The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4/25/1995 - Regular~ ROAN ,`. z p 2 a~ 13 C~.~ixxt#~ ~r~ ~.~r~tx~.~~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA APRIL 25, 1995 ~~~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday' at 3:00 p:m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk fo the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. THERE WILL BE A WORK SESSION AT 2 P.M., PRIOR TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING A. WORK SESSION (2 P.M. -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session with Virginia Department of Transportation on Road Improvements to Route 221. WORK SESSION BEGAN AT 2:05 P.M. WITH EGK ABSENT. VDOT REPS PRESENT: TEFF ECHOES, RESIDENT ENG., PETE SENSABAUGH, DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION ENG,; SCOTT HODGE, ASSISTANT RESIDENT ENG.; AND BONNIE GRIFFIN, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER SENIOR i ® Recycled Paper B. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. HCN ARRIVED 3:07 P.M. 2. Invocation: Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PMM ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM 2.1-344 (A) (3) TO CONSIDER THE DISPOSITION OF PUBLICLY HELD REAL ESTATE. HCN ADVISED THAT PETITIONER HAS REQUESTED THAT ITEM V-4 BE CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE E. BRIEFINGS NONE F. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County employees. (Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance) a PRESENTED BY DDH AND TULIE WHITE, CONSULTANT, SLABAUGH, MORGAN & WHITE (1) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT (2) HCN AMENDED LBE MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL APPROPRIATE TIME IN EVENING AYES: BIT, HCN NAYS: EGK, LBE, FM ~3) LBE WITHDREW HIS MOTION TO APPROVE (4) FM MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL LATER IN THE EVENING - WITHDRAWN ~5) LBE MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL EVENING PORTION OF MEETING TO HOLD A WORK SESSION WITH ACTION TO FOLLOW AYES: BLJ, LBE, HCN, FM NAYS: EGK 2. Request for reimbursement to General Services budget for expenses incurred for the citizen bulk/brush self-haul program. (Bill Rand, Director, General Services) A-42595-1 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AND THAT PROGRAM BE CONTINUED INTO NEXT FISCAL YEAR AYES: BLJ, LBE, HCN, FM NAYS: EGK 3. Approval of donation of surplus personal computers and/or parts to Craig County Public Schools. (Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement) A-42595-2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Approval of sale of surplus 1973 Ford tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department. (Elaine Carver, 3 Director, Procurement) A-42595-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC E[EARINGS NONE I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIILST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 23, 1995 AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 4 AND 5 - URC 1. Ordinance to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 Conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kenneth McNeil. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of School Board of Roanoke County. 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Mullins. 4 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial district, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. BI{T QUESTIONED SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION YARD IN RURAL VILLAGE ZONING. LBE ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE SECOND READING. 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. HCN STATED THAT HE FEELS THIS REZONING HAS NO IMPACT ON THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY AND INVITED BOARD MEMBERS TO VIEW THE PROPERTY. 6. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located at 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing conveyance of easements to Appalachian Power company and Bell Atlantic extending along Benois Road and across a surplus well lot. (John Willey, Property Manager) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR MAY 9, 1995 URC 2. Ordinance declaring .06 acre of real estate (Public Service Center) identified as Tax Map No. 36.03-1-1, located off s Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81, to be surplus and accepting offer for sale. (John Willey, Property Manager) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR MAY 9, 1995 URC 3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr. (John Willey, Property Manager) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR MAY 9, 1995 URC K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE L. APPOINTMENTS NONE M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-42595-4 BI,~T MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 6 1. Approval of Minutes for March 14, 1995, March 28, 1995, March 29, 1995, and April 4, 1995. 2. Request for adoption of Resolution providing Notice of Intent to Abandon Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane). R-42595-4.a 3. Donation of a 20-foot water line easement from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford to serve Heather Park Subdivision. A-42595-4.b 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with the development of Country Kitchen on Plantation Road by Plantation Development, L.C. A-42595-4.c N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE P. REPORTS BLOT MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FOLLOWING REPORTS A~'rER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 6, 7, AND 8 - UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund Supervisor Eddp~ Attended dedication of Garet Mill Park plaveronnd Satnrday. 4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of March 31, 1995. 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability pet Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1995. 6. Status Report on Cleanup of Illegal Dumps. 7. Status Report on the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program. 8. Quarterly Report of Claims Activity for Self-Insurance Program. 9. Reports from the Virginia Department of Transportation Acknowledging Acceptance of Roads into the Secondary System: Acceptances Effective January through March, 1995, and 1994 Annual Report Cl: DECLARED FIVE MINUTE RECESS AT 4:35 P.M. Q. WORK SESSION (4:00 - 5:30 P.M. -BOARD MEETING ROOM) 1. Budget Work Session with Representatives from Human Service, Social Service, and Cultural Agencies. WORK SESSION BEGAN AT 4:45 P.M. 31 REPRESENTATIVES SPOKE R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to consider the disposition of publicly held property. LBE MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:05 P.M. - URC WITH B ~T ABSENT DUE TO POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST 8 S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-42595-5 LBE MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:05 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION - URC WITH BL.T ABSTAINING EVENING SESSION CHAIRMAN 1MIINNIX ANNOUNCED THAT ITEM V.4 HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995, AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER T. RECOGNITIONS 1. Presentation of Resolution of Congratulations to Margaret S. Moles upon being selected Virginia's National Distinguished Principal. FM PRESENTED RESOLUTION TO MRS. MOLES U. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE V. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 9 CONSENSUS OF BOARD TO CON'T'INUE UNTIL MAY 23, 1995. BI.~T TO GIVE WRITTEN CONCERNS TO STAFF. HCN QUESTIONED WHETHER BUILDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED PROPERLY. 2. Ordinance to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 Conditional to C- 1 Conditional to construct a learning center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-42595-6 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C-1 and C-2 Conditional to C-2 Conditional to construct a supermarket and drug store, Located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-42595-7 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH AMENDED PROFFERS URC 4. Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) ~CONTINUIED FROM MARCH 28, 1995) CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995 AT REOUEST OF PETITIONER PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995. 10 Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) (CONTINUED iJN1'IL MAY 23, 19951 PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONERS. Ordinance to rezone 4.068 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow single family attached and detached dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) W. CONTINUATION OF BUDGET WORK SESSION -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM (IF NEEDED -APPROXIMATELY 7:30 P. M.) 3 REPRESENTATIVES SPOKE X. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS 3 CITIZENS SPOKE IN FAVOR OF FULL FUNDING OF SCHOOL BUDGET Y. WORK SESSION ON HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT WORK SESSION BEGAN AT 7:50 P.M. DDH, JULIE WHITE, PRESENT 1. Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County employees. (Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance) ii A-42595-8 AT 8:30 P.M., FM MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND APPROVE A HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT FOR COUNTY AND SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WHICH INCLUDES TWO TIERS (THE BASIC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POINT OF SERVICE PLAN) URC Z. ADJOURNMENT BLJ MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 8:35 P.M. - UW 12 ~ QOAN ,~.~ ti. Z ~ 2 a~ 1 38 ,~ ff ~ o..,~,~ C~~ixx~t~ ~~ ~.~~xz~~~.e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA APRIL 25, 1995 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. /ndividua/s with disabi/ities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, p/ease contact the Clerk to the Board at (7031 772-2005. We request that you provide at /east 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. THERE W/LL BE A WORK SESS/ON AT 2 P.M_ PR/OR TO THE BOARD OF SUPERV/SORB MEET/NG A. WORK SESSION (2 P.M. -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session with Virginia Department of Transportation on Road Improvements to Route 221. B. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 1 ® Recycled Paper 2. Invocation: Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS E. BRIEFINGS F. NEW BUSIlVESS 1. Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County employees. (Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance) 2. Request for reimbursement to General Services budget for expenses incurred for the citizen bulk brush self-haul program. (Bill Rand, Director, General Services) 3. Approval of donation of surplus personal computers and/or parts to Craig County Public Schools. (Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement) 4. Approval of sale of surplus 1973 Ford tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department. (Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement) G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 2 H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 Conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kenneth McNeil. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of School Board of Roanoke County. 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Mullins. 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial district, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. 6. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located at 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3 J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing conveyance of easements to Appalachian Power company and Bell Atlantic extending along Benois Road and across a surplus well lot. (John Willey, Property Manager) 2. Ordinance declaring .06 acre of real estate (Public Service Center) identified as Tax Map No. 36.03-1-1, located off Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81, to be surplus and accepting offer for sale. (John Willey, Property Manager) 3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr. (John Willey, Property Manager) K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES L. APPOINTMENTS M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for March 14, 1995, March 28, 1995, March 29, 1995, and April 4, 1995. 2. Request for adoption of Resolution providing Notice of Intent to Abandon Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane). 4 3. Donation of a 20-foot water line easement from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford to serve Heather Park Subdivision. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with the development of Country Kitchen on Plantation Road by Plantation Development, L.C. N. REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of March 31, 1995. 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1995. 6. Status Report on Cleanup of Illegal Dumps. 7. Status Report on the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program. 8. Quarterly Report of Claims Activity for Self-Insurance Program. 9. Reports from the Virginia Department of Transportation Acknowledging Acceptance of Roads into the Secondary 5 System: Acceptances Effective January through March, 1995, and 1994 Annual Report Q- R. S. T. U. V. WORK SESSION (4:00 - 5:30 P. M. -BOARD MEET/NG ROOMJ 1. Budget Work Session with Representatives from Human Service, Social Service, and Cultural Agencies. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION RECOGNITIONS 1. Presentation of Resolution of Congratulations to Margaret S. Moles upon being selected Virginia's National Distinguished Principal. PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. (Terry Harrington, 6 Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. Ordinance to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 Conditional to C- 1 Conditional to construct a learning center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C-1 and C-2 Conditional to C-2 Conditional to construct a supermarket and drug store, Located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) CONTINUED FROM MARCH 28, 199 PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) (CONTINUED UNTII. MAY 23 199 PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONERS. Ordinance to rezone 4.068 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow single family attached and detached dwellings, Located at 4824 Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey and Laura Maronic. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) W. CONTINUATION OF BUDGET WORK SESSION -FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM (/F NEEDED - APPROX/MATEL Y 7:30 P.M.J X. Y. CITIZEN COMIVVII;NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT s ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE• AGENDA ITEM• April 25, 1995 Work Session with Virginia Department of Transportation on Road Improvements to Route 221 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for the Board members to discuss with representatives from the Virginia Department of Transportation the progress and plans for improvements to Route 221. Since this is a work session, there will be no citizen input. However, citizens will have opportunities for input at the following meetings that VDOT has scheduled: 1. Information meeting - April 27 , 1995 - Meeting will begin at 5 p.m., with comments and program at 7 p.m. at Cave Spring Junior High School 2. Public Hearing - May 24, 1995, from 4 p.m. until 8 p.m., at Cave Spring Junior High School 3. Public Hearing - May 25, 1995, from 4 p.m. until 8 p.m., at Back Creek Elementary School ~~ E fitter C . Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( 1 Minnix Nickens A-42595-8 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER r -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County Employees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is very good news for School and County staff and we are pleased to offer our employees a health care alternative that improves coverage and reduces their cost. We will continue to offer the basic Trigon plan that has been in place for years. At the employee's option, we would like to offer a Trigon, Point of Service plan. The POS plan has a large number of participating physicians and utilizes both Roanoke Memorial and Lewis Gale hospitals and physicians. Rates are significantly lower and there is a flat $15 fee for office visits. The POS plan provides well baby care, physicals and other preventative care that we have not been able to offer in the past. Those who reviewed the plans are excited about the new alternative. We need to have an extensive education program for the staff. In order to get this into place for July 1, 1995, we need to get Board approval at this meeting if possible. There are also computer changes that have to be made. Julie White, a partner in Slabaugh, Morgan and White, will be at the meeting to answer any questions that you may have. If you need to discuss this in greater detail, please call me before the meeting or we can discuss the program in the afternoon meeting and add it to the evening agenda. Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County of Roanoke requested bids to provide health insurance coverage for the County and School employees for the 1995-96 plan year. The bid requested a proposal on the basic comprehensive package currently offered as well as proposals for alternative managed care programs. The County received responses from seven companies. A team of County and School employees reviewed these responses with the assistance of an outside consultant. This year we selected Slabaugh Morgan and Associates to serve in the capacity of outside consultants for health insurance selection. The bids were very favorable reflecting the new competition brought into the Roanoke Valley by the emergence of HMOs in the Valley. The team is recommending a two tier approach be offered to the County and School employees. Tier one would be the current Trigon plan. This plan would be offered to the employees at the same cost as the 1994-95 plan. In addition, this year we would like to add an option for the employees to select the Trigon Point of Service Plan. m:\finance\common\board\ April 20, 1995 F-1 If the employee chooses to take this option, there is a cost reduction of ten percent of the basic comprehensive premium. A schedule of premiums is shown in Attachment A. As shown on this schedule, a County employee could get single coverage under the current Comprehensive Plan at a cost of $32.18 per month or could obtain coverage under the Point of Service Plan for $15.32. A County employee could get family coverage under the current Comprehensive Plan for $175.02 per month or could obtain coverage under the Point of Service Plan for $134.04. Attachment B and Attachment C outline the plan benefits of the current Comprehensive Plan and the Point of Service Plan respectively. Included in your packet is a separate booklet prepared by Slabaugh Morgan which analyzes the bids that were received. Page S graphically illustrates the financial impact of the bids. The Trigon Point of Service Plan was selected over the Trigon HMO Plan for the following reasons: 1. The Point of Service Contract offers a wider network of physicians and facilities. Carillion and Lewis Gale Hospitals are included in the plan as well as an extensive physicians network which includes both Carillion and Lewis Gale physicians. (A separate book of providers is also included in your packet). 2. The Point of Service Contract does allow the employees to access services outside of the network, but charges them a higher rate to do so. The HMO does not allow the employees to access services outside the network. 3. The Point of Service offers a "soft" way to introduce managed care to County employees. The benefits offered are the same as an HMO, but there is more flexibility for the employees. The savings to the County are substantial. Since this is the first time that the County and Schools have offered a managed care option, we would like to conduct enhanced education sessions during the month of May. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds needed for the County portion of the premium are included in the 1995-96 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting atwo-tiered health insurance plan including a basic Comprehensive Plan and a Point of Service Plan as outlined in the attachments. The School Board will be considering the same recommendation on April 27, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, f - Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator m:\finance\common\board\ April 20, 1995 ~' Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Dr. Deanne Gordon, School Superintendent m:\finance\common\board\ April 20, 1995 ~ , F- 1~ ~~ ` Attachment A County of Roanoke and County of Roanoke Schools Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield Health Insurance Renewal Rates Monthly County Employee Premium Bene tt Portion County Rates: 1995-96 Basic Comprehensive Plan Subscriber only 168.70 136.52 32.18 Family 409.94 234.92 175.02 OR Point of Service Plan Subscriber only 151.84 136.52 15.32 Family 368.96 234.92 134.04 1994-95 Basic Comprehensive Plan Subscriber only 181.94 149.76 32.18 Family 442.28 267.26 175.02 I School Rates: 1995-96 Basic Comprehensive Plan Subscriber only 180.32 148.14 32.18 Subscriber + 1 minor 265.07 155.62 109.45 Family 458.01 208.01 250.00 OR Point of Service Plan Subscriber only 162.29 146.97 15.32 Subscriber + 1 minor 238.57 155.62 82.95 Family 412.22 208.01 204.21 1994-95 Basic Comprehensive Plan Subscriber only 196.41 164.23 32.18 Subscriber + 1 minor 288.72 179.27 109.45 Family 498.89 248.89 250.00 04/12/95 insuranc\BCBSRATE.WK4 ATTACHMENT B ~ t CURRENT COMPREf,IENSI VF PLAN [.ifetime Maximum 51,000,000 Calendar Year Deductible Individual Family *waived for accidental injury Coinsurance Out-of-Pocket- Maximum Individual Family psychiatric Care/Substance Abuse Inpatient Outpatient ~• ~ Pre-Admission Review Prescription Drug Card 5200* 5400 ~` 80°1° 51, 000 52,000 30 days/calendar years 50% to 51,000 calendar year maximum 5500 non compliance penalty 55 Generic/512 Brand MORGAN 17 !~ A • • e e ~ a t • • ATTACHMENT C u' Doctor's Office, Emergicenter. Home Visit Wdl Baby Care Radiation Therapy, Chemotherapy, Renal Dialysis. IV Therapy X.ray, Tests, Therapeutic Injeciians, Allergy Shots Hospital FaciCity Care Physipl Therapy (51,500 calendar year maximwr+l Spinal Manipulations (5500 per calendar year! Ambulatory Swgery Cerrter Mental Health rnduding substance abuse! (51,000 calendar year maximum) Preventive. Screening A6MT (far advanced breast cancer) S 15 per visit no coinsurance 815 per office visit no coinswance; 20% coinsurance for tests: no coinsurance for immunizations 20% coinswance 20% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 20% coinsurance: S 15 per physician visit no coinsurance S 15 per fadl'ity visit 20% coinsurance; 815 per Physician visit no coinswance 20% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 209(, coinsurance; S15 per physiaan visit no coinsurance 50% coinuurance no coinsurance ZO% coinswance 815 Pei VISIt 30% coinsurance S 15 per office visit 30% coinsurance; 50% coinsurance for tests; 30% coinsurance for immunizations 50% coinsurance 50% coinsurance 830 per facility visit 50% coinswance; $15 per Physician visit 30% coinsurance 815 per facii'Ry visit 50% coinsurance; S 15 per physiaan visit 30% coinswance 50% coinsiuance 330 per facility visit 50% coinsurance: 815 per plrysidan visit 30% coinswanca 50% ce;nswance 30% coinsurance 50% coinsurance 13 ~„~~~~w ...,.. In-Network Out-of-Network Z ref Employee Pays In-Network Out-of-Network Home Health Care -Aide/Nurse Visits -Physidan Visits .. ...:.. :,`~:o~ew~roa..~.w,;;~a;;a~s~:w;:;.w,v r,:aa~w; Hospital Bed Patient Care (sani-private room, andllaries, intensive cue unit -365 days per confinement) Physiaan Care Skilled Nursing Home (100 days per calendar year) Mental Healttr, indudinq substance abuse (30 days per calendar year; 90 days per lifetime for substance abuse) :~6•+wYi•II:MS~~~S6n'(i~•:!.}}y~i(~Y~ .: • G Outpatient Private Duty Nursing (5500 maximum per calendar yearl Medical- Equipment (65,000 maximum per calendar year) Ambulance Services (53,000 maximum per calendar year) Oxupational Therapy (5500 maximum per calendu yeart Speech Therapy (5500 maximum per caiendu year) ~.h........ .. a aawrarac' Manx Medical Exoerise l i~ Oeduct(ble Qn-netwaric! Out-af-l~odcet (in-natworic) Deductfb(e (out-of-network! Out-of-Pocket taut-af-networkl no coinsurance S 15 per visit no coinsurance S200 per confinement ZO% coinsurance 20% coinsurance S50 per day for last 70 days S 200 per confinement 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance ZO% coinsurance 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance t00% 615 per visit 30% coinscuance 5200 per confinement 50% coinsurance 50 % coinsurance 100% S 200 per confinement 50% coinsurancx 20 % coinsurance ZO% coinsurance 20 % coinsurance 20% trance 50% coinsurance 5200 per individual; 5400 per famly 61,500 per individual; 53,000 per family 6200 per individual; 5400 per family 53,000 per individual; 66,000 per famdY 14 ~. ~.'~'~ ~- ~~ ~_ ~' ~~ ~,_ •_=: -a: ((~~n Vii''{: F-I Additional Hements prescription Oruq ilia Alternatives! Main Order Drug Program Retail Maintenance Druq Program Dependent Ape Hospital Admission Review lifetime Maximum Benefit Pre-existing Condition Waiting Period. Ne transfer of prior Blue Cross credit 3 12 for brand name; 3 5 for Qeneric 3 17 for brand name: S 5 far generic S 20 for brand name; S 8 for generic to age 19; students to age 23, end of year Required S1,000,OOa 90 days without medico! services for preexisting conditions (Ceases to aPplY after 1 Z months enrollmentf PAYMEiYT p~iCBVTAGES Capayment percentages are based on Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shidd's allowance for a partiwiar service ar the provider's charge for that service, whid7evet is less. When you receive qre within ttta Primary Care Physician (Network and Referral Network, the provider will accept the network allowable as payment-in-full. You are responsible far any coinswanea, copayment and deductible that apply to your health rare program. The amount your program pays is reduced by 30% for services performed by out-of-netwaric providers. However, if you are treated by a provider who partiapates in another Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shidd network. the cast of the servica~ wilt not exceed the allowable charge for that network. Except far any other provisions described in this outline, the following will occur. When services are reuived at a participating hospital, skilled nursing facility, or home health care agency, the amount which Trigon Blua Cross Blue Shidd is responsible to pay may be reduced due to Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield's negotiated payment arrangement with the faciliity. likewise. the coinsurance amount the employee is n~ponsible for paying also will be reduced to reflect similar savings. 15 ~...,.. F- i PREV131lT1YE CARE BHVEFi'fS WOMEN MEN ...:: ... .....:..: ................:::::::.ii fix:: n iiii:4:v:'ii'.^1J:: .....:..:.....:... .....:. ~:::............... +ir}i•:i 5t na :i: i:: i::i :::.::. _:::: ~::::: ::• :..........................:...i hv:: t._:: ~}:..n}v::::::: .v.'Si%•4'•ii'l.S:iiii; i:. i7:i^:::?e: i44:Jiv'+:.: ~::lK:i; }::$•: :v?FVy :4::-4:v....v. 'Stiff :: -. niv:SK•i iii 4ii:<tii: • w.:::.::'.. •.:.i,4:;:tj;:}'•i:5tw: m:;:; • • v w:::: xi::......t ........ ::nr•:r.:n:y::::.v....lv:nY. ~:S:i }iiv......:....r.•.~•v:. w.^. ::.•nw: vw:v i.•5: ...n ...... .........::.. ......•: •::::::. ~... a.:: :7•i::i:5~•i:•7:;7::::;; ....... i•. x..; .;}~+'... `''. .... rr. {...•.•. ....... vw....8x::::.iii }i: fill" ... µ. :::: ... n..... • ii:: r55•i4ii54::54y ~::::::.:: ~::.....'::.. .. M. Tsai. v •:v{{kvv.5+., :i:. v}:w n}• ~ v-.... ::.. •. vri:~: i:::...: is>r: iYiirii:::•SiiYri^`:•i is ........: .:: ;.v. :: ::.t ~;, •......: .n -.. ...... .::v •:{•:::. :::::: x; v. .:: pljji• .:::.:.,a`Y,..~~`p~~•~~~• ~/~~.i ..... v: fill: i:.•'!~.?•. ~:}. .......... ....... ~: Xv:: ~.... . ~ .•~....:.yhi^tv. ,: ..:..v}... , , . .~. :.vv.:::.~•'W lva...~t::{7RYW; ,,, ~ • S.i>i; .....:... ':.,• {.{iJr;y':niv: n}.V~; ~i ~Y.+: v ~{ 44 v..}E,w itN~C+:-...::4•.: :~'M'C•~ff 4: .v :ii.\v '; /~f iii:. ti... .;ti?.Lr ,. :i;jy;':. .+" '~:} v "~N v. k'{G f......... ~~;:: ••:•y. "iiY.:'4it•)C~:v`~"?~:•,J~G,.rr •,~ ~:i {mot};: ::•.y SC7i:i~vv ..::::: •. 74;:5;}:};Mv. ~{i:id;;[•• ~ •. .. ~^k?~}~^` ~v<"T.}`~i,S~,: ~~?,, : ~i.36::,~~'rv. ....v i]v,.:S~v {'Rlvvy ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . :::.. k:: ii: r;tiiti:•::. ...:;... ~ ~ m Bm o t (baseline)' 1 /year ca) Can t re as Pap Smear t lyear 1 /year t /year (Cervical Cancer) Fecal Occult Blood Test ~ /yam (Colorectal Cancerl Sigmoidoscopy or Barium Frema 1 tyear (Colorectal Cancer) Cholesterol Tests 1 /year 1 /year (Coronary Artery Disease) 81ood Presswe Tests 1/year 1 /year (Hypertension) 1/year Office Visits•• (For Covered Screening Services) ~ 1 /Y~ 1lyear uy~ I ~(~iC Q/7 f79) n ~~ ~ a ~roSfLt~2 3 ~q • one baseline mammography is provided dunng the five-year period from ages 35 - 39. •' Benefits for office visits cover one or two 30-minute (maximums office visits per year when done in conjunction with one or more of the covered screening procedures. 16 ~~ ~J i • C MORGAN & a s s o c i a t e s I 1 HEALTH CARE PLAN MARKET ANAL YS/S Prepared For u ROANOKE COUNTY AND ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS /. Executive Summary 7 //. Financial 4 • Decision Matrix 7 • Cost Comparisons of Current P/an and POS 9 p/an • R& C A//o wance Comparison 7 7 ///. P/an Design 12 /V, Recommendations 78 MORGAN 8 A t • o e i • t • s ' /. Executive Summary 1 Request for Proposals for Roanoke County and Roanoke County School Employees Health Care Plan were released on January 27, 1995. Bids requested proposals on the present Comprehensive benefit programs. Bidders were also asked to provide quotes for HMO, Point of Service and PPO plans. Bidders were asked to duplicate the current minimum premium funding arrangement and to provide aself- funding proposal. Seven carriers responded to the Request for Proposal: • Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield • Provident Life and Accident • Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. (MAMSI) • Partners National Health Plans of North Carolina, Inc. • John Deere Health Care • Wausau Insurance Companies • Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc. Of the seven carriers only four quoted the existing plan design: Trigon, MAMSI, BPA, and Wausau. Of these four, only two duplicated the present minimum premium funding arrangement: Trigon and MAMSI. A summary of the provisions included in each respondents proposal is included in this report. An insurance committee working with Slabaugh Morgan & Associates (SMA) developed selection criteria rankings and SMA evaluated each of the seven bidders. The criteria used were as follows: Factor Quality of Health Care Provided (Provider Network) Quality of Administration & Services Cost Offeror's Credentials Offeror's Responsiveness Total ~I Points 10 30 50 5 5 100 ' 1 ~ MORGAN S A a a o e i a t e a i~ Based on the review of each proposal the evaluation criteria agreed upon was used to rank each bidder. The evaluation also considered human resource and cost objectives of the County and Schools. Based on this analysis, Trigon was selected as the most responsive bidder, achieving 95 of a possible 100 points. MAMSI was ranked second with 77 points. 1 ' ^ munurrv L & A a a o c i a t e a Q Q 0 y ' ~O U ~,~ u l J 1 it N U U Z H c Z c Z ~ ~ ~ c ~ o ~ o m co ~ ~ U O Q a c `9 ~ ' c n 3 Z cr i c a Q ~ ~ ' ' > > ~ ~ ~ ~ a d m ~ Y O Y O ~+ ~ m J ~ C (0 O C f0 O O J ~ ~ Q V ~ ~ J ~ C o ~ m _ ` - d - d = C c ' U O m ~ = o ~ .r Z Q ~ ~ U C Q t17 f0 ~ - N O O y ~ C > ~ m f Q Q ,~ Q Q ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ r" aj d ~ C Q ~ N ~ o > `~ '~ 3 O ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ a 0 ~ ~ c ~ ~ y O ~ E ~ ° •fD U d J ~ U y ~ + °' I' ~ m` QQQ Q ~ '. M . C O Y :. C O C ac ~' a E ~~ O o ~ Q U 2 Q +. c °1 ~ E p H c. E .. - H w a~ ~ m " ~ ro: .~ o o ~ a ~ ~ m j `O J c a~ m © ~ ~ - 03 ~ ~ y Z p c E ~ ~ ~ u, ~ ~ c `~ g m c cn ,,: o c ~ ~ _a u y ~y~ m >.~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ n L H ~ GO = d ~ ~ ~ Q ~ (n Z O f L W . d r N M d' tt? t0 • M a 0 9 0 a r ' //. Financial Review 1 In the evaluation of the costs for the County and School's health care plan both ' fixed expenses and projected claims were analyzed. Fixed expenses include administrative fees, reinsurance charges and profit or risk factors. Projected expenses on the County and Schools separately and combined as well as the maximum liability under the minimum premium funding were reviewed. The starting point for the cost study was the existing plan design and funding arrangement. A summary of current (1994-95 plan year) and projected expenses (1995-96 plan year) for Trigon is: 1994-95 199 5-96 Coun Schools Count Schools Retention and Reinsurance 5349,701 5634,273 5347,466 5630,885 Expected Claims 51,935,303 53,479,231 51,745,610 53,104,175 Maximum Liabilit 52,285,004 54,113,504 52,093,076 53,735,060 The net results are a decrease in total expected costs: County: 8.4% reduction in costs or 5191,928 decrease Schools: 9.2% reduction in costs or 5378,444 decrease Combined: 8.9% reduction in costs or 5570,372 decrease A comparison of proposals from each carrier meeting the bid requirements are included in this section of the report. As indicated, Trigon is the low bidder when comparing maximum liability. Their fixed fees, however, are not as competitive. Total costs for the existing plan, POS and HMO compare as follows: & A s a o c i a t e a $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $s,ooo,ooo $a,ooo,ooo $2,000,000 $0 Comparison of Maximum Liability Current Plan $8,095,919 $7,666,132 eo won coo & A a a o c i s t e • Trigon BPA Wausau MAMSI '1 When analyzing the costs of each carrier an evaluation of the provider network reimbursement schedules was made. Each carrier was asked to provide cost data ' of 15 medical procedures. All carriers responded with the exception of Partners whose fee schedule is proprietary. ~, IJ ~' ~J ' C t9A1~ MGRGAN U & A s a o c i a t e s y V O V \~ V ' ~ C (~ •~ 0 ~~ L ' ~ 'i D~ Q w ,O V G ~ ~y O V 0 .- N N M N M O N ~ M ~ tV: N O 0 f N N N M ($ r- M N ~ M me; M N N ~ N M i~ M M N O M ~ M N N N ~ M M M N r- M ~ ~ N N r- N M ~ M M N ~ M ;.~ M N N N N M ! M M N ~ M M; N r- N .- N [t 41 M M N M M N ~ i fA O 'G LO C y ~:%ii: ''~::<' C ' V1 N U ?:: C d U ;n > a C L O~S .~. m ~ O :>:>: :::::. C O ~' y > Ou N ;:;'>': ::: :`>` C N ~ ~ Y O ww'~ ~ L y_ Y C aZS t0 O ~ E Y y O ~, Y OIL Y L Q Y '>:3::;: :: C ~ ~, !/1 d O +,W ~/~ N ti- ><'> fA p V U 'a.+ N td '4 L C O ,. E ~ O .~' ~= O O O O :: >::: +r y C T 0 :;:::< C t/) 9 _ r.+ - C C U Z O d o~ Z cn Z Z o~ z : o~ Q U C7 w~ ;!< U w . ., ::< w V w oC OQ O~~ >~> }UW N N N d' ::~ ;Y'` ~'~ ~' (A M M N ~ M M N Z '~ J ~ Q Q Q ~ < J Q~ Z ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~wp~ ::~y 000 ~p 0 d2d ;~ dQF- V 0 a m ~ O O N ~ M M N N: ~ : ~ .. ~ ', i O O O O ~ t.c) ~ N N: M to> Lh' C] ~ O 00 O N ~ ~ irl N >L~ ~ ~ '' tC '> W 00 O O N ~ to to ~ : it3 ~ ~'' ~ cfl ~ O ~ y in ~n ~n ~cr n ~' ~''' C', ~; ~ C ~ oo O to ~ ~ ~ tfr ~n '.~ C n a C ,~ I~ N ~ Ln ~~, t!7 to LL') iR~ ~ H '' O }+ y > U ~ rp, to C ~ = i L ~. ~, U p C 'C U i/i iii ~+ +~ U W~ ~ ~ p ~ L y ~~ O U~ p~ L C U' ~ '~' C U U 'I U p N U tl1 p p p p m y p m E U U :. ~ ' ' Qt` U N X ~ t0 (0 p U p C ~ ' ;' ~, W m LL ~ ~ `~- : p p .:: (~: C ca U w p t0 ~~ 7 C~ C ii ~ Q ` cfl ~, ~`v a L U U m acco C p N~ °~ m Q m L~ N w~y s 1. _ = y °'' "~'` C LL. = G1 U ~ . p X C p ~ ' m a i XL pL W E c p ~ N ' ~~ ~ W U l ;: :' ~ «- ti. ~+ a+ . C p ~ O N H o ~ J W J r ~ W ~ N l1~ lA p (AQ ~ F- ~ ' (nom m ~ (n (n y ~ te- ` OZ ~ OZo~SZ ~ v <ai? +~ c ~ W wD aw :iri ~ c ~ O O wa~4. ~ v~ gyp. ~ N :° < W ~ p cn cn W W W W ; 0. OU o . OoCZOC ~ H r .~ Q a 0 c~ c~ .~ .~ 0 L ±~ co m C O E 0 U a~ L O C ~O y (D N C U O C U 0 u 0 a ~ I J V ~ ~ w O ~ ~ U Yap Z V WO' L O ~ ~ ti ~ 4 ~ T Q = i •~ ~Ir ~ 0 U a Y 0 Q •- I~ ^ O v (D ~ N ~ rn co a~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ a o o ai O ~ ~ N ('7 V' to lA f0 fA fH _ N1 O N ~ ~ N _ O) CO ~ ~ ~ N o p ~ ~ N ~ O O S O M N N ~ ,~ 4. O O ~~, O N ~ ~ Q t ~ % ~ ~ O ~ O N r N (O lA ~ to D_ d ~ ~ ~ N ( N ~ ~ (9 fA r O N CO r `~ N O N O N C ~ O Vim' p) N t0 ~ (q d ~ O N ° om ~ v ~ ~n o ~ c~ o ~ ui ~ n ~ V ~ M~ O r . r 1~ ~ w ~ r ~ N r ~ V _ R ~ O (h M l~ ('7 t0 r ~ ~ ~ O N ~ O 7 OI ~ ~ O ~ ~ p p d 0_ ~ N F- O ~ ~ ~ o co ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ c tll N CO ° OD ° N rn ~ ~ O d ° ~ ° g . ~ ' O ' v c a ~r i ° ~ a ~ N N ~ O ~ ~ ~ n- O V d ~ N ~ M M co N p j E9 b4 ~„~ ~„~ _ ~ ~ ° ~ °o ~ `Y' a °e °O ~ O ~ rn ~ ~ ao ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ a U ~ ao r ao r o~ r ~ ch ~ r~ r' N (V ~ n ~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ C N N O M ~ ~ O r r o 0 ~- Y \ O _ r~ ~ M O M ~ O ~ ~ ~ O N •+ +~+ ~ (07 Q O ~ N 0 ~ Q ~ ~ 7 (7 N N N N o 0 ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a E O m a ° rn ~ °' v uNi o d n ~ .,,, c o ~ ,~ rn rn rn a o r- ~ ~ ~ a i o a c °o w O °1 F- N f0 ~ ~ ~ p ~ Y ~ r ^ ~ Q_ d ,~ N C7 '7 ~ ~ ~ f0 69 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ N M p ~ m g l!') co ~ °° o ~ `n p p ~ c ~ p ~ y a o o w O °' O V ~ ~~ M N N ~ Y ~~ ~ Q. w Q) (/~ ~ N ff1 r N C7 fh C7 lC ~ (~ F N O I~ O N ~ = O O t A ~ O O M oe O f4 N 4 ~ N ~ O N ~ O . O Y ~ ~ ~ V ~ f'7 Oi O N N (O ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ d N ~ n ~ N _ r r ~ ~ ~ ~ d V ` +'' y } V ~ d J d ~ ~ ~ ~ v = •' E ~ w ~ ~ ari at . is c d ~ x ~ R ` ~ a V ~~ ~ ~, ~ W c J J ~ ` U p ~ C • Q w to V ~ d O ~ ~ ~ O DD ~ O d! '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. E c ~ ~, o iQ o d d K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c d ~ m ~ 1° O x W M Q F- ~ x W ~ IL Q M ~ d Z m 0 U N d T O a N O O t U fD O N .0 C l0 .~'. C 7 O U O O (O C O .a F 7 N Q c N O `c W • 0 n J O Z V w U ~ ~ OO a ~ = W ~ o ~ ~ `a~i ~ T Q i a ~ U U Y O 2 0 ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ;Q ~ ~~ n° ~ ~ °- ~ 4. o°O I O r~ ,~ ai cp Sri ~ ao ao ~ r- Sri ~ F- ° °' i s v ~ ~ ~ ; ~ _ in ao v Q ~ N M o ' ~ ~ ~ O O .~+ lC t ~ j O N t N _N ' ' r ~- y ~ ( ~ ~ ' ) ~ ~ fH ~ ~ CO C7 ~ h ~ ~ (~ O d C ~ N ~ M f M ~ ~ d O ~ w N ~ Q U r Cn (O ~ ~ O In ~ h .- (h r r C'7 ~~ •' h ~ ~ N (V V- u~ ~ p O N~ (O ~ ~ ~ O (h ~ O ~ p 7 l(7 J `~ O N to ~ ~ ~ N ~ p ~ O ~~ Q Q N ~j E N p 'o O ~ c4 M c ~ ~ fA o d N c'e +~ ~ d r' ~ p N o~i C ~ M ~ O ~ N ~ ~ y ui _L ~ ~ o ,~ ~ ~ ~ c (n ° ~ ~ E 3 O N O N N O C Q ~~ ~ U 4 y N ~ N ~ ~ ~ • N dN E •c v N O U U d~ t0 C M ~ In 0 0 ~ ~ O an0 N COp ~ ~ 0 0 Y~ ~ a~ E ~ tD r d' f/1 O O l0 ~ w d ~ N O ~~ _ _ N ~ Q ~~ E ~ N j N V O N r N .- ~ N fA r N N d9 X U v> W C C C) ~ d OOi ~ ~ c0 f0 N ~ O .N- y C w ~ p M ~~ ~ '~ ~ O ~ p U'i 0 °~ p N ~ ~ ~ w ~ O ~ r.. ~ N ~ ~ Q ~ l1~ 7 N "' " N `~ a c~ CO ~" ~ °° E a E m O ~- O O O O ^ e ~ .. ~ c ~ aMO o ~ ~ a c °O C H O rn N rn rn ^ v ~ co N ~ r- tD m ~ ~ ~ ~ c *l ~ ~ ~ p O p ~ N O N m g Q i c p p> p ~ p `~. O O p C L M ~ ~ OD C ~ ~ ~ f~0 ~ ~ V ~ O c0 N N ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ fh (h F r+ ~ p ~ ~ O ~ O d O t ~ ~ N O R - a 0 O ~ ~ d O w ~ - ~ G U ~ O ~ O M . f~7 M r p~ O O tCj ~ ~ r- r- r- N ~ V v R ++ y } d J d m .~. ~ c _ ~ ~ O R E c ~ ~ J E '° iv ~ x ~ ~ ` a E ~ ~ d c ~ ~ a w~ ~i ~R d o ~, ~ a w~ o ~ w y ~ " ~ E c ~k. ` ~ ~ ~ R .. d .. ~ x ~ ~ +~+ w c m~i W to Q F~- ~ W ~ ~ R O ti Q (A ~ Z v a~ d 0 U H m d O a E m 0 0 L U N (O O N C l0 T C O U co tp c O a 7 Q c m E 0 `c W .. 4 0 a 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS /. Executive Summary //. Financial • Decision Ma tiix • Cost Comparisons of Current P/an and POS p/an • R& C A//o wance Comparison ///. P/an Design /V. Recommendations 7 4 7 9 77 72 78 & A • • o e ~ • t s • ' /. Executive Summary 1 Request for Proposals for Roanoke County and Roanoke County School Employees ' Health Care Plan were released on January 27, 1995. Bids requested proposals on the present Comprehensive benefit programs. Bidders were also asked to provide quotes for HMO, Point of Service and PPO plans. Bidders were asked to duplicate the current minimum premium funding arrangement and to provide aself- funding proposal. Seven carriers responded to the Request for Proposal: • Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield • Provident Life and Accident • Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. (MAMSI) • Partners National Health Plans of North Carolina, Inc. • John Deere Health Care • Wausau Insurance Companies • Benefit Plan Administrators, tnc. Of the seven carriers only four quoted the existing plan design: Trigon, MAMSI, BPA, and Wausau. Of these four, only two duplicated the present minimum premium funding arrangement: Trigon and MAMSI. A summary of the provisions included in each respondents proposal is included in this report. An insurance committee working with Slabaugh Morgan & Associates (SMA) developed selection criteria rankings and SMA evaluated each of the seven bidders. The criteria used were as follows: Factor Quality of Health Care Provided (Provider Network) Quality of Administration & Services Cost Offeror's Credentials Offeror's Responsiveness Total Points 10 30 50 5 5 100 1 ~7iL'iitii~~ munuHn ~~ 6 A a a o e i a t a a ' Based on the review of each proposal the evaluation criteria agreed upon was used to rank each bidder. The evaluation also considered human resource and cost ' objectives of the County and Schools. Based on this analysis, Trigon was selected as the most responsive bidder, achieving 95 of a possible 100 points. MAMSI was ranked second with 77 points. ~~ J ~~ ' I~ MVllUM1Y L & A s a o c i • t e s Q O m O O 0 V 1 Z U U ~ O d H ~ Z O C Z O f0 . p Q ~~ ~~ ¢ gy U O a ~ cn ~ cn z Q Q m ~ > > ~o (~ ~ d Q m ` ~ : ~ O N O y .~ N J C (O O '. C t0 O y J ~ ~ Q • ~ o ~ z° ~ Q ~ d U C Q ~ t0 ~ Q ~ N ~ r ~ 7 ~ m •~ cp U J co 3 _ ~ 3 ~ + aaa J a ` Q ~ o ~ _ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q N ~ p C •~ Y y ~ 3 O c9 U J ~ ~ F Q O ~ ~ C ~ ~ O c ~ E ' ° •fC U m d J a " y ~ + m` `. QQQ Q > O ~ O y C o O = C 3 ac f' o E ~ U p o ~ Q oC ac Q w C m m ~. E E ! o H ;:• ~ .E «. - ~ w m ~ ~' v c m ~ c o ~ a y m fD ~ aCi d O ~ o`~ ,t1 ~ Z E ~ H io ~ ip ~' y ~ ~ O ''e E c ~ .~ l~ c ° '~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ d to g • E .~ E ~ H ' c ' O ~ a ~ ' ~. ~ o° ~ m ~ ~ O a ~ • ~ m cn a LL a~ F- O x u, o a. = a ~ V ~- Q~v~ a O oc a ~ ~v eri ~ w to ch a 0 0 W a II ' //. Financial Review 1 In the evaluation of the costs for the County and School's health care plan both fixed expenses and projected claims were analyzed. Fixed expenses include ' ministrative fees reinsurance char es and rofit or risk factors. Projected ad 9 P 1 expenses on the County and Schools separately and combined as well as the ' maximum liability under the minimum premium funding were reviewed. The starting point for the cost study was the existing plan design and funding arrangement. A summary of current (1994-95 plan year) and projected expenses (1995-96 plan year) for Trigon is: 1994-95 199 5-96 Count Schools Count Schools Retention and Reinsurance 5349,701 5634,273 5347,466 5630,885 Expected Claims 51,935,303 53,479,231 51,745,610 53,104,175 Maximum Liability 52,285,004 54,113,504 52,093,076 53,735,060 The net results are a decrease in total expected costs: County: 8.4% reduction in costs or S 191,928 decrease Schools: 9.2 ;o reduction in costs or 5378,444 decrease Combined: 8.9% reduction in costs or 5570,372 decrease A comparison of proposals from each carrier meeting the bid requirements are included in this section of the report. As indicated, Trigon is the low bidder when comparing maximum liability. Their fixed fees, however, are not as competitive. Total costs for the existing plan, POS and HMO compare as follows: 4 ~~ ,. ~~ & A e s o c i a t e e 51~p0,000,000 c ,000r0~ 56A,000,000 ,000,000 52,000,000 50 Comparison of Maximum Liability Current Plan $8,095,919 57,666,132 tC AAA G7A & A s a o c i • t e • Trigon BPA Wausau MAMSI When analyzing the costs of each carrier an evaluation of the provider network reimbursement schedules was made. Each carrier was asked to provide cost data of 15 medical procedures. All carriers responded with the exception of Partners whose fee schedule is proprietary. L ~J ~~ 6 !7L'l~J 1~19G~ M V F1CiAIV ~I/il~l~ ' && A s as o c i a to t e ss 1 'w w+ O V j y V ~ ~ i,' O~ Z ,~ L ~ 'a V O ' Q it '~ ~ Q V 0 O .- N N M N M N ~ M ~ N O ~d 0 f N N N M : ~- M ~ ~ M ~ M N N ~- N M `~ M M N O M ~ M N N N ~ M M M N ~ M ~ ~ N N ~ N M aX! M M N M ,~ M N N N N M :~ M M N ~ M ~ N r- N .- N ~ ~ M M N ~ M ~', M N (n O~ ~ C N >:~>: N U : C N U V1 > d m U s:s< O m ~> >~> <' C ~ O O >~ N~ C to O N N N Q :::::'~: ;:;::. ~ ~ m ~ M :::> N O O '++ O t0 cC O ~ :«:::>: cp O Z V~~ Z (/) Z Z oC Z :::<::: ~ Q U C7 W U LL . ~.. C '' _ N W U W ~ U~ N N N d' ;~ HW ~~ M M O N r- M '" M N 1-=p F- - <:: H . Z o~S <t!~k :.... J J ~ lA a ' ,J ~ ~ :;: ~: ::~ F- N ~ W ~ ' O ?~~: ~ d=n. a dQF- a v 0 A Q Gd ~ O O N ~' ~"~ ~ N ~ tD ,. m < ' wi . . ~ ; ~ > O O O O 1lf in 'tn N N. M .. 'ee' >m, ~ S ', O 00 O N '' ~ ,,, * M ~''~ N ~ ~ ~. ~ "~ i? ; ' p ss 00 O O N M ~,,. In to ~ ~. CC 3 ' ~ ; cfl ~ O ~ ~ ~n ~' ~n ~?: ~ g ~ G< ' m.: ~ 00 O t1') ~ tf) ,~ Iii i13. O^ o- , . a. C a H ' ' O a.+ m C N C __ V O C R p y +-' O L ~ ~ '~ ~ N ~ O ~ L ' t 0 aN+ ~ ~ C C X O U p lC p~ p N O +- to d ~ U p LL C G J CJ ti ~ p O C a tC :.. p N~ , U .a t0 N (A p - C Q L a N m O x~ . ' +, m O Q m X L N L ~ L N O ~ ' ~ .D ~ p W LL E U ~. ~ m w- . W a.+ r. ~+ O t0 ° ~ ' ~ w c ' cn Q cn > m ai W ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ F- ~ _ ~ t/1 In li? V O Z O Z~ Z iL ~ ~ n ~ to . G: W ~ LL W * ' ~ W ~ ( ~ LL (A (A (n ~ +O+ , C' LL ~ ' p LL W W W © O t1 0 U Lf, 0 0G z~ a: H .~ d Q O .~ .~ 0 L cn p C O E E 0 U a~ L C f~ y fC N C _U +-~ O C U 0 0 a J 0 V y C ~ ~~ +.. °v°= Y a '~ 2 ~_ W Q '~ 0 y ~~ O ~ r O Q ~_ i '~ ~1.r ~O~ va Q r 1~ ~ ^ O v (O ~ N ~ rn v co °° a~ ~ o ~' ;°• O) c ~i ~ ao co co rn ° o ? a i a c ~ d Y F" ao ,~ pp N ~ ~ r ui ~ i a r n ~ .. ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ 69 d1 C N ~ ~ N O ~ O°0 ~ O ~ (n N ~ O O r O C7 N ~ N ~ Q d O O ..~ ~ l0 Q Z ~ j ~ ~ ~~ N r N ~ ~ r ~j d N r ~ ( N M ~ N ~ 69 r O N CD r r h N N N O d a ~+ ~ ~ ~~ _ O N ~ N d °° O ~ O N V `~° ~ ° ~' ~ ° ~ r l0 Y ~ r ^ C c - r fV ~ ~ r ~ U ~ r rn co co ~- ~ rn O N ~; °o °' O OI ° ~ ° ~ ~ c p ° m a ~ N H O r r I~ O co , e- r ~ Q- vi ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ w C b ~ CD CO N O ~ N f~ O N ° g ~ m o rn rn c ~ a ~ ° d > t r N ~ N ~ N 1~ d ~ o ~ d ~ j - 7 ( C '1 N ~ M ~ ~ , 0 ~ ~ ri CO (p r ~ O ~(j l0 a V ~ O CO O r t'1 r t~ r r r r N N ~ ~ ~ 7 O ~ r g~ o oo co co v°'i ~ o° a m d ~ N Q fh r O fh O O tp r ~ ~ ° d +~-~ ~ ° w E rtOi v °' n c°v d rn ~ (n Q r ~ ' C7 N N N N a o ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E a m ~ o ~ o ~ rn O v N ~ d ,o ~ n I FO- N (00 ~ O ~ ~ O r ~ ~ ui ~ d N ^ ~ ~ N fh ~ to tfj ~ ~ O ~ .. ~ V ~ •M- M O N t~ 0l d p p m 0 (D O aOD ^ ~ O I~ O O ~ °~ O ~ ~ N O O O V ~ ~ ~ ~ N ' N ~ ~ r ~ ~ 4_ N Q1 (n ~ r N ( 7 ~ fh ~ i-- 1~ r O tD O ~ ~ _ ~ ° nj O ~ r 0 ~ O O O~ M ('~ ~ ~ O fA N a' O° ' O y O N M O N O r ~ ~ r~ f0 r r ~ ff) ~ +" y } V ~ d J d I te ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ w q ~ r . M ~+ C ~ O a, _ ~ ~ __ ~ d O ~ ~ a J E d ~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ a v d~ Q' w ~, = W C J J ~ v o E _ . Q O V1 ~. ~ (~ O d O d ~ ~ OD A V O d ~ e0 d K ~ ~~ w O d X W to Q O F- d ~ X W R ~ 7 O) R ~ O 4. Q fn ~ a Z a~ d 0 U N a~ 0 n E d 0 O t U N (O O N_ C l0 T C 0 U (O ~O C O ~. F N f/1 Q C d O `c W .. • u 0 a J Q 2 V y Z ~ +.. C °v ~ W - o °~ oa Q ~ W O .~ o ~a``~ ~ T Q ~ L V w Z ~ v Y O Q O N CMO O V' O ~ O d w OI ~ ~ lA ~ ~ ~ ~ d C p w ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ rn_ O M c0 ~n ~ ap ~ ap ~ ~ ~j m ~ ~ ~ ~ b9 fp Q N ~ ~ m d' ~ - ° O ~ S (O ~ ~ _ d O l0 ~ ~ a V ~ N N O O (O ~ h to ^ ~ ~ N N M ~ ~ E A ~ ~ CO M h I~ M O ~ C N ~ M ~ M ~ ~ d O ~ w ~ r (O O C7 M ~ ~ r O N V m M ~ ~ ~ ~ M f- r~ g r ~ ~ ~ N N ~ fA O N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cNr1 O 7 lA J w ~I ~ O ~ ~ ~ N v N (O o fn OO ~~ CQ Q E ~ N M M ~ c o ~ ° ~~ r-n E ~ iH M (O 1~ fy ~~ O N M.., y 7 N N ~ O O N N N vJ w y~ 8 O p 0 ~ ~ n ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 O ~ t 3 N O ~ ~ ~ N O ~_ N N ~ ~ p ~ Q N ~j E N V~ ~~ E~ C O y ~ N N dN c E~ 'lp N N +- ~ ~ U M O O O O O tA O ~ ~ N O 00 d O E Q `~. O .~., ~ ~ G y :r C 1~ C 0 O {p N C ~~ N ~ Q N^ E a N~ N~ U O !- ~ N r- N ~ ~ N N N X U v> ~ fR W C C ~ ~ d O 119 ~ CO t0 N ~ p ~ C w ~ O ~„~ ~~ LI) ~ ~ sf r t[7 O ~- O ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ p d ~ E O ~~ ~ N O O Q ~~ w , ~ N M M N ~ ~ H ~ E a U 69 a E - m Of X 0 0 O m ^ 0 41 ;? I ~ c ~ ~ o ~ ~ n, c °O w O F- 00 ~ N O ~ M ~ O f0 N ~ r uj !C ~~ ~ ~ C ' ~ N U~ ~ ~ O ~ N O `7 m O C 0 rn NO t D M N ~ p i ~ O a O O ~ a ~ .- tf ~ ~ ~y N ~ N N ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ F ~+ N M N ~ to ~ N 0 ~ to O 1~ O y C ~ ~ N r a 0 O ~ M d O O « l0 ~ ~ U (~O ~ O M M M O O r ~j ~ I~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ni ~ d ~ } +• ~ c w a - °~ °' m d E .. a d J ~ ~ U E ~ ~ ~;; ~ ~ W c J E ~ ~ a :3y ` V R a1 O ~ ~ o Ol ~ V = ~- R i 0 d •X ~_ ~ V 7 y OD 41 W (p Q w F- .+ ~ W ~ ~ ~p O ti Q ~ ~ Z O a~ 0 U N m N ~+ O a E m 0 O L U N (O O N r C fQ C 7 O U c 0 a E Q c d E O C W 0 m u 0 Q I~ i~ 1 J O H V O O V Z ' Q [O N N r r- Q ~i ~ o ~ g g ~ ° o rn ~ ~ v ~i Po N 3e 8R O .- r O O O O O O O O O f`l f7 ~ ~ M 3 r °f g ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~OpJ ~ ~ n ~ ~ N ~ ~ h O IA N t7 Y t0 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ r .- 9 Q O f7 Q O S ~ r ~ ~ O ~ V ~ i(7 d L O ~Il ` 1 O .- N O O O O O ~ O G O (V ~ ~, M f0 t0 ~ - lJ ~ r r U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 55~~ ~ ~ ~ g 5~ QQ ~ ~ g cYi r ZS ~i ~ ~ f0 N N N r a 8i ~ ao M o g ~ ~ o gi o '~ c~ n ~ ~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ 2 O O .- O O O O O O O O O N M ~ r ~ ^' ~ C J h a oo ~ g ~ 1p~~ (O (O~ Ol aD '~ ~(pp f`~ f~ n' lpnp IA N 1pfp7 IA !O 1n N N to aD C ~ M f r lh ~ C 1 ~(1 r r In r f~ C 0 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O R ~ O O o ~ r ~ G O ~tl ~ ~ ~ ~ c r 1~ fh ~ Y In N r N Q ~ Q~Q O f~0 (O .- QQ 1(1 r ~ (O r h ~ C~1 N p O Q Q O O V O O A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d U a ~i ~ of ~ r~ ao ~ ~ " i ~ ~i c~ chi n ' cvNi Ci c ~' N E ~ ao v d u ri ~ n ~ g V ~ 11 f ~_ Ol Q ~~ a ~ w N o " ~j C c,t . H u ^ a LL o ~ r ~ v . ~ Z E ~ c N d v N ~ ~ T v _ Q d ~+ C t ~ a `" ~ y c ~ d > T ° v ~ u ~ C a , , o Q !g4 T c ~ ~ +r K d ~, b m o y ~~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ C_I ~ V C_ > o ~ a q E Y c v .T ~ E ~ a ~ ~ ~ o m n ~ ~ C w _ C m ~ 3 ~ ~ a ~ w ~p ~& d 01 N ~ f0 U C $ f~A U a L L y " O~ ~ c ~ V G N a . U VJ a° m i ao m > N U ~ > O m o6 o f >. a ~ ~°- ~ Q V a r ~' U 06 N 0 a w 9 w 1 ///, P/an Design The eneral satisf i g act on level of County and School employees on their health care ' plan is good. There is, however, considerable interest especially among School employees for wellness and preventive features. These are typically coverages provided by managed care plans such as Point of Service and HMO. In an effort ' to respond to this need it is recommended that a second plan option, a Point of service program be added for employees to choose. Two options, therefore, the existing plan and POS plan would be offered. A POS plan is a managed care program which provides a hi her level of ben fi 9 e is for services managed by a primary care physician. The plan design encourages ' outpatient utilization and provides coverage for certain preventive screenings and wellness programs. The POS also provides a lower level of benefits for employees electing services outside the network provider. A summary of POS benefits is ' provided in this section of the report. 1 12 ~~ ..._.._..._ ~.~ & A e a o c i s t e e Employee Pays In-Network Out-of-Network Radiation Therapy, Chemotherapy, Renal Dialysis, IV Therapy X-ray, Tests, Therapeutic Injections, Allergy Shots Hospital Facility Care Physical Therapy (S1,500 calendar year maximum) S 15 per visit no coinsurance S 15 per office visit no coinsurance; 20% coinsurance for tests; no coinsurance for immunizations 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 20% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit no coinsurance 515 per facility visit 20% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit no coinsurance S 15 per visit 30% coinsurance S 15 per office visit 30% coinsurance; 50% coinsurance for tests; 30% coinsurance for immunizations 50% coinsurance 50% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 50% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit 30% coinsurance S 15 per facility visit 50% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit 30% coinsurance Spinal Manipulations (5500 per calendar year) Ambulatory Surgery Center Mental Health (including substance abuse) (51,000 calendar year maximum) Preventive Screening ABMT (for advanced breast cancer) 20% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 20% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit no coinsurance 50% coinsurance no coinsurance 20% coinsurance 50% coinsurance S30 per facility visit 50% coinsurance; S 15 per physician visit 30% coinsurance 50% coinsurance 30% coinsurance 50% coinsurance 13 Employee Pays In-Network Out-of-Network Home Health Care -Aide/Nurse Visits no coinsurance 100% -Physician Visits 515 per visit S 15 per visit no coinsurance 30% coinsurance ll~P,~L~t~ISCF''S>~RV 1Cf:S Hospital Bed Patient Care S200 per confinement S200 per confinement (semi-private room, 20% coinsurance 50% coinsurance ancillaries, intensive care unit --365 days per confinement) Physician Care 20% coinsurance 50% coinsurance Skilled Nursing Home S50 per day for 100% (100 days per calendar year) last 70 days Mental Health, including substance abuse 5200 per confinement 5200 per confinement (30 days per calendar year; 90 days per 20% coinsurance 50% coinsurance lifetime for substance abuse) MAJ4~ MEDICfxL BpsltS {Subject tv )UFa;or Med}cai<DeduEiible~ Outpatient Private Duty Nursing (S500 maximum per calendar year) 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance Medical Equipment (55,000 maximum per calendar year) 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance Ambulance Services (S3,000 maximum per calendar year) 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance Occupational Therapy (S500 maximum per calendar year) 20% coinsurance 20% coinsurance Speech Therapy (S500 maximum per calendar year) 20% coinsurance 50% coinsurance Maior Medical Expense. Limits Deductible (in-network) Out-of-Pocket (in-network) Deductible (out-of-network) Out-of-Pocket (out-of-network) SZ00 per individual; S400 per family S 1,500 per individual; S3,000 per family 5200 per individual; $400 per family 53,000 per individual; 56,000 per family 14 Additional Elements Presuiption Drug (Rx Alternatives) Mail Order Drug Program Retail Maintenance Drug Program Dependent Age Hospital Admission Review Lifetime Maximum Benefit Pre-existing Condition Waiting Period No transfer of prior Blue Cross credit S 12 for brand name; S 5 for generic S 17 for brand name; S 5 for generic S 20 for brand name; S 8 for generic to age 19; students to age 23, end of year Required S 1,000,000 90 days without medcal services for preexisting conditions (Ceases to apply after 12 months enrollment) PAYMENT PERCENTAGES Copayment percentages are based on Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield's allowance for a particular service or the provider's charge for that service, whichever is less. When you receive care within the Primary Care Physician Network and Referral Network, the provider will accept the network allowable charge as payment-in-full. You are responsible for any coinsurance, copayment and deductible that apply to your health care program. The amount your program pays is reduced by 30% for services performed by out-of-network providers. However, if you are treated by a provider who participates in another Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield network, the cost of the service will not exceed the allowable charge for that network. Except for any other provisions desuibed in this outline, the following will occur. When services are received at a participating hospital, skilled nursing facility, or home health care agency, the amount which Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield is responsible to pay may be reduced due to Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield's negotiated payment arrangement with the facility. Likewise, the coinsurance amount the employee is responsible for paying also will be reduced to reflect similar savings. ' ~~ 15 PREVENTIVE CARE BENEFITS WOMEN MEN Mammography (Breast Cancer) 1 (baseline)' 1 /year Pap Smear (Cervical Cancer) 1 Jyear 1 /year 1 /year Fecal Occult Blood Test (Colorectal Cancer) 1 /year Sigmoidoscopy or Barium Enema (Colorectal Cancer) 1 /year Cholesterol Tests (Coronary Artery Disease) 1 /year 1 /year Blood Pressure Tests (Hypertension) 1 /year 1 /year 1 /year Office Visits• • (For Covered Screening Services) 1 /year 1 /year 2/year Fecal Occult 61ood Test (Colorectal Cancer) 1 /year Sigmoidoscopy or Barium Enema (Colorectal Cancer) 1 /year Cholesterol Tests (Coronary Artery Disease) 1 /year 1 /year Blood Pressure Tests (Hypertension) 1 /year 1 /year 1 /year OffICe VISItS•' (For Covered Screening Services) 1/year 1/year 2/year ~oS'fn.~2 .7~Cl~~C Qi7~q) /~ t~s~ /~~ • One baseline mammography is provideded during the five-year period from ages 35 - 39. • • Benefits for office visits cover one or two 30-minute (maximum) office visits per year when done in conjunction with one or more of the covered screening procedures. 16 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Lifetime Maximum Calendar Year Deductible Individual Family *waived for accidental injury Coinsurance Out-of-Pocket Maximum Individual Family Psychiatric Care/Substance Abuse Inpatient Outpatient Pre-Admission Review Prescription Drug Card 51, 000, 000 5200* 5400* 80% 51, 000 52,000 30 days/calendar years 50% to 51,000 calendar year maximum 5500 non compliance penalty 55 Generic/512 Brand 1 7 6 A • • o e ~ • t e s /V. Recommendations Based on the evaluation of the competitive bids for health care services, the ' following recommendations are offered: 1. Change plan design to a dual option plan where employees can elect the ' existing benefits or Point of Service program. 2. Change pharmacy card network to Coordinated Care Network (CCN). This offers a 1 % or 558,000 reduction in costs. In Virginia 94.3% of pharmacies participate in the CCN network and 89.2% participate nationally. 3. Accept Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield's proposal which includes: • Continuation of minimum premium funding arrangement with a reduced risk charge from 3.0% to 1.7% of total net claims. ' Guaranteed service levels with a financial nal for erformance below • pe ty p pre-defined standards. Trigon has agreed to place 10% of their administrative fee or 528,000 at risk. • Holding administrative fee for Comprehensive plan unchanged for 1995- 96 contract year and accept rate increase guarantee on administrative expenses of CPI or 5% whichever is less. • A maximum limit on the rate increase for the 1996 renewal of 9.0%. Accepting these recommendations will generate a total savings to the County, Schools and their employees of over $620,000 plus guarantee that costs for 1996 will not increase more than 9% [1996 costs, therefore, are guaranteed to be less than the present health care expenses]. 7 J i 18~~ o.....c...~.'~`~ i i L C L L A-42595-1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE_ April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred for the Citizen Bulk/Brush Self-Haul Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS- ~L,~,.~r~y~ ~"'~°~ ~~~~ ~~a~/ ~~~ - ~ EXECUTIVE SUNII~fARY In response to the tremendous increase in requests for collection caused by the ice storms of 1994, Roanoke County initiated a program to allow County citizens to haul up to a pickup truck load of material to the transfer station free of charge. The program began in April, 1994 and was described in a report to the Board on April 26, 1994. During the summer of 1994, Roanoke City and the Town of Vinton began providing the same service to their citizens on July 1, 1994. The public information campaign conducted by the three participating localities has increased awareness and usage of the free program. Also, during the Fall and Spring months normally associated with higher volumes, the number of users has increased. SUI~II~iARY OF INFORMATION The program was initially implemented to aid with disposal of the tremendous amount of brush that resulted from the ice storms of 1994. However, the program has since expanded to include any normal material that may result from a residential clean up. Such items may include furniture, white goods and other household bulky materials. Due to the volume of material resultinq_ from the storms, and the concentrated public education program, there was an initial surge of usage by the citizens. These increased levels have remained. The costs, tonnages and number of participants to date are listed below with the last three months of costs estimated. COSTS TON5 ,~ July $7,266 158.60 599 August 8,861 179.58 686 September 8,206 179.73 619 October 9,134 195.43 616 November 7,186 154.68 569 December 6,190 130.11 531 January 4,793 93.99 388 February 4,549 92.92 353 March 8,326 175.19 734 April 9,400 May 9,400 June 9,400 TOTAL $92,711 Attached also are Chart A, Annual Disposal for the years 92-93 through 94-95, and Chart B, Comparisons far the same period. FISCAL IMPACT• F-~ Cost Comparisons Actual Tonnage To date with staff costs incorporated, the total cost of the program is $98,608. The staff time associated with the program is the Coordinator's time ($3,913) spent developing and monitoring the program, as well as the call-taker's time ($1,984) spent responding to citizens questions and concerns. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that General Services be reimbursed for the costs associated with the citizen self-haul program. SUBM~ ED BY: William J. Rand III, Director Department of General Services APPROVED: ,, C~-~/ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson to approve and that the program be continued into the next fiscal year No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File William J. Rand, Director, General Services Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance CHART A ANNUAL DISPOSAL COS i COMPARISON (with 1=Y94-95 Apr-Jun proje~e~ 51,600,000.00 ~1 d^5_n31.65 $1,400,000.00 51,200,000.00 51,000,000.00 5800,000.00 Sc00,000.00 S~ce,00o.00 52ca,oca.ao Sa.oo zen Self-Haul ram $92,711.30 ® FY 92-93 ® f"Y °3-94 ~ FY 94-95 CHART B ~~ ~.~~IJ ~r E-~ ~1 ~ ~ ~-' M '~ U 4•~ ~*'' O O .~ .~ ^~^ I..~.I O 00 M M 00 ~--~ O~ N O~ O O M ~O v1 ~ d' ~O .-r O~ G1 .-~ O O N 00 O~ O~ ~i ~h O ri N vi vi v'i vi vl [~ ~ ~ ~ M U O~ [~ 01 ~ ~ G ~ •--~ ~ ~ O ~ ~t ~ H ~ ~ + G ~ 0 0 0 0 Vl V7 v1 O N 0 0 ^' '""' O O A f+1 00 ~ M I~ ~' ~O 00 ~Y O O ^" ~ M O N M ~ y Frl ~ ~ ~--~ ~O 'ct ~O O M O~ N O O N ~ ~ N ~O O M o0 O~ O~ ~ N O O M 00 N r. ~--. r-. ~ to M ~ ~t ~ ,N 9 00 00 O~ l~ ~O ~ 'CI' 00 Q~ ~ 6 ~ 69 ~ ~ ~j O ~"~ ~ M o M ~ ~ v ~ rn o ° ~ V ~ N ~ ~ ~ M M ~ v1 ~ ~ ~ 00 00 N ~O M ~ N O i ~ ~ o M ~ rl [ ~ v O o I ~ . ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >. ~ r b 9 F I+1 C/] ~--~ ~ Q o~ rn ~ ~ U ~ v1 O N ~O O~ [~ M O O~ O ~O O~ N l~ ~ 00 ~ O 00 O O O ~' ~' O~ ~~" ^ - o ~ M ~ V ~ v1 G~ N O~ l~ ~ 00 l~ O~ O v~ ' a ~ ~ ¢ ~ 00 [~ ~ 00 00 M ~t l~ ~ ~/'1 N M M ~ '~ N Q ° ' . v1 N .-. M 00 N ~t N ~O N ~D N M N Q~ ~+ ~ N N M N M E y a ~ a ~ ' n. O Q ~ 3 O ~ .3 ~O M M 00 ~O N ~o N O~ [~ ~ ~ ~--~ M N t~ ~' ^ M 00 ~ M !t ^, [~ ~--~ ~ 00 M ~O 00 M O N 00 ~O ct N M ~7' oo '--~ O [~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ oo N N t~ 0 M ~ ~ ~ 69 l~ 00 00 I~ I~ l~ [~ ~D r,,, ,-, ,~ b R M ~ N ~ O O N ~' p ~-. ~ p [~ ~ ~--~ ~ ~ N N ~O ~ ~--~ M ~7 [~ 00 ~O [~ O '"" ~' O~ ~O ~O 00 O tt ~O V1 ~O N ~ N O~ vl V7 [~ ~ .--. N ~ O~ N ~ M N [~ ~!1 [~ M Q~ ~ M N ~O Q~ N N N N N N N N M N M O O ' N N N ~ ~ O O v ~ O O ~n O ~n ' ~ O O M O ~ [~ 00 ~ M v t ~ , ~ ~ N ~ N ~-+ O N ~ ~ M ~ N ~ N 00 ~ [~ 00 ~ ~--~ 00 M N Vl ~ M V) V1 O~ V r-' l~ ~!1 M M O~ 00 ~ M N ~ ' ~ ~ N ~O ~ O~ oo ~n o0 ' '~ b.9 ~''~ ~ "'~ ~ y~ ~ t v~ ~ ~ V M N M ~O V 1 1 a Q~ ~ O O ^~ O O O O O O O O O O O "" O A vii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~''1 ~''~ V ~ Gq ~ N ~O M ~O ~ ~ N ~ a\ O~ . ~ [~ M 00 v1 p L - ~ ~ M ~O M '--~ M 00 ~ D1 N O~ f`1 ^ y„ N N N N N N ~ z 0 F A * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H O O ~ v, ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ r N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ti d i O Z A ti w ~d ~ ~ ~ rn " r - ,,~ A-42595-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Approval for Donation of Surplus Personal Computers and/or parts to Craig County Public Schools COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : DGrt~:~"r"~ " ~~~ BACKGROUND: Craig County Public Schools contacted us on April 4, 1995, requesting donation of any surplus computers or computer components (Attachment). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Six "8088" PCs and/or parts, have been surplused by various County Departments. The Management Information Systems department has examined these machines and made them available to County departments and County Schools and there has been no interest in the equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: If offered at auction it is estimated that these machines, in total, would be worth $100. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative #1: That the Board approve donating these six PCs and/or parts to Craig County Public Schools. Alternative #2: Offer these PCs and/or parts in the April 29th auction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends donating these six PCs and/or parts to Craig County Public Schools. ~-3 Respe tfully su fitted, Approved by, Elaine Carver Elmer C. Hodge Director of Procurement County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement ,+ ~~ ~~ BOARD OF EDUCATION JAMES L CADY, Chairman TOMMY A. ZIMMERMAN, V-Chairman BONNIE E. HUTCHISON HELEN A. LOONEY KAREN H. SOUTHWORTH Mr. John D. Willey Property Manager County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24014-079$ Dear Mr. Willey: +' OF CRA/C~ `.~. ~~: ~~ ~~ ,•v n3~ P. 0. Box 245 New Castle, Virginia 24127 Phone (703) 864-5191 Fax (703) 864-6885 April 4, 1995 s~ko o~. s ~-~ M. DALLAS HELEMS Division Superintendent VIRGINIA S. GIVENS Clerk of School Board Thank you for talking with me recently by phone concerning surplus property. As I indicated, Craig County Public Schools would be very interested in receiving from Roanoke County surplus equipment (i. e. computers, monitors, disk drives, etc.) that have been replaced with more modern equipment. We would be able to use these older computers in a variety of ways in our classrooms. If there is a required procedure or form that needs completed in order for such transfer of equipment to occur, please let me know. Also, if you need additional letters of support for this request, I would be glad to have those sent from our school superintendent and county administrator. Sincerely, , ' ~ l%zZls~ !l/~ G Donald J. Ford Assistant Superintendent, Instruction ~~~i~ ~oJ7~-~= ~~TY P UBL jC- GO A-42595-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER r~ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Approval for Sale of Surplus 1973 Ford Tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department G!~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : D~~'~""u~' ,mow BACKGROUND: Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department has contacted us requesting that we sell them this surplus 1973 Ford Tanker. They have a wrecked tanker and want to utilize this chassis in the repairs. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Fire and Rescue has surplused a 1973 Ford L-8000 tanker. This tanker was taken from service when "Wagon 10" was placed at Mason's Cove as a replacement vehicle. FISCAL IMPACT: Past experience has shown that this type of equipment has a minimal salvage value and that the offer of $3,500 made by Eagle Rock far exceeds what could be expected from an auction or other competitive situation. ALTERNATIVES' Alternative #1: Sell 1973 tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department for $3,500. Alternative #2: Offer 1973 tanker in April 29th auction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends selling this tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department. `, Respe fully submitted, ~~.r~ ~LiC,/L~f./w~ Elaine Carver Director of Procurement Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) F-Y Approv d by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement ACTION NO. t /~ ITEM NO . ~ I "" tL7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I do have some concern about Item 5 not going through the Blue Ridge Parkway process that Boone and Musselwhite have used. Although this project is farther from the Parkway than the 11 viewsheds that have been identified, it is very close to the Musselwhite project. If it is not handled properly, it could cause delays in getting a decision from the Parkway to extend utility service and may enlarge the scope of the environment assessment for the Musselwhite project. Both developers who have worked through the new process with Parkway sta,,~`' have been very pleased with the outcome and I believe that Mr. Ferguson would be also. BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for May 23, 1995. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kenneth McNeil. 2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of School Board of Roanoke County. 3 ) An ordinance to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Mullins. ~~ MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~S OFFICE. 4) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. 5) An ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. 6) An ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R- 1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for May 23, 1995. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 6, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ., o~ _,.F _~" COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ~ ~y For staff use only ~~J7 ~. ~~ f date received• received by: appli(ar}i n e: ~W~ 4 PC(BZA da :~ pla rds i ~ c~,: ca BOS date: Case N tuber: J~~ ^-~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Kenneth McNeil CfO Eo N wTT ?o QOyC 2ooc° 8 Phone: 774-0015 Ro q.+o1F°'v°' 24065 Address: 7210 Franklin Road, Roanoke, Virginia Zyo~$ Zip Code: Owner's name: Kenneth McNeil Phone: 774-0015 Address: 7210 Franklin Road, Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24065 Location of property: 7210 Franklin Road Tax Map Number: 114.00-01- 11 & 12 k VA 24065 e, Roano Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning Area: Clearbrook Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-2-C 2.62 ± acres sq.ft. Existing Land Use: Antique Shop Contractor's Storage Yard Proposed Zoning: AV ............................. Foi Staff Use Only Proposed Land Use: Antique Shop Use Type: Contractor's Storage Yard Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES g NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REOUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES R NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO x ::_:: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. nrs v ws v ws v X Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan X Application fee X Application .,. Metes and bounds description ''%.. Proffers, if applicable Justification `~ Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and con ent of the o r. ~`~ Owner's Signature: ~' GG /~/. G f Fvr Staff Use Only: Case Number ~"~ 1 Applicant Kenneth McNei 1 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-31 as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The rezoning will enable a piece of property which has been used for commercial uses for approximately 20 years to be zoned in accordance with its existing use. The property was zoned B-2 Commercial under the old ordinance and was simply carried over to C-2 Conditional at the time of the adoption of the new ordinance. All of the property surrounding the area is zoned agricultural. A commercial use has existed for a period of 20 years. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Rural with the special exception which would permit the requested with the comprehensive plan than is the existing zoning. Village. The AV zoning se is more in conformity Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. 'The rezoning will have no impact on property itself inasmuch as it will simply allow the existing uses on the property to continue. The existing uses have been on the property since approximately 1990. ~~ 131 9 P,6 01937 . , ~ ~ = D , \q~~ ~Q A/~XL fin/ _ - ~~. `~~F ~57~ \ \ 1 ~\ a ~ + ;, H u1\ \01 ~ : G" N O~ii\ \ m c_ D fS O . . tj.i. h \ \ \~~ z1.1~ ~ ~O • ~ S~~ ~ N ^.~ i ~, e ~ s y. r~ f,IAHE ~ 4~ ~ \ ~t~ \ r n " py,lE L{.1I~ h Q,~lLLhJG ~~~ \5 t y ~ M iu Guo ~,. ~~.t //~ 0 / S~ W ~ ~ ~ O cL ~ e p ~ ~ E ,= 9 FR. ~O ~ ~. V ~ j ~~oE7ac Q ~o ° " o \ ~ , _ N Q~ ( ~ p N ~ V o-~a. P,a,rr ~ ,~ ~ m / 72 Ate. ~ 4 ,~ Z . ~. w ,,~ . `~.. c~ CW ~Pn/E C /92.92 ~ \ N1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 0 z ., ~ x~i k Q ~0 ~ Z G Z AGRES TyT~'L ~,, - ,,~ePr ~ .P/G~-oF - W.tr j~ D SPR~~,/CaJ \ N ~ ,~ ~** 2 ~ Jam!` 0 s ~ ~' ~ -~ app N~,y. _ L'~E~ ~ ~ ~. /32.x' .3p • ~d ~9 ON vo m"~~ ~ ~ c~ oo ~ h ~ ~~ ~~ / ~~ / ~P~ ~Q.oh ~ ~',o1~t l l `~ ~ o 0 0 ~/~~ q i 2 ~~~tiv '~ y aJ~v ~. PG•q/a ~~ ~ ~2¢Z ,~- ,Ax. . v~ ~~;;M . O, ooi `,k. !E6v4L QEfERE,JCE oa /085, Pao. ¢¢5 'O.6./070,Pc5./67 ti/O,E: THE Sr/ia.!/ECT PRoPERTr /s NoJ LxATED /N .SPEC/i1L fLgop f/AZA,PD Zain/E5 f{"OR ~" fi15 LL~S/G~/ATEO ~rTNE SECRETARY Of /'Fx/5~./G A~/O L/a~q.W QE/ELaPMF/f s~,e%y Foe ~Ert/.t/E~f/ G/. /~G'iyE/L OF A 2. !0 2 ,qce~ (T~1AL~ T~zAcT SiTuATe AT Ti,iE ,~uT.dw~ sT /NJEQSECT/Or/ Of U. S. ,ej. a~` I20 A~/O //1. SEGO,VLtgRy ,QJ ,# 9G}~ "' ~C~`"' 4~L /N Ts/~ C'A/~ SPR/~/G MAGiST~~e/AL ~~SjR/~T ~,ACK s. If SS .QO.Qn/O~C~ CD. , ~RG/~/,4 EY ~cALE : /" _ moo' MAQcf/ 7, i99o U ERTIFiCATE Ib. 3~~ J.4cK G. mss 9~~~ 1070 ,~.~~ Ce~e~%ifi~o Gs+,vo St/,e~/E:yoe ,~~ LAND 9~P N. L3. W-/23 D 90262 ~~ 4 NORTH ~ / ~r~ 6.66AC 2C+C:cSq~ son 29 ~' ,,-,~ E6.1 /82 ~. 38:.c;C) 31.1 770/ IA2AC '' 14 S,t•~ l50 4.83 At a°w3\.. 28 `t9~ •.. 9E i E4 ~ s ~ 6p 82. - ..~. +`°"• 82.2 6 Z •b1 33 ^34i~~i ~ '• a' 7l0 /!~ saw 63 9~i 6.86 Ac t01 \ w 11 1.9 3.86 Ac ~r 7 tot ,,' 65 66 819 Ac 1G dsya u. • . •. SSAe sa12 // ` • Si ac 101 yob \ 41' ~ ~ Lseac~64.3 3sractu off, 6I ssee ~/~ +~~ 36 s 64.1 ••'•. ~ zss,~ 1 3.6SAC $? 7tT 1 S.00AC O 6d1J •••~ ~A 6S .... ~ 42 Gm ~ uec '6tT ~ ?~ ~~j~SAC •.:~~~~ 5si~ `t15{ r. 34 At 7.%ae '~ ~ 2.4t - CoV 9 Ae 60 -~-- 60 • dlerz ~ii7eelq ~ ~ =59 ° ~ )6d . 6y~ ,... 67 3.06Ac i d.n Js y• tM 62 ' r/7J :~ sQ,!iAC Oo dlos T.03Ac 1 67.1 44_ •'4 ~.~ ., ~ ti JJ .tex / h'S 71 • i 2.RaAe _ 61 457i!! •~,~' ,' ti. ~ v u 70 68 369Ae 46 ~•>.'~ ,k~~ i 11.30AC 1600 ACiD) B 67 66 B.SOAe ;• 80 ~ •;,d c+ 2.• 1430ACtC1 ~ ps.aeAe r3o 47 .~ I.IaAt Tlea,~~°~ T5.1 'D .,... 5.64 Ac I s` IO.BOAc ~ 7zss ~ ••,+ • • 1 . 2+~ ~ 2.I9 ~ ~3 . 4pdectq ~ d< t6(S 496 .>+') 76 ~' ~ 68 l17Ac ~,.• -- a~ ism a '.. 63 ~ ~ z.itAe s!s 74~. 69 ~ 104.00 J' : 31.65 trs 1AO 17Ae 2Jp 'S.76At nnn//! ~owo.'clq 2 ~. 2 r•~ ~;rte, 6 s dot` ~ 79 T'~.PJ - dss~ dst7 w ~ y .1 ~ 7T r. 8 ,, .4•.+ ~ ++. .. ~ ~ G62Ae 13 ~ ? i r ... +~! ~ X84 e s. ~ 8 - dsav b 4 ~. 3, s?~ ~' 12 ~ vci~q ~ ' , ~ 81 IOOAC Is~Ate ~. 1• , oa In ~• ~~V ~~ 4 2 9 0 _ 6 ' 30Ae • ~~•; ~ ~•R71 ~r~o ~' b ' sJOS.23Ae 44.SIAc ~~"~\ 13 57.39ACtD1 3498AC1C1 j ~ • ~ 13.1 369Ae ~ ' 4;3Ae ~ 7JJd 3 ` \~//- 6 4 ~ ~ ~ / ` 1. z , Ac I 7+ 8.68 Ac . ~ ~~~ 7350 ~~ 1 721910 ~ / IAc ID T.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6.a8 Ac~s . a~c ~~ tp• ' 4 y`c 229ec i ~s 2 .41 0O / . • 40 3~ 73j7 7Jf! 42.1 I.a ssw .; sJr! 43 / 9.22Ac I TJJ~ / 7~ s 16 rJe~ ,~-3 , 16.ISAc 2.32 AC 20.OOAc SA dow Hollow Ln. 22 IS.43 Ac rJld 6.IOAc ~CaV 29 q.00AC IDl SD4AclC~ I 32 60.00 Ac IDI • 69.07 Ac tC1 38.09 Ac 31 18.10 Ac lDJ / •n of e. tct _ ~~* DEPARThfENT OF PLANNING KENNETH MCNEIL AND ZONING TAX MAP # 114.00-01-11, 114.00-01-12 •. ,t~ i_ •, COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date rec ive ~ / received by: a lication fee: ?CrBZ:.~'a~! placardsy~sS/e~,; ^, (305 date: Case Number: y / / Check type of application filed (check alf that apply): Cl REZONING ®SPECIAL USE []VARIANCE Applicant's name: School Board of Roanoke County Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.W., Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24019 . Owner's name: School Board of Roanoke County Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.td. , Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24019 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 54.02-4-1, 2, 3 4 45 9 rSalus Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: G.teR.i~ r Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 93.6 acres 4,194, 828 sq.ft. Existing Land Use: Glenvar High School "~-'~ Proposed Zoning: No Chan e - R-1 g Proposed Land Use: No Change -High School ..................Y........ For Statf Use On! use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES xxx NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES xxx NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO xxx ;:~:: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v x Consultation x 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application x ''r,. Metes and bounds description / Proffers, if applicable x Justification x Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners ' /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and~onsent of the owner. Owner's Signature: • • ~ - .For StaN Use On/y: Case Number ~® 0~, Applicant School Board of Roanoke County - The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This Project involves the much needed expansion of one of Roanoke County's Public High Schools. The 41,000{ square foot addition at Glenvar High School further facilitates the need for adequate school space and will provide ample area for various classrooms and offices. This addition also facilitates the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community. The school use on this parcel has existed for some time and the proposed expansion follows directly the purpose of both the zoning ordinance and R-1 Zoning District. Please explain how the project conforms to the genera( guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Ptan. The. planned expansion of Glenvar High School correlates directly to the growth initiatives planned for the area, also accommodating the percent of growth anticipated. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~e existing parcel that contains Glenvar High School and its associrited amenities are contained within a 93.6 acre site. The existing building area on-site covers approximately 85,000 square feet with the approximate 27,000 square foot addition, total building coverage will be at 2.6± acres. The building is situated in the southern portion of the property. This location is an area that will have minimal, if any, impact on surrounding properties. Water and sewer facilities eacist on-site and access is on existing public roads. .. / / i ,r ~ ~ ~/ ~. ` r ~ i' / ~ / / i i _ / _ _ :~ I r ' l / / / ~ ~ / j .f ~ t / / ~ ~~` I i i" /i , ' l l i / / ' ~ ~ -~- - ! ~ r r I I ! 1 {~ f •'IRECC~znv 1 / l ' _ ~ c 3~ \ ~'•_ //~/~~ / ~ ~ j r I ; ; ' I I i 111 ~ I / / ' ~ \ "~• % '~~ ~ ~~ / r L P t -'rte' ~/ Al% r Y Z~ 1 ~ % /% i ~ l~ ~ r f r ;f rI j I-_~ ~ i ' j , ii. •~ '~ j~/i ~~/ j ' i%/~" ~ a~ s~-~ 2vfi~c• /u;l //, ' : A rr ~~ ~ , ~~ ~~ ~~ _~~~`-j ~I' J~ ~ ~ ~,,',~•~ a;.e •Y ! a„n: aJS low c ~_ : / ~l. D.S. ~ .ty~ ~" J~ ~•_ `\ ''/,. ~' ~~•~ -~ ~- '~L wc. r2T.r1~ p~etroscn~ / ~ j~ __ ~ `\~\ \ ~ _ ~ I-• . ~I'J / ~ ' ,`..y r :.•1 .t (iue ~/N/ /Fpfli~~ •c ~ I ~ \ l~ 1~ r....~ l-' ~. •' W 1Cr`l!Y/AN4 /•LiMI 1 I ~ ~ f.~ I i{ ~ ~ ~fj.1. 21{.6 •` ~F 1 B ENO n~50C:sTES ,~C ~ - ~~~ PROPOSED lMPRDY~ME~!?5 G L F11 ~ VA R Ff l Cl~ SCHOOL GL E'J~tYAR Y/RGIIYI~ . _ ko 6C~L~ .~ ~~ ~h o~ ^^Z `~c W KJ~p~~ : _ ~,. ~ ,,;tr , ~ ~n~~ ~ `^ ~~ r•~ X~ ~ ! •~ I ~,_ ~~~~~~= _ ~~` ~•~@ ~~'~ - j--- -' --~ ~: ; ~'--- ~-~ • o- E k~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~~ -~( ~ ~ ~~ ~. .~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ • Y `"~ ~ j y~i ~~ ~a: , ROAH02CE COUNTY ' UTILITY DEPA.RTMSNT ADPLICATION FOR Tr+'ATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date March 24, 1995 Name of Applicant Roanoke County School Board Phone 562-3700 Address of Applicant 5937 Cove Road, N.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24019-2497 Name of Developer Roanoke County School Board Phone 562-3700 • Address of Developer_5937 Cove Road, N.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24019-2497 Name of Design EngineerBalzer & Associates, Inc. Phone 772-9580 Address of Design Engineer 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Nave of Contact Person. Jack F1linwood Name of Proposed Development Glenvar High School Addition Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) _42,000 (two-story) addition - 27,0001 footprint Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MA? AND PLPNIMETRIC Iv't,~3ER) Size of proposed development in acres: ~ 93.6 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 1227.00 feet MSL. Maximum 1233.00 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? xxx No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. ~--'-~ . (ovEa) C. ; `SJgnatuze of pplicant -~~I~~~~ 1 r ' i l ~ \\ \\ } .\ ~ _ l 1``` \ ~ ~~\ \ ~ \ ~ 3 ~ ~, \ y ' ~ ~; i" / ~ \ // r / :/ ~ j , , __ •~y a•~ 1.Y ~ ~ ~ - ~ •~~~r~ ,~ ! 22 2 - I 6- ~' .18 ~. - i ~ J -- ~ - 1 .:~ ~ ~ / 12 2 ~~ l r ~ ~ •; O lL ~~ I ~ \~ I 0 I , \~ 9 ~ % ~ ~.~ ,~ / i ~, . `_ ,t ,~~ ~ ~ ~ / i •~ \ a ,` f ~ \ ~ ~ , f~. •~ _ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~~\ ~- \ ~\ ~ ~ ~. i ~.i '' ~ , ~ ', ~ \ , ~ i .i ,\ \ ~ d ~• _© ~ O ~~ . a O •\ ~ ~ GLEyV4R E4ST " . ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ \ ~2 35 GPM ~- ~ $ ,• _ + 6G / 3• -T" ~ . -. ,. ~ / I ~ ', _ `- . ~ _ , tc1 L pRtu }~ `~ g , .~ 1 i r ;.~ ;. ~ s J^; 4~'~ ~ ` ~ -fit 3 0 \ ~ ~ :, _.- l ' ~ ` ~~. a {{ ~' ~ _ '~~ \~ _ _ 5~ 4 rot ! I t Y ~ ` -' \, 3 ~ ~ i ~ . - -~r~ . - ~ J _ i I \ ~ .. l ~ i - ~- - ~ ~ ~' .; ~ G I ~ ~ ,• i i ~~ ~'~' q1 ' r~ ` . ~ to u by 'd O a . _ uor .~~ .. _, ~a~ i • . - w OOYY • .I ' Il t u . ~ ~. tlOr arr •~ - ~' c t ~; -_ ~ ` t ~ t A ~ - .. .mo - .C: -awa L - w u `1 - a W =~ - -- ~ .. - . 1 ~ • ~ . - ~ ... .vr ~..•~. _ M'Y .. / Y - 'aanr , ~~ tl •IS1 .,~ y rw : >a ~ m ~~ •~r O ~r ~..\~ " ~ ~ t ~ `tom^lt:~~~ . a~ ?t ~s• a•a rn~ sr ~blr r '~ sti ~ • r ~ Zar t ' . t ~ '!~! ~ri !o y~ y M :t:• ' 1 _ ' 'c ~` _ ta ''R r •.~~ „~i b. tw'•.~ ~ •..~ / id to ~ ` _ w. r a '~ .rM A 171 '. • ~ a s v~ .•/ l itt~• a .4 u • - - '~, ~~ ' . . ~.- - ~ ~ W O '~ ~Y O -Y In.IM r \ ~ \111Y If ;01 `. / aa.. ,~ `a a.nra ~ aura t L 1•~aa ' tar. . a U \ amr - ~ '.mr qas ~~ o „ •. ~1 tsar a ~.~ ~ 1 s o tmr •• • ~ ri~ •- ~....a e„ -. - - •: - 2 ~```1 / ~ ~ '~ ~• ~ ~ -' s ,. .•~ / / . ~ . ., SCHOOL BOARD - GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~~ ~ AND ZONING ~ TAX MAP ~{ 54.02-4-1., -2, -3 1 ~• ' ~~ ••~~ ~ 11 I p '• ~• rN 1100 -~ .~ ~(' a! ~ 1'.•00' ~ t-J ~ ~ ," ~ ~• ,,. Im.. .~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 240'18 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only -*' date r c 'v d: ceived by application fe /} (/ PC/BZA date• placards is ue : BOS date: Case Number: Chime k type of application filed (check all that apply): L"J REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE . Applicant's name: JERRY W. MULLINS Phone: (703) 375-2 Address: 7 0 31 SOUTHERLAND CIR . SALEM, VA Zip Code: 2 41 5 3 Owner's. name: SAME Phone: Address: Zip Code: Location of property: The 3400 Block Tax Map Number: 55.03 - 1- 2 approx. 2000ft. west of Salem Magisterial District: CG f4..-6~. Limit on U.S. 460, described as Lot 2 on MAP 55.03 (Block 1 Community Planning Area: G/envuQ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-1 1 .9 acres Existing Land Use: VACANT LOT sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: I ~ ~ 2 For Stahl Uss Only Proposed Land Use: Office/Sales/Very light manufacturing Uss Type: and storage warehouse. Does the p el meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the re sled district? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requeste~Use Type? YES NO_ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. • If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application completel Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. na v Consultation Application Justification /hereby certify that / am em ectiny with the know Owner's Signature: tvs v roe v 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners the owner of the property or the owner's event or contract puichasei and d consent of the owner. 5~' i40 ~~ For Scat/ Use Only: Case Number Applicant Mr. Jerry W. Mullins The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. See Attached Sheet Labeled Exhibit "A" Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Since this property already lies in the PrimeIndustrial Land Use area, it is not a Transitional Area, is bordered on three sides by C-1, and the south border is an intense Industrial Park, we feel that our request conforms very well with the Land Use Comprehens- ive Plan. Our true. intent is only to allow us to legally perform a very low intensity indoor shop work. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The net effect of this rezoning will not impact the surrounding area, adjacent properties, or the property itself in anyway that would be different from the building structure we could build under the C-1 current zoning. We are willing to offer a proffer condition that no work-in-progress material, scrap, or product storage would be visible from the road frontage of U.S. 460. ~- 3 EXHIBIT "A" This property currently has no structure on it. Our intention for rezoning would not change the visual appearance of the structure we would build under cur- rent C-1 zoning. Our building is 1,600 sq/ft Office and 3,200 sq/ft Warehouse.(See sketch). No hazards or negative impact would be introduced that would not be introduced with any type of C-1 development. Our delima comes from the need to occasionally modify in some physical way the standard products that we sell from the manufacturers we represent. We are not intending to be a manufacturing facility. Only occasional light shop work. Since this property has only about 1.4 acres of usable area we can assure the community that no runaway indust- rial development is possible. In fact, future development is intended to take advantage of road frontage office/sales type commercial development. Our structure will~be set back as far as possible from the road frontage. We see this request and subsequent development as a needed addition to that part of the county. We feel that we meet all of the intentions of Section 30.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. .~ `, t .-._.. . `\, r ~ / J ,,, 1. '~' ;i i ~~ :~ t . ~~`- L~/~..'' 'i~ w j i y ~, ~ ~•y y t ~i , ~ ,~ ~ b ~ r~ '~Ij 4 ~ 1; ,Opyr ~e 5 ~ " • o ~ ~ •~ ~i ~ ~ ~ / / o • ~ ~ .e ~ Lit// ~ /'~Cy~/ ` ,~/ ao/T1/ ~ ~'~ '+' ~ t ~ ~~ •~i ~ • ~. / •/ !dam ~~~ ~ K,/ / ~• ` , a / ~ ~ f ~~~ / o s• ~ \ ~ ~~`~ C r/~~ ~ ~, ~, ' ~ ?~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~ • ~ ~~_ /~~ ~ 'c ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ • .4,_ i 9~ ~~ ~ '~~ ~ -`i ,,` J!. ..~ ~ ~- ??~ ,~ r• i 2 V W 1 M ~ ~ O ~ v ~Ex v ,A ~ ~ 0 ~' L~ Q O ~ V~~G \ ~~~ N ~n~ . ~~ P~~v ' \ ` \\ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~„ p C~ o ~ v ` \ 4/ 0 ~ ~1~,\ \ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , J a ~ v ~ ~ - . ...~ . ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~ 7 c, ~':.;~ ~ ~/ ` Coy _a O ~ - 2 ~ ~ ~ r vd Q p ~ ~ ~ ~~.~ N o ~~ o - ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ N ~~„ o. 4 t ~ t v o ro i \ ~~e N ~ N \- _ ~ v m ~ \ ~ ~ ~ .~ J V \ .1 U y..~ N N v ~ •r-I ~ \y ~ +~ ro rn w cn N ro ro ~ J ~~~ ~ ~~ Q., N ro ro •~ ~ O,[v~ ~•1•~o - Z ~ ro ri ~ N W O f"') ~ Ql N rl N ~O O .. ~„ N ~ ro .C •ri - N N ~ ~ O ,~,, U N U U2 ~ N N •~ y~ G ro~ N O~ N O U O W O E C U~~ N U N O O E •,.{ •r-I U Cr •~ b m o a~ o a~ ~ ~+ ro a~ a a~ r, Ec~+~•~o3x+~ o+~ ro rom os~~ Z Aw aC~~-+ ~~ ~, I`rHE~ SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS $~HOWN ... ON THE FEMA FLOOD BOUNDARY 'MAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS SA5ED ON THE FLOOD BOUNDARY MAP AND HA3 NOT ,BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. N ~I a` Q~ 4 _ ~ g 0 a U.S. RTE I I 8~ 4Ca0 80' RAW FIST N 80° 5~' Sa- E ,.. 2~Z.5o' W w LL w a w !~ ~0.- ~ ~; o Ja N .r J ~ ~ ~ h' ~ ~ °~' ~~~~ALTIf* p ~'~` ~~+ t o ~~ ~~RJ~TMOND C. MrEEI(~Z c~ __ r+ Cert. Na v iil Li ~s~ 514 , ~'0 3' TO P I. p -,) SHAWIJEE pRIVE-' w 1.89 ~ ACRE ,~ D.B. SZ9 , PG Z~l "1 • d ~ . ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~ N ~ OLp J FRM. SHED ,4a.2q, e 44, 4a~ Y`1 t; v-t PIV S4 TRACT ~~'~ FORT ot.D p111 Qi OQ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ •~ ~•°`o o ~~ ~~0 5~ °Pt~ ~ ~ o ~ 5 I~ i u ~' I o 10 r cJ ~ ~ Q W 4- ~ 0 J ~ ~ 06 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~~~ oQ3~n a3~~ !~ LL ~ 0 ~ S r ~_ LEWI°, 1 U~USTRIAL PARK PB.9, PG.202 uOw oR FoR-~nER~Y PROPERTY OF SALEM READY MIX COf.ICRETE , 11.10: TAX ~ 5g.02.-2-13' ROAHOlCE COUNTY UTILITY DEPI~RTMBNT APPLICATSON FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE ~^' TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date March 24. 1995 Name of Applicant Jerry W. Mullins phone 375 2640 Address of Applicant 7031 Southerland Circle, Salem, VA 24153 Name of Developer SAME Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer SAME Phone Address of -Design Engineer Name of Contact Person SAME Name of Proposed Development NONE at this time Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Office (1600sq/ft) and adjoining warehouse (3200sq/ft) Future development may involve up to 8,000 sq/ft of office/sales/ warehouse space. Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLANIMETRIC N[T'vIDER) Vacant property .directly across from corner of McDaniel ST. and U.S. 460 just west of Salem City Limits. (Map 55.03, Block 1, ParEe~ 2) Size of proposed development in acres: 1 ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 09,2 feet MSL. Maximum /09.x" feet MSL Is this i application for a development that will be a p~rf or y Yes ~c ~~~E~ sect on of a larger future development? No if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) Signat r of Applicant .. \\ ~ ~SiT-2P~+Lr-rs.>.:.,_,s>~ :-'ma'r _,~..~ `-:~ ~ - ,. ` i ~~- - ~ l`Z~ - ~ -~ ~ t \, `,~ ~ ~ •1 \ \ ti `,~~ , ~~ ~`1 ~ ~ .. Y ; \\ \ .._ i~ `i ~ {/ ~/ 1 ~ t ~ ., .~y . ~~ . ' ~ ~~~t 1 ~ ~r \ \ y x ' ~,• ~ \ , '~ t ""'F 0 j ~, ~ ~` } ~ ~+E \ -. ~ ~ `` ,, ; l,. . , - . . .~ ~= ~ . . ~. .,_, _ .. o L~• 1S •'~ -~ ., •\ :'• ~ \" ` :.,~ " • ~ \ Oat ~ ~ .d ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ . -- ~ ~ i cTD Q D pt9 ~' - ~ ~ ,.~ D W cJ ~s _.~ ~1~ 1.s.\ ~r+ °` ~ % N ~~ Q~~ ~D r _ p.~' - N cfl~ A ~ • ~ ,~ '' _ ~ ' \ , ' _ } ` ~ L di -.~ _ __ `- d ~~ QQ _ Np p p p -s 1~ ~ N :~_ ~ _ L - _ .. `~ w. '" O: - ~_- - w .1 ~ 4 ~' ~, N ~ jam/ - - ~ ~ ~_ - ~~ ,_ ~ _ i -:/ ~ i _ ~. .. ,~-- tom'' ~ _ _ ,` \ l .~, cn = ~ ~- ~ ~ o -' - cn ,e. ` , N 4 W ~ , ' ~,~ ~ OR' 1 ~ r j` •:,.0• ~ SNPwNE6 O b `1 ~~~ ~ O , ~ a ~ 3 n N ~ I O~ ~ ~ {~~ ... _- 4 0 ~~, }\ O 4 O ~ 40 m ~ -3 NORTN ~- i IZ~a a \ ,. ~ 4 • 1 139Ac Y . ~• •` :may ' ~~ x• ~= \ ~'=' w r• ;•• ~` `ew~4~ ~ •7, B C ! , f~~ ~a -aC %• ~•JYyr \ I sz % , JMf \ n ` •«r • j. t ,...mss R.v..•. Ce..ry 3 ;r/ e \ '~~ ~ ~ .a '~~~ 4 ~ \ w ~ t3 ~•• /1.04Ac 38 4.92 Ac s w ~( ~!: .•J!~ ` D !!11 „~ 1.4SAc i~ tw.n lw..••. ,:w ~ ~ 3:1 _ Moses' I.L• ~ d 7 1• "\•• wr y....~ JI10 Jl/t © ~ z _ \ 't'•, r u. !,~C ,~; ;A+ •1~akt.. ~ {..~ ~ ~... ~ ~ c 9 8JIS2 L 21At lCl r'i+'~ \•~•' •• ~' .'~ 514 0: s• I , ~ .".utr w x m~ ~a~ 6 3 3, ..., ~" ~ _,-'' Gam! s 10.1 „••.. 2.18 Ac Jllo s %,460 ~ I -r~-~ .123 Ac • ~ a LOAC n \ f pt\\ O ,~ .+•~" JIli X13.1 ,~ (t7 10 Z i. ~ ~ ~ - -"' JI 1 , 3 LOAe 7 ~ IN• S x~ + ~ \ ~ ,rM •~" :y 9 '' !0 T ° ) ~13 `~ X12 11 ~ 3 II L ' ~~ /~~ ~ S.91Aj~ ~ 2.86Ac R s ~.,. 4.7JAc Jy i s !~ C/ • 2T ~ _ .~ ~ 2.OOAc ° % JJIO 8 ' a 3.06Ac /~ L1 + 3.48 Ac ~" ~~ T.94Ac ;~ :: 24 25 2.63Ac 8.94AC (Dl i ' 5.20Ac ((;L ~ i i i ~ i ~ Jf1/ ~ ~ 2 / ~99 Ac 1 .~ 10.97 At / ....wE~O •~ * DEPARThIENT OF PLANNIATG JERRY W o MU L L I N S :.' < • AND ZONING TAX MAP # 55.3-1-2 ;? ,,, COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SAY P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date received• n received by: applicatio ee: / //1 PC/BZA d •~ ,c~ f I placards i s e~ i BOS date: Case tuber: ~ ~~ ~/~~,. Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE VARIANCE Applicant's name: JIM WALTER HOMES., INC. Address: 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia Phone: 703-389-7264 Zip Code:24153 Owner's name: F. EARL FRITH Address: 5249 Clearbrook Ln Roanoke, Va. Phone:703-774-5263 Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: 88 , 03 ..1.1 Corner of U. S. Rt. 220&Va. Sec. Rte. 674 Magisterial District: ve Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): 2.86 acres _124.800 sq.ft. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Village Existing Land Use: None Proposed Zoning: No change Proposed Land Use: Construction material storage (warehouse) ........................... for Srafi° use only Use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES _ x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO_ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application ~. Metes and bounds description ~:>~~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. J s-~ Owner's Signature: e For Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and ~~ justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This proposas is generally consistant with the surrounding development and provides goods and services that are in support of the rural emphasis carried within the agricultural village zoning classification. Besides, the warehouse/office area in question is but a small part of the overall activity of the site. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Again, this special use request pertaining to the warehouse/office is strictly for the support of our business, which is building single family homes. Our primary customers are in rural country. As this area directly supports the overall activity of building homes, it directly supports the sense of community identity that comes from continued rural growth and expansion. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. There will be no impact. ~ .' ROAH0ICE COUNTY DTILITY DEPARTHBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO ~~ PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 3-23-95 Name of Applicant__ JIM WALTER HO`iES, INC. phone703-389-7264 Address of Applicant 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 Name of Developer JIM WALTER HOME S, INC. phone 703-389-7264 Address of Developer 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 Name of Design Engineer JIM WALTER HOME, INC. Phone, Address of Design Engineer 1500 North Dale Mabry, Tampa Florida 33607 Name of Contact Person GREG HARDMAN Name of Proposed Development JIM WALTER HOMES MODEL PARK Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be .specific) Model home sales nark with administration office/warehouse storage of construction materials. Total of five (5) model homes and one(1) office/warehouse building Location of proposed development .(FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLPNIMETRIC NL~i~BER): Corner of U. S. Route 220 and Va. Sec. Rte. 674 Size of proposed development in acres: ~ 2.86• Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum +1120 feet MSL. Maximum +1150 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? X No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (ovE~) Signature of Applican t• L '` ~~ ~yI v~=: ~ ~`l ` 1 ~ 1 l ~z \ ` ~ ~ 1 ~ ~1 ~o `` RoanoV 1 , \ ~ Roanoke Counl Ci ~ \ ~ Blue Ridge Parkw ~ ~ ~ \~ ~ ~ L~ -~. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ d ~ _ \ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ` 27 ~ !4]Ac ~ \ ~ : ~\i \ 25 a I oo aT a \ \ ~ ~ 23 a ~ , IB ~ 7• A 21 e 29 v • ] 19 . , \ o 4.98 Ac •20 ) 1 \ C74 AG 7 / t. •5 as 101 2 \ S ab Ae ifJ (\ ` ~•, i 32 ~i 1.12 AC 31 . 3 hl k \ I .. 3 • i O ~ . 6.1 ••4 ~ 1 ~ s \ ' • ale s< 3a 1 c 8 a m xu a g \ ~ 1.99 A< ~ ' 35 _ . ~~ --~ ~-RI.679 ~ ,.. , \ 6 •• \ 22~• .,. ~ \ ~.. - ~ 20 3• 21 _ / I.OO AC •S• 4 IB = = 19 '3 ~ r 17 •• - \ 2 \ ~L~a y \ a • \ I.I z B6 ac I \ I.OOAc 1 ,~ P ~ 220 r~l ~ PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION MAP I H}i( ONTH ~EGE ND ~ M --- r.N000 CONTINUATION ~ CIICYIAT[D Ac[uae v)Alel 96D ROANOKE COUN7~ IRGINIA eouNT. [~N[ To+r [.Ic --•-- uo.v [.ocN No ~ D[cD Auuoc [NSION It.5 At01 [[51]1 3! ~_ 97.02 9e,O196.02 aN CrTT •INC ~•••- CLOAL lOT M0. T )CAl[D DIY Ir ).)) ]C.aIC T T - ~ANCCI M0. OCa l1 YIT lIM[ -~- )1 0[/0 DIY[NSION NAT[ LOC. ~0]ITIOF NO • YAK OATC . - 7MC[T INO[] 1••[DO YA CIST[NIAI DI]T. GIN[-"~ YNA eIOCN M0. O[ I COO 1-a00-345-7334 ~ SCALE IN 1/10 OF AN INCH r } ~ 0~ Q (V In APPROVED I tOM~ul~Blo AGENT- ROA`10 E COU).1TY DATE Pl_Ai~.l).11t14 COMA'11SSlOT.j ~~ ti 1 2>~ ti ~2° / z9r c>• ~ V I al m ~. o" \~Il m ~ I in I m ' p~ ~, Sia AG. 3 `~ TRACT 2 o I 0 O I m Q I z ~r O O O O N41° 10'00"E-- 255.00' EE+,~c~~ 1-gT. F'R. OFFICE I.00 AC:. I TRACT 1 N Q N 29c' x o~ 2z I i ~~~~' t S ' 5.`l2 AG. TRACT 3 51T E >~\o•~ ~ \ 5 C~.4° 23' Oo' E -rs.~o' 552°00'00' E °15.47' 5 43°40' oo' E ~iS. 54' `~Cu.5 ~• T. P/.~PARKE~QR ~ /•~ ~~ ~ /'~ ~VE~Fatc./ Y 2Q 0 C!'RTIFICATE No. ~ ~ °t 420 -w° ~P'f~ LAND °J~a S~~ 304• /p. ~- 2' PROPERTY OF HOWARD. L. ST. C~.AIR MOTE= Ti-1i5 PLAT l5 NOT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT BA9 ED oAl A ACTUAL FiE<_[~ NITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE 100 SURVEY AA1D IS SUBJECT TO YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS SHOHIt IUFURMATIOi.I WHICH MAY O:? THE PENH PL000 BOUNDARY / 8E D15GLO5£D BK A FIELD NAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS $UfZVE~( t TITLE REPORT. RASED ON THE FLOOD BOUNDARY NAP AND HAS NOT BEEN YERIPIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATION3. PLAT FROM RECORDS MADE FOR F. EARL FRITH OF TRACT i ~ TRACT 2, ~ TRACT 3~ SITUATE OAI U.S. ROUTE 220 ~ VA. SEG. RT E.. (oT4 2Sj ru o /~ N O l9 O n ~w U j O ,~ w~ a ~ ~ O , J O ~ ~7a1~ cU Q J CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL. DlST. ROAPlOKE COUNTY YIRGINIA SCALE: t'. 100' N.B. CALL. ~~ BY: T. P. PARKER & SON DATE: PE6. 28 188 ~O DRAWN D~A•P• cK'D. P.~rl. ENGINEERS d. SURVEYORS ,LTD. BAIEM VIRGINIA W.O. 8~-DI~O.~-- D- 30202 -E-4 SEC . R2 4 3 ~O > 4 34 >. ~ 0 5 3 0 0 .~ 1° R z ~~ ~ am.rlt.n Alwprlnl of Colum0l. ~ ~~ NORTH r 22 '•• R 117x101 '~ S'zi 229x 29 o i!a°! •. 19 «lac •Yef Uli:ttl .i~~ 23 '~22 4.99 At ~ f~0 = !os ~ :e3•^er 1;~ F19.1 ''~ 4ISk ~srb 167 se •'„ S=sr / - ` \ Gvc.+ ~ _ .'~ . ~ ~S arli lr.o 12 19.2 :.•..~. ~ 29 ~ ~ ~. ~Sl~ 2T • r/: 101 e< Y 1 !r!r g,r3x ~! ` ~ -• O ~r • ~ 1.17 sz ,Y7r 1 ` p.77x '31 ~ c ~ ! ~ loose ~ 28 • c 30 srs •' IAOU ~ II S St1v :..." ~ 9 1 23 re !?~ I03 3c % 1 it ` 104 b 71 ac , 31 / •s:f+ \ !3 xK7 9 ., 36 ~ •'4 n '~ ~ e 34 ` .. sou • •3a a, ~ 391 ~~~' I.eom aloo !os srf: L99 Ae ~ i3jX 41. ~ LSO AC IT ` ~ 6 \ ,' 33 , ~ a~ s •~ ~ \ / frf. 33~ 2 ~+8 s • • : ` IM 100 rt . ,, !~ 7.06 ac ) ~ afi~ 3- 6 23,0 cc w • ' a2 •_~. • sass ~ ~~"' •. ~. ~ 2.35 Ac FJV • - ~\ r ~ ` \ 4~1 a~ e ~ • a3 „ ~ 7 YK ea .417 • LIS Ae IYi AC ~ =~ - ` ~. 192 Ac ~ 2.11 AC TTTT"'TTTT \ 2 ; 7 TT ~ ` ` L42 AC I B6 rc.Cl 3 / 1.17Ae ` AGdS er.e+ c.. .ste.eoq \ \ S!H l92At ~t j f'••• ` ( 1 3 76 TS I.OOAe I ~~ n y arr. . ~°ir cewry .unao/ eo~a o~ tls yt p~~ \`• ~\ ~ V \ ~~q ~,o. poere•• Cawry as , a - 17.1 s.com ml 75.1 °'-; 1 I ~ ` ~ 2 ~ t22 Ac q 6.95 AC C1 ~ , ~~ 7.03AC ~f~ 78 d ~ • ? :~ ~' ~ 11 3.91.e 4`6 76211 ~\ 74 \ .s. O / 34 •!~ :OC..c~r~~ 1.46a 9 RC.B.S. i •+, J LSOAdDi y +• r~ • 1.9Ae -t ~ ~ ~ j 112 ACC`. ~+•' '• ~ '~ l767 ~ 9~ 1 L:~9.c 2 :° 129Ae S ~ :\ •7 •~ ~ ., 44 ~ T2 ~ c.~.... .r. ysf--~ '~~ ., X44 r.'••~ q : S 2~ •s4 78. ••'LiJ RCBS, /~v 3'":4 ° 9 .:\ -LC2 ac ml ~ .'• Y M leO< / a>'i~: \ p a, lSotc Cl , . r 7'0:1 {+~ ~ r~-.. •! ti I 6 ~ 7l Q1 s' •JlJS / \ •z^ i~''i~"~ :• T"- •04O ' 17TAC T&3 • r Z v 0 °° '+ ~ 12 O r 1.17AC 'y 4 2.r8:c hl0 ~~ ` ~~'U~ 13 \ 39:. ,. I arse '.. ~ 129AC ~, 'S Q r ~ s•'.SJ ~ i ~ 69.1 ~ 6 4!r ~ _ ! 1.74 A ,~~ .~2 1w. a. r. 7f~ IOSAe1D, ~~" \ 14 r...... •.. 91k1C1 • -f ~4~4 a . s..' •~.' ~. 6. w • .NOS 8 / 9 \ / . .p `. 67 /• 4.49 AClCI ~~ / ..._ -. li•~ \:~;, ~;\, ,,. JIM WALTER HOMES INC. * DEPARTMENT' OF PLANNIA'G TAX # 88+03-1-1+1 _. ~~ <_ AND ZONING ~• COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 % Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date rec 'ved~: ~~ received by: appfi pti n~~: ~ ~ ~~ PCiBZA ate / _S piacards.is ued: BOS date: ~/ 5, /j?G~.y Case Number: /~ ~~~ ~~~" ~~P~• ~"~ ~' Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VAR~IANCE Applicant's name: Address: Akfer Corporation Phone: 8 9 0- 3 6 0 3 c/o Julian Ferguson 41 72 Toddsbury Dr - Vinto n ~ZiP Code: 241 79 Owner's name: Don F. Gross (Property Optioned to Akfer CorpQhone: fG ~,3~Z.12 Address: Route 5, Box 82 Covington Virginia Zip Code: 24426 Location of property: At the end of Toddsbur Driv Tax Map Number: 51.0 3 -1 -1 & 51.0 3 -1 - 2 y e and adjacent to Lots 22 & 23 Magisterial District: Vinton Magisterial Dist. Falling Creek Estates • n Laurel Road Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AG 3 -~R 4 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Woodland sq.ft. : :~ - .•• • • ' Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use R Argricultural/Residential District For Staff Use Only Single Family Dwelling, detached userype: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YE5 x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES Variance of Section(s) NO X of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable Justification .. Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~Ij~o, _ _ „~, ~-~' • _ ,,,, . ~' ~'" •• For S[aff Use On/v: Case Number Applicant ~ Akfer Corporation The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE A lease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County .:omprehensive Plan. The project as proposed does not conform to the general guidelines and policies. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE A The property is wooded and located on a sheltered bowl-shaped area on the side of Stewart Knob. The Development will be a continuation of Falling Creek Estates and Toddsbury Drive located to the Southwest which facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmon- ious community. The Tract contains 69 acres more or less by deed and is to be divided into approximately 47 lots for an average area of 1.0 to 1.5 acres per lot, depending upon true area by survey, thus preserving a rural feel for the neighborhood. The adjoining property as well as the subject property itself is relatively steep thus precluding any reasonable use as farm land and eliminating the natural conflict which seems to be a part of a residential\farm land mix. Location of the property provides for easy access to Route 24, a four lane highway. Existing water lines in Falling Creek Estates will be extended into the new Development with a new storage tank which will afford better fire protection for the new residents as well as some residents which are located below this project who are currently on a pump\pressure type system. The property is located well above any flood plains. This development will-provide for such needed housing in this area of Roanoke County and will provide for adequate light, air, conven- ience of access, and safety from fire, flood and other dangers. ~5 SCHEDULE B The property will be changed from woodland to a low density resi- dential neighborhood. The appearance of the property will change very little as viewed from the Blue Ridge Parkway located approximately one mile to the West. No development will take. place on or near the ridgelines which would conflict with them visually. The property located immediately to the Southwest is Falling Creek Estates. The property which will be section 8 of Falling Creek Estates will be lower density than previous sections of Falling Creek Estates. The property to the North is woodland• and lies across a ridge from the project. The property to the East is woodland and is owned by the City of Roanoke Water Company. The Falling Creek reservoir is located on this particular tract, however, is across a ridge from this project. The properties to the Southeast, mostly wooded, are large residential tracts and with the exception of property owned by Edward Hale is across Laural Glenn Road (a private road). The properties located to the Southwest and down hill from the project are large acreage wooded tracts. Each proposed lot will be serviced with public water and individual sewage disposal systems. The new public water system will correct the low pressure problems that some homes in Falling Creek Estates have and will provide for fire protection for some existing homes. The property is located 1.6 miles from Route 24 which provides easy access to schools, parks, jobs and emergency services. %~! - -~ .~ _ \ /600 N ir. ~.M `~ ~~ 1 _ // / ~/' \ ~TESt /. ALL ADJO/N/Mfi IROIERT/ES ARE IONED AB-3 EXCF/T SECTION S. FALL/AG CREPR ESTATE) t. eROwc corER coNS/srs ru/NCr ~ OIF FOREST. SGILf: / • - I00 a~rE: ruRav II. /mss CONCEPT PLAN FOR -T Cj' SECT/ON 8 ~r~~ FALL /IVG CREEK ESTATES D£YEL OPER: AKFE/P CORPOR.4T/ON ~I J ~ ~~ > \~ ....~ ~ ~ )~}~~% ~~~ X TOWN OF VINTON ~-,~ S P. O. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE (703) 983-0648 GREGORY B. SECRIST, P.E. FAX (703) 983-0627 ASSISTANT TOWN MANAGER/ ENGINEER March 23, 1995 Mr. Julian Ferguson 4172 Toddsbury Lane Vinton, VA 24179 RE: Falling Creek Water System Expansion Dear Mr. Ferguson: As per your request, I am writing a letter to confirm an agreement between the Town of Vinton and yourself to connect to the Falling Creek water system providing water supply for approximately 48 new residential dwellings near the existing end of Toddsbury Lane in Roanoke County. . This agreement is of course conditional upon you providing an engineering analysis and design of the water system and confirming. that any new supply demand will not exceed the safe supply capacity of the system. The final design of the water distribution system must be reviewed and approved by the Town, meet our specifications, and be acceptable by the Virginia Department of Health. I hope that this suffices in showing good faith from the Town of Vinton to work with you in providing water services to your proposed development. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, ~. Gregory B. Secrist, P.E. Assistant Town Manager/ Engineer cc: Clay Goodman, Town Manager Cecil Stacy, Public Works Director r uec, .um tr .o.. •. i o:t•~o• .., ,~ ~ ~. '~ C.a ~ ~• , ~~ I , t v~~ c •~--. > v ._ ~~ ~ ROANOKc COUN ~ - .~uz 7- se'~~~~. P ~00 v t l C ~> .ei. rw.,,. _.. e.cw~c. ~ " ~Q ~ 3 •.no~L fy VICINITY MAP F ' 2_'< SF+•ar./•-. -_-`COUNTY i x~C3 0 . ~ i ..~~ .i ~~ ~./ ~=_~: ~ T~•. ~'Vt(j ~~ °~ ~ o l 'L~'y ~! / ~~~y. ,3 •.. ~~ n 7a~1M J ~ ~~,ra 4 ~I ~-s NORTH .r.... ~~ ~~ ~ / o~ / ~~ ~~ ~~~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ~C CL~ ~" For staff use only date rey ived: ~ received by: .1/ application fee: PCiBZA date• Q~ placards issued: BOS date: ~ ~Z~i ~+ Case Number: f Ch ck type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ~ VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~ZDaMOk>/ Co~trn~-~ ~YloUnrli-Zq (~mmi5~je'-~L Phone: Address: l Zip Code: Owner's name: ~t'y• ~oSe~ S. O}~Gnbhgin Phone: Address: L oZ 3 Sohr~ ~-G~1al,~ ~h ~00.a Zip Code: ~~10 ~i~ lei rq Irilcz, Location of property: Tax Map Number: 3~5. -(p - j - $ Magisterial District: Igo ll ins Community Planning Area: ~G-~~T'S CZ-CG~G Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C -oZ . o~ acres Existing Land Use: ~-nGt~~ ~Ct.m-~~ {Z~-~t~n~e sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: ~,"( For Stall Use Only Proposed Land Use: ~Jinc~~~ 'Fpyy~~~N ~~~CJ~~N.G.tt/ Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES / NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES _,~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO _~ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application >~:,;. Metes and bounds description ~ ~~ Proffers, if applicable Justifications Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: --,- ~. MARCH 23, 1995 Marshall M. Harris MR. JONATHAN W. HARTLEY, A.I.C.P. COUNTY OF ROANOKE P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0798 DEAR JON: RE: TAX MAP PARCEL # 38.16-1-8 z=~ -- PER OUR CONVERSATIONS, I WRITE ON BEHALF OF THE OBENSHAIN FAMILY TO REQUEST THAT THE SUBJECT PARCEL BE REZONID FROM C-2 TO R-1. THIS 1.23 ACRE PARCEL, IN THE NAME OF ROSELAND S. OBENSHAIN, IS THE HOME OF MR.& MRS. OBENSHAIN AND HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS. DUE TO THE DETERIORATING HEALTH OF MRS. OBENSHAIN, IT IS THE FAMILY'S DESIRE TO SELL THIS PROPERTY TO PHIL OBENSHAIN, WHO IS THE SON OF THE OWNER, AND USE THE PROCEIDS FOR HER CARE. PHIL OBENSHAIN HAS OBTAINED FINANCING FOR THIS PURCHASE; HOWEVEE2, THE LENDER WILL NOT MAKE THE IRAN UNLESS THE ZONING IS RETURNFI) TO PERMIT SIlVGI~-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. THE PARCEL IN QUESTION WAS REZONED IN DECEMBER 1992, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1993, AS PART OF THE NEW COiJNTY-WIDE ZONING ADOPTION AND THE RECLASSIFICATION OF SEVERAL NEARBY PARCELS. HAD THE OWNERS BEEN AWARE OF ITS INCLUSION IN THE REZONING PROCESS AT THAT TIME, THE PARCEL MOST LILLY WOULD HAVE BEEN EXEMPTID FROM REZONING FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. THE OBE~ISHAINS HEREBY REQUEST A REZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO R-1 'It0 PERMIT ODN'I'INUED SINGLE-FAMILY USE OF THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH ITS I~C)NG-TIME USE AND FYJ'I'tJRE INTIIVZ'- IONS. MMH/mmh ANGL/N EAL Y 816 FRANKLIN ROAD, S. W. P.O. BOX 1482 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ,24007 (703) 344-6744 r, l R-3 i ~, // ~, .-- ~ i ~ I ~1%% . l ~- ~~ ~.~.. ,~ a C ~Ty or RoA~ol<r ,y ' DEPAR2'MENT OF PI•ANNIArG AND ZONING ~.. , RC PLAN. COMM. (ROSELAND OBENSHAIN) TAX # 38.16-1-8 p ~=~ NORTH ,,,~~ ~ ~ ~~ Item No . ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing conveyance of easements to Appalachian Power Company and Bell Atlantic extending along Benois Road and across a surplus well lot. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: G~-~ru~~t~~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: VDOT is expanding the right of way on Benois Road in the Cave Spring District. In order to do so existing easements for APCO and C & P Telephone utilities must be relocated. One of the affected properties is on the surplus list of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Tax map no 87311-3-28. BACKGROUND: The Wheeler well lot 87.11-3-28 was abandoned and declared surplus. The widening of Benois Road will not affect the sale of the lot. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The offer to move the easement has been reviewed by Planning & Zoning and the utility of the well lot is not thought to be impacted. All costs and expenses in the relocation will be paid by VDOT, APCO and C & P. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements and Admin to sign contracts. 2. Deny the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance conveying utility easements following a second reading on May 9, 1995. Respectfully submitted: Approved: ~1 ~,~ Elmer C. Hodge ~ County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ~- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENTS TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND BELL ATLANTIC EXTENDING ALONG BENOIS ROAD AND ACROSS A SURPLUS WELL LOT OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) and Bell Atlantic have requested easements for the relocation of existing public utility easements across property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Benois Road, and known as the Wheeler well lot; and, WHEREAS, APCO and Bell Atlantic require these easements as a result of a road widening project of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements will serve the interests of the public and are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company and Bell Atlantic for the provision of public utility S- services. 3. That donation of an easement for utility line(s) along Benois Road and the property known as Wheeler well lot is subject to the following conditions: (a) All costs and expenses of this relocation shall be paid by VDOT, APCO and Bell Atlantic; (b) VDOT, APCO and Bell Atlantic agree to restore and repair any damage to the County' s property which may be caused by the construction, operation, or maintenance of said easement. (c) The existing APCO and Bell Atlantic utility easements are hereby abandoned and hereby reconveyed to the County. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. g:\attorney\board\u6lrelo.ord 2 S "~ ~ \x Y. O. C. StU.. IIr t Du. Uv nrc. wr I I I ~.~=~.' t.P P.T.. Sta. 10+00 Rte. 633 ~, Q Sur. ~ (,°~ ~\~' ~~c,~' ~~~ A-85'00'00"Lt Sr I '' ~ o~ \'~'a~'~`°n AYE ~ T- 238.645 ` ~d9' . 1p.Q~ '~ Pa ~'h~ pjJ~ L-386.36' ~o~,~~sl ~ ~• :::, caa0 (~Q~pg'OQ` \\k PC260+32,0'9 ~,5 e SGrJ`G Off. Rev. ~ \ ~~ P.I.-16+70.73 lyre Gonst. ~ • ,~ PRG' 18118.45 p-80.19 OCn Lt ~ ~ / D-17.07D61' St~'~~OZ Q\Q~ T-1.b~.18' ~~ ~ ~ * 525 aG~ e L•470.4L~ J ;~ ~'~ 9~,~R MOJ~D. `~Q~Q ~~ ~ P.G~ID57855 E'~\ ~~ \5 ~ ~ P.1.16 + 60.7 . , ® ~0 ,~P~ • THOMAS RUSSRLL CD.,INC. do P.R.G.18+4~T.97 ,'~ ® Sao Q8 474 PG.375 \ 9~0< V• ~5 M.P.H. ~ ~ '•, •' x~\R,, 6.39 Ac. ~C\~ ~ a \ ~ LS= 80 ~' ~°' u ~~$. k1°~; ~~ `Q~ ° pp~~~~ . ~~ \ Gay ~uQ`Qo \ •~ ~oY•• '' Goy •0~~0 Qi ~ ~`'~ ~'1 \ F'Q,` .• cA ,Ep ~~ ~ ~ Gf•P ~~ T L.A• ~~tiS ~ ~ i ION ~ ~~ ••' ~ ~®®\ -- 3Zy~ ~' Z9~ ~ ~~~ , ' 9.pe'~ ion it 5 ~ ~ •.~, `~\ /~j~`s ' `'9J '~ J,~('~~j~j `~' / '~\9, (~H; N~ O '•\ : to s. l~H' ~ ~ -' ER OPYIC T--- O 5Ao1 ; ~ ~. ' C1 ~ ~, x • 0 fa ao e L Oulu ~s .... ~----- •+•: •. J~ J , ~•~' h '. •G ~. ILL ~, , G.A~ ~~ .:~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ -(0 [3~ ~ ,.r R.R. 9 ~ o ~IS~: _ - ` j ~~' ova `a~ ° Q ~~\ ~ ~: • • •~ a T ~. • I 6 • q9 u ti Q'I~• 1 `' PQ~• ~` N 003 ~ ~ h ~ ~ r~,• c~ a ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~`~\,z~ A ® , ~ M THE STORAGE BINS INC:~yJJ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z b D. B. 1381 PG. l ,,4 ~. ~ / , ~ .` ~ ~ a t~'~ ~ d- o V ~ • I.P. L \~r ~ a~ ~ J J H S °• ¢ ~ GO ~ ~ Item No. y '" p~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance declaring a portion of parcel of real estate (Public Service Center) identified as Tax Map No. 36.033-1 consisting of .06 acre located off Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81 to be surplus and accepting/rejecting offer for sale of same. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ~ S COMMENTS : ~..~ ~~~-.-~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Virginia Department of Transportation is acquiring additional right of way for the expansion of I-81 in Roanoke County. One of the parcels of land needed for this expansion is owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: The Kessler Mill facility is adjacent to I-81. A .06 acre portion of this property is needed by VDOT to expand the right of way on I-81. This .06 acres is outside of the existing fence and will not affect operations at Kessler Mill. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,000 offer by VDOT-equates to $17,000 per acre-all costs and expenses paid by VDOT. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Department of Highways is acquiring land necessary to expand I-81 in Roanoke County. One of these parcels is owned by Roanoke County at the Kessler Mill facility and is .06 acres in area. This land is outside of the existing fence at Kessler Mill and is not part of any expansion plans. The Engineering and Economic Development Departments were advised of this purchase offer and have no difficulties with the sale of this property. Sale of the .06 acres will not affect present or known future operations or programs. All expenses connected with the sale of this parcel would be paid by VDOT. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the VDOT offer 2. Decline the VDOT offer 3. Re-negotiate the purchase amount ~-a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff reccomends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to convey a .06 acre parcel to the Virginia Department Of Transportation following a second reading on May 9, 1995. Respectfully submitted: Approved: ~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PORTION OF A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE (PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER) IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 36.03-1-1 CONSISTING OF .06 ACRE LOCATED OFF KESSLER MILL ROAD AND INTERSTATE 81 TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses, namely, the expansion of Interstate 81, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1995, concerning the disposition of a portion of the parcel of real estate, known as the Public Service Center, consisting of .06 acre, and identified on the Roanoke County Land Records as a portion of Tax Map No. 36.03-1-1 located at Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81 in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 3. That an offer for said property having been received, the offer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation to purchase this property for the sum of One Thousand Twenty ($1,020.00) Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. 4. That the purchase price for the property shall be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital improvements fund. .~- r~, 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. realest\vdotsale.ord _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~•/ A~ I # j VIR(",IN~ , . _ pKE. ~' l.w ~Y ~ ~ p. 8.1209 PG. 240 ' ° uNj + w \ 3603-I-I ~ ° w ~ + ~_ ~ y~~~~ti~ F ~ b ~ e~' •10 •60 ~ rn \+ FN ~ W SgNiT VAL N BASELINE AU ~ CF~ ~`` ~,~ gys~y \•\ 21)7.45.00 P.C~ ~ a a` ' ~ p ~oe~sz ~~'''~ `' `./0 ~ 100' 0 -~ O~ ~FlFCT Foi ~ ~ o ~ ~Y,yol~~ ~ ~ 7N1 MON # ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~```~ RAC ~ ~~ S FRO ~ . R 16~ e o r\, PROP, ~ ~ PROP -m \+. N~~CF ~ AE-Cp? `,'661 '' ~~ 7N `* STp'~E-W/,!-y '~0 & LAUNE ~ o~E' os ~'~o ?` ~oz _ ~ ~ '' I J~J~-'LJ - - - - . • 07 90NS7.D.GR-8 ~'Q'D, \ ~ ~ ~ ~ $J$ '93.50 TOP~TA/~90~ ER MANNr1LE ~ \'7\lT -1~ -- - -- - _ i '/ `~- - - / i'-c._'~- t~J ~ , ~ / A~ ~~, ~"64.14 R 7W N SBL Con~s1 C -, _ ~` - -`~ ~ - - - '- ~-1~ ~ ~2 GR-FOA-2 ~.._ ,.. ( I I I ~ ~`" ~ ~ I ~ I I N I ~ ` N u' li I ~ 1 0 ~ \ I ~~ I . I I ~~ ~ I 1 q~ I ~ I N"m I M I ~ o ~o I _ I o o" I CO I ~„? I b~~ I b~~l I "'-- _ _ = _ -,~ r ___ --- ~~ ASPHALT _ ORNE I 11~ I N ~~I I ° '~ I I ~~_v m> I I -- ~-- ~ E ll ~E _ _ _ _bL ~~ _ _ _ _-_ _-_ __ ~ _ _ ._ _ _ - - - - - =4-'ff--~ - _. - - - - - - - -T---~--C""e-'T--4--Z - I - - - - - - - '~ED Slrq~ R ~RDRNL TERApNAL ST'G.GR-8 REO'D. R- 2 T!.NS EC_STONE_ _ _~ _ ~~ +.~ 7 REO'D. - ".1 - ----- --~------- ON NBL Consy,CL / _ _ _ _ _ _ { / O ~~ ~ i ~ /~ ~' T - - - ~.r~~^ - - - ` ~ o SAN NbLE6~ - ~,F - ~ ~ ~ -------- EX/ST R/ - ~ ~ j ~ ~ b ~OP = (08806 1 INV. 1079.53 ~ f * * ~ , W - - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ __ . .---~ ~ ~ w LCOYp '09 & c~4u~, R'v",wONQ p• y~ N~HEE ~ =o PROP. Qw ~ 8.727 pG 528CHEF ~ ~ ~ & LA iJNE 6-7-8 PROP. FENCE AC.= 0.85 STD.FE-WbW2 ITARY '.;EWER MANHO 63 ,g OSAN 108!•.4 118' 1l8' ~~ • 1079!0 •41 •4l 62.5' BR17GE N0.1603 _~ ~ ~23 rD.l H-~~ 2 - -- ---ter- -- 1 N Cau ~ I I (~ "' I I ""' ~~ ALUA7101 ~ B 6 ~ V ~ E ~~-_ ~o I old X80 - ~ 1 ~I I 1 ~ ~ ~ WATER METER I ~ I 1 I ti VAULT GMH & ~ I I 'E REGULArQR n, I Y I ~ i _` ~V~ ~~ NBL EP W" I ~ Ij = 7 18' 43" Lt. I --- ~~-- -' __-_ T =186.10 rior~ •I -'-0/RT RO---- ------__ ----_ ___ L • 371.707' ~ ~L- __ Ap __,------ ---- _ 2912.661' ~ •03] ~I NBL Cunst.CL ~~l y7$Lgg,444 w~ ( i 1' ~ ~ ~ D 200' 00' ~ Pi 582 d 51 ` ~ = J 745, 146'1 •1 1~ T 1104.918' ~ o I ~ L • 21o92r `, ~, a ~~ 0 =i rt~ R 286479' ~ , ~ ~ ` ~ "~ PC 570.96.3/ ~ ~ K' n, P/ 582.0/28 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY ~''~ ~ ~PT 592.0 VALUATION CENTEFLINE ~~ ~ C7 ,,, SEE VAL MAP V-10•VA/45 ~ ~. o 4°°; ~ .LSJ. I ~ 5'~ m ~r i < B • 0.0646 VALUATION ~~ ~ ` l85' ' Or w1ll-y rl~ ~ 200.7<:OOBpTL7NE ~~ ~ Q [~~ ~' V - 7 AIPH ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Prgq. Povemenl W/deMr~q ,~ 0 ,1 ~~ Item No. ~'"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Furman V. Wiseman, Jr. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ~ S COMMENTS : ~(l-tee;, ~d'~``~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A dwelling located on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Spring Hollow Reservoir is being vacated by present tenants as of April 30. Past practice has been to lease the property on order to help maintain the house and 10 acres surrounding it. A legal ad was placed in the Roanoke Times and World News giving public notice of the availability of the house for rental. Eight calls or applications were received and a list compiled in the order that they were taken. Both the general public and Roanoke County Employees responded to the advertisement. The first applicant, a County Employee, has agreed to the same terms as the previous lessors, and to increase annual rent to $425.00 per month. The references of this applicant have been contacted and his employment confirmed. FISCAL IMPACT: Rental payments will be paid into the Water Fund of the Utilities Department. No impact on the General Fund balance is anticipated. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A rental property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was advertised as available for occupancy. A suitable tenant from applicants has been selected and has agreed to lease terms upon Board approval. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the proposed lease 2. Deny the proposed lease 3. Direct Alternative uses for the property STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to lease 10.40 acres to Furman V. Wiseman, following a second reading on May 9, 1995. :, ~d Respectfully submitted: Motion by: •~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Approved: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ,.. ~r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF 10.40 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE TO EURMAN V. WISEMAN, JR. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the hereinabove-described real estate was held on April 25, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on May 9, 1995; and 2. This property consists of approximately 10.40 acres of real estate with improvements identified as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 73.00-1-6; and 3. That it is in the County's best interest to lease this property to Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr., in order to safeguard the valuable improvements thereon and to receive fair market value lease payments until such time as it may be necessary to utilize said property in connection with the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project. This lease is subject to the provisions of Section 15.1- 260 and Section 15.1-261.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. rn ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 25, 1995, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for March 14, 1995; March 28, 1995; March 29, 1995; and April 4, 1995. 2. Request for adoption of Resolution providing Notice of Intent to Abandon Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane) . 3. Donation of a 20-foot water line easement from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford to serve Heather Park Subdivision. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with development of Country Kitchen on Plantation Road by Plantation Development, L.C. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. tr~ 1 ' ~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 RESOLUTION 42595-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 25, 1995, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for March 14, 1995; March 28, 1995; March 29, 1995; and April 4, 1995. 2. Request for adoption of Resolution providing Notice of Intent to Abandon Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane) . 3. Donation of a 20-foot water line easement from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford to serve Heather Park Subdivision. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with development of Country Kitchen on Plantation Road by Plantation Development, L.C. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None i. , . A COPY TESTE: C.. Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility a (1'1-1 March 14, 1995 165 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Da~ive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 14, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 1995. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend David Elks, { March 14, 1995 167 R-31495-1 Chairman Minnix announced that he would present the resolution to Ms. Moles at a reception being held tonight in her honor. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 31495-1 OF CONGRATIILATIONS TO MARGARET S. MOLES IIPON BEING SELECTED VIRGINIAS NATIONAL DISTINGIIISHED PRINCIPAL WHEREAS, Margaret S. Moles, principal of Oak Grove Elementary School in Roanoke County, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal by the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals on March 7, 1995, in Williamsburg, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles was nominated by her school and Parent Teachers Association and was judged on interpersonal skills, resource management skills, and human resource development; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles has shown effective leadership and community involvement by being principal of and maintaining the high standards of a nationally recognized Blue Ribbon School, pioneering the School Renewal Project for the Southern Association of Colleges & Schools, and helping establish and t ,_, --- March 14, 1995 169 Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction in the 1995-2001 plan, The plan is updated annually. The list will be presented at a Pre-allocation hearing on March 22. Roanoke County's budgeted projects on the Six-Year Improvement Program are: (1) Route I- 81; (2) Route 221-Brambleton Avenue; (3) Route 115; (4) Route 11- Williamson Road; (5) Support for proposed Interstate 73; (6) Route 220 South; (7) Route 311-Catawba Valley Drive and (8) Access Road to Explore Park. Mr. Covey also presented a list of projects not currently on the plan that are in need of road improvements. They are: (1) Continuation of improvements toRoute 115-Plantation Road; (2) Additional portions of Route 11- Williamson Road; (3) Route 11/460-West Main Street. Mr. Covey requested that the Board adopt the recommended list. Following discussion, Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 31495-2 ADOPTING PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE PROJECTS FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of c ~~ March 14, 1995 171 include improvements to the existing bridge structure over Carvins Creek and the realignment of Florist Road to Route 11. 5. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) - continuation of the four laning of Route 11 to the existing four lane section of Route 647 (Dow Hollow Road). 6. Route 220 South (Franklin l~bad) - We are also pleased that money has been allocated to prepare a feasibility study to improve the existing corridor from Roanoke to Martinsville. 7. Interstate 73 - Roanoke County would like to express our support for this project through the Roanoke Valley. We ask that funds be allocated to continue the study. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 2. Request from the Sheriff for Authorization to Transfer Funds into the Inmate Medical Copayment Program. (Sheriff Gerald Bolt) A-31495-3 Sheriff Holt reported that the Department of Corrections now refuses to provide medical, dental and eye care for inmates housed in local jails, and that the Roanoke County- Salem Jail has experienced an increase from $5,000 to $60,000 per s March 14, 1995 173 need to extend a minimum 12-inch water line at an estimated cost of $18,750. The portion of this line in excess of 300 feet would be subject to possible credits from his proposed off-site facility fee of $6,554. The line extension is part of the future north transmission line that will extend along Loch Haven Road This line will be a 16-inch line. Mr. Roberson recommended that the County participate in the project by paying the difference in cost for the 16-inch water line and additional length with the total owner cost of $14,054 and County cost of $32,000. Supervisor Johnson advised he would abstain because one of his real estate agents is participating in the sale of the property. Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the participation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 22 of the Roanoke County Code to Provide for Monthly Billing of Aater and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions IIpon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of March 14, 1995 175 NAYS: None 2. Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations and 12-52, Parking on Streets and HicLhways Generally to Authorize the Enforcement o~ Zoning Violations Involving the IInlawful Parking of Vehicles by the Issuance of Parking Tickets for Such Violations. Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) Mr. Obenshain reported that the zoning ordinance _:_ prohibits the overnight parking of trucks or commercial vehicles ~. that have more than two rear wheels in AR and Residential districts. The penalties are enforced by the Zoning Administrator who notifies the property owner in writing and gives them up to 15 days to correct, followed by a second written notice. Staff is recommending that the ordinance be amended to permit the Police Department to issue tickets for these violations with a penalty of $15.00 which is consistent with other parking offenses. Board members expressed concerns with several aspects of the proposed ordinance including whether a warning could be issued prior to ticketing and that the ordinance only be enforced on public roadways not on private property. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the first reading with _ March 14, 1995 177 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, authorized the execution of an agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for' the use of surplus County real state located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue on May 11, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium has requested an extension of this agreement for the use of this property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of an ordinance extending this use of County property was held on February 28, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on March 14, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That it is in the County's best interests to extend the agreement for the use of this property located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue by the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for an additional fifteen (15) month period to August 31, 1996 upon the same terms and conditions to assist the Consortium in the administration of a grant to provide employment counseling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to :._... execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke _•_ . :~_ Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - February 14, 1995, February 28, 1995. 2. Resolution of Congratulations•to Judge Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., Upon His Appo~'htment to the State Supreme Court. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Plantation Grove Subdivision. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards, Section 8. 5. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Roanoke Valley Therapeutic Riding Program. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 31495-6.a OF CONGRATULATIONS TO JUDGE LAWRENCE L. ROONTZ, JR. UPON HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT WHEREAS, the Honorable Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr. has served as a member of the judiciary in the Roanoke Valley since 1967, when he was appointed to the Salem Juvenile and Domestic l~~iarch 14, 1995 179 March 14, 1995 181 Supervisor Johnson: (1) He expressed concern regarding the Freedom of Information "FOI" articles in the newspaper and felt that there are certain items that must be discussed in private such as offers for property and settlement of law suits, and that the Board must certify what was discussed in executive sessions . '~~' Supervisor Rohinke: (1) He visited Transkrit and Medeco and thanked Economic Development Specialist Joyce Waugh for her assistance. (2) He attended a luncheon forum for Moorhead Kennedy from the U. S. Foreign Service and thanked David Wymer with the County Schools for setting it up. (3) He expressed appreciation to the Catawba/Mason Cove Rescue Squads for finding the youth who was lost on Dragon Tooth. Supervisor Eddy: (1) He thanked the staff for the new citizen handbook. Ms. Green reported that the handbooks can be picked up from her office. (2) He asked whether the Roanoke County Today show on monthly utility billing should be aired before the proposed ordinance is approved. Ms. Green advised that they will announce that the ordinance is only being considered. (3) He asked Ms. Allen if there has been any response to the County resolution requesting other localities to form an Organ Donor Commission. Mr. Hodge advised that this is being considered at the next Salem City Council meeting. (4) He asked when the Customer Satisfaction Survey will take place. Ms. Green advised that the survey will be conducted around May. (5) March 14, 1995 183 5. Alan Gleiner, 10185 Bottom Creek Road 6. Suzon Bowles, 10357 Ivy Ridge Road 7. Bill Rosolowsky, 8314 Willett Road 8. E1donKarr, 8011 Poor Mountain Road 9. Chris Barlow, 6542 Old Mill Road 10. Diane Rosolowsky, 8314 Willett Lane 2. Gordon Saul on Behalf of the Back Creek Civic League, Speaking on Road ImUrovements to Route 221. Mr. Saul spoke in support of making all the road improvements to Route 221 explaining that a delay would substantially increase the cost of the road improvements. He presented a video showing the increased traffic volume on Route 221 and the dangerous curves in the road. 3. Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation. Mr. Echols reported on the meeting and public hearing opportunities that will be available for citizen comment during the location and design process of the road. 4. Terek Morsie spoke concerning alleged harassment by the police department who are checking licenses on his vehicles. Mr. Morsie advised that he felt he is being harassed ,, because police officers are checking the licenses of vehicles March 14, 1995 185 1. Budget Work Session with School Board The work session began at 5:45 p.m. with all members of the School Board and Board of Supervisors present. The following budgetary issues were discussed: (1) new positions added to the school payroll; (2) proposed increases to teachers salaries and how their salaries ~~'are calculated; (3) employee health care; (4) renovations and maintenance projects at the schools; (5) projected debt for county and schools; (6) proposed new Cave Spring High School and (7) the proposed $10.1 bond referendum. Supervisor Nickens asked for the number of School Board employees who have been added to the payroll. Supervisors Johnson and Eddy asked that staff look at a managed health care program to offer employees another choice. Supervisor Eddy asked the School Board to look at all options for a new high school including the possibility of two smaller schools. IN RE: NEW BIISINESS 1. Request from School Board to Approve a Reimbursement Resolution for Renovations to Cave Spring Junior High school. R-31495-7 Mr. Hodge advised that the School Board wishes to proceed with some building improvements before the $2.5 million literary loan funds are available, and they are are requesting an March 14, 1995 187 financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Project is $2,500,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution amended that reimbursement not exceed $500;000, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 7:25 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session with the School Board pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Disposition of Publicly held property; and 2.1-344 A (3) Discussion on Use of School Board Real Estate located in North County. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None The School Board members left at 8:20 p.m. IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-31495-8 At 8:24 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to -- open session and adopt the certification resolution. The motion March 14, 1995 189 Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT ~~' At 8:25 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Respectfully submitted, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman - . March 28, 1995 ~ (~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virgitx~,i.a 24018 March 28, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 1995. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Chairman Minnix. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. °~ - 1~Tarch 28, 1995 _ 1 93 the County, but it is the County's position that the Department of Social Services and the County have no legal liability in this matter. Supervisor Nickens moved to deny the claim. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy. Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 2. Resolution of SupUort and Opposition to Items to be Considered by the 1995 Veto Session of the General Assembly (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attornev) R-32895-2 Mr. Mahoney reported that at the March 14 meeting, it was. suggested that the Board adopt a resolution advising the Governor and members of the Roanoke Valley legislative delegation on several key legislative issues that may be considered during the April 5 Veto Session. There was considerable discussion about Governor's Allen proposal to reallocate governments. Supervisor Johnson this legislation be added to the and Minnix indicated that they did this proposal to take a position. Supervisor Nickens expre lottery proceeds to local requested that opposition to resolution. Supervisors Eddy not have enough information on ssed concern about legislation NAYS: Supervisor ABSTAIN: Supervisor RESOLIITION TO CERTAIN VETO SESSIi I~iarch 28, 1995 Eddy Minnix 32895-2 OF SIIPPORT AND OPPOSITION ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE 1995 JN OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board wishes to express its interest in matters to be considered at the Veto Sessiorty of the 1995 General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative matters are submitted to the 1995 General Assembly for its favorable consideration during the Veto Session. I A. Law Enforcement. The County urges the General Assembly to maintain the restoration of funding for the H.B. 599 Program (State aid to localities with police departments). During its 1995 session, the General Assembly restored $10 Million of HB 599 funding. Failure to preserve this funding will result in a serious loss for Roanoke County. B. Fringe Benefits for Constitutional Officers. The General Assembly restored funding for constitutional officers' salary fringe benefits (SB 560, which was passed and has been signed by the Governor, increased sheriffs' fees to offset the fringe benefit costs). Preservation of this funding is a top Y priority for Roanoke County in the 1995 session of the General Assembly. Failure to support this funding will result in a loss ,~..._ March 28, 1995 1 (~^~ - to the Clerk's of the House of Delegates and the Senate of the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution with amendments, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ~~ ABSTAIN: Supervisor Minnix 3. Request for Consideration of Proiects from 1995-96 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. (Arnold Covey. Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-32895-3 =-- Mr. Covey reported that the State provides localities ~_, the opportunity to receive state matching funds to improve primary and secondary roads in the state. $10,000,000 is provided in the matching program with localities limited to a $500,000 match. Mr. Covey presented a list of 56 projects which represents one million dollars. Staff also added Camney Lane to the list because rural addition funds are low and the residents have contributed $20,000 toward the improvement which will decrease the County's share of matching funds to $480,000. Following discussion, Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the $480,000 funding and the list of. projects. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None __ _ _ March 28, 1995 199 1. Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Kohinke nominated Carole Brackman to serve the four-year unexpired term of Wayne Dunman. This term will expire September 26, 1995. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-32895-4, R-32895-4.a, R-32895-4.b, R-32895-4.c Supervisor Kohinke moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLIITION 32895-4 APPRODING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF _ SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 28, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Inmate Medical Co-payment Program to the Jail Medical Account. 2. Request for Acceptance of Forest Acre Trail Into _ the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request for Acceptance of Periwinkle Lane Into the March 28, 1995 WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Office has experienced a substantial increase in medical costs for jail inmates, and WHEREAS, they have established an Inmate Medical Co- payment Program to collect a portion of these costs from the inmate based on his or her ability to pay, and WHEREAS, it is estimated that theprogram will collect approximately $3,000 in fees on an annual basis, and WHEREAS, these fees should be appropriated to the Jail Medical Account to help offset the medical costs for jail inmates. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia authorizes that the medical fees ~y„e<y c:_-` collected from jail inmates be appropriated periodically, but not less than annually, to the Jail Medical Account and that this transfer be reflected in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 32895-4.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FOREST ACRE TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS; the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit March 28, 1995 _ ZO3 Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, - are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the- Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5 (A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of a Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, -`:'~= and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddv, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None March 28, 1995 205 IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund IInappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund IInappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund ~~ 4. Proclamations Signed by the Chairman 5. Bond Project Status Report IN RE: RECESS Chairman Minnix declared a five minute recess at 3:55 p.m. IN RE: WORK SESSION AT 4:05 1. Budget Work Session Presented at this work session were the proposed maintenance work programs at a total cost of $1,335,520 which is not funded, the unprioritized Capital Improvement Program which is also not funded except for the utility projects, and proposed contributions to social service, human service and cultural agencies. Supervisor Eddy asked for copies. of letters from organizations requesting contributions. .Supervisor Eddy suggested dropping out of Virginia Municipal League. Supervisors Johnson and Minnix did not agree. .March 28, 1995 Zn7 Ms. Hyatt reported that the items to be included in the $10.1 million VPSA bonds include architectural and engineering studies for Fort Lewis Elementary and new Cave Spring High _ Schools, major renovations to other schools, a Northside gym/auditorium and a south County stadium renovation. The closing procedures for the bond require a pu~lic hearing, and the actual closing is scheduled for April 26. The following citizens spoke in support of funding for the architectural and engineering study for a new Cave Spring High School: 1. Betty B. Hosp, 4551 Fontaine Drive r`" 2. Mike Morris, 4225 Arlington Hills Drive -~ 3. Terri Landford, 5940 Merriman Road 4. Jim McAden, 5771 Grandin Road Extension 5. Melissa Doll, 2701 Hillbrook Drive Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about spending $1.5 million for the architectural and engineering study, and advised that he felt that all options should be studied including the possibility of two smaller high schools. Supervisor Nickens also expressed concern about the costs and the possibility of two stadiums in southwest County. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The vote was as follows: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Minnix "~`'' NAYS: Supervisor Eddy March 28, 1995 209 SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10,100,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale_of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at the price of par, upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement with the VPSA providing for the sale of the. Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1995A"; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning January 15, 1996, (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 (or such other date as the County Administrator may approve) in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the annual interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does -; not exceed eight percent (8%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the -_ aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of March 28, 1995 21 definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2005, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2005, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2005 to July 14, 2006, inclusive ............. 103% July 15, 2006 to July 14, 2007, inclusive ............. 102 July 15, 2007 to July 14, 2008, inclusive ............. 101 July 15, 2008 and thereafter .......................... 100; Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not .less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be set forth in the Bond Sale Agreement. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, .if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. March 28, 1995 The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March 28, 1995, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to dopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy 2. Public Hearing to Elicit Comment on the Following: gent Robertson, Budget Manager) `'~ a. To set the real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. 1. David S. Courey, 3419 Ashmeade Drive suggested that the real estate tax rate be reduced slightly each year until it is decreased to $1.05. 2. W. L. Rossie, 3023 Tamarack Trail also suggested that the real estate tax rate be reduced and offset by user fees. 3. D. C. Minor, 3577 Cedar Lane, expressed concern about the real estate tax rate. b. To_set the personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and to set the machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. March 28, 1995 Totaling 7.93 Acres from EP to AG-3, Located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, IIpon the Petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-32895-6 Mr. Harrington explained that the property was originally purchased in the 1980's for the creation of Explore Park. The Authority has now decided that a few parcels could be sold without jeopardizing the project. The parcels were previously zoned A-1. In 1992, under the new zoning ordinance, the parcels were zoned AG-3, and in June 1993 the parcels were rezoned to Explore Park (EP) district. They are now requesting that the property be rezoned back to AG-3 to permit the sale of the property. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Wayne Campbell, 6635 Corntassel Lane, spoke and reported that Explore Park owed payments to contractors and subcontractors and asked if there was any way to require that proceeds from the sale go towards making the payments. Supervisor Nickens reported that Mr. Campbell should take his complaint to the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority of which he was a member. He assured him that the funds from the sale would be used to pay debts. Supervisor Nickens asked the Board to approve the rezoning for the first parcel (2 acres) and delay action to April March 28, 1995 'Z1 7 1-8) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of EP, Explore Park District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of VA Recreational Facilities Authority. ~~ 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 - A 2.00-acre parcel of real estate located on the west side of Virginia Secondary Route 1029 designated Tax Map No. 71.00-1-8. 7~f-.~.. ^ 1 ~] D ~ in ~- .. v. i- In ^ xu~P'cZ'~~ eglzrizrrzL~-3~~-~61~-iz~c-caz•e ee•~3z~~6~-zzrc e~-~e~-~ea~--~ea~-i~g-~e-~~-Qee-=ate. , n-~i~~~re _-__= s~eu~~reas~e~-y-ee-~~-e-f-~e~i~-oc~>~a€~-gamer c~j=-ate ~e3~e-~36i~~?e35-t=~f~-~-9~ ~i~~@~r~ l kar_ra~j ' decdibe~a;--~~en~--,rrt-~i ee~e~e~~re e~~~e~~al-ems 9-~-i~:~~-fie ^~a r~-e~~es s ; ~e-~-~-~o-~~t~re~tee-wz~~ ate;one-t-~i~e~tg'~-~t=e~--S^~~e~-bo-'ra-~-n•e~i~~aT deg--~~~-~i~~-~8 8 .-~-=e ^~eze e~--~e~s , ~e a-pe~ ; ~e~e~s'--~--v.-i t-~i t-h~~e~-t-e~-e-f t~~a rd-e trt~et-~e~-~ •eas~er ly_ _:: e e~f t-ire--~+~ ewe-Ee~raa=~ p~"'r == }- j' ; ~~e~ee~-rte tie e~~~=tee e£-her-P=eFerty~:. 3•~deg- ~+~er--t•e-~=o~-$-~~e~~-~re~e~~~~e~ee--;~~t-fie 3~re-e~~e~-~~i~-~-nam~e~rd~~ep~~~ #-'z-de~~31--~~ tt y~ .f-J~ .-~Teet-~--~-pa ;~=~=e ce~ccr-6-~ an--~-fez ~a~ ; -~~-..~,, l^~e,~'e`~a-1 e~y. {.ire a ems-ter--e-f--~h-e-~t 1yej-~~-re~a~a~ TS~GT~GTl ~T~+ ~Q~GT2~ T^L. v. T . [+(.i '~~e•~eL'C~ ~. L. .-. F ; r ~A~@ii3~}~f~6~S-eS-Qiz'~ ~TS~tZ-TtceS : $ . $T~•G~~-" n tt~~ ~4-~3~€eet to a~c~-~~-t~e~ree-~.T . 8-~de~-4-4'-" ^ -:.T-~- • , ~'~~'z-feet ~e-a-~e ~-~- a ^ g . 1~-, .~-min- t-~e~ee~+~~l ~~ ~3~9.9-•€~ee~~e a•-~e i ~ *~~e~ee-~~-8~8 deg~~~-S~z _ ~ee~-~9-~~}e-~l~~e--9~-n e~zzzirizi~~iTa--cvzrtz3 3~-1~~--~=tea ^^•~--~ e~-P3~ 3-SJ5~6i~F3~6i1-3-~~p-sircca•e~• • m n n ai~'Ee=- ":' , e e3~-uir~--s~ccz-'a~ey-6i~'S , ~cr~e~-~-4 cece~ cz-i~~~8 ~ f ,~Pa.e.~a.~,~-~•eed---B a e~ , , ' , ~g e~8~~~e-fie ~e~Fe March 28, 1995 'Z ~ (~ _ the now defunct Virginia Asphalt Company. Over $200,000 in industrial improvements have been made to this portion of the property. The Planning Commission recommended approval. There were no citizens present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ORDINANCE 32895-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 22.21-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3862 BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 98.01-2-25, 98.01-2-26, 98.01-2- 27, 98.01-2-28) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR UPON THE APPLICATION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 22.21 acres, as described herein, and located at 3862 Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Number 98.01-1-25, -- 1141arch 28, 1995 _ 7 7 ~ Less and Except the following described 1.88 acre parcel with point references being to the hereinafter described plat: Starting at point 2; thence S. 40 deg. 20' 49" E. 236.02 feet to point A, the Actual Place of Beginning; thence S. 64 deg. 14' O1" E. 110.00 feet to point B; thence S. 44 deg. 56' 31" E. 161.18 feet to point C; thence S. 48 deg. 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to point D; thence S. 62 deg. 38' 50" W. 103.68 feet to point E; thence N. 39 deg. 49' 53" W. 237.30 feet to point F; thence N. 48 deg. 46' 25" E. 276.44 feet to point A; the Actual Place of Beginning and containing 22.21 acres, more or less, as show~i on a plat of survey labeled "Exhibit B" entitled Plat of Cunningham Properties, Inc, showing Property to be Rezoned to AR . . ." prepared by Lumsden and Associates, P.C., dated January 16, 1995. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. An Ordinance to Rezone 1.864 Acres from C-2 Conditional to C-2 to Allow General Retail Sales Located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, Upon the Petition of Everett J. Miles, Sr. (Terry Harrinc7ton, Director of Planning & Zonin March 28, 1995 - ~ ' ~~ -- BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.864 acres (TAR MAP NO. 36.01-2-3) and located at 1806 and 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is hereby changed; from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Everette J. Miles, Sr. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing ==--_-~ the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby removes as follows: -Y - March 28, 1995 Billing of Aater and Sewer Service in the County of Roanoke and to Provide for Conditions IIpon the Placement of Liens on Residential Rental Real Estate. (Paul Grice, Assistant Director of Finance) 0-32895-9 Mr. Grice reported that if the ordinance is adopted, residential utility customers will receive monthly utility bills with one-third receiving an actual bill and two-thirds an estimated bill each month. Mr. Grice explained that penalties will be applied to estimated and actual bills but cutoffs will only be done after the actual meter readings. The delinquent customer would be subject to cutoff within 15 days of the bill that includes the penalty on the actual reading. Included with the Board Report was an illustration of an actual monthly billing. Supervisor Eddy advised that he had submitted suggested changes to the ordinance, but had received no response from the staff. He also suggested that the penalty amount be more consistent with other utilities. There were no citizens present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy R~Iarch 28, i99s ~ 227 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Division 2. County Water System of Article II. Water Systems, Chapter 22 WATER, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: * ~ ~ Sec. 22-82. Rates and fees. (c) Security Deposits. (2) If any utility customer at any time fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in disconnection or discontinuance of service, that customer shall pay an additional deposit as security for future bill payments. This deposit shall be required in addition to full payment of the outstanding utility service bill, including late payment penalties and any applicable charges imposed pursuant to Section 22-82(7), and shall be paid prior to reconnection of service at the same location or initiation of service at any other location in the County of Roanoke. a. Residential. The security deposit for a residential customer of water, water and sewer, and sewer only services, shall be in an amount equal to the customer's last ~•~__ ____~ ~~`~tr'' billing, rounded to the nearest~~Y~Orier~llDo~~Yar~~~~($1.00) . ~'~~ ~ * ~ (3) If any utility customer fails or has failed to keep his account current, resulting in a subsequent disconnection or discontinuance of service at any time, that customer shall pay additional security deposits, as required in subsection (c)(2) above, as follows: a. Residential. In results in a discontinuance o utility customer security deposit customer's last the event that non-payment second disconnection or f service, a residential shall pay an additional in an amount equal to the a March 28, 1995 payment o enalt ~e:s Lltlllty customer Calls to maKe Tull ast due balancer and the aforesaid e~~e f ifteeri (15Y%) days of the 1M.v.:h:.???:-]?!. ~;a W ~i.4 +fF{i. i {*-+n i;--. ..4 Y'ra~M-l~+r~M !{i-- ??Y :;Y:i4~.• n.:...i n, ... ... i.... - f ym ail past due balance., the lat paym n enalt °`°e~ the disconnection"""'fee" "" p ~~~.:;.:;;, , ""'tb'e °'r' connection fee, the deposit"'~'~'(~i.f applicable) , and any other charges or fees shall be made prior to service being restored to the premises or initiated at any other location in the County of Roanoke. (Code 1971, § 20.1-31) Sec. 22-86.2 Lien for Water and Sewer Charges. Taxes or charges hereafter made, imposed or incurred for water or sewers or use thereof in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, shall be a lien on the real estate served by a such waterline or sewer$<w ~~.:ec~~t * * ~ 2. That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective on and from July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. An Ordinance Authorizing a Special IIse Permit to Construct a Regional Stormwater Management Basin March 28, 1995 _ 231 ~' Authority. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 9:24 p.m., Chairman Minnix adjourned the meeting to March 29, 1995, at 12:00 Noon at the Vinton War Memorial for a joint meeting with the Vinton Town Council. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, ~, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman March 29, 1995 233 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Dive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 29, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Vinton War Memorial, Vinton, Virginia, this being a special meeting for the purposes of a joint meeting hosted by the Vinton Town Council. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 12:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice-Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Supervisor Bob L. Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations OTHERS PRESENT: Vinton Mayor Charles R. Hill, Vinton Council Members Joseph L. Bush, Jr., Roger R. Altice, and C. Buford Barton and Vinton Town Manager B. Clayton Goodman, III, Vinton Town Clerk Carolyn Ross, (Councilman William S. Obenchain was absent) -, March 29, 1995 235 proposed downtown revitalization project and asked for ideas. Supervisor Nickens suggested using the study on downtown Roanoke that was developed by Roanoke County approximately six to eight years ago. The County offered assistance from their Planning and Zoning Department after completion of the County's visioning process. 3. Cooperative Programs Mr. Hodge advised that the report on cooperative efforts with Vinton has been completed and provided to both localities. ___ Supervisor Nickens reported the need for additional -=: parking at the Vinton Library and Town Manager Goodman suggested extending the parking lot to the Vinton War Memorial so that both facilities could use the lot. It was the consensus of both localities to continue to meet and Roanoke County will host the next meeting. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 1:12 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote with Supervisors Johnson and Kohinke absent. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, n. vaeli ••ruzzy•• rllnnlx, cnalrman -- April 4, 1995 237 ~._ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Dive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 April 4, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being a scheduled meeting to adopt the tax rates. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairman Kohinke called the meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, and Supervisor Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by --- April 4, 1995 .~9 beginning January 1, 1995, and ending December 31, 1995, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of 1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Eddy, Kohinke NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, Minnix 2. Request for approval of resolution adopting the personal property tax rate and machinery and tools tax rate. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) R-4495-2 Mr. Hodge advised that the requested personal property tax rate for calendar year 1995 is set at $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation and the machinery and tools tax rate for the 1995 calendar year is recommended at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing was held on March 28, 1995. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution setting the personal property tax rate of $3.50 and machinery and tools ~~ tax rate of $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. The motion "'~ carried by the following recorded vote: '` April 4, 1995 _ 241 -~ --- beginning January 1, 1995, and ending December 31, 1995, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50%) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of ~~ Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1995, and ending December 31, 1995, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of 3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Eddy, Kohinke NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens, Minnix 1~1- ~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 RESOLUTION 42595-4.5 PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABANDON SECONDARY ROUTE 1153 (ELMWOOD LANE) WHEREAS, It appears to this Board that Secondary Route 1153, known as Elmwood Lane, from the eastern line of the right-of-way of Norfolk Southern Railway approximately 70.6 feet westerly to a pin set in the northerly line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 at the southwest corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1 and the southeast corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09, more particularly hereinafter described, serves no public necessity and is no longer necessary as a part of the Secondary System of State Highways and should be abandoned pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the code of Virginia of 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the section of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 sought to be abandoned is described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane) at a point on the western right-of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway and the southeast corner of a 0.225-acre lot known as Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1; running thence along the northern line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 north 63° 08" 41" E. to the southeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 on the westerly right-of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway; running thence along the westerly line of the Norfolk Southern Railway property north 23° 08" E. 1 5.86 feet to the point of BEGINNING. NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: u 1. That this resolution shall constitute the intention of this Board to abandon the section of road described. 2. That the Clerk of the Board is directed to post a copy of this resolution, which constitutes notice of the Board's intent to abandon the above-described section of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 , in at least three places on and along the section of road sought to be abandoned for at least thirty (30) days and to cause publication of a copy of this resolution in at least two issues of the Roanoke Times & World-News and to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7'~-~--~ Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner Q~ V 4?9~s ~a 1t~9 f ~~? s9 ~ ~ « 'O 6i /1 r~ 3 I V.VV MV ~O~ \'J E 4s~S ac tD) 4c (C1 / ~~ ~`~ /~ 19 • 6.68 Ac TO BE ABANDONED ~ /O ~ __ !2 QQg ,o~ t - _,. 9 n r 1.2$Ac . _ .~ O ~ y /p~ '~ y . a ~ ~ - ~6 469 j // 9 ~ 1.83 Arc s t ~~s~ ~ ` Rt. ~ X09 s12 --- Barley Drive ~a _~ ROANOKE COUNTY . ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ~ -- - J ACTION # ITEM NUMBER fli'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• Adoption of a Resolution Providing Notice of Intent to Abandon Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane). COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- Hutchinson Limited Liability Company (Coors Distributor), the petitioner, is requesting Board of Supervisors to approve the attached resolution and announce its intent to abandon a portion of Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane). BACKGROUND- Hutchinson Limited Liability Company, the petitioner, has requested the County to pursue the closing of 70.60 feet of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane). The right-of-way being proposed for abandonment is from the terminus of Virginia Route 1153 west, approximately 70.60 feet. The petitioner is requesting the abandonment because they presently own on both sides of the road and would like to fence their property to halt after-hours trespassing and improve security. rn-~ ST]NIIKARY OF INFORMATION: Elmwood Lane is a thirty (30) foot prescriptive easement adopted into the transportation system pursuant to the 1932 Bird Act. According to VDOT, Elmwood Lane (Rt. 1153) previously known as Bohon Road (Rt. 612) was the old alignment of Route 612 (Poor Mountain Road) from Rt. 11/460 across Norfolk & Western Railway to where Barley Drive and Poor Mountain Road presently intersect (refer to attached map). To improve the road alignment and railway crossing, Barley Drive (Rt. 612) was relocated. Section 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia requires Board of Supervisors to provide Notice of Intent to abandon a street that is a part of the secondary system of state highways. Then upon adoption of the attached resolution, Roanoke County staff will post in three places along Elmwood Road a copy of this resolution for thirty (30) days and publish a copy of same resolution in at least two issues of the Roanoke Times and World-News. If no public hearing is requested at the end of the thirty (30) day period, staff will bring back to the Board of Supervisors a resolution for abandonment. If public hearing is requested, the petitioner will be required to publish a notice of time and place in two issues of the newspaper. Once properly advertised, staff will bring this issue to you before a scheduled public hearing. Staff presently knows of no reason why Board of Supervisors should not proceed with the posting of County's intent to abandon 70.60 feet of Elmwood Lane (Rt. 1153). If public hearing is requested, staff will bring forward a resolution at a Board scheduled public hearing once petitioner publishes a notice of time and place in two issues of newspaper. FISCAL IMPACT: None ~T1- o~, ALTERNATIVES• 1. Approve the attached resolution and post notice of intent to abandon a portion of Elmwood Lane (Rt. 1153) pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. Deny attached resolution and not abandon portion of Elmwood Lane (Rt. 1153). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Alternative 1 - Approve the attached resolution and post notice of intent to abandon a portion of Elmwood Lane (Rt. 1153) pursuant to Section 33.1-151, of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. S MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~~~ ~~ Arnold Cov y,~Di ector Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & nspections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens 3 I~-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 RESOLUTION PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABANDON SECONDARY ROUTE 1153 (ELMWOOD LANE) WHEREAS, It appears to this Board that Secondary Route 1153, known as Elmwood Lane, from the eastern line of the right-of-way of Norfolk Southern Railway approximately 70.6 feet westerly to a pin set in the northerly line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 at the southwest corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1 and the southeast corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09, more particularly hereinafter described, serves no public necessity and is no longer necessary as a part of the Secondary System of State Highways and should be abandoned pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the code of Virginia of 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the section of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 sought to be abandoned is described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane) at a point on the western right- of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway and the southeast corner of a 0.225-acre lot known as Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1; running thence along the northern line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 north 63 ° 08 " 41" E. to the southeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 on the westerly right-of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway; running thence along the westerly line of the Norfolk Southern "' Railway property north 23 ° 08' E. 1 5.86 feet to the point of BEGINNING. NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That this resolution shall constitute the intention of this Board to abandon the section of road described. 2. That the Clerk of the Board is directed to post a copy of this resolution, which constitutes notice of the Board's intent to abandon the above-described section of Virginia Secondary Route 1153, in at least three places on and along the section of road sought to be abandoned for at least thirty (30) days and to cause publication of a copy of this resolution in at least two issues of the Roanoke Time & World-News and to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner. i~~ A-42595-4.b ACTION NO. ITEM NO. Ii~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a 20-foot waterline easement from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to serve Heather Park Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,/~~~ ~~~~~wf SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves donation of a 20-foot waterline easement to the Board of Supervisors, from Frank R. and Mary Elizabeth Radford, in connection with the development of Heather Park Subdivision, located on Glen Heather Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke (Tax Map No. 76.07-2-52.01), and as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department dated February 2, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huf a Assistant Coun y Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections •~ METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY ~^ n 4~. e~' ~,~. o`~ ~~~ ~~ NEW 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT N 45'15'40" E 35.00' i~~ 1 0~ 155.55' 2.56'x., ~ i 55 2 ~- S 44'12'33" W -" 180.35' S ,3,0p" 3 w I W ~~ ~ -` 189.14' 3.1z. p 1~ ` I b W I OLD DEED LINE IT ~' -- ~ _~ J'\\ I N Q I EXIST. CROSS ACCESS Z cP cd's I ~ w I & PARKING EXIST 20' 15 52'- ~-3 G G~ z_ z ~ ~ N ~ ~ < Q ~ G+ ~ ~ C ~ N ~ S 65'00'00" E ~ 18.64' J ~ a o I w z I EASEMENT SANITARY SEWER ~ ,~ „ ~ ~p ~ ~; ~ I EASEMENT 7 5' 8.20' ~~ .5'~ w ~~: ~ _°o_ ~ ~ ---N 44'12'33" E _ ti ~'` ' 223.15' ~~'S~ ~ ~ ~- l I I EXIST. 30' CROSS ACCESS I I & PARKING EASEMENT I 35' ~ 20' X10' 129.16' --- N 45'15'47" E 224.94' GLENHEATHER DRIVE, S. W. TAX MAP N0.__76.07=02 =52.01 _ SCALE: _ 1" =50' NEW TWENTY FDOT WATER LINE EASEMENT TO BE CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY FRANK R. do MARY ELIZABETH RADFORD 12.5 ~°'O° o; ~ ti~ O~ O _CO_UN_TY_OF ROANOKE CITY OF ROANOKE PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE:02-02-95 .r ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-42595-4.c rn -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer easements to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in connection with development of Country Kitchen on Plantation Road by Plantation Development, L.C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer purposes in relation to the Country Kitchen Project of Plantation Development, L.C., on Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, from Helen S. Journell and James E. Starr, (Will Book 47, page 1054) (Tax Map Nos. 27.06-4-15 and 27.06-4-16) shown and designated as "NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Shanks Associates, P.C., dated March 29, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. b) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, from Plantation Development, L.C., (Deed Book 1468, page 1826) (Tax Map Nos. 27.06-4-13 and 27.06-4-14) shown and designated as "NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Shanks Associates, P.C., dated March 29, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. That portion of said easement which passes through the existing dwelling located on Tax Parcel 27.06-4-16, as shown on said plat, shall not become effective until the dwelling has been razed. c) Donation of sanitary sewer easements, ten feet (10') in width along Walrond Drive, and twenty feet (20') in width along Plantation Road, from Plantation Development, L.C., (Deed Book 1468, page 1826) (Tax Map No. 27.06-4-6) shown s "1 and designated as "NEW 10' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" and, on the inset, as "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" upon a plat prepared by Shanks Associates, P.C., dated March 16, 1995, a partial copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by County staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these easements. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ ~~ Vickie L. Huffman Assistant County Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections TAX PARCEL 27.06- 4-17 ROBERT L. CARST D.B.97J PG. 207 L-6 -- NEW SANITARY SENE77 EASEMENT /0' ~-I TAX PARCEL 27.06- 4-16 I HELENS JOURNELL .~ Q a ~~ TAKE I JAMES E. STARR ~ Q WILL BOOK 47 PG. f054'~' D 8 279 PG 26B j + '~ . . . l O ~ ~ cs~ EXIST. DMCC. ( TO BE RAZED Q ~I O (SEE NOTE 2J Z ~ ,4• 10' --I Q ~ EASLgIDVT Cl9V7DXAYE L/IE TA6~E - TAX PARCEL 27.06- 4-15 r~ I HELEN S. /OURNELL ~ ~ JAMES E. STARR I l~8 WILL BOOK 47 PC. 1054 D.B.310 PG. 180 L- a v PARCEL ll ~. TAX PARCEL 27.06-4-14 (,EN7EId'JNE Gf` EASEAIfNT NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ~' !0' PARCEL l :, o TAX PARCEL 27.06-4-13 ~ ~ 10' -+I V 20' --~ L-11 TAX PARCEL 2%06-4-6 PARTS OF L0T5 2 ~ J ALL OF LOTS 4,5,10,11 AND 12 WALROND COURT NOTES.• 1. IfAS FLIT WAS PREPARED MIIF/OUT IflE BENEFIT G-~' A RILE REA94T AND 7I/f7d~fta4E' A/AY AOT /ND/C.AIE ALL ENLY/I/BRANQ~S UPON Il#'f'~I°ERTY. ?. OEa'CAAAY A'' IF1AT PAQAON Q~' 1NE SANITARY Si~MER EASEMENT MN/G! PA55E'S 7NRIX/Q~l 1HE E.t7S1INC DNEIL/NG LOu17FD CYV TAX PARC12 ?7.06-4-16, AS SHOMN NER£Q1/, SJYALL NOT ElE'L'~ME £fFECAIf GW7$ SVI/O ONEZL,NC NAS BEFN RAZED. PLAT SHOWING ,SJ'~INKS' ,155i~CL17F.~ P.C. NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ° "~' - Pr.~s ' J7J L(ACA ./1~£IbC/£ TO BE DEDICATED RQIhCi4'E; NRGYAd41 2"!076 TO THE s S a IS r~) .~,c COUNTY OF ROANOKE s~ L E , L11TE.• OJ/29/9 1-=100' HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT cALC.• Roc DRAWN BY ROC ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA CREW.• F.B.: CHECKED BY.• JOB NO.: 495010 L/IE A1~C1KlY LYSTANCF L-6 N 60'11950 E S70 L-6 S 21 0 E 19St916 L-7 S71AJ 0 E 1?~51 L~8 N58UB 2 E lQ18 L-9 S 2! 0 E B5t79 L-!0 S 21 0 E l4QJ6 L-11 S 6978/) W 282 LJIE L1F~CIX.iV LYSTAAI~" L-1 N !B7? W lJQ25 L-? N 1872 W BIVB L-J N 11X6 W Q9/ L-4 N7Y1~6 W 1211 L-5 N 2Y1 ~6 LY1 W 7LlZ IJ ' E%HIBIT B ~~~ ., . ~~~~ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS TO N7T.• \ THAT PLANTATION DEVELOPAfENT, L. C. 1S THE fE'E SIMPLE OWNER OF 1HE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON, SAID PROPERTY HAV'NG ~ ~p ~,o,Qa BEEN ACIW/RED BY A C£RTA1N DEED OF RECORD IN 7NE CLERK S OFFICE OF 7HE C/RCU/T COURT OF ROANOKE CO(iNTY, ~7RClNIA !N DEED / `l~~s~ BOOK 1468, PAGE 1826. ~9~-~~~ 7NE PLA TTINC OR DEDlCA 170/V OF T11E LAND .Sl-IOWN HEREON /S WI IN 71!E wA IFR ~~ wA li R f7?EE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE W1TH TNF DESIRES OF 1H£ UNDERSlCNED FIRE HYDRANT SAL L£ A/F 1FR OWNER AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 15.1-465 i~!ROUGH 15.1-485 CF 1NE LADE ~ OF NRG/N/A, AS AMENDED, AND THE SUBD/VISIO.N GRD/NANCE OF IHE COUNTY ~PI'F) ~~ ~ ~ 1 I OF ROANOKE, NRG/N/A. OO '"t"om""-° BY VIRTUE OF 7HE RECORDATrAN OF TH/~ PCAT, INE !.'NDERSIGN£D CWNERS \ I ~: I HEREBY DEDICATE UNTO THE COUf/TY Of- ROANAKE, NFC~h'IA, ALL OF THE ~ v - g ~ wr/! ' LAND EMBRACED WITHIN 1HE LiM/TS A= 7NE fi£REON MOWN EASEMENTS ~! `^ /+~`~£ ~ I \ Cwc sTnrrr ~ [~, /N WITNESS Wh"EREOF ARE HERE9Y PLACED I}lf FOLLOW;NG SlGNATL'RES ~ ,-aAwE~oi~r.~,~r,, 1 ~' ~,, - t t AND SEALS AN THIS _ DA Y A~ 1995. N $., ~ 3' `~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~;ro~ ~, \ ~. '~ A~'7 NEW LOT 8A =~ \\.- 0.524 AG d..~ FQP PLANTA7IAV OCVLZQ°A/ENT, LG DA If ~~ 4' >,~~\ - "fat 5? til ~• 9 ~ l i~_ S NOTARYS' G~'RIdF7CA1£ ~ O ~ Ya. ~', ~' r1 ~ STA lE' OF NRD'N/A AT L4RG~f ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1"' .~ ~ `~.. 1, _, A A~OTARY PUBUC /N ANO FAY INE '~ C~ ~ `~ AFQ4ESA/D AND S7AIE DO HF74E8Y C1rNP'"/ 711A7 /~~ 1 6,'. Ces' PERSQVALLY APPEARED B£f'AYE Alf /N WY ,.VR157NCTIQY ANTI A(h7/ONL..DCt~ Nf>•' 70' 5Ah'~TARY (~; I / INE SAME ON 799_ SCM£R EASEAlEN; A!Y CGM/A//S9QN E,~°/RES UM NOTARY Pl,OLIC 70. Tc i :.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LO ~. ~^ ~, ,, SEC T/ N 7 ~ ~O h ~ I ~ WALROND~COURT ~ I '' ~f N / z ~ ~ ~ ~ HE'M' 10' SANITARY f EXIST. APCJ EASEMENT ~ S£11EI1 EA.SEaIENT l f ~~ -- S g 767 ~.. IprS~ S ?/t;1T70' E 7,TQ5B' S - -- - ,~ Pt'S~ ,~ N AREA FAR R/GHT-OF-WA Y DEDICA AO/V 6~~ ~o ~° ~ s z wJO ~ ~ 0.022 AO s C) -- Iv(s~ PERA/ANENT DRAINAGE FASEAlCN7 PLANTATION ROAD AS P£,R vDaT PRO,~cI Nrr (VA. SEC. RTE: 115) I75-OBD-JSO, PE- i07 HEREBY vACA if0 INSERT SHOWING EASEA~fuVTS AND R/GHT-OF-WAY ALONG PLANTAl10N ROAD SCALE 1 '=20" STlR4£Ygll'S CERTIf1CAT10N• l HEREBY G~RTIFY 1NAT 7N/S PLAT AND SUBO/NS.' BY NE AT THE .lYREC7I!YJ Q~' 1N£ OMNERS M'~ ' fS ENr1tELY Ml1HRV 7++F BCLWDARYES OF INt LA/~~~ SUBLYNA'JYS / fURAIC7t CDYIIfY INAT ThE :vpv~ IN INE IXERNS OFF7Cf OF THE pRCU/T COURT OF RCLINLYCf CO(ANTY, NRt;YVl,1, INIS PLAT ACTUALLY h441'F BEE)'V PLACED ANU 11~ l1l/S PLAT, M77F1 7}/E OERIA9CAIE Q~ AQKNONLEDGEAIENT 7HERER7 ANNEXED /S ADANTIED AND d/ARAC)EA ARE 1XgRECTLY 9HONlr D,"^. Tn 1Nf BEST OF MY KNONi.£DL7E' ANO QELlEI" ANL: TD RECCRD ON 199_, AT OCZOCX -AL AuA%;i/UM STANDARDS ANU PROt:EDURES AS FSIAb STA7F B~ZARD Q'" A.?~1F.CIS, .ARQ ESSKY.A_ CN: AND LANUSCAPC ARCit~TCCTS 1LSIFE• County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $7,123,594 November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process (40,000) November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct (10,000) January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements (92,000) February 28, 1995 Citizen Survey (12,600) April 11, 1995 Dixie Caverns Cleanup (2,250,000) April 11, 1995 Tour DuPont (5,000) Balance at April 25, 1995 $4,713,994 i• Submitted By ~z~~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 5.5% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,659,037). i• ~- of General Fund Expenditures 8.3% m:finance\common\board\genera1.95 April 13, 1995 ~~~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $ 29,835.86 Submittedy by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance m:\finance\common\board\cap ita1.95 ~"' County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget $90,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill (50,000) August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road (10,000) September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway (1,000) October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan (20,000) January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study (3,000) February 28, 1995 County Code Supplement (4,227) Balance as of April 25, 1995 $1,773 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance m:\finance\common\board\continge.95 a i N In o .- o~ or o e wW cn 1- d < d O e d' C A I ..c C , O~ >' Y of C1 A o; rl: F I O~ T 1 V ll c~ 7 U M N 0 x Ja Ja V L O a 4 C 7 tL ./ • L • C • u O D x lL I o« X O~ a~ m N N w U .+ c ~ N C m 7 p • O C r • K >A m ..~ ~ z c v • C > O • L iL' s rJl v m N a l I~hPOi 1 T.~ / yrv~i IDN71 N 171 1 •1- N .- tl}D M ~ M M • In In •o r •~F7• b N m mmFl O T F ~ I~mM~ MI'10 .-1 lNM11 ~ P bob, boo ~ O o 0 1 b o 0 1 b 1A 171 111m•o1 M ~ ~ b p' q m of • N 1 x L • O ra L' >~ L Vta~ L • • ~ O ~ • * ~ • -I pry ; p.Vi. f. JD WW 6 y d d 1 .-NI O O ~ „aFZar,aelr~,rnatals 1 I I fFll1~ too. 11 lMI71~µ • P•O '1 Jmo+ 7 M M 11 Ja/A.t ;obi •Ifl P•Q 1~ :~~1 faDTC rMN•I 1 7 It M (1 )TOD 7 M ~ Q 10 m a mar oPVr m11.r F N • b T 1 N M f /O o • F F I m N t o N IM F e Fal IN EDJ Ilno¢ •aulw ^~m t N ~ 14 tFa~ 1 • F O In t F t JFED ~[ 7NUIM tmNq J T ~ Q •aan -Y1N~ )N f t O J m U - r- ) o o f O O C ) o o c ~ooe; tbma rmNU IMJ17i 1°~aPDi IM- d M 1! )oo~ ) O O ) 0 0 ) o o renbd t N 1 N Y i . p • x n F Y Y O O sl + • /0 bJ~ N A C 4 :.~ .. /^ +MJA .c • .+ °->u r a o~ ~ d J ~^b N goo -f i ~ iJl l 0 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 e1n1 mIFJI~ a l ix i ^ I H • ~ p . ~t i • k i uA• i N J • i C 1 r N a..: • t ~cu~ ~~muL.i ~ N N I O O < e w r M b +~ I Y 3 YYY b 0 A C Y ti h J V F J V 4 L N Y O C V • i • u ~~ J >~ GC O r~ V ~e~ >< .w ~ ~ r . F ~ rulmw lNN1~ f OOaa rm-vt IJI UI V OD I F N M m ~ V 7 ~ F Y 1 M O ~ • PCDI •-F~ N M 1 0 0 ~ O O 1 0 0 ~ o 1n+ a ~ l N v O O ILL 1 L • • a ~Ri'~ n F 1 • • ,I ~o~ ~ O+1 aNl O O 1 a n a p R P ~~ /~ ,, .. I., I- : ,. J P 7 ~- ~ 7 b o 0 1~l1 N~ F M r N o F! iui•o.~riui•~ui rouiuivnil~-acs JFGD~N7~M M1F7MFa0m OFD ~ ~ j ~^ r In m 1U f UI Q I IJI N N M O• dD N o I±I CD ED I tYm tl•N.- o oU17.-q• oNT7o~ -m/0 a-O•Ih U1oMIJITm ~at~ 101 1Mm ~enm0771~11-Tm MmF ~Ip~ mN~!- yN'-'NM~IYJ~Pa~•atAl ! I I I ~ II r o v N v In I11 N t M o .o o a+ d• f`+~ ~ 7 N M tl• M 7 Q o O .- .- OD 1J1 O F Ifl IJI GD I -Inm ~b 0•.-~~ItttI lflo.~NOR ooNCD NI 1 In ~ b N N f~ v v b IID M .~) /n o :- ~ N J T N N N~ M ~- T M N +- P 7 N m M~ Ir o••- NNMON~ ~ I ~~ ~ N .- 1mFN~?Ut~ OFMdDM NMF )F~~D O•Mb.- mNPt o OmM . I. i.oorival>'.,li ea.l'rlnri di .otti NN+- M :-o171 U1N FPgD lU M ~ ~ ~ j i )ooboobo tiFO1J1MO1%1TR~ )oooaDMbo minolnooufolQ~ )IJI IJI Ih InNiho ~f ooM ~ oF+to~ i. )In/JJY1N1J1I~o I+ImoDUINoWo.-I ulllo•r•f.-w•- aa.oa oo.MN V N~ 1 f d•MNM7NdoF~ ~ ~ ^ ~ '` ~ O I ~ fT T I • V i ~ V rm ~ Ns~ I v-°. d 4 • ~ I < C O O N p N 7E: C. i >~ .•. A• i • Ow ~ N N ^ I L.+ i~' a °ODU~ v ~o~ P • N • •+j~ +• O~ < III O~ ~ ti LL p >> L G L tL' M .+ p A V > ~ L q (. ^ ^ ql fL III M U V U .m tODU -L.It~oL ~ob.~vl 7~ ItIt{. a~pNI 4Li•W~V~ C N I 0 0 ~^ •• M N tlJ « L V I• fJJ •V i u >>r• 1 :.•nt7L i +eo ecS>v~ab>uWwL tvsylC.r r• a^U 0 1 w•~ A • *~/Lf+ • •tt • • OJ: • M CJd4. V dU.tl: CCI71.JK~IC2gJ~0; )•-N~Fa00•o.-p11Do 1-moi~tM~ t.nMMMMMV'7'f PN4r11flmJomFl ) O O~ O b~ 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0~ O b i 1 - o lr In roam D r m ID M I ~NPe~o 1 r.-mTm IIFNIhF 1 . ;. , r OCDmP 7 D O+ N .T. N 111 1 )Nm ~ ~- 1 ~1=v ~ a i ) O N O D .- m 1 D Q m • i i o ~ 0 1 I N ~ .. ~ 1 b N b ~ In t m r > N In n vlloti 1 D ~ m r ~- M 10 1 ii u ~~~ • +• n~< 9 .-• r • 1p ' 11 4. ~ 1 Vv L D w O 1 n < i M 0 C V ~ N .0, U ~ s~`k~ 1 .~c ~ f W O F aNm~M Dlcm a ) 0 0 O : sIv a :, I d r t r a i u r ~ r t M r T I 1 M ' r v' ~ c r ~ u ) J h ) o n 17i ^ F D 10 ) I~, I it i ~ C L [ J I F of 1- c S K ~ ', a a x i ~-"~ ~. o. e: ov ee W w ID f- aa A C p w • Y O SI If: O >^ « C O V 1a C 7M ee J Q e ]O J6 uJ n t=- Y Z O 7S r J 7~ Y N K W J - O E O { 'uul~ c aj w n1 ~I al E C1 e, c i1 ~ • 7 i I~ ~+ V F' CWV~ K ~ W c~ C N J «I m~ « of I T ', ~ I L~ « C = I r I 1 1 0 .o . DD 1 F h o. r o C .- < 7 FUIF 0~ 0+ H! 7 OWN 1 ~I~IIM ~ ~D .~ f 1 air N QIM1 W P ^ f ~ W tb o 1 1 4' Ih M ' • 7 Ifl o ~ M .- ~ l+ C . ~ ~ LL • ' M L ~ • C • f! N _w S O O Y L O a • a D Z LL^ r 1 L I o e N f M f • W J F Fw- Ki W Z u W W I Z O o ' F 5 o dD r: J a+ N ~ f i I i s C f b i +~+ « n ~ w ~ p l~ 0 A ~ p,l?. R.N ?. o. h of 111 + FI h N N c~~ D N + D O f - 111 ~ -- °rd n N d +0 ~ ~~ h N ^ N M ! h W ^ W U ~ M h .~ ~ F 1 CND ~ t 5 7 C Y E 1 r f f 1 Y 1 ~ L 7~ O U e N 0 R A k 1 111 •F. ' IU r M I rN -I 1 F ~ M1 , I 1 M I 1 I ~? I ~~ ; rW I I )N I ~N ~ 1 I 1 ; IM ,N ~ I I 1 ~ I i ' M i M ~ C 1 ~ « I .+ ~ .s u i ti I ~ N is ~o R 8 R J, ~:~ I. .I~ ~ I ~I I ~, I .I. i ' I I ! i i I i i I I ~ I I I l NO~t F IN11 ~ Ob~F~ V' W a•~ o0 . I. j i F T F r o ~o1f1W o ~ N7M117• 0~ FT OO I F i FAO ~ ~o FILE a ~0 ~0 Fo i I i I ! i I i QI I AI^o`111e D o M a0 b I m 0+ 7 N W JD N .0 ~ T D N IbI o• W J o +-mMN~- N MF a h W ~bMW I F Ma~FdOM +- ~WO~M 0 .. DD OAF { F dDMW JDF Ill MM 9 ll1M 111 I t11 M1mnh j N Ufl oM I ~ , I M ~ i a i 0 MFtU W I ~ ~MNba~ b o~oN 0•N V W ~JN ~- N M7 W ~h W 0~ orb a~o• FM I ~. A W ~0 ~00~ ~ O'p o111M f ~0 eo~.-M i o dD' ~ o ai d+ ao m lri r%1 ui r+ J- ui ~ .l:.: o~ ! I FMON M CoN W W N M1-o~of11F~- ^ W ~IbIN~ W MFM~-F M I~1NF I N~ I i qJ N o. Q1 ~ .- i ~ N ~ ~ oIhMT m W lllN U1 Y1 tM f N A TbN Q ~p NIl1OY w W 1 NON ~D OMFI~C M I u ~~r ~ ~NUitiv a I I I ,_ i Y ~ I j i ! I n 0~ U1 M T p. CO to T Y N Y o I ~0 UI O M 7 X04'.• W .- Ym0+0+111 uD V F~ NM D oMO+W I N 4'W W~o< M M I o•W IoW 1 7JDN~- l11 MoNMa J- N N? i Fa• ~ - UIWN ~ 0 4~JN O~AIO ~1- NF l NM I I~ I r ~ '.~ I I l 1 I I I I ~~~ ~ ~ l I ~ I ~ UI b•f? N ~aNNmo 0+ NI~INO~bNN-'. W 0•~-W I W NW-uDF 111 FIh YIOO F'M ~, . D oJD ~OF I - Noeh FI11 0 .O I~'17 W Ifl '-M ~ I h Th~111m T N Woo MAO F MI~1 M~-11`-NT I I 7 W No~o+ I o Ma''-IIIN b MdJ70~N Wes- ~ ~ I J MOF- ~ 7 ~.DW No b~ 1hNo I Mme- ~. ..I - m i N MM N .- I~, .- dD i M ~ i I « ~~ V I I l I U i i ~ i ~ i C ~:, L I , w i M ~ i t! I « I ~. I ~ ro • w •- C .vi n o >. n II c L +. « p q a. A I F M 4 I C ~ F p I +e ~ a j v I ~ I °•~ o 1 V 6 <n ~+ •~+ 4 I „ C M + C CI •+~ .V. A 7 ~ «7 w• J • o N m ~ Z c«~ w u l E +b L > « • M >, u tc ~ u~~. ~ ~~ •L1 f L ~ O fL •i+ C Ol • • DI > • I > ao- « U o C1 C j fJ ~ 2 « C • Ol J W I • A M N« C p L 4' ti ~+ L L A > • LM o b C•~+ of • b « ••+ 3 L L 1- r+ p F C C fl d b 7 U O O C • q C Q • I • >> k O O ~I J~V Q L~LWfl C! ~ L6.W d~+f-M i ~. O OIA I 4N0111O I O 0111 jg~ IflO ' M7 NMM7 N MM 4'If1 M MM ~7Q4•Q Y1 YI U1 Nlll 0 eo boobo 0 0o ee I R W A ~ A% -. A ., 5 a 7 7 7 Y. 7 2~ :Y A% A A p ... I ~ m m N ~- o o o P 0 0 a< \ o. c ~ I _ as ~+ 64 m _ _ £ aaa q ~ \ ~+ M C b a w s >~G Y e O q K S oW1 rc 4 p 1- T ~ _ uou~i W~ e ~~ 4- ~ O .~xY W ~ t b q 'O • • a e 'u C 6 C e • 7 e .~. u CW aw~ x W a C~ C a ~. a~ O .~ j t CI E i 1 1 1 1 I ~1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 F N m M 0 m d ~• N N F ri ~b T II i 1 F Ij N 1 ~1 O . 1 d i I ~I ~ I i I M 1 I N P 1 I ~O I I N I 1 M I 1 1 ~ In 1 9 C 7 n L • C • V • L A I 0 7 M t r n s x N O m o o _ O D L O d IL ~ I .. m =,, . .. .. - .. A. ~ .7 :~ .,.: m f I ~ f I I 1 ~~ I I ! i ' I I i !, I f I ~ ! I I I I I i 1 I I I u I i ~ M i ~ I i ~ I I ~ ~ ~ 0ooboo~o ~ N~ ~ ~ I i I ~ ! ~ I I o~ ~ oN~O T Fd OOp ~oo ~ ao .~ dSNN 1 , 7~t 7F~oo0o0 o .-~b ! IlIF~ 00 pl ~O fU f~ ~ ON~7 b b ! N~ ~ ~ I ~D ~O i ^ O+ ~b ~O o. ! I i 'O N 111 N N l!1 N N I I ' i N ~, ~ M L d IA o i I I I I i o o~ ap o o b m tf1 ~ I~ Ih ~o D ~ o I + F -- MN W ~o M tl+M 4~ .o I .-Ntho 7bdUIMF M 0~ 0 OD F h ! 1 O N Ih vri~ N l d N ~o ~^ ~ bvm O IbMN ~- ~ ao F ~O O O .O ao ~o ~b N ~O ~O r-o+~vi•rlh~v~-ri ri e~ N M W Y N ui F N I a di O ~O I M w o i M N? Y N o , I ~ ~ I p, I j ~ ~ F' a i I L L I +O ~ i b N ~ 7d F ~O ~~gg MF pp F m O ~ F ({! O N E7 o Cp FM .b O. ~W O m O d m F M ~O ~ o N ~' d W ~O N M M IA U1 d CD q m d N ~F~ M 111 OD o ~ OF aD ~ aD aD d ~- ~o aD N N I FF~ CD F N m Ih .-p M ~ ~o M o~ o dl In g In f!1 d o I ~o f N ~ N M M M T .- U1 fli ~O N T i I, 40 ~ A N I N t4 N + ~ I I ~ ~ a °D aD m ~ I ! i c U I n ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 d F N I I N N N N I ~^ ~ ! IA N I i 1 v r M ~O 1 ED IA f- N F ~ .- d ~D ~!- O~ F d N I ~ ~f F I, N Jo m lIl 0~ ~- F i M F F ~ F d o ~ F ~ l0 ap I M M d 1 11 ~ 1~1. d 1!1 1 M F M I IA b~ aD d ~O M , - 7 ~ F F .- .a r h 6 Ill F ~ ~O F ~ dD N If1 F CD aD EO UI o f N ~M d o~ F N ~ tb N N M M o o 1 I ~ 7 ~ d ~ aD ~ OD ~ I M I o N I I ~ ,. booo nN rl mb ~ F I '~ - ~ I I NCO ~- W o ~ ~O in N Iyl d IA 111 N I Fo In F b o P 0 UI N F tl1 O~ UI o b ! 111 o U I F F ~O N ~D O~ d N ~ d ~- IbI o ~o O .o O O .- I b Q N I!1 t ~ ~- ~ I NM MF MAO ~O~ m D Nib N O~Od o M l UI ~ oFOI11d d I CpO~N~D~ Md F 0~ d : 111 YY M to N ~ ~ +~ tl+ o M ~ ~- F ~ .• F I d - ~ D T Y ~ 111 d~ 7 N r d ; o~ I N ~- I l^ ~. ~ i N v l v ~ ~ a o .+ ~ ~ i a a I ~ C q V l e -q r C ; ~ a I j C~ q i ~ I I i I ~ O~ .b L • I q U C i i L o o c o e a ~ o f a ~ ~ ~ v• • ' I i ~ ~ ! I I I • w L ~ ~ • U C N ~ L %+ ' '+ 2 i r H 7 ~ ! o ; r G ~ ~ I I C L •~ tll C • O r L I c U e• • o •~ w e~ V ~~ • w ooc•~ a 1n ~ T U r• U I M L ~" 7 p o F • • ~ C e T ~ M C '+ C a C III r b 6 6 01 i w r O e p rL tr • a ~ r 0 r ++ r q L r {.}+~ x g b C q ~ +~J • LSW.+ U 7 a p L • I t F ' CCCCCC C 11- 'O O I q +~ O • C 'ti I O r I M L • b W • 7 • b a 1~ • m y u C q C u L L. c M c 2 ~ L u c oc x > L •• e a n c jjj777 w •L~..~a TSa ~ F- q IL • C ~w Y q >c d .~ o V m s ~-a • q ub~ ~ > • L• C I T ~ L ~ 1- . I J ~ o-+ ru •n -+.+C~M 4d+L CCC M T L ~ q *+L O q r o 4.^ o o b ~ • V .f+ ~+ q I L P b O T .4 • c ~ c c r b v- ~ ~ O o ~o ~ i F t I o w • q t o F • o aD a.. t c L o• a o o. i -- b i aeL yr a tac Y o .+~.. ..~er•s a • Oi4 +eJ+> r R o F ~ ~ La q++ dJ c.. O y t1 t1 00 O U ~ UW ax x .. i++ q••• O C C I C WO FO:~C V~+•+ ~ ! = 00 b0 ""~L~L " ~~ryOIA ^ bIA 01/161110MI11 ! ~ I 0: M FFI ~UI ~O ~FF ' NN tb a0 c0 ~-~- MMkdIll Yl lfi I ~O O~O~ mo~0~o~o~O~o~ o~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O ~ t9 j I 0 0 O O I O O ~ ~ O O 0 I ~ ~ i _ .. _ _ e r, .. .. A ~. r. s I ,. - - ~ a I s y 1 - - } a .. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER 'T'om 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CONA~NrS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CRAIGIE FERGUSON-ANDREWS NATIONS WHEAT 1ST CERPIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & IRAN CONA~IERICAL PAPER: CRESTAR PAINE-WEBBER SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW FIDERAL CRIDIT: SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT' POOL: GENERAL FUND RESOURCE AUTHORITY REPURCHASE AGREII~]T: CEN'T'RAL FIDELITY FIRST VIRGINIA NATIONS SIGNET D'I'AL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respect lly Submi ted by fred C. Anderson ounty Treasurer ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) 993,012.50 993,058.33 991,901.39 1,982,879.16 4,960,851.38 100,000.00 100,000.00 1,986,616.67 2,979,123.60 992,625.00 5,958,365.27 994,919.44 994,919.44 3,386,999.38 6,469,335.62 9,856,335.00 1,000,000.00 7,828,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,680.21 10,828,680.21 32,699,151.30 Appr v by'~~ „~ ---------- -~/r-%~~-------- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohnike _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. + '"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Illegal Dump Cleanups COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• As part of the Department of Planning and Zoning's code enforcement responsibilities, the department oversees the cleanup of illegal dumps that exist around the County. Known dump sites are brought to our attention by citizens requesting corrective action, and by the proactive enforcement by County inspectors who discover the illegal activity. Known sites may be classified as small or large. Violations for "small sites", are usually resolved by administrative request, or when necessary, bringing criminal charges against a property owner. In some cases, County staff has volunteered to clean up small sites, recognizing that personal action requires less time and energy than administrative or court procedures. Large sites pose a specific dilemma. Large illegal dump sites are referred to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for inspection and corrective action. Currently, DEQ has been advised by Roanoke County of four large dump sites requiring state legal or corrective action. These have not been resolved to date. The Board has appropriated $30,000 over the past three years for the cleanup of illegal sites. In 1994 and early 1995, two small sites were cleaned up for a total cost of approximately $5, 000. One of these sites was in the Cave Spring district, and one was in the Hollins district. Most of this expenditure was for tipping fees at the Regional Landfill. The remaining $25,000 is currently encumbered to cover the cost of .• ~b 2 will be needed to cover the cost of tipping fees. cleaning the illegal dumps on Twelve O'clock Knob Road in the Windsor Hills District. Multiple dumps exist along this road, as this has been a long term isolated dumping area for both household and contractor materials. A contractor has been retained to remove the debris at a cost not to exceed $10,000. The remaining $15,000 If additional funds are appropriated, as requested, for the next fiscal year, they will be used to assist citizens with the cost of tipping fees, or will be used to retain a contractor to clean a specific site. Contractors are only retained when other options to correct the violation are impractical, or ineffective. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. Harringt , A CP Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved Denied Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs • ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Roanoke County Utility Department SSE/R Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program was started in July 1986. Initially work was confined to making repairs to the public portion of the sewer lines. On September 17, 1993, and again on October 11, 1994 the Board of Supervisors voted to amend Section 18 (Sewer and Sewage Disposal) of the Roanoke County Code to allow for enforcing the elimination of stormwater inflow and infiltration from private property. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Below is the status report for both the public and private portion of planned work. Public DRAINAGE AREA o Complete Penn Forest (Back Creek Area) 100 Murray Run 100 Mudlick • TV Lines 47 • Seal Joints 18 • Clean Lines 75 (We have also replaced 3,300 feet of line and have awarded a contract for replacement of Phase 1 Mudlick Interceptor) North Springs Drive (Peters Creek) • TV Lines • Clean Lines • Smoke Test 100 100 100 . , Our crews are continuing to work in the Mudlick Drainage Basin inspecting lines. Also, numerous lines are scheduled for replacement in the Mudlick, Carvins Creek, and Glenvar drainage basin over the next five years. Private Portion No• o Complete Penn Forest (Back Creek Area) Authorizations to inspect requested 523 100 Authorizations received 488 93 Inspections completed 457 87 Category I violations found 50 11 Category I violations notified 35 70 Category I violations corrected 6 12 Category II violations found 49 12 Category III violations found 64 14 (No Category II or III violators have been notified at this time.) It is intent of the staff to have all inspections completed and violations notified by June 1995 with the exception of properties we have not received permission to enter. Date Scheduled to Begin Green Valley Subdivision (Murray Run) Summer 1995 North Springs Drive (Peters Creek) Fall 1995 Montclair Estates (Peters Creek) 95-96 Greenfield Subdivision (Carvins Creek) 95-96 Starmount Subdivision (Carvins Creek) 95-96 SUBMITTED BY: ' 9 ~ ~ ~.. __.._~ ~~dl/U~ t Gary obertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens ~~ { ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER " p AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Report of Claims Activity for the Self- Insurance Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance with the Self-Insurance Program, Ordinance #61494-4, Section 2-86.C attached is the 3rd Quarter (January, February and March) claims activity and status report. FISCAL IMPACT• STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Robert C. J rniga Risk Manag r Motion by: Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs ~' y ~ r N ~ i m ii m z I +1 n 1 N W I u IC v o i ~ ii a w o J Y OD P 1 OI 11 ~ i ii - F r r In ly 1 r 11 OA M p M M I M II N m L E } 01 IO m ~ ~ ~ C Y r W fl- U O 7 ~ • O O 3 a ¢ x m d 111 'C J a m s a rn > N •O V ~ m ~ F N I • O O O r to U U U ~ • W • F- 0 o i o ii Q 0 0 W I u Q ~ o 0 0 0 ~o~~ W 1 11 Q W 1 11 1 11 ~ ~ p I p II ~ ~ ~ \ • m N r• ~ m u U E ~ L m a LJJ > ~ ~ ~ rA O ~ L _m ~ m U W lJJ M ++ O t F- oC a O Y m > a v ~ ~ o f- • L +.+ ~ a ~ • N I ~ W m ~ L Z ~ c m a a r I ~ Z ~ V ~ ~ 4 ~ W (p . M J W U LL Q f .. +) ~ J F W W O W O w a m ~ ~ c I N ~ ~ d' ~ pl OI J U O O ,C c ~ Q w ~ L m O ~ O ~ d d OC U ~ F W m f- U ~ I O O F- W Z d' ~ ~ ~ m Q F •r •r U W ~ ~ L a r o >- ++ w ~ m a 0 0 M ~ N J Ql Ol O 1 O F1 ~ ~ ~ v 1 h 10 T Q ) \ Q N r 7 J O O O O j N ~ ~ ~ In o a Q 2 O O U ~g r m ~ ~ ~ ~ i M ii a w IlO $ IA N N t~ 1 f0 11 W GD 'O P OI < 1~ 1 O 11 J OI m r r M V I N II I- O • I ~ II F C O I m 11 W O m ~ 1 0 11 N N D N N N N I N 11 • ~ to • m m EE L L } d m m m -~ ~ ro ro W C ~ U U I 0 m > ~ S m O S i +I OC Q1 GI Y Y tll a v v a m ~ a m m L a m m ~ ~ ~ m v v v v v ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ a i c c a o 0 0 o m o m F r O. r Q fA U U U U O U O ~ • W H Q O O o o O O O o t o II O O O O O O O O 1 0 11 ~ W 1 11 > ro O O O O O O u'f I r II m ~ ~ U! i ~ ii F-•I w m I r n _ ~ N M I N II ~ ~ Of .~. Of ~ W ~ ~ M M N ~ ~' W H E a W s a m ~ m • v ~ m m r O. O ~ C Of C (A 16 ro m F . W r E O V ~ (,) L Qf 'C L r 9 z 7 N m ~ L 3 m 3 tll ~ D. ~ ~ L L (n Z t0 •O ~ 3 N L L Z ` W ~ L L O. ~"~ ~ W > L O tll m r C 1 {7 tl l L U r p LL O F- W 2 O O B J W m m I~ r ~ W F W dl tll m m >. I a M a~ ~ 1 N ~ c 10 > I 4 W 3 C ld ~ ~ ~ C 1 ~ Ul 1 C E J U O O W +~ 4 C1 y m 4 Q ~ W W ~ OC 3 O O O S 7 O ~ o a a a > U m 3 c~ x I- a 0 i Z W ~ Q r r C , IA Y v •.- r d Q1 L r W }1 }.1 C ~ I11 O i-I D O 7 W O d N O N J p N tr m IA 1[1 ~ 11') If1 ~f If1 M Q Ql O! 01 O O OI OI ~"~ ' J W < r I[1 r M N ~ N ~Y r O O Y 1 r O ~7 \ \ 6 N r N O M J ~ CI O O O O O C7 N OI I[1 Ic to to r r J Z O O O O O O U ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Reports from the Virginia Department of Transportation Acknowledging Acceptance of Roads into the Secondary System: Acceptances effective January through March, 1995, and 1994 Annual Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In January, 1995, the Virginia Department of Transportation implemented a new procedure intended to accelerate the acceptance of new street additions by nearly two months. Under the old procedure of "first-in-first-out", street acceptances were delayed as earlier requests were reviewed and processed in detail. This accelerated process accepts the street addition based on a preliminary audit, and a detailed audit is conducted by VDOT as the changes are coordinated with their other offices. Attached are the following reports from VDOT acknowledging changes to the secondary system: 1. Changes Effective March, 1995 2. Changes Effective February, 1995 3. Changes Effective January, 1995 4. 1994 Annual Report As these monthly reports are received from VDOT in the future, they will be included in the agenda under Reports. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Brenda J. Holton, Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION Eddy Kohinke Johnson Minnix Nickens -~1 VOTE No Yes Abs ~' ~® Gt~y~ 7 1 l II B ~f ~hhR C®1~M®N`V~~LTH o f V~R~IN~A. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET DAVID R. GEHR RICHMOND, 23219-1939 COMMISSIONER April 4, 1995 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator, Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Ref.: Report of Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways Additions Made Effective in March 1995 Dear Members of the Governing Body: ~: ~e ~~ `~ JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER The enclosed report represents all changes to the secondary system of state highways, within your jurisdiction, that were made effective during March 1995. Additions of these new roads were made under the Department's accelerated acceptance process. Any faults found in the additions documents that require your assistance to correct will be brought to your attention as necessary. New road additions are now an official part of the secondary system of state highways and the resident engineer has been notified to begin maintenance of these new roads. If you have any questions regarding this material, please call this office at (804) 786-2746 or your local resident engineer. Sincerely yours, James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer cc: District Administrator Resident Engineer TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 2tST CENTURY • . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ w o s s w ~ ~ ~ .~ W M N N W N P ~ O U p p~~ P P U N N \ \ \ K M N O O O 00 ~ r r O N 1f1 00 N O f0 O O O O d f Gl N N N 7 tl) tll O 10 N N d' N 3 a+ L L O N i+ i+ F- N L L d O O O 3 z z ~ M N p O ~ p p ~- E F ~ f e pp~~ ~ N ~ ~ O~ 7 7 ~ N O O O ~ O OC O d' O N Vl J ~. •.. f0 d' 3 d L L Q m i+ i x E O O N D W L ~O M M d' ++ LL N M N O G~ N ~ Gl N d z w N 1+ ~ i+ O O 7 7 O 7 ~ ~ ~ E o G o ~ d F- a+ s ~ N ~ N E N 2 T 7 OI Q L 2 N d' f0 F ~ ~ a c a+ o r~ x O 7 3 ui J G1 d' OHO O 00 Q N W 3 N 2 L O ++ f gg O U ~ y E m N 2 W ~ ~ x O Gl 1- C V L C L ~ O L W Y J ~ U ~ N T d ~ N p~ Od a+ E O 7 E W d L f0 L W U U U C y E _ •N l0 1+ z C 7 1 O E Y O O ? 7 C d to ++ T N C N C L 7 U N N C a+ N C v ~ o E O • G1 'O Y i+ C N "O Il Vl Y C 7 d O Y U O C f0 O °dd L'f{yI~ ,: ,~ a ~`°MRa TxW°_ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET DAVID R. GEHR RICHMOND, 23219-1939 COMMISSIONER April 4, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, Roanoke County FROM: Martin Law, Secondary Roads Division SUBJECT: Copies of Previous Reports of Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways ~.., tic mA ~~ ~ JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER Copies of three previous monthly reports of additions to the Secondary System of State Highways are attached. A copy of the 1994 annual report of additions to the Secondary System is also attached. Original copies of these reports were sent to Roanoke County as they were issued. Please call (786-7399) if you have any questions about these materials. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY • d ~, ~, • '- ~ ~ ~ .. .,, ~ ~ w O O P P P P w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W N N N N N N V O O P P P P P P ~ N ~ O N N N G C N N N N N N N N N H \ \ \ \ \ \ O pp r r r r r r N O O CO ~f N .t d O O O O J W O C O O O O O d S a+ N ~ W ~ W V N M M L L L O L O ~ O ~ O ~+ a+ ~+ O 2 d d L d N H P O ~ ~ O C p d N . ... -~ ~ O m J m J m J ~ dl \ d \ d \ p~ G ~ 7 7 C 7 7 C 7 7 C 7 7 P .- O O O O O O O O O O O O O OC OC OC OC U U ~ U U OC U U ~O r N L ~ U /0 L 3 W L f O/ N O O O ~ V W N N l0 c0 N N O O O O O ~+ r m N C V- O O ~+ V 7 ~+ O / O ~+ O V O ~ 0 N E d' oC OC ~ OC GC 10 d! L fA T L M N y L Ol W lD L m 2 a 'p ~ C ~ P O M t!1 ~ J N _ N U O N O O O O d C' .- ~ r r r r W N d 3 W L V O d I - a L ~ ~ U O ~ ~ d d 2 N • O ~ O L ~ C a+ O C d D t0 d ~ d > • C d K F- U ~ f C O O t+ N L L '! L L W V ~+ 10 ~ L L ~ d U S U C7 = Z C O O C C O O Q~ E •i+ _ ,Y L L L L m u u ++ ~+ a.• ~' Z y y ~ "O ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ Vf ' L ~ t~ L L M t L M t L M L L M U O U O U 7 C u 7 C U 7 C U 7 C L 2 L 3 L O O L O O L O O L O O N O d O d O ~ •« O ~ •~ O ~ '~ O ~ •M d p~ d a 01 a+ U W ~+ U O d d L ~+ U O d d L ~+ U O d L /- O. Q L a H Q L i- O m d N L 1-- m N F m N F m y d C W L U C O E 4! _ •M N N 'O N G V C 7 d O Y U O C W O OC Y tt~~ MM\ M N N ~ r r d ~ O P P u O C N N N N \ N ~ O ~ CO ~ ~ O a0 u a o c d s M M ~ u t L O fA H '' d ti u ti .E ~ •E ~ p. O ~ ~ p ~ O aG J+ L 10 N 7 T L l0 ~ 2 d t tt O1 i ~ x y E O L W N /0 L Ii ti ti O ~+ LO H ~ ~ O O M 7 Y C a+ E O /0 d1 d' ~ i+ M L V1 H L !p L m z ~ ~ d M V 7 V~ M W N ~ P ~ W W L ~+ F O U Q1 L N L Z N m a + C ~ O L d O L O OC F- U d i+ 10 OC L 00 C ~+ N d L V1 N Qp L J ~ d U ~ O. ~ _ Q m ~ 0 0 W O L 2 U rn ~ ~ ~ c c N d m W C d C ~+ W V O q Y N Y U C O GC O O 0 a 0 H +' 9 00 N d a N 1 W M M M M •O d •O w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w N N N N N N N N W r r r r r r r r O N O N ~ P 00 ~O N d •O N J O 10 O O O O O O O O N d S a, u N N N ~ 2 2 2 V L L ~+ L O y L N 7 = O ar o v G 0 Z N Z 1 - ~! ~ O O -+ P ~ M -• -~ O N N ~ N •O •- E ~ E~ E E u ~ ~ E ~ O O ~+ O ~+ N 00 P ~+ ~+ ~+ `O ~• O O ~ O O O O • P M O .- OC O OC O ~ O K ~ K O OC per. P ). L N N EE W C 2 6 pp ~f O) LL •O P P 00 N N N V1 P M M M N N N N ~ 2 r r r r r •-- r r ~ d d d d d d d W d L M N N V H N N N N o +~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CG N C OC OC OC OC CC K ~ ~ O O L a+ w N L //1 2 p a N d P N N M C T 7 ~ P P ~ N d W L O P M M M O N N N OI L W 1' ~- r r r ~- r r r 10 ~- ~ a L o ~ u m ~ > ~ io vi a, o > > ~ C L E L U O > > U p E = y N E O U V -p O O CJ -x ~ O ~ ~ U N W d C d ~ 3 3 W W T W L J t O L W W ~ C ~ ~ a + c .. C C -~ N tJ 2 G! N d 10 ~0 ~0 O y ,+ L ~ ~ ~ = ~ .~ Y. S 2 Q CL J f V Q pL N a N W ~' OC W E N ~C V `+ V W Z d d N W L L L Y > O O O N O ~ ~ W d C/ W J 7 W 10 /0 10 • • L N ~ 3 3 3 L L L J W L L L b• C V C ~+ C L c0 W t0 7 7 7 t0 [C ~ W ~ x z x f d C W L U C O •}• N v~ a c ~ W O Y U O C W O ~~ M & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V M O M M M \ \ ~ ~ ^ ~ `-• \ M \ \ \ .f ~t \ \ ^ ti O O \ W ~ M ~ ~ ~ N N P O ~ N O N .O pOp ~ N pO~ O O ~O O N N N O N ~ L Y O O O O O O O O O O O O 4 u u V / / / / V / / ~ °u s ~° / u ~' ° s ~ , O 3 Z Z 3 N ~ 2 2 N N N ~ 2 N V L N P u P 01 4 Y u J Y~ Y ' N E E ~E E E E E~ E E E E Y u Y Y Y Y Y O O P • / / O V • N CO ` ~O O CO .! N ~O V N/ P V M / Op / ~ O O ~ p ~ • v~ N 7 O O N 7 ~ 7 O O d' OC O GC ~ O ~ O ~ O O OC O K O CC O OC O OC N ~ / j m L y ~ L _ = / L O Z 0 1 P P pp ~ O N O Y LL 0 ` 00 _ / r r r r r r r ~ N N r N f~ E -~ r r w u d d d u d d u u d u V O V / / V / / / N V / V / / / 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 N 7 7 7 J 7 Y ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O / L / OC C d' OC OC OC K O C OC CC d' OC p N a T N N t L L ~- ~0 JJ 2 o u / d / ~} ~ d P yy11 ~ 00 M O C vi ~ P ~ ~ P ~ ~ N ~ A y E' N . - ~ ~ ~ ? / L L / 1 a W / /0 L > 4 L 2 Y Y C U O 47 O ~ N • ~ ~ ~ H N L ~ L ~ W OC U 01 L L U / ~ ~ 7 m o ~ ° ~ ~ - 3 3 U CC C O o c u rn u C ' L C _ y ~ _ O / q W C C C L N L L u N O L >, W L ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ L L y Y t ~o ..- .~ O / N u •~ X O X O u .~ EE G W s s C~ N W ~ ~ ~a. d U 7 N p1 y P 4 N W C i E ~0 ~ / / / L U L U J ~ Q J ~ ~ ~ 2 W L d L u L j j ~ > C O O O 47 d s s 2 Y W u. W ~ = s = v ~ m ~ ~ c c g ~ g' c c w s s s u u W L 7 Q .L ~0 .L !p ~0 'O O ~ O O O 7 7 7 CO W 1L 1t W V C7 s s s s s d C W L U C & / / N Vf < ~ p P / M1 ~ O Y U Y C 7 7 O t0 ~ ~ ' .f =~ 9 s '.+ ~ N \ Y ~O ~O ~O 1I\ V1 V 1 1fl ~ r r r W r N N N N O N O '1 Y P 00 ~O M ~ W N . - ~t ~- N O u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s v V V CI = 2 O 7 d d V t V L OC O ~+ " O V d L ~ O O ~ L O H 2 J N ~ ~p d 00 N N V Y1 N W N 2 ~ O N N -~ N _ _ _ _ E _ _ _ ~E _ E _ E E E v d o ~ P ~ O P N ~ P O P 7 7 0 7 O 7 O i v ~ ~n ~ i V ~ i v ~ p pC [ 0 C O O O C O O ~ -- O O M ~+ d V L O O) ~+ C = N W L W L w L O O O O O P P W Z V N N N N ~ O O y ~ ~ .- ~ .E ~ ~ .- ~ N ~ N w N w ~ O /~ O. ~ ~ O O O O~ O O O E V 61 OL OC OC OC O 1' 1' CC t V p " J+ a N H L L L H ~ _ W V7 ODD N N 1!1 ~ 10l1 /~ ~ V W C N O O N N N P m P P q ~ ~ .- r- ~ ~ ~ .- ~-- E d V L L V V ~ d V ; ~ 10 N E ~ > U 61 GI p ~ ~ 0 C C 2 ~ ~ O O Y O 4+ 7 .•- ~ m U ~ U d 4 V J < U O ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ N W w 4 W . ?. d N /0 ~4 ppa~~ L 0 _ W _ O L _ L E ~ 6 m J S OD O O N N ~ ~, N d d d d ~ N ~ V V V ~ W L L L L Z 10 10 /0 10 d C7 (7 t7 f.J ~ Y C/ d d J O O O O '~ ~ ~ 'D • _ _ _ ~ t0 m ~ (/1 L L L J V V V V C C C ~ O A ~ i = f a a a i a v m r v c ~& 0 « V _ N N < pN P V M v a ~' Y ~ U C C O O W ~ ~ r ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Apri125, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1995-96. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session to allow social service, human service, tourism and cultural agencies the opportunity to present funding requests to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the FY 1995-96 budget. In the past, these organizations have made funding requests at a public hearing on the county's proposed budget. This format should allow a more focused presentation that will benefit the Board members and the requesting agencies. The public hearing on the county's proposed budget is scheduled for May 23, 1995. Please find attaced an updated listing of organizational requests for your review during the presentations. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Appro ed by, ~- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION ~ Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohinke Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ (,~- I County of Roanoke Contributions to Human Service Agencies FY 1995-96 Budget 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Human Service Agency Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley $4,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) 5,000 10,000 10,000 78,905 10,000 Bethany Hall 0 500 500 2,600 500 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley 2,720 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Council of Community Services- Information and Referral Center 2,500 3,000 3,000 6,310 3,000 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley 2,500 3,000 3,000 4,000 3,000 Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,816 3,000 Bradley Free Clinic 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 League of Older Americans 10,000 12,500 12,500 18,216 12,500 Roanoke Area Ministries 1,333 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,000 The Salvation Army 0 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain 3,500 5,000 5,000 8,200 5,000 TRUST 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 5,500 Conflict Resolution Center 0 0 0 2,000 0 Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 0 5,000 16,660 25,000 16,660 4H Camp 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Literacy Volunteer Program 0 1,053 0 0 0 Roanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center 0 500 500 1,000 500 Blue Ridge Regional Education and Training Council 0 0 0 3,387 0 Care Coalition of Roanoke Valley 0 0 0 1,000 0 Mt. Rogers Shelter Home, Inc. 0 0 0 1,000 0 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) 0 0 1,053 5,000 1,053 Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council 0 0 0 2,500 0 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley 0 0 0 2,500 0 National Multiple Sclerosis Society 0 0 0 800 0 Total Contributions $45 553 $71 053 $82 713 $194 234 $82 213 m:\finance\budget\book-wk\HMSVC96.WK4 04/19/95 03:27 PM Q-r County of Roanoke Contributions to Social Service and Cultural Agencies FY 1995-96 Budget 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Contributions Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed Health and Social Services: TAP $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $39,866 $25,000 TAP-Transitional Living Center 15,000 15,000 15,000 19,943 15,000 Blue Ridge Community Services 79,332 79,332 79,332 115,254 79,332 $119,332 $119,332 $119,332 $175,063 $119,332 Cultural Enrichment /Tourism: Vinton Dogwood Festival $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 Roanoke Symphony 2,500 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway 0 0 0 25,000 0 Art Museum of Western Virginia 0 1,000 1,000 0 Center in the Square 15,000 20,000 30,000 75,000 30,000 Arts Council of the Blue Ridge 2,500 3,000 3,000 5,300 3,000 Transportation Museum 4,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Native American Festival 500 1,550 1,550 0 Science Museum: Operating 0 10,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 Capital 0 0 0 100,000 0 Julian Stanley Wise Museum 5,000 0 0 0 Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating 0 4,000 4,000 8,500 4,000 Capital 0 0 0 47,500 0 Sister-City Pavilion 0 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 Roanoke Arts Commission Art Show 0 500 500 0 Roanoke Valley History Museum 0 6,450 6,450 6,350 6,350 Mill Mountain Theatre 0 8,500 8,500 15,000 8,500 Appalachian Railroad Heritage Partnership 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 Explore (The River Foundation) 0 100,000 100,000 150,000 100,000 Alonzo Stagg Bowl 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 $30,500 $173,000 $195,500 $490,150 $194,350 Other: Blue Ridge Small Business Center 0 0 0 5,000 2,000 League of Women Voters 275 275 275 275 275 VA Western Community College Scholarship Fund 5,585 5,433 5,433 5,274 5,274 Natural Science Center 0 0 0 7,250 7,250 Construction Student Activities Center-2nd yr. 0 0 13,527 40,580 13,527 Site Development -Water Retention and Facility and Parking Improvements 0 0 0 66,379 0 Ms. Virginia Senior Citizen Pageant 0 0 0 100 100 Miss Virginia Pageant 500 500 500 500 500 Roanoke Valley Horse Show 0 0 0 0 6,360 6,208 19,735 125,358 28,926 Total Contributions $156 192 $298 540 $334 567 $790 571 $342 608 M:\finance\budget\book-wk\B-CONT96.WK4 04/21/95 09:07 AM c~- r County of Roanoke Dues and Other Significant Contributions FY 1995-96 Budget 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1995-96 Organization Actual Actual Budget Request Proposed National Association of Counties $ 1,032 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 $ 1,557 Virginia Association of Counties 11,900 11,900 11,900 13,855 13,855 Vinton Chamber of Commerce 100 100 100 100 100 Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce 6,000 6,000 6,000 7,000 6,000 Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Virginia Municipal League 12,971 12,971 14,301 14,301 14,301 Blue Ridge Region 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 National Civic League 200 200 200 200 200 Fifth Planning District Commission 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,900 21,900 Economic Development Partnership 71,667 107,500 107,500 107,500 107,500 Convention and Visitors Bureau Operating 35,000 79,332 107,500 250,000 107,500 Capital-Technology Upgrades 0 0 0 67,716 0 Miss Virginia Pageant-advertising 0 0 0 3,000 0 Virginia Institute of Government 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 Virginia Amateur Sports 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 30,000 Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 First Union Training 0 75,000 75,000 0 0 Roanoke River Basin Association 0 0 0 12,150 0 Total $ 191 870 $ 352 560 $ 382 058 $ 546 279 $ 311 413 04/21/95 09:08 AM BUDGET\book-wk\B-DUES96.WK4 11,I~~~~~l~~lilittllllilill~lil~~llrillllllllllllllllllltllll~IIIIIIIIIII~~II~I~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~Illjjl _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - ~_ _ c SUB CT: ..~ JE r/ ~ N Q 1 /P ~f '1-P~'~ ! (P~~ 1- TrN ~ v~ ~* t «~, Tl c.e., ~ `~ C.i ate, ~' ~. - ~ ~ ~_ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - - ._ -_ .~. - __ '~ s ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ ._ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl~•. __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ - _ - ., - _ - _ - _. - - - _ = = ~~ - = ._ - ... - NAME ~- ~© ~' e. ~ n ~ J ~ n-~ ~~ rS - -- ~~ ~.ti = - - _ _ ADDRESS ,~ ,;r, ~~ = .~ '~. `~ '~ - ~.. PxoNE _ ~ ~ a 5 X01 - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllilllllllllllillllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllillll~ IUI~III~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUj - - ~ ~ - _ z _ - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. (~ APPE CE REQUEST =_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE V CITIZENS COMMENTS w _- _ (~ SUBJECT: `_" , -~- ,~-' ~ ~~..~~c\~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment . whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - a d ill f th l l i ~ n w en orce e ru e un ess nstructed by the majority o the Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may 6e entertained by the Chairman. - -^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - _ c c -_ mllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllliillllllllillillllillilllllllilllllllillllllllilllllillllllllllllllllifilllllliillll 11~ 1,1llIIIIIIIIIIii1111111111~II~~~~~I~III~111111II11~~~~I~~I~1~~~~~~II11~I~~~~~I~~~~I~~~~ill~~~r~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ii~IIIIjU _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - _ - - _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -.- - - suBJECT: ern a~/~~~~~4/f~ ~~t-r~ ~ s = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AC~F~:E TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: c - - ^ Each speaker ~~vill be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. _ - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _. - = NAME ~e7~.1~" L-~,~~~~ - ~r~sic~~~ - ~ _ _ _ ADDRESS ~/~ ;Sh ~°~~ ~4~1;~c% ,~ l ~f3~~9" ~~ ~9-.V~ ~~ ~ -Z ~o l = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHONE ~ - -_ m I I i 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 11lI~IIIIIliI111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IjiJ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ - - - - _ ~, _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: S ~ ati~e Sy ~ ~ ~ ~ y So c ~ _ / _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. .-: ^ _ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. _. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _. =_ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK e _ _ _ _ -_ NAME ~t S S ~ . /~/~d./~,~,v S ADDRESS J _ -_ PHONE ~ ~ ?~ (~ ~~ ~ mlllllllllilllllllliilllllllllliiilllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllillllillllllilllilll 111111 Illlllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllliillllllllilillllillllllllllllllllillillllllllllilllll~ _ - _ ~ - ~ • ~~M ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~. yY \ ~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ APPE _ _ CE REQUEST __ -_ ~(' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~ ~ ~l~t.aY~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~_ +, P ~_ ~ SVDJE~..l• ~ 1<~1.L~°+.J ~ ~ e` ~F ~,~ ~:i~ r r k ~~~`! /, ~`7 ~ <r 1 r.~f f`~.1 ~~J/')~~~~ ~_ _ • 3~ 4. 1'~'~v'~,~~1,~4,. ~.. fc..- ~~~f'~'a~ ~y ~„ 1A~~A~ ~tl~'~_ 't`'_''~-r~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. -- _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl~•. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ c = _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c m _ ~ ~,,L Jf" 'J ~- ~ ~ - l _ _ ~S N c.~j~_ _- ~_ mllllillllllllllllllllllliiilllillllllllllililllllllllllllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllillillllllllllllllillililllllliilllllltll~ 1i11IIIIIlll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ - ~ - - ~ .~ - - - - _ _ ~ _ ~ 4 - ~ ~~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. _~_ - _ _ _ _ - APPS - _ _ - CE REQUEST - -PUBLIC HEARING =ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - . ~~~ t tC~~ ~c~ ~'~ t c F' S`~~ aG'' ~ ~P - • ,._~ - SUBJECT. <^ ; ~ L1 c~ ~, ~Z ~ r C c~-3 c z c~ ~ l r ~ __ - _ = = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may ;~e entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directec ~ the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience member s nog allowed. .- __ ^ Both speakers and the audien~ will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ = Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERIC A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - _. - - - - _. -_ _; NAME - - - -_ = ADDRESS- 2_ ~~ ~~ ~c e ;~~-~ ~,; e c, ~..~_ //N - _. - PHONE cam: ~-~~~ _ l/ -~ G ~ ~~ `~ ~ ` ,S_ 7/ (~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 _ II~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~II~IIII~IIIIIII~~I~I~~IIIIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIwJ - - s -_ t' ~ - - - - _ Y ~~~ - A' - ~ - ~ ~ ,_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - _~ - = SUBJECT: ~i,z"c1- ~~ g ~ e qt_a...~~~ ~ ~ I - ~ Ct , ~ C7 CZ_Cl ~ ~~~ ~f~.Cc~ ~ /~t_ f l ..`~"1 f~' \ Q ~ - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: c __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl~~. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - '_ - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - NAME" ~ h~:~ 1_ ~ - - - - - ~n, sc;n I Jc~ 1 ~ -E-~c~ t I ~ 4 ~c{ 5c~~c~r---I-6-, - - - - - - - - ADDRESS b ~j~ ~ ~.~~1'16~~~~ 1 t 1 ~.~`~"~~i C-'" 'l..~U, l~~ ~1 4' ~~'t 1. I k? ~. ~ ~P - ~ ~ c PHONE ~ c -_ mlllllllllillllilillllilllllllliilllillllllilllllllllililillliillllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllilllllillllllllll ilillll~ Ifiiillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllly - - - _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,= AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ ~ _ _ _ /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~~- ~,;. c.,t~ f~ fi ~ ~ (~ ~' ,('}~ ,1. `j` ~' ,~ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment v whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl~~. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. e c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - NAME I'~-r • ,~ ~. ~ ~_ I.__~ ~. ~-~u~-~ ~ ~ q ''tt ADDRESS i ~ ~~ c C; _ PHONE .~~ Z ` ~ '~ .3 ~.-- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllillilllllllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllililllilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillll~ ~iiiiiu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tt~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ _ _ ~ _ - - - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _. - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - __ ~ _ I /~ nn - SUBJECT: ~ ~~ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time Limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized .speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ - -_ _ NAME - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS C,dA ~ ~C~ ~~, ~~(zo=> ~ l~oA~~o K..~ UQ Z~-/o.3~ - - - - ._ - - - PHONE Sys-oy S I IIIlilllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllltllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllliillililillillllllllllilllllllitl~ lU~~~~~~~~Illlliill~~l~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~l~~ll~~l~~~~~~~~l~~~i~~~~l~lillll~~~~l~~l~~llllllllllll~llllllllllllllillllll~~~~llllllllllljj~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ __ _ - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _ - _ - SUBJECT: d i~-lcr~ o~ i = - - -_ - _. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - _ - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ol~the Board to do otherwise. - ~_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Y - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments '~ with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - -_ - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - ... _ - NAME /~~ ~~ /~ t/ ~~ i ~ ,~--- - - l° ° ~3 ~ ~ ,~ 7 - - - - ADDRESS ',~ ? y ~ ~r/,,co J'` /'~~~ T~~.a.~ - - - - - PHONE ~ 80 - ,2 G ,33 _~ IIIlilllllllllllllllllllllllliilililllilliillllllilillllillillillilllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllilillllllillllllllliliillll~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~iiiiiii~~iii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ ~# 1Q - _ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - _ - ... _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST ` _ /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _, - _ `_ SUBJECT: ~ , ~: , ~. , - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will .= decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oigthe Board to _= do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c = vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = - - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - - - _ - - _. - - _ _ - NaME ~ ~- ~ ~ ,20~-~-5~ , A5~ VGA ~A ~~~ _ _ = ADDRESS Lod ~ ~~ ~zd = - ~ I ~~ ~ ~~o ~~ ~ Z~~3g - _ - - - _ PHONE 3 ~{~ - ~S 1 = Illlllllllllllllllliilllllllllllllilllllliilllllllllilllllllilllllllllilllllllllilllillllllilliillllllllllllilillilllllllllllll~ ~rrrr~~ririiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~i~i~iiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiifuiiiiiuii~iiii~i~i~~~~~~~iiiiiiiiiu~ _ _ _ ~~ _ - ~ - _ _ - .. - - ~ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~, ~~ .-., n .~ suBJEC~r. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~c ~ r~ ~ - ,~~f`, %'~-Y~~t"5 ~ c~~~~ -~ ~~' ~-h~.. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. __ ._ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ c __ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = .~ _ _. NAME ~ ,~ ~~ ll c ~c~ - _ .._ ~~ - c' S dun L," -_ ADDRESS ~O ~uS~ L.-~u~~c-h ~t7~ ~ ~ c~c~~c~ ~ ~~ ~o f ~ PHONE .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 C~ -' fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ~~~~~~~ IDTITITf[IIITIITIIIIIIIIIIillilllllllllllilllllllllllll~l~f li~lil~llllll{Illillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllilllllllll~,~ - - _ - _ ~ - - pew - - ~ - - - - ~" - - - - ,= AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - ~/ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - - - - ._ ,_ - (-~ Q f ( - c __ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - - _ - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOTYING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - - - _. - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - = c = _ _ NAME ~ e ~ l ~ I~ ~ ~ r~ i - _ _ _ _ _ _ ADDRESS ~q ~~ ~ M - S Sa ~ ~ - _ _ - y ~-~ ~Ue ~~ ~1~anokP ~ ~~ ~~a~q - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ - - - ... - - PHONE C ~3 ~~~--R~ ~ ~ - - _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllliilllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllliillllllllillllllllllllillllllllilllllilllll~ ~iiiiuuiiiiiiuiiiuiiiiiiiiiiuuuiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiii0uiiiii~~iiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii _ ~ ~ _ _ _ - l - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - /~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. c__.. _~ ;- ~ APPE CE _REQUEST --~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = SUBJECT: -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c '_ =_ _ _ NAME ~v~' ~l ~'~ ~ ~! a 5 s ~-~ ( F ADDRESS ~ ~vr' 0 ~. C~ ~ i~~ iil- ~ ~ z,~ ~ S ~1 ~ PHONE ~G~ ~ ~~ ~ $ ~ ~% ~ ~- ~ ._.~ ~_ ~iiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiuii~iiiuiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiii.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit~ __ _ i I~ - _ _ ~-~ ~ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ - _ - _ - _ _ APPE CE REQUEST = _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ - SUBJECT: C~iZ~,,l t T~~ ~c7 ~ ~ L_,- ~_ ~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: c __ __ c -- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~ortty of~the Board to _= do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ __ - - - = ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = = = = - - - - - - - - - -_ - - NAME ~jt (_a t~k~t~--ru~ZS ~ 131; ~~Src~ZS ~ ~~,:, l~~~t"~=- - - _ - - - _ r ADDRESS ~~ '7 2~~ C~, ~,~~ -,.~ ,~1~_. A~~.. ~e~~i~ ~°'~ c - ~ - PHONE _~ 4 ~-~_ ~:~ ~, ~; 4'_ = -_ _~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1111111111illlllllillllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllll~lllllllllllll.IIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiItIiIIIIIIIIIIiIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIJ,ll _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ ~_ _ _ _ .:: AGENDA ITEM NO. "' - - _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - = t _ ;~ _ _ - `PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ITIZENS COMMENTS - - ~~ - - ~/ - ,~ ~ ~` - SUBJECT: ~..~!~ ~j~' - t~~~%St~ , ~~?.~~ ~ ! ~~,~l~~l ~;~;~~r.^ ,~~~ ~ ~~ -~~,~`C - ~`' _. I would like the Chairman of the Boar~of Sdpervisors to recognize me during the .- meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = W~~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c _- _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _, ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ =_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - = = _ = = = _' = _ _ .. - - - _ _ = NAME - ~ - ~') i ~ ~' _ •• ~. - ... - ~ ~~ - = ADDRESS % ~ ~~.~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~~~ <~' ~ - ;~~~ ~~, ~~~ ,s ~ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - PHONE ~?~ l~ ~ - - _. _~ mllillllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllllilllilillllillllill illllll~ 1~Iil lllitllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllll llllllllllllllllllllll~l 1 1 1 1 llltlll lilillllllllllllllllllllllillllllliillllllll 1 1 llll~ s - ~ - .~ ~ ~ ~ _ .~ _ - ~~ ~ - .~ - ~ _ ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ .- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS =_ -_ / ~~ SUBJECT:% (' '~ , i ~Cl ~ a~? ~ I ~ I ~ C .__-_ ~ ~ 2~ /']~.~7 :3~. _ I would like the C a rman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. • = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUAL,S SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - -_ NAME ~~ ~ ~-Y, L..~ ~ ~ w` ~ ~ ~~~~~r-; ~ ~ rr~%ri ~s~.~.~ ' ADDRESS ~ ( -,~(~~ ~~ n ~e_.~--~-~ _ C~ ~ iti.k ~ c l' c ~~(, ~_ .~ PHONE ~=~4.~ C~ r~ :~~~ ~ ~ ~ /_ -_ milllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllilllllllllilllllllllillilllllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll IIIIIilltl~ 1U1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillilllll IIIIIIIII II IIII11,~ _ _ _ - - _ _ - ~ - - ~~ - _ _ _ ~ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ SUBJECT: r c.~ c../ F ~(~ _ (' e e~ t h ~ C__ ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ _, ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _. _ -_ _ NAME Q = S ~ ~ ~~dls Jr0.c~ e ~~eG ~ ~ h ic-._ ADDRESS l a.~ - ~_ PHONE _.. ~_ mlllllllllliilllllliiilllllllllililllllilllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllliillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllill 11111111 lUllllllitllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllill11111111111111111111111111I Ilillllll I I I Iilllllilllllilllllllllllilllllllllilll Ililllll1 - ~ - __ - - __ ~ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - APPE CE REQUEST - - _ _ _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMEN'T'S _ SUBJECT: Y -~y~ }-- - _ _. I would like the Chairm of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. ~' and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~ortty of~the Board to _= do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. ._ __ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,,. .. ,~ • _ .~ _ NAME Yl ~..i ~ u~S ~P-~1-e1l~i o~ ~xs~1Ca - .= ADDRESS 3aU~ ~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~--e, ~ a ~~ ~ g __ - PHONE ~-~-~-I- - 3S~q IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllilllilllllilllllillllllllllllliililllliillillllllllllilillllillllllllllillllllllillllillillilllllllllillllnl ll~Illllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~llllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllljj~ _ _ - ~ - _ _ - ~,~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I~l«~.ur«1~ Sc'~nee Cc~~e.a-' - Vj~~,n« ~S~ke~r~ Ed~c~q~~o nQ` ~oun~4~,o~= __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED _ _ BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. .- ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ - c '_ - NAME ~E~.~Y VAST-SX~e 11~ ~ V~~~~n~~ ~Ps~~~~ ADDRESS Q. o.~ oX I y a yS ~bA'(101c.e V (~ ~4 0 3 Q -_ -_ PHONE g57~ ~oy$ _. _ _.. ~_ mIIIIIIiII111111111111111N1111~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ illlllllllll~ 11111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllll Iilllllllllll~llllllllll II1111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllilllll I IIIII~ _ - _ _ - ~ - _ _ ~c~~ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - _. - _ - _ - APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - __ SUBJECT: v~c~~iN~~ w~s-cE~~ ~,oMMU~~7Y Co~~~G~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ c - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c _ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view oniv. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - = =_ = = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = ~ = = = = = = = c c = ~ = - ~ - - NAME M ~~~~ ~, rn ~ C - U-~ ~~ n~ ~ ~eS~~r n ~'oty~~Un',~-~ ~'o II~~ -_ ~ - - - ADDRESS ~. o. ~o~ I~ oy5 I o~no~-e U(~ a~lo3$' - ~ - _ _ PHONE g 5 7- ~ 3 I ~ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,iiiiiiiiiii - ~~~~~~~~~~I~~~,~~ i1llllllllll Illllllllllllillllillllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII l I.IIIIIIIIII IIIIIillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllll l l IIII1~ - ~ - _ ~ ~ _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~, APPE CE REQUEST _ -- _ V ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c = SUBJECT: /-;'' ~ ~ l,?~ t /_ f; c= t ~ L! r_ S. f ~'_1C` ~'~ [;% i~ r_~ t'rl;~ jam. ~_. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK '_ _ _ ?NAME f~ ~ fa ~., , _fY ~"w-i~ /E~ ~~ ADDRESS ._ PHONE `'> ~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ _. _~ mlllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllilll I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ilillll~l 1UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllll l 11 llllllllllil111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ s_ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ - - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ -_ - APPE - - CE REQUEST - _ _ - ~ - __ __ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = - - - - - - - ~ - = SUBJECT: ,~ - _. = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the - meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ _ - - _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to c omment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - _. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - - - - NAME - - - - - - ~ v~~, ~ .tic _- - - ADDRESS~3o ~o-,~.-~a I I<,,~~~. ~~~ a-~o~~~~~~1~° - - - - - - - - - - PHONE _ 3~ a `S ~77~ ~_ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ 1l,I~l~~~~~~lllllll~l~~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~l~l~~~~~~lll~li~ll~~llilllll~~~ll~l~~~~~~~~lllllll~illlllllilll~~llll~~l~~~~~llli~lllll~ - - _ ~ ~ _ - ~ - - ~ - _ _ - ~- _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - 3 - -_ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c - - suBJECT: i(u~. s~ ~ u ~~~ c~ r- [=u N ~, N ~.. _ _ __ =. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to __ do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vv~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - _ - _ c - - - - = - - -_ ~ -_ - - - NAME U ~ I - ~CO ~.~.F~ ~ - - - - - - - ._ - - - - ADDRESS ~~ - - - - - - - -_ C ~ _ - = PHONE '~7 ~ `~5 S^C~ ~~ ~~~s ~ ~-!u. I~e---(e~- --- ~~c...~~,' =_ mlllllillllllllllliilillllllllillllllllillll IIIIIIIIIIIIIillilllllillllllllilllilillllllllillilllllllllillllllllllllilllllll1111~1 ~uiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiir~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~t1~ _ _ - ~ ~ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - 'PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ _ - - SUBJECT:-~~ ~~i oYl ~ ; ~~y - - - - - - f' _ -_ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of S ervisors o recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. = ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vv~th the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = = = = = = = = - - = - = = - = NAME S~ s ~ ~ ~ c.~ eX i ~~S ~~~ (q ~ n ~~~ c -_ - '- -_ ADDRESS ~ ~~~_ ~- Q i ~-, S`~'' V'~ ~~/ ~.~~ ~1' 1. ~ ~ Cam.,..,-~ ~ ~ ~Q,~ o-~ c PHONE 3 `~-S~ ~~ ~ 1 ~~ 3~ 2 t - tiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ~~it~iil llllllllllillllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllilllllll~lillllllilllillllllllliillllllilllllllllllll lillll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ dab _ _ _ _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - - APPEARANCE REQUEST -_ - - - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - _ - ~ -_ * ro ~r~. ~j, `~ ~ = S V D f E\..1 : ~u1~ ~ i lil "` t~ lf,C~ ~(~~-.fvl t ~ '. ,~ U ~ L C: G' ~ ~ - - ~ ~' ` ~ - - - - - -_ - _ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. -_ _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - - _ - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - __ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - ._ __ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - - - - - - - _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - - - _. -_ _ - - - AME - N ~~ ~ ._ = h L G (~S fix, U;~ef~ F~ ~ ~1~v c - .~ ,~ !i' Nt~ ~~ t ~' - ~. - ._~ - - _ ADDRESS ~~133 C~ i ~ ~;~ ,~.~~` - _ - _ ~ - -_ - - PHONE _ _. _~ mllliillllllllllllillilllilllililllllllll IIII II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 1lllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllll l 111111 llllilllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllllj~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - • CJr~ I~C.~ ~ - - SUBJECT. ~ ~ f o ~ u '~ t o ~ C ~/ ~~ ~ ~u ~ ~ ~ ~~G R C~ c~ ~ j - - _ - - -. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. - _ = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. c - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - NAME ~1J - - - - ~ ~ f')'1 A ~ ~~ N - .. - - _ - - -_ - _ _ ADDRESS S ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ o ~ - - - - _ _ _ - - PHOxE ~ g 9 2u ~ b - _ _. ~_ mllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllllllllll ll l IIIIIIIIIilllllllllliillllllillillillllllllllllilllllllllllllillllillilllillllll 1111111 ~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111llilllllllllllilllllllilliillllllllllllllllllillllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - - - - - - ~. - SUBJE - - - - - -. - _ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - - , WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - __ -_ ^ Each speaker wilt be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. = ~= ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. V _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - _ -_ - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - _. - - - - - NAME - - _ - _ - __ ~ = = ADDRESS ~ - ~~ -_ _ - / /~ ~ - - - - PHONE - l ' ~ ~~CJ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllll IIIIIIII Illillillililllllllillill1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1 ~uiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii.~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~t1,l1 _ _ _ _ - ~ ~~, _ _ _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST -_ __ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - ~ - - - _ JE ~ ~ ~ __ I would like the Chairman o the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = __ _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to c = omment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. - ._ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o~ o - - - - - - - = NAME ~ ~o~-~ / ' i ~ ~ D u r~ r~ ~ o - - -_ -_ - 0 - ADDRESS ~~aZ ~ ~o vt. ~ o~ot S w ~~Qnd jcc (~ ~ ~a/ - _ - -_ PHONE ~'lJ ~ ~D' 3 3 ~.~ -.3~, S~/ ~_ lllillllllllllllllllllllllllllillillllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllltllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllljj) _ _ _ _ _ ,~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ -_ SUBJECT: 2-f ~ ~.¢- 2 r 1S Vif ~ h ~ d f ~~ v¢ ~Q~p W~ wvI f =_ Q h "~2 r = =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. -_ -- ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _= Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ __ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c = _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEKLLLF f '' AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AU~'HOR~ :r'.4TION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO FU::'PRE~':NT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK millililllllllllllllillilllillllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIillllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllilillliliilllllllllittillllitiittiittittt~ttl ~iiu~uiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~iuiiiuuiuu~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiui~iii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ui~iiiiiiiuit~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~,~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ - - D - ~ SUBJECT: /~-"'_~1~/,f~,~lY f ~6'~,If~~l,~ l.Je;'C~~C.L~.~ !/1~~;y°,r''T"C.; ~_ ~_ - - ~ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. _ _, ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. =_ =_ = = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c - - - - ._ - - =_ - = NAME '~~~ ~~~/ ~~~~~~ . _ ` ~ ?~~~c~°' ;/~~ - _ _ - - ADDRESS ~ ~'~=~ r/7 ~' - ~ - = PHONE ~i ~ ~ ~ _. _~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1U 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 tjlJ _ _ _ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ >> __ SUBJECT: Wi't' V}1, L~~cr~ - C~ C~ t ~. ~. m Y ~ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supe~isors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to co t mmen whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. __ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL _ Y AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ ~-~. - NAME - _ _ __ ADDRES~ ~ 1 ~ ~'o~ ~ Z-~ C~ - 8 - PHONE ~ ~Z ~'~ ~ 7 (~ Illlllillllllllllilllllllllllliillllliilllilllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllillllllillllllllililllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllm AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 RESOLIITION 42595-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. HtSlton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Resolution of Congratulations to Margaret S. Moles upon being selected Virginia's National Distinguished Principal COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Ms. Margaret S. Moles, principal of Oak Grove Elementary School in Roanoke County, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal by the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals on March 7, 1995, in Williamsburg, Virginia. At the March 14, 1995 Board Meeting, the Board unanimously adopted a Resolution of Congratulations and intended to present it to her that evening at a reception in her honor at Oak Grove Elementary School. However, this could not be done because of the length of the Board Meeting. Ms. Moles has been invited to attend the evening meeting so that she may be recognized and congratulated by the Board and presented the resolution. App~r ed by, ~X-~'' Elmer C. Hod County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Motion by: T- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 RESOLUTION 31495-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MARGARET S. MOLES UPON BEING SELECTED VIRGINIA'S NATIONAL DISTINGUISHED PRINCIPAL WHEREAS, Margaret S. Moles, principal of Oak Grove Elementary School in Roanoke County, was recognized as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal by the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals on March 7, 1995, in Williamsburg, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles was nominated by her school and Parent Teachers Association and was judged on interpersonal skills, resource management skills, and human resource development; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles has shown effective leadership and community involvement by being principal of and maintaining the high standards of a nationally recognized Blue Ribbon School, pioneering the School Renewal Project for the Southern Association of Colleges & Schools, and helping establish and being an active participant in the mentoring program for administrative interns through Virginia Tech; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Moles will represent Virginia this fall at the White House in Washington, D. C. where she will be recognized by the President of the United States. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby extends its congratulations to MARGARET S. MOLES upon being selected as Virginia's National Distinguished Principal; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on behalf of its citizens, TI the Board extends its deepest appreciation to Mrs. Moles for her dedication and outstanding services to the students of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None v-• PETITIONER: REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOC. CASE NUMBER: 10/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 4, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 25, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Assoc. to rezone 3.06 acres from I-1 conditional and C-1 conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked what portion of the property is to be rezoned from I-1 to C-1. Mr. Garman responded that it is the front portion; the rear portion is already C-1 conditional, and the applicant is requesting that conditions be removed from the entire property. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance H 'ngton ecretary Roanoke ounty P anning Commission STAFF REPORT Y PETITIONER: Benjamin Burec PREPARED BY: L. GARMAN CASE NUMBER: 10-4/95DATE: April 4, 1995 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A petition has been filed by Mr. Benjamin Burec to rezone 1.85 acres of a 3.06 acre parcel, from I-1 to C-1 and remove the proffered conditions from the total 3.06 acres. The property is currently divided into two zoning designations, the front 1.85 acres is zoned I-1 and the rear 1.21 acres is zoned C-1, the same proffered conditions apply to both zoning designations. An office building, with a 40 seat chapel, is currently being constructed on the I-1 portion of the property. The chapel is not a use permitted in this district. B. DESCRIPTION The property is located at 5240 Hollins Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. There is a building being constructed on the parcel to be used for offices and a 40 seat chapel. A site plan and a building permit was approved for this office building, however the chapel was not shown on the site plan. Also on the parcel is a single family dwelling used as a temporary office that will be demolished when the new building is completed. Adjacent land uses consist of a single family dwelling west of the property, zoned R-2; on the south, a single family dwelling zoned R-2, and an undeveloped parcel zoned C-2; on the' north is a single family dwelling, also owned by the applicant, which is used as an office and residence, zoned C-2; on the east, across Hollins Road, is a single family dwelling, zoned I-2. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The present I-1 and the C-1 zoning designations have the following conditions: 1 . There will be no commercial printing done on the premises. 2. All activities will be related to the requirements of the denomination. 3. The storage and publishing operations and activities connected therewith will be confined to the front half of the parcel. 4. Property and buildings will be used only for those uses stated, i.e., two duplex units and a facility for the packaging and distribution of mail. The applicants request for a C-1 designation on the front portion of the property, and to remove the above conditions for the entire parcel, would allow all C-1 uses, including the chapel in the new office building. A site plan and building permit has previously been approved for the office building only. Additional use and design standards, specifically additional parking and a required buffer yard, would apply since a portion of the building will be used as a chapel. PART II ~- • A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The property is located at 5240 Hollins Road, approximately 450 feet north of the intersection of Hollins Road and Lois Lane (private road). Tooooraohv/Vegetation -The site rises approximately 30 feet, consistently, from Hollins Road back 200 feet. The site levels for about 400 feet then slopes downward approximately 20 feet to the rear property line. Vegetation is typically field grasses and sparsely wooded. Surrounding Neighborhood -The Hollins Road area is a mix of light industrial and residential uses. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture -The building being constructed is barely visible from Hollins Road due to the rising topography. The building will be approximately 6,500 square feet, including 609 square feet fora 40 seat chapel. Parking will accommodate 33 vehicles with an additional 7 spaces on the adjoining property, which is adequate for the office and the chapel. Landscaping, consisting of evergreen trees, is proposed along the southern property boundary. Access -Access is off Hollins Road. VDOT has no objection to the proposed zoning change. The entrance will be improved as the approved site plan develops. Traffic Generation/Circulation - 1992 traffic count for Hollins Road (Rt. 601) between Plantation Road (Rt. 115) and Carlos Drive (Rt. 616) was 5,626 vehicles per day. It should be noted that the traffic on Hollins Road will have a significant increase after the opening of Hanover Direct. VDOT has no objection to this request. Fire Rescue/Utilities -The building being constructed will use public water and sewer. According to the Roanoke County Utility Department, the existing water and sewer will not be affected. Fire and rescue have no objections to this request. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Plan designates the property as Transition. The proposed development, as well as the other permitted uses in the C-1, zoning district conforms with the intent of the Transition designation. The Transition area encourages uses types which serve as a buffer between conflicting land uses. The subject property separates an I-2 district across Hollins Road from a R-2 district behind the property. • • PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS ~-I In 1986, the property was rezoned from R-1 to the present I-1 and C-1 with conditions to allow the owner to construct an office for storage and packaging of church literature, and to construct two duplexes. The I-1 zoning allowed the storage and packaging use and the zoning conditions limited it as the only use for the parcel. The C-1 district allowed the duplex units on the rear portion of the property and was limited to only that use by the same conditions. Since that time, the owners intended use of the property has changed from the packaging/storage facility to a general administrative office. The plans for the office building were approved in 1994, the plan did not indicate that a chapel would be in this building. Because the applicant no longer desires a use which requires I-1 zoning, a C-1 district would allow a more flexible use of the property with no significant impact to the surrounding area. It would also allow the chapel, included in the new office building, which otherwise would have to be omitted before final zoning approval for occupancy. If the conditions are removed from the rear portion of the property, all C-1 uses will be permitted, currently two duplexes is the only use allowed. If this petition is granted, screening will be required between the applicant's parcel and the adjacent R-2 properties, prior to occupancy of the new building . C7 • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. StiY P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/y y"/ "'~' date f,., d~ ~ teceived by j app cati~ ~e%C~'' PCi9 '~ 4%/y/'75 placards issued: BOS date• Case Number: / ^ e7 ~ ~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): © REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Benjamin Burec Phone: 473-3323 Address: 3 4 9 4 Farmers Road Zip Code: 2 4 0 9 0 Fincastle, VA ~ wner's name: Reformation Herald Publishin Association g Phone: 366-9400 Address: 5240 Hollins Road, N.E. Zip Code: 24019 Roanoke VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 39.05-1-10 5240 Hollins Road, N.E. Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: M-1/B-1 ~ ~~ yl~ ,~~~ 3.06 acres Existing Land Use: Storage and repackaging of church related sq.ft. literature and administrative offices. Proposed Zoning: C-1 For staff use o~iy Proposed Land Use: The adoiaistrative offices and charch services rhich were operating teiporariIy~, use type: froe the property at 5240 aad 5248 Hollins Road rill coatiaae rich basiaess as asaal~ Eras the aer baildiag at 5240, rhich is aor >.a the fiaal stages of caopletioa. Does the parcel meat the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. • If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan X Application fee X A lication ~? PP Metes and bounds description '~': Proffers, if applicable X Justification X >•~;>~ Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners J hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and • am acting with the know/edge and consen f owner.~~ /' Owner's Signature: /r c~~~~~~~.~~i~~v/ V~~" Fvr Stall Use On/y: Case Number ~ " Applicant _ Beniamin Burec The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the .purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning disirict~classification in the zoning ordinance. Be rezoning this parcel, the land will be protected from overcrowding, there will not be an increase of population to the community, and foremost the community will be improved by having an attractive new building with professional landscaping in the area. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. By changing our property from M-1/B-1 to C-.1, it will be more in conformity to the adjacent properties and the general guidelines and policies of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation; and fire/rescue. The impact to the community will be nil, since all previous operations will continue as in the past, except that now it will be coming from a new building, instead of a house and a dilapidated, old building. We plan to enhance the two properties with professional landscaping. The property at 5240, although under a different name, belongs to the same church organization that has ownership of the property at 5248 Hollins Road. At this time we do not anticipate any increase in traffic. The property at 5248 will be used for. the caretaker and some light office work. The old house at 5240 will be demolished to accommodate space for a driveway, parking lot, and landscaping. I. • • eiuiCu(~'a~oueob vL1E'295•EOL~•~ ~ ~ yrac~~' ~ ~ Q 6uip~inq sa~if~o Ieaaua6 ~'~~" 1N3W3nOW W~iO~3~l ~ Llo>z ,rvl l,n .,ou~oy r ~ L • • • • ~ • • enN vroa ~1..,> wi.d LIEI NI `~ 0 t]3tIH]2iV "'~"'~" a 1SI1N3/~dt~Jlt/a N1N3/~3S ]d •13yosu3H pieuo4 3wo33~ pp~( 1 , ~ a, ~ (y} I`1 pl Y Q~I1uH= ~~~7 ~ 'W ~' Z nX yO8G00a~`~'iJ ~rSS3i ~ 3 ~ i s r . __.__ __ ;: .. Fla ~> 0 a? . r?1~0. ~ V ~ >QO j j 0 +~~'jn~ Qan 4r`9Po 4Q->U '-Oa ; - ~ ~~I dSSa 1` '• ~.... ...--_ - _ :o Iva ~ u ~ 'A ~ - slo ~~~'c ~~ 1 ae a 5 \ 1= fir' ••\ •\~ ` \ ~\ ~~.^h - __ sc scl 3 I ~'°~'\\' ':, ;.gig ° ----' ;""+' `~., t ~, ~ s i l`~~. ~•'\ '\ 111_; a~\ ({ ~T da. \ \~. ~`.\ ~~i 'nip` `\ \ r ~ I ` t ! ~ 1 1 r' ~~, IC l - a,'a` \.• ~\ti\ ' ri ~'Q ~ y, ~~~'f ~` QQ$$ I ~ 1 ? i ~' ! ! ~ 1 i ? ~ i o ~ a~. x~` ~ \ `\~ ', ~\` , .~\ „~ ,.bhp 1 7~~ ~'`~ r~ ~ `! 1 ~ I~; '~1 ~ ~ `~ I ~a , `< ~~ ~a `_~_' QQ~~.~ ~=!- \ ` C~ t ,h~* 1 ~ ~ p~ ~* ~ r~_;i 1~~}~y~j.;~; :i )8' g;~% 9 -~ ~ ~ ~ .;,g :'! 1 ~ Cs i i i J:;;:;:y ~:_: j:{:t' Vii:::`.;::::':: .~ ~ J` n I \' ,.L ai \ 1 X yeC ~~ ~r M L t L V :C{~i.:.,::.:: . ~ ::.~ .f I ~: )., : ~...: 1 is tt ~~ ~' :.r~. i F S ~ i t.~: ~ .).. 11 ~ :.<.:.: . ::~ ~:ti !'ZQ f ). 0 . 3.L ~; z ~. y.. . y ~~ 19. 3 u :;•.5.. ~. i .,.. ~a :. ~~.~ i #~ e! .t: s; . :<~ l 1 ~a @~ ' l:~>:• a I .~:; f. .. , i ~ 1 i .::r:: :' rL ;~:1n.;p::;:: g .3 - :~. , ~~e ~ <:~ p i::s::>:...:: :3::'' 1 'i ~ i t ;:r::: .:r::. ~n 1 :>~:::;:<: ~ ~:, a `\ ~ ..t .. i 0 1 :~:: !• I 4 ~~ 1. - ~ - :t: . `d sf.::. . •.~ :< i h i- 1 ( .~f f I t - ( ,~c:::. :: Z - i.f''R F: I (, ; > :;~<;:i;:;: l ~::'''•i ~.. `.{`i:..7 a 4 a. - 3 .~. r ' ;i' f `ti .J. i'2: r t '.:Y:: ifY..<:~~. 1 J ri ~: ~ r ~ .~ S ~i j r h sk b'N / °^1~~~, ~an•. "K Cam."f _~ t. FX~{ ~ ~~t{ -~~ZI ~,Ia! gy .. ? ~ t ra°5F +;!s q e i yQ(v2 ! ! ! F zc ~~ySe _zFy p 4 1;, I _ 2~~ea ~~5 . 2°M`u 1 p r Y~~pg : ~ pxoN ~ ~ r 1:4iiS L°, ' ' ` m i- 3 FB ~ i x :¢i j p ,'1°. LS ids r Z P d _o N~ u b m m U O N~ 1 N + O r 1 ~- I . • • eiul~!A'a~oueoy 6uip~inq sa~iffo ~eaaua6 • • • • ~• • • ~ 1N3W3nOW W~)0~3~1 1SI1N3nab'Jlb'd H1N3/~3S ~ I ~~uezos-coc ~r ~ > ca.. "' ~``'° <<o.z~~~,s,~~•ri«~d _L.,.Yn i mwpooyy,,,~.uwrdue~ .~+,... g ,d •hy~suiH pjovoQiwo~i~ ~- d uI A~ n ~ o Ii `~ d+~ i z ~ I w ~-~ ~ IZ $ ~ 0 3~ ,_ . a~ j~ - H a ~u~x~ _ __---- - I-'IQ nIQ~I~a d 3_ ,L~ z - }n~i ~y _ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~M ~- ~~~~~ _ asl.M. .n~bn~".~ _..._ --- ~ P ~!Nio --3~ - atf08 ;~ - -;, - ~a-- _.. f3JNtl1S1a 1H71S--...-....USb.":--.-.. .._ ._- __ ;~_.~ `_ . SNIITOA~ _ _ --~ :- V1SIQ 1H JS 3.. __ - _ .----'- ~O~I - 'It! 3 - - - - MOO. _... '~ .- .. -. os _ _.._ _ - ..-• _. t~ _._ . ~~cl a a _ ...__._._ ~.. _... .. V' q' ` _ F .'^^' .._ ~ _ O _ ~~ __..__..ap..... ~~- ... ` ..... -_. _. i _ ......._-.. _ .. ~/ . I ....... _ f= •' .. . . -- ., ~. ~ - 1. ~.... _._ _ _.. __ _ _ ~ - .. ' _..... - - --___ .. rt ~ .. +sa~c ' iii= a ~ ,_ _ ,~ r 3 I` ...._.. _ ,. .. _ . --..__..____. _ i ~ _ .C _ s e - h ' ~_ .. _. - .....__ ..,.. .~ .I .I . . . ~ •~ •__-.___..~. tl • ~ -~y~, V w~ It M 0 ' "j i • a e' A • 'i ' d I ® ~ ID \ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ®n ,, R . _ \~\ ~ OYW w ~ a~~.~.~ as.nvw va,uo 7t,l~XZ• > - o o rt a i ,% ~.._.._..t _ -- B Y9, eii ~. ~. . , •. . ., ~ .. ..i °5 f ` --- "'~~ E 60g Fs 4e ' rri o .. _. r.~ i -~ -r•toaa wv~r~.. ~ i~ 1......__...__...® d ~ /' ~ aiscz"~3vr"+~~o ~ ~ 0_ s ~ j:~:id ~ / ' . ,.. _9o:6S ~.d9'W ~ %7~ I % ~~'!~ b _' _. __ __ ~ -- - Q 'C ` f s ~c il3~eRf . i p ._~ 9b -' ~ : ~ _ ._ _ ~ - , ~' i i _ . 4 _ i~ ,• ~ ~ / _ _.......... QO` v , ~;• , .~ ,. / ~J ~~~-" .~TVa ~nvra~w. 1 _ ~d~ ~~$~f ' ~ l , ~ p j`. i ._ ._ -- ._ ;' ,~ ' °° _ ~• s~~6I Rye $ ...._.....__... ,' , i • : , i ,% :' , /' . ~ i ~ - Ee~ aF~ F p _ p ,. ..~' i = ~ 6 i[ Ei3~$ $$e , ~ ; ~ i ' ~ ' ~ ~ Q I ...._ a _ I'111~~Y1 _'DC~•1f1L,~.. ~ -_ ,,,,,, ~~,-- Cldtfli =~ :~^~_.. a.~0~-.. i o A~mrraor ao_moca____ . _.. .. _ _ ,~-raawa~-' ~ tl b ~ ~ v- " 115 '" ~' yyv'~ ~ ~ ~ R- O L L '' ~ MOUNTAIN ~ 021 ~~ h ELEM.SLN ~ . ~ e V N ~» i~ Y N. r~ ~ i p~ O~ JN q~ o NOR DR. ~ ~ ~~~ yco pr~ 616 ~o~ Z ~SZroa"`3_~ao n ° ~~ ' ro ~ KLS4 ~ aR. ~>` 1094 AB tCK f- A m ~ n a -/ ~ ~~~'~~~ VICINITY M~I'.~ ~ __~~'`~~ ~~ -~ .r c ie.n-z-K ---- - ~ ---_ f - ao' I v~` . Nf1RTN _ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOC. AND ZONING TAX # 39.05-1-10 . .~ ~~I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.06 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5240 HOLLINS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 39.05-1-10) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-l, CONDITIONAL, AND C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to I-l, Conditional, and C-1, Conditional in 1986; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.06 acres, as described herein, and located at 5240 Hollins Road, (Tax Map Number 39.05-1-10) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1, Conditional, and C-1, Conditional, Industrial District and Office District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 1 v~ 3. That the owner voluntarily petitions the Board of Supervisors to repeal the conditions, voluntarily proffered by the owner in 1986. The Board of Supervisors hereby repeals and removes the proffered conditions from this real estate. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. 601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 Ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association," dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers and Surveyors; the true place of beginning; thence N. 77° 10' 33" W. 300 feet to a corner marked by an iron pin on the line of the Dowdy property; thence with the Dowdy line N. 11° 21' 00" E. 166.36 feet to an iron pin being designated as "4" on the plat; thence S. 80° 57' 00" E. 300 feet to a point; thence with a new division line S. 11° 18' 22" W. 186.12 feet to the Place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.21 acres. BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. #601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association, dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T.Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors; thence with the Noell property N. 77° 10' 33" W. 413.51 feet to a point; thence with a new division line N. 11° 18' 22" E. 186.12 feet to a point; thence with the property of Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement General Conference S. 80° 57' 00" E. 394.30 feet to an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road; thence with the west side of Hollins Road S. 6° 6' 00" W. 213.48 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 1.85 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in 2 /- ~ zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. DOGAGENDA. ZANING.REFORM PETITIONER: ALLIANCE PROPERTIES INC. ~ „~ a CASE NUMBER: 11 x/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 4, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 25, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Alliance Properties Inc. to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 conditional to C-1 to construct a learning center, located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Don Wetherington, attorney representing the neighbors, stated the neighbors are not trying to obstruct development, they only want to have input on the project. As you can see from the proffered conditions, some of these issues have been addressed. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the garage and if the number of parking spaces should be proffered. Staff responded as follows: the garage will be used for parking the applicant's vehicle as well as to create a residential appearance; the parking is proffered because the neighbors are concerned about the entire site being paved over for additional parking. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached concept plan dated 3/13/95, revised 4/4/95, indicated the relative layout and location of the building, the square footage of the footprint of the building, the location and number of parking spaces and Type C screening and buffering where the property adjoins Rl zoning, with a combination of Option 1, 15 foot buffer yard and Option 2 landscaping, small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen trees, to be planted and maintained in the buffer yard, and to replace the 6 foot screening fence, but achieve an equivalent screening effect. 2) The property will be developed to have a residential appearance in that the roof of the building will be shingled and have a pitch equal to or greater than 5-12, the exterior construction will be brick, residential type siding or a combination of the two, the outside lighting will be for security rather than commercial purposes, such as residential type dusk- to-dawn lighting, and there will be no more than one sign on the premises which will not be larger than 20 square feet, will not be backlit and will be either a monument type sign or a sand blasted wooden sign. 3) The permitted uses for the property under Section 30-53-2 of the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will be limited to the following: civic uses -administrative services, educational facilities, college/university, education facilities, primary/secondary*; office uses - general office, medical office; commercial uses -communications services, studio, fine arts. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: -Concept Plan -Vicinity Map - Staff Report -Other ~, i, . ,~~ f Terrance Ha gton, Se tary Roanoke C ~nty Planning Commission U-a STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Alliance Properties, Inc. CASE NUI~iBER: 11-4/95 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: David Holladay DATE: April 4, 1995 Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. to rezone a .49 acre tract located at 4903 Colonial Avenue from C1C to C1. The petitioner wishes to remove proffered conditions on the. property to allow the Janus Learning Center to move from their present location at 4929 Colonial Avenue to a proposed new structure at the site. This petition has been filed in conjunction with a similar petition filed, by Alliance Properties, Inc. to consolidate and rezone adjacent parcels of land at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue. The property is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The property was conditionally rezoned on 9/10/82 from R1 to Al with the following conditions: 1. The usage for the subject property shall be restricted to the use by the occupant thereof as the occupant's dwelling and as said occupant's medical office facility. 2. A maximum of five (5) automobiles shall be allowed on the subject property during business hours. 3. The home on the subject property, as it now exists, is not to be altered from its present configuration for use as a professional office. 4. The outside grounds and landscaping will be maintained as it presently exists to conform in appearance with the residential homes in the area. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The C 1 zoning district allows for varying intensities of office development as part of either a planned office complex or, to a limited degree, small scale office uses. Retail uses are permitted, to a limited extent, where they are supportive of the office environment. Petitioner has not proffered to limit use on this sig to any particular. permitted use. New commercial entrances will require VDOT approval. Site and building plans will require review and approval by county staff prior to issuance of building permits. ~-a • ~~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE 42595-6 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .49 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4903 COLONIAL AVENUE (TAR MAP NO. 86.08-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, CONDITIONAL, IIPON THE APPLICATION OF ALLIANCE PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to A-1 in 1982, and changed to C-1, Conditional in accordance with the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .49 acre, as described herein, and located at 4903 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map Number 86.08-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Conditional, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Conditional, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of 1 Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1982, which the Board of Supervisors hereby amends as follows: - --b - ~t~ t r t ~ -t -i s-~~ie ~ re ors e ye e ee~a~r ie~ee r~ ~ e .e - e ~ ~ •• ,.• a ~ . ~ - ~~- ~ ... i .. F F ~ .-. -ir~ 3~tE - 3s s 3 6 G e~~ai F.. .. ~ l ~ ~.. ' v. a. v.~- i ~ ~ ~ , .r ~ e~ a s C71L~'l~A - ' ~ ~~ ~ ai t ~ ~ 3 ~t ~ ~ ~ " - _' __.. T'~ ~ .e~T1T~~~ -9-i36 -6- e--c~ l e 1 6~ ~~ ^F^^^ i nr~:~7 n~Ff i ~P _ ,~~ ~_ ~ C~_________~_ _______ ~LTe1 ~P~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - t ~ ~~ rn = e~rs s e ~ a-~ec as ~~~e ~ ~,a-rn- r The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached concept plan dated 3 13 95, revised 4/4/95, indicating the relative layout and location of the building, the square footage of the footprint of the building, the location and number of parking spaces and Type C screening and buffering where the property adjoins R1 zoning, with a combination of Option 1, 15 foot buffer yard and Option 2 landscaping, 2 small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen trees to be planted and maintained in the buffer yard and to replace the 6 foot screening fence, but achieve an equivalent screening effect. L2,)_ The property will be developed to have a residential appearance in that the roof of the building will be shingled and have a pitch equal to or greater than 5-12 the exterior construction will be brick, residential type siding or a combination of the two the outside lighting will be for security rather than commercial purposes such as residential type dusk-to-dawn lighting and there will be no more than one sign on the premises which will not be larger than 20 square feet, will not be backlit and will be either a monument type sign or a sand blasted wooden sign. ~L The permitted uses for the property under Section 30-53-2 of the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will be limited to the following: Civic Uses - administrative services, educational facilities, college/university, education facilities primaryf secondary*; Office Uses - general office, medical office; Commercial Uses - communications services studio fine arts. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northern right of way of Virginia Secondary Route 687; thence N. 2 deg. 15' E. 242.96 feet to a point; thence S. 80 deg. 25' E. 130.0 feet to a point; thence S. 7 deg. 33' W. 243.05 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03' W. 80.63 feet to a point; and being a 0.51 acre tract shown on a survey plat dated April 12, 1988, by Jack G. Bess, CLS. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 i• ,~ v-~- NORTN .~ ~ / ~ M/I I y r ~...,, ~ ,~ _, ,.. / `~• to , n_ ~ 2 G ,~ _ . ~ 16 qua aroY ~sov" 4.~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~a r ti titi~ `r,,, ~ --~ ,/ ~~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ri I ~ - k :y! ~ - „.. , f. ' w.; N s .,.. 1.l7Ae wtiU r ~ ~ _ -. }.IC AC Ir /- t _ ~• Y r' .f~! ~ ~n t. '' / ux,.w ~ I IS ~ . • ~9v / 22 ; asrA wy Y • b ~~~AG u I/ o ~ G' C~ L - p / -- - - ~ - ~ - h1 s t I ~ N ., rA ~ I is ~ / , . ~ 4 r 4%Ae $ .sip .• sro ! T y ~ ~ ~. ~ / ~_ ~ 2t. -t e V / ~ I a 2 .sn ~ ~ ri ~ s s7us •„~ ~ C ' Z- C-1 C ~„~ ! 16 ~ 161 K1 ~ ~ Ito' / .,~, .,,, n ~.. .,~ «„ uia wii ~J~r S 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~- Rt. 68T~~ -~ ~ Cnlonial~ wn iG ' ~ 5 .'G ~~.. ~~ ~- ~~ ~ Awe w zo un s. ~sa~ knfpl~ .e ~. a» s. ~ C_ Z ( ~ 1 .,,. ~ • ~~ _ ~~ * ~ DEPARZMENT OF PI~A,NNII~~ ~ ALLIANCE ~PROPERT~I ES~ INC." AND ZONING ~ ~ TAX # 86.08-1-1 .± . .. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTTi\'G CO\'DITIONS v-~ Location -The .49 acre site is located at 4929 Colonial Avenue, near the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue. The site is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Aiea. Water and sewer service exists or is available to the proposed new development. Topograph~getation -The tract is relatively flat, and the rear/north portion of the property has been filled and leveled at some point in the past. Vegetation is mostly grass and small landscaping and trees. Surrounding Neighborhood -Adjacent properties to the north and east are zoned R1 and contain single family residences. Property across Colonial Avenue, starting with 4920 Colonial Avenue and continuing east, is zoned Rl and also contains single family residences. Properties to the southwest across Colonial Avenue, C&P Telephone and the Lions Club, are zoned C1. Adjacent and nearby properties to the west along Colonial Avenue are zoned C1, and include the Day- Williams Consulting Engineers' office and the Janus Learning Center. Remaining nearby property includes frontage along Brambleton Avenue, which is zoned C2, and includes a variety of commercial land uses. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The concept plan shows a new office building to replace the existing house, with reconfigured parking and screening and buffering areas. No architectural plans have been submitted. Access -Access will be via Colonial Avenue, with any new entrances subject to VDOT approval. Traffic Generation/Circulation -Twenty-four hour traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Colonial Avenue, from Penn Forest Boulevard to Rt. 419 - 6489 (1992) Penn Forest Boulevard, from Colonial Ave. to Chaparral Dr. - 3891 (1992) Merriman Road, from Rt. 1633 to Colonial Ave. - 2474 (1988) Rt. 221, from Rt. 419 to Rt. 897 - 15,000 (1993) Since the proposed new development is a relocation of an existing use at 4929 Colonial Avenue, very little, if any, increase in traffic is expected. Fire Rescue/Utilities -The proposed rezoning and development will have no effect on fire and rescue response. The site currently has public water service only. Sewer service is available to the site. C. CONFORI~~IANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is in the ore land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. This designation V delineates centralized locations that are suited for a mix of high intensity urban uses. The Core designation delineates suburban centers that provide a focus of activity and identity to surrounding communities and that compliment the central business districts of downtown Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. The petitioner's request conforms with Policy C-1 (encourage intensive mixed-use urban development in designated core areas), Policy C-2 (core area is served by an arterial or higher grade street), Policy C-4 (coordinate the design of commercial sites), and Policy C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering along the edge of core areas for the purpose of reducing nuisances with less intensive development, particularly single family detached residential). D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed development of the site for the Janus Learning Center is allowed as a use by right, without additional use and design standards, in the C1 zoning district. Site and building plans will require review and approval by county staff prior to issuance of building permits. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petition to rezone the .49 acre tract from C1C to Cl is consistent with the Core designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Removing the proffered conditions on the .49 acre tract at 4903 Colonial Avenue would allow a business which currently exists at 4929 Colonial Avenue to relocate to the site. Very little, if any, impacts are anticipated to traffic and surrounding land use. No architectural plans have been submitted. The commission may wish to inquire as to the proposed architectural style, given that the proposed building will be in close proximity to the adjacent residential properties. Staff recommends removal of all existing proffers. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: APRIL 4, 1995 ~.J V- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: REZONING OF A TRACT OF ) LAND CONTAINING 0.49 OF AN ACRE ._. ) PROFFERED CONDITIONS KNOWN AS 4903 COLONIAL AVENUE, SW ) FROM C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT WITH ) CONDITIONS TO C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: The petitioners, Alliance Properties, Inc., Thomas E. Wilson and Margaret E. Wilson hereby proffer and agree that, if the property is rezoned as requested, the rezoning will be subject to and the petitioners will abide by the following conditions: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached concept plan dated 3/13/95, revised 4/4/95, indicating the relative layout and location of the building, the square footage of the footprint of the building, the location and number of parking spaces and Type C screening and buffering where the property adjoins R1 zoning, with a combination of Option 1, 15 foot buffer yard and Option 2 landscaping, small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen trees, to be planted and maintained in the buffer yard, and to replace the 6 foot screening fence, but achieve an equivalent screening effect. 2. The property will be developed to have a residential I woons RoGeRS6Y I) appearance in that the roof of the building will be shingled H,azLEGROVE, P.L.C. 67668 v- and have a pitch equal to or greater than 5-12, the exterior construction will be brick, residential type siding or a combination of the two, the outside lighting will be for security rather than commercial-purposes, such as residential type dusk-to-dawn lighting, and there will be no more than one sign on the premises which will not be larger than 20 square feet, will not be backlit and will be either a monument type sign or a sand blasted wooden sign. 3. The permitted uses for the property under Section 30-53-2 of the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will be limited to the following: 2. Civic Uses Administrative Services Educational Facilities, College/University Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary* 3. Office Uses General Office Medical Office 4. Commercial Uses Communications Services Studio, Fine Arts Respectfully submitted, I Woo~S, ROGERS & I'~1ZLEGROVE, P.L.C. ALLIANCE PROPERTIES, INC. THOMAS E. WILSON MARGARET E. WIL By: Of Counsel 67668 r I WooDS. RoGERS & HAZIEGRCNE, P.L.C. James F. Douthat, Esq. #1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 --- (703) 983-7600 267668 v-~- . ,,,, ~ ~1 --~ , , ~_ u i v- ~- .~ ~ ... ~r - ,.,,. ------fir+o-ti -LC-- -- ~_ ~• ~- -------r- ~ I ~ tD N ~ l,'1~ --- y - - - -.._--y- -i --------- _ I~_ I I _ C~rY^ rm..` I ~ _ ~J<Z Or ~ I ~--_~- I i~ N<- _ ~ I' IIIII~ i -~ '--' I L W i ` I Zw N I ~ ~ I ~ Q O w - _ 4: I _ a ~, ~ z UC ~~ R w Q] ~ ~ I J ~ ?~ ~r`~ - I ~~ ~ _ N Z_ ~ - n ~- rr C (.": '- U r+- 2n - :.7 >- ~.-~ L / I n I -, i I .I _______=k___________~J r~l _ :\I ., ~ o I d F QQ a ~ V U W ~ ~ ~ (~ C ~ W C Q L,..- ~ L" ~, H i C OJJ~ _ w G: - - ~ +Z~'~ _ ~ w 3' w ` `~ O R . ~ CcDu~ ;, ~/ - _ ~ ? ~ ~ • .. O W ~. w H GY+ ~ ~' . 1 LzoZ~x ~ ~;---- o ~...: ^° ~ _ n- - -. N C \ Vl -y~ w `~ ~ ^-~7 O v>~ C If~J • ~uUly I Y OF ROANOKE~ DEPT: OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (7031 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 dat-~arybd. //~`J ' roeeived by~~ ,~ °~ appGcatio fee- n PC/SZA ~ S•LI ~ f'- pFacstds issued: BOS di -. __f_ .-~•~ Cass Number. Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: (~ REZONING CTSPECIAL USE . Ql/ARIANCE- Applicant's name: Alliance Properties, Inc. Address: c/o James F. Douthat, P .0. Box 14125 , Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 Owner's name: Thomas E. idilson and Margaret E. j•?ilson Address: 5065 Balsam Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, VA ~p~~L - ~ I Phone:983-7662 Zip Code- Phone: Zip Code: Location of properry• Tax Map Number. 86,Og_1-1 Intersection of Brambleton and Colonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring 4903 Colonial Avenue, Roanoke, VA Community Planning Area: Cave Boring Size of parcel (sl: Existing Zoning: C-1 , cord i t i ona 1 0.49 acres Existing Land Use: Office Building sq.ft. -- °•- -rr••~•••••••• ......,~,~«; ,ease cnec>< it enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. "~ ~ ws v Consultation 8 1 /2' x 11 ' conce t Ian ~ v p p Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer a lication pp Adjoining property owners 1 hereby certify that / am either the owner of the proper or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edo sent~of'the ner. Alli ce^ opert3l~, nc- Owner's Signature: By ,, / ~~ VIRGINIA: • BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: REZONING OF A TRACT OF )PETITION TO REZONE LAND CONTAINING 0.49 OF AN ACRE, ) KNOWN AS 4903 COLONIAL AVENUE, S.W.) FROM C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT WITH ) CONDITIONS TO C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. Alliance Properties, Inc. has entered into an agreement with Thomas E. Wilson and Margaret E. Wilson to purchase the 0.49 acre tract of land bearing tax v- ~- identification no. 86.08-1-1 which is located at 4903 Colonial Avenue. 2. Your petitioners desire to purchase this property in order that the existing structure may be removed and a new structure placed on the premises to house the Janus Learning Center which is currently located at 4929 Colonial Avenue. This property is currently zoned C-1 Office District, with conditions that limit the office use. 3. Pursuant to Section 30.1 et seq. of the Roanoke WooDS, RoGeRS 6z H42LEGRCNE, P.L.C. County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the petitioners request this property be rezoned from its current zoning to C-1 Office District for the purpose set forth above. This petition is filed in conjunction with a similar petition filed by Alliance Properties, Inc. to consolidate and rezone adjacent parcels of 60829 • • - 2 - land at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue. 4. The petitioners believe that the rezoning will • further the intent and purpose of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan in that the rezoning will result only in the elimination or modification of existing conditions on the property to allow the construction of the v-~- building for and the operation of the Janus Learning Center on the site. The zoning classification C-1 Office District, will not change other than to allow the Janus Learning Center to move from its current location and to replace their existing building with a modern state of the art facility. The rezoning will result in an increase of real estate tax base of Roanoke County, conform to the existing office use in the area and cause the property to act as a buffer between the commercial use adjacent to Brambleton Avenue and the residential use along Colonial Avenue. 5. The proposed rezoning conforms with the guidelines Woods. RoGEfts 6z HAZIFGROVE, P.L.C. and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan in that it proposes a use for the property contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and will allow the construction of an attractive facility which can be sited to take into consideration the proposed grade change on Colonial Avenue access the property which will result in a more attractive and efficient facility and improve traffic flow in the area. 260829 • • WOODS. NJGERS 6T Hr1ZLEGROVE. P.L.C. - 3 - v-~- 6. The proposed rezoning will have no negative impact on the adjoining properties in that it will continue office use by an entity that has been located in the area for a number of years. Adequate water, sewer and road access are available to the site and public service, in addition to that already provided to the site, will not be required. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Properties, Inc. Thomas E. Wilson Mar et E. 'lson By : ~ . Of Counsel James F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 260829 • i• i• • ^ ~.. :;,n, ~anuand ~p~uo~o ~) Lgg a~no~ - -- $o' o° I I ~ r I I ..o-,tia m --- I I m ~ N -- II mZ~ o II I Y~ ~ I II mao ,°,,a ~' I I I ~} °~m z I I w I I ``. I Z ~ I ~ I _ I I °zw `~ ~ I ~ w d i ~~ w m I I ~ O aw ~~m U ~ I i a I o ~ ~z' I I I ~ I ~ I ~ I I ~°zw w `~ I - ~ ~ } -' 'I ~ I I I }o ~ -1 F j I Nov' -- - - ---- w \ ~~~ I I mrm 103.0' I ~_ to w U Z W W 2 W W d' U N 2 _~ 2 ~- ~ ~ I W _ I^r/ l~ Q ~ U Q Z p O Q ~ W J W=gyp ZQt~ M L~ ~ O U a ~~ F- ~r~ ~ ~a ~ O ~ ~ m ~ , a~o~ f V-~ V "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .49 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4903 COLONIAL AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 86.08-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1, CONDITIONAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ALLIANCE PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to A-1 in 1982, and changed to C-l, Conditional in accordance with the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .49 acre, as described herein, and located at 4903 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map Number 86.08-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Conditional, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Conditional, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alliance Properties, Inc. 1 ~` 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1982, which the Board of Supervisors hereby amends as follows: ~~ ~ • ~ e--~tsrage e ~ a~--t-~re~e P--eee~t ~ ~ ~ = t ~ ~ d ez ~ ~~~ p Qee ~r e- =e- =es - e e -- ~ ..r."` '7 -r --- - F.. r. -0 l -0 ~.. . ~ . _ _ _ > l ~ ~ / ~ 'e~~Ye'~-{ ~~~J ear-t-h~S~}e.,t *' `-'--- '=-------- ~'---- r-.~r-~- -1 --~ i ~~ se~- ee~-~r ~t € ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ a~e~r~~ g s~~e ~e e~e - e-- e-a ze~ ~e<--~-gee€es s-i-e~r~ ~~~= ; +. v _ ~s-t-s to ~ ~ €ei~-~ ~ e~ ed--- ~~ = r ~_ The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached concept plan dated 3/13/95, revised 4f 4/95 indicated the relative layout and location of the building] the square footage of the footprint of the building the location and number of parking spaces and Type C screening and buffering where the property adjoins R1 zoning, with a combination of Option 1 15 foot buffer yard and Option 2 landscaping, small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen trees, to 2 V '` ~` be planted and maintained in the buffer yard, and to replace the 6 foot screening fence, but achieve an equivalent screening effect. ~L The property will be developed to have a residential appearance in that the roof of the building will be shingled and have a pitch equal to or greater than 5-12, the exterior construction will be brick, residential type siding or a combination of the two the outside lighting will be for security rather than commercial purposes, such as residential type dusk-to-dawn lighting, and there will be no more than one sign on the premises which will not be larder than 20 square feet, will not be backlit and will be either a monument type sign or a sand blasted wooden sign. L~ The permitted uses for the property under Section 30-53-2 of the 1992 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will be limited to the following: Civic Uses - administrative services. educational facilities, college/university, education facilities, primary secondary*; Office Uses - general office, medical office; Commercial Uses - communications services, studio, fine arts. 1/-2- 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northern right of way of Virginia Secondary Route 687; thence N. 2 deg. 15' E. 242.96 feet to a point; thence S. 80 deg. 25' E. 130.0 feet to a point; thence S. 7 deg. 33' W. 243.05 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03' W. 80.63 feet to a point; and being a 0.51 acre tract shown on a survey plat dated April 12, 1988, by Jack G. Bess, CLS. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. alliance 4 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~ _ _ _ _ - - _ ~ _ - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO.~I~ - - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST - -_ - _ / _ `~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS CO = - - MMENTS - - - - _ - = SUB CT• ~--t I ~ ~~-a - 'Q--z A""`' - - UX_ - - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - BELOW: - __ __ ^ Each s Baker will be P given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _= do otherwise. __ - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = V ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _ - NAME ~ a ~ _ Y V ~ erc n - f~'~oti ~ - - - - - -_ -_ - - - _ ADDRESS ~ ~ -~ ~--~ ~`i ~ Z~f ~--o v- - - = PHONE ~ ~ Z --~ ~'~c1 _~ Iliiilillliillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllillilllllillilllilllllilillllllllllllllllllilillllillllllllllilll~ v-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE 42595-7 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN TRACTS OF REAL ESTATE CONTAINING 1.04 ACRES LOCATED AT 4919 AND 4929 COLONIAL AVENIIE (TAX MAP NOS. 86.08-1-2 AND 86.08-1-3) AND A PORTION OF A 1.65 ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT 4350 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.17-5-22) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 AND C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, IIPON THE APPLICATION OF ALLIANCE PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to C-1 and C-2, Conditional, in 1988; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of certain tracts of real estate containing 1.04 acres, as described herein, and located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map Numbers 86.08-1-2 and 86.08-1-3), and a 0.91 acre portion of a 1.65 acre tract of real estate, also described herein, and located at 4350 Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.17-5-22) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1 and C-2, Conditional, Office District and General Commercial 1 District, to the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby amends as follows: 1 E t ~i - ~ ~ c t n r P i g } - g 1 i t P ~ ~-- ei~ l~~ ~6~i- 6 -a i i--i i ~ -e6i~d ei ei~~= i ci ~ ` ~ w }- ~ ~ ~ i 1 1 ~ ~ s c t~ B~ z n a }1 9 ~ ai ~ E 6i 6 1~f1 ~i~ i c~ c ~ 3~ e ~ c - 1 ` ~ e e~rs €€ d ~ ~~~ ar ~ es e ~ I C11 1Tl Cr1= _ - - 7 -- - -- ~ - ~ - p-~e e~s-~~e-- e- e- LR _'1 T ' '~ ~ ~ t~ re-~ e~r~g~r ~ l Ti ~ ~ ~ - ems re ~ea~e ~ ~L-L. .. ~.... i l l ~~ ~~ ~l e~ irz-r--.z~i ~ 3- S ate. S i :ra-r e~ Le 7 '1 : AA Tl•M• ~_ The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached March 28, 1995 concept plan by Shook Design Group which may be modified to indicate direct access between the property and the adiacent Wilco property. ~_ The buffer area and screen fence between the 2 property and the adjacent Anderson & Craighead properties will be constructed to locate the plantinas on the side of the fence facing the adjacent properties consistent with the grade between the properties, i.e., the fence will be generally located along the property line toward the Anderson property and along the access road behind the Harris Teeter building adjacent to the Craighead property. ~3L The retainina wall between the property and the Craighead property will have a finished surface of split face block which has a rough texture and a variety of colors or will have a finished surface of scored faced concrete which has a pattern to resemble stacked block or stone or such similar surface treatment as may be at~t~roved or required by Roanoke County in the site plan review or will be a mortar rubble retaining wall. ~_ The exterior surface of the buildings to be constructed on the property will be brick on all sides and the buildings will not be multi-story, except the Harris Teeter building will have a mezzanine. 5,51 Other than trash collection for the property, there will be no collection or recycling bins other than for the collection of paper. S6~ The Harris Teeter loading dock and dumpsterjcompactor areas will be screened or buffered by a wall, fence or appropriate plantings. S~ The Revco loadingfunloadina area will be located on the side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter building and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumpster will be located in the area between the Revco and Harris Teeter buildings. S81 The fixture mounting height of the exterior site lighting poles will not exceed 22 feet from grade. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 86.08-1-2 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue (formerly Bent Mountain Road) at the southeasterly corner of property now or formerly owned by Craighead (DB 620, page 473) and which said point constitutes Corner 8 on the plat hereinafter referred to; thence N. 2 deg. 15' E. 265.24 feet to Point 9; thence S. 69 deg. 56' E. 21.01 feet to Point 10; thence S. 85 deg. 04' E. 46.45 feet to Corner 11; thence N. 79 deg. 17' E. 84.02 feet to Corner 5; thence S. 2 deg. 15' W. 299.42 feet to Corner 6, an old iron pipe planted on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue; thence N. 78 deg. 35' 150.19 feet to Point 8, the Place of Beginning, and shown as "Beatty Remaining 0.936 Acre" on a plat of survey prepared by C. B. Malcolm, Jr. dated April 17, 1974, which is of record in Deed Book 999 at page 68 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. Tax Map No. 86.08-1-3 BEGINNING at a point in the center line of the Bent Mountain Road, also known as Poor House Road, Corner to C. M. Emerson, and being situate N. 79 deg. 03' W. 310.0 feet from the southwest corner of Tract No. 2 of H. W. Greenwood lands; thence with the center line of said Bent Mountain Road, N. 79 deg. 03' W. 150.0 feet to a point; thence leaving the road, passing an iron pipe at 15.0 feet and along and through other lands of C. M. Emerson, N. 2 deg. 15' E. 950.5 feet to an iron rod in fence by a large forked tree in line of Hartman property; thence with line of same and line of Tract No. 5 of L. L. Greenwood Estate lands, N. 89 deg. 11' E. 147.8 feet to an iron rod in fence, corner to C. M. Emerson; thence with a line of same, S. 2 deg. 15' W. 971.5 feet to the Place of Beginning; and, CONTAINING 3.23 acres, exclusive of road, as shown by plat prepared by Jas. F. McTier, CPE, under date of April 13, 1940, for C. M. Emerson, which map is of record in 4 the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 213, page 532; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by deed dated February 26, 1954, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 503, page 395; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by certificate dated September 3, 1963, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 724, page 138; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto Mick-or-Mack by deed of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 882, page 785; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by deed dated October 30, 1989, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1315, page 1136; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto H. Robert Munday and Joseph C. Thomas, by deed dated March 1, 1976, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1036, page 836. Portion of Tax Map No. 77.17-5-22 0.91 acres of this 1.65 acre tract. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with the amended proffers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .1 Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 5 ~ V~3 NORiH _ = / _ f ~ f ~.,. ~ = ~ c-z ~ _~ 1-- ~ ,R-1 ,,,,, 3 Com. \ ~ _ ~~ 4.26 Ac ~ •/ ~ ` ti~ A~~ Vo. f Qom. _ ` » / ••O• - ,S ± ' \/ 3.86 c/ :s.. Fil•urDltfon Commons ~ ~ - ~''~ ~ - Sera Map Afi08 Inser:'/Y ~~~ I w ~ ~ ~ --+•• '~ X13 O ~ 6 ~ ~ / +^~ !r! +loJ - L ` DSO ~.-- R t. e b ~ __ '__'~ - ~ ~.,: = ~ 2.25 ~ ,C ~ 3° ~ ~ t ~ ~+'J~ •!zo ~ 11 ~ J ~rO ! ~ `r .a 7PC+ C9P. T•ae~ene Ca •90+ ~ ` .f ..:. i ~ / ~ 34 ' f.r: av ~" - _ 23 . ~ ~ ~~~ •~ / ~ L'3 :.c ~ ~~ °~ r' 8 / R' ~ 20 / ~ I1 aT +an. O Ce/ . / .~ J - ~.. ~ I•. r~j1 v ~ 12•i ,c / ' le 6 12 oe zs V Y. •'~ o /I C \a -~S' • Y ~~ t Rt 16T ., ,'aSlO :~ y c Rf.' ~Ilti 3 2 / 30 t• / ~ 16 ~ '~ ,• ~~ 1073 _ ~~0. _IA-~J-71 1I ^ ~ ~ _ I ~' * ~ DEPARZMEN'r OF pLANNIA'G ALLIANCE PROPERTIES I NC•: • AND ZONING TAX # 86.08-1-2; -3. 77:17-5-22 .± ~ 1 , ~~ PETITIONER: ALLIANCE PROPERTIES INC. CASE NUMBER: 12-4/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 4, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 25, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Alliance Properties Inc. to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C-1 and C-2 conditional to C-2 to construct a supermarket and drug store, located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Don Wetherington, an attorney for the neighbors, expressed concern with stormwater management; however, staff has assured us that this will be addressed during site plan review. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission expressed concern with lighting, i.e., the height of the poles and the amount of lighting--glare into the neighborhood. Jim Douthat, attorney for petitioner, stated that there will be standard Harris Teeter lighting but is unsure of what their standards are. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached March 28, 1995 concept plan by Shook Design Group which maybe modified to indicate direct access between the property and the adjacent Wilco property. 2) The buffer area and screen fence between the property and the adjacent Anderson ~& Craighead properties will be constructed to locate the plantings on the side of the fence facing the adjacent properties consistent with the grade between the properties, i.e., the fence will be generally located along the property line toward the Anderson property and along the access road behind the Harris Teeter building adjacent to the Craighead property. 3) The retaining wall between the property and the Craighead property will have a finished surface of split face block which has a rough texture and a variety of colors, or will have a finished surface of scored faced concrete which has a pattern to resemble stacked block or stone or such similar surface treatment as may be approved or required by Roanoke County in the site plan review. 4) The exterior surface of the buildings to be constructed on the property will be brick on all sides and the buildings will not be multi-story, except the Harris Teeter building will have a mezzanine. 5) Other than trash collection for the property, there will be no collection or recycling bins other than for the collection of paper. 6) The Harris Teeter loading dock and dumpster/compactor areas will be screened or buffered by a wall, fence or appropriate plantings. 7) The Revco loading unloading area will be located on the side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter building and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumpster will be located in the area between the Revco and Hams Teeter buildings. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. The motion tamed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance H gton, Sec ry Roanoke Co my Planni g Commission STAFF REPORT ~-3 . PETITIONER: Alliance Properties, Inc. PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 12-4/95 DATE: April 4, 1995 PART I • A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. to rezone a .61 acre tract at 4919 Colonial Avenue and a .43 acre tract at 4929 Colonial Avenue from C1 to C2. Also a petition of Alliance Properties, Inc, to remove proffered conditions from a .91 acre portion of the 1.65 acre tract containing the Wilco service station. These three parcels are proposed to be combined with an existing 3.86 acre tract, site of the Revco drug store and former Mick-or-Mack supermarket, for the proposed Hams Teeter/Revco development. The properties are located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. The 1.65 acre Wilco site was conditionally rezoned on 7/12/88 with the following conditions: 1. Construction of a convenience store with gasoline pumps will be in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by A.T. Williams, and submitted herewith. 2. The mini-warehouses as set forth in the original proffers are deleted; the zoning on the rear portion is to remain M-l, Light Industrial District, but there will be no development on the M-1 portion until there is submission to and approval of a concept plan for such development by the governing body. 3. That the hours of operation shall be from 5:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. * the M-1 zoning on the rear portion changed to C2C during the 1992 revision of the zoning ordinance. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The C2 zoning district permits a wide variety of retail and service related uses. Petitioner has not proffered to limit use on this site to any particular permitted use. New commercial entrances will require VDOT approval. Site and building plans will require review and approval by county staff prior to issuance of building permits. PART II ~~ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTIl`TG CO~'DITIONS • Location -The site is located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. The three parcels on the petition consist of .91, .61 and .43 acres and lie adjacent to the east, southeast and south of the vacant Mick-or-Mack store. The site is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Water and sewer service exists or is available to the proposed new development. Topography/Vegetation -The .91 acre parcel is flat on part of the south half, then climbs steeply to the north. The .43 acre tract (4929 Colonial Avenue) is relatively flat; the rear/north portion of the property has been filled and leveled at some point in the past. The .61 acre tract (4919 Colonial Avenue) is relatively flat on the south half, and the north half slopes down to an intermittent creek/drainage basin. Vegetation is mostly grass, brush and small trees. Surrounding_Nei~hborhood -Adjacent property to the north, west and south is zoned C2 and contains commercial land use. To the east along Colonial Avenue, including areas to the northeast and southeast, is zoned R1 and contains single family residential land use. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The three parcels are part of a concept plan for a new Hams Teeter supermarket and Revco drugstore. A revised concept plan (Alernative 4) has been received which depicts a different building layout than shown on the plans submitted with the rezoning application (Alternative 2). The concept plan shows two new buildings to replace existing structures, and a reconfigured parking lot. Alternative 4 concept plan shows the loading dock and refuse/dumpster area located in the southeast corner of the site, with associated truck traffic directed toward neaby residential areas on the Colonial Avenue side of the development. The concept plan indicates some filling and leveling on the north portion of the .61 acre tract and on the south portion of the .91 acre tract, with a retaining wall along the eastern boundary. No architectural plans have been submitted. Access -Access will be via Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue, with any new entrances subject to VDOT approval. Traffic Generation/Circulation -Twenty-four hour traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Rt. 221, from Rt. 419 to Rt. 897 - 15,000 (1993) Colonial Avenue, from Penn Forest Boulevard to Rt. 419 - 6489 (1992) Penn Forest Boulevard, from Colonial Ave. to Chaparral Dr. - 3891 (1992) Merriman Road, from Rt. 1633 to Colonial Ave. - 2474 (1988) Additional traffic generated from the proposed new development is estimated between 1700 and 2000 vehicles per day. Fire Rescue/Utilities -The proposed rezoning and development will have no effect on fire and rescue response. Water and sewer service exists or is available to the proposed new , development. The revised site plan (Alternative 4) shows a relocated sanitary sewer and `~ stormwater drainage pipe; crossing the property from east to west. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN The site is in the Core land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. This designation delineates centralized locations that are suited for a mix of high intensity urban uses. The Core designation delineates suburban centers that provide a focus of activity and identity to surrounding communities and that compliment the central business districts of downtown Roanoke, Salem and Vinton. The petitioner's request conforms with Policy C-1 (encourage intensive mixed-use urban development in designated core areas), Policy C-2 (core area is served by an arterial or higher grade street), Policy C-4 (coordinate the design of commercial sites), and Policy C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering along the edge of core areas for the purpose of reducing nuisances with less intensive development, particularly single family detached residential). D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed development of the site for a Harris Teeter supermarket and Revco drug store is allowed as a use by right, without additional use and design standards, in the C2 zoning district. Site and building plans will require review and approval by county staff prior to issuance of building permits. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS ~- ~3 • The petition to rezone the .61 and .43 acre tracts from C1 to C2, and to remove proffered conditions from the .91 acre tract is consistent with the Core designation of the Roanoke County .___--. Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use of the site is the same as currently exists or has existed in the past. The new buildings will replace the existing Revco drug store and vacant Mick-or- Mack building. The concept plan represents a significant improvement and expansion of the existing site. A proffer pertaining to the use of berming and vegetation in the area of the loading dock and dumpsters is justified by the proposed site design to help ensure that all visual and noise impacts associated with the loading dock and dumpster area are mitigated for the protection of surrounding residential properties. With such a proffer, staff recommends approval of the rezoning and removal of all existing proffers. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: APRIL 4, 1995 • • U-3 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: REZONING OF THREE TRACTS ) OF LAND CONTAINING 0.91 OF AN ACRE,) 0.61 OF AN ACRE AND 0.43 OF AN ACRE) PROFFERED CONDITIONS AT THE INTERSECTION OF COY,ONIAL } AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 687) AND ) BRAMBLETON AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 221)} BEARING TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ) 77.17-5-22, 86.08-1-2 ) AND 86.08-1,3 FROM C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH ) CONDITIONS, AND C-1 OFFICE } DISTRICT, TO C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF ~'HE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: The petitioners, Alliance Properties, Inc., August Realty Partners, Arthur T. Williams, III, Callie Reed Bowles and Richard L. Williams and Margaret B, Williams hereby proffer and agree that, if the property is rezoned as requested, the rezoning will be subject to and the petitioners will, abide by the following conditions: 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached 28 March ],995 Concept Plan by Shook Design Group, which may be modified to indicate direct access i between the property and the adjacent wilco property. 2. The buffer area and screen fence between the ~ ' property and the adjacent Anderson & Craighead properties will be constructed to locate the plantings on the aide of the 'ence facing the adjacent properties consistent with the grade 67688 v-3 - 2 weep the properties, i.e., the fence will be generally ocated along the property line toward the Anderson property along the access road behind the Harris Teeter building ~~ad~acent to the Craighead property. 3. The retaining wall between the property and the ighead property will have a finished surface of splzt face ock which has a rough texture and a variety of colors, or .ill have a finished surface of scored faced concrete which 'has a pattern to resemble stacked block or stone or such similar surface treatment as may be approved or required by oanoke County in the site plan reviev~ir will be a mortar ubble zetaining wa11~7 4. The exterior surface of the buildings tv be onstructed on the property will be brick on all sides and the ldings will not be multi-story, except the Harris Teeter (building will have a mezzanine. 5. Other than trash collection for the property, there i11 be no collection or recycling bins other than for the lection of paper, 6. The Harris Teeter loading dock and ster/compactor areas will be screened or buffered by a 11, fence or appropriate plantings. 7. The Revco loading/unloading area will be located on he side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter ilding and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumpster will be 7688 ~-3 - 3 - located in the area between the Revco and Harris Teeter ildings. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Properties, Inc. August Realty Partners Arthur T. Williams, IIT Callie Reed Bowles Richard L. Williams Margaret B. Williams By : / - _ . Of Counsel James F. Douthat, Esq, H~r No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street 'P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 {703) 983-7600 M#67688 ~~ - z ~ 1 u i ..~ ~ 1~: f'r•~: -:fit ' rn r~ 1 ' r ~ t ~ f ` ~! ~/~ EEa 3~4W ~ T: ~! rt.il:l: ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ ~~ iii } ~-t3 {~~' 1i !i'f> lii'~7= • I.i ~ .4 ~ ~ !' ~ ~ii~itl-~ r R tt s.:. e t f~ j~l i t t i. '~ ~ 3 - Q' ~ [ j tL17,ti (anuany~owolo~> G89 a3no ~~ ~•- `r`te = r J '+E 1 ~'i ^ b V vl ~\ \ s~ I Q$~~y ~° ~~ ~~~~ ~ • '~:- ,~ ? n f . '~I~ L ~ rr - ~I I N - 1 ~ ~ %':: I of / ~ I~ ' ~~ / • ~ U I // Q~I N // r/•/` ~~ ~~„ r ;i 1 / ' ~ / r / .f0 ~ e l 1 r I~ r r/ g r r r r k ~1 _---~= i / /r ~ i / / •/ - ~ /' / / 4 h • \ ~ ~ rr // r / ~ N $$ g / /. . , ~03 YY~yy+ ~ 6w i i /; ~ pV `~FS~ rr rr r r ~ Y `` ++ / / r ~r r /r~ r r . ~ ~l / r r / 9 ( a .~s.'.~ ~ i i i / • -^ n • //`/ >!~ z ., t ~~ : a r ~,; rr • ;~ z • S ' d 3A02i93~ZtiH'8S2l3902i `SQOOM 6S : E I S6. E Z , 2ldd • • COUNTY OF"ROANOKE" DEPT: OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ~~. ~,o.. use onry date received. ~~ ~ L/f~ +eceived by ,~~~ ~ , /Y} 1 !i~ apP~ie~yoon ee ~ ~ ~ J PCBZA dati/~ J I pla c s rds issued: BOS data- t ~ I Cass Number. ~ `~/~~ f .;._.• ;. , i:''~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): [~ REZONING Q~SPECIAL USE QVARIANCE Applicant's name: Alliance Properties, Inc. Phone•983-7662 Address• c/o James F. Douthat, P . 0. Box 14125 , Roanoke, VA • Zip Code: 24038-4125 Owner's name: Callie Peed Bowles; AT Williams RL & Margaret phone: 989-6400 Address: Williams 4~?4$l~olonial Avenue, Roanoke, VA Zip Code:- Location of property Tax Map Number: g6.08-1-3; 77.17-5-22;86.08-1-2 Intersection of Brambleton and C lonial Avenue Magisterial District: Cave Spring 39 Brambleton Ave . 4 9 Colonial Avenue, Roanoke, VA Communi Plannin Area ~ g . Cave Boring Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning• C-1 , C-2C, C=1 0.43 acres Existing Land Use• Janus Learnin,u, Center, Vacant 0•~,~Tr~.~ ?•ay-t•?illiams Consulting Engineers ; f:. ~ii.: , . ..,... , .•~.:.•. : , i ,:,........ :::,?, ., .i.€ ......:.:.::: Proposed Zoning: C-2 General Commercial District Prooosed Land Use: forsraffusiOnJy- Use Type- Location of Harris Teeter Supermarket and Revco Drug Store Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requuements of the requested disuictr YES % _ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~ O N IF N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. NOT AT THIS TLSE If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this re uest? YES q NO X ~~: :~i~: . . .. .• . •. Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in orderto: ~_ ~~ a.,c aNNu~auun ~urnpleie! riease check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws ~ ws v wS V Consultation 8 1 /2' x 11' concept plan Application fee Application ~~... Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners ! hereby certify that / am either e o net of the pro ty or a owner's agent or contract purchaser end am acting with the know/eda d nsenuf7h weer. Alli n Propert~ Inc. Owner's Signature: By ~-~ / `> • VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: REZONING OF THREE TRACTS" ) OF LAND CONTAINING 0.91 OF AN ACRE,) 0.61 OF AN ACRE AND 0.43 OF AN ACRE) PETITION TO REZONE AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONIAL ) AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 687) AND ) BRAMBLETON AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 221)) BEARING TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ) 77.17-5-22, 86.08-1-2 ) AND 86.08-1-3 FROM C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH ) CONDITIONS, AND C-1 OFFICE ) DISTRICT, TO C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ) TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. Alliance Properties, Inc. has entered into • agreements with August Realty Partners, Arthur T. Williams, III, Callie Reed Bowles and Richard L. Williams and Margaret '~ B. Williams to purchase four adjacent parcels of land bearing Tax Identification Numbers 86.08-1-4, 77.17-5-22, 86.08-1-2 and 86.08-1-3 which are to be developed as the site of a Harris Teeter Supermarket and a Revco Drug Store. 2. The 3.86 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.01-1- Woods, ROGERS 6T HAZLEGRCNE, P.I.C. • 4) to be purchased from August Realty Partners is the site of the former Mick or Mack Store and the Revco Drug Store at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue and is zoned C-2 General Commercial District. The three parcels to be rezoned are located at the rear and side of this tract and X260463 -2- ~~. • are to be combined with this tract for the proposed Harris TeeterlRevco complex. 3. The 0.91 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 77.17-5- 22) to be purchased from Arthur T. Williams is unoccupied and is that portion of the 1.65 acre tract containing the Wilco station that is zoned C-2, with conditions. 4. The 0.61 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.08-1- 2) to be purchased from Richard L. Williams and Margaret B. Williams is the site of Day-Williams, Consulting Engineers, at 4919 Colonial Avenue, and is zoned C-1, Office District. 5. The 0.43 acre tract (Tax Identification No. 86.08-1- 3) to be purchased from Callie Reed Bowles is the site of the Janus Learning Center at 4929 Colonial Avenue and is zoned C- 1, Office District. 6. Pursuant to Section 30-1 et seq. of the Roanoke I Woods. RoG~xs S-r ~'LIZLEGRCNE. P.L.C. • County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, the Petitioners request that the three parcels of property be rezoned from their current zoning to C-2 General Commercial District in order that these three parcels of property and the adjacent 3.86 acre tract, which is currently zoned C-2 General Commercial District, may be used for retail and commercial purposes as the site of a Harris Teeter Supermarket and a Revco Drug Store. The Petitioners further request that all of the parcels be considered as one project for the purpose of this petition to the end that all parcels will be zoned C-2, 260463 • - 3 - General Commercial District and that the review of the concept plan and the submission, if any, of proffered conditions will apply to all parcels as one site. 7. The Petitioners believe that the rezoning will • further the intent and the purpose of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan in that the combination of the parcels to be rezoned with the adjacent ~` 3.86 acre tract will allow the combined parcels to be used for the same purpose for which the 3.86 acre parcel has been used, will cause the existing vacant Mick or Mack building and the Revco Drug Store to be replaced with modern, state of the art facilities, will result in an increase in the real estate tax base of Roanoke County, provide additional jobs for the citizens of the County, conform to existing commercial uses in the area, serve the growing residential community in the adjacent area and along Route 221 and allow the development of the proposed Harris Teeter/Revco complex to be accomplished in a practical, efficient and well planned manner. 8. The proposed rezoning for the Harris Teeter/Revco I Woos, ROCiERS 6T HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. • complex conforms with the guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan in that it proposes a use of the property contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and enhances the existing commercial property at the intersection of Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue. The rezoning will cause the intersection to be restructured in compliance with 260463 • - 4 - an improved site plan, will improve the appearance of and access to the property and cause vacant, unused and unattractive property to be replaced by attractive, state of v- ~ the art commercial facilities. The design of the complex will also shield adjacent property from commercial activity along Colonial Avenue and Brambleton Avenue and improve traffic flow in the area. 9. The proposed complex will have a no negative impact • Woos, RoGeRS 6z HAZLEGRCNE. P.L.C. • on the adjoining properties and will provide grocery and drug store facilities for the surrounding neighborhood and the residents in developed areas along Route 221, an amenity which has been unavailable since Mick or Mack closed. The development will also cause the adjacent Wilco property to be improved by an exchange of real estate to correct the alignment of the Wilco property and the Harris Teeter/Revco site. The rezoning will also cause a portion of the Wilco site, which had been intended for mini warehouses, an industrial use, to become a portion of the Harris Teeter/Revco complex, a use which is more in keeping with the area. The site will be buffered by the natural terrain and C-1 Zoning along Colonial Avenue and will have improved traffic circulation by the alignment and control of access points through site plan review. Adequate water, sewer and road access are available to the site and public service in 260463 5 ~~ addition to that already provided to the site will not be j required. Respectfully Submitted, Alliance Properties, Inc. August Realty Partners Arthur T. Williams, III Callie Reed Bowles Richard L. Williams Mar et B. Williams 2~ By : ~~, Of Counsel I Wooos, Rc~cExs & x~~~. P.~.~. James F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C. Dominion Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P.O. Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 M 260463 X z 4 O V ~ Q h 0 ai C w ~ U ~I ~ m ~0 N~~~ ~~ m~€ ~ I I x I oaf ~_ ~ i r ~f ~x_ ~ I .zc _ _~ Il,;, 6°" n i~~l I I I -Ir-~-- ,, o_= ~~~ CON ~GC mT~ ~m ~ 3 I ~ u a u o' I z$ o ~W ~ za:, z •I oua ~~ s>^ oleo ~ i. 0 a..om o 0 ~• W; a? ~ ~ ~, o; vi ~ an ~~ - ( uany ~oluo~o~) ego a,no "o"z ~ "'< C N `_ ~l a~~ ~o ~~n r~~~ / o V o _ ?_ i~itE~e f1 L i b ~ ° ~ `pY,~ rr ~c~~ ~i~t` 4 + _ _ y~; :F~i c.i u:;.,T ?~`t i~e~ '3i i - . ` i. I21 tE2E S; U~ ~ ~ u ~ i i _ e ±Y s_a 7 'g: ipi .: _: '~}1 ; . . ' ~. p_ ~:7..~b.i S ,= SS i_ i . .-n 2 _ :! _ t'::~ . V.fF.t _. s t O ~W \O ~~ _ 1~~ r------ I i I I I I I I I I ~I . I ~; l P I°° ~• I °~ I c % I- ~ I ~ M1 ~ ~ a a ¢ n ~I o ~ ~ - N I W ~ ~ ~o - I o ?~ I ~ oaaa I _ ~ . _c~_' I c° ~ I I m -=ol 1 .e 3oc ~l G~iOmi c3=9 L;~ i . ~- -~ ----- ~-----~~ I - _ v3 ~ . /•J' ,= I ~ ~) ~ X41 ~ v /y I DAIVE-TMRU I " ~ ~ ~•••~~ I ~ = I i1 4~b I ,: I vim I N '~ ~ ;~ II ~ OUW I (- i 1 ° ~o ~ I ~ a r" ~ \/ I I U I I I I I I I I •;I I .s i ~~ \ i I f~ I ~ ~I I I I s~l / / ^LOl I ~ \ .. , .. ., .. ~~ I _ 2G~ 'O i y~j ~O`~ I 4}y`v1P ^ L. h /~ N s I Z ~ \ 1 4 z S o ~ ~~ -+ o ~ a I in i _ IN~W ,~ o ~~ = ~ ^~UW ;~ ~Q OaV a a ~ C I ` ~ ~ ;~ ~~ i ~~~ ~ 1a~T i ` ~ o~m^ anon i j '' u e ~ I /~ I ~ I ~ I , .k %e I i ~` ~/ N t C~~~ j ~ _- / oo - ,. r _ > n~.~ I "b ~-. of ~~~l.ii S~ ~CiZ I~ ~sl ~p \~ ~~// ~` ~`"'~~ /' \ / /~~~- ~ 1 / f><r. / ~J / J-aI / / / / / Q. / / / ~, ,' /i i i ~~ .~ o- / /~ / / / Pp Ic / '~ / / / / - i / // / / / /°~' __~ // / / / /~ % ~ /// / h. / / / / /K' % // % /~. ,,, ,,,, ,,, .~ . . . ~ 'o am a b u n ~o~o C O ~ J Wince J/ I I ~ o Q > ~ 7c:{j'Jti1 `.~ ^Y Vii'.. Y::?, L• i ~-3 N J C z V 0 0 ai r 0 0 c P 9 Jf C 4 4 w ~_ __ _ _ ~~~y'.i/ / / / z s~ ~ .% ~/ / // / W< i i / / / / ~3 Z 1 / / / / / / Vlww O ' / / / / _ / / / / / ion ~i~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ../ ;'~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / a / / / / / / / / / / / / - / / / m H / / In a / P C !• D v,3 NORTH . --- - - -- - - C- ~~ ,+ ~ • .•~ . ~ - -, ____ °o ` r ~ _ ` ~ R-1 ~~ ~ ._~ a ..oo _ r,.`. . 3 Conc. A.26 Ac S °r ~ ` ~'~ ~ Y ~ \/ 4 .i _ S . ~ 3.86 Ac :~., -... nnomOreron Commons _ ' ~ ~ ~ . Sea Map 8fi08 Inseri A' ~ ~~ .. ~... y :T~.~~ ~.- 1•, 30• ~ - ~~ J ; . IJiy c ~Jrl 4s) 13 6 6: ~ / ':~ 9ry X90! O ~ ``y/ 12 • ~ Q9 ~ .~~ --- ~ T ot~a~e.~' ~.,• _ ~ 2.25 Ae O .'i3~ ., C ~ t ~ +yJS •~ao II ~ Do~Co ? b ,;: Joon C9P. Te:reconrCa Aso. ' e _ 0 ~~? VV / ~\~ LiOAS C:1C 21 ZZ -" / _ 23 ~ ~ ~ e ~. ~ L• ~ .I+ 4 do _ s. e / i ~°or i~~ / -9 19 ~ 1 I 24 a~~sv ~ $I ~~ ~lsr r O r •' ' . '~• /•oo%~ •460 \, -°1' ^~~~ _ .~ t3Ly ,: Rt 16T. ,soS10 :K'q;• Rt.' .~'` 3 , Z / ; 30 !' / 16 r~ ? _ • 1673 _ ~ .. _ ~ O+/ x_,605 .. `~ ' ~. 7: ''S ` Ci//'' `~`* 9\7/ y 5 ~ 1 J w - ~ 1 '* DEPARTMENT pg~p~?g ALLIANCE PROPERTIES INC: ' AND ZONING TAX # 86.08-1-2; -3; 77.17-5-22 .+ . , ~r '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN TRACTS OF REAL ESTATE CONTAINING 1.95 ACRES LOCATED AT 4919 AND 4929 COLONIAL AVENUE (TAX MAP NOS. 86.08-1-3; 77.17-5-22; 86.08-1-2; 86.01-1-4) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 AND C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ALLIANCE PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to C-1 and C-2, Conditional, in 1988; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of certain tracts of real estate containing 1.95 acres, as described herein, and located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue (Tax Map Numbers 86.08-1-3; 77.17-5- 22; 86.08-1-2; 86.01-1-4) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1 and C-2, Conditional, Office District and General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Commercial District. 1 v-~ 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby amends as follows: " ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ti~ ' ^ ^ ~ i-1~i ~~i~e- ssiz i i~ ~ iscriir~~ -wrrr n . r m d~ ~ 9 a~r zr ~ ~~ ra ; ~ ~ , ,., a ~. n ~ 2~ „u,,,, ; a..~ ., a t, ,,,...,... ; .~ ~. 1 P~~~e}~a-~e ~ ~ ~ ~ €e ~ - rt~i rn-t~~ ' re~ts ~~~ ~e FF ~~ ,,,~, ,,,,,,,., ,., y r7 . ~ ~ sr ~ es-as ~ L, ., ~ } L, •, v i t i v„ CCe' e greTL~~t'e ~ LR 7 T L, i- Tv , .7,+..i,.-; l T; , ~ Y ~~~ ,~ d-L, ..,.. ; 1 1 'C~'TG2LLQ'=ifZ'1T-D=gZi'~Si TCtR..T~L'SQ3~1 , ~~- ~ ~ ~ ^ '~(a-Y ..L. EZ" } SaAIi[=.7'O?v"i'~Ge-CTriCt"~~'~ ~ e ~e' ~'a ~ Y 1-A 7 7 ~ AA Tl ~ M• ~lj_ The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached March 28 , 1995 concept plan by Shook Design Group which may be modified to indicate direct access between the property and the adjacent Wilco property. X21 The buffer area and screen fence between the property and the adjacent Anderson & Craighead properties will be constructed to locate the plantings on the side 2 ~-3 of the fence facing the adjacent properties consistent with the grade between the properties, i.e., the fence will be generally located along the property line toward the Anderson property and along the access road behind the Harris Teeter building adjacent to the Craighead property. _,(31 The retaining wall between the property and the Craighead property will have a finished surface of split face block which has a rough texture and a variety of colors. or will have a finished surface of scored faced concrete which has a pattern to resemble stacked block or stone or such similar surface treatment as may be approved or required by Roanoke County in the site plan review or will be a mortar rubble retaining wall. ~4~ The exterior surface of the buildings to be constructed on the property will be brick on all sides and the buildings will not be multi-story, except the Harris Teeter building will have a mezzanine. X51 Other than trash collection for the property, there will be no collection or recycling bins other than for the collection of paper. X61 The Harris Teeter loading dock and dumpster/compactor areas will be screened or buffered by a wall, fence or appropriate plantings. S7Z The Revco loading/unloading area will be located on the side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter V- 3 building and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumnster will be located in the area between the Revco and Harris Teeter buildings. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 86.08-1-3 BEGINNING at a point in the center line of the Bent Mountain Road, also known as Poor House Road, Corner to C. M. Emerson, and being situate N. 79 deg. 03' W. 310.0 feet from the southwest corner of Tract No. 2 of H. W. Greenwood lands; thence with the center line of said Bent Mountain Road, N. 79 deg. 03' W. 150.0 feet to a point; thence leaving the road, passing an iron pipe at 15.0 feet and along and through other lands of C. M. Emerson, N. 2 deg. 15' E. 950.5 feet to an iron rod in fence by a large forked tree in line of Hartman property; thence with line of same and line of Tract No. 5 of L. L. Greenwood Estate lands, N. 89 deg. 11' E. 147.8 feet to an iron rod in fence, corner to C. M. Emerson; thence with a line of same, S. 2 deg. 15' W. 971.5 feet to the Place of Beginning; and, CONTAINING 3.23 acres, exclusive of road, as shown by plat prepared by Jas. F. McTier, CPE, under date of April 13, 1940, for C. M. Emerson, which map is of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 213, page 532; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by deed dated February 26, 1954, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 503, page 395; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by certificate dated September 3, 1963, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 724, page 138; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto Mick-or-Mack by deed of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 882, page 785; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia by deed dated October 30, 1989, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1315, page 1136; and LESS AND EXCEPT, HOWEVER, that certain tract of land conveyed unto H. Robert Munday and Joseph C. Thomas, by deed dated March 1, 1976, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1036, page 836. Tax Map No. 77.17-5-22 BEGINNING at an iron on the easterly side of U. S. Route 221 at the northwesterly corner of property owned by Mick-or-Mack Stores Company, Inc., and being corner also to L. C. Leffler property; thence with the easterly line of U. S. Route 221, N. 40 deg. 59' 52" E. 325.22 feet to a point, corner to property 4 ~/-3 of James T. Anderson (DB 767, page 404); thence with line of Anderson property S. 4 deg. 5' 54" W. passing his corner at 420.96 feet and continuing with the line of Nelson Craighead property (DB 589, page 376) in all 695.48 feet to a point, corner to Richard L. Williams property (DB 978, page 230); thence with the northerly line of Williams property along the center of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement; N. 81 deg. 39' 44" W. 109.0 feet to an iron at the southeasterly corner of property of Mick-or-Mack Stores Company, Inc.; thence with line of same, N. 4 deg. 19' 40" E. 429.57 feet to an iron; thence N. 85 deg. 40' 20" W. 89.35 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 1.65 acres and being shown on map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated December 28, 1978. Tax Map No. 86.08-1-2 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue (formerly Bent Mountain Road) at the southeasterly corner of property now or formerly owned by Craighead (DB 620, page 473) and which said point constitutes Corner 8 on the plat hereinafter referred to; thence N. 2 deg. 15' E. 265.24 feet to Point 9; thence S. 69 deg. 56' E. 21.01 feet to Point 10; thence S. 85 deg. 04' E. 46.45 feet to Corner 11; thence N. 79 deg. 17' E. 84.02 feet to Corner 5; thence S. 2 deg. 15' W. 299.42 feet to Corner 6, an old iron pipe planted on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue; thence N. 78 deg. 35' 150.19 feet to Point 8, the Place of Beginning, and shown as "Beatty Remaining 0.936 Acre" on a plat of survey prepared by C. B. Malcolm, Jr. dated April 17, 1974, which is of record in Deed Book 999 at page 68 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. Tax Map No. 86.01-1-4 BEGINNING at an old iron in the northerly right of way line of Virginia Secondary Route 687, being the southwesterly corner of the Virginia Wood Hase property and the southeasterly corner of the property herein described; thence, N. 86 deg. 02' 04" W. 70.89 feet to an old iron; thence S. 89 deg. 17' W. 40.88 feet to an old iron; thence S. 86 deg. W. 51.16 feet to an old iron; thence S. 84 deg. 34' W. 24.36 feet to an old iron; thence S. 85 deg. 13' W. 40.57 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the right of way line of Va. Sec. Rte. 687 N. 5 deg. 50' E. 46.28 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 9 deg. Ol' E. 130.16 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 9 deg. 01' E. 130.16 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 87 deg. 32' W. 196.86 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 81 deg. 37' W. 12.89 feet to an iron pin in the easterly right of way line of U. S. Route 221; thence with the right of way of U. S. Route 221 N. 40 deg. 59' 52" E. 684.04 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the right of way of U. S. Route 221 S. 85 deg. 40' 20" E. 89.35 feet to an old iron; thence S. 4 deg. 19' 40" W. 429.57 feet to an old iron; thence N. 81 deg. 39' 44" W. 75.18 feet to an old iron; 5 V'3 thence S. 4 deg. 19' 49" W. 256.60 feet to the Place of Beginning. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. alliance.2 6 ,~ r~ a` Gpr .~- V ~,,,~ WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVG, P.L.C. First Union Tower, Suite 1400 10 South Jefferson Street P. O. Box 14125 Roanoke, Virginia 24038-4125 Facsimile 703-983--7711 Telephone 703-983-7600 FACSIMILE COVER PACE SOR M~TLTIPLE TRANSMIBBIONS ~_; % ~'~J FROM: James F. Dauthat DATE: April 25, 1995 DIRECT DIAL Np.: 983-7662 CLIENT-MATTER NO.: 10805-001 PAGE X OF +** .Y w w w w f w** w w w++#* it w w+**** x w w w t*+ w w w To :_ Donald L. wetherington To; David Holladay Firm Name: Fax No.: 343-4480 Time Sent: To: Tim Gubala Firm Name: Fax Np,: 772-2030 Time Sent: Firm Name: Fax No.: 772-2108 Time Sent• TO: Firm Name: Fax No.• Time Sent: + * * * * * w w * * * w * ~ w + + t + * * w w * # * w w w w w * * * w w + Comments: The attached proffered conditions contain a new paragraph no. 8 which improves the characterization of Response No. 1 in the attached letter from Emily Watkins at Harris Teeter. I assume the attached letter from Harris Teeter and the modified proffered conditions are acceptable and am faxing copies to Roanoke County. Please Contact me if there are any questions regarding this matter. + * + ,~ * w w * + + ,r w + * + * + + w w + * * * * + + * * * * w w * * + Please notify us immediately at 703-983-7600 if facsimile is not received properly. w w * * + + + t w * w * * + t w w w w * w * ,r * w w * ,t * + w + * * * w w Operator: * * + i * w * * * * + w # * * * ,t ~ w w * ,t + w w w + + # * * w w + + ,r a The information contained in this facsimile message ie attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. It you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify ua by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. M~260911 .VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE i IN RE; REZONING OF THREE TRACTS ) OF LAND CONTAINING 0.91 OF "AN ACRE,} 0.61 OF AN AC12E AND 0.43 OF AN ACRE} PROFFERED CONDITIONS AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLONIAL ) AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 687) AND ) SRAMBLETON AVENUE (STATE ROUTE 221)) BEARING TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ) ~~.~~-5-22, 86.08-1~2 ) AND 86.08-1-3 FROM C-2 GENERAL ) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH ) CONDITIONS, AND C-1 OFFICE ) DISTRICT, TO C-2 GENERAL } COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ) IITQ THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF jSUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: The petitioners, Alliance Properties, Inc., August Realty Partners, Arthur T. Williams, ITI, Callie Reed Bowles and Richard L. Williams and Margaret B. Williams hereby proffer , and agree that, if the property is rezoned as requested, the rezoning will be subject to and the petitioners will abide by ~~ the following conditions: 1. Tha property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached 28 March 1995 Concept Plan by Shook Design Group, which may be modified to indicate direct access between the property and ttie adjacent Wilco property. 2. The buffer area and screen fence between the property and the adjacent Anderson & Craighead properties will be constructed to locate the plantings on the side of the fence facing the adjacent properties consistent with the grade 67688 -z- Between the properties, i.e., the fence will be generally orated alcng the property line toward the Anderson property along Lhe access road behind the Harris Teeter building s. djacent to the Craighead property. 3. The retaining wall between the property and the aighead property will have a finished surface of split face ock which has a rough texture and a variety of colors, or ill have a finished surface of scared faced concrete which a pattern to resemble stacked block or stone or such imilar surface treatment as may be approved or required by ke County in the site plan review or will be a mortar le retaining wall. 4. The exterior surface of the buildings to be onstructed on the property will be brick on all aides and the ildings will not be multi-story, except the ~:arris Teeter ilding will have a mezzanine. 5. Other than trash collection for the property, there ill be no collection or recycling bins other than for the ollection of paper, 6. The Harris Teeter loading dock and umpeter/compactor areas wail be screened or buffered by a ~~kvall, fence or appropriate plantings. 7. The Revco loading/unloading area will be located on the side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter ilding and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumpster will be M:#2I~67688 3 located in the area between the Revco and Harris Teeter r ~uildings. I, 8. The fixture mounting height of the exterior site r. ..p.. ~~ fighting poles wi].1 not exceed 22 feet from grade. ~I Respectfully Submitted, .I Alliance Properties, Inc, ~I August Realty Partners Arthur T. Williams, III Caliie Reed Bowles Richard L. Williams (i Margaret B. Williams II By: / ` Of Counsel ames F. Douthat, Esq. Bar No. 1191 OODS, RQGERS & HAZLEGRQVE, P.L.C. first Union Tower, Suite 1400 0 South Jefferson Street .0. Box 14125 oanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7600 ~~ M#z~~6sa r~~ x z ~~~~~~ Y 4'I ~ ~~~ ~rr ~ ,- _ ~~___~ r •R aye ~ ' ~ j~ ..A_ #~ Fe ,' l+~,-- ~~L Y .. • r ~~r Q DC~ + ~ r~ `+~ [r~ _ + e_j-- -' acJ n°~ ^~~ 4~ I 7~ : c !,~" ~t ; 48 , i I L ~ ~~~ a1;~ ~N ~ G.: ~~~' NCO Yr} 2 ~~Y f.e,. ju''Jtt ~ ~ ~ 1IIRIltl (~ i ij v ~ l i i~ l f Z~ ~i~~~•r! !.~!lii~ r .~(1~;{'tt ~; ~ Y t(1 riai } c i ~t l,,~ r ~ ~ C~ F +~(~ ~ j( ~'~1~'jlt+)~i ~ ~ ~ ~ rs ~ 1 , 1 Y! ~1~F3 ! !•li~ ~8'r~~ 1't l:ti~l~>i~~; , • ~ ~ J c . ... c I s 3 ! ~'1UJn~ 1Dt~O.p ~ ¢~ ~ ~fO CC OUP ~ 1!~ O t~ o r,.^ .; 1'7~Q- E ~ ,;;~~1 It / _ _ t Y" _ _ ; ~~ ti A • ~ r r k- . ~ ~ y r .. f• ~ ~\ ~T ~ ` a ~L-~- /( \\ ~~.\\ C C S I G j Harris Ttleter, Inc. ~ ~ Pos[ Of`r~e Sox 33129 Charlotte, N.C. 2S?33.3f?9 Tefephor~o; (704) 845.3100 April 25, IS95 Mr, James F. Douthat Woods, Rogers & Haziegrove First Union 'power, Suite 1400 .1Q South Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA ?4038-~Z25 llear Jim: ~~.:~ r~ Flj'R c5 ''?5 i~: S~ o~~c~~a~ ~Ax In response to 14ir. Wetheringwn's letter of April 24, 1995, I offer the following respo»Ses: l • The light poles calf be 20 ft. high wi[h a combination of 1, 2, ur 4 lult~irlaires per pule. T'lie lamps art 400 watt metal halide. 2. At this time, I don't know what the building design/materials will be or what the retaining wall zttaterial will be. T would suggest that a neighborhood represetitativc, perhaps David Radford, meet tvtth Harris Teeter representatives &t the appropriate time to work together to mutually satisfy their needs. 3. Barris Teeter will agree to rc~uirina the large lrttckti turn off tlteir cilgiiics ulid rzftigeratioll units while unloading in the late night i~,1ti early morning hours. Jim, ,i certainly hope this will meet their needs as Harris Teeter wants tb he 2 good neighbor and an important part of their community. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Since 'Er ' y B. tkins Director o~ Real Esrate & Construction 1313W/cJP v-Y VIRGINIA'S ~L~riL, PAR K An outdoor classroom an Going history museum ena6lin sisitors to learn shout the land uikUi(e, and early American cisdG~ation through a diversity of experiences at rho • American Center for Rare anc Endangered Specie: • The Environmental Educatior Center of Virginia • American Wilderness Par4 • Native American Indian Park • Blue Ridge Settlement at Milcpost 1 IS on the Blue Ridge Parkway Administered 6y Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code §10.1-1600 et. seq. in partnership with The River Foundation I.R.C. §501 (c) (3) Post Office Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-8508 (T03) 427.1800 FAX (703) 42T-1880 April 24, 1995 Mr. John Hartley Department of Planning & Zoning Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hartley: Re: Rezoning of 5.93 Acre Tract of Land on Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial DIStrICt This letter is written to confirm our telephone conversation of this date. Upon the recommendation of Supervisor Dr. Nickens, the Virginia Recreational Facilities .Authority is agreeable to the County's tabling action of the rezoning for an additional thirty (30) day period. Please see that this property is considered for rezoning by the Board at its May 1995 Meeting. Should you have questions or need additional information, please let me know Let me thank the County Staff and you for the fine cooperation shown to the Explore Park. Sincerely, George W. Nester, CM, AICP Contract General Manager G WN/n `J-`{ County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: April 24, 1995 RE: Continuance of Explore Park Request to Rezone 5.93 acres from EP to AG-3. Dr. Nickens has discussed the above cited rezoning with Mr. George Nester representing the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. With Mr. Nester's concurrence, Dr. Nickens will be requesting that the above rezoning petition be continued for an additional thirty (30) days which would place this item on the agenda for May 23, 1995. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the March 28, 1995 meeting, there was a public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. The Board approved rezoning parcel 1, consisting of 2.0 acres, and continued the request for rezoning parcel 2, consisting of 5.93 acres, to April 25, 1995. The Planning and Zoning Department has notified us that they have received no additional information concerning the 5.93 acres parcel since the March 28, 1995 meeting. Attached is the original rezoning information, and Mr. Harrington will be present at the meeting to answer questions. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, t ~~x ~i' /fir ~ ~~~ `y~, Y.J Jon than W. Hartley Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Director County Administrator Planning & Zoning ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens V-~' PETITIONER: VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES CASE NUMBER: 6-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQuESr Petition of VA Recreational Facilities Authority to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres from EP to AG-3, located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Responding to questions from the Commission, staff pointed out that the 2-acre parcel required a variance because it didn't meet the 3-acre requirement for the AG-3 district; a letter from an adjoining property owner who requested a delay was handed out at the work session. The Commission asked about the easement and who will benefit from the sale of the properties. George Nester commented as follows: as a condition of the sale of the 5.93 acre parcel, we will require a 50-foot easement in order to have access to the remainder of the property; the two-acre parcel is under contract; the monies received from the sale of these properties will go to the Explore project. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other ~ ~ i~ Terrance Harrington, Secretly Roanoke Cou2ity Planning Commission v-~` STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Va. Recreational Facilities Auth. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley FILE NO.: 6-3/95 DATE PREPARED: March 7, 1995 A. , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority proposes to sell two parcels occupied by single-family residences that have been determined to be surplus property. To insure clear title and improve marketability, they are requesting the property be rezoned from EP, Explore Park to AG-3. The staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts from this proposal. B. DESCRIPTION The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) is requesting to rezone two parcels containing 2.0 acres and 5.93 acres respectively from the EP, Explore Park district, to AG-3, Low Density Agricultural. • The two parcels have been determined to be surplus property by the Explore Park Board of Directors. They are located at the end of Hammond Drive which is located in the Vinton Magisterial district. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In the Explore Park district (Section 30-71) there is a requirement that only lands owned by the VRFA can be zoned EP. The only uses allowed under this EP zoning are those included in the Explore Master Plan approved by the Board in June 1993, which does not explicitly permit single family residences. While the use could be continued as a grandfathered activity, this could restrict interested buyers and limit financing options available. Under the proposed AG-3 zoning the minimum lot size is 3 acres. On February 15, 1995 the Board of Zoning Appeals considered and approved a variance for the existing 2 acre parcel. i v' PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background: The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority, the governing body for Explore Park, acquired land beginning in the late 1980's from willing sellers for the creation of Explore Park. In order to generate revenues for current projects, the Authority has reevaluated its property holdings and decided that a few parcels, including the parcels in question, could be sold without jeopardizing the long range Explore Park project. The parcels in question were created before 1980 and until 1992 were zoned A-1 with a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. In 1992 the parcel and surrounding area was zoned AG-3 during the Countywide Comprehensive Rezoning. In June 1993 767 acres, including the two acre parcel in question, were rezoned to the Explore Park (EP) district, a special district specifically established and designed for the Park. Existing Characteristics: Each of the lots in question presently contain a single family residence served by individual wells and septic systems. Access to the properties is by way of Hammond Drive, with the 5.93 acre further served by a 15 foot wide easement. Surrounding Area: The surrounding area consists of open space and scattered rural residences. Immediately adjoining the 2 acre parcel to the north is the Blue Ridge Parkway. With the exception of other properties owned by VRFA, which are also zoned EP, the entire area is zoned AG-3. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Development Potential: At this time there are no proposals to modify the existing uses of the property. Future use would be governed by the AG-3 district which is limited primarily to low density residential and agricultural uses. Neither of the parcels could be further subdivided (except under provisions for a family exemption) due to the 3 acre minimum lot size and the requirement for 200 feet of public road frontage. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This areas is designated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan as Rural Preserve. The proposed zoning and current use would be consistent with the Plan Map and policies, given the historical configuration of these properties. Petition: VRFA 2 File No.: 6-3/95 1 • • STAFF CONCLUSIONS The rezoning proposed is primarily to permit the sale of property otherwise encumbered by a special zoning designation designed exclusively for the Explore Park. The present use which predates the 1992 zoning ordinance and limited potential for further development preclude any significant impact from this proposal. Approval of this request would ensure a clear and unencumbered title and should substantially improve the marketability of these two properties. PART III No proffered conditions are recommended by staff. Petition: VRFA 3 File No.: 6-3/95 ~ . y '~"' 2. 87,120 _~ Is the application completel Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v nts v ws v Consultation X 8 1!2" x 11' concept plan Application fee (WAIVED) X Application ~'~'s Metes and bounds description `"< Proffers, if applicable X Justification ~-: Water and sewer application X Adjoininfl property owners . -.- l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and copse f the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ ~/y COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 - Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date me i ace. -~y~ applicauon ~CC/ PCIE. ~_;'~ c-~ J l~ placards issudd: BOS ~~ O Casa Number: ~ _,~^~1'E!~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): Ll REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Rupert Cutler Phone: 427-1800 Address: P • 0. Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24014-8508 Owner's name: Virginia Recreational Facilites Authority Address: P • 0. Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia Phone: 427-1800 Zip Code: 24014-8508 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 71.00-1-6 ~ 71 .00-1-8 2393 Hammond Drive ~ 2331 Hammond Dr Vinton, Virginia 24179 .Magisterial District:Vinton Community Planning Area: Roa noke River Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: Explore Park (EP District) ~ 5.93 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential ~ 258.310.8 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: AG-3 Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential ~ For Staff Usa Only use Typa: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. - If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: • ~ v ~- • Foi Staff Use On/y: Case Number Applicant Virl;inia Recreational Facilities A ho ; r~ fR„pP,-r r'„rt P,-) The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This lot is presently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. The Explore Park Board of Directors has declared the lot surplus. To enable prospective buyers to finance the purchase will require a conventional zoning designation. The adjoining properties ~ are in private ownership and are zoned AG-3. This rezoning is compatible with existing neighborhood zoning. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Long Range plans for the area suggest a planned unit (Explore type use). Existing land use is residential for the subject lot. Existing land use for the area is predominantly AG-3. Although this reversion is inconsistent with general plan, it is consistent with existing land uses of neighborhood. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact will not be noticeable to adjoining neighbors or the community. No development is proposed: The existing single family use that is currently in place will be continued. Property is presently served by private well and septic system. VIRGINIA'S i .n I- L~JriL PAR K An outdoor classroom and 6crng history museum enabling ~viton to (earn about the land, wildlife, and early American citvLzadons through a dirersiry of e>~eriences at the • American Center for Rare and Endangered Species • The Environmental Education Center of Virginia • American Wilderness Park • Native American Indian Park • Blue Ridge Settlement at Milepost 115 on the Blue Ridge Parkuny v~ January 24, 1995 - - -: ~ .~,~ County of Roanoke Planning Department 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Sir: Re: 2332 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District Enclosed are two (2) completed applications for the rezoning of land owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. This property has been declared surplus by the Authority. These efforts are geared to the liquidation of these properties. Proceeds from the sale will be used to offset part of the accumulated debt of the Explore Park. These properties are currently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. Adjoining properties are zoned AG-3. Both parcels are used for single family residential uses. The requested rezoning is compatible with existing zoning and land uses. Both units are served by individual wells and septic tanks. The two (2) acre parcel at 2331 Hammond Drive will require a variance. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot area in an AG-3 zone of three (3) acres. This parcel does not meet that minimum requirement. Other regulations or the AG-3 Zoning District can be met. Thank you for waiving the rezoning and variance fees for the Explore Park. Should you have questions or need additional information regarding these matters please contact me. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance. Administered by Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code §10.1.1600 et. seq. in parmership with The River Foundation I.R.C. §501 (c) (3) Post Office Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-8508 (703) 427-1800 FAX (703) 427.1880 Sincerely, /~ George W. I`Ies er, CM, AICP General Manager Enclosures c: Dr. Rupert Cutler File z .y DEPARTfgNT OF PLANNING AND ZONING v-~- 0 NORiH VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY 71.00-1-6 ~ 71.00-1-8 ~" V-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.93 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 2393 HAMMOND DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 71.00-1-6) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EP TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AIITHORITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995, and continued until April 25, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a parcel of land containing 5.93 acres, as described herein, and located at 2393 Hammond Drive, (Tax Map Number 71.00-1-6) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of EP, Explore Park District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of VA Recreational Facilities Authority. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center of the outlet road leading to Va. Sec. Rte. 1029, being the southeasterly corner of John T. Schaaff property and being the northeasterly point of the property hereby described; thence with center of the outlet road along the line of Alvin B. Hammond property S. 0 deg. 15' 57" E. 307.57 feet to a planted stone; thence S. 13 deg. 00' v-~ W. 25 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with a new line through Harvey J. Schaaff and Lola G. Schaaff property and along the center of an outlet road S. 56 deg. 17' W. 188.03 feet, more or less, to a point; thence still with the center of the said outlet road S. 47 deg. 00' 40" W. 295.96 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Mary Belle Schaaff property; thence with the said line of her property N. 38 deg. 13' 20" W. 558.74 feet to an iron by a corner post corner to Alvin B. Hammond property; thence with the line of the Alvin B. Hammond property N. 7 deg. 53' 15" W. 36.22 feet to a point in the center of an outlet road; thence along the center of the outlet road and with the line of the John T. Schaaff property the five following courses and distances: S. 81 deg. 50' 40" E. 145.39 feet to a point; thence N. 80 deg. 44' 40" E. 99.74 feet to a point; thence N. 52 deg. 21' 10" E. 129.97 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 17' 10" E. 130.99 feet to a point; thence N. 88 deg. 34' E. 282.04 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing 5.93 acres and being as shown on a map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated 14 December 1978 of record in Deed Book 1117, page 289 in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office and designated as Tax Map No. 71.00-1-6. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.vazec.425 ~iiii~iuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiii~i~~t~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c _ _ _ - - uBJECT: -U ~ti _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK '_ _, _ _ -_ NAME -- ,, _ .. ~ C.%C~ ~~U ~ ~i~h_G /'f ~ ~ - ~1 ~ ~?l-t.N (~j `.c~ l~~t?h, ~_ ADDRESS `' (..,`1 G~'1 ~ c',. c' ,S c-.~' __ a, '~ PHONE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/E S- _. miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ~i~~~n~~~iiii~~ii~~ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~u~~ui~u~~~~~i~i~ii~i~~~iiii~ii~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~iii~~~i~~~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~iiniiiiiu~ _ _ _ ,~.~,~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - - APPE CE REQUEST __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _ - - - suB cT: - _ - _ _. -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - = BELOW: - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speakm~ as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GRDUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ -_ - ~~ ~° _ ADDRESS - _ - _ - - PHONE ~ ~" ~d ~ - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m ~iiiifiuuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiuiiiiiiiiiiiuiuiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiit~ _ _ 3~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS _ - SUBJECT: ~--, ~U _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ VVIIEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ _ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty ofgthe Board to _= do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ = = = _ = _ _ = - _ = - = - ~ - ,= NAME - - ADDRESS -_ 0/ - PHONE~~~ ~ ~ ~9 ~ ~ ~ /~..3 m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~iiii~iiiiii~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~itl~ :~~ -~ 3~ _ _ _ _ 4f _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE X CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ \ l (~ SUBJECT: _~ O . Co . ~ CYO h ~~ I I ~ l.~ ~ q 2i~ .~ ~. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~or~ty ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ._ ^ INDIVIDUA,L.S SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. -_ - -_ NAME (~ z ~ra~ __ ADDRESS 56 ~ a ~. ~ d ~ ~. , ~ _ c c _ PHONE g `~ ' g 4 S ~ -- ~_ UJIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllliillllllllllllllllillllllllllll l llllllillllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllilllllt111 ~ -_ _ _ _ _ _ l ~ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - _ _ APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS - - - ~ - - - - - - ,, SUBJECT. c~~ ~~. ~ ~c ,, - - -_ - - =. -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ Wf~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = - ~ - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: = - -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to c omment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. _ __ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Y _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = _, c = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - - _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ _ -~ NAME ~5 c~ /~ ~~ C'~~ ~G~s ~T~ D~. ~ ~' __ - ALDnGSS tL? [. `7 S' /~~ .e r l~ /"~ Q ~Y7 ~ - ~. - - .~ - PHONE 7 7.:~2 --~~ r 7~ - _ -- ~_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillillllllllllilllllllllll l IIIIIIillllllllllllillillilllllillilllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllll~ 1llllll~lllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllll I IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIiIIIIiIIIIIIiIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIII,U ~~ - _ _ _ -=#~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ =_ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - SUBJECT: - -. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WF~N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ - -_ NAME ~ s ~ ~ o z°~ e ~--- __ _ ADDRESS `~ ~ __ _ __ PHONE ~~C ~ ~- ' U'9 .~~> ~~ z~ -~ _~ Iilillllliillilililillllllllllilllilllilllilillllllliillllllllillllllllllllillllilllllilllilllllilllllillllllllillllllllillllll~ ;~3'I ~-~ AMI -RV a ALLIANCE for the MENTALLY ILL of ROANOKE VALLEY TESTIMONY SUPPORTING BLUL~•~i~A~ 1~~q-go~~~y~~~(~~,977-3470 BUDGET REQUEST IN ROANOKE COUNTY - Rpril 25, 1995 My name is Mildred Willis. I am,,/president of ~"thde~ Alliance For The Mentally I11 - Roanoke Valley.l The Alliance is comprised of families and friends of the mentally ill and the mentally ill themselves. Our goal is to improve the quality of life for those afflicted with chronic mental illnesses. Many of the services our loved ones require come through the Blue Ridge Community Services. The Alliance would like to bring to your attention a few facts: the need for services for our county residents who suffer from mental illnesses; and the lack of support and participation, and -even - lack of priority, with which the County Board of Supervisors views our family members. First the lack of support and participation: During the one year period from 7/1/93 to 6/30/94 BRCS served 1,079 county residents. The current range in per capita contributions by cities and counties is from $51.24 to $.23 per capita. The average local government per capita contribution was $15.39. The county board of supervisors may be shocked to learn that the County of Roanoke contributed 5.98 per person. This gives the County of Roanoke the dubious ranking of 93 among the 95 counties. Secondly: The need for services for our county residents who suffer with mental illnesses. I will cite a few: * As a preventive meast-re, we need Case Managers to see the mental health consumers as frequently as needed in their residential settings, whether in their parental homes, their own apartments or homes, or Homes for Adults. This will offset crisis situations from developing; and will prove cost-effective since it can prevent expensive and traumatic hospitalization. * Emergency Services Staff are needed to respond promptly where a crisis is occuring. To collaborate with the Sheriff at the site and support the Sherrif in his efforts; and to begin assessment of the mental health consumer in the situation. * Transportation is needed to assist mental health consumers in accessing services needed, in all aretas of our county. ,,,(, ~/~! ~FG~ t`~.D~ ~l_' /~ L ~, G-`~ 5 '1'"c~ r'1~ L~ G1 i ~ c; ".,~rv~~ f-t ~'~ l`-~`Yrn~ rrl * v~ s ~e needed ~c--i -~n-ese- who had onset of n_ ~ _~.n -d ~}-so ~'L~ t~ G~s~/1J ..~ ~-~,c~L f-~~2J~ ~ 5 UJ.z~~u~.J11 The Board of Supervisors has the power in setting the budget for Roanoke County, to make these needs a reality with dollars and not cents (pennies}. The Alliance asks you to fund Blue Ridge Community Services, the agency responsible for delivering these , needed services to our family members, to a more compassionate 6 level than $.98 cents. I thank you for this opportunity to`spei~k and your kind attention to our request. Mildred Willis ~~ Affiliate of The National Alliance for the Mentolly 111 and The Virginia Alliance for the Mentally 111 , : '~ ~ ~ ~, f ~/, ,~ ~;~I~ ~ ~l i~ ~-I 1. My name is Anita Cronise, and I'm here on behalf of CARE - Critical Assistance Repair for the Elderly - sponsored by the LOA Area Agency on Aging. 2 . The Roanoke area i s faced wit h a 1 arge and growing number of persons over age 60 who are at risk of losing their homes and independence due to deteriorating living conditions. Their incomes, often below poverty level, are barely enough to meet daily expenses. 3. As homeowners age, so, too, do their homes. But because of physical disabilities and limited, fixed incomes, many elderly are not able to get needed repairs done. As a consequence, some elderly are living in unsafe housing because their roofs are leaking, ceilings are falling, floor boards are rotting, and heating, electrical, and plumbing systems are nonexistent, inoperable or dangerous. 4. Our concern is that without repairs, the elderly must either move or continue to live in unsafe, unhealthy conditions. Our goal is to help the elderly remain safely at home. 5. Only non-cosmetic repairs would be done. Examples of repairs we have been requested to assist with are: Overflowing or unworkable septic systems Inoperative heating systems Inoperative electric systems Inoperative water pumps Roof replacement 6. When the LOA/AAA assess the need for housing repairs, we are able to also assess other needs - such as Meals-on-Wheels, transportation, legal services, and other supportive services, that we are able to put in place. 7. CARE would like to join with the County in addressing the home repair needs of elderly residents. We are requesting that the county allocate at least $1,000, but as much as $10,000 for home repair for at least three to four low-income elderly county residents. This would also improve the housing stock in the County. 8. Any money the county con allocate will be used for direct home repair services for elderly county residents only. 9. We appreciate your consideration of CARE's request. 706 Campbell Ave., S. W. P.O. Box 14205 Roanolxe, VA 24038-4205 LOA AREA AGENCY ON AGING Roanoke County Presentation (703) 345-0451 ~ax Mac~ine: (703) 981-1487 Good afternoon. My name is Murry White and I'm a Roanoke County resident and President-elect of the Board of Directors of the LOA Area Agency on Aging. I'm here today to talk to you about Meals on Wheels. The LOA does a lot of things and works with a lot of older people in the Fifth Planning District, but one of the most visible programs we have is Meals on Wheels. Last year the LOA provided nearly $225,000 in services to County residents. Of this, nearly $40,000 was for Meals on Wheels. We served 74 County residents 10,533 hot, nutritious meals that helped these County residents stay in their own homes instead of having to go to a nursing home. As important as the meal is, the volunteers who deliver the meals are just as important. Volunteers like me get to know the people we see week after week, year in and year out. We make sure they are allright. We volunteers are the eyes and ears for the LOA and sometimes we are the only oustide person the meals recipient sees on a given day. My Meals on Wheels volunteer experience is the most gratifying thing I do . We have requested $18,216 from you this year. Last year you allocated $12,500 and we're grateful, but we sure could use an increase. It takes all the money we get from every source we can think of to provide the services we do. Thank you for your attention and please be generous when considering our request; after all its to help older County residents maintain their dignity and independence. And don't forget Lunch on the Lawn on June 9. I've got some order forms for you. Each $10.00 ticket buys meals for Meals on Wheels. This is how we help ourselves by raising money. Hope to see you there or maybe you'd like to get the lunch delivered to your place of business. In this as in all our services, we aim to please. Nations/ Ce•• Management Portriareh~p A Divi.riau Of Connertirut Com»uuity Care. /ur. efHelping OlU.cr Persons Remain As Independent As Possible" ~~ I • United Way of Roanoke Whey POf}flBf /~flCy Cities oT Roanolxe, .7alem, Cli~ton Bore Fd Covington • Counties of Roanolxe, Allegliany, Botetourt ~ Cram ~- i Proposal to the County of Roanoke From the The Blue Ridge Small Business Development Center For Budget Year 1995/96 Program Name: Small Business Development Center Objective: Economic development through the expansion of existing businesses using a professional program of one-on-one counseling_(provided at no charge), business training seminars and workshops. The result will be increased investment, new jobs and an enhanced tax base for Roanoke County. Target Grouns• primary: Existing businesses with 5 to 100 employees. Secondary: All other existing businesses with fewer than 500 employees. iVlethods: A. A professional staff dedicated exclusively to executing this program. B. One-on-one direct assistance to businesses and individuals in the areas of financing a business, marketing a business, developing business plans, record keeping and other business growth topics. C. Provide a referral network (i.e., sales leads, business referrals, volunteer professional assistance, strategic alliances, etc.) through the existing business relationships of the Small Business Development Center and its host, the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Chamber's 1600+ business members. D. Business training programs (in finance, marketing and management) designed specifically for the development needs of business owners and managers. Particiaation Proposal to Roanoke Countv: A $5,000 allocation to the Small Business Development Center for budget year 1995/96 to be used to assist small businesses in Roanoke County. -------------------------------------------------------------- Tommy Hubbard HUBBARD SERVICE DEPARTMENT Corner Cove & Peters Creek Road Roanoke, VA 24019 562-1600 SBDC Services Provided Business Planning Financial Options Evaluation Assistance with Business Financial Projections Loan Proposal Preparation Performance Bond Research and Assistance Hubbard Service Department became an SBDC client in July 1990. SBDC provided loan proposal assistance for successful business financing package. Continuing as a client in 1991, the SBDC provided key assistance in helping the client quickly obtain a required performance bond on a contracting bid he had been awarded. J. Richard Wells LEISURE PUBLISHING 3424 Brambleton Ave. Roanoke, VA 24018 989-6138 SBDC Services Provided Business Planning Market Research Strategic Market Planning Financial Analysis Business Financial Projections Business Research on a Negotiation Issue Business Research on a Personnel Management Issue Student Consulting Project Leisure Publishing became a client in August 1990. The SBDC has provided information and assistance on the above topics over the past two years. SBDC recommended and participated in a weekend strategic planning session for client's managers. In January 1993 the SBDC was successful in arranging for this client a graduate level student consulting project at no charge through Radford University. Terry Stevens PLUS COMICS 5207 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 774-5633 SBDC Services Provided Loan Proposal Development Financial Projections Assistance in Obtaining Working Capital Loan Plus Comics became an SBDC client in Janaury 1995. The company's request for an expansion working capital loan had been declined by several banks. The SBDC worked extensively with Plus Comics in developing an effective loan proposal which proved successful with First Union National Bank. Plus Comics now has the working capital to grow its business and create one or two new jobs within the next year. Phillip R. Meador WEBB'S OIL CORPORATION 8223 Reservoir Road Roanoke, VA 24019 362-3795 SBDC Services Provided Fueling Site Marketing Study Radford University Student Consulting Project Webb's Oil Corporation became an SBDC client in July 1993. In a program to expand their business, Webb's was researching sites for commercial fueling stations. The SBDC matched Webb's with a student consulting project at Radford University. The consulting team consisted of four students, the SBDC Director and two Radford University professors. The project consisted of planning, research, data collection, analysis and recommendarions. Bruce Cody ARCHITECTURAL WOOD 6525 Commonwealth Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 989-1040 SBDC Services Provided Financial Statement Analysis Gross profit Analysis Marketing Strategies Pricing Strategies Architectural Wood became an SBDC client in Janaury 1995, seeking assistance in marketing and f financial areas. The company had successfully grown to its current level and was making plans for its next phases of expansion. The SBDC conducted an extensive analysis of the company's financial performance and marketing programs and made recommendations for purposes of future growth. George Ferguson WHITE HOUSE GALLERIES 4347 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24018 774-3529 SBDC Services Provided Business Planning Assistance Loan Proposal Development Business Acquisition Assistance Assistance with Obtaining Business Loan George Ferguson became an SBDC client in September 1994 through his realtor at Owens & Co. George had worked at White House Galleries for 27 years. As the owners was retiring, George desired to acquire the business. The SBDC worked extensively with George in the development of financial projections, development of a loan proposal and the successful structuring of the financial acquisition of the business. ~i/ L •~ ~ ~ ~- ~ cn ~' ~ 3 ~ m ~_ . O z ~ ~ tC ~ = O ~ Q L ~ ~ L ~ N fll~ rn ~ •c ~ ~ C -p Q U ~ i c~ U ~ Q ~ o ~ °' ~ ~ .~~~ X N E c ~ ~ 0 o ~ }, ~ o ~ ~ ~ m m o ~ J t -- y Y ~ ~ d ~ C y O U m V ~ ~ y ~ d d O L O _ y G > O d O d ~ y r V y z Em d 'E 1.~ O dv ~ > N ~ V~~ c = o m p Q O ~ i i i O V t4 y d y y (~ LL ~; +: H W ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ V ~ o ~ ca 'y _ ~ a HV m d ca ~ m V _ . ~ °> £ N ~ L LOtiZ do `a~oueoa •M•S `~aa~~S lsai~ O GE ~aq~~u~~~ol~a~ ~.. a~, C • m N o c O ~° z O ~Q LL . //Q~~~ V d d O U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 C O = C L O ~~ E , ~ ~ U ~ O U m ~ ~ U p ~ ~ O = L L G1 41 ~ L ~ Q~ p ~ N C N ~ E ~ d V ~ ~ ~ tC L ~ c • ~ _ C L m N ''' ~ ~ d :~ ~ v ~ •~, ~ 7 _3 m ~ ~ O C G N D O a +~ a Q N ~ ~ G .C N .G = a v ~~ , t ~ d d ~ ~ o .3 ~ V W - m Y ~ •~ O _~ U ~ H ~ 0 d .-~ V N "' O T N C "~ - "O Y d c -- O 7-~ L O O O tq f0 ip Ch N T pN fC .L.. C m ~ p F- id ai y O pUj 'O ~ m C ~ N C O N c0 ~ N ~. .N 4 (0 d .O lC ~ .- 'O L O. O C Vl p_ p _7 (!) E p~ p X N C "O 'O H f~ O C X N -O v d L 07 C d C y n N c U N N d~ y N "'~ C C U fA Q N N U V~ j C 0 N _ O N ._ mL.. o d~~ N O c N~ O 3 m L U co Ya• XocoVZEc'"NdvLm"Z .o c m o ~ n.c ~ ~ ~ m~Q-y ~~ ~w nF- ~ N ~' C O T '«O- N~ Q N N m U O C O V~ 0 C C ~- N Q a p y rn c ~ c ~ "- ~ -~ ~ ~ voi .~ ~ .~ c N o N~ d~~ N~ N "O ~ v U N ai N~ N~ -~ ~> m~ p O C ~ 41 E d N (` -_ U O N T ~a L Q a 0 N N N f0 ~~ C 'C ~ r L N ~ C ~ NQ o a~ mmUUia~ N '-~v mm c _ L U m m ~ O CO T N 'O N j j C C N N C ~ O 'n C N C N~ (0 (~ O~ .~ L N d E d~ N Q O_ N E O 7 U y -O ~'O .U 0) tq N .i.. fn O V- N O N 4 4~ N y ~ C N C ri N Lew o~ aUi~°~co ~ ° °-~c ° ~ ~NnL' H~ o U a c OC ~ o rn ~ E a~ co I m o _ _ ~ i i~ r~ • • I^ vJ I~~ V1r~ O V,~ C/~ •fl v~ M ~ ~ 4~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ aA a~ ~ .~ .~ ~A ,~ .~~ °~~ a ~ a~ :' a ~~ CCU A~A, ~i/ 4~ ~ a a'° ~ o •~ ~ ~ a .~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~U ALA'' ~V '~ U V L a~ ~, .~" ..r 0 ~, a, W W r N C '~.a~ ° s .d~ p o . • ~~ af'a ~ m W da v ~ I•.O~V Z O ~ ~ Y •~ s~mdc~ V1 W F a •a .~ 1~1 A N U • .~ ~ ~ O ~ (-~ ~ ~ ~ N U y~"j • C W .a a ~ w ~ U g ~ ~ ~ U ~ .~ o •~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~q •~ cd ~ ~ ~ f-Yi ~ PQ a ~ •~> ~~ ~U ~ ~ Q~ A~ UE~-' ~ H A o • • • • ~. .~ •°a ~a F d zW ~x O U E.., x H O ~ bA bA U • c~ .4: ~ , ~ A U ~ .~ N,Gy ~ Q .~ ~ ~ w o ,~ ~ ~ A bn ~ ~ 3 .Q ~ v~ on ,~ U .~ ~ a~ ~ O ~ ~ o ~ ~ y.,, o>„ ~ ~ ~ ~ aro ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ .~ ~ ~.~ o o Q ~ .~.n ~ ~ .~ PA `'" ~~~ ~ ~ U ~ ~Mq ~ ~ ~~~ N . a~ b ~ ,-. C/] M M ~ ~.+ O - ~ o~~;v~ G va ~ O A~, OE"w ~ ~ H ~sq~ ~~~•~~~ - ~~,~ 8 % ~• ~~a ~ Qo ,4 •a q w~+~~rw O ~. T•~ O pip O U .7 `' a ~ ~ Q la ~ ~ ~ U K N y~ ~~~~~~~ Q~~ Public Safety Measures That Are Most Likely To Reduce Crime Strengthening and supporting family stability Jobs and targeted economic development qg,4% More police officers 39.8% After-school programs 33.0% Neighborhood Watch programs 33.OP/o More police foot patrols 322% School-to-Work programs 31.2% More recreational programs 3pr4% Early childhood education (e.g. Head Start) 29.8% Reintroducing punishment into schools i 8.i% .Mandatory sentencing 17.8% Conflict resolution programs 17..0% • ~ Court/bail reform I6.8% funding of drug treatment i4.9% Boot Camps 13.]% Citizens reporting crime i z0Q/o Gun control i i.8% Elimination of parole q,q% Building more prisons g14% More death penalties 8.1% 63.6% -._--, ti,~~ ~. _- Public Safe Measures That Are Most f`Y Likely To Reduce Grime Strengthening and supporting family stability Jobs and targeted economic development More police officers After-school programs Neighborhood Wafich programs More police foot patrols School-fo-Work programs More recreational programs Early childhood education (e.g. Nead Start) Reintroducing punishment into schools ~ g.1% .Mandatory sentencing 17.8% Conflict resolution programs 17.pp/° • ~ Court/bail reform i 6.8% Funding of drug treatment 14.9% Boot Camps 13.1% Citizens reporting crime ~ 2,0% Gun control i 1.8% Elimination of parole 9.9% Building more prisons gr4% More death penalties 8.]% 63.6% 48x4% 39.8% 33.0% 33.0% 322% 31.2% 30x4% 29.8% S. w S / ~ _ ~© y ~. i ~ 1 4,.-, ~ ~_ IIIif ~ ~a~'~e ~~ee ~l~~t« TWENTY YEARS OF SERVICE . {people Working for Worl~i~g {people, , BOARD OF DIRECTORS John M. Garvin, M.D President Regine N. Archer vice President For the calendar. year 1.994, the Bradley Free Clinic provided J. Michael Williams Treasurer services valued at $971,483. The percentage of patients seen from Jacquelyn T. Carmack Secretary Roanoke County annually is 15%. Estelle K. Nichols Executive Director James W. Harkness Member-at-large 111 1994, Roanoke County residents received $145,722 In free G. Steven Agee A. Scott Anderson, III, D.D.S. dental and pharmacy services. medical Robert L. Ashcraft , Winifred C. Ballenger Frances B. Brown Wesley D. Gillock K. LeGree Hallman, M.D. The ServlCeS rovided include: h Thomas J. Harvey, R.Ph. Kevin C. Kelleher, M.D. Suzy Lawrence Curtis E. Mllls, Jr. medical treatment _& diagnOS1S David Newman, R.Ph. Rusell D. O'Conner, R.Ph. lab Work Thomas T. Palmer - R. Coleman "Sam" Keid x-rays Randall R. Rhea, M.D. free referrals to specialists George T. Richardson, D.D.S. , Sue Ellen Rocovich, Ph:D., D.o. cancer screening Douglas R. Ross, D.D.S.' A. Morris Turner, Jr. psychiatric consultations Mary Ella Zelenik, M.D. ~ dental services ADV1soRY COMMITTEE free referrals'to oral surgeons Henry B. Bell Robert F. Bondurant, M.D. medications (drugs continue to be our most critical challenge John A. Burkart, Ph.D. Walter M. Dixon, Jr. due to high cost of drugs} Judge Beverly T. Fitzpatrick Heman A. Marshall, III Walter Rugaber Rosalie K. Shaftman Victor S. Skaff, D.D.s. We appreciate Roanoke County's on-going financial Barbaia surrusc°, R.N. commitment of $6,500. Robert Van Kerckhove, M.S. Carol A. Wood 1240 Third Street S.W. • Roanoke Vir inia 24016 A united way A9en~y (703344-5156 Fax: (703)342 0220 i~~ ^ -~ < ~ D r C m ~ O 0° ~ O fTl < ~ n °o ~ N ~ ~ fTl D ~ ~ .p fTl ~ X pp -O ~ r~ z D --1 ~ C ~ ~ ~ rn 0 N lD lD -{~ DOLLARS (Millions) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O -~ N W -P CJ1 ~ ~! Oo ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D C O CIS ~ ~ D r ° C r*~ _ --< m r~ (~ n r Z_ C7 G TI I i O X D Z O m ~ G D r r- - I"i'1 C ~l wp ~.~v.~~.~< °w a~ ~ ~~.~ ~ 3 ~ c o° ~ _ .+= ~ . ° ~v, w ° CD~•~m m~D-o N° ~ ~~~'~°w ~ aw~ °~ o °~`< ~~~ cODao ~ ~ ai ~ ~' ~ ~ a a Z• ~ CD ~ ai v w ~ . ~ o ~° ~. ~ co m ~. ~ C w am~° w N ~ ~~ c o ° c a w O m ~' ~ ~• m ~ ~ ~ ?:m a~ ~ ~ .~ ~o Q o , w ~ ~m w ~~ a~D c . (/~ Q ~,~Q~Q ~ Q~ m ~ ~. o ~~~w~~ ao c• ° ~' m m m ~.a w~ o ~ o ° ~~.w ~m ..«~.D ~ ~ a~ aQn~ ° j ~ ~ ~• ~, O p~ C Cn. •p O O ~ o w~xw~~ mwm ~ c-omco w o-WDo ~o ~~~~DO~~~~o~ m~ o• ~~ o p ~Op ~. c p s °~~~ ° ~ ~QC~~aw ~ ~ ~o'~ ~ ~w°ccomQ~Q~r~o ~ m _. ~. o ? ~.~ m•o~ ~ w w ai ,~ < ca c~ Q- ~ w a-p ~~ ° ~ D ~ cam W Q~ m~ ~° V Q v wa~`O ~ Q~r.o ~ ~ m snow-a,~oo°°w~. ° ~~' o w ~ o ° ~~ r: m ~~~ ° Q-~m_o-~. Caw ~ ~•wcn m ~ ~ (D S ..« ~D = (D ~ ~ ~ m`< c -yam ao m w p~Diao~n° w ~o ~~m~c°ir'~oo~m 0 3 o C~~•no m (SD ~ ~ (D °i 0 ~ Q fD `GS ~ `~cw~'Ow~~owQ~~a°~c -m .~~3~ ~ °'~ om°cnm?~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p -° ~ ~ a n ~D ~ ~ w n Q ai VG ~• N ID w O~ O `< w N mowaaj~mm~uwi°jmm~ ~~ a~ 3 ~~~~ Q Q o m o 0 m . ~ o ~ ~ m~~ '~ n•~ m ~ ~ o-a cn s m s~ ~o ~~ cnm ~ ~ o o m aw ~ c1u ~~'~~z~wQ~~w~o~~ m~ pn° °-~p~~'~mo, a~o~~DO~~~ow~~~~ N c S C ~ O c~`D 7 7 0 (Cn 7 COD S ~' m 3 m ~. ~~ m aam a m ~ Wpm ~ <C77o w w ~ ° < m ~ ='o ~ ~' ~ w ~ ~ 7om'w < m o m~.< •~ o o ~~ ~ o m p~ o c c c o ~Q o o ~, ~ cD w :. cg c w c C2 ~ 0 7 n O Q Q' 'a w c~ w w W N S O S c7. O S 7~ (D ~• fD ~ n• CD (~• O fD < n O O m ~N m w o ~' =~cD w= w w~ m w y ?•Qm ~ ....~ o °_.m s o -~ a ~ 3 C7 ,~ m m m n < Q. ~ cQ ~ csD ~ cn o . w ~, c ~ ~ ° w < n, o cn •o > > C m ~, w o ,~ •c cn z -moo `,~D~ ~' ° aa~ o o mcn ~' o-o a~ Z < <O m~ ~ ° a n~ m Q O o~ l o c o o~~? w ~ W~~ o ~ ?`~•~~~• Z1 w <'~ ~ ~' m a0i ~~ ~ a~i~Q~° n. ~ c w m can o ~ m c ~ Z ~~ m ~ ~ ~ ~•w o ~ °-o ~ w 3 ~ Q~ ~~ ~'w aw o ~ a ° a N D ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ p cn vOi m ~ cn m Rl '~ < m C7 ~ g C7 ° < m ~~< C m ,~ m ° w ~ ?'~:-o ao o c~ aw m ° ~ m'~n °-~~ 3~ o-o m c o ~ n° r« o m w o w cn m w ~ m ~ a .-„C°pw ~T1 .imp ~$~ cooc °~.. ~cn oc~o3 °'w ~ ~'~ ~' y°D~ c ~.~ ~c~n ~' o' ~~ ~'w ~ 3 ~~m ~•o ~ ~ m n~°,~ m o m m o ° 3 ~~ a ~' m m ~ .° O a< o O~ to a w~ ~° w O n w -~ -` -~ tT ~ a• - n w W ~ cn w ~ c ~ = ~< ° < a ° `~ ~ ~ N •m a w ~'. ~' v cn o m m m o~ °-' ~ n~ m o ... ~D <n ~ a ° ~ m~'~~wr:~~w~ ~ mn cn~o ~~ m~ m «~ ~ D Z 3 r~ n r ~ w Q m ~~ .-. - -°a m ~ m ~ m m °~" ~ w ~° ~ o a~ ~w a o m°w°~~~w ~ ~w °o~-a ~ ~ ~~ ~~in•w ~,~ °~ ~ ~~ W~.o ° ~~ o ~2~w ~~pW, DD .~ x ~m corn m ~ C ~ f<D Q- .O+ O n ~ O' < ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ Q `G Q (D N ASi lD tU N ~' ~ j ~ I Cep COp ~ (3D ~ (N,.1 O ~ ~ ~ upi in ~ ~ ~ ~ ,... ° m x w m ~ ~ to c n p 0 0 ~. °c o o~ o ~- o a ~ w° a o cn• ~ ~ ~, c ~ ° -a ° ~ m m ~ ° m n -a o~cn~~o~w~n ~ ~ ~~=o '~` ~ n fD c ~p -• C n Q N ~ ° O ~ O On < .O. ~ O p ~ ~ W o w m o~~~ w c m o m O O~~ c su ~D O cn O c cn ~ n i C2 i ~ _- i Q CD -~ N m m N 0 v m N .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ x a A ~' ~ f~~ a 0 G a .~ _o °' ° o ~ a ~- ° .~ ~, :~ . ~,~~.~ ~50~ ~a~~~~ ~.~~~~~ ~ ~° 3 a ~ 3 ~~~ ~~ ~ •o o ~ ~ 'S ~ ~, ~~,~~~~ ~o.~~~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~', g ~ ~' x W g ~ ~ ~ U `~ 8 x ~w AO ~z H~ Qo ~ o W o ~z p ~~ 18S-1/per •S n a ~ 0 ~~ `~ °d"oswu~ ~ ~ O~ O Y w ~ '~~ ~ ~ 7SNOSa3ii3P 7 ~ ~~ ~is aas a a ~ Q W Z f ,~' „~ ~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ :~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~g ~ ~~ V1V~ ~plf') ~ ~ ~ ~~ x ~ 8~ ~~ ~ ~ o z ~ ~-~ o o ~Z O M f~ O/ m ~. ~un~cH on the LAW N LOAArea Agency on Aging Requests the P~easure of Your Company for ,\ BUNCH ON THE ZAl~N .I~ric~ay, June 9 • 11:00 a.m. to 1:30,p.m. 706 Cam~~ie~~Ave, S~ I~oano~ee Gourmet Chie~en Sa~ac~, Fresh Seasona~Fruit, Potato Sa~ac~, Pound Ca~e, T~Zan~Z You Mint anc~ a Beverage served in a Souvenir Cup Eat In Pied-up (11 a. m.-1:30 p.in.) Free De~ivery Tic~eets are ,~`IO 100% of each tic~et wi~~ purchase one wee~Z of Mews-on-~hee~s for one person. Entertainment wi~~ ~ie provic~ec~ by Terry Foss anc~ Howard Nas~ Lunch on the Lawn wi~~~ie he~c~ rain or shine. LUNCH ON THE LA[X~IV RESERVATION FORM Pease send me tickets at X10 each, Totaj encjosecj Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Daytime Phone: D I'll join you at LOA. on June y. ~ free De~ivery (2 mea~ minimum pease) De~iver to: Between anc~ O Pick-u p (11 a. m. -1:30 p. m.) ^ I cannot attend but would like to support Mews-on-[~heejs, Encjosecl is my eh¢ck for Make Checks payable to I,unelz on tlZe Lawn anc~ ,cencl to: IOA Area Agency on Aging. P.O. Box 14205; Roanoke, VA 24038. Por more information ca11345--0451. ~noh.a-~ ~o-~a-c n ~[~.t ~.hc~LGC.t.c.~-~ ~~ t c.c-~r~ !~-cz~ o~e~~n..c.~ c.J ~h~ ~: >~ ~ ~R,O~A~Np~~~ ~~~ t,«A~ z ~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401 8-0798 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE FAX (703) 772-21 93 H. OOELL -FUZZY- MINNIX, CHAIRMAN (703) 772-2004 M E M O R A N D U M CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KO HIN KE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY TO: Elmer Hodge / , WIN OSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT / _' BOB L. JOHNSON ~I ,~ ~ HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~t~~7%~ FROM: Harry C . Nickens / ~ VIN TO.`! MAG STERIA LSD STRICT DATE: April 24, 1995 (703) 772-2005 SUBJECT: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 5 ORDINANCE TO REZONE 68.4 ACRES WITHIN THE FALLING CREEK SUBDIVISION FROM AG 3 TO AR Concern is being raised with the rezoning of the referenced property because of the potential impact that this rezoning might have on the Blue Ridge Parkway. I expressed publicly in the County Board Meetings and privately to staff my concern that a developer might have unrealistic restrictions placed on property under the guise of protecting the Blue Ridge Parkway. Since I live closer to the Blue Ridge Parkway than any other Board member, I daily experience the positive aspects of this national park. Obviously, it is a treasure that merits protection. However, the property in question will be developed only below the ridgeline and will therefore not impact in any way the Blue Ridge Parkway. With regard to the Musselwhite project, that project was not included within the 11 viewsheds alluded to in the staff's report under "County Administrator Comments". The Musselwhite project was subjected to review by the Blue Ridge Parkway in order to gain access to sewer. Otherwise, they would have built the subdivision without any involvement of the Parkway. It concerns me that the Ferguson property is even brought into question relative to protection of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Access to this property will be directly in front of my home, will not be a part of the Blue Ridge Parkway viewsheds, and will, in my opinion, not adversely affect the Parkway in any way. The only impact that I see is for cars traveling in front of my and my neighbors' homes. I would be pleased to discuss this at the April 25th Board Meeting or defer it if staff sees the opportunity for a rethinking of their views prior to its coming up for a second reading. I would appreciate also an elaboration on the staff's statement of "non-conformance" within the staff report. HCN/bjh cc: Members, Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney Terry Harrington ®Rpy~ OF EiOANp,F~ G ~ A Z L7 z °v a 7838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD April 27, 1995 Dear Sam: C~~~x~t~ a# ~.a~x~o~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Let me add my personal thanks for presenting the invocation for the Board Meeting last Tuesday. I am sorry that I was unable to "visit" with you more but since this was my meeting, I was involved in getting together the speaker requests for the Budget Work Session at 4 p.m. I do hope that you are enjoying your "retirement" although I suspect you still keep very busy! It was nice to see you again, and look forward to the next time you join us. Thanks again, ® Recycled Paper O~ ROANp~~ ti 9 z ~ c~ ~ 2 J a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 Apri126, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR r;ILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTOf`% MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Reverend Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3071 Ordway Drive, Apf E Roanoke, VA 24017 Dear Reverend Crews: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, Apri125, 1995. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. With kindest regards, ~~ ~ ~ H. Odell "Fuzz ' Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~~ ~ ~ / ~~ x X~ C~.vixrtt~ o~£ ~a~xx~~~e ® Recyded Paper Elmer Fuzzy: As you know we will be having the cultural and human service agencies at the next Board meeting. Brent Robertson has been telling them that they will have from 3 to 5 minutes to make their presentations. Ken Schutz from the Science Museum called. He has a 10 minutes video that he would like to present. I told him I doubted if you all would want to allow each organization 10 minutes (there are usually about 20 organizations), but I told him I would check with each of you. My suggestion is that he make an oral presentation and leave the video so the Board members can see it individually on our TV. What do you think? I told him I'd call him back. a '~ 3 ~ ~u ~ Z~ ` 5c~ icQ /~ D - ~ r' ~ v i d e Mary Allen ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~D G~ ~~~, 4/18/95 -~ r ~cZ ~ ear /i ecc~ ~~~ LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Alliance Properties Inc. to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C-1 and C-2 conditional to C- 2 to construct a supermarket and drug store, located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 6, 1995 ~.~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 11, 1995 Tuesday, April 18, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Alliance Properties Inc. c/o James Douthat PO Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7662 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ~\/(V~~j M ~ ® r+BR/~7 D ~~ a !' v NWEALTI~ of VIRGINIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET DAVID R. GEHR RICHMOND, 23219-1939 COMMISSIONER January 12, 1995 Mr. H. O'Dell AAinnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Reference: Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways Dear Members of the Governing Body: ~~ JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER On December 1, 1994, this office implemented a new procedure that allows us to accelerate acceptance of new street additions by nearly two months. Under old, °first-in first-ouY' procedures, street acceptances were delayed as earlier requests were reviewed and processed in detail. This new procedure avoids that delay by accepting new street additions based on a preliminary audit. We will still conduct a detailed audit of changes to the system as they are coordinated with other Department offices, doing so after official acceptance. The enclosed report presents all changes made to the secondary system, within your jurisdiction, during 1994. Future notices of such changes will follow this format, but will reflect only changes made during the previous month. If you have any questions regarding this material, please call this office at (804) 786- 2746 or your local residency office. Sincerely yours, James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer cc: District Administrator Resident Engineer w. copy of report TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 4/10/95 AC MH RE: Acknowledgments of roads taken into the state system to be placed on April 25 agenda Before these acknowledgements were put under Consent Agenda, but we think that they could go under Reports since this is informational only. We would appreciate whoever receives the copy of the acknowledge report giving us a copy so we can place it on the agenda. Thanks. Brenda ~/,~F ,C~ ~~ ~ . ~t ~:. M ~~ K ~ ~, '~ ~ ~N •'khA i'(N'~ , C®Mli~®1®T`V~~I,TH of V~R~~N~A DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER Memorandum To: Reference: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER January 1~ ~"~ 0 N (I~ L`~ >, District Administrators Resident Engineers Changes to the Secondary System On December 1, 1994, this office impleme acceptance of new street additions, and other ch. months. Under old, "first-in first-ouY procedures; requests were reviewed and processed in detail. accepting new street additions based on a prelim audit of changes to the system as they are word so after official acceptance. II accelerate gym, by nearly two ayed as earlier hat delay by uct a detailed offices, doing The enclosed form letter was used to report this change in procedure to the various local governments and to report all changes made to the secondary system, within each jurisdiction, during 1994. Future notices of such changes will follow this format, but will reflect only changes made during the previous month. Because of this accelerated process, it becomes increasingly important for personnel involved with changes to the system to exercise an even higher degree of care in the preparation of addition assemblies, particulariy in regard to addition description termini. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed material, please contact this office. j (kN+ei lam, ~ (~~'BP-tri~ f!`~ U ~' ,y For James S. Givens State Se dary Roads Engineer _.P~-- Kenneth M. Smith Transportation Engineering Program Supervisor (786-2576) EnGosure - For District Offices, 1994 Summary Report of System Changes, District wide For Residency Offices, 1994 Summary Report of System Changes, Pertinent Localities TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY > P ~ U P P ~; P P P P Q P P O' a+ \ \ \ \ P _ d M O M M M \ \ ~ ~ ti A ~ w \ M \ \ \ ~t .T \ O \ O ~ r \ M r r r N N f~ 1~ r r O' W O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ O N N O N ~ ~ r r N d O O O O O O O O O O O O W W S d yJ V N d M N V V M ~ ~ t t O V L L L L L •'' +' +' " ~ 7 O L L 7 7 7 y d L O L O N d Y CC O O O O O O 3 Z 2 = ~ 2 2 N O N N y 0 ~ d d N d P d 3 = f/1 d d d N N N d N r P 1 ~.. r ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- • • • a E E E ~ ~ E ~ E E E E~ E~ E E O d d ~ a+ t0 ~' O O P +~ ++ O ++ N 00 •O CO ~T •O +' N +, P + M N 7 ~- 7 .- •O 7 ~ 7 7 ~ •O CO O N N N d 7 O N 7 O O 7 O O O ~ O O O OC O ~ O O 1' ~ O ~ O ~ O O ~ O OC O ~ O OC O OC a V O N 3 N L d O L a+ _ S ~' O d E O Z O N N N O N M W P N M M ... M r r ~ ti r r r N E o v- d d d d d w a+ d v d d d O • V N V N V V / N a+ N 7 a+ 7 V 7 V 7 V 7 V 7 7 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 O O O O O O E ~p dl Y dl O OC O GC oC OC oC C ~ O 1' C CC C d' L M O N a ~ V1 N L y L ~ ,Q E ~- l0 J 2 W d / ~ P P P N N 00 00 N N N •+ ~' ~O .t ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ r~ E W ~+ L L Y ~~ pp y N L > O 7 ~' • M Qy1 ~ O C ~ W W E L ( j •C Z N y ~ ~ o W • V C 'O 'p L ~ L O - p U ~ C J OC ~ O O O O C C Cl d U d d d 3 3 U ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ N C C C ~- ~ L C W ,~' O a+ L ( 7 W O N ~ O G ~ T N . ~ ~ 'O Y f L ~ X X d U L L ~ •1p •~ O d d O O d v a ~ x s c~ yr ~ r- ~ ~ a ti ~ ~ ~ +, N a+ N a+ Vi u Q u Q J ~ ~ Z ~ L J ~ L L 3 3 > ~ O O O W d x x ~ ••- S S ~ ~ LL ~ S L N N m ~ ~ C p~ a + C C _ C • ^^ • H ~ ~ L L L ~ V _Q I . • . F~ ~ 7 C J 7 L m Q W w LL W W O ~ O U O f.7 V S x S S S d G N L V C O Y / N to 4 pP P M /C ~ a 7 d ~ . O Y 10 U C C W N O ~ l N > pJp.. ~ppT.. ~ppT.. s P P .T P ~T P ~t P .t P O. O. O. ~+ \ d ~O •O •O N Vl 1!1 1/1 1!1 w w \ N \ N \ N \ N \ \ \ \ W r r r r N N N N O N O I A P 00 ~O M ~ W N ~t N O y O O O O O O O O .t O d S a+ V W N N ~+ d L L 1 ~ ? j ~ 7 N d L L O O N H ~O f~ O O O N W 3 d 00 N N d M N W N Z O N N ~ N E~ E ~ E E E E P ++ ~ ~+ ~ +-' ~O +' ~n P M ~O P o0 P O O O O O~ N IA ~ O~ O GC d' d' O CC O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ N T d t O O V OC N x W L W L ~ a + L O O O O O P P LL Z ~ V N N N N O O y E ~ .- o v- a+ ar a+ d w d w ° o P 7 ~ 7 a+ 7 ~ 7 7 v i ~ ~ O ~ ~ o o ~ ~ z o o C n c o c QL V a >. N N L N T L L i- f0 ~ Z W O U V In ~t h ~ f~ P ^ ~ 41 C O O N N N P CO P P Q I ~ ~ '- ~ ~ .- .- ~-- E N V L L V a o +• v Q! V L L N ~ ~ > > U W ~ C Z ~ Y d V U ~ ~ • O O O O 7 • O) t V OC W 00 > O U L U J Q U d d 1+ L y A ~ ~ O O O V ~+ C ~ ^ ~ -p C +' C ~ N d N A J •J 1 ~ as L N 10 O L L E lp Q m J ~ m O O N t/1 W d p~ 0 d N N d p. Q1 E a + N ~ 'D 'O ~ 10 W L L L L 2 N N f0 N d (7 C7 (7 C7 > d d d J O O O O Ol OI 07 •~ ••- •~ •^ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ W {n L L L J V V V V V ~+ V C C C C C C C _ c0 /0 f0 N 7 7 7 N a x x x S a a a w c m L U C O E N •N •+ N N Q er p . P V M 4! ~ L a U Y C 7 C ~ ~ O o[ ~' M E M O RAN D U M To: Board of Supervisors From: Elmer C. Hodge Date: April 13, 1995 Subject: Meetings re Route 221 Improvements Your meeting with VDOT at 2 p.m. on April 25 has been confirmed. Its purpose is to review the progress and plans for improvements to Route 221. There are several other dates that you may want to put on your calendars as well. VDOT will conduct an informational meeting for the public on April 27 at the Cave Spring Junior High School. The meeting will begin at 5 p.m., with comments and program being presented at 7 p.m. Two public hearings for citizen input have been scheduled by VDOT. The first will be held on May 24 at Cave Spring Junior High, the second on May 25 at Back Creek Elementary. Both begin at 4:00 and end at 8:00. On this schedule, the project will be brought to you sometime the latter part of June or July. If you have any questions, please call me. ECH/meh cc - Ms. Mary H. Allen Mr. O. Arnold Covey Ms. Anne Marie Green Mr. Paul M. Mahoney Item No. -~ - L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 2~, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance declaring a portion of parcel of real estate (Public Service Center) identified as Tax Map No. 36.031-1 consisting of .06 acre located off Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81 to be surplus and accepting/rejecting offer for sale of same. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Virginia Department of Transportation is acquiring additional right of way for the expansion of I-81 in Roanoke County. One of the parcels of land needed for this expansion is owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: The Kessler Mill facility is adjacent to I-81. A .06 acre portion of this property is needed by VDOT to expand the right of way on I-81. This .06 acres is outside of the existing fence and will not affect operations at Kessler Mill. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,000 offer by VDOT-equates to $17,000 per acre-all costs and expenses paid by VDOT. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Department of Highways is acquiring land necessary to expand I-81 in Roanoke County. One of these parcels is owned by Roanoke County at the Kessler Mill facility and is .06 acres in area. This land is outside of the existing fence at Kessler Mill and is not part of any expansion plans. The Engineering and Economic Development Departments were advised of this purchase offer and have no difficulties with the sale of this property. Sale of the .06 acres will not affect present or known future operations or programs. All expenses connected with the sale of this parcel would be paid by VDOT. ALTERNATIVES: 1. 2. 3. Accept the VDOT offer Decline the VDOT offer Re-negotiate the purchase amount STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff reccomends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to convey a .06 acre parcel to the Virginia Department Of Transportation following a second reading on May 9, 1995. Respectfully submitted: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator /~"~ ~ P.O.C. ttiu. u e. ,.' ~°~kp, P.I. Sta. 10+00 Rte. 6'3~ • \ ° Sur. ~ c• L°~ ~~' ~ ~c.~' ~.~~ A- 8 5'00'00" Lt ~ o.~. \' a.'1`° A4~~ T~ 238.645 ` ~~d9' ~ \ ~p.Q?6'1~0 Pa ~c~~~k~• L-386.36 ~ .~ol.°~sl i •• <? ~0~• \\ R' 2 60.435 ~° ~~~1 \ taQ g'~P' PC.-14+32,09 1,5 e~5 0~ P.I,•'I6+7Q 73 X5'1° OGonst. ~~ P, R.C.` 18+18,45 p-80.19' Ofn" Lt. ~ ~ / ~~ T ~ D-IZ.Ot~61' ;; .~ * X25 AGE a t_-470.4L' ;. v ~ ~~Rp'ONCC.O Q~Q R=D~5.58' J •(~ ECG` c,~' ® P.G.ID+77.55 `_0. ®' ~0 ~e~ ~ THOMAS RUSSRLL CD.,INC. tia P.R.C.18+,47.97 ' .'~ ® ~'ao ~ QQ 474 PG.375 \ 9o V•~5 M.P.N. ~ ' ~ "~\''- <~ 6.39 Ac. ,~ ~C\0 ~ ~ \ <•f, Ls' 80 ~_ ~~ p~• ~0 •e ~ F c~. P Q~, ARE p.~ - ,~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~~,e~ o ~~ ,.. X ~`r3 T ,~. =CL \ E R \ \ ~ ~ `'-'~i= x;300 ~`~3 ~ F~ i i ION \ \'•~. • • . \\®®\ - ~~,5~~ L9~ " ~ ~''l~ , ' e~C ios 115 `\ •.t ~~ . /'~2\~. I L9J ~~ ,~~j l7~ % ~~9, I~H; N~'0~ \ ~` ~ ~ V 9 C / ~ ~Fl-N93r ~ etrla \\ •~ • ! s~`~ ~ ~6 ~® ~~ ~ i r SIT ~dJ ~ / _ _ 0 •\ ~ ~~ '10~p5, ~N~N2~•i r ~ ~ .~- ~ TIC CABLE Tom'. \ ~~ ~s~ . ~P~ ~A~ j ~ . -FIBER ~.R~tIIAV• OO \~ L~' ~ . ,,;r-: i Lad ., ~All~ ~5A0~ ,;~ ,•.~^:•• •,D~uln~ a ~~ ''"_ ...._---•- J • ~' ~~ •Q: ''~ ILL G.A \ti~ o~vl ~ \~~ ~ _ ~ ~ / pl-~CN -~0 6E o G.A. - ~ ~ _~ R. R` 9 • o \ ~. 1 `' ~ , / / 10' ~~ ~° ~~ i~ ~~Q~ e o°~ / % D° ~kaL ~ ~~5 5l I rx i i b ~ ~ / D. Q~i ~` ~• iV W~ / ~ y N• ~+~" ~,(i ~DEI O 1 :1 ~ ~ .r+ / ~ \\~~~~~ ~'• ® 11118 / ~~~ ® 1 'yam ~o N ^ +~ / /e~'~~•"~~z~ ~, ® ~ THE STORAGE BINS INC:~,, ~ 0 3 ~ / / X01` 1 ~ ~ ~ J D. B. 1381 PG. ~l Z ~` ~ I d ~, ,~ ~~ ~~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ .~ so ~ o: ~' Q / o~Q9` ~ ~d r~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ r.P. V y `. ~~ N ~n p ~ ' Z l.~r¢ v~ ~y_ ~J.~~ ~j H O p~ I Q~ if w Item No. -~° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 2.~, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing conveyance of easements to Appalachian Power Company and Bell Atlantic extending along Benois Road and across a surplus well lot. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: VDOT is expanding the right of way on Benois Road in the Cave Spring District. In order to do so existing easements for APCO and C & P Telephone utilities must be relocated. One of the affected properties is on the surplus list of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Tax map no 87311-3-28. BACKGROUND: The Wheeler well lot 87.11-3-28 was abandoned and declared surplus. The widening of Benois Road will not affect the sale of the lot. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The offer to move the easement has been reviewed by Planning & Zoning and the utility of the well lot is not thought to be impacted. All costs and expenses in the relocation will be paid by VDOT, APCO and C & P. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements and Admin to sign contracts. 2. Deny the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance conveying utility easements following a second reading on May 9, 1995. Respectfully submitted: Approved: ''_ C ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ~ ~ boa ~ ~IN~A ~# I ~ I I ~ ~ \ \ RpgN~K O• ~ in ~ 1 I I N :' +' ~ Vw p, 8.1209 ~ o ~ x JJ I I o ( ~( a 36.03-1-I i o i~ *} `" I I o C »l 4, '\ ~, C'S-4i,1, Z O ~ ~B •' , AC•' 12C' ~ ~ ~ ~ I I i rTl r~ ' FF't'CFW ~ ~ , l'~'? ~ , \AL N BASELINE ° I I ~ ~ -~4U Q7,j ~ ~ G!y'° • ~y shy I 207.45.00 P.C~ L ~ qGV I O a C` ~O ~~B7q•2 FR ,y ../p ro0' cy~ I I ino ~ ~ ~, o r~ ro9' ~A~ECr For r ~~ 2 '~tio~F' , ~ ` MON ° ° • II I o_ ~ h ~ •5O ~ °p ~F( Air ~~~5 F R 165.24 m • ~ I Z o S ROP ~ ~ ~• PROF' rnr \; Np\'~'~CF A~ ~'E`CO,~ ~ ~ •6 ~a v r~~v b~~l II b~~ ~~, ~'~E-WiW •50 & LAUNE ~ OlF ~S ~~: r "= = ~ _ =F= _ 69 ~\.~~~0~' __.___~ u~ ~ - --- -- III II "~' J~J C~~ - - SON %{!ON ; \ ` ~ ~ I ~ _ ~ ASPHALT _ ORNE I z ~I ~ o Jr1$ - •93.50 T ~~TARY~$EW ~ MANNi7LE ~ \~lT Q B W G m> I ' J ~ _'~_'~'_~_ ' ~ '~~~_ nip /i ~ ~ ~- •6'' 414 jW M r ¢ I I /, _ ~ - -i SBL Cauf,CL ~` - -`~ -'~ ll EO'D. I H-601 2 . _ _Sur.CL - - - - ~- - `- ~2 GR-FOA-2 ~ Il __ ___ ---_= _ ---_•-~----------------' I -- ---3 -TT-- - - - --,--~-a-~-=--e-->--~--~ - - - - - - - - - - ~r 'QED Sys R ~DRNL TERRY/N,4L ST'G.GR-8 REO'D. ~ N I N Coy R- 2 T!:NS EC STONE I I f Se ______~_______________r._______= N I I _ _ 'd e~ REao - - ~~iii ji =iii ! - - - - - - - ~ _ - -----------~------- ONC. I NBL Covuf. CL- - - -/ • V ALU A7101 ' i .-e-~-~------- T-- ---- -- --~ 0 _ B-- ~ - ~~~ z-=~~---o-' %' , N'7g~,~~~ j - ~/ ~ ~-~--,.-%•--.,-=~ 4`% 2 GR-FOA-211 I E Ir E -, _ ~I oll~ 'i ~~~ ; 4% ~'~~ 580 7 J jr'~ --- ~-r-~`_ - ~ ~ ~ T ---- ~' SANR~11'6`~~ I I - ------ ` ` ~ ~ _ ~ ~a %~ ~pPH• 1088.06 r ~ ~ WATER I ~I F C EX/ST.R/M' ~ ~ ~ b -._J IN/. 107953 ~ ~ MEtER II ~ I f ••, 1 ~ VAUU •pg h~ ~ ~ 4, REGULAT R I Y I CLOYp ~ :. W I R~'A/p/y 'u• H/iyCH ~.•4 u,~ EE ~ _~ PROP. 4w ~ " ~ ' ` ` ~ , _~ & D Q, H/~yCN ~ ~ ~ & tea r~NE ~ II ~v J OQ 6 ~~'G•528 EE PROP.FENCE _ m 123 T ~~ ® ~ _ qC: • OBS STD.FE-Wl,W2 - ER MN1H0 i ~ ,,,, SAN~~~f~4~ 118' ll8' 123' ~~ m ~` ~~ ••1079.0 •41 •4l •23 `D \1 O ~ ° II 62.5' TIM3ER RA/LRO 63 BRI AGE N0.1603 ~~ m ~9 I NBL EP ~8 I `~/ T 18' 43' Lt. I ' 02• I D I - -pIRT 1 '~~ ~-'R~~---'------- --- --------- ~ ~ 86707' rlOrl' •II _ ~_ 2912.661' ~ L~•03~ ~ ~I ' ~ NBL ConsF.CL - °~ °j ( I ~' d 42-r 03' U. ~_~`~ 51$~99.4a4 q,\ \ ~ ' ~ ~ 0 200' 00' P! yg~~.550 0 0 ~ T //04.9iB' P7 582• 151 ~ ~ ao F45' II~146'1 •J I „ ~ L • 21092r ~ ~ ' , a ~ ~ ~J ~ ~~5 J x _~ „~ R 286479' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~; Pc s7o•9631 P/ 582.0/28 }~ NORFOLK SOUTHERN 1~AILWAY ~ ~ ~ ~"'' ~ ~PT 592'0 /-~ VALUATION CENTEFtINE ~, 4,' ~ '~ I SEE VAL MAP V-!(I~VA/45 ~, ~ 185' m , ~ :~I I' o ' No L~Merllne 1/rOw 20p ~~~N BgsE~~ ~~ j IBS' Ar wldeNnp reQv/red -•00 pT 'I'E ~ ~ Q [!6~ V • 70 AIPH ~ - / ProtzPavemeN Wldenlnp ~,~ ~ ~ , r' Item No. ~-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A dwelling located on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Spring Hollow Reservoir is being vacated by present tenants as of April 30. Past practice has been to lease the property on order to help maintain the house and 10 acres surrounding it. A legal ad was placed in the Roanoke Times and World News giving public notice of the availability of the house for rental. Eight calls or applications were received and a list compiled in the order that they were taken. Both the general public and Roanoke County Employees responded to the advertisement. The first applicant, a County Employee, has agreed to the same terms as the previous lessors, and to increase annual rent to $425.00 per month. The references of this applicant have been contacted and his employment confirmed. FISCAL IMPACT: Rental payments will be paid into the Water Fund of the Utilities Department. No impact on the General Fund balance is anticipated. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A rental property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was advertised as available for occupancy. A suitable tenant from applicants has been selected and has agreed to lease terms upon Board approval. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the proposed lease 2. Deny the proposed lease 3. Direct Alternative uses for the property STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to lease 10.40 acres to Eurman V. Wiseman, following a second reading on May 9, 1995. Respectfully submitted: Motion by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Approved: ACTION Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A dwelling located on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Spring Hollow Reservoir is being vacated by present tenants as of April 30. Past practice has been to lease the property on order to help maintain the house and 10 acres surrounding it. A legal ad was placed in the Roanoke Times and World News giving public notice of the availability of the house for rental. Eight calls or applications were received and a list compiled in the order that they were taken. Both the general public and Roanoke County Employees responded to the advertisement. The first applicant, a County Employee, has agreed to the same terms as the previous lessors, and to increase annual rent to $425.00 per month. The references of this applicant have been contacted and his employment confirmed. FISCAL IMPACT: Rental payments will be paid into the Water Fund of the Utilities Department. No impact on the General Fund balance is anticipated. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A rental property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was advertised as available for occupancy. A suitable tenant from applicants has been selected and has agreed to lease terms upon Board approval. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the proposed lease 2. Deny the proposed lease 3. Direct Alternative uses for the property STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to lease 10.40 acres to Eurman V. Wiseman, following a second reading on May 9, 1995. r ~,A ~~.~ Item No. ~--~ ' -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995~~ L~~ AGENDA ITEM: va f Le - Ouse Sprin ollow Q.7 ~~ ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A dwelling located on property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at Spring Hollow Reservoir is being vacated by present tenants as of April 30. Past practice has been to lease the property on order to help maintain the house and 10 acres surrounding it. A legal ad was placed in the Roanoke Times and World News giving public notice of the availability of the house for rental. Eight calls or applications were received and a list compiled in the order that they were taken. Both the general public and Roanoke County Employees responded to the advertisement. The first applicant, a County Employee, has agreed to the same terms as the previous lessors, and to increase annual rent to $425.00 per month. The references of this applicant have been contacted and his employment confirmed. A copy of the proposed lease agreement and application are attached. Board approval of the lease is requested. FISCAL IMPACT: Rental payments will be paid into the Water Fund of the Utilities Department. No impact on the General Fund balance is anticipated. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A rental property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was advertised as available for occupancy. A suitable tenant from applicants has been selected and has agreed to lease terms upon Board approval. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the proposed lease ~J"" 2. Deny the proposed lease \5~ 3. Direct Alternative uses for the property ` ~\~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: pproval of al erna ive num e S~ ~ Respectfully submitted: Approved: .' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs i ., 1 Item No . ~-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, ~~ ~~ MEETING DATE: April ~, 1995 ~~ ~~ ~Q AGENDA ITEM: VDOT 'ght Wa Exp sion _1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Virginia Department of Transportation is acquiring additional right of way for the expansion of I-81 in Roanoke County. One of the parcels of land needed for this expansion is owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: The Kessler Mill facility is adjacent to I-81. A .06 acre portion of this property is needed by VDOT to expand the right of way on I-81. This .06 acres is outside of the existing fence and will not affect operations at Kessler Mill. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,000 offer by VDOT-equates to $17,000 per acre-all costs and expenses paid by VDOT. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Department of Highways is acquiring land necessary to expand I-81 in Roanoke County. One of these parcels is owned by Roanoke County at the Kessler Mill facility and is .06 acres in area. This land is outside of the existing fence at Kessler Mill and is not part of any expansion plans. The Engineering and Economic Development Departments were advised of this purchase offer and have no difficulties with the sale of this property. Sale of the .06 acres will not affect present or known future operations or programs. All expenses connected with the sale of this parcel would be paid by VDOT. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the VDOT offer I ~ ~~ 2. Decline the VDOT offer Ls 3. Re-negotiate the purchase amount `~1~.~ - 4~ .d STAFF RECOMMENDATION: p a ternative one. ~~ti ~ , Respectfully submitted: Approved: --- Elmer C. Hodge ~ County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens wpb 1 ~p~C~r~nt„~~`~~.~}~~Esi~U~J ~Al.~. v(~"~ . - ~- ~s. ORDINANCE DECLARING A PORTION OF A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE (PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER) IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 36.03-1-1 CONSISTING OF .06 ACRE LOCATED OFF KESSLER MILL ROAD AND INTERSTATE 81 TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses, namely, the expansion of Interstate 81, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on Apri125, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1995, concerning the disposition of a portion of the parcel of real estate, known as the Public Service Center, consisting of .06 acre, and identified on the Roanoke County Land Records as a portion of Tax Map No. 36.03-1-1 located at Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81 in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 3. That an offer for said property having been received, the offer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation to purchase this property for the sum of One Thousand Twenty ($1,020.00) Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. 4. That the purchase price for the property shall be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital improvements fund. 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authoried to execute such documents r Item No . •--~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: April ~~, 1995 S ~~ AGENDA ITEM: ~~FeTa ' on o y Eas ents ~"~.,~~ ~-h,e-~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: VDOT is expanding the right of way on Benois Road in the Cave Spring District. In order to do so existing easements for APCO and C & P Telephone utilities must be relocated. One of the affected properties is on the surplus list of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Tax map no 87311-3-28. BACKGROUND: The Wheeler well lot 87.11-3-28 was abandoned and declared surplus. The widening of Benois Road will not affect the sale of the lot. FISCAL IMPACT: None SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The offer to move the easement has been reviewed by Planning & Zoning and the utility of the well lot is not thought to be impacted. All costs and expenses in the relocation will be paid by VDOT, APCO and C & P. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements and Admin to sign contracts. 2. Deny the relocation of the APCO & C & P easements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept a Approved: ~~~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge ~t~ County Administrator t Respectfully submitted: :, ,~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENTS TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND BELL ATLANTIC E%TENDING ALONG BENOIS ROAD AND ACROSS A SIIRPLIIS WELL LOT OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) and Bell Atlantic have requested easements for the relocation of existing public utility easements across property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located along Benois Road, and known as the Wheeler well lot; and, WHEREAS, APCO Bell Atlantic require these easements as a result of a road widening project of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Transportation; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements will serve the interests of the public and are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1995. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company and Bell Atlantic for the provision of public utility 4/18/95 John Willey: Attached are the following: ~~ ~' ~~~~ 1. Board reports that Mary Allen talked to you about this morning that need additional information. (Need (a) new titles, (b) in summary of information mention that first reading will be held April 25, 1995, and second reading May 9, 1995, and (c) more defined staff recommendations. 2. New Titles from PMM a. Ordinance authorizing conveyance of easements to Appalachian Power, company and Bell Atlantic extending along Benois Road and across a surplus well lot. b. Ordinance declaring a portion of parcel of real estate (Public Service Center) identified as Tax Map No. 36.03- 1-1 consisting of .06 acre located off Kessler Mill Road and Interstate 81 to be surplus and accepting/rejecting offer for sale of same. c. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to (Name). 3. Suggest staff recommendations Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to (whatever) after second reading on May 9, 1995. Brenda* ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 23, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Frederick A. Mahone and Rebecca Fay Mahone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On June 17, 1986, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to exercise an option to acquire a 10.40-acre tract of real estate with improvements identified as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 73.00-1-6. This property was acquired for the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project for the purchase price of $95,400. John D. Willey currently leases the property but has given notice of his intention to terminate the lease pursuant to paragraph 3 of the lease agreement between the County and Mr. Willey. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Frederick A. and Rebecca Fay Mahone desire to lease the property from the County. Staff has determined a fair market value rental for the premises and has negotiated a lease agreement. It is in the County's best interests to lease this property to safeguard the valuable improvements thereon and to receive fair market value lease payments until such time as the County deems it necessary to utilize the property. , Any lease of County real estate must be accomplished by ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on April 9, 1991; the second reading will be held on April 23, 1991. w ALTERNATIVES AND FISCAL IMPACT: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease agreement on behalf of Roanoke County, which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. Revenue for the term of the lease will be $350 per month. 2. Do not lease the property at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease agreement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 4/ 6/95 9:48 a.m. MA John Willey called and said that he has two items for new business for April 11. He gave me the following titles and said he had talked with PMM and ECH about these. 1. Relocation of Utility Easement 2. VDOT Right of Way Acquisition ~~_ ~~u~' ~~~ ~ ~ Brenda ~~ ~~„~~~ ~ ..~~ N ~. ~ ~~ APRIL 25 BOARD MEETING 2:00 P.M. -WORK SESSION WITH VDOT -ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WORK SESSION ON BUDGET: HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES ATTEND TO MAKE REQUESTS (TENTATIVE -UNTIL HEAR FROM ECH OR BRENT) NEW BUSINESS -APPROVAL OF HEALTH CARE CONTRACT Budget Calendar FY 1995-96 2/14/95 Finalize vehicle inventory, mid-year budget report -projections. Finalize revenue projections. 2/17/95 Departmental budgets due to Budget Department. 2/17 to 3/3/95 Budget Department review of budgets. 2/28/95 Budget work session-revenues, mid-year expend., vehicle inventory. Public Hearing: General comment on FY1995-96 budget. 3/8 to 3/31/95 Budget Team Meetings/Citizen's Budget Review Committee: Prioritized Addbacks, Capital Improvements, Presentation of Departmental budgets, Discussion of Funding Issues 3/8 Citizen's Committee 3/13 Internal Support and Operations Budget Team (ISOP) 3/15 CourtsJState Agencies; Community Services Budget Team 3/17 Public Safety Budget Team 3/20 Internal Support and Operations :,~ 3/22 Courts/State Agencies; Community Services ,~ ~ ~~ 3/24 Public Safety ~` 3/29 Citizen's Committee-Isop, Community Services 1 4/5 Citizen's Committee-Public Safety, Courts/State Agencies ~ 4/19 Citizen's Committee-CIP, Final proposal 3/27-3/31/95 Team budget presentations to County Administrator. 3/28/95 Public Hearing: Tax Rates and Tax Assessment Increase(101 %). joint budget work session with School Board. 4/1/95 School Board presents budget to Board of Supervisors 4/4/95 Special Meeting -Budget worksession. Adopt Tax Rates. 4/11/95 Volunteer Rescue and Fire Chiefs budget worksession. • ~` 4/25/95 Budget worksession, Public hearing: Citizen discussion of budget ~, and CIP. ~~ 5/9/95 Adoption of Budget and CIP. 5/23/95 First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. 6/13/95 Second reading and adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. nt:~rurnxce~awccnw.~..~.wNC.wr 1-1 M E M O RAN D U M TO: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator FROM: John Willey `J~ Property Manager DATE: March 29, 1995 RE: VDOT Right-of-way During a Roanoke County Board of Supervisors executive session on March 14, 1995 I presented a VDOT proposal to acquire .06 acres of Roanoke County owned property at Kessler Mill. My instructions from the Board were to negotiate with VDOT to exchange the .06 acres for a VDOT owned parcel (approximately .13 acres) at the corner of Brambleton and Colonial. I have negotiated as instructed but must report that VDOT has declined the proposed exchange. The value of our parcel, by appraisal, is approximately $17,000 per acre, while VDOT feels the value of the corner parcel to be in excess of $100,000 per acre. Rather than debate in this memorandum, the relative merits of the values of these parcels, let it suffice to say that I have examined both parcels, and their appraisals, and feel a sufficient value differences exists. In any event VDOT is not sure they even wish to let the corner parcel leave there control. My sources say that the Resident Engineer wishes to retain it, but is willing to co-operate with Roanoke County and Economic Development. Per my further instructions from the Board, I will prepare a Board report for inclusion on the April 11, 1995 meeting agenda. This report will recommend acceptance of the VDOT offer. If I may be of further assistance or provide other information please inform me. JDW\pss . ~a.,~y ~- ~ ~~ JENNINC3S T. BIRLJ CARf~ L. KINDER. JR• nr.+N~l .n w. rll l>:FM.AN KF.1~iNETH J. LASK1' L. ~F~D BRAF'~dRD ytiFiRY M. FO~i~•~ $~RD. p'f'T'~ E $ A7 LA`rtAN, P.~. 22 Cl-[IJRC:H AVF.fyL76, S.W. ROr~P3G1~E~, VIFtCiYN1P~ ~Q71 April 10, 1~~~ Board of Supervisors Roanoke County, ~,rirgxnia 5244 Bernard Dx°3~ve, S.~'. Roanoke, VA 24Q18 Rey ,TPf~rey and Laura Maron~.c Rezoning; pub l.~,c Hoaxing RU. BdX 2795 t~.NOxE, vn a~oot•2795 7ELEPt-1dN6 (7(73; 962.1755 FRX ('70.313~3.5927 'VIA FAX 772-2191 Gent lemon ; As your file ';will reflect, T rgpxesent Mr. aid Mrs, Maronic ~.n the abt~ve~•Gaptipned r.pa.nn°ix~g. ~1e3E8 be adwiaed ~rA1~ 14(rt'. and Mr's. Maronie are hereby Withdrawing their Petition to s'e~s3ne the subject property fx•oro R-1 to R--3• Thank you for your cansideretion in this matter. Very truly yours, BIRD. KT~iDE~t ~ HUF~'MAN , ~' . C . ~~.. ~.~-- Csrr L. Ttin er, Jr. CLK/ckk ~ O ~ i'i ~1 L+I 3 3 rl H t3 3 ~ in I 73 ~ i'i I S ~ Yu tf ~ ~- b u '~ b • O S • ~ u MEMORANDUM TO: Terry Harrington 5~~`~ FROM: Mary Allen DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Report -April 25 Agenda Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare a status report for the April 25 Board of Supervisors agenda on cleanup of illegal dumps. Give me a call if you have any questions. MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Robertson FROM: Mary Allen `~X''f'~ DATE: April 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Report -April 25 Agenda Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare a status report for the April 25 Board of Supervisors agenda on the SSER Program. He would like you to include future plans for expansion to other areas of the County. If you have questions, give me a call. LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Alliance Properties Inc. to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 conditional to C-1 to construct a learning center, located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 6, 1995 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 11, 1995 Tuesday, April 18, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Alliance Properties Inc. c/o James Douthat PO Box 14125 Roanoke, VA 24038-4125 (703) 983-7662 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Assoc. to rezone 3.06 acres from I-1 conditional and C- 1 conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: April 6, 1995 ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, April 11, 1995 Tuesday, April 18, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Reformation Herald Publishing Assoc. Attn: Benjamin Burec 5240 Hollins Road NE Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 366-9400 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOB 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018