c ADDRESS 3 `~/ 9 ~ S ~I /~1 ~ /3~ ~' ~Q, S. „v, _ __ _ _ PHONE .7 7 `~ ~ 8 Y~ c ~_ IIIIIillllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllll 11 llllllllllllllllillillliillilllilllliillllllliililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ ~iiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuuiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ - _ - _ - SUBJECT: ~~oGE r'' - _ - _ - _ _. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the - __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = - ~ - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - _ - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - V ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _ - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - =_ NAME ~''v ~ ~ /~'vs 3°r ~ - _ - _ - _ - ADDRESS ~~L 3 !~ ~.~~v >~-~,~' ~ ;~~c ~~~ ~ ~ ~ - - P~IONE 77 ~ --~q3~ - ._.. miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - ~~~~~m ~~Illlllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllililllillllllllllltllllllllliilllillllllllilllllllllililllliilllilillllllilllll _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ - _ .- _ _ - SUB CT: _. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the - _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _ - _ - - - NAME ~ - _ = ADDRESS r '- - - - - _ - = PHO1vE 9 ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ -- _.. _~ mllllliillllllillllilllilllliililllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllilillllllllilililillllllllllllllllillllllli 111111111 i ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'- ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: `"`~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As reported to the Board of Supervisors at the February 28, 1995 Budget Work Session, staff advertised the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the calendar year 1995 as follows: Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the 1995 calendar year. No ordinance which imposes or increases a tax or levy shall be adopted unless fourteen days have elapsed following the last required publication of intention to propose the same for passage (State Code Section 15.1-504). The proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates were advertised on March 14, 1995 and March 21, 1995; therefore, these tax rates are scheduled for adoption April 4, 1995. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator / ~~ ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has advertised a notice of proposed tax increase for real estate taxes for calendar year 1995, as dictated by State code section 58.1-3321. This advertisement was published in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 21, 1995. All other requirements of this code section have been met. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed "Effective" Real Estate Tax rate increase for FY1995-96. Respectfully submitted, W. W. Brent Robert on Budget Manager Approved by, ~ ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohinke Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Amendment of the 1994-95 Budget for the Purpose of Appropriating Funds for the Clean-Up of Dixie Caverns SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Although the Board had anticipated certain costs with respect to the on-going clean-up action of the Dixie Caverns landfill, the Board elected to delay appropriation of funds until the project approvals were received, and until the 1993-94 audit was complete. A significant portion of the unappropriated funds are designated for this purpose. Removal Action - stream bed clean-up is progressing. The material is being treated and disposed of in an approved on-site facility. Remedial Action - the electric arc furnace dust is being loaded onto trucks, shipped to and treated at an approved facility in Tennessee. Staff estimates that removal and remedial action costs for the remainder of this fiscal year will total $2,250,000. An appropriation in the amount of $2,250,000 is necessary in order to balance the appropriate accounts. Because of the large dollar amount included in this appropriation, it is necessary that the County hold a public hearing and adopt the attached ordinance related to this appropriation. In addition, this appropriation includes the necessary reimbursement language that will allow the County, if the Board so chooses, to include this expense in a future bond sale, as long as the bond sale occurs within 18 months of the completion of the cleanup. FISCAL IMPACTS• The fiscal impact of this request is an appropriation of $2,250,000 from the Unappropriated Balance. This will formally appropriate the amount that is currently designated for Dixie 1 ~,- Caverns in the general fund unappropriated balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At the conclusion of the public hearing, staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve at first reading an ordinance appropriating the sum of $2,250,000 from the Unappropriated Balance for expenses associated with the clean-up of Dixie Caverns Landfill. Second reading of this ordinance is scheduled for April 11, 1995. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~.~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to dixie.approp.2nd Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs 2 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE, BY THE APPROPRIATION OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,250,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE AND OTHER SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL WHEREAS, environmental remediation expenses at Dixie Caverns landfill exceed currently appropriated and available funds, and it is necessary to amend the adopted Fiscal Year 1994-1995 budget and appropriation ordinance to provide additional expenditures for these purposes; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-162.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, requires publication of notice and a public hearing if an amendment to the budget of a local government to increase the aggregate amount appropriated exceeds one percent of the total revenue in the budget or $500,000, whichever is lesser; and WHEREAS, notice of this proposed amendment was published as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the County reserves the opportunity to reimburse itself for these expenditures from the proceeds of a future indebtedness, if the Board of Supervisors so chooses; and, WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading was held on April 11, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That Ordinance No. 61494-9, the appropriation ordinance 3 ~~~ for the Fiscal Year 1994-1995 budget, is hereby amended by the appropriation of the sums to the following fund for the functions and purposes authorized and approved by the Board of Supervisors as follows: From Fiscal Year 1994-95 General Fund Unappropriated Balance $2,250,000 To Dixie Caverns $2,250,000 2) The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of environmental remediation at the Dixie Caverns Landfill from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for such costs is increased to $3,750,000. 3) This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. general\approp.2nd 4 i U' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE 32895-6 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 7.93 ACRES LOCATED AT 2331 AND 2393 HAMMOND DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 71.00-1-6 AND 71.00-1-8) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EP TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres, as described herein, and located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, (Tax Map Number 71.00-1-6 and 71.00-1-8) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of EP, Explore Park District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of VA Recreational Facilities Authority. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 - A 2.00-acre parcel of real estate located on the west side of Virginia Secondary Route 1029 designated Tax Map No. 71.00-1-8. 1 =e~~i--~~rf ~-a~- e ~~ 6=~ ~t ~ ~1~ ~ i t-~i e-eerrzez-vr}cr~"rc-6uzi-c~ .. , ~ ~. ,... ,. ~... ~, . ~ ~ e ~ e rg r e e~~e ~ei~ -d r~ +.'' ~ r fl ~~.~ ~ • ~' P~e~~ en~~ ~ es -~ € A a e~ :-~e~er-oz k $~ d ~-c~ee -~5~~- ~~ re ~5~- ~e-e- € ~ z - - ~- ~TA~r ~~e~e~--s- 3 ~ ~~ f > --€e el- e~ ee - e e-e~ ~ -a e erre~-~~e~re~e-8~8 ~ ~ ~~ *~~r-r~=-e~r ~ ~ e -~S s~ ~ e-e~e ~r~~e-~ ~-a ~T ~ ~ ~e ~ ra ~ --~a=r ~e e-6-E ~~~ w ~ ~R~~ee-~-i~ te~e-ems- m ~ ~~ } ~ ess ; e-a -~e ~re~ree s ~-1/ = ~ ~ea~~~~ ~ ~~t - ~e~e~- ~ -t ~ r~ ~ ~ r r - e~ a ~e e e~=eFe~~P~ ~e~~e-Z ~ -~ d ~ i r T }z-i~ ~= z„ -~-ne~ e e~rd- ~e ~ ~~e~ e~ ~T- e 7 ye~ee~r t~ tai moo= G') / 1 C 11 T 1 7 ~ ~ d o n T ~-e a ei~-tie g ~ -ee~e~ ~ e€- - T ~ eg~~~~~---3~~-~c~ t ~ ~ ~e~e~--e-€~re-e~ t an d - ~ e =t~ e Tea~ r~~e-a=e~g~e '~ Tr e ~e~ e-€~ ~ - a -~ --€ ~-~ . ~ i ~ n~-e-€--~~e~e~T ~~ I e c ei g ~~ees-~-re nees-S / n n z+ n -~ 4-~ e~-~ ° ~ ~ ~ 6 ~~6 iirc T- iei~ee- ' ~z-uc~~.r-rv-~- m} '" ~ ai Fe=--~ v zz~I~Fgzrr cPi s-arra ~~s ; -dam ed~~eee~ e z 's-T' 8 6zTCCVrEarrn-QCC~B 6 6~~rri-' .-~ P-~-8~= ~ ~ e--~r~a~e~F -E ,~; ,~ n~ ~~ ~ ~ , p g r r e e a-Ord--des~ -~ra~ed- -~ P~ ~~ v et ~r =-e~}c n s-~~~e g as a~~ ag- e- ~$--~6 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance to rezone only Parcel 1 (2.0 acres) with Parcel 2 being continued until April 25, 1995, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 2 A COPY TESTE: ~. ~C.l~[~c.. Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 v-~ 0 NORTH --- _-_ ~~ ~.~ S~• Map 71.14 I^ ^ 100' •y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIATG AND ZONING Rt. 63a ~ I i a S~~ Map TI.11 0 9 j I' + loo' 10 243+e Ast^wO i 9^d/ad Cn 1 2804efD1 ` C 2.21Ae ICI .,p~y ~ M~yQ~ o ./ ~ ~ ~ ° ' Rid98 ~.,, 3 e .~~i ,~~ ~• AG_3 T G _#.ra~' e.e'cn~ r~„ AG- 3 w.~ EP II Facifii~es AvNt / 9249 AC (DI p 10.21 AO ~1 AG-s I A G -3 O ~,uKia 1 j' ~ G 3 88.33 Ac 3 47 TDAt ~ G, A~-{~ C,o /`~G -3 z 2s.~skwi 1 46.38 K 0611e Ll VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY 7.1.00-1-6 ~ 7t.oo-~-8 PETITIONER: VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES CASE NUMBER: 6-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of VA Recreational Facilities Authority to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres from EP to AG-3, located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Responding to questions from the Commission, staff pointed out that the 2-acre parcel required a variance because it didn't meet the 3-acre requirement for the AG-3 district; a letter from an adjoining property owner who requested a delay was handed out at the work session. The Commission asked about the easement and who will benefit from the sale of the properties. George Nester commented as follows: as a condition of the sale of the 5.93 acre parcel, we will require a 50-foot easement in order to have access to the remainder of the property; the two-acre parcel is under contract; the monies received from the sale of these properties will go to the Explore project. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other f ,. ``'"~ Terrance Harrington, Secre~aiy Roanoke County Planning Commission V-~ • • STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Va. Recreational Facilities Auth PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FILE NO.: 6-3/95 DATE PREPARED: March 7, 1995 The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority proposes to sell two parcels occupied by single-family residences that have been determined to be surplus property. To insure clear title and improve marketability, they are requesting the property be rezoned from EP, Explore Park to AG-3. The staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts from this proposal. B. DESCRIPTION The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) is requesting to rezone two parcels containing 2.0 acres and 5.93 acres respectively from the EP, Explore Park district, to AG-3, Low Density Agricultural. • The two parcels have been determined to be surplus property by the Explore Park Board of Directors. They are located at the end of Hammond Drive which is located in the Vinton Magisterial district. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In the Explore Park district (Section 30-71) there is a requirement that only lands owned by the VRFA can be zoned EP. The only uses allowed under this EP zoning are those included in the Explore Master Plan approved by the Board in June 1993, which does not explicitly permit single family residences. While the use could be continued as a grandfathered activity, this could restrict interested buyers and limit financing options available. Under the proposed AG-3 zoning the minimum lot size is 3 acres. On February 15, 1995 the Board of Zoning Appeals considered and approved a variance for the existing 2 acre parcel. • v-~ PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background: The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority, the governing body for Explore Park, acquired land beginning in the late 1980's from willing sellers for the creation of Explore Park. In order to generate revenues for current projects, the Authority has reevaluated its property holdings and decided that a few parcels, including the parcels in question, could be sold without jeopardizing the long range Explore Park project. The parcels in question were created before 1980 and until 1992 were zoned A-1 with a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. In 1992 the parcel and surrounding area was zoned AG-3 during the Countywide Comprehensive Rezoning. In June 1993 767 acres, including the two acre parcel in question, were rezoned to the Explore Park (EP) district, a special district specifically established and designed for the Park. Existing Characteristics: Each of the lots in question presently contain a single family residence served by individual wells and septic systems. Access to the properties is by way of~Hammond Drive, with the 5.93 acre further served by a 15 foot wide easement. Surrounding Area: The surrounding area consists of open space and scattered rural residences. Immediately adjoining the 2 acre parcel to the north is the Blue Ridge Parkway. With the exception of other properties owned by VRFA, which are also zoned EP, the entire area is zoned AG-3. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Development Potential: At this time there are no proposals to modify the existing uses of the property. Future use would be governed by the AG-3 district which is limited primarily to low density residential and agricultural uses. Neither of the parcels could be further subdivided (except under provisions for a family exemption) due to the 3 acre minimum lot size and the requirement for 200 feet of public road frontage. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This areas is designated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan as Rural Preserve. The proposed zoning and current use would be consistent with the Plan Map and policies, given the historical configuration of these properties. Petition: VRFA 2 File No.: 6-3/95 v~~ STAFF CONCLUSIONS PART III The rezoning proposed is primarily to permit the sale of property otherwise encumbered by a special zoning designation designed exclusively for the Explore Park. The present use which predates the 1992 zoning ordinance and limited potential for further development preclude any significant impact from this proposal. Approval of this request would ensure a clear and unencumbered title and should substantially improve the marketability of these two properties. No proffered conditions are recommended by staff. • Petition: VRFA 3 File No.: 6-3/95 • 2. 87,120 • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 - Roanoke, VA 24018 (7031 772-2068 FAX 1703) 772-2030 For staff use on/v ~- date rae iyyd~ - /J~ r dceivcd by: application fce~ ~-' PCBZ:. da[e ~y. placards issued: BOS data• /J Case Number: ~ ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): Ll REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Rupert Cutler Phone: 427-1800 Address: P. 0. Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24014-8508 Owner's name: Virginia Recreational Facilites Authority Address: P. 0. Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia Phone: 427-1800 Zip Code: 24014-8508 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 71.00-1-6 & 71 .00-1-8 2393 Hammond' Drive ~ 2331 Hammond Dr Vinton, Virginia 24179 .Magisterial District: Vinton Community Planning Area: Roanoke River Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: Explore Park (EP District) & 5.93 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential ~ 258.310.8 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: AG-3 Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential Y. For staff Usa On/ use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. - If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO . ....................... Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: ~s the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee (WAIVED) ::<::t X Application "'`~` Metes and bounds description `''< Proffers, if applicable X Justification ~: Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners . -._ l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consepi7o! the owner. r~ 7 ,. Owner's Signature: ' Foi Staff Use On/y: Case Number • :::::::::::::::::::: i::: E::::::::: is is i::: i::::: is i s E::: i s i::: E: i::::: E:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;: E: E:::::::::;:;:;:;:;:;: ;:;: i:;:;:;:::::::::: ~:::::: s::::: i::: E::::::::::: E::: E:: ~:::::?::::: ~:; :::; ::::: E:::; . .. .. €€€;<f(~~~~~14~'f.~:7 :.,,:..:~3 ... .:.....::.......~ .~~~SP~~~14~~~~:tS£'f?~'f~lf>1`t:T. ~ . .,i ~....t~~..'. ~...: ~..: ~ `'~:' E E `-i~~ ESE ~{ .......~f.f ...~.x..F~'~~'.Q1Vflu .............................................................................................................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: Applicant_Virginia Recreational Facilities Author; y (Rnnart c'„t1Pr,1 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This lot is presently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. The Explore Park Board of Directors has declared the lot surplus. To enable prospective buyers to finance the purchase will require a conventional zoning designation. The adjoining properties are in private ownership and are zoned AG-3. This rezoning is compatible with existing neighborhood zoning. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Long Range plans for the area suggest a planned unit (Explore type use). Existing land use is residential for the subject lot. Existing land use for the area is predominantly AG-3. Although this reversion is inconsistent with general plan, it is consistent with existing land uses of neighborhood. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact will not be noticeable to adjoining neighbors or the community. No development is proposed: The existing single family use that is currently in place will be continued. Property is presently served by private well and septic system. • v-~ January 24, 1995 - An outdoor classroom and Going history museum enabling visitors to learn about the Gtnd, unldlife, and early American civilizations though a diversity of experiences at the • American Center for Rare and Endangered Species • The Environmental Education Center of Virginia • American Wilderness Park • Native American Indian Park • Blue Ridge Settlement at Milepost 115 on the Blue Ridge Parkuxty County of Roanoke Planning Department 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Sir: Re: 2332 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District Enclosed are two (2) completed applications for the rezoning of land owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. This property has been declared surplus by the Authority. These efforts are geared to the liquidation of these properties. Proceeds from the sale will be used to offset part of the accumulated debt of the Explore Park. These properties are currently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. Adjoining properties are zoned AG-3. Both parcels are used for single family residential uses. The requested rezoning is compatible with existing zoning and land uses. Both units are served by individual wells and septic tanks. The two (2) acre parcel at 2331 Hammond Drive will require a variance. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot area in an AG-3 zone of three (3) acres. This parcel does not meet that minimum requirement. Other regulations or the AG-3 Zoning District can be met. Thank you for waiving the rezoning and variance fees for the Explore Park. Should you have questions or need additional information regarding these matters please contact me. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance. Administered by Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code §10.1.1600 et. seq. in partnership unth The River Foundation I.R.C. §501 (c) (3) Post Office Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014.8508 (703) 427-1800 FAX (703) 427.1880 Sincerely, /~ ~/ George W. I`Ies er, CM, AICP General Manager Enclosures c: Dr. Rupert Cutler File VIRGINIA'S ~l~ JI~li PAR K ., i• v-~ NORTH ~; p ~ See Map TI.11 r + 100' ,~ u See Map lt.l4 1•• loo' PockWOy Ridge •~ 8i~e ~~.. ./.. I• AG-3 ~ G.~~ r,,, w. ~ &P Fxilines hii/t / AG .3 O 88.53 Ac ~~~ ~1 f}G-3 \~ ~` ~~ ~ \~ \\ ~ \~- Rt. 63a ~ I i i i OI N ~ y s b 243Ae Ast~J 9~a/ae Co i 230Ac(Ol G :•~ 2.21 Ac Ia ..A~y I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ J... 9 70 ~ O, ~- ss~i o ''_~ ,fe I " ~.` 3 l,a.., ,.,~. f} G'r,~~ 6.8G Ae ~ AG~3 11 p eaz(Aa 1cl G-5 A O 3sA~tol ~szAo(a /~ ~4 G 3 3 az7oAC fir} G A ~' f 3 ~'.0 4 2 28.55AC W1 ~,~ ~, 4G38 Ac Raliw~ ,~ * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY 7t.oo-1-6 ~ 71.00-1-8 V-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION TWO PARCELS OF LAND .TOTALING 7.93 ACRES LOCATED AT 2331 AND 2393 HAMMOND DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 71.00-1-6 AND 71.00-1-8) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EP TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF OA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AIITHORITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres, as described herein, and located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, (Tax Map Number 71.00-1-6 and 71.00-1-8) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of EP, Explore Park District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of VA Recreational Facilities Authority. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 - A 2.00-acre parcel of real estate located on the west side of Virginia Secondary Route 1029 designated Tax Map No. 71.00-1-8. Parcel 2 - Beginning at a point in the center of the outlet l ~f-1 road leading to Va. Sec. Rte. 1029, being the southeasterly corner of John T. Schaaff property and being the northeasterly point of the property hereby described; thence with center of the outlet road along the line of Alvin B. Hammond property S. 0 deg. 15' 57" E. 307.57 feet to a planted stone; thence S. 13 deg. 00' W. 25 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with a new line through Harvey J. Schaaff and Lola G. Schaaff property and along the center of an outlet road S. 56 deg. 17' W. 188.03 feet, more or less, to a point; thence still with the center of the said outlet road S. 47 deg. 00' 40" W. 295.96 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Mary Belle Schaaff property; thence with the said line of her property N. 38 deg. 13' 20" W. 558.74 feet to an iron by a corner post corner to Alvin B. Hammond property; thence with the line of the Alvin B. Hammond property N. 7 deg. 53' 15" W. 36.22 feet to a point in the center of an outlet road; thence along the center of the outlet road and with the line of the John T. Schaaff property the five following courses and distances: S. 81 deg. 50' 40" E. 145.39 feet to a point; thence N. 80 deg. 44' 40" E. 99.74 feet to a point; thence N. 52 deg. 21' 10" E. 129.97 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 17' 10" E. 130.99 feet to a point; thence N. 88 deg. 34' E. 282.04 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing 5.93 acres and being as shown on a map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated 14 December 1978 of record in Deed Book 1117, page 289 in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office and designated as Tax Map No. 71.00-1-6. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.varec.fac IIIITITtIi[Itinl~l~llllllllllll~l~ll~~~~~ll~l~ll~l~llllli~l~llll~~~i.l~~~llil~I~IIIIillllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllll~lJ,) - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - = AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ _, - r ~ - -_ APPE CE REQUEST -_ ~ ~ - - _ ,_PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = - - - ~ - -_,. = SUBJECT. ~/ - ~ ~ ___ ~ , , -- _ . ._ _~ ~~ ~ _ {/ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GTVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: = ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty ofgthe Board to =_ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized - speaker and audience members is not allowed. - __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _. =_ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c = = = = = = =_ - =_ - - NAME Q-- .~-~ ~-z ~- - -_ - - ADDRESS ,~ ~~~~~SSc-z ~ ~- - - - = = PHONE ~ ~ y 8~~~ mliliilllllllllllilllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllililllillillllllllllllilllllllillllllllllillililllllllll 111111111 IU~Il~lll~lillllllllllllllllllttllttllll~ll~ll~lll~~lllllllllillllill~ll~lllll~li~li~~lilililllllilll~lll~lllllllll~~lllllllllilil~ AGENDA TTEM NO. - ~-~ _ { t tz ' -- S iii r C .:,r, yiti !°~;~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: -_ -. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~ortty of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view oniv. • Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERIC AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ._ c = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK na~ _ _ c _ .~ NAME -~ i.~;,~) ,F, 1- ~-' ~.~ Lt "~- / ~ !" ~_ X ~~ l ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ c ADDRESS j' u . L s ~, ~ ~V ~ c ,~ i3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~. PHONE Lf z 7 ._ 1 ~ v cy mlllllllllllllilliiliillliilllllilllllillilllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllll illtllm a U.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE 32895-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 22.21-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3862 BUCR MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 98.01-2-25, 98.01-2-26, 98.01-2-27, 98.01-2-28) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR UPON THE APPLICATION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 22.21 acres, as described herein, and located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Number 98.01-1-25, 98.01-2-26, 98.01-2-27, 98.01-2-28) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at point 1 which lies on the southerly right of way 1 line of Buck Mountain Road (Va. Secondary Rte. 679) and which point constitutes the northwesterly corner of land conveyed to John C. and Virgie Donahue (DB 552, page 179) shown as Tax Map No. 88.03-2-57, and the northeasterly corner of Parcel 2 (Tax Map No. 98.01-2-27) described in deed from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr. to Virginia Asphalt Paving Company of record in Deed Book 1145, at page 312; thence leaving Buck Mountain Road, the following courses and distances: S. 45 deg. 18' 34" E. 207.57 feet to point 2; thence N. 62 deg. 06' 40" E. 154.55 feet to point 3; thence N. 59 deg. 54' 20" E. 70.99 feet to point 4; thence N. 72 deg. 39' 40" E. 84.55 feet to point 5; thence S. 32 deg. 16' 38" E. 687.20 feet to point 6; thence N. 71 deg. 13' 28" E. 371.20 feet to point 7; thence N. 73 deg. 20' 44" E. 478.39 feet to point 8; thence S. 16 deg. 39' 16" E. 155.51 feet to point 9; thence S. 32 deg. 22' 06" W. 558.93 feet to point 10; thence S. 72 deg. 52' 24" W. 109.70 feet to point 11; thence N. 71 deg. 09' 36" W. 173.00 feet to point 12; thence N. 84 deg. 18' 36" W. 45.40 feet to point 13; thence S. 68 deg. 45' 20" W. 171.30 feet to point 14; thence N. 43 deg. 35' 34" W. 159.20 feet to point 15; thence S. 67 deg. 47' 03" W. 632.26 feet to point 16; thence N. 22 deg. 12' 57" W. 804.54 feet to point 17; thence N. 68 deg. 30' 19" E. 50.00 feet to point 18; thence N. 22 deg. 12' 58" W. 299.99 feet to point 19 on the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road; thence with the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road N. 68 deg. 30' 19" E. 205.51 feet to point 1, the Place of Beginning, the aforesaid perimeter boundary containing 24.090 acres, more or less. Less and Except the following described 1.88 acre parcel with point references being to the hereinafter described plat: Starting at point 2; thence S. 40 deg. 20' 49" E. 236.02 feet to point A, the Actual Place of Beginning; thence S. 64 deg. 14' 01" E. 110.00 feet to point B; thence S. 44 deg. 56' 31" E. 161.18 feet to point C; thence S. 48 deg. 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to point D; thence S. 62 deg. 38' S0" W. 103.68 feet to point E; thence N. 39 deg. 49' 53" W. 237.30 feet to point F; thence N. 48 deg. 46' 25" E. 276.44 feet to point A; the Actual Place of Beginning and containing 22.21 acres, more or less, as shown on a plat of survey labeled "Exhibit B" entitled Plat of Cunningham Properties, Inc. showing Property to be Rezoned to AR . " prepared by Lumsden and Associates, P.C., dated January 16, 1995. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is 2 directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 lD v'a NORiH ~ ~ Q°~~ ~ °- ~ ~ r . ~\~~e ~ / 31 30 ~ •4 ~` 0 /~// 33 ' ~ 3a ~~ ~.~3a i ~~ „• . ,~ 39_~ It .~u ~ G- " / i .., Se• May 98.00 `\ ~~ ~ ~~ R _r s V.%- ~ p~1~ r i i V i •1~ DEPARZT~NT OF PLANNII~iG AND ZONING :~ ,~. BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC 98.01-2-25; -26; -27; -28 V- ~- PETITIONER: BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND LLC CASE NUMBER: 7-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC to rezone 22.21 acres from I-2 to AR to allow single family dwellings, located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, staff commented as follows: the frontage requirement in the AR district is 110 feet; the industrial zoning has existed for approximately 20 years; a portion of the tract (1.88 acres) will remain I-2 unconditional. The Commission wanted to know why a portion is to remain industrial. Jack Place, attorney, stated that over $200,000 in industrial improvements have been made to the 1.88 acres which will be leased to a pipe line contractor for heavy maintenance use. With regard to the proffered condition, Ms. Scheid summarized the staffs reasoning as to why the proffer cannot be accepted by the County. Mr. Place requested that the condition be withdrawn. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt stated that this proposal would be an improvement to the area and is more in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan. He moved to recommend approval of the petition. Mr. Robinson concurred and said that this is a more appropriate use for the land; however he expressed concern with the remaining industrial site. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other r ;~ Terrance H~mngtbn, Secretary Roanoke bounty Planning Commission V-~ STAFF REPORT Case Number: 7-3/95 Prepared by: Janet Scheid Applicant: Buck Mountain Land, LLC Date: March 7, 1995 PART This request by Buck Mountain Land, LLC to convert 22.21 acres of industrial land to residential purposes has met with the approval of the Roanoke County Economic Development office. The majority of the site has never been developed as industrial and due to the surrounding area, the topography and access the site is not well suited to those purposes. The requested rezoning would be in closer conformance to the County Comprehensive Plan than the existing industrial zoning is. • The property is visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway at approximately Mile Post #123. Traveling south on the Parkway the site is visible, during the winter months, from the eastern side (or left side) of the Parkway. The view of this site will, in all likelihood, be totally screened by existing vegetation during the "leaf on" months. Again, as with the Comprehensive Plan, the requested rezoning is less objectionable than the existing zoning and possibilities. The petitioner has not proffered any conditions on this rezoning. B. DESCRIPTION This is an unconditional request to rezone 22.21 acres of vacant land on Buck Mountain from Industrial (I-2) to Agricultural Residential (AR). This site is a portion of a larger 24.09 acre tract. The residual 1.88 tract is to remain Industrial and is the home to facilities used by the now defunct Virginia Asphalt Company. This property is in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. The AR District allows a wide variety of permitted uses ranging from agricultural to commercial. Residential house types are limited to detached single family dwellings, with minimum lot sizes ranging from one acre to 25,000 square feet (approximately one-half acre) depending on the availability of public utilities. • v-~ 2. Site plan and subdivision review will be required. All roads must be public roads. 3. Entrance must meet VDOT requirements. 4. On-site stormwater management will be required by County ordinance. Historically, there have been drainage problems in this area along Buck Mountain Road. The County staff will need to be particularly cognizant of these problems during site plan review and inspections. • • v- ~ PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - The lot area affected by this request is 22.21 acres. This tract completely surrounds a 1.88 acre tract that the petitioner has not included in this rezoning request, i.e. this 1.88 acre tract will remain I-2. The 22.21 acre tract has one single family house on it. The remainder of this property is undeveloped. The 1.88 acre tract has various buildings that were used for the industrial use including a single-wide trailer. 2. Location - This site is located south of Buck Mountain Road and east of where Buck Mountain Road goes under the Blue Ridge Parkway. The site is bordered on the south by AG-1 zoning and on all other sides by AR zoning. The area is a mix of low density residential single family homes. The site is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area and Magisterial District. 3. Access/Traffic Count - Approximately 3,000 vehicles per day travel Buck Mountain Road between Route 220 and Starkey Road. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Petitioner proposes to build low density single family residential houses. The unproffered concept plan depicts the property subdivided into 29 individual house sites. This results in an approximate gross density of one house every 33,000 square feet. Per the zoning ordinance, since this site currently has access to public water, but not public sewer, the minimum lot size must be 0,000., With public sewer, the minimum lot size could go down to 25,000 square feet. 2. Traffic/Circulation - Access to this site is from Buck Mountain Road. The access point has relatively good sight distance in both directions. The concept plan shows one entrance/exit road that comes to a "T" intersection and branches east and west to cul-de-sacs. If 29 homes were built on this site it would result in approximately 300 additional vehicle trips per day on Buck Mountain Road. • v~ ~- 3. Landscaping/Screeningf Buffering - No additional landscaping would be required. The 1.88 acre tract in the middle of the proposed subdivision, which would remain Industrial, would not be required to install any landscaping due to its pre-existing status. 4. Public Services - Public water is available to this site but public sewer is not. Due to the necessity to cross Blue Ridge Parkway property, a right-of-way permit would need to be obtained from the National Park Service in order to get public sewer to this site. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The discussion of whether or not the request to rezone this property to Agricultural Residential (AR) conforms to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan is made more difficult by the fact that the existing industrial zoning does not conform with the Rural Village designation that applies to this property. If this property is successfully rezoned to AR that zoning will more closely conform to the guidelines of Rural Village. Having said that, the AR zoning and the petitioners submitted concept plan, do not comply with Policy RV-3 which recommends limiting density to less than one unit/acre. In summary, the requested rezoning to AR, if successful, would move this property much closer to being in conformance with the Rural Village designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Development of this property must be in accordance with all Roanoke County subdivision regulations. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff concludes that this proposed development of otherwise undeveloped industrial land complies with the general purposes of the Agricultural Residential zoning district - it would provide low density residential units compatible with the surrounding land uses. While not complying in totality with the guidelines laid out in the Rural Village designation, the proposed rezoning definitely is a move in the right direction when compared to the current situation. • v-~- . This site adjoins Blue Ridge Parkway property and is visible from the Parkway during the winter months. There is a 300' wide screen of mostly deciduous trees on Parkway property, between the Parkway road and the petitioner's site. Therefore, this site will be nearly impossible to see during the heavily traveled months (June through October) of the Parkway. Staff does not recommend any proffers. • • ti '` ~Y n~ ~` r ' "-~' A~L w ~83s • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNI,ti'G AND ZOrti'I~1'G 3738 Brambleton Ave. S1ti' P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ' ea,e re~e~vp~~//A e~~cc dr// 1 _ ~/ .~' /J.~C. '~r.~CLh ~idtt~ placa d issued: ~ CS dace: Case umbar: ^~ ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: ~ ).,.~ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANC V Applicant's name: Buck Mountain Land , LLC Phone: 703-389-3403 . Address: c/o Roger Turner ~ ~ ~~ Zip Code: 24153 800 8th Street, Salem, VA Owner's name: Cunningham Properties, Inc. Phone: 774=4475. Address: c/o J. T. Cunningham, III Zip Code: 24014 401 Wi11okT Oak Drive, S.W., Roanoke, VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 98 01-2-27 ; 98.01-2-26; 98.01-2-28; 98.01-2-25 South of Buck Mountain Road Magisterial District: Cave S rin (Va. Sec. ;Zt. X1679) p g ?~a (~/--~ . ~j , Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel (s}: Existing Zoning: I-2 Industrial District ~?7?.?1 acres Existing Land Use: Approximately 1.88 acres Indus trial Use. Balance sq,f-t, of 22.21 acres unimproved and not in use. :::s:: ~:::::=:: x : ~ `•~: ~.. ~ ~l ..':~7, is ~ ~' ::r .r, is i' i ~ i ~ i E ` i' ~ ~~ i i' i Proposed Zoning: AR Agricultural/Residential District For sra,Y use on~y ~ Proposed Land Use: Low density single family residential dwellings use i ype: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO 1F N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE lS REQUIRED FIP,ST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES ~' NO ... ~ :~~ ~:::::f..:::. :~:::~ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 6E ACCEPTED 1= ANY Or= THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPL~ ii ~. ws v ts.~s v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept p.an Application fee Application %:~`~ Metes and bounds description 'c;:n Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~ Water and sewer application Adjoining propery owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC By: ~E°tiL~~~i..v~wu..v Its: Il'~ew~b~a r~ ' v-~ i ~i S:at.' Use G~~Y' Cese Numoer JtI.STIt=t.GA TlOftil ~r`~R P4:?OPV`I1t u^:df~ ~P.~C1.:L USc: f~R~Ri~~t?~QC.f_~..~T Applicant Buck Mountain Land LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-31 as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The request furthers the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and the AR zoning classification in that it is little more than a request to take cognizance of an already existing situation. The characteristics of the 22.21 acre tract sought to be rezoned to AR and the land surrounding it could not be more aptly described than in Sec. 30-34-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance wherein the "Purpose" of AR areas is defined . Though presently a portion of a 24.090 acre tract zoned I-2, less than 2 acres of that tract has ever been devoted to industrial use. The balance of the acreage which is sought to be rezoned is unimproved, partially wooded land surrounded by similarly unimproved wooded land with a sparse scattering of single family residences; the ',,whole being essentially rural in character now, but with the expectation that it will over time give 'sway to residential development. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Though the property's I-2 zoning might once have been in conformity with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, the property has obviously failed to fulfill even the slightest expectation of development under that zoning category. If one of the aims of the Comprehensive Plan and the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is to put land to its highest and best use, it is respectfully submitted that a re-evaluation is in order. As set forth above, the subject property and that which surrounds it fits to a "T" the defined purpose of AR areas . Moreover, the "Rural Village" concept of low density residential development in rural transition areas is well recognized under the Comprehensive Plan. If nothing else, the history of the development of the area would suggest that the requested AR zoning is more compatible with the Comprehensive Plan than is the current I-2 zoning.. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services a_nd ;acili.ties, including w•aterlsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact of the rezoning on the property itself will of course, convert it from its present fallo~ state into a low density residential area such as is permitted under an AR zoning. As to th impact on adjoining properties it should be minimal in that the use will be compatible, at least wit those adjoining properties whereon residences have been constructed . Obviously any use t which the property is put will impact traffic and public services, but given the low densit restrictions for residences in an AR area that impact should not be too severe; surely no mor than would be generated by a full fledged industrial park which is a permissible use under th present I-2 zoning. The water system will, in fact, be improved in that the developers wi. increase the delivery capacity by enlarging an offsite main. Public sewer is not present) available, but studies are under way to examine the feasibility of providing it by use of a pum station. _ ___ _ _ v \\ _ o ,•_ 9A- ~>rJ 9N/AId l7YMdlY M YN ~~ i i ~~ $~" -•._ ~ ~ ~ 1 /L•/l--CilYO'Y)MY/d YZ /f ~ ~ `ao o \\ B, ~ ~ .Ii4Y/j M7 f/ifW NI/0l79LY // ~ ~c6 ie 1 1 ~ C ~ 'i4 Z V ~ i• °' i 1~1 a ; ~x ~K ., !--_ U a -, c ~ .~ p•,o ' ~ ~, P.. ~ i " art 1 1 ~ / N i i~ / i \ 1 1 1 t _/ g 1 1 z _ _ ~e=~~ \ \. dui ww s 1•~ _~ ~ •,~2=~ ~' \\` ~R\"` ~E / _- Ye8 ~ bit `i/ / W zZZe m~ r o W 1~. Q~ W(Z < 1 ~ '~ ~~ ~ ~~ W N~ \\1'`~ \ ` T ` \ O I ; ~ ~ ~ u o 0 0 ..7s.. \ \.f` ` ~ \ Z i i~ I R (( wOw o f ••\\ \. ~`M1C `\ i W ` ``'~--- ve ' ~ L ~a ~ r h ~amh np w4w~ oo °o I `. \ " a ~ g~j M ~ '= jA~ yw. \\8 ! ' r o a ~l o-In iF~t1 su na 0 1 Vt`~\ \ \ e~~ ~ m~``\~~ yr +ei , ~n s vh~ 1"smz roa '' U - _ `'ff'`~, •~ w\\ A IX ~tcP ~' \ H .n .Fiats .i¢~S ;z 1-~ cnl .at a _ ~ V\ \ ~ 11-•\ . gad: <~ 1 ((uvw(.S acw ~o r7 .~- ~ ~~ l h\ i ~,C ~nwx «( 7(SC Lei z4 (S ! ; -~ • \ \\N `\\ Y ~ J~ <I.. .ACV WOSwO -Wm~C 4< f(.lOa ~ - g ``~ '"` ih ,W ` r 1\ // ~ F'ez ~ .:r3~S~SW sar«"' :_ - I a L `~$ ~~~.~m i~ I .. 1 ~!' \ zozuoumin am a(.aa•.Z. ~i tW-uFF- ~~.~ r, `~ ~. / 2 1 \ o.NmwO 00 (a.a eta p ~„~ 2 I a i - ~- \ ` o e c s- 4F4YW 0 u, o r-1 _~ ~ I I, ! ~.~ l `Z \ N4tZ2NN600 VW7CO Vl~O ~J.^[ r-~ ~1 1 OLWWOOt..w 410mW OaW==.7 i~-1 - 1~1 ~ l~ O ~ I / , \\ ~ 1caa OO Faa iN0040W~ZZF F•-1 • ~O IMI \ ~ i[:JOC00000 WZaY IK~(w.-ip _aI I I~'•yy \ _ ' W FVU66.]64.]C(6F 4NF SZ .] .~ / -_ ~ = 1 i ~ :. 11 1 i I ~1 si ~ ~ ~'Z. o .h. ~ s 4°I ~ ` i i w t ry ; \ , ~l tiz m~0 w U ~ ~o\ \\ `\.. tb Wh0 ( OW ~ ± a a r2.>. F y `\`\ \' Q Z r\~ / I ~C4 O OM U _ e~ \\ \•'~d •\\ \ O~ `\~ C N' K`~MN %I 1 KFL WF F~WW~ \~`~ \ ddYC \\ 6\ ~~~• T / ' ` ~P i , uia. E-m Ommam t-O W~~ 7a~ O . 14 J ~ VI W i f.,J Z W ~p = € _ -IU MF M42tw i.o~~ +~=tee a~.•". I ~/ •~\~ `` 611 ~ r ~ ~ l4loWwzt ~ M >~ ~ ~ T ~'-16i •i ~ hm W ai.4w7 1.\WO m'w )oz rv~ ~ ~Z ~ 1~6~11 \ `L ~°wv'o>g 4e00~i ~0 ~ 4 OH ~•ti 1 0+~ ` r--~ ~, ~ J MaT. 4141 NON ( Y ~y WO r~t2•~ZI M v=;``` ~ !'~M~ «~w `• -~ ~j'!ST` O~0 W FUm~.IF<M(F4.v _..~ Ke ~O,~N =~~~oe j •-~I.Y \~~}w~ i•? P'J' W ~ n n X40• \ `>w~~ AYR ~'=: ~`~ '! C. C 4~W-! ' ~\QQ~ O O Y- J • NORTH • D dal ~ ~ ~i E ' U ~ . r ~~0 W / ~ ~ b 2 1 ~ ~/ 33 ~ ~ 34 _ ` / ~35 •r .~~~ ~~ ~I ~~ 37 ~~ ~~,. 39J ~,,~~• _~u ~i `~ 1 ~ G-~ Se• May 99.00 .«.., y-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 22.21-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3862 BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 98.01- 2-25, 98.01-2-26, 98.01-2-27, 98.01-2-28) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR UPON THE APPLICATION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 22.21 acres, as described herein, and located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Number 98.01-1-25, 98.01-2-26, 98.01-2-27, 98.01-2-28) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at point 1 which lies on the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road (Va. Secondary Rte. 679) and which point constitutes the northwesterly corner of land conveyed to -a John C. and Virgie Donahue (DB 552, page 179) shown as Tax Map No. 88.03-2-57, and the northeasterly corner of Parcel 2 (Tax Map No. 98.01-2-27) described in deed from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr. to Virginia Asphalt Paving Company of record in Deed Book 1145, at page 312; thence leaving Buck Mountain Road, the following courses and distances: S. 45 deg. 18' 34" E. 207.57 feet to point 2; thence N. 62 deg. 06' 40" E. 154.55 feet to point 3; thence N. 59 deg. 54' 20" E. 70.99 feet to point 4; thence N. 72 deg. 39' 40" E. 84.55 feet to point 5; thence S. 32 deg. 16' 38" E. 687.20 feet to point 6; thence N. 71 deg. 13' 28" E. 371.20 feet to point 7; thence N. 73 deg. 20' 44" E. 478.39 feet to point 8; thence S. 16 deg. 39' 16" E. 155.51 feet to point 9; thence S. 32 deg. 22' 06" W. 558.93 feet to point 10; thence S. 72 deg. 52' 24" W. 109.70 feet to point 11; thence N. 71 deg. 09' 36" W. 173.00 feet to point 12; thence N. 84 deg. 18' 36" W. 45.40 feet to point 13; thence S. 68 deg. 45' 20" W. 171.30 feet to point 14; thence N. 43 deg. 35' 34" W. 159.20 feet to point 15; thence S. 67 deg. 47' 03" W. 632.26 feet to point 16; thence N. 22 deg. 12' 57" W. 804.54 feet to point 17; thence N. 68 deg. 30' 19" E. 50.00 feet to point 18; thence N. 22 deg. 12' S8" W. 299.99 feet to point 19 on the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road; thence with the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road N. 68 deg. 30' 19" E. 205.51 feet to point 1, the Place of Beginning, the aforesaid perimeter boundary containing 24.090 acres, more or less. Less and Except the following described 1.88 acre parcel with point references being to the hereinafter described plat: Starting at point 2; thence S. 40 deg. 20' 49" E. 236.02 feet to point A, the Actual Place of Beginning; thence S. 64 deg. 14' O1" E. 110.00 feet to point B; thence S. 44 deg. 56' 31" E. 161.18 feet to point C; thence S. 48 deg. 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to point D; thence S. 62 deg. 38' 50" W. 103.68 feet to point E; thence N. 39 deg. 49' 53" W. 237.30 feet to point F; thence N. 48 deg. 46' 25" E. 276.44 feet to point A; the Actual Place of Beginning and containing 22.21 acres, more or less, as shown on a plat of survey labeled "Exhibit B" entitled Plat of Cunningham Properties, Inc. showing Property to be Rezoned to AR . " prepared by Lumsden and Associates, P.C., dated January 16, 1995. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. ~y::~>:y::>:::.:i:i'.+:::`?%~+'•: ";:t'<%y.,::;::;::;:;::::.:::.::ii::;:~::};:~: ;•::;:;t;'::•:;:;:•:;:;~::~:; r:,.;:;:j:::::j~.::>::i:::.:::>~:;{:::::;::isi<.y»~;:c.;::%j•.:.i:::'r.::i'::>...:>::.:::: i14s-ii ~i~:~~4.~::::::~~~:::~(i.:SR`ffis9•:~:::::::'~i!:J::::::::::V!/i1i::iii:ii~~rt:lr:~i~':~ii::::':~i~':7~Y.::::::::di:~i~':::lt~~ :: ~:::::::.F::.~:::::::: ~::::::: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE 32895-8 AMENDING PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 1.864-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) LOCATED AT 1806 AND 1812 THOMPSON MEMORIAL DRIVE IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ~1 ~, (REMOVAL OF PROFFERED CONDI- TIONS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF EVERETT J. MILES, SR. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to B-3 with proffered conditions in 1988; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing were held on March 28, 1995; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.864 acres (TAX MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) and located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Everette J. Miles, Sr. 1 L v -- ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE 32895-8 AMENDING PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 1.864-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) LOCATED AT 1806 AND 1812 THOMPSON MEMORIAL DRIVE IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, {REMOVAL OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF EVERETT J. MILES, SR. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to B-3 with proffered conditions in 1988; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing were held on March 28, 1995; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.864 acres (TAX MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) and located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Everette J. Miles, Sr. 1 r 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby removes as follows: 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 .~ 3~~ ~ • Cam Oan F1 o .~~ ~ ?p / 2"~ 4 •~ / Carawea ~ STATION ~ • .. c 0 ti°~~ow . . ~ I 0.. ~3% °c ~ ~• . _ Paw ER =~ ~Q~~'~RE ~ I X1200 3~ . ~~ ~~`P „ ^_ ~vooos ~„'~~ ~~' E ~ E r 4 ~R ~ M ~ E ~° QQ ~ s ~ Nv w e UAEL o Stip1 ~~~_1)w ~ ~~, ~ 'VICINITY MAP s'~ `°~ Qt. .~ DEPARTPg.NT OF PL~ANi~JINGL AND ZONING ~ V-3 NORTH EVERETT J. MILES SR. 36.01-2-3 v- 3 PETITIONER: EVERETT J. MILES SR. CASE NUMBER: 8-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Everett J. Miles Sr. to rezone 1.864 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to allow general retail sales, located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if it is possible for the applicant to access this property from Route 311 and if the cinder block apartment building is part of the acreage, is it habitable and would it be allowed. Staff responded as follows: a VDOT commercial entrance would be required but doubted that VDOT would allow it; the building presently exists as a nonconforming use if it is being used. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other t ~. ; Terrance Harrx~gton, S~eMary Roanoke CQnnty Planrd"ng Commission STAFF' REPORT ~- 3 PETITIONER: Everette J. Miles, Sr. CASE NUMBER: 8-3/95 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED BY: David Holladay DATE: l~iarch 7, 1995 This is a request to rezone 1.864 acres from C2 Conditional to C2 to allow general retail sales. A mixture of commercial, residential and vacant land uses characterize the area. Retail sales and service activities are consistent with the Core land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Everette J. Miles, Sr, to remove proffered conditions on a portion of 1.864 acres of commercial property, located at 1806 & 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner wishes to lease retail space to a prospective tenant for use as an equestrian tack shop. The site was conditionally rezoned on 1/26/88 from B-2 to B-3, with the following proffered conditions: 1) Use of the property will be limited to used automobile sales. 2) No outside overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 3) No on-premises automobile repairs shall be conducted. 4) Existing entrance west of Hanging Rock Market (facing VA 311) shall provide only means of access to this business. 5) Maximum signage size to be 4' X 8'. No portable signs permitted. 6) No more than 20 vehicles on site. Some confusion exists about the size of the portion which contains the proffered conditions. In the final order from the Board of Supervisors, following approval of the conditional rezoning on 1/26/88, the portion of the property was described as .25 acres, followed by a legal description which describes a .095 acre parcel, followed by the proffer of conditions statement which describes a .18 acre parcel. Due to this inconsistency, staff suggests that the Planning Commission address this petition as a request to remove any and all proffers from any and all portions of the 1.864 acre tract located at 1806 & 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Tax Map #36.01-2-3. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The C2 district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Petitioner has not proffered to limit use on this site to any particular permitted use. • No new commercial entrance permit requirement from Virginia Department of Transportation is anticipated considering owner's intention to use existing entrance. PART II ~r3 • A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CO\TDITIONS Location -The site is a 1.864 acre pazcel at 1806 & 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive. The site is in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. The site is currently serviced by public water and private sewerage systems. Sewer service is not available in the vicinity. Topography/Vegetation -All buildings and parking areas are on level grade. Steep slopes adjoin rear yards of the existing buildings. Ground cover is mostly existing asphalt and gravel. Rear yards of both existing buildings consist of grass, shrubs and small evergreen and deciduous trees. In years past, soil from the steep slopes in the rear of the site and adjacent property has been excavated and sold for fill material. Surrounding Neighborhood -The acreage without proffered conditions at 1806 & 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive is zoned C2 and contains the Hanging Rock Grocery and gas pumps, plus the Valley Western Shop. Adjacent property to the north and northwest is zoned C2 and is part of the excavated area mentioned above. Adjacent property to the southwest on Thompson Memorial Drive is zoned C2 and contains a restaurant. Beyond this property to the southwest lies the Laurel Woods subdivision. Property to the south, across Thompson Memorial Drive, is zoned C2 and is vacant woodland. Property to the southeast, across Thompson Memorial Drive, is zoned C2 and contains a grocery store/gas station and some retail use. • B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - No new structures or site improvements are proposed. Two buildings exist on the site. The smaller structure lies within the C2C portion, and has offices for the used car dealership. The larger structure lies within the C2 portion, and contains the grocery and retail space. The front yazds and most of the side yazds are covered with asphalt or gravel from the buildings to the property lines. Access -Access from Route 311 (Thompson Memorial Drive) is shared for all businesses at the site. Traffic Generation/Circulation - 1993 twenty-four hour traffic counts ,for the vicinity were as follows: Rt 311 from Salem north corporate limits to Rt 419.- 13,000 Rt 419 from I-81 to Rt 311 - 15,000 Rt 311 from Rt 419 to Rt 779 - 11,000 Fire Rescue/Utilities -Removal of the proffered conditions will not affect fire and rescue operations. Response time to the area is approximately five minutes. The site is serviced by public water, including a fire hydrant along the street frontage. Public sewer is not available in the vicinity. V'~ C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is in the Core land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. This designation delineates centralized locations that are suited for a mix of high intensity urban uses. The Core designation delineates suburban centers that provide a focus of activity and identity to surrounding communities and that compliment the central business districts of downtown Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. The petitioner's request conforms with Policy C-1 (encourage intensive mixed-use urban development in designated core areas), Policy C-2 (core area is served by an arterial or higher grade street), and portions of Policy C-4 (coordinate the design of commercial sites) -vehicular access is shared with the adjacent Hanging Rock Market, and site to site access is available to other businesses on the north side of Rt 311. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed use of the site by Valley Western Shop for retail sales is allowed as a use by right, without additional use and design standards, in the C2 zoning district. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petition to remove all existing proffers from the property is generally consistent with the Core designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed retail use currently exists in retail space on the opposite side of the Hanging Rock Market. The petitioner wishes to remove the existing proffers so that the tenant could relocate their retail business to the site. Considering existing site development and size of available rental space at the site (approximately 600 square feet), no negative traffic or land use impacts are expected. Staff recommends no proffers. . 'Y A ~~ L 2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 O ~ For staff use only ~ ~~ ~ '~ date receiv eeived by: ~~ application fee: ~ PC/BZ ate: placards issued: BOS date• Case Number: / ~. • Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: C/~r+' ~ ~ ~i/~r-S -S'/: ~ Phone:.~~ 7.. [%~3'i~ Address: ~ ~l ~.•- flic I~.S'rN Mir), ~ >2 ~ ~ an~drr- !~ Zip Code: o l y Owner's name: ~•v['rt~7"r ~~~ 1r'!l L°~ Srt' Phone:3~7- G~~ Address: Zip Code: Location of property: - ^/~' '~~ C ~> Tax Map Number: ,~~, o I - ~ - 3 a rl / ~~ ~n~ns~K ~''~r~~ ~~ a-~/~l`~ ~~~~~ <ff 1 / Magisterial District: Cfc~T~GUdc2 y Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C'=~-'e 59;:~i k "~~~ S acres Existin Land Use: a g ~~''°~cT C4~-/'~ ~~ 19~~•3 Ss~, F'f. sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: ~l!~ f~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~--~r ~ s-a /~ s ( ............................. Foi Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: , i ~c~4'r~~d'~ /S 7`Ci /?c'~ ve ;~1. C'o~lvJ%7tit,fs. AA Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO . ....................................................................................... ....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs v ws v rvs v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application K::.:. Metes and bounds description ~~:~ Proffers, if applicable - Justification ~"`... Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner f h r ' o t e p operty or the owner s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the owner. c Owner's Signature: _ nG~~~-- ~~,{~~~ ~., ~~ W • ". - "--~?EM.a/~(//hlG P.PC~PcQTY OF JAMES .Q. PN/LL/P-7 ----~ D.,C3.r585,P.~'7z ~t Pi,~/ -- - - ~PG/ 300.00 SE 0p~ ~.~Q °; ~o }~ ~ Q ~ Wp m~ Pig/ ~~ W ~~ ~~~~ J ~ ~ ( /. 8 ~ 4 Ac~eEs o ~ i D O p ~Ot ~~ ~~W ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Z•STr C/NOEQBLx,r I ~i?oARTME~/T fr'OV.3C 5 Q. 7 s. o ry, a N --50 = ~ ~ 224.56 -+~44'DO'W .~-To ~At Eiy VA. .QOU TE No. 3// KES~Ea .VEN/ Li~/ES Z v~.~- . .o q ' k oi~/ se -r PO Qo M~~`' sUQ/EY FOR v~ ~ •~ ~. ~ Or P 8 JACK G ~c;S •r~~y j t ND SUkVEY1~3R y o`T ~-n ~ CERTIFICATE No. ~'~ `~.. f 1070 i ... ~V_LANh ~. .~~1 /ii1E5 .Q ~H/L L /~S OF A /.8~ 4 ACRE T.PAC T ,OE'/A/G COQ/ vE YE O - TD EVE.rIETT J~4Ck..`~O/V M/LES S/TU-4TE AT HANG/~t/G QOCf~ /~t/ QOA NO.~E COON T Ste, V QG/N/A SCALE: /"s 5D' OEC. S, /`773 l3 y : - JAC/l 6. ~3E5 S CGrRT/F/EO LA.t/O .SUQ/EyO•P ~~ ~0 N~ ti~ } T ~6~ ~ /-Sro~er C.~oeaecoc.~ I I .$.rCO ~TOIE,Gw4AGL~0if/Gi I 9 .I i.eo.~ j~ ~ I~ ~ ` ~ ~lv N. ~EG.,s o~MP 0, 5 ' o! h~0 I cs. !a..~ • . ~ ~+ s ~ Ai .1362 '" ~\ o~ .9'1),, ~~ CarawBA Cam ~p ~ ~^' STATION DarttHa o.. 4 ~'~j hcitow g~ pt ~ ~• ~ ~~ r~ KY~ ARE ~OS ~ NH ~P~c~' !] '_' ~Q 1 4v~~ ~ H f ~~ QQ ~ ~ '? ~ ~,~ LAINV W oe ~ a<%~ ~ - -- - ~ ~ ,.~..°. _.~~' _1 ~ VICINITY MAPS e~~~ `'°~ o v-3 NORiH ~ \ ~.. Ys xoo ~.,ay ad ~: w o / ~ \\cC ~7^ 10 Q ` ~w ,C ~ ~ D•`i~ J ~ ~ ~C ~'' ~ ~~~ ~ Soo Yoh X 07 till IFS r . ~ i p~• \ ~\ ` ` / ` 1/~' LOOM q \\ C \ ` s .% \ \ 1` \ ~ ' ~!~ I Ida R \ ~~ `- 12a M 171 21004 101 1 X41c ICI ~( c2 ~ ` _ • 1 ,..,~. ,,~. G'~ I a>.Y c to z«r,o ~ R _2 ~ ~ C 9 t 22{4 2GLe ~ ~ /9 21fr Q^ ~ I ~il~ ~rri I T ` SSSM / G ~ /Sw clay xq ~ Lace 11~ /7pp 4e1« + / !NI a as ' ~• y ~ ~ o ti zliw nur iii.. ~~~ / \ \ l 1 y'+ t zs ,. 2t _ ~ WY / / \~. `~ \\ \ i • ' iu4 ` 2i • (~' !oo Yoe li.q I \A ` ~\ \\ 2.Se4 / $ M• 100' T ` - I ~~ ~ \ 1 ~ \ ~ 0~+• - Y Y p • \ ICI `e/ 1 ` +21eY~~ ~ \ ~ \ `~ I \ \ aka ` ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. -. 1 ;\ ~ 0` 1 ~~ , ~ ti ~~ \~ • ~* DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING EVERETT Ja MILES SRa -' AND ZONING 36.01-2-3 •1. r r- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 1.864-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP NO. 36.01- 2-3) LOCATED AT 1806 AND 1812 THOMPSON MEMORIAL DRIVE IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSI- FICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICA- TION OF C-1, (REMOVAL OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF EVERETT J. MILER, 8R. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to B-3 with proffered conditions in 1988; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995; and the second reading and public hearing were held on March 28, 1995; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.864 acres (TAX MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) and located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Everette J. Miles, Sr. 1 v-~ 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby removes as follows: 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. c:\wp5 ] \agenda\zoning\miles 2 PETITIONER: JEFFREY & LAURA MARONIC CASE NUMBER: 9-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Jeffrey & Laura Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow single family attached and detached dwellings, located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Will Estes voiced concern with additional traffic on an already hazardous route. He presented a petition containing approximately 100 signatures of concerned citizens who are opposed to the project. Mr. Thomason asked about data that Mr. Estes received from the Utility Department. A report dated January 1995, indicated several sewer system interceptor overflow locations (Mudlick). John Stokes expressed appreciation to the staff of the Planning Department for providing him with assistance and information relating to the project. He commented as follows: after traffic lights were installed at 419 and 221, the traffic has greatly increased and our neighborhood has become a shortcut; the additional driveways being proposed create a very hazardous situation; we know that development will occur but we prefer that this property remain R-1. Bob Williams raised the following concerns: there may be a larger plan than what is proposed; decrease in property values; traffic flow patterns. Keith Zillifro said that the information being presented tonight is new and asked that the Commission delay its decision until we have a chance to consider it. He stated that he would prefer to see single family units on the property; townhouses do not retain their value. Elsie Persinger expressed concern with the increased traffic and flooding. Chad Tilley stated this project would further compound the overcrowding of our schools. Bob Neal inquired about the size and design of the buildings. He expressed concern with the private road. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about entrances to the property, future road improvements, and proposed density. Staff commented as follows: VDOT has expressed concern with turning movements near the intersection of Old Cave Spring Road and Cave Spring Lane; Old Cave Spring Road is included on the current Six-Year Road Construction Plan; several additional single family lots over and above what is shown on the concept plan could be created under R-1 zoning. Jack Ellinwood, engineer with Balzer & Associates, said there are problems with gaining access across the floodway coming off of Old Cave Spring Road; with this plan, we've reduced the number of entrances onto Cave Spring Lane by offering the private drive. ~-y The Commission asked about the maintenance of the stormwater detention pond. Carr Kinder, attorney, said that it will be maintained by the homeowners' association along with the private road. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The rezoned parcel will be used for the development of a residential subdivision containing five single family detached lots and four single family attached lots and petitioners will not petition this board to amend the rezoning to allow for multifamily use. 2) The development of the parcel will be in substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with the application for rezoning, reserving only the right to relocate the private roadway to conform to requirements imposed by VDOT. 3) A homeowners' association will be established to provide for the maintenance of the private road serving the single family attached lots and the stormwater management area. 4) The said parcel will be developed in conformity with R-1, low density residential district, with the exception that the single family attached lots will be served by a 25-foot private road instead of a public road. 5) The single family detached lots will be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,800 square feet and the single family attached lots will be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,450 square feet plus a garage. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason said that the proposal appears to be amicable to all. However, I do not like the entrances onto Cave Spring Lane but this is something that the developer will have to work out with VDOT. He moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. Mr. Witt remarked that the area is designated Development which encourages more intense development than Neighborhood Conservation and I think it complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~.~ ,- ., /~ `" Terrance Hamngton, Secxetary~`~ Roanoke County Plann~ng Commission V-'+ JEFFREY S. AND LAURA J. MARONIC Re: Petition for Rezoning METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BEGINNING at a paint on the westerly side of Old Cave Spring Road (Route 1663) and the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652) as it intersects; thence with the westerly line of Old Cave Spring Road and with a curve to the left with a chord bearing and distance of S. 10 deg. 12' 00" W. 246.29 feet and an arc distance of 246.59 feet to a point] thence S. 05 deg. 21' 11" W. 111.38 feet to a point an the northerly line of property now or formerly of William Hancock (Tax No. 76.20-3-6}; thence leaving Old Cave Spring Road and with Hancock line S. 80 deg. 15' 00" W. 359.02 feet to a post; thence S. 10. deg. 41' 21" E. 96.78 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 04' 31'" W. 50.39 feet to a. point .on the easterly line of property now or formerly of R. J. Birkenmaier (Tax No. 76.20- 3-9); thence with the Birkenmaier line N. 32 deg. 00 ' 00" W. 293.56 feet to a point on the southerly line of property now or formerly of J. S. Maronic (Tax No. 76.20-3-8); thence with the Maronic line N. 78 deg. 20' 0@" E. 52.30 feet to a paint] thence N. 11 deg. 12' 30" W. 137.87 feet to a paint on the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652)1 thence with Cave Spring Lane N. 79 deg. 47' 08" E. 89.54 feet to a point; thence N. 75 deg. 43' 30" E. 472.02 feet to a point; thence S. 84 deg. 18' 49" E. 23.53 feet to the paint and place of BEGINNING, and containing 4.068 acres as shown on a survey for Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic dated December 27, 1993 and made by Halzer & Associates, Engineers and Surveyors, ~• - STAFF REPORT `~ '~ PETITIONER: JEFFREY ~ LAURA MARONIC PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD CASE NUMBER: 9-3/95 DATE: MARCH 7, 1995 PART I A. EXECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION 4 Petition of Jeffrey & Laura Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow single family attached and detached dwellings, located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The petitioners have proffered substantial compliance with the concept plan reserving the right to relocate the private roadway per VDOT requirements. The proffered concept plan indicates five single family detached and four single family attached lots. Lastly, petitioners have proffered the establishment of a homeowners' association which will maintain the private road serving the single family attached lots and a stormwater management area. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Single family detached development is permitted by right in all agricultural and residential zones excluding R-MH. Single family attached development is permitted by right in R-1, R- 2, R-3, R-4, and AV zones. The petitioners' proposal calls for a private road which is not allowed in R-1 but is permitted for proposed lots of record platted for single family attached development within R-3 and R-4 districts. Single family attached units are defined as two single family dwellings sharing a common wall each on its own individual lot. Use and design standards within a common development containing at least three acres allow the minimum lot size, frontage, and front and rear yard setbacks to be reduced if the lot adjoins a minimum type C buffer yard or if the lot is interior and does not adjoin a lot outside of the common development designated for attached single family dwellings. In addition to this requirement, the minimum side yard opposite the common lot line between two attached dwellings must be at least 10 feet wide and a copy of the plat approved by the County Subdivision Agent shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator who shall note the specific lots approved for single family attached dwellings on the official zoning map. The southeast portion of the site lies within a designated floodway and/or 100-Year Floodplain and must conform to applicable federal and local requirements. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans must be reviewed and approved by County staff before a building permit is issued. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF -EXISTING CONDfiIONS v-y 2 Location -The subject tract occupies with southwest quadrant of the Old Cave Spring Road (VA 1663)/Cave Spring Lane (VA 1652) intersection. Public road frontage includes 358 feet on VA 1663 and 404 feet along VA 1652. The site is in the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area and Magisterial District. Urban services are available. FloodplainlTopographyNe etation -Although containing a single family residence and a detached garage/dwelling, the property is largely undeveloped. Floodway and floodplain areas parallel the east boundary along Old Cave Spring Road. Most of the remainder of the site rises moderately westward and includes a substantial amount of mature evergreen and deciduous trees. The owner intends to remove all existing buildings. Surroundin Neighborhood -The petitioners' property is zoned R-1. Vacant R-1 zoned property lies south. Developed R-1 tracts border the site on the west. Occupied R-1 and R-3 zoned parcels lie north across Cave Spring Lane, including the historical Gale house, recommended for acceptance on the National Register of Historic Places. East across Old Cave Spring Road, office commercial and one single family residential uses exist, all zoned C-2. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The petitioners propose to construct five, ± 2,400 square foot single family detached dwellings with individual driveways from Cave Spring Lane and four single family attached units each with a garage (building total ± 1,800 square feet), all accessed by one private drive proposed approximately 80 feet west of the Old Cave Spring Road/Cave Spring Lane intersection. The attached units are intended to have grass courtyards or patios at the front, exterior corners of the dwellings and decks at the rear of the buildings. The attached units are intended to be one story, but may also include a room over the garage. A stormwater management basin is also indicated on the proffered concept plan. The proposal's overall density would be 2.2 units per acre. Traffic Generation/Circulation - 1986 Average daily traffic stood at 2,002 vehicles for Old Cave Spring Road and 1,468 vehicles for Cave Spring Lane. No more recent figures are available. All residences combined are expected to generate approximately 80 trips per day (10 for each single family detached dwelling; 7-8 for each single family attached unit). Nine accidents were reported at the Old Cave Spring Road/Cave Spring Lane intersection from 1990 to 1994. The private drive proposed for the attached homes would be platted as a 25 foot access and utility easement and must be constructed at a minimum width of 18 feet and would be paved. The detached units' final driveway locations will be determined by VDOT. Additionally, VDOT has expressed concern with the private road's proposed location off Cave Spring Lane due to potential traffic hazards for turning vehicles and its proximity to the Old Cave Spring Road/Cave Spring Lane intersection. Further this location may be affected by scheduled improvements to Old Cave Spring Road per VDOT's Six-year Secondary Road Construction Plan. Environment -The site lies within a small portion of the overall Mudlick Creek watershed (total: approximately 4,500 acres) and includes floodway territory which cannot be encroached upon by any type of development. Most of the stormwater management pond and portions of the private access road will be situated within the 100-Year Floodplain; all residences are proposed above the 100-Year Flood level. The VA Department of Forestry has recommended that pulpwood and firewood trees on-site be harvested in lieu of landfilling. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Emergency vehicle travel time is within acceptable limits (less than four minutes). Several residents of the surrounding area have advised the staff of sanitary sewer deficiencies in the general area, however staff has been advised by the county Utility Department that existing sanitary sewer, public water and fire flow are sufficient to serve the proposed project. C. CONFORMANCE WfTH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN The subject property is designated Development by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This designation encourages low-middle density residential development (1 to 3 units per acre per Comprehensive Plan; 2.2 proposed). The proposal complies with policies D-1 (manage the rate, location, and amount of new residential growth according to capacity and availability of public services and facilities) and D-2 (encourage innovation in residential land development and building design). Policy D-8 permits attached residential development provided exceptional housing design and site planning techniques are employed to achieve compatibility. At the time of report preparation, staff had not had the opportunity to review housing design for compliance with this policy. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Site and building plans, erosion and sediment control, stormwater management, and a flood study must be reviewed and approved. With possible minor modifications, the proposal can comply with the zoning ordinance and its accompanying standards. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The density proffered readily complies with both Development and Neighborhood Conservation guidelines designated by the Comprehensive Plan. Care must be exercised in dealing with a large percentage of flood hazard area contained within the 4.068 acre site. Although not a high traffic generator, the project will include five additional driveways and a private road emptying into a busy local collector street system. This is less than the number of driveways that are permitted by right if the property was developed to the maximum density allowed by R-1 zoning. w~~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARA OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of a 4.Ob8 acre parcel of land, generally located on the west side of Old Cave Spring Road. S.W. and the south side of Cave Spring Lane, S.W., within the Nindsor Hills Magisterial District and recorded se Parcel 76.20-3-? an the Roanoke County Tax Records. SECOND AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS To: The Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County The Petitioners, Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic, hereby voluntarily proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following amended conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land pursuant to their agreements at the hearing before the Planning Commission: 1) The rezoned parcel will be used for the development of a residential subdivision containing five (5) single family detached lots and four (4) single family attached lots and Petitioners will not petition thXS Board to amend the rezoning to allow for multi-family use. 2) The development of the parcel will be in substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with the application for rezoning, reserving only the right to relocate the private roadway to conrorm to requirements imposed by the Virgiia Aepartment of Transportation. 3) A homeowners association will be established to provide for the maintenance of the private road serving the single family attached lots and the stormwater management area. 4) The said parcel will be developed i.z~ conformity with R-1, Low Density Residential District, with the exception that the Single Family Attached lots will be served by a 25-foot private road instead of a public road. 5) The Single Family Detached lass will. be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,800 square feet and the Single Family Attached lots will be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,450 square feet plus a garage. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY S. MARONIC Z O a AI tf LEI 3 3 f1 H Z[ 3 Q t.T i 73 Q 2I I S M 7nib' T 2 O I 5 6 ' 6 0 '~ O • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ~/'' ~ For staff use only ~ ~~ G date receiv ecq ~ ap a ' f ~~ //BZA date. placar s issued: ~~ BOS dat Case Number: ~~ _2 ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): C] REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Jeffrey S. and Laura J. Maronic ~J Phone: 772-2727 Address: 4932 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. , Roanoke, Virginia / ~ ~~ip e: 24018 i Owner's name: Jeffrey S. and Laura J. Maronic Phone: 772-2727 Address: 3377 Forest Court, Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24018 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 76.20-3-7 Fronting on Old Cave Spring Road , S.W. , and Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Magisterial District: Windsor Hi11s t{~a~ ~~`~' L,N, Community Planning Area: Windsor Hills Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R - 1 Low Density Residential District 4.068 acres Existing Land Use: Residential Rental, Single Family sq.ft. ~ . • ... ' Proposed Zoning: R - 3 . . .. Proposed Land Use: Medium Density Multi-family Residential District For staff Use Only Use Type: 5 single family Lots and 4 single family dwellings attached Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. x Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. x If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: None , i Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 8E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v x Consultation x 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan x Application fee x Application x ~~~ ;. Metes and bounds description x '<;« Proffers, if applicable - x Justification x ~ Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with t_he know/edge and consent of the owner. Jef~~f,~'ey S. M~ron'c and Luar.a J. Maronic by: Owner's Signature: /A.r.C,~ ,t ;~,,~/~ ,~, Carr L. Kinder, ., o Counsel For Staff Use On/y: Case Numbcr M ~~ Applicant Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. l+ provides for a residential development of land that would otherwise lie dormant; it clearly facilitates the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community-- providing for reasonable and compatible use of land that would otherwise not be useable to the drainage and flood zone of the genearl area. When the proffered conditions are considered, it complies with uses which would be, allowed in R - 1 District. The only deviation being a private road. The Low Density of 1 to 3 units per acre is being maintained. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The property is in either an urban development or urban conservation area. The use for which it is planned is consistent with urban conservation area. Additionally, the location of the single family attached lots is next to an area which is in actuality transitional - Commercial along Brambleton Avenue. It is a natural use for this area. But for the proposed private road, this development could be placed in the current R - 1 Zoning. • Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. As to the impact on the property, it will have no more impact.than development as now zoned. Actually, the impact would be worse if a regular public street were required. The development as proposed includes a storm water management pond, which will greatly improve the drainage problem along Old Cave Spring Raad. There will be no impact whatsoever on adjoining properties. There will be single family dwellings on the five lots fronting on Cave Spring Lane, S.W.. There will be a Class C Buffer lot between the single family attached lot and the lot to the west. A11 adjoining .properties on the east side of OLd Cave Spring Road are zoned commercial. Again, the only difference between the current zoning (R - 1) and the requested zoning (R - 3) is the use of a private road to service the single family attached lots,which is actually dictated by the drainage problems next to-Old Cave Spring Road. V-4 C L__J VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROA1V'OKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of a 4.068 acre parcel of ) land, generally located on the west ) side of Old Cave Spring Road, S.W. ) and the south side of Cave Spring ) PETITION Lane, S.W., within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District and recorded ) as Parcel 76.20-3-7 on the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) To: The Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County WHEREAS, your petitioners, Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic, respectfully file this Petition pursuant to §§30-14, et seq., of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended: 1 ) Petitioners are the owners of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is currently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1, Low Density Residential District. 3) The property is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioners desire to have this property rezoned as R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District for the purpose of developing a single family subdivision containing detached and attached single family dwellings, .with the attached single family dwellings being served by a private road, subject to proffered conditions. • WHEREFORE, your Petitioners respectfully request that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set forth in Paragraph 4 above. FURTHER, your Petitioners respectfully request that this Petition be referred to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. • l~ u • -. Q y ~ M V ~~ ~ Q ~ W Z b ~~ ~~ ~h 0 V v v ci ~+ Q Q Q ;Q~ ON,~ O W oN~ c,4 Q W p~ v e ~ o ~ o h 2 `i :~ Q a°~ ~QMpN RpBE~` 4~"31p'12 ' ~. 0 Z p~E' K~ -. `s r ~ O~W _. - ~ -- ~,, Ne' ~ , 7y ~'hl ~l 4 ~ ~-J -. ~ Od~~ `~ 2J Si~dnF7 ~~ M ~ ~\VS J 3~, I bN ~i OLr ga zre ea ~'~~~ ~ by . yl~ ~Z~ ' ~~ ,09°„~ :~~vx, _V Z U Q _ Q ~ ~ y Q ~ O Z Q ~ Q Q Q ¢ Q ~ fD 'a ~ / ~ "MM~1 'i ~ > UI a1 °' p a Q Z N Q7 ~ 2 ~7 } ~ W N ~ '~ J o ~ o = -~ a ~ ¢ a Z ~ m Q o O Z W z 3 3 ~~ I~ /~' I '~ ' ' - 'l I '~d'~3N01r ~ Fnh al e,..~,.,,, ~~~.y~o~~~ yy,f_2\ iYy~~ 7'ddst01 oyl~ l I i I _` ,~ I -- - ~ IJ ~ ~ ;~ k-- ~ ~, ~ ~oQ ~ Qq~ o I ~ ~~ ~ J ~3N w ~;° 2 , ,,~~_- `~~ , ~ + ,i 1 ~ I _, - - ~ iW' .Z. I ,' ~ ~~9 ~O/// .a ° N ~~, , _ 3 aaoc N _ a M ~ ~ lO~ ~ kl n~ ~`~~ H a ~/! :~~ ~, - ~ ~il ~"`~~ ~ w a U ~~ IIIII~ ll~ ' i `? U ~ f; ~ ( dd 2 F L ~ ~ ~~lli ~ ~ ~, , ~ ~ r~ O ~'~~h ~v I l - GF,~I U ,1,,,~` ; - o ~Ll.frlj rw ``VV ~' 1 N rl ~ ry~,~ B ~ZH ~ JI ~~w~ ~~~----E .F / ~ I. ~i $ R ~~ M ~ ~ I ~ W q t ,Q ~i I V ~ N ~ '` is "- i~ oM 4 w it O N lV a ~ ~ ti ~h°N I ~ yT 22 ~7 N~~Z ~,g~~ ~; W v-y Ov~~~~ NORTH •y .~. DEPARZMEN'T OF PLANNIIv'G AND ZOAIING JEFFREY ~ LAURA MARONIC 76.20-3-7 t V-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.068-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4824 CAVE SPRING LANE (TAX MAP NO. 76.20-3- 7) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JEFFREY AND LAIIRA MARONIC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.068 acres, as described herein, and located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, (Tax Map Number 76.20-3-7) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Residential District. Medium Density Multi-Family 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1 .- vy (1) The rezoned parcel will be used for the development of a residential subdivision containing five single family detached lots and four single family attached lots and petitioners will not petition this board to amend the rezoning to allow for multifamily use. (2) The development of the parcel will be in substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with the application for rezoning, reserving only the right to relocate the private roadway to conform to requirements imposed by VDOT. (3) A homeowners' association will be established to provide for the maintenance of the private road serving the single family attached lots and the stormwater management area. (4) The said parcel will be developed in conformity with R-1, low density residential district, with the exception that the single family attached lots will be served by a 25- foot private road instead of a public road. (5) The single family detached lots will be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,800 square feet and the single family attached lots will be developed with houses containing a minimum finished floor area of 1,450 square feet plus a garage. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Old Cave Spring Road (Route 1663) and the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652) as it intersects; thence with the westerly line of Old Cave Spring Road and with a curve to the left with a 2 v-y chord bearing and distance of S. 10 deg. 12' 00" W. 246.29 feet and an arc distance of 246.59 feet to a point; thence S. 05 deg. 21' 11" W. 111.38 feet to a point on the northerly line of property now or formerly of William Hancock (Tax No. 76.20-3-6); thence leaving Old Cave Spring Road and with Hancock line S. 80 deg. 15' 00" W. 359.02 feet to a post; thence S. 10 deg. 41' 21" E. 96.78 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 04' 31" W. 50.39 feet to a point on the easterly line of property now or formerly of R. J. Birkenmaier (Tax No. 76.20-3-9); thence with the Birkenmaier line N. 32 deg. 00' 00" W. 293.56 feet to a point on the southerly line of property now or formerly of J. S. Maronic (Tax No. 76.20-3-8); thence with the Maronic line N. 78 deg. 20' 00" E. 52.30 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 12' 30" W. 137.87 feet to a point on the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652); thence with Cave Spring Lane N. 79 deg. 47' 08" E. 89.54 feet to a point; thence N. 75 deg. 43' 30" E. 472.02 feet to a point; thence S. 84 deg. 18' 49" E. 23.53 feet to the point and place of beginning, and containing 4.068 acres as shown on a survey for Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic dated December 27, 1993 and made by Balzer & Associates, Engineers and Surveyors. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.maronic 3 '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE 32895-9 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES", SECTION 22-83, "INSPECTION AND READING OF METERS; BILLS; REFUNDS", SECTION 22-86.1, "UNPAID BILLS", AND SECTION 22-86.2, "LIEN FOR WATER AND SEWER CHARGES", OF CHAPTER 22 "WATER", ARTICLE II. "WATER SYSTEMS", DIVISION 2. "COUNTY WATER SYSTEM", OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR MONTHLY BILLING OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IN THE COUNTY OF ROANORE AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONS IIPON THE PLACEMENT OF LIENS ON RESIDENTIAL RENTAL REAL ESTATE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that, in order to better serve utility customers in the County, it is in the best interests of the public to provide for monthly billing of water and sewer services; and, WHEREAS, the 1994 Session of the General Assembly has adopted an amendment to §15.1-295, providing for water and sewer liens on real estate, which necessitates a corresponding amendment to Roanoke County Code §22-86.2; and, WHEREAS, the provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to the authority found in §§ 32.1-167, et sea•, and Chapter 9, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). WHEREAS, legal notice of these amendments has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on March 14, 1995, and March 21, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Division 2. County Water System of Article II. Water Systems, Chapter 22 WATER, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 22-82. Rates and fees. * ~ (c) Security Deposits. (2) If any utility customer at any time fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in disconnection or discontinuance of service, that customer shall pay an additional deposit as security for future bill payments. This deposit shall be required in addition to full payment of the outstanding utility service bill, including late payment penalties and any applicable charges imposed pursuant to Section 22-82(7), and shall be paid prior to reconnection of service at the same location or initiation of service at any other location in the County of Roanoke. a. Residential. The security deposit for a residential customer of water, water and sewer, and sewer only services, shall be in an amount equa.l.to the customer's last 1~~_}^-_j' '3G`~`'~~~t: billings, rounded to the nearest'~~~~~~~~~Orie~~~~~~~~~bollar ($1.00) (3) If any utility customer fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in a subsequent disconnection or discontinuance of service at any time, that customer shall pay additional security deposits, as required in subsection (c)(2) above, as follows: a. Residential. In the event that non-payment results in a second disconnection or discontinuance of service, a residential utility customer shall pay an additional security deposit in an amount equal to the customer's last s-~-*~~r_j- )~e~~t~? billings, rounded to the nearest~~~~~~~~~~One ~~~~~~~~b~oYl~ar ($1.00)':' Thereafter, no further deposits shall be required, except to the extent necessary to maintain or restore the deposit balance as hereinafter provided in subsection (c)(4). 2 Sec. 22-83. Inspection and reading of meters; bills; refunds. ~~~ The director shall cause all utility service meters to be inspected and read at least once every three (3) months for residential customers and at least once every month for commercial customers. The director shall have the authority to estimate usage ................................ if he determines that a meter reading ~?~`>?~':~~' cannot be obtained. ~~~'~ Utility service bills shall be paid at the utility billirig~~office or at such other places designated by the director. All deposits or advance payments for water, refunds to depositors of advance payments, or other refunds on account of errors shall be made at the utility billing office. ~~s-~ i ..a ~~ (Code 1971, § 20.1-28) Sec. 22-86.1 Unpaid bills. ~~ Any utility services bill which has not been paid by the due cTat~e of the bill, resulting in a past due balance, shall be subject to a late payment penalty of ten percent (10~) of the amount o f the b i t l~~n--awe=amt-~e~l-es s t-~i~~-e-Bo~~a~s }-. The late payment penalty shall be added to the past due balance ne 1-~t~~t~~ ~rf the ~~r f~r~>>~~?><<J~~'~ da of the month following the date that said ~li~~ll °was ~~iae~". ii•v :ii•.•i: :::: ''+:i:::::ii::i:::::'::?':i:2:i•iii:y: r.:f:i'i::i::ii::i?:..ii:.%:::: •.:Y..:<:::i::i: ~::i::i':i::i::i::}jvv} i:; ~':; ~<.:j:ij:i::i::iY:i::i::i::i:i~~::i ~:::i'vi})}iiiiii:! "v'+:>:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii?:.i:v.::'??:Jii.iiii"4i ::.i~;: :; :: e~ ~Z;f tie utility customer fails to make ~ful~l~ paymerit~~~~o :: ..... ~e "p:a:st due balanced and the aforesaid penalt~~n ~~r fifteenl~~ ~ (15) days of the m^n-~n~.:,:s~~e ....................................., :::::::. --fie: ~#~i the late a"` "ent ~ enalt ~ the disconnection ~ ~~ee``~""the .:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:::.;;:;:.;:.;;;:.::::: : reconnection fee, the deposit (f~~~applicable), and any other charges or fees shall be made prior to service being restored to the premises or initiated at any other location in the County of Roanoke. 3 (Code 1971, § 20.1-31) Sec. 22-86.2 Lien for Water and Sewer Charges. Taxes or charges hereafter made, imposed or incurred for water or sewers or use thereof in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall be a lien on the real estate served by a such waterline or sewer~~>fl:'d~id~>~~:~t'~~~' 2. That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective on and from July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: ~ .~' Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4 cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~/ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: MARCH 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance Authorizing Monthly Billing of Utility Customers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On March 14, 1995, the Board of Supervisors approved the first reading of the ordinance to institute monthly billing of utility customers. This is the second reading of the ordinance to authorize staff to go forward with this process. If approved, the ordinance would be effective July 1, 1995. Ordinance Detail: Beginning July 1, 1995, Roanoke County Water and Sewer residential customers would receive monthly utility bills. (Commercial customers currently are billed on a monthly basis.) The meters would continue to be read on a quarterly basis. The first and second bills during the quarterly cycle would be based on the previous quarter's actual reading. The third bill in the cycle would be based on the actual water usage adjusted for payments received for months one and two. (See Exhibit A for an illustration.) The revised Ordinance authorizes penalties to be applied to the unpaid monthly amounts. Cutoffs would only be done on delinquent bills after an actual reading of a customer's meter. Implementation: The team recommends starting phase in of the system in July 1995. All customers would receive a bill the beginning of July. One third of the customers would receive an actual bill for meters read in June 1995 and two thirds of the customers would receive an estimate of one month's usage. In August 1995, one third of the customers would receive a bill based on the actual reading, adjusted for one month's estimate paid in July 1995. Two thirds of the customers will receive bills for one month's estimated usage. Finally in September, one third of the customers will receive bills for actual usage adjusted for two previous payments for estimated usage, and two thirds of the customers will receive bills for estimated usage. Beginning in October 1995, the new system will be fully phased in. Due Dates. Penalties and Cutoffs: The ordinance amends the due date for payment of outstanding bills. The due date will be the 20th of the month in which the bills are mailed. Currently bills are due at the end of the month. The 10 days will be used by County staff to process the bills thereby assuring that penalties are applied properly and expeditiously. The penalty will be applied at the end of each month following the 20th and will be reflected on the bills mailed the beginning of the m:\finance\common\board\03-28-95a.wpd March 23, 1995 v-s month following the 20th and will be reflected on the bills mailed the beginning of the following month. This will eliminate the need for a separate penalty notice and save forms and postage cost. Penalties will be applied to estimated bills and actual settle up amounts, but cutoffs will only be done after actual readings. The delinquent customer would be subject to cutoff within 15 days of the mailing of the bill that includes the penalty on the actual reading. This would further protect the County against bad debts by moving the cutoffs up approximately 30 days. Delinquent customers currently have approximately 75 days from the original bill date. The amended ordinance will cut the time to approximately 45 days from the bill date. Public Information: The staff will mail an informational fact sheet explaining the new policy to each utility customer beginning with the April 1995 cycle of bills. This will continue through June 1995, at which point each customer will have received a notice. In addition, the March edition of Roanoke County Today will feature utilities and include information on the billing change. FISCAL IMPACT: Phase I (Monthly Billing) Current Year Costs: Public Information Costs $ 5,000 FY 1995-96 Costs: Increased Postage $ 48,000 Increased Forms 9,000 Interest Income (30,000) $ 32,000 The $5,000 for public information should be appropriated from the FY 1994-95 Utility Funds Unappropriated Balance. The other costs will be included in the FY 1995-96 Utility Budget request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At the conclusion of the public hearing the staff recommends the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance, the implementation plan, and the $5,000 appropriation from the Utility Funds Unappropriated Balance. `Re~spectfullQy~ -submitted, 7Gw•0 /~''~ ~_ Paul Grice Assistant Director of Finance Appro ed by, r ~,~,~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator m:\finance\common\board\03-28-95a.wpd March 21, 1995 v-s ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Johnson Referred O Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens m:\finance\common\board\03-28-95a.wpd March 21, 1995 Exhibit A Illustration of Monthly Billing Assumptions: Customer Actual Usage Bill June 1995 $90 Actual Usage Quarterly Reading September 1995 $80 July 1995 Monthly Bill $30 (1/3 of $90) August 1995 Monthly Bill $30 (1/3 of $90) September Monthly Bill $20 ($80 - $30 - $30) The September bill is the settle up bill for the quarter. m:\finance\common\board\3-14-95.a March 20, 1995 V-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES", SECTION 22-83, "INSPECTION AND READING OF METERS; BILLS; REFUNDS", SECTION 22-86.1, "UNPAID BILLS", AND SECTION 22-86.2, "LIEN FOR WATER AND SEWER CHARGES", OF CHAPTER 22 "WATER", ARTICLE II. "WATER SYSTEMS", DIVISION 2. "COUNTY WATER SYSTEM", OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR MONTHLY BILLING OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONS UPON THE PLACEMENT OF LIENS ON RESIDENTIAL RENTAL REAL ESTATE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has determined that, in order to better serve utility customers in the County, it is in the best interests of the public to provide for monthly billing of water and sewer services; and, WHEREAS, the 1994 Session of the General Assembly has adopted an amendment to §15.1-295, providing for water and sewer liens on real estate, which necessitates a corresponding amendment to Roanoke County Code §22-86.2; and, WHEREAS, the provisions of this ordinance are adopted pursuant to the authority found in §§ 32.1-167, et seg•, and Chapter 9, Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). WHEREAS, legal notice of these amendments has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on March 14, 1995, and March 21, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: v5 1. That Division 2. County Water System of Article II. Water Systems, Chapter 22 WATER, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 22-82. Rates and fees. (c) Security Deposits. (2) If any utility customer at any time fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in disconnection or discontinuance of service, that customer shall pay an additional deposit as security for future bill payments. This deposit shall be required in addition to full payment of the outstanding utility service bill, including late payment penalties and any applicable charges imposed pursuant to Section 22-82(7), and shall be paid prior to reconnection of service at the same location or initiation of service at any other location in the County of Roanoke. a. Residential. The security deposit for a residential customer of water, water and sewer, and sewer only services, shall be in an amount equal to .............................. . the customer's last z-~-*'=Y'_l• ?'~~tzi billing;, rounded to the nearest ~~ Orie I~ol~lar ($1.00). (3) If any utility customer fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in a subsequent disconnection or discontinuance of service at any time, that customer shall pay additional security deposits, as required in subsection (c)(2) above, as follows: a. Residential. In the event that non-payment results in a second disconnection or discontinuance of service, a residential utility customer shall pay an additional security deposit in an amount equal ...................................... to the customer's last ~,~_}^'^_1 1'~~x?t billing;, rounded to the nearest One Dollar ($1.00)'. Thereafter, no further deposits shall be required, except to the extent necessary to maintain or restore the deposit balance as hereinafter provided in subsection (c)(4). 2 Sec. 22-83. Inspection and reading of meters; bills; refunds. ~/-5 '~`;~' The director shall cause all utility service meters to be inspected and read at least once every three (3) months for residential customers and at least once every month for commercial customers. The director shall have the authority to estimate usage if he determines that a meter reading '>~ cannot be obtained. '~~ Utility service bills shall be paid at the utility billing office or at such other places designated by the director. All deposits or advance payments for water, refunds to depositors of advance payments, or other refunds on account of errors shall be made at the utility billing office. ~'_'_~ ~'~~'_'_ '~~ a,,.. -a ,.. . ~~.' .. TTl?~~~~~l~ll~~~.l~ {~ ~a~'-e~SiG i[Ce1'i'c'IT~a`al S1[~~Trr~GTI-CII~l7 ~ '~S1Trr~ i .. a ~~uizc~ (Code 1971, § 20.1-28) Sec. 22-86.1 Unpaid bills. '~s~ Any utility services bill which has not been paid by the due date of the bill, resulting in a past due balance, shall be subject to a late payment penalty of ten percent (10~) of the amount of the bill, -~:-9-~}. The late payment penalty shall be added to the past due balance ~rc~~~~e_ } ~;; the 3~th ~'~'<i`€ ~`~~<u~~~ da of the :~:.;;;:.;:.;:.;:.;~:.:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;::.;:.:;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;;:. Y month following the date that said~~ b1~"was ~~€a~e~ ~~t~. the utility customer tails to maKe full payment o balancer and the aforesaid penalty; -w~~ fifteens (15~) days of the mw~-1-i-~e~ the--~~e k~~~<;~~~, the late payment penalt~ae;, the disconnection ee, t e reconnection fee, the deposit (if" applicable), and any other charges or fees shall be made prior to service being restored to the premises or initiated at any other location in the County of Roanoke. 3 v-~ (Code 1971, § 20.1-31) Sec. 22-86.2 Lien for Water and Sewer Charges. Taxes or charges hereafter made, imposed or incurred for water or sewers or use thereof in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall be a lien on the real estate served by a such waterline or sewer~'~'y~'~t' 2. That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective on and from July 1, 1995. 4 1Ulillllllllilllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l llllllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllj~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~`/ ~ "~ E CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARIN ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS r ~ , ~ it ._ L = SUBJECT: ~ !-~ U~ ~~/~~ I`~~ v~~ 2~ ~ ~ n ~~~°, ,~~~ L'~;_~~) ~ ,~~, _, -fir: i I would like the Chairman the Board of Supervisors o recognize me during the meeting on the above matte so that I may comme WHEN CALLED TO THE LE RN, I WILL G MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AG E TO ABIDE B THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be give between ree to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an indi iduai or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based o then ber of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unle ins cted by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a esentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be direct d to a Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience mem ers is of allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the a fence will xercise courtesy at all times. r c _ ^ Speakers are requested o leave any 'tten statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SP NG ON BE OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WIT THE CLERK AUT RIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE NDIVIDUAL TO REP SENT THEM. PLEASE PRI LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - -_ __ -S _ -_ _ V ~ C AD RESS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- J-~ < % ~ ~ ~= Y,l ._ ~. ._ PHONE ~~~ / ~ t~ ~ i ~_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillillillilllillillllllil 11 11 llllllllillllllllllllillllllllilllllllllililllillllllllllllllliillllllllllllllllll~ 1~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111111 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ .~ ~7~ - - - - - - - - - -_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ E CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS ONiMENTS - - - -_ SUBJECT: ~ ~~- ~ 2~ 6 ~ Y ~ ~u U ~~ 6 i "j ~--~^ _ _ _ _ ~o ~- ~ - I would like the Chairman of a Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matters that I may comment. _ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LE RN, I WILL G MY NAME AND ADDRESS = - FOR THE RECORD. I AGRE TO ABIDE B THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given tween hree to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an indivi al o representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on t n tuber of citizens speakin on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless i ructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a re entation of their point of view oniv. Questions of clarification may e e tertained by the Chairman. _ - - - ^ All comments must be direct d to th Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience mem ers is no allowed. __ ^ p - Both s Bakers and the a fence will a rcise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any tten statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SP NG ON BEHAL OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = c SHALL FILE WIT THE CLERK AUTH ZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING TH INDIVIDUAL TO REP ENT THEM. - __ __ _ _ PLEASE P NT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO CLERK - - _ _ _ _ _ _ c c - c = NAME ~ L~ ~ S~, ~ s -- - _ - - - _ ADDRESS ~~1 tiu C ~ ~G S~ 2, ~~ Cc ~ __ _ PHONE Q ~ ~ - ~-E ~ Z9 mlllillilllllllllllillllillllllilllllllillllillillilllllllllllllllllliililllllllilll . 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~11 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitit~ _ _ -• - _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ _ _ sUBJECT: ~x n ~ ~ p- ~ 6'~ r I~ r p ~+ _ _ _ -. = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = Wf~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time Iimit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. ,_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ - _ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. =_ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _ AME Gf ~ M,P ~ (~ (f ~ h ADDRESS __ __ PHONE 7 7 ~1 - 7 7~ J' mlllllllllllliiillllllllllliilllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllll . IIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllillilillilllillll~ i~ll~~li~llllllllill~llll~ll~l~~~lllllllllllllllll~~lllllllilllllilllllllllilll~ll~~lllliilillllllllilillllllllll~il~l~~llli~l~lllllJ - _ - ~ - - ~ - - - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ __ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - SUBJECT: ~-c~i~~° - - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ _ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - - = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view oni~. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = = c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _ _ = _ - NAME - _ - _ _ - - ADDRESS - - - PHONE ~ ~ `"~~ ~ ~ - _ _ mllilllllilllllllliilllilllilllllllll11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 lU~~~~~~~~~~ill~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~11~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~lll!!J - - J ~ - - - ~ - - - ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. !~=~' - - =_ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE :--CITIZENS COMMENTS - _ - ,--- - - - - - SUBJECT: ~~ ,~: - - _ - __. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the = - P g g - meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - - BELOW: - -_ - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. . _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - _ - _ _ _ - - fillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllllil 111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 1UIIIIIIillllllillllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllilllllllllllllllllillll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilililllllllilllllllllillllljj~ s _- ~_~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~'~-~' _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c - SUBJECT: L ~C l~~ y~Z-~ !~ ~ /~. ~'~ -7~ i~ ~ _ _ _. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _= do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK '_ .. _ - - a - NAME ~2 ~' ~ V~rL~ n/ ~ ~~~ ° v~-YZ~ n`(~~TD•~~ ~~'~- ti rcS ADDRESS 3 y ~, ~ ; S ~ /~v~4-~- v ~,-G -_ PHONE 3~1s- ~~2 ~~ miiilll~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiii . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~ llllltillllillllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllll I II IIIIIIIilllllllllillllillllllllllillllliiilillllllllllll11 _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. i'.= APPE CE REQU T PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - SUBJECT: I~/~} r~c~°- - =. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. Wf~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty of~the Board to __ do otherwise. "' ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. _, .. '" NAME ~2 '- _ _ ~. __ ADDRESS, ~ a R ., c.~~ ~ f z J_,~ _ PHONE -7 ~~ - 7~~ _ _ _ - - _ ~. mlillllllllllillllliiilllllllllilllllllllllllillllllllllllllillilllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllillll 11111111111111111111111111111 ~-'~' r Bruce G. and Kathleen A. Frykman 2629 Bobwhite Drive Roanoke VA 24018 Home Tel. 772-7129 Work Tel. 342-6700 To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: We have lived in peace in our Penn Forest neighborhood for the last six years. Last Fall the situation changed dramatically. The recent installation of powerful suction pumps and blower motors on top of the Corrugated Container Corporation's roof has shattered the quiet and peaceful character of our home and neighborhood. These motors along with their plenums and cyclones generate a cacophony of intrusive and irritating noises at all hours of the day and night. How bad is the situation? I have obtained a National Bureau of Standards traceable audio spectrum analyzer in an effort to quantify the problem. The instrument measures sound pressure levels at 58 decibels in our bedroom at night with storm and main windows shut. The noise has a low frequency component around 100 cycles per second which peaks up to 60 decibels. On Friday and Saturday nights, we have so far been spared this torment. On these nights the noise levels are below detection by the instrument. It is virtually impossible to escape this low frequency hum. It penetrates our entire house as well as the cotton stuffed in our ears. Most annoying is the throbbing and wowing of multiple blowers and suction pumps resonating against each other in an an odious fugue. The first floor of our house offers some level of protection against this intrusion since it is below the line of sight of this rooftop equipment. My wife and I are required to attempt sleep on a reclining chair and couch in the first floor family room on many weekday nights. Repeated calls and complaints have received a sympathetic ear by Corrugated Equipment's plant manager. Yet, promises to correct the problem have remained unfulfilled for the last six months. Meanwhile, my wife and I approach each weekday evening with dread wondering which of the many tunes the plant will play for us all night long. March 28, 1995 This problem is correctable! What seems to be lacking is the a commitment to an urgent and comprehensive correction plan. For instance, Mechanical isolation of the large exterior plenums from the vibrations of motors and equipment is one step that can be taken easily. Additionally, protective sound barriers and mufflers can be installed. Equipment can be relocated to a less prominent position than it is today where it literally ~ , sings at us from the rooftop. My wife and 1 have been extremely patient waiting for corrective action, but now our patience has worn thin. We have been deprived of the rightful use of our property by the Corrugated Container Corporation. Our home, which represents a major investment for us, has been jeopardized by the actions of the Corrugated Container Corporation. I currently pay the county over $1500.00 per annum in property taxes for my home which has now been rendered unsuitable for its intended use. I urge the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to enforce its existing noise ordinance to the fullest extent possible and to urge the Corrugated Container Corporation to take URGENT action to correct the problem they have created for their neighbors. Sincer , ruc an ~ 9 NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. ~ ~~ ~ C ~ I A--~ ~- Na e G~~~ Signa ure 2 ~ ~ ~,~ Na e _ n,,...- ~ '~ Signat re 3 ~,G { d tea. '~ ~ uJh,~~. Na e Signature 4 ~-ld D ~v DS ~ Name Signat e 5 G~..r.-~~. ~rywht Name l'a~~-~-- ~~ r--~- Signature 6 ~D ~~ Na Sig a u e 3$.31 (Y~.e,r,~.r.Q,o~J I A-,P~~'k-.-~ Add e s 3 ~ q~ Date Addres S _ Da e 3 gs3 ~.~~1~.~- Address a~y-qs Date Addr,~ s Da e Address 3~ 9s" Date ~~ll ML""~~Do~~-~~k ~. Addres ~ ~ Date NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed. the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. i i ,2 ~ -R a ignature Address ~~~~ 3.. /~S- Date Na Signature 3 ~ r~ shh ~ .~ r~ n ~ ~~u e~~~r Signature 4 C ~l~a~ (eS l- I-~ ev~er~1 er Na~~f~-Gt~c,~+v ~. ~~~ ~ Signature 5 ~ ~ e r Pir' e ~' Name Signature of 6 a ~( ~db ~l h ,~ e. 'p r Address 3-y-~lS Date Addr s i ~-~~~ Date Z ro / S ~ /,ja ~Ur~l. ~c ~v.'~ Address ~ /595' Date ~~/S ,C~ a ~ l~i~i/ ~ sp r Ad~ ss 9~ Date ~~o~,~b~~~ ~ • Add a s,, Da e NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. Na uJ~ / Signature ~~~3 !~l~ ~ /-~~-oh COY s~ Add es D t 2 ~ ~o~.s. L . ~~iC.SO~II Name S nature 3 Nam t ~ lly I N i ~ (r.~ /Q- Signature 4 ~. V i ~ l /lf ! ll/ l CIZ- Nam s.-• Signature 5 C, UV~ 1 ~ T~ e Si a ure 6 Y n N e ~'" G•~ i n ture 3834- M~Doc..~c.~,2K. ~~ Address a.~4 ~~S Date 3 ~ ~-6 ~ e a ~ ~ ~ ~c-~Gc 12c~ Address Date 38~EA/~o w~.~-,~~ ,.5~.1•L- Address 3- ~ - ySf Date ~~ ~ i'}'1 c~ow~ e~C.. .n Address 3 -~-- ~_S Date 38 ~~ /~~a~a~ ~u~~ ~c~ Add es 9.S Da e NOIBE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. N e ~~1~~~ ~~~.- Signature Address Date 2 ~ G%~.E1~2 N °~Z ~~~~~ Name/~~ ~wG Signature 3 Name ~~SG- ~c~l~z,~ Signature NL~~~~ ~4r_ Signature Name ~ ~ ~ ~ r, Signature .~'c" Na Si nature Addr ss >r'~s~' D e ~~~ ~o~~~~~ ~~ Address -9S Date A31~/9~ .,~_ Date ~(~32 ~~ ~ ,~~ ~- Address 3 / ~-1 / Q~ Date ~n A~~~S~9S Date NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. 1 2 Name~Q r~~ ~. ~ ~d Signature Na e ~o/3iN ?',0/~/i1/fS Signature Address Date ~~. (~ Add`r3es~ ~ _._~- Date 3 ~~~ > YJ/I Name o ~ ,, Signature 4 N me Signature 5 6 ). ~5 o Wc, Na e Si nature ,~~ Nam ~ `~ Sigrfatu .S`~3,~ Liu~c.~~ ~Lv~ s ~' Address Date Address 3 - 4 - 9.5~ Date ~i J ( 1, ~G 5 ~ r vJ A dr ss Date //~~\~jy~ / J[/~/~~ ~~ ./ l/~ G'~Ly r` l ~~~3 Address / ~3-~f-~' Date NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. N"~m~~CQ ~ . e Signature 2 61~ ~~s~ Name . L. Sig atur s~~~ C~~-e~.~ ~~.~~. Address 3 - ~-(- 5'S Date s~ ~/ ~~s~~ ~~/~~0~:~ d r s S~ _ ate. 3 ame Signature 4 ~,` P.beCC-~ /-T y~ole~C o/` Signature 5 6 Address ~~ y ,~,~~ Date _~O .~ C~~-S C e, r1,~ I ~ dl . Address .~ y-~~ Date S7//~,eisGEA/T Address ~-~~~s Date az~vs ~~~ l G~~~ Address 3 1 !- 9'S Date Name ~~ rUit/n.CD.S Signature NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. 1 ~.1~ ~ ~~ki N s ~ Name ~ _ Si ature a-G o s ~~ ~ ~- ~'~.oN ~ 1 rq- Addre s 3 /l ~ Date r Name Addre ~~ _ Signature Date 3 Jctc,Kl ti n ~ Q ~ r~e-*1 N me S gnat re Address 3-~I~95 Date 4 .~ ~~l S 1-~-~1'~ S a e i nature 5 6 Na e Signatur Addr ss _ S 9 Date Ad re i ~~~ ~~ Date Address Date NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. ~ /V c ~~P~`~ ~ ~7a~, i~,~G~~h/~a,~ ..fie s~ e Address ~ -ice 9~'_ S gnat a Date a ~m ~ ~ C. 5 . ~ ~ nl~ S 2.7 2 ~ "T~~ 9 L~ ~a o.o b ~ Nam Ad ess ~. ~ ~ ~s Signature Date Na - - Add ess ~. ~~.~~r~~~iJ Signature D t 4 Name Signature 5 Name Signature 6 Name Signature Address Date Address Date Address Date ~~ NOISE PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Penn Forest and neighbors of the Corrugated Container Corporation, object to the noise emissions from the pneumatic systems located on top of it's manufacturing plant. Recently, these emissions have disturbed the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood, particularly during the quiet hours of the night when most residents are attempting to sleep. We insist that corrective action be taken immediately to abate these emissions and restore the tranquility of our neighborhood. i S Si, ~rZ~~.~ Nam Signature Add e s /G Date 2 3 4 5 6 ~~ Sig ature Name S~.gnature Name Signature Name Signature Name Signature ~ fir /~3/u ~ ~ `-~ ~ ~~ Address Date Address Date Address Date Address Date Address Date 0~ AOANp,~~ a ti p z c~ ' Y y~ y~ 1 38 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE FAX (703) 772-2193 H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINN(X, CHAIRMAN (703) 772-2004 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY County Primary and Secondary Road Fund WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (Revenue Sharing Program) BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Code of Virginia, Section 633.1-75.1 HARRY C. NICKENS Fiscal Year 1995-96 VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT County of Roanoke (703) 772-loos March 29, 1995 Mr. James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Givens: The County of Roanoke, Virginia, indicates by this letter its official intent to participate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The County will provide $500,000 for this program, to be matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia. The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible item(s) of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program may be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. Having requested the maximum amount of State funds, the County further requests the opportunity to match additional funds if they are made available. Since>~ely, ' ~r~ ~ n ~ n H.` ~D'dhll Fuzzy Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer Attachments: Priority Listing of Projects ®R~ Pte, o~ ROAN '~F ti • 's: ~ O o ~? 838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 31, 1995 Mr. G. William Stacey, IV 430 Willow Oak Drive Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Mr. Stacey: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRIGT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the North Cross School for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 13, 1995. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1995. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BYDECEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ~d • Q.C.!-c~.- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer C~.~ixxt#~ ~f ~Zn~t~nr~te ® R Paper foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to maintain funding for a $46.5 million statewide technology grant that would bring $667,025 to Roanoke County Schools. D. SB641 - Mobile homes in agricultural districts. - The Board expresses its opposition to this legislation and urges the Governor to veto this legislation and the General Assembly to allow local governments to regulate the placement of mobile homes within their jurisdiction. E. Oppose reallocation of lottery funds. - The Board expresses its opposition to the Governor's proposal to amend HB2542 and SB859 to return lottery profits to localities in exchange for reductions in other local aid programs. Although Roanoke County supports returning lottery proceeds to local governments, this should not be at the expense of other funds currently provided to local governments by the Commonwealth. F. SB1020 Charitable Gaming Commission. - The Board expresses its opposition to this legislation and urges the Governor to veto this legislation. II That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Governor and members of the General Assembly representing the Roanoke Valley, to the Clerk's of the House of Delegates and the Senate of the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia. agenda.genera1.95vMO.ses 4 ~ ~~ ~' ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 772-2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors ,,nn FROM: Paul M. Mahoney ~ ' ( ~' SUBJECT: Agenda -March 28, 1995 DATE: 22 March 1995 Item TT=2 -The Board will hold a public hearing on setting a real estate tax rate, the personal property tax rate, and the machinery and tools tax rate at 7:00 p.m. on March 28, 1995. It is recommended that the Board hold this public hearing to elicit citizen comments on these issues. It is further recommended that the Board actually set these tax rates at its next meeting which is scheduled for April 4, 1995. Staff will prepare the appropriate resolutions for Board action at that time. Item VV=4 -Rezoning of 4.068 acres of real estate located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane with conditions upon the application of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. The owner/applicant has proffered in writing certain conditions with respect to this proposed rezoning. Condition no. 1 provides as follows: The rezoned parcel will be used for the development of a residential subdivision containing five single family detached lots and four single family attached lots and petitioners will not petition this board to amend the rezoning to allow for multifamily use. The underlined portion of Condition no. 1 is unenforceable. No proffered condition can validly or legally prevent a property owner from petitioning a local governing body to change the zoning classification of that property. Further this condition is not consistent with the provisions of the zoning enabling legislation in the Code of Virginia, namely Section 15.1-491.2. Therefore, I would recommend that the Board not accept this portion of Proffer No. 1. PMM/spb 0~ ROANp~.~ ~ ~ A z c> v a, 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD ~~~~~ ~~ ~~xxY~r.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 24, 1995 Rev. John Hartwig Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 1887 Electric Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Hartwig: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of today. Thank you for agreeing to present the invocation at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Board Meeting on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, at 3 p.m. You have been very gracious to do the invocation for us in the past, and I appreciate youY doing it this time on such short notice. As we discussed, the Roanoke County Administration Center has moved from Brambleton Avenue to 5204 Bernard Drive, which was the old "Travelers Building", located directly behind Shoney's off Rt. 419. The Board Meeting room is on the first floor, opposite the elevators, and visitors' parking is in front of the building. Thanks again! Sincerely, ~~iY~~ Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® P~ 0~ ROANp,I.~ ~.. p 2 ~ o ai 7 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~~xrtt~ o~# ~o~~xr~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 199 5 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRIGT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR fiILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NiCKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell Virginia~House of Delegates P. O. Box 459 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Delegate Cranwell: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~lYt~+-~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate ® R Pam O~ ROANp,Y~ ti z c~ z o~ a~ 183 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (7031 772-2004 C~~~trtt~ a# ~v~t~a~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINN(X, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRIGT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTOM MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable H. Morgan Griffith Virginia House of Delegates P. O. Box 1250 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Delegate Griffith: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bj h Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate ®P~, O~ ROANp,1.~ L ti. p z ~ 2 °,~ , a, 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~~t~t~ o~f ~~~xxr~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum Virginia House of Delegates P. O. Box 1371 Roanoke, VA 24007 Dear Delegate Woodrum: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~_ / Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate ® Relycled Pier ' O~ pOANp~,~ ~ ~ ~ p z G~ ~ a~ 13 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRIGT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Virginia House of Delegates 1301 Orange Avenue, N.E. Roanoke, VA 24012 Dear Delegate Thomas: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Alen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate (~oixx~#g ~f ~a~t~o~~e ® Recycled paper OF ~ ANO~~ ~. i ti A 2 L7 z ~ a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ii. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR IiILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTO~I MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable J. Brandon Bell Virginia Senate 3721 Franklin Road, Suite 1 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Senator Bell: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate (~~~xxt#~ ~# ~.~~xr.a~e ® Recycled Paper 0~ aOANp,~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z J a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTO~t MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo Virginia Senate P. O. Box 448 Fincastle, VA 24090 Dear Senator Trumbo: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate C~aixx~#~ of ~.o~ttx~.o~~e ® Ae~yded Paper O~ ROANp~.~ L ~ ~ z c>, ~ a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~nrixx~#g of ~nr~txto~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 30, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS li. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNfX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN GATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY ',VINDSOR FiILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTOC`l MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable George F. Allen Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia 3rd Floor, State Capitol Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Allen: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 32895-2 of support and opposition to legislative items to be considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the Virginia General Assembly. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ • Q.~.-e-~-~- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates Susan Clark, Clerk, Virginia Senate ® R Paper MEMO - 3/15/95 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly Our agenda package for the 3/14/95 meeting included a report from Paul Mahoney on the actions of the 1995 General Assembly that would especially impact Roanoke County. I had planned to discuss this during the Board meeting, but elected not to because we were running late for our joint meeting with the School Board. I think it is important to let the Governor and our area legislators know our position on some of the key issues that may be considered by them at the veto session scheduled for April 5. My personal preferences are as follows: 1. Support HB599 providing the same funding for police departments next year as in the current year. 2. Support SB560 increasing sheriff's service fees to provide local funds to pay fringe benefits of the employees of constitutional officers. 3. Support full funding for the offices of the Commissioner of Revenue and Treasurer. 4. Support. the $46.5 million statewide technology grant that would bring $667,025 to Roanoke County schools. 5. Oppose the law requiring localities to allow single-wide mobile homes in agricultural areas. This should be a local decision. I would like to see an agenda item for our 3/28/95 meeting to include a resolution expressing our preferences on these issues, plus any others that a majority of the board members support. That resolution, if approved, should then be faxed to the Governor and our legislators because of the short time period between our meeting and the veto session. 1'' ./' copy: Elmer Hodge Paul Mahoney MEMO - 3/15/95 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly Our agenda package for the 3/14/95 meeting included a report from Paul Mahoney on the actions of the 1995 General Assembly that would especially impact Roanoke County. I had planned to discuss this during the Board meeting, but elected not to because we were running late for our joint meeting with the School Board. I think it is important to let the Governor and our area legislators know our position on some of the key issues that may be considered by them at the veto session scheduled for April 5. My personal preferences are as follows: 1. Support HB599 providing the same funding for police departments next year as in the current year. 2. Support SB560 increasing sheriff's service fees to provide local funds to pay fringe benefits of the employees of constitutional officers. 3. Support full funding for the offices of the Commissioner of Revenue and Treasurer. 4. Support the $46.5 million statewide technology grant that would bring $667,025 to Roanoke County schools. 5. Oppose the law requiring localities to allow single-wide mobile homes in agricultural areas. This should be a local decision. I would like to see an agenda item for our 3/28/95 meeting to include a resolution expressing our preferences on these issues, plus any others that a majority of the board members support. That resolution, if approved, should then be faxed to the Governor and our legislators because of the short time period between our meeting and the veto session. copy: Elmer Hodge Paul Mahoney County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP DATE: March 9 , 1995 RE: City of Roanoke Special Use Permit Request and "456" Compliance Determinations; Regional Stormwater Detention Facilities; North Lakes and Montclair Estates Areas of Roanoke County. On your February 28, 1995 the Board held first reading on two Special Use Permit requests submitted by the City of Roanoke. These permits were for the construction of two regional stormwater detention basins in the North Lakes and Montclair Estates area of Roanoke County. Second readings and public hearings on these requests were scheduled for March 28, 1995. The Planning Commission scheduled public hearings on these two requests, (and a related "456" compliance determination) for March 7th. During the first hearing for the Montclair Estates basin, it became evident that the City's applications for the requested SUP's were not valid, because the city is not currently the owner nor contract purchaser of the properties needed for either detention facility. Further, the city was not acting as an official agent for the owner (with owner's consent). This became known to the staff and Commission during the hearing when a representative of the owner of the land affected by the Montclair Estates basin appeared at the hearing and testified that the owner had not agreed to sell the land to the city, and had further not agreed to the SUP application. As zoning administrator, I asked the Commission to abandon the hearings, and defer all further action until such time as the City has standing as a valid applicant. Staff will be meeting with our city counterparts over the next 30 days to attempt to resolve this issue. Until such time that the Commission receives valid applications, and holds valid hearings, the Boards action on these requests will not be necessary. I will keep you advised. Please let me know if you have any questions. c: Elmer Hodge Paul Mahoney Geor a 'm son Mary Allen PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 22-82, "RATES AND FEES", SECTION 22-83, "INSPECTION AND READING OF METERS; BILLS; REFUNDS", SECTION 22-86.1, "UNPAID BILLS", AND SECTION 22-86.2, "LIEN FOR WATER AND SEWER CHARGES", OF CHAPTER 22 "WATER", ARTICLE II. "WATER SYSTEMS", DIVISION 2. "COUNTY WATER SYSTEM", OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR MONTHLY BILLING OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONS UPON THE PLACEMENT OF LIENS ON RESIDENTIAL RENTAL REAL ESTATE. All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Please publish on the following dates: Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 Please send the invoice to: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RIK.E E~ARD '>UPER'JISQRS TEL?03-7~~:-2193 Transmit Confirmation Report No . Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result 003 9-/981-.f 3415 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS ~~yy M))ar 10'95 1145 l~1'LL Norm 02 OK Ma.r 1.0'95 1145 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC to rezone 22.21 acres from I-2 to AR to allow single family dwellings, located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated : March 9 , 19 9 5 ~' ~~''~'c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Buck Mountain Land, LLC c/o Jolly, Place, Fralin & Prillaman, PC 3912 Electric Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 989-0000 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVIBORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey & Laura Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow single family attached and detached dwellings, located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 1995 ~ ~~~c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Jeffrey & Laura Maronic c/o Bird, Kinder & Huffman, PC PO Box 2795 Roanoke, VA 24001 (703) 982-1755 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Everett J. Miles Sr. to rezone 1.864 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to allow general retail sales, located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated : March 9 , 199 5 ~ ~~:~~c., Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 To be paid on delivery by: Everett J. Miles Sr. 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 387-0886 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of VA Recreational Facilities Authority to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres from EP to AG-3, located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated : March 9 , 19 9 5 ~. ~Q~1 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2005 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 '" '• ~- FP AN~.F C~~a~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ a ,~ 1 8 DEPARTMENT OF FlNANCE L~C~~ M~ March 8, 1995 D 9~ I Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha, 'DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on March 14, 1995 and March 21, 1995 . Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2186. Sincerely, ~~~ W . Brent Robertson Budget Manager c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® Recya•a P~ PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: March 14. 1995 March 21, 1995 t LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.1- 227.8 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as amended on the issuance of general obligation school bonds of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $10,100,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 28, 1995. The public hearing which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:00 p.m. on March 28, 1995 before the Board of Supervisors in the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive. S. W., Roanoke, Virginia. y 1rd . ~.t~.t-.v Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: Tuesday, March 14, 1995 Tuesday, March 21, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NUMBER: (703) 772-2193 DATE: March 6, 1995 TO: Martha Plank COMPANY: Roanoke Times & World News FAX NUMBER: 981-3365 NO. OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 1 FROM: MARY H. ALLEN, CLERK TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS # TO CALL IF TRANSMITTAL IS INCOMPLETE: 772-2003 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Please publish the attached legal notice on March 14 and March 21, 1995. RKE BORRD SUPERVISORS TEL:~03-772-219 Transmit Confirmation Report No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result 003 99813365 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Mar 06'95 14:24 00'56 Norm 02 OK Mar 06'95 14:24 ~~~ ~~~ .~P~ Q~ P a,,~' -~,- ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ P v P 1 ~ ~o~~~g~ P ,L'S O ,.~~ ~ ~~~ a v o ~ „ ~~ G ae°~~ e `ey`e taPO~ F~ a~ _~p_~~p~ j,Q~ ~~O Jae So ~`et~~ • II--OO'' / v ~~O t ~o ~ ~ ~ W" ,` o - V V,~\~~~ ~ ` ,~ P~ t,, ~ r.. a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ` A~ McGu~DWooDs B~ ~B~ LLP One James Center 901 East Cary Stree[ Richmond, Virginia 23218-4030 Telephone/TDD (804) 775-1000 Fax (804) 775-1061 Direct Dial: (804) 775-4395 February 10, 1995 Ms. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Roanoke County - VPSA Bond Public Hearing Dear Diane: Enclosed is the Notice of Public Hearing and resolution to be presented to the Board of Supervisors for a public hearing authorizing the VPSA bonds. I have assumed that the Board is meeting on March 28 and that the public hearing will be at 7:00 p.m. Please review the notice to make sure time, date and place are accurate. Please publish the enclosed Notice of Public Hearing once a week for two consecutive weeks not later than Tuesday, March 14 and Tuesday, March 21 for a March 28 public hearing. Let me know if you would like a copy of the resolution on diskette. In the copy of this letter to Mr. Mahoney, I have also enclosed an Order to be filed with the Circuit Court along with a certified copy of the resolution after it is adopted. In the resolution I have provided that Crestar Bank will be the paying agent for these bonds. Crestar Bank was paying agent on the last series of the County's bonds and I am assuming that it will be easiest for the Count}' to continue with the same paying agent. Very truly yours, n Bonnie M. France /srp Enclosures cc: Dr. Deanna Gordon, Superintendent of Schools Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire ALEKANDRIA BALTIMORE BRUSSELS CHARLOTTESVILLE JACKSONVILLE NORFOLK RICHMOND TYSONS CORNER WASHINGTON, DC ZURICH _..~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED BOND FINANCING BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.1-227.8 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds (the "Bonds") of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $10,100,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 28, 1995. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on March 28, 1995, before the Board of Supervisors in the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. W:\VSA\ROANK\ROANK25.NPFi Budget Calendar FY 1995-96 2/14/95 Finalize vehicle inventory, mid-year budget report -projections. Finalize revenue projections. 2/17/95 Departmental budgets due to Budget Department. 2/17 to 3/3/95 Budget Department review of budgets. 2/28/95 Budget work session-revenues, mid-year expend., vehicle inventory. Public Hearing: General comment on FY1995-96 budget. 3/8 to 3/31/95 Budget Team Meetings/Citizen's Budget Review Committee: Prioritized Addbacks, Capital Improvements, Presentation of Departmental budgets, Discussion of Funding Issues 3/8 Citizen's Committee 3/13 Internal Support and Operations Budget Team (ISOP) 3/15 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services Budget Team 3/17 Public Safety Budget Team 3/20 Internal Support and Operations 3/22 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services ~ ~ LL~ 3/24 Public Safety ~1 V 3/29 Citizen's Committee-Isop, Community Services 4/5 Citizen's Committee-Public Safety, Courts/State Agencies ~ 4/19 Citizen's Committee-CIP, Final proposal 3/27-3/31/95 Team budget presentations to County Administrator. 3/28/95 Public Hearing: Tax Rates and Tax Assessment Increase(101 %). Joint budget work session with School Board. 4/1/95 School Board presents budget to Board of Supervisors 4/4/95 Special Meeting -Budget worksession. Adopt Tax Rates. 4/11/95 Volunteer Rescue and Fire Chiefs budget worksession. 4/25/95 Budget worksession, Public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget and CIP. 5/9/95 Adoption of Budget and CIP. 5/23/95 First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. 6/13/95 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. a:vnr,-xc~uncrnw..r.~..~c,-ii.oHC.wr 1-1 • ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 28, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Cycle Roanoke Valley, Inc. for Sponsorship of the 1995 Tour DuPont COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Tour DuPont is entering its seventh year in 1995. It began in 1988 as Tour De Trump and became Tour DuPont in 1990. It is the premier cycling event in North America. The event is patterned after the Tour de France and includes daily races called stages. On May 9. 1994, Tour DuPont appeared in the Roanoke Valley for its first mountain time trial and drew 88,000 spectators along the route. The entire race was witnessed by more than two million spectators and more than 200 million watched portions of the event on regional, national and international television. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Tour DuPont returns to the Roanoke Valley on Monday May 1 for the second year. The local event is organized by Cycle Roanoke valley Incorporated and local jurisdictions assist in sponsoring the event. Assistant Director of Economic Development Brian Duncan is a member of the Board of Directors of Cycle Roanoke Valley, Inc. The 1994 event in the Roanoke Valley generated $900,000 in media exposure and filled every motel room. There are several levels of financial sponsorship available for the 1995 Tour DuPont. They are as follows: Diamond Level - $2,500 Bronze Level - $5,000 Silver Level - $7,500 Gold Level - $10,000 Each level provides various benefits including advertisements in the Roanoke Times & world News, mention on various race publicity ,~ posters radio announcments maps, etc., VIP passes at the start or finish hospitality areas, and benefits. More detailed information on the levels and benefits is attached. Staff recommends that Roanoke County sponsor Tour DuPont as well as offer in kind contributions. The County is also participating in selling shirts and other souvenirs. ALTERNATIVES• There are four sponsorship levels: (1) Diamond Level - $2,500 (2) Bronze Level - $5,000 (3) Silver Level - $7,500 (4) Gold Level - $10,000 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds could be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate $5,000 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance to become a Bronze Level Sponsor of the 1995 Tour DuPont. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens March 10, 1995 CYCLE ROANOKE Jir. Elmer Hodge ;ounty Administrator ;ounty of Roanoke X204 Bernard Drive, PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 INCORPORATED Dear Elmer: SW P. 0 . B 0 X 13 2 I am writing you on behalf of Cycle Roanoke Valley, Inc. the local organizing ROANOKE, VA committee of the Tour DuPont -America's Premier Cycling Event. As you know the Tour returns to the Roanoke Valley on Monday, May 1 for the 2 4 0 0 2 second year in a row. This year's event is sure to attract even more fans than the 88,000 that lined the route in 1994. I would like to thank each jurisdiction for their support last year and their continued support this year. We would like to offer each jurisdiction the opportunity to be a sponsor of the Tour this year and receive the full benefit of its sponsorship. Therefore, I have enclosed a sponsorship package for your review. I will contact you regarding this information in the very near future. If you have any immediate questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 985-4254 or Brian Duncan at 772-2095. Thank you for your time and support! Sincerely ~~~ Donnovan M. You Chair -Corporate Marketing Tour DuPont -Roanoke Valley Time Trial ~.~ • i ~ ° .~~ ~,~.~ a- ao-~s ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 28, 1995 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-200a We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND i AWARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring April, 1995, as Child Abuse Prevention Month. 1995 as D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of Claim by Joseph J. Steffen v. Roanoke County Department of Social Services. (Joseph Obensha' ssistant County Attorney) S r. 2. Request cle Roanoke Valley, Inc. for Sponsorship of the 1995 Tour DuPont (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 3. Resolution of Support of Items to be Considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) ~~~ F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to Rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to House Administrative Offices and Church Services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 2. Ordinance to Rezone 0.49 Acre from C-1 Conditional to C- 1 to Construct a Learning Center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. Ordinance to Rezone Approximately 1.95 Acres from C-1 and C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Construct a Supermarket and Drug Store, Located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES \~ Ordinance A e nalties for a Stre s and Enforc ent of Parking o Vehic Such Violate s. County Attorne 'ng and Reenacti Sections 12-51 .in Violat ns and 1 52, Parking on hways Gen rally to thorize the ning Vio do s Involving t e Unlawful by the Iss an a of Parking 'ckets for (Joseph Obe hain, Senior Assistant 3 K. APPOIlVTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. ~ ~'~,~ 1. Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds into the ~.-~ ~~~ Ie Medical Copayment Progra~ ~~ 2. Request for Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request for Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Donation of Waterline Easement and a 15-foot Sanitary Sewer Easement on a 1.927 Acre Parcel from Lewis-Gale Building Corporation to the Board of Supervisors. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 4 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 5. Bond Project Status Report ~ ,fie fo ~j ~ S ~e rze~`t o r~ Q. WORK SESSION ?? 1. Budget Work Session R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION ~ ~. a ~ Public Hearing to Elicit Comment on the Follawp ~ T. a. To set the real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assess~yaluation. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5 ~~ - ~~~-~-~-u-~~a~ ,ems b. To set the personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assess valuation. c. To set the machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. ' I C J Public Hearin and _Ado tion _ of ___.R_esolution on the g ___ _. _ ___ P _ _ _ _ __-- Issuance of eneral Obl~ ation School Bonds in the ~ ~ Estimated Amo~[f" of ~10,100,00~ ~Finance Certain ~ Capital Projects for School Purposes. u~, r' ~-1-~ ~ 7 ~ V, PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF mod' `S ORD CE ~y/ PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS °~-- /~~ DEFERRED: g~~ ~ tr G1,-•> r1 ~ 1rl C-a v~ ryl i s S i o ~ An Ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Major) 400 Feet Nor est of the Intersection of Ambassador Drive and Envoy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. An ordinance Authorizing a Special Use Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin (Utility Services, Major) 300 Feet Southeast of the Terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District. Unon the Petition of the City of Roanoke. 1. An Ordinance to Rezone ~vo Parcels of Land Totaling 7.93 Acres from EP to AG-3, Located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. An Ordinance to Rezone 22.21 Acres from I-2 to AR to Allow Single Family Dwellings, Located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Buck Mountain land, LLC. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.864 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Allow General Retail Sales, Located at 1806 and 6 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. An Ordinance to Rezone 4.068 Acres from R-1 to R-3 to Allow Single Family Attached and Detached Dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Water and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions Upon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) ~.,~ ~ CITIZEN CObIl1~ICNTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT TO MARCH 29, 1995 AT 12:00 NOON AT THE VINTON WAR MEMORIAL FORA TOINT MEETING WITH THE VINTON TOWN COUNCIL. Praclama~i~m WHEREAS, the incidence of child abuse and neglect has reached alarming proportions in the United States and whereas 14,101 cases of child abuse and neglect were substantiated in Vuginia during the fiscal year 1993-94; and ~ (P cases were substantiated in WHEREAS, Vuginia and ~ ~ are committed to supporting families through programs that will prevent child abuse and neglect; WHEREAS, there are numerous dedicated individuals and organizations in who work daily to break the cycle of child abuse and neglect and to find families the assistance that they need; WHEREAS, every child has a right to live rather that to exist, to be a person rather than a possession and to be equal with every other human being regardless of age. WHEREAS, all children deserve loving hugs, warm homes and tender care from parents and adults who make them feel safe and happy and loved THEREFORE, I, do hereby procla;~m th ~ nth of April 1995 as CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH in ~(~ and 1 call upon our citizens to observe the month with appropriate programs and activities and to wear a BL UE RIBBON to show that it shouldn't hurt to be a child '~~.uv~ - ~-r' r J ,. Y f ~ ~ 1.,~(.~~ `.j~ J i Virgi a Prevention Month ` j ~ ~ pOAN ,I-~ ~~ ~~ ~ 2 o a, 3 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE March 15, 1995 ~p1ilt~1, J Df ",~AFiI"Ii1~P Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha, ~~-''; ~ 2 I 1995 I I i i V DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on March 21, 1995. Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2186. Sincerely, ~~~ ~ W . Brent Robertson Budget Manager c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® R•~.yclea P~- PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 28th day of March, 1995 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: ~ - ~ µ AN ,~, F ~. . ~ c> ,2 a 38 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE March 15, 1995 ~~~n~ ~f ~~~nu~~ DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR Ms. Carol Hingular Roanoke Times and World News Retail Advertising Division 201 W. Campbell Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Carol, PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR D ~Q~--~° RZ~~D Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Proposed Tax Increase" advertisement for the County of Roanoke. Please publish this as a block ad on Tuesday, February 15, 1994. Bill the cost of publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Sincerely, ~~ ~~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager C: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Anne Marie Green, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2030 ® r~cyal.a P~ -. .J . 'r NOTICE OF PROPOSED TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. 1. Assessment Increase: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by 3.28 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.09 per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke proposes to adopt a tax rate of $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the proposed rate would be $0.04 per $100, or 3.67 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday, March 28, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Special Instructions This notice shall be at least the size ofone-eighth page of a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18-point. The notice shall not be placed in that portion, if any, of the newspaper reserved for legal notices and classified advertisements. This notice must be published on March 21, 1995, and billed to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. X03-23-1995 05~08AM FROM Ed Kohinke Catawba Spvsr TO Supervisors ~~ ~~~"~ G~ ~~~ /~ ~ ~ r ~i~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o~' Sys. ~ ~~G ~ ~ W ~ ~~ ~MORANOUnn ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ T0: Edword G. Kphinke FROM. Ebner C. Hodfl9 ~~"' D~ITE: March 23, 1995 ~: ~: ,~'''".~ .,tr~~G P.01i04 r~ paT' dv Tare/.6/ `~ SUBJECT: Appointment to the Industrial Development Aufihority Ai your request, t have asked for Suggestions from the staff for potential mernbefs of the Induarisl DQvelopment Authority from the Catawtaa JlAagisterial Di9~ict. Listed below ars rcaveral suggestions: ~ ~ Works with ITT 1362-7322(, travels a fair amount. the is on the Friends of the Ltttrsry Board, is active and very hgipfu~. She is also active in the Glenvar communtXy, helps with the newsletter. Don't know if she would by Intoroated in serving. Carole ~aekrrtsn~ Owner, Mutti-Media Creations, -iv@s in Cherokee Mike I6xQ3 CneroKee IiQ!>s Drive, 380.294 t) and hsa IiveC in the Gionvar eras for 17 yearx. Sho is irtvolvsd in both the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Salam/Roanoke County Chamber, Has a strong business background and is interQSte in serving. DAYId 8helor: President for Chairman Qf the 6oarQ) of Rpanpko Restaurant SarviCO 1387.1 ~ 11). Lived in Catawba MBgisteriel District for years. Don't know If he vvauid be interssted in serving. ~6n Hubbard: Executive Director of the Roanoke Vaiiay Resource Authority i867- 9060). ForrtHr Assistant County Administrator • very knowledgeable about the County. Don't know if he would be interested in serving. 1 hope this paws you :ovAral sltornetiv®s. ~rwG Ed Kohinke: RE: Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority Elmer called Carole Brackman this morning and she has agreed to serve on the Industrial Development Authority. He told her you would be nominating her at the March 28 meeting and she would be confirmed at the next meeting and we would be sending her a letter of appointment after that. Mary Allen 3/23/95 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: AMENDMENT TO THE 1994-95 BUDGET FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CLEAN-UP OF DIXIE CAVERNS All members of the public inter~ssted in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located at 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. _ ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates: March 21, 1995 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 e -~~ WSJ /D ' 3L yin, ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN